Agenda packet — Union City City Council, November 14, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

AGENDA

CITY OF UNION CITY/

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI, Mayor
GARY SINGH, Vice Mayor (District 1)
JAMIE PATIÑO,Councilmember (District 2)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, November 14, 2023
7:00 PM
City Hall- Council Chamber
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.a. Pledge of Allegiance

1.b. Roll Call

2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None

3. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3.a. Proclamation Recognizing November As Sikh American Awareness And Appreciation Month

3.b. Proclamation Recognizing November As Native American Heritage Month

3.c. Proclamation Recognizing United Against Hate Week
November 12 – 18, 2023

4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
An individual speaker shall have three minutes to address the Council on non-agenda items under the Oral Communications section of the agenda. The Chair may, in their discretion, lower the City Council/RSA Agenda 1 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
time limit to less than three minutes based on the number of speakers and/or business to be conducted by the City Council.

Members of the public who wish to speak to the Council under the first Oral Communications section are requested to complete a speaker card, giving their name and city of residence. If a speaker wants further notification from the City, the speaker may include a mailing address. Neither a speaker card or identification of name, city of residence or mailing address are required to provide public comment but are requested for record keeping purposes.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by one motion. If discussion is required on a specific item, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered separately.

5.a. Waived Further Reading of Proposed Ordinance
(This permits reading the title only in lieu of reciting the entire text of any proposed Ordinance.)

5.b. Adopt A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Union City Authorizing An Amendment To The Classification And Compensation Plan To Revise The Salary Schedule In
Conformance With California Code Of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 And An Amendment To The Authorized Positions List To Authorize One Full-Time Homeless Program Outreach Worker Position In Lieu Of The Current .65 FTE Homeless Program Outreach Worker Position

5.c. Adopt A Resolution Approving An Amendment To The
Classification And Compensation Plan To Update The Class Specification For The Classification Of Neighborhood
Preservation Specialist

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None

7. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

7.a. Receive Report On Community Survey Polling Results And Provide Policy Direction On Potential Revenue Measures And Next Steps

7.b. Receive Report On The Status Of The BART Pedestrian AtGrade Crossing Project, City Project No. 14-14, On The Oakland Subdivision Tracks Located Adjacent To The Union City BART Station And Other Required Railroad Safety
Improvements, Including Decoto Road At-Grade Crossing And The Closure Of "I" Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing

7.c. Adopt A Resolution Designating The Voting Delegate And Alternate Voting Delegate(s) For The National League Of Cities – City Summit 2023 On November 16-18, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 2 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

8. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -
None

9. AUTHORITIES AND AGENCIES - None

10. CITY COMMISSION / COMMITTEE REPORTS - None

11. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL

12. GOOD OF THE ORDER

13. CLOSED SESSION - None

14. ADJOURNMENT

MEETING INFORMATION
Unless otherwise provided, the City Council's regular meetings are held in person on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. inside the Council Chamber at City Hall, 34009 AlvaradoNiles Road, Union City CA 94587. The City continues to offer an opportunity to observe Council meetings via Zoom at: https://unioncity-org.zoom.us/j/81719037355 Passcode: u8SH9cH^ Meetings are broadcast live through UCTV Channel 15 and via live stream at:
https://unioncity.org/199/City-Meetings-Video
Members of the public will not have the ability to provide comment via Zoom except under limited circumstances specified below. The ability to observe remotely as identified above is predicated on the technology being available and functioning without technical difficulties. Should the remote platform(s) not be available, or become non-functioning, or should the City Council otherwise encounter technical difficulties that makes the platform(s) unavailable, the City Council will proceed with the items of business in person unless otherwise prohibited by law.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of City Council members relating to each item of business referred to on this agenda are available for review on the City's website at www.unioncity.org or during regular business hours in the Office of the City Clerk located at 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City CA 94587.

In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (510) 675-5448. Notification 36 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City also provides closed captioning of all its Regular City Council Meetings for the hearing impair.

ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
City Council/RSA Agenda 3 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
In Person Public Comment: Members of the public may address the Council on a matter on the agenda or during the Public Input portion of the meeting. Members who wish to speak are requested to complete a speaker card, giving their name and city of residence. If a speaker wants further notification from the City, the speaker may include a mailing address. Neither a speaker card nor identification of name, city of residence or mailing address are required to provide public comment but are requested for record keeping purposes.

Written Comment: To provide written comment on an item on the agenda or to address the Council about an issue during Public Comment, you may send an email to [email protected]. Please include the phrase "public comment" in the subject line and note the agenda item number that you want to address. Written comments will be e-mailed to the City Council and made publicly available.

Public Comment via Zoom: As indicated above, the public cannot address the Council via Zoom unless the City is required to provide such opportunity pursuant to AB 2449. In the event that members of the public are allow to participate via Zoom pursuant to AB 2449, the Mayor will make an announcement at the beginning of the meeting. Raise your virtual hand to notify the host that you would like to speak during the item that you wish to speak on.

CITY COUNCIL NORMS AND GUIDELINES (Resolution No. 6129-23; Adopted May 23, 2023) The City Council of the City of Union City comply with the following norms:

1. We conduct ourselves in a professional manner, treat everyone with respect, and act with high integrity, always putting the interests of the City of Union City ahead of self-interests in accordance with our code of ethics.

2. We respect the Council-Manager form of government, and do not interfere with the City Manager's role or any professional duties of City staff.

3. We recognize that matters of confidential nature are to be kept private and undisclosed.

4. We respect each other's opinions and are supportive of each other's work advocating for the City, and we ensure that all voices are heard. We do not criticize others for having a different point of view, and we agree to disagree respectfully.

5. We understand that the City Council acts as a body, all members are equal, and policy direction is only given by a majority vote of the City Council. Once a decision is made, all members of the City Council must respect the City Council's direction.

6. We will be prepared for City Council meetings and ask our questions of the City Manager in advance so we can avoid surprising City staff at meetings.

7. We do not criticize City staff publicly or to others and will refrain from directing them. Instead, we will take our concerns and questions privately to the City Manager.

City Council/RSA Agenda 4 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

8. We will govern on an at-large basis, although elected by districts. We will maintain a citywide perspective and consider the needs and interests of the entire community.

9. We will continue to allocate resources based on long-term strategic priorities and efforts, with consideration of citywide service levels and financial capacity.

10. We understand customer service is the priority and each member of the City Council will help constituents regardless of the district in which they reside or from which a Councilmember themselves is elected.

11. We recognize the significant importance of attendance and participation at City Council meetings in proceeding with City business. All members of the City Council should endeavor to miss no more than two regular meetings per calendar year absent extraordinary circumstances. Members of the City Council should, absent unforeseen circumstances, provide a minimum of sixty days' notice to the City Council of planned absences during the Good of the Order or Items Referred by Council portion of the City Council agenda, as appropriate.

May these Council Norms be administered and enforced in the following manner:

1. Councilmembers have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met by the Council, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government.

2. The Mayor and the Council have the responsibility to intervene when action of its members are in violation of Council Norms.

3. The City Council can review and revise the Council Norms as needed.

4. During City Council discussions, deliberations, and proceedings, the Mayor is designated with the primary responsibility to ensure that Councilmembers adhere to the Council Norms.

CERTIFICATION OF MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA POSTING
This notice/agenda was posted at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting date, in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, on the City's Website and on the bulletin board of City Hall.

City Council/RSA Agenda 5 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Agenda Item
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Proclamation - Sikh American Awareness and Appreciation Month Attachment City Council/RSA Agenda 6 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
In Honor and Recognition of November 2023 as
Sikh American Awareness and Appreciation Month

WHEREAS, Sikhism is a monotheistic faith founded by Guru Nanak, in the historic Punjab region of modern-day India and Pakistan, over 5 centuries ago; and WHEREAS, Sikhism is the fifth largest religion in the world and today, there are more than 25 million Sikhs worldwide with an estimated 700,000 Sikhs living in the United States; and
WHEREAS, Sikhs first entered California in 1899, through the Angel Island Immigration Station in San Francisco, California; and
WHEREAS, Sikh Americans have made important contributions to the social, economic, political and cultural fabric of Union City, California and the United States of America; and WHEREAS, Sikh Americans have served in the United States military during both World Wars and through all subsequent wars until the present day; and WHEREAS, Sikh pioneers initially worked on railroad projects and in lumber mills; and in 1910 turned to farming in the Sacramento, San Joaquin and Imperial Valleys; and WHEREAS, Sikhs and Sikh Americans now have also excelled as doctors, attorneys, engineers, scientists, judges, politicians, artists, teachers, and small business owners, in security services and in transportation services, and in other notable capacities; and WHEREAS, On October 14, 1912, the first Sikh house of worship (Gurdwara) in the United States was founded in Stockton, which has been designated a California Historical Landmark; and
WHEREAS, There are over 200 Gurdwaras in the United States of which there are 32 known Gurdwaras in California including the Gurdwara Sahib of Fremont and San Jose, two of the largest Gurdwaras in North America; and
WHEREAS, Worldwide, Sikhs practice the 3 pillars of Sikhism everyday: Kirat Karo (earn an honest living), Naam Japo (remembrance of God) and Wand Shako (share/support others in need); and
WHEREAS, The faithful service of the Sikh American community to this city, state and country merits appreciation as an integral thread in the fabric of American plurality.

City Council/RSA Agenda 7 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Union City recognizes November 2023 as Sikh American Awareness and Appreciation month and today, seeks to recognize the diversity of its community and afford all residents the opportunity to better understand, recognize, and appreciate the rich history and shared experiences of Sikhs and Sikh Americans.

DATED: November 14, 2023
CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI, Mayor
GARY SINGH, Vice Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Councilmember
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember
JEFF WANG, Councilmember
City Council/RSA Agenda 8 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Agenda Item
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Proclamation - November NativeAmerican Heritage Month Attachment City Council/RSA Agenda 9 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROCLAMATION
In Honor and Recognition of November 2023
As Native American Heritage Month

WHEREAS, in 1916, Red Fox James, a member of the Blackfeet Nation, rode horseback from state to state to gather endorsements from 24 state governments to establish a day to honor American Indians. This resulted in the very first American Indian Day which took place on the second Saturday in May 1916; and WHEREAS, Native American Heritage Month first evolved from "American Indian Week,” which President Reagan proclaimed on the week of November 23-30, 1986; and WHEREAS, In 1990, President George H. W. Bush approved a joint resolution designating November 1990 as National American Indian Heritage Month, which was later changed to Native American Heritage Month under President Barack Obama; and
WHEREAS, there were already 50 million Native Americans and Indigenous peoples living in the Americas by the time Columbus made his way across the ocean, 10 million of whom were living in what was to become the United States. To say that Columbus discovered the "new world" disregards the rich cultures and complex societies that had already existed here for generations; and
WHEREAS, today there are over 9 million Native Americans and Native Alaskans living in the United States today; and
WHEREAS with 575 federally recognized tribes and many more vying for recognition, there are a vast array of cultures that are as unique as the people they represent. From artwork and books and literature to cuisine and music, there is much to appreciate and learn.

WHEREAS, Union City is within the ancestral land of the Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation. This land was and continues to be of great importance to its people. We have a responsibility to acknowledge with respect and reverence for the Lisjan Nation, who have stewarded this land throughout the generations, while not forgetting the colonization of this land.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Union City does hereby proclaim November 2023 as Native American Heritage Month and encourages all residents, as inhabitants of this land, to explore relationships with the original peoples of this land, and to seek out opportunities to better understand, recognize, and appreciate the rich history and shared experiences of Indigenous Americans.

DATED: November 14, 2023
CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI, Mayor
GARY SINGH, Vice Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Councilmember
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember
JEFF WANG, Councilmember
City Council/RSA Agenda 10 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Agenda Item
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
In Recognition of United Against Hate Week Resolution
City Council/RSA Agenda 11 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROCLAMATION

In Recognition of United Against Hate Week
November 12 – November 18, 2023
WHEREAS, there has been an alarming increase in fringe ideologies using hatred as a means of intimidation and scare tactics; and
WHEREAS, numerous attacks of violence and terror have divided the country and world, from the invasion of Ukraine, the attacks in Israel and Palestine, the rise in mass shootings, inflammatory racial bigotry, combined with the actions and rhetoric of white supremacists, and hate groups, have fueled the normalization of hateful and racist discourse; and WHEREAS, attacks on Black, AAPI, Indigenous people, immigrants, Muslims, people of color, women, Jewish people, the LGBTQ+, and our most vulnerable are now commonplace, resulting in an uptick in hate crimes and the open promotion of xenophobic ideas; and WHEREAS, places of worship including synagogues, churches, mosques, festivals, shopping centers, public signs, and government buildings have become targets of white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and others espousing hatred; and WHEREAS, Union City is one of the most diverse cities in California, comprised of many different cultural, racial, ethnic, and religious groups who live together in peace and are tolerant of one another. A unique feature of our small-knit community is that we are unified through our diversity, and our community shares a commitment to our core values of safety, tolerance, and caring; and
WHEREAS, on May 2017, the City Council unanimously voted to declare Union City a Compassionate City to protect our residents; and
WHEREAS, our policy and practice of treating everyone equally, without regard to race, color, national origin, or immigration status, is unchanged, and will remain as strong as it has always been; and
City Council/RSA Agenda 12 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
WHEREAS, on September 26, 2018, selected leaders, and community members from half a dozen cities across the Bay Area gathered to launch We Stand United Against Hate, a campaign to stop the hate and implicit biases that are dangerous threat to the safety and civility our neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, to further counter the divide currently facing our nation, cities across the Bay Area are organizing “United Against Hate Week” that will take place November 12 - November 18, 2023; and
WHEREAS, events will focus on breaking through positionality, communicating in conflict, and working together to achieve common goals promoting education, compassion, and cooperation, which are key to embracing differences between people.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Union City proclaims November 12 – November 18, 2023, as “United Against Hate Week in Union City” and will support and encourage appropriate educational and community events.

DATED:
________________________
CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI, Mayor
________________________
GARY SINGH, Vice Mayor
________________________
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember
________________________
JEFF WANG, Councilmember
________________________
JAIME PATIÑO, Councilmember
City Council/RSA Agenda 13 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 11/14/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JASON CASTLEBERRY, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION

CITY AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND

COMPENSATION PLAN TO REVISE THE SALARY SCHEDULE IN

CONFORMANCE WITH CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE
2, SECTION 570.5 AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE AUTHORIZED

POSITIONS LIST TO AUTHORIZE ONE FULL-TIME HOMELESS

PROGRAM OUTREACH WORKER POSITION IN LIEU OF THE
CURRENT .65 FTE HOMELESS PROGRAM OUTREACH WORKER

POSITION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing an amendment to the Classification and Compensation Plan to revise the Salary Schedule and an amendment to the Authorized Positions List to authorize one full-time equivalent (FTE) Homeless Program Outreach Worker position in lieu of the current .65 FTE Homeless Program Outreach Worker position.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Goal C., Strategy 3: Assess needs and identify appropriate services to support unhoused individuals and families in collaboration with community organizations and the County of Alameda, as well as develop internal response protocols and a communications strategy to provide regular status updates to City Council, commissions and the general public.

BACKGROUND
The biennial operating budget currently provides the Community and Recreation Services Department with authorization for .65 FTE Homeless Program Outreach Worker position. With the additional support of the recently awarded Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) grant funding, the Homeless Program Outreach Worker position will increase by .35 FTE, making it full-time. This position provides critical support to homeless individuals and the Union City CAREavan safe parking program.

City Council/RSA Agenda 14 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

DISCUSSION
The City Council previously authorized a part-time .65 FTE Homeless Program Outreach Worker position (currently filled) to assist in providing outreach and support to the CAREavan program, unhoused individuals, and encampments. The Homeless Program Outreach Worker assesses needs and identifies appropriate community resources to best support personal growth and success to unhoused individuals and families. Given the specific grant funding available to increase this part-time position to a full-time position, staff recommends that the City Council amend the Classification and Compensation Plan and Authorized Position List to increase the part-time Homeless Program Outreach Worker position to full-time. The position remains grant funded, and continuance of the position is dependent on the availability of funding in the future.

FISCAL IMPACT
The additionalcost to add .35 FTE to this position to make it a full-time position is $27,000 and this additional cost will be funded from the $626,469 HHAP Grant funds recently awarded to the City for FY 2023-2024.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing an amendment to the Classification and Compensation Plan to revise the Salary Schedule and an amendment to the Authorized Positions List to authorize one full-time Homeless Program Outreach Worker position in lieu of the current .65 FTE Homeless Program Outreach Worker position.

Prepared by:

Jason Castleberry, Human Resources Director
Submitted by:

Jason Castleberry, Human Resources Director
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Resolution -Amending Classification and Compensation Plan and theAuthorized Positions List
Resolution
Exhibit A - Classification and Compensation Plan Exhibit Exhibit B-Authorized Positions List Exhibit
City Council/RSA Agenda 15 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-21

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND

COMPENSATION PLAN TO REVISE THE SALARY SCHEDULE IN
CONFORMANCE WITH CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5 AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LIST

TO AUTHORIZE ONE FULL-TIME HOMELESS PROGRAM OUTREACH WORKER POSITION IN LIEU OF THE CURRENT .65 FTE HOMELESS PROGRAM

OUTREACH WORKER POSITION
WHEREAS, the Community and Recreation Services Department currently has a .65 FTE Homeless Program Outreach Worker position, which assists in providing outreach and support to the CAREavan program, unhoused individuals and encampments.

WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved a part-time Homeless Program Outreach Worker position to assist with the CAREavan program, unhoused individuals and encampments; and
WHEREAS, grant funding is now available to increase this part-time position to a fulltime position; and WHEREAS, staff is seeking an amendment to the Classification and Compensation Plan and Authorized Positions List to provide for the full-time Homeless Program Outreach Worker position.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes an amendment to the Classification and Compensation Plan to revise the Salary Schedule (attached as Exhibit A) and the Authorized Positions List (attached as Exhibit B) to authorize one full-time Homeless Program Outreach Worker position in lieu of the current .65 FTE Homeless Program Outreach Worker position, effective November 14, 2023.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of November 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_______________________________

CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI
Mayor
City Council/RSA Agenda 16 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ________________________________ JENNIFER PHAN KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
Acting City Clerk City Attorney
City Council/RSA Agenda 17 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Amendment #1: June 20, 2023 - Reso. No. 6146-23
City of Union City
Salary Schedule
FY 2023-2024
Effective: November 27, 2023
Amendment #2: July 11, 2023 - Reso. No. 6158-23
Amendment #3: July 25, 2023 - Reso. No. 6174-23
Amendment #4: July 25, 2023 - Reso. No. 6175-23
Amendment #5: October 10, 2023 - Reso. No. 6210-23
Amendment #6: November 14, 2023 - Reso. No. XXXX-23
City Council/RSA Agenda 18 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Bargaining Unit Job Code Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 FULL-TIME (monthly rates shown )
City Council 10010 Mayor 2,437
City Council 10020 Council Member 1,625
City Manager 20010 City Manager 26,492
UNREPRESENTED Min. Range Max.

Dept. Heads 20015 Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer 17,514 21,049 Dept. Heads 20020 Deputy City Manager 16,874 20,240
Dept. Heads 20470 Community & Recreation Services Director 16,455 19,729 Dept. Heads 20515 Economic & Community Development Director 16,455 19,729 Dept. Heads 20275 Finance Director 16,455 19,729
Dept. Heads 20280 Human Resources Director 16,455 19,729 Dept. Heads 20290 Information Technology Director 16,455 19,729 Dept. Heads 40010 Police Chief 21,496 22,356 23,250 24,180 25,147 Dept. Heads 20710 Public Works Director 16,765 20,108
Unrep'd. Mgmt. 21050 Assistant to the City Manager 14,210 17,064 Unrep'd. Mgmt. 21185 Chief Human Resources Officer 14,922 17,918 Unrep'd. Mgmt. 21315 Chief Technology Officer 14,922 17,918 Unrep'd. Mgmt. 20030 City Clerk 11,797 12,336 12,905 13,501 14,127 Unrep'd. Mgmt. 21410 Deputy Police Chief 19,484 20,397 21,358 22,362 23,423 Unrep'd. Mgmt. 20145 Human Resources Analyst I 7,987 8,337 8,706 9,093 9,500 Unrep'd. Mgmt. 20155 Human Resources Analyst II 9,766 10,208 10,671 11,154 11,664 Unrep'd. Mgmt. 20180 Human Resources Manager 12,471 13,046 13,645 14,278 14,940 Unrep'd. Mgmt. 20930 Supervising Construction Inspector 10,128 10,587 11,070 11,577 12,109 Unrep'd. Non-Mgmt. 21010 Administrative Specialist - Confidential 6,823 7,166 7,524 7,901 8,297 Unrep'd. Non-Mgmt. 30800 Human Resources Technician 7,195 7,556 7,925 8,330 8,742

MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES' GROUP (MEG)
Management 20360 Budget Manager/Purchasing Agent 11,878 12,425 12,996 13,598 14,228 Management 20590 Chief Building Official/Senior Plans Examiner 13,666 14,294 14,958 15,650 16,381 Management 20810 City Engineer 15,353 16,069 16,821 17,607 18,435 Management 20505 Clinical Supervisor 9,126 9,530 9,954 10,399 10,866 Management 20650 Communications & Marketing Manager 11,375 11,937 12,499 13,053 13,616 Management 20450 Community & Recreation Services Manager 11,980 12,530 13,110 13,717 14,355 Management 20508 Community Services Manager 10,938 11,435 11,956 12,503 13,078 Management 20800 Cyber Security Manager 12,315 12,870 13,451 14,049 14,690 Management 20630 Economic Development Manager 11,876 12,462 13,049 13,628 14,215 Management 20600 Environmental Program Manager 12,285 12,852 13,446 14,070 14,725 Management 20911 Fleet Supervisor 10,658 11,145 11,652 12,188 12,748 Management 20540 Housing & Community Development Manager 12,183 12,745 13,333 13,951 14,600 Management 20310 Information Technology Manager 14,210 14,870 15,565 16,296 17,064 Management 20500 Intervention Counselor I 7,202 7,516 7,841 8,186 8,546 Management 20080 Management Analyst I 7,987 8,337 8,706 9,093 9,500 Management 20090 Management Analyst II 9,766 10,208 10,671 11,154 11,664 Management 20100 Management Analyst III 11,878 12,425 12,996 13,598 14,228 Management 20560 Planning Manager 13,015 13,614 14,245 14,905 15,600 Management 20860 Principal Civil Engineer 12,726 13,314 13,932 14,582 15,260 Management 20920 Public Works Grounds Supervisor 10,658 11,145 11,652 12,188 12,748 Management 20910 Public Works Streets Supervisor 10,658 11,145 11,652 12,188 12,748 Management 20730 Public Works Superintendent 12,388 12,957 13,559 14,187 14,850 Management 20700 Recycling & Solid Waste Program Manager 11,066 11,573 12,106 12,664 13,250 Management 20620 Redevelopment Manager 12,285 12,852 13,446 14,070 14,725 Management 20370 Revenue Collections Manager 11,878 12,425 12,996 13,598 14,228 Management 20350 Supervising Accountant 11,087 11,593 12,124 12,682 13,267 Management 20912 Transit Manager 11,980 12,530 13,110 13,717 14,355 City of Union City - Salary Schedule
City Council/RSA Agenda 19 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Bargaining Unit Job Code Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7

POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (PMA)
Police Mgmt. 40020 Police Captain 17,690 18,524 19,398 20,316 21,281 Police Mgmt. 40040 Police Lieutenant 14,997 15,731 16,503 17,320 18,178 Police Mgmt. 40045 Police Commander 15,742 16,508 17,315 18,168 19,064

POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION (POA)
UCPOA 40220 Community Relations Officer 7,050 7,403 7,772 8,162 8,571 UCPOA 40095 Community Resources Coordinator 6,117 6,424 6,745 7,081 7,435 UCPOA 40090 Community Service Aide 6,035 6,304 6,587 6,885 7,199 UCPOA 40240 Confidential Operations Assistant 7,022 7,374 7,743 8,129 8,537 UCPOA 40080 Crime Analyst 8,571 9,000 9,449 9,923 10,418 UCPOA 40070 Dispatch Clerk 6,673 6,857 7,165 7,492 7,833 UCPOA 40170 Dispatch Clerk Trainee 5,778
UCPOA 40241 Executive Assistant to the Police Chief 7,022 7,374 7,743 8,129 8,537 UCPOA 40063 Personnel and Training Supervisor 7,050 7,403 7,772 8,162 8,571 UCPOA 40130 Police Corporal 11,867
UCPOA 40230 Police Department Office Coordinator 6,074 6,380 6,698 7,033 7,386 UCPOA 40140 Police Office Assistant 5,537 5,814 6,105 6,410 6,731 UCPOA 40050 Police Officer 8,620 9,018 9,426 9,827 10,321 10,838 11,379 UCPOA 40150 Police Officer Recruit I 6,907
UCPOA 40160 Police Officer Recruit II 8,187
UCPOA 40060 Police Records Supervisor 7,050 7,403 7,772 8,162 8,571 UCPOA 40030 Police Sergeant 11,650 12,173 12,714 13,349 14,017 UCPOA 40120 Prisoner Transportation Officer 6,035 6,304 6,587 6,885 7,199 UCPOA 40100 Property & Evidence Specialist 6,035 6,304 6,587 6,885 7,199 UCPOA 40065 Property & Evidence Supervisor 7,050 7,403 7,772 8,162 8,571 UCPOA 40110 Public Services Officer I 6,117 6,424 6,745 7,081 7,435 UCPOA 40180 Public Services Officer II 6,440 6,763 7,101 7,454 7,828 POA REPRESENTED PART-TIME (hourly rates shown)
UCPOA PT 40070 Dispatcher Clerk (PT) 38.50 39.56 41.34 43.22 45.19 UCPOA PT 40120 Prisoner Transportation Officer (PT) 34.82 36.37 38.00 39.72 41.53 UCPOA PT 40181 Public Services Officer I (PT) 35.29 37.06 38.91 40.85 42.89 UCPOA PT 40182 Public Services Officer II (PT) 37.15 39.02 40.97 43.00 45.16 PD UNREPRESENTED PART-TIME (hourly rates shown) Min. Range Max.

Unrep. Police PT 60120 Police Cadet 16.39 17.20 18.06
Unrep. Police PT 60150 Police Officer Trainee 44.00

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES' GROUP (PEG)
Professionals 30060 Accountant 8,005 8,404 8,816 9,266 9,726 Professionals 30250 Assistant Planner 7,119 7,474 7,845 8,239 8,650 Professionals 30230 Associate Planner 8,283 8,695 9,128 9,586 10,063 Professionals 30053 Building Code Compliance Coordinator 10,703 11,261 11,822 12,380 12,939 Professionals 30090 Case Manager 6,337 6,653 6,985 7,335 7,702 Professionals 30600 Economic Development Coordinator 9,603 10,088 10,539 11,024 11,510 Professionals 30275 Emergency Services Coordinator 8,810 9,250 9,705 10,192 10,702 Professionals 30150 Engineer I (Civil) 7,853 8,241 8,655 9,090 9,543 Professionals 30130 Engineer II (Civil) 8,722 9,158 9,604 10,093 10,594 Professionals 30120 Engineer III (Civil) 9,971 10,469 10,986 11,536 12,113 Professionals 30030 Environmental Analyst I 7,060 7,414 7,783 8,175 8,584 Professionals 30031 Environmental Analyst II 7,969 8,389 8,831 9,295 9,785 Professionals 30040 Environmental Programs Inspector 9,533 10,035 10,562 11,116 11,703 Professionals 30095 Homeless Program Coordinator/Case Manager 6,179 6,510 6,840 7,172 7,540 Professionals 30080 Intervention Counselor 6,570 6,899 7,245 7,608 7,988 Professionals 30185 Lead Construction Inspector 9,605 10,069 10,498 10,997 11,498 Professionals 30066 Lead Payroll Technician 7,891 8,248 8,677 9,105 9,605 Professionals 30065 Payroll Technician 7,503 7,877 8,263 8,684 9,114 City of Union City - Salary Schedule
City Council/RSA Agenda 20 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Bargaining Unit Job Code Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES' GROUP (PEG) (CONT.)
Professionals 30100 Recreation Supervisor 7,906 8,302 8,716 9,151 9,608 Professionals 30020 Senior Accountant 9,255 9,727 10,213 10,718 11,247 Professionals 30055 Senior Building/Code Compliance Inspector 9,533 10,035 10,562 11,116 11,703 Professionals 30210 Senior Planner 9,574 10,076 10,609 11,165 11,753 Professionals 30400 Senior Recreation Supervisor 9,284 9,736 10,211 10,710 11,232 Professionals 30260 Senior Systems Analyst 10,703 11,261 11,822 12,380 12,939 Professionals 30310 Sustainability Analyst I 6,958 7,305 7,670 8,054 8,456 Professionals 30320 Sustainability Analyst II 8,214 8,624 9,056 9,509 9,984 Professionals 30265 Systems Analyst 10,264 10,778 11,317 11,882 12,476 Professionals 30501 Transit Planner - Assistant 6,836 7,177 7,533 7,911 8,307 Professionals 30502 Transit Planner - Associate 8,186 8,593 9,021 9,474 9,943 Professionals 30503 Transit Planner - Senior 9,574 10,076 10,609 11,165 11,753 Professionals 30270 Web and Database Administrator 9,793 10,282 10,797 11,337 11,904

SERVICE EMPLOYEES' INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU)
SEIU 1021 50520 Administrative Assistant I 5,664 5,924 6,196 6,486 6,783 SEIU 1021 50525 Administrative Assistant II 6,196 6,486 6,783 7,099 7,428 SEIU 1021 50530 Administrative Assistant III 6,783 7,099 7,428 7,776 8,142 SEIU 1021 50290 Building/Code Compliance Inspector 8,172 8,551 8,943 9,353 9,780 SEIU 1021 50201 Building/Code Compliance Inspector - Trainee 7,173 7,508 7,852 8,212 8,589 SEIU 1021 50255 Building Permit Technician 6,485 6,811 7,139 7,469 7,795 SEIU 1021 50251 Building Permit Technician II 7,051 7,393 7,754 8,132 8,529 SEIU 1021 50566 Communications Coordinator 5,817 6,085 6,364 6,662 6,967 SEIU 1021 50256 Community Development Technician 6,356 6,676 6,997 7,320 7,639 SEIU 1021 50351 Facility Maintenance Worker 6,295 6,578 6,875 7,191 7,515 SEIU 1021 50080 Finance Specialist I 5,181 5,412 5,673 5,940 6,216 SEIU 1021 50090 Finance Specialist II 5,673 5,940 6,216 6,516 6,823 SEIU 1021 50100 Finance Specialist III 6,216 6,516 6,823 7,148 7,491 SEIU 1021 50539 Homeless Program Outreach Worker 4,552 4,780 5,019 5,271 5,534 SEIU 1021 50332 Lead Facilities Maintenance Worker 7,377 7,713 8,068 8,426 8,818 SEIU 1021 50323 Lead Vehicle Heavy Equipment Mechanic 7,747 8,099 8,471 8,848 9,259 SEIU 1021 50361 Leisure Services Maintenance Worker 5,338 5,605 5,886 6,180 6,489 SEIU 1021 50360 Maintenance I - Parks & Grounds 5,757 6,029 6,310 6,605 6,919 SEIU 1021 50330 Maintenance I - Streets 6,045 6,330 6,626 6,936 7,265 SEIU 1021 50342 Maintenance II - Parks & Grounds 6,373 6,673 6,984 7,314 7,659 SEIU 1021 50320 Maintenance II - Streets 6,693 7,008 7,333 7,678 8,042 SEIU 1021 50325 Maintenance Trainee - Parks & Grounds 4,933 5,162 5,404 5,654 5,918 SEIU 1021 50350 Maintenance Trainee - Streets 4,933 5,162 5,404 5,654 5,918 SEIU 1021 50200 Neighborhood Preservation Specialist 7,527 7,876 8,237 8,615 9,008 SEIU 1021 50500 Office Specialist I 4,465 4,670 4,876 5,094 5,325 SEIU 1021 50505 Office Specialist II 4,864 5,082 5,313 5,555 5,805 SEIU 1021 50510 Office Specialist III 5,308 5,551 5,801 6,068 6,346 SEIU 1021 50560 Preschool Site Supervisor II 4,457 4,680 4,915 5,161 5,418 SEIU 1021 50291 Public Works Inspector 7,908 8,352 8,756 9,179 9,622 SEIU 1021 50370 Public Works Maintenance II 6,373 6,673 6,984 7,314 7,659 SEIU 1021 50110 Recreation Administrative Technician 6,966 7,314 7,679 8,064 8,467 SEIU 1021 50160 Recreation Program Coordinator 6,340 6,650 6,977 7,323 7,681 SEIU 1021 50600 Recycling Programs Coordinator 6,542 6,860 7,198 7,556 7,925 SEIU 1021 50380 Special Projects Coordinator 5,930 6,210 6,499 6,804 7,127 SEIU 1021 50538 Street Outreach Worker 4,552 4,780 5,019 5,271 5,534 SEIU 1021 50341 Street Sweeper Operator 6,448 6,739 7,043 7,367 7,699 SEIU 1021 50400 Technical Support Specialist I 6,063 6,368 6,674 6,979 7,246 SEIU 1021 50405 Technical Support Specialist II 6,711 7,055 7,398 7,741 8,047 SEIU 1021 50517 Transit Coordinator 7,461 7,810 8,209 8,554 8,956 SEIU 1021 50321 Vehicle Heavy Equipment Mechanic 6,917 7,230 7,561 7,903 8,269 SEIU 1021 50326 Vehicle Equipment Technician 5,475 5,747 6,035 6,337 6,653 SEIU 1021 50536 Youth Employment Coordinator 6,079 6,383 6,703 7,037 7,389 SEIU 1021 50537 Youth Services Specialist 6,200 6,511 6,837 7,178 7,537 City of Union City - Salary Schedule
City Council/RSA Agenda 21 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Bargaining Unit Job Code Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 SEIU REPRESENTED PART-TIME (hourly rates shown)
SEIU 1021 PT 50373 Facilities Maintenance Attendant (PT) 27.29 28.65 30.09 31.60 33.19 SEIU 1021 PT 50533 CRS Program Manager (PT) 21.57 22.63 23.77 24.94 26.17 SEIU 1021 PT 50500 Office Specialist I (PT) 25.76 26.94 28.13 29.39 30.72 SEIU 1021 PT 50505 Office Specialist II (PT) 28.06 29.32 30.65 32.05 33.49 SEIU 1021 PT 50510 Office Specialist III (PT) 30.62 32.02 33.47 35.01 36.61 SEIU 1021 PT 50561 Preschool Site Supervisor I (PT) 20.85 21.88 22.98 24.12 25.32 SEIU 1021 PT 50532 Program Coordinator (PT) 36.58 38.36 40.25 42.25 44.31 SEIU 1021 PT 50531 Senior Recreation Leader 17.71 18.62 19.54 20.52 21.57 SEIU 1021 PT 50539 Homeless Program Outreach Worker (PT) 26.26 27.58 28.96 30.41 31.92 SEIU 1021 PT 50538 Street Outreach Worker (PT) 26.26 27.58 28.96 30.41 31.92 UNREPRESENTED PART-TIME (hourly rates shown)
Unrep. Gen. PT 60069 CRS Program Manager (PT) 19.93 20.92 21.97 23.07 24.22 Unrep. Gen. PT 60100 Preschool Aide (PT) 15.50 16.27
Unrep. Gen. PT 60090 Preschool Teacher (PT) 17.71 18.60 19.53 20.51 21.53 Unrep. Gen. PT 60072 Program Coordinator (PT) 23.25 24.41 25.63 26.91 28.26 Unrep. Gen. PT 60232 Recreation Aide (PT) 15.50 16.27
Unrep. Gen. PT 60233 Recreation Leader (PT) 16.61 17.44 18.31 19.22 20.19 Unrep. Gen. PT 60300 Seasonal Maintenance Worker (PT) 22.14 Unrep. Gen. PT 60234 Senior Recreation Leader (PT) 17.71 18.60 19.53 20.51 21.53 Unrep. Gen. PT 60600 Intern (PT) 15.50 56.46
Unrep. Gen. PT 60570 Project Specialist (PT) 15.50 116.00 Unrep. Gen. PT 60400 Retired Annuitant (PT) 15.50 133.00 City of Union City - Salary Schedule
City Council/RSA Agenda 22 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TITLE GRADE 6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025
MAYOR 10010 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
COUNCIL MEMBER 10020 4.00 - 4.00 - 4.00
CITY MANAGER 20010 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER 20020 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CITY CLERK 20030 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 20090 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
MANAGEMENT ANALYST III 20100 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST I 20145 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II 20155 - - - - -
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER 20180 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
FINANCE DIRECTOR 20275 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR 20280 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
INFO TECHNOLOGY DIRECTOR 20290 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
BUDGET MANAGER/PURCHASING AGENT 20360 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 REVENUE COLLECTION MANAGER 20370 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CRS MANAGER 20450 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CRS DIRECTOR 20470 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
INTERVENTION COUNSELOR I 20500 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CLINICAL SUPERVISOR 20505 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER 20508 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ECONOMIC & COMM DEV DIR 20515 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
HCD MANAGER 20540 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
PLANNING MANAGER 20560 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL/SR PLANS EXAMIN 20590 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER 20600 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER 20630 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE MGR 20700 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 20710 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT 20730 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CYBER SECURITY MANAGER 20800 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CITY ENGINEER 20810 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER 20860 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
STREETS SUPERVISOR 20910 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
FLEET SUPERVISOR 20911 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
TRANSIT MANAGER 20912 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
GROUNDS SUPERVISOR 20920 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALIST-CONFIDENTIAL 21010 1.50 - 1.50 - 1.50 ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER 21050 1.00 (1.00) - - -
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 21185 - - - - -
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER 21315 - - - - -
SENIOR ACCOUNTANT 30020 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS INSPECT 30040 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00 BLDG/CODE COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR 30053 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 (UPDATED 11-14-23)

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LISTING
FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025

Page 1 ends

City Council/RSA Agenda 23 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
(UPDATED 11-14-23)

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LISTING
FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025
TITLE GRADE 6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025
SR BLDG/CODE COMPLIANCE INSPEC 30055 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 ACCOUNTANT 30060 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
PAYROLL TECHNICIAN 30065 - - - - -
LEAD PAYROLL TECHNICIAN 30066 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
INTERVENTION COUNSELOR (PEG) 30080 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CASE MANAGER 30090 3.00 - 3.00 - 3.00
HOMELESS PROG COORDINATOR/CASE MGR 30095 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 RECREATION SUPERVISOR 30100 3.00 - 3.00 - 3.00
ENGINEER III (CIVIL) 30120 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ENGINEER II (CIVIL) 30130 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ENGINEER I (CIVIL) 30150 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
LEAD CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 30185 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
SENIOR PLANNER 30210 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ASSOCIATE PLANNER 30230 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
ASSISTANT PLANNER 30250 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
SENIOR SYSTEMS ANALYST 30260 3.00 - 3.00 - 3.00
SYSTEMS ANALYST 30265 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
WEB & DATABASE ADMINISTRATOR 30270 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR 30275 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 SUSTAINABILITY ANALYST II 30320 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
SENIOR RECREATION SUPERVISOR 30400 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ASSISTANT TRANSIT PLANNER 30501 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ASSOCIATE TRANSIT PLANNER 30502 0.60 - 0.60 - 0.60
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR 30600 - 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN 30800 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
POLICE CHIEF 40010 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF 40015 - 1.00 1.00 (1.00) -
POLICE CAPTAIN 40020 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
POLICE SERGEANT 40030 13.00 - 13.00 - 13.00
POLICE LIEUTENANT 40040 6.00 - 6.00 - 6.00
POLICE OFFICER 40050 58.00 - 58.00 - 58.00
POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR 40060 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
PERSONNEL & TRAINING SUPERVISOR 40063 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 PROPERTY SUPERVISOR 40065 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
CRIME ANALYST 40080 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
COMMUNITY SERVICE AIDE 40090 3.00 - 3.00 - 3.00
COMMUNITY RESOURCES COORDINATOR 40095 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 PROPERTY & EVIDENCE SPECIALIST 40100 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00 POLICE OFFICE ASSISTANT 40140 6.00 - 6.00 - 6.00
PUBLIC SERVICES OFFICER II 40180 3.00 - 3.00 - 3.00
POLICE DEPT OFFICE COORDINATOR 40230 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 CONFIDENTL OPERATION ASSISTANT 40240 3.00 - 3.00 - 3.00 FINANCE SPECIALIST III 50100 4.00 - 4.00 - 4.00
RECREATION ADMINISTRATIVE TECH 50110 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00

Page 2 ends

City Council/RSA Agenda 24 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
(UPDATED 11-14-23)

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LISTING
FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025
TITLE GRADE 6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025
RECREATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR 50160 4.00 - 4.00 - 4.00 NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 50200 - 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 BUILDING PERMIT TECHNICIAN II 50251 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECH 50256 0.50 - 0.50 - 0.50
BLDG/CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 50290 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 50291 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
MAINTENANCE II - STREETS 50320 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
VEHICLE HEAVY EQUIP MECHANIC 50321 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
VEHICLE EQUIP TECHNICIAN 50326 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
MAINTENANCE I - STREETS 50330 6.00 - 6.00 - 6.00
LEAD FACILITIES MAINTENANCE WORKER 50332 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 STREET SWEEPER OPERATOR 50341 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
MAINTENANCE II - PARKS & GROUN 50342 5.00 - 5.00 - 5.00 MAINTENANCE TRAINEE-STREETS 50350 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
FACILITY MAINTENANCE WORKER 50351 3.00 (1.00) 2.00 - 2.00 MAINTENANCE I - PARKS & GROUND 50360 13.00 - 13.00 - 13.00 LEISURE SERVICES MAINT WORKER 50361 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE II 50370 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
FACILITIES MAINT ATTENDANT 50373 0.50 - 0.50 - 0.50
SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR 50380 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
TECHNICAL SUPPORT SPECIALIST II 50405 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00 OFFICE SPECIALIST I 50500 1.50 - 1.50 - 1.50
OFFICE SPECIALIST II 50505 1.95 - 1.95 - 1.95
OFFICE SPECIALIST III 50510 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
TRANSIT ASSISTANT 50515 - - - - -
TRANSIT COORDINATOR 50517 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT I 50520 1.00 0.50 1.50 - 1.50
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT II 50525 8.00 - 8.00 - 8.00
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III 50530 1.50 0.50 2.00 - 2.00 PROGRAM COORDINATOR (SEIU-PT) 50532 2.75 - 2.75 - 2.75
L/S PROGRAM MANAGER (SEIU) 50533 1.25 - 1.25 - 1.25
L/S PROGRAM MANAGER PT (SEIU) 50533 1.50 - 1.50 - 1.50
YOUTH EMPLOYMENT COORD 50536 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
YOUTH SERVICES SPECIALIST 50537 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
STREET OUTREACH WORKER 50538 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
HOMELESS PROGRAM OUTREACH WORKER 50539 0.65 0.35 1.00 - 1.00 PRESCHOOL SITE SUPERVISOR II 50560 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
PRESCHOOL SITE SUPV I 50561 1.25 - 1.25 - 1.25
COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR 50566 1.00 (1.00) - - -
L/S PROGRAM MANAGER (A) 60069 8.19 - 8.19 - 8.19
PROGRAM COORDINATOR (UNREP) 60072 0.97 - 0.97 - 0.97
PRESCHOOL TEACHER 60090 2.39 - 2.39 - 2.39
PRESCHOOL AIDE 60100 0.53 - 0.53 - 0.53
POLICE CADET 60120 4.78 - 4.78 - 4.78

Page 3 ends

City Council/RSA Agenda 25 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
(UPDATED 11-14-23)

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LISTING
FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025
TITLE GRADE 6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025
RECREATION AIDE 60232 3.67 - 3.67 - 3.67
RECREATION LEADER 60233 25.10 (12.35) 12.75 4.03 16.78
SENIOR RECREATION LEADER 60234 9.17 - 9.17 - 9.17
SEASONAL MAINTENANCE WORKER 60300 1.59 - 1.59 - 1.59
PROJECT SPECIALIST 60570 7.82 - 7.82 - 7.82
INTERN 60600 0.50 - 0.50 - 0.50
PLANNING COMMISSIONER 60700 0.06 - 0.06 - 0.06
TOTAL 326.20 (11.00) 315.20 3.03 318.23
6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025
1101-CITY COUNCIL 5.00 5.00 5.00
1201-CITY MANAGER 9.50 (2.00) 7.50 7.50
1400-CITY CLERK 2.00 2.00 2.00
1500-FINANCE 13.00 13.00 13.00
1600-HUMAN RESOURCES SERVICES 4.50 4.50 4.50
1700-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 9.00 0.50 9.50 9.50 2100-POLICE 107.78 1.00 108.78 (1.00) 107.78
3000-PUBLIC WORKS 57.69 (0.50) 57.19 57.19
5000-COMMUNITY & RECREATION SERVICES 98.18 (12.00) 86.18 4.03 90.21 6000-ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 19.56 2.00 21.56 21.56 TOTAL 326.20 (11.00) 315.20 3.03 318.23
FY 2023-2024 CHANGES APPROVED WITH THE FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025 BUDGET ADOPTION:

Subtract: Unfilled Assistant to City Manager position has been unfunded for FY 2023-2024 & FY 2024-2025 Add: 1 FTE Economic Development Coordinator
Add: 1 FTE Deputy Police Chief (for FY 2023-2024 only)
Add: 1 FTE Neighborhood Preservation Specialist
Subtract: Unfilled Facility Maintenace Worker position has been unfunded for FY 2023-2024 & FY 2024-2025 Add: .50 FTE Admin Assistant I position in ITS
Add: .50 FTE Admin Assistant III position to PW to increase to 1 FTE Subtract: Unfilled Communications Coordinator position has been unfunded for FY 2023-2024 & FY 2024-2025 Subtract: Multiple FTE changes in Seasonal positions
FY 2024-2025 CHANGES APPROVED WITH THE FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025 BUDGET ADOPTION:

Subtract: 1 FTE Deputy Police Chief (for FY 2023-2024 only) Add: Multiple FTE changes in Seasonal positions
FY 2023-2024 CHANGES APPROVED DURING FY 2023-2024:
11-14-23: Add .35 to the PT Homeless Program Outreach Worker position to make it FT Department

Page 4 ends

City Council/RSA Agenda 26 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 11/14/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JASON CASTLEBERRY, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN TO UPDATE THE CLASS

SPECIFICATION FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD

PRESERVATION SPECIALIST
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve an amendment to the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan, Authorized Positions List and update the class specification of Neighborhood Preservation Specialist.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This program supports Goal B. Governance and Organization Effectiveness of the strategic plan in aligning critical city services with current staffing levels.

BACKGROUND
As part of a review of the Neighborhood Preservation Specialist job duties and the needs of the City's Economic and Community Development Department relative to align position functions with appropriate qualifications and experience expectations, staff recommends minor modifications to the classification specification/job description.

DISCUSSION
The proposed classification specification includes slight modifications to align functions, qualifications, experience and skills expected for the role. The goal is to provide clarity on essential functions, qualifications and certifications during the next recruitment. The City has met and conferred with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) regarding the proposed revisions to the class specification. No change to the current salary range is recommended at this time. The Economic and Community Development Department worked with the Human Resources Department to ensure the class specification is updated prior to future recruitments.

City Council/RSA Agenda 27 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for the position specification changes being proposed.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to approve an amendment to the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan to update the class specification/job description of Neighborhood Preservation Specialist.

Prepared by:

Jason Castleberry, Human Resources Director
Submitted by:

Jason Castleberry, Human Resources Director
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Attachment 1 - Classification and Compensation Plan (Reference only) Attachment Attachment 2 -Authorized Positions List (Reference only) Attachment Resolution -Amending Job Specification for Neighborhood Preservation Specialist
Resolution
Class Specification (Redlined) Exhibit
Class Specification (Clean) Exhibit
City Council/RSA Agenda 28 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Amendment #2: July 11, 2023 - Reso. No. 6158-23
Amendment #3: July 25, 2023 - Reso. No. 6174-23
Amendment #4: July 25, 2023 - Reso. No. 6175-23
Amendment #5: October 10, 2023 - Reso. No. 6210-23
Amendment #6: November 14, 2023 - Reso. No. XXXX-23
Amendment #7: November 14, 2023 - Reso. No. XXXX-23
City of Union City
Salary Schedule
FY 2023-2024
Effective: November 27, 2023
Amendment #1: June 20, 2023 - Reso. No. 6146-23
City Council/RSA Agenda 29 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Bargaining Unit Job Code Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 FULL-TIME (monthly rates shown )
City Council 10010 Mayor 2,437
City Council 10020 Council Member 1,625
City Manager 20010 City Manager 26,492
UNREPRESENTED Min. Range Max.

MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES' GROUP (MEG)
Management 20360 Budget Manager/Purchasing Agent 11,878 12,425 12,996 13,598 14,228 Management 20590 Chief Building Official/Senior Plans Examiner 13,666 14,294 14,958 15,650 16,381 Management 20810 City Engineer 15,353 16,069 16,821 17,607 18,435 Management 20505 Clinical Supervisor 9,126 9,530 9,954 10,399 10,866 Management 20650 Communications & Marketing Manager 11,375 11,937 12,499 13,053 13,616 Management 20450 Community & Recreation Services Manager 11,980 12,530 13,110 13,717 14,355 Management 20508 Community Services Manager 10,938 11,435 11,956 12,503 13,078 Management 20800 Cyber Security Manager 12,315 12,870 13,451 14,049 14,690 Management 20630 Economic Development Manager 11,876 12,462 13,049 13,628 14,215 Management 20600 Environmental Program Manager 12,285 12,852 13,446 14,070 14,725 Management 20911 Fleet Supervisor 10,658 11,145 11,652 12,188 12,748 Management 20540 Housing & Community Development Manager 12,183 12,745 13,333 13,951 14,600 Management 20310 Information Technology Manager 14,210 14,870 15,565 16,296 17,064 Management 20500 Intervention Counselor I 7,202 7,516 7,841 8,186 8,546 Management 20080 Management Analyst I 7,987 8,337 8,706 9,093 9,500 Management 20090 Management Analyst II 9,766 10,208 10,671 11,154 11,664 Management 20100 Management Analyst III 11,878 12,425 12,996 13,598 14,228 Management 20560 Planning Manager 13,015 13,614 14,245 14,905 15,600 Management 20860 Principal Civil Engineer 12,726 13,314 13,932 14,582 15,260 Management 20920 Public Works Grounds Supervisor 10,658 11,145 11,652 12,188 12,748 Management 20910 Public Works Streets Supervisor 10,658 11,145 11,652 12,188 12,748 Management 20730 Public Works Superintendent 12,388 12,957 13,559 14,187 14,850 Management 20700 Recycling & Solid Waste Program Manager 11,066 11,573 12,106 12,664 13,250 Management 20620 Redevelopment Manager 12,285 12,852 13,446 14,070 14,725 Management 20370 Revenue Collections Manager 11,878 12,425 12,996 13,598 14,228 Management 20350 Supervising Accountant 11,087 11,593 12,124 12,682 13,267 Management 20912 Transit Manager 11,980 12,530 13,110 13,717 14,355 City of Union City - Salary Schedule
City Council/RSA Agenda 30 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Bargaining Unit Job Code Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7

Unrep. Police PT 60120 Police Cadet 16.39 17.20 18.06
Unrep. Police PT 60150 Police Officer Trainee 44.00

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES' GROUP (PEG)
Professionals 30060 Accountant 8,005 8,404 8,816 9,266 9,726 Professionals 30250 Assistant Planner 7,119 7,474 7,845 8,239 8,650 Professionals 30230 Associate Planner 8,283 8,695 9,128 9,586 10,063 Professionals 30053 Building Code Compliance Coordinator 10,703 11,261 11,822 12,380 12,939 Professionals 30090 Case Manager 6,337 6,653 6,985 7,335 7,702 Professionals 30600 Economic Development Coordinator 9,603 10,088 10,539 11,024 11,510 Professionals 30275 Emergency Services Coordinator 8,810 9,250 9,705 10,192 10,702 Professionals 30150 Engineer I (Civil) 7,853 8,241 8,655 9,090 9,543 Professionals 30130 Engineer II (Civil) 8,722 9,158 9,604 10,093 10,594 Professionals 30120 Engineer III (Civil) 9,971 10,469 10,986 11,536 12,113 Professionals 30030 Environmental Analyst I 7,060 7,414 7,783 8,175 8,584 Professionals 30031 Environmental Analyst II 7,969 8,389 8,831 9,295 9,785 Professionals 30040 Environmental Programs Inspector 9,533 10,035 10,562 11,116 11,703 Professionals 30095 Homeless Program Coordinator/Case Manager 6,179 6,510 6,840 7,172 7,540 Professionals 30080 Intervention Counselor 6,570 6,899 7,245 7,608 7,988 Professionals 30185 Lead Construction Inspector 9,605 10,069 10,498 10,997 11,498 Professionals 30066 Lead Payroll Technician 7,891 8,248 8,677 9,105 9,605 Professionals 30065 Payroll Technician 7,503 7,877 8,263 8,684 9,114 City of Union City - Salary Schedule
City Council/RSA Agenda 31 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Bargaining Unit Job Code Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES' GROUP (PEG) (CONT.)
Professionals 30100 Recreation Supervisor 7,906 8,302 8,716 9,151 9,608 Professionals 30020 Senior Accountant 9,255 9,727 10,213 10,718 11,247 Professionals 30055 Senior Building/Code Compliance Inspector 9,533 10,035 10,562 11,116 11,703 Professionals 30210 Senior Planner 9,574 10,076 10,609 11,165 11,753 Professionals 30400 Senior Recreation Supervisor 9,284 9,736 10,211 10,710 11,232 Professionals 30260 Senior Systems Analyst 10,703 11,261 11,822 12,380 12,939 Professionals 30310 Sustainability Analyst I 6,958 7,305 7,670 8,054 8,456 Professionals 30320 Sustainability Analyst II 8,214 8,624 9,056 9,509 9,984 Professionals 30265 Systems Analyst 10,264 10,778 11,317 11,882 12,476 Professionals 30501 Transit Planner - Assistant 6,836 7,177 7,533 7,911 8,307 Professionals 30502 Transit Planner - Associate 8,186 8,593 9,021 9,474 9,943 Professionals 30503 Transit Planner - Senior 9,574 10,076 10,609 11,165 11,753 Professionals 30270 Web and Database Administrator 9,793 10,282 10,797 11,337 11,904

SERVICE EMPLOYEES' INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU)
SEIU 1021 50520 Administrative Assistant I 5,664 5,924 6,196 6,486 6,783 SEIU 1021 50525 Administrative Assistant II 6,196 6,486 6,783 7,099 7,428 SEIU 1021 50530 Administrative Assistant III 6,783 7,099 7,428 7,776 8,142 SEIU 1021 50290 Building/Code Compliance Inspector 8,172 8,551 8,943 9,353 9,780 SEIU 1021 50201 Building/Code Compliance Inspector - Trainee 7,173 7,508 7,852 8,212 8,589 SEIU 1021 50255 Building Permit Technician 6,485 6,811 7,139 7,469 7,795 SEIU 1021 50251 Building Permit Technician II 7,051 7,393 7,754 8,132 8,529 SEIU 1021 50566 Communications Coordinator 5,817 6,085 6,364 6,662 6,967 SEIU 1021 50256 Community Development Technician 6,356 6,676 6,997 7,320 7,639 SEIU 1021 50351 Facility Maintenance Worker 6,295 6,578 6,875 7,191 7,515 SEIU 1021 50080 Finance Specialist I 5,181 5,412 5,673 5,940 6,216 SEIU 1021 50090 Finance Specialist II 5,673 5,940 6,216 6,516 6,823 SEIU 1021 50100 Finance Specialist III 6,216 6,516 6,823 7,148 7,491 SEIU 1021 50539 Homeless Program Outreach Worker 4,552 4,780 5,019 5,271 5,534 SEIU 1021 50332 Lead Facilities Maintenance Worker 7,377 7,713 8,068 8,426 8,818 SEIU 1021 50323 Lead Vehicle Heavy Equipment Mechanic 7,747 8,099 8,471 8,848 9,259 SEIU 1021 50361 Leisure Services Maintenance Worker 5,338 5,605 5,886 6,180 6,489 SEIU 1021 50360 Maintenance I - Parks & Grounds 5,757 6,029 6,310 6,605 6,919 SEIU 1021 50330 Maintenance I - Streets 6,045 6,330 6,626 6,936 7,265 SEIU 1021 50342 Maintenance II - Parks & Grounds 6,373 6,673 6,984 7,314 7,659 SEIU 1021 50320 Maintenance II - Streets 6,693 7,008 7,333 7,678 8,042 SEIU 1021 50325 Maintenance Trainee - Parks & Grounds 4,933 5,162 5,404 5,654 5,918 SEIU 1021 50350 Maintenance Trainee - Streets 4,933 5,162 5,404 5,654 5,918 SEIU 1021 50200 Neighborhood Preservation Inspector 7,527 7,876 8,237 8,615 9,008 SEIU 1021 50500 Office Specialist I 4,465 4,670 4,876 5,094 5,325 SEIU 1021 50505 Office Specialist II 4,864 5,082 5,313 5,555 5,805 SEIU 1021 50510 Office Specialist III 5,308 5,551 5,801 6,068 6,346 SEIU 1021 50560 Preschool Site Supervisor II 4,457 4,680 4,915 5,161 5,418 SEIU 1021 50291 Public Works Inspector 7,908 8,352 8,756 9,179 9,622 SEIU 1021 50370 Public Works Maintenance II 6,373 6,673 6,984 7,314 7,659 SEIU 1021 50110 Recreation Administrative Technician 6,966 7,314 7,679 8,064 8,467 SEIU 1021 50160 Recreation Program Coordinator 6,340 6,650 6,977 7,323 7,681 SEIU 1021 50600 Recycling Programs Coordinator 6,542 6,860 7,198 7,556 7,925 SEIU 1021 50380 Special Projects Coordinator 5,930 6,210 6,499 6,804 7,127 SEIU 1021 50538 Street Outreach Worker 4,552 4,780 5,019 5,271 5,534 SEIU 1021 50341 Street Sweeper Operator 6,448 6,739 7,043 7,367 7,699 SEIU 1021 50400 Technical Support Specialist I 6,063 6,368 6,674 6,979 7,246 SEIU 1021 50405 Technical Support Specialist II 6,711 7,055 7,398 7,741 8,047 SEIU 1021 50517 Transit Coordinator 7,461 7,810 8,209 8,554 8,956 SEIU 1021 50321 Vehicle Heavy Equipment Mechanic 6,917 7,230 7,561 7,903 8,269 SEIU 1021 50326 Vehicle Equipment Technician 5,475 5,747 6,035 6,337 6,653 SEIU 1021 50536 Youth Employment Coordinator 6,079 6,383 6,703 7,037 7,389 SEIU 1021 50537 Youth Services Specialist 6,200 6,511 6,837 7,178 7,537 City of Union City - Salary Schedule
City Council/RSA Agenda 32 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Bargaining Unit Job Code Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 SEIU REPRESENTED PART-TIME (hourly rates shown)
SEIU 1021 PT 50373 Facilities Maintenance Attendant (PT) 27.29 28.65 30.09 31.60 33.19 SEIU 1021 PT 50533 CRS Program Manager (PT) 21.57 22.63 23.77 24.94 26.17 SEIU 1021 PT 50500 Office Specialist I (PT) 25.76 26.94 28.13 29.39 30.72 SEIU 1021 PT 50505 Office Specialist II (PT) 28.06 29.32 30.65 32.05 33.49 SEIU 1021 PT 50510 Office Specialist III (PT) 30.62 32.02 33.47 35.01 36.61 SEIU 1021 PT 50561 Preschool Site Supervisor I (PT) 20.85 21.88 22.98 24.12 25.32 SEIU 1021 PT 50532 Program Coordinator (PT) 36.58 38.36 40.25 42.25 44.31 SEIU 1021 PT 50531 Senior Recreation Leader 17.71 18.62 19.54 20.52 21.57 SEIU 1021 PT 50539 Homeless Program Outreach Worker (PT) 26.26 27.58 28.96 30.41 31.92 SEIU 1021 PT 50538 Street Outreach Worker (PT) 26.26 27.58 28.96 30.41 31.92 UNREPRESENTED PART-TIME (hourly rates shown)
Unrep. Gen. PT 60069 CRS Program Manager (PT) 19.93 20.92 21.97 23.07 24.22 Unrep. Gen. PT 60100 Preschool Aide (PT) 15.50 16.27
Unrep. Gen. PT 60090 Preschool Teacher (PT) 17.71 18.60 19.53 20.51 21.53 Unrep. Gen. PT 60072 Program Coordinator (PT) 23.25 24.41 25.63 26.91 28.26 Unrep. Gen. PT 60232 Recreation Aide (PT) 15.50 16.27
Unrep. Gen. PT 60233 Recreation Leader (PT) 16.61 17.44 18.31 19.22 20.19 Unrep. Gen. PT 60300 Seasonal Maintenance Worker (PT) 22.14 Unrep. Gen. PT 60234 Senior Recreation Leader (PT) 17.71 18.60 19.53 20.51 21.53 Unrep. Gen. PT 60600 Intern (PT) 15.50 56.46
Unrep. Gen. PT 60570 Project Specialist (PT) 15.50 116.00 Unrep. Gen. PT 60400 Retired Annuitant (PT) 15.50 133.00 City of Union City - Salary Schedule
City Council/RSA Agenda 33 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TITLE GRADE 6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LISTING
FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025

Page 1 ends

City Council/RSA Agenda 34 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
(UPDATED 11-14-23)

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LISTING
FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025
TITLE GRADE 6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

Page 2 ends

City Council/RSA Agenda 35 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
(UPDATED 11-14-23)

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LISTING
FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025
TITLE GRADE 6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025
RECREATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR 50160 4.00 - 4.00 - 4.00 NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION INSPECTOR 50200 - 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 BUILDING PERMIT TECHNICIAN II 50251 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECH 50256 0.50 - 0.50 - 0.50
BLDG/CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 50290 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 50291 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
MAINTENANCE II - STREETS 50320 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
VEHICLE HEAVY EQUIP MECHANIC 50321 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
VEHICLE EQUIP TECHNICIAN 50326 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
MAINTENANCE I - STREETS 50330 6.00 - 6.00 - 6.00
LEAD FACILITIES MAINTENANCE WORKER 50332 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 STREET SWEEPER OPERATOR 50341 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
MAINTENANCE II - PARKS & GROUN 50342 5.00 - 5.00 - 5.00 MAINTENANCE TRAINEE-STREETS 50350 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
FACILITY MAINTENANCE WORKER 50351 3.00 (1.00) 2.00 - 2.00 MAINTENANCE I - PARKS & GROUND 50360 13.00 - 13.00 - 13.00 LEISURE SERVICES MAINT WORKER 50361 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE II 50370 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
FACILITIES MAINT ATTENDANT 50373 0.50 - 0.50 - 0.50
SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR 50380 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
TECHNICAL SUPPORT SPECIALIST II 50405 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00 OFFICE SPECIALIST I 50500 1.50 - 1.50 - 1.50
OFFICE SPECIALIST II 50505 1.95 - 1.95 - 1.95
OFFICE SPECIALIST III 50510 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
TRANSIT ASSISTANT 50515 - - - - -
TRANSIT COORDINATOR 50517 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT I 50520 1.00 0.50 1.50 - 1.50
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT II 50525 8.00 - 8.00 - 8.00
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III 50530 1.50 0.50 2.00 - 2.00 PROGRAM COORDINATOR (SEIU-PT) 50532 2.75 - 2.75 - 2.75
L/S PROGRAM MANAGER (SEIU) 50533 1.25 - 1.25 - 1.25
L/S PROGRAM MANAGER PT (SEIU) 50533 1.50 - 1.50 - 1.50
YOUTH EMPLOYMENT COORD 50536 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
YOUTH SERVICES SPECIALIST 50537 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
STREET OUTREACH WORKER 50538 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00
HOMELESS PROGRAM OUTREACH WORKER 50539 0.65 0.35 1.00 - 1.00 PRESCHOOL SITE SUPERVISOR II 50560 2.00 - 2.00 - 2.00
PRESCHOOL SITE SUPV I 50561 1.25 - 1.25 - 1.25
COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR 50566 1.00 (1.00) - - -
L/S PROGRAM MANAGER (A) 60069 8.19 - 8.19 - 8.19
PROGRAM COORDINATOR (UNREP) 60072 0.97 - 0.97 - 0.97
PRESCHOOL TEACHER 60090 2.39 - 2.39 - 2.39
PRESCHOOL AIDE 60100 0.53 - 0.53 - 0.53
POLICE CADET 60120 4.78 - 4.78 - 4.78

Page 3 ends

City Council/RSA Agenda 36 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
(UPDATED 11-14-23)

AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LISTING
FY 2023-2024 AND FY 2024-2025
TITLE GRADE 6-30-2023
FY 2023-2024

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024
FY 2024-2025

CHANGES

Page 4 ends

City Council/RSA Agenda 37 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-21

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND

COMPENSATION PLAN TO UPDATE THE CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR THE

CLASSIFICATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION SPECIALIST
WHEREAS, the City has undertaken an inquiry and recommends that the City Council update the class specification for the position of Neighborhood Preservation Specialist; and WHEREAS, City staff have undertaken an analysis of necessary updates to the classification and compensation plan to update the class specification for the classification of Neighborhood Preservation Specialist; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has identified in the Strategic Plan Goal B, Governance and Organization Effectiveness to align critical city services with current staffing levels by ensuring the accuracy and clarity for the Neighborhood Preservation Specialist class specification; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or her designee has met and conferred in good faith with the representatives of all bargaining units related to the above matters.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby approves the updated Neighborhood Preservation Specialist class specification, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, effective November 14, 2023.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to take such further actions as may be necessary to implement the proposed revisions to the class specification for the classification of Neighborhood Preservation Specialist.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of November 2023, by the following vote:
_______________________________

CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ________________________________ JENNIFER PHAN KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
Acting City Clerk City Attorney
City Council/RSA Agenda 38 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
1 NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION

SPECIALISTINSPECTOR
Bargaining Unit: SEIU Local 1021
Class Code: 50200
Created/Updated:
4/1/200111/14/2023
DEFINITION:

Under the general supervision, the Neighborhood Preservation Inspector. This is a flexibly staffed classification in the Economic and Community Development Department. Members of this classification seekensures compliance with applicable sections of the State, Federal, and Municipal Ccodes, ordinances, and resolutions in such relevant areas, such as property maintenance, abandoned vehicles, planning, zoning, signs, housing, community nuisance, business licenses, and related areas.

Incumbents may also be involved in a variety of assignments in policy, and other areas, including projects to promote affordable housing. This is a classification in the Economic and Community Development Department.

CLASS CHARACTERISITICS:

The Neighborhood Preservation Specialist Inspector is the full journey-level classification. This position requires experience in both Municipal and Zoning Codes and Regulations. Employees at this level are expected to work with individuals and community groupsproperty owners independently and to coordinate City resources to solve neighborhood issues.

EXAMPLES OF DUTIES (illustrative only):
• Work closely with homeowners, businesses and community groups to enhance and preserve the quality of neighborhoods through public relations, community building, and educational and code enforcement activities. and businesses to in the name of good customer service and achieveing compliance. • Interpret ordinances, policies and procedures, and code enforcement concepts. • Prepare reports and recommendations on code enforcement matters, and gain voluntary compliance.
• Coordinate actions with other departments or jurisdictions. • Prepare reports, legal documents, policy reports, and letters. • Prepare case information and present evidence at appeal hearings and other legal proceedings.
• Inspect and investigate land use, and site and environmental conditions. • Prepare computerized record of deficiencies noted, and compliance achieved. • Initiate remedial action.
• Perform tasks in policy, and current and environmental planning. • Work as a vital team member in the Community Development Department to promote housing rehabilitation and affordable housing.
• Other related duties as assigned.

City Council/RSA Agenda 39 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
2 QUALIFICATIONS:

EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE:

Any combination of education, training, and experience that would likely provide the required knowledge, skills, and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge, skills and abilities would be:

One (1) year of experience performing the duties of a Neighborhood Preservation Specialist (Code Enforcement Officer) such as inspections, citations, and notifications.

AND
An A.A.ssociate’s Degree (or equivalentequivalenting education or years of experience) from an accredited college in a discipline related to the essential functions of this classification.

OR
Three years of experience performing the duties of a Neighborhood Preservation Specialist (Code Enforcement Officer).

LICENSE AND CERTIFICATIONS:

Possession of a valid California Driver’s license and have a satisfactory driving record.

Certification as a Code Enforcement Officer by an organization recognized by either the ICC or the California Alliance of Code Enforcement Organizations (CACEO). or the California Code Enforcement Corporation (CCEC) or American Association of Code Enforcement (AACE). This certification may be obtained within the first year of employment.

KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES:

Knowledge Of:
• Municipal code enforcement methods and procedures.
• Land use concepts and zoning principles.
• Current trends and developments in the areas of neighborhood preservation programs.
• Codes and methods of enforcement to determine corrective action. • Basic budgetary techniques.
• Effective public and community relations techniques.
• Techniques of negotiations and conflict resolution.
• Research methods and techniques.

City Council/RSA Agenda 40 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
3 • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with individuals and citizens groups, businesses, and other internal and external agencies. • Gathering and analyzing data for the purpose of preparing accurate and concise written and statistical reports.
• Performing mathematical calculations.
• Maintaining computerized and manual data systems.
• Making effective public presentations.
• Communicating effectively.
• Interpreting and implementing assigned rRegulations, policies, and procedures as they are related to the program.
• Interpreting City codes and determining corrective action.

Ability To:
• Process information and data in a relevant manner to reach reasonable conclusions and make practical decisions.
• Apply analytical skills and understand impact and consequences of decisions and actions.Effective public and community relations techniques. • Techniques of negotiations and conflict resolution.
• Research methods and techniques.
• Establish and maintain effective working relationships with individuals and citizens groups, businesses, and other internal and external agencies. • Prepare accurate and concise written and statistical reports.

Process information and data in a relevant manner to reach reasonable conclusions and make practical decisions.

Apply analytical skills and understand impact and consequences of decisions and actions.
• Maintain computerized and manual data systems.
• Communicate effectively.
• Occasionally attend evening meetings.
• Travel to remote sites within the City to conduct inspections. • Work indoors or outdoors in a variety of climatic conditions. • Perform the essential functions of the position.

LICENSE AND CERTIFICATIONS:

Possession of a valid California Driver’s license and have a satisfactory driving record.M WORKING CONDITIONS, ADA AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS:

The City of Union City is an equal opportunity employer. The City of Union City will comply with its obligations under the law to provide equal employment opportunities to qualified individuals with disabilities.

City Council/RSA Agenda 41 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
4 Positions in this class typically require: sitting, stooping, kneeling, crouching, reaching, standing, walking, pushing, pulling, lifting, fingering, grasping, talking, hearing, seeing, and repetitive motions.

Sedentary Work: Exerting up to 10 pounds of force occasionally and/or a negligible amount of force frequently or constantly to lift, carry, push, pull or otherwise move objects. Sedentary work involves sitting most of the time. Jobs are sedentary if walking and standing are required only occasionally and all other sedentary criteria are met.

Incumbents generally work in a typical office environment with adequate light and temperature. They will also need toRegular Ttravel to remote sites within the City to conduct inspections is expected. and .

Work indoors or outdoors in a variety of climatic conditions.

Travel: Positions in this class may require local and statewide travel as necessary.

City Council/RSA Agenda 42 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
1 NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION INSPECTOR
Bargaining Unit: SEIU Local 1021
Class Code: 50200
Updated: 11/14/2023
DEFINITION:

Under general supervision, the Neighborhood Preservation Inspector. ensures compliance with applicable sections of the State, Federal, and Municipal Codes, ordinances, and in relevant areas, such as property maintenance, abandoned vehicles, planning, zoning, signs, community nuisance, and related areas. This is a classification in the Economic and Community Development Department.

CLASS CHARACTERISITICS:

The Neighborhood Preservation Inspector is the full journey-level classification. This position requires experience in both Municipal and Zoning Codes and Regulations.

Employees at this level are expected to work with property owners independently and to coordinate City resources to solve neighborhood issues.

EXAMPLES OF DUTIES (illustrative only):
 Work closely with homeowners and businesses to achieve compliance.  Interpret ordinances, policies and procedures, and code enforcement concepts.  Prepare reports and recommendations on code enforcement matters, and gain voluntary compliance.
 Coordinate actions with other departments or jurisdictions.  Prepare reports, legal documents, and letters.
 Prepare case information and present evidence at appeal hearings and other legal proceedings.
 Inspect and investigate land use, and site and environmental conditions.  Other related duties as assigned.

QUALIFICATIONS:

EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE:

City Council/RSA Agenda 43 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
2 One (1) year of experience performing the duties of a Neighborhood Preservation Specialist (Code Enforcement Officer) such as inspections, citations, and notifications.

AND
An Associate’s Degree (or equivalenting education or years of experience) from an accredited college in a discipline related to the essential functions of this classification.

OR
LICENSE AND CERTIFICATIONS:

Possession of a valid California Driver’s license and have a satisfactory driving record.

Certification as a Code Enforcement Officer by an organization recognized by either ICC or the California Alliance of Code Enforcement Organizations (CACEO).

KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES:

Knowledge Of:
 Municipal code enforcement methods and procedures.
 Land use concepts and zoning principles.
 Current trends and developments in the areas of neighborhood preservation programs.
 Codes and methods of enforcement to determine corrective action.  Regulations, policies, and procedures as they are related to the program.  City codes and determining corrective action.

Ability To:
 Effective public and community relations techniques.
 Techniques of negotiations and conflict resolution.
 Research methods and techniques.
 Establish and maintain effective working relationships with individuals and citizens groups, businesses, and other internal and external agencies.  Prepare accurate and concise written and statistical reports.  Maintain computerized and manual data systems.
 Communicate effectively.

City Council/RSA Agenda 44 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
3 WORKING CONDITIONS, ADA AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS:

Positions in this class typically require: sitting, stooping, kneeling, crouching, reaching, standing, walking, pushing, pulling, lifting, fingering, grasping, talking, hearing, seeing, and repetitive motions.

Incumbents generally work in a typical office environment with adequate light and temperature. Regular travel to remote sites within the City to conduct inspections is expected. Work indoors or outdoors in a variety of climatic conditions.

Travel: Positions in this class may require local and statewide travel as necessary.

City Council/RSA Agenda 45 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 11/14/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JOAN MALLOY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: RECEIVE REPORT ON COMMUNITY SURVEY POLLING RESULTS AND

PROVIDE POLICY DIRECTION ON POTENTIAL REVENUE MEASURES

AND NEXT STEPS
Staff recommends that the City Council receive a report from TeamCivX and Godbe Research, providing an overview of community survey polling results and voter attitudes towards a parcel tax measure to restore and protect public safety services.

Furthermore, staff is requesting that the City Council provide policy direction on next steps as it relates to potential revenue measures in future election cycles.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This item is in alignment with Goal A. Financial Stability and Sustainability of the City Council Strategic Plan. Under GoalA, it is specifically related to the following strategies:

Strategy 1: Develop a comprehensive fiscal sustainability model to address the General Fund’s longterm structural deficit.

Strategy 8: Determine the feasibility of a revenue ballot measure for November 2024 and/or November 2026 to address critical facilities and infrastructure needs.

Strategy 9: Pursue the placement of a voter-approved revenue measure on a ballot to address the funding gap between revenues and expenditures for fundamental public safety and other city services.

Strategy 10: Study the benefits and opportunity to update the City’s business license tax for voter consideration.

BACKGROUND
At the June 13, 2023 study session and public hearing for the FY 2023-2024 and FY 2024-2025 Biennial Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, and review of the long-range financial forecast, the City Council expressed an interest in exploring possible voter-approved revenue measures to address anticipated City Council/RSA Agenda 46 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
future gaps in funding City services, in particular public safety services. While the City currently maintains a healthy General Fund reserve, the rising costs of supplies, equipment, contracts, and employee salaries, and retirement obligations, are projected to adversely impact the General Fund. The rise in expenditures is growing faster than City revenues. The General Fund is projected to fall to the minimum reserve fund balance of twenty percent of its annual operating expenditures by 2028, which is equivalent to approximately ten weeks of operations. The City Council has prudently adopted Financial Principles to maintain a minimum of twenty percent General Fund reserve. In addition, the City Council has identified fiscal stability and sustainability as its primary goal in the Strategic Plan.

Given the City’s long-term financial forecast, on July 11, 2023, the City Counciladopted Resolution No. 6164- 23 authorizing the City to engage TeamCivX in evaluating community support for a potential revenue measure in either the March 2024 primary election or in the November 2024 general election, which included a statistically reliable opinion survey of local voters conducted by Godbe Research.

To support this evaluation process, a City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittee (“Subcommittee”) comprised of Mayor Carol Dutra-Vernaci and Councilmember Jeff Wang was created on August 21, 2023 via Resolution No. 6195-23. The Subcommittee was tasked to analyze and provide recommendations on the potential placement of a revenue measure in 2024 to protect and fund City services. In the initial feasibility assessment, TeamCivX looked at the local political landscape and analyzed recent election results. TeamCivX alongside City staff and the Subcommittee, then explored possible revenue measures and reviewed the community survey that would help the City Council understand voter attitudes toward such measures and determine timing for placement on a future ballot.

DISCUSSION
Community Survey Overview
The community survey that was conducted by Godbe Research assessed voter attitudes and potential support specifically for a parcel tax measure to restore and protect public safety services. The survey occurred between September 6-18, 2023 of likely November 2024 voters in Union City, with a sample size of 448 respondents and a margin of error of ±4.60%. The community survey results are further detailed in Attachment 1 to this report.

The following table summarizes the survey results when proposing a parcel tax measure of $0.18 per building square foot. The same measure was posed three separate times during the survey to gauge:

1. initial support for the measure;

2. interim support and how it fared after informational statements were read describing the purpose of the measure; and

3. final support and how it fared after critical statements were read describing likely arguments against the measure.

MARCH 2024 NOVEMBER 2024
Initial Interim Final Initial Interim Final
Support 45.3% 57.5% 44.2% 52.1% 60.6% 51.6%
Oppose 39.7% 32.1% 38.0% 31.9% 29.4% 32.8%
Don’t Know 15.1% 10.4% 17.8% 16.1% 10.0% 15.6%
Further comparing how a parcel tax measure would perform in March 2024 versus November 2024, three scenarios were tested to determine how support may change when going from $0.18 per building square foot to $0.12 per building square foot to $0.06 per building square foot. Beyond that, the parcel tax measure was then City Council/RSA Agenda 47 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
presented in terms of an annual dollar amount rather than by cents per building square foot.

MARCH 2024 NOVEMBER 2024
$0.18/ft2 $0.12/ft2 $0.06/ft2 $0.18/ft2 $0.12/ft2 $0.06/ft2 Support 45.3% 51.4% 55.1% 52.1% 54.4% 59.0%
Oppose 39.7% 36.5% 35.1% 31.9% 33.9% 30.9%
Don’t
Know

15.1% 12.0% 9.9% 16.1% 11.7% 10.0%
$324/year $216/year $108/year $324/year $216/year $108/year Support 41.8% 51.6% 60.1% 44.4% 54.0% 63.7%
Oppose 49.8% 38.9% 33.4% 46.4% 36.1% 28.4%
Don’t
Know

8.5% 9.5% 6.5% 9.3% 10.0% 7.8%
Lastly, an alternative option was introduced measuring how voters reacted to a parcel tax measure with a 12- year duration instead of one without a sunset date.

MARCH 2024 NOVEMBER 2024
Support 53.6% 56.4%
Oppose 35.3% 32.6%
Don’t Know 11.1% 10.9%
Other notable results from the survey were:

65.4% had a favorable rating of the City’s provision of services, 19.4% had an unfavorable rating of the City’s provision of services, and 15.1% had no opinion/did not know.

49.4% had a favorable rating of the City’s management of public funds, 29.2% had an unfavorable rating of the City’s management of public funds, and 21.4% had no opinion/did not know.

The community survey results are further detailed in Attachment 1 to this report.

Other Considerations
There are two opportunities for placement of a ballot measure in 2024 (the primary election on March 5, 2024 and the general election on November 5, 2024. Article XIII of the California State Constitution requires a simple majority (>50%) voter approval for locally imposed general taxes and a two-thirds supermajority (66.7%) requirement for special taxes. A special tax is a tax earmarked for a specific purpose, such as a Public Safety Parcel Tax. Parcel taxes, non-value-based taxes on real property, would require two-thirds supermajority voter approval. It is also important to note that special taxes can be considered in both a primary and general election, whereas general taxes must be placed before the voters in a regularly scheduled general election.

Existing voter-approved measures for the City of Union City include a Utility Users’ Tax (expires December 2028) and a One-Half Cent Sales Tax (expires April 2035), both of which are considered general taxes. Should the City seek renewal of these measures in the future, a measure would need to be placed before voters no later than 2026 and 2032, respectively.

Findings & Conclusions
Based on analysis of the survey results, pursuing a special tax ballot measure on the March 2024 primary City Council/RSA Agenda 48 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
election would likely not be passed by the required supermajority threshold of 66.7% voter approval. However, should the Council wish to proceed, the proposed measure for the March 2024 primary election would require City Council to adopt a resolution by November 28, 2023 in order for the City Clerk to notify the Alameda County Registrar of Voters by the December 8, 2023 deadline. Additionally, the short timeframe before the March 2024 primary election would limit the amount of community outreach that could be conducted to educate voters on a proposed measure.

Moreover, a parcel tax measure would also better fare if the aggregate cost to a homeowner were under $100 and of limited duration.

Staff is seeking City Council policy direction on how to proceed considering the results of the community survey and in light of these considerations. The City Council may want to consider timing and how to prioritize potential revenue measures in future election cycles (beyond 2024) given the sunset dates of the City’s existing voter-approved measures. Additionally, the City Council previously expressed interest in an update to the Business License Tax, which is being further evaluated by staff and HdL, the City's consultant.

Decision points for the City Council include:

1. Whether or not to proceed with a Public Safety Parcel Tax in the March 2024 primary election.

2. Consider targeting the November 2024 generalelection and focus on an adjustment to the City's existing general tax measures that are in place, including the Business License Tax or the Utility Users’ Tax. As noted, a general tax only requires voter approval of >50% to succeed.

Staff recognizes that the City Council would need additional information to fully explore options for the November 2024 election. This would likely include additional polling once the revenue options are better understood. Currently underway, staff are working with HdL to refine options to increasing the Business License Tax. With City Council direction, staff could also explore other proposals for a general tax, such as increasing and extending the Utility Users’ Tax.

The City Council can also decide not to pursue any revenue measures and plan to cut $3 million annually from the General Fund budget.

With City Council direction, staff will proceed with refining options. Ultimately, the City will proceed with community education and stakeholder engagement only after direction is provided on what revenue measure or measures should be placed on future election cycles for voter consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no immediate impact associated with consideration of this item. Fiscal impact on the General Fund would be dependent on the direction received by the City Council and the outcome of any potential revenue measure.

Relative to a parcel tax measure, an $0.18 per building square foot levy would generate approximately $9.4 million, a $0.12 per building square foot levy would generate approximately $6.2 million, and a $0.06 per building square foot levy would generate approximately $3.0 million.

The City’s long-term financial forecast indicates a shortfall averaging $3.0 million from FY 2025 to FY 2035.

As previously stated, the General Fund is projected to fall below the minimum reserve fund balance goal of twenty percent of its annual operating expenditures by 2028 and would be depleted by 2035 if no corrective action is taken.

City Council/RSA Agenda 49 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive a report from TeamCivX and Godbe Research, providing an overview of community survey polling results and voter attitudes towards a parcel tax measure to restore and protect public safety services.

Furthermore, staff is requesting that the City Council provide policy direction on next steps as it relates to potential revenue measures in future election cycles.

Prepared by:

Jennifer Phan, Deputy City Manager
Submitted by:

Jennifer Phan, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Presentation - 2023 Revenue Measure Survey Results Attachment City Council/RSA Agenda 50 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 1 ends

November 14, 2023
City of Union City:
2023 Revenue Measure Survey
November 14, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 51 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 2 ends

November 14, 2023
Overview and Research Objectives
The City of Union City commissioned Godbe Research to conduct a survey of local voters with the following research objectives:
 Gauge satisfaction with the City’s provision of services and management of public funds, as well as opinion on the future economy;  Assess potential voter support for a parcel tax measure to restore and protect public safety services with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento;  Prioritize projects and programs to be funded with the proceeds;  Test the influence of informational and critical statements on potential voter support;
 Identify the rate and duration at which voters will support the measure; and  Identify any differences in voter support due to demographic and/or voter behavioral characteristics.

City Council/RSA Agenda 52 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 3 ends

November 14, 2023
Methodology Overview
 Data Collection Landline (28), cell (147), text to online (214), and email to online (59) interviewing
 Universe 32,160 likely November 2024 voters in the City of Union City (March 2024 subset)
 Fielding Dates September 6 through 18, 2023
 Interview Length 25 minutes
 Sample Size n=448
 Margin of Error + 4.60%
The data have been weighted to reflect the actual population characteristics of likely voters in the City of Union City in terms of their gender, age, and political party type.

City Council/RSA Agenda 53 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 4 ends

November 14, 2023
Key Findings
City Council/RSA Agenda 54 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 5 ends

November 14, 2023
Favorability Rating of City’s Provision of
Services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8/19 Survey
3/20 Voters
5/20 Survey
11/20 Voters
3/22 Survey
11/22 Voters
9/23 Survey
11/24 Voters

17.4%

25.5%

23.5%

21.0%

45.5%

39.5%

41.7%

44.4%

15.7%

12.5%

17.2%

13.2%

6.3%

7.1%

6.4%

6.2%

15.1%

15.3%

11.3%

15.1%
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable Very unfavorable DK/NA

65.4%

65.2%

65.0%

62.9%
City Council/RSA Agenda 55 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 6 ends

November 14, 2023
Favorability Rating of City’s Management
of Public Funds
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8/19 Survey
3/20 Voters
5/20 Survey
11/20 Voters
3/22 Survey
11/22 Voters
9/23 Survey
11/24 Voters

9.8%

12.6%

14.5%

11.8%

35.1%

32.2%

32.3%

37.6%

20.1%

17.4%

21.1%

18.5%

14.5%

13.7%

9.4%

10.7%

20.5%

24.1%

22.6%

21.4%
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable Very unfavorable DK/NA

49.4%

46.8%

44.8%

44.9%
City Council/RSA Agenda 56 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 7 ends

November 14, 2023
Initial Support for Parcel Tax Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
March
2024

21.8%

20.0%

30.3%

25.3%

17.1%

19.9%

14.8%

19.8%

16.1%

15.1%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

45.3%
To restore and protect public
safety services including:
• rapid 9-1-1 emergency
response;
• paramedics and fire protection;
• disaster preparedness;
• neighborhood police patrols
and community policing;
• youth violence and gang
prevention to maintain
children’s and school safety;
shall Union City’s public safety
measure be adopted levying 18
cents per building square foot for
residential parcels (other property
type rates described in voter
handbook) until ended by voters,
raising $9.4 million dollars
annually, with annual inflation
adjustments, independent
oversight, and all funds staying
local?

52.1%
City Council/RSA Agenda 57 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 8 ends

November 14, 2023
Features of the Measure
Likely November 2024 Voters
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2.

Somewhat
More Likely
Somewhat
Less Likely
Much Less
Likely
-2 -1 0 1 2
Keep community centers open
Provide mental health programs and support to help…
Maintain neighborhood police patrols
Provide programs to help keep kids off the streets
Maintain fire protection services
Increase the number of on-duty firefighters and…
Protect paramedic services
Increase the number of on-duty police officers,…
Provide a medical response unit to reduce response…
Maintain youth violence, drug and gang prevention and…
Restore the City's programs to reduce blight and keep…
Maintain rapid 911 emergency response
Reduce crime and gun violence

0.95 0.97

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.03

1.05 1.06

1.07 1.07

1.07 1.11

1.15 Much More
Likely
Tier 1

74.6%

71.9%
City Council/RSA Agenda 58 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 9 ends

November 14, 2023
Informational Statements
Likely November 2024 Voters
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, and “No Effect” = 0. 0 1 2
The measure requires an independent citizens' oversight committee, financial audits, and yearly reports to the… Crime is on the rise throughout the Bay Area and is
impacting our safety and quality of life. This measure… Union City received dedicated funding for public safety for nearly twenty years and had a documented track record…
At certain times, Union City only has four on-duty police officers to serve our city of nearly 70,000 residents. This… The measure will continue to give Union City local control over local funds for local needs. No funds can be taken… In the event of a heart attack, stroke, medical emergency or accident, seconds can be the difference between life… This measure requires public disclosure of the spending of every penny from this measure
Large businesses will pay their fair share, so homeowners don't shoulder the entire cost of keeping Union City safe

1.28 1.28

1.28 1.31

1.32 1.33

1.37 1.45
No Effect Somewhat
More Likely
Much More
Likely
Tier 1

78.8%

70.1%
City Council/RSA Agenda 59 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 10 ends

November 14, 2023
Interim Support for Parcel Tax Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
Initial Test
November
2024
Interim
Test
March
2024
Initial Test
March
2024
Interim
Test

21.8%

29.6%

20.0%

27.9%

30.3%

31.0%

25.3%

29.6%

17.1%

15.4%

19.9%

17.3%

14.8%

14.0%

19.8%

14.8%

16.1%

10.0%

15.1%

10.4%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

52.1%

57.5%

60.6%
City Council/RSA Agenda 60 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 11 ends

November 14, 2023
Critical Statements
Likely November 2024 Voters
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, and “No Effect” = 0. 0 1 2
D. Firefighters and police officers are already overpaid and receive lavish benefits. Why should we pay more to… B. The measure will cost the average homeowner more
than $300 a year
G. A property tax measure for the same purpose was
defeated in 2020. The City needs to get its financial…
A. Given the rising inflation rate and the increasing cost of basics like groceries, medications and gas, we can't…
C. The City imposed a utility tax in 2020 and a sales tax in 2022. Now they want a property tax on top of that. The… E. Union City's taxes are at a higher rate than all our neighboring cities
H. The measure is a forever tax that will never end
F. The tax will automatically increase every year without voter approval
I. This measure will be in addition to the hundreds of
dollars in special taxes that homeowners are already…

0.86 0.96

0.98 0.99

1.07 1.11

1.13 1.24

1.29 No Effect Somewhat
More Likely
Much More
Likely
Tier 1

80.4%

49.3%
Tier 2

61.3%

60.9%
Within Precinct 822000 (CFD 2005-1)

53.0%
T-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 61 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 12 ends

November 14, 2023
Informed Support for Parcel Tax Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
Initial Test
November
2024
Final Test
March
2024
Initial Test
March
2024
Final Test

21.8%

20.6%

20.0%

18.3%

30.3%

31.0%

25.3%

25.9%

17.1%

15.4%

19.9%

16.9%

14.8%

17.4%

19.8%

21.1%

16.1%

15.6%

15.1%

17.8%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

52.1%

44.2%

51.6%
City Council/RSA Agenda 62 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 13 ends

November 14, 2023
Confirmation of Support for $324 Typical Cost
Alternative Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
March
2024

16.2%

12.9%

28.2%

28.9%

23.9%

24.0%

22.5%

25.8%

9.3%

8.5%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

41.8%
If you knew this measure would
cost the typical homeowner about
$324 per year, would you definitely
vote yes, probably vote yes,
probably vote no, or definitely
vote no on this measure?

44.4%
City Council/RSA Agenda 63 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 14 ends

November 14, 2023
Support for 12 Cents per Building Square Foot
Alternative Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
March
2024

27.5%

25.9%

26.9%

25.5%

16.7%

17.8%

17.2%

18.7%

11.7%

12.0%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

51.4%
INSTEAD of levying an 18 cent per
building square foot tax, what if
the measure to restore and protect
public safety services including:
rapid 9-1-1 emergency response;
paramedics and fire protection;
disaster preparedness;
neighborhood police patrols and
community policing; youth
violence and gang prevention to
maintain children’s and school
safety levied 12 cents per building
square foot? 54.4%
City Council/RSA Agenda 64 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 15 ends

November 14, 2023
Confirmation of Support for $216 Typical Cost
Alternative Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
March
2024

28.4%

27.9%

25.6%

23.7%

17.8%

17.7%

18.3%

21.2%

10.0%

9.5%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

51.6%
If you knew this measure would
cost the typical homeowner about
$216 per year, would you definitely
vote yes, probably vote yes,
probably vote no, or definitely
vote no on this measure?

54.0%
City Council/RSA Agenda 65 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 16 ends

November 14, 2023
Support for 6 Cents per Building Square Foot
Alternative Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
March
2024

35.3%

35.9%

23.7%

19.2%

14.5%

15.7%

16.4%

19.4%

10.0%

9.9%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

55.1%
INSTEAD of levying a 12 cent per
building square foot tax, what if
the measure to restore and protect
public safety services including:
rapid 9-1-1 emergency response;
paramedics and fire protection;
disaster preparedness;
neighborhood police patrols and
community policing; youth
violence and gang prevention to
maintain children’s and school
safety levied 6 cents per building
square foot? 59.0%
City Council/RSA Agenda 66 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 17 ends

November 14, 2023
Confirmation of Support for $108 Typical Cost
Alternative Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
March
2024

41.7%

39.1%

22.0%

21.0%

13.0%

14.3%

15.4%

19.1%

7.8%

6.5%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

60.1%
If you knew this measure would
cost the typical homeowner about
$108 per year, would you definitely
vote yes, probably vote yes,
probably vote no, or definitely
vote no on this measure?

63.7%
City Council/RSA Agenda 67 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 18 ends

November 14, 2023
Support for 12 Year Duration Alternative
Measure
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
November
2024
March
2024

32.1%

28.6%

24.3%

25.0%

17.1%

17.0%

15.5%

18.3%

10.9%

11.1%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA

53.6%
INSTEAD of levying a measure to
restore and protect public safety
services including: rapid 9-1-1
emergency response; paramedics
and fire protection; disaster
preparedness; neighborhood
police patrols and community
policing; youth violence and gang
prevention to maintain children’s
and school safety, until ended by
voters, an alternative would be for
the measure to last for 12 years?

56.4%
City Council/RSA Agenda 68 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 19 ends

November 14, 2023
Outlook on Future Economy
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
5/20 Survey
11/20 Voters
3/22 Survey
11/22 Voters
9/23 Survey
11/24 Voters

33.8%

25.0%

22.8%

20.1%

29.3%

36.7%

34.9%

36.2%

24.7%

11.3%

9.5%

15.7%
Better About the same Worse DK/NA
City Council/RSA Agenda 69 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Page 20 ends

November 14, 2023
www.godberesearch.com
California and Corporate Offices
1220 Howard Avenue, Suite 250
Burlingame, CA 94010
Nevada Office
59 Damonte Ranch Parkway, Suite B309
Reno, NV 89521
City Council/RSA Agenda 70 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 11/14/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARILOU AYUPAN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RECEIVE REPORT ON THE STATUS OF THE BART PEDESTRIAN ATGRADE CROSSING PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 14-14, ON THE

OAKLAND SUBDIVISION TRACKS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE

UNION CITY BART STATION AND OTHER REQUIRED RAILROAD

SAFETY IMPROVMENTS, INCLUDING DECOTO ROAD AT-GRADE
CROSSING AND THE CLOSURE OF “I” STREET AT-GRADE RAILROAD

CROSSING
This report is a project status update of the BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing Project, City Project No. 14-14 on the Oakland Subdivision tracks located adjacent to the Union City BART Station. The report will also cover other required railroad safety improvements including the Decoto Road At-Grade Crossing and the closure of “I” Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing. The associated railroad safety improvements are the requirement by California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) and Union Pacific Railroad (UP) for a new, yet rare pedestrian at-grade crossing on a UP operating trackway.

The Union City Engineering Division presented the project status to the Development Review Committee (DRC) on October 16, 2023, which was attended by Building, Fire, Police, and Economic & Community Development (ECD) staff. On October 18, 2023, the project was presented to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) for public review and input.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is in alignment with the following:

Goal C, Strategy 2: Economic, Community Development and Public Safety – Facilitate the build out of the greater Station District Area through the construction of the Quarry Lakes Parkway, upgrades to the BART Station and completion of the Pedestrian Rail Crossing and the sale and development to of City-owned land.

City Council/RSA Agenda 71 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

BACKGROUND
In 2001, Union City prepared the Union City Intermodal Station and Transit Facility Plan (Intermodal Station Plan) in partnership with Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), AC Transit, Santa Clara County Valley Transit Authority (VTA), Union City Transit, Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA), Altamont Commuter Express (ACE), Caltrain, Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority (ACTIA), San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA), and local residents and business representatives. The Intermodal Station Plan was adopted and incorporated into the Union City General Plan. The Intermodal Station Plan identified transit-oriented development (TOD) opportunities surrounding the Intermodal Station and an opportunity to modernize the existing 1970s Union City BART Station (“BART Station”) with the vision of making the BART Station a two-sided station with direct pedestrian access to an underutilized 100- acre site to the east of the BART Station, the former PG&E Pipe Storage Yard and the defunct Pacific State Steel Corporation (PSSC) site. While plan has evolved over the past 23 years, the vision and framework of the plan has been consistent. See Attachment 1 for the Union City BART Intermodaland Station District Plan.

