Tracy City Council
February 21, 2023

Date Posted: February 16, 2023

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR IN-PERSON AND REMOTE PARTICIPATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e).

THE CITY OF TRACY REMAINS UNDER A LOCAL EMERGENCY FOR COVID-19 AND IS NOW CONDUCTING TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS PURSUANT TO STATE LAW.

TELECONFERENCED LOCATIONS MAY INCLUDE VARIOUS LOCATIONS INCLUDING TRACY CITY HALL. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

HEALTH GUIDELINES, UNIVERSAL MASKING IS RECOMMENDED FOR ALL PERSONS

REGARDLESS OF VACCINATION STATUS AND SOCIAL DISTANCING PROTOCOLS WILL BE IN PLACE FOR TRACY CITY HALL.

MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THE MEETING VIA THE FOLLOWING METHOD:

As always, the public may view the City Council meetings live on the City of Tracy’s website at CityofTracy.org or on Comcast Channel 26/AT&T U-v
erse Channel 99. To view from the City’s website,
open the “Government” menu at the top of the City’s homepage and select “City Council Meeting Videos” under the “City Council” section.

If
you only wish to watch the meeting and do not wish to address the Council, the City requests that you stream the meeting through the City’s website or watch on Channel 26.

Remote Public Comment:

During the upcoming City Council meeting public comment will be accepted via the options listed below. If you would like to comment remotely, please follow the protocols below:
• Comments via:
o Online by visiting https://cityoftracyevents.webex.com and using the following Event Number: 2555 933 3346 and Event Password: TracyCC o If you would like to participate in the public comment anonymously, you may submit your comment in WebEx by typing “Anonymous” when prompted to provide a First and Last Name and inserting [email protected] when prompted to provide an email address.
o Join by phone by dialing +1-408 -418-9388, enter 25559333346#8722922# Press *3 to raise the hand icon to speak on an item.

• Protocols for commenting via WebEx:
o If you wish to comment on the “Consent Calendar”, “Items from the Audience/Public Comment” or “Regular Agenda” portions of the agenda:
 Listen for the Mayor to open that portion of the agenda for discussion, then raise your hand to speak by clicking on the Hand icon on the Participants panel to the right of your screen.
 If you no longer wish to comment, you may lower your hand by clicking on the Hand icon again.

TRACY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

Tuesday, February 21, 2023, 7:00 P.M.

Tracy City Hall Chambers, 333 Civic Center Plaza, Tracy Web Site: www.cityoftracy.org

TRACY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 February 21, 2023

o Comments for the “Consent Calendar” “Items from the Agenda/Public Comment” or “Regular Agenda” portions of the agenda will be accepted until the public comment for that item is closed.

Comments received on Webex outside of the comment periods outlined above will not be included in the record.

Americans With Disabilities Act - The City of Tracy complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act and makes all reasonable accommodations for the disabled to participate in Council meetings. Persons requiring assistance or auxiliary aids should call City Hall (209/831-6105) 24 hours prior to the meeting.

Addressing the Council on Items on the Agenda - The Brown Act provides that every regular Council meeting shall provide an opportunity for the public to address the Council on any item within its jurisdiction before or during the Council's consideration of the item, provided no action shall be taken on any item not on the agenda. To facilitate the orderly process of public comment and to assist the Council to conduct its business as efficiently as possible, members of the public wishing to address the Council are requested to, but not required to, hand a speaker card, which includes the speaker’s name or other identifying designation and address to the City Clerk prior to the agenda item being called. Generally, once the City Council begins its consideration of an item, no more speaker cards will be accepted. An individual’s failure to present a speaker card or state their name shall not preclude the individual from addressing the Council. Each citizen will be allowed a maximum of five minutes for input or testimony. In the event there are 15 or more individuals wishing to speak regarding any agenda item including the “Items from the Audience/Public Comment” portion of the agenda and regular items, the maximum amount of time allowed per speaker will be three minutes. When speaking under a specific agenda item, each speaker should avoid repetition of the remarks of the prior speakers. To promote time efficiency and an orderly meeting, the Presiding Officer may request that a spokesperson be designated to represent similar views. A designated spokesperson shall have 10 minutes to speak. At the Presiding Officer’s discretion, additional time may be granted. The City Clerk shall be the timekeeper.

Consent Calendar - All items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and/or consistent wit h previous City Council direction. One motion, a second, and a roll call vote may enact the items listed on the Consent Calendar. No separate discussion of Consent Calendar items shall take place unless a member of the City Council, City staff or the public request discussion on a specific item.

Addressing the Council on Items not on the Agenda – The Brown Act prohibits discussion or action on items not on the posted agenda. The City Council’s Meeting Protocols and Rules of Procedure provide that in the interest of allowing Council to have adequate time to address the agendized items of business, “Items from the Audience/Public Comment” following the Consent Calendar will be limited to 15- minutes maximum period. “Items from the Audience/Public Comment” listed near the end of the agenda will not have a maximum time limit. A five- minute maximum time limit per speaker will apply to all individuals speaking during “Items from the Audience/Public Comment”. For non-agendized items, Council Members may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by individuals during public comment; ask questions for clarification; direct the individual to the appropriate staff member; or request that the matter be placed on a future agenda or that staff provide additional information to Council. When members of the public address the Council, they should be as specific as possible about their concerns. If several members of the public comment on the same issue an effort should be made to avoid repetition of views already expressed.

Notice - A 90 day limit is set by law for filing challenges in the Superior Court to certain City administrative decisions and orders when those decisions or orders require: (1) a hearing by law, (2) the receipt of evidence, and (3) the exercise of discretion. The 90 day limit begins on the date the decision is final (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6). Further, if you challenge a City Council action in court, you may be limited, by California law, including but not limited to Government Code Section 65009, to raising only those issues you or someone else raised during the public hearing, or raised in written correspondence delivered to the City Council prior to or at the public hearing.

Full copies of the agenda are available on the City’s website: www.cityoftracy.org

Date Posted: February 16, 2023
TRACY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3 February 21, 2023

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INVOCATION

ROLL CALL

PRESENTATIONS

1. Proclamation - March as Women’s History Month and International Women’s Day

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

1.A. Adoption of February 7, 2023, City Council Closed Session Minutes, Special Concurrent Meeting of the City Council and Transportation Advisory Commission Meeting minutes and City Council Regular Meeting Minutes.

1.B. Adopt a resolution: (1) Authorizing a Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC for diversity, equity, and inclusion consultant services for a total not-to- exceed amount of $166,500 for a one-year term; and (2) Appropriating funding in the amount of $116,500 from the General Fund reserves to the Human Resources operating budget and amend the FY 2022-23 Operating Budget to reflect such appropriation.

1.C. Adopt a resolution approving a Master Services Agreement with Crossroads, Inc. for the installation, implementation, training, and annual maintenance of automated traffic collision and citation technology for a term of five (5) years and a total not to exceed amount of $180,000, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any amendments.

1.D. City Council (1) accept the construction for the Pavement Rehabilitation Project , FY
2019-2020, CIP 73176, work completed by Tracy Grading and Paving, Inc., of Tracy, California, (2) authorize the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion, (3) authorize the City Engineer to release the bonds and retention payment, and (4) authorize the Finance Department to close the Project.

1.E. Adopt a resolution approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan and setting a Vision Zero goal for 2050.

1.F. Adopt a resolution: (1) Approving a General Services Agreement with Sweeping Corp of America, LLC to provide street, alley, and parking lot sweeping services for an initial term of two (2) years and a total not to exceed amount $859,100 annually; (2) Authorizing the City Manager to execute the General Services Agreement, extensions up to five (5) years, and amendments to the Agreement; and (3) Appropriating $46,000 from the Solid Waste Fund (F531) to fund the Agreement for fiscal year 2023.

1.G. Adopt a resolution declaring the intention to reimburse expenditures from proceeds of tax-exempt obligations to be issued by the City for and on behalf of City of Tracy Community Facilities District No. 2016-2 (ECFD).

1.H. Adopt a resolution declaring the intention to reimburse expenditures from proceeds of tax-exempt obligations to be issued by the City for and on behalf of City of Tracy Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Tracy Hills).

1.I. A dopt a resolution amending the City’s Operating and Capital Budget for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2023, and authorize the Budget Officer to amend the City’s position control roster for FY2022-23.

TRACY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 February 21, 2023

2. ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE

3. REGULAR AGENDA

3.A. Staff recommends that the City Council

1. Conduct a hearing on the Resolutions of Necessity (RON) to authorize the acquisition of fee simple interests, permanent easements and/or temporary construction easements for the I-580/Patterson Road Interchange Project (Project) and to make the required findings for f ive properties owned by and located at:

1. ARP Minimart Corporation – 25775 Patterson Pass Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number 209-100-040) (Minimart).

2. Debra Ann Leal & Janice Lynn Gee – 26116 Patterson Pass Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number 209-090-21) ( Leal/Gee) .

3. Harminder Kaur; Rajwinder Kaur; Gupreet Singh; Charnit Singh and Ramandeep Kaur, Trustees – 25883 S. Patterson Pass Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number 209-100-280) (Kaur et al).

4. Pankaj Kalra and Tanu Kalra, Trustees; Kanwar Raj Singh and Priya Aggarwal, Trustees; Smile Dhir and Antima Ghai, Trustees; Atul Arora and Shefali Arora, Trustees; Tabir Singh Dhillon- 26106 Patterson Pass Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number 209-100-300) (Kalra et al).

5. Jet Mulch, Inc. – V ia Nicolo Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number 209-100- 310) (Jet Mulch).

2. Adopt RONs for Minimart, Leal/Gee, Kaur et al, Kalra et al, and Jet Mulch, finding that the Public Interest, Convenience and Necessity require the Acquisition of Certain Property Interests for the Project, Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof, and directing the City Attorney to file Eminent Domain Proceedings.

3.B. Receive an informational report regarding the City of Tracy Police Department’s Annual Report for 2022.

3.C. Receive the annual informational report for the Parks and Community Services Commission for Fiscal Year 2021/2022.

3.D. Receive an informational report regarding the annual report of the Transportation Advisory Commission.

4. ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE

5. STAFF ITEMS

6. COUNCIL ITEMS

7. ADJOURNMENT

TRACY CITY COUNCIL - SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
February 7, 2023, 5:00 p.m.

Tracy City Hall, 333 Civic Center Plaza, Tracy, CA.

1. Mayor
Pro Tem Davis called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m.

2. Roll
call found Council Members Arriola, Evans, and Mayor Pro Tem Davis present.

Mayor Young participated remotely.

3. ITEM
S FROM THE AUDIENCE – None

4. Request
to Conduct Closed Session
Conference with Labor Negotiators (Gov. Code § 54957.6) o City
Negotiators:

Michael Rogers, City Manager
Kimberly Murdaugh, Human Resources Director
Midori Lichtwardt, Assistant City Manager
Karin Schnaider, Assistant City Manager
Sara Cowell, Finance Director
Bijal Patel, City Attorney
Che Johnson, Special Counsel
o Empl
oyee Organizations:

General Teamsters Local No. 439, IBT
Tracy Mid Managers Bargaining Unit
Tracy Police Management Association
Tracy Police Officers’ Association
Tracy Technical and Support Services Employee Association There was
no public comment.

ACTI
ON: Motion was made by Council Member Evans and seconded by Council Member Arriola to recess to closed session. Roll call found Council Members Arriola, Bedolla, Evans and Mayor Pro Tem Davis in favor; passed and so ordered.

Mayor Young participated virtually. Time: 5:06 p.m.

Counci
l Member Bedolla arrived at 5:06 p.m.

5. Reconv
ened to Open Session – Time: 5:57 p.m.

6. Report
of Final Action – None

7. Council Items and Comments – None

8. Adjournment – Time: 5:58 p.m.

ACTION: Motion was made by Council Member Arriola and seconded by Council Member Bedolla to adjourn. Roll call found Council Members Arriola, Bedolla, Evans, and Mayor Pro Tem Davis in favor; passed and so ordered. Mayor Young participated virtually.

Special Meeting Minutes 2 February 7, 2023
The above agenda
was posted at the Tracy City Hall on February 2, 2023. The above are action minutes. A recording is available at the office of the City Clerk. ____________________________
Mayor

ATTEST:
___________________________
Cit
y Clerk

SPECIAL CONCURRENT MEETING MINUTES OF THE TRACY CITY COUNCIL AND

THE TRACY TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
February 7, 2023, 6:00 p.m.

Tracy City Hall, 333 Civic Center Plaza, Tracy, CA.

1. Mayor
Pro Tem Davis called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.

2. Roll
call found Council Members Arriola, Bedolla, Evans, and Mayor Pro Tem Davis present. Mayor Young participated virtually.

Roll
call found Transportation Advisory Commissioners Rajpal Dhillon, Sharanjit Dhillon, Francis, Vice Chair Silva and Chair Cooper present.

3. ITEM
S FROM THE AUDIENCE – None

4. DISC
USSION ITEMS:

4.A The Trac
y City Council and the Tracy Transportation Advisory Commission, Concurrently, Conduct a Workshop to Discuss and Provide Feedback on the City’s Local Roadway Safety Plan.

Anju
Pillai, Senior Civil Engineer provided the staff report and introduced Darryl DePencier, Kimley-Horn who provided the presentation and responded to questions.

Counci
l and Commission questions followed.

Robert
Tanner asked if this is the first portion of the preliminary analysis and when is the final plan put in effect. The workshop is to add or take away ideas and then come up with a final plan to use for grants and was surprised it is all inclusive.

Frederi
k Venter, Kimley-Horn responded to questions.

Mic
hael Rogers, City Manager provided input on the item.

Dott
y Nygard shared concerns regarding the increase of truck traffic, incidents with truck traffic, enforcing truck routes, ticketing those that are not following the designated truck routes and would like to see that data included. Ms. Nygard spoke about bicycle traffic, the need to implement share road signage and requested an expansion of green lanes in the Northeast corner part of town which is missing safety messages for bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Also need more public input, participation and communication.

Cit
y Council and Transportation Advisory Commissioner questions and comments followed.

Koosun
Kim, Senior Engineer provided input.

Counci
l provided feedback on the City’s Local Roadway Safety Plan.

Special Meeting Minutes 2 February 7, 2023

5. COUNCIL ITEMS AND COMMENTS – None

6. ADJOURNMENT – Time: 7:02 p.m.

ACTION: Motion was made by Council Member Arriola and seconded by Council Member Evans to adjourn. Roll call found Council Members Arriola, Bedolla, Evans, Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Mayor Young, Transportation Advisory Commissioners Rajpal Dhillon, Sharanjit Dhillon, Francis, Vice Chair Silva and Chair Cooper in favor; passed and so ordered.

The above agenda was posted at the Tracy City Hall on February 2, 2023. The above are action minutes. A recording is available at the office of the City Clerk.

____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:

___________________________
City Clerk

TRACY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

February 7, 2023, 7:00 p.m.

City Hall, 333 Civic Center Plaza, Tracy Web Site: www.cityoftracy.org

Mayor Pro Tem Davis called the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m.

Pastor Kal Waetzig, Saint Paul’s Lutheran Church provided the invocation.

Roll call found Council Members Arriola, Bedolla, Evans, Mayor Pro Tem Davis, and Mayor Young present. Mayor Young participated virtually.

Michael Rogers, City Manager presented the Employee of the Month Award for February 2023 to Andrea Pedigo, Executive Assistant, Parks and Recreation Department.

Mayor Pro Tem Davis presented a Certificate of Appointment to new Parks and Community Services Commissioner Scott Arbogast.

Sekou Millington, Police Chief swore in Mitchell Van Dyk – New Lateral Officer, Octavio Lopez – Promoted to Captain, and Mario Ysit – promoted to Lieutenant.

Michael Rogers, City Manager pulled regular item 3.D from the agenda as there is more work to be done on the item.

1. CONSENT CALENDAR – Motion was made by Council Member Arriola and seconded by Council Member Bedolla to adopt the Consent Calendar. Roll call found all in favor; passed and so ordered.

1.A Adoption of December 21, 2022 Special Meeting Minutes, January 17, 2023 Closed Session Minutes, January 17, 2023 Special Meeting Minutes, January 17, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes, January 30, 2023 Closed Session Minutes and January 30, 2023 Special Meeting Minutes – Minutes were adopted.

1.B Mak ing findings and re-authorizing remote teleconference meetings of the City Council and all legislative bodies of the City of Tracy for the period from February 8, 2023 through March 9, 2023 pursuant to the Brown Act. – Resolution 2023- 019 authorized the remote teleconference meetings.

1.C Appr
oving a General Services Agreement with Mountain Cascade, Inc. for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Filter Valve Replacement for a term of three (3) months and a not to exceed amount of $166,000. - Resolution 2023-020 approved a General Services Agreement with Mountain Cascade, Inc.

1.D A ppr
oving a Professional Services Agreement with CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. to perform a high-level analysis of Tracy Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion to 16 million gallons per day for a period of three (3) months and a total not to exceed amount of $110,000- Resolution 2023-021 approved a Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc.

Regular Meeting Minutes 2 February 7, 2023

1.E A pproving a Professional Services Agreement with Guidepost Solutions, LLC for the design of the Security System Implementation of the City’s Water Facilities Project (CIP 75169) for a period of five (5) months and a total not-to-exceed amount of $53,290..– Resolution 2023-022 approved a Professional Services Agreement with Guidepost Solutions, LLC.

1.F A ppr oving a General Services Agreement with Telstar Instruments for the Programmable Logic Controller and Primary Effluent Pumping Control Upgrade Project for a term of nine (9) months and a total not to exceed amount of $293,250.– Resolution 2023-023 approved a General Services Agreement with Telstar Instruments.

1.G A ppr ove the Inspection Improvement Agreement between City and Lennar Homes of California, LLC for Corral Hollow Road Widening Improvements at Tracy Hills Phase 2 Frontage.– Resolution 2023-024 approved the Inspection Improvement Agreement with Lennar Homes of California, LLC.

1.H Adopt two resolutions: (1) Approving a Professional Services Agreement with CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. for the design of a recycled water booster pump station for the Recycled Water System Expansion Project (CIP 74168) for a term of five (5) months and a not to exceed amount of $1,240,000; and (2) Approving a Professional Services Agreement with CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. for the design of recycled water pipelines for the Recycled Water System Expansion Project (CIP 74168) for a term of five (5) months and a not to exceed amount of $1,860,000.– Resolution 2023-025 approved a Professional Services Agreement with CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. for design of a recycle water booster pump station. Resolution 2023-026 approved a Professional Services Agreement with CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. for design of recycled water pipelines.

2. IT
EMS FROM THE AUDIENCE – Karen Moore stated this weekend Council had a workshop and asked if there is a video or minutes for the workshop to know if there was any decisions made and what was discussed.

Wes Huffman spoke about human behavior, saw an example at the Black History Month ceremony and hoped to see that every meeting. Mr. Huffman stated in two weeks he will wanted Council to vote yes or no to give poles to the American Legion for Memorial Day.

Mr. Huffman also stated he is interested in changing the City campaign rules. The last campaign did not demonstrate good human behavior.

Vijay Pasapula, volunteer for Hindu Swayam Sevak Sangh USA, shared information regarding two activities recently conducted: SewaDiwali Food Donation Drive and the Health for Humanity Program, Surya Namaskar Yogathon and requested the City inform them of any volunteer opportunities as they are eager to get involved and offer support.

Sarah Wood, Board Member for Better World Rescue in Tracy stated she is a volunteer for the Tracy Shelter and shared information about the various programs she has worked with at the shelter. Ms. Wood requested a budget increase from $15,000 to $20,000 to help reduce the population of feral cats in Tracy and help the shelter neuter return program as the shelter is running out of funding.

Regular Meeting Minutes 3 February 7, 2023

Natasha Perez, Better World Rescue stated Tracy Animal Shelter is a role model for other shelters in this area and spoke about grants for community feral program. Ms. Perez suggested giving the shelter the requested $15,000 - $20,000 for the shelter neuter return program. The best thing to do is to fix them so they don’t continue to reproduce and the City will have a decline in kittens.

Rehan Anwar spoke about a giant tree causing a nuisance on the corner of Byron Ave and Belconte. People are using the tree as a shelter and doing illegal activities. Kids want to enjoy their home but are not able to utilize that and are afraid to go out.

Tim Silva thanked Council for including the Transportation Advisory Commission in the LSRP special meeting, will produce more positive results and outreach to the community.

Mr. Silva thanked Chief Millington for his efforts and the job he has done in community adding he is a great advocate to and for the community and he is proud of the Police Department.

Gotham spoke about the SewaDiwali in November and December and the Sun Salutation in January and requested the City Council inform Hindu Swayam Sevak Sangh (HSS) of any volunteering opportunity as the organization is eager to work with the community.

Robert Tanner stated in the last four days the City has had five meetings and on Saturday and Sunday paid money to Home2 Suites to hold a Council workshop. Mr. Tanner shared his concerns with not using City facilities for workshops and spending money for offsite meetings.

Gabriella Machucca stated she spoke at the last meeting regarding her food trailer and is now dealing with State Agency which is also based from the same miscommunication.

The State Agency is stating the City of Tracy Planning only approved a CUP for temporary use permit. They are being misinformed and she is dealing with that right now.

A District Representative for Congressman Josh Harder reminded constituents of Tracy that they continue to represent them in Congress and can help them navigate Federal agencies and provided contact information.

3. REGULAR AGENDA

3.A S taff recommends that the City Council receive the annual informational report regarding the City of Tracy’s Senior Services Program for 2022.

Amanda Jensen, Recreation Program Coordinator provided the staff report.

There was no public comment.

Council comments and questions followed.

Council received the annual informational report regarding the City of Tracy’s Senior Services Program for 2022.

Regular Meeting Minutes 4 February 7, 2023

3.B Discuss and provide direction, by motion, that 1) the City not advance the establishment of a Government Accountability Commission at this time and 2) the City Manager return with an agenda item for the City Council to consider the establishment of an Environmental Sustainability Commission.

Karin Schnaider, Assistant City Attorney provided the staff report.

Karen Moore spoke about creating smart goals and achieving much of what is in the City’s Sustainability Action Plan. Ms. Moore shared information regarding programs that include funding, goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, referred to the Inflation Reduction Act and shared information regarding two programs (HOMES and HEEHRA), and believed the City can benefit from an Environmental Sustainability Commission and reach goals set forth in the plan.

Robin Cole referred to the committees and stated staff has had 2.5 years to work on one program and a year to work on the other. If deadlines are not required when deliverables are due, then it won’t happen. If staff does have to bring it back to do more work, she recommended it be a short timeline to return to citizens and Council as to what and how they are going to do it.

Dotty Nygard stated the City has been talking about a Sustainability Action Plan for years, and how vital this commission could be as a conduit to educate and inform to meet mandates with SB 375 and SB 1000. This would be a very vital compliment to all the hard work staff does and have a group that can focus on environmental issues and finding funding and opportunities.

Tim Silva stated he disagrees with the Government Accountability Commission.

He does not see any racial components in the City where people are not being hired because of their race. Mr. Silva shared concerns regarding consultant Darlene Flynn who previously presented on race, equity, and local government.

Robert Tanner responded to Mr. Silva’s comments stating the agenda item is to not establish a Government Accountability Committee.

A sophomore student expressed her strong belief of execution of the Environment Sustainability Action Committee and spoke about the benefits of the committee for the community. Shared support for the Environmental Committee.

Council questions and comments followed.

ACTION: Motion was made by Council Member Arriola and seconded by Council Member Bedolla for the City Manager to return with an agenda item for the City Council to consider the establishment of a Government Accountability Commission.

The motion was clarified and Council Member Bedolla withdrew his support of Council Member Arriola’s motion.

Mayor Young seconded Council Member Arriola’s motion for the City Manager to return with an agenda item for the City Council to consider the establishment of a Government Accountability Commission. Roll call found Council Member Arriola Regular Meeting Minutes 5 February 7, 2023

and Mayor Young in favor. Council Members Bedolla, Evans and Mayor Pro Tem Davis opposed. Motion failed.

ACTION: Motion was made by Council Member Arriola and seconded by Council Member Bedolla for the City Manager to return with an agenda item for the City Council to consider the establishment of an Environmental Sustainability Commission. Roll call found all in favor; passed and so ordered.

3.C City Council 1) approve a resolution to form a standing committee of the Tracy City Council on Fiscal Sustainability (Committee) and 2) appoint, by motion, two members, to the Committee for an annual term, pursuant to the City Council’s appointment procedures.

Karin Schnaider, Assistant City Manager provided the staff report.

There was no public comment.

Council questions and comments followed.

It was Council’s consensus to form a standing committee and broaden the committee name to Finance Committee.

ACTION: Motion was made by Council Member Evans to 1) Adopt a resolution to form a standing committee of the Tracy City Council, the City Council Fiscal Sustainability Committee. 2) Appoint, by motion, two members to the Committee for an annual term.

Bijal Patel, City Attorney clarified there are two separate items/motions.

ACTION: Motion was made by Council Member Evans and seconded by Council Member Bedolla to adopt Resolution 2023-027 to form a standing Finance Committee of the Tracy City Council. Roll Call found all in favor; passed and so ordered.

ACTION: Motion was made by Council Member Bedolla and seconded by Council Member Evans to appoint Council Member Evans and Council Member Bedolla to the Finance Committee for an annual term, pursuant to the City Council’s appointment procedures.

ACTION: Mayor Young made a substitute motion to appoint Mayor Young and Council Member Arriola to the Finance Committee. Council Member Arriola seconded the motion. Roll call found Council Members Arriola, Evans, Mayor Pro Tem Davis and Mayor Young in favor; passed and so ordered. Council Member Bedolla opposed.

3.D S
taff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement with: (1) Tripepi Smith and Associates, Inc. for the performance of community engagement services related to the creation of City Council Districts for a term of ten (10) months and in a total not to exceed amount of $90,000; and 2) National Demographics Corporation for the performance of demographic and mapping services related to the creation of City Regular Meeting Minutes 6 February 7, 2023

Council Districts, for a term of ten (10) months and in a total not to exceed amount of $60,000. – ITEM PULLED FROM AGENDA

DEVIATION

6. COUNCIL ITEMS – Council Member Bedolla stated he wanted to bring an important point to the attention of the Tracy Press adding several citizens have voiced their concerns as of late in regard to the integrity of the reporting specifically on our Council.

Many in the community are relying on the Tracy Press to present Council discussion and decisions accurately. Consensus is while articles are written with a neutral tone there are often inconsistency of order and accuracy of events. This calls in question whether the journalist is truly neutral. It does favor senior Council Members. It simply frames votes as division when there is a simple disagreement. Council Member Bedolla thanked Council for understanding his urgency at last Monday’s special meeting as being scheduled on short notice and as head coach for one of our City’s Junior Warrior League basketball teams he was pressed for time as the meeting overlapped into the practice start time but was able to vote in support of a unanimous Council decision in favor of displaying the Pan African flag on an annual basis. Council Member Bedolla added it is mind-blowing to continue to make progress through unity and bring our communities together especially right now as we celebrate Black History Month. It was an incredible easy decision for him as well as his colleagues just like in 2021 when he voted to raise the LGBT+ and the Gold Star Flag. While small gestures, Council Member Bedolla looks forward with his Council colleagues to making Tracy continuously more inclusive for all walks of life. Council Member Bedolla wished everyone a great Super Bowl weekend.

Council Member Evans stated he received two calls and six complaint letters from the community about interactions happening at the warming center at the Sports Complex.

Last Thursday he met with the City Manager and the Assistant City Manager to discuss this issue and have recommended the City get security out there immediately. Best of intentions but it is the wrong location, and we need to figure it out and protect our kids.

Council Member Evans asked to keep thoughts and prayers with people in Turkey and Syria who have been affected by the disastrous 7.8 followed by a 7.5 earthquake.

Council Member Arriola wished everyone a happy Valentine’s Day and Super Bowl, and happy and safe next couple of three-day weekends.

5. STAFF ITEMS - Michael Rogers, City Manager reported if there is anyone still in need of FEMA assistance with claims related to the winter storm the County has opened a Disaster Recovery Center at 2101 East Earhart Avenue in Stockton that is open from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. daily. This is an opportunity to go there and find out about the different claim processes. Residents can also go to SJReady.org for more details on the resources that are available to support any claims.

City offices will be closed on Monday, February 20, 2023. This closure will not impact Tracer bus service or the overnight warming center.

Mr. Rogers encouraged anyone who is interested in serving in this community to apply for the vacancies on the Measure V Residents’ Oversight Committee, Board of Appeals and Youth Advisory Commission. Visit Cityoftracy.org for more information.

Regular Meeting Minutes 7 February 7, 2023

7. ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE – Dotty Nygard stated the Tracy Earth project has started an environment educational series, first of four series will be held next Saturday.

EBCE is doing a presentation (hybrid) and can be joined also in person at Workvine 209 on Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Council Member Arriola will share his accomplishments over the last two years and wanted to introduce Council Member Bedolla as EBCE representative. Contact [email protected]. City of Tracy is partnering with Tracy Earth project for the Earth Day event on April 29, 2023 from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. downtown. The event will bring up lot of subject topics and lots more information and education for the public and the theme is Power of the Bike.

Counc
il Member Bedolla responded to Ms. Nygard that he will be out of the state this weekend but looks forward to the next one.

Sarah Wood continued with her comments related to the Tracy Animal Shelter and shared her experience regarding trapping and neutering cats, statistics on feral cats survival, and stated Saving Feral is a wonderful organization in Tracy. Ms. Wood stated funding is needed along with the City’s help.

Mayor Young wished everyone a happy Valentines and enjoy Super Bowl and Valentines. Great job Mayor Pro Tem Davis.

