City of Twentynine Palms
Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended June 30, 2022
- 8 -
Note 1: Summary of significant accounting policies applicable to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
(a) Scope of presentation
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) presents only the expenditures incurred by the City of Twentynine Palms, California (City) that are reimbursable under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position/fund balance, or cash flows of the City. For the purposes of the SEFA, federal awards include both federal financial assistance received directly from a federal agency, as well as federal funds received indirectly by the City from a non-federal agency or other organization. Only the portion of program expenditures reimbursable with such federal funds are reported in the accompanying SEFA. Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with state, local or other non-federal funds are excluded from the accompanying SEFA.
(b) Basis of accounting
The expenditures included in the accompanying SEFA were reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, expenditures are incurred when the City becomes obligated for payment as a result of the receipt of the related goods and services. Expenditures reported included any property or equipment acquisitions incurred under the federal program. Negative amounts, if presented on the SEFA, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
(c) De minimis indirect cost rate
The City has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance where allowable.
City of Twentynine Palms
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year Ended June 30, 2022
- 9 -
Section I: Summary of Auditor's Results
Financial Statements
Internal control over financial reporting:
Material weakness identified? Yes X No
Significant deficiencies identified? Yes X None Reported Noncompliance material to financial
statements noted? Yes X No
Federal Awards
Internal control over major programs:
Material weakness identified? Yes X No
Significant deficiencies identified Yes X None Reported Any audit findings disclosed that
are required to be reported in
accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a)? Yes X No
Identification of major programs:
Assistance Listing Number
21.027
Dollar threshold used to distinguish
between type A and type B programs: $750,000
Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee? X Yes No
Type of report the auditor issued on whether the financial statements audited were prepared in accordance with GAAP: unmodified
Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs: unmodified Name of Federal Program
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
City of Twentynine Palms
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year Ended June 30, 2022
- 10 -
Section II: Financial Statement Findings
No findings to be reported.
Section III: Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs No findings to be reported.
City of Twentynine Palms
Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings
Year Ended June 30, 2022
- 11 -
No findings were reported in the prior year.
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Recreation Division Manager
FOR MEETING: Dec 13 2022
SUBJECT: Submission of CDBG Grant Application for Fiscal Year 2023/2024.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council approve the submission of the Community Development Block Grant funding application for Fiscal Year 2023/2024.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE:
Request Staff Report (Recreation Division Manager
Presenting)
Council Questions of Staff
Council Discussion
Motion/Second
Discussion of Motion
Call the Question
ATTACHMENTS:
• CDBG 20232024 Application
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the County of San Bernardino requests applications for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) within the City of Twentynine Palms. Various community and governmental organizations throughout the city submit applications.
All applications are sent to the Community Development and Housing Agency (CDH) to be reviewed for validity and meeting the application guidelines. Once reviewed, all projects that are deemed eligible by CDH are sent back to the city for funding prioritization. Typically, the City Council will conduct a presentation workshop in mid to late January for the non-profit organizations who submitted funding applications.
It is anticipated that the City will receive the project eligibility list early January of 2023. It is not yet known how much funding the City will be eligible to receive. The City may fund up to four projects and are not required to meet the $10,000 public service minimum or the $75,000 construction project minimum requirements.
Once the City Council prioritizes the CDBG funding projects in early February, the list is sent to the County Board of Supervisors for their approval in late-April. Funds will become available in July of 2023. The resurfacing of the basketball courts in Luckie Park project is requesting $150,000 in CDBG funds.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
Not applicable
ALTERNATIVES: Page 135 of 854
The City Council may choose not to approve the submission of the project application, resulting in the County not awarding CDBG funds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
San Bernardino County
Fiscal Year -
PublicServices ProgramApplication
The following documents must be submitted in the order listed, please be sure to submit all attachments with your application.
Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Exhibit 5: Performance & Outcomes
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
Exhibit 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Exhibit 8: Signature and Assurances
Application Checklist
_______________
Log Number
(Office Use Only)
1 2024 2023 2024 2023
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 1: Organization Information
Organization Name:
Organization Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Applicant Type:
Authorized Person Name:
Authorized Person’s Title:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Application Contact Person’s Name:
Application Contact Person’s Title:
Explain the Agency’s 1) Mission, 2) Purpose, 3) Population Served, 4) Number of years serving population, 5) Supportive Services, their Funding Sources, and Start/End Dates. 2 760-367-5679 760-367-7562 X1027 Kary Minatrea 2024 Recreation Division Manager The City of Twentynine Palms seeks to create and promote the economic and social well being of it's residents while maintaing our relaxed atmosphere and air quality, as well as simultaneously creating a stronger and more diversified economy through attracting arts and tourism, development, health/retirement, recreational and clean non-polluting industries. The city population is approximately 28,000 residents. Luckie Park has been in existence for 57 years. Luckie Park is considered the main park of the city, where most recreational and community events are held. It's amenities are; two baseball and softball fields, skate park, public restrooms, outdoor picnic shelters, public swimming pool, full size soccer field, three basketball courts, racquetball court, and community hall. The operation and maintenance of the park is funded through the city general fund. Projected start date September 2023, project end date March 2023.
6136 Adobe Road Kary Minatrea [email protected] Kary MinatreaTwentynine Palms / CA / 92277 760-367-5679 Recreation Division Manager 2023 Construction 760-367-7562 X1027 Twentynine Palms / CA / 92277 6136 Adobe Road [email protected]
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 2: Project Information
Project Title:
Project Address:
County Supervisorial District where project will be located:
1 st District 2nd District 3
rd District 4th District 5th District
If you are requesting funds for an existing CDBG project, provide prior CDBG project number.
Will this project provide an opportunity to hire minority-owned and women owned businesses? If YES, describe what actions will be completed to implement such subcontracting plans to monitor this component of the proposed project. If NO, discuss why and what actions are being taken to encourage minority-women businesses to apply for this project. 3 If this is an Expansion of Service to previously funded CDBG project, please explain how this is an expansion of service?. (i.e For 2015 we proposed 60 units of service, this year the agency is planning to serve 100 units of service)
Is this a New Public Service Project, or request to expand services to an existing CDBG project? Basketball Court Resurfacing Project Luckie Park 2024 X 74362 Joe Davis Drive Twentynine Palms, CA 92277
The bidding process will include the encouragement and preference of minority owned businesses to apply. Contacting minority owned businesses directly with requests to submit bids for the project. Certifications from contractors/subcontractors that are owned, operated and controlled by a member(s) of a presumed minority group will be requested. MBE certification, or proof of at least 51% of minority membership will be also requested.
Yes 2023
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 2A: Countywide Vision
Indicate Yes/No in the table below if any of these countywide vision goals are pertinent to the proposed project.
Countywide Vision
Countywide Vision Yes/ No
Implement the Countywide Vision.
Create, Maintain and Grow Jobs and
Economic Value in the County.
Improve County Government Operations.
Operate in a Fiscally-Responsible and
Business-Like Manner.
Ensure Development of a Well-Planned,
Balanced, and Sustainable County.
Maintain Public Safety.
Provide for the Health and Social Services
Needs of County Residents.
Pursue County Goals and Objectives by
Working with Other Governmental
Agencies.
Provide a brief narrative of how your project meets the Countywide Vision:
4 Yes Yes 2024
The city envisions a sustainable system of high quality education, recreation, community health, public safety, housing, retail arts and culture and infrastructure. The development of sustainable systems complements our natural resources and environment. The project at this park will benefit the community and focuses directly on providing safe, accessible and equitable facilities.
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2023 Yes
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population
Community Needs Target Population
Public Service
Needs:
Yes/No Proposed Community: Yes/No
Senior Services Low and Moderate Persons
Handicapped
Services
Low and Moderate
Households
Youth Services Abused Children
Child Care
Services
Handicapped Persons
Transportation
Services
Illiterate Persons
Substance Abuse
Services
Homeless Persons
Employment
Training
Migrant Farm Workers
Health Services Elderly People
Lead Hazard
Screening
Crime
Awareness
5 City/Target Area of Project Beneficiaries
Participating Cities: (i.e Redlands, Colton, Yucaipa)
Yes Yes Yes Yes 2024 No Yes Yes Yes NoYes Yes Yes Yes 2023 NoNo Yes No The project would benefit the residents of the City of Twentynine Palms and residents of surrounding unincorporated areas including the Marine Corps base.
No
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 3: Community Needs and Target Population (continued) Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposed program reside (attach a map if needed):
HUD Demographics: (Yes/No)
Does this project help prevent homelessness?
Does this project help the homeless?
Does this project help those with HIV or AIDS?
Does this project primarily help persons with disabilities? Summarize the description of your project to include 1) priority, 2) sub-activity, 3) population(s) to be served, and 4) accomplishment level, and 5) services to be provided. 6 No 2024
The park and it's facilities are shared with the Morongo Unified School District and other groups, as they do not have access to sports fields. The recreation department offers a youth basketball league each year with over 400 children participating. Court practice space is at a premium during the league season. Basketball is by far the most popular sport and the courts are used daily by the general public, and recreational leagues. The outdoor courts within the park are in need of resurfacing and repair due to wear and tear, exposure to the elements and tree roots cracking the foundations. The courts have not been resurfaced since 2007 and are in dire need due to potential safety concerns. The ideal project timeline is for completion within 3 to 9 months.
No No
Residents reside within city limits as well as the surrounding unincorporated areas including Desert Heights, Flamingo Heights, and Wonder Valley. Twentynine Palms is considered a urban/rural area.The city itself is comprised of 59.1 square miles.
No 2023
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Describe how this project meets the priority population and activities selected.
Explain why this project is needed and what evidence can you substantiate the need.
Describe what gaps of service in the county this project fills.
What are the critical factors for the success of your project (include both financial and human resources)? For instance, is this the only funding for this project? What happens if funding decreases? Does this project rely on only one source of leveraging? Is there adequate staff involved with the project if there is project turnover? Please address any factor that is critical to project success.
7 The City of Twentynine Palms has an estimated population of 28,000 residents. The park is a public space that is available to all members of the community and unincorporated areas of the Morongo Basin. The area in which the project is located is within a low and moderate income neighborhood.
2024
The outdoor courts within the park are in need of resurfacing and repair due to wear and tear, exposure to the elements and tree roots cracking the foundations. The courts have not been resurfaced since 2007 and are in dire need due to potential safety concerns. Programs and services that the recreation offers are growing. Popularity, exposure to the elements, and overuse have caused the amenities to wear out at a rapid pace.
Providing a safe, and inclusive environment for residents of all ages and abilities to recreate without having to pay a fee for participation. Many of the park patrons who use the court facilities are those who are deemed ineligible to play organized sports due to age, academics, or socioeconomic factors.
2023
The ability to resurface the courts with CDBG funding will allow for the resurfacing of the three outdoor basketball courts within the park. In the event that funding is not attainable through CDBG, city reserves will need to be set aside and each court will need to be accessed for safety and prioritized for resurfacing. Staff involved with the project have experience and knowledge of CDBG funding processes.
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4: Project Budget & Sources
Project Budget
SB County Share: ($) Other Source: ($)
Personnel
Equipment (Rental, Lease or Purchase)
Consultant Services
(Auditing, Accounting or Payroll)
Space Rent
Insurance
Consumable Supplies
Other
Total Costs
Total Project Budget Cost: (CDBG Share + Other Source)
8 Construction 2024 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $0.00 2023 $150,000.00
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 4A: CDBG Funds Requested and Leveraging Information Indicate the amount being requested by the city.
City Amount Requested ($):
(This amount should match the grand
total requested from CDBG Share)
9 Leveraging items may include any written commitments that will be used towards your cash match requirements in the project, as well as any written commitments for building, equipment, materials, services and volunteer time.
Source of
Funding:
Type of Funding: (Grant Name,
EFSP Money)
Amount ($): Date
Available:
(11/22/2016)
Federal
Funding
State
Funding
County
Funding
Private
Funding
Other:
Total Leveraging Funds
$15,000.00 07/01/2023 2024 City General Funds $150,000.00 $15,000.00 Twentyni 2023
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5: Performance and Outcomes
Definitions:
Unduplicated Clients: The number clients/persons projected to be served during the program year (e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors):
Duplicated Clients: The estimated yearly units of service (duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service):
Complete the chart below with the number of Duplicated and Unduplicated Clients to be served.
• In column 1 identify activities that will be completed (e.g. intervention, counseling, and case management).
• In column 2 indicate the number of Unduplicated Clients to be served. • In column 3 identify the number of Duplicated Clients to be served.
Activities to be Completed (1) Unduplicated
Clients to be
Served (2)
Duplicated Clients
projected to be
served (3)
Performance and Outcomes, answer the following narrative questions using minimum funds request.
Indicate a timeline of services provided to client(s) in order to meet project outcome(s).
Describe how your agency determines client(s) success.
Describe your methodology to evaluate project outcomes. 10 2024
A timeline for completion of the project will be included in the scope of work for the project bid. 2023
The basketball courts will be completed in phases as to not interrupt services. After one section is complete, the next set of courts will be scheduled for completion. Page 146 of 854 Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 5A: Proposed Goals & Milestones
Explain how the project will meet contract goals and milestones and be completed within 12 months (July 1, – June 30, ). For example, project expenditures and performance/ accomplishment goals of 40% by November 30th, 50% by December 31st, 80% by March 31st, and 100% by June 30th.
Fill-in the table below with dates for submission of reimbursement claims and the estimated amount of each.
Date of Reimbursement: Amount ($):
Total Reimbursement:
($)
11 03/31/2023 2024 2024 $150,000.00
Project completion is expected to be 50 percent complete by November 1st and 100% complete by February 1st.
$150,000.00 2023 2023
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
Exhibit 6: Agency Capacity Narrative
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Describe the roles of key administrators, staff members, and volunteers within your agency that will implement the proposed project. In your description include experience, education, and licensing qualifications.
Describe your agency’s experience in administering government and/or public funds.
Describe your method to sustain project viability over the multi-year process if funding decreases.
Instructions: Complete the table below by marking “YES” or “NO” to the questions listed below.
Question:
Example: Have you received federal funds in the past
five years? Yes
In the past ten years, has your organization ever had its nonprofit status revoked or withheld by the IRS, the
Secretary of State, the State Attorney General, or the
Franchise Tax Board?
Has your organization been sued in the last five years? Are any of your managers or staff with fiscal
responsibilities involved in litigation presently that has any bearing on fiduciary trust or employee relations?
Have any unfavorable rulings been handed down by any
court against your organization or Executive Director the last five years?
Does your organization currently have any unresolved
fiscal, reporting, or program issues with any of its funding sources?
YES/ NO
12 No 2024 No
All staff within the city have experience with the successful completion of CDBG, state and federal administration of public funds.
No
During annual strategic planning sessions, the project will have a place marker on the list of priority projects for funding consideration.
No 2023 Yes
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
EXHIBIT 7: Civil Rights Laws Compliance and HUD Good Standing Answer the following questions.
Has your organization been a past recipient of assistance under a HUD McKinney Act program or the HUD Single Family Property Disposition Homeless Program? If you have been a recipient under either of these programs, has your agency experienced any project or construction delay, HUD finding or outstanding audit that HUD deems serious regarding the administration of HUD McKinney Act programs or the HUD Single Family Property Disposition Homeless Program?
If you answered “Yes”, please explain the circumstances and outcome below.
Applicants must be in compliance with applicable civil rights laws and Executive Orders. Applications will be rejected if your agency has any of the following: (1) Any pending civil rights lawsuit instituted by the U.S. Department of Justice; (2) Any noncompliance with civil rights statutes, Executive Orders or regulations as a result of formal administrative proceedings, unless the applicant is operating under a HUD-approved compliance agreement designed to correct the area of noncompliance or is currently negotiating such an agreement; (3) Any unresolved Secretarial charge of discrimination issues under Section 810(g) of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented by 24 CFR 103:400; (4) Any adjudication of a civil rights violation in a civil action brought against the Organization by a private individual, unless the applicant is operating in compliance with a court order designed to correct the area of noncompliance or the applicant has discharged any responsibility arising from such litigation; (5) Any deferral of the processing of applications from the sponsor imposed by HUD under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Attorney General’s Guidelines (28 CFR 50.3) or the HUD Title VI regulations (24 CFR 1.8) and procedures, or under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and HUD Section 504 regulations (24 CFR 8.57). If one or more of these situations exists with your Organization, please attach a brief description.
13 2024 No 2023 No
E-Signature Authorization
San Bernardino County
Community Development and Housing Departmemt
Community Development Block Grant
Martha Zepeda
Deputy Executive Officer
- Application
In order to comply with all applicable federal grant regulations, a hard-copy of this E-Signature Authorization containing an original wet signature must be filed with the San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing (CDH) in order for the applicant to electronically sign the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application documents online. This authorization may only be completed by a registered owner, partner, executive officer, or authorized employee (with proof of authorization) of the applicant submitting this form and must contain an original signature to be submitted to the CDH.
Authorization Agreement
I am an owner, partner, executive officer, or duly authorized employee of the below-listed applicant and have authority to enter into agreements on behalf of the below-listed applicant. CDH may rely on the receipt of such agreements executed and delivered by facsimile or other electronic means as if the original had been received. The undersigned agrees that the electronic signatures appearing on documents submitted from the below-listed applicant are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability and admissibility. By signing this Electronic Signature Authorization Agreement, I authorize the CDH to accept, via electronic submission, documents submitted from the below-listed applicant as required by the CDH's CDBG - Funding Application.
I understand that CDH may change the CDBG application system from time to time. I agree that the below-listed applicant will electronically sign all documents requiring a signature related to the CDBG funding application.
My signature on this form certifies that:
I agree that entering my name in the CDBG funding application system constitutes my electronic signature. I understand that any information and documents submitted using my name is electronically certifying my signature. I understand that I am legally bound, obligated, and responsible by use of my electronic signature as much as I would be by my handwritten signature. I agree that I will protect my signature from unauthorized use, and that I will contact CDH immediately, upon discovery that my electronic signature has been compromised. I certify that my electronic signature is for my own use, and that I will not delegate it or share it with any individual.
This request is effective immediately upon receipt by the CDH and will remain in effect until the end of the - CDBG funding cycle or I choose to cancel this request via written notification to the CDH. I understand that it is my responsibility to update and/or cancel this request under all circumstances, including my departure or terminated association with the below-listed applicant.
By signing the E- Signature Authorization Form we certify that this agency will also comply with the following:
Non-discrimination
This organization will, through all possible means, ensure equal opportunity for all persons to receive services, to participate in the volunteer structure, and to be employed regardless of age, handicap, national background, race, religion, or sex. An existing sectarian nature of the agency shall not suffer impairment under this agreement, but participation in religious observances, rituals or services will not be required as a condition of receiving food, services, or shelter paid for by this grant.
Accountability
We commit this organization, if a grant is received, to provide all reports to the County as required; to expend monies only on eligible costs; to keep complete documentation (copies of all canceled checks, invoices, receipts, etc.) on all expenditures for a minimum of three years; to spend all funds and close out the program on the required date; to return any unused funds to the County to cooperate with monitoring or site visits, and; to provide complete documentation of expenses to the County, if requested, by the required date.
We affirm that all information in this application is true and correct to the best of our knowledge and that the applicant under our authority will execute its responsibility under the proposed contract and adhere to all other applicable rules and regulations to the fullest extent possible.
Non-collusion
This proposal is genuine, and not sham or collusive, nor made in the interest or in behalf of any person not herein named; the proposer has not directly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a sham proposal, or any other person, firm or corporation to refrain from submitting a proposal; the proposer has not in any manner sought by collusion to secure for him/herself an advantage over any other proposer.
Applicant Information
Agency Name: Federal Tax ID No.:
Mailing Address: Phone No.:
Email Address: Fax No:
Authorized Signature
Print Name: Print Title:
Signature: Date:
Please send the signed copy of this one page agreement to:
San Bernardino County Community Development and Housing Department 215 North D Street, Suite 302, San Bernardino, CA 94215-0043 Attn: CDBG Application
14 Recreation Division Manager Recreation Division Manager [email protected] 2024 2024 2024 (760) 367-5679 (760) 367-5679 City of Twentynine Palms 6136 Adobe Road Twentynine Palms, CA 92277 Kary Minatrea 2023 2023 2023 (760) 367-7562 (760) 367-7562 33-0265469
Public Services Program Application Fiscal Year –
CDBG Application Checklist
(Non-Profit Organizations Only)
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting these items at this time, please notify Community Development and Housing at (909) 387-4705 to make other arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
o Summary of agency’s current year General Operating Budget o List of agency’s Board of Directors, including names and addresses o Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State Franchise Tax Board) o Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
o Organizational chart
o Minutes of last Board meeting
o Non- Profit agencies must be Registered in the System of Award Management (SAM) website.
Agency cannot be funded if they have been debarred in the past. o Provide board minutes/letter that authorizes the executive director or program manager to run the project.
If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of your last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws must be on file. 15 2023 2024
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Engineer
FOR MEETING: Dec 13 2022
SUBJECT: Second Reading of Building Code Update.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council adopt Ordinance No. 301 of City of Twentynine Palms amending Title 18 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code adopting the:
Part 1 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, compromising the 2022 California Administrative Code of Regulations, compromising the 2022 California Building Code Volumes 1 & 2, with appendices and Chapter 1 Division II;
Part 2.5 of the Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, compromising the 2022 California Residential Code with appendices;
Part 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, comprising the 2022 California Electrical Code; Part 4 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, comprising the 2022 California Mechanical Code;
Part 5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations comprising the 2022 California Plumbing Code, with appendix H;
Part 6 of the Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, comprising the 2022 California Energy Code; Part 8 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, comprising the 2022 Historic Building Code; Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code Regulations, comprising the 2022 California Fire Code with Chapter 4 appendices;
Part 10 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, comprising the 2022 California existing Building Code;
Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, comprising the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code;
Part 12 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, comprising the 2022 California Referenced Standards Code; the 2020 Edition of the International Property Maintenance Code and Appendix H; the 2020 Edition of the Uniform Code for Solar Energy Installations, with appendices thereto, including amendments, additions and deletions; and amending the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE:
Request Staff Report (Chief Building Official
Presenting)
Council Questions of Staff
Request Public Comment
Council Discussion
Motion/Second
Call the Question
ATTACHMENTS:
• Building Code Ordinance
BACKGROUND:
This Building Code update reflects the tri-annual update of the State Building Codes, dictated by the State of California.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, AND AMENDING PART 1 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; PART 2 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE VOLUMES 1 AND 2, WITH APPENDICES, F G, H, I, J N AND CHAPTER 1 DIVISION II; PART 2.5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, WITH APPENDICES; PART 3 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; PART 4 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; PART 5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, WITH APPENDIX H; PART 6 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; PART 8 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORIC BUILDING CODE; PART 9 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE WITH APPENDIX CHAPTER 4, APPENDICES B, BB, C, CC, D ,E ,F ,G ,H, I, N AND O ; PART 10 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; PART 11 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; PART 12 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; THE 2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AND APPENDIX H; THE 2021 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR SOLAR ENERGY INSTALLATIONS, WITH APPENDICES THERETO, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS; AND AMENDING THE TWENTYNINE PALMS MUNICIPAL CODE.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
Exempt from CEQA per Section 15061(b) (3).
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council could modify the City's Building Code to be more stringent than the State's requirements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS
CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 301
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, AND AMENDING PART 1 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2019 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; PART 2 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE VOLUMES 1 AND 2, WITH APPENDICES, F G, H, I, J N AND CHAPTER 1 DIVISION II; PART 2.5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, WITH APPENDICES; PART 3 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; PART 4 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; PART 5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, WITH APPENDIX H; PART 6 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; PART 8 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORIC BUILDING CODE; PART 9 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE WITH APPENDIX CHAPTER 4, APPENDICES B, BB, C, CC, D ,E ,F ,G ,H, I, N AND O ; PART 10 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; PART 11 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; PART 12 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; THE 2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AND APPENDIX H; THE 2021 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM CODE FOR SOLAR ENERGY INSTALLATIONS, WITH APPENDICES THERETO, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS; AND AMENDING
THE TWENTYNINE PALMS MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, Title 18 of the Municipal Code (the “Code”) of the City of Twentynine Palms (the “City”) has provided minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property and public welfare by regulating the construction, quality of materials, use, and occupancy, location and maintenance of all buildings and structures within this jurisdiction and certain equipment; and
WHEREAS, Title 18 - Building and Construction has not been comprehensively updated since January 1, 2019; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City to update and amend a portion of Title 18 of the Code to incorporate the newly adopted standards adopted by the State of California Building Standards Commission and to account for the new building construction standards; and
WHEREAS, the 2022 California Building Standards Code, contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, parts 1-12, incorporate public health, life safety, and general welfare standards used in the design and construction of buildings in California. The California codes incorporate the latest national standards for construction, including the 2021 International Building Code, the 2021 International Residential Code, the International Fire Code, the 2020 National Electrical Code, the 2021 Uniform Plumbing Code, the 2021 Uniform Mechanical Code and the California Green Building Standards Code; and
WHEREAS, the City also desires to make certain amendments to the above State codes based on local climatic, geologic and topographic conditions as outlined in the resolution accompanying this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section §50022.1, et seq., provides that ordinances and codes of the Federal, State, or any agency of either of them, may be adopted by reference, provided that prior to such adoption by reference a notice public hearing has been held.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 18.01 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, “Findings”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) Government Code sections 50022.1 et. Seq., provide that ordinances and codes of the federal, state or any agency of either of them may be adopted by reference, provided that prior to such adoption by reference a noticed public hearing has been held.
