Tracy City Council
December 6, 2022

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the change orders to GradeTech’s contract has already been appr opriated to the
Temporary Emergency H ousing Project, CIP 71112, which has sufficient funds remaining in the budget to pay the proposed change order. An additional appropriation of $470,000 from the City of Tracy’s General Fund’s fund balance is needed to pay Tennyson Electric, Inc., and Tracy Grading & Paving, as well as an amendment to the FY 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget to reflect such appropriation.

PUBLIC OUTREACH / INTEREST
Several Public Outreach sessions were conducted by City Staff. A Town Hall style activity was conducted at the Homeless Advisory Committee meeting on August 22, 2022. At this meeting the community gave feedback and support for solutions to our shelter crisis.

COORDINATION
Coordinated efforts between City departments continue, including the Public Works Department, South San Joaquin County Fire Authority, Tracy Police Department, and the Code Enforcement team to proactively address issues related to homelessness and providing bi-weekly park clean- ups. These clean-ups also serve as an opportunity to educate the unsheltered population on available resources in the community and the upcoming transition plan once the shelter sites are onboard. The Ad Hoc Homeless Committee heard a summary of this item on October 20, 2022.

CEQA DETERMINATION
Government Code section 8698.4 exempts the application of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to various actions taken by public agencies to implement the construction of
a homeless shelter in response to a declared shelter crisis. In addition, the interim solutions taken thus far are in furtherance of and related to the permanent solution that will be implemented, referred to as the Temporary Emergency Housing Project on Arbor Avenue (CIP 71112). A Notice of Exemption was issued on October 16, 2020 for the Temporary Emergency Housing site at 500 Arbor Avenue in accordance with Government Code sections 65660-65662 for Low Barrier navigation Centers and Section 15269(c) of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs.
15269(c) for Emergency Projects). No environmental impacts beyond those already analyze
d for the CIP exist; accordingly, no further CEQA analysis is needed.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This agenda item supports the Public Safety Strategic Priority, Implement the adopted Homelessness Strategic Plan. More specifically, by adopting this new resolution, the City Council would reaffirm their commitment to follow through with the strategic priorities set f orth in their Strategic Plan.

ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution (1) ratifying, retroactively and prospectively, the following two construction contracts: (a) Tennyson Electric, Inc. (Tennyson) in the amount of $125,000 for work performed and $125,000 in anticipated work; (b) Tracy Grading Agenda Item 3.D
December 6, 2022

& Paving (Tracy Grading) in the amount of $220,000 for work performed; (2) (a) Authorizing an appropriation of $470,000 from the City of Tracy’s General Fund to fund the Tennyson and Tracy Grading contracts; and (b) amending the FY 2022-23 operating and capital budget to reflect such appropriation; (3) granting, retroactively and prospectively, to the City Manager additional authority to execute change orders to the contract awarded to GradeTech, Inc. for CIP 71112 Arbor Temporary Emergency Housing Project in the original amount of $1,978,480 as follows: (a) $790,000 for work performed; and (b) $300,000 in anticipated work; and (4) adopting requisite findings under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Prepared by: Leisser Mazariegos, Associate Civil Engineer Reviewed by: Kris Balaji, PMP, PE, Director of Development Services Sara Cowell, Finance Director
Midori Lichtwardt, Assistant City Manager
Approved by: Michael Rogers, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

TRACY CITY COUNCIL
RES
OLUTION 2022-_____
(1) RAT

IFYING, RETROACTIVELY AND PROSPECTIVELY, THE FOLLOWING
TWO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS: (A) TENNYSON ELECTRIC, INC. (TENNYSON) IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,000 FOR WORK PERFORMED AND $125,000 IN ANTICIPATED WORK; (B) TRACY GRADING & PAVING (TRACY GRADING) IN THE AMOUNT OF $220,000 FOR WORK PERFORMED;
(2) (A) AUTHORIZING AN APPROPRIATION OF $470,000 FROM THE CITY OF TRACY’S GENERAL FUND TO FUND THE TENNYSON AND TRACY GRADING CONTRACTS; AND (B) AMENDING THE FY 2022 -23 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET TO REFLECT SUCH APPROPRIATION;
(3)

GRANTING, RETROACTIVELY AND PROSPECTIVELY, TO THE CITY

MANAGER ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDERS TO THE CONTRACT AWARDED TO GRADETECH, INC. FOR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) 71112 ARBOR TEMPORARY EMERGENCY HOUSING PROJECT IN THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT OF $1,978,480 AS FOLLOWS: (A) $790,000 FOR WORK PERFORMED ; AND (B) $300,000 IN ANTICIPATED WORK; AND
(4) ADOPTING REQUISITE FINDINGS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHERE
AS, on March 10, 2020, the Tracy City Council (Council) adopted Resolution No. 2020-050, which declared a shelter crisis pursuant to California Government Code Section 8698.2; and
WHERE
AS, for the next two years, the City of Tracy (City) actively pursued the development and construction of a temporary housing shelter on City-owned land located on Arbor Avenue to serve as an ongoing full-service temporary housing solution for the City’s unsheltered (Temporary Emergency Housing Project, CIP 71112); and WHERE
AS, during this period, the City designed the facility and nearly completed Phase I of the Temporary Emergency Housing Project, consisting of groundwork and utility construction, and had anticipated opening the Temporary Emergency Housing Project by December 2022; and
WHERE
AS, in the summer of 2022, the City experienced a significant setback after the opening of bids for the installation of the sprung structure, which would cause a significant delay in the completion of the Temporary Emergency Housing Project; and WHERE
AS, on August 16, 2022, due to this significant delay, the ongoing threat to the health and safety of the unsheltered population, and in anticipation of the necessity to protect Resolution 2022-____

the unsheltered from exposure to harsh weather conditions during the upcoming winter season, Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-121 (Resolution), which reaffirmed an emergency shelter crisis, pursuant to California Government Code 8698.4, to immediately address the increasing number of unsheltered individuals within the City; and
WHERE
AS, due to the declaration of an emergency, the Resolution authorized the City Manager to take requisite actions needed to expeditiously provide interim housing solutions; and,
WHERE
AS, during this time the City was also exploring the leasing and purchasing of fully constructed modular units to locate on Arbor Avenue and did not anticipate undertaking additional construction activities at the site; and
WHERE
AS, the City moved forward to house unsheltered residents of the City by installing prefabricated trailers; and
WHERE
AS, to install these trailers, additional accommodations to the current site needed to be made, all of which were not within the original scope of work for GradeTech’s contract, and included additional groundwork and utility connections (water, sewer, electrical), installation of fencing and signage, and procurement of generators and furniture; and WHERE
AS, on November 1, 2022, through Resolution No. 2022-162, the Council ratified a set of actions that had been taken by the City Manager to address the shelter emergency; now, therefore, be it
RESOL
VED: That the City Council hereby ratifies, retroactively and prospectively, the following two construction contracts: (a) Tennyson Electric, Inc. (Tennyson) in the amount of $125,000 for work performed and $125,000 in anticipated work; (b) Tracy Grading & Paving (Tracy Grading) in the amount of $220,000 for work performed; and be it FURTHE
R RESOLVED: That the City Council hereby authorizes an appropriation of $470,000 from the City of Tracy’s general fund to fund the Tennyson and Tracy Grading contracts; and (b) Amends the FY 2022-23 operating and capital budget to reflect such appropriation; and be it
FURTHE
R RESOLVED: That the City Council hereby grants, retroactively and prospectively, to the City Manager additional authority to execute change orders to the contract awarded to GradeTech, Inc. for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 71112 Arbor Temporary Emergency Housing Project in the original amount of $1,978,480 as follows: (a) $790,000 for work performed; and (b) $300,000 in anticipated work; and be it FURTHE
R RESOLVED: That the City Council finds and determines that Government Code section 8698.4 exempts the application of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to various actions taken by public agencies to implement the construction of a homeless shelter in response to a declared shelter crisis, the interim solutions taken thus far are in furtherance of and related to the permanent solution that will be implemented, referred to as the Temporary Emergency Housing Project on Arbor Avenue (CIP 71112), a Notice of Exemption was issued on October 16, 2020, for the Temporary Emergency Housing Project in accordance with Government Code sections 65660-65662 for Low Barrier navigation Centers and Section 15269(c) of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15269(c) for Emergency Resolution 2022-____

Projects), no environmental impacts beyond those already analyzed for the CIP exist, and accordingly, no further CEQA analysis is needed.
* * * * * * *
* * * * * * *
The foregoing Resolution 2022-_____ was adopted by the Tracy City Council on the 6th day of December
2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSEN
T:

ABSTENTION:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:
______________________________
NANCY D. YOUNG
Mayor
of the City of Tracy, California
ATTEST: ________________________

ADRIANNE RICHARDSON
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of
the City
of Tracy, California
December 6, 2022
Agenda Item 3.E

RECOMMENDA
TION
Adopting a Resolution authorizing 1) amendments to the Employment Agreement dated December 13, 2021, between Michael Rogers and the City of Tracy, to reflect a merit increase of 6% for an annual base salary of $286,536 and other increases to total compensation and benefits, and 2) amending the Master Salary Schedule relating to the City Manager, effective December 11, 2022, to reflect such amendments.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report authorizes amendments to the Employment Agreement between Michael Rogers and the City of Tracy relating to compensation and benefits effective December 11, 2022 (Employment Agreement).

BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
On December 7, 2021, the City Council approved an Employment Agreement for Michael Rogers to serve as the City Manager beginning on December 13, 2021. As the one-year employment anniversary for Mr. Rogers is approaching, the City Council conducted performance evaluations in November 2022. Based on those evaluations and a determination of outstanding performance, the City Council seeks to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect a merit increase and amend certain benefits, effective December 11, 2022.

The Public Employees’ Retirement Law governs the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) codified in Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations. Section 570.5 of the California Code of Regulations requires the City Council to approve the rate of pay or classification titles in a public available pay schedule for employees who are members of CalPERS. State law requires that the City Council approve a Master Salary Schedule reflecting the salaries of all personnel.

ANALYSIS
In reviewing the City Manager’s performance, the City Council recommends a merit increa se in
the amount of 6% for an annual base salary of $286,536, effective December 11, 2022.

Contingent upon Council approval of the City of Tracy Compensation Philosophy, which is a separate agenda item for consideration and approval by the Council, the annual base salary for the City Manager classification will be adjusted to reflect the approved internal alignment principles.

Additional amendments, effective as of December 11, 2022, include: an increase in car allowance from $500 to $700 per month, prorated per pay period; an increase to the housing allowance from $750 to $1000 per month, prorated per pay period; an increase to vacation accrual from 160 hours to 200 hours per year through December 12, 2026; and of the cost of an annual executive physical examination, including the cost and time to attend the examination.

Agenda Item 3.E
December 6, 2022

FISCAL IMPACT
The
proposed changes will be absorbed within the established FY2022-23 budget through vacancy savings.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This agenda item supports the City’s Governance Strategy and Business Plan, and specifically implements the following goals and objectives:

Governance Strategy
Goal 1: Further develop an organization to attract, motivate, develop, and retain a high-quality, engaged, high-performing, and informed workforce.

Objective 1b: Affirm organizational values.

ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Adopting a Resolution authorizing 1) amendments to the Employment Agreement dated December 13, 2021, between Michael Rogers and the City of Tracy, to reflect a merit increase of
6% for an annual base salary of $286,536 and other increases to total compensation and benefits,
and 2) amending the Master Salary Schedule relating to the City Manager, effective December
11, 2022, to reflect such amendments.

Attachments:

A – Amended
Employment Agreement Between Michael Rogers and the City of Tracy B - Employment Agreement Between Michael Rogers and the City of Tracy dated
December 13, 2021
C – Master Salary Schedule Effective December 11, 2022
Amendment to Employment Agreement
City of Tracy and Michael Rogers

AMENDMEN

T TO EMPLOYMENT

AGREEMENT BETWEEN

MICHAEL ROGERS AND THE CITY OF TRACY
This Amendment to an E
mployment Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") is made and entered into between the City of Tracy, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and Michael Rogers, an individual ("EMPLOYEE"), both of whom agree as follows:

RECITALS:

1. On December
7, 2021, the City Council approved an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) with Michael Rogers to serve as City Manager.

2. An employee eval
uation was conducted during Closed Session on November 15, 2022, and the parties have agreed to amend certain compensation and benefit provisions contained in the Agreement.

1. Incorporation by Refer
ence. This Amendment incorporates by reference all terms set forth in the Agreement, unless specifically modified by this Amendment. The terms which are not specifically modified by this Amendment will remain in effect.

2. Amendment to S
ubsection A of Section 3. Effective December 11, 2022, Subsection A, “Base Salary” of Section 3, “Compensation and Benefits” of the Agreement is hereby amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:
“The CITY agrees to pay
EMPLOYEE an annual base salary of $286,536, payable in
accordance with a pre-determined schedule applicable to all CITY employees. This increase reflects a merit increase of 6%. Contingent upon Council approval of the City of Tracy Compensation Philosophy, the annual base salary will be adjusted to reflect the approved internal alignment principals.”

3. Amendment to S
ubsection E of Section 3. Effective December 11, 2022, Subsection E, “Car Allowance” of Section 3, “Compensation and Benefits” of the Agreement is hereby amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:
“Employee i
s entitled to receive a car allowance of $700 per month, prorated per pay period”.

4. Amendment to S
ubsection F of Section 3. Effective December 11, 2022, Subsection F, “Housing Allowance” of Section 3, “Compensation and Benefits” of the Agreement is hereby amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:
“Employee i
s entitled to receive a housing allowance of $1,000 per month, prorated per month, prorated per pay period, conditioned on maintaining his principal residence in the City of Tracy Incorporated area, or its sphere of influence as defined by the San Joaquin County LAFCO. Should EMPLOYEE no longer maintain a principal residence as provided above, the housing allowance shall be suspended during the period the EMPLOYEE’s principal residence is not in the City of Tracy or its sphere of influence.” DocuSign Envelope ID: 75A6EB23-C9B1-4E18-8756-9ABDC372C43F

ATTACHMENT A
Amendment to Employment Agreement
City of Tracy and Michael Rogers

5. Amendment
to Subsection J (1) of Section 3. Effective December 11, 2022, Subsection 1 “Vacation Credit and Accrual” of Subsection J “Accrual and Use of Leave” of Section 3, “Compensation and Benefits” of the Agreement is hereby amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:
“Upon com
mencing employment, EMPLOYEE shall be credited with 80 hours of vacation leave. Thereafter, during the duration of employment with the CITY, EMPLOYEE shall accrue vacation leave at a prorated rate of 200 hours per year through December 12, 2026.”

6. Addition of
Subsection M of Section 3. Effective December 11, 2022, Subsection M “Annual Executive Physical” will be added to Section 3, “Compensation and Benefits” of the Agreement to read, in its entirety, as follows:
“The CITY agr
ees to provide for the cost and time to attend an annual executive physical examination, if desired and requested.”

1. Modificatio
ns. This Amendment may not be modified orally or in any manner other than by an agreement in writing signed by both parties, in accordance with the requirement of the Agreement.

2. Severability.

If any term of this Amendment is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Amendment shall be construed as not containing that term, and the remainder of this Amendment shall remain in effect.

3. Signatures.

The individuals executing this Amendment represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and to execute this Amendment.

This Amendment shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and their respective successors and assigns.