Mayor Pro Tem Davis wished everyone good night, thanked staff for their time, and good luck to Mayor Young’s son being a newlywed.

7. ADJOURNMENT – Time: 9:18 p.m.

ACTION: Motion was made by Council Member Arriola and seconded by Council Member Bedolla to adjourn. Roll call found all in favor; passed and so ordered.

The above agenda was posted at the Tracy City Hall on February 2, 2023. The above are action minutes. A recording is available at the office of the City Clerk.

____________________________
Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk
February 21, 2023
Agenda Item 1.B

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution: (1) Authorizing a Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC for diversity, equity, and inclusion consultant services for a total not-to-exceed amount of $166,500 for a one- year term; and (2) Appropriating funding in the amount of $116,500 from the General Fund reserves to the Human Resources operating budget and amend the FY 2022-23 Operating Budget to reflect such appropriation.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item for consideration by the City Council authorizes the C ity of Tracy to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC, attached herein as Attachment A, for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Consultant Services. In July 2022, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for DEI Consultant Services. The City received nine (9) proposals and an internal evaluation and scoring committee identified MGT as the top candidate.

MGT is a qualified professional consulting firm with proven expertise and hands-on experience in developing and implementing DEI programs for local governments. MGT’s scope of work includes conducting an organizational assessment that identifies current barriers and opportunities for supporting an inclusive organizational culture and service delivery model. MGT will also work collaboratively with t he City t o develop an internally focused strategic plan that identifies tailored strategies, actions, and metrics to advance the City’s culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion. The scope of work is outlined in Attachment B.

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize an agreement with MGT for DEI Consultant Services in the not-to-exceed amount of $166,500 for a one-year term, and appropriate funding from the General Fund as outlined in the fiscal impact section.

BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
The City of Tracy is committed to inclusivity and proudly serves its community members, regardless of religion, immigration status, ethnicity, race, disability, gender, sexual orientation, and/or gender identity. In 2020, in the wake of tragedies that sparked nationwide demonstrations and protests for police reform and social justice, the Tracy City Council initiated community forums on race, policing, and impacts to local youth. These forums provided opportunities for residents to voice their concerns and perspectives and hear directly from community stakeholders. In July 2020, the Tracy City Council approved a resolution condemning racial injustice and declaring Black lives matter (Attachment C) and approved the Tracy Equity and Empowerment Initiative (Attachment D) which outlines policies to prevent police violence and implement an equity-based framework for local governance.

To continue the work and vision of the Tracy Equity and Empowerment Initiative, the City issued an RFP for DEI Consultant Services to perform an assessment of the organization, establish key priorities with internal staff and stakeholders, create an action plan t o guide the work, and set measurable outcomes to determine program effectiveness. The RFP was released on Agenda Item 1.B
February 21, 2023

July 25, 2022 and staff held a virtual preproposal meeting on August 9, 2022. The proposal deadline was August 22, 2022 and nine (9) proposals were received. The City formed an internal evaluation and scoring committee to review and rank proposals, and after thorough review and discussion, MGT was selected as the top candidate.

MGT is a qualified professional consulting firm with proven expertise and hands-on experience in developing and implementing DEI programs for local governments. Since 1990, MGT has conducted over
220 studies related to DEI for cities, counties, school districts, higher education institutions, and non-profit organizations. Some of MGT’s California-based clients include the County of Sacramento, County of Santa Clara, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, City of Riverside, and the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

MGT’s
scope of work includes conducting an organizational assessment that identifies current barriers and
opportunities for supporting an inclusive organizational culture and service delivery model. The DEI assessment will evaluate key governance areas including recruitment, hiring, and retention;
promotional and career development opportunities to cultivate leaders; training to increase DEI competencies, skills, and implementation; government transparency; procurement and
budgeting procedures; land use and capital improvements; policing; boards and commissions; communication and public engagement. The formation of an equity commission may also be derived as a recommendation through the DEI assessment.

In addition to
the organizational assessment, MGT will work collaboratively with the City to develop an internally f
ocused strategic plan that identifies tailored strategies, actions, and metrics to advance the City’s culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion. The completion of the proposed sc
ope of work will prepare the City for additional work in the future. Future work may include conducting
an externally-focus DEI assessment with a strategic plan that addresses how
the City may serve and impact its residents with a focus on equity and inclusion.

FISCAL
IMPACT
Funding in the amount of $50,000 is currently available in the Human Resources operating budget. To fully fund the agreement with MGT of America, LLC., staff recommends that the Council appropriate $116,500 from the General Fund reserves to the Human Resources operating budget
and amend the FY 2022-23 Operating Budget to reflect such appropriation.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This agenda item supports the City Council’s adopted Tracy Equity and Empowerment Initiative.

ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution: (1) Authorizing a Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC for diversity, equity, and inclusion consultant services for a total not-to-exceed amount of $166,500 for a one-year term; and (2) Appropriating funding in the amount of $116,500 from the General Fund reserves to the Human Resources operating budget and amend the FY 2022-23 Operating Budget to reflect such appropriation.

Agenda Item 1.B
February 21, 2023

Prepared by: Vanessa Carrera, Assistant to the City Manager Reviewed by: Kimberly Murdaugh, Director of Human Resources Sara
Cowell, Director of Finance
Karin Schnaider, Assistant City Manager
Approv
ed by: Michael Rogers, City Manager
Attach
ments:

A – Cit
y of Tracy Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

B – MGT Proposal for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services C – Resolution 2020-126
D – Tracy Equity and Empowerment Initiative
Rev. June 2016
CITY

OF TRACY

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MGT OF AMERICA CONSULTING, LLC Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services
This Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) is entered into between the City of Tracy, a municipal corporation (City), and MGT of America Consulting, LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation (Consultant). City and Consultant are referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”
Recitals
A. City desires to retain Consultant to perform Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion assessment services and action plan; and
B. On July 25, 2022, the City issued a Request for Proposals to provide such services. The City has determined that Consultant possesses the skills, expertise, and experience necessary to provide such services.

C. After negotiations between the City and Consultant, the parties have reached an agreement for the performance of services in accordance with the terms set forth in this Agreement.

D. This Agreement is being executed pursuant to Resolution No. ____ approved by Tracy City Council on February 21, 2023.

Now therefore, the Parties mutually agree as follows:

1. Scope of Work. Consultant shall perform the services described in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by reference. The services shall be performed by, or under the direct supervision of, Consultant’s Authorized Representative: Patrick Dyer. Consultant shall not replace its Authorized Representative, nor shall Consultant use or replace any subcontractor or subconsultant, without City’s prior written consent. A failure to obtain the City’s prior written consent for any change or replacement in personnel or subcontractor/subconsultant may result in the termination of this Agreement.

2. Ti me of Performance. Time is of the essence in the performance of services under this Agreement and the timing requirements set forth shall be strictly adhered to unless otherwise modified in writing in accordance with this Agreement. Consultant shall begin performance, and shall complete all required services no later than the dates set forth in Exhibit “A.” Any services for which times for performance are not specified in this Agreement shall be started and completed by Consultant in a reasonably prompt and timely manner based upon the circumstances and direction communicated to the Consultant. Consultant shall submit all requests for time extensions to the City in writing no later than ten days after the start of the condition which purportedly caused the delay, and not later than the date on which performance is due. City shall grant or deny such requests at its sole discretion.

2.1 Term. The term of this Agreement shall begin on February 22, 2023 and end on February 22, 2024, unless terminated in accordance with Section 6. This Agreement may be extended for an additional year by the City Manager following a written determination that Consultant has satisfactorily met all the requirements of this Agreement.

ATTACHMENT A
City of Tracy -- Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services

2 3. Compensation. City shall pay Consultant at the billing rates set forth in Exhibit “B,” attached and incorporated by reference for services performed under this Agreement.

3. 1 Not to Exceed Amount. Consultant’s total compensation under this Agreement shall not exceed $166,500. Consultant’s billing rates shall cover all costs and expenses for Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. No work shall be performed by Consultant in excess of the total compensation amount provided in this section without the City’s prior written approval.

3.2 Invoices. Consultant shall submit monthly invoice(s) to the City that describe the services performed.

3.2.1 If Consultant is providing services in response to a development application, separate invoice(s) must be issued for each application and each invoice shall contain the City’s designated development application number.

3.2.2 Consultant’s failure to submit invoice(s) in accordance with these requirements may result in the City rejecting said invoice(s) and thereby delaying payment to Consultant.

3.3 Payment. Within 30 days after the City’s receipt of invoice(s), City shall make payment to the Consultant based upon the services described on the invoice(s) and approved by the City.

4. I ndemnification. Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, defend (with independent counsel approved by the City), and hold harmless the City from and against any claims arising out of Consultant’s performance or failure to comply with obligations under this Agreement, except to the extent caused by the sole, active negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

In this section, “City” means the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers; “Consultant” means the Consultant, its employees, agents and subcontractors; “Claims” includes claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all related costs and expenses) and any allegations of these; and “Arising out of” includes “pertaining to” and “relating to”.

(The duty of a "design professional" to indemnify and defend the City is limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional, under Civ. Code § 2782.8.)

The provisions of this section survive completion of the services or the termination of this Agreement, and are not limited by the provisions of Section 5 relating to insurance.

5. Insurance. Consultant shall, throughout the duration of this Agreement, maintain insurance to cover Consultant, its agents, representatives, and employees in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement at the minimum levels set forth herein.

5.1 Commercial General Liability (with coverage at least as broad as ISO form CG 00 01 01 96) “per occurrence” coverage shall be maintained in an amount not less than $2,000,000 general aggregate and $1,000,000 per occurrence for general liability, bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage.

5.2 Automobile Liability (with coverage at least as broad as ISO form CA 00 01 07 97, for “any auto”) “claims made” coverage shall be maintained in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

5.3 Workers’ Compensation coverage shall be maintained as required by the State of California.

ATTACHMENT A
City of Tracy -- Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services

3 5.4 Professional Liability “claims made” coverage shall be maintained to cover damages that may be the result of errors, omissions, or negligent acts of Consultant in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claim.

5.5 Endorsements. Consultant shall obtain endorsements to the automobile and commercial general liability insurance policies with the following provisions:

5.5.1 The City (including its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) shall be named as an additional “insured.”

5.5.2 For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any insurance maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

5.6 Notice of Cancellation. Consultant shall notify the City if the policy is canceled before the expiration date. For the purpose of this notice requirement, any material change in the policy prior to the expiration shall be considered a cancellation. Consultant shall immediately obtain a replacement policy.

5.7 Authorized Insurers. All insurance companies providing coverage to Consultant shall be insurance organizations authorized by the Insurance Commissioner of the State of California to transact the business of insurance in the State of California.

5.8 Insurance Certificate. Consultant shall provide evidence of compliance with the insurance requirements listed above by providing a certificate of insurance and endorsements, in a form satisfactory to the City, before the City signs this Agreement.

5.9 Substitute Certificates. Consultant shall provide a substitute certificate of insurance no later than 30 days prior to the policy expiration date of any insurance policy required by this Agreement.

5.10 Consultant’s Obligation. Maintenance of insurance by the Consultant as specified in this Agreement shall in no way be interpreted as relieving the Consultant of any responsibility whatsoever (including indemnity obligations under this Agreement), and the Consultant may carry, at its own expense, such additional insurance as it deems necessary.

Failure to provide or maintain any insurance policies or endorsements required herein may result in the City terminating this Agreement.

6. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement by giving ten days’ written notice to Consultant. Upon termination, Consultant shall give the City all original documents, including preliminary drafts and supporting documents, prepared by Consultant for this Agreement. The City shall pay Consultant for all services satisfactorily performed in accordance with this Agreement, up to the date notice is given.

7. Dispute Resolution. If any dispute arises between the City and Consultant that cannot be settled after engaging in good faith negotiations, City and Consultant agree to resolve the dispute in accordance with the following:

7.1 Each Party shall designate a senior management or executive level representative to negotiate the dispute;

7.2 The representatives shall attempt, through good faith negotiations, to resolve the dispute by any means within their authority.

7.3 If the issue remains unresolved after fifteen (15) days of good faith negotiations, the Parties shall attempt to resolve the disagreement by negotiations between legal counsel. If the aforementioned process fails, the Parties shall resolve any remaining disputes through mediation to expedite the resolution of the dispute.

7.4 The mediation process shall provide for the selection within fifteen (15) days by both Parties of a disinterested third person as mediator, shall be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall be concluded within fifteen (15) days from the commencement of the mediation.

7.5 The Parties shall equally bear the costs of any third party in any alternative dispute resolution process.

ATTACHMENT A
City of Tracy -- Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services

4 7.6 The dispute resolution process is a material condition to this Agreement and must be exhausted prior to either Party initiating legal action. This dispute resolution process is not intended to nor shall be construed to change the time periods for filing a claim or action specified by Government Code §§ 900 et seq.

8. O wnership of Work. All original documents prepared by Consultant for this Agreement, whether complete or in progress, are the property of the City, and shall be given to the City at the completion of Consultant’s services, or upon demand from the City. No such documents shall be revealed or made available by Consultant to any third party without the City’s prior written consent.

9. I ndependent Contractor Status. Consultant is an independent contractor and is solely responsible for the acts of its employees or agents, including any negligent acts or omissions.

Consultant is not City’s employee and Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of the City as an agent, or to bind the City to any obligation, unless the City provides prior written authorization. Consultant is free to work for other entities while under contract with the City. Consultant, and its agents or employees, are not entitled to City benefits.

10. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant (including its employees, agents, and subconsultants) shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Agreement. If Consultant maintains or acquires such a conflicting interest, the City may terminate any contract (including this Agreement) involving Consultant’s conflicting interest.

11. Rebates, Kickbacks, or Other Unlawful Consideration. Consultant warrants that this Agreement was not obtained or secured through rebates, kickbacks, or other unlawful consideration either promised or paid to any City official or employee. For breach of this warranty, City shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to terminate this Agreement without liability; to pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or to deduct from the contract price; or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback, or other unlawful consideration.

12. N otices. All notices, demands, or other communications which this Agreement contemplates or authorizes shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or mailed to the other party to the addresses listed below. Communications shall be deemed to have been given and received on the first to occur of: (1) actual receipt at the address designated below, or (2) three working days after the deposit in the United States Mail of registered or certified mail, sent to the address designated below.

To City: To Consultant:

Kimberly Murdaugh Patrick Dyer
333 Civic Center Plaza 4320 West Kennedy Blvd., Ste. 200 Tracy, CA 95376 Tampa, Florida 33609

With a copy to:

City Attorney
333 Civic Center Plaza
Tracy, CA 95376

Communications shall be deemed to have been given and received on the first to occur of: (1) actual receipt at the address designated above, or (2) three working days after the

ATTACHMENT A
City of Tracy -- Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services

5 deposit in the United States Mail of registered or certified mail, sent to the address designated above.

13. M iscellaneous.

13.1 Standard of Care. Unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, the standard of care applicable to Consultant’s services will be the degree of skill and diligence ordinarily used by reputable professionals performing in the same or similar time and locality, and under the same or similar circumstances.

13.2 Amendments. This Agreement may not be modified orally or in any manner other than by an agreement in writing signed by both Parties.

13.3 Waivers. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

13.4 Assignment and Delegation. Consultant may not assign, transfer or delegate this Agreement or any portion of it without the City’s written consent. Any attempt to do so will be void. City’s consent to one assignment shall not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent assignment.

13.5 Jurisdiction and Venue. The interpretation, validity, and enforcement of the Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Any suit, claim, or legal proceeding of any kind related to this Agreement shall be filed and heard in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of San Joaquin.

13.6 Compliance with the Law. Consultant shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, whether or not those laws are expressly stated in this Agreement.

13.6.1 Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates; employment of apprentices (§ 1777.5), certified payroll records (§1776), hours of labor (§1813 and §1815), debarment of contractors and subcontractors (§1777.1) and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the services being performed under this Agreement are part of a “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined in the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. These prevailing rates are on file with the City and are available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents, harmless from any and all claims, costs, penalties, or interests arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

13.6.2 Non-discrimination. Consultant represents and warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Consultant shall also comply with all applicable anti-discrimination federal and state laws, including but not limited to, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code 12990 (a-f) et seq.).

13.7 Business Entity Status. Consultant is responsible for filing all required documents and/or forms with the California Secretary of State and meeting all requirements of the Franchise Tax Board, to the extent such requirements apply to Consultant. By entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is not a suspended corporation. If Consultant is a suspended corporation at the time it enters this Agreement, City may take steps to have this Agreement declared voidable.

13.8 Business License. Before the City signs this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a City of Tracy Business License. Consultant shall maintain an active City of Tracy Business License during the term of this Agreement.

ATTACHMENT A
City of Tracy -- Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services
6 13.9 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

13.10 Construction of Agreement . Each Party hereto has had an equivalent opportunity to participate in the drafting of this Agreement and/or to consult with legal counsel.

Therefore, the usual construction of an agreement against the drafting Party shall not apply hereto.

13.11 Severability. If a term of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Agreement shall be construed as not containing that term, and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect.

13.12 Controlling Provisions. In the case of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the Exhibits hereto, and Consultant’s proposal (if any), the Agreement shall control. In the case of any conflict between the Exhibits hereto and the Consultant’s proposal (if any), the Exhibits shall control.

13.13 Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the attached Exhibits comprise the entire integrated understanding between the Parties concerning the services to be performed.

This Agreement supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements. All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated by reference herein.

14. Signatures. The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement on behalf of Consultant.

The parties agree to the full performance of the terms set forth here.

City of Tracy
_____________________________
By: Nancy D. Young
Title: Mayor
Date: _______________________
Attest:
_____________________________
Adrianne Richardson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
_____________________________
Bi
jal M. Patel, City Attorney
MGT of America, LLC
________________________________
By: Patrick Dyer
Title: Vice President
Date: _______________________
By: Carla Luke
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: ________________________
Federal Employer Tax ID No.
______
Exhibits:

A Scope of Work, including personnel and time of performance (See Agreement sections 1 and 2.)
B Compensation (See Agreement section 3.)
81-0890071
Patrick J.

Dyer
Digitally signed by Patrick
J. Dyer
Date: 2023.02.13
16:05:06 -05'00'
Carla Kay
Luke
Digitally signed by Carla
Kay Luke
Date: 2023.02.13
16:04:47 -05'00'

ATTACHMENT A
City of Tracy -- Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services

7 EXHIBIT A
Scope of Services

SCOPE OF SERVICES

The City of Tracy is partnering with MGT of America, LLC to conduct an organizational assessment that identifies current barriers and opportunities for supporting an inclusive organizational culture and service delivery model. MGT will work collaboratively with the City to develop an internally focused strategic plan that identifies tailored strategies, actions, and metrics to advance the City’s culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work will be conducted through an understanding of the organization, its mission, its history, communities it serves, and a shared vision of a diverse, equitable, and inclusive workforce of excellence.

The scope of work includes performing a DEI assessment of the organization, establishing key priorities with internal staff and stakeholders, creating an action plan to guide the work, and setting measurable outcomes of the program to determine its effectiveness. MGT will evaluate the current landscape of the workforce to develop a city-specific DEI program and prepare a report of findings with recommendations that clearly identify opportunities to strengthen DEI competencies of all City staff. Specific contract deliverables include:

• Development of an internal DEI work plan, project schedule, description of deliverables. • Facilitation of regular inter nal DEI stakeholder meetings. • Documentation of decisions made, action steps, responsibility matrix, and deadlines. • Conduct organizational assessment to de termine strengths, weaknesses, DEI understanding, and readiness to embrace and infuse DEI through all levels of the organization and operations.
• Written analysis of existing organizational strengths and gaps with clear recommendations on how to best build upon strengths that will enhance the organization.
• Develop Staff Outreach Plan to maximize awareness and motivation for internal stakeholders to engage in the feedback portion of the equity audit. • Provide guidance, leadership development, and coaching to executive leadership team, emerging leaders, and other internal stakeholders.
• Deliver of DEI Assessment Report and presentation.
• Design and facilitate a workshop to develop DEI goals for the organization and develop a public statement.
• Develop DEI Action Plan.

Optional Services
• Community Landscape Analysis (community survey, outreach, and focus groups). • DEI Education and Training Plan (DEI Decision Point Guide, evaluation of staff training, DEI executive coaching and training).

TIME OF PERFORMANCE

The term of the Agreement shall begin on February 22, 2023 and end on February 22, 2024, unless terminated in accordance with Section 6 of the agreement. The Agreement may be extended for an additional year by the City Manager following a written determination that Consultant has satisfactorily met all the requirements of this Agreement.

ATTACHMENT A
City of Tracy -- Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services

8 Work plan estimated timeline:

PERSONNEL

Dr. Lamont Brown, Vice President
Juan Osuna, Senior Consultant
David Bushnell, Consultant
Vernetta Mitchell, Director

ATTACHMENT A
City of Tracy -- Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consultant Services

9 EXHIBIT B
Compensation

Based on MGT’s understanding of the project and extensive experience completing similar studies, the proposed contract not-to-exceed amount is $166,500. The cost proposal includes professional fees, technology expenses, travel and accommodations, and other costs (printing, surveys, etc.).

The table below illustrates the cost associated with each task in the proposed work plan. The final cost can fluctuate based on mutually agreed upon changes to the project scope and travel frequency and length.

Work Tasks Cost

1.0 - Project Management & Best Practices Review $12,500

2.0 - Organizational Assessment and DEI Support for Leadership Teams and Committees $134,000

3.0 - DEI Action Plan $20,000
Total Not-to-Exceed Contract Amount $166,500
.

Payment will be remitted to MGT within 30 business days of the City’s receipt of an invoice and supporting expenditure documentation to justify expenses.

ATTACHMENT A
Diversity, Equity,
and Inclusion
Consultant
Services

CITY OF TRACY
Updated Scope of
Work
DECEMBER 9, 2022
Submitted by:

DR. LAMONT BROWNE

VICE PRESIDENT
4320 West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 200
Tampa, Florida 33609
888.302.0899
[email protected]

ATTACHMENT B
Revised Project Schedule

WORK TASKS
2023
Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul.

TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT & BEST PRACTICES REVIEW

1.1 Client Engagement

1.2 Best Practice Landscape Analysis
TASK 2: ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT

2.1 Analysis of Internal Data, Policy, and Practice

2.2 Employee Outreach Plan

2.3 Employee Engagement

2.4 DEI Assessment Report and Presentation
TASK 3: DEI ACTION PLAN

3.1 Future Visioning Analysis

3.2 DEI Action Plan Development

ATTACHMENT B

Scope of Services
TASK 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & BEST PRACTICES REVIEW $12,500

1.1 Client Engagement
MGT prioritizes effective communication with our clients to maximize trust, clarity of project progress and action steps, and ensure timely and successful execution of all components of the project. Regular collaborative engagement in a manner that meets our clients’ availability and interest allows mutual certainty that all aspects of our work align with the organization’s mission and ultimate goals.

DELIVERABLES
 Finalized work plan, project schedule, and description of deliverables Identification of key stakeholders, engagement expectations, responsibilities, and project roles  Facilitation of regular (weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly) meeting agendas and minutes  Meeting documents including PowerPoint presentations and related materials  Documentation of decisions made, action steps, responsibility matrix, and deadlines

1.2 Best Practice Landscape Analysis
MGT will provide an overview of what is considered industry standard DEI best practices that have been utilized in similar organizations with an overview of successes and lessons learned regarding DEI initiatives. This work will help you understand what general best practice is and may inform the potential recommendations that will follow.

DELIVERABLE: Written draft chapter of industry-leading best practices in DEI initiatives

ATTACHMENT B
TASK 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT MIN: $104,000 MAX: $11 9,000 * MGT will conduct an assessment of the organization to determine strengths, weaknesses, DEI understanding, and readiness to embrace and infuse DEI through all levels of the organization’s structure and operations. This will involve an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data and other information to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the state of the organization related to equity.

MGT uses several tools to effectively execute our organizational assessment. In order to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to diversity, equity, and inclusion, MGT operationalizes a policy analysis rubric. Our rubric is rooted in a historic understanding of systemic racism and focuses on hiring, pay and promotion transparency, antidiscrimination, antiharassment, benefits, and good faith efforts. MGT also analyzes EEOC data collected by the City through a combinat ion of SPSS a statistical analysis software, the R language for data manipulation, and Spreadsheet to organize and clean data.

2.1 Analysis of Data, Policy, and Practice
MGT will work with the City’s project leadership to establish a comprehensive list of data , documents, policies, and practices to be included in the assessment with special emphasis on the impact on people from historically marginalized demographic groups. An equity lens will be applied to the following topics:
 Hiring and Development
o Employee and leadership demographics and other trends related to resilient economy and community
o Organization recruitment, hiring and promotion practices and materials o Barriers to recruiting, hiring, and retaining a diverse workforce o Development opportunities and investment into employee growth  Organizational Culture
o SWOT analysis of policies and practices that have a positive or disparate impact on employees with specific focus on employees from historically marginalized communities o Evaluation of leadership DEI acumen and sensitivity
o Government transparency
o Procurement procedures that provide access to minority and women-owned business o Annual budgeting processes
o Approach to land use and capital improvements
o Policing practices
o Diversity of membership and effectiveness of boards and commissions o Quality of communication and public engagement
 Human Resources Policies
o Anti-discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Policies o Formal and informal resources for employees
DELIVERABLE: A written analysis of existing organizational strengths and gaps with clear recommendations on how to best build upon strengths that will enhance the organization

ATTACHMENT B

2.2 Employee Outreach Plan
MGT will design and administer a set of protocols to garner insight of staff and leadership perspective regarding organizational culture, equity in the workplace, and the employee experience. To maximize awareness of the City’s commitment to equity, build interest and motivation to engage in the organization’s DEI-related vision and this assessment, we will create an internal staff outreach plan to boost authentic engagement. This staff outreach plan will provide a strategic road map for informing staff of the importance of their participation.

DELIVERABLE: Staff Outreach Plan to maximize awareness and motivation for internal stakeholders to engage in the feedback portion of the equity audit

2.3 Employee Engagement
MGT will design and administer a set of protocols to garner insight of staff and leadership perspective regarding organizational culture, equity in the workplace, and the employee experience including staff focus groups and a DEI survey. Upon completion, we will evaluate all insight collected to ensure representative participation from all stakeholder groups and re-administer if necessary.

DELIVERABLES
 Focus Group Interview Guide and Protocol
 Organizational Assessment Equity Survey
 Quantitative and Qualitative analysis of survey results

2.4 *DEI Support for Leadership Teams and Committees/Groups Added Charge of $15,000** MGT will provide guidance, leadership development , and coaching to executive leadership team, emerging leaders, and/or or committees from the City of Tracy.

DELIVERABLES
 Shared understanding of DEI concepts and competencies amongst decision making teams  Monthly or as needed meetings to share project updates with key stakeholders and facilitate discussion regarding relevant DEI topics
**Travel for on-site meetings as needed is included in cost

2.5 DEI Assessment Report & Presentation
The assessment concludes with the delivery of a report and oral presentation that provides an overview of our methodology, a comprehensive synopsis of what was learned in the assessment and SWOT analysis, and a review of our recommendations. The presentation will be delivered in a participant-friendly manner to ensure widespread understanding and internalization of strengths, gaps and improvement actions needed to meet the goals and performance expectations of the organization. Ultima tely, the DEI assessment is intended to be used to drive the design and successful implementation a comprehensive multi-year DEI Action Plan that elevates equity through all aspects of the City’s policies and practices.

ATTACHMENT B

DELIVERABLES
 PDF report and live presentation of assessment approach, findings and recommendations  Comprehensive list of recommendations for prioritization of actions to take to elevate equity, access, and opportunity for City employees and stakeholders TASK 3.0 DEI ACTION PLAN $20, 000

3.1 Future Envisioning Analysis
MGT will design and facilitate a workshop with a representative sample of City Commissioners and leadership to conduct future envisioning focused on building themes and initiatives around the desire for the state of equity across the organization. This work will result in the identification of a “North Star” for the organization to strive to become. This North Star will drive the work of the DEI Action Plan.

DELIVERABLE: DEI Goals for the City of Tracy and public DEI statement

3.2 DEI Action Plan Development
The North Star established during the future envisioning analysis will inform the development of a DEI Action Plan that includes a coherent set of strategic priorities and prioritized initiatives that align with the City’s DEI goals. Material gathered from the survey, interviews, and focus groups will drive development of a strategic roadmap for advancing DEI within the organization. MGT will facilitate a series of workshops with a diverse set of the City’s commissioners and leaders to collaboratively build the DEI action plan.

DELIVERABLE: Written action plan document

ATTACHMENT B

**Additional Services Conditional on Results from DEI
Assessment**
Additional Service #1: COMMUNITY LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Stakeholder engagement is a crucial aspect of MGT’s methodology. We engage stakeholders across a multiplicity of engagement options including telephone, email, paper surveys when appropriate, and a Qualtrics web survey. Our survey is a tool that consists of approximately thirty Likert questions related to the quality of DEI at the City. Once the survey responses have been gathered, we analyze the survey data using a combination of the built -in Qualtrics analysis tools bolstered by a program called Dedoose.

Dedoose allows us to efficiently analyze open -ended survey questions while allowing MGT to take an intersectional view of respondent’s experiences with the City. This allows MGT to confidently address not only the biggest opportunities for improvement, but also allows for a robust understanding of how different experiences intersect with one another to create unique experiences for all the stakeholders surveyed.

