8C
Date: June 17, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Michelle Ramirez, Community Development Director
By: Uykheang Keo, Building Official | [email protected] Subject: Community Development – Approve Agreements for On-Call Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis.
Expenditure: Not-to-Exceed $7,500,000 (General Fund).
RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation of the Community Development Director that City Council:
1. Approve a consulting services agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. of Plano, TX (RFP B2024-15) in an amount not-to-exceed $2,500,000, for on-call expedited plan check services for a five-year period beginning July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2030; and
2. Approve a consulting services agreement with m6 Consulting, Inc. of Moorpark, CA (RFP B2024-15), in an amount not-to-exceed $2,500,000, for on-call expedited plan check services for a five-year period beginning July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2030; and
3. Approve a consulting services agreement with True North Compliance Services, Inc. of Long Beach, CA (RFP2024-15), in an amount not-to-exceed $2,500,000, for on-call expedited plan check services for a five-year period beginning July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2030.
FUNDING
Funding is available in Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating Budget under the Community Development Department and is expected to be available in subsequent fiscal years.
DISCUSSION
The City’s Community Development Department (CDD) requires engineering plan review for most proposed development projects. It’s not uncommon for applicants to choose an expedited plan review service to meet their project schedules or specific needs. These projects range from small single-family additions to large mixed-use developments. To facilitate the expedited plan reviews, CDD uses outside engineering consultants from time to time to assist in facilitating the plan reviews.
In these cases, the fee charged to the applicant is matched to the cost associated with the services provided by the outside engineering consultant plus 10% for administrative costs related to City staff time. The fee collected from the applicant for the outside service is then passed through to the consultant, while the City retains the 10% administrative fee, resulting in no negative impact to the City’s General Fund.
1 City Council
June 17, 2025
4 3
5 As there has been a recent increase in expedited plan review requests, CDD issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for on-call expedited plan check services on November 25, 2024. On December 16, 2024, the City received a total of 12 responses. Each response was reviewed, evaluated, and ranked by a 3-member internal team who independently rated each proposal based on an equally weighted criteria with a maximum allowable score of 100. The rating criteria established as well as the average scoring assigned for each individual criterion is included under Attachment 1.
At the conclusion of the evaluation process, staff selected the following three firms:
•Bureau Veritas North America, Inc,
•True North Compliance Services Inc.
•m6 Consulting Inc.
The final ranking of all firms is shown below.
Staff is recommending that the City Council approve a consulting services agreement with each of the three selected firms for a five-year period beginning July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2030.
Each agreement would be for a not-to-exceed contract amount of $2,500,000.
RESULTS
RANKING VENDOR NAME CITY STATE EVALUATION
SCORE
1 Bureau
Veritas North America, Inc. Plano TX 96.3
2 True North Compliance
Services, Inc. Long Beach CA 95.3
3 m6 Consulting Inc. Moorpark CA 93.3
4 Willdan Engineering Anaheim CA 91.3
5 Transtech Engineers, Inc Chino CA 86.7
6 CSG Consultants, Inc. Orange CA 85.0
7 J Lee Engineering, Inc. Alhambra CA 84.7
8 The Code Group, Inc.
(VCA Code) Orange CA 83.0
9 4LEAF, Inc. Newport
Beach CA 82.7
10 Shums Coda
Associates, Inc. Pleasanton CA 82.0
11 Hayer Consultants, Inc. Lakewood CA 76.7
12 FEI Associates Consulting
Engineers Chino CA 0.0
2 City Council
June 17, 2025
4 3
5 ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
The proposed action is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) Section 15378 and is therefore exempt from CEQA. It will not result in any direct or indirect physical change in the environment because it is only a preliminary action required in order to study the proposed project.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Average Score
2. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. – Consulting Services Agreement
3. M6 Consulting Inc. – Consulting Services Agreement
4.True North Compliance Services – Consulting Services Agreement 3 4LEAF, Inc.
Bureau
Veritas North America,
Inc.
CSG
Consultants, Inc.
FEI Associates
Consulting
Engineers
Hayer
Consultants, Inc.
J Lee
Engineering, Inc.
m6
Consulting Inc
Shums Coda
Associates, Inc.
The Code Group, Inc.
(VCA Code)
Transtech
Engineers, Inc
True North
Compliance
Services, Inc.
Willdan
Engineering
Firm’s qualifications and experience
with similar projects 30 25.7 29.0 26.7 0.0 22.3 24.3 28.7 25.7 24.7 25.7 29.0 27.3 Qualifications of proposed project
team 20 17.0 19.0 18.0 0.0 14.7 17.0 19.0 16.3 16.7 18.3 19.3 19.0 Cost and Cost Effectiveness 20 15.0 19.0 13.7 0.0 15.0 16.7 16.3 14.7 15.0 15.7 18.0 15.7 Understanding of the project and
scope of work; and completeness
of RFP 10 7.3 10.0 8.0 0.0 6.7 7.3 10.0 8.0 8.0 7.7 9.7 10.0 Relevant projects of proposed project
team members 10 8.7 9.7 9.3 0.0 9.0 9.7 9.7 7.7 9.3 9.7 9.7 9.7 Staffing (On-site Staffing) 10 9.0 9.7 9.3 0.0 9.0 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.3 9.7 9.7 9.7 Total Average 100 82.7 96.3 85.0 0.0 76.7 84.7 93.3 82.0 83.0 86.7 95.3 91.3 Average Points
Criteria Maximum
Points
1 Attachment 1
4 1
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of July 1, 2025 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF TORRANCE, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CONSULTANT”).
RECITALS:
A. CITY wishes to retain the services of an experienced and qualified CONSULTANT to provide the Community Development Department expedited plan check services for various projects on an "as-needed" basis.
B. In order to obtain the desired services, CITY has circulated its Request for Proposal for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis, RFP No. B2024-15 (the “RFP”). A true and correct copy of the RFP is attached herein as Exhibit A.
C. CONSULTANT has submitted a Proposal (the “Proposal”) in response to the RFP. In its Proposal CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform those services requested in the RFP. A true and correct copy of the Proposal is attached herein as Exhibit B.
D. Based upon its review of all proposals submitted in response to the RFP, CITY now wishes to award this Agreement to CONSULTANT.
AGREEMENT:
1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT will provide the services and install those materials listed in CONSULTANT’s Proposal submitted in response to the RFP. A true and correct copy of the RFP is attached herein as Exhibit A. A true and correct copy of the Proposal is attached herein as Exhibit B. CONSULTANT warrants that all work and services set forth in the Proposal will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner.
2. TERM
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Paragraph 4 below, this Agreement will continue in full force and effect from the Effective Date through June 30, 2030.
3. COMPENSATION
A. CONSULTANT’s Fee.
For services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT will be paid in accordance with the Compensation Schedule set forth in the Proposal; provided, however, that in no event will the total amount of money paid CONSULTANT, for services initially contemplated by this Attachment 2
5 2
Agreement, exceed the sum of $2,500,000 (the “Agreement Sum”), unless otherwise first approved in writing by CITY.
B. Schedule of Payment.
Provided that CONSULTANT is not in default under the terms of this Agreement, upon presentation of an invoice, CONSULTANT will be paid the fees described in Paragraph 3.A. above, according to the Compensation Schedule. Payment will be due within 30 days after the date of the invoice.
4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. Termination by CITY for Convenience.
1. CITY may, at any time, terminate the Agreement for CITY’s convenience and without cause.
2. Upon receipt of written notice from CITY of such termination for CITY’s convenience, CONSULTANT will:
a. cease operations as directed by CITY in the notice;
b. take actions necessary, or that CITY may direct, for the protection and preservation of the work; and
c. except for work directed to be performed prior to the effective date of termination stated in the notice, terminate all existing subcontracts and purchase orders and enter into no further subcontracts and purchase orders.
3. In case of termination for CITY’s convenience, CONSULTANT will be entitled to receive payment for work executed, together with costs incurred by reason of the termination, along with reasonable overhead and profit on work not executed.
B. Termination for Cause.
1. If either party fails to perform any term, covenant or condition in this Agreement and that failure continues for 15 calendar days after the nondefaulting party gives the defaulting party written notice of the failure to perform, this Agreement may be terminated for cause; provided, however, that if during the notice period the defaulting party has promptly commenced and continues diligent efforts to remedy the default, the defaulting party will have such additional time as is reasonably necessary to remedy the default.
2. In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the default of CONSULTANT, CITY may, at the expense of CONSULTANT
and its surety, complete this Agreement or cause it to be completed. Any check or bond delivered to the CITY in connection with this Agreement, and the money payable thereon, will be 6 3
forfeited to and remain the property of the CITY. All moneys due CONSULTANT under the terms of this Agreement will be retained by CITY, but the retention will not release CONSULTANT and its surety from liability for the default. Under these circumstances, however, CONSULTANT and its surety will be credited with the amount of money retained, toward any amount by which the cost of completion exceeds the Agreement Sum and any amount
authorized for extra services.
3. Termination for cause will not affect or terminate any of the rights of CITY as against CONSULTANT or its surety then existing, or that may thereafter accrue because of the default; this provision is in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the CITY under law.
C. Termination for Breach of Law.
In the event CONSULTANT or any of its officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, subsidiaries or affiliates is convicted (i) of a criminal offense as an incident to obtaining or attempting to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or in the performance of a contract or subcontract; (ii) under state or federal statutes of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that currently, seriously, and directly affects responsibility as a public consultant or CONSULTANT; (iii) under state or federal antitrust statutes arising out of the submission of bids or proposals; or (iv) of violation of Paragraph 19 of this Agreement; or for any other cause CITY determines to be so serious and compelling as to affect CONSULTANT’s responsibility as a public consultant or CONSULTANT, including but not limited to, debarment by another governmental agency, then CITY reserves the unilateral right to terminate this Agreement or to impose such other sanctions (which may include financial sanctions, temporary suspensions or any other condition deemed appropriate short of termination) as it deems proper. CITY will not take action until CONSULTANT has been given notice and an opportunity to present evidence in mitigation.
5. FORCE MAJEURE
If any party fails to perform its obligations because of strikes, lockouts, labor disputes, embargoes, acts of God, inability to obtain labor or materials or reasonable substitutes for labor or materials, governmental restrictions, governmental regulations, governmental control, judicial orders, enemy or hostile governmental action, civil commotion, fire or other casualty, or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the party obligated to perform, then that party’s performance will be excused for a period equal to the period of that cause for failure to perform.
///
7 4
6. RETENTION OF FUNDS
CONSULTANT authorizes CITY to deduct from any amount payable to CONSULTANT (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute or that are necessary to compensate CITY for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by CITY, and all amounts for which CITY may be liable to third parties, by reason of CONSULTANT’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform CONSULTANT’s obligations under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by CONSULTANT, or any indebtedness exists that appears to be the basis for a claim of lien, CITY may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of the withholding, an amount sufficient to cover the claim. The failure of CITY to exercise the right to deduct or to withhold will not, however, affect the obligations of CONSULTANT to insure, indemnify, and protect CITY as elsewhere provided in this Agreement.
7. CITY REPRESENTATIVE
Uykheang Keo, Building Official, Community Development Department is designated as the “City Representative,” authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work and services specified in this Agreement and to make all decisions in connection with this Agreement. Whenever approval, directions, or other actions are required by CITY under this Agreement, those actions will be taken by the City Representative, unless otherwise stated. The City Manager has the right to designate another City Representative at any time, by providing notice to CONSULTANT.
8. CONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE(S)
The following principal(s) of CONSULTANT are designated as being the principal(s) and representative(s) of CONSULTANT authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified in this Agreement and make all decisions in connection with this Agreement:
Joe Chao, P.E., Regional Manager/Project Manager
Craig Baptista, Vice President, Facilities - West Region
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT is, and at all times will remain as to CITY, a wholly independent contractor. Neither CITY nor any of its agents will have control over the conduct of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT’s employees, except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement. CONSULTANT’s agents and employees are not and shall not be considered employees of CITY for any purpose. CONSULTANT may not, at any time or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of CITY. CITY has no duty, obligation, or responsibility to CONSULTANT’s agents or employees under the Affordable Care Act. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for any tax penalties associated with the failure to offer affordable coverage to its agents and employees under the Affordable Care Act and any other liabilities, claims and obligations regarding compliance with the Affordable Care Act with respect to CONSULTANT’s agents and employees. CITY is not responsible and shall not be held liable for CONSULTANT’s failure to comply with CONSULTANT’s duties, 8 5
obligations, and responsibilities under the Affordable Care Act. CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold CITY harmless for any and all taxes and penalties that may be assessed against CITY as a result of CONSULTANT’s obligations under the Affordable Care Act relating to CONSULTANT’s agents and employees.
10. BUSINESS LICENSE
CONSULTANT must obtain a City business license prior to the start of work under this Agreement, unless CONSULTANT is qualified for an exemption.
11. OTHER LICENSES AND PERMITS
CONSULTANT warrants that it has all professional, contracting and other permits and licenses required to undertake the work contemplated by this Agreement.
12. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK
By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT (a) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services required under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of the services set forth in this Agreement.
Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that will materially affect the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement, CONSULTANT must immediately inform CITY of that fact and may not proceed except at CONSULTANT’s risk until written instructions are received from CITY.
13. CARE OF WORK
CONSULTANT must adopt reasonable methods during the term of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and other components to prevent losses or damages, and will be responsible for all damages to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by CITY, except those losses or damages as may be caused by CITY’s own negligence.
14. CONSULTANT’S ACCOUNTING RECORDS; OTHER PROJECT RECORDS Records of CONSULTANT’s time pertaining to the project, and records of accounts between CITY and CONSULTANT, will be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis. CONSULTANT will also maintain all other records, including without limitation, specifications, drawings, progress reports and the like, relating to the work and services identified in Exhibit A. All records will be available to CITY during normal working hours. CONSULTANT will maintain these records for three years after final payment.
15. INDEMNIFICATION
CONSULTANT will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Torrance, the City Council, each member thereof, present and future, members of boards and 9 6
commissions, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively “City Affiliates”) from and against any and all liability, expenses, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damages whatsoever, including, but not limited to, those arising from breach of contract, bodily injury, death, personal injury, property damage, loss of use, or property loss however the same may be caused and regardless of the responsibility for negligence. The obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless includes, but is not limited to, any liability or expense, including defense costs and legal fees, arising from the negligent acts or omissions, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, subCONSULTANTs or vendors. CONSULTANT’s obligations to indemnify, defend and hold harmless will apply even in the event of concurrent negligence on the part of City Affiliates, except for liability resulting solely from the negligence or willful misconduct of City Affiliates. Payment by CITY is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this indemnity. In the event of any dispute between CONSULTANT and CITY, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence of City Affiliates, CONSULTANT will be obligated to pay for the defense of City Affiliates until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City Affiliates as solely negligent. CONSULTANT will not be entitled in the event of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and costs of litigation.
16. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
No officer or employee of CITY will be personally liable to CONSULTANT, in the event of any default or breach by the CITY or for any amount that may become due to CONSULTANT.
17. INSURANCE
A. CONSULTANT and its subCONSULTANTs must maintain for the duration of the Agreement at their sole expense the following insurance, which will be full coverage not subject to self-insurance provisions:
1. Automobile Liability, including owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, with at least the following limits of liability:
a. Primary Bodily Injury with limits of at least $500,000 per person, $1,000,000 per occurrence; and
b. Primary Property Damage of at least $250,000 per
occurrence; or
c. Combined single limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence.
2. Commercial General Liability including coverage for premises, products and completed operations, independent
CONSULTANTs/vendors, personal injury and contractual
obligations with combined single limits of coverage of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 aggregate.
///
10 7
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and, if workers' compensation is required, employer's liability insurance with minimum limits of ($1,000,000) per occurrence or occupational illness. The Workers' Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the CITY for all work performed by the CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subconsultants.
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT’S profession, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $4,000,000 aggregate.
B. The insurance provided by CONSULTANT will be primary and non- contributory.
C. CITY, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Torrance, the City Council and each member thereof, members of boards and commissions, every officer, agent, official, employee and volunteer must be named as additional insureds under the automobile and general liability policies.
D. CONSULTANT must provide certificates of insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) indicating appropriate coverage, to the City Clerk of the City of Torrance before the commencement of work.
E. Each insurance policy required by this Paragraph must contain a provision that no termination, cancellation or change of coverage can be made without notice to the CITY.
F. If the CONSULTANT maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the CONSULTANT. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY.
G. The procuring of insurance shall not be construed as a limitation on liability nor as full performance of the indemnification provisions of the CONSULTANT.
H. Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
a. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
11 8
b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at l east five (5) years a fter completion of the contract of work.
c. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made poli cy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Vendor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.
I. CONSULTANT hereby grants to CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
J. Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY.
The CITY may require the CONSULTANT to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY.
18. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURERS
Insurance required by this Agreement will be satisfactory only if issued by companies admitted to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless these requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of CITY (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. In the event the Risk Manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to CITY, the CONSULTANT agrees that the minimum limits of any insurance policies or performance bonds required by this Agreement may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager; provided that CONSULTANT will have the right to appeal a determination of increased coverage by the Risk Manager to the City Council of CITY within 10 days of receipt of notice from the Risk Manager.
19. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
A. No officer or employee of the CITY may have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor may any officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement that affects the officer or employee’s financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which the officer or employee is, directly or indirectly interested, in violation of any law, rule or regulation.
B. No person may offer, give, or agree to give any officer or employee or former officer or employee, nor may any officer or employee solicit, 12 9
demand, accept, or agree to accept from another person, a gratuity or an offer of employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, preparation or any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any way pertaining to any program requirement, contract or subcontract, or to any solicitation or proposal.
20. NOTICE
A. All notices, requests, demands, or other communications under this Agreement will be in writing. Notice will be sufficiently given for all purposes as follows:
1. Personal delivery. When personally delivered to the recipient, notice is effective on delivery.
2. First Class mail. When mailed first class to the last address of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective three mail delivery days after deposit in a United States Postal Service office or mailbox.
3. Certified mail. When mailed certified mail, return receipt requested, notice is effective on receipt, if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt.
4. Overnight delivery. When delivered by an overnight delivery service, charges prepaid or charged to the sender’s account, notice is effective on delivery, if delivery is confirmed by the delivery service.
5. Facsimile transmission. When sent by fax to the last fax number of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective on receipt. Any notice given by fax will be deemed received on the next business day if it is received after 5:00 p.m. (recipient’s time) or on a non-business day.
6. Addresses for purpose of giving notice are as follows:
CONSULTANT: Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
250 N. Westlake Blvd.
Suite 150
Westlake Village, CA 91362
Fax: N/A
CITY: City Clerk
City of Torrance
3031 Torrance Boulevard
Torrance, CA 90503
Fax: (310) 618-2931
13 10
B. Any correctly addressed notice that is refused, unclaimed, or undeliverable because of an act or omission of the party to be notified, will be deemed effective as of the first date the notice was refused, unclaimed or deemed undeliverable by the postal authorities, messenger or overnight delivery service.
C. Either party may change its address or fax number by giving the other party notice of the change in any manner permitted by this Agreement.
21. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement and all exhibits are binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties. The Agreement may not be assigned or subcontracted by either CITY or CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of the other.
22. INTEGRATION; AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained in it. No prior oral or written understanding will be of any force or effect with respect to the terms of this Agreement. The Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both parties.
23. INTERPRETATION
The terms of this Agreement should be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and should not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or by any other rule of construction that might otherwise apply. To the extent that the terms of the RFP or Proposal are inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
24. SEVERABILITY
If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, that part will be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with any applicable laws, but the remainder of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
25. TIME OF ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
26. GOVERNING LAW; JURISDICTION
This Agreement will be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Jurisdiction of any litigation arising from the Agreement will be in Los Angeles County, California.
27. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTES AND REGULATIONS
CONSULTANT will be knowledgeable of and will comply with all applicable federal, state, county and city statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances and orders. ///
///
14 11
28. WAIVER OF BREACH
No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a nondefaulting party on any default will impair the right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
A party’s consent or approval of any act by the other party requiring the first party’s consent or approval will not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and will not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
29. ATTORNEY’S FEES
Except as provided for in Paragraph 15, in any dispute, litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding by which one party either seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement (whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing party will be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees, together with any costs and expenses, to resolve the dispute and to enforce any judgment.
30. EXHIBITS
All exhibits identified in this Agreement are incorporated into the Agreement by this reference.
31. CONSULTANT’S AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT warrant that (i) CONSULTANT is duly organized and existing; (ii) they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT; (iii) by so executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement; and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which CONSULTANT is bound.
32. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
Any documents submitted by the CONSULTANT; all information obtained in connection with the CITY’s right to audit and inspect the CONSULTANT’s documents, books, and accounting records pursuant to paragraph 14 CONSULTANT’s Accounting Records; Other Project Records; as well as those documents which were required to be submitted in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) used in the solicitation process for this Contract become the exclusive property of the City. All such documents become a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public records. Exceptions will be those elements in the California Government Code Section 7920.000 et seq. (Public Records Act) and which are marked “trade secret”, “confidential”, or “proprietary”.
The CITY shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records including, without limitation, those so marked, if disclosure is required by law, or by an order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction.
///
///
///
15 12
In the event the CITY is required to defend an action on a Public Records Act request for any of the aforementioned documents, information, books, records, and/or contents of a proposal marked “trade secret”, “confidential”, or “proprietary”, the CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify the CITY from all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, in action or liability arising under the Public Records Act.
CITY OF TORRANCE,
a municipal corporation
By: ____________________________
George K. Chen, Mayor
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation
By: _______________________________
Craig Baptista
Vice President, Facilities - West Region
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________
Rebecca Poirier, MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN
City Attorney
By: ____________________________
Galen W. Bean
Deputy City Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit A Request for Proposal for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on
an as Needed Basis, RFP No. B2024-15
Exhibit B Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.’s Proposal
Rev. 0424
16 EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR EXPEDITED PLAN CHECK SERVICES FOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, RFP NO. B2024-15
[To be attached]
17 1
Request for Proposals (RFP)
City of Torrance | 3031 Torrance Blvd, Torrance CA 90503 | www.TorranceCA.Gov
RFP No. B2024-15 RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis
RFP Submittal Information
No mail or hand delivered Proposals. No faxed proposals.
No Late proposals.
Location: City of Torrance
Purchasing Division
3031 Torrance Blvd.
Torrance, CA 90503
Date: December 16, 2024
Time Deadline: 12:00 p.m. Local (Pacific) Time
Submittal Requirements
Your submittal must include the following:
• Vendor’s Response (Section III of this document) on the forms provided. If additional space is required, please attach additional pages.
• Bidders Affidavit (Attachment 1)
• Brief summary of your firm, its capabilities, and its recent experience. Also, describe your demonstrated experience with similar projects and qualification including professional licenses and certifications.
• Qualifications of the consultant and references from cities and/or counties that have contracted for similar services from the consultant. Past experience checking plans for local jurisdictions. • Qualifications of the plans reviewers who will be providing services.
Proposers will be disqualified if their proposal does not include the above items.
Prior to the award of a Contract
The successful vendor, must submit the following to the City of Torrance • Proof of insurance and applicable bonds, as indicated in the terms and conditions of this RFP document.
• Proof of a City of Torrance Business License, please contact the City of Torrance Business License Office at (310) 618-5923.
Questions Regarding this RFP Must be Submitted on PlanetBids • The deadline to submit questions is 12:00 Noon Pacific Time on Monday, December 9, 2024.
• All questions regarding this RFP must be submitted online.
18 2
RFP No. B2024-15 RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis
SECTION I RFP INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION
Notice is hereby given that sealed proposals will be received online until 12:00 p.m. December 16, 2024.
The City of Torrance:
The City of Torrance is on the western side of Los Angeles County. It is boarded by the Palos Verdes Peninsula on the south, the City of Gardena on the north, the City of Redondo Beach on the north and west boundaries, the City of Lomita on the east and the Pacific Ocean on the west. The City encompasses an area of approximately 21 square miles, 329 miles of Streets, 1870 intersections, 550 miles of sidewalks, 47,000 Street Trees, 6 Public Libraries, a Municipal Airport, Transit System, 46 Parks & Recreation Amenities, 6 Fire Stations, 1 Police Station and 1 Police Community Center, and has an estimated population of approximately 146,115, which makes Torrance one of the top 10 cities in Los Angeles County in regards to population.
Background:
The City of Torrance (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) is requesting for proposals (RFP) from qualified firms with experience in providing expedited plan check for the City’s Building and Safety Division of the Community Development Department on an as needed basis. The selected firms will work with the Building Official and their staffs to review plans and documents for code compliance.
Services include, but not limited to, review of commercial, residential, industrial plans and documents for compliance with the current edition of the California Building Standards Code as adopted and amended by the City of Torrance, City of Torrance Ordinances, and all applicable codes and statutes.
Definitions:
Word Definition as applied to this RFP
City The City of Torrance, California
Vendor, Contractor,
Proposer, Firm or
Consultant
The person, firm, company or corporation providing services to the City, or submitting a proposal in response to this RFP
Contract, Purchase
Order, Agreement,
Purchasing Agreement
The agreement between the awarded Vendor and the City as a result of this Request for Proposals
Proposal Submittal Form:
Prospective bidders must submit bids in electronic only format at https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/47426/portal-home; The proposal must be made on the form provided and uploaded on PlanetBids.
Scan and attach the following required documents to your eBid. This list may not be all-inclusive; additional items may be required elsewhere in bid specifications. Failure to provide required documents with bid may cause the bid to be deemed non-responsive.) If an individual makes the proposal, it must be signed by that individual, with an address and telephone number. If made by a business entity, it must be signed by an authorized person that executes binding agreements and contracts. A full business address and telephone are required. 19 3
Blank spaces in the proposal form must be completed using ink, indelible pencil, typewriter or digitally.
The text of the proposal form must not be changed and no additions. Any unauthorized conditions, limitations, or provisos attached to a proposal will render it informal and may cause its rejection.
Alterations by erasure or interlineations must be explained or noted in the proposal form over the signature of the Proposer.
Questions:
All questions regarding this RFP must be submitted online no later than 12:00 PM Monday, December 9, 2024. Answers to questions will be posted online for all interested bidders to review.
Bidders who have downloaded bid documents by the time that the questions are responded to will receive an automated email notifying them of additional information and/or addendums that have been posted to the website. No questions via telephone. No questions submitted after deadline.
Written answers and any other changes to the RFP will be sent via Planetbids to all known prospective proposers as an addendum to the RFP.
Errors and Omissions:
The proposer may not take advantage of any errors and/or omissions in these specifications or in the proposer’s specifications submitted with its proposal. If there are errors or omissions, you will be notified.
Proposers Examination of Requirements:
The Proposer is required to examine carefully the site, the instructions, information and specifications of this document, investigate the conditions, the character, quality and quantity of work to be performed as required by this document. Submission of a proposal will be considered prima facie evidence that the Proposer has made such examination.
Reservation:
The City reserves the right to revise or amend these specifications prior to the date set for opening proposals. Revisions and amendments will be identified by an addendum to this RFP. If the revisions require additional time to enable vendors to respond, the City may postpone the opening date accordingly. In such case, the addendum will include an announcement of the new proposal submittal due date.
Attach all addenda to the proposal. Failure to attach any addendum may render the proposal non- responsive and cause for rejection.
The City reserves the right to award a contract to a company solely based on the initial proposal submitted. The City reserves the right to require more information and clarification on information submitted in the proposal to complete the evaluation.
The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all proposals received, to take all proposals under advisement for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days after the date of the opening, to waive any informality on any proposal, and to be the sole judge of the relative merits of the material and or service mentioned in the respective proposals received. The City reserves the right to reject any proposal not accompanied with all data or information required. 20 4
This Request for Proposals does not commit the City to award a contract or to pay any cost incurred in the preparation of a proposal. All responses to this RFP document become the property of the City of Torrance.
The City reserves the right to examine all factors bearing on a Proposer’s ability to perform the services under the contract. The City reserves the right to reject any proposal not accompanied with all data or information required. The City reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, without penalty, at its sole discretion.
Affidavit:
An affidavit form is enclosed. It must be completed signifying that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or made in the interest or on behalf of any person not named in the proposal, that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a sham proposal or any other person, firm, or corporation to refrain from proposing, and that the proposer has not in any manner sought by collusion to secure for itself an advantage over any other proposer. Any proposal submitted without an affidavit or in violation of this requirement will be rejected. (Attachment 1)
License Requirements:
The successful proposer is required to show proof of a current license of the following:
• Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of California in Civil, Structural and Geotechnical • Certified Access Specialist (CASp) certification from California Division of State Architect • Certified Plans Examiners
Evaluation of Proposals:
The City will be the sole determiner of suitability to the City’s needs. Proposals are rated according to their completeness and understanding of the City’s needs, conformance to the requirements of the technical specifications, compatibility with the City’s current technology and operations, prior experience with similar scope of work, financial capabilities, delivery, and cost. Cost including any ongoing maintenance and support cost are reviewed to determine which proposal best meets the needs of the City.
The City will take into consideration a local Torrance vendor sales tax rebate of 1.50% for proposals submitted by a Torrance vendor that include a material component.
The City’s project evaluation team will evaluate proposals based on the evaluation criteria listed below. Points will be assigned to each criterion up to a maximum of 100 points. Proposals will be ranked and that ranking will be made public.
Subsequently, the City may interview a qualified Firm, prior to deciding whether to recommend the award of an Agreement.
21 5
Description of Evaluation Criteria Possible Points
Firm’s qualifications and experience with similar projects 30 Qualifications of proposed project team 20
Cost and Cost Effectiveness 20
Understanding of the project and scope of work; and completeness of RFP
10 Relevant projects of proposed project team members 10 Staffing (On-site Staffing) 10
Maximum Total Points = 100
PART I – EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS: After receipt of proposals for this project, the City’s project evaluation committee will evaluate proposals based on the criteria listed below (with exception of cost), and develop a short list of qualified Firms. The Firms on this short list will be invited to interview with the City.
PART II – INTERVIEW: An interview will be held for qualified firms at the discretion of the City.
The Contract:
The awarded vendor will be required to enter into a written contract with the City of Torrance. A copy of the standardized contract, which will be modified to reflect the awarded RFP, is attached to the documents section in PlanetBids. A copy of this RFP and the accepted proposal will be attached to and become a part of the contract.
Contract Term:
The initial contract will be for a period of five years from December 15, 2024.
Consumer Price Index:
If the contract is extended after the initial period, commencing in the subsequent year, the contract may be increased by the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the Los Angeles area (April-to-April).
Independent Contractor:
The successful proposer will at all times remain to the City, a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its agents will have control over the conduct of the Contractor or any of the Contractor’s employees, except as otherwise set forth in the awarded Agreement. The Contractor’s agents and employees are not and will not be considered employees of the City for any purpose. The Contractor may not, at any time or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. The City has no duty, obligation, or responsibility to the Contractor’s agents or employees under the Affordable Care Act. The Contractor is solely responsible for any tax penalties associated with the failure to offer affordable coverage to its agents and employees under the Affordable Care Act and any other liabilities, claims and obligations regarding compliance with the Affordable Care Act with respect to the Contractor’s agents and employees. The City is not responsible or liable for the Contractor’s failure to comply with the 22 6
Contractor’s duties, obligations, and responsibilities under the Affordable Care Act. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless for all taxes and penalties that may be assessed against the City because of the Contractor’s obligations under the Affordable Care Act relating to the Contractor’s agents and employees.
Payments:
Complete payment on the contract price will be made in approximately thirty (30) days from date of delivery, or completion and acceptance, unless otherwise provided for in Proposer’s proposal or in these specifications. Payments will be made upon verification and acceptance by the City of contract services performed and upon the City’s receipt of a correct invoice.
Suspension of Procurement:
The City may suspend, in writing all or a portion of the procurement of materials or services pursuant to this RFP and subsequent contract agreement, in the event unforeseen circumstances make such procurement impossible or infeasible, or in the event, City should determine it to be in the best interest of City to cancel such procurement of services or materials.
In the event of termination, selected Proposer will perform such additional work as is necessary for the orderly filing of documents, and closing of project.
The selected Proposer will be compensated for the terminated procurement based on materials or services actually furnished or performed prior to the effective date of termination, plus the work reasonably required for filing and closing.
Notice of Intent to Award:
Approximately two (2) weeks prior to the anticipated City Council meeting awarding a contract because of the RFP, the City will notify all proposer’s of its intent to award. Results will be posted on the City of Torrance Web site https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/47426/portal-home 23 7
RFP No. B2024-15 RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis
SECTION II TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
Overview/Introduction:
The purpose of the RFP is to seek qualified firms to perform expedited plan review services of commercial, residential, industrial and structures for verification of compliance with the current adopted California Building Standards Code, City of Torrance Ordinance, and all applicable codes and statues. Services may include providing temporary staff on-site to perform plan review of various building and structure types for compliance with the adopted codes. Firms responding to this RFP should be able to demonstrate that the personnel that they employ possess certifications and/or licenses relevant to the work they are performing. The City’s intent is to minimize response time and improve overall efficiency for our customers. The City may select multiple vendors.
This RFP is intended to be as descriptive as possible. However, Proposers may not take advantage of omissions or oversights in this document. Proposers must supply products and services that meet or exceed the requirements of this RPF. In the event of a dispute over installation or performance, the needs of the City of Torrance will govern.
Scope of Work:
The ideal firms will provide highly qualified licensed design professionals and certified individuals to provide efficient, accurate and timely plan checks services with sufficient staffing to meet the City’s needs. The staff should have previous experience working for cities, be customer-service oriented, and have experience successfully managing multiple tasks, assignments and responsibilities. Firm shall have the capability to conduct electronic plan review.
The selected firm will be required to review all building, energy, and green related documents submitted by private developers, contractors, designers, and owners for construction and reconstruction projects.
• Plans must be checked according to all applicable codes and statutes as well as project Conditions of Approval from other City departments. All plans must be stamped and signed off if they meet all such requirements, and all changes/corrections must be identified and addressed prior to approval.
• All plan review services shall be performed by a licensed design professional (State of California) and certified individuals with extensive experience in plan review. All staff utilized by Consultant shall be appropriately licensed, registered, and certified as required by the State of California and the City to perform each of the specific scopes of work.
• Consultant shall review all plan check applications for accuracy and make all necessary revisions to such items as description, valuation, square footage, type of construction, and use. All plan review correction materials including marked up plans, documents, and plan check correction lists shall be provided in the City desired format to the City representative immediately upon completion of the plan review at no extra charge to City. This process includes pickup and delivery of the submitted plans. 24 8
• Provide plan check status reports and statistical reports upon request of City in the format type requested by the City (paper or electronic). The information requested may include such information as project name, address, description, square footage, and type of construction, type of review(s) performed, hour(s) required per review, reviewer name, reviewer credentials and turnaround time of plan review(s). • Consultant shall be available to attend pre-submittal and design discussion meetings with the permit applicant as requested by the City. These meetings shall be compensated at the rate of one (1) hour of straight-time compensation and do not include travel time.
• Ability to provide electronic plan check services.
• Maintain one (1) individual as the contact for all communication with the City. • Ability to provide plan review services at the City upon request. Consultant shall provide all necessary materials and resources to assigned personnel sufficient to perform their works.
In order to meet city-established standards, the expected turnaround times for plan review are as follows:
• All projects – 10 business days from date of receiving the drawings.
General Requirements:
• Brief summary of your firm, its capabilities, and its recent experience. Also, describe your demonstrated experience with similar projects and qualification including professional licenses and certifications.
• Qualifications of the consultant and references from cities and/or counties that have contracted for similar services from the consultant. Past experience checking plans for local jurisdictions. • Qualifications of the plans checkers and inspectors who will be providing services.
25 9
RFP No. B2024-15 RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis
SECTION III PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
FAILURE TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS IN THIS SECTION MAY INVALIDATE PROPOSAL.
