Upland City Council
May 13, 2024

y•�� . CI UPLAND
t:
, "Fhe Cary of. Graciou.ti 1.1inng '

EETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
!.:71fdtePteA/
Rill Velto, Mayor
James Breitling, Mayor Pro Tern- District 2 Michael Blay, City Manager Carlos A. Garcia,Councilmember-District 3 Stephen P. Deitsch,City Attorney Shannon Maust, Councilmember -District I Keri Johnson, City Clerk Rudy Zuniga,Councilmember-District 4
Monday, May 13, 2024
Open session begins at 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
City Hall, 460 N. Euclid Avenue
Residents may observe the City Council meetings remotely via livestream on the City website, Spectrum Cable TV Channel 3, or Frontier Cable TV Channel 26.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

2. ADDITIONS-DELETIONS TO AGENDA

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is a time for any citizen to comment on item listed on the closed session agenda only. Anyone wishing to address the legislative body is requested to submit a speaker card to the City Clerk at or prior to speaking. The speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than three (3) minutes. The use of visual aids will be included in the time limit.

4. CLOSED SESSION

5. INVOCATION
Rahmi Mowjood, Middle Ground Muslim Center

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7. PRESENTATIONS
Presentation from CalCities on the Upcoming Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act on the November Ballot
Presentation of Certificates of Completion to the Upland Community Emergency Response Team (CERT)
Proclamation declaring May 2024 as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Awareness Month

8. CITY ATTORNEY

9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

This is a time for any citizen to comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.

Anyone wishing to address the legislative body is requested to submit a speaker card to the City Clerk at or prior to speaking. The speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Speakers will be given five (5) minutes during public hearings. The use of visual aids will be included in the time limit. Public comments and questions for the purpose of hearing current matters of concern in our community and to provide citizens a method for the public to hear those concerns in an open venue is encouraged. However, under the provisions of the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from discussion of items not listed on the agenda, and therefore, the City Council, City Manager, or City Attorney will take communications under advisement for consideration and appropriate response or discussion at a later time.

Individuals who demonstrate disruptive conduct during City Council meetings that prevent the City Council from conducting its meeting in an orderly manner are guilty of a misdemeanor as stated in PC403, disrupting a public meeting, and are subject to removal from the chamber or arrest.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the legislative body request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Consent Calendar
a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7
Recommended Action:

Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of April 22, 2024. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson)
b. 2ND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1987 OMNIBUS 12

ORDINANCE
CEQA: Not a project
Recommended Action:

Hold 2nd reading by title only, waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1987 amending various sections of the Upland Municipal Code as specified. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson)
c. 2ND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1988 AMENDING 16 UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.36 AND REPEALING UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.44
CEQA: Not a project.

Recommended Action:

Hold 2nd reading by title only, waive further reading, and adopt Ordinance No. 1988 amending Upland Municipal Code Section 12.36 and repealing Section

12.44 of Title 12 of the Upland Municipal Code to establish a central location for rules relating to the use of City parks. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker) d. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE TO AN EXISTING PURCHASE 30

ORDER WITH 10-8 RETROFIT
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Approve an increase to the existing purchase order with 10-8 Retrofit by $62,000 for a total purchase order amount of $95,000; and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis) e. CONSIDER AWARD OF BID FOR PROJECT NO. 82347, PD AIR HANDLER 31 REPLACEMENT (BID NO. 2024-03)
CEQA: Determined to be categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA guidelines.

Recommended Action:

Approve the plans and specifications for Project No. 82347; award the construction contract to F.M. Thomas Air Conditioning, Inc., in the amount of $392,326; and approve a construction contingency in the amount of $82,674, for a total amount of$475,000. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis) f. CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF THE CALRECYCLE USED OIL PAYMENT 33 PROGRAM (OPP CYCLE 14) GRANT
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Accept the CalRecycle Used Oil Payment Cycle 14 Grant Award of $11,080 and appropriate the funding to the FY 2023/24 Solid Waste fund. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis)
g. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A PURCHASE ORDER INCREASE FOR WEST 36 COAST ARBORISTS.

CEQA: Determined to be Categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c) (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA guidelines.

Recommended Action:

Approve a budget amendment and approve an increase to an existing Purchase Order with West Coast Arborists in the amount of $83,645 for a total purchase order amount of $1,083,645, to cover unforeseen tree related projects/reports for the current fiscal year. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis)
h. CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 20151 38 CEQA: Not a project.

Recommended Action:

Accept the improvements for Tract Map 20151 and release the improvement bonds. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis)
i. CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 20366 56 CEQA: Final Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration is in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15074 and 15162.

Recommended Action:

Accept the improvements for Tract Map 20366 and reduce the improvement bonds to 25%. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis)
j. CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF THE HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM 75 (HMGP) FY 2023-24 GRANT AWARD
CEQA: Not a Project
Recommended Action:

Accept the CalEOS Hazard Mitigation Grant Program award of $85,427.91 and appropriate the funding to Fund 217. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker) k. CONSIDER AN AWARD OF BID FOR PROJECT NO. 83003, OLIVEDALE PARK 81 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION.

CEQA: Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15302 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Recommended Action:

Approve a construction contract for the replacement of the playground at Olivedale Park in the amount of $115,300 and approve a construction contingency in the amount of $23,060, for a total amount of $138,360. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)
I. CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND 83

CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM EQUIPMENT REBATE

VOUCHER AWARD
CEQA: Not a Project
Recommended Action:

Accept the U.S. Department of Energy Program Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Equipment Rebate Voucher award for $134,030 and appropriate the funding to Fund 425. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)
m. CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN 87

EMPLOYMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
CEQA: Not a Project
Recommended Action:

Adopt a Resolution authorizing participation in Employment Risk Management Authority. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)
n. CONSIDER SUPPORT OF A 15-YEAR FRESH START WITH CALPERS 91 CEQA: Not a Project
Recommended Action:

Support staff's inclusion of a 15-year Fresh Start with CaIPERS in conjunction with the upcoming 2-year budget. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF GPA-23-03, ZC-23-03, DPR-23-0012, AND CA-23- 95 17 FOR THE ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A HISTORIC DWELLING LOCATED AT 1010 N. EUCLID AVENUE

CEQA: Determine to be Exempt
Recommended Action:

The City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider approval of GPA-23- 0003, ZC-23-0003, DPR-23-0012, and CA-23-0017, located at 1010 N. Euclid Avenue. (Staff Person: Robert Dalquest)

1. Staff Presentation

2. Hold Public Hearing

3. Close Public Hearing

4. Adopt a Resolution that General Plan Amendment No. 23-0003, Zone Change No. 23-0003, Development Plan Review No. 23-0012, and Certificate of Appropriateness No. 23-0017 is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule), Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines

5. Adopt a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 23-0003 to amend the land use designation of one 8,685 square foot parcel located at 1010 N. Euclid Avenue from Single-Family Medium (SFR-M) to Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use (C/R-MU)

6. Hold first reading by title only, waive further reading, and introduce an Ordinance (Zone Change No. 23-0003), to amend the zoning designation of one 8.685 square foot parcel located at 1010 N. Euclid Avenue from Single-Family Medium (RS-7.5) to Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use (C/R-MU)

7. Adopt a Resolution approving Development Plan Review No. 23-0013 and Certificate of Appropriateness No. CA-23-0017 to adaptively reuse an existing 2,526 square foot historic single-family residence as a professional office, and construct supporting commercial improvements including a paved parking lot and landscaping improvements, located within the City's designated Euclid Avenue historic district, at 1010 N.

Euclid Avenue

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING, TRAINING, OR

CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE
Councilmembers will provide oral reports on any meetings, trainings, or conferences they attended on behalf of the City. This item is for information only. b. SPECIAL PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING, APRIL 30, 2024 171 The Committee Chairperson will report on the meeting. This is an information item only.

13. BUSINESS ITEMS
a. UPDATE ON THE DOWNTOWN UPLAND PARKLETS PROJECT 176 CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Receive and file this update on the Downtown Upland Parklets Project. (Staff Person: Robert Da!quest)

14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS

15. CITY MANAGER

16. ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is Tuesday, May 28, 2024.

NOTE: If you challenge the public hearing(s) or the related environmental determinations in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Upland, at, or prior to, the public hearing.

All Agenda items and back-up materials are available for public review at the Upland Public Library, at 450 North Euclid Avenue, the City Clerk's Office at 460 North Euclid Avenue and the City website at www.uplandca.gov .

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office, 909-931-4120.

Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II] On May 8, 2024 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at 450 N. Euclid Avenue (Upland Public Library) and 460 N. Euclid Avenue (Upland City Hall), and the City website at www.uplandca.gov

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE UPLAND CITY COUNCIL April 22, 2024
6:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
City Hall, 460 N. Euclid Avenue
Members Present: Mayor Bill Velto (arrived at 6:12 p.m.), Councilmember James Breitling, Councilmember Carlos A. Garcia, Councilmember Shannan Maust, Councilmember Rudy Zuniga
Staff Present: City Manager Michael Blay, City Attorney Stephen P. Deitsch, City Clerk Keri Johnson

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The regular meeting of the Upland City Council was called to order by Mayor Pro Tern Breitling at 6:03 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Upland City Hall.

2. ADDITIONS-DELETIONS TO AGENDA
None.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.

4. CLOSED SESSION

5. INVOCATION
Deacon Richard Simpson, St.Anthony's Catholic Church

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Jim Thomas, with ASL interpretation provided by Claremont International Language School

7. PRESENTATIONS

8. CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Deitsch stated he had no reports.

9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A number of individuals spoke regarding deferred maintenance issues of the snack bar building for Upland American Little League at Citrus Park. They cited water damage, mold issues, loss of revenue for the league, and construction at surrounding parks while the snack bar remains in disrepair. The following spoke:

Tommy Brooks, Upland Mallory Cervantes, Upland Sandy Preciado, Upland Tim Payan, Upland
1

Lani Foland, Upland Eli Cervantez, Upland
Daniella Badeau, Upland Violet Badeau, Upland
Jon Dunn, Upland Maximus Castro, Upland
Cynthia Castro, Upland Jarvis Badeau, Upland
Eddie Cervantes, Upland Marissa Tucker, Upland
Jay Uballez, Upland
Natasha Walton, People for Upland Parks, thanked the City for hosting the earth day event and spoke in opposition of the license agreement for Parcel Map 20269 stating it would cause unnecessary wear and tear on the access road.

Gary Schwary, Upland, stated that he is honored to Chair the Community Development Block Grant Committee (CDBG) and he encouraged Upland American Little League to apply for CDBG grant funding in the future.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Maust removed Consent Calendar Item 10b and Councilmember Zuniga removed Consent Calendar 10f for separate action.

Moved by: Councilmember Garcia
Seconded by: Councilmember Breitling
Approve the Consent Calendar
Motion: Carried Unanimously
a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of April 8, 2024.
c. ANNUAL DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS
Adopt Resolution No. 6768 authorizing and directing the City Clerk to destroy certain City records pursuant to the Government Code of the State of California. d. MICROSOFT SERVER SOFTWARE LICENSES WITH SOFTWARE

ASSURANCE
Authorize the City Manager to approve a purchase order to acquire Microsoft Server Software Licenses with Software Assurance for 3 Years through a Microsoft Select Agreement with DELL Technologies.
e. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A 2ND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH

JL GROUP, LLC WORKPLACE SOLUTIONS
Approve the second amendment to the original agreement with JL Group, LLC Workplace Solutions for workplace investigation services; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.
g. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ADVANTEC, INC.

Approve Amendment No. 2 to the agreement with ADVANTEC Consulting Engineers, Inc., increasing the annual contract amount by $24,000 for a total 2

amount of$174,000 for FY 23/24; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.
h. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF MARCH WARRANT AND PAYROLL REGISTERS Approve the March warrant registers (check numbers 47067-47513 and direct disbursements totaling $11,594,267.62) and payroll registers totaling $1,833,383.16 (check numbers 163752-163758 and electronic fund transfers 46390-47073).

TREASURER'S REPORT MARCH 2024
Receive and file the March 2024 Treasurer's Report.
b. ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE CITIZEN

ADVISORY MEMBER
Council thanked Cary Leach for his service on the committee and wished him well in his retirement.

Moved by: Councilmember Maust
Seconded by: Councilmember Zuniga
Accept the resignation from Public Works Citizen Advisory Member Cary Leach and direct the City Clerk to post the notice of unscheduled vacancy.

Motion: Carried Unanimously
f. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 20269
City Attorney Deitsch clarified the property associated with the license agreement and the terms of the agreement and answered questions posed by the Council.

Development Services Director Dalquest clarified the use of the road for the project.

Moved by: Councilmember Zuniga
Seconded by: Councilmember Garcia
Approve the License Agreement for Parcel Map 20269 and authorize execution and recordation of said agreement.

Motion: Carried Unanimously
At 7:01 p.m. Mayor Velto called a recess. The Council reconvened in open session at 7:12 p.m.

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM YEAR 2024-25

ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
Housing Coordinator Avalos presented the staff report and introduced Committee Chairperson Schwary who presented the committee's recommendations for the 2024-25 Annual Action Plan.
2

Mayor Velto opened the public hearing
Daniella Badeau, requested information on the application process and questioned the administration costs included in the Annual Action Plan.

There being no other speakers, Mayor Velto closed the public hearing.

Moved by: Councilmember Garcia
Seconded by: Councilmember Breitling
Adopt Resolution No. 6769 approving the City of Upland Program (PY) 2024-25 Annual Action Plan and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all necessary related documents to implement the PY 2024-25 AAP.

Motion: Carried Unanimously

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING, TRAINING, OR

CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE
No reports.

13. BUSINESS ITEMS
a. CONSIDERATION OF AN OMNIBUS ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS

SECTIONS OF THE UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE
City Clerk Johnson presented the staff report.

Moved by: Councilmember Maust
Seconded by: Councilmember Breitling
Hold first reading by title only, waive further reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 1987 amending various sections of the Upland Municipal Code as specified.

Motion: Carried Unanimously
b. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.36 AND REPEALING UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 12.44
Recreation and Community Services Manager Jessica Gandara presented the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation and answered questions posed by the Council.

Moved by: Councilmember Garcia
Seconded by: Councilmember Maust
Hold first reading by title only, waive further reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 1988 amending Upland Municipal Code Section 12.36 and repealing Section

12.44 of Title 12 of the Upland Municipal Code to establish a central location for rules relating to the use of City parks.

Motion: Carried Unanimously
3

c. AB1600 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ANNUAL REPORTS
Assistant City Manager presented the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation.

Moved by: Councilmember Breitling
Seconded by: Councilmember Zuniga
Receive and file the attached AB1600 Development Impact Fee annual reports and approve the proposed transfers.

Motion: Carried Unanimously

14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmembers announced various activities and events throughout the community and reported on their attendance at the League of California Cities Conference.

15. CITY MANAGER

16. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Velto adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is Monday, May 13, 2024.

Keri Johnson, City Clerk
4

G 4,pF Up o CIS UPLAND
S
C�� "TheCity of Gracious Lining"°�� o&�t° tan' SECOND GIs" '�u, .dnING AND
DATE: April 22,2024 Da to 'q DOPT I oN TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL2t4 Item No IOi
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:KERI JOHNSON,CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN OMNIBUS ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF

THE UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council hold first reading by title only, waive further reading, and introduce an Ordinance amending various sections of the Upland Municipal Code as specified.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of ensuring that the Upland Municipal Code is consistent with State Law and complements current City practices,regulations,and policies.

BACKGROUND
The Upland Municipal Code requires periodic updates to ensure consistency with City policies and State Law, to improve clarity,and to better serve the public. An omnibus ordinance is the packaging of a collection of amendments relatively small in scale and having a limited scope of impact,into one"omnibus"ordinance. The City Clerk's office coordinates this process for all departments annually.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Staff has identified several provisions in the Upland Municipal Code(UMC)requiring review and revision. As part of this review process,the City Clerk worked with other departments and the City Attorney to review and consider the proposed changes. The following provides the Council an overview of the proposed changes:
• Amending Section 1.22.070 to add a paragraph regarding the City's compliance with California Building Standards Code Section 1.8.8.1.
• Amending Chapter 2.02.070 to clarify that the amendment to Section 2.02.040,"Salaries,"adopted in 2023, will not go into effect until after the November 2024 General Municipal Election. • Amending Section 2.04.020 to remove the requirement that the City Manager reside in the City of Upland. • Removing Sections 2.28.030 and 2.28.040 of Chapter 2.28 regarding the library fund. These funds were transferred to the Upland Community Foundation when the organization was founded in 1995.

All proposed revisions are included in a redline attachment for ease of reference.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The fiscal impact is limited to the publication of the Ordinance summaries and codification of the Ordinance into the Upland Municipal Code. These costs have been included in the City Clerk's operating budget and no additional appropriation is necessary.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

ORDINANCE NO. 1987

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF

THE UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE AS SPECIFIED
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the California Constitution and Government Code section 37100, the legislative body of a city may pass ordinances not in conflict with the Constitution and the laws of the State or the United States; and
WHEREAS, every year, City Staff conducts an annual review of the Upland Municipal Code in order to ensure that the Upland Municipal Code remains consistent with current law, City policies, and practices; and
WHEREAS, City staff and the City Attorney have reviewed the Upland Municipal Code and have determined that certain updates to the Upland Municipal Code should be implemented; and
WHEREAS, the proposed revisions are detailed in the Staff Report and indicated in the redline document provided to the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. Amendment of Section 1.22.070. Section 1.22.070 of Chapter

1.22 of Title 1 of the Upland Municipal Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"1.22.070 Hearing officer.

The city manager's designee shall establish procedures for the selection of a hearing officer required in this chapter. A hearing officer shall be a neutral third party contracted by the city and selected in a manner that avoids the potential for any bias against any parties to the hearing. The hearing officer's compensation, if any, shall be paid by the city; however, the non-prevailing party shall be liable to the city for the costs of the hearing and the hearing officer's compensation. The hearing officer's compensation shall not be directly or indirectly conditioned upon the outcome of the hearing.

The City of Upland complies with California Building Standards Code 1.8.8.1.

The City of Upland has established a process to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions, and determinations made by the City relative to the application and interpretations of the California Building Standards Code and other regulations governing construction, use, maintenance and change of occupancy. The City of Upland has established an appeals board, the members of which are not employees of the enforcing agency and are knowledgeable in the applicable building codes, regulations, and ordinances as determined by the governing body of the City. (Ord. 1936 § 3, 2020)

Ordinance No. 1987

Section 3. Amendment of Section 2.02.070. Section 2.02.070 of Chapter

2.02 of Title 2 of the Upland Municipal Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"2.02.070 Salaries—Operative date.

The salary provisions of this chapter shall become operative only on and after the date upon which one or more members of the council become eligible for the salary prescribed herein by virtue of beginning a new term of office following the November 2024, general municipal election. (Prior code § 2200.6)"
Section 4. Amendment of Section 2.04.020. Section 2.04.020 of Chapter

2.04 of Title 2 of the Upland Municipal Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"2.04.020 Residence.

Residence in the city of a person as city manager shall not be required as a condition of appointment. (Prior code § 2310.020)"
Section 5. Removal of Sections 2.28.030 and 2.28.040. Sections 2.28.030 and 2.28.040 of Chapter 2.28 of Title 2 of the Upland Municipal Code are hereby removed in their entirety.

Section 6. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

Further, if the activity is deemed a project this City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from its adoption.

Section 9. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Upland, pursuant to all legal requirements.

Ordinance No. 1987

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 2024.

Bill Velto, Mayor
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland held on the 22nd day of April, 2024, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland on the 13th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

4 or U-2
,� ti
°� CYUPLAND
I The City of Gracious Living"
AI
�9LtPOR4
°. Staineroiit

4.., ,,
Ord No iiit_E� 1,G AND AD DATE: April 22,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Da to 5 I' Ire�PT I ON FROM: MICHAEL BLAY, CITY MANAGER No•I b� PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

JESSICA GANDARA,RECREATION&COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.36 AND REPEALING UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.44 RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council hold first reading by title only, waive further reading, and introduce an Ordinance amending Upland Municipal Code Section 12.36 and repealing Section 12.44 of Title 12 of the Upland Municipal Code to establish a central location for rules relating to the use of City parks.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of maintaining order, enhancing public safety,and allowing the public to enjoy free public parks.

BACKGROUND
In late 2023,a request for updated signage was made,which resulted in a review of the Upland Municipal Code as it pertains to City parks. Recreation and Community Services staff reviewed the code and collaborated with Upland Police Department staff to ensure appropriate language was added and that the code was organized appropriately and efficiently.

At the December 6,2023 meeting of the City Council Advisory Committee and the February 6,2024 meeting of the Parks, Arts, Recreation, and Community Services (PARCS) Advisory Committee, staff presented potential modifications to signage in parks citywide. The feedback from both committees was positive and included additional recommendations for signage in various areas of City parks.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
In an effort to address a variety of park-related issues and to bring organization and efficiency to the Upland Municipal Code sections related to public parks, staff recommends the amendment of Chapter 12.36 (Use of City Skate Park Facilities)and the repealing of Chapter 12.44(Reservation System for Park Facilities).

While Chapter 12.36 was written with the City's skate park in mind,the language throughout the chapter is relevant to parks in general.Chapter 12.44 relates to reserved use of park facilities,which can easily be merged with the chapter that addresses general park regulations.

With Council's approval, the ordinance will add to the chapter's definitions, differentiate between general park use and reserved use for park facilities, adds a comprehensive list of regulations including prohibiting firearms and dangerous weapons, damaging property or land, retrieving water from park sources, fires and fireplaces, smoking, controlled substances,and alcohol,amplified sound,solicitation,camping,and storing personal property.

If the Ordinance is adopted,City staff will replace current signage with the updated language and design after it goes into effect. Additional signage would be strategically placed to ensure patrons have another opportunity to view the rules and regulations of the parks.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA.The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
If approved, it is estimated that signage citywide would be less than $5,000. These amendments do not require additional patrol enforcement. In the case of enforcement,revenue will be generated using current fine schedules.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project

ORDINANCE NO. 1988

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
UPLAND, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 12.36 AND
REPEALING CHAPTER 12.44 OF TITLE 12 OF THE UPLAND

MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A CENTRAL LOCATION

FOR RULES RELATING TO THE USE OF CITY PARKS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the California Constitution and Government Code section 37100, the legislative body of a city may pass ordinances not in conflict with the Constitution and the laws of the State or the United States; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to ensure that the public has fair access to the City's parks and facilities therein, and to ensure that the parks and their facilities are maintained in good working condition; and
WHEREAS, at present rules relating to the use of City parks are found throughout the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the consolidation of these rules into one Chapter of the Municipal Code will make the Code easier to use for both staff and the general public.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. Chapter 12.36 of Title 12 of the Upland Municipal Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"Chapter 12.36 USE OF CITY PARK FACILITIES

12.36.010 Purpose.

12.36.020 Definitions.

12.36.030 Reserved use of parks and special events.

12.36.040 Park hours.

12.36.050 Park regulations, generally.

12.36.060 Designated skateboard/ skating areas.

12.36.070 Liability in connection with use of skateboard/skating areas.

12.36.080 Regulations applicable to the use of designated skateboard/skating areas.

12.36.090 Signs required.

12.36.100 Violations, penalties and enforcement.

12.36.010 Purpose.

Ordinance No. 1988

It is the purpose of this Chapter to ensure that the public has fair access to the City of Upland's parks and facilities therein, to establish regulations for the safe use of parks within the City, and to ensure that the parks and their facilities are maintained in good working condition.