Task A: Analysis of External Operations
MGT will conduct an external audit of the organization’s policies, practices, and impact on the residents of The City of Tracy . We will determine strengths and weaknesses of the City’s work and identify opportunities for change to elevate its success in ensuring equity for all residents without exception to one’s race, ethnicity, gender, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identify, or religion. MGT builds upon the work of the Government Alliance on Racial Equity (GARE) by paralleling their racial equity tool to identify relevant community partners, qualitative and quantitative data, and specific analysis strategies through the indices of segregation. This will involve an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data and other information to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the impact of the Cit y’s work related to ensuring equity. A sample of the items for analysis are as follows:
 External Operations
o Community engagement
o External communications
o Interactions between the City and its residents
o Breadth and access to community support programming
 Policies and practices that have a disparate impact on people from traditionally marginalized communities using MGT’s Indices of Systemic Oppression which include the following:
o Access to Healthcare – locations of hospitals and free clinics, and the demographic makeups with easy access to these services.
o Neighborhood & Built Environment – The actual infrastructure of different neighborhoods and along with understanding the proximity of different demographics to capital improvements

ATTACHMENT B
o Social & Community Context – refers to the actual demographics of a community along with the histories and policies that directly impact them. o Economic Stability – The economic opportunities that are afforded to the residents of a region including data related to employment, income, coupled with select demographic indicators.
o Education Access & Success – relates to information typically housed in the school district including student demographics, graduation rates, and funding.  MGT will analyze external data points of the City of Tracy community to identify inequities in practice and/or disparities that are impacting the residents of the City. Using ACS (American Community Survey) and Census data, we will be able to provide a current picture of the state of eq uity throughout the City. We will use this analysis to craft a concise reader -friendly presentation for the organization to use to drive its DEI goals and action plan.

DELIVERABLES
 Mixed Methods report detailing the current state of the indices of systemic oppression  A maturity model to demonstrate where the City is on its anti-racism journey  Gap analysis and recommendations to address shortfalls within the indices Task B: Focus Groups with Local Content Experts
MGT will conduct a series of focus groups and/or 1:1 interviews with key local experts who demonstrate a thorough understanding of the community and the juxtaposition of its history and its present. We will seek to understand barriers and opportunities regarding pervasive inequities that are relevant to the community served by the City of Tracy . In order to provide a more comprehensive assessment that is contextualized with a 360 -degree perspective, we will seek insight from a sample of members of the following local experts:
o Local historians
o Educators (PK-12 and Higher Education)
o Business Leaders
o Healthcare providers
o Community Based Organizations
o Organizational department/division heads

DELIVERABLES
 Focus group and/or 1:1 interview guide
 Summary report of feedback and insight gained from content experts Task C: Community Outreach Plan
To maximize awareness of the City’s commitment to equity, build interest and motivation to engage in the City’s DEI -related vision and this equity audit, we will create an external outreach plan to boost meaningful engagement in the audit process. This external stakeholder outreach plan will provide a strategic road map for informing the City’s residents of the importance of their participation. We will bring a unique perspective and a set of strategies to in crease participation and receptivity to this important work.

DELIVERABLE
 External Stakeholder Outreach Plan to maximize awareness and motivation for internal stakeholders to engage in the feedback portion of the DEI Assessment

ATTACHMENT B
Task D: Community Engagement
MGT will design and administer a set of protocols aimed at maximizing participation of City’s residents to allow us to gain comprehensive and accurate insight of the resident perspective on equity in the City. We will utilize some or all of the following engagement channels for stakeholders to use:
1) A phone-accessible voicemail
2) An e-mail inbox system (ex. [email protected]) 3) Focus groups with leaders and representatives of local community-based organizations 4) A series of community meetings that are open to all City residents and community members (in- person or remote as appropriate)
Upon completion, we will evaluate all insight collected to ensure representative participation from all stakeholder groups and re-administer with targeted outreach if necessary.

DELIVERABLES
 Focus Group Interview Guide
 Demographic data summary of resident participation
 Quantitative and qualitative analysis of feedback results

ATTACHMENT B
ADDITIONAL SERVICE # 2: DEI EDUCATION AND TRAINING PLAN MGT believes that high quality staff training can elevate and accelerate the City’s commitment to promote and sustain a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Dr. Browne, the project’s executive has nearly two decades of experience designing meaningful, practical, and participant-centered training that meets staff where they are, while engaging them in fun, thought-provoking activities, conversations, initiatives that challenge people in a way that is inclusive, empathetic, patient, and understanding, with a sense of urgency. We believe that A) Learning is most effective when participants engage in multiple “at-bats” to practice what they’ve learned and B) Impact is maximized when learning is translated into action. To this end, each session will be composed of training facilitation, live practice, and action planning.

A key differentiator that separates MGT’s adult learning approach from other companies is the critical marriage between content knowledge and pedagogical expertise. While many consultants and trainers are competent in what participants need to learn, very few ar e skilled in the art of instruction and adult learning. Our training team includes DEI content experts as well as instructional specialists who are adept at delivering engaging sessions that create a safe space for participants to be honest, respectfully critical, self-reflective, and driven to maximize impact.

Task A: Development of DEI Decision Point Guide
In order to ensure that policy changes, budget development, and other key decisions are made with DEI in mind, we will create a customized DEI Decision Guide which will serve as a tool that the City can use to apply a DEI lens to actions taken by leaders. This will ensure a general ‘best practice’ type of approach for leaders to use in the decision-making process.

DELIVERABLES
 A 1-2 page DEI Decision Point Guide
 Training on how to use the Decision Point Rubric with a practice case study Task B: Evaluation of Staff Training Needs
MGT will use the DEI Action Plan progress assessment, past learning experiences, and solicited information from staff and leaders to determine ongoing DEI training and/or executive coaching needs.

This will inform the design of ongoing training opportunities for new or existing employees that are necessary to support ongoing and future DEI efforts.

DELIVERABLES
Summary report of staff, leadership, and Board training needs DEI training topics, summary, objectives, and intended outcomes Training delivery schedule with locations and participant list Task C: DEI Executive Coaching & Training
MGT will design and facilitate individual coaching and team and organizational wide training on pertinent DEI topics. Because we believe in making ourselves obsolete, we design our session in a way that allows The MGT
Difference

ATTACHMENT B
our clients to own their learning. Our train -the-trainer materials will be shared with the City leadership so that they can continue training new and existing employees to have greater self -awareness of their biases, implicit or otherwise, know how to function with an equity lens, and act in a manner that provides a sustainable culture of DEI throughout the organization for years to come.

DELIVERABLES
1:1 executive coaching for leaders on industry leading and innovative DEI practice DEI training materials including but not limited to participant guide, presentation slides and videos, and facilitation guidebook
Train-the-trainer materials that allows the City to own the learning and continue the learning journey with meaningful impact last after the MGT contract is complete Participant satisfaction surveys and survey results for each training session (results to be used to hold MGT accountable to exceptional performance).

Training sessions to include the following topics as well as the topics and session descriptions listed on the following page.
❖ Implicit Bias: Meaning, impact, and how to recognize and manage it ❖ Community Engagement: Best practices for soliciting public input from hard -to-reach populations
❖ Systemic Racism: What is it and how to recognize it
❖ Micro-Aggressions: How to recognize them and respond appropriately when encountering them
❖ Cultural Awareness and Inclusion: How to understand and create a safe space for people from different backgrounds so they feel ling they belong on the team or in the organization ❖ Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation: Select topics on the importance of LGBTQIA+ representation and effective inclusion strategies
❖ Avoiding Ableism: Provide leadership with strategies to attract, retain and support people living with various disabilities
❖ Neurodiversity: Understanding the needs of neurodiverse populations and how to include and maximize neurodiverse members of the team.

ATTACHMENT B

EXAMPLE OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OPTIONS
Exploring the Benefits of a DEI-Driven Organization
Description: Organizations that genuinely and meaningfully focus on employing a diverse staff and establishing and sustaining a culture of equity and inclusion experience significant improvements in employee engagement and retention, service delivery, financial health, and student success and satisfaction. This session will examine the benefits of being a DEI-driven organization.

Objectives: Participants will be able to…
• Increase awareness and sensitivity to diversity, equity, and inclusion and its impact on people in society and in the workplace
• Demonstrate the knowledge and understanding required to create a welcoming and inclusive environment across the organization
• Articulate how a focus on DEI can improve outcomes for employees and residents

Creating a Culture of Awareness and Inclusion
Description: While subject matter expertise is important, effective leaders also possess ever-growing cultural awareness that allows them to understand the motivations and sensitivities of others so that all stakeholders of the City can feel safe, cared for, and comfortable being authentic.

Objectives: Participants will be able to…
• Understand and articulate how political, cultural, social, and economic issues affect teams, organizations, and society
• Identify the impact of bias in the workplace and communicate strategies to create a safe and objective environment
• Self-assess and acknowledge their personality traits and leadership style and the impact it has on their team’s culture and employee experience

Maximizing Diversity and Difference
Description: This session will enhance the capacity of senior leaders to have the awareness to understand difference, value diversity, and create a culture of inclusion so that all employees and key stakeholders feel emotionally safe, respected, and comfortable being authentic in the workplace.

Objectives: Participants will be able to…
• Explain the importance of developing and sustaining various types of diversity on employee teams • Understand and articulate how implicit bias impacts people effectiveness and team success • Identify and execute strategies that foster a culture of inclusion and ensure an emotionally safe environment for all employees
• Model and hold people accountable for ensuring fair treatment and opportunity for employees.

ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION 2020- 126

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TRACY IN SUPPORT OF RACIAL

JUSTICE AND DECLARING BLACK LIVES MATTER
WHEREAS, the City of Tracy is committed to ensuring that its residents prosper and enjoy a sense of safety as they live, work and play in Tracy, and WHEREAS, that commitment extends to all residents regardless of race, and WHEREAS, the tragic death of George Floyd in Minneapolis on May 25, 2020 at the hands of police officers ignited protests across the country including the City of Tracy in which demonstrators demanded justice for the deaths of Mr. Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and far too many other Black Americans during encounters with police, and WHEREAS, these deaths have sparked a national conversation about policing, systemic injustice, race and a recognition that that our country' s promise of equity and justice remains unfulfilled for many Black Americans, and
WHEREAS, the City of Tracy is listening to the demands of residents and protestors who are demanding that the City take action to change policies to prevent violent encounters with the police and modify practices to strengthen relationships between police and Black Americans, as well as all people of color in Tracy, and
WHEREAS, the City of Tracy recognizes that racism, not race, causes disproportionately high rates of homelessness, incarceration, poor education, health issues, including mental health, and economic hardship for Black and Brown Americans, and WHEREAS, Tracy Police Department' s policies and staff have demonstrated a commitment to positive policing in our City, and
WHEREAS, the City is actively reflecting and identifying how it can promote racial justice through concrete actions, policies and practices that dismantle systemic racism in order to bridge the gap between our values and reality, and
WHEREAS, the City of Tracy commits to holding elected officials, public safety officers, and community leaders accountable for their actions to promote racial justice and ensure the promise of public safety and prosperity is accessible for all, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Tracy does hereby affirm its support of racial justice, stands in solidarity with the Black community, and do all things necessary to resolve as follows:

1. The City of Tracy supports racial justice and condemns racism and prejudice;

2. The City of Tracy condemns the use of unlawful excessive force by the police;

3. The City of Tracy declares that Black lives matter; and

4. The City of Tracy will develop policy through a comprehensive racial equity lens to ensure the social, economic, and physical well- being of the Tracy community regardless of race.

ATTACHMENT C
Resolution 2020- 126

The foregoing Resolution 2020- 126 was passed and adopted by the Tracy City Council on the 7th day of July, 2020, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ARRIOLA, RANSOM, VARGAS, YOUNG, RICKMAN NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
MAYOR
ATTEST:
r

C Y CLERK

ATTACHMENT C

TRACY EQUI

TY & EMPOWERMENT INITIATIVE
POLICY PROPOSALS FOR EQUITY & JUSTICE REFORM IN THE CITY OF TRACY.

JUNE 2020
SUBMITTED BY:

DAN TAVARES ARRIOLA

COUNCILMEMBER, CITY OF TRACY

RHODESIA RANSOM

COUNCILMEMBER, CITY OF TRACY

ATTACHMENT D
TRACY EQUITY & EMPOWERMENT INITIATIVE:

POLICY PROPOSALS FOR EQUITY & JUSTICE REFORM IN THE CITY OF TRACY I. INTRODUCTION
“From the b
eginning of the formation of the United States, government played an instrumental role in creating and maintaining racial inequities.”1 Despite progress, “many overtly discriminatory policies became illegal, but racial inequity nevertheless became embedded in policy that did not name race explicitly, yet still perpetuated racial inequities… Now, with a growing movement of government leaders examining the racial impacts of public policy on their communities, there is tremendous opportunity for the development of active policies, practices, and procedures that advance racial equity.” 2 Failing to address this issue and take action now increases the risk that injustices and inequality may occur for the most disproportionately affected groups in our community.

The policies proposed herein will address the historical factors that contribute to systemic racism and recommend strategies for dismantling such institutions and securing justice and equality for all in our community.

The City of Tracy is not immune to the existence of racism or the expression of anti-Black sentiments. Tracy was formerly one of two headquarters for the NSWPP (National Socialist White Peoples Party), a neo-Nazi group believed to have been active up until the 1980s. 3 The purpo
se of this proposal is to establish a framework that will promote racial and social equity in the City of Tracy—across its organization, departments, projects, and programs.

Equity should be accessible to anyone who works or engages with the City of Tracy, including—but not limited to — partner institutions, local schools, and beneficiaries of local funds. Injustice of all forms shall be purposefully eradicated through the administration of strategies, policies, and procedures affecting constituents and staff alike. 1 Julie Nelson & Lauren Spokane, “Advancing Racial Equity and Transforming Government,” Local & Regional Government Alliance on Race & Equity, https://www.racialequityalliance.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/02/GARE-Resource_Guide.pdf.
2 Ibid.
3 Sam Matthews, “The Faded History of the Tracy Neofascists,” Tracy Press, August 18, 2017, https://www.ttownmedia.com/tracy_press/our_town/the-faded-history-of-tracy- neofascists/article_7207338c-8387-11e7-b4f6-3f61a6846a65.html.

ATTACHMENT D
II. BACKGROUND

On May 25, 2020, George Floyd, an African-American man, was killed by police during an arrest in Minneapolis, Minnesota. A video recording of the killing, which showed one officer needlessly kneeling on Floyd’s neck for 8 minutes and 46 seconds, quickly circulated around social media platforms and garnered international news coverage. In response to this killing, protests were held in cities throughout the country and the rest of the world.

Afterwards, public polls reported that 67% of Americans believe the criminal justice system favors white people over black people in the United States, an increase from 52% in 2016.
4 This massive shift in public opinion also enhanced engagement in our own community. On May 23, 2020, approximately 300 people—mostly young people —gathered at the intersection of 11th Street and Corral Hollow Road to protest the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police and to support the Black Lives Matter movement.5

To quote one organizer of this demonstration, Manuel Zapata: “People actually care about the issues and specifically how flagrantly wrong this one was… We even saw police officers across the country speaking up and some of them joining protests, so we knew that we had a lot of energy here in Tracy, and wanted to make sure that we could stand in solidarity, just against the negativity in the air, and then the constant stories of police brutality in the media. We just had to do something for our community to show our strength here.” 6 Similarly, on June 3, approximately 550 people marched from Corral Hollow Road along 11 th Street to Tracy City Hall in 103 degree heat.7 Two days later, nearly 100 gathered in front of Tracy City Hall to hold a vigil honoring the lives lost to police brutality, including George Floyd.8 Finally, on June 12, approximately 150 individuals – most of whom were youth activists – marched approximately 2.1 miles from Tracy Sports Complex to City Hall.

There, they expressed their frustration with the criminal justice system and its failure to protect Black lives. The speakers at all of these events emphasized the need for greater engagement with and accountability over local policies and elected officials. The activists urged that the demonstrations could not stop with mere marching and posting on social media, but that they must translate into policy proposals by elected officials at all levels.

While the murder of George Floyd prompted the recent protests, the calls to move towards more just and equitable systems extend beyond that single atrocity. His death was a reminder that government at all levels still has an obligation to ensure equal opportunities and protection under the law, regardless of race, religion, or other characteristics.

4 Jennifer Agiesta, “CNN Poll: Trump losing ground to Biden amid chaotic week,” CNN.com, June 6, 2020, https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/08/politics/cnn-poll-trump-biden-chaotic-week/index.html. 5 Bob Brownne, “Nonviolent Demonstration Echoes Protests Across Country,” TRACY PRESS, June 1, 2020, https://www.ttownmedia.com/tracy_press/news/nonviolent-demonstration-echoes-protests-across- country/article_03f657fa-a45f-11ea-afe4-e36057339cf7.html. 6 Ibid.
7 Ibid.
8 Ibid.

ATTACHMENT D
III. PROBLEM STATEMENT

Given the heightened public opposition to systemic inequality and governmental abuse, the City of Tracy has an opportunity and responsibility to acknowledge, address, and dismantle any structural racism or implicit inequalities that may inherently exist in the City’s own policies, programs, and practices. While our local community may have only limited experiences with overt prejudice in recent years, it is important to acknowledge a historical record that includes both explicit and implicit racism. The City of Tracy must accept the public’s call for action and act now to investigate the impacts of structural racism. The “Tracy Equity and Empowerment Initiative” is the first step towards truly promoting equity and justice in our city.

IV. SOLUTIONS

There is no simple, easy solution for dismantling systemic racism or achieving justice.

However, through its central promotional strategy, the City of Tracy already positions itself as “a great place to live, work, and play.” To this end, the City has been very intentional about efficiently responding to community concerns and continually engaging with residents through open events. Similarly, the Tracy Police Department has a record of fostering strong rapport with locals through its community policing strategy, which pushes officers to stay engaged with and visible in the neighborhoods they protect and serve.

Evaluating city strategies and policies and working together with community members and other stakeholders is integral to securing justice and equality for all in our Tracy community.

A. PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY

Modern police policies have substantially evolved over the history of our nation, and today’s best practices are evolving to acknowledge and address historic systemic racism.

Overwhelming statistical data demonstrates that People of Color, especially Black men, are arrested and convicted of crimes at disproportionately higher rates than other demographic groups. Police reform initiatives encourage law enforcement agencies to evaluate their own roles within the criminal justice system and the resources utilized to achieve such responsibilities, while seeking solutions to achieve justice and equality for all.

On June 10, 2020, the Tracy Police Department issued a press release in response to public demands for action, particularly regarding use of force policies. (See ATTACHMENT A.) It is important for the City Council to adapt and implement these demands in the time to come.

On June 24, 2020, a part-time Professional Standards Officer, responsible for conducting Internal Affairs investigations for the Tracy Police Department, was alleged to be involved in a private Facebook group in which he and others made comments about killing a Black

ATTACHMENT D
Lives Matter activist. The matter is currently being investigated by the FBI, and per the Tracy Police Chief, the individual is no longer serving with the department.

Given the current public sentiment, the City of Tracy has a unique opportunity and obligation to assume a leading role in the movement for greater equity and justice.

Therefore, Councilmembers Arriola & Ransom request the following policy proposals:

● ADOPT POLICIES TO PREVENT POLICE VIOLENCE.

o Substantial research has evaluated how the adoption of various policing practices result in demographic disparities in criminal justice outcomes.

Particularly, evidence-based strategies and policies should be adopted as “best practices” to ensure justice and equality for disenfranchised groups, especially African Americans. Given that research shows that “Black people are three times more likely to be killed by police than their White counterparts,” these restrictions would go a long way towards minimizing systemic disparities and injustices. 9 o Moreover, research strongly indicates that adopting specific use-of-force standards reduces police violence, increases police officer safety, and bears no negative impact on crime rates.10 These policies make officers much less likely to be killed, assaulted, or injured in the line of duty.11

o Any policy reform proposals should be assessed with stakeholder input regarding the reasonableness, practicality, and impact of reform proposals.

● EVALUATE AND CONSIDER COMMUNITY CAMPAIGNS CALLING FOR POLICE REFORM.

o Several initiatives and community campaigns seeking to address police reform have developed in the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd—including the #8CantWait campaign, the #8ToAbolition campaign, and the NAACP “Ten Point Action Plan,” among others. Such initiatives have raised questions as to whether there are areas of policing that are detrimental to community trust or that are cost prohibitive. Key areas that have been considered by these community campaigns include funding reallocations, division of police services from non- criminal services; the elimination of qualified immunity; the separation of police from schools; the repeal of laws that criminalize survival—such as anti -homeless ordinances; and the development of a “care, not cops” doctrine. 9 Campaign Zero, “Policy Analysis.”
10 #8CantWait, “The Research Basis for More Restrictive Use of Force Standards,” CAMPAIGN ZERO, June 3, 2020, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XS-frPPH7cSDf5ovsj6RG4z4ukMlozPxLki7WjBnK_Q/. 11 Campaign Zero, “Police Use of Force Policy Analysis,” September 20, 2016, CAMPAIGN ZERO, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56996151cbced68b170389f4/t/57e1b5cc2994ca4ac1d97700/1474 409936835/Police+Use+of+Force+Report.pdf.

ATTACHMENT D

o Specifically, the community sentiment has generally expressed a call to action for adoption of the “#8CantWait” policy proposals:

▪ Clarifying Duty to Intervene Standards
▪ Requiring De-Escalation Training and Policies
▪ Requiring a Clear Use-of-Force Continuum
▪ Requiring All Force Be Reported
▪ Requiring Warning Before Shooting
▪ Exhausting All Alternatives Before Shooting
▪ Prohibiting Shooting at Moving Vehicles
▪ Prohibiting Chokeholds & Strangleholds

“POLICE DEPARTMENTS THAT

PLACE CLEAR RESTRICTIONS ON

WHEN AND HOW OFFICERS USE

FORCE HAD SIGNIFICAN TLY FEWER

POLICE KILLINGS THAN THOSE THA T

DID NOT HAVE THESE LIMITS IN
PLACE .”
12 o The Tracy Equity & Empowerment Initiative calls for a study and evaluation of these community campaigns with a response for their viability and effectiveness from the Tracy Police Department in the near future.

● REVIEW TRAINING FOR TRACY POLICE OFFICERS & REQUIRE
IMPLICIT BIAS AND CULTURAL COMPETENCY TRAINING.

o As policies change, it is imperative that officers receive the training necessary to actualize the goals behind these policies. Some “biases may occur at the implicit level, where people’s subconscious biases guide their choices even when they’re not fully aware of it.”
13 This is critical because “Black people
12 Ibid.
13 German Lopez, “American Policing Is Broken. Here’s How to Fix It,” VOX, September 1, 2017, https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/29/12989428/police-shooting-race-crime.

ATTACHMENT D
account for 31 percent of police killing victims, even though they make up just 13 percent of the US population.”14

o Nonetheless, the optimistic part of all this grim research is that implicit biases may be reduced over time through practice, training, and experience.15

o Notably, EPIC Officers Helping Officers is a training program used in New Orleans, LA. The program—identified in “ Subject to Debate,” Vol. 30, No. 2, a publication of the Police Executive Research Forum—is said to protect officers from inadvertent misconduct by providing practical prevention tools.

o Suggested training should include: implicit bias training; cultural competency training; the benefits of intervention and the legal risks of non-intervention; helping officers identify when intervention is necessary; teaching effective intervention strategies; teaching officers how to accept intervention respectfully; and protecting officers who intervene or accept intervention.

● REVIEW THE CITY OF TRACY’S BUDGET PRIORITIES & CONSIDER INCREASING FUNDING FOR PREVENTATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES.

o There are opportunities to more effectively deploy City resources to respond to community concerns, such as trauma inflicted by violence and addiction.

Such opportunities could include protocols such as sending trauma clinicians as co-responders when police respond to shootings or violent acts. The City of Tracy has an opportunity to better coordinate local resources and institutions. The effective allocation of resources will lead to stronger and safer communities.

o Police officers often “take the place of social workers, emergency medical personnel, and welfare caseworkers,” handling homelessness, drug addiction, and other crises despite inadequate training with any of those societal ills.16 “This moment in time and history gives us a lot of momentum to make everlasting changes within the department.”17 Notably, research indicates that “in a city of 100,000, each new nonprofit community organization leads to a 1.2 percent drop in the homicide rate, a 1 percent reduction in the violent crime rate, and a 0.7 percent reduction in the property crime rate.” 18 14 Lopez, “American Policing,” VOX, September 1, 2017, https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/29/12989428/police-shooting-race-crime. 15 Ibid.
16 Matthew Yglesias, “Growing Calls to ‘Defund the Police’ Explained,” Vox, June 3, 2020, https://www.vox.com/2020/6/3/21276824/defund-police-divest-explainer. 17 Abigail Savitch-Lew, “In New York City, Momentum Behind Cutting the NYPD Budget is Growing,” Jacobin, June 5, 2020, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2020/06/nyc -nypd-city-council-brutality-racism-police-budget. 18 Noah Atchison, Community Organizations Have Important Role in Lowering Crime Rates, Brennan Center for Justice, April 20, 2018, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/community- organizations-have-important-role-lowering-crime-rates.

ATTACHMENT D
“Expanding social and economic programs for under-resourced communities leads to an overall decrease in crime.”19 The City of Tracy has an opportunity to increase support for local organizations engaging in these types of services to further reduce crime and violence in our community.

o The Tracy Equity & Empowerment Initiative calls for a study and evaluation of the City of Tracy’s budget priorities, and consideration of increasing funding towards preventative and support services in the near future.

● ENHANCE TRANSPARENCY AND ACCESS TO PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICIES AND STATISTICS.

o Enhanced transparency in public safety policies with comprehensive and regularly scheduled data and statistics should be made available for the public to review. Such data should include information related to complaints, findings, and other significant statistics.

B. SOCIAL EQUITY POLICY

“Current inequities are sustained by historical legacies, structures, and systems that repeat patterns of exclusion.”20 While progress has been made “in addressing explicit discrimination, racial inequities continue to be deep, pervasive, and persistent across the country. Racial inequities exist across all indicators of success, including in education, criminal justice, jobs, housing, public infrastructure, and health, regardless of region.”21

Generally speaking, the systemic oppression of groups of individuals based on race, gender, sexual orientation, physical ability, age, and other features have resulted in prominent and pervasive inequities in our society. Nonetheless, racial equity can be achieved when “race can no longer be used to predict life outcomes, and outcomes for all groups are improved.”
22 Public policy is the mechanism through which governments have perpetuated racial disparities and injustices throughout the history of our country. As such, public policy has a role to play in reversing that harm and ensuring justice and equality for all in our City.

19 Justin Brooke, Defund the Police Now, The Appeal, June 01, 2020, https://theappeal.org/defund-police- george-floyd/.
20 Julie Nelson & Lauren Spokane, Advancing Racial Equity and Transforming Government, Local & Regional Government Alliance on Race & Equity, https://www.racialequityalliance.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/02/GARE-Resource_Guide.pdf.
21 Julie Nelson & Lauren Spokane, Advancing Racial Equity and Transforming Government , Local & Regional Government Alliance on Race & Equity, https://www.racialequityalliance.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/02/GARE-Resource_Guide.pdf.
22 Julie Nelson & Lauren Spokane, Advancing Racial Equity and Transforming Government , Local & Regional Government Alliance on Race & Equity, https://www.racialequityalliance.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/02/GARE-Resource_Guide.pdf.

ATTACHMENT D
Doing so will require an entire rethinking, reevaluation, and recommitment to ensure that all members of the Tracy community are supported, invested in, and valued—a goal best achieved by embedding an equity framework into every aspect of governance.

Therefore, Councilmembers Arriola & Ransom request the following policy proposals:

● ADOPT AN “EQUITY FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNANCE” TO
ADVANCE EQUITY & JUSTICE IN ALL AREAS OF GOVERNMENT.

o This consistent evaluative lens will ensure the equitable development and delivery of future policies, programs, and services.23

o Such a commitment, in the form of a resolution, will affirm the City’s vision towards achieving social equity. Making a long-term commitment to achieving equity begins with a “declaration that all residents deserve an equitable opportunity to succeed – regardless of their race, color, sex, nationality, sexual orientation, religion, disability, income, or where they live.”
24 o This resolution shall require a commitment to opposing racism and prejudice.

The language should also (1) express a commitment to equity in City contracts and MOUs; (2) promote a safe place for employees and citizens to express concerns regarding our City’s response to issues related to race, sex, age, or sexual orientation or identity; (3) direct the City Manager to develop annual “equity plans,” which would include mandatory training for City employees and department heads; and (4) commit to improving data collection and using equity tools to examine policy and service decisions.

● REQUIRE “EQUITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT” FOR ALL CITY POLICIES, PROGRAMS, AND SERVICES.

o It will allow local “leaders to look intentionally, comprehensively, and systemically at barriers that may be creating gaps in opportunity.”25

o By requiring such analysis, the City Council will be better equipped to introduce and consider legislation to support all Tracy residents. The analysis will evaluate the proposed policy and offer recommendations or explore other policy options when appropriate. The analysis will be required to consider the impact of proposed legislation through an equity lens, including race and ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation and identity, 23 Fairfax County, Virginia, One Fairfax, https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/topics/one-fairfax. 24 Fairfax County, Virginia, One Fairfax, https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/topics/one-fairfax. 25 Fairfax County, Virginia, One Fairfax, https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/topics/one-fairfax.

ATTACHMENT D
socioeconomic status, and geographic location. This analysis should also include an examination of the historical context of the policy in question.

o This requirement will push all government agencies to rethink the way they create and implement policy, while also normalizing and prioritizing equitable outcomes in all public decision-making. Prior to voting on any local legislation, the City Council should know what the proposal will do, how much it will cost taxpayers, and how it will impact all demographics of Tracy residents.

o All municipal departments should also directly consider equity in their decisions. Many cities have initiated work to promote racial equity and social justice throughout their governmental structures. Cities that do not directly address such issues can inadvertently perpetuate harmful educational, health, and financial inequities.

