Ukiah City Council
September 4, 2024

1 6
5 4
3 2

FORD ROAD EMPIRE DRIVE DESPINA DRIVE
CAPPS
LANE

LOW GAP ROAD

BRUSH STREET

N STATE STREET

GARRETT DRIVE

ARLINGTON DR N BUSH STREET

FORD STREET N BUSH STREET

LOVERS LANE

BRIGGS STREET
Ukiah
LEGEND:
- AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
- PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
XX
(XX)
FIGURE 5

EXISTING SCHOOL YEAR PEAK HOUR

TRAFFIC VOLUMES
N
Empire Drive/Ford RoadN State Street
Low Gap Road/Brush Street N State StreetLow Gap Road N Bush Street Low Gap Road
Despina Drive
Empire Drive
Despina Drive
Capps Lane
Despina Drive
Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\T2506TG001.dwg Plot Date: 31 August 2018 - 1:56 PM Date
Report No.

City of Ukiah Project No.

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR SCHOOLS &

SURROUNDING AREA
11176246
001

07.12.2018
Source:

1 6
5 4
3 2

FORD ROAD EMPIRE DRIVE DESPINA DRIVE
CAPPS
LANE

LOW GAP ROAD

BRUSH STREET

N STATE STREET

GARRETT DRIVE

ARLINGTON DR N BUSH STREET

FORD STREET N BUSH STREET

LOVERS LANE

BRIGGS STREET
Ukiah
LEGEND:
- AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
- PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
XX
(XX)
FIGURE 6

EXISTING SUMMER PEAK HOUR

TRAFFIC VOLUMES
N
Empire Drive/Ford RoadN State Street
Low Gap Road/Brush Street N State StreetLow Gap Road N Bush Street Low Gap Road
Despina Drive
Empire Drive
Despina Drive
Capps Lane
Despina Drive
Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\T2506TG001.dwg Plot Date: 31 August 2018 - 2:08 PM Date
Report No.

City of Ukiah Project No.

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR SCHOOLS &

SURROUNDING AREA
11176246
001

07.12.2018
Source:

Appendix B: Intersection Turning Movement Counts

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08208-010 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 144 609 48 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 160 617 63 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 59 0 50
0 78 0 29
000 00 101 0 80
278 0 251 0 TEV 1910 0 2397 0 000
46 0 75 0 PHF 0.84 0.91
57 0 40 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 70 726 157 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 49 452 68 AM
S Empire Dr
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
222 0 308
N State St
746
0 N State St

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
295
0 PEAK HOURS
Total Vehicles (AM)
NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
780
1036
0 0
S Empire Dr

EASTBOUND
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
758
Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM)
N State St & S Empire Dr
Thursday
05/10/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Total Vehicles (Noon)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
162

COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)
AM NOON PM7
0 0
6 0 1 0 0 8
8 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
6 0
1 0
0 1
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
1 0
9 0
1 5
181
1142
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
80 29
50 57
46 278
14460948
4945268
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
101
78 59
40 75
251
16061763
70726157
0 0
2 0
0 1
161
060

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08208-012 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 129 553 39 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 102 628 27 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 118 0 42
0 97 0 94
000 00 16 0 24
103 0 109 0 TEV 1775 0 2148 0 000
75 0 54 0 PHF 0.81 0.92
132 0 102 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 78 805 12 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 72 477 35 AM
Low Gap Rd/Brush St
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
295 0 277
N State St
709
0 N State St

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
93 0

PEAK HOURS
Total Vehicles (AM)
NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
622
1032
0 0
Low Gap Rd/Brush St

EASTBOUND
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
746
Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM)
N State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St
Thursday
05/10/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Total Vehicles (Noon)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
149

COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)
AM NOON PM1
1 1
1 0 1 1 0 4
6 0 1 1 0
0 0
0 0
5 0
0 1
0 2
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
1 2
2 0
0 1
263
151
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
24 94
42 132
75 103
12955339
7247735
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
16 97
118
102
54 109
10262827
7880512
0 0
1 1
0 0
162
050

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08208-016 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 63 152 93 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 31 148 69 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 49 0 46
0 158 0 187
000 00 79 0 129
28 0 30 0 TEV 1339 0 1219 0 000
139 0 164 0 PHF 0.87 0.84
119 0 124 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 113 172 82 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 179 148 56 AM
Low Gap Rd
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
429 0 302
N. Bush St
400
0 N. Bush St

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
315
0 PEAK HOURS
Total Vehicles (AM)
NONE
02:45 PM - 03:45 PM
222
251
0 0
Low Gap Rd

EASTBOUND
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
351
Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM)
N. Bush St & Low Gap Rd
Thursday
05/10/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Total Vehicles (Noon)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
288

COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)
AM NOON PM5
3 7
14 0 0 1 0 2
24 0 3 10 0
0 0
0 2
6 0
17 5
0 29
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 3
0 9
0 0
021
330
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
129
187
46 119
139
28 6315293
17914856
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
79 158
49 124
164
30 3114869
11317282
1 2
1 3
0 0
030
532

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08208-017 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 118 0 79 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 29 0 110 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 109 0 63
0 100 0 307
000 00 000
92 0 71 0 TEV 853 0 593 0 000
194 0 174 0 PHF 0.76 0.62
000 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0000 AM
Low Gap Rd
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
425 0 129
Despina Dr
0 0
Despina Dr

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
284
0 PEAK HOURS
Total Vehicles (AM)
NONE
03:00 PM - 04:00 PM
155
180
0 0
Low Gap Rd

EASTBOUND
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
0 Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM)
Despina Dr & Low Gap Rd
Thursday
05/10/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Total Vehicles (Noon)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
273

COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)
AM NOON PM0
0 0
24 0 0 9 0 3
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 3
37 0
5 11
0 4
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 5
1 0
10 1
400
000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
0 307
63 0
194
92 118079
000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
0 100
109
0 174
71 290110
000
0 6
0 0
4 5
201
000

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08208-018 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 0 338 22 1 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 0 62 18 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 12 0 8
0 000
000 00 63 0 94
000 0 TEV 610 0 357 0 000
000 0 PHF 0.65 0.59
000 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 1 0 86 115 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 0 53 94 AM
Empire Dr
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
000
Despina Dr
432
0 Despina Dr

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
133
0 PEAK HOURS
Total Vehicles (AM)
NONE
03:00 PM - 04:00 PM
62 98
0 0
Empire Dr

EASTBOUND
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
126
Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM)
Despina Dr & Empire Dr
Thursday
05/10/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
Total Vehicles (Noon)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
116

COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)
AM NOON PM3
2 0
1 0 0 3 0 0
28 0 0 8 0
0 6
0 18
0 0
0 0
0 0
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
1 0
0 0
0 0
041
022
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
94 0
8 0
0 0
033822
05394
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
63 0
12 0
0 0
06218
086115
1 0
0 0
0 0
010
031

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08208-019 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 0 392 37 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 0 103 21 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 19 0 28
0 000
000 00 25 0 81
000 0 TEV 719 0 447 0 001
000 0 PHF 0.63 0.50
000 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 176 103 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 2 0 121 57 AM
Capps Ln
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
000
Despina Dr
475
0 Despina Dr

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
124
0 PEAK HOURS
Total Vehicles (AM)
NONE
03:00 PM - 04:00 PM
149
195
0 0
Capps Ln

EASTBOUND
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
128
Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM)
Despina Dr & Capps Ln
Thursday
05/10/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
Total Vehicles (Noon)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
95 COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)
AM NOON PM3
2 19
121 0 2 70 0 3
18 0 0 4 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
050
040
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
81 0
28 0
0 0
039237
012157
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
25 0
19 0
0 0
010321
0176103
1 0
0 0
0 0
020
041

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08350-001 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 100 457 31 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 114 519 42 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 70 0 32
0 46 0 20
000 00 96 0 32
189 0 202 0 TEV 1256 0 2009 0 000
19 0 39 0 PHF 0.85 0.92
36 0 38 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 56 662 125 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 19 281 40 AM
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
653
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
N State St & Empire Dr/Ford Rd
Wednesday
07/11/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Cars (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
90 COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)

PEAK HOURS
Cars (AM)
NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
502
934
0 0
Empire Dr/Ford Rd

EASTBOUND
N State St
525
0 N State St

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
206
0 Empire Dr/Ford Rd
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
139 0 216
AM NOON PM6
0 2
5 0 4 1 0 5
4 0 1 0 0
0 1
0 1
1 0
1 0
0 2
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 2
10 0
0 0
1108
0112
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
32 18
22 36
19 189
9944723
1927038
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
96 45
69 38
39 201
11250841
56657124
0 1
1 0
0 1
2111
051

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08350-002 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 81 407 43 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 80 531 79 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 148 0 47
0 59 0 57
000 00 22 0 20
58 0 101 0 TEV 1155 0 1887 0 000
58 0 75 0 PHF 0.79 0.85
64 0 70 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 47 660 15 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 34 268 18 AM
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
623
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
N State St & Low Gap Rd/ Brush St
Wednesday
07/11/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Cars (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
119

COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)

PEAK HOURS
Cars (AM)
NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
373
909
0 0
Low Gap Rd/ Brush St

EASTBOUND
N State St
491
0 N State St

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
169
0 Low Gap Rd/ Brush St
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
172 0 186
AM NOON PM2
2 1
2 0 1 0 0 5
1 0 2 6 0
0 4
0 2
2 0
1 2
0 4
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
1 2
2 0
1 0
190
373
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
19 55
45 64
57 58
8039843
3126115
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
22 59
145
69 73
100
7952776
4765715
0 0
3 1
2 1
143
030

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08350-003 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 39 118 50 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 8 100 47 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 42 0 24
0 81 0 104
000 00 71 0 66
7 0 29 0 TEV 705 0 780 0 000
58 0 96 0 PHF 0.68 0.82
51 0 39 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 29 170 68 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 49 84 55 AM
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
210
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
N Bush St & Low Gap Rd
Wednesday
07/11/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Cars (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
163

COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)

PEAK HOURS
Cars (AM)
NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
115
241
0 0
Low Gap Rd

EASTBOUND
N Bush St
235
0 N Bush St

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
211
0 Low Gap Rd
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
192 0 118
AM NOON PM0
4 1
0 0 2 0 0 0
1 0 1 3 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
5 1
0 2
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 5
1 9
1 0
220
440
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
66 99
23 42
57 7
3711650
458055
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
69 80
42 39
94 29
89746
2916866
2 1
0 0
2 0
031
022

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08350-004 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 33 0 54 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 9 0 31 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 42 0 18
0 46 0 70
000 00 000
705 0 TEV 230 0 165 0 000
48 0 32 0 PHF 0.70 0.94
000 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0000 AM
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
0 Cars (PM) HT (PM)
Despina Dr & Low Gap Rd
Wednesday
07/11/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Cars (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
102

COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)

PEAK HOURS
Cars (AM)
NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
25 47
0 0
Low Gap Rd

EASTBOUND
Despina Dr
0 0
Despina Dr

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
63 0
Low Gap Rd
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
103 0 55
AM NOON PM0
0 0
0 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 8
3 0
8 0
102
000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
0 62
15 0
40 7
32052
000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
0 46
42 0
32 5
9031
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08350-005 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 0 56 7 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 0 27 9 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 603
0 000
000 00 6 0 27
000 0 TEV 116 0 101 0 000
000 0 PHF 0.74 0.97
000 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 36 17 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 0 14 9 AM
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
33 Cars (PM) HT (PM)
Despina Dr & Empire Dr
Wednesday
07/11/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Cars (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
16 COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)

PEAK HOURS
Cars (AM)
NONE
03:45 PM - 04:45 PM
17 42
0 0
Empire Dr

EASTBOUND
Despina Dr
83 0
Despina Dr

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
26 0
Empire Dr
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
000
AM NOON PM0
1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
1 0
0 0
0 0
020
021
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
26 0
3 0
0 0
0547
0128
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
6 0
6 0
0 0
0278
03517
0 0
0 0
0 0
001
010

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 18-08350-006 Day:

City: Ukiah Date:

AM 0 80 6 1 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 0 40 1 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 601
0 000
000 00 1 0 11
000 0 TEV 125 0 103 0 000
000 0 PHF 0.74 0.89
000 0 0000

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 46 9 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 0 23 3 AM
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
41 Cars (PM) HT (PM)
Despina Dr & Capps Ln
Wednesday
07/11/2018

CONTROL

WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
Cars (NOON)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)

HT (NOON)
9 COUNT PERIODS

HT (AM)

PEAK HOURS
Cars (AM)
NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
25 52
0 0
Capps Ln

EASTBOUND
Despina Dr
91 0
Despina Dr

SOUTHBOUND
02:00 PM - 06:00 PM

NORTHBOUND
10 0
Capps Ln
07:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
000
AM NOON PM0
1 0
0 0 1 4 0 0
0 0 2 4 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
030
030
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
11 0
1 0
0 0
0776
0203
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/A
1 0
6 0
0 0
0391
0469
0 0
0 0
0 0
010
000

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

Appendix C: Synchro and SimTraffic Outputs

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 1: N State St & S Empire Rd/Ford Rd AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 278 46 57 80 29 50 49 452 68 48 609 144 Future Volume (veh/h) 278 46 57 80 29 50 49 452 68 48 609 144 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 331 55 68 95 35 60 58 538 81 57 725 171 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 245 124 154 122 58 99 78 1026 154 78 943 222 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.04 0.33 0.33 0.04 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 761 940 1781 617 1058 1781 3099 465 1781 2852 673 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 331 0 123 95 0 95 58 308 311 57 452 444 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1701 1781 0 1676 1781 1777 1787 1781 1777 1748 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 3.3 2.7 0.0 2.8 1.6 7.1 7.2 1.6 11.6 11.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 3.3 2.7 0.0 2.8 1.6 7.1 7.2 1.6 11.6 11.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.38
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 0 278 122 0 158 78 588 592 78 588 578 V/C Ratio(X) 1.35 0.00 0.44 0.78 0.00 0.60 0.74 0.52 0.53 0.74 0.77 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 245 0 335 631 0 264 666 1119 1125 701 944 929 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.9 0.0 19.2 23.3 0.0 22.1 24.0 13.7 13.8 24.0 15.3 15.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 181.5 0.0 0.4 4.1 0.0 1.4 5.0 0.3 0.3 5.0 0.8 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 15.1 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.1 0.7 2.5 2.5 0.7 4.0 3.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 203.4 0.0 19.6 27.4 0.0 23.5 29.0 14.0 14.0 29.0 16.1 16.1 LnGrp LOS F A B C A C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 454 190 677 953
Approach Delay, s/veh 153.6 25.4 15.3 16.9
Approach LOS F C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.2 21.8 8.5 13.3 7.2 21.8 12.0 9.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 19.0 27.0 7.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 9.2 4.7 5.3 3.6 13.6 9.0 4.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 44.4
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 2: State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 103 75 132 24 94 42 72 477 35 39 553 129 Future Volume (veh/h) 103 75 132 24 94 42 72 477 35 39 553 129 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 127 93 163 30 116 52 89 589 43 48 683 159 Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 168 145 253 59 215 97 116 1223 89 82 987 230 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 609 1067 1781 1222 548 1781 3358 245 1781 2861 665 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 127 0 256 30 0 168 89 311 321 48 424 418 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1675 1781 0 1770 1781 1777 1826 1781 1777 1749 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 0.0 8.2 1.0 0.0 5.1 2.9 8.0 8.1 1.6 12.2 12.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 8.2 1.0 0.0 5.1 2.9 8.0 8.1 1.6 12.2 12.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.38
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 168 0 398 59 0 312 116 647 665 82 613 604 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.00 0.64 0.51 0.00 0.54 0.76 0.48 0.48 0.59 0.69 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 599 0 844 449 0 743 449 1343 1380 449 1343 1323 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.3 0.0 20.4 28.3 0.0 22.3 27.4 14.6 14.6 27.8 16.8 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.8 0.0 1.7 6.8 0.0 1.4 9.9 0.6 0.5 6.5 1.4 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 0.0 3.1 0.5 0.0 2.1 1.5 3.0 3.1 0.8 4.7 4.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.1 0.0 22.2 35.1 0.0 23.8 37.3 15.1 15.1 34.3 18.2 18.2 LnGrp LOS C A C D A C D B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 383 198 721 890
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.8 25.5 17.9 19.1
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.2 26.7 6.5 19.1 8.4 25.5 10.1 15.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 45.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 10.1 3.0 10.2 4.9 14.2 6.1 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.3 0.0 1.5 0.1 6.2 0.2 0.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.4
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Conditions
3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh31.7
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 139 119 129 187 46 179 148 56 93 152 63 Future Vol, veh/h 28 139 119 129 187 46 179 148 56 93 152 63 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.89 0.89 0.70 0.81 0.72 0.80 0.86 0.78 0.66 0.71 0.51 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 40 156 134 184 231 64 224 172 72 141 214 124
Number of Lanes 1 10110111111
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 2
HCM Control Delay 42.4 37 26.9 23.6

HCM LOS E E D C
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 0% 54% 0% 80% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 46% 0% 20% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 179 148 56 28 258 129 233 93 152 63 LT Vol 179 0 0 28 0 129 0 93 0 0
Through Vol 0 148 0 0 139 0 187 0 152 0
RT Vol 0 0 56 0 119 0 46 0 0 63
Lane Flow Rate 224 172 72 40 290 184 295 141 214 124
Geometry Grp 8888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.677 0.495 0.192 0.123 0.82 0.542 0.813 0.426 0.617 0.33 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.888 10.362 9.626 11.025 10.18 10.584 9.93 10.893 10.367 9.631 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 331 348 373 325 357 341 365 331 349 373
Service Time 8.655 8.129 7.392 8.79 7.944 8.348 7.693 8.66 8.134 7.397 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.677 0.494 0.193 0.123 0.812 0.54 0.808 0.426 0.613 0.332 HCM Control Delay 33.8 22.9 14.7 15.3 46.1 25.3 44.3 21.6 28.6 17.1 HCM Lane LOS D C B C E D E C D C
HCM 95th-tile Q 4.7 2.6 0.7 0.4 7.2 3.1 7.1 2 3.9 1.4

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Conditions
4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh16.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 92 194 307 63 79 118
Future Vol, veh/h 92 194 307 63 79 118
Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.82 0.81 0.70 0.86 0.62
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 146 237 379 90 92 190
Number of Lanes 0 11010
Approach EB WB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 0 1 1
HCM Control Delay 16.3 19.2 13.7

HCM LOS C C B
Lane EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 32% 0% 40%
Vol Thru, % 68% 83% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 17% 60%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 286 370 197
LT Vol 92 0 79
Through Vol 194 307 0
RT Vol 0 63 118
Lane Flow Rate 383 469 282
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.59 0.688 0.455
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.551 5.284 5.811
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 647 680 618
Service Time 3.604 3.334 3.868
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.592 0.69 0.456
HCM Control Delay 16.3 19.2 13.7
HCM Lane LOS C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.9 5.5 2.4

HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 82 28 121 57 37 392
Future Vol, veh/h 82 28 121 57 37 392
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 72 0220
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 63 63 63
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 130 44 192 90 59 622
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 983 311 0 0 284 0
Stage 1 239 -----
Stage 2 744 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 276 729 - - 1278 -
Stage 1 801 -----
Stage 2 470 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 253 610 - - 1272 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 253 -----
Stage 1 741 -----
Stage 2 466 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 33 0 0.7

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 297 1272 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.588 0.046 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 33 8 0
HCM Lane LOS - - D A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 3.5 0.1 -

HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
6: Despina Dr & S Empire Dr AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 94 8 53 94 23 338
Future Vol, veh/h 94 8 53 94 23 338
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 30880
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 65 65 65 65 65 65
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 145 12 82 145 35 520
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 761 166 0 0 235 0
Stage 1 163 -----
Stage 2 598 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 373 878 - - 1332 -
Stage 1 866 -----
Stage 2 549 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 346 857 - - 1308 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 346 -----
Stage 1 818 -----
Stage 2 539 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 22.3 0 0.5

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 363 1308 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.432 0.027 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 22.3 7.8 0
HCM Lane LOS - - C A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 2.1 0.1 -

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 1: N State St & S Empire Rd/Ford Rd PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 251 75 40 101 78 59 70 726 157 63 617 160 Future Volume (veh/h) 251 75 40 101 78 59 70 726 157 63 617 160 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 276 82 44 111 86 65 77 798 173 69 678 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 219 190 102 143 121 92 98 1020 221 87 961 249 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1133 608 1781 973 735 1781 2904 630 1781 2786 723 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 276 0 126 111 0 151 77 488 483 69 432 422 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1741 1781 0 1708 1781 1777 1757 1781 1777 1732 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 3.7 3.5 0.0 4.8 2.4 14.0 14.0 2.2 12.0 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 3.7 3.5 0.0 4.8 2.4 14.0 14.0 2.2 12.0 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.42
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 219 0 292 143 0 213 98 624 617 87 613 597 V/C Ratio(X) 1.26 0.00 0.43 0.78 0.00 0.71 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.79 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 219 0 306 564 0 240 596 1001 990 627 844 823 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.9 0.0 21.2 25.6 0.0 23.9 26.5 16.5 16.5 26.7 16.1 16.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 147.4 0.0 0.4 3.4 0.0 6.2 5.1 0.8 0.8 5.9 0.7 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 11.8 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 2.2 1.1 5.1 5.0 1.0 4.3 4.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 172.4 0.0 21.6 29.1 0.0 30.1 31.6 17.3 17.3 32.6 16.8 16.9 LnGrp LOS F A C C A C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 402 262 1048 923
Approach Delay, s/veh 125.1 29.6 18.4 18.0
Approach LOS F C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.8 25.0 9.6 14.5 8.1 24.6 12.0 12.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 19.0 27.0 7.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 16.0 5.5 5.7 4.4 14.0 9.0 6.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.7
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 2: State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 109 54 102 16 97 118 78 805 12 27 628 102 Future Volume (veh/h) 109 54 102 16 97 118 78 805 12 27 628 102 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 118 59 111 17 105 128 85 875 13 29 683 111 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 156 158 296 37 157 191 112 1297 19 57 1011 164 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 578 1087 1781 762 929 1781 3584 53 1781 3056 496 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 118 0 170 17 0 233 85 434 454 29 397 397 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1665 1781 0 1692 1781 1777 1860 1781 1777 1775 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 5.0 0.6 0.0 7.7 2.8 12.5 12.5 1.0 11.7 11.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 5.0 0.6 0.0 7.7 2.8 12.5 12.5 1.0 11.7 11.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.28
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 156 0 454 37 0 348 112 643 673 57 588 587 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.00 0.37 0.46 0.00 0.67 0.76 0.67 0.67 0.51 0.67 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 587 0 823 440 0 697 440 1318 1380 440 1318 1316 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.0 0.0 17.9 29.4 0.0 22.2 28.0 16.3 16.3 28.9 17.5 17.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.3 0.0 0.5 8.9 0.0 2.2 10.1 1.2 1.2 6.9 1.4 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 0.0 1.8 0.3 0.0 3.1 1.5 4.7 5.0 0.5 4.5 4.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.3 0.0 18.4 38.3 0.0 24.4 38.1 17.6 17.5 35.8 18.8 18.9 LnGrp LOS C A B D A C D B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 288 250 973 823
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.9 25.4 19.4 19.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 27.0 5.7 21.5 8.3 25.1 9.8 17.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 45.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 14.5 2.6 7.0 4.8 13.7 5.9 9.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.5 0.0 1.0 0.1 5.7 0.2 1.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.7
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Conditions
3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh32.9
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 164 124 79 158 49 113 172 82 69 148 31 Future Vol, veh/h 30 164 124 79 158 49 113 172 82 69 148 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.54 0.79 0.76 0.85 0.70 0.86 0.82 0.72 0.83 0.62 0.84 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 56 208 163 93 226 57 138 239 99 111 176 36
Number of Lanes 1 10110111111
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 2
HCM Control Delay 56.2 30.4 22.6 20

HCM LOS F D C C
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 0% 57% 0% 76% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 43% 0% 24% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 113 172 82 30 288 79 207 69 148 31
LT Vol 113 0 0 30 0 79 0 69 0 0
Through Vol 0 172 0 0 164 0 158 0 148 0
RT Vol 0 0 82 0 124 0 49 0 0 31
Lane Flow Rate 138 239 99 56 371 93 283 111 176 36
Geometry Grp 8888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.388 0.639 0.244 0.154 0.942 0.261 0.742 0.328 0.494 0.094 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.149 9.626 8.892 9.962 9.143 10.124 9.443 10.615 10.09 9.354 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 354 375 403 362 400 355 384 338 358 383
Service Time 7.912 7.388 6.655 7.662 6.843 7.884 7.202 8.382 7.856 7.12 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.39 0.637 0.246 0.155 0.927 0.262 0.737 0.328 0.492 0.094 HCM Control Delay 19.2 28 14.5 14.5 62.4 16.4 35 18.5 22.4 13.1 HCM Lane LOS C D B B F CDCCB
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.8 4.2 0.9 0.5 10.5 1 5.8 1.4 2.6 0.3

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Conditions
4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh15.4
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 71 174 100 109 110 29
Future Vol, veh/h 71 174 100 109 110 29
Peak Hour Factor 0.61 0.64 0.57 0.57 0.40 0.68
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 33333
Mvmt Flow 116 272 175 191 275 43
Number of Lanes 0 11010
Approach EB WB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 0 1 1
HCM Control Delay 16.6 14.2 15.3

HCM LOS C B C
Lane EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 29% 0% 79%
Vol Thru, % 71% 48% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 52% 21%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 245 209 139
LT Vol 71 0 110
Through Vol 174 100 0
RT Vol 0 109 29
Lane Flow Rate 388 367 318
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.599 0.534 0.523
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.554 5.243 5.926
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 648 686 607
Service Time 3.606 3.298 3.98
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.599 0.535 0.524
HCM Control Delay 16.6 14.2 15.3
HCM Lane LOS C B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 4 3.2 3

HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 19 176 103 21 103
Future Vol, veh/h 25 19 176 103 21 103
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 21 124 0 21 21 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 50 38 352 206 42 206
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 787 600 0 0 579 0
Stage 1 476 -----
Stage 2 311 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 360 501 - - 995 -
Stage 1 625 -----
Stage 2 743 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 311 346 - - 949 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 311 -----
Stage 1 566 -----
Stage 2 708 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 20.1 0 1.5

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 325 949 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.271 0.044 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.1 9 0
HCM Lane LOS - - C A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.1 0.1 -

HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
6: Despina Dr & S Empire Dr PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 12 86 115 18 62
Future Vol, veh/h 63 12 86 115 18 62
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 1 0 18 18 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 59 59 59 59 59 59
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 107 20 146 195 31 105
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 434 263 0 0 359 0
Stage 1 262 -----
Stage 2 172 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 579 776 - - 1200 -
Stage 1 782 -----
Stage 2 858 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 534 743 - - 1152 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 534 -----
Stage 1 729 -----
Stage 2 849 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 13.3 0 1.8

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 559 1152 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.227 0.026 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.3 8.2 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.9 0.1 -

Queuing and Blocking Report
Existing Conditions 08/28/2019
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area SimTraffic Report GHD Page 2
Intersection: 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T R L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 145 421 176 310 124 246 108 142 285 151 Average Queue (ft) 37 138 54 75 56 61 29 40 75 28
95th Queue (ft) 123 342 139 217 115 176 69 112 218 105
Link Distance (ft) 875 631 614 793
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 110 75 75 105 80
Storage Blk Time (%) 25 4 8 15 2 0 0 10 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 12 13 33 5 0 1 25 5
Intersection: 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr
Movement EB WB SB
Directions Served LT TR LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 176 290 131
Average Queue (ft) 71 95 56
95th Queue (ft) 132 227 98
Link Distance (ft) 931 982 1378
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln
Movement WB NB SB
Directions Served LR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 160 79 256
Average Queue (ft) 53 15 66
95th Queue (ft) 119 53 182
Link Distance (ft) 211 1378 384
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 102

Queuing and Blocking Report
Existing Conditions 08/28/2019
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area SimTraffic Report GHD Page 2
Intersection: 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T R L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 761 153 300 113 176 110 92 182 98 Average Queue (ft) 55 361 40 94 37 62 41 28 68 6
95th Queue (ft) 173 947 120 270 90 137 89 68 135 44
Link Distance (ft) 1087 608 572 852
Upstream Blk Time (%) 11 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 110 75 75 105 80
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 52 0 14 3 8 1 1 10 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 18 0 12 7 17 2 1 11 0
Intersection: 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr
Movement EB WB SB
Directions Served LT TR LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 316 333 270
Average Queue (ft) 97 89 71
95th Queue (ft) 243 238 208
Link Distance (ft) 731 906 1378
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln
Movement WB NB SB
Directions Served LR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 118 204 155
Average Queue (ft) 33 52 35
95th Queue (ft) 86 139 109
Link Distance (ft) 211 1378 384
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 67

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Without School Conditions 1: N State St & S Empire Rd/Ford Rd AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 189 19 36 32 20 32 19 281 40 31 457 100 Future Volume (veh/h) 189 19 36 32 20 32 19 281 40 31 457 100 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 222 22 42 38 24 38 22 331 47 36 538 118 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 444444444444
Cap, veh/h 275 115 220 60 52 82 38 809 114 57 781 171
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 566 1080 1753 640 1014 1753 3078 433 1753 2853 623 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 222 0 64 38 0 62 22 187 191 36 329 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 0 1646 1753 0 1654 1753 1749 1763 1753 1749 1727 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 0.0 1.4 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.5 3.8 3.8 0.9 7.2 7.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 1.4 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.5 3.8 3.8 0.9 7.2 7.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 275 0 335 60 0 134 38 459 463 57 479 473 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.19 0.64 0.00 0.46 0.58 0.41 0.41 0.63 0.69 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 287 0 384 737 0 309 778 1307 1317 819 1103 1089 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.4 0.0 14.1 20.4 0.0 18.8 20.8 13.0 13.1 20.5 13.9 13.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.8 0.0 0.1 4.2 0.0 0.9 5.2 0.2 0.2 4.2 0.7 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.2 1.3 1.3 0.4 2.3 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.2 0.0 14.2 24.6 0.0 19.7 26.0 13.2 13.3 24.7 14.6 14.6 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 286 100 400 692
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.4 21.6 14.0 15.1
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 16.2 6.5 13.7 5.9 16.7 11.7 8.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 19.0 27.0 7.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 5.8 2.9 3.4 2.5 9.3 7.2 3.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.6
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Without School Conditions 2: State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 58 64 20 57 47 34 268 18 43 407 81 Future Volume (veh/h) 58 58 64 20 57 47 34 268 18 43 407 81 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 73 81 25 72 59 43 339 23 54 515 103 Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 114 198 220 52 199 163 80 933 63 94 839 167
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 802 890 1767 942 772 1767 3351 226 1767 2929 583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 0 154 25 0 131 43 178 184 54 309 309 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1693 1767 0 1714 1767 1763 1814 1767 1763 1749 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 0.0 3.7 0.7 0.0 3.2 1.2 3.9 4.0 1.4 7.4 7.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 0.0 3.7 0.7 0.0 3.2 1.2 3.9 4.0 1.4 7.4 7.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.33
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 114 0 418 52 0 363 80 491 505 94 505 501 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.37 0.48 0.00 0.36 0.54 0.36 0.37 0.57 0.61 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 729 0 1048 547 0 884 547 1637 1685 547 1637 1625 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 0.0 15.1 23.1 0.0 16.3 22.6 14.0 14.0 22.4 15.0 15.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.8 0.0 0.5 6.7 0.0 0.6 5.5 0.4 0.4 5.4 1.2 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 1.3 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.6 1.4 1.5 0.7 2.7 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.0 0.0 15.7 29.8 0.0 16.9 28.1 14.5 14.5 27.8 16.2 16.2 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 227 156 405 672
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.6 19.0 15.9 17.1
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 18.5 5.9 17.0 6.7 18.9 7.6 15.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 45.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 6.0 2.7 5.7 3.2 9.4 4.0 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.3 0.0 0.9 0.0 4.3 0.1 0.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Without School Conditions
3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh12.4
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 58 51 66 104 24 49 84 55 50 118 39 Future Vol, veh/h 7 58 51 66 104 24 49 84 55 50 118 39
Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 44444444444
Mvmt Flow 10 85 75 97 153 35 72 124 81 74 174 57
Number of Lanes 1 10110111111
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 2
HCM Control Delay 12.8 13 11.5 12.3

HCM LOS B B B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 0% 53% 0% 81% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 47% 0% 19% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 49 84 55 7 109 66 128 50 118 39
LT Vol 49 0 0 7 0 66 0 50 0 0
Through Vol 0 84 0 0 58 0 104 0 118 0
RT Vol 0 0 55 0 51 0 24 0 0 39
Lane Flow Rate 72 124 81 10 160 97 188 74 174 57
Geometry Grp 8888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.153 0.245 0.144 0.022 0.311 0.203 0.361 0.154 0.34 0.101 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.637 7.127 6.413 7.81 6.976 7.53 6.896 7.559 7.05 6.336 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 470 504 559 459 516 479 525 475 510 565
Service Time 5.378 4.868 4.154 5.551 4.718 5.23 4.596 5.299 4.789 4.075 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.153 0.246 0.145 0.022 0.31 0.203 0.358 0.156 0.341 0.101 HCM Control Delay 11.8 12.2 10.2 10.7 12.9 12.1 13.4 11.7 13.4 9.8 HCM Lane LOS BBBBBBBBBA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1 0.5 0.1 1.3 0.8 1.6 0.5 1.5 0.3

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Without School Conditions
4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 48 70 18 54 33
Future Vol, veh/h 7 48 70 18 54 33
Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
Heavy Vehicles, % 10 10 10 10 10 10
Mvmt Flow 10 69 100 26 77 47
Number of Lanes 0 11010
Approach EB WB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 0 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8 8.1 8.2

HCM LOS A A A
Lane EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 13% 0% 62%
Vol Thru, % 87% 80% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 20% 38%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 55 88 87
LT Vol 7 0 54
Through Vol 48 70 0
RT Vol 0 18 33
Lane Flow Rate 79 126 124
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.099 0.151 0.153
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.523 4.327 4.434
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 795 832 812
Service Time 2.534 2.338 2.445
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.151 0.153
HCM Control Delay 8 8.1 8.2
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.5 0.5

HCM 6th TWSC Existing Without School Conditions
5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 1 23 3 7 80
Future Vol, veh/h 11 1 23 3 7 80
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 72 0220
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 74 74 74 74 74 74
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 55555
Mvmt Flow 15 1 31 4 9 108
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 165 107 0 0 37 0
Stage 1 35 -----
Stage 2 130 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 - - 4.15 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 - - 2.245 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 819 939 - - 1554 -
Stage 1 980 -----
Stage 2 889 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 809 873 - - 1551 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 809 -----
Stage 1 972 -----
Stage 2 885 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 814 1551 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.02 0.006 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 7.3 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -

HCM 6th TWSC Existing Without School Conditions
6: Despina Dr & S Empire Dr AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 3 14 9 7 56
Future Vol, veh/h 27 3 14 9 7 56
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 30880
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 74 74 74 74 74 74
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 55555
Mvmt Flow 36 4 19 12 9 76
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 135 36 0 0 39 0
Stage 1 33 -----
Stage 2 102 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 - - 4.15 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 - - 2.245 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 852 1028 - - 1552 -
Stage 1 982 -----
Stage 2 915 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 833 1017 - - 1540 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 833 -----
Stage 1 968 -----
Stage 2 908 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0.8

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 848 1540 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.048 0.006 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Without School Conditions 1: N State St & S Empire Rd/Ford Rd PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 202 39 38 96 46 70 56 662 125 42 519 114 Future Volume (veh/h) 202 39 38 96 46 70 56 662 125 42 519 114 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 220 42 41 104 50 76 61 720 136 46 564 124 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 239 153 150 134 78 119 80 969 183 66 917 201 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 857 837 1781 654 994 1781 2983 563 1781 2891 633 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 220 0 83 104 0 126 61 429 427 46 346 342 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1694 1781 0 1649 1781 1777 1769 1781 1777 1748 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 0.0 2.2 3.0 0.0 3.8 1.8 11.2 11.2 1.3 8.6 8.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 0.0 2.2 3.0 0.0 3.8 1.8 11.2 11.2 1.3 8.6 8.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 239 0 303 134 0 197 80 577 575 66 564 555 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.27 0.78 0.00 0.64 0.76 0.74 0.74 0.69 0.61 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 239 0 325 616 0 253 650 1092 1087 684 921 906 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.3 0.0 18.5 23.7 0.0 21.9 24.6 15.6 15.6 24.8 15.1 15.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 36.3 0.0 0.2 3.7 0.0 1.3 5.4 0.7 0.7 4.7 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.9 0.0 0.8 1.3 0.0 1.4 0.8 4.0 4.0 0.6 3.0 2.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.6 0.0 18.6 27.3 0.0 23.2 30.0 16.4 16.4 29.5 15.5 15.5 LnGrp LOS E A B C A C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 303 230 917 734
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.6 25.0 17.3 16.4
Approach LOS D C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.9 21.9 8.9 14.3 7.3 21.5 12.0 11.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 19.0 27.0 7.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 13.2 5.0 4.2 3.8 10.7 8.4 5.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Without School Conditions 2: State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 101 75 70 22 59 148 47 660 15 79 531 80 Future Volume (veh/h) 101 75 70 22 59 148 47 660 15 79 531 80 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 119 88 82 26 69 174 55 776 18 93 625 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 157 242 225 52 100 251 88 1147 27 122 1059 159 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 887 827 1781 467 1178 1781 3549 82 1781 3094 464 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 119 0 170 26 0 243 55 388 406 93 358 361 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1714 1781 0 1645 1781 1777 1854 1781 1777 1781 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 0.0 5.0 0.9 0.0 8.4 1.9 11.7 11.7 3.2 10.3 10.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 0.0 5.0 0.9 0.0 8.4 1.9 11.7 11.7 3.2 10.3 10.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.26
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 157 0 467 52 0 351 88 574 600 122 608 610 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.00 0.36 0.50 0.00 0.69 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.76 0.59 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 575 0 830 431 0 664 431 1291 1347 431 1291 1294 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.6 0.0 18.2 29.6 0.0 22.5 28.9 18.2 18.2 28.4 16.8 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.3 0.0 0.5 7.3 0.0 2.4 7.1 1.4 1.3 9.5 0.9 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 0.0 1.9 0.5 0.0 3.3 0.9 4.6 4.8 1.6 3.9 4.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.9 0.0 18.7 36.9 0.0 24.9 36.0 19.6 19.5 37.8 17.7 17.7 LnGrp LOS C A B D A C D B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 289 269 849 812
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.3 26.1 20.6 20.0
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 25.0 6.3 21.9 7.6 26.2 10.0 18.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 45.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 13.7 2.9 7.0 3.9 12.3 6.0 10.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 5.6 0.0 0.9 0.1 5.1 0.2 1.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.7
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Without School Conditions
3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.8
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 96 39 71 81 42 29 170 68 47 100 8 Future Vol, veh/h 29 96 39 71 81 42 29 170 68 47 100 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 35 117 48 87 99 51 35 207 83 57 122 10
Number of Lanes 1 10110111111
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 2
HCM Control Delay 11.9 11.6 12.1 11.5