In accordance with your "Request for Proposals (RFP)", the following proposal is submitted to the City of Torrance.
RFP Submitted By:
________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Company
________________________________________________________________________________ Street Address City Zip Code
________________________________________ _____________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number
________________________________________ _____________________________________ Printed Name/Title E-Mail Address
________________________________________ ___________________________________ Signature Date
Form of Business Organization: Please indicate the following (check one).
Corporation Partnership Sole Proprietorship Other: ___________________________
Do you have a Parent Company? No Yes, ___________________________________ (Name of Parent Company)
Do you have any Subsidiaries? No Yes, ___________________________________ (Name of Subsidiary Company)
Business History:
Years in business under your current name and form of business organization? ________ Years If less than three (3) years and your company was in business under a different name, what was that name?
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
Contact for Additional Information:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company to contact for any additional information:
________________________________________ __________________________________ Printed Name Title
________________________________________ __________________________________ Telephone E-Mail Address
26 10
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Payment Terms: The City of Torrance Payment terms are Net 30. The City does not make pre- payments, or pay upon receipt.
Do you offer any discounted invoice terms? _____________________________
Project Start and Completion:
The City requires the project to start as soon as possible from the award of a contract and the project completed as soon as possible. Specific periods that are mutually agreed upon will be established after award of a contract.
Project Manager:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company who will serve as Project Manager for this contract.
_________________________________________ __________________________________ Name Title
_______________________ __________________ ____________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
Contract Representative:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company who will be responsible for administering this contract.
____________________________________________ _________________________________ Name Title
_______________________ __________________ _________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
27 11
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Sub Contractors:
If awarded, will you be using sub contractors to carry out the scope of work required in this RFP?
Yes, we will be using sub contractors and have listed their contact information below.
No, we will not be using any sub contractors for this project.
_______________________ __________________ ______________________________ Company Name Contact Name Title
_______________________ __________________ ________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
Please explain the working relationship between your company and the sub contractor.
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
28 12
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects:
In the space below, please provide a narrative explaining your background and recent experience with similar projects as the scope of work identified in this RFP. (Please attach additional sheet if needed.)
29 13
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Work Plan for Each Required Task:
In the space below, please describe in detail the methodology you will be utilizing to conduct for each task. (Please attach additional sheets if needed.)
30 14
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
References:
Please supply the names of companies/agencies for which you recently supplied comparable goods/services as requested in this RFP. A minimum of three (3) references is required; additional references are optional. References from public agencies are preferred. Do not include the City of Torrance as a reference for this RFP.
1 Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City:
State, Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
2 Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City, State Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
3 Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City, State Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
31 15
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
RFP Submittal Requirement and Acknowledgement
Vendors are required to answer each of the questions listed below. You must indicate below that you have provided this information in your proposal submittal. You must attach additional sheets to your RFP submittal describing in detail the service you are proposing.
RFP Scope of Work Questions
Indicate what page in your
proposal you have
answered this question.
Did you include a signed Affidavit Form with your RFP Submittal?
Yes No
Did you include proof of a valid State of California Civil, Structural, Geotechnical Engineering License.
Did you include proof of a valid Certified Access Specialist (CASp) certification from California Division of State Architect.
Did you include proof of relevance certifications to perform plan review and inspection?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Did you attach additional sheets to answer the Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects information within this RFP?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you complete a project proposal as described in the Technical Requirements?
Yes No
Did you review all addenda, if any, issued by the City?
Yes No
Did you include resumes of no more than three (3) qualified candidates?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you include References?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal
Are your Wage Rates (Non-Prevailing) Included?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Have you included Proposed Alternative Language to City’s Pro Forma Consulting Services Agreement (if applicable)
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal
32 16
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
RFP Submittal Requirement and Acknowledgement Continued Vendors are required to answer each of the questions listed below. You must indicate below that you have provided this information in your proposal submittal. You must attach additional sheets to your RFP submittal describing in detail the service you are proposing.
RFP Scope of Work Questions
Indicate what page in your
proposal you have answered
this question.
Did you indicate your price to provide the plans review services as indicated in this RFP?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you describe your experience with plan check review? Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
33 17
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Price Proposal Cost Breakdown To Provide the Services Required in this RFP Description No. of Hours Labor Cost/hr ($) Cost
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Total Price Proposal $
Price Proposal
In accordance with your "Request for Proposal", the following price proposal is submitted to the City of Torrance. We understand that our price submittal is a not to exceed amount and that if we are selected to enter into negotiations with the City the pricing may be adjusted down unless additional services are requested and pricing will be negotiated and adjusted accordingly.
Category Description
(Vendor must attached a full description for each
category explaining what they are proposing) All services must be itemized. Do not bundle.
Proposal Not to Exceed
Amount by Category Description
Building Plan Check** $
Total Amount for Project $
** This review include energy, green building, accessibility, references and all applicable codes and statues.
34 18
RFP Document Revised September, 2019
ATTACHMENT 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROPOSER’S AFFIDAVIT
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
____________________________ being first duly sworn deposes and says:
1. That he/she is the ___________________________ of _____________________________ (Title of Office) (Name of Company)
Hereinafter called “proposer”, who has submitted to the City of Torrance a proposal for
__________________________________________________________________________ (Title of RFP)
2. That the proposal is genuine; that all statements of fact in the proposal are true;
3. That the proposal was not made in the interest or behalf of any person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation not named or disclosed;
4. That the Proposer did not, directly or indirectly, induce solicit or agree with anyone else to submit a false or sham proposal, to refrain from proposing, or to withdraw his proposal, to raise or fix the proposal price of the Proposer or of anyone else, or to raise or fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the Proposer’s price or the price of anyone else; and did not attempt to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of Torrance, or of any other Proposer, or anyone else interested in the proposed contract;
5. That the Proposer has not in any other manner sought by collusion to secure for itself an advantage over the other Proposer or to induce action prejudicial to the interests of the City of Torrance, or of any other Proposer or of anyone else interested in the proposed contract;
6. That the Proposer has not accepted any proposal from any subcontractor or materialman through any proposal depository, the bylaws, rules or regulations of which prohibit or prevent the Proposer from considering any proposal from any subcontractor or material man, which is not processed through that proposal depository, or which prevent any subcontractor or materialman from proposing to any contractor who does not use the facilities of or accept proposals from or through such proposal depository;
7. That the Proposer did not, directly or indirectly, submit the Proposer’s proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or to any individual or group of individuals, except to the City of Torrance, or to any person or persons who have a partnership or other financial interest with said Proposer in its business.
8. That the Proposer has not been debarred from participation in any State or Federal works project.
Dated this ____ day of ________________, 20_____.
_____________________________________
(Proposer Signature)
_____________________________________
(Title)
35 Document1 1
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of Date (the “Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF TORRANCE, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and CONSULTANT Name, type of entity (“CONSULTANT”).
RECITALS:
A. CITY wishes to retain the services of an experienced and qualified CONSULTANT to insert brief description of services.
B. In order to obtain the desired services, CITY has circulated its Request for Proposal for insert brief title of RFP, RFP No. insert RFP No. (the “RFP”).
C. CONSULTANT has submitted a Proposal (the “Proposal”) in response to the RFP. In its Proposal CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform those services requested in the RFP. Based upon its review of all proposals submitted in response to the RFP, CITY is willing to award this Agreement to CONSULTANT.
AGREEMENT:
1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT will provide the services and install those materials listed in CONSULTANT’s Proposal submitted in response to the RFP. A copy of the RFP is attached as Exhibit A. A copy of the Proposal is attached as Exhibit B.
CONSULTANT warrants that all work and services set forth in the Proposal will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner.
2. TERM
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Paragraph 4 below, this Agreement will continue in full force and effect from the Effective Date through .
3. COMPENSATION
A. CONSULTANT’s Fee.
For services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT will be paid in accordance with the Compensation Schedule set forth in the Proposal; provided, however, that in no event will the total amount of money paid CONSULTANT, for services initially contemplated by this Agreement, exceed the sum of $insert dollar amount (“Agreement Sum”), unless otherwise first approved in writing by CITY.
B. Schedule of Payment.
Provided that CONSULTANT is not in default under the terms of this Agreement, upon presentation of an invoice, CONSULTANT will be paid 36 Document1 2
the fees described in Paragraph 3.A. above, according to the Compensation Schedule. Payment will be due within 30 days after the date of the invoice.
4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. Termination by CITY for Convenience.
1. CITY may, at any time, terminate the Agreement for CITY’s convenience and without cause.
2. Upon receipt of written notice from CITY of such termination for CITY’s convenience, CONSULTANT will:
a. cease operations as directed by CITY in the notice;
b. take actions necessary, or that CITY may direct, for the protection and preservation of the work; and
c. except for work directed to be performed prior to the effective date of termination stated in the notice, terminate all existing subcontracts and purchase orders and enter into no further subcontracts and purchase orders.
3. In case of termination for CITY’s convenience, CONSULTANT will be entitled to receive payment for work executed, together with costs incurred by reason of the termination, along with reasonable overhead and profit on work not executed.
B. Termination for Cause.
1. If either party fails to perform any term, covenant or condition in this Agreement and that failure continues for 15 calendar days after the nondefaulting party gives the defaulting party written notice of the failure to perform, this Agreement may be terminated for cause; provided, however, that if during the notice period the defaulting party has promptly commenced and continues diligent efforts to remedy the default, the defaulting party will have such additional time as is reasonably necessary to remedy the default.
2. In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the default of CONSULTANT, CITY may, at the expense of CONSULTANT
and its surety, complete this Agreement or cause it to be completed. Any check or bond delivered to the CITY in connection with this Agreement, and the money payable thereon, will be forfeited to and remain the property of the CITY. All moneys due CONSULTANT under the terms of this Agreement will be retained by CITY, but the retention will not release CONSULTANT and its surety from liability for the default. Under these circumstances, however, CONSULTANT and its surety will be credited with the amount of money retained, toward any amount by which the cost of 37 Document1 3
completion exceeds the Agreement Sum and any amount
authorized for extra services.
3. Termination for cause will not affect or terminate any of the rights of CITY as against CONSULTANT or its surety then existing, or that may thereafter accrue because of the default; this provision is in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the CITY under law.
C. Termination for Breach of Law.
In the event CONSULTANT or any of its officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, subsidiaries or affiliates is convicted (i) of a criminal offense as an incident to obtaining or attempting to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or in the performance of a contract or subcontract; (ii) under state or federal statutes of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that currently, seriously, and directly affects responsibility as a public consultant or CONSULTANT; (iii) under state or federal antitrust statutes arising out of the submission of bids or proposals; or (iv) of violation of Paragraph 19 of this Agreement; or for any other cause CITY determines to be so serious and compelling as to affect CONSULTANT’s responsibility as a public consultant or CONSULTANT, including but not limited to, debarment by another governmental agency, then CITY reserves the unilateral right to terminate this Agreement or to impose such other sanctions (which may include financial sanctions, temporary suspensions or any other condition deemed appropriate short of termination) as it deems proper. CITY will not take action until CONSULTANT has been given notice and an opportunity to present evidence in mitigation.
5. FORCE MAJEURE
If any party fails to perform its obligations because of strikes, lockouts, labor disputes, embargoes, acts of God, inability to obtain labor or materials or reasonable substitutes for labor or materials, governmental restrictions, governmental regulations, governmental control, judicial orders, enemy or hostile governmental action, civil commotion, fire or other casualty, or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the party obligated to perform, then that party’s performance will be excused for a period equal to the period of that cause for failure to perform.
6. RETENTION OF FUNDS
CONSULTANT authorizes CITY to deduct from any amount payable to CONSULTANT (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute or that are necessary to compensate CITY for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by CITY, and all amounts for which CITY may be liable to third parties, by reason of CONSULTANT’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform CONSULTANT’s obligations 38 Document1 4
under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by CONSULTANT, or any indebtedness exists that appears to be the basis for a claim of lien, CITY may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of the withholding, an amount sufficient to cover the claim. The failure of CITY to exercise the right to deduct or to withhold will not, however, affect the obligations of CONSULTANT to insure, indemnify, and protect CITY as elsewhere provided in this Agreement.
7. CITY REPRESENTATIVE
City Representative is designated as the “City Representative,” authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work and services specified in this Agreement and to make all decisions in connection with this Agreement. Whenever approval, directions, or other actions are required by CITY under this Agreement, those actions will be taken by the City Representative, unless otherwise stated. The City Manager has the right to designate another City Representative at any time, by providing notice to CONSULTANT.
8. CONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE(S)
The following principal(s) of CONSULTANT are designated as being the principal(s) and representative(s) of CONSULTANT authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified in this Agreement and make all decisions in connection with this Agreement:
Representative 1
Representative 2
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT is, and at all times will remain as to CITY, a wholly independent contractor. Neither CITY nor any of its agents will have control over the conduct of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT’s employees, except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement. CONSULTANT’s agents and employees are not and shall not be considered employees of CITY for any purpose. CONSULTANT may not, at any time or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of CITY. CITY has no duty, obligation, or responsibility to CONSULTANT’s agents or employees under the Affordable Care Act. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for any tax penalties associated with the failure to offer affordable coverage to its agents and employees under the Affordable Care Act and any other liabilities, claims and obligations regarding compliance with the Affordable Care Act with respect to CONSULTANT’s agents and employees. CITY is not responsible and shall not be held liable for CONSULTANT’s failure to comply with CONSULTANT’s duties, obligations, and responsibilities under the Affordable Care Act. CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold CITY harmless for any and all taxes and penalties that may be assessed against CITY as a result of CONSULTANT’s obligations under the Affordable Care Act relating to CONSULTANT’s agents and employees.
39 Document1 5
10. BUSINESS LICENSE
CONSULTANT must obtain a City business license prior to the start of work under this Agreement, unless CONSULTANT is qualified for an exemption.
11. OTHER LICENSES AND PERMITS
CONSULTANT warrants that it has all professional, contracting and other permits and licenses required to undertake the work contemplated by this Agreement.
12. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK
By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT (a) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services required under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of the services set forth in this Agreement.
Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that will materially affect the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement, CONSULTANT must immediately inform CITY of that fact and may not proceed except at CONSULTANT’s risk until written instructions are received from CITY.
13. CARE OF WORK
CONSULTANT must adopt reasonable methods during the term of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and other components to prevent losses or damages, and will be responsible for all damages to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by CITY, except those losses or damages as may be caused by CITY’s own negligence.
14. CONSULTANT’S ACCOUNTING RECORDS; OTHER PROJECT RECORDS Records of CONSULTANT’s time pertaining to the project, and records of accounts between CITY and CONSULTANT, will be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis. CONSULTANT will also maintain all other records, including without limitation, specifications, drawings, progress reports and the like, relating to the work and services identified in Exhibit A. All records will be available to CITY during normal working hours. CONSULTANT will maintain these records for three years after final payment.
15. INDEMNIFICATION
CONSULTANT will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Torrance, the City Council, each member thereof, present and future, members of boards and commissions, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively “City Affiliates”) from and against any and all liability, expenses, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damages whatsoever, including, but not limited to, those arising from breach of contract, bodily injury, death, personal injury, property damage, loss of use, or property loss however the same may be caused and regardless of the responsibility for negligence. The obligation to 40 Document1 6
indemnify, defend and hold harmless includes, but is not limited to, any liability or expense, including defense costs and legal fees, arising from the negligent acts or omissions, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, subCONSULTANTs or vendors. CONSULTANT’s obligations to indemnify, defend and hold harmless will apply even in the event of concurrent negligence on the part of City Affiliates, except for liability resulting solely from the negligence or willful misconduct of City Affiliates. Payment by CITY is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this indemnity. In the event of any dispute between CONSULTANT and CITY, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence of City Affiliates, CONSULTANT will be obligated to pay for the defense of City Affiliates until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City Affiliates as solely negligent. CONSULTANT will not be entitled in the event of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and costs of litigation.
16. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
No officer or employee of CITY will be personally liable to CONSULTANT, in the event of any default or breach by the CITY or for any amount that may become due to CONSULTANT.
17. INSURANCE
A. CONSULTANT and its subCONSULTANTs must maintain for the duration of the Agreement at their sole expense the following insurance, which will be full coverage not subject to self-insurance provisions:
1. Automobile Liability, including owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, with at least the following limits of liability:
a. Primary Bodily Injury with limits of at least $500,000 per person, $1,000,000 per occurrence; and
b. Primary Property Damage of at least $250,000 per
occurrence; or
c. Combined single limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence.
2. Commercial General Liability including coverage for premises, products and completed operations, independent
CONSULTANTs/vendors, personal injury and contractual
obligations with combined single limits of coverage of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 aggregate.
///
///
41 Document1 7
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and, if workers' compensation is required, employer's liability insurance with minimum limits of ($1,000,000) per occurrence or occupational illness. The Workers' Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the CITY for all work performed by the CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subconsultants.
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT’S profession, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $4,000,000 aggregate.
B. The insurance provided by CONSULTANT will be primary and non- contributory.
C. CITY, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Torrance, the City Council and each member thereof, members of boards and commissions, every officer, agent, official, employee and volunteer must be named as additional insureds under the automobile and general liability policies.
D. CONSULTANT must provide certificates of insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) indicating appropriate coverage, to the City Clerk of the City of Torrance before the commencement of work.
E. Each insurance policy required by this Paragraph must contain a provision that no termination, cancellation or change of coverage can be made without notice to the CITY.
F. If the CONSULTANT maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the CONSULTANT. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY.
G. The procuring of insurance shall not be construed as a limitation on liability nor as full performance of the indemnification provisions of the CONSULTANT.
H. Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
a. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 42 Document1 8
c. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made poli cy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Vendor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.
I. CONSULTANT hereby grants to CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
J. Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY.
The CITY may require the CONSULTANT to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY.
18. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURERS
Insurance required by this Agreement will be satisfactory only if issued by companies admitted to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless these requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of CITY (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. In the event the Risk Manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to CITY, the CONSULTANT agrees that the minimum limits of any insurance policies or performance bonds required by this Agreement may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager; provided that CONSULTANT will have the right to appeal a determination of increased coverage by the Risk Manager to the City Council of CITY within 10 days of receipt of notice from the Risk Manager.
19. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
A. No officer or employee of the CITY may have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor may any officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement that affects the officer or employee’s financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which the officer or employee is, directly or indirectly interested, in violation of any law, rule or regulation.
B. No person may offer, give, or agree to give any officer or employee or former officer or employee, nor may any officer or employee solicit, demand, accept, or agree to accept from another person, a gratuity or an offer of employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, preparation or any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the content of any 43 Document1 9
specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any way pertaining to any program requirement, contract or subcontract, or to any solicitation or proposal.
20. NOTICE
A. All notices, requests, demands, or other communications under this Agreement will be in writing. Notice will be sufficiently given for all purposes as follows:
1. Personal delivery. When personally delivered to the recipient, notice is effective on delivery.
2. First Class mail. When mailed first class to the last address of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective three mail delivery days after deposit in a United States Postal Service office or mailbox.
3. Certified mail. When mailed certified mail, return receipt requested, notice is effective on receipt, if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt.
4. Overnight delivery. When delivered by an overnight delivery service, charges prepaid or charged to the sender’s account, notice is effective on delivery, if delivery is confirmed by the delivery service.
5. Facsimile transmission. When sent by fax to the last fax number of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective on receipt. Any notice given by fax will be deemed received on the next business day if it is received after 5:00 p.m. (recipient’s time) or on a non-business day.
6. Addresses for purpose of giving notice are as follows:
CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT’S NAME AND
ADDRESS
Fax: INSERT FAX NUMBER
CITY: City Clerk
City of Torrance
3031 Torrance Boulevard
Torrance, CA 90503
Fax: (310) 618-2931
B. Any correctly addressed notice that is refused, unclaimed, or undeliverable because of an act or omission of the party to be notified, will be deemed effective as of the first date the notice was refused, unclaimed 44 Document1 10
or deemed undeliverable by the postal authorities, messenger or overnight delivery service.
C. Either party may change its address or fax number by giving the other party notice of the change in any manner permitted by this Agreement.
21. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement and all exhibits are binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties. The Agreement may not be assigned or subcontracted by either CITY or CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of the other.
22. INTEGRATION; AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained in it. No prior oral or written understanding will be of any force or effect with respect to the terms of this Agreement. The Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both parties.
23. INTERPRETATION
The terms of this Agreement should be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and should not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or by any other rule of construction that might otherwise apply. To the extent that the terms of the RFP or Proposal are inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
24. SEVERABILITY
If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, that part will be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with any applicable laws, but the remainder of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
25. TIME OF ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
26. GOVERNING LAW; JURISDICTION
This Agreement will be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Jurisdiction of any litigation arising from the Agreement will be in Los Angeles County, California.
27. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTES AND REGULATIONS
CONSULTANT will be knowledgeable of and will comply with all applicable federal, state, county and city statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances and orders.
28. WAIVER OF BREACH
No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a nondefaulting party on any default will impair the right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
A party’s consent or approval of any act by the other party requiring the first party’s consent or approval will not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by 45 Document1 11
either party of any default must be in writing and will not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
29. ATTORNEY’S FEES
Except as provided for in Paragraph 15, in any dispute, litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding by which one party either seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement (whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing party will be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees, together with any costs and expenses, to resolve the dispute and to enforce any judgment.
30. EXHIBITS
All exhibits identified in this Agreement are incorporated into the Agreement by this reference.
31. CONSULTANT’S AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT warrant that (i) CONSULTANT is duly organized and existing; (ii) they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT; (iii) by so executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement; and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which CONSULTANT is bound.
32. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
Any documents submitted by the CONSULTANT; all information obtained in connection with the CITY’s right to audit and inspect the CONSULTANT’s documents, books, and accounting records pursuant to paragraph 14 CONSULTANT’s Accounting Records; Other Project Records; as well as those documents which were required to be submitted in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) used in the solicitation process for this Contract become the exclusive property of the City. All such documents become a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public records. Exceptions will be those elements in the California Government Code Section 7920.000 et seq. (Public Records Act) and which are marked “trade secret”, “confidential”, or “proprietary”.
The CITY shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records including, without limitation, those so marked, if disclosure is required by law, or by an order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction.
///
///
///
///
///
///
46 Document1 12
In the event the CITY is required to defend an action on a Public Records Act request for any of the aforementioned documents, information, books, records, and/or contents of a proposal marked “trade secret”, “confidential”, or “proprietary”, the CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify the CITY from all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, in action or liability arising under the Public Records Act.
CITY OF TORRANCE,
a municipal corporation
_______________________________
George K. Chen, Mayor
Firm Name
Type of Entity
By:________________________________
Signer
Title
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Rebecca Poirier, MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN
City Attorney
By: ____________________________
Attachments: Exhibit A Request for Proposals
Exhibit B Proposal
Rev. 0424
47 EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
[To be attached]
48 EXHIBIT B
PROPOSAL
[To be attached]
49 EXHIBIT B
BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC.’S PROPOSAL
[To be attached]
50 City of Torrance
Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis (B2024-15), bidding on 12/16/2024 12:00 PM (PST)
Printed 12/16/2024
PlanetBids
51 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
1 BV BUILDING & INFRASTRUCTURE, FACILITIES DIVISION
PROPOSALPROPOSAL
CITY OF TORRANCECITY OF TORRANCE
RFP NO. B2024-15 - EXPEDITED PLAN CHECK SERVICES RFP NO. B2024-15 - EXPEDITED PLAN CHECK SERVICES
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON AN AS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON AN AS
NEEDED BASISNEEDED BASIS
FOR THE CITY OF TORRANCE
Sally Kyung, Purchasing
3031 Torrance Blvd
Torrance, California 90503
P: 310.618.5936
E: [email protected]
CONTACTS REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL
Craig Baptista, Vice President - West, Plan Check & Inspection Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150
Westlake Village, CA 91362
O. 916.514.4516 | C. 916.291.9151
E. [email protected]
December 16, 2024
Proposal No. 10120785
52 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
1 Vendor’s Response – Section III
December 16, 2024
Sally Kyung, Purchasing
City of Torrance
3031 Torrance Blvd
Torrance, California 90503
RE: RFP No. B2024-15 - Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis Dear Ms. Kyung,
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (BV) is pleased to submit our qualifications to provide Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis for the City of Torrance (City). Our proposal will highlight previous experience in providing similar services to nearby jurisdictions. We have the breadth and depth of resources, skills and expertise needed to provide the requested services for the City. We have served nearly 200 agencies with building plan review and related services throughout California over the course of 49 years. In addition, we have an established relationship with the City of Torrance in providing plan review services to the City’s Public Works Department in 2020.
We are keenly aware of the desire for high-quality customer service, timely reviews, reliability, responsiveness and cost-effective solutions. Our commitment to provide accurate and appropriate solutions to our clients and our ability to quickly and efficiently meet the needs of the communities that we serve makes BV an ideal partner for the City of Torrance. We offer optimal solutions to deliver quality services, including:
▪ Unparalleled plan review and related building safety services by licensed and certified professionals ▪ Proven experience in serving jurisdictions in coastal communities and throughout California ▪ Established relationships to ensure timely reviews, transparency and responsiveness ▪ Depth of resources to maximize flexibility and deliver quality services ▪ Electronic review and best practices to consistently meet turnaround schedules A unique feature of Bureau Veritas is that the whole company is subject to the high standards of the ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System. This system is applied to our entire operation and periodic audits certify the company continues to be in full compliance. This assures our clients that wherever our services are provided, they will be accurately prepared and the deliverables will be received in a timely manner.
The designated Project Manager for the provision of services will be Joe Chao, P .E., Regional Manager. Craig Baptista, Vice President, West - Plan Check & Inspection is your point-of-contact with legal authority to bind the terms of the contract.
Mr. Baptista has read, understood and agreed to all statements and conditions in this RFP and acknowledges receipt of all addenda. No addenda were issued for this RFP .
BV looks forward to an expanded successful, professional relationship with the City of Torrance by providing excellent Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis , promoting transparency in our work, and exceeding your expectations.
Sincerely,
Craig Baptista, M.B.A.
Vice President, West - Plan Check & Inspection
250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150
Westlake Village, CA 91362
O. 916.514.4516 | C: 916.291.9151
E. [email protected]
53 VENDOR’S RESPONSE –
SECTION III
54 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
3 Vendor’s Response – Section III
9 RFP No. B2024-15 RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis
SECTION III PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
FAILURE TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS IN THIS SECTION MAY INVALIDATE PROPOSAL.
In accordance with your "Request for Proposals (RFP)", the following proposal is submitted to the City of Torrance.
RFP Submitted By:
________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Company
________________________________________________________________________________ Street Address City Zip Code
________________________________________ _____________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number
________________________________________ _____________________________________ Printed Name/Title E-Mail Address
________________________________________ ___________________________________ Signature Date
Form of Business Organization: Please indicate the following (check one).
Corporation Partnership Sole Proprietorship Other: ___________________________
Do you have a Parent Company? No Yes, ___________________________________ (Name of Parent Company)
Do you have any Subsidiaries? No Yes, ___________________________________ (Name of Subsidiary Company)
Business History:
Years in business under your current name and form of business organization? ________ Years If less than three (3) years and your company was in business under a different name, what was that name?
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
Contact for Additional Information:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company to contact for any additional information:
________________________________________ __________________________________ Printed Name Title
________________________________________ __________________________________ Telephone E-Mail Address
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
220 Technology Drive, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618
916.514.4516 916.725.8242
Craig Baptista, Vice President-West, Plan Check & Inspection [email protected] 12/11/24
Bureau Veritas S.A. (BVSA)
17 N/A
Joe Chao, P.E. Regional Manager, Plan Check & Inspection 805-358-4246 [email protected]
55 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
4 Vendor’s Response – Section III
10 Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Payment Terms: The City of Torrance Payment terms are Net 30. The City does not make pre- payments, or pay upon receipt.
Do you offer any discounted invoice terms? _____________________________
Project Start and Completion:
The City requires the project to start as soon as possible from the award of a contract and the project completed as soon as possible. Specific periods that are mutually agreed upon will be established after award of a contract.
Project Manager:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company who will serve as Project Manager for this contract.
_________________________________________ __________________________________ Name Title
_______________________ __________________ ____________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
Contract Representative:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company who will be responsible for administering this contract.
____________________________________________ _________________________________ Name Title
_______________________ __________________ _________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
No
Joe Chao, P.E. Regional Manager, Plan Check & Inspection 805-358-4246 916.725.8242 [email protected]
Joe Chao, P.E.
805-358-4246 916.725.8242
Regional Manager, Plan Check & Inspection
[email protected]
56 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
5 Vendor’s Response – Section III
11 Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Sub Contractors:
If awarded, will you be using sub contractors to carry out the scope of work required in this RFP?
Yes, we will be using sub contractors and have listed their contact information below.
No, we will not be using any sub contractors for this project.
_______________________ __________________ ______________________________ Company Name Contact Name Title
_______________________ __________________ ________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
Please explain the working relationship between your company and the sub contractor.
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
Geo-Advantec, Inc. Shawn Ariannia, Ph.D., P.E., G.E., President (909) 305-0400 Ext. 102 (909) 907-0704 [email protected] GeoAdvantec (GAI) is a privately held Small Business Enterprise (SBE), providing a full range of high-quality geotechnical engineering, engineering geology, earthquake engineering, soils, and materials testing, and during construction testing and inspection services for projects of various magnitudes and scope.
GAI is committed to providing competent and timely services, relying on the background and talent of its staff.
Our highly qualified team of engineers delivers decades of practical experience and knowledge of the most recent methods in various disciplines. The team assures the highest level of practice standards to maintain clients’trust by providing accurate analyses, reliable data, and informed recommendations.
GeoAdvantec will be used to support geotechnical reviews as needed. 57 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
6 Vendor’s Response – Section III
12 Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects:
In the space below, please provide a narrative explaining your background and recent experience with similar projects as the scope of work identified in this RFP. (Please attach additional sheet if needed.)
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
Please refer to the following pages for our Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects. 58 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
7 Vendor’s Response – Section III
FIRM PROFILE
Bureau Veritas (BV) is a multi-national corporation with a history which includes 196 years of providing worldwide regulatory compliance service to industry and governmental agencies. Founded in 1828, Bureau Veritas is a global leader in quality assurance, health, safety, and environmental (QHSE) solutions. Recognized and accredited by the largest national and international organizations and with over 82,000 employees, Bureau Veritas has unparalleled resources to manage projects requiring a broad range of expertise across vast geographies. With operations in 140 countries and all continents, BV draws on the synergies between its local teams and dedicated technical centers worldwide.
Within the United States, Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., a Delaware corporation founded in 2003, is recognized as being the largest code compliance firm in the nation with over 4,000 employees working out of 100+ offices. We have a long- established presence in California in providing similar services for multiple jurisdictions throughout the State.
BV will always strive to deliver excellent service in meeting and exceeding the City’s expectations regarding all agreed upon turnaround times. Our proposed program establishes a process to ensure that the City will receive only the highest quality plan reviews. We will provide these services to the City with the objective of verifying compliance with the City’s adopted civil codes, zoning ordinances, drainage regulations and other adopted ordinances, policies and standards, as well as other relevant program standards and requirements.
The firm has specific experience working through a variety of challenges including infill commercial development, adaptive reuse and change of occupancies of existing buildings, retrofit of un-reinforced masonry or soft-story buildings, large commercial shopping centers and mixed-use multi-family developments, live-work projects, and high tech, research and development facilities. The firm’s range of experience covers every key area of service defining an engineering department. The firm is skilled at helping existing departments augment or refine their current level of client service and is also capable of crafting a department from the ground up.
BV’s professional staff evaluates all city, state, and federal requirements applicable to the project before beginning services. BV anticipates needs and responds with specific, immediate solutions to the challenges associated with
development projects. The firm’s professional members are dedicated to meeting a high standard of public service which is crucial to effective delivery of engineering and planning regulatory services. Consistency, responsiveness, efficiency, and a positive attitude are key components of our approach.
PUTTING THE RIGHT PEOPLE TO WORK FOR YOU
As the largest plan review firm in the United States, we have a large breadth of personnel available and immediately
accessible to provide to the City. Located throughout California, we have more than 100 licensed and certified engineers
and certified plans examiners who are equipped to handle the City’s needs. Our local presence in providing services throughout Los Angeles County and the coastal communities allows us to provide timely delivery and exceptional customer service in the most cost-effective manner. Our longtime presence in California allow us to tailor solutions specifically to the City’s request. We bring a cooperative and creative problem solving approach to plan review. We fully understand our role as a team member committed to achieving successful projects for the City and its customers. The firm has the capacity to seamlessly augment its staffing and resources, if needed, to ensure a project is appropriately supported and effectively fulfilled.
PAST EXPERIENCE OF THE STAFF
BV and our proposed, locally-based staff for this contract have a long-established history working for the nearby municipalities to perform plan check services as needed. Some projects to note include the County of Los Angeles, City of Redondo Beach, City of Malibu, City of Monrovia, City of Newport Beach, and City of Corona.
Consequently, we can leverage a breadth of expertise to meet the needs of the City, and offer highly qualified engineering as well as ICC and CASp certified staff who are in close proximity to quickly respond to the City’s requests.
BV’s team is intimately familiar with the policies and procedures necessary to maintain a thriving building department,
select and manage personnel from administrative to key
management positions, and use creative and leading-edge approaches to reach successful solutions to tough problems.
Since the firm’s back office deals with the public, they always display good interpersonal skills and listening skills, which are needed for assessing and understanding customers’ needs.
BV’s management team is dedicated to serving the City and providing the resources necessary to ensure successful
plan checking services and other related services. The firm’s management team will directly oversee the review of submittal documents, bulletins, and change orders to assess compliance with the regulations contained in the various construction codes, and recommend action with respect to the permit
process.
STAYING CURRENT ON FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, OR
MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS
Our improvement plan checking process encompasses a
comprehensive review of various project types. Plans are meticulously examined to ensure compliance with local and other applicable ordinances and standards, including those set by City, County, State, and Federal agencies.
59 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
8 Vendor’s Response – Section III
Additionally, we rigorously evaluate plans for sound
engineering practices, accuracy of design in alignment with the City’s Plan Check Lists, and adherence to general mathematics and design criteria. Any discrepancies or potential issues are promptly identified, and we may request redesign if necessary to address concerns related to engineering integrity, public safety, or practical construction feasibility.
Our team is dedicated to remaining up-to-date on all relevant regulations and guidelines. We continuously monitor changes and updates in laws, codes, and standards at all levels of government to ensure our plan checking processes are in compliance and reflect the latest industry practices. The Project Manager maintains regular communication with not only the design team but all applicable stakeholders regarding any federal, state, and/or county updates which could impact a particular project. These open lines of communication assist in facilitating transparency and making sure all parties involved have a comprehensive understanding of the federal standards.
CERTIFIED AND ACCREDITED TO HIGH STANDARDS
Bureau Veritas is recognized and accredited by major national and international organizations. More than any other company, Bureau Veritas must be exemplary in Quality, Health, Safety and Environment (QHSE). Being a recognized leader in these fields and thus having these competencies in its DNA, BV is continuously improving internal processes to better protect the health and safety of its employees, while also minimizing its impact on the environment and delivering added-value services to its clients. To demonstrate its commitment to high standards, Bureau Veritas was audited by independent third parties to achieve the ISO 9001:2015 Certification.
