05-20-2025 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TRINIDAD CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 20, 2025 (LIVE/HYBRID)
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kelly called the live-hybrid meeting to order at 6:00pm. Council members in attendance: Kelly, Kenny, Tuttle, Breckenridge, Varela. City Staff in attendance: City Manager Joe Tagliaboschi, City Clerk Gabriel Adams, Assistant Clerk Anton Souza, and City Planner Trever Parker. Approximately (3) participants were present by video-conference, and (10) were present live at the beginning of the meeting.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Motion (Breckenridge/Varela) to approve the agenda as submitted. Passed unanimously.
IV. ITEMS FROM THE FLOOR – No items presented
(Three (3) minute limit per Speaker unless Council approves request for extended time.) V. CONSENT AGENDA – None proposed
VI. DISCUSSION/ACTION AGENDA ITEMS
1. Trinidad Trail Closure Issues: Discussion/Action regarding future management of City Trails, particularly related to the Axel Lindgren Memorial Trail, Van Wycke Trail, and Galindo Trail. The discussion will focus on the approaching expiration of the temporary, permitted closure of the Axel Lindgren Memorial Trail and a phased reopening plan.
City Planner Trever Parker read from and summarized a comprehensive report included in the meeting packet.
She explained that trails and their repair and maintenance have been significant ongoing issues for several years. During this time, several trails have been temporarily closed, some for multiple years. Trail closures, and many maintenance activities require Coastal Development Permits (CDPs). Therefore, the Planning Commission has had primary responsibility for discussing and acting on the various closures and maintenance/repair proposals. A timeline of recent closure actions are listed below:
• Van Wycke
o August 2020, the PC approved a 6-month temporary closure that was appealed to the City Council (appeal denied) and the Coastal Commission
o September 2023, the Coastal Commission found the appeal raised no substantial issues, but made it clear they wanted a solution
o March 2024, the PC approved another 6-month closure
o September 2024, the PC denied an extension of the closure o October 2024, the City Council approved a 3-month extension of the closure o December 2024, City staff made some minor repairs (not requiring a CDP) and the closure expired. • Axel Lindgren Memorial Trail
o February 2023, City staff authorized an emergency CDP for closure at the request of the TAS o April 2023, the PC followed up to authorize a 6-month closure (2 months for Parker Creek Trail, which was reopened in May 2023)
o May 2023, the PC issued a CDP for repair of the Parker Creek Trail and remediation actions for erosion and impacts to cultural resources at the toe of the bluff along Old Home Beach o October 2023, the PC approved a 4-month extension on the condition that City staff develop a short-term reopening plan.
o March 2024, the PC approved another 4-month extension to the closure o July 2024, the Planning Commission denied a new CDP for continued temporary closure of the ALMT for up to a year (appealed to the City Council who upheld the appeal and overturned the PC decision, which was in turn appealed to the Coastal Commission who found the appeal raised no substantial issues).
o August 2024, the Planning Commission conditionally approved a CDP for vegetation removal along the realignment.
9 of 322
05-20-2025 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2
The Planning Commission has expressed growing frustration with the continued closures of trails in Trinidad, particularly in the face of public opposition to the closures. This frustration is exacerbated by the fact that the Planning Commission does not have any authority to direct staff or resources to address trail issues or to otherwise affect progress towards reopening the trails other than acting on CDPs. Although they recognize that staff have been doing what they can, the Planning Commission wants the City Council to take a more active role in directing resources and following through to ensure that solutions are being actively pursued. This includes agendizing trail issues at City Council meetings to provide the public with a forum to provide input to the Council and for the Council to provide clear direction to staff.
AXEL LINDGREN MEMORIAL TRAIL (ALMT)
Parker explained that the City has continued to work with the Tsurai Management Team (TMT) to look at both short and long-term repairs to the ALMT and ways to address the bluff instability. The current closure will expire on May 23. There was some discussion at the TMT about the possibility of opening a portion of the trail. The City requested a TMT meeting on 3/31 and 4/2, but did not receive any responses from Yurok Tribe or TAS representatives. However, more recent direction given to staff is to reopen the entire trail on the existing alignment as quickly as possible.