HCM LOS B B B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 0% 71% 0% 66% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 29% 0% 34% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 29 170 68 29 135 71 123 47 100 8
LT Vol 29 0 0 29 0 71 0 47 0 0
Through Vol 0 170 0 0 96 0 81 0 100 0
RT Vol 0 0 68 0 39 0 42 0 0 8
Lane Flow Rate 35 207 83 35 165 87 150 57 122 10
Geometry Grp 8888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.07 0.38 0.135 0.072 0.301 0.173 0.269 0.118 0.233 0.017 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.102 6.594 5.882 7.294 6.589 7.205 6.463 7.396 6.887 6.175 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 502 543 605 489 542 495 552 482 518 575
Service Time 4.88 4.371 3.66 5.076 4.371 4.987 4.245 5.184 4.674 3.961 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.07 0.381 0.137 0.072 0.304 0.176 0.272 0.118 0.236 0.017 HCM Control Delay 10.4 13.4 9.6 10.6 12.2 11.5 11.6 11.2 11.8 9.1 HCM Lane LOS BBABBBBBBA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 1.8 0.5 0.2 1.3 0.6 1.1 0.4 0.9 0.1

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Without School Conditions
4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.3
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 32 46 42 31 9
Future Vol, veh/h 5 32 46 42 31 9
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 5 34 49 45 33 10
Number of Lanes 0 11010
Approach EB WB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 0 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.3 7.2 7.4

HCM LOS A A A
Lane EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 14% 0% 78%
Vol Thru, % 86% 52% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 48% 23%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 37 88 40
LT Vol 5 0 31
Through Vol 32 46 0
RT Vol 0 42 9
Lane Flow Rate 39 94 43
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.045 0.098 0.049
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.106 3.752 4.183
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 870 953 851
Service Time 2.141 1.782 2.23
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 0.099 0.051
HCM Control Delay 7.3 7.2 7.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.3 0.2

HCM 6th TWSC Existing Without School Conditions
5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 6 46 9 1 40
Future Vol, veh/h 1 6 46 9 1 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 21 124 0 21 21 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 1 7 52 10 1 45
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 146 202 0 0 83 0
Stage 1 78 -----
Stage 2 68 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 846 839 - - 1514 -
Stage 1 945 -----
Stage 2 955 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 811 725 - - 1484 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 811 -----
Stage 1 925 -----
Stage 2 936 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.9 0 0.2

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 736 1484 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.011 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.9 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -

HCM 6th TWSC Existing Without School Conditions
6: Despina Dr & S Empire Dr PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 6 36 17 9 27
Future Vol, veh/h 6 6 36 17 9 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 1 0 18 18 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 6 6 37 18 9 28
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 115 65 0 0 73 0
Stage 1 64 -----
Stage 2 51 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 881 999 - - 1527 -
Stage 1 959 -----
Stage 2 971 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 981 - - 1501 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 856 -----
Stage 1 937 -----
Stage 2 966 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9 0 1.9

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 914 1501 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.014 0.006 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -

Proposed Improvements

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions Signals/New Geometry 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 28 139 119 129 187 46 179 148 56 93 152 63 Future Volume (veh/h) 28 139 119 129 187 46 179 148 56 93 152 63 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 156 134 184 231 64 224 172 72 141 214 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.89 0.89 0.70 0.81 0.72 0.80 0.86 0.78 0.66 0.71 0.51 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 72 205 177 231 440 122 276 464 366 182 366
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.20 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 915 786 1781 1402 388 1781 1870 1473 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 0 290 184 0 295 224 172 72 141 214 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1701 1781 0 1791 1781 1870 1473 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 9.7 6.1 0.0 8.2 7.4 4.6 2.4 4.7 6.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 0.0 9.7 6.1 0.0 8.2 7.4 4.6 2.4 4.7 6.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 72 0 382 231 0 562 276 464 366 182 366 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.00 0.76 0.80 0.00 0.52 0.81 0.37 0.20 0.77 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 178 0 502 345 0 696 403 592 466 377 564 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.7 0.0 22.1 25.7 0.0 17.2 24.9 19.0 18.1 26.7 22.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.6 0.0 4.8 7.6 0.0 0.8 7.8 0.5 0.3 6.8 1.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 0.0 4.1 2.9 0.0 3.2 3.5 1.9 0.8 2.2 2.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.3 0.0 26.9 33.3 0.0 17.9 32.7 19.5 18.4 33.5 23.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A C C A B C B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 330 479 468 355 A
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.9 23.8 25.6 27.6
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.7 19.6 12.4 18.2 13.9 16.4 7.0 23.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s12.9 19.3 11.8 18.0 13.8 18.4 6.1 23.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.7 6.6 8.1 11.7 9.4 8.3 3.3 10.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.0 1.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions Signals/New Geometry 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr AM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 92 194 307 63 79 118
Future Volume (veh/h) 92 194 307 63 79 118
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 146 237 379 90 92 190
Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.82 0.81 0.70 0.86 0.62
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22200
Cap, veh/h 226 1057 494 117 125 258
Arrive On Green 0.13 0.57 0.34 0.34 0.24 0.24
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1449 344 522 1078
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 146 237 0 469 283 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1870 0 1793 1606 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 2.9 0.0 10.7 7.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 2.9 0.0 10.7 7.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 0.33 0.67
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 226 1057 0 611 384 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.22 0.00 0.77 0.74 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 701 2037 0 1072 730 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.1 5.0 0.0 13.5 16.2 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 0.1 0.0 2.1 2.8 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.5 0.7 0.0 3.9 2.7 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.2 5.1 0.0 15.6 18.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS C AABBA
Approach Vol, veh/h 383 469 283
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.6 15.6 18.9
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.5 15.5 10.3 20.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 50.1 20.9 18.1 27.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 9.5 5.6 12.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.7 0.3 2.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Intersection 3 AM Ex School]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
Demand Flows 95% Back of Queue
Cap. Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Average
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Total HV Veh Dist Block.
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: N Bush Street
Lane 1d 468 2.0 948 0.493 100 9.9 LOS A 3.4 86.5 Full 235 0.0 0.0 Approach 468 2.0 0.493 9.9 LOS A 3.4 86.5
East: Low Gap Road
Lane 1d 479 2.0 859 0.558 100 12.1 LOS B 4.8 120.9 Full 260 0.0 0.0 Approach 479 2.0 0.558 12.1 LOS B 4.8 120.9
North: N Bush Street
Lane 1d 355 2.0 768 0.462 100 11.0 LOS B 2.7 69.4 Full 125 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 124 2.0 768 0.161 100 6.4 LOS A 0.6 15.7 Full 125 0.0 0.0 Approach 479 2.0 0.462 9.8 LOS A 2.7 69.4
West: Low Gap Road
Lane 1d 330 2.0 768 0.430 100 10.3 LOS B 2.5 63.3 Full 170 0.0 0.0 Approach 330 2.0 0.430 10.3 LOS B 2.5 63.3
Intersection 1755 2.0 0.558 10.6 LOS B 4.8 120.9
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD SERVICES PTY LTD | Processed: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 1:23:09 PM Project: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\Sidra\Improvements.sip8

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Intersection 4 AM Ex School]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
Demand Flows 95% Back of Queue
Cap. Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Average
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Total HV Veh Dist Block.
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
East: Low Gap Road
Lane 1d 469 2.0 1161 0.404 100 7.2 LOS A 2.5 62.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 469 2.0 0.404 7.2 LOS A 2.5 62.5
North: Despina Drive
Lane 1d 282 2.0 910 0.310 100 7.3 LOS A 1.5 38.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 282 2.0 0.310 7.3 LOS A 1.5 38.3
West: Low Gap Road
Lane 1d 383 2.0 1227 0.312 100 5.8 LOS A 1.7 44.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 383 2.0 0.312 5.8 LOS A 1.7 44.4
Intersection 1134 2.0 0.404 6.8 LOS A 2.5 62.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD SERVICES PTY LTD | Processed: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 10:32:21 AM Project: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\Sidra\Improvements.sip8

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions Signal/New Geometry 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 164 124 79 158 49 113 172 82 69 148 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 164 124 79 158 49 113 172 82 69 148 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 208 163 93 226 57 138 239 99 111 176 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.54 0.79 0.76 0.85 0.70 0.86 0.82 0.72 0.83 0.62 0.84 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 93 271 212 122 435 110 179 445 342 144 408
Arrive On Green 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.22 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 938 735 1781 1425 359 1781 1870 1437 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 0 371 93 0 283 138 239 99 111 176 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1672 1781 0 1784 1781 1870 1437 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 11.3 2.8 0.0 7.3 4.2 6.2 3.1 3.4 4.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 11.3 2.8 0.0 7.3 4.2 6.2 3.1 3.4 4.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 93 0 483 122 0 544 179 445 342 144 408 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.00 0.77 0.76 0.00 0.52 0.77 0.54 0.29 0.77 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 218 0 678 241 0 746 337 758 582 305 725 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.7 0.0 18.1 25.4 0.0 15.9 24.4 18.5 17.3 25.0 18.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.2 0.0 3.5 9.3 0.0 0.8 6.9 1.0 0.5 8.4 0.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 0.0 4.3 1.4 0.0 2.8 2.0 2.6 1.0 1.7 1.9 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.9 0.0 21.5 34.7 0.0 16.7 31.3 19.5 17.8 33.4 19.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A C C A B C B B C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 427 376 476 287 A
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.9 21.2 22.6 24.8
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.0 17.7 8.3 20.5 10.1 16.6 7.4 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s9.5 22.5 7.5 22.5 10.5 21.5 6.8 23.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.4 8.2 4.8 13.3 6.2 6.5 3.7 9.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.5 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.7
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions Signal/New Geometry 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr PM Peak Hour
Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area Synchro 10 Report GHD
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 174 100 109 110 29
Future Volume (veh/h) 71 174 100 109 110 29
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.92
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 272 175 191 275 43
Peak Hour Factor 0.61 0.64 0.57 0.57 0.40 0.68
Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33300
Cap, veh/h 196 982 249 271 400 63
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.53 0.32 0.32 0.27 0.27
Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1856 782 853 1481 232
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 116 272 0 366 319 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1856 0 1635 1717 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 3.6 0.0 8.8 7.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 3.6 0.0 8.8 7.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.52 0.86 0.13
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 196 982 0 520 464 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.28 0.00 0.70 0.69 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 713 1906 0 856 953 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.0 5.8 0.0 13.4 14.7 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.2 0.0 1.8 1.8 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 1.0 0.0 2.9 2.8 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.8 6.0 0.0 15.2 16.5 0.0
LnGrp LOS C AABBA
Approach Vol, veh/h 388 366 319
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.7 15.2 16.5
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.3 16.6 9.5 18.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 46.1 24.9 18.1 23.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 9.5 4.8 10.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.7 0.9 0.2 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.0
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Intersection 3 PM Ex School]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
Demand Flows 95% Back of Queue
Cap. Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Average
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Total HV Veh Dist Block.
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: N Bush Street
Lane 1d 475 2.0 911 0.522 100 10.8 LOS B 4.1 103.2 Full 235 0.0 0.0 Approach 475 2.0 0.522 10.8 LOS B 4.1 103.2
East: Low Gap Road
Lane 1d 376 2.0 861 0.436 100 9.6 LOS A 2.6 65.9 Full 260 0.0 0.0 Approach 376 2.0 0.436 9.6 LOS A 2.6 65.9
North: N Bush Street
Lane 1d 287 2.0 889 0.323 100 7.6 LOS A 1.4 36.0 Full 125 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 36 2.0 889 0.041 100 4.4 LOS A 0.1 3.7 Full 125 0.0 0.0 Approach 324 2.0 0.323 7.2 LOS A 1.4 36.0
West: Low Gap Road
Lane 1d 426 2.0 900 0.474 100 9.9 LOS A 3.1 78.7 Full 170 0.0 0.0 Approach 426 2.0 0.474 9.9 LOS A 3.1 78.7
Intersection 1601 2.0 0.522 9.6 LOS A 4.1 103.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD SERVICES PTY LTD | Processed: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 1:19:35 PM Project: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\Sidra\Improvements.sip8

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Intersection 4 PM Ex School]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
Demand Flows 95% Back of Queue
Cap. Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Average
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Total HV Veh Dist Block.
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
East: Low Gap Road
Lane 1d 367 3.0 1184 0.310 100 5.9 LOS A 1.7 43.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 367 3.0 0.310 5.9 LOS A 1.7 43.2
North: Despina Drive
Lane 1d 318 3.0 1108 0.287 100 6.0 LOS A 1.5 37.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 318 3.0 0.287 6.0 LOS A 1.5 37.6
West: Low Gap Road
Lane 1d 388 3.0 997 0.389 100 7.8 LOS A 2.1 53.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 388 3.0 0.389 7.8 LOS A 2.1 53.8
Intersection 1073 3.0 0.389 6.6 LOS A 2.1 53.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD SERVICES PTY LTD | Processed: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 10:31:51 AM Project: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\Sidra\Improvements.sip8

Appendix D: Design Recommendations

0 1 inch = ft. 100' 100' 100 LOW GAP ROAD IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT ROUNDABOUTS DESPINA DRIVE LOW GAP ROAD Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX001.dwg Plot Date: 20 December 2019 - 3:01 PM Date Report No. City of Ukiah Project No. Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.19.19 Source: FIGURE D1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
N RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON LOW GAP ROAD N. BUSH STREET 6' BIKE LANE 3' STRIPED BUFFER 6' BIKE LANE 3' STRIPED BUFFER N. PINE STREET CURB RAMP (TYP) RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON

0 1 inch = ft. 50' 50' 50 INTERSECTION #3 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT N NORTH BUSH STREET NORTH PINE STREET Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX001.dwg Plot Date: 20 December 2019 - 11:13 AM Date Report No. City of Ukiah Project No. Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.12.19 Source: FIGURE D2 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE LOW GAP ROAD 10' MULTI-USE PATH BIKE RAMP (TYP) CURB RAMP (TYP) 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER CENTRAL ISLAND TRUCK APRON 10' MULTI-USE PATH 10' MULTI-USE PATH 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH RAISED SLITTER ISLAND (TYP) R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 20' 20'

0 1 inch = ft. 50' 50' 50 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT N

DESPINA DRIVE
LOW GAP ROAD Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX001.dwg Plot Date: 20 December 2019 - 2:39 PM Date Report No. City of Ukiah Project No. Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.19.19 Source: FIGURE D3 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS LOW GAP ROAD 8' MULTI-USE PATH BIKE RAMP (TYP) CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER CENTRAL ISLAND TRUCK APRON 10' MULTI-USE PATH5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH RAISED SLITTER ISLAND (TYP) R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 20' 20' STAIRS RETAINING WALL NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE RETAINING WALL

STOP STOP STOP
11'
6'
11'
3'
6'
11'
10'
11'
3'
6'
3' 8'5' 11' 11' 5' 8' BIOSWALE (TYP) LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 6' SIDEWALK R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' R=20' R=20' VALLEY GUTTER 0 1 inch = ft. 40' 40' 40 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS N

DESPINA DRIVE
LOW GAP ROAD Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. City of Ukiah Project No. Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.24.19 Source: FIGURE D4 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE

11'
6'
11'
3'
6'
11'
10'
11'
3'
6'
3' 8'5' 11' 11' 5' 8' BIOSWALE (TYP) LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 6' SIDEWALK R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' R=20' R=20' VALLEY GUTTER 0 1 inch = ft. 40' 40' 40 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS / TRAFFIC SIGNAL N

DESPINA DRIVE
LOW GAP ROAD Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. City of Ukiah Project No. Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.19.19 Source: FIGURE D5 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE

STOP
STOP STOP 8' 5' 11' 11' 5'8'
22' 22' 8'5' 11' 11'5' 8' RETAINING CURB & FENCE5% 5% 5% 5% LANDING (TYP)30' 10' CONCRETE PATH 5' SIDEWALK 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 10' 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) DRAINAGE TUBE R=15' R/W R/W R/W 0 1 inch = ft. 40' 40' 40 INTERSECTION #5 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS N

DESPINA DRIVE
CAPPS LANE Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. City of Ukiah Project No. Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.24.19 Source: FIGURE D6 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE

Appendix E: Signal Timing

INTERSECTION: Page 1 (of 5)
Group Assignment: N/S Street Name: State Street Last Database Change:

Field Master Assignment: E/W Street Name: Despina Drive/Low Gap Road System Reference Number:

Notes: Phase 7 is a ped only phase for the N-S Peds
Change By Date By Date
Drop Number <C+0+0>Zone Number <C+0+1>Area Number <C+0+2> Max Initial <F+0+E>Area Address <C+0+3> <C+A+1> Red Revert <F+0+F>QuicNet Channel (QuicNet) <C+B+1> All Red Start <F+C+0> Communication Addresses Manual Selection Start / Revert Times Column Numbers ----> 12345678 E
Row Phase Names ----> EB SB Ped WB Row
0 Ped Walk 77 RR-1 Delay Permit 0
1 Ped FDW 17 21 RR-1 Clear Red Lock 12 Min Green 868 EV-A Delay Yellow Lock 23 Type 3 Limit EV-A Clear Min Recall 34 Added Initial EV-B Delay Ped Recall 45 Veh Extension 2.5 2.0 2.5 EV-B Clear View Set Peds 5 6 Max Gap 3.0 2.5 3.0 EV-C Delay Rest In Walk 67 Min Gap 2.5 2.0 2.5 EV-C Clear Red Rest 78 Max Limit 30.0 30.0 35.0 EV-D Delay Dual Entry 89 Max Limit 2 EV-D Clear Max Recall 9 A RR-2 Delay Soft Recall A
B Call To Phase RR-2 Clear Max 2 B
C Reduce By 0.0 0.0 0.0 View EV Delay - - - Cond. Service C D Reduce Every 0.0 0.0 0.0 View EV Clear - - - Man Cntrl Calls D E Yellow Change 3.6 3.6 3.6 View RR Delay - - - Yellow Start E F Red Clear 1.0 1.0 1.0 View RR Clear - - - First Phases F Phase Timing - Bank 1 <F Page> Preempt Timing Phase Functions <F Page> Manual Offset 0 = Automatic 1 = Offset A 2 = Offset B 3 = Offset C Change
- - - - -
Manual Plan 0 = Automatic1-9 = Plan 1-9 14 = Free 15 = Flash Change Record
F
Phase
Manual Plan
6 Manual Offset
Printed on 12/16/2019 3:02 PM Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Revision: 10313 - Stand Alone

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

ROUNDABOUT DESIGN AT LOW GAP ROAD

AND NORTH BUSH STREET
Request Date: May 15, 2024
Deadline for Responses: June 12, 2024, 5:00 P.M. (PST)
ATTACHMENT 2

City of Ukiah Page 2
Request for Proposals - Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street

CITY OF UKIAH
Request for Proposal (RFP) – Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street

1.0 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
The City of Ukiah's Public Works Department invites qualified engineering firms with proven expertise in roundabout design to submit proposals for the redesign of the intersection at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street. The existing 4-way stop intersection will be replaced with a roundabout to improve traffic flow, enhance safety, and provide a more efficient intersection configuration.

The project is allocated a budget of $263,000, generously provided by Caltrans. This funding is intended to cover various aspects of the project, with a specific portion earmarked for the design phase. The City of Ukiah seeks proposals that align with the available budget and demonstrate an understanding of efficient fund utilization, especially concerning the design requirements.

Qualified engineering firms are encouraged to present innovative and cost-effective solutions that maximize the impact of the allocated funds. Proposals should clearly outline how the design phase will be executed within the specified budget, ensuring transparency and accountability in financial planning.