In 2002, BART prepared and adopted the Union City BART Station Comprehensive Station Plan (BART CSP) that included a direct BART-railconnection, creating a Southern Alameda County regional passenger rail hub surrounded by TOD. The BART CSP incorporated the vision of the Intermodal Station Plan to create a free “pedestrian pass-through” that did not require entering a paid area to enable transit riders and Station District residents easy access to buses, BART trains, the future passenger rail station, Station District housing, and commercialareas.

The Union City Intermodal Station, Phase 1, included reconfiguring the 14-acre Union City BART Station site to: 1) create a new, 16-bay bus facility at the front entrance of the station serving AC Transit, Dumbarton Express, and UC Transit; 2) provide multiple points of access for pedestrians, bicycles, and buses to the BART Station with a new roadway to Decoto Road named Station Way; 3) reconfigure the BART parking lot to allow future conversion to transit-oriented housing and a jobs center with commercial uses; and, 4) improve passenger circulation on the BART southbound platform through the relocation of elevators, widening passenger platforms, installing additional escalators and stairs, and creating a new transit drivers’ facility (break area and restrooms) within the BART Station.

The Union City Intermodal Station, Phase 2, and Phase 2A, included BART Station building improvements on the northbound side of the station including relocating elevators, installing additional stairs and escalators, widening, and lengthening the station passenger platform, and re-organizing the fare-gates to accommodate a free “pedestrian pass-through” inside the station and allow for the new east entrance into the BART station.

Union City’s Redevelopment Agency investments, along with federal, state, and local funds facilitated the Union City Intermodal Station improvements. The Redevelopment Agency also led the planning and design effort with BART oversight and approvals. Project funding for the Intermodal Station, Phase 1 and Phase 2 was approximately $100 million.

In 2013, Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) Project Funding Agreement (PFA) No.

A13-0058 awarded a transportation funding grant in the amount of $ 22,644,974 including the City’s local match (25.30%) of $5,730,000 to complete Union City Intermodal Station, Phase 2 and for the Pedestrian Crossing Improvements. Shortly after, Union City began the design of a pedestrian at-grade crossing over the UP railroad tracks (Oakland Subdivision) to complete the free “pedestrian pass-through” and the east entrance into the BART Station. See Attachment 2, for the BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing Layout.

With the goal of creating a two-sided BART station, the City engaged TJKM to prepare an analysis of how to comply with the anticipated UP requirement to close an existing at-grade railroad crossing along the Oakland Subdivision. Through a traffic analysis, it was determined that the existing “I” Street at-grade railroad crossing was the preferred crossing to close because the street had the least amount of pedestrian and vehicle traffic. See Attachment 3, TJKM Traffic Impact Analysis for At-Grade Crossing Closure Study.

City Council/RSA Agenda 72 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
In April 2015, Union City submitted a formal proposal to UP for the new BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing on the Oakland Subdivision track adjacent to the Union City BART Station. This formal proposal began the evaluation process for the at-grade crossing on an active railroad track. A new public pedestrian atgrade crossing was contingent on the following railroad safety measures and improvements:

Closure of an existing public at-grade crossing, which was identified at the “I” Street (Oakland Subdivision) at-grade railroad crossing.

Revisions to the sidewalk crossing on the Decoto Road (Oakland Subdivision) at-grade railroad crossing.

Improvements to the Niles Subdivision at the Decoto Road at-grade railroad crossing and the Whipple Road at-grade railroad crossing.

Improvements to the Coast Subdivision at Smith Street at-grade railroad crossing, west of Dyer Street.

For reference, see Attachment 4 for Union City Railroad At-Grade Crossing Map for locations of these improvements.

In early 2016, Union City resubmitted the formal proposal to UP that included the required safety measures and improvements for a new public pedestrian at-grade crossing. Later that year, UP conceptually approved the new Public At-Grade Crossing at MP 27.10 on the Oakland Subdivision and recommended the City proceed with submitting the new public at-grade crossing application (No, 17-02-010) to California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) for their review and approval, see Attachment 5. Also, UP provided an estimate to the City in the amount $ 457,666 for their cost for preparation of agreement, design review and approval process for this new public pedestrian at-grade crossing. On July 27, 2017 under Resolution No. 5092-17, the City Council of Union City approved Union Pacific Railroad funds for the BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing, City Project No. 14-

14. On December 4, 2017, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued the Decision authorizing the City of Union to construct, an At-Grade Pedestrian Rail Crossing across the Union Pacific, Oakland Subdivision, Mile Post 27.10 in the City of Union City, Alameda County approving the new BART pedestrian at-grade crossing, the closure of an existing public at-grade crossing at “I” Street and the required railroad safety measures and improvements, see Attachment 6. The new pedestrian at-grade crossing will complete the free “pedestrian pass-through” between the east and west sides of the BART station and enable residents and transit patrons to access a future passenger rail station from the BART Station.

On July 9, 2019 under Resolution No. 5503-19, the City Council of Union City approved the City Manager to execute the Public At-Grade Pedestrian Crossing Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad. See Attachment 7 and 8 for the UP Agreement and City Council Presentation.

Over the past four (4) years, the City and consultant team that includes HDR, ROMA Collaborative and RSE (Rail Survey and Engineers) have been preparing project plans for UP, CPUC and BART approvals.

Unfortunately, due to the September 2019 cyberattack, 2020-2021 COVID-19 pandemic and project manager changes at UP, the project sat idle and experienced delays. In early 2022, the project restarted with a new assigned UP Project Manager and UP agreed to monthly project check-in meetings that began July 2022.

DISCUSSION
With the regular monthly meetings, the City and its consultant team, in partnership with UP, have continued to make progress on the project. The consultant team also added a new team member, Attorney Kirk E. Trost, who has expertise in UP and CPUC negotiations. With Mr. Trost’s facilitation, the CPUC and UP have City Council/RSA Agenda 73 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
conditionally agreed to extend the terms of the existing 2017 CPUC agreement, the 2019 UP agreement, and to allow the phasing of the BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing, City Project No. 14-14.

Phase 1 of the project will include:

Construction of a new, public pedestrian at-grade crossing that will connect to the east entrance of the Union City BART Station,
Closure of an existing public at-grade crossing, which was identified as the “I” Street (Oakland Subdivision) at-grade railroad crossing, and
Revisions to the sidewalk crossing on the Decoto Road (Oakland Subdivision) at-grade railroad crossing.

Under the terms of the UP agreement for the construction of the new at-grade crossing, the City will pay UP to design and construct railroad warning gates, safety equipment, and communications facilities. The City will design and construct the non-rail elements that include a concrete walkway, stairs, hand railing, drainage, and architectural elements such as granite cladding and lights. The construction plans for the City’s portion of the work are nearing completion and it is expected that the bid package for the BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing Project, City Project No. 14-14 will be ready for advertisement in the late summer of 2024.

The UP agreement also requires the City Council to adopt a separate resolution to close and vacate the “I” Street railroad at-grade crossing before the new BART at-grade crossing could be opened for public use.

Constructing the new at-grade crossing project would take approximately one year to be completed. Prior to going to bid, a public hearing about the need to close the existing “I” Street at-grade railroad crossing will be required at a City Council meeting.

The estimated project cost is approximately $7.2 million, which includes estimated UP construction costs. The project is currently funded with the remaining Alameda CTC PFA funds, Measure BB, and the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA) funds. To offset the City’s RDA contribution, the City plans to seek funding opportunities through BART’s Safe Routes to BART Program and Metropolitan Transportation Agency’s Regional Measure 3 Project for Dumbarton Corridor Program.

Once the project plans are approved, UP will update the UP Public At-Grade Pedestrian Crossing Agreement with their final construction cost. The City will be responsible for all costs for said pedestrian crossing, including an annual signal maintenance fee, which will be subject to cost escalation.

At the October 18, 2023, BPAC meeting, the BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing was presented, see Attachment 9. Comments from the public included:

Provide a continuous sidewalk across “I” Street where the road will be closed to allow pedestrians to cross.

Improve the continuous bike and pedestrian path on 12
th Street from Decoto Road/Kennedy Park to
“I” Street.

Enhance the bike lanes on Decoto Road and make the right-turn curb return (geometry) from westbound Decoto Road to 12
th Street tighter to slow vehicle traffic across the new crosswalk.

Staff is working with the consultant team to review these comments and to ensure that any such improvements meet the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual (HDM), Caltrans Standard Details, and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) requirements.

At the upcoming Station District Community Open House on Saturday, December 2, 2023, at Studio 11, drawings of the BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing Project will be posted. Staff will be on hand to explain City Council/RSA Agenda 74 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
the project and respond to questions.

FISCAL IMPACT
Receiving this report will have no impact on the General Fund.

Future construction of the BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing Project, City Project No. 14-14, is expected to be paid for through the remaining Redevelopment Agency bond funds. Staff will also pursue grant funding sources to offset the cost of the improvements.

RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational item and no actions action is required by the City Council at this time, though staff welcomes comments and questions.

Prepared by:

Farooq Azim, City Engineer
Submitted by:

Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Attachment 1 - UCBART Intermodaland Station District Plan Attachment Attachment 2 - BART PEDAt-Grade Crossing Plan Attachment Attachment 3 - Traffic Impact Analysis forAt-Grade Crossing Closure Study
Attachment
Attachment 4 - UPAt-Grade Crossing Locations for Safety Improvements
Attachment
Attachment 5 - 2016 UPApplication for NEW BART Ped At-Grade Crossing
Attachment
Attachment 6 - 2017 Final CPUCDecision -Approval Attachment Attachment 7 - 2019 UP PublicAt-Grade Ped Xing Agreement Attachment Attachment 8 - 2019 Council Presentation - UP Ped At-Grade Xing Attachment Attachment 9 - October 18th BPACBART Ped Xing Attachment City Council/RSA Agenda 75 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
1 Attachment 1: Union City Intermodal and Station District Plan City Council/RSA Agenda 76 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Attachment 2
- BART PEDESTRIAN AT-GRADE CROSSING PLAN
1 City Council/RSA Agenda 77 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report
Traffic Impact Analysis
of the At-Grade
Railroad Crossing
Closure Study
In the City of Union City
June 29, 2011
Pleasanton
Fresno
Sacramento
Santa Rosa
TJKM
www.tjkm.com
City Council/RSA Agenda 78 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
www.tjkm.com
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
J:\JURISDICTION\U\Union City\017-061 RR Xing Closure Study\Report\R06292011-Final.docx Prepared by:

TJKM Transportation Consultants
3875 Hopyard Road
Suite 200
Pleasanton, CA 94588-8526
Tel: 925.463.0611
Fax: 925.463.3690
TJKM
Final Report
Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study
In the City of Union City
June 29, 2011
City Council/RSA Agenda 79 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Table of Contents
Introduction and Summary ................................................................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing plus ‘F’ Street Closure Conditions............................................................................................. 1 Existing plus ‘H’ Street Closure Conditions ........................................................................................... 1 Existing plus ‘I’ Street Closure Conditions.............................................................................................. 2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................ 4 Existing Conditions and Study Methodology ..................................................................... 5 Roadway Network ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Level of Service Analysis Methodology ......................................................................................................... 5 Criteria of Significance ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Traffic Volumes, Intersection Geometrics, and Traffic Controls ........................................................... 6 At-grade Crossing Pedestrian Volumes ...................................................................................................... 10 Study Intersections, and Scenarios............................................................................................................... 10 Collision History .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Results of Level of Service Analysis ............................................................................................................. 12 Impacts of ‘F’ Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure ............................................ 13 ‘F’ Street Closure Description and Traffic Redistribution ..................................................................... 13 Existing plus ‘F’ Street Closure Conditions ............................................................................................... 13 Emergency Vehicle Access Evaluation ......................................................................................................... 13 Impacts of ‘H’ Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure ........................................... 15 ‘H’ Street Closure Description and Traffic Redistribution .................................................................... 15 Existing plus ‘H’ Street Closure Conditions .............................................................................................. 15 Emergency Vehicle Access Evaluation ......................................................................................................... 15 Impacts of ‘I’ Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure ............................................. 17 ‘I’ Street Closure Description and Traffic Redistribution ...................................................................... 17 Existing plus ‘I’ Street Closure Conditions ................................................................................................ 17 Emergency Vehicle Access Evaluation ......................................................................................................... 17 Ranking and Evaluation Criteria for At-grade Crossing Closure ................................... 19 Priority Ranking Criteria ................................................................................................................................ 19 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................. 20 Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Existing plus ‘F’ Street Closure Conditions........................................................................................... 20 Existing plus ‘H’ Street Closure Conditions ......................................................................................... 20 Existing plus ‘I’ Street Closure Conditions............................................................................................ 20 Study Participants ............................................................................................................... 21 TJKM Personnel ................................................................................................................................................ 21 Persons Consulted ........................................................................................................................................... 21 References ......................................................................................................................................................... 21 City Council/RSA Agenda 80 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
List of Appendices
Appendix A – Level of Service Methodology
Appendix B – Existing Counts
Appendix C – SWITRS and FRA Collision Data
Appendix D – Level of Service Worksheets: Existing
Appendix E – LOS Worksheets: Existing + ‘F’ Street Closure Appendix F – LOS Worksheets: Existing + ‘H’ Street Closure Appendix G – LOS Worksheets: Existing + ‘I’ Street Closure List of Figures
Figure 1: Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Existing Weekday At-grade Crossing Traffic Volumes: F, H and I Streets .............................. 6 Figure 3: Existing Turning Movement and Average Daily Traffic Volumes................................................ 7 Figure 4: Existing Pedestrian Counts .................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 5: Existing Bicycle Counts ......................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 6: Existing Weekday At-grade Pedestrian Crossing Volumes: F, H and I Streets ..................... 10 Figure 7: ‘F’ Street Closed – Turning Movement Volumes and Lane Geometry ................................... 14 Figure 8: ‘H’ Street Closed – Turning Movement Volumes and Lane Geometry.................................. 16 Figure 9: ‘I’ Street Closed – Turning Movement Volumes and Lane Geometry .................................... 18 List of Tables
Table I: City of Union City Oakland Subdivision Line Railroad Crossing Inventory ............................... 4 Table II: Existing Intersection Level of Service Results ................................................................................ 12 Table III: ‘F’ Street Closure Intersection Level of Service Results............................................................. 13 Table IV: ‘H’ Street Closure Intersection Level of Service Results ........................................................... 15 Table V: ‘I’ Street Closure Intersection Level of Service Results .............................................................. 17 Table VI: At-grade Crossing Closure Priority Ranking Criteria................................................................. 19 City Council/RSA Agenda 81 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 1 ends

June 29, 2011
Introduction and Summary
Introduction
This report presents the results of TJKM's traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the closure of an existing at-grade crossing of one of the three Union City Streets across the railroad tracks owned by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Company on the Oakland Subdivision Line. The City is proposing to construct a pedestrian crossing to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station to provide direct access from the existing BART parking lot located on the east side of the UPRR tracks. However, before the proposed pedestrian crossing can be built the UPPR requires the closure of an existing at-grade railroad crossing along the Oakland Subdivision Line. Figure 1 illustrates the vicinity map with the location of the ‘F’ Street, ‘H’ Street, and ‘I’ Street at-grade railroad crossings relative to the surrounding roadway network.

The purpose of this TIA is to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the potential closure of an at-grade railroad crossing along the UPRR Oakland Subdivision Line and to identify any critical traffic issues that need to be addressed in the on-going planning process. The study primarily focused on 1) evaluating traffic conditions at six study intersections, and 2) how these intersections may be potentially impacted by the closure of an at-grade railroad crossing.

Summary
The potential impacts of a possible closure of one of the three existing at-grade railroad crossings were evaluated in accordance with the standards set forth by the level of service policies of the City of Union City and generally accepted traffic engineering principles and practices.

Existing Conditions
• Currently, all study intersections operate at LOS C or better during each of the study peak hours.
• Based on the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and the Federal Railroad Administration Web Accident Prediction System no reported accidents on the Oakland Subdivision Line have occurred in the past five years within the City of Union City. • At present, the ‘F’ Street at grade crossing has the highest number of pedestrians crossing the railroad tracks. The ‘H’ Street crossing has the highest traffic volume, while the ‘I’ Street crossing has the lowest traffic volume.

Existing plus ‘F’ Street Closure Conditions
• Under this scenario, the intersections of ‘H’ Street/11th Street and ‘H’ Street/12th Street are expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour. • The closure of ‘F’ Street at-grade crossing would cause the most impact to emergency vehicles and the second highest increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Existing plus ‘H’ Street Closure Conditions
• Under this scenario, the intersection of ‘F’ Street/11th Street is expected to operate at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour.
• Of the three at-grade crossing closures being considered, the closure of ‘H’ Street would cause the second most impact to emergency vehicles and the highest increase in VMT.

City Council/RSA Agenda 82 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 2 ends

June 29, 2011
Existing plus ‘I’ Street Closure Conditions
• Similar to the existing conditions, under this scenario all study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better during each of the peak periods. • Of the three at-grade crossing closures being considered, the closure of ‘I’ Street would cause the least impact to emergency vehicles and the least increase in VMT. • ‘I’ Street ranks the highest for consideration of the at-grade crossing closure. However, the ‘I’ Street at-grade crossing serves 37 percent of the pedestrian traffic. As a result, it is recommended that the existing ‘I’ Street at-grade crossing be considered for closure, but allow pedestrians to cross the railroad tracks at this location.

City Council/RSA Agenda 83 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
017-061 - 5/24/11 - JB
Figure
1 Not to Scale
NORTH
City of Union City - Railroad Crossing Closure Study
Vicinity Map
UNION
CITY
BART

STATION
H ST.

G ST.

I ST.

H ST.

F ST.

E ST.

D ST.

RAILROAD AVE.

BART
WHIPPLE RD.

MISSION BLVD.

DECOTO RD.

ALVARADO-NILES RD.
11th ST.
10th ST.
1 2
3 4
5 6
J ST.

LEGEND
Study Intersection
12th ST.
13th ST.
14th ST.

City Council/RSA Agenda 84 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 4 ends

Purpose and Need
The City of Union City is proposing to construct a pedestrian crossing at the BART Station/Railroad to provide direct access from the existing BART parking lot located on the east side of the UPRR tracks. As per the conditions of approval from the UPRR Company, construction of a new at-grade crossing will require the closure of an existing
at-grade railroad crossing along the Oakland
Subdivision Line. The Guidelines for the
Federal Aid At-Grade Highway Rail Crossing
Program (Section 130 program) defines AtGrade crossing closure is a condition that occurs when vehicular traffic is removed from
conflict with railroad traffic at grade by closing
the road. This includes removal of warning
devices, removal of the surfacing and
approaches, construction of barriers and/or
fencing, signage, and other measures as
deemed necessary during the diagnostic
review. The City of Union City engaged the
services of TJKM Transportation Consultants to conduct a study of three existing at-grade railroad crossings to be considered for closure to satisfy the conditions of approval of the UPRR Company.

TJKM Transportation Consultants performed a thorough review of the three existing railroad crossings and observed traffic circulation in the vicinity of the railroad crossings. TJKM analyzed the effects of the possible closure of the three separate at-grade railroad crossings and provided evaluation criteria along with recommendations for closing an at-grade crossing to traffic without causing significant negative impacts on traffic in the area.

TJKM staff reviewed the grade crossing inventory database for the Oakland Subdivision Line within the City of Union City and Table I summarizes the existing at-grade crossings in the vicinity of the study area. There are three at-grade crossings along the Oakland Subdivision Line in the vicinity of the proposed BART crossing. During the data collection periods (between 7:00 - 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 - 6:00 p.m.) for the study intersections, only one train was observed traveling in the southbound direction. This train started crossing the ‘F’ Street at-grade crossing at 4:24 p.m. and completed crossing the ‘I’ Street at-grade crossing at 4:27 p.m.

Table I: City of Union City Oakland Subdivision Line Railroad Crossing Inventory Crossing # Line Name Street Train Speed
834189R Oakland Subdivision Line ‘F’ Street 40 to 50 mph 834188J Oakland Subdivision Line ‘H’ Street 40 to 50 mph 834187C Oakland Subdivision Line ‘I’ Street 40 to 50 mph June 29, 2011
City Council/RSA Agenda 85 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 5 ends

June 29, 2011
Existing Conditions and Study Methodology
Roadway Network
The project site and surrounding study area are illustrated in Figure 1. Important roadways within the project area are discussed below:
‘H’ Street is classified as a primary collector street. ‘H’ Street is predominantly an east-west collector street that extends southwesterly for 1.1 miles from its intersection with Fourth Street (near Decoto Road) and terminates at Alvarado-Niles Road. Royal Ann Drive is the southwestern extension of ‘H’ Street, south of Alvarado-Niles Road. ‘H’ Street provides direct connection to James Logan High School, New Haven Adult School, and Decoto Elementary School. Primary collector streets are intended to transfer traffic from collector and minor residential streets to an arterial. Average daily traffic volume on a primary collector will usually average less than 10,000 vehicles per day. TJKM staff observed heavy vehicular and pedestrian volumes on ‘H’ Street during the school drop-off and pick-up periods for James Logan High School. At present ‘H’ Street has an ADT of 4,445 trips across the at-grade railroad crossing. ‘F’ Street is classified as a residential street. In the study area, ‘F’ Street is predominantly an eastwest local residential street that extends between Railroad Avenue and 15th Street approximately one-quarter of a mile to the southwest. Sherman Drive is the southwesterly extension of ‘F’ Street south of 15th Avenue and provides connection to Alvarado-Niles Road. ‘F’ Street provides direct connection to Searles Elementary School. At present, ‘F’ Street has an ADT of 2,420 trips across the at-grade railroad crossing.
‘I’ Street is classified as a residential street. In the study area, ‘I’ Street is predominantly an eastwest residential street that extends between Railroad Avenue and 14th Street approximately one third of a mile to the southwest. TJKM staff observed that ‘I’ Street served as the main pedestrian access for James Logan High School for a few students. At present, ‘I’ Street has an ADT of 532 trips across the at-grade railroad crossing.

TJKM conducted preliminary field visits to the study area to determine existing vehicle and pedestrian activities on the three at-grade crossings. ‘I’ Street served as the pedestrian access for James Logan High School for few students. ‘F’ Street served as the primary access for the Searles Elementary School.

Level of Service Analysis Methodology
Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative index of the performance of an element of the transportation system. LOS is a rating scale running from A to F, with A indicating no congestion of any kind, and F indicating unacceptable congestion and delays. LOS in this study describes the operating conditions for signalized and unsignalized intersections.

The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual is the standard reference published by the Transportation Research Board, and contains the specific criteria and methods to be used in assessing LOS.

Synchro software was used to define LOS in this study. Details regarding these calculations are in Appendix A.

Criteria of Significance
The City’s service level standard is LOS D for both signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Intersections that exceed (i.e. LOS E or LOS F) this service level threshold are considered impacted and should be considered for mitigation. The number of vehicles on the critical approach and vehicles contributed by a proposed project are taken into consideration. Exceptions to the LOS D standard arise when the project is not expected to add any trips to the critical movements at an intersection that is operating at LOS D or worse under existing conditions.

City Council/RSA Agenda 86 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 6 ends

Traffic Volumes, Intersection Geometrics, and Traffic Controls The existing turning movement counts for the study intersections were collected on a typical weekday when the James Logan High School and Searles Elementary School were in session for the a.m. peak period (7:00 – 9:00 a.m.), the afternoon school peak period (2:00 – 4:00 p.m.), and the p.m. peak period (4:00 – 6:00 p.m.). TJKM also obtained ADT counts for ‘F’ Street, ‘H’ Street and ‘I’ Street near the at-grade railroad crossings. Additionally, the number of trains at each of the at-grade crossing during the peak periods was counted. The peak hour intersection turning movement and daily directional volume counts were collected in March 2011. Figure 2 illustrates the weekday hourly fluctuations in traffic volumes at the existing at-grade crossings. ‘I’ Street has very low but constant traffic volumes throughout the day, whereas both ‘F’ Street and ‘H’ Street have significant traffic volume fluctuations with high volumes between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., and between 2:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. The existing turning movement volumes, 24-hour volume counts, lane geometry and intersection controls are illustrated in Figure 3. Figure 4 and Figure 5 illustrates the existing pedestrian and bicyclist counts at the study intersections, respectively. The raw count data are included in Appendix B.

Figure 2: Existing Weekday At-grade Crossing Traffic Volumes: F, H and I Streets

June 29, 2011
City Council/RSA Agenda 87 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
21 (17) [7]
164 (101) [71]
6 (4) [3]
21 (6) [10]
22 (18) [30]
7 (10) [10]
2 (1) [2]
174 (80) [43]
1 (5) [3]
45 (26) [12]27 (12) [33]2 (2) [0]
12 (8) [6]
235 (223) [175]
43 (20) [19]
27 (24) [17]26 (29) [44]28 (25) [39]
4 (5) [4]
377 (190) [136]
22 (13) [10]
15 (7) [6]25 (12) [21]1 (0) [0]
0 (0) [2]
3 (5) [10]
5 (13) [6]
11 (18) [22]
75 (80) [95]
9 (5) [17]
6 (1) [2]
6 (6) [11]
13 (6) [6]
1 (0) [4]83 (47) [46]2 (2) [5]
1 (2) [4]
7 (11) [13]
0 (0) [1]
1 (0) [0]0 (0) [1]0 (0) [0]
6 (5) [5]
9 (17) [27]
0 (0) [1]
0 (6) [5]0 (0) [0]3 (6) [3]
3 (6) [3]
284 (226) [189]
5 (5) [0]
4 (3) [1]1 (7) [1]1 (2) [5]
7 (3) [6]
427 (195) [149]
2 (3) [1]
2 (4) [2]3 (1) [6]12 (16) [4]
158 (91) [71]
2 (0) [2]
3 (5) [0]
40 (30) [14]
235 (107) [59]
9 (8) [6]
Intersection #1
F St./11th Street
Intersection #5
I St./11th St.

Intersection #6
I St./12th St.

Intersection #2
F St./12th St.

Intersection #3
H St./11th St.

Intersection #4
H St./12th St.

Small Pedestrian
Path/Driveway
017-061 - 5/24/11 - JB
Figure
3 Not to Scale
NORTH
City of Union City - Railroad Crossing Closure Study
Existing Turning Movement Volumes and Average Daily Traffic Volumes UNION
CITY
BART

STATION
H ST.

G ST.

I ST.

H ST.

F ST.

E ST.

D ST.

RAILROAD AVE.

BART
WHIPPLE RD.

MISSION BLVD.

DECOTO RD.

ALVARADO-NILES RD.
11th ST.
10th ST.
1 2
3 4
5 6
J ST.
12th ST.
13th ST.
14th ST.

LEGEND
Study Intersection
Stop Sign
AM Peak Hour Volumes
School Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Roadway ADT Count Location
XX
(XX)
[XX]
XX
City Council/RSA Agenda 88 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
017-061 - 5/24/11 - JB
Figure
4 Intersection #1
F St./11th St.

Intersection #2
F St./12th St.

Intersection #3
H St./11th St.

Intersection #4
H St./12th St.

Intersection #5
I St./11th St.

Intersection #6
I St./12th St.
0 (7) [4]
6 (3) [4]
1 (0) [0]
0 (3) [2]
7 (4) [7]
2 (30) [10]
4 (10) [6]
2 (17) [5]
2 (6) [1]
45 (92) [19]
1 (3) [7]
25 (27) [9]
3 (12) [3]
0 (2) [17]
64 (11) [1]
1 (0) [11]
11 (128) [6]
32 (4) [14] 18 (10) [3] 0 (3) [2]
City of Union City - Railroad Crossing Closure Study
Existing Pedestrian Counts
7 (13) [13]
0 (4) [2]
3 (12) [3]
3 (6) [3]
Not to Scale
NORTH
LEGEND
Study Intersection
AM Peak Hour Volumes
School Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
[XX]
UNION
CITY
BART

STATION
H ST.

G ST.

I ST.

H ST.

F ST.

E ST.

D ST.

RAILROAD AVE.

BART
WHIPPLE RD.

MISSION BLVD.

DECOTO RD.

ALVARADO-NILES RD.
11th ST.
10th ST.
1 2
3 4
5 6
J ST.
12th ST.
13th ST.
14th ST.

City Council/RSA Agenda 89 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
0 (0) [1]
0 (0) [2]
0 (0) [1]
0 (0) [0]2 (0) [1]0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [2]
2 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]
2 (2) [0]1 (0) [3]0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]
4 (3) [4]
0 (0) [2]
0 (0) [0]3 (1) [1]0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]
1 (4) [3]
1 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]1 (0) [1]0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [1]
0 (2) [0]
0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]4 (0) [0]0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]
1 (3) [0]
0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]1 (1) [1]0 (0) [2]
0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [1]0 (0) [0]1 (2) [2]
0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [1]
1 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]1 (4) [0]0 (1) [0]
0 (0) [0]
1 (4) [5]
0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]0 (0) [0]0 (0) [1]
0 (2) [0]
1 (2) [2]
0 (0) [0]
2 (0) [0]1 (1) [0]3 (0) [0]
0 (3) [4]
0 (0) [0]
0 (0) [0]0 (0) [0]
2 (3) [0]
2 (2) [0]
Intersection #1
F St./11th Street
Intersection #5
I St./11th St.

Intersection #6
I St./12th St.

Intersection #2
F St./12th St.

Intersection #3
H St./11th St.

Intersection #4
H St./12th St.

Small Pedestrian
Path/Driveway
017-061 - 5/24/11 - JB
Figure
5 Not to Scale
NORTH
City of Union City - Railroad Crossing Closure Study
Existing Bicycle Counts
UNION
CITY
BART

STATION
H ST.

G ST.

I ST.

H ST.

F ST.

E ST.

D ST.

RAILROAD AVE.

BART
WHIPPLE RD.

MISSION BLVD.

DECOTO RD.

ALVARADO-NILES RD.
11th ST.
10th ST.
1 2
3 4
5 6
J ST.
12th ST.
13th ST.
14th ST.

LEGEND
Study Intersection
AM Peak Hour Volumes
School Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
[XX]
City Council/RSA Agenda 90 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 10 ends

At-grade Crossing Pedestrian Volumes
As part of the study, TJKM counted the number of pedestrians crossing the railway tracks at the three at-grade crossings at ‘F’ Street, ‘H’ Street and ‘I’ Street. Similar to the intersection turning movement counts, the pedestrian counts were collected on a typical weekday when the James Logan High School and the Searles Elementary School were in session for the a.m. peak period (7:00 – 9:00 a.m.), p.m. peak period (4:00 – 6:00 p.m.), and the school peak period (2:00 – 4:00 p.m.).

Figure 6 illustrates the weekday hourly pedestrian volumes at the existing at-grade crossings.

During the peak periods, ‘F’ Street has the highest number of pedestrians (48 percent) crossing the railroad tracks with 164 pedestrians. ‘F’ Street pedestrian crossing peaks at 78 pedestrians between the hour of 2:00 and 3:00 p.m. , which coincides with the release of students from the neighboring schools. During the peak periods, ‘I’ Street has the second highest number of pedestrians (37 percent) crossing the railroad tracks with 125 pedestrians. ‘I’ Street pedestrian crossing peaks at 42 pedestrians between the hour of 3:00 and 4:00 p.m., which coincides with the release of James Logan High School students. Finally, the number of pedestrians during the peak periods observed on ‘H’ Street was 51 pedestrians (15 percent) with the peak between the hours of 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.

Figure 6: Existing Weekday At-grade Pedestrian Crossing Volumes: F, H and I Streets June 29, 2011
Study Intersections, and Scenarios
The study focused on evaluating traffic conditions at the existing study intersections that may potentially be impacted by the potential closure of an existing at-grade crossing. The study intersections are shown in Figure 2.

Intersections:

1. ‘F’ Street / 11th Street

2. ‘F’ Street / 12th Street

3. ‘H’ Street / 11th Street

4. ‘H’ Street / 12th Street

5. ‘I’ Street / 11th Street

6. ‘I’ Street / 12th Street
City Council/RSA Agenda 91 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 11 ends

June 29, 2011
The following scenarios were addressed in the study:

1. Existing Conditions – This scenario evaluates existing (March 2011) traffic volumes and roadway conditions based on traffic counts and field surveys.

2. Existing plus ‘F’ Street Closure Conditions – This scenario analyzes the effects of the possible closure of the existing at-grade railroad crossing at ‘F’ Street. The existing traffic volumes are redistributed to the adjacent roadways based on existing travel patterns and knowledge of the study area.

3. Existing plus ‘H’ Street Closure Conditions – This scenario analyzes the effects of the possible closure of the existing at-grade railroad crossing at ‘H’ Street. The existing traffic volumes are redistributed to the adjacent roadways based on existing travel patterns and knowledge of the study area.

4. Existing plus ‘I’ Street Closure Conditions – This scenario analyzes the effects of the possible closure of the existing at-grade railroad crossing at ‘I’ Street. The existing traffic volumes are redistributed to the adjacent roadways based on existing travel patterns and knowledge of the study area.

Collision History
TJKM obtained the latest collision data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the six study intersections from the local California Highway Patrol (CHP) office to perform collision analysis. The collision analysis was conducted for a five-year period between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009. The records indicate that there have been four collisions near the intersection of ‘F’ Street/11th Street; two at the intersection and the other within 130 feet to the west. The records indicates that six collisions have occurred near the intersection of ‘H’ Street/11th Street, of these five collisions occurred at the intersection and the other approximately 200 feet to the west. The records indicate that two collisions have occurred near the intersection of ‘I’ Street/11th Street, of which one collision occurred at the intersection and the other at approximately 65 feet east of the intersection. However, none of the collisions included in the SWITR database were related to the at-grade crossing or occurred within the railroad right-of-way.

No collisions have been reported for the intersections of ‘F’ Street/12th Street, ‘H’ Street/ 12th Street and ‘I’ Street/12th Street. TJKM also reviewed the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) Web Accident Prediction System that shows the crossing accident history and trends at all highway-railroad crossing locations. Based on the data from FRA there are no reported accidents on the Oakland Subdivision Line within the City of Union City limits. Collision diagrams based on the SWITRS and the accident prediction reports from FRA are included in Appendix C.

City Council/RSA Agenda 92 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 12 ends

June 29, 2011
Results of Level of Service Analysis
Table II summarizes the levels of service at the study intersections under existing conditions scenario. Levels of service worksheets for existing traffic conditions are provided in Appendix D.

Currently, all the study intersections operate at LOS C or better during each of the study peak hours.

Table II: Existing Intersection Level of Service Results ID Intersection Control
Existing Conditions
A.M. Peak
Hour
M.D. Peak
Hour
P.M. Peak
Hour
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 ‘F’ Street and 11th Street Two-Way Stop 14.3 B 11.6 B 10.3 B 2 ‘F’ Street and 12th Street Two-Way Stop 9.9 A 9.7 A 8.8 A 3 ‘H’ Street and 11th Street Two-Way Stop 17.3 C 14.7 B 12.1 B 4 ‘H’ Street and 12th Street Two-Way Stop 17.0 C 13.4 B 11.3 B 5 ‘I’ Street and 11th Street Two-Way Stop 10.0 A 9.7 A 10.1 B 6 ‘I’ Street and 12th Street Two-Way Stop 8.7 A 8.7 A 9.3 A Notes: LOS = Level of Service of worst movement on stop controlled intersections

City Council/RSA Agenda 93 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 13 ends

June 29, 2011
Impacts of ‘F’ Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure ‘F’ Street Closure Description and Traffic Redistribution This scenario analyzes the effects of the possible closure of the existing at-grade railroad crossing at ‘F’ Street. ‘F’ Street would be closed at 12th Street and a point just east of the railroad, but southwest of 11th Street. The existing traffic volumes were then redistributed to the adjacent roadways based on existing travel patterns and knowledge of the study area. The redistributed traffic volumes and lane geometry that take into account the closure of ‘F’ Street are illustrated in Figure 7.

Existing plus ‘F’ Street Closure Conditions
The study intersection levels of service calculations are included in Appendix E. To evaluate the impacts of ‘F’ Street closure, Table III summarizes the levels of service at the study intersections under both Existing Conditions and ‘F’ Street Closed Conditions. With the closure of the at-grade crossing at ‘F’ Street, two of the six study intersections are expected to exceed acceptable LOS thresholds during the a.m. peak hour. The intersections of ‘H’ Street/11th Street and ‘H’ Street/ 12th Street are expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour.

Table III: ‘F’ Street Closure Intersection Level of Service Results ID Intersection Control
Existing Conditions ‘F’ Street Closed Condition
A.M. Peak
Hour
M.D. Peak
Hour
P.M. Peak
Hour
A.M. Peak
Hour
M.D. Peak
Hour
P.M. Peak
Hour
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS 1 ‘F’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 14.3 B 11.6 B 10.3 B 11.2 B 10.0 A 9.7 A
2 ‘F’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 9.9 A 9.7 A 8.8 A * * * * * *
3 ‘H’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 17.3 C 14.7 B 12.1 B 103.9 F 19.5 C 14.5 B
4 ‘H’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 17.0 C 13.4 B 11.3 B 63.8 F 17.6 C 13.4 B
5 ‘I’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 10.0 A 9.7 A 10.1 B 9.8 A 9.7 A 10.0 A
6 ‘I’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 8.7 A 8.7 A 9.3 A 8.7 A 8.6 A 9.4 A
Notes: LOS = Level of Service of worst movement on stop controlled intersections * = Not Applicable
Emergency Vehicle Access Evaluation
The impacts on emergency vehicle access routes that may be caused by the potential closure of ‘F’ Street were qualitatively analyzed. An emergency vehicle that would currently utilize the ‘F’ Street at-grade railroad crossing would need to incur up to an additional 0.39 miles of travel distance. Of the three at-grade crossing closures being considered, the closure of ‘F’ Street would cause most impact to emergency vehicle response times. .

City Council/RSA Agenda 94 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
2 (1) [2]
88 (45) [25]
22 (18) [30]
7 (10) [10]
72 (38) [45]2 (2) [0]
108 (69) [47]
331 (284) [216]
43 (20) [19]
38 (27) [22]26 (29) [44]28 (25) [39]
4 (5) [4]
464 (230) [158]
22 (13) [10]
158 (76) [45]25 (12) [21]1 (0) [0]
0 (0) [2]
3 (5) [10]
5 (13) [6]
11 (18) [22]
75 (80) [95]
9 (5) [17]
6 (1) [2]
6 (6) [11]
13 (6) [6]
1 (0) [4]83 (47) [46]2 (2) [5]
1 (2) [4]
7 (11) [13]
0 (0) [1]
1 (0) [0]0 (0) [1]0 (0) [0]
6 (5) [5]
9 (17) [27]
0 (0) [1]
0 (6) [5]0 (0) [0]3 (6) [3]
3 (6) [3]
363 (272) [225]
5 (5) [0]
4 (3) [1]1 (7) [1]1 (2) [5]
129 (61) [39]
549 (253) [182]
2 (3) [1]
2 (4) [2]3 (1) [6]131 (92) [54]
Intersection #1
F St./11th Street
Intersection #5
I St./11th St.

Intersection #6
I St./12th St.

Intersection #2
F St./12th St.

Intersection #3
H St./11th St.

Intersection #4
H St./12th St.

Small Pedestrian
Path/Driveway
017-061 - 5/24/11 - JB
Figure
7 Not to Scale
NORTH
City of Union City - Railroad Crossing Closure Study
F Street Closed - Turning Movement Volumes and Lane Geometry UNION
CITY
BART

STATION
H ST.

G ST.

I ST.

H ST.

F ST.

E ST.

D ST.

RAILROAD AVE.

BART
WHIPPLE RD.

MISSION BLVD.

DECOTO RD.

ALVARADO-NILES RD.
11th ST.
10th ST.
1 2
3 4
5 6
J ST.
12th ST.
13th ST.
14th ST.

LEGEND
Study Intersection
Stop Sign
AM Peak Hour Volumes
School Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
[XX]
CLOSED
CLOSED
City Council/RSA Agenda 95 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 15 ends

June 29, 2011
Impacts of ‘H’ Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure ‘H’ Street Closure Description and Traffic Redistribution This scenario analyzes the effects of the possible closure of the existing at-grade railroad crossing at ‘H’ Street. ‘H’ Street would be closed at 12th Street and a point just east of the railroad tracks, but southwest of 11th Street. The existing traffic volumes were then redistributed to the adjacent roadways based on existing travel patterns and knowledge of the study area. The redistributed traffic volumes and lane geometry that take into account the closure of ‘H’ Street are illustrated in Figure 8.

Existing plus ‘H’ Street Closure Conditions
The study intersection levels of service calculations are included in Appendix F. To evaluate the impacts of ‘H’ Street closure, Table IV summarizes the levels of service at the study intersections under both Existing Conditions and ‘H’ Street Closed Conditions. With the closure of the at-grade crossing at ‘H’ Street, the intersection of ‘F’ Street and 11th Street is expected to exceed acceptable LOS thresholds during the a.m. peak hour. The intersection of ‘F’ Street/11th Street is expected to operate at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour.

Table IV: ‘H’ Street Closure Intersection Level of Service Results ID Intersection Control
Existing Conditions ‘H’ Street Closed Condition
A.M. Peak
Hour
M.D. Peak
Hour
P.M. Peak
Hour
A.M. Peak
Hour
M.D. Peak
Hour
P.M. Peak
Hour
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS 1 ‘F’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 14.3 B 11.6 B 10.3 B 39.0 E 14.2 B 12.0 B
2 ‘F’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 9.9 A 9.7 A 8.8 A 10.6 B 9.7 A 9.2 A
3 ‘H’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 17.3 C 14.7 B 12.1 B 16.2 C 11.3 B 10.7 B
4 ‘H’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 17.0 C 13.4 B 11.3 B 12.1 B 11.6 B 10.8 B
5 ‘I’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 10.0 A 9.7 A 10.1 B 18.5 C 11.7 B 11.4 B
6 ‘I’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 8.7 A 8.7 A 9.3 A 11.8 B 10.4 B 10.3 B
Notes: LOS = Level of Service of worst movement on stop controlled intersections

Emergency Vehicle Access Evaluation
The impacts on emergency vehicle access routes that may be caused by the potential closure of ‘H’ Street were qualitatively analyzed. An emergency vehicle that would currently utilize the ‘H’ Street at-grade railroad crossing would need to incur between 0.25 and 0.39 miles (dependent on which route is taken) of additional travel distance. Of the three at-grade crossing closure being considered, the closure of ‘H’ Street would cause the second highest impact to emergency vehicle response times.

City Council/RSA Agenda 96 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
193 (100) [72]
216 (101) [76]
26 (29) [44]28 (25) [39]
40 (19) [27]1 (0) [0]
21 (17) [7]
309 (227) [171]
6 (4) [3]
210 (101) [78]
22 (18) [30]
7 (10) [10]
2 (1) [2]
174 (80) [43]
1 (5) [3]
45 (26) [12]27 (12) [33]2 (2) [0]
0 (0) [0]
148 (131) [110]
5 (13) [6]
25 (30) [31]75 (80) [95]
9 (5) [17]
6 (1) [2]
6 (6) [11]
13 (6) [6]
203 (107) [81]83 (47) [46]191 (97) [73]
1 (2) [4]
7 (11) [13]
0 (0) [1]
1 (0) [0]0 (0) [1]0 (0) [0]
6 (5) [5]
227 (118) [105]
0 (0) [1]
15 (7) [6]0 (12) [21]146 (121) [103]
4 (3) [1]1 (7) [1]
145 (119) [98]
147 (118) [95] 2 (4) [2]
3 (1) [6]
158 (91) [71]
2 (0) [2]
3 (5) [0]
194 (159) [113]
453 (208) [137]
9 (8) [6]
Intersection #1
F St./11th Street
Intersection #5
I St./11th St.

Intersection #6
I St./12th St.

Intersection #2
F St./12th St.

Intersection #3
H St./11th St.

Intersection #4
H St./12th St.

Small Pedestrian
Path/Driveway
CLOSED
CLOSED
017-061 - 5/24/11 - JB
Figure
8 Not to Scale
NORTH
City of Union City - Railroad Crossing Closure Study
H Street Closed - Turning Movement Volumes and Lane Geometry UNION
CITY
BART

STATION
H ST.

G ST.

I ST.

H ST.

F ST.

E ST.

D ST.

RAILROAD AVE.

BART
WHIPPLE RD.

MISSION BLVD.

DECOTO RD.

ALVARADO-NILES RD.
11th ST.
10th ST.
1 2
3 4
5 6
J ST.
12th ST.
13th ST.
14th ST.

LEGEND
Study Intersection
Stop Sign
AM Peak Hour Volumes
School Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
[XX]
City Council/RSA Agenda 97 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 17 ends

June 29, 2011
Impacts of ‘I’ Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure ‘I’ Street Closure Description and Traffic Redistribution This scenario analyzes the effects of the possible closure of the existing at-grade railroad crossing at ‘I’ Street. ‘I’ Street would be closed at 12th Street and a point just east of the railroad tracks, but southwest of 11th Street. The existing traffic volumes were then redistributed to the adjacent roadways based on existing travel patterns and knowledge of the study area. The redistributed traffic volumes and lane geometry that take into account the closure of ‘I’ Street are illustrated in Figure 9.

Existing plus ‘I’ Street Closure Conditions
The study intersection levels of service calculations are included in Appendix G. To evaluate the impacts of ‘I’ Street closure, Table V summarizes the levels of service at the study intersections under both Existing Conditions and ‘I’ Street Closed Conditions. The operational analyses reveal that the closure of the ‘I’ Street at-grade railroad crossing will have little to no effect on the average delays at the nearby study intersections. Similar to Existing Conditions, with the closure of the at-grade railroad crossing at ‘I’ Street, all of the study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better during each of the study peak hours.

Table V: ‘I’ Street Closure Intersection Level of Service Results ID Intersection Control
Existing Conditions ‘I’ Street Closed Condition
A.M. Peak
Hour
M.D. Peak
Hour
P.M. Peak
Hour
A.M. Peak
Hour
M.D. Peak
Hour
P.M. Peak
Hour
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS 1 ‘F’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 14.3 B 11.6 B 10.3 B 13.0 B 10.4 B 10.0 A
2 ‘F’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 9.9 A 9.7 A 8.8 A 9.6 A 9.1 A 8.7 A
3 ‘H’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 17.3 C 14.7 B 12.1 B 20.1 C 14.5 B 13.3 B
4 ‘H’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 17.0 C 13.4 B 11.3 B 17.0 C 12.5 B 11.3 B
5 ‘I’ Street and
11th Street
Two-Way
Stop 10.0 A 9.7 A 10.1 B 9.8 A 9.7 A 9.9 A
6 ‘I’ Street and
12th Street
Two-Way
Stop 8.7 A 8.7 A 9.3 A 8.6 A 8.3 A 9.3 A
Notes: LOS = Level of Service of worst movement on stop controlled intersections Emergency Vehicle Access Evaluation
The impacts on emergency vehicle access routes that may be caused by the potential closure of ‘I’ Street were qualitatively analyzed. An emergency vehicle that would currently utilize ‘I’ Street at-grade railroad crossing would need to travel approximately 0.25 miles of additional travel distance. Of the three at-grade crossing closures being considered, the closure of ‘I’ Street would cause the least impact to emergency vehicle, since very few properties are currently served directly from ‘I’ Street.

City Council/RSA Agenda 98 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
21 (17) [7]
164 (101) [71]
6 (4) [3]
21 (6) [10]
22 (18) [30]
7 (10) [10]
2 (1) [2]
174 (80) [43]
1 (5) [3]
45 (26) [12]27 (12) [33]2 (2) [0]
12 (8) [6]
243 (241) [193]
43 (20) [19]
45 (48) [54]26 (29) [44]28 (25) [39]
4 (5) [4]
377 (190) [136]
22 (13) [10]
15 (7) [6]25 (12) [21]1 (0) [0]
3 (6) [3]
284 (226) [189]
5 (5) [0]
4 (3) [1]1 (7) [1]
11 (19) [21]
7 (3) [6]
427 (195) [149]
2 (3) [1]
2 (4) [2]3 (1) [6]12 (16) [4]
86 (98) [117]
9 (5) [17]
12 (7) [13]
13 (6) [6]
83 (47) [46]2 (2) [5]
8 (13) [17]
0 (0) [1]
1 (0) [0]0 (0) [1]
0 (6) [5]0 (0) [0]
158 (91) [71]
2 (0) [2]
3 (5) [0]
40 (30) [14]
250 (129) [92]
9 (8) [6]
Intersection #1
F St./11th Street
Intersection #5
I St./11th St.

Intersection #6
I St./12th St.

Intersection #2
F St./12th St.

Intersection #3
H St./11th St.

Intersection #4
H St./12th St.