● ESTABLISH A “GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION” FOR THE CITY OF TRACY.

o This commission would make evidence-based recommendations for local reform and monitor outcomes, with special focus on racial equity and social justice. It would also identify existing government policies that could be changed to address historical and contemporary inequities.

o The commission should be composed of individuals with policy-area expertise to study and provide recommendations on how to address the opportunities our City may have to enhance equity in all areas. Areas of interest may include housing fairness and accountability, landlord/tenant laws, environmental justice, and other socially responsible policy practices.

o The commission should collect and use data and metrics, so the City of Tracy can develop equity plans while sharing information, tracking progress, and achieving results.

V. CONCLUSION

Ultimately, the proposed public safety and social equity policies must be prioritized by the City of Tracy to accomplish the goal of achieving justice and equality for all in our City.

Therefore, Councilmembers Arriola and Ransom request that all of these policy proposals be considered and adopted by the Tracy City Council to address the issue of systemic racism and prejudice in our community.

ATTACHMENT D

ATTACHMEN
T A

ATTACHMENT D

ATTACHMENT D

ATTACHMENT D

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY

________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

TRACY CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO. _______________

(1) AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A GREEMENT WITH

MGT OF AMERICA, LLC FOR DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION

CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR A TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT
OF $166,500 FOR A ONE -YEAR TERM ; AND (2) A PPROPRIATING FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $116,500 FROM THE GENERAL FUND

RESERVES TO THE HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATING BUDGET AND
AMEND THE FY 2022 -23 OPERATING BUDGET TO REFLECT SUCH

APPROPRIATION

WHEREAS, the City of Tracy is committed to inclusivity and proudly serves its community members, regardless of religion, immigration status, ethnicity, race, disability, gender, sexual orientation, and/or gender identity; and

WHEREAS, i n July 2020, the Tracy City Council approved Resolution 2020-126 condemning racial injustice and declaring Black lives matter and approved the Tracy Equity and Empowerment Initiative , which outlines policies to prevent police violence and implement an equity-based framework for local governance; and

WHEREAS, t o contin ue the work and vision of the Tracy Equity and Empowerment Initiative, the City issued a Request for Proposals for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Consultant Services to perform an assessment of the organization, establish key priorities with internal staff and stakeholders, create an action plan to guide the work, and set measurable outcomes to determine program effectiveness; and

WHEREAS, the City received nine (9) proposals and an internal evaluation and scoring committee identified MGT of America, LLC (MGT) as the top candidate; and

WHEREAS, MGT is a qualified professional consulting firm with proven expertise and hands-on experience in developing and implementing DEI programs for local governments; and

WHEREAS, MGT’s scope of work includes conducting an organizational assessment that identifies current barriers and opportunities for supporting an inclusive organizational culture and service delivery model; and

WHEREAS, in addition to the organizational assessment, MGT will work collaboratively with the City to develop an internally focused strategic plan that identifies tailored strategies,

Resolution 2023-____

acti
ons, and metrics to advance the City’s culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion; and therefore be it
RESOL
VED: That the City Council of the City of Tracy hereby authorizes a Professional Services Agreement with MGT of America, LLC for diversity, equity, and inclusion consultant services for a total not-to-exceed amount of $166,500 for a one-year term; and be it FURTHE
R RESOLVED: That the City Council hereby appropriates funding in the amount of $116,500 from the General Fund r eserves to the Human Resources operating budget and amend the FY 2022-23 Operating Budget to reflect such appropriation. * * * * * * * * *
* * * * *
The foregoing Resolution 2023-_____ was adopted by the Tracy City Council on February 21, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES: CO
UNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTENTION: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________________
NANCY
D. YOUNG
Mayor of the City of Tracy, California
ATTEST
:

ADRIANNE RICHARDSON
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Tracy, California
February 21, 2023
Agenda Item 1.C

RECOMMENDAT
ION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Master Services Agreement with Crossroads, Inc. for the installation, implementation, training, and annual maintenance of automated traffic collision and citation technology for a term of five (5) years and a total not to exceed amount of $180,000, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any amendments.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This staff report is to prov ide the City Council with background information supporting a services agreement with Crossroads , I nc. for the implementation, training and annual maintenance of traffic c ollision and citation technology for use by the Tracy Police Depart
ment.

BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
In 2021, the Department transitioned from West Covina Service Group’s (WCSG) records management system
and computer aided dispatch system to our current vendor, Mark

43. This
transition helped the Department move closer to its goal of becoming more “paperl
ess” in its record management, however, this left the Department lacking in traffic
collision data to support the Department’s annual report, applications for traffic safety grants, and other statistical data as Mark 43 does not capture or report the information in the manner that WCSG did and requires staff to conduct manual tabulations.

Presently, the Department completes collision reports in two formats. Officers not assigned to the Traffic Safety Unit complete reports on paper forms provided by the California Highway Patrol. Traffic Safety Unit officers complete reports electronically through a separate system called Brazos. Traffic Unit reports are often more complex and lengthier due to the severity of the collision.

Patrol officers and other personnel also issue paper citations, while Traffic Safety Unit officers utilize Brazos and issue electronic citations with a handheld “e-t icket” writer and thermal printer and provide the driver or violator with a paper copy.

As it relates to traffic stops, officers are also required to collect “stop data” under the Racial and Identity Profiling Act or RIPA (PC 13012 and 13519.4, GC 12525.5) currently reported via
Mark 43 software.

ANALYSIS
When the Brazos suite of handheld “e-wr iters” and thermal printers were purchased, the use of the devices was optional and in general officers found the “e-writers” cumbersome and difficult to use due to their design. The “e-writers” were upgraded but only for the Traffic Safety Unit as, at the time, it was viewed they would be the only unit Agenda Item 1.C
February 21, 2023

to benefit from them and because few officers were using them before the upgrade due to the design not
being user-friendly.

Currently, the records department is processing both paper and Brazos generated citations and collision reports. This inefficiency forces staff to input information into the Department’s records management system from two sources, and since the transition to Mark 43, crash data is not captured in the manner it was with WCSG. To provide statistical data for annual reports to Council, other informational requests, and for traffic safety grants, staff is, often times , f orced to hand collect data from c ollision reports. Grant applications typically require several years of statistical history to support a specific request for funding.

Once Crossroads, Inc. is acquired, the use of electronic citations and paperless crash report writing would be implemented Department wide. This would result in standardization across the Department, increased efficiency for the Records Department in collecting and disseminating crash data, increased efficiency for officers in the field, and citations would be submitted to the court system electronically. The Department would no longer incur costs related to ordering standardized state crash forms, and the costs of having Department citations supplied by a printer.

Additionally, the “e-ticket” writer hardware would be condensed into an application used by officers on existing smartphones they are currently issued, and this would reduce the pieces of equipment they are required to carry in the field. Thermal printers originally purchased with the Brazos suite are compatible with Crossroads, Inc. and have an estimated remaining life span of approximatel y three years. It is estimated there is a savings of approximately $45,000 by using the printers the Department already has.

State mandated collection of stop data or RIPA, would also be completed using the Crossroads, Inc. software from the smart phone at the conclusion of a qualifying police contact with a community member and the data would be directly uploaded to the Department of Justice. At point in time, officers are required complete RIPA reports via Mark 43, and traffic safety unit officers do not have this capability in the field as they lack a mobile data computer on their motorcycles, which is cost-prohibitive at this time.

The Department sought out traffic collision software bids through our current vendor, Mark 43; however due to problems encountered by the vendor they were not able to offer a sufficient product. The Department
also researched and reviewed presentations from
two other vendors. Crossroads, Inc. was the sole vendor who offered the full scope of services and interface
with our CAD/RMS system. Pursuant to Tracy Municipal
Code section 2.20.180(b)(2), the formal request for proposals process is not required because Crossroads, Inc. was determined to be a sole source vendor.

FISCAL IMPACT
Total
project costs over a period of five years:
• First-year cost $128,600
• Maintenance $39,000 ($7,800 per year x 5 years)
Agenda Item 1.C
February 21, 2023

Funding is p rovided through the Police Department’s operating budget i n the General Fund.

PUBLIC OUTREACH/INTEREST
The Department is in continuous receipt of feedback from the public regarding traffic concerns and traffic safety. Acquisition of this technology would increase the efficiency in which the Department maintains and accesses, and provides data related to traffic safety to Council,
the public and Department members, and to better deploy its resources to address traffic concerns.

COORDINATION
The Department has coordinated internally among the Bureau of Support Operations, Bureau of Field Operations, and Information Technology, and externally with Mark 43 and Crossroads, Inc.

CEQA DETERMINATION
CEQA is not applicable for this proposed project.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This agenda item relates to Council’s strategic priority for Public Safety.

ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Master Services Agreement with Crossroads, Inc. for the installation, implementation, training, and annual maintenance of automated traffic collision and citation technology for a term of five (5) years and a total not to exceed amount of $180,000, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any amendments.

Prepared by: Erik Speaks, Traffic Safety Unit Corporal
Reviewed by: Beth Lyons-McCarthy, Support Division Manager Sekou
Millington, Chief of Police
Sara Cowell, Director of Finance
Midori Lichtwardt, Assistant City Manager
Approved
by: Michael Rogers, City Manager
ATTACH
MENTS:

Attac
hment A: Master Services Agreement with Crossroads, Inc.

Attachment B: Sole Source Vendor Memo

SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
This Software Maintenance Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between Crossroads Software, Inc. ("Vendor") and the City of Tracy ("Customer").

1. Scope of Agreement
During the term of this Agreement, as set forth in Section 2, Vendor agrees to provide Customer standard maintenance, custom enhancement, online support, and training services, as set forth in Sections 3, 5, 6, and 7, for the computer programs listed in Exhibit A to this Agreemen t (collectively "Software").

2. Term
a. Effective Date: This Agreement shall take effect upon the installation and successful startup and acceptance of the Vendor’s software and remain in effect for a one-year period thereafter.
b. Renewal options: The Customer shall have the right to renew this maintenance agreement on an annual basis, at prices mutually agreed to by the Vendor and the Customer.

Increases in annual maintenance costs shall not exceed 4% per year.
c. Termination Date: This Agreement shall terminate upon the earlier to occur of (i) thirty days written notice from the City, (ii) the effective date of a subsequent agreement concerning maintenance services entered into between Customer and Vendor, or (iii) an event listed in Section 11 below.

3. Standard Maintenance Services
a. Scope of Services. During the term of this Agreement, Vendor will provide Customer the following Standard Maintenance Services for the Software:
i. Corrections of substantial defects in the Software so that the

ATTACHMENT A
Software will operate as described by Vendor in the initial project scope. ii. Periodic updates of the Software that may incorporate (A) corrections of any substantial defects, (B) fixes of any minor bugs, (C) enhancements to provide additional features, and (D) updates to accommodate changes in the state and county court standards for traffic collision reporting, citation writing and changes to interfaces to other systems.
iii. Telephone , email and web support, including dial-up support between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, Monday through Friday, excluding federal holidays, to assist Customer in using the Software.
iv. Guaranteed response time for technical assistance of 4 hours when provided remotely; or 48 hours if required onsite at the City’s facilities.
vi. Online users guides in PDF format, for installation and specific user functions,
b. Services Not Included. Standard Maintenance Services do not include:
i. Charged -for-Enhancements that are offered, at Vendor's sole discretion, to Customers upon payment of an additional fee. ii. Custom Programming Services.
iii. On -site support.
iv. Training.
v. Hardware and related supplies.

4. Charged -For-Enhancements
From time to time, at Vendor's sole discretion, Vendor will make available to Customer Charged-for-Enhancements to the Software that Customer may license from Vendor upon payment of the license fee established by Vendor.

5. Custom Programmi ng Services
Vendor will provide Custom Programming Services to Customer, as agreed to in a written addendum to this Agreement, signed by both parties, that specifies the Custom Programming Services to be provided by Vendor and the fee for the services. Custom Programming Services shall include, but are not limited to, development of custom computer programs and installation, training, and maintenance with respect to such computer programs.

6. On -Site Support
Vendor, upon receipt of a written request from Customer, will provide Customer On-Site Support at a mutually agreed time. Customer agrees to pay Vendor all reasonable costs associated with the provision of on-site support, including charges for (i) Vendor's personnel, (ii) charges for travel, lodging and miscellaneous expenses, and (iii) taxes pursuant to Section 9 below.

7. Training
Upon receipt of a written request from Customer, Vendor will provide Training at a mutually agreed time online or at the Customer’s facility.

Customer agrees to pay Vendor all costs associated with this Training, including (i) charges for Vendor's personnel, which may include a surcharge for training conducted at Customer's location, (ii) charges for travel, lodging and miscellaneous expenses, and (iii) taxes pursuant to Section 9 below.

8. Maintenance Fee
b. Amount of Fee. Customer agrees to pay Vendor a Maintenance Fee, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, plus any applicable taxes pursuant to Section 9 below, for Standard Maintenance Services provided by Ven dor pursuant to this Agreement.
d. Other Charges. Customer agrees to pay Vendor for
Charged-for-Enhancements, Custom Programming Services, On site Support, and Training in the amount and pursuant to the terms set forth in the quotation provided for such services.

9. Payment Terms
a. Due Date. Customer agrees to pay the Maintenance Fee to Vendor on or before the Maintenance Fee Due Date set forth in Exhibit A.

Customer agrees to pay all other amounts due Vendor for services under this Agreement in accordance with the payment schedule set forth on the invoice for the services.
b. Payment Terms. Payment shall be net 30 days in United States currency.
c. Taxes. "Taxes" means all federal, state, local and other taxes, including sales, use and property taxes, related to this Agreement, Customer's use of the Software, or any services provided by Vendor to Customer related to the Software, excluding taxes based on Vendor's net income.

10. Obligations of Customer
a. Customer Contact. Customer shall notify Vendor of Customers designated Customer Contact. To the maximum extent practicable, Customer's communications with Vendor will be through the Customer Contact.
b. Installation. Customer agrees to install all corrections of substantial defects, minor bug fixes and updates, including any enhancements, for the Software in accordance with the instructions and in order of receipt from Vendor.
c. Facility and Personnel Access. Customer agrees to grant Vendor access to Customer's facilities and personnel concerned with the operation of the Software to enable Vendor to provide services.
d. No Modification of Software. Customer agrees not to modify, enhance or otherwise alter the Software, unless and only to the extent specifically authorized in the user manuals identified in Exhibit A or the prior written consent of Vendor is obtained.
e. Error Documentation. Upon detection of any error in the Software, Customer, as requested by Vendor, agrees to provide Vendor a listing of output and any other data, including databases and backup systems, that Vendor reasonably may request in order to reproduce operating conditions similar to those present when the error occurred.

11. Termination
a. Event of Termination. Vendor shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and all services provided pursuant to this Agreement (i) upon termination of Customer's Software License Agreement by either party for any reason, and (ii) if Customer or its employees or agents violate any provision of this Agreement and Customer fails to cure such violation within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from Vendor. b. Procedure. Within ten (10) days after termination of this Agreement, Customer will return to Vendor, at Customer's expense, the Software and all copies thereof, delete or destroy all other Software copies, and certify, in writing by an officer of Customer, that the Software has been returned, all copies deleted or destroyed, and its use discontinued.

12. O wnership
Customer acknowledges that Vendor owns all proprietary rights, including patent, copyright, trade secret and other proprietary rights, in and to the Software and any corrections, bug fixes, enhancements, updates or other modifications, including custom modifications, to the Software.

13. General Provisions
a. Notices. All notices under this Agreement are to be sent by registered mail to the address below or to any other address as the party may designate:

VENDOR: ____Crossroads Software, Inc. ____________
____210 W. Birch St. #207_______________
______________Brea, CA 92821 __________________
CUSTOMER: _____City of Tracy ______________
______1000 Civic Center ____________
________________ Tracy, CA 95376____________
b. Assignment. Vendor will not assign or sublicense, in whole or in part, any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Customer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
c. Complete Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement and Exhibit A set forth the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties.
d. Waiver. The waiver or failure of Vendor or Customer to exercise in any respect any right provided for in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any further right under this Agreement.
e. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal or unenforceable under any applicable statute or rule of law, it is to that extent to be deemed omitted. The remainder of the Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the maximum extent possible.
f. Governing Law. This Agreement is to be construed in accordance with the law of the State of California.

AGREED:

VENDOR:
____________________________
Signature
Jeff Cullen___________________
Name
CEO_______________________
Title
210 W. Birch St. #207, Brea, CA 92821
Address
__________________
Date
____________________________
Signature
__________________
Name
CFO_______________________
Title
210 W. Birch St. #207, Brea, CA 92821
Address
__________________
Date
CUSTOMER:
____________________________
Michael Rogers
City Manager
____________________________
Date
Exhibit A
Software Maintenance Agreement

1. Software Computer Programs:
a. Site License for Crossroads e-Citation System
b. Site License for Crossroads Parking e-Citation System c. Site License for Crossroads Collision Report Writing System d. Site License for Crossroads Analytics System
e. Site License for Crossroads CHP Upload System

2. Effective Date: Upon successful installation, startup and acceptance of software .

3. Termination D ate: Upon expiration date of annual agreement, unless renewed by the City, or terminated earlier in accordance with provisions in Section 11.

4. Annual Maintenance Fee:
a. Site License for Crossroads e-Citation System - $4,900 b. Site License for Crossroads Parking e-Citation System - $2,900

5. Maintenance Fee Due Date: To be invoiced annually, due net 30 days from the beginning date of each annual agreement.
1000 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE  TRACY, CA 95376  VOICE: 209 831 6550  FAX: 209 831 4017

MEMORANDUM
Date: F
ebruary 13, 2023
To: Michael Rogers, City Manager
From Beth Lyons-McCarthy, Police Support Operations Manager Re: Crossroads, Inc.- Sole Source Provider
The police department would like to enter into a five- year Master Services Agreement with Crossroads, Inc. for the installation, implementation, training and annual maintenance of automated traffic collision and citation technology.

In 20
21, the Department transitioned from West Covina Service Group’s (WCSG) records management system and computer aided dispatch system to our current vendor, Mark43.

This transition helped the Department move closer to its goal of becoming more “paperless” in its record management, however, this left the department lacking in traffic collision data to support the department’s annual report, applications for traffic safety grants, and other statistical data as Mark 43 does not capture or report the information in the manner that WCSG did and requires staff to conduct manual tabulations.

Presentl
y, the department completes collision reports in two formats. Officers not assigned to the Traffic Safety Unit complete reports on paper forms provided by the California Highway Patrol. Traffic Safety Unit officer’s complete reports electronically through a separate system called Brazos. Additionally, patrol officers and other personnel also issue paper citations, while Traffic Safety Unit officers utilize Brazos and issue electronic citations with a handheld “e-ticket” writer and thermal printer and provide the driver or violator with a paper copy.

The rec
ords department is also processing both paper and Brazos generated citations and collision reports. This inefficiency forces staff to input information into the department’s records management system from two sources, and since the transition to Mark 43, crash data is not captured in the manner it was with WCSG. To provide statistical data for annual reports to Council, other informational requests, and for traffic safety grants, staff is often forced to hand collect data from collision reports. Grant applications typically require several years of statistical history to support a specific request for funding.

DocuSign Envelope ID: C3DB6A14-FF76-4331-A3FB-73AA3656EB05

ATTACHMENT B
2 | Page
Once Crossroads, Inc. is acquired, the use of electronic citations and paperless crash report writing would be implemented department wide. This would result in standardization across the department, increased efficiency for the records department in collecting and disseminating crash data, increased efficiency for officers in the field, and citations would be submitted to the court system electronically. The department would no longer incur costs related to ordering standardized state crash forms, and the costs of having department citations supplied by a printer.

The department initially sought out Quick Crash, a traffic collision software, through our CAD/RMS vendor, Mark 43; however due to problems encountered by the vendor they were not able to offer a sufficient product. The department also researched and reviewed presentations from Crossroads and Lexis Nex is. Crossroads, Inc. was the sole vendor who offered the full scope of services including electronic traffic reporting, electronic citation writing, and electronic reporting of “stop data” under the Racial
and Identity Profiling Act or RIPA (PC 13012 and 13519 .4, GC 12525.5) to the Department of Justice. This vendor also allowed for Tracy Police Department to utilize its current ticket printers and cellphones to operate the software, which gives the department an upfront cost savings of $45,000.

Purs
uant to Tracy Municipal Code 2.20.1 40(b)(2) the City Manager can approve of dispensing with the request for proposals because the services we require can only be performed by one source.

Thank
You,
Beth L
yons-McCarthy
Police Support Operations Manager
Seko
u Millington
Chief of Police
APPRO
VED:
_________________________________

Michael Rogers
City Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: C3DB6A14-FF76-4331-A3FB-73AA3656EB05

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
________________________

CITY AT
TORNEY’S OFFICE

TRACY CITY

COUNCIL

RESOLUT
ION NO. _______________

APPROVING
A MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CROSSROADS, INC.

FOR THE INSTALLATION, IMPLEMENTATION, TRAINING, AND ANNUAL

MAINTENANCE OF AUTOMATED TRAFFIC COLLISION AND CITATION TECHNOLOGY FOR A TERM OF FIVE (5) YEARS AND A TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $180,000 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Tracy Police Department recognizes the need for standardization in traffic collision reporting, format and processing of parking and t raffic/criminal citations; and WHEREAS, the Tracy Police Department i s not cu rrently abl e to ef ficiently ca pture collision and traffic related data that is supportive for state and federal traffic safety grants; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Tracy Municipal Code section 2.20.180(b)(2), Crossroads, Inc. meets the requirements of a sole source vendor and the formal request for proposals process is not required; and
WHEREAS, the Tracy Police Department has reached a five year Maintenance Agreement for automated traffic collision and citation technology in a total not to exceed amount of $180,000 to provide electronic traffic reporting, electronic citation writing, and electronic reporting of “stop data” under the Racial and Identity Profiling Act or RIPA (PC 13012 and 13519.4, GC 12525.5) to the Department of Justice; and
WHEREAS, the Maintenance Agreement will be funded through the Tracy Police Department’s operating budget in the General Fund; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: That City Council does hereby approve a Master Services Agreement with Crossroads, Inc . for the installation, implementation, training, and annual maintenance of automated traffic collision and citation technology for a term of five years and a total not to exceed amount of $180,000; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any amendments.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTENTION: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________________
NANCY D. YOUNG
Mayor of the City of Tracy, California
ATTEST:

ADRIANNE RICHARDSON
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the
City of Tracy, California
The foregoing Resolution 2023-____ was adopted by the Tracy City Council on February 21 , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Resolution 2023-

February 21 , 2023
Agenda Item 1.D

RECOMMENDATION
Staf
f recommends that the City Council (1) accept the construction for the Pavement Rehabilitation Project, FY 2019-2020, CIP 73176, work completed by Tracy Grading and Paving, Inc., of Tracy, California, (2) authorize the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion, (3) authorize the City Engineer to release the bonds and retention payment, and (4) authorize the Finance Department to close the Project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City
staff requests that the City Council accept the construction for the Pavement Rehabilitation Project, FY 2019-2020, CIP 73176 (Project), as complete. Project costs are within the available budget and work was completed in a timely manner and in accordance with plans and specifications as provided. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the project as complete to enable the City Engineer to release the contractor’s bonds and retention payment.

BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
This
project was part of the City’s annual street improvement program and consisted of pavement reconstruction of Naglee Road (Larch Road to 331 feet south of Larch Road) and asphalt concrete (AC) overlay on Naglee Road (Grant Line Road to Pavilion Parkway), Hollywood Avenue (Holly Drive to Mae Avenue), Mae Avenue (Beverly Place to Eaton Avenue), and 12th Street (Adam Street to Holly Drive), including AC grinding, pavement repair, signing, striping, and traffic signal loop replacement.

Engineer
ing staff prepared the plans and specifications and advertised the Project for competitive bids on May 21, and May 28, 2021. Bids for this Project were publicly opened via Skype Conference on June 21, 2021. On July 20, 2021, City Council approved and awarded a construction contract to Tracy Grading and Paving, Inc., of Tracy, California in a not to exceed amount of $1,338,158, for the construction of the Pavement Rehabilitation Project, FY 2019- 2020, CIP 73176. Additionally, one change order was issued in the amount of $120,273.75.

The change order was for 1) unseen conditions discovered during demolition, 2) additional costs for night construction, as was required by California Department Transportation (Caltrans) encroachment permit, and 3) fluctuations in crude oil prices which impacted the cost of asphalt.

All work was addressed and completed as requested and in compliance with all ADA, Building, and City Standard and Specifications.

The Contr
actor has completed all the work required to be done in accordance with the plans and specifications and has requested acceptance of the project. The City Engineer has inspected the completed work and confirmed that all work conform to the contract plans and specifications.

The proj
ect has been completed within the time frame of the original contract.

ANALYSIS
This
project was part of the City’s annual street improvement program. The street selections Agenda Item 1.D
February 21, 2023

were based on life-cycle and cost-benefit analysis using the City’s Pavement Management Program
and coordinated with the City’s Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Pavement Rehabilitation Project FY2019-2020, CIP 73176, is an approved Capital Improvement Project with a budget of $2,175,000. The total completed cost is $1,582,350, and
was funded through Measure K, Gas Tax and SB1 (Road maintenance and Rehabilitation Account) funds.

Final
project costs were within budget as follows:

A. $ 1,338,158
B. $ 120,274
C.

Construction Contract Amount
Approved Change order
Design, construction management, inspection,
$ 123,918 Testing & miscellaneous project management Expenses
Total Project Costs $ 1,582,350
Total Budget Amount $ 2,175,000
Budget Remaining $ 592,650
The remaining
balances in the project will be released back into fund balance as follows:

Budget Cost Balance
Measure K $ 540,000 $ 82,350 $ 457,650
Gas Tax $ 135,000 $ - $ 135,000
SB1 RMA $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $ -
Totals $2,175,000 $1,582,350 $ 592,650

PUBLIC OUTREACH/ INTEREST
Not-applicabl
e.

COORDINATION
Coordination
between Engineering and Public Works, Street Maintenance Division occurred on multiple occasions to coordinate and establish this project as complete.

CEQA DETERMINATION
Minister
ial Exemption, Code Section #151268.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This agenda item
is consistent with the City Council’s adopted Quality of Life Strategy and meets the goal of enhancing the City’s amenities.

Agenda Item 1.D
February 21, 2023

ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Staff
recommends that the City Council (1) accept the construction for the Pavement Rehabilitation Project FY 2019-2020, CIP 73176, in Tracy, California, work completed by Tracy Grading and Paving, Inc., of Tracy, California, (2) authorize the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion, (3) authorize the City Engineer to release the bonds and retention payment, and (4) authorize the Finance Department to close the Project.

Prepared
by: Leisser Mazariegos, Associate Engineer
Reviewed
by: Koosun Kim, Interim City Engineer
Sara Cowell, Finance Director
Midori Lichtwardt, Assistant City Manager
Approved
by: Michael Rogers, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
________________________
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

TRACY CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTIO
N 2023-_____
(1) ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION PROJECT, FY 2019-2020, CIP 73176, WORK COMPLETED BY TRACY GRADING AND PAVING, INC., OF TRACY, CALIFORNIA; AND (2) AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE THE NOTICE OF
COMPLETION; AND
(3) AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO RELEASE THE BONDS AND RETENTION PAYMENT; AND
(4) AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO CLOSE THE PROJECT.

WHEREAS, on July
20, 2021, the City Council approved and awarded a construction contract to Tracy Grading and Paving, Inc., of Tracy, California (Contractor) for the Pavement Rehabilitation Project, FY 2019-2020, in Tracy, California, CIP Project 73176; and WHEREAS, the
contractor has completed all the work required to be done in accordance with the plans and specifications and has requested acceptance of the project. The Interim City Engineer has inspected the completed work and confirmed that all work conform to the contract plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, One change order was issued as part of this project; and WHEREAS, The status of budget costs is as follows; and
WHEREAS, the Pr
oject has been completed with the available budget, within the time frame of the original contract plus the time extension given to the contractor for extra work, including rain delays, per plans, specifications, and City of Tracy Standards; and WHEREAS, the Pav
ement Rehabilitation, FY 2019-2020 Project, CIP 73176, is an approved project with total funding Project cost of $1,582,350. The total project budget is $2,175,000, which allowed for the project to come in right on budget. The total project budget funding is from the Measure K, Gas Tax, and SB1 RMA and funds Measure K and Gas Tax will be reimbursed when the project is closed by the Finance Department; now therefore, be it $1,338,158
$ 120,274
A. Construction Contract Amount
B. Approved Change order
C. Design, construction management, inspection, Testing & miscellaneous project management expenses $ 123,918
Total Project Costs $1,582,350
Total Budget Amount $2,175,000
Budget Remaining $ 592,650
Resolution 2023-____

RESOLVED: That the City Council (1) accept the construction for the Pavement Rehabilitation Project, FY 2019-2020, in Tracy, California, CIP 73176, work completed by Tracy Grading and Paving, Inc., of Tracy, California, (2) authorize the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion, (3) authorize the Interim City Engineer to release the bonds and retention payment, and (4) authorize the Finance Department to close the Project. * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
The foregoing Resolution 2023-_____ was adopted by the Tracy City Council on the 21st day of
February 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTION:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:
______________________________
NANCY D. YOUNG
Mayor
of the City of Tracy, California
ATTEST: ________________________

ADRIANNE RICHARDSON
City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of
the City
of Tracy, California
February 21 , 2023
Agenda Item 1.E

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan and setting a Vision Zero goal for 2050.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City of Tracy has completed a Loca l Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP), which establishes a framework to identify, analyze, and develop traffic safety enhancements on the City’s transportation system. The LRSP was developed with a combination of data analysis, and local stakeholder feedback to create a plan that meets federal and state guidelines and responds to local issues and needs. Vision Zero is an international road safety movement rooted in the philosophy that no loss of life due to road crashes is acceptable or inevitable. This agenda item with City Council approval will adopt the City’s Local Roadway Safety Pl an and set a Vision Zero goal for the City for the year 2050.

BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
Caltrans announced that starting April 2022, applications for Highway Safety Improvement Project Program (HSIP) Cycle 11 funds will require agencies that are eligible to apply to have a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). The City received $72,000 State funds for developing the LRSP in March 2020. The City entered into an agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. for the development of the LRSP through Resolution No. 2021-097 under the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 72119. The development of the LRSP will better position the City to apply
for all safety funding from state and federal grant programs. A special concurrent meeting of the Tracy City Council and the Tracy Transportation Advisory Commission was held on February
7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. in the City of Tracy’s Council Chambers to present the LRSP and receive feedback from the community.

Vision Zero is a global movement to end traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries by taking a systemic approach to road safety. The premise of this strategy is tha t road deaths and injuries are unacceptable and preventable. First implemented in Sweden in the 1990s, Vision Zero has proved successful across Europe — and now it’s gaining momentum in major American cities like New York, San Francisco, and San Jose. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) also adopted a policy on February 15, 2022, that commits to setting a vision to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries on California’s roadways by 2050 and provide safer outcomes for all communities.

ANALYSIS
The City of Tracy’s LRSP has now been com pleted. The LRSP evaluates the transportation net
work as well as non-infrastructure programs and policies and identifies the vision to reduce the frequency of traffic fatalities and serious injury related crashes and outlines t he goals to achieve it. It was developed in accordance with the latest National and State best practices for statistical roadway analysis. As part of the LRSP, local stakeholders were included in the process to ensure the local perspective was kept at the forefront of this planning effort. I n addition to the Project Team which included Engineering Staff, a stakeholder group was Agenda Item 1.E
February 21, 2023

organized. This group consisted of members from the Tracy Police Department, Tracy Unified School District, City of Tracy ADA Compliance Office, the South San Joaquin County Fire Authority, San Joaquin County Public Health Services, and the City of Tracy Transit Service Division. These leaders in the City and community were called together to offer insight on the safety issues present in the City's transportation network.

Existing plans, policies, and projects that were recently completed, planned, or are on-going within the City of Tracy were compiled, high-level key points regarding transportation improvements and safety-related topics were identified, and several data inputs were used in analysis, namely the roadway network, intersection classification, traffic counts and collision data for
the period between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. With this data the collision safety trends were analyzed. The analysis of collision history on the City’s transportation network
allowed for opportunities to: 1) identify factors in the transportation network
that inhibit safety for all roadway users, 2) improve safety at specific high-collision locations, and 3) develop safety measures using the 5E’s of transportation safety: Engineering, Enforcement,
Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies, to encourage safe driver behavior, reduce the frequency and severity of crashes, and to institutionalize a process for monitoring safety and making safety investment decisions. A special concurrent meeting of the Tracy City Council and the Tracy Transportation Advisory Commission was held on February 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. in the City of Tracy’s Council Chambers to present the LSRP and receive feedback from the community.

Vision Zero is an international road safety movement rooted in the philosophy that no loss of life due to road crashes is acceptable or inevitable. A core principle of Vision Zero is that people should not
be killed or severely injured due to mobility. Crashes are not accidents; that is, they are entirely preventable if the transportation system is designed to minimize the consequences of human errors and mistakes. As stated in the LRSP, during the 5-year study period, the City has s
een 3,442 collisions, of which 9 were fatal collisions, 81 pedestrian involved collisions, and 102 bicycles collisions. Vision Zero sets the goal of reducing traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries to zero. While zero crashes may sound unrealistic, the objective is to set this as a goal rather
than an expectation.

Vision Zero is gaining momentum across the United States. Currently there are 53 cities in the US that are officially members of the Vision Zero Network with completed Vision Zero plans, 13 of which are in California. Vision Zero Network is a non-profit that is the nation’s leading voice and advocate for Vision Zero. Many other cities in the US have developed Vision Zero plans or adopted resolutions to support Vision Zero goal but haven’t yet joined the Network. It is recommended that in alignment with this global movement, and in solidarity with the adopted Caltrans policy
, City set a goal for attaining Vision Zero in the year 2050.

FISCAL
IMPACT
The Development of the LRSP makes the City better positioned to apply for a variety of state and federal
grant opportunities for traffic safety projects.

Agenda Item 1.E
February 21, 2023

PUBLIC OUTREACH / INTEREST
A special concurrent meeting of the Tracy City Council and the Tracy Transportation Advisory Commission was held on February 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. in the City of Tracy’s Council Chambers to present the LSRP and receive feedback from the community.

COORDINATION
The City’s Engineering Division coordinated with several stakeholders like Tr acy Police Department, Tracy Unified School District, City of Tracy ADA Compliance Office, the South San Joaquin County Fire Authority, San Joaquin County Public Health Services, and the City of Tracy Transit Service Division to seek input for the development of the LRSP. The team also coordinated feedback with the Tracy Transportation Advisory Commission via a special meeting.

CEQA DETERMINATION
This action of approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan and setting a Vision Zero goal will not pose any environmental impact and is not subject to CEQA.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This agenda item supports the City of Tracy’s Quality of Life Strategic Priority, which is to provide an outstanding quality of life by enhancing the City’s amenities, business mix and services and cultivating connections to promote positive change and progress in our community.

ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Local Roadway Safety P
lan and setting a Vision Zero goal for 2050.

Prepared by: Anju Pillai, PE, Senior Engineer
Reviewed by: Koosun Kim, PE, Interim City Engineer
Jayl
en French, Development Services Director
Sara Cowell, Finance Director
Midori Lichtwardt, Assistant City Manager
Approved by: Mi
chael Rogers, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment
A – City of Tracy Local Roadway Safety Plan Final Report City of Tracy
Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)
January 2023
FINAL
Prepared By:

ATTACHMENT A
TRACY LRSP 2023

2 2
2 STATUTORY NOTICE
(Per Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code [23 U.S.C. §148(h) (4)] REPORTS

DISCOVERY AND ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN REPORTS, SURVEYS,AND INFORMATION—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section, shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.)

SIGNED AND STAMPED BY:

_____________________________

TRACY LRSP 2023

3 2
3 1.1 Executive Summary
Tracy has created a local roadway safety plan (LRSP), which establishes a framework to identify, analyze, and develop traffic safety enhancements on the City’s transportation system.

The LRSP was developed with a combination of data analysis, and local stakeholder feedback to create a plan that meets federal and state guidelines and responds to local issues and needs.

Through this process, the plan has identified emphasis areas to inform and refine the safety improvement process and to focus future evaluation and planning for the City’s transportation network. The emphasis areas include impaired driving, lane departure collisions, young drivers, and vulnerable road users (pedestrians and bicyclists). The LRSP also analyzes collision data on an aggregate basis as well as at specific locations to identify high-crash locations, high-risk locations, and city-wide trends and patters. The analysis of collision history on the City’s transportation network allows for opportunities to: 1) identify factors in the transportation network that inhibit safety for all roadway users, 2) improve safety at specific high-collision locations, and 3) develop safety measures using the 5E’s of transportation safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies, to encourage safer driver behavior, reduce the frequency and severity of crashes, and to institutionalize a process for monitoring safety and making safety investment decisions.

The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has ranked Tracy in the 57th percentile for safety as compared to peer cities. The City continues its safety efforts in this LRSP by identifying areas of emphasis and systemic opportunities that can be implemented to enhance safety. This LRSP analyzes the most recent range of crash data (January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2019) and roadway improvements to assess historic trends, patterns, and areas of increasing concern.

As part of the LRSP development process, the City identified a vision and outlined goals to achieve it. The vision is to enhance the transportation network to reduce the frequency of traffic fatalities and serious injury related crashes. The goals were identified as:
• Identify areas with a high risk for collisions.
• Illustrate the value of a comprehensive safety program and the systemic process. • Define safety improvements for the near -, mid- and long-term, including projects for HSIP and other program funding consideration
• Identify emphasis areas to prioritize countermeasure application.

Tracy’s collision history was analyzed to identify locations with elevated risk of collisions either through their collision histories or their similarities to other locations that have more active collision patterns. Using a network screening process, locations within the City that will most likely benefit from safety enhancements were identified. Using historic collision data, collision risk factors for the entire network were derived. The outcomes informed the identification and prioritization of engineering and non-infrastructure safety measures that address certain roadway characteristics and related behaviors that contribute to collisions . The figure below shows the results of collision analysis, including the number of crashes that occurred at each intersection and along each roadway segment in the City.

TRACY LRSP 2023

4 2
4 Number of Collisions per Intersection and Roadway Segment

TRACY LRSP 2023

5 2
5 Emphasis areas were developed by revisiting the vision and goals developed at the onset of the planning process and comparing them with the trends and patterns identified in the crash analysis. Where these areas aligned, or major challenges were observed, the following emphasis areas were developed:

1. Impaired Driving

2. Lane Departure Collisions

3. Young Drivers

4. Vulnerable Road Users (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)
The LRSP identified countermeasures for both infrastructure and non- infrastructure improvements. The report then applies Crash Modification Factor’s (CMFs) where available, which are used to estimate the safety effects of safety improvements to compare and prioritize the improvements. An order of magnitude planning level cost estimate is also provided for each countermeasure, providing a cost/benefit estimate that the City can use to prioritize improvements.

Site-specific opportunities for improvement were identified for the following 8 case study locations. The case study locations were chosen to be representative of a variety of corridor and intersection designs throughout the City.

1. Unsignalized Intersection: F Street & 11th Street

2. Unsignalized Intersection: Parker Avenue & Eaton Avenue

3. Roadway Segment: Holly Drive from Larch Road to Sloan Court

4. Roadway Segment: Pavilion Parkway from Robertson Drive to Auto Plaza Way

5. Signalized Intersection: Naglee Road & Grant Line Road

6. Roadway Segment: Grant Line Road from Lammers Road to Byron Road

7. Roadway Segment: Byron Road from Berg Road to Belconte Drive

8. Signalized Intersection: Lowell Avenue & Corral Hollow Road

9. Roadway Segment: Lammers Road from 11th Street to Redbridge Road

10. Roadway Segment: Tracy Boulevard from Schulte Road to Menay Drive Citywide opportunities that can be implemented systemically throughout the City have also been assembled into the “countermeasure toolbox” shown below, and include both engineering-based and non-engineering countermeasures. This information can be used to help the City apply for grants and other funding opportunities to implement these safety improvements.

City-wide Countermeasure Toolbox (Engineering Opportunities)

COUNTERMEASURE CMF/LRSM
ID CRF 20-YEAR COST

ESTIMATE PER UNIT
Install High-Visibility Crosswalk
4124 19% $25,000 per
crosswalk
Install signals
NS03 25% $270,000 per
intersection
TRACY LRSP 2023

6 2
6 COUNTERMEASURE CMF/LRSM
ID CRF 20-YEAR COST

ESTIMATE PER UNIT
Install/upgrade larger or additional
stop signs/other intersections
warning/regulatory signs (stop signs
with LED borders)
NS06 15% $1,500 per sign
Install raised medians (refuge islands)
NS19PB 45% $25,000 per
intersection
Add segment lighting R01 35% $50,000 per mile
Remove or relocate fixed objects
outside of Clear Recovery Zone
R02 35% $10,000 per location
Install Median Barrier R03 25% $20,000 per location
Install Safety Edges R15 30% $100,000 per mile
Install dynamic/variable speed warning
systems
R26 30% $16,000 per sign
install delineators, reflectors, and or
object markers
R27 15% $5 per LF
Install edge-lines and centerlines R28 25% $8,000 per mile Install bike lane (class III/sharrows)
R32PB 35% $25 per linear
foot
Install separated bike lanes (Class IV) R33PB 45% $250,000 per mile Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Beacon (RRFB)
R37PB 35% $50,000 per
intersection
Install retroreflective backplates
S02 15% $12,000 per
intersection
Improve signal timing (coordination,
phasing, red, yellow, operation)
S03 15% $8,000 per
intersection
Install advanced dilemma zone
detection
S04 40% $34,000 per
intersection
Provide protected left-turn phase
S07 30% $40,000 per
intersection
Install raised pavement markers and
striping (Through Intersection)
S09 10% $22,000 per
intersection
Pedestrian Scramble
S19PB 40% $120,000 per
intersection
Modify signal phasing to implement a
Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
S21PB 60% $8,000 per
intersection

Non-Engineering Safety Strategy Countermeasures:

The identified non-engineering countermeasures below were derived from the collision analysis and build on existing efforts. These relate to the additional Es of Traffic Safety outside of Engineering. This includes Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services and Emerging Technologies.

TRACY LRSP 2023

7 2
7 City-wide Countermeasure Toolbox (Non-Engineering Opportunities)

PROPOSED COUNTERMEASURE POTENTIAL PARTNERS EXAMPLES OF

COUNTERMEASURE

ENFORCEMENT
Establish enforcement and visibility
program for aggressive driving Local law enforcement; CHP CHP’s Regulate Aggressive
Driving and Reduce Speed
(RADARS) Program
Continued enforcement in school
zones
Local law enforcement; CHP;
school districts
Obtain grant funding for
additional personnel in school
zones
Increased enforcement of safe
driving & active transportation
behaviors near busy crosswalk
locations
Local law enforcement; CHP
Obtain grant funding for
additional enforcement near
high pedestrian activity
locations

EDUCATION
Campaign to target aggressive
driving and DUIs
Local law enforcement; CHP;
California Office of Traffic Safety
(OTS)
CHP’s Regulate Aggressive
Driving and Reduce Speed
(RADARS) Program
Bicycle and pedestrian safety
campaign Local law enforcement
SCAG’s ‘Go Human’
Campaign; ‘ OTS’ ‘Ride With
Traffic’ campaign
Explore safe routes to school
education grants to expand
program
Local school districts; local law
enforcement; SCAG
Safe Routes to School
Program, funded by Caltrans
Coordinate safety education
campaigns SJCOG; local law enforcement
Roadway safety fairs at
schools
Education campaign for aging
drivers

EMERGENCY SERVICES
Continue to work on
interdepartmental communication
between City staff and City police
department and fire department
Local law enforcement & fire
department
Incorporate law
enforcement/fire department
as stakeholders on
transportation improvement
projects
Incorporate public health agencies
and fire departments as
stakeholders in safety projects
Local public health agencies and
fire departments
Adjust safety project
development processes to
include public health and fire
department feedback

EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
Continue to use best practices for
pedestrian crossings at high
pedestrian traffic areas
City Public Works; Caltrans
Continuously update
pedestrian crossing design
standards in accordance with
latest best practices
Utilize new data sources to monitor
traffic conditions and inform County
safety plans
City Public Works; Caltrans Utilization of data from a
traffic management center

An evaluation and implementation plan were created that identifies actionable items that will help the City achieve the goals and vision set out in this report. This section laid out next steps for the City to continue to capitalize on the analysis and information provided in this report.

TRACY LRSP 2023

8 2
8 Table of Contents

1.1 Executive Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 3 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 11 3 VISION AND GOALS.................................................................................... 12 4 PROCESS ..................................................................................................... 14

4.1 Guiding Manuals ................................ ................................ ................................ .........14

4.2 Analysis Techniques ................................ ................................ ................................ ...16 5 SAFETY PARTNERS ................................................................................... 18

5.1 Stakeholder Meeting #1 ................................ ................................ .............................. 19

5.2 Field Tour and Stakeholder Meeting #2 ................................ ................................ ......19 6 EXISTING EFFORTS .................................................................................... 20 7 DATA SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 22

7.1 Roadway Network ................................ ................................ ................................ .......22

7.2 Intersections ................................ ................................ ................................ ...............22

7.3 Count Data ................................ ................................ ................................ .................22

7.4 Collision Data ................................ ................................ ................................ ..............22 8 COLLISION SAFETY TRENDS .................................................................... 27

8.1 All Collisions ................................ ................................ ................................ ...............27

8.2 Fatalities & Severe injuries ................................ ................................ ..........................28

8.3 Injury Levels................................ ................................ ................................ ................29

8.4 Cause of Collision ................................ ................................ ................................ .......30

8.5 Vulnerable Users ................................ ................................ ................................ ........30

8.6 Other Significant Trends ................................ ................................ .............................33

8.7 Behavioral ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................34

8.8 Statewide Comparison ................................ ................................ ................................ 34

8.9 Network Screening Analysis Results ................................ ................................ ...........35 9 EMPHASIS AREAS ...................................................................................... 53

9.1 Emphasis Area #1: Impaired Driving ................................ ................................ ...........53

9.2 Emphasis Area #2: Lane Departure (Head-On, Hit Object, Overturned) .....................53

9.3 Emphasis Area #3: Young Drivers ................................ ................................ ..............54

9.4 Emphasis Area #4: Vulnerable Road Users (Pedestrians and Bicyclists) ....................55 10 OPPORTUNITIES ......................................................................................... 55

10.1 Infrastructure Improvements ................................ ................................ .......................55

10.2 Non-Infrastructure Improvements ................................ ................................ ................57 TRACY LRSP 2023

9 2
9 10.3 City-wide Countermeasure Toolbox ................................ ................................ ............59 11 EVALUATION & IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................... 63

11.1 Evaluation ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................63

11.2 Implementation ................................ ................................ ................................ ...........63

11.3 Funding ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................64

11.4 Next Steps ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................66 APPENDIX A – CASE STUDY SHEETS ............................................................ 67

TRACY LRSP 2023

10 2
10 Table of Figures
Figure 1: Critical Crash Rate Formula ................................ ................................ .......................17 Figure 2: Probability of Specific Crash Types Exceeding Threshold Proportion.........................18 Figure 3: Functional Classification (CRS) and Intersection Type as of 2020 .............................23 Figure 4: All Collisions resulting in Severe Injury or Fatality (2015-2019) ................................ ..24 Figure 5: Fatalities Locations for Pedestrians and Bicycle Collisions (2015-2019) ....................25 Figure 6: Density of all Collisions at Intersections and Segments (2015-2019) .........................26 Figure 7: Collision Type by Year ................................ ................................ ............................... 27 Figure 8: Collisions by Injury Levels (2015- 2019) ................................ ................................ .....29 Figure 9: Collisions by Cause (2015-2019) ................................ ................................ ...............30 Figure 10: Pedestrian and Bicycle Collisions (2015-2019) ................................ ........................32 Figure 11: Dark Lighting Collisions (2015-2019) ................................ ................................ ........33

Table of Tables
Table 1: Existing Documents Reviewed ................................ ................................ ....................20 Table 2: Fatal & Severe Injury Collisions by Mode (2015-2019) ................................ ................28 Table 3: Fatal & Severe Injury Collisions by Cause (2015-2019) ................................ ...............29 Table 4: Comparison of Statewide and Tracy Fatal & Severe Injury Collisions (2016-2018) .....34 Table 5: Analysis Rankings – Intersections (Top Locations Per Intersection Type) ...................37 Table 6: Analysis Rankings – Segments (Top Locations Per Segment Type) ...........................50 Table 7: Summary of Program, Policies, and Practices ................................ .............................57 Table 8: City-wide Countermeasure Toolbox ................................ ................................ ............61 Table 9: Non-Engineering Safety Strategy Countermeasures ................................ ...................62

TRACY LRSP 2023

11 2
11 2 Introduction
Tracy is a vibrant community in southern San Joaquin County, known for its rich history and proximity to the San Francisco Bay area. Tracy has a population of around 93,000 residents, and a median age of 34 years. With an economy based on retail, light manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare, the City has varied transportation needs.

This Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) identifies emphasis areas to inform and guide further safety evaluation of the City’s transportation network. he emphasis areas include impaired driving, lane departure collisions, young drivers, and vulnerable road users (pedestrians and bicyclists) . The LRSP also analyzes collision data on an aggregate basis as well as at specific locations to identify high-crash locations, high-risk locations, and city-wide trends and patters.

The analysis of collision history on the City’s transportation network allows for opportunities to:
1) identify factors in the transportation network that inhibit safety for all roadway users, 2) improve safety at specific high-collision locations, and 3) develop safety measures using the 5E’s of transportation safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies, to encourage safer driver behavior, reduce the frequency and severity of crashes, and to institutionalize a process for monitoring safety and making safety investment decisions.

The process and analysis performed for the City’s LRSP including initial vision and goals for the LRSP development, crash history analysis, and emphasis areas is included in this Plan. The information compiled will provide a foundation for decision making and prioritization for safety countermeasures and projects that enhance safety for all modes.

The California Office of Traffic Safety ranked Tracy against 105 peer cities. Compared to these peer cities, Tracy ranks as a relatively safe community and shows the efforts the City has taken to create a safe network have been successful. According to the California OTS’ 2019 rankings (most recent available), Tracy was ranked 60/105 for traffic injuries and fatalities. Tracy received its lowest ranking in the category: Had Been Drinking with Driver under 21 (10/105). Other areas of concern are for collisions involving motorcyclists and bicyclists. The City ranks well for pedestrian collisions, being ranked 86/105. The City is continuing these safety efforts through this plan by identifying areas of emphasis and opportunities for system improvement that can be implemented to enhance safety. This LRSP analyzes the most recent 5-year period of available crash data (January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2019) and roadway improvements to assess historic trends, patterns, and areas of elevated collision activity.

The intent of the LRSP is to:
• Create a greater awareness of road safety and risks
• Reduce the number of fatal and severe-injury crashes
• Develop lasting partnerships
• Support for grant/funding applications, and
• Help prioritize investments in traffic safety.

TRACY LRSP 2023

12 2
12 3 Vision and Goals
The Tracy LRSP evaluates the transportation network as well as non-infrastructure programs and policies within the City. Mitigation measures are evaluated using criteria to analyze the safety of road users (drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians), the interaction of modes, influences on the roadway network from adjacent municipalities, and the potential benefits of safety countermeasures. This effort is intended to use historical data to identify trends and develop a toolbox of countermeasures applicable to conditions in the City that can be used for proactive identification and implementation of opportunities, without relying solely on a reaction and response to crashes as they occur.

LRSPs have been effective across the country as part of the effort to reduce fatal and severe- injury crashes because they provide a locally developed and customized roadmap to directly address the most common safety challenges in the given jurisdiction. Consistent with these findings, the following Vision, Goals, and Objectives have been established for this project.

VISION: To enhance the transportation network for all users to reduce the frequency of traffic fatalities and serious injuries.

3.1 Goal #1: Identify areas with a high risk for collision.

Objectives:
a. Evaluate the City’s roadway network for crash activity. b. Identify intersections and segments in need of mitigation. c. Identify areas of interest with respect to safety concerns for pedestrians and bicycles.

3.2 Goal #2: Illustrate the value of a comprehensive safety program and the systemic process.

Objectives:
a. Demonstrate the systemic process’ ability to identify locations with higher risk for collisions based on present characteristics closely associated with severe collisions. b. Demonstrate, through the systemic process, the gaps and data collection activities that can be improved upon.

3.3 Goal #3: Define safety improvements for the near-, mid- and long-term, including projects for HSIP and other
program funding consideration
Objectives:
a. Create the outline for a prioritization process that can be used in forth -coming funding cycles. b. Use the systemic process to create Project Case Study sheets. c. Use Project Case Study sheets to apply for upcoming HSIP funding consideration. d. Demonstrate the correlation between the proposed safety countermeasures with the Vision Zero Initiative and the California State Highway Safety Plan.

TRACY LRSP 2023

13 2
13 3.4 Goal #4: Identify emphasis areas to prioritize
countermeasure application
Objectives:
a. Use systemic collision analysis to identify emphasis areas. b. Prioritize emphasis areas for countermeasure development. c. Align emphasis areas with current City areas of concern: speeding, distracted driving, DUI, bicycle and pedestrian collisions.

TRACY LRSP 2023

14 2
14 4 Process
The following section describes the analysis process undertaken to evaluate safety within Tracy at a systemic level. Using a network screening process, locations within the City that will most likely benefit from safety enhancements will be identified. Using historic collision data, collision risk factors for the entire network are derived. The outcomes will inform the identification and prioritization of engineering and non-infrastructure safety measures that address certain roadway characteristics and related behaviors that contribute to motor vehicle collisions with active transportation users.

The following section describes the analysis process undertaken to evaluate safety within Tracy at a systemic level. Using a network screening process, locations within the City that will most likely benefit from safety enhancements will be identified. Using historic collision data, collision risk factors for the entire network are derived. The outcomes will inform the identification and prioritization of engineering and non-infrastructure safety measures that address certain roadway characteristics and related behaviors that contribute to motor vehicle collisions with active transportation users.

4.1 Guiding Manuals
The following section describes the analysis process undertaken to evaluate safety within Tracy at a systemic level. Using a network screening process, locations within the City that will most likely benefit from safety enhancements will be identified. Using historic collision data, collision risk factors for the entire network are derived. The outcomes will inform the identification and prioritization of engineering and non-infrastructure safety measures that address certain roadway characteristics and related behaviors that contribute to motor vehicle collisions with active transportation users.

This process uses the latest National and State best practices for statistical roadway analysis described as follows.

4.1.1 Local Roads Safety Manual
The Local Roadway Safety Manual: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners (Version 1.5, April 2020) purpose is to encourage local agencies to pursue a proactive approach to identifying and analyzing safety issues, while preparing to compete for project funding opportunities. A proactive approach is defined as analyzing the safety of the entire roadway network through either a one-time, network wide analysis, or by routine analyses of the roadway network.1 According to the Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM), “The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) – Division of Local Assistance is responsible for administering California’s federal safety funding intended for local safety improvements.” To provide the most benefit and to be competitive for funding, the analysis leading to countermeasure selection should focus on both intersections and roadway segments and be considerate of roadway characteristics and traffic volumes. The result should be a list of locations that are most likely to benefit from cost-effective countermeasures, preferably prioritized by benefit/cost ratio. The manual suggests using a mixture of quantitative and

1 Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.5) 2020. Page 5.

TRACY LRSP 2023

15 2
15 qualitative measures to identify and rank locations that considers both crash frequency and crash rates. These findings should then be screened for patterns such as crash types and severity to aid in the determination of issues causing higher numbers of crashes and the potential countermeasures that could be most effective. Qualitative analysis should include field visits and a review of existing roadway characteristics and devices. The specific roadway context can then be used to assess what conditions may increase safety risk at the site and systematic level.

Countermeasure selection should be supported using Crash Modification Factors (CMFs).

These factors are the peer reviewed product of before and after research that quantifies the expected rate of collision reduction that can be expected from a given countermeasure. If more than one countermeasure is under consideration, the LRSM provides guidance on how to apply CMFs appropriately.

4.1.2 Highway Safety Manual
“The AASHTO Highway Safety Manual (HSM), published in 2010, presents a variety of methods for quantitatively estimating crash frequency or severity at a variety of locations.”2 This four-part manual is divided into Parts: A) Introduction, Human Factors, and Fundamentals, B) Roadway Safety Management Process, C) Predictive Method, D) Crash Modification Factors.

Chapter 4 of Part B of the HSM discusses the Network Screening process. The Network Screening Process is a tool for an agency to analyze their entire network and identify/rank locations that (based on the implementation of a countermeasure) are most likely to least likely to realize a reduction in the frequency of collisions.

The HSM identifies five steps in this process:3

1. Establish Focus: Identify the purpose or intended outcome of the network screening analysis. This decision will influence data needs, the selection of performance measures and the screening method that can be applied.

2. Identify Network and Establish Reference Populations: Specify the types of sites or facilities being screened (i.e., segments, intersections, geometrics) and identify groupings of similar sites or facilities.

3. Select Performance Measures: There are a variety of performance measures available to evaluate the potential to reduce crash frequency at a site. In this step, the performance measure is selected as a function of the screening focus and the data and analytical tools available.

4. Select Screening Method: There are three principle screening methods described in this chapter (i.e., ranking, sliding window, peak searching). Each method has advantages and disadvantages; the most appropriate method for a given situation should be selected.

5. Screen and Evaluate Results: The final step in the process is to conduct the screening and analysis and evaluate the results.

2 AASHTO, Highway Safety Manual, 2010, Washington D.C., http://www.highwaysafetymanual.org/Pages/About.aspx
3 AASHTO. Highway Safety Manual. 2010. Washington, DC. Page 4-2.

TRACY LRSP 2023

16 2
16 The HSM provides several statistical methods for screening roadway networks to identify high risk locations based on overall collision histories. In addition to identifying the total number of collisions, this study uses a method referred to as Critical Crash Rate to analyze the data.

4.2 Analysis Techniques

4.2.1 Collision and Network Screening Analysis
Intersections and roadways were analyzed using four collision metrics:
• Number of Collisions
• Critical Crash Rate (HSM Ch. 4)
• Probability of Specific Crash Types Exceeding Threshold Proportion (HSM Ch. 4) • Equivalent Property Damage Only (HSM Ch. 4)
The initial steps of the collision analysis established sub-populations of roadway segments and intersections that have similar characteristics. For this study, intersections were grouped by their control type (Signalized and Unsignalized) and segments by their roadway category (Arterial, Collector, Minor Collector, Local). Individual collision rates were calculated for each sub- population. The population level crash rates were then used to assess whether a specific location has more or fewer crashes than expected. These sub-populations were also used to determine typical crash patterns to help identify locations where unusual numbers of specific crash types are seen.