CITY

OF TRACY (EMPLOYER) MICHAEL ROGERS (EMPLOYEE)
________________________________ __________________________________ N
ancy Young, Mayor Michael Rogers
Dated: __________________________ Dated: ____________________________ ATTEST:

___________________________________
Adrianne R
ichardson, City Clerk
Dated: _____________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 75A6EB23-C9B1-4E18-8756-9ABDC372C43F 11/23/2022 | 1:01 PM PST

Amendment to Employment Agreement
City of Tracy and Michael Rogers

APPROVED
AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Bijal
M. Patel, City Attorney
Dated: _____________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 75A6EB23-C9B1-4E18-8756-9ABDC372C43F

ATTACHMENT B

Employment Agreement
City of Tracy and Michael Rogers

J. Accrual and Use of Leave.

1. Vacation Credit and Accrual. Upon commencing employment, EMPLOYEE shall be credited with 80 hours of vacation leave. Thereafter, during the duration of employment with CITY, EMPLOYEE shall accrue vacation leave at a prorated rate of 160 hours per year through December 12, 2026. Thereafter, during the duration of employment with CITY, EMPLOYEE shall accrue vacation leave in the same amount as provided to other employees covered by the most currently adopted Department Heads Compensation and Benefits Plan.

2. Sick Leave Credit and Accrual. Upon commencing employment, EMPLOYEE shall be credited with 40 hours of sick leave. Thereafter, EMPLOYEE shall accrue sick leave at the rate of 96 hours per year, prorated per pay period.

3. Management Leave. It is recognized that EMPLOYEE must devote a great deal of time outside the normal office hours to business of the CITY, and to that end, EMPLOYEE will be allowed to accrue and use Management Leave as contained in the most currently adopted Department Heads Compensation and Benefits Plan.

Upon commencing employment, EMPLOYEE shall be credited with a prorated amount of 120 hours of management leave for the remainder of the 2021 calendar year.

4. Use of Leave. EMPLOYEE is entitled to accrue all leave, without limit, and if EMPLOYEE's employment is terminated, either voluntarily or involuntarily, EMPLOYEE shall be compensated for all unsued accrued vacation leave at the rate of pay on the date of separation. EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to "buy back" vacation and Management Leave in the same manner as permitted for other employees covered by the most currently adopted Department Heads Compensatioa and Benefits Plan.

H. Deferred Compensation. CITY shall contribute 5% of EMPLOYEE's base salary to EMPLOYEE's 401 Plan deferred compensation.

I. CalPERS (California Public Employees' Retirement System). EMPLOYEE shall pay the full employee contribution share under the applicable Cal PERS formula.

Section 4: Performance Evaluation.

It is mutually agreed that the adopted operating budget for each fiscal year generally contains the goals and objectives developed by the CITY. Within 90 days of the date of this Agreement, or at some other mutually agreeable time, EMPLOYEE and the City Council will meet to discuss and establish performance goals for EMPLOYEE. A facilitator selected by EMPLOYEE and agreeable to the City Council may facilitate the discussion. The fees for the facilitator shall be paid by the CITY. Thereafter, the City Council and EMPLOYEE shall meet on an annual basis to
evaluate EMPLOYEE's performance. The City Council shall provide EMPLOYEE with a written performance evaluation in such format as the City Council may determine. If the City Council concludes EMPLOYEE's job performance warrants a salary increase for merit, the Council may grant a merit adjustment in an amount determined by the Council, to be effective on a date determined by the Council. Such merit adjustments may be granted on one or more occasions during the term of this Agreement.

Employment Agreement
City of Tracy and Michael Rogers

Alternatively, notices required under this Agreement, may be personally served in the same manner as is applicable to civil judicial practice.

D. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and establishes the entire understanding between the CITY and EMPLOYEE relating to the employment of EMPLOYEE by the CITY. Any prior discussions or representations by or between the parties are merged into this Agreement. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained In this Agreement shall be valid and binding.

E. Amendments. The parties by mutual written agreement may amend any provision of this Agreement during the life of the Agreement. The amendments shall be incorporated and made a part of this Agreement.

F. Heirs. This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs at law and executors of EMPLOYEE. If the EMPLOYEE dies prior to the expiration of the term of employment, any monies that may be due EMPLOYEE from CITY under this Agreement as of the date of EMPLOYEE's death shall be paid to EMPLOYEE's executors, administrators, heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns.

G. Severability. If any provision or portion of this Agreement is held unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected, but shall remain in effect.

H. Written Materials. All written, printed, and electronic materials used byEMPLOYEE in performing duties for CITY are and shall remain the property of CITY. Upon termination of employment, EMPLOYEE shall return such material to CITY.

I. Waiver. The parties shall not be deemed to have waived any of their respective rights under this Agreement unless the waiver is in writing and signed by such waiving party.

J. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, provided however, that EMPLOYEE's first day of employment shall be on or before December 13, 2021.

CITY OF TRACY (EMPLOYER) MICHAEL ROGERS (EMPLOYEE)
Michael Rogers
Dated: _..&,/ � .,._l_·z----'-1+-/-�_o_:z.-=-'--

City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
4112 Account Clerk TTSSEA A 2,176.60 4,715.97 56,591.60 27.2075 B 2,285.44 4,951.79 59,421.44 28.5680
C 2,399.70 5,199.35 62,392.20 29.9963
D 2,519.69 5,459.33 65,511.94 31.4961
E 2,645.68 5,732.31 68,787.68 33.0710
3106 Accountant* TMMBU A 3,422.14 7,414.64 88,975.64 42.7768 B 3,593.25 7,785.38 93,424.50 44.9156
C 3,772.91 8,174.64 98,095.66 47.1614
D 3,961.54 8,583.34 103,000.04 49.5193
E 4,159.62 9,012.51 108,150.12 51.9953
2520 Accounting Manager* CONF A 4,947.25 10,719.04 128,628.50 61.8406 B 5,194.61 11,254.99 135,059.86 64.9326
C 5,454.35 11,817.76 141,813.10 68.1794
D 5,727.07 12,408.65 148,903.82 71.5884
E 6,013.44 13,029.12 156,349.44 75.1680
4201 Accounting Technician TTSSEA A 2,676.79 5,799.71 69,596.54 33.4599 B 2,810.65 6,089.74 73,076.90 35.1331
C 2,951.17 6,394.20 76,730.42 36.8896
D 3,098.74 6,713.94 80,567.24 38.7343
E 3,253.69 7,049.66 84,595.94 40.6711
4102 Administrative Assistant TTSSEA A 2,166.98 4,695.12 56,341.48 27.0873 B 2,275.31 4,929.84 59,158.06 28.4414
C 2,389.09 5,176.36 62,116.34 29.8636
D 2,508.53 5,435.15 65,221.78 31.3566
E 2,633.95 5,706.89 68,482.70 32.9244
8102 Administrative Assistant - Confidential CONF A 2,220.71 4,811.54 57,738.46 27.7589 B 2,331.73 5,052.08 60,624.98 29.1466
C 2,448.32 5,304.69 63,656.32 30.6040
D 2,570.75 5,569.96 66,839.50 32.1344
E 2,699.28 5,848.44 70,181.28 33.7410
4107 Administrative Technician TTSSEA A 2,676.79 5,799.71 69,596.54 33.4599 B 2,810.65 6,089.74 73,076.90 35.1331
C 2,951.17 6,394.20 76,730.42 36.8896
D 3,098.74 6,713.94 80,567.24 38.7343
E 3,253.69 7,049.66 84,595.94 40.6711
3510 Airport Manager* TMMBU A 3,473.74 7,526.44 90,317.24 43.4218 B 3,647.41 7,902.72 94,832.66 45.5926
C 3,829.78 8,297.86 99,574.28 47.8723
D 4,021.26 8,712.73 104,552.76 50.2658
E 4,222.32 9,148.36 109,780.32 52.7790
5522 Animal Services Aide TEAMSTERS A 1,485.35 3,218.26 38,619.10 18.5669 B 1,559.62 3,379.18 40,550.12 19.4953
C 1,637.62 3,548.18 42,578.12 20.4703
D 1,719.49 3,725.56 44,706.74 21.4936
E 1,805.46 3,911.83 46,941.96 22.5683
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 1

ATTACHMENT C
Effective 12/11/2022
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3620 Animal Services Manager* TMMBU A 3,731.54 8,085.00 97,020.04 46.6443 B 3,918.12 8,489.26 101,871.12 48.9765
C 4,114.03 8,913.73 106,964.78 51.4254
D 4,319.72 9,359.39 112,312.72 53.9965
E 4,535.71 9,827.37 117,928.46 56.6964
5521 Animal Services Officer I TEAMSTERS A 2,067.32 4,479.19 53,750.32 25.8415 B 2,170.66 4,703.10 56,437.16 27.1333
C 2,279.18 4,938.22 59,258.68 28.4898
D 2,393.14 5,185.14 62,221.64 29.9143
E 2,512.82 5,444.44 65,333.32 31.4103
5523 Animal Services Officer II TEAMSTERS A 2,269.74 4,917.77 59,013.24 28.3718 B 2,383.22 5,163.64 61,963.72 29.7903
C 2,502.40 5,421.87 65,062.40 31.2800
D 2,627.51 5,692.94 68,315.26 32.8439
E 2,758.91 5,977.64 71,731.66 34.4864
3621 Animal Services Supervisor TMMBU A 2,764.97 5,990.77 71,889.22 34.5621 NON EXEMPT B 2,903.22 6,290.31 75,483.72 36.2903
C 3,048.37 6,604.80 79,257.62 38.1046
D 3,200.79 6,935.05 83,220.54 40.0099
E 3,360.83 7,281.80 87,381.58 42.0104
2573 Assistant City Attorney* CONF A 6,298.08 13,645.84 163,750.08 78.7260 B 6,612.97 14,328.10 171,937.22 82.6621
C 6,943.62 15,044.51 180,534.12 86.7953
D 7,290.80 15,796.73 189,560.80 91.1350
E 7,655.33 16,586.55 199,038.58 95.6916
3338 Assistant City Engineer* TMMBU A 5,303.20 11,490.27 137,883.20 66.2900 B 5,582.32 12,095.03 145,140.32 69.7790
C 5,876.13 12,731.62 152,779.38 73.4516
D 6,185.40 13,401.70 160,820.40 77.3175
E 6,510.94 14,107.04 169,284.44 81.3868
1502 Assistant City Manager* DH Min 9,173.88 19,876.74 238,520.89 114.6735 Max 9,838.86 21,317.53 255,810.35 122.9858
2682 Assistant Director DES* CONF A 6,015.05 13,032.61 156,391.30 75.1881 B 6,315.80 13,684.23 164,210.80 78.9475
C 6,631.58 14,368.42 172,421.08 82.8948
D 6,963.15 15,086.83 181,041.90 87.0394
E 7,311.31 15,841.17 190,094.06 91.3914
2681 Assistant Director DES/City Engineer* CONF A 6,301.83 13,653.97 163,847.58 78.7729 B 6,616.92 14,336.66 172,039.92 82.7115
C 6,947.77 15,053.50 180,642.02 86.8471
D 7,295.15 15,806.16 189,673.90 91.1894
E 7,659.93 16,596.52 199,158.18 95.7491
2635 Assistant Director Operations* CONF A 6,015.05 13,032.61 156,391.30 75.1881 B 6,315.80 13,684.23 164,210.80 78.9475
C 6,631.58 14,368.42 172,421.08 82.8948
D 6,963.15 15,086.83 181,041.90 87.0394
E 7,311.31 15,841.17 190,094.06 91.3914
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 2

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
2636 Assistant Director Utilities* CONF A 6,015.05 13,032.61 156,391.30 75.1881 B 6,315.80 13,684.23 164,210.80 78.9475
C 6,631.58 14,368.42 172,421.08 82.8948
D 6,963.15 15,086.83 181,041.90 87.0394
E 7,311.31 15,841.17 190,094.06 91.3914
3302 Assistant Engineer* TMMBU A 3,577.55 7,751.36 93,016.30 44.7194 B 3,756.40 8,138.87 97,666.40 46.9550
C 3,944.23 8,545.83 102,549.98 49.3029
D 4,141.44 8,973.12 107,677.44 51.7680
E 4,348.52 9,421.79 113,061.52 54.3565
5232 Assistant Planner TEAMSTERS A 2,969.79 6,434.55 77,214.54 37.1224 B 3,118.28 6,756.27 81,075.28 38.9785
C 3,274.19 7,094.08 85,128.94 40.9274
D 3,437.90 7,448.78 89,385.40 42.9738
E 3,609.80 7,821.23 93,854.80 45.1225
2580 Assistant to the City Manager* CONF A 4,947.25 10,719.04 128,628.50 61.8406 B 5,194.61 11,254.99 135,059.86 64.9326
C 5,454.35 11,817.76 141,813.10 68.1794
D 5,727.07 12,408.65 148,903.82 71.5884
E 6,013.44 13,029.12 156,349.44 75.1680
3333 Associate Engineer* TMMBU A 4,019.01 8,707.86 104,494.26 50.2376 B 4,219.94 9,143.20 109,718.44 52.7493
C 4,430.96 9,600.41 115,204.96 55.3870
D 4,652.49 10,080.40 120,964.74 58.1561
E 4,885.11 10,584.41 127,012.86 61.0639
3303 Associate Civil Engineer* TMMBU A 4,019.01 8,707.86 104,494.26 50.2376 B 4,219.94 9,143.20 109,718.44 52.7493
C 4,430.96 9,600.41 115,204.96 55.3870
D 4,652.49 10,080.40 120,964.74 58.1561
E 4,885.11 10,584.41 127,012.86 61.0639
3202 Associate Planner* TMMBU A 3,401.20 7,369.27 88,431.20 42.5150 B 3,571.26 7,737.73 92,852.76 44.6408
C 3,749.82 8,124.61 97,495.32 46.8728
D 3,937.31 8,530.84 102,370.06 49.2164
E 4,134.19 8,957.41 107,488.94 51.6774
4451 Box Office Assistant TTSSEA A 1,951.79 4,228.88 50,746.54 24.3974 B 2,049.39 4,440.35 53,284.14 25.6174
C 2,151.86 4,662.36 55,948.36 26.8983
D 2,259.44 4,895.45 58,745.44 28.2430
E 2,372.44 5,140.29 61,683.44 29.6555
4455 Box Office Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,580.47 5,591.02 67,092.22 32.2559 B 2,709.51 5,870.61 70,447.26 33.8689
C 2,844.97 6,164.10 73,969.22 35.5621
D 2,987.22 6,472.31 77,667.72 37.3403
E 3,136.58 6,795.92 81,551.08 39.2073
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 3