/gid00050/gid00054/gid00034/gid00045/gid00042/gid00053/gid00058/gid00001/gid00034/gid00052/gid00052/gid00054/gid00051/gid00034/gid00047/gid00036/gid00038/gid00001/gid00046/gid00034/gid00047/gid00034/gid00040/gid00038/gid00046/gid00038/gid00047/gid00053 /gid00042/gid00052/gid00048
/gid00026/gid00017/gid00017/gid00018/gid00038/gid00047/gid00055/gid00042/gid00051/gid00048/gid00047/gid00046/gid00038/gid00047/gid00053/gid00034/gid00045/gid00001/gid00046/gid00034/gid00047/gid00034/gid00040/gid00038/gid00046/gid00038/gid00047/gid00053 /gid00042/gid00052/gid00048
/gid00018/gid00021/gid00017/gid00017/gid00018
/gid00048/gid00036/gid00036/gid00054/gid00049/gid00034/gid00053/gid00042/gid00048/gid00047/gid00034/gid00045/gid00001/gid00041/gid00038/gid00034/gid00045/gid00053/gid00041/gid00001/gid00007/gid00001/gid00052/gid00034/gid00039/gid00038/gid00053/gid00058 /gid00048/gid00052/gid00041/gid00034/gid00052
/gid00018/gid00025/gid00017/gid00017/gid00018
ISO 9001:2015 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFIED
ISO 9001:2015 specifies requirements for a quality management system where an organization:
• Needs to demonstrate its ability to consistently provide service that meets customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, and
• Aims to enhance customer satisfaction through the effective application of the system, including processes for
continual improvement of the system and the assurance
of conformity to customer and applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements
• Bureau Veritas achieved ISO 9001 in 2007 and is
audited annually.
60 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
9 Vendor’s Response – Section III
RELEVANT PROJECTS AND EXPERIENCE
Below are highlights of our experience in serving California jurisdictions with similar services with the delivery of building plan review and other building and safety services on other projects. Our team has a deep breadth of experience with all applicable industry standards and any relevant federal, state, or local requirements.
BUILDING PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION
County of Los Angeles
CITY CONTACT: JUAN MADRIGAL, S.E., BUILDING OFFICIAL
ADDRESS: 900 S FREMONT AVE, ALHAMBRA, CA 91803
EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 626.458.6385
DATES OF SERVICE: 2003 - PRESENT
CONTRACT VALUE: $18,000,000 NTE (AGGREGATE-CURRENT CONTRACT) Since 2003, BV has been providing inspection services and building and safety plan review to Los Angeles County.
The firm has placed plan check personnel in the County’s Alhambra headquarters. These staff members have provided code consulting and training for the County’s structural, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical plan review sections, including creating and preparing instruction manuals, presenting training workshops, and providing as-needed field inspection expertise to agency plan check and field personnel County-wide. Prominent projects the firm has worked on with the County include the University of Southern California Medial Center Replacement, Antelope Valley Courthouse, Hollywood Bowl Shell Rehabilitation, Palmdale Sheriff’s Station, Sun Valley Health Center, Santa Monica Courthouse, The Alondra Pool and Skate Park, and the Quartz Public Library.
BUILDING PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION
City of Redondo Beach
CITY CONTACT: LORENA SOULES, CBO, CASP , BUILDING OFFICIAL ADDRESS: 415 DIAMOND ST , REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277
EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 310.318.0636
DATES OF SERVICE: 2021 - PRESENT
CONTRACT VALUE: $335,000 NTE
BV has provided plan check and inspection services to the City of Redondo Beach since 2021. Plan reviews for commercial, industrial, and complex residential projects include architectural, structural, grading, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, accessibility, Calgreen, energy plans, calculations, reports, and specifications for compliance.
Accessibility plans are reviewed by CASp. The firm provides ICC certified, experienced inspectors to conduct inspections of all phases of construction to ensure compliance with approved plans, laws, regulations, codes, ordinances, policies, and rules, including but not limited to, those relating to structural integrity, fire and life safety, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, energy conservation, accessibility, grading and site work. 61 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
10 Vendor’s Response – Section III
BUILDING PLAN CHECK, INSPECTION &
PERMITTING
City of Monrovia
CITY CONTACT: GREG BOYAJIAN, BUILDING & SAFETY MANAGER
ADDRESS: 415 S IVY AVE, MONROVIA, CA 91016
EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 626.932.5532
DATES OF SERVICE: 2020 - PRESENT
CONTRACT VALUE: TIME & MATERIALS
BV was selected BV has provided on-call plan review, inspection, and consulting services to the City of Monrovia since late 2020. BV reviews plans calculations, reports and specifications for compliance with the most recently adopted Federal, State, and City codes and ordinances. The firm also performs building, combination, and other trade inspections on an as needed, assigned or regular basis on residential, commercial industrial, and large Multifamily/Mixed use projects, and performs permit counter work as needed to enforce compliance with the conditions of approval, provisions of the City’s Building laws and the code requirements set forth on the approved plans for which the City issued a permit. Inspectors and permit technicians are available within 24 hours notice.
PLAN CHECK AND PERMIT SERVICES
FOR POST FIRE RECOVERY/REBUILD
City of Malibu
CITY CONTACT: YOLANDA BUNDY, PE, CBO, BUILDING OFFICIAL ADDRESS: 23825 STUART RANCH ROAD, MALIBU, CA 90265
EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 310.456.2489, EXT . 229
DATES OF SERVICE: 2019 - PRESENT
CONTRACT VALUE: TIME AND MATERIALS
CONTRACT VALUE: $90,000 NTE (CURRENT CONTRACT)
BV has completed plan review and inspection of various building types for the City of Malibu, including playing an instrumental role in the fire recovery efforts in the wake of the 2018 Woolsey Fires. Due to the community’s geographical location along the Santa Monica Mountains, Malibu falls in the high fire severity zone and special high wind region. The community is also subject to coastal grading, increasing the impact of high waves. Special construction considerations are needed to address these conditions. BV was tasked with plan reviews, including architectural—structural, grading, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing—of single-family homes and commercial buildings throughout the City of Malibu, as well as set up and staffing of a special permit center to help quickly meet the needs of the community in the rebuilding efforts. BV helped to facilitate and fully staff a Fire Disaster Recovery Permit Center to rebuild more than 450 structures destroyed in the fires. The BV team has performed comprehensive plan reviews for the City of Malibu and addressed the City’s risky geographical conditions, which resulted in the need for septic systems and specialized training. BV inspection services have also been provided to cover a temporary leave of absence, which extended to a longer assignment. Key Team Members: Tom Harris, Joe Chao, Armil Allahyarian, Matthew Torosian, Joe Medina 62 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
11 Vendor’s Response – Section III
PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION SERVICES
City of Newport Beach
CITY CONTACT: TONEE THAI, PE, CBO, CASP ,
DEPUTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIR. / BUILDING OFFICIAL
ADDRESS: 100 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 949.718.1867
DATES OF SERVICE: JULY 2022 - PRESENT
CONTRACT VALUE: $165,000 NTE
BV has been providing services to the City of Newport Beach since July 2022, including building plan review and inspection of residential, commercial and industrial buildings for compliance with the City-adopted codes, including California Building and Residential Codes, Green Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, and Electrical Code; The City of Newport Beach Municipal Code; and State Energy Conservation requirements. The scope of services also include fire plan review for residential, commercial and industrial projects, as well as review of soils reports, grading plans, surveys and erosion control plans.
PLAN REVIEW, PERMIT PROCESSING, CODE
ENFORCEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES
City of Corona
CITY CONTACT: CHRIS MILOSEVIC, BUILDING OFFICIAL
ADDRESS: 400 VICENTIA AVENUE, CORONA, CA 92882
EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 951.736.2250
DATES OF SERVICE: 2010 - PRESENT
CONTRACT VALUE: TIME AND MATERIALS
BV is currently providing building plan check, building inspection, code enforcement and counter technician services for residential and commercial properties. We also provide on-site extension of staff as necessary, including a registered civil engineer to assist with an immediate need for building plan check. BV assists the City in providing plan review services for small residential solar energy projects. Our team utilizes a web-based system to take in projects electronically. Plans are then reviewed within 24 hours and comments are returned to the applicants. This system assists the City in meeting the requirements of AB 2188 for fast turnaround of these small solar energy projects.
Projects include:
Main Street Metro Urban Development - BV provides building plan review services for this new development in the City of Corona. This is a new mixed-use development that will bring 464 new one and two bedroom apartments, 77,000 sf of retail and restaurants, 683-1,280sf homes, two pools and spas, a dog park, and a sky deck with barbecue and bar area. Additionally, our team reviewed parking structures A, B, and C for this project. Parking structure A is a five tier open parking garage spanning 112,740 square feet. Parking structure B is a four tier open parking garage consisting of 109,543 square feet of parking space and 8,997 square feet of assembly use on the top. Parking structure C is a five tier parking garage that includes 169,714 square feet of parking space. 63 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
12 Vendor’s Response – Section III
13 Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Work Plan for Each Required Task:
In the space below, please describe in detail the methodology you will be utilizing to conduct for each task. (Please attach additional sheets if needed.)
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
Please refer to the following pages for our work plan and methodology. 64 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
13 Vendor’s Response – Section III
WORK PLAN
BV has an understanding of the Expedited Plan Check
Services on an As-Needed Basis issued by the City of
Torrance and will be able to administer all of the duties and responsibilities set forth in the RFP .
BV is committed to delivering a thorough and tailored
approach to the technical work that responds to the
City’s particular issues and needs. Our highly qualified team will seamlessly assist the City in reviewing a
variety of building plans in accordance with applicable building codes, including the California Building
Standards Code, inclusive, structural calculations, Title 24 reports, accessibility, and fire/life safety standards on a variety of plans, including commercial and residential development, as well as public facilities. This also
includes preliminary review of discretionary applications.
BV understands that the City of Torrance is seeking
consultants to assist the Community Development
Department in managing the day-to day building code
plan checking needs of the City and its citizens. We
understand and will adhere to the following:
▪ Plans will be checked according to all applicable
codes and statutes as well as project Conditions
of Approval from other City departments. All
plans will be stamped and signed off if they
meet all such requirements, and all changes/
corrections must be identified and addressed
prior to approval.
▪ All plan review services will be performed by a
licensed design professional (State of California)
and certified individuals with extensive
experience in plan review. All staff utilized by
BV are appropriately licensed, registered, and
certified as required by the State of California and
the City to perform each of the specific scopes of
work.
▪ BV will review all plan check applications for
accuracy and make all necessary revisions to
such items as description, valuation, square
footage, type of construction, and use. All plan
review correction materials including marked
up plans, documents, and plan check correction
lists will be provided in the City desired format
to the City representative immediately upon
completion of the plan review at no extra charge
to City. This process includes pickup and delivery
of the submitted plans.
▪ BV will provide plan check status reports and
statistical reports upon request of City in the
format type requested by the City (paper or
electronic). The information requested may
include such information as project name,
address, description, square footage, and type
of construction, type of review(s) performed,
hour(s) required per review, reviewer name,
reviewer credentials and turnaround time of plan
review(s).
▪ BV will be available to attend pre-submittal and
design discussion meetings with the permit
applicant as requested by the City. We understand
that these meetings shall be compensated at the
rate of one (1) hour of straight-time compensation
and do not include travel time.
▪ BV can provide electronic plan check services.
▪ Joe Chao, P .E., Regional Manager will be the
contact for all communication with the City.
▪ BV can provide plan review at the City upon
request and will provide all necessary materials
and resources to assigned personnel sufficient to
perform their works.
65 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
14 Vendor’s Response – Section III
PROJECT METHODOLOGY
BV provides full service building department administration including plan review, inspection, and permit technician services for numerous agencies. We offer services which range from reviewing a single, complex, or unique project to handling all plan review needs for a City. The firm’s personnel are dedicated to providing the highest level of customer service and ensuring all work is in conformance with the requirements of the City and all other applicable codes. Resources can be adjusted on fast-track projects, as needed, to meet demanding schedules. Personnel
assigned to City projects are available to attend meetings at the City to address questions or discuss issues with the City staff, design team, and/or construction team which may arise on a project and provide guidance for City
staff, applicants, designers, and contractors. Consistency, responsiveness, efficiency, and a positive attitude are key components of the firm’s approach.
As an ISO 9001 certified firm, BV undergoes systematic, independent audits of its management systems to meet
rigorous objectives and provide continuous improvement
in key areas. The firm consistently incorporates proven best practices and protocols as part of its quality management system to meet and exceed ever-increasing customer
requirements. These tools include implementation of an
established quality assurance/quality control program
using the BV CARE program for the intake, track, and
review of plans to enhance quality and streamline
processing/approval; electronic plan check to expedite
turnaround times which save time and money; and the
utilization of web-based document control system which
fosters collaboration, 24/7 access to documents and
reports, and enhances overall communication.
To ensure the work assignment is being performed at the highest professional level, BV relies on the management and technical excellence of its personnel and a proven
QA/QC program. This assures the quality of all work
performed under this contract meets City approval. BV
has developed and implemented corporate QA policies,
consistent with all applicable federal and state regulatory requirements and standards, covering all aspects of
project performance, technical quality, and peer review.
These policies are implemented at each professional and technical level to provide a well-balanced, independent QA program, which assures the quality of reports,
technical reviews, annuals and other documentation
prepared by BV. This ensures the product is consistent
with the established standards from the standpoint of
quality, validity, and legal defensibility.
▪ Identify Client Needs: Identifying the clients’
requirements and expectations is a key initial
step to BV’s client-focused approach. BV actively
listens and maintains sensitivity to unique issues,
priorities, and organizational culture to work in
partnership to assess diverse needs and special
initiatives.
▪ Strategic Planning: With this partnership, BV
establishes a clear plan of action to institute
priorities, identify stakeholders/processing
agencies, formulate communication protocols,
and align services with mutually-defined needs
and objectives.
▪ Concise Scoping/Implementation: A clear
and concise scope, schedule, and budget are
developed. BV assigns expertise which mirrors
the clients’ needs and implements best practices
to maintain project momentum.
▪ Project Management: Proactive management
ensures cost and schedule control and
streamlined communication among team
members. BV uses appropriate best practice
tools to effectively and efficiently deliver the
City’s assignment within budget and schedule.
No matter what the need, the firm’s goal is to
deliver integrity, impartiality, accountability,
efficiency, quality, and transparency.
PLAN REVIEW SERVICES OVERVIEW
BV has the capacity to provide the following plan review services to the City of Torrance:
▪ Architectural plans examination
▪ Structural plans examination
▪ Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing code plans
examination
▪ Review and approval of alternate materials,
alternative design and methods of construction
▪ Energy code plans examination
66 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
15 Vendor’s Response – Section III
▪ Accessibility requirements including
о Barrier free plans examination requirements
о Disabled access
о CASp
о ADA
▪ Green Building and LEED consulting including:
о LEED submittal consultation
о Green building consulting including CAL Green
о ENERGY STAR verification
о Energy efficiency audits
▪ Solar Review
▪ Shoring Plans Review
▪ Geotechnical Review
Architectural Review
BV blends the knowledge of local conditions with a large pool of California licensed or certified building safety experts equipped to handle all building department
needs. The firm is able to tailor its solutions specific to the City as a result of having provided plan review, inspection services, specialty reviews, and municipal administrative support for over 49 years.
Structural Review
BV is uniquely qualified and experienced in structural
review and inspection. The firm has plan review and
inspection personnel which have specialized experience
with multi-family residential, hotels, resorts, retail, commercial, industrial, high-tech facilities, etc. BV has several experienced structural engineers on staff who are immediately available to tackle the City’s most complex projects. BV can provide a complete structural review of design drawings, details, and calculations for both vertical loads and lateral seismic and wind forces, in accordance with the California Building Code structural provisions.
Mechanical Review
The California Building Code is supported by ancillary
codes such as the California Mechanical Code and any
others specifically designated and adopted by the City.
BV’s staff includes licensed and certified mechanical
engineers and inspectors who have the knowledge,
training, and experience necessary to review plans
for compliance with these codes. Firm staff, who are
available immediately to the City, have reviewed heating, cooling, distribution and return air systems, hoods, and product conveyance system plans for a variety of projects including single family residential, multi family residential, custom homes, resorts, and hotels.
Electrical Review
Electrical review and inspection to verify energy
compliance is included in all projects in accordance
with mandates from the applicable energy standards
for non-residential construction. The firm has licensed and certified electrical engineers and inspectors with
extensive plan review and inspection experience
which have reviewed service installation, transformers, emergency power, panel distribution, single line
diagrams, power, and lighting system plans for single
family residential, multi family residential, custom homes, resorts, and hotels.
Plumbing Review
The California Building Code is supported by ancillary
codes such as the California Plumbing Code and any
others specifically designated and adopted by the City.
BV’s staff has the knowledge, training, and experience
necessary to review plans and inspect construction for
compliance with these codes. The firm has licensed and
certified mechanical engineers on staff to assist with
plumbing reviews when needed. Firm staff have reviewed
fuel gas, medical gas, potable and non-potable water
piping and waste piping systems, and rainwater system
plans for single family residential, multi family residential, custom homes, resorts, and hotels.
CASp / Disabled Access Review
BV has CASp certified individuals who are able to respond to the needs of the City quickly. The firm currently provides CASp certified individuals to jurisdictions throughout
California to meet the requirements of SB 1608.
Additionally, the team includes ICC Certified accessibility plans examiners and inspectors who routinely conduct
accessibility reviews of projects throughout the state from minor restroom upgrades to significant ADA compliance
improvements.
Green Building Review
BV has plan review engineers, plans examiners, and
inspectors who are well versed and experienced with
energy code compliance. Firm staff have been involved
at various levels of energy code development in California and are certified to review and inspect for energy codes.
BV staff have reviewed plans, and inspected projects,
which incorporate new technology, and complex energy
code compliance. The firm has staff available to the City who are CAL Green Certified.
67 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
16 Vendor’s Response – Section III
Civil Engineering Review
BV’s professional staff will familiarize themselves with all city, state, and federal requirements applicable to the project before beginning a review. Requirements for civil infrastructure originate from multiple sources including statutory requirements, local ordinances and design
guidelines, federal requirements including ADA and
NPDES, state requirements, and the requirements of any
affected utilities, districts, or agencies.
Fire Plan Review
BV staff have the capacity to consult closely with the local Fire Department Chief or their designated representative on any areas which require code interpretation or where alternate methods are being proposed and considered.
The firm’s proposed fire plan check engineers have specific experience working with multiple types of facilities to ensure compliance with applicable codes, standards, and amendments, including CFC, CBC, the Adopted National
Fire Protection Standards, the California Health and Safety Codes, CSFM, and U.L. BV’s experience includes written
comments and verbal communication with applicants
to better understand requirements and provide direction for compliance, as well as close communication with fire departments to clarify policies, code interpretations, plan review status, and procedures. BV has reviewed hundreds of projects for fire safety components, including NFPA 13, NFPA 72, and NFPA 101, among others.
Geotechnical Plan Review
Our partner, GeoAdvantec, is highly qualified to provide geotechnical analysis, field, and laboratory testing
management, slope stability and liquefaction analysis,
seismic hazard evaluation, pile and earth retaining
structures design, design and implementation of soils and slope stabilization, repair and retrofit methods relevant to soils, foundation, and structural behavior for different types of constructions.
Plan Review Process
Our team becomes familiar with the requirements of a
public agency before beginning a review and continually monitors trends and legislation in order to advise the
City on ordinances and standard practices to consider
for adoption. BV has extensive public sector experience, which assures that public interests are fully protected.
We understand that careful consideration of issues and
impacts are needed in addition to technical expertise.
We have devoted a great deal of time over the years to
refining our approach and developing documentation to
assist our clients and train our personnel to ensure highly efficient plan review procedures.
BV will work to ensure that submittals are properly
coordinated and tracked by following an established
internal plan check coordination process in which each
plan received for review is entered into our ProTrack
database, processed and returned on time to the client.
Our plan tracking procedures are designed to track each submittal throughout the review process and maintain
accurate and comprehensive records for each submittal.
To accomplish this we:
▪ Screen and log each application to assure that
they are routed to all plan reviewers in a timely
manner.
▪ Submittals are reviewed for compliance with all
ordinances. The log serves as a tracking device
to assure turnaround times and completeness of
the review.
▪ Plan reviews will be done in accordance with local,
state and federal regulations with which local
jurisdictions are mandated to enforce as well as
all codes and ordinances in effect by adoption at
the time of plan review. Preliminary consultations
will be provided to the applicant upon request,
to assist and guide them in the design and plans
preparation process.
▪ Information shown on each permit application
is verified. Construction valuation is based on
information provided by the City of Torrance
and compared to estimates provided by the
applicant.
▪ Provide a thorough architectural and structural
review of design drawings and details for
compliance with the California Building Code
architectural provisions, including provisions
for safety glazing, building security and noise
insulation performance standards, to name a
few. These reviews can also be performed on
revisions to plans which have previously been
approved for permit issuance.
▪ Preparation of a review letter report
▪ Plan review management.
▪ BV assures that corrections are handled as quickly
and as clearly as possible. Our goal is to help the
applicant through the plan review process. All
corrections are identified based on compliance
with specified codes and regulations.
Generally, corrections are identified in two ways. Notes are made on plans during electronic review or on hard copy
plans if appropriate, and a correction sheet is generated, 68 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
17 Vendor’s Response – Section III
detailing what items need to be addressed before plans
can be approved. The City shall approve the development of any customized correction sheets. Correction sheets
for specific projects shall be forwarded to the City along with a cover memo containing at least the following:
▪ The date(s) plans were received and reviewed
▪ The date(s) the applicant was notified of
completed plan reviews
▪ The name and telephone number of the applicant
During the plan review process, BV is prepared to meet
with the applicant or architect/engineer, City employees or consultants at any time. Telephone discussions or
meetings at project sites are welcomed to assure that any plan review issues are handled efficiently. We propose to meet at the offices of the building and safety division or at a particular project site. Our goal is to issue approved plans as quickly as possible but in full compliance
with laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. Upon
completion of the plan review, the following information package is prepared and logged as a minimum:
✓ Completed plan check documents including sign-
offs
✓ Transmittal letter documenting any conditions
associated with issuance of a permit, if any
✓ Marked up plan review documents
✓ Two sets of approved building plans
✓ Backup documents and reports
✓ Documents provided in desired City format
Transmittal of Plans and Correction Lists
BV assumes responsibility for the pickup and return of
plans. All plans shall be picked up from the City offices within 24 hours of notification. Should the volume of
work be sufficient, we propose to establish regular pick up of plans on a consistent basis. We will also utilize shipping courier, at no additional cost to the City. Upon completion of each plan review, we will forward a copy
of the correction list to both the City and the applicant, by email. When corrected plans are resubmitted, the
previous procedure will be followed or the applicant
may schedule an office visit to go over any corrections in person. When plans are completed they are stamped,
signed and forwarded by BV personnel. Our transmittal
forms will be customized for the City of Torrance.
Plan Review Turnaround Times
BV provides plan review activities on a fast-track basis to reduce the impact on project contraction schedules.
Turnaround times for each submittal relate to the size
and nature of the submittal and impact on the project
construction schedule. To reduce turn around times for
plan check, the firm uses electronic submittals, phased submittals, conference calling, video-conferencing, and visits by plan check staff to design offices of the engineer or architect.
Electronic Plan Review Services
BV will continue to work with the City’s existing system but offers alternatives should the City be interested in learning about more options. Digital plan check uses a
software which presents customers with a convenient
alternative solution to printing and delivering paper
plans to City offices at zero cost. This modern solution has become especially valuable as municipalities seek
to continue service delivery to their communities while focusing on health and safety.
BV accepts utilizing the City’s software to enter and track plan checks and permit information upon examination of
this system.
BV provides an alternative solution to traditional plan checking. With GoPost, BlueBeam, Adobe Acrobat, or
other similar software, our plan reviewers can quickly and accurately review plans for compliance with applicable
codes. Plans are submitted as PDF files via a secure and confidential FTP site. These plans are then reviewed
by our personnel who are able to place comments and
redlines directly on the plans, corresponding to areas
needing revisions.
Redlined plans with comments are then forwarded to, or
placed on the secure FTP site for the designers, engineers, and architects. The City also has access to the FTP site.
Plans can then be revised and resubmitted via the same
method described. If all items were resolved, hard copy plans are sent to BV for approval stamps and signatures.
Clients who have a plan review going through the online process are able to see where their plans are in the
review process, ask questions, receive comments, submit updates, and more. Bluebeam GoPost accepts multiple
file types, from AutoCAD to PDFs, Word, and more.
Digital plan check has numerous advantages including,
but not limited to, the following:
▪ Eliminate the need to physically print and carry
plans to the City - Upload plans anytime from
anywhere.
▪ Know project status at all times - Check where
plans are and find out when reviews are
completed.
▪ Use the GoPost online portal to communicate
with the review team - Ask and answer questions;
make changes.
69 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
18 Vendor’s Response – Section III
▪ Reduce printing and courier costs - Checklist and
plan markup downloads make it easy to perform
corrections and resubmit documents online.
Electronic plan submittal and commenting allows for
economical movement of plans and quick turnaround
times. Plans with comments can be viewed and discussed
as needed to resolve issues quickly and efficiently.
BV has successfully implemented and utilized digital plan review in over 60 federal, state, and local agencies for multiple years.
Building Inspection
BV inspectors are ICC certified and have extensive
experience in the construction trades as well. Fast-
track projects may be built into small phases based on
incremental design and fabrication steps. In such cases, the firm’s inspection team keeps daily logs to track
corrections and plan review changes.
BV’s inspection team also has the capacity to provide
on-call building inspection services to cover personnel vacation time, peak work loads, specialized inspection
activities, and any other situations which may arise.
These activities may include next-day inspections and
same-day response to important or urgent requests. BV’s building inspection services can be adjusted to provide a high level of coordination specifically suited to the design- build concept.
BV is able to provide the City with ICC certified personnel to provide the following services:
▪ Read and study project specifications, plans, and
drawings to become familiar with project prior to
inspection, ensuring structural or architectural
changes have been stamped as approved by
appropriate authority and recognizing the need
for and requiring plan checks for electrical,
plumbing, and mechanical code requirements.
▪ Perform and document inspections on
construction projects to determine all aspects
of the project such as foundations, building,
electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems
conform to the applicable building codes, zoning
ordinances, energy conservation, and disabled
access requirements including known local, city,
state, and federal requirements.
▪ Review plans for building construction, plumbing,
electrical, and mechanical details prior to making
inspection.
▪ Bring to the attention of the City for approval
of certain changes in building, plumbing,
mechanical, electrical, and related work
consistent with code and ordinance
requirements.
▪ Participate in reviews with fire, health, and other
government agency inspectors & owners.
▪ Maintain a record of non-complying items and
follow up to resolution of such items.
▪ Upon request, the firm will inspect existing
buildings for substandard, unsafe conditions.
Virtual Inspections
BV is able to conduct virtual, no-contact field inspections in an effort to continue progress at as many active
jobsites as possible for both new and existing clients.
Using interactive technology, our building inspector will participate in a live session with the contractor to perform the inspection(s) remotely through the use of a mobile
device. Our goal is to allow construction to progress while maintaining a safe environment for all involved through social separation.
The firm strongly believes in the long term value of these digital platforms and in their potential to change how
inspection services are executed. The circumstances
faced by society will be a catalyst to help drive the
adoption of this new service, but once the ease of use and value creation is experienced first-hand BV believes it will become a standard component of inspection programs.
BV’s remote inspection services ensure the firm can
keep its employees and City staff safe by reducing direct contact, adhering to social distancing best practices and keep critical tasks moving forward with diminished need for in-person contact.
70 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
19 Vendor’s Response – Section III
CARE PROGRAM – A PROVEN, FORMALIZED & INTEGRATED PLAN REVIEW PROCESS BV employs innovative and creative approaches to delivering our services. The plan review process we follow for efficient completion of concurrent task management is shown in the flowchart below and managed through our CARE Program, a formalized and integrated process whereby Coordination, Analytical, Review, and Expert management/ quality control functions are consistently implemented on each and every project. We will implement a comprehensive program based on best practices to validate that each and every review is thorough, accurate, consistent, and timely.
This system’s success is based on thousands of hours of practical, real-world experience by our dedicated personnel and their unique ability to interact quickly and efficiently with your staff. The roles of each of our CARE elements include:
Coordinator:
Our clerical personnel will handle various administrative functions, such as logging information (project tracking, time budgeting), managing project controls, maintaining and distributing communications, reviewing agendas and ordinance issues, and fielding calls on project status. The Coordinator is the first line of contact for each project submittal.
Analyst:
Our analysts will review submittals, title sheets, and non-design items; maintain files; monitor due dates; monitor contract budget and status tracking reports; and coordinate invoicing. Our analysts also maximize and “right place” personnel resources to meet turnaround times in a quality manner. When assigning resubmittals to staff, our Analyst ensures consistency by passing the project to the same reviewer that performed the previous reviews. Reassignments are done when unforeseen circumstances dictate.
Reviewer:
Our experienced building plan reviewers will routinely review agency standards, ordinances, guidelines, and checklists; create comments letters; coordinate project return with the coordinator; attend review meetings; and communicate questions/solutions to project stakeholders. Because of our depth of resources and project tools (checklists, corrections letters, etc), reassigned projects can be reviewed without missing deadlines or causing unnecessary rechecks.
Expert:
BV experts will provide the final quality assurance review of applicable plans, studies, and reports in accordance with all accepted engineering, building codes of different disciplines, Subdivision Map Act, and industry professional practices.
They will comply with the applicable regulations; visit the client contact regularly; monitor project progress with the reviewer; disseminate project/agency information to the team; train team members; peer review comments letters; and communicate questions/solutions to stakeholders. Additionally, experts provide quality assurance reviews to each project which minimizes the number of resubmittals.
Bureau Veritas
Receives Plans &
Enters Information Into
Web-Enabled System &
Tracking Log
City of Torrance
Assigns Project
Submittal Intake
Checklist
Discuss Key Issues
with City
Quality Review
Prepare Corrections
Memo
City of Torrance
Permit Issuance
Enter Information Into
Plan Management
System
Permit Application
Submittal
Distribute Plans
to Appropriate
Plan Reviewers &
Agencies
C
A
R
E
Coordinator Analyst Reviewer Expert
Plumbing Plan
Review
Mechanical Plan
Review
Architectural Plan
Review
Structural Plan
Review
Electrical Plan
Review
Building Plan
Review
Fire & Safety
Services
PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
71 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
20 Vendor’s Response – Section III
PLAN REVIEW TURNAROUND TIMES
Turnaround times for each submittal will relate to the size and nature of the project and its impact on the construction schedule. The firm understands accuracy, efficiency, and integrity in all aspects of professional services are required.
BV’s team will maintain efficient turnaround times on all reviews as a key measurement of its performance for plan review services. We are able to produce plan review in a timely fashion and are able to present any necessary reports or studies to elected officials and/or the general public.
Providing plan review services to nearly 200 jurisdictions over the past 49 years, BV has a strong history of successfully meeting project deadlines. Upon request, BV is able to provide plan review activities on a fast-track basis. To reduce turnaround times for plan review, the firm can use electronic submittals, phased submittals, conference calling, and videoconferencing. Our team is committed to ensuring that all deadlines are met to meet the needs of our clients.
Typical Plan Review Turnaround Times
Service Initial Check (working days) Recheck
(working days)
Commercial TI 7 5*
Residential addition and/or accessory building 7 5*
New Residential 7 5
Multi-Residential and New Multi-Residential,
Commercial, and Industrial 10* 7*
Return of telephone calls and e-mails: Within 8 hours or one business day. *Large and/or Complex projects to be negotiated.
INSPECTION TURNAROUND TIMES
• Perform all inspections on the following day after receiving inspection requests • Weekend and emergency response type of inspections are available upon request BV’s inspection team is deployed with technology, including iPads and other similar technology, during field inspections. We work with a jurisdiction’s IT department to install required software programs.
DELIVERING TASKS AND DELIVERABLES
BV’s successful track record with more than 200 jurisdictions and longtime clients speaks to our ability to deliver project tasks and deliverables within the identified project budget and minimize cost overruns. We take pride in completing our projects on-time or ahead of schedule utilizing our proven project management system and our Accounting staff is committed to working with your team to ensure seamless billing procedures. 72 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
21 Vendor’s Response – Section III
COMMUNICATIONS APPROACH
BV has dedicated a strong and seasoned Project
Manager who will serve as your primary point-of-
contact. Joe Chao, P .E. has more than 12 years of
experience managing plan review projects, inspections
and code enforcement work in the building department.
Joe, along with our entire building and safety staff, will be dedicated to the City of Torrance’s needs.
Our team’s experience and ability to clearly communicate technical concepts and terminology with the community,
architects, engineers and applicants is fostered through collaboration. Our staff utilizes a series of proven
technologies to streamline service delivery, enhance
communication, and promote transparency. BV also has
its own comprehensive, web-based project management
system that delivers secure access 24/7 to project data, generates e-mail updates, and digitizes the entire plan review, map review, and inspection process. We also use electronic plan review, where reviews and comments
are accessible in real time via the web. These tools
encourage collaboration, enhance expedited requests,
save money and time, reduce waste and storage space,
build consensus, and promote project transparency.
Each team member of the technical team is selected
according to the depth and appropriateness of experience as they relate to the specific technical tasks called for by the project. To ensure that the work assignment is
being performed at the highest professional level, BV
relies on the management and technical excellence
of its personnel and a proven QA/QC program. This
assures the quality of all the work performed under this contract meets client approval. BV has developed and
implements corporate QA policies, consistent with all
applicable federal and state regulatory requirements and standards, covering all aspects of project performance, technical quality, and peer review. These policies are
implemented at each professional and technical level
to provide a well-balanced, independent QA program,
which assures the quality of reports, technical reviews, annuals and other documentation prepared by BV.
This ensures that the product is consistent with the
established standards from the standpoint of quality,
validity, and legal defensibility.
At BV, we all share the responsibility for continual
improvement of our quality management process and
believe that our program, supported by our BV business
model and our code of ethics, will ensure the continual delivery of high quality products and services to City. Like the City of Torrance, BV believes in community health
and wellness. We will establish BV as a City of Torrance preferred supplier in conformity assessment and
certification services in the fields of quality assurance, health and safety, environment, and social responsibility (QHSE). Our quality management system provides the
framework for continual improvement of our internal
management processes and resources which will in
turn add value for City through the services offered and delivered. In addition, our quality management system
gives the company and City the confidence that the
provision of services and products will be delivered
consistently to predetermined high standards.
Quality Assurance
BV associates all share the responsibility for continual improvement of the firm’s quality management process
and believe the program, supported by the BV business
model and its code of ethics, will ensure the continual delivery of high quality products and services to the City of Torrance. In doing so, the firm will establish itself as the City’s preferred supplier in conformity assessment and
certification services in the fields of quality assurance, health and safety, environment, and social responsibility (QHSE).
BV’s quality management system provides the framework
for continual improvement of its internal management
processes and resources which will in turn add value
for the City through the services offered and delivered.
In addition, Our quality management system gives the
company and the City the confidence that the provision
of services and products will be delivered consistently to predetermined high standards worldwide.
Budget Controls and Billing Related
Quality Assurance - FLEX
Budget control is achieved by closely
monitoring work assignment labor and
direct expenses. Work reports must
be completed by each individual and the labor hours
must be approved by the project manager before being
charged to the City of Torrance. Similarly, expense reports and other direct expenses must be approved by the
project manager prior to entering the cost data system.
To ensure optimal administration of the main
functionalities of contract management and the
facilitation of billing related quality assurance BV utilizes FLEX. FLEX is a reference repository which is comprised of all billing and contractual information (invoices, work 73 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
22 Vendor’s Response – Section III
assignments, expenses, labor reports, project reports,
etc.). This advanced system assists BV in implementing
and maintaining a number of budget and cost control
processes which:
▪ Ensures data integrity and allows for a flexible
and secure billing process
▪ Enhances billing efficiency and productivity
▪ Minimizes revenue leakage by monitoring its
sources through control reports
FLEX ensures contract and budget control via standardized features and alignment of project information in real time.
Additionally, the system is designed to promote contract follow up from project outset to closing which helps to establish and maintain optimal communication.