The network screening process ranks intersections and roadway segments by the number of crashes that occurred at each one over the analysis period, and then identifies areas that had more of a given type of crash than would be expected for that type of location. These crash type factors were 1) collision injury (fatal, serious injury, other visible injury, complaint of pain, property damage only), 2) collision type (broadside, rear-end, sideswipe, head-on, hit object, overturned, bicycle, pedestrian, other), 3) environmental factors (lighting, wet roads), and 4) driver behavior (impaired, aggressive, and distracted driving). With these additional factors, the locations were further analyzed and assigned a new rank.

From the results of the network screening analyses, a short-list of locations was chosen based on crash activity, crash severity, crash patterns, location type, and area of the City of Tracy to provide the greatest variety of locations covering the widest range of safety opportunities for toolbox development. The intent is to populate the safety toolbox with mitigation measures that will be applicable to most of the crash activity in the county. Ten locations will ultimately be selected for mitigation analysis.

4.2.2 Critical Crash Rate (CCR) Analysis
Reviewing the number of collisions at a location is a good way to understand the cost to society incurred at the local level but does not give a complete indication of the level of risk for those who use that intersection or roadway segment on a daily basis. The Highway Safety Manual describes the Critical Crash Rate method, which provides a statistical review of locations to determine where risk is higher than that experienced by other similar locations. It is also the first step in analyzing for patterns that may suggest systemic issues that can be addressed at that location, and proactively at others to prevent new safety challenges from emerging.

TRACY LRSP 2023

17 2
17 The Critical Crash Rate compares the observed crash rate to the expected crash rate at a particular location based on facility type and volume using a locally calculated average crash rate for the specific type of intersection or roadway segment being analyzed. Based on traffic volumes and a weighted citywide crash rate for each facility type, a critical crash rate threshold is established at the 95% confidence level to determine locations with higher crash rates that are unlikely to be random. The threshold is calculated for each location individually based on its traffic volume and the crash profile of similar facilities.

Figure 1: Critical Crash Rate Formula

Source: Highway Safety Manual
Data Needs
CCR can be calculated using:
• Daily entering volume for intersections, or vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for roadway segments,
• Intersection control types to separate them into like populations, • Roadway functional classification to separate them into like populations, • Collision records in GIS or tabular form including coordinates or linear measures.

Strengths
• Reduces low volume exaggeration
• Considers variance
• Establishes comparison threshold

4.2.3 Probability Analysis
The Highway Safety Manual describes the methodology for determining the probability that crash type is greater than an identified threshold proportion. This helps to identify locations where a crash type is more likely to occur.

Data Needs
The probability of a specific crash type can be determined using collisions records with location data, and classifications of the locations (intersections or segments) studied.

TRACY LRSP 2023

18 2
18 Strengths
• Can be used as a diagnostic tool
• Considers variance in data
• Not affected by selection bias
The HSM methodology first determines the frequency of a specific collision type at an individual location, then determines the observed proportion of that collision type relative to all collision types at that location. A threshold proportion is then determined for the specific collision type; HSM suggests utilizing the proportion of the collision type observed in the entire reference population (e.g. throughout the entire City of Tracy).

These proportions are then utilized to determine the probability that the proportion of a specific crash type is greater than the long-term expected proportion of that crash type.

Figure 2: Probability of Specific Crash Types Exceeding Threshold Proportion

Source: Highway Safety Manual

4.2.4 Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO)
The equivalent property damage only (EPDO) method is described in the Highway Safety Manual. This method assigns weighting factors to crashes based on injury level (severe, injury, property damage only) to develop a property damage only score. In this analysis, the injury crash costs were calculated for each location (based on the latest Caltrans injury costs). This figure is then divided by the injury cost for a property damage only crash. The resulting number is the equivalent number of property damage only crashes at each site. This figure allows all locations to be compared based on injury crash costs. (Highway Safety Manual, Chapter 4). 5 Safety Partners
As part of the LRSP, local stakeholders were included in the process to ensure the local perspective was kept at the forefront of this planning effort. In addition to the Project Team which included City Staff, a stakeholder group was organized. This group consisted of members from the Tracy Police Department, Tracy Unified School District, City of Tracy ADA Compliance

TRACY LRSP 2023

19 2
19 Office, the San Joaquin County Fire Department, San Joaquin County Public Health Services, and the City of Tracy Transit Service Division.

These leaders in the City and community were called together to offer insight on the safety issues present in the city’s transportation network. After the initial network screening and safety analysis, the stakeholder group met to discuss potential countermeasures and challenge areas.

The summary of the stakeholder meeting(s) are outlined below.

5.1 Stakeholder Meeting #1
The first stakeholder meeting was conducted virtually using the Microsoft Teams platform on November 15th, 2021. At the meeting, stakeholders were introduced to the project and provided an overview of the data used, the required outputs, and the potential outcomes of the study.

In addition to the overview, Stakeholders were asked to provide local insight and knowledge at 10 ‘case study’ locations that were identified after the initial network screening and crash analysis process.

Stakeholder feedback regarding the plan and opportunities were reviewed and incorporated into the study process for the development of the LRSP.

5.2 Field Tour and Stakeholder Meeting #2
On December 7th, 2021, the Project Team performed a field tour of the 10 ‘case study’ locations to observe traffic, look for roadway features that can be related to collision activity and to get input from stakeholders on things they have seen, heard of, or experienced at these locations.

Following the field tour, a virtual meeting was held on December 14th to review the findings and brainstorm potential projects that could improve safety at the case study locations. This information was processed and incorporated into the LRSP.

TRACY LRSP 2023

20 2
20 6 Existing Efforts
Existing plans, policies, and projects that were recently completed, planned, or are on-going within the City of Tracy were compiled at the start of the LRSP process in order to gain perspective on the existing efforts for transportation-related improvements within the City. High- level key points regarding transportation improvements and safety-related topics were identified to inform decision making in this LRSP. Information reviewed included the following:

Table 1: Existing Documents Reviewed
Name Year Agency Description Transportation
Policies/Improvements Funding Sources
General Plan
(Circulation
Element)
2011 City of
Tracy
Long-Term
Planning
• Future circulation
element plan
• Congestion
Management Plan
(CMP)
• Transportation
Master Plan (TMP)
• New interchanges
with I-205
• Raise LOS at select
intersections and
roadways
• Continued build-out
of bike/ped
infrastructure and
mode separation.
• Measure K (San
Joaquin County ½
Penny Sales Tax)
• San Joaquin
County
• State of California
• San Joaquin
Council of
Governments
City of Tracy
Bikeways Master
Plan
2005 City of
Tracy
Non-Motorized
Transportation
Plan
• Gap closure of
existing system
• Development of a
class I bike path
• New development to
include bike facilities
• Pursue development
of multi-use trails
plan
• Develop a city-wide
class I trail loop
• Promote bike safety
and education
• Developer Impact
Fees
• Caltrans
• U.S. DOT
• California
Transportation
Commission
• San Joaquin
Council of
Governments
TRACY LRSP 2023

21 2
21 Name Year Agency Description Transportation
Policies/Improvements Funding Sources
Tracy Roadway
& Transportation
Master Plan
2012
(updated
2016)
City of
Tracy
Transportation
Improvement
Plan
• Provide
implementation
plan for the
circulation
element
• Develop Travel
Demand
Management
(TDM) principles
• Implement
complete streets
policy
• Enhance street
connectivity
• Implement grade
separated
crossings at
select railroad
crossings.
• Implement safe
routes to school
program
• Create a bicycle
and pedestrian
safety action
plan
• Capital
improvement
plan
• Tax
increment
financing

TRACY LRSP 2023

22 2
22 7 Data Summary
As a data driven process, utilizing the most recent and accurate data is crucial. The following section describes the data inputs used for the analysis process of this LRSP.

7.1 Roadway Network
The collision analysis is built upon the existing roadway network. The base network was derived from the Caltrans California Road System (CRS) and updated to include more newly developed neighborhoods within the city. Figure 3 illustrates Tracy’s roadway network categorized using Caltrans’ Classification System. This classification assigned to each corridor roadway segment as either Other Principal Arterial, Minor Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, or Local road is used in the analysis process. Ultimately, corridors will be compared to roadway segments with similar designations.

7.2 Intersections
The collision analysis requires each intersection be classified by type: Signalized or Unsignalized. The safety analysis compares intersection safety performance to locations with similar control types. This information is also displayed in Figure 3.

7.3 Count Data
Vehicular count data is used as part of the analysis process to evaluate the impact of traffic and understand the natural hierarchy of the roadway network. The volumes were collected from the 2015 Tracy Travel Demand Model. For locations without volume or count data, other resources were utilized to identify a reasonable assumption for individual corridors and classification types.

7.4 Collision Data
Collision data was collected from Crossroads Software for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019 to have a complete set of collision data for analysis. This project uses five-years of data instead of the standard three to provide more history to evaluate trends or patterns. Analysis of the raw collision data is the first step in understanding the specific and systemic challenges faced throughout the City. Analyzing the five years of data provided insight on the following collision trends and patterns. The locations of fatal and severe injury collisions are displayed in Figure 43. The locations of fatal and severe injury collisions involving bicycles and pedestrians are shown in Figure 5. The density of collisions at intersections and along roadway segments is show in Figure 6.

TRACY LRSP 2023

23 2
23 Figure 3: Functional Classification (CRS) and Intersection Type as of 2020

TRACY LRSP 2023

24 2
24 Figure 4: All Collisions resulting in Severe Injury or Fatality (2015-2019)

TRACY LRSP 2023

25 2
25 Figure 5: Fatalities Locations for Pedestrians and Bicycle Collisions (2015-2019)

TRACY LRSP 2023

26 2
26 Figure 6: Density of all Collisions at Intersections and Segments (2015-2019)

TRACY LRSP 2023

27 2
27 8 Collision Safety Trends
The following section breaks down the collision data by a variety of input factors and user types.

This information will be used to highlight areas of concern for the City.

8.1 All Collisions
This report utilized collision data for a five-year period to provide a better understanding of trends and to reflect the patterns in crashes that have occurred on City streets. New data is added to the system in an ongoing basis which means that each time the City updates the analysis, a full 5-year draw from the database, rather than just adding records from the last query should be standard practice. Data used for this report were extracted from Crossroads Software analytics on July 22nd, 2021 and was current as of that date. Collision data from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019 as reported to Crossroads from the local enforcement indicated that during this time there were 3,442 collisions recorded within Tracy.

During this time, the most common occurring collision types were Rear-End (30%) and Broadside (26%) The total number of collisions per year was similar in 2015, 2016, and 2019, with 725, 778, and 737 crashes respectively. Crashes dropped significantly in 2017, 2018 and 2020, with 618, 584, and 540 crashes respectively.

Figure 7: Collision Type by Year

0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
No. of Collisions
Year
Vehicle-Pedestrian
Sideswipe
Rear-end
Overturned
Other
Not stated
Hit Object
Head-On
Broadside
TRACY LRSP 2023

28 2
28 8.2 Fatalities & Severe injuries
During the study period, 9 fatal and 42 severe injury collisions occurred, as seen in Figure 4.

These collisions were mainly concentrated along the City’s arterial roadways, such as 11th Street, Tracy Boulevard, and Grant Line Road. As shown in Table 2 below, a majority fatal & severe injury collision solely involved vehicles, but a significant number involved pedestrians and bicyclists.

Table 2: Fatal & Severe Injury Collisions by Mode (2015-2019) Involved With # of Fatal Collisions # of Severe Injury Collisions Vehicle 5 27
Bicycle - 6
Pedestrian 4 9

The cause of the fatal & severe injury collisions is shown in Table 3 below. The most common cause for fatal collisions is driving under the influence (33%), while the most
common
cause for
severe injury
collision is auto
right of way
violation
(19%) and
improper
turning
(19%).

Collision Cause # of Fatal
Collisions
# of Severe Injury
Collisions
Auto R/W Violation 1 8
Improper Turning 1 8
Driving Under
Influence
3 7
Pedestrian Violation - 5
Unsafe Speed 1 4
Wrong Side of Road 1 4
Traffic Signals and
Signs
- 2
Ped R/W Violation 1 1
Unknown 1 1
Improper Passing - 1
Unstated - 1
Collision Cause # of Fatal
Collisions
# of Severe Injury
Collisions
Auto R/W Violation 1 8
Improper Turning 1 8
Driving Under
Influence
3 7
Pedestrian Violation - 5
Unsafe Speed 1 4
Wrong Side of Road 1 4
Traffic Signals and
Signs
- 2
Ped R/W Violation 1 1
Unknown 1 1
Improper Passing - 1
TRACY LRSP 2023

29 2
29 Table 3: Fatal
& Severe
Injury Collisions by Cause (2015-2019)

8.3 Injury Levels
Figure 8 shows the distribution of collisions by injury level. Roughly more than half (70%) of the collisions reported during the time-period resulted in property damage only. Fatalities and severe injuries totaled less than 2% of all collisions.

Figure 8: Collisions by Injury Levels (2015- 2019)

71%
21%
7%

1.2%

0.3%
Property Damage Only
Complaint of Pain
Other Visible Injury
Severe Injury
Fatal
Unstated - 1
TRACY LRSP 2023

30 2
30 8.4 Cause of Collision
The highest cause of collision in Tracy is unsafe speed at 25%, followed by improper turning at 24% and by automobile right-of-way violation at 14%. 8% of the collisions were caused by drivers ignoring traffic signals or signs. Figure 9 shows the distribution of collisions by cause.

Figure 9: Collisions by Cause (2015-2019)

8.5 Vulnerable Users

8.5.1 Pedestrians
81 pedestrian-involved collisions occurred during the study period, resulting in 4 fatal collisions, 9 severe injury collisions, and 63 with some form of reported injury or pain. Thirty-five percent (35%) of the collisions occurred at night, and about 2% of these were in areas without 25%
24%
14%
8%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
2%

1.05%

1.02%

0.99%

0.99%

0.76%

0.61%

0.44%

0.09%

0.03%

0.03%

0.03%
Unsafe Speed
Improper Turning
Auto R/W Violation
Traffic Signals and Signs
Driving Under Influence
Unsafe Lane Change
Unknown
Following Too Closely
Unsafe Starting or Backing
Wrong Side of Road
Other Improper Driving
Improper Passing
Other
Ped R/W Violation
Other Than Driver or Ped
Pedestrian Violation
Other Hazardous
Movement
Other Equipment
Hazardous Parking
Impeding Traffic
Lights
TRACY LRSP 2023

31 2
31 streetlights or when they were not functioning (did not turn on or light had burned out). Just about 25% of pedestrian collisions occurred while the pedestrian was crossing in the crosswalk.

8.5.2 Bicycle
During the study period, 102 collisions involving bicycles were reported. Of these, six (6) resulted in severe injuries, twenty-seven (27) resulted in property damage only, and sixty-nine (69) with some form of reported injury or pain. About 23% of collisions occurred at night.

However, 75% of the collisions occurred during the day. Just under half (41%) of the bicycle collisions were caused by a vehicle or bicycle being on the wrong side of the road. Figure 10 shows the location of pedestrian and bicycle collisions in the City.

TRACY LRSP 2023

32 2
32 Figure 10: Pedestrian and Bicycle Collisions (2015-2019)

TRACY LRSP 2023

33 2
33 8.6 Other Significant Trends
• Six percent of collisions (229) occurred at night without streetlights or during dusk/dawn.

Many of these collisions still occurred at or near intersections. Figure 11 shows the location of these collisions.
• 30 percent of collisions (1025) involved rear -end and 26 percent of collisions (890) involved broadside. Although significant in number, there are no discernable city -wide patterns to these collisions.
• Six percent of drivers at fault were aged 65 and older. Looking at the expanded range of aged 55 and older, this group accounts for just over 14% of collisions. • 27 percent of the drivers at fault were between 16 and 25 years old.

Figure 11: Dark Lighting Collisions (2015-2019)

TRACY LRSP 2023

34 2 34

8.7 Behavioral

8.7.1 Driving Under the Influence
292 collisions, just over 8% of all collisions, were reported as the driver being under the influence of drugs or alcohol. 70% of the DUI collisions resulted in property damage only. 33% of the traffic fatalities involved a DUI.

8.7.2 Aggressive Driving
Twenty-nine percent of the collisions were primarily caused by aggressive driving (drivers traveling at unsafe speed or following too closely). These types of collisions are located primarily on major arterials.

8.7.3 Driver Inattention
Less than one percent of collisions had driver inattention as a possible contributing factor. This category is assumed to be underreported as it is difficult to determine that driver inattention led to a crash. Caltrans is prioritizing improved reporting of these types of crashes.

8.8 Statewide Comparison
Due to the availability of data, a comparison of fatal and severe injury data to the State averages could only be conducted for data from 2009-2018. These numbers may vary slightly from those mentioned previously, due to the differences in the years of the study period. The following table compares factors involved in serious injury and fatal crashes between the City of Tracy and totals for the state.

Table 4: Comparison of Statewide and Tracy Fatal & Severe Injury Collisions (2009-2018) Challenge Area Statewide % Tracy % # of
Collisions % Difference
Lane Departure 42.1% 55.1% 435 12.9%
Impaired Driving

23.8% 31.4% 248 7.6%
Commercial Vehicles

6.5% 11.5% 91 5.0%
Improper Use of Occupant
Protection 13.8% 18.0% 142 4.2%
Young Drivers 12.3% 13.7% 108 1.3%
Work Zones 1.4% 2.5% 20 1.1%
Aging Drivers (65+) 13.1% 13.3% 105 0.2%
Distracted Driving 4.7% 2.7% 21 -2.1%
Aggressive Driving

33.3% 30.9% 244 -2.4%
TRACY LRSP 2023

35 2
35 Challenge Area Statewide % Tracy % # of
Collisions % Difference
Bicyclists 7.5% 3.3% 26 -4.2%
Motorcyclists 21.8% 15.6% 123 -6.2%
Intersections 23.9% 8.0% 63 -15.9%
Pedestrians 19.3% 0.6% 5 -18.7%

8.9 Network Screening Analysis Results
Table 5 and Table 6 show the number of crashes occurring at locations in Tracy by crash type for the locations that will be studied further in the Report, and highlights locations in which the probability of those crash types exceeding the threshold proportion is greater than 33%.

The tables are ordered by the number of collisions that occurred at that segment or intersection.

In order to be statistically significant, only locations where more than two collisions occurred are represented. At locations with two or less collisions, random chance can account for crash history as much or more than specific roadway characteristics. The tables include the top 10 locations by number of crashes for each intersection and roadway type.

The tables are separated into sub-sections visible by the blue gradient. The first two columns, Crashes and Local CCR Differential, represent the level of crash activity in absolute terms, and as relative to other similar locations, respectively.

Per guidance from the Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) each sub-population of locations was ranked according to the number of collisions. The second column shows the CCR, which highlights whether or not the collision activity was higher or lower than the average for the sub- population based on the individual segment or intersection volume. This volume was either collected through data count resources or calculated based on the roadway classification. All averages used in the CCR calculation were established based on City of Tracy’s crash data to determine what locations might be best to prioritize at the local level. This process highlights locations of collisions that are unusual for the City to determine Tracy’s challenge areas, and not problems faced by peer cities that do not apply in Tracy. The remaining columns total collisions by type, to evaluate each sub-population and understand what proportion of crashes in the City are of a particular type. The city-wide proportion was compared with the local intersection or segment specific proportion to determine which locations have more of a given crash type than would be expected when considering the City average. A confidence level of 95% was used for the CCR Calculations. For this study, two categories of ranges were highlighted:
• Light Gray: >50% probability that this crash type is over-represented on this segment/intersection as compared to other characteristically similar locations within the City of Tracy. Although these locations have a slightly higher probability of this crash type than their counterparts, they are not necessarily highly significant. • Dark Gray: >75% probability that this crash type is over-represented on this segment/intersection as compared to other characteristically similar locations within the TRACY LRSP 2023

36 2
36 City of Tracy. These locations are highly significant in regard to the number of collisions occurring here and should be further investigated.

After this analysis was completed, the locations were ranked against other similar locations within the City by their categories according to the expected proportion of that crash type within Tracy. Locations with higher than expected crashes of that type were identified by the probability that random chance would not account for exceedances.

Additionally, it should be noted that the columns for Collision Severity, Type, Involved With, and Behavior are additional characteristics of the collisions and should not be counted as a separate collision.

The following provides an example of how to read Table 5 and Table 6.

Table Definitions:
- Total Collisions: Number of collisions observed at the intersection or segment from January of 2015 through December of 2019.
- Local Critical Crash Rate (CCR) Differential: The CCR specific to the intersection or segment.
- Fatal, Severe, Other Visible Injury, Complaint of Pain, Property Damage Only (PDO):

The number of collisions with that injury level that occurred at this location in the study period.
- Broadside, Sideswipe, Rear-End, Head-On, Hit Object, Overturned, Other, Pedestrian, Bicycle: The number of these types of collisions that occurred at this location in the study period.
- Other: The number of miscellaneous collision types (mostly single vehicle) that occurred at this location in the study period.
- Aggressive, Distracted, Impaired, Dark, Wet: The number of the collisions with this factor identified as the cause of collision.

TRACY LRSP 2023

37 Table 5: Analysis Rankings – Intersections (Top Locations Per Intersection Type) Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Signalized
Intersections
Naglee Rd & W Grant Line
Rd 85 0.65 235 0 0 6 18 61 12 25 36 2 2 1 0 0 0 39 0 2 0 9 W Grant Line Rd & Tracy
Blvd 65 0.22 136 0 0 1 12 52 13 7 36 2 4 0 0 1 1 38 0 0 0 5 N Corral Hollow Rd & 11th St 63 0.15 336 0 1 5 12 45 16 9 27 0 2 1 1 4 1 33 1 3 0 6 11th St & Tracy Blvd 48 0.77 144 0 0 2 15 31 10 11 19 1 2 1 1 1 3 20 0 2 0 1 Nivens St & W Grant Line Rd 47 -0.16 147 0 0 3 14 30 13 7 21 4 2 0 0 0 0 27 0 2 1 3 Tracy Blvd & Clover Rd 42 -0.11 97 0 0 2 7 33 8 5 21 2 1 1 0 2 0 21 0 0 0 3 W Lowell Ave & Corral
Hollow Rd 40 0.32 155 0 0 4 15 21 10 9 17 1 1 0 0 1 3 21 0 1 0 5 S Lammers Rd & 11th St 39 -0.15 619 0 3 5 8 23 13 6 11 4 3 0 0 0 0 22 0 1 1 1 W Valpico Rd & Tracy Blvd 36 0.41 121 0 0 4 9 23 8 7 11 5 1 0 1 0 3 18 0 1 1 4 Corral Hollow Rd & W
Schulte Rd 36 -0.01 66 0 0 1 4 31 5 5 14 2 7 0 1 0 1 18 0 3 1 4 Lincoln Blvd & Lincoln Blvd 35 0.11 264 1 0 2 9 23 5 5 15 0 7 0 1 2 2 13 0 5 0 2 Tracy Blvd & I-205 Ramp 33 0.27 78 0 0 1 7 25 14 8 5 1 3 0 0 2 2 11 0 1 0 2 Corral Hollow Rd & Byron Rd 32 -0.12 107 0 0 3 9 20 10 1 16 1 2 0 1 0 2 20 0 0 0 4 Corral Hollow Rd &
Fieldview Dr 29 -0.06 129 0 0 4 12 13 7 3 16 0 2 0 0 0 2 21 0 0 0 4 Alden Glen Dr & Byron Rd 27 -0.13 72 0 0 2 5 20 3 3 12 3 4 0 0 1 2 14 0 0 0 2 Holly Dr & W Grant Line Rd 26 0.09 72 0 0 0 9 17 8 4 10 1 2 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 0 2 W Grant Line Rd & Henley
Pkwy 25 -0.30 224 0 1 0 7 17 5 2 14 1 0 0 1 1 1 16 0 0 0 2 TRACY LRSP 2023

38 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
W Lowell Ave & Tracy Blvd 24 0.02 59 0 0 1 5 18 9 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 3 Lincoln Blvd & W Grant Line
Rd 24 -0.11 248 0 1 2 8 13 9 3 6 4 0 0 0 2 2 12 0 0 0 4 Holly Dr & 11th St 23 0.05 53 0 0 1 4 18 6 6 5 2 0 0 0 1 1 13 0 0 0 2 N Mac Arthur Dr & 11th St 23 0.08 53 0 0 0 6 17 2 1 13 2 3 0 1 0 1 12 0 4 0 3 11th St & East St 22 -0.02 52 0 0 0 6 16 10 4 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 14 0 1 0 4 E Grant Line Rd & N
Macarthur Dr 22 -0.12 42 0 0 1 2 19 6 8 3 1 2 0 0 2 1 8 0 0 0 2 Tracy Blvd & Central Ave 21 0.17 240 0 1 2 7 11 5 5 6 0 3 0 0 1 1 15 0 1 1 2 Tracy Blvd & W Schulte Rd 21 -0.05 244 0 1 3 6 11 5 5 4 1 2 0 0 3 2 7 0 0 0 2 W Grant Line Rd & Orchard
Pkwy 21 -0.30 61 0 0 1 6 14 8 3 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 1 Naglee Rd & I-205 Ramp 21 0.14 46 0 0 0 5 16 5 1 9 4 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 1 East St & E Grant Line Rd 19 -0.21 44 0 0 1 3 15 5 4 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 2 Tracy Blvd & W Kavanagh
Ave 19 -0.30 64 0 0 2 5 12 8 2 5 2 1 1 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 1 E Pescadero Ave & N
Macarthur Dr 16 -0.28 46 0 0 0 6 10 5 2 7 1 1 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 1 Tracy Blvd & Eaton Ave 13 -0.24 33 0 0 0 4 9 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 Parker Ave & W Grant Line
Rd 13 -0.05 28 0 0 1 1 11 6 1 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 1
11th St & Shopping Plaza
east of Corral Hollow Rd 13 -0.19 202 0 1 1 3 8 5 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 S Macarthur Dr & W Schulte
Rd 12 -0.02 196 1 0 1 2 8 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 1 0 0
N Fabian St & E Hamilton Ln 12 -0.04 27 0 0 1 1 10 5 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 S Macarthur Dr & Valpico Rd 11 -0.16 195 0 1 1 2 7 3 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

39 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Alegre Dr & Corral Hollow
Rd 11 -0.29 16 0 0 0 1 10 3 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
N MacArthur Dr & I-205
Ramp 11 -0.24 26 0 0 0 3 8 2 2 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Central Ave & W Schulte Rd 10 -0.18 49 0 0 4 0 6 5 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 2 0 0 Schulte Rd & Lauriana Ln 10 -0.18 40 0 0 2 2 6 3 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 Tennis Ln & Tracy Blvd 10 -0.26 25 0 0 0 3 7 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 11th St & Crossroads Dr 10 -0.37 209 0 1 1 5 3 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 Tracy Blvd & I-205 Ramp 10 -0.32 20 0 0 0 2 8 0 4 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 W Schulte Rd & Sycamore
Pkwy 9 -0.12 39 0 0 2 2 5 1 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 1 0 1
Corral Hollow Rd & Cypress
Dr 9 -0.35 44 0 0 1 5 3 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0
Central Ave & 10th St 9 -0.14 24 0 0 1 1 7 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 W Grant Line Rd & Shopping
Plaza east of Byron Rd 9 -0.22 29 0 0 0 4 5 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 Bessie Ave & Vallerand Rd 9 -0.25 28 0 0 2 0 7 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 1 Naglee Rd & Tracy Pavillion
Plaza 9 -0.28 19 0 0 0 2 7 1 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Glenbriar Dr & Valpico Rd 8 -0.25 23 0 0 1 1 6 2 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 Tracy Blvd & 6th St 8 -0.31 13 0 0 0 1 7 2 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 Parker Ave & 11th St 8 -0.27 33 0 0 1 3 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 Grant Line Rd & Shopping
Plaza west of the I-205 8 -0.31 28 0 0 1 2 5 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 Tracy Blvd & Beechnut Ave 7 -0.32 181 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 1 S Lammers Rd & W Byron Rd 7 -0.25 31 0 0 2 1 4 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 W Lowell Ave & Lincoln Blvd 6 -0.12 6 0 0 0 0 6 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 TRACY LRSP 2023

40 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
205 Ramp & W Grant Line
Rd 6 -0.41 16 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2
Robertson & Naglee Rd 6 -0.38 6 0 0 0 0 6 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Valpico Rd & Shopping Plaza
east of Tracy Blvd 6 -0.34 21 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 Corral Hollow Rd &
Calaveras Ct 5 -0.41 25 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Byron Rd & Grant Line Rd 5 -0.21 10 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 Maplecrest Ct & Tracy Blvd 4 -0.44 9 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 S Macarthur Dr & Yosemite
Dr 4 -0.43 9 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Chrisman Rd & E Grant Line
Rd 4 -0.40 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Corral Hollow Rd &
Starflower Dr 3 -0.47 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 West St & 11th St 3 -0.46 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Macarthur Dr & 205 Ramp 3 -0.47 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unsignalized
Intersections
S Lammers Rd & W Grant
Line Rd 25 1.0 95 0 0 3 8 14 4 3 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 2 0 Toste Rd & W Grant Line Rd 23 0.2 48 0 0 1 3 19 6 6 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 Corral Hollow Rd & W Linne
Rd 16 0.2 36 0 0 0 4 12 8 0 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 11 0 1 1 1
Corral Hollow Rd & Krohn Rd 16 0.3 51 0 0 1 5 10 7 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 1 Buthmann Rd & W Grant
Line Rd 16 0.4 51 0 0 1 5 10 9 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 Bessle Ave & 12th St 13 0.4 43 0 0 1 4 8 9 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

