Agenda packet — Turlock City Council, April 14, 2026 (part 3 of 3)

F:\22projects\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP\TO#4\Working Documents\Contracts and Proposals\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP_Scope and Fee Task 4_Ver 1.docx
PAGE - 4 -
Assumptions to Task
The scope of services presented above for task 3 was developed based on our knowledge of the project requirements and the following assumptions:

• The field exploration will be under the direct supervision of our staff. This task is estimated to take up to 6 workdays. • Excess cuttings or non-cohesive soils will be used to backfill the hole and will be topped with at least 6 inches of cold patch asphalt.
• The exploration assumes access will be provided by the City. Work will be performed within the existing roadway at locations mutually agreeable to you and so that existing utilities are not impacted. • Work will be performed with conventional, portable hand coring rigs and/or truck mounted drill rigs, if needed. • Laboratory testing frequency and type may vary based on the actual conditions encountered. • Siegfried staff will utilize the appropriate personal protective equipment typical for performing drilling services for geotechnical investigations.

TASK 4, 5, 6 & 7 – PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE (30%, 60% 90% and 100%/Bid)

1. Siegfried shall produce the project improvement plans.

A. At 30% submittal, Siegfried shall review of existing streetlighting vs. Standard Drawings E-6 through E-8, to identify if the existing meets the standards and where the deficiencies are. If any design is required, an amendment will be added for the additional scope.

B. At 30% submittal Siegfried shall present the City PM with preferred design however shall also include some cost savings options as necessary to lower the project cost.

C. Based upon the topographic survey and the approved areas of improvement, Siegfried will prepare the Project civil improvement plans including the following:
1) Cover Sheet.
2) Notes Sheet.
3) Topography and Demolition Plan.
4) Paving Plan.
5) Drainage and Grading Plan, in accordance with the American Disability Act (ADA). 6) Underground utilities, coordination with utility companies and agencies. 7) Alignment, dimensions and paving legend usable for construction staking. 8) All details necessary to clarify the plan intent are included and will be part of the plan set. 9) Cross Sections, as required by the City.
10) Striping Plan (no traffic signal is anticipated) and Traffic Control Plans 11) Prepare the Project Infrastructure Construction Erosion Control Plan only for erosion control during the construction of the improvements shown in Siegfried's plans, including best management practices (BMP's), but excluding a detailed non-visible pollutant monitoring and testing plan.

2. Cost estimate for the project areas depicted in attached Exhibits.

3. Review drainage and potential connections to the existing drainage system where necessary.

4. Within the scoped area, review the items listed in the project description to identify which improvements will be included in the project plans with the City staff.

5. Assist the City with the project specifications.

6. Siegfried shall write technical sections to be included in the City template, Siegfried will review the final version of the specifications to confirm that they adequately cover the work and bid items. Siegfried shall sign the plans and the specifications.

Page 930 of 1016 ends

F:\22projects\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP\TO#4\Working Documents\Contracts and Proposals\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP_Scope and Fee Task 4_Ver 1.docx
PAGE - 5 -
TASK 8 – BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION

1. Answering questions during bidding process.

2. Review construction submittals and RFIs.

3. Attending kick off meeting with the contractor and City.

4. Coordination with the City PM on questions during construction and site meetings as necessary during construction.

TASK 9 – RECORD OF SURVEY FOR MONUMENT PRESERVATION (PRE-CONSTRUCTION)

1. Based on the requirement that a Monument Preservation Survey be submitted as part of the City of Turlock Encroachment Permit, Siegfried will prepare and submit a Record of Survey for the purpose of a Pre-Construction Monument Preservation Survey.

2. Siegfried will research and review record maps and title documents.

3. Siegfried will survey and record existing monuments within the Project area.

4. Siegfried will perform a limited topographic survey of existing surface features as necessary to confirm location of right-of-way lines.

5. Siegfried will establish the rights-of-way within the project area as described in the Project Description and include this determination in the Survey.

6. Siegfried will facilitate the map check review and recording of the Survey with the City of Turlock Engineering Division.

7. This task does not cover plan check and/or submittal fees.

TASK 10 – RECORD OF SURVEY FOR MONUMENT PRESERVATION (POST-CONSTRUCTION)

2. Siegfried will survey and record existing monuments within the Project area.

3. Siegfried will note and re-establish monuments that have been disturbed due to construction activities, if any, and include them in the Survey.