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3104 Budget Officer* CONF A 4,569.96 9,901.58 118,818.96 57.1245 B 4,798.45 10,396.64 124,759.70 59.9806
C 5,038.37 10,916.47 130,997.62 62.9796
D 5,290.30 11,462.32 137,547.80 66.1288
E 5,554.82 12,035.44 144,425.32 69.4353
5211 Building Inspector I TEAMSTERS A 2,665.08 5,774.34 69,292.08 33.3135 B 2,798.33 6,063.05 72,756.58 34.9791
C 2,938.25 6,366.21 76,394.50 36.7281
D 3,085.17 6,684.54 80,214.42 38.5646
E 3,239.42 7,018.74 84,224.92 40.4928
5212 Building Inspector II TEAMSTERS A 3,403.75 7,374.79 88,497.50 42.5469 B 3,573.95 7,743.56 92,922.70 44.6744
C 3,752.63 8,130.70 97,568.38 46.9079
D 3,940.27 8,537.25 102,447.02 49.2534
E 4,137.26 8,964.06 107,568.76 51.7158
5320 Building Maintenance Worker I TEAMSTERS A 2,261.97 4,900.94 58,811.22 28.2746 B 2,375.08 5,146.01 61,752.08 29.6885
C 2,493.84 5,403.32 64,839.84 31.1730
D 2,618.53 5,673.48 68,081.78 32.7316
E 2,749.46 5,957.16 71,485.96 34.3683
5321 Building Maintenance Worker II TEAMSTERS A 2,381.03 5,158.90 61,906.78 29.7629 B 2,500.09 5,416.86 65,002.34 31.2511
C 2,625.09 5,687.70 68,252.34 32.8136
D 2,756.34 5,972.07 71,664.84 34.4543
E 2,894.17 6,270.70 75,248.42 36.1771
3341 Building Official* TMMBU A 5,155.45 11,170.14 134,041.70 64.4431 B 5,413.21 11,728.62 140,743.46 67.6651
C 5,683.88 12,315.07 147,780.88 71.0485
D 5,968.07 12,930.82 155,169.82 74.6009
E 6,266.48 13,577.37 162,928.48 78.3310
4501 Building Permit Technician I TTSSEA A 2,471.54 5,355.00 64,260.04 30.8943 B 2,595.13 5,622.78 67,473.38 32.4391
C 2,724.87 5,903.89 70,846.62 34.0609
D 2,861.12 6,199.09 74,389.12 35.7640
E 3,004.18 6,509.06 78,108.68 37.5523
4502 Building Permit Technician II TTSSEA A 2,601.62 5,636.84 67,642.12 32.5203 B 2,731.71 5,918.71 71,024.46 34.1464
C 2,868.29 6,214.63 74,575.54 35.8536
D 3,011.71 6,525.37 78,304.46 37.6464
E 3,162.30 6,851.65 82,219.80 39.5288
1530 Chief Innovation Officer* DH Min 6,866.78 14,878.03 178,536.32 85.8348 Max 8,339.89 18,069.77 216,837.24 104.2486
1506 City Attorney* CONTRACT 9,548.10 20,687.55 248,250.60 119.3513 Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 4

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3110 City Clerk* TMMBU A 4,580.59 9,924.61 119,095.34 57.2574 B 4,809.63 10,420.87 125,050.38 60.1204
C 5,050.10 10,941.88 131,302.60 63.1263
D 5,302.60 11,488.97 137,867.60 66.2825
E 5,567.73 12,063.42 144,760.98 69.5966
1102 City Council Member* 432.00 936.00 11,232.00
1501 City Manager* CONTRACT 11,020.62 23,878.00 286,536.00 137.7576 1112 City Treasurer* 496.16 1,075.01 12,900.16
9107 Clerical LS A 15.0000
B 15.7500
C 16.5400
D 17.3600
E 18.2300
3155 Code Compliance Analyst* TMMBU A 3,607.67 7,816.62 93,799.42 45.0959 B 3,788.05 8,207.44 98,489.30 47.3506
C 3,977.45 8,617.81 103,413.70 49.7181
D 4,176.33 9,048.72 108,584.58 52.2041
E 4,385.15 9,501.16 114,013.90 54.8144
5202 Code Enforcement Officer TEAMSTERS A 2,752.99 5,964.81 71,577.74 34.4124 B 2,890.63 6,263.03 75,156.38 36.1329
C 3,035.17 6,576.20 78,914.42 37.9396
D 3,186.92 6,904.99 82,859.92 39.8365
E 3,346.27 7,250.25 87,003.02 41.8284
3315 Community Preservation Manager* TMMBU A 4,019.01 8,707.86 104,494.26 50.2376 B 4,219.94 9,143.20 109,718.44 52.7493
C 4,430.96 9,600.41 115,204.96 55.3870
D 4,652.49 10,080.40 120,964.74 58.1561
E 4,885.11 10,584.41 127,012.86 61.0639
5513 Community Services Officer TEAMSTERS A 2,403.89 5,208.43 62,501.14 30.0486 B 2,524.09 5,468.86 65,626.34 31.5511
C 2,650.26 5,742.23 68,906.76 33.1283
D 2,782.79 6,029.38 72,352.54 34.7849
E 2,921.95 6,330.89 75,970.70 36.5244
5222 Construction Inspector I TEAMSTERS A 3,089.33 6,693.55 80,322.58 38.6166 B 3,243.82 7,028.28 84,339.32 40.5478
C 3,405.99 7,379.65 88,555.74 42.5749
D 3,576.29 7,748.63 92,983.54 44.7036
E 3,755.13 8,136.12 97,633.38 46.9391
5223 Construction Inspector II TEAMSTERS A 3,243.62 7,027.84 84,334.12 40.5453 B 3,405.80 7,379.23 88,550.80 42.5725
C 3,576.09 7,748.20 92,978.34 44.7011
D 3,754.92 8,135.66 97,627.92 46.9365
E 3,942.65 8,542.41 102,508.90 49.2831
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 5

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
4605 Crime Analyst TTSSEA A 2,920.43 6,327.60 75,931.18 36.5054 B 3,066.45 6,643.98 79,727.70 38.3306
C 3,219.79 6,976.21 83,714.54 40.2474
D 3,380.78 7,325.02 87,900.28 42.2598
E 3,549.80 7,691.23 92,294.80 44.3725
5514 Crime Prevention Specialist TEAMSTERS A 2,490.06 5,395.13 64,741.56 31.1258 B 2,614.59 5,664.95 67,979.34 32.6824
C 2,745.32 5,948.19 71,378.32 34.3165
D 2,882.56 6,245.55 74,946.56 36.0320
E 3,026.69 6,557.83 78,693.94 37.8336
3622 Crime Scene Property Unit Supervisor TMMBU A 2,828.95 6,129.39 73,552.70 35.3619 Non-Exempt B 2,970.39 6,435.85 77,230.14 37.1299
C 3,118.89 6,757.60 81,091.14 38.9861
D 3,274.83 7,095.47 85,145.58 40.9354
E 3,438.57 7,450.24 89,402.82 42.9821
5517 Crime Scene Technician TEAMSTERS A 2,696.73 5,842.92 70,114.98 33.7091 B 2,831.54 6,135.00 73,620.04 35.3943
C 2,973.13 6,441.78 77,301.38 37.1641
D 3,121.79 6,763.88 81,166.54 39.0224
E 3,277.88 7,102.07 85,224.88 40.9735
1108 Cultural Arts Commissioner Stipend of $50.00 per meeting 3162 Cultural Arts Division Manager* TMMBU A 4,827.54 10,459.67 125,516.04 60.3443 B 5,068.92 10,982.66 131,791.92 63.3615
C 5,322.37 11,531.80 138,381.62 66.5296
D 5,588.47 12,108.35 145,300.22 69.8559
E 5,867.89 12,713.76 152,565.14 73.3486
4459 Cultural Arts Program Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,580.47 5,591.02 67,092.22 32.2559 B 2,709.51 5,870.61 70,447.26 33.8689
C 2,844.97 6,164.10 73,969.22 35.5621
D 2,987.22 6,472.31 77,667.72 37.3403
E 3,136.58 6,795.92 81,551.08 39.2073
3524 Cultural Arts Supervisor* TMMBU A 3,731.54 8,085.00 97,020.04 46.6443 B 3,918.12 8,489.26 101,871.12 48.9765
C 4,114.03 8,913.73 106,964.78 51.4254
D 4,319.72 9,359.39 112,312.72 53.9965
E 4,535.71 9,827.37 117,928.46 56.6964
4461 Cultural Arts Technical Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,166.98 4,695.12 56,341.48 27.0873 B 2,275.31 4,929.84 59,158.06 28.4414
C 2,389.09 5,176.36 62,116.34 29.8636
D 2,508.53 5,435.15 65,221.78 31.3566
E 2,633.95 5,706.89 68,482.70 32.9244
3523 Cultural Arts Technical Supervisor* TMMBU A 3,097.74 6,711.77 80,541.24 38.7218 B 3,252.64 7,047.39 84,568.64 40.6580
C 3,415.26 7,399.73 88,796.76 42.6908
D 3,586.03 7,769.73 93,236.78 44.8254
E 3,765.34 8,158.24 97,898.84 47.0668
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 6

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
9552 D.A.R.E Officer LS A 36.3700
B 38.1900
C 40.1000
D 42.1000
E 44.2100
2571 Deputy City Attorney I* CONF A 4,944.78 10,713.69 128,564.28 61.8098 B 5,192.02 11,249.38 134,992.52 64.9003
C 5,451.63 11,811.87 141,742.38 68.1454
D 5,724.21 12,402.46 148,829.46 71.5526
E 6,010.41 13,022.56 156,270.66 75.1301
2572 Deputy City Attorney II* CONF A 5,439.27 11,785.09 141,421.02 67.9909 B 5,711.24 12,374.35 148,492.24 71.3905
C 5,996.80 12,993.07 155,916.80 74.9600
D 6,296.65 13,642.74 163,712.90 78.7081
E 6,611.47 14,324.85 171,898.22 82.6434
4116 Deputy City Clerk TTSSEA A 2,875.19 6,229.58 74,754.94 35.9399 B 3,018.96 6,541.08 78,492.96 37.7370
C 3,169.90 6,868.12 82,417.40 39.6238
D 3,328.41 7,211.56 86,538.66 41.6051
E 3,494.82 7,572.11 90,865.32 43.6853
1515 Director of Development Services * DH Min 7,359.88 15,946.41 191,356.86 91.9985 Max 8,944.42 19,379.57 232,554.86 111.8053
1522 Director of Finance* DH Min 6,866.78 14,878.03 178,536.32 85.8348 Max 8,339.89 18,069.77 216,837.24 104.2486
1518 Director of Human Resources* DH Min 6,866.78 14,878.03 178,536.32 85.8348 Max 8,339.89 18,069.77 216,837.19 104.2486
1527 Director of Housing and Mobility * DH Min 6,866.78 14,878.03 178,536.32 85.8348 Max 8,339.89 18,069.77 216,837.19 104.2486
1524 Director of Operations and Utilities* DH Min 7,359.88 15,946. 41 191,356. 86 91.9985 Max 8,944.
42 19,379.
57 232,554.
86 111.8053
1516 Dir
ector of Parks and Recreation* DH Min 6,866.78 14,878.03 178,536.32 85.8348 Max 8,339.89 18,069.77 216,837.19 104.2486
3208 Economic Development Mgmt Analyst I* TMMBU A 3,137.18 6,797.22 81,566.68 39.2148 B 3,294.03 7,137.07 85,644.78 41.1754
C 3,458.74 7,493.94 89,927.24 43.2343
D 3,631.67 7,868.62 94,423.42 45.3959
E 3,813.26 8,262.06 99,144.76 47.6658
3209 Economic Development Mgmt Analyst II* TMMBU A 3,607.67 7,816.62 93,799.42 45.0959 B 3,788.05 8,207.44 98,489.30 47.3506
C 3,977.45 8,617.81 103,413.70 49.7181
D 4,176.33 9,048.72 108,584.58 52.2041
E 4,385.15 9,501.16 114,013.90 54.8144
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 7

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3207 Economic Development Manager* TMMBU A 4,459.37 9,661.97 115,943.62 55.7421 B 4,682.34 10,145.07 121,740.84 58.5293
C 4,916.46 10,652.33 127,827.96 61.4558
D 5,162.28 11,184.94 134,219.28 64.5285
E 5,420.39 11,744.18 140,930.14 67.7549
5325 Electrician TEAMSTERS A 3,416.90 7,403.28 88,839.40 42.7113 B 3,587.76 7,773.48 93,281.76 44.8470
C 3,767.16 8,162.18 97,946.16 47.0895
D 3,955.50 8,570.25 102,843.00 49.4438
E 4,153.28 8,998.77 107,985.28 51.9160
5221 Engineering Technician I TEAMSTERS A 2,719.53 5,892.32 70,707.78 33.9941 B 2,855.50 6,186.92 74,243.00 35.6938
C 2,998.27 6,496.25 77,955.02 37.4784
D 3,148.18 6,821.06 81,852.68 39.3523
E 3,305.61 7,162.16 85,945.86 41.3201
5225 Engineering Technician II TEAMSTERS A 2,855.51 6,186.94 74,243.26 35.6939 B 2,998.29 6,496.30 77,955.54 37.4786
C 3,148.21 6,821.12 81,853.46 39.3526
D 3,305.64 7,162.22 85,946.64 41.3205
E 3,470.88 7,520.24 90,242.88 43.3860
3412 Environmental Compliance Analyst TMMBU A 3,137.18 6,797.22 81,566.68 39.2148 Non-Exempt B 3,294.03 7,137.07 85,644.78 41.1754
C 3,458.74 7,493.94 89,927.24 43.2343
D 3,631.67 7,868.62 94,423.42 45.3959
E 3,813.26 8,262.06 99,144.76 47.6658
5424 Environmental Compliance Technician TEAMSTERS A 2,471.96 5,355.92 64,270.98 30.8995 B 2,595.56 5,623.71 67,484.53 32.4445
C 2,725.34 5,904.90 70,858.76 34.0667
D 2,861.60 6,200.14 74,401.70 35.7700
E 3,004.68 6,510.15 78,121.78 37.5585
5313 Equipment Mechanic I TEAMSTERS A 2,499.33 5,415.22 64,982.58 31.2416 B 2,624.29 5,685.96 68,231.54 32.8036
C 2,755.50 5,970.25 71,643.00 34.4438
D 2,893.27 6,268.75 75,225.02 36.1659
E 3,037.93 6,582.18 78,986.18 37.9741
5314 Equipment Mechanic II TEAMSTERS A 2,624.28 5,685.94 68,231.28 32.8035 B 2,755.50 5,970.25 71,643.00 34.4438
C 2,893.26 6,268.73 75,224.76 36.1658
D 3,037.93 6,582.18 78,986.18 37.9741
E 3,189.82 6,911.28 82,935.32 39.8728
4108 Executive Assistant TTSSEA A 2,636.03 5,711.40 68,536.78 32.9504 B 2,767.83 5,996.97 71,963.58 34.5979
C 2,906.22 6,296.81 75,561.72 36.3278
D 3,051.54 6,611.67 79,340.04 38.1443
E 3,204.11 6,942.24 83,306.86 40.0514
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 8

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
8108 Executive Assistant - Confidential CONF A 2,701.40 5,853.03 70,236.40 33.7675 B 2,836.48 6,145.71 73,748.48 35.4560
C 2,978.30 6,452.98 77,435.80 37.2288
D 3,127.20 6,775.60 81,307.20 39.0900
E 3,283.57 7,114.40 85,372.82 41.0446
2581 Executive Assistant to City Manager CONF A 3,085.18 6,684.56 80,214.68 38.5648 B 3,239.43 7,018.77 84,225.18 40.4929
C 3,401.40 7,369.70 88,436.40 42.5175
D 3,571.48 7,738.21 92,858.48 44.6435
E 3,750.04 8,125.09 97,501.04 46.8755
9635 Facility Attendant LS A 19.8000
B 20.7900
C 21.8300
D 22.9200
E 24.0700
3404 Fleet Supervisor* TMMBU A 3,473.74 7,526.44 90,317.24 43.4218 B 3,647.41 7,902.72 94,832.66 45.5926
C 3,829.78 8,297.86 99,574.28 47.8723
D 4,021.26 8,712.73 104,552.76 50.2658
E 4,222.32 9,148.36 109,780.32 52.7790
3120 GIS Analyst * TMMBU A 3,607.67 7,816.62 93,799.42 45.0959 B 3,788.05 8,207.44 98,489.30 47.3506
C 3,977.45 8,617.81 103,413.70 49.7181
D 4,176.33 9,048.72 108,584.58 52.2041
E 4,385.15 9,501.16 114,013.90 54.8144
4206 GIS Technician TTSSEA A 2,920.43 6,327.60 75,931.18 36.5054 B 3,066.45 6,643.98 79,727.70 38.3306
C 3,219.79 6,976.21 83,714.54 40.2474
D 3,380.78 7,325.02 87,900.28 42.2598
E 3,549.80 7,691.23 92,294.80 44.3725
3215 Homeless Services Manager* TMMBU A 4,459.37 9,661.97 115,943.62 55.7421 B 4,682.34 10,145.07 121,740.84 58.5293
C 4,916.46 10,652.33 127,827.96 61.4558
D 5,162.28 11,184.94 134,219.28 64.5285
E 5,420.39 11,744.18 140,930.14 67.7549
2511 Human Resources Analyst I* CONF A 3,214.99 6,965.81 83,589.74 40.1874 B 3,375.74 7,314.10 87,769.24 42.1968
C 3,544.51 7,679.77 92,157.26 44.3064
D 3,721.74 8,063.77 96,765.24 46.5218
E 3,907.83 8,466.97 101,603.58 48.8479
2512 Human Resources Analyst II* CONF A 3,697.13 8,010.45 96,125.38 46.2141 B 3,881.99 8,410.98 100,931.74 48.5249
C 4,076.08 8,831.51 105,978.08 50.9510
D 4,279.90 9,273.12 111,277.40 53.4988
E 4,493.90 9,736.78 116,841.40 56.1738
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 9

