Tulare City Council
December 16, 2025

as a holiday. If any of the foregoing holidays fall on an employee's normal day off, except Saturday or Sunday, they shall be credited to vacation.

2. Fire Shift Personnel
In return for the elimination of the holiday time off (as stated above in Section XV.J.1) Fire shift personnel shall receive thirteen days (104 hours times 1.4 multiplier or 145.6 hours) of annual holiday time. In lieu of taking off eight (89.6 hours) of the thirteen days granted in holidays, each sworn fire shift personnel shall be paid for the eight days 44.8 hours the first paycheck in June and

44.8 hours the first paycheck in December. The remaining 56 hours (divided by 26 pay periods) shall be added to the employee’s annual vacation leave bank.

3. Paid Days in Lieu of Holidays at Termination
Regular employees of the Fire Departments leaving municipal service with accrued pay days in lieu of holidays who give at least two weeks of notice of their intention to terminate shall be paid the amount of accrued days in lieu of holidays to the day of termination. Payment for accrued days in lieu of holidays shall be at the employee's current rate of pay. (Amended by Resolution 2582) K. Compensation for Work on Paid Holidays
Non-shift fire personnel and non-shift probationary employees assigned to work on holidays shall receive compensatory time off or overtime as recommended by the Department Head subject to the approval of the City Manager. All requests for overtime pay in lieu of compensatory time off shall be made by memorandum to the Fire Chief.

L. Compensation During Attendance of a Training Course During Vacation, Holidays, or Time Off
City employees should feel free to attend training courses that are available during their vacation, holidays or days off if they so desire, however, compensation for attendance for training courses held during days off, weekends, vacations or holidays will be authorized only where employees have been directed by the Department Head to attend such on the following basis:

1. Holidays
Employees directed to attend training courses will be compensated as provided in Article XV.K. above.

2. Vacations
Employees directed to attend training courses held during their vacation days will be allowed to reschedule their vacation days.

3. Days Off or Off Duty Shifts
Employees directed to attend training courses on their days off or off duty shifts will be compensated as provided in Article XV.F above. Whenever an employee is out of the City for a number of days on a training course, such as one week seminars, etc., the regular working schedule has no relationship to working hours while in school or in seminars and no special compensation other than regular pay and attendance expenses will be authorized. Under unusual circumstances, deviation from the foregoing procedure may be warranted by Department Heads, however, only after receiving approval from the City Manager.

M. Management Leave
Battalion Chiefs shall receive management leave as follows:

1. Less Than Five (5) Years of Service
Twenty-four (24) hours management leave (33.6 hours for twenty-four hour shift personnel) per fiscal year.

2. Five (5) or More Years of Service
Thirty-two (32) hours of management leave (44.8 hours for twenty-four hour shift personnel) per fiscal year.

3. Accrual
Leave will be divided by 26 pay periods and be accrued as part of Annual Leave.

N. Various Certification, Education, and Assignment Incentives Employees shall be entitled to receive these pays in the amounts set forth below, commencing with the first pay period following documentation of the award being turned into the Human Resources Department. Documentation shall be considered the award or conferral by community college or university transcripts (public or private recognized and accredited post-secondary educational institution) or documentation by the California State Fire Marshall (CSFM) or other appropriate state or national training or accreditation agency. The City finds that the below degrees and certifications enhance employees’ ability to perform their job duties.

1. Certification Incentive Pay Program
Employees shall be provided with certification incentive pay as a percentage of their base pay for possession of the following professional certifications, up to a maximum of 7.5%. 5% for CSFM Chief Fire Officer or Chief Officer*

7.5% for CSFM or NFA Executive Fire Officer*
* or equivalent as determined by the Fire Chief and Human Resources Director

2. Education Incentive Pay Program
Employees shall be provided with education incentive pay as a percentage of their base pay for possession of the following degrees, up to a maximum of 7.5%. 5% for a Bachelor’s Degree (with 20 units in Fire Science related field)

7.5% for a Master’s Degree

3. Fire Investigator & Lead Fire Investigator
Employees shall be eligible for a 5% specialty salary incentive pay for the position of Lead Fire Investigator. Employees seeking this incentive pay shall comply with Lexipol Policies 402, 403, and 404. Employees shall maintain current status in the Fire Investigation Unit to be eligible for this Incentive pay. Assignment to the Fire Investigation Unit shall be at the discretion of the Fire Chief.

Employees in the Fire Investigation Unit shall receive two hours of straight time for everyday on "stand-by" when off-duty and not called to investigate an incident.

4. Paramedic Incentive Pay
Employees with paramedic certification shall be eligible for a specialty salary incentive pay of five percent (5.0%) of base pay at the discretion of and with approval from the Fire Chief.

5. Tuition Reimbursement
Regular City employees are eligible to receive tuition reimbursement for educational purposes which tend to improve their ability to accomplish their City jobs, such reimbursement shall be subject to administrative rules and procedures established by the Human Resources Division Effective July 1, 2010, tuition reimbursement will be capped at a maximum of two thousand five hundred ($2,500) dollars per fiscal year per employee. This amount may be used to attend fire, EMS and other approved job-related courses. Travel and training at the National Fire Academy will be excluded from tuition reimbursement and the City will pay the cost of meals and cover an employee’s time off for this training only. The City will arrange for the time off of an employee attending the NFA, any grant funded training, or any training that is mandatory by the Fire Chief. Unless otherwise provided above, courses which require overnight travel will not be included in this MOU and will be approved based on the City’s Overnight Travel and Training requirements. An employee must make his or her own arrangements for time off during any other training covered by this section.

6. EMS Re-Certification
The City agrees that it will be responsible for the cost of EMS re-certification; all training shall be done on the employees’ own time.

O. Sick Leave Compensation

1. Upon Retirement
An employee having a minimum of ten (10) years of regular service with the City shall be allowed the option of cashing out up to thirty (30) days (336 hours) and then placing all other time into an “account” with the City. Funds in the account shall be used to pay retiree health insurance premiums with the City. Upon retirement the City shall enter into an agreement with the said retiree showing the balance in the account. While there is money remaining in the account the City shall send a statement to the retiree each July showing the account balance and interest earned on the account. Interest shall be calculated based on the average 12 months (July through June) with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). Sick leave shall be converted from time into a monetary amount at the retiree’s last hourly rate of pay. Any funds not used in the account due to the retiree deciding to not stay on City health insurance shall cancel out and have no cash value.

Employee’s choosing not to elect City retiree health insurance can cash out up to sixty (60) days (672 hours). Any balance not cashed out shall be reported to PERS in equivalent days toward service credit.

P. Compensation for Fractions of Hours Worked
Fractions of hours worked shall be compensated as follows:
0 - 7.5 minutes no payment

7.5 - 22.5 minutes 0.25 hour

22.5 - 37.5 minutes 0.50 hour

37.5 - 52.5 minutes 0.75 hour

52.5 - 60.0 minutes 1.00 hour
Q. Retirement Compensation

1. CalPERS Retirement System
All regular and regular part time employees are members of the Public Employees Retirement System, subject to enrollment criteria. The employees and the City shall be subject to changes in the exact contributions and benefits, as determined by the system. The actual terms of retirement benefits for miscellaneous members and local safety members shall be determined by retirement system contracts. (amended by Resolution 3740)

2. CalPERS Optional Benefits
The City has contracted with PERS for optional benefits. The coverage key reflects the following changes:

Optional Benefit Misc Fire Police

8.1 1 year final comp 12-14-1991 12-14-1991 12-14-1991

8.3 Sick leave credit 12-14-1991 12-14-1991 12-14-1991

8.4 1959 Survivor 03-21-1975 03-21-1975 03-21-1975

8.6 Military Sr Credit 76 06-30-1997 No no

8.21 2%@55 Ret formula no 12-08-1984 12-08-1984

8.22 Inc 59 Survivor 07-04-1980 07-03-1980 07-03-1980

8.40 3%@55 Ret formula no 01-01-2002 01-01-2002

8.44 2%@55 Ret formula 06-30-1997 No no

8.48 4th lvl 1959 surv ben 11-06-1998 01-01-02 08-01-95

2.7%@55 Ret formula 07-01-06 No no
3%@50 Ret formula no 01-01-07 01-01-07

2.5%@55 Ret formula (new
employees hired on or after
effective date)
07-03-10 No no
3%@55 Ret formula (new
employees hired on or after
effective date)
no 07-03-10 no

1. Employee Share to Public Employee Retirement System
Classic bargaining unit employees pay nine percent (9%) of the employee’s contribution to the Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS). PEPRA bargaining unit employees of the Group (employees hired on or after January 1, 2013) shall pay fifty percent (50%) of the normal cost as determined by CalPERS for the 2.7% at 57 plan. Effective with the first pay period in January of 2018, employees in the Group began picking up three percent (3%) of the City’s share of CalPERS, for Classic and PEPRA members.

2. PERS Survivor Benefit
Management Fire Personnel: The City shall maintain the PERS Survivor benefit at level IV.

The Fire Department Sworn positions are part of a pooled group and receive the preretirement option 2W death benefit by being in the pool.

R. Bilingual Pay
Sworn public safety personnel shall receive an incentive pay of two per cent (2.0%) for bilingual certification in accordance with City policy. A re-certification shall occur every 3 years. An employee not passing the re-certification shall not continue to receive the incentive pay.

S. Deferred Compensation

1. Offering
All regular employees may, at the employee's request, be included in a Deferred Compensation Plan whereby the employee may provide for the deferral of a specified amount of current income to be invested and the payment of such deferred amount and interest thereon to be made at a later date. Said Deferred Compensation Plan shall be subject to approval by the Internal Revenue Service. Implementation of the plan shall involve no cost or charge to the City.

2. Matching Program
Effective the first full pay period of July 2026, the City shall contribute up to fifty dollars ($50.00) per pay period to the employee’s deferred compensation account with a required match. City will provide the contribution to an established 457 Deferred Compensation provider to each employee as determined by the City upon 1) Completion of probation and 2) All enrollment forms completed by the employee. If an employee opts out of this benefit, or fails to complete the enrollment forms, the City will not be obligated to provide this benefit.

T. Uniform Allowance

1. Regular Employees of the Fire Department
Regular Sworn Fire personnel required to wear uniforms in the performance of their duties shall receive a uniform allowance of $1,300 per year. New employees of the Fire Department shall receive, upon initial employment, two pairs of pants, two shirts, one work jacket, one dress jacket and one complete set of Class-A uniform. Any new or reappointed employee whose appointment begins prior to January 1 of any year shall be granted the allotment for uniform maintenance. If appointed or reappointed after January 1, employee shall be granted uniform allowance the following year.

2. Additional Uniforms and Uniform Allowance Procedures Any additional uniforms needed shall be supplied at the employee's expense. The City Manager shall establish such regulations and procedures needed for the administration of the uniform allowance procedure.

U. Minimum Staffing
The parties agree to meet and confer to discuss changes to Policy 208 – Minimum Staffing Levels

XVI. ANNUAL VACATION LEAVE
A. Purpose
The purpose of annual vacation leave is to allow employees time to both mentally and physically refresh to successfully carry out the duties of their position. To achieve this goal, it is the intention of the City to have the employee schedule a vacation for periods of at least one week.

B. Eligibility
All regular, regular part time, probationary, and temporary employees, upon the completion of six months of continuous service, shall be eligible for vacation leave. The amount of time available for an employee's vacation shall be accumulated through the month immediately preceding the month in which the employee's vacation falls.

C. Accrual

1. Process
Vacation leave shall be accrued and credited monthly by all eligible employees who are on pay status for 50 per cent or more of that month. Those employees eligible for vacation as defined in XVI (B) shall accrue vacation at the following rates:

2. Annual Vacation Leave Accrual for Management Fire Shift Personnel All employees with less than four (4) complete years of service shall earn leave at the rate of 136 working hours per year. Upon the completion of five (5) continuous years of service, the employee shall earn 147.2 working hours of vacation per year; in the same manner, 158.4 hours shall be earned for the sixth year; 169.6 hours shall be earned for the seventh year; 180.8 hours shall be earned for the eighth year; 192 hours for the ninth year; 248 hours for the fifteenth year; for a maximum of 248 hours per year thereafter.

D. Accumulation
Employees may accumulate up to 530 hours which includes vacation, holidays and management leave. If vacation is denied due to a City related emergency, such vacation may be carried over into the following year, if necessary.

E. Scheduling
An employee's vacation shall be, as much as possible, scheduled for the employee's convenience, however, vacation shall be approved by the Fire Chief so as not to interfere seriously with or impair departmental efficiency. Employees will be allowed to schedule two vacation picks before the beginning of the year. These vacation selections are guaranteed. Employees will be allowed to take additional vacation at any time as long as approved by the Fire Chief.

F. Working During Annual Vacation Leave
The City shall discourage any employee from working for another employer during vacation. At no time will an employee be permitted to work for the City during vacation and receive double compensation.

G. Holidays Within Vacation Leave
For non-shift personnel, when a recognized City holiday falls within an employee's vacation for which employee normally would have been excused from work, that day shall not be charged as a day of annual vacation.

H. Illness Within Vacation Leave
If an employee becomes ill or injured during vacation leave which requires hospitalization or medical attention, those days for which proof of such hospitalization or medical attention is furnished shall not be charged as annual vacation but shall be charged as sick leave.

I. Payment Upon Termination
Employees who terminate employment shall be paid for any accrued vacation. Payment for accrued vacation upon termination shall be at the employee's current rate of pay.

J. Effect of Extended Military Leave
An employee whose City service is interrupted due to an extended military commitment shall be compensated for accrued vacation leave upon separation from City service.

XVII. SICK LEAVE
A. Statement of Policy
Sick leave shall not be considered as a privilege which an employee may use at their discretion, but shall be granted only upon the recommendation of the Department Head. Sick leave shall be allowed only in case of necessity and actual personal illness or disability, medical or dental treatment. Sick leave shall be allowed to a maximum of six days (6) per year (69.2 hours per year for twenty-four hour shift personnel) in case of emergency illness in the immediate family. Upon the approval of the City Manager, additional days may be authorized.

The immediate family shall be the spouse, parent, child, step child, brother, sister or other close family member as approved by the Human Resources Director. (amended by Resolution 3740) B. Eligibility for Sick Leave
All regular, regular part-time, probationary, and temporary employees, upon completion of six months continuous service, shall be eligible for sick leave with pay.

C. ACCRUAL OF SICK LEAVE

1. Sick Leave Accrual for Twenty-Four (24) Hour Shift Personnel Sick leave shall be accrued and credited monthly at the rate of 11.2 hours by all eligible employees who are on a pay status for 50 per cent or more of that month. Those employees eligible for sick leave, as defined in XVII (B), shall accrue sick leave at a rate proportionately equal to that of regular employees.

2. Sick Leave Accrual for Non-Twenty-Four (24) Hour Shift Personnel Sick leave shall be accrued and credited monthly by all eligible employees who are on a pay status for 50 percent or more of that month. Those employees eligible for sick leave, as defined in XVII, shall accrue sick leave at the rate of eight (8) hours per month.

D. Accumulation of Sick Leave for Twenty-Four Hour Shift Personnel There is no cap on sick leave accumulation for twenty-four hour shift personnel.

E. HOLIDAYS WITHIN SICKLEAVE
When a recognized City holiday falls within an employee's bona fide use of sick leave for which employee normally would have been excused from work, that day shall not be charged as a day of sick leave.

F. Usage of Sick Leave
Sick leave may be used as needed and approved, to the point of depletion, at which time the employee will no longer receive pay for sick leave.

G. Deduction of Sick Leave
Sick leave shall be deducted at the rate of one hour sick leave for each hour absent.

H. Verification of Sick Leave Usage
The City reserves the following rights with regard to control and verification of appropriate sick leave usage:
• The City may require that any employee who uses more than two (2) consecutive days of sick leave to provide a physician's certification of the employee's illness. • The City may formally place an employee on "sick leave restriction" whereupon, for a period of time, the employee may subsequently be required to provide the City a physician's certification of illness for each incidence of sick leave usage, regardless of the amount of time off work.

• In determining whether or not to place an employee on "sick leave restriction", the City agrees to consider not only gross usage and so-called "patterns of usage", but also extended illness, major medical problems and incidents of family sick leave.

I. Sick Leave Compensation Upon Termination
There is no cash value to sick leave other than what is listed under “sick leave compensation upon retirement”.

J. Sick Leave Compensation Upon Retirement
An employee having a minimum of ten (10) years of regular service with the City shall be allowed the option of cashing out up to thirty (30) days (336 hours) and then placing all other time into an “account” with the City. Funds in the account shall be used to pay retiree health insurance premiums with the City. Upon retirement the City shall enter into an agreement with the said retiree showing the balance in the account. While there is money remaining in the account the City shall send a statement to the retiree each July showing the account balance and interest earned on the account. Interest shall be calculated based on the average 12 months (July through June) with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). Sick leave shall be converted from time into a monetary amount at the retiree’s last hourly rate of pay. Any funds not used in the account due to the retiree deciding to not stay on City health insurance shall cancel out and have no cash value.

Employee’s choosing not to elect City retiree health insurance can cash out up to sixty (60) days (672 hours). Any balance not cashed out shall be reported to PERS in equivalent days toward service credit.

K. Workers’ Compensation
• An employee of the Fire Department who is entitled to the benefits of Labor Code Section 4850, who is absent from work by reason of an injury or illness covered by workers compensation, shall be allowed up to one year's leave of absence, as required by said section. The employee shall continue to receive a regular paycheck as long as employee remains on pay status; provided, however, that such employee assigns to the City any and all workers compensation payments received by the employee. • An employee of the Fire Department who is absent from work by reason of an injury or illness covered by workers compensation will continue to accrue sick leave, vacation and holiday benefits and consideration for normal salary increases as though employee were not on leave of absence. (amended by Resolution 3091)
• Whenever such disability of an employee continues for a period beyond one year, the leave of absence may continue until the expiration of the employee’s accrued sick leave, vacation and previously accrued compensatory time off for overtime and paid days in lieu of holidays, calculated to the nearest one-half day, with compensation at the employee's regular rate of pay.
• When it appears the employee cannot return to work by the expiration of such allowances, disability retirement shall be requested by the City to become effective at the expiration of these allowance unless the employee applies for or consents to retirement as of an earlier

date, at which time the employee may be compensated for accrued benefits at the employee’s regular rate of pay.
• No employee of the Fire Department shall be paid any disability indemnity under workers compensation concurrently with wages or salary payments by the City amounting to more than the employee’s regular rate of pay at any time during a leave of absence. • No employee of the Fire Department shall receive wage or salary payments from the City after a period of five years from the date of injury for any one injury. • The City and TFCO have entered into a “Carve Out Program” pursuant to Labor Code section 3201.7.

L. Depletion of Sick Leave, Compensatory Time Off, and Vacation Benefits Upon depletion of accumulated sick leave, compensatory time and vacation for any injury or illness and upon the recommendation of the employee's Department Head, an employee may be placed on medical leave of absence without pay for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days. If the employee is unable to return to work at the end of this period, he/she must request further medical leave which shall be subject to approval of the City Manager. If further leave is granted, the employee must notify the City of their intent to return to work every thirty (30) days. If further leave is not granted, the employee's service with the City shall be considered terminated.

M. Employee Rehabilitation
The City shall provide a rehabilitation program for industrially injured employees, pursuant to Section 139.5 of the California Labor Code. Employees unable to return to their previous position shall be interviewed for an available position, if said employee submits a timely application and meets the minimum qualifications for such position. The above procedures applies for eighteen (18) months. The employee's name shall be placed on a mailing list for the period designated above.

XVIII. OTHER LEAVES OF ABSENCE
A. Leave of Absence Without Pay
Leave of absence without pay may be granted in cases of emergency of where such absence would not be contrary to the best interests of the City. Such leave is not a right but a privilege. Employees on authorized leave of absence without pay may not extend such leave without the expressed approval of the City Manager. No vacation or sick leave benefits shall be used for illness occurring during such leave.

1. Approval of Department Head
Leave of absence without pay for one week or less may be granted by the Department Head, depending on the merits of the individual case. Such leaves shall be reported to the Personnel Officer.

2. Approval of City Manager
Leave of absence without pay in excess of one week's duration may be granted by the City Manager on the merits of the case, but such leave shall not exceed twelve months' duration.

B. Absence Without Leave
Absence without leave shall be considered to be without pay and reduction in the employee's pay shall be made accordingly. Absence without leave for more than three consecutive days may result in termination of employment.

C. Leave of Absence: Death Outside the Immediate Family Leave without pay may be granted by Department Heads in the event of a death of family members beyond the employee’s immediate family. Such leave to be granted in accordance with XVIII(I).

D. Maternity
Leave of absence for maternity will be covered under the provisions authorized in XVII (A) and (G). An employee may work until she has been advised by her doctor to cease working. The employee may continue on sick leave either until the doctor gives written permission to return to work or until benefits are exhausted. (SEC. 1604.10, Chapter XIV, Part 1604, Title 29, United States Labor Code)
E. Time Off to Vote
Time off with pay to vote at any general, special, direct primary or Presidential primary election shall be granted as provided in the State of California Elections Code, and notice that an employee desires such time off shall be given in accordance with the provisions of said code.

F. Jury Duty: Leave of Absence
Employees required to report for jury duty shall be granted a leave of absence with pay from their assigned duties until released by the court, provided the employee remits to the City all fees received for such duties, other than mileage or subsistence allowance, within thirty (30) days from completion of jury service.

G. Subpoenas: Leave of Absence
Employees who are subpoenaed to appear as witnesses in a court trial may be granted a leave of absence with pay from their assigned duties until released. The employee shall remit all fees received for such appearances to the City within thirty (30) days from completion of service to the court. Compensation for mileage or subsistence allowance shall not be considered as a fee and shall be retained by the employee.

H. Leave for Attendance at Industrial Accident Commission Hearing or Related Physical Examinations
Employees who have been injured in the course and scope of their employment with the City and who are required, as a result of such injury, to be absent from duty to take physical examinations required by the City's workers compensation insurer or the Industrial Accident Commission shall be granted leave with pay for such absences only if the employee is in pay status at the time of the scheduled examination or hearing. Applications for such leaves of absence shall be filed in advance with the Department Head.

I. Bereavement Leave
The City shall allow an employee to be absent from work a total of five (5) days without pay. The City shall pay for a maximum of three (3) days (33.6 hours for twenty-four hour shift personnel,

14.4 sick leave hours will be granted to complete the hours to 48 hours) for a death which occurs within the State of California. If the death occurs outside the State of California and an employee must travel outside the state, a maximum of five (5) days with pay (60 hours for twenty-four hour shift personnel) shall be allowed. Bereavement leave is allowable in the case of death of an immediate family member which for bereavement only shall be defined as your spouse, child, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, domestic partner, parent-in-law or any in-law or relative with whom you reside.

If additional time is required for any of the above, the employee, with the Department Head approval, may take sick days as needed in compliance with SEC. 702 and SEC. 709 of the City of Tulare Merit System Rules and Regulations.

All other uses of bereavement leave i.e. aunt, uncle, niece, nephew etc. shall be vacation time or other leave banks other than sick leave.

J. Educational Leave
Employees may receive paid leave to attend courses, seminars, workshops or conventions which enhance their knowledge, skills or performance in relation to their job. The determination as to when and whether an employee is granted leave shall be made by the Department Head.

XIX. TERMINATION: LACK OF WORK OR FUNDS
An employee may be terminated by the City Manager because of changes in duties or organization, abolishment of position, shortage of work or funds or completion of work. In cases involving regular employees only, notice of such termination will be given to the employee at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of termination. Such termination shall not be subject to appeal.

In any such reduction in personnel caused by lack of work or funds, seniority shall be observed.

The order of layoff shall be in the reverse order of total cumulative time the employee has served in their current job classification upon the effective date of the layoff. For the purpose of determining order of layoff, total cumulative time shall include the employee's time served in

probationary and regular status and time served on military leave of absence while assigned to their current job classification.

Employees subject to layoff who have seniority in a lower classification may displace (bump) employees in the lower classification having less seniority, provided that the displacing employee is fully qualified and capable of performing the work in the lower classification at the rate of pay for the lower classification.

Any employee bumping into a lower job classification and remaining in said classification for a period of six or more months shall lose their previous classification seniority.

An employee terminated for lack of work or lack of funds shall exist interviewed for an available position, if said employee submits a timely application and meets the minimum qualifications for such position. The above procedure applies for eighteen months. The employee's name shall be placed on a mailing list for the period designated above.

XX. DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
A. Disciplinary Action: Definition
As used in this Article "disciplinary action" shall mean discharge, demotion, reduction in salary, reprimand, disciplinary probation, suspension.

B. Causes for Disciplinary Action
Causes for disciplinary action against any employee may include, but not be limited to, the following:
• Unauthorized absence or tardiness.
• Failure to report absences from work or failure to return immediately from authorized leave.
• Failure to following the instruction of a Supervisor, manager or other property authority. • Disorderly conduct on City premises or while on duty elsewhere, such as, but not limited to, fighting and use of abusive or threatening language. • Possession, use, receiving, distributing or being under the influence of alcoholic beverage or drugs while on duty.
• Falsifying or altering City records, including, but not limited to, employment, medical, pay and benefit records, or permitting one's time card to be recorded by another employee. • Thefts of, or intentional harm to, City or other's personal property. • Dishonesty.
• Violation of safety rules.
• Unauthorized removal of City documents, records or other property. • Negligent or careless performance of duties.
• Failure to meet acceptable standards of performance.
• Failure to observe work schedules or assignments.
• Misuse of City property.

• Unauthorized departure from job, department or City premises. • Loitering or sleeping on the job.
• Gambling on City's premises or while on duty elsewhere. • A personal appearance or mode of dress that is unkempt to the point of being detrimental to the business environment of the City.
• Allowing unauthorized individuals to ride in City's vehicles. • Discourteous treatment of the public or other employees. • Violation of any provisions of these working rules and regulations, administrative policies or written departmental rules and regulations. (amended by Resolution 3856) C. Persons By Whom Disciplinary Action May be Taken
The City Manager or any Department Head may take disciplinary action against an employee under their control for one or more of the causes for discipline specified in this chapter.

D. Procedure Preceding Imposition of Disciplinary Action Prior to initiating any disciplinary action, excluding reprimands, against an employee having regular status, the City Manager or Department Head shall serve written notice on the employee, personally or by certified mail, at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the effective date of the disciplinary action. The written notice shall include:
• A description of the action to be taken and the effective date or dates. • A statement of the reasons for such action, including the acts or omissions on which the disciplinary action is based.
• A statement advising the employee of the right to respond, either verbally or in writing, to the disciplining authority prior to the effective date of the proposed discipline.
• A statement advising the employee that he/she may represent himself/herself or may be represented by a person of their choosing.
• A statement that a copy of the materials upon which the proposed action is based in attached or available for inspection upon request. • A statement that if the proposed discipline is imposed, the employee has a right to appeal.

Upon request of the affected employee, the City Manager or Department Head may extend the response from the employee provided that such extension will have no detrimental effect on the City.

E. Imposition of Disciplinary Action
Upon expiration of the period allowed for employee response and after having given consideration to any response filed by the affected employee, the City Manager or Department Head may impose appropriate disciplinary action.

F. Extraordinary Circumstances
In those extraordinary circumstances wherein the City Manager or Department Head determines that the nature of the employee's act or the charges against him/her are such as to require the employee's immediate removal from the job site, the employee may be placed on leave with pay pending service of the notice of disciplinary action and the effective date of the disciplinary action.

In the case that discipline is imposed and upheld, such leave shall be charged as vacation leave.

G. Right of Appeal
A regular employee shall have the right of appeal to the Human Resources Department from any disciplinary action taken by their Department Head under this chapter, other than oral or written reprimands. Such appeal must be filed with the Human Resources Department within ten (10) working days after receipt of the written notice of such disciplinary action. The appeal must be in writing and must state specifically the reasons upon which it is based.

H. Right of Appeal: Hearing
Upon receipt of a written appeal from an affected employee, the Human Resources Department shall arrange for a hearing as provided in this chapter. Said hearing shall be conducted as soon as possible after receipt of the written appeal. The Human Resources Department shall arrange for the selection of a hearing officer utilizing the services of the American Arbitration Association or State Mediation and Conciliation Services to conduct the hearing and issue a binding decision.

Hearings shall be conducted under the voluntary rules of the American Arbitration Association.

I. Right of Appeal: Representation
The appellant employee shall have the right to appear personally or to be represented by counsel or by anyone else of their choosing, including other City employees, with the exception of supervisory, management and confidential employees.

J. Right of Appeal: Failure of Employee to Appear
Failure of the appellant to appear at the hearing shall be deemed a withdrawal of their appeal and the action of the City Manager or Department Head shall be final.

K. Right of Appeal: Decision
The Hearing Officer shall render a decision within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the hearing or after receipt of the official hearing transcript. The Hearing Officers decision shall be final and conclusive. A copy of such decision shall be forwarded to the appellant. If the disciplinary action taken against the employee is reversed or modified by the Hearing Officer, the employee shall be compensated in all or in part for the time lost as determined by the Hearing Officer. Any appeal of the Hearing Officers decision through judicial review must be filed within ninety (90) days of said decision pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6. (Amending Resolutions: 3091)

L. Effects of Disciplinary Actions

1. Oral Reprimand
Employees may receive an oral reprimand.

2. Written Reprimand
Employees receiving a written reprimand shall have a copy filed in their personnel jacket kept in the Personnel Office. The employee shall initial a copy of the reprimand prior to its filing, indicating that he/she has read the reprimand. The employee shall have the right to enclose a written response to the reprimand in their personnel jacket.

3. Disciplinary Probation
Employees placed on disciplinary probation shall not accrue vacation, sick leave or earned time for salary review while on such probation.

4. Suspension
Employees suspended from the municipal service shall forfeit all rights, privileges and salary while on such suspension with the exception of group health and life insurance benefits.

5. Salary Reduction
Employees who have had their salary reduced shall receive the lowered salary until such time as the Department Head or City Manager determines that an increased salary is merited.

6. Discharge
Employees terminated pursuant to XIX of these rules and regulations shall be paid salary for vacation and worked holidays accumulated to the effective date of termination, subjection to XVII, if applicable.

M. Releasing Information Relative to Disciplinary Actions Against Municipal Employees
In the interest of preventing undue embarrassment and subsequent loss of ability to perform City work effectively, the following policy will prevail regarding release of information to the news media on personnel actions:
• No information shall be released without prior approval of the City Manager. • No information will be released until final action has been determined and taken. • Even after final disposition of the matter, no details will be released other than the exact nature of the action taken.

The foregoing personnel procedure is sanctioned under the Ralph M. Brown Act and related laws.

The Attorney General's opinion interpreting Government Code Section 54957 is as follows:
"The purpose of SEC. 54957 is to protect individual public employees and officers from unfavorable publicity, and to permit private inquiry into the employee's activities, or investigation of charges against such employees."
N. Informal Counseling with the City Manager
Nothing in these rules and regulations shall prohibit the City Manager from meeting informally with an employee regarding possible disciplinary action in order to attempt to resolve the problem.

O. Non-Applicability
The provisions of this section shall not apply to reductions in the workforce or reductions in pay which are part of a general plan to reduce or adjust salaries andwages.

XXI. MISCELLANEOUS
A. Reports of Change of Status
All actions involving employment and change in status of employment shall be reported by the Department Head to the City Manager on City Personnel Action Forms. Copies of such reports shall be furnished to the employee involved.

B. Damage Claims
Any employee of the City filing suit for damages arising from occupational injury shall notify the Finance Director of the amount of damages collected from such suits in order that all expenses paid by the City may be recovered.

C. Gratuities
No officer or employee of the City shall solicit or accept any gratuity for services rendered.

D. Outside Employment
Any regular employee desiring to engage in regular outside employment shall first obtain non-City conflict job approval for their Department Head. The employee shall submit a statement to their Department Head on a standard City form, naming the prospective employer, their address and telephone number and outline the proposed duties and the hours of work. Approval may be denied if, in the opinion of the Department Head, such outside employment is incompatible with the proper discharge of the employee's official duties. All such approvals shall be subject to review by the Personnel Officer and shall be resubmitted prior to January 10 each year to maintain a valid, continuous authorization.

E. Compensation for Use of Private Automobile on City Business Regular City employees may receive compensation for the use of their personal vehicle in City business. Such compensation shall be the prevailing IRS approved rate and upon approval of the employee's Department Head. (amended by Resolution 3629) F. Conflict of Interest
All designated employees shall comply with departmental conflict of interest codes or the applicable regulations adopted by the Fair Political PracticesCommission.

G. Damaged Equipment Review Committee
A Fire Department Damaged Clothing Review Board shall be established for the purpose of reviewing and determining rates of payment for claims for clothing damaged in the line of duty.

No more than one set of glasses may be considered in any two year period. The Board shall be composed of a representatives from Human Resources, Fire Department administrative staff, and the TFCO. (amended by Resolution 3145)
H. Personnel Files
An employee or their recognized employee representative, with the written consent of the employee, shall be entitled to review their personnel folder upon request. The employee shall, in advance, be advised of, entitled to read and respond to all statements written by the employee's supervisor, Department Head or fellow employee of their work performance or conduct if such statement is to be placed in the employee's file. No such material shall be filed until an employee has had the opportunity to review and respond to such material. The employee shall acknowledge that he/she has read such material by affixing their signature on the copy to be filed, with the understanding that such signature merely signifies that he/she has read the material to be filed and does not necessarily indicate agreement with its contents. (added by Resolution 2765) I. Position Reclassification

1. Position Reclassification
An employee who believes their position is wrongly classified may submit a written request to their supervisor for reclassification. Requests shall state the reason the employee believes the present class is not appropriate and which class the employee believes is appropriate, based on the employee's present duties. Requests must be made to the Personnel Department in January or February so that changes may be presented to the City Council in July.

2. Classification Analysis
The supervisor shall forward the request to the Department Head. The Department Head shall then request that the Personnel Officer conduct a classification analysis. When the classification

analysis is completed, a written response will be sent to the employee and the Department Head.

The City shall endeavor to complete the analysis as soon as practicable.

3. Appeals
If the employee disagrees with the response of the Personnel Officer, he/she may appeal to the City Manager in writing. The written appeal must state the reasons why he/she feels that the Personnel Officer's findings were incorrect. The City Manager may review the appeal, assign it to his designee or establish an advisory committee to review the matter. The decision of the City Manager shall be final. (amended by Resolution 3887)
J. Employee Assistance Program Policy
The City recognizes emotional, medical and substance abuse (alcohol and drugs) problems as treatable conditions. An employee's problem with alcohol and drug abuse, etc., will be a concern only when it manifests affect upon their job performance. There is no desire on the part of the City to intrude into the employee's private life. However, if personal problems being to impact job performance, the Employee Assistance Program provides the employee with a possible alternative to disciplinary action. It is expected that the responsibility for recovery rests with the employee.

Employees who suspect they have a problem will take advantage of diagnostic, counseling and assessment services made available through the Employee Assistance Program. (added By Resolution 3001)
K. Flexible Benefit Program
The City shall establish a flexible benefits program, effective October 1, 1987, in accordance with Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code. The City shall contribute the entire implementation cost and the employees shall be responsible for the monthly cost. Participation in the flexible benefits program is available to fire personnel. (added by Resolution 3629) L. Vehicle Use Policy
The City Manager shall determine the allocation of usage of City-owned vehicles in accordance with the business needs of the City. All City-owned vehicles shall be operated in conformance with administrative policy, unless the use of a vehicle is otherwise controlled by contractual agreement or other policy adopted by the City Council.

The City Manager shall be the responsible authority for interpretation and implementation of adopted vehicle use policies. If a Fire Department “pool” vehicle is available it shall be made available for travel to and from educational and training courses with in one hundred and fifty miles (150) round trip. (added by Resolution 3408)
Employees shall be provided a vehicle in accordance with City policy.

M. Wellness Program
The City will provide at no cost to the employee an annual physical in accordance with NFPA 1582, 29 CFR 1910.134, and 29 CFR, 1910.120 (f), as required for anyone who may be exposed to a hazardous substances.

The City agrees that PT for the fire department shall occur at a mutually agreed upon facility. The City shall pay up to $35.00 per month per sworn fire personnel for use of the facility. Any increase in fees beyond the $35.00 shall be subject to the meet and confer process.