Small Pedestrian
Path/Driveway
017-061 - 5/24/11 - JB
Figure
9 Not to Scale
NORTH
City of Union City - Railroad Crossing Closure Study
I Street Closed - Turning Movement Volumes and Lane Geometry UNION
CITY
BART

STATION
H ST.

G ST.

I ST.

H ST.

F ST.

E ST.

D ST.

RAILROAD AVE.

BART
WHIPPLE RD.

MISSION BLVD.

DECOTO RD.

ALVARADO-NILES RD.
11th ST.
10th ST.
1 2
3 4
5 6
J ST.
12th ST.
13th ST.
14th ST.

LEGEND
Study Intersection
Stop Sign
AM Peak Hour Volumes
School Peak Hour Volumes
PM Peak Hour Volumes
XX
(XX)
[XX]
CLOSED
CLOSED
City Council/RSA Agenda 99 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 19 ends

June 29, 2011
Ranking and Evaluation Criteria for At-grade Crossing Closure Priority Ranking Criteria
To assist the City in determining which existing at-grade railroad crossing should be considered for closure, TJKM developed a priority ranking criteria. The at-grade crossing closure priority ranking criteria is based on several factors, including the effects on overall traffic delay at the study intersections, increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as a result of closures, affected ADT, and affected pedestrians. A point system for each of these criteria was established as follows:
• One point for each ten miles increase in VMT,
• One point for each two-seconds increase in delay,
• One point for each 100 daily vehicle trips that are impacted, and • One point for every pedestrian that is impacted.

Due to the nature of the point system established, the at-grade crossing closure with the highest points would have the greatest negative effect. Therefore, the at-grade crossing closure with the lowest points would have the least impact and ranked highest for closure. Table VI summarizes the priority ranking criteria and the overall ranking of the three potential at-grade crossing closures considered as part of this study. As shown in Table VI, the closure of the at-grade crossing at ‘I’ Street ranks the highest. However, as noted previously in the study, the ‘I’ Street at-grade crossing serves 37 percent of the pedestrians crossing the railroad tracks within the study area.

Therefore it is recommended that a pedestrian at-grade crossing be retained as it is unlikely that pedestrians will walk an additional quarter mile to cross the tracks at the ‘H’ Street crossing. As a result, TJKM recommends that the existing ‘I’ Street at-grade crossing be considered for closure, but allow pedestrians to cross the railroad tracks at this location.

Table VI: At-grade Crossing Closure Priority Ranking Criteria Scenario
Increase in
Daily VMT
(miles)
VMT
Points
Change in System
Delay
Of Combined
Peak Periods
(seconds)
Delay
Points
Existing
ADT
ADT
Points
Existing
Peds
Ped
Points
Total
Points Rank
‘F’ Street
Closure 944 94 121 61 2420 242 164 17 414 2
‘H’ Street
Closure 1422 142 36 18 4445 445 51 6 611 3
‘I’ Street
Closure 133 13 2 1 532 54 125 13 81 1
Notes: One point for each 10 miles increase in VMT
One point for each 2 seconds increase delay
One point for each 100 daily vehicles trips that are re-routed One point for each 10 pedestrians that are re-routed during the peak periods City Council/RSA Agenda 100 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 20 ends

June 29, 2011
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions and recommendations regarding which of the three existing at-grade railroad crossings of the Oakland Subdivision Line should be considered for closure are provided below:

Existing plus ‘I’ Street Closure Conditions
• Similar to the existing conditions, under this scenario all study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better during each of the peak periods. • Of the three at-grade crossing closures being considered, the closure of ‘I’ Street would cause the least impact to emergency vehicles and the least increase in VMT. • ‘I’ Street ranks the highest for consideration of the at-grade crossing closure. However, the ‘I’ Street at-grade crossing serves 37 percent of the pedestrian traffic. As a result, it is recommended that the existing ‘I’ Street at-grade crossing be considered for closure, but allow pedestrians to cross the railroad tracks at this location.

City Council/RSA Agenda 101 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants
Final Report - Traffic Impact Analysis of the At-Grade Railroad Crossing Closure Study

Page 21 ends

June 29, 2011
Study Participants
TJKM Personnel
Joy Bhattacharya, P.E., PTOE Project Manager
Jose Luis Benavides, P.E. Senior Associate
Jeff Lacap Project Engineer
Cindy DeRouchey Word Processing
Persons Consulted
Michael Renk City of Union City, Civil Engineer II
References
• Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Washington DC, 2000.

City Council/RSA Agenda 102 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants

Appendix A – Level of Service Methodology
City Council/RSA Agenda 103 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Level of Service Page A-1
TJKM Transportation Consultants Appendix A

APPENDIX A

LEVEL OF SERVICE
The description and procedures for calculating capacity and level of service are found in Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 2000. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 represents the latest research on capacity and quality of service for transportation facilities.

Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.

Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each level, from A to F, with level-of-service A representing the best operating conditions and level-of-service F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and the driver’s perception of these conditions. Safety is not included in the measures that establish service levels.

A general description of service levels for various types of facilities is shown in Table A-I.

Table A-I
Level of Service Description
Uninterrupted Flow Interrupted Flow
Facility Type Freeways
Multi-lane Highways
Two-lane Highways
Urban Streets
Signalized Intersections
Unsignalized Intersections
Two-way Stop Control
All-way Stop Control
LOS
A Free-flow Very low delay.

B Stable flow. Presence of other
users noticeable.

Low delay.

C Stable flow. Comfort and
convenience starts to decline.

Acceptable delay.

D High density stable flow. Tolerable delay.

E Unstable flow. Limit of acceptable delay.

F Forced or breakdown flow. Unacceptable delay
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000
City Council/RSA Agenda 104 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Page A-2 Level of Service
Appendix A TJKM Transportation Consultants
Urban Streets
The term “urban streets” refers to urban arterials and collectors, including those in downtown areas.

Arterial streets are roads that primarily serve longer through trips. However, providing access to abutting commercial and residential land uses is also an important function of arterials.

Collector streets provide both land access and traffic circulation within residential, commercial and industrial areas. Their access function is more important than that of arterials, and unlike arterials their operation is not always dominated by traffic signals.

Downtown streets are signalized facilities that often resemble arterials. They not only move through traffic but also provide access to local businesses for passenger cars, transit buses, and trucks. Pedestrian conflicts and lane obstructions created by stopping or standing buses, trucks and parking vehicles that cause turbulence in the traffic flow are typical of downtown streets.

The speed of vehicles on urban streets is influenced by three main factors, street environment, interaction among vehicles and traffic control. As a result, these factors also affect quality of service.

The street environment includes the geometric characteristics of the facility, the character of roadside activity and adjacent land uses. Thus, the environment reflects the number and width of lanes, type of median, driveway density, spacing between signalized intersections, existence of parking, level of pedestrian activity and speed limit.

The interaction among vehicles is determined by traffic density, the proportion of trucks and buses, and turning movements. This interaction affects the operation of vehicles at intersections and, to a lesser extent, between signals.

Traffic control (including signals and signs) forces a portion of all vehicles to slow or stop. The delays and speed changes caused by traffic control devices reduce vehicle speeds, however, such controls are needed to establish right-of-way.

The average travel speed for through vehicles along an urban street is the determinant of the operating level of service. The travel speed along a segment, section or entire length of an urban street is dependent on the running speed between signalized intersections and the amount of control delay incurred at signalized intersections.

Level-of-service A describes primarily free-flow operations. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal.

Level-of-service B describes reasonably unimpeded operations. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and control delays at signalized intersections are not significant.

Level-of-service C describes stable operations, however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock location may be more restricted than at level-of-service B. Longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower travel speeds.

Level-of-service D borders on a range in which in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. Level-of-service D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or a combination of these factors.

City Council/RSA Agenda 105 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Level of Service Page A-3
TJKM Transportation Consultants Appendix A
Level-of-service E is characterized by significant delays and lower travel speeds. Such operations are caused by a combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing.

Level-of-service F is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays, high volumes, and extensive queuing.

The methodology to determine level of service stratifies urban streets into four classifications. The classifications are complex, and are related to functional and design categories.

Once classified, the urban street is divided into segments for analysis. An urban street segment is a oneway section of street encompassing a series of blocks or links terminating at a signalized intersection.

Adjacent segments of urban streets may be combined to form larger street sections, provided that the segments have similar demand flows and characteristics.

Levels of service are related to the average travel speed of vehicles along the urban street segment or section.

Travel times for existing conditions are obtained by field measurements. The maximum-car technique is used. The vehicle is driven at the posted speed limit unless impeded by actual traffic conditions. In the maximum-car technique, a safe level of vehicular operation is maintained by observing proper following distances and by changing speeds at reasonable rates of acceleration and deceleration. The maximum-car technique provides the best base for measuring traffic performance.

An observer records the travel time and locations and duration of delay. The beginning and ending points are the centers of intersections. Delays include times waiting in queues at signalized intersections. The travel speed is determined by dividing the length of the segment by the travel time. Once the travel speed on the arterial is determined, the level of service is found by comparing the speed to the criteria in Table A-II. Level-of-service criteria vary for the different classifications of urban street, reflecting differences in driver expectations.

City Council/RSA Agenda 106 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Level of Service Page A-4
TJKM Transportation Consultants Appendix A
Table A-II
Urban Street Levels of Service by Class
Urban Street Class I II III IV
Range of Free Flow Speeds
(mph)
45 to 55 35 to 45 30 to 35 25 to 35
Typical Free Flow Speed (mph) 50 40 33 30
Level of Service Average Travel Speed (mph)
A >42 >35 >30 >25
B >34 >28 >24 >19
C >27 >22 >18 >13
D >21 >17 >14 >9
E >16 >13 >10 >7
F ≤16 ≤13 ≤10 ≤7
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000
Interrupted Flow
One of the more important elements limiting, and often interrupting the flow of traffic on a highway is the intersection. Flow on an interrupted facility is usually dominated by points of fixed operation such as traffic signals, stop and yield signs. These all operate quite differently and have differing impacts on overall flow.

Signalized Intersections
The capacity of a highway is related primarily to the geometric characteristics of the facility, as well as to the composition of the traffic stream on the facility. Geometrics are a fixed, or non-varying, characteristic of a facility.

At the signalized intersection, an additional element is introduced into the concept of capacity: time allocation. A traffic signal essentially allocates time among conflicting traffic movements seeking use of the same physical space. The way in which time is allocated has a significant impact on the operation of the intersection and on the capacity of the intersection and its approaches.

Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, traffic and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions, i. e., in the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, any incidents, and any other vehicles. Specifically, level of service criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of average control delay per vehicle, typically for a 15-minute analysis period. Delay is a complex measure and depends on a number of variables, including the quality of progression, the cycle length, the ratio of green time to cycle length and the volume to capacity ratio for the lane group.

For each intersection analyzed the average control delay per vehicle per approach is determined for the peak hour. A weighted average of control delay per vehicle is then determined for the intersection. A level of service designation is given to the control delay to better describe the level of operation. A City Council/RSA Agenda 107 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Page A-5 Level of Service
Appendix A TJKM Transportation Consultants
description of levels of service for signalized intersections can be found in Table A-III.

Table A-III
Description of Level of Service for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Description
A Very low control delay, up to 10 seconds per vehicle. Progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase.

Many vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may tend to contribute to low delay values.

B Control delay greater than 10 and up to 20 seconds per vehicle. There is good progression or short cycle lengths or both. More vehicles stop causing higher levels of delay.

C Control delay greater than 20 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle. Higher delays are caused by fair progression or longer cycle lengths or both.

Individual cycle failures may begin to appear. Cycle failure occurs when a given green phase doe not serve queued vehicles, and overflow occurs. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping.

D Control delay greater than 35 and up to 55 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestions becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volumes. Many vehicles stop, the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable.

E Control delay greater than 55 and up to 80 seconds per vehicle. The limit of acceptable delay. High delays usually indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volumes. Individual cycle failures are frequent.

F Control delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. Unacceptable to most drivers. Oversaturation, arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing factors to higher delay.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000
The use of control delay, which may also be referred to as signal delay, was introduced in the 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual, and represents a departure from previous updates. In the third edition, published in 1985 and the 1994 update to the third edition, delay only included stopped delay. Thus, the level of service criteria listed in Table A-III differs from earlier criteria.

Unsignalized Intersections
The current procedures on unsignalized intersections were first introduced in the 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual and represent a revision of the methodology published in the 1994 update to the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. The revised procedures use control delay as a measure of effectiveness to determine level of service. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, traffic and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions, i. e., in the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, any incidents, and any other vehicles. Control delay is the increased time of travel for a vehicle approaching and passing through an unsignalized intersection, compared with a free-flow vehicle if it were not required to slow or stop at the intersection.

City Council/RSA Agenda 108 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Level of Service Page A-6
TJKM Transportation Consultants Appendix A
Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersections
Two-way stop controlled intersections in which stop signs are used to assign the right-of-way, are the most prevalent type of intersection in the United States. At two-way stop-controlled intersections the stop-controlled approaches are referred as the minor street approaches and can be either public streets or private driveways. The approaches that are not controlled by stop signs are referred to as the major street approaches.

The capacity of movements subject to delay are determined using the "critical gap" method of capacity analysis. Expected average control delay based on movement volume and movement capacity is calculated. A level of service designation is given to the expected control delay for each minor movement. Level of service is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Control delay is the increased time of travel for a vehicle approaching and passing through a stop-controlled intersection, compared with a free-flow vehicle if it were not required to slow or stop at the intersection. A description of levels of service for two-way stop-controlled intersections is found in Table A-IV.

Table A-IV
Description of Level of Service for Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersections Level of Service Description
A Very low control delay less than 10 seconds per
vehicle for each movement subject to delay.

B Low control delay greater than 10 and up to 15
seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to
delay.

C Acceptable control delay greater than 15 and up to 25 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to
delay.

D Tolerable control delay greater than 25 and up to 35
seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to
delay.

E Limit of tolerable control delay greater than 35 and
up to 50 seconds per vehicle for each movement
subject to delay.

F Unacceptable control delay in excess of 50 seconds
per vehicle for each movement subject to delay.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000

APP A LOS-HCM 200.pdf
City Council/RSA Agenda 109 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants

Appendix B – Existing Counts
City Council/RSA Agenda 110 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
11th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 0 4 0 0 4 0 9 0 1 9 1 4 1 0 6 0 9 1 1 10 2 29 31
07:15 1 6 0 0 7 1 16 0 1 17 2 1 0 0 3 1 16 0 0 17 1 44 45 07:30 1 10 6 0 17 1 43 1 5 45 1 2 1 0 4 3 28 1 0 32 5 98 103 07:45 0 10 12 0 22 1 70 1 4 72 10 4 2 0 16 5 38 2 0 45 4 155 159 Total 2 30 18 0 50 3 138 2 11 143 14 11 4 0 29 9 91 4 1 104 12 326 338 08:00 0 8 11 0 19 0 22 0 1 22 3 3 2 0 8 8 55 1 6 64 7 113 120 08:15 1 3 6 0 10 0 39 1 0 40 1 5 2 0 8 3 35 1 0 39 0 97 97 08:30 1 6 16 0 23 0 43 0 1 43 7 10 1 0 18 5 36 2 1 43 2 127 129 08:45 0 5 0 0 5 0 12 0 0 12 1 1 0 0 2 2 12 2 0 16 0 35 35 Total 2 22 33 0 57 0 116 1 2 117 12 19 5 0 36 18 138 6 7 162 9 372 381 14:00 0 4 7 1 11 0 26 1 2 27 6 3 0 1 9 3 33 6 4 42 8 89 97 14:15 0 4 1 2 5 1 18 0 0 19 1 7 2 0 10 5 35 3 6 43 8 77 85 14:30 0 4 2 0 6 0 17 0 2 17 0 4 3 1 7 2 17 1 2 20 5 50 55 14:45 1 5 1 1 7 0 8 1 0 9 2 5 1 1 8 8 15 0 3 23 5 47 52 Total 1 17 11 4 29 1 69 2 4 72 9 19 6 3 34 18 100 10 15 128 26 263 289 15:00 0 1 2 0 3 2 18 0 0 20 1 3 1 2 5 0 8 0 0 8 2 36 38 15:15 1 5 5 2 11 1 12 0 2 13 0 7 1 1 8 1 9 1 0 11 5 43 48 15:30 0 3 11 1 14 0 31 0 0 31 2 1 3 1 6 11 50 1 0 62 2 113 115 15:45 1 3 8 0 12 2 19 1 1 22 3 7 5 3 15 5 34 2 4 41 8 90 98 Total 2 12 26 3 40 5 80 1 3 86 6 18 10 7 34 17 101 4 4 122 17 282 299 16:00 0 3 7 2 10 1 16 0 0 17 2 8 0 3 10 2 20 0 4 22 9 59 68 16:15 0 6 3 0 9 4 10 0 0 14 1 11 1 0 13 6 18 1 1 25 1 61 62 16:30 0 2 3 1 5 1 10 0 1 11 1 11 2 1 14 2 11 1 0 14 3 44 47 16:45 0 6 2 0 8 0 10 1 2 11 4 9 3 2 16 2 18 0 3 20 7 55 62 Total 0 17 15 3 32 6 46 1 3 53 8 39 6 6 53 12 67 2 8 81 20 219 239 17:00 0 7 4 1 11 1 11 0 1 12 0 6 1 0 7 1 8 0 1 9 3 39 42 17:15 0 9 1 0 10 1 9 1 1 11 3 4 4 1 11 4 20 0 2 24 4 56 60 17:30 0 11 5 1 16 1 13 0 0 14 3 11 2 1 16 0 25 3 1 28 3 74 77 17:45 1 2 2 2 5 1 17 1 0 19 1 10 3 0 14 1 11 1 2 13 4 51 55 Total 1 29 12 4 42 4 50 2 2 56 7 31 10 2 48 6 64 4 6 74 14 220 234 Grand Total 8 127 115 14 250 19 499 9 25 527 56 137 41 18 234 80 561 30 41 671 98 1682 1780 Apprch % 3.2 50.8 46 3.6 94.7 1.7 23.9 58.5 17.5 11.9 83.6 4.5 Total % 0.5 7.6 6.8 14.9 1.1 29.7 0.5 31.3 3.3 8.1 2.4 13.9 4.8 33.4 1.8 39.9 5.5 94.5 City Council/RSA Agenda 111 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 0 10 12 22 1 70 1 72 10 4 2 16 5 38 2 45 155
08:00 0 8 11 19 0 22 0 22 3 3 2 8 8 55 1 64 113
08:15 1 3 6 10 0 39 1 40 1 5 2 8 3 35 1 39 97
08:30 1 6 16 23 0 43 0 43 7 10 1 18 5 36 2 43 127
Total Volume 2 27 45 74 1 174 2 177 21 22 7 50 21 164 6 191 492 % App. Total 2.7 36.5 60.8 0.6 98.3 1.1 42 44 14 11 85.9 3.1 PHF .500 .675 .703 .804 .250 .621 .500 .615 .525 .550 .875 .694 .656 .745 .750 .746 .794 City Council/RSA Agenda 112 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
11th ST.

Right
45 Thru
27 Left
2 Out In Total
45 74 119
Right
2 Thru
174
Left
1 Out Total In
173 177 350
Left
21 Thru
22 Right
7 Out In Total
34 50 84
Left
21 Thru
164
Right
6 Total Out In
240 191 431
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 113 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 15:00
15:00 0 1 2 3 2 18 0 20 1 3 1 5 0 8 0 8 36
15:15 1 5 5 11 1 12 0 13 0 7 1 8 1 9 1 11 43
15:30 0 3 11 14 0 31 0 31 2 1 3 6 11 50 1 62 113
15:45 1 3 8 12 2 19 1 22 3 7 5 15 5 34 2 41 90
Total Volume 2 12 26 40 5 80 1 86 6 18 10 34 17 101 4 122 282 % App. Total 5 30 65 5.8 93 1.2 17.6 52.9 29.4 13.9 82.8 3.3 PHF .500 .600 .591 .714 .625 .645 .250 .694 .500 .643 .500 .567 .386 .505 .500 .492 .624 City Council/RSA Agenda 114 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
11th ST.

Right
26 Thru
12 Left
2 Out In Total
36 40 76
Right
1 Thru
80 Left
5 Out Total In
113 86 199
Left
6 Thru
18 Right
10 Out In Total
21 34 55
Left
17 Thru
101
Right
4 Total Out In
112 122 234
Peak Hour Begins at 15:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 115 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45
16:45 0 6 2 8 0 10 1 11 4 9 3 16 2 18 0 20 55
17:00 0 7 4 11 1 11 0 12 0 6 1 7 1 8 0 9 39
17:15 0 9 1 10 1 9 1 11 3 4 4 11 4 20 0 24 56
17:30 0 11 5 16 1 13 0 14 3 11 2 16 0 25 3 28 74
Total Volume 0 33 12 45 3 43 2 48 10 30 10 50 7 71 3 81 224 % App. Total 0 73.3 26.7 6.2 89.6 4.2 20 60 20 8.6 87.7 3.7 PHF .000 .750 .600 .703 .750 .827 .500 .857 .625 .682 .625 .781 .438 .710 .250 .723 .757 City Council/RSA Agenda 116 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
11th ST.

Right
12 Thru
33 Left
0 Out In Total
39 45 84
Right
2 Thru
43 Left
3 Out Total In
81 48 129
Left
10 Thru
30 Right
10 Out In Total
39 50 89
Left
7 Thru
71 Right
3 Total Out In
65 81 146
Peak Hour Begins at 16:45
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 117 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Bank 1
11th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:30 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7
15:45 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3
Total 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 2
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 4
17:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2
17:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
17:30 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 6
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 3 0 10 10
Grand Total 0 4 4 0 8 0 2 3 0 5 0 5 1 1 6 2 2 1 0 5 1 24 25 Apprch % 0 50 50 0 40 60 0 83.3 16.7 40 40 20
Total % 0 16.7 16.7 33.3 0 8.3 12.5 20.8 0 20.8 4.2 25 8.3 8.3 4.2 20.8 4 96 11th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:00 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
08:30 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 0 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 7
City Council/RSA Agenda 118 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
PHF .000 .250 .500 .375 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .583 11th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
11th ST.

Right
2 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
2 3 5
Right
0 Thru
2 Left
0 Out Total In
0 2 2
Left
0 Thru
2 Right
0 Out In Total
1 2 3
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
4 0 4
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 15:00
15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15:45 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
% App. Total 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 City Council/RSA Agenda 119 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
11th ST.

Right
2 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 2 2
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
2 0 2
Peak Hour Begins at 15:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 120 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
17:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
17:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:30 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 6
Total Volume 0 3 0 3 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 4 10
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 25 50 25
PHF .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .250 .250 .500 .417 City Council/RSA Agenda 121 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-001 11th-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
11th ST.

Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out In Total
4 3 7
Right
2 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
2 2 4
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
4 1 5
Left
1 Thru
2 Right
1 Total Out In
0 4 4
Peak Hour Begins at 16:45
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 122 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
12th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 0 0 0 3 0 1 10 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 9 0 0 9 3 21 24 07:15 0 0 0 4 0 1 17 0 0 18 0 0 0 1 0 0 18 0 0 18 5 36 41 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 1 49 2 0 6 1 8 0 22 0 0 22 2 79 81 07:45 0 0 0 10 0 2 93 0 1 95 1 0 13 4 14 0 38 0 0 38 15 147 162 Total 0 0 0 17 0 4 169 0 2 173 3 0 20 6 23 0 87 0 0 87 25 283 308 08:00 0 0 0 12 0 0 36 0 0 36 2 0 11 1 13 0 54 1 0 55 13 104 117 08:15 0 0 1 1 1 3 43 0 0 46 0 0 7 1 7 0 33 1 0 34 2 88 90 08:30 0 0 1 9 1 4 63 0 0 67 0 0 9 2 9 0 33 0 0 33 11 110 121 08:45 0 0 1 0 1 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 5 0 5 1 13 1 0 15 0 34 34 Total 0 0 3 22 3 7 155 0 0 162 2 0 32 4 34 1 133 3 0 137 26 336 362 14:00 0 0 0 10 0 0 38 0 1 38 1 0 8 20 9 0 32 1 0 33 31 80 111 14:15 0 0 0 23 0 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 3 19 3 0 42 0 1 42 43 66 109 14:30 0 0 0 6 0 1 17 0 0 18 0 0 7 4 7 0 12 0 0 12 10 37 47 14:45 0 0 0 3 0 1 13 0 0 14 0 0 2 0 2 0 24 1 0 25 3 41 44 Total 0 0 0 42 0 2 89 0 1 91 1 0 20 43 21 0 110 2 1 112 87 224 311 15:00 0 0 0 3 0 1 18 0 0 19 1 0 0 1 1 0 6 0 1 6 5 26 31 15:15 0 0 0 1 0 2 17 0 0 19 3 0 1 2 4 0 12 0 1 12 4 35 39 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 43 0 0 45 0 0 21 2 21 0 40 0 1 40 3 106 109 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 0 0 32 1 0 8 5 9 0 33 0 0 33 5 74 79 Total 0 0 0 4 0 8 107 0 0 115 5 0 30 10 35 0 91 0 3 91 17 241 258 16:00 0 0 0 9 0 1 22 0 0 23 0 0 2 0 2 0 24 0 2 24 11 49 60 16:15 0 0 0 3 0 1 13 0 0 14 0 0 5 0 5 0 17 1 0 18 3 37 40 16:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 2 1 2 0 13 1 0 14 2 29 31 16:45 0 0 0 1 0 4 11 0 0 15 0 0 5 2 5 0 17 0 0 17 3 37 40 Total 0 0 0 14 0 6 59 0 0 65 0 0 14 3 14 0 71 2 2 73 19 152 171 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 1 6 1 0 7 2 0 9 6 25 31 17:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 14 0 0 14 1 0 7 2 8 0 17 0 0 17 4 39 43 17:30 0 0 0 4 0 2 19 0 0 21 0 0 2 0 2 0 26 0 0 26 4 49 53 17:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 19 0 0 20 1 0 0 2 1 0 16 0 0 16 3 37 40 Total 0 0 0 7 0 3 67 0 0 70 2 0 10 10 12 0 66 2 0 68 17 150 167 Grand Total 0 0 3 106 3 30 646 0 3 676 13 0 126 76 139 1 558 9 6 568 191 1386 1577 Apprch % 0 0 100 4.4 95.6 0 9.4 0 90.6 0.2 98.2 1.6
Total % 0 0 0.2 0.2 2.2 46.6 0 48.8 0.9 0 9.1 10 0.1 40.3 0.6 41 12.1 87.9 City Council/RSA Agenda 123 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 0 0 0 0 2 93 0 95 1 0 13 14 0 38 0 38 147
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 36 2 0 11 13 0 54 1 55 104
08:15 0 0 1 1 3 43 0 46 0 0 7 7 0 33 1 34 88
08:30 0 0 1 1 4 63 0 67 0 0 9 9 0 33 0 33 110
Total Volume 0 0 2 2 9 235 0 244 3 0 40 43 0 158 2 160 449 % App. Total 0 0 100 3.7 96.3 0 7 0 93 0 98.8 1.2
PHF .000 .000 .500 .500 .563 .632 .000 .642 .375 .000 .769 .768 .000 .731 .500 .727 .764 City Council/RSA Agenda 124 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
12th ST.

Right
2 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 2 2
Right
0 Thru
235
Left
9 Out Total In
198 244 442
Left
3 Thru
0 Right
40 Out In Total
11 43 54
Left
0 Thru
158
Right
2 Total Out In
240 160 400
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 125 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 15:00
15:00 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 19 1 0 0 1 0 6 0 6 26
15:15 0 0 0 0 2 17 0 19 3 0 1 4 0 12 0 12 35
15:30 0 0 0 0 2 43 0 45 0 0 21 21 0 40 0 40 106
15:45 0 0 0 0 3 29 0 32 1 0 8 9 0 33 0 33 74
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 8 107 0 115 5 0 30 35 0 91 0 91 241 % App. Total 0 0 0 7 93 0 14.3 0 85.7 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .667 .622 .000 .639 .417 .000 .357 .417 .000 .569 .000 .569 .568 City Council/RSA Agenda 126 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
107
Left
8 Out Total In
121 115 236
Left
5 Thru
0 Right
30 Out In Total
8 35 43
Left
0 Thru
91 Right
0 Total Out In
112 91 203
Peak Hour Begins at 15:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 127 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:00
16:00 0 0 0 0 1 22 0 23 0 0 2 2 0 24 0 24 49
16:15 0 0 0 0 1 13 0 14 0 0 5 5 0 17 1 18 37
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 0 2 2 0 13 1 14 29
16:45 0 0 0 0 4 11 0 15 0 0 5 5 0 17 0 17 37
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 6 59 0 65 0 0 14 14 0 71 2 73 152
% App. Total 0 0 0 9.2 90.8 0 0 0 100 0 97.3 2.7
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 .670 .000 .707 .000 .000 .700 .700 .000 .740 .500 .760 .776 City Council/RSA Agenda 128 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
59 Left
6 Out Total In
85 65 150
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
14 Out In Total
8 14 22
Left
0 Thru
71 Right
2 Total Out In
59 73 132
Peak Hour Begins at 16:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 129 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Bank 1
12th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
14:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 3
Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 7 7
15:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 3
Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 6 6
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 3
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 0 10 0 22 22 Apprch % 0 0 0 36.4 63.6 0 0 0 100 0 100 0
Total % 0 0 0 0 18.2 31.8 0 50 0 0 4.5 4.5 0 45.5 0 45.5 0 100 City Council/RSA Agenda 130 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
% App. Total 0 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.000 City Council/RSA Agenda 131 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
2 Left
2 Out Total In
0 4 4
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
2 0 2
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
2 0 2
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 132 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 14:15
14:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
14:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3
15:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 8
% App. Total 0 0 0 40 60 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .750 .000 .625 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .667 City Council/RSA Agenda 133 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
2 Out Total In
3 5 8
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
2 0 2
Left
0 Thru
3 Right
0 Total Out In
3 3 6
Peak Hour Begins at 14:15
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 134 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
F ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
F ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .500 City Council/RSA Agenda 135 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-002 12TH-F
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

F ST.

F ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
4 0 4
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
4 Right
0 Total Out In
0 4 4
Peak Hour Begins at 16:45
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 136 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
11th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 1 6 0 3 7 1 18 1 1 20 5 2 2 0 9 0 7 2 0 9 4 45 49 07:15 0 7 2 0 9 1 40 0 0 41 8 3 1 5 12 0 15 3 0 18 5 80 85 07:30 0 6 7 7 13 5 105 0 0 110 11 4 8 5 23 2 27 8 2 37 14 183 197 07:45 0 9 8 0 17 5 98 2 0 105 12 6 10 4 28 4 57 9 1 70 5 220 225 Total 1 28 17 10 46 12 261 3 1 276 36 15 21 14 72 6 106 22 3 134 28 528 556 08:00 1 6 3 5 10 9 95 0 0 104 7 9 4 7 20 1 42 14 0 57 12 191 203 08:15 0 5 1 14 6 3 109 0 0 112 7 3 6 15 16 1 65 12 2 78 31 212 243 08:30 0 5 3 6 8 5 75 2 1 82 1 8 8 19 17 6 71 8 0 85 26 192 218 08:45 1 4 3 6 8 0 16 0 0 16 3 3 7 5 13 1 69 2 0 72 11 109 120 Total 2 20 10 31 32 17 295 2 1 314 18 23 25 46 66 9 247 36 2 292 80 704 784 14:00 1 7 2 1 10 1 30 0 0 31 7 5 10 1 22 2 34 4 0 40 2 103 105 14:15 1 3 3 6 7 3 18 2 0 23 1 5 3 1 9 1 25 3 1 29 8 68 76 14:30 1 3 1 6 5 6 24 2 2 32 1 5 5 5 11 3 39 4 0 46 13 94 107 14:45 1 3 2 4 6 2 21 1 0 24 3 5 6 5 14 0 29 1 0 30 9 74 83 Total 4 16 8 17 28 12 93 5 2 110 12 20 24 12 56 6 127 12 1 145 32 339 371 15:00 0 2 0 2 2 3 36 0 1 39 7 8 5 1 20 0 35 4 0 39 4 100 104 15:15 0 4 3 0 7 5 50 1 0 56 5 8 8 3 21 0 28 2 0 30 3 114 117 15:30 0 2 3 15 5 2 60 1 1 63 8 6 7 34 21 2 71 5 8 78 58 167 225 15:45 0 4 1 10 5 3 44 3 1 50 4 7 5 54 16 6 89 9 4 104 69 175 244 Total 0 12 7 27 19 13 190 5 3 208 24 29 25 92 78 8 223 20 12 251 134 556 690 16:00 0 4 1 6 5 3 44 1 2 48 2 9 8 7 19 2 52 7 0 61 15 133 148 16:15 0 7 3 0 10 2 30 2 0 34 5 10 16 8 31 2 38 5 1 45 9 120 129 16:30 0 6 1 1 7 4 29 0 2 33 3 13 6 3 22 2 42 1 2 45 8 107 115 16:45 0 4 1 2 5 1 33 1 3 35 7 12 9 1 28 0 43 6 0 49 6 117 123 Total 0 21 6 9 27 10 136 4 7 150 17 44 39 19 100 6 175 19 3 200 38 477 515 17:00 2 3 2 2 7 4 32 0 2 36 4 9 7 4 20 0 39 5 1 44 9 107 116 17:15 0 8 1 1 9 4 30 0 2 34 3 10 10 3 23 2 34 1 2 37 8 103 111 17:30 0 8 2 2 10 6 32 0 0 38 6 11 15 9 32 2 35 6 0 43 11 123 134 17:45 1 4 0 8 5 7 25 0 2 32 2 16 7 3 25 3 35 2 0 40 13 102 115 Total 3 23 5 13 31 21 119 0 6 140 15 46 39 19 100 7 143 14 3 164 41 435 476 Grand Total 10 120 53 107 183 85 1094 19 20 1198 122 177 173 202 472 42 1021 123 24 1186 353 3039 3392 Apprch % 5.5 65.6 29 7.1 91.3 1.6 25.8 37.5 36.7 3.5 86.1 10.4 Total % 0.3 3.9 1.7 6 2.8 36 0.6 39.4 4 5.8 5.7 15.5 1.4 33.6 4 39 10.4 89.6 City Council/RSA Agenda 137 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 0 9 8 17 5 98 2 105 12 6 10 28 4 57 9 70 220
08:00 1 6 3 10 9 95 0 104 7 9 4 20 1 42 14 57 191
08:15 0 5 1 6 3 109 0 112 7 3 6 16 1 65 12 78 212
08:30 0 5 3 8 5 75 2 82 1 8 8 17 6 71 8 85 192
Total Volume 1 25 15 41 22 377 4 403 27 26 28 81 12 235 43 290 815 % App. Total 2.4 61 36.6 5.5 93.5 1 33.3 32.1 34.6 4.1 81 14.8 PHF .250 .694 .469 .603 .611 .865 .500 .900 .563 .722 .700 .723 .500 .827 .768 .853 .926 City Council/RSA Agenda 138 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
11th ST.

Right
15 Thru
25 Left
1 Out In Total
42 41 83
Right
4 Thru
377
Left
22 Out Total In
264 403 667
Left
27 Thru
26 Right
28 Out In Total
90 81 171
Left
12 Thru
235
Right
43 Total Out In
419 290 709
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 139 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 15:00
15:00 0 2 0 2 3 36 0 39 7 8 5 20 0 35 4 39 100
15:15 0 4 3 7 5 50 1 56 5 8 8 21 0 28 2 30 114
15:30 0 2 3 5 2 60 1 63 8 6 7 21 2 71 5 78 167
15:45 0 4 1 5 3 44 3 50 4 7 5 16 6 89 9 104 175
Total Volume 0 12 7 19 13 190 5 208 24 29 25 78 8 223 20 251 556 % App. Total 0 63.2 36.8 6.2 91.3 2.4 30.8 37.2 32.1 3.2 88.8 8 PHF .000 .750 .583 .679 .650 .792 .417 .825 .750 .906 .781 .929 .333 .626 .556 .603 .794 City Council/RSA Agenda 140 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
11th ST.

Right
7 Thru
12 Left
0 Out In Total
42 19 61
Right
5 Thru
190
Left
13 Out Total In
248 208 456
Left
24 Thru
29 Right
25 Out In Total
45 78 123
Left
8 Thru
223
Right
20 Total Out In
221 251 472
Peak Hour Begins at 15:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 141 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:00
16:00 0 4 1 5 3 44 1 48 2 9 8 19 2 52 7 61 133
16:15 0 7 3 10 2 30 2 34 5 10 16 31 2 38 5 45 120
16:30 0 6 1 7 4 29 0 33 3 13 6 22 2 42 1 45 107
16:45 0 4 1 5 1 33 1 35 7 12 9 28 0 43 6 49 117
Total Volume 0 21 6 27 10 136 4 150 17 44 39 100 6 175 19 200 477 % App. Total 0 77.8 22.2 6.7 90.7 2.7 17 44 39 3 87.5 9.5 PHF .000 .750 .500 .675 .625 .773 .500 .781 .607 .846 .609 .806 .750 .841 .679 .820 .897 City Council/RSA Agenda 142 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
11th ST.

Right
6 Thru
21 Left
0 Out In Total
54 27 81
Right
4 Thru
136
Left
10 Out Total In
214 150 364
Left
17 Thru
44 Right
39 Out In Total
50 100 150
Left
6 Thru
175
Right
19 Total Out In
159 200 359
Peak Hour Begins at 16:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 143 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Bank 1
11th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 3
08:30 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 4
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 4 0 10 10
14:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2
15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
15:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 5 5
15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 8 8
16:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 3
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 5 5
Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 0 6 0 11 11
17:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 3
17:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 5 5
Grand Total 0 3 1 0 4 1 9 0 0 10 0 6 0 0 6 0 15 2 0 17 0 37 37 Apprch % 0 75 25 10 90 0 0 100 0 0 88.2 11.8
Total % 0 8.1 2.7 10.8 2.7 24.3 0 27 0 16.2 0 16.2 0 40.5 5.4 45.9 0 100 City Council/RSA Agenda 144 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
08:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 3
08:30 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 10
% App. Total 0 100 0 50 50 0 0 100 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .250 .000 .500 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .500 .000 .500 .625 City Council/RSA Agenda 145 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
11th ST.

Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
3 1 4
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
1 Out Total In
4 2 6
Left
0 Thru
3 Right
0 Out In Total
2 3 5
Left
0 Thru
4 Right
0 Total Out In
1 4 5
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 146 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 15:00
15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
15:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
15:30 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5
15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 8
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .333 .000 .333 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .375 .000 .375 .400 City Council/RSA Agenda 147 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
11th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Right
0 Thru
4 Left
0 Out Total In
3 4 7
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
0 1 1
Left
0 Thru
3 Right
0 Total Out In
4 3 7
Peak Hour Begins at 15:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 148 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:00
16:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5
Total Volume 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 4 2 6 11
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 66.7 33.3
PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .500 .250 .750 .550 City Council/RSA Agenda 149 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-003 11th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
11th ST.

Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
1 1 2
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out Total In
4 3 7
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
3 1 4
Left
0 Thru
4 Right
2 Total Out In
3 6 9
Peak Hour Begins at 16:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 150 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
12th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 21 0 1 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 13 3 35 38 07:15 1 0 0 1 1 1 32 0 2 33 0 0 1 0 1 0 22 1 4 23 7 58 65 07:30 5 0 1 0 6 0 87 2 11 89 3 3 0 0 6 0 57 0 5 57 16 158 174 07:45 2 0 0 0 2 0 104 2 6 106 3 0 0 0 3 0 59 2 0 61 6 172 178 Total 8 1 1 1 10 1 244 4 20 249 6 3 1 0 10 0 151 3 11 154 32 423 455 08:00 6 1 1 0 8 0 94 3 7 97 0 0 1 0 1 1 62 1 6 64 13 170 183 08:15 2 0 1 0 3 1 114 2 29 117 0 1 0 0 1 1 77 1 2 79 31 200 231 08:30 2 2 0 1 4 1 115 0 22 116 1 0 0 0 1 1 86 1 3 88 26 209 235 08:45 2 0 0 0 2 0 51 2 6 53 2 0 0 0 2 2 19 0 3 21 9 78 87 Total 12 3 2 1 17 2 374 7 64 383 3 1 1 0 5 5 244 3 14 252 79 657 736 14:00 2 1 1 2 4 1 28 5 1 34 0 0 2 0 2 0 34 3 5 37 8 77 85 14:15 1 0 1 3 2 0 26 1 0 27 1 0 1 0 2 0 27 2 14 29 17 60 77 14:30 0 1 2 2 3 0 28 0 2 28 0 0 1 1 1 3 41 1 11 45 16 77 93 14:45 3 2 0 0 5 0 23 1 0 24 1 0 1 0 2 1 31 1 7 33 7 64 71 Total 6 4 4 7 14 1 105 7 3 113 2 0 5 1 7 4 133 7 37 144 48 278 326 15:00 2 0 0 0 2 0 40 2 1 42 1 0 0 1 1 2 33 0 0 35 2 80 82 15:15 3 0 2 0 5 0 47 1 2 48 1 4 1 0 6 0 25 3 1 28 3 87 90 15:30 5 0 2 0 7 1 62 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 3 78 1 65 82 65 152 217 15:45 6 1 0 0 7 2 46 0 8 48 1 3 1 1 5 1 90 1 62 92 71 152 223 Total 16 1 4 0 21 3 195 3 11 201 3 7 2 2 12 6 226 5 128 237 141 471 612 16:00 2 2 0 4 4 0 47 1 0 48 0 0 1 3 1 1 53 0 3 54 10 107 117 16:15 2 3 1 1 6 1 33 2 0 36 0 0 3 7 3 0 41 0 0 41 8 86 94 16:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 28 1 0 29 1 1 0 3 2 0 49 0 0 49 4 80 84 16:45 0 1 1 2 2 0 41 2 0 43 0 0 1 1 1 2 46 0 0 48 3 94 97 Total 4 6 2 8 12 1 149 6 0 156 1 1 5 14 7 3 189 0 3 192 25 367 392 17:00 1 2 0 3 3 1 36 1 0 38 1 1 0 7 2 0 44 2 1 46 11 89 100 17:15 0 0 0 1 0 1 31 2 1 34 1 2 2 1 5 0 39 1 1 40 4 79 83 17:30 1 0 2 0 3 1 38 0 0 39 1 2 0 6 3 0 39 1 0 40 6 85 91 17:45 1 0 1 7 2 1 27 1 0 29 0 2 0 3 2 0 40 1 4 41 14 74 88 Total 3 2 3 11 8 4 132 4 1 140 3 7 2 17 12 0 162 5 6 167 35 327 362 Grand Total 49 17 16 28 82 12 1199 31 99 1242 18 19 16 34 53 18 1105 23 199 1146 360 2523 2883 Apprch % 59.8 20.7 19.5 1 96.5 2.5 34 35.8 30.2 1.6 96.4 2 Total % 1.9 0.7 0.6 3.3 0.5 47.5 1.2 49.2 0.7 0.8 0.6 2.1 0.7 43.8 0.9 45.4 12.5 87.5 City Council/RSA Agenda 151 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 2 0 0 2 0 104 2 106 3 0 0 3 0 59 2 61 172
08:00 6 1 1 8 0 94 3 97 0 0 1 1 1 62 1 64 170
08:15 2 0 1 3 1 114 2 117 0 1 0 1 1 77 1 79 200
08:30 2 2 0 4 1 115 0 116 1 0 0 1 1 86 1 88 209
Total Volume 12 3 2 17 2 427 7 436 4 1 1 6 3 284 5 292 751 % App. Total 70.6 17.6 11.8 0.5 97.9 1.6 66.7 16.7 16.7 1 97.3 1.7 PHF .500 .375 .500 .531 .500 .928 .583 .932 .333 .250 .250 .500 .750 .826 .625 .830 .898 City Council/RSA Agenda 152 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
12th ST.

Right
2 Thru
3 Left
12 Out In Total
11 17 28
Right
7 Thru
427
Left
2 Out Total In
297 436 733
Left
4 Thru
1 Right
1 Out In Total
10 6 16
Left
3 Thru
284
Right
5 Total Out In
433 292 725
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 153 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 15:00
15:00 2 0 0 2 0 40 2 42 1 0 0 1 2 33 0 35 80
15:15 3 0 2 5 0 47 1 48 1 4 1 6 0 25 3 28 87
15:30 5 0 2 7 1 62 0 63 0 0 0 0 3 78 1 82 152
15:45 6 1 0 7 2 46 0 48 1 3 1 5 1 90 1 92 152
Total Volume 16 1 4 21 3 195 3 201 3 7 2 12 6 226 5 237 471 % App. Total 76.2 4.8 19 1.5 97 1.5 25 58.3 16.7 2.5 95.4 2.1 PHF .667 .250 .500 .750 .375 .786 .375 .798 .750 .438 .500 .500 .500 .628 .417 .644 .775 City Council/RSA Agenda 154 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
12th ST.

Right
4 Thru
1 Left
16 Out In Total
16 21 37
Right
3 Thru
195
Left
3 Out Total In
244 201 445
Left
3 Thru
7 Right
2 Out In Total
9 12 21
Left
6 Thru
226
Right
5 Total Out In
202 237 439
Peak Hour Begins at 15:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 155 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:00
16:00 2 2 0 4 0 47 1 48 0 0 1 1 1 53 0 54 107
16:15 2 3 1 6 1 33 2 36 0 0 3 3 0 41 0 41 86
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 28 1 29 1 1 0 2 0 49 0 49 80
16:45 0 1 1 2 0 41 2 43 0 0 1 1 2 46 0 48 94
Total Volume 4 6 2 12 1 149 6 156 1 1 5 7 3 189 0 192 367 % App. Total 33.3 50 16.7 0.6 95.5 3.8 14.3 14.3 71.4 1.6 98.4 0 PHF .500 .500 .500 .500 .250 .793 .750 .813 .250 .250 .417 .583 .375 .892 .000 .889 .857 City Council/RSA Agenda 156 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
12th ST.

Right
2 Thru
6 Left
4 Out In Total
10 12 22
Right
6 Thru
149
Left
1 Out Total In
198 156 354
Left
1 Thru
1 Right
5 Out In Total
7 7 14
Left
3 Thru
189
Right
0 Total Out In
152 192 344
Peak Hour Begins at 16:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 157 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Bank 1
12th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:00 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
08:15 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 3
08:30 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Total 3 1 2 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 8 8
14:15 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 3
Total 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 3
15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
15:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 5 5
15:45 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2
Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 9 9
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 4
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 0 8 8
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Grand Total 4 3 2 0 9 0 7 2 0 9 0 1 1 0 2 0 10 1 0 11 0 31 31 Apprch % 44.4 33.3 22.2 0 77.8 22.2 0 50 50 0 90.9 9.1
Total % 12.9 9.7 6.5 29 0 22.6 6.5 29 0 3.2 3.2 6.5 0 32.3 3.2 35.5 0 100 City Council/RSA Agenda 158 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:00 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:15 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
08:30 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total Volume 3 1 2 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8
% App. Total 50 16.7 33.3 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .375 .250 .500 .750 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .667 City Council/RSA Agenda 159 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
12th ST.

Right
2 Thru
1 Left
3 Out In Total
0 6 6
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out Total In
4 1 5
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Total Out In
3 1 4
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 160 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 15:00
15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
15:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
15:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5
15:45 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
Total Volume 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 9
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .500 .250 .333 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .450 City Council/RSA Agenda 161 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
2 1 3
Right
2 Thru
2 Left
0 Out Total In
4 4 8
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Left
0 Thru
4 Right
0 Total Out In
2 4 6
Peak Hour Begins at 15:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 162 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
H ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
H ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:00
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 5 8
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .625 .000 .625 .500 City Council/RSA Agenda 163 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-004 12th-H
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

H ST.

H ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
2 Left
0 Out Total In
6 2 8
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
1 Out In Total
0 1 1
Left
0 Thru
5 Right
0 Total Out In
2 5 7
Peak Hour Begins at 16:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 164 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
11th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 0 8 0 0 8 1 0 0 2 1 1 7 0 0 8 0 1 1 0 2 2 19 21
07:15 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 1 13 0 0 2 3 2 4 31 35 07:30 1 20 0 2 21 2 1 3 3 6 2 18 2 1 22 0 2 3 0 5 6 54 60 07:45 0 23 0 0 23 7 4 1 1 12 4 26 1 1 31 0 1 0 2 1 4 67 71 Total 1 67 0 2 68 10 5 4 6 19 8 63 3 3 74 0 4 6 5 10 16 171 187 08:00 1 29 1 0 31 2 0 2 0 4 1 17 3 0 21 0 0 1 0 1 0 57 57 08:15 0 11 0 0 11 2 1 0 0 3 4 14 3 0 21 0 0 1 0 1 0 36 36 08:30 1 17 0 2 18 1 0 0 0 1 3 15 2 1 20 0 0 0 2 0 5 39 44 08:45 0 7 0 1 7 0 0 1 1 1 2 10 3 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 26 Total 2 64 1 3 67 5 1 3 1 9 10 56 11 2 77 0 0 2 2 2 8 155 163 14:00 3 10 0 0 13 1 1 2 1 4 8 18 0 5 26 1 4 4 2 9 8 52 60 14:15 3 10 0 0 13 2 2 1 1 5 3 12 5 3 20 0 2 1 4 3 8 41 49 14:30 1 11 1 0 13 1 0 0 0 1 2 11 4 3 17 0 1 1 1 2 4 33 37 14:45 0 6 0 2 6 4 1 1 1 6 2 15 0 4 17 0 0 3 0 3 7 32 39 Total 7 37 1 2 45 8 4 4 3 16 15 56 9 15 80 1 7 9 7 17 27 158 185 15:00 0 10 0 9 10 2 1 1 2 4 5 20 0 13 25 0 0 3 0 3 24 42 66 15:15 0 11 0 1 11 2 3 0 5 5 3 22 3 3 28 0 1 1 2 2 11 46 57 15:30 2 7 0 6 9 1 0 0 3 1 6 23 1 9 30 0 3 4 4 7 22 47 69 15:45 0 19 0 1 19 1 2 0 0 3 4 15 1 5 20 0 1 5 0 6 6 48 54 Total 2 47 0 17 49 6 6 1 10 13 18 80 5 30 103 0 5 13 6 18 63 183 246 16:00 0 9 2 10 11 2 4 2 1 8 3 18 1 2 22 0 0 1 0 1 13 42 55 16:15 1 8 1 3 10 1 1 3 7 5 5 29 3 4 37 0 0 3 2 3 16 55 71 16:30 0 9 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 3 3 19 3 5 25 1 2 2 5 5 10 42 52 16:45 0 10 0 0 10 2 1 0 3 3 3 24 5 3 32 1 1 1 0 3 6 48 54 Total 1 36 3 13 40 5 9 5 11 19 14 90 12 14 116 2 3 7 7 12 45 187 232 17:00 1 12 0 2 13 1 1 1 2 3 8 19 5 1 32 1 2 1 1 4 6 52 58 17:15 2 10 2 1 14 1 4 0 1 5 3 23 7 1 33 0 1 0 0 1 3 53 56 17:30 1 13 2 0 16 2 2 1 0 5 5 30 3 3 38 0 3 4 0 7 3 66 69 17:45 1 11 0 2 12 2 4 0 3 6 6 23 2 5 31 1 4 1 0 6 10 55 65 Total 5 46 4 5 55 6 11 2 6 19 22 95 17 10 134 2 10 6 1 18 22 226 248 Grand Total 18 297 9 42 324 40 36 19 37 95 87 440 57 74 584 5 29 43 28 77 181 1080 1261 Apprch % 5.6 91.7 2.8 42.1 37.9 20 14.9 75.3 9.8 6.5 37.7 55.8 Total % 1.7 27.5 0.8 30 3.7 3.3 1.8 8.8 8.1 40.7 5.3 54.1 0.5 2.7 4 7.1 14.4 85.6 City Council/RSA Agenda 165 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
07:30 1 20 0 21 2 1 3 6 2 18 2 22 0 2 3 5 54
07:45 0 23 0 23 7 4 1 12 4 26 1 31 0 1 0 1 67
08:00 1 29 1 31 2 0 2 4 1 17 3 21 0 0 1 1 57
08:15 0 11 0 11 2 1 0 3 4 14 3 21 0 0 1 1 36
Total Volume 2 83 1 86 13 6 6 25 11 75 9 95 0 3 5 8 214 % App. Total 2.3 96.5 1.2 52 24 24 11.6 78.9 9.5 0 37.5 62.5 PHF .500 .716 .250 .694 .464 .375 .500 .521 .688 .721 .750 .766 .000 .375 .417 .400 .799 City Council/RSA Agenda 166 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
11th ST.

Right
1 Thru
83 Left
2 Out In Total
81 86 167
Right
6 Thru
6 Left
13 Out Total In
14 25 39
Left
11 Thru
75 Right
9 Out In Total
101 95 196
Left
0 Thru
3 Right
5 Total Out In
18 8 26
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 167 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 15:00
15:00 0 10 0 10 2 1 1 4 5 20 0 25 0 0 3 3 42
15:15 0 11 0 11 2 3 0 5 3 22 3 28 0 1 1 2 46
15:30 2 7 0 9 1 0 0 1 6 23 1 30 0 3 4 7 47
15:45 0 19 0 19 1 2 0 3 4 15 1 20 0 1 5 6 48
Total Volume 2 47 0 49 6 6 1 13 18 80 5 103 0 5 13 18 183 % App. Total 4.1 95.9 0 46.2 46.2 7.7 17.5 77.7 4.9 0 27.8 72.2 PHF .250 .618 .000 .645 .750 .500 .250 .650 .750 .870 .417 .858 .000 .417 .650 .643 .953 City Council/RSA Agenda 168 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
11th ST.

Right
0 Thru
47 Left
2 Out In Total
81 49 130
Right
1 Thru
6 Left
6 Out Total In
12 13 25
Left
18 Thru
80 Right
5 Out In Total
66 103 169
Left
0 Thru
5 Right
13 Total Out In
24 18 42
Peak Hour Begins at 15:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 169 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 1 12 0 13 1 1 1 3 8 19 5 32 1 2 1 4 52
17:15 2 10 2 14 1 4 0 5 3 23 7 33 0 1 0 1 53
17:30 1 13 2 16 2 2 1 5 5 30 3 38 0 3 4 7 66
17:45 1 11 0 12 2 4 0 6 6 23 2 31 1 4 1 6 55
Total Volume 5 46 4 55 6 11 2 19 22 95 17 134 2 10 6 18 226 % App. Total 9.1 83.6 7.3 31.6 57.9 10.5 16.4 70.9 12.7 11.1 55.6 33.3 PHF .625 .885 .500 .859 .750 .688 .500 .792 .688 .792 .607 .882 .500 .625 .375 .643 .856 City Council/RSA Agenda 170 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
11th ST.

Right
4 Thru
46 Left
5 Out In Total
99 55 154
Right
2 Thru
11 Left
6 Out Total In
32 19 51
Left
22 Thru
95 Right
17 Out In Total
58 134 192
Left
2 Thru
10 Right
6 Total Out In
37 18 55
Peak Hour Begins at 17:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 171 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Bank 1
11th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
08:30 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6
14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 3
14:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 6
15:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2
15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 3
16:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
16:45 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Total 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 4
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 4
Grand Total 2 3 0 0 5 0 6 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 1 5 0 0 6 0 23 23 Apprch % 40 60 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 16.7 83.3 0
Total % 8.7 13 0 21.7 0 26.1 0 26.1 0 26.1 0 26.1 4.3 21.7 0 26.1 0 100 City Council/RSA Agenda 172 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:30 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 6
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 City Council/RSA Agenda 173 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
11th ST.

Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
4 1 5
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out Total In
0 1 1
Left
0 Thru
4 Right
0 Out In Total
1 4 5
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
1 0 1
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 174 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 14:00
14:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
14:15 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total Volume 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .500 City Council/RSA Agenda 175 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
11th ST.

Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
0 1 1
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out Total In
2 3 5
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Left
0 Thru
2 Right
0 Total Out In
3 2 5
Peak Hour Begins at 14:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 176 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
11th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:00
16:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16:45 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4
% App. Total 66.7 33.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
PHF .250 .250 .000 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .500 City Council/RSA Agenda 177 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-005 11th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
11th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
11th ST.

Right
0 Thru
1 Left
2 Out In Total
1 3 4
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
2 0 2
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 1 1
Peak Hour Begins at 16:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 178 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
12th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 5
07:15 1 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 4 6 10
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 4 2 7 9
07:45 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 3 0 9 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 10 16
Total 3 0 0 3 3 0 9 6 0 15 1 0 0 7 1 1 7 0 3 8 13 27 40 08:00 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 5 3 8
08:15 0 0 2 3 2 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 10
08:30 2 0 1 5 3 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 7 14
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4
Total 4 0 3 9 7 0 7 3 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 2 2 17 19 36 14:00 4 0 2 7 6 0 10 0 1 10 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 6 5 17 21 38 14:15 0 0 1 5 1 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 4 7 10 17
14:30 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 6 10
14:45 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 3 3 4 0 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 0 3 7 10 17
Total 6 0 6 12 12 0 17 5 4 22 0 0 0 13 0 2 11 0 6 13 35 47 82 15:00 0 0 0 9 0 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 3 0 0 3 16 8 24
15:15 1 0 0 5 1 0 4 2 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 1 11 8 19
15:30 1 0 1 4 2 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 4 7 14 15 29
15:45 1 1 1 3 3 0 3 2 0 5 0 2 0 6 2 0 5 0 0 5 9 15 24
Total 3 1 2 21 6 0 17 5 0 22 0 2 0 25 2 0 16 0 4 16 50 46 96 16:00 0 0 1 5 1 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 9 7 16
16:15 1 1 1 2 3 0 6 1 0 7 0 0 0 12 0 1 4 0 0 5 14 15 29 16:30 0 0 1 1 1 0 6 1 0 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 10 14
16:45 1 0 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 4 1 10 11
Total 2 1 4 8 7 1 19 3 0 23 0 0 0 20 0 1 11 0 0 12 28 42 70 17:00 1 0 3 2 4 1 7 1 0 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 3 6 16 22
17:15 1 0 1 1 2 0 7 1 0 8 0 1 0 4 1 3 2 0 1 5 6 16 22
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 2 9 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 1 0 6 6 15 21
17:45 1 0 1 0 2 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 1 4 3 13 16
Total 3 0 5 3 8 1 27 5 2 33 0 1 0 13 1 4 13 1 3 18 21 60 81 Grand Total 21 2 20 56 43 2 96 27 6 125 1 3 0 84 4 10 58 1 18 69 164 241 405 Apprch % 48.8 4.7 46.5 1.6 76.8 21.6 25 75 0 14.5 84.1 1.4 Total % 8.7 0.8 8.3 17.8 0.8 39.8 11.2 51.9 0.4 1.2 0 1.7 4.1 24.1 0.4 28.6 40.5 59.5 City Council/RSA Agenda 179 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00
07:00 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4
07:15 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 6
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 7
07:45 1 0 0 1 0 6 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Total Volume 3 0 0 3 0 9 6 15 1 0 0 1 1 7 0 8 27
% App. Total 100 0 0 0 60 40 100 0 0 12.5 87.5 0
PHF .750 .000 .000 .750 .000 .375 .500 .417 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .438 .000 .500 .675 City Council/RSA Agenda 180 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
3 Out In Total
7 3 10
Right
6 Thru
9 Left
0 Out Total In
10 15 25
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 1 1
Left
1 Thru
7 Right
0 Total Out In
10 8 18
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 181 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 14:00
14:00 4 0 2 6 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 21
14:15 0 0 1 1 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 10
14:30 1 0 1 2 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6
14:45 1 0 2 3 0 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 10
Total Volume 6 0 6 12 0 17 5 22 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 13 47
% App. Total 50 0 50 0 77.3 22.7 0 0 0 15.4 84.6 0
PHF .375 .000 .750 .500 .000 .425 .417 .550 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .550 .000 .650 .560 City Council/RSA Agenda 182 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
12th ST.

Right
6 Thru
0 Left
6 Out In Total
7 12 19
Right
5 Thru
17 Left
0 Out Total In
17 22 39
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
2 Thru
11 Right
0 Total Out In
23 13 36
Peak Hour Begins at 14:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 183 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 1 0 3 4 1 7 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 16
17:15 1 0 1 2 0 7 1 8 0 1 0 1 3 2 0 5 16
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 6 15
17:45 1 0 1 2 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 13
Total Volume 3 0 5 8 1 27 5 33 0 1 0 1 4 13 1 18 60
% App. Total 37.5 0 62.5 3 81.8 15.2 0 100 0 22.2 72.2 5.6 PHF .750 .000 .417 .500 .250 .964 .417 .917 .000 .250 .000 .250 .333 .650 .250 .750 .938 City Council/RSA Agenda 184 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
12th ST.

Right
5 Thru
0 Left
3 Out In Total
10 8 18
Right
5 Thru
27 Left
1 Out Total In
16 33 49
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
2 1 3
Left
4 Thru
13 Right
1 Total Out In
32 18 50
Peak Hour Begins at 17:00
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 185 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 1

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
Groups Printed- Bank 1
12th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
14:00 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
14:15 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7
15:15 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
15:45 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
Grand Total 3 5 0 0 8 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 19 Apprch % 37.5 62.5 0 33.3 66.7 0 12.5 0 87.5 0 0 0
Total % 15.8 26.3 0 42.1 5.3 10.5 0 15.8 5.3 0 36.8 42.1 0 0 0 0 0 100 City Council/RSA Agenda 186 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 2

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
08:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 City Council/RSA Agenda 187 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 3

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
0 1 1
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
1 Out Total In
1 1 2
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
1 Out In Total
2 1 3
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 188 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 4

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 14:00 to 15:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 14:00
14:00 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
14:15 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3
14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 7
% App. Total 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
PHF .250 .333 .000 .417 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .583 City Council/RSA Agenda 189 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 5

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
4 Left
1 Out In Total
0 5 5
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
3 0 3
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
2 Out In Total
4 2 6
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 14:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 190 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 6

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

Southbound
I ST.

Westbound
12th ST.

Northbound
I ST.

Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 4
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 33.3 0 66.7 0 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .000 .500 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 City Council/RSA Agenda 191 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
All Traffic Data
(916) 771-8700
File Name : 11-7107-006 12th-I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2011
Page No : 7

CITY OF UNION CITY
BIKES ON BANK 1
12th ST.

I ST.

I ST.
12th ST.

Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out Total In
2 1 3
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
2 Out In Total
0 3 3
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
2 0 2
Peak Hour Begins at 17:00
Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
City Council/RSA Agenda 192 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Volumes for: Thursday, March 17, 2011 City: Union City Project #: 11-7108-001 Location: F Street between 11th Street and 12th Street (near R.R. crossing) Start
Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 15 2 12
12:15 1 15 5 18
12:30 1 12 1 12
12:45 1 14 5 56 0 21 8 63 13 119
1:00 1 9 1 15
1:15 0 14 3 17
1:30 0 12 0 21
1:45 0 13 1 48 0 18 4 71 5 119
2:00 3 28 2 43
2:15 0 38 0 21
2:30 0 29 0 20
2:45 2 22 5 117 1 20 3 104 8 221
3:00 0 20 1 12
3:15 1 9 1 24
3:30 0 16 1 19
3:45 2 71 3 116 1 37 4 92 7 208
4:00 3 32 1 31
4:15 3 23 1 16
4:30 3 24 1 16
4:45 3 18 12 97 1 12 4 75 16 172
5:00 2 19 0 18
5:15 5 12 1 13
5:30 2 21 2 14
5:45 4 33 13 85 2 20 5 65 18 150
6:00 8 13 2 19
6:15 5 8 5 22
6:30 5 16 3 13
6:45 11 30 29 67 3 18 13 72 42 139
7:00 12 20 8 15
7:15 11 13 12 12
7:30 18 25 17 19
7:45 30 6 71 64 60 12 97 58 168 122
8:00 55 13 90 17
8:15 58 7 36 8
8:30 43 3 54 13
8:45 40 6 196 29 57 7 237 45 433 74
9:00 15 9 12 10
9:15 9 6 11 19
9:30 12 4 10 9
9:45 10 8 46 27 5 7 38 45 84 72
10:00 12 9 11 4
10:15 8 8 5 4
10:30 8 2 6 5
10:45 6 6 34 25 14 2 36 15 70 40
11:00 9 2 8 2
11:15 15 2 3 2
11:30 5 4 14 4
11:45 16 3 45 11 23 8 48 16 93 27
Total 460 742 460 742 497 721 497 721 957 1463
Combined
Total
AM Peak 8:00 AM 7:45 AM
Vol. 196 240
P.H.F. 0.845 0.667
PM Peak 3:45 PM 3:15 PM
Vol. 150 111
P.H.F. 0.528 0.750
Percentage 38.3% 61.7% 40.8% 59.2%
Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals 1202 1202 1218 1218 2420
City Council/RSA Agenda 193 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Volumes for: Thursday, March 17, 2011 City: Union City Project #: 11-7108-002 Location: H Street between 11th Street and 12th Street (near R.R. crossing) Start
Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 5 38 3 28
12:15 5 23 4 32
12:30 1 28 1 20
12:45 1 30 12 119 3 18 11 98 23 217
1:00 1 21 3 19
1:15 1 25 1 20
1:30 0 19 1 34
1:45 1 36 3 101 1 18 6 91 9 192
2:00 0 36 1 41
2:15 1 39 0 32
2:30 1 32 0 31
2:45 0 43 2 150 0 28 1 132 3 282
3:00 0 42 0 34
3:15 1 32 1 45
3:30 1 33 0 59
3:45 3 94 5 201 2 52 3 190 8 391
4:00 0 86 0 49
4:15 2 60 1 38
4:30 2 42 2 35
4:45 2 47 6 235 4 33 7 155 13 390
5:00 5 48 2 40
5:15 2 43 4 36
5:30 2 45 1 31
5:45 5 39 14 175 4 36 11 143 25 318
6:00 4 40 7 31
6:15 4 40 3 30
6:30 3 35 2 24
6:45 5 37 16 152 11 27 23 112 39 264
7:00 6 46 17 26
7:15 16 32 25 29
7:30 32 39 68 27
7:45 75 35 129 152 123 31 233 113 362 265
8:00 55 28 120 23
8:15 76 16 97 27
8:30 81 17 127 17
8:45 82 21 294 82 58 16 402 83 696 165
9:00 24 16 22 25
9:15 27 17 23 26
9:30 14 17 22 20
9:45 23 20 88 70 18 9 85 80 173 150
10:00 21 10 18 14
10:15 19 6 17 10
10:30 19 7 15 5
10:45 17 6 76 29 26 1 76 30 152 59
11:00 20 8 19 6
11:15 20 4 22 4
11:30 23 5 35 5
11:45 30 3 93 20 42 3 118 18 211 38
Total 738 1486 738 1486 976 1245 976 1245 1714 2731
Combined
Total
AM Peak 8:00 AM 7:45 AM
Vol. 294 467
P.H.F. 0.896 0.919
PM Peak 3:45 PM 3:15 PM
Vol. 282 205
P.H.F. 0.750 0.869
Percentage 33.2% 66.8% 43.9% 56.1%
Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals 2224 2224 2221 2221 4445
City Council/RSA Agenda 194 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Volumes for: Thursday, March 17, 2011 City: Union City Project #: 11-7108-003 Location: I Street between 11th Street and 12th Street (near R.R. crossing) Start
Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 5 0 3
12:15 0 4 0 5
12:30 0 4 4 10
12:45 1 4 1 17 0 5 4 23 5 40
1:00 1 3 2 4
1:15 0 1 2 0
1:30 0 3 0 11
1:45 1 2 2 9 0 3 4 18 6 27
2:00 1 4 0 4
2:15 0 1 0 5
2:30 0 10 0 10
2:45 0 6 1 21 0 7 0 26 1 47
3:00 0 7 0 8
3:15 0 4 0 6
3:30 0 1 0 2
3:45 0 4 0 16 0 7 0 23 0 39
4:00 0 3 1 3
4:15 0 4 0 7
4:30 0 6 0 3
4:45 0 5 0 18 0 6 1 19 1 37
5:00 0 3 0 7
5:15 0 4 0 9
5:30 0 2 0 6
5:45 0 7 0 16 0 5 0 27 0 43
6:00 1 2 0 11
6:15 1 5 1 6
6:30 1 5 2 9
6:45 1 3 4 15 0 6 3 32 7 47
7:00 0 6 1 10
7:15 0 1 1 6
7:30 3 7 3 8
7:45 4 4 7 18 6 12 11 36 18 54
8:00 3 2 4 3
8:15 0 2 4 5
8:30 4 4 4 7
8:45 1 6 8 14 3 3 15 18 23 32
9:00 2 0 4 4
9:15 1 2 8 6
9:30 1 1 3 3
9:45 0 1 4 4 1 5 16 18 20 22
10:00 2 3 4 2
10:15 3 1 1 3
10:30 1 0 2 3
10:45 2 0 8 4 1 2 8 10 16 14
11:00 4 2 3 2
11:15 2 1 3 2
11:30 1 0 5 1
11:45 1 0 8 3 3 3 14 8 22 11
Total 43 155 43 155 76 258 76 258 119 413
Combined
Total
AM Peak 11:45 AM 11:45 AM
Vol. 14 21
P.H.F. 0.700 0.525
PM Peak 2:30 PM 7:00 PM
Vol. 27 36
P.H.F. 0.675 0.750
Percentage 21.7% 78.3% 22.8% 77.2%
Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals 198 198 334 334 532
City Council/RSA Agenda 195 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants

Appendix C – SWITRS and FRA Collision Data
City Council/RSA Agenda 196 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 197 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 198 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 199 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATK

UP
116191

XXX
749780A 06/28/10 07:15 AM
Amtrak [ATK ]
Union Pacific RR Co. [UP ]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code HAYWARD PAC ALAMEDA 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) UNION CITY 12. Highway Name or No. ; H ST Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) E

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
2 0
Code
3 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
2 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code
4 1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous materials released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 75

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code
1 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
4 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
79 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated E 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
2 01 03 06

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 3

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code
2 1. Male

2. Female 27

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 4

41. Driver Code
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3,000 0
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew) 86

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
2 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
TRAIN 524 OPERATING WITH CAB CAR 8304 IN THE LEAD, 3 CARS AND LOCOMOTIVE E/141 IN THE REAR STRUCK A VAN AT MP26.4, H STREET CROSSING.

A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
City Council/RSA Agenda 200 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATK

UP
104132

XXX
749779F 04/13/07 06:54 AM
Amtrak [ATK ]
Union Pacific RR Co. [UP ]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code HAYWARD PAC ALAMEDA 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) UNION CITY 12. Highway Name or No. CITY ; E ST Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
1 0
Code
4 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
2 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 63

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code
1 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

SINGLE MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
3 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
79 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated R 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
2 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
2 01 02 03 06

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 2

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 3 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 4

41. Driver Code
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
3 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,000 0
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew) 29

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
TRAIN NO.#521 OPERATING WITH LOCOMOTIVE E/2012 AND 5 CARS STRUCK A VEHICLE AT MP26.20, E STREET CROSSING.

A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
City Council/RSA Agenda 201 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATK

UP
093589

XXX
749780A 08/16/04 07:55 AM
Amtrak [ATK ]
Union Pacific RR Co. [UP ]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code HAYWARD, PAC ALAMEDA 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) UNION CITY 12. Highway Name or No. CITY ; H ST Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) K

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
1 Code
3 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 70

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code
1 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
NO.# 1

27. FRA Track
Class
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
4 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
78 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated R 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
2 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
2 01 06 07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 3

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 3 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code
1 1. Male

2. Female
44 40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)

41. Driver Code
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $0 1
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew) 23

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
TRAIN NO.#523 OPERATING WITH LOCOMOTIVE 2002 AND 4 CARS STRUCK A PEDESTRIAN AT MP26.40, H STREET CROSSING.

A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
City Council/RSA Agenda 202 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants

Appendix D – Level of Service Worksheets: Existing
City Council/RSA Agenda 203 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am Existing - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 21 164 6 1 174 2 21 22 7 2 27 45
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Hourly flow rate (vph) 27 208 8 1 220 3 27 28 9 3 34 57 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 223 215 563 490 211 511 492 222
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 223 215 563 490 211 511 492 222
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 100 93 94 99 99 93 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 1346 1355 378 469 829 440 468 818
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 242 224 63 94
Volume Left 27 1 27 3
Volume Right 8 3 9 57
cSH 1346 1355 451 631
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.15
Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 12 13
Control Delay (s) 1.0 0.1 14.3 11.7
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 1.0 0.1 14.3 11.7
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 204 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am Existing - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 158 2 9 235 3 40
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76
Hourly flow rate (vph) 208 3 12 309 4 53
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 211 542 209
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 211 542 209
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 99 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 1360 497 831
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 211 321 57
Volume Left 0 12 4
Volume Right 3 0 53
cSH 1700 1360 794
Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.01 0.07
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 6
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 9.9
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 9.9
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 205 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am Existing - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 12 235 43 22 377 4 27 26 28 1 25 15
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 253 46 24 405 4 29 28 30 1 27 16 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 410 299 786 759 276 801 780 408
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 410 299 786 759 276 801 780 408
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 98 89 91 96 100 92 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1149 1262 276 326 763 266 317 644
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 312 433 87 44
Volume Left 13 24 29 1
Volume Right 46 4 30 16
cSH 1149 1262 378 387
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.02 0.23 0.11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 1 22 10
Control Delay (s) 0.4 0.6 17.3 15.5
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.4 0.6 17.3 15.5
Approach LOS C C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 206 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am Existing - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 3 284 5 2 427 7 4 1 1 12 3 2
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 316 6 2 474 8 4 1 1 13 3 2
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 482 321 812 812 318 809 811 478
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 482 321 812 812 318 809 811 478
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 98 100 100 96 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1080 1239 293 312 722 296 312 587
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 324 484 7 19
Volume Left 3 2 4 13
Volume Right 6812
cSH 1080 1239 329 318
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0025
Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 16.2 17.0
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 16.2 17.0
Approach LOS C C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 207 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am Existing - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 0 3 5 13 6 6 11 75 9 2 83 1
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 4 6 16 8 8 14 94 11 2 104 1
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 15 10 104 54 7 109 54 11
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 15 10 104 54 7 109 54 11
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 98 89 99 100 87 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1603 1610 785 828 1076 780 829 1070 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 10 31 119 108
Volume Left 0 16 14 2
Volume Right 6 8 11 1
cSH 1603 1610 841 830
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.14 0.13
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 12 11
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.8 10.0 10.0
Lane LOS A A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.8 10.0 10.0
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 8.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 208 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am Existing - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 170096100300
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 10 0 0 13 9100400
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 22 10 31 36 10 31 31 18
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 22 10 31 36 10 31 31 18
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1593 1609 976 856 1071 976 861 1061 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 12 22 1 4
Volume Left 1014
Volume Right 0900
cSH 1593 1609 976 976
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0000
Control Delay (s) 0.9 0.0 8.7 8.7
Lane LOS A A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.9 0.0 8.7 8.7
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 209 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 Existing - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 17 101 4 5 80 1 6 18 10 2 12 26
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 Hourly flow rate (vph) 27 163 6 8 129 2 10 29 16 3 19 42 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 131 169 419 368 166 398 370 130
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 131 169 419 368 166 398 370 130
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 99 98 95 98 99 96 95
cM capacity (veh/h) 1455 1408 497 547 878 520 546 920
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 197 139 55 65
Volume Left 27 8 10 3
Volume Right 6 2 16 42
cSH 1455 1408 603 739
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.01 0.09 0.09
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1077
Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.5 11.6 10.3
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 1.2 0.5 11.6 10.3
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 210 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 Existing - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 91 0 8 107 5 30
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57
Hourly flow rate (vph) 160 0 14 188 9 53
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 160 375 160
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 160 375 160
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 99 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 1420 620 886
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 160 202 61
Volume Left 0 14 9
Volume Right 0 0 53
cSH 1700 1420 834
Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.01 0.07
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 6
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 9.7
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 9.7
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 211 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 Existing - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 8 223 20 13 190 5 24 29 25 0 12 7
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 282 25 16 241 6 30 37 32 0 15 9 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 247 308 608 595 295 642 604 244
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 247 308 608 595 295 642 604 244
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 99 92 91 96 100 96 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1319 1253 385 409 744 340 404 795
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 318 263 99 24
Volume Left 10 16 30 0
Volume Right 25 6 32 9
cSH 1319 1253 468 493
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 1 20 4
Control Delay (s) 0.3 0.6 14.7 12.7
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.3 0.6 14.7 12.7
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 212 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 Existing - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 6 226 5 3 195 3 3 7 2 16 1 4
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Hourly flow rate (vph) 8 294 6 4 253 4 4 9 3 21 1 5
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 257 300 581 577 297 582 579 255
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 257 300 581 577 297 582 579 255
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 99 98 100 95 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1308 1261 418 423 743 413 423 783
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 308 261 16 27
Volume Left 8 4 4 21
Volume Right 6435
cSH 1308 1261 455 454
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0035
Control Delay (s) 0.3 0.1 13.2 13.4
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.3 0.1 13.2 13.4
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 213 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 Existing - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 0 5 13 6 6 1 18 80 5 2 47 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 5 14 6 6 1 19 84 5 2 49 0
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 7 19 56 32 12 79 38 7
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 7 19 56 32 12 79 38 7
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 98 90 100 100 94 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1613 1598 896 857 1068 835 850 1076 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 19 14 108 52
Volume Left 0 6 19 2
Volume Right 14 1 5 0
cSH 1613 1598 872 850
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 11 5
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.4 9.7 9.5
Lane LOS A A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.4 9.7 9.5
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 8.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 214 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 Existing - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 2 11 0 0 17 5000606
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 20 0 0 30 9 0 0 0 11 0 11
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 39 20 72 66 20 62 62 35
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 39 20 72 66 20 62 62 35
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1571 1597 908 823 1058 932 827 1038 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 23 39 0 21
Volume Left 4 0 0 11
Volume Right 0 9 0 11
cSH 1571 1597 1700 982
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0002
Control Delay (s) 1.1 0.0 0.0 8.7
Lane LOS A A A
Approach Delay (s) 1.1 0.0 0.0 8.7
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 215 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/8/2011 Existing - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 7 71 3 3 43 2 10 30 10 0 33 12
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 93 4 4 57 3 13 39 13 0 43 16
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 59 97 217 181 95 212 182 58
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 59 97 217 181 95 212 182 58
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 98 94 99 100 94 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1545 1496 689 707 961 698 706 1008
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 107 63 66 59
Volume Left 9 4 13 0
Volume Right 4 3 13 16
cSH 1545 1496 742 768
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.08
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0076
Control Delay (s) 0.7 0.5 10.3 10.1
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.7 0.5 10.3 10.1
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 216 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/8/2011 Existing - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 71 2 6 59 0 14
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78
Hourly flow rate (vph) 91 3 8 76 0 18
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 94 183 92
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 94 183 92
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1501 802 965
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 94 83 18
Volume Left 0 8 0
Volume Right 3 0 18
cSH 1700 1501 965
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.01 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 8.8
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 8.8
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 217 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/8/2011 Existing - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 6 175 19 10 136 4 17 44 39 0 21 6
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 194 21 11 151 4 19 49 43 0 23 7 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 156 216 412 396 205 462 404 153
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 156 216 412 396 205 462 404 153
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 96 91 95 100 96 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1425 1354 522 534 836 446 528 893
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 222 167 111 30
Volume Left 7 11 19 0
Volume Right 21 4 43 7
cSH 1425 1354 619 581
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.18 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 16 4
Control Delay (s) 0.3 0.6 12.1 11.5
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.3 0.6 12.1 11.5
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 218 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/8/2011 Existing - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 3 189 0 1 149 6115462
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 210 0 1 166 7116472
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 172 210 393 391 210 394 388 169
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 172 210 393 391 210 394 388 169
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1405 1361 558 543 830 560 545 875
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 213 173 8 13
Volume Left 3114
Volume Right 0762
cSH 1405 1361 725 587
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0012
Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 10.0 11.3
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 10.0 11.3
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 219 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/8/2011 Existing - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 2 10 6 6 11 2 22 95 17 5 46 4
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 12 7 7 13 2 26 110 20 6 53 5
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 15 19 79 49 15 123 51 14
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 15 19 79 49 15 123 51 14
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 97 87 98 99 94 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1603 1598 857 838 1064 748 835 1066 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 21 22 156 64
Volume Left 2 7 26 6
Volume Right 7 2 20 5
cSH 1603 1598 864 840
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.08
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 16 6
Control Delay (s) 0.8 2.3 10.1 9.6
Lane LOS AABA
Approach Delay (s) 0.8 2.3 10.1 9.6
Approach LOS B A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 8.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 220 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/21/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/8/2011 Existing - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 4 13 1 1 27 5010305
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 14 1 1 29 5010305
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 34 15 62 59 14 57 57 31
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 34 15 62 59 14 57 57 31
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1577 1603 926 829 1065 937 831 1043 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 19 35 1 9
Volume Left 4103
Volume Right 1505
cSH 1577 1603 829 1000
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0001
Control Delay (s) 1.6 0.2 9.3 8.6
Lane LOS AAAA
Approach Delay (s) 1.6 0.2 9.3 8.6
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 221 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants

Appendix E – LOS Worksheets: Existing + ‘F’ Street Closure City Council/RSA Agenda 222 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 F-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 88 2 22 7 2 72
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 96 2 24 8 2 78
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 193 0 212 192
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 193 0 212 192
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 94 96 99 100 88
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 660 1085 687 661
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 32 80
Volume Left 0 2
Volume Right 8 0
cSH 729 662
Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 10
Control Delay (s) 10.2 11.2
Lane LOS B B
Approach Delay (s) 10.2 11.2
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 223 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 F-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 108 331 43 22 464 4 38 26 28 1 25 158
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 117 360 47 24 504 4 41 28 30 1 27 172 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 509 407 1358 1174 383 1217 1196 507 vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 509 407 1358 1174 383 1217 1196 507
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 89 98 40 83 95 99 83 70
cM capacity (veh/h) 1056 1152 69 167 664 118 162 566
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 524 533 100 200
Volume Left 117 24 41 1
Volume Right 47 4 30 172
cSH 1056 1152 123 416
Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.02 0.81 0.48
Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 2 121 63
Control Delay (s) 3.0 0.6 103.9 21.4
Lane LOS A A F C
Approach Delay (s) 3.0 0.6 103.9 21.4
Approach LOS F C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 12.2
Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 224 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 F-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 3 363 5 2 549 129 4 1 1 131 3 2
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 395 5 2 597 140 4 1 1 142 3 2
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 737 400 1079 1145 397 1077 1078 667 vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 737 400 1079 1145 397 1077 1078 667
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 98 99 100 27 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 869 1159 192 198 652 195 218 459
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 403 739 7 148
Volume Left 3 2 4 142
Volume Right 5 140 1 2
cSH 869 1159 219 197
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.75
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 125
Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 21.9 63.8
Lane LOS A A C F
Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 21.9 63.8
Approach LOS C F
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 7.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 225 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 F-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 0 3 5 13 6 6 11 75 9 2 83 1
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 3 5 14 7 7 12 82 10 2 90 1
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 13 9 90 47 6 95 47 10
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 13 9 90 47 6 95 47 10
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 99 90 99 100 89 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1605 1611 814 837 1077 809 837 1072 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 9 27 103 93
Volume Left 0 14 12 2
Volume Right 5 7 10 1
cSH 1605 1611 852 839
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 10 9
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.8 9.8 9.8
Lane LOS A A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.8 9.8 9.8
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 8.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 226 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 F-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 170096100300
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 8 0 0 10 7 1 0 0 3 0 0
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 16 8 23 26 8 23 23 13
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 16 8 23 26 8 23 23 13
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1601 1613 989 867 1075 989 870 1067 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 9 16 1 3
Volume Left 1013
Volume Right 0700
cSH 1601 1613 989 989
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0000
Control Delay (s) 0.9 0.0 8.6 8.7
Lane LOS A A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.9 0.0 8.6 8.7
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 227 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 45 1 18 10 2 38
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 49 1 20 11 2 41
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 99 0 119 98
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 99 0 119 98
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 97 97 99 100 95
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 767 1085 812 768
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 30 43
Volume Left 0 2
Volume Right 11 0
cSH 857 770
Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 4
Control Delay (s) 9.4 10.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 9.4 10.0
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 228 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 69 284 20 13 230 5 27 29 25 0 12 76
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 75 309 22 14 250 5 29 32 27 0 13 83 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 255 330 840 753 320 793 761 253
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 255 330 840 753 320 793 761 253
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 94 99 87 90 96 100 96 89
cM capacity (veh/h) 1310 1229 234 316 721 258 312 786
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 405 270 88 96
Volume Left 75 14 29 0
Volume Right 22 5 27 83
cSH 1310 1229 335 651
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.01 0.26 0.15
Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 1 26 13
Control Delay (s) 1.9 0.5 19.5 11.5
Lane LOS A A C B
Approach Delay (s) 1.9 0.5 19.5 11.5
Approach LOS C B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 229 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 6 272 5 3 253 61 3 7 2 92 1 4
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 296 5 3 275 66 3 8 2 100 1 4
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 341 301 631 659 298 632 629 308
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 341 301 631 659 298 632 629 308
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 99 98 100 74 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1218 1260 388 380 741 383 396 732
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 308 345 13 105
Volume Left 7 3 3 100
Volume Right 5 66 2 4
cSH 1218 1260 416 391
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.27
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 27
Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.1 13.9 17.6
Lane LOS A A B C
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.1 13.9 17.6
Approach LOS B C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 230 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 0 5 13 6 6 1 18 80 5 2 47 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 5 14 7 7 1 20 87 5 2 51 0
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 8 20 58 33 12 82 40 7
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 8 20 58 33 12 82 40 7
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 98 90 99 100 94 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1613 1597 892 856 1068 829 849 1075 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 20 14 112 53
Volume Left 0 7 20 2
Volume Right 14 1 5 0
cSH 1613 1597 871 848
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 11 5
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.4 9.7 9.5
Lane LOS A A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.4 9.7 9.5
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 8.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 231 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 2:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 2 11 0 0 17 5000606
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 12 0 0 18 5000707
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 24 12 44 40 12 38 38 21
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 24 12 44 40 12 38 38 21
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1591 1607 951 851 1069 967 854 1056 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 14 24 0 13
Volume Left 2007
Volume Right 0507
cSH 1591 1607 1700 1009
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0001
Control Delay (s) 1.1 0.0 0.0 8.6
Lane LOS A A A
Approach Delay (s) 1.1 0.0 0.0 8.6
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 232 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 25 2 30 10 0 45
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 27 2 33 11 0 49
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 57 0 83 55
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 57 0 83 55
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 98 96 99 100 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 821 1085 857 822
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 43 49
Volume Left 0 0
Volume Right 11 0
cSH 874 822
Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 5
Control Delay (s) 9.3 9.7
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 9.3 9.7
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 233 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 47 216 19 10 158 4 22 44 39 0 21 45
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 51 235 21 11 172 4 24 48 42 0 23 49 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 176 255 603 545 245 609 553 174
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 176 255 603 545 245 609 553 174
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 96 99 93 89 95 100 95 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 1400 1310 359 426 794 340 421 870
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 307 187 114 72
Volume Left 51 11 24 0
Volume Right 21 4 42 49
cSH 1400 1310 491 650
Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.01 0.23 0.11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 1 22 9
Control Delay (s) 1.6 0.5 14.5 11.2
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 1.6 0.5 14.5 11.2
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 234 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 3 225 0 1 182 39 1 1 5 54 6 2
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 245 0 1 198 42 1 1 5 59 7 2
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 240 245 478 493 245 478 472 219
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 240 245 478 493 245 478 472 219
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 99 88 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1326 1322 490 475 794 492 488 821
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 248 241 8 67
Volume Left 3 1 1 59
Volume Right 0 42 5 2
cSH 1326 1322 671 498
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.14
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 12
Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 10.4 13.4
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 10.4 13.4
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 235 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 2 10 6 6 11 2 22 95 17 5 46 4
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 11 7 7 12 2 24 103 18 5 50 4
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 14 17 74 46 14 115 48 13
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 14 17 74 46 14 115 48 13
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 97 88 98 99 94 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1604 1600 868 841 1066 764 839 1067 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 20 21 146 60
Volume Left 2 7 24 5
Volume Right 7 2 18 4
cSH 1604 1600 869 845
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.07
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 15 6
Control Delay (s) 0.8 2.3 10.0 9.6
Lane LOS AAAA
Approach Delay (s) 0.8 2.3 10.0 9.6
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 8.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 236 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 F-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 4 13 1 1 27 5010305
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 14 1 1 29 5010305
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 35 15 63 60 15 58 58 32
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 35 15 63 60 15 58 58 32
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1577 1603 924 828 1065 935 830 1042 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 20 36 1 9
Volume Left 4103
Volume Right 1505
cSH 1577 1603 828 999
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0001
Control Delay (s) 1.6 0.2 9.4 8.6
Lane LOS AAAA
Approach Delay (s) 1.6 0.2 9.4 8.6
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 237 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants

Appendix F – LOS Worksheets: Existing + ‘H’ Street Closure City Council/RSA Agenda 238 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 21 309 6 1 174 2 210 22 7 2 27 45
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 23 336 7 1 189 2 228 24 8 2 29 49 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 191 342 641 578 339 597 580 190
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 191 342 641 578 339 597 580 190
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 100 33 94 99 99 93 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 1382 1217 341 419 703 387 418 852
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 365 192 260 80
Volume Left 23 1 228 2
Volume Right 7 2 8 49
cSH 1382 1217 353 604
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.74 0.13
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 141 11
Control Delay (s) 0.6 0.1 39.0 11.9
Lane LOS AAEB
Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.1 39.0 11.9
Approach LOS E B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 12.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 239 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 158 2 9 453 3 194
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 172 2 10 492 3 211
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 174 685 173
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 174 685 173
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 99 76
cM capacity (veh/h) 1403 411 871
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 174 502 214
Volume Left 0 10 3
Volume Right 2 0 211
cSH 1700 1403 856
Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.01 0.25
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 25
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 10.6
Lane LOS A B
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 10.6
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 240 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 216 193 26 28 1 40
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 235 210 28 30 1 43
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 679 0 619 574
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 679 0 619 574
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 86 91 97 100 88
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 319 1085 324 367
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 59 45
Volume Left 0 1
Volume Right 30 0
cSH 504 366
Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 10
Control Delay (s) 13.1 16.2
Lane LOS B C
Approach Delay (s) 13.1 16.2
Approach LOS B C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 241 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 145 147 4132
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 158 160 4132
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 399 395 475 0
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 399 395 475 0
tC, single (s) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 90 99 100 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 516 489 441 1085
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 5 5
Volume Left 4 0
Volume Right 0 2
cSH 510 578
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 1
Control Delay (s) 12.1 11.3
Lane LOS B B
Approach Delay (s) 12.1 11.3
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 242 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 0 148 5 13 6 6 25 75 9 191 83 203
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 161 5 14 7 7 27 82 10 208 90 221 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 13 166 467 205 164 252 204 10
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 13 166 467 205 164 252 204 10
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 92 88 99 67 87 79
cM capacity (veh/h) 1605 1412 358 685 881 625 685 1072
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 166 27 118 518
Volume Left 0 14 27 208
Volume Right 5 7 10 221
cSH 1605 1412 575 774
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.67
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 19 131
Control Delay (s) 0.0 4.0 12.9 18.5
Lane LOS A B C
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 4.0 12.9 18.5
Approach LOS B C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 243 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 1 7 0 0 227 6 1 0 0 146 0 15
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 8 0 0 247 7 1 0 0 159 0 16
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 253 8 276 263 8 260 260 250
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 253 8 276 263 8 260 260 250
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 77 100 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1312 1613 662 642 1075 693 644 789
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 9 253 1 175
Volume Left 1 0 1 159
Volume Right 0 7 0 16
cSH 1312 1613 662 701
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 25
Control Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 10.4 11.8
Lane LOS A B B
Approach Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 10.4 11.8
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 244 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 17 227 4 5 80 1 101 18 10 2 12 26
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 247 4 5 87 1 110 20 11 2 13 28 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 88 251 419 385 249 405 386 88
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 88 251 419 385 249 405 386 88
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 79 96 99 100 98 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1508 1314 512 540 790 527 539 971
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 270 93 140 43
Volume Left 18 5 110 2
Volume Right 4 1 11 28
cSH 1508 1314 531 757
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.26 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 26 5
Control Delay (s) 0.6 0.5 14.2 10.0
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.5 14.2 10.0
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 245 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 91 0 8 208 5 159
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 99 0 9 226 5 173
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 99 342 99
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 99 342 99
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 99 82
cM capacity (veh/h) 1494 650 957
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 99 235 178
Volume Left 0 9 5
Volume Right 0 0 173
cSH 1700 1494 943
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.01 0.19
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 17
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 9.7
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 9.7
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 246 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 101 100 29 25 0 19
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 110 109 32 27 0 21
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 328 0 317 274
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 328 0 317 274
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 93 94 97 100 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 551 1085 562 590
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 59 21
Volume Left 0 0
Volume Right 27 0
cSH 713 590
Volume to Capacity 0.08 0.03
Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 3
Control Delay (s) 10.5 11.3
Lane LOS B B
Approach Delay (s) 10.5 11.3
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 247 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 119 118 3714
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 129 128 3814
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 328 323 387 0
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 328 323 387 0
tC, single (s) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 92 99 99 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 584 547 504 1085
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 11 5
Volume Left 3 0
Volume Right 0 4
cSH 558 882
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0
Control Delay (s) 11.6 9.1
Lane LOS B A
Approach Delay (s) 11.6 9.1
Approach LOS B A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 248 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 0 131 13 6 6 1 30 80 5 97 47 107
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 142 14 7 7 1 33 87 5 105 51 116 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 8 157 311 170 149 218 177 7
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 8 157 311 170 149 218 177 7
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 94 88 99 84 93 89
cM capacity (veh/h) 1613 1423 539 720 897 663 714 1075
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 157 14 125 273
Volume Left 0 7 33 105
Volume Right 14 1 5 116
cSH 1613 1423 667 805
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.34
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 17 38
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.5 11.6 11.7
Lane LOS A B B
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.5 11.6 11.7
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 8.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 249 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 H-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 2 11 0 0 118 5 0 0 0 121 12 7
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 12 0 0 128 5 0 0 0 132 13 8
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 134 12 161 150 12 147 147 131
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 134 12 161 150 12 147 147 131
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 84 98 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1451 1607 786 740 1069 820 743 919
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 14 134 0 152
Volume Left 2 0 0 132
Volume Right 0508
cSH 1451 1607 1700 817
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 17
Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.0 0.0 10.4
Lane LOS A A B
Approach Delay (s) 1.2 0.0 0.0 10.4
Approach LOS A B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 5.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 250 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 H-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 7 171 3 3 43 2 78 30 10 0 33 12
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 8 186 3 3 47 2 85 33 11 0 36 13
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 49 189 288 258 188 284 259 48
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 49 189 288 258 188 284 259 48
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 86 95 99 100 94 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1558 1385 624 641 855 630 641 1021
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 197 52 128 49
Volume Left 8 3 85 0
Volume Right 3 2 11 13
cSH 1558 1385 643 712
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.07
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 18 6
Control Delay (s) 0.3 0.5 12.0 10.4
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.3 0.5 12.0 10.4
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 5.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 251 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 H-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 71 2 6 137 0 113
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 77 2 7 149 0 123
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 79 240 78
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 79 240 78
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 87
cM capacity (veh/h) 1519 745 982
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 79 155 123
Volume Left 0 7 0
Volume Right 2 0 123
cSH 1700 1519 982
Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.00 0.13
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 11
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 9.2
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 9.2
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 252 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 H-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 76 72 44 39 0 27
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 83 78 48 42 0 29
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 243 0 271 204
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 243 0 271 204
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 95 92 96 100 96
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 625 1085 593 657
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 90 29
Volume Left 0 0
Volume Right 42 0
cSH 780 657
Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.04
Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 4
Control Delay (s) 10.2 10.7
Lane LOS B B
Approach Delay (s) 10.2 10.7
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 253 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 H-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 98 95 1162
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 107 103 1172
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 270 265 316 0
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 270 265 316 0
tC, single (s) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 93 100 100 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 641 599 560 1085
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 2 9
Volume Left 1 0
Volume Right 0 2
cSH 619 637
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1
Control Delay (s) 10.8 10.7
Lane LOS B B
Approach Delay (s) 10.8 10.7
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 254 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 H-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 0 110 6 6 11 2 31 95 17 73 46 81
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 120 7 7 12 2 34 103 18 79 50 88 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 14 126 262 150 123 219 152 13
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 14 126 262 150 123 219 152 13
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 94 86 98 88 93 92
cM capacity (veh/h) 1604 1460 599 738 928 643 736 1067
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 126 21 155 217
Volume Left 0 7 34 79
Volume Right 7 2 18 88
cSH 1604 1460 719 794
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.27
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 20 28
Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.4 11.4 11.2
Lane LOS A B B
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 2.4 11.4 11.2
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 8.2
Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 255 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 H-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 4 13 1 1 105 5 0 1 0 103 21 6
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 14 1 1 114 5 0 1 0 112 23 7
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 120 15 160 145 15 143 143 117
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 120 15 160 145 15 143 143 117
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 86 97 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1468 1603 779 743 1065 823 746 935
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 20 121 1 141
Volume Left 4 1 0 112
Volume Right 1507
cSH 1468 1603 743 814
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 16
Control Delay (s) 1.7 0.1 9.8 10.3
Lane LOS AAAB
Approach Delay (s) 1.7 0.1 9.8 10.3
Approach LOS A B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 5.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 256 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
TJKM
Transportation
Consultants