12.36.020 Definitions.

For the purposes of this Chapter, words, phrases and terms used herein shall have their ordinary meaning, unless otherwise provided as follows:
"Amplified sound" means music, sound wave, vibration, or speech projected or transmitted by electronic equipment, including amplifiers. "City" means the City of Upland
"Council" means the City Council of the City of Upland, or any person authorized by the Council, pursuant to law, to act in its stead.
"Designee" means any employee of the City of Upland authorized to made decisions or act on behalf of the City of Upland.
"Director" means any Department Head of the City of Upland. "Exclusive Use" means the right to physically occupy the park facility and use personal property in park facilities during the permitted time, free from the interference of others.
"General Park Use" means patrons accessing park amenities such as buildings, playgrounds, picnic areas, athletic facilities, or passive grass areas that are open to anyone without prior reservation.
"Park" or "Designated Park" means any community park, neighborhood park, nature park, special use facility, athletic facilities, park amenity, or other area identified by the City as a park. The term "park" includes the entire area of the park which includes, but is not limited to parking lots, walkways, restrooms, facilities, buildings, gazebos, playgrounds, passive grass areas, athletic fields or courts, slopes, greenbelts, bio swale, wet or dry creeks, and landscape areas.
"Peace Officer" shall have the same meaning as Section 830 of the California Penal Code.
"Permit" means a document issued by the City of Upland authorizing the permittee to use park facilities."
"Permittee" means the person, group, entity, corporation, or association to whom a permit is issued and shall include any individual accompanying the person, group, entity, corporation, or association.

Ordinance No. 1988

"Reserved use" means patrons accessing park amenities such as buildings, playgrounds, picnic areas, athletic facilities, or passive grass areas exclusively (permit required) for one or more occasions.
"Roller skates" or "in-line skates," including Rollerblades, means any shoe, boot or other footwear to which one or more wheels are attached. "Skateboard" means any platform of any composition or size to which two or more wheels four inches or less in diameter are attached, which is intended to be ridden or propelled by one or more persons standing or kneeling upon it, and to which there is not affixed any seat or any other device or mechanism to turn or control the wheels. "Skateboard/skating area" means a public skateboard park as that term is used in California Health and Safety Code Section 115800(d)(1), or any successor provision thereto, and includes any facility, structure or area designated by resolution of the city council as a skateboard/skating area in which skateboarding, in-line skating and/or roller skating is permitted pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. "Trespass Notice" means a written notice issued by City staff or a peace officer to any person found to be in violation of Section 12.36.030. The trespass notice shall indicate that the person's presence at the specific park facilities without a valid permit is unlawful and require that the person vacate the park facility immediately. "Unmanned Aircraft" means an aircraft without a human pilot onboard, that is controlled from an operator on the ground, and operates without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft. "Vehicle" means any device by which any person or property may be propelled, moved, or drawn, excepting a device moved by human power, including but not limited to cars, trucks, trailers, recreation vehicles, golf carts, all-terrain vehicles (ATV), off-road motor bicycles, motorized scooters, electric bicycles, or other power- driven mobility devices.
"Vehicular Travel" means to move in a given direction or path through a given distance by way of a vehicle.
"Wildlife" means undomesticated animals living in the wild including, but not limited to coyotes, raccoons, deer, opossums, feral cats, geese, ducks, foxes, squirrels, snakes, rats, mice, fish, and turtles.

12.36.030 Reserved use of parks and special events.

A. Except as provided in this Chapter, and elsewhere in this Municipal Code or the policies adopted in furtherance thereof, use of all Park and park facilities will be based on a first come, first served basis for General Park Use. No Permit is required for this purpose.

Ordinance No. 1988

B. The use, Exclusive Use, and Reserved Use of Parks and park facilities may be subject to reservation and permit fees and policies, administrative regulations, and procedures including, but not limited to the City's Athletic Facilities Policy, Picnic Area Reservation Policy, Facility Use Policy, and any other Parks use policies that may be adopted by the City Council from time to time.

C. The City Council is authorized to designate by resolution certain Parks within the City that require a Permit to use the park facilities therein. The City Council is authorized to set the amount of fees for these Permits by resolution.

D. All persons desiring to use park facilities in designated Parks must first obtain a Permit pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter and present the Permit to any peace officer or member of City staff upon request.

E. Any person desiring Exclusive Use of park facilities in non-designated Parks may, prior to the use, obtain a Permit pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. The permittee must present the Permit to any peace officer or member of City staff upon request in order to establish his or her right to Exclusive Use of park facilities.

F. In a designated park, it is unlawful for a person to do any of the following:
a. Occupy or use park facilities without having first obtained a permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
b. Occupy or use park facilities at any time other than the date and time specified in the permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. c. Occupy or use park facilities during the time and date that a Permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter has been issued to another person. d. Fail to present a valid Permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter to any requesting peace officer or member of City staff while occupying or using park facilities.

G. In a non-designated park, it is unlawful for any person to interfere with, intrude upon, or use the park facilities specified in a Permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter belonging to another person during the time and date stated in the Permit.

H. All persons desiring a permit to use facilities at designated or non-designated parks must:
a. Complete the permit request form provided by the City. b. Present a current form of identification.

Ordinance No. 1988

c. Pay the required fees and deposits that may be established by resolution of the City Council.

Denials of permit requests shall be in a writing that states the reason(s) for the denial and the procedures for appealing the denial.

I. Any person who violates the provisions of this Section and following issuance of a Trespass Notice, refuses to vacate the Park, designated park, or park facility shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to affect, supersede or otherwise prevent private causes of action for trespass or other civil, penal or administrative prosecution for trespass or maintaining a nuisance under state or local statute or ordinance.

12.36.040 Park hours.

The regulation of Park hours is established and set forth in Section 9.04.090 of this Municipal Code.

12.36.050 Park regulations, generally.

A. Firearms, Deadly or Dangerous Weapons, and BB Devices. The use and possession of firearms, deadly or dangerous weapons, and BB devices in Parks and at park facilities is prohibited (with exceptions) and regulated in accordance with Chapter 9.24 of this Municipal Code.

B. Operations of Vehicles
a. Roads for Public Use - The provisions of the California Vehicle Code are applicable in the City parks with respect to any way or place of whatever nature is publicly maintained and open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel.

All violations of such Vehicle Code shall be enforced and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions thereof.
b. Surfaces Other than Roads for Public Use - No person shall drive or otherwise operate a vehicle including golf carts, all-terrain vehicles (ATV), off-road motor bicycles, and similar vehicles in a park upon surfaces other than those maintained and open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel as regulated in accordance with Chapter 8.44.110 of this Municipal Code. c. The parking of vehicles in Parks between the hours of 3:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. or for more than 72 consecutive hours is prohibited and is subject to regulation under Subsection 0 of Section 10.36.040 of this Municipal Code.

C. Unmanned Aircraft and Toy Vehicles
a. Unmanned Aircrafts including, but not limited to drones, model or toy airplanes, helicopters, or similar devices are permitted at all parks. When operating

Ordinance No. 1988

Unmanned Aircraft within parks, no person shall takeoff or land an Unmanned Aircraft under the following circumstances:
i. Outside of the person's visual line of sight.
ii. Within twenty-five (25) feet of another individual, except the operator or the operator's designee.
iii. Within five hundred (500) feet of any City-permitted events open to the public.
iv. With any type of weapon, device, instrument, material, or substance, animate or inanimate, that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, attached to it. v. In a reckless manner so as to create a substantial risk of serious injury to any person or substantial risk of damage to the property of another.
b. Gas powered remote-controlled vehicles including but not limited to toy or model cars, trucks, watercrafts, and similar toys are prohibited at all Parks and park facilities.

D. Damaging Property
a. It is unlawful and a misdemeanor, subject to punishment in accordance with Section 1.16.010 et seq. of this Code, for any person to damage any Park or park facility amenity.
b. No person shall mark, write upon, paint, deface, pluck, pull up, cut, take, or remove any building, tree, shrub, bush, plant, flower, rock, cage, pen, monument, fence, bench, or other structure apparatus, or property at a Park. c. No person shall build or add or remove features, structures, or buildings at a Park without permit approval through the City.
d. Notwithstanding the above, the prohibitions set forth in this section do not apply to City, animal control, fire, and law enforcement personnel in the pursuit of their duties.

E. Damaging Land. It is unlawful and a misdemeanor, subject to punishment in accordance with Section 1.16.010 of this Code, for any person to cut, dig, or remove any tree, wood, turf, grass, soil, rock, sand, gravel, or fertilizer at any Park or park facility, except by City personnel in pursuit of their duties.

F. Water. No person shall connect to and retrieve water from any source at a Park including, but not limited to drinking fountains, sprinklers, and fire hydrants, animal control, fire, and law enforcement personnel in the pursuit of their duties.

Ordinance No. 1988

G. Fires and Fireplaces. No person shall kindle a fire in any Park except in fireplaces provided for that purpose or in barbecues approved by the City Manager, except by permission of the City Manager or designee.

H. Waste Liquids and Refuse. In accordance with Section 9.04.070 of this Municipal Code, no person shall urinate, defecate, or dispose of items, including but not limited to salt water, biohazardous materials, or other waste liquids, garbage, cans, bottles, papers, or other refuse, in any park or park facility, except that garbage may be disposed of in the waste receptacles provided for that purpose.

I. Smoking Prohibited. Smoking, including, but not limited to, the use of any electronic smoking device, is prohibited in all Parks in accordance with Chapter 9.60 of this Municipal Code.

J. Controlled Substances. The provisions of the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act are applicable in Parks and shall be enforced and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of such Act. In addition, Chapter 9.48 regulates the use of marijuana and Chapter 9.52 regulates the sale and use of synthetic drugs within Parks.

K. Alcohol Use and Intoxication. Except for written pre-approval from the City Manager and/or Police Chief, the use of alcohol in Parks is prohibited. The general use of alcohol and intoxication in Parks are regulated under Chapter 9.16 of this Municipal Code.

L. Restrictions Upon Animals in Parks.
a. No person shall cause, permit, or allow any animal owned or possessed by him or her, or any animal in his or her care, custody, or control to be present in any park except:

Equine animals being led or ridden under reasonable control upon any bridle path or trail provided for equine purposes;
ii. Equine or other animals which are hitched or fastened at a place expressly designated for such purpose;
iii. Dogs or cats when led by a cord or chain not more than six (6) feet long, or when confined within the interior of a vehicle; iv. Service animals including, but not limited to, specially trained animals that meet the following requirements:

1. Used by blind or disabled persons to aid and guide them;

2. Led by a cord or chain not more than six (6) feet long unless the cord or chain would interfere with the service animal's work or the individual's disability prevents using these devices;
v. Small pets weighing five (5) lbs. or less, which are kept on the person of the possessor at all times;
vi. Dogs confined in specified off-leash dog areas;

Ordinance No. 1988

vii. In connection with activities authorized in writing by the City Manager or designee;
viii. Fowls or animals turned loose at the direction of the City Manager or designee.
b. The City Manager may prohibit animals in certain posted areas in Parks and park facilities in the interest of public health, safety, comfort, and welfare, or the purpose of habitat protection.
c. Feeding, Harassing, or Hunting Wildlife. It is unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to hunt, feed, harass, harm, frighten, kill, trap, chase, tease, shoot or throw devices at any animal or bird in any park, nor shall any person remove or have in their possession any wild animals, or the eggs or nest or young of any animal or bird in any Park. This section shall not apply to City, law enforcement, fire district or animal control personnel in their official duties. d. Duty to Care for Animals. It shall be the mandatory duty of all persons owning, possessing, in control of or otherwise responsible for a dog, cat, or an equine animal in any Park or park facility to promptly collect, pick up, and remove all fecal matter left behind by the animal in or upon any park space provided, however this subsection shall not apply to guide dogs for blind or disabled persons or to equine animals on a designated trail. Fecal matter may be disposed of in the appropriate waste receptacles provided therefore in the parks.

M. Amplified Sound in Parks
a. Purpose - The Council enacts this section for the sole purpose of securing and promoting the public health, comfort, safety, and welfare of its citizenry.

While recognizing that certain uses of sound amplifying equipment are protected by constitutional rights of free speech and assembly, the City must reasonably regulate the use of sound amplifying equipment in order to protect the correlative constitutional rights of the citizens of this community to privacy and freedom from the public nuisance of loud and unnecessary sound.
b. It is unlawful for any person to install, use, and operate within a park a loudspeaker or any sound amplifying equipment for the purposes of giving instructions, directions, talks, addresses, or lectures, or of transmitting music to any persons or groups of persons in any park, or in the vicinity of such park, except when installed, used, or operated in compliance with one of the following provisions:
i. By authorized law enforcement or park and recreation personnel; or
ii. In accordance with Section 9.28.020 of this Municipal Code, live entertainment may occur under a reservation or permit issued by the City Manager or designee, and when operated in accordance with terms of such reservation or permit.

Ordinance No. 1988

c. Granting or Denial of Permit.
i. In determining whether to grant or deny a permit, the City Manager or designee shall be guided by the following considerations:

1. The constitutional free speech and assembly rights of all persons including the applicant.

2. The possible effects upon the peaceable passage or presence of property.

3. The potential for disorder or unlawful injury to persons or property.

4. The potential invasion of other people's right of privacy.

5. The possible unlawful breach or disturbance of the peace.

6. Any actual conflict with other scheduled park uses or events.
ii. The City Manager or designee shall not deny a permit on the basis of any dislike for or disagreement with the content of any proposed talks, addresses, lectures, or musical presentations.

The City Manager or designee may, however, deny a permit for any such events which are designed for the purpose of advocating imminent lawless conduct.
iii. Power Source for Amplifiers. Amplifiers are permitted in parks and shall be operated only through a power source provided by the City, with a battery, or with a generator as approved by the City Manager or designee.

N. Solicitation in Parks is prohibited in accordance with Section 5.28.050 of this Municipal Code.

O. Professional Filming and Still Photography. Except in the service of the City and authorized by a Director or designee, no person shall photograph, videotape, or film for commercial (profit or sale) purposes in any park or park facility without obtaining a City issued film permit in accordance with Section 17.41.090 of this Municipal Code.

P. Camping and Storage of Personal Property. The unlawful camping and storage of personal property within Parks or park facilities is regulated under Chapter 12.46 of this Municipal Code.

Q. Hitting golf balls in Parks or park facilities is prohibited in accordance with Section 8.44.030 of this Municipal Code.

12.36.060 Designated skateboard/ skating areas.

The city council may, from time to time, designate by a resolution certain areas as a skateboard/skating area.

Ordinance No. 1988

12.36.070 Liability in connection with use of skateboard/skating areas.

The use of any skateboard/skating area is a hazardous recreational activity within the meaning of California Government Code Section 831.7. Subject to the provisions of that code section, the City may not be held liable for an injury incurred by any person participating in any such hazardous recreational activity. Skateboard/skating areas are not regularly supervised and all users assume all risks of injury in utilizing such areas.

12.36.080 Regulations applicable to the use of designated skateboard/skating areas.

A. No person shall skate or skateboard, or otherwise be present within any skateboard/skating areas, at all times other than those established as the hours of operation. Hours of operation shall be posted. The hours are subject to change without prior notice.

B. No person shall use any skateboard/skating area for any use other than skateboarding and skating.

C. Each person using any skateboard/skating area must wear a shirt and proper safety equipment including a helmet, elbow pads and kneepads. All such safety equipment must be functional and protective, properly sized and designed for skating or skateboarding purposes. Soft-sided shoes must be worn by skateboarders.

D. No person shall ride or use any wheeled devices other than roller skates, in- line skates, or skateboards within any skateboard/skating area. Use of any other wheeled devices including, but not limited to, bicycles, scooters, unicycles, go-carts, or wagons is prohibited.

E. No person shall possess or use alcohol or illegal drugs within a skateboard/skating area or in surrounding park areas. Tobacco products are prohibited in the skateboard/skating area.

F. No person shall litter in any skateboard/skating area. All persons using a skateboard/skating area must place any trash created or brought to the skateboard/skating area in refuse containers provided by the city. If the city provides no refuse container, each person shall be responsible for removing and disposing of such items in an appropriate manner.

G. No person shall cause graffiti or tagging in or upon any skateboard/skating area or anywhere in the surrounding park areas.

H. No person shall ride, or permit to be ridden, any skateboard or skates in a skateboard/skating area in a reckless manner or with willful disregard for the safety of persons or property.

Ordinance No. 1988

I. No person shall skate on the curbs, sidewalk, fences, railings and/or driveway of any city-owned area surrounding or adjoining a skateboard/skating area.

J. Glass containers or other glass products are prohibited within a skateboard/skating area.

K. No ramps, jumps or other obstacles may be placed in any skateboard/skating area.

L. No skateboard/skating area may be used if any hazardous condition exists, including, but not limited to, inclement weather conditions, and/or significant cracks, breaks or other irregularities in the skating surface of the skateboard/skating area that are visible to the user.

M. All organized events utilizing a skateboard/skating area are prohibited without the prior written approval of the chief of police.

N. No animals are allowed in any skateboard/skating area.

O. Personal stereos, earphones and headphones are prohibited within any skateboard/skating area.

P. The city is not responsible for items which are lost or stolen within any skateboard/skating area.

Q. Any person suffering an injury within a skateboard/skating area must promptly report the injury to the city human resources/risk management department.

12.36.090 Signs required.

In order to provide reasonable notice to the public, signs referring to this Chapter shall be posted in one or more conspicuous areas at or near the entrance to each Park, each skateboard/skating area, and each designated park setting forth the rules and regulations established herein, including prohibited activities and Permit requirements, and stating that any person failing to comply with any provision of this Chapter shall be subject to citation.

12.36.100 Violations, penalties and enforcement.

Any person violating any of the provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to removal from a Park, designated park, park facility, or skateboard/skating area, and such violation shall be punishable as an infraction as provided in Section 1.16.020 of the Upland Municipal Code unless the specific section violated provides for a different punishment."
Section 3. Chapter 12.44 of Title 12 of the Upland Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety.

Ordinance No. 1988

Section 4. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

Further, if the activity is deemed a project this City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from its adoption.

Section 7. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Upland, pursuant to all legal requirements.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 2024.

Bill Velto, Mayor
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland held on the 22nd day of April, 2024, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland on the 13th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

���c �pl"� CITY FUPLAND
�5 FO _�� "The City of Gracious Living"
C'tIB�S
Staicf(k-r Ctilt
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:CHRIS ALANIS,INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

JOSE REYES,LEAD EQUIPMENT MECHANIC
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE TO AN EXISTING PURCHASE ORDER WITH 10-8 RETROFIT
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve an increase to the existing purchase order with 10-8 Retrofit by $62,000 for a total purchase order amount of$95,000; and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of a long-term City-wide fleet replacement and modernization program.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Fleet Maintenance Division is responsible for purchase, disposal, maintenance and operation of City vehicles and equipment. When the Fleet Division purchases vehicles, they must often be equipped with specialized equipment for the vehicle function and its intended purpose.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The Fleet Maintenance Division is currently using two vendors for upfitting and repairs of emergency equipment and lighting of the City's fleet. West Coast Lights and Sirens and 10-8 Retrofit.

The upfitting and repairs of the Police Patrol Division is on a sole source contract with West Coast Lights and Sirens to maintain consistency of installation and operation of the emergency equipment. The upfitting of the Police Administration and Public Works vehicles are bid per vehicle between our two venders and is awarded based on pricing and timeline of the completion of the upfitting.

The Fleet Maintenance Division is estimating the need to increase the purchase order with 10-8 Retrofit by$62,000 based on passed bid history of our vendors.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The subject action approves a purchase order for the installation and repairs of emergency equipment on Police and City vehicles. This is not considered a"project"under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines. Under this section, a project does not include the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activities,which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACTS
No additional appropriations are necessary at this time. Sufficient funding is available in Funds 640, 645 and 752 Fiscal Year 2023/24 Operating Budget.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

�� �pl"� CITY
UPLAND
„.;
"The City of Gracious Living"
C�tIFOB�Sc_Sta(f(krc4t
DATE: April 22,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:CHRIS ALANIS,INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

STEVEN NIX,CONTRACT ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER AWARD OF BID FOR PROJECT NO. 82347,PD AIR HANDLER REPLACEMENT(BID NO.2024-03)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for Project No. 82347; award the construction contract to F.M. Thomas Air Conditioning,Inc., in the amount of$392,326;and approve a construction contingency in the amount of$82,674,for a total amount of$475,000.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the city's objective to continue to maintain and improve the City's public building facilities.

BACKGROUND
The current City of Upland Police Station located at 1499 W. 13th Street was constructed and occupied nearly thirty- five years ago in 1989.Since its construction,there has been very limited updating of any of the mechanical equipment.

In August 2017, the city contracted with Alliance Building Solutions to provide solar installation and other energy conservation upgrades at the city's main building facilities.Under this contract the Police Station received solar panel installation,a high efficiency air-cooled chiller,an Energy Management System to control the HVAC,and an upgrade of all lighting to LED.

In late 2020,the existing hot water boiler and associated water piping between the chiller and boiler to the PD station were replaced, leaving only the twenty-nine (29) air handler units as original equipment. In May 2023, one of these air handlers began leaking and required replacement.During this replacement,it was suggested by the contractor that the remaining would likely be in similar condition and replacement should be highly considered.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The PD Air Handler Replacement Project Notice Inviting Bids(NIB)was advertised on March 15,2024 and March 22, 2024 in accordance with the California Public Contract Code (Section 20164) and was also listed on the City's website. On April 15,2024,the City received and opened 3 bids for the project,under Bid No.2024-03 as follows:

BIDDER BID AMOUNT
F.M. Thomas Air Conditioning,Inc. $392,326.00 ACCO Engineered Systems,Inc. $ 560,000.00
MEP Fusion Inc. $749,625.00
Considering that there is a substantial range between the three bids, staff reviewed each bid to confirm that each of the bidders understood the bid documents and that the bids all represented similar equipment and scope of work.While all three bidders do appear to be providing similar equipment, the method of installation each bidder proposed to complete the project led to the significant variance in the bids.