N. Station Assignment Policy
It is the policy of the City of Tulare Fire Department to uniformly administer the station assignments and transfer of personnel in a manner that fulfills the needs of the department and considers the desires of the individuals who are affected. If a 40-hour position is created that is the same rank as the equivalent 56-hour position, employees of that rank will bid for shift and nonshift positions. If no employee of that rank volunteers for the non-shift position(s), the Fire Chief will assign the employee with the least seniority in that rank. Members will not bid shifts unless a bid is triggered by the creation of a non-shift position. If that occurs, shift assignments will be bid along with the non-shift assignment and future bids will follow the same bid schedule as other department shift employees.

XXII. INSURANCE
A. Health, Dental, and Vision
For management public safety employees with employee only coverage the employee shall contribute $25 per month towards health care, for those employees enrolled for dependent insurance coverage for a two tier system, the City shall contribute sixty-five percent (65%) of the dependent portion of the premium toward the employee health, dental, vision and life insurance and dependent health, dental, vision and life insurance costs. The employee shall contribute thirtyfive percent (35%) toward the cost of dependent insurance coverage.

Employees shall pay 100 per cent of the total costs of the health insurance premium (with or without dependent coverage). Any increases in future premiums after retirement shall be borne by the retiree. In order to be eligible for said benefits, the employees must directly retire, be at least 55 years of age and have provided ten years of service to the City of Tulare. Management employees with more than 20 years of service with the City of Tulare and obtaining the age of 50 and retiring are eligible to continue on the City health insurance at the same rate as if they were

55. (Amending Resolutions: 00-4687, 06-5374)
If the health insurance administrator recommends future rate increases or program modifications to be implemented, he/she shall make a recommendation to the Health Insurance Committee stating the reasons why such an increase or changes are recommended. The Health Insurance Committee shall then make a recommendation to the City Manager within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of said recommendation. The City Manager will make a decision based on the

information provided and present it to the City Council for implementation. The City and employees agree to pay any increased costs in the same proportion as the current contribution.

This unit will receive $250 per employee toward section 125 medical benefits.

B. Life Insurance
The term life insurance portion of the employee health insurance plan shall be provided for fire management employees as specified in the employee health insurance policy, in the following manner:

Annual Salary Term Life Insurance
$ 10,000-15,000 $ 10,000
$ 15,001-20,000 $ 15,000
$ 20,001-25,000 $ 20,000
$ 25,001-30,000 $ 25,000
$ 30,001-35,000 $ 30,000
$ 35,001-40,000 $ 35,000
$ 40,001-45,000 $ 40,000
$ 45,001-50,000 $ 45,000
$ 50,001-55,000 $ 50,000
$ 55,001 or more An annual amount equal to one times the employee's annual rate of base earnings rounded to the nearest multiple of $1,000 if not already an even multiple thereof, subject to a maximum of $150,000 The premium for said term life insurance will be at the cost of the City. (amended by Resolution 3298)
C. Disability Insurance
The City will payroll deduct from the employee’s check the monthly disability premium amount plus the yearly cost of membership into CSFA. The City shall then pay the premium to the vendor.

Enrollment into CSFA will be handled by the Human Resources Department. ~ Signatures on Subsequent Page ~

CITY OF TULARE TULARE FIRE CHIEF OFFICERS GROUP

Mario U. Zamora Cameron Long
City Attorney Battalion Chief

Janie Venegas Pablo Reynoso
Human Resources Director Battalion Chief

Brandon West
Battalion Chief
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tulare this 16th day of December 2025:

Patrick Isherwood, President of the Council
and Ex-Officio Mayor
ATTEST:

Marc Mondell, City Clerk

By Melissa Wilcox, Chief Deputy City Clerk
Staff Report
Meeting: City Council
Date: December 16, 2025
Department: Human Resources
Submitted by: Janie Venegas, Human Resources Director
Agenda Title: Fiscal Year 2026 Salary Schedule Update

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt a resolution amending the City’s Fiscal Year 2026 Salary Schedule effective December 27, 2025, and authorizing the City Manager to update the Salary Scheule accordingly.

SUMMARY
Earlier this year, the City of Tulare’s represented bargaining groups received negotiated salary increases.

In order to maintain appropriate and consistent salary differentials between certain unrepresented management classifications and their subordinate classifications, provide a cost-of-living update, and maintain competitiveness in the labor market, an update is now recommended.

The following adjustments are proposed as shown in Exhibit A:

1. A 3% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for the following unrepresented classifications: Assistant City Manager, City Engineer, Community Development Director, Community Services Director, Chief Financial Officer, Deputy City Manager/Chief Technology Officer, Executive Director of Economic Development, Fire Chief, General Services Director, Human Resources Director, Police Chief, and Public Works Director.

2. A retention and market adjustment that “resets” the current E-Step to C-Step for the following unrepresented classifications: Assistant City Manager, City Engineer, Community Development Director, Community Services Director, Assistant Community Services Director, Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Finance Director, Deputy City Manager/Chief Technology Officer, Fire Chief, General Services Director, Police Chief, Public Works Director, and Assistant Public Works Director. Employees will also “reset” to the new salary step that reflects their current salary and would then move to the subsequent salary step at their anniversary date, along with a satisfactory performance evaluation, consistent with current practice.

3. A de minimis equity adjustment so that the Community Development Director, Fire Chief, and Public Works Director are on the same pay scale as the Chief Financial Officer.

FISCAL IMPACT & FUNDING SOURCES
Funding for these changes was included in the Fiscal Year 2026 budget across various funds and will be accounted for in subsequent years as a part of the budget development process.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action does not constitute a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

LEGAL REVIEW
This item does not require legal review.

Item #: 7.12
Consent

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as part of the agenda.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

1. Approve with changes

2. Deny

3. Table

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A
Reviewed/Approved:

RESOLUTION 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TULARE
AMENDING THE CITY’S FISCAL YEAR 2026 SALARY SCHEDULE, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 27, 2025, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO UPDATE THE SALARY SCHEDULE

ACCORDINGLY
WHEREAS, Section 36506 of the California Government Code requires that the City Council shall, by resolution or ordinance, fix the compensation for all appointive offices and employees; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 570.5 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulation, payrates shall be duly approved and adopted by the City Council in accordance with requirements of public meeting laws and be publicly available in a salary schedule which identifies the position title for every employee position; the payrate for each identified position, which may be stated as a single amount or as multiple amounts within a range; and indicates the time base, including but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually; and WHEREAS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) requests all CalPERS contracted employers to list their compensation levels in one document, approved and adopted by the governing body, in accordance with Title 2, California Code of Regulations Section 570.5 and meeting all the requirements thereof; and
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-36 adopting the Fiscal Year 2026 Position Control Budget (PCB) and Salary Schedule; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the adopted PCB and Salary Schedule from time to time, as determined by the City Manager, to provide for additional positions and/or changes in salary ranges, which are brought forth to the City Council for approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to maintain equitable and appropriate salary relationships between executive-level classifications and their subordinate positions; and WHEREAS, certain unrepresented classifications are recommended to 3% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA), and/or a retention and market adjustment, and/or an equity adjustment; and WHEREAS, the recommended adjustments are outlined in Exhibit A, which reflects both the current salary schedule and the proposed updated compensation levels; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Manager to update the City’s Master Salary Schedule to incorporate the approved adjustments.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tulare, as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. Resolution 2025-36 is hereby amended to include the compensation adjustments as shown in Exhibit A.

Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to update the Fiscal Year 2026 Salary Schedule accordingly.

Resolution 2025-XX

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tulare this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Patrick Isherwood, President of the Council
and Ex-Officio Mayor
ATTEST:

Marc Mondell, City Clerk
By Melissa Wilcox, Chief Deputy City Clerk
The presence of an electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the Tulare City Council.

Current Salary Schedule Proposed Salary Schedule
Classification A B C D E A B C D E
1 Assistant City Manager # $13,260 $13,923 $14,619 $15,350 $16,118 $15,058 $15,811 $16,601 $17,431 $18,303 2 City Engineer # $11,216 $11,777 $12,366 $12,984 $13,633 $12,737 $13,374 $14,042 $14,744 $15,482 3 Community Development Director *# $12,733 $13,370 $14,038 $14,740 $15,477 $14,578 $15,307 $16,072 $16,876 $17,720 4 Community Services Director # $11,008 $11,559 $12,137 $12,744 $13,381 $12,501 $13,126 $13,782 $14,471 $15,195 5 Assistant Community Services Director # $10,083 $10,587 $11,117 $11,673 $12,256 $11,117 $11,673 $12,256 $12,869 $13,513 6 Chief Financial Officer # $12,838 $13,480 $14,153 $14,861 $15,604 $14,578 $15,307 $16,072 $16,876 $17,720 7 Assistant Finance Director # $10,083 $10,587 $11,117 $11,673 $12,256 $11,117 $11,673 $12,256 $12,869 $13,513 8 Deputy City Manager/Chief Tech Officer # $11,008 $11,559 $12,137 $12,744 $13,381 $12,501 $13,126 $13,782 $14,471 $15,195 9 Exec Director of Econ Development $10,697 $11,232 $11,793 $12,383 $13,002 $11,018 $11,569 $12,147 $12,754 $13,392 10 Fire Chief *# $12,835 $13,477 $14,151 $14,858 $15,601 $14,578 $15,307 $16,072 $16,876 $17,720 11 General Services Director # $11,008 $11,559 $12,137 $12,744 $13,381 $12,501 $13,126 $13,782 $14,471 $15,195 12 Human Resources Director $11,329 $11,895 $12,490 $13,114 $13,770 $11,668 $12,252 $12,864 $13,508 $14,183 13 Police Chief # $14,352 $15,070 $15,823 $16,614 $17,445 $16,298 $17,113 $17,968 $18,867 $19,810 14 Public Works Director *# $12,615 $13,246 $13,908 $14,603 $15,334 $14,578 $15,307 $16,072 $16,876 $17,720 15 Assistant Public Works Director # $10,083 $10,587 $11,117 $11,673 $12,256 $11,117 $11,673 $12,256 $12,869 $13,513 * Denotes Equity Adjustment
# Denotes Retention & Market Adjustment

12.11.25tg
Exhibit A
Staff Report
Meeting: City Council
Date: December 16, 2025
Department: Community Services - Parks
Submitted by: Chris Orr, Community Services Director
Agenda Title: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Award and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Dudek, Inc. of Bakersfield in the amount of $246,440 for preparation of the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan; and authorize the City Manager or designee to approve contract change orders in an amount not to exceed 10% ($24,644) of the total contract amount; and approve a Resolution to appropriate $271,084 in fund balance from within the Parks/Recreation Facilities & Equipment Development Impact Fees (DIF) Fund.

SUMMARY
During a study session at the September 16, 2025, Council meeting, direction was given to staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan. The City received seven proposals and it was a highly competitive process. The selection committee consisted of the Community Services Director, Assistant Community Services Director, Assistant City Manager, City Engineer, and Community Development Director. Staff reviewed the proposals and selected four firms to interview virtually. Ultimately, the selection committee agreed that Dudek was best suited to perform the scope of work.

FISCAL IMPACT & FUNDING SOURCES
Fund balance exists within the Parks/Recreation Facilities & Equipment DIF Fund for this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an agency must complete environmental review prior to committing itself to a definite course of action in regard to a proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15352). Environmental review must occur as early as feasible in the planning process to enable environmental considerations to influence project program and design, yet late enough to provide meaningful information for environmental assessment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15004(b)).

At this time, the City Council is not taking any action that would constitute approval of a Project.

The City Council retains full discretion either to approve or disapprove the project. The appropriation of funds for further study is therefore exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15262 (feasibility and planning studies for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded), as well as the general rule that CEQA only applies to “projects” that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3)).

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

LEGAL REVIEW
This item does not require legal review.

Item #: 7.13
Consent

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the agenda.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

1. Approve with changes

2. Deny

3. Table

ATTACHMENTS

1. Professional Services Agreement & Exhibits

2. Resolution
Reviewed/Approved:

10.14.25tg

CITY OF TULARE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Professional Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of December 16, 2025 between the City of Tulare, a California charter city ("City") and Dudek, Inc., a California SCorporation ("Consultant") with respect to the following recitals, which are a substantive part of this Agreement.

RECITALS
A. The City of Tulare desires to obtain services for the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan ("Services") more fully described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

B. Consultant is engaged in the business of furnishing Services and hereby represents they are qualified, experienced, and capable of performing Services, and possesses any required licenses, certifications, security/bonding, and/or training necessary to perform Services.

C. The City of Tulare desires to retain Consultant, and Consultant desires to provide City with Services, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform Services described in the Recitals and detailed in Exhibit A. Changes in the scope of Services, including the work performed and/or deliverables produced, shall be made in writing and particularly describe the changes in Services, including payment/costs and schedule/term, as applicable.

2. Priority and Conflicts; Exclusions. If the terms and requirements of this Agreement conflict with Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control. No contractual terms and/or conditions found in Exhibit A shall purport to waive, disclaim, or limit Consultant’s liability, indemnification obligations, warranties, damages for breach or delay, or any security, bonding, or insurance requirements, and any such provisions shall have no force or effect with respect to this Agreement and Services performed by Consultant.

3. Term of Agreement; Commencement of Services; Schedule. Consultant shall begin performing Services upon notice from City on or after the Effective Date, unless otherwise instructed by the City, and continue with Services until June 30, 2027 (“Completion Date”). This Agreement may be terminated prior to the Completion Date pursuant to Section 14 herein.

4. Payment for Services. As sole compensation for the performance of Services, City hereby agrees to pay Consultant monthly for services rendered to City pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis according to the rates of compensation as set forth in Exhibit A. The total amount paid by the City to Consultant for Services shall not exceed two hundred forty-six thousand four hundred forty dollars ($246,440). The foregoing is inclusive of all labor, equipment, materials,

10.14.25tg
costs and expenses, taxes, and overhead. Consultant will receive no royalty or other remuneration for the production or distribution of any products developed by City or by Consultant in connection with, or based upon, Services. Consultant shall submit to City an itemized invoice, prepared in a form satisfactory to the City, describing itsservices and costsfor the period covered by the invoice.

Except as specifically authorized by the City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Consultant’s bills shall include the following information to which such services cost or pertain: a brief description of services performed; the date Services were performed; and the number of hours spent, rate, and by whom. Any such invoices shall be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement. City shall make payment on each such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt; provided, however, if Consultant submits an invoice which is incorrect, incomplete, or not in accord with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall not be obligated to process any payment to Consultant until thirty (30) days after a correct and complying invoice has been submitted by Consultant.

5. Independent Contractor Status, Taxes. Consultant is an independent contractor, and nothing contained in this Agreement is intended, or shall be construed in any manner to create or establish the relationship of agent or employee of the City. Consultant has no authority to bind City by contract or otherwise. Consultant will perform the professional services under the general direction of the City Manager or their Designee, subject to the requirement that Consultant shall, at all times, comply with applicable law. Consultant shall pay all taxes, assessments, and premiums under the federal Social Security Act, any applicable unemployment insurance contributions, Workers Compensation insurance premiums (if required), sales taxes, use taxes, personal property taxes, or other taxes or assessments now, or hereafter, in effect and payable by reason of, or in connection with, Services performed by Consultant. Consultant shall be required to possess a valid and current City of Tulare Business Tax Certificate.

6. Warranty. By executing this Agreement, Consultant agrees Services it will perform under this Agreement will be of a professional quality conforming to generally accepted industry standards and practices and that Consultant shall maintain all required licenses and certifications necessary for performance of Services hereunder. Consultant further agrees and represents to City that Consultant possesses, or shall arrange to secure from others, all of the necessary professional capabilities, experience, resources, and facilities necessary to provide City Services contemplated under this Agreement and that City relies upon the professional skills of Consultant to do and perform Consultant’s work. Consultant further agrees and represents that Consultant shall follow the current, generally accepted industry practices to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding Services rendered under this Agreement.

7. Subcontractor Provisions. Consultant shall include in its written agreements with its subcontractors, if any, provisions which: (a) impose upon the subcontractors the obligation to provide to City the same insurance and indemnity obligations that Consultant owes to the City; (b) make clear that City intends to rely upon the reports, opinions, conclusions and other work product prepared and performed by subcontractors for Consultant; and (c) entitle City to impose upon subcontractors the assignment rights found elsewhere in this Agreement.

8. Power to Act on Behalf of the City. Consultant is not acting as an agent of City and shall

10.14.25tg
not have any right, power, or authority to create any obligation, express or implied, or make representations on behalf of City except as may be expressly authorized in advance in writing from time to time by City and then only to the extent of such authorization.

9. Access to Records. Consultant shall maintain all preparatory books, records, documents, accounting ledgers, and similar materials, including, but not limited to, calculations and notes relating to work performed for City under this Agreement, on file for at least three (3) years following the date of final payment to Consultant by the City. Any duly authorized representative(s) of City shall have access to such records for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying at reasonable times during Consultant’s usual and customary business hours. Consultant shall provide proper facilities to the City’s representative(s) for such access and inspection.

10. Ownership of Documents. Title to all final documents, including drawings, specifications, data, reports, summaries, correspondence, photographs, computer software (if purchased on the City’s behalf), video and audio tapes, software output, and any other materials with respect to work performed under this Agreement shall vest with City at such time as City has compensated Consultant, as provided herein, for Services rendered by Consultant in connection with which they were prepared. City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Consultant against all damages, claims, lawsuits, and losses of any kind including defense costs arising out of any use of said documents, drawings, and/or specifications on any other project without written authorization of the Consultant. The provisions of this Section 4 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason.

11. Confidentiality. All work product prepared and performed by and on behalf of Consultant in connection with Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be kept confidential and shall be disclosed only to the City, unless otherwise provided by law or expressly authorized by the City. Consultant shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of any confidential information acquired during performance of Services, except to its agents, employees and subcontractors who need such confidential information in order to properly perform their duties relative to this Agreement. Consultant shall also require its subcontractors to be bound to these confidentiality provisions.

12. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant represents that neither Consultant nor any of its employees have an improper interest, present or contemplated, in Services which would affect Consultant’s or its employees’ performance of Services and the work product produced. Consultant further warrants that neither Consultant nor any of its employees have real property, business interests or income that will be affected by Services. Consultant covenants that no person having any such interest, whether an employee or subcontractor shall perform Services under this Agreement.

During the performance of Services, Consultant shall not employ or retain Services of any person who is employed by City or a member of any City board, commission, committee, or other legislative or recommending body.

13. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. This Agreement and performance of Services are non-exclusive and City reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with Services while this Agreement is in effect.

10.14.25tg

14. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate as provided in Section 3, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the following:
a. Termination by City or Consultant: For Convenience. Either party may, at their discretion, terminate this Agreement for convenience and without cause upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other party. Upon receipt of a termination notice pursuant to this subsection, Consultant shall promptly discontinue all Services affected, unless the notice directs otherwise.
b. Termination by City or Consultant: For Cause. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party of a material breach, and a failure within that time period to cure or commence reasonable steps to cure the breach. c. Compensation to Consultant Upon Termination. Consultant shall be paid compensation for Services satisfactorily performed prior to service of the written notice of termination. As to any phase partially performed but for which the applicable portion of Consultant's compensation has not become due, Consultant shall be paid the reasonable value of its Services provided. However, in no event shall such payment when added to any other payment due under the applicable part of the work exceed the total compensation of such part as specified Section 4. In the event of termination due to Consultant’s failure to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the City, and City may withhold an amount that would otherwise be payable as an offset to the City's damages caused by such failure. d. Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall: (i) promptly discontinue all Services affected, unless the notice of termination directs otherwise; and (ii) deliver or otherwise make available to the City, without additional compensation, all work product and/or deliverables accumulated by Consultant in performing this Agreement, whether completed or in process. Consultant may not refuse to provide such work product for any reason whatsoever.
e. Non-Appropriation; Lack of Available Funds. The parties acknowledge Services to be performed under this Agreement are expected to extend beyond the City’s budgeted fiscal year.

If, during the term of this Agreement, or any renewal term, as applicable, City budget does not appropriate sufficient funds for this Agreement, then City may elect to terminate this Agreement, at its sole discretion, by giving thirty (30) days' prior written notice of termination to Consultant.

Upon termination of the Agreement under this section, City shall have no further liability to pay any funds to Consultant or to furnish any other consideration under this Agreement, and Consultant shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Agreement or to provide services intended to be funded pursuant to this Agreement. If partial funds are appropriated or provided, City shall have the option to either terminate this Agreement with no liability to City or offer an amendment to Consultant to reflect the reduced amount. City represents and warrants that (i) as of the Effective Date, it has appropriated the funds for this Agreement for the current fiscal year and (ii) it shall not use the foregoing right to terminate for non-appropriation as a means to terminate for convenience. Consultant’s assumption of risk of possible non-appropriation is part of the consideration for this Agreement. City budget decisions are subject to the discretion of the City Council.

10.14.25tg

15. Insurance. Consultant shall satisfy the insurance requirements set forth in Exhibit B.

16. Indemnity and Defense. Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from and against all claims, demands, causes of action, actions, damages, losses, expenses, and other liabilities, (including without limitation reasonable attorney fees and costs of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with the alleged or actual acts, errors, omissions or negligence of Consultant or its subcontractors relating to the performance of Services and the safeguarding of any financial data and information obtained from City necessary to perform Services described herein to the fullest extent permitted by law, unless the injuries or damages are the result of the City's sole negligence or willful misconduct, subject to any limitations imposed by law. Consultant and City agree that said indemnity and defense obligations shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement for any items specified herein that arose or occurred during the term of this Agreement.

17. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. Services performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance and full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and city laws and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder.

18. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any duties or obligations hereunder shall be assignable by Consultant without the prior written consent of the City. In the event of an assignment to which City has consented, the assignee shall agree in writing to personally assume and perform the covenants, obligations, and agreements herein contained. In addition, Consultant shall not assign the payment of any monies due 38 Section 8, Item 8D. 5 Consultant from City under the terms of this Agreement to any other individual, corporation or entity. City retains the right to pay any and all monies due Consultant directly to Consultant.

19. Form and Service of Notices. Any and all notices or other communications required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be delivered to, served upon, or given to either party to this Agreement by the other party shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly delivered, served or given by one of the following methods: a. Personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed. Service shall be deemed the date of delivery. b. Delivered by e-mail to a known address of the party to whom it is directed provided the e-mail is accompanied by an acknowledgment of receipt by the other party. Service shall be deemed the date of acknowledgement. c. Delivery by a reliable overnight delivery service, ex., Federal Express, receipted, addressed to the addressees set forth below the signatories to this Agreement. Service shall be deemed the date of delivery. d.

Delivery by deposit in the United States mail, first class, postage prepaid. Service shall be deemed delivered seventy-two (72) hours after deposit.

20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the Exhibits and any other attachments, represents the entire Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral with respect to the subject matter herein. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both City and the Consultant.

21. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

10.14.25tg

22. Severability. In the event any term or provision of this Agreement is declared to be invalid or illegal for any reason, this Agreement will remain in full force and effect and will be interpreted as though such invalid or illegal provision were not a part of this Agreement. The remaining provisions will be construed to preserve the intent and purpose of this Agreement and the parties will negotiate in good faith to modify any invalidated provisions to preserve each party’s anticipated benefits.

23. Applicable Law and Interpretation and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall, in all cases, be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either party. This Agreement is entered into by City and Consultant in the County of Tulare, California. Consultant shall perform Servicesrequired under this Agreement in the County of Tulare, California.

24. Amendments and Waiver. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended in any way, and no provision shall be waived, except in writing signed by the parties hereto. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. Failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

25. Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to confer any rights upon any party not a signatory to this Agreement.

26. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts such that signatures may appear on separate signature pages. A copy or an original, with all signatures appended together, shall be deemed a fully executed Agreement.

27. Alternative Dispute Resolution. If a dispute arises out of or relating to this Agreement, or the alleged breach thereof, and if said dispute cannot be settled through negotiation, the parties agree first to try in good faith to settle the dispute by non-binding mediation before resorting to litigation.

The mediator shall be mutually selected by the parties, but in case of disagreement, the mediator shall be selected by lot from among two nominations provided by each party. All costs and fees required by the mediator shall be split equally by the parties, otherwise each party shall bear its own costs of mediation. If mediation fails to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days, either party may pursue litigation to resolve the dispute. Demand for mediation shall be in writing and delivered to the other party to this Agreement.

A demand for mediation shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for mediation be made after the date when commencement of legal or equitable proceedings based on such a claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by California statues of limitations.

28. Non-Discrimination. Consultant shall not discriminate based on any protected class under federal or State law in the provision of Services or with respect to any Consultant employees or

10.14.25tg
applicants for employment. Consultant shall ensure any subcontractors are bound to this provision.

A protected class includes, but is not necessarily limited to race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, and disability.

29. Performance Requirements. Notwithstanding, and in addition to the provisions of Section 17 of this Agreement, if Services performed hereunder are not in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement and other pertinent documents, City shall have the right to require Consultant to correct the work in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement at no additional increase in the payment to Consultant. Consultant shall promptly correct the work rejected by City for failing to conform to the requirements of the Agreement. Remedy for non-compliance or non-performance shall commence within 24 hours of notice. City shall also have the right to require Consultant to take all necessary steps to ensure future performance of Services in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to correct the work or fails to take necessary steps to ensure the future performance of Services in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement, City shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement for default.

NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement on the date(s) set forth below:

DUDEK, INC. CITY OF TULARE

Name, Title Marc Mondell, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST

Mario U. Zamora, City Attorney Marc Mondell, City Clerk By: Melissa Wilcox
Chief Deputy City Clerk

10.14.25tg
Exhibit A – Scope of Services, Cost Proposal & RFQ
CITY ofTULARE

NATURE PRESERVE

MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 10, 2025

COST PROPOSAL
4900 California Avenue, Tower B 2nd Floor | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | 661.843.6765 | www.Dudek.com PREPARED BY:

RFP #26-827

Dudek Labor Hours and Rates 1
Dudek Labor Hours and Rates
Project Team Role:

Senior
Specialist II
Specialist
III
Specialist
V
Specialist
V
Analyst
II
Specialist
IV
Analyst
II
Specialist
III
Creative
Services IV
Senior
Specialist III
Specialist
V
Senior
Specialist III
Total
Dudek
Hours
Dudek
Labor
Costs
General
Services
CEQA &
Outreach
Support
Other
Direct
Costs Total Fee
Team Member:

Edward
Armstrong
Nicholas
Deyo
John
Zanzi
Meredith
Branstad
Jessica
Baiza
Laurie
Grover
Aliah
Werth
Amanda
Meroux
Raoul
Ranoa
Eric
Hanson
Russell
Sweet
Mark
McGinnis 4Creeks
Billable Rate: $235 $185 $210 $210 $125 $195 $125 $185 $185 $250 $210 $250 Fee Fee Task 1: Project Management,
Meetings and Coordination
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

1.1: Kickoff Meeting and
Site Visit
20 20 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 40 $8,400 -- -- $2,422 $10,822

1.2: Monthly Coordination
Meetings
12 -- -- -- 12 12 -- -- -- -- -- -- 36 $6,660 -- -- -- $6,660

1.3: Project Management 12 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16 $3,560 -- -- -- $3,560 Subtotal Task 1 44 24 -- -- 12 12 -- -- -- -- -- -- 92 $18,620 -- -- $2,422 $21,042 Task 2: Research
and Analysis
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

2.1: Background Research 4 8 -- -- 8 4 -- -- -- -- -- 2 26 $4,700 -- -- -- $4,700

2.2: Existing Conditions
Assessment
8 12 2 4 24 2 -- 8 -- -- -- 12 72 $13,230 -- -- $550 $13,780

2.3: Opportunities and
Constraints Memorandum
8 24 2 2 24 4 -- -- -- -- -- 2 66 $11,440 -- -- -- $11,440 Subtotal Task 2 20 44 4 6 56 10 8 16 164 $29,370 -- -- $550 $29,920 Task 3: Alternative and
Preferred Plans
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

3.1: Draft Alternative Plans 8 16 4 4 48 8 -- -- -- -- -- 2 90 $14,580 -- -- $625 $15,205

3.2: Preferred Design 8 16 2 2 32 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 68 $11,240 -- -- -- $11,240 Subtotal Task 3 16 32 6 6 80 16 -- -- -- -- -- 2 158 $25,820 -- -- $625 $26,445 Task 4: Master Plan -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

4.1: Draft Master Plan 8 32 2 4 48 20 -- 4 2 2 122 $20,570 -- -- -- $20,570

4.2: Draft-Final Master Plan 4 16 4 4 24 4 -- 4 2 -- -- 2 64 $10,970 -- -- -- $10,970

4.3: Final Master Plan 2 8 2 2 12 4 2 2 -- -- 2 36 $6,310 -- -- -- $6,310 Subtotal Task 4 14 56 8 10 84 28 -- 10 6 -- -- 6 222 $37,850 -- -- -- $37,850 Task 5: Public Outreach -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

5.1: Engagement Schedule
and Strategy Document
4 4 -- -- 12 10 -- -- 2 -- 4 -- 36 $6,340 -- $8,332 -- $14,672

5.2: Public Workshops 1
and 2
4 8 -- -- 15 42 5 -- 2 -- 8 -- 84 $15,160 -- $2,325 $220 $17,705 Dudek Labor Hours and Rates 2
Dudek Labor Hours and Rates
Project Team Role:

Senior
Specialist II
Specialist
III
Specialist
V
Specialist
V
Analyst
II
Specialist
IV
Analyst
II
Specialist
III
Creative
Services IV
Senior
Specialist III
Specialist
V
Senior
Specialist III
Total
Dudek
Hours
Dudek
Labor
Costs
General
Services
CEQA &
Outreach
Support
Other
Direct
Costs Total Fee
Team Member:

Edward
Armstrong
Nicholas
Deyo
John
Zanzi
Meredith
Branstad
Jessica
Baiza
Laurie
Grover
Aliah
Werth
Amanda
Meroux
Raoul
Ranoa
Eric
Hanson
Russell
Sweet
Mark
McGinnis 4Creeks
Billable Rate: $235 $185 $210 $210 $125 $195 $125 $185 $185 $250 $210 $250 Fee Fee

5.3: Public Workshops 3
and 4
4 8 -- -- 16 30 5 -- 2 -- 8 -- 73 $12,945 -- $2,325 $220 $15,490

5.4: Public Workshops 6 2 4 -- -- 6 15 2 -- 2 -- 8 -- 39 $7,185 -- $2,325 $165 $9,675

5.5: Interested Parties
Meetings
2 8 -- -- 4 12 -- -- 2 -- 8 -- 36 $6,840 -- -- -- $6,840

5.6: Public Outreach Support
(surveys, social media, etc.)
2 4 -- -- 16 20 8 -- 4 -- 8 -- 62 $10,530 -- -- -- $10,530 Subtotal Task 5 18 36 -- -- 69 129 20 -- 14 -- 44 -- 330 $59,000 -- -- $605 $74,913 Task 6: CEQA Compliance 2 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 8 -- 20 $4,520 -- $51,750 -- $56,270 Total Hours 114 194 18 22 301 195 20 18 20 8 52 24 986 -- -- -- -- -- Total $26,790 $35,890 $3,780 $4,620 $37,625 $38,025 $2,500 $3,330 $3,700 $2,000 $10,920 $6,000 -- $175,180 $0 $67,058 $4,202 $246,440 Percent of Hours (Base) 12% 20% 2% 2% 31% 20% 2% 2% 2% 1% 5% 2% -- -- -- -- -- -- CITY ofTULARE

NATURE PRESERVE

MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 10, 2025

PROPOSAL
4900 California Avenue, Tower B 2nd Floor | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | 661.843.6765 | www.Dudek.com PREPARED BY:

RFP #26-827

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan i A. Cover Letter
November 10, 2025
Chris Orr
Community Services Director
City of Tulare
411 East Kern Avenue
Tulare, California 93274
Subject: Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan Dear Chris Orr:

Dudek is excited to submit our proposal to prepare a Master Plan and associated environmental review documents for the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve.

We understand that the City of Tulare (City) is seeking a comprehensive Master Plan to establish an outdoor recreation and nature preserve (Preserve) at the Elk Bayou, incorporating multi-use trails along both sides of the bayou and foot bridges over the bayou to create a regional trail system that includes interpretive signage, habitat restoration, land acquisition, and redevelopment of the Elk Bayou Park. The Master Plan will identify appropriate uses for the park and act as a guide to prioritize infrastructure investment in the Preserve and ensure that the Preserve supports the City’s mission and helps realize the community’s vision.

Our team is unique in that we offer the City a committed multidisciplinary group of in-house technical experts supported by our strategically selected partner, 4Creeks, Inc. (4Creeks) 4Creeks is headquartered in Visalia and has an office in Tulare.

They have extensive experience working in and with the City and will be leading the CEQA compliance task and working closely with Dudek on public outreach. We are the best qualified team to work with the City on this contract for the following reasons:
▪ Recreation + Restoration Design Experts. Dudek is an
expert at planning, designing, and constructing park,
open space, trail, and habitat restoration projects. Dudek understands habitat restoration and has been restoring
California native habitats throughout the state for over 30 years, including riparian woodlands and creeks. We are

PROJECT MANAGER AND POINT

OF CONTACT
Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSD/QSP
530.863.4269
[email protected]
WHY DUDEK?
45+ Years’ Experience Providing
Planning, Environmental Consulting,
and Engineering Services
Close to 200 Successfully Completed
or In-Progress Master Plan Projects
60+ Projects Successfully Completed
or In-Progress in Tulare County
1,000+ Landscape Architects,
Planners, Environmental Consultants,
Project Scientists, and Support Staff
Recreation and Habitat Restoration
planning and design specialists
Expert-Level Understanding of Local
Regulatory Framework, Community
Concerns, and Permitting Processes
Top 123 U.S. Environmental Firms
(Engineering News-Record, 2024)
Top California Design Firm, No. 54
(Engineering News-Record, 2023)
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan ii specialists at combining recreational amenities with habitat restoration and interpretive education to the benefit of both visitors and wildlife. The Dudek advantage is that we can truly take a project from conception through implementation and beyond, which sets us apart from traditional landscape architectural firms that often lack environmental or engineering services and from smaller multidisciplinary companies that may not employ the full range of specialists that we offer. Our team consists of our deep in-house technical bench of experts, including landscape architects, engineers, environmental planners, biologists, natural resource specialists, urban designers, arborists, aerial surveying specialists, public outreach specialists, and visual storytelling specialists. Our team will look for ways to incorporate co-benefits and environmental considerations in the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan, such as active recreation, creek restoration, and interpretive education to meet the needs of diverse park users.
▪ Committed Management Team. The proposed Dudek project manager for this effort, California registered landscape architect Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSP/QSD, has 27 years’ experience in recreation and habitat planning and design. Some of his key park and recreation Master Plans include a community park for the City of Chula Vista, a regional/community park for the City of Anderson, a destination park for the City of Citrus Heights, and a regional trails implementation plan for San Diego County, among others. He has been managing projects to achieve on-time and within-budget deliverables for over 20 years. Ed will be supported by Deputy Project Manager Nick Deyo, PLA, Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Lead John Zanzi, PLA. Nick has 14 years’ experience in both biology and landscape architecture, while John has 42 years’ experience specializing in design implementation for recreation, public access, and habitat restoration. Ed, Nick, and John bring extensive proven experience in recreation + restoration design.

Together, they will provide the City with the highest level of service and will be 100% dedicated to this project effort.
▪ Local Understanding. Dudek’s deep expertise in Tulare County is demonstrated by our long-standing involvement in dozens of projects across the region.

With more than 60 Tulare County projects, we bring
specialized local knowledge, ensuring that each
project benefits from insights grounded in years of
hands-on experience. Additionally, our teaming
partner 4Creeks, Inc. maintains a long-standing
relationship with the City and is deeply familiar with
local environmental conditions, regulatory processes,
and community expectations. Proposed team member
Traci Myers, previously worked for the City of Tulare,
bringing a truly unique understanding of the City’s
planning objectives, environmental review practices,
general processes, priorities, and expectations.
▪ Inclusive Community Engagement Strategy.