2.0 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
The schedule for this procurement is as follows:

Distribute Request for Proposals: May 15, 2024
Deadline for Responses: June 12, 2024, 5:00 P.M. (Pacific Time) City Evaluation of Proposals: By June 21, 2024
Interviews (if necessary) By June 28, 2024
City Council approval requested
for recommended firm: July 3, 2024
The City must receive proposals no later than the time and date specified above. Those proposals received after this date and time will not be considered. Proposals will only be accepted electronically.

Send your proposals to the following:

Mary Horger
Financial Services Manager
City of Ukiah
[email protected]
Acceptable forms of electronic delivery are emailing the proposal directly, or providing a link to the documents for download, as long as the email is received by the established deadline. It is highly recommended to request a delivery receipt with the email to confirm that it has been received.

3.0 SCOPE OF WORK
All services shall be provided in accordance with the following attachments: Attachment A – City of Ukiah Insurance Requirements; Attachment B – City of Ukiah Professional Services Agreement.

The scope of services for the project shall include tasks described below, as well as other elements or modifications which may be suggested by consultants presenting proposals to better meet the needs of the City. In collaboration with the City, the selected firm will perform the following key services:

City of Ukiah Page 3
Request for Proposals - Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street

1. Project Overview:
a. Provide a detailed description of the project, emphasizing the need for a roundabout at the North Bush Street and Low Gap Road intersection in Ukiah, California. b. Highlight the project's goals, including improving traffic flow, enhancing safety, and minimizing environmental impact.

2. Site Analysis:
a. Conduct a thorough analysis of the existing intersection, considering traffic patterns, pedestrian and cyclist movements, and adjacent land uses. b. Identify potential challenges, such as existing utilities, drainage issues, and environmental constraints.

3. Design Criteria:
a. Specify design criteria in accordance with local, state, and federal standards for roundabout construction.
b. Consider aesthetic elements, landscaping, and public art opportunities to enhance the roundabout's visual appeal.

4. Traffic Analysis:
a. Perform a comprehensive traffic analysis, projecting future traffic volumes and assessing the impact of the proposed roundabout on traffic operations. b. Consider peak hours, school zones, and special events in the traffic analysis.

5. Geometric Design:
a. Develop detailed geometric design plans for the roundabout, including lane configurations, radii, crosswalks, and splitter islands.
b. Ensure ADA-compliant pedestrian facilities and safe accommodations for cyclists.

6. Drainage and Utilities:
a. Assess the existing drainage conditions and propose a stormwater management plan. b. Coordinate with utility providers to identify and address potential conflicts and relocations.

7. Environmental Considerations:
a. Consider sustainable design practices and incorporate green infrastructure where applicable.

8. Public Outreach:
a. Develop a public outreach plan to keep the community informed about the project's progress and gather feedback.
b. Organize public meetings and workshops to address concerns and build support for the roundabout.

9. Project Schedule:
a. Provide a detailed project timeline, outlining key milestones, deliverables, and anticipated completion dates.
b. Include a phased approach to construction, if applicable.

10. Budget Estimate:
a. Present a preliminary cost estimate for the design phase, including engineering fees, surveying, and any additional services required.
b. Clearly define the scope of services covered by the proposed budget.

11. Qualifications and Experience:
a. Outline the qualifications and relevant experience of the engineering firm, emphasizing past successful roundabout projects.
b. Include resumes of key personnel who will be involved in the project.

12. Project Meetings:
a. Specify the frequency and format of project meetings, such as weekly, bi-weekly, or as needed.

City of Ukiah Page 4
Request for Proposals - Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street b. Clarify the purpose of each meeting, including progress updates, issue resolution, and coordination with stakeholders.
c. Indicate the preferred location of meetings, whether in-person, virtual, or a combination, considering potential travel constraints.
d. Highlight the importance of attendance by key project team members, including engineers, project managers, and relevant stakeholders.

Deliverables and Project Review Meetings:

1. Conceptual Design Plans:
a. Initial concepts to be submitted at 30% design phase.

2. Phased Final Design Plans:
a. Detailed design plans to be submitted in three phases: a. i. 30% Design Phase: Preliminary plans for review and feedback. ii. 60% Design Phase: Intermediate plans incorporating feedback and detailing design elements further.
iii. 100% Design Phase: Finalized plans reflecting all revisions and ready for approval.

3. Specifications Document:
a. Specifications to be submitted concurrently with the 60% Design Phase.

4. Engineer's Estimate:
a. Cost estimates to be submitted at each design phase: a. Preliminary estimate at the 30% Design Phase. b. Revised estimate at the 60% Design Phase. c. Finalized estimate at the 100% Design Phase.

5. Traffic Control Plans:
a. Submit plans at the 60% Design Phase, incorporating feedback from the initial submission.

6. Public Outreach Materials:
a. Regular updates on public outreach activities to be included in progress reports.

7. As-Built Drawings:
a. Initial as-built drawings submitted after construction completion for review.

8. Closeout Documentation:
a. Documentation to be submitted within 30 days of project completion.

When submitting deliverables, provide three printed sets of plans and specifications, along with one electronic copy in PDF format. Include AutoCAD files for the plan sheets.

Project Review Meetings:
o A project review meeting will be scheduled after the submission of deliverables at each design phase.
o Meetings will provide an opportunity for the engineering firm to present and discuss their progress, address any concerns, and receive feedback.
o Key project team members, stakeholders, and relevant city representatives are expected to attend these review meetings.

By adhering to these guidelines, we aim to select an engineering firm that will deliver a high-quality roundabout design to enhance traffic flow and safety at the North Bush Street and Low Gap Road intersection in Ukiah, California.

City of Ukiah Page 5
Request for Proposals - Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street

4.0 REQUIRED PROPOSAL CONTENT
Firms interested in providing the services described in the section above must submit a proposal responding to all the questions below and providing all information requested in a format that mirrors the RFP by section and order listed. Proposals shall include at a minimum:

A. Cover Letter
The cover letter should contain the name, address, and brief history of the firm. The cover letter must be signed by an official authorized to bind the successful firm contractually and shall contain a statement to the effect that the proposal is a firm offer for a minimum period of sixty (60) days after the submittal date. The letter shall also provide the name, title, address, and telephone number of individuals with the authority to negotiate a contract and bind the consultant to the terms of the contract.

B. Project Understanding and Proposed Approach
Describe your firm’s understanding of the project and how your firm intends to structure the project approach.

C. Project Team
Identify the key personnel to be assigned to this project, including the qualifications and experience as related to the project. Resumes for each of the key personnel are to be provided. Identify any sub-consultants/subcontractors that will be used, including their qualifications and experience, as well as the work they will accomplish. Staff proposed to be in charge of the project must demonstrate significant experience supervising similar work. Describe the proposed organizational structure between consultant and sub-consultants/subcontractors, including current and previous work assignments.

D. Experience and References
Provide descriptions of related project experience for at least three similar projects on which the firm has performed work over the past ten years. For the sub-consultants/subcontractors that will be used for more than 10% of the project budget, provide the same detail. Each project description shall be limited to a maximum of 4 pages, including project images and must provide client references and client contact information.

E. Fee Proposal
Provide a separate fee proposal document based on an hourly rate schedule with a “not to exceed” maximum cost for the work identified in the Scope of Services. Provide a tabulation of the project staff and number of work hours for each task. Indicate if travel time, mileage, and per diem will be charged. Include any sub-consultant cost. Additionally, please identify miscellaneous costs associated with this proposal. Submit a copy of your firm’s current itemized hourly rate fee schedule.

F. Proposed Project Schedule
Provide a proposed schedule of completion for each task and list of task deliverables.

G. Exceptions
Identify any exceptions you are proposing with respect to the Scope of Services. Additionally, if there are any exceptions to the City’s insurance requirements and/or the City’s draft professional services agreement as shown in the attachments, the Consultant should list the exceptions in the proposal.

City of Ukiah Page 6
Request for Proposals - Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street

5.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION
The following evaluation criteria will be used in evaluating and selecting candidates:

A. Demonstration of understanding of the project. (30 points) B. Clarity of submittal and responsiveness to the RFP. (20 points) C. Qualifications, competence, technical ability and relevant experience of specific personnel identified by the consultant. (30 points)
D. Quality of consultant’s related work experience: experience with similar projects, experience with preparation of construction plans and specifications for a government agency, cost estimates, and permitting. (20 points)
The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. The City reserves the right to award a contract to the firm that presents the proposal, which in the sole judgment of the City best serves the City’s interest. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive minor irregularities in said proposals, and/or negotiate minor deviations with the successful firm.

6.0 CONTACT PERSON
Please contact Mary Horger if you have questions or require additional information. Questions must be submitted in writing via email. Contact information can be found below.

Mary Horger
Financial Services Manager
City of Ukiah
[email protected]
Communication between a proposing company and a member of the City staff, other than the designated contact person, or between a proposing company and a non-designated City representative regarding the selection of a proposing company or award of this contract is explicitly prohibited from the time the RFP is advertised until the selection of a proposing company or award of the contract.

Questions pertaining to this RFP shall be addressed to the party specified above. Failure of a proposing company, or any of its representatives, to comply with this paragraph will result in their proposal being rejected.

7.0 ADDENDA
If it becomes necessary to revise any part of this Request for Proposal after it has been released, the City will issue an addendum containing the revision. All addenda will be posted on the City’s website at www.cityofukiah.com/purchasing with the rest of the documents. Anyone who intends to submit a proposal in response to this solicitation must check the website frequently for any posted addenda.

Anyone submitting a proposal will be deemed to have seen and agreed to be bound by the posted addenda.

8.0 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Provided as Attachment “A” are the City’s complete insurance requirements. Awarded firm, prior to performing any work, shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance per the attached requirements.

9.0 CITY BUSINESS LICENSE
Awarded firm will be required to maintain a City business license for the duration of the contract.

Information regarding the City business license can be found on the City website, at www.cityofukiah.com/businesses.

City of Ukiah Page 7
Request for Proposals - Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street

10.0 PUBLIC RECORDS
All materials submitted in response to this RFP are property of the City and will not be returned. The materials will be a public record subject to the disclosure provisions of the California Public Records Act and any other related public law or provision of such laws.

11.0 FINANCIAL RESPONSIBLITY
The City accepts no financial responsibility for any costs incurred by a firm in responding to this RFP.

Submissions will become the property of the City and may be used by the City in any way deemed appropriate.

Attachment A - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSULTANTS
Consultant(s) shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant(s), his agents, representatives, or employees.

I. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

A. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Form No. CG 20 10 10 01 and Commercial General Liability – Completed Operations Form No. CG 20 37 10 01).

B. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).

C. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance.

D. Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant’s profession. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability.

II. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:

A. General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage including operations, products and completed operations, as applicable. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Insurance must be written on an occurrence basis.

B. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Insurance must be written on an occurrence basis.

C. Workman’s Compensation Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

D. Errors and Omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. If written on a claims-made basis, insurance coverage must cover claims filed within 3 years after contract work completed.

III. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the insurer to reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant to provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses; or to approve the deductible without a guarantee.

IV. REQUIRED Insurance Provisions
Proof of general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

A. The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as ADDITIONAL INSURED with respect to liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the contractor; and with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts or equipment, furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance, or as a separate owner’s policy.

B. The workers’ compensation policy is to be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation. The insurance company, in its endorsement, agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arises from the work performed by the named insured for the City. NOTE: You cannot be added as an additional insured on a workers’ compensation policy.

C. For any claims related to this project, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

D. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.

V. RATING - Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with admitted California insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A- for financial strength, AA for long-term credit rating and AMB-1 for short-term credit rating.

VI. Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements should be on forms provided by the City. If endorsements are on forms other than the City’s forms, those endorsements must provide coverage that is equivalent to or better than the forms requested by the City. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications at any time.

If you have questions regarding our insurance requirements contact:

Risk Manager
(707) 463-6287 or FAX (707) 463-6204
Revised: 11/20/08

COU No. ______________

ATTACHMENT B -

AGREEMENT FOR

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
[Design Professional]
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 2008 (“Effective Date”), by and between CITY OF UKIAH, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "City" and _________________, a _____________ [sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, etc] organized and in good standing under the laws of the state of ______________, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".

RECITALS
This Agreement is predicated on the following facts:
a. City requires consulting services related to ________________________________. b. Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, skills, experience and properly licensed to provide these services, and is willing to provide them according to the terms of this Agreement.
c. City and Consultant agree upon the Scope-of-Work and Work Schedule attached hereto as Attachment "A", describing contract provisions for the project and setting forth the completion dates for the various services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement.

TERMS OF AGREEMENT

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

1.1 The Project is described in detail in the attached Scope-of-Work (Attachment "A").

2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.1 As set forth in Attachment "A".

2.2. Additional Services. Additional services, if any, shall only proceed upon written agreement between City and Consultant. The written Agreement shall be in the form of an Amendment to this Agreement.

3.0 CONDUCT OF WORK

3.1 Time of Completion. Consultant shall commence performance of services as required by the Scope-of-Work upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from City and shall complete such services within ________________ from receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Consultant shall complete the work to the City's reasonable satisfaction, even if contract disputes arise or Consultant contends it is entitled to further compensation.

4.0 COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES

4.1 Basis for Compensation. For the performance of the professional services of this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed maximum dollar amount of $-------. Labor charges shall be based upon hourly billing rates for the various classifications of personnel employed by Consultant to perform the Scope of Work as set forth in the attached Attachment B, which shall include all indirect costs and expenses

DRAFT AGREEMENT
PAGE 2 OF 7
of every kind or nature, except direct expenses. The direct expenses and the fees to be charged for same shall be as set forth in Attachment B. Consultant shall complete the Scope of Work for the not-to-exceed guaranteed maximum, even if actual time and expenses exceed that amount.

4.2 Changes. Should changes in compensation be required because of changes to the Scope-ofWork of this Agreement, the parties shall agree in writing to any changes in compensation. "Changes to the Scope-of-Work" means different activities than those described in Attachment "A" and not additional time to complete those activities than the parties anticipated on the date they entered this Agreement.

4.3 Sub-contractor Payment. The use of sub-consultants or other services to perform a portion of the work of this Agreement shall be approved by City prior to commencement of work. The cost of sub-consultants shall be included within guaranteed not-to-exceed amount set forth in Section 4.1.

4.4 Terms of Payment. Payment to Consultant for services rendered in accordance with this contract shall be based upon submission of monthly invoices for the work satisfactorily performed prior to the date of invoice less any amount already paid to Consultant, which amounts shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after receipt by City. The invoices shall provide a description of each item of work performed, the time expended to perform each task, the fees charged for that task, and the direct expenses incurred and billed for. Invoices shall be accompanied by documentation sufficient to enable City to determine progress made and the expenses claimed.

5.0 ASSURANCES OF CONSULTANT

5.1 Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor and is solely responsible for its acts or omissions. Consultant (including its agents, servants, and employees) is not City's agent, employee, or representative for any purpose.

It is the express intention of the parties hereto that Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee, joint venturer, or partner of City for any purpose whatsoever. City shall have no right to, and shall not control the manner or prescribe the method of accomplishing those services contracted to and performed by Consultant under this Agreement, and the general public and all governmental agencies regulating such activity shall be so informed.

Those provisions of this Agreement that reserve ultimate authority in City have been inserted solely to achieve compliance with federal and state laws, rules, regulations, and interpretations thereof. No such provisions and no other provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between Consultant and City.

Consultant shall pay all estimated and actual federal and state income and self-employment taxes that are due the state and federal government and shall furnish and pay worker's compensation insurance, unemployment insurance and any other benefits required by law for himself and his employees, if any. Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold City and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any claims or demands by federal, state or local government agencies for any such taxes or benefits due but not paid by Consultant, including the legal costs associated with defending against any audit, claim, demand or law suit.

DRAFT AGREEMENT
PAGE 3 OF 7
Consultant warrants and represents that it is a properly licensed professional or professional organization with a substantial investment in its business and that it maintains its own offices and staff which it will use in performing under this Agreement.

5.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibility is solely to City.

Consultant has no interest and will not acquire any direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of the Agreement. Consultant shall not in the performance of this Agreement employ a person having such an interest. If the City Manager determines that the Consultant has a disclosure obligation under the City’s local conflict of interest code, the Consultant shall file the required disclosure form with the City Clerk within 10 days of being notified of the City Manager’s determination.

6.0 INDEMNIFICATION

6.1 Insurance Liability. Without limiting Consultant's obligations arising under Paragraph 6.2 Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreement until it procures and maintains for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with its performance under this Agreement.

A. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office ("ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form No. CG 20 10 10 01 and Commercial General Liability Coverage – Completed Operations Form No. CG 20 37 10 01.

2. ISO Form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 "any auto" or Code 8, 9 if no owned autos and endorsement CA 0025.

3. Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance.

4. Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant’s profession. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability.

B. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:

1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage including operations, products and completed operations. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work performed under this Agreement, or the aggregate limit shall be twice the prescribed per occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

DRAFT AGREEMENT
PAGE 4 OF 7

3. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability: Worker's compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.

4. Errors and Omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.

C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

D. Other Insurance Provisions
The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages a. The City, it officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects; liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, products and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, hired or borrowed by the Consultant for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope-of-protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
b. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers.

Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
d. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

2. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from Consultant's performance of the work, pursuant to this Agreement.

DRAFT AGREEMENT
PAGE 5 OF 7

3. Professional Liability Coverage
If written on a claims-made basis, the retroactivity date shall be the effective date of this Agreement. The policy period shall extend from ------ to ------------.

4. All Coverages
Each Insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.

E. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with admitted California insurers with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- for financial strength, AA for long-term credit rating and AMB-1 for short-term credit rating.

F. Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with Certificates of Insurance and with original Endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement. The Certificates and Endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The Certificates and Endorsements are to be on forms provided or approved by the City. All Certificates and Endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before Consultant begins the work of this Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. If Consultant fails to provide the coverages required herein, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase any or all of them. In that event, after notice to Consultant that City has paid the premium, the cost of insurance may be deducted from the compensation otherwise due the contractor under the terms of this Contract.

G. Subcontractors
Consultant shall include all sub-contractors or sub-consultants as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each sub-contractor or sub-consultant. All coverage for sub-contractors or sub-consultants shall be subject to all insurance requirements set forth in this Paragraph 6.1.

6.2 Indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing insurance requirements, and in addition thereto, Consultant agrees, for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement, to indemnify the City for any claim, cost or liability that arises out of, or pertains to, or relates to any negligent act or omission or the willful misconduct of Consultant and its agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design by the City, or arising from the active negligence of the City.
“Indemnify,” as used herein includes the expenses of defending against a claim and the payment of any settlement or judgment arising out of the claim. Defense costs include all costs associated with defending the claim, including, but not limited to, the fees of attorneys, investigators, consultants, experts and expert witnesses, and litigation expenses.

DRAFT AGREEMENT
PAGE 6 OF 7
References in this paragraph to City or Consultant, include their officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors.

7.0 CONTRACT PROVISIONS

7.1 Documents and Ownership of Work. All documents furnished to Consultant by City and all documents or reports and supportive data prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are owned and become the property of the City upon their creation and shall be given to City immediately upon demand and at the completion of Consultant's services at no additional cost to City. Deliverables are identified in the Scope-of-Work, Attachment "A". All documents produced by Consultant shall be furnished to City in digital format and hardcopy. Consultant shall produce the digital format, using software and media approved by City.

7.2 Governing Law. Consultant shall comply with the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, and all local governments having jurisdiction over this Agreement. The interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by California law and any action arising under or in connection with this Agreement must be filed in a Court of competent jurisdiction in Mendocino County.

7.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement plus its Attachment(s) and executed Amendments set forth the entire understanding between the parties.

7.4 Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect.