4. Siegfried will facilitate the map check review and recording of the Survey with the City of Turlock Engineering Division.

5. This task does not cover plan check and/or submittal fees.

EXCEPTIONS TO THE SCOPE
It is understood that the following are not included in the scope:
a. map application and checking and recordation fees, permits, b. preliminary title reports,
c. displaying (mapping of) irrigation system features,
d. any site-specific safety, biology or other training or orientation. e. ALTA Survey and construction staking,
f. hazardous waste testing, monitoring and contingency plan for both site and building demolition work,
g. Phase I Environmental Assessment, Phase II Subsurface Investigation, and asbestos and lead containing material investigation and report,
h. infiltration testing,
i. CEQA/NEPA/EIR
j. permit applications and fees,

Page 931 of 1016 ends

F:\22projects\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP\TO#4\Working Documents\Contracts and Proposals\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP_Scope and Fee Task 4_Ver 1.docx
PAGE - 6 -
k. construction management, inspection, supervision and scheduling, l. gas, electric and telephone service plans,
m. tentative maps, parcel maps, final maps and legal descriptions and sketches, n. title reports,
o. SWPPP, QSD & QSP services.

Limits of Work
The project limits extend as indicated on the attached Exhibits.

II. Fee Proposal
We look forward to working with you and the City. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to call me directly. We will commence work upon your authorization to proceed and the execution of your contract documents.

Sincerely,
____________________________
Adam K. Merrill, P.E., QSD, QSP
Vice President
C76826

SIEGFRIED

Table 2: Estimated Fee
Task Description Total
1 Meetings & Coordination $18,181.78
2A Topographic Survey & Research $65,758.82
2B Potholing (15 potholes) $20,000.00
3 Pavement Testing & Design $33,282.91
4 30% Plans & Estimate $62,800.99
5 60% PS&E Submittal $44,761.33
6 90% PS&E Submittal $44,761.33
7 Final Bid Package/100% PS&E Submittal $16,188.76
8 Bidding & Construction Administration $20,008.68
9 Preconstruction Monument Preservation and ROS $26,265.74 10 Postconstruction Monument Preservation and ROS $17,467.68 TOTAL FEE $369,478.02

Page 932 of 1016 ends

F:\22projects\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP\TO#4\Working Documents\Contracts and Proposals\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP_Scope and Fee Task 4_Ver 1.docx
PAGE - 7 -
Table 1: Streets Identified for Task 4 Rehabilitation
Street Name From To PCI Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
District
E. Minnesota Ave. Geer Rd. Bucknell St 18 807 38 3
E. Minnesota Ave. Bucknell St. Greenboro St. 39 528 37 3 E. Minnesota Ave. Greenboro St. N. Olive Ave. 25 1292 37 3 E. Minnesota Ave. N. Olive Ave. Colorado Ave. 14 1309 25 3 Bucknell St. E. Tuolumne Rd. E. Minnesota Ave. 86 617 33 3 Annhurst Ave. E. Tuolumne Rd. E. Minnesota Ave. 85 620 33 3 Brooks Ct. E. Minnesota Ave. North End 11 531 32 3
Greenboro St. E. Tuolumne Rd. E. Minnesota Ave. 87 620 32 3 Total Length = 6,324 LF

Page 933 of 1016 ends

City of Turlock Road CIP
TO#4 Project Limits
Turlock, CA
2/10/2026
NOT TO SCALE GEER RD BUCKNELL ST ANNHURST AVE GREENBORO ST N. OLIVE AVE BROOKS CT E. MINNESOTA AVE
E. TUOLUMNE RD
E. MINNESOTA AVE
E. TUOLUMNE RD N. OLIVE AVE GEER RDCOLORADO AVE COLORADO AVE

Page 934 of 1016 ends

1 CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ■ SURVEYING ■ PLANNING ■ ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 100 Sycamore Avenue, Suite 100, Modesto, CA 95354 ■ (t) 209.762.3580 (f) 209.942.0214 ■ siegfriedeng.com OVER 70 YEARS OF SERVICE

RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL

ERIN CAHOON
Public Outreach
Erin brings over 25 years over experience in marketing, public outreach, and graphic design. As a practical artist, creative thinker, and problem solver, she can visualize and conceptualize complex ideas and make them visually appealing and easy to digest. Her public outreach approach keeps communication at the forefront and she utilizes her strong design background to bridge the divide between engineering concepts to digestible information that stakeholders can understand.

