Powered by ZoomGrants™ and
Email This Preview Save as PDF Print Close Window A▲▼
Alameda County Transportation Commission
2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan
Deadline: 8/19/2026
City of Union City
Union City Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan Update
Jump to: Application Questions Upload Attachments
$ 125,000.00 Requested
Submitted: 8/19/2026 2:17:57 PM
(Pacific)
Project Contact
Trieu Tran
[email protected]
Tel: 5106755301
Additional Contacts
none entered
City of Union City
34009 Alvarado-Niles Rd.
Union City, CA 94587
United States
Engineer III
Trieu Tran
[email protected]
Telephone5106755300
Fax
Web
Application Questions top
Section 1 - General Project Information
1. Lead/Implementing Agency
City of Union City
2. Project Category
Select all of the 2028 CIP eligible project categories that apply. For other project types, prior to continuing with the application, contact Alameda CTC staff to determine project eligibility.
Some answers will not be presented because they are not part of the selected group of questions based on the answer to #31.
Bicycle Capital Project
Pedestrian Capital Project
Transit-related Capital Project
Technology Capital Project
Shuttle/Other Program Operations
Plan (e.g., Local Roadway Safety Plans, Vision Zero planning, local planning for Transit-Oriented
3. What priority for funding does the sponsor assign to this project? Select one.
4. Brief Project Description
Limit to 255 characters.
The City adopted its current Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan in 2021. An update is needed to maintain an effective local active transportation planning framework that is consistent with MTC's policies and timeline for regular updating.
5. Brief Project Location and Limits
For capital projects, include the city/cities or other area(s) the project is located and the limits for each project street. For shuttle and program operations, identify the service area. Upload the Project map in the Attachment tab.
Citywide
6. Expanded Project Description / Detailed Scope
Include complete scope details such as the specific improvements, components, location, limits, segments, lengths, quantities, days of operation, frequency, etc.
The City of Union City proposes to update its 2021 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to create an integrated, current framework for active and multimodal transportation. The update will begin with a comprehensive audit of the 2021 plan, documenting accomplishments, completed and funded projects, programs implemented, and progress toward the plan's goals. Remaining recommendations will be reanalyzed against current conditions, safety data, community needs, development patterns, regional priorities, and available funding to determine which projects and strategies should be carried forward, modified, reprioritized, or removed.
The update will build upon the City's existing bicycle and pedestrian recommendations while integrating relevant findings and priorities from the Local Roadway Safety Plan, Short Range Transit Plan, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, General Plan, and other related planning efforts. This integrated approach will identify opportunities to improve connectivity between neighborhoods, schools, parks, employment centers, transit, BART, trails, and other major destinations.
The project will evaluate current conditions, safety, accessibility, network connectivity, first- and last-mile connections, and opportunities to improve walking, bicycling, rolling, and transit use throughout Union City.
The planning process will also explore the City's evolving transit priorities, including opportunities for transit-supportive roadway improvements, transit access, pedestrian and bicycle connections to transit, and potential transit-priority strategies.
The updated plan will establish coordinated multimodal priorities, identify and prioritize near-, mid-, and long-term projects, and provide an implementation and funding strategy that positions the City to pursue local, regional, state, and federal transportation funding. The plan will incorporate community and stakeholder engagement and align with current regional Complete Streets, active transportation, safety, equity, accessibility, and transit-priority objectives.
The resulting plan will serve as a consolidated, actionable roadmap for Union City's future bicycle, pedestrian, transit-access, and multimodal transportation investments while providing a clear accounting of progress since adoption of the 2021 plan.
7. Planning Area(s)
Select all that apply.
Communities (TOCs), Community-Based Transportation Plans (CBTPs)) 1 of total submitted applications
2 of total submitted applications
3 of total submitted applications
4 of total submitted applications
North
Central
East
South
8. Enter project's geographic coordinates (latitude, longitude).
Example: 15°24'15"N, 30°10'3"E
37°35'15.7"N 122°01'35.9"W
9. Is the Project located within, or does it provide benefits to, any of the following priority areas? Select all that apply.
See the Resources tab for the maps, and upload applicable maps highlighting the Project location in the Attachments tab.
10. If selected “Other disadvantaged or underserved community that is not an EPC” and/or “Other locally identified safety priority corridor,” explain how the community and/or corridor is defined and the factor(s) considered. Include references to any applicable local designations and/or reference documents, e.g. a local equity analysis or HIN.
