Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Union City City Council
March 10, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
March 10, 2026
Body
Union City City Council
Pages
23
Original file
17.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on unioncity.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

March 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 1 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

NOTICE AND AGENDA

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Vice Mayor (District 2)
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember (District 1)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, March 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM
City Hall – Tom Kitayama City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587
NOTICE OF PARTICIPATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 54953(b) Councilmember Nishihira will participate in the meeting via teleconference from the site listed below. The meeting agenda will be posted on the publicly accessible teleconference site. Anyone wishing to address the Council from the teleconference site may do so.

Location:

Sheraton Park Hotel at the Anaheim Resort
1855 S Harbor Blvd
Anaheim, CA 92802
(714) 750-1811

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1. Pledge of Allegiance

1.2. Roll Call

2. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

2.1. Proclamation Recognizing March 2026 as Women's History Month

2.2. Proclamation Recognizing March 8, 2026 as International Women's Day March 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 2 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Each person who wishes to speak during the Oral Communications section for non-agenda items will have up to three minutes. The Chair may shorten this time if there are many speakers or the City Council has a full agenda. If you want to speak during the first Oral Communications section, please complete a speaker card with your name and city of residence. You may also provide a mailing address if you would like to receive future information from the City. Filling out a speaker card and providing your name, city of residence, or mailing address is not required to speak, but it helps keep accurate records.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be approved together with one motion. If any item requires discussion, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and discussed separately.

4.1. Approve the February 24, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes

4.2. Adopt a Resolution Concurring with the Mayor’s Appointment of Gabriel Borden to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) and Ignacio Romero to the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT)

4.3. Adopt a Resolution Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement for Recycling Collection and Processing Services with Tri-City Economic Development Corporation (Tri-CED)

4.4. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Award of a Construction Contract to RNR Paving, Inc., in the Amount of $271,923, and Approving a Total Construction Budget in the Amount of $326,308, for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project, City Project No. 24-15

5. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

5.1. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the Amount of $2,578,000, for a Total Contract Amount of $10,567,191, for the Final Design of Phase (Segment) 1 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04

5.2. Receive a Second Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026

5.3. Receive a Report on the Results of the Community Survey to Consider Placing a Measure on the November 2026 Ballot to Extend the Utility Users' Tax and Provide Direction

6. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

7. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL

8. GOOD OF THE ORDER

9. ADJOURNMENT
March 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 3 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

MEETING INFORMATION
The City Council is authorized to take action only on items listed on this agenda. Public comment is both welcomed and encouraged on all agenda items. If you wish to address the Council, please complete a speaker card and submit it before the Oral Communications section.

Regular City Council meetings are held in person on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587.

Meetings can also be observed via Zoom: http://citycouncil-live.unioncity.org.

Meetings are broadcast live on UCTV Channel 15 and live-streamed on the City's website:
https://bit.ly/3x9mEiR.

Public Comment: Members of the public cannot provide comments via Zoom unless specifically permitted, as detailed below. Remote access is subject to technical availability. If the Zoom platform or other technology fails, the City Council will proceed with the meeting in person unless prohibited by law.

Public Records: Documents related to agenda items are available for review on the City's website (https://www.unioncity.org) or during business hours at the City Clerk's Office, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587.

Accessibility: If you require special assistance to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (510) 675-5448 at least 72 hours before the meeting. Closed captioning is available for all regular City Council meetings.

ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
In-Person Public Comment:

Members of the public may address the Council on any agenda item or during the Public Input portion of the meeting. To speak, please fill out a speaker card with your name and city of residence. If you would like a follow-up from the City, you may also provide your mailing address. Completing a speaker card and providing your name, city, or mailing address are not required to make a public comment but are requested for record-keeping purposes.

Written Comment:

To submit written comments on an agenda item or during Public Comment, please email [email protected]. Include "Public Comment" in the subject line and reference the agenda item number. Written comments will be forwarded to the City Council and made publicly available.

Public Comment via Zoom:

As noted above, the public may not address the Council via Zoom unless required by AB 2449. If the City is required to provide this opportunity, the Mayor will announce it at the beginning of the meeting. If allowed, raise your virtual hand on Zoom to indicate that you would like to speak on a specific agenda item.

CITY COUNCIL NORMS AND GUIDELINES
(Resolution No. 6129-23; Adopted May 23, 2023)
The Union City Council abides by the following norms:

March 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 4 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

1. We conduct ourselves in a professional manner, treat everyone with respect, and act with high integrity, always putting the interests of the City of Union City ahead of self-interests in accordance with our code of ethics.

2. We respect the Council-Manager form of government, and do not interfere with the City Manager's role or any professional duties of City staff.

3. We recognize that matters of confidential nature are to be kept private and undisclosed.

4. We respect each other's opinions and are supportive of each other's work advocating for the City, and we ensure that all voices are heard. We do not criticize others for having a different point of view, and we agree to disagree respectfully.

5. We understand that the City Council acts as a body, all members are equal, and policy direction is only given by a majority vote of the City Council. Once a decision is made, all members of the City Council must respect the City Council's direction.

6. We will be prepared for City Council meetings and ask our questions of the City Manager in advance so we can avoid surprising City staff at meetings.

7. We do not criticize City staff publicly or to others and will refrain from directing them. Instead, we will take our concerns and questions privately to the City Manager.

8. We will govern on an at-large basis, although elected by districts. We will maintain a citywide perspective and consider the needs and interests of the entire community.

9. We will continue to allocate resources based on long-term strategic priorities and efforts, with consideration of citywide service levels and financial capacity.

10. We understand customer service is the priority and each member of the City Council will help constituents regardless of the district in which they reside or from which a Councilmember themselves is elected.

11. We recognize the significant importance of attendance and participation at City Council meetings in proceeding with City business. All members of the City Council should endeavor to miss no more than two regular meetings per calendar year absent extraordinary circumstances. Members of the City Council should, absent unforeseen circumstances, provide a minimum of sixty days' notice to the City Council of planned absences during the Good of the Order or Items Referred by Council portion of the City Council agenda, as appropriate.

May these Council Norms be administered and enforced in the following manner:

1. Councilmembers have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met by the Council, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government.

2. The Mayor and the Council have the responsibility to intervene when action of its members are in violation of Council Norms.

3. The City Council can review and revise the Council Norms as needed.

4. During City Council discussions, deliberations, and proceedings, the Mayor is designated with the primary responsibility to ensure that Councilmembers adhere to the Council Norms.

March 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 5 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

CERTIFICATION OF MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA POSTING
This notice and agenda were posted on the City's website and the City Hall bulletin board at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date, in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. /s/Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk/Secretary to the City of Union City Successor Agency

2.1. Proclamation Recognizing March 2026 as Women's History Month City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 1 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 2.1
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Proclamation Recognizing March 2026 as Women's History Month Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Proclamation

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROCLAMATION
Recognizing March 2026 as
Women’s History Month
WHEREAS, Women’s History Month is observed each March to honor the many contributions women have made throughout history and to recognize their lasting impact on our community, our nation, and the world; and
WHEREAS, the 2026 theme, “Leading the Change: Women Shaping a Sustainable Future,” highlights the leadership of women in building strong communities, advancing education, protecting the environment, and promoting long-term solutions that benefit future generations; and
WHEREAS, women have led important efforts in government, business, science, healthcare, education, and civic life, often overcoming barriers and creating new opportunities for others; and
WHEREAS, women in Union City continue to shape a more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable future through service, mentorship, innovation, and community leadership.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gary Singh, Mayor of the City of Union City, and on behalf of the entire City Council, do hereby proclaim March 2026 as Women's History Month in the City of Union City and encourage all residents to celebrate and recognize the leadership and contributions of women who are shaping a sustainable future for our community.

DATED: March 10, 2026
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Vice Mayor
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember
JEFF WANG, Councilmember

2.2. Proclamation Recognizing March 8, 2026 as International Women's Day City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 1 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 2.2
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Proclamation Recognizing March 8, 2026 as International Women's Day
Attachments

1. Proclamation

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROCLAMATION

Recognizing March 8, 2026 as
International Women’s Day
WHEREAS, International Women’s Day, observed each year on March 8, is a global day recognizing the social, economic, cultural, and political achievements of women and girls, and reaffirming the call for equality; and
WHEREAS, women and girls play a vital role in shaping Union City’s future as leaders, workers, caregivers, innovators, educators, and public servants; and WHEREAS, the 2026 theme, “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls,” calls on communities to protect equal rights, advance fairness, and take meaningful action to remove barriers that limit opportunity; and
WHEREAS, achieving rights and justice requires continued commitment to safe communities, equal access to education and employment, fair treatment under the law, and freedom from discrimination and violence; and
WHEREAS, the City of Union City supports efforts that promote inclusion, dignity, and opportunity, recognizing that when women and girls thrive, our entire community grows stronger; and
WHEREAS, International Women’s Day provides an opportunity to celebrate progress, reflect on remaining challenges, and renew our shared commitment to equity for all women and girls.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gary Singh, Mayor of the City of Union City, and on behalf of the entire City Council, do hereby proclaim Sunday, March 8, 2026, as International Women’s Day in the City of Union City and encourage all residents to recognize the importance of rights, justice, and action for all women and girls.

DATED: March 10, 2026
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Vice Mayor
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember
JEFF WANG, Councilmember

3.1. Written Oral Communications

David Rutan

4.1. Approve the February 24, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 1 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.1
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approve the February 24, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the meeting minutes Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Action Minutes

Page 1 of 6 ends

MINUTES

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAMIE PATIÑO, Vice Mayor (District 2)
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember (District 1)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, February 24, 2026 | 7:00 PM
City Hall – Tom Kitayama City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Singh called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM.

1.1. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Singh led the Pledge of Allegiance.

1.2. Roll Call
Attendance Attendee Name
Present Lance Nishihira, Councilmember
Scott Sakakihara, Councilmember
Jeff Wang, Councilmember
Jaime Patiño, Vice Mayor
Gary Singh, Mayor
Absent None

2. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

2.1. Proclamation Recognizing February 2026 as Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month
Mayor Singh read aloud the proclamation and presented it to Safe Alternatives to Violent Environments Community Education Manager Jane Dalugdugan and Community Education Specialist Angelle Mercado, Team Stronger Than You Think Youth Leaders Sai Soudherpally, Samar Mehtabuddoin, and Ekam Josan, February 24, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 2 of 6
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
Union City Youth and Family Services Intervention Counselor Baker, and Case Manager Palomino. They briefly provided remarks afterwards.

2.2. Presentation and Overview of the Union City and Alameda County Fire Department Plan, Prepare, Respond, Recover Program
Economic Development Coordinator Weddington and Emergency Services Coordinator Martinez provided the staff presentation and overview of the item.

2.3. Proclamations Recognizing Participation And Leadership In The Plan, Prepare, Respond, Recover Training Program
Mayor Singh read aloud the proclamation and presented it to Tri-Ced Community Recycling Chief Executive Officer Jason Toro and EHS Director Cerys Evans, who later provided brief remarks.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Singh opened Oral Communications. The following speaker spoke on items that were not on the agenda:

Kevin Lamantia
There being no further speakers, Mayor Singh closed Oral Communications.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Vice Mayor Patiño requested Item 4.3 to be pulled from the Consent Calendar.

Mayor Singh requested Item 4.7 be pulled from the Consent Calendar.

Motion: Approve the Consent Calendar Items 4.1, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, and 4.8.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Councilmember Sakakihara
SECONDER: Councilmember Wang
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None

4.1. Approve the February 10, 2026 City Council Special Meeting Action Minutes
Approved as part of the Consent Calendar.

4.2. Approve the February 10, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes
Approved as part of the Consent Calendar.

4.3. Adopt a Resolution Approving No Redistribution of Unspent and Relinquished Funds for the City Council's Travel and Training Budget in FY 2025-2026, in Addition to Returning Unused Funds to the General Fund Vice Mayor Patiño pulled the item.

4.4. Adopt a Resolution Approving Amendments to the City's Classification February 24, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 3 of 6
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
and Compensation Plan for Unrepresented Classifications, in Conformance with California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-018

4.5. Adopt a Resolution of the City of Union City Approving and Adopting the Side Letter to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the City and the Operating Engineers Local 3 - Professional Employees Group (OE3-PEG) to Address Leaves for the Period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Side Letter on Behalf of the City Regarding Leave Administration
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-019

4.6. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Consulting Services Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc., for Building Division Support Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-020

4.7. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing City Staff to File Annual Funding Applications with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Funds for the Operation of Union City Transit Services for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
The item was pulled from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Singh.

4.8. Adopt a Resolution Accepting $50,000 from the Transportation Fund for Clean Air, Administered by the Alameda County Transportation Commission, Amending the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund Budget, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Project Funding Agreement for the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project Phase II, City Project No. 26-38
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-021

4.3. Adopt a Resolution Approving No Redistribution of Unspent and Relinquished Funds for the City Council's Travel and Training Budget in FY 2025-2026, in Addition to Returning Unused Funds to the General Fund Vice Mayor Patiño pulled the item for further discussion.

Motion: Adopt a resolution approving no redistribution of unspent and relinquished funds for the City Council's Travel and Training Budget in FY 2025-2026, in addition to returning unused funds to the General Fund.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Vice Mayor Patiño
SECONDER: Councilmember Wang
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor February 24, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 4 of 6
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-022

4.7. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing City Staff to File Annual Funding Applications with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Funds for the Operation of Union City Transit Services for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
Mayor Singh announced that, pursuant to the Political Reform Act, he had a financial conflict of interest related to this item. He stated that MV Transportation, Inc., which operates Union City Transit under contract with the City, leases real property from him and is therefore a source of income. Mayor Singh recused himself from consideration of the item and left the Council Chambers.

Motion: Adopt a resolution authorizing City staff to file annual funding applications with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of funds for the operation of Union City Transit Services for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Councilmember Nishihira
SECONDER: Councilmember Wang
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, and Vice Mayor Patiño
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSED: Mayor Singh

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-023
Mayor Singh returned to the Council Chambers.

5. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

5.1. Receive Report on Larry Orozco Teen Bike Workshop Remediation and Repair Cost Analysis and Provide Direction
Deputy City Manager Phan provided the staff presentation and overview of the remediation and repair cost analysis for the Larry Orozco Teen Bike Workshop.

Supervising Construction Inspector Gutierrez assisted and responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Singh opened Public Comment. The following speaker spoke on the item:

Gracie Vega
There being no further speakers, Mayor Singh closed Public Comment.

Motion: Confirm support to proceed with renovation and abatement of the Larry Orozco Teen Bike Workshop as funding becomes available; direct staff to consult with the community regarding restoration or repainting of the mural following abatement; and direct staff to return with a resolution February 24, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 5 of 6
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
forming an ad hoc subcommittee to develop a phased funding and implementation plan.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Mayor Singh
SECONDER: Councilmember Wang
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None

6. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
There were none.

7. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL
Vice Mayor Patiño reported that he attended the Cal Cities Board of Directors meeting on February 19 and 20 in Berkeley, where sales tax revenue allocation for online sales was discussed. He also attended the Decoto Mural Project meeting on February 19 and will attend the Latino Caucus Board of Directors Strategic Plan meeting virtually on February 25.

Councilmember Sakakihara reported attending the Housing Authority of Alameda County meeting on February 11 and the Ava Community Energy Board meeting on February 18.

Councilmember Wang reported attending the Youth Commission meeting on February 11.

Councilmember Nishihira reported attending the StopWaste Programs Administrative Committee meeting on February 12. He also noted upcoming meetings for the Human Relations Commission, Alameda County Library Commission, and other assigned bodies.

Mayor Singh reported attending the Alameda County Mayors’ Conference and the Legislation and Policy Committee meeting.

8. GOOD OF THE ORDER
Vice Mayor Patiño reported attending multiple community events, including the Tropics Food Drive on February 13, the Seabreeze Park Ribbon Cutting on February 21, and the retirement event for Captain Sean Burrows of Firefighters Local 55. He also reported attending a National League of Cities digital focus group and a constituency group presidents meeting. Vice Mayor Patiño announced that the Tracy Police Department located Avtar Singh deceased near Lake Berryessa and shared that the Gurdwara Guru Nanak Parkash in Tracy, CA requested that no public demonstrations or organized vigils take place. He expressed condolences to the family.

Councilmember Sakakihara reported attending the Day of Remembrance event and the Seabreeze Park Ribbon Cutting.

Councilmember Wang reported attending the Tropics Food Drive, the Seabreeze Park Ribbon Cutting, and a firefighters’ retirement event. He also reported participation in an Asian Pacific American Municipal Officials meeting under the National League of Cities.

Councilmember Nishihira reported upcoming attendance at the Joint Venture Silicon Valley State of the Valley event, the Lions Club Crab Feed, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Phase II engagement meeting, and the Planning Commissioners Academy. He announced February 24, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 6 of 6
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
that he will participate remotely at the next City Council meeting from the Sheraton Park Hotel at Anaheim, California.

Mayor Singh reported attending the Chinese New Year celebration, Senator Dr. Aisha Wahab’s State of the District event, and the Seabreeze Park Ribbon Cutting. Mayor Singh expressed condolences regarding the tragic death of Avtar Singh and stated that the City stands in solidarity with the family and the community.

9. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Singh adjourned the meeting at 8:46 PM.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council/Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Union City on March 10, 2026.
/s/Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk

4.2. Adopt a Resolution Concurring with the Mayor’s Appointment of Gabriel Borden to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) and Ignacio Romero to the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT) City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.2
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving the Mayor’s Appointment of Gabriel Borden to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) and Ignacio Romero to the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At its regular meeting held on February 19, 2026, the Planning Commission recommended Alternate Commissioner Gabriel Borden to serve as its representative to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) and Commissioner Ignacio Romero to serve on the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT).

Pursuant to UCMC Section 2.20.030 and the City’s Commission Guidelines, appointments to City boards, commissions, and committees are made by the Mayor with City Council approval. The Mayor has appointed Mr. Borden and Mr. Romero, subject to City Council approval.

Adoption of the proposed resolution will formalize these appointments and align the terms with the City’s standardized appointment policy

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
These appointments support:

Goal B. Governance and Organizational Effectiveness — Commitment to local government best practices and effective advisory body operations.

Goal C. Economic, Community Development, And Public Safety — Promotion of community growth and forward-thinking economic development strategies.

BACKGROUND
The Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) includes representation from the Planning Commission. At its regular meeting on February 19, 2026, the Planning Commission selected Gabriel Borden to serve as its representative to BPAC.

Agenda Item No. 4.2
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 March 10, 2026
At the same meeting, the Planning Commission recommended Ignacio Romero for service on the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT).

In accordance with the City’s Commission Guidelines and UCMC Section 2.20.030, appointments to City boards, commissions, and committees are made by the Mayor with City Council approval.

Following the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Mayor has appointed Mr.

Borden and Mr. Romero, subject to Council approval.

DISCUSSION
Planning Commission Representative to BPAC
The Planning Commission’s representation on BPAC ensures coordination between land use planning, active transportation infrastructure, and mobility policy objectives.

The Mayor has appointed Gabriel Borden to serve in this capacity. Council approval is required to finalize the appointment.

EDAT
EDAT provides advisory input to the City Council on economic development strategies, business retention and attraction, and economic vitality initiatives.

The Mayor has appointed Ignacio Romero to serve on EDAT following the Planning Commission’s recommendation.

Term Standardization
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-029, new appointments to City boards, commissions, and committees commence on January 1 and expire on December 31 of the final year of the term.

Both appointments shall expire on December 31, 2029, unless otherwise directed by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal iompact associated with these appointments.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt a resolution approving of the Mayor’s appointment of:

1. Gabriel Borden as the Planning Commission representative to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC); and

2. Ignacio Romero to the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT).

Agenda Item No. 4.2
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 March 10, 2026
Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Draft Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY APPROVING THE MAYOR’S APPOINTMENTS OF GABRIEL BORDEN

TO THE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) AND

IGNACIO ROMERO TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY

TEAM (EDAT)
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting held on February 19, 2026, the Planning Commission recommended Gabriel Borden to serve as its representative to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) and Ignacio Romero to serve on the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to UCMC Section 2.20.030 and the City’s Commission Guidelines, members of City boards, commissions, and committees are appointed by the Mayor with City Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor has appointed Gabriel Borden and Ignacio Romero, subject to City Council approval; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-029, new appointments shall commence on January 1 and expire on December 31 of the final year of the term Resolution No. 2025-029.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby approves the Mayor’s appointments of:

1. Gabriel Borden as the Planning Commission representative to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), for a term expiring December 31, 2029; and

2. Ignacio Romero to the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT), for a term expiring December 31, 2029; and
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Concurring With Mayor’s Appointments to BPAC and EDAT

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on March 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney

4.3. Adopt a Resolution Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement for Recycling Collection and Processing Services with Tri-City Economic Development Corporation (Tri-CED)
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 2 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.3
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement for Recycling Collection and Processing Services with Tri-City Economic Development Corporation (Tri-CED)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As part of the Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement for Recycling Collection and Processing Services, Tri-City Economic Development Corporation (Tri-CED) must provide certain security to ensure the Contractor’s performance under the Agreement.

Tri-CED was initially unable to provide the letter of credit required under the Agreement and has subsequently proposed using certificates of deposit in its place, in an amount acceptable to City staff. Additionally, a further minor amendment is proposed regarding the monthly payments due to Tri-CED from the City to better reflect past practice going forward. Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to reflect these changes.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This report is in alignment with the following City Council priority:

Goal D: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure Strategy 13: Continue monitoring the Collection Services Franchise Agreement Contractors assistance with organics regulations and waste diversion compliance.

BACKGROUND
On March 26, 2024, the City Council provided staff direction to continue negotiating a tenyear extension to the Franchise Agreement and to explore additional cost savings. The new agreement, approved by the City Council on April 23, 2024, established the compensation paid to the companies, the rates charged to ratepayers for service commencing FY 2025-2026 on July 1, 2025, and all other business and operational terms.

DISCUSSION
On August 19, 2025, the City entered into an Amended and Restated Franchise Agenda Item No. 4.3
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 2 March 10, 2026
Agreement (Agreement) with Tri-City Economic Development Corporation (Tri-CED).

Under Section 12.3 Performance Security of the Agreement, the Contractor is required to provide performance security, comprised of two (2) separate and distinct instruments in lieu of a performance bond, namely a $200,000 Certificate of Deposit and a $400,000 Letter of Credit.

The Contractor had been unable to provide a letter of credit in a form acceptable to the City and was therefore not in compliance with the existing security requirements. To address this issue and ensure adequate protection of the City’s interests, the Contractor initially provided a $200,000 Certificate of Deposit and subsequently provided an additional $400,000 Certificate of Deposit. The proposed amendment revises the performance security provisions to allow a combination of bonds and/or alternative security, including certificates of deposit, totaling $600,000, and clarifies that failure to provide sufficient security constitutes a default under the Agreement.

The amendment also revises Section 11.5 (B) Payment of Contractor’s Compensation, which outlines the compensation reconciliation provisions of the Agreement. Under the current structure, reconciliation is scheduled to begin in the first month of the second quarter. To improve accuracy and better reflect actual revenue collections, the amendment shifts reconciliation to the second month of each quarter, while maintaining the overall compensation methodology and ongoing adjustments for aging receivables and bad debt.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the City Council taking the recommended action.

The proposed amendments incorporate practical adjustments to the performance security and compensation reconciliation provisions, which will further ease contract administration and mutual understanding by clarifying the terms and conditions under the Agreement.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council proceed with adopting a resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement for Recycling Collection and Processing Services with Tri-City Economic Development Corporation (Tri-CED).

Prepared by: Jennifer Phan, Deputy City Manager
Submitted by: Jennifer Phan, Deputy City Manager
Attachments

1. Draft Resolution

2. Amendment No. 1 – Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement with Tri-City Economic Development Corporation
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED FRANCHISE

AGREEMENT FOR RECYCLING COLLECTION AND PROCESSING

SERVICES WITH TRI-CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION (TRI-CED)
WHEREAS, the City executed a Franchise Agreement (“Agreement”) for Recycling Collection and Processing Services with Tri-City Economic Development Corporation (TriCED) to provide recycling collection and processing services (the “Services”) dated October 27, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement with Tri-CED expired on June 30, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City and Tri-CED (Parties) previously agreed to the terms, conditions, and costs to provide the Services for an additional ten (10) years that commenced on July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2035 (the “New Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement, to ensure no interruption in the service delivery and all other terms and conditions prescribed in said New Agreement via Resolution No. 2025-076; and WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the New Agreement to revise “Section 11.5 (B) Payment of Contractor’s Compensation,” which outlines the quarterly revenue reconciliation process, and “Section 12.3 Performance Security” terms and conditions to allow a combination of bonds and/or alternative security.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Union City that the recitals above are hereby incorporated herein by reference; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement for Recycling Collection and Processing Services with Tri-CED, attached hereto, in a form approved by the City Attorney; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to take all actions necessary and execute all documents necessary, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.

Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approving Amendment No. 1 of Tri-Ced Agreement

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on March 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED FRANCHISE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF UNION CITY AND

TRI-CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
This Amendment to Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement between the City of Union City and Tri Cities Economic Development Corporation (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of February 1, 2026 (the “Effective Date”) by and between the City of Union City, a California municipal corporation (the “City”) and Tri-City Economic Development Corporation, a non-profit public benefit corporation (the “Contractor”) amending that certain Amended and Restated Franchise Agreement by and between the City and the Contractor dated as of August 19, 2025 (the “Agreement”). The City and the Contractor are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties,” and individually as a “Party.”

RECITALS
A. Section 12.3 of the Agreement requires the Contractor to provide certain security to ensure the Contractor’s performance under the Agreement.

B. Specifically, Section 12.3.B. requires the Contractor to provide a letter of credit to the City in the amount of $400,000 as security for the Contractor’s performance under the Agreement (the “Letter of Credit”).

C. The Parties desire to amend Section 12.3 of the Agreement to provide for Alternative Security that can be provided by the Contractor.

D. The City and the Contractor acknowledge that as of the Effective Date of this Amendment, the Contractor has provided a certificate of deposit as Alternative Security in the amount of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000).

E. The Parties have agreed to execute this Amendment to amend Section 12.3 of the Agreement in order to (i) ensure that the City has sufficient security for the performance by Contractor of its duties and requirements under the Agreement, and (ii) ensure that the provision of a total of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) in certificates of deposit to the City will meet the requirements of the Agreement.