41 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
W Schulte Rd & Morris
Phelps Dr 11 0.3 41 0 0 2 2 7 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 1 Macarthur Dr & 6th St 11 0.3 195 0 1 1 2 7 3 0 3 2 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 1 B St & 10th St 11 0.7 41 0 0 2 2 7 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Madison Ave & Beverly Pl 11 0.0 51 0 0 1 6 4 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Parker Ave & Carlton Way 11 0.6 26 0 0 0 3 8 6 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Valpico Rd & Sycamore Pkwy 10 0.07 30 0 0 0 4 6 8 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 0 1 0 2 Corral Hollow Rd & Seville Dr 10 1.93 35 0 0 1 3 6 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Paradise Rd & E Grant Line
Rd 10 0.19 25 0 0 0 3 7 1 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2
Macarthur Dr & E Mount
Diablo Ave 9 0.10 54 0 0 2 5 2 3 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 W Mount Diablo Ave &
Tracy Blvd 9 0.03 29 0 0 1 2 6 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 Centre Court Dr & Tracy Blvd 9 0.15 14 0 0 0 1 8 1 3 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 11th St & 10th St 9 -0.02 9 0 0 0 0 9 2 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 B St & 11th St 9 0.25 24 0 0 1 1 7 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 F St & 11th St 9 0.28 178 1 0 0 1 7 3 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 Parker Ave & Eaton Ave 9 0.23 34 0 0 1 3 5 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 Bessie Ave & Beverly Pl 9 0.27 19 0 0 0 2 7 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Holly Dr & W Lowell Ave 9 0.10 14 0 0 0 1 8 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Tracy Blvd & Cordoza Rd 9 -0.03 33 0 0 2 1 6 2 3 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 Central Ave & 4th St 8 0.18 23 0 0 1 1 6 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 Parker Ave & 12th St 8 0.13 33 0 0 1 3 4 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 W Grant Line Rd & 23rd St 8 0.06 28 0 0 1 2 5 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

42 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Holly Dr & E Larch Rd 8 0.24 28 0 0 1 2 5 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Naglee Rd & Auto Plaza Dr 8 0.07 28 0 0 1 2 5 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S Tracy Blvd & W Linne Rd 7 -0.03 7 0 0 0 0 7 2 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 Corral Hollow Rd & Golden
Leaf Ln 7 -0.07 22 0 0 0 3 4 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tracy Blvd & 4th St 7 0.16 12 0 0 0 1 6 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 A St & 11th St 7 0.13 12 0 0 0 1 6 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S Lammers Rd & Fabian Rd 7 0.29 7 0 0 0 0 7 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Chester Dr & W Lowell Ave 7 0.03 191 0 1 0 4 2 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 W Lowell Ave & Emerson
Ave 7 0.01 17 0 0 0 2 5 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0
Ohara Dr & W Grant Line Rd 7 -0.02 195 0 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 Corral Hollow Rd &
Kavanagh Ave 7 0.03 32 0 0 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Holly Dr & Clover Rd 7 0.12 22 0 0 1 1 5 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 International Pkwy & W
Schulte Rd 6 -0.12 175 0 1 0 1 4 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hansen Rd & W Schulte Rd 6 0.04 16 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 S Leeward Way &
Elissagaray Dr 6 0.27 21 0 0 1 1 4 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Chrisman Rd & Paradise Ave 6 0.96 16 0 0 0 2 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Natalie Ln & Mount Oso Ave 6 -0.03 21 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Central Ave & 3rd St 6 0.03 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 Central Ave & 8th St 6 0.22 11 0 0 0 1 5 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Belconte Dr & W 11th St 6 -0.10 25 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 Cochran Dr & Summer Ln 6 -0.10 179 0 1 1 0 4 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

43 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Bessie Ave & 11th St 6 -0.02 6 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Roosevelt Ave & 11th St 6 0.01 11 0 0 0 1 5 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walnut St & Eaton Ave 6 0.24 6 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Colony Dr & Essex Ct 6 -0.07 11 0 0 0 1 5 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Tracy Blvd & Apartments
Tracy Garden 6 -0.08 6 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Tracy Blvd & Holiday Inn 6 -0.04 16 0 0 0 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Corral Hollow Rd & Peony Dr 5 -0.07 10 0 0 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Windsong Dr & Tracy Blvd 5 -0.06 15 0 0 1 0 4 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 Westwood Dr & Whispering
Wind Dr 5 0.48 15 0 0 0 2 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Gandy Dancer Dr & Tracy
Blvd 5 -0.03 24 0 0 2 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Pebblebrook Dr & Valpico
Rd 5 -0.02 10 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Chrisman Rd & Valpico Rd 5 0.13 10 0 0 0 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Central Ave & Sycamore
Pkwy 5 0.41 20 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
S Macarthur Dr & Eastlake
Dr 5 -0.04 20 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Macarthur Dr & Wagtail Dr 5 -0.05 15 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 N Mac Arthur Dr & E
Hamilton Ln 5 -0.08 15 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Sequoia Blvd & Beechnut
Ave 5 0.07 40 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Tracy Blvd & 9th St 5 -0.05 10 0 0 0 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 N Mac Arthur Dr & 11th St 5 0.15 174 1 0 0 1 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 TRACY LRSP 2023

44 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Adam St & 11th St 5 0.02 174 0 1 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Holly Dr & W Highland Ave 5 0.13 10 0 0 0 1 4 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Bessle Ave & W Grant Line
Rd 5 -0.08 15 0 0 0 2 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
Bessie Ave & Eaton Ave 5 0.01 10 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Holly Dr & Eaton Ave 5 0.01 20 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Belconte Dr & Byron Rd 5 -0.08 20 0 0 1 1 3 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Bessie Ave & Carlton Way 5 0.16 10 0 0 0 1 4 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 Deborah St & E Lowell Ave 5 0.03 5 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 Bessie Ave & W Lowell Ave 5 -0.03 20 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 Lankershire Dr & Byron Rd 5 0.07 15 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Laurelbrook Dr & Lowell Ave 5 0.01 10 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 Cindy Way & Lowell Ave 5 -0.02 5 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 East St & Emerson Ave 5 0.18 5 0 0 0 0 5 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Parker Ave & W Whittier
Ave 5 0.01 169 0 1 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Holly Dr & 20th St 5 0.21 25 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 East St & 20th St 5 0.06 15 0 0 1 0 4 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 Thames Dr & Dove Dr 4 0.27 14 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 Monument Dr & Sycamore
Pkwy 4 0.03 9 0 0 0 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Arches Ct & Parkside Dr 4 0.05 9 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 W Schulte Rd & Weeping
Willow Ct 4 0.02 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Joronollo Dr & Schulte Rd 4 0.21 4 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

45 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Amaretto Dr & Cedar
Mountain Dr 4 0.17 14 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Gianelli St & Schulte Rd 4 -0.10 178 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Thomas Dehaven Ln &
Tennis Ln 4 -0.01 28 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Central Ave & 1st St 4 -0.07 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 A St & 9th St 4 0.03 9 0 0 0 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Windeler Ave & 10th St 4 0.03 9 0 0 0 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Taft Ave & 10th St 4 0.03 9 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roosevelt Ave & 10th St 4 -0.06 23 0 0 2 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 F St & 10th St 4 -0.02 9 0 0 0 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E St & 11th St 4 -0.03 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Alden Glen Dr & Byron Rd 4 -0.08 14 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 Mariani Ct & Stoneridge Dr 4 -0.09 4 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crossroads Dr & Tolbert Dr 4 0.29 9 0 0 0 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Ferngrove Ln & Maplegrove
Ln 4 0.47 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0
Lincoln Blvd & Beverly Pl 4 -0.06 19 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 East St & Acacia St 4 0.04 9 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Promenade Cir & W Lowell
Ave 4 0.06 173 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1
Parker Ave & W Lowell Ave 4 -0.07 19 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Chabot Ct & E Grant Line Rd 4 -0.05 9 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 Lincoln Blvd & Michelle Ave 4 -0.03 14 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ackles Ct & Corral Hollow Rd 4 -0.11 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

46 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Wall St & Emerson Ave 4 0.29 14 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Bessie Ave & W Whittier Ave 4 -0.09 4 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 Tracy Blvd & W Whittier Ave 4 -0.11 173 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 East St & 22nd St 4 -0.06 4 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Entrada Way & E Portola
Way 4 -0.08 14 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Buthmann Ave & Cordoza
Rd 4 0.20 9 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Naglee Rd & Corral Hollow
Rd 4 -0.07 19 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lincoln Blvd & Kavanagh Ave 4 0.00 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Camellia Dr & Kavanagh Ave 4 0.00 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Buthmann Ave & W
Kavanagh Ave 4 -0.03 9 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S Tracy Blvd & W Sugar Rd 4 0.07 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Schulte Ct & W Schulte Rd 3 -0.14 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 S Macarthur Dr & Fairoaks
Rd 3 -0.09 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
English Oak Ave &
Whispering Wind Dr 3 0.11 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Sycamore Pkwy & Tracy Blvd 3 -0.12 172 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Mission Ct & Valpico Rd 3 -0.10 18 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 Valpico Rd & Unnamed Rd
east of Mission Ct 3 -0.09 18 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 11th St & Glenbriar Cir 3 0.11 167 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 Lakeview Dr & Valpico Rd 3 -0.07 13 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

47 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Tracy Blvd & Loma Verde
Way 3 -0.07 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Monument Dr & Tracy Blvd 3 -0.08 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S Lammers Rd & Redbridge
Rd 3 -0.12 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
S Lammers Rd & Jackson Ave 3 -0.13 13 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 West St & W Mount Diablo
Ave 3 -0.04 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Quail Meadows Ln & Schulte
Rd 3 -0.12 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
B St & 1st St 3 0.11 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 Renown Dr & Tennis Ln 3 -0.08 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Cypress Dr & Larrlana Ln 3 -0.04 13 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 C St & 4th St 3 -0.08 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Barcelona Dr & Cypress Dr 3 0.11 8 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Crossroads Dr & Jakson Ave 3 0.23 13 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Central Ave & 7th St 3 -0.06 172 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Alden Glen Dr & Locust Dr 3 -0.04 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 E St & 9th St 3 -0.06 172 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Central Ave & 9th St 3 -0.09 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 C St & 9th St 3 -0.02 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taft Ave & 9th St 3 -0.01 13 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Peacock Ct & Sequoia Blvd 3 -0.01 8 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11th St & Unnamed Rd
south of N MacArthur Dr 3 -0.13 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Central Ave & Gillette Aly 3 -0.04 8 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

48 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
A St & Gillette Aly 3 0.11 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Wood Thrush Ln & Sequoia
Blvd 3 -0.04 13 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Jefferson Pkwy & 11th St 3 -0.14 8 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Macarthur Dr & N
Macarthur Dr 3 -0.04 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 East St & 12th St 3 -0.09 8 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Belconte Dr & Redington Dr 3 -0.09 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parker Ave & W Highland
Ave 3 -0.06 13 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Valerie Ln & Lincoln Blvd 3 -0.08 8 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 East St & Eaton Ave 3 -0.09 167 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schleiger Dr & Berkeley St 3 0.23 13 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Crossroads Dr & Gaines Ct 3 0.23 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Gentry Ln & Anthony Dr 3 0.11 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Parker Ave & Beverly Pl 3 -0.10 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 East St & E Hollywood Ave 3 -0.06 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Promenade Cir & Fieldview
Dr 3 0.11 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
East St & Beverly Pl 3 -0.09 8 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Annie Ct & Vera Ln 3 0.23 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Bristol Ln & Oxford Ln 3 0.11 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bessie Ave & Emerson Ave 3 -0.06 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 East St & 21st St 3 -0.08 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parker Ave & 23rd St 3 0.01 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

49 Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
W Grant Line Rd & Unnamed
Rd east of Holly Dr 3 -0.11 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Travao Ln & Travao Ln 3 -0.14 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 Elsinore Dr & W Kavanagh
Ave 3 -0.04 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Holly Dr & E Manzanita Ln 3 -0.09 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Golden Springs Dr &
Kavanagh Ave 3 -0.09 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Holly Dr & E Kavanagh Ave 3 -0.05 8 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Butler Ct & W Kavanagh Ave 3 -0.03 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Corbett Ln & Kavanagh Ave 3 -0.04 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Clover Rd & Unnamed Rd
east of Gabriel Dr 3 -0.04 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Mac Arthur Dr & Arbor
Ave 3 -0.12 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
- 1. Local Critical Crash Rate Differential & 2. Equivalent Property Damage Only Crash

TRACY LRSP 2023

50 Table 6: Analysis Rankings – Segments (Top Locations Per Segment Type) Facility Limits
Crashes
Local CCR
Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Other Principal
Arterial
W Grant Line Rd Naglee Rd-Signal e/o
Lammers Rd 23 0.5 69 0 0 0 9 14 7 6 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 Grant Line Rd Byron Rd-Lammers Rd 23 2.3 92 0 0 4 6 13 1 0 19 1 1 1 0 0 0 19 0 1 2 2 N Macarthur Dr Grant Line Rd-
Stonebridge Dr 19 0.3 73 0 0 4 3 12 2 2 0 4 8 2 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 W Grant Line Rd Ohara Dr-Tracy Bl 14 0.6 208 0 1 1 4 8 6 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 W Grant Line Rd S Lammers Rd-Byron Rd 13 1.0 53 0 0 2 4 7 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 1 0 Essex Ct Grant Line Rd-Grant Line
Rd 11 7.2 31 0 0 1 2 8 6 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1
W Grant Line Rd Naglee Rd-Toste Rd 10 0.7 0 2 3 5 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tracy Blvd Schulte Rd-Menay Dr 7 0.6 17 0 0 0 2 5 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 11th St Corral Hollow Rd-Alden
Glen Dr 7 -0.1 12 0 0 0 1 6 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 11th St Civic Center Dr-
Macarthur Dr 7 0.7 17 0 0 1 0 6 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 Hawthorne Rd Buthmann Ave-Briar Ln 7 0.0 171 0 1 0 0 6 3 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11th St 205 Ramp-Lammers Rd 6 -0.2 21 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 Valpico Rd S Macarthur Dr-
Glenbriar Dr 5 0.4 15 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 11th St Lincoln Blvd-9th St 5 0.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 11th St Belconte Dr-N Corral
Hollow Rd 5 -0.1 30 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 11th St Jefferson Ln-Crossroads
Dr 5 -0.2 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
11th St Jefferson Ln- Lammers
Rd 5 -0.2 10 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2
TRACY LRSP 2023

51 Facility Limits
Crashes
Local CCR
Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
11th St Alden Glen Dr- Lincoln
Blvd 5 -0.2 183 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0
Corral Hollow Rd Foothill Ranch Dr- Lowell
Ave 5 0.0 20 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
W Grant Line Rd Orchard Pkwy-N Corral
Hollow Rd 5 -0.2 20 0 0 1 1 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Tracy Blvd Beechnut Ave- Centre
Court Dr 4 0.0 23 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Corral Hollow Rd Cypress Dr-Crohn Rd 4 0.0 14 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 E Grantline Rd MacArthur Dr-Skylark
Way 4 -0.1 331 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
E Grant Line Rd Colony Dr-N MacArthur
Dr 4 -0.1 9 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
W Grant Line Rd Buthmann Ave-Palker
Ave 4 0.2 19 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
W Grant Line Rd Joe Pombo Pkwy-
Orchard Pkwy 4 -0.2 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 W Schulte Rd Larrlana Ln-Sycamore
Pkwy 3 -0.2 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Macarthur Dr Wagtail Dr-6th St 3 0.1 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Corral Hollow Rd Grant Line Rd-Alegre Dr 3 -0.3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 W Grant Line Rd Parker Ave-Altoga Ave 3 -0.1 13 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Tracy Blvd Cordoza Rd-W Grant
Line Rd 3 -0.2 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
White Oak Dr
Grant Line Rd-Unnamed
Rd west of N MacArthur
Dr
3 -0.2 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Minor Arterial
TRACY LRSP 2023

52 Facility Limits
Crashes
Local CCR
Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
PDO
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Distracted
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Royal Ct
Grant Line Rd-Pavillon
Pkwy 9 0.3 19 0 0 0 2 7 2 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
W Byron Rd Belconte Dr-Berg Rd 6 0.4 31 0 0 1 3 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 E Grantline Rd City Limits-Chabot Ct 5 0.8 15 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 W Linne Rd Tracy Bl-Tracy Airport Ctr 4 0.0 19 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 W Linne Rd Tracy Airport Ctr-Corral
Hollow Rd 4 0.0 19 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 W Lowell Ave Chester Dr-Tracy Bl 4 -0.1 9 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Holly Dr E Larch Rd-Sloan Ct 4 0.9 9 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 W Lowell Ave Corral Hollow Rd-
Promenade Cir 3 0.6 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major Collector
Corral Hollow Rd I-580-Linne Rd 27 6.0 288 0 1 9 2 15 3 3 3 5 6 6 1 0 0 6 0 0 9 0 W Clover Rd Tracy Blvd-Buthmann
Ave 8 1.7 33 0 0 1 3 4 2 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
S Lammers Rd 11th St-Redbridge Rd 7 0.2 32 0 0 1 3 3 1 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 W Schulte Rd S Lammers Rd-Hansen
Rd 4 0.1 19 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Brichetto Rd Chrisman Rd-City Limits 3 0.7 167 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 Local
Pavillion Pkwy Robertson-Auto Plaza
Way 5 2.02 25 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
Hansen Rd Schulte Rd-City Limits 4 0.45 9 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Carlton Way Holly Dr-Parker Ave 4 4.68 9 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Palm Cir Alden Park-Beechnut
Ave 3 3.76 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12th St Lincoln Bl-Schleiger Dr 3 3.28 22 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRACY LRSP 2023

53 2
53 9 Emphasis Areas
Emphasis Areas are collisions factors or conditions that the City of Tracy can strategically focus efforts to have a large impact on transportation safety. Emphasis areas were developed by revisiting the Vision and Goals developed at the onset of this planning process and comparing them with the trends and patterns identified in the collision analysis. Where these areas aligned, or major challenges were observed, Emphasis Areas and strategies were developed.

9.1 Emphasis Area #1: Impaired Driving
Description: Impaired driving crashes are a high priority challenge area within the Caltrans SHSP. Caltrans defines these as crashes where any evidence of drug or alcohol use by the driver is present, even if the driver was not over the legal limit. 292 collisions, just over 8% of all collisions, were reported as the driver being under the influence of drugs or alcohol. 70% of the DUI collisions resulted in property damage only. 33% of the traffic fatalities involved a DUI.17% of the collisions in the study period were reported as the driver being under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Eight of these crashes resulted in a fatality and 27 in a severe injury. Almost 2/3 of these crashes (423) resulted in Property Damage Only.

Goal for Emphasis Area #1:.
• Reduce the number of crashes attributed to impaired driving • Identify hot spots and priority corridors for countermeasures to reduce impaired driving • Apply for funding to implement countermeasures to reduce impaired driving crashes Strategies for Emphasis Area #1:
• Authorize, publicize, and conduct sobriety checkpoints programs • Implement an impaired driving education campaign
• Develop educational programs targeting specific audiences based on age group • Additional enforcement presence
• Create effective media campaigns in both visual and print media • Implement additional lighting along corridors with high frequencies of impaired driving collisions
• Install speed control measures such as speed feedback signage or lane width reductions along corridors with high frequencies of impaired driving collisions These strategies will be implemented by the City, law enforcement, and community organizations. Funding sources for these strategies may include HSIP, OTS, and SB1 grant programs.

9.2 Emphasis Area #2: Lane Departure (Head-On, Hit Object, Overturned)
Description: Lane Departure, as defined by the Caltrans SHSP, includes head-on, hit object, and overturned collisions. This includes instances where a vehicle runs off the road or crosses into the opposing lane prior to the collision. 55.1% of fatal & severe injury collisions involved TRACY LRSP 2023

54 2
54 lane departure collisions in the City , compared to 42.1% statewide. These types of collisions were 17% of the collisions in the study period.

Goal for Emphasis Area #2:
• Reduce the number of crashes due to lane departure collisions in the City • Identify hot spots and priority corridors for lane departure collisions • Apply for funding and implement countermeasures to address lane departure collisions Strategies for Emphasis Area #2:
• Address l ane departure collisions by implementing proven countermeasures , such as guardrails, median barriers, safety edges, segment lighting, speed feedback signage Identify priority corridors for lane departure collisions and implement countermeasures on these corridors. These strategies will be implemented by the City, law enforcement, and community organizations. Funding sources for these strategies may include HSIP, OTS and SB1 grant programs.

9.3 Emphasis Area #3: Young Drivers
Description: Young drivers, as defined by the Caltrans SHSP, are drivers between 15 and 20 years of age. 13.7% of fatal & severe injury collisions involved young drivers in the City, compared to 12.3% statewide. 27% of collisions involved a driver at fault that was between the age of 16 and 25 years old.

Goal for Emphasis Area #3:
• Reduce the number severity and of young driver collisions • Identify hot spots and priority corridors for young driver collisions • Apply for funding and implement countermeasures to address young drivers Strategies for Emphasis Area #3:

Strategies to address young driver behaviors will mainly focus on education, encouragement, and enforcement. Strategies that have had success nationally include driver’s education courses, implementing technology in young drivers’ vehicles, and education campaigns to target aging drivers with messages regarding road safety, common mistakes, and challenges that young drivers face. Strategies may also include increased enforcement near hotspots of young driver collisions and increased coordination with community organizations. Strategies can also address challenges faced by inexperienced drivers by simplifying complex driving environments by reducing sign clutter and simplifying signage.

These strategies will be implemented by the City, law enforcement, and local community organizations. Funding sources for these strategies may include HSIP, STIP, and SB1 grant programs.

TRACY LRSP 2023

55 2
55 9.4 Emphasis Area #4: Vulnerable Road Users (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)
Description: Vulnerable road user collisions, as defined by the SHSP, are those identified as those involving pedestrians and bicyclists. 44% of fatal injuries in the City involved pedestrians. 21% of severe injury collisions involved pedestrians. 14% of severe injury collisions involved bicyclists.
81 pedestrian-involved collisions occurred during the study period, resulting in 4 fatal collisions, 9 severe injury collisions, and 63 with some form of reported injury or pain. About 25% of pedestrian collisions occurred while the pedestrian was crossing in the crosswalk. During the study period, 102 collisions involving bicycles were reported. Of these, six (6) resulted in severe injuries, twenty-seven (27) resulted in property damage only, and sixty-nine (69) with some form of reported injury or pain. About 23% of collisions occurred at night.

Goal for Emphasis Area #4:
• Reduce the number of collisions involving pedestrians and bicyclists • Identify high areas of pedestrians and bicycle collisions • Apply for fund ing and implement countermeasures at pedestrian and bicycle collision hotspots
Strategies for Emphasis Area #4:
• Implement pedestrian and bicycle priority detection at certain key locations • Install pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure at key locations , su ch as bicycle lanes, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), pedestrian scrambles, and Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) timing
• Install pedestrian and bicycle counters to determine where high active transportation volume locations are
• Establish education and training program to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety in the City
10 Opportunities
The following provides more information on general identified issues, crash modification factors, improvements, and countermeasures identified for the City of Tracy, as well as for specific project locations identified as part of this analysis.

10.1 Infrastructure Improvements

10.1.1 Countermeasure Selection Process
Part D of the HSM provides information on Crash Modification Factors (CMF) for roadway segments, intersections, interchanges, special facilities, and road networks. CMFs are used to estimate the safety effects of highway improvements and apply CMFs to compare and select highway safety improvements. A CMF less than 1.0 indicates that a treatment has the potential to reduce collisions. A CMF greater than 1.0 indicates that a treatment has the potential to increase collisions. The application of an appropriate CMF can influence the decision to TRACY LRSP 2023

56 2
56 implement a particular project, and the misapplication of CMFs can lead to misinformed decisions. Key factors to consider when applying CMFs include:

1. Selection of an appropriate CMF,

2. Estimation of collisions without treatment,

3. Application of CMFs by type and severity, and

4. Estimation of the combined effect for multiple treatments Examples of Safety Countermeasures can be found through several sources. This Report utilizes the countermeasures found in the California LRSM (https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot- media/programs/local-assistance/documents/hsip/2020/lrsm2020.pdf) and the CMF Clearinghouse (CMF CH) website (http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/).

Countermeasures for each of the Safety Project Case Studies are based on the data analysis and site visits. Additional countermeasures were identified for the high-level issues on a city- wide level and are discussed in General City-Wide Safety Project Opportunities in Section

10.3 of this Report.

10.1.2 Safety Project Case Studies
From the city-wide analysis, ten project case study locations were selected for further analysis and opportunity identification. For each of these locations, Safety Project Case Studies were developed to provide a case study to organize projects when applying for funding. These locations were identified through the analysis process based on their collision histories, the observed crash patterns, and their differing characteristics to provide the most insight into potential systemic safety countermeasures that the City can employ to achieve the most cost- effective safety benefits.

A Safety Project Case Study was developed for these locations:

1. Unsignalized Intersection: F Street & 11th Street

2. Unsignalized Intersection: Parker Avenue & Eaton Avenue

3. Roadway Segment: Holly Drive from Larch Road to Sloan Court

4. Roadway Segment: Pavilion Parkway from Robertson Drive to Auto Plaza Way

5. Signalized Intersection: Naglee Road & Grant Line Road

6. Roadway Segment: Grant Line Road from Lammers Road to Byron Road

7. Roadway Segment: Byron Road from Berg Road to Belconte Drive

8. Signalized Intersection: Lowell Avenue & Corral Hollow Road

9. Roadway Segment: Lammers Road from 11th Street to Redbridge Road

10. Roadway Segment: Tracy Boulevard from Schulte Road to Menay Drive Appendix A contains the Case Study pages which summarize conditions at each location, and potentially beneficial countermeasures. Countermeasures were subjected to a benefit/cost assessment and scored according to their potential return on investment. These case studies can be used to select the most appropriate countermeasure, and to potentially phase improvements over the longer-term. The potential benefit of these countermeasures at locations with similar design characteristics can then be extrapolated regardless of collision history.

These case study sheets can also be used to position the City for future grant funding opportunities.

TRACY LRSP 2023

57 2
57 10.2 Non-Infrastructure Improvements
Non-Infrastructure improvements have also been proven to impact safety conditions of the transportation network. These education and enforcement measure opportunities are developed to target specific behavior types and populations. Based on a review of the existing plans, policies, and programs within the City, the following topics have been reviewed to identify areas where the City can implement or enhance safety efforts.

Table 7: Summary of Program, Policies, and Practices
Topic
Initiatives
Status Implement or Enhance
Complete Streets
Policies
Complete streets policies
being as part of Traffic
Management Plan
Identify roadways that are good
candidates for complete street
implementation consistent with
guidance provided in these plans
Traffic Impact Fees
City assesses for capacity
improving projects and
railroad grade separation
project
Continue to assess traffic impact
fees; Devote a portion of impact fees
to safety enhancements as part of
the next Nexus update
Safe Routes to
School
Have applied for funding,
but have not been
successful; Have received
funds for signal adaptation
plan
Identify potential grant projects and
apply for grant funding
Traffic Safety
Education No Implement traffic safety education
program
Crash Activity
Review
No formal program, but
uses SWITRS on a case-
by-case basis
Set up formal program for reviewing
crash activity; update database for
future LRSP analysis & updates
Crossroads Database Yes Implement automatic daily updates of collision data into database
Active Transportation
Safety Ordinances Yes
Continue enforcement of current
laws; Begin coordination between
enforcement and school education
programs
Sobriety/Seatbelt
Checks Yes Continue sobriety & seat belt checks;
increase enforcement in hot spots
Adjacent
Jurisdictions
Coordination
Yes, coordinates with
Sherriff, County and CHP
Continue to coordinate with adjacent
jurisdictions
TRACY LRSP 2023

58 2
58 Topic
Initiatives
Status Implement or Enhance
Speed Surveys Conducts every 5 years
Continue to update as required by
California Vehicle Code; review new
guidance from Assembly Bill 43
Traffic Calming
Policies
Yes, building traffic calming
for new developments
Continue to enact traffic calming
implementations throughout the City;
Identify areas in older neighborhoods
where traffic calming policies are
appropriate
Transit
Accommodation of
Bicycles
Yes
Continue to accommodate bicycles
on transit to promote multi-modal
trips
Coordination
between City staff
and transit providers
Yes, bus stop projects are
funded by development.