JORI LEMMING, PE, SE
Structural Engineer (As-Needed)
Jori Lemmon is a structural engineer with 20 years of
experience in all construction materials and specializes in seismic design and construction practices. Jori is
experienced with collaboration across multiple locations for project work and communicating with various disciplines. She has worked on numerous public and private projects, including military, health care, seismic retrofit, correctional and educational facilities.

BOB NORBUTAS, PLA
Landscape Architect (As-Needed)
Robert successfully manages and directs a broad
range of projects, providing oversight and leadership
to some of Siegfried’s largest projects. His top priority is interacting with clients to understand their needs and ensure their projects are user-focused and transformative.

JOY BHATTACHARYA, PE, PTOE
AMG | Traffic Engineering (As-Needed)
Joy is AMG’s Vice President of Innovative
Transportation Solutions. He has in-depth experience
in the development, design and implementation of various engineering strategies in major metropolitan areas, including Adaptive/Responsive Traffic Signal Systems and Transit Priority Systems; Incident Management Plans; design of automated Electronic Toll Collection systems; preparation of PS&E for field implementation of CCTV, Changeable Message Signs, Highway Advisory Radio, Ramp Metering and ATMS systems; and freeway and arterial operations using microsimulation.

ADAM MERRILL, PE, QSD/QSP
Project Manager/Lead Civil Engineer
Adam is recognized for his technical abilities and
broad knowledge when it comes to civil engineering
infrastructure projects. His duties include client
management, planning, designing, preparing reports, and participating in and directing public outreach efforts to ensure community and project stakeholder consensus.

KEVIN GENASCI, PLS
Lead Survey Manager
Kevin’s clients benefit from his extensive experience in both the field and office. He specializes in surveys to support the design of residential subdivisions, commercial site developments, industrial site developments, and municipal infrastructure projects. His expertise includes topographic surveying and mapping, boundary surveying, construction surveying, site development, and municipal infrastructure design support.

BRADFORD QUON, PE, GE
Lead Geotechnical Engineer
Brad has over 24 years of geotechnical engineering
design and construction experience for infrastructure,
earthwork, and flood control projects. His geotechnical engineering experience includes performing field explorations, laboratory testing of soils, geotechnical engineering analysis (i.e. shallow and deep foundations, retaining structures, slope stability, and seepage analyses), and geotechnical investigation report preparation.

ANDREW MANES, PE
Civil Engineer
Andrew has been a key piece working with the Siegfried
team, and his knowledge and specialty of roadway
work, bike lanes, and pedestrian safety features have
him working on a variety of civil projects from civic enhancements to higher education path of travel projects. He has been the go-to for our team in being able to design projects from scratch, or bring older designs to code.

PROJECT MANAGER (PM)
Adam Merrill, PE, QSD/QSP
Lead Civil Engineer

KEY TEAM MEMBERS
Kevin Genasci, PLS
Lead Survey Manager
Bradford Quon, PE, GE
Lead Geotechnical Engineer

SUBCONSULTANTS
Joy Bhattacharya, PE, PTOE
AMG | Traffic Engineering (As-Needed) TEAM ROLES

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Andrew Manes, PE
Civil Engineer
Erin Cahoon
Public Outreach
Jori Lemmon, PE, SE
Structural Engineer (As-Needed)
Bob Norbutas
Landscape Architect (As-Needed)

KEY TEAM MEMBERS

SUPPORT STAFF

Page 935 of 1016 ends

Siegfried Engineering, Inc.