F. The Parties additionally desire to amend Section 11.5.B. of the Agreement to more accurately reflect the actual method of payment from the City to the Contractor.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Recitals; Defined Terms. The Parties acknowledge the accuracy of the foregoing recitals. Any capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.

2. Amendment of Section 12.3. Section 12.3 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows:
“12.3 PERFORMANCE SECURITY
To guarantee the timely and full performance of the Contractor’s obligations under this Agreement, including the Contractor’s indemnity obligations, the Contractor shall deliver to the City copies of payment bond(s) and performance bond(s) issued by a reputable insurance company licensed to do business in California, each in the sum of not less than Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) (the “Bonds”).

In lieu of the Bonds, Contractor may submit evidence satisfactory to the City of security in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, pledge of cash deposit, certificate of deposit, or other marketable securities held by a broker or other financial institution, with signature authority of the City required for any withdrawal (the “Alternative Security”). The amount of the Bonds shall be reduced by the amount of Alternative Security provided by the Contractor to the City.

Failure to provide the Bonds, or a combination of Bonds and Alternative Security in the total amount of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) is a default under the Agreement, and the City may withhold Contractor’s Compensation in accordance with Section of 11.5.D of the Agreement unless and until sufficient security is provided.”

3. Amendment of Section 11.5.B. Section 11.5.B of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows:
“11.5 PAYMENT OF CONTRACTOR’S COMPENSATION
B. Regardless of the amount of revenue due to the Contractor that is received by the City from the Solid Waste Contractor in any month, the Contractor shall be paid fixed monthly compensation, subject to quarterly reconciliation as provided herein.

For the first three (3) months of the Term, Contractor’s compensation shall be paid in equally fixed monthly amounts. Thereafter, fixed payments shall be made in the first and third months of each quarter, each equal to one-twelfth (1/12) of the Contractor’s compensation as described in Exhibit G and adjusted annually as described in Exhibit O for the applicable Rate Year.

Beginning with the second month of the second quarter of the Term, Contractor’s compensation shall be reconciled to reflect the actual Contractor’s Revenue Requirement received by the City from the Solid Waste Contractor for the immediately preceding quarter. The payment made in the second month of each quarter shall be adjusted to reconcile amounts previously paid with actual revenues received and shall include adjustments for aging receivables and bad debt.

The City shall provide the Contractor with all revenue and billing documentation received from the Solid Waste Contractor within five (5) business days of receipt.”

4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

5. Entire Agreement. This Amendment constitutes and contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the Amendment, and supersedes any and all other prior negotiations, correspondence, understandings and agreements respecting such matter. There have been no additional oral or written representations or agreements, other than the Agreement. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

CITY OF UNION CITY,
a California municipal corporation
By: _______________________________
City Manager
ATTEST:

By: ___________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ___________________________
City Attorney

TRI-CITY COMMUNITY ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
a non-profit public benefit corporation
By: ___________________________
Its: ___________________________
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.4
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving the Award of a Construction Contract to RNR Paving, Inc., in the Amount of $271,923, and Approving a Total Construction Budget in the Amount of $326,308, for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project, City Project No. 24-15

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the award of a construction contract to RNR Paving, Inc., in the amount of $271,923, and approving a total construction budget, in the amount of $326,308, for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project, City Project No. 24-15.

Kennedy Park Improvements have been identified in the CDBG Annual Action Plan for the past three cycles. For a project to qualify for CDBG funds, it must first be included in the Annual Action Plan.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following City Council priority:

Goal D: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure Strategy 2: Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

BACKGROUND
Charles Kennedy Park (“Kennedy Park”), located on the eastern side of the City, is a large park located in the Decoto neighborhood near the Union City BART Station. The park features several playground areas, picnic areas, large open expanses of grass, a shaded concrete amphitheater, and the Kennedy Youth Center.

To maintain Kennedy Park as a vibrant hub for City residents, several improvements have been included in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-2026 to 2029-2030; among them, Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I (“Project”), seeks to rehabilitate the Kennedy Park parking lot located at the intersection of 13th Street and J Street. The Project will address deteriorating pavement, improve drainage, achieve ADA Agenda Item No. 4.4
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 March 10, 2026
compliance, and implement landscaping improvements to better integrate with the existing infrastructure.

On June 14, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 5956-22, which approved the 2022-2023 Community Block Development Grant Annual Action Plan to secure funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This grant funding is provided to states, cities, and counties for community development, affordable housing, and infrastructure projects focused on public facility upgrades, economic development, and neighborhood revitalization.

On November 24, 2024, the City executed a Consulting Services Agreement with CSG Consultants, Inc., in the amount of $73,684, for engineering design of improvements to the Kennedy Park parking lot and providing engineering support during construction.

On February 6, 2026, the City of Union City released a Notice Inviting Bids for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project, City Project No. 24-15 (Attachment 1).

On February 25, 2026, the City received fifteen bids (see Exhibit A), with the lowest responsive and responsible bid of $271,922.91 submitted by RNR Paving, Inc., of San Ramon, California.

DISCUSSION
The low bid is approximately 36% under the engineer’s estimate of $425,000. Although the City has no prior experience with RNR Paving, Inc., the reference checks were satisfactory.

The recommended Total Construction Budget of $326,308 includes the construction contract ($271,923), a contingency of 15% of the construction contract ($40,789), and engineering support at 5% of the construction contract ($13,596).

Construction of this project is anticipated to begin in May 2026 and be completed by the end of July 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Kennedy Park Improvement Project, Phase I, City Project No. 24-15, in the amount of $326,308, will be funded with Community Development Block Grant funds (Account Number 231-92415-57127), as identified in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY 2025-2026 through FY 2029-2030.

There is no impact on the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the award of a construction contract to RNR Paving, Inc., in the amount of $271,923, and approving a total construction budget, in the amount of $326,308, for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project, City Project No. 24-15.

Agenda Item No. 4.4
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 March 10, 2026
Prepared by: Erika Cramer, Administrative Assistant III Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – Notice of Bid

2. Draft Resolution

3. Exhibit A – Bid Summary

CITY OF UNION CITY

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

NOTICE TO BIDDERS
Sealed bids for the work shown on the plans and specifications entitled: Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I (“Project”), City Project No. 24-15, will be received at the office of the City Clerk of the City of Union City, City Government Building, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, California, until 2:00 PM, Tuesday, February 24, 2026, at which time they will be publicly opened and read in the Council Chambers of said building. The Engineer’s Estimate for the project base is Four Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($425,000).

The Contractor shall possess a Class A and/or Class C-12 California contractor’s license.

Bids are required for the entire work described herein. This contract is subject to the State contract nondiscrimination and compliance requirements pursuant to Government Code Section 12990.

Bid Package & Bid Package Location: All of the project work is to be done in accordance with the bid package on file with the Public Works Department - City of Union City, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, California 94587. Eligibility to bid on this project requires bid package to be electronically obtained from the City. Bid package may be obtained at no charge via email request to the City at [email protected]. Non-biddable plans and specifications shall be available to view at various Builders’ Exchanges throughout the Bay Area and on the City of Union City website at www.unioncity.org General Work Description: The project consists of rehabilitating parking lot pavement surface, base, and subbase in addition to the site drainage & its associated facilities, including installation of a new bioswale area. ADA improvements will be installed along with irrigation for new vegetation and trees. The parking lot perimeter will be brought up to standard and entire project is subject to the most current Caltrans Standard Specifications, and these special provisions.

All questions should be emailed to Trieu Tran by e-mail at [email protected] at least five (5) working days prior to the time specified for the bid opening. Where appropriate, the City may respond to such questions through procedures outlined in the Instructions to Bidders.

Minimum wage rates for this project as predetermined by the Secretary of Labor are set forth in the special provisions. If there is a difference between the minimum wage rates predetermined by the Secretary of Labor and prevailing wage rates determined by the Department of Industrial Relations for similar labor classifications, the contractor and his subcontractors shall pay not less than the higher wage rates.

Pursuant to Section 1773 of the Labor Code, the general prevailing rate of wages in the county in which the work is to be done has been determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, State of California. These wages are set forth in the General Prevailing Wage Rates for this project, available from the California Department of Industrial Relations’ web site at https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse. Future effective prevailing wage rates which have been predetermined and are on file with the California Department of Industrial Relations, are referenced but not printed in the general prevailing wage rates.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

APPROVING THE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO
RNR PAVING, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $271,923, AND APPROVING A TOTAL CONSTRUCTION BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $326,308,

FOR THE KENNEDY PARK IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I PROJECT,
CITY PROJECT NO. 24-15
WHEREAS, Charles Kennedy Park (“Kennedy Park”), located on the eastern side of the City, is a large park located in the Decoto neighborhood near the Union City BART Station. The park features several playground areas, picnic areas, large open expanses of grass, a shaded concrete amphitheater, and the Kennedy Youth Center; and
WHEREAS, to maintain Kennedy Park as a vibrant hub for City residents, several improvements have been included in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-2026 to 2029-2030; among them, Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I (“Project”), seeks to rehabilitate the Kennedy Park parking lot; and WHEREAS, the Project will address the deteriorating pavement, while also creating improved drainage, achieving ADA compliance, and implementing landscaping improvements to better integrate with the existing infrastructure; and WHEREAS, on June 14, 2022, City Council approved Resolution No. 5956-22, approving the 2022-2023 Community Block Development Grant Annual Action Plan in order to secure funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

This specific grant funding is provided to states, cities, and counties for community development, affordable housing, and infrastructure projects that focus on public facility upgrades, economic development, and neighborhood revitalization; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 2024, the City executed a Consulting Services Agreement with CSG Consultants, Inc., in the amount of $73,684, for engineering design of improvements to the Kennedy Park parking lot; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2026, the City of Union City released a Notice Inviting Bids for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project, City Project No. 24- 15; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2026, the City received fifteen bids (see Exhibit A), with the lowest responsive and responsible bid of $271,922.91 submitted by RNR Paving, Inc., of San Ramon, California; and
WHEREAS, the low bid is approximately 36% under the engineer’s estimate of $425,000, which is mainly attributable to the off-peak construction period; and WHEREAS, although the City has no prior experience with RNR Paving, Inc., a reference check was found satisfactory; and
WHEREAS, the recommended Total Construction Budget, in the amount of $326,308, includes the construction contract ($271,923), a contingency amount of 15% Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Award Construction Contract for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project

Page 2 of 2 ends

of the construction contract ($40,789), and engineering support at 5% of the construction contract ($13,596); and
WHEREAS, the Kennedy Park Improvement Project, Phase I, City Project No. 24-15, in the amount of $326,308, will be funded with Community Development Block Grant funds (Account Number 231-92415-57127), as identified in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY 2025-2026 through FY 2029-2030.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby awards the construction contract for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project, City Project No. 24-15, to RNR Paving, Inc., in the amount of $271,923; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby approves a Total Construction Budget, with contingencies and engineering support, in the amount of $326,308, for the Kennedy Park Improvements, Phase I Project, City Project No. 24-15.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on March 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – Bid Summary

BID SUMMARY
PROJECT: KENNEDY PARK PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 24-15
Project Manager: Trieu Tran, Civil Engineer III
DATE: Wednesday, February 25, 2026
TIME: 2:00 p.m.

LOCATION: City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587
No. BIDDERS BID AMOUNT
*CORRECTED*

BID AMOUNT

1. RNRN Paving Inc. $271,922.51 $271,922.91*

2. Gaub Trucking Corp. $338,135.00

3. Terocons Inc. $348,102.00

4. Guerra Construction Group $364,402.35

5. MOKA Engineering and Construction, LLC $379,597.50

6. Silicon Valley Paving, Inc. $398,305.25

7. Frontline General Engineering Construction, Inc. $413,829.14

8. Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. $417,707.00

9. Tri Valley Excavating Co. Inc. $425,453.70 $425,285.40*

10. Mark Lee & Yong Kay, Inc. dba Bay Construction Co. $447,620.00

11. Redgwick Construction Company $476,268.80

12. Allsite Corp. Goods/Services Construction $485,482.00

13. Ram-Con Corporation $504,016.00 $504,030.61*

14. Kerex Engineering, Inc. $525,642.00

15. JPB Designs Inc. $615,189.00

Page 1 of 2 ends
Page 2 of 2 ends

I, Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk of the City of Union City, do hereby certify that on Tuesday, February 24, 2026, I received and opened 15 (fifteen) bids for the above-mentioned project. * Note: All bid amounts will be verified by the Engineer. Any corrections will be shown in the column above.

Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 5 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 5.1
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the Amount of $2,578,000, for a Total Contract Amount of $10,567,191, for the Final Design of Phase (Segment) 1 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of $2,578,000, for a total contract amount of $10,567,191, for the final design of Phase (Segment) 1 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No.18-04.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal C, Strategy 2: Economic, Community Development, and Public Safety - Facilitate the build-out of the greater Station District Area through the construction of the Quarry Lakes Parkway, completion of the pedestrian rail crossing, and implementation of the recommendations of the Southern Alameda County Regional Rail Integration Study to make the Station District a passenger rail hub served by ACE.

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

BACKGROUND
In 2018, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) approved the request from the City of Union City to be the project sponsor for the remaining phases of the I-880 to Mission Boulevard/East West Connector Project and to update the project description eligible for the remaining commitment from the 1986 Measure B Transportation Expenditure Plan to reflect the name change to “Quarry Lakes Parkway Agenda Item No. 5.1
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 5 March 10, 2026 4
1 Project” (“Project”).

Alameda CTC has been the funding agency for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project for several decades because the Project was identified in a half-cent sales tax measure approved by voters in 1986, 2000, and 2014 to fund major transportation projects in Alameda County. Also, the project is identified in regional transportation plans, including the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Plan Bay Area 2050 and Alameda CTC’s Countywide Transportation Plan.

The Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, is funded with 1986 Measure B funds, 2014 Measure BB funds, and other transportation funds administered by Alameda CTC. The City of Union City has accepted over $9.0 million from the Alameda CTC Project Funding Agreement (PFA) No. A22-0053 for the Final Design of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04 (see Exhibit A for City Council Actions regarding the Project Funding for this project).

The Project consists of Quarry Lakes Parkway (QLP) in Union City and the Decoto Road Complete Streets Project in Fremont, which the City of Fremont will implement. Quarry Lakes Parkway in Union City consists of Phase 1: 7th Street Connection, Phase 2:

Gateway Connection, Phase 3: 11th Street Connection, and Phase 4: Grade Separations and Alvarado-Niles Connection. Phase 5: Paseo Padre Parkway and Bike Trail Connection is located in both Union City and Fremont.

Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. (“Consultant”), has been the selected engineering firm since 2022 for the Preliminary Design (35% Design) of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phases 1-4, and for the Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phases 1 and 2 (see Exhibit B for City Council Actions for these Consultant Services Agreements).

On August 12, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-117, authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fourth Amendment to the Consultant Service Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of $2,988,000, for total contract amount of $7,989,191, for the Final Design of Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector), City Project No. 18-04.

The Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2, included the definition of the required public right-of-way on the former Caltrans parcels for Quarry Lakes Parkway between Old Alameda Creek and Alvarado-Niles Road and Quarry Lakes Drive between Isherwood Drive in Fremont and Quarry Lakes Parkway.

On October 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-146, authorizing the dedication of City-Owned Land As Right-of-Way, Landscape Easement, and Public Utility Easement (PUE) for Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector) Project, City Project No. 18-04, and authorizing the City Manager to accept such dedication. The Public Right-of-Way Dedication, Public Utility Easement (PUE), and Landscape Easement Dedication required for the construction of Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector) Project, City Project No. 18-04, was recorded on January 29, 2026, at the Alameda County Clerk-Recorder’s Office (see Exhibit C and Exhibit D).

Agenda Item No. 5.1
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 5 March 10, 2026 4
1 The Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2, also included preparation of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Addendum of the 2009 East West Connector Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phases 1-4, in Union City, which documents the project changes, reevaluates the environmental impacts and identifies the required mitigation and permits before construction of the project can begin.

The Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2, also included completing the overall hydrology, hydraulics, and drainage analysis for Phases 1-4 within Union City and includes the design of the Alameda County Flood Control’s Line M Flood Control Channel realignment next to the Corporation Yard within Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, as well as the Line M overflow drainage system connecting to the Flood Control Channel, originating in Phase 1, flowing through Phases 3 and 4, and discharging into Old Alameda Creek in Phase 2.

The 65% Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimate (PS&E) for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, was submitted to the City, Alameda CTC, Alameda County Flood Control District, Alameda County Water District, Union Sanitary District, PG&E, other utilities, and Caltrans on April 30, 2025; the design was put on hold until the overall hydrology, hydraulics, and drainage analysis for Phases 1-4 within Union City was completed.

DISCUSSION
On February 10, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-017, accepting $16,728,000 from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, of which $2,578,000 is allocated to the Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 (see Exhibit E for RM3 Allocation Letter).

The Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of $2,578,000, will allow them to complete the Final Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimate for Phase 1 of Quarry Lakes Parkway by updating the 65% PS&E, incorporating review comments received from the City, Alameda County Flood Control, the utility companies, and regulatory agencies, (see Exhibit F for Phase 1 Title Sheet ).

The Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, includes the new multimodal roadway from 7th Street to Mission Boulevard, the realignment of the Line M Flood Control Channel to accommodate the new roadway, the reconstruction and relocation of the southern portion of the City’s Corporation Yard security wall, the Line M overflow drainage system, the realignment of 7th Street along the front of the Corporation Yard from Zwissig Way to the new road, the new parking lot next to Drigon Dog Park, and the new Class I multi-use trail along Mission Boulevard connecting Quarry Lakes Parkway to Holly Leaf Lane.

Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 is located within the properties belonging to the Alameda County Flood Control District for the existing Line M Flood Control Channel, the Cityowned properties for the Corporation Yard, Drigon Dog Park, and the reserved land for Agenda Item No. 5.1
City Council Staff Report Page 4 of 5 March 10, 2026 4
1 the future Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector) and the existing public right-ofway (roadway and utilities) for the existing 7th Street (see Attachment 2 for exhibit of the existing properties).

The proposed alignment of the new roadway will affect and require modifications to properties owned by the Alameda County Flood Control District and the City of Union City for the Corporation Yard. The dog park will not be affected by the new roadway, except that a new public parking lot will be constructed next to it.

Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, includes the right-of-way engineering to define and finalize the new public right-of-way, the landscape easement, and the public utility easement (PUE) required for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, and the realignment of 7th Street (see Attachment 3 of the exhibit of the proposed public right-of-way with the anticipated impacts to the Corporation Yard).

The Consultant and the City will be coordinating with Alameda County Public Works staff on the new right-of-way needed for the new roadway and establishing the Flood Control property for the realignment of the Line M Flood Control Channel, followed by finalizing the design of the Line M Flood Control Channel and the Line M overflow drainage system (along with revising or renewing existing maintenance agreements).

Similar to the Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2, the public right-of-way, the landscape easement, and PUE must be defined and recorded before the utility companies will finalize their relocation plans.

The Final PS&E for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, is nearing completion and will be ready for bid in the summer of 2027, with contract award by early Fall 2027, construction anticipated to begin in early 2028, and completion expected by the end of 2029. The estimated construction cost for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, is about $36.0 million.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of $2,578,000, for Final Design of Phase (Segment) 1 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, will be funded with Capital Projects Grants Fund monies (Account Number 410-91804-57128).

There will be no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of $2,578,000, for a total contract amount of $10,567,191, for the final design of Phase (Segment) 1 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No.18-04.

Prepared by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Agenda Item No. 5.1
City Council Staff Report Page 5 of 5 March 10, 2026 4
1 Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – Mark Thomas Amendment No. 5

2. Attachment 2 – Phase 1 Exhibit of Existing Properties

3. Attachment 3 – Phase 1 Exhibit of Proposed Right-of-Way

4. Draft Resolution

5. Exhibit A – List of Alameda CTC Council Actions

6. Exhibit B – List of Mark Thomas Council Actions

7. Exhibit C – Recorded Right-of-Way for Phase 2

8. Exhibit D – Recorded Landscape Easement and PUE for Phase 2

9. Exhibit E – MTC RM3 Allocation Letter

10.Exhibit F – Title Sheet (65%) for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1

FIFTH AMENDMENT

TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC.

FOR FINAL DESIGN OF QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY, PHASE 1
THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT (the “Fifth Amendment”) is effective as of this 10th day of March, 2026, by and between THE CITY OF UNION CITY, a municipal corporation, (“City”) and MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., ("Consultant"), collectively referred to as the "Parties."
W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, on January 3, 2022, the Parties entered into a Consulting Services Agreement (C5833) (“Agreement”) wherein the Consultant will provide the City with consulting services related to Final Design of Phases 1 & 2 for Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, in the amount of $1,200,000; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2022, the Parties entered into a First Amendment to the Agreement to Consulting Services Agreement (C5833b) (“First Amendment”) to perform final design services for Quarry Lakes Parkway Phase 1 to 30% PS&E level and Phase 2 to 65% PS&E level, in the amount of $3,000,000, and a total contract amount of $4,200,000: and
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2023, the Parties entered into a Second Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement (C5833c) (“Second Amendment”) to extend the term of service to June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on February 11, 2025, the Parties entered into a Third Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement (C25PW1067-3A) (“Third Amendment”) to perform final design services for Quarry Lakes Parkway Phase 1 to 65% PS&E level, in the amount of $801,191, and total contract amount of $5,001,191; and
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, the Parties entered into a Fourth Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement (C5833-4A) ("Fourth Amendment") to perform final design services for Quarry Lakes Parkway Phase 2 to Bid Ready PS&E documents and bid support services, in the amount of $2,988,000, and a total contract amount of $7,989,191; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to expand the Scope of Services and extend the term of service; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant desire to enter into this Fifth Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 2 of 23 ends

1. The “Scope of Services”, as set forth in Exhibit A of the Agreement and amended by the First through Fourth Amendments, is hereby further amended to include the services contained in Exhibit A of this Fifth Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. The "Term of Services", as set forth in the first sentence of Section 1.1, is hereby extended to June 30, 2028.

3. The “Compensation Schedule”, as set forth in Exhibit B of the Agreement and amended by the First through Fourth Amendments, is hereby amended to reflect payment based upon a sum increase of Two Million Five Hundred SeventyEight Thousand Dollars ($2,578,000), as set forth in Exhibit B of this Fifth Amendment. The total compensation under the Agreement, including this Amendment, shall not exceed a total contract amount of Ten Million Five Hundred Sixty-Seven Thousand One Hundred Ninety-One Dollars ($10,567,191).

The first sentence of the original agreement shall now read:

City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed Ten Million Five Hundred Sixty-Seven Thousand One Hundred Ninety-One Dollars ($10,567,191), notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in Consultant's proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement.

4. The "Project Schedule" is hereby amended as depicted in Exhibit A-2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

5. All other provisions of the Agreement, remain unchanged except as modified by this Fifth Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Consultant have executed this Amendment effective as of the date hereinabove written.

THE CITY OF UNION CITY MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC.

By By
Joan Malloy Shawn O’Keefe
City Manager Principal / Vice President
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 3 of 23 ends

Attest:
___________________________
Thai Nam N. Pham
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
____________________________
Kristopher J. Kokotaylo
City Attorney
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 4 of 23 ends

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOR FINAL DESIGN- QLP PHASE 1
The scope of services for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, is to update 65% PS&E package to produce Bid Ready PS&E documents and assist City with the bidding support services as follows:

TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The Mark Thomas team will provide project management for each task for the entire duration of the Agreement schedule. It is assumed this amendment will be completed in 16 months.

Task 1.1.1. Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design
Mark Thomas will supervise, coordinate and monitor design for conformance with guidelines, standards and policies as noted herein.

Task 1.1.2. Coordination
The Mark Thomas team will coordinate with the other design consultants, utility providers and affected agencies for timely flow of information for each task activity.

Task 1.1.4. Maintain Project Files
Mark Thomas will maintain project files and provide a file repository for final documents in the Microsoft Teams environment.

Task 1.1.5. Update Project CPM Schedule
Mark Thomas will coordinate with the City to update the Project CPM schedule on a monthly basis. Mark Thomas will prepare CPM schedule (Microsoft Project) within 10 working days from Notice-to-Proceed (NTP) anticipated in March 2026. The CPM will be updated on a monthly basis. The monthly CPM update will include a listing of tasks performed the previous month and a listing of tasks to be performed based on a onemonth look-ahead schedule. The monthly CPM updates listing will be submitted one week prior to the regularly scheduled monthly PDT meeting. The overall master CPM schedule will be updated every 6 months to show: tasks completed to-date, progress updates for tasks (percent completed) and the remaining tasks to be performed.

Task 1.1.6. Design Coordination Meetings
The Mark Thomas team will prepare agenda and lead the design coordination check-in meetings. This task also includes up to 12 stakeholder/agency meetings to resolve engineering issues and one presentation to City Council. This may include meetings with Union Sanitary District, PG&E, ACWD, AC Transit, Union City Transit, Caltrans, East Bay Regional Park District, ACFC&WCD and RWQCB.

Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 5 of 23 ends

Task 1.1.7. Project Development Meetings
The Mark Thomas team will hold monthly Project Development Team (PDT) design coordination meetings. The location for the meetings will be at a location to be determined by City of Union City. The meetings will include a video capable conference link for remote attendance. For each meeting, Mark Thomas will prepare and submit: an agenda, a status of submittals register; a data request log of information requested and provided to others; and meeting minutes. The agenda outline will cover cost, schedule and scope issues.

The submittals register and data request log will be presented and reviewed at each meeting to highlight due dates and prevent schedule slippage. The submittals register will highlight outstanding issues and responses to action items.

Task 1.1.8. City Meetings
Mark Thomas will present at two (2) City publicly noticed design update meetings that are for the benefit of the public, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit advocates. These meetings will be held at City BPAC meetings. The purpose of these meetings are to present updates to the public during the design phase and to receive feedback and answer questions from the public about the design elements.

Task 1.1.9. Invoice and Progress Reports
Mark Thomas will prepare and submit budgets, monthly progress and performance reports, and invoices.

Task 1.1.10. Correspondence
Mark Thomas will prepare and submit correspondence and memos, including all meeting minutes.

Task 1.1.11. Quality Control / Quality Assurance
The Mark Thomas team will implement quality control and quality assurance procedures for design activities. This includes performing in-house quality control reviews for reports and task deliverables prior to major milestone deliverables. This includes a two-step procedure of redlines and verification of incorporated comments. Quality Control documentation will be submitted to the City upon request.