City is working on a banking
fee to help funding transit
improvements
Continue coordination; work to
identify areas for improvements such
as first/last mile improvements
Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master
Plan
Policies being incorporated
into Traffic Management
Plan
Continue to update master plans
Active Transportation
Inventory No Implement active transportation
inventory
Traffic Safety Audit
Program No
Implement a traffic safety audit
program to regularly identify traffic
safety issues citywide
Coordination with
Emergency
Response
Yes, fire department is
engaged in planning
Continue engaging emergency
response in transportation planning
processes
Coordination with
Health Agencies No
Implement formal coordination
processes with local health agencies;
involve in collision analysis and
planning process
Citizen Feedback Yes, City receives
complaints
Continue to seek out resident
feedback and incorporate into
policies and implementations
Roadway
Maintenance Yes
Continue regular maintenance of
roadway surfaces; determine how
safety implementations can be
incorporated
Roadway Safety
Funding No
Continue to advance Transportation
Demand Management programs and
support per General Plan policies
TRACY LRSP 2023

59 2
59 Topic
Initiatives
Status Implement or Enhance
Transportation
Demand Management
Traffic Management Plan
identifies TDM and VMT
monitoring
Continue to advance Transportation
Demand Management programs and
support per General Plan policies
VMT Reduction
Policies
City is doing TOD
development
Continue this process; identify area
where infill development will require
safety improvements
Signage Inventory No Implement a signage inventory
Local Design
Standards
Yes, the City has design
guides that include buffered
bike lanes, green lanes, and
bus stops
Continue to implement and update
design standards
Transportation
Planning/Safety
Advisory Committee
No Implement a formal transportation
planning advisory committee
Active Transportation
Volume Collection
Standard practice, but not a
formal policy
Continue traffic & active
transportation volume collection;
utilize this data in collision analysis
Wayfinding Signage
Yes, program included in
the Bike and Parks master
plan
Continue to identify funding for
wayfinding signage; implement in
high pedestrian/bicycle locations
Traffic Control
Warrants City uses MUTCD warrants
Continue to use CA MUTCD
warrants; identify areas where
additional warrants can be used
(such as flashing stop signs)

10.3 City-wide Countermeasure Toolbox
This evaluation considered city-wide trends to identify countermeasures that would likely provide the most benefit with widespread implementation. Countermeasures for each of the 5E Safety Strategies (Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Encouragement, and Emergency Services) were identified. These include both infrastructure improvements, non-infrastructure improvements. Section 10.3 outlines the city-wide safety project improvements, which is also TRACY LRSP 2023

60 2
60 referred to as the “Countermeasure Toolbox”. Within the toolbox, the description of the countermeasure along with its LRSM ID number is listed. The next column, Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) also known as Crash Modification Factor (CMF), are “multiplicative factors used to estimate the expected number of crashes after implementing a given countermeasure at a specific site (the lower the CMF, the greater the expected reduction in crashes)4.” For each of these countermeasures, a planning level benefit/cost analysis was completed.

Applying the benefit/cost at the city-wide level was estimated assuming some randomness in crash distribution. The location characteristics, such as whether there is a traffic signal, and the type of crashes, were used at the city-wide level to calculate an average cost of crashes that the countermeasure might reduce. The benefit per location was then factored out to a 20-year life- cycle savings, with an Opinion of Project Probable Cost (OPCC). The cost shown in Table 9 should be considered initial planning costs using 2021 dollars and not assumed final.

4 LRSM Version 1ro.5 (2020), Page 27
TRACY LRSP 2023

61 Table 8: City-wide Countermeasure Toolbox
COUNTERMEASURE CMF/LRSM ID CRF 20-YEAR COST

ESTIMATE PER UNIT
Install High-Visibility Crosswalk 4124 19% $25,000 per crosswalk Install signals NS03 25% $270,000 per intersection
Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs/other intersections warning/regulatory signs (stop signs with LED borders)
NS06 15% $1,500 per sign
Install raised medians (refuge islands) NS19PB 45% $25,000 per intersection Add segment lighting R01 35% $50,000 per mile
Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone R02 35% $10,000 per location Install Median Barrier R03 25% $20,000 per location
Install Safety Edges R15 30% $100,000 per mile
Install dynamic/variable speed warning systems R26 30% $16,000 per sign install delineators, reflectors, and or object markers R27 15% $5 per LF Install edge-lines and centerlines R28 25% $8,000 per mile Install bike lane (class III/sharrows) R32PB 35% $25 per linear foot Install separated bike lanes (Class IV) R33PB 45% $250,000 per mile Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) R37PB 35% $50,000 per intersection Install retroreflective backplates S02 15% $12,000 per intersection Improve signal timing (coordination, phasing, red, yellow, operation)
S03 15% $8,000 per intersection
Install advanced dilemma zone detection S04 40% $34,000 per intersection Provide protected left-turn phase S07 30% $40,000 per intersection Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through
Intersection)
S09 10% $22,000 per intersection
Pedestrian Scramble S19PB 40% $120,000 per intersection Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
S21PB 60% $8,000 per intersection
TRACY LRSP 2023

62 2
62 Table 9 describes additional improvements for the remaining categories of traffic safety which includes Enforcement, Education, Encouragement, and Emergency Services.

Non-Engineering Safety Countermeasures:

These non-engineering countermeasures were derived from the collision analysis and build on the actions identified in Section 9.3. These relate to the additional Es of Traffic Safety outside of Engineering. This includes Enforcement, Encouragement, Education, and Emergency Services.

Table 9: Non-Engineering Safety Strategy Countermeasures

PROPOSED COUNTERMEASURE POTENTIAL PARTNERS EXAMPLES OF

COUNTERMEASURE

ENFORCEMENT
Establish enforcement and visibility
program for aggressive driving Local law enforcement; CHP CHP’s Regulate Aggressive
Driving and Reduce Speed
(RADARS) Program
Continued enforcement in school
zones
Local law enforcement; CHP;
school districts
Obtain grant funding for
additional personnel in school
zones
Increased enforcement of safe
driving & active transportation
behaviors near busy crosswalk
locations
Local law enforcement; CHP
Obtain grant funding for
additional enforcement near
high pedestrian activity
locations

EDUCATION
Campaign to target aggressive
driving and DUIs
Local law enforcement; CHP;
California Office of Traffic Safety
(OTS)
CHP’s Regulate Aggressive
Driving and Reduce Speed
(RADARS) Program
Bicycle and pedestrian safety
campaign Local law enforcement
SCAG’s ‘Go Human’
Campaign; ‘ OTS’ ‘Ride With
Traffic’ campaign
Explore safe routes to school
education grants to expand
program
Local school districts; local law
enforcement; SCAG
Safe Routes to School
Program, funded by Caltrans
Coordinate safety education
campaigns SJCOG; local law enforcement
Roadway safety fairs at
schools
Education campaign for aging
drivers

EMERGENCY SERVICES
Continue to work on
interdepartmental communication
between City staff and City police
department and fire department
Local law enforcement & fire
department
Incorporate law
enforcement/fire department
as stakeholders on
transportation improvement
projects
Incorporate public health agencies
and fire departments as
stakeholders in safety projects
Local public health agencies and
fire departments
Adjust safety project
development processes to
include public health and fire
department feedback
TRACY LRSP 2023

63 2
63 PROPOSED COUNTERMEASURE POTENTIAL PARTNERS EXAMPLES OF

COUNTERMEASURE

EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
Continue to use best practices for
pedestrian crossings at high
pedestrian traffic areas
City Public Works; Caltrans
Continuously update
pedestrian crossing design
standards in accordance with
latest best practices
Utilize new data sources to monitor
traffic conditions and inform County
safety plans
City Public Works; Caltrans Utilization of data from a
traffic management center

11 Evaluation & Implementation

11.1 Evaluation
The success of the LRSP will be evaluated using the preliminary process outlined below. This process will be useful to ensure proper implementation of goals and to determine when updates are needed.
• Quarterly progress meetings will be conducted to track the implementation of the plan. In addition, the success of the plan will be evaluated on an annual basis. • An update to the plan should be considered after no more than five years. • Continued monitoring and recording of traffic incidents on local roadways by law enforcement.
• Maintain a list of focus areas where there are transportation safety concerns.

11.2 Implementation
Implementation of the LRSP can be accomplished through several avenues including development of projects, the establishment of new policies and programs, and development/strengthening of relationships with stakeholders.

With regard to projects, the following identifies potential focus areas for the City in the near-to- mid-term.

Near- & Mid-Term Focus Areas
The opportunities identified in this report provide more of the systemic countermeasures that can be applied within the City. Over the next three to five years, the City has the opportunity to concentrate its efforts on the emphasis areas:

1. Impaired Driving

2. Lane Departure Collisions

3. Young Drivers

4. Vulnerable Road Users (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)
Analysis conducted at the citywide level indicated that these factors were some of the most frequent influences contributing to collisions within the City. The countermeasure opportunities previously discussed in this report for both systemic and project-specific improvements can be used as a basis for developing projects at locations where addressing these focus areas would TRACY LRSP 2023

64 2
64 be of the most benefit. Projects that address these focused areas can be developed with a high benefit-to-cost ratio (by applying City-wide collision rates), allowing projects to be developed even at sites with little to no direct collision history, but with conditions that might contribute to future collisions.

11.3 Funding
Competitive funding resources are available to assist in the development and implementation of safety projects in Tracy. The City should continue to seek available funding and grant opportunities from local, state, and federal resources to accelerate their ability to implement safety improvements throughout Tracy. The following is a high-level introduction into some of the main funding programs and grants for which the City can apply. In addition to the funding sources mentioned below, the City should consider examining and allocating a portion of its Measure A and other local funding sources to help fund safety improvements. The City should also work with regional agencies such as San Joaquin County Council of Governments, San Joaquin Valley Council of Governments, and Caltrans to identify and apply for safety improvement funding.

11.3.1 Highway Safety Improvement Program
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a Federal program housed under Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. This program apportions funding as a lump sum for each state, which is then divided among apportioned programs. These flexible funds can be used for projects to preserve or improve safety conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, facilities for non-motorized transportation, and other project types. Example safety improvement projects eligible for this funding include:
• New or upgraded traffic signals
• Upgraded guard rails
• Pedestrian warning flashing beacons
• Marked crosswalks
California’s local HSIP focuses on infrastructure projects with national recognized crash reduction factors. Normally HSIP call-for-projects is made at an interval of one to two years. The applicant must be a city, a county, or a tribal government federally recognized within the State of California.

Additional information regarding this program at the Federal level can be found online at:
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/. California specific HSIP information – including dates for upcoming call for projects – can be found at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hsip.html.

11.3.2 Caltrans Active Transportation Program
Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) is a statewide funding program, created in 2013, consolidating several federal and state programs. The ATP funds projects that encourage increased mode share for walking and bicycling, improve mobility and safety for non-motorized users, enhance public health, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Projects eligible for this funding include:
• Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects
• Bicycle and pedestrian planning projects (e.g. safe routes to school) TRACY LRSP 2023

65 2
65 • Non-infrastructure programs (education and enforcement) This program funding is provided annually. The ATP call for projects typically comes out in the spring. Information on this program and cycles can be found online at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/

11.3.3 State Transportation Improvement Program
The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) provides state and federal gas tax money for improvements both on and off the state highway system. STIP programming occurs every two years. The programming cycle begins with the release of a proposed fund estimate, followed by California Transportation Commission (CTC) adoption of the fund estimate. The fund estimate serves to identify the amount of new funds available for the programming of transportation projects. Once the fund estimate is adopted, Caltrans and the regional planning agencies prepare transportation improvement plans for submittal. Caltrans prepares the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) using Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds, and regional agencies prepare Regional Transportation Improvement Programs (RTIPs) using Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. The STIP is then adopted by the CTC.

11.3.4 California Senate Bill 1 (SB 1)
SB 1 is a landmark transportation investment to rebuild California by fixing neighborhood streets, freeways, and bridges in communities across California and targeting funds toward transit and congested trade and commute corridor improvements.

California’s state-maintained transportation infrastructure will receive roughly half of SB 1 revenue: $26 billion. The other half will go to local roads, transit agencies, and an expansion of the state’s growing network of pedestrian and cycle routes. Each year, this new funding will be used to tackle deferred maintenance needs both on the state highway system and the local road system, including:
• Bike and Pedestrian Projects: $100 million
o This will go to cities, counties and regional transportation agencies to build or convert more bike paths, crosswalks and sidewalks. It is a significant increase in funding for these projects through the Active Transportation Program (ATP). • Local Planning Grants: $25 million

11.3.5 California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grants This program has funding for projects related to traffic safety, including transportation safety education and encouragement activities. Grants applications must be supported by local crash data (such as the data analyzed in this report) and must relate to the following priority program areas:
• Alcohol Impaired Driving
• Distracted Driving
• Drug-Impaired Emergency Medical Services
• Motorcycle Safety
• Occupant Protection
• Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
• Police Traffic Services
TRACY LRSP 2023

66 2
66 • Public Relations, Advertising, and Marketing Program • Roadway Safety and Traffic Records

11.4 Next Steps
The City of Tracy has completed this LRSP to guide the process of future transportation safety improvements for years to come. The data-driven analysis process identified collision types, related primary collision factors, and locations of many collisions. Based on this process, Emphasis Areas were developed. These Emphasis Areas will guide corridor improvements, education programs, and capital improvements for the City.

Using the analyzed data and outputs from this LRSP, the City has also completed, or plans to complete, the following tasks:
• Actively seek other funding opportunities to improve safety for all modal users • Collaborate with established safety pa rtners & neighboring municipalities as improvements are made to create a cohesive transportation network • Iteratively evaluate existing and proposed transportation safety programs and capital improvements to design a safer transportation network in Tracy. • Begin designing safety improvements identified in the Case Study sheets contained in this report.

Based on current Caltrans guidelines, the LRSP is valid for 5 years from the date of completion for eligibility for HSIP grant funding.

APPENDIX A – CASE STUDY SHEETS

Project Name: Tracy LRSP
Agency Name: Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Case Study Sheet: Location #1
Project Location Description & Maps:

Intersection: F St and 11th St (Unsignalized Intersection) Examples of Similar Intersections: 11th St & E St, 11th St & Adam St Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Number of Approaches 4
Total Entering Vehicles 8,863
Crosswalk Condition No crosswalk on NB
leg
Control Type Two way stop
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
Median No
Collision Data
Total Collisions 9
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 1
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 0
Top 2 Collision Types Broadside (33%)
Rear-End (33%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 4
Wet Surface Collisions 0
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 1

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
7 1 0
*
Legend
Broadside
Rear-End
Sideswipe
Hit Object
Vehicle-Pedestrian
*
N
11th St
F St
Additional Notes:
• Speeding is concern - speed limit is 35, observed higher • High pedestrian activity including students (East and 11th St is entrance to HS) • Fatal pedestrian collision (involved peestrian under inluence, not within marked crosswalk) • Adjacent to signal at East and 11st St
N
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary Issues Potential Counter-
measures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
Bike & Pedestrian Install Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon (RRFB)

0.65 (R37PB) $3,066,00 $50,000 61.32
Bike & Pedestrian
Install high-visibility
crosswalks (possibly
Triple-4 style)

0.81 (4124) $1,664,400 $50,000 33.29
All
Install/upgrade larger or
additional stop signs/ other
intersections warning/
regulatory signs (stop signs
with LED borders)

0.85 (NS06) $1,418,400 $3,000 472.80
All Provide protected left-turn
phase

0.70 (S07) $2,836,800 $40,000 70.92
All
Improve signal timing
(coordination, phasing, red,
yellow, operation)

0.85 (S03) $1,418,400 $8,000 177.30
All
Install raised pavement
markers and striping
(through intersection)

0.90 (S09) $945,600 $22,000 42.98
Project Name: Tracy LRSP
Agency Name: City of Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Case Study Sheet: Location #2
Project Location Description & Maps:

Intersection: Parker Ave & Eaton Ave (Unsignalized Intersection) Examples of Similar Intersections: Parker Ave & Carlton Way, E Lowell Ave & Mae Ave Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Number of Approaches 4
Total Entering Vehicles 10,000
Crosswalk Condition 4 striped crosswalks
Control Type 4 way stop
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
Median No
Collision Data
Total Collisions 9
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 1
Top 4 Collision Types Broadside (66.7%)
Rear-End (11.1%)
Sideswipe (11.1%)
Vehicle-Pedestrian
(11.1%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 3
Wet Surface Collisions 2
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
5 2 0
PC
PC
Legend
Broadside
Rear-End
Sideswipe
Parked Car
Vehicle-Pedestrian
PC
2 N
Eaton Ave
Parker Ave
Additional Notes:
• High number of broadsides at all-way stop
• Inattention may contribute to crash pattern
• Drivers not adhering to left turn restriction at school driveway (Central Elementary) N
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary Issues Potential Counter-
measures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All Install high-visibility
crosswalk

0.81 (4124) $122,968 $25,000 4.92
All
Install raised pavement
markers and striping
(through intersection)

0.90 (S09) $180,600 $22,000 8.21
All Install edge-lines and
centerlines

0.75 (R28) $451,500 $8,000 56.44
Project Name: T racy LRSP
Agency Name: City of Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Project Template: Location #3
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Holly Dr - Larch Rd to Sloan Ct (Minor Arterial) Examples of Similar Segments: N Tracy Blvd - W Larch Rd to W Sugar Rd; Corral Hollow Rd - W Larch Rd to W Clover Rd
Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,000
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
Collision Data
Total Collisions 4
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 0
Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Head-On (25%)
Sideswipe (25%)
Vehicle-Pedestrian (25%)
Not Stated (25%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 3
Wet Surface Collisions 0
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
0 1 0
*
*
*
Legend
Sideswipe
Hit Object
Vehicle-Pedestrian
*
N

SEGMENT
Holly Dr
Additional Notes:
• 3 out of 4 collisions were hit objects
• No continuous sidewalk on northside
• Transient population in this area
Larch Rd
N
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety Related
B/C
Bike & Ped Install green paint in
bicycle lanes

0.65 (R32PB) $113,260 $50,000 2.27
Bike & Ped Install separated bike
lanes (Class IV)

0.55 (R33PB) $145,620 $94,750 1.54
Bike &
Pedestrian Add segment lighting 0.65
(R01) $169,120 $18,950 8.92
Hit Object
Remove or relocate fixed
objects outside of Clear
Recovery Zone

0.65 (R02) $169,120 $10,000 16.91
Project Name: T racy LRSP
Agency Name: City of Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Project Template: Location #4
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Pavilion Pkwy/Auto Plaza Dr: Robertson Dr to Auto Plaza Way (Local Roadway) Examples of Similar Segments: Naglee Rd - W Valley Mall to Auto Plaza Dr; Joe Pombo Pkwy - Grant Line Rd to Birdie Creek Cir
Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,500
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH
Collision Data
Total Collisions 5
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 1
Top Collision Types
(percentage)
Head-On (40%)
Broadside (20%)
Hit Object (20%)
Sideswipe (20%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 2
Wet Surface Collisions 2
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 1

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
2 0 0
*
*
*
PC
Legend
Broadside
Sideswipe
Hit Object
Vehicle-Pedestrian
*
N

SEGMENT
Power Rd
Additional Notes:
• Lower priority location
• Tire marks in middle of intersection of Power Rd/Pavilion Pkwy • Relatively low volumes currently, but in development area • Truck deliveries for adjacent commercial uses
Auto Plaza
N
Pavilion Pkwy
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety Related
B/C
All Install reflective markers 0.85
(R27) $198,420 $10,000 19.84
Dark Add segment lighting 0.65
(R01) $462,980 $9,450 48.99
All Upgrade signage 0.85
(NS06) $198,420 $6,000 33.07
Project Name: Tracy LRSP
Agency Name: Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Case Study Sheet: Location #5
Project Location Description & Maps:

Intersection: Naglee Rd & Grant Line Rd (Signalized Intersection) Examples of Similar Intersections: Grant Line Rd & Toste Rd/I-205, Naglee Rd & Pavillion Parkway Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Number of Approaches 4
Total Entering Vehicles 40,765
Crosswalk Condition 3 Legs with Pedestrian
Timing
Control Type Signalized
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
Median Yes
Collision Data
Total Collisions 85
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 6
Top 2 Collision Types Rear-End (42.4%)
Sideswipe (29.4%)
Broadside (14.1%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 18
Wet Surface Collisions 9
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 3

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
80 0 0
2 *
*
5 3
7 2
3 4
4 3
2 2
*
2 o
Legend
Broadside
Head-On
Rear-End
Sideswipe
Hit Object
Overturned
*
o
* 7 collisions had collision type listed as ‘Not
Stated’ and are not shown on this diagram
N
Grant Line Rd
Naglee Rd
Additional Notes:
• Top crash location in city
• Southbound right turn traffic observed not stopping on red (conflicts with eastbound U-turns) • 8-inch signal heads
• Aggressive drivers (adjacent to freeway ramps)
• Wide westbound right slip lane
N
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary Issues Potential Counter-
measures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety
Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All Install retroflective
backplates

0.85 (S02) $1,872,780 $12,000 156.07
Bike & Pedestrian Install green paint in bicycle
lanes

0.65 (R32PB) - $15,000 -
All
Adjust signal timing
(coordination, phasing, red,
yellow, operation)

0.85 (S03) $1,872,780 $8,000 234.10
All
Install through arrow signal
heads on WB movement to
reinforce no LTs

0.70 (NS03) $3,743,560 $75,000 24.97
All Provide protected left-turn
phase

0.70 (S07) $3,745,560 $40,000 93.64
All Install advanced dilemma
zone detection

0.60 (S04) $3,745,560 $34,000 110.16
All Install High-Visibility
Crosswalk

0.81 (4124) - $75,000 -
All Install raised medians
(refuge islands)

0.55 (NS19PB) $5,618,340 $75,000 74.91
All Upgrade 8” signal heads to
12” signal heads

0.85 (S02) $1,872,780 $12,000 156.07
Project Name: Tracy LRSP
Agency Name: Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Project Template: Location #6
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Grant Line Rd - Lammers Rd to Byron Rd (Principal Arterial) Examples of Similar Segments: Grant Line Rd - N MacArthur Dr to Skylark Way, Byron Rd - Grant Line Rd to Von Sosten Rd
Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10,000
Lighting No
Highest Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
Collision Data
Total Collisions 23
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 4
Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Rear-End (82.6%)
Broadside (4.3%)
Head-On (4.3%)
Hit Object (4.3%)
Overturned (4.3%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 12
Wet Surface Collisions 2
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 1

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
20 0 0
*4
3 5*
2 23
Legend
Broadside
Rear-End
Hit Object
*
N

SEGMENT
Byron Rd
Additional Notes:
• Recent/ongoing construction at this location
• Closely spaced driveways
• High speeds observed along Grant Line Rd
• Residential development is recent (4 collisions in 2016, 4 in 2017, 6 in 2018, and 9 in 2019) • Lammers Rd is recently signalized
Grant Line Lammers
N
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety Related
B/C
All Install dynamic/variable
speed warning systems

0.70 (R26) $1,473,000 $32,000 46.03
All
Install/upgrade larger or
additional stop signs/
other intersections
warning/regulatory signs
(stop signs with LED
borders)

0.85 (NS06) $736,500 $9,000 81.83
Project Name: Tracy LRSP
Agency Name: Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Project Template: Location #7
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Byron Rd - Berg Rd to Belconte Dr (Minor Arterial) Examples of Similar Segments: Beechnut Ave - Tracy Blvd to Sequoia Blvd, E 6th St - N MacArthur Dr to D St Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,845
Lighting No
Highest Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH
Collision Data
Total Collisions 7
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 1
Top Collision Types
(percentage)
Broadside (28.6%)
Rear-End (28.6%)
Sideswipe (14.3%)
Hit Object (14.3%)
Other (14.3%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 2
Wet Surface Collisions 0
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
5 0 0
Legend
Broadside
Rear-End
Sideswipe
Hit Object
*
* 1 collision had collision type listed as ‘Other’
and are not shown on this diagram
N

SEGMENT
Berg Rd
Additional Notes:
• Speeding observed - posted speed limit is 45 mph, observed higher speeds • Lacking continuous street lighting
• No bike lanes here
Byron Rd
Belconte Dr N
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety Related
B/C
All Install dynamic/variable
speed warning systems

0.70 (R26) $591,000 $16,000 36.94
Dark Add segment lighting 0.65
(R01) $312,480 $28,400 11.00
Bikes &
Pedestrians Add buffered bike lane 0.65
(R33PB) $886,500 $284,000 3.12
All Install median barrier 0.75
(R03) $492,500 $20,000 24.63
Project Name: Tracy LRSP
Agency Name: Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Case Study Sheet: Location #8
Project Location Description & Maps:

Intersection: Coral Hollow Rd & Lowell Ave (Signalized intersection) Examples of Similar Intersections: Coral Hollow Rd & Grant Line Rd, N Tracy Blvd & Grant Line Rd Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Number of Approaches 4
Total Entering Vehicles 26,101
Crosswalk Condition 3 Legs with Pedestrian
Timing
Control Type Signalized
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
Median Yes
Collision Data
Total Collisions 40
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 4
Top 2 Collision Types Rear-End (42.5%)
Sideswipe (22.5%)
Broadside (22.5%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 12
Wet Surface Collisions 5
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 1

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
35 1 3
Legend
Broadside
Head-On
Rear-End
Sideswipe
Hit Object
Vehicle-Pedestrian
Vehicle-Bicycle
*
5 2
2 4
2 2*
3 N
Lowell Ave
Coral Hollow
Additional Notes:
• Tire marks on south leg median, clipped by westbound lane movements • 3 bicycle invovled collisions
• Evidence that this intersection needs pavement upgrades N
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary Issues Potential Counter-
measures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
Bike & Pedestrian Install green paint in bicycle
lanes

0.65 (R32PB) $539,000 $15,000 35.93
All
Improve signal timing
(coordination, phasing, red,
yellow, operation)

0.85 (S03) $1,237,200 $8,000 154.65
Bike & Pedestrian Install High-Visibility
crosswalk

0.81 (4124) $292,600 $75,000 3.90
All Install retroreflective
backplates

0.85 (S02) $1,237,200 $12,000 103.10
Bike & Pedestrian Install advanced dilemma
zone detection

0.60 (S04) $3,299,200 $34,000 97.04
All Install raised medians
(refuge islands)

0.55 (NS19PB) $3,711,600 $25,000 148.46
Bike & Pedestrian
Modify signal phasing
to implement a Leading
Pedestrian Interval (LPI)

0.40 (S21PB) $4,948,800 $8,000 618.60
Bike & Pedestrian Pedestrian scramble during
school hours

0.60 (S19PB) $616,000 $120,000 5.13
Project Name: Tracy LRSP
Agency Name: Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Project Template: Location #3
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Lammers Rd - 11th St to Redbridge Rd (Collector) Examples of Similar Segments: S Lammers Rd - W Schulte Rd to Valpico Rd, W Schulte Rd - S Lammers Rd to Hansen Rd
Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 15,825
Lighting No
Highest Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
Collision Data
Total Collisions 7
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 1
Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Rear-End (42.9%)
Broadside (14.3%)
Hit Object (14.3%)
Head-On (14.3%)
Overturned (14.3%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 2
Wet Surface Collisions 1
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
5 0 0
*
Legend
Rear-End
Hit Object
*
N

SEGMENT
Additional Notes:
• Adjacent to high school
• Wide roadway and lanes
• High speeding
• During school release there are two outbound lanes from driveway Lammers Rd
N
o
Legend
Broadside
Head-On
Rear-End
Overturned
o
11th St
Redbrdige
Lammers Rd
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety Related
B/C
All Install dynamic/variable
speed warning systems

0.70 (R26) $509,880 $32,000 15.93
Bikes &
Pedestrians
Modify signal phasing
to implement a Leading
Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
at school signal

0.40 (S21PB) - $8,000 -
All Add safety edges 0.70
(R15) $509,880 $22,000 23.18
Project Name: Tracy LRSP
Agency Name: Tracy
Contact Name: Anju Pillai, P .E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimle y-Horn
Checked by: Darryl DePencier
Date: February 2022
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Project Template: Location #10
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Tracy Blvd - Schulte Rd to Menay Dr (Principal Arterial) Examples of Similar Segments: Sycamore Pkwy - W Schulte Rd to Amberwood Way, Coral Hollow Rd - W Schulte Rd to Golden Leaf Ln
Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,604
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH
Collision Data
Total Collisions 7
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
Fatal Injury - 0
Severe Injury - 0
Visible Injury - 0
Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Rear-End (14.3%)
Broadside (14.3%)
Hit Object (14.3%)
Total Nighttime Collisions 2
Wet Surface Collisions 1
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
3 1 0
*
o
Legend
Broadside
Rear-End
Sideswipe
Hit Object
Vehicle-Pedestrian
Overturned
*
o
* 1 collision had collision type listed as ‘Other’
and are not shown on this diagram
N

SEGMENT
Schulte Rd
Additional Notes:
• One pedestrian invovled crash
• Not a high priority location
Tracy Bl
Menay Dr
N
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs
Safety Related
B/C
All Install dynamic/variable
speed warning systems

0.70 (R26) $273,960 $32,000 8.56

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
________________________
CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

TRACY CIT

Y COUNCIL
RESOLU
TION 2023-_____

APPROVING THE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN AND SETTING A VISION ZERO FOR 2050
WHEREAS, City of Tracy has completed a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP), which establishes a framework to identify, analyze, and develop traffic safety enhancements on the C
ity’s transportation system; and
WHEREAS, the LRSP evaluates the transportation network as well as non-infrastructure programs and policies and identifies the vision to reduce the frequency of traffic fatalities and serious injury related crashes and outlined the goals to achieve i t and it was developed in accordance with the latest National and State best practices for statistical roadway analysis; and W
HEREAS, the LRSP stakeholders included members from Tracy Police Department, Tracy Unified School District, City of Tracy ADA Compliance Office, the San Joaquin County Fire Department, San Joaquin County Public Health Services, and the City of Tracy Transit Service Division; and
WHEREAS, existing plans, policies, and projects that were recently completed, planned, or are on-going within the City of Tracy were compiled, high-level key points regarding transportation improvements and safety-r elated topics were identified, and several data inputs were used in analysis, namely the r oadway network, intersection classification, traffic counts and
collision data for the period between January 1, 2015, and D ecember 31, 2019; and WHEREAS, the analysis of collision history on t he City’s transportation network allowed for opportunities to: 1) identify factors in the t ransportation network that inhibit safety for all roadway users, 2) improve safety at specific high-collision locations, and 3) develop safety measures using the 5E’s of transportation safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies, to encourage safe driver behavior, reduce the frequency and severity of crashes, and to institutionalize a process for monitoring safety and making safety investment decisions; and
WHEREAS, A special co ncurrent meeting of the Tr acy City Council and the Tracy Transportation Advisory Commission was held on February 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. in the City of Tracy’s Council
Chambers to present the LSRP and receive feedback from the community; and WHEREAS, Visi
on Zero is a global movement to end traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries
by taking a systemic approach to road safety and the premise of this strategy is that road deaths
and injuries are unacceptable and preventable; and
Resolution 2023-_____