7.5 Modification. No modification of this Agreement is valid unless made with the agreement of both parties in writing.

7.6 Assignment. Consultant's services are considered unique and personal. Consultant shall not assign, transfer, or sub-contract its interest or obligation under all or any portion of this Agreement without City's prior written consent.

7.7 Waiver. No waiver of a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement shall be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach of the same or any other covenant, term or condition or a waiver of the covenant, term or condition itself.

7.8 Termination. This Agreement may only be terminated by either party: 1) for breach of the Agreement; 2) because funds are no longer available to pay Consultant for services provided under this Agreement; or 3) City has abandoned and does not wish to complete the project for which Consultant was retained. A party shall notify the other party of any alleged breach of the Agreement and of the action required to cure the breach. If the breaching party fails to cure the breach within the time specified in the notice, the contract shall be terminated as of that time. If terminated for lack of funds or abandonment of the project, the contract shall terminate on the date notice of termination is given to Consultant. City shall pay the Consultant only for services performed and expenses incurred as of the effective termination date. In such event, as a condition to payment, Consultant shall provide to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder, subject to off-set for any direct or consequential damages City may incur as a result of Consultant's breach of contract.

DRAFT AGREEMENT
PAGE 7 OF 7

7.9 Execution of Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each bearing the original signature of the parties. Alternatively, this Agreement may be executed and delivered by facsimile or other electronic transmission, and in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. When executed using either alternative, the executed agreement shall be deemed an original admissible as evidence in any administrative or judicial proceeding to prove the terms and content of this Agreement.

8.0 NOTICES
Any notice given under this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed given when personally delivered or deposited in the mail (certified or registered) addressed to the parties as follows:

CITY OF UKIAH --------------
DEPT. OF_____________ --------------
300 SEMINARY AVENUE --------------
UKIAH, CALIFORNIA 95482-5400

9.0 SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the Effective Date:

CONSULTANT
BY: __________________________ ____________________
Date
PRINT NAME: _________________
__________________
IRS IDN Number

CITY OF UKIAH
BY: ____________________
Date

CITY MANAGER
ATTEST
____________________
CITY CLERK Date

City of Ukiah

PROPOSAL FOR
DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES: ROUNDABOUT DESIGN

AT LOW GAP ROAD AND NORTH BUSH STREET
JUNE 12, 2024
ATTACHMENT 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER LETTER ....................................................................................................................................................1 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH ................................................................... 3 PROJECT TEAM ................................................................................................................................................. 11 EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES...................................................................................................................17 PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE................................................................................................................23 EXCEPTIONS .....................................................................................................................................................24

COVER LETTER
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 1
June 12, 2024
Mary Horger
Financial Services Manager
City of Ukiah
[email protected]
Submitted via email
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS -

ROUNDABOUT DESIGN AT LOW GAP ROAD AND NORTH BUSH STREET Dear Ms. Horger and the Selection Committee:

Traffic congestion, particulary during the morning rush-hour, can be a frustrating experience for motorists.

Traditional traffic flow improvements such as wider roadways and increased speeds may relieve congestion, but can come at the detriment of pedestrian safety. In pedestrian-centric areas, such as near school zones and residential area, a thoughtful and balanced approach to increasing motorist efficiency while enhancing pedestrian safety needs to be prioritized. The Low Gap Road and North Bush Street intersection would benefit from strategic improvements to both traffic flow and pedestrian circulation improvements, and we believe that we have the right team to development the thoughtful and balanced approach to make this intersection improvement project a success for all users!
BKF Engineers (BKF) welcomes this opportunity to submit our proposal to support the City of Ukiah with the design of a “mini” roundabout at the Low Gap Road and North Bush Street intersection. BKF’s Santa Rosa office is one of 16 offices strategically located across California, serving both our pubic and private clients with the local touch they deserve. Understanding our client’s needs is the cornerstone of our corporate culture. The foundation of our success stems from our ability to tailor our approach to each unique situation, and deliver project results that match or exceed our client’s expectations.

While each project is truly unique, many contain the same core building blocks. We’ve stacked these blocks in creative and effective ways, creating a history of successfully projects over the last several years. We have a portfolio of satisfied municipal clients and beautiful, functional projects, including past projects with the City of Ukiah. Within our proposal we have highlighted some recent similar project experiences, and would be excited to expand on our project expertise, if requested.

BKF has teamed W-Trans, a local and Woman-Owned company familiar to City of Ukiah staff, to support the roundabout analysis, geometric design, and striping and lighting improvements. Our project team will be managed by Becky Dower, PE, who brings over 15 years of experience delivering successful transportation projects for our Public Works clients. Becky has collaborated with City staff during the last 4 years on our other various ventures with the City, and is excited to leverage our learned experiences to accelerate this mini roundabout project forward.

Additionally, our strong and lasting professional relationship with a number of additional consulting firms can be leveraged, if needed, to provide the City with the expertise needed to navigate the foreseeable project challenges.

Additional optional team members that we can staff the project with include WRA, Inc., for environmental entitlements and permitting support, RGH Consultants for geotechnical investigation and pavement design recommendations, and AIM, Inc., to expand on our public outreach offering if a more robust engagement is determined to be valuable. Additionally, we have included on our team both Integra+, for landscape design and public art implementation, and Bender Rosenthal, Inc., to facilitate easement and right-of-way acquisitions. We have all worked together on similar projects, and each bring relevant past project experience to the team.

Among our over 500 employees, we also have a wide array of in-house service offerings. For this project we have identify optional services that include Underground Utility Locating services, Right-of-Way Surveying, and Construction Administration Support, should these services be needed. Most notably, BKF would like to extend the services related to Grant and Funding Support, to help the City identify and apply for additional design and construction funding, should the City identify a budgetary shortfall with the current allocated funds.

COVER LETTER
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 2
We have reviewed and previously executed a Professional Consulting Services Agreement with the City of Ukiah and are confident we can successfully negotiate the terms of the agreement. This proposal is a firm offer that is valid for sixty (60) days following today’s date.

We have allocated adequate staff resources to meet the demands of the project and are ready to dedicate these resources once we are selected to support the City with this project. As Principal, I am authorized to bind the firm contractually. I speak for all of BKF and our sub-consultant partners when I say we are excited to have the opportunity to continue to support the City of Ukiah with projects that benefit the community.

We appreciate your review of our proposal. Please feel free to reach out to us to discuss our approach, the project opportunities, or to request additional information.

Sincerely,

BKF ENGINEERS
Jason Kirchmann, PE, PLS
Principal/Executive in Charge

LOCAL OFFICE
BKF Engineers
200 Fourth Street, Suite 300,
Santa Rosa, CA 95401
Ph. (707) 583-8500

INDIVIDUAL AUTHORIZED TO

NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT
Jason Kirchmann, PE, PLS
Principal/Vice President
Ph. (707) 583-8515
[email protected]

FIRM INFORMATION

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 3

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
Given our team’s experience with similar roundabout intersection improvement projects, we understand the importance of this project and the benefit that this new mini roundabout will bring the City. We are excited to partner with the City on another project to provide a safe, efficient, and aesthetically pleasing transportation facility that meets the needs of the community and promotes sustainable transportation practices.

BKF will take a comprehensive approach to identifying and defining the critical design issues that we may encounter as we explore and design a mini roundabout at the Low Gap Road and North Bush Street intersection.

This skewed, four-way stop-controlled intersection with a free right-turn/right slip lane for southbound traffic presents interesting geometry for a mini roundabout, whose features may need to include an elliptical center circle, as opposed to a more traditional round center circle. Additionally, our review of the project site has identified the following constraints and opportunities that we will consider as the new intersection improvements are developed:
▪ Several public transit stops are located near the intersection, requiring coordination with Mendocino Transit Authority and potential relocation
▪ Numerous large, mature trees flank the legs of the intersection; avoiding new hardscape improvements within the drip line of the trees will help to protect the health of the trees ▪ Private improvements exist along back of walk on all legs of the intersection; to control costs and minimize project impacts outside of the public Right of Way, the project may need to incorporate strategic curb ramp type selection and placement, potentially including Case C curb ramps set back from the curb returns while also aiming to maintain the back of walk in-place
▪ A prolonged construction phase will have negative impacts on school and business-related traffic and pedestrian circulation; a simplified scope of improvements, including surface-mounted features and striping, will help to shorten the construction window and lessen construction-related traffic impacts We understand that a 2020 study titled Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas was prepared that identified a roundabout as the recommended intersection improvement. However, based on our knowledge of the area and preliminary layout work that we have completed, we also understand that a full single-lane roundabout is unlikely to fit within the exiting right of way, and will have significant impacts not only to exiting private improvements, but also to traffic during the lengthy construction phase. As an alternative to a conventional roundabout, we believe the City will reap many of the same benefits without the extensive scope of improvements by utilizing a creative and efficient mini roundabout, making use of the existing hardscape infrastructure to the extent possible.

Herein you will find that we have tailored our scope and approach to meet the budget that the City has available for the project. We understand that the City has limited funds for design and construction of the intersection improvements, but believe that our design approach can minimize both project costs as well as traffic impacts during construction.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 4

SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Project Management: BKF will provide general project management and consultant oversight services including defining and tracking tasks, status updates, general coordination, and preparation of a detailed schedule showing planned milestones and deliverables to be achieved for completion of the Project. BKF will also track the budget and issue monthly invoices.

Project Kick-Off Meeting: BKF will schedule regular progress meeting to discuss the status of the Project, upcoming efforts, issues, coordination items, and other relevant information. Agendas, action logs, updated project schedules, and meeting minutes will be prepared and distributed. We will also maintain frequent and timely communication with City staff throughout the duration of the Project.

Routine Status Update Meetings: BKF will schedule regular progress meetings to discuss the status of the Project, upcoming efforts, issues, coordination items, and other relevant information. At this time, we are assuming that monthly virtual meetings will be sufficient to keep the City informed of design progress.

Additionally, we will schedule in-person design review meetings to review milestone submittal materials with the City. Agendas, action logs, updated project schedules, and meeting minutes will be prepared and distributed. We will also maintain frequent and timely communication with City staff throughout the duration of the Project.

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC): BKF will perform quality control checks for each submittal in accordance with BKF’s Quality Manual prior to submitting to City. BKF’s Quality Control Manager will review both in-house and sub-consultant work at each phase of the Project to ensure quality and contract compliance. All plan review comments will be documented and formally responded to in the form of a comment response letter and/or comment response markups. A copy of BKF’s full Quality Manual can be provided upon request.

DELIVERABLES:
- Schedule Updates
- Invoices
- Progress Report
- Updated Action Log
- Meeting Agendas and Minutes
- Plan Review Response Documents
TASK 2: DATA COLLECTION
Record Data Collection: BKF will research and collect available records from the City, Mendocino County, and the public utilities to obtain property lines, utility data, and geotechnical and traffic information. BKF will take notes of any potential public/private conflicts within rights-of-way. While BKF understands it is the City’s intent to construct the Project within existing public rights-of-way, should a conflict occur, BKF will identify needed Right of Way or easements to facilitate the roundabout construction.

Public Utilities Coordination: Older streets often have shallow utilities which may conflict with full depth replacement paving or other designs implemented with this project. Additionally, in order to prolong the finished streets lifespan, it is important to coordinate any planned utility projects prior to final paving. BKF will communicate with Comcast, AT&T, and the City of Ukiah Public Works Utilities Division to understand the location of the existing and future utilities and to coordinate relocations and potential upgrades to their facilities, if needed. We will gather the available record drawings and/or block maps to depict the record location of the utilities superimposed onto the base map to be prepared as part of this agreement.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 5
Field Review: The consultant team, along with City staff, will visit the project area to review existing conditions, further identify constraints, and confirm project assumptions. During the course of the site walk, BKF will collect photos within the project limits.

Topographic Survey: In an effort to be efficient with our services and provide data only to the accuracy needed in specific locations, BKF will utilize multiple survey tools to survey the project corridor. BKF’s field crews will collect survey data with typical cross sections of the intersection at specific locations and higher density topographic spot data where bulb-outs or curb ramps are anticipated.

BKF will complete field surveys along the roadway, acquiring cross sections at 25 foot intervals. BKF will create base maps including topographic, utility, and boundary information that will be based on existing as-builts, right-of-way and easement maps as provided by the City. Base maps will include topographic features and fixed works such as grade breaks, drainage swales, striping, edge of pavements, concrete, trees 12-inches in diameter and larger, utility poles and other visible utility structures. Underground utilities will be shown based on observed surface information and as-built drawings provided by the City. “Dips” of gravity utility structures and subsurface exploration or detection of underground locating of utilities is not included in this scope of services, but can be provided as an additional service if requested.

Our understanding is that the City expects the project will be constructed within previously established and occupied roadway facilities, and that right-of-way property information is not critical. Therefor, in an effort to be efficient with our services and the City’s available fees, we are not proposing to survey or show property boundarys on the mapping. It does appear from the preliminary studies performed by other consultants for the City that there may be some confusion as to the location of the actual right of way. Therefore, if required, BKF can perform a right of way survey of the City owned property rights and adjoining private properties as an additional service. Please refer to optional services for right of way surveying services. Formal boundary determination and a record of survey are not included, but can be provided as an additional service.

Traffic Counts and Traffic Analysis: W-Trans will obtain intersection volumes during the school year including auto, pedestrian, and bicycle volumes during the weekday a.m., afternoon school pick-up, and p.m. peak hours. Existing traffic operation including level of service (LOS) and queuing will be summarized.

W-Trans will prepare a traffic analysis technical memorandum summarizing roundabout level of service (LOS) and queuing projections under the following scenarios:
▪ Existing school year volumes during the a.m. peak hour, afternoon school release peak hour, and p.m. peak hour
▪ Future volumes as developed from available sources or growth factors ▪ Existing and future volumes for a selected peak period that is heavily influenced by special event traffic such as a sports event at Ukiah High School
DELIVERABLES:
- Base Map including Topography and Utility Information - Tabulated Traffic Count Data
- Traffic Analysis Technical Memorandum

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 6
TASK 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
BKF will work closely with City staff to coordinate community outreach plan to inform the public of the forthcoming project. As the initial planning for the project has already been completed, and limited funding for the project will drive many of the available options, we believe that the public engagement activities for this project should be limited to informing and educating the public about the project, rather than hosting various events to develop wish-lists and project alternatives. To support the City’s outreach, BKF will be available to prepare presentation materials and graphics for either in-person or virtual meetings and outreach events. BKF will document the feedback received from the meeting attendees and project stakeholders in the form of meeting minutes and can be available to assist City staff with review and providing written responses to any formally received public comments. We have assumed that the project will require the following public outreach events; if additional public outreach is required for the project, we can provide a more robust community outreach plan in conjunction with our specialist subconsultant:
▪ One Workshop with City Staff, including the City Ad Hoc Committee ▪ One Project Presentation Event with the Public
▪ One City Council Presentation
Our community outreach plan includes engaging with both City and quasi-City staff members, as well as the general public. We anticipate meeting with the City’s Ad Hoc Committee and informal pedestrian and bicycle advisory group prior to commencing design. Following development of a conceptual design and acceptance of the design by City staff, BKF would provide content and graphics, including a project rendering, to City staff for inclusion on the City webpage and social media pages. We will then work with the City to host a public meeting to introduce the project and highlight its benefits to the community, as well as give the members of the public an opportunity to voice feedback and questions. Following the conclusion of the design phase, we can further support the City by participating in a City Council hearing to present the project for approval to bid and construct.

TASK 4: 30% DESIGN
The Design Team will collaborate with City staff to define the critical factors that could influence the roundabout layout and footprint, with a focus on identifying any existing physical elements (such as major utilities) to be avoided. Preferred design treatments to accommodate bicyclists such as wide peripheral pathways will also be identified with Staff, since such decisions may play a major role in the intersection's overall footprint and geometry. Movements that must accommodate large design vehicles will also be confirmed with the City. The potential to use modular components to construct a mini-roundabout will also be discussed with the City.

A roundabout design criteria technical memorandum will be prepared containing a summary of roundabout performance criteria as established in the Guide for Roundabouts, NCHRP Report 1043, 2023. The Design Team will also identify areas where there may be flexibility in design parameters in consideration of a mini-roundabout being selected for this location, and based on the site’s context including the surrounding street network and land uses. We will reference the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration MiniRoundabouts Technical Summary for supplemental design guidance.

Preliminary geometric alignment design concepts (10% design) for the single-lane roundabout will be prepared.

The design will be consistent with state-of-the-practice roundabout design methods and will include the locations of curbs (or modular components if used), striping, median and splitter islands, truck apron(s), the central island, pedestrian facilities, and bicycle facilities. The layouts will be carried through transitions to tie in points on the existing roadways.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 7
Following City feedback on the conceptual design, the Design Team will develop a 30% design package. We are familiar with the City of Ukiah’s Standard Plans and Notes and anticipate that these standards will be used as the basis for our design. The Design Team will coordinate with the City and verify that the proposed plan conforms to existing conditions, boundary, and site constraints. We will verify, based on the available record information, if there are any identifiable conflicts between proposed and existing improvements. At this stage, we will also assess the potential need to incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) features, based on the amount of new or replaced impervious surface. It is anticipated that the scope of new hardscape improvements will be limited, and that the project is unlikely to trigger the need to comply with local LID requirements. Initial layouts for the new or replaced pedestrian sidewalks and curb ramps will be provided.

Drawings: We will prepare the following drawings:
▪ Civil Cover Sheet
▪ Geometric Layout Plan
▪ Grading and Paving Plan
▪ Curb Ramp Layout Plan
▪ Striping Plan
Supporting Documents: We will prepare the following supporting documents:
▪ Preliminary LID sizing calculations
▪ Preliminary engineer’s estimate of probable construction costs ▪ Outline of technical specifications
DELIVERABLES:
- Conceptual (10%) Intersection Layout Exhibit
- Preliminary (30%) Design Drawings
- Preliminary (30%) Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs TASK 5: 60% DESIGN
Based on the comments received on the 30% design submittal, BKF will advance the design of the paving, hardscape, and striping improvements. During this task, we will layer in additional detail to the design and continue in-depth coordination with the City. Signing and striping plans will be prepared using CAMUTCD and Caltrans Standard Plans illustrating the signing, striping, and pavement markings at the roundabout. Curb ramps and other accessible pedestrian features will be designed in accordance with the Public Right-of-Way Accessibly Guidelines, and other hardscape and utility improvements in accordance with applicable City of Ukiah standards.

A photometric analysis will be conducted using Visual lighting software for the roundabouts and street lighting between the intersections based on ANSI/IES RP-8-22 guidelines. Photometric exhibits will be provided to the City for their review. Upon confirmation of the new lighting standard locations, the location of the service cabinet will be coordinated with PG&E to obtain a service point. Preparation of a request or application is assumed as part of the scope of work, but any fees owed to PG&E would be City responsibility.

Additionally, a roundabout performance technical memorandum will be prepared containing a summary of design vehicle maneuverability and fastest-path evaluations, including exhibits.

Drawings: We will prepare the following drawings:
▪ Civil Cover Sheet
▪ Notes & Legend
▪ Typical Roadway Sections
▪ Demolition and Erosion Control Plan
▪ Grading and Paving Plan

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 8
▪ Street Lighting Layout Plan
▪ Utility Plan
▪ Striping and Signage Plan
▪ Curb Ramp Layout and Grading Details
▪ Construction Details
Supporting Documents: We will prepare the following supporting documents:
▪ Engineer’s estimate of probable construction costs
▪ Technical specifications
▪ Roundabout Performance Technical Memorandum
▪ Photometric Analysis Exhibit
DELIVERABLES:
- Draft (60%) Design Drawings
- Draft (60%) Technical Specifications
- Draft (60%) Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs - Roundabout Performance Technical Memorandum
- Photometric Analysis Exhibit
TASK 6: FINAL PS&E
It is our understanding these documents will be used by the City to perform the bidding process, as such the documents will be detailed to the level required by the Contractor to bid and construct. The Design Team will finalize the plans, specifications, and engineer’s estimate of probable construction costs (collectively known as PS&E) based on final review comments from the City.