DELIVERABLES
• Meeting agendas and minutes (up to 18 meetings - Stakeholder and PDT) • Union City BPAC Meeting attendance and presentation (up to 2) • Invoice and Progress Reports (monthly)
• Project CPM Schedule Updates (monthly)
• All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 6 of 23 ends

TASK 4. ENGINEERING REPORTS
Task 4.1. Engineering Reports – All Phases
Task 4.1.3. Hydromodification Report
Mark Thomas will confirm adequacy of Hydromodification Report prepared in Phase 2 for this project and document final hydromodification design in the Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) for Phase 1 Project.

Task 4.1.5. Hydrology Analysis
Mark Thomas will update Hydrology Report utilizing the Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) hydrologic model developed in the previous phase of the Project based on current methods per the Alameda County Hydrology & Hydraulics Manual (2018) for Phase 1 Project.

Mark Thomas will model the system function in a 1-dimensional unsteady flow PCSWMM model for use as inputs to the Hydrologic Engineering Center's River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) model for Line M Channel. The PCSWMM models will include all 4 phases of QLP with major on-site drainage facilities, proposed pump stations, and the detention basin. Tailwater for the PCSWMM models will assume free outfall to Old Alameda Creek.

Line M Channel will be design to withhold 100 Year Storm Event. The Line M Channel and overflow pipe design are subject to review and approval by ACFCD. In addition to the report, to facilitate ACFCD review and approval, a separate submittal plan package to ACFCD will be prepared which will include title sheet, typical sections, Line M Channel, drainage plans.

These additional analyses will be documented in the Drainage Report.

Task 4.2. Engineering Reports Phase 1
Task 4.2.1. Hazardous Materials Report
As part of the Mark Thomas team, Fugro will develop a hazardous materials boundary and identify other pertinent areas of concern within QLP Phase 1. This file will be provided as a GIS layer and referenced in the plans.

Task 4.2.2. Materials/Geotechnical Report
As a part of the Mark Thomas team, Parikh Consultants, Inc (PARIKH) will prepare a Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) that includes Line M Channel and Pavement Design & Materials Report (PD&MR) or Pavement Memo for final design. For Phase 1 roadway design, Mark Thomas will summarize the findings, soil data, engineering recommendations, and review comments/updates in a final Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) for the City and agencies to review. At the junction of future QLP and Mission Blvd. (Caltrans jurisdiction), the latest Caltrans guidelines require preparation of either a Pavement Design & Materials Report (PD&MR) or a Pavement Memo. The soil boring logs will be prepared in Caltrans Logs of Test Boring (LOTB), 11” x 17” format.

Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 7 of 23 ends

The geotechnical work will include interaction with the designer and agencies, incorporating review comments/updates from the preliminary design, inclusion of the available soil data, engineering analyses, design coordination, and submittal of final reports.

Task 4.2.4 Other Reports
Task 4.2.4.1 Drainage Report
Mark Thomas will finalize the Drainage Report that was prepared during 30% and 65% design phase and produce a Final Drainage Report which will include Line M Hydrology Analysis section. The results and design recommendations will be summarized in the Drainage Report and will include construction implementation of the drainage systems.

The report is expected to include an evaluation of the existing facilities and proposed conditions, unusual and special conditions, drainage mapping, hydraulic analyses, and documentation of the drainage design decision made as part of Pre-Design Report (PDR) Process.

Task 4.2.4.2 Stormwater Management Plan and Hydromodification Report Mark Thomas will finalize Stormwater Management Plan summarizing the Project impacts to water quality, recommended BMPs and Hydromodification Management measures for only Phase 1. The study will address the impacts from roadway improvements, and will utilize guidance from the City, Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program, and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Hydromodification management measures will be evaluated by updating the calculations prepared for the 30% conceptual design in Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM). The hydraulic design of the measures will be summarized and documented in the Drainage report.

Mark Thomas will update the Stormwater Management Plan to document the risk of the Project and the new BMPs to be implemented; and provide preliminary cost estimates for additional Inspections/Monitoring/Sampling/Rain Event Action Plan, as applicable, based on the risk assessment of the Project.

DELIVERABLES
• Hazardous Materials Boundary (in GIS)
• Draft and Final GDR and PD&MR or Pavement Memo
• Draft and Final Drainage Report
• Draft and Final Stormwater Management Plan and Hydromodification Report • All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 8 of 23 ends

TASK 5. RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING
Task 5.1 and 5.2 Surveys
The Mark Thomas team will perform additional field survey required for the project. With City approval, Mark Thomas will perform additional topographic survey required for QLP Phase 1. It is assumed additional topographic surveys are limited to fifteen (15) days of field time. The City will provide all access and necessary permits at no cost to Mark Thomas.

Task 5.3 Right-of-Way (R/W) Engineering and Support Services

5.3.1 R/W Engineering: R/W engineering tasks include the following:
a) Prepare right-of-way exhibits delineating existing right of way, property owner data and PG&E overhead easement. This existing map will be overlayed showing proposed right of way changes, table showing property owners, before and after acreages.
b) Prepare plats and descriptions for right of way transfers and relinquishment for Alameda County Flood Control District
c) Prepare plats and descriptions for PG&E easement impacted by this project

5.3.2 Parcel Map: Mark Thomas will prepare tentative and final parcel map as follows:
a) Perform field survey to locate and verify found monuments. b) Review and verify preliminary Title Reports for Phase 1 Parcels. c) Prepare draft tentative parcel map for City review.
d) Update and incorporate City’s comments and produce final tentative map for City approval process.
e) Once the tentative map is approved, Mark Thomas will prepare the final parcel map for recordation. Parcel map will delineate all new monuments to be installed.

Final monumentation will be completed during construction after the monument boxes are installed.

5.3.3 Support Services
As part of the Mark Thomas team, ARWS will provide R/W support services that include appraising the Alameda County Flood Control District (ACFCD) parcels that will be part of a R/W transfer between Union City and ACFCD. The Mark Thomas team will lead the R/W coordination effort as follows:

1. Setup coordination meetings with ACFCD
a. For R/W impacted by this project
b. For Line M and overflow pipe construction, maintenance and ownership

2. Setup coordination meetings with PG&E to right of way impacted for PG&E

DELIVERABLES
• Supplemental topographic survey (up to 15 days)
• R/W coordination meeting agenda and minutes
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 9 of 23 ends

• R/W Exhibits, Legal Descriptions/Plats, Tentative Map and Final Parcel Map • Appraisals for ACFCD property
• All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless otherwise specified TASK 6. 35% AND 65% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION
35% PS&E was completed and submitted on April 12, 2025 and 65% PS&E was completed and submitted on May 1, 2025.

TASK 8: FINAL PS&E - BID READY
Final design will be based on updating the 65% PS&E including incorporating comments from City and other impacted agencies to produce bid ready PS&E documents.

Utility Coordination and Risk Management
Utility Mapping
The Mark Thomas team will finalize utility mapping based on input from utility companies, field reviews, potholing, and topographic surveys to reflect the existing conditions. The PS&E documents will identify high-risk utilities in conformance with Caltrans standards.

Utility mapping along Mission Blvd, a Caltrans facility, will be mapped in conformance with Caltrans standard.

Utility Design and Conflict Evaluation
The Mark Thomas team will work with design team and utility companies to resolve any and all conflicts and update plans to incorporate comments. A separate memo will be prepared to documents all utility conflicts and resolutions, particularly to existing joint trench on 7th Street and services to City Corporation Yard.

Risk Management
Mark Thomas will prepare Risk Register utilizing Caltrans’ Risk Register forms (or approved equivalent by the City) within 10 working days from NTP anticipated in March 2026. The risk register will be updated on a monthly basis and reviewed at the monthly PDT meetings.

Plans, Specifications, Estimate and Bid Support
The Mark Thomas team will prepare final design based on comments received on the 65% design documents.

Submittals will be made at 95%, 100% and Bid Ready document submittal.

The final PS&E will be prepared as a detailed, complete set of plans, technical specifications and estimate. The Mark Thomas team will provide responses to comments and attend a comment review/ resolution meeting at the outset of the 65% PS&E task.

Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 10 of 23 ends

The table below is an estimation of the sheet count anticipated for Phase 1. In general, drawings will be based on Caltrans Plans Preparation Manual (PPM) unless superseded by third party agency requirements or modified by the City.

Sheet
Count
Sheet Type
1 Title
1 General Notes
5 Typical Sections
1 Key Map and Line Index
1 Project Control
10 Demolition Plan
10 Tree Preservation and Removal Plan
5 Layouts
3 Profiles
15 Construction Details
15 Water Pollution Control Plans, Details and Quantities 7 Drainage Layouts
8 Drainage Profiles
10 Drainage Details and Quantities
5 ACFCD Line M Plans, Details and Quantities
5 ACFCD Overflow Plans Details and Quantities
12 Erosion Control Plans and Quantities
8 Utility Plan (ACWD and PG&E) and Profile
10 Utility Details and Quantities
5 Stage Construction
25 Traffic Handling
3 Stage Construction Details and Quantities
10 Sign and Striping Plans
2 Sign and Striping Details and Quantities
20 Electrical Plans, Details and Quantities
15 Summary of Quantities
30 Landscape, Irrigation Plans, Details & Quantities
15 Standard Plans (City and Caltrans)
257 Total
Caltrans Encroachment Permit
1) In addition to above drawing list, a separate PS&E package will be prepared for Mission Blvd. in conformance with Caltrans’ standard for encroachment permit.

This package will include title sheet identifying work within Caltrans’ right of way, typical sections, layout, electrical, signal, staging, landscaping, etc. for work on Mission Blvd.

Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 11 of 23 ends

2) Mark Thomas will submit draft PS&E along with Caltrans Encroachment Permit Application.
3) Mark Thomas will coordinate and manage encroachment permit process and secure encroachment permit from Caltrans on behalf of City of Union City.

Alameda County Flood Control District Encroachment Permit 1) In addition to above drawing list, a separate PS&E package will be prepared for submittal to ACFCD) for encroachment permit. This package will include title sheet, typical sections, Line M and related drainage features. 2) Mark Thomas will submit draft PS&E along with ACFCD Encroachment Permit Application.
3) Mark Thomas will coordinate and manage encroachment permit process and secure encroachment permit on behalf of City of Union City.

Civil and Structures Design
Mark Thomas will have overall responsibility for the completion of the PS&E documents for Phase 1 project. Mark Thomas will prepare the general civil, drainage and structures elements of the project and coordinate the design of other elements with their team of specialized subconsultants.

Mark Thomas will revise and update the drainage plans including design of relocated Line M and grading plan of the existing Basin 2C, erosion control plans, water pollution control plans based on the comments received on the 35% and 65% submittal.

Utility Design
The Mark Thomas team will prepare utility plans to current City Public Works and Caltrans standards using Civil 3D and AutoCAD. Telephone service drop locations will be verified and coordinated with the telephone service company. Any connection or application fees for electrical and telephone service will be paid for by the City.

For the dry utility plans & details, all specific details necessary for the relocation of any affected utilities on existing 7th Street will be designed and provided to the Mark Thomas team by the utility owner (i.e. PG&E, AT&T, Comcast, etc.) for reference in the design documents. The scope includes sewer and water systems. Utilities will be graphically shown and coordinated with each utility company and will be shown on the composite utility plans with clear symbology and line weights; labels for owner, size and material; and cross-referenced gravity systems such as drainage and sewer lines shown on the plan, profiles and cross-sections. High risk overhead and underground utilities will be designated on the plans and in the specifications.

This effort will include utility coordination efforts as follows:

1. Agencies: Alameda County Water District, PG&E, AT&T/Cable

2. Setup and manage coordination meetings for design and for project approval with impacted agencies.

Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 12 of 23 ends

3. Prepare notices for relocation and associated applications.

4. Assist City with drafting utility agreements and prepare exhibits for attachments to the agreements.

Signal and Lighting Design
As a part of the Mark Thomas team, Bennet will prepare final plans, specifications, and cost estimates (PS&E) for electrical items on QLP/Mission Blvd. Temporary traffic signal modification for construction staging may be required. This signal PS&E will be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval.

Landscape Architecture and Urban Design
As a part of the Mark Thomas team, MIG Design will finalize landscape and irrigation elements of the project. The design will be based on comments from 65% submittal.

Specifications
The Mark Thomas team will prepare specifications in a hybrid format using both City standard format and Caltrans standard specification for the technical special provisions.

Front end “boilerplate” and contract documentation will be provided by the City.

Engineer's Estimate
The Mark Thomas team will prepare an opinion of probable construction costs broken down into unit costs as appropriate for the design and items of work.

Prepare Final Plans, Specifications and Estimate
A final Mark Thomas’ internal quality assurance/ quality control (QA/ QC) review of documents will be performed before submitting to the City. Final submittal will be a twostep process. First submittal will be at 100% design completed with internal QC completed. City will review this package and provide any comments if any. The final submittal step will be bid ready set.

Prepare Final Plans and Estimates
The final design task provides for the preparation of the final design plans and opinion of probable construction cost for the Project. Mark Thomas will coordinate the resolution of outstanding design issues and respond to one round of City consolidated comments received on the 95% PS&E. Quantities will be recalculated based on the updated design.

This task includes a meeting with the City to go through the Project parameters, definition of a checklist of the Project deliverables and preparation of the Final Construction Documents for submittal to the City.

Prepare Final Special Provisions
Mark Thomas will revise the technical special provisions to account for changes in the plans and opinion of probable construction cost as well as to address comments received on the 95% technical special provisions.

Bid Support
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 13 of 23 ends

Mark Thomas will provide support during the bidding phase of the Project once it is advertised. This will consist of responding to City questions during bid preparation, and answering questions from bidders or the City to clarify plans and/ or specifications. If addendum are required, Mark Thomas will take the lead in drafting the addendum for City’s review and updating the addendum, which will be issued by the City to the prospective bidders.

DELIVERABLES
• 95% and 100% Comment Response Matrix
• 95%, 100% and Bid Ready PS&E
• All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise • Project Deliverables Checklist and Construction Documents (1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy)
• Addendum as required (draft and final version)
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 14 of 23 ends

EXHIBIT A-1

SCHEDULE
Activity Date
NTP for Amendment 5 Final Design
Phase 1
March 12, 2026
Complete appraisal and submit draft R/W
transfer documents to City
July 15, 2026
City to provide draft R/W documents to
ACFCD and PG&E
July 25, 2026
Submit Final R/W transfer documents to
City
September 12, 2026
City submit R/W transfer documents to
ACFCD and for utilization of PG&E
easement for relocated Line M
September 22, 2026
Submit 95% PS&E & Permit Applications
for Caltrans and ACFCD to City
December 10, 2026
City submit permit applications to
Caltrans and ACFCD
December 20, 2026
Submit 100% PS&E March 1, 2027
Permits secured from Caltrans and
ACFCD
April 30, 2027
Final PS&E Ready for Bidding June 5, 2027
Estimated Construction Start November 1, 2027
Construction End December 20, 2029
Project Close-out February 12, 2030
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 15 of 23 ends

EXHIBIT A-2
STAFFING PLAN - PHASE 1
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 16 of 23 ends

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION AND RATE SCHEDULE
Task No. Task Description Task Budget
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design $80,000

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants/Code/Std Compliance $15,000

1.1.4 Maintain Project files $5,000

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule $7,000

1.1.6 Design Coordination Meetings $15,000

1.1.7 Project Development Meetings $15,000

1.1.8 City Meetings $10,000

1.1.9 Invoice and Progress Reports $10,000

1.1.10 Correspondence $35,000

1.1.11 Quality Control/Quality Assurance $80,000
4 ENGINEERING REPORTS

4.1.5 Final Drainage Report $20,000

4.2.1 Final Hazardous Materials Report $5,000

4.2.2 Final Materials/Geotechnical Report $10,000

4.2.5 Final Stormwater Management Plan and Hydromodification Reports $20,000
5 R/W Engineering

5.1 Field survey $35,000

5.2 Final Parcel Map $35,000
8 FINAL PS&E - BID READY

8.2 Plans $1,923,000
Project specifications and Estimate $100,000
Bid Phase and Project Award Phase Coordination $30,000
Review 95% and 100% comments and prepare matrix for
resolution $20,000
Plan Review Permit Fees for ACFCD, PG&E and ACWD $108,000 TOTAL $2,578,000.00
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 17 of 23 ends

Hourly Rate Schedule by Firm
Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
($) ($) ($)
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
01/01/26-
06/30/26
07/01/26-
06/30/27
07/01/27-
06/30/28
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Sasha Dansky* Principal-in-Charge $488.43 $512.85 $538.49 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Shawn O'Keefe* Principal-in-Charge/ Project Manager $454.73 $477.47 $501.34 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Etty Mercurio* Sr. Engineering Manager $430.76 $452.30 $474.92 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Engineer $193.68 $203.36 $213.53 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Project Engineer $176.84 $185.68 $194.96 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Design Engineer II $138.11 $145.02 $152.27 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Design Engineer I $126.32 $132.64 $139.27 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Manager $340.35 $357.37 $375.24 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Engineer $239.45 $251.42 $263.99 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Project Engineer $209.67 $220.15 $231.16 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Design Engineer II $182.33 $191.45 $201.02 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Technician $184.76 $194.00 $203.70 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Deputy District Manager $315.28 $331.04 $347.59 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD CM Division Manager $325.93 $342.23 $359.34 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Operations Manager $244.08 $256.28 $269.09 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD LAUD Division Manager $264.86 $278.10 $292.01 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Engineering Manager $441.97 $464.07 $487.27 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Survey Division Manager $370.52 $389.05 $408.50 Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 18 of 23 ends

Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
($) ($) ($)
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
01/01/26-
06/30/26
07/01/26-
06/30/27
07/01/27-
06/30/28
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Survey Manager $242.53 $254.66 $267.39 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Surveyor $208.85 $219.29 $230.25 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Surveyor $178.53 $187.46 $196.83 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Lead Survey Technician $202.11 $212.22 $222.83 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Survey Technician $144.85 $152.09 $159.69 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD 2 Person Field Crew $377.51 $396.39 $416.21 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Coordinator $161.68 $169.76 $178.25 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Assistant $128.01 $134.41 $141.13 Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. Steve Castellano* Managing Consultant $219.30 $230.27 $241.78 Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. James Richards Managing Consultant $259.25 $272.21 $285.82 Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. Matthew Schock Managing Consultant $259.08 $272.03 $285.63 Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. TBD Consultant III $228.06 $239.46 $251.43
Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. TBD Consultant II $162.91 $171.06 $179.61
Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. TBD Consultant I $130.32 $136.84 $143.68
Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. TBD Appraiser III $244.35 $256.57 $269.40
Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. TBD Appraiser II $211.76 $222.35 $233.47
Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 19 of 23 ends

Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
($) ($) ($)
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
01/01/26-
06/30/26
07/01/26-
06/30/27
07/01/27-
06/30/28
Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. TBD Appraiser I $162.91 $171.06 $179.61
Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. TBD Right of Way Technician $114.03 $119.73 $125.72 Associated Right of Way Services,
Inc. TBD Administrative Support $114.03 $119.73 $125.72 CSW|ST2 Michael Vidra Sr. Project Manager $257.37 $270.24 $283.75 CSW|ST2 Robert Stevens Sr. Project Manager $257.37 $270.24 $283.75 CSW|ST2 Cristopher Ethier Engineer II $184.50 $193.73 $203.42 CSW|ST2 Alisson Avancini Engineer I $125.45 $131.72 $138.31 CSW|ST2 Joseph Gebre Engineer I $121.77 $127.86 $134.25 CSW|ST2 Zhihong Huang Engineer II $140.22 $147.23 $154.59 Fugro USA Land, Inc. Jeriann Alexander Principal Engineer/Hazardous Materials Specialist $361.85 $379.94 $398.94
Fugro USA Land, Inc. Karen Emery-Tonkovich Principal Geologist/Hazardous Materials Specialist $284.46 $298.68 $313.61
Fugro USA Land, Inc. Ecem Isleyen Senior Geologist/GIS Specialist $187.58 $196.96 $206.81 Fugro USA Land, Inc. Marissa McCallum Senior Editor/Word Processing $142.04 $149.14 $156.60 Guida Surveying, Inc. Lisa Spivak Survey Manager $398.79 $418.73 $439.67 Guida Surveying, Inc. Justin Height Sr. Project Surveyor $302.23 $317.34 $333.21 Guida Surveying, Inc. Jonathon Correa Sr. Project Surveyor $272.84 $286.48 $300.80 Guida Surveying, Inc. Project Surveyor Project Surveyor $230.87 $242.41 $254.53 Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 20 of 23 ends

Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
($) ($) ($)
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
01/01/26-
06/30/26
07/01/26-
06/30/27
07/01/27-
06/30/28
Guida Surveying, Inc. Joe Vargas Field Supervisor $228.77 $240.21 $252.22 Guida Surveying, Inc. Sr. Survey Analyst Sr. Survey Analyst $209.88 $220.37 $231.39 Guida Surveying, Inc. Survey Analyst Survey Analyst $188.90 $198.35 $208.27 Guida Surveying, Inc. Survey Technician Survey Technician $146.92 $154.27 $161.98 Guida Surveying, Inc. Survey Clerical Survey Clerical $125.93 $132.23 $138.84 Guida Surveying, Inc. Party Chief† Party Chief† $212.70 $223.34 $234.51 Guida Surveying, Inc. Chainman† Chainman† $183.27 $192.43 $202.05 Guida Surveying, Inc. Apprentice† Apprentice† $146.62 $153.95 $161.65 HDR Engineering, Inc. Han-Bin Liang Principal Engineer $381.14 $400.20 $420.21 HDR Engineering, Inc. Analette Ochoa Principal Engineer $352.57 $370.20 $388.71 HDR Engineering, Inc. TBD Supervising Engineer $306.52 $321.85 $337.94 HDR Engineering, Inc. Jennifer Abrams Senior Lead Civil Engineer $238.23 $250.14 $262.65 HDR Engineering, Inc. Raja Periketi, Kazuya
Tsurushita Senior Civil Engineer $239.99 $251.99 $264.59 HDR Engineering, Inc. Andrew Chin Senior Civil Designer $181.68 $190.76 $200.30 HDR Engineering, Inc. Patrick Yim Staff Civil EIT II $148.65 $156.08 $163.88 HDR Engineering, Inc. Alejandra Rodriguez Coss Y
Leon Staff Civil EIT I $132.13 $138.74 $145.68
HDR Engineering, Inc. TBD Staff Civil EIT $132.13 $138.74 $145.68 HDR Engineering, Inc. Christine Boschen Senior Env. Scientist $150.74 $158.28 $166.19 HDR Engineering, Inc. Ashley Chan, Jada Golland Env. Scientist II $132.13 $138.74 $145.68 Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 21 of 23 ends

Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
($) ($) ($)
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
01/01/26-
06/30/26
07/01/26-
06/30/27
07/01/27-
06/30/28
HDR Engineering, Inc. Mei Du Senior Technician $112.58 $118.21 $124.12 HDR Engineering, Inc. TBD Technical Editor/Project Coordinator $106.33 $111.65 $117.23 ICF Rich Walter Project Director $345.21 $362.47 $380.59 ICF Danielle Tannourji Project Manager/Permit Lead $189.93 $199.43 $209.40 ICF Lindsay Christensen CEQA Lead $164.92 $173.17 $181.83 ICF Jennifer Ostner Deputy Project Manager $142.29 $149.40 $156.87 ICF Jennifer Haire Wildlife Biology $214.84 $225.58 $236.86 ICF Torrey Edell Botany $165.23 $173.49 $182.16
ICF Kevin Mackay Restoration Design $312.53 $328.16 $344.57 ICF James Elder Archaeology $215.03 $225.78 $237.07
ICF Jennifer Wildt Archaeology $182.74 $191.88 $201.47
ICF Jonathon Rusch Architectural History $146.48 $153.80 $161.49 ICF Alan Barnard Graphics $177.79 $186.68 $196.01
ICF Melissa Johnson GIS $145.46 $152.73 $160.37
ICF Heather Hammermeister Editing $150.65 $158.18 $166.09 ICF Anthony Ha Word Processing $141.11 $148.17 $155.58
PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. G. PARIKH * PIC $363.57 $381.75 $400.84 PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. D. WANG * PROJECT MANAGER & QA-QC $263.51 $276.69 $290.52 PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. F. WANG * SEN. PROJECT ENGINEER $243.38 $255.55 $268.33 Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 22 of 23 ends

Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
($) ($) ($)
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
01/01/26-
06/30/26
07/01/26-
06/30/27
07/01/27-
06/30/28
PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. J. TURBAY Project Engineer $201.58 $211.66 $222.24 PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Staff Engineer Staff Engineer $134.95 $141.70 $148.79 PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Field Engineer Field Engineer $178.69 $187.62 $197.00 PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. C. Langbein Project Geologist $162.87 $171.01 $179.56 PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Lab. Technician Lab. Technician $129.08 $135.53 $142.31 PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Draftsperson-CADD Draftsperson-CADD $141.72 $148.81 $156.25 PGAdesign Christopher Kent* Principal $328.72 $345.16 $362.42 PGAdesign Kari Tanaka* Senior Landscape Architect $185.76 $195.05 $204.80 PGAdesign Charla Kaul* Landscape Architect $137.60 $144.48 $151.70 PGAdesign Adrienne Newton* Landscape Designer $130.73 $137.27 $144.13 PGAdesign Robert Towar* Irrigation Designer $157.38 $165.25 $173.51 ROMA Collaborative Ivana Micic * Principal in Charge $291.67 $306.25 $321.56 ROMA Collaborative Mimi Ahn Senior Landscape Architect $267.65 $281.03 $295.08 ROMA Collaborative Erika Cesarino Designer $106.38 $111.70 $117.29 ROMA Collaborative Esther Sam Graphics $173.08 $181.73 $190.82 TDG Engineering Jeremy Chrzan Principal-in-Charge $263.94 $277.14 $291.00 TDG Engineering Cindy Zerger* Project Manager & Design Lead $235.67 $247.45 $259.82 TDG Engineering Jason Fong Project Manager/Senior Engineer $263.73 $276.92 $290.77 TDG Engineering Dylan Passmore Principal Engineer $222.87 $234.01 $245.71 Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Page 23 of 23 ends

Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
Fixed
Hourly
Rate
($) ($) ($)
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
Effective
Period
01/01/26-
06/30/26
07/01/26-
06/30/27
07/01/27-
06/30/28
TDG Engineering Andrew Kotalik Engineer III $170.97 $179.52 $188.50 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Daniel Yau Engineer XII $259.62 $272.60 $286.23 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Kin Chan Engineer XI $240.66 $252.69 $265.32 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Spencer Lee Engineer VII $164.37 $172.59 $181.22 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Jessica Wu Engineer VI $158.05 $165.95 $174.25 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Meng Yang Engineer VI $146.66 $153.99 $161.69 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Shannon Liao Engineer III $91.04 $95.59 $100.37 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc J. Nguyen Engineer I $80.92 $84.97 $89.22 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc A, Huynh Engineer I $80.92 $84.97 $89.22 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Teresa Chan Technician III $67.77 $71.16 $74.72 LEGEND