In the Attachments tab, provide supporting documentation by uploading links to or relevant pages from the identified local reference documents.
Union City's Local Roadway Safety Plan identifies several corridors in the City as part of the High Injury Network. There is an actual ranking 1 through 10 but all of major regional corridors, the principal arterials are in the top 5. City would also like to highlight that there are no equity priority areas in the city, however there are several pockets that would nearly meet the criteria. City has a significant populations of under served and/or under represented. Studies indicate heightened risks and fatality burdens for pedestrians and cyclists, frequently linked to built environments in dense or under resourced neighborhoods.
11. If selected “Countywide Bikeways Network (CBN),” list the CBN network corridor(s) and segment(s) the Project improves and whether the Project is directly on the named corridor street/route or on a parallel route. If the Project is on a parallel route, explain if and how the Project fulfills each of the selection criteria for the named corridor street.
See the Resources tab for a link to the draft CBN progress map from the Countywide Active Transportation Plan and Selection Criteria with more detailed instructions.
Plan is citywide and contains several corridors on the CBN. Union City Blvd. Alvarado-Niles Rd., Decoto Rd., Whipple Rd., Dyer St., Alvarado Blvd.
12. What is the Project’s 2026 Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) ID Number? Enter the Project's ID number from the applicable CTP project list.
N/A
13. If this Project was awarded Alameda CTC-administered funds through a prior CIP cycle, provide the CIP ID number.
See the Resources tab for a link to the List of Currently Programmed Projects with the CIP ID numbers, as identified in the 2026 CIP Update, approved in May 2026.
N/A
Countywide
MTC-defined Equity Priority Community (EPC)
Other disadvantaged or underserved community that is not an EPC Alameda CTC Active Transportation High-Injury Network (HIN) Alameda CTC Proactive Safety Network (PSN)
Other locally identified safety priority corridor
Countywide Bikeways Network (CBN)
Three Major Trails (Bay Trail, Iron Horse Trail and East Bay Greenway) Priority Development Area (PDA)
Priority Production Area (PPA)
Transit-Oriented Community (TOC)
Section 2 - Project Need/Benefit and Countywide Priority
14. Describe how the Project addresses identified transportation issues and needs. Reference local plans, studies and/or needs assessments that identify and justify the Project's local priority and need. If available and applicable, provide specific reference to a Community Based Transportation Plan (CBTP), Participatory Budgeting, or comparable community-driven planning and project prioritization effort; and demonstrate consistency with one or more of the following regional plans and policies: Plan Bay Area 2050+, Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan, Regional Safety/Vision Zero Policy, or Equity Platform.
See the Resources tab for Countywide Priorities and CARE resources sections for links to applicable plan documents. In the Attachments tab, provide supporting documentation by uploading links or relevant pages from the identified local plans/studies.
The plan addresses the need for an updated, coordinated framework for Union City's bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and multimodal transportation investments. The City's 2021 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan provides the existing foundation, and the update will audit accomplishments and outstanding recommendations and reanalyze remaining needs based on current conditions, safety data, community needs, and funding opportunities. The Project will integrate the City's Local Roadway Safety Plan, Short Range Transit Plan, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and other relevant planning efforts; evaluate transit priorities, first- and last-mile connections, network gaps, accessibility, and safety; and align local priorities with Alameda CTC's Countywide Bikeways Network and All Ages and Abilities policy and the 2026 Countywide Active Transportation Plan. The update will also incorporate Alameda County Health priorities related to health equity, the built environment, and access to healthy communities, while considering applicable federal, state, and regional underserved and disadvantaged-community indicators. The resulting prioritized project list and implementation strategy will support Plan Bay Area 2050+, the Regional Safety/Vision Zero framework, the regional Equity Platform, and Alameda County's goals for a connected, safe, accessible, and equitable multimodal transportation system.
15. For projects that impact roadways, describe how the Project will advance the 2026 CTP Goal: Safety. Describe existing safety issues (e.g., crash history, high vehicle volumes or speeds, presence of vulnerable users) and indicate if the project is on the Alameda CTC Active Transportation HIN, PSN, or other locally identified safety priority corridor.
Use Question 16 to expand upon project design elements that respond to existing safety concerns.