Staff spoke with F.M. Thomas and discussed their proposed plan of action for the project, reviewed the provided references,and confirmed that F.M. Thomas Air Conditioning Inc. of Brea, California,is the lowest responsible and

responsive bidder. If awarded by the City Council, construction is anticipated to begin in June 2024 and be substantially complete by August 2024.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, and determined to be categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), of the CEQA guidelines. The project involves replacement of existing equipment within the existing facility footprint and does not involve any expansion of use beyond that which is existing.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The City's adopted Fiscal year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program(FY 23-24 CIP)budget contains sufficient funds for the project.The estimated project costs and funding are summarized below:

Estimated Project Costs
Basic Bid Amount: $392,326.00
Contingency: $ 82,674.00
Total Contract Work: $475,000.00
Construction Administration and Inspection: $ 25,000.00 Total Project Cost: $500,000.00
Funding:

FY 23-24 CIP Account No.425-7500-82347(Capital Fund) $650,000.00 Total Project Funding: $650,000.00

ALTERNATIVES

1. Reject all bids and authorize City Clerk to re-advertise the PD Air Handler Replacement Project.Due to the successful bidding process,staff does not recommend the alternative.

2. Provide Alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Determined to be categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities)of the CEQA guidelines.

, trpl" CITY OF
5, • "The City of Gracious Living"
Staff(krctilt
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:CHRIS ALANIS,INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

TANYA GARCIA, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ANALYST
SUBJECT: CALRECYCLE USED OIL PAYMENT PROGRAM(OPP CYCLE 14)GRANT RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that City Council accept the CalRecycle Used Oil Payment Cycle 14 Grant Award of$11,080 and appropriate the funding to the FY 2023/24 Solid Waste fund.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal by pursuing grant funding to supplement the City's local funding resources and exercising prudent financial management of the City's Solid Waste program funds.

BACKGROUND
On June 7,2023,the City applied to receive Used Oil Payment Program Cycle 11 (OPP 11)Grant funding to support the City's efforts to properly dispose of and recycle used oil within the City. Used Oil is collected at the City's Household Hazardous(HHW)Collection Center located at the Public Works City Yard at 1370 N. Benson Avenue.

Additionally, used oil is collected at auto parts stores and auto repair stores, and reported as part of the City's solid waste used oil collection program.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
This program provides funding from the State for the continued proper management of used oil waste and environmental protection within San Bernardino County.

The OPP 14 funds help to augment and fund the HHW San Bernardino annual waste collection service contract, purchase of used oil collection containers, public outreach efforts and other activities associated with the proper collection,disposal,and recycling of used oil.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA.The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The Solid Waste fund's approved FY 2023/24 operating budget will be increased by$11,080 for the recommended appropriation and for the OPP 14 grant revenue received.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

THE BACK OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK-VIEW AT AN ANGLE

WARRANT NUMBER
F . MQAQI3 0P CALII 3AlilL1G1 66 920128
FUND NO. FUND NAME
THE TREASURER OF THE STATE WILL PAY OUT OF THE 8087 FISCAL CONSOLIDATED PMT alawrimrennN Nn
0 NIO.i DAY YR. 90-1342/1211
04 ' 11 '2024 66920128 I I
Z
0 _DOLLARS CENTS
TO 920128 I$** hb080, 00
--- CITY OF UPLAND
460 N EUCLID AVE
UPLAND CA 91786-4732 _ /jag/t-c --- .1!!!)
MALIA M. COHEN

CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLER
DETACH ON DOTTEDYOUR LINE 66-920128
KEEP THkS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
ISSUE DATE: 04/11/2024

RESOURCES RECYCLING & RECOVERY
1001 I ST. P . O . BOX 4025
SACRAMENTO CA 95812-4025
FOR QUESTIONS CONTACT ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT AT 916/341-6645 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID
CITY OF UPLAND 0000040186
VOUCHER ID INVOICE ID PO ID
00193183 OPP14-23-0027 0000013755

AMOUNT PAID
$ 11080 . 00

PAYMENT MESSAGE
ATTN : PUBLIC WORKS DEPT

ADDITIONAL PAYMENT MESSAGE
USED OIL PAYMENT PROGRAM (OPP14 )

RECEIVED
APR 1 6 2024

FINANCE DIVISION

caoIe Used Oil Payment Program
Application Certification
City of Upland
Fiscal Year:2023-24 Cycle:OPP14
Program Requirements Summary
1)Public Resources Code 48691(a)(1)(2)
Ensures there is one Certified Used Oil Collection Center for every 100,000 residents. 2)Public Resources Code 48691(b)
Our program has a public education component that informs the public of locally available used oil recycling opportunities.
3)Are you currently participating in mediation mandated by AB506,have attempted to initiate such mediation or have you declared a fiscal emergency within the last 12 months? No
Acceptance of Used Oil Payment Program Provisions
Applicant acknowledges that submittal of this application constitutes acceptance of all provisions as contained in the Used Oil Payment Program Guidelines.The Guidelines document is available at:
http// www.calrecycle.ca gov/UsedOil/LGF
Payment Information
Payment Option:April Payment Requested:Standard payment request Payment Address:City of Upland-Public Works Dept. ,460 N. Euclid Ave., Upland ,CA 91786 Contact Type Name Title
Primary Braden Yu Public Works Director
Signatory Authority
Secondary Tanya Garcia Management Analyst
Document Type Date* Title
Resolution 6/6/2023 Resolution No.6000
Application Certification Pending Upload
Letter of Designation(LOD) Pending Upload
Secondary Due Date:07/26/2023
Participant Jurisdiction Document Type Date Penalty of Perjury Statement:
"I certify under penalty of perjury,under the laws of the State of California that I am authorized to sign this application on behalf of Applicant,that I have read the Used Oil Payment Guidelines and that to the best of my knowledge and belief that info ' n provided in this Application is true and correct." X
O to I O'-I / 2 0 2?,.

Signature of Signature Authority(as a 'zed in Resolution)or Date Authorized Designee(as authorized in Le er of Designation) ?wad 1u . P• E• Pkih1ir. vnlor1_C ��rcctor Print Name Print Title
IMPORTANT!Applicant must print out this page,obtain Signature of Signature Authority,upload signed document to the LoGOPP system,and retain the original document in Applicant's cycle file.

City of Upland Printed:6/7/2023

4��a �p19� CITY UPLAND
�5, _�� "The City of Gracious Living"
C,,tIFOB,S
'• Staff(kr Ctilt
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:CHRIS ALANIS,INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

RICHARD SMIDERLE,OPERATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A PURCHASE ORDER INCREASE FOR WEST COAST

ARBORISTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a budget amendment and approve an increase to an existing Purchase Order with West Coast Arborists in the amount of$83,645 for a total purchase order amount of$1,083,645,to cover unforeseen tree related projects/reports for the current fiscal year.

The proposed action supports the City's goal to maintain the integrity of the urban forest maintenance standards and requirements.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department is responsible for trimming, removing, planting, and maintaining the City's urban forest. When capital improvement projects begin,there are unforeseen tree work that is sometimes needed in order to reestablish the concrete hardscape back to standards.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
West Coast Arborists has been the City's long-standing urban forest contractor and has provided excellent service related to routine/scheduled tree trimming as well as various tasks on an as-needed basis such as dead tree removals, resident paid special request trimming,windstorm related emergency on-call services,arborist evaluation services and services to the City's Engineering Department during C.I.P.projects.

In the current fiscal year,the City has experienced an unanticipated increase in CIP tree work due to hardscape removal and replacement in which tree roots have impacted tree stability and health.Also in the current fiscal year,the City's three routine/scheduled maintenance zones experienced an increase in trees that were in need of extensive trimming due to excessive growth. The City's Downtown Parklet Project also required additional arborist report services for tree removal aspects of the project. These all factored into the overall increased cost.

Staff are recommending an$83,645 increase in our Purchase Order with West Coast Arborists for a total amount of $1,083,645.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and the State CEQA Guidelines, and determined to be categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c)(Existing Facilities),of CEQA Guidelines. The project involves repair,maintenance,of existing public facilities,and does not involve any expansion of use beyond that which exists.

FISCAL IMPACTS
A budget amendment transferring funds from 101-5401-5258 to 101-5409-5253 in the amount of$30,000 will be required to complete the PO amendment detailed above.

Once the budget amendment is completed, the FY 23/24 operating budget has sufficient funds in the following accounts for the increase to the purchase order for West Coast Arborists:

Land Development#229-2501-5222-32337$3,645
Public Works#101-5409-5253 -$30,000

Engineering#204-7078-5258-$28,250
Engineering#204-7069-0000-$11,000
Engineering#204-9124-0000-$10,750

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Determine to be Categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c) (Existing Facilities)of the CEQA guidelines.

..t �pl"� CITY FU P LA N D
"The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krcifil
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:CHRIS ALANIS,INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

ALAN FRENCH,PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 20151 RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council accept the improvements for Tract Map 20151 and release the improvement bonds.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to adhere to a review schedule for the processing of development proposals in an efficient,professionally responsive,and courteous manner.

BACKGROUND
Tract 20151 is a condominium project and includes the development of 37 condominium units. GFR Homes had completed construction of both the private and public improvements required for the development in 2021.The City has inspected the improvements and found them to be in compliance with the approved plans.

On October 9, 2019, GFR Homes posted a Public Improvement Performance Bond in the amount of Four Hundred Forty Sixty Thousand Dollars ($446,000) and a Labor and Materials bond in the amount of Two Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Dollars ($223,000) to ensure completion of the proposed public improvements and also posted a Private Improvement Performance Bond in the amount of Four Hundred Eighty Two Thousand Dollars ($482,000) and a Labor and Materials bond in the amount of Two Hundred Forty One Thousand Dollars ($241,000)to ensure completion of the proposed private improvements.

On November 9, 2020, the City Council reduced the project bonds as a majority of the project was completed. The project was completed in 2021 and all the homes are occupied at this time.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
In conformance with the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No.4886 by the Planning Commission,GFR Homes has completed the improvements required for the development. The City has inspected the completed improvements and found them to be in compliance with the conditions of approval and approved plans. The City can now accept the off-site improvements and release the remaining Performance Bond as the work has been completed for more than one year. Similarly,the Labor and Material Bond will be released after this action is approved as there have been no claims (e.g. by vendors, subcontractors, etc.) filed against the project in accordance with Upland Municipal Code Section 16.20.010.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This action is not a project and is exempt from environmental proceedings of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACTS
With this action, the City is accepting approximately $446,000 (see attached engineer's estimate) in public improvement capital assets,which will be added to the City's infrastructure inventory and will be maintained by the City going forward.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a project.

t •
�� ,� CITY OF UPLAND
�" � 4. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
c" 4 ENGINEERING DIVISION
B t -4‹. Y. R
cz: , . COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY SHEET
4 Folt Public Improvements

BOND AMOUNT CALCULATION
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Item Description Estimated Cost
1 . Street Improvements $ 315,955.00
2 . Sewer Improvements $ 21,300.00
3 . Water Improvements $ 34,500.00
4 . Drainage Improvements $ -
6 . Miscellaneous $ -
Sub-total $ 371,755.00
20%Contingency $ 74,351.00
Total Bond Amount $ 446,106.00
Faithful Performance(100%) $ 446,000.00 Labor and Materials(50%) $ 223,000.00
Final Monuments $ 4,200.00
(Cash Deposit required for mon ts)
--cop
T
e-� oQROFEssro
# ONO J. 7
47�Nam' ra '� n
apt & 36 2: /
Date.'
Estimated By: Raymond J Allard
RCE#: CA 36052 or C►VtiL �P
Date: 8/20/2019 9r-OF CA'LIFo��
Place RCE stamp and signature
Bond amounts will be calculated by the developer's engineer and checked by the Public Works Department.

Inspection fee deposits shall be paid prior to issuance of permit.

Estimate of Cost for
Public Street Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Street Items Quantity Unit Price Amount Roadway Excavation

1. Projects with Grading Plan area X 0.50' CY $ 25.00 $ -

2. Projects without Grading Plan road area and $ - (a)Excavate&Fill CY(c or f) $ 8.00 $ - (b)Excavate&Export CY(c-f) $ 3.00 $ - PCC Curb and Gutter 6" 220 LF $ 66.00 $ 14,520.00 PCC Curb and Gutter 8" 90 LF $ 70.00 $ 6,300.00 Rock Curb and Gutter(6-sack mix for curb) LF $ 110.00 $ - PCC Sidewalk 3000 SF $ 10.00 $ 30,000.00 PCC Cross Gutter/Spandrel 300 SF $ 16.00 T$ 4,800.00 PCC Curb Only 6" LF $ 53.00 $ -
PCC Curb Only 8" LF $ 55.00 $ •
Rolled Curb LF $ 70.00-'$ -
PCC Pavement 200 SF $ 16.00 $ 3,200.00 Ribbon/Alley Gutter LF $ 16.00 $ -
Wheelchair Ramp(ADA Compliant) 2 EA $ 4,000.00 $ 8,000.00 Drive or Alley Approach 235 SF _$ 12.00 $ 2,820.00 Asphalt Concrete(144 lbs/ft3) 75 TON _ $ 95.00 $ 7,125.00 AC Patch-Trench(Match Existing) SF $ 11.00 $ - Grind&AC Overlay @ 0.50 inch _ 180 SF $ 4.00 $ 720.00 Aggregate Base CL II 64 CY $ 55.00 $ 3,520.00 AC Berm LF $ 20.00 $ -
Street Lights Underground+Trench(Standard Marbelite) EA $ 12,000.00 $ - Street Lights Underground+Trench(Decorative) 2 EA $ 14,000.00 $ 28,000.00 Install Barricades LF $ 110.00 $ - _Remove Barricades LF $ 10.00 $ -
Remove AC Pavement 9850 SF $ 3.00 $ 29,550.00 Remove PCC Curb 610 LF $ 10.00 $ 6,100.00 Adjust Sewer Manhole to grade 1 EA $ 900.00 $ 900.00 Adjust Water Valve to grade 2 EA $ 300.00 $ 600.00 Sawcut LF $ 2.00 $ -
_
Decorative Concrete SF $ 35.00 $ -
Underwalk Drain EA $ 3,800.00 $
Parkway Trees 8 EA $ 350.00 ,..$ 2,800.00 -
Parkway Landscape and Irrigation 4650 SF $ 4.50 $ 20,925.00 Install Chain Link Fence LF $ 50.00 $ -
Irrigation Backflow Prevention Assembly(w/enclosure) $ ~
Relocate Power Pole _ 2_ EA $ 30,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Underground Power Poles 200 LF $ 400.00 $ 80,000.00 Remove Water Meter and Cap 2 EA $ 300.00 $ 600.00 Remove Sign 3 EA _$ 200.00 $ 600.00
Remove Sidewalk and Drive Approaches 1950 SF $ 2.50 $ 4,875.00 Total for Street Improvements $ 315,955.00
By: Raymond J Allard
Street Drawing Number(s): GP 18-15
Page2of7 Page 41 of 219

Estimate of Cost for
Public Sewer Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes (20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Sewer Items Quantity Unit Price Amount
Sewer Manholes (48-inch Diameter) 1 EA $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 Sewer Drop manholes (48-inch Diameter) EA $ 20,000.00 $ - Sewer Cleanouts 1 EA $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 6-inch VCP Sewer Laterals LF $ 85.00 $ - 8-inch VCP Sewer Mainline LF $ 100.00 $ - 10-inch VCP Sewer LF $ 120.00 $ - 12-inch VCP Sewer LF $ 145.00 $ - Concrete Encasement 8-inch LF $ 80.00 $ - Concrete Encasement 10-inch LF $ 82.00 $ - Concrete Encasement 12-inch LF $ 85.00 $ - 8-inch CIP Mainline 42 LF $ 150.00 $ 6,300.00 Adjust Cleanout to Grade EA $ 300.00 $ - Adjust Manhole to Grade EA $ 900.00 $ - Remove Manhole EA $ 2,500.00 $ - Connect to Existing Manhole and Rechannel EA $ 4,000.00 $ - Backflow Device EA $ 2,500.00 $ - 8-inch x 4-inch Sewer Wye EA $ 600.00 $ - Grease Interceptor(750 gal. min.) EA $ 9,000.00 $ - •
Total for Sewer Improvements $ 21,300.00
By: Raymond J Allard
Sewer Drawing Number(s): GP 18-15
Page3of7 Page42of219

Estimate of Cost for
Public Water Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Water Items Quantity Unit Price Amount
6-inch Water Main (CML&C) LF $ 120.00
6-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 2,300.00 $ - 8-inch Water Main (CML&C) LF $ 125.00 $ - 8-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 2,500.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly 1 EA $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 12-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 6,000.00 $ - Upgrade 4-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly to 6-inch EA $ 11,000.00 $ - Relocate 6-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly EA $ 11,000.00 $ - 3-inch Water Service 1 EA $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 1 1/2-inch Water Service EA $ 3,500.00 $ - 1-inch Water Service EA $ 2,500.00 $ - 2-inch Air Vacuum Release Valve EA $ 7,000.00 $ - Blind Flange EA $ 2,000.00 $ -
Relocate Existing Water meter EA $ 1,000.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Service 25 LF $ 120.00 $ 3,000.00 Backflow Device 1 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 8-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 12,000.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve 1 EA $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 4-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 6,500.00 $ - 4-inch Modified Blow-Off Assembly EA $ 6,500.00 $ - Blow Off Assembly EA $ 5,000.00 $ - Recycled Water Line, Irrigation LF $ -
6" Hot Tap 2 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 Total for Water Improvements $ 34,500.00
By: Raymond J Allard
Water Drawing Number(s): GP 18-15

Estimate of Cost for
Public Storm Drain Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes (20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Storm Drain Items Quantity Unit Price Amount 18-inch RCP LF $ 215.00
24-inch RCP LF $ 225.00 $ -
30-inch RCP LF $ 240.00 $ -
36-inch RCP LF $ 270.00 $ -
42-inch RCP LF $ 300.00 $ -
48-inch RCP LF $ 450.00 $ -
54-inch RCP LF $ 480.00 $ -
60-inch RCP _ _ LF $ 495.00 $ - 72-inch RCP EA $ 600.00 $ -
8-inch HDPE LF $ 45.00 $ -
12-inch HDPE LF $ 65.00 $ -
Standard Manhole EA $ 14,000.00 $ - Junction Structure (with manhole) _ EA $ 23,000.00 _$ - Junction Structure(without manhole) LF $ 9,000.00 $ - 4' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 10,000.00 $ - 7' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 12,000.00 $ - 10'Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 15,000.00 $ - 14' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 18,000.00 $ - 21'Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 25,000.00 $ - Concrete Collar EA $ 2,000.00 $• - Clean Out EA $ 3,000.00 $ -
Curb Inlet/Outlet EA $ 3,500.00 $ - Bio-Swale LF $ 10.00 $ -
12"x12" Box Inlet EA $ 1,500.00 $ - 18"x18" or 24"x24" Box Inlet EA $ 2,500.00 $ - Total for Storm Drain Improvements $ -
By:

Storm Drain Drawing Number(s):

Raymond J Allard

Estimate of Cost for
Traffic Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Traffic Improvements Quantity Unit Price Amount 4" Painted Broken Stripes LF $ 2.00 $ - 4" Painted Double Solid Stripes LF $ 3.00 $ - 6" Painted Bike Lane Stripes LF _ $ 3.00 $ - - Painted One-Way, No Passing LF $ 2.00 $ - Painted Two-Way, Left Turn Lane LF $ 3.00 '$ - Painted Pavement Markings SF $ 3.00 $ - 8"Thermoplastic Channelizing Line LF $ 4.50 $ - 12"Thermoplastic Crosswalk&Limit Line LF $ 6.50 $ - Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF $ 6.00 $ - Street Name Sign & Post EA $ 350.00 $ - Stop Sign&Post EA $ 300.00 $ -
Road Sign on existing pole/post(One Post) EA $ 200.00 $ - Road Sign on existing pole/post(Two Post) EA $ 300.00 $ - Street Sign (Mast Arm Hanger Method) EA $ 800.00 $ - Remove Painted Stripes& Pavement Markings SF $ 3.00 $ - Remove Thermoplastic Stripes& Pavement Markings SF $ 5.00 $ - Traffic Signal&Lighting-New Installation LS $ 325,000.00 $ - Traffic Signal&Lighting-Modification LS $ 200,000.00 $ - Type E-6' Round Signal Loops EA $ 600.00 $ - .

Type D-6'Square Loops with bike detection zone EA $ 800.00 $ - Install Pull Box(#5) EA $ _ 1,500.00 $ - Install Pull Box(#6) EA _ $ 1,700.00 $ - Install Pull Box(#6E) _ EA $ 1,800.00 $ - 2" Conduit LF w$ 36.00 _$ -
3" Conduit LF $ 45.00 $ -
3" PVC Conduit(for Fiber Optic Cable only) LF $ 45.00 $ - 24 Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable _ _ LF $ 7.00 $ - 12 Pair Interconnect Cable LF $ 8.00 $ Bike Loops EA $ 600.00 $ -
Video Detection Camera & Processor EA $ 5,500.00 $ - Traffic Signal Cabinet(Caltrans 332) EA $ 25,000.00 $ - Total for Traffic Improvements $ -
By: Raymond J Allard
Drawing Number(s): GP 18-15

Estimate of Cost for
Public Miscellaneous Improvements and Final Monuments
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Miscellaneous Items Quantity Unit Price Amount $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$Total for Miscellaneous Improvements,$
By:

Miscellaneous Drawing Number(s):

Miscellaneous Final Monuments Quantity _ Unit Price Amount Monumentation per lot(refundable) 6 EA $ 700.00 $ 4,200.00 $
$
$
$$ -
Total for Final Monuments $ 4,200.00
By: Raymond J Allard
Final Map Number: Tract 20151

or °p,� CITY OF UPLAND
y4, : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
�'_ � ENGINEERING DIVISION
4IP.11, �r VI rills,
sr CV ,.:._,.,fr COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY SHEET f' -14rF°l` Private Improvements
\i)
BOND AMOUNT CALCULATION it.-GGSQ
p.

Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC) __--- Project: Tract 20151-Onsite
Location: Foothill East of Benson 4�0. -'
Item Description Estimated Cost
1 . Street Improvements $ 110,554.00
2 . Sewer Improvements $ 124,904.00
3 . Water Improvements $ 138,108.00
4 . Drainage Improvements $ 28,496.00
6 . Miscellaneous $ -
Sub-total $ 402,062.00
20%Contingency $ 80,412.40
Total Bond Amount: $ 482,474.40
Faithful Performance(100%) $ 482,000.00
Labor and Materials(50%) $ 241,000.00
Final Monuments $ 4,200.00
(Cash Deposit required for monuments)
( QFES % 6
36� %1rn
Estimated By: Raymond J Allard
RCE#: CA 36052 ST ClVll
Date: 11/18/2019 9p6.°F CISL'c ' '
Place RCE stamp and signature
Bond amounts will be calculated by the developer's engineer and checked by the Public Works Department.

Inspection fee deposits shall be paid prior to issuance of permit.