EXISTING CORP YARD

EXISTING FLOOD CONTROL

EXISTING LOCAL STREET

EXISTING DOG PARK

EXISTING CITY PROPERTY

CITY CORPORATION YARD
NEWARK-JARVIS 115KV

TRANSMISSION LINE

DOG PARK
75' PG&E EASEMENT

EXISTING FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT
0 75 150 300
Feet
SCALE 1" = 150'

EXHIBIT
QLP PHASE 1 EXISTING R/W EXHIBIT Scale:

Date:
1" = 150'
Feb. 2026
Drawn By SMB
Checked By SJZ 701 UNIVERSITY AVE, SUITE 200
SACRAMENTO, CA 95825
LEGEND
PARCEL 1 - CORP YARD REMAINDER
PARCEL 2 - ACFCD R/W IMPACT
PARCEL 3 - QLP & 7TH STREET R/W
PARCEL 4 - PARKING LOT
TAKE FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO QLP R/W 0 75 150 300
Feet
SCALE 1" = 150'
PARCEL 1

DOG PARK
PARCEL 4 AREA TO REMAIN, 2.16 AC
75' PG&E EASEMENT
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3

FUTURE FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT

EXHIBIT
R/W EXHIBIT FOR PHASE 1 QLP
Scale:

Date:
1" = 150'
Feb. 2026
Drawn By SMB
Checked By SJZ 701 UNIVERSITY AVE, SUITE 200
SACRAMENTO, CA 95825
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE FIFTH

AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,578,000, FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $10,567,191, FOR THE FINAL DESIGN OF PHASE (SEGMENT) 1 OF THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04
WHEREAS, in 2018, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) approved the request from the City of Union City to be the project sponsor for the remaining phases of the I-880 to Mission Boulevard/East West Connector Project and to update the project description eligible for the remaining commitment from the 1986 Measure B Transportation Expenditure Plan to reflect the name change to “Quarry Lakes Parkway Project”; and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5444- 19, which authorized the renaming of the I-880 to Mission Boulevard/East West Connector Project to the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, is funded with 1986 Measure B funds, 2014 Measure BB funds, and other transportation funds administered by Alameda CTC; and
WHEREAS, the City of Union City has accepted over $9.0 million from the Alameda CTC Project Funding Agreement (PFA) No. A22-0053 for the Final Design of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04 (see Exhibit A for City Council Actions regarding the Project Funding for this project); and WHEREAS, in the City of Union City Strategic Plan, the City Council highlights the Project in Goal C, Strategy 2: Facilitate the build out of the greater Station District Area through the construction of the Quarry Lakes Parkway, completion of the pedestrian rail crossing, and implementing the recommendations of the Southern Alameda County Regional Rail Integration Study to make the Station District a passenger rail hub served by ACE; and
WHEREAS, the Project consists of the Quarry Lakes Parkway (QLP) in Union City and the Decoto Road Complete Streets Project in Fremont, which the City of Fremont will implement; and
WHEREAS, QLP in Union City consists of Phase 1: 7th Street Connection, Phase 2: Gateway Connection, Phase 3: 11th Street Connection, and Phase 4: Grade Separations and Alvarado-Niles Connection. Phase 5: Paseo Padre Parkway and Bike Trail Connection is located in both the cities of Union City and Fremont; and Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve Fifth Amendment to Mark Thomas CSA for Phase 1

Page 2 of 4 ends

WHEREAS, Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. has been the selected engineering firm since 2022 for the Preliminary Design (35% Design) of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phases 1-4, and for the Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phases 1 and 2 (see Exhibit B for City Council Actions for these Consultant Services Agreements); and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025- 117, authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fourth Amendment to the Consultant Service Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of $2,988,000, for a total contract amount of $7,989,191, for the Final Design of Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04; and WHEREAS, the Final Design of Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway included defining the required public right-of-way on the former Caltrans parcels for Quarry Lakes Parkway between Old Alameda Creek and Alvarado-Niles Road and Quarry Lakes Drive between Isherwood Drive in Fremont and Quarry Lakes Parkway; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025- 146, authorizing the dedication of City-Owned Land As Right-of-Way, Landscape Easement, and Public Utility Easement (PUE) for Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, and authorizing the City Manager to accept such dedication; and
WHEREAS, on January 29, 2026, the Public Right-of-Way Dedication, Public Utility Easement (PUE), and Landscape Easement Dedication required for the construction of Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, was recorded at the Alameda County Clerk-Recorder’s Office (see Exhibit C and Exhibit D); and
WHEREAS, the Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2, also included preparation of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Addendum of the 2009 East West Connector Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phases 1-4 in Union City, which documents the project changes, reevaluates the environmental impacts, and identifies the required mitigation and permits before construction of the project can begin; and
WHEREAS, the Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2, also included completion of the overall hydrology, hydraulics, and drainage analysis for Phases 1-4 within Union City and includes the design of the Alameda County Flood Control’s Line M Flood Control Channel realignment next to the Corporation Yard within Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, as well as the Line M overflow drainage system connecting to the Flood Control Channel, originating in Phase 1, flowing through Phases 3 and 4, and discharging into Old Alameda Creek in Phase 2; and
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve Fifth Amendment to Mark Thomas CSA for Phase 1

Page 2 of 4 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve Fifth Amendment to Mark Thomas CSA for Phase 1

Page 3 of 4 ends

WHEREAS, the 65% Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimate (PS&E) for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, was submitted to the City, Alameda CTC, Alameda County Flood Control District, Alameda County Water District, Union Sanitary District, PG&E, other utilities, and Caltrans on April 30, 2025; the design was put on hold until the overall hydrology, hydraulics, and drainage analysis for Phases 1-4 within Union City was completed; and
WHEREAS, on February 10, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026- 017, accepting $16,728,000 from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, of which $2,578,000 is allocated to the Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 (see Exhibit E for RM3 Allocation Letter); and
WHEREAS, the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of $2,578,000, will allow them to complete the Final Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimate for Phase 1 of Quarry Lakes Parkway by updating the 65% PS&E, incorporating review comments received from the City, Alameda County Flood Control, the utility companies, and the regulatory agencies (see Phase 1 Title Sheet in Exhibit F); and
WHEREAS, the Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, includes the new multimodal roadway from 7th Street to Mission Boulevard, the realignment of the Line M Flood Control Channel to accommodate the new roadway, the reconstruction and relocation of the southern portion of the City’s Corporation Yard security wall, the Line M overflow drainage system, the realignment of 7th Street along the front of the Corporation Yard from Zwissig Way to the new road, the new parking lot next to Drigon Dog Park, and the new Class I multi-use trail along Mission Boulevard connecting Quarry Lakes Parkway to Holly Leaf Lane; and
WHEREAS, the Final PS&E of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, is scheduled for completion and bid in Summer 2027, with contract award anticipated by early Fall 2027, construction beginning early 2028, and completion expected by the end of 2029; and WHEREAS, the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., for Final Design of Phase (Segment) 1 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, in the amount of $2,578,000, will be funded with the Capital Projects Grants Fund (Account Number 410-91804-57128).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount for $2,578,000, for the Final Design of Phase (Segment) 1 for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, for a total contract amount of $10,567,191.

Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve Fifth Amendment to Mark Thomas CSA for Phase 1

Page 3 of 4 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve Fifth Amendment to Mark Thomas CSA for Phase 1

Page 4 of 4 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on March 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – List of Alameda CTC Council Actions

2. Exhibit B – List of Mark Thomas Council Actions

3. Exhibit C - Recorded Public Roadway for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1

4. Exhibit D - Recorded Landscape and PUE for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1

5. Exhibit E - MTC RM3 Allocation Letter

6. Exhibit F – Title Sheet (65%) for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 RESO # DATE RESOLUTION ACTION
5374-18 8/14/2018

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY TO APPROVE

FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMISSION AND THE CITY OF UNION CITY FOR I-880 TO SR 238 (MISSION BLVD) EAST WEST CONNECTOR; APPROVE TWO AGREEMENTS FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING

SERVICES WITH UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD IN CONJUNCTION WITH SEGMENT C OF THE EAST WEST CONNECTOR IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $100,000 EACH;

APPROVE DESIGN AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF UNION CITY AND SAN FRANCISCO

BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEGMENT C OF THE EAST WEST CONNECTOR PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $605,000; APPROVE

CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF UNION CITY AND TYLIN FOR VALUE ENGINNERING SERVICES FOR THE QUA CITY PROJECT 18-04, IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,000; AND APPROPRIATE $2,500,000 FROM THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 4100 TO CITY PROJECT 18-04
5504-19 7/9/2019

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY DECLARING A PUBLIC

PURPOSE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN EXCESS ROUTE 84 PROPERTIES 5720-21 3/9/2021

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE

EXECUTION OF A PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT AND THE COMMITMENT OF FUNDING FROM THE 2014 MEASURE BB TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR

THE DUMBARTON CORRIDOR AREA TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04 5721-21 3/9/2021

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE

EXECUTION OF A PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT AND THE COMMITMENT OF FUNDING FROM THE 2014 MEASURE BB TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR

THE UNION CITY INTERMODAL STATION PROJECT TO THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04
5841-21 10/12/2021
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY ACCEPTING $4.2

MILLION GRANT FROM ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMMISSION (ALAMEDA CTC), PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. A22-0053 FOR FINAL DESIGN OF PHASES (SEGMENTS) 1 AND 2 FOR QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY (EAST WEST CONNNECTOR) PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04
SUMMARY OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FOR FUNDING (2018-2025) 2025-006 1/14/2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE ALAMEDA COUNTY

TRANSPORATION COMMISSION (ALAMEDA CTC) PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT (PFA) NO. A22-0053, TO ACCEPT AN ADDITIONAL $801,191, FOR A TOTAL PFA OF $5,001,191, FOR THE FINAL DESIGN OF PHASES (SEGMENTS) 1 AND 2 FOR THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY (EAST WEST CONNECTOR) PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18- 04, AND AMENDING THEFY 2024-2025 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BUDGET 2025-007 1/14/2025

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN ALLOCATION REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (MTC) FROM THE REGIONAL MEASURE 3

DUMBARTON CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,507,000, AND ACCEPTING ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S

DESIGNATION OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AS IMPLEMENTING AGENCY FOR THE UNION CITY QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04 2025-087 6/24/2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMMISSION PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. A22-0053 TO ACCEPT AN ADDITIONAL $3,995,000, FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $8,996,191, FOR THE FINAL DESIGN OF PHASE (SEGMENT) 2 FOR THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY (EAST WEST CONNNECTOR) PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04
2025-097 7/8/2025

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN ALLOCATION REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FROM THE REGIONAL MEASURE 3 DUMBARTON

CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND ACCEPTING ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DESIGNATION OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AS

IMPLEMENTING AGENCY FOR THE UNION CITY QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04
RESO # DATE RESOLUTION ACTION
5546-19 12/10/2019

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN ALLOCATION REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FROM THE REGIONAL MEASURE 3 DUMBARTON

CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND ACCEPTING ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DESIGNATION OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AS

IMPLEMENTING AGENCY FOR THE UNION CITY QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04
5681-20 10/27/2020

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN CONSULTANT AGREEEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04 AND TO APPROPRIATE $177,700 FROM DISPA (FUND 4100) AND MEASURE BB (FUND 2545)
5878-22 1/11/2022

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING (30% DESIGN) OF PHASES (SEGMENTS) 1 AND 2 FOR QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY (EAST WEST CONNECTOR), CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04, IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,200,000
6045-22 11/22/2022

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., FOR THE FINAL DESIGN OF PHASES (SEGMENTS) 1 AND 2 FOR QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY (EAST WEST CONNECTOR), CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000,000 6046-22 11/22/2022

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING (30% FINAL DESIGN) OF THE EAST WEST CONNECTOR (QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY, PHASES 3 AND 4) PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,087,600, AND APPROPRIATING $208,760 FROM THE UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE OF THE SB-1 FUND
2025-021 2/11/2025

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $801,191, FOR THE FINAL DESIGN OF PHASES (SEGMENTS) 1 AND 2 FOR THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY (EAST WEST CONNECTOR) PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04, FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $5,001,191
2025-117 8/12/2025

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,988,000, FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $7,989,191, FOR THE FINAL DESIGN OF PHASE (SEGMENT) 2 FOR THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY (EAST WEST CONNECTOR) PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04
SUMMARY OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FOR MARK THOMAS (2019-2025)

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Union City
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587
Attn: City Clerk
Exempt from recording fees per Government Code
§§6103, 27383
CONFORMED COPY- has not been compared with Original.
2026010912 01/29/2026 10:02 AM 11 PGS

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY

MELISSA WILK, CLERK-RECORDER
RECORDING FEES: $0.00
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE)
APN: 87-11-17-6, 87-11-15-14. 87-11-17-7, 87-11-15-15, 87-11-16-3 The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s)
Documentary transfer tax is $0 SECTION 11922 R & T CODE: GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY ACQUIRING TITLE City Transfer Tax: $0.00
[] computed on full value of property conveyed, or
[] computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale,

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
The City of Union City ("City") does hereby dedicate for the use and benefit of the public as a right-of-way for public street purposes and incidents and appurtenances thereto, over, under, along and across all that real property situated in the City of Union City, County of Alameda, State of California as described and depicted in Exhibit A- Legal Description & Exhibit B- Plat to Accompany Legal Description, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

CITY OF UNION CIT, CONE,
a California municipal corporation
EXHIBIT "A"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that property situate in the City of Union City, County of Alameda, State of California, being a portion ofthose lands described in that Director's Deed recorded on July 29, 2021, as Document Number 2021262264 and that Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions recorded November 9, 1972, in Reel 3273, Image 718 as Document Number 72-152997, Official Records of said County, more particularly described as follows:

COMMENCING at a found 2 ½ inch brass disk with no stamp in a well set to mark the northerly terminus ofthat line shown as "N33º31 '20"E 189.06' M-M" on Tract 3835 recorded on June 29, 1977 in Book 95 of Maps at Pages 88 to 92 in the Office of the Recorder of said County which bears South 15°05'13" West, 638.77 feet from a found 2 ½ inch brass disk with no stamp in a well shown as found standard city monument on Alvarado-Niles Road near the intersection of Osprey Drive on said Tract 3835;
thence South 08° 27' 17" West, 102.63 feet to the westerly line of said Director's Deed, said line also being common to the easterly line of said Tract 3835, and also being the POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence along said common line, North 16º17'40" East, 750.24 feet to the southerly line of an existing road easement recorded December 18, 1958, in Book 8880 at Page 35 in the Official Records of said County;
thence along said southerly line, South 69º56'33" East, 736.87 feet; thence leaving said southerly line, South 16º18'27" West, 84.94 feet; thence South 49º53'02" East, 57.39 feet;
thence North 56º35'07" West, 51.52 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 404.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 15º31 '43 ", an arc distance of 109 .49 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 496.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 09°11'03", an arc distance of 79.51 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 1276.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 08°04'35", an arc distance of 179.86 feet; thence North 71 º08'30" West, 6.03 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 6.00 feet, with a radial bearing of North 18º43'23" East; thence along said curve through a central angle of 88°40'24", an arc distance of 9.29 feet to the beginning of a compound curve to the left, having a radius of3,775.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 01 º24'46", an arc distance of93.08 feet; thence South 18°38'13" West, 83.62 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 218.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 13°28'05", an arc distance of 51.24 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 182.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 13°28'05", an arc distance of 42.78 feet; thence South 18º38'13" West, 583.36 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 12.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 90º00'00", an arc distance of 18.85 feet; thence South 71 º21 '47" East, 254.58 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1426.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 43°40'09", an arc distance of 1086.86 feet to a point on the boundary ofthe City of Union City;
thence along said City boundary, South 16º05'23" West, 70.27 feet; #
thence North 73º58'54" West, 41.36 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 639.00 feet, with a radial bearing ofNorth 62°36'27" East; thence leaving said City boundary, along said curve through a central angle of 07º12'59", an arc distance of 80.48 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of I 08.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 19°24'35", an arc distance of 36.59 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 92.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 17º42' 17", an arc distance of 28.43 feet to the beginning of a compound curve to the left, having a radius of 1352.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 38º27'34", an arc distance of907.52 feet; thence North 71 º21 '47" West, 235.93 feet;
thence South 18º38'13" West, 16.00 feet;
2 thence North 71º21 '47" West, 18.65 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of

12.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 90°00'00", an arc distance of 18.85 feet; thence South 18º38'13" West, 28.07 feet:
thence North 71 º2 l '47" West, 124.00 feet;
thence North 10º34'35" East, 57.05 feet;
thence North 18º38'13" East, 885.17 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of

40.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 15º46'06", an arc distance of 11.01 feet; thence North 02º52'07" East, 24.99 feet;
thence North 19º49'06" East, I 3.23 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of I 0.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 89º05'50", an arc distance of 15.55 feet; thence North 69°16'44" West, 149.16 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 94º25'3 7", an arc distance of 41.20 feet; thence South 16º 17'40" West, 497 .15 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet;
thence along said curve through a central angle of 15º34'1 O", an arc distance of 130.43 feet; thence South 31°51 '49" West, 23.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 7.05 acres, more or less.

Subject to covenants, conditions, reservations, restrictions, right-of-way, and easements ofrecord, if any.

Bearings and distances shown are grid based on California Coordinate System of 1983 (1991.35), Zone III. All distances are shown in US Survey Foot. Divide grid distances by 1.0000652 to obtain ground distances.
3 This real property description and accompanied Exhibit "B has been prepared at Mark Thomas by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors' Act.

ANNETTE M. HOVORKA PLS. 8246
1/22/2026
DATE
4 LEGEND
FD 21/2" BRASS DISK WITH

NO STAMP IN A WELL (FD STD
CITY MON PER 95 M 88-92)

POB POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
M MAPS
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o

SEE EASEMENT DETAILS
SHEET 2 OF 4
o DIMENSION POINT
(ZZ] PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
+1 lt-,
cól
,
rrrrr+t
1-I1I,JIil}
r. Ti@l
o..c ¿2/
FD 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WITH • V)

NO STAMP IN A WELL
(NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF /_ _[
M-M LINE PER 95 M 88-92) tj
N
so82717w_X,
102.63° e
°
-sé -Tl
TT

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
'I
-, E

CITY OF UNION CITY

DECLARATION OF COVENANTS,

CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
APN: 87-11-16-3
Doc No0. 72-152997, 0.R
1 \_
@
'-- n>
!__ ]
•
'--
------
."otea _ .
__....:::::,._ _
I
I
I
I
I

I , CITY OF UNION CITY

DIRECTOR'S DEED
APN: 87-11-15-14, 15-15, 17-6 82 17-7
Doc No. 2021262264 >-
-1 1 E>y
l'-- 'h " ¡EE EASEMENT DETAILS U ~
['j' set«or+ zlg
±70kc \ Q 2
ü
"+! 5
I \\\º
El\º
l.' \ \ O
@üjf#y íikés biiv@ET77_y ' [
g6pg'¡
O40),pp55 ,_. 1
s$ 'I
I'
[
I
I
O 150 300 600
L II l j
SCALE 1"= 300'
BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID BASED ON CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (1991.35), ZONE Ill. ALL DISTANCES ARE SHOWN IN US SURVEY FOOT. DIVIDE GRID DISTANCES BY

1.0000652 TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES.

Scale: 1"= 300'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 7 OF 4
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROWPRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\ROW\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_ROW_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR

SOUTHERLY LINE OF EXISTING ROAD
EASEMENT BK 8880, PG 35 O.R.

LEGEND

POB POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
M MAPS
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o DIMENSION POINT
(Z] PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED

CURVE TABLE
R=25.00'
C1 A=9425'37°
L=41.20'
@

ALVARADO NILES ROAD
FD 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WITH
NO STAMP IN A WELLI
I
AI -
I
\
\
\
I
I
(O
l
LI
777771
o, If?
LI
O
/ I I I I d UJ /[O, , ., z
.J
I
u
~
5 SKYLARK DRIVE
I
I
ñ.I
t- ¡
co\
3 zol
-
3º I 2
n[
I
I
I

COMMON LINE BETWEEN THE

WESTERLY LINE OF DIRECTOR'S DEED
DOC NO. 202162264, O.R. AND THE
EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT 3835
PER 95 M 88-92
I '
F
[
1 L1
O 75 150
tu=I _t
SCALE 1"= 150'
I
POC
FD 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WITH

NO STAMP IN A WELL
N so8%2717w
> 102.63'
I
l
/
/
/
Cc1

CITY OF UNION CITY

DIRECTOR'S DEED
APN: 87-11-15-14,
15-15, 17-6&2 17-7
Doc No. 2021262264, 0.R.
~~E

EXISTING STREET ESMT
(DOC 85-209422, 0.R.)

TO BE ABANDONED
R=480.00'
A=15°3410°
L=130.43'
S37º51'49"W 23.80'
Scale: 1"=150'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 2 OF 4
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROWPRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\ROW\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_ROW_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR LEGEND

POB POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
M MAPS
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o DIMENSION POINT
(Z] PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
S76º78'27"W

84.94'
S49º53'02"E
~1111'HH46+(JLe.ij,.U 57.39' ..._
I CA-C?CG ]
DETAIL "B"
OW N33%2453"ER

CURVE TABLE
R=404.00'
C2 4=1531'43°
L=109.49'
R=496.00'
c3 4=09°11'03"°
L=79.51'
R=1276.00'
C4 A=08°04'35°
L=179.86'
R=6.00'
Cc5 4=88%40'24°
L=9.29'
R=3775.00'
C6 A=01%2446°
L=93.08'
R=10.00'
c7 A=89°05'50°
L= 15.55'
Scale: 1"=150'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH

LINE TABLE
N69°16'44"W
149.16' :
7 i)
'
> I
SEE DETAIL "A" :

BELOW I
I
L7 N77º08'30"W 6.03'
@

SOUTHERLY LINE OF

I / EXISTING ROAD EASEMENT
ALVARADO NILES ROAD T BK 8880, PG 35 O.R.

Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
R=218.00'
/H A=13°28'05"
L=51.24'
R=182.00'
4=13%28'05"
L=42.78' H.
:&g
aos
pg
~ ---r~ ;;; ~
g3n 5$á
ó&
o.
- --Rgéa_
r.co ó
g
co

CITY OF UNION CITY

DIRECTOR'S DEED
APN: 87-11-15-14, 15-15,
17-6& 17-7
Doc No. 2021262264, 0.R.

MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 4
O 75 150 300
[HI_E ±re
SCALE 1" = 150'
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
N5635'07W

51.52'
\
C4 I
-L1------'
N18º43'23"E (R) :

DETAIL "B"
1 I
_ _¡_ N.T.S. _,I
-
749.

N79º49'06"E

13.23'
N02"52'07"E

24.99'
R=40.00
A= 7 5º46'06"
L= 17.01' -
• N
o
ni
rs is%
------
_____<L_
DETAIL "A"
SHEET 3 OF 4
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROWPRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\ROW\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_ROW_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
R=12.00' A=90O0'O0" L=18.85 {
I
I
I
I
-S71º21'47"E 254.58'- -------l __
N71°21'47W 235.93'
"0'' ' ' ' ' ' ('zi !:Q_~I j
, séorA'e

I ABOVE

LINE TABLE
\ \
\ xusTNG STREET ESMT
\-' Doc85-209422, 0.R)
-R=74,, TO BEABANDONED
6oo. \.
/=4.
103,9»
{=},
Q,
·8
> ~
;::--...
;::--...
:::---
~
-1552o57
"3855
32 '<OO>
93 LEGEND L2 S76º05'23"W 70.27'

POB POINT OF BEGINNING
L3 N7358'54"W41.36'

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
M MAPS L4 N70º34'35"E 57.05'
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o DIMENSION POINT
(] PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
R=92.00' A=17%42'17" L=28.43' »
_R=108.00' A=019"2435° L=36.59'
R=639.00' A=7°12'59" L=80.48'
,N626'27E(R
I
@
•
I
I
I
I
I
N71°21'47W18.65' I
' I
R=12.00' A=9000'00" L= 18.85°
I I
$18°38'13W28.07 oETAL"c l
I I N.TS. , -----~-----------------~
N71º21'47"W 235.93'
S78º38'13"W 16.00'
O 75 150 300
t KI E 1
SCALE 1"= 150'
]
E,
12 z ó
g1%
SIB: L Lu,-
0 O
>- >
H [
- e ) O -
ü
y
ot
~
n
"'
Scale: 1"=150'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 4 OF 4
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROW\PRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\ROW\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_ROW_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Public Right-of-Way Dedication dated ho«4 _, 202from the City of Union City ("City"), is hereby accepted on behalf of the City by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the City Council of the City of Union City adopted on Jái,,wJ#x 2/:3, 202 fo and that City Council consents to recordation of the Grant Deed by its duly aut orized officer.
atea he«ry ,202

CITY OF UNION CITY
By:

CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

2.ces}
a, Ur4y_ 23,2Ole.Ed- Como, l
Here Insert Name and Title of
personally appearedQC(OuO NA)oy
_) Names) of signers)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. ........ l

ERIKA CRAMER
Notary Public - California z
Alameda County z
Commission # 2465402
y Comm. Expires Oct 3, 2027
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the
laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
-..7°A
Signature of Notary Public

OPTIONAL
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document _,py _p
re o Tree or ocum-anteChi# of NcpvC,
Document Date:--~\➔\-m~'I--~~~------------- Number of Pages: _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Si9ner's Name: ~OM ~~ Signer's Name:
scorporate orfcer - Tiles. CORE @ü«CT corporate oicer - Tilesr:
] Partner - D Limited DJ General D Partner - DJ Limited DJ General □ Individual
□ Trustee
□ Other:
□ Attorney in Fact
□ Guardian or Conservator
□ Individual
□ Trustee
□ Other:
□ Attorney in Fact
□ Guardian or Conservator
Signer is Representing: c\-u tt \,WcY) C.!!J Signer is Representing: ---------- ©2019 National Notary Association

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Union City
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587
Attn: City Clerk
Exempt from recording fees per Government Code
$$6103, 27383
CONFORMED COPY - has not been compared with Original.
2026010913 01/29/2026 10:02 AM 14 PGS

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY

MELISSA WILK, CLERK-RECORDER
RECORDING FEES: $0.00
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE)
APN: 87-11-17-6, 87-11-15-14, 87-11-17-7, 87-11-15-15, 87-11-16-3 The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s) ◄
Documentary transfer tax is $0 SECTION 11922 R & T CODE: GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY ACQUlRlNG TITLE
City Transfer Tax: $0.00
[ ] computed on full value of property conveyed, or
[ ] computed on full value less value ofliens or encumbrances remaining at time ofsale,

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT DEDICATION The City ofUnion City ("City") does hereby dedicate a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for public utility and public landscape purposes, and incidents and appurtenances thereto, over, under, along and across all that real property situated in the City ofUnion City, County of Alameda, State ofCalifornia as described and depicted in Exhibit A-Legal Description and Exhibit B-Plat to Accompany Legal Description, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

CITY OF UNION CIT,OMEg.,
a California municipal corporation
et.e%
EXHIBIT "A"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that property situate in the City of Union City, County of Alameda, State of California, being a portion ofthose lands described in that Director's Deed recorded on July 29, 2021, as Document Number 2021262264 and that Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions recorded November 9, 1972, in Reel 3273, Image 718 as Document Number 72-152997, Official Records of said County, more particularly described as follows:

PARCEL 1- Public Utility Easement
COMMENCING at a found 2 ½ inch brass disk with no stamp in a well shown as found standard city monument on Alvarado-Niles Road near the intersection of Osprey Drive on Tract 3835 recorded on June 29, 1977 in Book 95 of Maps at Pages 88 to 92 in the Office ofthe Recorder of said County which bears North 15º05'13" East, 638.77 feet from a found 2 ½ inch brass disk with no stamp in a well set to mark the northerly terminus ofthat line shown as "N33°31'20"E 189.06' M-M" on said Tract 3835;
thence South 13°05'14" East, 104.89 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right, having a radius of25.00 feet, with a radial bearing ofNorth 73º42'20" West, also being the POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 94°25'3 7", an arc distance of 41.20 feet;
thence South 69º 16'44" East, 149 .16 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence South 20°43'16" West, 6.00 feet to a line parallel with and lying 6.00 feet southerly thereof; thence along said line, North 69º16'44" West, 149.16 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 19.00 feet;
thence southwesterly along said curve, being concentric with last said curve, through a central angle of94º25'37", an arc distance of31.31 feet;
thence North 73º42'20" West, 6.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 1,112 square feet or 0.03 acres, more or less.