The plan will advance the 2026 Countywide Transportation Plan Goal of Safety by updating Union City's bicycle and pedestrian safety priorities using current crash data, roadway conditions, and recommendations from the City's Local Roadway Safety Plan. The update will evaluate locations and corridors with documented bicycle and pedestrian collisions, high vehicle speeds or volumes, gaps in pedestrian and bicycle facilities, challenging crossings, and other conditions that create risks for vulnerable road users. The analysis will incorporate Alameda CTC's Active Transportation High Injury Network (HIN), Priority Safety Network (PSN), and other locally identified safety priority corridors, as applicable, to ensure that the City's future bicycle, pedestrian, and multimodal investments address documented safety needs. The resulting prioritized project list will provide a data-driven framework for advancing proven safety improvements, improving conditions for people walking and bicycling, and supporting the Countywide goal of eliminating traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries.
16. For projects that impact roadways, specify project design elements consistent with the CTP Goal Alignment Rubric that address safety issues specified in Question 15 (e.g., reducing or narrowing travel lanes, decreasing turn radii, RRFBs, daylighting, protected signal phasing, etc.).
See the Resource tab for links to references, including Alameda CTC 2026 CTP Goal Alignment Rubric, FHWA’s Proven Safety Countermeasures, MTC’s Vision Zero Action Plan, and Alameda CTC’s Countywide Bikeways Design Guide.
The plan will directly integrate and cite Union City's Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) as a foundational safety resource for the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Multimodal Transportation Plan Update. The update will incorporate the LRSP's identified High Injury Network (HIN), documented safety issues, crash patterns, and recommended countermeasures into the evaluation and prioritization of bicycle, pedestrian, and multimodal improvements. The project will assess the status of LRSP recommendations and identify opportunities to coordinate bicycle and pedestrian projects with identified roadway safety countermeasures, particularly along HIN corridors and at high-injury locations. This approach will ensure that the updated plan builds upon the City's established safety analysis and provides a coordinated framework for advancing LRSP recommendations through future transportation investments.
17. Describe how the Project will advance the 2026 CTP Goal: Equity. Include benefits for MTCdefined EPCs or other disadvantaged/underserved communities (e.g. by improving safety, increasing access, reducing emissions, maintaining a state of good repair, or reducing environmental burdens).
See the Resources Tab for links to Alameda CTC 2026 CTP Goal Alignment Rubric, CTP Equity Area Maps, Chapter 7 of the Alameda County CBTP, and CARE resources.
The plan will advance the 2026 CTP Goal of Equity by evaluating transportation needs and investment priorities in MTC-defined Equity Priority Communities (EPCs) and other underserved areas within Union City. The update will assess gaps in safe and accessible bicycle, pedestrian, and transit connections; access to jobs, schools, parks, services, and regional transit; and barriers affecting residents with limited transportation options. Union City's transit system serves many of these same populations, including residents who may have limited access to private vehicles, and the update will evaluate opportunities to strengthen connections between transit and the City's walking and bicycling networks. The analysis will incorporate MTC's EPC framework and other applicable federal and state disadvantaged-community indicators, with equity considerations informing community engagement, needs assessment, project prioritization, and identification of investments that improve safety, access, mobility, and connectivity for underserved residents.
18. Describe the community engagement completed to date for the Project for the 2026 CTP Goal: Equity, including how any equitable engagement best practices have been applied, and how community input has been reflected in the Project scope and design. If community input has not been solicited or incorporated, explain why, and describe plans for any future community engagement.
See the Resources tab for engagement best practices, as well as MTC's CARE resources and Guidelines, which specify the minimum documentation requirements for CARE-eligible projects. In the Attachments tab, provide a summary of completed engagement.
The City plans to conduct community outreach and a public survey as part of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Multimodal Transportation Plan Update to better understand current residents' transportation needs, priorities, and preferences. Engagement will build upon community input received through the 2021 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and subsequent City planning efforts, including the Local Roadway Safety Plan, Short Range Transit Plan, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and BPAC. The outreach will seek input from residents who walk, bicycle, use transit, and have limited access to private vehicles, with particular attention to Equity Priority Communities and other underserved areas. Survey and outreach results will inform the evaluation of the 2021 plan, identification of current needs and gaps, project prioritization, transit priorities, and the updated implementation strategy.
19. Describe how the Project will advance the 2026 CTP Goal: Climate. Specify project elements consistent with the 2026 CTP Goal Alignment Rubric that support transit (e.g. transit priority infrastructure or access to transit), reduce congestion through operational tools, eliminate or mitigate major barriers, incorporate climate-adaptive and resilient elements, advance clean initiatives supporting Zero-Emission Vehicle efforts, or respond to impacts from sea-level rise.