(b) Pursuant to Section 17958.5 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, The City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms hereby finds that the amendments of the building standards contained in the California Building Code, Volumes 1, 2, 2019 Edition are necessary do to:
(1) Local Climatic Conditions.
(A) The City is subject to extremely strong winds, commonly known as “Santa Ana Winds” which can reach speeds in excess of 90 miles per hour. Extensive damage frequently accompanies these winds, such as blowing sand and debris, downed power lines, fallen trees, overturned vehicles and structural damage to buildings. These conditions result in increased demand for fire services, blocked or delayed emergency vehicle access and impaired water supplies and building emergency systems.
(B) During the summer months, the Santa Ana Winds may produce periods of extremely low humidity, thereby reducing the fuels moisture and increasing the possibility and severity of fire from dry vegetation and other common combustibles.
(C) During the summer months, much of the City experiences prolonged periods of temperatures in excess of 100°F. When coupled with sustained severe Santa Ana Winds, an increase in the threat from rapidly moving wildfires exists.
(D) During the winter months, heavy rains routinely cause damage to roadways rendering them completely impassible, or with limited access, sometimes for extended periods.
(E) During winter months, heavy snow and ice conditions exist in the mountain areas resulting in increased demand for fire services and limiting or delaying emergency vehicle access. In some cases, emergency vehicle access roads are completely impassible, or have limited access, sometimes for extended periods.
(2) Local Geological Conditions.
(A) The City is subject to moderately strong to severe shaking and surface ruptures resulting from known earthquake faults located within or near the City.
These local earthquake faults have the potential to cause severe personal and property damage, utility interruptions, fire hazards and hazardous materials releases. Additionally, significant roadway, bridge structure, water supply and communications systems are subject to failure, thereby causing a detriment to emergency services response.
(B) Unstable slopes in several areas throughout the City have experienced soil movement as a result of heavy or soaking rains, resulting in damage to roadways, structures and utilities.
(C) Some desert areas of the City have limited aquifers, exceptionally deep aquifers or aquifers providing only brackish or contaminated water supplies.
These limits, or in some cases eliminates, water supplies available for firefighting purposes.
(3) Local Topographical Conditions.
(A) The City encompasses an area with limited access routes connecting valley, mountain and desert areas. This distance, combined with these limited access routes, results in delays in the reallocation of resources to emergency scenes. (B) The topography of the City is exceptionally diverse, ranging from relatively flat desert and valley areas, to foothill areas, and canyon areas. This results in some areas that are inaccessible to radio communications, which hampers emergency response capabilities.
(C) The diverse topography of the City results in many areas having limited, unreliable or unavailable water supplies available for firefighting purposes. (c) Copies of these codes and standards were filed with the office of the City Clerk fifteen days prior to the noticed hearing.
(d) A noticed public hearing shall be held by the City Council, at which time all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting by reference the current editions of certain model codes, as follows:
California Building Code, 2022 Edition, Volumes 1, 2 with Appendix F, G, H, I, J, N California Residential Building Code, 2022 Edition with Appendices California Mechanical Code, 2019 Edition with Appendix and Standards California Plumbing Code 2019 Edition with Appendix H
California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition California Green Building Code, 2022 Edition California Energy Code, 2022 Edition California Historic Building Code, 2022 Edition California Fire Code, 2022 Edition
California Administrative Code, 2022 Edition 2021 International Property Maintenance Code
(e) Pursuant to Section 17958.5 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, The City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms hereby finds that the amendments of the building standards contained in the California Building Code, Volumes 1, 2, 2022 Edition are necessary do to past earthquakes (Landers 1992) and the inherent run off problems incurred with severe thunderstorm activity and flooding due to the City’s desert location.” Page 157 of 854
SECTION 2. Section 18.01.020 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, “Building Code Adopted; Amendments”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) Building Code Adopted: Except as hereinafter provided, the California Building Codes, 2022 Edition, Volumes 1, & 2 published by the International Codes Council.
All California Building Code Appendix Chapters with the exception of Appendix Chapters F, G, H, I, J, N; Elevator Safety Code Title 24 part 7 for Elevators and Escalators, Society of Mechanical Engineers; Structural Welding Code-Reinforcing Steel, AWS D1.4- 92 (UBC Standard No.19-2); Structural Welding Code-Steel, ANSI/AWS D1.1-84 (UBC Standard No.27-6) and Structural Welding Code-Sheet Steel, ANSI/AWS D1.3-81 (UBC Standard No. 27-13) published by the American Welding Society; as modified or amended in the California Building Code referenced herein; is hereby adopted by reference as the Building Code of the City of Twentynine Palms for regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment use, height area, maintenance of all buildings or structures in the City of Twentynine Palms providing for the issuance of all permits and collection of fees therefore; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms of such California Building Code, 2022 Edition, Volumes 1, 2, , published by the International Code Council above, except as amended herein, all of which are on file in the office of
the City Clerk, City of Twentynine Palms are hereby referred to, adopted and made part hereof as if fully set out in this ordinance.
A copy of the Building Code of the City of Twentynine Palms shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk in the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this code is in force. (b) Building Code Amended: The 2022 California Building Code as adopted by referenced herein is amended as follows:
(1) The California Building Code, Chapter 1, Division II, Section 104.8, “Liability”, is hereby amended to read as follows:
The Building Official, or his authorized representative charged with the enforcement of this Code and the technical codes, acting in good faith and without malice in the discharge of his duties, shall not thereby render himself personally liable for any damage that may accrue to persons or property as a result of any act or by reason of any act or omission in the discharge of his duties.
Such Codes shall not be construed to relieve from or lessen the responsibility of any person owning, operating or controlling any building, structure or building service equipment therein for any damages to persons or property caused by defects, nor shall the code enforcement agency or its parent jurisdiction be held as assuming any such liability by reason of the inspection authorized by this code or any permits or certificates issued under this code.
(2) California Building Code Chapter 1, Volume 1, Section 109, “Fees”, shall be amended to read as follows:
(A) All fees shall be as set forth in the most recent resolution of the City Council regarding fees for building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, elevator and grading permits and plan review. Page 158 of 854
(3) California Building Code Chapter 15, Volume 1, Section 1505.1, “Roof Covering Requirements”, is hereby amended by addition of the following sentence:
The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code shall be Class “A” as classified in Section 1505.2. Exception: Repairs of and additions to existing structures which requires the replacement or addition of 25% or less of the total roof area may be made using material matching the existing roof. (4) Sections J101.3, “Grading Design”, and J110.1, “Erosion Control”, of California Building Code Appendix J, “Excavation and Grading”, is hereby restated to read as follows:
(5) Grading Designation
Grading in excess of 2500 cubic yards shall be performed in accordance with the approved grading plan prepared by a civil engineer and shall be designated “engineered grading.” Grading involving less than 2500 cubic yards shall be designated “regular grading” unless the City Engineer determines that special conditions or unusual hazards exist, in which case grading shall conform to the requirements for engineered grading.’
(6) Erosion Control
(A) Erosion control shall be indicated on all grading plans and implemented based upon the best management practices in the most recent editions of Erosion and Sediment Control Field Manual, Fourth Edition, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, 2002; Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook – Construction, California Stormwater Quality Association, January 2015; and Construction Site Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual, State of California, Department of Transportation.
(7) California Building Code Chapter 18, Volume 2, is hereby amended by addition of the following Section 1802.1.1.1, “Soils and Foundation” which reads:
The City Engineer may require an engineering geology or geotechnical engineering report, or both, where in his opinion such reports are essential for the evaluation of the safety of the site. The engineering geology or geotechnical engineering report, or both shall contain a finding regarding the safety of the building site for the proposed structure against hazard from landslide, settlement, or slippage and a finding regarding the effect that the proposed building or grading construction will have on the geologic stability of property outside the building site. Any engineering geology report shall be prepared by a certified engineering geologist licensed by the State of California. Any geotechnical engineering report shall be prepared by a civil engineer qualified to perform this work, such as a geotechnical engineer experienced in soils mechanics. When both an engineering geology and geotechnical engineering report are required for the evaluation of the safety of the site, the two reports shall be coordinated before submission to the City Engineer.” SECTION 3. Section 18.01.030 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, “Residential Building Code Adopted”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) Residential Building Code Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, with the acceptation of appendices AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AG, AI, AK, AL, AN, Page 159 of 854 AP, AO, AR, AS, AT, AU, AV, AW & AY the Residential Code, 2022 Edition, published by the International Code Council is hereby adopted by reference as the Residential Building Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Residential Building Code, 2022 Edition, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force.
SECTION 4. Section 18.01.040 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, “Electrical Code Adopted”, is hereby repealed in its entirely and restated as follows:
(a) Electrical Code Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, the California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association is hereby adopted by reference as the Electrical Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force. (b) Electrical Code Amended. The Administrative Provisions governing the California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition, Annex H including violation and penalty provisions shall be as set forth in Section 14 of this Chapter.
SECTION 5. Section 18.01.050 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code “Plumbing Code Adopted”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) Plumbing Code Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, published by the Uniform Plumbing Code, and including the installation standards contained in is hereby adopted by reference as the Plumbing Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Plumbing Code 2022 Edition, including the installation standards shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force. (b) Plumbing Code Amended. The Administrative provisions of the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, contained in part one of that Code except Sections 101.1, 101.2 101.3 and 101.4 are hereby deleted. The Administrative provisions governing the Plumbing Code, including violation and penalty provisions, shall be as set forth in Section 14 of this ordinance.
SECTION 6. Section 18.01.060 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, “California Existing Building Code”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) Existing Building Code Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, the California Existing Building Code, 2022 Edition, published by the International Code Council is hereby adopted by reference as the Existing Building Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Existing Building Code, 2022 Edition, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force.
SECTION 7. Section 18.01.070 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, “California Historical Building Code Adopted”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) Historical Building Code Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, the California Historical Building Code, 2022 Edition, published by the International Code Council is hereby adopted by reference as the Historical Building Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Historical Building Code, 2022 Edition, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms Page 160 of 854 and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force.
SECTION 8. Section 18.01.080 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, “California Reference Standards Code Adopted”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) California Reference Standards Code Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, the California Reference Standards Code, 2022 Edition, published by the International Code Council is hereby adopted by reference as the California Reference Standards Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Reference Standards Code, 2022 Edition, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force.
SECTION 9. Section 18.01.090 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code Mechanical Code Adopted, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) Mechanical Code Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, The California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, and is hereby adopted by reference as the Mechanical Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force.
(b) Mechanical Code Amended. The Administrative provisions of the California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition, contained in Part I except sections 101 and 102 are hereby deleted. The Administrative provisions governing the Mechanical Code, including violation and penalty provisions, shall be as set forth in Section 14 of this Chapter.
SECTION 10. Section 18.01.100 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code “California Green Building Standards Adopted”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) California Green Building Standards Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, the California Green Building Standards, 2022 Edition, published by the California Building Standards Commission is hereby adopted by reference as the Green Building Standards of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Green Building Standards, 2022 Edition, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force.
SECTION 11. Section 18.01.110 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, California Energy Code Adopted, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows:
(a) California Energy Code Adopted by Reference. Except as hereinafter provided, the California Energy Code, 2022 Edition, published by the California Building Standards Commission is hereby adopted by reference as the California Energy Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the California Energy Code, 2022 Edition, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms and shall be made available for public inspection while this Code is in force.
SECTION 12. Section 18.01.120 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, The International Property Maintenance Code, is hereby repealed in its entirety and restated as follows: Page 161 of 854
Except as hereinafter provided the International Property Maintenance Code, 2018 Edition, published by the International Code Council, is hereby adopted by reference as the Housing Code of the City of Twentynine Palms. A copy of the International Property Maintenance Code, 2021 Edition, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection while this Code is in force.
SECTION 13. Section 8.02.130 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, Amendments Necessary, is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION 14. Current Section, 18.01.140 of the Twentynine Palms Municipal Code, Violations and Penalties, is hereby repealed in its entirety and re-numbered as Section
8.02.130, to read as follows:
(a) Violations and penalties pertaining to violations of this Chapter 8.02 shall be as follows:
(1) Unlawful acts. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, alter, extend, repair, move, remove, demolish or occupy any building, structure or equipment regulated by this Chapter, or cause same to be done, in conflict with or in violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter. (2) Notice of violation. The building official is authorized to serve a notice of violation or order on the person responsible for the erection, construction, alteration, extension, repair, moving, removal, demolition or occupancy of a building or structure in violation of the provisions of this Chapter, or in violation of a permit or certificate issued under the provisions of this Chapter. Such order shall direct the discontinuance of the illegal action or condition and the abatement of the violation.
(3) Prosecution of violation. If the notice of violation is not complied with promptly, the building official is authorized to request the City Attorney to institute the appropriate proceeding at law or in equity to restrain, correct or abate such violation, or to require the removal or termination of the unlawful occupancy of the building or structure in violation of the provisions of this code or of the order or direction made pursuant thereto.
(4) Violation penalties. Any person who violates a provision of this code or fails to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who erects, constructs, alters or repairs a building or structure in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the building official, or of a permit or certificate issued under the provisions of this code, shall be subject to penalties as prescribed by law. (b) Other Penalties. In addition to the penalties and procedures stated in this Section, the City may enforce the provisions of this Chapter by any other administrative, criminal or civil remedies available to the City under this Code.
SECTION 15. Severability.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this Ordinance and each and all provisions thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one-off said provisions may be declared invalid. Page 162 of 854
SECTION 16. Processing of Ordinance.
After first reading, this ordinance shall be adopted pursuant to the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 50022.3. To wit, after the first reading of the title of the adopting ordinance and of the title of the code to be adopted hereby the City Clerk is directed to schedule a public hearing thereon. Notice of the hearing shall be published pursuant to Section 6066 in a newspaper of general circulation. The notice shall state the time and place of the hearing. It shall also state that copies of the codes being adopted by reference are on file with the Clerk and are open to public inspection. The notice shall also contain a description which the legislative body deems sufficient to give notice to interested persons of the purpose of the ordinance and the subject matter thereof.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms, California, held on this 13th day of December, 2022. ___________________________________
Karmolette O’Gilvie, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Cindy Villescas CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
A. Patrick Muñoz, City Attorney
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 301, introduced on the 8th day of November, 2022 and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms in a meeting held on the 13th day of December, 2022, in Twentynine Palms, California by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER:
_____________________________
Cindy Villescas CMC, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Engineer
FOR MEETING: Dec 13 2022
SUBJECT: 6536-6538 Desert Queen Ave Demolitions.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council:
1. Award a contract to demolish the structures at 6536-6538 Desert Queen Ave to The Van Dyke Corporation in the amount of $33,000 and authorize a Ten Percent (10%) Contingency in the amount of $3,300, for a total contract amount of $36,300;
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to enter into the contract, including any necessary amendments thereto.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE:
Request Staff Report (City Manager presenting)
Council Questions of Staff
Request Public Comment
Council Discussion
Motion/Second
Call the Question
ATTACHMENTS:
• Van Dyke- Demolition Quote
BACKGROUND:
Basin Transit, formerly known as Morongo Basin Transit Authority, plans to construct a transfer station in the Downtown area of Twentynine Palms. To prepare for the future development, the City-owned vacant properties at 6536-6538 Desert Queen Ave are recommended to be demolished. All utilities, as well as materials containing asbestos, have been safely removed.
On October 31, 2022, several contractors were requested to submit an informal bid to perform the demolition services. By November 9, 2022, the informal bid request yielded the following three bids:
Bidder Bid
The Van Dyke Corporation $33,000
A to Z Grading and Excavation $38,700
IE General Engineering $48,000
Upon review of the bids, it has been determined that The Van Dyke Corporation is the Lowest and Responsive Bidder. The Van Dyke Corporation has extensive experience providing such services to the City in the past. Page 165 of 854
Staff is recommending awarding The Van Dyke Corporation a contract to conduct the demolition services.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
A comprehensive asbestos survey identified positive concentrations of asbestos within the structures. An asbestos abatement company then safely removed and disposed of all asbestos materials.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council could choose not to demolish the building.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The funds will be reimbursed by Basin Transit.
November 7, 2022
To: City of 29 Palms
6136 Adobe Road
29 Palms, CA, 92277
Care of: Charles Abbott Associates
Attn: Kenneth Bailey
We are pleased to submit this proposal for Contract work on the following project:
6536 -6538 Desert Queen Ave, 29 Palms Ca. 92277
● ) Demo and Dispose Existing Structures.
● ) Demo and Dispose Concrete Slab and Footings.
● ) Abandond Existing Septic Systems.
● ) Remove and Dispose to ground level existing trees.
● ) Abandon Existing Fence.
● ) Grade Lot at completion of Demo.
CLIRIFICATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
● All Abatement of Hazardous Materials is by Others.
● All disconnect of Existing Utilities is by Others.
TOTAL PROPOSAL $ 33,000.00
THE VAN DYKE CORPORATION
By:_________________________________
David Van Dyke, President
Demo 2 Units
The scope of work included in this proposal is as follows:
SCOPE LETTER
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
FOR MEETING: Dec 13 2022
SUBJECT: Clean Water State Revolving Funding (SRF) Resolution RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council approve Resolution No. 22-___ and Resolution No. 22-____approving the submission of the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) application for the furtherance of the planning and construction of the centralized wastewater and sewer system for the City and a reimbursement resolution allowing the City to receive the funding for funds spent from this point forward, respectively.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE:
Request Staff Report (City Manager
Presenting)
Council Questions of Staff
Request Public Comment
Council Discussion
Motion/Second
Discussion of Motion
Call the Question
ATTACHMENTS:
• Reimbursement Resolution
• Authorizing Resolution
BACKGROUND:
The Budget Act of 2021 allocated $650M for Septic to Sewer Conversions, and of which, $350M is specifically designed for Disadvantage Communities (DAC). The City of Twentynine Palms is a DAC. The implementation of these funds will be through the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF); the attached resolutions are required for the application process. The first submission will be the general package which is going to be submitted the week of December 13th. The first resolution is to authorize the submission of the project and the second resolution is the ability to recover any costs from a grant and/or loan from the time the resolution is adopted.
Within the adopted Wastewater Master Plan, it states:
Wastewater generated in Twentynine Palms is currently treated in septic tanks or leach fields and discharged in the ground. The exceptions to this are the Mainside area of MCAGCC and some of the new subdivisions and businesses which contain on-site wastewater collection and treatment systems. The City is concentrated around commercial areas which run along State Highway 62, also known as Twentynine Palms Highway, and Adobe Road, which runs north to the Military Base. These areas contain the majority of multifamily and relatively dense single family land uses. Less dense single family and rural living are located in the majority of the remainder of the City. As population growth continues and more lands are urbanized, water usage, and therefore, septic loading within the District service area is anticipated to increase. As per SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) the City will grow to 35K by 2035, we are currently at 28K.
Given that groundwater is currently the area's only source of water supply, understanding the potential effects of growth on water use and sewer loadings to the groundwater is very important. To this end, the City and the District prepared a Salt and Nutrient Management Plan (SNMP) to assess the long-term potential impacts to groundwater quality from the continued use of septic systems. This WWMP (Waste Water Master Plan) incorporates the findings of the analysis and assess the need for sewers and its implications as a wastewater treatment disposal alternative. Managing housing density can prolong the need for wastewater treatment that would be within regulatory standards. The City currently has 18 approved tract maps that equate to approximately 1,700 dwelling units.
Also for the Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Overview it states:
The guidelines prepared for salt/nutrient management plan was used to develop a comprehensive strategy to monitor and protect the groundwater resources in the area, analyzes nutrient loadings for the various groundwater basins in the area and evaluates loading reductions to balance these basins to avoid potential water quality impacts because of septic systems in the Twentynine Palms area. In addition to the objectives of the SNMP, the premise of developing the WWMP was that if the continued discharges from septic tanks would unreasonably degrade the groundwater quality and result in widespread groundwater pollutions and compliance issues, the need for a community wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system would be promoted through the WWMP. This will help the District and the City make informed decisions on wastewater management while protecting groundwater resources. Collectively, the SNMP and WWMP serve as two major elements of the overall management plan developed by the City and District for assessing the potential impact on groundwater quality from the existing septic systems and anticipated future development.
Funding Opportunity
• State Funding of $350M for septic to sewer conversions for Disadvantage Communities (DAC) • This funding is a “Race to the Start and a Race to the Finish” • This November/December 2022, State Water will be looking for pre-applications to identify who and how much DACs will be potentially applying
• No later than March 2023, a full application needs to be submitted to State Water to apply for the funds • Shovel Ready is the Key, there are 29 potential projects, including Twentynine Palms, at the State level but, it is unclear who will be ready to apply and complete • Construction needs to start by 2024 and construction needs to be complete by June 2026 • The program allows the City to apply for 100% of the funds needed, however there is only $350M for the entire state
• The high-level estimate with the low level of design is $126-200M • So, if we can NOT get 100% granted, we need to adjust scope or augment funding • There are three components of the project:
o Building the System (Collection System and Treatment Plant) o Private Property Connections
o Sewer Rates for operations
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The Initial Study (IS) is underway.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council could choose not to approve this Resolution and not pursue funding for the Wastewater/Sewer project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is NOT any fiscal impact for this Resolution.
CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSMENT
THROUGH THE CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (CWSRF)
WHEREAS, the City of Twentynine Palms (the "Agency") desires to finance the costs of constructing and/or reconstructing certain public facilities and improvements relating to its water system, including certain treatment facilities, pipelines and other infrastructure (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Agency intends to finance the construction and/or reconstruction of the Project or portions of the Project with moneys ("Project Funds") provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board); and
WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the "Obligations"), and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of the Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds the Agency desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the "Expenditures") with respect to the Project from available moneys of the Agency; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that those moneys to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the Agency for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA ORDER AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Agency hereby states its intention and reasonably expects to reimburse Expenditures paid prior to the issuance of the Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds.
SECTION 2. The reasonably expected maximum principal amount of the Project Funds is $158,500,000
SECTION 3. This resolution is being adopted no later than 60 days after the date on which the Agency will expend moneys for the construction portion of the Project costs to be reimbursed with Project Funds.
SECTION 4. Each Agency expenditure will be of a type properly chargeable to a capital account under general federal income tax principles.
SECTION 5. To the best of our knowledge, this Agency is not aware of the previous adoption of official intents by the Agency that have been made as a matter of course for the purpose of reimbursing expenditures and for which tax-exempt obligations have not been issued.
SECTION 6. This resolution is adopted as official intent of the Agency in order to comply with Treasury Regulation §1.150-2 and any other regulations of the Internal Revenue Service relating to the qualification for reimbursement of Project costs.
SECTION 7. All the recitals in this Resolution are true and correct and this Agency so finds, determines and represents.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the _______ day of December, 2022.
______________________________
Karmolette O’Gilvie, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Cindy Villescas CMC, City Clerk
I, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-____ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms at a regular meeting thereof held on ___ day of December, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER:
________________________________
Cindy Villescas CMC, City Clerk
CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TWENTYNINE
PALMS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION FOR
THE CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (CWSRF)
WHEREAS, the City of Twentynine Palms wishes to apply for the Wastewater Treatment System Project
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms (the “Entity”), as follows:
The City Manager of the City of Twentynine Palms (the “Authorized Representative”) or designee is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of the Entity, a Financial Assistance Application for a financing agreement from the State Water Resources Control Board for the planning, design, and construction of Wastewater Treatment System (the “Project”).
This Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water Resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.
The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the Entity in carrying out the Entity’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the Entity and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the day of December, 2022.
Karmolette O'Gilvie, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cindy Villescas, CMC City Clerk
I, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of December, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER:
Cindy Villescas CMC, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Clerk
FOR MEETING: Dec 13 2022
SUBJECT: Certification of Election Results.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council adopt Resolution No. 22-___ confirming and certifying the November 8, 2022 election results.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE:
Request Staff Report (City Clerk Presenting)
Council Questions of Staff
Request Public Comment
Council Discussion
Motion/Second
Discussion of Motion
Call the Question
ATTACHMENTS:
• Election Certification Resolution
•
Report_FinalCertifiedElectionSummaryResults_2022-
12-08
• Certification_ElectionResults_2022-12-08
BACKGROUND:
The County Registrar of Voters has submitted to the City of Twentynine Palms, certification of the 2022 General Election held on November 8, 2022. The certified results indicate incumbent Daniel Mintz Sr in District 3, incumbent McArthur Wright in District 5 and Octavious Scott in District 4 as the newly elected Councilmembers for the City of Twentynine Palms.