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
2562 Human Resources Manager* CONF A 4,947.25 10,719.04 128,628.50 61.8406 B 5,194.61 11,254.99 135,059.86 64.9326
C 5,454.35 11,817.76 141,813.10 68.1794
D 5,727.07 12,408.65 148,903.82 71.5884
E 6,013.44 13,029.12 156,349.44 75.1680
4301 Human Resources Technician CONF A 2,743.19 5,943.58 71,322.94 34.2899 B 2,880.35 6,240.76 74,889.10 36.0044
C 3,024.37 6,552.80 78,633.62 37.8046
D 3,175.59 6,880.45 82,565.34 39.6949
E 3,334.37 7,224.47 86,693.62 41.6796
4204 Information Systems Technician I TTSSEA A 2,539.52 5,502.29 66,027.52 31.7440 B 2,666.49 5,777.40 69,328.74 33.3311
C 2,799.83 6,066.30 72,795.58 34.9979
D 2,939.82 6,369.61 76,435.32 36.7478
E 3,086.81 6,688.09 80,257.06 38.5851
4205 Information Systems Technician II TTSSEA A 2,920.43 6,327.60 75,931.18 36.5054 B 3,066.45 6,643.98 79,727.70 38.3306
C 3,219.79 6,976.21 83,714.54 40.2474
D 3,380.78 7,325.02 87,900.28 42.2598
E 3,549.80 7,691.23 92,294.80 44.3725
2553 Information Technology Manager* CONF A 4,947.25 10,719.04 128,628.50 61.8406 B 5,194.61 11,254.99 135,059.86 64.9326
C 5,454.35 11,817.76 141,813.10 68.1794
D 5,727.07 12,408.65 148,903.82 71.5884
E 6,013.44 13,029.12 156,349.44 75.1680
3111 Information Technology Specialist* TMMBU A 3,504.53 7,593.15 91,117.78 43.8066 B 3,679.78 7,972.86 95,674.28 45.9973
C 3,863.76 8,371.48 100,457.76 48.2970
D 4,056.93 8,790.02 105,480.18 50.7116
E 4,259.78 9,229.52 110,754.28 53.2473
5413 Instrumentation Technician TEAMSTERS A 3,172.41 6,873.56 82,482.66 39.6551 B 3,331.03 7,217.23 86,606.78 41.6379
C 3,497.59 7,578.11 90,937.34 43.7199
D 3,672.45 7,956.98 95,483.70 45.9056
E 3,856.08 8,354.84 100,258.08 48.2010
9108 Intern-Generalist LS A 20.5500
B 21.5800
C 22.6600
D 23.7900
E 24.9800
5224 Junior Engineer TEAMSTERS A 3,140.61 6,804.66 81,655.86 39.2576 B 3,297.64 7,144.89 85,738.64 41.2205
C 3,462.51 7,502.11 90,025.26 43.2814
D 3,635.64 7,877.22 94,526.64 45.4455
E 3,817.43 8,271.10 99,253.18 47.7179
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 10

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
5423 Laboratory Quality Assurance Officer* TMMBU A 2,914.59 6,314.95 75,779.34 36.4324 B 3,060.34 6,630.74 79,568.84 38.2543
C 3,213.35 6,962.26 83,547.10 40.1669
D 3,374.01 7,310.36 87,724.26 42.1751
E 3,542.72 7,675.89 92,110.72 44.2840
5421 Laboratory Technician I TEAMSTERS A 2,467.86 5,347.03 64,164.36 30.8483 B 2,591.23 5,614.33 67,371.98 32.3904
C 2,720.82 5,895.11 70,741.32 34.0103
D 2,856.85 6,189.84 74,278.10 35.7106
E 2,999.68 6,499.31 77,991.68 37.4960
5422 Laboratory Technician II TEAMSTERS A 2,579.16 5,588.18 67,058.16 32.2395 B 2,708.12 5,867.59 70,411.12 33.8515
C 2,843.53 6,160.98 73,931.78 35.5441
D 2,985.70 6,469.02 77,628.20 37.3213
E 3,134.98 6,792.46 81,509.48 39.1873
3508 Landscape Architect* TMMBU A 3,968.44 8,598.29 103,179.44 49.6055 B 4,166.85 9,028.18 108,338.10 52.0856
C 4,375.19 9,479.58 113,754.94 54.6899
D 4,593.95 9,953.56 119,442.70 57.4244
E 4,823.67 10,451.29 125,415.42 60.2959
4109 Legal Secretary CONF A 2,946.50 6,384.08 76,609.00 36.8313 B 3,093.82 6,703.28 80,439.32 38.6728
C 3,248.52 7,038.46 84,461.52 40.6065
D 3,410.95 7,390.39 88,684.70 42.6369
E 3,581.50 7,759.92 93,119.00 44.7688
9636 Lifeguard LS A 15.0000
B 15.7500
C 16.5400
D 17.3600
E 18.2300
9303 Maintenance Aide LS A 17.4500
B 18.3200
C 19.2300
D 20.1900
E 21.2000
5301 Maintenance Worker I TEAMSTERS A 1,839.58 3,985.76 47,829.08 22.9948 B 1,931.57 4,185.07 50,220.82 24.1446
C 2,028.14 4,394.30 52,731.64 25.3518
D 2,129.55 4,614.03 55,368.30 26.6194
E 2,236.03 4,844.73 58,136.78 27.9504
5303 Maintenance Worker II TEAMSTERS A 2,336.62 5,062.68 60,752.12 29.2078 B 2,453.45 5,315.81 63,789.70 30.6681
C 2,576.11 5,581.57 66,978.86 32.2014
D 2,704.91 5,860.64 70,327.66 33.8114
E 2,840.15 6,153.66 73,843.90 35.5019
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 11

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3151 Management Analyst I* TMMBU A 3,137.18 6,797.22 81,566.68 39.2148 B 3,294.03 7,137.07 85,644.78 41.1754
C 3,458.74 7,493.94 89,927.24 43.2343
D 3,631.67 7,868.62 94,423.42 45.3959
E 3,813.26 8,262.06 99,144.76 47.6658
3152 Management Analyst II* TMMBU A 3,607.67 7,816.62 93,799.42 45.0959 B 3,788.05 8,207.44 98,489.30 47.3506
C 3,977.45 8,617.81 103,413.70 49.7181
D 4,176.33 9,048.72 108,584.58 52.2041
E 4,385.15 9,501.16 114,013.90 54.8144
4463 Marketing Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,580.47 5,591.02 67,092.22 32.2559 B 2,709.51 5,870.61 70,447.26 33.8689
C 2,844.97 6,164.10 73,969.22 35.5621
D 2,987.22 6,472.31 77,667.72 37.3403
E 3,136.58 6,795.92 81,551.08 39.2073
1101 Mayor* 478.15 1,036.00 12,432.00
3527 Media Services Supervisor TMMBU A 3,097.74 6,711.77 80,541.24 38.7218 Non-Exempt B 3,252.64 7,047.39 84,568.64 40.6580
C 3,415.26 7,399.73 88,796.76 42.6908
D 3,586.03 7,769.73 93,236.78 44.8254
E 3,765.34 8,158.24 97,898.84 47.0668
5531 Meter Reader TEAMSTERS A 1,593.97 3,453.60 41,443.22 19.9246 B 1,673.66 3,626.26 43,515.16 20.9208
C 1,757.34 3,807.57 45,690.84 21.9668
D 1,845.20 3,997.93 47,975.20 23.0650
E 1,937.47 4,197.85 50,374.22 24.2184
4212 Multimedia Communications Assistant TTSSEA A 2,166.98 4,695.12 56,341.48 27.0873 B 2,275.31 4,929.84 59,158.06 28.4414
C 2,389.09 5,176.36 62,116.34 29.8636
D 2,508.53 5,435.15 65,221.78 31.3566
E 2,633.95 5,706.89 68,482.70 32.9244
4210 Multimedia Communications Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,580.47 5,591.02 67,092.22 32.2559 B 2,709.51 5,870.61 70,447.26 33.8689
C 2,844.97 6,164.10 73,969.22 35.5621
D 2,987.22 6,472.31 77,667.72 37.3403
E 3,136.58 6,795.92 81,551.08 39.2073
4105 Office Assistant TTSSEA A 1,774.36 3,844.45 46,133.36 22.1795 B 1,863.06 4,036.63 48,439.56 23.2883
C 1,956.23 4,238.50 50,861.98 24.4529
D 2,054.05 4,450.44 53,405.30 25.6756
E 2,156.75 4,672.96 56,075.50 26.9594
1107 Parks Commissioner Stipend of $50.00 per meeting
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 12

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3509 Parks Planning & Development TMMBU A 3,968.44 8,598.29 103,179.44 49.6055 Manager* B 4,166.85 9,028.18 108,338.10 52.0856
C 4,375.19 9,479.58 113,754.94 54.6899
D 4,593.95 9,953.56 119,442.70 57.4244
E 4,823.67 10,451.29 125,415.42 60.2959
3507 Parks Project Coordinator* TMMBU A 3,450.31 7,475.67 89,708.06 43.1289 B 3,622.83 7,849.47 94,193.58 45.2854
C 3,803.98 8,241.96 98,903.48 47.5498
D 3,994.18 8,654.06 103,848.68 49.9273
E 4,193.88 9,086.74 109,040.88 52.4235
3306 Plan Check Engineer* TMMBU A 4,831.29 10,467.80 125,613.54 60.3911 B 5,072.85 10,991.18 131,894.10 63.4106
C 5,326.50 11,540.75 138,489.00 66.5813
D 5,592.83 12,117.80 145,413.58 69.9104
E 5,872.47 12,723.69 152,684.22 73.4059
5214 Plan Examiner I TEAMSTERS A 3,322.07 7,197.82 86,373.82 41.5259 B 3,488.21 7,557.79 90,693.46 43.6026
C 3,662.61 7,935.66 95,227.86 45.7826
D 3,845.72 8,332.39 99,988.72 48.0715
E 4,038.03 8,749.07 104,988.78 50.4754
5215 Plan Examiner II TEAMSTERS A 3,496.92 7,576.66 90,919.92 43.7115 B 3,671.80 7,955.57 95,466.80 45.8975
C 3,855.37 8,353.30 100,239.62 48.1921
D 4,048.13 8,770.95 105,251.38 50.6016
E 4,250.56 9,209.55 110,514.56 53.1320
1106 Planning Commissioner Stipend of $50.00 per meeting 4506 Planning Technician TTSSEA A 2,676.79 5,799.71 69,596.54 33.4599 B 2,810.65 6,089.74 73,076.90 35.1331
C 2,951.17 6,394.20 76,730.42 36.8896
D 3,098.74 6,713.94 80,567.24 38.7343
E 3,253.69 7,049.66 84,595.94 40.6711
6212 Police Captain* TPMA A 6,080.69 13,174.83 158,097.94 76.0086 B 6,384.73 13,833.58 166,002.98 79.8091
C 6,703.95 14,525.23 174,302.70 83.7994
D 7,039.15 15,251.49 183,017.90 87.9894
E 7,391.15 16,014.16 192,169.90 92.3894
1513 Police Chief* DH Min 7,818.77 16,940.67 203,288.08 97.7346 Max 9,503.80 20,591.57 247,098.82 118.7975
4603 Police Community Relations Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,580.47 5,591.02 67,092.22 32.2559 B 2,709.51 5,870.61 70,447.26 33.8689
C 2,844.97 6,164.10 73,969.22 35.5621
D 2,987.22 6,472.31 77,667.72 37.3403
E 3,136.58 6,795.92 81,551.08 39.2073
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 13

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
6103 Police Corporal TPOA A 3,864.76 8,373.65 100,483.76 48.3095 B 4,058.01 8,792.36 105,508.26 50.7251
C 4,260.91 9,231.97 110,783.66 53.2614
D 4,473.97 9,693.60 116,323.22 55.9246
E 4,697.67 10,178.29 122,139.42 58.7209
4604 Police Homeless Outreach Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,580. 47 5,591.02 67,092. 22 32.2559 B 2,709.
51 5,870.61 70,447.
26 33.8689
C 2,844.
97 6,164.10 73,969.
22 35.5621
D 2,987.
22 6,472.31 77,667.
72 37.3403
E 3,136.
58 6,795.92 81,551.
08 39.2073
9501 Poli
ce Intern/Parking Enforcement LS A 19.5000
Officer B 20.4800
C 21.5000
D 22.5700
E 23.7000
6211 Police Lieutenant* TPMA A 5,262.69 11,402.50 136,829.94 65.7836 B 5,525.82 11,972.61 143,671.32 69.0728
C 5,802.12 12,571.26 150,855.12 72.5265
D 6,092.22 13,199.81 158,397.72 76.1528
E 6,396.83 13,859.80 166,317.58 79.9604
6102 Police Officer TPOA A 3,513.42 7,612.41 91,348.92 43.9178 B 3,689.09 7,993.03 95,916.34 46.1136
C 3,873.55 8,392.69 100,712.30 48.4194
D 4,067.25 8,812.38 105,748.50 50.8406
E 4,270.61 9,252.99 111,035.86 53.3826
9517 Police Range Master LS A 31.1700
B 32.7300
C 34.3600
D 36.0800
E 37.8800
4103 Po
lice Records Assistant I TTSSEA A 2,199.60 4,765.80 57,189.60 27.4950 B 2,309.59 5,004.11 60,049.34 28.8699
C 2,425.08 5,254.34 63,052.08 30.3135
D 2,546.31 5,517.01 66,204.06 31.8289
E 2,673.63 5,792.87 69,514.38 33.4204
4104 Police Records Assistant II TTSSEA A 2,309.56 5,004.05 60,048.56 28.8695 B 2,425.06 5,254.30 63,051.56 30.3133
C 2,546.28 5,516.94 66,203.28 31.8285
D 2,673.60 5,792.80 69,513.60 33.4200
E 2,807.29 6,
082.46 72,989.54 35.0911
3626 Police Records Supervisor* TMMBU A 3,152.78 6,831.02 81,972.28 39.4098 B 3,310.43 7,172.60 86,071.18 41.3804
C 3,475.94 7,531.20 90,374.44 43.4493
D 3,649.75 7,907.79 94,893.50 45.6219
E 3,832.22 8,303.14 99,637.72 47.9028
9551 Police Reserve LS A 40.5500
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 14