See the Resources tab for links to Alameda CTC 2026 CTP Goal Alignment Rubric, MTC Transit Priority Policy for Roadways, AC Transit Design Guide, and CBN.
The plan will advance the 2026 CTP Goal of Climate by identifying and prioritizing bicycle, pedestrian, and transit-supportive improvements that provide alternatives to automobile travel and improve access to Union City's transit system. With a regional Transit Priority Network identified, the updated plan can focus planning and investment efforts on the specific bicycle, pedestrian, roadway, and first- and last-mile needs that support transit priority corridors. The plan will evaluate access to transit stops and regional transit, multimodal network gaps, and barriers to walking, bicycling, rolling, and transit use, while identifying opportunities to coordinate transportation investments with the City's transit priorities. By establishing a coordinated and prioritized multimodal investment strategy, the Project will support mode shift, reduce vehicle travel and transportation-related emissions, and advance regional climate goals.
20. If the Project is located on the CBN or provides direct benefit to it, describe how the Project meets the requirements of Alameda CTC’s All Ages and Abilities (AAA) Policy and each of the CBN Design Expectations. For non-bicycle projects (e.g. pedestrian, transit, or technology) that are located on the CBN, explain the Project's impact on existing or future bicycle facilities, if any.
See the Resources tab for Alameda CTC CBN Map, AAA Policy, and Design Expectations.
The Project will support Alameda CTC's Countywide Bikeways Network (CBN) and All Ages and Abilities (AAA) Policy while recognizing Union City's context as a suburban community. The City uses Caltrans DIB 89, Contextual Design for State Highway Systems, as a reference for developing context-sensitive multimodal solutions. In constrained corridors, transit priority treatments and AAA bicycle facilities may compete for limited roadway space; the update will specifically evaluate these conditions and identify context-sensitive solutions that balance transit reliability and priority with bicycle safety, comfort, accessibility, and network continuity. The plan will assess gaps and barriers on and connecting to CBN corridors and develop practical design approaches appropriate to Union City's suburban context, while maintaining consistency with Alameda CTC's AAA Policy and CBN Design Expectations. This approach will help the City coordinate transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and roadway investments and address multimodal conflicts through context-sensitive design rather than applying a uniform treatment to every corridor.
21. Describe how the Project will advance the 2026 CTP Goal: Economic Vitality. Specify project elements consistent with the 2026 CTP Goal Alignment Rubric that connect jobs and transit, support development near transit, or how the Project will provide congestion relief through multimodal travel options. Also, for projects located in or benefiting central business districts, major employment/activity centers, and/or any applicable priority areas, such as PCA, PDA, PPA, or TOCs, describe how the Project directly benefits the applicable geographies.
See the Resource tab for links to the Alameda CTC 2026 CTP Goal Alignment Rubric, and applicable priority area maps.
The City has observed increased use of e-bikes and e-scooters, including increased ridership to and from local schools. While the extent to which these modes are being used for commercial trips requires further study, the observed growth in active transportation presents a positive opportunity for local commerce by making nearby businesses and services more convenient to access without a vehicle. The plan update will further evaluate these emerging travel patterns and identify opportunities to strengthen connections between neighborhoods, schools, transit, commercial areas, employment centers, and other community destinations.
Section 3 - Project Readiness
22. Describe the level of demand/support from the local community, stakeholders, and partnering agencies, and for each, describe the level of involvement in the Project. Explain the Project’s impact on existing transit service and/or other modes, as well as coordination efforts with impacted agencies.
In the Attachments tab, upload a list of key project partners and documentation of community, partner agency and other stakeholder support. Letters of support are encouraged, ideally a minimum of three letters, including one from a CBO.
Although substantial work remains to be implemented from the 2021 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Union City's BPAC recognizes that an update is warranted to reflect the post-COVID transportation environment. While some pre-pandemic travel patterns have returned, they have not necessarily returned in the same form, with emerging technologies such as e-bikes and e-scooters, evolving bicycle and pedestrian design practices, changing transit conditions, and new local, regional, state, and federal policies influencing how residents travel. The City has not yet initiated formal community engagement for the plan update; however, the proposed project will include a public outreach process and survey to understand current resident needs, preferences, and travel behaviors. The update will evaluate progress and remaining needs from the 2021 plan while reassessing current transportation trends and priorities to ensure future investments reflect existing conditions and emerging opportunities.