•
Estimate of Cost for
Public Street improvements
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Street items Quantity Unit Price Amount
Roadway Excavation

1.Projects with Grading Plan area X 0.50' CY $ 12.00 $ -

2.Projects without Grading Plan road area and $ - (a)Excavate&Fill CY(c or f) $ 3.00 $ - (b)Excavate&Export CY(c-f) $ 1.00 $ - PCC Curb and Gutter 6" 330 LF $ 11.00 $ 3,630.00 PCC Curb and Gutter 8" LF $ 13.00 $ -
Rock Curb and Gutter(6-sack mix for curb) LF $ 110.00 $ - PCC Sidewalk 4100 SF $ 6.00 $ 24,600.00
PCC Cross Gutter/Spandrel 1419 SF $ 8.00 $ 11,352.00 PCC Curb Only 6" LF $ 8.00 $ -
I_PCC Curb Only 8" LF $ 10.00 $ -
Rolled Curb LF $ 12.00 $ -
PCC Pavement SF $ 8.00 $ -
Ribbon/Alley Gutter _ LF $ 12.00 $ .

Wheelchair Ramp(ADA Compliant) 9 EA $ 1,600.00 $ 14,400.00 Drive or Ailey Approach SF $ 8.00 $ -
Asphalt Concrete(144 lbs/ft3) 476 TON $ 76.00 $ 36,176.00 AC Patch-Trench(Match Existing) SF $ 4.00 $ - Grind&AC Overlay @ 0.50 inch SF $ 3.00 $ - Aggregate Base CL II 409 CY $ 44.00 $ 17,996.00 AC Berm LF $ 11.00 $ -
Street Lights Underground+Trench(standard Marbe;ke) EA $ 4,800.00 $ - Street Lights Underground+Trench(Decorative) EA $ 5,600.00 $ - F Install Barricades LF $ 88.00 $ -
Remove Barricades LF $ 8.00 $ -
_
Remove AC Pavement SF $ 2.00 $ -
Remove PCC Curb LF $ 8.00 $ -
Adjust Sewer Manhole to grade 6 EA $ 400.00 $ 2,400.00 W
Adjust Water Valve to grade EA $ 240.00 $ - Sawcut LF $ 2.00 $ -
Decorative Concrete SF $ 10.00 $ -
Underwalk Drain EA $ 1,440.00 $ -
Parkway Trees EA $ 280.00 $ -
Parkway Landscape and Irrigation SF $ 1.00 $ - Install Chain Link Fence LF $ 13.00 $ - Irrigation Backflow Prevention Assembly(w/endowre) $ - •
Relocate Power Pole EA $ 8,000.00 $ - Underground Power Poles LF $ 400.00 $ - Remove Water Meter and Cap EA $ 300.00 $ - Remove Sign EA $ 200.00 $ -
Remove Sidewalk and Drive Approaches SF $ 2.50 $ - Total for Street Improvements $ 110,554.00
By:Raymond 1 Allard
Street Drawing Number(s): GP 18-15

Estimate of Cost for
Public Sewer Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Sewer Items Quantity _ Unit Price Amount
Sewer Manholes (48-inch Diameter) 6 EA $ 3,600.00 $ 21,600.00 Sewer Drop manholes(48-inch Diameter) EA $ 4,400.00 $ - Sewer Cleanouts 2 EA $ 800.00 $ 1,600.00 6-inch VCP Sewer Laterals 550 LF $ 48.00 $ 26,400.00 8-inch VCP Sewer Mainline _ 938 IF $ 68.00 $ 63,784.00 10-inch VCP Sewer LF $ 88.00 $ - 12-inch VCP Sewer LF $ 96.00 $ - Concrete Encasement 8-inch IF $ 12.00 $ - Concrete Encasement 10-inch IF $ 14.00 $ - Concrete Encasement 12-inch LF _$ 16.00 $ - I 8-inch CIP Mainline LF $ 120.00 $ - Adjust Cleanout to Grade 36 EA $ 240.00 $ 8,640.00 Adjust Manhole to Grade 6, EA $ 480.00 $ 2,880.00 Remove Manhole EA $ 1,600.00 $ -
Connect to Existing Manhole and Rechannel EA $ 1,440.00 $ - Backflow Device EA $ 640.00 $ - 8-inch x 4-inch Sewer Wye EA $ 480.00 $ - Grease Interceptor(750 gal. min.) EA $ 6,000.00 $ - Total for Sewer Improvements $ 124,904.00
By: Raymond J Allard
Sewer Drawing Number(s): GP 18-15

Estimate of Cost for
Public Water Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Water Items Quantity Unit Price Amount
3-inch Water PVC 900 LF $ 52.00 $ 46,800.00 6-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 1,040.00 $ - 8-inch Water Main(CML&C) LF $ 64.00 $ - 8-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 1,200.00 $ 6-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly 3 EA $ 4,640.00 $ _13,920.00 12-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve _ EA $ 2,960.00 $ _ Upgrade 4-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly to 6-inch EA $ 4,000.00 $ Relocate 6-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly EA $ 1,920.00 $ 3-inch Water Service EA $ 2,400.00 $ - 1 1/2-inch Water Service EA $ 1,840.00 $ - 1-inch Water Service with submeter 37 EA $ 1,440.00 $ 53,280.00 2-inch Air Vacuum Release Valve EA _ $ 2,800.00 $ - Blind Flange EA ,„$ 480.00 $ -
Relocate Existing Water meter EA $ 480.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Service 497 LF $ 44.00 $ 21,868.00 Backflow Device 1 EA $ 2,240.00 $ 2,240.00 8-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 5,600.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 4,800.00 $ - 4-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 4,000.00 $ - 4-inch Modified Blow-Off Assembly EA $ 2,160.00 $• - Blow Off Assembly EA $ 2,160.00 $
Recycled Water Line, Irrigation LF $6" Hot Tap EA $ 1,000.00 $ - Total for Water Improvements $ 138,108.00
By: Raymond J Allard _
Water Drawing Number(s):GP 18-15

Estimate of Cost for
Public Storm Drain Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Storm Drain Items Quantity Unit Price Amount 18-inch PVC 108 LF $ 100.00 $ 10,800.00 24-inch RCP , IF $ 116.00 $
30-inch RCP IF $ 124.00 $ -
36-inch RCP LF $ 152.00 $ -
I 42-inch RCP LF $ 170.00 $ - 48-inch RCP IF $ 192.00 $ -
54-inch RCP LF $ 220.00 $
60-inch RCP IF $ 256.00 $ -
72-inch RCP EA $ 375.00 $ -
8-inch HDPE 352 LF $ 32.00 $ 11,264.00 12-inch HDPE 112 LF $ 36.00 $ 4,032.00 Standard Manhole EA $ 3,600.00 $ -
Junction Structure(with manhole) EA $ 2,880.00 $ - Junction Structure(without manhole) LF $ 2,000.00 $ - 4'Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 4,000.00 $ - 7'Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 4,800.00 $ - 10'Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 5,600.00 $ - 14'Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 6,800.00 $ _ - 21'Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 7,600.00 $ - Concrete Collar EA $ 1,200.00 $ - Clean Out EA $ 1,200.00 $ -
Curb Inlet/Outlet EA $ 2,000.00 $ - Bio-Swale LF $ 7.00 $ -
12"x12" Box Inlet EA $ 800.00 $ - 18"x18"or 24"x24" Box Inlet 2 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00 Total for Storm Drain Improvements $ 28,496.00
By:

Storm Drain Drawing Number(s):

Raymond!Allard

Estimate of Cost for
Traffic Improvements
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Traffic Improvements Quantity Unit Price Amount 4" Painted Broken Stripes LF $ 1.60 $ - 4" Painted Double Solid Stripes LF $ 0.40 $ - 6" Painted Bike Lane Stripes LF $ 0.60 $ - Painted One-Way,No Passing LF $ _ 0.30 $ - I Painted Two-Way,Left Turn Lane LF $ 0.70 $ - Painted Pavement Markings . SF $ 2.40 $ - 8"Thermoplastic Channelizing Line LF $ 1.60 $ - 12"Thermoplastic Crosswalk&Limit Line LF $ 2.40 $ - Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF $ 3.20 $ - Street Name Sign&Post EA $ 240.00 $ -
Stop Sign&Post EA $ 240.00 $ -
Road Sign on existing pole/post(One Post) EA $ 160.00 $ - Road Sign on existing pole/post(Two Post) EA $ 240.00 $ - Street Sign(Mast Arm Hanger Method) EA $ 400.00 $ - Remove Painted Stripes&Pavement Markings SF $ 2.40 $ - Remove Thermoplastic Stripes&Pavement Markings _ SF $ 4.00 $ - Traffic Signal&Lighting-New Installation LS $ 240,000.00 $ - TrafPic Signal&Lighting-Modification LS $ 160,000.00 $ - Type E-6'Round Signal Loops EA $ 480.00 $ - Type D-6'Square Loops with bike detection zone EA $ 640.00 $ - Install Pull Box(#5) EA $ 400.00 $ - -I Install Pull Box(#6) EA $ 560.00 $ - install Pull Box(#6E) EA $ 640.00 $ - 2"Conduit IF $ 20.00 $ -
—
3"Conduit LF $ 24.00 $ -
3"PVC Conduit(for Fiber Optic Cable only) LF $ 24.00 $ - 24 Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable LF $ 3.20 $ - 12 Pair Interconnect Cable LF $ 4.00 $ - Bike Loops EA $ 240.00 $ -
Video Detection Camera&Processor EA , $ 4,000.00 $ - Traffic Signal Cabinet(Caltrans 332) EA $ 15,000.00 $ - Total for Traffic Improvements $ -
By: Raymond J Allard
Drawing Number(s): GP 18-15

I •
Estimate of Cost for
Public Miscellaneous Improvements and Final Monuments
Developer: GFR Homes(20151 LLC)
Project: Tract 20151
Location: Foothill East of Benson
Miscellaneous Items Quantity Unit Price Amount $
$
$
$ -
$
$
$
$ -
$ _
$ _
$ -
Total for Miscellaneous Improvements $
By:

Miscellaneous Drawing Number(s):

Miscellaneous Final Monuments _ Quantity Unit Price Amount Monumentation per lot(refundable) 6 EA $ 700.00 $ 4,200.00 $ -
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ -
$ _
$ -
Total for Final Monuments $ 4,200.00
By: Raymond 1 Allard
Final Map Number: Tract 20151

AREA:2.560 ACRES(GROSS) IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS (BEING ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO.20151)
NUMBERED LOTS: 1 TRACT NO . 20151
L:`
PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4829, IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 45 OF MAPS, PAGE 79, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1511, IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 18 OF MAPS, PAGE 22, BOTH RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

ALLARD ENGINEERING JANUARY, 2019

FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
OWNERS STATEMENT: SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SUBDIVIDED THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED MAP,AND WE CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS FINAL MAP. REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF GFR ENTERPRISES IN DECEMBER,2018.I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS TRACT MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR 20151 LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY,AND THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN SUCH POSITIONS WITHIN 24 MONTHS FROM THE FILING DATE OF THIS MAP,AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. 114•41 gia./ .•
DATED I0///tq A013.

LNyyDq�'Q�FELIZARDO LES,JR., 's,: �,�TRUSTEE OF THE FELIZARDO ROBLES LIVING TRUST j p (1`Z 73 DATED JUNE 10,2014 Q. .-)e . La'''' * EXP. 12/31/19 * Nj, No. 8244 s
BENEFICIARY DAVID B.WARREN,LS 8244 ii, ' HOMESTREET BANK,A WASHINGTON STATE CHARTERED COMMERCIAL BANK,BENEFICIARY UNDER DEED OF TRUST OF CAL RECORDED JULY 25,2019 AS DOCUMENT NO.2019-0250314,OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY •
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:

Vic.r Pm;len4-
BY:A(giN.A14.
0 RESIDENT l I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP,AND THAT THE SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE

SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF,AND THAT ALL PROVISV IS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND THE CITY OF UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODES HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WI £ "' NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT - : � µ.

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO 1 2 fG ,5

SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED,AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,ACCURACY,OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT. ROSEMARY H ERNING DATE:

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS STATE OF CALIF RNIA CITY OF UPLAND• R.C.E.44766,EXPIRES 03/31/2020

COUNTY OF
a(/z a/� 44- D-��E ;I� APPLICABLE GENERAL OR SPETHE ATTACHED MAP ON THE CIFIC PLANS OF THEi DAY OF E �CITYUPLAND.I4,AND FOUND THIS MAP TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ON l0(et solq BEFORE ME,I�M� K/,*4• _ A NOTARY PUBLIC,PERSONALLY APPEAREDIWHO PROVED TO ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S)IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO , i b I

THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES),AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S)ON THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S),OR THE KEPI JO SON DATE:

ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S)ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. CITY CLERK,CI OF U D,CALIFORNIA

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS u LiNfribma 461te4o44414/-romc touscnos.`s t•6pl ten TRUE AND CORRECT.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THI.OFFICE,AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. REAL PROPERTY SHOWN UPON THIS MAP FOR UNPAID STATE,COUNTY,MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES,SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES,EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS NOT YET PAYABLE, ESTIMATED TO BE$ e,500'00 . 1144 YLMS Ko.Wsi- 9 MQp
PRINT NAME *1.3.114k240 IGN RE 1;11-11114441° 1.i%q l?(q ENSEN MASON,COUNTY AUDITOR- MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: cj' la- #2423 DATE CONTROLLER/TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN Qt.tar E. COUNTY. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIGNATURE OMISSIONS: BY: 4 /4ADEPUTY PURUSANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT,THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S CERTIFICATE AND/OR OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED:

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF$ S.500'O° HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF THE SIGNATURE OF THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE POMONA LAND AND WATER COMPANY,THE OWNERS OF RIGHTS OF WAY FOR SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,CONDITIONED UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, WATER PIPELINES FOR THE CARRIAGE OF WATER,AS RECORDED JULY 12, 1907 IN BOOK 395,PAGE 282 OF DEEDS,OFFICIAL (STATE,COUNTY,MUNICIPAL,OR LOCAa AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS,COLLECTED AS TAXES,WHICH AT THE TIME OF FILING RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. OF THIS A NEXED'MAP WITH THE COUNTA6GAfBER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY,BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND THAT

THE SUBDIVIDER HAS FILED WITH ME A CERTIFICATE BY THE PROPER OFFICER GIVING HIS ESTIMATE OF THE AMOUNT OF SAID THE SIGNATURE OF THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF LEMON HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY,THE OWNERS OF AN EASEMENT FOR TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS,AND SAID BOND IS HEREBY ACCEPTED.

PIPELINES,AS RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1914 IN BOOK 561,PAGE 273 OF DEEDS,OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. Of SAkt4 Sow164.KM° ML fU . -I 4CORbi$- eatany CLiI l dl A H-WALCI4 L'i kw 1401/Il)
DAT CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
BY: 11 LA ADEPUTY
I

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE
THIS MAP HAS/�� BEEN FILED UNDER DOCUMENT NUMBER 20IQ-Q y qo g q THIS 2V DAY OF a-CEMbeR. ,2019,AT 10:22 A.M.IN BOOK 3514 OP TRXT OF MAPS AT PAGE(S) To 191 ,AT THE REQUEST OF IOCUMEHT P ESSI &LOTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF$ II .00 .

BOB DUTTON
J ASSESSOR-RECORDER- 9W t`CERIE c< Pie/ PO COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY:

DEPUTY RECIRDER

IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET2OF2SHEETS TRACTNO . 20151 .....,,
N.

PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4829, IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 45 OF MAPS, - ON PAGE 79, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1511, IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 18 OF MAPS, PAGE 22, BOTH RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OFCALIFORNIA..li'.

C
v1 ALLARD ENGINEERING JANUARY, 2019 SCALE: 1"=60' FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
FD.MAG SPIKE&WASHER,
FD.RR SPIKE PER PMB 45/79, ILLEGIBLE, IN LIEU OF RR SPIKE PER FLUSH 1 3 t h STREET MB 320/74-77,FLUSH £L N 89°45'52"E 3227.70'(N 89°45'13"E 3227.72')[N 89°45'25"E 3227.801 _ i 0-
1 N 89°45'52"E 3144.56'
428.94'([429.041] 329.92'[[3301] �'2385.70 j\1- IL 1 t it
1 33' a i C n �� 50 k~�N v .- _ E 1(NO C Il E U G Il Il - 1-1 /�'Zl IC - N F-I 1co I c,01 c.0 to
MI '3 is 17/77 - 7 g alI ti I I� [ T 1i 5 � Oo - 1 94CO 1 i
N 89°45'45"E 3141.93'(N 89°45'06"E)[[3142.22']]
425.93'[[425.9T� 329.97'[[330']]
' 202.00'fc_ -At 2386.03'
333.93'(333.93') 92.00'(92.00') 100.00'((100.00')) [[2386.25']]� 102.00'(102.00')
M 1 I FD.L&T,RCE 21649 IN TOP
N ki OF WALL PER CR 306/35, CO 0.54'NORTH x 0.40'WEST
1 OF TRUE POSITION I rn i
N yI 1 a' IV
8 1 1 W13
Z I N k
W N z O
co 8
W Q
S 1 PALACE_ 1 PAPCLO 2 0 MACE_ 1 PAPCE_ 2 13 CM
g LO
op
g 8
O cm"
N S
04 1 N to a0 IZ o a_ - CV
N O g Q)CNI d E.
vl rn Z ' §CO
Z I�
Z i z 3
g a 3 U N
cc
:Ea
_
ZO m (3 v- QaM
gm 0o O
Z w Z z S w Z 8 Z z z
U N P)Z F- Z O
Iz
W < N Ng U) S - D �y� ti W C CO W 0 ti N W N 0 w co" u O O ? 0 $I i ,U)in I- O) CAD- L 1 N CO ~8 O F- co N N CD j z 8 �yJ tO CD CZ Z
I
1 1
I I

CURVE DATA TABLE

CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH TANGENT
C1 119.00' 24°57'05" 51.82' 26.33'
(119.00') (24°57'05") (51.82') L 0 T 1 1 C2 181.00' 24°57'05" 78.82' 40.05' 2.56 AC (NET) 1 (181.00') (24°57'05") (78.82')
1 C3 181.00' 0°49'17" 2.59' 1.30' I (181.00') (0°49'18") (2.60') I
, I
ti
'�c- FD.L&T,RCE 16531 PER
`� MB 320/74-77,FLUSH
Y 0.16'SOUTH OF LINE

ON LINE EAST-WEST
C2�
(49.42')

49.42' 100.00'((100.00'))
- -/ C3 N 89°45'38"E 149.42' r T
33' h' 1 50' (")i 'v
cM Cq
ti
0 2386.36'
422.92'[[422.901 330.02'[[3301] ([2386.251], • N 89°45'38"E 3139.29'[[3139.15]]
CM5)
S) C")
565.76'(565.74')[565.801 220.02' 2436.38'[2436.50'] - CL 1 785.78'[785.831
FOOTHILL N 89°45'38"E 3222.16'(N 89°45'00"E 3221.82')[N 89°45'06"E 3222.33'] BOULEVARD FD.SPIKE&WASHER, FD.SPIKE&WASHER, FD.RR SPIKE PER PMB 45/79, RCE 16531 PER MB 320/74-77, FD.SPIKE&WASHER,RCE 16531 FLUSH FLUSH RCE 21649 PER MB 335/1-7,FLUSH PER MB 320/74-77,FLUSH

0.29'WEST x 0.09'SOUTH OF TRUE 0.14'SOUTH OF LINE, POSITION HELD FOR LINE EAST-WEST
BASIS OF BEARINGS: SURVEYOR'S NOTES:

THE BEARING OF N 00°24'25"E AS SHOWN FOR THE • INDICATES MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED CENTERLINE OF BENSON AVENUE ON PARCEL MAP 4829,
RECORDED IN BOOK 45 OF PARCEL MAPS,PAGE 79,RECORDS 0 INDICATES 1"IRON PIPE, 18"LONG,SET AND TAGGED WITH BRASS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF TAG STAMPED LS 8244,SET FLUSH TO SURFACE BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP.

FD. INDICATED FOUND
(XXX) INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PMB 45/79
•
EASEMENT NOTE: ((XXX)) INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PMB 18/22

AVIGATION EASEMENT DEDICATED TO CABLE AIRPORT AS
SHOWN IN DOCUMENT RECORDED ,AS pooq INDICATES RECORD DATA PER MB 320/74-77 INSTRUMENT NO. ,SAID EASEMENT
AFFECTS ALL PARCELS AND IS NOT PLOTTABLE. [[ ]] INDICATES RECORD DATA PER MB 17/77-78 J

, �pl"� CITY FUPLAND
'5, _i• "The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krctilt
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:CHRIS ALANIS,INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

ALAN FRENCH,PRINCIPAL ENGINEER

YESENIA DIAZ,ASSISTANT ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 20366 RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council accept the improvements for Tract Map 20366 and reduce the improvement bonds to 25%.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to adhere to a review schedule for the processing of development proposals in an efficient,professionally responsive,and courteous manner.

BACKGROUND
On February 24,2021 the Planning Commission conditionally approved Resolution 4940 which included Tract Map 20366, a subdivision of land that included 192 residential units comprised of 116, 2-Story detached condominiums and 76 attached townhomes on 19.04 acres.It is part of the Enclave Specific Plan(Enclave)by Lewis Homes generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north,Dewey Way on the west, 11th Street on the south, and Benson Avenue on the east. The Enclave Specific Plan is composed of two types of residential units. Tract Map 20366 is located on the property that was conveyed to Lennar Homes(Lennar)from the Lewis Group.

On December 13,2021,the City Council approved the Tentative Tract Map 20366 for recordation,authorize execution of the Subdivision Agreement and accepted the bonds for improvements.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
In conformance with the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 4940 by the Planning Commission, Lennar Homes has completed the improvements required for the development. The City has inspected the completed improvements and found them to be in compliance with the conditions of approval and approved plans. The City can now accept the off-site improvements and reduce the Performance Bond to 25%.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the Upland Municipal Code and the City's local CEQA Implementation Guidelines,the Planning Commission found that the Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Case No.EAR 20-0006 was accurate,objective,complete,and in compliance with the Guidelines for Implementation of the CEQA Guidelines and Procedures of the State of California and the City of Upland and represented the independent judgment of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission reviewed all documents comprising the Final Development Service Department's recommendation, (I) found the Final Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was adequate and complete and(II) certified said Final Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration to be in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15074 and 15162.

FISCAL IMPACTS
With this action,the City is accepting 75%of approximately$4,294,710(see attached engineer's estimate)in public improvement capital assets,which will be added to the City's infrastructure inventory and will be maintained by the City going forward.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Final Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration is in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15074 and 15162.

q CITY OF UPLAND
4 t . . _.."; "� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ,
i ND DEVELOPMENT & TRANSPORTATION DIVISION
� 7 S COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY SHEET
Public Improvements

BOND AMOUNT CALCULATION
Developer: Lennar Homes of California, Inc.

Project: Enclave at Upland Tract No. 20366
Location: Upland, California
Item Description Estimated Cost
1 . Street Improvements — ✓R-4-6 $ 723,790.00 Sewer Improvements — Piro/ "'. $ 540,808.00 Water Improvements — '&tM i C $ 840,770.00
z Rough Grading & Drainage —�abLiC' $ 823,162.00 as o 0 cJ Storm Drain Improvements — iFY 't ' $ 619,170.00 c Retaining Walls & Combo Walls for Rough - r' YI.�/k�G $ 747,010.00 2 0 N Grading and Perimeter Freestanding Block Walls 0 o O Grand Total $ 4,294,710.00 w cc CC
20%Contingency $ 858,942.00
0 o a,
p $ 5,153,652.00
� a Bond Amount
z z
J Q Faithful Performance (100%) $ 4,294,710.00 y Labor and Materials (50%) $ 2,147,355.00 m
c $
4 t O=final Monuments
a Cash Deposit required for monuments)
.44 e. 4 a
,to „,, 0101114 QROEESS/0N
ti`����pdN hit, D 9(<4'
SCE#: C 83898
Date: 05/26/2021 c C 83898 m
Bond amounts will be calculated by the Developer's Engineer and reviewed by the l Ci V\\- Public Works Department. inspection fee deposits shall be paid prior to issuance of permit. qTF' �fi CA��cO`�'

PROJECT OR TRACT NUMBER SUBDIVIDER Job No.20-2317 Enclave of Upland
TRACT MAP NO.20366

ROUGH GRADING&EROSION CONTROL
ENGINEER CALCULATED BY
ADAMS STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS,INC.
16755 Von Karman,Suite 150,IRVINE,CA 92606
DATE 5/4/2021

STREET IMPROVEMENTS-ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT AMOUNT
COST

STREET CONSTRUCTION
1 0" PCC Curb 3,300 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 33,000.00 2 4" PCC Curb 620 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 6,200.00 3 4" PCC Rolled Curb 3,295 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 32,950.00 4 6" PCC Curb 2,650 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 26,500.00 5 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 2,250 L.F. $ 14.00 $ 31,500.00 6 5' transition from 0" to 6 ' PCC Curb 35 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 350.00 7 5' transition from 6" Curb to 6 ' Curb and Gutter 5 L.F. $ _ 14.00 $ 70.00 8 4" Rolled PCC Curb to 6" Curb transition 10 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 100.00 9 4" Rolled PCC Curb to 6" Curb and Gutter transition 25 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 250.00 10 Driveway Approach 3,030 S.F. $ 10.00 $ 30,300.00 11 PCC Sidewalk 13,500 S.F. $ 7.00 $ 94,500.00 12 4" AC Pavement over 4" CAB 186,315 S.F.
4" AC Pavement(1441bs/CF) 186315x.33/144 427 TON $ 95.00 $ 40,565.00 4" CAB (186315x.33)/27= 2,277 CY $ 55.00 $ 125,235.00 13 Median Decorative Hardscape _ 735 S.F. $ 12.00 $ 8,820.00 14 Concrete Pavers Over Aggregate Base 6,370 S.F. $ 20.00 $ 127,400.00 15 Curb Ramp, Case B 8 E.A. $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 16 Curb Ramp 12 E.A. $ 2,000.00 $ 24,000.00 17 Curb Ramp, Case D 20 E.A. $ 2,000.00 $ - 40,000.00 18 19 -
-
20 3' transition from 0" to 4 ' PCC Curb 75 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 750.00 21 Parking Stall Striping _ 1,03.0 L.F. $ 3.00 $ 3,090.00 22 ADA Parking Stall Blue Striping and Signage 2 E.A. $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 23 Detectable warning surface _ 1,230 S.F. $ 10.00 $ 12,300.00 24 Street Name Sign _ 32 E.A. $ 200.00 $ 6,400.00 R-1 Sign with thermal plastic stop legend and 12" limit 25 line 32 E.A. $ 300.00 $ 9,600.00 26 Blue Dot Pavement Marker 16 E.A. $ 20.00 $ 320.00 27 12"x12" Catch Basin Brooks product 1212CB 41 E.A. $ 1,000.00 $ 41,000.00 28 2" Local Depression (Case "E") 2 E.A. $ 500.00 $ 1.000.00 29 Gate per Landscape (NAP)

STREET DEMOLITION
41 Sawcut and remove existing concrete driveway 645 S.F. $ 10.00 $ 6,450.00

EROSION CONTROL
51 EC-10 Velocity Dissipation(2 bags x 120=240 L.F.) 240 L.F. $ 1.50 $ 360.00 SE-10 Storm Drain Inlet Protection Device (3 rows x 40' 52 =120 LF) 120 L.F. $ 1.50 $ 180.00 53 TC-1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit 2 E.A. $ 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00 TOTAL $ 723,790.00

PROJECT OR TRACT NUMBER OR ADDRESS PLAN CHECK NUMBER:

Enclave at Upland SS 21-01
Tract 20366
ENGINEER CALCULATED BY
ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. EDUARDO CERDA

CHECKED BY

BRANDON DIEDA
DATE OWNER/DEVELOPER
May 3, 2021 Lennar Homes of California, Inc.

SEWER IMP. PLAN ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE
Sewer Manholes(48-inch Diameter) 30 EA @ $ 3,600.00 $ 108,000.00 Sewer Cleanouts 193 EA @ $ 800.00 $ 154,400.00 Sewer Terminal Cleanouts 4 EA @ $ 800.00 $ 3,200.00 4-inch pvc lateral 3,026 LF @ $ 12.00 $ 36,312.00 6-inch pvc lateral 34 LF @ $ 14.00 $ 476.00 8-inch pvc main 5,290 LF @ $ 18.00 $ 95,220.00 8-inch x 4-inch Sewer wye 192 EA @ $ 480.00 $ 92,160.00 8-inch x 6-inch Sewer wye 1 EA @ $ 480.00 $ 480.00 Backflow device 55 EA @ $ 640.00 $ 35,200.00 Adjust Cleanout to grade 4 EA @ $ 240.00 $ 960.00 Adjust Manhole to grade 30 EA @ $ 480.00 $ 14,400.00 TOTAL $ 540,808.00

PROJECT NAME &TRACT NUMBER PLAN CHECK NUMBER:

Enclave at Upland W 21-01
Tract 20366
ENGINEER CALCULATED BY
Adams-Streeter Civil Engineers, Inc. Brandon Dieda DATE OWNER/DEVELOPER
May 26, 2021 Lennar Homes of California, Inc.

ONSITE PUBLIC WATER IMPROVEMENTS ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost
8 CML&C Steel Pipe Water Main 5,811 LF © $ 80.00 $ 464,880.00 8"x12" Tapping Sleeve & Hot Tap Exist. Main 1 EA @ $ 4,300.00 $ 4,300.00 6" Fire Hydrant Service &Assembly 14 EA © $ 4,500.00 $ 63,000.00 1" Domestitc Water Service & Meter 192 EA © $ 1,000.00 $ 192,000.00 2" Air Vacuum Release Valve 5 EA © $ 800.00 $ 4,000.00 8" CML&C Steel Tee 8 EA © $ 500.00 $ 4,000.00 8" CML&C Steel Cross 4 EA © $ 800.00 3,200.00 8" Gate Valve 50 EA © $ 1,300.00 $ 65,000.00 8" 45 Degree Bend 4 EA © $ 250.00 $ 1,000.00 8" 90 Degree Bend 1 EA @ $ 250.00 $ 250.00 4" CML&C Steel Pipe Water Line 96 LF © $ 40.00 3,840.00 8"x10" Tapping Sleeve & Hot Tap Exist. Main 1 EA @ $ 4,300.00 $ 4,300.00 4" Double Detector Check Assembly 4 EA © $ 3,000.00 12,000.00 6" Gate Valve 14 EA © $ 1,100.00 $ 15,400.00 4" Gate Valve 4 EA @ $ 900.00 3,600.00
Total $ 840,770.00

PROJECT OR TRACT NUMBER SUBDIVIDER Job No.20-2317 Enclave of Upland
TRACT MAP NO.20366

ROUGH GRADING&EROSION CONTROL
ENGINEER CALCULATED BY
ADAMS STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS,INC.
16755 Von Karman,Suite 150,IRVINE,CA 92606
DATE 5/4/2021

ROUGH GRADING AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT AMOUNT
COST
SITE EXCAVATION Cut(c) = 123,374 C.Y.

Fill (f) = 124,092 C.Y.

If balance, provide (a.) only, either cut or fill If export, provide (a.)&(b.) a = fill, b = cut-fill If import, provide (a)&(c), a = cut, c= fill -cut
(Unit costs for(a),(b), & (c) are 20% of actual costs to assure that work will be corrected to eliminate hazardous conditions.) (a.) Excavate and Fill 123,374 C.Y. $ 4.00'$ 493,496.00 (b.) Excavate and Export - C.Y. $ 1.10 $ 0.00 (c.) Import and Fill 718 C.Y. $ 2.80'$ 2,010.40 SITE WORK $ $ 0.00
Movilization 1 L.S. $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 4" P.V.C. (SDR-35) 70 L.F. $ 30.00 $ 2,100.00 8" P.V.C. (SDR-35) 2,475 L.F. $ 45.00 $ 111,375.00 24" Concrete V-Ditch 1,945 L.F. $ 45.00 $ 87,525.00 12"x12" Grate Inlet HOT DIP Galvazed #4 Bars 7 EA. $ 300.00 $ 2,100.00 6-Foot wide drainage channel (V-Ditch) 75 SF $ 45.00 $ 3,375.00 Connect to Area Drain System 18 EA. $ 10.00 $ 180.00 EROSION CONTROL $ $ 0.00
EC-1 Scheduling 1 L.S. $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 EC-4 Hydroseeding 24,270 S.F. $ 0.50 $ 12,135.00 SE-6 Gravel Bag Berm (2 rows high x 8,365=16,730 L.F.) 16,730 L.F. $ 1.50 $ 25,095.00 EC-10 Velocity Dissipation(2 rows high x 590=1,180 L.F.) 1,180 L.F. $ 1.50 $ 1,770.00 SE-10 Storm Drain Inlet Protection Device 6 E.A. $ 100.00 $ 600.00 TC-1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit 2 E.A. $ 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00 TC-3 Entrance/Outlet Tire Wash 2 E.A. $ 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00 WE-1 Wind Erosion Control 6,650 L.F. $ 8.00 $ 53,200.00 WM-9 Sanitary/ Septic Waste Management 1 L.S. $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 SE-7 Street Sweeping and Vacuuming 1 L.S. $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 TOTAL $ 823,161.40

PROJECT OR TRACT NUMBER SUBDIVIDER
Enclave of Upland
TRACT MAP NO. 20366

STORM DRAIN
ENGINEER CALCULATED BY
ADAMS STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC.
16755 Von Karman, Suite 150, IRVINE, CA
92606
DATE 5/24/2021

STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS - ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE
Construction
No. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST COST
1 8" HDPE 986 LF @ $ 20.00 $ 19,720.00 2 12" HDPE 2,792 LF @ $ 30.00 $ 83,760.00 3 18"HDPE 866 LF @ $ 130.00 $ 112,580.00 4 24" HDPE 989 LF @ $ 140.00 $ 138,460.00 5 30" HDPE 389 LF @ $ 160.00 $ 62,240.00 6 36" RCP 34 LF @ $ 200.00 $ 6,800.00 7 24" HDPE-45° BEND 4 EA @ $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 8 12"x12" HDPE TEE 2 EA @ $ 400.00 $ 800.00 9 24"x8" HDPE TEE 7 EA @ $ 400.00 $ 2,800.00 10 30"x8" HDPE TEE 2 EA @ $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 11 12"x8" HDPE TEE 24 EA @ $ 300.00 $ 7,200.00 12 18"x8" HDPE TEE 5 EA @ $ 350.00 $ 1,750.00 13 12"x8" HDPE REDUCER 21 EA @ $ 200.00 $ 4,200.00 14 12"x8" HDPE-90° BEND 4 EA @ $ 400.00 $ 1,600.00 15 8" HDPE X 6" PVC PIPE CONNECTION 36 EA @ $ 150.00 $ 5,400.00 16 12" HDPE STORM DRAIN END CAP 9 EA @ $ 400.00 $ 3,600.00 CATCH BASIN INSERT FILLER(KriStar PRODUCTS TYPE
17 FG-CI) 43 EA @ $ 400.00 $ 17,200.00 MANHOLE(MAINLINE 33"OR SMALLER) PER SPPWC NO.
18 321-2 11 EA @ $ 4,500.00 $ 49,500.00 MANHOLE(MAINLINE 36"OR LARGER) PER SPPWC NO.
19 320-2 1 EA @ $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 20 CATCH BASIN 2 EA @ $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 2" LOCAL DEPRESSION (PART OF STREET
21 IMPROVEMENTS) 2 EA @ N.A.P. N.A.P.

HDPE TO CONCRETE STRUCTURE CONNECTION WATER
22 TIGHT WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT 39 EA @ $ 100.00 $ 3,900.00 23 8" HDPE DRAIN LATERAL CONNECTION AT CATCH BASIN 1 EA @ $ 150.00 $ 150.00 24 36" RCP PIPE CONNECTION TO EXISTING 90" RCP PIPE 1 EA @ $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 25 8"STORM DRAIN PIPE END CAP 7 EA @ $ $ 30.00 210.00 26 PIPE, 4" PVC 2,275 LF @ $ 20.00 $ 45,500.00 27 4" STORM DRAIN PIPE END CAP 136 EA @ $ $ 20.00 2,720.00 28 12"x4" HDPE TEE 6 EA @ $ 250.00 $ 1,500.00 29 6" PVC PIPE 15 LF @ $ 30.00 450.00 30 12" PVC PIPE 328 LF @ $ 30.00 9,840.00 31 18"x4" HDPE TEE 29 EA @ $ $ 300.00 8,700.00 32 24"x12" HDPE TEE 1 EA @ $ $ 400.00 400.00 33 18"TO 8"WYE CONNECTION 1 EA © $ $ 400.00 400.00 34 INSTALL" NO DUMPING DRAIN TO OCEAN" 43 EA @ $ 30.00 1,290.00 35 CONNECT TO AREA DRAIN SYSTEM, SEPARATE PLAN 10 EA @ $ 200.00 2,000.00 36 INSTALL 12"X4" HDPE REDUCER 5 EA @ $ 200.00 1,000.00 TOTAL $ 619,170.00
rage b3 of 219

PROJECT OR TRACT NUMBER SUBDIVIDER Job No.20-2317 Enclave of Upland
TRACT MAP NO.20366

ROUGH GRADING&EROSION CONTROL
ENGINEER CALCULATED BY
ADAMS STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS,INC.
16755 Von Karman,Suite 150,IRVINE,CA 92606
DATE 5/13/2021

RETAINING & BLOCK WALL FOR RG PLAN ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE Construction
Notes ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT 6' high slumpstone CMU privacy wall with
1 retaining
CMU Privacy Wall 1,385 S.F. $ 15.00 $ 20,775.00 CMU Retaining Wall 940 S.F. $ 30.00 $ 28,200.00 8' high slumpstone CMU privacy wall with
2 retaining
CMU Privacy Wall 4,920 S.F. $ 15.00 $ 73,800.00 CMU Retaining Wall 1,220 S.F. $ 30.00 $ 36,600.00 3 8' high slumpstone CMU privacy wall 8,430 S.F. $ 15.00 $ 126,450.00 4 12' high slumpstone CMU privacy wall 4,420 S.F. $ 15.00 $ 66,300.00 8' high slumpstone CMU privacy wall with
5 retaining
CMU Privacy Wall 4,680 S.F. $ 15.00 $ 70,200.00 CMU Retaining Wall 1,690 S.F. $ 30.00 $ 50,700.00 Slumpstone CMU combination retaining wall
6 with tubular fence 2,185 S.F. $ 31.00 $ 67,735.00 Slumpstone CMU combination retaining wall
7 with vinyl fence (wall only) 5,200 S.F. $ 30.00 $ 156,000.00 8 Slump CMU retaining wall 20 S.F. $ 30.00 $ 600.00 9 4" PVC sleeve through wall 10 EA. $ 40.00 $ 400.00 10 12" high Slump CMU Pilaster 1 EA. $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 11 8'-8" high Slump CMU Pilaster with retaining 15 EA. $ 1,500.00 $ 22,500.00 4" Perforated PVC SCH. 40 pipe for
14 retaining wall subdrain 2,475 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 24,750.00 TOTAL $ 747,010.00

c, oiu - -1?-inu a() __„„
NL�REDLOTS:T11 i306 EXP. 72/31/22
- ¢
No.56756 15
LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNN. INC., I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT A CALIFCAYNI CORPIOWIIIOFT /yA Q�a '}J"J'
BY: � .— BY' DATED: 1�,IIdr 21 BY: F v�- „"` MICHAEL P.
f THORNTON
NAME. AR..?W LIP y L.. 6'+MM NAME: L.S.NC. 6867 EXP.9/30/22 us: ,..xs.,6 Pte3W6 Ner ITS'
u
v°wi,rke',....:‘,1
a
. u
BENEFICIARY No.8067'
LEWIS LAND DEVELOPERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY rap.H/.30/22 BENEFICIARY UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED APRIL 13, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT N0. A �� w4�
2021-0167967, AND INSTRUMENT NO 2021-0167968, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. C1.1. o BY: LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORP.,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION -ITS MANAGER CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE: •

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED MAP IS IN ACCORDANCE WfIT�H DIE N DTkka �ENTATIVE MAP REVIEWED AT A MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSFODL THE CITY P
' / COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,HELD ON TH AY OF BY. /1 OF 2021,
NAME pia
1T5. U.I AUTHORIZED AGENT DATED: _41 L••a

BORER DA QUEST

SECRETARY OF PLANN G COMMISSION OTT OF

UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: CITY CLERKS CERTIFICATE:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLANpyBY A MOT1 Y",� COUNTY OF WA, SE NDED AND PASSED,APPROVED THE ATTACHED MAP ON THE 10 DAY OF LF6Y1'ri' NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE 2 AND ACCEPTED FOR PUBLIC USE THE DEDICATIONS THEREIN OFFERED AND OUND TRIO A
IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS MA TO BE CONSISTENT WITH APPUCABLE GENERAL OR SPECIFIC PLANS OF THE CITY OF UPLAND.

ATTACHED,AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,ACCURACY. OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT. 3 ON,1 50.20 ,BEFORE ME,E,�N!,C_tkMA11111IIB'ERSONALLY APPEARED, ��1 II /r�i.�NtilI1JR/I^'�S
�_CsflOdiWwoi� _ __ _ DATED:No
PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR,PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE)) XERI JOH TO BE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND CITY CLERK, CITY OF UPLAND,CAUFORNIA

ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES,

AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON, THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS, OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' CERTIFICATE:

I CERTIFY THAT UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE }.A.WS.0E' THE STATE .SIT„v CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. a ""- r I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF$ qa,See HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF AIC COUNTY O[ SAN • �a,a.1 � { Ir A.,au„ BERNARDINO}STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES,ISTATE. `_TIE C we t+wu. COUNTY MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL) AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS,COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH SIG TURF OF NOTARY DATE COMMISSION EXPIRES s'Y,w�9aR, AT THE TIME OF FILING OF 11-16ANNEINCE MAP WITH'HIE IM5Y-14CGFBFR ARE A IJEN Unnw,M•13176L,
w6.".".3 AnV:F. AGAINST SAID PROPERTY. OUT NOT YET PAYAULE AND THAT THE SUBDIVIDER HAS FILED WITH S1NIat VW,`Nosy-, ion OreAM\Q ME A CERTIFICATE BY THE PROPER OFFICER GIVING HIS ESTIMATE OF THE AMOUNT OF SAID NAME OF NOTARY PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. AND SAID BONG IS HEREBY ACCEPTED.

COMMISSION NO. 2.'b21Q12-1/4
DATED: I2/If02L BY.

WUa.3 T4 LAURA--141-1VEL-BFF L5 ,,, MFn16 LL
SWIM 6ir-NABD6^1'E CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SAN �,a+Nr`d ^�LiFSD0- BERNARDINO COUNTY
ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: ascoR.c to-'e"01"'" ��v
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND BASED UPON A FIELD CypFIL BY: ""/ u DEPUTY SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND - LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION IN APRIL, 2021. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE Amoa6y_Cv.rfneula/roe1F 1-0,4 ACuR6a./7'A'SoiAs c3.RA CART IF:to r6 POSITIONS WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF THE DATE OF RECORDATION OF THIS MAP AND THAT SAID AUDITOR'S SERTIi1CATE:

MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO RE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF TH6 OFFICE AS OF THIS DATE, TENTATIVE MAP. THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE REAL PROPERTY SHOWN UPON THIN ARHE/4EB MAP FOR

UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES DR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED �fr'�� OvoEssopi( AS TJS]CESt�CEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS NOT YET PAYABLE ESTIMATED TO BE ANTED: 11/18/21 BY 44, �OP�L Sj���� ��
L STREETER RCE 5083 c
REGI TION EXPIRES 12/31/2021. W 4 Na?SOBS ,
DATED: IZ/fslleti BY:
*�.I/ISVTI /1H ENSEN MASON, AUDITOR-CONTROLLER/
'Pei' C144L I• TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR
-,4- CAL�F�` SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,6AIJFORNIA. or pr. Y _e%°' ,DEPUTY
SOILS REPORT:

PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 96434(0 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAE ACT, A SAN COLNTY liECORDBie8 TE, SOILS REPORT BY RMA GROUP,DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2019,HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS INS MAP HAS EN FLLLD+1N R DOCI�!EN�T No.. -61�d`6�� SUBDIVISION AND IS ON FILE WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF UPLAND. FILED THIS Y OF Attar 20 AT if IN NOON1DI OF wad-(11 AT P SJ
Al THE REODEST OF .11.11 r
FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF$ i.0

ROB HUTTON
NOTE: ASSESSOR/RECOROLR

1. SEE SHEET 2 FOR SIGNATURE OMISSIONS AND ADDITIONAL NOTARY ACKNOIW.FDO NT, SAN,9ERNAR0.'NO COUNTY L - S7GNE°: DEPUTY RECORDER Page 65 IY 219
IN.20-231)

LETTERREDDLOTS: f f TRACT MAP NO. 20366 SHEET 2 OF fO SHEETS

11.76.E ACRES

IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOW A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 f, 22. 23 AND A PORTION.OF LOT 12 OF COLLEGE HEIGHTS TRACT AS SHOWN, BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 17, PAGES 77 AND 78 OF MOPS NV R#E OFFICE C TILE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 2021

FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS:

PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436(0)(3)(A)(i)OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES HAVE BEEN OMITTED. THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT

RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE

1. DEL MONTE IRRIGATION COMPANY, A CORPORATION,HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR

LAYING PIPES FOR THE CARRYING OF WATER AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1893 IN BOOK 177, PAGE 142, OF DEEDS,

2. THE POMONA LAND AND WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION,HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT

FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ONE LINE OF

PIPE FOR THE CARRIAGE OF WATER AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES,RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1899 IN BOOK 273,PAGE 129 OF DEEDS.

3. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY,ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED MARCH 16, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO.1 989-9 01 92, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO 1989-485519,AND AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19B9-4R5520,ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

4. GTE CALIFORNIA INC.HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRIC ENERGY FOR COMMUNICATION AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES,RECORDED AUGUST 2D, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 1991-316464,OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,

5. THE POMONA LAND AND WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION,HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT

FOR RIGHT OF WAY OVER AND ACROSS ALL OF PROPERTY HEREIHBEFORE DESCRIBED

FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PIPE AND PIPELINES FOR THE CARRIAGE

OF WATER ON AND AVER SAID LANDS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES,AS SET FORTH IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 28,1958 IN BOOK 632,PAGE 390 OF DEEDS,

6. THE POMONA LAND AND WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION.HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT

FOR CONSTRUCTING,LAYING,REPAIRING,INSPECTING AND MAINTAINING PIPELINES AND

CONDUITS FOR CONDUCTING WATER AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, AS SET FORTH IN AN' INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 8,1918 IN BOOK 633,PAGE 96 OF DEEDS, NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )

COUNTY OF '( )SS

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER'OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE

IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

ON.V ii2 mBEFORE ME, It Walk '�lIC PERSONALLY APPEARED,

PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OH PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE)

TO BE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WTHIN INSTRUMENT AND

ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES, AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON, THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS. OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED.EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY THAT UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA� THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH
�IS TRUE� AND CORRECT.

SIGNATURE OIF NOTARY DATE COMMISSI N EXPIRES
NAME OF NOT RY {{ PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS
COMMISSION ND.aa''ry77.5I

NUMBERED LOSS 14 TF?ACT MAP NO. 20366 SHEET 3 OF 10 SHEETS Lf r I LOTS: r

15.763 ACRESRc�OFD NDT�
() INDICATES RECORD DATA AS NOTED
PAIDIZIJIMAIRELKM IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RI INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PM 17943 P.M.B.216/46-49 10 FOUND 1'IP TAGGED PLS 7E35.7f'BELOW FNI$HED SURFACE.ACCEPTED AS Box A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS r 1, 22. 23 AND A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF COLLEGE HEIGHTS TRACT AS STi01rN. R2 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PM 4739 P.M.B.44/533-59 THE C/L NIERSECIICN OF FDOTH61 BLVD.E MONTE VISTA AYE.PER Rs 93 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PM 6013 P ALB,57/1-2 ®FOUND TWIP ND TAG FLUSH.ACCEPTED AS THE C/L HEMMER OF SY MAP ON FILE 1N 800K 17, PACES 77 AND 78 OF MAIM IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF S4N R4 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PM 15288 P.M.B.199/34-35 ELEVENTH STREET d MONTE VISTA AVE_PER RI BERN RDINO COUNTY R5 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT N0.18249 M.B.345/57-62 Q iNA �SETCP LIE GA N1ER5ECTaH OFCTR LLAVEAELEVENTHTREER111 ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 2021 R6 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT NO.1E1274 M.B.351/95-100 ® FOUND 11P NO TAG.ACCEPTED AS THE C/L INTERSECTION OF FOOTD8UL MN) R7 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PM 4739 P.M.B.44/56-57 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES&CENTRAL AVE.PER RIRR INDICATES RECORD DATA PER MB 17/77-78 ram 11P TAGGED LS 9106.N0 REFERENCE FUSS-_ACCEPTED AS THE CA M MEASURED INTE'RSEGIEN OF 5550 NTH STREET AND HARVEST AVENUE PER 145 BOUNDARY MAP Cr CALCULATED FROM NLJ FOUND 11P WRH PLASTIC PLUG STAMPED"GIN HEIUG LS 4215' SFN SEARCHED FOUND NOTHING ACCEPTED AS BEING ON 41LY RAY LINE OF DEWY WAY,HELD FOR CNNC PER RI INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ®SEARCNEO FOUND NOTHING.ESTABLISHED BY PRORATION PER R6 O ALL LOT CORNERS WEL BE SET MTh A 1'IRON PPE 1E6 LONG,TAGGED'RfE ® SEARCHED FOUND NOTHING.ESTABLISHED BY NTET4ECTIW W%CF IFINCii 250831.FL09L IN ENE ESUIT THE POSITION OF THE REAR LOT CORNERS FALLS THE BASIS OF BEARN MS FOR 5 MANLY15 THE CALIFORNLA 000RMN61E 5Y51EIA.RAD B3(20110000 OFFSET ON THE•R10.0NGAlIgY THE 510E NES.BILL� A 1.!)o-' SET CR
NOTES: EPOCH).ZONE 5.AS OEIERMi805 IfrJI1Y RV A TIE BETWEEN CONTWVDUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATERS120• 80• 0. 120' 240' SET SHAD AND TAD,HARKED'RI 2'AH3'N TOP OF CONCRETE CURB AT ICE

1. SEE SHET 4 FOR CPS,N2E%MAP AND EASEMENT N07E5. (COBS)1A000'AND'EIWPP-IS SHOW HEREON. D.E.N 1P5B'26"E)05TANCE$SHORN HEREON ARE PIT LEADAT10N Li 90t m) r �zu31'fl{24R.sr R7}� bb m m
aY a CJ LOT I �- �m^ A�^ 36 DPP ! Iy 16 I v I.DT L4 ErnW 14 1 g O Or^^ '0`6t\''Di I �' I ye p A. SQ O Z��
33'76 4 `` Tar w 0, �,
44,
la �10 o'vS OQvu,O eY as
$ __I 60 o D I r m4^s I P = zo €i -- H-969• N �'°` r. LOT 14 " : v ti A.

Q4 UpT m i
I m .. p ono goo =
t=`� rk, :475:.
c m"' LL un A ~Pp 6= �Qe fT^° Q' Pq.• L� a Z - EAST LINE LOT 11.COLLEGE g' WOES TWIT ESTAIEISTEO E i_ _._.
4 1 I o q Br F470RQICN - - 11 LOT 9
mN ti 5 a , c PCL 1 ^ N .�1 )) 33 4 AOA chi LUT 0 n ,n n v o ..,P m b r/ 010I LINE LDT 12,CBIFts :-+ ' �' of 4 1 - I HEIGHTS TRACT ESTABNSHED k QOQ ,,yY,:a�4 ., � 4a4 o �.PRORATION NO k.

I.r `"'� O b 4"A I I L_ LOT 53 W I R. _ ��� NGRTH DIE LOT 23,00.E0E
31 4a}:Z T4�� .. `4 ` HEIGHTS TWIG( POL 2 E < Q Q /,T�� (330 @ 9
I-
re Q �o �' (..,_
c4 ♦ t - , N�'z4'07'E 330.004*01 NBE124.07,4 244.18'1 z INW2007•E1111 LOT 2 LED A T I LOT IL r (z4a_a8•R7) kg v ♦ I —
iu
I r—
��7Ff O ^ r 1 IOTA 4
= K I 2; PCL 8 '
I g
4 I REST IRE 1.01 21,rI•14PF $ ry ; LOT 6 W.

N40GHT5 TRACT m ry N = 36-
3z2h�^�!!�y ` Im n
0' I
Q4 ^� � I o a �' $ R
VI m
I �bu CCU E.i ]@ LEDs NM § $ Ik $ f
I/ e'A, f Lm A i a A,m�� 18
o ry '`^ c
/
/,T I LOT 2NM Q,O�
dll1+ W. E QOv
IS
I ` ]328 1 LOT A J OOP
f 1 Q
(LOT 1 Loll
0 O 0 I 24'29E'E 330.08''MM 33676'x(330.OD'III)1 1 O 1TOAB'M (330.00'R5) O244.09'M(244.06'Rl} r�� 74547 Y N824'281 661316
. .... 379,25'Y . - ! .a_ - (61D 64'66) -"' - - F1EVfIVTT'I 607.28'Y Slh'Ltl - �.r_ B�.DS'M - 132R.32'M f 1296.34'Y(1296.16'Rt)
N8624)209 2620.66'II 04194363JE 2620.46 It R5) (NBT0657E 242043'pm (IHmI'3r134 262624'R.9 SONAR LINE LOT 22 SOUTH)FIE LOT 23 0 JN-20-2317

WEED LOTS: 14 TRACT MAP NO. 20366 SHEET 4 OF TO SHEETS LETTERED LOTS: 1

15.763 ACRES
IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES BEING A SUBO'l?5ION OF LOTS 11, 22. 23 AND A PORRON OF LOP 12 OF COLLEGE HEIGHTS TRACT AS SHONA 1, AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR BY MAP ON FILE IN W)OK 17. FACES 77 AND 78 OF M4PS 1N THE OFFICE OF TFE COUNTY RECORDER OF SW HIGHWAY.ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED MARCH 3, EASEMENT NOTES 9ERNAR011NO COUNTY 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO.1989-90192, OF OFFICIAL RELuNLI5.

ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 202E 2. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR Q--INDICATES EASEMENT FOR EMERGENCYACCESS AND PUBLICHIGHWAY.ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED DECEMBER

SERVICE VEHICLE
CLE INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES DEDICATED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES HEREON TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 13,1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO 7 989-485519, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. a-INDICATES AN EASEMENT FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND ACCESS GPS AND INDEX MAP 3. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR PURPOSES DEDICATED HEREON TO CITY OF UPLAND PUBLIC WORKS HIGHWAY,ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1989-495520, OF DERMAL RECORDS_ Ca-INDICATES AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC SEWER PURPOSES DEDICATED HEREON TO CITY OF UPLAND PUBLIC WORKS 4. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF GTE CALIFORNIA INC. FOR TRANSMISSION OF ELEI.IQA,ENERGY FOR COMMUNICATION AND INCIDENTAL •
PURPOSES,RECORDED AUGUST 20, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
- SHEET 777 el1 991-31 6 46 4,OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

FOOTHILL BOULEVARD _ - - - -
-- CONS(as DE) COBS EWAP
hi— r M7FtP10'k <989576' NB 7E10 E1880639.8710
L4T 14 k LOT 14 HOT 14 I - - — NUMIMP LOT A —c
LTA 10 ; 1
C ] \

WOULD MOTTO LOT A
I )g ,' \
LDT 4 I \
1 C \MOW WAN LOI A \
I \
LC11 12 I \
SFAENY WIDE � I I 6 \ _
L — — — LOT 3 ---J I lan I11 I :01:-- er_ I qtl 1RD woos IOTA 7` 2\ 9 1111 ME
yg I \-
WOWS MYtAf l LOT A _ EL 7E0' 50_0' 1T0' 740 �^
9 1 (i7APHrC SCALE. 1"-- 124' \
UA 3 LOT 7 6 \
NOTES: \
l ANN 44400) LOT A

1. SEE SHEET 3 FOR 9CUNDART MAP, \
1 MONUMENT NOTES AND SURVEY RECORD \ NUT 70 SCALE

INFORMATION NOTES
IN I ME i, .2 SEE SHEETS 5,fi A 7 FOR MAP SWEETS \ Li L 3 SEE SHEET 0-1C Foil DETAIL \
DEYI[ROP WI A
f ( I \
Lar 1 1AI s f 111E OF BEARINGS \

THE BASIS OF PARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE CAUFDRNW
�( COSNSINATE 551EM,NAD 63(0010.OI00 EPOCH),DONE 5.AS \ ELEVENIN I 5111.'tt! DETERmINEE LOCALLY BY A TE BETWEEN CONTWUwmIY CORE NOCO _ __ - - - OPERAIWC REFERENCE STATIONS(COBS)'HOOT AND'EIPP- \ AS SHOWN HEREON. {I.E N,0'5B'2B'E)OSTANCSS SHORN N6692258.8300 LHEEr s
HEREON ARE GROUND DISTANCES.GRID DISTANCES MAY BE \ E1793435.fi240 J 09TANE6 BY 4UL71PLYING GROUND TSTM'CES BY O.7N11B626.

J N-29-2377

NUMBERED LOTS: 14 TRACT MAP NO. 2036E SHEET 5 Of 10 SHEETS LEREREO Ep LOTS: 1

15.783 ACRES NOTES:

IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1. SEE we1 3 FOR WOW(WA, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 11, 22. 23 AND A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF COLLEGE HEIGHTS TRACT AS SNOW, BASIS OF BEA9INOS,OATH/STATEMENT, BY AMP ON FILE IN BOOK 17• PACES 77 AND 78 OF MAPS. IN THE OfF7CE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF S4N NOTES,MONUMENT NOTES AND SURVEY BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORD INFORMATION RD2Es,.

ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 2021 2. SEE SHEET 4 FOR CPS,INSET MAP AND FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES EASEMENT NOTES.
3, SEE SHEET 8-10 FOR DETAILS.

SEE SHEET 7
i 1. I 1769 2560'_ I f
i s .., 4200' R
C n NBB'S1'N'E PAO -T`v
'O. \ 1469'27'4d'E 4W.W' � 40.16' \ as.93' L.\ 286.60' )a
m r T�\§> 2.45•E 260.07'ICAIONLY Hn10W
n2 �(4:.• _ $ �� c,ti a
LOT A 4,�1 ACRES
- REF O�C7 [ �n6a�vVV 8 n
\ _f M9'27'45-E 399.07' SEE S AIL MEETA6�'✓ - `\`\L`1 ` ¢ N69.24'07•E IN•00 ( �\ 11 NA9.2]'31'E \1_

6.00 �n�
__ IRACT 2A3ss LOT A IR • LOT 11
BWNDARY LOT 3 4.681 ACRES J f• Iz7o AGRFS U 06 1.264 ACRES
LIME TABLE ' $ \ J
LINE NO. DIRECTION LENGTH N072'29.11 97_12' \ C NBB'27'31'E L, N0-32'29-w 16.91' 2`' f' 103.53 f r 62.16' �/ 1a '"27'31 E LOT IA 140.11''.$ 1 A Q
L3 102'27'31'E 26.00' SEE DETAIL'R- 4.681 ACRES :2 �i�J e L6 Na9'24'26'E 24.79' •/ � { I 189'2l'31"f 149.11' �- J i� �M1 �/ L9 1,l8'2]'3l'E•Z6.W' !/ .1l..1 106.65' / T I S g $ N336.53'53• 4C Il1 �143,ST'I 41•N 8 L10 No•32'29•w 41.IB' 1 35yr-w"i ci -, RAO i 0 \ RAD L11 .Ir3'32'29'1 41.16' A ..32'2 1V]5• 3EE DETAIL"G•�� 111 N47'32'29"8 EEE 51EEI 19
A 9.]S' iv
'A ((}
111 C S
CARVE TABLE R O 8 tC LOT 4 ?I IC LOT 8
N 8 z 23,806 SO.FT. 8 2130 21.00',im
NNE RADIOS mTA LEh01N g ¢ 4 I46' .2
Cl 19.00' 25'51'11" 8.57' 36,03 1
BNA19 644.27'31-E SEE DETAIL'1'
C2 26.00' 56'27'07'- 15,91' SEE SIEE]ID
w 3.W' s3 zo's4 z m p r" a'U P 7 2a0 I Nw's7 01 e 2s 94 25.W'•90'W'W' 39.27' 1i;WW V "�� x42.TJL� F 101.52' FAIL,44 sI 1`• 1 _ f.6 25.00' 36'17'98" 16.64' i•3T I 1N9.27'3,•E ,49.1,' �``=J CS 3,00' W PO'00 4.1t' � m ) 1si'b'��= LOT A 2QJT 1 c44 i p 0 4 4. 1 ACRES 1'#'`'N 5
08 40.W' 20'26'11" 14.27' �� I O N69'2 31'E{i 11' /._c, C9 40.00' 22'19'13' 15.56' ....2C 7`"T57.1]' 106.27'}I 'X../ J //_ CIO 40.00' 22'16'42' 15-56' 8�� RRAO ` 1f \[41"49'34-w 1/ 00 C,3 25.00' 32'54'47" 14.36' Cl)i 20.15 SEE LE SIX TALL'QG rl 0EEETAAIL SEE SYEET Q"N'
c14 26.W 5705•14 x4.91' 7 8 C1Q I.0 CIO 3.W' 53'29'53' 2.80' 17 n S f3 i I
C17 25.00' 37'06'06'.16.20' lV T-LLLl IN
'- r 6 LOT 7
GIB 25.00' 01.31.56• 0.67' ED
1-- LOT 3 $ 8
Eu 81.264 ACRES 8CI N e £3
C19 3.00' 69'44'17' 9.70' TB .W 0 g ` .4 C20 29.00' 89'59'48' 39.27' 1 9_. 8 SEE DETAIL'5" LT ` 'g [-SEE
-SEE'SHEET 1 S
C21 600' *'SA" 39.68. -I¢ 20.75 ¢t "'"���6RS4AP 'C $C23 40.00 20'26'08' 14.27' N_ Or 1- S
024 10.W' 27'26'4]" 8.4s' _� � 101.35' 2 I - J__
c5 40.00' 20.28'09' 14.27' ---7
�T I
I I NITS 27'31'E 180.11'�yl''1y'D' 3 ¢ \ /
W7 t9.W' 90.00'W 29.65' C1' X SEE DETAIL"CLOT C A$ p I `- C36 25.00' 81.30'06'n33.68' I 1119.27'31•E-1 .11• �. ' 3 -�/ I GW 25.W' 61'30'07' 35.56' ` "' � 36- 6' t05.9,' '{f,\�1 C41 19.00' 32'36'12" 10-82' �L�///fff\\\,,��{{{�'/ NI 5� n16.55'S3'y V7 IR \7LN33.10'45"N $l . .. E RAP ! < RAD
C42 25.00' 28'21'28' 12.37' 3 SAD pC�6 �.1`' 7 SEE NAIL'0'J
GS 19.W' 19'14'38• 6.36' �_ 45.05' 045 32.24 9 SEE SLEET 10 Is w C44 19.00' 18'34'46' 6.18' w Ei S: 11��`•--" i b. F
LOTS N CD �C LOT 8
2 23,224 SO.FT. 8 A Q n
.8 21.0E Tim' ¢
A d 1444'27'31'E _ 42'00'
i''' ' Ar I SE E DETAIL"E"
•00 7_, .-6.3' ]075' �.1_ Sl•1 /--[10.17'16�4-8?E 1m W.36�� 10].11' 041 J 14 O 1 f I N89'27'3,•E f 146.11' I t� /�1
SE • .a L142 i6.16 $ LOT A f DEMOROP p(NeYA1E) y .�� A Inr NE161 ACRES/t=' 1¢6.49.59•E' RAo
LiP! Q / NFv'27'31'e f1a6.61'_} � c. �
Cr"f -,1 $ S37.59
td1 k2
\ as
]0.15.__ SEE DETAIL"P'J'- -.I E.,,
w' 20'00' 40' ea' bar L SEE 54¢l 10 a CD GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=40' R LOT 1

3.OB . N70'06'16'N L9 1S V/
--RAT,PRC' �� a.00' /

16.653 SO.Ff. 1466'39'�s•w
a•S. 4g7'34.29'E Ji a ,'4 N7A P3C -
Na9'24'26"E ¢ R. PRC- G II:

1.23'�• `\ '11 163.38'20"E RAD tt 3481'-��}-34.66' 9 T�Ifi `N69'x4'26'E 167.30' '�/ 9.]9'
f 03'42'W RAO I. R!w 655'86'24"11 RAID 3.25•w1 SCUPLINE 9F LOT 22.COLLEGE 11 TH STREET 33 05' 1_No'02'09'E RAD w HEIGHTS BIT 17 PG 77-78 067.20'M - _ - _ NOS'24'26'E 660.05'4 T
- - --- - - 1298.34'N(1296.16'R1)
N1119'24'28'E 2620.66'L(N69.38'5T•E 2520.40'RI.R81
- (N69.30.57'E 2620.43'R31(059'38'43"E 2620.45'R4)

LETTEREDDLOTS:LOTS:11 TRACT MAP NO. 20366 SHEET 6 OF TO SHEETS

15.763 ACRES

IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8E1NC A SLEIDMSION OF LOTS 11, 22. 23 AND A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF COLLEGE I*3G1115 TRACT AS SHOWN, BY AS4P ON f7LE IN BOOK 17, PAGES 77 AND 78 OF ANDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN NOTES: BERlNiRDINO COUNTY
ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 2021

1. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES

BOOS CA BEARINGS,DATUM STATEMENT,

NOES MONUMENT NOTES AND SURVEY
RECORD INPORMATION NUKES.

2. SEE SHEET 4 FOR GPS,lea MAP AND u E-7
EASEMENT NOTES. SEE SHEET 7 15
3- SEE SHEET 6-10 FOR DETAILS. I 1 - 0' m R "'"4 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 AO'
6eb'S1'WE RAO F 27 o

40.1- 8' 5,7460.27.4.54 4400 00 96 I
c1 e R LOT '10
lee'27'31'EVVVVVV 8 7E "F.r 4 - NORTH LINE OF L01 23,COLLEGE 4,15.00• n i COLL>_aE HE10141E; PAR, 2 -/ TF1AOY M.6. 77/77-7B HEIGHTS DR 17 CO r7-79 `1RACI 20366 1 ` L �DOUN6ARY
1�1-]Mr'27.31•E \ 1_ 1e9'T4'o7'€ 330.w'
▪ /�'a 15.00' v SEE DETAIL•V' - - g._ Jii / ',E MEET 10 II
2709 ACRES 9.1e s.o7.62' I'�r'l_ t25'
s 1C 8 re9•zr3l^E L�ACRES 1 g" ;�
4� I>r `� 46.00' 300' E' IR _ 4738

6.07;-„rJ , tom°°"11.1�' �l��r'_^ xw PMB 44/66-57 -- GN o' N®'27'.31'E '--j 12 ,,,F+ 2] 1•E 67.20'ti 35.B7' g Y ` 82.1' 27 30E06.03-- y
f p LOT A 4.e1 ACRES *D DC()5(PRIVATE) h__ mar'L r I I we9'z7's1•E{z,6.3o; -ter
ul i06.,2' x 1- 360
510.50' IP 4�'�L
\ eii N- nl II I�- =�1 leo_ 3e.E Y Zar n S R� 2015,J' 20,r5' _RAO POC
_1Rar N44'27.31•E PAR. 3

9.73 sL9 ti
010 8 I
0LOT 8 a1 g I
2I00',_ADO I. 35AI)SO.FT. Q 4 - --
4202' g • -
N45'32.29'9 C)
E SE.E DETAIL"T' 1 IiL2- g^R°22_
SEE BEFr 10 , RM7 PCC•. - a n `� LOT 24 • '1 1�1'-Y- SEE DETAIL V `
61� ��!/� _1 8 8 _ a SEE SHEET ID of7LLEOE HEIGHTS 11 ` IN69'27'34'E 245.30'f 1 I Io4.00' ` ...1 b I ' YRACT M.P. 17/77-7B 1 ' B4 ACRES LOT A 0 8 UOOHIJT MARSH ..A I N
0 * (PRIVATE)
/7 1 L 08.2Y 46-7 246-36' i 1 - _ �' ,I_ ,y 104.46' � TII 105.74' HM 51 M.€ .y TINE TABLE i I_49'31'tY�� mil 1910.E.36_�-KG _ A F [� -LITE!A, DIRECT LQ4 LENGTH pRAD 5' 2025' R 1�444 27'31'F CD F..-
1 ��26F DETAIL 09• �� IOLA 9.73' .1 ,� Li N0'32'29^9 16.91• 26 A y AT MEET 10 il L2 NO'3x'29^e .00' id 2I �.d43 L3 N6B'27'31•E 26.00'
e LOT 7 ?�$ .-.1 _ aao'
N� L, N9'32'29.9 20.56'
() �Cy d S Tu 35,996 SO.IT. til Foe L9 N69.27.31'E 26.00' "! ..4 ,� _ O I 26- LID NO.32'29'9 41.15' Pv g SEE DETAIL'6' 1050' N46'32'29.9 02 r L11 NO'32'293 91.16' 5EE SHEET 10 �1s' ao.n' N63_.02'39.7+p im• ^+Ts •g s N19154 21'E R41 �T
/ /( -' 6 $ �O2vt'5�89 J
_MD L 101.32' z�_ 1 105.5`.� RAO zb0''1 ,p _ 3.00 / 4 L� 14f I / CLINE TARE
,- 1 Na9'x7'31^E 246.so•I I ! �`' ufi �+ !! 0- 4.661 ACRES LOT A 0 8 dMHE ARROY6(PRIVATE) ,--` 24a-- WIVE RADIX DELTA LEN9TH 1N69.27'31'E 203.30• i I I -Ts,- y2 !� 03 3.00' 63'29'341 2.60' _ _ _ j�7f�' 'i I C4 25.00• 90'00'00• 30.27' c� C4I t07.37' 8 S $ ' & 109.53' t6,•4i'63"��
RAp CS 25.03' 35'17'S5" 15.w'
i ,,,,L 5•• kl- 7-4,
ri� 'S7'3�"F�__ G I C8 3.00' 90.00100• ,.],' l PI* RAO POO

10.00' N44.2]'31•E Cl 5.00' 90'00'00' 7,55'
E ;20.73. 31,09' 3.00'
0,0 40.00' 22'16'42' 15.58•
i.L.l C,6 3.00' 53'29'63• 2.80.