Community engagement is at the heart of our
planning strategy. We recognize that community input
is essential in all planning decisions, and success can only be realized when the community at large is part of the plan development. We prioritize inclusive engagement by developing and executing a diverse set of engagement strategies (community meetings/workshops/pop-up events, surveys, sidewalk/park engagement, etc.) that are intended to reach all audiences. These efforts have been crucial in gathering valuable input and fostering a sense of ownership among community members. Public outreach will be led by Laurie Grover, AICP, in collaboration Our team specifically well-versed in
local climate conditions, seasonal
flooding patterns along Elk Bayou,
and the infrastructure considerations
tied to State Route 99 and adjacent
community assets. Additionally, we
have proposed team members both
work with and separately work for the
City of Tulare, bringing a truly unique
perspective to this project.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan iii with 4Creeks staff. Laurie brings more than 14 years of experience designing and facilitating thoughtful, interactive, and effective engagement programs for a wide range of planning efforts—from parks and recreation master plans to specific plans and community visioning projects. Dudek’s multidisciplinary team of planners and landscape designers excels at developing visually engaging, informative, and accessible outreach materials that meet people where they are—both in person and online—ensuring broad participating and meaningful community input at every stage of the planning process.

We appreciate the opportunity to work on this important and compelling project, and we look forward to the possibility of working with you. If you have any questions about our qualifications or would like any additional information, please contact Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSD/QSP at 530.863.4269 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
__________________________________ __________________________________ Joseph Monaco Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSD/QSP
President and CEO Project Manager and Point of Contact
Joseph Monaco is authorized to sign on behalf of Dudek.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan iv

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan v Table of Contents

SECTIONS
A Cover Letter............................................................................................................................................................................i B General Information.............................................................................................................................................................1 C Proposal.................................................................................................................................................................................5 D Ability to Provide the Requested Services .....................................................................................................................17 E Staff Qualifications and Related Experience.................................................................................................................31 F Compensation – Provided Separately............................................................................................................................45 G Conflict of Interest.............................................................................................................................................................47 H Requested Modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement ................................................................49 TABLE
1 Requested Firm Information ..............................................................................................................................................1

FIGURES
1 Conceptual sketch of Potential Park Improvements.......................................................................................................6 2 Dudek Tulare County Project Experience ......................................................................................................................28 3 Dudek Team Organization ...............................................................................................................................................31

APPENDICES
A Resumes
B Sample Certificates of Insurance with Surety Information C Proposed Schedule
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan vi

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 1 B. General Information
Dudek is a 100% employee-owned California-based
planning, environmental, and engineering consultant with offices nationwide and more than 1,000 landscape
architects, planners, scientists, engineers, contractors, and support staff. We assist public and private clients with a range of projects that improve and evolve our
communities, infrastructure, and natural environment.

From planning, design, and permitting through
construction and beyond, we move projects forward
through the complexities of regulatory compliance,
budgetary and schedule constraints, and conflicting
community interests. Our professionals find practical,
cost-effective approaches to help achieve specific project goals. We work to build your trust, which allows us to offer constructive solutions with each project’s long-term
success in mind.

Firm Overview and Requested Information
Dudek was founded in 1980 in Encinitas, California, by Frank Dudek as a small civil engineering consulting practice working for municipal wastewater agencies and private land developers in San Diego County. The firm steadily grew its civil engineering practice through the 1980s and quickly expanded. In 1990, the firm started an environmental practice in response to expanding state and federal environmental regulations. In August 2019, Dudek opened its Central Valley office in Bakersfield. Since 2012, Dudek has grown its Recreation + Restoration Design team to over 50 landscape architects, planning and urban designers, ecologists, and habitat restoration specialists. This depth of staff and multidisciplinary expertise enables us to successfully deliver master planning projects that balance recreation, habitat, and community needs. See Table 1 for the requested firm information.

Table 1. Requested Firm Information
Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number Dudek
4900 California Avenue, Tower B 2nd Floor
Bakersfield, California 93309
661.843.6765
Firm Representative and Point of Contact Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSD/QSP 530.863.4269
[email protected]
Organization Type S-Corporation
Federal Tax ID Number 95-3873865
City of Tulare Business Tax Certificate Number BL-25350 Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 2 Dudek Owners/Officers
Dudek started an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) in the early 2000s, which we have regularly funded from profits. This continuous commitment to employee ownership culminated in Dudek transitioning to a wholly owned ESOP in 2021. As the firm has grown and evolved, the ESOP has become a defining tool in driving employee engagement by promoting an ownership culture, enhancing employee retirement planning, and bolstering employee retention. The following is a list of our corporate officers:
▪ Joseph Monaco | President and CEO
▪ Eric Wilson | Chief Operating Officer
▪ Pete Campbell | Vice President, Federal Services
▪ Helder Guimarães | Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer
▪ Michael McGrattan | Chief Information Officer
▪ D. Michael Metts | Vice President, Engineering
▪ Amy M. Paul | General Counsel; Secretary
▪ Danielle Voss | Vice President, Human Resources;
Assistant Secretary
Proposed Project Personnel and Continuity of Staff
Dudek has assembled a dedicated team of qualified professionals with the knowledge, expertise, and experience to successfully deliver this project for the City of Tulare (City). Our team specializes in the planning, design, and rehabilitation of public parks and open space areas, with a focus on creating public recreational facilities while preserving and enhancing habitat. Our multidisciplinary team emphasizes cost-effective solutions that meet the needs of the community while considering both construction and life-cycle costs, which are crucial for long-term project success.

Continuity of staff is a cornerstone of successful project delivery at Dudek. Our commitment to long-term staff retention ensures that the team you meet at project initiation remains engaged through completion. With many employees serving for over 20 years, our low turnover fosters deep institutional knowledge, consistent communication, and reliable execution. This stability translates into fewer disruptions, stronger client relationships, and enhanced quality control. Our culture of professional growth further reinforces our ability to maintain a skilled, motivated workforce aligned with project goals.

Proof of Insurance and Surety Information
Per the Request for Proposals (RFP), sample certificates of Dudek’s general and automobile liability, e/o and worker’s compensation insurance with requested surety information are provided in Appendix B.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 3 References and Referrals
Per the RFP, we have provided the following four public agency references for assignments directly involving Project Manager Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSD/QSP. More information on these projects is provided in Section E.

FRANK CARSON | DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Agency Name: City of Chula Vista
Contact Information: 619.585.5618; [email protected] Relevant Project Name: Rohr Park Master Plan Project
Contract Value: $182,860
Project manager and lead landscape architect for the preparation of a Master Plan to guide park improvements in the Chula Vista, California.

SHANNON QUIGLEY-RAYMOND | LAND USE/ENV. PLANNER
Agency Name: County of San Diego
Contact Information: 858.694.2212;
[email protected]
Relevant Project Name: Santa Maria Creek Greenway Project Contract Value: $299,195
Project manager and lead landscape architect for development of an Implementation Plan for trails in the community of Ramona, California.

MATT GRUBER, PLA | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Agency Name: City of Pleasanton
Contact Information: 925.931.5002; [email protected] Relevant Project Name: Augustin Bernal Bike Trail Project Contract Value: $166,684
Lead landscape architect for enhancement of an existing informal downhill mountain bike trail in Alameda, California into an official technical trail.

DON WILCOX | PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Agency Name: City of Soledad
Contact Information: 925.931.5002; [email protected] Relevant Project Name: Wetland Complex Feasibility Study at Soledad Wastewater Treatment Facility
Contract Value: $40,000
Project manager for a feasibility study for the creation of a wetland/riparian habitat complex at a water reclamation facility in Soledad, California.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 4

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 5 C. Proposal
Project Description/Understanding
Located in the southern portion of the City of Tulare, Elk Bayou Regional Park spans approximately 54 acres and
stretches about one mile in length along the Bayou. The park is bordered by Highway 99 to the west, Laspina Street to the east, and Hosfield Drive to the south. Elk Bayou Soccer Complex is approximately 1 mile north of the park, and the Tulare Golf Course abuts the soccer complex on the north side. The Mefford Field Airport is immediately north of the eastern section of the park, so improvements in that area must comply with airport regulations.

The Bayou runs east to west and is surrounded by agricultural land east of Laspina Street. The area adjacent to the Bayou is prone to seasonal flooding.

Existing facilities within the park include a parking lot, picnic/shade shelters, a restroom (currently non-functional), an aging playground, a backstop, and an obsolete potable water system. The picnic shelters, playground, restroom, and water system are in need of replacement or refurbishment.

With increased visitation related to park improvements, the parking lot will likely need expansion or augmentation.

Dudek understands that the City desires to transform Elk Bayou into a regional outdoor recreation and nature preserve destination. Potential updates include the following:
▪ Multi-use trails along both sides of the bayou
▪ Footbridges across the creek to connect trails
▪ Interpretive signage
▪ Habitat restoration
▪ Redevelopment of existing park infrastructure
The Master Plan should also examine potential acquisition of additional parcels to expand the park. Inclusion of a kayak launch point, updated picnic areas, and a high ropes or zipline adventure course are also possible additional uses to be considered.
“In the early 1900’s, John Edwin
Conklin and his wife Anna Rebecca
Conklin purchased 10 acres of
farmland a few miles north of Visalia
in the little farming community of
Ivanhoe. The farm was located at
34585 Road 160.

Their main crops were Emperor
grapes and oranges. Together they
raised six sons on the farm, including
their youngest, Ross Conklin, my
father-in-law, born in 1934. Ross had
fond memories of growing up on the
farm and wandering the Twin Buttes,
about a mile east of their house. As
Ross’ son-in-law, I remember going to
several Conklin family reunions on
the farm in the 1980’s, before the
farm was sold in the 90’s. Sadly it is
no longer in the family.”
− John Zanzi, PLA
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 6 Figure 1 below presents a conceptual sketch of these potential improvements to the park. This sketch is based upon amenities mentioned identified in the RFP and is not meant to suggest a final design. The alternative and preferred design plans developed during this project will be based upon City goals and objectives, community input, a design session with the City, and subsequent input and discussions.

Figure 1. Conceptual Sketch of Potential Park Improvements Our team recognizes the importance of a robust public outreach and involvement process to understand and plan for the variety of park users. Dudek will also collaborate with the City to determine applicability of Assembly Bill (AB) 1572 (2023) and other relevant legislation. AB 1572 prohibits the use of non-essential turf such as areas with strictly ornamental purpose. Since Elk Bayou is a public park, this Assembly Bill likely does not apply to most areas within the park, though there may be some areas where turf, and its associated water use, can be replaced with turf-like groundcover or native plants.

Scope of Services/Work Plan
The following tasks are based upon the City’s Task Order request and outline the Dudek team’s proposed strategy for accomplishing that objective.

Task 1: Project Management, Meetings, and Administration Once Dudek has received notice to proceed, and following preliminary background research in Task 2, the Dudek team will attend a preliminary kickoff meeting with the City to discuss project goals and objectives, establish lines of communication, review the schedule and milestones, and Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 7 discuss other project details. This meeting can take place at the City offices or ideally at Elk Bayou. Anticipated attendees from the project team include the Dudek project manager/lead landscape architect, landscape designer, and a representative from 4Creeks.

On the same day as, and concurrently with, the kickoff meeting, the Dudek team will conduct a reconnaissance site visit and walk the park with the City to discuss potential enhancements to existing amenities and potential new facilities such as trails, habitat restoration areas, overlook decks, interpretive signs, bridges, areas for adventure or nature play, or other features. We will review the condition of existing facilities and identify opportunities and constraints to enhancements to the park, including biological, topographic, or hydrologic factors.

During project execution, Dudek will hold up to 24 bi-monthly coordination meetings with City staff to discuss project progress, potential roadblocks to the project schedule that need resolving, questions, and other pertinent topics.

This task also includes project management and coordination, including development of the Project Schedule of major milestones, preparation of monthly progress reports, ongoing review of budgets and schedules, and email/phone coordination beyond the indicated meetings. This task also includes time to assist the City draft staff reports for presentation of the final report to the City Council. Attendance at the City Council meeting is included in the Master Planning task.

Task 1 Deliverables:
▪ Project schedule of major milestones
▪ Meeting agendas and minutes for kickoff and coordination meetings ▪ Other communication as needed
Task 1 Assumptions:
▪ Project duration will be approximately 12 months
▪ The kickoff meeting and site visit can occur on the same day or concurrently at the park Task 2: Research and Analysis
Upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed, Dudek will conduct background research on the project.

We will assemble existing data, including existing reports including the 2023 City Parks and Recreation Master Plan, existing biological data (California Natural Diversity Data Base), survey data, traffic counts on Hosfield Drive (if available), USGS soils, parcel data, FEMA floodplain/floodway data, and any available topography information in computer-aided design (CAD) or geographic information system (GIS) format to use as a base for the alternative and preferred plans. Dudek will also review and summarize City goals, objectives, and policies for parks and open space as they relate to park use planning.

We will review recreation facilities demands projected over the next 10 years along with other pertinent data, such as facility evaluations, from the Citywide Parks Master Plan and Needs Assessment. Together with conversations with City staff, we will begin to identify potential facility needs such as those included in the RFP and previously mentioned, that could potentially be accommodated at Elk Bayou Park.

This scope assumes that sufficient background data exists to conduct this study, and additional site surveys or studies will not be needed. Unless a civil survey has been done recently, one will likely be needed before moving from the master planning phase into preliminary plans and construction documents, but our expectation is that a civil survey will not be needed for the Master Plan.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 8 Following the site visit in Task 1 and background research, the Dudek team will summarize existing conditions and conduct an opportunities and constraints analysis. Factors rated during the analysis include the following:
▪ Habitat, restoration, and natural resources
▪ Elk Bayou floodplain and site hydrology/drainage
▪ Spatial arrangement and circulation between existing elements ▪ Airport restrictions if any
▪ Recreational connections (trails, bikeways, soccer complex, etc.) ▪ Non-play turf areas available for conversion to low water use landscaping if any ▪ Overall strategies for water use reduction
We will prepare an Existing Conditions, Opportunities, and Constraints memorandum, which will be provided to the City for review and comment. Comments will be incorporated into the Draft Master Plan.

It is anticipated that the first community workshop (see Task 5) will occur after the opportunities and constraints analysis to introduce the project to the public and solicit input on goals, visions, and concerns.

Task 2 Deliverables:
▪ Existing Conditions, Opportunities, and Constraints Memorandum (PDF) Task 2 Assumptions:
▪ Sufficient existing data such as topography, vegetation, aerial photography, soils, etc. exists to support site analysis when combined with observations from the kickoff meeting and information from the CEQA technical studies.
▪ The City will assist Dudek in obtaining existing data, park as-builts, and other information on the site.
▪ This proposal does not include a detailed topographic or boundary survey. If desired, aerial drone Lidar can be provided as a contract augmentation through Dudek’s UAS group.

Task 3: Alternative and Preferred Plans
Based upon conversations with the City, the results of the Task 2 analysis, and input received at the community workshop, Dudek will prepare two preliminary alternative designs for Elk Bayou Park. The alternatives will differ in the types, locations and layout of new facilities and other improvements proposed to be added to the park, as well as changes to existing elements, if any.

Potential improvements might include the following:
▪ Multi-use trails
▪ Pedestrian bridges
▪ Interpretive signage
▪ Habitat restoration
▪ Covered shade structures with picnic tables
▪ Road crossing at St. Laspina Street
▪ Trail connection to the soccer complex
▪ Overlook decks and interpretive signage
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 9 ▪ Parking lot reconfiguration/expansion to include more stalls and Low Impact Development (LID) strategies to reduce stormwater runoff
▪ Riparian restoration along the Bayou and pond
▪ Conversion of ornamental turf to drought-tolerant landscaping ▪ Play/exercise stations located along trails
▪ Adventure play elements
▪ Additional provision for equestrians, including hitching posts and water stations, if equestrians use the park Dudek will hold a half-day charrette with the City to work out the framework for the two design alternatives. This framework will consist of a list of elements to be included in the plan along with design sketches. The details will be worked out in the charrette but could include a “light-handed” touch and a “full-featured” approach.

Note that as part of this scope of work, if interpretive signs are desired, Dudek will work with the project team to define number of and topics for signage, but design of interpretive signs is not included in this proposal.

Interpretive design can be included as an optional or add on service.

An important component of design development is first order cost estimates. Cost estimates provide an assessment-of-value reality check to ensure that project goals and objectives are aligned with project financing.

During design alternatives development, a cost–benefit analysis will be prepared to determine the most appropriate approach to meet project goals and objectives. We will refine the cost estimate during development of the preferred plan and the Master Plan document to verify that the final conceptual design will conform to the available funding. The cost estimate spreadsheet in the Master Plan will be organized by phase and will itemize the estimates for expected planning, design, permitting, and construction costs for the project. Providing accurate cost estimates at each stage of the design process helps keep the project on track.

The alternative designs will be presented to the City for review and comments. Designs will be updated then presented to the public at the second community workshop (see Task 4). Based upon input received from the community workshop and feedback from the City, Dudek will identify and prepare a preferred design. The preferred design will likely be a combination of elements from both alternatives.

Task 3 Deliverables:
▪ Draft alternative designs and cost estimates (PDF)
▪ Final preferred design and cost estimate (PDF)
Task 3 Assumptions:
▪ The preferred design will be similar to one of the alternatives or a combination of elements from both alternatives and will not require a full redesign. ▪ One round of review and comments will suffice for the alternative and preferred designs.

Comments on the preferred design will be incorporated into the Master Plan Task 4: Master Plan
Dudek will compile the Existing Conditions, Opportunities, and Constraints Memorandum, a summary of public outreach efforts, and alternative and preferred designs together with a discussion of how the park meets the City’s recreation and open space goals, descriptions of the proposed improvements, cost estimates, phasing strategy, and potential grant funding into the Master Plan.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 10 We anticipate that the Master Plan will contain the following sections:
▪ Executive Summary
▪ Introduction and Background
▪ Goals and Objectives
▪ Public Outreach Summary
▪ Existing Conditions, Opportunities,
and Constraints
▪ Alternative and preferred Designs
▪ Proposed Improvements
▪ Implementation and Funding
▪ Maintenance and Management
▪ Cost Estimates
The Implementation and funding section will include an assessment of additional studies, permits and environmental compliance review that will be needed, in addition to cost estimates for planning, permitting, construction and post-construction maintenance; project phasing; and potential opportunities for grant funding.

The Master Plan will be presented in draft format for City review and comments. Comments will be incorporated into the Draft-Final Master Plan, which will be submitted for City review and comments. The Final Master Plan will address comments received and will be provided in PDF format.

The Final Master Plan will be presented to City Council during a regularly scheduled meeting.

Task 4 Deliverables:
▪ Draft Master Plan (PDF)
▪ Draft-Final Master Plan (PDF)
▪ Final Master Plan (PDF)
Task 4 Assumptions:
▪ Two rounds of review/comments (draft and final-draft) prior to issuance of the final draft will be sufficient to obtain approval on the Master Plan. Additional rounds of comments can be accommodated under a contract augmentation
▪ The City will coordinate distribution of the Master Plan draft and draft-final for internal review.

Task 5: Public Workshops and Outreach Support
Public engagement will serve as a cornerstone of the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan, ensuring the resulting vision reflects the values, priorities, and lived experiences of the Tulare community. A welldesigned engagement process helps ensure that the Master Plan reflects the community’s vision and can also help build the broad support necessary to attract funding for implementation.

Dudek, as the prime consultant, will lead the design and implementation of a comprehensive public engagement strategy that emphasizes accessibility, inclusivity, and creativity. Building upon the foundation established during the City’s 2023 Parks and Recreation Master Plan effort, the outreach program will draw in residents, park users, and interested parties through multiple, complementary engagement formats. Our local partner, 4-Creeks, will support in-person engagement by facilitating meetings and bringing valuable local relationships to ensure meaningful participation from the community.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 11 Engagement Schedule and Strategy Document
At project Notice to Proceed, Dudek will draft an Outreach and Engagement Plan that outlines our plan for presenting the project to the community. The Outreach and Engagement Plan will confirm meeting event milestones and touchpoints, methods and formats, and tools for engagement with the community and interested parties.

Our outreach program will include a mix of event types to maximize participation:
▪ Targeted Meetings with interested parties to better understand their key issues and needs ▪ Pop-up events at Elk Bayou Nature Preserve to engage directly with park users ▪ Traditional workshops held at City Hall and nearby accessible, community locations to share project updates, explore design alternatives, and/or gather focused input. One of the workshops will be held at Council Chambers prior to a regularly scheduled Council meeting.

Interested Parties Meetings
To support development of the Tulare Bayou Preserve Master Plan, Dudek will facilitate up to two 90-minute virtual meetings with key community and interested parties organizations, such as the Tulare Chamber of Commerce and the International Agri-Center, to gather input on the overall Master Plan direction. As part of the Outreach and Engagement Plan, Dudek will work with the City to identify two primary interested parties to meet with as part of this task. Each meeting will include a short presentation summarizing the project background, goals, and conceptual framework, followed by a facilitated discussion to identify local priorities, partnership opportunities, and potential community benefits of the Preserve. Dudek will work with the City to identify and invite participants.

Workshops
Dudek will conduct up to five public outreach events designed to present project milestones and solicit community input, visions, and feedback. Events will be strategically aligned with key stages of the planning process to ensure meaningful engagement at each step. At least one meeting will be held before a City Council meeting at Council Chambers, and others may occur in person or as pop-up events in the community. For Phases 1 and 2, we propose hosting both a traditional workshop and a pop-up event to engage a broad range of participants. The same activities will be used at each event to ensure consistency in feedback and findings, with only the setting adapted to reach different audiences.

The recommended structure includes the following:
▪ Workshops No. 1A and 1B: Conducted following the opportunities and constraints assessment and prior to developing alternative design concepts. These workshops will focus on understanding community vision, desired uses, safety and maintenance concerns, and other key considerations. ▪ Workshops No. 2A and 2B: Conducted after revisions to the alternative designs and before identifying the preferred alternative. The goal is to receive input on the design options and capture any ideas or refinements not previously addressed.
▪ Workshop No. 3: Conducted following revisions to the Draft Master Plan and prior to delivery of the DraftFinal Plan. The objective is to gather feedback on the Draft Master Plan to ensure the final product reflects community priorities and expectations.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 12 Each outreach phase will include a weekday evening and/or weekend opportunity for participation. Weekend events may take the form of informal pop-up events hosted at Elk Bayou Nature Preserve to reach park users directly. Traditional workshops may be hosted at City Hall or at nearby locations to the park such as the Tulare Golf Course. Each workshop will be up to two hours in duration, not including set-up, break-down, and travel. Dudek assumes that the City will be responsible for reserving meeting locations.

In support of the public outreach program, Dudek will develop up to four 3D renderings depicting the character of the experiences for the proposed changes to the park. Views will be taken from “eye level” or “low-elevation aerial” and will be coordinated with the City prior to development. One round of revisions will be made to the renderings based on City input.

We will prepare up to four color rendered maps (one for each alternative and one for the preferred alternative) illustrating the proposed improvements(s). The maps will include color linework and infographics over an aerial photograph. All maps will be to-scale and labeled for presentation purposes. One round of revisions will be made to the maps based on City input.

Finally, Dudek will coordinate with City staff to meet public notification requirements and develop a clear, accessible public outreach strategy to communicate the planning process, progress updates, and key findings to the community. Interpretation services at meetings will be the responsibility of the City.

Outreach Materials
Dudek will prepare visually engaging and bilingual outreach materials, including translated boards and handouts.

Dudek will also provide flyers and social media content for City review prior to each event to help maximize community participation. In support of Phases 1 and 2, Dudek will develop content for up to two short (up to 10- question) digital survey to provide an alternative for those unable to attend in-person events. Dudek will prepare survey content, analyze results, and assumes the City will host the surveys on the project website. Dudek assumes one round of review for all draft outreach materials.

Task 5 Deliverables:
▪ Public outreach strategy
▪ Attendance of up to three staff at two virtual interested parties meetings ▪ Attendance of up to three staff at up to five in-person outreach events (two pop-up events and three traditional workshops)
▪ Preparation and printing of up to three outreach boards per in-person outreach event ▪ Workshop No. 1 A and B supporting materials, notes, and summary (two meetings) ▪ Workshop No. 2 A and B supporting materials, notes, and summary (two meetings) ▪ Workshop No. 3 supporting materials, notes, and summary (one meeting) ▪ Preparation of two draft and final digital surveys (two surveys) ▪ Conceptual project renderings/maps, including design files (four renderings) ▪ As-needed translation services for workshop materials Task 5 Assumptions:
▪ Dudek will provide materials to the City for notification of the public on the workshops and pop-up events, and the City will distribute the notices.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 13 ▪ The City will provide a facility for the Workshops and coordinate needed materials (tables, chairs, etc.)
▪ Workshops will be jointly facilitated by the Dudek Team and the City, with the City presenting general information such as introductions, project goals, and background, and the Dudek Team presenting content specific to each workshop, such as activities, display boards, etc. ▪ Workshops and pop-up events will be jointly staffed by the Dudek Team and the City. ▪ One round of review will be sufficient for approval of outreach materials for each workshop/popup event.

Task 6: CEQA Compliance
We agree with the City that the project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has indicated that the project will require an initial study (IS) for its CEQA clearance, which is anticipated to result in a mitigated negative declaration (MND).

The Dudek team will research, air quality/greenhouse gas emissions modeling, a Sacred Lands File search and Tribal Consultation list through the California Native American Heritage Commission, California Historic Resources Information System search (historic database searches), etc., to support the findings of an IS/MND. It is well documented that the San Joaquin Valley floor has an historic Native American presence and bodies of water (such as lakes, rivers, streams, etc.) were typically settled by Native Americans. As such, we are recommending a Cultural/Tribal Cultural assessment (generalized as a cultural resources assessment) be conducted. Due to the presence of Elk Bayou, we are recommending a query of the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) that would identify sensitive biological resources (i.e., animal and plant species). If a special-status species is identified as a result of the CNDDB, an assessment should be undertaken to address potential impacts to special status species and/or riparian habitat.

Although there are no nearby sensitive receptors (such as, adjacent residences), it is likely that the project will require, at a minimum, a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) screening to comply with San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (Air District) requirements due to likely extensive heavy-duty vehicle emissions during earth moving activities. In the event that the proposed project does not screen out of HRA thresholds, a full HRA model run would be required to satisfy the Air District.

In addition, the Dudek team can assist the City in complying with AB 52 Tribal Consultation, compliance with Indirect Source Review (Rule 9510) which may be required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; preparing CEQA required documents such as a Notice of Intent, Notice of Availability of an MND; and preparing and filing of a Notice of Determination with the County of Tulare Clerk’s Office and the California State Clearinghouse.

We are unaware of the City’s vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis requirements or if the City will determine that the proposed project is exempt from VMT. If requested, the Dudek team can provide a VMT analysis at additional cost. Similarly, we are unaware of the City’s threshold regarding the need for a traffic impact assessment; however, we are noting that increases in vehicle traffic will result in potential impacts to other CEQA resources items such as increases to air quality emissions, greenhouse gases, VMT, and energy consumption (fuels), other traffic related impacts such as levels of service and traffic flow patterns. For an additional cost, the Dudek team has the capabilities to prepare a traffic impact assessment from traffic-related impacts.

Task 6 Deliverables:
▪ Technical Studies (PDF)
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 14 ▪ Administrative Draft IS/MND (PDF)
▪ Screencheck Draft IS/MND and MMP (PDF)
▪ Draft IS/MND and MMP (PDF*)
▪ Final Draft IS/MND and MMP (PDF*)
* Hardcopies available upon request
Task 6 Assumptions:
▪ Technical studies will be limited to those listed in this section. Additional studies, if required, can be conducted under a contract augmentation.
▪ Except for technical studies, which will begin during site assessment, the CEQA document preparation will begin once a preferred design is identified.

Project Management Approach
At Dudek, effective project management begins with proactive, transparent communication and organization. Our approach ensures that all interested parties remain in sync through consistent updates, collaborative planning, and responsive issue resolution. The following management/work plan outlines key elements of our communication strategies and leadership practices that have been proven to drive project success.

Project Management
Every project benefits from strong, consistent leadership and proactive communication. Our project manager, Ed Armstrong, serves as a single point of contact, ensuring high-quality deliverables while also monitoring and reporting on budget and schedule adherence. Our management approach to this project emphasizes the following key elements: senior technical oversight and daily administrative management; continuous and clear communication; schedule and cost monitoring and reporting; quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC); virtual collaboration and technology; peer-to-peer collaboration, and technical oversight and administrative management.

Dudek focuses on regular communication and coordination with our clients. We hold regular face-to-face meetings or teleconferences and prepare agendas, minutes, and notes to ensure a clear understanding of critical issues, allowing work to proceed in a unified manner. Our check-in meetings allocate resources according to each client’s schedule and constraints. Dudek identifies areas where information sharing reduces the schedule, budget, or effort needed to produce quality deliverables.

Proposed Lines of Communication
The most effective project manager facilitates a continuous flow of information, data, instructions, and guidance between the City and Dudek staff. By maintaining this flow, we utilize resources efficiently and minimize wasteful rework. We achieve constant communication through regular calls or emails with the City’s key contact to discuss milestones, activities, and potential issues; holding project management meetings with key staff to coordinate efforts, monitor task completion, and review budget conformance; updating project descriptions, schedules, progress reports, and data inventories so all team members remain informed; meeting with City staff at strategic junctures and project milestones; and diligently documenting issues, action items, and decisions to ensure clarity and accountability.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 15 Cost and Schedule Control
Dudek uses a variety of computerized project management systems to assure cost and schedule control. We also hold regular team meetings to maintain communication, monitor cost, and monitor schedule performance. Additionally, Dudek includes the required District invoice information to facilitate smooth processing and approval. Dudek will work with City staff to further customize invoicing.

Proactively managing the project scope, budget, and schedule is critical to the success of any project. Dudek consistently evaluates our project managers’ performance based on measurable criteria and provides training, coaching, and mentorship programs to support them. Your success is our success, and our commitment to providing the best training, tools, and resources to our project managers is a key reason our projects outperform other firms in the industry.

Virtual Collaboration and Technology
Dudek uses the following tools and technologies for efficient, productive virtual collaboration:
▪ File Sharing/Storage via ShareFile, allowing Dudek to store, share, exchange, and track information by providing a centralized location for documents and data ▪ Document Co-Authoring simultaneously through SharePoint via the Client Portal ▪ Mobile Data Collection, allowing field data capture solutions for efficient analysis ▪ Virtual Meetings via Zoom, Teams, or another platform to conduct real-time online meetings ▪ GIS-based mapping, research, and alternatives evaluation QA/QC Methodology
Dudek employs a rigorous, multi-tiered QA/QC process to ensure the highest quality deliverables for nature preserve master planning projects. Every work product, whether technical analysis, design document, or public-facing material—undergoes systematic internal review by senior subject matter experts. Our robust ensures that all project components are accurate, defensible, and aligned with client goals, regulatory requirements, and best practices in nature preserve planning. Dudek’s methodology includes the following:
▪ Project-Specific QA/QC Plans. Each project begins with a tailored QA/QC plan outlining review protocols, responsibilities, and milestones.
▪ Multidisciplinary Peer Review. Deliverables are reviewed by experienced professionals from relevant disciplines (e.g., biology, landscape architecture, engineering, planning) to ensure technical accuracy, regulatory compliance, and integration across specialties. ▪ Milestone Checkpoints. Key deliverables are subject to formal QA/QC checkpoints at draft, draft-final, and final products, with documented feedback and resolution tracking. ▪ Senior Oversight. A dedicated project manager and QA/QC lead oversee all reviews, ensuring consistency with Dudek’s standards and client expectations.
▪ Continuous Improvement. Lessons learned and client feedback are incorporated into future projects, supporting Dudek’s culture of continuous quality enhancement.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 16 Proactive Risk Mitigation and Management
Dudek employs a proactive approach to risk management in planning projects by tailoring strategies to specific project needs. Our uncompromising commitment to hiring high-quality employees is the first and most important step in our risk management process. Our goal is to avoid compromising events entirely, which can only be achieved when the right people are assigned to your project. In the event that unforeseen risks are encountered, however, we work quickly and efficiently to control any damages.

Our approach to issue resolution is characterized by the following:
▪ Early Detection. Dudek employs an early detection approach to issue resolution with our clients. Observed problems will be discussed immediately with the appropriate individuals to avoid or correct any discrepancies. In his role as project manager, Ed will be the primary point of contact for issue resolution.

Regardless of the time of day, he will be immediately available to address any issues that may arise under this contract.
▪ Corrective Action. Dudek will work closely with the City to identify and implement corrective actions for any issues that may arise under this contract. In the event that an issue arises with Dudek’s performance, Ed will immediately engage the appropriate executive management to investigate the situation and develop the appropriate corrective actions.
▪ Closure. Once corrective actions have been implemented, Dudek will follow up with the City to verify that the issues have been resolved. Dudek will disseminate the results of the corrective action process to the project team to avoid repeating similar issues under this contract.

Time of Completion Schedule
Dudek anticipates a schedule of approximately 12 months for this project. Our full proposal timeline is provided in Appendix C.

Cost Proposal – Provided Separately
Per the RFP, our cost proposal has been provided in a separate sealed envelope.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 17 D. Ability to Provide the Requested Services
Dudek has 24 years’ experience successfully delivering Master Plans and has close to 200 completed or in-progress planning projects. We have the expertise, perspective, and experience to deliver a comprehensive Master Plan, facilitate public engagement, and ensure environmental compliance for the City.

Dudek plans have been recipients of multiple American Planning Association (APA) awards, including the 2024 Award of Merit in Comprehensive Planning for our work on the City of Newport Beach Comprehensive General Plan Update, the 2025 Los Angeles Section Merit Award in the Resilience and Sustainability category for our work with the County of Los Angeles, and the Sacramento Valley Section APA Award in the Climate Action Planning category for our work on the Yolo County Climate Action Plan. Per the RFP, we have provided our experience and level of expertise providing similar master planning services with brief descriptions of past municipal work.

Municipal Master Planning Experience
Since 2001, our multidisciplinary team has developed planning documents for more than 60 municipal agencies (in addition to dozens of private entities). We recognize the challenge California public agencies face delivering superior services while managing tighter budgets, fluctuating workloads, more regulations, and increasingly complex projects that require in-depth technical specialization. Similar California municipalities we have done master planning work with include the Cities of Anaheim, Carlsbad, Chino, Chula Vista, Coachella, Compton, Corona, Downey, El Centro, Encinitas, Fullerton, Irvine, La Mesa, Laguna Beach, Lomita, Los Angeles, Newberry, Pasadena, Placentia, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redlands, San Fernando, San Juan Capistrano, San Luis Obispo, San Marino, Signal Hill, Solvang, Temecula, Visalia, Vista, and others.

The following are brief descriptions of select municipal master planning work. Additional relevant municipal experience is also provided in more detail in Section E.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 18 City of Long Beach and City of Irvine – Urban Forest Master Plans Dudek developed urban forest master plans for both Long Beach and Irvine, helping these cities enhance their green infrastructure. The plans included tree inventory and health assessments, community engagement, and strategies for expanding and maintaining urban tree canopies to improve air quality and urban livability.

City of La Mesa and City of Temecula – Storm Drain Master Plans Dudek worked with both the City of La Mesa and City of Temecula to prepared storm drain master plans that addressed flood risk, water quality, and infrastructure resilience. These projects involved mapping existing drainage systems, modeling stormwater flows, and recommending improvements to protect public safety and property.

City of Vista – Wastewater and Stormwater Master Planning Dudek supported the City of Vista with both wastewater and stormwater master planning. The work included system mapping, condition assessments, and the integration of sustainable practices to meet regulatory standards and community needs.

City of Carlsbad – Sewer and Water Master Plan Updates
Dudek worked closely with the City of Carlsbad to update its sewer and water master plans. This involved detailed hydraulic modeling, infrastructure assessments, and the development of capital improvement strategies to ensure reliable service for a growing community. The project also included stakeholder engagement and compliance with regulatory requirements.