Project Management and Schedule Controls -
Quickbase Protrack
Work assignment schedules will be managed on several
levels. The project manager will maintain regular contact with the City manager to communicate the project status and progress on deliverables. In addition, an internal
schedule including critical milestones and deliverable due dates will be established prior to initiating the task work.
This allows ample time for editorial and technical review, changes, and assurance in schedule compliance.
In order to efficiently and effectively track project
workflow BV employs Protrack, a quality assurance
software solution created by Quickbase. This custom-
built program was developed specifically to meet the
needs of the firm and enhance its project management
capabilities in service to its clients. Protrack monitors numerous pieces of project data in real time including, but not limited to, project schedule status, active projects by office, project type, number of active projects per
client, weekly number of new projects initiated, and
much more. The program’s dashboard allows users to
generate reports which can provide an overall snapshot
of BV’s current activities or can be filtered to present precise details regarding a specific project or client. The crucial information monitored in Protrack not only aids in maintaining schedules and project turnaround times
but also gives the firm the capacity to make decisive
course corrections which ensure deliverables of the
highest caliber and complete customer satisfaction.
Furthermore, Protrack is designed to work collaboratively with BV’s billing and invoicing software, FLEX, to enable the consistent completion of projects on-time and on-
budget.
74 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
23 Vendor’s Response – Section III
14 Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
References:
Please supply the names of companies/agencies for which you recently supplied comparable goods/services as requested in this RFP. A minimum of three (3) references is required; additional references are optional. References from public agencies are preferred. Do not include the City of Torrance as a reference for this RFP.
1 Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City:
State, Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
2 Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City, State Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
3 Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City, State Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
County of Los Angeles
900 S. Fremont Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803
Building Plan Check and Inspection
Juan Madrigal, Building Official
626.458.6385
[email protected]
City of Redondo Beach
415 Diamond Street
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
Building Plan Check and Inspection
Lorena Soules, CBO, CASp, Building Official
310.318.0636
[email protected]
City of Monrovia
415 S. Ivy Avenue
Monrovia, CA 91016
Building Plan Check, Permitting, and Inspection
Greg Boyajian, Building & Safety Manager
626.932.5532
[email protected]
75 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
24 Vendor’s Response – Section III
15 Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
RFP Submittal Requirement and Acknowledgement
Vendors are required to answer each of the questions listed below. You must indicate below that you have provided this information in your proposal submittal. You must attach additional sheets to your RFP submittal describing in detail the service you are proposing.
RFP Scope of Work Questions
Indicate what page in your
proposal you have
answered this question.
Did you include a signed Affidavit Form with your RFP Submittal?
Yes No
Did you include proof of a valid State of California Civil, Structural, Geotechnical Engineering License.
Did you include proof of a valid Certified Access Specialist (CASp) certification from California Division of State Architect.
Did you include proof of relevance certifications to perform plan review and inspection?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Did you attach additional sheets to answer the Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects information within this RFP?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you complete a project proposal as described in the Technical Requirements?
Yes No
Did you review all addenda, if any, issued by the City?
Yes No
Did you include resumes of no more than three (3) qualified candidates?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you include References?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal
Are your Wage Rates (Non-Prevailing) Included?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Have you included Proposed Alternative Language to City’s Pro Forma Consulting Services Agreement (if applicable)
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
7 28
9 26
76 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
25 Vendor’s Response – Section III
16 Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
RFP Submittal Requirement and Acknowledgement Continued Vendors are required to answer each of the questions listed below. You must indicate below that you have provided this information in your proposal submittal. You must attach additional sheets to your RFP submittal describing in detail the service you are proposing.
RFP Scope of Work Questions
Indicate what page in your
proposal you have answered
this question.
Did you indicate your price to provide the plans review services as indicated in this RFP?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you describe your experience with plan check review? Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
26 7
77 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
26 Vendor’s Response – Section III
17 Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________
Price Proposal Cost Breakdown To Provide the Services Required in this RFP Description No. of Hours Labor Cost/hr ($) Cost
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Total Price Proposal $
Price Proposal
In accordance with your "Request for Proposal", the following price proposal is submitted to the City of Torrance. We understand that our price submittal is a not to exceed amount and that if we are selected to enter into negotiations with the City the pricing may be adjusted down unless additional services are requested and pricing will be negotiated and adjusted accordingly.
Category Description
(Vendor must attached a full description for each
category explaining what they are proposing) All services must be itemized. Do not bundle.
Proposal Not to Exceed
Amount by Category Description
Building Plan Check** $
Total Amount for Project $
** This review include energy, green building, accessibility, references and all applicable codes and statues.
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
Structural Engineer / Fire Protection Engineer 145
Plan Review Engineer / Sr. Plans Examiner 135 ($145 On-Site) Plans Examiner 120 ($130 On-Site)
Fire Plans Examiner 135
TBD
TBD
TBD
Please find the fee table on the following page for each category and price. 78 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
27 Vendor’s Response – Section III
FEE PROPOSAL
Bureau Veritas’ pricing reflects our commitment to the success of the City by helping you maintain significant quality and cost saving benefits moving forward. These Include:
• Highly qualified staff familiar with the City’s needs • Reduced plan review turnaround times
• Commitment to maintain a proposed rate structure for the life of the initial contract period • Confidence of working with a well-established consultant in operation for 196+ year
HOURLY RATES FOR SERVICES
PLAN CHECK PERCENTAGE
55% - Plan Check (Base Fee):
SERVICES HOURLY BILLING RATES
Structural Engineer / Fire Protection Engineer $145
Plan Review Engineer / Sr. Plans Examiner $135 ($145 on-site) Plans Examiner $120 ($130 on-site)
Fire Plans Examiner $135
CASp Plan Review $140
Sr. Building Inspector $120
Building Inspector $110
Permit Technician $85
Administrative / Clerical $65
GEOLOGIST AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Principal Geotechnical Engineer $275
Geotechnical Plan Review Engineer $185
• Overtime will be charged at 1.5X standard hourly rates. No overtime will be charged without prior authorization by the client
• Rates and cost estimates shown above exclude per diem, prevailing wage and union rates. Should these be applicable, BV will discuss and negotiate fees to account for increased personnel costs • Mileage to be invoiced at established IRS limits
• Expedited Plan Review services can be performed upon request at 1.5X standard rate 79 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
28 Vendor’s Response – Section III
18 RFP Document Revised September, 2019
ATTACHMENT 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROPOSER’S AFFIDAVIT
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
____________________________ being first duly sworn deposes and says:
1. That he/she is the ___________________________ of _____________________________ (Title of Office) (Name of Company)
Hereinafter called “proposer”, who has submitted to the City of Torrance a proposal for
__________________________________________________________________________ (Title of RFP)
2. That the proposal is genuine; that all statements of fact in the proposal are true;
3. That the proposal was not made in the interest or behalf of any person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation not named or disclosed;
4. That the Proposer did not, directly or indirectly, induce solicit or agree with anyone else to submit a false or sham proposal, to refrain from proposing, or to withdraw his proposal, to raise or fix the proposal price of the Proposer or of anyone else, or to raise or fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the Proposer’s price or the price of anyone else; and did not attempt to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of Torrance, or of any other Proposer, or anyone else interested in the proposed contract;
5. That the Proposer has not in any other manner sought by collusion to secure for itself an advantage over the other Proposer or to induce action prejudicial to the interests of the City of Torrance, or of any other Proposer or of anyone else interested in the proposed contract;
6. That the Proposer has not accepted any proposal from any subcontractor or materialman through any proposal depository, the bylaws, rules or regulations of which prohibit or prevent the Proposer from considering any proposal from any subcontractor or material man, which is not processed through that proposal depository, or which prevent any subcontractor or materialman from proposing to any contractor who does not use the facilities of or accept proposals from or through such proposal depository;
7. That the Proposer did not, directly or indirectly, submit the Proposer’s proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or to any individual or group of individuals, except to the City of Torrance, or to any person or persons who have a partnership or other financial interest with said Proposer in its business.
8. That the Proposer has not been debarred from participation in any State or Federal works project.
Dated this ____ day of ________________, 20_____.
_____________________________________
(Proposer Signature)
_____________________________________
(Title)
Craig Baptista, M.B.A.
Vice President, West - Plan Check & Inspection Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
RFP No. B2024-15 - RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis 13 December 24
VP , West - Plan Check & Inspection
80 STAFF QUALIFICATIONS
81 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
30 Staff Qualifications
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
The following organizational chart consists of BV’s proposed team for the City of Torrance. BV has a robust in-house team of professionals to fulfill all the requested services for the City. Joe Chao, P .E., Regional Manager/Project Manager will serve as your day-to-day contacts. Resumes of the management team members highlighted in blue below can be found in the following pages. BV takes pride in our team’s ability to work collaboratively with other members of a multi-disciplinary team in a complex and dynamic working environment.
LEADERSHIP TEAM
Craig Baptista, M.B.A.
Vice President, Facilities - West
Region / Contract Liaison
Joe Chao, P .E.
Regional Manager/Project Manager
PROJECT TEAM
Plan Review Engineers
Henry Hadidi, Ph.D., S.E.
Joe Chao, P .E.
Matthew Godinez, P .E.
Robert Chang, P .E., C.B.O.
Moe Heivand, P .E.
Syed Aleem, P .E.
Abteen Shirehjini, P .E., CASp
Sunai Kim, Ph.D., S.E.
Tom Harris, S.E.
Henry Pio, P .E., LEED AP (Electrical)
Cristian Son, P .E. (Electrical)
Richard Henrickson, P .E.
(Plumbing)
Plans Examiners
Joe Medina, E.I. T .
Martin Pasamba
Jecsan Perez, E.I. T .
Glenn Kechejian, E.I. T .
Matthew Torosian, P .E.
Golnaz Bastani
Lana Kazma, EIT
Dwayne Butz
CASp
Jason Pasuit, C.B.O., C.A.Sp.
Abteen Shirehjini, P .E., CASp
Salvador Gonzalez, C.A.Sp.
Inspectors
Louie Vaith
Kirk Zimmerman
Dwayne Butz
Todd Morris
Francisco Villalva
Andres Kortright
Luis Mota
Reginald Ramirez
82 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
31 Staff Qualifications
Craig Baptista
Vice President, Facilities - West Region / Contract Liaison Prior to joining Bureau Veritas, Craig served as Director of Operations and is a business professional experienced in leading multiple branch offices in various states. Craig has over 21 years of experience in the construction industry. He is results-oriented and has exceptional experience building and managing successful programs and relationships. He is a skilled communicator capable of articulating complex ideas in a concise and persuasive manner. Craig has proven experience as a facilitator of solutions for client problems and is a strategic thinker with the ability to translate vision into tactics. He is self-motivated, passionate and resourceful.
Craig has expertise identifying client needs and is able to execute problems quickly by utilizing his professional business management skills. He is equally effective working independently or collaborating with others.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Craig has managed various projects as Director of Operations and successfully reduced operating expenses by 18% through implementation of a preventative maintenance program and establishment of a baseline repair cost matrix. He provided leadership, mentoring, direction and training for a 35 member Operations team that included Branch Managers, Project Managers, and other staff. He developed annual business plans, market strategies, operations and sales goals which resulted in year over year growth. Craig has worked on various significant projects, including, but not limited to:
• Apple Campus II in Cupertino, CA
• Cal Trans - Bay Bridge Project in Oakland, CA
• Tesla Gigafactory in Sparks, NV
• Souza Construction - Lemoore Naval Air Station Project in Fresno, CA • Advance Range Solution - Fort Hunter Liggett in Jolon, CA • Hensel Phelps - Mule Creek Prison in Ione, CA
Vice President, Facilities - West Region
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2015 - Present
Serves as Vice President for the West Coast code compliance division. Manages over 50 employees throughout California, Arizona, Nevada, Washington, and Utah. Oversees plan review and inspection activities to ensure BVNA has ample resources to meet turnaround times and provide quick response to inspection requests. Works directly with plan review team to gain efficiencies in turnaround times. Effectively reduced the number of reviews by promoting direct contact with designers and municipalities to remedy code deficiencies during the first and second reviews, allowing our team to approve projects during the second submittal phase.
EDUCATION
M.B.A.
B.S., Business Management
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
Six Sigma Green Belt Certified
OSHA 30
United States Navy: Honorable
Discharge
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
21+
83 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
32 Staff Qualifications
EDUCATION
M.S., Structural Engineering
B.S., Civil Engineering
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
Registered Professional Engineer:
CA, #85679
DC, #PE922133
MD: 0056984
ICC Certified:
Building Plans Examiner
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Structural Engineers Association
of Southern California (SEAOSC)
- SEAOSC Convention Young
Members Committee 2014 & 2018
California Building
Officials (CALBO)
International Code Council
Ventura Region Chapter (ICCVRC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
12+
Joe Chao, P .E.
Plan Check Engineer
Joe has more than 12 years of experience in engineering. He reviews plans for various counties and cities, consisting of small additions/remodels, to moderate and complex residential and commercial projects, including site, architectural, structural plans/calculations, Fire and Life Safety and Photovoltaic installations; checking for completeness, accuracy, and Code compliance with State and Local building codes.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Regional Manager, Westlake Village Office / Atascadero Office Bureau Veritas
2019 - Present
Manages day to day operations of the Bureau Veritas Westlake office. On a daily basis works closely with clients to meet their needs and provide quality services efficiently. Responsibilities include building official duties, special project management, managing contracts of permits, plan check, and inspection services for 10 jurisdictions.
Senior Plan Check Engineer
California Code Check, a Bureau Veritas Company
2011 - Present
Manages plan check operations and training support at Westlake Village office. Review residential and commercial plans and calculations for compliance with the California Building Codes, including mechanical, plumbing, electrical, energy, and green building codes. Assist plan check engineers and perform quality assurance reviews of plan checks. Review jurisdiction ordinances and create standard comment lists for the specific requirements/needs of each jurisdiction. Train and develop/mentor interns for Westlake Village and Atascadero office.
Plan Review
County of Monterey New Juvenile Hall Facility, $57 Million in Total 2017 - Present
Plan review for construction of a new juvenile hall to replace the existing facility.
Plan Review
County of San Luis Obispo Juvenile Hall Expansion, $21.3 Million in Total 2014 - 2017
Plan review for expansion of the existing SLO juvenile hall facility.
Plan Review
Del Amo Mall, $250 Million in Total
2013 - 2015
Plan review for a large shopping center renovation, including relocation of Nordstrom, consolidation of Macy’s stores, and new 2-story fashion wing. 84 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
33 Staff Qualifications
Hassan (Henry) Hadidi, Ph.D., S.E.
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Henry is a results-oriented structural engineer with 34+ years of experience in plan review and design. He has extensive knowledge of current building codes including IBC, IRC, ACI 318, ACI 530, AISC 341, AISC 358, AISC 360, AISI, ASCE 31-03, ASCE 41-13, ASCE 5, ASCE 7, and NDS. He has strong verbal and written communication skills in meetings and communicating with clients to answer questions regarding the generated plan review comments. He is a self-starter with a strong ability to lead or work within a team and has demonstrated organizational and problem-solving skills. Recent experience includes several pedestrian walk bridges for the University of California, Los Angeles and also for the City of Roseville.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Senior Structural Engineer
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2017 - Present
Plan review of residential and commercial projects of all sizes and complexities throughout California.
Plan Review
JW Marriott Hotel
2015 - Present
Plan review for a new 12-story, four-diamond luxury hotel with two levels of subterranean parking. The hotel will have 466 guest rooms as well as meeting space for groups.
Structural Plan Review
Cahuilla Casino & Hotel Project
2018 - Present
Plan review for the Cahuilla Band of Indians new casino and hotel property which will replace the original casino facility. The project is 14,920 SF, mixed occupancy, A2 and B, construction type II-B, including a 31,997 SF hotel and 34,121 SF casino.
Additional Experience
• Senior Structural Engineer - Private Sector (Irvine, California) (2015 - 2017) • Senior Project Engineer - Private Sector (Orange, California) (2014 - 2015) • Senior Structural Engineer - Private Sector (Pittsburg, Pennsylvania) (2013 - 2015) • Senior Project Engineer - Private Sector (Orange, California) (2011 - 2012) • Senior Structural Engineer - Private Sector (Irvine, California) (2004 - 2011) • Consultant - Private Sector (San Clemente, California) (2002 - 2003) • Senior Engineer - Private Sector (Irvine, California) (2001 - 2002) • Consultant - Private Sector (San Clemente, California) (1999 - 2001) • Senior Structural Engineer - Private Sector (Los Angeles, California) (1998 - 1999) • Principal Structural Engineer - Private Sector (Irvine, California) (1991 - 1998) • Senior Structural Engineer - Private Sector (Mission Viejo, California) (1988 - 1991) • Senior Structural Engineer -Private Sector (Mountain View, California) (1986 - 1988)
EDUCATION
Ph.D. Structural Engineering
M.S., Structural Engineering
B.S., Civil Engineering
REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS
Registered Professional Engineer: CA,
#S4078
CA, #C49136
ICC Certified: Building Plans Examiner
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
34+
85 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
34 Staff Qualifications
Matthew Godinez, P .E.
Plan Review Engineer
Matthew has more than 12 years of experience, two as a building plans examiner. He previously worked with engineering firms as a Surveying and Engineer Assistant.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Building Plans Examiner/Building Inspector
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2016 - Present
Responsible for plan review and commentary on a variety of plans including residential, commercial, additions, alterations, tenant improvements, and new construction. Performs building inspection to ensure compliance with state and local building codes, zoning regulations, mechanical, electrical and plumbing codes.
Mixed Use High Rise - Washington D.C.
• 14 story, 470,000 square feet
• 3 stories of parking, 2 stories of business and mercantile, 9 stories of multi-family residential, rooftop pool/cabanas/recreation (S, M, B, R, A)
Post tensioned slab, concrete core, steel frame, w/ cold formed steel Distribution Center - Oxnard
• 4 story, 3 million square feet
• F-1 and S-1 storage and processing
• Tilt-up concrete walls and panelized diaphragm with special concrete shear walls and steel moment frame interior stories
Tilt-up Warehouse - Oxnard
• 1 story (w/ 2 story offices), 1.2 million square feet • F-1, S-1, B warehouse and offices
• Concrete shear walls and panelized diaphragm with special truss frame Multi-family Residential - Los Angeles Co
• 4 story
• 48 unit multi-family residential over parking
• 3 stories of wood construction over concrete podium
Cultivo Mixed Use - Desert Hot Springs
• 2 story
• Marijuana cultivation, training facility, and restaurant • Steel frame building
EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
Licensed Professional Engineer:
CA, #91519
ICC Certified:
Building Plans Examiner
Commercial Building Inspector
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Board Member of CalGeo
Professional Society
International Code Council (ICC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
12+
86 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
35 Staff Qualifications
Robert Chang, P .E., C.B.O.
Plan Review Engineer
Robert has decades of experience as a registered engineer, certified plans examiner and building official. His broad range of responsibilities have included reviewing plan checks, coordinating projects between departments, preparing annual budgets, and resolving construction issues. Robert previously served as President of the Orange Empire Chapter of I.C.B.O.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Building Official / Senior Plan Check Engineer / Geotechnical Reviewer Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2017 - present
Plans, directs, and coordinates the activities between the Engineering, Planning and Building departments. Robert performed plan checks for hundreds of residential, multi-residential, and commercial projects to meet the requirements of building and fire codes. He also sets up systems, policies, and procedures. Robert oversees and reviews daily construction issues and prepares annual budget estimate including capital projects. Capital projects include seismic retrofit and new public and school buildings. He also supervises City and contract employees.
Chief Building Official
City of Placentia
1985 - 2017
Plans, directs, and coordinates the activities between the Engineering, Planning and Building departments. Robert performed plan checks for hundreds of residential, multi-residential, and commercial projects to meet the requirements of building and fire codes. He also sets up systems, policies, and procedures. Robert oversees and reviews daily construction issues and prepares annual budget estimate including capital projects. Capital projects include seismic retrofit and new public and school buildings. He also supervises City and contract employees.
Plan Check Engineer
City of Ontario
1984 - 1985
Worked as a plan check division supervisor, responsible for all residential, commercial, and industrial building projects to comply with different state, local and other code requirements. Supervise and coordinate capital projects such as building repairs and renovations, these projects are: fire stations, library and city hall expansions.
Project Engineer
Central Consulting Engineering Services
1982 - 1984
Worked as a project engineer for residential, commercial and industrial buildings.
Robert’s main responsibilities were design grading and building plans, site-surveying, drainage and soil analysis, specifications’ writing, on-site inspections, resolving daily construction problems, design and drafting group supervision, project computer programs writing, structural design and calculation analysis for different building design projects.
EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering
REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer
License: #32884, CA
Certified Plans Examiner:
I.C.B.O., #15237:
Certified Building Official:
C.A.B.O., #3029
American Society of Civil
Engineer:A.S.C.E., #244676
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Orange Empire Chapter of
I.C.B.O. - Past President
American Society of Civil Engineer
Certified Building Official
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
40+
87 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
36 Staff Qualifications
Matthew Torosian, P .E.
Plan Review Engineer
Matthew has more than three years of experience as a building plans examiner providing plan review services on residential and commercial projects of various sizes and complexities, and is an Engineer-in-Training. He is a team player committed to the success of our clients, working diligently to provide quality plan checking strategies that result in reduced costs for applicants.
Matthew possesses excellent communication skills and is fluent in both English and Armenian.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Plan Review Engineer
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2021 - Present
Reviews residential and commercial projects for multiple jurisdictions, including photovoltaic, multi-dwelling structures and single-family dwelling units. Matthew collaborates with design professionals to accurately enforce code compliance on plans to ensure safety, quality of life, and sustainability, successfully complete 90% of all plan checks before the deadline. He is skilled in Bluebeam and Microsoft Office and has proficiency in the following codes:
EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering
B.S. Civil Engineering
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
Licensed Professional Engineer:
CA, # 96543
ICC Certified:
Building Plans Examiner
Commercial Energy Plans
Examiner
CAL OES SAP
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
SEAOSC
CALBO
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
3+
• CBC
• CRC
• CEnC
• CPC
• CEC
• CMC
• CGBSC
• ASCE 7
• AISC 15
• ACI 318
• NDS Wood Construction
88 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
37 Staff Qualifications
Joe Medina, M.S., E.I. T .
Plans Examiner
Joe is a plans examiner with strong technical capabilities and leadership skills helping to ensure that review of plans and specifications for the construction, alteration and repair of commercial, residential, and industrial buildings and structures meet the requirements of applicable building, mechanical, plumbing, fire, and electrical codes for clients. Joe has a profound knowledge of methods, materials and practices of construction. He is an upcoming graduate with a Master’s Degree in Structural Engineering. He is also an International Code Council Certified Building Plans Examiner. He has the necessary knowledge, skills and ability to read and interpret site plans, building plans, specifications, calculations and codes to determine compliance with appropriate codes and ordinances, analyze difficult construction code situations and to comprehensively examine plans and specifications and discuss. He possesses strong judgment, is able to communicate clearly both orally and in writing and excellent human relations skills.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Plans Examiner
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2018 - Present
Performs a variety of advanced technical, administrative, and supervisory work in directing engineering activities related to plan review for numerous municipal clients throughout the Southern California. Reviews residential, commercial, industrial and public works project plans, reports and other development and design related documents for compliance with all applicable building, mechanical, plumbing, fire, and electrical codes, and other local, state, and federal codes and guidelines. Interacts with designers, contractors and owners to review proposed projects, answered question. Provides interpretations of the codes and established policies and procedures. Researches code and product standards to determine compliance with adopted codes. Select clients include:
• City of Malibu
• County of Los Angeles
• City of Glendale
• City of Torrance (on-site)
Internship
City of Los Angeles, CA
2017
Internship with City of Los Angeles involved participating on several fabrication projects at the C.
Erwin Piper Technical Center for the Los Angeles City Department. Was in charge of fabrication and proper manufacturing of radio room for signal testing.
EDUCATION
M.S. Structural Engineer
B.S. Civil Engineer
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Engineer in Training,
CA #EIT-172115
ICC Certified #9264369:
Building Plans Examiner
Cal OES Safety Assessment
Program, Building Inspector
#91913
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
Structural Engineers Association
of Southern California (SEAOSC)
International Code Council (ICC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
6+
89 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
38 Staff Qualifications
Martin Pasamba
Plans Examiner
Martin has 7+ years of experience as a civil engineer. His experience in plan review comes from reviewing custom homes and mixed-use residential and new commercial buildings.
Some notable projects include a 282-unit apartment complex, a 100,000+ sq. ft. warehouse, and a new gas station, canopy, convenience store, and propane storage. His strengths in plan review center around fire/life safety, accessibility, and structural disciplines. He has software experience in Microsoft Office, Excel, Risa-2D, Bluebeam, and AutoCAD.
Select Project Experience
Plans Examiner
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2019 - Present
Conducts various residential and commercial plan review of structures using the latest applicable California Residential, Building, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Energy or International Building code. Performs structural, geotechnical, grading, and building code analysis to review/ discern possible risks. Represents Bureau Veritas when communicating with architects, structural engineers and/ or building officials to discuss fire/ life safety inquiries to ensure planned safety and constructability. Complies with jurisdiction ordinance requirements for Redondo Beach, LA County, San Bernardino, San Dimas, Monrovia, Santa Rosa, and Malibu for plan submittals. Coordinated projects for Santa Rosa Tubbs Fire project rebuild. Coordinates plan review with plan check engineers and/ or City agencies. Participate in SEAOC, CALBO and CASp training seminars for continuation credit.
Plan Review Engineer
Los Angeles County Public Works
2021-2022
Performs complex plan review work during the design, construction, inspection, and coordination of a variety of public works projects. Processes, reviews, and assists in the approval of plans associated with residential, commercial, industrial development, subdivision, and other projects for conformance. Provides assistance to jurisdictional staff and general public on requirements for applying for permits and the related fees. Works with architects, engineers, designers, builders, property owners, and stakeholders to obtain compliance, making recommendations for resolution.
EDUCATION
M.S., Structural Engineering
B.S., Civil Engineering
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
ICC Certified:
Building Plans Examiner
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
7+
90 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
39 Staff Qualifications
Jecsan Perez
Building Plans Examiner / Senior Building Inspector
Jecsan has more than 5 years of experience providing plan check and inspection services for residential and commercial projects of various sizes and complexities. He has strong interpersonal skills and takes a proactive approach to problem solving, interfacing with owners, architects and contractors. Jecsan is bilingual in English and Spanish.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Building Plans Examiner / Senior Building Inspector
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2021 - Present
Reviews non-engineering construction plans for residential, commercial, and industrial buildings and structures to ensure compliance with the applicable municipal, state, and federal codes and ordinances including the California Building Codes (including photovoltaic). Provides assistance to jurisdictional staff and general public on requirements for applying for construction or alteration permits and the related fees. Works with architects, engineers, designers, builders, property owners, and stakeholders to obtain compliance, making recommendations for resolution.
Conducts inspections to ensure building construction is in compliance with the applicable municipal, state, and federal codes and ordinances. Reads and studies project specifications, plans, and drawings to become familiar with the project prior to inspection, confirming structural or architectural changes have been stamped as approved by the relevant authority. Documents inspections on construction projects to determine all aspects of the project such as foundations, building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems conform to the applicable building codes, zoning ordinances, energy conservation, and disabled access requirements.
M6 Consulting, Inc.
Plans Examiner
2019 - 2020
Examined plans for residential and commercial projects for the City of Calabasas. Utlized AutoCAD to draft architectural and structural details for residential design projects.
EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineer
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
ICC Certified:
Commercial Building Inspector
Engineer-in-Training
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
National Council of Examiners for
Engineering and Surveying
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
5+
91 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
40 Staff Qualifications
Dwayne Butz
Plans Examiner / Building Inspector
Dwayne has 25+ years of design and inspection experience in the building industry.
He has been responsible for multiple inspections, code updates, and designing for residential and commercial projects. He has managed training of colleagues and as a result is exceptionally knowledgeable in the building codes, municipal codes and building department operations. Dwayne is able to successfully communicate with customers and explain building code sections thoroughly.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Plans Examiner/Building Inspector
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2021 - Present
Perform plan reviews for residences and commercial buildings. Highly knowledgeable on building codes and regulations. Works effectively with applicants to explain code requirements. Creates corrections, outlining areas of improvement for plans and referencing the applicable building code sections and locally adopted regulations.
Associate
Marx/Okubo Associates
2020 – 2021
ICC Certified Inspector responsible for hundreds of residential renovation inspections within a military housing development consisting of 3 (three) different communities.
Created system to provide a quick snapshot of project inspection status.
Designer
KB Home
2016 – 2020
Created hundreds of hand sketched Design Drawings for KB Home Arizona. California, Colorado. Florida, Nevada, North Carolina, Texas and/a Washington Divisions Pro- Actively addressed Design Guideline, Marketing, Purchasing, and Construction opportunities and constraints. Responsible fa New Plan Series within KB Home Texas Divisions. Completed over200 KB University online courses. Assisted with the creation of Colorado Division’s popular Mid-Century Modem Star1ig,t Collection Project Manager
CJ Light Associates
2014 to 2016
Provided several clients with he personalized care needed to effectively translate their custom home wishes into reality within the Coastal Cities of Seal Beach, Newport Beach, Laguna Beach and Dana Point California. Identified and addressed possible conflicts prior to construction. lncreased Junior Project Managers knowledge of construction and building code through one on one discussion. Reduced overall costs without sacrificing design intent.
EDUCATION
B.A., Architecture
B.F.A., Interior Planning/Design
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
NAHB Certificate
IRM Certificate
ICC Certifications:
Residential Plans Examiner
Residential Combination
Inspector
Residential Building Inspector
Mechanical Inspector
Residential Electrical Inspector
Residential Plumbing Inspector
Lean Six Sigma Black Belt
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
Institute of Risk Management
(IRM)
National Green Building
Standard Certification (NAHB)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
25+
92 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
41 Staff Qualifications
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
ICC Certified Building
Plans Examiner
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
5+
Golnaz Bastani
Building Plans Examiner
Golnaz is a highly motivated, result-oriented plan examiner specializing in residential projects.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Building Plans Examiner
Bureau Veritas - Westlake Village Location
2019 - Present
Reviews architectural drawings and engineering specifications for completeness, accuracy, and compliance with building, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, energy conservation, and disabled access codes and local building regulations. Performs complex engineering calculations and analyses to check engineering calculations provided by applicants. Suggests plan changes to applicants in order to bring drawings and specifications into compliance with state and local building codes and ordinances.
93 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
42 Staff Qualifications
Lana Kazma, E.I. T .
Building Plans Examiner
Lana is a highly motivated, result-oriented plan examiner specializing in both commercial and residential projects. Her experience includes checking for compliance with federal, state, and local codes, reviewing construction plans, and outlining deficiencies. Highly skilled and knowledgeable, Lana is valued member to any professional team.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Building Plans Examiner
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2019 - Present
Perform plan reviews for residences and commercial buildings. Highly knowledgeable on building codes and regulations. Works effectively with applicants to explain code requirements. Creates corrections, outlining areas of improvement for plans and referencing the applicable building code sections and locally adopted regulations.
Projects include:
• Residential: 1 story, 2 story ( timber, concrete )
• Master plans
• Revisions, remodel
• Up to 3-story
• Triplex
• Motel revision, Palm Springs
• Temporary structures
• Commercial TI’s including restaurant , stores, warehouses, apartment complex (FLS) • Pools
• 2-3 buildings for water park in Palm Springs
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering
M.S., Structural Engineering
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
Engineer-in-Training (E.I.T.)
ICC Certified:
Building Plans Examiner
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
5+
94 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
43 Staff Qualifications
Louie Vaith
Residential Building Inspector
Louie has 20+ years of experience in the construction industry, including 10 years of blueprint reading. He has strong customer service experience. He conducts inspections to ensure building construction is compliant with applicable municipal, state, and federal codes. He determines all aspects of the project such as foundations, building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems conform to the applicable building codes.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Building Inspector
County of Riverside - Bureau Veritas
2019 - Current
Responsibilities include blueprint reading, field plan check, residential inspections, customer service, and checking for California Code Compliance. Conducts inspections to ensure building construction is in compliance with the applicable municipal, state, and federal codes and ordinances. Reads and studies project specifications, plans, and drawings to become familiar with the project prior to inspection, confirming structural or architectural changes have been stamped as approved by the relevant authority. Documents inspections on construction projects to determine all aspects of the project such as foundations, building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems conform to the applicable building codes, zoning ordinances, energy conservation, and disabled access requirements.
Building Inspector 2
County of San Bernardino
2018 - 2019
Responsibilities included customer service, residential inspections, commercial inspections, blueprint reading, and code checking.
Building Inspector
Private Sector
2018 - 2019
Responsibilities included customer service, excel programming knowledge, windows programming knowledge, residential inspections, blueprint reading, some plan check, and code checking.
Senior Building Inspector
Private Sector
2021 - Current
Responsibilities include customer service, excel programming knowledge, windows programming, residential inspections, blueprint reading, and code checking.
EDUCATION
General Diploma
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
ICC Certified:
CA Residential Code Certification
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
20+
95 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
44 Staff Qualifications
Kirk Zimmerman
Building Inspector
Kirk brings 17+ years of experience in the construction industry in a variety of capacities and is an ICC certified commerical building and residential building inspector. He has broad project and managerial experience and is adept at communication and problem solving.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Building Inspector
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2023 - Present
Conducts inspections to ensure building construction is in compliance with the applicable municipal, state, and federal codes and ordinances. Reads and studies project specifications, plans, and drawings to become familiar with the project prior to inspection, confirming structural or architectural changes have been stamped as approved by the relevant authority. Documents inspections on construction projects to determine all aspects of the project such as foundations, building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems conform to the applicable building codes, zoning ordinances, energy conservation, and disabled access requirements.
QA/QC Inspector
Private Sector
2021 - 2022
• Technical audits of small business customers
• Verified salesperson’s assessment oflighting and refrigeration measures. • Perfomed replacement installations of lighting and refrigeration fan motors • Trained subcontractors on motor installations
• Performed post-installation inspections with SCE representatives Maintenance Manager
Tarzana Treatment Centers
2020
Assistant Operations Manager
Good Eggs, Inc.
2018 - 2020
Maintenance Manager
Lakeshore Pearl Apartments
2015 - 2018
EDUCATION
A.S., Power Plant Operations
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
ICC Certified:
Residential Building Inspector
Commercial Building Inspector
OSHA 30 Construction Certified
HVAC/EPA Certification
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
State of California Office of
Emergency Services (OES) Safety
Assessment Program
International Conference of
Building Officials (ICBO)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
17+
96 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
45 Staff Qualifications
EDUCATION
A.S., Architectural Drafting/
AutoCad Design Construction
Management
LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
ICC Certified:
Building Official
Building Code Official
Building Plans Examiner
UBC Electrical Plans Examiner
Plans Examiner
CBC CalGreen Plans Examiner
Building Inspector
UBC Building Inspector
Commercial Building Inspector
Residential Building Inspector
CalGreen Building Inspector
P .C. 832 P .O.ST. Certification
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council
Ventura Region Chapter (ICC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
36+
Todd Morris , C.B.O.
Building Official/Inspector/Code Enforcement
Todd has more than 36 years of experience in the Building Official sector. He plans, organizes, manages, and coordinates the daily operations of the Building Division, including issuance of building permits, plan reviews, scheduling and overseeing inspections, and providing assessment and resolution with regards to complex permit, code, and procedural questions and issues.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Building Official, Inspector and Code Enforcement Officer Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
2024 - present
Performs building official, inspection and code enforcement duties for various jurisdictions.