W E,00 1 35,ese s6.Fr. 8 I8 cw 3.00' 69'23'53' 4,86' V) 3 n LOT 6 g$
020 25.00' 63.5046" 39.27.

21.00 22.00 g .1.11' I C21 38.00' a9'SB'46' 59.69' IO_ INS'32'29119.73' 223 40.00' 20'26'06' 14.27' a.n'
SEE DE/AIL'E' 2075' 20.5' H62'02'35'9 '� ie'32'29'9 C37 10.00' 90'00'00" 29.465' 5EE 54EET 8 WWyy4R 4� >>>
S S RAOIP �- 61R r �H89•27'306/�15.00' C36 25.00' al'30'06" 35.56' / NI .. H2�''_� 7�. N69'27'31'E
- 1ael°:1 105-25 RID c^x NO.32'29`K 7' 2.00' C39 10.00. 61'30'07•. 35.56' �_� IN5927'31•E 246.3o'I I I � / P ss.ao• 3n' N9.3x'2v'9 a1 t9.00• 32'3e'12• 1a.ez' �y A LOT A 0 OE910ROP(PRIVATE) N69.27.3T•E 25.00' kLR21z 2- N69.21.31•E 36 477' 1 1 2�50• 042 25.00' 26'2146•., 12.37' _- C45 25.00' 22'00'27'. 9.07'
d. � � 1]1.81' I �J '2T'31'E
A-26.00' 131.98' 8 8 8 .4.ar8. _ 3.1Y
6426'21'27'Al 2075' 2075'
_ -OM
IQ
L9I I2 LOT 5 x
32,9055 SO.H. B
129.90' 6W V
M6'39'65'K •
'o /' RAD PsC
1124
I
J 31.91'L�1 1 24.Bfi' 9 I439'24'26'E 377.04' . 11 - 69 79' ---1.. �R/9
_ NB9'24'28•E BB0.16• d�e STREET
32'29'r r r rH SOWN IIND a L01 23,COLLEGE

33.a0' LK6.02'a9'E RAoHEIGHTS BK 17 PG 77-76
EOI.AV- r FMg'x4'26'E 660.05'� - z - - _ _- - 1296.34'U(1296.16'RI)
Hag 24'26•E 2620.66.4(1469136'S1•E 2620.40'RI,R6)
- (539'36.57-E 2620.43'R3)(059'36'43'E 2620.46.R1) PROP 700f219

TTRE LOTS:S 14 TRACT MA p ADO n03L+L+ SHEET 7 OF 10 SHEETS LETTERED LOTS: 7 fir 1 Y L 6

15.763 ACRES NOTES:

IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1. SEE SHEET 3 FCR BOUNDARY MAP, BEING A S1.167MSON OF LOTS 11, 22. 23 ANO A PORTION OF LOT 72 OF CCILLECE NEA'1HTS TRACT AS SNOW. OASTS OF BEARINGS,DATUM STAIENENT, DY AMP ON f7LE IN BOOK 17, PAGES 77 AND 78 OF AMPS IN THE OFACE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN NOTES,NONINIENT NOTES ANC.sum.

BERN4RDINO COUNTY REo06a7 oiF1R14141I061 NOTES.

ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 20212, SEE SHEET 4 Fop<rs,INDE2 NAP ANs FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES EASUENT NOTES.

3. SEE SHEET 8-10 FOR DETAILS
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SF"
HBB'48'26'II 262a51'u(NB9.33'44•w_28w.37'R1,9b)1�'i99.37'S6-. 26w.49'R2.R37 1076.13'N _ .---�-- 19a4.37'N - - _e-
1 NORTH 11HE OF LOT 10.COLLEGE
2T1 `I 8 8 HEIGHTS BK 17 PC 77-78 8RI RI A NORTH LINE OF LOTS 11 A 12 FIR
. -- A- ... 4I 51 _z.`Ci311EGE HBCs115 B(17 r,.77 1P Is 54 �g;0I00 __ __
��I iI a R/B 'I
•!'6.9i�6 �. b4.46.26'4 406.04'
y-va.i9 1 408.15'
554'46.26'4 f I ,N'39'15'11 1I t 449027,1-5,E t 144.27,40.E Ne a7'/9'}=

6.47' 14.16' I�30.W"�I 1 i-30.1011 11-30,m II L5 0 3'' _I '' ® 300 _1 ' 4�' sm I I $ $I I $ $I i $ alVI -.1 •6ar0
$L.:2:: LOT 14 LOT 14 r n LOT 14 .I EW L r. 1 =' '1. 36,957 SQ.FI. I =' -I I '" -Ig O iti
12-W' 34A0'I AA 21.03' B TA -A $ S I4 71 IS gE DETAIL'H" 8 n sA `1 I q g &I i 4 IR 8 g 4 0 g R SEE SHEET 6- . .E.I 8 V 0 g l"�' N I.y.

Yp, x °7�g1 Q 1 _ SJ4 634' I ° f ri II I l�I N69'2 E1 i r 'O�/��j42-J - I t95.731 Ir 55.43' �1 AS.ag E1.5D'' 47,63' 1 59.74 LC Ne9•n'4s'EJ \ , H64'27'+5'E 1W.DD' 7 \ 444,27,45,E\09.00' f 1 / n / I.I50.76.SEE AIL'u $ NIIiOVI WV(PRIVATE) O --- /SEE CETML^I' \,C6 /1 SEE 9kET 9 LOT A 4.66T AORES SEE BEET 9
F31" / NB4'27'45"E 322.W' \
gf 34 E
ug 1 4. 49.E S 1419 ,T . 322.W' 1!B'2841156'' ,HAN • NI ddEE YY~ 4.

XIi-""5 ,._SEE
SEE%CETL9'J• S 52m - E'
14200' V V "§
g LOT 10 0 0 0 N
-- _ 2. 36,364 So.FT, SI
V1n ••�o 7-SSEE EE NEELL9 K" GEE DETAIL•L' 8 m I SEE SLEET 9 ',\ ti n m
y 13 T\,�,, y� $� Nm'27'4 f �N77'.32 05 R F-r nl ¢ -� ro'27 15,E 4.P3'-7 4. RA9 ACC 4 -L ¢ wr91 a.56 a2Bs6' 'Tryr- -. ...._.97.19'- _ �� S®L. n
Q `p .1Eg \ N49.27'45"E 322.90' I ya m 1gl.I s. EYEftAID GROTTO LOT A 4.681 ACRES B o li o ,i
Bs �I I�/ _`1 • E{ / (PRIVATE) NB9 27'45 E 3zz.W � `, ` r ut T '2 .• L ry69 p]'45•E 322.00' N69'284145G6' �B'1 • g v p L]

4. G
�''u�i �' •V EE7A1L•2' g c O ,� )- a SEES a .
a Eo E., LOT 9 P• if :-.0,,
L'7 O 36,364 SQ.FT. R F
al E" 0iC). 'I sa SEE SIEEETL9•N• SEE CETAD-"L' 92.00' 14.0V 4200' SEE SHEET 9�
`4 /`11' ' M N69.27.4 6 E,II 2_7'32B',\.NW 2745"E m er 4'� gi 322.05' airNAOq8
tr AT ` 1489'27'45"E 322.00' N64 27'45 E a •igi'l stE CErntL•4 g 0 CRESCENT AWGN LOT A B ND 3z'59'N '46'E (W _I�• SEE BEET 9 E g {PRIVATE) 4.681 ACRES N6.9.2293568,36B.W' 1 2.W' & 2 so') 4W.00' 13e oQ' -
I 259.86' 4W' 55
'-
rit. .:'27.45'E n T
y $
2 0 LOT 12 R
1204'. - I" fl 53,845 50.FT.

17.0C 2;.mr 4
4 OQ
N69'2]'45'E arll N38.51.24'E Alb
�6868 I I
{ / +,, N62'3B'32'E N69'27'4S"E 400.00'
V L. Hf11 PCC 298,E0' 11� 40.59' ` 66.93' f "0('-\/ '_N F1B9 1.07'E 260-07'HEAVENLY HOLLOW �� N�'27?31 �v '�' $' LOT A 4.6RS ACRES VAIET ao 15.00' %.- SEE DEISIL•A" `U 1
71 SEE SLEET 6�� , c7' \ N86.24.07"E T NB9'24'D7'E 135.W'� /1 1 -1NB9'27'31"E ,_ 330.0' / ,l f' 'm. 15 De r
LOT 21 TRACT 20366- - F3 f R R). .ry LOT I1 BWNDaRS �' LOT 3 I. R R§ t.zro ACRES -
CCLL8.GE H51c�HTs .

TRACT M.B. '17/77-7B 4 w 1.264 ACRES 4 I / 7 21 k 1
SEE SHEET 5 & 6
THE TABLE CURVE T. E CIAVE TABLE CURVE TABLE LINE KJ. DIRECTIONLENGTH CARVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH 15 -N25'45'12"E 5.22' CA 25.00' 20'00'00" 39.27' 021 39.00' 89'59.46' 59.69' C31 20.00' 90'00'00' 31.42' I,] Np9'27'31"E 4.50' C0 3.00' 60'00'00' 4.71' Ix2 20.00' 76'S9.49' 26.66' C32 20-00' 6'42'19" 3.04' LB 1 2A'32'29'N 4.W' C11 30.00' 26'17.29' 13.77' 725 22.00' 53'10'47• 29.04' 033 20.00' 69'25.47' 24.24' C12 3.00' 103'90'11' 5.39' C27 3.00' 98'46'73' 5.07' C39 25.00' 30'50'97' 13.40' 016 3.00' 103'09'10" 5.39' C20 3.03' 05'41'00' 5.01' C35 25.00' 32'23'45' 14.14' C19 3.00' 89'2]'5]' 4.88' C29 24.00' 75.59'W' 26-BB' C36 25.00' 26'17'27' 11.47' 020 25.00' 69'59'46" 39.27' C30 3.00' 103'00'19" 5.30' 040 20,00' 64.19.00' 29.43' 40' 20' 0' 40' 80' -
GRAPHIC SCALE: T"=40'

J.N.Al-23-I?

NUMBERED
UM EDtLOT:r 14 TRACT �ilA r+ 11►! f 20366 SHEET 8 OF 10 SHEETS lif 18.763 ACRES IYI/"'!1 I iV.

IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EAUNC A SUBOMSGON OF L075 11, 22. 23 AND A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF COLLEGE HW,ACHIS ma As SNOW BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 17, PAGES 77 AND 78 OF AMPS IN THE OFfICE OF THE CObWTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NOTES:

ADAMS—STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 2021 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 1. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP,

BASIS OF BEARINGS,DATUM

STATEMENT,NOTES,MONUMENT NOTES

AND SURVEY RECORD INFORMATION
NOTES

2. SEE SHEET 4 FOR CPS,NIDES MAP

ANO EASEMENT NOTES,
RW32'2946 Nee'27'31'E 24.93'

2.99' NO'32'24'm DEWDROP
LOT 3 `� 2.00' 118 i4

1.264 ACRES
N40-27'31'E Np'27'31"E
�L.1.71• L.1.71' 15.W' a0434 O Q -

16.09' V
A4roo o9'a0' a-e9 0'oho' LOT A ° 4 14°1 �+j 4 P' —
4' - - - - -
N6e'27'31'E aY,64'+
P po \i .
. 8 . \1
7 1.1
s r
n iVI
x LOT A g s�PB ° j LOT 1

4.661 ACRES ...1-.:7
4 / In
LOT 3 I Q
1,264 ACRES
I
M3 A3k -
�_ 1.480'27.31'E
L.7.26' 7.61'

6.16'41'26" DETA____,.AIL_"-E
L•4.71' NOT TO SGV.E
'�• 15'09' (FROM SHEET 5)
E`eD'00'eU' 550'27'31"E
L.1.71' Si DINE ARROYO/WILD WOWS

15.00' 3.90' w•M ,,tt�/ A. 4'
MO.27'31'E CW0"00'00" 2 p
LOT 3 N3'32'29'w N!9.27'31"L14' �' 4 3 0

1.264 ACRES 3.0o' .w.e`yj1'r �� P,gs
N69.27'31"E 110.11' 45,, '41,2,• ^ LOT A I� zayl°E—' m° TROD WOODS b y6 i
00 ..00 0
DETAIL "A" it,
(FROM NOT TO SClIF
(FROM SHEET 5)
y 8
- ~
° LOT 2/LOT 4 r
\ MOONLIT MARSH // .
0' 00. LOT A yI
(' r 0 �. 23'',1'
p�a ,�� 0 DETAIL "C" M9'77'31'E
E"4 75.11,- NOT TC SCAN
G f89'z7'31"E
FROM WELT 5)
�v's+4r N
'�44'_ .7,17'= \ LOT 6
LOT 3 N6 7'3 9'2I'E \ ° 11139.27'31'E
l '.--4�1
DETAIL "0' # i I'l V�
NOT TO SCALE 1�1�,, { -2I� ID'? 26!'
(FROM SHEEP 5) ZI g '' •I'
•PE4 Q%G,• J0 1 ...vI
�'�T d�1Vo
N99'
27'31E „LOT '8 :�� LOT A O

DEWDROP
�4mI.� ;1,�'a.1 r DETAIL "c„
HO7 TO COM F
.1 .�¢I Si N y 00 (FROM STOET 5 k s)
P.
1,66.27'31"E
—115.25' +4 ` ` 7
pyiAY L '' r MOONLIT MARSH
LOT A — , �O a u o
LOT A
0 vs
DEW➢ROP 4
8 9'2'31 ©l' air k
DETAILNOT TO 1 S I.IPLRIN �WA'
<,
(FROM SHIFT 6) LOT 7 ! i.I "IM ,,,
464•27'31"E
DETAIL "G"

NOT TO SCALE
(/ROM SHEET 6)

J.N.33-2311

LET E LOTS:: 14 SHEET'MAP NO. 20366 SHEET 9 OF 10 SHEETS LETTERED RED L07S: r

15.7BJ ACRES

IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 11. 22. 23 AND A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF COLLEGE WORTS 7R4CT AS SNOW, 8Y 14412 ON ALE IN BOOM! 17 PAGES 77 AND 78 OF MAPS, IN NE-OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERN4ROINO COUNTY
ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 2021

FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
NOTES:

I. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP.

BASIS OF BEARINGS,CAM

STATEMENT,NOTES,MONUMENT

NOTES AND SURVEY RECORD
LOT 14 INFORMATION NOTES.

2. SEE SHEET 4 FOR OPS,HIDES LAP
1449'27'31•E ANC EASEMENT NOTES.
6182.27.31.E
rr `' 6 Npp 0.07''E
�RI MI PIg B 0 RI
PI 1 1 LOT 14 F1. }

41.3 3.00'L 12.19' 6.34' 13.25.- i1g �8 w. 149'77'45'E 10C.09' -�
00 LOT A ALLOW WISP 4 -

27.74' 2.70' 19.07' 'R 19.17'

32.00'
NB9'2)'45"E 55.74'
DETAIL "li" , 1- I•
¢A0MTSHEEi SCALE) sz2l.7o' d �' I ` I.LOT 13 Nal 4' 'E
L-0.24'
L.4.71' /•6`4'3B'22- .IT'
R^3.00'EMERALD GROTTO/MALLOW tMSP NB9.9.8]'
.83' 15.00'
322.00'- LOT A 00 g r.

WILLOW IMSP p
LOT A Na•32'1s w l 4
� S'
60 e 32s-ro' Neyz��s-e DETAIL "I"
e. c�- NOT TO SOW
P. pp (FROM SHEET 7)
CD
E f'
Al yl 26 w
1� 184.27'31'E

5.74 LOT 9/LOT 10 9"I g
(4 ,'
'X 0 NAB'2]'31'E I
1n7 3a'oB w • 42.7C �1 I. e.aa' /w140.12.15"11a z%45 E R,��4' .r r s2'x'46• 11£ RIB 9.84' S.

F!9'27'31"E y
* 7.15� 1r 0
N42'4A'07'f NB9•p7'45•E L-3.BB' P
Ni0 r gI r10.3z•02• g
6v0'21'22' ^ �. -NdB'27'31'E, FE1g
'I7, 15.23• C a
1Y
3-
DETAIL "J" LOT 9/LOT 10 sli

NOT TO SCALE
{ (FROM SHEET 7) .15'F, iI St,
00 "8
L-2.34' . yo'
0"04 44 31" Rg,' 4S•E 2 N82'27_45'E 527.22' r3'p73n15•" pApti4 LIT A _4`' 6.96' r4lp'27'45'E 322.00'
�L-3.05• RI a CRESCENT MOON/EMERALD GROTTO
;»I LOT 9/LOT 10•,' I DETAIL "L"
y�
'T `"6'. 0 LOT 9 011Y
Th LOT 10 rET FEFr 7 NOT TC SCALE
NOT
SHEET 7)
k, w 1819'2731•F'5.a8 / NO 32 Y2•w\
g 2.27'
p13NOB 58 22"E \
3 •.�•. NB9'27.3t'E �ii2uo' CRESCENT MOON �:, { �' p7'2B'3]" r 6182.27.45.E °�'a f '1 Nea z7 ,E LOT A 00 0J� 96_ LOT A 00f ,GAS 4;5j,�f ^0'323 ✓ N69'27'45'E +--wse 0 `
te
818'15'31•E
4iM•47• 6162.27.45.E Ib
-...' 322 W'
CRESCENT MOON/OAERALD OTTO\ / ;8�'
DETAIL "K" ' _ / "

4. NOT TO SCALE(FROM SHEET 7) 2 PMt'521'w 4�.,,.v'3rE 'E 5.50
111
xMx
N89.27'31•E rn 01.1
\ti fr 40 ;N' :1
:1 LOT 14 4
c v 1 ^N•51'I5.w 83 LOT 12
RHFi-PCC 634'54 17'
.27
W '{'y' g 1 NB0122B'E 74
65 .rly 1 P RAD ^72 W45'ES'
Z 2 4 II L•3.04' .
'4D°b �L' A"B'42.IA' L-3.1B
I420'01'S7'E R� 50.26' A-6O'44'43• 8
22 - ROD ,A•10'0f'E by 1499'27'45'E- •�
60 LOT A RAC 00 DETAIL "N"
DETAIL "NI" (FROM
WISP NOT To Sal
(FROM SHEET 7)

NOT TO SCALE
CARVE TABLE (FRAM SHEET 7)
CURVE RADIUS DELTA LE»0IN
C12 3.00' 103'00'11' 5.34'
020 3.00' 95'41'00' 5.01'
C30 3.09' 103'00'I0' 5.39

}

NUMBERED `°� 14 TRACT MAP NO. 20366 SHEET 10 OF 10 SHEETS

LETTERED
Lws: r

15.763 ACRES

IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EN NIC A SVBOMSSKIN OF LOTS II, 2L 23 AN0 A PORTION OF LOT r2 OF COLLEGE HEIGHTS TRACT AS SHOWN, BY MAP ON ALE IN BOOK 17, PAGES 77 AND 78 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY REWRITER OF SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADAMS-STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. RANDAL L. STREETER, R.C.E. 25083 MAY, 2021

FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
NOTES:

1. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP,
BASIS OF REARMNS.0A111M
STATEMENT.NOTES,MONUMENT
NO1ES ANS SURVEY RECORD
R*'ORATAIICN NOTES
2 SEE SHEET 4 FOR CPS,INDEX MAP
AND EASEMENT NOTES.
_ DEAORO' LOT A DIVINE ARROYO/MOCNLIT MARSH/MDMOOS .-":1717. c. 00 ` av9�.7 CND LOT A >

47. NIE'27'31'E ( H. _ �- YD931'C a ay s, '1�, t },4S w
6I p I.RA_y� a� AI �
hI 1 4 f 4,4. E J:
§1 \a LOT 2,3&4
gr
LOT 1 xIM RI ,1%4. - �.P nI:

C.
1 nI b.C. '2 T2. .1,
QI \ VC1

3.�
N98'27'3I'EI
PETAIL "P" L3.00j
NOT TO SCALE 1199.27'51"E
(FROM SHEEP 5) TADE IL "0"
• T TC SEMI
(FROM SHEET 5)

MILD MOODS
Q IV °W
OO .U$5'r 1.4 CI
d� LOT 7
LOT A '�°1
IF35 27'31'E_ N39'27121'E
Re,'.. ?.I 1 \\ a.oa' y .•52'ze'w \ LOT $ / IRS "ZI2 �-'' •�97 or NBB'z7'31'E r. �'Qf 4a7.1. O,.36' AK 11.. ` '3 .