It has always been the City’s intent to reopen the trail as soon as safely and sensitively possible. This was what various parties agreed to when the City temporarily closed the trail in February 2023 at the request of TAS. The City took several follow-up actions in 2023 as requested by the TAS, including installing fencing at the top and bottom of the trail, placing jute matting along the toe of the bluff, and installing snow/sand fencing on the beach along the base of the bluff. The City has continued to meet with the TMT to work in good faith to reopen the trail along the traditional alignment as requested by the TAS. However, that process has taken longer than anticipated and now does not appear to present a viable option for reopening the trail in the short-term.
Therefore, the City plans to move forward with a phased approach that will reopen the trail in the existing, permitted alignment in the immediate short-term, and it will also commit the City to continuing to work on improving the ALMT to protect cultural resources, including moving forward with the realignment in both the long and intermediate terms.
The phased reopening plan consists of four basic steps: 1) immediately trim vegetation and install cable steps at the toe of the existing, permitted alignment, remove the fencing, and allow the temporary closure to expire; 2) replace existing steps as needed and work with the TMT to install fencing or a railing along the east side of the trail or portions of the trail to discourage people from leaving the trail; 3) work with the TMT to plan studies and improvements necessary to reroute the bottom of the trail to the traditional alignment; and 4) apply for grant funding to implement the long-term boardwalk plan developed by GHD and TAS.
As part of the initial phase, the City plans to process an amendment to the CDP/Design Review/Use Permit that was issued in 1996 to construct/improve the Hogback Trail for public use. This hearing is scheduled to occur at the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 2025. The proposed amendment will authorize ongoing maintenance and periodic repair of the trail consisting of vegetation trimming and placement of new cable steps at the base of the trail to replace the old cable steps that were washed away. The trail specifications and conditions of approval from the 1996 action will remain in effect.
It should be noted that the TAS object to the existing, permitted alignment of the trail. However, that alignment was properly permitted and constructed by and in coordination with the Yurok Tribe and Axel Lindgren II in 1997. The City intends to continue to work with the TAS/TMT to reroute the base of the trail. But since it has become apparent that cannot be accomplished in the short term, the City feels that reopening the trail in its current configuration best meets the City’s obligations to provide public access, meet the needs of the community, and to comply with the terms of the 1994 settlement agreement.
Council questions/comments included:
Varela: Trail closed due to safety concerns. What have been the barriers to reopening it? Kenny: I have a different view of our options tonight. The City’s Ordinance does not consider our reopening strategy to be “development”, and that we do not need a CDP to proceed. Parker noted the Coastal Commission staff believe the maintenance work needs a permit, due to the sensitive location adjacent to the shoreline.
10 of 322
05-20-2025 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3
Kelly: What is the CDP issuance timeline? Trever explained, a 2-week local appeal period, followed by a 10- working day appeal for the Coastal Commission.
Kenny: If someone appeals, we lose another summer without the trails open. We should apply our local coastal program interpretation to this project. Parker recommended against pursuing that option with the risk of getting a notice of violation.
Breckenridge: Asked for a description of the realignment, where there seems to be the point of contention.
Parker described that it was the bottom third of the trail where it currently veers towards the east, with the traditional route veered towards the west. The bluff retreat has made the traditional route infeasible. The Yurok Tribe chose the current route for ease of construction. The short-term, immediate opening would involve repairing the current route.
Kenny: The proposed realignment exits onto a large rock that has been impacted by erosion.
Kelly: I voted to close the trails after big storms and erosion two years ago, to mitigate safety and cultural sensitivities that occurred. Staff has been working diligently to evaluate different options. I want to preserve the longer-range plan but also do something in the short-term for the community.
Public comment included:
Steve Madrone – Fifth District County Supervisor
I built many of the trails in Trinidad over the last 40 years. Every trail (except Galindo) in the area has the same erosion problem at the toe of the slope. I propose a longer-term vision. There’s a lot of pressure along the shoreline. It’s the nature of the area. Crib steps last, but also require maintenance. There’s more than just the trail at stake below Edwards Street. The street itself is threatened by erosion, and also 80,000 gallons/day injected into the bluff by brining potable water to town . There’s city infrastructure at risk along with the Tsurai Village Site. If this was a European cemetery at risk, we might approach it differently. If you really want to stop the erosion by creating a stable transition from the trail to the beach, build a biotechnical revetment structure – including logs and willow, binding everything together. If not dealt with you’re looking at multi-million dollar projects down the road. Build biotechnical bank stabilization all the way from the west point of the beach, all the way past the Parker Creek Trail. I believe it’s possible to get permits for this. You could rebuild Groth Lane and bring 10 yard dump trucks, logs, excavators, and everything needed to stabilize the bluff. Build a toe trench and bury the midden with sand. Rip-rap fill the slope over 20ft high. In the near term the only solution is the cablesteps. I drew up a design that I’ll share with the City Manager, estimating the cost at 2-3 million dollars.