Chief Building Official
City of El Monte
2017-2021
Planned, directed, and managed all activities and operations of the Building Division including building inspection and code compliance; developed projects, including plans, maps, and the establishes conditions for improvement including financial obligations; made recommendations and administered policies and procedures. Reviewed complex plans for various industrial, commercial, residential and mixed use projects to ensure compliance with Federal, State and local Codes. Participated in the development and administration of the division’s budget; forecasted funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials, and supplies; approved expenditures and implemented budgetary adjustments as appropriate and necessary. Assisted at the public counter, coordinated with architects, contractors, and the general public regarding interpretation of requirements and restrictions. Performed staff training, evaluations, and development. Directed and managed all construction activities for various projects and infrastructures while maintaining cost restrains and meeting deadlines. Evaluated construction and determined cost-effectiveness of the project, prepared budget estimates, and progress reports.Managed the City’s real estate presale inspection program. Managed the business occupancy permit process and licenses.
Chief Building Official/Safety Division Manager
City of San Bernardino
2016 - 2017
Planned, directed, and managed all activities and operations of the Building Division including building inspection and code compliance; developed projects, including plans, maps, and the established conditions for improvement including financial obligations; recommended and administers policies and procedures. Reviewed complex plans for various industrial, commercial, residential, and mixed-use projects to ensure compliance with Federal, State and local Codes. Participated in the development and administration of the division’s budget; forecast funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials, and supplies; approved expenditures and implement budgetary adjustments as appropriate and necessary. Performed staff training, evaluations, and development. Assisted at the public counter; coordinated with architects, contractors, and the general public regarding interpretation of requirements and restrictions.
Directed and managed all construction activities for various projects and infrastructures while maintaining cost restraints and meeting deadlines. Evaluated construction and determine cost-effectiveness of projects, prepared budget estimates, and progress reports. 97 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
46 Staff Qualifications
Jason Pasiut, C.B.O., CASp
CASp Plan Review and Inspection
Jason has 20+ years of experience in the building safety industry and building department administration. As a Building Official, he has implemented excellent public service programs and gained an exceptional understanding of the building and safety division, community and economic development, public relations, redevelopment, financial and budget management, employee and organizational developments, and state and local officials. Jason has experience reviewing plans for building construction and alterations to ensure compliance with the applicable municipal, state, and federal codes and ordinances.
He also has experience conducting inspections to ensure building construction complies with the relevant municipal, state, and federal codes and ordinances. He can document inspections on construction projects to determine all aspects of the project, such as foundations, building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems, conform to the applicable building codes. Jason has outstanding public relations, management, and problem-solving skills with a proven record of strong and positive working relationships with local and state elected officials, inter-governmental agencies, business organizations, development communities, labor groups, community groups, and residents.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Building Official
City of Carlsbad
2020 - 2023
Managed the permitting, inspection, administrative and technical aspects of the Building Division which issued 5,000+ building permits per year in collaboration with other city divisions/departments. Led a team of 12 highly trained professionals who selflessly serve the citizens of Carlsbad. Created a virtual inspection program, inspection self-certification program, SolarAPP+ automated residential solar permit, redesigned web-site and forms and assisted in created 4 automated building permits. Served as Past president, ICC San Diego Chapter and also the CALBO Legislative Committee.
Plan Check Supervisor
Private Agency
2018 - 2020
Supervised a team of four plan examiners who complete residential, solar PV, and tenant improvement plan checks. Performed quality control checks of subordinate work. Create training plans to improve quality of reviews. Trained and mentored staff and provide administrative support. Created and updated policies, rules, and plan check templates.
Facilitated meetings, develop procedures, and respond to customer concerns. Managed a full plan check workload of 8-12 reviews per day.
Plan Examiner/Senior Inspector
Private Agency
2017 - 2018
Reviewed commercial and residential plans for minimum code compliance. Conducted Accessibility, Tenant Improvement, Fire, Residential, and P .V. Plan Checks for 61 jurisdictions.Assisted local Building Officials in resolving technical issues. Senior inspector on larger projects. (Hotel Del Coronado expansion, Sycuan and Viejas casinos).
EDUCATION
M.P .A., City Planning
B.S., Business Management
A.S, Business Administration
LICENSES/CERTIFICATION
ICC Certified:
Certified Building Official
Commercial Electrical Inspector
Residential Fire Sprinkler Plans
Examiner
Accessibility Inspector / Plans Examiner
UPC Plumbing Inspector
UMC Mechanical Inspector
Structural Masonry Special Inspector
Commercial Plan Examiner
Residential Plan Examiner Building
Inspector
CASp-886
Army Engineer Corps
California Safety Assessment Program -
Evaluator Certified
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
California Safety Assessment Program
U.S. Army
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
6+
98 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
47 Staff Qualifications
Shawn Ariannia, Ph.D., PE, GE | Principal
Geotechnical Engineer
Dr. Ariannia has over 38 years of experience in design, supervision, and technical management of projects in
structural and geotechnical fields. He has been involved in different types of projects such as
transportation/transit, highway/railroad bridges, tunnels, power plants, cooling towers, silos, and medium to high- rise multi-story structures. The breadth of his experience includes geotechnical analysis, field, and laboratory
testing management, slope stability and liquefaction
analysis, seismic hazard evaluation, pile and earth
retaining structures design, design and implementation
of soils and slope stabilization, repair and retrofit
methods relevant to soils, foundation, and structural
behavior for different types of constructions.
During the past two decades, Dr. Ariannia has actively
practiced geotechnical engineering and consulting in
Southern California. He has been Geotechnical
Engineer of Record for multiple transportation, aviation, educational, multi-story building/parking structure, and utility infrastructure projects. He has worked on several federally funded projects and is qualified to work on
federal jobs. He served as the principal geotechnical
engineer for various types of projects including:
Transportation, Pavement Engineering, Bridges,
and Parking Structures
Aviation, Ports, and Harbors
Public works, Cities, and Municipalities
Schools and Educational Facilities
Hospitals and Medical Facilities
Relevant Experience
Geotechnical Investigation and Materials
Testing for Walteria Reservoir Slope Repair
Project, City of Torrance, Torrance, CA
Principal-In-Charge/Principal Geotechnical
Engineer. GAI provided a geotechnical
investigation which included review of existing
soils reports, site reconnaissance and
subsurface exploration, laboratory testing,
design recommendations, a slope study
analysis, and final report. We also provided
geotechnical observation and materials testing
services during repair of the slope.
Geotechnical Constructability Plan Review
Services, Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
CA
Principal Geotechnical Engineer. Served as
Principal Geotechnical Engineer and performed
Education
Ph.D., Geotechnical
Engineering, University of
California, Los Angeles
(UCLA)
M.S., Civil Engineering,
University of Tehran
B.S., Civil Engineering,
University of Tehran
Registrations/Certifications/
Affiliations
Registered Geotechnical
Engineer: California, #2824
Professional Civil Engineer:
California, #65642
Asphalt Mix Design
Certification, Asphalt
Institute
Former Member of National
Science Review Panel, US
Past President, ASCE
Inland Empire Geotechnical
Committee
Cal Poly Pomona Industry
Advisory Committee,
Member
Areas of Expertise
38+ years of experience in
civil engineering and
geotechnical engineering
projects for public and
private clients
Saved hundreds of
thousands of dollars for
clients by providing high
quality yet economic
alternate geotechnical
value engineering solutions
High extent of familiarity
with all the tasks involved in
transportation projects
Vast knowledge and
experience in geotechnical
seismic rehabilitation study
and site-specific
evaluations
Extensive experience in
pavement design, retrofit
and management projects
with various cities in
Southern California
99 BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
48 Staff Qualifications
a geotechnical constructability review for the Port of Los Angeles developments including C Street/I-110 Freeway Access Ramp Im provements, Harry Bridges Boulevard Undercrossing, Bridge No. 53-3048S and retaining walls 318 and 320. Vallejo Navigation Center Project, City of Vallejo, Vallejo, CA Principal Geotechnical Engineer. GAI performed a plan review for a planned navigation center at an approximately 1-acre, undeveloped site in the City of Vallejo, CA, as a subconsultant to CSG Consultants. The main structures will either be comprised of Sprung StructuresTM and/or steel containers supported on mat slab foundations, spread footings, drilled piers, and/or earth anchors.
Geotechnical Constructability Plan Review Services, Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Principal Geotechnical Engineer. Served as Principal Geotechnical Engineer and performed a geotechnical constructability review for the Port of Los Angeles developments including C Street/I-110 Freeway Access Ramp Improvements, Harry Bridges Boulevard Undercrossing, Bridge No. 53-3048S and retaining walls 318 and 320. Geotechnical and Rough Grading Plan Review Services, Tract No.78210 Lots 1 Through 213, City of Walnut, Walnut, CA
Principal Geotechnical Engineer. Performed a geotechnical and rough grading plan review for a property tract. Acting as a third-party reviewer, evaluated the geotechnical reports, amendments, and grading plans prepared by others. Also reviewed the MSE retaining wall design for the walls within the property, from a geotechnical standpoint. The purpose of GAI’s review was to determine whether the submitted reports and plans complied with applicable building codes and contained an acceptable level of information for the design and construction of the project.
On-Call Private Land Development-Plan Check Services, City of Eastvale, Eastvale, CA Principal Geotechnical Engineer. GAI is a subconsultant to CSG Consultants to provide plan review for various projects under this 3-year contract with 2 one-year extensions options.
On-Call Land Development Expedited Processing Services, Orange County Public Works, Orange County, CA
Principal Geotechnical Engineer. GAI is a subconsultant to CSG Consultants to provide geotechnical review for various projects under this 3 to 5 five-year on-call contract. As-Needed Geotechnical Professional and Technical Services, County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Los Angeles, CA
Principal Geotechnical Engineer . GAI has been providing geotechnical services for multiple projects to the County of Los Angeles on an as-needed basis since 2017. Our field engineers recently performed infiltration tests at various locations for two task order projects.
Grading and Improvement Plan Review for New House, Stanton, CA Principal Geotechnical Engineer. GAI is a subconsultant to CSG Consultants to provide grading and plan review at 11572 Court Lane, Stanton, CA 92804. Geotechnical Reports and Grading Plan Review Services, City of South Pasadena, South Pasadena, CA Principal Geotechnical Engineer . GAI, as a subconsultant to Transtech Engineers, performed geotechnical and grading plan review for the projects within the City of South Pasadena, California. Acting as a third-party reviewer, we evaluated the geotechnical reports, amendments, and grading plans prepared by others.
The purpose of GAI’s review was to determine whether the submitted reports and plans complied with applicable building codes and contained an acceptable level of information for the design and construction of the project.
Value Engineering for Cienega Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, City of San Dimas, San Dimas, CA Project Manager/Principal Geotechnical Engineer. GAI performed field sampling, lab testing, and provided an optimum design for the pavement section and cement-treated base part of it. Our study resulted in a more coherent design for the targeted design traffic, and significantly reduced the volume of fieldwork and materials, such as reduction in thickness of cement-treated base section by about 15 percent. 100
BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
49 Staff Qualifications
Ronald Hanson, CEG, PG | Principal Engineering
Geologist
Mr. Hanson is a California Professional Geologist with
over 39 years of experience in performing geological
and geotechnical investigations, geologic/soils
inspections, and preparing geological reports. He has
worked on numerous grading operations, including the
CC Ranch project in Castaic, CA (a large project that
consisted of moving four million yards of soil), where he acted as the head geologic inspector. He also performed geologic mapping for fault evaluations at SAWPA
Tunnel and Seven Oaks Dam and worked on widening
the Garden Grove Freeway (State Route 22-OCTA),
inspecting fill slopes, sub-grade preparation, and over- excavation of unsuitable material and bridge widening
related tasks. He has served as the public works
inspector for several projects, including street and
highway improvements in Southern California.
Relevant Experience
Geotechnical and Rough Grading Plan
Review Services, Tract No.78210 Lots 1
Through 213, City of Walnut, Walnut, CA
Principal Engineering Geologist. Performed a
geotechnical and rough grading plan review for
a property tract. Acting as a third-party reviewer,
evaluated the geotechnical reports,
amendments, and grading plans prepared by
others. Also reviewed the MSE retaining wall
design for the walls within the property, from a
geotechnical standpoint. The purpose of GAI’s
review was to determine whether the submitted
reports and plans complied with applicable
building codes and contained an acceptable
level of information for the design and
construction of the project.
Geotechnical Services for Torrance Transit
Park and Ride Regional Terminal, Phase I-
Rough Grading, City of Torrance, Torrance,
CA
Field Supervisor, Principal Engineering
Geologist. In charge of the inspection team
providing geotechnical services, grading
observation, and soils testing for different
components of the project including a proposed
one-story and a proposed two-story building, bus
platform, canopies, and pavement of the
designated areas. The purpose of testing and
inspection of the grading operations was to verify
that the completed work complied with the
project plans, specifications, special provisions,
Education
B.S., Geology, California
State University, Los
Angeles (CSULA)
Graduate Courses in
Geology, California State
University, Los Angeles
(CSULA)
Registrations/Certifications/
Affiliations
California Certified
Engineering Geologist
#1841
California Professional
Geologist #5143
City of Los Angeles Deputy
Grading Inspector
(#P022551)
ICC Soils Special Inspector
(#8049864)
Caltrans CTM Certs.: 125,
231, 375
OSHA-30
Nuclear Gauge Operator
Training
Confined Spaces & Permit
Required Confined Spaces
(GI)
HAZWOPER-40
Geological Society of
America, Member
Areas of Expertise
39+ years of experience in
geotechnical investigations,
inspections, geological
investigations and public
works inspections
For SR-22 Freeway,
worked as the supervising
grading inspector and
supervised a team of 10
Caltrans inspectors for
grading and testing
Experience in the
inspection of federally and
state funded projects in
compliance with Caltrans
Local Assistance
Procedures Manual (LAPM)
101
BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
50 Staff Qualifications
and geotechnical recommendations. Project Cost: $20 million On-Call Private Land Development-Plan Check Services, City of Eastvale, Eastvale, CA
Principal Engineering Geologist. GAI is a subconsultant to CSG Consultants to provide plan review for various projects under this 3-year contract with 2 one-year extensions options.
On-Call Land Development Expedited Processing Services, Orange County Public Works, Orange County, CA
Principal Engineering Geologist. GAI is a subconsultant to CSG Consultants to provide geotechnical review for various projects under this 3 to 5 five-year on-call contract. Grading and Improvement Plan Review for New House, Stanton, CA Principal Engineering Geologist. GAI is a subconsultant to CSG Consultants to provide grading and plan review at 11572 Court Lane, Stanton, CA 92804. Geotechnical Inspection for Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation as a Part of the City’s CIP, City of La Mirada, La Mirada, CA
Field Operation Manager . In charge of the inspection team for this neighborhood pavement rehabilitation project. Project Cost: $3.9 million Pavement Evaluation, Testing, and Inspection for Rehabilitation of Various City Streets, City of Pomona, Pomona, CA
Field Supervisor/Princi pal Engineering Geologist. GAI provided a comprehensive geotechnical/pavement engineering study for various streets within the city. Resident Inspector Services for Rosemead Boulevard Safety Enhancement and Beautification, City of Temple City, Temple City, CA
Inspector of Record. Provided the resident inspector of record services for this federally funded project which consisted of approximately 2 miles of streetscape enhancements on Rosemead Boulevard. Project Cost: $30 million
Materials Testing and Inspection for Redondo Beach South Bay Regional Intermodal Transit Center, City of Redondo Beach, Redondo Beach, CA Senior Inspector. GAI provided during construction geotechnical and materials inspection and testing services. Our scope of work included field monitoring, testing and inspection for the grading work, laboratory tests on soils, base asphalt, and concrete; and preparing and submitting daily inspection reports. The pr oject involved the construction of a new transit center on Kingsdale Avenue which included the construction of a new transit building, bus bays, retaining walls, parking lot, and associated appurtenances. Project Cost: $11.5 million
Geotechnical Engineering Services for a Parking Structure at the Corner of C Street and Lemon Avenue, City of Ontario, Ontario, CA
Principal Engineering Geologist. Performed a geotechnical and geohazard investigation and provided recommendations for the design and construction of the parking structure.
GAI’s scope of work included providing a field exploratory program, performing laboratory testing, and office engineering, and providing the final report. The project included a nearly 15,000 sf. parking structure with associated improvements designed per the 2019 California Building Code.
Geotechnical Constructability Plan Review Services, Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Principal Engineering Geologist . Served as Principal Engineering Geologist and performed a geotechnical constructability review for the Port of Los Angeles developments including C Street/I-110 Freeway Access Ramp Improvements, Harry Bridges Boulevard Undercrossing, Bridge No. 53-3048S and retaining walls 318 and 320. Vallejo Navigation Center Project, City of Vallejo, Vallejo, CA Principal Engineering Geologist. GAI performed a plan review for a planned navigation center at an approximately 1-acre, undeveloped site in the City of Vallejo, CA, as a subconsultant to CSG Consultants. The main structures will either be comprised of Sprung StructuresTM and/or steel containers supported on mat slab foundations, spread footings, drilled piers, and/or earth anchors.
102
BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
51 Staff Qualifications
CURRENT LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATIONS
Below is evidence of licensure and certifications for the project team dedicated to the City of Torrance’s needs.
This includes licensing information from the Department of Consumer Affairs’ Agency and the International Code Council (ICC).
103
BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
52 Staff Qualifications
104
BUREAU VERITAS 250 N Westlake Blvd STE 150, Westlake Village, CA 91362 P 805.230.2888 | www.bvna.com
53 Staff Qualifications
105
www.bvna.com
106
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of July 1, 2025 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF TORRANCE, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and m6 Consulting, Inc., a California corporation. (“CONSULTANT”).
RECITALS:
A.
B.
CITY wishes to retain the services of an experienced and qualified CONSULTANT to provide the Community Development Department expedited plan check services for various projects on an "as-needed" basis.
In order to obtain the desired services, CITY has circulated its Request for Proposal for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis, RFP No. B2024-15 (the “RFP”). A true and correct copy of the RFP is attached herein as Exhibit A.
C.
D.
CONSULTANT has submitted a Proposal (the “Proposal”) in response to the RFP. In its Proposal CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform those services requested in the RFP. A true and correct copy of the Proposal is attached herein as Exhibit B.
Based upon its review of all proposals submitted in response to the RFP, CITY now wishes to award this Agreement to CONSULTANT.
AGREEMENT:
1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT will provide the services and install those materials listed in CONSULTANT’s Proposal submitted in response to the RFP. A true and correct copy of the RFP is attached herein as Exhibit A. A true and correct copy of the Proposal is attached herein as Exhibit B. CONSULTANT warrants that all work and services set forth in the Proposal will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner.
2. 3.
TERM
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Paragraph 4 below, this Agreement will continue in full force and effect from the Effective Date through June 30, 2030.
COMPENSATION
A. CONSULTANT’s Fee.
For services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT will be paid in accordance with the Compensation Schedule set forth in the Proposal; provided, however, that in no event will the total amount of money paid CONSULTANT, for services initially contemplated by this 1 Attachment 3
107
Agreement, exceed the sum of $2,500,000 (the “Agreement Sum”), unless otherwise first approved in writing by CITY.
B. Schedule of Payment.
Provided that CONSULTANT is not in default under the terms of this Agreement, upon presentation of an invoice, CONSULTANT will be paid the fees described in Paragraph 3.A. above, according to the Compensation Schedule. Payment will be due within 30 days after the date of the invoice.
4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. Termination by CITY for Convenience.
1. 2.
CITY may, at any time, terminate the Agreement for CITY’s convenience and without cause.
Upon receipt of written notice from CITY of such termination for CITY’s convenience, CONSULTANT will:
a.
b.
cease operations as directed by CITY in the notice;
take actions necessary, or that CITY may direct, for the protection and preservation of the work; and
c. except for work directed to be performed prior to the effective date of termination stated in the notice, terminate all existing subcontracts and purchase orders and enter into no further subcontracts and purchase orders.
3. In case of termination for CITY’s convenience, CONSULTANT will be entitled to receive payment for work executed, together with costs incurred by reason of the termination, along with reasonable overhead and profit on work not executed.
B. Termination for Cause.
1. If either party fails to perform any term, covenant or condition in this Agreement and that failure continues for 15 calendar days after the nondefaulting party gives the defaulting party written notice of the failure to perform, this Agreement may be terminated for cause; provided, however, that if during the notice period the defaulting party has promptly commenced and continues diligent efforts to remedy the default, the defaulting party will have such additional time as is reasonably necessary to remedy the default.
2. In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the default of CONSULTANT, CITY may, at the expense of CONSULTANT
and its surety, complete this Agreement or cause it to be completed. Any check or bond delivered to the CITY in connection with this Agreement, and the money payable thereon, will be 2 108
forfeited to and remain the property of the CITY. All moneys due CONSULTANT under the terms of this Agreement will be retained by CITY, but the retention will not release CONSULTANT and its surety from liability for the default. Under these circumstances, however, CONSULTANT and its surety will be credited with the amount of money retained, toward any amount by which the cost of completion exceeds the Agreement Sum and any amount
authorized for extra services.
3. Termination for cause will not affect or terminate any of the rights of CITY as against CONSULTANT or its surety then existing, or that may thereafter accrue because of the default; this provision is in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the CITY under law.
C. Termination for Breach of Law.
In the event CONSULTANT or any of its officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, subsidiaries or affiliates is convicted (i) of a criminal offense as an incident to obtaining or attempting to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or in the performance of a contract or subcontract; (ii) under state or federal statutes of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that currently, seriously, and directly affects responsibility as a public consultant or CONSULTANT; (iii) under state or federal antitrust statutes arising out of the submission of bids or proposals; or (iv) of violation of Paragraph 19 of this Agreement; or for any other cause CITY determines to be so serious and compelling as to affect CONSULTANT’s responsibility as a public consultant or CONSULTANT, including but not limited to, debarment by another governmental agency, then CITY reserves the unilateral right to terminate this Agreement or to impose such other sanctions (which may include financial sanctions, temporary suspensions or any other condition deemed appropriate short of termination) as it deems proper. CITY will not take action until CONSULTANT has been given notice and an opportunity to present evidence in mitigation.
5. FORCE MAJEURE
If any party fails to perform its obligations because of strikes, lockouts, labor disputes, embargoes, acts of God, inability to obtain labor or materials or reasonable substitutes for labor or materials, governmental restrictions, governmental regulations, governmental control, judicial orders, enemy or hostile governmental action, civil commotion, fire or other casualty, or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the party obligated to perform, then that party’s performance will be excused for a period equal to the period of that cause for failure to perform.
///
3 109
6. RETENTION OF FUNDS
CONSULTANT authorizes CITY to deduct from any amount payable to CONSULTANT (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute or that are necessary to compensate CITY for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by CITY, and all amounts for which CITY may be liable to third parties, by reason of CONSULTANT’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform CONSULTANT’s obligations under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by CONSULTANT, or any indebtedness exists that appears to be the basis for a claim of lien, CITY may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of the withholding, an amount sufficient to cover the claim. The failure of CITY to exercise the right to deduct or to withhold will not, however, affect the obligations of CONSULTANT to insure, indemnify, and protect CITY as elsewhere provided in this Agreement.
7. CITY REPRESENTATIVE
Uykheang Keo, Building Official, Community Development Department is designated as the “City Representative,” authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work and services specified in this Agreement and to make all decisions in connection with this Agreement. Whenever approval, directions, or other actions are required by CITY under this Agreement, those actions will be taken by the City Representative, unless otherwise stated. The City Manager has the right to designate another City Representative at any time, by providing notice to CONSULTANT.
8. CONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE(S)
The following principal(s) of CONSULTANT are designated as being the principal(s) and representative(s) of CONSULTANT authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified in this Agreement and make all decisions in connection with this Agreement:
Robert Woodward, Principal Engineer
Masoud Mahmoud, Principal Engineer
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT is, and at all times will remain as to CITY, a wholly independent contractor. Neither CITY nor any of its agents will have control over the conduct of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT’s employees, except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement. CONSULTANT’s agents and employees are not and shall not be considered employees of CITY for any purpose. CONSULTANT may not, at any time or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of CITY. CITY has no duty, obligation, or responsibility to CONSULTANT’s agents or employees under the Affordable Care Act. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for any tax penalties associated with the failure to offer affordable coverage to its agents and employees under the Affordable Care Act and any other liabilities, claims and obligations regarding compliance with the Affordable Care Act with respect to CONSULTANT’s agents and employees. CITY is not responsible and shall not be held liable for CONSULTANT’s failure to comply with CONSULTANT’s duties, 4 110
obligations, and responsibilities under the Affordable Care Act. CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold CITY harmless for any and all taxes and penalties that may be assessed against CITY as a result of CONSULTANT’s obligations under the Affordable Care Act relating to CONSULTANT’s agents and employees.
10. 11.
12. BUSINESS LICENSE
CONSULTANT must obtain a City business license prior to the start of work under this Agreement, unless CONSULTANT is qualified for an exemption.
OTHER LICENSES AND PERMITS
CONSULTANT warrants that it has all professional, contracting and other permits and licenses required to undertake the work contemplated by this Agreement.
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK
By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT (a) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services required under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of the services set forth in this Agreement.
Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that will materially affect the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement, CONSULTANT must immediately inform CITY of that fact and may not proceed except at CONSULTANT’s risk until written instructions are received from CITY.
13. 14.
CARE OF WORK
CONSULTANT must adopt reasonable methods during the term of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and other components to prevent losses or damages, and will be responsible for all damages to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by CITY, except those losses or damages as may be caused by CITY’s own negligence.
CONSULTANT’S ACCOUNTING RECORDS; OTHER PROJECT RECORDS
Records of CONSULTANT’s time pertaining to the project, and records of accounts between CITY and CONSULTANT, will be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis. CONSULTANT will also maintain all other records, including without limitation, specifications, drawings, progress reports and the like, relating to the work and services identified in Exhibit A. All records will be available to CITY during normal working hours. CONSULTANT will maintain these records for three years after final payment.
15. INDEMNIFICATION
CONSULTANT will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Torrance, the City Council, each member thereof, present and future, members of boards and 5 111
commissions, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively “City Affiliates”) from and against any and all liability, expenses, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damages whatsoever, including, but not limited to, those arising from breach of contract, bodily injury, death, personal injury, property damage, loss of use, or property loss however the same may be caused and regardless of the responsibility for negligence. The obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless includes, but is not limited to, any liability or expense, including defense costs and legal fees, arising from the negligent acts or omissions, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, subCONSULTANTs or vendors. CONSULTANT’s obligations to indemnify, defend and hold harmless will apply even in the event of concurrent negligence on the part of City Affiliates, except for liability resulting solely from the negligence or willful misconduct of City Affiliates. Payment by CITY is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this indemnity. In the event of any dispute between CONSULTANT and CITY, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence of City Affiliates, CONSULTANT will be obligated to pay for the defense of City Affiliates until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City Affiliates as solely negligent. CONSULTANT will not be entitled in the event of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and costs of litigation.
16. 17.
NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
No officer or employee of CITY will be personally liable to CONSULTANT, in the event of any default or breach by the CITY or for any amount that may become due to CONSULTANT.
INSURANCE
A. CONSULTANT and its subCONSULTANTs must maintain for the duration of the Agreement at their sole expense the following insurance, which will be full coverage not subject to self-insurance provisions:
1. Automobile Liability, including owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, with at least the following limits of liability:
a.
b.
c.
Primary Bodily Injury with limits of at least $500,000 per person, $1,000,000 per occurrence; and
Primary Property Damage of at least $250,000 per
occurrence; or
Combined single limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence.
2. ///
Commercial General Liability including coverage for premises, products and completed operations, independent
CONSULTANTs/vendors, personal injury and contractual
obligations with combined single limits of coverage of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 aggregate.
6 112
3. 4.
Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and, if workers' compensation is required, employer's liability insurance with minimum limits of ($1,000,000) per occurrence or occupational illness. The Workers' Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the CITY for all work performed by the CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subconsultants.
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT’S profession, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $4,000,000 aggregate.
B.
C.
The insurance provided by CONSULTANT will be primary and non- contributory.
CITY, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Torrance, the City Council and each member thereof, members of boards and commissions, every officer, agent, official, employee and volunteer must be named as additional insureds under the automobile and general liability policies.
D. CONSULTANT must provide certificates of insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) indicating appropriate coverage, to the City Clerk of the City of Torrance before the commencement of work.
E.
F.
Each insurance policy required by this Paragraph must contain a provision that no termination, cancellation or change of coverage can be made without notice to the CITY.
If the CONSULTANT maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the CONSULTANT. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY.
G.
H.
The procuring of insurance shall not be construed as a limitation on liability nor as full performance of the indemnification provisions of the CONSULTANT.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
a. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
7 113
b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
c. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Vendor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.
I. CONSULTANT hereby grants to CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
J. Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY.
The CITY may require the CONSULTANT to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY.
18. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURERS
Insurance required by this Agreement will be satisfactory only if issued by companies admitted to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless these requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of CITY (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. In the event the Risk Manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to CITY, the CONSULTANT agrees that the minimum limits of any insurance policies or performance bonds required by this Agreement may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager; provided that CONSULTANT will have the right to appeal a determination of increased coverage by the Risk Manager to the City Council of CITY within 10 days of receipt of notice from the Risk Manager.
19. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
A. No officer or employee of the CITY may have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor may any officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement that affects the officer or employee’s financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which the officer or employee is, directly or indirectly interested, in violation of any law, rule or regulation.
B. No person may offer, give, or agree to give any officer or employee or former officer or employee, nor may any officer or employee solicit, 8 114
demand, accept, or agree to accept from another person, a gratuity or an offer of employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, preparation or any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any way pertaining to any program requirement, contract or subcontract, or to any solicitation or proposal.
20. NOTICE
A. All notices, requests, demands, or other communications under this Agreement will be in writing. Notice will be sufficiently given for all purposes as follows:
1. 2.
Personal delivery. When personally delivered to the recipient, notice is effective on delivery.
First Class mail. When mailed first class to the last address of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective three mail delivery days after deposit in a United States Postal Service office or mailbox.
3. 4.
Certified mail. When mailed certified mail, return receipt requested, notice is effective on receipt, if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt.
Overnight delivery. When delivered by an overnight delivery service, charges prepaid or charged to the sender’s account, notice is effective on delivery, if delivery is confirmed by the delivery service.
5. 6.
Facsimile transmission. When sent by fax to the last fax number of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective on receipt. Any notice given by fax will be deemed received on the next business day if it is received after 5:00 p.m. (recipient’s time) or on a non-business day.
Addresses for purpose of giving notice are as follows:
CONSULTANT: m6 Consulting Inc.
893 Patriot Drive
Unit E
Moorpark, CA 93021
Fax: N/A
CITY: City Clerk
City of Torrance
3031 Torrance Boulevard
Torrance, CA 90503
Fax: (310) 618-2931
9 115
B.
C.
Any correctly addressed notice that is refused, unclaimed, or undeliverable because of an act or omission of the party to be notified, will be deemed effective as of the first date the notice was refused, unclaimed or deemed undeliverable by the postal authorities, messenger or overnight delivery service.
Either party may change its address or fax number by giving the other party notice of the change in any manner permitted by this Agreement.
21. 22.
PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement and all exhibits are binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties. The Agreement may not be assigned or subcontracted by either CITY or CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of the other.
INTEGRATION; AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained in it. No prior oral or written understanding will be of any force or effect with respect to the terms of this Agreement. The Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both parties.
23. 24.
INTERPRETATION
The terms of this Agreement should be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and should not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or by any other rule of construction that might otherwise apply. To the extent that the terms of the RFP or Proposal are inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
SEVERABILITY
If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, that part will be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with any applicable laws, but the remainder of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
25. 26.
TIME OF ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
GOVERNING LAW; JURISDICTION
This Agreement will be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Jurisdiction of any litigation arising from the Agreement will be in Los Angeles County, California.
27. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTES AND REGULATIONS
CONSULTANT will be knowledgeable of and will comply with all applicable federal, state, county and city statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances and orders. ///
///
10 116
28. WAIVER OF BREACH
No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a nondefaulting party on any default will impair the right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
A party’s consent or approval of any act by the other party requiring the first party’s consent or approval will not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and will not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
29. ATTORNEY’S FEES
Except as provided for in Paragraph 15, in any dispute, litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding by which one party either seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement (whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing party will be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees, together with any costs and expenses, to resolve the dispute and to enforce any judgment.
30. 31.
EXHIBITS
All exhibits identified in this Agreement are incorporated into the Agreement by this reference.
CONSULTANT’S AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT warrant that (i) CONSULTANT is duly organized and existing; (ii) they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT; (iii) by so executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement; and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which CONSULTANT is bound.
32. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
Any documents submitted by the CONSULTANT; all information obtained in connection with the CITY’s right to audit and inspect the CONSULTANT’s documents, books, and accounting records pursuant to paragraph 14 CONSULTANT’s Accounting Records; Other Project Records; as well as those documents which were required to be submitted in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) used in the solicitation process for this Contract become the exclusive property of the City. All such documents become a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public records. Exceptions will be those elements in the California Government Code Section 7920.000 et seq. (Public Records Act) and which are marked “trade secret”, “confidential”, or “proprietary”.
The CITY shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records including, without limitation, those so marked, if disclosure is required by law, or by an order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. ///
///
///
11 117
In the event the CITY is required to defend an action on a Public Records Act request for any of the aforementioned documents, information, books, records, and/or contents of a proposal marked “trade secret”, “confidential”, or “proprietary”, the CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify the CITY from all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, in action or liability arising under the Public Records Act.
CITY OF TORRANCE, m6 Consulting, Inc.,
a municipal corporation a California corporation,
By: ____________________________
George K. Chen, Mayor
By: _______________________________
Robert Woodward
Principal Engineer/Plan Check Supervisor
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________
Rebecca Poirier, MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN
City Attorney
By: ____________________________
Galen W. Bean
Deputy City Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Request for Proposal for Expedited Plan Check
Services for Community Development Department on
an as Needed Basis, RFP No. B2024-15
m6 Consulting, Inc.’s Proposal
Rev. 0424
12 118
EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR EXPEDITED PLAN CHECK SERVICES FOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, RFP NO. B2024-15
[To be attached]
119
EXHIBIT ARequest for Proposals (RFP)
City of Torrance | 3031 Torrance Blvd, Torrance CA 90503 | www.TorranceCA.Gov RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community DevelopmentRFP No. B2024-15 Department on an as Needed Basis RFP Submittal Information
No mail or hand delivered Proposals. No faxed proposals.
No Late proposals.
Location: City of Torrance
Purchasing Division
3031 Torrance Blvd.
Torrance, CA 90503
Date: December 16, 2024
Time Deadline: 12:00 p.m. Local (Pacific) Time
Submittal Requirements
Your submittal must include the following:
•
•
Vendor’s Response (Section III of this document) on the forms provided. If additional space is required, please attach additional pages.
Bidders Affidavit (Attachment 1)
• Brief summary of your firm, its capabilities, and its recent experience. Also, describe your demonstrated experience with similar projects and qualification including professional licenses and certifications.
• Qualifications of the consultant and references from cities and/or counties that have contracted for similar services from the consultant. Past experience checking plans for local jurisdictions. • Qualifications of the plans reviewers who will be providing services.
Proposers will be disqualified if their proposal does not include the above items.
Prior to the award of a Contract
The successful vendor, must submit the following to the City of Torrance •
•
Proof of insurance and applicable bonds, as indicated in the terms and conditions of this RFP document.
Proof of a City of Torrance Business License, please contact the City of Torrance Business License Office at (310) 618-5923.
Questions Regarding this RFP Must be Submitted on PlanetBids The deadline to submit questions is 12:00 Noon Pacific Time on Monday, December 9, 2024.
•
• All questions regarding this RFP must be submitted online. 1 120
RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed BasisRFP No. B2024-15
SECTION I RFP INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION
Notice is hereby given that sealed proposals will be received online until 12:00 p.m. December 16, 2024.