Principal
Civil
Engineer
Principal
Survey
Manager
Principal
Geotech
Engineer
Senior
Associate
Geotech
Associate
Civil
Project
Engineer Engineer II Engineer I
Associate
Engineer
Technician
(PW)
Engineer I
Associate
Engineer
Technician
(PW)
Senior
Technician
Technician
I
Technician
(PW)
Project
Land
Surveyor
Surveyor
II Surveyor I Survey Tech III Survey Tech II Party Chief Adam
Merrill
Kevin
Genasci Brad Quon Charley Scott Lorrane Cayllahua Andrew Manes Jose Ruvalcaba Alejandro Aguilera Alejandro Aguilera Cameron Scott Cameron Scott Greg Samoy RJ Teel RJ Teel Dani Cano Manny DaBranca Scott Soares Daniel Duran Dalton Reed Diego Moreno $90.00 $90.00 $90.00 $80.00 $72.76 $56.74 $43.70 $36.97 $78.91 $43.27 $78.91 $44.95 $30.02 $72.91 $64.91 $55.37 $41.00 $38.95 $33.00 $87.77 $280.49 $280.49 $280.49 $249.32 $226.76 $176.83 $136.19 $115.22 $245.92 $134.85 $245.92 $140.09 $93.56 $227.23 $202.29 $172.56 $127.78 $121.39 $102.85 $273.54 1 Meetings & Coordination 36 4 4 4 12 12 72 $18,181.782 Topogrpahic Survey & Research 10 16 16 16 16 24 24 32 24 24 80 80 362 $65,758.823 Pavement Testing & Design 20 40 20 8 20 8 40 8 164 $30,078.914 30% Plans & Estimate 20 80 80 80 100 360 $62,800.995 60% PS&E Submittal 20 50 40 70 80 260 $44,761.336 90% PS&E Submittal 20 50 40 70 80 260 $44,761.337 Final Bid Package/100% PS&E Submittal 10 16 16 20 30 92 $16,188.768 Bidding & Construction Admin 20 20 20 30 16 106 $20,008.689 Preconstruction Monument Preservation amd RW 4 16 20 15 20 15 10 24 124 $24,213.74 10 Postconstruction Monument Preservation 4 8 12 10 10 10 10 16 80 $15,415.68 Proposal Subtotal 144 44 24 44 244 224 286 20 8 20 8 330 40 8 56 57 54 49 100 120 1880 $342,170.02 Sub Services or ODC
A City Rise - Traffic Control Flagmen (Part of Task 3) $2,180 $2,180.00 B CTS - Lab Testing Support $1,024 $1,024.00C Potholing, 15 locations assumed (Part of Task 2B) $20,000 $20,000.00 D Precon ROS (Part of Task 9) $2,052 $2,052.00
E Postcon ROS (Part of Task 10) $2,052 $2,052.00
Total Sub Services $27,308 $27,308.00Total Including Sub Services $369,478.02 Notes:
1 SEI
Overhead Rate 59.48%Fringe Rate 68.31%General and Administrative Rate 55.53%Fee Rate 10.00% Tasks Labor
Total Labor
Costs
Total
Hrs
Task Description (Change task titles as detailed in the scope of work)
Task #
2/25/2026 1/1

Page 936 of 1016 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Consultant
Project No. Federal Contract No. Date 2/23/2026

DIRECT LABOR
hours Actual Hourly Rate Total
144 $90.00 $12,960.00
44 $90.00 $3,960.00
24 $90.00 $2,160.00
44 $80.00 $3,520.00
244 $72.76 $17,753.44
224 $56.74 $12,709.76
286 $43.70 $12,498.20
20 $36.97 $739.40
8 $78.91 $631.28
20 $43.27 $865.40
8 $78.91 $631.28
330 $44.95 $14,833.50
40 $30.02 $1,200.80
8 $72.91 $583.28
56 $64.91 $3,634.96
57 $55.37 $3,156.09
54 $41.00 $2,214.00
49 $38.95 $1,908.55
100 $33.00 $3,300.00
120 $87.77 $10,532.40

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $109,792.34
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for sample) $0.00 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $109,792.34

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 68.31% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits 74999.14745 f) Overhead (Rate: 59.48% g) Overhead [(c)x(f)] 65304.48383 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 55.53%) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] 60967.6864 j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)] $201,271.32
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED PROFIT [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% $31,106.37 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary Description of Item Quantity Unit(s) Unit Cost Total
Mileage Costs 0 $0.575 $0.00
Equipment Rental and Supplies $0.00
Potholing $20,000.00
Precon ROS Fee $2,052.00
Postcon ROS Fee $2,052.00
1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $24,104.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: City Rise - Traffic Control $2,180.00
Subconsultant 2: CTS - Lab Testing $1,024.00
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS: $3,204.00
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS $27,308.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (p)] $369,478.02
NOTES:
1 Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**).