23. How much 2028 CIP funding is requested for which project phase(s)? Fill in all that apply.
The total request amount should match the amount in the Summary tab and the Budget/Funding table (of the separate Excel file to be uploaded in the Attachments tab).
Enter the amount to the nearest dollar, but after rounding to the nearest $1,000.
24. Is the Project entirely within the Sponsor's right-of-way? Describe any new right-of-way permits or easements required and the status of each. Also, identify any known utility relocations, conflicts, or other conditions within the project right-of-way that may require third party agreements or conflict resolution.
Yes
25. Identify any known or anticipated issues that may affect the timely delivery of the Project and how these issues will be addressed. Include any issues with the current phase that may delay the Project’s ability to advance to the 2028 CIP requested phase(s) per the schedule identified in the application.
Examples: inter-agency or community coordination and/or conflicts, lawsuits, unsecured funding, the Project's dependency upon completion of another major capital project, etc.
None
26. If a usable segment of the proposed project scope can be implemented with partial funding through project segmentation/phasing, describe how.
N/A
27. Describe how the Project fosters a State of Good Repair, including how the Project extends the useful life of an asset, replaces an asset that's beyond its useful life, or reduces operations and maintenance costs. Also, explain how the Project will be operated/maintained once completed and for how long (at a minimum). Confirm the responsible agency(s) for maintaining the improvement and whether new maintenance and/or operations agreements are required.
The updated plan will support a State of Good Repair by evaluating the condition of existing bicycle, pedestrian, and multimodal infrastructure and identifying maintenance, rehabilitation, replacement, and improvement needs as part of the City's project prioritization process. Recommendations will consider lifecycle costs and opportunities to coordinate maintenance and capital investments to extend the useful life of existing assets and reduce long-term operations and maintenance costs. Upon completion, the plan will be maintained by the City of Union City as the City's guiding bicycle, pedestrian, and multimodal transportation planning document. No new maintenance or operations agreements are anticipated as a result of the planning project.
28. For new and/or expanded programs or shuttle services, explain the phasing or steps needed to implement the new/expanded components and the timing of each.
N/A
Section 4 - Leveraging/Matching Funding
29. Does the amount of matching funding identified in the application either meet or exceed the Project Scoping
Environmental
Design/PSE
Right of Way
Construction
Shuttle Operation
Program Operation
125000 Plan
125,000.00 TOTAL
minimum match requirements? (capital: 25%; operations: 75%) The minimum match requirements vary by project type. For capital projects, the minimum match requirement of 25% is applied to each phase for which funding is requested. For operations, the 75% minimum match is applied by year.
30. For any unsecured/unprogrammed matching funding identified in the application, explain the status and timeline for securing the funding needed for a complete funding plan. If all of the identified matching funds are secured, please confirm.
For pilot operation projects/programs, describe the plan for sustaining operations beyond the initial pilot period.
City will formally identify the project plan in its next 5-year CIP plan, where funding will be identified and allocated for the project.
Section 5 - Federal OBAG 4 Funding
31. Is this application to be considered for federal OBAG 4 funding? Answering "Yes" also confirms the following: (1) Sponsor is an eligible direct recipient of federal funding; (2) Project and requested phases are eligible to be delivered with federal funding; (3) Sponsor has the knowledge and resources to successfully deliver a federally-funded project pursuant to MTC's OBAG 4 program requirements and within the established timelines, and (4) MTC's OBAG 4 application has been completed and is uploaded/submitted with this application. Answering "No" below will remove the Project from consideration for federal funding (to be evaluated only for non-federal 2028 CIP funding sources).
See the Resources tab for links to OBAG 4 resources, especially MTC Res. 4740 OBAG 4 Project Selection and Programming Policies > Project Requirements and MTC Res. 3630 Regional Project Delivery Policy.
32. Projects considered for federal funding will need to upload a printout of a Complete Streets Checklist (draft or final), indicating (1) the Project and checklist has been or will be reviewed by BPAC prior to the application deadline, and (2) the transit agency review has been or will be completed prior to the BPAC review. Projects in jurisdictions without a Local BPAC (i.e.., Dublin, Hayward, Livermore, Newark) will be scheduled for review by the Countywide BPAC in July 2026. Enter one of the following responses: (1) (Local BPAC name) review of the Project on (actual or scheduled date) or (2) (if the project area does not have a Local BPAC) County BPAC review in July 2026 requested.