City of Encinitas – Sewer Master Plan Updates
For the City of Encinitas, Dudek provided multiple updates to the sewer master plan, including the Cardiff and Encinitas Sanitary Divisions. These projects focused on evaluating existing infrastructure, identifying system deficiencies, and recommending phased improvements to support future development and environmental sustainability.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 19 Multidisciplinary Master Planning Expertise
Landscape Architecture Master Planning and Site Design
Dudek’s Landscape Architecture Master Planning and Site Design approach integrates environmental stewardship, regulatory compliance, and innovative design to create sustainable, ecologically sensitive spaces. Our Master Plans balance habitat restoration with recreational use, ensuring natural features are preserved while meeting community needs and regulatory requirements. We incorporate best practices for multi-use recreation areas and habitat restoration to deliver projects that reduce mitigation costs and streamline timelines. Our team blends science and design—hydrology, ecology, and restoration—with creative solutions for parks, trails, and open spaces. We emphasize native plants, water conservation, interpretive education, and nature-themed play to foster healthy habitats and engaging public spaces. Working collaboratively with biologists, engineers, and planners, we guide projects from concept through post-construction monitoring, delivering cost-effective, low-maintenance designs that enhance habitat and provide meaningful public access.

Plaza and amphitheater designed for an open space park in a new community in Southern California Habitat Restoration and Creek Design
Dudek brings decades of experience in planning, designing, constructing, establishing, and monitoring habitat restoration projects. Our services span the full lifecycle—from site assessment and conceptual planning to detailed design and preparation of construction documents (plans, specifications, and estimates [PS&E]), through physical site construction, plant establishment, and post-construction monitoring. We also provide regulatory compliance and permitting assistance to streamline implementation, ensuring projects meet environmental mandates while staying on schedule and within budget.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 20 Our decades of experience include bank stabilization for erosion and sediment control, habitat enhancement and rehabilitation, and floodplain management, including implementing a variety of restoration techniques including biotechnical treatments incorporating native revegetation with natural materials such as logs and boulder to create sustainable structural systems, and native revegetation for terrestrial and aquatic habitat.

Our multidisciplinary team integrates geomorphic, biological, and land-use considerations into engineering design, specializing in site plans, preliminary engineering, hydrology and hydraulics for surface and stormwater drainage, and environmental compliance measures such as SWPPPs and erosion control. We deliver grading plans, irrigation and planting designs, native revegetation, and biotechnical treatments for erosion control and water quality improvement.

Additional capabilities include mapping, transportation planning for roads and trails, and infrastructure design for water, sewer, and storm drain systems. By blending science, engineering, and creative design, Dudek creates resilient, ecologically robust habitats and engaging public spaces that balance technical requirements with financial and scheduling constraints.

In addition, Dudek brings first-hand knowledge of constructability, implementation techniques and efficiencies, and construction costs to inform restoration project planning and design. For over 25 years, our construction staff has successfully performed habitat restoration installation and long-term maintenance services. We have obtained agency sign-off on hundreds of projects, more than any other contractor in California. As such Dudek applies a proactive, adaptive management approach and provides a one-stop shop from planning and design through construction and monitoring for comprehensive habitat restoration services for all types of habitat in California.

CEQA Expertise
The Dudek team of more than 50 CEQA/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) practitioners has access to more than 550 planners and environmental experts, which allows us to provide local experience, strategic advice, and technical expertise. Dudek environmental experts work collaboratively with clients; local, regional, state, and federal agencies; and the public to clearly define project objectives, address concerns, and outline appropriate processes. We apply practical CEQA/NEPA knowledge to comply with current laws, regulations, and case law. Our planners help clients creatively solve regulatory challenges within financial and scheduling constraints. We produce complete CEQA/NEPA documents done right the first time. Our environmental planners work with our in-house technical editors and graphic designers to prepare high-quality documents that are clearly organized and easily interpreted by the public, agencies, and decision makers responsible for future project development.

Additionally, 4Creeks has extensive experience providing CEQA environmental planning services for the City of Tulare and other Central Valley municipalities. Our team has prepared environmental documentation for a range of City projects, including the Tulare Avenue Road Rehabilitation, Cartmill Avenue Improvements, and various housing, infrastructure, and roadway initiatives. These projects have required Initial Studies, Mitigated Negative Declarations, and technical analyses addressing topics such as air quality, biological and cultural resources, hydrology, and traffic. With staff experienced in both agency and consultant roles, 4Creeks understands the City’s review processes and expectations, allowing us to prepare clear, defensible CEQA documents that support project approvals and regulatory compliance.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 21 Innovative and Effective Community Engagement
Dudek brings extensive experience in public outreach and engagement, ensuring communities are active participants in planning and environmental processes. Our engagement approaches are always tailored to the specific needs of the communities in which we work. We specialize in designing and implementing outreach strategies that foster transparency and trust. Our team offers proven strategies for inclusive community engagement that reach beyond the usual participants to ensure that diverse voices shape the plan. We believe public engagement should be fun, accessible, and meaningful. Our team is skilled in communicating with the public to elicit actionable feedback and focus the conversation on the planning activity at hand. We communicate the scope of the planning effort and how the results will be used, gaining trust with the community and interest groups, based on a shared understanding and goals. Recent project highlights include development and successful execution of a multi-phase outreach strategy for the City of Chula Vista’s Rohr Park Master Plan, Facilitation of public workshops and outreach events for the City of Goleta’s Creek and Watershed Management Plan, and dozens of others.

Dudek-designed interactive activities that allow for quantification of community feedback.

Regional Biological and Ecological Experience
Dudek offers extensive biological and ecological expertise rooted in decades of experience across California’s diverse landscapes. Our team includes certified biologists, ecologists, botanists, and wildlife specialists with deep knowledge of Central Valley and San Joaquin Valley ecosystems. Dudek’s experts have led habitat assessments, restoration planning, and environmental compliance for numerous nature preserves, parks, and open space projects throughout the region. We are adept at identifying sensitive habitats, rare and endangered species, and ecological constraints unique to the Tulare area. Our science-based approach ensures that Master Plans are grounded in the latest ecological research, regulatory requirements, and best practices for habitat restoration and stewardship. Dudek’s strong relationships with local, state, and federal Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 22 resource agencies further streamline permitting and project delivery, ensuring that ecological values are protected while supporting community recreation and access.

Civil Engineering and Infrastructure Design
Dudek’s civil engineering team delivers the technical foundation for successful landscape architecture and open space projects. Our civil engineers specialize in grading plans, stormwater management systems, hydrology and hydraulics modeling, erosion control, and utility infrastructure design for water, sewer, and storm drains. We ensure compliance with environmental and regulatory standards while optimizing constructability and long-term performance. Additionally, our traffic engineering capabilities complement these services by addressing roadway design, intersection improvements, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and parking layouts to enhance safety and accessibility. From preliminary engineering and traffic analysis to detailed construction documents and cost estimates, Dudek combines engineering rigor with sustainable design principles. This multidisciplinary approach creates open spaces that function efficiently, support habitat restoration, and meet community needs for connectivity and resilience.

Integrated Creative Services and Visual Storytelling
The Dudek Creative Services group, comprising the Design and Layout, Media Production, and Visual Storytelling teams, has extensive experience providing engaging design and visual communications that translate technical subjects and marketing messages effectively. Our in-house visual storytelling and creative services staff specialize in creating simple, elegant, and compelling visuals that communicate complex data and ideas. We understand that simplifying complex concepts (and stripping them of jargon) is the first critical step in conducting informed conversations with the public.

Planning graphic created by the Dudek Visual Storytelling team for a similar project Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 23 The Dudek project team is highly skilled in modern visualization tools. We can harness multiple techniques—3D renderings, data visualization, GIS, animation, interactivity, illustrative novels, and technical illustrations—to engage and inform both expert and non-expert audiences. We will utilize CAD technology to generate alternative and preferred plans, supplemented by eye-level, photo-realistic, and conceptual 3D imagery that portrays proposed features, such as overlook decks, trails, and bridges.

Visualization created by the Dudek Visual Storytelling team, showing the original condition of a structure (left) and the Dudek Project team’s (Ed Armstrong and John Zanzi) proposed plan (right), reimagining the space as a museum-like room with interpretive signs and wall displays Dudek’s Visual Storytelling team has a proven track record in leading the development of multiple signage projects, including a mural at the Port of Portland and interpretive signs at the Carlsbad Poinsettia Station and the City of Davis. The team is also currently developing an educational mural in the state of Washington. The team, which includes a former sign shop owner well-versed in sign fabrication and installation, draws from a wide range of experience working with major media, scientific organizations such as JPL and NASA, and architectural firms.

Our team has previously developed a variety of Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant and multiculturally sensitive content for governmental agencies. A sample of Dudek’s creative portfolio can be viewed at the following sites:

Visual Storytelling Design + Layout Media Production
https://ims.dudek.com/visualstorytelling http://ims.dudek.com/designandlayout https://ims.dudek.com/filmandphotography Additional Suggested Services
In addition to the services proposed in our scope of work and highlighted above, we would also like to suggest the following services to enhance and expedite our project work.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 24 In-House Data Collection, Surveying, and Mapping
The Dudek Mapping and Surveying team has experienced licensed land surveyors located across North America. Our team specializes in ALTA Surveys, LiDAR Topo Surveys, Design Level Site Mapping, and web-based Mapping Solutions. The team has provided mapping services since 1980 and continues evolving to leverage new data collection methodologies and delivery systems.

Dudek brings decades of experience in land surveying and geospatial services, specializing in boundary surveys, topographic mapping, utility location, and regulatory compliance. Our team has successfully delivered highaccuracy surveys for municipalities, special districts, and private developments throughout the state, ensuring projects meet all local, state, and federal requirements. We employ advanced surveying methodologies, including GPS, robotic total stations, 3D laser scanning, and GIS-based mapping, to provide precise and legally defensible survey data. Our expertise extends to conducting thorough property record research, easement identification, and coordination with utility providers, ensuring all surveys align with current site conditions and legal constraints.

Our team is well-versed in California’s zoning laws, land development codes, and permitting processes, allowing us to efficiently navigate project requirements while maintaining the highest accuracy standards. Whether performing boundary delineations, analyzing topographic features, or generating GIS-compatible deliverables, Dudek is committed to delivering reliable, high-quality survey solutions.

GIS Services and Custom-Built Mapping Portal
Dudek has dedicated department of GIS professionals. Our GIS and mapping professionals work with public agencies and private clients to design and implement GIS data collection and management systems that turn geospatial data into valuable information for making timely, informed project decisions.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 25 For the Tulare Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan, the Dudek project team will leverage GIS technology for soil, hydrology, floodplain and topography analysis. Our array of services, from GPS data capture, high-end analysis, and modeling to complex application development with legacy database integration, will help the City achieve all project or program goals. We offer an integrated GIS approach to assist our field data collection through an internally developed mobile platform that enables “live” data transfer to our network, as well as a “dashboard” for data management, planning, work tracking, and budgeting. Our application developers enhance existing and create new web and mobile applications. We have created hundreds of web GIS applications for data interaction, analysis, and data manipulation. Our client systems include easy-to-use analytical tools, allowing nonGIS staffers to perform a variety of tasks.

Through a suite of mobile and web-based tools, we combine off-the-shelf software and custom-built integrations to visualize data from smartphones, tablets, and web browsers. Using databases and map-based graphical user interfaces to synthesize data from multiple sources, our tailored solutions mean systems stay open and flexible while meeting project-specific needs. Cloud-based systems streamline data collection and reporting plus start-tofinish compliance monitoring ensures your project abides with regulations long term.

Airborne Lidar Mapping
Our firm brings industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to on-call land surveying and mapping services, specializing in uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) lidar operations with high-end Riegl lidar scanners. These advanced systems, renowned for their precision and reliability, enable us to capture millions of data points per second, providing exceptional accuracy and efficiency. Our UAV lidar capabilities are tailored for projects that range from a few acres to expansive areas up to 10,000 acres, making us a trusted partner for a wide variety of surveying needs.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 26 To maximize the value of UAV lidar, we employ a hybrid survey approach that integrates the speed and broad coverage of airborne lidar with the precision of ground-based surveying techniques. Airborne lidar is used to rapidly capture large-scale topographic data and generate 1-foot contours, while ground-based surveying collects supplemental data to refine critical survey details and ensure compliance with accuracy standards and regulatory requirements. This methodology allows us to deliver results that combine efficiency with uncompromising detail.

Our UAV lidar services support a broad range of applications, including topographic mapping, boundary and ALTA surveys, construction and engineering support, and environmental studies, such as floodplain modeling, wetland delineations, and forestry analysis. Deliverables are tailored to meet specific project needs and can include 1-foot contours, digital elevation models, orthophotos, 3D point clouds, CAD-ready files, and site-specific analytics, such as volume calculations.

By utilizing UAV lidar, we provide faster turnaround times, reduced costs, and unparalleled data accuracy, even in challenging or remote terrain. With extensive experience and a commitment to quality, we handle projects of all sizes and complexities, from small-scale developments to expansive multi-thousand-acre sites.

Photogrammetry and Planimetrics Mapping
Our photogrammetric mapping services experts leverage advanced aerial imaging technology to provide highly detailed and accurate geospatial data for a variety of applications. By capturing highresolution images using state-of-the-art UAV systems, we create precise orthophotos, 3D point clouds, and digital surface models. This method is particularly effective for projects requiring large-scale coverage and high-resolution visuals, such as site planning, infrastructure development, and environmental monitoring.

Using photogrammetry, we generate reliable deliverables that meet stringent accuracy requirements, including contours, digital terrain models, and CAD-ready files for engineering and design workflows. This cost-effective and efficient mapping technique allows us to produce detailed visualizations and measurements, enabling informed decision-making for a range of industries. Whether your project spans a few acres or thousands, our photogrammetric mapping ensures fast, reliable, and visually rich geospatial data tailored to your needs.

Our planimetric mapping services provide detailed 2D representations of natural and manufactured features on the earth’s surface. Utilizing UAV technology and advanced mapping software, we extract precise data to delineate features such as buildings, roads, curbs, utilities, vegetation, and other site-specific elements. This meticulous approach ensures the accuracy and usability of planimetric data for engineering, construction, and urban planning projects.

We specialize in creating CAD-ready deliverables that integrate seamlessly into design workflows, supporting applications such as site development, infrastructure planning, and asset management. Our team combines aerial mapping techniques with ground verification as needed to produce planimetric maps with unparalleled detail and reliability. Whether for large-scale municipal projects or detailed site plans, our planimetric mapping services provide the clarity and precision necessary for effective project execution.

StoryMaps/Experience Builders
At Dudek, we have learned that to maximize community involvement, it is crucial to break down any barriers that may prevent the public from conveniently participating in the project planning process.

In our digital age, developing a web resource that clearly defines the City of Tulare’s goals and timeline is essential for effective public outreach.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 27 Dudek’s GIS and Visual Storytelling teams use Esri StoryMaps/Experience Builder and other modern web development tools to develop public outreach platforms that encourage public involvement and engagement.

StoryMaps/Experience Builders work seamlessly with GIS data to power data-driven interactive maps and visuals and can easily house contact forms for collecting public input.

Creating these Web-enabled solutions often leads to additional use cases for the technology. An essential part of our work is to provide value beyond the current project and empower our clients to harness and utilize these technologies across their organizations for future initiatives. The Dudek team will ensure that the City of Tulare has the necessary resources and support to maintain and update the site.

Interactive StoryMaps created for the Inland Empire Community Foundation’s Regional Priority Plan and the San Bernardino Mountains Regional Priority Plan (SCAN THE QR CODES!).

Additional Relevant Information
Extensive Knowledge of Local Conditions and Local Presence Dudek’s deep expertise in Tulare County is demonstrated by our long-standing involvement in dozens of projects across the region. Our work spans local government planning, urban development, environmental compliance, biological surveys, hydrogeology, and energy. We bring specialized local knowledge, ensuring that each project benefits from insights grounded in years of hands-on experience with Tulare County’s communities, ecosystems, and permitting processes. Our team specifically well-versed in local climate conditions, seasonal flooding patterns along Elk Bayou, and the infrastructure considerations tied to State Route 99 and adjacent community assets.

See Figure 2 for a map of Dudek’s Tulare County experience.

Additionally, our teaming partner 4Creeks, Inc. (4Creeks) has an office located in the City limits and previously provided on-site contract planning services for the City, managing CEQA compliance and ordinance updates firsthand. Moreso, several key 4Creeks staff, including proposed team member Traci Myers, previously worked for the City of Tulare, bringing a truly unique understanding of the City’s planning objectives, environmental review practices, general processes, priorities, and expectations.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 28 This collective blend of technical expertise and local experience will allow our team to anticipate site-specific challenges such as access, drainage, and habitat connectivity, and to develop creative, resilient design solutions that reflect The City’s community values and long-term sustainability goals.

Figure 2. Dudek Tulare County Project Experience
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 29 Track Record of On-Time, Within Budget Project Delivery Dudek has built a reputation for delivering projects on time and under budget, thanks to our strategic clientfocused approach and deep, multidisciplinary technical expertise. Our track record speaks for itself—by fostering collaboration, optimizing resources, and proactively addressing challenges, Dudek consistently provides clients with reliable results while maximizing value. Additionally, our staff work at the intersection of science, engineering, regulations, and community concerns to ensure efficient project execution. Our proposed management team will work together to ensure performance, meet communication goals, and keep this project on schedule and budget.

Why Dudek?
What is the Dudek Advantage? Our unique capabilities include the following:
▪ A one-stop shop for Recreation + Restoration design and implementation, providing the full range of services: registered landscape architects (PLAs), planning and urban designers, professional civil engineers (PEs), habitat restoration specialists, and construction specialists ▪ Decades of experience in providing the full range of the design process: from conceptual design alternatives to Master Plans on through detailed PS&Es, construction and post- construction monitoring ▪ Proven experience with environmental compliance permitting, including numerous mitigation and monitoring plans based upon the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and California Department of Fish and Wildlife requirements
▪ Decades of CEQA and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) experience with public agency and water infrastructure clients–more than 3,800 documents, none of which have been successfully challenged in court
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 30

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 31 E. Staff Qualifications and Related Experience
Our Project Team: Regional Experts with Community Ties
Dudek has assembled a dedicated team of qualified professionals with the knowledge, expertise, and experience to successfully deliver this project for the City. Our multidisciplinary team emphasizes cost-effective solutions that consider both construction and life-cycle costs, which is crucial for long-term project success.

As mentioned, Dudek’s team for this project includes dedicated staff who live and work around the Tulare County and the Southern San Joaquin Valley, fostering a deep connection to the region. This local presence allows us to bring firsthand knowledge and a nuanced understanding of the area’s unique environmental and community dynamics to every project. By being part of the community, Dudek staff are not only committed professionally but also personally invested, ensuring solutions are both practical and impactful.

To provide one channel for clear communication, Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSD/QSP, will serve as the project manager and the City’s primary point of contact for the duration of the project. Ed is supported by Deputy Project Manager Nick Dayo, PLA; QA/QC lead John Zanzi, PLA; our highly qualified project team; and our depth of technical resources.

Figure 3 outlines our team organization, lines of communication, and reporting structure for this project.

Figure 3. Dudek Team Organization
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 32 4Creeks, Inc. – Local CEQA and Public Outreach Support
Our team will be joined by 4Creeks, Inc. (4Creeks), who will provide CEQA and public outreach support. 4Creeks is a dedicated planning, civil engineering, architecture, land surveying, and construction management and inspection firm. They currently have a staff of over 200 professionals working in Tulare, Visalia, Hanford, Clovis, San Luis Obispo, Malibu, and Denver. Economical design considerations, environmental stewardship, and resource efficiencies are tenets of every project they undertake. They pride themselves on pioneering innovative solutions that enhance the value of their projects, keep costs in check, and deliver lasting results. 4Creeks has a strong history of partnership with the City of Tulare, having successfully delivered multiple projects that align with the City’s vision for community-focused and sustainable development. Their City projects include Zumwalt Park, Tulare Business Innovation Zone and TBIZ Makerspace, and the Tulare Homeless Shelter.

Additionally, they have provided on-call planning, surveying, and engineering services for the City. They have the proven ability to collaborate with City staff, manage public engagement processes, and navigate local regulatory requirements to produce high-quality, implementable plans. Their team’s familiarity with the City’s expectations, standards, and review processes will ensure an efficient and responsive approach throughout the development of the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan.

Key Personnel Qualifications
Ed Armstrong, PLA, QSD/QSP
PROJECT MANAGER | POINT OF CONTACT
As mentioned, Ed Armstrong is a senior habitat restoration specialist and licensed landscape architect with expertise in park, open space/trail, and natural systems planning and design. Ed has 24 years’ experience in planning and design for parks, trails, and open space systems; wetland, stream, and riparian restoration projects; watershed and creek systems; and streetscapes, with a focus on enhancing public use while preserving and restoring natural habitat. Ed has been involved in all phases of project development, including site assessment, conceptual design, master planning, construction drawings, cost estimates, technical specifications, construction management, phasing, and community outreach.

Ed is experienced with the permitting process, including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other agency permits, and he has drafted operations and management plans for preserves that contain preserved, mitigated, or rest ored resources.

Ed is also recognized for his ability to manage and deliver complex, technically challenging projects, especially those that combine recreation facilities with habitat enhancement projects and is particularly passionate about interweaving these elements in a design to the benefit of humans and the environment. His project management approach is marked by rigorous planning, engagement with interested parties, client communication, regulatory compliance, and technical excellence.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 33 Nick Deyo, PLA

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
Nick Deyo, PLA, will be the Deputy Project Manager for this project. He is a professional landscape architect with 14 years of experience who holds degrees in both biology and landscape architecture. He has successfully combined these two fields over the course of his career. Nick has designed restoration and mitigation plans for wetland, riparian, and upland projects across the West. In addition to natural systems, Nick has designed and overseen construction for park facilities, trail systems, and commercial-scale planting and irrigation projects. At the planning scale, Nick has experience in Master Plan development for campuses and institutions and has developed conservation plans for county government and non-profit organizations. He is an expert at using GIS/CAD software to effectively convey planning and design intent across multiple project scales.

John Zanzi, PLA
QA/QC
John Zanzi, PLA, is a landscape architect with 41 years’ professional experience throughout California and the western United States. He specializes in design implementation for recreation and public access, such as park facilities and trails; ecosystem restoration and native plant revegetation, including riparian system and wetland mitigation; and water-quality improvement, erosion control and biotechnical slope stabilization. John’s expertise includes preparing site assessments, design and construction documents (plans and specifications), and cost estimates, as well as conducting value engineering and bid and construction assistance for planting, irrigation, and other landscape components. He has extensive knowledge and experience in conducting field design and adaptive management, providing construction direction and oversight, and maintaining construction records, including as-built drawings. In addition, John applies his direct hands-on and practical construction, maintenance, and post-construction monitoring experience to his planning and design projects. For most of his projects, John serves as the landscape architect of record, preparing detailed design documents, technical specifications, and cost estimates; endorsing construction documents; and providing construction oversight for quality project implementation. Additionally, John’s father-in-law’s family owned and managed 10 acres of farmland a few miles north of Visalia in the little farming community of Ivanhoe for nearly 100 years; their main crops were Emperor grapes and oranges.

Russell Sweet

CEQA/BIOLOGY-BOTANY
Russell Sweet is a biologist with 18 years’ experience working with special-status and endangered species throughout California, with an emphasis on species in the Central Valley.

Russell is responsible for biological survey data collection and plant and animal species identification, with an emphasis on rare, threatened, endangered, and sensitive species and vegetative communities. He has conducted numerous common and special-status species surveys and habitat impact analyses in Kern, Kings, Tulare, Fresno, San Bernardino, Orange, Riverside, Inyo, and Los Angeles Counties, and performed focused surveys for San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), Nelson’s antelope squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni), blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia sila), least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), and California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica). Russell has written numerous environmental impact Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 34 reports, environmental impact statements, biological assessments, and natural environment studies in accordance with CEQA and NEPA. He has also authored wetland delineation documents.

Laurie Grover, AICP

OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT
Laurie Grover is a planner with 14 years’ experience specializing in local and regional land use planning and public engagement. During her four years at Dudek, Laurie has specialized in public outreach and engagement for parks and recreation planning, helping communities shape inclusive and inspiring public spaces. She offers a unique combination of public sector experience in long-range planning, community engagement, technical analyses, policy development, and grant writing and administration. Her multidisciplinary expertise spans a range of planning efforts—including Regional, Area, General, and Master Plans, parks and recreation planning, and resilience planning—and she is skilled in facilitating meaningful dialogue among diverse parties to build consensus and advance community goals.

Traci Myers – 4Creeks
OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT | CEQA
Traci Myers serves as Executive Director at 4Creeks, Inc., bringing over 25 years of experience in economic development, organizational leadership, land use, and environmental planning. Traci maintains a long-standing relationship with the City and is deeply familiar with local environmental conditions, regulatory processes, and community expectations. Her firsthand experience includes providing on-site contract planning services for the City, where she managed CEQA compliance and ordinance updates. This local expertise allows her to deliver tailored, responsive CEQA services that align with City goals and support responsible community development. Traci is also well-versed in local climate conditions, seasonal flooding patterns along Elk Bayou, and infrastructure considerations tied to State Route 99 and adjacent community assets. Her work has shaped award-winning initiatives like the Downtown Tulare Master Plan and the Economic Development Investment Program, both recognized for their impact on revitalizing the community and stimulating private sector investment. Traci’s blend of technical expertise and local experience enables her to anticipate site-specific challenges such as access, drainage, and habitat connectivity, and to develop creative, resilient design solutions that reflect Tulare’s community values and long-term sustainability goals.

Relevant Dudek Experience

ROHR PARK MASTER PLAN
Client: City of Chula Vista
Contract Value: $182,860
Period of Performance: 2025–Ongoing
Key Dudek Team Member(s): Ed Armstrong (Project Manager and Lead Landscape Architect), John Zanzi (Landscape Architect), Laurie Grover (Outreach Specialist), Jessica Baiza (Ecological Designer and Habitat Restoration Specialist) Dudek is currently preparing a Master Plan to guide improvements to Rohr Park and the City’s Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course in the City of Chula Vista, including strengthening linkages to regional trails, enhancing native vegetation and habitat within the park, and improving park Scan Me! Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 35 amenities for lesser-served groups. The project includes public workshops and pop-up events, the development of alternative and preferred improvement plans, cost estimates for the implementation of proposed improvements, and recommendations for maintenance and management. The plan prioritizes recreational equity, accessibility, ecological enhancement, celebration of cultural heritage, and climate adaptation, ensuring that this interconnected parkland continues to serve as a thriving, inclusive, and resilient community asset. Dudek’s outreach strategy is designed to meet people where they are—through pop-up events, online surveys, and social media outreach (accessible via the QR code above)—while also offering traditional opportunities for input through public workshops. This approach ensures that a broad range of voices help shape the Master Plan and that the community remains informed and involved throughout the planning process.

To date, Dudek has conducted site assessments; prepared an existing conditions, opportunities, and constraints memorandum; conducted six of the eight public workshops; prepared alternative plans for park improvements; and is currently preparing the Draft Master Plan document for City and public review.

SANTA MARIA CREEK GREENWAY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Client: County of San Diego
Contract Value: $299,195
Period of Performance: 2024–2024
Dudek holds an as-needed consulting services contract for CEQA, resource monitoring, and biological restoration services for the County of San Diego’s Department of Parks and Recreation. Services include CEQA/NEPA support; biological, cultural, hazardous materials, and other specialized resource research, monitoring, surveying, and analysis; resource management planning (including restoration activities); and long-range or broad-scale planning document preparation.

Under this contract, Dudek prepared a feasibility analysis and implementation plan for an approximately 2-mile unpaved trail system known as the Santa Maria Creek Greenway in the community of Scan Me!
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 36 Ramona. The project kicked off with a site visit to evaluate road crossings, proposed trail alignments, connections to public facilities, potential biological resource impacts, and other factors. Dudek also researched project background information, including available GIS and other data for the project area, such as parcel ownership, land use, topography, existing easements, and biological resources. Findings from the site visit and background research were included in an existing conditions summary memorandum.

A public workshop was held to present the project background and results of the existing conditions assessment, and solicit feedback from the community on the project, including attendee values, priorities, and concerns. The format of the workshop was a brief presentation followed by tabling sessions set up to discuss key aspects of the project, such as land ownership, desired amenities, and potential alignments.

Dudek held a half-day workshop with the County to review community input and work out the fundamentals of the alternative designs. We engaged the client in collaborative decision-making during design to clarify design decisions and ensure the plan met the client’s expectations. Following the workshop, the alternatives were refined and presented in an alternative alignments memorandum that included alignment plans; detailed cost estimates with planning and design, and implementation projections; and proposed road crossings, such as high-visibility (triple four) crosswalks, a rapid flashing beacon, and a pedestrian hybrid beacon. The alternatives were presented at a second public workshop.

The Implementation Plan summarized the previous work efforts and regulatory environment and refined the alignments and cost estimates to include easement acquisition and operations and maintenance costs. It also included design guidelines, vignettes for key access points, and discussions of phasing, funding, and maintenance and monitoring for the trail system.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 37

AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL
Client: City of Pleasanton
Contract Value: $166,684
Period of Performance: 2020–2024
Dudek developed construction documents (PS&E) for a downhill technical mountain bike trail, approximately ¾ of a mile long, within the City of Pleasanton’s Augustin Bernal Park. This trail connects to trails in the East Bay Park District’s Pleasanton Ridge Regional Park. Augustin Bernal Park had experienced significant erosion and degradation in recent years due to off-trail mountain bike use and unauthorized trail construction. The City wanted to create a fun and engaging experience that would encourage mountain bikers to use the designated trail and reduce the desire to build unauthorized trails and trail features. The objectives of this project were to widen and stabilize sections of the existing trail where the alignment is appropriate; decommission sections of trail that are too steep or otherwise infeasible; and add engaging and challenging trail features, such as jumps, drops, and berms to improve the trail experience and encourage riders to stay on the trail.

In addition to developing the PS&E for the trail, Dudek prepared an MND for the project, including technical studies required under CEQA. This trail was built in Alameda whipsnake critical habitat, and there was a question on whether formal USFWS consultation would be needed because of potential impacts to the snake.

We facilitated informal consultation with USFWS and demonstrated that significantly more area would be restored to natural habitat through closing, decompacting, and revegetating unauthorized (ad hoc) trails than were impacted by project implementation. We also included a provision to have a whipsnake-certified wildlife biologist present during construction. USFWS accepted these measures as mitigation for any potential impacts, so we were able to implement the project without a costly permitting effort, which would likely have prevented the project from being built.

Construction on the project occurred in Spring 2023, and the trail opened that summer. It has been well received by the mountain biking community.

Scan Me!
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 38

SOLEDAD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY WETLAND COMPLEX FEASIBILITY STUDY Client: City of Soledad
Contract Value: $40,000
Period of Performance: 2020–2024
Dudek conducted a feasibility study for the creation of a wetland/riparian habitat complex with passive recreational enhancements in the retired infiltration basins at the Water Reclamation Facility. Dudek visited the site to meet with the City, discuss goals and objectives for the project, and assess opportunities and constraints. We collected preliminary surface soil samples and reviewed previous soils reports, then conducted hydrological modeling to determine a range of combinations of wetland type, size, and amount of clay amendments and compaction necessary to support functioning wetlands given anticipated treated wastewater input rates. Evaluating present and historical habitats in the adjacent Salinas River and working with City officials to identify desired recreational enhancements, along with the results of the hydrological modeling, Dudek produced a set of conceptual design alternatives comprising a wetland complex with open water, emergent wetland, perennial marsh, riparian scrub, and riparian wetland habitats and public access elements, including parking lots, trails, overlooks, fencing improvements, a restroom, a boardwalk, educational signage, and other amenities. Dudek also developed phasing and maintenance plans, along with detailed cost estimates, to allow the City to evaluate the financial and logistical feasibility of the project. To assist in project implementation, Dudek identified potential funding sources and aided the City in submitting a grant application for Proposition 1 funds.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 39 RANDALL PRESERVE: GENGA RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, PUBLIC ACCESS PLAN, AND COASTAL

RESILIENCE STRATEGY
Client: Coastal Corridor Alliance dba Banning Ranch Conservancy Contract Value: $885,029
Period of Performance: 2024–Ongoing
Dudek is currently leading a multidisciplinary team to provide resource planning for the 385-acre Randall Preserve – Genga Property which was recently conserved by the State of California. The team is tasked with preparing a Resource Management Plan, Public Access Plan, and Coastal Resilience Strategy that addresses climate change and sea level rise. Dudek has coordinated with the Coastal Corridor Alliance and the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority (titleholder and preserve manager), participated and supported a robust community engagement program, Tribal Access and Engagement Program, and Advisory Committee engagement. Dudek collected biological data to update a 10-year database of existing data including remapping vegetation communities and conducted surveys for California gnatcatcher, least Bell’s vireo, cactus wren, and burrowing owl. Dudek produced a draft Resource Management Plan that establishes a framework for long term land management. Ther RMP describes several management action levels that address legacy oil field disturbance including weed control, road decommissioning, and restoration to reduce historic habitat fragmentation and increase habitat continuity to benefit wildlife species. The plan identifies a high touch opportunity to re-establish tidal sat marsh across 100 acres of lowland area that is currently cut off from tidal influence. A public Access Plan included in the RMP provides an overview of public access opportunities including an arrival area, hiking trails, lookouts, and educational opportunities. Dudek is working with the Randall Preserve Advisory Committee to find the appropriate balance of public access while preserving and managing sensitive biological resources within the preserve.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 40

TILDEN POND RESTORATION AND PUBLIC ACCESS PROJECT
Client: East Bay Regional Park District (Berkeley); Subconsultant to NCE Contract Value: $78,160
Period of Performance: 2016–2018
The Tilden Nature Area is a portion of the park that is rich in cultural and biological resources and provides important flood management services. Dudek was part of an interdisciplinary team to assess existing conditions; complete technical studies and CEQA compliance; obtain required permits; and prepare PS&Es for recreation and habitat improvements in a sensitive and designated critical habitat area.

Dudek provided planning and design services for the project, which included creating a decomposed granite trail, interpretive signage, an overlook deck, an amphitheater with logs for seating, a stepping-stone drainage crossing, and habitat restoration. The focus of the project was centered on restoring three existing ponds that provide special-status species habitat for the federally threatened California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) and a variety of other special-status species with the potential to occur within the park.

We prepared landscape architecture plans, details, and specifications, including layout, planting, and irrigation plans and details; an irrigation schedule and notes; construction details for the overlook deck, amphitheater, drainage crossing, and other items associated with the recreational and restoration elements; and structural calculations. In support of the construction documents, we prepared detailed construction cost estimates of the project implementation. The estimates included a brief description, identification of the relevant unit, approximate quantity, unit cost, and calculation of the extended cost for each item based on construction bids received from past projects, industry standards, and our professional experience. The impetus for the project was to restore capacity of an instream sediment basin in sensitive habitat and, by capitalizing on the mitigation that would be required by permitting agencies, complete pond restoration on site, thereby enhancing habitat and park user experience.

In addition, we provided construction services including a preconstruction meeting; reviewing contractor Requests for Information and submittals; conducting observations of hardscape, irrigation system, plant materials, and planting construction; facilitating Final Acceptance of construction; and provided technical input related to the installed landscape components for a postconstruction report.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 41

CITY OF DAVIS COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND STRATEGIC PLAN Client: City of Davis
Contract Value: $223,582
Period of Performance: 2023–2025
Dudek provided technical plan development as well as outreach, communication, and engagement to the City of Davis for the development of a community needs assessment. The team conducted internal staffing interviews and developed a departmental mission and vision, along with a strategic plan for the operation, maintenance, and development of new and ongoing programming, recreational facilities, and infrastructure. The work included inperson tabling events, meetings, site visits, in-person interviews, workshops, and the facilitation and development of technical memoranda, a needs assessment, and the strategic plan. Dudek led the project, coordinated and managed work products, managed subconsultants, and ensured a high caliber of deliverables.