All costs must comply with the Federal cost principals. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2 The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3 Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Surveyor II
Surveyor I
Survey Tech III
Dani Cano
Manny DaBranca
Scott Soares
Daniel Duran
Engineer I(PW) Alejandro Aguilera
Technician I RJ Teel
Project Land Surveyor
Engineer I Cameron Scott
Engineer I(PW) Cameron Scott
Kevin Genasci
Principal Geotechnical Engineer Brad Quon
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL PAGE 1 OF 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
Siegfried Engineering
Classification/Title Name
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant PIC/PM/Civil Lead Adam Merrill
Principal Survey Manager
Lorrane Cayllahua
Party Chief Diego Moreno
Technician (PW) RJ Teel
Engineer II Jose Ruvalcaba
Senior Technician Greg Samoy
Survey Tech II Dalton Reed
Project Engineer Andrew Manes
Engineer I Alejandro Aguilera
Senior Associate Geotech Charley Scott
Associate Civil
January 2020
x

Page 937 of 1016 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$109,792.34 = $58.40 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $58.40 + = $58.40 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $58.40 + = $58.40 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $58.40 + = $58.40 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $58.40 + = $58.40 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 1880.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 1880.0
Year 1 $58.40 * = $109,792.34 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $58.40 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $58.40 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
= $109,792.34
= $109,792.34
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1 This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2 An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology) 3 This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4 Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be approved. (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
0%
Direct Labor Subtotal
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
Total Hours
1880
Proposed Escalation
0%
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL PAGE 2 OF 2

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
0 (calculated above)
Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
1880
0 Estimated hours
1880.0
1880.0
Cost per Year
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 1880.0
Total

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) 1880.0
1880.0
0%
0%
Total Hours
per Cost ProposalCompleted Each Year
Estimated %
January 2020

Page 938 of 1016 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Certification of Direct Costs:

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contract

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principals and Procedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services

6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accouting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Title:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email: Phone Number:

Address:
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a levelno lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

List of services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Adam Merrill
[email protected]
100 Sycamore Ave, #100, Modesto, CA 95354
Principal/Vice President
2/23/2026
(209) 499-8239
January 2020

Page 939 of 1016 ends

Page 940 of 1016 ends

Page 941 of 1016 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-H3
Cost Proposal
EXHIBIT 10-HJ COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 2

COST PER UNIT OF WORK CONTRACTS
(GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIAL TESTING)
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed □ Prime Consultant □ Subconsultant □ 2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant __________________ _
Project No. _________ _ Contract No. --------- Date ------- Unit/Item of Work:
(Example: Log of Test Boring for Soils Report, or ADL Testing for Hazardous Waste Material Study} Include as many Items as necessary.

DIRECT LABOR Hours Billing Hourly Rate {$) Total{$)
Professional {Classification)*
Sub-professional/Technical**
EQUIPMENT 1 {with Operator)
EQUIPMENT 2 {with Operator)
Consultant's Other Direct Costs (ODC)- Itemize:

Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Subconsultant 1:

Subconsultant 2:

Subconsultant 3:

Subconsultant 4:

Subconsultant 5:

Nole: Attach addtllonal pages if necessary.

TOTAL COST PER UNIT OF WORK
NOTES:
1 . Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (
**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. The cost proposal format shall not be amended.

2. Hourly billing rates should include prevailing wage rates and be consistent with publicly advertised rates charged to all clients (Commercial, Private or Public).

3. Mobilization/De-mobilization is based on site location and number and frequency of tests/items.

4. ODC items shall be based on actual costs and supported by historical data and other documentation.

5. ODC items that would be considered "tools of the trade' are not reimbursable.

6. Billing Hourly Rates must be actual, allowable, and reasonable.

Page 8 of 9 ends

January 2020

Page 942 of 1016 ends

________________________________ _
_ _

SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL
Sample Only - Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL 3
Certification of Direct Costs:

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal{s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

13. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles {GAAP)

14. Terms and conditions of the contract

15. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

16. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

17. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

18. 48 Code of Federal Regulation Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board {when applicable)
All costs must be applied consistently and fair1y to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements.

Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name:_______________ Title*: _____________
Signature: _____________ _ Date of Certification {mm/dd/yyyy...._:

Email: _______________ Phone Number,_,_: __________
Address:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

List services the consultant is providinq under the proposed contract:

Page 2 of 2 ends

Manager

Page 943 of 1016 ends

Page 1 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-111, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 5 AMENDMENT NO. 5 FOR TASK ORDER NO. 5
Under the Terms of the

MASTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TURLOCK
and
SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC.
for
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES (City Contract No. 2023-111) City Project No. 26-018
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 for Task Order No. 5 under the terms of City Contract No. 2023-111 is entered into by and between the CITY OF TURLOCK, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC., a California corporation (“Professional”), on this _______ day of _______ 2026 (the “Effective Date of Task Order No. 5”).