Appendix G – LOS Worksheets: Existing + ‘I’ Street Closure City Council/RSA Agenda 257 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 21 164 6 1 174 2 21 22 7 2 27 45
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 23 178 7 1 189 2 23 24 8 2 29 49 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 191 185 483 421 182 439 423 190
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 191 185 483 421 182 439 423 190
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 100 95 95 99 100 94 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 1382 1390 439 515 861 498 514 852
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 208 192 54 80
Volume Left 23 1 23 2
Volume Right 7 2 8 49
cSH 1382 1390 507 676
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.11 0.12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 9 10
Control Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 13.0 11.0
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 13.0 11.0
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 258 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 158 2 9 250 3 40
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 172 2 10 272 3 43
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 174 464 173
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 174 464 173
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 99 95
cM capacity (veh/h) 1403 552 871
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 174 282 47
Volume Left 0 10 3
Volume Right 2 0 43
cSH 1700 1403 837
Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.01 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 4
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 9.6
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 9.6
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 259 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 12 243 43 22 377 4 45 26 28 1 25 15
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 264 47 24 410 4 49 28 30 1 27 16 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 414 311 803 776 288 818 797 412
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 414 311 803 776 288 818 797 412
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 98 82 91 96 100 91 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1145 1250 268 319 752 258 310 640
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 324 438 108 45
Volume Left 13 24 49 1
Volume Right 47 4 30 16
cSH 1145 1250 345 380
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.02 0.31 0.12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 1 33 10
Control Delay (s) 0.4 0.6 20.1 15.7
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.4 0.6 20.1 15.7
Approach LOS C C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 260 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 3 284 5 2 427 7 4 1 11 12 3 2
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 309 5 2 464 8 4 1 12 13 3 2
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 472 314 794 794 311 803 793 468
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 472 314 794 794 311 803 793 468
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 99 100 98 96 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1090 1246 301 319 729 295 320 595
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 317 474 17 18
Volume Left 3 2 4 13
Volume Right 5 8 12 2
cSH 1090 1246 508 318
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0035
Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 12.3 17.0
Lane LOS A A B C
Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 12.3 17.0
Approach LOS B C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 261 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 13 12 86 9 2 83
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 13 93 10 2 90
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 41 0 91 35
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 41 0 91 35
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 99 89 99 100 89
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 843 1085 804 850
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 103 92
Volume Left 0 2
Volume Right 10 0
cSH 861 849
Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 9
Control Delay (s) 9.7 9.8
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 9.7 9.8
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 262 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - AM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 801000
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 901000
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 17 17 17 0
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 17 17 17 0
tC, single (s) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 993 872 872 1085
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 1 0
Volume Left 1 0
Volume Right 0 0
cSH 993 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0
Control Delay (s) 8.6 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 8.6 0.0
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 263 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 17 101 4 5 80 1 6 18 10 2 12 26
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 110 4 5 87 1 7 20 11 2 13 28
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 88 114 282 248 112 268 249 88
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 88 114 282 248 112 268 249 88
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 99 97 99 100 98 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1508 1475 633 644 941 653 643 971
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 133 93 37 43
Volume Left 18 5 7 2
Volume Right 4 1 11 28
cSH 1508 1475 708 825
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1044
Control Delay (s) 1.1 0.5 10.4 9.6
Lane LOS AABA
Approach Delay (s) 1.1 0.5 10.4 9.6
Approach LOS B A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.2
Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 264 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 91 0 8 129 5 30
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 99 0 9 140 5 33
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 99 257 99
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 99 257 99
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 99 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1494 728 957
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 99 149 38
Volume Left 0 9 5
Volume Right 0 0 33
cSH 1700 1494 916
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.01 0.04
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 9.1
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 9.1
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 265 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 8 241 20 13 190 5 48 29 25 0 12 7
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 262 22 14 207 5 52 32 27 0 13 8 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 212 284 542 530 273 571 539 209
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 212 284 542 530 273 571 539 209
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 99 88 93 96 100 97 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1358 1279 431 446 766 389 442 831
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 292 226 111 21
Volume Left 9 14 52 0
Volume Right 22 5 27 8
cSH 1358 1279 488 534
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.04
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 22 3
Control Delay (s) 0.3 0.6 14.5 12.0
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.3 0.6 14.5 12.0
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.2
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 266 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 6 226 5 3 195 3 3 7 19 16 1 4
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 246 5 3 212 3 3 8 21 17 1 4
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 215 251 486 483 248 506 484 214
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 215 251 486 483 248 506 484 214
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 99 98 97 96 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1355 1314 485 480 790 456 479 826
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 258 218 32 23
Volume Left 7 3 3 17
Volume Right 5 3 21 4
cSH 1355 1314 647 500
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0044
Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.1 10.8 12.5
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.1 10.8 12.5
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 267 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 6 7 98 5 2 47
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 8 107 5 2 51
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 21 0 76 17
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 21 0 76 17
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 100 88 99 100 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 870 1085 822 874
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 112 53
Volume Left 0 2
Volume Right 5 0
cSH 878 871
Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 5
Control Delay (s) 9.7 9.4
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 9.7 9.4
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 268 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 8:00 am 4/12/2011 I-Closed - MD Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 13 00006
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 00007
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 35 28 28 0
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 35 28 28 0
tC, single (s) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 100 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 959 857 857 1085
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 0 7
Volume Left 0 0
Volume Right 0 7
cSH 1700 1085
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0
Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.3
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 8.3
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 269 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: F Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 I-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 7 71 3 3 43 2 10 30 10 0 33 12
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 8 77 3 3 47 2 11 33 11 0 36 13
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 49 80 179 149 79 176 150 48
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 49 80 179 149 79 176 150 48
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 99 96 99 100 95 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1558 1517 740 737 982 748 736 1021
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 88 52 54 49
Volume Left 8 3 11 0
Volume Right 3 2 11 13
cSH 1558 1517 776 796
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0065
Control Delay (s) 0.7 0.5 10.0 9.8
Lane LOS AAAA
Approach Delay (s) 0.7 0.5 10.0 9.8
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 270 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: F Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 I-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 71 2 6 92 0 14
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 77 2 7 100 0 15
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 79 191 78
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 79 191 78
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1519 794 982
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 79 107 15
Volume Left 0 7 0
Volume Right 2 0 15
cSH 1700 1519 982
Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.00 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 8.7
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 8.7
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 271 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: H Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 I-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 6 193 19 10 136 4 54 44 39 0 21 6
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 210 21 11 148 4 59 48 42 0 23 7 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 152 230 423 407 220 471 415 150
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 152 230 423 407 220 471 415 150
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 89 91 95 100 96 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1429 1337 514 527 820 439 521 896
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 237 163 149 29
Volume Left 7 11 59 0
Volume Right 21 4 42 7
cSH 1429 1337 580 575
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.26 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 25 4
Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.6 13.3 11.6
Lane LOS AABB
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.6 13.3 11.6
Approach LOS B B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 272 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4: H Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 I-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 3 189 0 1 149 6 1 1 21 4 6 2
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 205 0 1 162 7 1 1 23 4 7 2
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 168 205 385 383 205 403 379 165
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 168 205 385 383 205 403 379 165
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 97 99 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1409 1366 566 549 835 541 551 879
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 209 170 25 13
Volume Left 3114
Volume Right 0 7 23 2
cSH 1409 1366 800 584
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0022
Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 9.6 11.3
Lane LOS AAAB
Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 9.6 11.3
Approach LOS A B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 273 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: I Street & 11th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 I-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 6 13 117 17 5 46
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 14 127 18 5 50
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 27 0 102 20
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 27 0 102 20
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0
p0 queue free % 100 85 98 99 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 862 1085 764 870
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 146 55
Volume Left 0 5
Volume Right 18 0
cSH 886 858
Volume to Capacity 0.16 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 5
Control Delay (s) 9.9 9.5
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 9.9 9.5
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 274 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: I Street & 12th Street 4/22/2011
Railroad Crossing Study 5:00 pm 4/12/2011 I-Closed - PM Peak Synchro 7 - Report JB Page 6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h) 17 10105
Sign Control Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 10105
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 0 43 38 38 0
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 0 43 38 38 0
tC, single (s) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 100 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1623 947 845 844 1085
Direction, Lane # NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 1 5
Volume Left 0 0
Volume Right 0 5
cSH 845 1085
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0
Control Delay (s) 9.3 8.3
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 9.3 8.3
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Err
Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
City Council/RSA Agenda 275 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
1 Attachment 2: Locations of the UP At-Grade Crossing Improvements on the Oakland, Niles and Coast Subdivisions
43 City Council/RSA Agenda 276 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 April
2016
City of U
Propos
Pedest
Crossin
 Proj
Pede
 % Pl
 City:
 State
 Stre
Pede
 Mile
 Subd
 DOT
 Lat/
Union City
sal to In
trian At
ng
ect Type: New
estrian Crossi
ans: 10%
: City of Unio
e: California
et: Union City
estrian Acces
epost: 27.10
division: Oak
T#: No DOT#,
/Long: 37˚35’2
y, Californ
nstall Ne
t-Grade
w At-grade P
ing
n City
y BART Statio
s
land
proposed cro
28”N; 122˚01
Revised 4/21
nia
ew
ublic
on
ossing
1’02”W
1/2016
City Council/RSA Agenda 277 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 City Letter Describing Project Scope for New and Existing At-grade Crossings
 Table A – 2012 CTC Report Status
 Exhibit AI, Conceptual Layout of new BART Pedestrian Crossing  Exhibit A2, Conceptual Section (Profile) of new BART Pedestrian Crossing
 Exhibit B, Conceptual layout of improvements for the crossing closure at "I" Street, MP 26.70.
 Exhibit C, Conceptual layout of improvements at Decoto Road, MP 26.90.  Exhibit D, Aerial Plan Showing Overall Area of Project Crossings.  Preliminary Engineering (PE) Authorization Letter from City to UPRR. (Signed by UPRR on 12/1/2015)
 UPRR Road Crossing Application Form
 Exhibits AI, A2, B, C, D - on larger sheets for ease of review (attached to hard copies only)
City Council/RSA Agenda 278 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Mr. Kevi
Manager
Union Pa
9451 Atk
Roseville
Subject:

Dear Mr.

Per our m
conferen
outlining
Union Ci
the City o
City prop
provide d
Developm
proposal
traffic tha
As part o

1. C
ad
co
in Yoder
r Industry an
acific Railro
kinson Street
e, CA 95474
Propo
Union
Street
grade
existin
impro

25.60 Smith
. Yoder,
most recent s
ce call on M
g the steps in
ity BART st
of Union Cit
poses to con
direct access
ment (TOD)
will shorten
at now uses
of this applic
Construct an
djacent to th
onceptual pl

nd Public Pro
ad
t
4 osed at-grad
n City BAR
t, MP 26.70
e crossing at
ng Niles Sub
ovements to
: Proposed
h Street MP
site meeting
March 4, and
n the applicat
ation over th
ty (City) her
struct a pede
s/entrance to
) located on t
n the existing
the public cr
cation, the Ci
at-grade ped
he Union City
lan and secti
ojects
de Public Pe
T Station; P
; Proposed
t Decoto Ro
b. At grade
o existing Ni
improveme
P 25.50
held Februa
per your e-m
tion process
he Union Pac
reby submits
estrian/ADA
Union City
the east (RR
g circuitous r
rossing at D
ity wishes to
destrian cros
y BART Sta
on of the pro
edestrian C
Proposed cl
improveme
oad, MP 26.2
crossing at
iles Sub at g
ents to existi
ary 23, 2016
mails dated b
for the prop
cific Railroa
s the attached
A pathway –
BART Stati
R north) side
route for mo
ecoto Road,
o do the follo
ssing on the O
ation. Please
oposed cross
rossing, MP
osure of the
ents to the e
20; Propose
t Decoto Roa
grade crossi
ing Coast Su
at the City C
both July 28
posed pedest
ad (UPRR) O
d public cro
on the UPRR
ion for the T
of Union Ci
ost of the ped
, MP 26.90.
owing:

Oakland Sub
e see Exhibit
sing.

April
P 27.10 Oak
e existing cr
existing Oak
ed improvem
ad MP 26.6
ing Whipple
ub at grade
Corporation
, 2015 and A
trian at-grade
Oakland Sub
ssing applica
R Oakland -
Transit Orien
ity BART St
destrian, bicy

bdivision, M
ts A1 and A
l 21, 2016
kland Sub.,
rossing at “I
kland Sub. A
ments to
60; Proposed
e Road MP
e crossing at
Yard,
August 28, 2
e crossing at
b at MP 27.1
ation packag
-Subdivision
nted
tation. Thi
ycle, and AD
MP 27.10,
A2 showing th
I”
Atd
t
015,
t the
0,
ge.
n to
is
DA
he
City Council/RSA Agenda 279 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

2. Close the existing public at-grade pedestrian and vehicular crossing at “I” Street, MP

26.70, approximately 0.4 miles north (RR west) of the proposed pedestrian crossing.

Please see Exhibit B, the proposed closure and related changes to the existing “I” Street crossing, MP 26.70.

3. Upgrade foot-paths (sidewalks) at the existing Decoto Road (MP 26.20) including reconstructing existing sidewalks to provide the shortest distance crossing at the rail track as shown in Exhibit C. This is a result of our site visit with you on August 19, 2015.

4. In accordance with the Campbell Technology Corporation Reports dated April 2012, the City will commit to making all the immediate and short term recommendations as modified in the attached spreadsheet Table A for the following railroad at grade crossings:
a. The existing Oakland Sub. at-grade crossing at Decoto Road, MP 26.20; b. The existing Niles Sub. at grade crossing at Decoto Road MP 26.60; c. The existing Niles Sub at grade crossing Whipple Road MP 25.60:
d. The existing Coast sub. at grade crossing at Smith Street MP 25.50 City’s new TOD includes nearly 400 recently completed units and more than 500 units scheduled for completion in the next two years. Thus, there will be 900 new residential units and parking for 800 commuters at the parking lots located on the east side of the BART station. We estimate 80% of the residents will use BART and 100% of the commuters, or a total of 1,520 pedestrians, will be crossing the tracks at a frequency of two trips per day. Thus, the projected ADT (average daily trip) for the new signalized at-grade pedestrian crossing is 3,040.

Average Daily Vehicle Trip (ADT) counts were conducted on June 3, 2014. The ADT for “I” Street is 4349. The one-day pedestrian count is 411. This existing traffic would be diverted to either the existing H Street or Decoto Road at-grade crossings after the “I” Street at-grade crossing is eliminated. Exhibit D shows the relationship of “H” Street and Decoto Road crossings to the “I” Street crossing. The existing ADT for “H” Street is 5,755 based on counts done in 2012. The ADT for Decoto Road is 29,295 based on counts done in 2013.

The City believes the implementation of a new signalized at-grade pedestrian crossing will greatly increase the overall crossing safety in the area, improve public safety, and the usability of the BART system. The City agrees to close out the “I” Street at-grade crossing and is committed to working with UPRR in accordance with the CTC reports of April 2012 as shown in Table A for four other at grade crossings. In addition, sidewalk improvements will be made at the Decoto Road at RR crossing as shown in Exhibit C.

City Council/RSA Agenda 280 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
The City appreciates your help and guidance through our application process and we look forward to working with UPRR to build a signalized at-grade pedestrian crossing.

Sincerely,
Thomas E. ark, .E.

City Engineer
cc: "LeeAnn Di son, FRA
U.S. Rep. E.M. Swalwell, 15th District
Sia Mozaffari, CPUC
M.R. Strider, HDR
City Council/RSA Agenda 281 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Location Status Comment
DOT#834186V (1of 2) MP26.20 Immediate Increase track clearance time Completed Oakland Subdivision Short Term Modify right of way transfer time Completed Decoto Road @ 11th Street Change interconnect circuitry not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Implement Pre‐signal recommendations not done City committed to do all items that they agree with and will coordinate with Railroad staff Restrict right turn movements not done City does not agree with this recommendation intersection is more than 200 feet away from tracks.

Implement maximum preemption timing circuit not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Implement traffic signal health circuit not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Implement a Preemption O&M Completed Meet annually with railroad staff Long Term Evaluate Advance Preemption not done City does not have funds to be able to do advance preemption DOT#834186V (2of 2) MP26.20 Immediate Increase track clearance time Completed Oakland Subdivision Short Term Modify right of way transfer time Completed Decoto Road @ Station Way Change interconnect circuitry not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Restrict right turn movements not done City does not agree with this recommendation intersection is more than 200 feet away from tracks.

Implement traffic signal health circuit not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Implement a Preemption O&M Completed Meet annually with railroad staff Long Term Evaluate Advance Preemption not done City does not have funds to be able to do advance preemption DOT#749781G MP26.60 Immediate Increase track clearance time Completed Niles Subdivision Short Term Change interconnect circuitry not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Decoto Road @ 11th Street Implement Mid block recommendations not done City committed to do all items that they agree with and will coordinate with Railroad staff Restrict right turn movements not done City does not agree with this recommendation intersection is more than 200 feet away from tracks.

Implement maximum preemption timing circuit not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Implement a Preemption O&M Ccompleted Meet annually with railroad staff Long Term Implement Advance Preemption not done City does not have funds to be able to do advance preemption DOT#749776K (1of2) MP25.60 Immediate Increase track clearance time Completed Niles Subdivision Short Term Install Storage Space Signs not done City committed but needs guidance from Railroad regarding placement Whipple Road @ Railroad Change interconnect circuitry not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Implement Pre signal recommendations not done Not possible because it would eliminate left turn movement at intersection Implement maximum preemption timing circuit not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Implement a Preemption O&M Completed Meet annually with railroad staff Long Term Implement Advance Preemption not done City does not have funds to be able to do advance preemption DOT#749776K (2of2) MP25.60 Immediate Increase track clearance time Completed Niles Subdivision Short Term Install Do Not Stop on Tracks Signs Completed Whipple Road @ Ithaca Street Change interconnect circuitry not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Restrict right turn movements not done City does not agree with this recommendation intersection is more than 200 feet away from tracks.

Implement maximum preemption timing circuit not done City committed to do , will need to coordinate with Railroad staff Implement a Preemption O&M Completed Meet annually with railroad staff Long Term Implement Advance Preemption not done City does not have funds to be able to do advance preemption DOT#749927X MP25.20 Immediate Omit conflicting movements CompletedCoast Subdivision Short Term Increase track clearance time Completed Smith St. @ Tidewater Dr. Restrict right turn movements not done City does not agree with this recommendation intersection is more than 200 feet away from tracks.

TRANSIT LOOP ROAD
Preliminary Plan Prepared by ROMA Design Group and Michael Strider, HDR UNION CITY Union City, California - MP 27.10 City Council/RSA Agenda 283 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
0 10 20 40 ft Preliminary Plan Prepared by ROMA Design Group and Michael Strider, HDR Union City, California - MP 27.10 City Council/RSA Agenda 284 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

I STREET CROSSING REMOVAL
UPRR OAKLAND SUB - MP 26.70

UNION CITY, CA
1"=50'
1 1

EXHIBIT B
City Council/RSA Agenda 285 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 286 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
MP 27

UNION CITY CROSSING

IMPROVEMENTS

UPRR OAKLAND SUB
UNION CITY, CA 1"=250'
1 1

EXHIBIT D
City Council/RSA Agenda 287 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
34009 ALVARADO-NTT PSROAD
- UNION CITY, CALIFORNIA 94587
T 510.675.5305 F 510.489.9468
November 23, 2015

AGREEMENT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES
AND SUBMITTAL OF EXHIBIT "A" FOR RAILROAD APPROVAL
Crossing: Public
State: CA
City: City of Union City (City)
MP 27.10 Oakland Subdivision (new BART Ped Crossing)
MP 26.90 Oakland Subdivision (Decoto Road)
MP 26.70 Oakland Subdivision ("I" Street)
BART/Union City Pedestrian Crossing / DOT # N/A - "New Crossing" Decoto Road / DOT # 834186V
"I" Street / DOT # 834187C
Alameda County, California
Kevin A. Yoder
Manager, Industry & Public Projects
Union Pacific Railroad Company
9451 Atkinson Street
Roseville, CA 95747
Dear Mr. Yoder:

Plans are being prepared to construct a new pedestrian at-grade crossing at the location referenced above. The proposed work includes the construction of a new pedestrian at-grade crossing at the Union City BART station for improved and safe access to the adjacent development across the UPRR track from the BART station. In connection with the project, the City considers it necessary for the successful advancement of the project for your company to collaborate in the development of the project by performing the following:
• preliminary engineering and other related services
• development of cost estimates
• review of the project's preliminary layouts
• submit current train and switching moves
The City authorizes and agrees to reimburse the Railroad for its expenses and actual costs that are incurred for collaborating in the development of the project's preliminary engineering and other preliminary activities. The Railroad has estimated that these non-refundable preliminary engineering and other preliminary costs will be up to $25,000 (limit). Payment will be made within thirty (30) days from the City's receipt and approval of the Railroad's request for reimbursement. Railroad will refer to City's At-Grade Public Pedestrian Crossing, City Project Number (14-14) and forward Invoices to City Engineer, Thomas E. Ruark, P.E.

City Council/RSA Agenda 288 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Sincerely,
homas . Ru
City Engineer
City of Union City
Date
t c
/2-/- 269
7-/4/A.,S.171 ,
By /
Name and Title ////,"
Additionally, attached for your company's review and approval is the City's official letter describing the scope of work and the basis for proposing the new crossing. As a part of this letter, exhibits are included including one (1) set of half-size prints of the concept plans marked Exhibits Al & A2, which are the 10% complete plans and show the basic features of the proposed pathway project at the location referenced above. Please review and provide comment on the basic features of Exhibits Al & A2 as soon as possible. Also enclosed (as part of the letter exhibits) is one (1) set of photos of the project area.

The project may require the Railroad to incur costs for force account activities. Please prepare the railroad force account cost estimate for work activities to be provided by your company, as identified in Exhibit A and submit them at your earliest convenience so that they may be attached to the railroad generated Construction & Maintenance (C&M) agreement.

Please verify the number of current regular train (X) and switching movements (X) with a Maximum Speed of (XX) at this location as currently shown in our inventory records. This information will be used by the City's Contractor to obtain Railroad Protective Liability Insurance.

This agreement is intended to address Preliminary Engineering. It is understood by both parties that railroad may withhold its approval for any reason directly or indirectly related to safety or its operations, property issues or effect to its facilities. If the Project is approved, Union Pacific will continue to work with the City to develop Final Plans, Specifications and prepare Material and Cost Estimates for Railroad Construction Work associated with the project. It is also understood that if the project is constructed, if at all, it will be constructed at no cost to the railroad.

The City and the Railroad will enter into separate License, Right of Entry, Construction and Maintenance Agreements associated with the actual construction of the project if the project is accepted and approved by the railroad. The Agreements will be drafted by Union Pacific and forwarded to the City after the Exhibit A and cost estimates have been approved.

Please contact Thomas Ruark at telephone number (510) 675-5301 or via email at [email protected] you have any questions. Your assistance in this matter is appreciated.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
City Council/RSA Agenda 289 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Road Crossing Application Form
SECTION 1: TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL CROSSINGS
Name cirY c1c uA,10A/ - ear
Address 3 1-oo 46.0,2400
city otireAt State C4 Zip Code efl-,C-87— 441-17-
Contact Person 9/2& -
Phone (576.) 5734-6— Fax (574) 7 3/
) Individual ( ) Partnership ( ) Proprietorship Corporation: State Incorporated Names of Officers; Partners or Proprietor 77/0/k45 ZiltA t Icalf./ebV41fAlBilling Address if different than above Type of Road Crossing:

Private Farm Crossing Private Commercial Crossing
Pedestrian Overpass Pedestrian Underpass
Existing Crossing ,X New Installation
Contractor's Crossing
Other
Relocation
Permanent Use Temporary Use for Mos. Reconstruction
¿er 0/WriVCeW 447v iM ear
Crossing will be used to access g tIS AL, „Ate
Type of Vehicles To Be Driven Over Crossing:

Passenger Cars Recreational Vehicles Pickups
Farm Equipment Heavy Construction Equipment Other /Ala jr_afjC.A. - Approximate number of daily one way trips over the crossing 5ZO Name of Owner of Property to be served by crossing
Address if different than above /0 Wfteiv iJi oviat/ cirt C4 916-E37- -Act) 6e/riv7; Ale,efrAD 04":7. c4
AV4 Range
In / Near the City of DiVidA/ Gry ,
ounty Parish, State of
Crossing is Located in the:
/v4
37°36106"W /22° or I az tikv
(Example: SE 1/4 of NW 1/4Section M Township 39N,Range 12E) Section /V , Township A/9
City Council/RSA Agenda 290 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Attach a Legal Description of Your Property to be served by the crossing and a Property or County Map showing the Location of the Crossing.

INDICATE on the map the distance measured along the track between the crossing and fixed objects in the vicinity (i.e. bridge, culvert, railroad mile marker, public road) SECTION 2: TO BEAMPLETED FOR EXISTING CROSSINGS ONLY
Name(s) of previs s users of crossing
Crossing isirrently covered by license agreement number Dated with
SECTION 3: TO BE COMPLETED FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW CROSSINGS ONLY How is property currently accessed?_Z3V//Se/W.:7),crar6 er,"ib - 4744-/il? 2C. '70 Why was access to property not obtained from previous owner/2/6...--11-<beti&;-7-60(k. Fgerivi 1ece5 ,F02-7- fic7144/1/ /fr-f-/ES-C effe-V -
Desired crossing will be g 0 feet
of nearest
( ) north
(X public
2 4 south ( ) east ( ) west
( ) private road crossing.

Trac -is in -ft cu Num aukyssed Track is on: ( ) curve ()C) straight Signed Date _2 /I5 3
4- P4--ie_r 7/z/ #1-//k-,C1I7cMj
City Council/RSA Agenda 291 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

FOR RAILROAD USE ONLY

RAILROAD MILEPOST RAILROAD SUBDNISION AAR/DOT NUMBER

MGR IND & PUBLIC PROJECTS MGR TRACK MAINTENANCE MGR SIGNAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE. TELEPHONE:

SUPERINTENDENT TRANSP SVCS APPROVAL RECEIVED:

WIDTH OF

CROSSING

WIDTH OF RR RIGHT-OF-WAY CROSSING SURFACE
FLAGGING PROTECTION LOCKED GAtES REQUIRED AT
REQUIRED? RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES?
SPECIAL PROVISIONS: ESTIMATED COST
(ATTACH MATERIAL AND FORCE

ACCOUNT ESTIMATE)
WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY RAILROAD:

ANNUAL LICENSE 1-.Et. ANNUAL SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
FEE

SUBMITTED BY DATE
City Council/RSA Agenda 292 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
200032516 - 1 -
ALJ/RWH/ek4 Date of Issuance 12/4/2017
Decision 17-11-014 November 30, 2017

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of the City
of Union City for an order to install one new
Pedestrian at-grade crossing, across and
over the track of the Union Pacific Railroad
Oakland Subdivision, Mile Post 27.10, and
the closure of one existing at-grade crossing
at Mile Post 26.70, in the City of Union City,
County of Alameda, State of California.

Application 17-02-010

DECISION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF UNION CITY, TO CONSTRUCT

AN AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN RAIL CROSSING ACROSS THE UNION
PACIFIC OAKLAND SUBDIVISION, MILE POST 27.10 IN CITY OF

UNION CITY, ALAMEDA COUNTY
City Council/RSA Agenda 293 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
Table of Contents
Title Page
- i -

DECISION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF UNION CITY, TO CONSTRUCT

AN AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN RAIL CROSSING ACROSS THE UNION
PACIFIC OAKLAND SUBDIVISION, MILE POST 27.10 IN CITY OF UNION CITY, ALAMEDA COUNTY ...................................................................................... 1 Summary........................................................................................................................ 2

1. Background............................................................................................................. 2

2. Procedural Issues................................................................................................... 3

3. Jurisdiction.............................................................................................................. 4

4. Discussion............................................................................................................... 5

4.1. Seven-Factor Test for Impracticability Current Seven-Factor Test....... 9

4.1.1. Demonstration of Public Need ............................................................. 10

4.1.2. Convincing Showing that the City has Eliminated All Potential Safety Hazards......................................................................................... 10

4.1.3. Concurrence of Local Community Emergency Authorities, and the General Public. .......................................................................... 11

4.1.4. Recommendation of Staff that it Concurs with the Safety of the .......

Proposed Crossing.................................................................................. 12

4.1.5. Comparative Cost ................................................................................... 12

4.1.6. Commission Precedent .......................................................................... 13

4.1.7. Seven-Factor Standard Supports At-Grade Crossing........................ 16

4.2. Environmental Review and CEQA.......................................................... 16

5. Categorization and Need for Hearing.............................................................. 17

6. Comments on Proposed Decision ..................................................................... 17

7. Assignment of Proceeding ................................................................................. 18 Findings of Fact........................................................................................................... 18 Conclusions of Law .................................................................................................... 20 ORDER ......................................................................................................................... 21 City Council/RSA Agenda 294 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 2 -

DECISION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF UNION CITY, TO CONSTRUCT AN

AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN RAIL CROSSING ACROSS THE UNION PACIFIC OAKLAND SUBDIVISION, MILE POST 27.10 IN CITY OF UNION CITY,

ALAMEDA COUNTY
Summary
This decision grants the City of Union City authorization to construct an at-grade rail pedestrian only crossing over Union Pacific Railroad’s Oakland Subdivision at mile post 27.10 in the City of Union City, Alameda County. The new crossing will be identified as DOT Number 859611R, and California Public Utilities Commission Crossing Number 004-27.08. The decision also grants the City of Union City authorization to close the “I” Street at-grade highway rail crossing identified as DOT Number 834187C, California Public Utilities Commission Crossing Number 004-26.70.

This proceeding is closed.

1. Background
Over the last twenty years the City of Union City (the City) has been working toward creating a Transportation Oriented Development (TOD) and Intermodal Station District. The availability of an approximately 90-acre underutilized and environmentally constrained site within walking distance of the BART Station was seen as an opportunity by the City to create the Transit Oriented Development. The City has spent years cleaning up the site and installing infrastructure to create the Transit Oriented District. Single family homes and town homes were built on the former steel mill site and multi-family housing continues to be built on the remaining 30-acre parcel that has since been subdivided and fitted with public infrastructure to facilitate housing, retail and job centers.

City Council/RSA Agenda 295 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 3 -
The City’s Transit Oriented District and Intermodal Station District is approaching the completion of Phase 2A, which included modifying the circulation and ticketing elements of the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station so that pedestrians can enter the BART Station from the residential area to the east (railroad north) once the pedestrian at-grade crossing (Phase 2B) is constructed. The construction of the Pedestrian at-grade crossing under Phase 2B will culminate in establishing a direct pedestrian and bicycle connection to and from the BART station by providing a new east-side opening from the TOD area and proposed parking lot to the east of the BART Station.

The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks are currently inactive with a potential to be reactivated in the future. The projected daily number of pedestrians using the crossing is estimated at 3,040 pedestrians.

2. Procedural Issues
The City of Union City filed this application on February 27, 2017. On March 24, 2017, in Resolution ALJ 176-3394 this proceeding was preliminarily categorized as ratesetting, and it was preliminarily determined that evidentiary hearings would be necessary. On March 29, 2017, this matter was reassigned from Administrative Law Judge Richard Smith to Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Robert Haga.

A telephonic prehearing conference (PHC) was held on June 15, 2017. At the PHC the scope of the issues to be resolved and a possible procedural schedule were discussed. The City agreed that evidentiary hearings would not be necessary and that a Public Participation Hearing would not be needed. On June 29, 2017, the Safety and Enforcement Division (SED) of the Commission submitted a late-filed response and a motion to accept the late-filed response. In its response, SED stated that it does not oppose the application but wishes to City Council/RSA Agenda 296 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 4 -
apprise the Commission of relevant information on this project, including information on SED’s past site visit and the type and location of warning devices that it recommends be implemented at the crossing.

On July 24, 2017, ALJ Haga issued a ruling directing the applicant to provide copies of the Final Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) that include evaluation of the potentially significant impacts and any mitigation measures required to mitigate any such impacts for this project. On August 3, 2017, the City responded to the ruling and providing a copy of the Final EIR and a summary of the environmental impacts and mitigation measures identified for the project in the environmental reports.

This proceeding was submitted on October 13, 2017.

3. Jurisdiction
Pursuant to Section 1201 of the California Public Utilities Code (Pub. Util.

Code),1 the Commission must grant permission before an at-grade crossing can be constructed across the track of a railroad corporation. Pub. Util. Code § 1202 gives the Commission exclusive authority to determine the point of crossing, the terms of installation, and the terms of operation. As part of this authority, the Commission is tasked with evaluating proposed warning devices, technology and other safety measures, with the consent of the local jurisdiction.2 The basis of the Commission’s jurisdiction is not limited to Sections 1201 and 1202, the Commission is responsible for a number of different rail safety laws that, when read together give the Commission jurisdiction over railroad

1 All subsequent Section references are to the California Pub. Util. Code unless otherwise indicated.
2 Pub. Util. Code § 1202(d).

City Council/RSA Agenda 297 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 5 -
crossings in California. For example, Section 229 defines railroad to include any “commercial, interurban, and other railway, other than a street railroad,” and under Section 99152, “Any public transit guideway planned, acquired, or constructed, on or after January 1, 1979, is subject to regulations of the Public Utilities Commission relating to safety appliances and procedures.” Rule 3.7(c) provides additional details. As summarized in Decision (D.) 14-08-045,
Rule 3.7(c) requires applications to construct a railroad crossing be made by the municipal, county, state or other governmental authority which proposes construction and, if the proposed crossing is at-grade, the applicant must demonstrate that: 1) There is a public need to be served by the crossing; 2) A grade separation of the crossing is not practicable; and 3) There are warning signs, signals, and other devices at the crossing. All three elements of Rule 3.7(c) must be satisfied in order for the application to be approved.

The Commission’s analysis always begins with the presumption that grade separation is appropriate. The City bears the burden of overcoming this presumption with convincing evidence that this particular crossing will be safely operated as an at-grade crossing.

4. Discussion
The City and SED have provided evidence of how the public interest will be served by having the pedestrian crossing at-grade. These reasons are wellsummarized by the City in its Application and supplemental submissions:
a. The construction of an at-grade crossing will establish a direct pedestrian and bicycle connection to and from the BART station for new housing and job centers in the City’s Station District as well as the new 800-stall parking lot. b. The current configuration requires commuters to travel ½ mile from the 800-stall parking lot to the west BART
City Council/RSA Agenda 298 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 6 -
entrance, crossing the railroad tracks at Mile Post 26.90 on a Decoto Road sidewalk without pedestrian signals.
c. The City’s Station District Plan was approved in 2001 to create new multiple points of pedestrian, bicycle, and bus access to the Union City BART Station and included the
new east entrance.
d. The City expended $71 million to remodel the Union City BART station to create the new east entrance.
e. The City has invested $161 million on property
acquisitions, installation of infrastructure for high density housing and offices in the Station District, reconfiguration of the BART Station, and construction of 250 units of
affordable housing.
f. It would cost more than $200 million to create a pedestrian grade-separated crossing to the new east entrance.
g. The City has overseen more than $450 million in private sector investment for construction of 1,300 housing units in the Station District less than ¼ mile from the east entrance.

An additional 443 residential units and 1.2 million square feet of office space are seeking entitlements to construct in the Station District within ¼ mile of the new east entrance. h. The Alameda County Transportation Commission is
specifically funding the construction of the pedestrian at-grade crossing to provide easier access to the Union City BART station.

SED does not dispute the factual truth of the City’s reasoning or that the City’s reasons do not demonstrate that the crossing is in the public interest.

Safety is of paramount importance to the Commission. Ensuring safe rail crossings is in the public interest. But safety and public interest are not synonymous. Evaluating a particular facility for safety is different from evaluating what is in the public interest as a whole. The safest course would be to allow for no rail crossing, however, that would not be practicable nor in the public interest. When a crossing must occur, usually the safest type of crossing is City Council/RSA Agenda 299 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 7 -
a separated grade crossing. However, the public interest requires a more nuanced review that considers the public interest as a whole. This includes safety impacts of a separated grade crossing and the use of the existing crossings.

As discussed below, both of these options are impracticable and present safety concerns.

Those safety concerns include: the nearest crossing is at-grade and not designed for pedestrians and requires pedestrians to walk an additional ½ mile; individuals may choose to cut the fence and walk across the tracks at-grade to avoid walking to the nearest crossing; and the significant amount of time the existing conditions will exist before a grade-separated crossing could be funded and built makes it impracticable that such a grade-separated crossing would be built.

In an effort to improve safety at the new at-grade pedestrian crossing the City has agreed with SED that it will install the following:
a. Two CPUC Standard Number 8 (flashing light signal
assembly) warning devices;
b. Two CPUC Standard Number 9 (flashing light signal
assembly with automatic pedestrian gate) pedestrian
warning devices;
c. Two pedestrian exit swing gates;
d. Advance Americans with Disability Act (ADA) tactile
stripes at each approach;
e. Fencing to channelize pedestrians to the crossing; and f. Precast concrete panel crossing surface.

Further, the applicant agrees to close an existing at-grade crossing, the existing “I” Street at-grade highway rail crossing, DOT Number 834187C, CPUC Number 004-26.70. The City identified this crossing for closure as the nearby BART support columns impair the sight distance from both “I” and 12th Streets.

City Council/RSA Agenda 300 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 8 -
As part of removing the existing “I” Street crossing, a new security fence will be erected on both sides of the track to prevent trespassing. The existing intersection where 12th Street, which parallels the Oakland Subdivision track, meets “I” Street would be rebuilt into a 90 degree turn leading away from the track using new curb, gutter, and barriers. The existing auto and pedestrian traffic would be diverted to either the existing “H” Street or Decoto Road atgrade crossings.

Finally, the City has committed to make a number of improvements to at-grade crossings in the vicinity of the proposed new crossing. Specifically, the City shall:

1. Install mitigation measures at the existing Niles
Subdivision Track Decoto Road at-grade highway-rail
crossing identified as DOT Number 749781G, CPUC
Number 001D-26.60;

2. Install sidewalk improvements at the existing Oakland Subdivision Track Decoto Road at-grade highway-rail
crossing identified as DOT Number 834186V, CPUC
Number 004-26.90;

3. Install mitigation measures at the existing Niles
Subdivision Track Whipple Road at-grade highway-rail
crossing identified as DOT Number 749776K, CPUC
Number 001D-25.60; and

4. Install mitigation measures at the existing Coast
Subdivision Track Smith Street identified as DOT
Number 749927X, CPUC Number 001-L-25.50.

All of the above mitigation measures and sidewalk improvements will be filed separately under General Order (GO) 88-B. The City’s commitment to these improvements is a factor in the consideration of its current request, but we take no action today on the mitigation measures and sidewalk improvements the City has committed to install.

City Council/RSA Agenda 301 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 9 -

4.1. Current Seven-Factor Test for Impracticability
Determining whether a separated grade crossing is or is not practicable is a fact-specific inquiry. The Commission has evaluated practicability of separated grade crossings on numerous occasions. In City of San Mateo v. SoPac Transp. Co., D.82-04-033 (City of San Mateo), the Commission distinguished between impracticable and impractical, focusing primarily on two facts: the physical possibility of constructing the separated grade crossing at the site and the cost of construction. The Commission found in City of San Mateo that the high cost of construction might make the separated grade crossing impractical, but the high cost, by itself, did not make the separated grade crossing impracticable.3 The Commission defined practicable as “being possible physically of performance, a capability of being used, a feasibility of construction.”4 In the years since City of San Mateo was decided, the Commission has laid out more specific factors for the analysis. Currently, the Commission uses a seven-factor test to determine practicability,5 and applies the same test at all at-grade crossing cases no matter whether a rail line is heavy rail or light rail.6

3 City of San Mateo, D.82-04-033, at n.8.
4 Id.
5 See, City of San Diego, D.03-12-018, City of Los Angeles, D.09-02-031, City of Los Angeles, D.14-08-045.
6 See, In the Matter of the Application of the Los Angeles to Pasadena Metro Blue Line Constructions Authority for an Order Authorizing the Construction of Two Light Rail Transit Tracks At-Grade Crossing West Avenue 45 in the City and County of Los Angeles, California, and Related Matters, D.02-05-047. See also, City of Bakersfield, D.04-08-013, City of Los Angeles, D.14-08-045, City of San Diego, D.03-12-018, City of Santa Rosa, D.16-09-002.

City Council/RSA Agenda 302 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 10 -
The seven factors, or criteria, for evaluating impracticability of a separated-grade crossing are as follows:

1. A demonstration of public need for the crossing;

2. A convincing showing that all potential safety hazards have been eliminated;

3. The concurrence of local community and emergency
authorities;

4. The opinions of the general public, and especially those who may be affected by an at-grade crossing;

5. A recommendation by Staff that it concurs in the safety of the proposed crossing, including any conditions;

6. Although less persuasive than safety considerations, the comparative costs of an at-grade crossing with a grade
separation; and

7. Commission precedent in factually similar crossings.

We set forth the analysis required by Rule 3.7(c) below, including application of the seven criteria. No party disputes whether the City has met the standard for impracticability using the seven-factor test.

4.1.1. Demonstration of Public Need
Rule 3.7(c)(1) requires the City of Union City demonstrate that there is a public need to be served by the proposed crossing. As explained above, the City and SED have provided evidence of how the public interest will be served by having the pedestrian crossing at-grade. That evidence also demonstrates that there is a public need that will be served by the crossing.

4.1.2. Convincing Showing that the City has
Eliminated All Potential Safety Hazards.

The City has made a convincing showing that it has eliminated all potential safety hazards. The proposed crossing has been designed to comply with numerous legal requirements. The design is ADA compliant. The design City Council/RSA Agenda 303 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 11 -
includes protection and warning devices in compliance with federal and State regulations (including GO 75-D and the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices).7 As part of the design process the City consulted with UPRR, Federal Railroad Administration and SED.

The City states that the steps and ramps associated with the crossing on the east side will be constructed outside the railroad right-of-way. However, due to structure constraints at the BART station, these will encroach a few feet into the UPRR right-of-way, though as far from the track as physically possible.8 The City also states the approaches to the new crossing will be totally enclosed with security fencing to direct all pedestrian traffic only to the crossing from each side. In addition, lighting to illuminate the pathway will be installed, and the crossing itself will be equipped with two CPUC No. 8 and two CPUC No. 9 warning devices (gates and lights), escape gates on either side of the crossing, and precast concrete panel crossing surface.9 SED stated that the proposed design meets all legal requirements.10

4.1.3. Concurrence of Local Community Emergency
Authorities, and the General Public.

The local community, emergency authorities, and the general public all support an at-grade crossing at milepost 27.10 of UPRR Oakland Subdivision railroad track to facilitate entrance to the BART station. The City Council

7 Application at 6.
8 Id.
9 Id.
10 Response of the Safety and Enforcement Division of the Commission, Attachment A at 2.

City Council/RSA Agenda 304 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 12 -
approved the at-grade crossing proposal in a resolution. UPRR supports the at-grade pedestrian crossing.11
No community groups or others came forward to express opposition to the at-grade crossing, or the closing of the at-grade crossing at “I” Street. There is no support in the record for a separated-grade crossing.

4.1.4. Recommendation of Staff that it Concurs with
the Safety of the Proposed Crossing.

As explained above SED submitted a late filed response and a motion to accept the late filed response in June. In its response SED did not oppose the application but sought to apprise the Commission of relevant information on this project, including information on SED’s past site visit and the type and location of warning devices that it recommends be implemented at the crossing. In Attachment A to its response, SED states “the application meets the requirements of CPUC staff and Rules of Practice and Procedure, Rule 3.7.”12

4.1.5. Comparative Cost
Either type of crossing will cost millions of dollars. Since the adoption of the Station District Plan, the City has invested $161 million on property acquisitions, installation of infrastructure, construction of 250 units of affordable housing, and reconfiguration of the BART Station. The Union City BART Station was designed and remodeled to create a new east entrance at a cost of $71 million paid for by the City and leveraged county, regional, state, and federal grants.

11 Application at Exhibit F.
12 Response of the Safety and Enforcement Division of the Commission, Attachment A at 2.

City Council/RSA Agenda 305 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 13 -
While the City of Union City’s ultimate plan for the Station District is to elevate the Oakland Subdivision tracks sufficiently to facilitate a full multimodal transportation station by allowing the pathway to be grade-separated, funding for such an endeavor is dependent upon future bond measures. The engineers estimated in 2006 it would cost $200 million to elevate the Oakland Subdivision tracks to create a pedestrian grade separation, and that did not include the cost of acquiring the Oakland Subdivision. Installation of a grade-separated pedestrian crossing at the BART station now would increase those estimated costs for the long-term plans to elevate the Oakland Subdivision tracks.

4.1.6. Commission Precedent
The practicability of a separated-grade crossing is a fact-specific analysis that requires a weighing of the factors above. In assessing practicability of a separated-grade crossing, prior cases have considered whether the line is a heavy or light rail, whether the crossing is for pedestrians or vehicles, the number of trains, train speeds, and support of the local community and emergency authorities.

In 2003, the Commission held that a separated-grade crossing was impracticable for a heavy and light rail crossing that was part of a redevelopment project in San Diego. In that case the community was divided, with some supporting an at-grade crossing and others opposing the redevelopment project as a whole.13 Other factors the Commission considered in that case included increased traffic from separate ongoing development near the crossing, a cost of more than $30 million more for the grade-separated crossing, and how the

13 D.03-12-018.

City Council/RSA Agenda 306 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 14 -
separated crossing would have divided the downtown area and interfered with many buildings’ views of San Diego Bay.

In 2014, the Commission found that a two-track light rail crossing for trains not exceeding 35 miles per hour did not warrant an additional $250 to $300 million expenditure on a grade-separated crossing.14 In that case, several community groups opposed the at-grade crossings. When weighing the factors, the Commission emphasized that safety requirements had been met and that the high cost of the separated-grade crossing was not justifiable.

The Commission has also denied at-grade crossing proposals in part because of lack of support from local emergency authorities.15 The Commission has also denied an application for an at-grade crossing where the rail line was used by 14 freight and 32 passenger trains per day and there was an existing unauthorized crossing.
16 In that case, the Commission did not reach the seven factor test because the applicant failed to meet the threshold requirement of demonstrating a public need for the crossing. A key factor in the analysis was the existence of a legal crossing just 926 feet away.

At-grade crossings have been authorized most often in situations where, like here, the applicant agrees to close an existing at-grade crossing.17 At-grade crossings have also been approved in situation where it is expected there will be

14 D.14-08-045.
15 See D.09-02-031, D.06-06-032.
16 D.13-02-003.
17 See, e.g., D.15-05-043 (authorizing at-grade crossing in the County of Santa Cruz), D.13-12-044 (authorizing at-grade pedestrian crossing in Fremont).

City Council/RSA Agenda 307 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 15 -
fewer than 10 trains per week and/or trains will be travelling at slow speeds.18 The City argues that the limited freight service19 plus the proposed passenger train service,20 and the closing of the existing public at-grade crossing at “I” Street makes its application closely resemble those that the Commission has approved in the past. Further the significant additional cost of a grade-separated crossing that would require elevating the Oakland Subdivision track, the support of local authorities and the SED and the convincing showing that it has eliminated all potential safety hazards support a finding of impracticability in this case.

Commission precedent demonstrates that a finding of impracticability can be made even when it is physically possible to build a separated-grade crossing.

Important considerations in other cases authorizing at-grade crossings include:
the closure of an existing at-grade crossing, support of local authorities, safe design and train speeds, physical separation of the community, and local development plans. Most of these considerations are found in the instant case.

The facts in the case at hand while similar to D.14-08-045 and D.03-12-018, where the Commission approved at-grade crossings, are most comparable to D.13-12-044 which authorized an at-grade crossing in Fremont where there was strong community support for a crossing and applicant would close an existing crossing.

18 See D.04-08-013 (authorizing at-grade crossing where low volume of trains (2-3 per day) would be travelling at slow speeds (10 mph)). 19 Application, Supplemental Attachment B2, Draft EIR Volume 1 at 3.1-6. 20 Application, Supplemental Attachment B2, Draft EIR Volume 1 at 3.7-5.

City Council/RSA Agenda 308 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 16 -

4.1.7. Seven-Factor Standard Supports At-Grade
Crossing
The City of Union City applied the seven-factor test to the proposed railroad crossing for the east entrance to the BART station and found that a separated-grade crossing was impracticable. SED agreed that the application meets its requirements and Rule 3.7. This decision reaches the same conclusion.

All seven factors are considered in our determination of impracticability. In particular, the long term planning, development, and commitment of financial resources shows the strong local support for an at-grade crossing at this time.