As part of the outreach process, we developed and managed a public survey that collected community feedback regarding existing/future assets and programs to guide investment in recreation facilities and programs. In addition, our in-house graphic design team created logos, branding, infographics, and a Esri Story Map for the public outreach effort.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 42

MEMORIAL PARK MAGENTA DRAIN RESTORATION
Client: City of Grass Valley
Contract Value: $137,898
Period of Performance: 2025–Ongoing
Dudek was selected by the City of Grass Valley to lead the planning, design, and environmental clearance, and permitting for the restoration of approximately 800 linear feet of the Magenta Drain channel within Memorial Park. This project is funded by a $319,848 Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Grant and aims to restore ecological function, improve water quality, reduce flood risk, and enhance public access along the historic Magenta Drain.

The Magenta Drain, originally constructed in the mid-1800s to discharge groundwater from the Empire Mine, had been contaminated by legacy mining activities. Following extensive remediation and soil cleanup completed in 2013, the channel is now considered safe for public use. Dudek’s work began with a comprehensive analysis of the site’s geography, hydrology, history, and vegetation communities to inform a restoration approach that balances ecological, recreational, and aesthetic goals. Key project elements include:
▪ Channel Restoration: Redesigning the artificial V-shaped channel to create a more natural stream morphology, incorporating native boulders, cobbles, and gravel to enhance aquatic habitat and stream aesthetics.
▪ Riparian and Wetland Planting: Developing a planting plan with regionally appropriate native species to stabilize soils, reduce erosion, and improve habitat for wildlife and pollinators. The plan includes strategies for invasive species management and long-term maintenance. ▪ Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis: Assessing perennial and stormwater flows, groundwater conditions, and flood recurrence to ensure the restored channel can accommodate both regular and peak flows while minimizing erosion.
▪ Public Access and Park Integration: Enhancing public access and visual connections to the creek, while coordinating restoration with existing park facilities and user needs. ▪ Environmental Compliance: Navigating permitting and environmental review, including consideration of potential cultural resources and residual contamination from historic mining.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 43

MARRIOTT MEADOWS PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN REFINEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Client: Auburn Area Recreation and Park District
Contract Value: $288,300
Period of Performance: 2020–2025
The 24-Acre Park project (Marriott Meadows) involved fitting recreational park facilities into an oak woodland on an undeveloped parcel owned by Auburn Recreation District (ARD) adjacent to Auburn Regional Park. The project proposed paved and earthen walking trails, large and small dog parks, an open turf area, a central plaza, splash pad, restroom, bocce ball courts, shade shelters with picnic tables, a wetland overlook, interpretive signage, a 20-car parking lot and entry road, and associated utilities. The majority of the site would remain in a largely natural state, consisting of oak woodlands with unpaved walking trails, a wetland, and open grassland area.

Dudek worked with ARD to prepare a revised Conceptual Plan for the park, an IS/MND and technical studies for biological and cultural resources, jurisdictional aquatic resources delineation, traffic study, noise, and air quality and greenhouse gas emissions analyses. Dudek also helped ARD obtain funding for development of construction documents, interpretive signage design, and project construction. Following receipt of Proposition 68 Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program funds, Dudek completed construction documents (currently at the 100% level of completion) and interpretive designs.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 44 Relevant 4Creeks Experience

TULE RIVER ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Client: Tule River Indian Tribe
Contract Value: $91,970
Period of Performance: February 2025-Ongoing
4Creeks, Inc. is providing CEQA compliance services for the Tule River Active Transportation Plan (ATP, a collaborative effort between the Tule River Tribe, TCAG, and the City of Porterville to improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity across the Reservation and surrounding areas. Our team is preparing the necessary environmental documentation— including an IS and supporting technical studies— to assess potential impacts related to biological and cultural resources, traffic, and noise. By integrating environmental considerations early in the planning process, we are helping ensure the ATP is both environmentally sound and eligible for future funding and implementation.

MILLBURN AVENUE AND DAKOTA AVENUE COMMUNITY PARK
Client Name: City of Fresno
Contract Value: $36,000
Period of Performance: June 2020–April 2021
4Creeks undertook the preparation of an IS/MND for the Milburn Avenue and Dakota Avenue Community Park project to comply with CEQA guidelines. The IS/MND addressed the environmental impacts associated with the development of a 4.5-acre neighborhood park, featuring amenities such as a multi-use field, playgrounds, water play area, picnic shelters, dog park, multi-use courts, and exercise areas. Subsequently, 4Creeks prepared an Addendum to the IS/MND to address modifications to the project description, which included improvements to North Milburn Avenue and West Dakota Avenue. The addendum ensured that these changes remained consistent with CEQA requirements and did not result in new or significantly greater environmental impacts than previously identified. This meticulous approach ensured regulatory compliance and provided the City of Fresno with the necessary documentation to proceed with the project confidently.

QUIGLY COMMUNITY PARK RECONSTRUCTION
Client Name: City of Fresno
Contract Value: $44,000
Period of Performance: August 2021–February 2022 (amendment pending) 4Creeks prepared an IS/MND for the City of Fresno’s Quigley Community Park Reconstruction Project, which modernized existing facilities and added new amenities such as a community center, sports courts, playgrounds, walking paths, and improved parking and pedestrian access. The team conducted comprehensive environmental analyses—including air quality modeling, biological and cultural resource assessments, and evaluations of noise, hydrology, and public services—in accordance with CEQA standards. The IS/MND identified mitigation measures to address potential biological, cultural, and air quality impacts, ensuring that, with implementation, all potential effects were reduced to less-than-significant levels.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 45 F. Compensation – Provided Separately
Per the RFP, our cost proposal has been provided in a separate sealed envelope.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 46

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 47 G. Conflict of Interest
Dudek is not aware of any financial, business or other relationship with the City or any member of the City staff that may have an impact on the outcome of the project. Nor do we have any current clients with a financial impact on the outcome of this project.

Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 48

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 49 H. Requested Modifications to the City’s
Professional Services Agreement
Dudek respectfully requests the following modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement:

III. COMPENSATION
B. Payment of Compensation: The CONSULTANT shall be compensated according to the progress payment schedule set forth in Exhibit “D”. upon completion of percentage of each noted phase. The CONSULTANT shall be paid no later than thirty (30) days following submission of a written, verified billing to the CITY. Said billing shall include the percentage of each task completed to date and since the date of the preceding billing, if any.

V. TERMINATION
B. Termination of Agreement for Cause: The CITY may by written notice to the CONSULTANT specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement in any of the following circumstances:

1. If the CONSULTANT fails to perform the services called for by this Agreement within time(s) specified herein or any extension thereof; or

2. If the CONSULTANT fails to make progress under this Agreement as to endanger performance of this Agreement in accordance with its terms and does not correct such failure within a period of ten (10) days (or longer period as the CITY may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from the CITY specifying such failure.

3. In addition, CONSULTANT may by written notice to the CITY specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination, terminate this Agreement if CITY fails to pay CONSULTANT’s invoices within the time specified herein.

4. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
B. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including reasonable legal Consultant’s fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any quat attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or City for which Consultant is legally liable, including, but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Consultant.

C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any professional liability claim or lawsuit, this indemnity does not include providing the primary defense of City, provided, however, Consultant shall Request for Proposal #26-827: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan 50 be responsible for City’s defense costs to the extent such costs are incurred as a result of Consultant’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct.

C.D. Without limiting CITY’s right to indemnification, it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall secure prior to commencing any activities under this Agreement, and maintain during the term of this Agreement, insurance coverage as follows…
Appendix A
Resumes

1 Ed Armstrong, RLA, QSD/QSP

SENIOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Ed Armstrong (ED ARM-strong; he/him) is a senior habitat restoration specialist and licensed landscape architect with expertise in park, open space/trail, and natural systems planning and design responsive of today's water conservation challenges. Mr. Armstrong has 26 years of experience in planning and design for wetland, stream, and riparian restoration projects; watershed and creek systems; regional parks, trails, and open space systems; and streetscapes, with a focus on enhancing public use while preserving and restoring natural habitat. Mr. Armstrong has been involved in all phases of project development, including site assessment, conceptual design, master planning, construction drawings, cost estimates, technical specifications, construction assistance, phasing, and community outreach.

Mr. Armstrong is experienced with the permitting process, including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other agency permits, and he has drafted operations and management plans for preserves that contain preserved, mitigated, or restored resources. Mr. Armstrong’s extensive experience in application of computeraided design (CAD), geographic information system (GIS), and 3D modeling software allows him to employ a variety of tools to understand important site factors. With 10 years’ experience in engineering for near-earth orbit and geosynchronous satellites and groundstation networks, Mr. Armstrong is able to utilize a systems approach when solving complex problems.

Relevant Previous Experience
Rohr Park Master Plan, City of Chula Vista, Chula Vista, California. Currently preparing a master plan to guide improvements to Rohr Park in the City of Chula Vista, including strengthening linkages to regional trails, enhancing native vegetation and habitat within the park, and improving park amenities for lesser served groups. Project includes public workshops and pop-up events, development of alternative and preferred improvement plans, cost estimates for implementation of proposed improvements, and recommendations for maintenance and management. To date, Dudek has conducted site assessments, prepared an existing conditions, opportunities and constraints memorandum, conducted four of six public workshops and prepared alternative plans and a preferred plan for park improvements to meet the City’s needs over the next 10 years. Currently working on the draft version of the Master Plan.

Santa Maria Creek Greenway, County of San Deigo, Ramona, California. Project Manager and landscape architect for development of an Implementation Plan for the Santa Maria Creek Greenway in the City of Ramona. Dudek’s team reviewed background information, conducted site assessments, prepared an opportunities and constraints assessment, developed alternative alignments and cost estimates, and prepared the Implementation Plan for approximately 2.5 miles of unpaved multi-user trail. The Implementation Plan provides direction for parcel acquisition and trail development by prioritized segments and includes sections on existing conditions, Education
University of Oregon
Master of Landscape
Architecture, 1995
Bachelor of Landscape
Architecture, 1994
University of California,
Davis
BS, Physics, 1985
Certifications
CA, Landscape Architect,
No. 4870
OR, Landscape Architect,
No. 717
VA, Landscape Architect,
No. 2236
QSD/QSP, No. 24900
2 opportunities and constraints, public outreach, alternative alignments and priority segments, design guidelines, implementation and funding, and maintenance and management.

Holliday Rock Specific Plan, Claremont, California. Developed landscape regulations and recommendations and prepared a conceptual landscape plan for the Holliday Rock planned development in Claremont. Plan included a pedestrian promenade; open space park with amphitheater, plaza and trails; street landscaping; entry signage; and regulations for parking lot shading, water efficiency, native and drought-tolerant plant lists, and related elements.

Anderson River Park, City of Anderson, California. Analyzed existing facilities and developed a master plan for improvements to a 440-acre park based on City and community desires. Improvements included replacement of aging park facilities, new baseball and soccer fields, parking lots, new restroom/concession buildings, a challenge play area, a gazebo, a water play area, picnic shelters, and a new secondary park entrance with an equestrian parking lot. Facilitated the initial public meeting to elicit needs and desires from the community.

Fanita Ranch Trails Master Plan, HomeFed Fanita Rancho, Santee, California. Developed the Fanita Ranch Trails Master Plan for trails in a new community development. Plan focused on preservation and enhancement of trails within the nature preserves and included a summary of existing conditions, recommendations for closures and realignment of existing trails, measures to preserve natural resources, maintenance practices, and design guidelines.

Augustin Bernal Mountain Bike Trail, City of Pleasanton, California. Conducted site assessments; recorded existing trail alignment, opportunities, and constraints using GPS; developed a preliminary alignment plan and construction documents; and performed construction observation for a technical downhill mountain bike trail in the City of Pleasanton. Plans and specifications detailed existing trail improvements, realignments, closures of highly erosive or impactful trail segments, and installation of signage and technical mountain bike features.

Soledad Water Reclamation Facility Wetland Feasibility Study, City of Soledad, California. Developed a feasibility study for creating wetlands and recreation facilities in the City’s inactive Rapid Infiltration Basins. Following site analysis and hydrologic modeling for infiltration rates, developed two alternative designs for seasonal and perennial emergent wetlands, open-water ponds, and associated recreational facilities such as trails, a boardwalk, wildlife observation decks, parking lots, picnic areas and interpretive signage. Study included detail cost estimates for both alternatives as well as maintenance projections.

Marriott Meadows Park, Auburn Area Recreation and Park District, Auburn, California. Managed the project team to develop two conceptual plan alternatives, a preferred conceptual plan, a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) mitigated negative declaration, and construction documents for an expansion to Regional Park for the Auburn Area Recreation and Park District. The final, approved plan includes parking for approximately 40 vehicles, an entry road with parallel parking, a play structure and spray facility, a native plant demonstration garden, shade shelters, a four-stall restroom, a multipurpose turf area, a dog park with separate large- and small-dog areas, and walking trails.

Riolo Vineyard Parks, Homes by Towne, Placer County, California. Prepared conceptual plans and construction documents for two parks in the Glen Willow community within the Riolo Vineyards development. The largest of these neighborhood parks encompasses 5 acres and includes a low-water-use demonstration garden with LID swales, a softball field, a U12 soccer field, a plaza area with a snack bar/restroom building, youth and tot play areas, and shade shelters. The second park includes a shade shelter, a restroom, a deck overlooking Dry Creek, youth and tot play areas, and pedestrian and bike trails. 1 Nick Deyo, PLA

SENIOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND HABITAT RESTORATION SPECIALIST Nick Deyo is a professional landscape architect with 14 years of experience who holds degrees in both biology and landscape architecture. He has successfully combined these two fields over the course of his career. Nicholas has designed restoration and mitigation plans for wetland, riparian, and upland projects across the West. In addition to natural systems, Nicholas has designed and overseen construction for urban plazas, trail systems, and commercialscale planting and irrigation projects. At the planning scale, Nick has experience in master plan development for campuses and institutions and has developed conservation plans for county government and non-profit organizations. He is an expert at using GIS/CAD software to effectively convey planning and design intent across multiple project scales.

Relevant Previous Experience
Memorial Park Magenta Drain Restoration, City of Grass Valley, CA, 2024- Present. Nick is leading a project to help the City restore Magenta Drain within Memorial Park and provide public access to this unique feature. Historically, Magenta Drain received contaminated wastewater from the Empire Mine.

Years of reclamation work have removed mine waste from water in the creek and surrounding soils. Nick is developing plans that will restore native species, improve flood capacity and creek morphology, remove barrier fences, and provide trails and creek access features to the site. This project will improve ecological function while returning access to water in an important public park.

Davis Putah Creek Wetland Park, City of Davis & UC Davis, CA, 2023-2024.

Nick served as project manager and worked closely with UC Davis and the City of Davis on a multi-benefit project to restore a 32-acre parcel along the South Fork of Putah Creek. Nick addressed difficult ecological and engineering constraints to create a design that met restoration goals, which included improving habitat for juvenile salmon, creating off-channel wetland areas, and expanding riparian forest.

The project will include park facilities and a trail system, allowing for recreational use and wildlife viewing. Nick led intensive public outreach efforts and guided the project through conceptual design.

Camp Pollock Improved River Access Features. Sacramento Valley Conservancy, Sacramento, CA, 2022–2024.

Nick served as lead landscape architect and project manager. He helped the Sacramento Valley Conservancy secure $3.5 million in grant money through the American River and Community Reinvestment State Fund to improve river access at a key open space property along the northern bank of the American River. The design included a river observation platform and accessible river access trail, which will allow visitors of all ability levels to connect with the river. He coordinated a large team of engineers, resource experts, and permitting specialists to design a low maintenance and long-lasting project that limits impacts to sensitive resources and preserves the historic character of the site. The project is expected to be constructed in 2026.

Education
University of Michigan,
MLA, Landscape
Architecture, 2011
University of Montana,
BA, Biology,2023
Certifications
Professional Landscape
Architect, California
License No. 6463 &
Washington No.
20118403
Professional Affiliations
American Society of
Landscape Architects
California Society for
Ecological
2 River-Side Gateway Project Suite, City of Riverside Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department, CA, 2021-2024. Nick served as project manager and provided grant writing support to the City of Riverside, which was successful in securing 2.5 million dollars from the Coastal Conservancy to provide park master planning and environmental documentation for 9 park sites along the Santa Ana River. Once completed, this network of parks will provide residents, many from disadvantaged communities, access to the river and connections to its natural systems while restoring these habitats. The projects will also improve trail connections to the Santa Ana River Greenway, strengthening the network of non-motorized travel in the region.

Boca Meadows Restoration, Truckee River Watershed Counsil, 2024-Present. Nick is leading the restoration design of an important meadow ecosystem in the Tahoe National Forest near Boca Reservoir. The project will realign an access road to avoid sensitive wetland habitats and restore over 10 acres of wet meadow. The road and restoration design require close coordination with Tahoe National Forest and Nevada County Staff to ensure the designs meet County and Forest Service design standards and maintenance requirements.

Santa Ana River Tributary Habitat Restoration Projects, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, CA, 2016– 2024. Nick served as the lead landscape architect for a multidisciplinary team that developed habitat mitigation plans for four tributaries of the Santa Ana River to provide habitat for the threatened Santa Ana sucker. The projects will provide over 3 miles of enhanced/created channel and 50 acres of riparian habitat. Nick carried project designs from concept plans through final construction documents, which included grading plans, instream habitat structures, fish passage friendly culverts, revegetation plans, irrigation plans, and construction details. Two of the four tributaries will be constructed in 2025.

Quartermaster Reach Restoration: Tidal Marsh Restoration in an Urban Environment, Presidio Trust/National Park Service, CA, 2017–2021. Nick provided landscape architecture expertise on this multi-benefit restoration and recreation/interpretive project. The project restored a tidally influenced marsh between two water features—Crissy Field Marsh and an upstream riparian corridor called Thompson Reach, within the Presidio of San Francisco. The project daylighted an underground pipe and designed a marsh transition channel and a functioning tidal marsh with approximately 9.5 acres of new habitat. The restored tidal marsh offered the dual benefit of providing habitat for threatened species while buffering the impacts of coastal flooding caused by climate change. The project included trails and interpretive features to allow access to and educate about the restored marsh habitat. Project construction was completed in 2021.

Urrutia Restoration, Lower American River Conceptual Feasibility Study, Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, CA, 2020. Nick provided landscape architecture expertise to determine the feasibility of constructing a multibenefit, 130-acre habitat mitigation and flood control project north of downtown Sacramento. The conceptual design focused on creating shaded riverine aquatic habitat to benefit salmonid fish species and maximizing riparian habitat for other threatened species. Designs also included recreation features such as trails, vista points, and interpretive nodes. Nick provided planting plans and schedules, illustrative graphics, trail/interpretive designs, and detailed cost estimates.

Rock Bottom Ranch Trail System, Aspen Center for Environmental Studies, Colorado, 2014–2015. Nick designed an interpretive trail system featuring 4,000 linear feet of trail, 15 seating areas, a picnic area, six educational nodes, and a playground. He drafted construction documents using AutoCAD software. He also provided a cost estimate and helped the client submit the project for bid. 1 John Zanzi, PLA

SENIOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, QA/QC REVIEW
John Zanzi (JON ZAN-zee; he/him) is a landscape architect with 41 years’ professional experience throughout California and the western United States.

He specializes in planning and design for recreation and public access projects, such as park facilities and trails; and ecosystem restoration and native plant revegetation, including riparian system and wetland mitigation, water-quality improvement, erosion control and biotechnical slope stabilization.

Mr. Zanzi’s expertise includes preparing design and construction documents (plans and specifications), and cost estimates as well as conducting value engineering. He has extensive knowledge and experience in conducting field design and adaptive management, providing construction direction and oversight, and maintaining construction records, including as-built drawings.

Mr. Zanzi applies his direct hands-on and practical construction, maintenance, and post-construction monitoring experience to his projects.

Project Experience
Santa Maria Creek Greenway, County of San Deigo, Ramona, California.

Assisted with an Implementation Plan for approximately 2.5 miles of unpaved multi-user trail. Provided technical input for the Implementation and Funding, and Maintenance and Management chapters. Prepared order-of-magnitude estimates of probable cost based on the preliminary trail alignments and proposed site improvements and amenities.

Water Reclamation Facility Feasibility Report and Creation of Wetlands and Recreational Enhancements, City of Soledad, California. Prepared construction cost estimates for alternatives, and provided quality-assurance review for the feasibility of creating wetlands and recreational enhancements, including parking, trails, picnic areas, overlooks, signage, a restroom, a boardwalk, and a fishing pier.

Dartmouth Gulch Park Restoration and Public Access Preliminary Design, City of Denver Department of Parks and Recreation, Denver, Colorado. Conducted a high-level design study of alternatives for site improvements for a 3- acre site. Conducted opportunities and constraints, discussed potential site improvements and site amenity programming, and prepared two draft landscape design plan conceptual alternatives. Prepared preliminary orderof-magnitude cost estimates including planning, permitting, and construction implementation costs.

Marriott Meadows 24-Acre Park, Auburn Recreational Park District, Auburn, California. Quality-assurance review and prepared construction cost estimates for a preferred conceptual plan, and prepared construction documents.

The plan included a small parking lot, an entry road with parallel parking, a play structure, a spray facility, a native plant demonstration garden, shade shelters, a restroom, a multipurpose turf area, a dog park, and walking trails.

Education
University of California,
Davis
BS, Landscape
Architecture, 1985
Certifications
Professional Landscape
Architect (RLA), CA No.
2933, NV No. 481, WA
No. 763, AZ No. 31365,
CO No. 1628
Council of Landscape
Architectural Registration
Boards (CLARB),
No. 5344
2 Tilden Nature Area Pond Restoration, NCE/East Bay Regional Park District, Berkeley, California. Led design and prepared construction documents addressing the native revegetation and trails for an interpretive pond area. The plans and specifications addressed non-native plant treatments, native revegetation, temporary irrigation (to facilitate plant establishment), and details for trails, a boardwalk, an observation deck, an amphitheater, habitat features, signs and site amenities. Provided bid and construction assistance, including review of submittals and RFIs, and conducted observations of the landscape and revegetation installation.

Saratoga Creek Restoration Design and Monitoring Plan, Santa Clara Valley Water District, Saratoga, California.

Project manager and landscape architect of record for restoration design and monitoring planning for approximate 2 acres of riparian restoration. Prepared detailed mitigation/restoration planting and irrigation designs and plans, specifications, and cost estimates for project bidding and construction, and oversaw preparation of a Restoration, Mitigation, and Monitoring Plan that describes the basis for the design for review by permitting agencies.

Napa Creek Restoration Project, ACOE/MGE Engineering, Napa, California. Design of more than 3,000 linear feet of bank stabilization planting supported by temporary irrigation. Revegetation approaches included site preparation, temporary irrigation, native plant revegetation, and plant establishment. Revegetation established diverse species, enhanced shaded riverine aquatic habitat, stabilized the creek, and provided erosion control.

The Parkway at Blue Ravine, The Parkway Venture, Folsom, California. The project included design and implementation of a 3-mile-long floodplain restoration and a passive recreation parkway and floodplain restoration project, which included trails and interpretive areas and wetlands, riparian, and oak woodland restoration.

Agua Hedionda South Shore Specific Plan, Caruso Affiliated, Carlsbad, California. Prepared preliminary concept plans and cost estimates for more than 155 acres of agricultural and natural resource areas. The plans prescribed preliminary concepts for public access, low-cost visitor uses, trails, interpretation and overlooks, native habitat restoration, and preservation of existing historic agriculture areas and biological resources.

Sutter’s Landing Park Planning, Friends of Sutter’s Landing/City of Sacramento, California. Planning and design assistance for park improvements and cost estimates for a 400-acre park adjacent to the American River.

Easton Trail and Park Planning, Aerojet General Corporation, Sacramento County, California. Trail and park preliminary design, presentation drawings, a recreation amenities program and cost estimates for more than 400 acres of open space, including 17 neighborhood and pocket park sites.

River Park Open-Space, Richland Planned Communities, West Sacramento, California. Planning, design, and preparation of preliminary concepts and cost estimates for an open-space creek corridor and regional park, including trails and amenities, a boardwalk with viewing overlooks and interpretive exhibits, an outdoor amphitheater, multiuse sports fields, basketball and tennis courts, and a playground.

Quality-Assurance and Design-Review Projects, EDAW, Various Locations, California. From 2003–2011, provided third-party design review for quality assurance of construction documents (i.e., plans and specifications) prepared by branch offices. Project types included habitat restoration and native plant revegetation; park, recreation, and open-space design; urban design and hardscape; and residential development.

Landscape Plan Check Review, City of Elk Grove, California. Provided third-party (peer) plan-check review of landscape plans for commercial and residential development and other projects within City limits prepared by other landscape architects for conformance to the City’s water-efficient landscape requirements; industry standards; and public health, safety, and welfare.
1 Meredith Branstad, PLA

HABITAT RESTORATIONIST
Meredith Branstad (MAIR-eh-dith BRAN-stad; she/her) is a habitat restorationist with 23 years’ professional experience as a landscape architect and biologist specializing in balancing human and environmental needs. She has experience developing both public and private projects, including parks, trails, and streetscapes and commercial, residential, and utility projects.

Meredith has managed and led multidisciplinary teams through all phases of planning and design, including conceptual planning and construction document preparation, construction assistance and monitoring, recreation master planning, public outreach and meeting facilitation, habitat restoration design and success monitoring, wetland delineations, general and focused biological surveys, tree surveys and assessments, regulatory permit applications, grant writing, public education, and visual impact assessments.

Project Experience
Lion Canyon Habitat Mitigation, Newhall Land, Santa Clarita, California. Prepared landscape construction documents for restoration of 7.6 acres of riparian, oak woodland, and sagebrush scrub habitats. Plans included site preparation, planting, temporary irrigation, and sheet specifications. Project will be installed in two phases beginning in winter 2024 and ending in fall 2025. (2024) Joseph D. Grant Park Trails Expansion, County of Santa Clara, California. Leading the design team developing construction documents for over 2.5 miles of new hiking trails, group and individual backpack camp sites, a vault-toilet restroom, and site access road. Plans are underway and will include grading and layout plans and appropriate details. (2025–Present)
Viking Ranch Restoration, United States Gypsum Company, San Diego County, California. Prepared landscape construction documents for restoration of a 220-acre braided channel floodplain and scrub habitat in the Sonoran Desert of northeastern San Diego County. The plans include site preparation, grading, planting, and specifications for 10 years of maintenance. Construction is anticipated in 2025. (2024–present)
Arana Gulch Restoration, Consor Engineering, Santa Cruz, California. Served as lead landscape architect for a 1-acre habitat restoration project that includes seasonal wetland, riparian woodland, and upland woodland habitats. Developed construction documents for installation and 5 years of post-construction success monitoring and helped coordinate contract growing of plant materials at a local nursery. Providing construction support for construction, which was completed in October 2025. (2024-2025) Education
University of California,
Davis
BS, Landscape
Architecture, 2002
University of California,
Davis
BS, Wildlife, Fish,
and Conservation Biology,
2002
Certifications
Professional Landscape
Architect, CA No. 5122;
NV No. 803
Certified Arborist
No. WE-6727A and Tree
Risk Assessment
Qualification (TRAQ)
Professional Affiliations
American Society of
Landscape Architects,
California Sierra Chapter
Trustee
International Society of
Arboriculture
Council of Educators in
Landscape Architecture
2 Relevant Previous Experience
Foothill Associates/HELIX Environmental Planning
South Fork Preserve, City of Davis, California. Managed development and fabrication of 10 interpretive signs to be installed along existing trails and overlooks in the South Fork Preserve. This included coordination with the City’s open space and habitat committee and the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation.

Hidden Falls Regional Park Expansion and Twilight Ride Parking Area, Placer County, California. Served as project manager for development of conceptual plans and construction documents for a new regional trail access point.

The 52-acre project includes parking for automobiles and horse trailers, a restroom, ranger station, and trailhead amenities and is funded by a Recreation Trails and Greenways Grant. Facilitated an on-site public meeting, completed supplemental technical studies and environmental permitting, and provided preliminary construction support. The work was completed for Placer County, which is also the owner.

Interpretive Signs, Various Locations, Placer County, California. Served as project manager for development of interpretive signs at recreation facilities in Placer County, including Griffith Quarry Park, Hidden Falls Regional Park, the Gold Rush Museum, and Towle Trail.

Chili Bar Park Feasibility Study, El Dorado County, California. Served as project manager for a recreation feasibility study of a 6.5-acre river access point in El Dorado County. Conducted the site assessment and public outreach process, including in-person and virtual meetings; developed three alternative concepts for redevelopment of the site; and conducted the feasibility assessment of each alternative. The final report included implementation cost estimates and a financial analysis of the return on investment of each alternative.

District56 Nature Area, City of Elk Grove, California. Served as principal landscape architect and project manager for the design and construction assistance of a more than 30-acre park and open space area as the second phase of development for the City’s Civic Center. The project included development of a 4.5-acre perennial pond, custom-designed play area, event lawn, picnic areas, fitness court, walking and biking trails, native grassland restoration, oak tree mitigation, interpretive signs, and the preservation of a historic silo and pistachio orchard.

Additionally, completion of portions of Phase 1, including the parking lot expansions, infrastructure for a new solar array, and renovations for the City’s Holiday Tree, were included in the project. Managed a tree survey and prepared a mitigation plan to facilitate permit authorizations from the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Mahany Park Open Space Multi-Use Trail Feasibility Study, City of Roseville, California. Served as project manager for a multi-use trail feasibility study in the City of Roseville. Managed the biological constraints and arborists survey of the site, public outreach program, and development of opportunities and constraints analysis for the site; coordinated with City staff, local utilities, and regulatory agencies; and provided senior review of all documents.

Lower Laguna Creek Open Space Trail, TY Lin, City of Elk Grove, California. Served as project manager for the planning and environmental review process of more than 1-mile trail segment through existing open space preserves in the City of Elk Grove. This included a wetland delineation; tree survey; conceptual design of trails, entry nodes, rest areas, and an outdoor education center; preparation of the Natural Environment Study; preparation of the IS/MND; and a public outreach meeting. 1 Russell Sweet

BIOLOGY
Russell Sweet is a biologist with 25 years’ experience working with specialstatus and endangered species throughout California, with an emphasis on species in the Central Valley. Russell is responsible for biological survey data collection and plant and animal species identification, with an emphasis on rare, threatened, endangered, and sensitive species and vegetative communities. He has conducted numerous common and special-status species surveys and habitat impact analyses in Kern, Kings, Tulare, Fresno, Merced, Stanislaus, San Bernardino, Orange, Riverside, Inyo, and Los Angeles Counties, and performed focused State and Federal candidate, threatened and endangered species throughout California.

Russell has written numerous environmental impact reports (EIRs), environmental impact statements (EISs), biological assessments (BAs), and natural environment studies in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Russell’s project management experience includes overseeing budgets and personnel, coordinating schedules, and liaising with agencies, such as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

Relevant Project Experience
Development
Landfill HCP Implementation, County of Tulare, California. As lead biologist and USFWS-approved San Joaquin kit fox surveyor, conducted track plate/scent station, camera station, and spotlighting for San Joaquin kit fox. Conducted additional surveys for burrowing owl. Surveys were conducted according to protocol measures approved by USFWS, CDFW, and a habitat conservation plan.

Kern County Sports Park EIR, County of Kern, California. As lead biologist, prepared the biological resources section of the Kern County Sports Park EIR for residential development. Conducted and evaluated BAs performed by contracted employees, as well as the potential impacts to special-status flora and fauna inhabiting the project area and vicinity.

Tejon Mountain Village, Tejon Ranch Company, County of Kern, California. As lead biologist, managed and conducted jurisdictional delineations for the Tejon Mountain Village development in the City of Lebec. Analyzed 141 stream segments in the Castac Lake Watershed using hydrogeomorphic methodologies functional assessment results.

Education
California State University,
Bakersfield
BS, Biology, 1999
Certifications
CDFW SCP #221230002-
Kangaroo Rat Species
USFWS 10(a)(1(a)
#PER0046430-Kangaroo
Rat Species
CDFW Plant Voucher
Permit # 2081(a)-22-095-V
CDFW, Metropolitan
Bakersfield HCP
Incidental Take Permit
approved San Joaquin kit
fox surveyor
Desert Tortoise Council
10th Annual Surveying,
Monitoring, and Handling
Techniques Certificate,
2001
Professional Affiliations
Wildlife Society, Western
Section
California Native Plant
Society, Kern
County Chapter Training
2 Energy
Western San Joaquin Valley Energy Project, Tulare, Fresno and Kern Counties, California. Mr. Sweet conducted special-status species plant and wildlife surveys throughout areas proposed for future development as well as potential mitigation lands for a proposed Habitat Conservation Plan in Tulare, Fresno and Kern Counties.

Pedestrian surveys were conducted following agency approved protocols. Mr. Sweet was the lead biologist responsible for the client liaison, scheduling, reporting and qa/qc of data.

San Joaquin Valley Road Betterment for the Tulare River Bore, Southern California Gas Company, County of Tulare, California. As lead biologist, conducted special-status species, common species, nesting bird, and habitat surveys prior to project implementation. Conducted bird surveys for potential nesting cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) and barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) under the Tulare River Bridge on three separate visits prior to pipeline bore. Observed numerous nests for both cliff swallow (5) and barn swallow (10) species. As lead monitor during bore project, monitored bird activity during construction.

Transportation
California Highspeed Rail, Dragados Flatiron Joint Venture, Tulare, Kings and Fresno Counties, California. Mr.

Sweet is a Designated Biologist for SJKF and SWHA for Construction Package 2-3. Approximately 66-miles of the California High Speed Rail Project (CHSR. Mr. Sweet has conducted and reviewed biological surveys, conducted focused surveys for special-status plants and wildlife, construction reporting and review, monthly/annual reporting, and reviews implementation of environmental commitments for consistency for permits. He is also responsible for construction monitoring tasks that include preconstruction sweeps, monitoring, avoidance and minimization measures and permit conditions.

SR-99/Cartmill Avenue Overpass Expansion Project, City of Tulare in Conjunction with Caltrans, County of Tulare, California. As biologist and USFWS-approved San Joaquin kit fox surveyor, provided biological resources services for the expansion of north- and southbound ramps from Cartmill Avenue to SR-99, in addition to the expansion of Cartmill Avenue from two lanes to four lanes over SR-99. Conducted biological pre-construction surveys for San Joaquin kit fox, burrowing owl, and nesting birds. Monitored identified San Joaquin kit fox dens for 3 consecutive nights using tracking medium spread at the den entrance. No occupied dens were observed. Conducted burrowing owl focus surveys at potential burrows for 4 days in accordance with CDFW burrowing owl protocols.

Conducted environmental awareness training for all personnel prior to work and ongoing as work continued.

Water/Wastewater
McFarland Wastewater Treatment Plant, City of McFarland, California. Served as lead biologist. Conducted biological constraints analysis for the expansion of the wastewater treatment plant. Performed surveys for nesting birds, specialstatus plants, and San Joaquin kit fox. Conducted threatened and endangered species training and surveys prior to ground-disturbing activities. Monitored construction efforts in compliance with CDFW and USFWS regulations.

Visalia Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, City of Visalia, California. As lead biologist, conducted biological constraints analysis for the expansion of the wastewater treatment plant. Performed surveys for nesting birds, special-status plants, burrowing owl, and San Joaquin kit fox. Surveys were conducted in various habitats, such as agricultural fields, orchards, open space, and urban settings.

Relevant Previous Experience
▪ ICF International, Lead Biologist, Bakersfield, California, August 2008–July 2015 ▪ Ram Environmental Engineering, Biologist, Bakersfield, California, June 2008–August 2008 3 ▪ Impact Sciences Inc. Biologist/Project Manager, Bakersfield, California, September 2006–June 2008 ▪ Quad Knopf Inc. Associate Senior Environmental Scientist/Biologist, Bakersfield, California, March 2000– September 2006
Conference Presentations
▪ “Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard.” 2007, 2009, 2013, 2016. Workshop at The Wildlife Society. Served as Field Exercise Instructor, Level II Surveyor.