City and Professional may be collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” or individually as “Party.” There are no other parties to this Amendment No. 5.

WHEREAS, the Parties hereto previously entered into a Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2023-111) dated April 25, 2023, for engineering design services to assist City with Design Services for Roads Program Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Agreement stipulates that the scope of services and fees associated with specific projects will be agreed upon through task orders approved under the terms of Agreement by a written amendment to the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 5 provides the scope of services, associated fees, and schedule for specific projects under City Project No. 26-018 “Siegfried Task Order No. 5 for Roads Program CIP Projects.”
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Exhibit F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby added to the Agreement.

2. Recital B of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

B. Professional has made a proposal to City to provide such professional services. A description of the services Professional proposes to provide is included in the Scope of Services in Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated

Page 944 of 1016 ends

Page 2 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-111, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 5 herein by reference (“Services”). City desires to retain Professional to perform the Services, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

3. Recital C of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

C. The Parties anticipate that one or more projects for Services shall be determined through creation of a Task Order as a City-requested modification of services under Section 5.2 of this Agreement which shall be approved by written amendment to this Agreement. The Parties shall outline the schedule or timeline for providing the Services agreed upon under each Task Order (“Completion Schedule”), which shall be included in one or more written amendments to this Agreement. Such Completion Schedule is included in Exhibit F.

4. Recital D of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

D. The Parties shall outline the rates and method of payment to Professional for its performance of the Services under this Agreement as determined under each Task Order (“Compensation Schedule”), which shall be included in one or more written amendments to this Agreement. Such Compensation Schedule is included in Exhibit F.

5. Section 5 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

5.1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Professional shall provide City the Services described in Exhibits A through F. Any request for Services not included in Exhibits A through F will be considered a request for additional or modified Services (“Modification” or “Modifications”).

Professional shall not receive additional compensation for any Modification of the Services unless the Parties agree otherwise in a writing executed by both Parties.

5.2. City Requested Modification of Services. City may, by written order, authorize Modifications to the Services described in Exhibits A through F. If such Modifications cause an increase in the cost or time required for performance of Professional’s Services, the Parties shall enter into a written amendment to this Agreement to adjust the Services and the compensation to be paid to Professional and, if necessary, amend the Completion Schedule or Compensation Schedule. The Services, Completion Schedule, or Compensation Schedule shall not be revised unless City and Professional mutually agree to a written amendment to this Agreement reflecting such revisions, additional compensation, time for performance or such other terms or conditions mutually agreed upon by the Parties.

6. Section 6 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

6.1. Amount, Time and Manner of Payment for Professional Services. City shall pay Professional according to the rates and timing set forth in the Compensation Schedule for each Task Order within each Amendment to the Agreement. Each Compensation Schedule shall include an exhibit based on Exhibit 10-H1 of Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Professional will be allowed to include an amount for the anticipated salary increases as calculated per Exhibit 10-H1. City’s total compensation to Professional shall not exceed the cumulative amount resulting from each Task Order with each approved Amendment to the Agreement. The

Page 945 of 1016 ends

Page 3 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-111, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 5 compensation for Amendment No. 5 shall not exceed Eight-Hundred-Seventy-Five Thousand One-Hundred-Seventeen Dollars and Twenty-One Cents ($875,117.21) for City Project No. 26-018 (“Maximum Payment”), unless the Parties mutually agree in writing otherwise.

7. Execution and Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously, and in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Parties agree that this Amendment and any other documents to be delivered in connection herewith may be electronically signed utilizing services such as DocuSign and Nitro Sign, or by transmitting signatures in pdf or similar format, and that any electronic signatures appearing on this Agreement or such other documents are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility

8. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the Term of the Agreement.
[Signatures on Following Page]

Page 946 of 1016 ends

Page 4 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-111, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment No. 5 to be executed by and through their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

PROFESSIONAL
Siegfried Engineering, Inc., a California
corporation
By:

Adam Merrill, Vice President
Date
CITY
City of Turlock, a California
municipal corporation
By:

Gary R. Hampton, Interim City Manager
Date:

APPROVED AS TO SUFFICIENCY:

By:

Christopher Fisher,
Municipal Services Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

George A. Petrulakis, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By:

Nichole Fiez, City Clerk
02/27/2026

Page 947 of 1016 ends

F:\22projects\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP\TO#4\Working Documents\Contracts and Proposals\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP_Scope and Fee Task 5_Ver 1.docx
PAGE - 1 -
February 23, 2026
Fred Pezeshk, P.E.