The City of Torrance:
The City of Torrance is on the western side of Los Angeles County. It is boarded by the Palos Verdes Peninsula on the south, the City of Gardena on the north, the City of Redondo Beach on the north and west boundaries, the City of Lomita on the east and the Pacific Ocean on the west. The City encompasses an area of approximately 21 square miles, 329 miles of Streets, 1870 intersections, 550 miles of sidewalks, 47,000 Street Trees, 6 Public Libraries, a Municipal Airport, Transit System, 46 Parks & Recreation Amenities, 6 Fire Stations, 1 Police Station and 1 Police Community Center, and has an estimated population of approximately 146,115, which makes Torrance one of the top 10 cities in Los Angeles County in regards to population.
Background:
The City of Torrance (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) is requesting for proposals (RFP) from qualified firms with experience in providing expedited plan check for the City’s Building and Safety Division of the Community Development Department on an as needed basis. The selected firms will work with the Building Official and their staffs to review plans and documents for code compliance.
Services include, but not limited to, review of commercial, residential, industrial plans and documents for compliance with the current edition of the California Building Standards Code as adopted and amended by the City of Torrance, City of Torrance Ordinances, and all applicable codes and statutes.
Definitions:
Word
City
Definition as applied to this RFP
The City of Torrance, California
Vendor, Contractor,
Proposer, Firm or
Consultant
The person, firm, company or corporation providing services to the City, or submitting a proposal in response to this RFP
Contract, Purchase
Order, Agreement,
Purchasing Agreement
The agreement between the awarded Vendor and the City as a result of this Request for Proposals
Proposal Submittal Form:
Prospective bidders must submit bids in electronic only format at https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/47426/portal-home; The proposal must be made on the form provided and uploaded on PlanetBids.
Scan and attach the following required documents to your eBid. This list may not be all-inclusive; additional items may be required elsewhere in bid specifications. Failure to provide required documents with bid may cause the bid to be deemed non-responsive.) If an individual makes the proposal, it must be signed by that individual, with an address and telephone number. If made by a business entity, it must be signed by an authorized person that executes binding agreements and contracts. A full business address and telephone are required. 2 121
Blank spaces in the proposal form must be completed using ink, indelible pencil, typewriter or digitally.
The text of the proposal form must not be changed and no additions. Any unauthorized conditions, limitations, or provisos attached to a proposal will render it informal and may cause its rejection.
Alterations by erasure or interlineations must be explained or noted in the proposal form over the signature of the Proposer.
Questions:
All questions regarding this RFP must be submitted online no later than 12:00 PM Monday, December 9, 2024. Answers to questions will be posted online for all interested bidders to review.
Bidders who have downloaded bid documents by the time that the questions are responded to will receive an automated email notifying them of additional information and/or addendums that have been posted to the website. No questions via telephone. No questions submitted after deadline.
Written answers and any other changes to the RFP will be sent via Planetbids to all known prospective proposers as an addendum to the RFP.
Errors and Omissions:
The proposer may not take advantage of any errors and/or omissions in these specifications or in the proposer’s specifications submitted with its proposal. If there are errors or omissions, you will be notified.
Proposers Examination of Requirements:
The Proposer is required to examine carefully the site, the instructions, information and specifications of this document, investigate the conditions, the character, quality and quantity of work to be performed as required by this document. Submission of a proposal will be considered prima facie evidence that the Proposer has made such examination.
Reservation:
The City reserves the right to revise or amend these specifications prior to the date set for opening proposals. Revisions and amendments will be identified by an addendum to this RFP. If the revisions require additional time to enable vendors to respond, the City may postpone the opening date accordingly. In such case, the addendum will include an announcement of the new proposal submittal due date.
Attach all addenda to the proposal. Failure to attach any addendum may render the proposal non- responsive and cause for rejection.
The City reserves the right to award a contract to a company solely based on the initial proposal submitted. The City reserves the right to require more information and clarification on information submitted in the proposal to complete the evaluation.
The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all proposals received, to take all proposals under advisement for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days after the date of the opening, to waive any informality on any proposal, and to be the sole judge of the relative merits of the material and or service mentioned in the respective proposals received. The City reserves the right to reject any proposal not accompanied with all data or information required. 3 122
This Request for Proposals does not commit the City to award a contract or to pay any cost incurred in the preparation of a proposal. All responses to this RFP document become the property of the City of Torrance.
The City reserves the right to examine all factors bearing on a Proposer’s ability to perform the services under the contract. The City reserves the right to reject any proposal not accompanied with all data or information required. The City reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, without penalty, at its sole discretion.
Affidavit:
An affidavit form is enclosed. It must be completed signifying that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or made in the interest or on behalf of any person not named in the proposal, that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a sham proposal or any other person, firm, or corporation to refrain from proposing, and that the proposer has not in any manner sought by collusion to secure for itself an advantage over any other proposer. Any proposal submitted without an affidavit or in violation of this requirement will be rejected. (Attachment 1)
License Requirements:
The successful proposer is required to show proof of a current license of the following:
• Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of California in Civil, Structural and Geotechnical • Certified Access Specialist (CASp) certification from California Division of State Architect • Certified Plans Examiners
Evaluation of Proposals:
The City will be the sole determiner of suitability to the City’s needs. Proposals are rated according to their completeness and understanding of the City’s needs, conformance to the requirements of the technical specifications, compatibility with the City’s current technology and operations, prior experience with similar scope of work, financial capabilities, delivery, and cost. Cost including any ongoing maintenance and support cost are reviewed to determine which proposal best meets the needs of the City.
The City will take into consideration a local Torrance vendor sales tax rebate of 1.50% for proposals submitted by a Torrance vendor that include a material component.
The City’s project evaluation team will evaluate proposals based on the evaluation criteria listed below. Points will be assigned to each criterion up to a maximum of 100 points. Proposals will be ranked and that ranking will be made public.
Subsequently, the City may interview a qualified Firm, prior to deciding whether to recommend the award of an Agreement.
4 123
Description of Evaluation Criteria
Firm’s qualifications and experience with similar projects Qualifications of proposed project team
Possible Points
30 20
20 10
Cost and Cost Effectiveness
Understanding of the project and scope of work; and completeness of RFP
Relevant projects of proposed project team members
Staffing (On-site Staffing)
10 10
Maximum Total Points = 100
PART I – EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS: After receipt of proposals for this project, the City’s project evaluation committee will evaluate proposals based on the criteria listed below (with exception of cost), and develop a short list of qualified Firms. The Firms on this short list will be invited to interview with the City.
PART II – INTERVIEW: An interview will be held for qualified firms at the discretion of the City.
The Contract:
The awarded vendor will be required to enter into a written contract with the City of Torrance. A copy of the standardized contract, which will be modified to reflect the awarded RFP, is attached to the documents section in PlanetBids. A copy of this RFP and the accepted proposal will be attached to and become a part of the contract.
Contract Term:
The initial contract will be for a period of five years from December 15, 2024.
Consumer Price Index:
If the contract is extended after the initial period, commencing in the subsequent year, the contract may be increased by the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the Los Angeles area (April-to-April).
Independent Contractor:
The successful proposer will at all times remain to the City, a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its agents will have control over the conduct of the Contractor or any of the Contractor’s employees, except as otherwise set forth in the awarded Agreement. The Contractor’s agents and employees are not and will not be considered employees of the City for any purpose. The Contractor may not, at any time or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. The City has no duty, obligation, or responsibility to the Contractor’s agents or employees under the Affordable Care Act. The Contractor is solely responsible for any tax penalties associated with the failure to offer affordable coverage to its agents and employees under the Affordable Care Act and any other liabilities, claims and obligations regarding compliance with the Affordable Care Act with respect to the Contractor’s agents and employees. The City is not responsible or liable for the Contractor’s failure to comply with the 5 124
Contractor’s duties, obligations, and responsibilities under the Affordable Care Act. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless for all taxes and penalties that may be assessed against the City because of the Contractor’s obligations under the Affordable Care Act relating to the Contractor’s agents and employees.
Payments:
Complete payment on the contract price will be made in approximately thirty (30) days from date of delivery, or completion and acceptance, unless otherwise provided for in Proposer’s proposal or in these specifications. Payments will be made upon verification and acceptance by the City of contract services performed and upon the City’s receipt of a correct invoice.
Suspension of Procurement:
The City may suspend, in writing all or a portion of the procurement of materials or services pursuant to this RFP and subsequent contract agreement, in the event unforeseen circumstances make such procurement impossible or infeasible, or in the event, City should determine it to be in the best interest of City to cancel such procurement of services or materials.
In the event of termination, selected Proposer will perform such additional work as is necessary for the orderly filing of documents, and closing of project.
The selected Proposer will be compensated for the terminated procurement based on materials or services actually furnished or performed prior to the effective date of termination, plus the work reasonably required for filing and closing.
Notice of Intent to Award:
Approximately two (2) weeks prior to the anticipated City Council meeting awarding a contract because of the RFP, the City will notify all proposer’s of its intent to award. Results will be posted on the City of Torrance Web site https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/47426/portal-home 6 125
RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed BasisRFP No. B2024-15
SECTION II TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
Overview/Introduction:
The purpose of the RFP is to seek qualified firms to perform expedited plan review services of commercial, residential, industrial and structures for verification of compliance with the current adopted California Building Standards Code, City of Torrance Ordinance, and all applicable codes and statues. Services may include providing temporary staff on-site to perform plan review of various building and structure types for compliance with the adopted codes. Firms responding to this RFP should be able to demonstrate that the personnel that they employ possess certifications and/or licenses relevant to the work they are performing. The City’s intent is to minimize response time and improve overall efficiency for our customers. The City may select multiple vendors.
This RFP is intended to be as descriptive as possible. However, Proposers may not take advantage of omissions or oversights in this document. Proposers must supply products and services that meet or exceed the requirements of this RPF. In the event of a dispute over installation or performance, the needs of the City of Torrance will govern.
Scope of Work:
The ideal firms will provide highly qualified licensed design professionals and certified individuals to provide efficient, accurate and timely plan checks services with sufficient staffing to meet the City’s needs. The staff should have previous experience working for cities, be customer-service oriented, and have experience successfully managing multiple tasks, assignments and responsibilities. Firm shall have the capability to conduct electronic plan review.
The selected firm will be required to review all building, energy, and green related documents submitted by private developers, contractors, designers, and owners for construction and reconstruction projects.
• Plans must be checked according to all applicable codes and statutes as well as project Conditions of Approval from other City departments. All plans must be stamped and signed off if they meet all such requirements, and all changes/corrections must be identified and addressed prior to approval.
• All plan review services shall be performed by a licensed design professional (State of California) and certified individuals with extensive experience in plan review. All staff utilized by Consultant shall be appropriately licensed, registered, and certified as required by the State of California and the City to perform each of the specific scopes of work.
• Consultant shall review all plan check applications for accuracy and make all necessary revisions to such items as description, valuation, square footage, type of construction, and use. All plan review correction materials including marked up plans, documents, and plan check correction lists shall be provided in the City desired format to the City representative immediately upon completion of the plan review at no extra charge to City. This process includes pickup and delivery of the submitted plans. 7 126
•
•
Provide plan check status reports and statistical reports upon request of City in the format type requested by the City (paper or electronic). The information requested may include such information as project name, address, description, square footage, and type of construction, type of review(s) performed, hour(s) required per review, reviewer name, reviewer credentials and turnaround time of plan review(s).
Consultant shall be available to attend pre-submittal and design discussion meetings with the permit applicant as requested by the City. These meetings shall be compensated at the rate of one (1) hour of straight-time compensation and do not include travel time.
•
•
•
Ability to provide electronic plan check services.
Maintain one (1) individual as the contact for all communication with the City.
Ability to provide plan review services at the City upon request. Consultant shall provide all necessary materials and resources to assigned personnel sufficient to perform their works.
In order to meet city-established standards, the expected turnaround times for plan review are as follows:
• All projects – 10 business days from date of receiving the drawings.
General Requirements:
• Brief summary of your firm, its capabilities, and its recent experience. Also, describe your demonstrated experience with similar projects and qualification including professional licenses and certifications.
•
•
Qualifications of the consultant and references from cities and/or counties that have contracted for similar services from the consultant. Past experience checking plans for local jurisdictions.
Qualifications of the plans checkers and inspectors who will be providing services. 8 127
RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed BasisRFP No. B2024-15
SECTION III PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
FAILURE TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS IN THIS SECTION MAY INVALIDATE PROPOSAL.
In accordance with your "Request for Proposals (RFP)", the following proposal is submitted to the City of Torrance.
RFP Submitted By:
________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Company
________________________________________________________________________________ Street Address City Zip Code
________________________________________
Telephone Number
_____________________________________
Fax Number
________________________________________
Printed Name/Title
_____________________________________
E-Mail Address
________________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Date
Form of Business Organization: Please indicate the following (check one).
Corporation Partnership Sole Proprietorship Other: ___________________________ Do you have a Parent Company?
Do you have any Subsidiaries?
Business History:
No
No
Yes,
Yes,
___________________________________
(Name of Parent Company)
___________________________________
(Name of Subsidiary Company)
Years in business under your current name and form of business organization? ________ Years If less than three (3) years and your company was in business under a different name, what was that name?
________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ Contact for Additional Information:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company to contact for any additional information:
________________________________________
Printed Name
__________________________________
Title
________________________________________
Telephone
__________________________________
E-Mail Address
9 128
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Payment Terms: The City of Torrance Payment terms are Net 30. The City does not make pre- payments, or pay upon receipt.
Do you offer any discounted invoice terms? _____________________________ Project Start and Completion:
The City requires the project to start as soon as possible from the award of a contract and the project completed as soon as possible. Specific periods that are mutually agreed upon will be established after award of a contract.
Project Manager:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company who will serve as Project Manager for this contract.
_________________________________________ __________________________________ Name Title
_______________________ __________________ ____________________________________ Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
Contract Representative:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company who will be responsible for administering this contract.
____________________________________________
Name
_________________________________
Title
_______________________ __________________ _________________________________ Email AddressTelephone Number Fax Number
10 129
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Sub Contractors:
If awarded, will you be using sub contractors to carry out the scope of work required in this RFP? Yes, we will be using sub contractors and have listed their contact information below.
No, we will not be using any sub contractors for this project. _______________________ __________________ ______________________________ Company Name Contact Name Title
_______________________ __________________
Telephone Number Fax Number
________________________________
Email Address
Please explain the working relationship between your company and the sub contractor. _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 11 130
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects:
In the space below, please provide a narrative explaining your background and recent experience with similar projects as the scope of work identified in this RFP. (Please attach additional sheet if needed.) 12 131
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Work Plan for Each Required Task:
In the space below, please describe in detail the methodology you will be utilizing to conduct for each task. (Please attach additional sheets if needed.)
13 132
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ References:
Please supply the names of companies/agencies for which you recently supplied comparable goods/services as requested in this RFP. A minimum of three (3) references is required; additional references are optional. References from public agencies are preferred. Do not include the City of Torrance as a reference for this RFP.
Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City:
State, Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?1
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City, State Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?2
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City, State Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?3
Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
14 133
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ RFP Submittal Requirement and Acknowledgement
Vendors are required to answer each of the questions listed below. You must indicate below that you have provided this information in your proposal submittal. You must attach additional sheets to your RFP submittal describing in detail the service you are proposing.
RFP Scope of Work Questions Indicate what page in your
proposal you have
answered this question.
Did you include a signed Affidavit Form with your RFP Submittal? Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Did you include proof of a valid State of California Civil, Structural, Geotechnical Engineering License.
Did you include proof of a valid Certified Access Specialist (CASp) certification from California Division of State Architect.
Did you include proof of relevance certifications to perform plan review and inspection?
Did you attach additional sheets to answer the Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects information within this RFP? Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you complete a project proposal as described in the Technical Requirements?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Did you review all addenda, if any, issued by the City? Did you include resumes of no more than three (3) qualified candidates? Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you include References? Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal
Are your Wage Rates (Non-Prevailing) Included? Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Have you included Proposed Alternative Language to City’s Pro Forma Yes No Consulting Services Agreement (if applicable)
Page ___ of our submittal
15 134
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ RFP Submittal Requirement and Acknowledgement Continued Vendors are required to answer each of the questions listed below. You must indicate below that you have provided this information in your proposal submittal. You must attach additional sheets to your RFP submittal describing in detail the service you are proposing.
RFP Scope of Work Questions Indicate what page in your
proposal you have answered
this question.
Did you indicate your price to provide the plans review services as indicated in this RFP?
Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you describe your experience with plan check review? Yes No
Page ___ of our submittal.
16 135
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Price Proposal Cost Breakdown To Provide the Services Required in this RFP Description No. of Hours Labor Cost/hr ($) Cost
$ $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$Total Price Proposal
Price Proposal
In accordance with your "Request for Proposal", the following price proposal is submitted to the City of Torrance. We understand that our price submittal is a not to exceed amount and that if we are selected to enter into negotiations with the City the pricing may be adjusted down unless additional services are requested and pricing will be negotiated and adjusted accordingly.
Category Description
(Vendor must attached a full description for each
category explaining what they are proposing) All services must be itemized. Do not bundle.
Proposal Not to Exceed
Amount by Category Description
Building Plan Check** $
$Total Amount for Project
** This review include energy, green building, accessibility, references and all applicable codes and statues.
17 136
ATTACHMENT 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROPOSER’S AFFIDAVIT
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
____________________________ being first duly sworn deposes and says:
1. That he/she is the ___________________________ of _____________________________ (Title of Office) (Name of Company)
Hereinafter called “proposer”, who has submitted to the City of Torrance a proposal for __________________________________________________________________________ (Title of RFP)
2. That the proposal is genuine; that all statements of fact in the proposal are true;
3. That the proposal was not made in the interest or behalf of any person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation not named or disclosed;
4. That the Proposer did not, directly or indirectly, induce solicit or agree with anyone else to submit a false or sham proposal, to refrain from proposing, or to withdraw his proposal, to raise or fix the proposal price of the Proposer or of anyone else, or to raise or fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the Proposer’s price or the price of anyone else; and did not attempt to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of Torrance, or of any other Proposer, or anyone else interested in the proposed contract;
5. That the Proposer has not in any other manner sought by collusion to secure for itself an advantage over the other Proposer or to induce action prejudicial to the interests of the City of Torrance, or of any other Proposer or of anyone else interested in the proposed contract;
6. That the Proposer has not accepted any proposal from any subcontractor or materialman through any proposal depository, the bylaws, rules or regulations of which prohibit or prevent the Proposer from considering any proposal from any subcontractor or material man, which is not processed through that proposal depository, or which prevent any subcontractor or materialman from proposing to any contractor who does not use the facilities of or accept proposals from or through such proposal depository;
7. That the Proposer did not, directly or indirectly, submit the Proposer’s proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or to any individual or group of individuals, except to the City of Torrance, or to any person or persons who have a partnership or other financial interest with said Proposer in its business.
8. That the Proposer has not been debarred from participation in any State or Federal works project.
Dated this ____ day of ________________, 20_____.
_____________________________________
(Proposer Signature)
_____________________________________
(Title)
18 RFP Document Revised September, 2019
137
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of Date (the “Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF TORRANCE, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and CONSULTANT Name, type of entity (“CONSULTANT”).
RECITALS:
A.
B.
C.
CITY wishes to retain the services of an experienced and qualified CONSULTANT to insert brief description of services.
In order to obtain the desired services, CITY has circulated its Request for Proposal for insert brief title of RFP, RFP No. insert RFP No. (the “RFP”).
CONSULTANT has submitted a Proposal (the “Proposal”) in response to the RFP. In its Proposal CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform those services requested in the RFP. Based upon its review of all proposals submitted in response to the RFP, CITY is willing to award this Agreement to CONSULTANT.
AGREEMENT:
1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT will provide the services and install those materials listed in CONSULTANT’s Proposal submitted in response to the RFP. A copy of the RFP is attached as Exhibit A. A copy of the Proposal is attached as Exhibit B.
CONSULTANT warrants that all work and services set forth in the Proposal will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner.
2. 3.
TERM
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Paragraph 4 below, this Agreement will continue in full force and effect from the Effective Date through .
COMPENSATION
A. CONSULTANT’s Fee.
For services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT will be paid in accordance with the Compensation Schedule set forth in the Proposal; provided, however, that in no event will the total amount of money paid CONSULTANT, for services initially contemplated by this Agreement, exceed the sum of $insert dollar amount (“Agreement Sum”), unless otherwise first approved in writing by CITY.
B. Schedule of Payment.
Provided that CONSULTANT is not in default under the terms of this Agreement, upon presentation of an invoice, CONSULTANT will be paid Document1 1
138
the fees described in Paragraph 3.A. above, according to the Compensation Schedule. Payment will be due within 30 days after the date of the invoice.
4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. Termination by CITY for Convenience.
1. 2.
CITY may, at any time, terminate the Agreement for CITY’s convenience and without cause.
Upon receipt of written notice from CITY of such termination for CITY’s convenience, CONSULTANT will:
a.
b.
cease operations as directed by CITY in the notice;
take actions necessary, or that CITY may direct, for the protection and preservation of the work; and
c. except for work directed to be performed prior to the effective date of termination stated in the notice, terminate all existing subcontracts and purchase orders and enter into no further subcontracts and purchase orders.
3. In case of termination for CITY’s convenience, CONSULTANT will be entitled to receive payment for work executed, together with costs incurred by reason of the termination, along with reasonable overhead and profit on work not executed.
B. Termination for Cause.
1. If either party fails to perform any term, covenant or condition in this Agreement and that failure continues for 15 calendar days after the nondefaulting party gives the defaulting party written notice of the failure to perform, this Agreement may be terminated for cause; provided, however, that if during the notice period the defaulting party has promptly commenced and continues diligent efforts to remedy the default, the defaulting party will have such additional time as is reasonably necessary to remedy the default.
2. In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the default of CONSULTANT, CITY may, at the expense of CONSULTANT
and its surety, complete this Agreement or cause it to be completed. Any check or bond delivered to the CITY in connection with this Agreement, and the money payable thereon, will be forfeited to and remain the property of the CITY. All moneys due CONSULTANT under the terms of this Agreement will be retained by CITY, but the retention will not release CONSULTANT and its surety from liability for the default. Under these circumstances, however, CONSULTANT and its surety will be credited with the amount of money retained, toward any amount by which the cost of Document1 2
139
completion exceeds the Agreement Sum and any amount
authorized for extra services.
3. Termination for cause will not affect or terminate any of the rights of CITY as against CONSULTANT or its surety then existing, or that may thereafter accrue because of the default; this provision is in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the CITY under law.
C. Termination for Breach of Law.
In the event CONSULTANT or any of its officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, subsidiaries or affiliates is convicted (i) of a criminal offense as an incident to obtaining or attempting to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or in the performance of a contract or subcontract; (ii) under state or federal statutes of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that currently, seriously, and directly affects responsibility as a public consultant or CONSULTANT; (iii) under state or federal antitrust statutes arising out of the submission of bids or proposals; or (iv) of violation of Paragraph 19 of this Agreement; or for any other cause CITY determines to be so serious and compelling as to affect CONSULTANT’s responsibility as a public consultant or CONSULTANT, including but not limited to, debarment by another governmental agency, then CITY reserves the unilateral right to terminate this Agreement or to impose such other sanctions (which may include financial sanctions, temporary suspensions or any other condition deemed appropriate short of termination) as it deems proper. CITY will not take action until CONSULTANT has been given notice and an opportunity to present evidence in mitigation.
5. FORCE MAJEURE
If any party fails to perform its obligations because of strikes, lockouts, labor disputes, embargoes, acts of God, inability to obtain labor or materials or reasonable substitutes for labor or materials, governmental restrictions, governmental regulations, governmental control, judicial orders, enemy or hostile governmental action, civil commotion, fire or other casualty, or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the party obligated to perform, then that party’s performance will be excused for a period equal to the period of that cause for failure to perform.
6. RETENTION OF FUNDS
CONSULTANT authorizes CITY to deduct from any amount payable to CONSULTANT (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute or that are necessary to compensate CITY for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by CITY, and all amounts for which CITY may be liable to third parties, by reason of CONSULTANT’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform CONSULTANT’s obligations Document1 3
140
under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by CONSULTANT, or any indebtedness exists that appears to be the basis for a claim of lien, CITY may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of the withholding, an amount sufficient to cover the claim. The failure of CITY to exercise the right to deduct or to withhold will not, however, affect the obligations of CONSULTANT to insure, indemnify, and protect CITY as elsewhere provided in this Agreement.
7. 8.
9. CITY REPRESENTATIVE
City Representative is designated as the “City Representative,” authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work and services specified in this Agreement and to make all decisions in connection with this Agreement. Whenever approval, directions, or other actions are required by CITY under this Agreement, those actions will be taken by the City Representative, unless otherwise stated. The City Manager has the right to designate another City Representative at any time, by providing notice to CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE(S)
The following principal(s) of CONSULTANT are designated as being the principal(s) and representative(s) of CONSULTANT authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified in this Agreement and make all decisions in connection with this Agreement:
Representative 1
Representative 2
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT is, and at all times will remain as to CITY, a wholly independent contractor. Neither CITY nor any of its agents will have control over the conduct of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT’s employees, except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement. CONSULTANT’s agents and employees are not and shall not be considered employees of CITY for any purpose. CONSULTANT may not, at any time or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of CITY. CITY has no duty, obligation, or responsibility to CONSULTANT’s agents or employees under the Affordable Care Act. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for any tax penalties associated with the failure to offer affordable coverage to its agents and employees under the Affordable Care Act and any other liabilities, claims and obligations regarding compliance with the Affordable Care Act with respect to CONSULTANT’s agents and employees. CITY is not responsible and shall not be held liable for CONSULTANT’s failure to comply with CONSULTANT’s duties, obligations, and responsibilities under the Affordable Care Act. CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold CITY harmless for any and all taxes and penalties that may be assessed against CITY as a result of CONSULTANT’s obligations under the Affordable Care Act relating to CONSULTANT’s agents and employees.
Document1 4
141
10. 11.
12. BUSINESS LICENSE
CONSULTANT must obtain a City business license prior to the start of work under this Agreement, unless CONSULTANT is qualified for an exemption.
OTHER LICENSES AND PERMITS
CONSULTANT warrants that it has all professional, contracting and other permits and licenses required to undertake the work contemplated by this Agreement.
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK
By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT (a) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services required under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of the services set forth in this Agreement.
Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that will materially affect the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement, CONSULTANT must immediately inform CITY of that fact and may not proceed except at CONSULTANT’s risk until written instructions are received from CITY.
13. 14.
CARE OF WORK
CONSULTANT must adopt reasonable methods during the term of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and other components to prevent losses or damages, and will be responsible for all damages to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by CITY, except those losses or damages as may be caused by CITY’s own negligence.
CONSULTANT’S ACCOUNTING RECORDS; OTHER PROJECT RECORDS
Records of CONSULTANT’s time pertaining to the project, and records of accounts between CITY and CONSULTANT, will be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis. CONSULTANT will also maintain all other records, including without limitation, specifications, drawings, progress reports and the like, relating to the work and services identified in Exhibit A. All records will be available to CITY during normal working hours. CONSULTANT will maintain these records for three years after final payment.
15. INDEMNIFICATION
CONSULTANT will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Torrance, the City Council, each member thereof, present and future, members of boards and commissions, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively “City Affiliates”) from and against any and all liability, expenses, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damages whatsoever, including, but not limited to, those arising from breach of contract, bodily injury, death, personal injury, property damage, loss of use, or property loss however the same may be caused and regardless of the responsibility for negligence. The obligation to Document1 5
142
indemnify, defend and hold harmless includes, but is not limited to, any liability or expense, including defense costs and legal fees, arising from the negligent acts or omissions, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, subCONSULTANTs or vendors. CONSULTANT’s obligations to indemnify, defend and hold harmless will apply even in the event of concurrent negligence on the part of City Affiliates, except for liability resulting solely from the negligence or willful misconduct of City Affiliates. Payment by CITY is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this indemnity. In the event of any dispute between CONSULTANT and CITY, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence of City Affiliates, CONSULTANT will be obligated to pay for the defense of City Affiliates until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City Affiliates as solely negligent. CONSULTANT will not be entitled in the event of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and costs of litigation.
16. 17.
NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
No officer or employee of CITY will be personally liable to CONSULTANT, in the event of any default or breach by the CITY or for any amount that may become due to CONSULTANT.
INSURANCE
A. CONSULTANT and its subCONSULTANTs must maintain for the duration of the Agreement at their sole expense the following insurance, which will be full coverage not subject to self-insurance provisions:
1. Automobile Liability, including owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, with at least the following limits of liability:
a.
b.
c.
Primary Bodily Injury with limits of at least $500,000 per person, $1,000,000 per occurrence; and
Primary Property Damage of at least $250,000 per
occurrence; or
Combined single limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence.
2. Commercial General Liability including coverage for premises, products and completed operations, independent
CONSULTANTs/vendors, personal injury and contractual
obligations with combined single limits of coverage of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 aggregate.
///
///
Document1 6
143
3. 4.
Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and, if workers' compensation is required, employer's liability insurance with minimum limits of ($1,000,000) per occurrence or occupational illness. The Workers' Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the CITY for all work performed by the CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subconsultants.
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT’S profession, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $4,000,000 aggregate.
B.
C.
The insurance provided by CONSULTANT will be primary and non- contributory.
CITY, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Torrance, the City Council and each member thereof, members of boards and commissions, every officer, agent, official, employee and volunteer must be named as additional insureds under the automobile and general liability policies.
D. CONSULTANT must provide certificates of insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) indicating appropriate coverage, to the City Clerk of the City of Torrance before the commencement of work.
E.
F.
Each insurance policy required by this Paragraph must contain a provision that no termination, cancellation or change of coverage can be made without notice to the CITY.
If the CONSULTANT maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the CONSULTANT. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY.
G.
H.
The procuring of insurance shall not be construed as a limitation on liability nor as full performance of the indemnification provisions of the CONSULTANT.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
a. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
Document1 7
144
c. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Vendor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.
I. CONSULTANT hereby grants to CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
J. Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY.
The CITY may require the CONSULTANT to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY.
18. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURERS
Insurance required by this Agreement will be satisfactory only if issued by companies admitted to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless these requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of CITY (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. In the event the Risk Manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to CITY, the CONSULTANT agrees that the minimum limits of any insurance policies or performance bonds required by this Agreement may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager; provided that CONSULTANT will have the right to appeal a determination of increased coverage by the Risk Manager to the City Council of CITY within 10 days of receipt of notice from the Risk Manager.
19. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
A. No officer or employee of the CITY may have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor may any officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement that affects the officer or employee’s financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which the officer or employee is, directly or indirectly interested, in violation of any law, rule or regulation.
B. No person may offer, give, or agree to give any officer or employee or former officer or employee, nor may any officer or employee solicit, demand, accept, or agree to accept from another person, a gratuity or an offer of employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, preparation or any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the content of any Document1 8
145
specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any way pertaining to any program requirement, contract or subcontract, or to any solicitation or proposal.
20. NOTICE
A. All notices, requests, demands, or other communications under this Agreement will be in writing. Notice will be sufficiently given for all purposes as follows:
1. 2.
Personal delivery. When personally delivered to the recipient, notice is effective on delivery.
First Class mail. When mailed first class to the last address of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective three mail delivery days after deposit in a United States Postal Service office or mailbox.
3. 4.
Certified mail. When mailed certified mail, return receipt requested, notice is effective on receipt, if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt.
Overnight delivery. When delivered by an overnight delivery service, charges prepaid or charged to the sender’s account, notice is effective on delivery, if delivery is confirmed by the delivery service.
5. 6.
Facsimile transmission. When sent by fax to the last fax number of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective on receipt. Any notice given by fax will be deemed received on the next business day if it is received after 5:00 p.m. (recipient’s time) or on a non-business day.
Addresses for purpose of giving notice are as follows:
CONSULTANT:
CITY:
CONSULTANT’S NAME AND
ADDRESS
Fax: INSERT FAX NUMBER
City Clerk
City of Torrance
3031 Torrance Boulevard
Torrance, CA 90503
Fax: (310) 618-2931
B. Any correctly addressed notice that is refused, unclaimed, or undeliverable because of an act or omission of the party to be notified, will be deemed effective as of the first date the notice was refused, unclaimed Document1 9
146
or deemed undeliverable by the postal authorities, messenger or overnight delivery service.
C. Either party may change its address or fax number by giving the other party notice of the change in any manner permitted by this Agreement.
21. 22.
PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement and all exhibits are binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties. The Agreement may not be assigned or subcontracted by either CITY or CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of the other.
INTEGRATION; AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained in it. No prior oral or written understanding will be of any force or effect with respect to the terms of this Agreement. The Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both parties.
23. 24.
INTERPRETATION
The terms of this Agreement should be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and should not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or by any other rule of construction that might otherwise apply. To the extent that the terms of the RFP or Proposal are inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
SEVERABILITY
If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, that part will be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with any applicable laws, but the remainder of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
25. 26.
TIME OF ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
GOVERNING LAW; JURISDICTION
This Agreement will be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Jurisdiction of any litigation arising from the Agreement will be in Los Angeles County, California.
27. 28.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTES AND REGULATIONS
CONSULTANT will be knowledgeable of and will comply with all applicable federal, state, county and city statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances and orders.
WAIVER OF BREACH
No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a nondefaulting party on any default will impair the right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
A party’s consent or approval of any act by the other party requiring the first party’s consent or approval will not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by Document1 10
147
either party of any default must be in writing and will not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
29. ATTORNEY’S FEES
Except as provided for in Paragraph 15, in any dispute, litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding by which one party either seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement (whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing party will be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees, together with any costs and expenses, to resolve the dispute and to enforce any judgment.
30. 31.
EXHIBITS
All exhibits identified in this Agreement are incorporated into the Agreement by this reference.
CONSULTANT’S AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT warrant that (i) CONSULTANT is duly organized and existing; (ii) they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT; (iii) by so executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement; and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which CONSULTANT is bound.
32. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
Any documents submitted by the CONSULTANT; all information obtained in connection with the CITY’s right to audit and inspect the CONSULTANT’s documents, books, and accounting records pursuant to paragraph 14 CONSULTANT’s Accounting Records; Other Project Records; as well as those documents which were required to be submitted in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) used in the solicitation process for this Contract become the exclusive property of the City. All such documents become a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public records. Exceptions will be those elements in the California Government Code Section 7920.000 et seq. (Public Records Act) and which are marked “trade secret”, “confidential”, or “proprietary”.
The CITY shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records including, without limitation, those so marked, if disclosure is required by law, or by an order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. ///
///
///
///
///
///
Document1 11
148
In the event the CITY is required to defend an action on a Public Records Act request for any of the aforementioned documents, information, books, records, and/or contents of a proposal marked “trade secret”, “confidential”, or “proprietary”, the CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify the CITY from all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, in action or liability arising under the Public Records Act.
CITY OF TORRANCE, Firm Name
a municipal corporation Type of Entity
_______________________________
George K. Chen, Mayor
By:________________________________
Signer
Title
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Rebecca Poirier, MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PATRICK Q. SULLIVAN
City Attorney
By: ____________________________
Attachments: Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Request for Proposals
Proposal
Rev. 0424
Document1 12
149
EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
[To be attached]
150
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSAL
[To be attached]
151
EXHIBIT B
M6 CONSULTING, INC.’S PROPOSAL
[To be attached]
152
City of Torrance Page 1 of 1
Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed Basis (B2024-15), bidding on 12/16/2024 12:00 PM (PST) Printed 12/16/2024
EXHIBIT B
PlanetBids
153
154
RFP for Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department on an as Needed BasisRFP No. B2024-15
SECTION III PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
FAILURE TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS IN THIS SECTION MAY INVALIDATE PROPOSAL.
In accordance with your "Request for Proposals (RFP)", the following proposal is submitted to the City of Torrance.