DELIVERABLES:
- Final Signed/Sealed Drawings for Construction
- Final Signed/Sealed Technical Specifications
- Final Signed/Sealed Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 9

OPTIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
We have developed our Scope of Services based on the level of effort and process that we believe the project will follow and have tailored our approach to be in-line with the City’s available funding for the project. However, as with any significant project there may be unforeseen challenges, late-breaking new opportunities, or changes in socio-political preferences that may require us to revisit our project scope and approach. Using our vast array of previous project experience, we have provided basic scope for a number of optional tasks that may be needed to support the projects, as well as identified some additional or specialty services that can be further defined and scoped, if and when the need arises.

OPTIONAL TASK 1: FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM BKF’s Grant Team will prepare a Technical Memorandum outlining the potential funding mechanisms and opportunities for project construction, including a review of potential grants, loans, collaborative partnerships, and mitigations funds. To support the development of the Memorandum, BKF would meet with the City to discuss funding preferences, review previous funding applications, and develop a game plan for target funding research. If needed, BKF can provide further grant application support to the City on an as-needed basis under an amendment to the project agreement.

OPTIONAL TASK 2: RIGHT OF WAY, BOUNDARY AND RECORD OF SURVEY If requested, BKF can provide boundary surveying to resolve right of way and easement locations based on title reports provided to BKF by the City. Should right of way or easement acquisitions be required, BKF will prepare legal descriptions and plat to accompany the offers made to private property owners. Upon completion of the boundary survey, BKF will file a Record of Survey with the Mendocino County Surveyor to fulfill our legal and professional obligations.

OPTIONAL TASK 3: UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES
If requested, BKF will provide underground utility detection services in the same area of the proposed topographic survey. BKF will perform utility investigation services using industry acceptable methods to determine the approximate horizontal position and count of existing utilities on the subject site (except irrigation, typically). BKF’s field crews will use a combination of water-based paint or marking chalk or pin flags (in the appropriate APWA color) to mark the results of our investigation on the ground surface. BKF will compare available utility record information (supplied by City) with the results of field investigation services to consolidate field evidence and record documentation. Utilities not identifiable by BKF’s field crews due to lack of utility record information or above ground appurtenances will be marked with pink paint on the ground surface and annotated as “Unknown” on the project deliverables. Once the utilities have been marked, BKF will survey the locations of the utilities and add them to the base drawing. BKF will utilize the project’s horizontal and vertical coordinate system so as to keep the utility data on the same coordinate system as the surveying files. BKF will make a reasonable effort to locate and map underground utilities, however, given the current technological limitations of the locating equipment, a guarantee as to all utilities cannot be made.

OPTIONAL TASK 4: BID AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE SUPPORT SERVICES BKF can provide bid and construction phase support services. Scope and fee can be provided upon request and would be executed as an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement.

Bid Support Services: BKF can assist the City during the construction bid solicitation process on an as-needed basis. Bid support services can include the following:
a. Responding to Requests for Information (RFIs) during the bid process b. Assisting the City with issuing bid addendum packages c. Summarizing and tabulating received bids

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 10
Construction Support Services: BKF can allocate time to support the Contractor and Design Team during the construction phase of the Project. Anticipated services include written responses to RFIs, review of submittals, and drawing revisions as needed. Preparation of record drawings based on the Contractor’s as-builts can also be provided as part of this service.

Construction Meetings: BKF can attend site meetings with the Contractor during the construction process.

Anticipated meetings include the following:
a. pre-construction meeting
b. three (3) interim site visits
c. final punch-list walk
d. additional meetings as determined necessary by the City ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL TASKS THAT CAN BE SCOPED AND PROVIDED UPON REQUEST:
▪ Environmental studies, entitlements, and permitting
▪ Caltrans LAPM and E-76 Compliance
▪ Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting
▪ Expanded Public Engagement
▪ Analysis and Design of a Conventional Roundabout
▪ Landscape Design and Public Art Improvements
▪ Grant Application Support
▪ Monument Preservation/Replacement
▪ Right of Way Acquisition

PROJECT TEAM
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 11

JASON KIRCHMANN, PE, PLS
Principal in Charge | BKF Engineers
EDUCATION: Civil Engineering, Surveying and
Technology Program, Santa Rosa Junior College
LICENSE: Licensed Civil Engineer, CA No. 78079,
Licensed Land Surveyor, CA No. 8806
- Gobbi Street Utility Replacement, Ukiah
- East Perkins Widening PS&E, Ukiah
- Paradise Drive Multi-Modal Improvements,
Corte Madera

BECKY DOWER, PE
Project Manager | BKF Engineers
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of
Nevada, Reno
LICENSE: Licensed Civil Engineer, CA No. 80868
- Gobbi Street Utility Replacement, Ukiah
- East Perkins Widening PS&E, Ukiah
- Electric Utility Field Operations Center, Ukiah
- Penngrove Intersection Improvements,
Sonoma County
- Paradise Drive Multi-Modal Improvements,
Corte Madera

JAGGI BHANDAL, PE, LEED AP
QA/QC Manager | BKF Engineers
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, UC Davis
LICENSE: Licensed Civil Engineer, CA No. 77430
- Clearlak Dam Road Roundabout, Clearlake
- Saratoga Village Turnaround, Saratoga
- MacArthur/Superior Roundabout, San Leandro
- The Homes at Deer Hill, Brown Avenue
Roundabout, Lafayette

IAN CARPENTER, PE, QSD/QSP
Project Engineer | BKF Engineers
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, California
Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
LICENSE: Licensed Civil Engineer, CA No. 93698
- Penngrove Intersection Improvements,
Sonoma County
- Coloma St. Safe Pathways to Schools, Sausalito
- Francisco Blvd. East Sidewalk Improvements,
San Rafael
- Third Street Rehabilitation Project San Rafael

RALPH THOMAS, PLS
Survey Manager | BKF Engineers
EDUCATION: B.S., Surveying, San Francisco
City College
LICENSE: Licensed Land Surveyor, CA No. 4760
- Cowell & Chiles Roundabout, Davis
- Dora Street Overlay: Construction Staking,
Ukiah
- Penngrove Intersection Improvements,
Sonoma County
- Francisco Blvd. East Sidewalk Improvements,
San Rafael

MARLEY MUELLER, JD
Funding Strategies Manager | BKF Engineers
EDUCATION: B.A., Rhetoric and Communications,
University of California, Davis.

J.D., University of West Los Angeles, School of Law
- Alameda de las Pulgas Corridor, Belmont
- Treat Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation, Concord
- L Street Bikeway and Streetscape Improvement
Project, Antioch
- Donald Gap Pedestrian Improvements,
Sonoma County

ATUL PATEL, PE, TE, PTOE
Traffic/Roundabout Consultant | W-Trans
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, UC Davis
LICENSE: Licensed Civil Engineer, CA No. 77430
- Alameda De Las Pulgas Corridor and Traffic
Signal Project, Belmont
- Creston Road Design Serivces, Paso Robles
- Creston Rd./ Rolling Hills Roundabout,
Paso Robles
- Murchison Drive/Trousdale Drive/Davis Drive
Bicycle Route, Burlingame

STAFF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

PROJECT TEAM
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 12
BKF has assigned professional engineers to specific roles based on the professionals’ expertise. We are organized for a quick response to address your needs and are able to meet tight schedules. If needed, BKF has the resources to provide additional experienced personnel, office support, and/or field staff. With a total staff of 500 employees, including 143 licensed civil engineers and 21 licensed land surveyors from which to draw resources, we are able to schedule multiple tasks simultaneously to respond to project needs quickly.

ORGANIZATION CHART
Jaggi Bhandal, PE
QA/QC Manager

BKF ENGINEERS
Ian Carpenter, PE, QSD/QSP
Project Engineer

BKF ENGINEERS
Ralph Thomas, PLS
Survey Manager

BKF ENGINEERS
Marley Mueller
Funding Strategies Manager

BKF ENGINEERS

BKF ENGINEERS TEAM

BKF ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS
500 SUPPORT STAFF
Geoff Riley
Environmental Services
WRA
Eric Chase
Geotechnical Engineering
RGH
Gladys Cornell
Public Outreach Consultant

AIM (DBE)

KEY SUBCONSULTANT
Jason Kirchmann, PE, PLS, QSD/QSP
Principal in Charge
Becky Dower, PE, QSD/QSP
Project Manager

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Atul Patel, PE, TE, PTOE
Traffic/Roundabout Consultant

W-TRANS (DBE)

OPTIONAL SERVICES SUBCONSULTANTS
Key Personnel
Michael Cook
Landscape Architecture
INTEGRA+
Rebekah Green
Right of Way Acquisition
BENDER ROSENTHAL, INC.

PROJECT TEAM
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 13

JASON KIRCHMANN, PE, PLS, QSD/QSP

PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Jason has a wide variety of experience in civil engineering design and land surveying for local municipalities and private sector clients. He has provided design support and project management on civic, healthcare, residential, education, parks, and commercial projects. He assists in converting clients’ ideas and desires into final construction documents. In a supervisory role, Jason has been responsible for all tasks related to the design and construction of transportation, residential, commercial and public works projects. He understands the importance of providing seamless coordination with clients, other professional consultants, and reviewing agencies. He brings a keen sense of urgency to projects, consistently demonstrating the ability to stay on schedule and within budget.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION
Santa Rosa Junior
College CEST Program

REGISTRATION
Professional Land
Surveyor, CA No. 8806
Professional Civil
Engineer, CA No. 78079
Qualified SWPPP
Developer and
Practitioner, No. 20085

AFFILIATIONS
Former Deputy County
Surveyor
(County of Marin)
Acting Town Surveyor
(Town of Corte Madera)
Acting Deputy City
Surveyor
(City of San Rafael)
California Land
Surveyors Association
(CLSA)
Member American
Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
AWARDS
North Bay Business
Journal’s 2018 “Forty
under 40” Award
Winner

TOTAL YEARS

EXPERIENCE
21 years
Gobbi Street Utility Replacement
Ukiah
East Perkins Widening PS&E
Ukiah
Electric Utility Field Operations Center
Ukiah
Dora Street Overlay:

Construction Staking
Ukiah
Petaluma Boulevard South
Road Diet
Petaluma
Petaluma Boulevard South Road Diet
(E Street to Crystal Lane)
Petaluma
Group 10 Pavement Rehabilitation -
Nave Drv & Bel Marin Keys Blvd.

Novato
Mill District Street Improvements
Healdsburg
St. Helena Grayson Avenue and South
Crane Avenue Rehabilitation R19-05
St. Helena
Cloverdale Vista Drive Slide Repair
Cloverdale
Francisco Boulevard East Sidewalk
Improvements
San Rafael
Wellington Avenue & Fallen Leaf
Street Rehabilitation
San Anselmo
City of Petaluma Intersection/ADA
Improvements
Petaluma
2nd & A Street Inverts
San Rafael
3rd Street - Lindaro Street Topo
San Rafael
Third Street at Hetherton Street
Improvement Project
San Rafael
Sausalito Southview Park
Improvement Project
Sausalito
Sonoma County Monument
Preservation-Barnett Valley Rd.

Santa Rosa
Sonoma County Monument
Preservation – Bohemian Hwy
Santa Rosa
Sonoma County Monument
Preservation – Porter Creek Rd.

Santa Rosa

PROJECT TEAM
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 14

BECKY DOWER, PE, QSD/QSP

PROJECT MANAGER
Becky has more than 15 years of experience in civil engineering design of public works improvements, including pavement rehabilitation, utility rehabilitation and replacement, streetscape and complete streets projects, and pedestrian facility upgrades for compliance with current ADA standards. Her responsibilities have included pavement alternatives review and pavement design, utility design, water system modeling, specifications for special conditions such as night work and sewer by-pass pumping, and cost estimating. In addition to design, Becky oversees internal budget, schedule, and staff resource management as well as external communications and client care. Becky enjoys collaborating with municipal clients and understands that successful public works projects need to be focused around an understanding of how the public uses the areas and perceives the value of the project at hand.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering,
University of Nevada,
Reno

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil
Engineer CA No. 80868
Qualified SWPPP
Developer and
Practitioner, No. 23934

TOTAL YEARS

EXPERIENCE
15 years
Gobbi Street Utility Replacement
Ukiah
East Perkins Widening PS&E
Ukiah
Courthouse-Design Build
Ukiah
Penngrove Intersection Improvements
Sonoma County
Sir Francis Drake Boulevard -
Construction Documents
San Rafael
Brannan-Lincoln Street Crosswalk
Improvements
Calistoga
Lake Street-Grant-Silverado Trail
Calistoga
Francisco Boulevard East Sidewalk
Improvements
San Rafael
St. Helena Grayson Ave and South
Crane Ave Rehabilitation R19-05
St. Helena
Ross Laurel Grove Safe Pathways to
School II
Ross
City of Petaluma- Intersection/ADA
Improvements
Petaluma
Paradise Drive Multi-Modal
Improvements
Corte Madera
SF Bay Trail - Lone Tree Point
Rodeo
City of Napa Pedestrian Bridge
Analysis
Napa
Petaluma North McDowell
Complete Streets
Petaluma
South Gate Residential Resurfacing
I&II
South Gate
Bridgeway Blvd Safety Improvements
Napa to Johnson
Sausalito
Maria Drive Roadway Rehabilitation
Petaluma

PROJECT TEAM
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 15

ATUL PATEL, PE, TE, PTOE
W-TRANS | PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Atul Patel is a Principal and oversees W-Trans’ design practice. He brings over 30 years of public and private sector traffic engineering design experience to our growing firm. He has designed numerous roadway lighting and signing and striping plans for roundabouts. He has designed traffic signal installations and modifications involving Caltrans and obtained encroachment permits for these clients. Some of his design projects have included flashing yellow arrow operation, signal hardware upgrades, ITS equipment, installation of traffic signal interconnect conduit and cable to the adjacent signals, installation of curb ramps that comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), video detection systems, video surveillance systems, emergency vehicle pre-emption, and fiber optic communication hubs. He has also completed railroad signal pre-emption, prepared signing and striping designs, and provided bid and construction assistance support services.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION
MBA, Technical
Management,
University of Phoenix
B.S., Civil Engineering,
Texas A&M University

REGISTRATION
Professional Traffic
Engineer, CA No. 2321
Professional Traffic
Operations Engineer,
No. 1640
Civil Engineer, TX No.
83987
Civil Engineer, FL No.
89838
Civil Engineer, HI No.
20897

TOTAL YEARS

EXPERIENCE
34 years
Alameda De Las Pulgas Corridor and Traffic Signal Project, Belmont, CA Deputy Project Manager responsible for PS&E. This study provided an evaluation of potential circulation improvements to Alameda de las Pulgas between Ralston Avenue and Club Drive-Dartmouth Avenue. W-Trans evaluated pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation issues along the corridor in the vicinity of Carlmont High School and Tierra Linda Middle School. The project included data collection, review and analysis, development of alternatives/options, and public outreach. Alternatives were developed that include options for traffic (bicycle and vehicular) circulation, pedestrian circulation, and parking within the public right-of-way and on both school campuses. Also considered were alternative school entrances/exits, traffic control measures for the corridor and side streets and alternatives for improving transit through the corridor. W-Trans is now preparing the detailed signing and striping design PS&E for the corridor and streetlighting plans for Alameda de las Pulgas and at the three roundabouts.

Creston Road Design Services Phase II, Paso Robles, CA
W-Trans led the preparation of the Creston Road Corridor Study for the City of Paso Robles in 2017 and is now assisting with the preparation of construction plans including a roundabout at the Golden Hills Road intersection. The corridor, including the roundabout, is being designed with a focus on Complete Street principles to more fully serve pedestrian and bicycle users and enhance multimodal safety for those accessing nearby schools.

Creston Road/Rolling Hills Roundabout, Paso Robles, CA
W-Trans completed a comprehensive study to determine future intersection improvements needed at this key intersection in the City of Paso Robles The intersection is located on an arterial serving several nearby schools and adjacent to a proposed high-density housing development. Study issues included pedestrian crossing safety, vehicular capacity, queuing and operational interaction with adjacent signalized intersections, access control, accommodation of bicyclists, and speed moderation. Installation of a modern roundabout was recommended, and the study includes a full conceptual roundabout design based on state-of-the-practice techniques used to balance safety, capacity, speed moderation, and accommodation of semi trucks and emergency vehicles.

CITY OF UKIAH
East Perkins Widening PS&E

CITY OF COTATI
Cotati Park and Ride*

CITY OF BELMONT
Alameda de las Pulgas Corridor*

SONOMA COUNTY
Penngrove Intersection Improvements*

CITY OF SANTA ROSA
Santa Rosa Corridor Improvements*

CITY OF SANTA ROSA
Santa Rosa Bicycle & Pedestrian Overcrossing*

SONOMA COUNTY
Forestville Pedestrian Improvements*

TOWN OF WINDSOR
Old Redwood Hwy/Shiloh Rd. Intersection
* Current Project

PROJECT TEAM
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 16
BKF Engineers has served the City of Ukiah for the past four (4) years, and will continue to serve the City to the best of our abilities when given the opportunity. We have purposefully selected and invited our longstanding subconsultant, W-Trans, that we have partnered with for nearly ten (10) years. The BKF Team has decades of industry experience with cities and agencies, similar to the City of Ukiah, and we are eager to bring forth the expertise and capabilities our team offers to you.

WORKING HISTORY WITH SUBCONSULTANT TEAM

CURRENT AND PREVIOUS WORK ASSIGNMENTS WITH W-TRANS

EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 17
160
Professional
Engineers &
Surveyors
Founded in
1915
500
Employees
16 West Coast
Offices
▪ Civil Engineering
▪ Surveying
▪ Planning
▪ Transportation
▪ Water Resources
▪ Construction
Management
▪ Utility Locating
▪ Grants Funding

SERVICES
▪ Santa Rosa
▪ Modesto
▪ Newport Beach
▪ Oakland
▪ Pleasanton
▪ Portland
▪ Redwood City
▪ Roseville
▪ Sacramento
▪ San Francisco
▪ Salinas
▪ San Diego
▪ San Jose
▪ San Luis Obispo
▪ San Rafael
▪ Walnut Creek

OFFICE LOCATIONS
Delivering Inspired Infrastructure for
over 109 years
BKF Engineers
Since 1915, BKF Engineers has earned a reputation for its ability to successfully plan, design, survey, and implement complex projects. We are an engineering and land surveying firm that has dedicated its talents, time, and resources to supporting the needs and vision of communities in the
western United States. Our clients continue to call upon us to partner with them to design and build the most
challenging projects the West Coast has seen in the last hundred years. With complete services from funding
strategies to design-build, we are equipped with over 500 team members from the network of our 16 offices to make our clients’ projects happen. Our portfolio includes projects in transportation, water, land surveying, retail, commercial, government, civic, and federal projects. We’re driven by our passion for our neighbors and being a part of something greater, which is our communities.

We follow a project from inception to completion by helping our clients acquire adequate funding to achieve their project goals successfully. Our proven approach recognizes that developing dynamic projects is informed by focused team collaboration, mitigating physical constraints and potential risks, and balancing design goals with value engineering solutions. Facilitating the unique permitting and expertise requirements of projects, we provide a number of specialty services, including agency permit expediting, grant/funding strategies, sustainable infrastructure, site accessibility consulting, hydrology/hydraulics, traffic signal and traffic handling designs, utility locating services, automated
construction surveying monitoring, and 3D laser scanning.