Roads Program Manager
City of Turlock, Municipal Services Department
156 S. Broadway, Ste. 150
Turlock, CA 95380
RE: City of Turlock Roads Program CIP Task #5

TURLOCK, CALIFORNIA

PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
Dear Fred,
We appreciate the opportunity to propose our services to you for this project. Our scope of work, based on previous coordination and emails on the project, is as follows.

I. Project Description
Siegfried will assist City of Turlock with the plans, specifications and cost estimate for the City of Turlock Roads Program CIP (total 15,857 LF) for selected streets identified in the attached exhibits and shown in the table. Total estimated construction cost for the bid package is projected to be $10M-$12M, assuming a majority of the streets need more extensive pavement rehabilitation based on observed conditions.

We plan to assist the City of Turlock with the pavement rehabilitation options and how these deficiencies will be improved, which will be included with the project.

Scope of Work
Siegfried Engineering, Inc. (Siegfried) will provide civil engineering, geotechnical engineering and surveying services to City of Turlock (Client) for the City Road Program CIP (Project) in Turlock, California including the following services:

TASK 1 – MEETINGS & COORDINATION

1. Attending meeting(s) with the City PM to coordinate the project related items.

2. Field visits to verify improvements and coordination with the City PM after the initial 30% submittal.

3. Regular meetings to check in on status and update the City PM.

4. Milestone or submittal meetings to review comments and any revisions.

5. Updating the schedule and keeping the City PM updated on progress.

6. Reviewing all City department’s comments and coordinating.

7. Billing reports

8. Coordination with project team.

TASK 2A – TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY & RESEARCH

1. The topographic survey of the approximate limits shown in attached Exhibits. The survey will be in sufficient detail for use by Siegfried in design and plan development.

2. The following features will be located and mapped:
a. Flow line and lip of gutter lines.
b. Top of curb.

Page 948 of 1016 ends

F:\22projects\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP\TO#4\Working Documents\Contracts and Proposals\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP_Scope and Fee Task 5_Ver 1.docx
PAGE - 2 -
c. Crown of roadway.
d. Edge of pavement.
e. Edge of concrete.
f. Striping.
g. Signage.
h. Curb ramps, where determined those improvements are necessary. i. Sidewalks and driveway, where determined those improvements are necessary. j. Shots will generally be at 50’ station spacing along the roadways, and at grade breaks, beginning, middle and ends of horizontal curves, including side street curb returns. (Essentially a cross section of the impacted area) k. Manholes and Clean outs
l. Utility boxes/vaults/etc.
m. Fences.
n. Walls.
o. Gates.
p. Trees.
q. Dips for sewer and storm where drainage improvements as necessary.

3. Client to provide as-builts, if available.

4. Office preparation and mapping of the surveyed features utilizing AutoCAD Civil 3D.

5. Review General Plan, ATP, and SRTS requirements for each street.

6. Mapping will be based on the California Coordinate System, NAD83, NAVD88 datum.

7. Underground utility lines will be mapped as a part of this scope of work, record information and surface utility shots will be used to map the utilities to the best of our ability.

8. Utility research, notifications and letters to affected utility companies and agencies. Coordinating with various utility companies on their existing facilities and if adjustments are necessary.

9. Review assessment district documents and prepare exhibit showing location and area of each assessment district for use in determining district responsibilities.

TASK 2B – POTHOLING, 30 LOCATIONS ASSUMED
Potholing will be provided by Siegfried. Locations are to be identified during design by Siegfried and City staff. Siegfried shall assume 30 Potholes are needed. Siegfried will compile potholing information into a pothole location map and table format document, which includes the following information: Pothole #, Utility Information, Cover/Depth to top and bottom, horizontal distance to new utility (if applicable), Outside Diameter, Material Type, Asphalt Concrete Thickness, Aggregate Base Thickness. In addition to data listed above, ground locations of each pothole shall be provided (to be shot by GPS or similar method) in PNEZD format within a Microsoft Word compatible “.txt” document. This information will be furnished upon completion of potholing.