PARCEL 2 - Landscape and Public Utility Easement
BEGINNING at said Point "A" , also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 10.00 feet, with a radial bearing of North 20º43'16" East; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 89°05'50", an arc distance of

15.55 feet;
thence South 19°49'06" West, 13.23 feet;
thence South 02°52'07" West, 24.99 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 40.00 feet;
thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 15º46'06", an arc distance of

11.01 feet;
thence South 18º38'13" West, 764.17 feet;
thence North 71 °21 '47" West, 10.00 feet;
thence North 18º38'13" East, 764.17 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 30 feet;
thence northerly along said curve through a central angle of 15°46'06", an arc distance of 8.26 feet; thence North 02°52'07" East, 26.48 feet;
thence, North 20°00'41" East, 18.72 feet;
thence North 20°43'16" East, 6.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 8,212 square feet or 0.19 acres, more or less. 2 PARCEL 3 - Landscape and Public Utility Easement
COMMENCING at a found 2 ½ inch brass disk with no stamp in a well set to mark the northerly terminus ofthat line shown as "N33312OE 189.06' M-M" on Tract 3835 recorded on June 29, 1977 in Book 95 of Maps at Pages 88 to 92 in the Office of the Recorder of said County which bears South 15°05'13" West, 638.77 feet from a found 2 ½ inch brass disk with no stamp in a well shown as found standard city monument on Alvarado-Niles Road near the intersection of Osprey Drive on said Tract 3835;
thence South 31 º00'43" East, 446.41 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 18º38'13" East, 583.36 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 182.00 feet;
thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 13º28'05", an arc distance of42.78 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 218.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 13 °28'05", an arc distance of 51.24 feet;
thence North 18°38'13" East, 83.62 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 3775.00 feet;
thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of0l º24'46", an arc distance of93.08 feet to the beginning of a compound curve to the right, having a radius of 6.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 88°40'24", an arc distance of9.29 feet;
thence South 71 °08'30" East, 6.03 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1276.00 feet, with a radial bearing of North 18°59'37" East; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 08°04'35", an arc distance of 179.86 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 496.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 09º 11 '03 ", an arc distance of 79 .51 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 404.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 15º31 '43", an arc distance of 1 09 .49 feet;
thence South 56°35'07" East, 51.52 feet;
thence South 49°53'02" East, 60.67 feet;
thence South 11 º03'04" West, 3.16 feet;
3 thence North 5635'07" West, 112.98 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 394.00 feet;
thence northwesterly along said curve, being concentric with last said curve, through a central angle of 15º31'43", an arc distance of 106.78 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 506.00 feet;
thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 09°11 '03", an arc distance of

81.11 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 1266.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 08º10'13", an arc distance of 180.53 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 3765.00 feet, with a radial bearing ofNorth 70º00'36" West;
thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of01º21'12", an arc distance of

88.92 feet;
thence South 18º38'13" West, 83.62 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 228.00 feet;
thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 13°28'05", an arc distance of

53.59 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 172.00 feet; thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 13º28'05", an arc distance of

40.43 feet;
thence South 18º38'13" West, 583.37 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 2.00 feet;
thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 90º00'00", an arc distance of 3 .14 feet;
thence South 71 °21'47" East, 254.5 8 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1436.00 feet;
thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 43 º 15' 16", an arc distance of 1084.08 feet to a point on the boundary ofCity ofUnion City; thence along said City boundary South 16º05'23" West, 14.40 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1426.00 feet, with a radial bearing of North 62º18'22" East;
thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 43º40'09", an arc distance of 1086.86 feet;
4 thence North 71 º21 '47" West, 254.58 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 12.00 feet;
thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 90°00'00", an arc distance of

18.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 26,705 square feet or .61 acres, more or less.

Shown graphically on Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof.

This real property description has been prepared at Mark Thomas & Company Inc., by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act.

Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

ANNETTE M. HOVORKA PLS. 8246
1/21/2026
DATE
5 LEGEND
FD 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WITH
NO STAMP IN A WELL (FD STD SEE PARCEL 1 PUE DETAILS SHEET 2 OF 6 CITY MON PER 95 M 88-92) 1 ] I' l>

ALVARADO NILES POD '--- ------
------
------

POB POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o DIMENSION POINT
(ZA PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
------
G
E: 1 _D-
- l N
co
íY)
O
I.U ·1
.%
>1a
z
D 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WIT

NO STAMP IN A WE
\JORTHERLY TERMINUS
-M LINE PER 95 M 88-9
I
l
\
'--6
71 TT
@
------
Ire==I I--
li;]
4/%¡ {
!±¡
l12 '
J
~ I I I CITY OF UNION CITY
i
;
,

I DIRECTOR'S DEED
] APN: 87-11-15-14, 15-15, 17-6& 17-7
E'T DocNo. 2021262264 ?
I]la: < o'te
ijigi if ¿é
ili<
+
it
I }
j 5
5 ,@r
I I 5: I I I\ \\ mo~
}E
li35j
]
'
y [
IA\;#
o o
]
1,,,,-0UARRYLAKESDRIVE ----- 7
T=; '[
-----rl ------,
li •SEE PARCEL 2 LANDSCAPE & ] L]
, oe EtAs sHtT3or6, 1 []
Eu]

I LANDSCAPE AND PUE -L
( SHEET6OF6
'--
'
------
------
----------
------
"
O 150 300 600
I Fl I _ I Feet
SCALE 1" = 300'
BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID BASED ON CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (1991.35), ZONE Ill. ALL DISTANCES ARE SHOWN IN US SURVEY FOOT. DIVIDE GRID DISTANCES BY 1.0000652 TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES.

NOTE 1: INSTRUMENT CONVEYING STREET AREAS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE EXPECTED TO BE FILED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THIS INSTRUMENT.

Scale: 1"= 300'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 7 OF 6
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROW\PRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\PUE\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_PUE_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR LEGEND

POB POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o DIMENSION POINT
[] PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
-
@
POC
FD 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WITH

NO STAMP IN A WELL
t
~
o,
\3I
\ \ ~ .I I
5 5
l, '
\ \\
\

AL VARADO NILES ROAD
N73º42'20"W(R)
R=25.00' A=94%25'37" L=41.20' POINT "A"
PARCEL 1- PUE
a±Tr # ±NI,t
0014jp
e
/ 4 +
± 3??
n aO
o
o
¥
N73º42'20"W (R) 6.00'
R=19.00' A=94%25'37 L=31.31

CITY OF UNION CITY

DIRECTOR'S DEED
APN: 87-11-15-14,
15-15, 17-6& 17-7
Doc No. 2021262264, O.R.
o
t
20 E=I
40 t
80 l ras
SCALE 1" = 40'
~VFD 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WITH

NO STAMP IN A WELL
Scale: 1"=40'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
tá
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 2 OF 6
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROWPRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\PUE\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_PUE_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR LEGEND

POB POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o DIMENSION POINT
(] PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
N20%43'16"E 6.00'
N20º00'41"E 78.72'
N02º52'07"E 26.48'
R=30.00' A=15%46'06" L=8.26'
±019k
±622s4
>-
~
k
r
< r
a. I
uE- ün;z
<LuJ
I Luu
>- D
r. -
r
5 O
10'
@

ALVARADO NILES ROAD
POB
POINT "A"
N20º43' 16"E(R
C4
R=10.00' A=8905'50" L= 15.55
$19%49'06"W 13.23'
$0252'O7'W24.99'
$870753'ER)
R=40.00' A=15%46'06" L=11.01'

CITY OF UNION CITY

DIRECTOR'S DEED
APN: 87-11-15-14, 15-15,
17-682 17-7
Doc No. 2021262264, 0.R.

PARCEL2

LANDSCAPE & PUE
N71°2147W

10.00'
O 30 60 120
I Fl j j Feet
SCALE 1" = 60'
Scale: 1"=60'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 3 OF 6
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROW\PRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\PUE\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_PUE_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR FD 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WITH

NO STAMP IN A WELL
LEGEND
MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 5
,
I ----1
>- o
t'Y) o
t'Y)
~
n-i n-i co co ¥ L Ln >
[ G
r
t'Y)
u a t
t'Y)
....

E- co t,
~\
o t'Y) co
z o
t'Y) co o
< Luu t
co I uJ z p,
>- D V")
r
r
5 O ±6tk
+267054
POB
-::---_
9370043Ea4a.a)
10'
...

CITY OF UNION CITY

DIRECTOR'S DEED
APN: 87-11-15-14, 15-15,
17-6& 17-7
Doc No. 2021262264, O.R.

R=2.00' A=9000'00" L=3.14
op
S77º21'47"E 254.58'

EXISTING STREET ESMT
(DOC 85-209422, 0.R.)

TO BE ABANDONED

POB POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
I
I
[ -- -_ l_
_ Ii A
- 1
¡.-

I '--- '---
1 '--- '---
I
I
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
R=1436.00°
4 L=
=
1 4
0 3
8 °
4 15
.0
'1
8 6
°
°=
11111 PARCEL3

LANDSCAPE & PUE
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o
o

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED

DIMENSION POINT

PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
<i ?/ Nzrr47w2s4s8____t R=1426o
R=12.00' A=43°4099
A=9
L
0 =
0 1
0 8
'
.
0 8
0 5
"
°
-: QUARRY LAKES DRIVE (SEE NOTE 1) L=1086.gs
/
POC I
FD 2 1/2" BRASS DISK WITH

NO STAMP IN A WELL
o
l
LLI
LI
r
O
LLI
LLI
O
I
LLI
z
::J
)
r @
}
<1
>
O 60 120 240
LEI t 1es
SCALE 1" = 120'
Scale: 1"=120'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 4 OF 6
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROW\PRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\PUE\QUARRY_AKES_PKY_PUE_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR LEGEND

POS POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL
o FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o DIMENSION POINT
(] PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
Í
----S7-10-8'30"-E -6.03-' 7
I [Nass3rER [
'ca
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
DETAIL "A"
N.T.S.

CJO
N78º54'00"E(R)
R=1266.00'
N70º00'36"W(R) I _\ene -I
@
O 60 120 240
I Fl I J Feet
SCALE 1" = 120'

CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE R=182.00' R=3775.00' R=1276.00' R=404.00' R=506.00'
Cl A=13%28'05° C3 A=012446" C5 A=08"0435 C7 A=15°3143" C9 A=0911'03° L=42.78' L=93.08' L=179.86' L=109.49' L=81.11'
R=218.00' R=6.00' R=496.00' R=394.00' R=1266.00'
C2 A=13%28'05° C4 A=88%40'24" C6 A=09°11'03° C8 A=15°3143" C10 A=08°10'13" L=51.24 L=9.29' L=79.51' L=106.78' L= 180.53'

CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE
R=3765.00'
C11 A=1%2111"°
L=88.92'

ALVARADO NILES ROAD
SEE DETAIL "A"
1 N18°38'13"E

83.62'
DO
LI +-
>- u] <g
'so
>- z
ggL
EJ
5 @
O
el/
o
R=228.00' R=172.00'
C12 A=1328'05° C13 A=1328'05°
L=53.59' L=40.43'
_CS
C9
N18°54'00"E(R) R= 1266.00'
70'
yS18%38'13"W 83.62'
C1o
9 PARCEL3

LANDSCAPE & PUE
±061
+26705s4

CITY OF UNION CITY

DIRECTOR'S DEED
APN: 87-11-15-14, 15-15,
17-68 17-7
Doc No. 2021262264, 0.R.
9º53'02"E 60.67'
-
6t/
o
MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 4
Scale: 1"=120'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 5 OF 6
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROW\PRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\PUE\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_PUE_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR LEGEND
\
\
\
\
\ EXISTING STREET ESMT
<'\ (DOC 85-209422, O.R.)
\ TO BE ABANDONED
\
\ \\
! \
e
\ \
~\"
>,,_8,
-S '<2@a
R. \
7y <Iy
?2 Y2
06 7S,
A '6o
\ I, I
~
-Y._jlo <-:::::7. o, 'O9
o> <,
(<;;
9$
€.¢
''6
PARCEL3 'S

LANDSCAPE & PUE
\

CITY OF UNION CITY

DIRECTOR'S DEED
APN: 87-11-15-14, 15-15,
17-68 17-7
Doc No. 2021262264, 0.R.
t
1-
LLI
LL!
r
u
LI
LLI
O
I
LI
z
:::::¡
r
)
I-
<£
5 S61º53'29"W(R
- -
-------
• ..
~
Y
° "
'
8 N62º18'22"E(R
''~
.
-..
¡------
>-
=I,
$
o 5
LL] z cc D ü
I.J... I.J...
o o
>H n-}
o,
l------
$1605'23"W

14.40'

POB POINT OF BEGINNING

POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS
(R) RADIAL

O FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o DIMENSION POINT
(Z] PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED
@
O 60 120 240
L.ul t 3ros
SCALE 1" = 120'
Scale: 1"=120'
Date: JAN, 2026
Drawn By AK
Checked By AH
Exhibit B
Plat to Accompany Legal Description
In the City of Union City
Alameda County, California
Ad
■■

MARK THOMAS
SHEET 6 OF 6
J\UNION CITY-22-00100-QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PH 1 AND 2\SURVEY AND ROW\PRODUCTION FILES\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & PLATS\PUE\QUARRY_LAKES_PKY_PUE_PLAT.DWG 2026-01-08 AKUMAR

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Public Utility Easement and Landscape Easement Dedication dated._dapuay 2b8_,202@from the City of Union City ("City"), is hereby accepted on behalf of the City by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the City Council of the City of Union City adopted on la«arj 2, 202and that City Council consents to recordation of the Grant Deed by its duly authorized officer. atea. Canoa)2,aee2D3{>

CITY OF UNION CITY
By:~
slle. ese.

CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California }
couv orNah€do
fa0u99aley28,29l0.«ik- Cr8NG.0 \NA.

Here msert Name au iGrin omcer
personally appeared (Qoya M]Cy CJ Names) or signers)
On
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person{s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. a.tit.t.ti.ti......i
] a, @us {
: :: ..... Notary Public • ~liforni• 2 ¿(f -9¿:] Aames@ Cuny 3 Commission # 2465402 i
My Comm. Expires Oct 3, 2027
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the
laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
s;gnature @A
Sig
)
nat
~
ure of Notary Public

OPTIONAL
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document . , p
Tile or Type or Document: _crryiat ct NCpl
Document pate:. _ÜovUQyq23,90Qo NumberotPages:1
Signer(s) Other Than Named [Bory
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer s)
>lqner's [ame. ''l.»,blaner's [ame.
i'w'Corporate Officer . □ Corporate Officer Title(s).
□ Partner - □ Limited □ Ge □ Partner - □ Limited □ General □ Individual □ Attorney in Fact □ Individual □ Attorney in Fact □ Trustee □ Guardian or Conservator □ Trustee □ Guardian or Conservator □ Other: □ Other:

Signer is Representing: C\·(J of- IM1Qf) C!J Signer is Representing: _ 088858808588888888888.88888888 08888883888883838881838388888888088~ ©2019 National Notary Association
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E082408A46 ¢ }

METROPOLITAN

TRANSPORTATION

COMMISSION
Bay Area Metro Center
375 Beale Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
+15.778.6700
www.mtc.ca.gov
Sue Noack, Chair
Cis of Contra Costa County
Stephanie Moulton-Peters,
lice Chair
MLarin Cun and Cties
Marilou Ayupan
City of Union City
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587
MargaretAbe-Koga
Santa Clara Count
Eddie Ah
San Franersco Bay Conservation
and Development Commtssion
Candace Andersen
Contra Costa County
Marilyn Ezzy .Ashcraft
Cinures of Almeda County
Pat Burt
Cities of Santa Clara County
David Canepa
San Mateo County
Vitoria Fleming
Som County and Cities
Dorene M. Giacopini
LS Deparuem of'Transportation
Alicia Toh-Baptiste
an Francisco Mayor Appointee
Barbara Lee
Oland Mayor Appotee
Matt Mahan
5an Jose Mayor's \ppotee
Amber Manfree
Napa Count and Cites
Mitch Mashburn
Solano County and Cities
Myrna Melgar
City and County of Sun Francisco
Vate Miley
Alameda Count
RE: Allocation of Regional Measure 3 (RM3) Funds in FY 2025-26 Dear Ms. Ayupan:

On December 17, 2025, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) MTC Resolution No.4660 of December 17, 2025, which allocated Regional Measure 3 (RM3) Revenue Funds to City of Union City. Funds totaling $3,728,000 were allocated to cover expenses incurred for activities specified in the Allocation Instruction(s). Eligible capital costs must be incurred before June 30, 2028. Funds not drawn by August 30, 2028, revert to the fund.

RM3 Capital Program is operated on a reimbursement basis. RM3 expenses must be incurred following the allocation approval date. Any expenses prior to approval date will not be eligible for reimbursement. Per MTC's RM 3 Policies and Procedures, expenses against an allocation should be incurred beginning no later than within 6 months of allocation. Additionally, approval ofinvoices shall be contingent upon compliance with MTC's semi-annual progress report submittal requirements. Invoices covering expenditures in the final month ofthe allocation expenditure deadline (June I through June 30) must be submitted to MTC within 60 days ofthe end ofthe fiscal year (no later than August 30). Invoices and supporting documentation are to be addressed in a combined PDF to the following:

Metropolitan Transportation Commission
375 Beale Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Attn: Accounts Payable-RM3
(or emai I at: [email protected])
Gina Papan
Cities of Sm Mateo County
Belia Ramos
lssiatio of Bn Area
Libby Schaaf
.S, Department of Housing
ind Urban Development
Vacant
California State
Transportation Agency
Andree B. Fremier
Executive Director
Alis Bockelman
Chief Depuy Fecurive Director
Enclosed is a copy of MTC Resolution No. 4660 of December 17, 2025, describing the project(s), terms and conditions for the allocation(s). Please note that the terms and conditions attached have a systemic error listing July 31 as the date of a given year for funds to revert to the fund. Reimbursements will be made in accordance with the reimbursement schedule approved in Attachment D ofthe Allocation Resolution. MTC will conduct an annual audit of these costs through an independent audit firm.

Docusign Envelope ID: 0984D0DA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E082408A6 Ifyou have any questions, please contact Craig Bosman at (415) 778-6770 or email [email protected] for programming questions, or Alita Reinecker at (415) 778- 6753 or email [email protected] for financial questions.

Sincerely,
r-::OocuSigned by:
z±er
Tarek Radwan
Assistant Director, Operational Accounting
cc: TOA Mailbox, MTC
Attachment
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E08240846 To: Auditor
County:MTC
Date: 12/17/2025
Metropolitan Transportation Commission

ALLOCATION INSTRUCTION
Fund RM 3
Fiscal Year Ending 2025-26
Claimant:

UNION CITY, CITY OF
34009 ALVARADO-NILES ROAD
UNION CITY, CA 94587
Total Allocation: $ 2,578,000.00
REGIONAL MEASURE REVENUE 3- CAPITAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJ. 17.5:

UNION CITY QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY
RM 3- CITY OF UNION CITY
DISBURSEMENT AUTHORIZATION:

REIMBURSEMENT BASIS;

THE AGENCY SHOULD SUBMIT INVOICES

FOR EXPENDITURES INCURRED ONCE PER

QUARTER, BUT NO MORE FREQUENTLY

THAN ONCE PER MONTH UNLESS

SPECIFIED IN ATTACHMENT B
OF AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION.

Allocation Instruction # 26466005
2,578,000.00
Terms and Conditions: Funds are reserved for a period of years set by allocation year(s). Eligible costs must be incurred on or before June 30, 2028 . Funds not drawn by July 31, 2028 ,revert to the fund.

MTC will issue disbursement authorization upon receipt of documentation substantiating actual expenditure. Funds expended pursuant to this allocation instruction must be included in UNION CITY, CITY OF annual certified fiscal audit as required by the RM3 Policies and Procedures.

Authorizing Signature
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E08240846 To: Auditor
County: MTC
Date: 12/17/2025
Metropolitan Transportation Commission

ALLOCATION INSTRUCTION
Fund RM 3
Fiscal Year Ending 2025-26
Claimant:

UNION CITY, CITY OF
34009 ALVARADO-NILES ROAD
UNION CITY, CA 94587
Total Allocation: $ 1,000,000.00
REGIONAL MEASURE REVENUE 3- CAPITAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJ. 17.5:

UNION CITY QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY
RM 3- CITY OF UNION CITY
DISBURSEMENT AUTHORIZATION:

REIMBURSEMENT BASIS;

THE AGENCY SHOULD SUBMIT INVOICES

FOR EXPENDITURES INCURRED ONCE PER

QUARTER, BUT NO MORE FREQUENTLY

THAN ONCE PER MONTH UNLESS

SPECIFIED IN ATTACHMENT B
OF AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION.

Allocation Instruction # 26466006
1,000,000.00
Terms and Conditions: Funds are reserved for a period of years set by allocation year(s). Eligible costs must be incurred on or before June 30, 2028. Funds not drawn by July 31, 2028 , revert to the fund.

MTC will issue disbursement authorization upon receipt of documentation substantiating actual expenditure. Funds expended pursuant to this allocation instruction must be included in UNION CITY, CITY OF annual certified fiscal audit as required by the RM3 Policies and Procedures.

Authorizing Signature
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E082408A46 To: Auditor
County: MTG
Date: 12/17/2025
Metropolitan Transportation Commission

ALLOCATION INSTRUCTION
Fund RM 3
Fiscal Year Ending 2025-26
Claimant:

UNION CITY, CITY OF
34009 ALVARADO-NILES ROAD
UNION CITY, CA 94587
Allocation Instruction # 26466007
Total Allocation: $ 150,000.00
REGIONAL MEASURE REVENUE 3- CAPITAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJ. 17.5:

UNION CITY QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY
RM 3- CITY OF UNION CITY
DISBURSEMENT AUTHORIZATION:

REIMBURSEMENT BASIS;

THE AGENCY SHOULD SUBMIT INVOICES

FOR EXPENDITURES INCURRED ONCE PER

QUARTER, BUT NO MORE FREQUENTLY

THAN ONCE PER MONTH UNLESS

SPECIFIED IN ATTACHMENT B
OF AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION.
150,000.00
Terms and Conditions: Funds are reserved for a period of years set by allocation year(s). Eligible costs must be incurred on or before June 30, 2028 . Funds not drawn by July 31, 2028 , revert to the fund.

MTC will issue disbursement authorization upon receipt of documentation substantiating actual expenditure. Funds expended pursuant to this allocation instruction must be included in UNION CITY, CITY OF annual certified fiscal audit as required by the RM3 Policies and Procedures.