-answer not presented because of the answer to #31-
33. Acknowledgement of OBAG 4 Sponsor Compliance: Per MTC Resolution 4740, recipients of MTC OBAG 4 funding must comply with the following requirements throughout the OBAG 4 program period, as applicable. (If certain items are not applicable, leave them unchecked, and proceed to Question 36.)
-answer not presented because of the answer to #31-
34. For any unchecked items, explain why the requirement is not applicable. Also, for the LRSP or equivalent safety plan, explain how Sponsor is planning on maintaining the compliance status, detailing their commitment and timeline for the next update. -answer not presented because of the answer to #31-
Section 6 - Applicant Assurances
Yes
Yes (Check here to be considered for all 2028 CIP funding sources, including the federal OBAG 4 funds)
No (Check here to be considered only for non-federal 2028 CIP funding sources)
35. If awarded Alameda CTC-administered local funding, the Applicant agrees to abide by Alameda CTC’s funding requirements outlined in the sample Project Funding Agreement, including Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) Program, procurement, logo usage, and reporting requirements.
See the Resources tab for a link to a sample agreement.
36. The Applicant has adopted a governing body resolution that confirms local support, including providing the minimum matching funding contribution, and accepts Alameda CTC’s funding requirements. For each 2028 CIP application, an adopted project-specific resolution of local support (ROLS) using the Alameda CTC’s template language is required at the time of the application submittal, unless Alameda CTC staff provided written approval in advance for a later ROLS timeline.
See the Resources tab for the required template. Upload a signed copy of the adopted ROLS in the Attachment tab. If written approval was obtained for a delayed ROLS submittal, upload a draft ROLS, and email a signed copy once available.
Yes
Yes, a copy of the adopted ROLS is attached.
No, but Alameda CTC has provided advance written approval (required) of the later timing for the ROLS adoption and/or submittal.
Upload Attachments top
Documents Requested * Required?Attached Documents *
Project Limits / Location Map: Highlight
project limits, existing & proposed facilities,
transit routes, etc. (Required for all project
types)
map
Area Map: Highlight project's proximity to
the priority areas, such as EPC or other
equity destination, HIN, PSN, CBN, Three
Major Trails, PDA, PPA, TOC, Major
Barriers, key employment / other activity
centers, etc. (Required for all project type)
TOC
PDA
PPA
HIN
Trails
CBN
Local Priority Documentation: Links to or
relevant pages from locally identified equity
priority communities or safety priority
corridors or local plans/studies that identify
the Project's priority and need
links to plan documents
List of Key Project Partners: As applicable,
list project partners identified in the
application (agency, primary role, contact
name, phone number and email)
Summary of Engagement, such as meeting
dates, locations, number of attendees,
participating organizations, input received,
project impacts, etc. (Required unless no
community input has been solicited)
Letters of Support (Required for projects to
be considered for CARE funding; optional
for others but encouraged)
LOS BPAC Kirby
LOS BPAC McDonnell
Resolution of Local Support (Required for Reso
Application ID: 525416
Become a fan of ZoomGrants™ on Facebook
Problems? Contact us at [email protected]
©2002-2026 GrantAnalyst.com. All rights reserved.
"ZoomGrants" and the ZoomGrants logo are trademarks of GrantAnalyst.com, LLC.
Logout | Browser
* ZoomGrants™ is not responsible for the content of uploaded documents. all project types)
download template
Budget, Funding, and Schedule: Download,
complete and upload the provided template.
Must complete all tabs (Budget, Funding,
and Schedule).
download template
Budget-Schedule-Funding
Capital projects: Detail Cost Estimate
(Required for a construction request)
Capital projects: If available, relevant pages
from completed project initiation/scoping
document
Capital projects: If available, conceptual or
schematic design drawings
Shuttle Route Maps and Schedules
(Required for shuttle projects)
MTC Federal OBAG 4 Funding Application
(Required for OBAG 4 candidates)
download template
MTC Complete Streets Checklist (Draft or
Final - required for OBAG 4 or CARE
candidates)
Supplemental community engagement
documentation, e.g., petitions/sign-on
letters, endorsements from
councils/committees, community
prioritization workshops, engagement
reports, etc. (May be required for CARE;
see CARE Resources in the Resources
tab)