Prior to seating the newly elected Councilmembers, the information provided by the County of San Bernardino Registrar of Voters must be certified by the City. Resolution No. 22-___ is available for adoption and included as Exhibit "A" of this Resolution is the certification packet submitted by the Registrar of Voters.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
N/A
ALTERNATIVES:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA CONFIRMING AND CERTIFYING
THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022 ELECTION RESULTS
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly consolidated the City Council elections with the General Elections; and
WHEREAS, the consolidated election was duly conducted on November 8, 2022 and the County Registrar of Voters has canvassed the results as required by Section 17080 et. Seq. of the California Elections Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now must certify the results of the election and canvass as set out here.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms, does hereby confirm and certify as follows:
Section 1.
The following persons are declared as the City Councilmembers for a four-year term to commence December 13, 2022:
Daniel Mintz Sr. District 3
Octavious Scott District 4
McArthur Wright District 5
Section 2.
A statement of the results of the elections is attached as Exhibit “A”, and the results as set out herein are hereby certified.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2022 by the following vote:
___________________________________
Karmolette O’Gilvie, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Cindy Villescas, CMC City Clerk
I do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-____ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of December, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER:
_____________________________
Cindy Villescas CMC, City Clerk
r-++;._4s» -2
Elector Group Counting Group
Total Mail Ballot
Designated Mail Ballot
Polling Place
Provisional
Total
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Voters Cast: 458,946 of 1,138,702 (40.30%)
Cards Cast: 1,376,136
Election Summarv Report
San Bernardino County
Statewide General Election
November 8, 2022
Summary #28
Cards Cast
1,170,390
6,412
191,721
7,613
1,376,136
Voters Cast
390,345
2,132
63,930
2,539
458,946
Registered Voters
,138,702
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Final Certi?ed
Election Results
Turnout
34.28%
0.19%
5.51%;
o.22%§
40.30%?
State of California Governor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946 / 1,138,702 40.30%; Undervotes 3,754 13 S45 32 4,344
Overvotes 84 0 16 2 102
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
BRIANDAHLE REP 191,267 1,499 44,962 1,381 239,109 52.61% GAVIN NEWSOM DEM 195,240 620 18,407 1,124 215,391 47.39% Total Votes
mu 2,119 63,369 2,505 454,500
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 O O 0
Page: 1 of 78
ITimesCast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
ANGELAE.UNDERWOOD
JACOBS
ELENIKOUNALAKIS
Total Votes
Party
REP
DEM
MailBallot Designated M
390,345
9,344
40 Mail Ballot
186,778
194,183
380,961
Mail Ballot
2,132
27 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
1,480
625'
2,105
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
63,930
1,423
11 Polling Place
44,406
18,090
62,496
Polling Place
Provisional
2,539
85 0
Provisional
1,355
1,099
2,454
Provisional
Total
458,946 / 1,138,702
10,879
51 Total
234,019
213,997
448,016
Total
40. 30%
State of California Lieutenant Governor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
ROB BERNOSKY
SHIRLEYN. WEBER
Total Votes
Party
REP
DEM
Mail Ballot Designated M
390,345
8,196
48 MailBallot
185,495
196,606
382,101
MailBallot
2,132
32 O
Designated
Mail Ballot
1,479
621
2,100
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
63,930
1,272
9 Polling Place
43,932
18,717
62,649
Polling Place
Provisional
2,539
93 O
Provisional
1,300
1,146
2,446
Provisional
Total
458,946 / 1,138,702 40.30%
9,593
57 Total
232,206 51.
68 %
%
217,090 48.32
%? 449,296
Total
State of California Secretary of State (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
V Overvotes
Candidate
MALIAM. COHEN
LANHEEJ. CHEN
Total Votes
DEM
REP
Mail Ballot Designated M
390,345
9,373
69 Mail Ballot
188J40
192763
__3§a9o3
Mail Ballot
2,132
34 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
610
1,488
2,098
Designated
MailBallot
0 Polling Place
63,930
1,433
8 Polling Place
8,272
44,217
62489_
Polling Place
Provisional
2,539
94 0
Provisional
1.101
1,344
2,445
Provisional
Total
458,946/ 1,138,702 40.30%
10,934
77 Total
208,123 46.46%
239,812 53.54%
’ 447,935
Total
State of California Controller (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Unresolved Write—
UnresolvedWrite—|n
Unresolved Write-In
52. 47. 23
Page: 2 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Page: 3 78
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
FIONA MA
JACKM. GUERRERO
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
390,345
10,392
29 Mail Ballot
190,655
189,269
379.924
Mail Ballot
2,132
42 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
625
1,465
2,090
Designated
Mail Ballot
Polling Place
63,930.
1,536
7 Polling Place
17,855
44,532
62,387
PollingPlace
Provisional
2.539
87 Provisional
1,092
1,359
2,451 ,
Provisional
Total
458,946 / 1,138,702 40.30
%; 12,057
37 Total
210,227 47.05%
236,625 52.95%
446,852
Total
State of California Treasurer (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
State of California Attorney General (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539
Undervotes 8,598 29 1,403 102
Overvotes 47 O 9 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Mail Ballot
ROB BONTA DEM 193,189 623 18,541 1,140
NATHANHOCHMAN REP 188,511 1,480 43,977 1,297
Total Votes 381,700 62,518
_ V 2,437»
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
0 0 0 0
State of California Insurance Commissioner (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539
Undervotes 10,434 38 1,651 106
Overvotes 48 O 9 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional MailBallot
ROBERTHOWELL REP 182,622 1,463 43,423 1,287
RICARDOLARA DEM 197,241 631 18,847 1,146
Total Votes 379,863 2,094 62,270 2,433
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
O 0' O 0
Total
458,946/ 1,138,702
10,132
56 Total
213,493
235,265
448,758b Total
Total
458,946 / 1,138,702
12,229
57 Total
228,795
217,865
446,660
Total
40.30 %;
47.57%
52.43%
40.30%
51.22%
48. 78
%:
Unresolved Write—|n
UnresolvedWrite—|n
DE
M
REP
UnresolvedWrite—|n
12/8/20228:09:36AM
of
592 11,716
1,497 29,887
2,089 41,603
State of California Member, State Board of Equalization District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 2,300 of 2,300 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 249,907 2,127 42,705 1,691 296,430 / 776,843 38.16%:
Undervotes 6,905 38 1,100 171 8,214
Overvotes 22 O 2 25
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
JOSE S. ALTAMlRANO 118,257 661 131,226 4S‘53%;
TED GAINES 124,723 858 156,965 54.47%:
Total Votes 242,980 1,519 288,191
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O 0 0 O
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
DAVID DODSON
MIKESCHAEFER
Total Votes
Party
DEM
DEM
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
140,438 5 21,225
31 4 6,593
115 O 23
MailBallot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
44,673 0 6,182
64,025 1 8,427
103,598
. .. . . ....lf‘:59?..
MailBallot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
O 0 0
Provisional
848
293
Provisional
231
323
554-
Provisional
Total
162,516 / 361,859 44.
38,515 91%;
139
Total
51,086 41.24%‘
72,776 58.
76%
%
123,862
Total
State of California Member. State Board of Equalization District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:465 of 465 (100.00%)
United States United States Senator (Full Term) (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946/ 1,138,702 40.30% Undervotes 11,478 44 2,239 83 13,844
Overvotes 124 1 11 2 138
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
ALEXPADILLA DEM 197,682 631 - 18,992. 1,189 218,494 49.10%» MARKP. MEUSER REP 181,061 1,456 42,688 1,265 226,470 50.90% Total Votes 2,087 61,680
I M 2,454 444,964
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0 0 0
Unresolved Write-In
DE
M
REP
Unresolved Write-In
Page: 4 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36AM
Times Cast
Undervotes
]Overvotes
Candidate
ALEXPADILLA
MARKP. MEUSER
;Total Votes
Party
DEM
REP
Mail Ballot Designated M
390,345
13,758
61 Mail Ballot
194,864
181,662
376,526
Mail Ballot
2,132
51 1
Designated
Mail Ballot
631
1,449
2,080
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
63.930
2,727
5 PollingPlace
18,632
42.566
61,198
Polling Place
Provisional
2,539
87 O
Provisional
1,178
1,274
2,452
Provisional
Total
458,946/ 1,138,702 40.
16,623 30%
67 Total
215,305 48.68”/
o_
226,951 51.32%‘
442,256
Total
United States United States Senator (Short Term) (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
105
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
O O 0 O
United States United States Representative District 23 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 1,535 of 1,535 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 139,379 1,869 25,263 1,030 / 381,168 43.
Undervotes 3,970 48 906 111 95%:
Overvotes 0 3 O 10
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
JAY OBERNOLTE REP 78,129 1,290 19,372 569 99,360 61.15%- DEREKMARSHALL DEM 57,273 531 4,982 350 63,136 38.85%
Total votes 135.402 919 162,496
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0,» O O 0 0
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,017 110 321 9 1,457 / 2,848 51.
Undervotes 50 5 21 0- 76 16%
Oven/otes O 0 0 0 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
RAULRUIZ DEM 402 6 518
BRIANE.HAWKINS REP 565 3 863
Total Votes 967 9
Total
United States United States Representative District 25 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
30 75
80 220
300
Unresolved Write—
37.51%
62.49 Unresolved Write~|n
Page: 5 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
United States United States Representative District 28 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 154 of 154 (100.00%)
PETEAGUILAR DEM
JOHN MARKPORTER REP
Totai Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
JUDY CHU
PWESHALLMAN
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—|n
Party
DEM
REP
Mail Ballot Designated M
26,110
919
Mail Ballot
10,929
14,260
25,189
Mail Ballot
106
2 O
Designated
Mail Ballot
36 68
104
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
4,480
174
0 Polling Place
940
3,366
4,306
Polling Place
Provisional
150
32 0
Provisional
51 67
118
Provisional
Total
30,846 / 53,060
1,127
Total
11,956
17,761
29,717
Total
United States United States Representative District 33 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 653 of 653 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
118,472
3,869
10 Mail Ballot
69,325
45,268
1141593
MailBallot
46 1
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
15 30
45 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
18,240
752
Polling Place
6,946
10,541
17:437. . PollingPlace
Provisional
679
97 0
Provisional
302
280
582
Provisional
Total
137,437 / 390,416
4,719
11 Total
76,588
56,119
13.2797...
Total
58. 13
%
4o.23
%§ 59.77%-
35.20%
57.71 %: 42.29
%;
MIKECARGILE
NORMA J. TORRE
S
Total Votes
United States United States Representative District 35 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 375 of 375 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 88,731
Undervotes
Overvotes 15
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
REP 35,276
DEM 50,045
.8‘5.V32‘l
Mail Ballot
3,395 »
1 O
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
Designated
Mail Ballot
Polling Place
13,597
608
PollingPlace
.. . .‘..?e.987.
PollingPlace
Provisional
590
108
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
102,919 / 276,199
4,111
17 Total
43,271
55,520
981.79.‘ .
43.80%
56.20%
Total
37.26 %;
7. 755 5,232
239
243
482
Unresolved Write—|n
Unresolved Write—|n
Page: 6 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
ASlF MAHMOOD
YOUNG KIM
Total Votes
Party
DEM
REP
MailBallot Designated M
16,636 0
555 O
3 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
7,052
9,026
16,078
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
Polling Place
2,029
76 1
Polling Place
562
1,390
1,952
PollingPlace
Provisional
81 18
O
Provisional
34 29
63 Provisional
Total
18,746 / 35,011 53.54
°/oi 649
4 Total
7,648 42.27%;
10,445 57.
18,093 73%
Total
United States United States Representative District 40 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:37 of 37 (100.00%)
State of California State Senator District 18 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,017 110 321 9 1,457 / 2,850 5'l.‘l2
‘j/oi; Undervotes 57 4 22 0 83
;
Overvotes 0 O O O O
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
SSTEVEPADILLA DEM 388 71 , 5 494 35.95%‘
ALEJANDROGALICIA REP 572 228 4 880 64.
05%
;
Total Votes 950 299 9 1,374
‘
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional. Total
Mail Ballot
0 0 O O
State of California State Senator District 22 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 213 of 213 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 53,095 1 7,946 346 61,388 / 159,755 38.43%”
Undervotes 2,294 O 433 71 2,798
Overvotes 1 0 ‘l 0 2
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
VINCENTTSAI REP 22,056 1 26,786 45.72
%: SUSAN RUBIO DEM 28,744 0 31,802 54.
28 %:
TotalVotes 50,800 58,588
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 O: O O
135
140
4,594
2,918
UnresolvedWrite-In
7,512 275
30 76
106
UnresolvedWrite-In
UnresolvedWrite—
Page: 7 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
State of California State Senator District 32 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:55 of 55 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
KELLYSEYARTO REP
BRIAN NASH DEM
Total Votes
MailBallot Designated M
21,628 0
1,101 0
0 MailBallot Designated
Mail Ballot
11,367 _ 0
9,159 0
39:52? 3 ..° _ Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
2,694
122
1 Polling Place
1,776
795
2,571
Polling Place
Provisional
125
25 0
Provisional
52 48
100
Provisional
Total
24,447 / 46,879
1,248
2 52.15%
Total
13,195 56.88
%: 10,002 43.12
23,197 %
Total
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 34 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 1,033 of 1,033 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
THURSTON "SM|1‘|'Y“ SMITH REP
TOM LACKEY REP
Total Votes
Mail Ballot Designated M
64,632 1,201
9,_54_o_131
35 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
27,958 561
27,099 509
55,057 1,070
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
12,737
1,185
. 4.
Polling Place
6,915
... 4,633
Polling Place
Provisional
564
147
O.
Provisional
242
175
417
Provisional
Total
79,134 /H_17O,556
1.11993
39 Total
35,676 52.39%
32,416 47.61%}
68,092_ Total
46.40 %
9 1,377
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 0 0 O
IAN M. WEEKS
EDUARDOGARGA
Total Votes
76 30
106
Times Cast
Undervotes
.Overvotes
Candidate Party
REP
DEM
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place
1,017 110 321
56 20
O 0
MailBallot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
Provisional
9 O
0 Provisional
Total
1,457 / 2,848 51.16
%? 80
0 Total
879 63.83
%; 498 36.17
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 36 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
225
76 301
574
387
961
UnresolvedWrite—
Unresolved Write-In
Unresolved Write—|n
12/8/20228:09:36 A
Page: 8 of 78
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 39 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 141 of 141 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
PAULANDRE MARSH
-JUAN CARRILLO
Total Votes
Pa rty
REP
DEM
MailBallot Designated M
24,595
895
Mail Ballot
10,603
13,096
23.699
MailBallot
7 O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
7 O
7 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
4,017
181
0 Polling Place
2,559
1,277
3,836
Polling Place
Provisional
126
22 0
Provisional
49 55
104
Provisional
Total
28,745 / 97,039
1,098
1 Total
13,218
14,428
27,646
Total
29. 62%:
47.81 %; 52.19
%:
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 41 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 172 of 172 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
MICHAELMCMAHON
CHRIS HOLDEN
Total Votes
Party
REP
DEM
MailBallot Designated M
37,984
1,610
0 Mail Ballot
21,476
14.898
.... _ §§:3..747 Mail Ballot
69 1
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
21 68
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
.5753
308
0 Polling Place
5.200
1,260
6,460
Polling Place
Provisional
226
42 O
Provisional
120
64 184
Provisional
Total
45,047 / 82,393 54.67
%: 1,961
0 Total
26,843 62.30
%; 16,243 37.70
%
43r0..8..5. . __.. _ _. __ Total
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 45 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 512 of 512 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 66,891
Undervotes 2,455
Overvotes 13
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
JAMES C. RAMOS DEM 40,905
JOSEPH (JOE) W. MARTINEZ REP 23,518
Total Votes 64,423
MailBallot
O
97 1
0 Designated
MailBallot
43 53
96 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
10,036
502
1 Polling Place
4,053
5,480
9,533
Polling Place
Provisional
418
67 0
Provisional
193
158
351
Provisional
Total
77,442/ 242,455
3,025
14 Total
45,194
29,209
74,403
Total
31.94 °/
of
60.74 %, 39.26%
;
Unresolved Write-In
Unresolved Write—
47 Unresolved Write—
Page: 9 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36AM
GREG WALLIS REP
‘CHRISTYHOLSTEGE DEM
Total Votes
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 47 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:279 of 279 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 33.245
Undervotes 1.088
Overvotes 2
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
19,452
12,703
32,155
Mail Ballot
643
23 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
410
210
620
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
5,652
224
0 Polling Place
4,495
933
5,428
Polling Place
Provisional
171
16 O
Provisional
92 63
155
Provisional
Total
39,711 / 71,788
1,351
2 .
Total
24,449
13,909
38.358
Total
55.32 %;
63.74%
3626%
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 50 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:346 of 346 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
ELOISEGOMEZ REYES
SHEELASTARK
Total Votes
Party
DEM
REP
Mail Ballot Designated M
81,055
3,288
6 Mail Ballot
46,335
31,426
77,761
Mail Ballot
4 O
O
Designated
MailBallot
3 1
4 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
.7319.02
599
0 Polling Place
4,778
7,225
12,003
Polling Place
Provisional
502
79 0
Provisional
224
199
423
Provisional
Total
94,163 / 249.677 37.71%
3,966
6 Total
51,340 56.92%
?
38,851 43.
08 %‘:
. ...9.9v‘.‘-?‘
Total
FREDDIERODRIGUE
Z
TONI HOLLE
Total Votes
3,183 161
4,684 140
7,867 301
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 53 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 191 of 191 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 54,207
Undervotes 2,558
Overvotes 2
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
DEM
REP
Mail Ballot
0 1
0 O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 1
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
8,324
457
0 PollingPlace
Polling Place
Provisional
373
72 O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
62,905 / 162,243
3,087
2 Total
34,091
25,725
59,819
Total
38. 77
%‘
56.99%:
43.01%
30,747
20,900
51,647
Unresolved Write-In
Unresolved Write-In
Unresolved Write-In
Page: 10 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
1,543
1,619
3,162
1,933
1.756
131 3,689
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 O O O
BERNARDWILLIAMMURPHY
REP
SABRINACERVANTES DE
M
Total Votes
Times Cast
.Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place
3,321 O 537
159 0 23
0 0 0
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
O 383
0 131
0 514
Provisional
15 2
O
Provisional
Total
3,873 / 7,853 49.
184 32%
0 Total
52. 40
%
47. 60%:
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 58 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
State of California Member of the State Assembly District 59 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 73 of 73 (‘lO0.00%)
Mail Ballot
Times Cast 23,398
Undervotes 2,251
Overvotes 3
Candidate Party MailBallot
LEON Q. SIT NON 6,977
PHILLIPCHEN REP 14,167
Total Votes 21,144
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite-In O
Designated M
O
0 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
O
0 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
2,936
228
Polling Place
662
2,045
2,707
PollingPlace
0 Provisional
135
31 O
Provisional
41 63
104
Provisional
0 Total
26,469 / 51,850
2,510
4 Total
7,680
16,275
23,955
Total
0 51.05%
32.06%?
67.94%
State of California Chief Justice, Supreme Court (PATRICIA GUERRERO) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot
Times Cast 390,345
Undervotes 70,819
Overvotes 65
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
YES 203,569
NO 115,892
Total Votes
W 319,461
Mail Ballot
0 Designated M
2.132
466
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
750
916
1,666
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
63.930
12,187
8 Polling Place
24,168
27,567
51,735
Polling Place
Provisional
2,539
409
1 Provisional
1,284
845
2.129
Provisional
Total
458,946 / 1,138,702
83,881
Total
229,771
145,220
374,991
Total
40.30%:
61.27%%
38.73%;
Unresolved Write~|n
74 Unresolved Write—
Page: 11 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Page: 12 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36AM
State of California Associate Justice, Supreme Court (GOODWIN LIU) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 390,345 2,132
Undervotes 75,800 490
Overvotes 66 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
YES 191,508 750
NO 122,971 892
Total votes 314,479
MailBallot Designated
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0
Polling Place
63,930
13,243
10 Polling Place
22,322
28,355
50,677
Polling Place
0 Provisional
2,539
497
0 Provisional
1,191
851
2,042
Provisional
0 Total
458,946 / 1,138,702
90,030
76 40.30%:
Total
215,771
153,069
368,840
58.500/oi
41.50%;
Total
0 State of California Associate Justice, Supreme Court (MARTIN J. JENKINS) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (10000%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 390,345 2,132
Undervotes 78,680 500
Overvotes 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
YES 193,266 762
NO 118,342 870
Total Votes 311,608
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite-In 0 0
Polling Place
93-930
13,729
Polling Place
22,832
27,364
Polling Place
0 50,196
A
Provisional
2,539
529
0 Provisional
1,142
868
....;.'01,0
Provisional
0 Total
458,946 / 1,138,702
93,438
62 40.30%
Total
218,002
147,444
365,446
59.65%
40.35%
Total
0 State of California Associate Justice, Supreme Court (JOSHUA P. GROBAN) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 390,345 2,132
Undervotes 80,805 509
Overvotes 72 1
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated
MailBallot
.YES 186,255 761
NO 123,213 861
Total Votes 309,468 1,622
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
63,930
14,131
7 Polling Place
21,870
27,922
49,792
Polling Place
Provisional
2,539
543
0 Provisional
1,060
936
1,996
Provisional
Total
458,946/ 1,138,702
95,988
80 40.30%
Total
57.86%:
42.14%
209,946
152,932
362,878
Total
Unresolved Write—|n
YES
NO
Total Votes
Page: 13 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36A
M
State of California Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 1 (JUDITH MCCONN ELL) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946 / 1,138,702 40.30%‘ Undervotes 84,363 539 14,422 708 100,032
Overvotes 68 0 12 0 80
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
192,918 774 22,966 1,003 217,661 60.66%:
112,996 819 26,530 828 141,173 39.34%;
305,914 1,593 49,496 1,831 358,834
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 O 0 0
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 1 (TRUC T. DO) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946/1,138,702 40.30%‘ Undervotes 85,943 562 14.819 711 102,035
Overvotes 41 0
I H A 43 0 45
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
YES 177,253 681 19,901 928 198,763 55.70%
NO 127,108 889 29,206 900 158,103 44.30%:
Total Votes
p 7‘ 304,361‘ 1,570 49,107 1,828 356,866
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 O 0 O 0
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 1 (MARTIN N. BUCHANAN) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946/ 1,138,702 40.30%:
Undervotes 87,950 556 14,924 713 104,143
Overvotes 1 0 85
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
YES 184,774 ' 737 22,338 978 208,827 58.87%;
NO 117,544 838 26,661 848 145,891 41 .13%§
Total Votes 392,3is _1V_,s_7__548,999 1,826 354,718
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 0 0 O
77
Page: 14 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
State of California Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 2 (MANUEL A. RAMIREZ) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946 / 1,138,702 40.30%:
Undervotes 86,681 562 14,642 716 102,601
Overvotes 92 0 13 0 105
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
210,114 940 29,955 1,210 242,219 67.99%:
NO 93,458 630 19,320 613 114,021 32.01%
Totaivotes 303.572 1.570 49275 .1623.