Authorizing Signature

Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute the Fifth Amendment to
Consulting Services Agreement with Mark
Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of
$2,578,000, for a Total Contract Amount of
$10,567,191, for the Final Design of Phase
(Segment) 1 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway
Project, City Project No. 18-04
Marilou R. Ayupan, Public Works Director
City Manager Report- Item 5.1
March 10, 2026 - City Council Meeting
2 Quarry Lakes Parkway Update
3 3
QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY, PHASES 1-4
Old Alameda
Creek
Alameda Creek
Flood Control
Channel
Line M
Line M
4 PHASE 2: GATEWAY CONNECTION UPDATE(Old Alameda Creek to Alvarado-Niles Road)  Construct new QLP, realign QLD
with bike lanes/trail and modify ANR
 Construct water quality treatment
basin and outfall structures in Old Alameda Creek for the Line M Overflow pipeline  Install and modify utilities Install new traffic signals, street lighting, landscape and trees
Construction Estimate - $33.0 million
Final Design Funds
$2,998,000 with Alameda
CTC Grant Funds
5 Line M
 Overflow Pipeline - additional flow from Line M Construct 3-foot weir at the downstream end of OAC Retain water for riparian habitat & biological resource improvements Environmental and Design Accomplishments
6 Environmental Off-Site Mitigation (Construction & Permits) Line M
 Sites Approved by RWQCB Meets Mitigation requirements for Wetland, Riparian, Species and Waters and other Alameda CTC projects  Developers also want these sites
Approved Location (Livermore)
1) Manning Ranch (part of Eagle Ridge)2) Cayetano CreekOffsite Mitigation Funds$13,000 with MTC RM3 Grant 7 PHASE 1: 7TH STREET CONNECTION
(7TH Street to Mission Boulevard)
 Realign 7th Street along Corporation
Yard to connect to Chesapeake with new Traffic Signal
 Realign the Line M Flood Control
Channel & construct Line M overflow
 Reconstruct Corp Yard Security WallImpacts UC Transit & DBX Fleet  Modify QLP/Mission Blvd Intersection  New parking lot for Corporation Yard & Dog Park
Construction Estimate - $36.0 million
Final Design Funds
$2,578,000
(MTC RM3 DB Grant Funds)
8 Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1
Final Design Requirements
 Finalize the roadway alignment for Quarry Lakes Parkway, the realigned 7th Street in fronting the Corporation Yard and Mission Boulevard (SR 238), which will require a Caltrans Encroachment Permit.
 Define the public right-of-way, the landscape easement and public utility easements (PUE), and coordinate with existing property owners, Alameda County Public Works, PG&E, and Caltrans. Prepare the Right-of-Way Mapping  Coordinate with Alameda County Public Works on the final alignment of the relocated Line M Flood Control Channel. Need County approvals of the new rights-of-way and the revised maintenance agreement. 9 Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1
Final Design Requirements
 Evaluate the right-of-way impacts to the Corporation Yard site and determine if design refinements are needed.
 Evaluate the circulation in and out of the Corporation Yard for public works operations and UC Transit and Dumbarton Express operations and parking and determine if design refinements are needed.  Update the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee on the proposed Phase 1 bike and pedestrian improvements.
 Update the Parks and Recreation Commission on the impacts to the Drigon Dog Park during construction.
10 Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1Existing Right-of-Way and Properties 11 Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1Proposed Right-of-Way (Road and Line M Channel) 12 Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1Permanent Impacts to Transit Operations and Parking 13 Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1
14 Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phases 1-4
Upcoming City Council Actions
 Approve Consulting Services Agreement with selected CM firm for Constructability Review of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2 (95% PS&E), in the amount of $260,000 (Alameda CTC Grant funds)  Accept the First Addendum of the Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector) CEQA EIR and authorize the City Manager to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the mitigation values with Rocky Ridge, LLC, for Offsite Mitigation Construction, in the estimated amount of $11.4 million (MTC RM3 DB Grant Funds) 15 Quarry Lakes Parkway-Decoto Complete Streets Funds
Dedicated Transportation Funds Regional
Sources
Amount
AlaCTC 1986 Measure B Funds* County $65,500,000AlaCTC 2005 CMA-TIP County $14,300,000Caltrans Route 84 LATIP Funds State $41,814,000 AlaCTC 2014 Measure BB (TEP 21-Dumbarton)
County $40,000,000
AlaCTC 2014 Measure BB (TEP 22- Intermodal Station)
County $75,000,000
MTC RM3, Dumbarton Corridor Funds
Bay Area $25,000,000
Total Funds $261,614,000
16 Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phases 1-3 Timeline Schedule
16 17
Final Design of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1
Staff RecommendationAdopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Service Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the amount of $2,578,000, for a Total Contract Amount of $10,567,191, for the Final Design of Phase (Segment) 1 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04 Questions?
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 5 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 5.2
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Receive the Second Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council receive the Second Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2025–2026.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This item aligns with Goal A: Financial Stability and Sustainability.

BACKGROUND
Quarterly Financial Reports provide early visibility into financial trends that may not otherwise be apparent until year-end. These reports help cities:
• Track budget performance in real time, including both revenues and expenditures • Increase transparency by providing a public accounting of how funds are being used
• Inform strategic decisions regarding staffing, capital projects, and service levels based on updated financial conditions
This report is intended for internal analysis and does not include all funds and accounts in the City’s operations. The information presented has not been audited. Staff reviewed seven months of transactions (July through January) rather than the typical six-month period (July through December), as including January provides a more complete financial picture and improves year-end projections.

Attachment 1, Revenue Details (Annual), demonstrates the irregular timing of revenue receipts, which can make projecting annual revenues challenging. Including January data improves the accuracy of the analysis.

DISCUSSION
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 5 March 10, 2026
General Fund Revenues
The chart below presents General Fund actual revenues for FY 2023 through FY 2025, along with an analysis of FY 2026. For FY 2026, the chart includes revenues received through January 31, 2026, the percentage of the budget collected, and staff’s projection for the fiscal year-end. Details of all General Fund revenues are also presented in the attachments.

As shown in the chart above, staff projects General Fund revenues for FY 2026 to be generally consistent with the adopted budget. Revenues from business license taxes and utility users’ taxes may exceed projections, while revenues from sales taxes, licenses and permits, and miscellaneous sources may fall short.

The charts below present stable or positive General Fund revenue categories. Through January 31, 2026 (58.3% of the fiscal year), the City has received 49.1% of projected property taxes, 64.7% of projected business license taxes, and 48.5% of projected UUT revenues.

Property taxes and utility users’ taxes are collected by outside entities and remitted to the City, resulting in a delay in receiving these funds. Business license taxes are collected at City Hall. Receiving 64.7% of the adopted business license tax revenues by 58.3% of the fiscal year indicates that this revenue category is currently exceeding the adopted budget projection.
110-GENERAL FUND Unaudited At 1/31/26 % of Year
Revenue by Category FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj 4A-Prop Tax-Sec & Unsec 15,914,320 17,080,802 17,671,499 18,745,700 8,691,109 46.4% 18,745,700 4B-Prop Tax-Supplementa 663,130 592,656 399,118 650,400 79,461 12.2% 650,400 4C-Prop Tax-VLF in Lieu 8,472,448 9,035,866 9,476,816 9,846,400 4,954,006 50.3% 9,846,400 4D-Prop Taxes-Other 3,310,915 3,442,021 3,785,157 3,597,700 2,407,023 66.9% 3,597,700 4E-Sales and Use Taxes 19,630,716 18,382,379 18,420,605 18,137,500 7,597,663 41.9% 18,137,500 4F-TransntOccupancy Tax 1,832,773 1,545,226 1,588,681 1,637,900 664,671 40.6% 1,637,900 4G-Franchises 5,825,882 6,389,901 6,448,735 6,839,564 3,034,275 44.4% 6,839,564 4H-Business Lic Taxes 1,897,354 2,359,898 3,283,776 4,800,000 3,104,910 64.7% 4,800,000 4L-Utility Users Taxes 6,295,863 6,596,476 7,033,443 7,246,800 3,512,657 48.5% 7,246,800 4M-Taxes-Other 1,011,629 691,176 938,929 993,000 303,436 30.6% 993,000 4O-Licenses & Permits 2,977,876 3,749,643 3,518,243 4,737,800 1,827,414 38.6% 4,737,800 4P-Fines & Forteitures 263,941 347,567 284,201 415,700 213,290 51.3% 415,700 4Q-Fees and Charges 2,638,319 2,571,553 3,555,390 3,158,250 1,455,817 46.1% 3,158,250 4R-Federal Revenues 14,007 179,134 30,255 - 6,041 0.0% - 4S-State Revenues 765,944 845,363 817,538 754,200 446,452 59.2% 754,200 4T-County & LocalGovRev 5,326 16,091 - - - 0.0% -
4U-Investment Income 412,729 4,428,959 2,612,158 2,656,800 135,779 5.1% 2,656,800 4V-MiscellaneousRevenue 351,811 236,550 666,052 1,053,100 142,572 13.5% 1,053,100 4X-OthrFinancingSources 511,078 690,861 - - - 0.0% -
4Y-Procd frSaleCapAsset 2,137 9,781 - 2,000 - 0.0% 2,000 4Z-Transfer In 7,049,913 818,000 943,000 18,000 - 0.0% 18,000 Total GF Revenues 79,848,113 80,009,902 81,473,596 85,290,814 38,576,576 45.2% 85,290,814 % Change from Prior Year 3.8% 0.2% 1.8% 4.7%
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 5 March 10, 2026
The voter approval of the Utility Users’ Tax in 2020 and the Business License Tax restructuring in 2024 account for approximately 14% of General Fund revenues in FY 2026. These locally controlled voter-approved revenues help ensure continuing budget stability. Property taxes constitute 39% of the General Fund, the 1% Bradley-Burns Sales Tax constitutes 14%, and the local one-half cent transactions and use tax (most recently renewed by voter-approved Measure AA in 2022) constitutes 7% of General Fund revenues. The chart below shows the percentage of UUT revenue by industry.

The charts below show the annual revenues for sales tax, licenses and permits, and fees and charges. The year-over-year decrease in transactions and use taxes is concerning, as the City relies on revenue growth to keep pace with rising expenses. Union City is not unique in facing downward pressure on sales taxes, as economic uncertainty may be slowing consumer spending.

General Fund Unaudited At 1/31/26 % of Year
Property Taxes FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj 4A-Prop Tax-Sec & Unsec 15,914,320 17,080,802 17,671,499 18,745,700 8,691,109 46.4% 18,745,700 4B-Prop Tax-Supplementa 663,130 592,656 399,118 650,400 79,461 12.2% 650,400 4C-Prop Tax-VLF in Lieu 8,472,448 9,035,866 9,476,816 9,846,400 4,954,006 50.3% 9,846,400 4D-Prop Taxes-Other 3,310,915 3,442,021 3,785,157 3,597,700 2,407,023 66.9% 3,597,700 Total Property Tax Revenues 28,360,813 30,151,345 31,332,589 32,840,200 16,131,599 49.1% 32,840,200 % Change from Prior Year 8.6% 6.3% 3.9% 4.8%
General Fund Unaudited At 1/31/26 % of Year
Business Lic Taxes FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj 4H-Business Lic Taxes 1,897,354 2,359,898 3,283,776 4,800,000 3,104,910 64.7% 4,800,000 % Change from Prior Year 6.1% 24.4% 39.1% 46.2%
General Fund Unaudited At 1/31/26 % of Year
Utility Users Taxes (UUT) FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj 4L-Utility Users Taxes 6,295,863 6,596,476 7,033,443 7,246,800 3,512,657 48.5% 7,246,800 % Change from Prior Year 19.1% 4.8% 6.6% 3.0%
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 4 of 5 March 10, 2026
Licenses, permits, fees, and charges are primarily revenue sources for services offered by the Economic & Community Development, Public Works, and Community & Recreation Services departments. Examples include plan check and inspection fees, as well as gym memberships. Licenses and permits revenue projection for FY 2026 includes anticipated building permit fees from the Station East development project. This project may not obtain the anticipated building permits by the end of FY 2026 as initially expected, and the associated permit revenues may shift into FY 2027.

General Fund Expenditures
July 2025 through January 2026 represents 58.3% of the fiscal year, and reported yearto-date expenditures are almost the same at 58.8%. Staff reviewed the detailed expenditures and projects General Fund expenditures will total approximately $85,089,400 by the end of FY 2026.

General Fund Unaudited At 1/31/26 % of Year
Sales and Use Taxes FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj 4E-Sales and Use Taxes 19,630,716 18,382,379 18,420,605 18,137,500 7,597,663 41.9% 18,137,500 % Change from Prior Year 2.5% -6.4% 0.2% -1.5%
General Fund Unaudited At 1/31/26 % of Year
Property Taxes FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj 4O-Licenses & Permits 2,977,876 3,749,643 3,518,243 4,737,800 1,827,414 38.6% 4,737,800 4Q-Fees and Charges 2,638,319 2,571,553 3,555,390 3,158,250 1,455,817 46.1% 3,158,250 Total Property Tax Revenues 5,616,195 6,321,196 7,073,633 7,896,050 3,283,231 41.6% 7,896,050 % Change from Prior Year 2.0% 12.6% 11.9% 11.6%
110-GENERAL FUND At 1/31/26 % of Year
Expenditure by Category FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj Note 5A-Salaries and Wages 29,809,316 18,458,874 61.9% 31,643,500 YE Proj based on YTD 5B-Employee Benefits 18,604,020 15,548,174 83.6% 17,725,200 YE Proj based on YTD 5C-Supplies 774,819 192,702 24.9% 371,900 YE Proj based on YTD 5D-Services 32,073,587 14,466,521 45.1% 30,617,000
5I-CapOutlay 1,712,579 244,912 14.3% 1,712,500 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 5G-Debt-LeaseObl 763,620 375,859 49.2% 763,500 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 5L-Transfer Out 2,255,815 1,315,895 58.3% 2,255,800 YE Proj = Adopted Budget Total Expenditures by Category 85,993,757 50,602,937 58.8% 85,089,400 110-GENERAL FUND At 1/31/26 % of Year
Expenditure by Department FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj Note 00-Non Dept-Citywide (515,000) 1,041,250 -202.2% 1,785,000 Transfers Out/Ant Sal Sav 11-City Council 885,618 426,726 48.2% 886,200
12-City Manager's Office 2,260,778 1,132,255 50.1% 2,012,000 13-City Attorney 659,205 236,151 35.8% 659,200
14-City Clerk 382,707 213,491 55.8% 338,000
15-Finance Department 3,443,924 2,191,361 63.6% 3,502,700 16-Human Resources Department 1,189,959 745,009 62.6% 1,233,300 17-Information Tech Services Dept 5,327,362 3,150,059 59.1% 5,191,000 21-Police Department 38,047,920 23,771,222 62.5% 36,456,800 22-Fire Department 14,679,142 7,270,807 49.5% 14,679,100 30-Public Works Department 5,818,805 3,437,376 59.1% 5,878,500 40-Economic & Community Dev Dept 5,623,185 2,966,856 52.8% 4,830,500 50-Community & Rec Services Dept 5,616,217 3,207,925 57.1% 5,061,700 60-Debt Service Programs 470,815 274,645 58.3% 470,800 POB Debt Service 80-Miscellaneous Programs 524,161 81,265 15.5% 525,700 Equipment Leases 90-Capital Projects (PW) 1,578,959 456,539 28.9% 1,578,900 Total Expenditures by Department 85,993,757 50,602,937 58.8% 85,089,400 Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 5 of 5 March 10, 2026

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive the Second Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2025–2026 and provide any questions or feedback.

Prepared by: Chu Thai, Finance Director
Submitted by: Chu Thai, Finance Director
Attachments

1. Revenue Details (FY26, by Month)

2. Revenue Details (Annual)

3. Expenditure by Object Code
REVENUE DETAILS (FY26, PER MONTH)
By Fund, Category
Program Obj Lookup FY26 Adopted Jul 2025 Aug 2025 Sep 2025 Oct 2025 Nov 2025 Dec 2025 Jan 2026 FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE PROJ 11000000 41110 Property Tax-Secured 17,770,900 - - - - - 8,691,109 - 8,691,109 48.9% 17,770,900 11000000 41111 Property Tax-Unsecured 974,800 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 974,800 4A-Prop Tax-Sec & Unsec Subtotal 18,745,700 - - - - - 8,691,109 - 8,691,109 46.4% 18,745,700 11000000 41112 Prop Tax-Supplemental 650,400 - - - - 30,102 49,359 - 79,461 12.2% 650,400 4B-Prop Tax-Supplementa Subtotal 650,400 - - - - 30,102 49,359 - 79,461 12.2% 650,400 11000000 41123 Prop Tax-Veh Lic Fee Swap 9,846,400 - - - - - 4,954,006 - 4,954,006 50.3% 9,846,400 4C-Prop Tax-VLF in Lieu Subtotal 9,846,400 - - - - - 4,954,006 - 4,954,006 50.3% 9,846,400 11000000 41113 Property Tax-Prior Year 225,700 - - - - 182,393 - - 182,393 80.8% 225,700 11000000 41114 Property Tax-Penalties 147,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 147,000 11000000 41115 Property Tax-Misc 300 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 300 11000000 41116 Homeowners Prop Tax Rel 101,500 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 101,500 11000000 41124 Special Assessment-Prior Year 500 - - - - 601 - - 601 120.2% 500 11000000 41127 Residual Distribution re RDA 3,122,700 - - - - - - 2,224,028 2,224,028 71.2% 3,122,700 4D-Prop Taxes-Other Subtotal 3,597,700 - - - - 182,994 - 2,224,028 2,407,023 66.9% 3,597,700 11000000 41201 Sales Tax 11,532,500 (1,900,224) 1,900,224 - 1,021,557 1,824,437 - 1,938,869 4,784,863 41.5% 11,532,500 11000000 41202 Meas AA Sales Tax 6,605,000 (1,180,898) 1,180,898 - 580,003 1,108,669 - 1,124,128 2,812,800 42.6% 6,605,000 4E-Sales and Use Taxes Subtotal 18,137,500 (3,081,122) 3,081,122 - 1,601,560 2,933,106 - 3,062,997 7,597,663 41.9% 18,137,500 11000000 41301 Transient Occupancy Tax-Hotel 1,494,500 362,712 - - 131,434 - - 96,965 591,111 39.6% 1,494,500 11000000 41302 Transient Occupancy Tax-Other 143,400 15,014 16,391 - 30,216 - - 11,939 73,560 51.3% 143,400 4F-TransntOccupancy Tax Subtotal 1,637,900 377,726 16,391 - 161,650 - - 108,904 664,671 40.6% 1,637,900 11000000 41401 Franchise Tax-Electric 933,500 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 933,500 11000000 41402 Franchise Tax-Gas 321,900 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 321,900 11000000 41403 Franchise Tax-Disposal 4,447,163 - 727,206 344,557 330,056 855,562 - 741,554 2,998,936 67.4% 4,447,163 11000000 41404 Franchise Tax-Cable TV 412,900 - 10,193 - - 10,146 - - 20,339 4.9% 412,900 11000000 41405 Franchise Fee - Towing 15,000 - - - - - - 15,000 15,000 100.0% 15,000 11000000 41406 Franchise Tax-Recycling 709,101 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 709,101 4G-Franchises Subtotal 6,839,564 - 737,399 344,557 330,056 865,709 - 756,554 3,034,275 44.4% 6,839,564 11000000 41501 Business License Tax 4,800,000 1,099,934 245,597 335,262 368,626 397,938 293,242 364,312 3,104,910 64.7% 4,800,000 4H-Business Lic Taxes Subtotal 4,800,000 1,099,934 245,597 335,262 368,626 397,938 293,242 364,312 3,104,910 64.7% 4,800,000 11000000 41901 Utility Users Tax - Electric 4,866,300 - 340,014 418,733 - - - 1,828,793 2,587,540 53.2% 4,866,300 11000000 41902 Utility Users Tax - Gas 1,266,200 - 20,181 78,406 - - - 345,948 444,535 35.1% 1,266,200 11000000 41903 Utility Users Tax - Telecom 585,500 - 137,305 50,889 - - - 112,692 300,886 51.4% 585,500 11000000 41904 Utility Users Tax - Video 528,800 - 65,155 30,497 - - - 84,044 179,696 34.0% 528,800 4L-Utility Users Taxes Subtotal 7,246,800 - 562,656 578,525 - - - 2,371,477 3,512,657 48.5% 7,246,800 11000000 41601 Real Prop Transfer Tax 396,900 (27,811) 82,501 - 49,706 13,979 55,565 18,252 192,193 48.4% 396,900 11000000 41802 Cannabis-Non-Cultivation 596,100 - 111,243 - - - - - 111,243 18.7% 596,100 4M-Taxes-Other Subtotal 993,000 (27,811) 193,744 - 49,706 13,979 55,565 18,252 303,436 30.6% 993,000 11000000 42101 Animal Licenses 10,000 767 963 900 548 321 591 526 4,615 46.2% 10,000 11000000 42104 PG&E Streetlight License 33,100 3,716 1,956 5,868 978 3,912 3,075 7,790 27,295 82.5% 33,100 11000000 42120 Small Cell Pole Master License - 130 520 - - - - - 650 - 11000000 42201 Parking Permits-Residential 5,000 - 118 118 118 (1,640) 118 2,333 1,165 13.9% 5,000 11021001 42201 Parking Permits-Residential 3,400 - - - - - - - - 3,400 11000000 42202 Burglar Alarm Registration Fee - 5,892 4,088 3,572 3,430 3,714 4,702 3,926 29,324 - 11000000 42203 Parking Permits-Station Dist 15,000 1,440 240 960 1,680 - 480 1,680 6,480 43.2% 15,000 11000000 42301 Fire-Annual Code Permit 275,000 2,825 6,604 11,522 9,400 8,356 2,656 6,908 48,271 17.6% 275,000 11000000 42302 Haz Mat Storage Permit 620,000 27,343 11,791 - 3,911 - 8,129 - 51,174 8.3% 620,000 11000000 42303 Fire-1 Time Permit 9,500 480 1,320 - 480 480 480 - 3,240 34.1% 9,500 11000000 42401 Encroachment Permits 846,400 19,199 249,475 25,543 44,185 25,684 51,702 41,857 457,645 54.1% 846,400 11000000 42402 Grading Permits 34,500 1,372 - - - - - - 1,372 4.0% 34,500 11000000 42403 Zoning Permits 226,300 1,702 9,156 39,806 18,233 10,922 10,501 2,295 92,615 40.9% 226,300 11000000 42404 Pass-Thru Plan Application Fee 52,300 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 52,300 11000000 42405 Trucking Permits - 656 696 224 894 574 1,828 382 5,254 - FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - Rev Details (Monthly) REVENUE DETAILS (FY26, PER MONTH)
By Fund, Category
Program Obj Lookup FY26 Adopted Jul 2025 Aug 2025 Sep 2025 Oct 2025 Nov 2025 Dec 2025 Jan 2026 FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE PROJ 11000000 42501 Building Permit 2,607,300 84,819 105,727 138,375 108,588 98,039 63,485 499,282 1,098,315 42.1% 2,607,300 4O-Licenses & Permits Subtotal 4,737,800 150,342 392,654 226,887 192,446 150,361 147,747 566,977 1,827,414 38.6% 4,737,800 11000000 43001 Fines and Forfeits 63,700 6,539 - 3,454 5,341 6,666 10,590 17,660 50,251 78.9% 63,700 11000000 43004 Parking Citations 290,100 1,120 17,436 1,312 27,096 1,279 18,730 23,869 90,842 31.3% 290,100 11000000 43005 Neighborhd Preserv Citn 31,900 - 4,952 - 38,506 - 4,137 23,652 71,247 223.3% 31,900 11000000 43006 Firework Citations 30,000 1,000 3,000 - - - (3,050) - 950 3.2% 30,000 4P-Fines & Forteitures Subtotal 415,700 8,659 25,388 4,766 70,943 7,945 30,407 65,181 213,290 51.3% 415,700 11000000 45101 Administrative Fees 400,000 101,329 20,185 20,239 20,146 55,702 21,375 107,945 346,921 86.7% 400,000 11015014 45101 Administrative Fees 20,700 - - (11) (4) (4) - (7) (25) -0.1% 20,700 11000000 45104 Reports 17,400 880 920 2,419 1,520 420 1,117 2,227 9,503 54.6% 17,400 11000000 45105 Service Fees 36,900 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 36,900 11021001 45105 Service Fees 37,100 3,987 3,095 1,168 1,230 2,198 3,953 1,993 17,624 47.5% 37,100 11033023 45105 Service Fees 55,000 - - 7,431 - - 7,431 - 14,861 27.0% 55,000 11000000 45107 Plan Check Fees 1,354,000 70,881 53,201 84,172 70,319 43,456 19,332 258,484 599,843 44.3% 1,354,000 11033004 45107 Plan Check Fees 345,000 6,680 - - - - - - 6,680 1.9% 345,000 11000000 45108 Inspection Fees 131,000 8,440 6,058 1,980 7,579 7,608 8,807 5,815 46,287 35.3% 131,000 11000000 45109 Bldg-Other Fees 3,600 - - - - 145 - - 145 4.0% 3,600 11033023 45110 Transit Bus Shelter Cleang Chg 1,600 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 1,600 11000000 45113 Parking Meters 17,500 - - - - - 155 11 165 0.9% 17,500 11046001 45113 Parking Meters - 3,316 3,689 3,677 2,291 1,674 1,539 - 16,186 - 11000000 45114 Animal Control Fees - - - - 264 - - - 264 - 11033004 45115 Technology Fee - 27 - - - - - - 27 -
11041002 45115 Technology Fee 31,800 1,491 1,945 2,414 1,932 1,494 1,226 - 10,502 33.0% 31,800 11000000 45116 Commercial Cannabis Appl Fee 16,800 - - - - - - 3,200 3,200 19.0% 16,800 11021001 45120 Contrib-Outside/Private Source 36,900 - - 44,455 - - - - 44,455 120.5% 36,900 11033023 45120 Contrib-Outside/Private Source 17,600 1,600 2,400 2,500 2,550 2,600 1,700 - 13,350 75.9% 17,600 11000000 45122 DUI Accident Recovery Fee 5,700 298 785 356 228 525 291 353 2,837 49.8% 5,700 11000000 45201 Burglar Alarm Response Fee 4,400 - 430 516 - 430 258 1,032 2,666 60.6% 4,400 11000000 45202 Concealed Weapon 10,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 10,000 11041022 45308 UL Pylon Sign Lic/Maint Fee 75,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 75,000 11041002 45310 General Plan Cost Recovery Fee - 1,713 3,102 4,428 3,291 3,531 2,787 - 18,852 - 11041004 45310 General Plan Cost Recovery Fee 80,850 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 80,850 11041002 45311 Community Dev Plan Storage Fee 5,200 703 978 1,645 933 840 449 - 5,548 106.7% 5,200 11033002 45403 Map Filing Fee 20,000 - - - 14,336 - - - 14,336 71.7% 20,000 11052003 45501 Recreational Activities Fees 5,500 2,585 1,230 2,616 7,154 1,737 2,002 - 17,324 315.0% 5,500 11052016 45501 Recreational Activities Fees 500 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 500 11052036 45501 Recreational Activities Fees 800 465 435 505 595 595 585 - 3,180 397.5% 800 11051005 45502 Gym memberships 401,700 40,858 44,126 36,543 34,184 33,198 44,029 11,790 244,727 60.9% 401,700 11000000 45504 Facility use fees 200 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 200 11051005 45504 Facility use fees 4,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 4,000 11052028 45504 Facility use fees 14,000 - 2,225 4,045 1,260 2,425 240 200 10,395 74.3% 14,000 11052022 45506 Community Gardens 3,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 3,000 11000000 45509 Gym Specialty Classes 4,500 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 4,500 11051005 45509 Gym Specialty Classes - 589 167 10 - - 5,199 - 5,965 - 4Q-Fees and Charges Subtotal 3,158,250 245,842 144,969 221,107 169,810 158,574 122,474 393,042 1,455,817 46.1% 3,158,250 11000000 44102 Vehicle Lic Collectn in Excess 76,300 - - 107,161 - - - - 107,161 140.4% 76,300 11000000 44103 Mandated Cost Reimbursement 40,000 - 83,455 - - - - - 83,455 208.6% 40,000 11021002 44121 P.O.S.T. Reimbursement - - 2,349 763 586 - - 24 3,723 - 11000000 44123 Public Safety Augment-Prop 172 621,300 - 57,646 - 92,105 - 102,363 - 252,113 40.6% 621,300 11000000 44161 Misc State Revenues 16,600 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 16,600 4S-State Revenues Subtotal 754,200 - 143,450 107,925 92,691 - 102,363 24 446,452 59.2% 754,200 11000000 46101 Investment Earnings 3,448,100 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 3,448,100 FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - Rev Details (Monthly) REVENUE DETAILS (FY26, PER MONTH)
By Fund, Category
Program Obj Lookup FY26 Adopted Jul 2025 Aug 2025 Sep 2025 Oct 2025 Nov 2025 Dec 2025 Jan 2026 FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE PROJ 11000000 46102 Invest Earnings Distrib (1,120,200) - - - - - - - - 0.0% (1,120,200) 11000000 46108 Rental Income 267,700 14,888 15,770 19,691 13,925 19,922 23,724 27,860 135,779 50.7% 267,700 11041201 46108 Rental Income 61,200 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 61,200 4U-Investment Income Subtotal 2,656,800 14,888 15,770 19,691 13,925 19,922 23,724 27,860 135,779 5.1% 2,656,800 11000000 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 1,000,000 - 389 29,239 14,766 - 20 45 44,458 4.4% 1,000,000 11012030 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - - 1,000 - - - - - 1,000 - 11014001 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 19 - - - - - - 19 - 11015011 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 24,612 7,140 7,163 7,164 7,304 - - 53,383 - 11021001 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - - - - 500 - - 1,996 2,496 - 11021002 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 6 - 75 - - 299 423 803 - 11041002 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - - - - - 104 - - 104 - 11041004 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 1,983 2,710 1,036 1,445 1,008 1,272 1,526 10,980 - 11051005 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 249 223 104 230 1,269 150 - 2,224 - 11051005 47105 Donations - 5 - - - - 3,000 - 3,005 -
11052036 47105 Donations - - - 1,000 - - 970 - 1,970 -
11000000 47106 Skyventure Payment 34,800 - 13,358 - - - - 8,705 22,063 63.4% 34,800 11000000 47111 CALVEBA Admin Fee Reimbursemnt - 8 9 9 14 9 9 9 67 - 11000000 47114 Credit Card/Convenience Fee 18,300 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 18,300 4V-MiscellaneousRevenue Subtotal 1,053,100 26,882 24,828 38,626 24,118 9,693 5,720 12,705 142,572 13.5% 1,053,100 11000000 49501 Sale of property 2,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 2,000 4Y-Procd frSaleCapAsset Subtotal 2,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 2,000 11000000 49610 Transfer In 18,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 18,000 4Z-Transfer In Subtotal 18,000 - - - - - - - - 0.0% 18,000 110-GENERAL FUND TOTAL 85,290,814 (1,184,660) 5,590,008 1,877,346 3,075,530 4,770,324 14,475,714 9,972,314 38,576,576 45.2% 85,290,814 FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - Rev Details (Monthly)