The evidentiary record in this case reflects that at this time implementing a separated-grade crossing is impracticable.

4.2. Environmental Review and California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA)
The City is the lead agency for this project under CEQA, as amended. In March 2002, the City issued a Final EIR for the Community Redevelopment Project that included the Transit Oriented District. The Final EIR found that potentially significant impacts under the Commission’s purview could result from a pedestrian grade-separated crossing under the BART and UPRR tracks, but that these impacts would be reduced to less-than significant levels with implementation of the identified mitigation measures. In June 2005, the City issued a Final EIR for the City Intermodal Station Project. On June 30, 2005, the City filed a Notice of Determination indicating the project will have a significant impact on the environment, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the impacts that could not be fully mitigated.

Regarding impacts from the rail-crossing aspect of the project, mitigations measures require that the City (1) develop and implement construction noise abatement and mitigation plan; (2) ensure construction contractors have City Council/RSA Agenda 309 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 17 -
sound-control devices with all relevant provisions of applicable local noise policies and ordinances; (3) ensure all construction equipment has sound-control devices no less effective than those provided on the original equipment and that no equipment has un-muffled exhaust; and (4) ensure the contractor implements appropriate additional noise mitigation measures including, but not limited to, changing the location of stationary construction equipment, shutting off idling equipment, rescheduling construction activity, notifying adjacent residents in advance of construction work, rerouting heavy truck traffic, or installing acoustic barriers around stationary construction noise sources or construction sites.

Further mitigation measures related to dust control include limiting traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour and installing sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways.

5. Categorization and Need for Hearing
In Resolution ALJ 176-3394 dated March 24, 2017, the Commission preliminarily determined that this proceeding should be categorized as ratesetting and that hearings were required. The Scoping Memo issued on October 13, 2017, confirmed the ratesetting categorization, but concluded that there were no issues of disputed facts requiring evidentiary hearings.

Accordingly, we formally change the preliminary determination to find that no hearings are required.

6. Comments on Proposed Decision
The proposed decision of the ALJ in this matter was mailed to the parties in accordance with Section 311 of the Public Utilities Code and comments were allowed under Rule 14.3 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.

No comments were filed.

City Council/RSA Agenda 310 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 18 -

7. Assignment of Proceeding
Clifford Rechtschaffen is the assigned Commissioner and Robert Haga is the assigned ALJ in this proceeding.

Findings of Fact

1. On February 27, 2017, the City filed the instant application (Application 17-02-010) for an order authorizing the construction, maintenance, and operation of a new at-grade crossing to provide pedestrian connection to the City’s Transit Oriented District and BART station.

2. Notice of the application appeared on the Commission’s Daily Calendar on March 6, 2017.

3. On June 21, 2017, the City supplemented its application with additional information regarding its environmental review and report.

4. On August 3, 2017, the City further supplemented its application with additional information regarding the Final EIR and a summary of the environmental impacts and mitigation measures identified for the project in the environmental reports.

5. On June 29, 2017, the SED submitted a late-filed response and a motion to accept the late-filed response.

6. The proposed new at-grade crossing would be at mile post 27.10, located approximately 1,000 ft. south (railroad east) of the Decoto Road /Union Pacific Railroad Oakland Subdivision railroad crossing, City of Union City, California, mile post 26.90, and will be identified as CPUC Crossing Number 004-27.08 and DOT Number 859611R.

7. The City has committed to install the following at the new at-grade crossing at mile post 27.10:
a. Two CPUC Standard Number 8 (flashing light signal
assembly) warning devices;
City Council/RSA Agenda 311 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 19 -
b. Two CPUC Standard Number 9 (flashing light signal
assembly with automatic pedestrian gate) pedestrian
warning devices;
c. Two pedestrian exit swing gates;
d. Advance Americans with Disability Act (ADA) tactile
stripes at each approach;
e. Fencing to channelize pedestrians to the crossing; and f. Precast concrete panel crossing surface.

8. The existing at-grade crossing at “I” Street at mile post 26.70 (CPUC Crossing Number 004-26.70, DOT Number 834187C) will be closed upon completion of the new at-grade crossing.

9. No protests were filed to the City’s application.

10. The City is the lead agency for this project under CEQA, as amended.

11. In March 2002, the City issued a Final EIR for the Community Redevelopment Project that included the Transit Oriented District.

12. In June 2005, the City issued a Final EIR for the City’s TOD and Intermodal Station Project.

13. On June 30, 2005, the City of Union City filed a Notice of Determination indicating the project will have a significant impact on the environment, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the impacts that could not be fully mitigated.

14. The Final EIR required mitigation measures to address impacts from the rail-crossing aspect of the project.

15. The crossing is necessary to provide a primary access route for the 800 parking stalls east of the BART station as well as the 1300 new housing units less than ¼ mile from the new east entrance to BART.

City Council/RSA Agenda 312 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 20 -

16. The crossing configuration provides a safer alternative over the existing atgrade crossing at I street that will be closed and is more practicable than constructing a grade-separated crossing, given the existing configuration of the Oakland Subdivision and the BART station, environmental impact, and cost exceeding the entire public investment in the Union City Station District.

17. The Commission is a responsible agency for this project and has reviewed and considered the lead agency’s FEIR, and Notice of Determination.

Conclusions of Law

1. The seven-factor test applies to the crossing proposed for the City’s TOD and Intermodal Station District.

2. A rail crossing to allow direct connection to the BART Station with the City’s TOD in the public interest and there is a public need for the crossing.

3. As a matter of policy, the Commission disfavors new at-grade crossings.

4. The unique facts of this crossing overcome the presumption against an at-grade crossing.

5. It is impracticable to construct a grade-separated overcrossing at the Transit Oriented District.

6. The City has convincingly shown that it has eliminated potential safety hazards.

7. The City has convincingly shown that it is in the public interest to close the existing at-grade pedestrian and vehicular crossing at “I” Street, mile post 26.70 (0.4 miles north (railroad west) of the proposed pedestrian crossing.

8. The City has committed to file under GO 88-B its plans to install mitigation measures for the Niles Subdivision Track Decoto Road at-grade highway-rail crossing identified as DOT Number 749781G, CPUC Number 001D-26.60.

City Council/RSA Agenda 313 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 21 -

9. The City has committed to file under GO 88-B its plans to install sidewalk improvements at the existing Oakland Subdivision Track Decoto Road at-grad highway-rail crossing identified as DOT Number 834186V, CPUC Number 004-26.90.

10. The City has committed to file under GO 88-B its plans to install mitigation measures at the existing Niles Subdivision Track Whipple Road at-grade highway-rail crossing identified as DOT Number 749776K, CPUC Number 001D-25.60.

11. The City has committed to file under GO 88-B its plans to install mitigation measures at the existing Coast Subdivision Track Smith Street identified as DOT No. 749927X, CPUC Number 001L-25.20.

12. The Final EIR found that potentially significant impacts under the Commission’s purview could result from a pedestrian grade-separated crossing under the BART and UPRR tracks, but that these impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of the identified mitigation measures.

13. The Commission has reviewed and considered the 2002, 2005, and 2006 Final EIRs and finds that they are adequate for its independent decision-making purposes.

14. Hearings are not necessary in this proceeding.

15. The proceeding should be closed.

O R D E R
IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The application by the City of Union City for an at-grade crossing at mile post 27.10, located approximately 1,000 ft. south (railroad east) of the Decoto City Council/RSA Agenda 314 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 22 -
Road/Union Pacific Railroad Oakland Subdivision railroad crossing, City of Union City, California, mile post 26.90, is approved.

2. The new at-grade crossing at mile post 27.10 for the City of Union City’s Transit Oriented Development and Intermodal Station District shall have the crossing treatments and configuration described above and specified in the application. The new public at-grade crossing at mile post 27.10 for the City of Union City’s Transit Oriented Development and Intermodal Station will be identified as DOT Number 859611R, and CPUC Crossing Number 004-27.08.

3. The City of Union City shall install the following at the new at-grade crossing at mile post 27.10:
a. Two CPUC Standard Number 8 (flashing light signal
assembly) warning devices;
b. Two CPUC Standard Number 9 (flashing light signal
assembly with automatic pedestrian gate) pedestrian
warning devices;
c. Two pedestrian exit swing gates;
d. Advance Americans with Disability Act tactile stripes at each approach;
e. Fencing to channelize pedestrians to the crossing; and f. Precast concrete panel crossing surface.

4. Upon completion of the new at-grade crossing at mile post 27.10, the City of Union City shall permanently close the existing at-grade pedestrian and vehicular crossing at “I” Street, mile post 26.70, identified as CPUC Crossing Number 004-26.70, and DOT Number 834187C.

5. We adopt and incorporate by reference the significant environmental impacts and proposed mitigation measures set forth in the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared by the City of Union City.

City Council/RSA Agenda 315 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 23 -

6. We adopt and incorporate by reference the Findings of Fact in the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared by the City of Union City.

7. The City of Union City shall provide the Commission’s Rail Crossings Engineering Section of the Rail Crossings and Engineering Branch of the Safety Enforcement Division finalized engineering crossing designs prior to commencement of construction activities. The Rail Crossings Engineering Section of the Rail Crossings and Engineering Branch of the Safety Enforcement Division will evaluate their conformance with the crossing designs approved in this decision.

8. The City of Union City shall comply with all applicable rules, including Commission General Orders and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

9. The City of Union City shall notify the Commission’s Rail Crossings Engineering Section of the Rail Crossings and Engineering Branch of the Safety Enforcement Division at least 30 days prior to the opening of the crossing.

Notification should be made by certified U.S. Mail and by e-mail to [email protected].

10. With 30 days after completion of the work authorized by this decision, the City of Union City shall notify the Commission’s Rail Crossings Engineering Section of the Rail Crossings and Engineering Branch of the Safety Enforcement Division, in writing, by submitting a completed Commission Standard Form G (Report of Changes at Highway Grade Crossing and Separations), of the completion of the authorized work. Form G requirements and forms can be obtained at the California Public Utilities Commission web site. The completed report must be submitted in hard copy and via email to [email protected].

City Council/RSA Agenda 316 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
A.17-02-010 ALJ/RWH/ek4
- 24 -

11. This authorization shall expire if not exercised within three years of the issuance of this decision unless time is extended or if the above conditions are not satisfied. Authorization may be revoked or modified if public convenience, necessity or safety so require.

12. A request for extension of the three-year authorization must be submitted to the Commission’s Rail Crossings Engineering Section of the Rail Crossings and Engineering Branch of the Safety Enforcement Division at least 30 days before the expiration of that period.

13. The preliminary determination for this proceeding of hearings are necessary is changed to “no hearings necessary.”

14. All motions not previously ruled on in this proceeding are denied.

15. Application 17-02-010 is closed
This order is effective today.

Dated November 30, 2017, at San Francisco, California.

MICHAEL PICKER
President
CARLA J. PETERMAN
LIANE M. RANDOLPH

MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES

CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN
Commissioners
City Council/RSA Agenda 317 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
AUDiT acigal-13
UP Real Estate Folder No.: 3055-45

PUBLIC AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AGREEMENT

BART PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
DOT 859611R
MILE POST 27.08 — OAKLAND SUBDIVISION

CITY OF UNION CITY, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
THIS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the Lt day of ) )-717,—,2019 (the "Effective Date"), by and between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, to be addressed at Real Estate Department, 1400 Douglas Street, Mail Stop 1690, Omaha, Nebraska 68179 (the "Railroad") and CITY OF UNION CITY, a municipal corporation or political subdivision of the State of California to be addressed at 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, California 94587 (the "Political Body").

RECITALS:

The Political Body desires to undertake as its project (the "Project") the construction of a new public at-grade pedestrian crossing area over the Railroad's track(s) at or near Railroad's Milepost 27.08 (DOT No. 859611R) on Railroad's Oakland Subdivision at or near Union City, Alameda County, California, as such portion is more generally shown on the print marked Exhibit A and described in the legal description marked Exhibit A-1, with each exhibit being attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (the "Crossing Area") to accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists and other nonmotorized uses only. The portion of the paved area and appurtenances related thereto, including, without limitation, all applicable fencing, warning signs, pedestrian and bicycle control facilities and other related improvements shown on the Plans (defined below), located within the Crossing Area are the "Pedestrian Improvements".

In addition to the other consideration set forth herein, as consideration for the Railroad's grant of rights to the Political Body in connection with the Crossing Area pursuant to this Agreement, the Political Body agrees to: (a) install and maintain certain safety improvements at several existing Railroad crossings, including sidewalk improvements at Decoto Road (DOT No. 834186V) at or near Railroad's Milepost 26.70 on the Railroad's Oakland Subdivision, and (b) close and vacate the existing, at-grade public road crossing for I Street (DOT No. 834187C) at or near Railroad's Milepost

26.70 on Railroad's Oakland Subdivision ("I Street Crossing").

The Railroad and the Political Body are entering into this Agreement to cover the 1 City Council/RSA Agenda 318 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 above.

AGREEMENT:

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:

Section 1. EXHIBIT B
The general terms and conditions marked Exhibit B, are attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof.

Section 2. RAILROAD GRANTS RIGHT
For good and valuable consideration in the sum of Two Hundred Twenty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($228,200.00), the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the Political Body's agreement to perform and comply with the terms of this Agreement, the Railroad hereby grants to the Political Body a non-exclusive right to construct, use, maintain and repair the Crossing Area and related Pedestrian Improvements. For purposes of this Agreement and the grant of the rights hereunder with respect to the Crossing Area, use of the Crossing Area by the Political Body, and/or the Political Body's invitees, shall be limited to pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized uses. The Political Body shall not use or permit the use of the Pedestrian Improvements, the Crossing Area or any part thereof for any purpose other than the purposes expressly stated herein.

Section 3. DEFINITION OF CONTRACTOR
For purposes of this Agreement the term "Contractor" shall mean the contractor or contractors hired by the Political Body to perform any Project work on any portion of the Railroad's property and shall also include the Contractor's subcontractors and the Contractor's and subcontractor's respective employees, officers and agents, and others acting under its or their authority.

Section 4. CONTRACTOR'S RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT - INSURANCE A. Prior to Contractor performing any work on the Railroad's property involving the Project, and any subsequent maintenance or repair work of the Crossing Area and/or Pedestrian Improvements, the Political Body shall require the Contractor to:
• execute the Railroad's then current form of Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement (the "CROE Agreement");
• obtain the then current insurance required in the Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement; and
• provide such insurance policies, certificates, binders and/or endorsements to the Railroad.
2 City Council/RSA Agenda 319 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 B. The Railroad's current form of the CROE Agreement is marked Exhibit D, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. The Political Body confirms that it will inform its Contractor that it is required to execute such form of agreement and obtain the required insurance before commencing any work on any Railroad property. Under no circumstances will the Contractor be allowed on the Railroad's property without first executing the CROE Agreement, obtaining the insurance set forth therein and providing to the Railroad the insurance policies, binders, certificates and/or endorsements described therein.

C. All insurance correspondence, binders, policies, certificates and/or endorsements shall be sent to:

Senior Manager - Contracts
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Real Estate Department
1400 Douglas Street, Mail Stop 1690
Omaha, NE 68179-1690
UP File Folder No. 3055-45
D. In addition to the insurance coverage the Political Body's Contractor is required to obtain pursuant to the CROE Agreement, the Political Body shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain in effect during the entire term of this Agreement the insurance required in Railroad's Insurance Requirements marked Exhibit E, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The insurance to be procured and maintained by the Political Body hereunder shall not be permitted to expire or be canceled unless thirty (30) days prior written notice is provided to the Railroad, and the Political Body shall notify the Railroad of any cancellation, suspension or nonrenewal within seven (7) days of the Political Body's receipt of notice from the insurance company to that effect. Subject to the Railroad's prior review and approval (which approval shall be in the Railroad's sole discretion), the Political Body may self-insure all or a portion of the insurance coverage required to be maintained by the Political Body pursuant to Exhibit E.

Section 5. FEDERAL AID POLICY GUIDE
If the Political Body will be receiving any federal funding for the Project, the current rules, regulations and provisions of the Federal Aid Policy Guide as contained in 23 CFR 140, Subpart I and 23 CFR 646, Subparts A and B are incorporated into this Agreement by reference.

Section 6. NO PROJECT EXPENSES TO BE BORNE BY RAILROAD
The Political Body agrees that no Project costs and expenses are to be borne by the Railroad. In addition, the Railroad is not required to contribute any funding for the Project.
3 City Council/RSA Agenda 320 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Section 7. WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY RAILROAD; BILLING SENT TO POLITICAL BODY; POLITICAL BODY'S PAYMENT OF BILLS
A. The work to be performed by the Railroad in connection with the Project, at the Political Body's sole cost and expense, is described in the Railroad's Material and Force Account Estimates dated April 17, 2019 and dated June 21, 2017, respectively, and marked Exhibit C, Exhibit C-1, and Exhibit C-2 with each exhibit being attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (collectively, the "Estimate"). As set forth in the Estimate, the Railroad's total estimated cost for all of the Railroad's work associated with the Project is Five Hundred Seven Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six and No/100 Dollars ($507,666.00)
B. The Railroad, if it so elects, may recalculate and update the Estimate submitted to the Political Body in the event the Political Body does not commence construction on the portion of the Project located on the Railroad's property within six (6) months after the date of the Estimate.

C. The Political Body acknowledges that the Estimate may or may not include any estimate of flagging or other protective service costs that are to be paid by the Political Body or the Contractor in connection with flagging or other protective services provided by the Railroad in connection with the Project. All of such costs incurred by the Railroad are to be paid by the Political Body or the Contractor as determined by the Railroad and the Political Body. If it is determined that the Railroad will be billing the Contractor directly for such costs, the Political Body agrees that it will pay the Railroad for any flagging costs that have not been paid by any Contractor within thirty (30) days after the Contractor's receipt of billing.

D. The Railroad shall send progressive billings to the Political Body during the Project, and a final billing to the Political Body within one hundred eighty (180) days after receiving written notice from the Political Body that all Project work affecting the Railroad's property has been completed.

E. The Political Body agrees to reimburse the Railroad within thirty (30) days after its receipt of billing from the Railroad for one hundred percent (100%) of all actual costs incurred by the Railroad in connection with the Project including, but not limited to, all actual costs of engineering review (including preliminary engineering review costs incurred by the Railroad prior to the Effective Date), construction, inspection, flagging (unless flagging costs are to be billed directly to the Contractor), procurement of materials, equipment rental, manpower and deliveries to the job site and all direct and indirect overhead labor/construction costs including Railroad's standard additive rates.

The standard additive rates shall be subject to upward or downward adjustment based on industry standards and practices and the parties acknowledge and agree that any such adjustment to standard additive rates may be made retroactively. 4 City Council/RSA Agenda 321 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Section 8. PLANS
A. The Political Body, at its expense, shall prepare, or cause to be prepared by others, the detailed designs, plans and specifications for the Project and submit such designs, plans and specifications to the Railroad's Assistant Vice President Engineering-Design, or his authorized representative, for prior review and approval.

The designs, plans and specifications shall include the Crossing Area layout specifications, cross sections and elevations, associated drainage, and other appurtenances.

B. The Railroad shall have the right to review and approve or disapprove all designs, plans and specifications and proposed changes thereto for the Project (including, without limitation, subsequent iterations of the designs, plans and specifications), with respect to, inter alia, determining whether (i) the designs, plans and specifications (preliminary and final) and/or changes meet all applicable then-current Railroad standards and requirements, including without limitation, American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association ("AREMA") standards and guidelines, as applicable; (ii) the designs, plans and specifications (preliminary and final) and/or changes meet the terms and conditions of the Railroad's then-existing agreements with third parties, and do not otherwise adversely impact the use or condition of the Railroad's property; and (iii) there will be any interference with or danger to the Railroad's property or the Railroad's common carrier freight rail operations, during or after completion of the Project (collectively, the "Railroad Standards").

C. The final one hundred percent (100%) completed designs, plans and specifications for the Project that are approved in writing by the Railroad's Assistant Vice President Engineering-Design, or his authorized representative, are hereinafter referred to as the "Plans". The Plans are hereby made a part of this Agreement by reference. No Project work may commence on the Railroad's property until the Plans have been approved by the Railroad.

D. No changes in the Plans shall be made unless the Railroad has consented to such changes in writing.

E. The Railroad's review and approval of the Plans in no way relieves the Political Body or the Contractor from their responsibilities, obligations and/or liabilities under this Agreement, and the Railroad's review and approval of the Plans will be given with the understanding that the Railroad makes no representations or warranties as to the validity, accuracy, legal compliance or completeness of the Plans and that any reliance by the Political Body or its Contractor on the Plans is at the risk of the Political Body and/or its Contractor, respectively. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the Railroad's review will be performed solely for its own purposes and benefit and the Railroad shall not be deemed to be liable to the Political Body or any other party for defects in the Plans.
5 City Council/RSA Agenda 322 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Section 9. NON-RAILROAD IMPROVEMENTS
A. Submittal of plans and specifications for protecting, encasing, reinforcing, relocation, replacing, removing and abandoning in place all non-railroad owned facilities (the "Non Railroad Facilities") affected by the Project including, without limitation, utilities, fiber optics, pipelines, wirelines, communication lines and fences is required under Section 8. The Non Railroad Facilities plans and specifications shall comply with the Railroad's standard specifications and requirements, including, without limitation, AREMA standards and guidelines. The Railroad has no obligation to supply additional land for any Non Railroad Facilities and does not waive its right to assert preemption defenses, challenge the right-to-take, or pursue compensation in any condemnation action, regardless if the submitted Non Railroad Facilities plans and specifications comply with the Railroad's standard specifications and requirements. The Railroad has no obligation to permit any Non Railroad Facilities to be abandoned in place or relocated on the Railroad's property.

B. Upon the Railroad's approval of submitted Non Railroad Facilities plans and specifications, the Railroad will attempt to incorporate them into new agreements or supplements of existing agreements with the Non Railroad Facilities owners or operators. The Railroad may use its standard terms and conditions, including, without limitation, its standard license fee and administrative charges when requiring supplements or new agreements for the Non Railroad Facilities. Non Railroad Facilities work shall not commence before a supplement or new agreement has been fully executed by the Railroad and the Non Railroad Facilities owner or operator, or before the Railroad and the Political Body mutually agree in writing to (i) deem the approved Non Railroad Facilities plans and specifications to be Plans pursuant to Section 80, (ii) deem the Non Railroad Facilities part of the Crossing Area, and (iii) supplement this Agreement with terms and conditions covering the Non Railroad Facilities.

Section 10. EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM; TERMINATION
A. This Agreement is effective as of the Effective Date and shall continue in full force and effect for as long as the Pedestrian Improvements remain on the Railroad's property.

B. The Railroad, if it so elects, may terminate this Agreement effective upon delivery of written notice to the Political Body in the event the Political Body does not commence construction on the portion of the Project located on the Railroad's property within twelve (12) months after the Effective Date.

C. If the Agreement is terminated as provided above, or for any other reason, the Political Body shall pay to the Railroad all actual costs incurred by the Railroad in connection with the Project up to the date of termination, including, without limitation, all actual costs incurred by the Railroad in connection with reviewing any preliminary or final Project plans.
6 City Council/RSA Agenda 323 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Section 11. MONITORING AND MITIGATION OBLIGATIONS
The Political Body and the Railroad agree to continually assess and monitor the public's use of the Crossing Area in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and shall reasonably cooperate to address any safety concerns posed by the use of the Crossing Area by the public, including without limitation, mitigating and deterring incidents of trespass by the public on the Railroad's property. Any mitigation strategy proposed by the parties shall take into consideration factors of cost and safety and shall not obstruct or hinder the Railroad's operations. In accordance with Section 8 above, the Railroad shall have the right to review and approve plans for any improvements to be constructed or installed on the Railroad's property as part of any mitigation strategy adopted by the parties under this Section 11.

Section 12. CLOSURE AND VACATION OF I STREET CROSSING
A. Upon completion of the Project, the Political Body shall take all actions necessary to permanently close and vacate the I Street Crossing and any easements and/or any other rights across the Railroad's property in connection with such crossing.

B. The Political Body, at its expense, shall install, maintain, repair and renew permanent barricades on both sides of the I Street Crossing with such barricades to be located off of the Railroad's property and to be in compliance with all applicable standards and guidelines contained in the current Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

C. The Political Body, at its expense, shall also (i) provide new advance street signs and pavement markings to indicate that the I Street Crossing is closed, with such signage to be in compliance with applicable current MUTCD standards and guidelines, (ii) install curbs and gutters on the side of the I Street Crossing where I Street intersects with 12thStreet, and (iii) require its Contractor to execute the CROE, and for the Contractor to provide to the Railroad the insurance policies, certificates and endorsements required therein before allowing any Contractor access to the Railroad's property in connection with the I Street Crossing closure work.

D. After completion of the work to be performed by the Political Body pursuant to Paragraphs B and C above, the Railroad, at the Political Body's expense, agrees to remove the railroad crossing surface and any warning devices in connection with the I Street Crossing which currently exist on the Railroad's right-of-way. The work to be performed by the Railroad in connection with the closure and vacation of the I Street Crossing is included as Exhibit C-2. The Political Body agrees that the reimbursement provisions included in this Agreement shall apply to any work to be reimbursed to the Railroad for the closure work described herein, including without limitation reimbursement for any railroad flagging or protection required in connection with any work performed hereunder. For avoidance of doubt, all work to be performed by the Political Body pursuant to Paragraphs B and C above shall be completed prior to 7 City Council/RSA Agenda 324 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 the Railroad commencing the work set forth in this Paragraph.

E. In connection with the closure and vacation of the I Street Crossing, the Political Body shall forever grant, remise, release and quitclaim to the Railroad, its successors and assigns, any and all right, title, and interest it may have in the I Street Crossing Area and agrees to execute, acknowledge and deliver documents and perform such further acts as may be required in order to facilitate the grant, quitclaim and release of any property rights in the I Street Crossing Area as contemplated by this Section 12.

Section 13. CONDITIONS TO BE MET BEFORE

POLITICAL BODY CAN COMMENCE WORK
Neither the Political Body nor the Contractor may commence any work on the Railroad's property until:
(i) The Railroad and Political Body have executed this Agreement. (ii) The Railroad has provided to the Political Body the Railroad's written approval of the Plans.
(iii) Each Contractor has executed the CROE Agreement and has obtained and/or provided to the Railroad the insurance policies, certificates, binders, and/or endorsements required under the CROE Agreement. (iv) Each Contractor has given the advance notice(s) required under the CROE Agreement to the Railroad's representative named in the CROE Agreement.
(v) The Political Body has obtained the requisite written approval of the Project from the California Public Utility Commission and delivered to Railroad a copy of such approval.
(vi) The Political Body has procured the insurance required under Section 4D above.

Section 14. FUTURE PROJECTS
Future projects involving substantial maintenance, repair, reconstruction, renewal and/or demolition of the Crossing Area and/or Pedestrian Improvements shall not commence until the Railroad and Political Body agree on the plans for such future projects, cost allocations, right of entry terms and conditions and temporary construction rights, terms and conditions.
8 City Council/RSA Agenda 325 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Section 15. ASSIGNMENT; SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
A. The Political Body shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Railroad, which consent shall be in the Railroad's sole and absolute discretion.

B. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph A above, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the Railroad and Political Body.

Section 16. FEDERAL FUNDING
If the Political Body will be receiving any federal funds for the Project, the Political Body agrees that it is solely responsible for performing and completing all reporting requirements in connection with the Project and receipt of such funding and that the Railroad shall not have any responsibility in connection with the same. The Political Body also confirms and acknowledges that (A) the Railroad shall provide to the Political Body the Railroad's standard and customary billing for expenses incurred by the Railroad for the Project including the Railroad's standard and customary documentation to support such billing, and (B) such standard and customary billing and documentation from the Railroad provides the information needed by the Political Body to perform and complete any such reporting requirements in connection with any federal funding. The Railroad confirms that the Political Body shall have the right to audit the Railroad's billing and documentation for the Project as provided in Section 11 of Exhibit B of this Agreement.

Section 17. SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Political Body, at its sole cost and expense, shall install and maintain certain safety improvements at: (i) Decoto Road (DOT No. 834186V) at or near Railroad's Milepost 26.90 on Railroad's Oakland Subdivision, in accordance with the plans and specifications attached hereto as Exhibit F and hereby made a part of this Agreement (the "Project Plans") and (ii) several existing Railroad crossings, as further described on Exhibit G attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (collectively, the "Safety Improvements"). The Safety Improvements shall be completed on or before twenty-four (24) months after the Effective Date, and all work related to the Safety Improvements shall be performed and completed in a manner satisfactory to the Railroad and in compliance with the Decoto Plans and the Railroad Standards and in accordance with the requirements of California Public Utilities Commission's ("CPUC") General Order (GO) 88-B, as applicable. No changes to the Decoto Plans may be made unless the Railroad has consented to such changes in writing and approval from CPUC is obtained. Political Body agrees to provide Railroad preliminary engineering agreement for Safety Improvements provided herein within one hundred twenty (120) days after the Effective Date. Any work to be performed by the Railroad in connection with the Safety Improvements will be included in a material and force account estimate to be provided to the Political Body separate from this Agreement. The Political Body agrees that the reimbursement provisions included in this Agreement shall apply to any work to be reimbursed to the Railroad for 9 City Council/RSA Agenda 326 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 any work performed by the Railroad in connection with the Safety Improvements, including without limitation reimbursement for any railroad flagging or protection required in connection therewith. The Political Body acknowledges and agrees that the Political Body's obligations to install the Safety Improvements is a material element of the Railroad's willingness to grant the rights described herein, and the failure of the Political Body to timely comply with the terms and conditions of this Section shall constitute a default under this Agreement.

Section 18. LIABILITY
The Political Body, for itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that its use and occupancy of the Crossing Area is at the Political Body's own risk, and the Political Body agrees to and does assume all risks thereof and incidental thereto, including without limitation, risks incident to train operations within the Railroad's right of way. The Political Body acknowledges that such use of the Crossing Area for the purposes set forth herein will subject the Railroad's property and operations to additional hazards and liability; and as material consideration for this Agreement, the Political Body, to the extent permitted by law, shall release, save, protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Railroad, and its respective affiliates, and their respective officers, agents and employees, against and from any and all liability, loss, damages, claims, demands, costs and expenses, fines and penalties of whatsoever nature, including court costs and attorney's fees, arising from and growing out of any injury or death of persons whomsoever (including officers, agents and employees of the Railroad or the Political Body and of any Contractor as well as other persons) or loss of or damage to property whatsoever (including property of or in the custody of the Railroad, the Political Body or any Contractor as well as other property). The Political Body's obligation to indemnify shall accrue when such injury, death, loss or damage occurs or arises from (i) the presence or use of the Crossing Area, (ii) the trespass upon the Railroad's right of way and trackage adjacent to the Crossing Area by the Political Body, its agents, employees, Contractors, invitees or permitted users or (iii) a breach of this Agreement. The Political Body agrees that it will not raise either the California worker's compensation statutes, nor the Government Tort Claims Act, as a defense to any claim of indemnity by the Railroad pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

Section 19. ANNUAL SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
A. Effective as of the Effective Date, the Political Body, as contemplated by Section 5.C. of Exhibit B, agrees to pay to the Railroad the sum of SEVEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY and No/100 Dollars ($7,990.00) per annum, payable annually in advance, as payment for the Railroad's maintenance of the railroad crossing warning signals that are to be installed by the Railroad within the Crossing Area.

B. The above annual fee is based on the number of current signal units within the Crossing Area. Effective on the date that is one year after the Effective Date and on the anniversary date of each subsequent one year period, the annual fee will be increased at a rate based on the American Association of Railroad's (AAR) signal unit 10 City Council/RSA Agenda 327 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 cost index. Such changes in the maintenance fee may be made by the Railroad by means of automatic adjustment in billing. The signal unit base for the annual fee may be re-determined by the Railroad at any time subsequent to the expiration of five (5) years following the date on which the annual rental was last determined or established.

Such changes in the maintenance fee may be made by means of automatic adjustment in billing.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
11 City Council/RSA Agenda 328 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the Effective Date first herein written.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation
By: /194ns:4 a.

Printed Name: DANIÉL A. I FIS
Title: GENERAL DIRECTOR REAL ESTATE
CITY OF UNION CITY, a municipal corporation
or political subdivision of the State of California
By:

Printed
Title: C., 'I -7-`( i\kA-nlkR
12 City Council/RSA Agenda 329 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the Effective Date first herein written.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation
By: /04t4,,61 4.

Printed Name: aivis3 Tufl11:10103HICI1V113N3D
Title: SI31 'V 11NVCI
CITY OF UNION CITY, a municipal corporation
or political subdivision of the State of California
By:

Printe
Title: I 71 NA Pc-Nt6d-,
12 City Council/RSA Agenda 330 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT A
TO

PUBLIC AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AGREEMENT
Exhibit A will be a print showing the Crossing Area (see Recitals) DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 331 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
k5MA CROSSING AREA
UPRRCO. R/W OUTLINED
CADD

FILENAME
0305545
SCAN

FILENAME
CW01017K-305545.TIF

LEGENDS
CROSSING AREA z.3.275 SO. FT. +1-
NOTE: BEFORE YOU BEGIN ANY WORK. SEE
AGREEMENT FOR FIBER OPTIC PROVISIONS.

EXHIBIT "A"

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
UNION CITY. ALAMEDA COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
M.P. 27.08 - OAKLAND SUB.

MAP WP V-3 / 8
SCALE: 1" = 100'

OFFICE OF REAL ESTATE
OMAHA, NEBRASKA DATE: 2-25-2018
PJB FILE: 0305545
City Council/RSA Agenda 332 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
EXHIBIT A-1
TO

PUBLIC AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AGREEMENT
Exhibit A-1 will be the legal description of the Crossing Area (see Recitals) DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 333 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Exhibit A
Pedestrian Access Crossing Agreement Area
Lying within the State of California, County of Alameda, City of Union City and being a portion of the lands of the Union Pacific Railroad as described by deed recorded in Book 55 of Deeds Page 342, Alameda County Records, said portion is more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the most westerly corner of Lot 5 as shown on the map of Tract 8002 as filed in Book 305 of Maps, Pages 1 and 2, Alameda County Records, also being on the northeasterly line of said lands of Union Pacific Railroad (55 d 342); thence northwesterly along the common line of said lands of Union Pacific Railroad (55 d 342) and Tract 8002 (305 m 1) North 45° 03' 43" West, 147.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said common line North 45° 03' 43" West, 32.00 feet; thence leaving said common line, South 44° 56' 17" West, 69.00 feet; thence North 45° 03' 43" West, 11.00 feet; thence South 44° 56' 17" West, 11.00 feet to the southwesterly right of way line of said lands of Union Pacific Railroad (55 d 342); thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 45° 03' 43" West,

97.00 feet; thence leaving said line, N 440 56 '17" E, 11.00 feet; thence North 45° 03' 43" West, 54.00 feet; thence N 44° 56' 17" E, 69.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 3,275 square feet, more or less.

Attached hereto is a plat entitled "Exhibit B" which by this reference is made a part hereof.

Prepared by:
0 CQI A -1Lp)- -2,cAs
Darryl Alexandir, P.L.S. 5071r Date
City Council/RSA Agenda 334 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
N 44' 56'17"E 80.00'
LOT 5, TRACT MAP NO. 8002
EXHIBIT "B"
b
o
.. —
N) d7+1 S 44 56'17"W 11.00' 0
,___\
i„)
in d.

S 44' 56'17"W 69.00'

69.60'

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

AGREEMENT AREA
co
O .
z
a a'
Nsj
I—I N ,— 5
<0 rtM
rq
0 7.)

TRANSIT DISTRICT
h:

11.1 —7N 44' 56'17"E 11.00'
N 44' 56'17"E 69.00'
45 03'43"W 147.50

POINT OF BEGINNING
10'

NO BUILD RESERVED

FOR FUTURE

RAILROAD PURPOSES

LANDS OF

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
55 D 342

OWNER AND

MAILING ADDRESS

PROPERTY AREAS CITY OF UNION CITY

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
1700 FARNAAM STREET
OMAHA, NE 68102
CROSSING AGREEMENT AREA:
3,275 S.F.

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

CROSSING AGREEMENT

BETWEEN UPRR AND

CITY OF UNION CITY
A.P. No. 087-0019-005-02
O.R.No. 55 D 542
ADDRESS: DUNCAN WAY

CITY ACQUISITION DEED
O.R. No.

SCALE: NTS DATE: 12/26/17
DRAWN: M.R. APPROVED SHEET NO.
2 OF 2
City Council/RSA Agenda 335 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT B
TO

PUBLIC AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AGREEMENT
SECTION 1. CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS
A. The Railroad makes no covenant or warranty of title for quiet possession or against encumbrances. The Political Body shall not use or permit use of the Crossing Area for any purposes other than those described in this Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing, the Political Body shall not use or permit use of the Crossing Area for railroad purposes, or for gas, oil or gasoline pipe lines. Any lines constructed on the Railroad's property by or under authority of the Political Body for the purpose of conveying electric power or communications incidental to the Political Body's use of the property as set forth herein shall be constructed in accordance with specifications and requirements of the Railroad, and in such manner as not adversely to affect communication or signal lines of the Railroad or its licensees now or hereafter located upon said property. No nonparty shall be admitted by the Political Body to use or occupy any part of the Railroad's property without the Railroad's written consent.

Nothing herein shall obligate the Railroad to give such consent.

B. The Railroad reserves the right to cross the Crossing Area with such railroad tracks as may be required for its convenience or purposes. In the event the Railroad shall place additional tracks upon the Crossing Area, the Political Body shall, at its sole cost and expense, modify the Pedestrian Improvements to conform with all tracks within the Crossing Area.

C. The rights hereby granted are subject to any existing encumbrances and rights (whether public or private), recorded or unrecorded, and also to any renewals thereof.

The Political Body shall not damage, destroy or interfere with the property or rights of nonparties in, upon or relating to the Railroad's property, unless the Political Body at its own expense settles with and obtains releases from such nonparties.

D. The Railroad reserves the right to use and to grant to others the right to use the Crossing Area for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights hereby granted, including, but not by way of limitation, the right to construct, reconstruct, maintain, operate, repair, alter, renew and replace tracks, facilities and appurtenances on the property; and the right to cross the Crossing Area with all kinds of equipment.

E. So far as it lawfully may do so, the Political Body will assume, bear and pay all taxes and assessments of whatsoever nature or kind (whether general, local or special) levied or assessed upon or against the Crossing Area, excepting taxes levied upon and against the property as a component part of the Railroad's operating property.

F. If any property or rights other than the rights hereby granted are necessary for 1 DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 336 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
the reconstruction, maintenance and use of the Crossing Area and/or the Pedestrian Improvements, or for the performance of any work in connection with the Project, the Political Body will acquire all such other property and rights at its own expense and without expense to the Railroad.

SECTION 2. CONSTRUCTION OF CROSSING AREA
A. The Political Body, at its expense, will apply for and obtain all public authority required by law, ordinance, rule or regulation for the Project, and will furnish the Railroad upon request with satisfactory evidence that such authority has been obtained.

B. Except as may be otherwise specifically provided herein, the Political Body, at its expense, will furnish all necessary labor, material and equipment, and shall construct and complete the Crossing Area and all appurtenances thereof (including the Pedestrian Improvements). The appurtenances shall include, without limitation, all necessary and proper highway warning devices (except those installed by the Railroad within its right of way) and all necessary drainage facilities, guard rails or barriers, and right of way fences between the Crossing Area and the Railroad's adjacent property and/or tracks, as applicable. Upon completion of the Project, the Political Body shall remove from the Railroad's property all temporary structures and false work, and will leave the Crossing Area and the Railroad's property in a condition satisfactory to the Railroad.

C. All construction work of the Political Body upon the Railroad's property (including, but not limited to, construction/reconstruction of the Crossing Area and all Pedestrian Improvements and all related and incidental work) shall be performed and completed in a manner satisfactory to the Assistant Vice President EngineeringDesign of the Railroad or his authorized representative and in compliance with the Plans, and other guidelines furnished by the Railroad.

D. All construction work of the Political Body contemplated by this Agreement shall be performed diligently and completed within a reasonable time. No part of the Project shall be suspended, discontinued or unduly delayed without the Railroad's written consent, and subject to such reasonable conditions as the Railroad may specify. It is understood that the Railroad's tracks at and in the vicinity of the work will be in constant or frequent use during progress of the work and that movement or stoppage of trains, engines or cars may cause delays in the work of the Political Body. The Political Body hereby assumes the risk of any such delays and agrees that no claims for damages on account of any delay shall be made against the Railroad by the Political Body and/or the Contractor.

SECTION 3. INJURY AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY
If the Political Body, in the performance of any work contemplated by this Agreement or by the failure to do or perform anything for which the Political Body is DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 337 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
responsible under the provisions of this Agreement, shall injure, damage or destroy any property of the Railroad or of any other person lawfully occupying or using the property of the Railroad, such property shall be replaced or repaired by the Political Body at the Political Body's own expense, or by the Railroad at the expense of the Political Body, and to the satisfaction of the Railroad's Assistant Vice President Engineering-Design.

SECTION 4. RAILROAD MAY USE CONTRACTORS TO PERFORM WORK The Railroad may contract for the performance of any of its work by other than railroad forces. The Railroad shall notify the Political Body of the contract price within ninety (90) days after it is awarded. Unless the Railroad's work is to be performed on a fixed price basis, the Political Body shall reimburse the Railroad for the amount of the contract.

SECTION 5. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS
A. The Political Body shall, at its own sole expense, maintain, repair, and renew, or cause to be maintained, repaired and renewed, the entire Crossing Area and Pedestrian Improvements, except the portions between the track tie ends, which shall be maintained by and at the expense of the Railroad.

B. If, in the future, the Political Body elects to have the surfacing material between the track tie ends, or between tracks if there is more than one railroad track across the Crossing Area, replaced with paving or some surfacing material other than timer planking, the Railroad, at the Political Body's expense, shall install such replacement surfacing, and in the future, to the extent repair or replacement of the surfacing is necessitated by repair or rehabilitation of the Railroad's tracks through the Crossing Area, the Political Body shall bear the expense of such repairs or replacement.

C. The Railroad shall maintain the automatic grade-crossing warning system, as applicable, located within the Crossing Area, and the Political Body and the Railroad agree that the Political Body shall pay for the cost of maintenance of any such automatic grade-crossing warning system.

SECTION 6. CHANGES IN GRADE
If at any time the Railroad shall elect, or be required by competent authority to, raise or lower the grade of all or any portion of the track(s) located within the Crossing Area, the Political Body shall, at its own expense, conform the Pedestrian Improvements to conform with the change of grade of the trackage.

SECTION 7. REARRANGEMENT OF WARNING DEVICES
If the change or rearrangement of any warning device installed hereunder is necessitated for public or Railroad convenience or on account of improvements for the DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 338 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Railroad, Pedestrian Improvements or both, the parties will apportion the expense incidental thereto between themselves by negotiation, agreement or by the order of a competent authority before the change or rearrangement is undertaken.

SECTION 8. SAFETY MEASURES; PROTECTION

OF RAILROAD COMPANY OPERATIONS
It is understood and recognized that safety and continuity of the Railroad's operations and communications are of the utmost importance; and in order that the same may be adequately safeguarded, protected and assured, and in order that accidents may be prevented and avoided, it is agreed with respect to all of said work of the Political Body that the work will be performed in a safe manner and in conformity with the following standards:

A. Definitions. All references in this Agreement to the Political Body shall also include the Contractor and their respective officers, agents and employees, and others acting under its or their authority; and all references in this Agreement to work of the Political Body shall include work both within and outside of the Railroad's property.

B. Entry on to Railroad's Property by Political Body. If the Political Body's employees need to enter the Railroad's property in order to perform an inspection of the Crossing Area and/or Pedestrian Improvements, minor maintenance or other activities related thereto, the Political Body shall first provide at least ten (10) working days advance notice to the Railroad representative. With respect to such entry on to Railroad's property, the Political Body, to the extent permitted by law, agrees to release, defend and indemnify the Railroad from and against any loss, damage, injury, liability, claim, cost or expense incurred by any person including, without limitation, the Political Body's employees, or damage to any property or equipment (collectively the "Loss") that arises from the presence or activities of Political Body's employees on the Railroad's property under this Paragraph B, except to the extent that any Loss is caused by the sole direct negligence of Railroad.

C. Flagging.
(i) If the Political Body's employees need to enter the Railroad's property as provided in Paragraph B above, the Political Body agrees to notify the Railroad representative at least thirty (30) working days in advance of proposed performance of any work by Political Body in which any person or equipment will be within twenty-five (25) feet of any track, or will be near enough to any track that any equipment extension (such as, but not limited to, a crane boom) will reach to within twenty-five (25) feet of any track. No work of any kind shall be performed, and no person, equipment, machinery, tool(s), material(s), vehicle(s), or thing(s) shall be located, operated, placed, or stored within twenty-five (25) feet of any of Railroad's track(s) at any time, for any reason, unless and until a Railroad flagman is provided to watch for trains. Upon receipt of such thirty (30) day notice, the Railroad representative will determine and inform Political Body whether a flagman needs be present and whether Political Body 4 DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 339 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
needs to implement any special protective or safety measures. If flagging or other special protective or safety measures are performed by Railroad, Railroad will bill Political Body for such expenses incurred by Railroad. If Railroad performs any flagging, or other special protective or safety measures are performed by Railroad, Political Body agrees that Political Body is not relieved of any of its responsibilities or liabilities set forth in this Agreement.
(ii) The rate of pay per hour for each flagman will be the prevailing hourly rate in effect for an eight-hour day for the class of flagmen used during regularly assigned hours and overtime in accordance with labor agreements and schedules in effect at the time the work is performed. In addition to the cost of such labor, a composite charge for vacation, holiday, health and welfare, supplemental sickness, Railroad Retirement and unemployment compensation, supplemental pension, Employees Liability and Property Damage and Administration will be included, computed on actual payroll. The composite charge will be the prevailing composite charge in effect at the time the work is performed. One and one-half times the current hourly rate is paid for overtime, Saturdays and Sundays, and two and one-half times current hourly rate for holidays.

Wage rates are subject to change, at any time, by law or by agreement between the Railroad and its employees, and may be retroactive as a result of negotiations or a ruling of an authorized governmental agency. Additional charges on labor are also subject to change. If the wage rate or additional charges are changed, the Political Body shall pay on the basis of the new rates and charges. (iii) Reimbursement to the Railroad will be required covering the full eight-hour day during which any flagman is furnished, unless the flagman can be assigned to other Railroad work during a portion of such day, in which event reimbursement will not be required for the portion of the day during which the flagman is engaged in other Railroad work. Reimbursement will also be required for any day not actually worked by the flagman following the flagman's assignment to work on the project for which the Railroad is required to pay the flagman and which could not reasonably be avoided by the Railroad by assignment of such flagman to other work, even though Political Body may not be working during such time. When it becomes necessary for the Railroad to bulletin and assign an employee to a flagging position in compliance with union collective bargaining agreements, Political Body must provide the Railroad a minimum of five (5) days notice prior to the cessation of the need for a flagman. If five (5) days notice of cessation is not given, Political Body will still be required to pay flagging charges for the five (5) day notice period required by union agreement to be given to the employee, even though flagging is not required for that period. An additional thirty (30) days notice must then be given to the Railroad if flagging services are needed again after such five (5) day cessation notice has been given to Railroad.

D. Compliance With Laws. The Political Body shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and enactments affecting the work. The Political Body shall use only such methods as are consistent with safety, both as concerns the Political Body, the Political Body's agents and employees, the officers, agents, employees and property of the Railroad and the public in general. The Political 5 DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 340 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Body (without limiting the generality of the foregoing) shall comply with all applicable state and federal occupational safety and health acts and regulations. All Federal Railroad Administration regulations shall be followed when work is performed on the Railroad's premises. If any failure by the Political Body to comply with any such laws, regulations, and enactments, shall result in any fine, penalty, cost or charge being assessed, imposed or charged against the Railroad, the Political Body shall reimburse, and to the extent it may lawfully do so, indemnify the Railroad for any such fine, penalty, cost, or charge, including without limitation attorney's fees, court costs and expenses. The Political Body further agrees in the event of any such action, upon notice thereof being provided by the Railroad, to defend such action free of cost, charge, or expense to the Railroad.

E. No Interference or Delays. The Political Body shall not do, suffer or permit anything which will or may obstruct, endanger, interfere with, hinder or delay maintenance or operation of the Railroad's tracks or facilities, or any communication or signal lines, installations or any appurtenances thereof, or the operations of others lawfully occupying or using the Railroad's property or facilities.

F. Supervision. The Political Body, at its own expense, shall adequately police and supervise all work to be performed by the Political Body, and shall not inflict injury to persons or damage to property for the safety of whom or of which the Railroad may be responsible, or to property of the Railroad. The responsibility of the Political Body for safe conduct and adequate policing and supervision of the Project shall not be lessened or otherwise affected by the Railroad's approval of any plans and specifications, or by the Railroad's collaboration in performance of any work, or by the presence at the work site of the Railroad's representatives, or by compliance by the Political Body with any requests or recommendations made by such representatives.