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0 0 0 0
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 2 (MICHAEL J. RAPHAEL) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946]1,138,70240.30% Undervotes
1 89,176 569 15,218 720 105,683
Overvotes 49 8 0 59
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
YES 183,676 720 21,729 1,005 207,130 58.64%
NO 117,444 841 26,975 814 146,074 41.36%
Total Votes 301,120 1,561 48,704 1,819 353,204
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O 0 0 O 0
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 2 (CAROL D. CODRINGTON) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946/ 1,138,702 40.30%:
Undervotes 88,382 552 15,106 723 104,763
Overvotes 86 O 15 0 101
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
YES 211,805 957 28,431 1,110 242,303 68.43%
NO 90,072 623 20,378 706 111,779 31.57%
Total Votes 301,877 1,580 48,809 1,816 354,082
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
MailBallot
Unresolved Write»|n 0 O O O
YE
Page: 15 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36A
M
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 2 (FRANK MENETREZ) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946 / 1,138,702 40.30%:
Undervotes 89,350 565 15,291 742 105,948
Overvotes 77 0 8 2 87
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
YES 176,612 693 20,824 950 199,079 56.41%
NO 124,306 874 27,807 845 153,832 43.59%
Total Votes
p 1,567 48,631 1,795 352,911
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite—ln 0 0 0 O 0
State of California Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 3 (KATHLEEN E. O'LEARY) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946/ 1,138,702 40.30% Undervotes 88,788 558 15,229 740 105,315
Overvotes 81 V 0 8 0 89
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
YES 194,719 805 23,455 1,019 219,998 62.23%:
NO 106,757 769 25,238 780 133,544 37.77%
Total Votes 301,476 1,574 1,799 353,542
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—ln 0 0 0 0 0
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 3 (VVILLIAM W. BEDSWORTH) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 390,345 2,132 63,930 2,539 458,946 / 1,138,702 40.30% Undervotes 90,566 565 15,548 751 107,430
Overvotes 66 0 4 0 70
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
.YES 180,947 799 23,310 929 205,985 58.61%
NO 118,766 768 25,068 859 145,461 41.39%
Total Votes 299,713 1,567 48,378 1,788 351,446H MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
0 0 0 O O Unresolved Write-In
Page: 16 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 3 (MAURICE SANCHEZ) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total "TimesCast 390,240 2,140 63,909 2,538 458,827 / 1,138,702 40.29% Undervotes 86,751 ' 535 14,441 741 102,468
Overvotes 67 0 11 0 78
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
YES 185,942 715 22,206 1,016 209,879 58.91%‘
NO 117,480 890 27,251 781 146,402 41.09%
Total Votes 1,605 49,457 356,281
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite-In 0 0 0 0 0
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 3 (EILEEN C. MOORE) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total -Times Cast 390,240 2,140 63,909 2,538 458,827 / 1,138,702 40.29%% Undervotes 88,902 545 14,817 752 105,016
Overvotes O 10 O 53
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
194,503 855 24,076 1,004 220,438 62.31%:
106,792 740 25,006 782 133,320 37.69%:
Total Votes 301,295
7 49,082 1,786 353,758
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O 0 O O 0
State of California Associate Justice, Court of Appeal 4th Appellate District, Division 3 (JOANNE MOTOIKE) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total iTimesCast 390,240 2,140 63,909 2,538 458,827 / 1,138,702 40.29% Undervotes 91,192 561 15,421 749 107,923
i
Overvotes 31 0 6 0 37
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
YES 180,286 703 20,602 968 202,559 57.73%:
NO 118,731 876 27,880 821 148,308 42.27%;
Total Votes 299,017 1,579 48,482 1,789 350,867
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n O O 0 0 O
YE
S
NO
43
State of California Superintendent of Public Instruction (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
LANCERAYCHRISTENSEN
TONY K.THURMOND
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
390,240
72,252
234
Mail Ballot
139,394
178,360
317,754
Mail Ballot
2,140
490
1 Designated
Mail Ballot
904
745
1,649
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
63.909
14,019
57 Polling Place
28,582
21,251
49,833
Polling Place
Provisional
2,538
605
0 .
Provisional
936
997
1,933
Provisional
Total
458,827 / 1,138,702
87,366
292
40. 29%
?
Total
169,816
201,353
371,169
45.75%
54.25%
Total
San Bernardino County Member, Board of Education Area A (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:664 of 664 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
RYANMCEACHRON
SENDI FREGOSO
KENLARSON
Total Votes
Party
MailBallot Designated M
67,827
11,677
69 Mail Ballot
24,162
9,832
22,087
56,081
Mail Ballot
1,008
219
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
385
121
283
789
Designated
MailBallot
0 Polling Place
12,879
2,269
10 Polling Place
5,802
1,830
2,968
10,600
Polling Place
Provisional
450
128
1 Provisional
36 108
321
Provisional
Total
82,164 / 218,448
14,293
80 37.61
%?
Total
30,485 44.97%
11,860 17.49%
25,446 37.54%’
67,791
Total
UnresolvedWrite—
77 UnresolvedWrite-In
12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Page: 17 of 78
San Bernardino County Member, Board of Education Area B (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 287 of 287 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undenjvotes
Overvotes
Candidate
GWEN DOWDY RODGER
S
‘GILNAVARRO
OSCARHINOJOSA
Total Votes
"TimesCast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
ROBERTH. BENNETT
RlTAMARIAFERNANDEZLOOF
J. STEVEGARCIA
Total Votes
Party
Party
Mail Ballot
91,478
21,004
70 Mail Ballot
24,436
30,382
15,586
70,404
Mail Ballot
Mail Ballot
56,947
9,634
74 Mail Ballot
29,467
15,170
2,602
47,239
Mail Ballot
Designated M
43 10
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
18 8
33 Designated
MailBallot
0 Designated M
138
37 O
Designated
MailBallot
66 30
101
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
14,432
3,788
7 Polling Place
4,160
4,082
2,395
0,637
Polling Place
Polling Place
8,979
1,823
13 Polling Place
3,574
3,029
540
7,143
Polling Place
Provisional
545
194
0 Provisional
130
138
83 351
Provisional
Provisional
366
87 2
Provisional
137
114
26 Provisional
Total
106,498 / 237,549
24,996
77 Total
28,744
34,609
18,072
81,425
Total
Total
66,430 / 214,241
11,581
89 Total
33,244
18,343
3,173
54,760
Total
44.83%
35.30%
42.50%
:
22.19%
31.01 %?
60. 7133.50
%5.79%
San Bernardino County Member, Board of Education Area D (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 493 of 493 (100.00%)
Unresolved Write—|n
277
UnresolvedWrite—
Page: 18 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
u
_.j-'—-:
T
I
_j._____.. nn1_.-:n_n—
2 :.E 1.3- 1-1. —-1 —- r11
ERNESTM BELLJ
R
LORICISNEROS
Total Votes
CHRISTINASCRIVNE
R
JENNIFERSLAYTON
Total Votes
Page: 19 of 78
County of Kern Member, Board of Education Area 7 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 12 65 1 0 78/ 176 44.32%;
Undervotes 1 14 O 0 15
Overvotes 0 O O O O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
1 O 25
O 0 38
1 0 63
MailBallot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 O O O
Kern Community College District Member, Governing Board Area 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:8 of 8 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 293 60 144 12 509 / 946 53.81%
Undervotes 73 9 43 4 129
Overvotes 0 0 O 0 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
29 44 2 177
S7 6 203
51 101 8 380
MailBallot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—ln 0 O 0 O 0
San Bernardino Community College District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 116 of 116 (100.00%]
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 25,531 5 3,924 201 29,661 /62,140 47.73%:
Undervotes 4,938 0 934 47 5,919
‘
Overvotes 1O 0 1 0 11
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
CHRISTIANTHOMAS
SHAUGHNESSY
9,056 4 1,634 90 10,784
NATHAN D. GONZALES 11,527 1 1,355 64 12,947
Total Votes 20,583 5 2,989 154 23,731
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O 0 O O
45.44%‘
54.56%
Unresolved Write-In
46.58 %; 53.42%
220
118 22
102
39.68 %60.32
22 29
51 12/8/20228:09:36 A
JOSEPHW. BRADY
BLANCAAZUCENAGOMEZ
Total Votes
BRANDON A.WOOD
LYNNEE.LITCHFIEL
D
Total Votes
Page: 20 of 78
Victor Valley Community College District Member, Governing Board Area 2 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:39 of 39 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 11,825
Undervotes 1,556
Overvotes
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—ln 0
Victor Valley Community College District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:75 of 75 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 14,628
Undervotes 3,026
Overvotes 9
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
9,209
2,384
7 11,593
MailBallot
0 Apple Valley Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 1 (Vote for 1)
Polling Place
1.838
Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
Polling Place
2,537
Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
Provisional
79 22
O
Provisional
Provisional
O
Provisional
64 19
O
Provisional
35 10
45 Provisional
0 12/8/2022 8:09:36 A
M
Total
13,742 / 40.330
1.885
34.07%
Total
67.87%:
32.13%
8,042
3,807
1,849
Total
Total
17,229 /43,980
3,654
39. 7%3
Total
10,741
2,825
....l..3'-79.5.
79.18%
20.82%
Total
11 Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
0 0 O 0
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
GARYARCE
CHRISNUNEZ
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
4,362 12
S53 1
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
9 Polling Place
959
95 0
Polling Place
Provisional
47 23
O
Provisional
16 8
Total
5,380/ 10,758 50.01%
672
0 Total
2,720 57.77%
1,988 42.23%
4.708
Precincts Reported: 32 of 32 (100.00%)
485
379
864
2,210
1,599
3. Unresolved Write—
24 1,497
431
1,928
‘Unresolved Write-In
6,886
3,376
10,262
1,124
406
1,530 57
25 32
AMANDA BUCHANA
N
JOE W. RUSSELL
WILSON F. SO
Total Votes
Page: 21 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36AM
Apple Valley Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 2 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:8 of 8 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3,547
489
3 Mail Ballot
1,418
918
3,055
Mail Ballot
O
0 O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
558
83 2
Polling Place
194
158
121
473
Polling Place
Provisional
17 2
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
4,122 / 9,578
574
5 Total
1,620
878
1,045
3,543
Total
43.04%
45.72%‘
24.78%
29.49%
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
BENROSENBERG
AARON THOMASHELDRETH
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
850
66 2
Mail Ballot
241
782
Mail Ballot
119
11 0 . Designated
Mail Ballot
25 83
108
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
208
Polling Place
52 146
198
Polling Place
Provisional
S
1 0
Provisional
Provisional
Total
1,182 / 2,918 40.51%.
87 3
Total
773
1,092
Total
Barstow Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:43 of 43 (100.00%)
MICHAELSHANEWATSON
LATRINAL.WALLACE
Total Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
924 26
122 6
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
13 20
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
244
31 0
Polling Place
135
78 213
Polling Place
Provisional
S
1 O
Provisional
4 Provisional
Total
1,199/3,322 36.09
%: 160
0 Total
651
388
1,039
Total
Barstow Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
62.66%
37.34%
501
301
802
Unresolved Write-In
UnresolvedWrite541
319 29.
21%; 70.79
UnresolvedWrite—|n
719
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
~KELLYOHLSON
CATHYHERRICK
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
1,327
227
0 Mail Ballot
O
O
O
Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
261
46 1
Polling Place
107
107
214
Provisional
8 5
0 Provisional
Total
1,596 / 2.450 65.
278 14%;
1 Total
503 38.19%=
814 61.81%;
Page: 22 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Bear Valley Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 1 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2_1of21 (100.00°/o)
396 0
704 0
1,100 0 1,317
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 0 0 0
Bear Valley Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 3 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 22 of 22 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
SONJA SHAW
CHRISTINAGAGNIER
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
10,311 0
1,275 0
4 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
4,553 0
4,479 0
9,032 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
1,151
143
1 PollingPlace
624
383
1,007
Polling Place
Provisional
46 22
O
Provisional
13 11
24 Provisional
Total
11,508/ 22,455 51.25
%: 1,440
5 Total
5,190
4,873
10,063
Total
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,190 O 175 32 1,397 / 2,206 63.33%;
Undervotes 264 O 21 14 299
Overvotes 0 O 1 0' 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
PAUL ZAMOYTA 0 94 13 723 65.91%
LIZETTEGRAU 0 59 5 374 34.09%
Total Votes 0 153 18 1,097
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 O 0 0
Chino Valley Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 3 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 25 of 25 (100.00%)
Unresolved Write—|n
48. 51.
616
310
926
‘; ‘_'.';::. .":.':-.—':.'"'
I
I
--1I--
Page: 23 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Chino Valley Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1)
JON MONROE
LISAE.GREATHOU
SE
Total Votes
Precincts Reported:30 of 30 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 10,363 0 1,405 68» 11,836 / 22,596 52.38%;
Undervotes 1,418 O 199 22 1,639
Overvotes 0 1 0 8
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
0 833 28 5,622 55.18%?
0 372 18 4,567 44.82%:
0 1,205 45 10,189
;
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n O O 0 O O
Colton Joint Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 1 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 112 of 112 (100.00%)
11,398 71.42
%;
4,562 28.
2 15,960 58%
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O 0 0 O
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
ANGELMARTIN
ISRAELFUENTESJR
Total Votes
UnresolvedWrite»ln
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
16,425 4
2,786 3
10 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
3,372 1
10,257 0
13.§219 1
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 0
Polling Place
2,751
519
Polling Place
784
1,446
2,230
PollingPlace
0 Provisional
94 27
0 Provisional
14 53
67 Provisional
0 Total
19,274757,764 33.37%;
3,335
1 1 "12
Total
4,171 26.19%;
11,756 73.81%
15937. . Total
0 Colton Joint Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 3 (Vote for Precincts Reported: 112 of 112 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
JOANNE ELISABETH
THORING-OJEDA
LARISSAHAWKINS
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
16,425 4
2,740 2
0 MailBallot Designated
Mail Ballot
9,987 0
3,691
13,678
Polling Place
2,751 1
540
0 Polling Place
1,359
852
2,211
Provisional
94 25
O
Provisional
Total
19,274 / 57,764 33.37%
3,307
7 Total
17 69
Unresolved Write—|n
52 4,761
4,177
8,938
-—--- ~—+ -+
d-— —---- I
Fontana Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:33 of 33 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 7,351 24 1,028 47 8,450 / 23,371 36.16%;
Undervotes 911 3 120 10 1,044
Z
Overvotes 12 0 1 O 13
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
MARIAISABELARIAS O 75 4 541 7.32%
MARSSERNA 6 305 22 3,449 46.65%
TERRYMCCAFFREY 11 254 1,316 17.80%
LAURENM. GOMEZ 4 273 2,087 28.23%;
Total Votes 6,428 21 907 37 7,393
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
MailBallot
SHELLEYCBRADFORD
ADAMPEREZ
Total Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
4,077 O
446 0
4 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
1,480
2,147
3,627
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
614
63 0
Polling Place
551
Polling Place
Provisional
26 8
0 Provisional
7 11
18 Provisional
Total
4,717/ 16,811 28.06%’
517
4 Total
1,726 41.13%
2,470 58.87%;
4,196
Total
Fontana Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
331
314
0 645 15
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisiona
Mail l Ballot
O 0 O 0
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
MARYB. SANDOVAL
RAYMANMARTINEZ
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
4,349
472
1 Mail Ballot
0 703
O 58
O 0
Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
O
0 Provisional
25 10
O
Provisional
13 Total
5,077 / 16,881 30.08%
540
1 Total
2,837
1,699
4,536
Total
Fontana Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 19 of 19 (100.00%)
62.54%
37.46%
2,493
1,383
3,876
Unresolved Write-In
239
312
Unresolved Write—|n
3,116
1,044
1,806
UnresolvedWrite-In
462
12/8/20228:09:36A
Page: 24 of 78
Page: 25 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Hesperia Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:48 of 4B (100.00°/o)
205
RAYMONDORTEGAJR
COLIN OPSETH
ERICSWANSON
CRISSEDAM. GARGALL
O
Total Votes
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,673 60 678 26 4,437 / 12,122 36.60%?
Undervotes 596 9 122 8 735
Overvotes O 1 0 8
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
JESSECAIN 368 3 64 437 11.83%
‘CHRISTIANB.STEEN 1,382 14 215 6 1,617 43.77%’
TIM MCLAUGHLIN 778 31 205 4 1,018 27.56%;
ANGELIQUEJOLLY 542 3 71 6 622 16.84%?
Total Votes 3,070 51 555 18 3,694
MailBallot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite-In 0 0 O O O
Hesperia Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 11 of11 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
MailBallot Designated M
2,411
323
7 Mail Ballot
146
151
935
799
995‘
Mail Ballot
O
0 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
O
O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
455
73 1
Polling Place
31 30
148
172
381
Polling Place
Provisional
11 Provisional
8 Provisional
Total
2,877 / 9,800
398
9 Total
179
181
1,138
972
2,470
Total
29.36%
7.25%
7.33%:
46.07 %? 39.35%
Unresolved Write-ln
Page: 26 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Hesperia Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 51 of 51 (100.00%)
CHRISTOPHERCURTIS
CLAIRE
PAUL RODERIC HOFFMAN
BILLGEESON
Total Votes
Precincts Reported: 39 of 39 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 4,245 48 810 18 5,121 /12.368 41.41%;
Undervotes 638 11 137 3 789
Overvotes 0 O 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
MARKDUNDON 1,648 18 198 9 1,873
JAMES MADISON BLOCKERV
1381 14 382 5 1,782
ANNA C. GHAN 576 S 93 675
Total Votes 3.605 37 673 15 4,330
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—ln 0 0 0 0 0
Morongo Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1) Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,792 2 S33 23 4,350 / 8,344 52.13%
Undervotes 856 0 104 8 968
Overvotes 3 0
g 0 O 3
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
1,139 123 4
835 109
197
429
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
0 0 0 0
1,268
950
1,161
3,
379_
Total
Unresolved Write—|n
37.53 %:
28.11%.
34.36 2,933 15
959
43.26 %? 41.
1515.
59%
'r._...._,__:¢*'_-'
-. ._
-"-r ' 1- —
"r"-—-i"'-‘I "!'"—(—"'-
Page: 27 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36AM
Redlands Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 26 of 26 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 10,139 0 1,467 63 11,669 / 18,630 62.64%
Undervotes 1,399 0 204 11 1,614 ?
Overvotes 5 0 O 6
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
VICTORIAOGUNRINU 1,292 O 15 1,540 15.32%.
ERINNOLAN STEPIEN 2,479 O 16 3,138 31.23%
PATTYS. HOLOHAN 4,964 O 21 5,371 53.45%
Total Votes 8,735 0 52 10,049
I Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O 0 O O 0
Rinl of The World Uni?ed School District Member. Governing Board Area 1 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 49 of 49 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,370 24 342 15 1,751 / 3,493 50.13%
Undervotes 340 6 74 4 424
Overvotes O O O 2
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
JASON S. ROBLEE 316 5 84 4 409
WILLIAM"BILL"P.
MELLINGER 712 13 184 7 916
Total Votes 1,028 18 268 11 1,325
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 O 0 O
30.87%
;69.
643
386
1,262
233
22 7,720
Page: 28 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
San Bernardino City Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board (Full Term) (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported:327 of 327 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 30,929 114 4,587 211 35,841 / 125,308 28.60%.
Undervotes 26,106 151 4,883 227 31,367
Overvotes 474 0 75 0 549
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
PATRICIADEZAN 5,080 19 1,001 36 6,136 8.1
ALEXAVILA 6,377 18 1,121 48 7,564 10.00%
FRANCISCORAMIREZ 5,817 18 773 54 6,662 8.81%:
TRESSYL.CAPPS 3,888 25 738 29 4,680 6.19%
DANNYTILLMAN 10,109 26 1,017 34 11,186 14.79%
VERONICASAIZ 3,876 12 632 45 4,565 6.04%.
ABIGAILMEDINA 10,269 947 40 11,278 14.92%
SONIA FERNANDEZ 918 183 4 1,112 1.47%,
BARBARAFLORES 8,250 15 704 25 8,994 11.90%3
ROSE MARYWARD 3,180 9 592 21 3,802 5.03%;
gA::[:ll§|E'LEN AB”'EZ 8,443 20 1,095 701 9,628 12.73%? Total Votes 66,207 191 8,803 406 75,607
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0 0 0 0
San Bernardino City Unified School District Member, Governing Board (Short Term) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 327 of 327 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 30,929 114 4,587 211 35,841 / 125,308 28.60%:
Undervotes 5,614 43 982 50 6,689
Overvotes 155 O 0 191
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
PRISCILLA 6,743 13 902 62 26.66%
MIKKICICHOCKI 8,513 35 902 33 9,483 32.74%;
ESMERALDANEGRETE 4,304 13 943 26 5,286 18.25%;
MICHAELL.SANTOS 1,734 3 311 20 2,068 7.14%:
TRAVON R. MARTIN 3,866 7 S11 20 4,404 15.21%:i
Total Votes 25,160 71 3,569 161 28,961
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O 0 0 0 O
36
y
—jjnI I
Sierra Sands Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported:5 of 5 (100.00%)
523
Unresolved Write—
CHRISTINA BEHRINGE
R
JOHN E.KOZYRA
Total Votes
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 10 so 1 0 71 / 51 44.10%
Undervotes 8 47 O O 55
.Overvotes O 0 O 0 O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
KURTD. ROCKWELL 1 9 1 o 11 6.96%;
ROBERTCAMPBELL 4 29 0 0 33 20.89%?
MARYCAMPBELL 3 24 0 O 27 17.09%
"COACHEDDINSH 3 23 O 0' 26 16.46%
KARENTAGGART 10 0 0 10 6.33%
NICOLEHARPER 11 O O 16 10.13%:
T. CHAD HOUCK 4 16 1 o 21 13.29%
TIM JOHNSON 2 11 1 O 14 8.86%;
Total Votes 22 133 3 O 158
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O 0 O O
Snowline Joint Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 1 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 2,581 O 507 26 3,114 / 5,367 58.02%
Undervotes O 110 6 639
Overvotes O O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
1,189 12 1,405 56.81%.
867 8 1,068 43.19%
2,056 O 397 20 2,473
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 O O O
204
193
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM Page: 29 of 78
PRISCILLAR. BENADOM
SHANNON NICHOLE
3STEPHENS
SKYLARWAYNE MCCULLA
R
CATHYHESEMAN
VICTORIAFLORES
Total Votes
Trona Joint Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported:3 of 3 (100.00%)
149
118
267
Unresolved Write-In
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 283
.Undervotes 204
Overvotes 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
146
94 137
177
645
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O
O
O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
O
O
O
0 O
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
143
116
0 Polling Place
75 42
72 82
42 313
Polling Place
Provisional
12 5
0 Provisional
S
6 9
5 31
Provisional
Total
438/ 785
325
0 55.80%;
Total
227
141
215
268
138
989
Total
Upland Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area D (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 7 of (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 2,286
Undervotes 518
Overvotes 2
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
CHRlS CRUZ 964
TAUVAGA DANIELHOCHlNG 802
Total Votes 1,766
Mail Ballot
O
0 0
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
O
O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
370
103
0 Polling Place
Polling Place
Provisional
35 13
O
Provisional
12 10
22 Provisional
Total
2,691 / 7,025
634
2 38.31%:
Total
1,125 54.74%
930 45.26%’
Total
2,
22.95%
14.26%:
21. 7427.10
%; 13.95%
Page: 30 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
666 29.20%
;
1,615 70.80%
2,281
Page: 31 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36A
M
Upland Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area E (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 2,529 0 456 15 3,000/7,467 40.18%&
Undervotes 584 O 131 3 718
Overvotes O O 1 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
PETERATTWOOD 534 O 4
MARYA. LOCKE 1,411 O 8
Total Votes 1,945 O
SHARON F. BANNISTE
R
LAURENHERNANDEZ
Total Votes
205
216
306
727 20
128
196
324
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 O O O 0
Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,057 2 613 8 3,680 / 7,193 51.16%?
Undervotes 488 0 107 3 598
Overvotes 0 0 0 2
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
206 3 1,772 57.53%?
300 2 1,308 42.47%
506 5
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O 0 0 0 0
Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Uni?ed School District Member, Governing Board Area 5 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:48 of 48 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 4,226 174 808 27 5,235 / 8,631 60.65%
Undervotes 411 33 80 7 531
Overvotes 5 O 1 O 6
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
TERIBOON 888 38 6 1,137 24.20%:
HElDlLUVSTRIKWERDA 1,309 49 1,581 33.65%i
BOB MILLER 1,613 54 1,980 42.15%
Total Votes 3,810 141 4,698
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write~|n O 0 O 0 0
1,561
1. 2,567
12
DONALD E. ENGLISH
KASSANDRAWILSO
N
Total Votes
Page: 32 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Chaffey Joint Union High School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:63 of 63 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 18,980 0 2,930 104 22,014 / 48,367 45.51%
Undervotes 3,704 0 662 37 4,403
Oven/otes 7 0 2 0 9
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
3,544 0 1,051 29 9,624 54.68%:
6,725 0 1,215 38 7,978 45.32%
15,269 0 2,266 67 17,602
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-ln O O 0 0 0
Victor Valley Union High School District Member, Governing Board Area 2 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 30 of 30 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 4,734 O 906 43 5,683 / 15,716 36.16%:
Undervotes 803 O 209 7 1,019
Overvotes 1 O 0 O 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
CALEBCASTANEDA 1,819 14 2,075 44.50%
KENTHERBERTCROSBY 2,111 455 2,588 55.50%.
Totaivotes 697 36 4,663
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-ln O O O 0 0
Victor Valley Union High School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:71 of71 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 4,833 153 960 30 5,976 / 17,103 34.94%:
Undervotes 961 34 203 8 1,206
Overvotes 0 0 0 2
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
ROSALIO"ROSlE"HINOJOS 2,074 55 414 9 2,552 53.52%
JOSHUA GARCIA 1,796 64 343 13 2,216 46.48%;
Total Votes 3,870 119 22 4,768
2 Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0 0
757'
22 Z42
~RESABARILLAS
CHRISTINAMARlABENT
Z
DIANA ESMERALDA
Total Votes
REBECCADAVIES
BRIEKABIA
Total Votes
1,475
1,166
2,641
Mail Ballot
22 4
26 Designated
MailBallot
O
185
262
447
PollingPlace
11 Provisional Total
54.02%
" 1,437 45.98%
3,125
Page: 33 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Adelanto Elementary School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 8 of 8 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Unresolved Write—ln
Mail Ballot Designated M
1,229 0
115 O
0 Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
449 O
453 O
210 0
1,112 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
192
16 0
Polling Place
66 66
44 176
Polling Place
Provisional
Provisional
Total
1,427/5,657 25.23%?