REVENUE DETAILS (ANNUAL)
By Fund, Category Unaudited At 1/31/26
Program Obj Lookup FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE PROJ 11000000 41110 Property Tax-Secured 14,915,476 15,920,043 16,451,385 17,770,900 8,691,109 48.9% 17,770,900 11000000 41111 Property Tax-Unsecured 998,844 1,160,759 1,220,114 974,800 - 0.0% 974,800 4A-Prop Tax-Sec & Unsec Subtotal 15,914,320 17,080,802 17,671,499 18,745,700 8,691,109 46.4% 18,745,700 11000000 41112 Prop Tax-Supplemental 663,130 592,656 399,118 650,400 79,461 12.2% 650,400 4B-Prop Tax-Supplementa Subtotal 663,130 592,656 399,118 650,400 79,461 12.2% 650,400 11000000 41123 Prop Tax-Veh Lic Fee Swap 8,472,448 9,035,866 9,476,816 9,846,400 4,954,006 50.3% 9,846,400 4C-Prop Tax-VLF in Lieu Subtotal 8,472,448 9,035,866 9,476,816 9,846,400 4,954,006 50.3% 9,846,400 11000000 41113 Property Tax-Prior Year 190,541 209,186 261,066 225,700 182,393 80.8% 225,700 11000000 41114 Property Tax-Penalties 85,809 126,201 148,283 147,000 - 0.0% 147,000 11000000 41115 Property Tax-Misc 3,660 321 14 300 - 0.0% 300 11000000 41116 Homeowners Prop Tax Rel 101,435 99,887 99,048 101,500 - 0.0% 101,500 11000000 41124 Special Assessment-Prior Year - 4,972 3,345 500 601 120.2% 500 11000000 41127 Residual Distribution re RDA 2,929,470 3,001,454 3,273,399 3,122,700 2,224,028 71.2% 3,122,700 4D-Prop Taxes-Other Subtotal 3,310,915 3,442,021 3,785,157 3,597,700 2,407,023 66.9% 3,597,700 11000000 41201 Sales Tax 12,456,279 11,464,078 11,453,140 11,532,500 4,784,863 41.5% 11,532,500 11000000 41202 Meas AA Sales Tax 7,174,437 6,918,301 6,967,465 6,605,000 2,812,800 42.6% 6,605,000 4E-Sales and Use Taxes Subtotal 19,630,716 18,382,379 18,420,605 18,137,500 7,597,663 41.9% 18,137,500 11000000 41301 Transient Occupancy Tax-Hotel 1,713,399 1,408,771 1,448,106 1,494,500 591,111 39.6% 1,494,500 11000000 41302 Transient Occupancy Tax-Other 119,373 136,455 140,575 143,400 73,560 51.3% 143,400 4F-TransntOccupancy Tax Subtotal 1,832,773 1,545,226 1,588,681 1,637,900 664,671 40.6% 1,637,900 11000000 41401 Franchise Tax-Electric 771,302 842,597 994,700 933,500 - 0.0% 933,500 11000000 41402 Franchise Tax-Gas 270,762 264,680 240,234 321,900 - 0.0% 321,900 11000000 41403 Franchise Tax-Disposal 3,755,256 4,066,222 4,000,000 4,447,163 2,998,936 67.4% 4,447,163 11000000 41404 Franchise Tax-Cable TV 497,273 447,146 429,700 412,900 20,339 4.9% 412,900 11000000 41405 Franchise Fee - Towing 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 100.0% 15,000 11000000 41406 Franchise Tax-Recycling 516,288 754,256 769,100 709,101 - 0.0% 709,101 4G-Franchises Subtotal 5,825,882 6,389,901 6,448,735 6,839,564 3,034,275 44.4% 6,839,564 11000000 41501 Business License Tax 1,897,354 2,359,898 3,283,776 4,800,000 3,104,910 64.7% 4,800,000 4H-Business Lic Taxes Subtotal 1,897,354 2,359,898 3,283,776 4,800,000 3,104,910 64.7% 4,800,000 11000000 41901 Utility Users Tax - Electric 3,949,364 4,392,407 4,818,499 4,866,300 2,587,540 53.2% 4,866,300 11000000 41902 Utility Users Tax - Gas 1,210,810 1,041,140 1,160,519 1,266,200 444,535 35.1% 1,266,200 11000000 41903 Utility Users Tax - Telecom 642,174 634,086 651,862 585,500 300,886 51.4% 585,500 11000000 41904 Utility Users Tax - Video 493,510 528,843 402,564 528,800 179,696 34.0% 528,800 11000000 41909 UUT - Penalties & Interests 5 - - - - -
4L-Utility Users Taxes Subtotal 6,295,863 6,596,476 7,033,443 7,246,800 3,512,657 48.5% 7,246,800 11000000 41601 Real Prop Transfer Tax 322,712 280,526 489,104 396,900 192,193 48.4% 396,900 11000000 41802 Cannabis-Non-Cultivation 688,917 410,651 449,826 596,100 111,243 18.7% 596,100 4M-Taxes-Other Subtotal 1,011,629 691,176 938,929 993,000 303,436 30.6% 993,000 11000000 42101 Animal Licenses 10,745 7,362 8,697 10,000 4,615 46.2% 10,000 FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - Rev Details (Annual)

REVENUE DETAILS (ANNUAL)
By Fund, Category Unaudited At 1/31/26
Program Obj Lookup FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE PROJ 11000000 42104 PG&E Streetlight License 32,251 31,601 40,773 33,100 27,295 82.5% 33,100 11000000 42120 Small Cell Pole Master License 8,000 - 2,215 - 650 - 11000000 42201 Parking Permits-Residential 16,993 3,000 5,039 5,000 1,165 13.9% 5,000 11000000 42202 Burglar Alarm Registration Fee 59,934 63,415 58,469 - 29,324 - 11000000 42203 Parking Permits-Station Dist - 10,800 12,480 15,000 6,480 43.2% 15,000 11000000 42301 Fire-Annual Code Permit 258,964 263,275 22,643 275,000 48,271 17.6% 275,000 11000000 42302 Haz Mat Storage Permit 510,047 627,701 577,809 620,000 51,174 8.3% 620,000 11000000 42303 Fire-1 Time Permit 11,379 9,714 11,784 9,500 3,240 34.1% 9,500 11000000 42401 Encroachment Permits 319,146 735,974 788,620 846,400 457,645 54.1% 846,400 11000000 42402 Grading Permits 6,154 17,652 27,099 34,500 1,372 4.0% 34,500 11000000 42403 Zoning Permits 132,363 196,751 195,711 226,300 92,615 40.9% 226,300 11000000 42404 Pass-Thru Plan Application Fee 81,606 3,458 1,654 52,300 - 0.0% 52,300 11000000 42405 Trucking Permits - - 9,038 - 5,254 -
11000000 42501 Building Permit 1,530,296 1,778,940 1,756,212 2,607,300 1,098,315 42.1% 2,607,300 11021001 42201 Parking Permits-Residential - - - 3,400 - 3,400 4O-Licenses & Permits Subtotal 2,977,876 3,749,643 3,518,243 4,737,800 1,827,414 38.6% 4,737,800 11000000 43001 Fines and Forfeits 58,993 86,637 70,390 63,700 50,251 78.9% 63,700 11000000 43004 Parking Citations 180,828 204,213 163,377 290,100 90,842 31.3% 290,100 11000000 43005 Neighborhd Preserv Citn 24,121 56,717 49,434 31,900 71,247 223.3% 31,900 11000000 43006 Firework Citations - - 1,000 30,000 950 3.2% 30,000 4P-Fines & Forteitures Subtotal 263,941 347,567 284,201 415,700 213,290 51.3% 415,700 11000000 45101 Administrative Fees 332,878 291,622 445,030 400,000 346,921 86.7% 400,000 11015014 45101 Administrative Fees 20,931 21,312 5,442 20,700 (25) -0.1% 20,700 11084029 45101 Administrative Fees 4,790 - - - - -
11084148 45101 Administrative Fees 2,816 - - - - -
11084149 45101 Administrative Fees 72,760 - - - - -
11084154 45101 Administrative Fees 1,248 - - - - -
11084155 45101 Administrative Fees - 5,338 - - - -
11084156 45101 Administrative Fees - 6,464 - - - -
11084164 45101 Administrative Fees - - 6,874 - - -
11084165 45101 Administrative Fees - - 10,627 - - -
11000000 45104 Reports 20,133 19,355 22,462 17,400 9,503 54.6% 17,400 11000000 45105 Service Fees 43,739 19,890 - 36,900 - 0.0% 36,900 11021001 45105 Service Fees 1,577 40,333 44,327 37,100 17,624 47.5% 37,100 11021004 45105 Service Fees - 10,944 656 - - -
11033023 45105 Service Fees 29,723 29,723 59,446 55,000 14,861 27.0% 55,000 11000000 45107 Plan Check Fees 1,251,260 1,085,988 1,580,111 1,354,000 599,843 44.3% 1,354,000 11033004 45107 Plan Check Fees - 262,567 286,483 345,000 6,680 1.9% 345,000 11000000 45108 Inspection Fees 146,288 89,750 127,138 131,000 46,287 35.3% 131,000 FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - Rev Details (Annual)

REVENUE DETAILS (ANNUAL)
By Fund, Category Unaudited At 1/31/26
Program Obj Lookup FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE PROJ 11000000 45109 Bldg-Other Fees 1,302 1,102 725 3,600 145 4.0% 3,600 11033023 45110 Transit Bus Shelter Cleang Chg 1,155 - - 1,600 - 0.0% 1,600 11000000 45113 Parking Meters 16,516 - - 17,500 165 0.9% 17,500 11046001 45113 Parking Meters - 12,703 22,402 - 16,186 - 11000000 45114 Animal Control Fees - - 660 - 264 -
11000000 45115 Technology Fee 25,340 - - - - -
11033004 45115 Technology Fee - 105 181 - 27 -
11041002 45115 Technology Fee - 32,783 32,489 31,800 10,502 33.0% 31,800 11000000 45116 Commercial Cannabis Appl Fee 31,275 10,693 - 16,800 3,200 19.0% 16,800 11021001 45120 Contrib-Outside/Private Source 81,199 (6,046) 42,761 36,900 44,455 120.5% 36,900 11033023 45120 Contrib-Outside/Private Source 26,185 30,050 24,126 17,600 13,350 75.9% 17,600 11000000 45121 Damage Recovery - - 41,326 - - -
11000000 45122 DUI Accident Recovery Fee 4,511 3,912 11,133 5,700 2,837 49.8% 5,700 11000000 45201 Burglar Alarm Response Fee 2,341 3,091 2,564 4,400 2,666 60.6% 4,400 11000000 45202 Concealed Weapon - - 5,250 10,000 - 0.0% 10,000 11000000 45308 UL Pylon Sign Lic/Maint Fee 59,856 - - - - - 11041022 45308 UL Pylon Sign Lic/Maint Fee - 61,494 91,790 75,000 - 0.0% 75,000 11041002 45310 General Plan Cost Recovery Fee - 90,447 89,572 - 18,852 - 11041004 45310 General Plan Cost Recovery Fee 70,639 - - 80,850 - 0.0% 80,850 11041002 45311 Community Dev Plan Storage Fee - 20,003 20,660 5,200 5,548 106.7% 5,200 11041004 45311 Community Dev Plan Storage Fee 15,825 - - - - - 11033002 45403 Map Filing Fee 14,481 5,643 16,407 20,000 14,336 71.7% 20,000 11033024 45411 Tree Replacement In-Lieu-Fee - - 4,550 - - - 11033025 45411 Tree Replacement In-Lieu-Fee - - 8,400 - - - 11033002 45412 Stormwater In-Lieu Fee - - 87,300 - - -
11051005 45501 Recreational Activities Fees - 97 - - - - 11052003 45501 Recreational Activities Fees - 5,374 25,288 5,500 17,324 315.0% 5,500 11052016 45501 Recreational Activities Fees 500 - - 500 - 0.0% 500 11052036 45501 Recreational Activities Fees 1,425 1,525 4,410 800 3,180 397.5% 800 11000000 45502 Gym memberships 335,613 - - - - -
11051005 45502 Gym memberships - 382,369 415,324 401,700 244,727 60.9% 401,700 11000000 45504 Facility use fees - - - 200 - 0.0% 200
11051005 45504 Facility use fees - 2,580 - 4,000 - 0.0% 4,000 11052028 45504 Facility use fees 12,580 24,890 14,762 14,000 10,395 74.3% 14,000 11052022 45506 Community Gardens - - - 3,000 - 0.0% 3,000 11000000 45509 Gym Specialty Classes 9,433 - - 4,500 - 0.0% 4,500 11051005 45509 Gym Specialty Classes - 5,453 4,715 - 5,965 - 4Q-Fees and Charges Subtotal 2,638,319 2,571,553 3,555,390 3,158,250 1,455,817 46.1% 3,158,250 11081200 44041 FEMA - 113,582 - - 6,041 -
FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - Rev Details (Annual)

REVENUE DETAILS (ANNUAL)
By Fund, Category Unaudited At 1/31/26
Program Obj Lookup FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE PROJ 11081500 44041 FEMA - 65,553 23,696 - - -
11081501 44041 FEMA - - 6,559 - - -
11000000 44061 Misc. Federal Grant 14,007 - - - - -
4R-Federal Revenues Subtotal 14,007 179,134 30,255 - 6,041 - 11021143 44011 Justice Assistance Grants 16,886 - - - - - 11021144 44011 Justice Assistance Grants - 15,990 - - - - 11000000 44102 Vehicle Lic Collectn in Excess 71,789 86,511 110,515 76,300 107,161 140.4% 76,300 11000000 44103 Mandated Cost Reimbursement 23,745 74,245 82,090 40,000 83,455 208.6% 40,000 11021002 44121 P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 30,720 65,016 23,114 - 3,723 - 11000000 44123 Public Safety Augment-Prop 172 622,803 587,896 601,008 621,300 252,113 40.6% 621,300 11000000 44161 Misc State Revenues - - 811 16,600 - 0.0% 16,600 11092109 44161 Misc State Revenues - 15,705 - - - -
4S-State Revenues Subtotal 765,944 845,363 817,538 754,200 446,452 59.2% 754,200 11051020 44502 Misc. County/Local Grant 5,326 3,100 - - - - 11051027 44502 Misc. County/Local Grant 0 12,991 - - - - 4T-County & LocalGovRev Subtotal 5,326 16,091 - - - -
11000000 46101 Investment Earnings 1,911,426 3,250,150 3,347,700 3,448,100 - 0.0% 3,448,100 11000000 46102 Invest Earnings Distrib (638,466) (1,055,930) (1,087,600) (1,120,200) - 0.0% (1,120,200) 11000000 46103 Gain/Loss On Investment (1,092,936) 1,885,369 - - - - 11000000 46104 Amortize/Gain/Loss on Invests (32,552) 10,721 - - - - 11000000 46107 Interest on Home Loans 83 - - - - -
11000000 46108 Rental Income 214,153 252,370 326,558 267,700 135,779 50.7% 267,700 11041201 46108 Rental Income 53,295 61,200 25,500 61,200 - 0.0% 61,200 11000000 46115 GASB 87 Lease Income (2,273) 25,079 - - - - 4U-Investment Income Subtotal 412,729 4,428,959 2,612,158 2,656,800 135,779 5.1% 2,656,800 11000000 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 28,063 - 4,242 1,000,000 44,458 4.4% 1,000,000 11012030 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 137,461 1,000 - - 1,000 - 11014001 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 220 335 390 - 19 - 11015011 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 863 15,050 292,863 - 53,383 - 11021001 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 2,524 105,056 - 2,496 - 11021002 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 1,886 - 1,958 - 803 - 11021003 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 89 16,804 7 - - - 11033001 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 8,678 17,375 334 - - - 11033011 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - - 426 - - -
11033023 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts 2,387 447 1,620 - - - 11033024 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - - (7,637) - - - 11041002 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 692 39 - 104 -
11041004 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 19,117 22,952 - 10,980 - 11051005 47101 Miscellaneous Receipts - 3,066 2,956 - 2,224 - FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - Rev Details (Annual)

REVENUE DETAILS (ANNUAL)
By Fund, Category Unaudited At 1/31/26
Program Obj Lookup FY23 Actual FY24 Actual FY25 Actual FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE PROJ 11000000 47105 Donations 33,202 - - - - -
11051005 47105 Donations - 4,081 2,043 - 3,005 -
11051009 47105 Donations - 31,000 - - - -
11051030 47105 Donations 77,020 48,000 18,000 - - -
11052036 47105 Donations 1,991 - - - 1,970 -
11081200 47105 Donations 97 - - - - -
11000000 47106 Skyventure Payment 27,812 45,694 63,622 34,800 22,063 63.4% 34,800 11000000 47108 Cash Short/Over - (200) - - - -
11090924 47110 Excess SIR Reimbursement 14,338 11,020 - - - - 11000000 47111 CALVEBA Admin Fee Reimbursemnt 92 104 182 - 67 - 11000000 47114 Credit Card/Convenience Fee 17,614 19,688 7,000 18,300 - 0.0% 18,300 11000000 47119 Settlements - - 150,000 - - -
11021001 47120 Sale of PD Promotional Items - 751 - - - - 4V-MiscellaneousRevenue Subtotal 351,811 236,550 666,052 1,053,100 142,572 13.5% 1,053,100 11015012 49402 Proceeds Lease Financing - 690,861 - - - - 11081010 49402 Proceeds Lease Financing 511,078 - - - - - 11000000 49501 Sale of property 2,137 1,200 - 2,000 - 0.0% 2,000 11000000 49505 Gain/Loss Sale of Real Estate - 8,581 - - - - 4Y-Procd frSaleCapAsset Subtotal 2,137 9,781 - 2,000 - 0.0% 2,000 11000000 49610 Transfer In 7,049,913 818,000 943,000 18,000 - 0.0% 18,000 4Z-Transfer In Subtotal 7,049,913 818,000 943,000 18,000 - 0.0% 18,000 110-GENERAL FUND TOTAL 79,848,113 80,009,902 81,473,596 85,290,814 38,576,576 45.2% 85,290,814 FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - Rev Details (Annual) General Fund - Expenditure by Object Code
110-GENERAL FUND At 1/31/26 % of Year
Expenditure by Object Code FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj Note 51110 Regular Pay 28,584,855 15,284,184 53.5% 26,201,300 51111 Regular Part-Time Pay 609,722 664,488 109.0% 1,139,200 51112 Seasonal Part-Time/Temp Pay 492,398 498,102 101.2% 854,000 51113 Holiday Pay 658,792 341,355 51.8% 585,000
51115 Overtime Pay 1,595,735 1,579,919 99.0% 2,708,500
51117 Uniform/Auto/Cell Allowance 160,984 86,165 53.5% 147,500 51118 Meal Allowance 6,830 4,661 68.2% 8,000
51130 Anticipated Salary Savings (2,300,000) - 0.0% -
5A-Salaries and Wages Total 29,809,316 18,458,874 61.9% 31,643,500 52110 Medicare Tax 423,321 260,204 61.5% 446,100
52111 PERS 4,146,715 2,395,869 57.8% 4,107,300
52112 Health Insurance 4,030,536 1,806,909 44.8% 3,097,800 52113 Workers Compensation (ISF) 362,560 1,521,178 419.6% 362,600 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 52114 Deferred Compensation 62,574 40,932 65.4% 70,100
52115 Disability Insurance 46,257 28,544 61.7% 48,800
52116 Unemployment Insurance - 11,143 0.0% 19,100
52117 Cal-Veba 23,514 14,798 62.9% 25,400
52118 POA Retiree Medical-City Match 200,000 111,431 55.7% 191,000 52120 CalPERS UAL Payment 9,308,544 9,357,166 100.5% 9,357,000 YE Proj = YTD Actuals 5B-Employee Benefits Total 18,604,020 15,548,174 83.6% 17,725,200 53101 Office Supplies (Exclud Paper) 69,613 10,245 14.7% 17,400 53102 Data Processing Supplies 34,200 3,644 10.7% 6,200 53103 Photo Supplies (Retire) 14,233 288 2.0% 500
53104 Books 11,293 2,162 19.1% 3,700
53105 Election Materials 1,000 - 0.0% -
53201 Firearms & Supplies 160,462 69,223 43.1% 160,500 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 53202 K-9 Provisions 16,313 8,540 52.4% 14,600
53301 Fuel (Gasoline, Etc) - 1,567 0.0% 2,700
53401 Janitorial Supplies 11,930 433 3.6% 800
53402 Building Supplies 90,500 31,204 34.5% 53,500
53504 Traffic Safety 19,000 1,464 7.7% 2,500
53601 Recreational Supplies 45,900 8,891 19.4% 15,200
53701 Other Supplies 186,075 25,931 13.9% 44,300
53702 Rain Gear/Uniform Acces 13,250 1,220 9.2% 2,100
53703 Safety Supplies 70,000 15,522 22.2% 26,600
53704 Small Tools 900 106 11.7% 200
53801 Paper Supplies (SB1383) 27,150 12,261 45.2% 21,100 53901 PD Promotional Items 3,000 - 0.0% -
5C-Supplies Total 774,819 192,702 24.9% 371,900
54105 Admin Fees-Prop & Sales Taxes 111,159 71,892 64.7% 123,200 54110 Professional/Consulting 2,768,584 1,069,299 38.6% 2,768,500 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 54111 Contractual Services 20,187,265 9,262,947 45.9% 20,187,300 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 54112 Legal Services 705,301 243,424 34.5% 705,300 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 54113 Contract EEs/Comm Stipends 90,560 22,578 24.9% 38,700 54116 Banking Services Fees 142,600 145,442 102.0% 249,300 54117 Health Insurance Admin 20,600 5,226 25.4% 9,000
54118 Sub-grants 247,147 80,481 32.6% 138,000
54119 Prisoner Booking Fees 26,125 - 0.0% -
54120 Laboratory Charges 80,125 35,147 43.9% 60,300
54121 Election Services 500 - 0.0% -
54123 Repair/Maint-Radios 144,072 102,672 71.3% 176,000 54124 Repair/Maint-Other 364,264 72,907 20.0% 125,000
54125 Laundry 24,500 26,233 107.1% 45,000
54126 Fleet-Vehicle Maint (ISF) 901,069 537,386 59.6% 921,100 54127 Fleet-Vehicle Replace (ISF) 479,820 279,895 58.3% 479,800 FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - 2026-03 Mid Year Summaries General Fund - Expenditure by Object Code
110-GENERAL FUND At 1/31/26 % of Year
Expenditure by Object Code FY26 Adopted FY26 YTD 58.3% FY26 YE Proj Note 54128 Haz Mat Haulage/Disposal 3,000 - 0.0% -
54130 Janitorial Services 555,000 237,826 42.9% 407,700 54135 Hardware & Software Maint 206,796 93,562 45.2% 160,400 54143 Risk Management (ISF) 1,799,470 1,049,692 58.3% 1,799,600 54144 Enterprise Fuel 292,600 130,504 44.6% 223,700
54205 Internet Circuit 115,000 50,515 43.9% 86,600
54206 Cell Phone 218,745 91,989 42.1% 157,700
54207 Data Circuits 131,323 47,673 36.3% 81,700
54210 Postage 69,850 14,593 20.9% 25,100
54211 Telephone 25,826 - 0.0% -
54213 Ads,Publications,Promos 50,100 30,167 60.2% 51,800 54214 Paper Printing Svcs (SB1383) 142,369 23,280 16.4% 40,000 54215 Membership Dues 134,472 81,448 60.6% 139,600
54216 Subscriptions 13,965 10,826 77.5% 18,600
54217 Rentals 63,300 29,486 46.6% 50,500
54218 Community Promotions 15,058 2,472 16.4% 4,300
54220 Taxes, Licenses & Fees 24,350 2,626 10.8% 4,500
54222 Care Of Prisoners 6,000 - 0.0% -
54235 Electricity 598,550 245,125 41.0% 598,600 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 54236 Natural Gas 32,000 13,484 42.1% 32,000 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 54237 Water 385,200 181,449 47.1% 385,200 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 54238 Sewer 57,205 56,348 98.5% 96,600
54244 Printing & Reprod (non SB1383) 11,306 5,118 45.3% 8,700 54305 Citywide Training 32,000 4,788 15.0% 32,000 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 54310 Travel & Training 306,160 31,391 10.3% 53,900
54311 Travel/Train-Reimburse 264,975 15,554 5.9% 26,800 54312 Travel/Train Non-reimb 82,301 29,503 35.8% 50,700 54313 Local Meeting & Events 67,975 29,625 43.6% 50,900 54320 Tuition Reimbursement-SEIU 9,000 - 0.0% -
54321 Tuition Reimb-Unrep'd Non-Mgmt 9,000 - 0.0% -
54322 Tuition Reimbursement-PEG 9,000 1,050 11.7% 1,800 54323 Tuition Reimbursement-MEG 9,000 - 0.0% -
54324 Tuition Reimb-Unrep'd Mgmt 9,000 - 0.0% -
54325 Tuition Reimbursement-PMA 9,000 - 0.0% -
54450 Pre-Development Costs 20,000 - 0.0% -
54505 Donated Funds 1,000 900 90.0% 1,500
5D-Services Total 32,073,587 14,466,521 45.1% 30,617,000 57100 CIP Project Budget 1,339,500 - 0.0% 1,339,500 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 57115 CIP Design, Mgmt & Observ Svcs - 133,628 0.0% - YE Proj = Adopted Budget 57125 Building Improvements - 27,332 0.0% - YE Proj = Adopted Budget 57130 Other Capital Equipment 234,579 83,953 35.8% 234,500 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 57140 Motor Vehicles 95,000 - 0.0% 95,000 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 57170 Furniture & Fixtures 43,500 - 0.0% 43,500 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 5I-CapOutlay Total 1,712,579 244,912 14.3% 1,712,500
58310 Capital Lease-Principal 702,207 346,878 49.4% 702,200 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 58320 Capital Lease-Interest 61,414 28,981 47.2% 61,300 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 5G-Debt-LeaseObl Total 763,620 375,859 49.2% 763,500
59101 Transfer Out 2,255,815 1,315,895 58.3% 2,255,800 YE Proj = Adopted Budget 5L-Transfer Out Total 2,255,815 1,315,895 58.3% 2,255,800 Total General Fund Expenditures 85,993,757 50,602,937 58.8% 85,089,400 FY26 Budget Analysis (current).xlsx - 2026-03 Mid Year Summaries Item 5.2.