RFP Submitted By:
m6 Consulting Inc.________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Company
893 Patriot Drive Unit E Moorpark 93021________________________________________________________________________________ Street Address City Zip Code
805.379.1015________________________________________
Telephone Number
_____________________________________
Fax Number
Robert Woodward [email protected]________________________________________ Printed Name/Title
_____________________________________
E-Mail Address
12/16/2024_ ______________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Date
Form of Business Organization: Please indicate the following (check one).
Corporation Partnership Sole Proprietorship Other: ___________________________ Do you have a Parent Company?
Do you have any Subsidiaries?
Business History:
No
No
Yes,
Yes,
___________________________________
(Name of Parent Company)
___________________________________
(Name of Subsidiary Company)
11Years in business under your current name and form of business organization? ________ Years If less than three (3) years and your company was in business under a different name, what was that name?
________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ Contact for Additional Information:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company to contact for any additional information:
Robert Woodward Principal Engineer________________________________________ Printed Name
__________________________________
Title
_
8 0
_
5. _
379
_
.1
_
0 1
_
5 __________________________________
Telephone
[email protected] E-Mail Address
2 155
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: _
m
_
6 C
_
on
_
s u
_
ltin
_
g
_
Inc
_
. ____________________________________________________
Payment Terms: The City of Torrance Payment terms are Net 30. The City does not make pre- payments, or pay upon receipt.
Do you offer any discounted invoice terms? _
No
_
t a
_
t t
_
his
_
tim
_
e
_
.
______________________
Project Start and Completion:
The City requires the project to start as soon as possible from the award of a contract and the project completed as soon as possible. Specific periods that are mutually agreed upon will be established after award of a contract.
Project Manager:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company who will serve as Project Manager for this contract.
_________________________________________ __________________________________Nicole Thompson, PE, CPE Senior Plan Review Engineer Name Title
_
8 0
_
5. _
37 _
9.1 _
0 1
_
5 _________________ __________________
_
Ni
_
co
_
le@
_
m
_
6C
_
on
_
su
_
lti
_
ngI
_
nc
_
.co
_
m
_____________________
___
Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
Contract Representative:
Please provide the name of the individual at your company who will be responsible for administering this contract.
____________________________________________ _
Pr
_
inc
_
ipa
_
l E
_
ng
_
in
_
ee
_
rs
_________________________
Title
Masoud Mahmoud and/or Robert Woodward
Name
_
8 0
_
5. _
37 _
9.1 _
0 1
_
5 _________________ __________________
[email protected] and/or [email protected] Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address
3 156
m6 Consulting Inc.Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Sub Contractors:
If awarded, will you be using sub contractors to carry out the scope of work required in this RFP? Yes, we will be using sub contractors and have listed their contact information below.
No, we will not be using any sub contractors for this project.
GeoDynamics, Inc Geotechnical EngineerAli Abdel-Haq, PE, GE_______________________ __________________ ______________________________ Company Name Contact Name Title
805.496.1222 [email protected]_______________________ __________________ ________________________________ Email AddressTelephone Number Fax Number
Please explain the working relationship between your company and the sub contractor. m6 and GeoDynamics Inc have worked together for years for various jurisdictions_________________________________________________________________________________ providing plan review services. m6 teams with GeoDynamics for geotechnical plan review_________________________________________________________________________________ services for in the cities of Calabasas, Moorpark, Santa Paula, Camarillo,_________________________________________________________________________________ and Oxnard. Additionally, Ali and his team has supported with geotechnical plan review_________________________________________________________________________________ services for our higher education clients including various California State University_________________________________________________________________________________ clients along with University of California clients._________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 4 157
Proposal Submittal (continued):
m6 Consulting Inc.Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects:
In the space below, please provide a narrative explaining your background and recent experience with similar projects as the scope of work identified in this RFP. (Please attach additional sheet if needed.) See attached.
5 158
Firm Background and Overview
m6 Consulting, Inc. (m6) is a specialized engineering firm serving municipal, State, and higher education clients. The m6 team is led by the combined talents of Robert
Woodward, PE, CASp, CBO and Masoud Mahmoud, PE,
MS, MBA, LEED AP, and supported by their teams of
knowledgeable and experienced engineers, plan reviewers, inspectors, permit technicians, project managers, and
additional support staff. Both Robert and Masoud have
served as building officials, plan check engineers, inspectors, city engineers, design engineers, and project managers, bringing a diversity of knowledge and experience that is reflected in their company and its employees.
From our company’s beginning, our reputation among
municipalities has been based upon the following cornerstones of practice:
✓ Excellent customer service, provided by knowledgeable and caring professional staff; ✓ Establishing and maintaining rapid plan check turn – around times, then insuring these are regularly met and frequently exceeded;
✓ Employing experienced, skilled and highly qualified staff that are cross – trained in the multiple disciplines of plan check, inspection and counter operations to provide highly effective customer service in a cost – efficient staffing footprint.
✓ Providing dependable and reliable staff with redundancy to support the City.
Our success has largely been established in practice, by assuming service for jurisdictions with plan check and inspection back – logs, process and procedure gaps, and significant customer service issues. Our staff regularly rises to challenges, and truly enjoys improving systems and service to our clients. Key to the delivery of knowledgeable, efficient and effective customer service is individual leadership by a staff with a diversity of experience, and the ability to make timely decisions on a daily basis. We are committed to providing building and safety services to the City, in a manner that meets and exceeds the requests and tasks detailed in the RFP.
m6 is unique as a small firm in a host of multinational companies, simultaneously providing diverse expertise, depth of knowledge and focused service to municipal clients who demand an extraordinary degree of technical capability, code knowledge, and adaptability, coupled with an understanding and responsiveness to constrained schedules and rapid turn – around times. These same clients selected m6 specifically for the review of complex, nuanced projects which were both important to the City, and necessary for the development of specific portions of their community. Our client agencies understand that m6 can speak the languages of development, building codes, and City administrators, and appreciated that necessary development could be accommodated in an efficient and code compliant manner, achieving the goals of development and accomplishing the City’s vision.
P a g e 6
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 159
Experience and Expertise
m6 is a professional organization that caters to small to mid – size jurisdictions in which our team members routinely work with department staff as an extension of the City. Our goal is to function efficiently and effectively in the context of an existing City staffing environment and provide excellent customer service in a compact staff structure. Key to this approach is a diversely skilled team of building and safety professionals who are capable of multi – tasking across the disciplines of permitting, plan check, inspection, engineering and code determinations.
Municipal Clients
City Of Calabasas: (2014 – Current)
Services: Building and Public Works Plan Review, Inspection, Front Counter Support, CIP Engineering Services, Permit Software Integration and Management, CASp Services, CDBG Services, Expedited Solar Review, Forms and Policy Development, OWTS Policy Development and Review, Development Review Committee (DRC) Services, Ordinance Development, Film Permitting, Historic Preservation Services, and LEED Review
Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Luis Molina, Teal Pacyna, Dan Chavin, Jason Reithoffer, Bryan Sanchez, Adrian Montes, Alex Magdaleno Reference: Mr. Sparky Cohen, CBO, Building Official, Community Development Director, City of Calabasas T: 818.224.1721 E: [email protected] In 2014, the City of Calabasas retained m6 to
improve their plan check, project review and
delivery process. The Building and Safety
Division was concerned with a backlogged and
inefficient plan check process, and a lack of
accountability for failure to meet turn – around
times by the previous consultant. The m6 team
developed a transparent plan check tracking
system to clearly define and track turnaround
requirements based on project type, with
financial metrics to assure accountability. The
plan check team seamlessly assumed plan
check duties from the previous consultant and
quickly addressed the plan check backlog,
simultaneously processing several complex multi
– family mixed use developments that had been
languishing in plan check. m6 staff provided
training, implemented process improvements,
CAMBRIA HOTEL BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION
– CITY OF CALABASAS
updated handouts and
informational bulletins
created new
to improve
communication to the public, design
professionals and homeowners. m6 currently
supports the City of Calabasas with their building, PAXTON TOWNHOMES BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION – CITY OF CALABASAS
P a g e 7
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 160
public works, and public improvement project plan review at both the permit (post – entitlement) and Development Review Committee (DRC) levels, to support both the Planning Division and Building and Safety Division in their project review efforts.
During the COVID pandemic, the m6 plan review, permitting and inspection team provided seamless support both on – site and off – site to the City and its Building and Safety Division. Additionally, during this time, the m6 team supported the City with migration from hardcopy plan submittals to electronic submittals and review services. This electronic review deployment was additionally coordinated with and supported by the City’s new permitting software. Prior to m6 being retained by the Building and Safety Division, Robert was providing development review, design and project management services for the City since 2006. Development review includes grading, drainage, life safety and structural plan check of projects from concept through construction for Community Development and Public Works.
In addition to plan review, m6 supports the City with building inspection, staff augmentation, permit counter staffing, code enforcement, project management services, fire damage assessments, and structure inspections. m6 assisted the City with the development and implementation of their expedited solar plan review and permitting program, as well as film permitting, historical resource planning and implementation of a new permit software program.
City of Oxnard (2017 – Current)
Services: Building and Public Works Plan Review, CIP Engineering Services, City Engineering, Project Management, CASp Services, Solar Review, Fire Plan Check, Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Review, Forms and Policy Development, Grant and Funding Application Services Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Zhanna Shin, Justin Le, John Casillas, Bryan Sanchez, Adrian Montes, Gavin Amendola, Alex Magdaleno
Reference: Mr. Jeff Pengilley, P.E. | Community Development Director, City of Oxnard, T: 805.385.8208 E: [email protected]
Mr. Michael L. Wolfe, PE, Director of Public Works, City of Oxnard, T: 805.385.8110 E: [email protected]
In 2022, the City of Oxnard retained m6 to
support the City’s Community Development
Department with Building and Safety plan
review services. The City’s prior plan check
consultant had accumulated a significant back –
log of projects awaiting plan review, including
a series of complex multi – family affordable
housing projects which were at risk of losing
RIVER PARK APARTMENTS
BUILDING AND FIRE PLAN REVIEW – CITY OF OXNARDgrant funding due to delays in excess of 12 weeks.
Similar delays in commercial tenant improvement,
residential additions and accessory dwelling unit projects placed the City’s Building and Safety Division in a difficult customer relations position, necessitating immediate intervention in a focused and professionally directed manner.
P a g e 8
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 161
In this context, m6 successfully took the City’s
building plan reviews, eliminated the back – log
in a matter of months, and was able to cut the
typical review times by 75% to meet the City’s
goal of improved turn – around times, excellent
plan review quality and exceptional customer
service.
Most recently, the City of Oxnard Fire Department
and Public Works Department requested
additional review services and support. m6
currently provides city engineering and project
management, as well as development review
services which include grading, drainage, public right of way/offsite improvement plan check, soils/geology review to the Public Works Department. m6 provides fire plan check for a variety of routine residential and light commercial tenant improvement projects, as well as complex multi – family residential, commercial and industrial occupancies. m6 provides Certified Verified Program Agency (CUPA) reviews for a variety of hazardous chemical containment and distribution facilities, elevated and subsurface storage tanks and structural supports.
The City originally retained m6 in 2017 to assist in project management and design of selected projects for the City’s Department of Public Works. m6 reviewed the priority, timeline, and costs of the existing and proposed Capital Improvement Projects for the 2020 – 2025 fiscal years and provided recommendations for CIP updates. m6 has continued to provide design development, project and program management, grant writing, and reviews of the City’s Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) and 5 – year updates as part of our larger suite of services to the City.
City of Agoura Hills (2019 – Current)
Services: Building Plan Review, Inspection, CIP Engineering Services, Interim Building Official Support, Expedited Solar Review, Forms and Policy Development, Ordinance Development Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Zhanna Shin, Rachel Williams, Jason Reithoffer, Dan Chavin, Adrian Montes, Teal Pacyna
References: Mr. Lukas Quach, PE, Building Official, T. 818.597.7334 E. [email protected] In 2019, m6 was retained by the City of Agoura Hills,
Building and Safety Division to provide plan review and inspection services to support their Community Development Department. m6 provides building, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing plans check at both the permit (post –
entitlement) and Development Review Committee (DRC)
levels, to support both the Planning Division and Building and Safety Division in the project review efforts. In the recent past, m6 has provided interim building official services, P a g e 9
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 162
code enforcement and related inter – departmental communication and coordination. To support the City’s plan check and permitting functions, a designated m6 liaison provides over the counter plan review services twice a week as well as weekly meetings with applicants and City staff. m6 supports the City with complete building inspection services to assure the details and intent of their approved plans are correctly executed in field construction. m6 assisted the City with the development and implementation of their expedited solar program, providing solar plan review and inspection for residential and commercial photovoltaic systems over and under 10 kW systems.
City of Thousand Oaks (2023 – Current)
Services: As – needed building Plan Review, Building Inspection and Consulting Services Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Luis Molina, Teal Pacyna, Jason Reithoffer, Adrian Montez, Gavin Almendola
Reference: Mr. Teo Francu, SE, AICP, Building Official, City of Thousand Oaks T: 805.449.2309 E:
[email protected]
m6 was retained by the City of Thousand Oaks to provide professional building consultant services. The m6 team provides plan review, building inspection, CASp assessment and inspection, building permit issuance, plan check activities and operations within the Community Development Department. Plans, specifications and associated reports are reviewed and once in construction inspected to ensure compliance with federal, state, and municipal (Thousand Oaks Municipal Code) building, housing, and zoning codes, ordinances, and regulations. m6 has successfully maintained requested review turn – around times and maintained the City’s electronic plan review system City of Manhattan Beach (2024 – Current)
Services: As-Needed Building Plan Review and Building Inspection Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Zhanna Shin, Luis Molina, Alex Magdaleno, Teal Pacyna, Jason Reithoffer
m6 was recently retained by the City of Manhattan Beach to provide building plan review services of construction documents, structural design calculations, and all other supplemental documents, as well as for fire protection system plans and design calculations. All reviews are completed electronically using Bluebeam Studio Sessions and results are to be directly uploaded into the City's electronic permitting software, Enterprise Permitting & Licensing, (EPL). In addition, m6 provides on – call inspection services for building construction sites, building plans, structural plans, and material specifications for structures proposed for construction in the City. The m6 inspection team augments City staff, on an as-needed basis to ensure the building construction sites are inspected within acceptable timeframes, per City standards.
P a g e 10
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 163
City of La Cañada Flintridge
Services: Building Plan Review, Inspection, Front Counter Support, CASp Services, Expedited Solar Review, Forms and Policy Development, and Development Review Committee (DRC) Services.
Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Luis Molina, Bryan Sanchez, Teal Pacyna, Jason Reithoffer, Chris Oxford
Reference: Ms. Susan Koleda, AICP, Director of Community Development, City of La Cañada Flintridge T:
818.790.8881 E: [email protected]
m6 was recently retained by the City of La Cañada Flintridge to provide complete building department services. m6 supports the City by providing building, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, grading and drainage, and geotechnical plan check at both the permit (post – entitlement) and Development Review Committee (DRC) levels, to support both the Planning Division and Building and Safety Division in project review, permitting and associated inspection efforts.
City of Moorpark (2020 – Current)
Services: Public Works Plan Review, Inspection, CIP Engineering Services Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Nicole Thompson, Adrian Montes, Rachel Williams, Tom Greer
References: Mr. Daniel Kim, PE, City Engineer, City of Moorpark T: 805.517.6255, E: [email protected]
Ms. Jessica Sandifer, Community Services Manager, City of Moorpark, T: 805.517.6225 E: [email protected]
In 2020, the City of Moorpark retained m6 to provide
municipal engineering, inspection, project
management, and development review services. m6
provides development review, including grading,
drainage, public right of way/offsite improvement plan
check, soils/geology review, as well as the review of
subdivision map instruments for conformance with the
Subdivision Map Act. m6 provides land development
inspection services and capital project support (peer
review and constructability analysis) to the City’s Public Works Department. m6 also provides landscape
review services to the Community Development
Department for new development projects in the City.
Landscape and irrigation plans are reviewed for
VENDRA GARDENS PUBLIC WORKS PLAN REVIEW –
CITY OF MOORPARK
compliance with the City’s Landscape Standards and Guidelines, conditions of approval, municipal code requirements, specific plans, and Ventura County Fire Department fuel modification requirements for projects located within High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. m6 supports the City by attending regular and special City Council and Planning Commission meetings and meetings with City staff, public officials, community P a g e 11
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 164
leaders, developers, contractors, and the general public to provide engineering support and recommendations.
City of Santa Paula (2020 – Current)
Services: Building and Public Works Plan Review, Inspection, Front Counter Support, CIP Engineering Services, CASp Services, Forms and Policy Development, Floodplain Management, Training, Interim Building Official Services, Interim City Engineer
Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Justin Le, Adrian Montes, Rachel Williams, Tom Greer References: Mr. James Mason, Community Development Director, City of Santa Paula, T:
805.933.4214, E: [email protected]
Since 2020, m6 has provided City Engineer,
Permit Engineer, and Land Development Review
Services to the City’s Public Works Department. In
2022, m6 was asked to provide building
inspection and interim building official services to
support the City’s Community Development
Department, Building and Safety Division. m6
provided these services to the Department through
their transition period, in addition to their regular
City Engineering and development review
responsibilities for grading and drainage, water
and sewer system review, floodplain review and
determinations, map checks, inspection services, geology and soils engineering review, assessment engineering, encroachment permitting, and encroachment inspections.
City of Westlake Village
Services: Community Development Support Services, CIP Engineering Services, Permit Software Integration and Management, Forms and Policy Development
Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Teal Pacyna Reference: Mr. Michael D. Forbes, AICP, Planning Director, City of Westlake Village, Phone:
818.706.1613 Email: [email protected]
The City of Westlake Village recently requested m6 to support the City as they consider transitioning from a current contract with the County of Los Angeles for building and safety plan check, inspection and permitting services and creating a full – service, in – house, Building and Safety Division within the City. m6 developed a transition plan for the City which identifies elements of staffing, financial feasibility, building file transfer and management, permit system development, and continuity of customer service associated with the assumption of plan check, inspection, permitting services. The relatively small size of the City and associated financial considerations will encourage the development of a ‘virtual’ building division and P a g e 12
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 165
associated permitting system that will allow for streamlined permit application, plan check tracking, and records management with minimal cost and maximized usability and customer service functionality.
Educational Clients
California State University (CSU) System (2016 – Current) Services: Title 24 Plan Review, Grading and Drainage Review, CASp Services, Forms and Policy Development, Training
Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Zhanna Shin, Rachel Williams, Teal Pacyna, Luis Molina, Bryan Sanchez, Adrian Montes, Lauren Gallardo
Reference: Mr. Jack Andersen, Chief, Planning and Design, California State University Office of the Chancellor T: 562.951.4120, E: [email protected]
The Chancellor's Office of the CSU system retained
m6 in 2016 to provide plan review services for their
23 campuses, as well as to improve their plan check
and development review processes. Currently, m6
provides complete fire – life safety and grading &
drainage plan review services. The CSU retained m6
for their diversity of capabilities and their ability to review complex projects proposed for existing built
campus environments. An initial concern identified by
the CSU Chancellor’s Office was a historic pattern of
major code issues not identified early enough in th
project development process. This resulted in often
extensive re – design of facilities at an advanced
stage of design, causing significant project delays
and associated impacts to budgets and schedules.
m6 had developed a preliminary code review
procedure with its municipal clients, and this model
was embraced by the CSU system following m6’s
commencement of plan review services. The
preliminary code review process provides for a
planning level review of critical components and
early review of code requirements in the project
development process to identify significant issues UNIVERSITY GLEN HOUSING PLAN REVIEW– CSU, CHANNEL ISLANDSrelated to type of construction, allowable area/height, occupancy and exiting, and other major fire – life safety items. This process affirms and refines the project’s design at a point in the process where necessary changes are more easily managed and allows for more accurate forecasting of project schedules and budgets. This process has been successful with the CSU system and has allowed for improved project delivery during a time of particularly large and complex projects across all the CSU campuses. This early review incorporated external agency review with the P a g e 13
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 166
Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) to allow comment and achieve buy – in from this agency. m6’s process development in this regard led to training with the CSU Chancellor’s Office and OSFM, in which individual campuses and their project managers were educated in the interagency review process, as well as provided tools for successful navigation of both the building code review and early plan check process.
University of California System (2019 – Current)
Services: Title 24 Plan Review, Grading and Drainage Review, Accessibility Review Service Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Rachel Williams, Zhanna Shin, Teal Pacyna, Luis Molina
Reference: Mr. Paul R. Menard, AIA, CBO, Building Official, University of California Davis Health, T: 916.734.7146, E: [email protected]
Mr. Ed Schmittgen NCARB CBO, Associate Director & Building Official, University of California, Santa Barbara T: 805.451.1186, E: [email protected]
m6 has been retained by the University of California
Davis Health, Santa Barbara, Berkeley, Riverside, and
Merced campus for plan review services. m6 provides
code consulting services, development review, as well as fire and life safety plan review services. Services under this contract include coordination with the Designated
Campus Fire Marshal (DCFM) and CBO, review of
architectural plans, specifications, smoke control system, deferred submittals, and fire protection systems, and
preparation and/or review of engineering judgements
on fire life safety issues and alternative methods of
construction documentation. For the UCDH campus, m6
provides weekly virtual over the counter plan review
services. Plans are submitted for preview the day before and designers are provided with comments in a virtual
platform to eliminate any lead times for smaller projects.
AGGIE SQUARE MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL – UC, DAVIS
HEALTH
P a g e 14
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 167
State Clients
Judicial Council of California (2022 – Current)
Services: Title 24, Civil, and Fire Plan Review
Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Rachel Williams, Zhanna Shin, Teal Pacyna, Luis Molina, Alex Magdaleno, Lauren Gallardo
Reference: Ms. Deepika Padam, Manager Quality Compliance, Judicial Council of California, T:
415.865.4047 E: [email protected]
In 2022, the Judicial Council of California retained m6 to provide third party plan review services for their facilities state – wide which includes over 400 facilities. m6 provides review of design drawings and specifications, and delegated design and deferred submittals, for conformance with applicable building codes, regulations, and Judicial Council standards. m6 reviews these facilities as well as their capital projects, facility modifications, infrastructure upgrades, and repair projects.
Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM):
Key Staffing: Robert Woodward, Masoud Mahmoud, Nicole Thompson, Rachel Williams, Zhanna Shin, Teal Pacyna, Luis Molina, Gavin Almendola Services: Fire and Life Safety Plan Review
Reference: Mr. Steve C. Guarino, Former Fire Chief, Office of the State Fire Marshal T: 916-734-1223, E: [email protected]
OSFM retained m6 to provide fire and life safety review for the diverse range of State – owned buildings and facilities under their jurisdiction. These facilities include universities and colleges, State office buildings, courthouses, prisons, camps, fairgrounds, hospitals, State Parks, tunnels, power plants, facility improvements for Caltrans, Departments of Health, General Services, Fish and Game and flood control facilities. m6 is one of a handful of HIGH RISE COURTHOUSE FIRE LIFE SAFETY PLAN companies in the United States that provides simultaneous plan review REVIEW – OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL capability and expertise to both the State Chancellor’s Office and State Fire Marshal on some of their most challenging projects. The following are a few facilities that m6 has reviewed for OSFM projects:
•
•
•
•
•
California Medical Center
Metropolitan State Hospital
Coalinga State Hospital
Claybank Detention Facility
Roundtree Medium Security
•
•
•
Central California Woman’s Facility
South County Detention Facility
Wasco State Prison
P a g e 15
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 168
Key Personnel
m6 has assembled a team of highly qualified professionals with diverse talents in plan review, inspection and permitting services. This core of licensed and certified professionals forms a uniquely talented team that brings a deep level of knowledge and expertise to the City of Torrance. The team has worked together for years and represents a focused expertise that is highlighted below.
Robert Woodward, PE, CASp
Position: Principal Engineer and Building Services Supervisor Robert brings 30 years of building construction, inspection, plan review, and municipal engineering to his role as project manager and building services supervisor. Robert has provided plan check, development review, inspection, design, project management, and city engineering services for multiple jurisdictions including the Cities of Calabasas, Santa Paula, Moorpark, Hermosa Beach, Goleta, Oxnard, Westlake Village, Agoura Hills, and West Hollywood, as well as the 23 campuses of the California State University (CSU) System, the Office of the State Fire Marshal, Marin County Community College District, and the University of California Santa Barbara, Riverside and Davis Health campuses.
Development review includes grading, drainage, accessibility, life safety and structural plan check of projects from concept through construction for Community Development and Public Works Departments.
Masoud Mahmoud, PE, MS, MBA, LEED AP, CPE
Position: Principal Engineer and Project Director
Masoud brings 30 years of local agency engineering, plan review and leadership, as well as management of large educational and Public Works development projects to his role as principal engineer. Masoud has a significant depth of experience in working with various Counties, Coastal Commission, Water Districts, Fire Departments, and Flood Control Districts on high profile projects. As a Civil Engineer with the Los Angeles County, Department of Public Works for 12 years, Masoud brings a unique experience to our team relative to the inner workings of governmental entities as well as complex responsibilities for horizontal and vertical infrastructure design, construction, operations and maintenance.
During his tenure with the Building and Safety Division, he supervised, inspected and processed plan checks, trained and supervised plan check engineers, initiated educational programs that included code interpretation guidelines, and maintained relationships with agencies and administrative authorities of the County, Cities and State. He has served multiple jurisdictions as Interim Building Official, providing inter – departmental leadership and coordination of plan check, inspection and code enforcement functions.
Masoud will provide management of the m6 team, coordinate reviews and maintain accountability for turn – around times.
Nicole Thompson, PE, MS, CFM, CPE
Position: Senior Plan Check Engineer
Nicole will serve as the Senior Plan Check Engineer for the City of Torrance, performing plan review for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional projects for code compliance as assigned to m6.
Nicole is a diversely experienced engineer who provides building, land development and fire/life safety plan review services for multiple jurisdictions, as well as the Office of the State Fire Marshal and the CSU campuses. Development review includes review of grading, drainage, shoring, utilities, disabled access, and off – site infrastructure while fire and life safety review is inclusive of fire – life safety, structural building components, fire access, circulation, and the hydraulic design of site piping and suppression systems.
P a g e 16
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 169
Her knowledge and experience ranges from civil and structural design to project management to building architectural and MEP systems review, making her a valuable resource on diverse projects. Nicole provides civil and structural design and project/construction management services for Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) for bridges, parks, transit and municipal facilities for multiple agencies. Nicole also supports municipal clients with funding assistance, grant writing and grant management services including the development and implementation of funding applications.
Zhanna Shin, CASp, MS, CPE
Position: Senior Plan Check Engineer
Zhanna will serve as a Senior Plan Check Engineer and redundancy to Nicole in her absence for the City of Torrance. She has a diverse background in plan review for a range of project types, from residential additions and remodels to complex commercial and industrial projects. Zhanna serves as the point of contact for the City of Agoura Hills, providing over – the – counter plan review, in – person meetings to inform the public the understanding of City’s plan check and permit process and encourage accurate and complete submittals. She serves as a lead plan check engineer for the CSU system, providing structural, life safety and disabled access review for a variety of campus buildings and facilities across 18 of the 23 CSU campuses Statewide.
Luis Molina, PE, MS, CFM, CPE
Position: Senior Plan Check Engineer
Luis will serve as a specialty Senior Plan Check Engineer for the City of Torrance. His background includes serving as a lead plan check engineer for smaller jurisdictions, and he is diversely talented in architectural, structural, OWTS, MEP and grading and drainage reviews for a wide range of structures, from simple additions and remodels to complex residential, commercial and mixed – use projects. His experience in providing plan reviews for larger jurisdictions, universities, and community colleges affords him the ability to bring sophisticated plan check knowledge and skill to the City of Torrance and their projects. Luis brings 6 years of design and review experience to his role as development reviewer. Luis will serve as the designated client liaison and lead reviewer for the City, and is supported by fellow plan check engineers, listed below, for both redundancy and capacity.
Rachel Williams, PE, CPE, QSP
Position: Specialty Plan Check Engineer
Rachel will serve as a specialty Plan Check Engineer for the City of Torrance, providing focused support for Nicole and Zhanna in their lead review role. Her background in reviewing complex fire – life – safety, mechanical, electrical and structural systems for sophisticated educational, health care and municipal clients renders her well qualified in her supporting technical role for the City’s plan check process. She serves as the m6 liaison for development review of the University of California, Santa Barbara, Riverside, Merced, and University of Davis Health campus as well as Judicial Council of California projects State – Wide. She has capabilities to perform an all – inclusive review with her experience in building architectural and structural design to mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and civil design.
P a g e 17
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 170
Edward "Ed" Alexanians, PE, SE
Position: Senior Plan Check Engineer
Edward brings more than 40 years of engineering experience to his role as senior plan check engineer, with 27 years of plan checking for the County of Los Angeles, including the management of its District plan check operations. His review experience includes high and mid-rise buildings, commercial and multi- family occupancies, podium buildings and bridges. Edward’s combination of depth of detailed design knowledge, coupled with experience in administration of plan check operations, makes Ed a powerful resource to the City of Torrance.
Justin Le, CFM, CPE
Position: Plan Check Engineer
Justin performs building design and land development plan review for residential, commercial, industrial and infrastructure projects. His knowledge and experience ranges from architectural, accessibility, fire life safety, structural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems to public and private developments encompassing streets, sewers, grading and drainage. His diverse experience in vertical building structures, fire life-safety, grading, drainage and site reviews allows him to provide comprehensive reviews accurately and effectively for a range of complex projects. He serves as lead land development reviewer for the City of Santa Paula as well as the City of Oxnard’s Fire Department and Community Development Department (Building and Safety Division).
Teal Pacyna CEI, CEPE, CPT
Position: Community Development Specialist/Electrical and Solar System Reviewer Teal serves in diverse roles in electrical plan check, permitting and permit systems support, electrical infrastructure management, planning, and code analysis. She is an ICC certified electrical plans examiner and inspector, and leads the electrical and solar plan review team, coordinating engineering, plan review, planning and permit center activities. Teal also serves the municipal permitting team, providing film permitting, front counter support, training, coordination and implementation of policies, procedures and soft-ware deployment. She assists the Planning Division with special projects and is working as the Historic Preservation liaison in the City of Calabasas. Her past experience in overhead utility design and relocation, Caltrans coordination and water system design and coordination makes her a well-rounded member of the m6 municipal team.
Christopher Oxford, CBI, CPE
Position: Certified Building Inspector, Plans Examiner
Christopher is a diversely talented member of the m6 plan check and inspection team. He started his career as a permit specialist, with cross – training in both plan check and field inspection for residential, commercial tenant improvements, and grading, drainage and utilities associated with land development projects. He additionally has experience supporting the municipalities with a variety of services including CDBG inspection and case management. Christopher’s diverse range of capabilities make him a valuable resource for the City.
P a g e 18
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 171
Adrian Montes, EIT
Position: Assistant Civil Engineer, Permit Engineer, Encroachment Inspection Adrian performs encroachment permit review and inspection and building design plan review for residential, commercial, industrial and infrastructure projects. Adrian provides project engineering functions for municipal clients. His knowledge and experience ranges from public and private developments encompassing, grading, drainage, SWPPP’s, LID BMP’s, hydrology and hydraulic reports, erosion control, street improvement, water improvement, sewer improvement, and right – of – way improvement for commercial, residential, and City projects. He provides plan reviews for the City of Santa Paula, Calabasas, and Oxnard, as well as State – owned buildings and facilities for the California State University System for compliance with Title 24, Title 19, and NFPA Standards. He has the capabilities to perform an all – inclusive review with his experience in building architectural, structural, MEP and civil grading and drainage review.
Jimmy Todorov, PE
Position: Senior Civil Engineer
Jimmy has 25 years of experience in a wide range of civil engineering projects. He has extensive expertise in the design and review of infrastructure, grading, and mass transit civil projects, working closely with the City of Los Angeles on various City and Metro projects throughout his career. His blended knowledge of review, coordination and approval of grading, drainage, roadway, and transit projects in complex- built environments provides the City a valuable asset in the successful execution of site work reviews associated with complex development proposals.
Nader Shams, PE (Electrical)
Position: Electrical Engineer/Plan Reviewer
Nader has 32 years of experience in design and review, including 8 years as senior engineer and chief inspector at the County of Los Angeles. Nader’s review and inspection work has included both essential facilities, such as police and fire stations, as well as complex facilities including the Disney Concert Hall, LA/USC Medical Center, and Universal Studios. As the head of electrical plan check section, he is responsible for plan checking, interpreting building code requirements and supervising plan check engineers and electrical inspection services.
Kaveh Razavi, PE (Mechanical)
Position: Mechanical Engineer/Plan Reviewer
Kaveh brings over 30 years of experience in review and design of mechanical and plumbing systems for both public and private sector. Kaveh reviews plans and design calculations for public and private construction of commercial, residential, and industrial facilities, including parking garage and atria ventilation and smoke control systems. As the head of the mechanical plan check section for County of Los Angeles, he was responsible for plan checking, interpreting building code requirements and supervising plan check engineers and mechanical inspection services.
Farhad Zaltash, PE
Position: Senior Traffic Engineer
Farhad is a senior member of the m6 Consulting team, with a total of 32 years in the field of traffic engineering and transportation planning, 28 years with Los Angeles Department of Transportation P a g e 19
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 172
(LADOT), and 4 years with Caltrans District 7. He has served in a managerial role for 23 years of his total career, overseeing a wide range of major transportation projects. He has been the recipient of four work-related recognition awards in traffic-engineering and transportation-planning fields in Los Angeles area, three awarded by the Los Angeles City Council members and one awarded by the Los Angeles Board of Public Works Commissioners.
Ali Abdel-Haq PE, GE
Position: Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Ali brings over 33 years of professional experience in geotechnical engineering in the State of California and has been providing geotechnical engineering review services for various projects for the cities of Simi Valley, Calabasas, Camarillo, Agoura Hills, Palmdale, Santa Clarita, Rosemead, Moorpark, Hidden Hills, Santa Paula, Malibu, and the County of Santa Barbara. His project experience includes field explorations, laboratory testing, engineering analyses including slope stability analyses, and construction observations, of various types of projects including hillside land development, commercial and industrial buildings, landslides, theme parks, schools, water tanks, airport facilities, wastewater treatment plants, transmission and distribution lines, and power generator facilities.
Dan Chavin, CBI, CPE
Position: Certified Plans Examiner and Senior Inspector Dan brings more than 36 years of building inspection, plan check, and construction experience to the m6 team. His blend of diverse construction experience, coupled with detailed knowledge of the building codes and their application makes him a valuable resource for plan review, training, and communication with designers, contractors and members of the public. Dan has served as building official in multiple jurisdictions, and currently provides supervision, leadership and specialized inspection in support of these municipalities.
Jason Reithoffer, CBI
Position: Senior Inspector and Plumbing/Mechanical Reviewer Jason has more than 30 years of plumbing, mechanical, electrical and building inspection and trade experience. His knowledge of construction practice and tradecraft, as well as code application experience provides for a practical approach to understanding site conditions and applying code requirements. Jason’s 20 years of building and MEP inspection experience with public agencies, as well as experience supporting both MEP plan check and public counter functions, make him a uniquely powerful asset for the City.
John Casillas, CBI
Position: Certified Building Inspector
John brings experience and expertise from his background in construction and site management, serving as a construction contractor, then a superintendent for commercial and residential projects in southern California. His knowledge and experience in building and site work He performs building inspection for residential, commercial and industrial projects, as well as grading, drainage, sitework and encroachment permit inspections for multiple municipalities.
P a g e 20
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 173
Tom Greer
Position: Senior Public Works Inspector
Tom has 35 years of professional experience in the construction and Public Works industry. He has 13 years as a Public Works inspector for the City of Thousand Oaks. As a senior inspector with m6, he oversees the inspection assignments for the City of Moorpark and Santa Paula. His vast inspection, construction, and supervisory knowledge and experiences makes him a valuable resource for the City.
