Cities Index.
Agenda Item 4A

Torrance City Council
July 22, 2025

Document
Agenda Item 4A
Meeting
July 22, 2025
Body
Torrance City Council
Pages
2
Original file
201 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on torranceca.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

4A
Date: July 22, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Aram Chaparyan, City Manager
By: Brianne Cohen, Civil Service Manager | [email protected] Subject: City Manager – Conduct Closed Hearing on the Appeal of the Civil Service Commission Decision Sustaining the Suspension of a Reprographic Specialist.

Consideration of Public Employee Discipline will be Conducted in Closed Session per California Government Code Section 54957(b)(1), Unless the Employee Requests to have the Appeal Conducted in Public Session. The Deliberation of this Matter by the City Council will occur in Closed Session. Expenditure: None.

RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation of the City Manager that City Council conduct a closed hearing to consider an appeal of the Civil Service Commission’s decision sustaining the suspension of a Reprographic Specialist, unless the employee requests to have the hearing in public session and that the City Council’s deliberation of this matter shall occur in closed session.

FUNDING
None required.

DISCUSSION
The hearing in the appeal of the suspension of a Reprographic Specialist was delegated to a Committee of the Civil Service Commission by the Civil Service Commission on July 22, 2024.

The Committee of the Civil Service Commission heard the appeal on January 7, 8, 9, 27, 29, and 30, 2025 and adopted their findings on February 24, 2025. On March 3, 2025, the Civil Service Commission adopted the Committee of the Civil Service Commission’s Findings of Facts- Recommendations and upheld the suspension of the Reprographic Specialist. On March 5, 2025, the Commission formally adopted their decision to uphold the suspension. On March 17, 2025, the appellant filed a timely appeal of the Civil Service Commission’s decision.

Under the provisions of Torrance Municipal Code Section 14.47.13, an appeal to your Honorable Body must be filed within 10 days of the Commission’s decision. The Appellant filed a timely appeal. Legal counsel for the department then filed a motion to dismiss the appeal to City Council on June 10, 2025. Legal counsel for the appellant filed an opposition to the motion on June 25, 2025.

At the City Council meeting on July 8, 2025, your Honorable Body set the date of July 22, 2025 on which to hold the hearing to review the Civil Service Commission’s decision in this matter. 1 City Council
July 22, 2025

Page 2 ends

6 1
5 The record on appeal, including the motion to dismiss the appeal; the opposition to the motion; the transcripts of the hearing; the exhibits submitted; and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Orders issued by the Commission; and written briefs from the parties were distributed to your Honorable Body for your study prior to hearing oral arguments.

Your Honorable Body will first hear the motion to dismiss the appeal and the opposition to the motion. Your Honorable Body has the option to grant or deny the motion to dismiss the appeal to City Council. If the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, the hearing will conclude.

If the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied, the hearing will proceed, and in hearing this appeal your Honorable Body has several options available:

1. Return the matter to the Civil Service Commission if you find their decision was not supported by substantial evidence or that new evidence has been discovered which could not have been presented by the exercise of due diligence at the original hearing;

2. Affirm the decision of the Civil Service Commission;

3. Affirm the decision of the Civil Service Commission as to the charges but reduce the penalty;

4. Reverse in whole or in part the Civil Service Commission’s decision as to the charges. In no case may the City Council increase any penalty imposed by the Commission.

ATTACHMENT

1. Torrance Municipal Code Section 14.47.13 – Appeal to City Council Torrance Municipal Code Section 14.47.14 – Record on Appeal Torrance Municipal Code Section 14.47.15 – Newly Discovered Evidence 2 ATTACHMENT 1
3 5
0 1

14.47.13 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL.

Upon written appeal to the City Council filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the decision of the Civil Service Commission, a hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.47.14 . before the City Council at the earliest reasonable time as is consistent with the City Council’s agenda. The appealing and responding parties may be present at the Council hearing and may present written and oral arguments in their favor, and answer any questions from the members of the City Council.

14.47.14 RECORD ON APPEAL.
a) The City Council may uphold or reverse in whole or in part the decision of the Civil Service Commission; provided, however, that in no case may the City Council increase any penalty imposed by the Commission. The City Council may reduce a dismissal to a suspension of not to exceed sixty (60) days. b) The City Council’s deliberations shall be limited to a review of the record on appeal. The record on appeal shall consist only of the following:
1) The written charges, if any, against the employee and his answer, if any:
2) The transcript of the hearing, or any part thereof (if all interested parties so stipulate, the partial transcript shall be sufficient);
3) All other minutes of the Commission and the hearing officer, if any, relating to the matter; 4) Any exhibits admitted into evidence at the hearing; 5) Any memoranda of law submitted to the officer or to the Commission; 6) The decision of the Commission, including its findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommendations, if any;
7) The written exceptions of the parties.
c) In all cases, the City Council shall be bound by the findings of fact of the Civil Service Commission, unless in the opinion of the Council there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decisions. In the event that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision, the case shall be returned to the Commission for additional proceedings.
d) Any decision of the City Council to reverse or modify a decision of the Commission shall not be effective unless made by a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council. 3 14.47.15 NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE.

No evidence not previously submitted and received into evidence by the Civil Service Commission or hearing officer may be considered by the City Council. Upon a showing to the satisfaction of the Council that new and substantial evidence has been discovered which, with the use of due diligence could not reasonably be expected to have been presented at the hearing before the Commission, Committee of the Civil Service Commission or hearing officer, the Council, at its discretion, shall return the matter to the Commission, Committee of the Civil Service Commission or hearing officer to hear such evidence and for further review. 4

← All documents from this meeting