BKF’s 109+ years of engineering, surveying, and planning experience is evident in our legacy projects throughout the west coast. With our comprehensive suite of services, we cater to our clients by offering tailored solutions. Notable projects include Clearlake Dam Road Roundabout, Cowell
& Chiles Roundabout, Sakurai Street Roundabout, Saratoga Village Turnaround, Stanford Bowdoin Roundabout, Old
Redwood Highway at Shiloh, Old Redwood Highway at
Ely, Old Redwood Highway at Railroad, and Southwest
Boulevard at Adrian.

EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 18

MINI-ROUNDABOUT, LIGHTING AND

TRAFFIC CONTROL DESIGN

HEALDSBURG, CA

REFERENCE
City of Healdsburg
Curt Bates
Project Manager
Ph. (707) 431-3335
[email protected]
To support construction of an approved new residential development in Healdsburg, W-Trans prepared plans for the traffic aspects of the project, including design of a mini-roundabout, street lighting and traffic control.

The project is located on Grove Street, a two-lane two-way street that is parallel to US 101, carries a moderate volume, and provides access to single family residences and commercial properties at each end of the block.

The traffic control plans were challenging because of the narrow width of the road and the need to maintain access to the private properties.

WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANSPORTATION, INC. (DBA W-TRANS) Address: 490 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 201, Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Key Personnel Contact: Atul Patel, PE, PTOE
Ph. (707) 284-7736 Email. [email protected]
W-Trans has established and maintained a strong design practice since the founding of the company in 1995.

While the early years focused primarily on vehicle-oriented design services such as traffic signal and signing and striping plans, our design services have evolved with the transportation engineering industry and W-Trans has played a crucial role in advocating for, and designing, new state-of-the practice facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists such as enhanced pedestrian crossings and protected and buffered bike lanes. W-Trans is proud to have designed the first High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk (HAWK) Beacon in Sonoma County on Montgomery Drive adjacent to the Spring Lake Village senior living community in the City of Santa Rosa.

Our design projects range from traffic control improvements at intersections to mid-block crossing enhancements to Complete Streets corridor-level improvement projects. Our design and Complete Streets practices often work hand-in-hand and allow W-Trans the unique ability to work on all transportation-related aspects of a design project in-house from concept design to final design all the way through construction support. Many of our construction design projects are a result of an improvement identified through one of our corridor studies or are based on concept design plans prepared by our Complete Streets practice. This capability allows critical design knowledge to be passed along seamlessly from an operational analysis or concept plan to a final design plan with the benefit being a cohesive, well-thought-out construction drawing.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
▪ Healdsburg Mini-Roundabout, Lighting, and Traffic Control Design (City of Healdsburg) ▪ Five Corners Mini-Roundabout Design (City of Avalon)
▪ Creston Road/Golden Hills Road Roundabout Design (City of Paso Robles) ▪ Alameda De Las Pulgas/San Carlos Avenue Corridor (Cities of San Carlos and Belmont) ▪ Old Redwood Highway Complete Street Improvements (Town of Windsor)

SUBCONSULTANT INFORMATION

EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 19

REFERENCE
City of Ukiah
Andrew Stricklin
Senior Engineer
Ph. (707) 436-6297
[email protected]

PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
» New ADA-compliance
curb ramps
» Limited public Right of
Way, requiring unique
curb ramp and driveway
apron replacements
» Utility main and service
replacements
» Storm drain extension
» Sidewalk replacement
» Intersection
improvements
» Pavement rehabilitation
» Striping and signage
improvements

EAST PERKINS WIDENING PROJECT
City of Ukiah, using Measure Y funds, intends for the East Perkins Widening Project to be a revitalization of Perkins Street from Main Street to Pomeroy Avenue with improvements intended to restart the pavement design life and polish off the corridor following the recent completion of the overhead undergrounding project. While the entire project corridor spans approximately 2,470 linear feet in length, most of the desired improvements are centered around the East Perkins Street and South Orchard Avenue intersection, adjacent to the 101 interchange. The improvements at this location are to support a new vehicle lane through the intersection; including widening on the north side and south side of East Perkins Street, along with the associated hardscape (new 5-foot sidewalk) and utility improvements (including new storm drain, street light relocation, and traffic signal relocation).

GOBBI STREET UTILITY REPLACEMENT
The City of Ukiah, using Measure Y funds, intends for the project to be a revitalization of Gobbi Street to modernize the utility system and restart the pavement design life for the section between South Dora Street and the western limits of the US Highway 101 interchange. The project will include the replacement of the aging utility infrastructure along the Gobbi Street corridor following the planned undergrounding of the existing overhead lines and the upcoming installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Gobbi Street and Waugh Lane (to be completed as separate projects).

BKF will provide the City with recommendations and design options for pavement rehabilitation, utility replacement design, new curb ramps at select locations, and restriping of the roadway. While many of the Gobbi Street Utility Replacement components may seem fairly standard for a typical utility replacement and paving improvement project, during our visit of the site and review of publicly available documentation, we have observed unique challenges that will accompany the design and construction of the project.

CITY OF UKIAH PROJECTS

UKIAH, CA

GOBBI STREET UTILITY REPLACEMENT EAST PERKINS WIDENING PROJECT

EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 20

REFERENCE
Sonoma County
Carmen Rodriguez
Project Manager
Ph. (707) 565-2440
Carmen.Rodriguez1@
sonoma-county.org

PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
» Roundabout layout
alternatives
» Roundabout “Design
Checks”
» Coordination with local
transit authority
» Storm drain re-routing
and extension
» Environmental review
and permitting
» Right of Way
Acquisition
» Pavement rehabilitation
» Striping and signage
improvements
» LIghting improvements

NEW ROUNDABOUTS AT ELY ROAD AND RAILROAD AVENUE
A significant number of vehicles use Petaluma Hill Road and Old Redwood Highway as an alternate north-south route. As a result, intersections around Penngrove face significant congestion during peak hours. Sonoma County is currently working on a project to improve safety and efficiency at the intersection of Adobe Road and Main Street/Petaluma Hill Road. The County now seeks to improve Old Redwood Highway at the Ely Road and Railroad Avenue intersections. Together, the improvements at these three intersections will improve the flow of traffic for the Penngrove community and along the Old Redwood Highway and Petaluma Hill Road corridors.

This project will involve two phases of work. Phase 1 will construct improvements at the intersection of Old Redwood Highway North and Ely Road. Phase 2 will construct improvements at the intersection of Old Redwood Highway North and East/West Railroad Avenue. The intersection improvements will maintain Old Redwood Highway North as a truck route and install new ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalks, and signage.

BKF scope includes Roadway engineering, including ADA Compliance, Quantity calculations, Preliminary right-of-way engineering, and acquisition support, Utility research and coordination, including relocation, Drainage design and stormwater treatment, Traffic control, Pavement delineation, Hydraulic analysis, Topographic and boundary surveying, Preparation of bid-ready Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), and Assistance with environmental permits.

PENNGROVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

SONOMA, CA

EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 21

REFERENCE
City of Vacaville
Shaen Graf, PE, LSIT
Associate Civil Engineer
Ph. (707) 449-5396
shawn.graf@cityofvacaville.
com

PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
» Three specialized
roundabout designs
» Preparation of PID, PA/
ED Documents
» NEPA/CEQA
Environmental
Clearance
» Class I Bicycle/
Pedestrian Facility
» Intersection Control
Evaluation Analysis
» Caltrans Cooperative
Agreement
» E-76 Authorization
» Cost Estimates
» Community, Private
Stakeholder, and MultiJurisdictional Agency
Consensus
» Utility and R/W Impacts
Vaca Valley Parkway is a multi-lane, high-speed roadway with very large vehicles traversing the corridor and subject intersections, so the incorporation of roundabouts followed a rigorous design development and approval process with the City, Caltrans, and local stakeholders. BKF developed a Roundabout Validation Report consistent with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) and Caltrans Highway Design Manual design recommendations for roundabouts. BKF was retained by the City of Vacaville to prepare a PID, PA&ED, and PS&E documents to achieve the project approval of I-505/Vaca Valley Parkway Corridor Multimodal Improvements project in the City of Vacaville. Given 3 consecutive roundabouts are proposed, BKF supported the City with Community and Stakeholder outreach efforts. These efforts included engagement and education on how large trucks can navigate the consecutive roundabouts given the corridor is highly frequented by large trucks accessing the nearby Vaca Valley Truck Center.

I-505/VACA VALLEY PARKWAY MULTI-MODAL

CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS

VACAVILLE, CA

EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 22

REFERENCE
City of Menlo Park
Michael Fu
Associate Civl Engineer
Ph. (650) 330-6706
[email protected]

PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
» Development of
design alternatives
resulting in operational
improvements and cost
savings
» Traffic operation
improvements
» Facilitate negotiations
with adjacent property
owners to minimize
right of way impacts
» Coordination with
multiple agencies and
utility owners
» Stormwater treatment
BKF was retained by Signature Development Group and the City of Menlo Park to prepare PS&E documents for the O’Brien Drive Intersection Roundabout project in the City of Menlo Park. The objective of the project is to connect communities established as part of Meta’s Willow Village campus expansion project and to accommodate future vehicular capacity requirements while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

As part of the Willow Village Project, BKF led the evaluation and design of a specialized roundabout at the O’Brien Drive, Main Street, and East Loop Road intersection. At the site of the Old Prologis Campus, which is currently occupied by Meta, the project involves widening O’Brien Drive by approximately 18 feet and modifying its horizontal geometry to accommodate a roundabout. To ensure a smooth flow of traffic and enhance safety, the proposed roundabout design features 12-foot minimum travel lanes, 2-foot minimum inside shoulders, 5-foot landscaped areas, and 10-foot sidewalks in each direction. Working with the City and Signature Development Group, BKF developed design elements to provide adequate space for vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists, creating a well-integrated transportation network.

Since the roundabout traverses a sensitive SFPUC Hetchey water system and numerous business properties, BKF prepared 6 different design concepts in coordination with stakeholders and SFPUC to reach a desired design. Due to the project’s footprint and location within surrounding properties, BKF has been working with impacted property owners to develop parking lot reconfigurations to minimize business operation disruptions and mitigate any negative effects on property owners and other critical stakeholders.

BKF will prepare necessary right-of-way dedications to the City involving portions along O’Brien Drive which will be essential to implementing the proposed design effectively.

WILLOW VILLAGE O’BRIEN DRIVE ROUNDABOUT

MENLO PARK, CA

City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 23

PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Project Management 150 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 2/7/25
2 Project Management and Routine Project Meetings 150 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 2/7/25 3 Project Kick‐Off Meeting with City 0 days Mon 7/15/24 Mon 7/15/24 4 Data Collection 30 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 8/23/24
5 Record Data Collection and Field Review 3 wks Mon 7/15/24 Fri 8/2/24 6 Public Utilities Coordination 6 wks Mon 7/15/24 Fri 8/23/24 7 Field Review 1 wk Mon 7/22/24 Fri 7/26/24
8 Topographic Survey 2 wks Mon 7/22/24 Fri 8/2/24
9 Traffic Counts and Traffic Analysis 3 wks Mon 7/22/24 Fri 8/9/24 10 Public Engagement 135 days Mon 8/5/24 Mon 2/10/25
11 Workhop with City Staff 0 days Mon 8/5/24 Mon 8/5/24 12 Project Presentation to Public 0 days Mon 10/21/24 Mon 10/21/24 13 Project Presentation to City Council 0 days Mon 2/10/25 Mon 2/10/25 14 30% Design 45 days Mon 8/12/24 Fri 10/11/24
15 Design Drawings/Coordination 4 wks Mon 8/12/24 Fri 9/6/24 16 Calculations and Analysis 4 wks Mon 8/12/24 Fri 9/6/24 17 30% QA/QC Review 2 wks Mon 9/9/24 Fri 9/20/24
18 30% Design Package to City 0 days Fri 9/20/24 Fri 9/20/24 19 City Review of 30% Design Package 3 wks Mon 9/23/24 Fri 10/11/24 20 Progress Review Meeting 0 days Fri 10/11/24 Fri 10/11/24 21 60% Design 60 days Mon 10/14/24 Fri 1/3/25
22 Design Drawings/Coordination 6 wks Mon 10/14/24 Fri 11/22/24 23 Calculations and Analysis 6 wks Mon 10/14/24 Fri 11/22/24 24 Specifications and Estimate 4 wks Mon 10/28/24 Fri 11/22/24 25 60% QA/QC Review 2 wks Mon 11/25/24 Fri 12/6/24
26 60% Design Package to City 0 days Fri 12/6/24 Fri 12/6/24 27 City Review of 60% Design Package 4 wks Mon 12/9/24 Fri 1/3/25 28 Progress Review Meeting 0 days Fri 1/3/25 Fri 1/3/25 29 Final PS&E 25 days Mon 1/6/25 Fri 2/7/25
30 Final PS&E Updates 3 wks Mon 1/6/25 Fri 1/24/25
31 Final QA/QC Review 2 wks Mon 1/27/25 Fri 2/7/25
32 Final Design Package to City 0 days Fri 2/7/25 Fri 2/7/25 Project Management
Project Management and Routine Project Meetings
7/15
Project Kick-Off Meeting with City
Data Collection
Record Data Collection and Field Review
Public Utilities Coordination
Field Review
Topographic Survey
Traffic Counts and Traffic Analysis
Public Engagement
8/5
Workhop with City Staff
10/21
Project Presentation to Public
2/10
Project Presentation to City Council
30% Design
Design Drawings/Coordination
Calculations and Analysis
30% QA/QC Review
9/20
30% Design Package to City
City Review of 30% Design Package
10/11
Progress Review Meeting
60% Design
Design Drawings/Coordination
Calculations and Analysis
Specifications and Estimate
60% QA/QC Review
12/6
60% Design Package to City
City Review of 60% Design Package
1/3
Progress Review Meeting
Final PS&E
Final PS&E Updates
Final QA/QC Review
2/7
Final Design Package to City
Jun '24 Jul '24 Aug '24 Sep '24 Oct '24 Nov '24 Dec '24 Jan '25 Feb '25 Mar '25 City of Ukiah Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road Page 1

EXCEPTIONS
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street 24
Our Team has reviewed the City’s Agreement provided in the RFP. While we can accept the Agreement, we would like to present the following edits for your consideration. These suggestions are provided as the basis of negotiation and we would welcome the opportunity to discuss any items listed herein that may not be agreeable to the City:

REMOVE TEXT IN RED: C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

REMOVE TEXT IN RED & ADD TEXT IN PURPLE:: 6.2 Indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing insurance requirements, and in addition thereto, Consultant agrees, for the full period of time allowed ..TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED..by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement, to indemnify the City for any claim, cost or liability that arises out of, or pertains to, or relates to any negligent act or omission or the willful misconduct of Consultant and its agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design by the City, or arising from the active negligence of the City.

BKF Engineers
200 4th Street, Suite 300
Santa Rosa, CA 95401
www.bkf.com

CONTACT
Jason Kirchmann, PE, PLS, QSD/QSP
(707) 583-8515
[email protected]

City of Ukiah

PROPOSAL FOR

DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

ROUNDABOUT DESIGN AT LOW GAP ROAD AND NORTH BUSH STREET

FEE PROPOSAL
JUNE 12, 2024
ATTACHMENT 4

June 12, 2024
Mary Horger
Financial Services Manager
City of Ukiah
[email protected]
Submitted via email
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS -

ROUNDABOUT DESIGN AT LOW GAP ROAD AND NORTH BUSH STREET Dear Ms. Horger and the Selection Committee:

Thank you for the opportunity to submit our fee proposal for your consideration. We look forward to discussing more with the City during negotiations.

Sincerely,

BKF ENGINEERS
Jason Kirchmann, PE, PLS
Principal/Executive in Charge

COVER LETTER
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street

FEE PROPOSAL
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street
W-Trans

VP AP PM SPE PE DE FC FC
$302 $273 $260 $222 $195 $170 $222 $143
1 Project Management
1 Project Management 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 $10,920 $0 $0 $10,920 2 Project Kick-Off Meeting 4404 4 4 0 0 20 $4,648 $0 $0 $4,648 3 Routine Status Update Meetings 16 40 0 0 24 0 0 0 80 $20,432 $17,500 $19,250 $39,682 4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) 4 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 28 $7,448 $0 $0 $7,448 24 84 24 4 28 4 0 0 168 $43,448 $17,500 $19,250 $62,698 2 Data Collection
1 Record Data Collection 0100 4 8 0 0 13 $2,413 $0 $4,100 $6,513 2 Public Utilities Coordination 0100 2 4 0 0 7 $1,343 $0 $0 $1,343 3 Field Review 0400 4 4 0 0 12 $2,552 $0 $4,127 $6,679
4 Topographic Survey 2 2 1 0 0 16 10 10 41 $7,780 $0 $0 $7,780 5 Traffic Counts and Traffic Analysis 0202 0000 4 $990 $6,000 $6,600 $7,590 2 10 1 2 10 32 10 10 77 $15,078 $6,000 $14,827 $29,905
3 Public Engagement
1 Workshop with City Staff and Committees 0600 0 0 0 0 6 $1,638 $0 $0 $1,638 2 Public Project Presentation 0800 0 0 0 0 8 $2,184 $0 $0 $2,184 3 City Council Presentation 0400 0 0 0 0 4 $1,092 $0 $0 $1,092 4 Public Engagement Graphics and Materials 0 8 0 0 0 16 0 0 24 $4,904 $0 $0 $4,904 0 26 0 0 0 16 0 0 42 $9,818 $0 $0 $9,818
4 30% Design
1 Conceptual Design 2200 4 0 0 0 8 $1,930 $15,500 $17,050 $18,980 2 Drawings 4 16 8 0 20 40 0 0 88 $18,356 $17,000 $18,700 $37,056 3 Supporting Documents 0008 0 2 0 0 10 $2,116 $5,500 $6,050 $8,166 6 18 8 8 24 42 0 0 106 $22,402 $38,000 $41,800 $64,202
5 60% Design
1 Drawings 4 12 4 0 16 32 0 0 68 $14,084 $24,500 $26,950 $41,034 2 Specifications 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 14 $3,210 $2,500 $2,750 $5,960 3 Cost Opinion 0100 4 4 0 0 9 $1,733 $1,000 $1,100 $2,833 4 Supporting Documents 0008 0 2 0 0 10 $2,116 $2,800 $3,080 $5,196 4 15 4 20 20 38 0 0 101 $21,143 $30,800 $33,880 $55,023 6 Final PS&E
1 Drawings 4 8 2 0 12 20 0 0 46 $9,652 $9,500 $10,450 $20,102 2 Specifications 0108 0 0 0 0 9 $2,049 $1,500 $1,650 $3,699 3 Cost Opinion 0100 2 2 0 0 5 $1,003 $1,000 $1,100 $2,103 4 10 2 8 14 22 0 0 60 $12,704 $12,000 $13,200 $25,904
General BKF Printing, Plotting, and Travel (1% of Total) Consultant Labor Totals 40 163 39 42 96 154 10 10 554 $124,593 $104,300 $122,957 $247,550 Total Fees* (Total fees include consultant and reimbursable markups pursuant to rate sheets) $250,030 Sub-Consultant
Task Description Full Rate
1 Project Management Subtotal:

PrincipalProject ManagerDesign Engineer Field Crew Party Chief $2,480
Sr Project EngineerField Crew Chainperson
Total BKF Fee
Total Subconsultant Fee*
*Includes 10% Markup
Transportation
Total BKF Hours
Reimbursable and Consultant Expenses
Low Gap Road and North Bush Street Roundabout
Project Engineer
4 30% Design Subtotal:
3 Public Engagement Subtotal:
5 60% Design Subtotal:

Total Fee
6 Final PS&E Subtotal:
2 Data Collection Subtotal:

CONSULTING SERVICES
QA/QC Manager

HOURLY RATE FEE SCHEDULE
City of Ukiah | Design and Engineering Services Roundabout Design at Low Gap Road and North Bush Street

BKF ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RATE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2024

CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Principal $302.00
Senior Associate Principal $280.00
Associate Principal $273.00
Senior Project Manager | Senior Technical Manager $265.00 Project Manager | Technical Manager $260.00
Engineering Manager | Surveying Manager | Planning Manager $239.00

TECHNICAL STAFF
Senior Project Engineer | Senior Project Surveyor | Senior Project Planner $222.00 Project Engineer | Project Surveyor | Project Planner $195.00 Design Engineer | Staff Surveyor | Staff Planner $170.00 BIM Specialist I, II, III $170.00 - $195.00 - $222.00
Technician I, II, III, IV $162.00 - $172.00 - $189.00 - $203.00 Drafter I, II, III, IV $127.00 - $139.00 - $150.00 - $167.00 Engineering Assistant | Surveying Assistant | Planning Assistant $106.00

FIELD SURVEYING
Survey Party Chief $222.00
Instrument Person $190.00
Survey Chainperson $143.00
Utility Locator I, II, III, IV $116.00 - $164.00 - $197.00 - $224.00 Apprentice I, II, III, IV $88.00 - $118.00 - $130.00 - $138.00

CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
Senior Consultant $290.00
Senior Construction Administrator $253.00
Resident Engineer $188.00
Field Engineer I, II, III $170.00 - $195.00 - $222.00

FUNDING & GRANT MANAGEMENT
Director of Funding Strategies $208.00
Funding Strategies Manager $190.00
Funding/Research Analyst I, II, III, IV $130.00 - $150.00 - $160.00 - $176.00

PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Project Coordinator $142.00
Senior Project Assistant $122.00
Project Assistant $108.00
Clerical | Administrative Assistant $90.00
Expert witness rates are available upon request.