TASK 3 – PAVEMENT TESTING & DESIGN
Task 3.1 – Field Exploration
We assume no encroachment permits will be required for this City project. Prior to initiating our field explorations, we will mark the work area with white paint and contact Underground Service Alert (USA) for utility clearance. We have not included fee allowance for hiring an underground utility locator service. We will not take responsibility for damage to underground utilities that are not accurately located within our exploratory locations.

Pavement Core Borings
Following the utility clearance, we will advance one core boring at a frequency of approximately 1 boring up to 800 (±) lineal feet, or 1 per street segment. We anticipate a maximum of 24 core locations with at least one location placed on any given street segment. The cores will be extracted over a period of 3-day shifts. One additional day (up to 10 cores) will be held in reserve for possible future cores if needed to delineate lateral extents of buried features (i.e., buried concrete slabs). At

Page 949 of 1016 ends

F:\22projects\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP\TO#4\Working Documents\Contracts and Proposals\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP_Scope and Fee Task 5_Ver 1.docx
PAGE - 3 -
selected locations, cores may be taken across the street to establish a generalized cross section where there was evidence of historical overlays performed. The cores will be advanced with a manual core drill equipped with 4- or 6-inch diameter core barrels. At select locations, a dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) will be advanced.

During our exploration, a representative from this firm will oversee the testing and collect samples. A continuous log will be maintained asphalt concrete, base, and underlying subgrade description. Bulk samples collected will be sealed to prevent moisture loss and transported to the laboratory for testing and analysis. The depth to initial groundwater will be measured and recorded during the drilling, if encountered. A visual survey of the existing pavement sections will be prepared that includes the type and severity of the pavement distress observed. This provides a tool for selecting the appropriate pavement treatment strategy.

We intend to locate the core borings by pacing from known features which is normally of sufficient accuracy for such work.

We have not included in our scope a budget for an accurate survey of the core locations. If accurate locations are required, then additional budget would be needed. The actual number of core borings may be revised in the field based on the conditions encountered in the various locations, or as requested by the Client or the reviewing agency. Locations will be presented to you prior to work being performed. Given that the cores will be located within the paved roadways, we will provide traffic control devices per the California Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

We assume that the drill cuttings will be backfilled in the hole and the surface topped with cold patch asphalt. We anticipate completing up to 6 locations per day given the mobilization between core locations, setting up traffic control, and a work time allocated from 9 am to 3 pm.

Subconsultants
• Driller: We will utilize our own equipment to core locations. • Traffic Control: City Rise will provide traffic control services.

Task 3.2 – Laboratory Testing
We will perform soils laboratory testing to evaluate the geotechnical characteristics of the samples obtained. Index testing consisting of moisture content, dry density, Atterberg Limits, and particle size analysis will be performed for the in-situ soils.

Resistance “R” Value tests will be performed for pavement design. Corrosivity tests may be performed to determine the site corrosivity. The frequency of tests performed will depend on the conditions encountered.

Subconsultants
• Lab Testing Support: Construction Testing Services
Task 3.3 – Final Report Preparation
The results of the field exploration, laboratory tests and engineering analysis will be presented in a design level report prepared in accordance with the direction of a California Registered Geotechnical Engineer that will include the following:
• Summarize results of field exploration
• Summarize results of laboratory testing
• Conclusions and comments on applicable and proposed pavement reconstruction or rehabilitation methods for each segment
• Presentation of the soil laboratory tests
• Graphics including a scaled site plan, boring location map, and coring/boring logs, etc. • Appendices containing results of our field exploration and laboratory testing.

Schedule
We could begin field work (i.e., permit procurement, USA, and driller coordination) upon notice to proceed. We note the permit procurement and developing the traffic control plan could push the schedule upwards of 2 to 3 weeks from notice to

Page 950 of 1016 ends

F:\22projects\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP\TO#4\Working Documents\Contracts and Proposals\22157 City of Turlock Road CIP_Scope and Fee Task 5_Ver 1.docx
PAGE - 4 -
proceed. Laboratory testing should be completed at least 4 weeks following the completion of our fieldwork. We will submit an electronic copy of the geotechnical report in PDF format within 12 weeks of completion of the laboratory testing. If a quicker turnaround time is needed, please inform the undersigned.

Assumptions to Task
The scope of services presented above for task 3 was developed based on our knowledge of the project requirements and the following assumptions: