Agenda packet, regular meeting, second session — Union City City Council, September 22, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

September 22, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 1 of 7
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

NOTICE AND AGENDA

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Vice Mayor (District 2)
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember (District 1)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, September 22, 2026 | 7:00 PM
City Hall – Tom Kitayama City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587

LIVE CAPTIONS, TRANSLATION & INTERPRETATION AVAILABLE
English Live Captions | Español | Tagalog | 中文 | Tiếng Việt Scan the QR code or visit attend.wordly.ai/join/QDRM-0110 to:
• View live English closed captions
• View translated captions
• Listen to interpretation audio
• Select your preferred language
Español: Escanee el código QR para seleccionar su idioma y acceder a subtítulos o interpretación en tiempo real.

Tagalog: I-scan ang QR code upang piliin ang inyong wika at gamitin ang live caption o interpretasyon.
中文: 扫描⼆维码选择语⾔，并获取实时字幕或⼝译服务。
Tiếng Việt: Quét mã QR để chọn ngôn ngữ và sử dụng phụ đề hoặc phiên dịch trực tiếp.

Live captions and interpretation are provided to improve accessibility and language access for meeting participants.

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1. Pledge of Allegiance

1.2. Roll Call

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
September 22, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 2 of 7
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda
Each person who wishes to speak during Oral Communications for matters not listed on the agenda will have up to three minutes, unless the Chair announces a different time limit. Public comment may be provided in person or remotely. In-person speakers are requested to submit a speaker card before the item is called. Remote speakers should use the “Raise Hand” feature when the City Clerk calls for speakers, or press *9 if participating by phone. Speaker cards are requested for meeting administration and recordkeeping purposes, but are not required to speak.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be approved together with one motion. If any item requires discussion, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and discussed separately.

3.1. Approve the September 8, 2026 City Council Special Meeting Action Minutes

3.2. Approve the September 8, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes

3.3. Waive Further Reading and Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City Amending Sections 2.21.030, 2.21.040, 2.23.020, 2.23.030,

2.24.030, 2.25.030, 2.25.040, and 2.26.020 of the Union City Municipal Code to Standardize the Annual Selection of Commission Chairs and Vice Chairs

3.4. Waive Further Reading and Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City Amending Section 2.20.100 of the Union City Municipal Code to Align Ethics Training Requirements with State Law

3.5. Adopt a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees Related to Retirement Benefits

3.6. Adopt a Resolution Amending the Budget to Appropriate $10,000 From the Union Landing Property Improvement District Fund Towards Marketing and Promotion for the Sama-Sama Fest 2026 in Union Landing

3.7. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $61,650, for a Total Contract Amount of $135,850, for the Final Parcel Map for Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04

3.8. Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Two-Year Service Contract to P31 Enterprises, Inc. for Citywide Tree Pruning and Removal, City Project No. 27-00, in a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $430,000, and Authorizing the City Manager to Exercise Up to Three One-Year Extension Options for a Five-Year Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $1,195,000

3.9. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Award of a Construction Contract to McKim Corporation, in the Amount of $641,564, Approving a Total Construction Budget, in the Amount of $769,877, and Appropriating $799,877 From Various Funds to the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38

3.10. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Gates Studio, in the Amount of $41,930, for a Total Not-to-Exceed Contract Amount of September 22, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 3 of 7
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda
$340,940, for Additional Scope of Work for the Revision and Update of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, City Project No. 24-20, and Appropriating $41,930 from the Park-In-Lieu Fund in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for Project No. 24-20

3.11. Adopt a Resolution Approving an Exchange of the Remaining Local Match Balance for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Bus Accelerated Infrastructure Delivery Grant Program, in the Amount of $41,208, from ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund to Measure BB (2014) Fund for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, and Amending the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to Reflect the Changes in Funding

3.12. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Award of a Construction Contract to Mark Lee and Yong Kay, Inc., DBA Bay Construction Company, in the Amount of $322,130, Approving a Total Construction Budget in the Amount of $370,450, and Authorizing a Budget Transfer, in the Amount of $470,450, from Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, to the Block 6 Interim Transit Facility Project, City Project No. 26-19

3.13. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Second Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kittelson & Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $325,001, for a Total Not-to-Exceed Contract Amount of $600,612, for Final Design and Right-of-Way Services for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21

3.14. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager, or Their Designee, to Submit the Required Funding Application and to Execute the Certifications, Assurances and Authorized Agent Forms for the Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure for Union City Transit Project, in the Amount of $94,882, to the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) Cycle B and to Place the Award in the Capital Facilities Improvements Fund for the Union City Transit Fleet Electrification Project, City Project No. 22-11

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings provide the City Council with an opportunity to receive staff presentations, ask questions, hear public testimony, and take action as required. Public comment may be provided in person or remotely. In-person speakers are requested to submit a speaker card before the public hearing is closed. Remote speakers should use the “Raise Hand” feature when the City Clerk calls for speakers, or press *9 if participating by phone. After the public hearing closes, additional comments may not be accepted unless the Chair reopens it.

4.1. Hold a Public Hearing and Adopt a Resolution Approving the 2025-2026 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and Authorizing the City Manager to Submit the 2025-2026 CDBG CAPER to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

5. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

5.1. Receive and File the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Overtime Usage Report September 22, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 4 of 7
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

5.2. Waive Full Reading and Introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City Amending Certain Sections of Title 8, “Animals” of the Union City Municipal Code to Update Regulations Pertaining to Vicious and Potentially Dangerous Dogs

6. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

7. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL

8. GOOD OF THE ORDER

9. CLOSED SESSION

9.1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representatives: City Attorney, Mayor Singh Unrepresented Employee: City Manager

10. ADJOURNMENT

MEETING INFORMATION
The City Council is authorized to take action only on items listed on this agenda. Public comment is welcomed and encouraged on agenda items and on matters within the City Council's subject-matter jurisdiction during the designated public comment period.

Regular City Council meetings are held in person on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587.

Meetings are broadcast live on UCTV Channel 15 and live-streamed on the City's website:
https://bit.ly/3x9mEiR.

Public Records:

Documents related to agenda items are available for review on the City's website at https://www.unioncityca.gov or during business hours at the City Clerk's Office, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587.

Accessibility and Accommodation Requests:

If you require disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (510) 675-5448 or [email protected] at least 72 hours before the meeting. The City will make reasonable efforts to accommodate requests received after that time. Closed captioning is available for regular City Council meetings.

ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
In-Person Public Comment:

Members of the public may address the City Council on any agenda item or during the Public Input portion of the meeting. Speaker cards are requested to assist with meeting administration but are not required for public comment. Providing a name, city of residence, mailing address, or other identifying information is voluntary. If you would like a follow-up from the City, please provide contact information.

September 22, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 5 of 7
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda
Written Comment:

To submit written comments on an agenda item or during Public Input, please email [email protected]. Include "Public Comment" in the subject line and reference the agenda item number, if applicable. Written comments will be forwarded to the City Council and made publicly available.

REMOTE ATTENDANCE AND PUBLIC COMMENT
City Council meetings may be observed remotely through Zoom. Beginning July 1, 2026, pursuant to Senate Bill 707 and California Government Code sections 54953.4 and 54954.3, members of the public may also provide public comment in real time either in person or remotely through the two-way audiovisual platform or two-way telephonic service identified below. Remote public commenters will receive the same time allotment as members of the public commenting in person.

Join Online: http://citycouncil-live.unioncity.org
Direct Zoom Link:
https://unioncity-org.zoom.us/j/83271719037?pwd=rrD6hA9Be9kmowKVtZxBG1khdLegtM.1 Webinar ID: 832 7171 9037
Zoom Passcode: &ejwaZ9P
Join by Telephone: +1 408 638 0968
Telephone Passcode: 06932153
Remote Public Comment:

To provide public comment remotely, use the "Raise Hand" feature on Zoom or press *9 if participating by telephone. When called upon, the speaker will be unmuted and given the allotted time to speak.

Telephone participants may press *6 to mute or unmute themselves when called to speak. Remote speakers must be present in the Zoom or telephone queue when called. Remote participants are responsible for ensuring that they are connected and able to hear the meeting.

Remote Access Disruption:

The City Council adopted the City of Union City SB 707 Meeting Disruption Policy by Resolution No. 2026-060 on May 12, 2026. If a disruption of telephonic or internet service prevents remote attendance, observation, or public comment, the City Council will follow the adopted policy. The policy may require the open session to be recessed while the City makes good-faith efforts to restore service. If service is not restored, the City Council may continue only after making the required rollcall findings, as applicable.

Technical Assistance:

Meeting staff will monitor remote access during the meeting. If you experience remote access issues during the meeting, please notify the Zoom host as soon as possible.

CITY COUNCIL NORMS AND GUIDELINES
(Resolution No. 6129-23; Adopted May 23, 2023)
The Union City Council abides by the following norms:

1. We conduct ourselves in a professional manner, treat everyone with respect, and act with high integrity, always putting the interests of the City of Union City ahead of self-interests in accordance with our code of ethics.

2. We respect the Council-Manager form of government, and do not interfere with the September 22, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 6 of 7
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda
City Manager's role or any professional duties of City staff.

3. We recognize that matters of confidential nature are to be kept private and undisclosed.

4. We respect each other's opinions and are supportive of each other's work advocating for the City, and we ensure that all voices are heard. We do not criticize others for having a different point of view, and we agree to disagree respectfully.

5. We understand that the City Council acts as a body, all members are equal, and policy direction is only given by a majority vote of the City Council. Once a decision is made, all members of the City Council must respect the City Council's direction.

6. We will be prepared for City Council meetings and ask our questions of the City Manager in advance so we can avoid surprising City staff at meetings.

7. We do not criticize City staff publicly or to others and will refrain from directing them. Instead, we will take our concerns and questions privately to the City Manager.

8. We will govern on an at-large basis, although elected by districts. We will maintain a citywide perspective and consider the needs and interests of the entire community.

9. We will continue to allocate resources based on long-term strategic priorities and efforts, with consideration of citywide service levels and financial capacity.

10. We understand customer service is the priority and each member of the City Council will help constituents regardless of the district in which they reside or from which a Councilmember themselves is elected.

11. We recognize the significant importance of attendance and participation at City Council meetings in proceeding with City business. All members of the City Council should endeavor to miss no more than two regular meetings per calendar year absent extraordinary circumstances. Members of the City Council should, absent unforeseen circumstances, provide a minimum of sixty days' notice to the City Council of planned absences during the Good of the Order or Items Referred by Council portion of the City Council agenda, as appropriate.

May these Council Norms be administered and enforced in the following manner:

1. Councilmembers have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met by the Council, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government.

2. The Mayor and the Council have the responsibility to intervene when action of its members are in violation of Council Norms.

3. The City Council can review and revise the Council Norms as needed.

4. During City Council discussions, deliberations, and proceedings, the Mayor is designated with the primary responsibility to ensure that Councilmembers adhere to the Council Norms.

CERTIFICATION OF MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA POSTING
This notice and agenda were posted on the City's website and the City Hall bulletin board at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date, in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act.

September 22, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 7 of 7
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda
/s/Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk/Secretary to the City of Union City Successor Agency City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 1 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.1
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approve the September 8, 2026 City Council Special Meeting Action Minutes

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council approve the meeting minutes.

Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Action Minutes
8 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 1 of 5 City Council
Special Meeting Minutes

MINUTES

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Vice Mayor (District 2)
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember (District 1)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, September 8, 2026 | 6:00 PM
City Hall – Tom Kitayama City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Singh called the meeting to order at 6:03 PM.

2. ROLL CALL
Attendance Attendee Name
Present Lance Nishihira, Councilmember
Scott Sakakihara, Councilmember
Jeff Wang, Councilmember (via teleconference)
Jaime Patiño, Vice Mayor
Gary Singh, Mayor
Absent None
Councilmember Wang participated via teleconference from Dallas Marriott Downtown, 650 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(b).

He confirmed his location and that no members of the public were present there.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - Comments Limited to Items on the Special Meeting Agenda
Mayor Singh opened Oral Communications. City Clerk Pham reported that no speaker cards had been submitted and no hands were raised online. There being no speakers, Mayor Singh closed Oral Communications.
9 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 2 of 5 City Council
Special Meeting Minutes

4. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

4.1. Proclamation Recognizing September 2026 as National Transit Month Mayor Singh presented the proclamation to Transit Manager Steve Adams and Transit Analyst Maryam Farhangfar on behalf of Union City Transit. Mr. Adams made brief remarks.

4.2. Proclamation Recognizing September 2026 as Hunger Action Month Mayor Singh presented the proclamation to Linda Leu, Executive Director of TCV Food Bank; Susana Peinado, Executive Director of Centro de Servicios; Chitra Chandrasekaran, Operations Manager of Daily Bowl; and Jonathan Pettey, TCV Food Bank Board Member. Ms. Leu made brief remarks.

4.3. Proclamation Recognizing the Daily Bowl 10th Anniversary Mayor Singh presented the proclamation to Daily Bowl, which was accepted by cofounder Councilmember Nishihira. Councilmember Nishihira made brief remarks.

4.4. Proclamation Recognizing September 15, 2026 – October 15, 2026 as Hispanic Heritage Month
Mayor Singh presented the proclamation to Larry Orozco. Mr. Orozco made brief remarks.

4.5. Presentation on the 2026 Fourth of July After-Action Report Police Captain Sergio Quintero presented the report. There were no Council questions or public speakers.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Singh pulled Items 5.15 and 5.16 and disclosed an economic conflict of interest because MV Transportation, Inc., the operator of Union City Transit, leased real property from him and was a source of income for him. He stated that he would recuse himself from those items.

Motion: Approve Consent Calendar Items 5.1 through 5.14.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Councilmember Nishihira
SECONDER: Vice Mayor Patiño
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

5.1. Approve the July 28, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes Approved as part of the Consent Calendar.

5.2. Approve the August 31, 2026 City Council Special Closed Session Meeting Action Minutes
Approved as part of the Consent Calendar.
10 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 3 of 5 City Council
Special Meeting Minutes

5.3. Adopt a Resolution Establishing the 2027 Calendar Year City Council Regular Meeting Schedule
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-128

5.4. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Mayor’s Appointment of Christine Liu to the Economic Development Advisory Team Effective September 8, 2026, and Appointments to the Park and Recreation Commission and Senior Citizens Commission Effective January 1, 2027
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-129

5.5. Adopt a Resolution Ratifying $63,927 of Work Previously Completed by Price Paige & Company and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Price Paige & Company, in the Additional Amount of $100,000, for a Total Not-to-Exceed Contract Amount of $174,000, for Additional Professional Accounting Services
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-130

5.6. Adopt a Resolution Establishing Authority to Open and Maintain Accounts, Establishing Signature Authority, and Establishing Authorization to Transfer Funds Using Online Banking Services For the City’s Accounts at Fremont Bank
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-131

5.7. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Establishment of the Classification of Maintenance III - Parks and Grounds, Approving a Side Letter, and Updating the Classification and Compensation Plan to Include the Classification of Maintenance III - Parks and Grounds
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-132

5.8. Adopt a Resolution Approving the First Amendment with Global Office, Inc. for the Scanning, Indexing, and Destruction of Archive Documents at the Corporation Yard
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-133

5.9. Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Bauer Compressors, Inc., in the Amount of $105,000, for the Purchase of One Replacement Breathing Air Compressor for Fire Station 32 and Approving a Budget Amendment Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-134
11 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 4 of 5 City Council
Special Meeting Minutes

5.10. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Seventh Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Consor North America, Inc., in the Amount of $300,000, for a Not-to-Exceed Total Amount of $824,000, for Inspection Services
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-135

5.11. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Sixth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Cumming Group, in the Amount of $345,000, for a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $1,005,830, for Construction Project Management Services for Various City-Owned Building Repairs and Renovations Projects
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-136

5.12. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Fourth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group, in the Amount of $40,000, for a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $186,950, for On-Call Traffic Signal System Support
Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-137

5.13. Adopt a Resolution Appropriating $120,000 to the Dry Creek Bridge Wingwall Repair Project at Alvarado-Niles Road, City Project No. 24-11 Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-138

5.14. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with ROMA Collaborative, in the Amount of $102,932, for a Total Not-to-Exceed Contract Amount of $177,741, for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Urban and Landscape Design Review of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04 Adopted as part of the Consent Calendar.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-139
12 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 5 of 5 City Council
Special Meeting Minutes
Mayor Singh left the Council Chambers before consideration of Items 5.15 and

5.16. Vice Mayor Patiño presided. The items were considered together.

Motion: Approve Items 5.15 and 5.16.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Councilmember Sakakihara
SECONDER: Councilmember Nishihira
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, and Vice Mayor Patiño
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RECUSED: Mayor Singh

5.15. Adopt Resolutions of Support Authorizing the City Manager, or Their Designee, to File Applications for Inclusion in the Alameda County Transportation Commission 2026 Countywide Transportation Plan and Request Discretionary Funding Through the Alameda County Transportation Commission 2028 Comprehensive Investment Plan, Committing Any Necessary Matching Funds, and Stating Assurances to Complete the Projects
Adopted by the combined motion approving Items 5.15 and 5.16 above.

Enactment Nos.: Resolution Nos. 2026-140 through 2026-144

5.16. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager, or Their Designee, to Submit the Required Project List Authorizing Resolution, to Execute the Certifications and Assurances, and to Submit Authorized Agent Forms for the State Transit Assistance (STA) State of Good Repair (SGR) Program for Union City Transit
Adopted by the combined motion approving Items 5.15 and 5.16 above.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-145
Mayor Singh returned to the Council Chambers and resumed presiding.

6. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Singh adjourned the meeting at 6:37 PM.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Union City on September 22, 2026. /s/Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk
13 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 1 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.2
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approve the September 8, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council approve the meeting minutes.

Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Action Minutes
14 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 1 of 6 City Council / Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes

MINUTES

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Vice Mayor (District 2)
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember (District 1)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, September 8, 2026 | 7:00 PM
City Hall – Tom Kitayama City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Singh called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.

1.1. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Singh led the Pledge of Allegiance.

1.2. Roll Call
Attendance Attendee Name
Present Lance Nishihira, Councilmember
Scott Sakakihara, Councilmember
Jeff Wang, Councilmember (via teleconference)
Jaime Patiño, Vice Mayor
Gary Singh, Mayor
Absent None
Councilmember Wang participated via teleconference from Dallas Marriott Downtown, 650 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(b). He confirmed his location and that no members of the public were present there.

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Singh opened Oral Communications. The following speakers addressed the Council:

Yvonne Valle-Mott
Jack Kwei
Ruben Lopez
15 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 2 of 6 City Council / Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes
In response to concerns regarding 1260 F Street, Economic and Community Development Director Campbell stated that staff would reevaluate code enforcement efforts and send the Neighborhood Preservation Inspector to the property. At Mayor Singh’s request, City Attorney Kokotaylo agreed to consult with staff regarding available options.

Mayor Singh reported that staff was preparing correspondence regarding concerns at the Contempo homeowners association and anticipated sending the letter within two weeks.

City Clerk Pham confirmed that no hands were raised online. There being no further speakers, Mayor Singh closed Oral Communications.

3. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

3.1. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Townsend Public Affairs, Inc., in an Amount Not to Exceed $102,000 for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Research Services
City Manager Malloy introduced the item. Niccolo De Luca, Vice President and Chief Advocacy Officer of Townsend Public Affairs, presented the report and answered Council questions. Mr. De Luca stated that Townsend Public Affairs would follow up with federal agencies regarding the approved funding for the fire engine and streetlight and notify the City when the Governor acted on Assembly Bill 113.

City Clerk Pham reported that no speaker cards had been submitted and no hands were raised online. There were no public speakers.

Motion: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a consulting services agreement with Townsend Public Affairs, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $102,000 for legislative advocacy and grant funding research services.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Vice Mayor Patiño
SECONDER: Councilmember Sakakihara
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-146
16 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 3 of 6 City Council / Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes

3.2. Waive Full Reading and Introduce by Title Only an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City Amending Sections 2.21.030, 2.21.040,

2.23.020, 2.23.030, 2.24.030, 2.25.030, 2.25.040, and 2.26.020 of the Union City Municipal Code to Standardize the Annual Selection of Commission Chairs and Vice Chairs; Adopt a Resolution Establishing a Uniform Selection Process for Chairs and Vice Chairs for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and the Sales Tax and Utility Users' Tax Oversight Committee City Clerk Pham presented the report. City Clerk Pham and City Manager Malloy answered Council questions. Councilmember Wang requested that staff update outdated Youth Commission policies. City Manager Malloy stated that staff would update the policies to align with the Youth Commission’s school-year schedule and procedures.

Motion: Waive full reading and introduce by title only the proposed ordinance standardizing the annual selection of commission chairs and vice chairs beginning in January 2027, and adopt the companion resolution establishing the same schedule for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and the Sales Tax and Utility Users’ Tax Oversight Committee.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Vice Mayor Patiño
SECONDER: Councilmember Wang
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
After the vote, Mayor Singh asked about public participation. City Clerk Pham stated that he had previously reported that he had received no speaker cards and had seen no hands raised online.

The ordinance was introduced, and the companion resolution was adopted.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-147

3.3. Waive Full Reading and Introduce by Title Only an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City Amending Section 2.20.100 of the Union City Municipal Code to Align Ethics Training Requirements with State Law City Clerk Pham presented the report. There were no Council questions.

City Clerk Pham reported that no speaker cards had been submitted and no hands were raised online. Mayor Singh invited public comment; there were no speakers. 17 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 4 of 6 City Council / Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes
Motion: Waive full reading and introduce by title only an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City amending Section 2.20.100 of the Union City Municipal Code to align ethics training requirements with state law.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Councilmember Sakakihara
SECONDER: Vice Mayor Patiño
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The ordinance was introduced.

3.4. Review the League of California Cities 2026 Annual Conference Resolution and Provide Direction to the City’s Voting Delegate
City Manager Malloy presented the report and answered Council questions. Mayor Singh invited public comment; there were no speakers.

Councilmember Wang requested further Council review. City Manager Malloy stated that she would consult Townsend Public Affairs regarding possible amendments, and Vice Mayor Patiño stated that he would notify Councilmember Wang of changes considered by the resolutions committee. No additional Council meeting or study session was scheduled.

Motion: Allow the City’s voting delegates to use their discretion regarding the final vote, including amendments or petitioned resolutions presented during the League of California Cities 2026 Annual Conference and Expo.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Vice Mayor Patiño
SECONDER: Councilmember Wang
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

4. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
There were none.

5. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL
Vice Mayor Patiño reported attending the League of California Cities Public Safety Policy Committee meeting on August 6; the Cal Cities Latino Caucus Public Relations Committee meeting on August 27; the Cal Cities Latino Caucus Board meeting on August 28; and the Cal Cities legislative call-to-action webinar on September 3. He also reported attending the Hispanic Elected Local Officials Board meeting on August 20 and the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Board meeting on August 27. 18 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 5 of 6 City Council / Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Sakakihara reported attending the Housing Authority of Alameda County special meeting on August 5. He reported that the Ava Community Energy Board of Directors’ August meeting had been canceled and that its Finance, Administration, and Procurement Subcommittee would meet on September 9, followed by the Board of Directors meeting the following week.

Councilmember Nishihira reported that the next Alameda County Waste Management Authority (StopWaste) meeting would be on September 10, and the City Council and New Haven Unified School District joint meeting would be on September 14.

Councilmember Wang reported attending the Youth Commission swearing-in on August 12 and the National League of Cities Public Safety and Crime Prevention Committee meeting on August 27. He also noted the September 14 joint meeting between the City Council and the New Haven Unified School District.

Mayor Singh reported attending a Utility Users Tax meeting in August and administering the oath to Youth Commission members.

6. GOOD OF THE ORDER
Vice Mayor Patiño reported hosting the Philippine Consul General and staff and participating in a Tri-City Voice interview regarding proposed Office of Management and Budget rule changes on July 30; attending the Centro de Servicios backpack giveaway and Larry Orozco car show on August 8; meeting with Fremont Bank and City Manager Malloy on August 11 regarding possible sponsorship of Larry Orozco Teen Workshop repairs; attending a workshop improvements committee meeting on August 13; attending the Brickhouse Boxing event at the Mark Green Sports Center on August 15, the Cambria gathering on August 20, the Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center employee appreciation event on August 21, and the Bay Area Artist Showcase at Studio 11 on August 29; hosting a Taiwanese delegation on August 31; and attending the Unionist of the Year dinner in Oakland. He also reported attending the Cal Cities Champions of Equity ceremony in East Palo Alto on September 3. He requested adjournment in memory of Rhonda Shannon Alcazar; Mayor Singh granted the request.

Councilmember Sakakihara reported attending National Night Out.

Councilmember Nishihira announced Daily Bowl’s tenth anniversary celebration on September 26 at the Ruggieri Senior Center.

Councilmember Wang reported attending National Night Out on August 4, the Sister City Festival on August 16, and a luncheon with Taiwanese delegates and the Chamber of Commerce, hosted by Re-Teck, on the 24th.

Mayor Singh reported attending backpack giveaways at Centro de Servicios and a church on Western Avenue, the Cambria gathering, a Taiwanese delegation event, and a sister city event. He reported meeting with representatives of the business improvement district regarding the upcoming Sama-Sama festival. He requested that City Manager Malloy evaluate potential City assistance and report back to the Council at its next meeting; City Manager Malloy agreed. No funding was approved.

7. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Singh adjourned the meeting at 8:01 PM in memory of Rhonda Shannon Alcazar. 19 of 331
September 8, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 6 of 6 City Council / Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council and Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Union City on September 22, 2026.
/s/Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk and Secretary to the Successor Agency
20 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.3
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Waive Further Reading and Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City Amending Sections 2.21.030, 2.21.040,

2.23.020, 2.23.030, 2.24.030, 2.25.030, 2.25.040, and 2.26.020 of the Union City Municipal Code to Standardize the Annual Selection of Commission Chairs and Vice Chairs

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the ordinance introduced on September 8, 2026, to establish a common annual schedule for selecting commission chairs and vice chairs. The five affected commissions would elect officers at their first regular meeting in January, or at the first regular meeting thereafter if they do not meet in January. The new cycle would begin in 2027. If adopted on September 22, 2026, the ordinance would take effect on October 22, 2026.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This item supports Goal B: Governance and Organizational Effectiveness, as identified in the September 8 staff report, by establishing consistent commission procedures and aligning officer selection with calendar-year appointments.

BACKGROUND
On September 8, 2026, the City Council voted 5–0 to waive full reading and introduce the ordinance. The Council also adopted the companion resolution establishing the same officer-selection schedule for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and the Sales Tax and Utility Users’ Tax Oversight Committee. That resolution has already been adopted and does not require a second reading.

The ordinance follows the City’s transition to calendar-year appointments. Existing Municipal Code provisions require officer elections to be held in different months, and some commission bylaws set conflicting dates.
21 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.3
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 September 22, 2026

DISCUSSION
The ordinance amends Union City Municipal Code Sections 2.21.030, 2.21.040,

2.23.020, 2.23.030, 2.24.030, 2.25.030, 2.25.040, and 2.26.020 (the “Code”). It applies to the Park and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, Human Relations Commission, Senior Citizens Commission, and Arts & Culture Commission. Staff proposes adoption of the ordinance as introduced.

Officers would assume office upon election and serve until successors are elected, unless removed or replaced sooner. An officer vacancy would be filled at the next regular meeting at which the election can be properly noticed.

The transition provisions carry the affected 2026 officers into the first officer election after January 1, 2027. If adopted as scheduled, the Arts & Culture Commission would not hold a separate officer election in December 2026. Staff liaisons would coordinate the required agenda items and conforming bylaw updates.

During the September 8 discussion, Councilmember Wang requested updates to outdated Youth Commission policies. The City Manager stated that staff would align those policies with the Youth Commission’s school-year schedule and procedures. That followup is separate from this ordinance, which does not change the Youth Commission’s schedule.

Adoption on September 22 would make the ordinance effective October 22, 2026. The annual January election cycle would begin in 2027.

FISCAL IMPACT
No additional appropriation is requested. Staff would complete agenda preparation, implementation, and bylaw coordination within existing resources.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council waive further reading and adopt the ordinance amending Union City Municipal Code Sections 2.21.030, 2.21.040, 2.23.020, 2.23.030,

2.24.030, 2.25.030, 2.25.040, and 2.26.020 to standardize the annual selection of commission chairs and vice chairs beginning in January 2027.

Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
22 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.3
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 September 22, 2026 Attachments

1. Proposed ordinance, including Exhibit A, Municipal Code Amendments 23 of 331
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AMENDING SECTIONS 2.21.030, 2.21.040, 2.23.020, 2.23.030, 2.24.030,

2.25.030, 2.25.040, AND 2.26.020 OF THE UNION CITY MUNICIPAL

CODE TO STANDARDIZE THE ANNUAL SELECTION OF COMMISSION

CHAIRS AND VICE CHAIRS
WHEREAS, the City Council has established the Park and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, Human Relations Commission, Senior Citizens Commission, and Arts & Culture Commission in Chapters 2.21, 2.23, 2.24, 2.25, and 2.26 of the Union City Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Union City Municipal Code currently requires these commissions to select their Chair and Vice Chair in different months, including August, January, and December; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025- 029 to standardize the start and expiration dates for new appointments to City boards, commissions, and committees so that such terms align with the calendar year; and WHEREAS, selecting commission officers at the first regular meeting in January, or the first regular meeting thereafter, will align officer selection with the City's calendaryear appointment cycle and provide a consistent annual organization process; and WHEREAS, a uniform officer-selection schedule will improve administrative consistency, reduce conflicts between the Municipal Code and commission bylaws, and support orderly governance.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals.