131
2 Total
519 40.11%
520 40.19%
255 19.71%
1,294
Total
Alta Loma School District Member, Governing Board Area 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 14 of 14 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
~ Overvotes
Candidate Party
ERICN. CHUNG
SANDIE OERLY
Total Votes
Unresolved Write-ln
Mail Ballot Designated M
4,408 1
749 O
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
1,861 0
1,798 1
3,659 1
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
769
138
0 Polling Place
409
222
631
Polling Place
Provisional
20 9
O
Provisional
11 Provisional
Total
5,198 / 8,442 61.57%
896
0 Total
2,273 52.84%;
2,029 47.16%
4.302
Total
Alta Loma School District Member, Governing Board Area 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3.232 28
591 2
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
577
129
1 Polling Place
Provisional
22 11
0 Provisional
Total
3,859 / 7.293 52.91%"
733
Total
Unresolved Write—|n
1,688
3,225
294
1,415
866
239
1,249
2,354
Page: 34 of 78
Alta Loma School District Member, Governing Board Area 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M PollingPlace Provisional Total Times Cast 0 S06 15 3,746/7,077 52.93
%? Undervotes 870 O 121 » 7 998
Overvotes 1 O O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
ERIKM. BRESSLER 0
JAIMEELEESAKAOGHLI 0
MALINDALAURAHURLEY 0
Total Votes 0 8
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 0 O 0
CHUCKCOHN
PAT LASHBROO
K
Total Votes
Central School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
ROXANNEMARIERAMIRE 595 59.74%
Z
YOLANDA MARIESTRONG
REED
Total Votes
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 1.917_
Undervotes 409
Overvotes 0
Candidate Party MailBallot
687
821
1.508
Mail Ballot
‘Unresolved Write—|n 0
0 0
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
332
69 0
Polling Place
162
PollingPlace
Provisional
13 5
0 Provisional
Provisional
Total
2,262 / 4,858
483
0 Total
856
923
1,779
Total
46.56%
48.12 %: 51.88%;
Cucamonga School District Member, Governing Board Area 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 1,054
Undervotes 194
Overvotes 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
501
359
860
Mail Ballot
O
O
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
O
O
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
164
32 0
Polling Place
90 132
PollingPlace
Provisional
5 1
0 Provisional
4 0
4 Provisional
Total
1,223 / 3,288
Total
401
996
Total
37.20%
40.26%
Unresolved Write—
42 227
101
263
37.79 %‘ 10.70%
51.51%
S4
160
385
Unresolved Write-In
2,747
171 1,038
12/8/2022 8:09:36AM
HENRYJAMESCOWLESJR
TALIAORELLANAMAYNO
R
Total Votes
Page: 35 of 78
Cucamonga School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:8 of 8 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 617 100 6 724 / 2,170 33.36%
:
Undervotes 117 1 17 1 136
Overvotes O 0 0 0 0
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
S 292
O 296
S 588
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O O O 0
Etiwanda School District Member. Governing Board Area 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 4,525 0 729 28 5,282 / 11,842 44.60%
Undervotes 737 O 129 11 87.7
Overvotes 1 O O O 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
ZACHARYSCOTTCADMAN 547 0 91 640 14.53%
STEVEN J. CAMP 687 0 125 3 815 18.51%
JANAL URZUA-BARKLEY 597 O 149 5 751 17.05%
FERMINJARAMILLO 1,956 O 235 7 2,198 49.91%
Total Votes 0 600 17 4,404
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O O 0 O 0
49.66%
50.34%
83 253
247
500
Unresolved Write—|n
34 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
__'."L.- _.,-_.--::q'.-_,
-I
Etiwanda School District Member, Governing Board Area 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:7 of 7 (100.00%)
Unresolved Write~|n
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 4,673 0 657 16 5,346/ 12,080 44.25%
Undervotes 546 0 78 6 630
Overvotes 3 O 0 0 3
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
ZSAMUELSAGER 958 O 113 3 1,074 22.79
JORDAN WRIGHT 1,436 0 153 2 1,591 %33.76
%; MATTHEW GORDON 1,730 0 313 5 2,048 43.45%
Total Votes 4,124 0 579 10 4,713
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n O O 0 0 O
Helendale School District Member, Governing Board (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported:3 of 3 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,569 35 449 14 2,067 / 3,984 51.88%
Undervotes 1,959 60 547 25 2,591
Overvotes 0 3 0 3
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
MICHELLELEEANN
TACORONTE
558 7 186 754
AMYC. THOMAS 690 187 894
FRANKM. MELENDEZ 791 235 1,043
CINDY HENSLEY 709 189 916
Total Votes 2,748 45 797 3,607
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
20.90%
24.79%
28.92%
25.40 12
12 14
Page: 36 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
ELVIAM. RIVAS
GEOVANNA NIEVE
S
Total Votes
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 5,015 O 728 23 5,766 / 16,077 35.86%-
Undervotes 884 0 154 1,043
Overvotes 2 0 0 0 2
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
O 301 11 2,971
0 273 1,750
O 574 18 4,721
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 O O 0 0
Ontario-Montclair School District Member, Governing Board Area 3 (Vote for 1)
Page: 37 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Mountain View School District Member, Governing Board Area 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:5 of 5 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
MELISSAMAY
TONY HARKEY
Total Votes
Unresolved Write-In
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
1,911 O
405 0
0 Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
1,059 0
0 1,504 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
205
42 0
PollingPlace
79 84
163
Polling Place
0 Provisional
14 2
0 Provisional
1 12
Provisional
0 Total
2,130 / 5,212
449
2 Total
1,149
530
1,679
Total
0 40.87%f
Ontario-Montclair School District Member, Governing Board Area 2 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:24 of 24 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
KRISTEN'KR|S' BRAKE
CRISOLMENA
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
5,700 O
933 0
2 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
2,945 0
1,820 0
. .. ...4<7.§5. 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
PollingPlace
915
220
2 Polling Place
Polling Place
Provisional
56 24
O
Provisional
26 6
32 Provisional
Total
6,671 / 15,929 39.
41%‘ 1,177
4 Total
3,339 60.82%
2,151 39.18%
5,490
Total
Precincts Reported:22 of 22 (100.00%)
368
325
693
Unresolved Write-In
62.93 %? 37.07%
2,659
1,470
4,129
68.43 %; 31.57%
;
445
1
Page: 38 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Ontario-Montclair School District Member, Governing Board Area 5 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
58 27.62%
64 30.48
%" 88 41.90%
GILBERTORIVERAJR
PAULA RAMIREZ
ROBERTOGARCIAJR
Total Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
SONIAALVARADO
ADRlANNEMARIE
FERNANDEZ
Total Votes
Unresolved Write-In
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3,510
506
3 Mail Ballot
1,938
1.063
3,001
Mail Ballot
O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
O
O
0 Designated
MailBallot
0 Polling Place
489
92 0
Polling Place
246
151
397
Polling Place
Provisional
24 5
0 Provisional
16 19
Provisional
Total
4,023 / 13,294
603
3 Total
2,200
1,217
3,417
Total
Oro Grande School District Member, Governing Board (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 27 of 27 (100.00°/o)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
UnresolvedWrite—In
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
47 40
0 MailBallot
20 10
24 54
MailBallot
114
83 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
35 49
61 145
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
6 S
0 Polling Place
\ll\J-bu
PollingPlace
Provisional
Provisional
Provisional
Total
169/396
128
0 Total
210
Total
30.26%
42.68%
San Bernardino County Member, Board of Supervisors District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 320 of 320 (100.00
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
JESSEARMENDAREZ
LUISCETINA
Total Votes
%)
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
91,168
13,873
57 MailBallot
41,400
35,838
77:33.5}.
Mail Ballot
45 11
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
13 21
34 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
14,365
2,275
11 PollingPlace
6,517
5,562
‘Z.-973..
PollingPlace
Provisional
491
165
0 Provisional
174
152
326
Provisional
Total
106,069 / 250,201
16,324
68 Total
48,1 04
41,573
89,677
Total
42.39%:
53.64%;
46.36%:
Unresolved Write-In
64. 38% 35.62
67 245
72 Unresolved Write—
1,012
876
380
1,048
633
58 200
114
86 163
120-
City of Adelanto Member, City Council (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 25 of 25 (100.00%)
Page: 39 of 78
City of Adelanto Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 25 of 25 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
RONALD BEARD
GABRIELREYES
MONIQUEM. CARRILLO
STEVEVONNAEVANS
. DIANAESMERALDA
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3.165 O
165 O
9 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
331 0
1,446 0
279 0
527 O
408 0
2,991 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0- 0
Polling Place
545
35 3
Polling Place
507
Polling Place
Provisional
13 Provisional
UJLI1
Provisional
Total
3,723 / 15,033
201
12 Total
399
1,696
354
604
457
3,510
Total
24.77%?
11.37%
48.32%
10.09%-
17.21%
13.02 %;
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
EDWARD REYES
AMANDA UPTERGROVE
MIGUELSOTO
BENJAMINSMITH
ANGELO MEZA
HEATHERGAINES
TotalVotes
Unresolved Write-In
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3,165 O
1.978 0
30 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
O
O
O
O
.‘.‘:.3.%%.
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
545
345
4 PollingPlace
741
Polling Place
Provisional
13 10
0 Provisional
GWUJUJOUJ-1>U~'
Provisional
Total
3,723 / 15,033
2,333
34 Total
434
1,216
993
466
1,214
756
5,079
Total
24.77%
3.54 23.94% %
"19.55%
9.18%
23.90%
14.88%
373
47 76
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Town of Apple Valley Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 58 of 58 (100.00%)
MATTHEWRUTLEDG
E
CURTEMICK
Total Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
SCOTTNASSIF
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—|n
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
17,633 0
4,561 O
5 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
13,067 0
13,067 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
3,087
797
1 Polling Place
2,289
2,289
Polling Place
Provisional
102
36 0
Provisional
66 66
Provisional
Total
20,822 / 44,485 46.81 %;
5,394
6 Total
15,422 100.00%
15,422
Total
Town of Apple Valley Member, Town Council District 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 1 3 of 13 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
‘ Overvotes
Candidate
KARILEON
MICHAELKAREN
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—|n
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3,426 0
498 0
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 O
0 Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
Polling Place
612
80 0
Polling Place
350
182
532
Polling Place
Provisional
15 5
.
0 Provisional
Provisional
Total
4,053/10,116 40.07
583 %.’
0 Total
2,382 68.65%
1,088 31.35%
3,470
Total
Town of Apple Valley Member, Town Council District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 9 of 9 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Oven/otes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3,450 0
507 0
0 Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
1,322 0
1,618 0
2,949. 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 0
Polling Place
648
114
0 PollingPlace
238
296
534
PollingPlace
Provisional
17 2
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
4,115 / 10,140 40.58%
623
3 Total
1,569 44.97%
1,920 55.03%
....§.<‘.‘.§9.
.. . .. ..... .. . . . Total
Unresolved Write—|n
901
2,928
2,027
Page: 40 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
MARTHAO'BRIEN
CARMENM. HERNANDEZ
Total Votes
Unresolved Write-In
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
669
64 2
Mail Ballot
Mail Ballot
O
0 0
Designated
MailBallot
O
0 O
Designated
MailBallot
0 Polling Place
168
14 0
PollingPlace
67 87
154
PollingPlace
Provisional
0 0
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
837 / 2,564 32.64
%; 78
2 Total
322 42.54
%’ 435 57.46%:
757
Total
City of Barstow Member, City Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
1 City of Barstow Member, City Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 990 0 231 2 / 3,098 39.48%?
Undervotes 74 0 14 1 89
Overvotes 0 O 0 0 O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
TERRIPERALTA 423 O 1 518 45.68%
JAMESM. NOBLE 493 0 616 54.32%;
Total Votes 916 0 1,134
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite—ln O 0 0 O 0
City of Big Bear Lake, City Council, District 1 (2021) Recall Question (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 8 of 8 (100.00°/o)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 380 O 56 13 449/614 73.13%;
Undervotes 0 1 1 13
1 Overvotes 1 0 O O 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
272 0 40 9 321 73.79%
96 O 15 3 114 26.21%:
368 0 SS 12 435
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O O O 0
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—
NO
YE
94 123
217
255
348
603
Page: 41 of 78
City of Big Bear Lake Member, City Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:8 of 8 (100.00%)
250 37
18 Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
JIM EAKIN
KENDISEGOVIA
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—ln
Mail Ballot Designated M
380 0
62 O
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
0 Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
56 13
0 Polling Place
19 24
43 PollingPlace
Provisional
13 2
Provisional
11 Provisional
Total
449 / 614
77 0
Total
141
231
372
Total
City of Big Bear Lake Member. Citv Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:6 of 6 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
OMAR TORRESCAZARES
RICKHERRICK
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—ln
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
O
O
0 Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
77 O
155 O
232 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
0 Polling Place
13 23
36 Polling Place
Provisional
3 Provisional
Provisional
Total
290 / 493
20 0
Total
179
270
Total
City of Big Bear Lake Member, City Council District 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
RANDALLPUTZ
PAUL J. SOKOLOFF
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
356 O
40 O
0 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
207
109
316
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
76 12
0 PollingPlace
36 28
64 Polling Place
Provisional
10 3
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
442 / 635
55 0
Total
246
141
387
Total
73.13%
37.90%v
62.10%»
58.82 %?
33.70%
66.30%
69.61%
63.57%
36.43%
Unresolved Write—|n
116
202
318
Page: 42 of 78 12/8/ 8:09:36 AM
ROBERTBARTON
CORYBLAKEMIHOLIC
H
PERRIMELNICK
Total Votes
98 64
168
20 11
27 58
Page: 43 of 78
City of Big Bear Lake Member, City Council District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:4 of 4 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 394
Undervotes 64
Overvotes O
Candidate Party MailBallot
Mail Ballot
0 0
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
O
O
0 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
72 13
1 Polling Place
Polling Place
Provisional
3 1
0 Provisional
O
2 O
2 Provisional
Total
469 / 663
78 1
70.74%
Total
118
77 195
390
Total
163
201
781
CURTIS BURTON
SYLVIA(CERVANTEZ)
.OROZCO
GREGORYMARQUE
Z
Votes
48.61%
26.85%;
24.54%§
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
5,943 O
634 O
0 Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
2,533 0
1,466 0
1,289 0
5,288 0
MailBallot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
904
120
3 Polling Place
Polling Place
Provisional
17 7,
0 Provisional
Provisional
Total
6,864/ 13,965 49.15%;
761
24 Total
2,955
1,632
1,492
6,079
Total
City of Chino Member, City Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
Unresolved Write-In
Total
417
30.26 %: 19.74%
50.00 UnresolvedWrite—|n
330
12/8/2022 8:09:36AM
AABIRBUSHAR
A
LARRYWU
-MARCA. LUCIO
Total Votes
City of Chino Member, City Council District 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,814 0 595 16 4,425 / 11,299
Undervotes 559 0 108 8 675
Overvotes 4 O 0 0 4
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
833 0 134 3 970
0. 76 659
1,836 277 4
3,251 O 487 8 3,746
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite—|n 0 0 O 0 0
City of Chino Hills Member, City Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 9 of 9 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 4,676 0 545 5,243 / 9,724
Undervotes 654 0 76 8 738
Overvotes 8 O 0 10
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
RAYMARQUEZ 2,935 0 346 9 3,290
JASON ZHANG 376 O 42 420
EDDIEWONG 336 O 36 1 373
WAIMIN (NORMAN) LIU 358 O 43 2 403
Total Votes 4,014 O 467 14 4,495
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
9 0 0 O
39.16%.
25.89%
17.59%,
56.51%;
53.92%
73.19%
9,34
%8.30
%8.97%
ELIZABETHGARCIA 0.20%
MCDOUGALL
Unresolved Write-In
WR|TE—|N
22 2,117
S82
12/8/20228:09:36 A Page: 44 of 78
I
I -- II- -
— - I
I
' -
I I I
u
I
I I I
u
' I
2 1 1-—
PETERJ. ROGERS
Total Votes
Page: 45 of 78
City of Chino Hills Member, City Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:9 of 9 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
4,570 0
1,217
0 Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 E353 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
501
157
1 Polling Place
Polling Place
Provisional
Z2
10 0
Provisional
Provisional
Total
5,093 / 9,473
1,384
1 Total
3,708 100.00%
;
3,708
Total
53.76 %:
DIEGOFERNANDE
Z
BRIANJOHSZ
Total Votes
City of Chino Hills Member, City Council District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 14 of 14 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 3,537 0
Undervotes 469 O
Overvotes 2 O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
O
O
0 MailBallot Designated
MailBallot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0
City of Colton Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 51 of 51 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 6,906 0
Undervotes 665 O
Overvotes 3 O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
FRANKJ. NAVARRO 0
MARKL.GARCIA 0
Total Votes 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 0
Polling Place
491
61 0
Polling Place
183
430
Polling Place
Polling Place
1,148
151
0 Polling Place
640
997
PollingPlace
Provisional
24 7
0 Provisional
Provisional
Provisional
42 11
O
Provisional
15 16
31 Provisional
Total
4,052 / 8,831
537
2 Total
1.283
2,230
3,513
Total
Total
8,096 / 25,748
827
3 Total
5.034
2,232
7,266
Total
45.88%
36.52%
63.48%
31.44%’
69.28%
30.72%
4,379
1,859
6,238
UnresolvedWrite—
357
1,092
1,974
3,066
247
12 12
343
343
UnresolvedWrite—|n
3,353
12/8/20228:09:36 AM
—__._- __ i..._;.__;__;_.:1'_'.._:'.::.'
_
City of Colton Member, City Council District 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 8 of 8 (100.00%)
Page: 46 of 78
City of Colton Member, City Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,773 O 249 3 2,025 / 6,659 30.41%
Undervotes 319 O 48 3 370
Overvotes O O 0 O O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
DAVIDJ. TORO 1,454 0 201 0 1,655 100.00
%;
Total Votes 1,454 0 201 0 1,655
1 Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 O 0
City of Colton Member, City Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 1‘ of 11 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,508 0 255 14 1,777/6,355 27.
96%
:
Undervotes 135 0 26 3 164
Overvotes 1 O 0 O 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total MailBallot
KELLYJ. CHASTAIN 817 0 130 5 952
KENNETHJ. KOPERSKI 555 0 99 6 660
Total Votes 1,372 O 229 11 1,612
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 O O O
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
ISAACT. SUCHIL
LUISs.GONZALEZ
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
1,577 O
119 0
3 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O
938’ O
. 1'45? 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
288
24 0
PollingPlace
95 169
264
PollingPlace
Provisional
9 2
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
1,874 / 6,077 30.84
%: 145
3 Total
617 35.75%.
1,109 64.25
%; 1,726
Total
Unresolved Write—
517
59.06%
40.94%
Unresolved Write—|n
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Page: 47 of 78
City of Colton Member, City Council District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 14 of 14 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 2,048 0 356 16 2,420 / 6,657 36.
Undervotes 236 0 52 4 292 35%
:Overvc”>_t_e_s
H 4 0 O O 4
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total MailBallot
JOHN R. ECHEVARRIA 1,079 O 178 7 1,264 59.51%
GEM MONTES 422 O 68 2 492 23.16
%; ROBERTD.WILSON 307 0 58 3 368 17.33
%;
Total Votes 1,808 0 304 12 2,124
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 0 O
32 41
62 SHANNON O'BRIEN
JESUS"JESSE"SANDOVA
L
ACQUANETFAWARREN
Total Votes
Unresolved Write-In
City of Fontana Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 101 of 101 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
32,033
1,932
29 MailBallot
7,016
9,010
14,046
30,072
MailBallot
O
O
Designated
MailBallot
0 2
Designated
MailBallot
0 Polling Place
4,822
358
Polling Place
969
1,274
2,220
4,463
Polling Place
Provisional
176
41 O
Provisional
135
Provisional
Total
37,033 / 109,109
2,331
30 Total
8,017
10,325
16,330
3‘."§Z.2......
. Total
33.94%
23.12 %; 29.78%
:47.10%
Unresolved Write—|n
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
PHILLIPW. COTHRAN
RICARDOQUINTANA
TALFRED ‘AL’GONZALE
S
Total Votes
Page: 48 of 78
City of Fontana Member, City Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:24 of 24 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 11,176 0 1,555 53 12,784 / 31,062 41.16%
Undervotes 1,306 0 226 14 1,546
Overvotes 8 0 1 O
H 9
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
6,309 O 807 15 7,131 63.51%
1,105 0 133 9 1,247 11.11%.
2,448 0 388 15 2,851 25.39%
9,862 0 1,328 39 11,229
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
JOHN B.ROBERT
S
BRIANKOLDE
Total Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
5,868 0
672 O
0 Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O
O
0 Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 0
Polling Place
874
103
0 Polling Place
539
232
771
Polling Place
Provisional
30 11
O
Provisional
‘l1
8 19
Provisional
Total
6,772 / 22,967 29.
49%
;
786
2 Total
4,325 72.28%’
1,659 27.72%‘
5,984
Total
City of Fontana Member, City Council District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 22 of 22 (100.00%)
1,419
5,
UnresolvedWrite—|n
3,775
Unresolved Write—
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
577
774
GABRlELSANCHEZ
JANET KOEHLERBROOKS
Total Votes
Page: 49 of 78
City of Fontana City Clerk (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:101 of 101 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
ALEXANDRAC. RIVERA
ELIZABETH"LIZ"SENA
ALYSSAFLORES
GERMAINEKEY
Total Votes
Unresolved Write-In
Mail Ballot Designated M
32,033 2
4,278 0
26 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
3,058 0
5,327 1
4,932 0
14,412 1
27,729
MailBallot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
4,822
718
8 PollingPlace
Polling Place
City of Fontana City Treasurer (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 101 of 101 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
32,033
4,046 O
6 0
Mail Ballot Designated»
Mail Ballot
8,504 0
19,477 2
27,981 2.
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
4,822
658
1 Polling Place
Polling Place
Provisional
176
54 O
Provisional
21 24
34 43
122
Provisional
Provisional
176
51 0
Provisional
58 67
125
Provisional
Total
37,033 / 109,109 33.94%
5,050
34 Total
3,656 11.44%.
6,126 19.17
%’ 6,011 18.
16,156 81% 50.57%
‘ 31,949
Total
Total
37,033 / 109,109 33.
4,755 94%
7 Total
10,216 31.66
22,055 %: 68.34
%‘
32,271
Total
DARCYMCNABOE
WILLIAM"BILL"HUSSE
Y
Total Votes
163
326
489
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3,322 O
214 O
2 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
1,529’ 0
1,577 0
3,106 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
PollingPlace
537
48 0
Polling Place
PollingPlace
Provisional
15 3
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
3,874 / 7,853 49.33%
265
Total
1,597 47.05
%‘ 1,910 52.
95%
:
3.607
Total
City of Grand Terrace Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
UnresolvedWrite—|n
1,654
2,509
4,163
UnresolvedWrite—|n
1,045
1,700
4,096
12/8/20228:09:36AM
j.jj_I.::
DOUG A.WILSO
N
Total Votes
352
352
10 10
City of Montclair Member, City Council (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
3,072
1,680
4,752
JAVIER "JOHN" DUTRE
Y
OSCAR MIRANDA
Total Votes
Page: 50 of 78
City of Grand Terrace Member, City Council (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:7 of 7 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,322 O 537 15 3,874 / 7,853 49.33%
Undervotes 990 0 185 5 1,180
Overvotes O 0 O 0 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
0 2,694 100.00
%’
0 72,694
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 O O 0
City of Montclair Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 5,232 0 813 40 6,085 / 17,895 34.00%
Undervotes 477 0 93 14 584
Overvotes 3 0 O S
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
0 406 3,493 63.56
%; 0 2,003 36.
44%
?
0 26 5,496
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O O 0 0
3,771
18 Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
BILLRUH
JULIETOROZCO
CORYSAMARTINEZ
XAVIERMENDEZ
Total Votes
Party
5,232
3,166
18 Mail Ballot
2,087
1,443
2,197
1,553
Mail Ballot
7.z.?‘.3.‘?. .. ..