Specialized Training
▪ Vegetation Mapping Workshop, California Native Plant Society, 2017 ▪ Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni) Training, The Wildlife Society, Sacramento-Shasta Chapter, 2014 ▪ Rare Pond Species Survey Techniques Workshop, California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense), Western Pond Turtle (Actinemys marmorata), California Red-Legged Frog (Rana draytonii), Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation and The Wildlife Project, 2013
▪ Ecology and Conservation of California Bats, San Francisco State University, Sierra Nevada Field Campus, 2012
▪ Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Workshop Certificate, Southern Sierra Research Station, 2008 ▪ New Zealand Mud Snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) Workshop, Santa Monica Baykeeper, 2007 ▪ Wetland Delineation and Management, Wetland Training Institute, 2007 and 2022 ▪ Habitat Enhancement and Management for Waterfowl Areas, University of California, Davis, 2004 ▪ Habitat Conservation Planning, University of California, Davis, 2002 ▪ Endangered Species Regulation and Protection, University of California, Davis, 2002 ▪ Clean Water Act, Section 404, Nationwide, and Other Specialized Permits (University of California, Davis, 2005) 1 Eric Hanson

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MANAGER
Eric Hanson is an environmental compliance manager with 18 years’ experience in environmental planning, regulatory permitting, environmental compliance, project management, and field biology in Southern and central California. Eric has established relationships with resource agency staff across Southern and central California and local/state transportation agency staff in Los Angeles. He has managed multiple California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act documents and has successfully applied for, negotiated, and secured permit packages for multiple complex projects, emphasizing bridge design, water conveyance, and hydrology in relation to aquatic flora and fauna impacts. Eric also serves as a project manager, focused on design–build construction projects with regulatory complications and projects requiring high levels of engagement from interested parties.

In his role as environmental compliance manager, Eric reviews and provides quality control for technical and survey reports for cultural resources, aesthetics, air quality, hazardous waste, and natural resources. He has extensive experience interacting with municipal and resource agencies, as well as the public. Eric works with multiple interested parties to find acceptable design alternatives during the response-to-comment process, collaborating with design and construction engineers as well as general construction contractors to help clients build a project within scope and cost, while complying with permit conditions and minimization measures.

Most Recently, Eric was the Environmental Compliance Manager for High Speed Rail (HSR) Construction Package 2/3. From 2018 to 2022, he served in an extension of staff role to the Los Angeles County Public Works (LAPW) Stormwater Engineering Division, providing guidance and recommendations on regulatory permitting strategies, mitigation options, as well as permit compliance during construction. He has also served in an part time extension of staff role for the Southern and Central Divisions of the Department of Water Resources, managing regulatory permitting packages and CEQA documents for Operation and Management and capital improvement plan projects with a high potential to impact natural resources. The extension of staff roles with two public agencies focused on water infrastructure provided Eric with unique experience related to municipal stormwater water, storage, and water conveyance projects. He has also worked on numerous California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) managed local assistance projects in Los Angeles and Ventura Counties.

Eric is familiar with the implementation of the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Pilot Program to the transition to the current memorandum of understanding with the Federal Highway Administration. He also has experience with Caltrans/State Historic Preservation Office 2014 Programmatic Agreement and 106 Screening Memo.

Education
California State University,
Northridge
MPA, Public Policy
Administration, 2011
CSU Channel Islands
BS, Environmental
Science Resource
Management, 2007
Certifications
CDFW Certified First
Responder and Incident
Commander
Desert Tortoise Surveying,
Monitoring and Handling
Workshop
OSHA 40-Hour

HAZWOPER
FEMA ICS 100,200,700.

RAPID Streambed
Assessment (Riparian
Module)
Wetlands Training
Institute: Basic and
Advanced Wetlands
Delineation
2 Project Experience
Confidential Project, Private Energy Client, Fresno County, California. Served as the Project Manager for a project currently under an NDA. Completed conditional use permit extension and managed team to produce tech studies and CEQA documentation to support conversion from solar production to a battery energy storage system. (2023–2024) Project Manager, Lewis Management, Tulare County, California. Served as the Project Manager and natural resource tech specialist. Coordinated team to complete community impact analysis, as well as biological, hydrological, and cultural tech studies. Processed conditional use permit application and partnered with project design team to modify design and avoid the need for regulatory permits. (2022) Environmental Compliance for the San Gabriel Reservoir, LAPW, Angeles National Forest California. Served as the Project Manager and Environmental Compliance Manager for years 1 and 2 of a 5-year emergency sediment removal project in the reservoir. In addition to serving as Project Manager, worked closely with Public Works (PW) Stormwater Engineering Dams Group and Construction Division to implement environmental permit compliance during construction. Maintained ongoing communication with contractor and County Inspector to facilitate continuous construction during very limited work windows. Coordinated monitors, review and submittal of monitoring records/reports, and coordination with regulatory agencies. (2019–2022) Environmental Compliance and Regulatory Permitting Support for the Sierra Madre Debris Dam, LAPW, Sierra Madre, California. Served as extension of staff in the Stormwater Engineering Environmental Permitting and Compliance Unit (EPCU). Worked closely with PW Stormwater Engineering Dams Group and Construction Division to implement environmental permit compliance during construction. Coordinated monitors, review and submittal of monitoring records/reports and coordination with regulatory agencies. (2023) Environmental Compliance and Regulatory Permitting Support for the Santa Anita Dam, LAPW, Monrovia, California. Served as an extension of staff in Stormwater Engineering EPCU. Worked closely with PW Stormwater Engineering Dams Group and Construction Division to update and finalize permits based on final construction plans and implement environmental permit compliance during construction. Coordinated pre-construction surveys and reporting, construction monitors, review and submittal of monitoring records/reports and coordination with regulatory agencies. (2021–2022)
Environmental Compliance and Regulatory Permitting Support for Dry Reservoirs; LAPW; San Dimas and Glendora; California. Served as extension of staff in Stormwater Engineering EPCU. Lead the development of regulatory permitting strategy for vegetation removal at multiple facilities. Coordinated with Stormwater Engineering Admin to develop permitting strategy, timeline, and pursue mitigation opportunities. Calculated proposed impacts and completion or regulatory permit applications. (2019–2022) Environmental Compliance and Regulatory Permitting Support for Post-Fire Emergency Permitting, LAPW, Los Angeles County, California. Served as extension of staff in Stormwater EPCU. Assisted multiple divisions within PW with emergency permit applications and environmental clearance for emergency projects related to post-fire response. Conducted site assessments, pre-construction surveys and monitoring during construction. (2018–2020) Environmental Compliance and Regulatory Permitting Support for the Devil’s Gate Sediment Cleanout, LAPW, Pasadena, California. Served as extension of staff in Stormwater Engineering EPCU. Coordinated with Stormwater Engineering Sediment Management Group as well as PW Construction Division to implement regulatory agency permit requirements pre-construction. Assisted EPCU with multiple environmental compliance concerns including air quality, traffic, and natural resources. Coordinated with LAPW Admin and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to address compliance issues during construction and minimize project delays. (2019) 1 Laurie Grover, AICP

PLANNER
Laurie Grover (LOR-ee GRO-vher; she/her) is a planner with 14 years’ experience specializing in community and regional land use planning and public engagement. She offers a unique array of public sector experience focusing on long-range planning, public outreach, technical analyses, policy development, and grant writing and administration. Her multidisciplinary expertise includes a full range of planning efforts such as Regional, Area, General and Master Plans, resilience planning, and facilitating meaningful dialogue among interested parties.

For 4 years, Laurie served as the Treasurer for the California Planning Foundation, the nonprofit arm of the American Planning Association tasked with providing scholarships to planning students throughout the state.

Project Experience
Rohr Park and Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course Master Plan, City of Chula Vista, California. Serving as outreach lead, working to incorporate an innovative and interactive public engagement effort to solicit visioning, feedback, and input from the community on proposed improvements to the beloved community park. As part of this effort, we will have conducted three public workshops, five pop-up events, two online surveys, youth engagement, and a social media campaign to collect input. (2025 – Present) Buena Vista Creek Restoration Planning Project, City of Oceanside, California. Serving as outreach lead, implemented a successful public outreach campaign to solicit visioning input and feedback on the proposed design of a reach of the Buena Vista Creek. The outreach effort for this project was both interactive and educational and resulted in the adoption of a final design for an important segment of the region’s waterway. (2024-2025)
Public Engagement for Lake Avenue, City of Pasadena, California. Serving as project manager, oversees a public outreach program to educate and garner input on a stretch of Lake Avenue, a frequently trafficked stretch within the City. The outreach is geared toward educating the public of the future design and preparing business owners on what to anticipate in terms of project design. (2025- Present) Los Angeles County Metro Area Plan, County of Los Angeles, California. Serving as deputy project manager for the Los Angeles County Metro Area Plan development. Assisting the project manager with plan development including overall project management, goals and policy development, zoning updates, and interested party engagement.

The Metro Area Plan provides long-range planning guidance for seven unincorporated communities within the County of Los Angeles that have historically been underserved throughout their planning history. (2022–2024) Sphere of Influence/Annexation Reorganization, City of Indio, California. Serving as project manager, working with the City of Indio to prepare a reorganization application for submittal to the Riverside County Local Agency Education
San Diego State
University
MA, City Planning, 2012
University of California,
Berkeley
BA, Legal Studies, 2008
Certifications
American Institute of
Certified Planners (AICP)
Professional Affiliations
American Planning
Association
2 Formation Commission. Work includes a robust outreach and engagement campaign with a multitude of interested parties including landowners, utility providers, elected officials, and the general public. (2024 - Present) Comprehensive General Plan Update, City of Newport Beach, California. Serving as senior planner, helped lead the update of two elective General Plan Elements: the Arts and Culture Element and the Historical Resources Element. Helped to update and develop new policies to provide enhanced protection and promotion of these two elements within the City. (2024–Present)
San Bernardino County Council of Governments, San Bernardino County, California. Serving as senior planner, works closely with clients to provide on-call regional planning assistance. Project work has included research and implementation of a regional housing trust and working with member jurisdictions to acquire ProHousing designations, among other housing-relating services. (2022–Present) General Plan Update, City of Rialto, California. Serving as senior planner for the Land Use Element update of the City of Rialto’s General Plan. Led the public engagement for the plan and supported the City of Rialto in revamping the Land Use Element to include land use and zoning changes from the recently adopted Housing Element. (2023–2024)
Relevant Previous Experience
San Diego Forward: The 2019 Federal Regional Transportation Plan, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), California. Assisted the project manager with the Federal Regional Transportation Plan that ensures federal air quality conformity and preserves funding for the San Diego region’s infrastructure investments.

Assisted in chapter development, implementation action monitoring, and project cost and inflation updates. (2017–2019)
San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (2015–2019), SANDAG, California. Served as the assistant project manager and managed several phases and components of the plan, including costing and project phasing assessments, Sustainable Communities Strategy development, public outreach, state and federal plan compliance, and development of the goals, objectives, policies, programs, and implementation actions. The Regional Plan outlined billions of dollars in investment in the San Diego region over a 35-year planning horizon. (2013–2016)
Coordinated Plan (2014–2018), SANDAG, California. Served as a planner for the 2014–2018 Coordinated Plan (Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan), conducted market research and regional inventory on specialized transportation services, conducted regional public outreach, created information geographic information system (GIS) maps, and oversaw plan development. (2011–2013) Relevant Awards
Award of Excellence in Comprehensive Plan (Large Jurisdiction), San Diego Chapter of the American Planning Association, 2017, awarded for San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan.

Award of Merit in Comprehensive Plan (Large Jurisdiction), Los Angeles Chapter of the American Planning Association, 2024, awarded for County of Los Angeles Metro Area Plan. 1 Amanda Meroux, TE

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
Amanda Meroux (uh-MAN-duh meh-ROO; she/her) is a Traffic Engineer with 7 years’ experience, specializing in multimodal traffic modeling and site access analysis, along with the preparation of traffic impact analysis (TIA), technical documents, site access and roadway design, and traffic control plans. Ms.

Meroux has an educational backgroud in civil and environmental engineering, emphasizing air quality and transportation studies. She has experience working with TIA procedures, including vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis, data collection, cumulative project development, trip generation calculations, level of service (LOS) analysis for intersections and roadway segments, signal warrant analysis, construction traffic, internal circulation and access evaluation, and vehicle turning analysis. Additionally, she has experience modeling and simulating traffic during evacuation events, specifically related to wildland fires. She has experience with various types of transportation and design software, including PTV Vistro/Vissim, Synchro/SimTraffic, Traffix, AutoTurn, and Highway Capacity Software, as well as other technical programs, such as ArcGIS and AutoCAD.

Project Experience
Boca Meadow Habitat Restoration Project, Truckee River Watershed Council, Truckee, California. Prepared roadway grading plan sets and superelevation diagrams for a new roadway alignment for the Boca Meadow Habitat Restoration Project. This project involves the relocation of an existing dirt roadway within a currently degraded meadow system and adjacent tributary systems in the Boca watershed to support increased functionality, hydrologic connectivity and native vegetation/wildlife communities Byron Airport Development Program, County of Contra Costa, California. Prepared the TIA that identified potential traffic impacts associated with the development of light industrial, warehousing and logistics, commercial, and lowintensity office uses on the airport property. The TIA included arterial roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis under the Existing and Future Year (2040) conditions with and without the project as well as project access analyses, queuing analyses, and signal warrant evaluations to determine impacts and required mitigation measures.

Additionally, traffic impacts related to VMT were analyzed using the Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Model, and transportation demand management and VMT reduction measures were recommended.

Thousand Trails RV Resort Expansion Project, County of Santa Clara, California. Conducted a sight distance analysis at the project driveway for an RV resort expansion project located west of Uvas Road in Santa Clara County. The findings of the sight distance analysis were summarized in a memorandum, and an exhibit was provided identifying any potential sight distance constraints along Uvas Road and at the project driveway. 123 Independence Drive Project, City of Menlo Park, California. Assisted in the preparation of the TIA that identified potential traffic impacts associated with the redevelopment of an existing office park, including the demolition of 5 Education
University of California,
Davis
BS, Civil and
Environmental
Engineering, 2017
Certifications
Professional Traffic
Engineer, CA No. 3097
Professional Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
2 existing office and industrial buildings, and the construction of 116 townhomes and 316 rental apartments, for a total of 432 dwelling units. A VMT analysis was conducted for CEQA consistency, along with an operational LOS analysis using PTV Vistro (version 2022) software for Existing, Near Term, and Cumulative conditions with and without the project traffic at 15 intersections and 3 additional driveways for City General Plan consistency. Project driveways were also analyzed for queuing impacts using SimTraffic (version 10) simulation software. Additionally, all intersection improvements were identified where feasible, and conceptual geometric figures were drafted at impacted intersections to illustrate proposed improvements from the operational LOS analysis. 1005 O’Brien and 1230 Willow Road Life Sciences Project, City of Menlo Park, California. Assisted in the preparation of the TIA that identified potential traffic impacts associated with the demolition of approximately 90,631 square feet of existing office and light warehouse storage buildings and construction of two research and development buildings, a parking garage, and open space/pedestrian area. A VMT analysis was conducted for CEQA consistency, along with an operational LOS analysis using PTV Vistro (version 2023) software for Existing, Near Term, and Cumulative conditions with and without the project traffic at 12 intersections and 3 additional driveways for City General Plan consistency. Project driveways were also analyzed for queuing impacts using SimTraffic (version 11) simulation software. Additionally, all intersection improvements were identified where feasible, and conceptual geometric figures were drafted at impacted intersections to illustrate proposed improvements from the operational LOS analysis.

Avila by the Sea Fire Protection and Evacuation, Covelop, Avila Beach, San Luis Obispo, California. Conducted traffic simulation modeling using PTV Vissim software to analyze wildfire evacuation scenarios associated with the expansion of the Avila by the Sea Resort. Traffic simulation modeling included analysis of travel times throughout the Avila Beach region, including the Town of Avila Beach and surrounding communities, both with and without the addition of project traffic, under 14 evacuation scenarios.

Mesa Verde Specific Plan, Mesa Verde Owner LLC, Calimesa, California. Conducted traffic simulation modeling using PTV Vissim software to analyze wildfire evacuation scenarios associated with the development of the Mesa Verde Specific Plan (MVSP), an approximately 1,463-acre plan area in the City of Calimesa. The MVSP area includes up to 3,650 residential units, over 4 million square feet of proposed business park land uses, 300,000 square feet of commercial and mixed-use land uses, elementary schools, open space and public/private parks, utility infrastructure, and roadways. Traffic simulation modeling included analysis of travel times throughout the Specific Plan area and consideration of future planned projects and roadway infrastructure, both with and without the addition of project traffic, under 19 evacuation scenarios.

Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR, Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County, California. Assisted in the preparation of the transportation section of the EIR, providing an analysis of the transportation and traffic impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Facilities Master Plan (FMP) projects. FMP projects addressed in the Programmatic EIR (PEIR) would be located at various sites throughout the Sanitation District’s service area, which covers an approximately 479-square-mile area within the northwestern and central portions of Orange County, and include a series of approximately 83 Capital Improvement Program projects proposed to be implemented by the Sanitation District through 2040 to rehabilitate, replace, and optimize their existing facilities in continued service to residents and businesses within their service area. The transportation section analyzed the potential construction-related (temporary) transportation impacts and operations-and-maintenancerelated (permanent) transportation impacts related to four FMP project components. 1 Hunter Stetson, PLS

CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
Hunter Stetson has 12 years’ experience at many large firms surveying in the Bay Area and Northern California, performing a wide range of roles, from chainman to project surveyor. Hunter’s expertise spans topographic, American Land Title Association (ALTA)/National Society of Professional Surveyors (NSPS), boundary, construction staking, monitoring, control networks, level loops, corner records, monument preservation, and hydrographic surveys, handling both office and field scopes. Specializing in conventional survey techniques and newer technologies, such as remote sensing and terrestrial scanning, Hunter is proficient in programs such as Civil 3D (2012–2024), Trimble Business Center, Leica Infinity, Cyclone, Star Net, Mission Planner, HyPack, Drone Deploy, Pix4D, Bluebeam, and MS Office. Additionally, Hunter is experienced with drones, including the Wingtra Gen 2, DJI Phantom 4 Pro, and Seafloor Systems Hydrone, providing clients with a wide range of options to complete a survey.

Project Experience
ALTA/NSPS Survey, Confidential Client, San Juan Capistrano, California. Currently serving as surveyor of record for an ALTA/NSPS survey for a large real estate transaction supporting the renewable energy sector. This project posed significant challenges determining a boundary resolution due to the lack of mapping and inaccuracies in existing maps. A multitude of easement exhibits, both permanent and temporary in nature, were created to support the project development. Additional tasks included reviewing field data, researching previous surveys, and determining boundary resolutions.

GPS Survey Control Network, Confidential Client, Northern California. Served as surveyor to provide the client with a comprehensive GPS control network for 45,000 miles of transmission lines. These controls were utilized to register helicopter lidar data for an as-built survey. Managed and directed field teams to safely obtain GPS observations. Coordinated and made recommendations to the client on optimal control locations with consideration for location, environment, and safety.

Relevant Previous Experience
ALTA/NSPS Survey, Confidential Client, Menlo Park, California. Served as surveyor of record for an ALTA/NSPS survey of a multibuilding office complex in Menlo Park, California. Managed field crews and provided them with pre-calculations for boundary recovery, features that needed to be surveyed to comply with client-provided Table A list. Directed the field crew on control tie ins and safety procedures. Conducted site verification and provided ortho-rectified aerial imagery of the project site utilizing the Phantom 4 Pro.

Hinman Dam Topographic and Hydrographic Survey, California Department of General Services, Yountville, California. Served as surveyor of record for a 3.5-acre hydrographic survey of the reservoir bed. Provided uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry and conducted a traditional topographic survey.

Education
California State University,
Fresno
BS, Specialization
Geomatic Engineering,
2018
Certifications
California Professional
Land Surveyor (PLS),
No. 9737
FAA Remote Pilot
Certification, Part 107,
Small Unmanned Aircraft
1 Ryan Shupert

LAND SURVEYING AND GEOSPATIAL MANAGER
Ryan Shupert is a survey and geospatial manager with 7 years’ experience managing geospatial and land survey projects throughout North America and Hawai‘i for utility providers, renewable developers, due diligence firms, state and local municipalities. Ryan’s experience includes ALTA/NSPS surveys, civil design topographic surveys, utility surveys, transmission line surveys, easement exhibits, aerial lidar, and photogrammetry to support a wide range of projects and applications.

Project Experience
On-Call Surveying Services, Tulare County Resource Management Agency, Tulare County, California. Serving as project manager to provide the Agency with on-call surveying services throughout the county. Services shall include ALTA/NSPS surveys, boundary surveys, topographic surveys, aerial mapping including lidar and photogrammetry, vertical and horizontal control surveys, construction surveys, survey map and description review.

ALTA/NSPS Surveys for Community Solar Developments, Dimension Renewable Energy, Tulare County, California. Served as Project Manager for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys covering five separate community solar development sites across Tulare County, California. Each site required extensive boundary retracement, deed and easement research, and field monument recovery to establish accurate parcel limits and title exception mapping. Coordinated field crews, title research, and drafting teams to ensure all survey data met ALTA/NSPS standards and county requirements.

Water Infrastructure GIS Asset Mapping, June Lake Public Utility District, June Lake, California. Served as project manager for the real-time kinematic survey to map the location of the June Lake Public Utility District water infrastructure. Points were collected on the center of features, and digital photos were recorded for each feature, allowing for future asset management and creation of a comprehensive database for the water system. Dudek collected and stored the data in an Esri ArcGIS Online environment. The data were then formatted and exported to a file geodatabase. Dudek staff completed setup of the ArcGIS Online account. Training was conducted for Dudek’s Planning and Urban Design staff on how to navigate the ArcGIS Online environment and how to conduct mobile data collection so that staff can continue updating and managing their water utility assets in the future. Dudek used existing National Geodetic Survey control monuments where available. Dudek delivered the data in California State Plane Zone 3, U.S. feet, North American Datum of 2011, and North American Vertical Datum of 1988.

Eldorado Lugo Mohave Series As-Built Transmission Line Survey, Southern California Edison, California and Nevada.

Served as project manager for 600-mile power line survey utilizing helicopter lidar to determine vegetation clearances, measure line sag to verify compliance, and design new transmission lines across the state. Surveys were conducted within 1 week to avoid the nesting season shutdown. The Dudek team classified more than 24 billion Education
Liberty University
BS, Aeronautics
(Unmanned Aerial
Systems emphasis)
Certifications
FAA Remote Pilot
Certification, Part 107,
Small Unmanned Aircraft,
2016, No. 3940189
Private Pilot, Airplane
Instrument Rating,
No. 3858922
North Carolina DOT UAS
Commercial Operator
Permit, 2023,
No. C0018405
Transport Canada Small
Remotely Piloted Aircraft
System, Visual Line of Site,
Basic Operators, 2024,
No. PC2305318756
2 lidar points. This project is one of the largest of its kind. The field survey team installed benchmarks and ground control points for aerial data registration.

Owen’s Lake Aerial Lidar Survey for Dust Mitigation, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Lone Pine, California. Served as project manager for the quarterly lidar data collection for the Owen’s Lake dust mitigation project. This project required Notices to Air Missions to be filed with the Federal Aviation Administration in accordance with client requirements as the subject area falls within military aviation training routes. Permanent control was established on site to serve as the basis for each quarter’s data collection.

Moses Lake ALTA/NSPS and Hybrid Topographic Survey, AES US Renewables, Grant County, Washington.

Served as project manager, leading the survey efforts for an approximately 6,000-acre solar and battery energy storage system (BESS) development. The project involved ALTA/NSPS surveys for 59 parcels, a hybrid aerial lidar and ground-based topographic survey, and a lidar powerline survey of the proposed generator tie line alignments. This project was challenging due to its large size and required extensive coordination with the client and two dozen landowners.

UAV Lidar Forest Inventory, National Forest Service, Modoc National Forest, California. Served as project manager for the lidar data collection for more than 20,000 acres of undeveloped forest. The objective of the project was to obtain tree counts for forestry monitoring. Survey grade control was established throughout the subject areas and was utilized for the aerial data registration.

Green River Thermal and Multispectral Mapping, Petra Geosciences, Inc, Corona, CA. Served as project manager for a geotechnical engineering firm to perform high-resolution multispectral and thermal aerial mapping of a 218- acre site in Riverside County, California to supplement prior geophysical survey data. The team established a GNSS-based ground control network to accurately georeference aerial imagery, ensuring seamless integration with existing datasets. Deliverables included orthorectified multispectral and thermal maps and analytical overlays that provided insights into vegetation health, soil composition, and potential subsurface variations to support future site development.

Aerial Lidar Topographic Survey, Confidential Client, White Rock, California. Served as remote pilot in command to conduct lidar and orthoimagery flights for a large solar development. Lidar was utilized to create 1-foot contours across the project site and planimetrics were derived from the collected orthoimagery. Site features not visible from aerial data were collected on the ground using survey grade GNSS receivers.

Civil Design Topographic Surveys, City of La Canada Flintridge Engineering Department, La Canada Flintridge, California. Served as project manager for a 2-mile topographic survey for design purposes by the city engineer.

This project required the use of total stations necessary to achieve the high levels of accuracy required for design.

Several right-of-way permits were required to be filed and traffic control was organized for safety purposes.

Reservoir 5B Topographic Survey, South Coast Water District, Dana Point, California. Served as project manager for a civil design topographic survey for a reservoir maintained by the South Coast Water District. The data were utilized by project engineers for the design and replacement of the reservoir. 1 Raoul Rañoa

VISUAL STORYTELLING PRACTICE LEAD
Raoul Rañoa is the lead of Dudek’s Visual Storytelling practice. His 30-year career includes roles at the Los Angeles Times where he honed his expertise in breaking down complex data and processes into visual stories suitable for both expert and general audiences. He currently creates scientific visualizations for JPL/NASA contributing visuals to high-profile JPL/NASA projects such as the Mars helicopter and Ceres Mission Study. Raoul has prepared print, online, animated, and interactive visuals covering every facet of the environmental consulting industry and has led the development of visuals for many California Department of Water Resources (DWR) projects. He also prepared visuals for the award-winning San Diego State University (SDSU) Mission Valley Campus Master Plan/Design Guidelines and led the development of the San Diego Association of Governments’ (SANDAG’s) Adaption Guidelines and Resilience Toolkit. The Visual Storytelling Team at Dudek has spearheaded numerous signage projects. From large educational wall displays to interpretive signs dissecting complex topics like coastal erosion and habitat restoration, the team is adept at creating visually captivating signage using geographic information system (GIS), 3D, digital, and traditional Illustration. Their comfort in working with sign fabricators and installers ensures a seamless process and high-quality output.

Raoul is knowledgeable in print and web graphics production, including prepress, vector and 3D illustration, GIS, social media, video, and motion graphics. He has university-level teaching experience, as well as experience in technical editing, writing, reporting, and cartography. He has given presentations on visual communications at the 2021 Western Groundwater Congress, JPL, Loyola Marymount University, and the American Planning Association.

Raoul has been a key member of Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative journalism teams and his scientific visualizations for JPL have also been included in a recent Space Studies Board/National Academy of Sciences’ Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey. His interactive and illustrative work at Dudek has been awarded by organizations such as the American Planning Association and his work at the Los Angeles Times has been awarded multiple times by the Society of News Design, an international design competition, which he also judged in 2016. Additionally, Raoul’s data visualizations are nationally recognized, having been featured in the Best American Infographics book series 2 years in a row in 2013 and 2014.

Project Experience
Eagle Scout Lake Master Plan, Escondido, California. Responsible for infographics outlining proposed improvements to project area including wetland restoration and lake edge restoration.

The Shire, John Leon Center for Architecture and Landscape/Cultural Landscape Report, California. Responsible for data maps outlining all facets of the property, including historical structures, landscape features, trails, existing conditions, and views and vistas.

Elk Slough Rapid Levee Stability Survey, County of Sacramento, California. Created multiple 3D diagrams explaining bank erosion mitigation methods for entire length of Elk Slough.

Education
California Polytechnic
State University, Pomona
BA, Communications
(Journalism focus)
2 Tijuana River Estuary Tidal Restoration Program, State of California Department of Parks and Recreation– Southern Service Center, California. As lead graphic designer, responsible for infographics that outline project phases step by step.

Technical Assistance Program, DWR, State of California. Led creation and execution of visuals illustrating the DWR’s efforts supporting tribal and underrepresented communities. Visuals were used for a K–12 lesson plan, public outreach, and social media. Worked with DWR staff and the tribal liaison to illustrate, format, and print graphic novels illustrating Native American tribal water stories, water infrastructure, and principles of regenerative agriculture.

TreeDavis Memorial Grove Interpretive Signage, TreeDavis, California. Coordinating and leading creation of interpretive sign highlighting cultural significance of Memorial Grove at the City of Davis. Working with client to determine proper messaging and style of sign design and content.

Native Peoples Trade and Historic Hangar Interpretive Display, Port of Portland, Oregon. Led the design and creation of a 332-foot × 91-foot interpretive display incorporating Native American and aviation history. Project includes nine interpretive signs including historical photos, custom illustrative maps, architectural diagrams, a digital watercolor backdrop, and historical language. Worked closely with fabricator and installer to ensure all files were built to exact specs and production guidelines.

Marriott Meadows 24-Acre Park, Auburn Recreational Park District, Auburn, California. Oversaw the design of visuals explaining habitat conservation efforts, as well as current and historical site conditions. Work includes creating conceptual maps, rendering diagrams illustrating habitat conditions, and designing signage highlighting the area’s history.

Poinsettia Station Preserve, City of Carlsbad, California. Lead designer in the research and design of visuals outlining habitat conservation efforts. Work includes the creation of conceptual maps and diagrams explaining habitat conditions and coordination of installation and fabrication.

Auburn Recreation District Interpretive Signs, Auburn Recreation District, Auburn, California. Oversaw the design of multiple visuals explaining habitat conservation efforts, as well as current and historical site conditions. Work includes creating conceptual maps, rendering diagrams illustrating habitat conditions, and designing signage highlighting the area’s history.

Inland Empire Community Foundation Digital Regional Priority Plan, California. Project managing creation of Storymap/Experience Builder outlining the Inland Empire Community Foundation’s Regional Priority Plan. Duties include client relations, schedule management, data acquisition, design and creation of all visualizations, and budget management. Deliverables include custom infographics and imagery that client will re-purpose for social media/public outreach efforts.

Technical Services for Spatial Analysis and Visual Storytelling, San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, City of Asuza, California. Project managing a broad suite of technical services pursuant to the environmental integrity analysis and community vulnerability analysis. Duties include client relations, schedule management, design and creation of data visualizations, budget management, interactive regional priorities map development using ESRI Experience Builder/StoryMap platform, and public outreach and engagement products on wildfire resilience.
1 Ben DiAnna

CREATIVE DESIGNER II
Ben DiAnna (BEN dee-ANN-nah) has 10 years’ experience as a creative designer and multimedia specialist with professional expertise in design, technical illustration, information graphics, visual storytelling, and animation.

He has successfully created visuals across various subjects, including engineering, urban forestry, agriculture, horticulture, and natural sciences, demonstrating his ability to comprehend technical concepts swiftly, recognize their significance, and develop impactful still or animated graphic solutions for a wide range of viewers. He also has vast expertise in print and digital graphics production, encompassing geographic information systems, technical/concept illustration, and motion graphics.

Project Experience
Yolo County Equity and Engagement Strategy, County of Yolo, California. Coordinated, illustrated, and interpreted environmental strategy and equity concepts to craft bilingual and approachable visuals that bridge age gaps, engaging both kids and adults. These visuals played a vital role in targeted public outreach efforts, educating residents about the County’s future strategy and fostering a positive perception of the County’s future. (2023) Architectural Acoustics Graphics, Dudek, San Diego, California. Conceptualized and illustrated a captivating series of animated graphics, offering easy-to-understand visual explanations of acoustic properties and simulated sound-wave behavior. (2023)
Public Outreach Posters, Arevon Energy, California. Created a set of eight informative posters by synthesizing data from company resources, internal documents, and client meetings. These posters played a pivotal role in a public outreach event aimed at educating the community about a significant energy infrastructure project. The posters effectively complemented discussions with community members, showcasing complex technical details through captivating illustrations and user-friendly visuals. (2023) Urban Forestry Field Guide, City of Santa Maria, California. Developed a series of 10 technical and instructional graphics, effectively portraying urban tree and nursery management techniques for field workers. (2023) Trash Capture and Bioswales Infographic, City of Goleta, California. Developed an interpretive depiction of a bioswale, starting from conceptual sketches. This educational illustration displayed the aboveground and belowground components, effectively communicating the bioswale’s role in safeguarding the local ecosystem by filtering polluted water and debris before returning it to groundwater basins and creeks. The infographic was used in an engaging community outreach event to educate about initiatives in watershed protection. (2023) Map of Bat Species’ Impact on Wind Energy, Dudek, San Diego, California. Created a map consisting of both static and animated elements, showcasing the overlapping territories of three North American bat species across the United States. (2023)
Education
Palomar College,
San Marcos
AA, Graphic Design, 2019
1 Mark McGinnis

GIS MANAGER
Mark McGinnis is Dudek’s geographic information systems (GIS) group manager and has 19 years’ experience in geospatial technologies and application development in both the private and public sectors. Mr.

McGinnis has been responsible for project management and coordination, application development, software integration, spatial modeling/analysis, best practices initiatives, data development, and map production. His experience includes database development and management, spatial analysis, spatial model building, and online Web and mobile applications.

Mr. McGinnis has assisted in the preparation of habitat conservation plans (HCPs), biological resources technical reports, and environmental impact reports (EIRs). He has also provided needs assessments and as-needed GIS services to municipalities and agencies. In addition, Mr. McGinnis has provided GIS support for numerous biological resources reports, wetlands permitting and jurisdictional delineation.

Project Experience
Habitat Conservation/Preservation Framework Study, San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG), San Bernardino County, California.

Served as principal GIS analyst. Tasks included data management, analysis/modeling, and map production. Data has been compiled, organized and assimilated from a variety of sources into a comprehensive GIS database.

Project flow has been dynamic, requiring map production supporting day-to-day client interaction and timely decision making. Project is in progress.

Initial Management Action Plan, Rancho Mission Viejo Company, Orange County, California. Served as principal GIS analyst supporting technical studies and report production for Rancho Mission Viejo’s habitat preserve management. Project utilizes a diverse and complex suite of GIS layers that have been developed for the project or are currently under development.

Technical studies include a cactus wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus) focused survey report, and annual monitoring and maintenance reports for key habitats and species. Project requires coordination with numerous consultants and governmental agencies.

Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plant, California Energy Commission, Inyo, Kern, San Bernardino, Riverside, Imperial, Los Angeles, and San Diego Counties, California. Served as principal GIS analyst in support of the habitat conservation plan covering six counties in Southern California. Tasks have included data management, analysis/modeling, and map production. This project utilizes an ArcGIS Server 10 application, facilitating coordination and decision making. Responsible for creating species models run in an ArcSDE 10 environment and analyzing hundreds of data layers. Project flow has been dynamic, requiring map production supporting day-to-day client interaction and timely decision making. Project is in progress.

Education
San Diego State
University
MA, Geography
(Geographic Information
Science emphasis), 2001
University of California,
Santa Barbara
BA, Geography
(Geographic Information
Science emphasis), 1998
Certifications
FEMA Basic Hazards –
U.S. Multi-Hazard
Professional Affiliations
San Diego ESRI
Technology Showcase
Urban and Regional
Information
Systems Association
2 Salton Sea Species Conservation Plan, USFWS, Imperial County, California. Served as principal GIS analyst supporting this project to produce a species conservation plan for the Salton Sea. Technical studies include a least Bell’s vireo focused survey report and EIR. Project has addressed issues such as aesthetics, biological resources, geology, land use, and traffic. Project has required development of a diverse set of GIS data layers that support maps and analysis in varying formats and complexity. Project is in progress.

Del Dios Preserve, San Diego County Parks and Recreation Department, San Diego, California. Served as principal GIS analyst supporting this project to conduct multiple studies within a designated preserve area. Technical reports include a biological baseline biodiversity survey and vegetation management plan. Biologists have conducted and will be conducting wildlife and rare plant surveys. In support of these reports, a diverse set of GIS layers has been utilized and created. Data includes vegetation communities, sensitive species, and invasive species. Project is in progress.

Escondido Creek Preserve, San Diego County Parks and Recreation Department, San Diego, California. Served as principal GIS analyst supporting this project to conduct multiple studies within a designated preserve area.