He also has experience in plan review and assisting with plan check approvals for all occupancy and project types as well as mentoring and training of engineers and inspectors.
P a g e 21
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 174
TEAM ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
The team’s organizational structure and leadership are illustrated in the subsequent Organization Chart City of Torrance
Masoud Mahmoud, PE, LEED AP
Project Director
Robert Woodward, PE, CBO, CASp
Plan Review Supervisor
Plan Review
Inspection
Nicole Thompson, PE, CPE
Liaison and Lead Reviewer
Dan Chavin, CPE, CBI
Senior Building Inspector
Zhanna Shin, CASp, CPE
Luis Molina, MS, CPE
Jason Reithoffer, CBI
John Casillas, CBI
Rachel Williams, PE, CPE
Justin Le, CFM, CPE
Teal Pacyna, CEI, CPT
Edward Alexanians, PE, SE
Kaveh Razavi, PE
Chris Oxford, CBI, CPE
Joseph Munoz, CBI
Tom Greer, PWI
Nader Shams, PE
Adrian Montes Engineering Support Team
Jimmy Todorov, PE
Farhad Zaltash, PE, TE
Ali Abdel-Haq PE, GE
Bryan Sanchez
Gavin Amendola
Alex Magdaleno
P a g e 22
Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 175
Proposal Submittal (continued):
m6 Consulting Inc.Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Work Plan for Each Required Task:
In the space below, please describe in detail the methodology you will be utilizing to conduct for each task. (Please attach additional sheets if needed.)
See attached.
23 176
Approach To Scope of Work
In accordance with the requirements of the request for proposals, we confirm our ability to perform all the requested Scope of Services as described below. We offer the following approach for the delivery of the as-needed Expedited Plan Check Services for the Community Development Department. m6, with its blend of municipal and university experience and expertise, combined with its capabilities to complete innovative and cost – effective plan check efforts, is uniquely qualified to provide a comprehensive suite of plan check and related services to the City of Torrance. m6 will provide full – service plan review capabilities to the City. As requested by the City, we can provide as – needed, on and off – site support for plan check and engineering services. In an age of electronic documentation and information exchange, we will provide electronic plan review, documentation, and transfer of completed approved projects to the City of Torrance.
Plan Review Services
✓ m6 will review architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, drainage, and grading plans, calculations, reports and specifications for compliance with the most recently adopted state and local codes and ordinances as well as project Conditions of Approval from other City departments.
P a g e 24
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 177
✓ All plan check services will be performed by or under the responsible charge of a California licensed professional eligible to prepare and sign such plans. ✓ Plan review corrections lists shall be completed in an approved format, shall be specific, detailed, complete, and reference plan sheet numbers and code sections where applicable and submitted in a City approved format.
✓ All plans will be stamped and signed off once all code compliance issues are resolved to the best of m6’s knowledge and all permit issuance requirements of the City Building and Safety Division are satisfied. m6 will coordinate with the City if there are questions or other arrangements are requested.
✓ m6 will designate one individual as the responsible contact for all communications between the City and m6.
✓ m6 will be available to attend pre – submittal and design discussion meetings with the permit applicant as requested by the City.
✓ m6 has the ability to provide on – site plan review services at the City’s request in conjunction with their regular pattern of plan check functions for the City. m6 will furnish assigned personnel with all necessary materials, resources and training to conduct plan review, including a current copy of applicable City Codes and amendments, policies, and procedures. ✓ All plans and materials will be made available electronically. m6 staff are proficient at a variety of permit software platforms, and routinely assist their clients with related software transitions.
With these proficiencies, m6 staff will adapt to any electronic work – flow and related software used by the City of Torrance.
✓ m6 will provide plan check status reports and statistical reports upon request of City in the format type requested by the City (paper or electronic). The information reported may include information such as project name, address, description, square footage, and type of construction, type of review(s) performed, hour(s) required per review, reviewer name, reviewer credentials and turnaround time of plan review(s).
✓ m6 will complete plan reviews with a maximum 10 business days turn – around time from date of receiving the review documents.
Review services for architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, energy, accessibility, grading, drainage and green building plans will be provided by ICC – certified plans examiners and registered engineers for the City. The electronic review will address code compliance of specific submittal package components, as well as the completeness and correctness of construction documents, specifications, design calculations, and reports. m6 will provide a recommendation for approval and electronically stamp the approved plans when the plan review process is completed, and plans are approvable. Plan check approvals shall be provided once all code compliance issues are resolved, and permit issuance requirements of the City have been satisfied.
When required by the City, m6 can provide accelerated reviews to accommodate fast – paced schedules for specific projects and special circumstances when requested by the applicant and approved by the City. It is worth noting that the regular expedited plan review turn-around times are those observed by m6 for typical plan review processes in many jurisdictions and are entirely normal and reasonable for our proposed scope of services to the City.
P a g e 25
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 178
Permit Application Reviews
Submitted plans are accompanied by a permit application describing the scope of anticipated improvements, additions and modifications. These applications must be reviewed carefully, in close coordination with Permit Center staff. Reviews of additions and alterations frequently begin with a file review of the existing structure and its current approvals and permits by City staff, followed by a detailed review of submitted project documentation. A frequent issue in residential and commercial addition and alteration projects for existing buildings are errors of omission and vagueness in scoping that can lead to permit scoping oversights that translate to field issues during construction. m6 staff are proficient in rapid screening and project assessment to ensure appropriate scope elements are provided, valuation verified and required agency coordination identified. These proficiencies have been honed over many years in a multitude of jurisdictions and allow for a complete and comprehensive determination of project completeness that reduces applicant consternation, improves permit detail and value to the City, and provides excellence in customer service.
Architectural Review:
Architectural designs must address limitations of available lots and compliance with strict Planning guidelines, which results in challenging architectural design solutions. Architectural design is influenced by Planning Division requirements, code considerations, and site limitations, as well as the owners' expectations. Open floor plans and large day – lighting provisions in turn influence complex structural solutions which must in turn be coordinated with the architectural plans and details to assure a complete, code-compliant and constructible construction drawing permit package. Our review staff frequently conducts preliminary design reviews and associated meetings with applicants and their architects to discuss feasibility level building and site design details to address significant components of project development at a time when changes are more efficiently made to a project’s design. These types of meetings are useful as they allow reviewer input in the building planning process, which in turn informs the design decision making process in a manner that produces building designs that proceed smoothly through the plan check and permitting process.
Structural Review:
The combination of difficult site and soil characteristics, sophisticated architecture and planning requirements and owner expectations often lead to complex structural designs in new and existing buildings. These designs require careful and detailed review for errors of commission, as well as visualizing and articulating errors of omission. Luis Molina, PE, MS will lead the m6 structural team with wide-ranging structural review experience. His background includes structural review of an extraordinary range of projects, from simple SFD alterations to complex multi-family mixed use projects, high occupancy projects with complex construction, exiting and smoke control conditions, medical and parking structure facilities, and bridges. This diversity of experience ensures that both the technical review of plans and structural calculations can be completed completely, efficiently and thoroughly, with sophisticated communicated communication style borne of years of diverse experience, ensuring clarity of communication to designers and property owners alike.
Luis is additionally supported by licensed professional engineers Robert, Masoud, Nicole, Rachel and Ed, whose extensive experience in some of the States most structurally complex developments has earned them renown amongst some of the most discerning municipal and higher education clientele. Their P a g e 26
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 179
expertise is derived from a dynamic blend of innovative and cutting-edge code application knowledge, combined with decades of experience residing in a seasoned staff steeped in over a dozen code cycles of structural building code provision development. Lessons learned from many years of earthquake engineering knowledge enhanced by post-earthquake disaster recovery and related code evolution experience in, lateral force resisting systems, frames and their integration with foundation elements guides a dynamic structural plan review team in their service to the City.
Disabled Access Review:
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the State of California's Disabled Access provisions for commercial, multi – family housing and site accessibility provides both a civil rights and code compliance framework for building owners and designers. Additions, alterations, and changes of use in existing buildings will trigger accessibility requirements, the code framework of which must be correctly navigated according to project scope and valuation, and then integrated into a project's plans and scope. In hillside development and existing built environments, providing an accessible site and related connections between site buildings, arrival points and public right of way can be challenging. Our CASp certified staff provides both plan reviews for submitted projects, as well as construction verification inspections when requested by the City for various phases of construction. Navigating dimensional tolerances of disabled access regulations with variables of construction finish thicknesses, floor slopes, and unique types of common plumbing fixtures can be challenging in practice, and inspection of projects for disabled access (CASp) compliance during the framing stage can save considerable rework due to errors in final inspection. In the post – COVID environment, many cities are finding ways to formalize ‘temporary’ accommodations within public right of way for accessibility, including outdoor dining facilities. m6 has assisted cities with formalizing and permitting such facilities, providing CASp inspections and related reports and documentation to various restaurants and other businesses desiring to continue with their expanded functions. The m6 team has CASp – certified staff that are experienced in performing disabled access compliance reviews and inspections and are well versed in the nuances of code application in specific conditions.
Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Review:
The evolving world of energy design, green building and renewable design has led to challenges in the development of electrical, plumbing, and mechanical design. Balancing energy distribution with conservation in a safe, code compliant and efficient manner requires often sophisticated design and diligent review. Similar challenges in water conservation, reuse and indoor air quality require knowledgeable plan review staff with both private sector design and public sector review experience.
Grading and Drainage Review:
Grading and related excavation activities associated with site development can be complicated, particularly in built out cities where development is entirely constrained by existing adjacent built conditions. Required excavation for the construction of basements and underground parking garages, or the installation of earth retaining structures must be completed while protecting existing adjacent buildings, roads, utilities and property improvements. Completion of grading may require interim shoring and other protective measures that must be designed and permitted in advance of the start of construction.
Attention must be paid to grade transitions that result in retaining walls that need to be designed, reviewed and approved in coordination with the Building and Safety and Planning Divisions of the P a g e 27
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 180
Community Development Department. Sites proposed for development may be influenced by significant offsite drainage, and existing drainage facilities may be of limited capacity and require on-site detention to both offset increases in stormwater runoff as well as mitigation of storm drain system deficiencies. The project must be reviewed with respect to the City's grading and drainage requirements, the County of Los Angeles Modified Rational Hydrology methodology and LID requirements, as well as existing site and storm drain system constraints. Timely review and conditioning of project drainage impacts and mitigation measures during the preliminary and design phases of the project allow for a complete and comprehensive process of project evaluation and approval. m6 will provide for review of project grading, site improvement and storm water control components of proposed projects in conformance with the provisions of the California Building Code as amended by the City of Torrance.
Quality Control/ Quality Assurance (QA/QC):
m6 engages in a quality control process that entails 3 primary components: 1. Completeness, 2.
Communication and 3. Layered technical reviews. Quality begins with a complete submittal. Incoming projects are assessed in a ‘triage’ process where initial completeness is assessed, and deficiencies in submittals are addressed. While subtle in nature, deficiencies or omissions in plans, reports lead to repeat reviews, project delays, and owner complaints, much of which can be avoided with a thorough initial review. Communication begins with this completeness review, as m6 reviewers address deficiencies with permit counter staff and applicants and continues with internal staff upon receipt of a complete submittal. Weekly m6 plan check meetings address project staff assignment, routing of specific project reviews and required turnaround. These meetings also address specific review needs, assigned reviewer technical support and coordination for more complex reviews. With the assignment of the project to a reviewer, project checklists, customized to the client city are utilized to ensure a complete review of all project components for code compliance, and the m6 company database of previous technical comments and corrections is used to supplement checklists to address specific code deficiencies. The next level of review will be performed by the company’s lead for City of Torrance plan reviews, to ensure compliance with City standards and code provisions, as well as coordination with other Department reviews. Depending on the size, scope and complexity of the project and related review, the project will be reviewed with a company principal, with additional review by the principal as needed. This 3 – component, layered approach to plan review is key to our quality control and quality assurance process.
m6 Process Management:
Submittals are managed internally in m6 through a Microsoft Access based database and tracking system, which logs submittals, dates received, date of comment transmittal, and current disposition of the documents. This allows for effective tracking of submittals, reporting to the City, and whether these are provided to the reviewer in a timely manner. Additionally, we are familiar with and utilize software’s such as SmartGOV, CLAMS, Bluebeam, Accela, DigEPlan, Microsoft Suites, and Adobe. The m6 team is flexible and is able to adapt to any additional software the City uses.
Meeting Attendance
m6 staff will attend meetings as required during the plan check process, including pre-submittal and design review level meetings. For larger and more complex projects, meetings early in the design process at schematic or design development level are desirable to address significant building design items prior P a g e 28
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 181
to full construction document development. Staff is available and familiar with such early stage reviews, according to the applicants request and City’s approval. m6 staff are frequently requested to attend meetings on behalf of their client cities, as well as to prepare and make presentations to staff, the public, commissions and City Council. According to the City’s direction m6 may attend and participate in local and regional meetings on behalf of the City; including locations other than m6 and City offices.
Communication:
Our philosophy in providing plan check services emphasizes the role of timely review and pro – active communication in the plan review and permitting process. Plan check functions are not a turn – key service but rather an integrated process that often spans multiple City departments as well as other outside agencies that may be involved due to project impacts and conditions of approval. The plan check group coordinates with diverse staff members and agencies relative to plan reviews, comments, status and approvals. The combination of a dynamically experienced and seasoned team with years of experience in development and related review processes allows for the anticipation of issues and communication accordingly to assure a streamlined process. The effective operation and supervision of these functions require knowledgeable presence and leadership. m6 values excellent client and customer service and employs an active style of communication for review projects with City staff and clients. m6 communicates comments and responds to questions by phone, email, on – site at the City, and in – person or virtual meetings. m6 principals will provide management and coordination of plan check operations, ensuring accountability and timeliness of reviews within the organization.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND TURN – AROUND TIMES:
Timing and sequence of project reviews will be coordinated with the City’s intake of plans and disbursement of the project application to m6. Once the plans have been received by the designated point of contact, the project will be entered into our project tracking system and a cursory review will be done to verify the submittal is complete with all the applicable documents, plans and calculations that are required to commence the review. If the submittal is incomplete, the project will be placed on hold and m6 staff will coordinate with City and the applicant to acquire additional documentation required for the review. After a complete submittal has been received and upon authorization by the City, m6 will complete their plan review within a maximum of 10 working days turn-around time. When specifically requested by the applicant and approved by the City, we can provide accelerated reviews according to the availability of staff, including virtual over-the-counter reviews.
Client Satisfaction and Customer Service Philosophy
m6 values excellent client and customer service and provides and maintains an active style of communication for review projects with City staff and clients. Staff members communicate comments and respond to questions by phone and email, attending in – person or virtual meetings when required by City staff. m6 maintains advanced teleconferencing facilities, with the ability to conduct virtual meetings with City staff and clients. The virtual review of plans interactively with design professionals and applicants allows for the rapid identification of issues and the seamless communication of requirements.
P a g e 29
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 182
Our philosophy in providing plan check services emphasizes the role of timely review and pro – active communication in the development review and permitting process. Plan check functions are not a turn – key service but rather an integrated process that spans multiple City departments as well as other outside agencies that may be involved due to project impacts and conditions of approval. The plan check group coordinates with diverse staff members and agencies relative to plan reviews, comments, status, and approvals.
The effective operation and supervision of these functions requires knowledgeable presence and leadership. m6 principals Robert and Masoud will provide oversight of the management and coordination of plan check operations in coordination with senior members of m6 plan check staff, ensuring accountability and timeliness of reviews within the organization. The key to excellence is this integrated program of comprehensive plan check with experienced and seasoned oversight, in conjunction with a keen understanding of municipal inter – departmental permitting functions, in the context of our caring, technologically competent and customer service-oriented staff.
Our Advantages:
m6 provides a unique opportunity for the City to capitalize on decades of experience in working for governmental entities. Such institutional knowledge of the inner workings of governmental organization processes is one of our competitive advantages and will ensure execution of any assigned projects successfully. Our hands – on approach of principal involvement is the core of an integrated strategy of project development and plan review process, which is augmented by the knowledge, collective talent and resources of our team. At a time when the technical aspects of construction and the growing complexity of building codes, design standards and associated research continues to challenge building planners and reviewers, our team provides a knowledgeable and credible resource to the City.
Additional Building and Safety Services
Building Inspection:
The m6 team is supported by ICC certified staff, providing inspection services for field verification of code compliance and consistency with the requirements of the approved plans. m6 can provide inspection services and technical support to the City's building team with knowledgeable and experienced staff who are familiar with both the technical requirements of design plans and the practical nuances of their inspection. When technical issues arise, our design review professionals provide technical and code support to building inspectors, as well as specialized structural, plumbing, mechanical and electrical inspection when required to ensure the intent of the approved plans is achieved in the constructed condition.
Permitting and Front Counter Assistance:
m6 provides permit assistance and front counter support to our municipal clients. m6 professional counter staff provides critical coordination between customers, plan check and inter – departmental personnel, as well as collecting fees, issuing permits, and providing building information to applicants. m6 personnel have provided permit systems research, coordination and implementation, and have assisted with developing and customizing financial reporting tools. m6 permit professionals provide valuable P a g e 30
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 183
front – line expertise, presence and knowledge that is essential to support the excellent customer service required by their municipal clients.
Film Permitting:
m6 is experienced in developing film permitting processes and coordinating existing film permitting activities utilizing local jurisdictional permitting systems. m6 film permitting services are tailored to meet the requirements and guidelines of the City, the community and the film industry. m6 is well able to develop a comprehensive process for the City that addresses all interdepartmental and agency coordination needs and resolve potential conflicts. As a company, m6 provides diverse and adaptive services to jurisdictions, drawing on broad knowledge and experience in planning requirements, public works right – of – way regulation, project analysis and conditioning, and fee collection, utilizing an active and engaging style of communication.
Historic Preservation
Staff member Teal has worked with City Planning Staff on historic preservation efforts, both on projects and Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) meeting attendance. The City of Calabasas is an established Certified Local Government (CLG) by the Office of Historic Preservation and is therefore required to report annually to the State and provide four Historic Preservation Commission meetings within that reporting period. m6 staff have assisted City staff in maintaining State required Certified Local Government (CLG) annual report and has assisted in organizing required Historic Preservation Commission meetings. m6 staff is available to support the City with Historic Preservation Commission by providing staff reports, agendas, minutes for approval, resolutions for adoption, PowerPoint presentations and coordinating training opportunities for Commissioners.
Handouts and Standard Plans
Cities provide a comprehensive range of handouts to inform applicants and designers of Building and Safety requirements and procedures. These documents are available online, and serve to clarify and simplify plan preparation, design and submittal requirements for typical projects. The intent is to clarify requirements, limit confusion in process for applicants, and insure more consistent submittals of required plan check documents. Standard plans, whether City standard or those provided by APWA and Caltrans, ease the design burden on applicants, and help ensure consistency in engineering requirements and built products.
m6 staff have developed informational materials such as web content, guidance documentation including handouts, development guidance, and homeowner guidance for a wide range of building and development topics. Staff have developed policy documents to clarify process requirements, including permit policies, FEMA flood hazard interpretation, and development requirements for a multitude of client cities. Additionally, staff has completed standard plan development and updates for their clients on an as-needed basis for both Building and Public Works related topics. Collectively these efforts allow for m6 staff to efficiently provide accurate and useful customer and design applicants guidance derived from decades of experience in a diverse range of municipalities P a g e 31
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 184
Training
m6 team members have routinely provided training in areas of their expertise for agencies and fellow staff members in the County and incorporated cities. Robert has provided grading, drainage, storm drain, retaining wall and building design training to Works and Community Development staff. Rachel, Luis and Justin have developed and manualized documentation to train staff and inform development process in hybridized projects with vertical, horizontal, geologic and flood hazard challenges. Masoud and Edward have provided code training to city and county staff members for both plan review process, procedure and code updates. Teal keeps the inspectors and counter staff up to date on State requirements for PV and battery projects, updates on procedures in PCM systems, and coordinates the integration of programs like SolarApp+ with City permitting systems. She also works with both inspection staff and counter staff to maintain a collective knowledge of the current and upcoming electrical products to create a united and knowledgeable Building staff. Dan and Jason utilize their 70 years of construction supervision, building inspection and plan review experience to provide training to inspection staff, as well as lessons learned to inform plan check process improvement. Collectively, the m6 team utilizes their knowledge of construction, engineering, and code requirements to be an information resource to City staff and applicants alike.
Benefits of Blended Expertise: Public Works and Building and Safety There are many areas where traditional areas of Building and Safety jurisdiction interact with those of Public Works, and m6 can provide expertise in both. m6 brings this blended expertise to such 'cross – over' areas in a seamless and comprehensible manner as a "value added" benefit to both City staff and applicants alike. Below are some examples.
Retaining Walls Adjacent to Public Right of Way
Frequently the construction of retaining walls for buildings and other structures is required adjacent to City and Caltrans right of way. Such walls require specialized shoring, with design contemplating wheel loading specified in AASHTO's design specifications. Should tie – back anchors be required for temporary or permanent soldier pile stabilization, coordination with Public Works regarding underground utility verification and potholing is necessary to assure the tie back concepts are feasible. Should permanent anchorage be required, we are familiar with the development of encroachment agreements and when these are feasible.
Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Retaining Walls
Increasingly MSE walls are utilized for accomplishing grade transitions in hillside conditions. These are desirable with City Planners due to their ability to be actively vegetated and create a 'living wall' in lieu of a conventional retaining wall. Unlike conventional retaining walls, MSE walls derive their stability from their earth backfill, and their performance is largely based on the placement tie – back geogrids in conjunction with site grading operations. Due to often limited setbacks from property lines, the length of geogrids required to anchor these walls may render their use infeasible. Thus, the review of MSE walls is a geotechnical and grading consideration more typical of Public Works expertise, while the permitting functions traditionally reside in Building and Safety. We have traditionally provided reviews of these P a g e 32
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 185
types of structures between departments, often at an early stage in the project when Planning approvals are required.
On – Site Vehicle and Pedestrian Bridges
Frequently on – site development will contemplate the construction of bridges to accommodate vehicle or pedestrian traffic. The correct review of these structures requires the use of traditional highway standards such as AASHTO's Bridge Design Specifications and the associated standard for the design of pedestrian bridges. These standards are not traditionally understood or utilized by typical Building and Safety plan reviewers and evaluating these structures under the provisions of the CBC is inappropriate and problematic. m6 have experience in the design and review of bridges and understand the appropriate standards and considerations that need to be applied with such structures.
Additional Value – Added Services:
Virtual – Over – The – Counter Plan Review
For a variety of project types, we have presented our clients with the option of virtual over – the – counter reviews. This virtual review process is an excellent method for reviewing projects of smaller scale, updates to larger plan checks, or to address plan changes, deferred submittals or RFIs. It allows for immediate feedback, dialogue, and comments between the plan reviewer, designer, and applicable staff. This in turn results in rapid completion of plan check and design revisions, with comments issued within the meeting and not requiring a typical plan check cycle. Plans are reviewed in a “page – turn” setting via a virtual platform allowing for all applicable teams to join and be a part of the virtual collaborative plan check. Over – the – counter reviews can be scheduled on a recurring basis and held as needed with the respective design team and plan reviewers to address submittals or to preview up – coming submittals. This review method has been a proven success for projects on tight schedules and projects with limited scope for review.
Alternate Methods of Construction
Today’s building projects typically occur in the context of a built environment, often with design elements and approaches that challenge the limits of building codes, often requiring Alternative Means and Methods Requests (AMMRs). The evaluation of alternate and equivalent methods for life safety, egress, smoke control, fire assemblies and other features requires not only a detailed knowledge of code and referenced standard provisions, but also the theory behind these codes and standard provisions. Code compliance is based not only upon the suite of Title 24 building code documents, but also inclusive of an extensive range of referenced standards which include those of ASCE, ASTM, NFPA and others.
Proper verification of code compliance in a design requires knowledge of these standards, as well as the guidance provided by associated commentary and cross-referenced documents.
Floodplain Review and Management
m6 has Certified Flood Plain Managers (CFM) who support the reviews of projects located in flood zones and have supported numerous municipalities with floodplain management duties, as well as in the review of developments that occur in areas prone to flooding. m6 staff provide review services for projects located in special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) using FEMA’s technical bulletins, the local P a g e 33
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 186
jurisdiction ordinances, as well as prepared building handouts and documents to provide to applicants and homeowners.
Fire Protection Plan Review
m6 provides fire protection plan review services for fire sprinkler, fire alarm, UL 300 systems for commercial and residential occupancies, special extinguishing systems, and hazardous material containment and storage CUPA reviews other fire protection system reviews as well as architectural plan reviews for fire protection system requirements and conditions. m6 currently provides these services to the Office of State Fire Marshal, the 23 campuses of the California State University system, the City of Oxnard Fire Department, the Marin Community College District and the University of California, Santa Barbara and Davis Health Campuses. Our expertise and experience with the Office of the State Fire Marshal, municipal and University fire protection plan review provides the City of Pomona a unique opportunity to benefit from our extensive experience reviewing some of the most sophisticated projects in the State of California. Our full list of fire protection plan review services include:
•
•
Fire Alarm Systems
Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems for
Commercial Occupancies
Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems for All
Residential Occupancies
•
•
•
•
CUPA Facilities
Fire Protection Storage Tanks
Kitchen Hood Wet Chemical Systems
Alternative/Clean
Systems
Paint Booth Extinguishing Systems
Underground Systems
•
Agent Extinguishing
•
•
•
•
Fire Pumps
Standpipe and Hose Valve Systems
Atrium/Smoke control Systems
Alternative Means and Methods Requests
(AMMR)
•
•
Hydrology and Hydraulic, Storm Water Quality, Low Impact Development (LID) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Review (SWPPP):
m6 will review hydrology and hydraulic documents for compliance with the Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual, MS4 permit documents, and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. m6 will provide plan review of hydrology and hydraulic technical reports and studies, LID reports, storm water quality, and erosion control and storm water pollution prevention plans for compliance with drainage design standards, hydrology manuals, geotechnical recommendations, local drainage manuals, municipal code, and utilize appropriate hydrology and hydraulics software programs to complete the reviews. m6 is familiar with Los Angeles County hydrology methodology and the related requirements of their Flood Control District, and has performed hydrology, hydraulic, and floodplain model and map reviews for projects in Los Angeles, Ventura, and Riverside Counties.
For projects disrupting one or more acres, m6 will review submitted SWPPP documents for compliance with NPDES/MS4 Permits, CASQA, and California BMP Handbooks.
Engineering and Assessment
m6 provides engineering design, assessment, and reporting capabilities for architectural and structural design projects in multiple jurisdictions. Our company maintains specialized capability in structural design assessment and inspection, with ICC – certified inspection staff and engineers certified under Cal P a g e 34
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 187
OES/FEMA’s Structural Assessment Program (SAP) as post – disaster evaluators. Complimentary to these capabilities is expertise in the design of grading, drainage and public works improvements and infrastructure, which allows for a complete and comprehensive characterization of a proposed building site horizontal and vertical design and understanding.
Disaster Assistance/Recovery
m6 has provided disaster – related recovery assistance and services to cities in Los Angeles, Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties. These services include damage inspections and documentation, coordination with City, County, State (Cal OES) and federal (FEMA/FHWA) staff, and related damage assessment, reporting, cost tracking and reimbursement. m6 team members include former FEMA and Cal OES officials, who can provide knowledgeable navigation of State and Federal code requirements related to Cal OES and FEMA disaster funding. The declaration of a Federal Disaster creates opportunities for grant funding for mitigation activities that will address future disasters and related preparedness. m6 has prepared mitigation grant proposals for multiple cities to access funding through FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), with associated technical documentation and benefit – cost assessments (BCA’s). In recent years, m6 has provided disaster assistance and related management of projects for the cities of Calabasas, Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, Oxnard, Santa Paula, Goleta and the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District.
An important function of the building consultant is the implementation of disaster management tools provided by FEMA through the Applied Technology Council (ATC). This includes the implementation of damage surveys subsequent to flood, landslide, and earthquake events. Such tools include ATC – 20 and its provisions for rapid, detailed assessment of buildings for occupancy after a disaster, with related green, yellow and red tags. The City's Repair and Reconstruction ordinance reflects the findings of CALBO/FEMA's recommendations for damage assessment, repair and reconstruction following a disaster, and employs the evaluation and rehabilitation provisions of ASCE 31 Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings and ASCE 41 Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. m6 staff members include multiple CalOES – certified Safety Assessment Program (SAP) evaluators, including Robert, Masoud, Luis, Nicole, and Justin.
P a g e 35
Work Plan
m6 Consulting Inc. 805.379.1015 | www.m6ConsultingInc.com 188
Proposal Submittal (continued):
m6 Consulting Inc.Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ References:
Please supply the names of companies/agencies for which you recently supplied comparable goods/services as requested in this RFP. A minimum of three (3) references is required; additional references are optional. References from public agencies are preferred. Do not include the City of Torrance as a reference for this RFP.
Name of Company/Agency: City of Calabasas
Street Address: 100 Civic Center Way
City:
State, Zip Code: Calabasas, CA 91302
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Building and Public Works Plan Review, Inspection, Front Counter Support, CIP Engineering Services, Permit Software Integration and Management, CASp ServicesForms and Policy Development, OWTS Policy Development and Review, Development Review
Committee (DRC) Services.
1 Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
Mr. Sparky Cohen, Building Official
818.224.1721
[email protected]
Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City of Oxnard
300 W 3rd St
City, State Zip Code: Oxnard, CA 93030
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Building and Public Works Plan Review, CIP Engineering Services, City Engineering, Project Management, CASp Services, Solar Review, Fire Plan Check, Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Review, Forms and Policy Development, Grant and
Funding Application Services
2 Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
Mr. Jeff Pengilley, P.E Community Development Director
805.385.8208
[email protected]
Name of Company/Agency:
Street Address:
City of Agoura Hills
30001 Ladyface Ct
Agoura Hills, CA 91301City, State Zip Code:
What Product/Service did you
provide to this Company/Agency?
Building Plan Review, Inspection, CIP Engineering
Services, Interim Building Official Support, Expedited
Solar Review, Forms and Policy Development,
Ordinance Development
3 Name of Person to Contact:
Phone Number of Contact:
Email Address of Contact:
Mr. Lukas Quach, PE Building Official
818.597.7334
[email protected]
36 189
Proposal Submittal (continued):
Vendor Name: _
m
_
6 C
_
on
_
su
_
ltin
_
g
_
Inc
_
.
____________________________________________________RFP Submittal Requirement and Acknowledgement Vendors are required to answer each of the questions listed below. You must indicate below that you have provided this information in your proposal submittal. You must attach additional sheets to your RFP submittal describing in detail the service you are proposing.
RFP Scope of Work Questions Indicate what page in your
proposal you have
answered this question.
Did you include a signed Affidavit Form with your RFP Submittal? Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Did you include proof of a valid State of California Civil, Structural, Geotechnical Engineering License.
Did you include proof of a valid Certified Access Specialist (CASp) certification from California Division of State Architect.
Did you include proof of relevance certifications to perform plan review and inspection?
Did you attach additional sheets to answer the Background and Recent Experience with Similar Projects information within this RFP? 37Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you complete a project proposal as described in the Technical Requirements?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Did you review all addenda, if any, issued by the City? Did you include resumes of no more than three (3) qualified candidates? 44Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you include References? Yes No
36Page ___ of our submittal
Are your Wage Rates (Non-Prevailing) Included? Yes No
40Page ___ of our submittal.
Have you included Proposed Alternative Language to City’s Pro Forma Yes No Consulting Services Agreement (if applicable) XPage ___ of our submittal 37 190
Proposal Submittal (continued):
m6 Consulting IncVendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ RFP Submittal Requirement and Acknowledgement Continued Vendors are required to answer each of the questions listed below. You must indicate below that you have provided this information in your proposal submittal. You must attach additional sheets to your RFP submittal describing in detail the service you are proposing.
RFP Scope of Work Questions Indicate what page in your
proposal you have answered
this question.
Did you indicate your price to provide the plans review services as indicated in this RFP?
Yes No
40Page ___ of our submittal.
Did you describe your experience with plan check review? Yes No
6-35
Page ___ of our submittal.
38 191
Proposal Submittal (continued):
m6 Consulting Inc.Vendor Name: ____________________________________________________________ Price Proposal Cost Breakdown To Provide the Services Required in this RFP Description No. of Hours Labor Cost/hr ($) Cost
Plan Check Engineer N/A $140 $ See Attached Rate Sheet
$
$
$
$
$
$
CASp Certified Professional
Senior Building Inspector
Permit Technician
N/A
N/a
N/a
120 See Attached Rate Sheet
115 See Attached Rate Sheet
75 See Attached Rate Sheet
Total Price Proposal $ See Attached Rate Sheet
Price Proposal
In accordance with your "Request for Proposal", the following price proposal is submitted to the City of Torrance. We understand that our price submittal is a not to exceed amount and that if we are selected to enter into negotiations with the City the pricing may be adjusted down unless additional services are requested and pricing will be negotiated and adjusted accordingly.
Category Description
(Vendor must attached a full description for each
category explaining what they are proposing) All services must be itemized. Do not bundle.
Proposal Not to Exceed
Amount by Category Description
Building Plan Check** $ See Attached Rate Sheet
$Total Amount for Project See Attached Rate Sheet
** This review include energy, green building, accessibility, references and all applicable codes and statues.
See Attached Comprehensive Fee Schedule.
39 192
m6 Consulting, Inc.
Expedited Plan Check Services for Community Development Department December 16, 2024
Fee Schedule
Plan Check Services: Percentage/Fixed Fee*
Building Plan Review ............................................................................... 60% of Fee 60% of Fee
60% of Fee
60% of Fee
60% of Fee
60% of Fee**
Structural Only Plan Review ...............................................................................
Electrical, Plumbing, or Mechanical Plan Review......................................................
Grading and Drainage Plan Review .....................................................................
Fire Plan Review
Expedited Reviews
.............................................................................. ............................................................................... *Fee is 60% collected City’s expedited plan check fee, 65% if eighty percent of project’s plan check turn – around times are met.
Hourly Plan Check Services: Hourly*
Plan Review Fee ............................................................................... $140.00 $140.00
$165.00
$175.00
Revision to Approved Plans ..............................................................................
Senior Plan Check Engineer ...............................................................................
Plan Check Supervisor ............................................................................... * Reviews include 3 – checks and will be billed hourly thereafter. * One – hour minimum fee will be billed for hourly plan review services. m6 Hourly Services:
Plan Check Engineer
Certified Plans Examiner
Senior Building Inspector
Building Inspector
............................................................................... $140.00 $140.00
$115.00
$100.00
$85.00
............................................................................... ............................................................................... ...............................................................................
Assistant Building Inspector ...............................................................................
Electrical Reviewer
Electrical Engineer
Mechanical Reviewer
Mechanical Engineer
Structural Reviewer
Structural Engineer
............................................................................... ............................................................................... ............................................................................... ............................................................................... ............................................................................... ............................................................................... $140.00
$175.00
$140.00
$175.00
$140.00
$175.00
$175.00
$195.00
$220.00
$220.00
$175.00
$145.00
$145.00
$120.00
$225.00
$115.00
$75.00
Hydrology/Hydraulic Engineer............................................................................
Onsite Wastewater Engineer...............................................................................
Traffic Engineer ...............................................................................
Soils/Geotechnical Engineer...............................................................................
Civil Engineer ............................................................................... ............................................................................... ...............................................................................
Building Official
Fire Protection Specialist
CASp Certified Professional ...............................................................................
Principal Engineer ...............................................................................
Community Development Analyst ........................................................................
Permit Technician
Permit Engineer
Public Works Inspector
............................................................................... ............................................................................... ............................................................................... $145.00
$125.00
* Rates are increased by a factor of 1.5 times for overtime, and for holiday and weekend assignments. All rates are subject to a 3.5% or Consumer Price Index (CPI) whichever is greater increase annually on January 1 st