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
6105 Police Sergeant TPOA A 4,233.88 9,173.41 110,080.88 52.9235 B 4,445.59 9,632.11 115,585.34 55.5699
C 4,667.88 10,113.74 121,364.88 58.3485
D 4,901.27 10,619.42 127,433.02 61.2659
E 5,146.33 11,150.38 133,804.58 64.3291
2712 Police Support Operations Manager* CONF A 5,599.57 12,132.40 145,588.82 69.9946 B 5,879.56 12,739.05 152,868.56 73.4945
C 6,173.52 13,375.96 160,511.52 77.1690
D 6,482.19 14,044.75 168,536.94 81.0274
E 6,806.31 14,747.01 176,964.06 85.0789
4701 Police Support Services Technician TTSSEA A 2,676.79 5,799.71 69,596.54 33.4599 B 2,810.65 6,089.74 73,076.90 35.1331
C 2,951.17 6,394.20 76,730.42 36.8896
D 3,098.74 6,713.94 80,567.24 38.7343
E 3,253.69 7,049.66 84,595.94 40.6711
6101 Police Trainee (Non-Sworn) TPOA A 3,055.05 6,619.28 79,431.30 38.1881 9638 Pool Manager LS A 21.3100
B 22.3800
C 23.4900
D 24.6700
E 25.9000
9533 Professional Standards Officer LS A 51.9500
B 54.5500
C 57.2800
D 60.1400
E 63.1500
9110 Program Assistant LS Min 15.0000
Max 25.8200
9231 Project Specialist I LS Min 15.0000
Max 50.0100
9232 Project Specialist II LS Min 50.0200
Max 140.9900
5518 Property and Evidence Technician TEAMSTERS A 2,372.18 5,139.72 61,676.68 29.6523 B 2,490.78 5,396.69 64,760.28 31.1348
C 2,615.33 5,666.55 67,998.58 32.6916
D 2,746.10 5,949.88 71,398.60 34.3263
E 2,883.39 6,247.35 74,968.14 36.0424
2585 Public Information Officer* CONF A 3,697.13 8,010.45 96,125.38 46.2141 B 3,881.99 8,410.98 100,931.74 48.5249
C 4,076.08 8,831.51 105,978.08 50.9510
D 4,279.90 9,273.12 111,277.40 53.4988
E 4,493.90 9,736.78 116,841.40 56.1738
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 15

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3623 Public Safety Dispatch Supervisor* TMMBU A 3,345.82 7,249.28 86,991.32 41.8228 B 3,513.10 7,611.72 91,340.60 43.9138
C 3,688.77 7,992.34 95,908.02 46.1096
D 3,873.20 8,391.93 100,703.20 48.4150
E 4,066.87 8,811.55 105,738.62 50.8359
5502 Public Safety Dispatcher I TEAMSTERS A 2,740.56 5,937.88 71,254.56 34.2570 B 2,877.57 6,234.74 74,816.82 35.9696
C 3,021.45 6,546.48 78,557.70 37.7681
D 3,172.52 6,873.79 82,485.52 39.6565
E 3,331.17 7,217.54 86,610.42 41.6396
5503 Public Safety Dispatcher II TEAMSTERS A 3,006.61 6,514.32 78,171.86 37.5826 B 3,156.93 6,840.02 82,080.18 39.4616
C 3,314.79 7,182.05 86,184.54 41.4349
D 3,480.52 7,541.13 90,493.52 43.5065
E 3,654.55 7,918.19 95,018.30 45.6819
9512 Public Safety Dispatcher II - Per Diem LS A 33.1100 B 34.7700
C 36.5100
D 38.3300
E 40.2500
3401 Public Works Superintendent* TMMBU A 4,169.06 9,032.96 108,395.56 52.1133 B 4,377.52 9,484.63 113,815.52 54.7190
C 4,596.40 9,958.87 119,506.40 57.4550
D 4,826.22 10,456.81 125,481.72 60.3278
E 5,067.52 10,979.63 131,755.52 63.3440
3405 Public Works Supervisor* TMMBU A 3,473.74 7,526.44 90,317.24 43.4218 B 3,647.41 7,902.72 94,832.66 45.5926
C 3,829.78 8,297.86 99,574.28 47.8723
D 4,021.26 8,712.73 104,552.76 50.2658
E 4,222.32 9,148.36 109,780.32 52.7790
3214 Real Property Agent* TMMBU A 3,450.31 7,475.67 89,708.06 43.1289 B 3,622.83 7,849.47 94,193.58 45.2854
C 3,803.98 8,241.96 98,903.48 47.5498
D 3,994.18 8,654.06 103,848.68 49.9273
E 4,193.88 9,086.74 109,040.88 52.4235
9631 Recreation Leader I LS A 15.0000
B 15.7500
C 16.5400
D 17.3600
E 18.2300
9632 Recreation Leader II LS A 18.7900
B 19.7300
C 20.7200
D 21.7500
E 22.8400
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 16

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
9633 Recreation Leader III LS A 21.3100
B 22.3800
C 23.4900
D 24.6900
E 25.9000
4401 Recreation Program Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,580.47 5,591.02 67,092.22 32.2559 B 2,709.51 5,870.61 70,447.26 33.8689
C 2,844.97 6,164.10 73,969.22 35.5621
D 2,987.22 6,472.31 77,667.72 37.3403
E 3,136.58 6,795.92 81,551.08 39.2073
3513 Recreation Services Manager* TMMBU A 4,104.66 8,893.43 106,721.16 51.3083 B 4,309.91 9,338.14 112,057.66 53.8739
C 4,525.40 9,805.03 117,660.40 56.5675
D 4,751.68 10,295.31 123,543.68 59.3960
E 4,989.26 10,810.06 129,720.76 62.3658
3505 Recreation Services Supervisor* TMMBU A 3,731.53 8,084.98 97,019.78 46.6441 B 3,918.11 8,489.24 101,870.86 48.9764
C 4,114.02 8,913.71 106,964.52 51.4253
D 4,319.71 9,359.37 112,312.46 53.9964
E 4,535.69 9,827.33 117,927.94 56.6961
9626 Recreation Specialized Instructor LS Min 15.0000
Max 53.2100
4113 Senior Account Clerk TTSSEA A 2,399.11 5,198.07 62,376.86 29.9889 B 2,519.06 5,457.96 65,495.56 31.4883
C 2,645.02 5,730.88 68,770.52 33.0628
D 2,777.28 6,017.44 72,209.28 34.7160
E 2,916.13 6,318.28 75,819.38 36.4516
3105 Senior Accountant* TMMBU A 3,877.74 8,401.77 100,821.24 48.4718 B 4,071.64 8,821.89 105,862.64 50.8955
C 4,275.22 9,262.98 111,155.72 53.4403
D 4,488.99 9,726.15 116,713.74 56.1124
E 4,713.44 10,212.45 122,549.44 58.9180
4202 Senior Accounting Technician TTSSEA A 3,110.93 6,740.35 80,884.18 38.8866 B 3,266.48 7,077.37 84,928.48 40.8310
C 3,429.82 7,431.28 89,175.32 42.8728
D 3,601.31 7,802.84 93,634.06 45.0164
E 3,781.39 8,193.01 98,316.14 47.2674
5323 Senior Building Maintenance Worker TEAMSTERS A 2,637.49 5,714.56 68,574.74 32.9686 B 2,769.35 6,000.26 72,003.10 34.6169
C 2,907.81 6,300.26 75,603.06 36.3476
D 3,053.22 6,615.31 79,383.72 38.1653
E 3,205.90 6,946.12 83,353.40 40.0738
3304 Senior Civil Engineer* TMMBU A 4,831.42 10,468.08 125,616.92 60.3928 B 5,072.99 10,991.48 131,897.74 63.4124
C 5,326.65 11,541.08 138,492.90 66.5831
D 5,592.98 12,118.12 145,417.48 69.9123
E 5,872.63 12,724.03 152,688.38 73.4079
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 17

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
5315 Senior Equipment Mechanic TEAMSTERS A 2,755.51 5,970.27 71,643.26 34.4439 B 2,893.27 6,268.75 75,225.02 36.1659
C 3,037.94 6,582.20 78,986.44 37.9743
D 3,189.83 6,911.30 82,935.58 39.8729
E 3,349.32 7,256.86 87,082.32 41.8665
4208 Senior Information Systems Technician TTSSEA A 3,212.47 6,960.35 83,524.22 40.1559 B 3,373.10 7,308.38 87,700.60 42.1638
C 3,541.76 7,673.81 92,085.76 44.2720
D 3,718.85 8,057.51 96,690.10 46.4856
E 3,904.78 8,460.36 101,524.28 48.8098
9637 Senior Lifeguard LS A 18.7900
B 19.7300
C 20.7200
D 21.7500
E 22.8400
5305 Senior Maintenance Worker TEAMSTERS A 2,572.37 5,573.47 66,881.62 32.1546 B 2,700.97 5,852.10 70,225.22 33.7621
C 2,836.02 6,144.71 73,736.52 35.4503
D 2,977.83 6,451.97 77,423.58 37.2229
E 3,126.71 6,774.54 81,294.46 39.0839
3203 Senior Planner* TMMBU A 4,141.65 8,973.58 107,682.90 51.7706 B 4,348.73 9,422.25 113,066.98 54.3591
C 4,566.18 9,893.39 118,720.68 57.0773
D 4,794.49 10,388.06 124,656.74 59.9311
E 5,034.21 10,907.46 130,889.46 62.9276
4410 Senior Police Records Assistant TTSSEA A 2,540.52 5,504.46 66,053.52 31.7565 B 2,667.57 5,779.74 69,356.82 33.3446
C 2,800.91 6,068.64 72,823.66 35.0114
D 2,940.96 6,372.08 76,464.96 36.7620
E 3,088.01 6,690.69 80,288.26 38.6001
5520 Senior Property & Evidence Technician TEAMSTERS A 2609.39 5653.68 67844.14 32.6174 B 2739.86 5936.36 71236.36 34.2483
C 2876.86 6233.20 74798.36 35.9608
D 3020.70 6544.85 78538.20 37.7588
E 3171.73 6872.08 82464.98 39.6466
5504 Senior Public Safety Dispatcher TEAMSTERS A 3,156.93 6,840.02 82,080.18 39.4616 B 3,314.79 7,182.05 86,184.54 41.4349
C 3,480.52 7,541.13 90,493.52 43.5065
D 3,654.55 7,918.19 95,018.30 45.6819
E 3,837.30 8,314.15 99,769.80 47.9663
5356 Senior Utilities Worker TEAMSTERS A 2,701.47 5,853.19 70,238.22 33.7684 B 2,836.42 6,145.58 73,746.92 35.4553
C 2,978.16 6,452.68 77,432.16 37.2270
D 3,127.53 6,776.32 81,315.78 39.0941
E 3,282.85 7,112.84 85,354.10 41.0356
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 18

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3343 Supervising Building Inspector* TMMBU A 3,968.44 8,598.29 103,179.44 49.6055 B 4,166.85 9,028.18 108,338.10 52.0856
C 4,375.19 9,479.58 113,754.94 54.6899
D 4,593.95 9,953.56 119,442.70 57.4244
E 4,823.67 10,451.29 125,415.42 60.2959
3345 Supervising Construction Inspector TMMBU A 3,865.09 8,374.36 100,492.34 48.3136 Non-Exempt B 4,058.34 8,793.07 105,516.84 50.7293
C 4,261.26 9,232.73 110,792.76 53.2658
D 4,474.31 9,694.34 116,332.06 55.9289
E 4,698.03 10,179.07 122,148.78 58.7254
3117 System Administrator* TMMBU A 3,607.67 7,816.62 93,799.42 45.0959 B 3,788.05 8,207.44 98,489.30 47.3506
C 3,977.45 8,617.81 103,413.70 49.7181
D 4,176.33 9,048.72 108,584.58 52.2041
E 4,385.15 9,501.16 114,013.90 54.8144
9361 Theatre Technician LS A 29.7100
B 31.1900
C 32.7500
D 34.3900
E 36.1100
4420 Transit Coordinator TTSSEA A 2,580.47 5,591.02 67,092.22 32.2559 B 2,709.51 5,870.61 70,447.26 33.8689
C 2,844.97 6,164.10 73,969.22 35.5621
D 2,987.22 6,472.31 77,667.72 37.3403
E 3,136.58 6,795.92 81,551.08 39.2073
3515 Transit Manager* TMMBU A 4,019.01 8,707.86 104,494.26 50.2376 B 4,219.94 9,143.20 109,718.44 52.7493
C 4,430.96 9,600.41 115,204.96 55.3870
D 4,652.49 10,080.40 120,964.74 58.1561
E 4,885.11 10,584.41 127,012.86 61.0639
1109 Transportation Commissioner Stipend of $50.00 per meeting 3424 Utilities Laboratory Superintendent* TMMBU A 4,169.06 9,032.96 108,395.56 52.1133 B 4,377.52 9,484.63 113,815.52 54.7190
C 4,596.40 9,958.87 119,506.40 57.4550
D 4,826.22 10,456.81 125,481.72 60.3278
E 5,067.52 10,979.63 131,755.52 63.3440
5350 Utilities Worker I TEAMSTERS A 1,930.84 4,183.49 50,201.84 24.1355 B 2,027.60 4,393.13 52,717.60 25.3450
C 2,128.59 4,611.95 55,343.34 26.6074
D 2,235.53 4,843.65 58,123.78 27.9441
E 2,348.41 5,088.22 61,058.66 29.3551
5353 Utilities Worker II TEAMSTERS A 2,452.80 5,314.40 63,772.80 30.6600 B 2,575.87 5,581.05 66,972.62 32.1984
C 2,704.02 5,858.71 70,304.52 33.8003
D 2,839.81 6,152.92 73,835.06 35.4976
E 2,981.55 6,460.03 77,520.30 37.2694
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 19

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
3403 Utility Line Maintenance Superintendent* TMMBU A 4,247.72 9,203.39 110,440.72 53.0965 B 4,460.09 9,663.53 115,962.34 55.7511
C 4,683.10 10,146.72 121,760.60 58.5388
D 4,917.25 10,654.04 127,848.50 61.4656
E 5,163.11 11,186.74 134,240.86 64.5389
3423 Utility Maintenance Superintendent* TMMBU A 4,326.34 9,373.74 112,484.84 54.0793 B 4,542.65 9,842.41 118,108.90 56.7831
C 4,769.78 10,334.52 124,014.28 59.6223
D 5,008.27 10,851.25 130,215.02 62.6034
E 5,258.68 11,393.81 136,725.68 65.7335
3410 Utility Maintenance Supervisor* TMMBU A 3,605.27 7,811.42 93,737.02 45.0659 B 3,785.54 8,202.00 98,424.04 47.3193
C 3,974.81 8,612.09 103,345.06 49.6851
D 4,173.56 9,042.71 108,512.56 52.1695
E 4,382.24 9,494.85 113,938.24 54.7780
5411 Utility Mechanic I TEAMSTERS A 2,889.68 6,260.97 75,131.68 36.1210 B 3,034.16 6,574.01 78,888.16 37.9270
C 3,185.86 6,902.70 82,832.36 39.8233
D 3,345.16 7,247.85 86,974.16 41.8145
E 3,512.41 7,610.22 91,322.66 43.9051
5412 Utility Mechanic II TEAMSTERS A 2,961.90 6,417.45 77,009.40 37.0238 B 3,110.00 6,738.33 80,860.00 38.8750
C 3,265.50 7,075.25 84,903.00 40.8188
D 3,428.77 7,429.00 89,148.02 42.8596
E 3,600.21 7,800.46 93,605.46 45.0026
5404 Utility Operator TEAMSTERS A 3,463.00 7,503.17 90,038.00 43.2875 B 3,636.12 7,878.26 94,539.12 45.4515
C 3,817.94 8,272.20 99,266.44 47.7243
D 4,008.84 8,685.82 104,229.84 50.1105
E 4,209.28 9,120.11 109,441.28 52.6160
3422 Wastewater Operations Superintendent* TMMBU A 4,326.34 9,373.74 112,484.84 54.0793 B 4,542.65 9,842.41 118,108.90 56.7831
C 4,769.78 10,334.52 124,014.28 59.6223
D 5,008.27 10,851.25 130,215.02 62.6034
E 5,258.68 11,393.81 136,725.68 65.7335
5405 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator I TEAMSTERS A 2,738.70 5,933.85 71,206.20 34.2338 B 2,875.62 6,230.51 74,766.12 35.9453
C 3,019.40 6,542.03 78,504.40 37.7425
D 3,170.38 6,869.16 82,429.88 39.6298
E 3,328.91 7,212.64 86,551.66 41.6114
5406 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator II TEAMSTERS A 2,882.85 6,246.18 74,954.10 36.0356 B 3,026.96 6,558.41 78,700.96 37.8370
C 3,178.32 6,886.36 82,636.32 39.7290
D 3,337.25 7,230.71 86,768.50 41.7156
E 3,504.12 7,592.26 91,107.12 43.8015
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 20