The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into this Ordinance by this reference.

Section 2. Municipal Code Amendments.

Sections 2.21.030, 2.21.040, 2.23.020, 2.23.030, 2.24.030, 2.25.030, 2.25.040, and

2.26.020 of the Union City Municipal Code are amended as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act.

The City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act because it constitutes an organizational and administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, sections 15060(c)(3) and 15378(b)(5). 24 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
January Officer Selection for City Commissions

Page 2 of 7 ends

Section 4. Severability.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. Publication and Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption. Within 15 days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in Alameda County and circulated in the City of Union City, in accordance with Government Code section 36933. 25 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
January Officer Selection for City Commissions

Page 3 of 7 ends

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Union City held on September 8, 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Union City held on September 22, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments

1. Exhibit A – Municipal Code Amendments
26 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
January Officer Selection for City Commissions

Page 4 of 7 ends

EXHIBIT A

MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS
Deletions are shown in strikethrough; additions are shown in underline.

Section 2.21.030. Term of office—Filling vacancies—Chairperson.

The term of office of the members of the Park and Recreation Commission shall be four years. The terms of office for the five current members shall expire in accordance with the terms of office in effect at the time of appointment. In the event of a vacancy or term expiration of a Commissioner or alternate, the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council, shall appoint successors to fill any vacancies for a term of four years or the unexpired portion thereof. Each Park and Recreation Commissioner or alternate so appointed shall serve until his/her their successor is duly appointed and qualified.

Annually, during the month of August, or as soon thereafter as the Park and Recreation Commission holds a regular meeting, the Park and Recreation Commission shall elect from among its members a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson to serve for one year. At its first regular meeting in January of each year, or at its first regular meeting thereafter if no regular meeting is held in January, the Park and Recreation Commission shall elect from among its members a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson. Each officer shall assume office immediately upon election and shall serve until a successor is elected, unless removed or replaced sooner by the Park and Recreation Commission. If a vacancy occurs in either office, the Park and Recreation Commission shall elect one of its members to fill the vacancy at the next regular meeting at which the election can be properly noticed. Each person serving as Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson as of August 1, 2026, or thereafter shall continue to serve until the first officer election after January 1, 2027.

Section 2.21.040. Officers.

On annual organization, the Park and Recreation Commission shall elect a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson to serve at the pleasure of the Park and Recreation Commission.

The Park and Recreation Commission shall have a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, and Secretary. The Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson shall be selected in accordance with Section 2.21.030. A Secretary shall be designated for the recording of the minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission and to keep a record of its resolutions, proceedings, and transactions. The Secretary shall be the Community and Recreation Services Director or his/her their appointee and shall not be a member of the Commission entitled to vote.

Section 2.23.020. Term of office—Filling vacancies—Chairperson.

The term of office of the Planning Commission shall be four years. In the event of a vacancy or term of a Commissioner or alternate, the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council, shall appoint successors to fill any vacancies for a term of four years or the unexpired portion thereof. Each Planning Commissioner so appointed shall serve until his/her their successor is duly appointed and qualified. The Mayor shall designate the Chairperson for the first Planning Commission to be appointed and annually, during the month of August or as soon thereafter as the Planning Commission holds a regular 27 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
January Officer Selection for City Commissions

Page 5 of 7 ends

meeting, the Planning Commission shall elect from among its members a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson to serve for one year. At its first regular meeting in January of each year, or at its first regular meeting thereafter if no regular meeting is held in January, the Planning Commission shall elect from among its members a Chairperson and a ViceChairperson. Each officer shall assume office immediately upon election and shall serve until a successor is elected, unless removed or replaced sooner by the Planning Commission. If a vacancy occurs in either office, the Planning Commission shall elect one of its members to fill the vacancy at the next regular meeting at which the election can be properly noticed. Each person serving as Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson as of August 1, 2026 or thereafter shall continue to serve until the first officer election after January 1, 2027.

Section 2.23.030. Officers.

On annual organization or upon a vacancy of a Chairperson and/or a Vice-Chairperson, the Planning Commission shall elect a Chairperson and/or a Vice-Chairperson to serve at the pleasure of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall have a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, and Secretary. The Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson shall be selected in accordance with Section 2.23.020. A Secretary shall be designated for the recording of minutes of the Planning Commission and to keep a record of its resolutions, proceedings and transactions. The Secretary shall be the Community Development Director or his/her their appointee and shall not be a member of the Commission entitled to vote.

Section 2.24.030. Officers.

A. The Mayor shall designate the Chairperson and the Vice-Chairperson for the first Human Relations Commission to be appointed, and annually thereafter, during the month of January, the Human Relations Commission shall elect from among its members a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson to serve for one year. At its first regular meeting in January of each year, or at its first regular meeting thereafter if no regular meeting is held in January, the Human Relations Commission shall elect from among its members a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson. Each officer shall assume office immediately upon election and shall serve until a successor is elected, unless removed or replaced sooner by the Human Relations Commission. If a vacancy occurs in either office, the Human Relations Commission shall elect one of its members to fill the vacancy at the next regular meeting at which the election can be properly noticed.

B. On annual organization or upon vacancy of a Chairperson and/or a Vice-Chairperson, the Human Relations Commission shall elect a Chairperson and/or a Vice-Chairperson to serve at the pleasure of the Human Relations Commission. The Human Relations Commission shall have a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, and Secretary. The Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson shall be selected in accordance with Section

2.24.030.A. A Ssecretary shall be designated for the recording of minutes of the Human Relations Commission and to keep a record of its resolutions, proceedings and transactions. The Ssecretary shall be the Deputy City Manager or his/her their appointee and shall not be a member of the Commission entitled to vote. 28 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
January Officer Selection for City Commissions

Page 6 of 7 ends

Section 2.25.030. Term of office—Filling vacancies—Chairperson.

The term of office of the members of the Senior Citizens Commission shall be four years.

The term of office for the five current members shall expire consistent with the terms of office at the time of appointment. In the event of a vacancy or term expiration of a Commissioner or alternate, the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council, shall appoint successors to fill any vacancies for a term of four years or the unexpired portion thereof.

Each Senior Citizens Commissioner so appointed shall serve until his/her their successor is duly appointed and qualified. Annually, during the month of August, the Senior Commission shall elect from among its members a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson to serve for one year. At its first regular meeting in January of each year, or at its first regular meeting thereafter if no regular meeting is held in January, the Senior Citizens Commission shall elect from among its members a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson.

Each officer shall assume office immediately upon election and shall serve until a successor is elected, unless removed or replaced sooner by the Senior Citizens Commission. If a vacancy occurs in either office, the Senior Citizens Commission shall elect one of its members to fill the vacancy at the next regular meeting at which the election can be properly noticed. Each person serving as Chairperson or ViceChairperson as of August 1, 2026 or thereafter shall continue to serve until the first officer election after January 1, 2027.

Section 2.25.040. Officers.

On annual vacancy or upon vacancy of a Chairperson and/or a Vice-Chairperson, the Senior Citizens Commission shall elect a Chairperson and/or a Vice-Chairperson, to serve at the pleasure of the Senior Citizens Commission. The Senior Citizens Commission shall have a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, and Secretary. The Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson shall be selected in accordance with Section

2.25.030. A Secretary shall be designated for the recording of minutes of the Senior Citizens Commission and to keep a record of its resolutions, proceedings and transactions. The Secretary shall be the Community and Recreation Services Director or their appointee and shall not be a member of the Commission entitled to vote.

Section 2.26.020. Appointment—Qualifications of members—Officers and duties.

In order to further the public policy of the City, there is created and established an Arts & Culture Commission for the City of Union City, California consisting of five members plus two alternates, who shall be appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council.

Members of the Arts & Culture Commission shall either be a resident citizen at large or an artist.

The Commission shall elect one of its members to serve as Chair of the Commission, and another member as Vice Chair; officers shall be elected in December of each calendar year and shall serve one-year terms. On annual organization or upon vacancy of a Chairperson and/or a Vice-Chairperson, the Arts & Culture Commission shall elect a Chairperson and/or a Vice-Chairperson to serve at the pleasure of the Arts & Culture Commission. At its first regular meeting in January of each year, or at its first regular meeting thereafter if no regular meeting is held in January, the Arts & Culture Commission shall elect from among its members a Chair and a Vice Chair. Each officer shall assume 29 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
January Officer Selection for City Commissions

Page 7 of 7 ends

office immediately upon election and shall serve until a successor is elected, unless removed or replaced sooner by the Arts & Culture Commission. If a vacancy occurs in either office, the Arts & Culture Commission shall elect one of its members to fill the vacancy at the next regular meeting at which the election can be properly noticed. Each person serving as Chair or Vice Chair as of August 1, 2026 or thereafter shall continue to serve until the first officer election after January 1, 2027. The duties of the Chair shall be to set meeting dates, times and locations for Commission meetings, conduct Commission meetings, and represent the Commission before the City Council and the general public.

The duties of the Vice Chair shall be to assume the duties of Chair in the absence of the Chair.
30 of 331
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AMENDING SECTION 2.20.100 OF THE UNION CITY MUNICIPAL CODE

TO ALIGN ETHICS TRAINING REQUIREMENTS WITH STATE LAW
WHEREAS, Union City Municipal Code Section 2.20.100(A)(1) requires each Commissioner and alternate to complete at least two hours of training in general ethics principles and ethics laws no later than one year from the first day of service; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 827 (Chapter 661, Statutes of 2025) amended Government Code Section 53235.1(b)(1), effective January 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53235.1(b)(1), as amended, requires a local agency official who commences service on or after January 1, 2026, to complete ethics training no later than six months from the first day of service, while retaining the one-year deadline for an official who commenced service before January 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to conform the ethics-training deadline in the Union City Municipal Code to current state law while preserving the applicable transition for service that commenced before January 1, 2026, and to maintain alignment with any future amendment to the state-law deadline or any successor provision.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals.

The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into this Ordinance by this reference.

Section 2. Municipal Code Amendment.

Subsection (A)(1) of Section 2.20.100 of the Union City Municipal Code is amended as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. All other provisions of Section 2.20.100 remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act.

The City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act because it constitutes an organizational and administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to California Code of Regulations, title 14, sections 15060(c)(3) and 15378(b)(5). 31 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
Ethics Training Deadline Alignment Ordinance

Page 2 of 3 ends

Section 4. Severability.

Section 5. Publication and Effective Date.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Union City held on September 8, 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Union City held on September 22, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments

1. Exhibit A – Municipal Code Amendment
32 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
Ethics Training Deadline Alignment Ordinance

Page 3 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT A

MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT
Deletions are shown in strikethrough; additions are shown in underline.

Section 2.20.100. Ethics/AB 1234 and Other Training Requirements.

A. Pursuant to the requirements of Assembly Bill 1234, as codified in Government Code Section 53234 et seq., Commissioners and alternates are required to complete the following training in general ethics principles and ethics laws:

1. Each Commissioner and alternate must complete at least two hours of training in general ethics principles and ethics laws relevant to his or her public service no later than one year from the first day of service as a Commissioner or alternate if service commenced before January 1, 2026, and no later than six months from the first day of service as a Commissioner or alternate if service commences on or after January 1, 2026, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 53235.1 of the Government Code.

Page 1 of 3 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AMENDING SECTION 2.20.100 OF THE UNION CITY MUNICIPAL CODE

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals.

The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into this Ordinance by this reference.

Section 2. Municipal Code Amendment.

Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act.

The City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act because it constitutes an organizational and administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to California Code of Regulations, title 14, sections 15060(c)(3) and 15378(b)(5). 34 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
Ethics Training Deadline Alignment Ordinance

Page 2 of 3 ends

Section 4. Severability.

Section 5. Publication and Effective Date.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Union City held on September 8, 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Union City held on September 22, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments

1. Exhibit A – Municipal Code Amendment
35 of 331
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
Ethics Training Deadline Alignment Ordinance

Page 3 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT A

MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT
Deletions are shown in strikethrough; additions are shown in underline.

Section 2.20.100. Ethics/AB 1234 and Other Training Requirements.

Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if subdivision (b)(1) of Section 53235.1 of the Government Code, as amended from time to time, or any successor provision prescribes a different deadline applicable to that Commissioner or alternate for completing the initial ethics training, the deadline prescribed by state law shall control.
…
36 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.5
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees Related to Retirement Benefits

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving an amendment to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees to clarify and update the provisions governing employer-paid member contributions (EPMC) and employee cost sharing for CalPERS retirement benefits and make other minor revisions for clarification on classifications and to include the link to the posted salary schedule. These changes are not substantive and merely reflect actions already approved by the City Council.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This change supports Goal B, Governance and Organization Effectiveness, of the strategic plan in aligning local government best practices and supporting employee retention.

BACKGROUND
The Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees applies to designated Department Head, Management, and Non-Management classifications. The Plan currently identifies the applicable classifications and provides that these positions receive compensation and benefits pursuant to the Plan and the City’s Compensation Plan and salary schedule.

Section 6.00 of the Plan addresses retirement benefits under CalPERS. The current Plan references Resolution No. 5885-22 and identifies the City’s EPMC provisions.

The proposed redlined amendments are intended to clarify this language and ensure that the Plan accurately reflects the City’s current administration of these provisions. 37 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.5
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 September 22, 2026 The City’s Human Resources Department, in coordination with the Finance Department and the City Attorney’s Office, reviewed and updated the Compensation and Benefit Plan in accordance with the guidance provided by the CalPERS Audit Resolution Unit to ensure the necessary guidance and appropriate language. CalPERS recommended that the City incorporate language consistent with the City’s existing EPMC resolution into the Compensation and Benefit Plan. This results in no substantive change.

DISCUSSION
The proposed revisions primarily affect Section 6.00, Retirement Benefits (CalPERS).

The amendments clarify the provisions governing Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) for CalPERS Classic Members and distinguish the applicable EPMC provisions based upon employee membership status and applicable retirement formula. Specifically, the revised language identifies the City’s EPMC treatment for Classic Miscellaneous Employees hired on or before November 29, 2010, and for those hired on or after November 30, 2010. The revised language also expressly provides that the City does not pay and report EPMC for CalPERS New Members, consistent with Government Code Section 7522.34.

The proposed amendments also clarify the employee cost-sharing provisions associated with the CalPERS retirement plans. Rather than identifying a single employee contribution percentage for all employees within a retirement formula, the revised language recognizes that employee cost-sharing may vary by group.

The revisions further clarify that contribution levels may change based upon the CalPERS valuation report. This language is intended to recognize that CalPERS contribution requirements are subject to periodic actuarial valuation and that employee cost-sharing arrangements may also be affected by applicable negotiated agreements. The revised language therefore provides greater flexibility for the Compensation and Benefit Plan to accurately describe the City’s obligations and employee contributions as those amounts change over time.

The proposed amendments do not otherwise modify the substantive compensation and benefit provisions contained in the Plan. The Plan continues to provide the applicable retirement formulas and benefits for Classic Members and New Members. The change was requested by CalPERS.

The City recommends revising the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees to include pay and reporting for EPMC and to update the cost-sharing to reflect current levels.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no additional fiscal impact, as salaries are based on the approved Classification and Compensation Plan and would remain so.

RECOMMENDATION
The City recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving amendments to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees, as set forth in Exhibit 38 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.5
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 September 22, 2026 A, to update and clarify provisions related to CalPERS Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) and employee cost sharing.

Prepared by: Jaime Rabe, Human Resources Manager
Submitted by: Jason Castleberry, Human Resources Director Attachments

1. Draft Resolution

2. Exhibit A – Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees (redlined) 39 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Amendment to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION AND

BENEFIT PLAN FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES RELATING TO

RETIREMENT BENEFITS
WHEREAS, the City of Union City (the “City”) has previously adopted and periodically amended the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees, which was last updated on April 22, 2025 (the “Plan”); and WHEREAS, classifications that are subject to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees are unrepresented employees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has identified in the Strategic Plan Goal B, Governance and Organization Effectiveness, the need to align local government best practices and support employee retention.

WHEREAS, the City has reviewed internally to verify that the updated retirement changes align with CalPERS regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed amendments to the Plan and finds that the terms and conditions of the amendments are proper and in the best interests of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby approves an amendment to the Plan as provided in the attached document; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes an amendment to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees' retirement section; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the City Manager to take such further actions as may be necessary to implement the Plan, including any necessary non-substantive modifications in a form approved by the City Attorney.
40 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Amendment to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on September 22, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachment:

1. Exhibit A - Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees (redlined) 41 of 331
1 COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT PLAN

FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES
Department Heads, Management and Non-Management
Updated January 14September 22, 20265
(Excludes Unrepresented Seasonal positions)
42 of 331
2 Table of Contents
SECTION 1.00 CLASSIFICATIONS............................................................................................................................3 SECTION 2.00 COMPENSATION.............................................................................................................................5 A. ACTING PAY (FOR MANAGEMENT AND NON-MANAGEMENT ONLY)...............................................................................5 C. BILINGUAL PAY (FOR MANAGEMENT AND NON-MANAGEMENT ONLY)...........................................................................5 D. VEHICLE ALLOWANCE (FOR DEPARTMENT HEADS ONLY):.............................................................................................6 E. SALARY STEP SCHEDULE ........................................................................................................................................6 F. SALARIES ............................................................................................................................................................6 SECTION 3.00 WORK SCHEDULES .......................................................................................................................6 SECTION 4.00 LEAVE .............................................................................................................................................7 A. ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE FOR FLSA EXEMPT POSITIONS: ...............................................................................................7 B. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE: ..........................................................................................................................................8 C. FAMILY LEAVE: ....................................................................................................................................................9 D. HOLIDAYS ...........................................................................................................................................................9 E. JURY LEAVE:......................................................................................................................................................10 F. MILITARY LEAVE: ...............................................................................................................................................10 G. OCCUPATION INJURY LEAVE: ................................................................................................................................10 H. PERSONAL LEAVE: ..............................................................................................................................................10 I. SICK LEAVE: ......................................................................................................................................................11 J. UNPAID LEAVE OF ABSENCE..................................................................................................................................11 K. VACATION ........................................................................................................................................................12 SECTION 5.00 INSURANCE COVERAGE.................................................................................................................13 A. HEALTH AND WELFARE COVERAGE ........................................................................................................................13 B. LIFE INSURANCE:................................................................................................................................................14 C. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (FOR DEPARTMENT HEADS AND MANAGEMENT ONLY) ................................................14 D. DISABILITY INSURANCE: .......................................................................................................................................14 E. CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT VEBA OR CALGOVEBA (FOR DEPARTMENT HEADS ONLY) .................................................15 SECTION 6.00 RETIREMENT BENEFITS (CALPERS).................................................................................................15 A. CLASSIC MEMBERS:............................................................................................................................................15 B. NEW MEMBERS.................................................................................................................................................16 SECTION 7.00 EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT..................................................................................................18 SECTION 8.00 SEPARATION.................................................................................................................................18 43 of 331
3 SECTION 1.00 CLASSIFICATIONS
The classifications that are participating in this Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees are those identified below:

A. Department Heads, Management and Non-Management Classifications The classifications listed below of unrepresented positions shall be compensated pursuant to the City’s Compensation Plan and the salary schedule as set forth in Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The below classifications shall be compensated and receive benefits pursuant to this Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees

DEPARTMENT HEADS UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT
Assistant to the City Manager
Chief Human Resources Officer
Chief Technology Officer
City Clerk
Human Resources Analyst I
Human Resources Analyst II
Human Resources Manager
Supervising Construction Inspector
Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial
Officer
Deputy City Manager
Economic and Community Development
Director
Finance Director
Human Resources Director
Information Technology Director
Community and Recreation Services
Director
Public Works Director

UNREPRESENTED NON-MANAGEMENT
Human Resources Technician
Administrative Specialist -
Confidential
B. City Manager
The City Manager works under an Employment Contract tied to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees and the salary schedule as set forth and published on unioncityca.gov/187/HumanResources and incorporated herein by this reference. This reference is effective 1/1/2019.

B.C. Police Department Classifications
The below classifications shall be compensated and receive benefits as identified below in lieu of the compensation and benefits identified in this Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees.
44 of 331
4 Chief of Police: Employment Contract and pursuant to the City’s Compensation Plan and the salary schedule as set forth and published on unioncityca.gov/187/HumanResources and incorporated herein by this reference in Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

Deputy Police Chief: Shall receive compensation pursuant to the City’s Compensation Plan and the salary schedule as set forth and published on unioncityca.gov/187/HumanResources and incorporated herein by this referencein Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and the following benefits outlined in the Union City Police Management (PMA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and successor agreements. • The following benefits:
o Leave (Section 2.00)
o Vacation (Section 3.00)
o Holidays (Section 4.00)
o Educational Incentive (Section 5.00)
o Insurance Coverage (Section 6.00)
o Uniforms (Section 7.00)
o Retiree Medical Plan (Section 8.00)
o Salaries (Section 9.00)
o Retirement (Section 10.00)
o Retirement Benefits (Section 11.00)
Police Officer Trainee: Shall receive compensation pursuant to the City’s Compensation Plan and the salary schedule as set forth and published on unioncityca.gov/187/HumanResources and incorporated herein by this referencein Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and the following benefits provided to Sworn positions outlined in the Union City Police Officers’ Association (POA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and successor agreements, with the exception of CalPERS retirement benefits which will be equivalent to the CalPERS retirement benefits provided to Non-Sworn POA positions:
• CalPERS Retirement (Sections 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4)
• The following benefits:
o Medical/Dental/Vision/Cash In-Lieu (Sections 5.1 and 5.4). o Life Insurance (Section 5.2)
o Disability Insurance (Section 5.3)
o Holiday Leave/Pay (Section 4.9 for Sworn Employees)
o Sick Leave (Sections 4.1 through 4.8).

Police Cadet: Shall receive compensation pursuant to the City’s Compensation Plan and the salary schedule as set forth and published on unioncityca.gov/187/HumanResources and incorporated herein by this reference in Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and the following benefits provided to non-Sworn positions outlined in the Union City Police Officers' Association (POA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and successor agreements, prorated based on their part-time position's equivalency to a full-time position:
45 of 331
5 • CalPERS Retirement (Sections 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4)
• The following benefits:
o Medical/Dental/Vision/Cash In-Lieu (Sections 5.1 and 5.4) o Life Insurance (Section 5.2)
o Disability Insurance (Section 5.3)
o Holiday Leave/Pay (Section 4.9 for Non-Sworn Employees) o Sick Leave (Sections 4.1 through 4.8).

Police Cadets shall also receive the following:
• An annual uniform allowance of four hundred dollars ($400.00). o Uniform allowance payments shall be made in twenty-six (26) equal payments coinciding with each pay period.
• New employees shall receive an initial uniform allowance of two hundred thirty five dollars ($235.00) and begin receiving the annual uniform allowance on the first pay period after July 1, following hire.

SECTION 2.00 COMPENSATION
Administration of the Compensation Plan:

The Compensation Plan may provide a flat salary rate or a defined salary range for each employee classification with a minimum/maximum salary level and one or more intermediate steps.

A. Acting Pay (For Management and Non-Management only)
Employees who are assigned by the Department Head or their designee to assume the duties of a position of higher classification and have been assigned and worked one full day or more shall be paid at the first step of the higher classification or 5%, whichever is higher.

B. Special Assignment Pay
The City Manager may, upon recommendation of the appropriate department head or upon their own determination as appropriate, award up to an additional 15% salary increase to an employee for special assignment. Such discretionary additional compensation shall be assigned only for the regular and continuous performance of special assignments and shall not be used as a merit or bonus payment.

C. Bilingual Pay (For Management and Non-Management only) The City will compensate each management employee one hundred dollars ($100) per month ($46.15 per pay period) as compensation for providing bilingual skills, oral and/or written. All employees requesting compensation under this agreement must be certified by the City as possessing the required bilingual abilities. Certification may examine the employee's ability to converse fluently, read and/or write in a language other than 46 of 331
6 English. The City reserves the right to determine the need for a specific language and the number of employees required to provide bilingual skills in each language. Compensated employees agree to utilize their bilingual skills whenever called upon.

D. Vehicle Allowance (For Department Heads only):

Employees shall be provided a vehicle allowance in the amount of Four Hundred Dollars ($400) per month ($184.62 per pay period).

E. Salary Step Schedule
Salary Step increases shall be implemented in the following manner:

An employee who is eligible for a step increase and whose anniversary date occurs during the first seven (7) days of the pay period shall have his/her step increase implemented on the first day of the pay period during which the anniversary date occurs.

An employee who is eligible for a step increase and whose anniversary date occurs during the last seven (7) days of the pay period shall have his/her step increase implemented on the first day of the following pay period.

F. Salaries
Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2025, the City will provide each unrepresented classification subject to this Compensation and Benefits Plan with a costof-living increase of three percent (3.0%).

Effective the first full pay period following January 1, 2026, the City will provide each unrepresented classification subject to this Compensation and Benefits Plan with a cost-of-living increase of three percent (3.0%).

Effective the first full pay period of January 1, 2027, the City will provide each unrepresented classification subject to this Compensation and Benefits Plan with a cost-of-living increase of three percent (3.0%).

SECTION 3.00 WORK SCHEDULES
The City normally operates on a 9/80 work schedule with employees working eighty (80) hours over nine (9) consecutive business days, Monday through Friday. However, Department Heads, with the City Manager approval, shall structure the work schedules for all Management and Non-Management employees in their department. In structuring schedules, the Department Head shall be governed by the priority to provide quality service to the community. In delivering these services Department Heads have the opportunity to consider flexible scheduling options.

These scheduling opportunities shall remain solely at the City’s discretion. 47 of 331
7 SECTION 4.00 LEAVE
A. Administrative Leave for FLSA exempt positions:

In lieu of paid overtime, Unrepresented Management employees shall receive seventy (70) hours of Administrative Leave at the beginning of each fiscal year. In addition, those management employees whose work assignments require additional work effort and/or attendance at evening and/or weekend meetings and/or special events on behalf of the City above and beyond seventy (70) hours per fiscal year shall be eligible for an additional forty (40) hours per fiscal year of Administrative Leave (II) for a total of one hundred ten (110) hours. Additional Administrative Leave is subject to the recommendation of the Department Head and approval by the City Manager.

Department Head employees shall receive one hundred fifty (150) hours of Administrative Leave at the beginning of each fiscal year. In addition, those management employees whose work assignments require additional work effort and/or attendance at evening and/or weekend meetings and/or special events on behalf of the City above and beyond 150 hours per fiscal year shall be eligible for an additional ten (10) hours per fiscal year of Administrative Leave for a total of one hundred (160) hours.

Effective fiscal year 2022-2023, Department Head employees shall receive one hundred sixty (160) hours of Administrative Leave at the beginning of each fiscal year.

The guidelines for making use of Administrative Leave will be as follows:

1. Employees shall submit requests for time off under Administrative Leave in writing directly to their immediate supervisor. The supervisor will approve or deny the request based upon operational needs.

2. Administrative Leave is based on the City’s fiscal year and therefore runs from July 1 to June 30.

3. Administrative Leave for employees hired after July 1 or who leave prior to June 30 of the following year will be prorated.

4. Employees may not use Administrative Leave during their first six months of service. (Exceptions to this rule may be granted by the City Manager).

For Unrepresented Management only: For fiscal year 2021-2022, unused Administrative Leave may be accumulated up to a maximum of two hundred forty (240) hours or may be cashed out as requested by the employee at the end of the fiscal year 2022 only. Said payment shall be based upon the employee's salary rate at the time of the cash out request. For separation provisions concerning Administrative Leave, please see Section

8.00 of this document. The unused 240-hour accumulation does not include the Additional Administrative Leave identified in paragraph below.

The award of additional Administrative Leave is subject to the recommendation of the Department Head and approval by the City Manager. The first 10 (ten) hours of additional Administrative Leave awarded will be deposited in the same leave bank as 48 of 331
8 regular, recurring Administrative Leave, (70 hours). Additional Administrative Leave awarded above 10 hours will be loaded in a separate Administrative Leave bank and must be used during the fiscal year awarded. These hours are awarded for the prior year’s work and may not be accumulated or cashed out.

For Department Heads only: For fiscal year 2021-2022, unused Administrative Leave may be carried over to the subsequent fiscal year or may be cashed out as requested by the employee at the end of fiscal year 2022 only. Cash out is up to maximum accruals.

Said payment shall be based upon the employee's salary rate at the time of the cash out request. For separation provisions concerning Administrative Leave, please see Section

10.00 of this document. For fiscal year 2022-23, Department Heads may sell back up to their maximum accrual by December 31, 2022.

For Department Heads and Unrepresented Management: Effective calendar year 2023, and every calendar year thereafter, under the following conditions employees may make an irrevocable election to sell back to the City accrued administrative leave per fiscal year at the employee’s base rate of pay. Unrepresented Management positions may make an irrevocable election to sell back to the City up to seventy (70) hours. Department Head positions may make an irrevocable election to sell back to the City up to one hundred and sixty (160) hours. At the time of distribution, the following must be true:
• The employee is in good standing and meeting performance expectations on the last performance evaluation received.
• The employee must have taken a minimum of eighty (80) hours of vacation, holiday and/or administrative leave in the preceding twelve (12) months.

Requests to sell back administrative leave must be received by Payroll no later than December 31 for the following year’s election.

The City makes no representation as to the tax consequences of an employee cashing out accrued leave. It is the employee’s sole responsibility to address the tax consequences of cashing out accrued leave.

B. Bereavement Leave:

Employees may be granted paid bereavement leave, not to exceed five (5) workdays, upon the occasion of the death of a close relative. The five days may be taken nonconsecutively. Close relatives are defined as mother, father, sister, brother, spouse, child, grandparent, grandchild, mother-in-law, father-in-law, sister-in-law, brother-inlaw, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, stepmother, stepfather, stepchild, domestic partner, or individuals residing in the household for whom the employee has legal guardianship.

In addition, employees may be granted one (1) workday’s paid bereavement leave to attend the funeral of a close relative not in the employee’s immediate family (for example, aunts, uncles, nephews, nieces, or spouse/domestic partner's close relatives as defined above).
49 of 331
9 C. Family Leave:

The City shall comply with all provisions of the Federal Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), including their respective implementing regulations. However, Administrative Policy Memorandum (APM) #61 shall provide the overriding basis and criteria for all decisions and matters relating to Family Leave.

D. Holidays
The following are holidays:

New Year’s Day January 1
Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Birthday 3
rd Monday in January
President’s Day 3
rd Monday in February
Memorial Day Last Monday in May
Juneteenth June 19th
Independence Day July 4
Labor Day 1
st Monday in September
Veteran’s Day November 11
Thanksgiving Day 4
th Thursday in November
Friday after Thanksgiving 4
th Friday in November
Christmas Eve December 24*
Christmas Day December 25
Floating Holidays
Each employee shall also be granted twenty-four (24) additional Floating Holiday hours per fiscal year, which may be scheduled for use upon approval. The Floating Holiday hours, if not used within the fiscal year earned, may not be accumulated.

In the event a holiday falls on a normal day off which is either a Saturday or the first day off of the two normal days off, the employee shall observe the previous workday as the holiday. In the event a designated holiday falls upon a normal day off which is either a Sunday or the second day of the two normal days off, the employee shall observe the following workday as the holiday.

Should the holiday fall on a closed (non-working) Friday, eight (8) additional floating holiday hours shall be added to each employee's floating holiday bank in the pay period immediately before the holiday.
*Christmas Eve Observed
If Christmas Day falls on a Saturday, the Christmas Day holiday is observed on Friday; the Christmas Eve holiday is then observed on Thursday. If Christmas Day falls on a Sunday, the Christmas Day holiday is observed on Monday; there is no Christmas Eve 50 of 331
10 holiday observance. When Christmas Day falls on Monday, there is no Christmas Eve holiday observance.

City offices shall be closed between Christmas Day and New Year's Day.

For Non-Management Employees Only:

Prior approval for holiday work must be obtained from the City Manager, except in an emergency situation where said approval cannot be obtained. Work performed on a holiday shall be compensated at time and one-half the straight time hourly rate, in addition to regular salary.

E. Jury Leave:

An employee summoned to jury duty or summoned as a witness in a City-related matter shall not suffer a loss of pay or other benefits by reason of said service. Employees are required to submit verification of jury leave attendance to their supervisor promptly upon returning to work. The juror badge attached to the jury summons notice does not qualify as verification of attendance.

F. Military Leave:

Military Leave shall be granted in accordance with the provisions of State law. All employees entitled to Military Leave shall give their Department Head an opportunity within the limits of military requirements to determine when such leave shall be taken.

G. Occupation Injury Leave:

For employee injury or disability falling within the provisions of the State Worker's Compensation Act, additional compensation equal to the difference between said employee’s regular pay and their disability compensation allowance shall be paid for a total not to exceed one-hundred seventy-six (176) hours or equal to one-half the amount of the employee's accumulated Sick Leave balance as of July 1 for each fiscal year, whichever is greater.

Included in the calculation of the one-hundred seventy-six (176) hours granted will be compensation for any waiting period. Following exhaustion of this benefit, employees may utilize accumulated Sick Leave to the extent available to make up the difference between said employee’s regular pay and their disability compensation allowance.

H. Personal Leave:

The City shall allow twenty (20) hours per fiscal year of accumulated Sick Leave to be used for conducting personal or emergency business that cannot be conducted outside 51 of 331
11 regular working hours. An additional eight (8) hours will be allowed for those employees who have an accumulated Sick Leave balance as of July 1 of each fiscal year of one hundred (100) hours or more for a total of twenty-eight (28) hours per fiscal year. An additional twelve (12) hours will be allowed for those employees who have accumulated a Sick Leave balance as of July 1 of each fiscal year of two hundred (200) hours or more, for a maximum total of forty (40) hours per fiscal year. Personal Leave shall not be used as a substitute for, or in conjunction with any other type of leave. The employee must request Personal Leave at least 48 hours (2 days) prior to time of utilization. In cases of need, the immediate supervisor may waive the 48-hour notification procedure.

I. Sick Leave:

Employees shall earn three and 69/100 (3.69) hours per pay period of Sick Leave without limit on accumulation. Employees absent without pay for more than thirty-six (36) hours during a two week pay period shall not earn sick leave benefits for that pay period. Sick leave shall be taken in periods of no less than one-quarter of an hour.

Sick leave may be utilized due to the employee's personal sickness, injury, maternity leave, sickness, or injury in the immediate family, in accordance with the provisions outlined in Administrative Policy Memorandum (APM) #21, Administration of Sick Leave, which shall serve as the operating guideline for both employees and management.

Employees shall be allowed to convert sixty (60) hours of unused Sick Leave per fiscal year to their Vacation Time Bank provided the employee maintains a balance of fourhundred eighty (480) hours of Sick Leave. Conversion of Sick Leave to Vacation Leave is on an hour-for-hour basis and may only take place at the end of each fiscal year.

J. Unpaid leave of Absence
The City Manager may grant, a regular employee other than a probationary employee, a Leave of Absence without pay for a maximum period of one (1) year. The City Manager may grant an extension of an approved Leave of Absence without pay for an additional period, said extension not to exceed one additional (1) year. An Unpaid Leave of Absence may be granted if it does not have an unduly adverse impact on the service of the City, the purpose of the leave would be beneficial to the City, or it would meet some pressing and extreme need of the employee. Whenever granted, such leave requests shall be in writing and signed by the City Manager.

Upon expiration of the Unpaid Leave of Absence, the employee will be reinstated to the position held at the time leave was granted. Failure of the employee to report promptly at the expiration of the Unpaid Leave of Absence, or within a reasonable time after 52 of 331
12 notice to return to duty shall terminate their right to be reinstated. Unpaid Leaves of Absence shall not be taken during the first six (6) months of City employment.

Employee is fully responsible for all benefit premiums while on approved Unpaid Leave of Absence.

K. Vacation
Employees shall accrue vacation benefits annually in accordance with the following schedule and provisions:

Years of Service Annual Accrual
Rate
Non-Mgmt. Max
Accrual
Mgmt. Max
Accrual
Dept Head Max
Accrual
0-3 Years 80 160 320 560
4 – 8 Years 120 240 400 560
9-12 Years 140 280 440 560
13-15Years 160 320 480 560
16+ Years 200 400 560 560
• Non-Management employees shall be limited to accruing two times their maximum number of annual accrual rate.
• Management employees shall be limited to accruing two times their maximum number of annual accrual rate plus 160 hours per year.
• Department Heads may accrue up to 560 hours.

The City Manager shall have the authority to provide credit for years of service with a prior agency for newly hired Department Heads for purposes of establishing the vacation accrual rate per City Council Resolution 5793-21.

For calendar year 2022, Management and Non-Management employees may receive annual cash payment for up to eighty (80) hours of Vacation Leave provided an 80-hour balance vacation balance is maintained after cash out. Department Heads may cash out any number of hours provided an 80-hour balance is maintained after cash out.

Effective calendar year 2023, under the following conditions employees may make an irrevocable election to sell back to the City accrued vacation leave per calendar year at the employee’s base rate of pay. Management and Non-Management may make an 53 of 331
13 irrevocable election to sell back up to eighty (80) hours and Department Heads may make an irrevocable election to sell back to the City up to their annual accrual.

At the time of distribution, the following must be true:
• The employee is in good standing and meeting performance expectations on the last performance evaluation received.
• The employee must have taken a minimum of eighty (80) hours of vacation, holiday and/or administrative leave in the preceding twelve (12) months. • The employee must have a remaining balance of at least forty (40) hours following the sell back.

Requests to sell back vacation leave must be received by Payroll no later than December 31 for the following year’s election.

Employees shall receive cash payment for all unused excess Vacation Leave at their current salary rate at the time of separation or upon the start of an extended leave from City employment.

SECTION 5.00 INSURANCE COVERAGE
A. Health and Welfare Coverage
The City shall contribute to the cafeteria plan up to Two Thousand One Hundred and Twenty-Five Dollars ($2,125) per month toward the medical, dental and vision premiums for all employees, regardless of the plan in which they are enrolled. This monthly contribution includes the City's basic employer contribution for health premiums under PEMCHA which City Council Resolution No. 2279-02 set as the minimum required under PEMCHA. Employees shall pay premium costs exceeding the City's maximum contribution amount.

The City agrees to advance the full cost of health premiums (medical, dental, vision, and LTD coverage) when an employee is on leave without pay for medical reasons. Amounts advanced shall be limited to three (3) months beyond any FMLA benefits and shall be due and payable to the City within six (6) months of return to work or upon termination.

Retirees may elect to continue coverage with the group medical and dental plans at retiree’s cost.

Employees who are covered for medical benefits through a spouse’s other alternative medical insurance may elect not to enroll in a City group medical plan and are not 54 of 331
14 eligible for the City's contribution towards medical, dental and vision premiums as identified in this Section. Employees electing this option shall provide proof of medical coverage to the City. In lieu of medical insurance premiums, the City will pay the employee who waives coverage, the amount of $350 per month. Employees may elect to receive this payment in cash, paid directly to the employee in their normal paycheck, or to have this amount deposited into the employee’s deferred compensation account.

Approval for the deferred compensation option is subject to acceptance of satisfactory certification of spousal or other alternative medical coverage by the Human Resources Department. Retirees may elect to continue coverage with the group medical plan.

The City will contribute to PERS health insurance premiums, for retirees who were covered by this compensation and benefits plan at the time of their retirement and are enrolled in a PERS health plan, and for employees participating in the City’s cafeteria plan described above, an amount equal to the City's basic employer contribution for health premiums which City Council Resolution No. 2279-02 set as the minimum required under PEMHCA.

B. Life Insurance:

The City shall provide life insurance coverage for unrepresented employees as follows:
$100,000 for life insurance, and $100,000 for accidental death or dismemberment.

Supplemental life insurance is also available, the cost of which shall be borne by the employee.

C. Deferred Compensation Plan (for Department Heads and Management Only) The City shall contribute one hundred dollars ($100.00) per month ($46.15 per pay period) to a pre-tax 401(a) Deferred Compensation Plan. The specific groupings/divisions of management classifications shall be defined at plan inception and shall be based upon criteria stated in the Deferred Compensation Plan. The option to opt out is currently irreversible and can take place only when an employee is hired/promoted to a management-level classification. If an employee opts out of plan entirely, he/she will not receive said benefit.

All details of the Deferred Compensation Plan will be consistent with the requirements of the plan provider.

D. Disability Insurance:

Both Short-Term Disability (STD) and Long-Term Disability (LTD) Insurance programs are available. Participation in the Short-Term and Long-Term Disability Plans is not optional.
55 of 331
15 E. California Government VEBA or CALGOVEBA (For Department Heads Only)
The City will contribute a monthly pre-tax employer contribution of $200.00 per month or $92.31 pay period toward the CalVEBA 501(C)9 Trust pursuant to the agreement attached as Exhibit A as may be amended from time to time pursuant to the requirements of such agreement. Department Head employees will be subject to the provisions of such agreement as may be revised.

SECTION 6.00 RETIREMENT BENEFITS (CalPERS)
A. Classic Members:

1. Pay and Reporting the Value of Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC)
The following provisions apply pursuant to Resolution No. 5885-22:

The City has identified the following conditions for the purpose of its election to pay and report the value of EPMC:
• This benefit shall apply to all Classic Miscellaneous Employees hired on or before November 29, 2010; and
• This benefit shall consist of paying 8% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same 8% percent of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation; and
The City has identified the following conditions for the purpose of its election to pay and report the value of EPMC:
• This benefit shall apply to all Classic Miscellaneous Employees hired on or after November 30, 2010; and
• This benefit shall consist of paying 7% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same 7% percent of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation; and
The City has identified the following conditions for the purpose of its election to pay and report the value of EPMC:
• This benefit shall apply to all Classic Safety Police Employees; and • This benefit shall consist of paying 9% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same 9% percent of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation. 56 of 331
16 Pursuant to Government Code Section 7522.34, the City does not pay and report the value of EPMC for new members as defined in Government Code Section 7522.04.

Consistent with its historical practice, the City pays the full share of the employee contributions to CalPERS and reports the payments as Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) on behalf of the CalPERS classic members. For classic members receiving benefits based on the 2.5% at 55 formula, these payments are equal to 8% of the member employees' reportable income. For classic members receiving payments based on the 2% at 60 formula, these payments are equal to 7% of the member employees’ reportable income.

1. Cost Sharing

2.5% at 55: Classic Members hired prior to November 30, 2010 are provided benefits under the CalPERS 2.5% at 55 retirement formula, with final compensation calculated based on the employee's highest earning year. Employee cost sharing will be 11%.vary based on Bargaining Group, with total cost sharing ranging from 9.5% - 11%. 2% at 60: Employees hired on or after November 30, 2010 are provided benefits under the CalPERS 2% at 60 retirement formula. Final compensation for these employees will be calculated based on the highest three-year average earnings. Employee cost sharing will be 10%vary based on Bargaining Group, with total cost sharing ranging from 8.5% - 10%.

This contribution may change based on the CalPERS valuation report, while additional cost sharing is negotiated by the City and various Bargaining Groups.

B. New Members
CalPERS new members hired by the City on or after January 1, 2013 are provided pension benefits using a 2.0% at 62 formula. New members are responsible for contributing to CalPERS as required by CalPERS law.

In addition to their required employee contribution, new members of Management are required to contribute 3% of the City’s contribution and new members of NonManagement are required to contribute 1.5% of the City’s contribution. As of the time this compensation plan is adopted, the total employee contribution is 10% for Department Heads and Management employees and 8.5% for Non-Management employees. This contribution will may increase change based on the CalPERS valuation report, while additional cost sharing is negotiated by the City and various Bargaining Groups. if the employee contribution rate for new members is increased above the current rate of 7%.

Specific Features of CalPERS Benefits
57 of 331
17 Specific features of the CalPERS benefits applicable to all employees hired prior to January 1, 2011 include:

Indexed Level of the 1959 Survivor Benefit as provided in Section 21574.5.

One-Year Fiscal Compensation as provided in Section 20042.

Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance as provided in Sections 21624, 21626 and 21628.

Benefits Payable to Surviving Spouse upon the death of an employee who qualified for retirement shall continue in full should the Spouse remarry as provided in Section 21551.

Continuation of Surviving Spouse-Benefits upon remarriage as provided in Section 21635.

Military Credit for time served in active military or merchant marine service prior to employment with the City as Public Service as provided in Section 21024, provided such cost of this enhancement be fully borne by the employee.

Sick Leave Credit as provided in Section 20965 for any unused sick leave days will be converted to service credit at the rate of 0.004 years of service for each day of sick leave provided there is less than 120 days between the member's separation date and retirement date.

Non-Industrial Disability pursuant to Section 21427, providing an annuity equal to 30% of final compensation with five years of service increasing 1% for each year in excess of five years to a maximum of 50% of final compensation.

One-time lump sum payout of $500 upon the death of a retiree paid to the retiree's survivor or retiree's estate pursuant to Section 21620.

COLA Adjustment of 2% beginning after the second calendar year after the year of retirement and each year thereafter provided the adjustment is not greater than the change in CPI-Section 21329.

Two Years Additional Service Credit to employees who retire within a specified period provided in Government Code Section 20903.

Members not covered by Social Security upon retirement shall receive a monthly allowance of $350, $700, or $840 depending on the number of eligible survivors as defined in Section 21573.
58 of 331
18 SECTION 7.00 EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT
For Management Employees Only:

When a management employee voluntarily, and with prior approval of the City Manager, undertakes any education or training program that will improve their skills and abilities in relation to the job, the City will reimburse the employee upon successful completion of the course for the cost of the course or training to a maximum of three thousand dollars ($3,000) per fiscal year, subject to an annual cap of nine thousand dollars ($9,000) per fiscal year on total educational reimbursements paid by the City for management employees where the employee identifies the total cost of the course up front. Where the class is of unusual value and cannot be scheduled during the employee's off hours, the employee may be excused at no loss of pay.

Employees may be reimbursed for more than one course per fiscal year or over the life of their employment with the City if total cost of all reimbursements does not exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000) per fiscal year. To qualify for reimbursement, employees shall submit written requests to the City Manager and requests shall be considered on a first come, first serve basis each fiscal year.

For Non-Management Employees Only:

When an employee voluntarily and with prior approval of their department head undertakes an education or training program that will improve their skills and abilities in relation to the job, the City will reimburse the employee upon successful completion of the course for the cost of the course or training. The reimbursement will be limited to an aggregate annual cap of $9,000 for all employees, to be distributed in accordance with City procedures. If the books are turned over to the City upon course completion, the City shall reimburse the employee for the costs of the books. Where the class is of unusual value and cannot be scheduled during the employee's off hours, the employee may be excused at no loss of pay. For purposes of this Section, costs incurred by employees for obtaining and maintaining professional certification or registration shall be reimbursable so long as conditions of approval and course completion are met.

SECTION 8.00 SEPARATION
Upon separation from the City or upon the start of an extended leave from City employment (e.g., military duty, etc.), employees shall receive cash payment on a pro-rated basis for unused Administrative Leave and Holiday Hours. Said payment(s) shall be based upon the employee's accrued Administrative Leave and Holiday hours and base salary rate at the time of separation or upon the start of an extended leave from City employment.

At that time, employees shall also receive full cash payment for any unused accrued vacation and administrative leave. Said payment shall be based upon the employee's base salary rate at time of separation or upon the start of an extended leave from City employment. However, employees 59 of 331
19 shall not receive cash payment for any unused accrued sick or floating holiday leave. All of the aforementioned separation payments, including additional monies owed from negotiated severance packages, shall be paid to employees within 14 calendar days after separation. 60 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.6
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Amending the Budget to Appropriate $10,000 From the Union Landing Property Improvement District Fund Towards Marketing and Promotion for the Sama-Sama Fest 2026 in Union Landing

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to appropriate $10,000 from the Union Landing Property Business Improvement District (PBID) Fund toward marketing and promotion for the 2026 Sama-Sama Fest at Union Landing.

The inaugural Sama-Sama Fest was held at Union Landing on October 11, 2025, and attracted more than 4,500 attendees from Union City and throughout the greater Bay Area. The event celebrates Filipino American culture, provides additional community programming, and brings visitors to Union Landing.

The 2026 event is anticipated to cost $31,000, with $21,000 currently committed through sponsorships and ULPOA funding, leaving a $10,000 funding shortfall. Staff has identified available PBID reserve funds as a potential non-General Fund source to help address the shortfall.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal C, Strategy 4: Enhance the City’s partnership with Union Landing property owners and tenants to grow the vitality of the business district and revenue to the City.

BACKGROUND
Sama-Sama Fest is a celebration of Filipino American culture, heritage, and community spirit. The event is inspired by the Filipino phrase Sama-Sama, meaning “together,” and is intended to bring Union City together to celebrate Filipino contributions, share cultural traditions, and strengthen community connections.
61 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.6
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 September 22, 2026 6 9 9
The inaugural Sama-Sama Fest was held on October 11, 2025, at Union Landing Shopping Center. The event was hosted by the Union Landing Property Owners Association (ULPOA), with Community Strong Strategies providing event organization and Moveable serving as the promoter and event producer.

The event was developed in part to provide additional community events for Union City residents, a priority identified by the City Council and the Mayor. The inaugural event attracted more than 4,500 attendees from Union City and throughout the greater Bay Area, including the Peninsula and Central Valley. (See Exhibit A.) The event featured merchandise and community organization booths, food trucks, and entertainment from Bay Area artists.

Due to the success of the inaugural event, ULPOA would like to host Sama-Sama Fest again on October 11, 2026. The 2026 event is anticipated to have $31,000 in production and operational costs.

At the annual ULPOA meeting held on September 3, 2026, Nathan Ulsh of Community Strong Strategies indicated that the ULPOA required additional funds to host the event in 2026.

Current funding commitments are as follows:

Table 1 – Funding Sources
Funding Source Amount
Fremont Bank $5,000
Kaiser Permanente $5,000
Alameda County $1,000
Union Landing Property Owners Association $10,000
Total Confirmed Funding $21,000
Remaining Funding Shortfall $10,000

DISCUSSION
Staff explored potential funding sources that would not require an allocation from the City's General Fund and identified available unappropriated reserve funds within the Union Landing PBID Fund as a potential source of support.

The Union Landing PBID supports activities and improvements that benefit the Union Landing commercial area, and permissible uses of funding from the Union Landing PBID Fund include marketing and promotions. As a regional power center and one of the City's most significant commercial destinations, Union Landing plays an important role in Union City's economic development strategy.

Special events at Union Landing can support both economic development and 62 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.6
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 September 22, 2026 6 9 9
community-building objectives by bringing residents and visitors to the center, increasing business activity, promoting Union Landing as a regional destination, and raising awareness of Union City among visitors from throughout the Bay Area.

Union Landing is also the City's largest generator of sales tax revenue, contributing more than $2.5 million annually to the City's General Fund. Supporting activities that increase visitation and strengthen Union Landing as a regional retail destination can therefore provide economic benefits to both the commercial district and the City.

The 2025 Sama-Sama Fest demonstrated its ability to attract significant attendance, with more than 4,500 attendees in its inaugural year.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed $10,000 would be drawn from available reserves in the Union Landing Property Improvement District fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to appropriate $10,000 from the Union Landing Property Improvement District Fund toward marketing and promotion for the Sama-Sama Fest 2026 in Union Landing.

Prepared by: Joan Malloy, City Manager
Submitted by: Joan Malloy, City Manager
Attachments

1. Draft Resolution
63 of 331
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AMENDING THE BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE $10,000 FROM THE

UNION LANDING PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND
TOWARDS MARKETING AND PROMOTION FOR THE 2026 SAMASAMA FEST AT UNION LANDING WHEREAS, the inaugural Sama-Sama Fest was held on October 11, 2025, at Union Landing Shopping Center. The event was hosted by the Union Landing Property Owners Association (ULPOA), with Community Strong Strategies providing event organization and Moveable serving as the promoter and event producer; and WHEREAS, the event was developed in part to provide additional community events for Union City residents, which is a priority identified by the City Council and Mayor; and
WHEREAS, the inaugural event attracted more than 4,500 attendees from Union City and throughout the greater Bay Area, including the Peninsula and Central Valley; and
WHEREAS, Union Landing is the City's largest generator of sales tax revenue, contributing more than $2.5 million annually to the City's General Fund; and WHEREAS, the Union Landing Property Owners’ Association (ULPOA) requires an additional $10,000 to host the 2026 Sama-Sama Fest; and WHEREAS, the City has available and unappropriated funding in available reserve funds within the Union Landing Property Improvement District Fund that can be used for marketing and promotion in Union Landing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to appropriate $10,000 from reserve funds in the Union Landing Property Improvement District Fund for marketing and promotion for Sama-Sama Fest 2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves an amendment to the budget to appropriate $10,000 from the Union Landing Property Improvement District (PBID) Fund for marketing and promotion for the 2026 Sama-Sama Fest.
64 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Sama-Sama Fest 2026 Funding

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on this September 22, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
65 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 4 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.7
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $61,650, for a Total Contract Amount of $135,850, for the Final Parcel Map for Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn), in the Amount of $61,650, for a total contract amount of $135,850, for the Final Parcel Map for Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal D, Strategy 1: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure - Continue the buildout of the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian network, with an emphasis on closing gaps, addressing safety concerns, and increasing connectivity to the Station District.

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

BACKGROUND
For the past several decades, a proposed roadway corridor between I-880 in Fremont and Mission Boulevard (Route 238) in Union City, parallel to Decoto Road, was sponsored and managed by Caltrans (Route 84 Corridor) and various Alameda County transportation agencies (East West Connector Project), most recently by the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC).

On March 22, 2018, Alameda CTC approved a request from the City of Union City to be 66 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.7
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 4 September 22, 2026 the project sponsor for the remaining phases of the East West Connector Project and to update the project description eligible for the remaining commitment from the 1986 Measure B Transportation Expenditure Plan
To better manage the project, the City divided the project into usable segments or phases that included Phase (Segment) 1: 7th Street Connection (7th Street to Mission Boulevard), Phase (Segment) 2: Gateway Connection (Old Alameda Creek to Alvarado-Niles Road), Phase (Segment) 3: 11th Street Connection (11th Street to 7th Street), Phase (Segment) 4: Alvarado-Niles Connection & Grade Separations (BART and Oakland Subdivision) and Phase (Segment) 5: Paseo Padre Parkway & Bike Trail Connection (Paseo Padre Parkway in Fremont to Old Alameda Creek in Union City).

The Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, is funded with 1986 Measure B funds, 2014 Measure BB funds, and other transportation funds administered by Alameda CTC.

On June 23, 2021, the California Transportation Commission approved Item 2.4d. (3), Action Item: the conveyance of excess Route 84 state-owned real property referred to as the Gateway Site to Union City, and on July 29, 2021, the City received the recorded Director’s Deed Grant transferring the excess state-owned real property to Union City.

On October 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No.2025-146 authorizing the dedication of city-owned land as right-of-way, landscape easement, and public utility easement for Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector) Project, City Project No. 18-04, and authorizing the City Manager to accept such dedication for the new Quarry Lakes Parkway, the realigned Quarry Lakes Drive, and a portion of the existing Alvarado-Niles Road.

Since the above City Council action and through the roadway design refinement, the rightof-way, landscape easement, and public utility easement on Quarry Lakes Parkway and Quarry Lakes Drive have been revised. In addition, Union City has been coordinating with BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) to secure a roadway easement for a portion of Lotus Pond Common at Alvarado-Niles Road to support a new signalized intersection, including a new sidewalk, street lighting, landscaping, and irrigation.

DISCUSSION
On May 15, 2026, the City and Kimley-Horn entered into a Consulting Services Agreement (C26PW1333) (Agreement) wherein Kimley-Horn will provide the City with professional/surveying services to prepare the Tentative Parcel Map for Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, in the amount of $74,200.

The purpose of the Tentative Parcel Map of the former Caltrans parcels bounded by Old Alameda Creek, Osprey Drive, Alvarado-Niles Road, and the Fremont City limits is to define the public rights-of-way for the new, realigned, and modified roadways and the property boundaries for the future residential development parcels. The map preparation included obtaining survey control and design geometrics from Phase 2 Design Consultant (Mark Thomas), performing meet-and-bound field surveys, and reviewing updated Title Reports.
67 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.7
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 4 September 22, 2026 On July 9, 2026, the BART Board of Directors approved the Grant of Roadway Easement to the City of Union City in the amount of $53,290 for Lotus Pond Common. In late August 2026, BART provided Union City with the Purchase Agreement for the Roadway Easement for review and comments before approval at an upcoming City Council meeting.

The draft Tentative Parcel Map No. 11643 dated September 2, 2026, identifies the public right-of-way, the landscaped easement, and the public utility easement for the new Quarry Lakes Drive, the realigned Quarry Lakes Parkway, and additional public right-of-way for a portion of Alvarado-Niles Road totaling about 26 acres (see Attachment 2).

The First Amendment to the Consulting Service Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. will allow the Consultant to revise the Parcel Map by performing additional boundary surveys, calculating the recent design refinements, and adding the recorded BART roadway easement after upcoming City Council approval The Final Parcel Map is scheduled to be approved and recorded by early 2027 as required by Alameda CTC Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector) Project Funding Agreement No. A22-0053, before Phase (Segment) 2 of Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, before construction funds can be approved for advertisement.

FISCAL IMPACT
The First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $61,650, will be funded with the Public Improvements Fund (Account Number 416-91804-57115) as budgeted in the approved Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 to Fiscal Year 2029-2030 for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $61,650, for a total contract amount of $135,850 for the Final Parcel Map for Phase (Segment) 2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04.

Prepared by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – First Amendment

2. Attachment 2 – Draft Tentative Parcel Map

3. Draft Resolution

4. Exhibit A- Director Deed (Caltrans site)
68 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.7
City Council Staff Report Page 4 of 4 September 22, 2026

5. Exhibit B- BART Roadway Easement Board Memo and Map
69 of 331

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT (C26PW1333)

BETWEEN THE CITY OF UNION CITY AND
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE FINAL MAP
QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-04
This First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) is effective as of this 22nd day of September, 2026, by and between the City of Union City, a municipal corporation, (“City”) and Kimley-Horn and Associates, ("Consultant"), collectively referred to as the "Parties."
W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, on May 15, 2026, the Parties entered into a Consulting Services Agreement (C26PW1333) (“Agreement”) wherein the Consultant will provide the City with professional/surveying services for the Quarry Lakes Tentative Map of the Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, in the amount of $74,200; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to expand the scope of services to be provided by the Consultant, extend the term, and increase the compensation to be provided to the Consultant; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant desire to enter into this First Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

1. The “SCOPE OF SERVICES”, as set forth in EXHIBIT A of the Agreement, is hereby amended to include the services contained in Exhibit A of this First Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. The “TERM OF SERVICES” as set forth in the first sentence of Section 1.1 of the Agreement, is hereby extended to June 30, 2027.

3. The first sentence of Section 2 “COMPENSATION” of the Agreement is hereby amended to reflect payment based upon a sum increase of Sixty-One Thousand Six Hundred Fifty Dollars ($61,650), as set forth in Exhibit B of this First Amendment. The total compensation under the Agreement including this Amendment shall not exceed a total contract amount of One Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars ($135,850). The first sentence shall now read:

City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed One Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars ($135,850), notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in 70 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Page 2 of 7 ends

Consultant's proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement.

4. The “COST PROPOSAL” as set forth in EXHIBIT B of the Agreement, is hereby amended to include the information contained in Exhibit B of this First Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

5. All other provisions of the Agreement, remain unchanged except as modified by this First Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Consultant have executed this Amendment effective as of the date hereinabove written.

THE CITY OF UNION CITY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

By By
Joan Malloy Mark Falgout, P.E.

City Manager Principal-in-Charge
Attest:
___________________________
Thai Nam N. Pham
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
____________________________
Kristopher J. Kokotaylo
City Attorney
71 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Page 3 of 7 ends

Exhibit A
Scope of Services
Task 1 – Supplemental Boundary Verification
Kimley-Horn will prepare, through the use of a sub-consultant, a supplemental field boundary verification for the project area. The record monumentation along the eastern boundary of the property, also being the boundary line with the City of Fremont, will be searched for and located to better establish what will be the eastern boundary of the future Parcel A. This task also includes searching for and locating any corners found along the western boundary of the property as depicted on Tract 2626 (Decoto Gardens) to verify the disposition of the improvements along the future Parcel D.

The survey along the eastern boundary will also include locating the existing fenceline line of the adjacent Purple Lotus Temple to verify the disposition of the of those improvements. The overhead utility poles along that line will also be located to determine their location with respect to the existing utility easements. This field effort includes 3 days of field surveying.

This task does not include topographic surveying, any mapping or setting any property corners or monuments or filing or recording a Record-of-Survey. The deliverable for this task will include one updated AutoCAD base file to be used as a background for the inprogress Tentative Map and later mapping documents.

Task 2 - Final Parcel Map
Kimley-Horn will prepare a Final Parcel Map from the approved tentative map and roadway improvement plans, by others to subdivide the existing property into 3 parcels and 1 street lots, including additional right-of-way dedications, existing right-of-way abandonment, public utility easements and landscape easements. The final Parcel Map will be based on the verified survey project boundary, approved Tentative Parcel Map and Conditions of Approval. A current title report (within 30 days of written notice to proceed) will be provided by the client.

Kimley-Horn will assemble and submit a completed Parcel Map submittal package to the City. This includes pertinent reference information such as deeds, maps, easements, traverse closure reports and non-interference/approval letters from utility agencies serving the property. Kimley-Horn will include in the submittal the documentation that was gathered as part of the boundary verification task under the original contract, along with other available public records, such as maps and documents from the City, County, CalTrans, and title company. Additional documentation may include copies of Tract Maps, Parcel Maps, Records of Survey Maps, Corner Records, Centerline Ties, Certificate of Corrections, Right-of-way maps, Deeds, Street and Public Utility easements, and encumbrance documents listed in the Title Report provided by the client. This includes 72 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Page 4 of 7 ends

records for the property in question and the immediate surrounding adjacent parcels.

The final map will consist of the following 18” x 26” sheets:

1. One title sheet for statements, certifications, signatures and notary acknowledgments including stamps from appropriate surveyors and engineers required to sign the map. Additional sheets for notary signatures as may be necessary.

2. Boundary resolution sheet indicating found monumentation; boundary establishment notes, record map titles with lot/parcel designations; street rightsof-way with names; boundary and parcel lines; measured and record dimensions for centerlines, boundary and existing property lines; existing easements with reference recording information; proposed easements; survey notes including basis of bearings, record maps, deed references, property areas (net & gross), set and found monument descriptions. Additional sheets as necessary for detail and clarity.

3. One Index sheet noting sheet numbers for location of parcels, easements, details and vicinity map if necessary.

4. Parcel Sheets drafted at 30’ to 40’ scale for proposed property lines, rights-of-way, easement dedications, open space, landscape, basins, common areas and reserved lots. Information shown will detail property line dimensions, centerline and right-of-way line dimensions, parcel numbers, easement identification and dimensions, street names and lot designations, indication of restricted access or driveway access locations.

This task includes Coordination with client, title company, public agencies and subconsultants for completion of tasks listed and noted deliverables.

Task 3 – Monumentation
Kimley-Horn will set or replace any property corner monuments, or offsets thereof, to establish the boundary of the subject property and newly created Parcel corners. There are an estimated 26 monuments required to be set for the existing boundary and current Parcel configuration.

Monuments set for centerline and Right-of-Way of proposed street improvements are not included and will be deferred to after roadway is constructed under the General Contractor services. No centerline ties are included due to completion of improvements construction would be required prior to setting survey tie markers.

Information and Responsibilities of Client
Kimley-Horn (consultant) shall be entitled to rely on the completeness and accuracy of all information provided by the Client or the Client’s consultants or representatives. The 73 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Page 5 of 7 ends

Client shall provide all information requested by Kimley-Horn during the project, including but not limited to the following:
• Preliminary Title report dated within 30 days of written notice to proceed • Approved tentative map and improvement plans.
• Vesting Deed with articles of incorporation for entity signing as owner(s).

In addition to other responsibilities set out in this Agreement, the Client shall sign any appropriate application and pay all agency fees, recording fees and any title company fees.

Deliverables
Kimley-Horn (consultant) will provide one set of electronic Parcel Map sheets (PDF format) for review and comment by City, Client, and title company. A final mylar copy, stamped and signed by a licensed Land Surveyor for recording with Recorders Office.

Client or Title Company will be responsible for recording fees and processing with Recorders Office.

Schedule
We will provide our services as expeditiously as practicable with the goal of meeting a mutually agreeable schedule. Typically, this type of project is delivered 6-8 weeks from notice to proceed.

Services Not Included
• Any other services, including but not limited to the following, are not included in this Agreement:
• Utility research and coordination. Approval and Non-interference letters from utility companies to be provided by client.

Submittals including Application, Articles of Incorporation, Title information, Utility Provider letters and approvals will be provided by client and consultant. Any application, plan check or recording fees including notary services to be paid and processed by client. 74 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Page 6 of 7 ends

Project Location
75 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Page 7 of 7 ends

Exhibit B
Cost Proposal

Task 1 - Supplemental Boundary Verification $18,650
Task 2 – Final Parcel Map $31,500
Task 3 – Monumentation $11,500
Total Additional Fee: _____ $ 61,650
Hourly Labor Rate Schedule
Supplemental Boundary Verification, Final Parcel Map, and Monumentation
Staff Rate Hrs Fee
Sr Prof II 380 22 $ 8,360.00
Sr Prof I 340 48 $ 16,320.00
Sr Tech Support 250 87 $ 21,750.00
157 $ 46,430.00
Sub-Consultant Survey Fee (Northstar) $ 15,220.00
Total Fee $ 61,650.00
Effective through June 30, 2027
Subject to annual adjustment thereafter
Internal Reimbursable Expenses will be charged at 5% of Labor Billings External Reimbursable Expenses will be charged at 15% mark-up, or per the Contract Sub-Consultants will be billed per the Contract
76 of 331

STARLING
DRIVE

ALVARADO-NILES RD

PERRY RD

BART RAIL
MISSION BLVD (STATE ROUTE 238)

ALAMEDA CREEK

QUARRY LAKES

MANN AV

DECOTO RD

PASEO PADRE PKWY

CLOVER RD

OSPREY DR

HOLLYHOCK ST
7TH ST
11TH ST

KING AV

GURDWARA RD GRAU DR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF UNION CITY DRAFT

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 11643
FOR

THE CITY OF UNION CITY

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CA
OWNER
CITY OF UNION CITY, C.O. MARILOU AYUPAN, PE
34009 ALVARADO-NILES ROAD
UNION CITY, CA 94587
[email protected]
510.675.5306

CIVIL ENGINEER

DJ EDWARDS, PE
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
303 S ALMADEN BLVD, SUITE 700
SAN JOSE, CA 95110
[email protected]
408.785.3590

SURVEYOR

MICHAEL JOHNSON, PLS
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
3801 UNIVERSITY AVE, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
[email protected]
951.588.9866

ROADWAY DESIGN

JARED MURPHY

MARK THOMAS
1970 BROADWAY, SUITE 760
OAKLAND, CA 94512
510.844.5600
ADDRESS: 35075 ALVARADO-NILES RD; 35261 ALVARADO-NILES RD; 35199 PERRY RD, 34929 OSPREY DR, UNION CITY, CA 94587

PARCEL ADDRESSES HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM THE UNION CITY GIS PORTAL APN: 087-0011-015-14, 015-15, -016-03, -017-06, -017-07, 087-0004-019-01; 087-0095-119-00
SITE AREA: ±2,008,242 SF/±46.10 AC
EXISTING ZONING: OPEN SPACE, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL*** SPECIFIC PLAN: STATION DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN, GATEWAY SUB-AREA PROPOSED ZONING: NO CHANGE
EXISTING USE: RESIDENTIAL, FLOOD CONTROL AND PUBLIC USES PROPOSED USE: NO CHANGE
FLOOD ZONE: ZONE X

AB - AGGREGATE BASE

AC - ASPHALT CONCRETE, ACRE

AD - AREA DRAIN

AHJ - AUTHORITY HAVING

JURISDICTION

ARCH - ARCHITECTURAL

ASPH - ASPHALT CONCRETE

BFP - BACKFLOW PREVENTER

BGL - BOTTOM OF GRAVEL LAYER

BM - BENCHMARK

BMP - BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

BLDG - BUILDING

BW - BACK OF WALK

BS - BOTTOM OF STAIR

CB - CATCH BASIN

CITY - UNION CITY

C/L - CENTERLINE

CO - CLEANOUT

COMM - COMMUNICATION

CONC - CONCRETE

CY - CUBIC YARD

DI - DRAIN INLET

DIP - DUCTILE IRON PIPE

DMA - DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA

DS - DOWNSPOUT

DTL - DETAIL

DW - DOMESTIC WATER

DWG - DRAWING

E - EAST

EC - END OF CURVE

EG - EXISTING GRADE

ELEC - ELECTRIC

ESMT - EASEMENT

EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT

EX - EXISTING

FDC - FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

FF - FINISHED FLOOR

FG - FINISHED GRADE

FH - FIRE HYDRANT

FL - FLOW LINE

FS - FINISHED SURFACE

FW - FIRE WATER

GB - GRADE BREAK

GI - GREASE INTERCEPTOR

HDPE - HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE

HP - HIGH POINT

IMP - INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT

PRACTICE

INV - INVERT

IRR - IRRIGATION WATER

JB - JUNCTION BOX

LF - LINEAR FEET

LP - LOW POINT

MAX - MAXIMUM

MEP - MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL /

PLUMBING

MIN - MINIMUM

MH - MANHOLE

N - NORTH
NO. - NUMBER
N.T.S. - NOT TO SCALE
O.C. - ON CENTER
O.C.E.W - ON CENTER EACH WAY

PCC - PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

PIV - POST INDICATOR VALVE

P/L - PROPERTY LINE

POC - POINT OF CONNECTION

PUE - PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

PVC - POLYVINYL CHLORIDE

R - RIDGE, RADIUS

REF - REFER TO

RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

RW - RECLAIMED WATER

R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY

S - SEWER, SOUTH

SD - STORM DRAIN

SF - SQUARE FEET
SPPWC - "GREENBOOK" STANDARD PLANS

FOR PUBLIC WORKS

CONSTRUCTION

STA - STATION

STD - STANDARD

SS - SANITARY SEWER
SSPWC - "GREENBOOK" STANDARD

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC

WORKS CONSTRUCTION

SSWR - SANITARY SEWER

SW - SIDEWALK

T - TELEPHONE, TRANSFORMER

TC - TOP OF CURB

TCM - TREATMENT CONTROL MEASURE

TEMP - TEMPORARY

TG - TOP OF GRATE

TGL - TOP OF GRAVEL LAYER

TS - TOP OF STAIR

TSL - TOP OF SOIL LAYER

TW - TOP OF WALL

TYP - TYPICAL

VIF - VERIFY IN FIELD

W - WATER, WEST
XX.XX - PROPOSED ELEVATION
(XX.XX) - EXISTING ELEVATION

TYPICAL ABBREVIATIONS

SITE INFORMATION

PROJECT TEAM
BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE III, NAD83 (EPOCH 1991.35). ALL MEASURED DISTANCES SHOWN ARE US SURVEY FOOT GRID DISTANCES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE GRID DISTANCES BY A COMBINATION FACTOR OF 1.0000652.

BASIS OF BEARINGS

WATER SERVICE

ALAMEDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
43885 S. GRIMMER BLVD
FREMONT, CA 94538
510-668-4200

SEWER SERVICE

UNION SANITARY DISTRICT
5072 BENSON RD
UNION CITY, CA 94587
510-477-7500

FIRE PROTECTION

ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
6363 CLARK AVE
DUBLIN, CA 94568
925-833-3473 EXT. 1210

GAS & ELECTRIC SERVICE
PG&E
300 LAKESIDE DR, SUITE 210
OAKLAND, CA 94612
1-877-660-6789

STORM DRAIN SERVICE

UNION CITY
34009 ALVARADO-NILES ROAD
UNION CITY, CA 94587
510-471-3232

UTILITY PURVEYORS

SITE MAP

NORTH PROJECT DESCRIPTION
REALIGN QUARRY LAKES DRIVE AND QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY; CREATE PARCELS FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, A PUBLIC PARK, AND A WATER QUALITY BASIN.

VICINITY MAP
NORTH

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT
SITE

ALVARADO NILES RD

QUARRY LAKES DR

LOTUS POND COMMON COVER SHEET
C1.0

OSPREY DR

SHEET INDEX
SHEET NO. SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE
1 C1.0 COVER SHEET
2 C2.0 EXISTING PARCELS
3 C3.0 LOTTING PLAN
4 C3.1 SECTIONS
5 C3.2 PROPOSED PARCEL BOUNDARIES
6 C3.3 PROPOSED EASEMENTS
77 of 331

62.92ft

55.52ft 59.62ft

65.73ft

64.52ft

55.84ft

69.50ft

62.85ft

56.52ft

59.79ft

53.73ft

53.86ft

54.66ft

59.37ft

58.43ft

56.69ft

54.53ft

54.54ft

54.34ft

53.06ft

52.76ft

53.93ft

51.34ft

50.90ft

50.38ft 49.99ft 50.28ft

49.71ft

49.33ft

48.87ft

48.98ft 50.30ft

49.92ft

50.26ft

50.59ft

50.67ft

50.73ft

50.62ft

50.88ft

51.31ft

52.25ft

52.23ft 52.08ft

51.93ft

51.90ft

57.94ft

55.86ft

58.53ft

54.45ft 58.85ft

59.06ft

54.67ft 54.84ft 56.17ft

55.70ft 56.36ft 57.57ft

52.38ft 53.73ft

55.47ft

57.12ft

71.37ft

71.09ft

72.71ft 73.31ft

57.62ft

60.21ft

68.56ft

55.23ft

57.16ft

63.67ft

70.91ft

54.60ft

58.82ft

55.90ft

60.18ft

56.18ft

58.42ft

64.51ft

71.15ft

55.32ft

58.48ft

64.84ft

69.97ft

63.36ft

64.55ft

67.35ft

72.25ft

71.89ft

65.57ft

63.99ft

73.18ft

73.04ft

63.49ft 63.11ft

73.88ft

73.56ft

73.73ft

71.46ft

63.14ft 63.35ft

74.31ft

74.46ft

74.48ft

67.89ft

64.81ft

75.05ft

75.24ft

73.80ft

66.79ft

65.22ft

76.02ft

75.57ft

75.02ft

71.92ft

67.66ft

66.20ft

76.58ft 76.65ft

73.83ft

67.97ft

66.54ft

76.97ft

69.96ft

65.60ft

64.92ft

77.54ft

75.68ft

70.44ft

67.37ft

62.74ft

72.50ft

69.45ft

64.56ft

59.65ft

61.76ft

66.97ft

63.42ft

59.24ft

54.61ft

56.17ft

61.13ft

56.06ft

53.79ft

51.02ft

54.48ft

51.45ft

51.61ft
55 60
51 51
52 52
52 53
53 53
54 56
57 58
59 61
62 62
25 30
35 40
45 21
21 22
22 23
23 23
24 24
24 26
27 28
29 31
32 33 34
37 36 39
38 42
41 44
43 47
46 49 48
4849
49 STOP STOP
N25°26'48"W 34.67'
N16°20'59"E 124.85'
N76°40'52"E 34.21'
N73°42'00"W 60.00' 99.99' N16°20'59"EN73°42'00"W 29.86' N16°18'00"E 162.14' N73°41'16"W 50.52' 95.56' N16°18'00"E
R=329.98' ∆=63°38'45" L=36 .5 '
N16°17'40"E 750.24'
N16°18'27"E 84.94'
N49°53'02"W 118.06'
N11°03'04"E
114.75'
R=2036.87' ∆=19°47'45" L=703.74' N16°05'23"E 1066.32'
N73°58'54"W 325.01'
N53°56'53"W 621.43'
N56°05'45"W 190.59'
N33°52'39"E 48.52' N66°04'51"W 416.72'
N62°40'48"W 312.47'
N16°17'40"E 258.19' N16°17'40"E 138.46'
N34°40'00"E 189.06'
N87°01'46"W 138.15'
N56°03'29"W 172.19'
N73°39'01"W 425.42'
N69°56'33"W 736.87'
N76°58'23"W 330.02'
N82°17'07"E 309.59'
N2°01'09"E 195.57' (TIE)
N69°15'58"W 431.03'
N73°42'00"W

93.00'
N66°22'29"E 138.22' N73°41'01"W

71.03'
N61°11'55"W
122.28' (TIE)
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK IN
WELL
(NO STAMP)
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK IN
WELL
(NO STAMP)
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK IN
WELL
(NO STAMP)
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK IN
WELL
(NO STAMP)
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS

DISK IN WELL
STAMPED RCE 21001
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK

IN WELL
(NO STAMP)
FOUND 1/8"

BRASS PIN IN
CONC
(NO STAMP)

BART PROPERTY
APN 087-0011-018-03
RE42743 IM 431 (PCL. 31)
N.A.P.O.T.S.

FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK

IN WELL
(NO STAMP)
N16°17'40"E 240.93'
PARCEL 1
(REEL 2743, IMAGE 431)
APN 087-0011-017-06
RE 2743 IM 431
APN 87-11-15-3
A.C.W.D. CITY OF UNION CITY
N.A.P.O.T.S.

PARCEL 3
APN 087-0011-015-15
RE 2743 IM 431
APN 501-1800-001-50
CITY OF FREMONT RE 5481 IM 104 (78-131972)
N.A.P.O.T.S.

PARCEL 2
TRACK 2626 (49 M 69-71)
APN 087-0011-016-03
PARCEL 5
TRACK 3835 (95 M 89)
APN 087-0095-119-00

PARCEL B
DOC. 1981-162635
APN 507-0030-013-01, N.A.P.O.T.S.

PARCEL A
DOC. 1981-162635
APN 507-0030-013-02, N.A.P.O.T.S.

TRACT MAP 7420
299 M 68
LOT 1, N.A.P.O.T.S.

PARCEL 4A
TRACK 2626 (49 M 69-71

CITY OF UNION CITY
APN 087-0004-019-01
RE 2250 IM 784
PARCEL 3
REEL 2743 IMAGE 431
APN 087-0011-015-14
RE 2743 IM 431
PARCEL 1
APN 087-0011-017-07
RE 2743 IM 431
LOT 125
PARCEL 4B
TRACK 2626 (49 M 69-71)
N.A.P.O.T.S.

TRACK 3835
95 M 88
N6°02'35"W 27.03'

ALVARADO NILES ROAD

GRACKLE
COURT

TOWEE COURT
OSPREY

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY OF FREMONT

CITY OF UNION CITY

EXISTING STREET EASEMENT
(DOC. 85-209422) TO BE ABANDONED

BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT

SKYLARK DRIVE

PERRY ROAD
OLD

ALAMEDA
CREEK
15' EXISTING PATH EASEMENT
EASEMENT DEED (DOC 20002371968)
R/W

KINGLET
COURT

EXISTING PG&E POLE LINE
EASEMENT (2293 O.R. 348)

6.0' EXISTING 20' PT&T ESMT
(8147 O.R. 371)

20.0' 44.9' EXISTING ESMT TO

BE TERMINATED

WITH FEE TRANSFER
DRIVE
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK

IN WELL
(NO STAMP)

CITY OF FREMONT

CITY OF FREMONT
PORTION OF EXISTING 15 FT PATH

EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED BY

SEPARATE EASEMENT

EXTERIOR PROPERTY LINE
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP BOUNDARY)

PROPOSED PARCEL LINE

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

RECORDED RIGHT OF WAY

RECORDED EASEMENT

EXISTING BUILDING
LEGEND

ALVARADO OSPREY

11.68'

1.88'
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS

DISC IN WELL (NO
STAMP)

ADJACENT PARCEL LINE

EXISTING CREEK FLOW LINE

AREA TO BE ACQUIRED IN FEE

MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED
FOUND 2-1/2" BRASS DISC IN

WELL (NO STAMP) (NO RECORD)
SET 3/4" X 18" IRON PIPE

STAMPED LS XXXX

BOUNDARY LINE NODE

EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINE

EXISTING FENCE LINE

AC ACRES

AE ACCESS EASEMENT

LE LANDSCAPE EASEMENT
N.A.P.O.T.S. NOT A PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION

PAE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT

PT&T PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH

COMPANY

ROW RIGHT OF WAY

SQFT SQUARE FEET

ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING PARCELS
PARCEL NAME APN NO. PARCEL GROSS AREA *
1 087-0011-017-06 286,569
1 087-0011-017-07 357,979
2 087-0011-016-03 208,223
3 087-0011-015-14 521,694
3 087-0011-015-15 296,019
4A 087-004-019-01 130,981
5 087-0095-119-00 43,412
CITY RIGHT OF WAY 163,365
TOTAL 2,008,242
*NOTE: EXISTING PARCEL AREAS FOR PARCELS 1-5 ARE PER ASSESSOR PARCEL MAP.

CITY ROW AREA IS THE TOTAL AREA MINUS THE EXISTING PARCEL AREAS. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF UNION CITY DRAFT

SEE DETAIL A
C2.0EXISTING PARCELS
NORTH

DETAIL A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF UNION CITY, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL 1:

ALL THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN STATE PARCEL NO. 39259 FROM WILLIAM A. EATON AND VERA B. EATON, HIS WIFE; AUBREY H. JOHNSON AND LOUISE C. JOHNSON, HIS WIFE TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1970 IN REEL 2551, IMAGE 770, IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY; DESCRIBED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS:
"BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 2735, LEADING FROM ALVARADO TO NILES, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 70° 49' EAST, 25.06 FEET FROM THE POINT OF INTERSECTION THEREOF, WITH THE EASTERN BOUNDARY LINE OF THE 369.82 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM JONAS G. CLARK TO EDWARD F. DYER, DATED DECEMBER 1, 1888, RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1889, IN BOOK 364, OF DEEDS, PAGE 407, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 15°15' WEST ALONG A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH SAID BOUNDARY LINE AND DISTANT AT RIGHT ANGLES, 25 FEET EASTERLY THEREFROM, 1156.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82°14' EAST, 202.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77°32' EAST 172.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°16' EAST, 396.90 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERN BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM JONAS G. CLARK TO JOHN H.

PETERSON, DATED NOVEMBER 5, 1884, RECORDED DECEMBER 1, 1884, IN BOOK 278, OF DEEDS, PAGE 368, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 15°15' EAST ALONG SAID WESTERN BOUNDARY LINE, 957.30 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERN LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 2735; AND THENCE NORTH 70°49' WEST ALONG SAID LAST NAMED LINE, 737.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

BEING A PORTION OF THE 49.90 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED BY JONAS G. CLARK TO JOHN C.

WHIPPLE, BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 5, 1884, RECORDED DECEMBER 1, 1884, IN BOOK 279 OF DEEDS, PAGE 186, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM: THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE CITY OF UNION CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DATED MARCH 21, 1969, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1969, REEL 2392, IMAGE 825, OFFICIAL RECORDS, INSTRUMENT NO. 47642." AND ALL THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN STATE PARCEL NO. 34410 FROM THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED DECEMBER 3, 1970 IN REEL 2743, IMAGE 431, IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY; DESCRIBED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS:
"COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED BY J. G.

CLARK TO JOHN ROCK BY DEED DATED OCTOBER 21, 1884 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 278 OF DEEDS, PAGE 204, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 15°01' EAST ALONG THE LINE OF SAID ROCK'S LAND 1487.06 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE WESTERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE ALONG LAST LINE NORTH 46°08' WEST

21.75 FEET TO THE SOUTHERN LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 2735 LEADING FROM NILES TO ALVARADO; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD NORTH 71° WEST 790.83 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION THEREOF WITH THE EASTERN BOUNDARY LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED BY J. G. CLARK TO JOHN C. WHIPPLE BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 5, 1884, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 279 OF DEEDS, PAGE 186, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE OF SAID WHIPPLE'S LAND SOUTH 15°15' WEST 1256.86 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF ALAMEDA CREEK; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF SAID CREEK, SOUTH 55° EAST 865.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT.

BEING A PORTION OF THE RANCHO ARROYO DE LA ALAMEDA.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM HARRIET J.

OLSON, TO RIO GRAVEL INC., A CORPORATION, DATED JANUARY 10, 1959, RECORDED JANUARY 19, 1959, IN BOOK 8906 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, PAGE 203."

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS PARCEL ONE,

PARCEL TWO AND PARCEL THREE IN THE DEED FROM SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED DECEMBER 3, 1970, IN REEL 2743, IMAGE 431 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN STATE PARCEL NO.

DD-034410-02-02 FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT RECORDED NOVEMBER 5, 1974, IN VOL. 3809, PAGE 325 OF OFFICIAL

RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, AND
AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN STATE PARCEL NO.

DD-034410-02-01 FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO THE CITY OF UNION CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RECORDED AUGUST 28, 1974, IN VOL. 3763, PAGE 701 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY.APNS: 087-0011-017-07, 087-0011-017-06, 087-0011-015-14 AND 087-0011-015-15
PARCEL 2:

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY MOST CORNER OF LOT 198 OF TRACT 2626 AS SHOWN ON MAP THEREOF, FILED NOVEMBER 10, 1964, IN BOOK 49 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 69 TO 71, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ALAMEDA COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 74“ 50 40” EAST, 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15“ 09 32” WEST, 104.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82“ 08 32” EAST, 202.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77“ 26 32” EAST, 172.04 FEET; SOUTH 73“ 21 28” EAST, 397.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15“ 09 32” WEST, 299.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55“ 06 48” WEST, 102.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78“ 07' 287.66 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM, ANY PORTION THEREOF WHICH MAY LIE WITHIN THE LINES OF SAID LOT 198.

PARCEL 3:

BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK C AS SAID BLOCK IS SHOWN ON THE ’’MAP OF THE CALIFORNIA NURSERY COMPANY, SUBDIVISION NO. 1, SITUATED IN RANCHO ARROYO DE LA ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CAL.” FILED MAY 9, 1921 IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS, PAGE 82 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 16’05’26” WEST 234.99 (234.97) FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION THEREOF WITH THE SOUTHWESTERN LINE OF THE 80 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE WESTERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 74’14’40” WEST, 13.52 (13.52) FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1970.00 (1969.87) FEET, FROM WHICH A RADIAL BEARS NORTH 16’25’43” EAST; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1970.00 (1969.87) FEET, THRU A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12’15’59”, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 421.76 (421.73) FEET; THENCE NORTH 49’52’59” WEST 293.79 (293.77) FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11’03’07” WEST, 114.78 (114.77) FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 2037.00 (2036.86) FEET WHICH IS CONCENTRIC WITH THE AFORE DESCRIBED CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1970.00 (1969.87) FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 2037.00 FEET, THRU A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19’47’52”, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 703.86 (703.81) FEET TO THE AFORESAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK ”C”; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 16’05’26” EAST 67.11 (67.11) FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL 4:

PARCEL A:

PORTION OF LOT 198 AS SAID LOT IS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF TRACT 2626, FILED NOVEMBER 10, 1964 IN BOOK 49 OF MAPS, PAGES 69 TO 71, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER OF SAID LOT 198; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERN LINE THEREOF THE 3 FOLLOWING COURSES: (1) NORTH 15’ 12 EAST 131.00 FEET (2) NORTH 21’ 09 33 EAST 202.27 FEET (3) NORTH 15’ 12 EAST 31.81 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74’ 50 40 EAST 424.14 FEET TO THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED LINE THE 3 FOLLOWING COURSES: (1) NORTH 75’ 32 EAST 34.21 FEET; (2) NORTH 26’ 35 40 WEST 110.88 FEET; (3) NORTH 15’ 09 20 EAST 287.66 FEET TO THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED LINE NORTH 74’ 50 40 WEST 290.29 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE GENERAL WESTERN LINE OF SAID LOT THE 5 FOLLOWING COURSES: (1) SOUTH 15’ 09 20 WEST 162.00 FEET (2) NORTH 74’ 50 40 WEST 29.58 FEET; (3) SOUTH 15’ 12 WEST 100.00 FEET; (4) NORTH 74’ 50 40 WEST 60.00 FEET; (5) SOUTH 15’ 12 WEST 125.29 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL 5:

LOT 190, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED TRACT 3835, RECORDED ON JUNE 29, 1977, IN BOOK 95 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 88 THRU 92, OFFICIAL RECORDS, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. APN:
087—0011 —017—07 (PORTION OF PARCEL 1), 087—0011—017—06 (PORTION OF PARCELl 1), 087—0011—015—14 (PORTION OF PARCEL 1) and 087-0011-015-15 (PORTION OF PARCEL 1); 087-0011-016-03 (PARECEL 2); 087-0011-018-03(PARCEL 3); 087-0004-019-01 (PARCEL A of PARCEL 4), 087—0004—019—04 (PARCELl B of PARCEL 4) and 087—0095—119 (PARCELl 5). 78 of 331

62.92ft

55.52ft 59.62ft

65.73ft

64.52ft

55.84ft

69.50ft

62.85ft

56.52ft

59.79ft

53.73ft

53.86ft

54.66ft

59.37ft

58.43ft

56.69ft

54.53ft

54.54ft

54.34ft

53.06ft

52.76ft

53.93ft

51.34ft

50.90ft

50.38ft 49.99ft

50.28ft

49.71ft

49.33ft

48.87ft

48.98ft 50.30ft

49.92ft

50.26ft

50.59ft

50.67ft

50.73ft

50.62ft

50.88ft

51.31ft

52.25ft

52.23ft 52.08ft

51.93ft

51.90ft

57.94ft

55.86ft

58.53ft

54.45ft

58.85ft

59.06ft

54.67ft 54.84ft 56.17ft

55.70ft 56.36ft 57.57ft

52.38ft 53.73ft

55.47ft 57.12ft

71.37ft

71.09ft

72.71ft 73.31ft

51.95ft

52.18ft

52.06ft

52.66ft

52.67ft

52.10ft

53.09ft

52.87ft

52.53ft

53.79ft

53.25ft

52.74ft

54.24ft 54.02ft

54.56ft

54.71ft

54.70ft

57.62ft

60.21ft

68.56ft

55.23ft

57.16ft

63.67ft

70.91ft

54.60ft

58.82ft

55.90ft

60.18ft

56.18ft

58.42ft

64.51ft

71.15ft

55.32ft

58.48ft

64.84ft

69.97ft

63.36ft

64.55ft

67.35ft

72.25ft

71.89ft

65.57ft

63.99ft

73.18ft

73.04ft

63.49ft 63.11ft

73.88ft

73.56ft

73.73ft

71.46ft

63.35ft 63.14ft

74.31ft

74.46ft

74.48ft

67.89ft

64.81ft

75.05ft

75.24ft

73.80ft

66.79ft

65.22ft

76.02ft

75.57ft

75.02ft

71.92ft

67.66ft

66.20ft

76.58ft 76.65ft

73.83ft

67.97ft

66.54ft

76.97ft

69.96ft

65.60ft

64.92ft

77.54ft

75.68ft

70.44ft

67.37ft

62.74ft

72.50ft

69.45ft

64.56ft

59.65ft

61.76ft

66.97ft

63.42ft

59.24ft

54.61ft

56.17ft

61.13ft

56.06ft

53.79ft

51.02ft

54.48ft

51.45ft

51.61ft
55 60
51 51
52 52
52 53
53 53
54 56
57 58
59 61
62 62
25 30
35 40
45 21
21 22
22 23
23 23
24 24
24 26 27 28
29 31 32 33 34 37 36 39
38 42
41 44
43 47
46 49 48
4849
49 STOP STOP
STOP

STOP STOP
N25°26'48"W 34.67'
N16°20'59"E 124.85'
N76°40'52"E 34.21'
N73°42'00"W 60.00' 99.99' N16°20'59"EN73°42'00"W 29.86' N16°18'00"E 162.14' N73°41'16"W 50.52' 95.56' N16°18'00"E
R=329.98' ∆=63°38'45" L=36 .5 '
N16°17'40"E 750.24'
N16°18'27"E 84.94'
N49°53'02"W 118.06'
N11°03'04"E
114.75'
R=2036.87' ∆=19°47'45" L=703.74' N16°05'23"E 1066.32'
N73°58'54"W 325.01'
N53°56'53"W 621.43'
N56°05'45"W 190.59'
N33°52'39"E 48.52' N66°04'51"W 416.72'
N62°40'48"W 312.47'
N16°17'40"E 258.19' N16°17'40"E 138.46'
N34°40'00"E 189.06'
N87°01'46"W 138.15'
N56°03'29"W 172.19'
N73°39'01"W 425.42'
N69°56'33"W 736.87'
N76°58'23"W 330.02'
N82°17'07"E 309.59'
N2°01'09"E 195.57' (TIE)
N69°15'58"W 431.03'
N73°42'00"W

93.00'
N66°22'29"E 138.22' N73°41'01"W

DISK IN WELL
STAMPED RCE 21001
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK

IN WELL
(NO STAMP)
FOUND 1/8"

BRASS PIN IN
CONC
(NO STAMP)

BART PROPERTY
APN 087-0011-018-03
RE42743 IM 431 (PCL. 31)
N.A.P.O.T.S.

FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK

IN WELL
(NO STAMP)
N16°17'40"E 240.93'
PARCEL 1
(REEL 2743, IMAGE 431)
APN 087-0011-017-06
RE 2743 IM 431
APN 87-11-15-3
A.C.W.D. CITY OF UNION CITY
N.A.P.O.T.S.

PARCEL 3
APN 087-0011-015-15
RE 2743 IM 431
APN 501-1800-001-50
CITY OF FREMONT RE 5481 IM 104 (78-131972)
N.A.P.O.T.S.

PARCEL 2
TRACK 2626 (49 M 69-71)
APN 087-0011-016-03
PARCEL 5
TRACK 3835 (95 M 89)
APN 087-0095-119-00

PARCEL B
DOC. 1981-162635
APN 507-0030-013-01, N.A.P.O.T.S.

PARCEL A
DOC. 1981-162635
APN 507-0030-013-02, N.A.P.O.T.S.

TRACT MAP 7420
299 M 68
LOT 1, N.A.P.O.T.S.

PARCEL 4A
TRACK 2626 (49 M 69-71

TRACK 3835
95 M 88
N6°02'35"W 27.03'

ALVARADO NILES ROAD

GRACKLE
COURT 60'

TOWEE COURT
OSPREY

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY OF FREMONT

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROPOSED QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY

PROPOSED
PARCEL "B"
(FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL

DEVELOPMENT)
148,833± SQFT

3.42± AC
132'
ROW
143'
ROW
10'

PROPOSED
LE & PUE 40' PROPOSED PAE
6' PROPOSED PUE

EXISTING STREET EASEMENT
(DOC. 85-209422) TO BE ABANDONED

BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT

PROPOSED
10' LE
& PUE 10' PROPOSED LE & PUE 10' PROPOSED LE & PUE

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT
(BART) DISTRICT RE 2835, IM 675
74' RECORDED
ROW
132'
ROW
Q
U
A R
R
Y
L
A
K
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
124'
ROW

SKYLARK DRIVE

PERRY ROAD

REALIGNED
QUARRY
LAKES
DRIVE
OLD

ALAMEDA

CREEK FUTURE ROADWAY EXTENSION
20' PATH EASEMENT FOR

FUTURE MULTI-PATH TRAIL
15' EXISTING PATH EASEMENT
EASEMENT DEED (DOC 20002371968)
R/W

KINGLET
COURT

EXISTING PG&E POLE LINE
EASEMENT (2293 O.R. 348)

6.0' EXISTING 20' PT&T ESMT
(8147 O.R. 371)

20.0'
POND
COMMON (PRIVATE) 84' PROPOSED ROW 44.9' EXISTING ESMT TO

BE TERMINATED
WITH FEE TRANSFER 10' RECORDED LE & PUE
LOTUS
DRIVE
68'
PROPOSED PARCEL "A"
(FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT)
999,426± SQFT

22.94 ± AC
PROPOSED PARCEL "C"
(FUTURE WATER QUALITY

TREATMENT BASIN)
243,887 ± SQFT

5.60 ± AC
PROPOSED PARCEL "D"
(ARROYO PARK EXTENSION)
285,035 ± SQFT

6.18 ± AC

REFER TO THE STATE OR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION "HISTORICAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE REPORT" AND FINDING OF ADVERSE EFFECT DD-034410-01001

PROPOSED

BUS SHELTER

PAD EASEMENT

PROPOSED

BUS SHELTER

PAD EASEMENT

ROADWAY EASEMENT FROM

BART TO BE ACQUIRED BY

SEPARATE INSTRUMENT
9,152 SQFT

0.21 ± AC
26' WIDE

PROPOSED

SECONDARY
ACCESS
26' WIDE

SECONDARY
ACCESS
EX. BIKE PATH TO

BE ABANDONED
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK

IN WELL
(NO STAMP)
6' PROPOSED PUE

EXISTING OVERHEAD

ELECTRICAL LINE TO REMAIN

EXISTING

PETERSON HOUSE
TO REMAIN N74°27'15"W
115.01'
N15°32'45"E
165.00'
N74°27'15"W
150.00'
N15°32'45"E

79.37'
N74°27'15"W

34.99'
N15°32'45"E

85.63'
N25°18'09"E

69.92'
R=30.00'
∆=11°41'04"
L=6.12'
N16°42'00"E 185.36'
N71°21'47"W 175.55' N18°38'13"E 724.72'
C12
C11
L1
C10
C9
C8 N69°16'44"W
149.14'
R=25.00'
∆=94°28'10"
L=41.22'
N16°17'40"E 497.15'
C1
C2
C3
C4
R=1420.00'
∆=31°36'42"
L=783.45'
N71°21'47"W 251.58'
R=15.00'
∆=90°00'00"
L=23.56'
N18°38'13"E 586.36'
R=182.00'
∆=13°28'05"
L=42.78'
R=218.00'
∆=13°28'05"
L=51.24'
N18°38'13"E 83.62'
R=3775.00'
∆=1°24'46"
L=93.08'
R=6.00'
∆=88°40'24"
L=9.29'
N71°08'30"W 6.03'
C5
C6 C7
N56°35'07"W 51.52'
N49°53'02"W 60.67'
C13
C14
C15
L2
C16
R=1336.00' ∆=36°41'18" L=855.48'
N71°21'47"W 254.58'
N18°38'16"E 227.95'
N18°38'13"E 121.00'
N10°34'35"E 57.05'
N18°38'13"E 261.30'
N82°17'07"E 138.38'
N82°17'07"E 9.25'
N82°17'07"E 161.96'
R=480.00'
∆=13°40'03"
L=114.50'
R=12.00'
∆=90°00'00"
L=18.85'
N73°58'54"W

41.4'
N16°05'23"E

67.4'
16' WIDE FUTURE PATH

EASEMENT TO BE

ACQUIRED BY

SEPARATE INSTRUMENT

CITY OF FREMONT

CITY OF FREMONT
PORTION OF EXISTING 15 FT PATH

EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED BY

SEPARATE EASEMENT

EXTERIOR PROPERTY LINE
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP BOUNDARY)

PROPOSED PARCEL LINE

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

RECORDED RIGHT OF WAY

RECORDED EASEMENT

EXISTING BUILDING

ADJACENT PARCEL LINE

EXISTING CREEK FLOW LINE

AREA TO BE ACQUIRED IN FEE

MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED
FOUND 2-1/2" BRASS DISC IN

WELL (NO STAMP) (NO RECORD)
SET 3/4" X 18" IRON PIPE

STAMPED LS XXXX

BOUNDARY LINE NODE

EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINE

EXISTING FENCE LINE

AC ACRES

AE ACCESS EASEMENT

LE LANDSCAPE EASEMENT
N.A.P.O.T.S. NOT A PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION

PAE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT

PT&T PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH

COMPANY

ROW RIGHT OF WAY

SQFT SQUARE FEET
LEGEND

ABBREVIATIONS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF UNION CITY DRAFT C3.0LOTTING PLAN
C
C
B B

DETAIL B
20' PT&T

EASEMENT

PROPERTY

LINE/BOUNDARY

EXISTING

OVERHEAD LINE

EXISTING FENCE

APPROXIMATE &

POSSIBLE

LOCATION OF

PG&E POLE LINE

EASEMENT

SEE DETAIL B

SEE DETAIL C

DETAIL C
20' PT&T

EASEMENT

PROPERTY

LINE/BOUNDARY

EXISTING

OVERHEAD LINE

EXISTING FENCE

APPROXIMATE &

POSSIBLE

LOCATION OF

PG&E POLE LINE

EASEMENT

SEE DETAIL D
20' PT&T

EASEMENT

PROPERTY

LINE/BOUNDARY

EXISTING

OVERHEAD LINE

EXISTING FENCE

APPROXIMATE &

POSSIBLE

LOCATION OF

PG&E POLE LINE

EASEMENT

DETAIL D

3.1'
NORTH
A A
79 of 331

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF UNION CITY

DRAFT SECTIONS
C3.1

FOR REFERENCE ONLY
SOURCE: QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY

R/W COMPARISON EXHIBIT

BY MARK THOMAS
DATED MAY 2026
C-C
80 of 331
N25°26'48"W 34.67'
N16°20'59"E 124.85'
N76°40'52"E 34.21'
N73°42'00"W 60.00' 99.99' N16°20'59"EN73°42'00"W 29.86' N16°18'00"E 162.14' N73°41'16"W 50.52' 95.56' N16°18'00"E
R=329.98' ∆=63°38'45" L=36 .5 '
N16°17'40"E 750.24'
N16°18'27"E 84.94'
N49°53'02"W 118.06'
N11°03'04"E
114.75'
R=2036.87' ∆=19°47'45" L=703.74' N16°05'23"E 1066.32'
N73°58'54"W 325.01'
N53°56'53"W 621.43'
N73°39'01"W 425.42'
N69°56'33"W 736.87'
N76°58'23"W 330.02'
N82°17'07"E 309.59'

ALVARADO NILES ROAD

GRACKLE
COURT 60'

TOWEE COURT
OSPREY

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY OF FREMONT

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROPOSED QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY

PROPOSED
PARCEL "B"
(FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL

DEVELOPMENT)
148,833± SQFT

3.42± AC
132'
ROW
143'
ROW
10'

PROPOSED
LE & PUE 40' PROPOSED PAE
6' PROPOSED PUE

PROPOSED
10' LE
& PUE 10' PROPOSED LE & PUE 10' PROPOSED LE & PUE

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT
(BART) DISTRICT RE 2835, IM 675
132'
ROW
Q
U
A R
R
Y
L
A
K
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
124'
ROW

SKYLARK DRIVE

PERRY ROAD

REALIGNED
QUARRY
LAKES

DRIVE FUTURE ROADWAY EXTENSION
20' PATH EASEMENT FOR

FUTURE MULTI-PATH TRAIL
15' EXISTING PATH EASEMENT
EASEMENT DEED (DOC 20002371968)
R/W

KINGLET
COURT

EXISTING PG&E POLE LINE
EASEMENT (2293 O.R. 348)

6.0' EXISTING 20' PT&T ESMT
(8147 O.R. 371)

20.0'
POND
COMMON
(PRIVATE) 84' PROPOSED ROW 44.9' EXISTING ESMT TO

BE TERMINATED

WITH FEE TRANSFER
LOTUS
DRIVE
68'
PROPOSED PARCEL "A"
(FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT)
999,426± SQFT

22.94 ± AC
PROPOSED PARCEL "C"
(FUTURE WATER QUALITY

TREATMENT BASIN)
243,887 ± SQFT

5.60 ± AC
PROPOSED PARCEL "D"
(ARROYO PARK EXTENSION)
285,035 ± SQFT

6.18 ± AC

REFER TO THE STATE OR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION "HISTORICAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE REPORT" AND FINDING OF ADVERSE EFFECT DD-034410-01001

PROPOSED

BUS SHELTER

PAD EASEMENT

PROPOSED

BUS SHELTER

PAD EASEMENT

ROADWAY EASEMENT FROM

BART TO BE ACQUIRED BY

SEPARATE INSTRUMENT
9,152 SQFT

0.21 ± AC
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK

IN WELL
(NO STAMP)
6' PROPOSED PUE

EXISTING

PETERSON HOUSE
TO REMAIN N74°27'15"W
115.01'
N15°32'45"E
165.00'
N74°27'15"W
150.00'
N15°32'45"E

79.37'
N74°27'15"W

34.99'
N15°32'45"E

85.63'
N25°18'09"E

69.92'
R=30.00'
∆=11°41'04"
L=6.12'
N16°42'00"E 185.36'
N71°21'47"W 175.55'
N18°38'13"E 724.72'
C12
C11
L1
C10
C9
C8 N69°16'44"W
149.14'
R=25.00'
∆=94°28'10"
L=41.22'
N16°17'40"E 497.15'
C1
C2
C3
C4
R=1420.00'
∆=31°36'42"
L=783.45'
N71°21'47"W 251.58'
R=15.00'
∆=90°00'00"
L=23.56'
N18°38'13"E 586.36'
R=182.00'
∆=13°28'05"
L=42.78'
R=218.00'
∆=13°28'05"
L=51.24'
N18°38'13"E 83.62'
R=3775.00'
∆=1°24'46"
L=93.08'
R=6.00'
∆=88°40'24"
L=9.29'
N71°08'30"W 6.03'
C5
C6 C7
N56°35'07"W 51.52'
N49°53'02"W 60.67'
C13
C14
C15
L2
C16
R=1336.00' ∆=36°41'18" L=855.48'
N71°21'47"W 254.58'
N18°38'16"E 227.95'
N18°38'13"E 121.00'
N10°34'35"E 57.05'
N18°38'13"E 261.30'
N82°17'07"E 138.38'
N82°17'07"E 9.25'
N82°17'07"E 161.96'
R=480.00'
∆=13°40'03"
L=114.50'
R=12.00'
∆=90°00'00"
L=18.85'
N73°58'54"W

41.4'
N16°05'23"E

67.4'
16' WIDE FUTURE PATH

EASEMENT TO BE

ACQUIRED BY

SEPARATE INSTRUMENT

CITY OF FREMONT

CITY OF FREMONT
PORTION OF EXISTING 15 FT PATH

EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED BY

SEPARATE EASEMENT

EXTERIOR PROPERTY LINE
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP BOUNDARY)

PROPOSED PARCEL LINE

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

RECORDED RIGHT OF WAY

RECORDED EASEMENT

EXISTING BUILDING

ADJACENT PARCEL LINE

EXISTING CREEK FLOW LINE

AREA TO BE ACQUIRED IN FEE

MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED
FOUND 2-1/2" BRASS DISC IN

WELL (NO STAMP) (NO RECORD)
SET 3/4" X 18" IRON PIPE

STAMPED LS XXXX

BOUNDARY LINE NODE

EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINE

EXISTING FENCE LINE

AC ACRES

AE ACCESS EASEMENT

LE LANDSCAPE EASEMENT
N.A.P.O.T.S. NOT A PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION

PAE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT

PT&T PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH

COMPANY

ROW RIGHT OF WAY

SQFT SQUARE FEET
LEGEND

ABBREVIATIONS

PROPOSED PARCELS

PARCEL NAME PARCEL USE PARCEL GROSS AREA
(SQFT)

PARCEL GROSS AREA
(AC)
A RESIDENTIAL 999426 22.94
B RESIDENTIAL 148,833 3.42
A & B COMBINED RESIDENTIAL 1,148,259 26.36

C WATER QUALITY
TREATMENT BASIN 243,887 5.60
D ARROYO PARK EXTENSION 285,035 6.54
- CITY RIGHT OF WAY 331,061 7.60
TOTAL 2,008,242 46.10 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF UNION CITY DRAFT C3.2PROPOSED PARCEL BOUNDARIES
NORTH
81 of 331

EXTERIOR PROPERTY LINE
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP BOUNDARY)

PROPOSED PARCEL LINE

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

RECORDED RIGHT OF WAY

RECORDED EASEMENT

EXISTING BUILDING

ADJACENT PARCEL LINE

EXISTING CREEK FLOW LINE

AREA TO BE ACQUIRED IN FEE

MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED
FOUND 2-1/2" BRASS DISC IN

WELL (NO STAMP) (NO RECORD)
SET 3/4" X 18" IRON PIPE

STAMPED LS XXXX

BOUNDARY LINE NODE

EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINE

EXISTING FENCE LINE

AC ACRES

AE ACCESS EASEMENT

LE LANDSCAPE EASEMENT
N.A.P.O.T.S. NOT A PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION

PAE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT

PUE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT

PT&T PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH

COMPANY

ROW RIGHT OF WAY

SQFT SQUARE FEET
LEGEND

ABBREVIATIONS

ALVARADO NILES ROAD

GRACKLE
COURT 60'

TOWEE COURT
OSPREY

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY OF FREMONT

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROPOSED QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY

PROPOSED
PARCEL "B"
(FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL

DEVELOPMENT)
148,833± SQFT

3.42± AC
10'

PROPOSED
LE & PUE 40' PROPOSED PAE
6' PROPOSED PUE

PROPOSED
10' LE
& PUE 10' PROPOSED LE & PUE 10' PROPOSED LE & PUE

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT
(BART) DISTRICT RE 2835, IM 675
Q
U
A
R
R
Y
L
A
K
E
S
D
R
I
V
E

SKYLARK DRIVE

PERRY ROAD

REALIGNED
QUARRY
LAKES

DRIVE FUTURE ROADWAY EXTENSION
20' PATH EASEMENT FOR

FUTURE MULTI-PATH TRAIL
15' EXISTING PATH EASEMENT
EASEMENT DEED (DOC 20002371968)
R/W

KINGLET
COURT

EXISTING PG&E POLE LINE
EASEMENT (2293 O.R. 348)

6.0' EXISTING 20' PT&T ESMT
(8147 O.R. 371)

20.0'
POND
COMMON
(PRIVATE) 44.9' EXISTING ESMT TO

BE TERMINATED

WITH FEE TRANSFER
LOTUS
DRIVE
68'
PROPOSED PARCEL "A"
(FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT)
999,426± SQFT

22.94 ± AC
PROPOSED PARCEL "C"
(FUTURE WATER QUALITY

TREATMENT BASIN)
243,887 ± SQFT

5.60 ± AC
PROPOSED PARCEL "D"
(ARROYO PARK EXTENSION)
285,035 ± SQFT

6.18 ± AC

REFER TO THE STATE OR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION "HISTORICAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE REPORT" AND FINDING OF ADVERSE EFFECT DD-034410-01001

PROPOSED

BUS SHELTER

PAD EASEMENT

PROPOSED

BUS SHELTER

PAD EASEMENT

ROADWAY EASEMENT FROM

BART TO BE ACQUIRED BY

SEPARATE INSTRUMENT
9,152 SQFT

0.21 ± AC
FOUND 2 1
2 " BRASS DISK

IN WELL
(NO STAMP)
6' PROPOSED PUE

EXISTING

PETERSON HOUSE
TO REMAIN N74°27'15"W
115.01'
N15°32'45"E
165.00'
N74°27'15"W
150.00'
N15°32'45"E

79.37'
N74°27'15"W

34.99'
N15°32'45"E

85.63'
N25°18'09"E

69.92'
16' WIDE FUTURE PATH

EASEMENT TO BE

ACQUIRED BY

SEPARATE INSTRUMENT

CITY OF FREMONT

CITY OF FREMONT
PORTION OF EXISTING 15 FT PATH

EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED BY

SEPARATE EASEMENT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF UNION CITY DRAFT C3.3PROPOSED EASEMENTS
NORTH
82 of 331
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE FIRST

AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $61,650 FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $135,850, FOR THE FINAL
PARCEL MAP FOR PHASE (SEGMENT) 2 OF THE QUARRY LAKES

PARKWAY PROJECT (EAST WEST CONNECTOR), CITY PROJECT
NO. 18-04
WHEREAS, for the past several decades, a proposed roadway corridor between I-880 in Fremont and Mission Boulevard (Route 238) in Union City, parallel to Decoto Road, was sponsored and managed by Caltrans (Route 84 Corridor) and various Alameda County transportation agencies (East West Connector Project), most recently by the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC); and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2018, Alameda CTC approved a request from the City of Union City to be the project sponsor for the remaining phases of the East West Connector Project and to update the project description eligible for the remaining commitment from the 1986 Measure B Transportation Expenditure Plan; and WHEREAS, to better manage the project, the City divided the project into usable segments or phases that included Phase (Segment) 1: 7th Street Connection (7th Street to Mission Boulevard), Phase (Segment) 2: Gateway Connection (Old Alameda Creek to Alvarado-Niles Road), Phase (Segment) 3: 11th Street Connection (11th Street to 7th Street), Phase (Segment) 4: Alvarado-Niles Connection & Grade Separations (BART and Oakland Subdivision) and Phase (Segment) 5: Paseo Padre Parkway & Bike Trail Connection (Paseo Padre Parkway in Fremont to Old Alameda Creek in Union City); and WHEREAS, the Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, is funded with 1986 Measure B funds, 2014 Measure BB funds, and other transportation funds administered by Alameda CTC; and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2021, the California Transportation Commission approved Item 2.4d. (3), Action Item: the conveyance of excess Route 84 state-owned real property referred to as the Gateway Site to Union City, and on July 29, 2021, the City received the recorded Director’s Deed Grant transferring the excess state-owned real property to Union City. That Director’s Grant Deed is attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No.2025- 146 authorizing the dedication of city-owned land as Right-of-Way, Landscape Easement, and Public Utility Easement for Phase (Segment)_2 of the Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector) Project, City Project No. 18-04, and authorizing the City Manager to accept such dedication for the new Quarry Lakes Parkway, the realigned Quarry Lakes Drive and portion of existing Alvarado-Niles Road; and
WHEREAS, since the above City Council action and through the roadway design refinement, the Right- of- Way, Landscape Easement, and Public Utility Easement on Quarry Lakes Drive have been revised; and
83 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve First Amendment to Kimley-Horn for QLP Tentative and Parcel Maps

Page 2 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, since the above City Council action, Union City has been coordinating with BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) to either secure a roadway easement for the portion of Lotus Pond Common for the Alvarado-Niles Road intersection improvements including new sidewalk, street lighting, traffic signal system, landscape and irrigation; and WHEREAS, on May 15, 2026, the Parties entered into a Consulting Services Agreement (C26PW1333) (“Agreement”) wherein the Consultant will provide the City with professional/surveying services to prepare a Tentative Parcel Map of Phase (Segment) 2 for Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector), City Project No. 18-04, in the amount of $74,200; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Tentative Parcel Map of the former Caltrans parcels bounded by Old Alameda Creek, Osprey Drive, Alvarado-Niles Road and the Fremont City Limits is to define the Public Rights-of-Way for the new, realigned and modified roadways and the property boundaries for the future residential development parcels; and
WHEREAS, the map preparation included obtaining survey control and design geometrics from Phase 2 Design Consultant (Mark Thomas), performing meets-andbounds field surveys, and reviewing updated Title Reports; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2026, the BART Board of Directors approved the Grant of Roadway Easement to the City of Union City in the amount of $53,290 for Lotus Pond Common, see Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, in late August 2026, BART provided Union City with the Purchase Agreement for Roadway Easement for review comments before approval at an upcoming City Council meeting;
WHEREAS, the draft Tentative Parcel Map No. 11643 dated September 2, 2026 identifies updated Public Right-of-Way, Landscaped Easement and Public Utility Easements for new Quarry Lakes Drive, revised Quarry Lakes Parkway and additional Public Right-of-Way for a portion of Alvarado-Niles Road with the two remaining development parcels totaling about 26 acres; and
WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the Consulting Service Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. will allow the Consultant to revise the Parcel Map by performing additional boundary surveys, calculating the recent design refinements, and adding the recorded BART roadway easement after upcoming City Council approval; and WHEREAS, the Final Parcel Map is scheduled to be approved and recorded by early 2027 as required by Alameda CTC Quarry Lakes Parkway (East West Connector) Project Funding Agreement No. A22-0053 before Phase (Segment) 2 of Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, before construction funds can be approved for advertisement; and
84 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve First Amendment to Kimley-Horn for QLP Tentative and Parcel Maps

Page 3 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $ 61,650, will be funded with the Public Improvements Fund (Account Number 416-91804-57115) as budgeted in the approved Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Union City does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $61,650, for a total of $135,850, for the Final Parcel Map for Phase 2 (Gateway Site) of the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, in a form approved by the City Attorney; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager is authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on September 22, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments

1. Exhibit A- Director Deed (Caltrans site)

2. Exhibit B - BART Roadway Easement Board Memo and Map 85 of 331
86 of 331
87 of 331
88 of 331
89 of 331
90 of 331
91 of 331

EXECUTIVE DECISION DOCUMENT
GENERAL MANAGER APPROVAL: GENERAL MANAGER ACTION REQ'D:

N/A
DATE: 6/19/2026 7/2/2026 BOARD INITIATED ITEM: No
Originator/Prepared by: Thang Nguyen
Dept: Real Estate & Prop Development
General Counsel Chief Financial Officer District Secretary BARC Signature/Date:
6/29/2026 6/29/2026 [ ] 6/30/2026 [ ] 7/2/2026 [ ] 6/30/2026[ ] Grant of Roadway Easement to City of Union City
PURPOSE:

To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager or his designee to enter into any agreements and execute all documents necessary to effectuate the sale of a roadway easement of approximately 9,152 square feet to the City of Union City.

DISCUSSION:

BART is the fee owner of a 53,470 square foot parcel of real property located adjacent to Alvarado-Niles Road in Union City CA, identified as Alameda County Assessor’s Parcel number 87-11-18-3, also known as BART Parcel O-AB74 (the “BART Property”). The BART Property is bordered by two City of Union City parcels both to the north and south and serves as an access road for BART to its tracks continuing Fox Avenue and for the adjacent property by way of an Ingress/Egress Easement.

The City of Union City (the “City”) is the fee owner of a 37-acre property adjacent to the south of the BART Property, identified as Alameda County Assessor’s Parcel number 87- 11-15-14 (the “City Property”). The City is in the process of selling the City Property to City Ventures, a developer, who plans to build approximately 535 multi-family units on the site, known as the Gateway Site (“the Development”).

Implementation of the Development requires construction of various circulation improvements in and adjacent to the site, including a signalized intersection located at Alvarado-Niles Road and a roadway configuration located both within the Development as well as on a 9,152 square foot portion of the BART Property (“Roadway Improvements”).

If the Board authorizes the sale of the Roadway Easement, it will become part of the City’s 92 of 331
Grant of Roadway Easement to City of Union City (cont.) street system.

In order to comply with the obligation to construct the Roadway Improvements, the City has made an offer to purchase a 9,252 square foot Roadway Easement on the BART Property (the “Roadway Easement”). See Attachment 1 – Location Map. The Roadway Easement is identified as BART Parcel O-AB74E7. The subject easement area is part of the BART Property that has no economic development potential otherwise. It is encumbered with numerous easements, including the Ingress/Egress Easement. The City has agreed to pay BART the full appraised fair market value of $53,290 based on an appraisal report prepared by Terry Larson of Larson Valuation, LLC, dated April 3, 2026.

The appraisal report establishes fair market value and conforms to Standards Rule 2-2(a) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”) and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U. S. C. 4601 et seq., (“URA”) as amended.

Prior to execution, the Office of the General Counsel will approve all documents reasonably necessary to effectuate the sale of the Easement as to form.

FISCAL IMPACT:

If the BART Board authorizes the sale of the proposed Roadway Easement, the District will receive $53,290. BART will incur no costs in selling the Roadway Easement other than Office of General Counsel and Real Estate and Property Management staff time. The sale proceeds will be deposited into BART’s General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not authorize the sale of the Roadway Easement, forgoing a one-time revenue of $53,470 for BART. The developer would likely need to redesign the project, potentially reducing the number of residential units.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the following Motion.

MOTION:

The Board of Directors authorizes the General Manager or his designee to enter into an agreement to sell an approximately 9,152 square foot roadway easement, and to execute any other documents reasonably necessary to effectuate said sale. 93 of 331
Grant of Roadway Easement to City of Union City (cont.) 94 of 331
ATTACHMENT 1
Location M ap
Legend
BART Stations
A Line
S Line
1: 53,270
8,878.3 0 4,439.13 8,878.3 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable.

THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
Site Map
1: 1,665
277.4 0 138.72 277.4 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable.

THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
Site Address: Lotus Pond Common/Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City Size: Approximately 9,152 Square Feet
95 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 2 June 23, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.8
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Two-Year Service Contract to P31 Enterprises, Inc., in the Amount of $208,209 per Year, for a Total NotTo-Exceed Amount of $430,000, for Tree Pruning and Removal, and Authorizing the City Manager, at Their Sole Discretion, To Exercise Options to Extend the Contract for a Third, Fourth, and Fifth Year, for an Additional Amount of up to $255,000 per Year, for a Total Notto-Exceed Amount of $1,195,000

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding a two-year service contract to P31 Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $208,209 per year, for a total not-toexceed amount of $430,000, for tree pruning and removal, and authorizing the City Manager, at their sole discretion, to exercise options to extend the contract for a third, fourth, and fifth year, for an additional amount of up to $255,000 per year, for a total notto-exceed amount of $1,195,000.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

BACKGROUND
The proper care and maintenance of over 50,000 City-maintained trees that beautify the various parks, public streets, and City facilities these important resources involves inspection, trimming, pruning, and, on rare occasions, removal, based on criteria that balance the protection of the tree as an urban forest investment with safety and aesthetics. Each year, the tree pruning needs of the City are reviewed by the Grounds Division of Public Works, who are tasked with making recommendations as to which trees, in which neighborhoods, should be pruned. Additionally, the Grounds Division prepares for each winter storm season by allocating contingency funds for emergencyresponse tree work to clear incidents involving fallen branches or trees in the public right96 of 331 Agenda Item No. 3.8
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 2 September 22, 2026 5 7 2
of-way. The sheer volume of both the routine and emergency tree work requires additional staffing and equipment resources beyond the limits of what the Grounds Division is able to provide.

On August 19, 2026, the City advertised for bid the Citywide Tree Pruning and Removal Project on the City’s website, with the active builder exchanges listed in the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission’s Cost Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual 2019 Edition, and with the Bay Area News Group for two consecutive weeks, beginning on August 21, 2026. Eight proposals were received and were opened on September 10, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in City Hall.

DISCUSSION
The lowest bidder, P31 Enterprises, Inc., submitted a bid of $208,209, which is approximately 31% below the Engineer’s Estimate for the project. The City has not worked previously with this contractor, but reference checks were satisfactory, with several successful high-profile projects found in their portfolio.

FISCAL IMPACT
The service contract with P31 Enterprises, Inc., in the not-to-exceed amount of $430,000, will be funded with monies available in the Lighting & Landscaping Fund (Account Number 282-33025-54111) for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and Fiscal Year 2027-2028.

The is no impact on the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding a two-year service contract to P31 Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $208,209 per year, for a total not-toexceed amount of $430,000, for tree pruning and removal, and authorizing the City Manager, at their sole discretion, to exercise options to extend the contract for a third, fourth, and fifth year, for an additional amount of up to $255,000 per year, for a total notto-exceed amount of $1,195,000.

Prepared by: Jesus Banuelos, Grounds Supervisor
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – Notice of Inviting Bid

2. Draft Resolution

3. Exhibit A – Bid Results
97 of 331

CITY OF UNION CITY

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

CITYWIDE TREE PRUNING AND REMOVAL

NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS
The City of Union City is soliciting bids from qualified Contractors to complete the project CITYWIDE TREE PRUNING AND REMOVAL. Instructions and requirements for completing a bid are described within the Request for Proposal (RFP). Contractors submitting a proposal will submit it to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Union City, City Government Building, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, California, until Thursday, September 10, 2026, 2:00PM PST, at which time they will be publicly opened and read in the Council Chambers of said building.

The Contractor shall possess a valid Class C-61/D-49 (Tree Service) California contractor’s license at the time this contract is awarded.

Bid Package & Bid Package Location. All of the project work is to be done in accordance with the bid package on file with the Public Works Department - City of Union City, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, California 94587. Eligibility to bid on this project requires bid package to be electronically obtained from the City. Bid package may be obtained at no charge via email request to the City at [email protected]. Non-biddable plans and specifications shall be available to view at various Builders’ Exchanges throughout the Bay Area and on the City of Union City website at www.unioncity.org.

General Work Description: The work to be done, in general, consists of tree pruning services with a small allowance for tree removal and emergency call out work. As the City’s annual tree maintenance contract, the project duration is two years, with the possibility of being extended up to three times for a period of one additional year. The Engineer’s Estimate for the project base is Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) annually.

All questions should be emailed or faxed to Jesus Banuelos of City of Union City, email:
[email protected] or fax to (510) 489-9468. The successful bidder shall furnish a Payment Bond, a Performance Bond, and a Maintenance Bond. 98 of 331
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AWARDING A TWO-YEAR SERVICE CONTRACT TO P31
ENTERPRISES, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $208,209 PER YEAR, FOR A TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $430,000, FOR TREE PRUNING

AND REMOVAL, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, AT THEIR

SOLE DISCRETION, TO EXERCISE OPTIONS TO EXTEND THE

CONTRACT FOR A THIRD, FOURTH, AND FIFTH YEAR, FOR AN
ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF UP TO $255,000 PER YEAR, FOR A TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $1,195,000
WHEREAS, the proper care and maintenance of more than 50,000 Citymaintained trees that beautify the City’s parks, public streets, and facilities involves inspection, trimming, pruning, and, on rare occasions, removal, based on criteria that balance the protection of the tree as an urban forest investment with safety and aesthetics; and
WHEREAS, additionally, the Grounds Division prepares for each winter storm season by allocating contingency funds for emergency-response tree work to clear incidents involving fallen branches or trees in the public right-of-way; the sheer volume of both the routine and emergency tree work requires additional staffing and equipment resources beyond the limits of what the Grounds Division is able to provide; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2026, the City advertised for bid the Citywide Tree Pruning and Removal Project, City Project No. 27-00, on the City’s website, with the active builder exchanges listed in the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission’s Cost Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual 2019 Edition, and with the Bay Area News Group for two consecutive weeks, beginning on August 21, 2026; and WHEREAS, eight proposals were received and were opened on September 10, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the lowest bidder, P31 Enterprises, Inc., submitted a first-year bid of $208,209, which is approximately 31% below the Engineer’s Estimate for the project; and WHEREAS, the service contract with P31 Enterprises, Inc., in the not-to-exceed amount of $430,000, will be funded with funds from the Lighting & Landscaping Fund (Account Number 282-33025-54111) for Fiscal Years 2026-2027 and 2027-2028.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby awards a two-year service contract to P31 Enterprises, Inc., based on its firstyear bid of $208,209, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $430,000, for tree pruning and removal, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager, in the City Manager’s sole discretion, is authorized to exercise options, subject to satisfactory performance and available funding, to extend the contract for a third, fourth, and fifth year, for an additional amount of up to $255,000 per year, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $1,195,000. 99 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXXX
Award Citywide Tree Pruning and Removal Contract to P31 Enterprises, Inc.

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on September 22, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – Bid Summary
100 of 331

CITY OF UNION CITY

BID SUMMARY
PROJECT: Citywide Tree Pruning and Removal (City Project No. 27-00) Project Manager: . Jesus Banuelos, Public Works Grounds Supervisor DATE: Thursday, September 10, 2026
TIME: 2:00 p.m.

LOCATION: City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587
*CORRECTED
No BIDDERS BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT

1. Califa Tree Care Inc. $278,010.00

2. The Professional Tree Care Company $310,250.00

3. West Coast Arborists, Inc. $276,925.00

4. Monarch Landscape Holdings, LLC $297,125.00

5. Green Field Tree Services Inc. $260,365.00

6. P31 Enterprises Inc. $208,209.00

7. California Expert Tree Solutions Inc. $232,395.00

8. Bay Area Tree Specialists $280,366.00

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. 18.

19.

Page 1 of 2 ends

101 of 331

20. 21.

22. 23.

24. 25.

26. 27.

28. 29.

30. I, Christopher Chang, Administrative Specialist - Confidential, of the City of Union City, do hereby certify that on Thursday, September 10, 2026, I received and opened eight (8) bids for the above-mentioned project.
* Note: All bid amounts will be verified by the Engineer. Any corrections will be shown in the column above.

Ch.±. ristopher Chang
Administrative Specialist - Confidential

Page 2 of 2 ends

102 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 4 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.9
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving the Award of a Construction Contract to McKim Corporation, in the Amount of $641,564, Approving a Total Construction Budget, in the Amount of $769,877, and Appropriating $799,877 From Various Funds to the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving the award of a construction contract to McKim Corporation, in the amount of $641,564, approving a total construction budget in the amount of $769,877, and appropriating $799,877 from various funds to the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2, City Project No. 26-

38. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

BACKGROUND
The City’s 2021 Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) identified Dyer Street as needing roadway rehabilitation and as a gap in the City’s bicycle network. On May 23, 2017, City Council adopted Resolution No. 5073-17, accepting $872,000 of Federal One Bay Area Grant 2 (OBAG2) funds for the Dyer Street Rehabilitation Project.

On August 10, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5816-21, awarding the construction contract for the Dyer Street Rehabilitation Project (City Project No. 18-20).

The work comprised:
• Repairing uplifted or damaged sidewalks, curbs & gutters and upgrading ramps • Grinding down the roadway pavement and applying a new asphalt concrete layer 103 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.9
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 4 September 22, 2026 • Incorporating buffered bike lane striping in each direction along with complete streets elements accounting for improved visibility, parking, and bus stop incorporation (this last improvement was identified in the 2012 Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan and, again, in the 2021 update)
The project was substantially completed in February 2022 and, on June 14, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution No. 5950-22, accepting the completion of work for Phase I of the Dyer Street Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. 18-20.

Staff determined that further improvements on Dyer Street were warranted and sought additional funding to implement a second phase. On February 24, 2026, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-021, accepting $50,000 from the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) for the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2.

On May 12, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-057, adopting a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. The list of projects includes the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2 (to be named City Project No. 26-38).

CIP Project No. 26-38 includes approximately 145,000 square feet of roadway surface rehabilitation on Dyer Street from Deborah Drive to Union City Boulevard. Additionally, bicycle improvements will be made by integrating approximately 0.8 miles of traditional class II and buffered class II lanes into the roadway, as well as minor pedestrian and transit stop upgrades to improve the quality of those alternative modes of travel.

Project specifics were presented to the City’s Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) on July 21, 2026. The BPAC was able to openly discuss project details, express concerns, and voice their support for the project. The BPAC was supportive of the project, citing improvements in bicycle safety and the need to fill the bicycle network gap.

On August 21, 2026, plans and specifications for the project were released and advertised for bids (Attachment 1).

On September 8, 2026, the City received twelve (12) bids (see Exhibit A), with the lowest responsive and responsible base bid of $566,963.50 submitted by McKim Corporation of Gilroy, California. The twelve bids received indicate a competitive bidding process, with the two lowest bids within 5% of each other.

DISCUSSION
The low bid is approximately 27% below the engineer’s estimate of $780,000. McKim Corporation has done work for Union City previously, completing the Decoto Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project in 2024-25, with additional reference checks being satisfactory.

The recommended total construction budget of $769,877 includes the base bid amount of $566,964, additional bid alternate items (BA1 through BA6) totaling $74,600, and a construction contingency of $128,313, approximately 20% of the construction contract amount. Including the construction budget and the inspection services, the total project 104 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.9
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 4 September 22, 2026 budget is $799,877.

Construction of this project is anticipated to start in October 2026 and be completed by the end of November 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38, in the amount of $799,877, will be funded as follows:

Amount Fund Name Account
$573,129 SB 1 Road Maintenance & Rehab Fund 251-92638-57128 $133,301 ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund 253-92638-57128
$93,447 ACTIA Bike and Pedestrian Paths Fund 254-92638-57128 $799,877 Total
There are available fund balances within these funds to support this project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Approving the award of the construction contract to McKim Corporation, in the amount of $641,564, including additional bid alternate items (BA1 through BA6), for the construction of the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38.

2. Approving a total construction budget in the amount of $769,877 for the construction contract, including a construction contingency of $128,313, approximately 20% of the construction contract amount.

3. Appropriating from the following funds to the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38:
a. $133,301 from ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund
b. $ 93,447 from ACTIA Bike & Pedestrian Paths Fund
c. $573,129 from SB 1 Road Maintenance & Rehab Fund
Prepared by: Carly Kasper, Civil Engineer I
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
105 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.9
City Council Staff Report Page 4 of 4 September 22, 2026 Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – Notice of Bid

2. Draft Resolution

3. Exhibit A – Bid Summary
106 of 331

CITY OF UNION CITY

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CITY PROJECT NO. 26-38

NOTICE TO BIDDERS
Sealed bids for Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38, will be received at the office of the City Clerk of the City of Union City, City Government Building, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, California, until Tuesday, September 8
th, 2026, 2:00PM PST.

This project will improve the corridor through roadway resurfacing and pavement rehabilitation, updated pavement striping and traffic control markings, implementation of bicycle lanes and related signage, and pedestrian-focused enhancements including sidewalk repairs, upgraded crosswalks, and other accessibility improvements. The Engineer’s Estimate for the project base is Seven Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($780,000).

The Non-Bid plans and specifications may be found on the Union City Website at https://www.unioncityca.gov/Bids.aspx. Bid package may be obtained at no charge via email request to the City at [email protected]. Non-biddable plans and specifications shall be available to view at various Builders’ Exchanges throughout the Bay Area and on the City of Union City website at www.unioncity.org.

All questions should be emailed to Carly Kasper, email: [email protected] at least five (5) working days prior to the time specified for the bid opening. 107 of 331
108 of 331
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

APPROVING THE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO
MCKIM CORPORATION, IN THE AMOUNT OF $641,564, APPROVING A TOTAL CONSTRUCTION BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $769,877, AND APPROPRIATING $799,877 FROM VARIOUS FUNDS TO THE DYER
STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT – PHASE 2, CITY
PROJECT NO. 26-38
WHEREAS, the City’s 2021 Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) identified Dyer Street as in need of roadway rehabilitation and as a gap in the City’s bicycle network.

On May 23, 2017, City Council adopted Resolution No. 5073-17, accepting $872,000 of Federal One Bay Area Grant 2 (OBAG2) funds for the Dyer Street Rehabilitation Project; and
WHEREAS, on August 10, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5816- 21, awarding the construction contract for the Dyer Street Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. 18-20; and
WHEREAS, the project was substantially completed in February 2022 and, on June 14, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution No. 5950-22, accepting the completion of work for Phase I of the Dyer Street Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. 18-20; and WHEREAS, staff determined that further improvements on Dyer Street were warranted and sought additional funding to implement a second phase of improvements; and
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2026, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-021, accepting $50,000 from the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) for the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Phase 2, and on May 12, 2026, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-057, approving a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, which included the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Phase 2; and
WHEREAS, this project includes approximately 145,000 square feet of roadway surface rehabilitation on Dyer Street from Deborah Drive to Union City Boulevard, as well as bicycle improvements and minor pedestrian and transit stop upgrades to increase the quality of those alternate modes of travel; and
WHEREAS, project specifics were presented to the City’s Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) on July 21, 2026, and the BPAC was supportive of the project; and
WHEREAS, on August 21, 2026, plans and specifications for the project were released and advertised for bids; and
WHEREAS, on September 8, 2026, the City received twelve (12) bids (see Exhibit A), with the lowest responsive and responsible base bid of $566,963.50 submitted by McKim Corporation of Gilroy, California; and
109 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Award Contract for Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation – Phase 2

Page 2 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, the low bid is approximately 27% below the engineer’s estimate of $780,000. McKim Corporation has done work for Union City previously, completing the Decoto Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project in 2024-25, with additional reference checks being satisfactory; and
WHEREAS, the recommended total construction budget of $769,877 includes the base bid amount of $566,964, additional bid alternate items (BA1 through BA6) in the amount of $74,600, and a construction contingency of $128,313, approximately 20% of the construction contract amount; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the construction budget, inspection services in the amount of $30,000 for a total project budget of $799,877 are necessary to support implementation of the project during the construction phase, which will be procured separately in accordance with applicable City procurement requirements and other applicable laws; and
WHEREAS, construction of this project is anticipated to start in October 2026 and be completed by the end of November 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38, in the amount of $799,877, will be funded with $133,301 from ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund (Account Number 253-92638-57128), $93,447 from ACTIA Bike and Pedestrian Paths Fund (Account Number 254-92638-57128) and $573,129 from SB 1 Road Maintenance & Rehab Fund (Account Number 251-92638-57128).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby awards the contract to McKim Corporation, in the amount of $641,564, including additional bid alternate items (BA1 through BA6), for the construction of the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to take all actions to effectuate the intent of this Resolution, including execution of the contract and all documents in a form approved by the City Attorney; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby approves a total construction budget, including a 20% contingency, in the amount of $769,877; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes appropriations from the following funds to the Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Phase 2, City Project No. 26-38:
a. $133,301 from ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund
b. $93,447 from ACTIA Bike & Pedestrian Paths Fund
c. $573,129 from SB 1 Road Maintenance & Rehab Fund
110 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Award Contract for Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation – Phase 2

Page 3 of 3 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on September 22, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – Bid Summary
111 of 331

Page 1 of 1 ends

BID SUMMARY
PROJECT: Dyer Street Rehab Project (City Project No. 26-38) Project Manager: Carly Kasper, Civil Engineer I
DATE: Tuesday, September 8, 2026
TIME: 2:00 p.m.

LOCATION: City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587
No. BIDDERS BID AMOUNT
*CORRECTED*

BID AMOUNT

1. RNR Paving, Inc. $749,680.58

2. APEŇA Engineering, Inc. $623,825.50

3. Mission Constructors, Inc. $708,323.28

4. McKim Corporation $566,505.00

5. Roadway Construction, Inc. $657,777.00

6. QA Constructors, Inc. $666,135.00

7. Radius Earthwork, Inc. $697,349.15

8. O’Grady Paving, Inc. $616,548.10

9. Interstate Grading & Paving, Inc. $723,068.00

10. DeSilva Gates Construction LLC $591,195.00

11. Goodfellow Bros. California $669,994.00

12. Kerex Engineering, Inc. $780,000.00
I, Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk of the City of Union City, do hereby certify that on Tuesday, September 8, 2026, I received and opened twelve (12) bids for the above-mentioned project.
* Note: All bid amounts will be verified by the Engineer. Any corrections will be shown in the column above.

Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk
$566,964.00
112 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.10
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Gates Studio, in the Amount of $41,930, for a Total Not-to-Exceed Contract Amount of $340,940, for Additional Scope of Work for the Revision and Update of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, City Project No. 24-20, and Appropriating $41,930 from the Park-In-Lieu Fund in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for Project No. 24-20

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Gates Studio in the amount of $41,930. The amendment adds project management services and technical analyses needed to complete the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, extends the agreement through December 31, 2027, and increases the total not-to-exceed contract amount from $299,010 to $340,940. Approval will also appropriate $41,930 from the Park-In-Lieu Fund in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for City Project No. 24-20. No General Fund funding is required. These services will support future decisions concerning park funding, staffing, and maintenance.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal D, Strategy 11: Develop a ten-year plan for parks operations, maintenance, and capital improvements.

BACKGROUND
The City’s original Parks and Recreation Master Plan, adopted in 1999, is well past its useful life. The 25-year plan is a very basic document that provides only a high-level overview of the city’s parks system, with limited detail on implementation strategies, community engagement, and long-term vision. It lacks the depth and data-driven analysis needed to guide modern park planning, such as equity mapping, sustainability goals, and maintenance standards.
113 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.10
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 September 22, 2026 On May 13, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-064, approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Gates + Associates, Inc. in the amount of $299,010 to revise and update the 1999 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The proposed amendment identifies Gates Studio as the successor consultant following a consolidation of the two legal entities. The original scope of work included eight components, Tasks A through H, and one optional component, Task I: Optional Services. Staff excluded Task I from the original agreement because it would have exceeded the $300,000 available in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Staff anticipated revisiting Task I when additional funding became available.

DISCUSSION
As the project progressed, staff determined that the services identified under Task I were necessary to produce a comprehensive and implementable Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These services include:

1. A capital improvement program funding strategy

2. A staffing assessment

3. A parks maintenance operations plan
These services will provide additional analysis of the City’s staffing levels, maintenance operations, and long-term capital funding needs. The results will help identify service gaps and inform future park improvements, staffing decisions, and maintenance priorities.

The amendment also adds services under Task H: Project Management. The expanded scope includes eight additional coordination meetings, along with related agenda preparation, meeting minutes, and project coordination, from January through May 2027.

Although adoption of the updated master plan is anticipated in spring 2027, the amendment extends the agreement through December 31, 2027, to accommodate potential delays and post-adoption work.

The amendment adds $40,080 in fixed fees and up to $1,850 in reimbursable expenses, for a total increase of $41,930. This increases the total not-to-exceed contract amount from $299,010 to $340,940.

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the proposed resolution will appropriate $41,930 from the Park-In-Lieu Fund in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for City Project No. 24-20. The funding will be charged to Account No. 255-92420-57115. The amendment includes $40,080 in fixed fees and up to $1,850 in reimbursable expenses, increasing the total not-to-exceed contract amount from $299,010 to $340,940.

No General Fund funding is required.
114 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.10
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 September 22, 2026

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Gates Studio in the amount of $41,930, increasing the total not-to-exceed contract amount from $299,010 to $340,940, for additional work related to the revision and update of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, City Project No. 24-20; extending the agreement through December 31, 2027; and appropriating $41,930 from the Park-In-Lieu Fund in Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

Prepared by: Trieu Tran, Civil Engineer III
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – First Amendment

2. Draft Resolution
115 of 331

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT (C25PW1127)

BETWEEN THE CITY OF UNION CITY AND GATES STUDIO

FOR COMPREHENSIVE REVISION AND UPDATE
PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN, CITY PROJECT NO. 24-20 This First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) is effective as of this 22nd day of September, 2026 by and between the City of Union City, a municipal corporation, (“City”), Gates + Associates, Inc. (“Original Consultant”) and Gates Studio, ("Successor Consultant"), collectively referred to as the "Parties." W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, on May 13, 2025, the Parties entered into a Consulting Services Agreement (C25PW1127) (“Agreement”) wherein the Consultant will provide the City with consulting services related to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, City Project No. 24-20, in the amount of $299,010; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement due to consolidation of legal entities of the Original Consultant and the Successor Consultant, on June 29, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term of services to be provided by the Consultant, expand the scope of services to be provided by the Consultant, and increase the compensation to the Consultant; and WHEREAS, the City, the Original Consultant and the Successor Consultant desire to enter into this First Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

1. All references to Gates + Associates, Inc., in the Agreement dated May 13, 2025, shall be understood to be replaced with Gates Studio.

2. Gates Studio shall provide new certificates of insurance per Section 4 of the original agreement.

3. Section 10.10, Notices, shall be sent to:

Casey Case
Managing Partner
Gates Studio
1655 N. Main St.

Walnut Creek, CA 94569
[email protected]
116 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Gates Studio

Page 2 of 5 ends

Remittance shall be sent to:

Gates Studio
1655 N. Main Street, Suite 365
Walnut Creek, CA 94696

4. The “SCOPE OF SERVICES”, as set forth in EXHIBIT A of the Agreement, is hereby amended to include the services contained in Exhibit A of this First Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

5. The “TERM OF SERVICES,” as set forth in the first sentence of Section 1.1 of the Agreement, is hereby extended to 12/31/2027.

6. The first sentence of Section 2 “COMPENSATION” of the Agreement is hereby amended to reflect payment based upon a sum increase of Forty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Dollars ($41,930), as set forth in Exhibit B of this First Amendment. The total compensation under the Agreement including this Amendment shall not exceed a total contract amount of Three Hundred Forty Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars ($340,940). The first sentence shall now read:

City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed Three Hundred Forty Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars ($340,940), notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in Consultant's proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement.

7. The “COST PROPOSAL” as set forth in EXHIBIT B of the Agreement, is hereby amended to include the information contained in Exhibit B of this First Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

8. All other provisions of the Agreement, remain unchanged except as modified by this First Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Consultant have executed this Amendment effective as of the date hereinabove written.

THE CITY OF UNION CITY GATES STUDIO
By By
Joan Malloy Casey Case
117 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Gates Studio

Page 3 of 5 ends

City Manager Managing Partner
Attest: GATES + ASSOCIATES, INC.
___________________________ ___________________________ Thai Nam N. Pham Casey Case
City Clerk Managing Partner
Approved as to Form:
____________________________
Kristopher J. Kokotaylo
City Attorney
118 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Gates Studio

Page 4 of 5 ends

Exhibit A
Scope of Services
As part of the Union City Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the following tasks are requested to be incorporated into the project scope of work:

Task H: Project Management
The project has been requested to extend to 2027, with a proposed adoption date in Spring 2027. The project extension includes an additional 8 coordination meetings, with budget allocated to producing meeting agendas and minutes as well as coordination time spent from January 2027 through May 2027 under TASK H, SUBTASK H.1:

PROJECT MANAGEMENT.

Task I: Optional Tasks
• Task I.1: Master Plan CIP Funding Strategy conducted by BAE Urban Economics, Inc.
• Task I.2: Staffing Assessment conducted by Matrix Consulting Group • Task I.3: Parks Maintenance Operations Plan conducted by Matrix Consulting Group
119 of 331
First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement
between City of Union City and Gates Studio

Page 5 of 5 ends

Exhibit B
Cost Proposal
TASK H
TASK H.1: Project Management
Gates Studio: $5,000
Reimbursable Expenses: $100
TASK I
TASK I.1: CIP Funding Strategy
Gates Studio: $2,000
BAE Urban Economics: $15,000
TASK I.2: Staffing Assessment
Gates Studio: $2,000
Matrix Consulting Group: $7,040
Reimbursable Expenses: $875
TASK I.3: Parks Maintenance Operations Plan
Gates Studio: $2,000
Matrix Consulting Group: $7,040
Reimbursable Expenses: $875
Fixed Rate $40,080 + $1,850 reimbursable
($41,930 total)
120 of 331

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE FIRST

AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
GATES STUDIO IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,930, INCREASING THE
TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED CONTRACT AMOUNT TO $340,940, FOR

ADDITIONAL WORK RELATED TO THE REVISION AND UPDATE OF
THE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN, CITY PROJECT NO.
24-20, AND APPROPRIATING $41,930 FROM THE PARK-IN-LIEU FUND IN FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan, adopted in 1999, provides a high-level overview of the City’s parks system but no longer contains the level of data and implementation guidance needed for current park planning; and WHEREAS, on May 13, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-064, approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Gates + Associates, Inc. in the amount of $299,010 to revise and update the 1999 Parks and Recreation Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the original scope of work included eight components, Tasks A through H, and one optional component, Task I: Optional Services, which was excluded from the original agreement because of the funding available at the time; and WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment identifies Gates Studio as the successor consultant following a consolidation of Gates + Associates, Inc. and Gates Studio; and
WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment adds services under Task H: Project Management and Task I: Optional Tasks, including additional coordination meetings, a capital improvement program funding strategy, a staffing assessment, and a parks maintenance operations plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment extends the term of the agreement through December 31, 2027, and increases compensation by $41,930, consisting of $40,080 in fixed fees and up to $1,850 in reimbursable expenses, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $340,940; and
WHEREAS, the additional $41,930 will be appropriated from the Park-In-Lieu Fund in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for City Project No. 24-20.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Gates Studio, in a form approved by the City Attorney, in the amount of $41,930, increasing the total not-to-exceed contract amount from $299,010 to $340,940, for additional work related to the revision and update of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, City Project No. 24-20, and extending the agreement through December 31, 2027; and
121 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXXX
First Amendment with Gates Studio for Parks Master Plan

Page 2 of 2 ends

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby appropriates $41,930 from the Park-In-Lieu Fund in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for City Project No. 24-20; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to take all actions necessary to implement the intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on September 22, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
122 of 331
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 4 September 22, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 3.11
DATE: September 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving an Exchange of the Remaining Local Match Balance for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Bus Accelerated Infrastructure Delivery Grant Program, in the Amount of $41,208, from ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund to Measure BB (2014) Fund for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, and Amending the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to Reflect the Changes in Funding

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving an exchange of the remaining Local Match Balance for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Bus Accelerated Infrastructure Delivery Grant Program, in the amount of $41,208, from ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund to Measure BB (2014) Fund for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, and amending the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to reflect the changes in funding.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
There is no direct alignment with the Strategic Plan.

BACKGROUND
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), a regional planning agency, has been designated as the federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the state Regional Transportation Agency (RTPA) for the San Francisco Bay Area. MTC from time to time provides available regional, state, and federal funds to itself as an MPO and RTPA, and otherwise to local agencies, and these funds are used for planning and programming transportation, transit, land use, or other projects relevant to MTC or its statutory purposes.

On July 10, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5360-18, authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Master Funding Agreement with the MTC for funding Planning, Programming, Transportation, Transit, Land Use or Other Projects for Fiscal Years 2018- 2019 through 2027-2028.
123 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.11
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 4 September 22, 2026 The Bus Accelerated Infrastructure Delivery (BusAID) program is a $30 million Bay Area initiative managed by the MTC to speed up bus travel and boost reliability. Union City Transit and Public Works submitted a BusAID grant program application on February 23, 2024, with the following project description:

The pilot project consists of bus-lane striping and new signage to alert motorists to time restrictions when on-street parking is prohibited. At intersections, additional signage will be installed to clarify that the curb lane is to be used for right turns and through buses during peak periods.

The project entails repurposing the existing 7-foot parking lane and 5-foot bike lane into a 12-foot part-time bus lane during peak periods. Bicyclists may use the lane during peak periods, but are encouraged to use parallel bike routes along Arizona Street.

On May 28, 2024, the MTC informed Union City that it had approved funding the AlvaradoNiles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, in the amount of $1,703,025, which includes $1,507,688 of Non-Federal State Transit Assistance (STA) funds and a required local match of $195,337 (approximately 11.47%).

On July 9, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6328-24, accepting $1,507,688 from the MTC BusAID Grant Program for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project (City Project No. 24-21). At the same meeting, City Council approved the Local Match of $195,337 to be funded with $100,000 of ACTIA Bike & Ped Paths Fund monies and $95,337 of ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund monies from the Alvarado-Niles Multimodal Corridor Study, City Project No. K, as identified in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 to Fiscal Year 2027-2028 (see Attachment 1 for MTC Grant with Local Match Budget Summary).

On November 26, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6400-24, authorizing the City Manager to execute a Consulting Service Agreement with Kittelson & Associates, Inc., in the amount of $275,611, for the Preliminary Engineering and Final Design for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, which was funded with $243,988 in MTC BusAID Grant Fund monies, $16,184 in ACTIA Bike & Ped Paths Fund monies and $15,429 of ACTIA Streets and Roads Fund monies.

On July 9, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6328-24, authorizing the City to sign Supplement No. 4 to the Master Funding Agreement with MTC for the AlvaradoNiles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project (City Project No. 24-21).

On June 24, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-086, approving the FY 2025-2026 & FY 2026-2027 Biennial Budget and the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2025-2026 through FY 2029-2030. The Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, is listed as Item No. 27 in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and the project's funding includes both the ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund and the ACTIA Bike & Ped Paths Fund.
124 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.11
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 4 September 22, 2026 The ACTIA funding was set to sunset on July 30, 2026, but the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) authorized a one-year extension of the deadline for the remaining ACTIA funding under the Master Programs Funding. On May 12, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-059, authorizing the City to sign the One-Year Master Programs Funding Agreement with Alameda CTC for the remaining 2000 Measure B (ACTIA) Direct Local Distribution Funds, with an estimated balance of $239,000, which must be expended before June 30, 2027.

DISCUSSION
Staff has prioritized re-evaluating the use of the remaining ACTIA funding to maximize benefits to the City. As such, staff is requesting to reprogram ACTIA funds allocated to projects in the FY 2026-2027 Budget and the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2026-2027 through FY 2029-2030 to other projects that will meet the expenditure deadline.

The Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, is no longer able to meet the deadline for use of the remaining ACTIA funds; therefore, staff requests to exchange the remainder of the Local Match Balance of $41,208 from ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund to Measure BB (2014) Fund (the ACTIA Bike & Ped Paths Fund monies for this project have already been expended). If the ACTIA funds remain in the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, they are at severe risk of being lost because the project deadline is not aligned with the funding expenditure deadline outlined in Alameda CTC’s one-year Master Programs Funding extension.

The exchange of funds will require amending the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to reflect the funding changes.

FISCAL IMPACT
The remainder of the local match balance of the ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund, in the amount of $41,208, will be transferred from the Alvarado-Niles Road Part Time Transit Lanes Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, to the fund balance of ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund (Fund 253) to make it available for near-term construction projects that will meet the deadline for expenditure.

In exchange for the ACTIA funds, $41,208 will be transferred from the Measure BB (2014) Fund and appropriated to the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lanes Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21 (Account Number 264-92421-57128).

The Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2026-2027 to 2029-2030 will be amended to reflect these changes.

There is no impact on the General Fund.
125 of 331
Agenda Item No. 3.11
City Council Staff Report Page 4 of 4 September 22, 2026

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Authorizing a budget transfer, in the amount of $41,208, of ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund (Account Number 253-92421-57128) from the Alvarado-Niles Road Part Time Transit Lanes Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, to the fund balance of the ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund; and

2. Authorizing a budget transfer, in the amount of $41,208, from the Measure BB (2014) Fund, and appropriating the monies to the Alvarado-Niles Road Part Time Transit Lanes Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21 (Account Number 264-92421- 57128); and

3. Amending the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2026-2027 to 2029-2030, to reflect these changes.

Prepared by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – MTC BusAID Project Budget

2. Attachment 2 – MTC BusAID Project Fund Exchange Budget

3. Draft Resolution

4. Exhibit A – Resolution No. 2026-059
126 of 331

MTC ALVARADO-NILES ROAD PART TIME TRANSIT LANES PILOT PROJECT City Project No. 24-21
MTC BusAID Grant Program
Prepared July 2024
*City Council approved on July 2024, Local Match of $195,337 ($100,000 of Fund 2543 and $95,337 of Fund 2542)

PROJECT FUNDING AND BUDGET
Task # Deliverables/Phases
MTC Grant
Amount (Fund
4100)
Local Match
13% (Fund 2542
& 2543)* Total Cost
Original
Kittelson CSA
1 Planning/Conceptual Design $66,938 $8,673 $75,611
2 Preliminary Engineering $132,795 $17,205 $150,000
3 Environmental Documentation $44,265 $5,735 $50,000
4 Final Design $265,590 $34,410 $300,000
5 Right of Way $22,133 $2,868 $25,001
6 Construction $887,978 $115,047 $1,003,025
7 Evaluation of Pilot Project $87,989 $11,400 $99,389
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $1,507,688 $195,337 $1,703,025
Kittelson Consultant Service Agreement (Nov. 2024)
Task # Deliverables/Phases
MTC Grant
Amount (Fund
4100)
ACTA Bike & Ped
Fund 2543
($100,000)
ACTA Streets &
Roads Fund 2542
($95,337) Total Cost
1 Planning/Conceptual Design $66,938 $4,440 $4,233 $75,611 2 Preliminary Engineering $132,795 $8,808 $8,397 $150,000 3 Environmental Documentation $44,265 $2,936 $2,799 $50,000 TOTAL INITIAL CSA $243,998 $16,184 $15,429 $275,611

BREAKDOWN OF LOCAL MATCH FUNDS
Task # Deliverables/Phases
Local Match
Approx. 13%
(Fund 2542 &
Fund 2543)*
ACTA Bike & Ped
Fund 2543
($100,000)
ACTA Streets &
Roads Fund 2542
($95,337)
Total Local
Match
1 Planning/Conceptual Design $8,673 $4,440 $4,233 $8,673 2 Preliminary Engineering $17,205 $8,808 $8,397 $17,205 3 Environmental Documentation $5,735 $2,936 $2,799 $5,735 4 Final Design $34,410 $17,616 $16,794 $34,410
5 Right of Way $2,867 $1,468 $1,399 $2,867
6 Construction $115,047 $58,897 $56,150 $115,047
7 Evaluation of Pilot Project $11,400 $5,836 $5,564 $11,400 Total Local Match Breakdown $195,337 $100,000 $95,336 $195,337 127 of 331

MTC ALVARADO-NILES ROAD PART TIME TRANSIT LANES PILOT PROJECT City Project No. 24-21
MTC BusAID Grant Program
Updated September 1, 2026
*City Council approved on July 2024, Local Match of $195,337 ($100,000 of Fund 2543 and $95,337 of Fund 2542) **2000 ACTIA Funds must be expended by June 30, 2027

PROJECT FUNDING AND BUDGET
Task # Deliverables/Phases
MTC Grant
Amount (Fund
4100)
Local Match
(Fund 2542 &
2543)* Total Cost
1 Planning/Conceptual Design $66,938 $8,673 $75,611
2 Preliminary Engineering $132,795 $17,205 $150,000
3 Environmental Documentation $44,265 $5,735 $50,000
4 Final Design $265,590 $34,410 $300,000
5 Right of Way $22,133 $2,868 $25,001
6 Construction $887,978 $115,047 $1,003,025
7 Evaluation of Pilot Project $87,989 $11,400 $99,389
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $1,507,688 $195,337 $1,703,025
Kittelson Consultant Service Agreement (Nov. 2024)
Task # Deliverables/Phases
MTC Grant
Amount (Fund
4100)
2000 ACTIA Bike
& Pedestrian
Fund 254
2000 ACTIA
Streets & Roads
Fund 253 Total Cost
1 Planning/Conceptual Design $66,938 $4,440 $4,233 $75,611 2 Preliminary Engineering $132,795 $8,808 $8,397 $150,000 3 Environmental Documentation $44,265 $2,936 $2,799 $50,000 TOTAL INITIAL CSA $243,998 $16,184 $15,429 $275,611

RECOMMENDED BREAKDOWN OF REMAINING LOCAL MATCH FUNDS WITH MEASURE BB FUNDS Task # Deliverables/Phases
Local Match
Approx. 13%
Measure BB
Bike &
Pedestrian
Fund 267
Measure BB
Streets & Roads
Fund 264
Total Local
Match
1 Planning/Conceptual Design
2 Preliminary Engineering
3 Environmental Documentation
4 Final Design $34,410 $17,616 $16,794 $34,410
5 Right of Way $2,867 $1,468 $1,399 $2,867
6 Construction $115,047 $58,897 $56,150 $115,047
7 Evaluation of Pilot Project $11,400 $5,836 $5,564 $11,400 Total Local Match Breakdown $163,724 $83,817 $79,907 $163,724 128 of 331
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

APPROVING AN EXCHANGE OF THE REMAINING LOCAL MATCH

BALANCE FOR THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION’S BUS ACCELERATED INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY
GRANT PROGRAM, IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,208, FROM ACTIA
STREETS & ROADS FUND TO MEASURE BB (2014) FUND FOR THE

ALVARADO-NILES ROAD PART-TIME TRANSIT LANE PILOT
PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 24-21, AND AMENDING THE FIVEYEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN TO REFLECT THE CHANGES

IN FUNDING
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), a regional planning agency, has been designated as the federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the state Regional Transportation Agency (RTPA) for the San Francisco Bay Area; and
WHEREAS, Union City Transit and Public Works submitted a BusAID grant program application on February 23, 2024, for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, which will entail repurposing the existing 7-foot parking lane and 5-foot bike lane into a 12-foot part-time bus lane during peak congestion periods for both morning and afternoon commute hours along Alvarado-Niles Road between Almaden Boulevard and Decoto Road to reduce travel time for UC Transit and AC Transit service routes; and
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2024, MTC informed Union City that they had approved funding for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, in the amount of $1,703,025, which includes $1,507,688 of Non-Federal State Transit Assistance (STA) funds and a required local match of $195,337 (approximately

11.47%); and
WHEREAS, on July 9, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution No. 6328-24 accepting $1,507,688 from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC) BusAID Grant Program, including the Local Match of $195,337 to be funded with $100,000 of ACTIA Bike & Ped Paths Fund monies and $95,337 of ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund monies from Project K. Alvarado-Niles Multimodal Corridor Study as identified in the FiveYear Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 to Fiscal Year 2027- 2028for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21; and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6400-24, authorizing the City Manager to execute a Consulting Service Agreement with Kittelson & Associates, Inc., in the amount of $275,611, for the Preliminary Engineering and Final Design for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, which was funded with $243,988 in MTC BusAID Grant Fund monies, $16,184 in ACTIA Bike & Ped Paths Fund monies and $15,429 of ACTIA Streets and Roads Fund monies; and
129 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve Fund Exchange for Alvarado-Niles Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project

Page 2 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, on July 9, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6328-24, authorizing the City to sign Supplement No. 4 to the Master Funding Agreement with MTC for the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21; and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-086, approving the FY 2025-2026 & FY 2026-2027 Biennial Budget and the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2025-2026 through FY 2029-2030, where the Alvarado-Niles Road Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21 is listed as Item No. 27 in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and the funding for the project contains both ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund and ACTIA Bike & Ped Paths Fund; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2026, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2026-059 authorizing the City Manager to execute a One-Year Master Programs Funding Agreement with Alameda County Transportation Commission for the remaining 2000 Measure B (ACTIA) Direct Local Distribution Funds balance of about $239,000, which must be expended before June 30, 2027 (see Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, to ensure that remaining balance of the local match of $163,724 of ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund monies are spent before the June 30, 2027, deadline (the ACTIA Bike & Ped Paths Fund monies for this project have already been expended), staff requests to exchange the remaining local match balance of $41,208 in ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund with $41,208 in Measure BB (2014) Fund monies to make the ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund monies available for use for near-term construction projects that will meet the expenditure deadline.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby approves the fund exchange of the remaining local match of ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund to Measure BB (2014) Fund; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes a budget transfer, in the amount of $41,208, of ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund (Account Number 253-92421-57128) from the Alvarado-Niles Road Part Time Transit Lanes Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21, to the fund balance of the ACTIA Streets & Roads Fund to make it available for near-term construction projects that will meet the deadline; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes a budget transfer, in the amount of $41,208, from the Measure BB (2014) Fund, and appropriates the monies to the Alvarado-Niles Road Part Time Transit Lanes Pilot Project, City Project No. 24-21 (Account Number 264-92421-57128); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the amendment of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2026-2027 to 2029-2030, to reflect these changes; and
130 of 331
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve Fund Exchange for Alvarado-Niles Part-Time Transit Lane Pilot Project

Page 3 of 3 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on September 22, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – Resolution No. 2026-059
131 of 331
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-059

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A ONE-YEAR

MASTER PROGRAMS FUNDING WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE REMAINING 2000

MEASURE B DIRECT LOCAL DISTRIBUTION FUNDS
WHEREAS, voters approved the 20-year Measure B half-cent transportation sales tax in 2000; and
WHEREAS, voters approved Measure F, which authorizes a ten-dollar Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) in 2010; and
WHEREAS, voters approved the 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan (Measure BB), a half-cent transportation sales tax on November 4, 2014, that extends the existing 2000 Measure B transportation sales tax, and augments it by a one-half percent to fund projects and programs in Alameda County; and
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Committee (Alameda CTC) is responsible for dispersing Measure B, Measure BB, and VRF funds, known as Direct Local Distributions (DLD), to local jurisdictions by established formulas to support bicycle and pedestrian, local transportation (local streets and roads), transit, and paratransit programs; and
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2026, Alameda CTC approved a one-year Measure B MPFA that specifies the requirements for the DLD funds, Alameda CTC’s responsibilities, and the recipient’s requirements about any remaining 2000 Measure B balances to be expended from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027; and WHEREAS, the one-year Measure B MPFA supersedes the prior master agreements related to Measure B, as of the effective date of July 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, implementation guidelines for each program are referenced in the MPFA to guide fund eligibility and expenditures (see Exhibit A).

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Union City authorizes the City Manager to execute a One-Year MPFA with Alameda CTC for the remaining 2000 Measure B DLD funds; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Union City and its agents shall comply with the Alameda CTC MPFA; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Union City shall use the remaining Measure B funds for local transportation programs.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 132 of331
Resolution No. 2026-059
Approve Alameda CTC One-Year MPFA for Remaining Measure B

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on May 12, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Patiño, and Mayor Singh
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A - Implementation Guidelines
Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 5/13/2026
133 of331
Alameda County Transportation Commission

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Index

1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Program

2. Local Street and Road (Local Transportation) Program

3. Mass Transit Program

4. Seniors and People with Disabilities (Paratransit) Program Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 134 of 331
Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Implementation Guidelines Bicycle/Pedestrian - 1
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Bicycle/Pedestrian Program
Implementation Guidelines
Section 1. Purpose
A. To delineate the eligible uses of Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Funds authorized under Alameda County Transportation Commission Master Program Funding Agreements, these implementation guidelines have been developed to specify the requirements that local jurisdictions must follow in their use of Measure B, Measure BB and Vehicle Registration Fee Direct Local Distribution and discretionary funds. These guidelines are incorporated by reference in the Master Program Funding Agreements. All other terms and conditions for programs are contained in the agreements themselves.

The intent of the implementation guidelines is to:

1. Provide guidance on Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety funds eligible uses and expenditures.

2. Define the terms in the Master Program Funding Agreements.

3. Guide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program implementation.

Section 2. Authority
A. These Implementation Guidelines have been adopted by the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) and set forth eligible uses and expenditures for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Program funds. Alameda CTC may update these guidelines on an as-needed basis and will do so with involvement of its technical and community advisory committees (as applicable).

Exceptions to these guidelines must be requested in writing and be approved by Alameda CTC.

Section 3. Background
A. Alameda CTC developed Implementation guidelines for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Funds to clarify eligible fund uses and expenditures in association Master Programs Funding Agreements for the November 2000 voter-approved Measure B Direct Local Distribution funds (formally known as “passthrough funds”). In 2012, the Master Programs Funding Agreements were updated to include the voter approved Measure F - Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) program. In November 2014, voters approved the 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan, Measure BB, and new Master Programs Funding Agreements were subsequently developed to incorporate Measure BB funds.

Section 4. Definition of Terms
A. Alameda CTC: The Alameda County Transportation Commission is a Joint Powers Authority created by the merger of the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency, which performed long-range planning and funding for countywide transportation projects and programs, and the Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority, which administered the voter approved half-cent transportation sales taxes in Alameda County (the 1986 and 2000 approved Measure B sales tax programs) B. Capital project: A bicycle and pedestrian capital investment that typically requires the following phases:
planning/feasibility, scoping, environmental clearance, design, right-of-way, construction, and completion.

C. Complete Street: A transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, truckers, and motorists, appropriate to the function and context of the facility. Complete street concepts apply to rural, suburban, and urban areas (Caltrans definition).

D. Complete Streets Act of 2008: The California Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358) was signed into law in September 2008. It requires that local jurisdictions modify their general plans as follows:

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 135 of 331
Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Implementation Guidelines Bicycle/Pedestrian - 2
“(A) Commencing January 1, 2011, upon any substantial revision of the circulation element, the legislative body shall modify the circulation element to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of the streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan. (B) For the purposes of this paragraph, “users of streets, roads, and highways” means bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, pedestrians, users of public transportation, and seniors.”
E. Construction: Construction of a new capital project, including development of preliminary engineering and construction documents, including plans, specifications, and estimates.

F. Cost Allocation Plans (CAPs): CAPs and Indirect cost rate proposals (IDCs) are plans that provide a systematic manner to identify, accumulate, and distribute allowable direct and indirect costs to Bicycle and Pedestrian programs funded through the Alameda CTC Master Programs Funding Agreements.

G. Direct cost: A cost completely attributed to the provision of a service, operations, a program, a capital cost, or a product. These costs include documented hourly project staff labor charges (salaries, wages and benefits) which are directly and solely related to the implementation of the Alameda CTC-funded Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds, consultants, and materials. These funds may be used for travel or training if they are directly related to the implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds.

H. Direct Local Distribution Funds: Funds are allocated based upon a funding formula (such as population, registered vehicles, road miles, or a combination thereof) defined in a voter approved transportation expenditure plan, and provided to eligible jurisdictions on a regularly scheduled basis (such as a regular monthly payment).

I. Environmental Documents: Preparation of environmental documents, such as those related to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), or permits required by state or federal permitting agencies.

J. Grants: Funding for plans, programs or projects based upon a competitive call for projects, an evaluation process based on adopted evaluation criteria and allocated based upon a reimbursement basis.

K. Indirect cost: Also known as “overhead,” any cost of doing business other than direct costs. These costs include utilities, rent, administrative staff, officer's salaries, accounting department costs and personnel department costs, which are requisite for general operation of the organization, but are not directly allocable to a particular service or product.

L. Local Bicycle Master Plan/Local Pedestrian Master Plans: Locally adopted plans that, at a minimum, examine existing conditions for walking and/or bicycling, and provide recommendations on improving the walking and/or bicycling environment, and prioritize these improvements. These plans may be stand-alone bicycle and pedestrian plans or maybe a joint plan that addresses both walking and bicycling. Also referred to as an Active Transportation Plan.

M. Maintenance: Repairs, renovation, or upgrade of existing facility or infrastructure.

N. Measure BB: Alameda County voters approved Measured BB, the 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan, in November 2014. It authorizes the collection of a half-cent transportation sales tax and augments the existing 2000 Measure B sales tax program. Collection of the sales tax began on April 1, 2015.

Administered by the Alameda CTC, Measure BB funds four types of programs in 20 local jurisdictions:
bicycle and pedestrian, local streets and roads, mass transit, and paratransit.

O. Operations: Provision of services that operate transportation facilities and programs. Operations costs do not include the costs to operate community outreach or other programs not directly related to a specific transportation service, program, or product.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 136 of 331
Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Implementation Guidelines Bicycle/Pedestrian - 3
P. Planning: Identification of project and program current conditions and needs and development of strategies and plans to address the identified needs.

Q. Project Completion/Closeout: Inspection/project acceptance, final invoicing, final reporting, and processes for closing out project.

R. Scoping and Project Feasibility: Early capital project phases that identify project needs, costs and implementation feasibility.

S. Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF): Measure F, Alameda County's VRF Program, approved by the voters in November 2010. It will generate approximately $12 million per year through a $10 per year vehicle registration fee. Administered by the Alameda CTC, the VRF funds four main types of programs (with the funding distribution noted in parenthesis): local streets and roads (60 percent); transit (25 percent); local transportation technology (10 percent); and bicycle and pedestrian projects (5 percent).

Section 5. Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Fund Allocations A. These Implementation Guidelines provide guidance on two types of Bicycle and Pedestrian Fund allocation processes for Measure B, Measure BB, and Vehicle Registration Fee funds: 1) Direct Local Distribution funds and 2) Grants.

1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Direct Local Distribution (DLD) Funds a. General: The Bicycle and Pedestrian DLD Funds are distributed to cities in the county and to Alameda County to be spent on planning and construction of bicycle and pedestrian projects, and the development and implementation of bicycle and pedestrian programs. These funds are intended to expand and enhance bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Alameda County, focusing on high priority projects like gap closures and intermodal connections.
b. Eligible Uses: The Bicycle and Pedestrian DLD funds may be used for capital projects, programs, or plans that directly address bicycle and pedestrian access, convenience, safety, and usage.

Eligible uses for these funds include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1) Capital Projects, including:
a. New pedestrian facilities (e.g. sidewalks, curb ramps, countdown signals, accessible signals)
b. Improvements to existing pedestrian facilities
c. New bikeways (such as bicycle routes, boulevards, lanes, multi-use pathways)
d. Improvements or upgrades to existing bikeways
e. Maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian facilities
f. Crossing improvements (at intersections, interchanges, railroads, freeways, etc.) for pedestrians and bicyclists
g. Bicycle parking facilities, including construction, maintenance and operations
h. ADA on-street improvements
i. Signage for pedestrians and/or bicyclists
Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 137 of 331
Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Implementation Guidelines Bicycle/Pedestrian - 4
j. Pedestrian and bicycle access improvements to, from and at transit facilities
k. Traffic calming projects
l. All phases of capital projects, including feasibility studies, planning, and environmental
2) Development and updates of Local Bicycle and/or Pedestrian Master Plans (Active Transportation Plans)
3) Compliance with complete streets policies, to comply with the California Complete Streets Act of 2008, as specified in Section 6. 4) Design and implementation of education, enforcement, outreach, and promotion programs
5) Direct staff and consultant costs to develop, plan, implement, operate, and maintain the bicycle and pedestrian projects and programs. 6) Maintenance of the portion of the street most often used for bicycling (such as bicycle lanes)
7) Bicycle/pedestrian capital projects on non-city property, such as on school district property.
8) Direct staff and consultant costs that support eligible activities, including the end-of-year compliance report
9) Crossing guards
10) Direct staff training costs directly related to implementation of projects, plans, or programs implemented with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Funds
c. Ineligible Uses: The following is a list of ineligible uses of Bicycle/Pedestrian DLD funds:
1) Non-transportation projects such as fees charged to capital construction projects for services or amenities not related to transportation 2) Repaving of the entire roadway (see “Eligible Uses” above for exceptions) 3) Capital projects, programs, or plans that do not directly address bicycle and pedestrian access, convenience, safety, and usage
4) Projects or programs that exclusively serve city/county staff 5) Indirect costs, unless the recipient submits an independently audited/approved Indirect Cost Allocation Plan
d. List of Projects/Programs: All projects and programs that use DLD funds must receive governing board approval prior to the jurisdiction expending the DLD funding on the project/program. This approval allows the opportunity for the public to provide input on planning for bicycle and pedestrian safety. These projects and programs may be included in any of the following, as long as they have been adopted by the jurisdiction’s governing board:
1) List of projects intended to be funded by DLD funds
Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 138 of 331
Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Implementation Guidelines Bicycle/Pedestrian - 5
2) Local Bicycle and/or Pedestrian Master Plan with priority projects 3) Capital Improvement Program
4) A resolution, such as for a grant application submittal

2. Bicycle and Pedestrian Grant Funds
a. Alameda CTC will adopt Grant Program Guidelines before each grant cycle that will establish the guiding policies for that grant cycle and will publicize each grant funding cycle. Alameda CTC will administer a bicycle and pedestrian discretionary grant program using a portion of the available funds
b. Local jurisdictions, transit operators and Community Based Organizations (CBO) in Alameda County may be eligible for these competitive funds as determined by the Alameda CTC discretionary processes and the Grant Program Guidelines.

