Upland City Council
November 14, 2022

U P L A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L

A G E N D A
N ove mbe r 1 4 , 2 0 2 2
C ity C ou n ci l C h a mbe r

B I L L V E L T O, M A Y O R

S H A N N A N M A U S T, M A Y O R P R O T E M

J A N I C E E L L I O T T, C O U N C I L M E M B E R
C A R L O S A . G A R C I A , C O U N C I L M E M B E R

R U D Y Z U N I G A , C O U N C I L M E M B E R

M I C H A E L B L A Y , C I T Y M A N A G E R
S T E P H E N P . D E I T S C H , C I T Y A T T O R N E Y

D I S R U P T I O N O F M E E T I N G S
I n d ivid uals wh o d em onstrate d isru p tive cond uct d urin g C ity C ou ncil m eetin g s th at p revent th e C ity C oun cil from cond ucting its m eeting in an ord erly m ann er are g u ilty of a m isd em ean or as stated in P C 40 3, d isru p tin g a p ub lic m eeting , and are sub ject to rem oval from th e ch am b er or arrest.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
5 :3 0 P M - C lose d S e ssion

1.C A L L T O O R D E R A N D R O L L C A L L

2.A D D I T I O N S -D E L E T I O N S T O A G E N D A

3.O R A L C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
T his is a tim e for an y citizen to c om m en t on it em l is ted on th e cl osed session ag end a on ly. A n yon e wish in g to ad d ress t he leg is lat ive b od y is req u est ed to sub m it a sp eaker card t o th e C ity C l erk at or p rior to sp eaking . T h e sp eakers are req u ested to keep th eir com m en ts to n o m ore t h an th ree (3 ) m inu tes. Th e use of visu al aid s w ill b e in clud ed in the tim e lim it.

4.C L O S E D S E S S I O N

A .C LO S E D S E S S I O N C O N F E R E N C E W I T H L E G A L C O U N S E L - L I A B I L I T Y

C L A I M
G overn m en t C od e S ection 54 95 6.9 (d )(2 )
C laim ant:Sylvia S anchez

A g ency:C ity of Up lan d
B.C LO S E D S E S S I O N C O N F E R E N C E W I T H R E A L P R O P E RT Y N E G OT I A TO R S C alifornia G overn m en t C od e S ection 54 95 6.8
P rop erty: 53 1 E . 1 3th S treet, U p land , C A 91 78 6; A P N : 1 04 5-3 92 -43 C ity
N eg otiators:

C ity M anag er M ich ael B lay, D evelop m en t S ervi ces D irector Rob ert D alq uest, and E conom ic D evelop m ent C oord in ator M elecio P icazo
N eg otiating
Party:

R .W. S elb y & C om p an y, I n c.

Un d er
N eg otiation :

P rice and term s of p aym ent
C .C LO S E D S E S S I O N P U B L I C E M P LOY E E P E R F O R M A N C E E V A L U A T I O N P u rsuan t to G overn m en t C od e S ection 54 95 7
Title: C ity M anag er
* * * * * * * * * * * *
7:00 P M

5.I N V O C A T I O N
Pastor L aurie B aiz, L ife B ib le Fellowship C hu rch

6.P L E D G E O F A L L E G I A N C E

7.P R E S E N T A T I O N S
Recog n ition of Up lan d Resid ents S erving in th e M ilitary P roclam ation d eclaring S at urd ay, N ovem b er 2 6, 2 02 2 as S m all B usin ess S atu rd ay, accep ted b y th e H istoric D ow ntow n U p land M erch ant's A ssociation Recog n ition of D etective Ran d all L ayne an d O fficer G ab riel G arcia b y Police C hief B lanco

8.C I T Y A T T O R N E Y

9.O R A L C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
T his i s a t im e for an y ci ti zen t o com m ent on an y it em li st ed or n ot li st ed on th e ag end a. A nyon e wi sh in g to ad d res s the leg islat ive b od y i s req u es ted t o su b m it a sp eaker card t o th e C i ty C lerk at or p rior to s p eaki n g . T h e sp eakers are req u ested t o keep th eir com m en ts to no m ore t h an three (3) m in u t es. S p eakers will b e g iven fi ve (5 ) m inu tes d u ri n g p ub lic h eari ng s. T h e use of visu al ai d s will b e i n c lu d ed in th e t im e li m i t. P ub li c com m ents an d q u est ion s for t h e p urp ose of h earing curren t m at ters of con cern in ou r com m u n i ty an d to p rovid e c it izen s a m eth od for th e p ub li c to h ear th ose con cerns in an op en ven u e is encourag ed .

H owever, u n d er t he p rovisions of t he B rown A ct , th e C ity C ou n c il is p rohib ited from d iscu ssion of it em s n ot listed on t he ag end a, and th erefore, th e C ity C oun cil, C ity M an ag er, or C it y A tt orn ey w il l t ake com m u n i cat ion s un d er ad visem en t for consid eration an d ap p rop riate resp on s e or d i sc u s si on at a later

tim e.

10.C O N S E N T C A L E N D A R
A ll m at ters list ed u n d er th e C onsent C al en d ar are c on s id ered t o b e rou ti ne and will b e en act ed b y on e roll call vot e. T h ere w i ll b e no sep arat e d is cu ss ion of these i tem s u n l ess m em b ers of t h e l eg i sl ati ve b od y req uest sp ecific item s b e rem oved from th e C on sen t C alen d ar for sep arate action.

A .A P P R O V A L O F M I N U T E S
A p p rove t he Reg u lar M eet in g M i n u tes of O c tob er 2 4, 20 22 . (S taff Person :

Keri J oh nson)
B.2 N D R E A D I N G O F O R D I N A N C E 19 71 A P P R O V I N G S P E C I F I C P L A N A M E N D M E N T N O. 22 -00 01 , A M E N D I N G T H E H I S TO R I C D O W N TO W N

U P L A N D S P E C I F I C P L A N
H old sec on d read i n g b y n u m b er an d ti tl e on ly, w aive furth er read in g , and ad op t O rd inan ce N o. 1 97 1 ad op t in g S p ec ifi c P lan A m en d m en t N o. 21 - 00 02 , am en d i n g t h e H istoric D own town U p land S p eci fic P lan t o p roh ib it storag e u s es an d i n t ern et-on ly b u si n es ses t h at are n ot op en t o the p u b lic and allow for an d ad op t reg ulations p ertaining to ou td oor d isp lay of m erch and ise for retail b usin esses. (S taff Person : Rob ert D alq u est) C .A P P R O V E A M E N D M E N T TO T H E A G R E E M E N T W I T H K E E N A N A N D

A S S O C I A T E S F O R B E N E F I T S B R O K E R S E R V I C E S A p p rove A m en d m ent N o. 2 to th e ag reem ent with Keen an and A ssociates for B en efit B roker S ervices, extend in g th e term s of the ag reem en t th rou g h D ecem b er 31 , 2 02 3; an d authorize th e C ity M an ag er to execu te th e am en d m ent. (S taff Person: S tep hen Parker)
D.A P P R O V E T H E E S TA B L I S H M E N T O F PA I D I N T E R N S H I P J O B

S P E C I F I C A T I O N S
A p p rove t he estab lish m en t of a p aid in ternship job sp ecification s. (S taff Person: S tep hen Parker)
E .A P P R O V E A N A M E N D M E N T TO A N A G R E E M E N T W I T H R O B E RT H A L F

I N T E R N A T I O N A L F O R T E M P O R A RY A C C O U N T I N G A N D

A D M I N I S T R A T I V E S E R V I C E S
A p p rove A m en d m en t N o. 1 to t h e p rofession al s ervi ces ag reem ent with Rob ert H alf I n t ern ati on al to p rovid e the C i ty wi th st aff aug m en tation services; authorize t he C i ty M an ag er t o exec u t e t h e am en d m en t ; and ap p rove a b ud g et ad ju stm en t of $14 0,0 00 . (S taff Person: S tep hen Parker)
F.T E R M I N A T I O N O F T H E J A N U A R Y 20 22 W I N D S TO R M LO C A L

E M E R G E N C Y
A d op t a Resolution term in ating the existen ce of a local em erg en cy cau sed b y th e extrem e w in d s torm t hat c om m en c ed on J an u ary 2 1, 2 0 2 2 . (S taff Person: S tep hen Parker)
G .A P P R O V E P U R C H A S E O F S P I D R T E C H P L A T F O R M S O F T W A R E A p p rove t he p u rc h as e of t he S P I D R T E C H P lat form s oftware; and authorize t he u se of F Y 1 6-1 7 C O P S G rant fu n d s for t h e p urch ase. (S taff Person: M arcelo B lan co)
H .A P P R O V E T H E P U R C H A S E O F 4 0 M M L E S S L E T H A L M U N I T I O N

L A U N C H E R S, A M M U N I T I O N , A N D T R A I N I N G R O U N D S A p p rove t he p u rc h as e of fi fteen 40 m m Les s Lethal M u n it ion L aun ch ers, 20 0 roun d s, train in g roun d s, and 15 hard cases; and authorize th e use of

F Y 17 /18 C op s G rant fu n d s for t he p u rchase. (S taff Person: M arcelo B lanco)
I .L I E N S A L E S E R V I C E A G R E E M E N T E X T E N S I O N D irect th e C it y M an ag er to exerc is e t h e op t ion for a second on e year exten sion to th e ag reem ent with D en co L ien S ervices, I nc. for services related to th e sal e of veh ic les im p oun d ed /stored at th e Poli ce D ep artm ent im p ou nd l ot, extend in g th e ag reem en t th rou g h O ctob er 3 1, 2 02 3. (S taff Person: M arcelo B lan co)
J.A W A R D O F B I D F O R P R O J E C T N O. 70 00 3 & 7 00 09 , C I T Y W I D E S T R I P I N G R E P L A C E M E N T (B I D N O. 2 02 2-0 5) A p p rove t he sp eci fic ati ons for C itywid e S t rip ing P roject N o. 7 00 03 and 70 00 9; aw ard the con stru ction contract to I n terstate S trip ing , I nc. in th e am ou nt of $1 75 ,72 1.2 5; an d au th ori ze a c on s tru c ti on c on t in g en cy i n th e am ou nt of $2 6 ,2 7 8 .7 5 , for a t otal am ou n t of $20 2,0 00 . from t he G as Tax F u nd . (S taff Person: B rad en Yu )
K .F I N A L D R A F T O F T H E LO C A L R O A D S A F E T Y P L A N A p p rove, rec eive, and file t h e L ocal Road S afety P lan (L R S P ). (S taff Person: B rad en Yu )
L.A C C E P TA N C E O F P U B L I C I M P R O V E M E N T S F O R T R A C T 1 87 07 ,

LO C A T E D O N T H E N O R T H E A S T C O R N E R O F B A S E L I N E R O A D A N D

PA R K V I E W P R O M E N A D E
A ccep t th e p u b li c im p rovem ents con st ru ct ed b y Taylor-M orrison , l ocat ed on th e n ort heast corn er of Parkview P rom i n ad e and B asel in e Road ; and ap p rove the release of th e S u b d ivision Perform ance B on d s and L ab or and M aterial B ond s. (S taff Person ; B rad en Yu)
M .20 22 M I L L S A C T C O N T R A C T S F O R F I V E (5) H I S TO R I C P R O P E RT I E S A p p rove th e M ills A ct con tracts for five (5 ) historic p rop erties and authorize th e C ity M anag er to execu te th e d ocu m en ts . (S t aff Person : Rob ert D alq uest)
N .C O N S I D E R A T I O N O F A L E A S E A G R E E M E N T W I T H T E S L A M OTO R S C A N A D A F O R A 35 ,00 0 S Q U A R E F O OT A R E A W I T H I N A C I T Y-O W N E D R E S E R V O I R S I T E LO C A T E D O N T H E N O R T H W E S T C O R N E R O F 1 5 T H S T R E E T A N D 6 T H A V E N U E (A P N : 10 45 -08 1-4 0 & 5 5); A N D

D E T E R M I N I N G T H A T T H E L E A S E A G R E E M E N T I S E X E M P T F R O M T H E

C A L I F O R N I A E N V I R O N M E N TA L Q U A L I T Y A C T (C E Q A ) A p p rove a Lease A g reem en t b etween t h e C ity of U p land an d Tesla C orp oration C an ad a for a 3 5,0 00 sq u are foot area w ithin a city-ow ned reservoir site th at is 4 .31 ac res in size locat ed on th e n ort h w es t corn er of 15 th S treet an d 6 th A ven u e (A P N : 10 45 -08 1-0 4 & 5 5); au th orize the C ity M an ag er to execu te t h e ag reem en t; d eterm i ne th at t he lease ag reem en t is exem p t from th e C ali forn ia E n vironm ent al Q u al it y A ct (C E Q A ) p u rsuan t to G uid elin es S ec ti on 1 50 61 (B )(3 ) an d 1 53 11 ; an d d irect s taff t o fi le a N otice of E xem p tion p ursu ant to the C alifornia E n vironm ental Q uality A ct. (S taff Person: Rob ert D alq uest)

11.P U B L I C H E A R I N G S
A .C O N S I D E R A T I O N O F G E N E R A L P L A N A M E N D M E N T N O. 2 1-0 00 1 A N D Z O N E C H A N G E N O. 21 -00 01 TO A M E N D T H E G E N E R A L P L A N L A N D U S E D E S I G N A T I O N A N D T H E Z O N I N G D I S T R I C T O F A P N : 1 04 7-0 72 -22 (37 1 S . 2 N D A V E N U E ), A P N : 1 04 7-0 72 -23 (38 1 S . 2 N D A V E N U E ), A P N :
10 47 -07 2-0 4 (3 78 S. 1 S T A V E N U E ) A N D A P N : 1 04 7-0 72 -05 (3 70 S . 1 st A V E N U E ); A N D D E T E R M I N E T H E P R O J E C T I S E X E M P T F R O M T H E

C A L I F O R N I A E N V I R O N M E N TA L Q U A L I T Y A C T (C E Q A )

Th e C i ty C ou n c il w i ll c on d u c t a p u b li c hearin g to con sid er G en eral P lan A m end m en t N o. 21 -00 01 an d Zon e C han g e N o. 21 -00 01 . (S taff Person :

Rob ert D alq u est)
Recom m end ation:1 )S taff P resen tation
2 )H old P u b lic H earing
3 )C lose P ub lic H earin g

4 )A d op t a Resolution ap p rovin g G eneral P lan
A m end m en t N o. G PA-21 -00 01 t o am en d th e G eneral P lan l an d u se d es ig n at ion of four (4 ) existin g lots from O ffic e/P rofess ion al (O P ) t o S in g le-Fam ily M ed iu m (S F R-M ). Th e p roject s it e in cl ud es the follow in g p arcels A P N : 1 04 7-0 72 -22 (37 1 S. 2n d Avenu e), A P N : 10 47 -07 2-2 3 (3 81 S. 2n d Aven ue), 10 47 -07 2-0 4 (37 8 S. 1 st Aven u e) an d A P N : 1 04 7- 07 2-0 5 (3 70 S. 1st Aven ue)

5 )D eterm ine th at t he p roject is exem p t from the C alifornia E n vironm ent al Q u al it y A ct
(C E Q A ) (C aliforn ia P ub lic Resources C od e S ection 21 00 0, et s eq .), p u rs u an t to S t ate C E Q A Reg ulation §1 50 61 (b )(3 )

6 )H old fi rs t read ing b y title on ly, waive fu rt her read in g , and i n t rod u c e an O rd i nan ce ad op t in g Zon in g C han g e N o. Z C-2 1-0 00 1 to am en d th e Zon in g C od e
D esig n ation of fou r (4 ) exi st in g lots from O ffice P rofession al (O P ) t o Resid ent ial S in g le-Fam ily M ed iu m R S -7 .5 A P N : 10 47 -07 2-2 2 (37 1 S. 2n d Avenu e), A P N : 10 47 -07 2-2 3 (3 81 S. 2n d Aven ue), A P N : 1 04 7-0 72 -04 (37 8 S. 1s t Aven ue), an d A P N :
10 47 -07 2-0 5 (3 70 S. 1st Aven ue)
B.C O N S I D E R A T I O N O F A D I S P O S I T I O N A N D D E V E LO P M E N T

A G R E E M E N T A N D R E G U L A TO RY A G R E E M E N T F O R T H E S A L E O F C E RTA I N C I T Y O W N E D R E A L P R O P E RT Y (A P N S : 10 46 -59 1-0 8, 0 9, 10 , 11 , 1 2, 1 3 ) LO C A T E D A T T H E N O R T H W E S T C O R N E R O F A S T R E E T A N D

F I R S T A V E N U E TO C I T Y V E N T U R E S H O M E B U I L D I N G L LC , A N D

F I N D I N G T H E S A M E C A T E G O R I C A L LY E X E M P T F R O M C A L I F O R N I A

E N V I R O N M E N TA L Q U A L I T Y A C T (C E Q A ) R E V I E W Th e C it y C oun ci l w il l con d u ct a p ub lic hearin g to con si d er a D is p os it ion and D evelop m en t A g reem ent an d Reg u lat ory A g reem ent for t h e sal e of C ity ow ned s urp l us lan d to C ity Ven tu res H om eb uild in g , L LC . (S taff Person :

Rob ert D alq u est)
Recom m end ation:1 )S taff P resen tation
2 )H old P u b lic H earing
3 )C lose P ub lic H earin g

4 )A d op t a Resolu ti on ap p roving of t he D isp osit ion an d D evelop m en t A g reem en t (“D D A ”) an d Reg u latory A g reem ent (“R A”) for the s ale of C ity own ed su rp lu s lan d to C i ty Ven tu res H om eb u il d i n g , L LC ., for a p rop osed resid ential p roject of 2 9 town hou se hom es, w ith at leas t 15 % of th ose hom es rest ri ct ed for lower-in com e first -ti m e hom eb u yers , sub sid ized in p art b y C i ty’s C al H O M E an d /or h ousin g set asid e fun d s.
5 )F ind t h e sam e categ orically exem p t from C aliforn ia E nviron m en tal Q uality A ct (C E Q A ) Review p u rsuan t

to G u id elines S ec ti ons 15 31 2, 15 20 6(b )(4),
15 06 0(c)(2) an d 1 53 78 (b ).

12.C O U N C I L C O M M I T T E E R E P O R T S

13.B U S I N E S S I T E M S

14.C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T I O N S

15.C I T Y M A N A G E R

16.A D J O U R N M E N T
T he next reg u larly sched uled C ity C ou ncil m eeting is M on d ay, N ovem b er 28 , 2 02 2
N O T E : I f yo u cha l l e ng e t h e p u b l i c h e a ri ng (s ) o r t he re l a t e d e nvi ro nm e n t a l d e t e rm i na t i o ns i n co u rt , yo u m a y b e l i m i t e d t o ra i s i n g o nl y t h o s e i s s ue s yo u o r s o m e o n e e l s e ra i s e d a t t h e p ub l i c h e a ri ng d e s cri b e d i n t h i s no t i ce , o r i n w ri t t e n co rre s p o nd e nce d e l i ve re d t o t he C i t y o f U p l a nd , a t , o r p ri o r t o , t he p ub l i c he a ri n g .

A l l A g e n d a i t e m s a n d b a ck-u p m a t e ri a l s a re a va i l a b l e f o r p u b l i c re vi e w a t t h e U p l a nd P ub l i c L i b ra ry, d o w n s t a i rs re f e re n ce d e s k a t 4 5 0 N o rt h E ucl i d A ve nue , t h e C i t y C l e rk's O f f i ce a t 460 N o rt h E ucl i d A ve nue a nd t h e C i t y w e b s i t e a t w w w.u p l a nd ca .g o v.

I n co m p l i a n ce w i t h t h e A m e ri ca n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s A ct , i f yo u n e e d s p e ci a l a s s i s t a nce t o p a rt i ci p a t e i n t hi s m e e t i n g , p l e a s e co n t a ct t h e C i t y C l e rk's O f f i ce , 931-4 1 2 0 . N o t i f i ca t i o n 48 h o u rs p ri o r t o t h e m e e t i n g w i l l e n a b l e t he C i t y t o m a ke re a s o n a b l e a rra n g e m e n t s t o e n s ure a cce s s i b i l i t y t o t h i s me e t i ng . [2 8 C F R 3 5 .1 0 2 -35.104 A D A T i t l e I I ] P O S T I N G S T A T E M E N T : O n N o ve m b e r 9 , 2 0 2 2 a t rue a nd co rre ct co p y o f t h i s a g e n d a w a s p o s t e d o n t he b ul l e t i n b o a rd s a t 450 N . E ucl i d A ve nue (U p l a n d P ub l i c L i b ra ry) a n d 4 6 0 N . E u cl i d Ave n u e (U p l a nd C i t y H a l l ) a n d t he C i t y w e b s i t e a t w w w.up l a n d ca .g o v.

ORDINANCE NO. 1971

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. SP-
22-0001, AMENDING THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN UPLAND

SPECIFIC PLAN TO PROHIBIT STORAGE USES AND INTERNET-

ONLY BUSINESSES THAT ARE NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AND

TO ADOPT REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO OUTDOOR DISPLAY

OF MERCHANDISE FOR RETAIL BUSINESSES
WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Division has initiated proceedings t o modify the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan; and

WHEREAS, for Specific Plan Amendments, Upland Municipal Code (UMC) Table 17.43- 1 identifies the decision-making authority as the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 22-0001 will not conflict with the goals, policies, and implementation measures set forth in the General Plan and Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Specific Plan Amendment application is for a text change only, no physical development is proposed; and

WHEREAS, the project is considered a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; and

WHEREAS, the specific plan amendment is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (California Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.), pursuant to State CEQA Regulation §15061(b)(3) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)), the common sense exemption covering activities with no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment; and

WHEREAS, on August 24, 2022 and September 28, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, made the necessary fi ndings, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 4974 recommending the City Council adopt an Amendment to the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan; and

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2022, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing introducing the first reading of the Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites for the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Ordinance: Specific Plan Amendment. The Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Ordinance No. 1971

Section 3. The proposal is in conformity with the following General Plan Land Use Policies.

1. Policy FA 8.2 Economic Development. Focus economic development efforts on the retention and attraction of viable and desirable commercial uses in Downtown.

Fact: The amendment will attract new retail uses that wish to have outdoor display within downtown Upland. Furthermore, the amendment will retain existing businesses and assist in their efforts to increase sales.

2. Policy ES-3.8 Ground-floor Retail. Attract retail uses to the ground floor level in Downtown in coordination with policies and standards in the Historic Downtown Upl and Specific.

Fact: The amendment will attract and retain viable retailers for ground floor level storefronts and will set up standards to ensure retailers have options for outdoor display of merchandise. In addition, uses in downtown will be further limited , which will result in additional opportunities and leasable space being available for retail or restaurant uses that can thrive in a downtown environment.

Section 4. The proposal is consistent with the following Specific Plan Objectives and Policies.

1. Objective 1.2 Ensure new development maintains the pedestrian scale and historic grid pattern of Downtown and contributes to a pedestrian-friendly walking environment.

Fact: The outdoor display of merchandise will be located adjacent to pedestrian walkways, maintaining the pedestrian scale and orienting retail towards pedestrians.

Furthermore, the prohibition of storage and internet-only businesses will ensure pedestrian oriented uses are established in the Old Town District at the pedestrian level.

2. Policy 3.2.3 Ground floor uses along 2nd Avenue, between C and 8th Streets, and along 9th Street, between 1st and 3rd Avenues, shall be commercially-oriented only and create a continuous building frontage along the street edge.

Fact: This amendment will prohibit uses within the Old Town District that are not friendly to pedestrians, ensuring that commercial buildings within the Old Town District are reserved for pedestrian oriented uses, where appropriate, such as retail and restaurant uses.

Section 5. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (California Pu blic Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.), pursuant to State CEQA Regulation §15061(b)(3) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)), the common sense exemption covering activities with no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment.

Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this

Ordinance No. 1971

Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that is would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subse ctions, subdivisions, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from its adoption.

Section 8. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Upland, pursuant to all legal requirements.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
Bill Velto, Mayor

I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland held on the 24th day of October, 2022, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland held on the 14th day of November, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: ______________________________
Keri Johnson, City Clerk

EXHIBIT A
Amendments to the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan

1 Euclid District 5-11
2 Old Town District 5-16
3 Arrow Highway District 5-21
4 Civic Center District 5-24
5 Pleasant View District 5-26
6 Multi-Family/Senior District 5-29
7 Citrus Transportation District 5-32
8 Residential Transit District 5-35
9 Olivedale District 5-39
A. Project-Specific Development Standards 5-42
1 Historic Preservation and Adaptive Reuse 5-42
2 Multi-Family Residential 5-44
3 Mixed-Use 5-48
4 Live/Work 5-49
5 Senior Housing 5-50
6 Second Dwelling Units 5-51
B. General Development Standards 5-52
1 Frontage Types 5-52
2 Fences and Walls 5-54
3 Corner Cut-off 5-56
4 Parking 5-57
5 Open Space 5-65
6 Landscaping 5-65
7 Lighting 5-65
8 Nonconforming Uses, Structures and Signs 5-67
9 Outdoor Display of Merchandise 5-70
C. Signs 5-71
a Purpose 5-71
b Signage Types Permitted 5-71
c General Standards 5-71
d Sign Area 5-72
e Sign Height 5-72
f Historical Signs 5-72
g Wall Signs 5-73
h Plaque Signs 5-73
i Window Signs 5-73
j Projecting Signs 5-73
k Awning and Canopy Signs 5-74
l Under-Canopy Signs 5-74
m Hanging Signs 5-74
n Marquee Signs 5-74
o Monument Signs 5-75
p Restaurant Menu Signs 5-75
q Tenant Directory Signs 5-76
r A-Frame Signs 5-76
s Temporary Signs 5-77
t Temporary Community or Civic Signs 5-77
u Murals 5-77
D. Definitions 5-78
,

C. Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses

Permitted and conditionally permitted uses allowed in each district are provided in Table 5-1. In some cases there are specific requirements for ground-floor and upper- floor uses, which are also indicated in the table. “P” designates permitted land uses, “m” designates a use requiring a minor conditional use permit, and “M” designates a use that requires a major conditional use permit. All uses are defined in Section H, Definitions.

Land uses that are not listed or not labeled “P”, “m” or “M” are not permitted. The development application and review process for permitted and conditionally permitted land uses is provided in Chapter 9, Implementation, of this Specific Plan.

The following uses are expressly prohibited in all districts in Downtown Upland:

i. Ambulance service, excepting offices;
ii. Automotive sales, including brokerages;
iii. Automotive repair (minor and major);
iv. Lodges, fraternity or sorority houses or similar places of regular, long-term, or frequent high-occupancy lodging;
v. Drive-thru establishments;
vi. Outdoor Display of Merchandise;
vi. Outdoor rental or storage yards;
vii. Pawnshops;
viii. Indoor storage as a primary use (within the Old Town District); ix. Internet-based businesses that are not open to the public (within the Old Town District, ground floor, on 2nd Avenue from D street to A Street and 9th Street from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue); and x. Any other uses that, after evaluation by the Planning Commission, may have characteristics that are adverse to the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan.

Table 5-1 Permitted Land Uses
Land Uses Permitted Uses by District

Key to Permit
Requirements P =
Permitted Use
C = Conditional Use Permit Required
m = Minor Conditional Use Permit
Required
Eu
c
l
i
d
1 Ol
d
To
w
n
1 Hi
s
t
o
r
i
c
Co
r
e

Ar
r
o
w
Hi
g
h
w
a
y

Ci
v
i
c

Ce
n
t
e
r

Pl
e
a
s
a
n
t
Vi
e
w

Mu
l
t
i
-Fa
m
i
l
y
/

Se
n
i
o
r
Ho
u
s
i
n
g

Ci
t
r
u
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n

Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Tr
a
n
s
i
t

Ol
i
v
e
d
a
l
e

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Residential
Multi-family Residential P P P*2 P P P P P P P P P P P P Residential Care Facility P P P P
Second Dwelling Unit P P
Senior Housing P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Single-Family Residential P P P P P3 P3 P P Institutional
Cultural Use (Assembly) m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
Cultural Use (Non-Assembly) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Government Office P P P P P P P P P P P P
Park or Recreational Facility P P P P P P P P P P Public Facility P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
School C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Commercial
Adult Business Subject to Chapter 17.20122 of the Municipal Code Alcoholic Beverage Sales (Off-Site, 25% GFA devoted to sale of alcohol)

C C C C C C C C C C
Animal Sales & Services (boarding) P P P P P P Animal Sales & Services (non-boarding) P P P P P P P P P P

ATM P P P P P P P P P P P P
Bank or Financial Services P P P P P P P P P P
Bar or Night Club C C m m m m C C m m
Commercial Recreation/Entertainment (indoor) P P P P P P P P P P Commercial Recreation/Entertainment (outdoor) P P P P P P Convenience Store P P P P P P P P P P
Grocery Store P P P P P P P P P
Health/Fitness Facility P P P P P P P P P P P P
Instructional or Production Studio P P P P P P P P P P Live Entertainment/Dancing4 C C C C C C C C C C
Personal Services (excluding salon/barbershop) P P P P P P P P P P Restaurant (fast food, excluding drive-through) P P P P m m P P P P Restaurant (full service, sit-down, serving no alcohol) P P P P P P P P P P

Table 5-1 Permitted Land Uses (Continued)
Land Uses Permitted Uses by District

Key to Permit
Requirements P =
Permitted Use
C = Conditional Use Permit Required
m = Minor Conditional Use Permit
Required
Eu
c
l
i
d
1 Ol
d
To
w
n
1 Hi
s
t
o
r
i
c
Co
r
e

Ar
r
o
w
Hi
g
h
w
a
y

Ci
v
i
c

Ce
n
t
e
r

Pl
e
a
s
a
n
t
Vi
e
w

Mu
l
t
i
-Fa
m
i
l
y
/

Se
n
i
o
r

Ho
u
s
i
n
g

Ci
t
r
u
s

Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n

Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Tr
a
n
s
i
t

Ol
i
v
e
d
a
l
e

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Gr
o
u
n
d

Up
p
e
r

Commercial (Continued)
Restaurant (full service, sit-down, serving alcohol) m m m m m m m m m m Retail Store, General P P P P P P P P P P
Salon/Barbershop m m m m m m m m m m
Sidewalk Café5 P P P P
Specialty Food Store P P P P P P P P P P
Office/Professional
Business Support Services P P P P P P P P P P P
Medical or Dental Laboratory P P m P P P P C C
Medical or Dental Office P P P P P P P P P
Urgent Care Facility P P P P
Home Occupation6 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Professional Office P P P P P P P P P
Other
Accessory Uses (habitable) P P P P P P P P P P P P Accessory Uses (nonhabitable) P P P P P P P P P P P P Bed & Breakfast6 P P P P P P P
Day Care Center - Small C C C C C C C
Day Care Center - Large C C C C C
Hotel (limited stay) P P P P P P P P P
Motel (limited stay) P P
Light Industrial P P P
Live/Work7 P P P P P P P P P P
Mixed-Use8 P P P P P P P P P P
Outdoor Display of Merchandise9 P P
Parking-Surface P P P P P P P P P
Parking-Structured P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Wireless Communication Facilities10 P P P P P P P P P P P P 1Includes 1st Avenue Overlay
*21st Avenue Overlay only
3Single-Family Residential in the Residential Transit District is subject to the Multi-Family Residential standards in Section E.2. Detached Single-Family Residential shall comprise no more than 1/3 of total development in the Residential Transit District.
4Either as the sole use or in conjunction with a permitted or conditionally permitted use.
5Per Chapter 17.32144 of Municipal Code
6Per Chapter 17.27124 of Municipal Code
7Per Chapter 17.28154 of Municipal Code
8All habitable areas of the ground floor shall be devoted to and constructed to accommodate non-residential uses as permitted in Table 5-1. Residential uses shall be on upper floors only. 9Per development standards within HDUSP Section (5)(F)(9) Per Chapter 17.156 of Municipal Code
10Per Chapter 17.156 of Municipal Code

• Reestablished after damage or destruction of more than 50 percent of its value, as determined by the Building
Department.

No new sign shall be approved for a site, structure, building, or use that contains non- conforming signs unless such nonconforming signs are removed or modified to conform with the provisions of this chapter.

No building permit shall be issued for any structures, building expansions, or new building construction on a site which contains nonconforming signs, unless all signs on the site are brought into conformance with this chapter. This does not include interior altera- tions which do not substantially change the character or intensity of the site.

All nonconforming signs shall be removed at such time as the use of any site, building, or structure is changed. A change in business ownership shall not be deemed a change of use pursuant to this section.

9. Outdoor Display of Merchandise

a. Outdoor display of the following merchandise shall be allowed subject to the requirements in Subsection b of this section:
• Flowers and plants;
• Clothing and apparel;
• Handcrafted products and goods;
• Artwork and pottery;
• Antiques;
• Recreational equipment (e.g., bicycles, roller skates, skateboards, etc.); • Other merchandise that the Development Services Director finds to be similar in characte r, type, or nature to the merchandise listed above.

b. Outdoor display/sales areas shall comply with all of the following development standards;

i. Permit Required. All applicants shall submit for a permit on such form as the Development Services Director prescribes, which shall include the information herein below, in addition to all other information determined necessary by the Director. ii. The display area shall be located adjacent to the storefront of the building within which the business is located. The display area shall not extend past the business storefront. iii. Display area is limited to 1 (one) public facing storefront and shall not exceed 75% of the tenant’s storefront.
iv. Displayed merchandise shall not obstruct traffic sight areas; encroach upon landscaped areas, driveways, parking spaces, access ways, or pedestrian walkways; or otherwise create hazards for vehicle or pedestrian traffic. ADA accessibility shall be preserved at all times. v. Ingress/egress to/from the building shall be preserved at all times. vi. Items shall only be displayed while the business is open and operating. Displayed items shall not be stored outside of the building. All displayed items shall be stored inside the building when the business is closed.
vii. The display area shall be maintained in an orderly and neat condition at all times. viii. Businesses shall maintain a Certificate of Insurance for a minimum determined by the Development Services Director, indicating the City of Upland as a “Certificate Holder” and “Additional Insured.”

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.C .

D A T E :N ovem b er 1 4, 2 02 2
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : S T E P H E N PA R K E R , C PA , A S S I S TA N T C I T Y M A N A G E R

T E R R Y D OY L E , H U M A N R E S O U R C E S /R I S K M A N A G E R S U B J E C T :A P P R O V E A M E N D M E N T TO T H E A G R E E M E N T W I T H K E E N A N A N D

A S S O C I A T E S F O R B E N E F I T S B R O K E R S E R V I C E S

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m en d ed th at th e C i ty C ou nc il ap p rove A m en d m en t N o. 2 to t h e ag reem en t w ith Keenan and A ssociates for B en efit B roker S ervices, ext end in g th e term s of t he ag reem en t th rou g h D ecem b er 31 , 20 23 ; and authorize th e C ity M anag er to execu te the am end m en t.

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th e p rop osed action s up p orts th e C i ty's p olicy to b e fiscal ly resp ons ib le i n p rovi d i n g fair an d eq u itab le b en efits to its em p loyees.

B A C K G R O U N D
Th e C ity h as m aint ain ed an ag reem en t w it h Keen an & A s soc iat es, a T h i rd -Part y A d m inistrator (T PA ) for B en efit B roker S ervices sin ce 20 16 . T h e orig in al m ed ic al coverag e b roker ag reem en t was for the tim e p eriod of J an uary 1, 2 02 1 throug h D ecem b er 3 1, 2 02 1. T his ag reem en t in cl ud ed an op ti on for t h e C it y t o elec t to ext en d th e ag reem en t for tw o (2 ), one (1) year t erm s with a 5 % in crease for each op ti on year. T hi s is th e sec on d am en d m ent to th at ag reem ent.

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
Keenan an d A ssociates n eg otiates on b ehal f of t h e C ity, w i th b enefi t p rovid ers for health care b en efits p rovid ed to C ity em p loyees. Th ese services in clud e, b ut are n ot lim ited to, assistin g th e C it y in ad m i ni st eri ng all g rou p insurance p lan s; resp ond in g to q uestions from an d p rovid in g in form ati on t o st aff; res earc hi ng and ad vising th e C it y of any n ew d evelop m ents in

th e law and em p loyee b en efit p rog ram s on an on g oin g b asis; revi ew in g cl aim s exp erien ce, claim service an d claim ad m i ni st rat ion to ensure m axi m u m b en efi t to t he C it y; an d rep resentin g the C ity in all neg oti ati ons w it h p rovi d ers on all is su es i n c lu d i n g th ose relat ed to p rem ium s, b enefit levels, p lan d esig n , and sp ecial term s an d cond ition s.

Th e t erm of th e ren ew al is for J an u ary 1 , 20 23 th rou g h D ec em b er 3 1, 2 02 3. T he am end m en t calls for a 5 % in crease. T h e rate for 2 0 2 2 was $5 8,0 00 a year, an d t h e rate for 2 0 2 3 is $6 0,9 00 .

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
Th e fu nd in g for this ag reem en t h as b een i n c lu d ed in t he cu rren t op erating b ud g et . N o ad d ition al b ud g et ap p rop riation is n ecessary at this tim e.

A L T E R N A T I V E S
P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
Amendment No. 2
Amendment No. 1
Benefit Broker Agreement 2021

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

SERVICES BENEFIT BROKER

This Amendment No. 2 is made and effective as of January 1, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Upland, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Keenan & Associates (“Consultant”).

City and Consultant are sometimes referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as “Parties”.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into the Benefit Broker Agreement, dated January 1, 2021 (“Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the current term of the Agreement shall expire on December 31, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to continue their relationship subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree:

1. The Agreement is hereby renewed for an additional one (1) year term beginning on January 1, 2023 and ending on December 31, 2023 (“Renewal Term”).

a. City agrees to pay Keenan twelve monthly installments of five thousand and seventy- five dollars ($5,075.00) commencing January 1, 2023, for services rendered under this Agreement with a not to exceed amount of sixty thousand and nine hundred dollars ($60,900). Rather than have an ever-changing contracted commission amount based on fluctuating Kaiser premiums, this dollar amount will be fixed for the length of the contract and employee premium rates will be net of commissions.

2. All the remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect and shall govern the conduct of the Parties during the Renewal Term.

3. Each person signing this Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement on behalf of a Party represents and warrants that he or she has the necessary authority to bind such Party and that this Amendment is binding on and enforceable against such Party.

4. A manually signed copy of this Amendment No. 2 which is transmitted by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Amendment No. 2 for all purposes.

5. This Amendment No. 2 may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

[SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR

PROFESSIONAL CONSUTANT SERVICES BENEFIT BROKER

WITH KEENAN & ASSOCATIES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have approved this First Amended Agreement effective the day and year first above written.

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City of Upland Keenan and Associates
460 N. Euclid Ave. 2355 Crenshaw Blvd., Suite 200
Upland CA 91785 Torrance CA 90501
By: By:

Michael Blay Laurie LoFranco,
City Manager Senior Vice President
ATTEST:

By:

Keri Johnson
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Stephen Deitsch
City Attorney
10/13/2022

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.D .

D A T E :N ovem b er 1 4, 2 02 2
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : S T E P H E N PA R K E R , C PA , A S S I S TA N T C I T Y M A N A G E R

T E R R Y D OY L E , H U M A N R E S O U R C E S /R I S K M A N A G E R S U B J E C T :A P P R O V E T H E E S TA B L I S H M E N T O F PA I D I N T E R N S H I P J O B

S P E C I F I C A T I O N S

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m end ed that th e C ity C oun cil ap p rove th e estab lishm ent of a p aid intern sh ip job sp ecifications.

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th e p rop os ed action su p p ort s th e C i ty's g oal to effectively rec ru it q ualified ap p l ic ant s w ho have an in terest in p u b lic service and p rovid e fair com p en sation for the d uties p erform ed .

B A C K G R O U N D
I n ternship p rog ram s h ave p roven t o b e an effect ive p at hway for col leg e s tu d en ts w an ti n g to start a c areer i n loc al g overnm ent an d to g ain w ork exp eri en c e wh il e learn in g ab ou t d ifferen t C ity d ep artm ents an d their service to th e com m u nity.

Th e b en efits of an in ternship p rog ram for t he C it y of U p lan d inclu d e: intern s g ain real-w ork exp erien ce and d evelop val uab le ski ll s rel ated t o t h e w orkp lac e b efore g rad u ati on ; increases th e n um b er of p rojec ts a d ep artm ent c an com p let e, as it p rovi d es ad d ition al w orkers; assists in terns i n b uild in g confid en ce w orki n g in a p rofes si on al environ m en t; an d is a g reat w ay for cu rrent C ity em p loyees to m en tor and coach the n ext g eneration of p ub lic servan ts.

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
D ue t o t he C O V I D -1 9 p an d em ic, th e C it y h as seen a ris e i n res ig nat ion s and retirem ents.

F rom th e p eriod of J u ly 1 , 20 21 th rou g h J u n e 3 0, 2 02 2 t h e C it y lost ap p roxim ately 22 % of its w orkforce throug h resig n ation or retirem en t.

I n an effort to com b at t hese recruitm ent is su es, th e H u m an Resou rces/R isk M anag em en t D ivision is lookin g at reestab lish in g th e p aid i n t ern p rog ram , w h ic h can as si st t h e C i ty in p rovid in g career p at hway op p ortu nities for a w id er ap p l ic an t p ool . T h e p rog ram w as estab lished an d a salary ran g e w as d eterm ined , b ut a job sp ecificat ion was n ot d evelop ed .

Th e C i ty i s recom m end in g t he at tac h ed job sp ecification b e u sed so t h e C ity m ay op en u p recru itm en t for th is p reviou sly-estab lished p rog ram .

Th ese p ositions w ou l d b e for p art-t im e em p loyees wh o h ave an i n t eres t in a p articular d ep artm en t, such as d evel op m en t services or p ub li c works, and are c ons id eri ng p u b l ic service as a career p ath . T h e req u irem en ts to b e p art of t h e i nt ern sh ip p rog ram w ou l d b e th at the ap p lican t is c urren tl y en roll ed in an ac cred i ted col leg e or un iversity an d s u c ces sfu l com p letion of th e C ity's b ackg rou nd in vestig ation.

Th e recom m en d ed s alary ran g e for all in terns i s Ran g e 44 P T ($15 .10 -$1 8.2 5). Th is i s a p art- tim e p osition an d is n ot assig n ed to any of the b arg ain in g u nits.

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
Th e fi sc al im p act i s $15 ,14 8.3 2 - $1 8,3 08 .40 an d i s alread y b ud g et ed in p art-t im e salaries.

N o ad d ition al ap p rop riation s are necessary at th is tim e.

A L T E R N A T I V E S
P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
Administrative Intern J ob Specifications

September 2022
FLSA: Non-Exempt

ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN

DEFINITION

Under direct supervision, participates and receives training in a municipal government program by performing a variety of office support activities within an assigned department or program; areas of responsibility may include reception, word processing, data entry, record-keeping, filing, and various research activities; and performs related work as required.

SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED

Receives direct supervision from assigned supervisory and/or management personnel. Exercises no supervision over staff.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS

This is an entry level, part-time position classification assigned to various departments. Incumbents in this classification learn and assist in conducting assignments in support of a designated department or program.

Typically, Interns are undergraduate/graduate college students interested in pursuing a career in the public sector.

EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL JOB FUNCTIONS (Illustrative Only)
Management reserves the right to add, modify, change, or rescind the work assignments of different positions and to make reasonable accommodations so qualified employees can perform the essential functions of the job.

 Performs a variety of office administrative duties to support operations, including word processing, data entry, record-keeping, and filing.
 Maintains and updates accurate and detailed records, verifies accuracy of information, and researches and resolves discrepancies; retrieves information from computer systems and databases.  Screens calls, visitors, and incoming mail; assists public at front counter and directs public to appropriate locations and/or staff; responds to complaints and requests for information.  Types, formats, and proofreads a variety of routine reports, letters, documents, contracts, flyers, brochures, and memoranda; checks drafts for punctuation, spelling, and grammar; suggests corrections.  Compiles information and data for administrative and basic statistical reports; assembles reports, manuals, articles, announcements, and other informational materials.  Gathers, assembles, updates, and distributes a variety of department or City specific information, forms, records, and data.
 Performs other duties as assigned.

QUALIFICATIONS

Knowledge of:

 Operations and services of assigned department or program.  City-wide and departmental policies and procedures related to assigned areas of responsibility.  General office business, administrative, and clerical practices.  Methods and techniques of compiling information and data.  Methods and techniques of preparing routine office and business correspondence.

Administrative Intern

 Basic public agency administration.
 Business arithmetic.
 Principles and procedures of recordkeeping.
 City and mandated safety rules, regulations, and protocols.  Techniques for providing a high level of customer service by effectively dealing with the public, vendors, contractors, and City staff.
 The structure and content of the English language, including the meaning and spelling of words, rules of composition, and grammar.
 Modern equipment and communication tools used for business functions and program, project, and task coordination, including computers and software programs relevant to work performed.

Ability to:

 Respond to and effectively prioritize multiple phone calls and other requests for service.  Compose routine correspondence from brief instructions.  Receive, open, review, sort, date stamp, and distribute mail.  Prepare and type a variety of documents and forms such as correspondence, letters, and reports, using correct punctuation and grammar.
 Make accurate arithmetic computations.
 Organize, maintain, and update office database and records systems.  File materials alphabetically, chronologically, and numerically.  Enter and retrieve data from a computer with sufficient speed and accuracy to perform assigned work.  Establish and maintain a variety of filing, recordkeeping, and tracking systems.  Independently organize work, set priorities, meet critical deadlines, and follow-up on assignments.  Understand, interpret, and apply all pertinent laws, codes, regulations, policies and procedures, and standards relevant to work performed.
 Use tact, initiative, prudence, and independent judgment within general policy, procedural, and legal guidelines.
 Effectively use computer systems, software applications relevant to work performed, and modern business equipment to perform a variety of work tasks.
 Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing, using appropriate English grammar and syntax.
 Establish, maintain, and foster positive and effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work.

Education and Experience:

Any combination of training and experience that would provide the required knowledge, skills, and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the required qualifications would be:

Education:
 Equivalent to completion of the twelfth (12th) grade. Current enrollment in an accredited college or university is required.

Experience:
 Relevant volunteer or work experience in a related field is highly desirable.

Licenses and Certifications:

 None.

PHYSICAL DEMANDS

Administrative Intern

Must possess mobility to work in a standard office setting and use standard office equipment, including a computer; vision to read printed materials and a computer screen; and hearing and speech to communicate in person and over the telephone. This is primarily a sedentary office classification although standing in work areas and walking between work areas may be required. Finger dexterity is needed to access, enter, and retrieve data using a computer keyboard or calculator and to operate standard office eq uipment.

Positions in this classification occasionally bend, stoop, kneel, reach, push, and pull drawers open and closed to retrieve and file information. Employees must possess the ability to lift, carry, push, and pull materials and objects up to 10 pounds.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

Employees work in an office environment with moderate noise levels, controlled temperature conditions, and no direct exposure to hazardous physical substances. Employees may interact with upset staff and/or public and private representatives in interpreting and enforcing departmental policies and procedures .

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.E .

D A T E :N ovem b er 1 4, 2 02 2
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : S T E P H E N PA R K E R , A S S I S TA N T C I T Y M A N A G E R S U B J E C T :A P P R O V E A N A M E N D M E N T TO A N A G R E E M E N T W I T H R O B E RT

H A L F I N T E R N A T I O N A L F O R T E M P O R A R Y A C C O U N T I N G A N D

A D M I N I S T R A T I V E S E R V I C E S

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m end ed th at th e C ity C oun cil ap p rove A m end m en t N o. 1 to the p rofession al services ag reem en t wi th Rob ert H alf I n ternat ion al to p rovi d e th e C ity w it h st aff au g m entation services; au th ori ze th e C i ty M an ag er to execu te th e am en d m en t ; an d ap p rove a b u d g et ad ju stm en t of $14 0,0 00 .

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th e p rop osed ac ti on su p p orts t he C it y's g oal of m aintain in g ord erly an d tim ely fin an c ial an d ad m in istrative p rocesses.

B A C K G R O U N D
O n s everal occasion s i n th e las t five years, th e C i ty has ent ered into p rofess ion al services ag reem en ts with Rob ert H al f I n ternation al to fil l vari ou s C it y vacan cies and for as si st an c e w ith p rep aration for th e ann ual aud it.

I n S ep t em b er 2 02 2, t he C ity en tered i n t o a $4 5,0 00 one-year ag reem en t w it h Rob ert H alf I n ternation al to assist w ith filling vacancies in th e F in ance an d H um an Resou rces d ivision s un d er th e C ity M anag er's au th ority.

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
A s S t aff i s p u rsuing th e recru i tm en t of vacan t p osi ti on s , ad d itional services are need ed to m aintain ord erl y an d t im ely fi n an ci al and ad m in istrative p roces ses . C urren t vac an c ies of

A ccou ntant, Payroll Tec hn ic ian , and E xecu tive A ss is tan t I have m ad e it nec ess ary t o in crease th e scop e of the existin g ag reem ent w ith Rob ert H alf I ntern ational for ad m inistrative an d p rofession al tasks to b e com p leted tim ely un til p osition s are filled with p erm anen t staff. T his am en d m ent t o th e exi st in g ag reem ent p rovi d es for an increased b u d g et for t hes e services.

W hile th e C i ty h as exi st in g b ud g et for t hese services, th ey are c urren tl y record ed in p ersonn el exp en se, an d con tract u al s ervi ces are b ud g et ed in m ain ten ance an d op erat ion s. A s su ch , a b u d g et am en d m ent i s b ein g req u es ted to reclassify $14 0,0 00 of p ersonn el b u d g et from vacan cies in t he aforem en tioned p osit ion s t o con tract u al servic es ac cou n t s t o acc ou n t for the in crease in the Rob ert H alf I ntern ational ag reem en t cost.

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
Th e n et effec t of t hi s req uest is zero. A b u d g et ad ju s tm en t (at tac hed ) t otalin g $1 40 ,00 0 w ill red uce salaries (Person n el cos t categ ory) in vari ou s d ep art m en ts an d i n c reas e contractu al services (O p erat ion an d M aint enan ce cost c ateg ory) b y th e sam e am ou n t in each ap p licab le fun d .

A L T E R N A T I V E S
P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
Amendment No. 1
Robert Half International P rofessional Services Agreement

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

WITH ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL

This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services dated July 7, 2022 (the “Master Agreement”) is made and entered into as of November 14, 2022 (“Effective Date”) by and between the City of Upland, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Robert Half International, a corporation, by and through its administrative & customer service and finance & accounting contract talent practice groups with its location at 3633 Inland Empire Blvd, Suite 955, Ontario, CA 91764 -4922 (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have entered into the Master Agreement, for the purpose of providing staff augmentation services; and B. WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement to include additional funds for the continued performance of services in accordance with the compensation provisions of the Master Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and th e mutual covenants, conditions, and promises contained in this Amendment No. 1 and the Master Agreement, the Parties mutually agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

2. Compensation. Section 2, Compensation, Subsection (b) of the Master Agreement is amended to replace the not to exceed amount with the sum of one hundred eighty-five thousand dollars ($185,000).

3. Full Force. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Master Agreement, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this Amendment No. 1.

4. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

WITH ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 on the Effective Date first herein above written.

CITY OF UPLAND
APPROVED BY:

Michael Blay
City Manager

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson
City Clerk

Approved as to form:

Stephen P. Deitsch
City Attorney

CONSULTANT

ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL

Signature

Name

Title

(Two Signatures of Corporate Officers
Required for Corporations)

Signature

Name

Title

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.F .

D A T E :N ovem b er 1 4, 2 02 2
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : S T E P H E N PA R K E R , A S S I S TA N T C I T Y M A N A G E R S U B J E C T :T E R M I N A T I O N O F T H E J A N U A RY 2 02 2 W I N D S TO R M LO C A L

E M E R G E N C Y

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m end ed t hat th e C i ty C oun ci l ad op t a Resol u t ion term i n at in g t h e exi st en c e of a local em erg ency cau sed b y the extrem e w in d storm that com m en ced on J anu ary 2 1, 2 02 2.

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th e p rop osed action su p p orts th e C ity's g oal to p rotect th e p ub lic ord er and the health , safety, and g en eral w elfare of th e com m u nity.

B A C K G R O U N D
O n J an u ary 2 1 , 20 22 , th e C i ty of U p l an d exp erien ced an ext rem e w in d storm with hu rricane- force w in d s exceed in g 8 0 m il es p er hou r. T he s torm c au s ed d own ed t rees and st reet lig hts, w id esp read p ower outag es and severe d am ag e to trees, h om es, b u sinesses, vehicles, sid ewalks, an d road ways.

I n th e interest of p u b lic h eal th an d s afety and as th e extrem e w in d event exceed ed th e C ity’s p erson nel and fin anc ial res ou rces , on J an uary 26 , 20 22 , th e C ity M an ag er, act in g i n his cap acity as D i rec tor of E m erg en c y S ervic es, t ook step s t o p rocl aim th e exi st en c e of a local em erg en cy b y si g n in g a P roclam ation d eclarin g t he exi st en c e of a local em erg en cy c au s ed b y an extrem e w in d storm .

I n a s p ec ial m eeti n g on J an u ary 31 , 2 02 2, C i ty C ou ncil ad op t ed Resolut ion N o. 66 36 ratifyin g th e D irector of E m erg ency S ervices’ p roclam ation d eclarin g a local em erg en cy.

Th e C it y su b m itted a req u est for fin ancial as si st an c e rel ati ng to th e local em erg en cy caused b y th e extrem e wind st orm to th e C al iforn i a O ffice of E m erg en cy S ervic es (C al O E S ) on J an uary 31 , 20 22 .

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
Th e resp on se to th e d am ag e caused b y th e J an uary 20 22 w in d storm was swift an d encom p assin g . Th e S an B ernard ino C ou nty F ire D ep artm en t w orked tog ether with P ub lic Works, t h e C i ty of U p l and Police D ep artm en t, Up lan d C E RT, C al O E S F ire and B rig htview L and scap e S ervices, I n c to org an ize t he res p on se. F u rther assist ance was p rovi d ed b y S ou th ern C ali forn ia E d ison, volun teer org an izati on Team Ru b icon , an d W est C oast A rb orist in th e clearin g of d am ag ed t rees . I n tan d em , m em b ers of t he p u b l ic assisted with c learin g tree d eb ris from local p arks.

At th is tim e, the situ ation resulting from th e wind storm is d eem ed to b e w ithin th e control of th e n orm al p rot ect ive services, p erson nel, eq u ip m en t, an d facil it ies of and w it h i n th e C it y of Up lan d , an d the local em erg en cy can b e term inated .

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
Th e C it y w as recen tl y n ot ifi ed b y C al O E S t hat our req uest for fin ancial assistan ce p ertain in g to t he J an u ary 20 22 extrem e wi n d st orm even t was d en i ed . C ost s p ert ain in g t o th e event w ere p rim arily b orn e b y the G en eral F u nd and in clud ed in the p rior fiscal year.

Th e fiscal im p act of the extrem e w in d storm is curren tly calcu lated to b e $75 3,0 00 , w ith d eb ris clean-u p ($2 8 0 ,0 0 0 ), d am ag ed con crete rep lac em en t ($1 67 ,00 0) and rep airs to C ity-ow ned b u ild ing s ($12 1,0 00 ) com p ris in g th e p rim ary c ost s. I n ad d it ion , the C it y est im ates $12 7,5 00 in future exp en ses for rep lacing d own ed street trees.

A L T E R N A T I V E S
P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
Resolution Terminating Local Emergency
Windstorm L ocal E mergency P roclamation and Ratification

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND,

CALIFORNIA TERMINATING THE EXISTENCE OF THE LOCAL

EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE EXTREME WINDSTORM THAT
COMMENCED ON JANUARY 21, 2022

WHEREAS, a local emergency existed in the City of Upland in accordance with Resolution No. 6636 adopted by the City Council on the 21st day of January, 2022 as a result of an extreme windstorm with hurricane-force winds exceeding 80 miles per hour causing downed trees and street lights, widespread power outages and severe damage to trees, homes, businesses, vehicles, street lights, and roadways; and

WHEREAS, thanks to the immediate and ongoing efforts of the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Upland Public Works, the Upland Police Department, Upland CERT, Cal OES Fire, Southern California Edison, Team Rubicon, and many more County and partner agencies, the situation resulting from said windstorm is now deemed to be within the control of the normal protective services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of and within said City of Upland.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Upland hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:

Section 1. The above findings are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council does hereby proclaim the termination of said local emergency.

Section 3. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 2022.

Bill Velto, Mayor

I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 14th day of November, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.G .

D A T E :N ovem b er 14 , 20 22
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : M A R C E LO A . B L A N C O, P O L I C E C H I E F

C L I F F M A T H E W S, P O L I C E C A P TA I N

LO N T E A G U E , P O L I C E L I E U T E N A N T
S U B J E C T :A P P R O V E P U R C H A S E O F S P I D R T E C H P L A T F O R M S O F T W A R E

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m end ed t hat th e C i ty C ou ncil ap p rove t he p urch ase of t h e S P I D R T E C H P latform softw are; an d au th orize the u se of F Y 1 6-1 7 C O P S G ran t fu nd s for th e p u rchase.

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th e p rop osed ac ti on sup p orts t he C i ty's g oal of p rovid in g effic ien t p ol ic e services to the citizen s of U p land .

B A C K G R O U N D
Th e city’s p op ul ati on h as c on t in u ed to in crease wh ile p at rol st affin g l evels h ave d ecreased .

Th is has cau sed in creased w ait tim es for calls for service. C itizen s wh o call the p olice an d exp erien ce exten d ed w ait ti m es g en eral ly call b ack rep eated ly w an t in g an up d at e. Th ese calls create an ad d itional b ackl og i n D isp atch, w h i ch un necessarily ti es u p th e d i sp atchers an d keep s th em from an swerin g p riority calls.

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
S taff eval uat ed curren tly avai lab le software t o analyze how to u se tech nolog y to im p rove efficien cy. S taff d eterm i n ed that S P I D R Tec h is th e on l y com p any t o p rovid e a servi ce t h at is d ed icated t o c us tom er servic e as it relat es to keep i n g c it iz en s up d ated on th eir c all for service.

Th e S P I D R Tech P latform is d esig n ed to w ork w ith our existin g Record s M anag em en t System and /or C om p u t er A id ed D is p at ch syst em t o au tom atically g en erate and sen d cu st om i zed text and em ai l m es sag es to victim s of c ri m e and rep orting p arti es. S u b s eq u ent ly, cu st om ers w ill receive m ob i le friend ly s u rveys com p rised of q u est ion s c h os en b y t h e U p lan d Police D ep artm ent th at can b e utilized to m easure com m u nity tru st and satisfaction .

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
Th ere i s no i m p act to th e curren t years' G en eral F u nd . T he p u rchase of the S P I D R Tech P latform for one year w ould b e from F Y 16 -17 C O P S G ran t fu n d in g . Th e i n i ti al p u rc h as e of the softw are, in cl u d in g i m p lem ent ati on an d train in g an d the first year of m ai n t en an ce, will b e $2 1,8 05 . I f su cc ess ful and con tinu ed , fu t u re cos ts w il l b e in clud ed in su b s eq u ent fiscal years' op erating b u d g ets.

A L T E R N A T I V E S
P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
Spidr Tech Agreement
Sole S ource

Upland Police Department
SPIDR Tech Agreement
Created: 08.10.2022

Modified: 10.12.2022

Expires: 10.31.2022

Prepared for:

Chief Marcelo Blanco

Prepared by:

Elon Kaiserman, Co-Founder, SPIDR Tech

Executive Summary
SPIDR Tech was founded by former law enforcement officers to help law enforcement agencies leverage their own data to improve public perception and increase efficiency by providing excellent customer service. Following extensive market research, we designed and built the world’s first comprehensive, customer service infrastructure for law enforcement with the goal of improving communication and transparency between agency and community.

Overview of the Technology
The SPIDR Tech Platform is designed to incorporate relevant data from your agency’s Records Management System (RMS) and/or Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system to automatically generate and send customized text and email messages to victims of crime and reporting parties. Subsequently, customers will receive mobile-friendly surveys comprised of questions chosen by your agency that can be utilized to measure community trust and satisfaction.

The platform offered in this proposal is entirely Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and requires no hardware to be installed locally with the agency. The software can be accessed using any modern browser, such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.

Your agency can push data to the SPIDR Tech Platform via our Application Program Interface (API), or the SPIDR Tech deployment team can read data from a server through a secure connection.

Supporting Customer CJIS and Security Requirements
Working with law enforcement data requires special security considerations, and SPIDR Tech supports these requirements. We perform background checks on all employees and will subject all project personnel to a agency background checks if requested. Our teams have passed all FBI screenings in the past for projects with other law enforcement agencies.

of 2 19

SPIDR Tech uses Amazon Web Services (AWS) GovCloud for data hosting. AWS follows Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) compliance guidelines and we possess all supporting documentation detailing our compliance. Our data center is in the USA, an isolated AWS region, and is used for highly sensitive workloads.

It is important to note that SPIDR Tech does not install, own, or manage any equipment within your agency’s network. Our services are hosted in the cloud, and the networks talk to each other via a secure Virtual Private Network (VPN) or API.

SPIDR Tech utilizes a Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption method to encrypt CJIS data at rest, including database backups and volumes. As an additional precaution, The SPIDR Tech Platform encrypts CJI data such as driver's licenses and social security numbers if an agency chooses to provide those items as part of the data transfer.

Description of the SPIDR Tech Platform Modules
9-1-1 Module
The 9-1-1 Module integrates with your Computer Aided
Dispatch (CAD) to automatically send text messages to
your reporting parties (RPs) after a CAD Event is generated.

Your agency can customize these messages based on CAD
event type to provide RPs with a “receipt” for their call. You can also include helpful information, such as a link to online reporting or a non-emergency number to call if the RP has an update.

Delayed Arrival Messages
Delayed Arrival Messages automatically update an RP if an officer has not marked themselves on scene for a
predetermined period of time. For example, if a loud party call has been queued for 60 minutes, the SPIDR Tech
platform can send an automated text message to the RP,
explaining that priority call volume is high and an officer will respond to their incident as soon as one is available.

When there is a delay in service, proactively sending an RP information regarding the status of an officer response will help set expectations and prevent frequent call-backs that occupy dispatch lines and resources.

of 3 19

Example CAD Event Categories:

Investigations Module
The Investigations Module will integrate
with your RMS to automatically
generate and send customized text and
email messages to victims of crime.

These messages will decrease
administrative calls to your records and
investigations departments by
proactively providing the most
commonly requested information. Case
studies have shown that victims of
crime who receive SPIDR Tech emails
and texts are 43% less likely to call
asking for more information regarding
their case.

For specific crime categories, the system will send the victim a tailored message that can include critical report information, including (but not limited to):

Disturbances Battery Dead Body Report Hit and Run
Suspicious Circumstances Assault Deadly Weapon Found Person Drunk Driver Thefts Indecent Exposure Found Property Violation Restraining Order Illegal Parking Criminal Threats Found Weapon Annoyance/Threat Animal Incidents Arson Group Fight Abandoned Vehicle
Vehicle Accidents Embezzlement Harassment/Stalking Animal Bite Patrol Requests Identity Theft Hazard Missing Person
Transient Person Defrauding an Innkeeper Illegal Dumping Health and Safety Burglary Vandalism Keep Peace Shots Heard
Mentally Ill Graffiti Lost Animal Mandown
Forgeries Trespassing Lost Person Drunk/Drugs in Public Robbery Lewd Conduct Lost Property Stolen Vehicle
of 4 19

Example Crime Categories:

Arrest Notifications
Arrest Notifications are automated messages
that can be sent to victims of any crime.

These notifications automatically inform
victims that an arrest has been made
pertaining to their report. Today, many
agencies don’t inform victims when an arrest
has been made and those that do, do so
manually via phone call, or through the use of
an opt-in, victim registration system. Doing
so manually is difficult to track and is costly
due to the amount of necessary labor. Using
a victim registration system puts the burden
of work on the crime victim. By automatically
notifying victims of an arrest, you can
decrease the amount of administrative effort
required by your agency while raising the bar
for customer service.

•Date and time of report filing •General category of the crime •Name of officer/deputy who took the report •Report number •Who to contact and when •Next step in investigation process •Investigation criteria •Crime prevention tips
•Crime definitions •Victim resources information
•Advocacy information •Community outreach/program information •Social media links •Upcoming events
Auto Burglary Burglary Theft
Assault/Battery Robbery Forgery
Arson Assault with a Deadly Weapon Brandishing a Weapon Carjacking Court Order Violation Criminal Threats
Fraud False Imprisonment Hit and Run
Vandalism Prowling Shoplifting
Stalking Trespassing Traffic Accident Report
Fraud Forgery Identity Theft
of 5 19

Multi-Lingual Functionality
Your message templates can be sent in
up to three languages. For example,
Monterey Park Police Department in
California sends all of their messages in
English, Traditional Mandarin, and
Spanish. The agency can also solicit
survey responses in multiple languages.

This feature allows your agency to be
inclusive of minority or majority members
of the community, ensuring people
receive the information they need in a
language they understand.

Insights Module
Surveys are delivered to the RP and crime
victim via email and/or text message
following an interaction with your agency.

These surveys enable you to benchmark
and track community perception.

Requesting feedback is a common and
valuable practice for the private sector.

Companies use this data to improve
services, track initiatives, and identify
weaknesses. Today, agencies understand
they cannot improve without measuring
their interactions with the community.

It’s important to note that these surveys
are sent based on incident, allowing you to
measure each community interaction
independently. This is different from public
sentiment surveys, which include survey
responses from individuals who have never interacted with your agency.

By surveying your customers regularly, you can include monthly survey trends in your CompStat model, relay officer/dispatcher commendations that reinforce positive community interactions, and identify issues before they become liabilities.

SPIDR Tech will provide agency personnel with daily survey updates containing survey responses, as well as more in-depth survey analysis reports on a periodic basis. All survey response data can be broken down by area, crime type, call type and date.

of 6 19

Victim Portal
The Victim Portal is an application embedded
in your website that enables victims of crime
to access case details with authentication. As
part of the deployment of this module, SPIDR
Tech will migrate both historic and new data,
as well as cold cases.

Community Engagement Module

This module is a one-to-many text
message response through our
SPIDR Engage platform and is
currently being utilized by the San
Antonio Police Department. This
additional module is called the
Community Engagement Module,
and allows an agency to utilize the
survey sent at the end of an
interaction to ask if the recipient
would like to opt-in to additional
message “blasts” from the agency.

The Community Engagement
Module automatically builds a list of
opted-in individuals for which the
agency can create additional
messaging campaigns in a one-to-many message format. For further information, please visit the San Antonio Police Department website to see press releases detailing this new module.

of 7 19

Pricing
SPIDR Tech software pricing has two components: The initial, one-time deployment fee and the annual subscription cost. The deployment fee includes all technical and non-technical interfaces and the subscription cost includes all messages (text and email), data storage, feature updates, maintenance and professional services.

Platinum Package
SPIDR Tech: Year 1 Price
SPIDR Platform Subscription Includes:

•9-1-1 Module

•Investigations Module

•Insights Module

•Portal Module

•Community Engagement Module

•Choice of custom short code or long code

•Custom interfaces built by SPIDR Tech or pair-programmed with your team

•Unlimited User Acceptance Testing

•Custom reporting available

•Daily Survey Update Emails

•Standard monthly report

•Assigned SPIDR Tech Account Manager

•Unlimited adjustments to the interface

•24/7 interface monitoring

•Initial translation service included for up to 2 additional languages
$19,305
Deployment and Installation Deployment and installation fee (one-time setup/integration fee)$10,000 Full Maintenance and Support
Unlimited maintenance and support, unlimited changes to settings, messages, surveys, and configurations post go-live, assigned Customer Success Manager
FREE
Discount Pending technical discovery meeting -$7,500
Total:$21,805
SPIDR Tech: Optional Years 2 and 3 Price
SPIDR Platform Subscription Annual subscription fee for each additional year of service $19,305 Full Maintenance and Support
Unlimited maintenance and support, unlimited changes to settings, messages, surveys, and configurations post go-live, assigned Customer Success Manager
FREE
Total:$19,305
of 8 19

TERM:

Please note: All pricing and discounts described in this Order Form are contingent upon Customer's execution and return of this Order Form no later than 10/31/2022 (unless countersigned by SPIDR Tech).

By signing below, each party acknowledges that it has carefully read and fully understood this Agreement, and each agrees to be bound by the terms of the Agreement. The Agreement becomes effective upon the date of last signature (the "Effective Date"). The individuals signing this Agreement represent that they have the authority to bind the respective parties to the terms of this Agreement.

SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

This Subscription Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made as of [__________________], 202[__] (the “Effective Date”), by and between SPIDR Tech Inc., a Delaware corporation addressable at P.O. Box 3448, Manhattan Beach, CA, 90266 (“SPIDR Tech”), and the Customer identified in the attached Sales Proposal. SPIDR Tech and Customer may be referred to as a “Party” herein and together as the “Parties.” The Sales Proposal executed by and between SPIDR Tech and the Customer (the “Sales Proposal”) and the terms therein shall be deemed incorporated herein.

WHEREAS, SPIDR Tech’s proprietary systems, applications and related APIs permit police departments to gather, review and analyze data in connection with law enforcement intelligence, officer productivity and related community engagement.

WHEREAS, Customer desires to access and use SPIDR Tech’s proprietary system, and SPIDR Tech desires to provide such access, in accordance with the terms and conditions herein;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants set forth herein, SPIDR Tech and Customer hereby agree as follows:

1.Provision of the Service.

1.1.Provision Generally. SPIDR Tech will provide Customer with access to SPIDR Tech’s proprietary service for the modules specified in the Sales Proposal (collectively the “Service”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In order to access and use the Service, Customer is responsible at its own expense for obtaining its own Internet access, and any hardware and software required therefor.

SPIDR Tech, Inc.Agency
Signature:Signature:

Name: Rahul Sidhu Name:

Title: President Title:

Date Signed: Date signed:
of 9 19
10/12/2022

1.2.Grant of Rights. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, SPIDR Tech hereby grants to Customer a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable right to access and use the Service, solely for Customer’s purposes during the Term. All rights not expressly granted to Customer are reserved by SPIDR Tech and its licensors. There are no implied rights.

1.3.Restrictions. Customer shall not (and shall not allow any third party to): (a) use the Service for the benefit of any third party, or to develop or market any product, software or service that is functionally similar to or derivative of the Service, or for any other purpose not expressly permitted herein; (b) permit any third party or individual to access or use the Service; (c) sell, distribute, rent, lease, service bureau, post, link, disclose or provide access to the Service, directly or indirectly, to any third party; (d) alter, modify, debug, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, or otherwise attempt to derive or gain access to any software (including source code) associated with the Service; or (e) use any robot, spider, scraper or other automated means to access the Service, or engage in any scraping, data-mining, harvesting, screen-scraping, data aggregating or indexing of the Service. Customer shall keep all passwords and API Keys provided to it safe and secure, and shall be responsible for all use of the Service using passwords or API keys issued to Customer. Customer shall notify SPIDR Tech immediately of any actual or suspected unauthorized use of its passwords or API keys for the Service. Without limiting any of its other rights or remedies, SPIDR Tech reserves the right to suspend access to the Service if SPIDR Tech reasonably believes that Customer has materially violated the restrictions and obligations in this Agreement (in which case, it shall provide Customer prompt written notice of such suspension).

1.4.Customer Cooperation. Customer shall: (a) reasonably cooperate with SPIDR Tech in all matters relating to the Service; (b) respond promptly to any SPIDR Tech request to provide information, approvals, authorizations or decisions that are reasonably necessary for SPIDR Tech to provide the Service in accordance with this Agreement; and (c) provide such Customer materials or information as SPIDR Tech may reasonably request to provide the Service and ensure that such materials or information are complete and accurate in all material respects.

2.SPIDR Tech Technology. In connection with providing the Service, SPIDR Tech and its licensors shall operate and support the hosted environment used by SPIDR Tech to provide the Service, including the SPIDR Tech Technology, the server hardware, disk storage, firewall protection, server operating systems, management programs, web server programs, documentation and all other technology or information so used by SPIDR Tech. As used herein, “SPIDR Tech Technology ” means all of SPIDR Tech’s proprietary technology (including software, hardware, products, processes, algorithms, user interfaces, know-how, techniques, designs and other tangible or intangible technical material or information) made available to Customer by SPIDR Tech in providing the Service.

of 10 19

3.Downtime. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, SPIDR Tech shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide access to the Service for twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week throughout the term of this Agreement. Customer agrees that from time to time the Service may be inaccessible or inoperable for various reasons, including (i) equipment malfunctions; (ii) periodic maintenance procedures or repairs which SPIDR Tech may undertake from time to time; or (iii) causes beyond the control of SPIDR Tech or which are not reasonably foreseeable by SPIDR Tech, including interruption or failure of telecommunication or digital transmission links, hostile network attacks or network congestion or other failures, or failures or issues experienced by the Hosting Contractors independent of and not related to the Service or SPIDR Tech (collectively “Downtime”). SPIDR Tech shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide twenty-four (24) hour advance notice to Customer in the event of any scheduled Downtime. SPIDR Tech shall have no obligation during performance of such operations to mirror Customer Data on any other server or to transfer Customer Data to any other server. SPIDR Tech shall use commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any disruption, inaccessibility and/or inoperability of the service in connection with Downtime, whether scheduled or not.

4.Ownership. Customer acknowledges and agrees that as between SPIDR Tech and Customer, all right, title and interest in and to the Service (including the data, information, text, images, designs, sound, music, marks, logos, compilations (meaning the collection, arrangement and assembly of information) and other content on or made available through the Service, other than Customer Data), the SPIDR Tech Technology and all improvements and derivatives of the foregoing (including all intellectual property and proprietary rights embodied therein or associated therewith) are and shall remain owned by SPIDR Tech or its licensors, and this Agreement in no way conveys any right, title or interest in the Service or the SPIDR Tech Technology other than a limited right to use the Service in accordance with the terms and conditions herein. No right or license is granted hereunder to Customer under any trademarks, service marks, trade names or logos. Customer shall not remove any SPIDR Tech trademark, service mark or logo, or any proprietary notices or labels (including any copyright or trademark notices) from the Service.

5.Fees; Payments; Taxes.

5.1.Fees. In consideration of the provision of the Service hereunder, Customer shall pay SPIDR Tech the fees as set forth and the scheduled laid out on the Sales Proposal.

5.2.Taxes. All amounts due hereunder are exclusive of all sales, use, excise, service, value added, or other taxes, duties and charges of any kind (whether foreign, federal, state, local or other) associated with this Agreement, the Service, or Customer’s access to the Service. Customer shall be solely responsible for all such taxes, duties and charges (except for taxes imposed on SPIDR Tech’s income), which may be invoiced by SPIDR Tech from time-to-time.

of 11 19

5.3.Payment Method. Customer shall make all payments hereunder, in US dollars, in the manner specified by SPIDR Tech, and without deduction of any charges, taxes or other amounts.

5.4.Late Payments. Customer shall pay interest on all late payments at the lesser of (a) 1.5% per month or (b) the highest rate permissible under applicable law, calculated daily and compounded monthly. Customer shall reimburse SPIDR Tech for all costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in collecting any unpaid amounts owed by Customer hereunder.

6.Term; Termination.

6.1.Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and, unless earlier terminated as set forth herein, shall continue for three (3) fiscal years. Either Party may terminate this Agreement by providing the other Party 30 days advance written notice of its desire to terminate. The entire term before termination is collectively referred to as the “Term” herein.

6.2.Termination for Breach. Either Party may terminate this Agreement by written notice thereof to the other Party, if the other Party materially breaches this Agreement and does not cure such breach within 30 days after written notice thereof.

6.3.Effects of Termination; Survival. Upon any termination of this Agreement:
(a) all rights granted to Customer hereunder shall terminate and SPIDR Tech shall no longer provide access to the Service to Customer, and (b) Customer shall cease using the Service. Any obligations that have accrued prior to termination shall survive termination of this Agreement. In addition, the following Sections, as well as any other provisions herein which by their nature should survive, shall survive termination of this Agreement: Sections 4 through 12.

7.Customer Data.

7.1.Data Generally. All data and information which the Customer inputs or provides to the Service (the “Customer Data”) is stored in a private and secure fashion (as regulated by CJIS requirements), and will not be used by SPIDR Tech except as permitted herein. Customer hereby grants to SPIDR Tech a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, royalty-free right to use, reproduce, manipulate, display, transmit and distribute the Customer Data solely in connection with providing the Service to Customer, and improving and developing the Service. In addition, SPIDR Tech may analyze Customer Data, and data of other customers, to create aggregated or anonymized statistics or data that do not identify Customer or any individual, and SPIDR Tech may during and after the Term use and disclose such statistics or data in its discretion. Except as specified otherwise in this Agreement (including the Sales Proposal), Customer shall be solely responsible for providing, updating, uploading and maintaining all Customer Data. The content of Customer Data shall be Customer’s sole responsibility. SPIDR Tech shall operate the Service in a manner that provides of 12 19

reasonable information security for Customer Data, using commercially reasonable data backup, security, and recovery protections (as regulated by CJIS requirements).

7.2.Additional Customer Responsibilities. Customer is solely responsible for all Customer Data. SPIDR Tech does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of Customer Data. Customer shall not: (a) upload or otherwise make available to SPIDR Tech any Customer Data that is unlawful or that violates the rights of any third parties; (b) upload or otherwise make available to SPIDR Tech any Customer Data that Customer does not have a right to transmit due to any law, rule, regulation or other obligation; (c) use, upload or otherwise transmit any Customer Data that infringes any intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any third party; (d) upload or otherwise make available to SPIDR Tech any material that contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy, limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; (e) interfere with or disrupt the Service or servers or networks connected to the Service; (f) upload or otherwise make available to SPIDR Tech any Customer Data that constitutes protected health information subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or any regulation, rule or standards issued thereunder; or (g) violate any applicable law, rule or regulation, including those regarding the export of technical data.

8.Representations and Warranties; Disclaimer.

8.1.General Representations and Warranties. Each Party hereby represents and warrants to the other Party that: (a) it is a corporation, company or other entity (as applicable) duly organized, validly existing and in good standing in its jurisdiction of organization; (b) its execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary organizational action on its part; (c) the provisions set forth in this Agreement constitute legal, valid, and binding obligations of such Party enforceable against such Party in accordance with their terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting creditors’ rights generally; and (d) its execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement do not and will not conflict with, result in a breach of, constitute a default under, or require the consent of any third party under, any agreement or other obligation to which such Party is subject.

8.2.SPIDR Tech Limited Warranty. SPIDR Tech warrants that it will provide the Service in a competent and workmanlike manner. SPIDR Tech does not warrant that it will be able to correct all reported defects or that use of the Service will be uninterrupted or error free. SPIDR Tech makes no warranty regarding features or services provided by any third parties. SPIDR Tech retains the right to modify its services and the SPIDR Tech Technology in its sole discretion; provided that doing so does not have a material adverse impact on the Service hereunder.

Customer’s sole remedy for SPIDR Tech’s breach of the warranty in this paragraph shall be that SPIDR Tech shall remedy the applicable error, or if SPIDR Tech is unable to do so in a timely manner, refund to Customer actual damages of 13 19

up to a limit of the fees paid for the Service for the 6-month period immediately prior to when the breach of warranty occurred.

8.3.Disclaimer. EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS

8.1-8.2 ABOVE, SPIDR TECH MAKES NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY

WHATSOEVER, AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL REPRESENTATIONS AND

WARRANTIES, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE (IN EACH CASE WHETHER

EXPRESS OR IMPLIED BY LAW, COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF

PERFORMANCE, USAGE OF TRADE OR OTHERWISE), INCLUDING ANY

WARRANTY (A) OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR

PURPOSE, OR NONINFRINGEMENT, (B) THAT THE SERVICE WILL MEET CUSTOMER’S REQUIREMENTS, WILL ALWAYS BE AVAILABLE, ACCESSIBLE,

UNINTERRUPTED, TIMELY, SECURE OR OPERATE WITHOUT ERROR, (C) AS

TO THE RESULTS THAT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE SERVICE,

OR (D) AS TO THE ACCURACY OR RELIABILITY OF ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE SERVICE.

9.Limitations of Liability.

9.1.Damages Cap. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMISSIBLE BY LAW, SPIDR TECH’S TOTAL LIABILITY FOR ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED

TO THE SERVICE OR THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL

AMOUNT OF FEES PAID BY CUSTOMER TO SPIDR TECH UNDER THIS AGREEMENT DURING THE PRIOR 6 MONTHS.

9.2.Disclaimer of Indirect Damages. EXCEPT FOR (A) CUSTOMER’S

OBLIGATION TO PAY ALL AMOUNTS DUE HEREUNDER, (B) ITS

INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS OR (C) ITS BREACH OF ANY INTELLECTUAL

PROPERTY OR CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS HEREIN (INCLUDING ANY LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF THE SERVICE),

IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT,

CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE

DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOSS OF DATA, PROFITS OR REVENUE) ARISING OUT

OF OR RELATED TO THE SERVICE OR THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER SUCH

DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE.

9.3.Basis of the Bargain. THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THE LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 9 ARE A FUNDAMENTAL BASIS OF

THE BARGAIN, THAT SPIDR TECH HAS SET ITS FEES IN RELIANCE ON THE

ENFORCEABILITY OF THESE PROVISIONS, AND THAT THEY SHALL APPLY

NOTWITHSTANDING THAT ANY REMEDY SHALL FAIL ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE.

10.Indemnification.

10.1.SPIDR Tech Indemnification. SPIDR Tech shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Customer and its directors, officers, employees and agents (“Customer Indemnified Parties”) from and against any third party claims, actions, of 14 19

proceedings, demands, lawsuits, damages, liabilities and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs) (collectively, “Claims”) to the extent based on any claim that the Service infringes, misappropriates or otherwise violates (collectively, “Infringes”) any third party intellectual property or proprietary right (excluding patents).

10.2.Customer Indemnification. Customer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless SPIDR Tech and its directors, officers, employees, agents and providers (“SPIDR Tech Indemnified Parties”) from and against any Claims to the extent based on any claim that the Customer Data Infringes any third party intellectual property or proprietary right (excluding patents).

10.3.Indemnification Process. As conditions of the indemnification obligations in Sections 10.1-10.2 above: (a) the applicable Customer Indemnified Party or SPIDR Tech Indemnified Party (the “Indemnitee”) will provide the indemnifying Party (the “Indemnitor”) with prompt written notice of any Claim for which indemnification is sought (provided that failure to so notify will not remove the Indemnitor’s indemnification obligations except to the extent it is prejudiced thereby), (b) the Indemnitee will permit the Indemnitor to control the defense and settlement of such Claim, and (c) the Indemnitee will reasonably cooperate with the Indemnitor in connection with the Indemnitor’s evaluation, defense and settlement of such Claim. In defending any Claim, the Indemnitor shall use counsel reasonably satisfactory to the other Party. The Indemnitor shall not settle or compromise any such Claim or consent to the entry of any judgment without the prior written consent of the other Party (not unreasonably withheld).

10.4.Exclusions. SPIDR Tech’s obligations in Section 10.1 above shall not apply to any Claim to the extent arising from or relating to (a) misuse of the Service (including any use not strictly in accordance with the documentation therefor, SPIDR Tech’s instructions, and this Agreement), (b) any modification, alteration or conversion of the Service not created or approved in writing by SPIDR Tech, (c) any combination of the Service with any computer, hardware, software or service not provided by SPIDR Tech, (d) SPIDR Tech’s compliance with specifications or other requirements of Customer, or (e) any third party data or Customer Data. If the Service is or may be subject to a Claim of Infringement described in Section

10.1 above, SPIDR Tech may, at its cost and sole discretion: (i) obtain the right for Customer to continue using the Service as contemplated herein; or (ii) replace or modify the Service so that it becomes non-Infringing without substantially compromising its principal functions; or (iii) to the extent the foregoing are not commercially reasonable, terminate this Agreement and return to Customer any pre-paid fees for the Service associated with the then-remaining Term. SPIDR Tech’s obligations in this Section 10 shall be SPIDR Tech’s sole obligations, and Customer’s sole remedies, in the event of any Infringement of intellectual property or proprietary rights by or related to to the Service.

11.Confidentiality.

11.1.Definition. “Confidential Information” means information that is disclosed by either Party (the “Disclosing Party”) to the other Party (the “Receiving Party”) of 15 19

hereunder during the Term that is clearly labeled or identified as confidential or proprietary when disclosed, or that, under the circumstances, should reasonably be treated as confidential, except that “Confidential Information” shall not include any information that (a) is or becomes generally known to the public through no fault of, or breach of this Agreement by, the Receiving Party; (b) is rightfully in the Receiving Party’s possession at the time of disclosure without an obligation of confidentiality; (c) is independently developed by the Receiving Party without use of the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information; or (d) is rightfully obtained by the Receiving Party from a third party without restriction on use or disclosure. In addition, (i) the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be Confidential Information of both Parties; and (ii) the Service and SPIDR Tech Technology shall be deemed Confidential Information of SPIDR Tech, regardless of whether or not they are labeled or identified, or would reasonably be considered confidential.

11.2.General Obligations. Each Party agrees that it will during the Term and thereafter (a) not disclose the other Party’s Confidential Information to any third party (other than as permitted in the last sentence of this paragraph); (b) use the other Party’s Confidential Information only to the extent reasonably necessary to perform its obligations or exercise its rights under this Agreement; (c) disclose the other Party’s Confidential Information only to those of its employees and independent contractors who reasonably need to know such information for purposes of this Agreement and who are bound by confidentiality obligations offering substantially similar protection to those in this Section 11; and (d) protect all Confidential Information of the other Party from unauthorized use, access, or disclosure in the same manner as it protects its own confidential information of a similar nature, and in no event with less than reasonable care. Notwithstanding the above, this paragraph shall not prohibit: (i) a Party from disclosing Confidential Information of the other Party to the extent required by applicable law, rule or regulation (including a court order or other government order) or the rules and regulations of the SEC or any national securities exchange; provided that such Party provides the other Party prior written notice of such disclosure, to the extent practicable, and reasonably cooperates with efforts of the other Party to seek confidential treatment thereof, to the extent such cooperation is requested by the other Party; or (ii) a Party from disclosing the terms and conditions of this Agreement to its attorneys and financial advisors, or current or potential lenders, other sources of financing, investors or acquirors; provided that such third parties are bound by confidentiality obligations offering substantially similar protection to those in this Section 11 (provided further that such third parties are only permitted to use such information for the purpose of advising, lending or providing financing to, or investing in or acquiring, such Party, as applicable).

11.3.Return or Destruction. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, the Receiving Party will return to the Disclosing Party, or destroy or erase, the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information in tangible form, upon the termination of this Agreement; provided that (a) Receiving Party may retain a copy of 16 19

of Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information solely for the purposes of tracking Receiving Party’s rights and obligations hereunder with respect thereto, (b) Receiving Party may retain copies of Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information solely to the extent required by law or by applicable professional standards which require such Party to retain copies of its working papers, and (c) Receiving Party may retain Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information solely to the extent reasonably necessary for Receiving Party to exercise rights or perform obligations under this Agreement that survive such termination.

11.4.Feedback. Notwithstanding the above or anything to the contrary herein, to the extent that Customer at any time provides SPIDR Tech with any feedback or suggestions regarding the Service, including potential improvements or changes thereto (collectively, “Feedback”), the Feedback shall not be considered Confidential Information of Customer, and SPIDR Tech shall be free to use, disclose, and otherwise exploit in any manner, the Feedback for any purpose.

12.Miscellaneous.

12.1.Compliance with Laws. Each Party shall comply with all laws, rules, regulations and ordinances applicable to its activities hereunder.

12.2.Hosting Providers. Customer acknowledges that the Service is hosted by third party hosting providers (the “Hosting Contractors”). SPIDR Tech may change its Hosting Contractors at any time. Customer’s use of the Service is subject to any applicable restrictions imposed by the Hosting Contractors.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, SPIDR Tech shall not be liable for any problems, failures, defects or errors with the Service to the extent caused by the Hosting Contractors. Customer acknowledges that the fees payable for the Service reflect the fact that SPIDR Tech is not responsible for the acts and omissions of the Hosting Contractors.

12.3.Assignment. Customer may not assign this Agreement, or assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations under this Agreement, without the prior written consent of SPIDR Tech. SPIDR Tech may freely assign this Agreement, or assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations under this Agreement.

Any purported assignment or delegation in violation of this paragraph is null and void. This Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of each Party’s successor and permitted assigns.

12.4.Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement (including the Sales Proposal attached hereto) contains the complete understanding and agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements or understandings, oral or written, with respect thereto. No pre-printed terms on any purchase order, invoice or similar document issued in relation to this Agreement shall have any effect on the Parties or this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by an express written agreement signed by duly authorized representatives of both Parties.

12.5.Notices. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all notices required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and may be delivered of 17 19

personally, or may be sent by facsimile, overnight delivery or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses provided in the Sales Proposal.

12.6.Force Majeure. SPIDR Tech shall not be liable or responsible to Customer, nor be considered to have defaulted or breached this Agreement, for any failure or delay in fulfilling or performing any provision of this Agreement to the extent such failure or delay is caused by or results from any act, circumstance or other cause beyond the reasonable control of SPIDR Tech, including acts of God, flood, fire, earthquake, explosion, governmental actions, war, invasion or hostilities (whether war is declared or not), terrorist threats or acts, riot, or other civil unrest, national emergency, revolution, insurrection, epidemic, lockouts, strikes or other labor disputes (whether or not relating to either Party's workforce), or restraints or delays affecting carriers or inability or delay in obtaining supplies of adequate or suitable technology or components, telecommunication breakdown, or power outage.

12.7.Publicity. SPIDR Tech shall have the right to use Customer’s name and logo on client lists published on SPIDR Tech’s website and in marketing materials.

SPIDR Tech may announce the relationship hereunder in a press release provided that SPIDR Tech obtains Customer’s prior approval of the wording of the release (not to be unreasonably withheld).

12.8.Choice of Law. This Agreement is and will be governed by and construed under the laws of California USA, without giving effect to any conflicts of laws provision thereof or of any other jurisdiction that would produce a contrary result.

The Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction of any federal or state court located in the state of California for any claim or other proceeding related to this Agreement or their activities hereunder, and waive any objections of improper venue or inconvenient forum.

12.9.Injunctive Relief. Each Party acknowledges that its breach of any intellectual property or confidentiality obligations or restrictions herein (including any limitations or restrictions on use of the Service) will cause substantial harm to the other Party that could not be remedied by payment of damages alone.

Accordingly, the other Party will be entitled to seek preliminary, temporary and permanent injunctive relief, and other equitable relief, for any such breach, without any requirement to post bond, in any court of competent jurisdiction.

12.10.Relationship of the Parties. The relationship between the Parties is that of independent contractors. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as creating any agency, partnership, joint venture or other form of joint enterprise or employment relationship between the Parties, and neither Party shall have authority to contract for or bind the other Party in any manner whatsoever.

12.11.Waiver. No waiver by either Party of any of the provision of this Agreement is effective unless explicitly set forth in writing and signed by such Party. No failure to exercise, or delay in exercising, any right, remedy, power or privilege arising from this Agreement operates, or may be construed, as a waiver thereof. of 18 19

No single or partial exercise of any right, remedy, power or privilege hereunder precludes any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy, power or privilege.

12.12.Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement or invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction.

12.13.Headings; Interpretation. Headings are provided for convenience only and will not be used to interpret the substance of this Agreement. Unless the intent is expressly otherwise in specific instances, use of the words “include,” “includes,” or “including” in this Agreement shall not be limiting and “or” shall not be exclusive.

12.14.Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two counterparts (which may be delivered by .pdf or other facsimile format acceptable to the Parties), each of which shall be an original and both of which taken together shall form one agreement.

of 19 19

Proprietary and Confidential

SPIDR Tech Sole Source Justification

Date: October 11, 2022

To: The Office of Finance/Office of Procurement

Re: Sole Source Justification for SPIDR Tech Engage

SPIDR Tech is pleased to provide you with this sole source justification letter for the SPIDR Engage system. SPIDR Tech, powered by Versaterm Public Safety, is a Versaterm-owned company. SPIDR Tech is the sole provider of the SPIDR Engage system. No other product can provide all the functionality of the SPIDR Engage system. SPIDR Tech offers a unique solution, and is the only company to provide the following:
• The SPIDR Engage system covers all aspects of messaging to customers for a public safety agency, including acknowledgement, updates, and survey feedback. SPIDR Tech is the only product that provides configurable messages for all the following:
• CAD Call Acknowledgement Messages, configurable by call type • CAD Call Delay Messages, configurable by call type
• More than one type of customized CAD Survey, configurable by call type • Victim Acknowledgement Messages, sent via email and SMS, determined by RMS data, configurable by offense code
• Investigation Update Messages, sent via email and SMS, determined by RMS data, configurable by case status code
• Arrest Notification Messages, sent via email and SMS, determined by RMS data • Victim Acknowledgement Surveys, customizable to your needs, sent via email and SMS
• Investigation Update Surveys, customizable to your needs, sent via email and SMS • Custom white-labeled domain names, determined by your organization

Proprietary and Confidential

• The ability to use either a short code or long code, with a dedicated phone line for your organization.
• The ability to gather, create, and maintain a list of future opted-in community members for further engagement. This list can be segmented by zip code, demographic, neighborhood, age, etc.
• SPDIR Tech offers many different opportunities to survey your community. Surveys can be customized and updated to fit the agency’s needs. Other survey products require the agency to limit questions or require specific questions with no customization available. • SPIDR Tech is the only company with a Spotlight dashboard, which showcases all message activity and scores for each of your unique surveys.
• SPIDR Tech provides onshore development and support in the United States of America.

Elon Kaiserman
Co-Founder
SPIDR Tech

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.H .

D A T E :N ovem b er 1 4, 2 02 2
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : M A R C E LO A . B L A N C O, P O L I C E C H I E F

C L I F F M A T H E W S, P O L I C E C A P TA I N

LO N T E A G U E , P O L I C E L I E U T E N A N T
S U B J E C T :A P P R O V E T H E P U R C H A S E O F 4 0 M M L E S S L E T H A L M U N I T I O N

L A U N C H E R S, A M M U N I T I O N , A N D T R A I N I N G R O U N D S

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m en d ed t h at t h e C i ty C ou n c il ap p rove t he p u rchase of fift een 40 m m Less L eth al M u nition L au n ch ers , 20 0 rou n d s , train in g roun d s, and 15 hard cas es; an d au th ori ze t he u se of F Y 17 /18 C op s G rant fun d s for the p urch ase.

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th e p rop osed act ion su p p ort s t h e C it y’s g oal of p rovi d i n g safe an d effective law en forcem en t services for th e resid ents of U p land .

B A C K G R O U N D
Th e U p l an d Police D ep artm en t cu rren t ly u ses a b ean b ag shotg u n as on e of i ts less leth al op t i on s. T he b ean b ag sh otg un s h oot s a 1 -oun ce sack of lead p ellets as i ts m u nition. T he op erational rang e for th e b ean b ag rou n d is 2 1-7 5 feet. Th e u s e of th e b ean b ag rou nd can b e con sid ered l eth al force w hen used wi th in 2 1 feet an d will lose it s accuracy an d effi ci en c y after th e d istance of 75 feet.

Th e 4 0m m is a sh ould er fired less leth al w eap on t hat u ses a p rop ellan t cartrid g e to lau nch p rojectiles th at are m ad e from soft foam rub b er. T hese soft foam ru b b er rou nd s are referred to as exact im p act sp on g e roun d s. T he 4 0m m lau ncher is a si ng le sh ot weap on and is accurate u p to 12 0 feet and can also b e u tilized at a m in im um d istance of 5 feet

W ith th e 4 0m m m un ition s, th e m in im u m stand off i s 5 feet from th e end of th e m u zzle. T he op erational rang e i s 5 -12 0 feet with s im il ar accu racy an d effic ien cy b etween t h os e d istances.

Th e op erati on al rang e on th e 4 0m m is m u ch m ore su itab le for p at rol with th e variet y of scenarios th ey face on a d aily b asis.

Th e 4 0m m lau n c h er w il l rep lac e th e exi st in g b ean b ag s h ot g u n . T he law en forcem en t com m u nity has m oved t ow ard s the 40 m m lau ncher d ue to i ts effective ran g e, less l ikel y to cau se g reat b od ily in jury and ease of u se.

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
Th e 4 0m m laun ch er offers m ore op t ion s to t h e p atrol officer t h an th e b ean b ag shot g u n. T he b ean b ag sh ot g u n h as a l eth al ran g e u nd er 21 feet , t h e 4 0 m m lau ncher can b e d ep loyed as close as 5 feet. Th e m axim u m effec ti ve ran g e of t he b ean b ag is ap p roxim atel y 7 5 feet, an d at th at d is tan ce accuracy i s q u estion ab le. Th e m axi m u m effect ive ran g e of t h e 40 m m lau nc her is ap p roxim ately 1 20 feet wi th li tt le ch ang e in acc uracy. T h e b ean b ag sh otg un sh oots a 1 -oun ce lead p roject ile th at h as a sm all su rfac e area and h as the p oten ti al t o cause seriou s i n ju ry at th e recom m en d ed rang e. T he 40 m m m u n it ion is a soft foam p rojec ti le th at h as a larg er su rface area an d h as a less likely chan ce of causin g serious in jury.

A n oth er issue t h at is c onc ern in g ab ou t t he B ean b ag S h otg un and it s b ean b ag rou nd is they look al m ost i d en ti cal t o th e leth al 1 2 G au g e S h otg un and sl u g roun d . A lthou g h the Police D ep artm ent h as t aken st ep s t o keep t h e let h al 1 2 G aug e S hot g u n and less-lethal B eanb ag S h otg un an d t h ei r m u n i ti on s s ep arated , a B ean b ag S hotg u n c an sh oot a leth al slug roun d .

Th e chan ce of this hap p en in g is m in iscu le b u t in a hig h -st ress situ ation, th e chan ce of h um an error i s always p resent. W ith t h e 4 0m m l aun ch er, t here is zero ch ance of l oad i n g and firin g a lethal rou nd .

Th e Pol ic e D ep artm ent recei ved q uot es from th ree com p anies an d C u rt is B lu e L in e p rovid ed th e lowest q uote for the laun ch ers and P roForce p rovid ed the low est q u ote for th e b ag s an d m u nitions.

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
Th ere w il l b e n o fi sc al i m p act to t he G en eral F u nd . Th e p u rchase of 15 L M T 40 m m lau nchers, train in g roun d s, 20 0 soft tip m u n it ion s, and 15 h ard c ases will b e ap p roxim atel y $23 ,52 1.3 9 d ollars. T he fu nd s wou ld com e from C O P S G rant F Y 17 /18 .

A L T E R N A T I V E S
P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
Curtis Blue L ine L ess Lethal L aunchers Quote
ProF orce M unitions Quote
ProF orce 40mm Carrying Case Quote

Ph: 562-863-1702
[email protected]
CBL Santa Fe Springs
15523 Carmenita Road
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
www.CurtisBlueLine.com
Quotation No. 239086

Quotation
CUSTOMER:SHIP TO:

Upland City Police Department
1499 West 13th Street
Upland CA 91786
Upland City Police Department
1499 W 13th St
Upland CA 91786
QUOTATION NO.ISSUED DATE EXPIRATION DATE
239086 10/19/2022 11/21/2022

SALESPERSON CUSTOMER SERVICE REP
Bert Coutts
[email protected]
949-535-6382
Bert Coutts
[email protected]
949-535-6382
REQUISITION NO.REQUESTING PARTY CUSTOMER NO.TERMS OFFER CLASS 40mm Launcher Marci Williams C5064 Net 30 LE
F.O.B.SHIP VIA DELIVERY REQ. BY
FTSP Standard Shipping

NOTES & DISCLAIMERS
Thank you for this opportunity to quote. We are pleased to offer requested items below. If you have any questions, need additional information, or would like to place an order, please contact your Customer Service Rep as noted above.

Safety Warning Notice: Products offered, sold, or invoiced herewith may have an applicable Safety Data Sheet (SDS) as prepared by the manufacturer of the product. Any handlers or users of product should refer to applicable SDS prior to handling or utilizing the product. Applicable SDS are included with shipment of products. For other important product notices and warnings, or to request an SDS, please contact Curtis or visit https://www.curtisblueline.com/product-notices-warnings

LN QTY UNIT PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 15 EA 1182330 DEF TECH 1425 Lmt Tactical Single Launcher with Expandable Stock
$1,007.00 $15,105.00
2 1 EA 1013290 DEF TECH 6530 Plastic 40MM Smokeless Powder 250 Shot Round Reloadable Training Kit
$1,158.07 $1,158.07
3 2 EA 1012225 DEF TECH 6325 Sponge Exact Impact 40MM Round $21.88 $43.76

Ph: 562-863-1702
[email protected]
CBL Santa Fe Springs
15523 Carmenita Road
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
www.CurtisBlueLine.com
Quotation No. 239086

LN QTY UNIT PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE Small Business
CAGE Code: 5E720
DUNS Number: 009224163
SIC Code: 5099
Federal Tax ID: 94-1214350
This pricing remains firm until 11/21/2022. Contact us for updated pricing after this date.

Due to market volatility and supply shortages, we recommend contacting your local L.N. Curtis and sons office prior to placing your order to confirm pricing and availability. This excludes our GSA Contract and other Fixed Price Contracts which are governed by contract-specific prices, terms, and conditions.

Subtotal $16,306.83
Estimated Tax Total $1,263.78
Transportation $0.00
Total $17,570.61
View Terms of Sale and Return Policy

QUOTE#

O R D E R

SHIP DATE

Q U O T E
PAGE

SOLD SHIP
TO TO
JOB # ORD. DATE CUST.# LOC. SALESMAN SHIP VIA FRT.

QTY.UOM
ORDER ITEM NO./DESC. UNIT PRICE DISC. NET PRICE

COMMENT
TERMS

621155 1

A.S.A.P.

UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1499 W 13TH STREET 460 N EUCLID AVE
UPLAND CA 91786 UPLAND CA 91786

909-920-6533

NA 10/26/22 002138 A GREGG MCCLUNG FX G-FOB ORIGIN

200 6325 22.50 EA 4,500.00 DEF 40MM SMOKELESS PWDR EXACT .00

IMPACT SPONGE ROUND

1 XFET .00 EA .00 THIS ITEM FET OUT .00

This quote is valid for 45 days from date of issue,
pending credit approval, and is subject to manufacturer's availability and price change. Please call (800) 367-5855 if this bid is still pending on the expiration date for updated pricing.

Standard Terms are Net 30 days. If department policy does not allow for partial shipments and payments, separate
purchase orders for each item will be necessary.

Standard manufacturer's warranty applies to all department

ProForce Law Enforcement agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless its customers from claims for personal
injury or property damages, to the extent arising from the negligent acts or omissions of ProForce Law Enforcement or its employees, agents or independent contractors.

ORDERING INSTRUCTIONS: Please reply to your sales represen- tative in writing to process this order or send an email to [email protected]. For orders over $5,000, a

QUOTE#

O R D E R

SHIP DATE

Q U O T E
PAGE

SOLD SHIP
TO TO
JOB # ORD. DATE CUST.# LOC. SALESMAN SHIP VIA FRT.

QTY.UOM
ORDER ITEM NO./DESC. UNIT PRICE DISC. NET PRICE

COMMENT
TERMS

621155 2

A.S.A.P.

UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1499 W 13TH STREET 460 N EUCLID AVE
UPLAND CA 91786 UPLAND CA 91786

909-920-6533

NA 10/26/22 002138 A GREGG MCCLUNG FX G-FOB ORIGIN

PO or signed quote is required to process the order.

Returned items are subject to 20% restocking fee. All sales are final on non-stocked/special order items
IMPORTANT: To order from this quotation, please sign below.

Printed Name: ____________________________________________ -
Date: ___________________________ P.O.:___________________ -
Signature: _______________________________________________

SALES AMOUNT 4,500.00

FOR: SGT. WILLIAMS

BY: DANNY GONZALES 7.750% SALES TAX 348.75 SUB TOTAL 4,848.75
DUE NET 30 DAYS

QUOTE#

O R D E R

SHIP DATE

Q U O T E
PAGE

SOLD SHIP
TO TO
JOB # ORD. DATE CUST.# LOC. SALESMAN SHIP VIA FRT.

QTY.UOM
ORDER ITEM NO./DESC. UNIT PRICE DISC. NET PRICE

COMMENT
TERMS

621156 1

A.S.A.P.

UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1499 W 13TH STREET 460 N EUCLID AVE
UPLAND CA 91786 UPLAND CA 91786

909-920-6533

NA 10/26/22 002138 A GREGG MCCLUNG FX G-FOB ORIGIN

15 1480 67.27 EA 1,009.05 DEF SOFT CARRYING CASE SINGLE .00

LAUNCHER

This quote is valid for 45 days from date of issue,
pending credit approval, and is subject to manufacturer's availability and price change. Please call (800) 367-5855 if this bid is still pending on the expiration date for updated pricing.

Standard Terms are Net 30 days. If department policy does not allow for partial shipments and payments, separate
purchase orders for each item will be necessary.

Standard manufacturer's warranty applies to all department

ProForce Law Enforcement agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless its customers from claims for personal
injury or property damages, to the extent arising from the negligent acts or omissions of ProForce Law Enforcement or its employees, agents or independent contractors.

ORDERING INSTRUCTIONS: Please reply to your sales represen- tative in writing to process this order or send an email to [email protected]. For orders over $5,000, a PO or signed quote is required to process the order.

Returned items are subject to 20% restocking fee. All sales

QUOTE#

O R D E R

SHIP DATE

Q U O T E
PAGE

SOLD SHIP
TO TO
JOB # ORD. DATE CUST.# LOC. SALESMAN SHIP VIA FRT.

QTY.UOM
ORDER ITEM NO./DESC. UNIT PRICE DISC. NET PRICE

COMMENT
TERMS

621156 2

A.S.A.P.

UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1499 W 13TH STREET 460 N EUCLID AVE
UPLAND CA 91786 UPLAND CA 91786

909-920-6533

NA 10/26/22 002138 A GREGG MCCLUNG FX G-FOB ORIGIN

are final on non-stocked/special order items
IMPORTANT: To order from this quotation, please sign below.

Printed Name: ____________________________________________ -
Date: ___________________________ P.O.:___________________ -
Signature: _______________________________________________

SALES AMOUNT 1,009.05

FOR: SGT WILLIAMS
HANDLING 14.27
BY: DANNY GONZALES FOR R.SCHREIBER 7.750% SALES TAX 79.31 SUB TOTAL 1,102.63
DUE NET 30 DAYS

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.I.

D A T E :N ovem b er 14 , 20 22
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : M A R C E LO B L A N C O, C H I E F O F P O L I C E

C L I F F O R D M A T H E W S, P O L I C E C A P TA I N

M A R C I W I L L I A M S, P O L I C E S E R G E A N T S U B J E C T :L I E N S A L E S E R V I C E A G R E E M E N T E X T E N S I O N

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m en d ed th at th e C i ty C ou ncil d i rec t th e C i ty M an ag er to exercise th e op tion for a second on e year ext ension to th e ag reem en t wi th D enco L ien S ervi ces , I n c. for services related to th e sal e of veh ic les im p oun d ed /stored at th e Poli ce D ep artm ent im p ou nd lot, exten d ing th e ag reem en t throug h O ctob er 3 1, 2 02 3.

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th e p rop osed act ion su p p ort s th e g oal of th e Pol ic e D ep artm ent to rec over cost s associated w ith t he im p ou nd /storag e of veh icles not p i cked u p b y t heir own ers after t he im p ou nd m en t p eriod has end ed .

B A C K G R O U N D
Th e C i ty of U p land Police D ep artm en t m ain tai ns a vehicle im p ou n d l ot at th e rear of th e p olice facility. Th e l ot is for th e s torag e of vehicles im p ou n d ed w h en m ot orist s d rive w it h ou t b ein g p rop erly licen sed . T he Poli ce D ep artm en t p ays for t he towing an d rec overs t h os e c ost s wh en th e veh ic le own er p i cks up t he veh icle. V ehi cl es n ot p i cked up at th e en d of th e im p ou nd m en t p eriod are sent to lien and sold to recover the tow in g /storag e costs.

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
I n A u g u st 20 18 , S taff cont act ed s everal Lien S ale b u s in ess es an d not ified t hem of the Req u est for P rop osal (R F P ) an d p osted the R F P on th e C it y's web site. G ood Faith Lien S ervices, s u b m i tt ed a p rop os al and after C it y C oun cil ap p roval, ent ered into an ag reem en t to

p rovid e lien s ale s ervi ces to th e U p lan d Pol ic e D ep artm en t . T h e term of th e ag reem en t w as th ree years wi th th e op ti on to extend t he ag reem en t t w ice for on e ad d ition al year each tim e.

G ood Faith L ien S ales failed to m eet th e cond ition s of the ag reem en t and the ag reem en t w as term inated .

S taff reac h ed ou t to ot h er l ocal lien sal e servi ce p rovid ers looki n g for a rep l acem en t b ut on ly one, D en co Li en S ales , I nc., was in terest ed at t he t im e. O n O ct ob er 3 1, 2 02 0, t h e C ity entered into an ag reem ent with D en co L ien S ales I nc. to p rovid e lien sale services to the Up lan d Police D ep artm ent. Th e term of th is ag reem ent was for the rem ain in g tim e in the orig inal L ien S al es S ervi ces R F P. Police D ep artm ent p erson nel res p on si b l e for t h e d isp osition of im p ou n d ed veh i cl es w ere con tac ted an d h ave exp erien ced n o p rob lem s w it h th e service p rovid ed b y D enco Li en S al es, I n c. d urin g th e t im e t hey have b een p rovi d i n g t h i s service.

D enco L ien S ales, I nc. ch arg es $6 m ore for sh ort liens th an the p rior com p any.

I n 20 21 , th e C ity C ou nc il d i rec ted the C it y M an ag er to exercise th e first on e year exten sion th rou g h O ctob er 31 , 20 22 .

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
N o ad d ition al ap p rop riation s are req uired at this tim e as this is an ong oin g service that w as alread y b ud g eted for in th e F iscal Year 20 22 /23 op erating b u d g et.

A L T E R N A T I V E S
P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
Denco L ien Sales Inc. Agreement
F irst Extension of Agreement

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.J.

D A T E :N ovem b er 1 4, 2 02 2
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : B R A D E N Y U, P U B L I C W O R K S D I R E C TO R

B O B C R I TC H F I E L D, E N G I N E E R I N G M A N A G E R S U B J E C T :A W A R D O F B I D F O R P R O J E C T N O. 7 00 03 & 70 00 9, C I T Y W I D E S T R I P I N G R E P L A C E M E N T (B I D N O. 2 02 2-0 5)

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m end ed th at th e C it y C ou n ci l ap p rove th e s p ec ifi cat ion s for C i tyw i d e S trip in g P roject N o. 70 00 3 and 7 00 09 ; award th e c on s tru c ti on con tract t o I n t ers tat e S trip in g , I n c. in th e am oun t of $1 75 ,72 1.2 5; and au th ori ze a con st ru ct ion c on t in g en cy in th e am ou n t of $2 6,2 78 .75 , for a total am ou nt of $2 02 ,00 0 from the G as Tax F un d .

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th e p rop osed ac ti on sup p orts t he C i ty's ob ject ive to contin ue to m ai n t ain and i m p rove the C ity's p ub lic road way facilities.

B A C K G R O U N D
O n S ep tem b er 12 , 20 22 , th e C it y rejec ted one b id recei ved for th e S trip ing P rojec t as it w as su b stan tially h ig h er th an t h e E n g i n eer's est im ate. T he C it y su b seq u ent ly revised the contract sp ecifications t o rem ove a slu rry s eal p ortion of work (wh ic h will b e in clud ed as p art of the C ity's an nu al slu rry seal p rog ram in the S p rin g of 2 02 3) an d re-ad vertised th e p roject for b id .

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
Th e C ityw id e S trip in g P roject N ot ice I nvi ti ng B id s (N I B ) w as re-ad verti sed on S ep t em b er 3 0, 20 22 an d O ct ob er 7, 20 22 i n accord an ce w it h the C al iforni a P u b li c C ont ract C od e (S ection 20 16 4) and was also l is ted on th e C it y's w eb site an d d i st ri b u ted to various el ect ron ic p lan room s. O n O ct ob er 1 9, 2 02 2, th e C ity rec eived an d op en ed 6 b id s for t h e P roject , u nd er B id N o. 20 22 -05 , as follows:

B I D D E R B I D A M O U N T
I nterstate S trip ing $1 75 ,72 1.2 5
C A T Trackin g , I nc.$1 97 ,28 3.0 0
S up erior Pavem ent M arkin g s, I n c.$2 55 ,76 5.2 5 W G J E nterp rises, I n c. d b a P C I $2 59 ,92 4.5 0 J & S S trip in g C o., I nc.$3 25 ,78 8.8 5
C hrisp C om p any $4 35 ,47 8.7 5

Th e C ity reviewed th e b i d i n form at ion an d con firm ed th at I n t ers tat e S t ri p i n g , I n c. of Fontana, C alifornia, is t h e low es t res p on si b l e an d res p on si ve b id d er. I f aw ard ed b y th e C ity C oun cil, con stru ction is an ti ci p at ed to b eg in in D ec em b er and b e su b s tan ti all y c om p let e b y Feb ru ary 20 23 , w eath er p erm itting .

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
Th e C i ty's ad op ted F iscal Year 20 22 -23 C ap i tal I m p rovem ent P rog ram (F Y 2 2-2 3 C I P ) b u d g et con tains su ffic ien t fun d s for th e p roject . T he es ti m at ed p roject cos ts an d fu nd in g are su m m arized b elow :

E stimated P ro ject C o sts

B asic B id A m ou nt $1 75 ,72 1.2 5
C on stru ction C on ting ency (~15 %)$26 ,27 8.7 5
T o tal C o ntract W o rk:$202,000.00

C on stru ction A d m inistration and I n sp ection $17 ,00 0.0 0 T o tal Pro ject C o st:$219,000.00

F unding

F Y 22 -23 C I P A ccoun t N o. 2 04 -75 00 -70 00 3 (G as Tax)$1 18 ,00 0.0 0 F Y 22 -23 C I P A ccoun t N o. 2 04 -75 00 -70 00 9 (G as Tax)$1 01 ,00 0.0 0 T o tal Pro ject F unding:$219,000.00

A L T E R N A T I V E S

1. Reject al l b id s an d aut horize th e C it y C lerk to re-ad verti se the C i tywi d e S trip in g P roject.

D ue to a su ccessful b id d in g p rocess, staff d oes not recom m end th is altern ative.

2. P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
Vicinity M ap
Contractor Proposal
Contract for Construction

Project No. 70003 & 70009 Project Map

CITYWIDE SLURRY SEALS 1 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
This Contract for Construction (“Contract”), No. 70003 & 70009 is made and entered into this 14th day of November, 2022 by and between the CITY OF UPLAND, with its principal place of business at 460 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland, California 91786 sometimes hereinafter called the “City” and Interstate Striping, Inc., sometimes hereinafter called “Contractor.” WITNESSETH: That the parties hereto have mutually covenanted and agreed, and by these presents do covenant and agree with each other as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF WORK.

The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated in the Contract, and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in Article 5, below, for the following Project:

Project No. 70003 & 70009
Bid No. 2022-05
Citywide Striping Replacement 2020-21 & 2021-22
Contractor is an independent contractor and not an agent of the City. The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to the City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation.

ARTICLE 2. TIME FOR COMPLETION.

Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work. The Work shall be commenced on the date stated in the City’s Notice to Proceed. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within 40 calendar days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work.

ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT PRICE.

The City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty One Dollars and Twenty Five Cents ($175,721.25). Any work above $175,721.25 up to $202,000 for unforeseen conditions, change orders, etc. is at the City’s sole discretion. Total compensation shall not exceed $202,000.00 without prior approval from the City Council.

Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions. The City will pay to Contractor compensation based upon the prices set forth in the Bid Schedule.

ARTICLE 4. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.

Contractor acknowledges that the City will sustain actual damages for each and every Day completion of the Project is delayed beyond the Contract Time. Because of the nature of the Project, it would be impracticable or extremely difficult to determine the City’s actual damages.

Accordingly, in accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the

CITYWIDE SLURRY SEALS 2 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

Contractor will pay the City the sum of $250.00 for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event this is not paid, the Contractor agrees the City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract. This Section does not exclude recovery of other damages specified in the Contract Documents. Liquidated damages may be deducted from progress payments due Contractor, Project retention or may be collected directly from Contractor, or from Contractor's surety. These provisions for liquidated damages shall not prevent the City, in case of Contractor's default, from terminating the Contractor.

Consistent with Public Contract Code Section 7102, Contractor will be compensated for damages incurred due to delays for which the City is responsible. The parties agree that determining Contractor’s exact delay damages is and will continue to be impracticable and extremely difficult.

As such, for each calendar day in excess of the Contract Time, the City shall pay to the Contractor $250.00 per day as Reverse Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. Such amount shall constitute the only payment allowed for any City caused delays and shall necessarily include all overhead, all profits, all administrative costs, all bond costs, all labor, materials, equipment and rental costs and any other costs, expenses and fees incurred or sustained as a result of such delays. Notice of requests for delay damages and additional days shall be provided to the City within five (5) Days from the discovery of the circumstances giving rise to any delay or three (3) Days from the discovery of any latent or subsurface conditions giving rise to a delay.

ARTICLE 5. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT.

The “Contract Documents” include the following:

Notice Inviting Bids
Instructions to Bidders
Bid Forms
Bid Acknowledgement
Bid Schedule
Bid Guarantee
Designation of Subcontractors
Information Required of Bidders
Non-Collusion Declaration Form
Iran Contracting Act Certification
Public Works Contractor DIR Registration Certification
Performance Bond
Payment (Labor and Materials) Bond
Contract for Construction
General Conditions
Special Conditions
Specifications
Addenda
Construction Plans and Drawing
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction “Greenbook”, 2018 edition Applicable Local Agency Standards and Specifications, as last revised Reference Specifications
Approved and fully executed Change Orders
Permits
Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract

CITYWIDE SLURRY SEALS 3 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

The Contractor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents.

All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. In the event of conflict, the various Contract Documents will be given effect in the order set forth in the General Conditions. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties.

ARTICLE 6. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW AND CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE.

Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to this Work.

ARTICLE 7. INDEMNIFICATION.

Contractor shall provide indemnification and defense as set forth in the General Conditions.

ARTICLE 8. PREVAILING WAGES.

Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at the City’s Office or may be obtained online at http://www.dir.ca.gov and which must be posted at the job site.

ARTICLE 9. FALSE CLAIMS.

Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is submitted to the City, it may be considered fraud and Contractor may be subject to criminal prosecution. Contractor acknowledges that the False Claims Act, California Government Code sections 12650, et seq., provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false claim to a public entity. These provisions include within their scope false claims made with deliberate ignorance of the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. In the event the City seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its litigation costs, including attorneys’ fees. Contractor hereby acknowledges that the filing of a false claim may the Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding wherein Contractor may be prevented from further bidding on public contracts for a period of up to five (5) years. [REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

CITYWIDE SLURRY SEALS 4 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written.

CITY OF UPLAND

By:

Bill Velto, Mayor

ATTEST:

By:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

NAME OF CONTRACTOR

[IF CORPORATION, TWO SIGNATURES,

PRESENT OR VICE PRESIDENT AND
SECRETARY OR TREASURER REQUIRED]
By:

Its:

Printed
Name:

[SECOND SIGNATURE LINE IF
APPLICABLE]

By:

Its:

Printed
Name:

____________________________________
Contractor’s License Number and
Classification

____________________________________
DIR Registration Number

(CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURE MUST BE

NOTARIZED AND CORPORATE

SEAL AFFIXED, IF APPLICABLE)

CITYWIDE SLURRY SEALS 5 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

END OF CONTRACT

Notary Acknowledgment
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ______________
On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally

appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory

evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public

OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual
Corporate Officer

Title(s) Title or Type of Document
Partner(s) Limited
General Number of Pages
Attorney-In-Fact
Trustee(s)
Guardian/Conservator Date of Document
Other:

Signer is representing:

Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies)

Signer(s) Other Than Named Above

CITYWIDE SLURRY SEALS 6 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

S T A F F R E P O R T
I T E M N O . 10.K .

D A T E :N ovem b er 14 , 20 22
T O :M A YO R A N D C I T Y C O U N C I L
F R O M : M I C H A E L B L A Y, C I T Y M A N A G E R P R E P A R E D B Y : B R A D E N Y U, P U B L I C W O R K S D I R E C TO R

A L A N F R E N C H , P R I N C I PA L E N G I N E E R S U B J E C T :F I N A L D R A F T O F T H E LO C A L R O A D S A F E T Y P L A N

R E C O M M E N D E D A C T I O N
I t is recom m en d ed that th e C it y C oun cil ap p rove, recei ve, an d fi le th e Local Road S afety P lan (L R S P ).

G O A L S T A T E M E N T
Th is sup p orts t h e C i ty's g oal of p rovi d i n g h ig h -q u al it y cost-effective servi ces b y ensurin g facilities are p rop erly m ain tained .

B A C K G R O U N D
Th e L ocal Road S afet y P lan (L R S P ) p rovid es a fram ew ork for i d en ti fyin g , anal yzi ng , an d p rioritizin g road way s afety i m p rovem en t s on local road s. T h e L R S P will p rovid e a li st of need ed p rojects and p riorities to b rin g existing road s an d in tersections into conform an ce w ith th e C alifornia M an ual of U n iform Traffi c C on t rol D evic es, C alt ran s, an d t h e C it y's stan d ard req uirem ents.

S ince th e C i ty m u st have a L R S P or an eq u ivalent p lan (s u c h as System ic S afet y A nalysis Rep ort [S S A R ] or V is ion Z ero A ct ion P l an ) i n ord er to ap p ly for H S I P fun d s, th e P u b lic Works D ep artm ent’s Lan d D evelop m en t and Traffic S ect ion will u s e t he L R S P t o id en tify an d p rioritize p rojects, ap p ly for g ran t fu nd in g , an d track p rog ress.

I n J u l y 20 21 , C ity st aff ret ain ed K O A C orp orat ion , I n c. (KO A ) t o p rep are a fu nd in g ap p lication for a g ran t an d in A u g u s t 2 02 1, th e C it y received n otification th at fu nd in g w as ap p roved for th e p rep arati on of t he L R S P. A fter g oin g t h rou g h th e p ub lic b id p roc ess , C it y C oun cil

ap p roved an ag reem ent with K O A t o p rep are a Local Road S afety P lan on Feb ru ary 14 , 2 02 2 for $65 ,00 0.

I S S U E S /A N A L Y S I S
Th e m i ss ion of t h i s L R S P i s to ac h i eve a red uction i n collisions, an d in p art ic u l ar, fatal an d seriou s inju ry collision s throug h an ap p roach that utilizes ed ucation, en forcem en t, en g ineerin g and em erg en cy service strateg ies.

K O A h as com p l eted the L R S P. S taff p res en t ed th e final L R S P to th e P u b l ic W orks C om m ittee at t he O c tob er 11 , 20 22 m eet in g , w hich th e C om m ittee recei ved an d file. S t aff is recom m end in g that th e C ity C oun cil ap p rove, receive an d file the finalized L S R P.

F I S C A L I M P A C T S
Th ere is n o fis cal im p ac t t o the G en eral F u nd w it h t h e ap p roval of th e L R S P an d t h e ad op tion of a resolu tion ap p rovin g the d ocu m en t.

A L T E R N A T I V E S
P rovid e altern ative d irection to staff.

AT TAC HM E NT S :

Description
L ocal Road S afety P lan

City of Upland

LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN

SEPTEMBER 2022

Prepared for:

City of Upland

Prepared By:

KOA Corporation

5095 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 330, San Diego, CA 92123. Ph: (858) 300-8960

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 OVERVIEW OF UPLAND ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1

1.3 LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN PROCESS ............................................................................................................................................................ 2

1.4 SAFETY STAKEHOLDERS ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3

1.5 PROJECT MISSION AND GOALS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3

2.0 METHODOLOGY 5

2.1 COLLISION DATA SOURCES ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.1.1 SWITRS ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.1.2 TIMS ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.1.3 OTS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.2 IDENTIFYING LOCATIONS FOR ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES .............................................................................................. 5

2.2.1 RANKING FUNCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6

2.2.2 AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6

2.2.3 CRASH RATE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6

2.2.4 EDPO SCORE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7

2.3 PROPOSING ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES ................................................................................................................................... 7

3.0 COLLISION ANALYSIS 8

3.1 CITYWIDE COLLISION DATA ............................................................................................................................................................................... 8

3.1.1 CRASHES BY YEAR AND SEVERITY ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8

3.1.2 CRASH BY TIME OF DAY AND DAY OF WEEK ........................................................................................................................................................... 9

3.1.3 CRASH TYPE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10

3.1.4 CRASH CAUSES ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11

3.1.5 CRASH INVOLVED WITH ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 12

3.1.6 LIGHTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 13

3.1.7 PEDESTRIAN CRASHES .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 13

3.1.8 BICYCLE CRASH CAUSE ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14

3.1.9 AT-FAULT PARTIES ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15

3.2 COMPARISON WITH CITIES OF SIMILAR SIZE ........................................................................................................................................... 15

3.3 FOCUSED CRASH NETWORK ............................................................................................................................................................................ 16

3.3.1 INTERSECTIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16

3.3.2 MIDBLOCK ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17

3.3.3 SEGMENT ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

3.4 SAFETY EMPHASIS AREAS ................................................................................................................................................................................. 18

3.4.1 INTERSECTION SAFETY .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

3.4.2 SPEED MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

3.4.3 ROADSIDE SAFETY ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20

3.4.4 BICYCLE SAFETY ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21

3.4.5 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 22

3.4.6 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE ......................................................................................................................................................................... 23

3.4.7 DISTRACTED DRIVING ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP ii

4.0 SAFETY TOOLBOX 31

4.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31

4.2 ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES ................................................................................................................................................................................ 31

4.2.1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ................................................................................................................................................................................. 32

4.2.2 NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION COUNTERMEASURES ....................................................................................................................................... 34

4.3 EDUCATION COUNTERMEASURES .................................................................................................................................................................................... 35

4.4 ENFORCEMENT COUNTERMEASURES .............................................................................................................................................................................. 36

4.5 EMERGENCY SERVICE COUNTERMEASURES .................................................................................................................................................................. 37

4.6 OTHER PROGRAMS ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37

5.0 PRIORITY PROJECTS 39

5.1 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

5.2 CITYWIDE SIGNAL HARDWARE UPGRADES .................................................................................................................................................................... 39

5.3 CITYWIDE SIGNAL TIMING IMPROVEMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................. 43

5.4 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - ADD SIGNAL ............................................................................................................................................................. 45

5.5 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 48

5.6 OTHER PROJECTS / PROGRAMS ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 51

5.7 FUNDING SOURCES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 52

6.0 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) EVALUATION 55

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1-1 VICINITY MAP ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 FIGURE 3-1 COLLISION SEVERITY ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 FIGURE 3-2 COLLISION BY TIME OF DAY .................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 FIGURE 3-3 COLLISION BY DAY OF WEEK ................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 FIGURE 3-4 COLLISION TYPE ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 FIGURE 3-5 CAUSE OF CRASH .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 FIGURE 3-6 HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS (BY EPDO COST) .................................................................................................................................................... 24 FIGURE 3-7 SEGMENT COLLISIONS .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 FIGURE 3-8 BROADSIDE COLLISIONS ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 FIGURE 3-9 REAR END COLLISIONS ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 FIGURE 3-10 HIT OBJECT COLLISIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 FIGURE 3-11 BICYCLE COLLISIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 FIGURE 3-12 PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS .................................................................................................................................................................................. 30 FIGURE 5-1 SIGNAL UPGRADE LOCATIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 40 FIGURE 5-2 SIGNAL CONCEPT .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 FIGURE 5-3 EXAMPLE IMPROVEMENT CONCEPT (13TH STREET AND EUCLID AVENUE) .......................................................................................... 49

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1-1 PROJECT VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 TABLE 3-1 CRASHES BY YEAR AND SEVERITY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 TABLE 3-2 COLLISION TYPE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 TABLE 3-3 CAUSE OF CRASH ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 TABLE 3-4 TOTAL CRASHES INVOLVED WITH ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 TABLE 3-5 FATAL AND SEVERE INJURY CRASHES INVOLVED ........................................................................................................................................... 13 TABLE 3-6 CRASH BY LIGHTING CONDITION ......................................................................................................................................................................... 13 TABLE 3-7 PEDESTRIAN CRASHES .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 TABLE 3-8 BICYCLE CRASHES ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 TABLE 3-9 AGE OF AT-FAULT PARTY ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 TABLE 3-10 OTS RANKINGS (2019) ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 TABLE 3-11 INTERSECTION COLLISION LOCATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 TABLE 3-12 MIDBLOCK COLLISION LOCATIONS BY SEVERITY ........................................................................................................................................ 17

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP iii

TABLE 3-13 SEGMENT COLLISION RATES (ALL COLLISIONS) ........................................................................................................................................... 18 TABLE 3-14 FREQUENT BROADSIDE COLLISIONS ................................................................................................................................................................ 19 TABLE 3-15 FREQUENT REAR END COLLISIONS ................................................................................................................................................................... 20 TABLE 3-16 FREQUENT HIT OBJECT COLLISIONS ................................................................................................................................................................. 21 TABLE 3-17 FREQUENT BICYCLE COLLISIONS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 22 TABLE 3-18 FREQUENT PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 TABLE 4-1 ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES ................................................................................................................................................................... 32 TABLE 5-1 COUNTERMEASURES S02 S17PB SIGNAL HARDWARE UPGRADES ........................................................................................................... 41 TABLE 5-2 S02 S17PB COUNTERMEASURE COLLISIONS ................................................................................................................................................... 42 TABLE 5-3 S02 S17PB CONSTRUCTION ITEMS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 42 TABLE 5-4 S02 S17PB PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS ..................................................................................................................................................... 43 TABLE 5-5 S02 S17PB BENEFIT - COST ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 TABLE 5-6 S03 COUNTERMEASURE COLLISIONS ................................................................................................................................................................. 44 TABLE 5-7 S03 CONSTRUCTION ITEMS ................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 TABLE 5-8 S03 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS .................................................................................................................................................................. 45 TABLE 5-9 S03 BENEFIT - COST .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 45 TABLE 5-10 NS03 COUNTERMEASURE COLLISIONS ........................................................................................................................................................... 46 TABLE 5-11 NS03 CONSTRUCTION ITEMS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 47 TABLE 5-12 NS03 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS ............................................................................................................................................................ 47 TABLE 5-13 NS03 BENEFIT - COST ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 TABLE 5-14 NS06 NS08 COUNTERMEASURE COLLISIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 50 TABLE 5-15 NS06 NS08 CONSTRUCTION ITEMS .................................................................................................................................................................. 50 TABLE 5-16 NS06 NS08 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS ................................................................................................................................................. 51 TABLE 5-17 NS06 NS08 BENEFIT - COST ................................................................................................................................................................................. 51 TABLE 5-18 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY FUNDING SOURCES SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 53

APPENDIX
APPENDIX A: Stakeholder Summary
APPENDIX B: Total Collisions by Intersection
APPENDIX C: Total Collisions by Midblock
APPENDIX D: Total Collisions by Segment
APPENDIX E: Caltrans Countermeasure List

List of Abbreviations
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ATP Active Transportation Program
ADT Average Daily Traffic
B/C; BCR Benefit Cost Ratio
Caltrans California Department of Transportation (Division of Local Assistance) CA-MUTCD (California - Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices)
CM Countermeasure
CMF Crash Modification Factor
CRF Crash Reduction Factor
“5 E’s of Safety” Education, Enforcement, Engineering, Emergency Response and Emerging Technologies
EMS Emergency Medical Services
EPDO Equivalent Property Damage Only
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
HCCL High Crash Concentration Location

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP iv

HR3 High Risk Rural Roads Program
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HSM Highway Safety Manual
LRSP Local Roadway Safety Manual
LRSM Caltrans Local Roadway Safety, a Manual for California’s Local Road Owners OTS Office of Traffic Safety (California)
PDO Property Damage Only
RSA Roadway Safety Audit
SafeTREC Safe Transportation Research and Education Center (SafeTREC) at the University of California, Berkeley
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping System (a product of SafeTREC)

REPORTS DISCOVERY AND ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN REPORTS, SURVEYS, AND INFORMATION – Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code [23 U.S.C. §148(h) (4)], shall not be subject for discovery or admitted into evidence in a Fede ral or State court proceeding or considered for other purposed in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or address in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data Consideration of implementing the countermea sures identified in this report is contingent upon but is not limited to securing the necessary right-of-way for the traffic safety enhancement and securing funding and resources to finance all project phases, including design, construction, on -going maintenance, environmental analysis, and community engagement

INTRODUCTION

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) established the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) in 2019 to provide funding for local agencies to identify safety needs and recommend projects to address these needs. The LRSP program evolved from the state-funded Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP) established in 2016. Both of these programs were developed to enable identification of safety needs at the local level in support of the California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). The LRSP provides an opportunity to evaluate roadway safety problems through data analysis and improve roadway safety through investments in the four E’s of traffic safety – Engineering, Enforcement, Education, and Emergency Response. The process of preparing a LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze safety problems and recommend safety improvements.

Upland was selected as one of 250 local agencies in California (as of April 12, 2021) to receive Caltrans funding to develop a Local Road Safety Plan. Development of the Upland LRSP will enable the City to meet the eligibility requirements for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding, which Caltrans will require for all future HSIP cycles.

1.2 OVERVIEW OF UPLAND

Upland is located at the base of the San Bernardino Mountains in San Bernardino County, 35 miles east of Los Angeles and 20 miles west of San Bernardino. Upland is a mid-sized city with a population of 78,769 in 2019. Figure 1-1 shows the location of Upland in a regional context. The Interstate 10 (I-10) freeway corridor is located along the south boundary. Interstate 210 (I-210), or the Foothill Freeway, originates in Upland, traverses the northt part of the city, and heads west towards Pasadena and east toward San Bernardino.

Euclid Avenue is part of State Route 83, a north–south route that connects to Ontario and Chino to the south. Foothill Boulevard is part of State Route 66, an east–west route that was formerly part of U.S. Route

66. Bus service in Upland is provided by Omnitrans. Upland is also served by the Metrolink commuter rail system on the San Bernardino Line. The City encompasses 15.6 square miles, includes 209 centerline miles of public streets and maintains over 80 signalized intersections.

INTRODUCTION

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 2

Figure 1-1 Vicinity Map

1.3 LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN PROCESS

The Upland LRSP follows a six-step process developed
by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
used by Caltrans to guide the development and review
of LRSPs. The six steps include:

1. Establish Leadership
a. Develop a stakeholder working group
b. Develop a Vision and Goals Source: safety.fhway.doc/provencountermeasures

2. Analyze Safety Data
a. Gather data
b. Complete crash data analysis

3. Determine Emphasis Areas
a. Define emphasis areas
b. Identify priority locations based on crash data analysis

INTRODUCTION

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 3

4. Identify Strategies
a. Identify safety countermeasures that address emphasis areas and high priority locations

5. Prioritize and Implement Strategies
a. Apply countermeasures and strategies to develop safety projects b. Evaluate safety projects
c. Develop implementation strategies

6. Evaluate and Update
a. Describe the process to update safety data in order to determine success of countermeasures
b. Describe the process to review countermeasures to determine if additional efforts are needed

1.4 SAFETY STAKEHOLDERS
Local safety partners representing the 4E’s of traffic safety were engaged to collaboratively address roadway safety in Upland. Participants included representatives from:

 Upland Police Department
 Upland Fire Department
 OmniTrans
 Upland Unified School District
 Local public and safety advocacy groups
 Community members
 Traffic and Parking Commission

Stakeholder meetings were held on May 26, 2022 and August 22, 2022. Summaries from these meetings are provided in Appendix A.

1.5 PROJECT MISSION AND GOALS
The Upland LRSP is guided by the vision that improvements to traffic safety can be achieved by addressing locations identified by crash patterns with proven engineering countermeasures and through traffic safety education and enforcement. The mission of this LRSP is to achieve a reduction in collisions, and in particular, in fatal and serious injury collisions through a multi-agency approach that utilizes education, enforcement, engineering and emergency service strategies. The LRSP vision, mission and goals are listed in Table 1-1.

INTRODUCTION

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 4

Table 1-1 Project Vision, Mission and Goals

Vision
Achieve traffic safety improvements by addressing
locations identified by crash patterns with proven
engineering countermeasures and through traffic safety
education and enforcement.

Mission
Achieve a reduction in collisions through a multi-agency approach that utilizes education, enforcement,
engineering and emergency service strategies.

Goals
• Save lives and prevent serious injuries on local roads and streets
• Reduce the severity of collisions through reduction in travel speed, driving under the influence, and improper turning
• Provide needed infrastructure to address higher collision locations
• Improving safety in school zones
• Improving driver awareness of speeding, texting, and
drinking while driving

METHODOLOGY

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 5

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 COLLISION DATA SOURCES
The collision data was drawn from three sources. The collision trend data was derived between 2015 and 2019 from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database.

The University of California Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) provided comparative information on crash history in Upland. The California Office of Traffic Safety Rankings (OTS) contributed comparative collision data for the year 2019 for Upland and cities in California with a similar population.

2.1.1 SWITRS
The California Highway Patrol’s SWITRS database contains data on statewide collisions. The SWITRS application provides geographically- and temporally-targeted collision reports in an electronic format. KOA used SWITRS to evaluate data on Upland collisions between 2015 and 2019 both in aggregate and classified by control type (signalized, non-signalized, and midblock locations).

2.1.2 TIMS
The TIMS database contains geocoded collisions included in the SWITRS database. TIMS geocodes SWITRS collisions that involve either an injury or fatality (i.e., excluding property damage-only collisions). Thus, TIMS provides local agencies with an efficient and straightforward tool to conduct geographic analysis. KOA utilized TIMS data to identify prominent transportation safety issues in the City.

2.1.3 OTS
The OTS rankings compare traffic safety statistics among cities in the state of California with similar populations. The statistics focus on the victims killed and injured in crashes. Cities can use these comparisons to see the areas in which they underperform. The OTS collision ranking system compares cities of similar population sizes. Upland belongs to the OTS Group C, which contains 105 California cities with a population between 50,001 and 100,000.

2.2 IDENTIFYING LOCATIONS FOR ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES Crash data analysis for this LRSP was conducted using collision data from the SWITRS collision database.

The collision records include a variety of information about each collision, including the location, date, time of the day, crash type, crash severity, primary violation category, transportation mode of the involved parties, and movement of the involved parties prior to the collision. Per California state law, motor vehicle collisions must be reported when vehicle or property damage exceeds $1,000, or when any of the parties suffer an injury or fatality. Collisions with no injured parties or little property damage might not be reported and, therefore, are not included in the collision database.

Caltrans’ Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners, Version 1.6, April 2022 (LRSM) encourages a pro-active rather than reactive approach to safety issue identification. Traditionally, agencies using a reactive approach have located and implemented safety projects solely based on recent crashes, specific crash concentrations, or safety issues raised by stakeholders.

METHODOLOGY

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 6

A pro-active approach is preferred, according to the LRSM, because with traditional methods, “crash concentrations and crash trends may be missed if local agencies rely exclusively on these identifiers for their roadway safety effort.” A pro-active approach would identify safety improvements by analyzing the safety of the entire roadway network. For this document, the process for identifying candidate locations for safety improvements considers any one of the following three factors:
● An extensive crash history at high-collision frequency locations providing insight into which roadway characteristics are associated with certain types of crashes ● Professional engineering judgment regarding the availability of feasible engineering countermeasures to fix the safety issues
● Applicability of the engineering countermeasures at other locations with roadway characteristics associated with similar types of crashes regardless of their crash history The LRSM guidelines require analyzing at least three to five years of the most recent crash data. Five years of crash data usage adheres to the maximum threshold permitted by the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) for a safety infrastructure project application for federal funding.

2.2.1 Ranking Function
A candidate intersection or roadway segment for safety improvements does not necessarily need to demonstrate a history of high or severe collisions to be considered for further evaluation. However, locations with high numbers of collisions are often good starting points for safety analysis due to the rich information provided by the collision history. Three ranking methods were utilized to identify high collision frequency intersections and roadway segments: Average Crash Frequency, Crash Rate, and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scores. A brief description of each of the methods is provided in the following sections.

2.2.2 Average Crash Frequency
Average Crash Frequency is the most basic method for assessing collision incidence. The analysis tallies the numbers of collisions at each location in the roadway network over the five year period, both in aggregate and by a category of interest (e.g. level of severity, collision type, and others). The analysis then ranks intersections or roadway segments based on the collisions’ frequency.

2.2.3 Crash Rate
The Crash Rate method goes a step beyond average crash frequency, normalizing facilities’ crash frequency by the volume of vehicle traffic or travel. This method divides the number of collisions (or collisions in a particular category) by the quantity of Million Enterin g Vehicles (for intersections) or 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (for roadway segments). While the Crash Rate method accounts for differences in facilities’ length and traffic volume, it may instead unduly favor low-volume and low-collision roadways where countermeasures produce lower net benefit for travelers.

METHODOLOGY

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 7

2.2.4 EPDO Scores
Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scores assign weighting factors to crashes by severity relative to property damage only (PDO) collisions. The weight generally reflects an order of magnitude difference between the cost of fatal/severe injury crashes and non-severe injury collisions. The weights by crash severity come from the 202 2 LRSM.
● Fatal and Severe Injury at signalized intersections – $1,787,000 ● Fatal and Severe Injury at non-signalized intersections – $2,843,000 ● Fatal and Severe Injury at Roadway – $2,461,000
● Other Visible Injury – $159,900
● Compliant of Pain – $90,900
● PDO – $14,900

2.3 PROPOSING ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES
After ranking the intersections and roadway segments, the following steps were used to propose engineering countermeasures:
● Reviewed crash details (party involved, movement before the crash, primary collision factor, violation code, time of the day, and others) at high-risk locations ● Obtained detailed police reports from the City and reviewed for all the fatal and severe injury collisions
● Reviewed field conditions through physical site visits. ● Assessed the nature of prevalent crash types with respect to the intersection’s control type, geometrical features, and signal phasing/timing
● Reviewed current conditions and recent historical conditions via Google Map Street View, whenever necessary, to check whether any geometry, signal, or signage changes have been made in the past few years
● Evaluated and screened countermeasures from the LRSM or Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse ( http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/) , a searchable database that can be easily queried to identify CMFs and Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs)

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 8

3.0 COLLISION ANALYSIS

3.1 CITYWIDE COLLISION DATA
An analysis of city-wide collision trends was completed using five years of collision data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019. A five-year analysis period is consistent with the HSIP guidelines and includes the most recent data available. The University of California Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) provided comparative information on collisions in Upland and San Bernardino County. During this period a total of 1,945 crashes were reported in the city along local roadways.

3.1.1 Crashes by Year and Severity
Collisions are classified by the severity to the involved parties. Severity categories include collisions with a fatality, severe injury, visible (but not severe) injury, complaint of pain injury, and property damage only (collision resulted in only damage to the vehicle or other property). While the focus of the LRSP is on injury and fatal collisions, it should be noted that the number of property damage only collisions is underreported in Upland, which affects the percentages by severity. For the five-year analysis period, the number of crashes by severity are listed by year in Table 3-1, including the averages over the analysis period. Crash severity for the five-year period is illustrated in Figure 3-1. The highest number of collisions occurred in 2016 but decreased the following three years. Three percent of the total collisions involve either a fatality or severe injury.

Table 3-1 Crashes by Year and Severity
Note: The percentage of fatal injury collisions are higher due to the fact that many property damage only collisions were not reported Figure 3-1 Collision Severity

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Fatal 2 2 6 3 1 14 3 1%
Severe Injury 8 11 9 10 2 40 8 2%
Visible Injury 143 144 104 81 69 541 108 28%
Complaint of Pain 249 279 235 183 138 1084 217 56%
Property Damage Only 58 74 49 52 33 266 53 14%
Total Collisions 460 510 403 329 243 1945 -100%
YearCollision Severity Total Average Percent

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 9

3.1.2 Crash by Time of Day and Day of Week

Figure 3-2 provides a summation of collisions by time of day and Figure 3-3 by day of the week. The percentage of total collisions has been highest during the p.m. commuter peak period between 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. More collisions have occurred on Friday than on any other day.

Figure 3-2 Crash by Time of Day

Figure 3-3 Crash by Day of Week

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 10

3.1.3 Crash Type

Table 3-2 and Figure 3-4 describe the total collisions by collision type for each year and for the five-year period. The broadside crash pattern was the most common collision type for all the collisions at (41%).

Broadside crashes often occur at intersections or driveways because of drivers failing to yield or obey stop-controls, or where a gap in traffic is misjudged where a turning vehicle collides with a vehicle traveling through the intersection. Rear end crashes accounted for (29%) of the collisions and often occur where traffic speeds change such as near signalized intersections where a driver does not react in time to a change of traffic signal, or where vehicles slow to turn into driveways. Hit-object crashes included vehicle collisions with parked cars, poles or other objects within or outside the roadway, and accounted for (13%) of the total collisions.

Table 3-2 Collision Type

Figure 3-4 Collision Type

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Broadside 201 224 160 129 91 805 161 41%
Rear End 138 146 116 89 84 573 115 29%
Hit Object 65 79 42 30 28 244 49 13%
Sideswipe 27 24 24 36 15 126 25 6%
Head-On 5 13 23 23 13 77 15 4%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 12 19 26 14 4 75 15 4%
Other 10 2 9 3 6 30 6 2%
Overturned 2 3 3 4 2 14 3 1%
Not Stated 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0%
Total Collisions 460 510 403 329 243 1945 -100%
Collision Type Year Total Average Percent

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 11

3.1.4 Crash Causes

The causes of collisions are listed in Table 3-3 and shown in Figure 3-5. The most frequent cause of collisions has been unsafe speed (27%), followed by automobile right of way violation (23%), traffic signals and signs (13%), and improper turning (13%). Unsafe speed crashes often occur at intersections and are a result of vehicle speeding caused by higher speeds on downhill grades, not slowing resulting from changing conditions, or from disobeying posted speed limits. Auto right of way violations occur when vehicles fail to yield the right-of-way when required. Traffic signal and sign violations are a result of motorists failing to see or observe these traffic control devices.

Table 3-3 Cause of Crash

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Unsafe Speed 128 141 105 75 74 523 105 27%
Automobile Right of Way 99 130 97 66 56 448 90 23%
Traffic Signals and Signs 66 69 48 43 27 253 51 13%
Improper Turning 51 58 47 56 36 248 50 13%
Driving or Bicycling Under
the Influence of Alcohol or
Drug 36 42 35 23 17 153 31 8%
Unknown 19 19 17 18 9 82 16 4%
Unsafe Starting or Backing 14 11 3 8 4 40 8 2%
Wrong Side of Road 7 7 7 12 4 37 7 2%
Pedestrian Violation 6 7 9 8 3 33 7 2%
Pedestrian Right of Way 3 7 10 5 1 26 5 1%
Other Than Driver (or
Pedestrian)7 3 8 3 4 25 5 1%
Other Hazardous Violation 6 4 7 5 2 24 5 1%
Other Improper Driving 9 4 3 2 2 20 4 1%
Unsafe Lane Change 5 4 3 3 4 19 4 1%
Other 4 4 4 2 0 14 3 1%
Total Collisions 460 510 403 329 243 1945 -100%
Collision Cause Year Total Average Percent

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 12

Figure 3-5 Cause of Crash

3.1.5 Crash Involved With
Table 3-4 summarizes what type of object was involved with each crash. Most crashes involved a collision with another motor vehicle (69%). Four percent of the crashes involved collisions with pedestrians and five percent of the crashes involved collisions with bicycles.

Table 3-4 Total Crashes Involved With

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Other Motor Vehicle 317 345 275 222 184 1343 269 69%
Fixed Object 63 75 41 32 28 239 48 12%
Parked Motor Vehicle 33 35 22 26 16 132 26 7%
Bicycle 23 26 27 19 7 102 20 5%
Pedestrian 13 19 26 15 4 77 15 4%
Motor Vehicle on Other
Roadway 4 1 5 9 1 20 4 1%
Non-Collision 4 1 3 2 10 2 1%
Other Object 3 8 7 2 1 21 4 1%
Not Stated 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0%
Total Collisions 460 510 403 329 243 1945 -100%
Crash Involved With Year Total Average Percent

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 13

Table 3-5 shows the type of object that was involved in the collision for fatal and severe crashes. Most of the severe injury crashes involved either another motor vehicle (42%), fixed objects (29%), or a pedestrian (15%).

Table 3-5 Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes Involved

3.1.6 Lighting Conditions
Table 3-6 shows that approximately one third of the collisions occurred at night. Only five percent of the collisions occurred on unlit streets.

Table 3-6 Crash by Lighting Condition

3.1.7 Pedestrian Crashes
Table 3-7 shows pedestrian actions for crashes involving pedestrians. The percent of pedestrian collisions that occurred within a crosswalk at an intersection or midblock was quite high (51%). Most of the remaining collisions occurred outside crosswalks with pedestrians crossing the street or walking along the road.

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Other Motor Vehicle 5 5 5 3 18 4 33%
Fixed Object 2 2 4 4 1 13 3 24%
Pedestrian 1 5 3 2 1 12 2 22%
Bicycle 1 1 4 1 7 1 13%
Parked Motor Vehicle 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2%
Motor Vehicle on Other
Roadway 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2%
Non-Collision 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2%
Other Object 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2%
Total KSI Collisions 10 13 15 13 3 54 -100%
KSI Crash Involved With Year Total Average Percent
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Daylight 331 352 279 232 167 1361 272 70%
Dark - Street Lights 113 142 108 86 64 513 103 26%
Dusk - Dawn 11 6 12 6 6 41 8 2%
Dark - No Street Lights 4 9 4 3 5 25 5 1%
Dark - Street Lights Not Functioning1 1 0 1 1 4 1 0%
Not Stated 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0%
Total Collisions 460 510 403 329 243 1945 -100%
Lighting Year Total Average Percent

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 14

Table 3-7 Pedestrian Crashes
Pedestrian Action Count Percent
Crossing in Crosswalk at
Intersection 36 44%
Crossing Not in Crosswalk 29 36%
In Road, Including Shoulder 8 10%
Not Stated 4 5%
Not in Road 3 4%
Crossing in Crosswalk Not at
Intersection 1 1%
Total Pedestrian Collisions 81 100%

3.1.8 Bicycle Crash Cause
Table 3-8 lists bicycle crashes by cause. Twenty-two percent of the bicycle crashes occurred in automobile right-of-way or when sharing the street with vehicles. Eighteen percent of the bicycle crashes occurred on the wrong side of the road either by the vehicle or bicycle. Fifteen and fourteen percent of the bicycle crashes occurred at unsafe speeds or when either the vehicle or the bicycle did not correctly adhere to traffic signals or stop signs.

Table 3-8 Bicycle Crashes
Bicycle Action Count Percent
Automobile Right of Way 27 22%
Wrong Side of Road 22 18%
Unsafe Speed 18 15%
Traffic Signals and Signs 17 14%
Improper Turning 12 10%
Unknown 10 8%
Other Hazardous Violation 8 7%
Other Improper Driving 2 2%
Other Than Driver (or Pedestrian) 2 2%
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug 1 1%
Lights 1 1%
Pedestrian Right of Way 1 1%
Pedestrian Violation 1 1%
Unsafe Starting or Backing 1 1%
Total Bicycle Collisions 123 100%

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 15

3.1.9 At-Fault Parties
Information was collected about the parties causing the collision (at-fault party) and the people that were involved in the accident (not at fault). As shown in Table 3-9, younger drivers (under 25 years) accounted for 23% of the collisions. Older drivers (65+) accounted for 12% of the collisions.

Table 3-9 Age of At-Fault Party

3.2 COMPARISON WITH CITIES OF SIMILAR SIZE
Upland falls under Group C in the OTS Crash Ranking system. Group C consists of 105 cities in the state of California with a population between 50,000 and 100,000. Table 3-10 shows the City’s crash ranking among these cities, where 1 being the highest or worst and 105 being the lowest or best. This data is for the most recent year that data was available, which is 2019. The City’s traffic safety performance ranked below the 50th percentile in one speed-related crash type category shown below:
 The City ranked 27th for speed related collisions

For other categories, the City ranked above the 50th percentile:

 The City ranked 62th for total collision fatalities and injuries  The City ranked 79th for injury and fatality collisions with alcohol involved o Ranked 95th for injury and fatality collisions with alcohol involved age 21 or lower o Ranked 85nd for injury and fatality collisions with alcohol involved age 21-34  The City ranked 102nd for injury or fatality collisions involving pedestrians o The City ranked 104th for killed or injured pedestrians less than 15 years of age 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Under 15 1 6 5 1 1 14 0%
15-19 57 50 33 41 25 206 10%
20-24 80 73 51 42 31 277 13%
25-29 49 70 39 38 26 222 11%
30-34 36 42 32 25 24 159 10%
35-39 18 34 36 30 23 141 9%
40-44 29 24 22 17 9 101 4%
45-49 26 23 26 19 12 106 5%
50-54 25 33 24 9 11 102 5%
55-59 16 25 17 15 11 84 5%
60-64 16 14 21 8 11 70 5%
65-69 12 22 20 10 7 71 3%
70-74 10 13 12 6 7 48 3%
75-79 13 8 11 14 9 55 4%
80 and Older 16 15 13 13 6 63 2%
Unknown 56 58 41 41 29 225 12%
Total Collisions 460 510 403 329 243 1945 100%
Collision At-Fault Year Total Percent

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 16

o The City ranked 104th for killed or injured pedestrians over 65 years of age  The City ranked 92nd for injury or fatality collisions involving bicyclists o The City ranked 53rd for killed or injured bicyclists less than 15 years of age  The City ranked 67th for nighttime (the period between 9:00 pm and 3:00 am) injury and fatality collisions
 The composite ranking is an aggregate of several rankings (drinking age 21-34, drinking under age 21, alcohol involved, hit and run). For this measure, the City ranked 78th out of the 105 cities compared.

Table 3-10 OTS Rankings (2019)

Type Of Crash
Victims
Killed or
Injured
OTS
Ranking
Total Fatal and Injury 328 62/105
Alcohol Involved 22 79/105
Had Been Drinking Driver < 21 0 95/105
Had Been Drinking Driver 21 – 34 3 85/105
Motorcycles 7 80/105
Pedestrians 4 102/105
Pedestrians < 15 0 104/105
Pedestrians 65+ 1 87/105
Bicyclists 7 92/105
Bicyclists < 15 2 53/105
Composite 136 78/105
Speed Related 74 27/105
Night Time (9 PM - 3 AM) 27 67/105

3.3 FOCUSED CRASH NETWORK
The focused crash network involved identifying the intersections and midblock collision locations that have the highest Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) crash costs. The EPDO crash costs are a cost associated with the severity of each crash consistent with the LRSP Manual Appendix D (Benefit/Cost Ratio Calculations).

3.3.1 Intersections
Intersection crash locations were identified by reviewing the number of crashes at each intersection throughout the City. The 15 highest intersection collision locations are listed in order of crash cost in Table 3-11 and shown in Figure 3-6. Intersections that are under Caltrans jurisdiction are noted. The full list of intersection collision data is provided in Appendix B.

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 17

Table 3-11 Intersection Collision Locations

3.4.2 Midblock
Midblock crash locations were identified by reviewing the number of crashes at each midblock crash location along each street. The 15 highest streets are listed in order of midblock crash costs in Table 3-

12. The full list of midblock collision data is provided in Appendix C.

Table 3-12 Midblock Collision Locations by Severity

3.4.3 Segment

Total collisions were computed for each major street. Total collisions include both the intersection collisions (defined by primary street) and midblock collisions along the defined segment. The calculation of total crash rates provides comparative information for roadway segments by considering the exposure No.Intersection Fatal
Severe
Injury
Visible
Injury
Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage Only
(PDO)
Total
Collisions Crash Costs
1 16TH ST & CAMPUS AV 1 14 18 4 37 5,091,600
2 7TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 6 31 2 40 4,978,300
3 13TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 13 15 2 31 4,680,000
8 FOOTHILL BL & REDDING WY 2 4 8 4 18 4,449,600
4 CAMPUS AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 8 19 6 34 4,345,300
5 8TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 10 12 5 28 4,050,300
6 FOOTHILL BL & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 6 18 2 27 3,926,600
7 EUCLID AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 7 16 24 3,880,500
9 FOOTHILL BL & MOUNTAIN AV 1 6 17 1 25 3,832,400
10 BENSON AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 6 13 3 23 3,535,400
11 ARROW HWY & MOUNTAIN AV 5 31 4 40 3,272,600
12 GROVE AV & LOMA SOLA AV 1 1 1 3 3,260,900
13 16TH ST & EUCLID AV 13 15 4 32 3,116,600
14 9TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 6 5 3 15 2,888,200
15 5TH AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 2 11 2 16 2,791,100
No.Corridors Fatal
Severe
Injury
Other
Injury
Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage
Only (PDO)
Total
Collisions Crash Costs
1 FOOTHILL BL 4 20 50 11 85 13,397,300
2 MOUNTAIN AV 1 3 16 47 12 79 12,598,700
3 EUCLID AV 1 1 14 15 5 36 6,452,200
8 16TH ST/BASELINE RD 1 9 14 3 27 4,043,200
4 ARROW HWY/RT 11 25 2 38 3,614,400
5 19TH ST 1 4 3 2 10 2,428,500
6 11TH ST 1 3 3 7 2,259,600
7 9TH ST 1 2 4 1 8 2,211,500
9 CENTRAL AV 1 4 1 6 1,926,900
10 BENSON AV 5 12 5 22 1,748,800
11 CAMPUS AV 7 6 3 16 1,521,400
12 SAN ANTONIO AV 4 5 1 10 987,000
13 7TH ST 3 4 1 8 763,800
14 8TH ST 2 5 1 8 702,400
15 SAN BERNARDINO RD 2 1 3 297,900

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 18

to traffic volumes and length of the segment. The collision frequency and collision rate were calculated for primary corridors in Upland. The determination of crash rates for roadway segments is based on the following segment characteristics:

 Roadway segment length (feet)
 Roadway segment average daily traffic (ADT)
 Total number of crashes for segments

In addition, EPDO crash costs were calculated. The total collisions, collision severity, collision rates, and crash costs for the 15 highest segments in Upland are shown in Table 3-13 and shown in Figure 3-7. The full list of segment collision data is provided in Appendix D.

Table 3-13 Segment Collision Rates (all collisions)

3.4 SAFETY EMPHASIS AREAS
Safety emphasis areas provide a focus for developing projects and programs. Based on the collision data analysis conducted for the City of Upland and from stakeholder input, these are the transportation safety emphasis areas to consider in addressing the goals of the LRSP.  Intersection safety
 Speed management
 Roadside safety
 Bicyclist Safety
 Pedestrian Safety
 Driving under Influence (DUI)
 Distracted Driving

No.Corridors
Total
Collisions Fatal
Severe
Injury
Visible
Injury
Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage Only
(PDO)ADT Length VMT
Collison
Rate Crash Costs
1 FOOTHILL BL 279 14 62 170 33 27,850 4.05 563,963 1.36 45,274,500 2 EUCLID AV 288 2 6 105 141 34 37,321 1.61 300,434 2.63 39,520,600 3 MOUNTAIN AV 260 4 6 63 162 25 27,136 4.35 590,208 1.21 38,303,200 4 ARROW HWY/ARROW RT 174 1 47 114 12 10,062 4.19 210,799 2.26 17,660,300 5 CAMPUS AV 148 2 37 90 19 15,811 3.41 269,578 1.50 15,978,800 6 16TH ST/BASELINE RD 132 1 1 47 71 12 16,100 4.06 326,830 1.11 15,771,600 7 9TH ST 64 3 22 26 13 7,650 3.49 133,493 1.31 10,176,900 8 BENSON AV 93 1 29 48 15 17,913 3.98 356,469 0.71 9,799,400 9 SAN ANTONIO AV 68 2 23 38 5 10,944 4.12 225,446 0.83 9,593,600 10 7TH ST 55 1 1 11 32 10 12,647 2.74 173,264 0.87 7,467,100 11 19TH ST 31 2 14 12 3 6,400 2.13 68,160 1.25 6,182,900 12 8TH ST 67 18 40 9 10,602 2.73 144,717 1.27 5,917,100 13 11TH ST 50 1 15 25 9 6,482 3.07 99,499 1.38 5,866,700 14 CENTRAL AV 17 1 1 1 10 4 15,153 0.72 54,551 0.85 4,184,500 15 GROVE AV 10 1 1 1 3 4 2,298 1.76 20,222 1.35 3,618,200

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 19

3.4.1 Intersection Safety
Eighty percent of collisions occurred at intersections (250 feet to the center of the intersection). The most frequent collision type within intersection areas are broadside collisions. Broadside collisions often occur at intersections and can result where drivers fail to yield or obey stop-controls, where a gap in traffic is misjudged, or a when a turning vehicle fails to yield the right of way to another vehicle. Broadside collisions can be affected by driver error, driver inattention, signal timing and signal or sign visibility.

Contributing Factors
High pedestrian activity
Inconsistent placement of signal heads
Poor visibility of signal heads
Unprotected left turn phasing
Protected-permitted phasing
Side street stop issues entering major street
Where a left-turning vehicle does not yield under a permitted condition Driver inattention
Travel speed
Driveways poorly placed

The locations of the most frequent broadside collisions are listed in Table 3-14 and shown in Figure 3-8.

Table 3-14 Frequent Broadside Collisions

3.4.2 Speed Management
Twenty-nine percent of the total crashes were caused by drivers involved in Rear End collisions. Rear-end crashes often occur under congested scenarios where motorists do not react in time to a slowing of traffic downstream, or in cases where drivers are distracted under uncongested conditions. Rear-end crashes constituted the second most frequent collision type in Upland, with speeding the primary factor in 73% of the rear-end collisions.

No.Intersections Broadside
1 13TH ST & EUCLID AV 25
2 16TH ST & CAMPUS AV 22
3 7TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 19
4 8TH ST & EUCLID AV 19
5 ARROW HWY & EUCLID AV 16
6 11TH ST & EUCLID AV 15
7 21ST ST & EUCLID AV 15
8 7TH ST & EUCLID AV 15
9 ARROW HWY & MOUNTAIN AV 15
10 ARROW HWY & PALM AV 14
11 9TH ST & EUCLID AV 13
12 16TH ST & EUCLID AV 12
13 14TH ST & EUCLID AV 11
14 8TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 11
15 ARROW HWY & SAN ANTONIO AV 11

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 20

Contributing Factors
Traffic congestion
High speeds on intersection approach
Yellow time / all red time
Approach grades too steep
Poor visibility of signal heads

The most frequent locations of collisions involving rear end are listed in Table 3-15 and shown in Figure 3-9.

Table 3-15 Frequent Rear End Collisions

3.4.3 Roadside Safety
Hit object was the third most frequent collision type at thirteen percent. On urban streets, hit objects involved locations with changes in street width or where objects such as trees or signs are located close to the street. On rural roadways, hit objects involved collisions on roadway curves or narrow sections.

Contributing Factors
Object located close to or in medians of roadway
Curves
Poor lane markings
Lack of clear zone

The locations of hit object collisions are listed in Table 3-16 and shown in Figure 3-10.

No.Intersections Rear End
1 CAMPUS AV & FOOTHILL BL 14
2 FOOTHILL BL & SAN ANTONIO AV 14
3 7TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 13
4 FOOTHILL BL & MOUNTAIN AV 13
5 ARROW HWY & MOUNTAIN AV 12
6 FOOTHILL BL & REDDING WY 12
7 EUCLID AV & FOOTHILL BL 11
8 16TH ST & EUCLID AV 10
9 BENSON AV & FOOTHILL BL 10
10 5TH AV & FOOTHILL BL 10
11 19TH ST & CAMPUS AV 9
12 8TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 9
13 9TH ST & EUCLID AV 8
14 16TH ST & CAMPUS AV 8
15 ARROW HWY & CAMPUS AV 7

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 21

Table 3-16 Frequent Hit Object Collisions

3.4.4 Bicycle Safety
Bicycle-related collisions accounted for 5% of the total collisions, and 13% of the bicycle related collisions resulted in a severe injury or fatality. The primary factor for bicycle collisions was conflicts with automobiles along a travel lane. In addition, collisions at intersections involved turns or where the vehicle or the bicycle did not follow traffic signs or signals.

Contributing Factors
Lack of separation between bicycle and vehicles, particularly on higher speeds streets Side street stop issues entering major street
Where a left-turning vehicle does not yield under a permitted condition Driver inattention
Travel speed

The locations of the most frequent bicycle collisions noting collision locations were there was a fatal or severe injury are listed in Table 3-17 and shown in Figure 3-11.

No.Intersections Hit Object
1 16TH ST & EUCLID AV 5
2 20TH ST & CAMPUS AV 5
3 ARROW HWY & MOUNTAIN AV 4
4 19TH ST & CAMPUS AV 4
5 CAMPUS AV & COLONIES PKWY 4
6 13TH ST & EUCLID AV 3
7 8TH ST & EUCLID AV 3
8 21ST ST & EUCLID AV 3
9 7TH ST & EUCLID AV 3
10 ARROW HWY & CAMPUS AV 3
11 CAMPUS AV & FOOTHILL BL 3
12 3RD PL & FOOTHILL BL 3
13 ARROW HWY & SAN BERNARDINO RD 3
14 9TH ST & EUCLID AV 2
15 16TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 2

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 22

Table 3-17 Frequent Bicycle Collisions

No. Intersection
Bicycle
Collision
1 9TH ST & EUCLID AV 5
2 11TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 4
2 16TH ST & EUCLID AV 4
2 BENSON AV & FOOTHILL BL 4
2 BIKE PATH & MOUNTAIN AV 4
6 11TH ST & EUCLID AV 3
6 FOOTHILL BL & WILSON AV 3
8 11TH ST & 3RD AV 2
8 21ST ST & EUCLID AV 2
8 8TH ST & EUCLID AV 2
8 8TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 2
8 9TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 2
8 ARROW HWY & EUCLID AV 2
8 FOOTHILL BL & HOSPITAL PKWY 2
8 FOOTHILL BL & MOUNTAIN AV 2

3.4.5 Pedestrian Safety
Just over 4% of all collisions involved a pedestrian. Pedestrian collisions can involve a higher level of collision severity than many auto only collisions. The locations of pedestrian collisions are listed in Table 3-18 and shown in Figure 3-12.

Contributing Factors
Right turn conflicts
Lack of pedestrian signal or countdown heads
Pedestrian visibility
Pedestrians crossing outside crosswalks

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 23

Table 3-18 Frequent Pedestrian Collisions

No. Intersection
Pedestrian
Collision
1 CAMPUS AV & FOOTHILL BL 6
2 ARROW HWY & MOUNTAIN AV 5
3 11TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 3
4 11TH ST & EUCLID AV 2
4 11TH ST & TULARE WY 2
4 13TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 2
4 7TH ST & BENSON AV 2
4 7TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 2
4 FOOTHILL BL & MOUNTAIN AV 2
4 FOOTHILL BL & REDDING WY 2

3.4.6 Driving Under the Influence
Driving under the influence (DUI) was a frequent collision factor. DUI was the primary factor for 14% of fatal and severe injury collisions.

Contributing Factors
Locations of bars and restaurants
Individual factors related to driving under the influence

3.4.7 Distracted Driving
Distracted driving refers to any activity that diverts the driver’s attention, thereby preventing them from driving safely. Common examples of distracted driving activities include non-hand-free mobile phone use, eating and drinking, and conversation. Although it is difficult to obtain distracted driving statistics from SWITRS data, this area of emphasis will be included in the LRSP.

Contributing Factors
Individual factors related to texting, phoning, etc. while driving

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 24

Figure 3-6 High Crash Locations (by EPDO Cost)

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 25

Figure 3-7 Segment Collisions

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 26

Figure 3-8 Broadside Collisions

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 27

Figure 3-9 Rear End Collisions

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 28

Figure 3-10 Hit Object Collisions

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 29

Figure 3-11 Bicycle Collisions

COLLISION ANALYSIS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 30

Figure 3-12 Pedestrian Collisions

SAFETY TOOLBOX
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 31

4.0 SAFETY TOOLBOX

4.1 BACKGROUND
This safety toolbox describes safety strategies that can be used to address intersections and roadways in Upland. The toolbox strategies are based on the review of high-priority corridors and intersections where safety improvements are most needed to achieve the goals in the LRSP . Safety countermeasures include strategies from the 4 E’s of roadway safety improvement related to collision patterns and emp hasis areas.

 Engineering addresses roadway infrastructure improvements to prevent crashes or reduce the severity of collision when they occur. Engineering safety countermeasures have been developed by Caltrans and are described in the LRSM for California Local Road owners.

 Education provides drivers information about making good choices, such as not texting while driving, avoiding alcohol or medications that affect the level of consciousness, wearing a seatbelt, or informing people about the rules of the road.

 Enforcement of traffic laws and a visible police presence tend to deter motorists from unsafe driving behavior.

 Emergency services provide rapid response and quality of care when responding to collisions that cause injury, by stabilizing victims and transporting them to other facilities.

4.2 ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES
Engineering countermeasures include safety remedies identified by Caltrans as described in the LRSM.

Caltrans has used information from the Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse and three other FHWA published safety manuals — Roadway Departure Safety, Intersection Safety, and Roadways Safety Information Analysis — in conjunction with its own research with the Safe Transportation Research and Education Center (SafeTREC) to develop the LRSM.

The full list of Caltrans HSIP approved countermeasures were reviewed in order to identify countermeasures with best potential to address collision patterns in Upland. These countermeasures listed in Table 4-1. The table indicates the crash type, crash reduction factors (CRF), federal funding eligibility for HSIP projects, and the systemic opportunity for countermeasures. The complete list of Caltrans HSIP approved countermeasures is provided in Appendix E.

SAFETY TOOLBOX
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 32

Table 4-1 Engineering Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Description Crash
Type CRF
Expected
Life
(Years)
Federal
Funding
Eligibility
Signalized Intersections:

S02
Improve Signal Hardware:

Lenses, Back-Plates,
Mounting, Size, and Number
All 15% 10 90%
S03
Improve signal timing
(coordination, phases, red,
yellow, or operation)
All 15% 10 50%
S17PB Install Pedestrian Countdown
Signal Heads P&B 25% 20 90%
Non-Signalized Intersections:

NS06
Install /upgrade intersection
warning /regulatory signage All 15% 10 90%
NS08
Install flashing beacons at
stop controlled intersections All 15% 10 90%

The information included in the countermeasures are:
• Crash Types - “All”, “P & B” (Pedestrian and Bicycle), “Night”, “Emergency Vehicle”, or “Animal”. • CRF - Crash Reduction Factor used for HSIP calls-for-projects. • Expected Life - 10 years or 20 years.
• Federal Funding Eligibility – the maximum federal reimbursement ratio.

The countermeasure description refers to each countermeasure with an identification letter and number.

4.2.1 Signalized Intersections
The following engineering countermeasures were identified to best address the systemic collision patterns and higher crash locations in Upland for signalized intersections.

SAFETY TOOLBOX
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 33

S02. Improve Signal Hardware: lenses, back-plates with
retro-reflective borders, new signal mountings,
increased signal head size, and number of signal heads.

Improved signal hardware applies at signalized
intersections with broadside and rear-end crashes where drivers have difficulty seeing traffic signals sufficiently in advance. This countermeasure can include new LED
lighting, signal back plates, retro-reflective tape outlining the back plates, visors to increase signal visibility, larger signal heads, relocation of the signal heads, additional signal heads, the addition of near side signals, or high mount signals at locations where intersection visibility may be affected. Use of Retro-reflective Tape

S03. Improve Signal Timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improving signal timings can be effective in reducing certain crash patterns at multiple signalized intersections along a corridor. Signal timing improvements may include adding phases, lengthening clearance intervals, eliminating or restricting higher-risk movements, and coordinating signals at multiple locations.

Example signal timing plan where red and yellow times would be adjusted

SAFETY TOOLBOX
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 34

S17PB. Install Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads
Installation of pedestrian countdown signal heads is applicable where there have been pedestrian/vehicle crashes. A pedestrian countdown signal contains a timer display and counts down the number of seconds remaining for pedestrians to cross the street.

Countdown signals can reassure pedestrians who are in the crosswalk when the walk interval ends that they still have time to finish crossing. Countdown signals begin counting down either when the "WALK" interval ends and stops at the beginning of the steady "DON’T WALK" interval. These signals encourage more pedestrians to use the pushbutton, rather than jaywalk.

4.2.2 Non-Signalized Intersection Countermeasures
NS03. Install Signals
Installing a new traffic signal is used to prevent the most severe crash types (broadside, right angle).

Traffic signals can lead to rear end crashes and can add traffic delay to the major travel movements. The overall reduction in crash severity is the greatest safety benefit of this co untermeasure.

NS06. Install/Upgrade Larger or Additional Stops Signs or Other Intersection/Regulation Signs.

New sign guidance is periodically developed and described in the Manual of Uniform Control Devices (MUTCD). A minimum size of 36 x 36 inches should be used for stop signs that face multi-lane approaches. Where side roads intersect a multi-lane street or highway that has a speed limit of 45 mph or higher, the minimum size of the STOP signs facing the side road approaches, even if the side road only has one approach lane, shall be 36 x 36 inches. Where side roads intersect a multi-lane street or highway that has a speed limit of 40 MPH or lower, the minimum size of the STOP signs facing the side road
approaches shall be as shown in the Single Lane (30 x 30 inches) or Multi-lane (36 x 36 inches) as stated in Table 2B-1 and 2B- 1(CA).

SAFETY TOOLBOX
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 35

NS09. Install Flashing Beacons as advance warning
Flashing beacons provide a visible signal to the presence of an intersection. Advance flashing beacons are used to increase the driver’s awareness of an approaching non- signalized intersection. Most advanced flashing beacons can be powered by solar, reducing the need for a power source.

4.3 EDUCATION COUNTERMEASURES
Education programs at schools
School education programs include campaigns to educate students about factors affecting safety such safe pedestrian actions, and for high school students, the dangers of speeding, texting and driving under the influence. Education strategies can include the following:

 Expand school safety programs to bring police officers to Elementary School, Middle School and High Schools that will address speeding and texting while driving.  Start a social media campaign at local middle and high schools, encouraging students to post videos on the danger of using their phones while driving.  Host hands-on bicycle safety events at local schools. These can include Bicycle Safety Skills Programs, which teach students how to operate bicycles safely, and walk/bike to school days, carnival-like events featuring interactive educational activities about bicycling.  Host hands-on pedestrian safety events at local schools. These can include pedestrian safety skills programs-teaching students how to cross the street safely and walk/bike to school days, carnival- like events featuring interactive educational activities about walking.  Host interactive pedestrian education programs at local schools. These include pedestrian rodeos, enclosed training courses with challenges addressing different skill areas (e.g., rules of the road, blind spots, and directions to look in when crossing the street).

Education programs for the General Public
General public programs include campaigns to educate the public about factors affecting vehicle safety such as the dangers of speeding, texting and driving under the influence. These can include safety posts, tweets, billboards or even more detailed bicycle safety or vehicle safety programs. Possible activities include:

SAFETY TOOLBOX
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 36

 Provide bike safe programs for persons of all ages and training courses for first-time adult riders.  Set up portable changeable message signs to display drunk driving, distracted driving, speeding, and other factors.
 Create a social media campaign related to travel speeds  Investigate related programs such as the Go Human program operated by SCAG to increase safety awareness of all travel modes.

Example safety education program “Go Human” led by SCAG

4.4 ENFORCEMENT COUNTERMEASURES
Police Enforcement
Strategies for providing additional police enforcement for speeding and for driving under the influence include:
 The Police Department participates in the California Office of Traffic Safety STEP grant every year.

This grant provides funding to hold DUI checkpoints, DUI saturation patrols and traffic enforcement operations that focus on primary collision factors.
 Implement targeted enforcement programs to focus police resources to areas where bicyclists face a high risk of collision or tend to engage in unsafe practices.  Coordinate with the Police Department on bicycle rules and safety considerations, so that enforcement of bicycle-related traffic violations can occur.  Periodically enforce locations with high crossing activity to monitor and cite traffic law violations by motorists and pedestrians.
 Continue to deploy police officers equipped with radar or LIDAR technology at strategic locations to ticket speeding drivers. Provide additional offices and equipment for officers to enforce speeding and red light running.
 Utilize a Checkpoint Program to provide enforcement of DUI laws.

SAFETY TOOLBOX
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 37

Use of Automated Devices to Encourage Compliance
Strategies to reduce vehicle speeds include use of speed feedback signs at locations where traffic calming may be needed, or provision of automated equipment to identify speeding vehicles.

4.5 EMERGENCY SERVICE COUNTERMEASURES
Emergency service countermeasures
include enacting strategies targeted at
reducing response time for first
responders, thus increasing the chance of
survival for a person involved in a crash.

This can include signal pre-emption for
emergency vehicles.

4.6 OTHER PROGRAMS
Other approaches outside of the data driven local roadway safety plan approach are described below:

Reducing Speed Limits
Excessive speed has been identified as a major factor in collisions. The City of Upland Engineering & Traffic Survey included speed surveys for roadways in Upland. This report is required to be completed on a regular basis and is used to establish speed limits consistent with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Traffic Control Devices. Setting of speed limits is based on a number of factors, including the existing characteristics of a roadway and determining the speed at which 85% of vehicles do not exceed. In 2024, there will be additional flexibility to lower speed limi ts in a number of cases. New CVC Section 22358.7, also passed through AB 43, would allow a further five mph reduction in the speed limit based on 85 percentile speeds for designated safety corridors or where high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians are present.

SAFETY TOOLBOX
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 38

Neighborhood Traffic Calming
A number of cities in Southern California have developed Neighborhood Traffic Management Plans and Programs. The objective of this program is to establish a systematic approach to address excessive speeds by identifying physical and visual traffic control devices that can be implemented along neighborhood streets and in some cases along collector routes. This process involves identifying a process to handle traffic calming requests, describe traffic calming measures and prioritize projects.

Active Transportation Plans
Active Transportation Plans identify projects and programs to develop pedestrian and bicycle networks that improve safety. The City of Upland has submitted a grant application to Caltrans for the funding of an active transportation plan. This plan will assess citywide pedestrian, bicycle and access to transit needs, and will be used to identify additional safety projects related to these modes.

Safe Routes to School Plans
Safety around schools can be addressed comprehensively by conducting a safe routes to school study.

This project type involves working with schools, the school district and parents to identify potential improvements to the pedestrian and bicycle systems to be used by students.

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 39

5.0 PRIORITY PROJECTS

5.1 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

This section describes safety projects and programs that address high collision locations and provide systemic safety approach. Based on the review of collision patterns and existing safety infrastructure, the following safety project investments provide the highest impact:

1) Improve signal hardware
2) Provide pedestrian countdown heads at signalized intersections 3) Improve signal timing and coordination
4) Address specific issues at non-signalized intersections

Safety projects were developed using the traffic safety toolbox included in Section 4. This section describes locations where the countermeasure are applied, the collisions addressed, construction and project development costs, and the effectiveness of the countermeasure. Project benefits and Benefit/Cost ratios are listed for each project group, and were calculated using the HSIP Analyzer form provided by Caltrans for use in preparing HSIP applications.

This section evaluates projects for future HSIP funding. For HSIP applications, the minimum project cost is $200,000 and for the previous HSIP Cycle 10, the minimum B/C ratio for a project to be considered was

3.5. However, given the competitiveness of the last round of HSIP applications, the average B/C ratio of the approved projects was 12.3.

Additional non-HSIP safety projects and programs have also been identified that could be pursued locally or without HSIP funding. These are projects found to provide safety benefits, but may not be included in the LRSM countermeasures, or do not meet the anticipated HSIP cost-effectiveness thresholds. These projects and programs are summarized at the end of this section.

5.2 CITYWIDE SIGNAL HARDWARE UPGRADES
Collisions at signalized intersections can be addressed by providing improvements to signal hardware and adding pedestrian countdown heads. These improvements improve the visibility of signals to motorists, and adding pedestrian countdown heads provide more information for pedestrians crossing at intersections.

LRSP Countermeasures
This project includes two LRSP countermeasures:

S02. Improve Signal Hardware: lenses, back-plates with retro-reflective borders.

Caltrans have identified improving the placement and visibility of signal heads as an approach to address broadside, rear end and other intersection collisions. In recent years, the standard for the size of signal heads has increased to a twelve (12) inch diameter. This project will increase signal visibility by replacing the eight (8) inch signal heads with larger signal heads, by replacing back plates, and by adding reflective borders.

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 40

S17PB. Install Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads
This countermeasure is the installation of pedestrian countdown signal heads to provide pedestrian safety benefits at signalized intersections. The project also includes adding ADA compliant push buttons at 40 intersections.

Project Location
Shown in Figure 5-1 and Table 5-1 are the recommended locations for signal improvements by increasing the visibility of signal heads, replacing back plates and providing signal countdown heads.

Figure 5-1 Signal Upgrade Locations

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 41

Table 5-1 Countermeasure S02 S17PB Signal Hardware Upgrades

44 13th St X
1 Grove 3 X 45 11th St 6 X
2 Alta Ave 3 X 46 Arrow Hwy 8 X
3 Hospital Pkwy X X 47 9th St 8 X X
4 Campus Ave X X 48 8th St 4 X X
5 5th Ave 4 X X 49 Moreno/7th St X X
6 2nd Ave 6 X San Antonio Ave
7 Euclid Ave 7 X X 50 16th St X
8 Redding Way X 51 Arrow Hwy X X
9 San Antionio Ave X X 52 8th St 6 X X
10 Mulberry Ave X X 53 9th St X
11 Mountain Ave X X 54 11th St X
12 Benson Ave 2 X X Campus Avenue
13 Central Ave 4 X X 55 16th St 4 X
14 Dewey Way X X 56 15th St X
15 Monte Vista Ave 4 X X 57 14th St X X
Euclid Ave 58 13th St X
16 19th St 8 X X 59 11th St X
17 18th St 4 X X 60 Arrow Hwy X X
18 16th St 4 X X 61 Crossroads Dr X X
19 14th St 4 X X 62 Colonies Pkwy X X
20 11th St 5 X X 63 Viewpoint St X X
21 Arrow Hwy 8 X X 16th St
22 Pac Elect Trl X 64 Tanglewood Ave/Ct X
23 9th St 8 X X 65 Upland Hills Dr X
24 8th St 10 X X 66 2nd Ave X
25 7th St 10 X X Baseline Rd
67 Park View Promenade X
26 Benson Ave/21st St X 19th St
27 19th St X 68 Colonies Pkwy X X
28 18th St 8 X X 69 Colonies Crossroad X X
29 17th St X Arrow Highway
30 16th St X 70 San Bernardino Rd X X
31 14th X X 71 5th Ave X X
32 15th St X X 72 3rd Ave X X
33 13th St X X 73 2nd Ave X X
34 11th St X X 74 Monte Vista Ave X
35 Arrow Hwy X X 75 College Park Dr X
36 Pacific Elect Trl X 8th St
37 9th St X X 76 Sherman Way X X
38 8th St X X Central Ave
39 7th St 4 X X 77 11th St X X
Benson Ave 78 Arrow X X
40 18th St X X 79 9th St X
41 16th St / Baseline Rd 4 X San Bernardino Rd
42 15th St X 80 11th Ave X X
43 Fire Station X 81 Hospital X X
Mountain Ave
Foothill Blvd
Street
Signal
Heads
Back
Plate
Signal
Countdown No. Street
Signal
Heads
Back
Plate
Signal
Countdown No.

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 42

Collision Data
Table 5-2 lists the number, severity and type of collisions that would be addressed by the project.

Table 5-2 Intersection Collisions

Project Cost Estimate
Table 5-3, lists estimated project costs to include the construction items, mobilization, and traffic control.

Project development and implementation costs are shown in Table 5-4. This countermeasure is ninety percent (90%) funded by Caltrans, with a local share for this project of $216,402.

Table 5-3 S02 S17PB Construction Items

Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible
Injury
Complaint of
Pain
Property
Damage Only
2 17 246 555 103
Total Severity
Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible
Injury
Complaint of
Pain
Property
Damage Only
Pedestrian Severity
2 2 12 16 2
Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
1 Signal Heads Upgrade EA 146 1,050$ 153,300$
2 Retro-reflective Back plate Tape EA *81 5,100$ 413,100$ 3 Signal Countdown Heads EA 432 1,650$ 712,800$ 4 ADA Push Buttons EA 120 1,325$ 159,000$
5 Mobilization LS 70,000$
6 Traffic Control LS 100,000$
Total 1,608,200$
Contingencies (10% of Construction)160,820$
1,769,020$ Total Construction Cost
* per intersection

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 43

Table 5-4 S02 S17PB Project Development Costs

Project Benefit – Cost Ratio
The project benefits were calculated using HSIP crash reduction factors. Project benefits divided by total costs provides the Benefit/Cost ratio. As shown in Table 5-5, the Benefit/Cost ratio is 21.88. Based on project need and effectiveness, this project is recommended for a HSIP Cycle 11 funding application.

Table 5-5 S02 S17PB Benefit - Cost

5.3 CITYWIDE SIGNAL TIMING IMPROVEMENTS
Traffic safety at intersections was addressed by reviewing and adjusting signal timing and phasing. Signal timing measures include using only protected signal phasing, reviewing signal phase sequence, examining yellow clearance times, and examining all red clearance times.

LRSP Countermeasure
This project includes this LRSP countermeasure:

S03. Improve Signal Timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Broadside, rear end collisions and other collision types within intersections areas are addressed by improving signal timing to extend yellow and red times, and by providing protected left turn phasing.

This project will include analysis to optimize signal timing and implement the changes in the field.

Description Total Cost HSIP Total %HSIP Funds
Local /
Other
Funds
Environmental $35,000 90%$31,500 $3,500
PS&E $180,000 90%$162,000 $18,000
Subtotal - PS&E $215,000 90%$193,500 $21,500
Right of Way Engineering $0 90%$0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions & Utilities $0 90%$0 $0
Subtotal - Right-of-Way $0 90%$0 $0
Construction Engineering $180,000 90%$162,000 $18,000
Construction Items $1,769,020 90%$1,592,118 $176,902
Subtotal - Construction $1,949,020 90%$1,754,118 $194,902 Project Total $2,164,020 90%$1,947,618 $216,402
Total Benefit
$47,341,456
Total Cost Benefit/Cost Ratio
$2,164,020 21.88

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 44

Project Location
This countermeasure is applied to support corridor-wide signal coordination. The Foothill Boulevard and Euclid Avenue corridors were identified as locations to evaluate this countermeasure.

Collision Data
Table 5-6 lists the number, severity and type of collisions from 2015-19 that were used in the analysis.

The collisions are shown for each corridor separately.

Table 5-6 S03 Countermeasure Collisions
For Foothill Boulevard:

For Euclid Avenue:

Project Cost Estimate
Project costs were estimated consistent with HSIP format to include the construction costs. This type of project will not involve mobilization or traffic control. Project are shown in Table 5-7. Table 5-8 shows the total cost including project implementation. This countermeasure is fifty percent (50%) funded by Caltrans, with a local share for this project of $96,000.

Table 5-7 S03 Construction Items
* per intersection

Fatal Severe
Injury
Other Visible
Injury
Complaint of
Pain
Property
Damage Only
Severity
0 10 50 145 29
Fatal Severe
Injury
Other Visible
Injury
Complaint of
Pain
Property
Damage Only
0 2 62 94 25
Severity
Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
Foothill Blvd EA *15 5,000$ 75,000$
Euclid Ave EA *9 5,000$ 45,000$
3 Mobilization LS 1 -$ -$
4 Traffic Control LS 1 -$ -$
120,000$
12,000$
132,000$ Total Construction Cost
1 Total
Contingencies (10% of Construction)

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 45

Table 5-8 S03 Project Development Costs

Project Benefit – Cost Ratio
The project benefits were estimated using the HSIP crash reduction factor for this countermeasure of fifteen percent (15%) applied to the preventable collisions listed above. Project benefits divided by total costs provides the Benefit/Cost Ratio. As shown in Table 5-9, the Benefit/Cost ratio is 96.64. This Benefit/Cost Ratio is high demonstrating that improvements to signal timing can provide safety benefits.

However, given the total project cost and with the larger local share percentage with this countermeasure, this signal coordination and timing project can be completed as a local project as funding allows.

Table 5-9 S03 Benefit – Cost

5.4 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - ADD SIGNAL
LRSP Countermeasure
This project includes this LRSP countermeasure:

NS03. Install Signals
Traffic signals are used to prevent the most severe crash types (broadside, right angle). Traffic signals can lead to rear end crashes and can add traffic delay to the major travel movements. The overall reduction in crash severity is the greatest safety benefit of this countermeasure.

Description Total Cost HSIP
Total %HSIP Funds Local /
Other Funds
Environmental $10,000 50%$5,000 $5,000
PS&E $30,000 50%$15,000 $15,000
Subtotal - PS&E $40,000 50%$20,000 $20,000
Right of Way Engineering $0 50%$0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions & Utilities $0 50%$0 $0
Subtotal - Right-of-Way $0 50%$0 $0
Construction Engineering $20,000 50%$10,000 $10,000
Construction Items $132,000 50%$66,000 $66,000
Subtotal - Construction $152,000 50%$76,000 $76,000
Project Total $192,000 50%$96,000 $96,000
Location Total Benefit
Foothill Blvd $11,836,795
Euclid Ave $6,717,790
Total:$18,554,585
Total Cost Benefit/Cost Ratio
$101,760 116.32
$90,240 74.44
$192,000 96.64

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 46

Project Location
This project location is the non-signalized intersection of Euclid Avenue and 13th Street, which would be converted to a signalized intersection as shown in the concept layout in Figure 5-2.

Figure 5-2 Signal Concept

Collision Data
Table 5-10 lists the number, severity and type of collisions from 2015-19 that were used in the analysis.

Table 5-10 NS03 Countermeasure Collisions

Project Cost Estimate
Project costs are shown in Table 5-11. Table 5-12 shows the total project cost including project implementation. This countermeasure is ninety percent (90%) funded by Caltrans, with a local share for this project of $70,100.

Fatal Severe Injury
Other Visible
Injury
Complaint of
Pain
Property
Damage Only
Severity
1 0 13 15 2

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 47

Table 5-11 NS03 Construction Items

Table 5-12 NS03 Project Development Costs

Project Benefit – Cost Ratio
The project benefits were estimated using the HSIP crash reduction factor for this countermeasure applied to the preventable collisions listed above. Project benefits divided by total costs provides the Benefit/Cost Ratio. As shown in Table 5-13, the Benefit/Cost ratio is 9.51.

Table 5-13 NS03 Benefit – Cost

Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
1 Signal EA 1 $550,000 $550,000
3 Mobilization
LS
$40,000
4 Traffic Control LS $20,000
$610,000
$61,000
$671,000
Total
Contingencies (10% of Construction)
Total Construction Cost
Description Total Cost HSIP Total %HSIP Funds
Local /
Other
Funds
Environmental $10,000 90%$9,000 $1,000
PS&E $45,000 90%$40,500 $4,500
Subtotal - PS&E $55,000 90%$49,500 $5,500
Right of Way Engineering $0 90%$0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions & Utilities $0 90%$0 $0
Subtotal - Right-of-Way $0 90%$0 $0
Construction Engineering $30,000 90%$27,000 $3,000
Construction Items $671,000 90%$603,900 $67,100
Subtotal - Construction $701,000 90%$630,900 $70,100
Total Benefit
$7,185,841 $756,000 9.51
Total Cost Benefit/Cost Ratio

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 48

5.5 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Safety measures were identified for key non-signalized intersections and include the countermeasures described below.

LRSP Countermeasures
This project includes the following LRSP countermeasures:

LRSP Countermeasure
NS06 Install/Upgrade intersection stop signs or other intersection warning signs NS08 Install flashing beacons at stop controlled intersections

Project Description and Location
This project involves addressing collisions at non-signalized intersections along Euclid Avenue and San Antonio Boulevard.

Euclid Avenue
Euclid Avenue intersections include five side street stop-controlled intersections at 21st Street, 20th Street, 17th Street, 15th Street, and 13th Street. Strategies to address these locations are illustrated in Figure 5-3 and are based on:
 Review of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual and AASHTO Intersection Sight Distance standards for a passenger car. To improve sight distance, a red curb parking restriction is added to provide for a minimum 100 feet back from the intersection on the north and south approaches.

 Advance placement of warning sign are located in advance of unsignalized intersections. Street names are added to advance cross warning sign and enhanced utilizing flashing beacons added at 13th Street and 21st Street. If after implementation, the above improvements do not reduce collisions, an active warning system could be provided where detection of vehicles at stop bar on the cross street triggers a flashing intersection warning beacon on Euclid Avenue.

 Large stop signs (4 per intersection) placed at Euclid Avenue and 21st Street, 20th Street, 17th Street, 15th Street, and 13th Street.

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 49

Existing northbound and southbound approaches at 13th and Euclid Avenue

Figure 5-3 Example Improvement Concept (13th Street and Euclid Avenue)

San Antonio Avenue
Larger stop signs (36 inch x 36 inch) would be placed at 11 all-way stop locations at 23rd Street, 22nd Street, 21st Street, 20th Street, 19th Street, 18th Street, 17th Street, 15th Street, 14th Street, 13th Street and 7th Street. The existing stop signs are 30-inch.

Collision Data
Table 5-14 lists the number, severity and type of collisions from 2015-19 that were used in the analysis.

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 50

Table 5-14 NS06 NS08 Countermeasure Collisions
Detail for Euclid Avenue Corridor:

Total Project Collisions:

Project Cost Estimate
Project costs include the construction items, mobilization, and traffic control as shown in Table 5-15.

Table 5-16 shows the total cost following project implementation. This countermeasure is ninety percent (90%) funded by Caltrans, with a local share for this project of $22,984.

Table 5-15 NS06 NS08 Construction Items

Intersection Fatal
Severe
Injury
Visible
Injury
Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage
Only
(PDO)
Total
Collisions Crash Costs
21ST ST & EUCLID AV 7 12 19 1,966,900
20TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 1 2 94,200
17TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 4 3 2 10 2,428,500
15TH ST & EUCLID AV 4 5 1 10 987,000
13TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 13 15 2 31 4,680,000
Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible
Injury
Complaint of
Pain
Property
Damage Only
1 3 34 48 6
Severity
Item Description Unit Quantitity Unit Cost Total
1 Large Stop Signs EA 42 500$ 21,000$
2 Flashing Beacons EA 8 11,000$ 88,000$
3 Curb and Pavement Markings LF 1800 3$ 5,400$ 4 Mobilization LS 1 20,000$ 12,000$
5 Traffic Control LS 1 30,000$ 18,000$
144,400$
14,440$
158,840$
Total
Contingencies (10% of Construction)
Total Construction Cost

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 51

Table 5-16 NS06 NS08 Project Development Costs

Project Benefit – Cost Ratio
Evaluated in this benefit-cost analysis are:
 Advance flashing beacons/signage provided for northbound and southbound approaches of 13th Street and 21st Street
 Advance signage at 20th Street, 17th Street and 15th Street  No parking red curb designation for northbound and southbound approaches  Upgrade to 36 x 36 inch stop signs at the five intersections of Euclid Avenue  Upgrade to 36 x 36 inch stop signs at 11 intersections of San Antonio Avenue The project benefits were estimated using the HSIP crash reduction factor for these countermeasures were applied to the preventable collisions listed above. Project benefits divided by total costs provides the Benefit/Cost Ratio. As shown in Table 5-17, the Benefit/Cost ratio is 74.89. This project can be funded incrementally with local funds, rather than use of HSIP funding.

Table 5-17 NS06 NS08 Benefit - Cost

5.6 OTHER PROJECTS / PROGRAMS
Other projects and programs have been identified that address safety concerns that are either low-cost and would not be part of a HSIP grant, or are program related. The City of Upland is pursuing funding to complete an Active Transportation Plan. The pedestrian and bicycle strategies listed below will be studied in detail as part of that plan. Programs can be implemented to provide safety education and enforcement.

Description Total Cost
HSIP
Total
%
HSIP Funds
Local /
Other
Funds
Environmental $20,000 90%$18,000 $2,000
PS&E $25,000 90%$22,500 $2,500
Subtotal - PS&E $45,000 90%$40,500 $4,500
Right of Way Engineering $0 90%$0 $0
Appraisals, Acquistions & Utilities $0 90%$0 $0
Subtotal - Right-of-Way $0 90%$0 $0
Construction Engineering $26,000 90%$23,400 $2,600
Costruction Items $158,840 90%$142,956 $15,884
Subtotal - Consturction $184,840 90%$166,356 $18,484
Project Total $229,840 90%$206,856 $22,984
Total Benefit
$17,212,142
Total Cost Benefit/Cost Ratio
$229,840 74.89

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 52

Active Transportation
There are additional pedestrian and bicycle safety opportunities available in addition to the HSIP program.

Both Caltrans and SCAG have active transportation programs that provide funding and resources to identify pedestrian, bicycle and other active transportation modal needs, fund programs and fund projects. The City of Upland will be seeking to utilize these resources to further address pedestrian and bicycle safety.

The collision data evaluation developed in the LRSP can be used in active transportation plans to further evaluate use of enhanced pedestrian crossings, such as continental crosswalks at key signalized intersections. That plan will also evaluate bicycle safety projects including the use of adding conflict striping and bicycle boxes where bicycle lanes approach intersections.

Education Programs at Schools
The City can consider collaborating with other organizations to provide safety education. Example safety programs can be developed to promote driving at safe speeds and to not text while driving.

Bicycle Safety Programs

The City can consider collaborating with other organizations to provide bike safety programs for persons of all ages and providing training courses for first-time adult riders.

Enforcement

The City can continue to utilize OTS grant funding. This includes continuation of saturation operations, distracted driving operations, traffic enforcement, and sobriety checkpoints.

5.7 FUNDING SOURCES

The primary funding program for engineering projects that address travel safety is the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) that funds roadway improvements on public roadways. Caltrans administer this federal program. Also at the federal level, the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program funds technology to promote safety and efficiency in the transportation system.

Several state and federal grant programs offer to fund non-engineering roadway safety projects. The California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans) Active Transportation Program (ATP) encourages bicycle and pedestrian use in the state by funding programs that increase bike or pedestrian mode share or improve bicycle or pedestrian safety. Caltrans also administers the Sustainable Communities Grant Program, which awards grants to municipal projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and support Multi-modal transportation. The Sustainable Communities Program prioritizes projects that solicit stakeholder and community engagement and support state policies like the 2040 California Transportation Plan. The California Office of Traffic Safety awards grants for projects addressing any one or more of ten priority areas, including Driving Under the Influence, Distracted Driving, Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety, Police Enforcement, Safety Data Collection, and Marketing/Publicity Campaigns.

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 53

Table 5-18 provides a list of transportation safety programs and funding sources.

Table 5-18 Transportation Safety Funding Sources Summary Agency Source Eligible Programs Areas Addressed
Federal Highway
Administration
(FHWA)
Highway Safety
Improvement
Program (HSIP)
Any work on public roads, bikeways and
pedestrian paths/trails. For the most part,
only engineering projects are eligible.

Safety projects
Federal Highway
Administration
(FHWA)
Advanced
Transportation and
Congestion
Management
Technologies
Deployment
Program
Funds advanced transportation and
congestion management technologies to
improve safety, efficiency and
performance. Examples of funded project
types include advanced traveler
information systems, data collection, and
analysis efforts3.

Digital Enforcement;
Technology Partnerships
California
Department of
Transportation
(Caltrans)
Active
Transportation
Program (ATP)
Local government projects that improve
the safety or increase the mode share of
bicycling and walking. Additional program
objectives include reducing emissions and
enhancing public health4.

Bicycle and Pedestrian
Engineering projects,
Education and
Enforcement
California
Department of
Transportation
(Caltrans)
Sustainable
Communities Grant
Program
The program awards "Competitive Grants"
to local governments. These grants
prioritize projects that reduce Greenhouse
Gas Emissions, support multi-modal
transportation, involve stakeholder/
community engagement and support
related plans like the California
Transportation Plan and California
Complete Streets Framework5 .

Active Transportation
Education
California Office
of Traffic Safety
Office of Traffic
Safety (OTS) Grants
Programs should address one of ten
priority areas (six relevant ones listed to
the right). Grant recipients should expect
to wait up to 90 days before being
reimbursed/funded, and should be able
to provide traffic safety data to justify
funded programs6.

Driving under the
influence of
Drugs/Alcohol (DUI)
Distracted Driving
Pedestrian/Bike Safety
Police Enforcement
Roadway Safety and
Data Collection
Social Media/Marketing

PRIORITY PROJECTS
CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 54

Sources:

1. Highway Safety Improvement Program Guidelines, April 2016

2. Highway safety improvement program, Pub. L. No. 148, 23 US Code (2015). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/23/148 .

3. Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment. February 2016. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/advtranscongmgmtfs.cfm .

4. 2021 Active Transportation Program Guidelines. March 25, 2020. Resolution G-20-31.

5. California Department of Transportation. Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program. December 2019.

6. California Office of Traffic Safety Grant Manual for Federal Fiscal Year 2020. December 2019.

LRSP EVALAUATION

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP Page 55

6.0 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

EVALUATION
Since the Local Roadway Safety Plan aims to reduce collision risk, the Plan’s effectiveness should be evaluated in terms of collision reduction. To this end, the City of Upland should secure collision data from the California Office of Traffic Safety1 collision ranking system and California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS)2 on an annual basis. The collision trends following the LRSP’s adoption provide indicators of the plan’s success. The collision analysis should break out collisions by the following categories.
 Total collisions
 Fatality and severe injury collisions
 Pedestrian collisions
 Bicyclist collisions
 Collisions that involved bicyclists and pedestrians that are over 65 or under 15  Collisions that are caused by drunk drivers

These categories are included in both the OTS and SWITRS statistics. For each category, consider calculating an average for the most recent three years every year. The City can then plot the three-year average against the averages for past years to derive a general trend line. A downward-sloping trend line indicates an improvement in safety conditions. An upward sloping trend line suggests that additional safety measures should be considered. In the latter instance, the City should conduct further review and update the plan.

1 California Office of Traffic and Safety. https://www.ots.ca.gov/ots-and-traffic-safety/ 2 UC Berkeley Transportation Injury and Safety Mapping System. https://tims.berkeley.edu/help/SWITRS.php#Intro_to_SWITRS

APPENDIX

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP

Appendix A –
Stakeholder Summary

1 Upland LRSP Stakeholder Meeting
Stakeholder Meeting
May 26, 2022

MEETING NOTES

Participants:

Alan French, City of Upland Anna Jaiswal, Omni Transit Bob Critchfield, City of Upland Branden Yu, City of Upland
Zared Ibarra, San Bernardino County Fire Department
Mary Padres, Caltrans
Robyn Wilson, Upland Unified School District
Haissam Yahya, Caltrans

1. Presentation of Safety Information
A study presentation was made by KOA Corporation. The presentation included information on the following:

• Overview of collision data
• Review of key locations
• Review of more prominent collision types and factors
• Safety emphasis areas 2. Survey Question Discussion Question 1: What are some traffic safety locations that we should be aware of? Foothill and Euclid – this is a complex location. There can be power outages that impact signal operation. A battery backup would be good here.

Look into improving signal visibility by providing yellow strips around signal heads The police department has commented on these locations for speeding – Baseline, 16th Street, especially late at night

The median of Euclid is used for pedestrian travel. The crossing of 13th Street is a concern just to the north walking in the median, crossing 13th Street, safety issues.

2 Unsafe speeds in general, there are requests for speed bumps, and looking at road diets or road narrowing.

7th and Mountain – what is the issues here? It may be the high volume of traffic related to the freeway access
Campus and Baseline - Campus has shown to be a location of collisions. When the 210 interchange came in, this changed traffic flow. The street and lane width seems to not accommodate traffic flow well. At Baseline, there are major turning movements.

Speeding on Campus Avenue, south of Foothill. This street location narrows, but traffic continues to use it like an arterial.

General issues, speeding in the south direction, as the grade is downward from the mountains. This tends to lead to higher speeds.

General issues – with congestion, or with incident of freeways, traffic will take streets, and cut-through neighborhoods.

Grove – north of Foothill at 14th Street. Look at stop control at this location.

Question 2: Suggestions to address driving under the influence, distracted driving, excessive speeds

Education campaigns use techniques with signage or displays to demonstrate issues with DUI. Put up signs for distracted driving.

Put up wayfinding signs to help motorists navigate to destinations around mall area and other areas.

Use message boards at high school.

Add signs at city limits, signs for distracted driving. Signs saying “Put your phone Down”

3. Stakeholder Input
Omnitrans – they providing input in the questionnaire. They have issues with uneven surfaces around bus stops. Issues with bus pulling up to curbs.

San Bernardino Fire Department – issues and concerns with traffic calming devices affecting response times.

Caltrans Operations – discussion of traffic calming and use of landscaping to provide both traffic calming and aesthetics.

UUSD – issues with speed and vehicles that interfere with bus operation near schools. People making illegal turns near schools, such as near the high school at 18th Street.

3 Caltrans Director of Traffic Safety – discussed use of traffic calming to address speeding. Issue to apply the right treatment for the right type of street. FHWA has many treatments and guidelines to review.

They have examples of use. Caltrans is ready to assist with safety measures. They are working to make progress on Vision Zero – an imitative to reduce fatal and severe injury collisions. The will work with the City to identify projects for HSIP grant applications.

Measures to consider include video detection, and leading pedestrian interval.

1 Upland LRSP Stakeholder Meeting
Stakeholder Meeting 2
August 26, 2022

MEETING NOTES

Participants:

Alan French, City of Upland Anna Jaiswal, Omni Transit Sgt. Marci Williams, Police Department Lawrence Tai, City of Upland
Clyde Prem, KOA
Eric Tsay, KOA

1. Presentation of Safety Information
A study presentation was made by KOA Corporation. The presentation included information on the following:

• Review of collision analysis and stakeholder input
• Safety countermeasures
• Safety projects and effectiveness
• Recommendations

2. Safety Countermeasures
The selection of countermeasures to address collisions in Upland was reviewed. Three countermeasures are identified for signalized intersections and three countermeasures were identified for unsignalized intersections. Each countermeasure was described. Stakeholders were in agreement with the selection of countermeasures.

3. Projects
Four engineering projects were presented. These were developed to follow the format from HSIP to include project benefits related to collision reduction, project costs, and the resulting benefit-cost ratio.

In addition, non-engineering projects and programs were presented. The stakeholder group concurred with the engineering and non-engineering projects.

Sgt. Williams provided additional discussion of education and enforcement strategies. The Police Department now utilizes OTS grants. Upland PD just received grant funding from OTS for enforcement and safety for the next fiscal year. She stated that OTS also funds equipment including two portable

2 speed boards that can be put on poles. The police department also will explore bicycle safety class for all ages, partner with Upland Unified School District. The police department is involved with safety education at schools as school begins its Fall, 2022 session.

4. Process
The stakeholder group confirmed support for the project evaluation process used in the LRSP. They stated that the process identified safety issues, and the projects identified respond to the greater needs of the city. The City staff also stated that additional needs related to pedestrian and bicycle safety will be addressed in an upcoming Active Transportation Plan, where an application for funding has been made through Caltrans’ Active Transportation Program.

Roadway Safety Plan
City of Upland | April, 2022

•Provide a data driven safety plan that coordinates with a range of organizations to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on the local road system. •Create a framework to systematically identify and analyze safety problems. •Recommend safety improvements (for funding from the Caltrans HSIP).

PURPOSE OF THE ROAD SAFETY PLAN
2 Page 70 of 105

•Overview of collision data
•Safety emphasis areas
•Potential strategies
•Input

PRESENTATION OUTLINE
3 Page 71 of 105

This project reports data for a 5 year period, 2015-2019 The data is from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS)funded by California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) SWITRS contains all collisions that were reported to CHP from local and governmental agencies

COLLISION DATA
4 Page 72 of 105

TOTAL COLLISIONS –BY YEAR
5 Number of total collisions
trending down
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Fatal 2 2 6 3 1 14 3 1%
Severe Injury 8 11 9 10 2 40 8 2%
Visible Injury 143 144 104 81 69 541 108 28%
Complaint of Pain 249 279 235 183 138 1084 217 56%
Property Damage Only 58 74 49 52 33 266 53 14%
Total Collisions 460 510 403 329 243 1945 -100%
YearCollision Severity Total Average Percent

6 Page 74 of 105

COLLISION TYPE
7 Top 3 Types –Broadside, Rear End and Hit Object

8 Page 76 of 105

COLLISION CAUSE
9 The primary cause
assigned by the officer to
the collision
•Unsafe speed
•Collision in the ROW
•Traffic signals and
signs
•Improper turning
•DUI

KEY LOCATIONS
10 Determined by dollar value of crashes
Euclid Ave and 13th St.

Input
11 Page 79 of 105

Question 1: Major traffic safety locations?
12 Page 80 of 105

Question 2: Suggestions to address:

Driving Under the InfluenceDistracted DrivingDriving at excessive Speeds 13 Page 81 of 105

Question 3: Any programs that should be considered?
School education programsPublic informationOther
14 Page 82 of 105

Countdown Signal Heads
Beacon (RRFB)
Signal Visibility Vehicle Detection
Education programs:

At schools
Bike safety programs
Social media –safety messages

Other comments?
16 Page 84 of 105

NEXT STEPS
•Identify and evaluate potential safety project types at key locations •Examine non-engineering solutions to address safety education, safety enforcement and improved emergency response. 17 16th St and
Campus
Ave
7th St
and Mountain Ave

Name, Oragnization:________________________________________________________________

Upland LRSP Stakeholder Survey
The City of Upland is completing a city-wide review of traffic safety. Your input is important to understand safety concerns and issues. Thank you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire. When completed, please return this survey to [email protected].

1. What are major traffic safety issues and locations in the City of Upland? _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

2. Are there any pedestrian or bicycle safety issues or locations that you wish to identify? _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

3. Do you have any suggestions on how the city should address these collision causes? Driving under the influence? _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

Distracted driving (texting, etc.)?__________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

Driving at excessive speeds? _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

Other factors you would mention? ________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

4. Are there any other policies or programs (such as education to students, city public information or public announcements, etc.) that you feel should be developed to improve safety? _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you!

APPENDIX

CITY OF UPLAND | LRSP

Appendix B –
Total Collisions by Intersection

Intersection Collisions
Intersection Fatal
Severe
Injury
Visible
Injury
Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage
Only (PDO)
Total
Collisions Crash Costs
16TH ST & CAMPUS AV 1 14 18 4 37 5,091,600
7TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 6 31 2 40 4,978,300
13TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 13 15 2 31 4,680,000
FOOTHILL BL & REDDING WY 2 4 8 4 18 4,449,600
CAMPUS AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 8 19 6 34 4,345,300
8TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 10 12 5 28 4,050,300
FOOTHILL BL & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 6 18 2 27 3,926,600
EUCLID AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 7 16 24 3,880,500
FOOTHILL BL & MOUNTAIN AV 1 6 17 1 25 3,832,400
BENSON AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 6 13 3 23 3,535,400
ARROW HWY & MOUNTAIN AV 5 31 4 40 3,272,600
GROVE AV & LOMA SOLA AV 1 1 1 3 3,260,900
16TH ST & EUCLID AV 13 15 4 32 3,116,600
9TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 6 5 3 15 2,888,200
5TH AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 2 11 2 16 2,791,100
ARROW HWY/8TH ST & BENSON AV 9 15 5 29 2,560,700
7TH ST & EUCLID AV 7 18 4 29 2,505,500
13TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 2 7 2 12 2,467,500
17TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 4 3 2 10 2,428,500
ARROW HWY & EUCLID AV 11 10 4 25 2,427,500
2ND AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 2 6 2 11 2,386,600
12TH AV & 9TH ST 1 4 2 1 8 2,334,300
7TH ST & BENSON AV 1 1 7 1 10 2,311,900
CENTRAL AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 8 3 12 2,277,100
11TH ST & EUCLID AV 7 15 2 24 2,236,200
13TH AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 1 5 7 2,136,800
FOOTHILL BL & WILSON AV 1 2 3 6 2,117,300

MOUNTAIN AV & PACIFIC ELECTRIC
TRL 1 3 1 5 2,030,200
18TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 5 6 1,994,500
16TH ST & LAUREL AV 1 1 3 5 1,975,000
8TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 4 17 2 23 1,971,100
19TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 2 1 1 5 1,968,800
21ST ST & EUCLID AV 7 12 19 1,966,900
9TH ST & EUCLID AV 4 16 5 25 1,930,100
13TH ST & 5TH AV 1 3 1 5 1,846,000
ARROW HWY & PALM AV 8 8 3 19 1,825,500
ARROW HWY & CAMPUS AV 4 15 2 21 1,809,300
13TH AV & ARROW HWY 1 1 2 1,732,300
9TH ST & SIERRA PL 1 1 2 1,732,300

BENSON AV & MOUNTAIN SHADOW
DR 1 1 2 1,732,300
16TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 5 12 1 18 1,695,600
17TH ST & CAMPUS AV 1 1 2 1,670,900
11TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 8 6 2 16 1,650,400
BROOKDALE DR & MOUNTAIN AV 1 1 2 1,603,300

17TH ST & VALLEJO WY 1 1 1,590,000
19TH ST & LAUREL AV 1 1 1,590,000
20TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 1 1,590,000
7TH ST & FREDRICKS LN 1 1 1,590,000
AZURE CT & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 1 1,590,000
EUCLID AV & VERNON ST 1 1 1,590,000
14TH ST & EUCLID AV 7 7 14 1,562,400
ARROW HWY & SAN ANTONIO AV 5 10 1 16 1,533,800
19TH ST & CAMPUS AV 2 14 2 18 1,443,800
8TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 3 11 2 16 1,343,400
11TH ST & BENSON AV 4 8 12 1,216,400
14TH ST & CAMPUS AV 4 7 11 1,135,500
16TH ST & BENSON AV 2 10 1 13 1,106,900
FOOTHILL BL & MULBERRY AV 3 8 1 12 1,087,400
16TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 3 7 1 11 1,006,500
15TH ST & EUCLID AV 4 5 1 10 987,000
FOOTHILL BL & MONTE VISTA AV 3 6 9 912,300
3RD PL & FOOTHILL BL 4 4 8 892,800
11TH AV & ARROW HWY 1 9 10 870,400
3RD AV & ARROW HWY 2 7 1 10 864,200
9TH ST & CAMPUS AV 3 5 8 831,400
CAMPUS AV & COLONIES PKWY 4 3 1 8 825,200
ARROW RT & CENTRAL AV 1 8 1 10 802,800
2ND AV & ARROW HWY 1 8 9 789,500
11TH ST & CAMPUS AV 2 6 1 9 783,300
7TH ST & CAMPUS AV 3 4 1 8 763,800
ARROW RT & MONTE VISTA AV 3 4 1 8 763,800
16TH ST & 2ND AV 3 4 7 750,500
11TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 4 2 6 731,000
FOOTHILL BL & HOSPITAL PKWY 1 7 1 9 721,900

MOUNTAIN AV & MOUNTAIN GREEN
SHOPPING CTR 2 5 2 9 715,700
9TH ST & BENSON AV 3 3 6 669,600
20TH ST & CAMPUS AV 7 2 9 592,900
ALTA AV & FOOTHILL BL 1 5 2 8 573,400
ARROW HWY & CENTRAL AV 2 3 2 7 553,900
19TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 2 3 1 6 540,600
9TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 2 3 1 6 540,600
EUCLID AV & OLIVE ST 2 3 1 6 540,600
16TH ST & TANGLEWOOD AV 2 3 5 527,300
ARROW HWY & SHASTA WY 2 3 5 527,300
11TH ST & 3RD AV 3 1 1 5 521,100
7TH ST & SULTANA AV 2 2 4 8 499,600
ARROW HWY & SILVERWOOD AV 6 6 485,400
13TH ST & CAMPUS AV 1 4 5 465,900
15TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 4 5 465,900
14TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 2 2 1 5 459,700
16TH ST & PALOMINO AV 2 2 4 446,400
19TH ST & COLONIES PKWY 2 2 4 446,400
ARROW HWY & SAN BERNARDINO RD 2 2 4 446,400
C ST & EUCLID AV 5 5 404,500

15TH ST & CAMPUS AV 1 3 1 5 398,300
23RD ST & EUCLID AV 1 3 1 5 398,300
21ST ST & MOUNTAIN AV 2 1 2 5 392,100
2ND AV & 9TH ST 2 1 2 5 392,100
2ND AV & 7TH ST 1 3 4 385,000
8TH ST & HARRINGTON AV 1 3 4 385,000
8TH ST & SINCLAIR AV 2 1 1 4 378,800
13TH AV & 9TH ST 2 1 3 365,500
A ST & EUCLID AV 2 1 3 365,500
2ND AV & 8TH ST 4 1 5 336,900
8TH ST & CAMPUS AV 1 2 2 5 330,700
D ST & EUCLID AV 1 2 2 5 330,700
13TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 4 4 323,600
14TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 4 4 323,600
BASELINE RD & SYCAMORE HILLS PLZ 4 4 323,600
11TH ST & PALM AV 1 2 1 4 317,400
6TH AV & ARROW HWY 1 2 1 4 317,400
DEWEY WY & FOOTHILL BL 1 2 1 4 317,400
EUCLID AV & EUCLID PL 1 2 1 4 317,400
13TH ST & BENSON AV 1 2 3 304,100
15TH ST & BENSON AV 1 2 3 304,100
1ST AV & ARROW HWY 1 2 3 304,100
7TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 2 3 304,100
9TH AV & WASHINGTON BL 1 2 3 304,100
12TH AV & ARROW HWY 2 2 284,600
16TH ST & REDDING WY 2 2 284,600
21ST ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 2 2 284,600
9TH ST & GARNET WY 2 2 284,600
1ST AV & 7TH ST 3 1 4 256,000
15TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 3 3 242,700
16TH ST & CARMEL CIR EAST 3 3 242,700
17TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 3 3 242,700
CAMPUS AV & CROSSROADS DR 3 3 242,700
CAMPUS AV & F ST 3 3 242,700
11TH ST & SILVERWOOD AV 1 1 1 3 236,500
CAMPUS AV & RICHLAND ST 1 1 1 3 236,500
11TH AV & 9TH ST 1 1 2 223,200
11TH ST & 2ND AV 1 1 2 223,200
11TH ST & BERRY CT 1 1 2 223,200
11TH ST & LAUREL AV 1 1 2 223,200
13TH AV & SAN BERNARDINO RD 1 1 2 223,200
15TH ST & 2ND AV 1 1 2 223,200
16TH ST & MAYWOOD AV 1 1 2 223,200
16TH ST & WILSON AV 1 1 2 223,200
17TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 1 2 223,200
19TH ST & KELLY AV 1 1 2 223,200
1ST AV & 9TH ST 1 1 2 223,200
25TH ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 1 2 223,200
7TH ST & HARRINGTON AV 1 1 2 223,200
8TH ST & LAUREL AV 1 1 2 223,200
9TH ST & INDUSTRY WY 1 1 2 223,200

A ST & CAMPUS AV 1 1 2 223,200
ARROW HWY & LAUREL AV 1 1 2 223,200
ARROW HWY & MONTE VISTA AV 1 1 2 223,200
BENSON AV & HUNTINGTON DR 1 1 2 223,200
CAMPUS AV & RAYMOND ST 1 1 2 223,200
CAMPUS AV & WASHINGTON BL 1 1 2 223,200
LAUREL AV & VERNON DR 1 1 2 223,200
SAN ANTONIO AV & SHERIDAN ST 1 1 2 223,200
11TH ST & REDDING WY 2 1 3 175,100
13TH ST & MULBERRY AV 2 1 3 175,100
ARROW HWY & GROVE AV 2 1 3 175,100
EUCLID AV & F ST 2 1 3 175,100
11TH ST & CENTRAL AV 2 2 161,800
11TH ST & TULARE WY 2 2 161,800
13TH ST & WINSTON CT 2 2 161,800
16TH ST & FERNBROOK WY 2 2 161,800
1ST AV & 8TH ST 2 2 161,800
1ST AV & OLIVE ST 2 2 161,800
2ND AV & OLIVE ST 2 2 161,800
2ND AV & STOWELL ST 2 2 161,800
4TH AV & FOOTHILL BL 2 2 161,800
6TH AV & 9TH ST 2 2 161,800
7TH ST & BERLYN AV 2 2 161,800
7TH ST & MONTEREY AV 2 2 161,800
8TH ST & ARMSTRONG WY 1 1 2 155,600
9TH ST & VALLEJO WY 1 1 2 155,600
11TH AV & 5TH AV 1 1 142,300
11TH ST & 4TH AV 1 1 142,300
11TH ST & BIRCH AV 1 1 142,300
11TH ST & QUINCE AV 1 1 142,300
11TH ST & WEDGEWOOD AV 1 1 142,300
13TH ST & ALBRIGHT AV 1 1 142,300
13TH ST & PINE ST 1 1 142,300
16TH ST & ALBRIGHT AV 1 1 142,300
16TH ST & CAMPO AV 1 1 142,300
16TH ST & COLUMBINE WY 1 1 142,300
16TH ST & WINSTON WY 1 1 142,300
18TH ST & 2ND AV 1 1 142,300
18TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 1 142,300
18TH ST & PALOMINO AV 1 1 142,300
19TH ST & BELMAR WY 1 1 142,300
19TH ST & CROSSROADS PKWY 1 1 142,300
19TH ST & QUINCE WY 1 1 142,300
19TH ST & SAN ANTONIO ST 1 1 142,300
19TH ST & SUNKIST ST 1 1 142,300
1ST AV & F ST 1 1 142,300
22ND ST & EUCLID AV 1 1 142,300
23RD ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 1 142,300
2ND AV & MESA CT 1 1 142,300
4TH AV & A ST 1 1 142,300
5TH AV & 9TH ST 1 1 142,300

5TH AV & ARROW HWY 1 1 142,300
7TH ST & TULARE WY 1 1 142,300
7TH ST & VALLEJO WY 1 1 142,300
8TH ST & GREENTREE RD 1 1 142,300
8TH ST & MAXWELL LN 1 1 142,300
8TH ST & PALM AV 1 1 142,300
9TH ST & PALM AV 1 1 142,300
9TH ST & WISEMAN WY 1 1 142,300
ARROW HWY & HERVEY AV 1 1 142,300
ARROW RT & FAIRWOOD DR 1 1 142,300
AVALON CT & WINSTON AV 1 1 142,300
AZALEA CT & PALOMINO AV 1 1 142,300

BASELINE ST & EDISON POLE
#4304313E 1 1 142,300
BENNINGTON ST & GRAYSON WY 1 1 142,300
BENSON AV & BIRKDALE AV 1 1 142,300
BENSON AV & MILDURA AV 1 1 142,300
BIKE XING & CENTRAL AV 1 1 142,300
BOWEN ST & GROVE AV 1 1 142,300
CAMPUS AV & MESA CT 1 1 142,300
CAMPUS AV & OLIVE ST 1 1 142,300
CAMPUS AV & PORTILLO ST 1 1 142,300
CAMPUS AV & VIEW POINT ST 1 1 142,300
CEDAR CT & JUNIPER AV 1 1 142,300
COTTONWOOD ST & PINEWOOD LN 1 1 142,300
EUCLID AV & STOWELL RD 1 1 142,300
FOOTHILL BL & FOOTHILL BL 1 1 142,300

HOME DEPOT CENTER DR &
MOUNTAIN AV 1 1 142,300
LINDEN CT & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 1 142,300

MONTE VISTA AV & PACIFIC ELECTRIC
TRL 1 1 142,300
MOUNTAIN AV & PARK BL 1 1 142,300
MULBERRY AV & SPRINGFIELD ST 1 1 142,300
RANDY ST & W RANDY ST 1473 1 1 142,300
REDDING WY & WINN DR 1 1 142,300
SAN ANTONIO AV & VERNON ST 1 1 142,300
SANDRA CT & WEDGEWOOD AV 1 1 142,300
16TH ST & ORANGEWOOD AV 1 1 2 94,200
20TH ST & EUCLID AV 1 1 2 94,200
3RD AV & A ST 1 1 2 94,200
9TH ST & SHASTA WY 1 1 2 94,200
ARROW HWY & CORTE BLANCO 1 1 2 94,200
CENTRAL AV & HUNTINGTON DR 1 1 2 94,200
CHAFFEE ST & GROVE AV 1 1 2 94,200
FOOTHILL BL & GROVE AV 1 1 2 94,200
ORCHID CT & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 1 2 94,200
10TH AV & MOUNTAIN AV 1 1 80,900
11TH AV & 8TH ST 1 1 80,900
11TH ST & 5TH AV 1 1 80,900
11TH ST & BRENTWOOD AV 1 1 80,900

13TH ST & ALBRIGHT AV ALLEY 1 1 80,900
13TH ST & QUINCE AV 1 1 80,900
14TH AV & 9TH AV 1 1 80,900
14TH AV & 9TH ST 1 1 80,900
14TH ST & 2ND AV 1 1 80,900
14TH ST & ALBRIGHT AV 1 1 80,900
14TH ST & EDGEFIELD AV 1 1 80,900
14TH ST & WINSTON CT 1 1 80,900
15TH ST & GROVE AV 1 1 80,900
15TH ST & UKIAH WY 1 1 80,900
15TH ST & WEDGEWOOD AV 1 1 80,900
16TH ST & DEWEY WY 1 1 80,900
16TH ST & FERNBROOK AV 1 1 80,900
16TH ST & UPLAND HILLS DR 1 1 80,900
17TH ST & REDDING WY 1 1 80,900
19TH ST & 3RD AV 1 1 80,900
19TH ST & ELOISE WY 1 1 80,900
19TH ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 1 80,900
19TH ST & SHOPPING CENTER DR 1 1 80,900
1ST AV & G ST 1 1 80,900
21ST ST & CAMPUS AV 1 1 80,900
21ST ST & SEABROOK AV 1 1 80,900
21ST ST & TULARE CT 1 1 80,900
22ND ST & MOUNTAIN AV 1 1 80,900
23RD ST & OMALLEY AV 1 1 80,900
23RD ST & SAN ANTONIO AV 1 1 80,900
24TH ST & 24TH ST 1 1 80,900
2ND AV & C ST 1 1 80,900
2ND AV & F ST 1 1 80,900
2ND AV & OLIVE AV 1 1 80,900
3RD AV & 8TH ST 1 1 80,900
7TH ST & SINCLAIR AV 1 1 80,900
7TH ST & VAN NESS AV 1 1 80,900
7TH ST & WHITE AV 1 1 80,900
8TH ST & GENOA WY 1 1 80,900
8TH ST & LINDA WY 1 1 80,900
8TH ST & SCE POLE #1377763E 1 1 80,900
9TH AV & 9TH ST 1 1 80,900
9TH ST & BODENHAMER 1 1 80,900
9TH ST & CAMPUS ST 1 1 80,900
9TH ST & CENTRAL AV 1 1 80,900
9TH ST & GROVE AV 1 1 80,900
9TH ST & VISTA PL 1 1 80,900
ARROW HWY & LOMA PL 1 1 80,900
ARROW RT & COLLEGE COMMERCE WY 1 1 80,900
ARROW RT & LOMA PL 1 1 80,900
ARROW RT & MOUNTAIN AV 1 1 80,900
BASELINE RD & CENTRAL AV 1 1 80,900

BASELINE RD & PARK VIEW
PROMENADE 1 1 80,900