November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 5
Resolution No. _____ page ___ of ___
Attachment B
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
1. Agency City of Union City
2. Primary Contact Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
3. Mailing Address 34009 Alvarado-Niles Rd., Union City, CA 94587
4. Email Address [email protected] 5. Phone Number (510)675-5306
6. Secondary Contact (in
the event primary is
not available)
Trieu Tran, CE III
7. Mailing address (if
different) N/A☐
8. Email Address [email protected] 9. Phone Number (510)675-5301
10. Send allocation
instructions to (if
different from above):
Trieu Tran, Project Engineer
11. Project Title Arizona Street Bicycle Boulevard Project
12. Amount requested $155,475 13. Fiscal Year of
Claim
2026-2027
14. Description of Overall Project:
15. Project Scope Proposed for Funding: (Project level environmental, preliminary planning, and ROW are ineligible uses of TDA funds.)
Union City through the adoption of its Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan in 2021 identified Arizona Street as a potential corridor for implementation of a bicycle boulevard. The project was officially put into Public Works’ 5-year Capital Improvement Plan for 2025-2029 and was prioritized due to the requirements of a parallel project funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission starting in 2025. The Arizona Street Bicycle Boulevard Project became a requirement through MTC’s complete streets checklist and would become an alternate parallel route for all ages and abilities. The project will convert conventional 2-way local collector running from Royal Ann Dr. to Hop Ranch Rd. into a roadway with Class 2 bike lanes with striping improvements to improve overall safety. These additional improvements include: centerline striping, pedestrian high visibility crosswalks, pavement resurfacing, and wayfinding signage.
Additional TDA 3 funding will be used towards total construction but also expansion of project scope to include much needed improvements on adjacent route connections for pedestrians and cyclists.
Construction for implementation of roadway striping, multi-use path surface, wayfinding signage, and ped & bicycle safety improvements in addition to roadway resurfacing.
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 6
16. Project Location: A map of the project location is attached or a link to a online map of the project location is provided below:
Project Relation to Regional Policies (for information only)
17. Is the project in an Equity Priority Community? Yes☐ No☒
18. Is this project in a Priority Development Area or a Transit-Oriented Community? Yes☐ No☒
19. Project Budget and Schedule
Project
Phase
TDA 3 Other Funds Total Cost
Estimated Completion
(month/year)
Bike/Ped
Plan
10,000
ENV
PA&ED
PS&E 75,000 6/30/2026
ROW
CON 155,475 485,000 640,475 10/30/2026
Total Cost 155,475 570,000 725,475
Arizona St. between Hop Ranch and Royal Ann with Alameda Creek Trail leading to Almaden Blvd.
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 7
Project Eligibility
A. Has the project been reviewed by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee? Yes☒ No☐ If “YES,” identify the date and provide a copy or link to the agenda.
If "NO," provide an explanation).
B. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? Yes☒ No☐ If "NO," provide expected date:__________________
C. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? Yes☐ No☒ (If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page)
D. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria Yes☒ No☐ pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual? E. 1. Is the project categorically exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CCR Section 15301(c), Yes☒ No☐ Existing Facility?
2. If “NO” above, is the project is exempt from CEQA for another reason? Yes☐ No☐ Cite the basis for the exemption. __________________________ N/A☒ If the project is not exempt, please check “NO,” and provide environmental documentation, as appropriate.
F. Estimated Completion Date of project (month and year): August 2026 G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has Yes☒ No☐ the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility, please identify below and provide the agreement.
H. Is a Complete Streets Checklist required for this project ? Yes☒ No☐ If the amount requested is over $250,000 or if the total project phase or construction phase is over $250,000, a Complete Streets checklist is likely required. Please attach the Complete Streets checklist or record of review, as applicable. More information and the form may be found here: https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/complete-streets