ATTACHMENT C
City of Tracy
Master Salary Schedule
Effective 12/11/2022
Class
Code Position Title Unit Step Bi-Weekly
Salary
Monthly
Salary
Annual
Salary
Hourly
Rate
5407 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator III TEAMSTERS A 3,034.58 6,574.92 78,899.08 37.9323 B 3,186.27 6,903.59 82,843.02 39.8284
C 3,345.60 7,248.80 86,985.60 41.8200
D 3,512.90 7,611.28 91,335.40 43.9113
E 3,688.54 7,991.84 95,902.04 46.1068
3421 Water Operations Superintendent* TMMBU A 4,247.72 9,203.39 110,440.72 53.0965 B 4,460.09 9,663.53 115,962.34 55.7511
C 4,683.10 10,146.72 121,760.60 58.5388
D 4,917.25 10,654.04 127,848.50 61.4656
E 5,163.11 11,186.74 134,240.86 64.5389
9351 Water Patrol Aide LS A 17.7000
B 18.5900
C 19.5100
D 20.4900
E 21.5100
3415 Water Resources and Compliance Manager TMMBU A 4,019.01 8,707.86 104,494.26 50.2376 B 4,219.94 9,143.20 109,718.44 52.7493
C 4,430.96 9,600.41 115,204.96 55.3870
D 4,652.49 10,080.40 120,964.74 58.1561
E 4,885.11 10,584.41 127,012.86 61.0639
5401 Water Treatment Plant Operator I TEAMSTERS A 2,917.87 6,322.05 75,864.62 36.4734 B 3,063.77 6,638.17 79,658.02 38.2971
C 3,216.96 6,970.08 83,640.96 40.2120
D 3,377.80 7,318.57 87,822.80 42.2225
E 3,546.68 7,684.47 92,213.68 44.3335
5402 Water Treatment Plant Operator II TEAMSTERS A 3,071.44 6,654.79 79,857.44 38.3930 B 3,225.02 6,987.54 83,850.52 40.3128
C 3,386.28 7,336.94 88,043.28 42.3285
D 3,555.58 7,703.76 92,445.08 44.4448
E 3,733.36 8,088.95 97,067.36 46.6670
5403 Water Treatment Plant Operator III TEAMSTERS A 3,233.10 7,005.05 84,060.60 40.4138 B 3,394.76 7,355.31 88,263.76 42.4345
C 3,564.50 7,723.08 92,677.00 44.5563
D 3,742.72 8,109.23 97,310.72 46.7840
E 3,929.85 8,514.68 102,176.10 49.1231
Employees marked with an * (asterisk) are salaried 21

ATTACHMENT C

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

TRACY CITY COUNCIL
RESOLU
TION NO. _______________

AUTHORI
ZING 1) AMENDMENTS TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
DATED DECEMBER 13, 2021, BETWEEN MICHAEL ROGERS AND THE CITY OF TRACY TO REFLECT A MERIT INCREASE OF 6% FOR AN ANNUAL BASE SALARY OF $286,536 AND OTHER INCREASES TO TOTAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS , AND 2) AMENDING THE MASTER SALARY SCHEDULE RELATING TO THE CITY MANAGER, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 11, 2022 , TO

REFLECT SUCH AMENDMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Tracy approved an Empl oyment Agreement with Michael Rogers on December 7, 2021 to hire Michael Rogers as its City Manager (Employment Agreement); and WHEREAS, as the one-year employment anniversary for Mr. Rogers is approaching, the City Council conducted performance evaluations for Mr. Rogers in November 2022; and WHEREAS, based on the evaluations and a determination of outstanding performance, the City Council desires to provide Mr. Rogers a merit increase of 6% for an increased annual base salary of $286,536, effective December 11, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to provide additional increases to the total compensation and benefits for Mr. Rogers to include: a car allowance of $700 per month, prorated per pay period, a
housing allowance increase from $750 to $1,000 per month, prorated per pay period; an increase to vacation accrual from 160 hours to 200 hours vacation accrual per year through December 12, 2026, and the cost and time to attend an annual executive physical examination, e
ffective December 11, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments a re reflected i n the A mended E mployment Agreement shown in Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, the Public Employees’ Retirement Law governs the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) codified in Title 2 of the California Code of Regul
ations. Section 570.5 of the California Code of Regulations requires City Council to approve the rate of pay or classification titles in a public available pay schedule for employees who are members of CalPERS; and
WHEREAS, State law requires that the City Council approve a Master Salary Schedule reflecting the salaries of all personnel and the proposed amendments to the Employment Agreement are reflected in the Proposed Master Salary Scheduled shown in Attachment C; and now therefore be it;
RESOLVED: The City Council of the City of Tracy hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals
are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein as findings and determinations of the City; and be it further
Resolution 2022-_____

RESOLVED: That the City Council hereby approves and authorizes the execution of the the Amended Employment Agreement between Michael Rogers and the City of Tracy relating to compensation and benefits effective December 11, 2022, as shown on Attachment A; and be it further
RESOLVED: That the City Council hereby authorizes amendments to the City’s Master Salary Schedule, as set forth in the Proposed Master Salary Scheduled shown in Attachment C,
to increase the salary of the City Manager position effective December 11, 2022; and be it further
RESOLVED: That the Proposed Master Salary Schedule shall become effective December 11, 2022.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The foregoing Resolution 2022-_____ was adopted by the Tracy City Council on the 6th day of December, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTENTION: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________________
NANCY D. YOUNG
Mayor of the City of Tracy, California
ATTEST:

ADRIANNE RICHARDSON
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Tracy, California
December 6, 2022
Agenda Item 3.F

RECOMME

NDATION
Staff r
ecommends that City Council 1) adopt a resolution approving the City’s response to the 2021/2022 San Joaquin County Grand Jury Report on Cybersecurity , Case No. 0321 (2021/2022), and 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the Response Letter.

EXECUTI

VE SUMMARY
On June 15,
2022, the San Joaquin County Civil Grand Jury (Grand Jury) released its final consolidated yearly report. The Grand Jury Report examines and investigates local governmental activities within San Joaquin County and identified problem areas that local municipals should address. The 2021/2022 San Joaquin Grand Jury studied Cybersecurity. As part of this investigative report, the City is required to respond to the Grand Jury’s findings and recommendations regarding the cybersecurity issues identified in the report.

State law requires the City to respond to the Grand Jury’s findings and recommendations.

Typically, staff drafts responses to grand jury reports and presents them to the Council for approval prior to submitting them to the Presiding Judge of San Joaquin County Superior Court.

Staff requests that the City Council review the draft response letter and provide feedback to finalize it. This item further requests that the Council authorizes the Mayor to sign the final response letter on behalf of the Council.

BACKG

ROUND AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
The Grand Ju
ry reviewed cybersecurity practices of the City of Tracy along with the other six incorporated cities in San Joaquin County to see if they were exercising due diligence in protecting information resources. The Grand Jury published a report on June 15, 2022. “The Grand Jury concluded that San Joaquin County (SJC) has mature and robust security policies and systems. The County’s security architecture provided a model in evaluating each city’s systems.” A copy of the full report is attached as Attachment A. As to the City of Tracy, the report contained three findings and three recommendations addressing potential weaknesses in the City’s cybersecurity defense. The City has either complied with the recommendation or is currently in the process of completing the recommended disaster preparedness plans. A copy of the City’s response is attached as Attachment B.

The firs
t finding noted that the City did not have a policy requiring the use of encrypted thumb drives use on City devices. In October 2022, the City adopted an administration policy requiring encryption of thumb drives used on City devices. The second finding noted that City needed to develop, adopt, and implement a formal Business Continuity Plan. The City is in the process of completing the Business Continuity Plan, which will include a component regarding responding to a cybersecurity threat and response. Staff plans to bring this Business Continuity Plan before City Council next year. The third recommendation noted that City needed to develop, adopt, and implement a formal Disaster Preparation Plan. The City is in the process of completing the Disaster Preparation Plan, which will include a component regarding responding to a Agenda Item 3.F
December 6, 2022

cybersecurity threat and response. The Disaster Preparation Plan will also be brought before City Council next year.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

COORDINATION
The Innovation and Technology Department coordinated with the Risk Management Division to develop the cybersecurity policies r ecommended in the Grand Jury report.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This action addresses and contributes to Council’s Strategic Priority of Governance, Goal No. 1 “M
odel Good Governess, Teamwork, and Transparency”.

ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Staff recommends that City Council 1) adopt a resolution approving the City’s response to the 2021/2022 San Joaquin County Grand Jury Report on Cybersecurity, Case No. 0321 (
2021/2022), and 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the Response Letter.

Prepared
by: Karin Schnaider, Assistant City Manager
Reviewed by: Sara Cowell, Director of Finance
Approved by: Michael Rogers, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: 2021/2022 San Joaquin County Grand Jury Report Attachment B: City of Tracy’s Response to 2021/2022 San Joaquin County Grand Jury Report on Cybersecurity, Case No, 0321
2021−2022 San Joaquin County Grand Jury
Working Title 1: Working Title 2 (Case No. xx20)
San Joaquin County and Its Seven Cities:

Cybersecurity: Local Defense Against a Global Threat
Case #0321
Summary
We hear reports on a daily basis of cyberattacks occurring around the world. These attacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated, disruptive and expensive. Attacks on government agencies can disrupt essential services, crippling communities. Agencies small and large are equally vulnerable. There is an ever-growing demand for stolen data in an underground market.

Compromise of information has proven to be a serious threat on the cyber battleground, both domestically and internationally. Bad actors hack intelligence, media and essential service systems.

Other disasters such as floods, fires, storms or prolonged power outages can interrupt essential services if providers’ information systems are not adequately secure. According to one expert witness interviewed by the 2021-2022 Grand Jury, “World War III will be fought in cyberspace, not on the battlefield.”
Grand Jury members are not technical experts but sought to understand the cybersecurity landscape and local governments’ management of their cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities. In this investigation of information security of San Joaquin County and its seven cities, the 2021-2022 Grand Jury made a “point in time” assessment of each entity’s Information Systems Department (ISD), focusing primarily on cybersecurity. The Grand Jury considered nine elements of any ISD and, through research of relevant literature and input from industry experts, established an expected standard for each of those elements. The Grand Jury then evaluated each of the agencies with respect to those expectations.

The Grand Jury concluded that San Joaquin County (SJC) has mature and robust security policies and systems. The County’s security architecture provided a model in evaluating each city’s systems.

The Grand Jury determined that Escalon, Lodi and Stockton met a lay person’s expectations for cybersecurity but were lacking either a formal Business Continuity Plan (BCP) or Disaster Attachment A
2 Preparedness Plan (DPP). Lathrop, Manteca and Tracy were found to have adequate security systems in place but lack documented plans for both Business Continuity and Disaster Preparedness. Ripon was found to need improvement in meeting several of the Grand Jury’s expectations, with lack of personnel being their greatest challenge.

The Grand Jury recommends that the County and affected cities:
• develop, adopt and implement a Business Continuity Plan; • develop, adopt and implement an IT Disaster Preparedness Plan; • remedy specific cybersecurity risks found in this investigation; and • the City of Ripon undergo a data system security review by an expert third party to assess the City’s IT systems and protocols.

The Grand Jury recognizes that cybersecurity is a dynamic process, a continually moving target which needs constant monitoring and updating.

Glossary
• Access: The ability and means to communicate with or otherwise interact with a system ; to use system resources to manage information ; to gain knowledge of the information the system contains; to control system components and functions.
• Actor, bad actor, threat actor or attacker: An individual, group, organization or government that attempts or executes an attack.
• Attack: An intentional attempt to gain unauthorized access to system services, resources or information; an attempt to compromise system integrity. • Authentication: The process of verifying the identity or other attributes of an entity (user, process or device).
• Authorization: A process of determining, by evaluating applicable access control information, whether a subject is allowed to have the specified types of access to a particular resource. • BCP: Business Continuity Plan . A document that sets forth procedures for the continued performance of core capabilities, critical operations and user services dur ing any disruption or potential disruption.
• CCISDA: California County Information Services Directors Association. This is the official organization of the county IT directors and chief information officers throughout the state of California. CCISDA represents all 58 California counties in the area of information technology in county government.
• CIO: Chief Information Officer.
• Computer Aided Dispatch Systems: Used by dispatchers, call-takers, and 911 operators to prioritize and record incident calls, identify the status and locations of responders in the field and effectively dispatch responders.
• Confidentiality: A property of information that is not disclosed to users, processes or devices unless they have been authorized to access the information. • Cyber event or incident: An occurrence that actually or potentially results in adverse consequences to an information system or the information that the system processes, stores or transmits and that may require a response action to mitigate the consequences. An occurrence that constitutes a violation or imminent threat of violation of security policies, security procedures or acceptable use policies.
3 • Cybersecurity: The activity, process, ability, capability or state whereby information and communications systems and the information contained therein are protected from and/or defended against damage, unauthorized use, modification or exploitation. • DPP: Disaster Preparedness Plan. A document that sets forth policies and procedures for restoration of information systems after a critical incident or event from any source. The plan addresses interim restoration of information operations in the short and medium term and full restoration of all capabilities in the longer term.
• Data integrity: The property that data is complete, intact and trusted and has not been modified or destroyed in an unauthorized or accidental manner.
• Data security policy: A rule or set of rules that governs the acceptable use of an organization's information and services to a level of acceptable risk and the means for protecting the organization's information assets.
• Encryption: The process of converting data into a form that cannot be easily understood by unauthorized people or agents.
• Firewall: A capability to limit network traffic between networks and/or information systems. A hardware/software device, or a software program, that limits network traffic according to a set of rules of what access is and is not allowed or authorized. • Hacker: An unauthorized user who attempts to or gains access to an information system. • ISD: Information Systems Department.
• IT: Information Technology.
• KnowB4: A proprietary security awareness training platform. KnowB4 is used by agencies for simulated phishing activities and other email compromise tests, as well as for other IT security training needs.
• Malware: Software that compromises the operation of a system by performing an unauthorized function or process.
• Mobile device management tool: A security software tool designed to help organizations secure, manage and monitor mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. • Multi-factor authentication: An electronic authentication mechanism in which a user is granted access to an application only after presenting two or more pieces of evidence (factors or keys only the authentic user knows or possesses).
• Multi-layer security access: Multi-layer security refers to a system that uses numerous components to shield the IT infrastructure. It is a defense mechanism that mitigates, delays or prevents threats.
• Network or cyber infrastructure: The information and communication systems and services composed of all hardware and software that process, store and communicate information; any combination of all these elements.
• Next-generation systems: Security systems consisting of both firewall and intrusion prevention systems built in, rather than as add-ons, along with the features of basic firewalls. • Phishing: A digital form of social engineering to deceive individuals into providing sensitive information.
• Phishing test: A security training exercise designed to test users’ vulnerability and reinforce vigilance.
• Presidential Executive Order 14028: “Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity” (issued May 12, 2021) requires agencies to enhance their cybersecurity system integrity. 4 • Ransomware: A type of malicious software designed to block access to a computer system until a sum of money is paid.
• Ransomware attack response plan: A set of predetermined and documented procedures to detect and respond to a cyber incident involving demand for ransom for recovery and restoration of data or systems.
• Records Management System: The management of records for an organization throughout the records’ life cycle.
• Redundancy: Additional or alternative systems, sub-systems, assets or processes that maintain a degree of overall functionality in case of loss or failure of another system, sub-system, asset or process. Typically applied to power supplies and data backup systems. • Vulnerability: A characteristic or specific weakness that renders an organization or asset (such as information or an information system) open to exploitation by a given threat or susceptible to a given hazard.