O 813
O 563
0 O
Designated PollingPlace
Mall Ballot
0 282
0 236
0 261
o 284
0 ....lr9§:3
Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
O 0
Provisional
14 10
38 Provisional
Total
2,376
1,686
1,847
8,381
Total
28.35%
20.12%
29.50%
22.04 %
40 42
6,085 / 17,895 34.00%’
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Unresolved Write»|n
2,472
15 312 11
718
Unresolved Write—
2,332
2,332
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
44 316
413
773
21 O0
142
263
Page: 51 of 78
City of Needles Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:1 of1 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 804 O 278 9
Undervotes 31 0 14 2
Overvotes 0 O 1 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional MailBallot
ESANDRAQUEENNOBLE 0 2
JAMES M.JONES 0 1
JANETJERNIGAN 0 4
Total Votes 0 7
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n O O 0 0
City of Needles Member, City Council (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported: 1 of 1 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 804 0 278 9
Undervotes 1,309 0 439 14
Overvotes O 0 0 O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Mail Ballot
JOANNE POGUE 340 O 113 4
JAMIE N. MCCORKLE 499 O 179 4
HENRYLONGBRAKE 264 O 103 5
Total Votes 1,103 O 395 13
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
Total
1,091 /2,105
47 Total
67 417
559
1,043
Total
Total
1,091 / 2,105
1,762
0 Total
457
682
372
1,511
Total
51.83%=
6.42 39.98 %;
%; 53.
60%
51.83%
30. 24%
;
45.14 %§ 24.62%
Unresolved Write—|n
12/8/2022 8:09:36AM
0000000
470
688
1,514
391
1,512
1,082
5,657
Page: 52 of 78
City of Ontario Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 110 of 110 (100.00%)
Times Cast
'Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
RUBENVALENCIA
PAUL S. LEON
CHRISTIANGARCIA
Total Votes
UnresolvedWrite-In
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
27,564 1
2,181 1
34 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
8,834 0
13,592 0
2,923 O
....?.5v.3..49.. 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
4,037
360
Polling Place
1,231
1,935
504
3,670
PollingPlace
Provisional
207-
53 0
Provisional
64 56
34 154
Provisional
City of Ontario Member, City Council (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 110 of 110 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
MICHAELDUENAS
AARON BRATTON
JIM W. BOWMAN
NORBERTOCORONA
ALAND. WAPNER
CELINALOPEZ
Total Votes
UnresolvedWrite—|n
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
27,564 1
13,959 2
146 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
3,776
5,448
9,996
2,329
10,884
8,590
41,023
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 0
Polling Place
4,037
2,393
24 Polling Place
PollingPlace
Provisional
207
167
0 Provisional
37 36
52 19
42 61
247
Provisional
Total
31,809 / 87,019
2,595
41 Total
10,129
15,583
3,461
29,173
Total
Total
31,809 / 87,019
16,521
170
Total
4,283
6,172
11,562
2,739
12,438
9,733
46,927
Total
35.55%;
34.72%
53.42%
11.86%;
36.55%
9.13 13.15% %‘;
24.64 %‘ 5.84%
26.50 %; 20.74%
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
Unresolved Write—|n
City of Rancho Cucamonga Member, City Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 44 of 44 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 14,633 0 2,635 66 17,334 / 31,320 55.34%
Undervotes 2,255 0 447 27 2,729
Overvotes 30 0 4 O 34
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
FLOYDE.CLARK 2,934 O 548 14 3,496 23.
99%
;
ROSESTEPHENSOLMSTED 300 0 42 0 342 2.
35 %:
ASHLEYSTICKLER 4,109 O 905 8 5,022 34.
47%
:
MARYHANNAH 1,210 0 155 8 1,373 9.
42 %: LAWRENCEHENDERSON 1,598 0 205 3 1,806 12.39%
ERICKJIMENEZ 2,197 0 329 6 2,532 17.38%
Total Votes 12,348 0 2,184 39 14,571
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-ln O 0 0 0 0
City of Rancho Cucamonga Member, City Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 58 of 58 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 7,574 0 1,135 44 8,753 / 21,897 39.97%
Undervotes 1,068 0 193 16 1,277
Overvotes 9 O O 0 9
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
"DAVIDVANGORDEN 1,953 0 356 8 2,317
JOANNE NURSALL 823 0 160 987
-KRISTINESCOTT 3,721 0 426 16 4,163
Total Votes 6,497’ O 942 28 7,467
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O O 0 0
31.03%
13.22%
55. 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM Page: 53 of 78
1,705
717
257
315
Page: 54 of 78
City of Redlands Member, City Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:21 of 21 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,390 5 548 30 3,973 / 7,639 5201%
Undervotes 394 62 7 463
Overvotes O 0 2
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
DENISEDAVIS 1 157 12 1,875 53.
45 %?
TOM BERG 0 214 6 937 26.71
%‘
RODGIRCOHEN 2 56 2 317 9.04%‘
ANDREWHODER 2 59 3 379 10.80%
Total Votes 2,994 5 486 23 3,508
MailBallot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O O O 0
City of Redlands Member, City Council District 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:23 of 23 (100.00%)
PAUL T. BARIC
H
Total Votes
RICHARDO'DONNELL WRlTE—|N
Unresolved Write«ln
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
89 O
626
639
21 24
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
MIKESAlF|E
MARIOJACOBSAUCEDO
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—In
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
3,852- 4 659
463 O 87
1 O 0
MailBallot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
1,350 0
2,038 4
3,388 4
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
0 O O
Provisional
29 5
0 Provisional
9 15
24 Provisional
Total
4,544 / 8,899
555
1 Total
1,692
2,296
3,988
Total
City of Redlands Member, City Council District 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place
6,882 0 959
g2,‘(_JE_37 o 320
0 0 0
MailBallot Designated Polling Place
Mall Ballot
Provisional
32 8
O
Provisional
Total
7,873 / 11,591
2,415
0 Total
5,353
-'.’.".l_5.3 ... Total
105
51.06%
42.43 %57.57%;
67.92%
1.92%
4,706
4,795
98.08 333
239
572
Unresolved Write—|n
12/8/20228:09:36 AM
29 20
21 City of Rialto Member, City Council (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported:78 of 78 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
JOE BACA
KARLAPEREZ
KELLYERVING
EDSCOTT
ANDREWSEYFRIED
Total Votes
Pa rty
Mail Ballot Designated M
13,717
7,140
96 Mail Ballot
6,408
4,013
2,886
5,588
1,303
20,198
MailBallot
3 3
O
Designated
MailBallot
3 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
2,057
1,288
12 Polling Place
826
523
393
816
256
2,814
Polling Place
Provisional
67 47
O
Provisional
87 Provisional
Total
15,844 / 52,081
8,478
108
Total
7,265
4,556
3,288
6,425
1,568
23,102
Total
30.42%
31.45%;
19.72 %. 14.23%;
27.81%
6.79%.
UnresolvedWrite-In
City of San Bernardino Mayor (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:237 of 237 (100.00%)
DANIELL.MINTZSR
Total Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
7 Candidate Party
518
115
Mail Ballot
MailBallot
93 24
Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
O
Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
0' 0
Provisional
Provisional
Total
480
480
Total
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 25,131 0 3,551 160 28,842 / 101,094 28.53%‘
Undervotes 1,618 0 299 33 1,950
Overvotes 19 O 1 1 21
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
JAMES F. "JIM" PENMAN 8,448 0 1,506 48 10,002 37.
HELENTRAN 15,046 0 1,745 78 16,869 22% 62.78%
Total Votes 23,494 0 3,251 126 26,871
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
MailBallot
Unresolved Write-ln 0 O O O 0
City of Twentynine Palms Member, City Council District 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:8 of 8 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total 0 10 621 / 1,734 35.81%
0 2 141
5 0 0
69 8
69 403
403
Unresolved Write-In
100.00
12/8/2022 8:09:36 A
Page: 55 of 78
KARMOLETFEO‘G|LV|E
OCTAVIOUS SCOT|'
Total Votes
Page: 56 of 78
City of Twentynine Palms Member, City Council District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 9 of 9 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 573
Undervotes 61
Overvotes O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
Mail Ballot
O
0 O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 O
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
112
19 0
Polling Place
40 53
93 PollingPlace
Provisional
10 1
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
695/ 1,616
81 0
Total
303 49.35%
311 50.65%
614
Total
43.01 %:
City of Twentynine Palms Member, City Council District 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 399 O 88 14 S01 / 1,242 40.34
%; Undervotes 106 0 28 3 137
Overvotes O O O 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
MCARTHURWRIGHT 60 11 364 100.
000/av Total Votes 60 11 364
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
MailBallot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 O 0 0
City of Upland Member, City Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:27 of 27 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 7,034 0 1,084 42 8,160 / 14,392 56.70
%‘
Undervotes 934 O 154 12 1,100
Overvotes 5 O 0 O 5
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
JAMES BRElTL|NG O 18 3,799 53.85
% JANICEELLIOTT 0 12 3,256 46.15
%‘
Total Votes 0 30 7,055
4 Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
622
308
930
3,159
2,936
6,095
Unresolved Write—|n
293
293
258
254
512
Unresolved Write-In
12/8/20228:09:36 AM
DARWINCRUZ
CHRISTOPHERSEWARD
RUDYA.ZUNIGA
Total Votes
Page: 57 of 78
City of Upland Member, City Council District 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 11 of 11 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 2,760 0 457 45 3,262 / 8,778 37.16%
Undervotes 766 0 149 17 932
Overvotes 0 0 0 0 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
CARLOSA. GARCIA 1,994 0 2,330 100.
00%: Total Votes 1,994 0 2,330
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 O 0
City of Upland Member, City Council District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,149 O 565 20 3,734/9,382 39.80%
Undervotes 390 0 79 3 472
Overvotes 3 O 0 0 3
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
616 0 98 8 722 22.15%.
472 0 115 3 590 18.
10 %
1,668 0 6 1,947 59.74%
2,756 0 486 7 3,2597
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0 0 O 0
City of Victorville Member, City Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,806 0 644 24 4,474 / 14,769 30.29
%; Undervotes 514 0 85 11 610
Overvotes 1 0 0 0 1
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
RAFAELPORRAS 1,035 0 241 1,280 33.13%
DEBRAJONES 2,256 0 318 9 2,583 66.
87 %.
Total Votes 3,291 0 559 13 H
I
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0 0 0
273
28 28
308
308
12/8/20228:09:36 AM
LIZETANGULO
ROBERT“BOB" HARRIMA
N
Total Votes
1,755
1,801
3,556
Page: 58 of 78
City of Victorville Member, City Council District 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
"TimesCast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
4,090 0
530 0
4 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
0 Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
535
68 0
Polling Place
178
289
467
Polling Place
Provisional
21 10
0 Provisional
11 Provisional
Total
4,646 / 13,701
608
4 33.91%
Total
1,938 43.04%;
2,096 51.96
%‘ 4,034
Total
526
466
1,074
1,076
3,142
71 93
211
268
643
City of Yucaipa Member, City Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,424 5 693 15 4,137 / 7,234 57.19%
Unden/otes
V 276 O 47 3 326
Overvotes 6 O 3 0 9
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
MARKL.TAYLOR 0 1 598 15.
73%
:
ERIKV. SAHAKIAN 0 1 560 14.73%
SHERILYNLONG 1 5 1,291 33.96%
MATTGARNER 4 5 1,353 35.59%.
Total Votes 5 12 3,802
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 O O
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
‘NENA R. DRAGOO
VCHRISVENABLE
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
2.937 4
395
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
946
1,596
2,542
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
510
78 1
Polling Place
181
250
431'
PollingPlace
Provisional
13 Provisional
Provisional
Total
3,464_/5,ss__4_50.
32%
?
478
1 Total
1,131 37.89%;
1,854 62.
11%: 2,985
Total
City of Yucaipa Member, City Council District 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Unresolved Write-In
Unresolved Write—|n
12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
JIM SCHOOLE
R
Total Votes
Town of Yucca Valley Member, Town Council District 1 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:7 of 7 (100.00%)
Town of Yucca Valley Member, Town Council District 5 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total -Times Cast 1,000 141 8 1,149 / 2,422 47.44%
Unden/otes 275 46 6 327
Overvotes O O O 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
822
2 822
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 O 0 0 0
Town of Yucca Valley Member, Town Council District 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 2‘ of 2‘ (‘00.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,331 26 186 5 1,548 / 2.738 56.54
Undervotes 386 1 52 1 440 %:
Overvotes 0 O 0 0 O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
MERLR.ABEL 945 25 134 4 1,108 100.00
%; Total Votes 945 134 4 1,108
:
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O 0 . O 0
RICKDENISO
N
Total Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
1,078
325
0 Mail Ballot
Mail Ballot
O
0 O
Designated
Mail Ballot
O
O
Designated
MailBallot
0 Polling Place
166
S8
0 PollingPlace
Polling Place
Provisional
10 4
0 Provisional
6 6
Provisional
Total
1,254 / 2,479 50.58%
387
0 Total
867
867
Total
753
753
108
108
Unresolved Write-In
100.00%
Unresolved Write-In
25 725
725
10o.0o
Page: 59 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
1,217
2,627
2,838
1,011
7,693
STEVENA. PERRY
CHARLESHICKSJR
MARIKAYLINDSTRO
M
ALANLEE
Total Votes
Big Bear Airport District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported:94 of 94 (100.00%)
20 23
18 14.04
40.35% %
;14.04
%‘ 31.58%
DALEALANOKUNO
DAVlD JOHN PALACIOS
GERARDLEON NOONA
N
JAMIE L.STYPINSKI
Total Votes 00000
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
30 35
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place
Mall Ballot
Provisional Total
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 5,485 2
Undervotes 3,255 3
Overvotes 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 0
O
1 1
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—ln 0
Polling Place
961
S95
4 Polling Place
244
462
457
160
1,323
Polling Place
Provisional
72 68
O
Provisional
22 21
25 8
76 Provisional
Total
6,520 / 10,904
3,921
26 59.79%
Total
1,483 16.31%
; 3,110 34.20%
3,320 36.51
%? 1,180 12.9a
%§ 9,093
Total
Yucca Valley Airport District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported:1 of1 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
3 4
O
Provisional Total
33/60
39 3
55.00%
Unresolved Write—|n OOQQO
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
MailBallot
O O O 0
52 57
22 Page: 60 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
-_. 1
._L -_--_.
213
309
318
1,165
‘
IO
13 ANNETTEM. ROPER
BILLYBURKROSENBER
G
GEORGECARDENAS
RON J. CLARK
CRAIGJ. SCHNEIDER
Total Votes
Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
Page: 61 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 A
M
Big Bear City Community Services District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported:41 of41 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,518 O 658 25 4,201 / 7,488 56.10%
Undervotes 4,307 0 806 34 5,147
Overvotes O O 3 O 3
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
LYLEH. DEVORESR 1,231 0 1,454 19.51%E
BOBROWE 1,676 0 1,998 26.81%:
ALZIEGLER 1,602 0 1,934 25.95%
JOHN GREEN 1,738 0 2,067 27.73%
Total Votes 6,247 0 41
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 O 0 O
Helendale Community Services District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 3)
Unresolved Write—|n
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
1,568
1,743 ’
0 Mail Ballot
740
493
604
611
513
2,961
Mail Ballot
34 43
O
Designated
MailBallot
14 1
12 15
7 59
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
449
519
0 Polling Place
225
152
148
167
136
828
PollingPlace
Provisional
14 24
O
Provisional
UJLAJU‘IU~JJ>-UU
1 Provisional
Total
2,065 / 3,918
2,329
0 Total
982
660
767
798
659
3,866
Total
52.71%
25.40%
17.07%
19.84%
20. 64%
;
17.05 %?
7,453
11 325
52 256
Page: 62 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 A
M
Newberry Community Services District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported:5 of 5 (100.00%)
Unresolved Write-In
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 410 O 144 4 558 / 1,105 50.50%
Undervotes 489 0 176 6 671
Overvotes O 0 0 O O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
JACK UNGER 217 O 71 2 290
ROBERTM. SPRlNGER 170 O 70 1 241
gg/IRICHAEL DEVANMATSON 195 O 63 260
‘JUAN MANUELFIGUEROA 159 O 1 212
Total Votes 741 O 6
7 7 1,003
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O 0 0 0
Phelan Pinon Hills Community Services District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 4,676 0 978 38 5,692 / 12,262 46.42%;
Undervotes 6,967 0 1,513 64 8,544
Overvotes 9 0 3 0 12
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
DEBORAHJ. PHILIPS 1,208 O 8 1,442
GREGSNYDER 2,016 O 15 2,422
CHARLES"CHUCK"HAYS 1,429 O 9 1,765
KATHYANN HOFFMAN 2,399 0 18 2,891
Total Votes 0 1,418 50 8,520
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 O O O O
16.92%
28.43%
20.72%
33. 391
327
474
226
28.91%
24.03%
25.92%
21.14%
’
Yermo Community Services District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
SETHBURT
CRAIGCARPENTER
PAUL ANDREWMILLER
WILLIAMERlCHEWLETF
WILLIAMKING
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
227
147
0 MailBallot
0 48
O 26
O O
Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
Provisional
3 3
O
Provisional
Total
278/ 519
176
0 Total
121
69 155
26 9
53.56%
;
31.84%;
18.16 %‘ 40.79%
6.84%.
2.37 %.:
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total .Times Cast 252 15 75 344 / 750 45.87%?
Undervotes 345 24 119 0' 488
Overvotes 3 O O O 3
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
GERALDE.YEARSLEY 85 2 15 2 104 19.22%
KIMBERLYD. EVANS 135 10 38 185 34.20%:
RICKYGENELOEHR 71 25 99 18.30%?
CLARlSSAJ. LOEHR 117 28 153 28.28%
Total Votes 408 106 6 541
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O O 0 0 0
Arrowbear Park County Water District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported:2 of 2 (100.00%)
UnresolvedWrite—
00 S7
124
18 8
307
MailBallot
OCDOOOC
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 21
11 30
7 1
70 DollingPlace Drovisional
380
Total
Page: 63 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
CAROLINAVERDUZC
O
DARRENLUTER
DAN JENKINS
Total Votes
Page: 64 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 AM
West Valley Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:29 of 29 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,763 24 621 16 4,424 / 11,292 39.18%,
Undervotes 648 2 145 4 799 ’
Overvotes 8 O 1 0 9
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
503 3 71
1,053 258 1,323
1,551 12 146 1,714
3,107 22 475 3,616
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n O 0 O 0
West Valley Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 3,007 0 471 11 3,489/9,939 35.10%
Undervotes 430 0 58 3 491
Overvotes 0 0 1 O 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
KENBOSHART 986 O 203 2 1,191
KELVINMOORE 1,591 O 209 6 1,806
Total Votes 0 412 8 2,997
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n 0 0 O O O
Chino Valley Independent Fire District Member, Board of Directors Division 3 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 36 of 36 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 7,381 0 1,107 43 8,531 / 19,120 44.62%
Undervotes 1,325 0 215 16 1,556
Overvotes 4 0 2 0 6
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
TOM HAUGHEY 3,183 O 496 11 3,690 52.95%;
WINN WILLIAMS 2,869 0 394 16 3,279 47.05%‘
Total votes 99.5.2 0 890 27 6-969... , , Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite—|n 0 O O 0 0
_2.
39. 60.26%
16. 01%
‘
36.59%
47.40%
579
305
Page: 65 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Bear Valley Community Healthcare District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 2)
Precincts Reported: 94 of 94 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 5,485 961 72 6,520 / 10,904 59.79%?
Undervotes 4,125 3 812 72 5,012
Overvotes 0 2 0 8
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total MailBallot
"JOHN"JACK"BRINER 2,613 430 27 3,071 38.29%;
PETERS. BOSS 3,147 512 35 3,694 46.06%?
NANCYSARGENT 1,079 166 10 1,255 15.65%
Total Votes 6,839 1,108 8,020
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
MailBallot
Unresolved Write—ln 0 0 O O 0
Big Bear Municipal Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 3 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,021 0 157 15 1,193/1,919 62.17%:
Undervotes 0 30 10 263
Overvotes 18 0 3 O 21
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
CRAIGBREWSTER 355 0 58 414 45.54%
BRIAN BOYD 131 0 20 152 16.72%~
MICHAELJ. LOGRANDE 240 O 41 284 31.24%;
GREGORYA. KAMMERMAN 54 0 5 59 6.49%
Total Votes 780 0 124 909
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
MailBallot
0 0 O 0 Unresolved Write-In
223
72
"E-4: I1. _.'._.__..-
Page: 66 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Inland Empire Utilities Agency Member, Board of Directors Division 3 (Vote for 1)
222
Precincts Reported:126 of 126 (100.00%)
812
2,267
T MILFORD HARRISO
N
LELANDLUBINSKY
ROYGEORGE
Total Votes
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 40,377
. Undervotes 8.869
Overvotes 13
Candidate Party Marl Ballot
‘STEVEELlE
WINN WILLIAMS
Total Votes
MailBallot
UnresolvedWrite-In
0 0
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
5,548
1,216
Polling Place
Polling Place
0 Provisional
78 0
Provisional
81 63
144
Provisional
0 Total
46,147 / 96,732
10,163
15 Total
23,332
12,637
35,969
Total
0 47.71%
64.87%,
35.13%;
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 3 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 163 of 163 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M
Times Cast 19,049
Undervotes 3,001
Overvotes 16
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
TRESSYL.CAPPS 2,218
JESUS MEDINA 5,754
SUSAN LONGVILLE 8,060
Total Votes 16,032
MailBallot
UnresolvedWrite—|n O
61 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
9 10
21 40
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
2.829
560
Polling Place
Polling Place
0 Provisional
139
38 Provisional
24 60
17 101
Provisional
0 Total
22,078 / 70.886
2,721
6,809
8,910
18,440
Total
0 31.15%
14.76%;
36.93%‘
48.32%
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 156 of 156 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M
Times Cast 33,094
Undervotes 7,301
' Overvotes 27
Candidate Party MailBallot
20,448
2,937
2,381
25,766
MailBallot
55 21
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
3 4
34 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
5,115
1.251
8 Polling Place
2,694
511
651
3,856
Polling Place
Provisional
238
72 O
Provisional
119
22 25
166
Provisional
Total
38,502 / 79,517
8,645
35 Total
23,288
3,473
3.061
29,822
Total
48.42%:
78.09%
11.65%
10.26%
Unresolved Write-In
27 985
470
21 2,028
4,330
20,949
10,546
31,495
2.
STEVEBORDERS
JAMESWALTERROBERTSIll
Total Votes
19 26
45 JEANETTEHAYHURS
T
RON HAEFELE
Total Votes
Page: 67 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Hesperia Recreation And Park District Member, Board of Directors Division 5 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:52 of 52 (100.00°/o)
Times Cast
Undervotes
- Overvotes
Candidate
Unresolved Write—|n
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3,281 61
620 14
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
MailBallot Designated
MailBallot
0 0
Polling Place
589
122
1 Polling Place
466
Polling Place
Provisional
20 Provisional
15 Provisional
3,951 / 11,205
Total
35.26%:
761
1 Total
1,352 42.40%:
1,337 57.60%
3,189
Total
Mojave Water Agency Member. Board of Directors Division 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported:42 of42 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
ROBERTRODRIGUEZ
MIKEPAGE
«Total Votes
Unresolved Write—|n
Party
MailBallot Designated M
9,475 0
1,520 0
5 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 O
0 Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
0 0
Polling Place
1,508
313
0 Polling Place
471
724
1,195
Polling Place
Provisional
68 23
0 Provisional
Provisional
1,051 / 31,895
Total
34.65%
1,856
5 Total
3,117
6,073
9,190
Total
Mojave Water Agency Member, Board of Directors Division 6 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 212 of 212 (100.00
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
%)
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
8,930 476
1,281 66
0 Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
278
132
410
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
1,952
296
1 PollingPlace
958
697
1,655
Polling Place
Provisional
60 14
O
Provisional
31 15
46 Provisional
11,418 / 32,937
Total
34.67%
1,657
8 Total
6,835 70.03%
2,918 29.92%;
9,753
Total
5,568
2,074
7,642
UnresolvedWrite—|n
33.92%’
66.08 2,627
5,323
7,950
234
232
23 24
47 1,089
1,572
2,661
Page: 68 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36A
M
Chino Basin Water Conservation District Member, Board of Directors Division 1 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:37 of 37 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
’ Ove Notes
Candidate
KATlPARKER
TERRYKING
Total Votes
Unresolved Write-In
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
14,015 0
2,812 0
6 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 O
0 Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
2,222
485
1 Polling Place
Polling Place
0 Provisional
116
41 0
Provisional
52 Provisional
0 Total
16,353 / 36,582
3,338
Total
7,992
5,016
13,008
Total
0 44.70%:
61.44%
38.56%
Cucamonga Valley Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 4 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 24 of 24 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Unden/otes
Overvotes
Candidate
JIM MOFFATT
STEVENLACEY
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—|n
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
9,116 0
2,149 O
3 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
3,718
3,246
6,964
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
PollingPlace
1,516
372
0 Polling Place
1,144
Polling Place
Provisional
46 19
0 Provisional
15 12
27 Provisional
Total
10,6_78_/ 22,716
2.540
3 Total
4,280
3,855
8.135
Total
East Valley Water District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported: 142 of 142 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
DANIELCARREON
RONALD L.(RON) COATS
JAMES MORALESJR
PHILLIPR.GOODRICH
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
16,064 9
20,210 18
60 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
6,162 1
6,895 2
7,857 3
7,008 3
27,922 9
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
2,51 1
3,745
6 PollingPlace
967
882
997
936
3,782
Polling Place
Provisional
84 110
0 Provisional
39 31
38 34
142
Provisional
Total
18,668 / 53,291
24,083
66 Total
7,169
7,810
8,895
7,981
31,855
Total
47.01%?