Technical reports include a biological baseline biodiversity survey and vegetation management plan. Biologists have conducted and will be conducting wildlife and rare plant surveys. In support of these reports, a diverse set of GIS layers has been utilized and created. Data includes vegetation communities, sensitive species, and invasive species. Project is in progress.

San Luis Rey Riverpark, San Diego County Parks and Recreation Department, San Diego, California. Served as principal GIS analyst supporting this project to conduct multiple studies within a designated preserve area.

Technical reports include a biological baseline biodiversity survey and analysis of river crossings. In support of these reports, a diverse set of GIS layers has been utilized and created. Data includes vegetation communities, sensitive species, and invasive species. Project is in progress.

San Jacinto Land Management Plan, CDFW, Riverside County, California. Served as principal GIS analyst responsible for a land management plan for CDFW. Project required collection, development, and analysis of multiple layers. The study has helped in the creation of a future plan of development for the preserve areas.

Project is complete.

San Fernando Valley Spineflower Management Plan, Newhall Land and Farming Company, Los Angeles County, California. Served as principal Responsible for management, creation, and display of GIS layers. Modeled suitable habitat for San Fernando Valley spineflower through GIS overlay analysis. Produced three-dimensional graphics in support of the document. Project is in progress.

Tehachapi Upland Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Tejon Ranch Corporation, Kern County, California. Served as principal GIS analyst for the Tehachapi Upland MSHCP project, which consists of approximately 138,000 acres of undeveloped land on the southern border of Kern County. Responsible for management, creation, and display of hundreds of GIS layers. The GIS database maintains and analyzes complex species habitat modeling parameters for 26 species. Primary graphics producer for the MSHCP and EIR/environmental impact statement (EIS) documents. Project is in progress.

Southern Orange County Subregion NCCP/HCP, Rancho Mission Viejo Company, Orange County, California. Served as principal GIS analyst on controversial 130,000-acre NCCP/HCP for southern Orange County. Responsible for management, creation, and display of GIS layers. Lead GIS data coordinator between the County of Orange, Rancho Mission Viejo, and wildlife agencies. Conducted reserve design analysis in relation to biological resources and produced maps for public hearings and stakeholder meetings. Primary graphics producer for the NCCP/HCP and EIR/EIS documents. Project is complete.

Traci Myers
Executive Director
25+ Years Experience
P: (559) 802-3052
E: [email protected]
A: 324 S. Santa Fe Street
Visalia, CA 93292

REGISTRATIONS &

CERTIFICATIONS
Land Use & Environmental
Planning Certification
Lean Six Sigma
Keys to Economic Development
Certification
ABA Accredited Paralegal
Certification

EDUCATION
B.S. - Organizational
Leadership
Fresno Pacific University
Visalia, CA

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Economic Development
Organizational Leadership
Land Use
Environmental Planning

EMPLOYMENT
4Creeks, Inc. - Visalia, CA
Principal-in-Charge
01/25 - Present
City of Tulare - Tulare, CA
Executive Director of Economic
Development & Redevelopment
11/08 - 01/25
TM Consulting - Tulare, CA
Economic Development
Consultant
07/06 - 10/08
City of Visalia - Visalia, CA
Economic Development
Specialist
06/01 - 07/06

EXPERIENCE
Downtown Tulare Master Plan - Tulare, CA
Director of Economic Development
The City of Tulare’s award-winning Downtown Master Plan, developed in partnership with MIG, received the Award of Excellence for Comprehensive Plan from the Central California Chapter of the American Planning Association. The plan establishes a clear, communitydriven vision for revitalizing Tulare’s downtown through five key strategies—entertain, play, live, work, and eat—centered on creating a vibrant, walkable environment. Anchored by Zumwalt Park and the Adventist Health Amphitheater, the plan outlines catalytic projects designed to stimulate economic growth, enhance public spaces, and celebrate the City's distinct character.

Economic Development Investment Program - Tulare, CA
Director of Economic Development
The Tulare City Council recognized the importance of prioritizing economic development to stimulate private sector investment, job creation, and increased tax and utility revenues to support critical capital projects and community initiatives. To advance these goals, the City established the Economic Development Investment Program, designed to attract new business ventures within the city limits. Through this program, the City could offer financial assistance—such as fee waivers or reductions, infrastructure improvements, or tax abatements—on a case-by-case basis when a positive return on investment for the community was demonstrated. While generally not intended for residential or standard retail uses, the program allowed consideration of mixed-use, hotel, grocery, and destination retail projects located within special districts.

Business Accelerator - Tulare, CA
Director of Economic Development
The City of Tulare purchased the vacant former courthouse building adjacent to City Hall with plans to renovate the site into a Business Accelerator featuring an approximately 2,000- square-foot Maker’s Space. Located in the heart of Downtown Tulare, the facility was designed to support 12–24 start-up businesses across sectors such as transportation and logistics, technology, data processing, research and development, and vocational trades like woodworking. Recognizing the community’s diversity, the City planned to reserve up to 25% of tenant space for immigrant-owned businesses, fostering inclusive economic growth and innovation.

Entertainment District - Tulare, CA
Director of Economic Development
The City of Tulare pursued new opportunities to expand its retail, dining, and entertainment offerings, including plans for a regional sports and tournament complex to boost tourism and economic activity. Partnering with Victus Advisors, a nationally recognized firm specializing in sports and entertainment market analysis, the City completed comprehensive Market and Financial Feasibility Studies to evaluate community demand and financial viability. These efforts demonstrated Tulare’s proactive approach to economic development and its commitment to creating vibrant, experience-driven destinations for residents and visitors alike.

David Duda, AICP
Principal Planner
19+ Years Experience
P: (805) 904-4394
E: [email protected]
A: 605 Santa Rosa Street Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

REGISTRATIONS &

CERTIFICATIONS
AICP # 29216
Certification in Geographic
Information Systems
APA Member

EDUCATION
B.S. - City & Regional Planning
Minor in Environmental Design
Cal Poly SLO
San Luis Obispo, CA
A.A. - Architecture Emphasis
San Diego Mesa Community
College
San Diego, CA

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Project Management Land
Entitlements
CEQA/NEPA Compliance
Bike Master Plans
Conceptual & Master Plan Site
Design
City Planning & Design
Land Use Planning
General Plan/Zoning Ordinance
& Implementation
Policy Planning

EMPLOYMENT
4Creeks, Inc. -
San Luis Obispo, CA
Principal Planner
10/13 - Present
Quad Knopf, Inc. - Visalia, CA
Senior Associate
Planner/Project Manager
04/91-10/13

EXPERIENCE
Contract City Planning Services - Tulare, CA
City Planning Consultant/City Planner
Mr. Duda provided on-site contract City Planning services to the City of Tulare (population 64,546). He interpreted the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code as development projects were proposed. He also provided other planning evaluations such as CEQA/NEPA environmental documents and reviews, policy review, site plan reviews, staff reports, General Plan and Zoning Ordinance interpretations, and project management. Mr. Duda was responsible for processing Conditional Use Permits, CEQA compliance, Zone Changes, General Plan Amendments, and other City permitting required by the Planning Division. He provided ordinance updates for the City of Tulare to fit present day and future guidelines and requirements. Mr. Duda worked closely with the City staff to research, analyze, and provide direction on key planning and policy concerns.

Contract Planning Services - Sanger, CA
City Planning Consultant/Director
Mr. Duda provided on-site contract City Planning services to the City of Sanger. He interpreted the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code as development projects were proposed. He has also provided other planning evaluations such as environmental reviews, policy review, site plan reviews, staff reports, General Plan and Zoning Ordinance interpretations, and project management. Mr. Duda has been responsible for processing Conditional Use Permits, Zone Changes, Initial Studies/Mitigated Negative Declarations, General Plan Amendments, and other City permitting required by the Planning Division. He also provided ordinance updates for the City of Sanger to fit present day and future guidelines and requirements. Mr. Duda worked closely with the City staff to research, analyze, and provide direction on key planning and policy concerns.

Contract City Planning Services - Fresno, CA
City Planning Consultant/On-Call Environmental
Mr. Duda provides contract City Planning services to the City of Fresno (population 526,147).

He provides CEQA support for various projects with the City of Fresno and developers through 3rd party agreements for past 6 years. He provides other planning evaluations such as environmental reviews and CEQA compliance, policy review, site plan reviews, staff reports, General Plan and Zoning Ordinance interpretations, and project management. Mr. Duda has been performing CEQA compliance for various projects within the City very efficiently hitting deadlines, and within project budgets.

Contract Planning Services - Selma, CA
City Planning Consultant/Director
Mr. Duda provided on-site contract City Planning services to the City of Selma. He interpreted the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code as development projects were proposed. Mr.

Duda has been responsible for processing Conditional Use Permits, Zone Changes, Initial Studies/Mitigated Negative Declarations, General Plan Amendments, and other City permitting required by the Planning Division. Mr. Duda worked closely with the City staff to research, analyze, and provide direction on key planning and environmental policies.

Josh McDonnell, AICP
Principal Planner
30+ Years Experience
P: (714) 348-4458
E: [email protected]
A: 324 S. Santa Fe Street
Visalia, CA 93292

REGISTRATIONS &

CERTIFICATIONS
AICP# 108012

EDUCATION
M.U.R.P. - Urban Planning
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, CA
M.A. - Political Science
CSU Fullerton
Fullerton, CA
B.S. - City and Regional
Planning
Cal Poly, SLO
San Luis Obispo, CA

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Long Range Planning
Municipal Planning
Policy Planning
Land Design & Entitlements

EMPLOYMENT
4Creeks, Inc. - Visalia, CA
Principal Planner
02/25 - Present
City of Tulare - Tulare, CA
Assistant City Manager
10/19 - 02/25
City of Tulare - Tulare, CA
Community Development
Director
08/17 - 10/19
City of Visalia - Visalia, CA
Assistant Community
Development Director/City
Planner
09/11 - 08/17

EXPERIENCE
Contract City Planning Services - Avenal, CA
City Planning Consultant/City Planner
Mr. McDonnell currently serves as the Contract City Planner for the City of Avenal. He reviews all manner of discretionary permit-related requests including annexation requests, subdivision maps, and conditional use permits. He is also responsible for ensuring that all projects are compliant with CEQA and NEPA where appropriate. Mr. McDonnell also ensures that Avenal's long range planning documents are consistent with State law as well as the City Council's vision for long term growth. Finally, Mr. McDonnell works closely with Code Enforcement to ensure the proper regulation and abatement of code violations.

Contract City Planning Services - Hanford, CA
City Planning Consultant/Senior Planner
Mr. McDonnell is currently providing on-call current planning services to the City of Hanford while their senior planner is on health-related leave. Anticipated to conclude in September 2025, Mr. McDonnell is processing six discretionary permit requests entailing an annexation, subdivision maps, and planned unit developments as well as their accompanying CEQA documentation.

City Planner - Visalia, CA
City Planner
Mr. McDonnell was the City Planner for the City of Visalia for six years. As such, Mr. McDonnell managed the Planning and Code Enforcement divisions for the City, which included managing all day to day current planning, long range planning, and environmental planning functions. Mr. McDonnell also managed the preparation of a comprehensive update to the City of Visalia's General Plan and Zoning Code and represented City interests during a variety of regional planning initiatives such as the Regional Transporation Plan Update and Regional Housing Needs Assessment allocations.

Community Development Director – Tulare, CA
Community Development Director
Mr. McDonnell was the Community Development Director and later Deputy and Assistant City Manager for the City of Tulare between 2017 and 2025. As Community Development Director, Mr. McDonnell managed the Planning, Engineering, and Building functions of the City of Tulare. He staffed the Planning Commission and was responsible for the review and regulation of all development activity within the City of Tulare. Mr. McDonnell also authored substantial amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance and streamlined the City's development review process.

General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update – Selma, CA
Principal-in-Charge
Mr. McDonnell led the comprehensive update of the City of Selma General Plan as Principal in Charge and Project Manager, resulting in a fully revised plan with updated boundaries, elements, and policies. He facilitated public engagement and guided the plan through Planning Commission and City Council adoption. He also completed a full Zoning Ordinance update to ensure consistency with the new plan.

Appendix B
Sample Certificates of Insurance with Surety Information

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A : NAIC #
NAME: CONTACT
(A/C, No): FAX
E-MAIL ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext): PHONE

INSURED
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A

SUBR WVDADDL
INSD

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $
$
$
$ PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOS ONLY AUTOS NON-OWNED OWNED SCHEDULED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEEE.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH- STATUTE PER
(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFFLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $
$
OCCUR
CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ MED EXP (Any one person) $
EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
10/1/2025
Holmes Murphy & Associates
2727 Grand Prairie Parkway
Waukee IA 50263
Heather Vencil 515-223-7006 [email protected] Travelers Indemnity Co of CT 25682 4CHOLPC Travelers Property Casualty Co. America 25674 4 Creeks Inc.
324 Santa Fe St Ste A
Visalia, CA 93292
State Compensation Insurance Fund Lexington Insurance Company (AIG) 19437 Certain Underwriters of Lloyds, London 112717298 A X 1,000,000 X 1,000,000 5,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 X
DTCOA07783986 10/1/2025 10/1/2026
2,000,000
A 1,000,000 X
810B6301044 10/1/2025 10/1/2026
B X 1,000,000 X
CUPB8014038 10/1/2025 10/1/2026
1,000,000 X
0 C X
N
9339836 6/1/2025 6/1/2026
1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
D
E
Excess Liability
Professional Liability
027734453
DB250271
10/1/2025
10/1/2025
10/1/2026
10/1/2026
Each Occurrence/Agg.

Per Claim/Aggregate
4,000,000
3,000,000
Proof of Insurance

Appendix C
Proposed Schedule

P202502965 (Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan)
City of Tulare
Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan

DUDEK SCHEDULE
Task Description Duration 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 2 9 16 23 30 9 13 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 Task 1 Project Management, Meetings and Coordination

1.1 Kickoff Meeting & Site Visit 1 day

1.2 Monthly Coordination Meetings

1.3 Project Management
Task 2 Research and Analysis

2.1 Background Research 2 weeks

2.2 Existing Conditions Assessment 3 weeks

2.3 Opportunities and Constraints Memorandum 1 month
City Review Opportunities and Constraints Memorandum 2 weeks Task 3 Alternative and Preferred Plans

3.1 Draft Alternative Plans 2 months
City Review Draft Alternative Plans 2 weeks

3.2 Preferred Design 1 month
Task 4 Master Plan

4.1 Draft Master Plan 2 months
City Review Draft Master Plan 2 weeks

4.2 Draft-Final Master Plan 1 month
City Review Draft-Final Master Plan 2 weeks

4.3 Final Master Plan 4 weeks
Task 5 Public Outreach

5.1 Engagement Schedule and Strategy Document 2 weeks

5.2 Public Workshops 1 & 2 1 week

5.3 Public Workshops 3 & 4 1 week

5.4 Public Workshops 5 & 6 1 week

5.5 Interested Parties Meetings 1 day/each

5.6 Public Outreach Support (surveys, social media, etc.) 3 weeks/each Task 6 CEQA Compliance 6 months
November 4, 2025
November December
2026
January February March April May June July August September October Dudek Project Budget Created 11/6/20252:57 PM Page 1 of 1

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
RFP # 26-827
Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan
Submittal: One (1) unbound original and four (4) copies must be received on or before:
2:00 p.m. on Monday, November 10, 2025
Addressed to: City of Tulare, c/o City Clerk
Address: 411 East Kern Avenue, Tulare, CA 93274
Mark envelope: Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan
Responses received after the time and date stated above shall be returned unopened to the proposer.

INQUIRIES:

Direct questions for clarification of this Request for Proposals document to Mr. Chris Orr, Community Services Director, in writing via e-mail at [email protected]. Deadline to submit questions regarding this RFP is 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 8, 2025.

CITY OF TULARE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
RFP # 26-827
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that proposals and separate, sealed cost proposals will be received at the City of Tulare City Clerk’s Office, 411 E. Kern Avenue, Tulare, California until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, November 10, 2025, for the provision of the following:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan Master Plan
Any submittal received after the hour stated above for any reason whatsoever, will not be considered for any purpose but will be returned, unopened to the proposer. The submission shall include the entire Request for Proposals (RFP) documentation and all addenda issued by the City, if any.

Request for Proposal documents may be inspected and obtained in the office of the Community Services Department, 830 S. Blackstone Street, Tulare, California 93274 or on the City’s web site www.tulare.ca.gov.

Please monitor the website for all information regarding this RFP. The City will send individual notifications of changes, updates, clarifications, and/or addenda only to those who submit questions in writing via email.

The City hereby affirmatively ensures that Minority Business Enterprises and Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), as defined in 49 CFR, Part 26, shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed, in whole or in part, under an agreement as a result of this RFP and will be afforded full opportunity to submit a Proposal in response to this notice and will not be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, gender or religion in any consideration leading to the award of contract. No qualified disabled person shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participating in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity leading to the award of a contract.

All persons responding to this invitation shall be aware that their Proposal is deemed a public record and may be subject to disclosure upon request. The right is reserved by the City of Tulare to reject any or all responses, to waive any irregularities or informalities not affected by law, to evaluate the Proposals submitted and to award the contract according to the Proposal which best serves the interests of said City.

Publication Dates: September 17, 2025

Table of Contents
RFP # 26-827................................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 5 Information .................................................................................................................................... 5 Background/Project Description.................................................................................................... 5 Minimum Qualifications .......................................................................................................................... 6 Purpose of Request and Process for Selection ............................................................................ 6 Time of Performance..................................................................................................................... 6 Schedule ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Names - Definitions....................................................................................................................... 7 SCOPE OF SERVICES – Request for Proposal ............................................................................. 7 A. Project Administration ................................................................................................................... 7

1. Consultant’s Responsibilities ........................................................................................................ 7

2. City Responsibilities ...................................................................................................................... 7

3. Progress Reporting ....................................................................................................................... 8

4. Deliverables................................................................................................................................... 8 B. Research and Analysis ................................................................................................................. 8

1. Park Facility Inventory and Analysis ............................................................................................. 8 C. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 8

1. Compliance with Parks and Recreation Master Plan, General Plan and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)................................................................................................................................. 8

2. Draft Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 8

3. Final Comprehensive Master Plan................................................................................................ 8 PROPOSAL CONTENT AND FORMAT REQUIREMENTS............................................................ 9 A. Cover letter.................................................................................................................................... 9 General Information ...................................................................................................................... 9 PROPOSALS ................................................................................................................................ 9 Ability to Provide Requested Services ........................................................................................10 Staff Qualifications and Related Experience...............................................................................10 Compensation .............................................................................................................................10 Conflict of Interest .......................................................................................................................10 Requested Modification to Professional Services Agreement....................................................11 CONSULTING FIRM SELECTION PROCEDURE........................................................................11 Criteria.........................................................................................................................................11 B. Weight of Criteria ........................................................................................................................12 C. Evaluation Procedure:.................................................................................................................12 D. Background Check......................................................................................................................12 Award of Contract .......................................................................................................................12 GENERAL CONDITIONS ..............................................................................................................12 A. Important Notice..........................................................................................................................12 B. Contracting Agency.....................................................................................................................13 C. Legal Responsibilities .................................................................................................................13 D. Permits and Licenses..................................................................................................................13 E. Insurance.....................................................................................................................................13 CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS.....................................................................................................15 WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL................................................................................................. 15 REJECTION OF PROPOSAL.....................................................................................................15 EVALUATION/EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT .........................................................................16 FEES FOR SERVICE GUIDELINES ..........................................................................................16 ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT...............................................................................................16 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT..............................................................................................16 RIGHT TO REQUIRE PERFORMANCE ....................................................................................17 ETHICS IN PUBLIC CONTRACTING.........................................................................................17 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR................................................................................................18 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY...................................................................................18 VENUE........................................................................................................................................18 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ................................................................................................18 INCURRING COSTS ..................................................................................................................19 PRE-AWARD AUDIT ..................................................................................................................19 S A M P L E C O N T R A C T - subject to changes .................................................................................20 I. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CONSULTANT.........................................................20 II. TIME OF PERFORMANCE ...........................................................................................................21 III. COMPENSATION..........................................................................................................................21 IV. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE..............................................................................................21 V. TERMINATION ..............................................................................................................................22 VI. INTEREST OF OFFICIALS AND THE CONSULTANT ................................................................23 VII. NO PERSONNEL AGENCY, COMMISSION, OR CONTINGENT FEE ...................................24 IX. SUBCONTRACTING.....................................................................................................................24 X. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR...................................................................................................24 XI. SPECIFICATIONS.........................................................................................................................24 XII. DOCUMENTS/DATA.................................................................................................................25 XIII. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE ...................................................................................25 XIV. NON-DISCRIMINATION............................................................................................................28 XV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS............................................................................................29 XVI. ADDITIONAL MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.....................................................................30

INTRODUCTION
Information
The City of Tulare (”City”) is seeking sealed proposals to develop a Master Plan and associated environmental review documents for Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan.

The project deliverables shall conform to all applicable codes and regulations, and shall be coordinated with the Community Services Director, Assistant Community Services Director, Parks Manager, and City Engineer. Interested consulting firms are invited to submit statements of qualifications and sealed proposals for the work described in this RFP.

Consultants are urged to submit concise proposals appropriate to the scale of the project, and to include only items that are relevant to this specific project. The Fee Proposal shall be submitted in a separate sealed envelope marked “Fee Proposal – RFP # 26-827 - Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan”.

The City of Tulare reserves the right to reject any or all responses received as a result of this solicitation; to extend the submission due date; to modify, amend, reissue or rewrite this document; and to procure any or all services by other means.

The City of Tulare will not be liable for costs incurred by the consulting firms’ incidentals to the preparation of proposals or for developing and carrying out interview presentations, if needed.

Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this Request for Proposals (RFP) and Sealed Fee Proposal unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City of Tulare and the firm selected.

This RFP is being issued by the City of Tulare, Community Services Department. Unless otherwise directed, all communications regarding this RFP should be directed to the Community Services Department at (559) 684-4315. However, to prevent misinterpretations, the Community Services Department would prefer that all questions be sent by e-mail to Mr. Chris Orr, Community Services Director, at [email protected].

Any revisions to the RFP will be issued and distributed as addenda. Respondents are specifically directed not to contact any other City personnel for meetings, conferences or technical discussions related to this RFP. Failure to adhere to this policy may be grounds for rejection of a Proposal.

One (1) unbound original and four (4) copies of the Proposal are to be submitted to the City Clerk’s Office, located at 411 East Kern Avenue, Tulare, CA 93274, on or before Monday, November 10, 2025, at 2:00 p.m.

Background/Project Description
Tulare is located at the intersection of California State Highways 99 and 137, in the southern San Joaquin Valley. The City’s population is approximately 72,000, and the incorporated area covers approximately 20 square miles.

Agriculture remains the lifeblood of the local economy and Tulare sits in the heart of some of the most productive farmland in the world. The strategic location makes Tulare very attractive to food processors and distributors because of the central location and abundant supply of locally grown products.

The main line of the Union Pacific Railroad runs through Tulare, offering rail access to major cities throughout the United States.

Elk Bayou Regional Park is owned by the City of Tulare and is located in south Tulare. It consists of nine parcels, is approximately 54 acres, and has a length of approximately one mile (Attachment A). It is bordered on the west by California State Highway 99 and approximately three quarters of the park is dissected on the east by Laspina Street. Northeast of the park is the Elk Bayou Soccer Complex (which touches one corner of the park), the Tulare Golf Course, and the International Agri-Center. Hosfield Drive borders the entirety of the park on the south. On the north side of the park there are some commercial businesses and Mefford Field Airport (Attachment (B).

The Bayou runs east to west and is surrounded by agriculture land, which could be acquired for future expansion of the park.

Elk Bayou Regional Park is subject to seasonal flooding (Attachment C).

The current amenities at the park include a parking lot, outdated group picnic pavilions, a non-operable restroom building, outdated playground area, backstop, and an outdated potable water system.

The goal of the project is to establish an outdoor recreation and nature preserve at the Elk Bayou by incorporating multi-use trails along both sides of the bayou along with foot bridges over the bayou to create a regional trail system that includes interpretative signage, habitat restoration, land acquisition, and redevelopment of the Elk Bayou Park. Other potential elements include kayak launch and exit points at Laspina Street and Hosfield Drive, picnic pavilions, and individual picnic tables.

An additional element the City is interested in considering is to design a high ropes or zipline adventure course throughout Elk Bayou Regional Park to be operated by a third-party vendor.

Minimum Qualifications
• The technical competence and resources to perform the work specific to this RFP. • Experience in the preparation of a Master Plan similar in size and characteristics.

Purpose of Request and Process for Selection
The City of Tulare 2023 Parks and Recreation Master Plan evaluated the existing Elk Bayou Regional Park very low for functionality and overall condition.

The City of Tulare is requesting proposals from experienced consulting firms to develop a comprehensive Master Plan, preliminary cost information based on masterplan concepts, and associated environmental review documents for Elk Bayou Nature Preserve. The Master Plan will include a project description and site plan identifying appropriate uses for the park.

Based upon the criteria in the RFP, the selection committee will select the most qualified firm and attempt to negotiate an Agreement. If such negotiations are not successful, the City may negotiate with the next most qualified respondent(s).

Time of Performance
The term of this work shall commence on the Effective Date and expire once all services have been rendered unless an extension is approved in writing by the City. It is anticipated that all items of work shall be completed, and deliverables provided to the City within one hundred eighty (180) days. The actual time of performance included in the Professional Services Agreement will be based on the schedule provided by the selected consultant and agreed to by the City.

Schedule
Event Date of Event
RFP for Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan
Request for proposals is released ................................................................................. September 17, 2025 All questions must be received by 5:00 p.m. ....................................................................... October 8, 2025 Proposals due by 2:00 pm ............................................................................................. November 10, 2025 Interviews of short-listed firms ………………………………………………….... ……… December 8-10, 2025 City Council Awards Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan ………………………… .. December 16, 2025 Agreement begins (or sooner) ............................................................................................. January 12,2025 Names - Definitions
For this RFP, the Owner and City will be one and the same. For this RFP, the Consulting Firm, Consultant, and Proposer shall be one and the same.

SCOPE OF SERVICES – Request for Proposal
A. Project Administration

1. Consultant’s Responsibilities
• Prepare a legally defensible Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration and all associated notices and findings in compliance with the CEQA necessary to analyze the environmental impacts of the project, define environmental commitments, and describe mitigation and monitoring responsibilities.
• Provide a Master Plan that includes a project description and site plan identifying appropriate uses for the park based on coordination with project partners. The Master Plan will include capital and operational improvement to Elk Bayou Nature Preserve consistent with the City of Tulare Parks and Recreation Master Plan and that proactively responds to current issues and interests, and short-and long-term planned growth in the area. • Public Engagement & Information - The consultant will organize and conduct public participation meetings which will include:
 Two meetings on site at Elk Bayou Regional Park
 Two meetings during the weekend or after 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday  One meeting to be held at any reasonable time and day. • The consultant will work with City staff to comply with public meeting notification requirements and will be responsible for preparing a public information program inclusive of producing materials to help inform the public about the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan process, progress, key recommendations and findings.
• The Consultant shall provide a working schedule indicating major milestones to complete the work identified in the scope of services above.
• The Consultant will be required to perform field data collection necessary to complete the requirements of the Project. The Consultant is solely responsible for the safety of its employees including any sub-consultant employees during any field operations. • The Consultant shall provide project management to a level commensurate with the Project including clearly defined lines of communication between the City and the Consultant, coordination necessary for successful completion of the Project, timely invoicing for services rendered, and notification of tasks outside the executed Agreement.

2. City Responsibilities
• Compensate the Consultant as provided in the Professional Services Agreement. • Provide a "City Representative" who will represent the City and who will work with the Consultant in carrying out the provisions of the RFP.
• Provide access to City facilities as required.
• Provide available data pertinent to the Project.
• Provide the Consultant with City documents including policies, procedures, regulations and standards pertinent to the Project.
• Attend meetings with Consultant and conduct meetings where appropriate. • Provide a list of stakeholders and other agency personnel involved with the Project. • Examine documents submitted to the City by the Consultant and render decisions pertaining thereto in a timely manner.
• Give reasonably prompt consideration to all matters submitted by the Consultant for approval such that there will be no substantial delays in the Consultant’s program of work.

3. Progress Reporting
• The Consultant and the City Representative shall hold progress meetings as often as necessary, but in no case less than once every two weeks (teleconferencing is acceptable) until the final plan is approved by the City Council.
• The Consultant shall supply the City Representative with at least one (4) copy of all completed or partially completed reports, studies, forecasts, maps or plans as deemed necessary by the City Representative at least three (3) working days before each progress meeting.
• The City Representative shall schedule the meetings, as necessary, at key times during the development of the Master Plan.

4. Deliverables
The Consultant shall be responsible for providing master copies in a full color, editable digital format for each report throughout the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan project. File formats for public posting must be compatible with the City’s website.

B. Research and Analysis

1. Park Facility Inventory and Analysis
The Consultant will develop an inventory and analysis of the existing facilities at Elk Bayou Regional Park. The analysis should consider the capacity of each amenity found within the system (playgrounds, ball fields, trails, natural areas, special facilities, utilities etc.) as well as functionality, accessibility, condition, comfort, convenience and useful life.

C. Recommendations

1. Compliance with Parks and Recreation Master Plan, General Plan and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The Consultant will be required to ensure that the Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan complies with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan City of Tulare Active Transportation Plan, and the City’s General Plan. The Consultant shall be required to complete all CEQA related requirements for necessary environmental review and clearance prior to final review by the Parks & Recreation Committee and the City Council.

2. Draft Recommendations
The Consultant shall prepare draft recommendations and a conceptual Layout plan with two (2) alternative optional designs with colored renderings for review by the public, the project team, the Parks & Recreation Committee and the City Council. The Consultant shall attend a Parks & Recreation Committee meeting and City Council meeting to present the draft report and shall provide all materials for review during the meeting. The Consultant shall be responsible for completing all updates and modifications that result from the review of the draft Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan by the Parks & Recreation Committee and City Council.

3. Final Comprehensive Master Plan
The Consultant shall prepare a draft Comprehensive Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan document for review and editing by the project team, and for public review. Based on the recommended revisions, the Consultant will provide a final Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan including models and display material for any recommended future facilities, acquisitions or development. The Consultant will also be required to assist with preparing the associated draft staff reports and to attend City Council meetings to present plan findings and recommendations.

The Comprehensive Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan must include Supporting charts, graphs, maps and other data as needed to support the plan and its presentation.

PROPOSAL CONTENT AND FORMAT REQUIREMENTS
Respondents are requested to organize their Proposal into sections with tabs corresponding to the listed selection criteria as follows. Please answer the following questions in the same sequence as below. A screening committee will evaluate the completeness of the response to the RFP.

A. Cover letter
• A cover letter highlighting the qualifications and experience as they relate to this RFP.

General Information
• Firm name, address, and telephone number.
• Firm Representative or other person to contact for clarification of any item contained in the proposal. Include email address and telephone and fax numbers if different from above. • Specify type of organization (individual, partnership or corporation) and, if applicable, indicate whether you are:
a. Small Business.
b. Disadvantaged Business.
c. Minority and/or Women-Owned Business.
• Provide your Federal Tax ID Number and City of Tulare Business Tax Certificate Number. • Provide names of company’s owners/officers.
• Personnel of the Proposer’s Firm must be identified in the Proposal with their background and the firm must give assurances of continuity of its personnel. A Project Manager to serve as the primary point of contact needs to be identified.
• Provide surety information for all sureties – General and Automobile Liability, E/O and Worker’s Compensation.
• References and Referrals – Provide four (4) public agency references for similar assignments directly involving the Project Manager. Past experience should be specific to preparing construction documents (plans specifications and estimates) for a domestic wastewater treatment plant and related public works projects; bidding assistance, and construction support for this type of project. The location, Consultant’s fee and reference (agency name, contact person with email address and telephone number(s)) shall be included for each project listed.

The envelope enclosing the separate, sealed Proposal shall be plainly marked in the upper left-hand corner as follows:

City of Tulare, c/o City Clerk
Company’s Name
Company’s Address
RFP for Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan
Deadline for Submittal: 2:00 p.m. Monday, November 10, 2025 City Hall - City Clerk’s Office, 411 E. Kern Avenue, Tulare, CA 93274

PROPOSALS
Proposals shall include a brief description of the Project Description/Scope of Services as you understand it and present a proposed work plan. Include any additional services you feel are necessary to complete the work not identified in the RFP. The proposal should include a section for the tasks the Consultant is expected or proposes to provide to complete the Project.

Prepare and include a Time of Completion Schedule and Cost Proposal based on your firm’s Proposal/Scope of Work. Refer to the Compensation Section (Section F) for requirements related to providing a Cost Proposal.

Ability to Provide Requested Services
• In this Section, provide a brief description of your firm’s level of experience in successfully providing these services, and brief descriptions of past municipal work providing the same services.
• Identify additional services not noted in this RFP that your firm feels would benefit the City with a brief statement of why the service should be of importance to the City.

In addition, you are invited to include a maximum of two (2) pages of information not included, nor requested in this RFP, if you feel it may be useful and applicable to this project.

Staff Qualifications and Related Experience

1. Staff Qualifications and Experience
This section should demonstrate the qualifications of all professional personnel to be assigned to this agreement by providing resumes/experience summaries describing their education, credentials, related experience of each individual employee or subcontractor proposed for assignment to the agreement and their proposed roles for a task order.

2. Related Experience
Include descriptive information concerning the experience of the firm. Include information about previous municipal projects which are similar in nature, delivery method, magnitude, complexity, budget variance, and other appropriate information. Substantial weight is given to a firm’s ability to deliver task orders on budget and within an approved timeframe. Please demonstrate the firm’s ability to meet these goals.

Compensation
Include a Cost Proposal in a separate sealed envelope for the work identified in the Scope of Services in Section II above. The envelope shall be labeled per the requirements of Section B above with the addition of adding “Cost Proposal” to the upper left corner. The Cost Proposal shall be broken down into three categories: design engineering services (preparation of plans, specifications and estimates), bidding assistance, and construction support.

It is expected that for the design and bidding assistance phases the Consultant will be compensated for based on a lump sum fee submitted with the RFP and approved by the City and that for construction support services the Consultant will be compensated for on a time and material fee basis based on the hourly rates provided in the Cost Proposal.

Conflict of Interest
• Disclose any financial, business or other relationship with the City or any member of the City staff that may have an impact on the outcome of the project.
• List current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of the project.

Requested Modification to Professional Services Agreement • Disclose any modifications to the attached Professional Consulting Services Agreement (Attachment 1) your firm would like considered. Disclosure of Professional Service Agreement modifications is not a guarantee the City will make any modification to the Agreement. The included Agreement has been reviewed and approved for use by the City Attorney’s office and as such will only be modified upon approval of the City Attorney.

CONSULTING FIRM SELECTION PROCEDURE
Selection of the successful respondents shall be generally based on the information provided by the proposer in response to the Request for Proposal and any subsequent interviews that may be conducted.

The process for selection shall occur in the following sequence:
• Review Proposals
• Establish a “short list” of qualified firms.
• Interview “short listed” firms (at the option and discretion of the City). • Identify best qualified firm(s)
• Recommend award of Professional Services Agreement to City Council Consultant selection shall be based on the information provided in the Proposals received in response to the RFP. The City reserves the right to make the selection of a Consultant based on any or all factors of value, whether quantitatively identifiable or not, including, but not limited to, the anticipated initiative and ability of the Proposer to perform the services set forth herein.

A project Selection Committee, as deemed necessary, will be formed to evaluate proposals, interview shortlisted firms, and to make a contract award recommendation to the Tulare City Council. The Committee will review the proposals for format to ensure conformance with the requirements of the RFP. This committee may consist of representatives of the Community Services Department, Engineering Services Department, Internal Services Department, members of the community, and may include a representative knowledgeable in Parks and Recreation facility management from outside of the community. During interviews, if needed, the Proposer will be allowed to present such evidence as may be appropriate in order that the Committee can correctly analyze all materials and documentation submitted as a part of the Proposal.

Composition and creation of this committee is at the sole discretion of the City. Names of the Committee members will not be released prior to the time for interviews.