Wi-Fi network: A family of wireless network protocols used for local area networking of devices and internet access, allowing nearby digital devices to exchange data by radio waves.

Background
The 2008-2009 San Joaquin County Grand Jury reported on information technology security, finding that several County departments and two of the seven cities in the county met expectations for Information Technology (IT) security, while some County departments and five cities did not.

Recommendations were made and generally accepted in agency responses. In terms of technology, 2008-2009 was at least a generation ago. Government agencies use and store vast amounts of sensitive data on their residents and their employees, including personal identification data, financial data, health data and legal data. Additionally, these agencies provide services essential to our day-to-day lives, including public safety (police and fire), public works, health services, water services and community development. The Grand Jury recognizes that we are lay people, hardly experts, in the field of IT. It was the intent of the 2021-2022 Grand Jury to examine how the county and city governments within San Joaquin County are exercising due diligence to protect information, defend against future cyberattacks, maintain current disaster plans and provide on- going training to employees in these matters.

Reason for Investigation
As stated in Presidential Executive Order 14028, “…the prevention, detection, assessment and remediation of cyber incidents is a top priority and essential to national economic security.” San Joaquin County has experienced ransomware and cybersecurity attacks firsthand. School districts, municipalities and county agencies have been victimized in recent years. Given the rise in complexity of IT, the current sophistication of cybercrime, and the essential nature of government services provided, the 2021-2022 Grand Jury undertook an investigation into the current state of security and disaster preparedness of the IT systems of San Joaquin County and the seven incorporated cities within the county.
5 Method of Investigation
The 2021-2022 Grand Jury surveyed six San Joaquin County IT department heads and the City Manager or City Administrator of each of the seven cities in the county; each responded to the survey. Subsequently, an agency IT department head or staff member, an IT consultant or a city administrator was interviewed to clarify responses and to provide additional material when applicable. The Grand Jury also interviewed independent cybersecurity experts. The expert witnesses have collectively more than 50 years’ experience at diverse levels of government ranging from county to state to national information systems and cybersecurity. IT executives from one school district were also interviewed. For this investigation, the Grand Jury interviewed 16 individuals and attended cybersecurity presentations.

The Grand Jury also reviewed numerous websites and newspaper and magazine articles relevant to this investigation. Additionally, the Grand Jury reviewed documents provided, including network diagrams, ransomware insurance policies and other items.

Materials Reviewed
• 2021-2022 San Joaquin County Grand Jury surveys
• Biden, Joseph. Executive Order on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity. 12 May 2021.

Executive Order#14028
• California Joint Cyber Incident Response Guide. California Office of Emergency Services Cyber Security Integration Center, 2 Aug. 2021
• Cyber Atack Preparedness in Contra Costa County. Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury, 2021. Report 2104
• Digital Services and Innovation Strategy. San Joaquin County, 19 Nov. 2020 • How to Develop a Ransomware Remediation Plan. Rubrik, 2021 • Information Technology Security. 2018-2019 Santa Barbara County Grand Jury, 2019 • Information Technology Security: Cities and San Joaquin County. 2008/2009 San Joaquin County Grand Jury, 2009. Report No.03-08
• Ransomware Defense for Dummies--2nd Edition. 2nd ed., Cisco Umbrella, 2021 Websites Visited
• Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency. “CYBERSECURITY | CISA.” Cisa.gov, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, 2019, www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity. Accessed 6 May 2022.
• Federal Trade Commission, and Alvaro Puig. “Cybersecurity Advice to Protect Your Connected Devices and Accounts.” Sjgov.org, 24 Mar. 2022, www.sjgov.org/department/da/consumer- alerts/consumer-alerts/2022/03/24/cybersecurity-advice-to-protect-your-connected-devices-and- accounts. Accessed 6 May 2022.
• Kuykendall, By Kristal. “Cybersecurity Experts Call for More Transparency and Immediate Resources for Schools -.” The Journal, 17 Mar. 2022,
thejournal.com/Articles/2022/03/17/Cybersecurity-Experts-Call-For-More-Transparency-and- Immediate-Resources-for-Schools.aspx?Page=1. Accessed 6 May 2022. 6 • Marcum Accounts Advisors. “What Is a SOC 2?” The SSAE 18 Reporting Standard - SOC 1 - SOC 2 - SOC 3 (Formerly SSAE 16), 8 Jan. 2022, www.ssae-16.com/faq/what-is-a-soc-2/.

Accessed 30 Apr. 2022.
• National Institute for Cybersecurity Careers and Studies. “Cybersecurity Glossary | National Initiative for Cybersecurity Careers and Studies.” Niccs.cisa.gov, niccs.cisa.gov/about- niccs/cybersecurity-glossary. Accessed 6 May 2022.
• Unisys. “Cyber Attacks--What You Need to Know.” Unisys, 2022, www.unisys.com. Accessed 6 May 2022.

Discussions, Findings and Recommendations
General Discussion
The Grand Jury recognizes cybersecurity is an extremely complicated topic. Specialized knowledge, experience and expertise are required for a deep understanding of what is necessary for adequate policies, systems and architecture. Lacking such specialized knowledge, the Grand Jury researched numerous sources, including recognized experts in this field to determine the following elements of any ISD and to define the following expectations for adequate cybersecurity in today’s environment.

Expectations
• Organization: Each organization should have a detailed Organization Chart demonstrating the structure of its independent IT department. Cities lacking an independent IT department should have a chart showing where IT resides in their overall structure. • Network Diagram: Each organization should have a detailed network diagram indicating the relationships between all IT architectural elements. Best-practice guidelines suggest that this diagram be confidential.
• Data Confidentiality: Each organization should have an organization-wide policy determining data confidentiality and access control. Policy for data access should be clearly defined and desk- specific or station-specific.
• Data Security: Each organization should have next-generation systems and controls to ensure both physical and cyber security for all IT assets. Next-generation firewalls and endpoint management systems provide protection against ever-evolving means of cyberattack. Data should be protected with daily or continuous backup and archival systems. Backups should be protected against corruption, external encryption and/or destruction. Agencies should require multi-factor authentication for access to network systems. • Business Continuity Plan (BCP): Each organization should have a detailed, current, comprehensive plan for restoring services in the event of disruption from any source. • Disaster Preparedness Plan (DPP): Each organization should have a formal, detailed plan to prepare for various possible IT disruptions. This plan should be tested frequently and updated regularly.
• Ransomware Policy: Each organization should have an internal (confidential) documented policy for agency response to a ransomware attack.
7 • Cyber Event Insurance: Each organization should have insurance coverage to help offset economic losses from cyber events.
• Ongoing Employee Training: Each organization should provide rigorous, frequent training and ongoing testing of all employees as an integral part of its cybersecurity profile.

Survey Results:

The table below indicates whether an agency met (M), did not meet (NM) or was in the process of meeting (IP) the nine defined expectations.

Org
Chart
Network
Diagram
Data
Confidentiality
Data
Security
BCP DPP Ransomware
Policy
Cyber
Insurance
Training

SJC M M M M M M NM M M
Escalon M M M M NM M M M M
Lathrop M M M M NM M NM NM M
Lodi M M M M IP M M M M
Manteca M M M M M M IP IP M
Ripon M M M M NM NM NM M M
Stockton M M M M M M NM M M
Tracy M M M M IP IP NM M M

1.0 San Joaquin County−Discussion
In November 2020, San Joaquin County released a three-year (2020-2023) strategic plan for ensuring continuing security, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and best-service outcomes to all end-users of County services and systems. The plan document “San Joaquin County Digital Services and Innovation Strategy” established goals for County digital service systems. These goals— Modernizing and Leveraging Our Technology Environment—address objectives for a security posture:

1. Acquire and implement cybersecurity technology to enable SJC to develop industry-leading capabilities to help mitigate and address cybersecurity risk.

2. Develop and mature security governance and processes to meet or exceed industry standards, enhance security enforcement partnerships, and strengthen County practices.

3. Develop a robust security training program for the County workforce, including enhanced training and development for the security workforce.

Excerpt from “San Joaquin County Digital Services and Innovation Strategy,” November 19, 2020 (page 6) San Joaquin County has met these objectives and continues to update and enhance these processes as the cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve.
8 San Joaquin County ISD oversees all County departments, making it one of the largest county ISDs in California. San Joaquin County ISD is an active participant in the California County Information Systems Department Association (CCISDA). This association provides opportunities for counties to share information and experiences and offers guidance, such as standards for best-practice policies.

Several large and specialized departments within the County have their own IT departments and department chiefs who report to the County’s Chief Information Officer. Additionally, SJC has a dedicated Information Security Officer. All these IT executives form a cybersecurity governance committee which meets monthly, with subgroups meeting more frequently as needed.

County ISD and Human Resource Departments conduct frequent and on-going employee training and testing using proprietary software. In addition to these County departments, several Independent Special Districts in SJC use County IT services through various memoranda of understanding.

The only element of the defined expectations not met by SJC is having an internal documented policy for response to a ransomware attack.

San Joaquin County is a model agency in the realm of information technology and maintenance of cybersecurity.

Findings
F1.1 San Joaquin County does not have a formal internal policy concerning payments or procedures in ransomware attacks. This absence of policy could cause confusion, delay and greater loss of security in the event of such an attack.

F1.2 San Joaquin County has an exemplary profile regarding cybersecurity and should serve as a model for other government agencies within San Joaquin County.

Recommendations
R1.1 By November 1, 2022, the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors, in conjunction with San Joaquin County ISD, develop, adopt and implement a formal internal policy and procedure for response to a ransomware attack.

2.0 City of Escalon−Discussion
The City of Escalon does not have an independent IT department but has a contract agreement with Mid Valley IT to provide all IT services. In the City organization, IT functions report to the Finance and HR Directors. Each employee is given a level of access according to assigned responsibilities within their department. All employees receive information security training specific to their responsibilities as well as general security awareness training. The IT consultant employs an aggressive multi-layered approach to mitigate security threats through software and hardware protection measures. Critical or confidential data is stored in multiple cloud-based locations and systems employing numerous safeguards, including use of multi-factor authentication for access.

IT functions are protected with a standby generator and redundant backups in case of a system failure. The generator is tested periodically for functionality. 9 The City of Escalon met all but one of the expectations for adequate cybersecurity. Escalon is by far the smallest city in San Joaquin County, but by using a contracted IT service provider, Escalon is meeting its cybersecurity needs. The City of Escalon does not have a documented Business Continuity Plan.

Findings
F2.1 The City of Escalon does not have a documented Business Continuity Plan, leaving the City relatively unprepared to restore essential services in a disruptive event.

Recommendations
R2.1 By January 1, 2023, the Escalon City Council, in conjunction with Mid Valley IT, develop, adopt and implement a Business Continuity Plan.

3.0 City of Lathrop−Discussion
The City of Lathrop met six of the expectations for the nine elements considered in this investigation. Lathrop’s IT organization includes a Director of Information Technology at the cabinet leadership level, a policy strongly recommended by an IT expert for maximum IT security. Including the Director of IT in frequent, regular meetings with other department heads allows effective communication of IT security needs to all City departments.

Expectations for data confidentiality and data security were met. However, use of multi-factor authentication for system access was not universal at the time of this investigation, leaving Lathrop at higher risk of attack. Lathrop provides an unsecured public Wi-Fi network, separate from the City’s secure business network and accessible to any user. Hackers or other bad actors could take advantage of the unsecured network, possibly resulting in compromise of log-in credentials from that network and possibly exposing the City to costly liability suits. Lathrop was in the process of developing and approving a BCP and DPP plan at the time of this investigation. Similarly, the City was updating an internal policy for response to a ransomware attack. At the time of this investigation, Lathrop lacked insurance against losses incurred in a cybersecurity incident.

Findings
F3.1 The City of Lathrop does not employ multi-factor authentication universally, leaving City systems more vulnerable to the activities of bad actors.

F3.2 The City of Lathrop provides an unsecured public Wi-Fi network. Misuse of this unsecured network could expose the City to liability risks.

F3.3 The City of Lathrop does not have an approved Business Continuity Plan, rendering the City relatively unprepared to restore essential services in a disruptive event. 10 F3.4 The City of Lathrop does not have a formal internal policy or procedure to address ransomware attacks. This absence of policy could cause confusion, delay and greater loss of security in the event of such an attack.

F3.5 The City of Lathrop does not have an insurance policy covering financial losses from a cyberattack, possibly exposing City financial resources.

Recommendations
R3.1 By November 1, 2022, the Lathrop City Council, in conjunction with the City’s IT department, develop, adopt and implement a procedure for universal multi-factor authentication for access to City data.

R3.2 By November 1, 2022, the Lathrop City Council, in conjunction with the City’s IT department, provide a secure public Wi-Fi network.

R3.3 By January 1, 2023, the Lathrop City Council, in conjunction with the City’s IT department, develop, adopt and implement a Business Continuity Plan.

R3.4 By November 1, 2022, the Lathrop City Council, in conjunction with the City’s IT department, develop, adopt and implement a formal internal policy and procedure for a ransomware attack.

R3.5 By January 1, 2023, the Lathrop City Council, in conjunction with the City’s IT department, obtain an insurance policy to mitigate fiscal impact resulting from cyberattack or other critical information system loss.

4.0 City of Lodi−Discussion
The City of Lodi has a large IT division, responsible for all IT functions of the City. The division is responsible for the integrity of the City’s cyber infrastructure, maintenance and support of all hardware and software, and assuring secure access to all network resources. Lodi fell victim to a ransom attack in April 2019. That unfortunate event caused the City to change its management of cybersecurity, significantly elevating the importance of vigilance by all City staff. Lodi has implemented a robust cyber awareness training program for all City employees, incorporating education in tactics used by bad actors both inside and outside the City’s network. Monthly training is followed by testing in topics covered. Citywide campaigns occur quarterly to test employee response to phishing and other email-based attacks. The IT division head reports directly to the Deputy City Manager and meets regularly with all City department heads. The City of Lodi met all expectations for cybersecurity except for having a completed, up-to-date Business Continuity Plan.