Second Quarter Financial Report
for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
March 10, 2026

2 Strategic Plan Alignment
• Goal A: Financial Stability & Sustainability
• Quarterly Report to the City Council
üIncrease transparency
üTrack performance and improve management objectives
üIntended for internal analysis. Not audited. Partial data

3 General Fund Revenues
Revenues are not received consistently every month

4 General Fund Revenues
FY26 General Fund
revenues are
projected to be
$85.3 Million at
fiscal year end –
Similar to FY26
Adopted numbers.

5 General Fund Revenues
Positive revenue categories

6 General Fund Revenues
Revenue categories to watch

7 General Fund Expenditures
Attachment 3 provides details of expenditure categories Overall: Continue to monitor revenues and delay expenditures • FY26 Revenues: $85.3 million
• FY26 Expenditures: $85.1 million
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 5 March 10, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 5.3
DATE: March 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Receive a Report on the Results of the Community Survey to Consider Placing a Measure on the November 2026 Ballot to Extend the Utility Users' Tax and Provide Direction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Council has been considering whether to seek voter approval to extend, and potentially increase, the existing Utility Users’ Tax (“UUT”), which is scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2028. To inform this discussion, the City retained Godbe Research to conduct a statistically reliable survey of likely November 2026 voters to gauge community attitudes toward potential UUT extensions and rate adjustments.

The survey results provide insight into voter perspectives regarding possible rate increases, duration options, and continued support for the existing tax. Based on these results, staff is seeking City Council direction on whether to continue exploring a potential ballot measure for the November 2026 General Municipal Election.

If the City Council is supportive of further exploration, staff requests initial direction on the general framework of a potential measure, including possible tax rates and duration. With City Council support, staff would begin a community education effort to share information with residents about the potential extension of the UUT and return to the City Council at a future meeting for consideration of final ballot language.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This item is in alignment with Goal A. Financial Stability and Sustainability of the City Council Strategic Plan. Under Goal A, it is specifically related to the following strategies:
• Strategy 1: Develop a comprehensive fiscal sustainability model to address the General Fund’s long-term structural deficit.
• Strategy 8: Determine the feasibility of a revenue ballot measure for November 2024 and/or November 2026 to address critical facilities and infrastructure needs. • Strategy 9: Pursue the placement of a voter-approved revenue measure on a ballot to address the funding gap between revenues and expenditures for fundamental public safety and other city services.

Agenda Item No. 5.3
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 5 March 10, 2026

BACKGROUND
On a regular and ongoing basis, the City conducts a comprehensive review of its longterm financial forecast, which was most recently presented to the City Council at the City Council retreat on August 23, 2025. This is to ensure the City may continue to fund core services and to help plan and prepare for any unprecedented fiscal challenges or economic uncertainties that may arise. While the City currently maintains a healthy General Fund reserve, this is primarily due to salary savings from vacant positions, deferred maintenance and capital projects, and assistance during the pandemic through an influx of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. The General Fund is currently projected to fall to the minimum reserve fund balance of twenty percent of its annual operating expenditures by 2029. This anticipated operating budget deficit is approximately $2.8 million per year.

There is a need to identify new and ongoing stable revenue sources to address the operating budget deficit and to provide the City with long-term stability. Hence, it is not constantly facing a “fiscal cliff.” Prudently, the City Council has expressed its commitment to protecting reserve levels and its interest in exploring voter-approved revenue measures to provide financial stability and maintain existing service levels. In 2020, voters approved the initial UUT; in 2022, voters approved an extension of the City’s one-half cent sales tax; and in 2024, voters approved an update to the business license tax.

The City engaged TeamCivX and Godbe Research to evaluate possible approaches to stabilize and increase revenues. Specifically, the City Council considered either increasing the citywide Landscape and Lighting District (“LLAD”) or extending and possibly increasing the existing UUT. To facilitate this analysis, the City Council formed an Ad Hoc Subcommittee in September 2025, comprising Mayor Singh and Councilmember Nishihira. After consideration of the Ad Hoc Subcommittee’s analysis and recommendation, the City Council concurred that it would prioritize an extension of the existing UUT because the measure would otherwise sunset in 2028. Also, the LLAD had a more flexible timeline that was not dictated by the calendar of the November state-wide general election. The City Council could seek property-owner approval to modify the LLAD outside the election cycle.

Based on the City Council’s determination to focus on the UUT for the November 2026 general election, the City Council authorized the Ad Hoc Subcommittee to oversee a community survey to gauge voter attitudes and support for the extension of the measure.

The statistically reliable survey was prepared by Godbe Research and TeamCivX and executed in January and February 2026. The survey asked voters to consider various durations for the UUT extension and potential increases.

DISCUSSION
Community Survey Overview
The community survey was conducted January 20 through February 7, 2026, of likely November 2026 voters in Union City, with a sample size of 468 respondents and a margin of error of ±4.48% (see Attachment 1).

Agenda Item No. 5.3
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 5 March 10, 2026
Table 1 summarizes the survey results regarding the proposal to adjust the UUT rate from 5% to 6.5% or 7.5%, with various time durations.

The measure was posed multiple times during the survey to gauge:

A. Initial uninformed support for the measure to add 2.5% to the existing 5% UUT (total 7.5%);
B. Interim support and how it fared after informational statements were read describing the purpose of the measure;
C. Final support and how it fared after critical statements were read, describing likely arguments against the measure;
D. Alternative 1 support and how it fared after a 6.5% rate was provided; E. Alternative 2 support and how it fared with a 16-year duration; F. Alternative 3 support and how it fared with an 8-year duration; and G. Alternative 4 support and how it fared at the current 5% rate with an 8-year extension was provided.

Table 1

A B C D E F G
Initial
Uninformed
(5%+2.5%)
Interim
(Informational
Statements,

7.5%)
Final
(After
Critical
Statements

7.5%)
Alt. 1
(6.5%)
Alt. 2
(16-year
duration)
Alt. 3
(8-year
duration)
Alt. 4
(5% at
8-year
duration)
Support 44.5% 50.9% 43.5% 48.8% 43.4% 46.4% 55.4%
Oppose 36.7% 37% 46.8% 41% 45% 43.6% 35.8%
Don’t
Know 18.8% 12.1% 9.7% 10.2% 11.6% 10% 8.8%
The survey results indicate that pursuing an increase at this time may be met with uncertainty, as only 50.9% support it. While this is slightly over the 50% support needed for its passage as a general tax, it is solidly within the margin of error. Further, following critical statements regarding the measure, support drops to 43.5%. The only alternative that received consistent support was Alternative 4, which was no increase in the rate and an eight-year extension.

As background, Union City voters approved a 5% UUT in November 2020 with 56.9% voter approval. The existing UUT will expire in December 2028. Waiting until the November 2028 general election would create significant financial uncertainty. To successfully extend the measure for eight years now would have the measure sunsetting in 2036.

As the City Council considers next steps, it should be mindful of future election cycles and the expiration dates of the revenue measures. As illustrated in Table 2, the general election in 2028 or 2032 could be available for consideration of other ballot measures, such as a bond measure for facilities or other possible revenue measures. By 2030, the City Council will need to be mindful of the one-half-cent sales tax, which expires in early 2034. While the City Council could wait until the general election of 2032 to consider the extension of the one-half cent sales tax, doing so will allow only one opportunity to present this measure to the voters before the expiration date of March 31, 2034.

Agenda Item No. 5.3
City Council Staff Report Page 4 of 5 March 10, 2026
Table 2
General
Elections 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036
Suggested
Renewal
UUT -
8-year
duration
½ cent
sales tax UUT
Expiration
UUT
expires
December
2028
½ cent sales
tax expires
March 2034
UUT expires
December
2036
Staff is now seeking City Council direction on whether the Council supports further exploring a possible ballot measure for November 2026. If so, staff are requesting direction on the measure's framework, including a possible rate and duration.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no immediate impact associated with the consideration of this item. The Fiscal impact on the General Fund would depend on the direction received by the City Council and the outcome of any potential ballot measure.

The City’s long-term financial forecast indicates a shortfall averaging $2.8 million from FY 2025 to FY 2035. The General Fund is projected to fall below the minimum reserve fund balance goal of 20% of its annual operating expenditures by 2029 and to be depleted by 2035 if no corrective action is taken. The financial forecast assumes no expansion of staff or City services.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive the survey results prepared by TeamCivX and Godbe Research as presented in Attachment 1 and provide direction regarding a potential ballot measure for the November 2026 election, including:

1. Whether or not to proceed with an extension to the Utility Users’ Tax; and

2. If so, provide initial direction on any adjustments to the 5% tax rate currently set, and the possible duration of the tax/sunset dates beyond December 31, 2028.

With City Council support to continue exploring a potential ballot measure, staff would begin community education and outreach to share information with residents regarding the possible extension of the Utility Users’ Tax. Staff would return to the City Council in July 2026 to consider placing a measure on the November 2026 ballot.

Agenda Item No. 5.3
City Council Staff Report Page 5 of 5 March 10, 2026
Prepared by: Joan Malloy, City Manager
Submitted by: Joan Malloy, City Manager
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – 2026 Revenue Measure Survey Results

Page 1 ends

March 10, 2026
City of Union City:
2026 Revenue Renewal Measure Survey
March 10, 2026

Page 2 ends

March 10, 2026
Overview and Research Objectives
The City of Union City commissioned Godbe Research to conduct a survey of local voters with the following research objectives:
➢ Gauge the public’s perceptions of the City’s provision services and effective management of taxpayer funds;
➢ Assess hypothetical support for a utility tax measure to maintain local control and preserve essential city services;
➢ Prioritize projects and programs to be funded with the proceeds; ➢ Test the influence of informational and critical statements on potential voter support;
➢ Identify the rate at which voters will support the measure; and ➢ Identify demographic and/or voter behavioral characteristics to ensure the sample is representative of the community.

Page 3 ends

March 10, 2026
Methodology Overview
➢ Data Collection Landline (19), cell phone (188), text to online (210), and email to online (51) interviewing
➢ Universe 21,148 Likely November 2026 Voters
➢ Fielding Dates January 20 through February 7, 2026
➢ Interview Length 25 minutes
➢ Sample Size n=468
➢ Margin of Error Likely November 2026 Voters ± 4.48%
Note: The data have been weighted by respondent age and ethnicity to reflect the November 2026 Likely Voter Universe.

Page 4 ends

March 10, 2026
Favorability Rating of the Job Union City is
Doing to Provide City Services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Likely
November
2026 Voters

24.3% 50.5% 11.4%

2.5%

11.3%
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable Very unfavorable DK/NA

74.8%

Page 5 ends

March 10, 2026
Favorability Rating of the Job Union City is
Doing to Provide City Services
Previous Survey Data
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8/19 Survey
3/20 Voters
5/20 Survey
11/20 Voters
3/22 Survey
11/22 Voters
9/23 Survey
11/24 Voters

17.4%

25.5%

23.5%

21.0%

45.5%

39.5%

41.7%

44.4%

15.7%

12.5%

17.2%

13.2%

6.3%

7.1%

6.4%

6.2%

15.1%

15.3%

11.3%

15.1%
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable Very unfavorable DK/NA

65.4%

65.2%

65.0%

62.9%

Page 6 ends

March 10, 2026
Favorability Rating of City’s Management
of Public Funds
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Likely
November
2026 Voters

10.6% 38.3% 18.2% 8.6% 24.3%
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable Very unfavorable DK/NA

48.9%

Page 7 ends

March 10, 2026
Favorability Rating of City’s Management
of Public Funds
Previous Survey Data
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8/19 Survey
3/20 Voters
5/20 Survey
11/20 Voters
3/22 Survey
11/22 Voters
9/23 Survey
11/24 Voters

9.8%

12.6%

14.5%

11.8%

35.1%

32.2%

32.3%

37.6%

20.1%

17.4%

21.1%

18.5%

14.5%

13.7%

9.4%

10.7%

20.5%

24.1%

22.6%

21.4%
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable Very unfavorable DK/NA

49.4%

46.8%

44.8%

44.9%

Page 8 ends

March 10, 2026
Initial Hypothetical Support for a Utility Tax
Measure
Shall the measure to protect
essential city services such as:
• 9-1-1 emergency/ paramedic
response;
• fixing potholes/ repairing streets;
• fire protection;
• neighborhood police patrols;
• maintaining parks;
• senior/ youth programs; and
• other city services,
by renewing the expiring City of
Union City’s utility users tax at the
current 5% rate, adding 2.5%, for
gas, electricity, video,
telecommunications services, until
ended by voters, providing
$9,750,000 annually in locallycontrolled funding, requiring citizen oversight/ independent
audits, be adopted?
Probably No

13.3%
DK/NA

18.8%
Definitely No

23.4%
Definitely Yes

18.1%
Probably Yes

26.4%
Total Support

44.5%
UUT - June 2024 Survey
Total Yes 48.6%
Total No 35.8%

Page 9 ends

March 10, 2026
Features of the Measure I
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2.

Somewhat
More Likely
Somewhat
Less Likely
Much Less
Likely
-2 -1 0 1 2
M. Maintain senior and youth programs
I. Provide updated lifesaving fire and police equipment D. Maintain neighborhood police patrols
A. Fix potholes and repair streets
K. Reduce crime and gun violence
E. Maintain fire protection services
C. Protect paramedic services
B. Maintain rapid 911 emergency response

0.81 0.84

0.86 0.87

0.89 0.92

0.95 0.99
Much More
Likely

72.1%

69.3%
No Effect
Tier 1

Page 10 ends

March 10, 2026
Features of the Measure II
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2.

Somewhat
More Likely
Somewhat
Less Likely
Much Less
Likely
-2 -1 0 1 2
O. Fund special community events
J. Address the impacts of homelessness in Union City
N. Maintain parks
G. Protect community-based policing
P. Provide mental health programs and support to help
families and youth
F. Maintain emergency and disaster preparedness
programs
L. Keep neighborhoods clean and reduce illegal dumping
H. Maintain recreation programs including the Sports
Center, Kids Camps, and after-school recreational…

0.27 0.59

0.60 0.66

0.74 0.78

0.78 0.80
Much More
Likely

68.9%

48.5%
No Effect
T1- Cont’d Tier 2

67.4%

60.1%
Tier 3

Page 11 ends

March 10, 2026
Informational Statements I
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. 0 1 2
E. This measure requires public disclosure of the spending of every penny from this measure
M. At certain times, Union City only has four on-duty police officers to serve our city of nearly 70,000 residents. This measure will help ensure Union City has enough officers patrolling our neighborhoods to keep us safe
G. Large businesses will pay their fair share, so
homeowners don't shoulder the entire cost of keeping
Union City safe
L. In the event of a heart attack, stroke, medical emergency or accident, seconds can be the difference between life and death. This measure will help ensure a first responder is able to respond quickly to 9-1-1 emergencies

1.16 1.18

1.22 1.29

75.3%

66.5%
Tier 1
Somewhat
More Likely
Much More
Likely
No Effect

Page 12 ends

March 10, 2026
Informational Statements II
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. 0 1 2
H. The measure will continue to give Union City local
control over local funds for local needs. No funds can be taken by Sacramento
A. Dedicated local funding for public safety in Union City was eliminated during the pandemic which resulted in cuts to 9-1-1 emergency response, paramedic, fire and police services
F. The measure requires an independent citizens' oversight committee, financial audits, and yearly reports to the
community to ensure that all funds are spent as promised K. The Union City Police Department has the lowest police funding per capita when compared to similar sized Bay
Area cities. This measure will protect funding for the Union City Police Department

1.04 1.07

1.08 1.14 72.3%

61.5%
Tier 1- Cont’d Tier 2

62.7%
Somewhat
More Likely
Much More
Likely
No Effect

Page 13 ends

March 10, 2026
Informational Statements III
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. 0 1 2
I. Union City has made the tough choices needed to tighten their belt and balance the budget, including cutting
administration and reducing the number of employees.

B. The measure will maintain services and programs for atrisk youth and families to help keep them on the right track and succeed
O. You never know when an accident, disaster or medical emergency will occur. This measure will ensure rapid 9-1-1 emergency services are ready when you need them the
most
D. This measure will help ensure the Union City Police
Department can investigate and prosecute violent and nonviolent criminals

0.94 0.95

1.03 1.03

68.1%

60.3%
Tier 2- Cont’d
Somewhat
More Likely
Much More
Likely
No Effect

Page 14 ends

March 10, 2026
Informational Statements VI
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. 0 1 2
J. The measure requires equal treatment of taxpayers
regardless of the telecommunications or video technology used
N. The cost of providing quality public safety services in the Bay Area is increasing and this measure will maintain local funding for public safety services to keep Union City safe
C. This measure will maintain traffic enforcement to keep drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists and children traveling to school safe
P. This measure will maintain police patrols and keep our neighborhoods safe

0.81 0.86

0.92 0.93

62.6%
Tier 2- Cont;d Tier 3

59.8%
Somewhat
More Likely
Much More
Likely
No Effect

59.7%

52.8%

Page 15 ends

March 10, 2026
Interim Hypothetical Support for a Utility Tax
Measure
Probably No

15.6%
DK/NA

12.1%
Definitely No

21.4%
Definitely Yes

20.8%
Probably Yes

30.1%
Total Support

50.9%
Shall the measure to protect
essential city services such as:
• 9-1-1 emergency/ paramedic
response;
• fixing potholes/ repairing streets;
• fire protection;
• neighborhood police patrols;
• maintaining parks;
• senior/ youth programs; and
• other city services,
by renewing the expiring City of
Union City’s utility users tax at the
current 5% rate, adding 2.5%, for
gas, electricity, video,
telecommunications services, until
ended by voters, providing
$9,750,000 annually in locallycontrolled funding, requiring citizen oversight/ independent
audits, be adopted?

Page 16 ends

March 10, 2026
Critical Statements I
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. 0 1 2
D. Union City's taxes are at a higher rate than all our neighboring cities
A. With residents and businesses struggling with the
increasing cost of living, inflation, tariffs, high gas prices, increasing grocery prices, high mortgages, now is not the time for another tax increase
F. The measure will increase the average homeowner's
utility bills by hundreds of dollars a year
H. The measure increases taxes by 50% and continues to
increase as utility costs spiral upward

1.17 1.18

1.23 1.30

71.0%
Tier 1

67.2%
Somewhat
More Likely
Much More
Likely
No Effect

Page 17 ends

March 10, 2026
Critical Statements II
Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores:
“Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. 0 1 2
C. Firefighters and police officers are already overpaid and receive lavish benefits. Why should we pay more to
support inflated salaries and benefits?
G. The City has passed a never-ending list of taxes, but they have not fixed the streets, sidewalks, and parks. We can't trust them to spend this money any better than what they already take
E. The City imposed a utility tax in 2020, a sales tax in 2022 and a business tax in 2024. This year there will be other county and regional tax proposals. Now Union City wants another tax on top of that. They need to get the City's financial house...

B. The measure is a forever tax that will never end

0.87 1.05

1.16 1.16

62.3%
Tier 1- Cont’d Tier 2

48.1%
Somewhat
More Likely
Much More
Likely
No Effect

63.5%

66.8%

Page 18 ends

March 10, 2026
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Likely
November
2026
Voter
Final Test
Likely
November
2026
Voter
Interim
Test
Likely
November
2026
Voter
Initial Test

16.6%

20.8%

18.1%

26.9%

30.1%

26.4%

24.2%

15.6%

13.3%

22.6%

21.4%

23.4%

9.7%

12.1%

18.8%
Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA Final Hypothetical Support for a Utility Tax
Measure

44.5%

43.5%

50.9%
Shall the measure to protect
essential city services such as:
• 9-1-1 emergency/ paramedic
response;
• fixing potholes/ repairing streets;
• fire protection;
• neighborhood police patrols;
• maintaining parks;
• senior/ youth programs; and
• other city services,
by renewing the expiring City of
Union City’s utility users tax at the
current 5% rate, adding 2.5%, for
gas, electricity, video,
telecommunications services, until
ended by voters, providing
$9,750,000 annually in locallycontrolled funding, requiring citizen oversight/ independent
audits, be adopted?

Page 19 ends

March 10, 2026
Hypothetical Support for Alternative Measure

1.5% Increase
Probably No

18.5%
DK/NA

10.2%
Definitely No

22.5%
Definitely Yes

22.4%
Probably Yes

26.5%
Total Support

48.8%
Instead of increasing the utility tax
by 2.5 percent, to protect essential
city services such as:
• 9-1-1 emergency and paramedic
response;
• fixing potholes and repairing
streets;
• fire protection;
• neighborhood police patrols;
• maintaining parks; and
• senior and youth programs,
another alternative would be to
increase the rate by 1.5 percent.

Page 20 ends

March 10, 2026
Hypothetical Support for Alternative Measure
16 Years
Probably No

22.9%
DK/NA

11.6%
Definitely No

22.1%
Definitely Yes

19.6%
Probably Yes

23.8%
Total Support

43.4%
Instead of levying the utility tax
until ended by voters, to protect
essential city services such as:
• 9-1-1 emergency and paramedic
response;
• fixing potholes and repairing
streets;
• fire protection;
• neighborhood police patrols;
• maintaining parks; and
• senior and youth programs,
another alternative would be to
levy the utility tax for 16 years.

Page 21 ends

March 10, 2026
Hypothetical Support for Alternative Measure
8 Years
Probably No

21.8%
DK/NA

10.0%
Definitely No

21.8%
Definitely Yes

23.2%
Probably Yes

23.3%
Total Support

46.4%
Instead of levying the utility tax for
16 years, to protect essential city
services such as:
• 9-1-1 emergency and paramedic
response;
• fixing potholes and repairing
streets;
• fire protection;
• neighborhood police patrols;
• maintaining parks; and
• senior and youth programs,
another alternative would be to
levy the utility tax for 8 years.

Page 22 ends

March 10, 2026
Hypothetical Support for Alternative Measure
Current Rate with No Increase For 8 Years
Probably No

16.4%
DK/NA

8.8%
Definitely No

19.4%
Definitely Yes

30.6%
Probably Yes

24.8%
Total Support

55.4%
Another alternative would be to
renew the tax at the current rate
without any increase for just 8
years in order to protect essential
city services such as:
• 9-1-1 emergency and paramedic
response;
• fixing potholes and repairing
streets;
• fire protection;
• neighborhood police patrols;
• maintaining parks; and
• senior and youth programs.

Page 23 ends

March 10, 2026
Forecast on Future Economy
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
5/20 Survey
11/20 Voters
3/22 Survey
11/22 Voters
9/23 Survey
11/24 Voters
2/26 Survey
11/26 Voters

33.8%

25.0%

22.8%

13.7%

20.1%

29.3%

36.7%

29.5%

34.9%

36.2%

24.7%

48.4%

11.3%

9.5%

15.7%

8.5%
Better About the same Worse DK/NA
UUT Renewal Planning Timeline
Voter Survey
Election Timing
Tax Rate/Duration
Funding Priorities
Political Landscape
Non-advocacy
Communications
Stakeholder Outreach
Tracking Research
Resolution
Ballot Question
Feasibility Assessment Awareness Building Measure Development August 7 Qualification
Deadline for Nov 2026
General Election

← All documents from this meeting