Criteria
The Committee will address the following criteria in evaluation of proposals in order to gauge the ability of a consultant to perform the contract as specified. The same general criteria will be used to judge both the proposal and the presentation, should the City choose to conduct interviews with short-listed firms.

Criteria As Demonstrated By:
• Merit of Proposal/Presentation Proposal thoroughness and meeting RFP requirements • Knowledge and expertise Capability of personnel, firm qualifications and experience Adequacy of staff to perform the work
• Record of past performance References
Ability to work effectively with City staff, other public agencies and related parties
Demonstrated ability to deliver projects timely and on budget Experience with projects of similar scope
• Knowledge of local conditions Project work in the City of Tulare City of Tulare Demographics
• Local Preference Office performing work as identified in the Proposal has a zip code within Tulare County
B. Weight of Criteria
Criteria Weight
• Merit of Proposal/Presentation 15
• Knowledge and Expertise 30
• Past Performance, References 30
• Knowledge of Local Conditions 20
• Local Preference 5
C. Evaluation Procedure:

The Selection Committee will review the Proposals submitted and establish a list of finalists based on the pre-established review criteria. If deemed necessary to clarify qualifications, an oral interview with one or more of the firms submitting Proposals may be requested after written Proposals have been received and reviewed by the City. The City will schedule the time and place for the interview, if determined to be necessary. Each proposer should be prepared to clarify and elaborate on the details set forth in their Proposal.

The individual or composite rating and evaluation forms prepared by the Selection Committee will not be revealed. The Selection Committee will review the Proposals based on pre-established review criteria and determine the most qualified Proposer(s).

If during the evaluation process the City is unable to assure itself of the Proposer’s ability to perform under the contract, if awarded, the City has the option of requesting from the Proposer any information that the City deems necessary to determine the Proposer’s capabilities. If such information is required, the Proposer will be notified and will be permitted seven (7) working days to submit the requested information.

D. Background Check
The City reserves the right to conduct a background inquiry of each Proposer which may include the collection of appropriate criminal history information, contractual and business associations and practices, employment histories and reputation in the business community. By submitting a Proposal to the City, the Proposer consents to such an inquiry and agrees to make available to the City such books and records as the City deems necessary to conduct the inquiry.

Award of Contract
The City intends to identify one or more consulting firms with which to enter into Professional Services Agreement for on-call services. The City of Tulare reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals, to waive any informality in any Proposal, to sit in act as sole judge of the merit of each response submitted, to select a consultant, and to award in any manner which is more favorable to the City of Tulare. After the selection of successful firm(s), the City will negotiate contracts in substantial conformance to the sample professional services contract contained in Exhibit ‘A’ reflecting the terms and conditions of the proposal plus the City's standard liability and insurance requirements. A Draft Agreement has been included in this RFP to alert proposers to the provisions generally found in City contracts. The Draft Agreement may be altered from the enclosed form at the discretion of the City and without notice to consultant prior to award of contract. The City does not guarantee that the Final Agreement will duplicate the enclosed Draft Agreement.

GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. Important Notice
The City of Tulare will not be responsible for oral interpretations given by any City employee, representative, or others. Proposers are cautioned that any statements made that materially change any portion of the RFP documents shall not be relied upon unless subsequently ratified by a formal written amendment to the RFP document. The issuance of a written addendum is the only official method whereby interpretation, clarification, or additional information can be given.

B. Contracting Agency
The contract resulting from this Request for Proposals will be administered by the City of Tulare Community Services Department.

C. Legal Responsibilities
By submitting a Proposal, Consultant certifies that he or she will comply with all Federal laws and requirements, including but not limited to Equal Employment Opportunity, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Labor Protection and other laws and regulation applicable to contracts utilizing State and Federal Funds.

D. Permits and Licenses

1. Business License Certificate
Possession of a City of Tulare Business License is not required to submit a proposal in response to this RFP. However, selected consultant(s) shall be required to possess, at his/her own expense, a valid and current City of Tulare Business License, prior to commencing work. For fee information, contact the City of Tulare Finance Department at (559) 684-4225.

2. Professional License
Firms to provide professional services under an Agreement as the result of responding to this RFP shall be certified by the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), are to be licensed in accordance with the California Business and Professions Code and shall be licensed to perform work in the State of California.

3. Permits
The selected Consultant shall be required to obtain and maintain at his/her own expense, any and all permits, licenses and certifications issued by any federal, state or local governmental agency, pertaining to, and necessary for providing the services required in this Request for Proposal.

E. Insurance

1. Insurance
With respect to performance of work under an agreement as a result of responding to this RFP, Consultant shall maintain, and shall require all of its Sub-consultants to maintain, insurance as described below:
i) Commercial General Liability and Property Damage. The Consultant shall maintain insurance for protection against all claims arising from injury to person or persons not in the employment of the Consultant and against all claims resulting from damage to any property due to any act or omission of the Consultant, his agents, or employees in the operation of the work or the execution of this contract. Such insurance shall include products/completed operations liability, owners and Consultant’s protective, blanket contractual liability, personal injury liability, and broad form property damage coverage. The minimum shall be as follows:

Bodily Injury (Injury or Accidental Death) and
Property Damage (Per occurrence)
$2,000,000 Combined Single Limit and
$4,000,000 aggregate.
ii) Commercial Automobile Public Liability and Property Damage. The Consultant shall maintain Automobile Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance for protection against all claims arising from the use of vehicles, owned, hired and non-owned, or any other vehicle in the prosecution of the work included in this contract. Such insurance shall cover the use of automobiles and trucks on and off the site of the project. The minimum amounts of Automobile Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance shall be as follows:

Bodily Injury (Injury or Accidental Death) and
Property Damage (Per occurrence)
$1,000,000 Combined Single Limit.
iii) Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions). The consultant shall maintain Professional Liability Insurance for protection against all claims arising out of professional error or omission with a limit of not less than $2,000,000.
iv) Workers' Compensation Insurance. The Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance with statutory limits and Employers Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident. Such insurance shall comply with all applicable state laws. Consultant shall provide the City with a Certificate of Insurance showing proof of insurance acceptable to City.

Certificates containing wording that releases the insurance company from liability for nonnotification of cancellation of the insurance policy are not acceptable. Policies are to be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation against the City, its officers, official’s agents and employees.

Consultant and its employees are independent Consultants and not employees of the City of Tulare. Consultant and/or its insurers are responsible for payment of any liability arising out of Worker's Compensation, unemployment or employee benefits offered to its employees.

The insuring provisions, insofar as they may be judged to be against public policy shall be void and unenforceable only to the minimum extent necessary so that the remaining terms of the insuring provisions herein may be within public policy and enforceable. The City’s Risk Manager is hereby authorized to reduce the requirements set forth above in the event they determine that such reduction is in the City’s best interest.

2. Additional Insured
The General Liability and Auto Liability policy is to contain or be endorsed to name the City, its officers, appointed and elected officials, agents and employees as Additional Insured as respects the liability arising out of the activities performed in connection with this contract. The coverage shall (a) be primary with respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City; (b) shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability; and (c) contain Standard Cross-liability provisions. Such additional insured endorsements maintained by the Consultant and its Sub-consultants shall not be required to provide coverage for City for the active negligence of City. Original endorsements, signed by a person authorized to bind coverage on its behalf, shall be furnished to the City by the successful proposer.

3. Indemnification
Refer to the indemnification section of the attached Sample Professional Services Agreement for specific language to be included with the Agreement.

4. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention
Any deductibles or self-insured retention must be declared to, and approved by, the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officials, employees, agents and Consultants; or the vendor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses in an amount specified by the City.

Separate endorsements are required, naming the City as additional insured, for liability insurance and providing a waiver of subrogation for Worker’s Compensation Insurance.

The successful proposer shall maintain the insurance for the life of the Professional Services Agreement (Agreement). Said insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies will not be canceled unless and until thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City.

Endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. Should Consultant cease to have insurance as required during any time, all work by Consultant pursuant to the Agreement shall cease until insurance acceptable to the City is provided.

Original insurance certificates and endorsements are to be mailed or delivered to:

City of Tulare
Community Services Department
830 S. Blackstone Street
Tulare, CA 93274
In addition to any other remedies the City may have if the Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option:

1. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the contract; or

2. Order Consultant to stop work under the contract and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; or

3. Terminate the contract.

Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies the City may have and is not the exclusive remedy for the Consultant’s failure to maintain or secure appropriate endorsements.

Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from the Consultant’s or its Sub-consultant’s performance of the work covered under the contract.

CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
A sample Contract / Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) is included in the Exhibits to this RFP to be reviewed by the Consultant. An agreement between the City and each selected Consultant will be required to be fully executed prior to a task order being assigned. As part of the Agreement, the Consultant’s hour rate schedule will be attached.

Any requested changes, modifications, and edits to the Agreement by a Consultant submitting a Proposal shall be clearly identified in the submitted Proposal. The included Agreement has been approved by the City for use in securing professional services and therefore is not expected to be modified at the Consultant’s request. Comments provided by Consultants related to the Agreement will be reviewed with efforts made to obtain acceptance by both parties. However, the City will not modify language that puts the City in an inferior position or lessor position than authorized or specified in the sample agreement.

WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL
Any Proposal may be withdrawn at any time prior to the time fixed in the public notice for the receipt of Proposals, only by written request for the withdrawal of the Proposal filed with the Community Services Division. The request shall be executed by the Proposer or his duly authorized representative. The withdrawal of a Proposal does not prejudice the right of the Proposer to file a new Proposal. No Proposal may be withdrawn after the time fixed in the public notice for the receipt of Proposals.

REJECTION OF PROPOSAL
Failure to meet the requirements of the RFP may be cause for rejection of the Proposal. The City may reject the Proposal if it is deemed incomplete, contains irregularities of any kind or is offered conditionally. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Proposals without cause.

The Proposal is to be prepared in such a way as to provide a straightforward, concise delineation of the information requested. Proposals which contain false or misleading statements, or which do not support an attribute or condition claimed by the Proposer may be cause for rejection of the Proposal. If, in the opinion of the City, such information was intended to mislead the City in its evaluation of the Proposal, it will be cause for rejection of the Proposal.

EVALUATION/EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
Evaluation and selection of Proposals will be based on the information called for in this RFP and as identified in Section IV. Consulting Firm Selection Procedure. Brochures or other promotional presentations beyond that sufficient to submit a complete and effective Proposal are not desired. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or binders, and expensive visuals are not necessary.

Execution of the Agreement, if authorized, will be made within ninety (90) calendar days from the RFP closing date. Proposer agrees and so stipulates in submitting this Proposal, as though stated therein, and in any subsequent execution of Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) that:

1. Agreement, should it be executed, shall be interpreted, construed, and given effect in all respects according to the laws of the State of California.

2. Should Proposer be offered to execute an Agreement, Proposer shall not assign the Agreement, or any part thereof, or any moneys due or to become due there under, without prior consent of the City.

3. Proposer shall hold the City harmless from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for infringement or use of any copyrighted composition, secret process, patented or unpatented invention, article or appliance furnished or used in connection with the contract.

4. Proposer warrants that no gratuities, in the form of gifts, entertainment, or otherwise, were offered or given by the proposer, to any officer or employee of the City with a view toward securing the Agreement or securing favorable treatment with respect to any determination concerning the performance of the contract (Agreement). For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, either in whole or in part. The rights and remedies of the City provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under the contract.

FEES FOR SERVICE GUIDELINES
Proposed fees schedule shall be submitted under separate, sealed cover identified in the fashion as noted in this RFP.

ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT
No assignment by the Consultant of the Agreement or any part hereof or of funds to be received there under, will be binding upon the City unless such assignment had prior written approval and consent of the City. In the event the City gives such consent, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall apply to, and bind the party or parties to whom such work is assigned, sublet or transferred.

TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
The nature of this Agreement requires that the City and the selected Consultant(s) must work closely as a mutually supporting team without conflict. Also, the City needs to be able to terminate this Agreement at any time the City may feel this working relationship has been impaired or should the City no longer have complete confidence and satisfaction in the quality and performance of services by the Consultant(s).

Therefore:

1. This Agreement may be terminated for convenience, without cause by the City, in whole or in part, by giving the Consultant(s) thirty (30) days written notice of the intent to terminate whenever the City determines that termination is in the best interest of the City. Should the Agreement be terminated for convenience, the Consultant(s) shall be paid for all authorized services provided, including reasonable charges for de-mobilization. However, the Consultant(s) shall not be paid any anticipated profit or fees for services not provided.

2. If the Consultant(s) shall fail to provide services or perform satisfactorily the work required by the terms and conditions of the Agreement or materially breaches any of its obligations under this Agreement the City may terminate the Agreement, in whole or in part.

3. Any assignment, subletting or transfer of the interest of the Consultant, either in whole or in part, without the written consent of the City shall be cause for the City to immediately terminate the Agreement for default.

4. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon a single violation of this Agreement.

After receipt of a notice of termination, except as otherwise directed, the Consultant(s) shall stop work on the date of receipt of the notice of termination or other date specified in the notice; place no further orders for services, except as necessary for completion of such portion of the services not terminated; and settle all outstanding liabilities and claims.

In the event the City terminates this Agreement with or without cause, the CITY may procure, upon such terms and such manner as it may determine appropriate services similar to those terminated.

Except with respect to defaults of Sub-consultants, the Consultant shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform this Agreement arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God or of the public enemy, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, and unusually severe weather; but in the event the failure to perform is caused by the default of a Sub-consultant, the Consultant shall not be liable for failure to perform, unless the services to be furnished by the Sub-consultant were obtainable from other sources in sufficient time and within budgeted resources to permit the Consultant to meet the required delivery schedule or other performance requirements.

Should the Agreement be terminated with or without cause, the Consultant shall provide the City with all finished and unfinished documents, data, studies, services, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports, etc., prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement.

Upon termination, with or without cause, Consultant will be compensated for the services satisfactorily completed to the date of the termination according to compensation provisions contained herein. In no event shall the total compensation paid Consultant exceed the total compensation agreed to herein.

If, after notice of termination of this Agreement, as provided for in this article, it is determined for any reason that the Consultant was not in default under the provisions of this article, then the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the Agreement were terminated without cause.

Termination of this Agreement shall not terminate any obligation to indemnify, to maintain and make available any records pertaining to the Agreement, to cooperate with any audit, to be subject to offset, or to make any reports of pre-termination activities.

RIGHT TO REQUIRE PERFORMANCE
The failure of the City at any time to require performance by the selected Consultant(s) of any provisions hereof shall in no way affect the right of the City thereafter to enforce the same. Nor shall waiver by the City of any breach of any provision hereof be taken or held to be waiver of any succeeding breach of such provision or as a waiver of any provision itself.

ETHICS IN PUBLIC CONTRACTING
Each Proposer, by submitting a Proposal, certifies that it is not a party to any collusive action or any action that may be in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act by submitting a Proposal, the Proposer certifies that its Proposal was made without fraud; that it has not offered or received any kickbacks or inducements from any other Proposer in connection with the Request for Proposal; and that it has not conferred on any public employee, public member or public official having responsibility for this procurement transaction, any payment, loan, subscription, advance, deposit of money, services, or anything of more than nominal value.

The Proposer further certifies that no relationship exists between itself and the City or another person or organization that interferes with fair competition or constitutes a conflict of interest with respect to a contract (Agreement) with the City of Tulare.

Prior to the execution of any Agreement, the potential Consultant may be required to certify in writing to the Engineering Division that no relationship exists between the Proposer and any City employee, officer, official or agent that interferes with fair competition or is a conflict of interest with respect to a contract with the City of Tulare.

More than one Proposal from an individual, firm, partnership, corporation or association under the same or different names may be rejected. Reasonable grounds for believing that a Proposer has interest in more than one Proposal for the work solicited may result in rejection of all Proposals in which the proposer is believed to have an interest.

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
In the performance of the services herein provided, the Consultant shall be and is an independent contractor and is not an agent or employee of the City. The Consultant has and shall retain the right to exercise full control and supervision of all persons assisting the Consultant in the performance of said services hereunder. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for all matters relating to the payment of its employees including compliance with social security and income tax withholding and all other regulations governing such matters.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
During the performance of the Agreement, Consultant agrees to the following:

1. Proposer shall comply with all the requirements, when applicable, of the California Fair Employment Practice Commission and provisions of, when applicable, all Federal, State of California, County of Tulare and City of Tulare laws and ordinances related to employment practices.

2. Proposer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, religion, color, gender, age, handicap, national origin or ancestry, except when such a condition is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary for the normal operations of the proposer. Selected Consultants and their Sub-consultants agree to post in conspicuous places, visible to the employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

3. Proposer, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees, placed by, or on behalf of the proposer, shall state that proposer is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

VENUE
Any executed Agreement resulting from this solicitation shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. Venue for any litigation arising out of the Agreement will be vested in Tulare County, California.

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
The SOQs received shall become the property of the City of Tulare and are subject to public disclosure.

Fee schedules and information submitted by proposers will be made available to proposers after City Council has authorized execution of an Agreement. Proposers are to indicate any restrictions on the use of data contained in their responses. Those parts of a SOQ which are defined by the Proposer as business or trade secrets, as that term is defined in California Government Code, Section 6254.7, and are reasonably marked as “Trade Secrets”, “Confidential” or “Proprietary” shall only be disclosed to the public if such disclosure is required or permitted under the California Public Records Act or otherwise by law. Proposers who indiscriminately and without justification identify most, or all, of their SOQ as exempt from disclosure may be deemed non-responsive.

INCURRING COSTS
The City of Tulare is not liable for any cost incurred by proposers in responding to this Request for Proposals.

PRE-AWARD AUDIT
Consultant and sub-consultant agreements in excess of $1,000,000 shall require a pre-award audit as outlined in Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

Master Plan
S A M P L E C O N T R A C T - subject to
changes

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Elk Bayou Nature Preserve Master Plan
This Agreement, entered into this ________ day of ________________, 20____, by and between the City of Tulare, hereinafter referred to as the “CITY”, and ____________________________ hereinafter referred to as the “CONSULTANT”.

W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the CITY is authorized and empowered to employ consultants and specialists in the performance of its duties and functions; and
WHEREAS, the CITY has the desire to secure certain technical and professional services to assist in the preparation and completion of the items of work described as “Scope of Work” in Exhibit “A”, and hereinafter referred to as the “PROJECT”; and

WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents it is licensed, qualified and willing to provide such services pursuant to terms and conditions of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and CONSULTANT agree as follows:

I. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CONSULTANT
A. Authorized Scope of Work: The CONSULTANT agrees to perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to the CITY those tasks described in Exhibit “A” - Scope of Work, for the cost identified in Exhibit “B” - Project Fee.

B. Additional Services: Incidental work related to the PROJECT and not provided for in Exhibit “A” may be needed during the performance of this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees to provide any and all additional services at the rates identified in attached Exhibit “C” - Schedule of Fees for Professional Services. Such additional services shall not be performed by CONSULTANT without the written consent of CITY.

II. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The CONSULTANT shall commence performance of this Agreement within ten (10) days following City’s issuance of Notice to Proceed and shall complete the work within the timeframes outlined in Exhibit “A”, unless otherwise extended in writing by CITY, in its sole discretion.

If the CONSULTANT fails to complete the PROJECT within the time specified, plus any extensions of time which may be granted, the CITY shall determine the percent of each work item completed and shall pay the CONSULTANT on that basis.

CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for delays which are due to causes beyond the CONSULTANT’s reasonable control. In the case of any such delay, the time of completion shall be extended accordingly in writing signed by both parties.

III. COMPENSATION
A. Total Compensation: For services performed pursuant to this Agreement, the CITY agrees to pay and the CONSULTANT agrees to accept, as payment in full, a sum not to exceed _______________________________________ dollars ($ ). This amount shall constitute complete compensation, including document production and out-of-pocket expenses for all services for the work and PROJECT identified in Exhibits “A” and “B”.

B. Payment of Compensation: The CONSULTANT shall be compensated according to the progress payment schedule set forth in Exhibit “D” upon completion of percentage of each noted phase. The CONSULTANT shall be paid no later than thirty (30) days following submission of a written, verified billing to the CITY. Said billing shall include the percentage of each task completed to date and since the date of the preceding billing, if any.

IV. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
A. CITY: The Community Services Director shall represent the CITY in all matters pertaining to the services to be rendered under this Agreement, except where approval of the City Council of the City of Tulare is specifically required.

B. CONSULTANT: shall represent and act as principle for CONSULTANT in all matters pertaining to the services to be rendered by it under this Agreement.

V. TERMINATION
The right to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, may be exercised without prejudice to any other right or remedy to which the terminating party may be entitled at law or under this Agreement.

A. Termination by Either Party Without Cause: The CITY or CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written notice to the other of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination.

B. Termination of Agreement for Cause: The CITY may by written notice to the CONSULTANT specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement in any of the following circumstances:

1. If the CONSULTANT fails to perform the services called for by this Agreement within time(s) specified herein or any extension thereof; or

2. If the CONSULTANT fails to make progress under this Agreement as to endanger performance of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and does not correct such failure within a period of ten (10) days (or longer period as the CITY may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from the CITY specifying such failure.

C. Post-Termination:

1. In the event the CITY terminates this Agreement with or without cause, the CITY may procure, upon such terms and such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

2. Except with respect to defaults of sub consultants, the CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform this Agreement arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the CONSULTANT. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God or of the public enemy, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, and unusually severe weather; but in the event the failure to perform is caused by the default of a sub consultant, the CONSULTANT shall not be liable for failure to perform, unless the services to be furnished by the sub consultant were obtainable from other sources in sufficient time and within budgeted resources to permit the CONSULTANT to meet the required delivery schedule or other performance requirements.

3. Should the Agreement be terminated with or without cause, the CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with all finished and unfinished documents, data, studies, services, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports, etc., prepared by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

4. Upon termination, with or without cause, CONSULTANT will be compensated for the services satisfactorily completed to the date of termination according to compensation provisions contained herein. In no event, shall the total compensation paid CONSULTANT exceed the total compensation agreed to herein.

5. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement, as provided for in this article, it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default under the provisions of this article, then the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the Agreement was terminated without cause.

6. Termination of this Agreement shall not terminate any obligation to indemnify, to maintain and make available any records pertaining to the Agreement, to cooperate with any audit, to be subject to offset, or to make any reports of pretermination activities.

VI. INTEREST OF OFFICIALS AND THE CONSULTANT
A. No officer, member, or employee of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in the review or approval of this Agreement shall:

1. Participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which effects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which he has, directly or indirectly, any interest; or

2. Have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof during his tenure or for one year thereafter.

B. The CONSULTANT hereby covenants that they have, at the time of the execution of this Agreement, no interest, and that he shall not acquire any interest in the future, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this work, no person having any such interest shall be employed.

VII. NO PERSONNEL AGENCY, COMMISSION, OR CONTINGENT
FEE
The CONSULTANT warrants, by execution of this Agreement, that no personnel agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee, excepting bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the CONSULTANT for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, the CITY shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from this Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.

IX. SUBCONTRACTING
A. The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract or otherwise assign any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the CITY.

B. In no event shall the CONSULTANT subcontract work in excess of 50% of the contract amount, excluding specialized services. Specialized services are those items not ordinarily furnished by a consultant performing the particular type of project.

C. All subcontracts exceeding $25,000 shall contain all provisions required of the prime contract.

X. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
In the performance of the services herein provided for, the CONSULTANT shall be, and is, an independent contractor and is not an agent or employee of the CITY. The CONSULTANT has and shall retain the right to exercise full control and supervision of all persons assisting the CONSULTANT in the performance of said services hereunder. The CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for all matters relating to the payment of its employees including compliance with social security and income tax withholding and all other regulations governing such matters.

XI. SPECIFICATIONS
All specifications, manuals, standards, etc., either attached to this Agreement or incorporated by reference, are binding as to the performance of the work specified in this Agreement unless they are changed by written amendment to this Agreement modified in writing to incorporate such changes.

XII. DOCUMENTS/DATA
A. Ownership of Documents: All original papers and documents, produced as a result of this Agreement, shall become the property of the CITY. In addition, CITY shall be provided with access and use of any other papers and documents consistent with the purpose and scope of services covered by this Agreement. Any additional copies, not otherwise provided for herein, shall be the responsibility of the CITY.

Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by CITY or others on extensions of the PROJECT or on any other project. Any use of the completed documents for other projects and any use of incomplete documents without the specific written authorization from CONSULTANT will be at CITY’s sole risk and without liability to CONSULTANT. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to CONSULTANT’s deliverables under this Agreement by CITY or persons other than CONSULTANT is waived as against CONSULTANT, and the CITY assumes full responsibility for such changes unless the CITY has given CONSULTANT prior notice and has received from CONSULTANT written consent for such changes.

B. Publication: No report, information, or other data given or prepared or assembled by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, shall be made available to any individual or organization by the CONSULTANT without the prior written approval of the CITY. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the CONSULTANT shall not be required to protect or hold in confidence and confidential information which (1) is or becomes available to the public with the prior written consent of the CITY; (2) must be disclosed to comply with law; or (3) must be disclosed in connection with any legal proceedings.

C. Copyrights: The CONSULTANT shall be free to copyright material developed under this Agreement with the provision that the CITY (and any funding agency) be given a nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use the material for government or public purposes.

D. Patent Rights: Applicable patent rights provisions described in 41 CFR 1-9.1 regarding rights to inventions shall apply to this agreement.

XIII. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
A. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses, including legal Consultant’s fees and costs but only to the extent the Consultant (and its Subconsultants), are responsible for such damages, liabilities and costs on a comparative basis of fault between the Consultant (and its Subconsultants) and the City in the performance of professional services under this agreement.

B. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including legal Consultant’s fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or City for which Consultant is legally liable, including, but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Consultant.

C. Without limiting CITY’s right to indemnification, it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall secure prior to commencing any activities under this Agreement, and maintain during the term of this Agreement, insurance coverage as follows:

1. Workers’ compensation insurance: Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000). Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers

2. General liability insurance: Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Consultant’s general liability policies shall be primary and shall not seek contribution from the City’s coverage and be endorsed using Insurance Services Office form CG 20 10 (or equivalent) to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall be additional insureds under such policies.

3. Professional liability insurance: Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions that may be made in performing the Services to be rendered in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this agreement, and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three years after completion of the services required by this agreement.

4. Auto liability insurance: Consultant shall provide auto liability coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired autos using ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01, or the exact equivalent, with a limit of no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident.

5. CITY’S Risk Manager is hereby authorized to reduce the requirements set forth above in the event he/she determines that such reduction is in the CITY’S best interest.

6. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall contain the following clause:

7. “This insurance shall not be canceled, limited in scope or coverage, or nonrenewed until after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City Clerk, City of Tulare, 411 East Kern Avenue, Tulare, CA 93274.” D. CITY’S Risk Manager is hereby authorized to reduce the requirements set forth above in the event he/she determines that such reduction is in the CITY’S best interest.

E. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall contain the following clause:
“This insurance shall not be canceled, limited in scope or coverage, or nonrenewed until after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City Clerk, City of Tulare, 411 East Kern Avenue, Tulare, CA 93274.” In addition, the commercial general liability and comprehensive automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following clauses:
“It is agreed that any insurance maintained by the City of Tulare shall apply in excess of and not contribute with insurance provided by this policy.” “The City of Tulare, its officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers are added as additional insured as respects operations and activities of, or on behalf of the named insured, performed under contract with the City of Tulare.”
F. Prior to commencing any work under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall deliver to CITY insurance certificates confirming the existence of the insurance required by this Agreement, and including the applicable clauses referenced above. Within thirty (30) days of the execution date of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY endorsements to the above-required policies, which add to these policies the applicable clauses referenced above. Said endorsements shall be signed by an authorized representative of the insurance company and shall include the signatory’s company affiliation and title. Should it be deemed necessary by CITY, it shall be CONSULTANT’s responsibility to see that CITY receives documentation acceptable to CITY which sustains that the individual signing said endorsements is indeed authorized to do so by the insurance company. CITY has the right to demand, and to receive within a reasonable time period, copies of any insurance policies required under this Agreement.

G. In addition to any other remedies CITY may have if CONSULTANT fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, CITY may, at its sole option:

1. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement; or

2. Order CONSULTANT to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to CONSULTANT hereunder until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; or

3. Terminate this Agreement.

Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies CITY may have and is not the exclusive remedy for CONSULTANT’s failure to maintain insurance or secure appropriate endorsements.

Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which CONSULTANT may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from CONSULTANT’s or its subconsultant’s performance of the work covered under this Agreement.

XIV. NON-DISCRIMINATION
CONSULTANT and all subconsultants shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the consultant to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Agreement, which may result in the termination of this Agreement.

XV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Asbestos and Hazardous Materials: In providing its services hereunder, CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for identification, handling, containment, abatement, or in any other respect, for any asbestos or hazardous material if such is present in connection with the PROJECT. In the event the CITY becomes aware of the presence of asbestos or hazardous material at the jobsite, CITY shall be responsible for complying with all applicable federal and state rules and regulations, and shall immediately notify CONSULTANT, who shall then be entitled to cease any of its services that may be affected by such presence, without liability to CONSULTANT arising there from.

B. Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of any successors to or assigns of the parties.

C. Prohibition of Assignment: Neither the CITY nor CONSULTANT shall assign, delegate or transfer their rights and duties in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party.

D. Dispute/Governing Law: Any dispute not resolvable by informal arbitration between the parties to this Agreement shall be adjudicated in a Court of Law under the laws of the State of California.

E. Notices: Notice shall be sufficient hereunder if personally served upon the City Clerk of the CITY or an officer or principal of the CONSULTANT, or if sent via the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF TULARE:
411 East Kern Avenue
Tulare, CA 93274
Attention: City Clerk
CONSULTANT:

F. Jurisdiction/Venue/Waiver Of Removal: This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in that State. Any action brought to interpret or enforce this Agreement, or any of the terms or conditions hereof, shall be brought in Tulare County, California. The CONSULTANT hereby expressly waives any right to remove any action to a county other than Tulare County as permitted pursuant to Section 394 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.

G. Integration/Modification: This Agreement and each of the exhibits referenced herein, which are incorporated by reference, represents the entire understanding of the CITY and the CONSULTANT as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by the CITY and the CONSULTANT.

H. Conflict With Law: If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with said law, but the remainder of the Agreement shall be in full force and effect.

I. Attorney’s Fees: In the event either party commences any action, arbitration or legal proceedings for the enforcement of this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the court or arbitrator, shall be entitled to recovery of its attorney’s fees and court costs incurred in the action brought thereon.

J. Construction: This Agreement is the product of negotiation and compromise on the part of each party and the parties agree, notwithstanding Civil Code Section 1654 that in the event of uncertainty the language will not be construed against the party causing the uncertainty to exist.

K. Authority: Each signatory to this Agreement represents that it is authorized to enter into this Agreement and to bind the party to which its signature represents.

L. Headings: Section headings are provided for organizational purposes only and do not in any manner affect the scope or intent of the provisions there under.

XVI. ADDITIONAL MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Record Retention: The City, State, or their duly authorized representatives shall have access to any documents, books, papers, and records of the consultant (which are directly pertinent to the project) for the purpose of making an audit, examination, excerpts, and transcripts. The consultant shall maintain all required records for at least three (3) years after final payment on the project and all pending matters are closed. This also applies to all subcontracts in excess of $25,000.

B. Cost Principals: Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq., are the governing factors regarding allowable elements of cost. Administrative requirements are set forth in 49 CFR, Part 18 Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. This also applies to all subcontracts in excess of $25,000.

C. Changes in Work: If changes in scope, character, or complexity become desirable or necessary as work progresses, adjustments to the agreement may be made in writing signed by the CITY and CONSULTANT. In special cases, where it is essential that extra work be performed immediately, execution of the supplemental agreement covering the changes will be accomplished as soon as possible. This agreement shall provide for the preparation and submittal of contract change orders when applicable. There shall be no charge to the City when the change order is required to correct errors or omissions by the Service Provider
D. General Compliance with Laws and Wage Rates: CONSULTANT shall be required to comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work.

This includes compliance with prevailing wage rates and their payment in accordance with California Labor Code, Section 1775.

E. Compliance with the Copland “Anti-Kickback” Act (18 USC 874): CONSULTANT is prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person involved in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he/she is otherwise entitled (all suspected or reported violations shall be reported to the City).

F. Consultant’s Endorsement: The responsible CONSULTANT shall sign plans, specifications, and estimates and engineering data furnished by him/her and where appropriate, indicate his/her California engineering registration number.

G. Clean Air and Water: Applicable to Contracts in Excess of $100,000.

1. Definition. “Facility” means a building, plant, installation, structure, mine, vessel, or other floating craft, location, or site of operations, owned, leased, or supervised by the Consultant or and subconsultant, used in the performance of the Contract or any subcontract. When a location or site of operations includes more than one building, plant, installation, or structure, the entire location or site shall be deemed a facility except when the Administrator, or a designee, of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determines that independent facilities are collocated in one geographical area.

2. In compliance with regulations issued by the EPA, 2 C.F.R, part 1532, pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. §. 7401 et seq.); the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.); and Executive Order 11738, the Consultant agrees to:
a) Not utilize any facility in the performance of this contract or any subcontract which is listed on the EPA List of Violating Facilities pursuant to 2 C.F.R. part 1532 for the duration of time that the facility remains on the list;
b) Promptly notify the Owner if a facility the Consultant intends to use in the performance of this contract is on the EPA List of Violating Facilities of the Consultant knows that it has been recommended to be placed on the List;
c) Comply with all requirements of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, including the requirements of section 114 of the Clean Air Act and section 308 of the Federal Water Pollution control Act, and all applicable clean air and clean water standards.

H. Equal Employment Opportunity:

The Consultant shall be required to comply with Executive Order 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR Part 60).

1. The Recipient hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work, or modification thereof, as defined in the regulations of the Secretary of Labor at 41 C.F.R. chapter 60, the following equal opportunity clause:

During the performance of this contract, the Consultant agrees as follows:
a) The Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

The Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. b) The Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
c) The Consultant will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers representatives of the Consultant’s commitments hereunder, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
d) The Consultant will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
e) The Consultant will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and pursuant to rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor and will permit access to its books, records, and accounts by the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
f) In the event of the Consultant's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this Contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this Contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally-assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. g) The Consultant will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph 17(a) (1) and the provisions of paragraphs 17(a)(1) through (6) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subconsultant or vendor. The Consultant will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as EDA or the Secretary of Labor may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in or is threatened with litigation with or by a subconsultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the Secretary of Labor, the Consultant may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. h) The Recipient further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally-assisted construction work. Provided, however, that if the Recipient so participating is a State or local government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision of such government that does not participate in work on or under the Contract.
i) The Recipient agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of consultants and subconsultants with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist in securing compliance.
j) The Recipient further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a Consultant debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon consultants and subconsultants by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive order.

2. Exemptions to Above Equal Opportunity Clause (41 C.F.R. chapter 60):
a) Contracts and subcontracts not exceeding $10,000 (other than Government bills of lading) are exempt. The amount of the Contract, rather than the amount of the federal financial assistance, shall govern in determining the applicability of this exemption.
b) Except in the case of subconsultants for the performance of construction work at the site of construction, the clause shall not be required to be inserted in subcontracts below the second tier. c) Contracts and subcontracts not exceeding $10,000 for standard commercial supplies or raw materials are exempt.

I. Monthly Reporting: The Contractor/Consultant shall submit a report on a monthly basis to the City covering the general progress of the job and describing any problems or factors being experienced.

J. Federal Non-Discrimination Statutes:

The Service Provider must comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to:

1. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L.88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin;

2. Section 112 of PL 92-45 and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683, and 1685-1686) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex;

3. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C.794) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps;

4. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C.6101-6107) which prohibits discrimination because of age;

5. The Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 93-255), as amended, relating to non-discrimination on the basis of drug abuse;

6. The Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L.91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism;

7. Sections 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42U.S.C. 290 dd-3 and 290ee-3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records;

8. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601 et. seq.), as amended, relating to non-discrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing;

9. Any other non-discrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which the application for Federal assistance is being made; and

10. The requirements of any other non-discrimination statute(s) which may apply.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF TULARE: CONSULTANT:
___________________________ ___________________________ City Manager
Attest:
___________________________
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
___________________________
City Attorney
Attachments:

Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C