Kelly: Perhaps we can take this to the Tsurai Management Team and ask Madrone to help provide additional guidance. Madrone offered his services for free.
Jacque Hostler-Carmesin – Trinidad Rancheria Executive Director I appreciate the discussion tonight. On behalf of the Tribal Council and Chairman, we notice that Trinidad Rancheria has not been referenced in the staff report. We have repeatedly asked that the Rancheria be included in Tsurai Management Team meetings. We understand cultural sensitive discussions occur in executive sessions. It’s very concerning that after 14 years there no mention of the Trinidad Rancheria’s request to engage in trail opening or closing solutions. The Tribal Council is in favor of the proposed temporary repair. We have a lot of experience with coastal forces, erosion, and ongoing repair and maintenance. The Rancheria’s knowledge and descendance from the village should be considered. G2G consultation needs to happen. Respectfully request acknowledgement and inclusion in these solutions.
Allie Lindgren – Lineal Descendent of Tsurai
91 years old, born and raised in Trinidad. Trinidad is Tsurai. People have to change, speak slowly so everyone can understand what’s going on. Thanked the Council for holding this informative meeting.
Council comments included:
Kenny: Thanked Allie Lindgren for attended tonight.
Kelly: Summarized short-term and long-term strategies, and giving direction to the Planning Commission and Staff to move forward.
11 of 322
05-20-2025 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4
Breckenridge: I support the short-term, expeditious solution, and am intrigued by the long-term fix proposed by Madrone. Would like to hear more about that at some point in the future.
Varela: I feel that it’s important to acknowledge the resilience and strength of the indigenous people of this area and in this room, and the impact colonization has had on your communities. I joined the Council to be an advocate for a new way forward. Colonization has impacted the trajectory of native people’s lives, and reshaped the history of this space, allowing people like me to be here. We have a beautiful future together. I want to find an equitable path forward acknowledging and representing your experience, heritage, and history. I also want to acknowledge Jacque Hostler’s leadership of the Rancheria community. How are we going to share this history with locals and visitors. Sharing is priceless. It allows us to fall in love with this place. The focus tonight is trails. I’m in favor of adding cultural interpretive information along all our trails to share this history.
Kenny: Question about the exclusion orders, and exemptions. I think we have a pretty good case for saying we don’t need a permit. If the Coastal Commission wants to give us a cease and desist letter, we’ll address it then.
I worry about someone filing an appeal and risking the trail be closed for yet another summer. My preference would be to make a finding that the repair does not need a permit. It’s the season to get people down to the beach. Parker noted that they require 2/3rd of the Coastal Commission vote to adopt, with more rigorous review. Exclusion order will take precedence over local actions.
Kelly: I understand the need to expedite. However, the process for people to appeal gives an opportunity for more input – it’s part of the process. I believe they can be resolved quickly since we have consulted with the Coastal Commission. Kenny noted it would take at least 4-5 months.
City Manager Tagliaboschi explained that the City Attorney and Planner guidance is consistent.
Kenny: My fall-back position is to get the CDP but proceed anyway if someone appeals the project. We reserve the right to do that.
Kelly: I don’t want to lose the summer either, but I may not be comfortable saying “too bad, we’re building it anyway”. Let’s make a motion and vote to see what the Council thinks. Varela agreed.
Continued public comment:
Jacque Hostler-Carmesin – Trinidad Rancheria Executive Director Harbor asked the Coastal Commission to do maintenance, asking for an exemption, and received a favorable response. It has to do with the manner in which work will be performed. What I’m hearing is there is no intent for ground disturbance. The City may want to write a formal letter to the Coastal Commission requesting a waiver. It won’t hurt.