The City has contracted a business consulting firm to create a BCP, projected to be completed and implemented by the end of June 2022.
11 Findings
F4.1 The City of Lodi does not have an approved Business Continuity Plan, rendering the City relatively unprepared to restore essential services in a disruptive event.

F4.2 The City of Lodi has implemented an excellent cyber awareness training program for all employees minimizing risk to damage from cyberattack.

Recommendations
R4.1 By January 1, 2023, the Lodi City Council, in conjunction with the City’s IT division, develop, adopt and implement a Business Continuity Plan.

5.0 City of Manteca−Discussion
The City of Manteca met seven of the nine expectations considered in this investigation. Manteca’s Information Technology department is independent in the City’s organization. The department director reports directly to the City Manager and meets weekly with other City department heads.

User level of access is determined by position, background and other departmental factors.

Employees are trained on a regular basis. The training is mandatory for all employees. Hard drives are encrypted, and a Mobile Device Management tool is used for tablets, laptops and phones.

Manteca’s ISD is currently updating its Information Technology Security Policy. This comprehensive policy has not been updated since 2010. Manteca’s Department of Information Technology and Innovation is collaborating with City administration and the City Attorney to update all policies relating to information technology security. Similarly, the City is in the process of bringing both hardware and software systems up to next-generation standards with new firewall, malware, user access, backup systems and applications in place. Employee training is executed through KnowB4, an industry-standard cybersecurity training program which includes phishing and other email compromise testing.

Regarding firewalls and switches, roughly 60% still operate off single rather than dual or redundant power supplies. Over the next five years, the City is phasing out older devices as they reach end-of- life.

Findings
F5.1 The City of Manteca has an Information Technology Security Policy which has not been updated since 2010, leaving the City relatively unprepared for a cyber event.

F5.2 The City of Manteca lacks a policy and procedure for ransomware attacks. This absence of policy could cause confusion, delay, and greater loss of security in the event of such an attack.

F5.3 The City of Manteca has a significant number of security devices with single power supplies.

This lack of redundant power presents vulnerability in major or prolonged power outages. 12 Recommendations
R5.1 By January 1, 2023, the Manteca City Council, in conjunction with the City’s ISD, develop, approve and implement an updated Information Technology Security Policy.

R5.2 By January 1, 2023, the Manteca City Council, in conjunction with the City’s ISD, develop, approve and implement a confidential policy and procedure for response to a ransomware attack.

R5.3 By March 1, 2023, the Manteca City Council, in conjunction with the City’s ISD, develop, approve and adopt an updated timeline to replace single-powered units with dual-powered or redundant-powered units in their network architecture.

6.0 City of Ripon−Discussion
The City of Ripon has experienced turnover and vacancies in the IT Department in the past year.

The Director of IT resigned in early 2021. Subsequently, another IT Director was hired but resigned within three months. The City has contracted with a former IT employee as a temporary IT Director and is currently updating the job description for a permanent director of the IT functions.

The City’s organization chart does not include an IT department or department head. The only IT position shown is within the Police Department.

Data confidentiality is maintained through a three-tiered access structure. Management supervisors for each City department determine who has access to appropriate information.

Sensitive data is held within a Computer Aided Dispatch Program or a Records Management System within the IT division of the Ripon Police Department. The sensitivity of data with all other City departments is determined by supervisors.

Findings
F6.1 It is unclear in the City of Ripon’s Organization Chart where responsibilities for IT and IT security lie, creating confusion over who is responsible to act in a disruptive event.

F6.2 The City of Ripon has a rudimentary network diagram outlining the City’s router and firewall relationship with networks used, but the diagram lacks detail, leaving uncertainty about data security.

F6.3 Although the City of Ripon met expectations in the areas of data confidentiality and security, lack of IT staff and leadership leaves these areas vulnerable to cyberattack.

F6.4 The City of Ripon lacks a Business Continuity Plan, rendering the City relatively unprepared to restore essential services in a disruptive event.

F6.5 The City of Ripon does not have a Disaster Preparedness Plan, leaving the City at risk for significant delay and cost to restore IT systems in the event of a disaster.

F6.6 The City of Ripon does not have a formal policy or procedure to address ransomware attacks. This absence of policy could cause confusion, delay and greater loss of security in the event of an attack.
13 Recommendations
R6.1 By January 1, 2023, the Ripon City Council develop and make public an updated City Organization chart showing details of the City’s IT functions, including all IT positions.

R6.2 By January 1, 2023, the Ripon City Council develop and adopt a detailed Network Diagram to decrease security vulnerabilities.

R6.3 By January 1, 2023, the Ripon City Council obtain a third-party security review of the City’s IT department assets, positions, and policies and an evaluation of data confidentiality, security systems and protocols.

R6.4 By January 1, 2023, the Ripon City Council develop, adopt and implement a formal Business Continuity Plan.

R6.5 By January 1, 2023, the Ripon City Council develop, adopt and implement a formal Disaster Preparedness Plan for IT functions.

R6.6 By January 1, 2023, the Ripon City Council develop, adopt and implement a formal internal policy and procedure for response to a ransomware attack.

7.0 City of Stockton−Discussion
The City of Stockton has a large IT department that oversees IT functions for all the City’s other departments. Data confidentiality and user access are determined departmentally, following uniform standards. Information is protected by many safeguards aiming not only to minimize risk of penetration but also to detect any breach that might occur. Stockton has both a BCP and a DPP.

Stockton is one of very few cities having license to use a cybersecurity tool integrating the City with the State of California’s Office of Emergency Services. Stockton’s IT Director meets weekly with other department heads, updating them on all matters related to cybersecurity.

Stockton met each of the cybersecurity expectations except for the presence of a documented internal policy and procedure for response to a ransomware attack. However, the City does have a Cybersecurity Response Book detailing response procedures for other cyber events. Employee security awareness training is required every six months.

Findings
F7.1 The City of Stockton does not have a formal internal policy concerning payments or procedures in ransomware attacks. This absence of policy could cause confusion, delay and greater loss of security in the event of an attack.

F7.2 The City of Stockton has a large IT Department which places cybersecurity and disaster preparedness at a high priority, minimizing risk to the City’s information and service systems. 14 Recommendations
R7.1 By November 1, 2022, the Stockton City Council, in conjunction with the City’s IT department, develop, adopt and implement a formal internal policy and procedure for response to a ransomware attack.

8.0 City of Tracy−Discussion
The City of Tracy met all expectations for cybersecurity or was in the process of meeting them when surveyed. The City has an Information Technology Division, which is part of the Finance Department. This division supports all departments and functions of the City except water treatment. Data confidentiality and security are guaranteed with industry-leading, next-generation firewalls and network access controls. Data storage, backup and cybersecurity are monitored continually. The IT Manager meets every two weeks with all other City department heads to address IT issues, including cybersecurity.

Tracy does not require encryption of thumb drives used on City devices, a requirement that is considered a “best practice” by an expert witness.

Tracy does not have either a formal Business Continuity Plan or Disaster Preparedness Plan in place but is in the process of developing both. The BCP was scheduled to be complete in April 2022.

Completion date for the DPP was not specified by the City.

Findings
F8.1 Lacking a requirement for encryption of thumb drives used on City devices exposes the City of Tracy to potential data theft and contamination.

F8.2 The City of Tracy lacks a completed Business Continuity Plan, rendering Tracy relatively unprepared to restore essential services in a disruptive event.

F8.3 The City of Tracy lacks a completed Disaster Preparedness Plan, leaving Tracy at risk for delay and cost to restore IT systems in the event of a disaster.

Recommendations
R8.1 By November 1, 2022, the Tracy City Council, in conjunction with the IT division, develop, adopt and implement a policy requiring encryption of thumb drives used on City devices.

R8.2 By January 1, 2023, the Tracy City Council, in conjunction with the IT division, develop, adopt and implement a formal Business Continuity Plan.

R8.3 By January 1, 2023, the Tracy City Council provide the Grand Jury with an updated formal Disaster Preparedness Plan.
15 Conclusion
San Joaquin County is well protected regarding cybersecurity. The seven cities in the county vary with respect to Grand Jury expectations, most being well secured but lacking defined plans for Business Continuity and IT Disaster Preparedness. Cybersecurity is an evolving concern and requires ongoing efforts by government entities to remain current and vigilant against risks to their Information Systems.

In this investigation the Grand Jury learned from cybersecurity experts that three key elements lead to maximum agency cybersecurity:
• a dedicated information security position within each organization, • a “seat at the table” with other agency department heads in regular meetings, and • a rigorous employee education and training program in cybersecurity matters.

Disclaimers
Grand Jury reports are based on documentary evidence and the testimony of sworn or admonished witnesses, not on conjecture or opinion. However, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing such evidence except upon the specific approval of the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, or another judge appointed by the Presiding Judge (Penal Code Section 911. 924.1 (a) and 929). Similarly, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing the identity of witnesses except upon an order of the court for narrowly defined purposes (Penal Code Sections 924.2 and 929).

Response Requirements
California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05 require that specific responses to all findings and recommendations contained in this report be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the San Joaquin County Superior Court within 90 days of receipt of the report.

The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors and the City Councils of each city addressed shall respond to all findings and recommendations specific to their city.

Mail or hand deliver a hard copy of the response to:

Honorable Michael D. Coughlan, Presiding Judge
San Joaquin County Superior Court
180 E Weber Ave, Suite 1306J
Stockton, California 95202
Also, please email a copy of the response to Ms. Trisa Martinez, Staff Secretary to the Grand Jury, at [email protected]
City of Tracy
333 Civic Center Plaza
Tracy, CA 95376
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
MAIN 209.831.6130
FAX 209.831.6137
www.cityoftracy.org
Decem
ber 6, 2022
Honorabl
e Michael D. Coughlan, Presiding Judge
San Joaquin County Superior Court
180 East Weber Avenue, Suite 1306J
Stockton, CA 95202
Re: R
esponse to Grand Jury Final Report Case No. 0321 (2021/2022) Report received by the City of Tracy on June 15, 2022
Honorabl
e Michael D. Coughlan,
The Cit
y of Tracy has reviewed the follow-up report to the 2021-2022 San Joaquin County Grand Jury Case No. 0321, regarding Cybersecurity. Pursuant to Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, this letter is to inform you that the City of Tracy’s responses to the Cybersecurity findings are below.

Finding
F8.1: Lacking a requirement for encryption of thumb drives used on City devices exposes the City of Tracy to potential data theft and contamination.

Recomm
endations R8.1: By November 1, 2022, the Tracy City Council, in conjunction with the IT division, develop, adopt and implement a policy requiring encryption of thumb drives used on City devices.

Cit
y’s Response: IT has developed a draft policy to require encrypted thumb drives which will be routed through HR for official adoption. For the implementation of administrative policies such as the one for the encryption of thumb drives, the City of Tracy’s procedures require that these draft policies be routed to the various bargaining units for approval. The draft IT policy is currently being circulated to these units and should be ready for adoption shortly. While we strive to remove technological barriers that encourage removable storage use, we recognize special situations exist that require it. Once the new policy is rolled out all thumb drives used for City data or on City-owned devices will be required by the policy to be encrypted.

Finding
F8.2: The City of Tracy lacks a completed Business Continuity Plan, rendering Tracy relatively unprepared to restore essential services in a disruptive event.

Recomm
endations R8.2: By January 1, 2023, the Tracy City Council, in conjunction with the IT division, develop, adopt and implement a formal Business Continuity Plan.

Attachment B
November 29, 2022

City’s Response: Human Resources coordinated with a consultant and management from each department to draft a Business Continuity Plan to be finalized as an Annex to the City of Tracy Emergency Management Plan. The South San Joaquin County Fire Authority has contracted services to prepare the draft Emergency Management Plan which is anticipated to be finalized in the fall of 2022. The IT Manager had several meetings with the consultant to summarize the business continuity plan for the information technology needs of the organization. The IT department is aware of the lack of an IT-specific Disaster Recovery / Business continuity plan as it relates to a Cyber incident. The IT department will be crafting an RFP to include a disaster preparedness plan and necessary infrastructure additions as well as IT-specific Business Continuity. In addition, we plan to add a dedicated information security position this fiscal year in line with the Grand Jury recommendation. It is generally recognized practice for the Security Officer in an organization to maintain a Disaster Preparedness and Business Continuity Plan. Due to the nature of this policy adoption, as part of the Tracy Emergency Management Plan, City Council approval is required. The City is striving to adopt this Business Continuity Plan by the first quarter of 2023.

Findings
F8.3: The City of Tracy lacks a completed Disaster Preparedness Plan, leaving Tracy at risk for delay and cost to restore IT systems in the event of a disaster.

Recomm
endations R8.3: By January 1, 2023, the Tracy City Council provide the Grand Jury with an updated formal Disaster Preparedness Plan.

Cit
y’s Response: We view the business continuity, and the disaster preparedness plans as two sides of the same coin that work hand in hand and should be addressed holistically. Any large- scale Cyber business continuity event should be treated in a similar way as a disaster. Most equipment will be unavailable for extended periods of time due to the necessary forensics. We plan on addressing this in conjunction with the IT-specific business continuity plan as outlined in the response to Finding 8.2. Due to the nature of this policy, as an annexation to the City of Tracy Emergency Management Plan, City Council approval is required. The City is striving to adopt the Disaster Preparedness Plan by the first quarter of 2023.

The Cit
y of Tracy thanks the Grand Jury for its engagement and review of the Cyber Security in San Joaquin County and appreciates the opportunity to respond to this report. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.

Respectfu
lly Submitted,
Nancy
Young
Mayor, City of Tracy
Cc:

Trisa Martinez at [email protected]

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
________________________

CITY AT
TORNEY’S OFFICE

TRACY CITY

COUNCIL

RESOLUT
ION NO. _______________
1) A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY’S RESPONSE TO THE 2021/2022

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT ON CYBERSECURITY,
CASE NO. 0321 (2021/2022), AND
2) AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE RESPONSE LETTER
WHEREAS, On June 15, 2022, The San Joaquin County Civil Grand Jury released its final consolidated yearly report, addressing cybersecurity (Case No. 0321); and WHEREAS, The
Grand Jury reviewed cybersecurity practices of the City of Tracy along with the
other six incorporated cities in San Joaquin County to see if they were exercising due diligence
in protecting information resources; and
WHEREAS, The Grand Jury concluded that San Joaquin County (SJC) has mature and robust
security policies and systems; and
WHEREAS, The Grand Jury report contained three findings and three recommendations for the City of Tracy; and
WHEREAS, The first finding noted that the City did not have a policy requiring the use of encrypted thumb drives use on City devices; and
WHEREAS, The second finding noted that City needed to develop, adopt, and implement a formal Business Continuity Plan; and
W
HEREAS, The third recommendation noted t hat City needed t o develop, adopt, and implement a formal Disaster Preparation Plan; and
WHEREAS, S tate law r equires t hat t he City r espond to the G rand Jury’s f inding and recommendations with a response on how to address these issues.

WHEREAS, The City has drafted a response stating that the City has either complied with the recommendation or is currently in the process of complying by completing the recommended disaster preparedness plans; now, therefore, be it
Resolution 2022-____

RESOLVED: That the City Council of the City of Tracy hereby 1) adopts the City’s response to the 2021/2022 San Joaquin County Grand Jury Report on Cybersecurity, Case No. 0321
(2021/2022), and 2) authorizes the Mayor to sign the response letter. * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The foregoing Resolution 2022-_____ was adopted by the Tracy City Council on the 6th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTENTION: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________________
NANCY D. YOUNG
Mayor of the City of Tracy, California
ATTEST:

ADRIANNE RICHARDSON
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Tracy, California