Subject to the terms of a services agreement:
• Charges for outside services, equipment, materials, and facilities not furnished directly by BKF Engineers will be billed as reimbursable expenses at cost plus 10%. Such charges may include, but shall not be limited to: printing and reproduction services; shipping, delivery, and courier charges; subconsultant fees and expenses; agency fees; insurance; transportation on public carriers; meals and lodging; and consumable materials. • Allowable mileage will be charged at the prevailing IRS rate per mile. • Monthly invoices are due within 30 days from invoice date. Interest will be charged at 1.5% per month on past due accounts.
• The rates shown are subject to periodic increases, including January 1st of each year.

BKF Engineers
200 4th Street, Suite 300
Santa Rosa, CA 95401
www.bkf.com

CONTACT
Jason Kirchmann, PE, PLS, QSD/QSP
(707) 583-8515
[email protected]

Agenda Item No: 14.d.

MEETING DATE/TIME: 9/4/2024

ITEM NO: 2024-523

AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Receive Updates on City Council Committee and Ad Hoc Assignments, and, if Necessary, Consider Modifications to Assignments and/or the Creation/Elimination of Ad Hoc(s).

DEPARTMENT: City Clerk PREPARED BY: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk PRESENTER: Mayor Dueñas and Various Councilmembers
ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2024 City Council Special Assignments and Ad Hocs
Summary: City Council members will provide reports and updates on their committee and ad hoc assignments. If necessary, the Council may consider modifications.

Background: City Council members are assigned to a number of committees and ad hoc activities. These assignments are included as Attachment 1.

Discussion: Previously, the City Council discussed having more time allocated to reporting on committee and ad hoc activities. Often, the Council Reports section of the regular agenda is rushed due to impending business (i.e., public hearings), and not enough time is afforded for reports beyond community activities.

In an effort to foster regular updates on committee and ad hoc assignments, this item is being placed on the agenda to provide the City Council members an expanded opportunity to report on assignments and modify assignments as necessary.

Recommended Action: Receive report(s). The Council will consider modifications to committee and ad hoc assignments along with the creation/elimination ad hoc(s).

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: No
CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A
PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A
FINANCING SOURCE: N/A
PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A
COORDINATED WITH: N/A
DIVERSITY-EQUITY INITIATIVES (DEI): N/A
CLIMATE INITIATIVES (CI): N/A
GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS (GP): N/A

2024 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT LIST

LOCAL / UKIAH VALLEY MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT City Broadband Project TBD TBD
Civic Center
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
to evaluate the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Internet Service Provider (ISP) for the California's Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Last Mile Broadband
Orozco
Jim Robbins, Grants Manager, 463-6708;
[email protected]
Investment Oversight Committee Varies
Civic Center
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
Civic Center
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
Reviews City investments, policies, and strategies
Crane
Orozco - Alternate
Alan Carter, Treasurer
Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance; 463-6220
[email protected]
Disaster Council
Shall meet a minimum of
once a year at a time and
place designated upon
call of the chair
Place designated upon call of the chair or, if
she/he is unavailable or unable to call such
meeting, the first vice chair and then the City
Manager or her/his designee.

Office of Emergency Management
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
467-5720 - Traci Boyl
Develop any necessary emergency and mutual aid plans, agreements, ordinances, resolutions, rules, and regulations.

Orozco
Duenas- Alternate
Traci Boyl, City Manager's Office Management
Analyst; 467-5720; [email protected]
Greater Ukiah Business & Tourism
Alliance (GUPTA)
4th Monday of month,
10 a.m.
200 S School St.

Ukiah, CA 95482
200 S School St.

Ukiah, CA 95482
Promotes tourism and works to strengthen and promote the historic downtown and businesses within the greater Ukiah area
Marianne Davison - Community
Services Department Staff
Duenas - Alternate
Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager;
467-5793 [email protected]
Mendocino County Inland Water and
Power Commission (IWPC)
2nd Thursday of month,
6:00 p.m.

Civic Center
300 Seminary Avenue
conference room 5
IWPC Staff
P.O. Box 1247
Ukiah, CA 95482
391-7574 - Candace Horsley
Develops coordination for water resources and current water rights: Potter Valley project - Eel River Diversion
Rodin
Orozco - Alternate
Sean White, Director of Water Resources;
463-5712 [email protected]
North Coast Opportunities (NCO) 4th Wednesday of
month, 2 p.m. Alternating locations - Ukiah and Lakeport Governing Board Chair
North Coast Opportunities
413 North State Street
Ukiah, CA 95482
Assist low income and disadvantaged people to become self reliant Burgess Jake Burgess, Community Services Supervisor;
463-6201
[email protected]
Sun House Guild ex officio 2nd Tuesday of month,
4:30 p.m.

Sun House
431 S. Main St.

Ukiah, CA
431 S. Main Street
Ukiah, CA 95482
467-2836
Support and expand Grace Hudson Museum Duenas
Neil Davis - Alternate
David Burton, Museum Director; 467-2836
[email protected]
Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater
Sustainability Agency (GSA)
2nd Thursday of month,
1:30 p.m.

Board of Supervisors Chambers; 501 Low
Gap Road
Ukiah, CA
County Executive Office
501 Low Gap Rd., Rm. 1010
Ukiah, CA 95482
463-4441
GSA serves as the Groundwater Sustainability Agency in the Ukiah Valley basin
Crane
Duenas- Alternate
Sean White, Director of Water Resources;
463-5712 [email protected]

MENDOCINO COUNTY MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT City Selection Committee Called as required by the
Clerk of the Board
BOS Conference Room
501 Low Gap Rd. Rm. 1090
Ukiah, CA
C/O: BOS
501 Low Gap Rd., Rm 1090
Ukiah, CA 95482
463-4441
Makes appointments to LAFCO and Airport Land Use Commission (Mayor - Primary; Vice Mayor - Alternate)
Mayor Duenas
Vice Mayor Crane - Alternate
Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217
[email protected]
Economic Development & Financing
Corporation (EDFC)
2nd Thursday of month,
2:00 p.m.

Primarily 631 S. Orchard Street
(location varies)
Executive Director
631 South Orchard Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
467-5953
Multi-agency co-op for economic development and business loan program Riley (appointed 12/19/18)
Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager;
467-5793 [email protected]
Library Advisory Board
3rd Wednesdays of
alternate months; 1:00
p.m.

Various Mendocino County Libraries Ukiah County Library 463-4491 Review library policy and activities Sher
Rodin - Alternate
Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217;
[email protected]
Mendocino County 1st District Liaison Monthly; TBD
Civic Center Annex
conference room #5
411 West Clay St.

Ukiah, CA 95482
Civic Center
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
To coordinate activities and policy development with the City's 1st District Supervisor
Rodin
Crane- Alternate
Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager;
463-6221; [email protected]
Mendocino County 2nd District Liaison 1st Wednesdays of month, 8:00 a.m.

Civic Center Annex
conference room #5
411 West Clay St.

Ukiah, CA 95482
Civic Center
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
To coordinate activities and policy development with the County's 2nd District Supervisor
Rodin
Duenas - Alternate
Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager;
467-5793 [email protected]
Mendocino Council of Governments
(MCOG)
1st Monday of month,
1:30 p.m.

Board of Supervisors Chambers
501 Low Gap Road
Ukiah, CA
Executive Director
367 N. State Street, Ste. 206
Ukiah, CA 95482
463-1859
Plan and allocate State funding, transportation, infrastructure and project County wide
Duenas
Sher - Alternate
Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer;
463-6280 [email protected]
Mendocino County Airport Land Use
Commission As needed
BOS Conference Room
501 Low Gap Rd., Rm. 1090,
Ukiah, CA
Mendocino County Executive Office
501 Low Gap Rd. Rm. 1010
Ukiah, CA 95482
To formulate a land use compatibility plan, provide for the orderly growth of the airport and the surrounding area, and safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity
Liaisons: Owen/Schlatter
Greg Owen, Airport Manager; 467-2855;
[email protected]
Craig Schlatter, Director of Community
Development; 463-6219;
[email protected]
Mendocino County Local Area
Formation Commission (LAFCO)
1st Monday of month,
9:00 a.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers
Executive Director
200 S. School Street, Ste. 2
Ukiah, CA 95482
463-4470
Required by legislation - planning spheres of influence, annexation, service areas, and special districts
Rodin
Crane - Alternate for both city seat
members on Commission
Craig Schlatter, Director of Community
Development; 463-6219;
[email protected]
Updated: 6/6/2024
ATTACHMENT 1

2024 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT LIST

MENDOCINO COUNTY
Continued MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Mendocino Solid Waste Management
Authority (MSWMA)
3rd Thursday of every
other month (varies),
10:00 a.m.

Willits Council Chambers
Solid Waste Director
3200 Taylor Drive
Ukiah, CA 95482
468-9710
County-wide Solid Waste JPA Crane
Sher - Alternate
Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer;
463-6280 [email protected]
Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA)
Board of Directors
Last Wednesday of
month, 1:30 p.m.

Alternating locations - Ukiah Conference
Center or Fort Bragg, or Point Arena
Executive Director
241 Plant Road
Ukiah, CA 95482
462-1422
County-wide bus transportation issues and funding Sher
Duenas - Alternate
Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City
Engineer; 463-6280 [email protected]
Mendocino Youth Project JPA Board of
Directors
3rd Wednesday of
month, 7:45 a.m. 776 S. State Street Conference Room
Mendocino Co. Youth Project
776 S. State Street, Ste. 107
Ukiah, CA 95482
707-463-4915
Targets all youth with a focus on drug and alcohol prevention, healthy alternatives and empowering youth to make healthy choices Cedric Crook, Police Chief
Duenas - Alternate
Cedric Crook, Police Chief; 463-6771;
[email protected]
Russian River Flood Control District
(RRFCD) Liaison
1st Monday of month,
5:30 p.m.
151 Laws Ave.,Suite D
Ukiah, CA
151 Laws Ave., Ukiah, CA 95482;
[email protected]; 462-5278
Proactively manage the water resources of the upper Russian River for the benefit of the people and environment of Mendocino County White/Orozco Sean White, Director of Water Resources;
463-5712 [email protected]
Ukiah Players Theater Board of
Directors
3rd Tuesday of month,
6:00 p.m
1041 Low Gap Rd
Ukiah, CA 95482
462-1210
1041 Low Gap Rd
Ukiah, CA 95482
462-1210
To oversee the activities, organization and purpose of the Ukiah Players Theater
Greg Owen, Airport Manager
(appointed 12/19/18)
Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217
[email protected]
Ukiah Unified School District (UUSD)
Committee Quarterly 511 S. Orchard, Ste. D
Ukiah, CA 95482
511 S. Orchard
Ukiah, CA 95482
Information exchange with UUSD Board Chair, Mayor, Superintendent, and City Manager
Duenas
Rodin - Alternate
Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager
Cedric Crook, Police Chief
Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; 463-6221
[email protected]

REGIONAL MTG DATE/TIME LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Great Redwood Trail Agency Bi-monthly, 3rd
Thursdays, 10:30 a.m. Various Locations - announced
419 Talmage Road, Suite M
Ukiah, CA 95482
463-3280
Provides a unified and revitalized rail infrastructure meeting the freight and passenger needs of the region
Rodin
Duenas - Alternate
Neil Davis, Community Services Director
467-5764 [email protected]
League of California Cities Redwood
Empire Legislative Committee
Prior to Division
Meetings, meets 3x in
person and then via
conference call
Various locations that are announced
Redwood Empire League President;
Public Affairs Program Manager
(916) 658-8243
Elected city officials and professional city staff attend division meetings throughout the year to share what they are doing and advocate for their interests in Sacramento
Duenas
Orozco - Alternate
Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; 463-6221
[email protected]
Russian River Watershed Association
(RRWA)
4th Thursday of month,
9:00 a.m. (only 5 times a
year)
Windsor Town Hall
Russian River Watershed Association
2235 Mercury Way, Suite 105
Santa Rose, CA 95407
[email protected]
707-508-3670 (message only)
Consider issues related to Russian river - plans projects and funding requests
Rodin
Sher - Alternate
Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer;
463-6280 [email protected]
Northern California Power Agency
(NCPA) - Commission
4th Thursday of month,
9:00 a.m. (see NCPA
calendar)
Roseville, CA
and other locations
651 Commerce Drive
Roseville, CA 95678
916-781-4202
Pool of State and local power utilities developing and operating power generation, providing scheduling and related energy services and providing regulatory and legislative support.

Crane - Commissioner
Sher - City Council Alternate
Sauers - Alternate and Commissioner in
absence of Commissioner Crane
Cindi Sauers - Electric Utility Director;
463-6286 [email protected]
Northern California Power Agency
(NCPA) – Lodi Energy Center (LEC)
Appointment
2nd Monday of month,
10:00 AM
Lodi, CA and other locations
651 Commerce Drive
Roseville, CA 95678
916-781-4299
Committee oversees the operation, maintenance and expenditures of the LEC 300 MW generating project.

Sauers – Project Participate
Appointee
Cindy Sauers, Electric Utility Director,
463-6286, [email protected]
Transmission Agency of Northern
California (TANC)
4th Wednesday of
month, 10 a.m. 35 Iron Point Circle Suite 225 Folsom, CA 35 Iron Point Cir #225
Folsom, CA 95630
916-852-1673; [email protected]
Provide electric transmission to its Member utilities through transmission line ownership or contract arrangements.

Crane
Sauers - Alternate
Cindi Sauers - Electric Utility Director;
463-6286 [email protected]

STANDING COMMITTEES MTG DATE/TIME LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Diversity and Equity TBD Virtual Meeting Room
(link to be created)
Civic Center
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
Improve diversity and equity in the City’s workforce and municipal services Orozco/Duenas Traci Boyl, City Manager's Office Management
Analyst; 467-5720; [email protected]
Fire Executive Committee
2nd Tue, every other
month beginning in
January; 5:00 p.m.

Ukiah Valley Conference Center,
200 S. School Street
Ukiah, CA
Civic Center
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
[email protected]
Per the recently adopted agreement between the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley Fire Protection District Orozco/Sher
Doug Hutchison, Fire Chief; 463-6263;
[email protected]
Countywide Oversight Board to the
RDA Successor Agencies
4th Thursday of January,
4:00 p.m.; meets annually
Ukiah Valley Conference Center,
200 S. School Street
Ukiah, CA
City of Ukiah
ATTN: City Clerk
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
Oversee and direct the Successor Agencies of the former redevelopment agencies
Crane
Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance; 463-6220
[email protected]
Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217,
[email protected]
Water Executive Committee
(Ukiah Valley Water Authority)
1st Tue of each month
at 6:00 p.m.

Ukiah Valley Conference Center,
200 S. School Street
Ukiah, CA
City of Ukiah
ATTN: Sean White
300 Seminary Ave.

Ukiah, CA 95482
Oversight of UVWA; set annual budget for the combined water system; Manage rates and collect levies; modify existing water rights for the provision of water service; mediation and dispute resolution; Crane/Orozco
Sean White, Director of Water Resources;
463-5712 [email protected]
Updated: 6/6/2024

COMMITTEE ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT
Electric Grid Operational Improvements Crane/Orozco Cindy Sauers, Electric Utility Director; 463-629586 [email protected]
Trench Cut Policy Development Crane Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463- 6280 [email protected]
Advance Planning & Policy for Sphere of Influence
(SOI), Municipal Service Review (MSR), Annexation,
Tax Sharing, Detachment, and Out of Area Service
Agreements
Crane/Rodin
Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
463-6219 [email protected]
UVSD/ City Relations
Ad hoc committee to address specific issues with the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District, including discussion of overall sewer system service delivery policies, operating policy revisions, potential revisions to the current Operating Agreement, and cost sharing
Crane/Orozco
Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance;
463-6220 [email protected]
Sean White, Water Resources Director
463-5712 [email protected]
Orr Street Bridge Corridor Rodin/Sher Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463- 6280 [email protected]
Complete Streets Rodin/Crane
Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-
6280 [email protected]
Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager
467-5793 [email protected]
Neil Davis, Community Services Director
467-5764 [email protected]
Special Districts (Water District Consolidation) Orozco/Crane Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467-5793 [email protected]
Corp Yard Planning Crane/Orozco Jason Benson, Senior Civil Engineer 463-6284 [email protected]
Mendocino County Courthouse Project and Reuse Sher/Orozco Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467-5793 [email protected]
Climate Action Plan
Will coordinate with the Community Development Director to identify and assign representation to each of the identified categories, and also coordinate with the Community
Development Director and the Climate Action Plan Working Group related to other outreach efforts during the development of the draft municipal Climate Action Plan related to the 2040 General Plan
Sher/Duenas
Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
463-6219 [email protected]
City's 150-Year Anniversary Planning Orozco/Rodin Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467-5793 [email protected]
Zoning Reform
(previously was the Community Development Fee Review
ad hoc)
function is to explore creation of a new ministerial zoning permit and identify additional zoning streamlining and reform efforts to provide better and more consistent development outcomes Crane/Orozco
Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
463-6219 [email protected]
Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA)
Steering Committee
assist in the creation of the 2025 CHNA Report for the
communities served by the three Adventist Health hospitals in Mendocino County. providing insight, identifying, gathering and analyzing the health needs of our community. Additionally Rodin/Sher
Jeremy Malin, NP
Director of Community Health Analytics
Adventist Health Howard Memorial
Adventist Health Ukiah Valley
Adventist Health Mendocino Coast
978-289-3330; [email protected]
Parks & Recreation Special District Exploration Rodin/Orozco Neil Davis, Community Services Director 467-5764 [email protected]
Downtown Zoning code Crane/Rodin Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director 463-6219 [email protected]
TOT 3% Tax Measure Material Development Rodin/Sher Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467-5793 [email protected]
City Council Handbook Review and Update Sher Kristine Lawler, City Clerk 463-6217; [email protected]
2024 AD HOC COMMITTEES
Updated: 7/19/2024