52.61%
47.39%,
35.03%?
22.51%
24.52%?
27.92%
25.05%
Unresolved Write-In
547
597
1,151
585
1,736
6,789
4,408
11,197
'-;J—:_';f;-- :——uj j-—u-u-—-
- :-
I
Page: 69 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36AM
Hi-Desert Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 3 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 1,173 0 229 6 1,408 / 2,872 49.03%
Undervotes 188 0 S2 2 242
Overvotes 0 O 1 O 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
KENNETHNYQUISTSR 288 0 SO 1 339 29.10%;
ROGERD. MAYES 697 26 3 826 70.90%
Total Votes 985 O 176 4 1,165
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite-In O 0 O 0 0
Joshua Basin Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 1 (Vote for 1)
DOUGLASBUCKBUCKLE
Y
TYLER"THOMAS"SHORT
Total Votes
Precincts Reported:7 of 7 (100.00%)
1,720
1,625
930
1,448
ROBERTW. COGH|LL JR
ANITA(SUZI) HORN
TEDWRIGHT
RAN DYSTEPHEN LEAZE
R
Total Votes
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 442 52 4 500/ 951 52.58%‘
Undervotes 84 14 2 100
H
Overvotes O O O 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total Mail Ballot
150 19 1 172 43.00%
208 O 19 228 57.00%
358 33 400
'
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In O O 0 O 0
Twentynine Palms Water District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 3) Precincts Reported:43 of 43 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 2,911 O 586 34 3,531 /8,050 43.86
Undervotes 2,986 0 731 %:: 36 3,753
1 Overvotes 24 0 O 0 24
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
O 328 18 2,066 30.31%
0 273 22 1,920 28.17%
0 191 10 1,131 16.59%;
0 235 16 1,699 24.93
%; 0 ,027 66 6,816
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
O 0 0 0 0 Unresolved Write—|n
5.
NYLESMATIASOHARRA
KENNETHPAUL MUNOZ S
R
Total Votes
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
3,140
602
0 Mail Ballot
2 2
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
Polling Place
548
139
0 Polling Place
286
123
409
Provisional
10 Provisional
Total
3,700/7,556 48.97
%; 745
0 Total
Page: 70 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36AM
Yucaipa Valley Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 2 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
BASSAM MARKALZAMMAR
EJAYS. BOGH
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
5,721 85
966 22
2 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
819 6
3,934 57
4,753 63
Polling Place
1,070
164
0 Polling Place
93 813
906
Provisional
20 8
O
Provisional
Total
6,896/ 11,172
1,160
Tota I
61.73 %:
1,751 2,041 69.07%
787 914 30.93%
2,538 8 2,955
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write»|n 0 O O O O
Yucaipa Valley Water District Member, Board of Directors Division 3 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:21 of 21 (100.00%)
KENNETHC. NELSEN
MICKHILL
NIK| RENEWIESSNE
R
Total Votes
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place Provisional
920
4,814
5,734
Total
16.04%
83.96 %’
Crestline Sanitation District Member, Board of Directors (Vote for 2) Precincts Reported: 44 of 44 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 2,857
Undervotes 2,382
Overvotes 4
Candidate Party MailBallot
1,233
1,016
1,079
3,328
Mail Ballot
34 20
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
24 4
20 48
Designated
MailBallot
0 Polling Place
693
624
0 Polling Place
262
254
246
762
Polling Place
Provisional
34 34
0 Provisional
13 13
8 34
Provisional
Total
3,618 / 6,822
3,060
4 Total
1,532
1,287
1,353
4'17?
Total
53.03%
36.72 %? 30.85%
32.43%
Unresolved Write—
12
Page: 71 of 78
San Bernardino County PROPOSITION 1 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 390,240 2,140 63,909 2,538
Undervotes 14,550 86 2,483 120
Overvotes 104 1 14 O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Mail Ballot
210,982 849 22,586 1,326
NO 164,604 1,204 38,826 1,092
Total Votes 375,586 2,053 61,412 2,418
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0 0 0
San Bernardjno County PROPOSITION 26 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 390,240 2,140 63,909 2,538
Undervotes 13,044 67 2,313 134
Overvotes 105 0 9 O
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Mail Ballot
YES 125,099 653 19,507 1,016
NO 251,992 1,420 42,080 1,388
Total Votes 377,091 2,073 61,587
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
UnresolvedWrite—|n O O 0 0
San Bernardino County PROPOSITION 27 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 390,240 2,140 63,909 2,538
Undervotes 10,935 65 2,352 124
Overvotes 0 11 1
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional Mail Ballot
65,429 342 12,747 797
NO 313,798 1,733 48,799 1,616
Total Votes 379,227 2,075 61,546 2,413
MailBallot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
0 O O 0
Total
458,827 / 1,138,702
17,239
119
Total
235,743
205,726
441,469
Total
Total
458,827/ 1,138,702
15,558
114
Total
146,275
296,880
443,155
Total
Total
458,827 / 1,138,702
13,476
90 Total
79,315
365,946
445,261
Total
40. 29%
53.40%;
46.60%
40.29 %
33.01%
66.99%-
40.29%
17.81 %; 32.19
%
Unresolved Write-In
YE
78 YE
12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Page: 72 of 78
San Bernardino County PROPOSITION 28 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 390,240 2,140
Undervotes 13,825 87
Overvotes 69 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
YES 228,047 957
NO 148,299 1,096
Total Votes 376,346 2,053
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0
Polling Place
63,909
3,404
6 Polling Place
29,643
30.856
60,499
PollingPlace
Provisional
2,538
111
0 Provisional
1,619
808
2,427
Provisional
San Bernardino County PROPOSITION 29 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 390,240 2,140
Undervotes 15,418 99
‘Overvotes 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
YES 112,465 482
NO 262,224 1,559
Total Votes 374,689 2,041 ‘ Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 390,240 2,140
Undervotes 14,116 97
Overvotes 181 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
YES 130,491 496
NO 245,452 1,546
Total Votes 375,943 2,042
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
O 0
Polling Place
63,909
4,084
I 13
Polling Place
16,930
42,882
. . .5.9r§l.2.
Polling Place
Polling Place
63,909
3,746
10 PollingPlace
14,979
45,174
60,153
Polling Place
Provisional
2,538
N 141.
2 Provisional
1,067
1,328
2,395
Provisional
Provisional
2,538
127
0 Provisional
1,044
1,367
2,411
Provisional
Total
458,827 / 1,138,702
17,427
75 Total
260,266
181,059
441,325
Total
Total
458,827 / 1,138,702
19,742
148
Total
130,944
307,993
438,937
Total
Total
458,827 / 1,138,702
18,086
192
Total
147,010
293,539
440,549
Total
40.29%
58.97%;
41.03%
.
40.29 %?
29.33%,
70.17%
40.29%.
33.37%
;66.
63%
;
San Bernardino County PROPOSITION 30 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (‘100.00%)
Unresoived Write—|n
Unresolved Write—|n
12/8/2022 8:09:36AM
Page: 73 of 78
San Bernardino County PROPOSITION 31 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional Total Times Cast 389,805 2,140 63,882 2,536 458,363 / 1,138,702 40.25% Undervotes 11,116 59 2,477 108 13,760
Overvotes 195 O 15 1 211
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total Mail Ballot
YES 215,428 948 27,313 1,232 244,921 55.11
%}
NO 163,066 1,133 34,077 1,195 199,471 44.
89%
’ Total Votes 378,494 2,081 61,390 2,427 444,392
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 O O O
Rialto Uni?ed School District MEASURE A (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 125 of 125 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 17,127 24 2,539 80
Undervotes 889 0 169 11
Overvotes 0 0 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Mail Ballot
BONDS YES 11,364 15 1,532 49
BONDS NO 4,871 9 838 20
Total Votes 16,235 24 2,370 69
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write-In 0 0 0 0
San Bernardino County MEASURE D (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place Provisional
Times Cast 389,805 2,140 63,882 2,536
Undervotes 35,235 206 6,743 536
Overvotes 151 15 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Mail Ballot
YES 209,597 1,039 30,015 1,243
NO 144,822 894 27,109 757
Total Votes 354,419 1,933 57,124 2,000
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional
Mail Ballot
0 0 0 0
Total
19,770 / 64,854
1,069
3 Total
12,960
5,738
13:???
Total
Total
458,363 / 1,138,702
42,720
167
Total
241,894
173,582
‘l.l..5'47§
Total
30.48%
;
69.31%
30.69%
40. 25%
;
58.22 %’ 41 .78
%
Unresolved Write—!
UnresolvedWrite—|n
12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Page: 74 of 78
San Bernardino County MEASURE EE (Vote for
Precincts Reported:2,765 of 2,765 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
Times Cast 389,805 2,140 63,882
Undervotes 31,685 171 5,890
Overvotes 93
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place
MailBallot
YES 179,278 954 31,078
NO 178,749 1,013 26,909
Total Votes
g 1,967 57,987
MailBallot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n O O 0
City of Barstow MEASURE H (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 50 of 50 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M Polling Place
Times Cast 2,982 14 707
Undervotes 287 2 73
Overvotes 1 0 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place
MailBallot
230
403
633
1)
Provisional
2,536
463
0 Provisional
1,305
768
2,073
Provisional
Provisional
19 5
0 Provisional
Total
458,363 / 1,138,702
38,209
100
Total
212,615
207,439
420,054
Total
Total
3,722 / 10,895
367
2 Total
1,326
2,027
3,353
40.25%;
50.62%
49.38%
34.16%
39.55%
60.45%.
275
718
982
1,700
MailBallot
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
O
103
167
270
Polling Place
11 29
40 Provisional
832
1,178
2,
010
Total
MailBallot Designated Polling Place
MailBallot
UnresolvedWrite—|n O O 0
City of Big Bear Lake MEASURE 0 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: SDof 50 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
Times Cast 1,738 O
Undervotes 38 O S
Overvotes 0 0 O
Candidate Party MailBallot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
O
0 Provisional
Provisional
46 6
O
Provisional
Total
Total
2,059 / 3,037 67.80%
49 0
Total
41. 39%58.61
YE
S
NO
Total Votes
Unresolved Write-In
1,087
1. 607
2,694
11 Total Votes 12 14
YE
12/8/2022 8:09:36 A
1,044 53.87%.
732 894 46.13
1,651 252 1,938 %
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place Provisional Total
Mail Ballot
0 0 O O
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
1,738
86 1
Mail Ballot
919
0 275
0 23
O 0
Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
0 110
0 0
Provisional
46 11
0 Provisional
15 20
35 Total
2,059 / 3,037 67.80%
; 120
1 Total
City of Big Bear Lake MEASURE P (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: S0 of 50 (100.00°/a)
YES
NO
City of Colton MEASURE S (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 51 of 51 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
‘ Overvotes
Candidate
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—ln
City of GrandTerrace MEASURE M (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
YES
NO
Total Votes
Party
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
6,898
356
0 Mail Ballot
4,403
2.139
6,542
Mail Ballot
O
O
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
O
0 0
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Mail Ballot Designated M
3,318
172
1 Mail Ballot
1,677
1,468
3,145
Mail Ballot
O
O
O
Designated
MailBallot
0 O
O
Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
1,147
62 0
Polling Place
684
401
1,085
Polling Place
Polling Place
536
32 1
Polling Place
210
293
503
Polling Place
Provisional
42 8
0 Provisional
23 11
34 Provisional
Provisional
15 3
0 Provisional
Provisional
Total
8,087 / 25,748
426
0 Total
5,110
2,551
g 7,651
Total
Total
3,869 / 7,853
207
2 Total
1,895
1,765
3,660
Total
31.41 %
66.70 %: 33.30
%?
49.27%
51.78 %%48.
22%
Unresolved Write—|n
YE
S
NO
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—|n
142
Page: 75 of 78 12/8/2022 8:09:36 A
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
YES
NO
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
5,225 O
344 0
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
3,464 0
1,417 0
4,881 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
0 0
Polling Place
813
64 1
Polling Place
487
261
748
Polling Place
Provisional
40 10
O
Provisional
23 7
30 Provisional
Total
6,078 / 17,895 33.96%
418
1 Total
3,974
1,685
5,659
Total
City of Montclair MEASURE R (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
YE
S
NO
City of Montclair MEASURE 11 (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
Times Cast 5,225“ 0 813
Undervotes 315 O 59
Overvotes 0 0 1
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
0 369
O 384
0 753
Mail Ballot Designated PollingPlace
Mall Ballot
Unresolved Write—|n O O 0
City of Needles MEASURE N (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:1 of1 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M Polling Place
Times Cast 803 O 278
Undervotes 57 O 23
Overvotes O 0 0
Candidate Party Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place
MailBallot
509
237
746
Mail Ballot Designated Polling Place
Mail Ballot
Provisional
40 11
0 Provisional
17 12
29 Provisional
Provisional
9 1
O
Provisional
Provisional
Total
6.973/T171895 33.96
385 %;
1 Total
5,692
Total
Total
1,090/2,105 51.78%
’ 81
0 Total
661 65.51%
348 34.49%
1,009
Total
144
111
YE
S
NO
Total Votes
Unresolved Write—|n
255
51.91%.
48.09%‘
2,569
2,341
Total Votes 4,910
2,737
2,955
Unresolved Write—|n
29.78 70.22
Page: 76 of 78 12/8/20228:09:36 AM
Page: 77 of 78
City of Ontario MEASURE Q (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 110 of 110 (100.00%)
Mail Ballot Designated M
Times Cast 27,546
Undervotes 1,448
Overvotes
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
YES 13,915
NO 12,180
Total Votes 26,095
Mall Ballot
O
1 0
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 1
1 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
4,035
293
1 Polling Place
1,955
1,786
3,741
PollingPlace
City of Redlands MEASURE F (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 95 of 95 (100.00%)
MailBallot Designated M
Times Cast 21,041
Undervotes 1,871
Overvotes 5
Candidate Party Mail Ballot
MailBallot
0 9
O
0 Designated
Mail Ballot
2 7
9 Designated
Mail Ballot
0 Polling Place
3,274
297
1 Polling Place
Polling Place
Provisional
207
42 O
Provisional
102.
63 165
Provisional
Provisional
144
27 O
Provisional
65 117
Provisional
Total
31,789 / 87,019
1,783
4 Total
15,972
14,030
30,002
Total
Total
24,468 / 45,411
2,195
6 Total
8,504
13,763
22,267
Total
36.53 %:
53.24%
46.76%
53.88 %:
38.19%‘
61.81%
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate
YES
NO
Total Votes
Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
21,041 9
1,467 O
3 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
10,956
8,615
19.571 9
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
3,274
253
0 PollingPlace
1,1231
1,898
3,021
Polling Place
Provisional
144
26 O
Provisional
54 64
118
Provisional
Total
24,468]45,411 53.88%
1,746
3 Total
12,135 53.41%
10,584 46.59
%; 22,719
Total
City of Redlands MEASURE J (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:95 of 95 (100.00%)
Unresolved Write-In
YE
S
NO
813
2,163
2,976
7,637
11,528
Total Votes 19,165
Unresolved Write-ln
52 UnresolvedWrite-In
12/8/20228:09:36A
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
20,641 0
967 0
4 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
O
0 0
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
3,288
155
0 Polling Place
1,241
1,892.
3,133
Polling Place
Provisional
135
19 O
Provisional
80 36
116
Provisional
Total
24,064 / 47,753 50.39%
1,141
4 Total
0,222 44.
50%; 12.697 55.40%
: 22,919
Total
City of Upland MEASURE L (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:S9 of 59 (100.00%)
YE
S
NO
Times Cast
Undervotes
Overvotes
Candidate Party
Mail Ballot Designated M
5,603 26
239 1
O 0
Mail Ballot Designated
MailBallot
Mail Ballot Designated
Mail Ballot
O 0
Polling Place
780
54 0
Polling Place
Polling Place
Provisional
34 O
0 Provisional
19 15
34 Provisional
Total
6,443 / 12,501 51.54%
294
0 Total
4,412 71.75%
1,737 28.25%
6,149
Total
Town of Yucca Valley MEASURE K (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported:62 of 62 (100.00%)
439
11 287
3,940
1,424
Total Votes 5,364
Unresolved Write-In
726
YE
S
NO
8,901
10,769
Total Votes 19,670
Unresolved Write-In
12/8/20228:09:36 A Page: 78 of 78
' .1'<irm Rcoi frar
[:1‘Mil.+;:~ u~;~>*
.1‘
www.SBCounty.
‘AN BERNARD Michael Jimenez
Registrar of Voters Interim Registrar of Voters
SAN IBERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
I, Stephenie Shea, Interim Assistant Registrar of Voters of San Bemardino County, do hereby certify that, in pursuance of the provisions of Elections Code section 15300, et seq., I did canvass the results of the votes cast in the General Election held in said County on November 8, 2022, for measures and contests that were submitted to the vote of the voters, and that the Certi?ed Election Results to which this certi?cate is attached is full, true and correct.
I hereby set my hand and official seal this 8thday of
December, 2022, at San Bemardino County.
(.Z01..PAu1, Coox (RE'r.) JANICF,I{U'I'HF.1:I-om) DAw.\‘ Row}: Cu RT H.-\c;.\i.»\N ]OF.BACA,I First District Second District Vim.’Chair, '[hird District (‘.]1airm:u1. Fmlrth Dislrirt I-ifth 1)Lstriv;'t Stephenie Shea
Interim Assistant Registrar of Voters
San Bernardino County
State of California
CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
OF THE RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF THE
NOVEMBER 8, 2022, GENERAL ELECTION
SS.
777 East Rialto Avenue, San Bemardino, CA 92415 | Phone: 909.387.8300 Fax: 909.387.2022
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Community Development Director
FOR MEETING: Dec 13 2022
SUBJECT: Updates to the Housing Element, Safety Element, and Land Use Element of the General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council conduct the Public Hearing, consider public comment, and adopt the Resolution approving the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, and adopting amendments to the Housing, Safety and Land Use Elements ORDER OF PROCEDURE:
Request Staff Report (Community Development Director
Presenting)
Council Questions of Staff
Open the Public Hearing
Receive Public Comment
Close the Public Hearing
Council Discussion
Motion/Second
Discussion on Motion
Call the Question
ATTACHMENTS:
• GPA CC Reso 12.13.22
BACKGROUND:
This request amends three Elements of the General Plan: Housing, Safety and Land Use. All are being amended due to the requirements of State law. Each amendment is described separately below. Please note that the Housing Element update is comprehensive and affects the entire document. Therefore, it is not provided in Track Changes, and should be considered as a wholly new document. The Safety Element and Land Use Element changes, on the other hand, are specific to certain paragraphs, and are provided in Track Changes for ease of review.
Housing Element Update
The City is required to update its Housing Element every eight years. The 5th Cycle planning period ended October 2021. The 6th Cycle extends from October 2021 through October 2029. The planning cycle is tied to the preparation of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The RHNA was adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for all its member cities and counties and assigns an anticipated need for housing to each jurisdiction during the next eight years. The City’s RHNA is depicted in Table 1, below:
Table1
TWENTYNINEPALMSRHNA2022–2029
IncomeCategory Units Percentage
ExtremelyLow 115 11%
VeryLow 116 11%
Low 127 12%
Moderate 185 18%
AboveModerate 504 48%
Total 1,047 100%
Source:SouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments,2021
Government Code Section 65580 et. seq. establishes the requirements for Housing Elements, including the City’s responsibility to remove barriers to all types of housing, particularly affordable housing. With the 6th Cycle, State law also requires that the City include an analysis of how it is Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) and determine whether additional policies and programs are required to assure fair housing throughout the community. The Housing Element is the only General Plan Element that requires review and approval by a State Agency, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
The Housing Element has not substantially changed from the currently adopted document in terms of policy direction. The most significant change is the addition of Appendix A, the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), which is a new requirement of law. This section details areas of poverty, segregation and disparity in order to assure that the City implement programs that assure that all its residents can find housing throughout the community during the planning period. In addition, policies and programs have been added to address changes in State law which will require changes to the Development Code, including:
• Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. • Density Bonuses
• Adding Employee Housing and Low Barrier Navigation Centers for homeless individuals • Congregate Care Facilities (7 or more) location restrictions • Changing multi-family approvals in the High Density zone from AUP/CUP to Site Plan Review.
In addition to the update required for the AFH, the City is required to identify sufficient sites within the City to accommodate the RHNA, or a total of 1,047 units. Although it is not the City’s responsibility to build these units, the Housing Element must assure that there are no impediments to its being built, and that there are sufficient sites available. The Element identifies 18 sites, as shown in Table 2. City staff purposely included more sites than are needed to meet the RHNA, to provide some flexibility as projects are proposed.
Table2
Vacant Land Inventory for Very Low, Low, Moderate, and Above Moderate Income Units Lower Income Housing Sites
Site ID
Parcel
Number
(APN)
Zoning General Plan
Designation
Allowable/RealisticDensity
du/ac Acres
Realistic
Capacity
(units)
4 62308306 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 0.99 20
5 62308307 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 0.99 20
6 62308310 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 1.12 22
7 62308303 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 3.22 64
8 62313109 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 10.15 203
9 62313107 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 5.20 101
10 62317101 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 9.15 183
11 62313106 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 13.06 261
12 62307205 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 1.02 20
13 62307204 High Density
Residential
High Density
Residential 24/20 4.81 96
14 61826205 Public Public 80.00% 3.21 60
Total Affordable Units 1,050
Moderate Income Housing Sites
1 62229114 Medium Density
Residential
Multi-Family
Residential 8 19.92 159
2 62124115 Medium Density
Residential
Multi-Family
Residential 8 9.71 78
Above Moderate Income Housing Sites
3 62124108 Medium Density
Residential
Multi-Family
Residential 8 9.75 78
15 61808113 Single Family
Residential
Single Family
Residential 4 16 61
16 62103132
62103133
Single Family
Residential
Single Family
Residential 4
80.18 20.58 336
17 62122201 Single Family
Residential
Single Family
Residential 3 31.02 77
18 62123111
62123114
Single Family
Residential
Single Family
Residential 3
63.55 6.96 177
Total Market Rate Units 966
TOTAL INVENTORY UNITS 2,016
The continued issue with providing higher density residential is the lack of sanitary sewer, but the City’s current efforts to implement a sewer system, and the continued use of package treatment plants will allow the development of these sites.
The City started the Housing Element Update process in October of 2020 and diligently pursued its completion.
The process began with a comprehensive update of demographic information, and a community workshop, held on May 26, 2021. A study session was also held with the Planning Commission in February of this year.
The first draft was submitted to HCD November 29 of 2021. HCD provided comments on January 28, 2022. The City made changes in response to these comments and resubmitted to HCD on April 8, 2022. HCD provided a second set of comments on June 7, 2022. Between June and September, the City worked with HCD staff to make final amendments. Although HCD was slow to respond, they have indicated in emails that the Housing Element attached for the Planning Commission’s review contains the required information, policies and programs to make it consistent with State law. Staff is therefore requesting that the City Council adopt the Element, so that it can be sent to HCD for final review and certification.
Safety Element
State law requires that the Safety Element be updated at the same time as the Housing Element to address changes in wildland fire zones and flood zone mapping, as well as a requirement to address climate change adaptation. The changes in the text reflect the requirement of law that the City be prepared and resilient for fire and flooding hazard, including implementation of its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). In addition, a Climate Change Adaptation subsection has been added. Minimal changes are proposed in policies – Implementation Policy SF-2.8 has been added to assure that critical facilities are not located in flood zones; and Implementation Policies SF-6.12 and 6.13 have been added relating to the LHMP and climate change resilience. The changes proposed are intended to only address the requirements of State law, and do not change the policy direction of the Element. All proposed changes are shown in Track Changes in the attached draft document.
Land Use Element
The changes to the Land Use Element consist of two changes in the maps (Exhibits LU-3 and LU-5) to include the recently adopted Downtown Specific Plan, and a text addition starting on page LU-86 to add a description of Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities, which is a requirement of State law. The section addresses the
location of these communities in the Sphere of Influence, and the provision of infrastructure and services to these communities. No changes in Policy or Programs are proposed to the Land Use Element.
Conclusion
As described above, the changes proposed to the Land Use and Safety Element are not significant, and do not change the policy direction or vision of the General Plan. The Housing Element Update is a substantial re-writing of the Element to assure that the City will comply with State law and be in a position to provide for its share of the Regional Housing Need for the period from 2021 to 2029. The policies and programs included in the Housing Element have been modified to assure that the City can facilitate the development of future housing projects for all its residents, present and future.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Prior to recommending a General Plan Amendment to the City Council for approval, the Planning Commission must make findings, consistent with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 19.50.070. The recommended findings are provided below, and have been included in the attached Resolution.