City Planner Parker noted that the temporary closre CDP will expire on Friday, and we cannot guarantee zero ground disturbance. The cables steps may be considered a new structure. The Coastal Commission has a waiver procedure, but the City’s LCP does not. We could move forward with the permit, and send a letter.
Steve Madrone – County Supervisor
Not doing something could create a safety issue since people may likely use the trail anyway – regardless of signage. It happens all the time. You also have tremendous experience and resources with the Trinidad Coastal Land Trust. It is not a no ground disturbance project.
Continued Council comment:
Kenny: We need to show backbone and be brave, and can back down if necessary. This is our City, and our ordinances.
Motion (Kenny) to move forward with a CDP for the short-term repair, with the caveat that the City reserves the right to continue with the project without a permit, and the City will continue if the project is appealed. Motion fails due to lack of second.
Kenny, continued: The long-term phase of the proposed project plan is inappropriate. There’s not enough return for the investment. We need to give the land back to a Tribal entity and let them decide how to manage 12 of 322
05-20-2025 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5
the land. The Yurok Tribe should get first right of refusal. The City needs to get out of this situation. To honor Trinidad’s splendor and beauty, trails should have the least amount of engineering as possible.
Kelly: We need to stay focused on the trail proposal/repair tonight. The City should work with the Tsurai, Yurok, and Rancheria to pursue funding to redirect the trail as the Tsurai has requested.
Motion (Kelly/Tuttle) to approve the ALMT phased reopening plan, direct staff to continue implementing it with necessary CDP, writing a formal letter requesting exemption, and to continue working with Tribal entities to develop a joint-funding proposal whereby the trail can be redirected in the traditional, preferred pathway.
Passed unanimously.
GALINDO TRAIL
City Planner Parker explained that Galindo Street can be seen on aerial photos dating back at least to the 1960’s, and it is included in Trinidad’s original 1980 LCP (Plate 4 and Policy 64). It was reconstructed in 1992 as a “repair and maintenance” project. Although the TAS assert that the City agreed to close the trail in 2001 as part of the “Walkway Project,” which resulted in construction of the boardwalk along lower Edwards, and again as part of the development of the TMP, there is no evidence or support of that claim in the file record. If such an agreement was made, it was not done in a public forum. I only mention this because it is likely to come up at the meeting. I don’t think the question can be easily resolved, but it appears to be a moot point, since the City has publicly agreed to pursue closure of the trail now.
The current trail closure discussion first arose in November 2017, when the TAS presented a petition (https://www.change.org/p/trinidad-city-council-close-galindo-street-trail-in-trinidad-ca) to close the Galindo Trail as an “item from the floor” at the City Council meeting. The stated reason is because the trail passes over or near to Tsurai gravesite(s). Although the Council could not take action on an item not on the agenda, they indicated an interest in following up on the issue. Staff researched the files, and the City Council held a Government-to-Government (G2G) meeting with the Yurok Tribe in February 2018. There was also an onsite meeting around the same time with representatives from TAS, the Yurok Tribe, Trinidad Rancheria, the City Manager only, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. At that meeting, it was reported that there was a general consensus that the trail should be closed.
City staff then met with Coastal Commission staff in March 2018 to discuss the process for closure of the trail.
Coastal Commission staff did not support trail closure at that time and suggested that an LCP amendment would be required and that detailed analysis and justification to close the trail would be necessary. In addition, they suggested that some type of pedestrian pathway between the bottom of Edwards Street and the bottom of the Galindo Trail would be required in order to provide alternative access in the “same time, place, and manner” pursuant to their interpretation of Coastal Act § 30214. Coastal Commission staff additionally suggested that prescriptive rights could interfere with closing the trail. Therefore, little progress was made due to these significant hurdles.
The issue came up again in 2020, and the City Council officially directed staff to work on a proposal for closing the Galindo Trail at their August 11, 2020 meeting. (Motion to direct City staff to work with Coastal Commission staff and stakeholders to put together a proposal to close the Galindo Trail, which will eventually become an application for a CDP and LCP Amendment. Passed 4-1.) Note that in the minutes for that meeting, there are several comments from then current and former Councilmembers that they had already voted to close the trail.
However, I cannot find a record of it being on a previous City Council agenda, and my best guess is that they were referring to the G2G meeting with the Yurok Tribe in February 2018, the results of which I cannot find any details of in the record.
However, progress towards trail closure was not made until 2022 due to the previously mentioned challenges presented by Coastal Commission staff, because City staff did not have the information and resources to address them. That changed in 2022 with a change of leadership at the local CCC office and likely as the result of new executive and legislative directives requiring state agencies to more comprehensively consider environmental justice and tribal consultation/issues. The TAS met with Coastal Commission staff directly in July 2022. And City staff met with the TAS and Coastal Commission staff in August 2022, where Coastal Commission staff agreed that the trail should be closed and provided suggestions for an achievable path forward.
13 of 322
05-20-2025 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6
City staff continued to meet and work closely with the TAS and Coastal Commission staff into early 2023 to plan a small parklet that would serve as a memorial and an overlook at the top of the bluff along the trail with closure and restoration of the lower portion of the trail. The conceptual plan is attached. The City was also working on coordinating repair of the boardwalk along lower Edwards at that time, which provides a critical alternative pedestrian access route. City staff were planning on presenting the plan to the City Council and the public at the February 2023 meeting. Unfortunately, we all got pulled away to deal with the erosion along Old Home Beach instead. And staff have continued to be busy with trails other issues so that we have not gotten back to working on Galindo. In addition, there have been delays with the easement for the boardwalk repair, which may impact the ability to move forward with the closure anyway.
Council comments/questions included:
Varela: Does the Tsurai Ancestral Society still want the trail closed? Kenny: Against the closure. Tuttle agreed.
Public comment included:
Aaron Hakenen – Trinidad
I’m up here as a resident – not as a Planning Commissioner. Question, if closure is a decision will the lower bench and vista be kept onsite? It’s a wonderful view of the Harbor.
Jack West – Trinidad
Former Councilmember. I was likely in the last meeting held with the Yurok Tribe. We need to follow through with things promised in the past, requested by the Yurok and Tsurai.
Jacque Hostler-Carmesin – Trinidad Rancheria Executive Director I attended the meeting Parker referenced with the BIA and Tribal Archeologists. The concern was protecting possible gravesites on the trail. It was a very serious meeting. The recommendation of the BIA Archeologist was that you can’t answer the question about the location of the grave. You can’t examine it. All you can do is protect the grave. Keeping the trail open doesn’t protect the grave. During that meeting, there was consensus that the trail should be closed. It is important to use caution with statements regarding the outcome of the Tsurai Village transfer/ownership, etc. It’s inappropriate to make statements about the disposition of the Village when it is not properly noticed on the agenda. There is current litigation that these opinions should be held for.
Steve Madrone – Trinidad Area Resident
Myself and team at RCAA and Conservation Corps built this trail with Axel Lindgren III monitoring. The trail is convenient and scenic. Late in the process of building the steps, Lindgren left for a doctor’s appointment and when he returned, he pointed out that the steps were constructed near the grave. We need to let go of our personal feelings and think about a trail through a cemetery, it’s inappropriate. I will help volunteer to remove the trail. A believe there was recognition and agreement to close this trail. This is a step forward to heal.
Tristan Cole – Trinidad
The Galindo Street Trail is the only deed public access to reach Launcher Beach. There is no deeded access via pavement.
Jacque Hostler-Carmesin – Trinidad Rancheria Executive Director The Rancheria memorialized the easement that is there during the BIA Trust process. Access to the Pier is also protected by easement. Closing the trail does not mean revoking the easement.
Council comments included:
Breckenridge: Do we know where the graves are? To promise closure but not deliver seems harmful to our relationships.
Tuttle: It is unfortunate that the Van Wycke trail was closed and now we’re talking about closing another trail. I would be ok closing this trail if Van Wycke was open. Concerned with the public being upset with us for this.
Van Wycke is technically open, but very difficult to use.
Kenny: Who was representing the public’s interest during those internal meetings? I understand a good argument can be made that the whole country is a huge injustice to the native people. It’s wrong to close this 14 of 322
05-20-2025 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 7
trail, used by everyone. Two wrongs don’t make one right. This is the only public access linking to the easement. The Pier easement runs out in 2032. This is an important link for the public’s access to the Pier. I doubt this was considered when trail closure was discussed. The boardwalk to the Harbor is on Rancheria property, and in the summer dumps people off on a busy intersection. Galindo Trail exists in a quiet section of the Harbor. The boardwalk is not a great substitute. Galindo is also the quickest way to get to high-ground during a tsunami. When I walk by and think of someone buried there, I feel a connection to tribal interests.
They may be glad see people walking by, thinking about them. I don’t think there’s anything disrespectful about that. People keep an eye on that area. The top of the trail can be relocated to a less sensitive area, but trail closure is not necessary.
Kelly: I served on the Trail Committee and Planning Commission. I run trails, and voted to fix Van Wycke. I’m pro-trail. However, I anchor my decisions to integrity. This Council has discussed with all three tribal entities closing this trail. On August 11, 2020, the Council directed staff to develop a plan to close Galindo - due to gravesites, information received, and consultations. I don’t see why the Rancheria would restrict access to their business enterprises. I want to stand by to previous Council commitments, keep our word and close Galindo.
Motion (Bryce/Tuttle) to reaffirm Council commitment to keep Galindo Trail open. Motion failed 2-Yes, 3-No.
Motion (Kelly) to direct staff to continue building the process to evaluate the closure of the Galindo Trail, work with Tribal entities to confirm this position. No vote taken.
Varela: I recognize historic meetings have been held, but it feels important to have one more G2G meeting, or have further conversation to make sure this issue is relevant. It could be done with Van Wycke Trail access back on the table for discussion.
Final public comment:
Jacque Hostler-Carmesin – Trinidad Rancheria Executive Director It would be great to accomplish cultural site protection and find a solution for the Van Wycke Trail. The meeting occurred 7 years ago, and agree with Varela that reaffirming positions is a good idea.
Steve Madrone – Trinidad Area Resident
Don’t make one trail closure contingent upon another opening.
Staff will take guidance from tonight’s meeting, communicate and reaffirm Tribal entities positions, and return to the Council with information gathered.
VAN WYCKE TRAIL
City Planner Trever Parker explained that as of May 15, 2025, the CIRA’s Board (the City’s insurance provider) voted to remove the exclusion on the Van Wycke Trail, so it now has liability insurance coverage again.
Although the immediate issue of the temporary closure has been solved for the short-term, the future of this trail is still in question. The slide that is impacting the trail will continue to move, further compromising the condition of the trail. As previously noted, the City will need to decide whether to pursue repairs and to what extent, and consider if/when the trail should be closed as has been requested by the Tsurai Ancestral Society and Yurok Tribe. Staff recommends that the City Council request formal consultation with the Yurok Tribe to better understand the potential impacts to cultural resources from the use of the trail in order to inform the Council’s decision.
Public comment included:
Roland Johnson – Trinidad Area
Doesn’t want the Council to give up on Van Wycke. Recollected driving a jeep on Van Wycke growing up in Trinidad. It should be kept open.
No decision was made.
15 of 322
05-20-2025 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 8
2. Discussion/Decision to Appoint two (2) Councilmembers to the Tsurai Management Team.
City Manager Tagliaboschi explained that it was appropriate to bring back the appointments made back in January when new Councilmembers were seated, to confirm Breckenridge and Varela wish to continue serving in this capacity.
Varela expressed interest in continuing. Breckenridge would give up the seat due to inconsistent scheduling that may interfere with her work schedule.
There was no public comment.
Motion (Kelly/Tuttle) to nominate Kenny to replace Breckenridge on the TMT. Passed unanimously.
Continued public comment included:
Jacque Hostler-Carmesin – Trinidad Rancheria Executive Director Concerned with being prevented from participating in Tsurai Management Team meetings.
Motion (Kenny/Tuttle) based on its position relative to Policy 69 of the City and the 12.5 acre Study Area, to invite the Trinidad Rancheria to become a member of the Tsurai Management Team. Passed unanimously.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
- Old Home Beach slope reinforcement concept (ALMT phased plan) - Underground Utility District
- Playground at Saunders Park.
ADJOURNMENT: 8:35pm.
Submitted by: Approved by:
_____________________________ _____________________________ Gabriel Adams Cheryl Kelly
Trinidad City Clerk Mayor
16 of 322