Section 6. Complete Streets Policy Requirement
A. To receive DLD funds, local jurisdictions must do both of the following with respect to Complete Street policies:

1. Have an adopted complete streets policy

2. Comply with the California Complete Streets Act of 2008. The California Complete Streets Act (AB1358) requires that local general plans do the following:
a. Commencing January 1, 2011, upon any substantial revision of the circulation element, the legislative body shall modify the circulation element to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of the streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan. b. For the purposes of this paragraph, “users of streets, roads, and highways” means bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, pedestrians, users of public transportation, and seniors.

Section 7. Local Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan Requirement A. To receive DLD funds, local jurisdictions must do all of the following with respect to local bicycle and pedestrian master plans.

1. Have an adopted Local Pedestrian Master Plan AND Local Bicycle Master Plan OR have an adopted combined Local Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan (Active Transportation Plan); or demonstrate that the plan is being developed and will be adopted.

2. Each plan must be updated, at a minimum, every five years.

3. Each plan must include core elements to ensure that the plan is effective, and that plans throughout the county are comparable, to the extent that is reasonable, to facilitate countywide planning. Alameda CTC will develop and maintain guidelines outlining these core elements.

The Alameda CTC will provide technical assistance and consideration for funding for local jurisdictions to meet these requirements through the competitive grants. Jurisdictions may also use DLD funds for the development of local bicycle and pedestrian master plans.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 139 of 331
Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Implementation Guidelines Bicycle/Pedestrian - 6
Section 8. Advancement of Direct Local Distribution Funds A. Alameda CTC may consider advancing future Direct Local Distribution funds, with the goal of seeing improvements made in the near term. If a jurisdiction is interested in this option, a written request to Alameda CTC must include a description of the project, scope, schedule, the amount of funds requested, the anticipated timing of when funds are required, and justification for the request. Requests will be considered on an individual basis.

Section 9. Adoption of Implementation Guidelines
A. Implementation Guidelines are adopted by Alameda CTC on an as-needed basis. Changes to Implementation Guidelines will be brought through Alameda CTC’s Technical Advisory Committee for review and comment, as well as any other Alameda CTC committees as necessary, before changes are adopted by the Alameda CTC’s Commission.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 140 of 331
Alameda CTC Local Streets and Roads Program Implementation Guidelines LSR - 1
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Local Streets and Roads (Local Transportation) Program
Implementation Guidelines
Section 1. Purpose
A. To delineate the eligible uses of Local Streets and Roads funds authorized under Alameda County Transportation Commission Master Program Funding Agreements, these implementation guidelines have been developed to specify the requirements that local jurisdictions must follow in their use of Measure B, Measure BB, and Vehicle Registration Fees (VRF) Direct Local Distribution funds. These guidelines are incorporated by reference in the Master Programs Funding Agreements. All other terms and conditions for programs are contained in the agreements themselves. The intent of the implementation guidelines is to:

1. Provide guidance on Local Streets and Roads funds eligible uses and expenditures.

2. Define the terms in the Master Programs Funding Agreements.

3. Guide Local Streets and Roads Program implementation.

Alameda CTC may update these guidelines on an as-needed basis and will do so with involvement of its technical and community advisory committees (as applicable). Exceptions to these guidelines must be requested in writing and be approved by the Alameda CTC Commission.

Section 3. Background
A. Alameda CTC developed Implementation Guidelines for the Local Streets and Roads (Local Transportation) funds to clarify eligible fund uses and expenditures in association with Master Program Funding Agreements for the November 2000 voter-approved Measure B Direct Local Distribution funds (formally known as “pass-through funds”. The Expenditure Plan allocates 22.34 percent of Measure B funds for Local Streets and Roads programs and projects. In 2012, the Master Programs Funding Agreements were updated to include the voter approved 2010 Measure F - Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) program. The VRF includes 60 percent of net revenues for a Local Streets and Roads Program. In November 2014, voters approved the 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan, Measure BB, which allocates 20.00 percent of funds for a Local Streets and Roads program. New Master Programs Funding Agreements were subsequently developed to incorporate Measure BB funds.

Section 4. Definition of Terms
A. Alameda CTC: The Alameda County Transportation Commission is a Joint Powers Authority created by the merger of the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency, which performed long-range planning and funding for countywide transportation projects and programs, and the Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority, which administered the voter-approved, half-cent transportation sales taxes in Alameda County (the Measure B sales tax programs approved in 1986 and 2000).

B. Bike parking: Bike racks and lockers, bike shelters, attended bike parking facilities, and bike parking infrastructure.

C. Bikeways and multiuse paths: Bike lanes, bike boulevards, side paths, bike routes, multiuse pathways, at-grade bike crossings, and maintenance of bikeway facilities.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 141 of 331
Alameda CTC Local Streets and Roads Program Implementation Guidelines LSR - 2
D. Bridges and tunnels: Crossings above or below grade for bicycles, pedestrians, and/or autos and transit.

E. Capital project: A capital investment that typically requires the following phases: planning/feasibility, scoping, environmental clearance, design, right-of-way, construction, and completion.

F. Complete Street: A transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, truckers, and motorists, appropriate to the function and context of the facility. Complete street concepts apply to rural, suburban, and urban areas. (Caltrans definition) G. Complete Streets Act of 2008: The California Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358) was signed into law in September 2008. It requires that local jurisdictions modify their general plans as follows:
“(A) Commencing January 1, 2011, upon any substantial revision of the circulation element, the legislative body shall modify the circulation element to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of the streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan. (B) For the purposes of this paragraph, “users of streets, roads, and highways” means bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, pedestrians, users of public transportation, and seniors.”
H. Construction: Construction of a new capital project, including development of preliminary engineering and construction documents, including plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E).

I. Cost Allocation Plans (CAPs): CAPs and indirect cost (IDC) rate proposals are plans that provide a systematic manner to identify, accumulate, and distribute allowable direct and indirect costs to Local Streets and Roads programs funded through the Alameda CTC Master Programs Funding Agreements.

J. Direct cost: A cost completely attributed to the provision of a service, operations, a program, a capital cost, or a product. These costs include documented hourly project staff labor charges (salaries, wages, and benefits) that are directly and solely related to the implementation of the Alameda CTC-funded Local Streets and Roads projects, consultants, and materials. These funds may be used for travel or training if they are directly related to the implementation of the Local Streets and Roads funds.

K. Direct Local Distribution Funds: Funds are allocated based upon a funding formula (such as population, registered vehicles, roadmiles, or a combination thereof) defined in a voter approved measure and provided to eligible jurisdictions on a regularly schedule basis (such as a regular monthly payment).

L. Education and promotion: Marketing, education, information, outreach, and promotional campaigns and programs.

M. Environmental documents: Preparation of environmental documents, such as those related to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), or permits required by state or federal permitting agencies.

N. Equipment and new vehicles: Purchase or lease of vehicles and equipment for service improvements, such as information dissemination, fare collection, etc.

O. Grants: Funding for plans, programs, or projects based on a competitive call for projects; evaluated based on adopted evaluation criteria; and allocated based on a reimbursement basis.

P. Indirect cost: Also known as “overhead,” any cost of doing business other than direct costs. These costs include utilities, rent, administrative staff, officers’ salaries, accounting department costs, and Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 142 of 331
Alameda CTC Local Streets and Roads Program Implementation Guidelines LSR - 3
personnel department costs, which are requisite for general operation of the organization but are not directly allocable to a particular service or product.

Q. Maintenance: Repairs, renovation, or upgrade of existing facility or infrastructure.

R. Measure B: Alameda County’s half-cent transportation sales tax, originally approved in 1986, and reauthorized by voters in November 2000. Collection of the sales tax began on April 1, 2002.

Administered by the Alameda CTC, Measure B funds four types of programs in 20 local jurisdictions:
bicycle and pedestrian, local streets and roads, mass transit, and paratransit.

S. Measure BB: Alameda County voters approved Measured BB, the 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan, in November 2014. It authorizes the collection of a half-cent transportation sales tax and augments the existing 2000 Measure B sales tax program. Collection of the sales tax began on April 1, 2015. Administered by the Alameda CTC, Measure BB funds four types of programs in 20 local jurisdictions: bicycle and pedestrian, local streets and roads, mass transit, and paratransit.

T. Operations: Provision of services that operate transportation facilities and programs. Operations costs do not include the costs to operate community outreach or other programs not directly related to a specific transportation service, program, or product.

U. Pedestrian crossing improvements: At-grade pedestrian crossing improvements such as crosswalks, roadway/geometric changes, or reconfiguration specifically benefiting pedestrians.

V. Planning: Identification of project and program current conditions and needs and development of strategies and plans to address the identified needs.

W. Planning area: Four geographical sub-areas of the county (Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, and 4). The subareas of the county are defined by the Alameda CTC as follows:

1. Planning Area 1 – North Area: Cities of Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland and Piedmont

2. Planning Area 2 – Central Area: Cities of Hayward and San Leandro, and the unincorporated areas of Castro Valley and San Lorenzo, as well as other unincorporated lands in that area

3. Planning Area 3 – South Area: Cities of Fremont, Newark, and Union City

4. Planning Area 4 – East Area: Cities of Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton, and all unincorporated lands in that area
X. Project completion/closeout: Inspection/project acceptance, final invoicing, final reporting, and the processes for closing out a project.

Y. Scoping and project feasibility: Early capital project phases that identify project needs, costs, and implementation feasibility.

Z. Sidewalks and ramps: New sidewalks, sidewalk maintenance, curb ramps, and stairs/ramps for pedestrian and Americans with Disabilities Act access.

AA. Signage: Warning, regulatory, wayfinding, or informational signage.

BB. Signals: New traffic signals or crossing signals, signal upgrades, countdown signals, audible signals, or signal timing improvements.

CC. Street resurfacing and maintenance: Repaving and resurfacing of on-street surfaces, including striping.

DD. Traffic calming: Infrastructure primarily aimed at slowing down motor vehicle traffic.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 143 of 331
Alameda CTC Local Streets and Roads Program Implementation Guidelines LSR - 4
EE. Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF): Measure F, Alameda County’s VRF Program, approved by the voters in November 2010 with 63 percent of the vote. It will generate approximately $12 million per year through a $10 per year vehicle registration fee. Administered by the Alameda CTC, the VRF funds four main types of programs and the distribution percentage is as follows: local streets and roads (60 percent); transit (25 percent); local transportation technology (10 percent); and bicycle and pedestrian projects (5 percent).

Section 5. Local Streets and Roads Fund Allocations
A. These Implementation Guidelines provide guidance on the Local Streets and Roads (LSR) Fund allocation process for Measure B, Measure BB and VRF Direct Local Distribution funds.

1. Measure B/BB Local Streets and Roads Direct Local Distribution (DLD) Funds a. General: Alameda CTC distributes Measure B and Measure BB Local Streets and Roads DLD funds to cities in the county and to Alameda County to be spent on transportation capital improvements for surface streets and arterial roads, and maintenance and upkeep of local streets and roads, including repaving streets, filling potholes, and upgrading local transportation infrastructure.

These funds are intended to maintain and improve local streets and roads in Alameda County, and may be used for any local transportation need based on local priorities, including streets and roads projects, local transit projects, bicycle and pedestrian projects, projects (sponsored by others) that require local agency support, and other transportation uses as approved through a public process by the jurisdiction. b. Eligible Uses: Measure B/BB DLD funds may be used for capital projects, programs, maintenance, or operations that directly improve local streets and roads and local transportation. Eligible uses for these funds include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1) Capital projects, including:
a) All phases of capital projects, including feasibility studies, planning, and environmental
b) Upgrades to or installation of new local streets and roads infrastructure including installation of streets, roads, and highways c) Street resurfacing and maintenance including repaving and resurfacing of on-street surfaces including striping
d) Improvements or upgrades to bridges and tunnels
e) Installation of or upgrades to sidewalks and curb ramps f) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) on-street improvements, including sidewalk upgrades and curb ramp installations g) Purchase or lease of equipment or new vehicles for local streets and roads improvements
h) Crossing improvements including traffic signals, signage, and traffic lights (at intersections, interchanges, railroads, freeways, etc.) for drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists
Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 144 of 331
Alameda CTC Local Streets and Roads Program Implementation Guidelines LSR - 5
i) Improvements to or installation of new pedestrian facilities (e.g., sidewalks, curb ramps, countdown signals, accessible signals, at-grade bike crossings)
j) Improvements or upgrades to or installation of new bikeways (such as bicycle routes, boulevards, lanes, multi-use pathways) k) Maintenance of or installation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including construction, maintenance, and operations of bike parking facilities.
l) Pedestrian and bicycle access improvements to, from and at transit facilities
m) Traffic calming projects
2) Transit system operations, operations of traffic signal system controls and interconnections, and corridor monitoring and management 3) Mass transit project operations including bus, ferry, shuttle, rail, and Welfare to Work services
4) Paratransit services
5) Direct staff and consultant costs that support eligible activities, including the end-of-year compliance report
6) Direct staff training costs directly related to implementation of projects or programs implemented with the Local Streets and Roads Funds c. Ineligible Uses: The following is a list of ineligible uses of LSR DLD funds:
1) Non-transportation projects such as fees charged to capital construction projects for services or amenities not related to transportation 2) Capital projects, programs, maintenances, or operations that do not directly improve local streets and roads and local transportation 3) Projects or programs that exclusively serve city/county staff 4) Indirect costs, unless the RECIPIENT submits an independently audited/approved Indirect Cost Allocation Plan
d. List of Projects/Programs: All projects and programs that use LSR DLD funds must receive governing board approval prior to the jurisdiction expending the DLD funding on the project/program. This approval allows the opportunity for the public to provide input on planning for local streets and roads projects. These projects and programs must be included in any of the following, as long as they have been adopted by the jurisdiction’s governing board:
1) List of projects intended to be funded by DLD funds
2) Local Streets and Roads Master Plan with priority projects 3) Capital Improvement Program
4) A resolution, such as for a grant application submittal Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 145 of 331
Alameda CTC Local Streets and Roads Program Implementation Guidelines LSR - 6

2. VRF Local Streets and Roads DLD Funds
a. General: Alameda CTC distributes VRF Local Streets and Roads DLD Funds to cities in the county and to Alameda County to be spent on transportation capital improvements for surface streets and arterial roads, and maintenance and upkeep of local streets and roads. These funds are intended to maintain and improve local streets and roads as well as a broad range of facilities in Alameda County (from local to arterial facilities).
b. Eligible Uses: The VRF Local Streets and Roads DLD funds may be used for improving, maintaining, and rehabilitating local roads and traffic signals. It will also incorporate the Complete Streets practice that makes local roads safe for all modes, including bicyclists and pedestrians, and accommodate transit. Eligible uses for these funds include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1) Street repaving and rehabilitation, including curbs, gutters and drains 2) Traffic signal maintenance and upgrades, including bicyclist and pedestrian treatments
3) Signage and striping on roadways, including traffic and bicycle lanes and crosswalks
4) Sidewalk repair and installation
5) Bus stop improvements, including bus pads, turnouts and striping 6) Improvements to roadways at rail crossings, including grade separations and safety protection devices
7) Improvements to roadways with truck or transit routing c. Ineligible Uses: The following is a list of ineligible uses of VRF Local Streets and Roads DLD funds:
1) Non-transportation projects such as fees charged to capital construction projects for services or amenities that are not related to transportation 2) Projects or programs that are not directly related to streets and roads improvements
3) Projects or programs that exclusively serve city/county staff 4) Indirect costs, unless the RECIPIENT submits an independently audited/approved Indirect Cost Allocation Plan.

Section 6. Complete Streets Policy Requirement
A. To receive DLD funds, local jurisdictions must do both of the following with respect to Complete Streets policies:

1. Have an adopted Complete Streets policy.

2. Comply with the California Complete Streets Act of 2008. The California Complete Streets Act (AB1358) requires that local general plans do the following:
a. Commencing January 1, 2011, upon any substantial revision of the circulation element, the legislative body shall modify the circulation element to plan for a Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 146 of 331
Alameda CTC Local Streets and Roads Program Implementation Guidelines LSR - 7
balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of the streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan. b. For the purposes of this paragraph, “users of streets, roads, and highways” means bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, pedestrians, users of public transportation, and seniors.

Section 7. Pavement Condition Index Reporting
A. To receive DLD funds, local jurisdictions must do both of the following with respect to the reporting of an agency’s pavement condition (PCI) index:

1. Annually report on the citywide pavement condition index (PCI), which rates the “health” of local streets from 1 to 100, in the Annual Program Compliance Report Form. Where applicable, this information will be consistent with material provided for MTC reporting requirements.

2. If the PCI falls below a total average index of 60 (fair condition), specify in the Annual Program Compliance Report what funding amounts, policies, or other needs are required to enable increasing the recipient’s PCI.

Section 8. Advancement of Direct Local Distribution Funds A. Alameda CTC may consider advancing future Direct Local Distribution funds, with the goal of seeing improvements made in the near term. If a jurisdiction is interested in this option, a written request to Alameda CTC must include a description of the project, scope, schedule, the amount of funds requested, the anticipated timing of when funds are required, and justification for the request. Requests will be considered on an individual basis.

Section 9. Adoption of Implementation Guidelines
A. Implementation Guidelines are adopted by Alameda CTC on an as-needed basis. Changes to Implementation Guidelines will be brought through the Alameda CTC’s Technical Advisory Committee for review and comment, as well as any other Alameda CTC committees as necessary, before changes are adopted by the Alameda CTC Commission.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 147 of 331
Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines Transit - 1
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Mass Transit Program
Implementation Guidelines
Section 1. Purpose
A. To delineate eligible uses of Mass Transit funds authorized under Alameda County Transportation Commission Master Program Funding Agreements, these implementation guidelines have been developed to specify the requirements that local jurisdictions must follow in their use of Measure B, Measure BB, and Vehicle Registration Fees (VRF) Direct Local Distributions and discretionary funds.

These guidelines are incorporated by reference in the Master Programs Funding Agreements. All other terms and conditions for programs are contained in the agreements themselves. The intent of the implementation guidelines is to:

1. Provide guidance on Mass Transit funds eligible uses and expenditures.

2. Define the terms in the Master Programs Funding Agreements.

3. Guide Mass Transit Program implementation.

Section 2. Authority
A. These Implementation Guidelines have been adopted by the Alameda County Transportation Commission and set forth eligible uses and expenditures for the Mass Transit funds. Alameda CTC may update these guidelines on an as-needed basis and will do so with involvement of its technical and community advisory committees (as applicable). Exceptions to these guidelines must be requested in writing and be approved by the Alameda CTC Commission.

Section 3. Background
Alameda CTC developed Implementation Guidelines for the Mass Transit funds to clarify eligible fund uses and expenditures in association with Master Programs Funding Agreements for the November 2000 voter-approved Measure B Direct Local Distribution funds (formally known as “pass-through funds”). In 2012, the Master Programs Funding Agreements were updated to include the voter approved 2010 Measure F - Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) program. In November 2014, voters approved the 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan, Measure BB, and new Master Programs Funding Agreements were subsequently developed to incorporate Measure BB funds.

Section 4. Definition of Terms
A. Alameda CTC: The Alameda County Transportation Commission is a Joint Powers Authority created by the merger of the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency, which performed long-range planning and funding for countywide transportation projects and programs, and the Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority, which administered the voter-approved, half-cent transportation sales taxes in Alameda County (the Measure B sales tax programs approved in 1986 and 2000).

B. Capital project: A capital investment that typically requires the following phases: planning/feasibility, scoping, environmental clearance, design, right-of-way, construction, and completion.

C. Construction: Construction of a new capital project, including development of preliminary engineering and construction documents, including plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E).

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 148 of 331
Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines Transit - 2
D. Cost Allocation Plans (CAPs): CAPs and indirect cost (IDC) rate proposals are plans that provide a systematic manner to identify, accumulate, and distribute allowable direct and indirect costs to Mass Transit programs funded through the Alameda CTC Master Programs Funding Agreements.

E. Direct cost: A cost completely attributed to the provision of a service, operations, a program, a capital cost, or a product. These costs include documented hourly project staff labor charges (salaries, wages, and benefits) that are directly and solely related to the implementation of Alameda CTC-funded Mass Transit projects, consultants, and materials. These funds may be used for travel or training if they are directly related to the implementation of the Mass Transit funds.

F. Direct Local Distribution funds: Funds allocated based on a funding formula (such as population, registered vehicles, road miles, or a combination thereof) defined in a voter-approved measure and provided to eligible jurisdictions on a regularly scheduled basis (such as a regular monthly payment).

G. Education and promotion: Marketing, education, information, outreach, and promotional campaigns and programs.

H. Environmental documents: Preparation of environmental documents, such as those related to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), or permits required by state or federal permitting agencies.

I. Equipment and new vehicles: Purchase or lease of vehicles. Equipment for service improvements, such as information dissemination, fare collection, etc.

J. Express bus service: Either of these types of rapid bus service:

1. Service within zones with a defined pick-up area, nonstop express bus service, and a defined drop-off zone.

2. Service that provides a simple route layout, has frequent service and fewer stops than regular fixed route service, and may include level boarding, bus priority at traffic signals, signature identification of the rapid buses such as color-coded buses and stops, and enhanced stations.

K. Grants: Funding for plans, programs, or projects based on a competitive call for projects; evaluated based on adopted evaluation criteria; and allocated based on a reimbursement basis.

L. Indirect cost: Also known as “overhead,” any cost of doing business other than direct costs. These costs include utilities, rent, administrative staff, officers’ salaries, accounting department costs, and personnel department costs, which are requisite for general operation of the organization but are not directly allocable to a particular service or product.

M. Maintenance: Repairs, renovation, or upgrade of existing facility or infrastructure.

N. Measure B: Alameda County’s half-cent transportation sales tax, originally approved in 1986, and reauthorized by voters in November 2000. Collection of the sales tax began on April 1, 2002.

Administered by the Alameda CTC, Measure B funds four types of programs in 20 local jurisdictions:
bicycle and pedestrian, local streets and roads, mass transit, and paratransit.

O. Measure BB: Alameda County voters approved Measured BB, the 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan, in November 2014. It authorizes the collection of a half-cent transportation sales tax and augments the existing 2000 Measure B sales tax program. Collection of the sales tax began on April 1, 2015. Administered by the Alameda CTC, Measure BB funds four types of programs in 20 local jurisdictions: bicycle and pedestrian, local streets and roads, mass transit, and paratransit.

P. Operations: Provision of services that operate transportation facilities and programs. Operations costs do not include the costs to operate community outreach or other programs not directly related to a specific transportation service, program, or product.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 149 of 331
Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines Transit - 3
Q. Planning: Identification of project and program current conditions and needs and development of strategies and plans to address the identified needs.

R. Planning area: Four geographical sub-areas of the county (Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, and 4). The subareas of the county are defined by the Alameda CTC as follows:

1. Planning Area 1 – North Area: Cities of Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland and Piedmont

2. Planning Area 2 – Central Area: Cities of Hayward and San Leandro, and the unincorporated areas of Castro Valley and San Lorenzo, as well as other unincorporated lands in that area

3. Planning Area 3 – South Area: Cities of Fremont, Newark, and Union City

4. Planning Area 4 – East Area: Cities of Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton, and all unincorporated lands in that area
S. Project completion/closeout: Inspection/project acceptance, final invoicing, final reporting, and the processes for closing out a project.

T. Safety improvements: Safety or security improvements for operators, passengers, service users, facilities, and infrastructure or property.

U. Scoping and project feasibility: Early capital project phases that identify project needs, costs, and implementation feasibility.

V. Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF): Measure F, Alameda County’s VRF Program, approved by the voters in November 2010 with 63 percent of the vote. It will generate approximately $12 million per year through a $10 per year vehicle registration fee. Administered by the Alameda CTC, the VRF funds four main types of programs and the distribution percentage is as follows: local streets and roads (60 percent); transit (25 percent); local transportation technology (10 percent); and bicycle and pedestrian projects (5 percent).

W. Welfare to Work: Transit services to enhance transportation opportunities for persons making the transition from welfare to work.

Section 5. Mass Transit Fund Allocations
A. These Implementation Guidelines provide guidance on the Mass Transit Fund allocation process for Mass Transit Direct Local Distribution funds and Measure B Express Bus Services Grant Program and VRF Transit for Congestion Relief Program funds.

1. Mass Transit Direct Local Distribution (DLD) Funds
a. General: Alameda CTC distributes Mass Transit DLD Funds to transit operators in Alameda County to be spent on maintenance of transit services, restoration of service cuts, expansion of transit services, and passenger safety and security. b. Eligible Uses: The Mass Transit DLD funds may be used for capital projects, programs, maintenance, or operations that directly improve mass transit services. Eligible uses for these funds include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1) Capital projects, including:
a) All phases of capital projects, including feasibility studies, planning, and environmental
Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 150 of 331
Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines Transit - 4
b) Upgrades to or expansions to bus, ferry, rail, and shuttle infrastructure
c) Purchase or lease of equipment or new vehicles for transit services 2) Mass transit system operations and services, including commuter rail; express, local, and feeder bus; and ferry
3) Paratransit services
4) Welfare to Work services
5) Direct staff and consultant costs to develop, plan, implement, operate and maintain transit projects and programs
6) Direct staff and consultant costs that support eligible activities, including the end-of-year compliance report
7) Direct staff training costs directly related to implementation of projects or programs implemented with the Mass Transit Funds
c. Ineligible Uses: The following is a list of ineligible uses of Mass Transit DLD funds:
1) Non-transportation projects such as fees charged to capital construction projects for services or amenities not related to transportation 2) Capital projects, programs, maintenances, or operations that does not directly improve mass transit services
3) Projects or programs that exclusively serve city/county staff 4) Indirect costs, unless the RECIPIENT submits an independently audited/approved Indirect Cost Allocation Plan.

2. Measure B Express Bus Services Grant Program Funds
a. The Measure B Expenditure Plan dedicates 0.7 percent of net revenues for the Countywide Express Bus Service fund for express bus service projects. The Alameda CTC will administer a Measure B Countywide Express Bus Services discretionary grant program. The Alameda CTC will adopt Grant Program Guidelines before each grant cycle that will establish the guiding policies for that grant cycle and will widely publicize each grant funding cycle.
b. Two agencies are eligible to receive express bus services grant funds:
1) Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit)
2) Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA)
Fund recipients must enter into a separate agreement with Alameda CTC.

3. VRF Transit for Congestion Relief Program Funds
a. The VRF Expenditure Plan dedicates 25 percent of net revenues for transit projects that provide congestion relief. Alameda CTC awards VRF Transit for Congestion Relief Grant Program funds on a discretionary basis. These funds are intended to make it easier for drivers to use public transportation, make the existing transit system more efficient and effective, and improve access to schools and jobs. The goal of this program is to decrease automobile usage and thereby reduce both localized and areaDocusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 151 of 331
Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines Transit - 5
wide congestion and air pollution. Fund recipients must enter into a separate agreement with Alameda CTC.
b. Eligible Uses: VRF Transit for Congestion Relief Grant Program Guidelines provide program eligibility and fund usage guidelines and requirements, definitions of terms, evaluation criteria, award details, and monitoring requirements.

Section 6. Advancement of Direct Local Distribution Funds A. Alameda CTC may consider advancing future Direct Local Distribution funds, with the goal of seeing improvements made in the near term. If a jurisdiction is interested in this option, a written request to Alameda CTC must include a description of the project, scope, schedule, the amount of funds requested, the anticipated timing of when funds are required, and justification for the request. Requests will be considered on an individual basis.

Section 7. Adoption of Implementation Guidelines
A. Implementation Guidelines are adopted by Alameda CTC on an as-needed basis. Changes to Implementation Guidelines will be brought through the Alameda CTC’s Technical Advisory Committee for review and comment, as well as any other Alameda CTC committees as necessary, before changes are adopted by the Alameda CTC Commission.

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 152 of 331
Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines Transit - 1
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Mass Transit Program
Implementation Guidelines
Section 1. Purpose
A. To delineate eligible uses of Mass Transit funds authorized under Alameda County Transportation Commission Master Program Funding Agreements, these implementation guidelines have been developed to specify the requirements that local jurisdictions must follow in their use of Measure B, Measure BB, and Vehicle Registration Fees (VRF) Direct Local Distributions and discretionary funds.

1. Provide guidance on Mass Transit funds eligible uses and expenditures.

2. Define the terms in the Master Programs Funding Agreements.

3. Guide Mass Transit Program implementation.

Section 4. Definition of Terms
A. Alameda CTC: The Alameda County Transportation Commission is a Joint Powers Authority created by the merger of the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency, which performed long-range planning and funding for countywide transportation projects and programs, and the Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority, which administered the voter-approved, half-cent transportation sales taxes in Alameda County (the Measure B sales tax programs approved in 1986 and 2000).

B. Capital project: A capital investment that typically requires the following phases: planning/feasibility, scoping, environmental clearance, design, right-of-way, construction, and completion.

C. Construction: Construction of a new capital project, including development of preliminary engineering and construction documents, including plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E).

Docusign Envelope ID: 29BDF0A0-AB65-882B-8071-4F5CEE1CF740 153 of 331
Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines Transit - 2
D. Cost Allocation Plans (CAPs): CAPs and indirect cost (IDC) rate proposals are plans that provide a systematic manner to identify, accumulate, and distribute allowable direct and indirect costs to Mass Transit programs funded through the Alameda CTC Master Programs Funding Agreements.