If a representative of the Railroad is assigned to the Project, the Political Body will give due consideration to suggestions and recommendations made by such representative for the safety and protection of the Railroad's property and operations.

G. Suspension of Work. If at any time the Political Body's engineers or the Vice President-Engineering Services of the Railroad or their respective representatives shall be of the opinion that any work of the Political Body is being or is about to be done or prosecuted without due regard and precaution for safety and security, the Political Body shall immediately suspend the work until suitable, adequate and proper protective measures are adopted and provided.

H. Removal of Debris. The Political Body shall not cause, suffer or permit material or debris to be deposited or cast upon, or to slide or fall upon any property or facilities of the Railroad; and any such material and debris shall be promptly removed from the Railroad's property by the Political Body at the Political Body's own expense or by the Railroad at the expense of the Political Body. The Political Body shall not cause, suffer or permit any snow to be plowed or cast upon the Railroad's property during snow removal from the Crossing Area.

DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 341 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
I. Explosives. The Political Body shall not discharge any explosives on or in the vicinity of the Railroad's property without the prior consent of the Railroad's Vice President-Engineering Services, which shall not be given if, in the sole discretion of the Railroad's Vice President-Engineering Services, such discharge would be dangerous or would interfere with the Railroad's property or facilities. For the purposes hereof, the "vicinity of the Railroad's property" shall be deemed to be any place on the Railroad's property or in such close proximity to the Railroad's property that the discharge of explosives could cause injury to the Railroad's employees or other persons, or cause damage to or interference with the facilities or operations on the Railroad's property. The Railroad reserves the right to impose such conditions, restrictions or limitations on the transportation, handling, storage, security and use of explosives as the Railroad, in the Railroad's sole discretion, may deem to be necessary, desirable or appropriate.

J. Excavation. The Political Body shall not excavate from existing slopes nor construct new slopes which are excessive and may create hazards of slides or falling rock, or impair or endanger the clearance between existing or new slopes and the tracks of the Railroad. The Political Body shall not do or cause to be done any work which will or may disturb the stability of any area or adversely affect the Railroad's tracks or facilities. The Political Body, at its own expense, shall install and maintain adequate shoring and cribbing for all excavation and/or trenching performed by the Political Body in connection with reconstruction, maintenance or other work. The shoring and cribbing shall be constructed and maintained with materials and in a manner approved by the Railroad's Assistant Vice President Engineering - Design to withstand all stresses likely to be encountered, including any stresses resulting from vibrations caused by the Railroad's operations in the vicinity.

K. Drainage. The Political Body, at the Political Body's own expense, shall provide and maintain suitable facilities for draining the Crossing Area and its appurtenances, and shall not suffer or permit drainage water therefrom to flow or collect upon property of the Railroad. The Political Body, at the Political Body's own expense, shall provide adequate passageway for the waters of any streams, bodies of water and drainage facilities (either natural or artificial, and including water from the Railroad's culvert and drainage facilities), so that said waters may not, because of any facilities or work of the Political Body, be impeded, obstructed, diverted or caused to back up, overflow or damage the property of the Railroad or any part thereof, or property of others. The Political Body shall not obstruct or interfere with existing ditches or drainage facilities.

L. Notice. Before commencing any work to be performed by the Political Body (as opposed to a Contractor), the Political Body shall provide the advance notice to the Railroad that is required under the CROE Agreement.

M. Fiber Optic Cables. Fiber optic cable systems may be buried on the Railroad's property. Protection of the fiber optic cable systems is of extreme importance since any break could disrupt service to users resulting in business interruption and loss of 7 DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 342 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
revenue and profits. Political Body shall telephone the Railroad during normal business hours (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Central Time, Monday through Friday, except holidays) at 1-800-336-9193 (also a 24-hour, 7-day number for emergency calls) to determine if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on the Railroad's premises to be used by the Political Body. If it is, Political Body will telephone the telecommunications connpany(ies) involved, arrange for a cable locator, and make arrangements for relocation or other protection of the fiber optic cable prior to beginning any work on the Railroad's premises.

SECTION 9. INTERIM WARNING DEVICES
If at anytime it is determined by a competent authority, by the Political Body, or by agreement between the parties, that new or improved train activated warning devices
should be installed at the Crossing Area, the Political Body shall install adequate temporary warning devices or signs and impose appropriate vehicular control measures to protect the motoring public until the new or improved devices have been installed.

SECTION 10. OTHER RAILROADS
All protective and indemnifying provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of the Railroad and any other railroad company lawfully using the Railroad's property or facilities.

SECTION 11. BOOKS AND RECORDS
The books, papers, records and accounts of Railroad, so far as they relate to the items of expense for the materials to be provided by Railroad under this Project, or are associated with the work to be performed by Railroad under this Project, shall be open to inspection and audit at Railroad's offices in Omaha, Nebraska, upon advance written notice delivered to the Railroad and during normal business hours by the agents and authorized representatives of the Political Body for a period of three (3) years following the date of the Railroad's last billing sent to the Political Body.

SECTION 12. REMEDIES FOR BREACH OR NONUSE
A. If the Political Body shall fail, refuse or neglect to perform and abide by the terms of this Agreement, the Railroad, in addition to any other rights and remedies, may perform any work which in the judgment of the Railroad is necessary to place the Crossing Area and/ or Pedestrian Improvements in such condition as will not menace, endanger or interfere with the Railroad's facilities or operations or jeopardize the Railroad's employees; and the Political Body will reimburse the Railroad for the expenses thereof.

B. Nonuse by the Political Body of the Crossing Area for the purposes set forth 8 DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 343 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
herein continuing at any time for a period of eighteen (18) months shall, at the option of the Railroad, work a termination of this Agreement and of all rights of the Political Body hereunder.

C. The Political Body will surrender peaceable possession of the Crossing Area and Pedestrian Improvements upon termination of this Agreement. Termination of this Agreement shall not affect any rights, obligations or liabilities of the parties, accrued or otherwise, which may have arisen prior to termination.

SECTION 13. MODIFICATION - ENTIRE AGREEMENT
No waiver, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing, signed by the Political Body and the Railroad and specifying with particularity the nature and extent of such waiver, modification or amendment. Any waiver by the Railroad of any default by the Political Body shall not affect or impair any right arising from any subsequent default. This Agreement and Exhibits attached hereto and made a part hereof constitute the entire understanding between the Political Body and the Railroad and cancel and supersede any prior negotiations, understandings or agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the work or any part thereof.

DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 344 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

AREMA UNIT STATEMENT OF RAILROAD HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING SIGNALS

ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS
PIDtt 101525
0 BUILDING AMERICAS

BY THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

STREET BART PED CROSSING

TOWN UNION CITY, CA
MILEPOST 27.08

SUBDIVISION OAKLAND
AAR/DOT NO. 859611R
WORK ORDER# 37978

DESCRIPTION UNIT VALUE QUANTITY UNITS
NON-CODED TRK. CIRCUIT, (Standalone AFTAC or Ring 10) 2 0 0 SUPERIMPOSED CIRCUIT(ArrAc) / DETECTION LOOP 2 0 0
HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING SIGNAL 2 4 8
(ONE PAIR OF FLASHING LIGHTS)
ADDITIONAL PAIR OF LIGHTS 1 4 4
GATE MECHANISM, AUTOMATIC 8 2 16
WITH ARM UP TO 26 FT
GATE MECHANISM, AUTOMATIC 10 0 0
WITH ARM OVER 26 FT
GCP/HXP (Constant warning device, per track circuit) 15 1 15 EXIT GATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RACK* 10 0 0
MOVEMENT DETECTOR (PMD) 6 0 0
MOVEMENT DETECTOR (STANDBY UNIT) 3 0 0
RADIO DATA LINK, PER UNIT 1 0 0
PREEMPTION CIRCUIT 2 0 0
DATA RECORDER 1 0 0
REMOTE MONITORING DEVICE* 2 1 2
BONDED RAIL JOINTS (per mile, each rail, single bonded) 1 0 0 BATTERY AND CHARGER (per set) 1 2 2
TOTAL UNIT COUNT 47
PAVEMENT RESTORATION COSTS (Actual)
Annual Maintenance Cost at $170/Unit $7,990
*UP supplied Unit Value
June 21,2017
City Council/RSA Agenda 345 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT C
TO

PUBLIC AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AGREEMENT
Exhibit C will be Railroad's Material and Force Agreement Estimate.

DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 346 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
DATE: 2019-04-17

ESTIMATE OF MATERIAL AND FORCE ACCOUNT WORK
BY THE

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
THIS ESTIMATE GOOD FOR 6 MONTHS EXPIRATION DATE IS :2019-10-17 DESCRIPTION OF WORK:

UNION CITY,CA / BART PED XING / DOT#859611R-1 / OAKLAND SUB / MP 27.08 INSTALL NEW 24 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ON EXISTING RAIL, INCLUDING TIES AND OTM.

PROJECT WAS BUILT USING FED ADDITIVE W/ OVERHEAD AND INDIRECT 234% UPRR WILL BE REIMBURSED FOR 100% OF COST TO INSTALL NEW CROSSING BY

THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
PID: 101524 AWO: MP,SUBDIV: 27.08, OAKLAND
SERVICE UNIT: 19 CITY: UNION CITY STATE: CA

DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT LABOR MATERIAL RECOLL UPRR TOTAL

ENGINEERING WORK
ENGINEERING 1838 1838 1838
FLAGGING 838 838 838
LABOR ADDITIVE 234% 8225 8225 8225
TRACK 838 838 838
TOTAL ENGINEERING 11739 11739 11739

SIGNAL WORK
LABOR ADDITIVE 234% 1259 1259 1259
SIGNAL 640 5 645 645
TOTAL SIGNAL 1899 5 1904 1904

TRACK & SURFACE WORK
BALAST 1.00 CL 1356 898 2254 2254
BILL PREP FEE 900 900 900
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT 10 10 10
FOREIGN LINE FREIGHT 329 329 329
HOMELINE FREIGHT 900 900 900
LABOR ADDITIVE 234% 37726 37726 37726
MATL STORE EXPENSE 309 309 309
0TH 8053 5819 13872 13872
RAIL LF 340 340 340
RDXING 24.00 TF 5424 3661 9085 9085
SALES TAX 550 550 550
TRK-SURF,LIN 4875 4875 4875
WELD 317 504 821 821
XTIE 26.00 EA 4201 2928 7129 7129
TOTAL TRACK & SURFACE 62292 16808 79100 79100
LABOR/MATERIAL EXPENSE 75930 16813
RECOLLECTIBLE/UPRR EXPENSE 92743 0

ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
THE ABOVE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATION. IN THE EVENT OF

AN INCREASE OR DECREASE IN THE COST OR QUANTITY OF MATERIAL OR LABOR REQUIRED, UPRR WILL BILL FOR ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS AT THE CURRENT EFFECTIVE RATE. 92743
City Council/RSA Agenda 347 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
EXHIBIT C-1 & C-2
TO

PUBLIC AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AGREEMENT
Exhibit C-1 will be Railroad's Material and Force Agreement Estimate.

DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 348 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Material And Force Account Estimate

UNION CITY
Estimate Creation Date: 6/21/2017 Number: 112387 Version: 2 Standard Rates: 190.39%
Estimate Good Until 12/28/19
Location: OAKLAND SUB, SIMN, 10.24-14
Buy America: No
Description of Work: UNION CITY, CA BART PEDESTRIAN CROSSING MP 27.08 OAKLAND SUB DOT#869611R WO#37978 PID#101525 100% RECOLLECTABLE
COMMENTS Description QTY UOM Unit LABOR MATERIAL TOTAL
Cost
SIGNAL
Xing -1 Irk CWE w/Gates 1 EA 131,584.00 41,200 90,384 131,584 Xing - Flasher/Pad (pair) 1 LS 57,560.00 16,000 41,560 57,560 Xing - Meter Service 1 LS 20,000.00 o 20,000 20,000
Xing - Fill/Rock/Gravel 1 LS 25,000.00 o 25,000 25,000
Xing - Boring 1 LS 10,000.00 o 10,000 10,000
Xing - Labor Additive 1 LS 116,690.00 116,690 o 116,690 Xing - Engineering Design 1 LS 4,089.00 4,089 o 4,089
Sub-Total = 177,979 186,944 364,923
Totals = 177,979 186,944 364,923
Grand Total =
Please Note: The above figures are estimates only and are subject to fluctuation. In the event of an increase or decrease in the cost or amount of material or labor required, UNION CITY will pay actual construction costs at the current rates effective thereof. $364,923
Thursday, March 28, 2019 City Council/RSA Agenda 349 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT C-2

ESTIMATE OF FORCE ACCOUNT WORK
BY THE

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Engineering and other related services for work to be performed within railroad right of way. Railroad flagging services, if applicable during construction activities in railroad right of way.

Project and construction management for installation of signal and surface work, including final inspection and filing Form G with California Public Utility Commission.

DATE:
4/17/2019
SERVICE UNIT:

Northern CA
STATE:

CA
LOCATION:

Union City, CA

DESCRIPTION LABOR MATERIAL TOTAL

ENGINEERING
Project Management $ 2,000 $ - $ 2,000
Construction Management $ 7,000 $ $ 7,000
Final Inspection $ 1,000 $ - $ 1,500
CROSSING REMOVAL, DOT #834187C
Signal $ 16,000 $ 17,000
Track $ 14,000 $ 15,000

FLAGGING / INSPECTION SERVICES
RATE (per day) 1,500
Estimated It Days of Flagging 5 $ 7,500 $ $7,500
TOTAL PROJECT: $ 17,500 $ $50,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $50,000
THE ABOVE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATION.

IN THE EVENT OF AN INCREASE OR DECREASE IN THE COST OR QUANTITY OF

MATERIAL OR LABOR REQUIRED, THE RAILROAD WILL BILL FOR ACTUAL COSTS AT THE CURRENT RATES EFFECTIVE THEREOF.

City Council/RSA Agenda 350 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT D
TO

PUBLIC AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AGREEMENT

FORM OF CONTRACTOR'S

RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT
DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 351 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Contractor's Right of Entry (Private Flagging Contractor) 3055-45 Form Approved - UPRR Law Dept 03/09/2017

CONTRACTOR'S

RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of , 2019, by and between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("Railroad"); and , a corporation ("Contractor").

RECITALS:

Contractor has been hired by the by the City of Union City ("City") to construction of a new public at-grade pedestrian crossing area over the Railroad's track(s) at or near Railroad's Milepost 27.08 (DOT No. 859611R) on Railroad's Oakland Subdivision at or near Union City, Alameda County, California, as such location is in the general location shown on the prints marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, which work is the subject of an agreement dated , 2019, between Railroad and the City.

Railroad is willing to permit Contractor to perform the work described above at the location described above subject to the terms and conditions contained in this agreement AGREEMENT:

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between Railroad and Contractor, as follows:

ARTICLE 1 - DEFINITION OF CONTRACTOR.

For purposes of this agreement, all references in this agreement to Contractor shall include Contractor's contractors, subcontractors, officers, agents and employees, and others acting under its or their authority. For purposes of clarity, Contractor agrees that any CIC (defined below) hired by Contractor is a subcontractor of Contractor and therefore included in the defined term Contractor pursuant to the foregoing sentence.

ARTICLE 2- RIGHT GRANTED; PURPOSE.

Railroad hereby grants to Contractor the right, during the term hereinafter stated and upon and subject to each and all of the terms, provisions and conditions herein contained, to enter upon and have ingress to and egress from the property described in the Recitals for the purpose of performing the work described in the Recitals above. The right herein granted to Contractor is limited to those portions of Railroad's property specifically described herein, or as designated by the Railroad Representative named in Article 4.

ARTICLE 3 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN EXHIBITS B, C AND D.

The terms and conditions contained in Exhibit B, Exhibit C and Exhibit D, attached hereto, are hereby made a part of this agreement.

ARTICLE 4- ALL EXPENSES TO BE BORNE BY CONTRACTOR; RAILROAD REPRESENTATIVE.

A. Contractor shall bear any and all costs and expenses associated with any work performed by Contractor (including without limitation any CIC), or any costs or expenses incurred by Railroad relating to this agreement. 1 City Council/RSA Agenda 352 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Contractor's Right of Entry (Private Flagging Contractor) 3055-45 Form Approved - UPRR Law Dept 03/09/2017
B. Contractor shall coordinate all of its work with the following Railroad representative or his or her duly authorized representative (the "Railroad Representative"):

Robert Mendoza
Manager Track Mntnc.
510-268-3052
[email protected]
C. Contractor, at its own expense, shall adequately police and supervise all work to be performed by Contractor and shall ensure that such work is performed in a safe manner as set forth in Section 7 of Exhibit B. The responsibility of Contractor for safe conduct and adequate policing and supervision of Contractor's work shall not be lessened or otherwise affected by Railroad's approval of plans and specifications involving the work, or by Railroad's collaboration in performance of any work, or by the presence at the work site of a Railroad Representative, or by compliance by Contractor with any requests or recommendations made by Railroad Representative.

ARTICLE 5- SCHEDULE OF WORK ON A MONTHLY BASIS.

The Contractor, at its expense, shall provide on a monthly basis a detailed schedule of work to the Railroad Representative named in Article 4B above. The reports shall start at the execution of this agreement and continue until this agreement is terminated as provided in this agreement or until the Contractor has completed all work on Railroad's property.

ARTICLE 6 - TERM; TERMINATION.

A. The grant of right herein made to Contractor shall commence on the date of this agreement, and continue until , unless sooner terminated as herein provided, or at such time as Contractor has completed its work on Railroad's property, whichever is earlier. Contractor agrees to notify the Railroad Representative in writing when it has completed its work on Railroad's property.

B. This agreement may be terminated by either party on ten (10) days written notice to the other party.

ARTICLE 7- CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE.

A. Before commencing any work, contractor will provide Railroad with the (i) insurance binders, policies, certificates and endorsements set forth in Exhibit C of this agreement, and (ii) the insurance endorsements obtained by each subcontractor as required under Section 12 of Exhibit B of this agreement.

B. All insurance correspondence, binders, policies, certificates and endorsements shall be sent to:

Union Pacific Railroad Company
1400 Douglas STOP 1690
Omaha, NE 68179
Folder 3153-24
ARTICLE 8 - PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING.

If the work to be performed by the Contractor will involve the Railroad providing any flagging protection (or if a CIC is approved to provide flagging protection pursuant to the terms set forth herein) and/or there is separate work to be performed by the Railroad, the Contractor confirms that no work shall commence until the Railroad and Contractor participate in a preconstruction meeting involving flagging procedures and coordination of work activities of the Contractor and the Railroad (and any CIC, as applicable.)
2 City Council/RSA Agenda 353 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Contractor's Right of Entry (Private Flagging Contractor) 3055-45 Form Approved - UPRR Law Dept 03/09/2017
ARTICLE 9. DISMISSAL OF CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEE.

At the request of Railroad, Contractor shall remove from Railroad's property any employee of Contractor who fails to conform to the instructions of the Railroad Representative in connection with the work on Railroad's property, and any right of Contractor shall be suspended until such removal has occurred. Contractor shall indemnify Railroad against any claims arising from the removal of any such employee from Railroad's property.

ARTICLE 10. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE.

Upon the execution and delivery of this agreement, Contractor shall pay to Railroad ($1025.00) as reimbursement for clerical, administrative and handling expenses in connection with the processing of this agreement.

ARTICLE 11. CROSSINGS; COMPLIANCE WITH MUTCD AND FRA GUIDELINES.

A. No additional vehicular crossings (including temporary haul roads) or pedestrian crossings over Railroad's trackage shall be installed or used by Contractor without the prior written permission of Railroad.

B. Any permanent or temporary changes, including temporary traffic control, to crossings must conform to the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and any applicable Federal Railroad Administration rules, regulations and guidelines, and must be reviewed by the Railroad prior to any changes being implemented. In the event the Railroad is found to be out of compliance with federal safety regulations due to the Contractor's modifications, negligence, or any other reason arising from the Contractor's presence on the Railroad's property, the Contractor agrees to assume liability for any civil penalties imposed upon the Railroad for such noncompliance.

ARTICLE 12.- EXPLOSIVES.

Explosives or other highly flammable substances shall not be stored or used on Railroad's property without the prior written approval of Railroad.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this agreement in duplicate as of the date first herein written.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
By:

Title:
(Name of Contractor)
By:

Title:
3 City Council/RSA Agenda 354 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT A
TO

CONTRACTOR'S RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT
Exhibit A will be a print showing the general location of the work site.

City Council/RSA Agenda 355 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT B
TO

CONTRACTOR'S RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT
Section 1. NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF WORK - RAILROAD FLAGGING - PRIVATE FLAGGING.

A. Contractor agrees to notify the Railroad Representative at least ten (10) working days in advance of Contractor commencing its work and at least thirty (30) working days in advance of proposed performance of any work by Contractor in which any person or equipment will be within twenty-five (25) feet of any track, or will be near enough to any track that any equipment extension (such as, but not limited to, a crane boom) will reach to within twenty-five (25) feet of any track.

B. No work of any kind shall be performed, and no person, equipment, machinery, tool(s), material(s), vehicle(s), or thing(s) shall be located, operated, placed, or stored within twenty-five (25) feet of any of Railroad's track(s) at any time, for any reason, unless and until a Railroad approved flagman is provided to watch for trains. Upon receipt of such thirty (30)-day notice, the Railroad Representative will determine and inform Contractor whether a flagman need be present and whether Contractor needs to implement any special protective or safety measures.

C. Contractor shall be permitted to hire a private contractor to perform flagging or other special protective or safety measures (such private contractor being commonly known in the railroad industry as a contractor-in-charge ("CIC")) in lieu of Railroad providing such services or in concert with Railroad providing such services, subject to prior written approval by Railroad, which approval shall be in Railroad's sole and absolute discretion. If Railroad agrees to permit Contractor to utilize a CIC pursuant to the preceding sentence, Contractor shall obtain Railroad's prior approval in writing for each of the following items, as determined in all respects in Railroad's sole and absolute discretion: (i) the identity of the third-party performing the role of CIC; (ii) the scope of the services to be performed for the project by the approved CIC; and (iii) any other terms and conditions governing such services to be provided by the CIC. If flagging or other special protective or safety measures are performed by an approved CIC, Contractor shall be solely responsible for (and shall timely pay such CIC for) its services. Railroad reserves the right to rescind any approval pursuant to this Section 1, Subsection C., in whole or in part, at any time, as determined in Railroad's sole and absolute discretion.

D. If any flagging or other special protective or safety measures are performed by employees of Railroad and/or any contractor of Railroad, Railroad will bill Contractor for such expenses incurred by Railroad, unless Railroad and a federal, state or local governmental entity have agreed that Railroad is to bill such expenses to the federal, state or local governmental entity. If Railroad will be sending the bills to Contractor, Contractor shall pay such bills within thirty (30) days of Contractor's receipt of billing.

E. If any flagging or other special protective or safety measures are performed by Railroad or a CIC, Contractor agrees that Contractor is not relieved of any of its responsibilities or liabilities set forth in this agreement.

F. The provisions set forth in this subsection are only applicable for Flagging Services performed by employees of Railroad: the rate of pay per hour for each flagman will be the prevailing hourly rate in effect for an eighthour day for the class of flagmen used during regularly assigned hours and overtime in accordance with labor agreements and schedules in effect at the time the work is performed. In addition to the cost of such labor, a composite charge for vacation, holiday, health and welfare, supplemental sickness, Railroad Retirement and unemployment compensation, supplemental pension, Employees Liability and Property Damage and Administration will be included, computed on actual payroll. The composite charge will be the prevailing composite charge in effect at the time the work is performed. One and one-half times the current hourly rate is paid for overtime, Saturdays and Sundays, and two and one-half times current hourly rate for holidays. Wage rates are subject to change, at any time, by law or by agreement between Railroad and its employees, and may be retroactive as a result of negotiations or a ruling of an authorized governmental agency.

Additional charges on labor are also subject to change. If the wage rate or additional charges are changed, Contractor (or the governmental entity, as applicable) shall pay on the basis of the new rates and charges. If flagging is performed by Railroad, reimbursement to Railroad will be required covering the full eight-hour day during which any flagman is furnished, unless the flagman can be assigned to other Railroad work during a portion of such day, in which event reimbursement will not be required for the portion of the day during which the flagman is engaged in other Railroad work.

City Council/RSA Agenda 356 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Reimbursement will also be required for any day not actually worked by the flagman following the flagman's assignment to work on the project for which Railroad is required to pay the flagman and which could not reasonably be avoided by Railroad by assignment of such flagman to other work, even though Contractor may not be working during such time.

When it becomes necessary for Railroad to bulletin and assign an employee to a flagging position in compliance with union collective bargaining agreements, Contractor must provide Railroad a minimum of five (5) days notice prior to the cessation of the need for a flagman. If five (5) days notice of cessation is not given, Contractor will still be required to pay flagging charges for the five (5) day notice period required by union agreement to be given to the employee, even though flagging is not required for that period. An additional thirty (30) days notice must then be given to Railroad if flagging services are needed again after such five day cessation notice has been given to Railroad.

Section 2. LIMITATION AND SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS GRANTED A. The foregoing grant of right is subject and subordinate to the prior and continuing right and obligation of the Railroad to use and maintain its entire property including the right and power of Railroad to construct, maintain, repair, renew, use, operate, change, modify or relocate railroad tracks, roadways, signal, communication, fiber optics, or other wirelines, pipelines and other facilities upon, along or across any or all parts of its property, all or any of which may be freely done at any time or times by Railroad without liability to Contractor or to any other party for compensation or damages.

B. The foregoing grant is also subject to all outstanding superior rights (whether recorded or unrecorded and including those in favor of licensees and lessees of Railroad's property, and others) and the right of Railroad to renew and extend the same, and is made without covenant of title or for quiet enjoyment.

Section 3. NO INTERFERENCE WITH OPERATIONS OF RAILROAD AND ITS TENANTS.

A. Contractor shall conduct its operations so as not to interfere with the continuous and uninterrupted use and operation of the railroad tracks and property of Railroad, including without limitation, the operations of Railroad's lessees, licensees or others, unless specifically authorized in advance by the Railroad Representative. Nothing shall be done or permitted to be done by Contractor at any time that would in any manner impair the safety of such operations.

When not in use, Contractor's machinery and materials shall be kept at least fifty (50) feet from the centerline of Railroad's nearest track, and there shall be no vehicular crossings of Railroads tracks except at existing open public crossings.

B. Operations of Railroad and work performed by Railroad personnel and delays in the work to be performed by Contractor caused by such railroad operations and work are expected by Contractor, and Contractor agrees that Railroad shall have no liability to Contractor, or any other person or entity for any such delays. The Contractor shall coordinate its activities with those of Railroad and third parties so as to avoid interference with railroad operations. The safe operation of Railroad train movements and other activities by Railroad takes precedence over any work to be performed by Contractor.

Section 4. LIENS.

Contractor shall pay in full all persons who perform labor or provide materials for the work to be performed by Contractor. Contractor shall not create, permit or suffer any mechanic's or materialmen's liens of any kind or nature to be created or enforced against any property of Railroad for any such work performed. Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Railroad from and against any and all liens, claims, demands, costs or expenses of whatsoever nature in any way connected with or growing out of such work done, labor performed, or materials furnished. If Contractor fails to promptly cause any lien to be released of record, Railroad may, at its election, discharge the lien or claim of lien at Contractor's expense.

Section 5. PROTECTION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLE SYSTEMS.

A. Fiber optic cable systems may be buried on Railroad's property. Protection of the fiber optic cable systems is of extreme importance since any break could disrupt service to users resulting in business interruption and loss of revenue and profits. Contractor shall telephone Railroad during normal business hours (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.

Central Time, Monday through Friday, except holidays) at 1-800-336-9193 (also a 24-hour, 7-day number for emergency calls) to determine if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on Railroad's property to be used by Contractor. If it is, City Council/RSA Agenda 357 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Contractor will telephone the telecommunications company(ies) involved, make arrangements for a cable locator and, if applicable, for relocation or other protection of the fiber optic cable. Contractor shall not commence any work until all such protection or relocation (if applicable) has been accomplished.

B. IN ADDITION TO OTHER INDEMNITY PROVISIONS IN THIS AGREEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL

INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD RAILROAD HARMLESS FROM AND AGAINST ALL COSTS, LIABILITY AND

EXPENSE WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ATTORNEYS FEES, COURT COSTS AND

EXPENSES) ARISING OUT OF ANY ACT OR OMISSION OF CONTRACTOR, ITS AGENTS AND/OR EMPLOYEES, THAT CAUSES OR CONTRIBUTES TO (1) ANY DAMAGE TO OR DESTRUCTION OF ANY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ON RAILROAD'S PROPERTY, AND/OR (2) ANY INJURY TO OR DEATH OF ANY PERSON EMPLOYED BY

OR ON BEHALF OF ANY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, AND/OR ITS CONTRACTOR, AGENTS AND/OR EMPLOYEES, ON RAILROAD'S PROPERTY. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT HAVE OR SEEK RECOURSE AGAINST

RAILROAD FOR ANY CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION FOR ALLEGED LOSS OF PROFITS OR REVENUE OR LOSS

OF SERVICE OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE TO A TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY USING

RAILROAD'S PROPERTY OR A CUSTOMER OR USER OF SERVICES OF THE FIBER OPTIC CABLE ON RAILROAD'S PROPERTY.

Section 6. PERMITS - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS.

In the prosecution of the work covered by this agreement, Contractor shall secure any and all necessary permits and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and enactments affecting the work including, without limitation, all applicable Federal Railroad Administration regulations.

Section 7. SAFETY.

A. Safety of personnel, property, rail operations and the public is of paramount importance in the prosecution of the work performed by Contractor. Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety, operations and programs in connection with the work. Contractor shall at a minimum comply with Railroad's safety standards listed in Exhibit D, hereto attached, to ensure uniformity with the safety standards followed by Railroad's own forces. As a part of Contractor's safety responsibilities, Contractor shall notify Railroad if Contractor determines that any of Railroad's safety standards are contrary to good safety practices. Contractor shall furnish copies of Exhibit D to each of its employees before they enter the job site.

B. Without limitation of the provisions of paragraph A above, Contractor shall keep the job site free from safety and health hazards and ensure that its employees are competent and adequately trained in all safety and health aspects of the job.

C. Contractor shall have proper first aid supplies available on the job site so that prompt first aid services may be provided to any person injured on the job site. Contractor shall promptly notify Railroad of any U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration reportable injuries. Contractor shall have a nondelegable duty to control its employees while they are on the job site or any other property of Railroad, and to be certain they do not use, be under the influence of, or have in their possession any alcoholic beverage, drug or other substance that may inhibit the safe performance of any work.

D. If and when requested by Railroad, Contractor shall deliver to Railroad a copy of Contractor's safety plan for conducting the work (the "Safety Plan"). Railroad shall have the right, but not the obligation, to require Contractor to correct any deficiencies in the Safety Plan. The terms of this agreement shall control if there are any inconsistencies between this agreement and the Safety Plan.

Section 8. INDEMNITY.

A. TO THE EXTENT NOT PROHIBITED BY APPLICABLE STATUTE, CONTRACTOR SHALL

INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS RAILROAD, ITS AFFILIATES, AND ITS AND THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES (INDIVIDUALLY AN "INDEMNIFIED PARTY" OR COLLECTIVELY "INDEMNIFIED PARTIES") FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY, LIABILITY, CLAIM, DEMAND, COST OR

EXPENSE (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ATTORNEY'S, CONSULTANT'S AND EXPERT'S FEES, AND City Council/RSA Agenda 358 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
COURT COSTS), FINE OR PENALTY (COLLECTIVELY, "LOSS") INCURRED BY ANY PERSON (INCLUDING,

WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY, CONTRACTOR, OR ANY EMPLOYEE OF CONTRACTOR OR

OF ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY) ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY MANNER CONNECTED WITH (I) ANY WORK

PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR, OR (II) ANY ACT OR OMISSION OF CONTRACTOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, OR (III) ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY CONTRACTOR.

B. THE RIGHT TO INDEMNITY UNDER THIS SECTION 8 SHALL ACCRUE UPON OCCURRENCE OF

THE EVENT GIVING RISE TO THE LOSS, AND SHALL APPLY REGARDLESS OF ANY NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT

LIABILITY OF ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY, EXCEPT WHERE THE LOSS IS CAUSED BY THE SOLE ACTIVE

NEGLIGENCE OF AN INDEMNIFIED PARTY AS ESTABLISHED BY THE FINAL JUDGMENT OF A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION. THE SOLE ACTIVE NEGLIGENCE OF ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY SHALL NOT BAR THE RECOVERY OF ANY OTHER INDEMNIFIED PARTY.

C. CONTRACTOR EXPRESSLY AND SPECIFICALLY ASSUMES POTENTIAL LIABILITY UNDER THIS SECTION 8 FOR CLAIMS OR ACTIONS BROUGHT BY CONTRACTOR'S OWN EMPLOYEES. CONTRACTOR

WAIVES ANY IMMUNITY IT MAY HAVE UNDER WORKER'S COMPENSATION OR INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE ACTS TO INDEMNIFY THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES UNDER THIS SECTION 8. CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THIS WAIVER WAS MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED BY THE PARTIES HERETO.

D. NO COURT OR JURY FINDINGS IN ANY EMPLOYEE'S SUIT PURSUANT TO ANY WORKER'S

COMPENSATION ACT OR THE FEDERAL EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT AGAINST A PARTY TO THIS

AGREEMENT MAY BE RELIED UPON OR USED BY CONTRACTOR IN ANY ATTEMPT TO ASSERT LIABILITY AGAINST ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY.

E. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION 8 SHALL SURVIVE THE COMPLETION OF ANY WORK PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR OR THE TERMINATION OR EXPIRATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THIS SECTION 8 OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BE DEEMED TO LIMIT ANY LIABILITY CONTRACTOR MAY HAVE TO ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY BY STATUTE OR UNDER COMMON LAW.

Section 9. RESTORATION OF PROPERTY.

In the event Railroad authorizes Contractor to take down any fence of Railroad or in any manner move or disturb any of the other property of Railroad in connection with the work to be performed by Contractor, then in that event Contractor shall, as soon as possible and at Contractor's sole expense, restore such fence and other property to the same condition as the same were in before such fence was taken down or such other property was moved or disturbed.

Contractor shall remove all of Contractor's tools, equipment, rubbish and other materials from Railroad's property promptly upon completion of the work, restoring Railroad's property to the same state and condition as when Contractor entered thereon.

Section 10. WAIVER OF DEFAULT.

Waiver by Railroad of any breach or default of any condition, covenant or agreement herein contained to be kept, observed and performed by Contractor shall in no way impair the right of Railroad to avail itself of any remedy for any subsequent breach or default.

Section 11. MODIFICATION - ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

No modification of this agreement shall be effective unless made in writing and signed by Contractor and Railroad. This agreement and the exhibits attached hereto and made a part hereof constitute the entire understanding between Contractor and Railroad and cancel and supersede any prior negotiations, understandings or agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the work to be performed by Contractor.

Section 12. ASSIGNMENT - SUBCONTRACTING.

Contractor shall not assign or subcontract this agreement, or any interest therein, without the written consent of the Railroad. Contractor shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of all subcontractors. Before Contractor City Council/RSA Agenda 359 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
commences any work, the Contractor shall, except to the extent prohibited by law; (1) require each of its subcontractors to include the Contractor as "Additional Insured" on the subcontractor's Commercial General Liability policy and Umbrella or Excess policies (if applicable) with respect to all liabilities arising out of the subcontractor's performance of work on behalf of the Contractor by endorsing these policies with ISO Additional Insured Endorsements CG 20 10, and CG 20 37 (or substitute forms providing equivalent coverage; (2) require each of its subcontractors to endorse their Commercial General Liability Policy with "Contractual Liability Railroads" ISO Form CG 24 17 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) for the job site; and (3) require each of its subcontractors to endorse their Business Automobile Policy with "Coverage For Certain Operations In Connection With Railroads" ISO Form CA 20 70 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) for the job site.

City Council/RSA Agenda 360 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT C
TO

CONTRACTOR'S

RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Insurance Provisions For
Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement
Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain during the course of the Project and until all Project work on Railroad's property has been completed and the Contractor has removed all equipment and materials from Railroad's property and has cleaned and restored Railroad's property to Railroad's satisfaction, the following insurance coverage:

A. Commercial General Liability insurance. Commercial general liability (CGL) with a limit of not less than $5,000,000 each occurrence and an aggregate limit of not less than $10,000,000. CGL insurance must be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 12 04 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage).

The policy must also contain the following endorsement, which must be stated on the certificate of insurance:
• Contractual Liability Railroads ISO form CG 24 17 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) showing "Union Pacific Railroad Company Property" as the Designated Job Site. • Designated Construction Project(s) General Aggregate Limit ISO Form CG 25 03 03 97 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) showing the project on the form schedule.

B. Business Automobile Coverage insurance. Business auto coverage written on ISO form CA 00 01 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage) with a combined single limit of not less $5,000,000 for each accident and coverage must include liability arising out of any auto (including owned, hired and non-owned autos).

The policy must contain the following endorsements, which must be stated on the certificate of insurance:
• Coverage For Certain Operations In Connection With Railroads ISO form CA 20 70 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) showing "Union Pacific Property" as the Designated Job Site. • Motor Carrier Act Endorsement - Hazardous materials clean up (MCS-90) if required by law.

C. Workers Compensation and Employers' Liability insurance. Coverage must include but not be limited to:
• Contractor's statutory liability under the workers' compensation laws of the state where the work is being performed.
• Employers' Liability (Part B) with limits of at least $500,000 each accident, $500,000 disease policy limit $500,000 each employee.

If Contractor is self-insured, evidence of state approval and excess workers compensation coverage must be provided. Coverage must include liability arising out of the U. S. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Act, the Jones Act, and the Outer Continental Shelf Land Act, if applicable.

D. Railroad Protective Liability insurance. Contractor must maintain "Railroad Protective Liability" (RPL) insurance written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 35 12 04 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) on behalf of Railroad as named insured, with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and an aggregate of $6,000,000. The definition of "JOB LOCATION" and "WORK" on the declaration page of the policy shall refer to this agreement and shall describe all WORK or OPERATIONS performed under this agreement. Contractor shall provide this agreement to Contractor's insurance agent(s) and/or broker(s) and Contractor shall instruct such agent(s) and/or broker(s) to procure the insurance coverage required by this agreement. A BINDER STATING

THE POLICY IS IN PLACE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO RAILROAD BEFORE THE WORK MAY COMMENCE AND UNTIL THE ORIGINAL POLICY IS FORWARDED TO UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD.

City Council/RSA Agenda 361 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
E. Umbrella or Excess insurance. If Contractor utilizes umbrella or excess policies, these policies must "follow form" and afford no less coverage than the primary policy.

F. Pollution Liability insurance. Pollution liability coverage must be included when the scope of the work as defined in the agreement includes installation, temporary storage, or disposal of any "hazardous" material that is injurious in or upon land, the atmosphere, or any watercourses; or may cause bodily injury at any time.

If required, coverage may be provided in separate policy form or by endorsement to Contractors CGL or RPL.

Any form coverage must be equivalent to that provided in ISO form CG 24 15 "Limited Pollution Liability Extension Endorsement" or CG 28 31 "Pollution Exclusion Amendment" with limits of at least $5,000,000 per occurrence and an aggregate limit of $10,000,000.

If the scope of work as defined in this agreement includes the disposal of any hazardous or non-hazardous materials from the job site, Contractor must furnish to Railroad evidence of pollution legal liability insurance maintained by the disposal site operator for losses arising from the insured facility accepting the materials, with coverage in minimum amounts of $1,000,000 per loss, and an annual aggregate of $2,000,000.

Other Requirements
G. All policy(ies) required above (except business automobile, worker's compensation and employers liability) must include Railroad as "Additional Insured" using ISO Additional Insured Endorsements CG 20 10, and CG 20 37 (or substitute forms providing equivalent coverage). The coverage provided to Railroad as additional insured shall not be limited by Contractor's liability under the indemnity provisions of this agreement. BOTH CONTRACTOR

AND RAILROAD EXPECT THAT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE

BROADEST POSSIBLE COVERAGE AVAILABLE BY OPERATION OF LAW UNDER ISO ADDITIONAL INSURED FORMS CG 20 10 AND CG 20 37.

H. Punitive damages exclusion, if any, must be deleted (and the deletion indicated on the certificate of insurance), unless (a) insurance coverage may not lawfully be obtained for any punitive damages that may arise under this agreement, or (b) all punitive damages are prohibited by all states in which this agreement will be performed.

Contractor waives all rights of recovery, and its insurers also waive all rights of subrogation of damages against Railroad and its agents, officers, directors and employees for damages covered by the workers compensation and employers liability or commercial umbrella or excess liability obtained by Contractor required in this agreement where prohibited by law. This waiver must be stated on the certificate of insurance.

J. Prior to commencing the work, Contractor shall furnish Railroad with a certificate(s) of insurance, executed by a duly authorized representative of each insurer, showing compliance with the insurance requirements in this agreement.

K. All insurance policies must be written by a reputable insurance company acceptable to Railroad or with a current Best's Insurance Guide Rating of A- and Class VII or better, and authorized to do business in the state where the work is being performed.

L. The fact that insurance is obtained by Contractor or by Railroad on behalf of Contractor will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Contractor, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this agreement. Damages recoverable by Railroad from Contractor or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage.

City Council/RSA Agenda 362 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT D
TO

CONTRACTOR'S RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT

MINIMUM SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
The term "employees" as used herein refer to all employees of Contractor as well as all employees of any subcontractor or agent of Contractor.

I. Clothing
A. All employees of Contractor will be suitably dressed to perform their duties safely and in a manner that will not interfere with their vision, hearing, or free use of their hands or feet.

Specifically, Contractor's employees must wear:
(i) Waist-length shirts with sleeves.
(ii) Trousers that cover the entire leg. If flare-legged trousers are worn, the trouser bottoms must be tied to prevent catching.
(iii) Footwear that covers their ankles and has a defined heel. Employees working on bridges are required to wear safety-toed footwear that conforms to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and FRA footwear requirements.

B. Employees shall not wear boots (other than work boots), sandals, canvas-type shoes, or other shoes that have thin soles or heels that are higher than normal.

C. Employees must not wear loose or ragged clothing, neckties, finger rings, or other loose jewelry while operating or working on machinery.

Personal Protective Equipment
Contractor shall require its employees to wear personal protective equipment as specified by Railroad rules, regulations, or recommended or requested by the Railroad Representative. (i) Hard hat that meets the American National Standard (ANSI) Z89.1 — latest revision. Hard hats should be affixed with Contractor's company logo or name.
(ii) Eye protection that meets American National Standard (ANSI) for occupational and educational eye and face protection, Z87.1 — latest revision. Additional eye protection must be provided to meet specific job situations such as welding, grinding, etc.
(iii) Hearing protection, which affords enough attenuation to give protection from noise levels that will be occurring on the job site. Hearing protection, in the form of plugs or muffs, must be worn when employees are within:
100 feet of a locomotive or roadway/work equipment
15 feet of power operated tools
150 feet of jet blowers or pile drivers
150 feet of retarders in use (when within 10 feet, employees must wear dual ear protection — plugs and muffs)
(iv) Other types of personal protective equipment, such as respirators, fall protection equipment, and face shields, must be worn as recommended or requested by the Railroad Representative.

City Council/RSA Agenda 363 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
III. On Track Safety
Contractor is responsible for compliance with the Federal Railroad Administration's Roadway Worker Protection regulations — 49CFR214, Subpart C and Railroad's On-Track Safety rules. Under 49CFR214, Subpart C, railroad contractors are responsible for the training of their employees on such regulations. In addition to the instructions contained in Roadway Worker Protection regulations, all employees must:

Maintain a distance of twenty-five (25) feet to any track unless the Railroad Representative is present to authorize movements.
(ii) Wear an orange, reflectorized workwear approved by the Railroad Representative. (iii) Participate in a job briefing that will specify the type of On-Track Safety for the type of work being performed. Contractor must take special note of limits of track authority, which tracks may or may not be fouled, and clearing the track. Contractor will also receive special instructions relating to the work zone around machines and minimum distances between machines while working or traveling.

IV. Equipment
A. It is the responsibility of Contractor to ensure that all equipment is in a safe condition to operate. If, in the opinion of the Railroad Representative, any of Contractor's equipment is unsafe for use, Contractor shall remove such equipment from Railroad's property. In addition, Contractor must ensure that the operators of all equipment are properly trained and competent in the safe operation of the equipment. In addition, operators must be:

Familiar and comply with Railroad's rules on lockoutitagout of equipment.

Trained in and comply with the applicable operating rules if operating any hy-rail equipment ontrack.

Trained in and comply with the applicable air brake rules if operating any equipment that moves rail cars or any other railbound equipment.

B. All self-propelled equipment must be equipped with a first-aid kit, fire extinguisher, and audible back-up warning device.

C. Unless otherwise authorized by the Railroad Representative, all equipment must be parked a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any track. Before leaving any equipment unattended, the operator must stop the engine and properly secure the equipment against movement.

D. Cranes must be equipped with three orange cones that will be used to mark the working area of the crane and the minimum clearances to overhead powerlines.

V. General Safety Requirements
A. Contractor shall ensure that all waste is properly disposed of in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations.

B. Contractor shall ensure that all employees participate in and comply with a job briefing conducted by the Railroad Representative, if applicable. During this briefing, the Railroad Representative will specify safe work procedures, (including On-Track Safety) and the potential hazards of the job. If any employee has any questions or concerns about the work, the employee must voice them during the job briefing.

Additional job briefings will be conducted during the work as conditions, work procedures, or personnel change.

C. All track work performed by Contractor meets the minimum safety requirements established by the Federal Railroad Administration's Track Safety Standards 49CFR213.

D. All employees comply with the following safety procedures when working around any railroad track:

City Council/RSA Agenda 364 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
(i) Always be on the alert for moving equipment. Employees must always expect movement on any track, at any time, in either direction.
(ii) Do not step or walk on the top of the rail, frog, switches, guard rails, or other track components. (iii) In passing around the ends of standing cars, engines, roadway machines or work equipment, leave at least 20 feet between yourself and the end of the equipment. Do not go between pieces of equipment of the opening is less than one car length (50 feet). (iv) Avoid walking or standing on a track unless so authorized by the employee in charge. (v) Before stepping over or crossing tracks, look in both directions first. (vi) Do not sit on, lie under, or cross between cars except as required in the performance of your duties and only when track and equipment have been protected against movement.

E. All employees must comply with all federal and state regulations concerning workplace safety.

City Council/RSA Agenda 365 Tuesday, November 14, 2023

EXHIBIT E
TO

PUBLIC AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AGREEMENT

RAILROAD'S INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 1. REQUIRED INSURANCE.

The Political Body shall, at its sole cost and expense, (except for Railroad Protective Liability Insurance required in Paragraph D), procure and maintain in effect during the entire term of this Agreement the following insurance coverage. The Political Body shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and maintained by its Contractor, at its sole cost and expense, Railroad Protective Liability Insurance coverage described in Paragraph D during any period of construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, reconstruction or removal work.

A. Commercial General Liability insurance. Commercial general liability (CGL) with a limit of not less than $5,000,000 each occurrence and an aggregate limit of not less than $10,000,000.

CGL insurance must be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 12 04 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage).

The policy must also contain the following endorsement, which must be stated on the certificate of insurance:
• Contractual Liability Railroads ISO form CG 24 17 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) showing "Union Pacific Railroad Company Property" as the Designated Job Site.
• Designated Construction Project(s) General Aggregate Limit ISO Form CG 25 03 03 97 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) showing the project on the form schedule.

The policy must contain the following endorsements, which must be stated on the certificate of insurance:
• Coverage For Certain Operations In Connection With Railroads ISO form CA 20 70 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) showing "Union Pacific Property" as the Designated Job Site.
• Motor Carrier Act Endorsement - Hazardous materials clean up (MCS-90) if required by law.

C. Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability insurance. Coverage must include but not be limited to:
• Political Body's statutory liability under the workers' compensation laws of the state where the work is being performed.

DEN-160449-3
City Council/RSA Agenda 366 Tuesday, November 14, 2023
• Employers' Liability (Part B) with limits of at least $500,000 each accident, $500,000 disease policy limit $500,000 each employee.

If the Political Body is self-insured, evidence of state approval and excess workers compensation coverage must be provided. Coverage must include liability arising out of the U. S.

Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Act, the Jones Act, and the Outer Continental Shelf Land Act, if applicable.

Union City City CouncilNovember 14, 2023

Union City City Council
November 14, 2023