A. The amendments will not adversely impact the existing community, insofar as the changes to the Land Use and Safety Element only provide more detail on conditions in the City, and the Housing Element Update does not change land use designations, and therefore would result in similar development and development patterns as the current General Plan allows.
B. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the vision, goals and policies of the General Plan as a whole, insofar as the changes are associated with changes in State law, and continue to facilitate the development of housing for all residents, regardless of their economic status C. The amendment prescribes reasonable controls and standards for affected land uses to ensure compatibility and integrity of those uses with other established uses, insofar as the proposed amendments to all three Elements will not result in any changes to land use patterns, and the land use map changes are proposed to assure consistency with the recently adopted Downtown Specific Plan.
D. The amendment provides for the protection of the general health, safety and/or welfare of the community by adding information and greater detail to the General Plan’s flooding and fire hazard zones and focusing on the provision of critical public facilities outside of flood zones, to assure the public’s safety.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City prepared an Initial Study for the proposed amendments, and circulated it for public comment from January 5 to January 26, 2022. The Initial Study found that there would be no impact to the environment, because the changes relate to text and policy of the General Plan only, and no development will occur. Furthermore, individual projects which will be developed in the future will be subject to CEQA, and will be required to address the project-specific impacts occurring at the time development is proposed. No public comments were received. A Negative Declaration is proposed.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council could reject these amendments and direct Staff to make modifications.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable
CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TWENTYNINE
PALMS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO
UPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT, SAFETY ELEMENT AND LAND USE ELEMENT.
WHEREAS, the City of Twentynine Palms General Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 24, 2012; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65580 et. seq. requires the periodic updating of the City’s Housing Element based on a pre-determined schedule; and WHEREAS, the 6th Cycle planning period and its associated Regional Housing Needs Assessment is from October 2021 to October 2029; and
WHEREAS, SB 244 required that the City update information on disadvantaged unincorporated communities in its boundaries and its Sphere of Influence in the Land Use Element; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65302 requires that Safety Elements be updated to include State and Local Fire Hazard Zones, updated flooding maps and information, and climate resiliency information and policies; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022, the Planning Commission held a study session to discuss the update of the Housing Element and other elements; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2022, the General Plan Amendment was duly noticed on November 2, 2022 in the Desert Trail, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Twentynine Palms; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65353 et seq., the Planning Commission held a public hearing pursuant to the notice required by law for this amendment; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Twentynine Palms conducted a duly noticed and advertised Public Hearing on the General Plan Amendment and considered the proposed Amendment; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, at the above noted Public Hearing for the General Plan Amendment, the Planning Commission considered the potential environmental impacts that may occur with the adoption of the proposed Amendment, and recommended that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration circulated for public review between January 5 and January 26, 2022; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, at the above noted Public Hearing, the Planning Commission considered any and all testimony from the public, and after due consideration
adopted this Planning Commission Resolution, forwarding a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the proposed General Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that on the basis of the whole record before it, including any public comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the proposed CEQA Determination reflects the Planning Commission’s independent judgment and analysis; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms conducted a duly noticed and advertised Public Hearing on the General Plan Amendment and considered the proposed Amendment; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, at the above noted Public Hearing for the General Plan Amendment, the City Council considered the potential environmental impacts that may occur with the adoption of the proposed Amendment, and in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines the City Council adopted the Negative Declaration circulated for public review between January 5 and January 26, 2022; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, at the above noted Public Hearing, the City Council considered any and all testimony from the public, and after due consideration adopted this City Council Resolution, forwarding a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the proposed General Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that on the basis of the whole record before it, including any public comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the proposed CEQA Determination reflects the City Council’s independent judgment and analysis; and
WHEREAS, the proposed text amendments to the Housing, Safety and Land Use Elements are consistent with the Goals and Policies of the City of Twentynine Palms General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Twentynine Palms City Council in its review of the proposed Development Code Amendment makes the following “Findings”, and adopted such “Findings”:
A. The amendments will not adversely impact the existing community, insofar as the changes to the Land Use and Safety Element only provide more detail on conditions in the City, and the Housing Element Update does not change land use designations, and therefore would result in similar development and development patterns as the current General Plan allows.
B. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the vision, goals and policies of the General Plan as a whole, insofar as the changes are associated with changes in State law, and continue to facilitate the development of housing for all residents, regardless of their economic status
C. The amendment prescribes reasonable controls and standards for affected land uses to ensure compatibility and integrity of those uses with other established uses, insofar as the proposed amendments to all three Elements will not result in any changes to land use patterns, and the land use map changes are proposed to assure consistency with the recently adopted Downtown Specific Plan.
D. The amendment provides for the protection of the general health, safety and/or welfare of the community by adding information and greater detail to the General Plan’s flooding
and fire hazard zones, and focusing on the provision of critical public facilities outside of flood zones, to assure the public’s safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL TAKES THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS:
Section 1. Based upon review of the proposed amendment of the Housing, Safety and Land Use Elements of the General Plan, the proposed amendment does not have the potential to have an adverse impact upon the environment and in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines adopts the Initial Study/Negative Declaration.
Section 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the City’s adopted General Plan Goals and Policies as the proposal will support implementation of the General Plan and State law.
Section 3. Approve and adopt the “Findings” required for approval of the Amendment as set forth above.
Section 4. The City of Twentynine Palms amensd the General Plan as reflected in Exhibit “A.”
Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Twentynine Palms shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.
Section 7. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the 13th day of December, 2022.
______________________________
Karmolette O’Gilvie, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Cindy Villescas CMC, City Clerk
I, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-____ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Twentynine Palms at a regular meeting thereof held on 13th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER:
_________________________________
Cindy Villescas CMC, City Clerk
Environmental Checklist Form
Project title: City of Twentynine Palms Housing and Safety Element Updates Lead agency name and address: City of Twentynine Palms
6136 Adobe Road
Twentynine Palms, CA 92277
Contact person and phone number: Travis Clark, Community Development Dir. 760-367-6799 X 1008
[email protected]
Project location: City-wide
Project sponsor's name and address: City of Twentynine Palms 6136 Adobe Road
Twentynine Palms, CA 92277
Existing General Plan designation: All Existing Zoning: All Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
Housing Element Update
As a mandated Element of the General Plan, the Housing Element analyzes the existing housing stock and existing and future housing needs based on demographic data, and provides strategies to meet the housing needs of the City’s residents. The Housing Element focuses on affordable housing and housing for special needs populations, including seniors, disabled persons (including developmental disabilities), large families, single parent households, and the homeless. The Goals, Policies, and Programs identified in this Housing Element will assist the City’s decision makers in facilitating housing development and preservation to address the needs. The City is complying with the mandatory update schedule for Housing Elements. This Update addresses the 2022- 2029 planning period. During this period, the City has been allocated the following housing units under the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG):
Income Category Number Of Units
Extremely low income 115
Very low income 116
Low income 127
Moderate income 185
Above moderate income 504
Total 1,047
Note that the extremely low and very low income categories are 50% each of the 231 units assigned for the very low category.
Source: SCAG
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
This Update consists primarily of statistical updates particularly relating to updating the 2010 Census and American Community Survey (ACS) information in the Element to 2019 ACS information, and reassessing housing needs based on these demographic changes.
This Update added sites identified for future housing, including parcels within the Downtown area and large sites zoned as Multi-Family Residential in the northern City.
The City is preparing a new Downtown Specific Plan which will guide development in the area, including the sites identified for housing. The future Specific Plan will not increase maximum allowable density beyond currently allowed by the General Plan and Development Code. All the other sites in the inventory will be developed accordingly with their General Plan and zoning designations. The only potential change in residential densities is the density bonus ordinance to be amended in accordance with state law, which will provide up to 50 percent bonuses depending on the affordable units mix (Program HS-6).
This Update does not propose any other significant change in policy; all changes in policy reflect the changes to the inventory and changes in state laws. AB 686 was passed by California Legislature in 2018 requiring that all housing elements due on or after January 1, 2021 must contain an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule (2015). This Update includes an AFH that analyzes patterns of segregation and equal access to opportunity within the City, consistent with AFFH Final Rule.
Safety Element
The Safety Element is updated along with the Housing Element as required by state law.
The Safety Element Update includes a Flood Hazard Zones Map (Exhibit SF-4) which reflects the current FEMA flood zones, and a Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map (Exhibit SF-5) which provides the current fire hazard mapping by CalFire. The Safety Element also addresses climate change impacts and adaptation, including its interaction with fire, flood, and extreme heat hazards. The Update expanded discussion on emergency preparedness at local and regional levels with reference to the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to be adopted in 2021 and the San Bernardino County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan approved by FEMA and adopted in 2017.
The Housing and Safety Elements apply to all lands throughout the City.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology /Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities / Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature
January 3, 2022
Date
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on projectspecific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
Exhibit
CALIFORNIA
SANBERNARDINOCOUNTY
TwentyninePalmsHousingandSafetyElementUpdates
RegionalLocationMap
TwentyninePalms,California 1
PACIFIC
OCEAN
MEXICO
TwentyninePalms
10.05.21
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant w/
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista? X
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited to,
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
X
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point). If the project is
in an urbanized area, would the project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
X
d) Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the area?
X
Sources: City of Twentynine Palms Development Code; Google Earth; City of Twentynine Palms General Plan.
Environmental Setting
The City of Twentynine Palms is located in the Morongo Basin which forms the southwestern corner of the Mojave Desert. In the basin, Joshua Tree National Park lies to the south of the City and the Marine Corps Ground Air Combat Center to the north. The Mojave Desert is separated from the Sonoran Desert to the south by the Little San Bernardino and Eagle Mountains, which are extensions of the Transverse Range. The western Mojave Desert is a flat, sparsely vegetated region interspersed with mountain ranges and dry lakes.
Discussion of Impacts
a-d) No Impact. The Housing and Safety Element Updates are policy documents and do not involve any construction or development. The Updates will have no impact on aesthetics, scenic vistas or light and glare. The Safety Element Update will not result in development, but will allow the City to better understand and plan for flooding and fire hazards in the community.
Future housing projects, as they are proposed, will be subject to City review for project design including architecture and landscaping and environmental review under CEQA for potential impacts on aesthetics. The City’s General Plan and Municipal Code set building height limits which prevent large or bulky structures
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
that may block scenic vistas. Future housing projects facilitated by this Housing Element Update will be developed in accordance with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality, and this Update proposes no change to these regulations.
According to the California Department of Transportation, Twentynine Palms Highway (State Highway 62) is an “eligible State Scenic Highway.” In the City’s General Plan, a small portion of Highway 62 is designated as a scenic highway (excluding that portion of the Highway 62 between Sunrise Road and Wilshire Avenue). The sites identified for future housing development are north of the portion of Highway 62 in the downtown area, where Highway 62 is not designated a scenic highway. The nearest site to Highway 62 is located approximately 0.39 miles to the north. The sites will not be visible from Highway 62, due to distance and intervening development. Therefore, views along the highway are not expected to change and no impact to this eligible scenic highway would occur.
Future development will be subject to the City Development Code Section 19.78 Lighting Standards, which require proper shielding of light sources and prohibit light spillage on adjacent properties. As individual projects are proposed, they will be required to submit a lighting plan prior to development and follow any required conditions of approval. Implementation of City lighting standards will ensure that no significant lighting impacts will occur.
Mitigation Measures: None required.
Monitoring: None required.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
w/ Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. -- Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
X
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract? X
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
X
d) Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
X
Sources: Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, 1984-2018, CA Dept. of Conservation; General Plan Land Use Map; Google Earth.
Environmental Setting
Agricultural production is generally not active in the Morongo Basin, nor in the City of Twentynine Palms. Commercial farming has not occurred in the City for decades, likely due to its arid environment. Neither the General Plan nor the Development Code contain agricultural or forestry designations or districts, but in certain districts agricultural and related uses are allowed with a Conditional/Administrative Use Permit or other restrictions.
There are no lands designated for forestry uses in the City, due to the lack of large trees and the urban nature of the community.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
Discussion of Impacts
a-e) No Impact. The Housing and Safety Element Updates are policy documents, and in and by themselves will not impact any agricultural or forest land. The Safety Element Update will not result in development, but will allow the City to better understand and plan for flooding and fire hazards in the community.
The sites identified for future housing in the inventory are not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, according to the California Dept. of Conservation, nor are they used for agricultural purposes.
These sites and lands adjacent to them consist of vacant land and patches of commercial, institutional, and residential uses. The proposed Updates will not result in any changes to lands designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance by the California Dept. of Conservation, nor to lands used for agricultural purposes.
There are no Williamson Act contracts on the sites identified for future housing or properties in the surrounding areas. The future housing sites are designated for Public, Multi-Family Residential or High Density Residential uses. The proposed Housing and Safety Element Updates will have no impact on lands designated for agricultural use.
The sites designated for housing development do not contain forest land, timberland or timberland zoned for timberland production. Therefore, the proposed Updates would not rezone forest land or timberland as defined by the Public Resources Code and Government Code. There will be no loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.
Given the absence of active farmlands in the City, there would be no indirect impact, due to the location or nature of the use, on conversion of Farmland to nonagricultural use. Given the absence of forest land in the City, the proposed Updates would have no indirect impact on conversion of forest land to non-forest use.
Mitigation Measures: None required.
Monitoring: None required.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
w/ Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the
significance criteria established by the
applicable air quality management district or
air pollution control district may be relied upon
to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan? X
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
X
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations? X
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
X
Sources: City of Twentynine Palms General Plan; MDAQMD CEQA and Federal Conformity Guidelines.
Environmental Setting
The City of Twentynine Palms is located within the Mojave Desert Air Basin (MDAB) under the jurisdiction of Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD). MDAQMD is geographically the second largest of the 35 air districts in the State of California. All development within the City is subject to MDAQMD’s 2016 “California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Federal Conformity Guidelines.” MDAQMD operates and maintains six regional air quality monitoring stations throughout its jurisdiction. The nearest monitoring station to the City of Twentynine Palms is in Lucerne Valley.
Criteria air pollutants are contaminants for which state and federal air quality standards (California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)) have been established. MDAQMD exceeds state and federal standards for ozone (O3) and PM10. As a result, MDAQMD has adopted federal attainment plans for ozone and PM10 under the federal Clean Air Act. Ambient air quality in the MDAQMD, including the City of Twentynine Palms, does not exceed state and federal standards for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxides, sulfur dioxide, lead, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, or visibility reducing particles.
Discussion of Impacts
a-d) No Impact. The Housing and Safety Element Updates will have no impact on air quality. The Updates are to the General Plan, a policy document, and will not generate any construction or development. The Safety Element Update provides new information on flooding and fire hazards and addresses climate resilience, which will not result in air pollutant emissions.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
According to MDAQMD’s 2016 CEQA and Federal Conformity Guidelines, a project is considered non-conforming if it conflicts with or delays implementation of any applicable attainment or maintenance plan. A project is conforming if it complies with all applicable District rules and regulations, complies with all proposed control measures that are not yet adopted from the applicable plan(s), and is consistent with the growth forecasts in the applicable plan(s), or is directly included in the applicable plan. Conformity with growth forecasts can be established by demonstrating that the project is consistent with the land use plan that was used to generate the growth forecast.
MDAQMD works directly with the San Bernardino County Association of Governments (SANBAG), San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), and local governments, and cooperates actively with all state and federal government agencies. SBCTA adopted the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020 RTP/SCS) developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The Demographics & Growth Forecast Technical Report of the RTP/SCS forms the basis of land use and transportation controls of air quality management plans. An example of a nonconforming project would be one that increases the gross number of dwelling units, increases the number of trips, and/or increases the overall vehicle miles traveled in an affected area relative to the applicable land use plan.
The Sites Inventory in this Housing Element Update includes parcels within the Downtown area and large sites zoned as Multi-Family Residential in the northern City. The City is preparing a new Downtown Specific Plan which will guide development in the area, including the two sites identified for housing. All the sites in the inventory will be developed accordingly with their General Plan and zoning designations. The Safety Element Update will not result in development, but will allow the City to better understand and plan for flooding and fire hazards in the community. Therefore, the proposed Updates are considered consistent with the 2020 RTP/SCS and not expected to conflict with any air quality plan.
As future housing development is proposed, the City will undertake CEQA review on an individual project level and assess potential impacts on air quality for each project, including emissions of criteria pollutants, pollutant concentrations near sensitive receptors, and emissions of odors. Mitigation measures will be implemented as necessary in compliance with MDAQMD rules and City requirements. All future projects will be required to comply with MDAQMD rules and guidelines. Typical measures include, but are not limited to, implementation of a dust control and management plan in conformance with MDAQMD Rule 403.2, phased application of architectural coatings and the use of low-polluting architectural paint and coatings per MDAQMD Rule 1113. In addition, the 2019 and later editions of the California Building Code will reduce air quality impacts during project operation by imposing more stringent energy efficiency standards, which will reduce regional emissions associated with the production of energy.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
According to the MDAQMD CEQA and Federal Conformity Guidelines, residences, schools, daycare centers, playgrounds and medical facilities are considered sensitive receptor land uses. The Housing Element Update will ultimately allow the development of additional housing which will add to the sensitive receptors in the City. However, should a use be proposed adjacent to these sensitive receptors which could emit high levels of pollutants, such as an industrial development or a gasoline service station, the CEQA analysis for these uses will require that their impacts to adjacent sensitive receptors, if any, be considered and mitigated.
In general, residential development does not create substantial odor problems.
Because of the City’s lack of central regional sanitary sewer facilities, housing projects are likely to require on-site wastewater treatment plants in higher density zones. Should onsite wastewater treatment facilities be proposed, they will be in the form of ‘package plants’ with self-contained treatment processes that do not operate in the open air. Construction and operation of such treatment facilities will be regulated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and reviewed by them and the City when projects are proposed. The proposed Updates will not result in odor impacts.
Mitigation Measures: None required.
Monitoring: None required.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
w/ Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the
project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including,
but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
X
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites? (General Plan)
X
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
X
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
X
Sources: Google Earth; City of Twentynine Palms General Plan; City of Twentynine Palms General Plan Update Draft Environmental Impact Report (2010).
Environmental Setting
The City of Twentynine Palms is located within the Mojave Desert biome in the western Mojave Desert. The City participates in the West Mojave Plan, which, once adopted, will serve as a habitat conservation plan for both public and private entities in the West Mojave Desert. It will encompass approximately 3.6 million acres of public land and 2.8 million acres of private land that will include deserts throughout San Bernardino, Kern, Inyo, and Los Angeles Counties. The plan includes requiring focused surveys for Special Status Species, burrowing owl, and sensitive plants where suitable habitat is present.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
The City of Twentynine Palms General Plan establishes goals and policies to ensure that natural resources including the Oasis of Mara and desert tortoise within the Mesquite Dunes are protected. The San Bernardino County General Plan designates portions of the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) as the RC (Resource Conservation) land use zoning district. The County’s General Plan also includes a Biotic Resources (BR) Overlay to identify areas that include habitat for sensitive species.
Discussion of Impacts
a-f) No Impact. The Housing and Safety Element Updates are policy documents and will have no impact on biological resources. The Safety Element Update will not result in development, but will allow the City to better understand and plan for flooding and fire hazards in the community.
The sites identified for future housing development are located in an urban environment, and this Update will not facilitate development beyond what is currently allowed under the General Plan. As projects are proposed, their sitespecific biological conditions, including the presence of species of concern, will be assessed and mitigated if necessary, through the preparation of biological resource studies.
There are many washes and natural drainages in Twentynine Palms. As future housing projects are proposed, the City will require site-specific biological studies, where appropriate, during the CEQA process. The project-level studies will determine the presence of jurisdictional waters and riparian habitats, and the necessary permits and mitigation, if any.
Wildlife corridors link together areas of suitable wildlife habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance. As a result of a state interagency workshop, the Joshua Tree-Twentynine Palms Connection was designated within and near the City. The connection occurs in an ecological transition zone between the Mojave and Sonoran Desert eco-regions.
The linkage connects areas of open space in Joshua Tree National Park and the Marine Base. The connection spans 307,807 acres, of which approximately 71 percent currently receives some level of conservation protection. The majority of the City is outside the connection area (General Plan Exhibit CO-3). Most sites identified for housing development are not designated as or near any Wildlife Linkage Areas. A fraction of the site in the northern City adjacent to the Marine Base falls in the designated Wildlife Linkage Areas; however, long-standing surrounding urban uses and site disturbances especially along the perimeters would reduce the likelihood of the site serving as a wildlife corridor or nursery site.
Impacts will be assessed in project-level biological studies, and because the proposed Update does not change the residential designation of the site, no new impacts would occur. The project-level biological studies will provide mitigation for wildlife corridors, nursery sites, and habitats and species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and West Mojave Plan (upon adoption).
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
The sites identified for future housing development generally fall in the Desert Tortoise – Sparse Population habitat and Burrowing Owl habitat on the County BR Overlay map. The project-level biological studies will determine the presence of desert tortoises and burrowing owls and their habitats and provide necessary mitigation measures, which will be implemented per the project-level CEQA process. The proposed Updates will have no impact on the overlay districts nor any conflict with City or county regulations and plans.
Mitigation Measures: None required.
Monitoring: None required.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
w/ Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the
project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined
in '15064.5?
X
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to '15064.5?
X
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries? X
Sources: Twentynine Palms General Plan (2012).
Environmental Setting
The City is located on the southern edge of the Mojave Desert. Archaeologists generally divide prehistory in the Mojave Desert into five periods marked by changes in archaeological remains that date back some 12,000 years. The Lake Mojave period (ca. 8000-5500 B.C.) is associated with small mobile groups of hunters and gatherers who inhabited the Mojave Desert. These groups continued to inhabit the region during the Pinto Period (ca. 5500-2500 B.C.), and relied more on ground foods, small and large game animals, and the collection of plants. Distinct cultural changes occurred during the Newberry Period (ca. 1500 B.C.-500 A.D.), when small residential groups moved between select localities, established a geographically expansive land-use pattern and engaged in long-distance trade. The two ensuing periods, Saratoga (ca. 500-1200 A.D.) and Tecopa (ca. 1200-1770s A.D.), are characterized by seasonal group settlements near accessible food sources and the intensification of the use of plant foods, as evidenced by groundstone artifacts and the evolution of pottery.
The City is in an area historically occupied by two Native American groups, the Serrano and the Chemehuevi. Members of each tribe gathered at important base camps or villages for annual ceremonies and tribal interaction with neighboring groups.
In the Twentynine Palms area, the Serrano and the Chemehuevi relied on the waters of a desert oasis located approximately 0.5 miles south of today’s Highway 62 and west of Utah Trail. The Serrano first settled in the oasis and named it Maara, “the place of little springs and much grass”. The Chemehuevi began to settle around the oasis in the mid19th century.
While European contact may have occurred as early as 1771 or 1772, direct European influence on Serrano and Chemehuevi lifeways did not begin until the mission system expanded to the edge of Serrano territory in the 1810s. By the early 20th century, the majority of Serrano and Chemehuevi population was incorporated into the reservation system. Today, most Serrano descendants live on the San Manuel and the Morongo Indian Reservations, while the Chemehuevi are divided among the Chemehuevi, the Colorado River, and the Morongo Reservations.
City of Twentynine Palms
Housing and Safety Element Updates Initial Study
Non-Native settlement first occurred in the Twentynine Palms area by the late 1800s, when prospectors sought their fortunes in nearby gold camps. The first pioneer homesteaders arrived in 1910, and a small community started to grow. In 1952, the U.S.
Defense Department established a marine base north of the oasis for glider training, now known as the U.S. Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center. The City of Twentynine Palms was incorporated March 23, 1987.
Discussion of Impacts
a-c) No Impact. The adoption of the Housing and Safety Element Updates will not impact protection or significance of any cultural resources. The Safety Element Update provides new mapping and policy relating to flooding and fire hazards and climate adaptation, and will not result in any construction which might disturb cultural resources.
As future housing projects are proposed, the City will require site-specific cultural resource surveys to assess potential impacts on cultural resources, and provide mitigation to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. The sites identified for housing in the Housing Element Update are vacant, and thus least likely to contain historical resources. Prehistoric resources on these sites, if any, will be assessed as development is proposed and the City completes cultural resource studies for these sites as part of the CEQA process.
The City will also consult with interested tribes on potential cultural resources pursuant to AB 52 and/or SB 18, as it did for this Update (please see Tribal Cultural Resources, below).
Native American burial sites have been uncovered in the City, including within and near the Oasis of Maara south of Highway 62. All sites identified in the Sites Inventory are located north of Highway 62 and at least partially surrounded by existing development. Site-specific studies and necessary mitigation measures will help reduce potential impacts on human remains to less than significant levels. In addition, should any previously unidentified or unanticipated human remains be discovered during project development, state law requires that all activity stop, that the coroner be notified to determine the nature of the remains and whether Native American consultation is needed. This requirement of law assures no impact would occur to cemeteries or human remains.
Mitigation Measures: None required.
Monitoring: None required.