Ri 4. 1.
#• , A 4 �..,.45„ �,I ddd •FI Ip,
39'S0' , ,1, Q 6 Fl
R. n1E'Sa•z1 Y 1�. 0 4
. -'2 Q OU P Iur°Rc �m zT„E LOT 4 f� S' F a �I4� ::°'
,o4.e9'—gLOTAbI .� c.23�'vet F

LOT ADIARROYOMOON)JTMAR

4.23 DETAIL '•T"
989=27.3rE DE TAIL "5" NOT TO SCALE
DETAIL R" )RpISHEE 6) (FROM SHEET 5&5)

NOT TO SCALE
(FROM SHEET 5)
LOT 8 <
LOT 11 MOONLIT MARSH
a LOT A
NBB'2]'317E p
N0. .p.w II,�4.23 = 1421'49'34'E .010%,0, L'7.E1A'�

1.87' NO'37'22•N / +'l E, I RID ArYg�., D o

3.5a' �S
104.09' ai Rk/ 'n �' i 0
ne9'z7's,•E �µ Ni19'27'31'6 .. i731E
:E �4 v� R$ 101./9
s°A9T Ori 'n'31'e{
NA<YI SS- O ' ' N39'27'31'E 1.n' 2 wm LOT A SS 2.00'
MOONLIT MARSH LOT A O I I 114 LOT 7
DETAIL "i" IIIETAIL "V"
NOT TO SCALE Nor TO SON
DETAIL "T"
(FROM SHEET 5&6) (FROM SHEE7 6) I NOT 7O SCALE (FROM SHEET 5&4)

LA,20-2317

4,a trpl CITY
UPLAND
„.;
"The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krcifil
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

STACEY PADRON,EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF THE HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM(HMGP)FY 2023-24

GRANT AWARD
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council accept the CalEOS Hazard Mitigation Grant Program award of$85,427.91 and appropriate the funding to Fund 217.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of pursuing grant funding to supplement local funding sources and exercise prudent fiscal management of the City's funds.

BACKGROUND
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Hazard Mitigation Branch administers the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) to fund plans and projects that provide an opportunity for communities to implement mitigation activities to reduce risk to life and property from natural hazards. In California, natural hazards include wildfire,earthquake,drought,extreme weather,flooding,and other impacts of climate change.

In November 2021,HMPG released a notice of funding opportunity as a result of the Presidential Disaster Declaration.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
On March 31, 2022,the City applied for$112,500 in federal funding from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program to support the City's efforts to update its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. On November 21,2023,the City was awarded with$85,427.91 for the FY 23-24 grant cycle.The City is required to provide$8,997.67 towards the plan to cover the total project cost of$94,425.58.

Grant funding will be used to meet the most current Federal Emergency Management Agency hazard mitigation plan guidance requirements in the development of the City's Hazard Mitigation Plan.An effective Hazard Mitigation plan is key to breaking the cycle of disaster damage and reconstruction. The implementation of these effective strategies will give the City the opportunity to reduce the need for costly recovery efforts after disasters occur.Maintaining an up-to-date Hazard Mitigation Plan facilitates smoother funding applications by showcasing proactive risk management strategies,increasing the likelihood of securing future financial support.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA.The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The CalEOS Hazard Mitigation Grant Award funds will be budgeted and appropriated in Fund 217 (Other Grants) under Project 42031.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project

U.S.Department of Homeland Security
FEMA Region 9
1111 Broadway,Suite 1200
osQA�`4 Oakland,CA 94607
FEMA
•4qND Stiff
November 21, 2023
Nancy Ward, Director
Governor's Authorized Representative
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
3650 Schriever Avenue
Mather, CA 95655
Reference: Application Approval, HMGP DR-4482-925-72P
City of Upland
City of Upland Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
FIPS Code: 071-81344, Supplement 29
Dear Nancy Ward:

We approve and issue Hazard Mitigation Grant Program(HMGP) funds for the City of Upland, HMGP DR-4482-925-72P, City of Upland Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update.

The total project cost is $89,976.74. As shown in the enclosed Obligation Report - Supplement 29, we are obligating $80,979.07 for the 90 percent Federal share; the 10 percent non-Federal share is $8,997.67. We are obligating $4,448.84 for the 100% Federal share Subrecipient Management Costs.

These funds are available in SmartLink for immediate and eligible disbursements. The following is a summary of the approved funding:

Funding Type: Federal Non-Federal Share: Total Project Cost:

Share:

Supplement 29 $80,979.07 $8,997.67 $89,976.74 Management Costs $4,448.84 $0.00 $4,448.84 This HMGP project approval and obligation of funds are subject to the following conditions:

1. Scope of Work(SOW)—The City of Upland will develop and adopt a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to meet the requirements outlined in 44 CFR Part 201 and the most current FEMA hazard mitigation plan guidance.

2. Project Completion Date—The work schedule included with the project application indicates that the project will take 36 months to complete; therefore, the activity completion date is November 21, 2026. Please inform the sub-recipient that work completed after this date is not eligible for federal funding, and that federal funds may be de-obligated for work completed outside the completion date when there is no approved time extension. www.fema.gov

Nancy Ward
November 21, 2023

3. Project Closeout—Within 120 days of project completion, all project funds must be liquidated and final closeout documentation for the project must be submitted to FEMA.

Please note the project must comply with Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200 reporting requirements at the time of closeout.

4. Record of Environmental Consideration (REC)—In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA), this undertaking is categorically excluded(CE) from the need to prepare either an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

5. Standard Conditions—This project approval is subject to the enclosed Standard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Conditions, amended August 2018. Please note that federal funds may be de-obligated for work that does not comply with these conditions.

If you have any questions,please contact Jared Peri, Grants Management Specialist, by email [email protected] , or phone (202) 374-4957.

Sincerely,
KATHRYN J Digitally signed by KATHRYN J

LIPIECKI
LIPIECKI Date:2023.11.21 19:40:11 -08'00'
Kathryn Lipiecki
Director, Mitigation Division
FEMA Region 9
Enclosures (2):

Obligation Report- Supplement 29
Standard Mitigation Grant (HMGP) Conditions
cc: Ron Miller, Acting State Hazard Mitigation Officer, California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
Robyn Fennig, Acting State Hazard Mitigation Officer, California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
Joseph Purvis, Division Chief, California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Robert McCord, Chief, Hazard Mitigation Assistance Branch, FEMA Region 9

10/30/2023 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY HMGP-OB-02 11:44 HAZARD MITIGATION GRANTS PROGRAM
Obligation Report w/Signatures
Disaster FEMA Amendment State Action Supplemental No Project No No Application ID No No State Recipient 4482 72 •P 0 925 1 29 CA Statewide Subrecipient: Upland Project Title: 7%City of Upland Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Subrecipient FIPS Code:071-81344
Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Available Previously Allocated Previously Obligated Pending Obligation for New Obligation $80,979.07 $80,979.07 $0.00 $0.00
Subrecipient Management
Project Amount Cost Amount Total Obligation IFMIS Date IFMIS Status FY $80,979.07 $4,448.84 $85,427.91 10/30/2023 Accept 2024 Comments
Date: 10/30/2023 User Id: RHIRST
Comment: Approve funding of$80,979.07 and SRMC$4,448.84 totaling$85,427.91 for DR-4482-925-072P San Bernardino-7%City of Uplanc Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Authorization
Preparer Name: REILLY HIRST Preparation Date: 10/30/2023 HMO Authorization Name: JARED PERI HMO Authorization Date: 10/30/2023 Authorizing Official Signature Authorizing Official Title Authorization Date Authorizing Official Signature Authorizing Official Title Authorization Date

Standard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Conditions
FEMA Region IX,August,2018
The following list applies to Recipients and Subrecipients accepting HMGP funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security(DHS):

1. Applicable Federal, State,and Local Laws and Regulations. The Recipient/Subrecipient must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Local laws and regulations,regardless of whether they are on this list or other project documents. DHS financial assistance Recipients and Subrecipients are required to follow the provisions of the State HMGP Administrative Plan,applicable Hazard Mitigation Assistance Uniform Guidance,and Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards located in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations(CFR)Part 200, adopted by DHS in 2 CFR 302.

2. Financial Management Systems. The Recipient and Subrecipient must maintain financial management systems to account for and track funds,as referenced in 2 CFR 200.302.

3. Match or Cost Share. Non-federal match or cost share must comply with 2 CFR 200.306,the scope of work(SOW), and any agreements among the Subrecipient,the Recipient,and FEMA.

4. Budget Changes. Unanticipated adjustments are permitted within the approved total cost. However, if costs exceed the federal share,the Subrecipient must notify the Governor's Authorized Representative(GAR) of overruns before implementation. The GAR shall submit a written request for approval to FEMA Region IX. The subaward must continue to meet HMGP requirements, including cost effectiveness and cost share. Refer to 2 CFR 200.308 for additional information.

5. Real Property and Land. The acquisition,use,and disposition must comply with 2 CFR 200.311.

6. Equipment. The acquisition,use,and disposition must comply with 2 CFR 200.313.

7. Supplies.Upon project completion,FEMA must be compensated for unused supplies, exceeding $5,000(fair market value),and not needed for other federal programs. Refer to 2 CFR 200.314.

8. Procurement. Procurement procedures must be in conformance with 2 CFR 200.318-320.

9. Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance.The Recipient and Subrecipient must submit quarterly progress reports, as referenced in the 2 CFR 200.328 and State HMGP Administrative Plan.

10. Records Retention. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.333, financial/programmatic records related to expenditures must be maintained at least 3 years after the date of Recipient's final expenditure report.

11. Enforcement and Termination. If the Recipient or Subrecipient fails to comply with the award or subaward terms,whether stated in a Federal statute or regulation,the State HMGP Administrative Plan, subpplication,a notice of award, an assurance, or elsewhere,FEMA may take one or more of the actions outlined in 2 CFR 200.338,including termination or partial termination of the award or subaward outlined in 2 CFR 200.339.

12. Allowable Costs. Funds are to be used for allowable costs in compliance with 2 CFR 200.403,the approved SOW,and any agreements among the Subrecipient,Recipient,and FEMA. 1

13. Non-Federal Audit. The Recipient and Subrecipient are responsible for obtaining audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984,in compliance with 2 CFR 200.501.

14. Debarred and Suspended Parties. Recipients and Subrecipients are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689,and 2 CFR 180. These regulations restrict federal financial assistance awards, subawards,and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in the federal assistance programs or activities.

15. Equipment Rates. Rates claimed for use of Subrecipient-owned equipment in excess of the FEMA- approved rates must be approved under State guidelines issued by the State Comptroller's Office or must be certified by the Recipient to include only those costs attributable to equipment usage less any fixed overhead and/or profit.

16. Duplication of Funding between Public Assistance(PA) and HMGP. Funding for PA Section 406 and HMGP Section 404 are permitted on the same facility/location,but the activities identified under each program must be distinct with separately accounted funds. At closeout,FEMA may adjust the funding to ensure the Subrecipient was reimbursed for eligible work from only one funding source.

17. Historic Properties and Cultural Resources. In compliance with 2 CFR 800,if a potential historic property or cultural resource is discovered during construction,the Subrecipient must cease work in the area and take all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize harm to the discovered property/resource. During construction,the Subrecipient will monitor ground disturbance activity, and if any potential archeological resources are discovered,will immediately cease work in that area, and notify the Recipient and FEMA. Construction in the area may resume with FEMA's written approval after FEMA's consultation,if applicable,with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO).

18. NEPA and Changes to the Scope of Work(SOW). To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA),and other Laws and Executive Orders, any change to the approved SOW shall be re-evaluated before implementation. Construction associated with a SOW change,prior to FEMA approval,may be ineligible for funding. Acceptance of federal funding requires environmental permits and clearances in compliance with all appropriate federal, state and local laws, and failure to comply may jeopardize funding.

Within their authority,the Recipient and Subrecipient must use of all practicable means, consistent with other essential policies,to create and maintain productive harmony for people and nature, and fulfill the social, economic,and other needs of present and future generations of Americans. 2

�� �pl"� CITY
UPLAND
"The City of Gracious Living"
Staff`kr
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

JESSICA GANDARA,RECREATION&COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER AN AWARD OF BID FOR PROJECT NO. 83003,OLIVEDALE PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a construction contract for the replacement of the playground at Olivedale Park in the amount of$115,300 and approve a construction contingency in the amount of$23,060, for a total amount of$138,360.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of maintaining first rate parks and recreational facilities,thus enhancing the desirability of the City of Upland as a place to live and strengthen the community image.

BACKGROUND
In December 2022, staff included the playground replacement at Olivedale Park on the Quimby Fee Project Identification report, and at the January 8, 2024 meeting of the City Council, the procurement of the playground equipment was approved for a total of$180,317.72.

The Olivedale Park Playground Equipment Installation Notice Inviting Bids (NIB) was advertised on January 29, 2024 and February 5, 2024 in accordance with the California Public Contract Code(Section 20164) and it was also listed on the City's website. On February 27,2024,the City opened four bids for the project.An administrative error led to the City Council rejecting all bids at the March 25,2024 meeting.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The Olivedale Park Playground Equipment Installation Notice Inviting Bids(NIB)was advertised on April 11, 2024, and April 18,2024 in accordance with the California Public Contract Code(Section 20164).It was also posted on the City's website and sent to the previous NIB's prospective bidders.On April 25,2024,staff opened three bid packages for the Project,as follows:

BIDDER BID AMOUNT
Ortco,Inc. $115,300
DD Systems Inc. $136,847
R.E. Schultz Construction,Inc. $139,650
The lowest responsible bidder was Ortco, Inc. with a base bid of$115,300. The City has reviewed all three bid packages and confirmed that Ortco,Inc. is the lowest responsible and responsive bidder.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15302 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the proposed project includes the removal of existing playground equipment/structures and replacement with new playground equipment/structures of substantially the same size, purpose,and capacity.

FISCAL IMPACTS
With this action, City Council will authorize the appropriation of$138,360 of funds for the playground replacement at Olivedale Park. Funds for the installation are already been budgeted in the Park Acquisition and Development Capital Project Fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Reject all bids and authorize the City Clerk to re-advertise the Project.Due to a successful bidding process, staff does not recommend this alternative.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to Section 15302 of the CEQA Guidelines.

, trpl" CITY FUPLAND
5, i6 "The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krcifil
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

STACEY PADRON,EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION

BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM EQUIPMENT REBATE VOUCHER AWARD
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council accept that U.S. Department of Energy Program Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Equipment Rebate Voucher award for $134,030 and appropriate the funding to Fund 425.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of pursuing grant funding to supplement local funding sources and exercise prudent fiscal management of the City's General Capital Projects Fund.

BACKGROUND
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)was signed into law by President Biden on November 15, 2021.

The law authorizes $1.2 trillion for transportation and infrastructure spending. Section 40552 of the IIJA provides $550 million for an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant(EECBG)Program through the U.S.Department of Energy(DOE). The DOE provides $440 million in formula and competitive EECBG funding to eligible units of local government,states,and Indian tribes to assist in implementing strategies to reduce total energy use and improve energy efficiency. The City of Upland's IIJA formula funding was calculated as$134,030.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
In May of 2023,the City submitted a preapplication for the U.S. Department of Energy Program Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Voucher to support the City's efforts to design and install up to 8 vehicle charging stations at the Police Department and/or Public Works yard. In December 2023, in an effort to reduce the quantity of paperwork associated with the funding,the City requested to switch from a grant to an Equipment Rebate Voucher. On April 4,2024,the EECBG Program Voucher Application was completed,and on May 3,2024,the U.S.

Department of Energy approved the City's voucher application and provided notice that the City may now proceed with the purchase and installation of equipment.

Staff will now proceed with engaging a vendor to assist with the design and construction of charging facilities at the Police Department and/or Public Works yard.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is acceptance and budgeting of a grant and is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project"and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Voucher funds will be budgeted and appropriated in Fund 425(General Capital Projects)under Project 85004.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project

From: EECBG Vouchers
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 12:05 PM
To: Steve Nix
Cc: Brett Lance ; Londa Helms ; EECBG Vouchers

Subject: [EXTERNAL] U.S. Department of Energy EECBG Program Voucher Application Preapproval - Upland
WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Dear Steve,
Congratulations! U.S. Department of Energy has approved your Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program Equipment Rebate Voucher application.This email serves as your official notice that you can now proceed with equipment purchase and installation.

Attached is a copy of the Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist (FARC) with information about required reporting documents and how to upload them.

If you need additional assistance or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] and reference your application number below.

Application Number: IA-0000000554
Thank you,
EECBG Program Voucher Team
U.S. Department of Energy EECBG Program Vouchers I [email protected] doerebates.my.site.com/eecbgvouchers

1T )
roi0Era STATE&COMMUNITY ENERGY PROGRAMS

FINAL ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP)
U.S. Department of Energy(DOE)
ATTACHMENT 1A: DOE FORMULA GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

FOR THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT(EECBG) PROGRAM This document presents the final formula grant funding allocations by Local Government(Table la)for the EECBG Program -Sec. 40552(b) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) of 2021.

Table la. FINAL EECBG Program Formula Grant Funding Allocations to Local Governments Listed Alphabetically by State and Local Government
# State/Territory Entity Name Level of Allocation Government
Total (Local Governments) $299,200,000
1 AK Aleutians East County $75,120
2 AK Fairbanks North Star County $77,080
3 AK Haines County $75,080
4 AK Kenai Peninsula County $76,770
5 AK Ketchikan Gateway County $75,180
6 AK Kodiak Island County $75,250
7 AK Matanuska-Susitna County $77,960
8 AK North Slope County $75,430
9 AK Northwest Arctic County $75,270 10 AK Petersburg County $75,120
11 AK Anchorage City $300,250
12 AK Bethel City $75,220
13 AK Fairbanks City $76,260
14 AK Juneau, City and Borough of City $76,130 15 AK Kenai City $75,270
16 AK Ketchikan City $75,300
17 AK Kodiak City $75,210
18 AK Palmer City $75,250
19 AK Sitka City $75,300
20 AK Wasilla City $75,390
21 AL Baldwin County $246,150
22 AL Calhoun County $79,030
23 AL Etowah County $78,540
24 AL Jefferson County $348,100
25 AL Lee County $78,040
1

( T)r-k% scE p
1 - STATE&COMMUNITY ENERGY PROGRAMS
# State/Territory Entity Name Level of Allocation Government
292 CA San Gabriel City $76,330
293 CA San Jacinto City $112,830
294 CA San Jose City $834,110
295 CA San Juan Capistrano City $76,220 296 CA San Leandro City $143,300
297 CA San Luis Obispo City $76,790
298 CA San Marcos City $146,690
299 CA San Mateo City $155,720
300 CA San Rafael City $123,900
301 CA San Ramon City $140,000
302 CA Santa Ana City $315,020
303 CA Santa Barbara City $146,330
304 CA Santa Clara City $183,290
305 CA Santa Clarita City $240,550 306 CA Santa Cruz City $125,770
307 CA Santa Maria City $158,930
308 CA Santa Monica City $157,730
309 CA Santa Rosa City $210,570
310 CA Santee City $118,300
311 CA Simi Valley City $166,670
312 CA South Gate City $142,040
313 CA South San Francisco City $129,470 314 CA Stanton City $76,230
315 CA Stockton City $316,310
316 CA Sunnyvale City $199,020
317 CA Temecula City $161,250
318 CA Temple City City $76,170
319 CA Thousand Oaks City $174,360
320 CA Torrance City $194,870
321 CA Tracy City $144,040
322 CA Tulare City $125,790
323 CA Turlock City $130,380
324 CA Tustin City $136,890
325 CA Union City City $128,020
326 CA Upland City $134,030
327 CA Vacaville City $151,450
328 CA Vallejo City $164,850
329 CA Victorville City $173,590
9

4��a �p19� CITY UPLAND
�5, _�� "The City of Gracious Living"
C,,tIFOB,S
'• Stafif(krctill
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN

EMPLOYMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing participation in Employment Risk Management Authority.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of sound fiscal stewardship for the City of Upland.

BACKGROUND
On June 23,2014,the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6232 declaring membership in the Municipal Insurance Cooperative Joint Powers Authority (MIC) for collective buying power for insurance quotes. Since that time, additional governments,both municipalities and special districts have also joined MIC.

On November 27, 2023,the City Council approved a professional services agreement with Keenan&Associates to serve as the City's third-party administrator for the workers' compensation program.

On March 25,2024,the City Council approved a Resolution withdrawing from the Municipal Insurance Cooperative.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
In the last four years,the City has had significant increases in its general liability and workers'compensation insurance premiums. For over a year Administrative Services staff have explored other insurance arrangements that may better suit the City's structure and needs.

One of the three joint powers authorities that the City applied to this fiscal year is California Intergovernmental Risk Authority Joint Powers Authority(CIRA). CIRA has over 50 municipal and special district members,including the Cities of Arcadia, Highland, Menifee, Placentia, Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Santa Margarita, Sierra Madre, Twentynine Palms, Wildomar, Yucaipa and Yucca Valley and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. CIRA provides increased pricing power with a larger membership, but also provides tools that the City can leverage to implement cost-effective loss prevention programs. As opposed to the City's current joint powers authority,CIRA is also a risk sharing pool,meaning losses are shared between all members.

CIRA uses Employment Risk Management Authority Joint Powers Authority(ERMA)for its excess risk layer as well as for claims management and risk prevention training services. ERMA services are included with a CIRA membership, but members are not required to join ERMA. In order to utilize ERMA claims management and risk prevention training services included with a CIRA membership, staff are proposing that City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing participation in ERMA.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action authorizes participation in joint powers authority and is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project"and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The City's current workers' compensation claims management services agreement calls for a $105,753 fee for FY 24/25. By moving these services to ERMA which are included with CIRA membership,the City will save that amount next fiscal year in the Self-Funded Liability Internal Service Fund.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE

EMPLOYMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the City of Upland wishes to obtain Employment Practices Liability coverage beginning July 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA) is a self- insured joint powers authority created for the sole purpose of Employment Practices Liability Coverage. ERMA is comprised of various public entities who risk share up to $1 million against potentially unlawful employment practices and discrimination claims; and
WHEREAS, ERMA formed primarily due to the fact that government entities have not historically been able to secure Employment Practices Liability (EPL) coverage at a competitive cost through the commercial insurance marketplace; and WHEREAS, ERMA has met all of the high professional standards established by the California Association of Joint Powers Authorities (CAJPA) in the areas of governance, finance, claims control, safety and loss control and ERMA is fully accredited by CAJPA. CAJPA's accreditation process requires reviews by independent consultants in the areas of accounting, claims adjusting, and actuarial analysis; and WHEREAS, ERMA provides services to both Joint Powers Insurance Authorities and individual public entities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland has determined that it is in the best interest to become a member of ERMA for the purpose of obtaining Employment Practices Liability coverage; and
WHEREAS, ERMA requires the City of Upland to pass a resolution expressing the desire and commitment of the City of Upland's participation in ERMA, which requires a three year minimum participation period. City of Upland also understands our entity will be bound by the provisions in the ERMA Joint Powers Agreement just as though it were fully set forth and incorporated herein whether our entity had signed it individually or through an underlying Joint Powers Insurance Authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Upland hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:

Section 1. The City of Upland approves participation in ERMA effective July 1, 2024.

Section 2. The City Manager on behalf of the City of Upland is hereby authorized to take any and all actions necessary to implement the foregoing resolution.

Resolution No.

Section 3. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds that this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Further, if the activity is deemed a project this City Council finds that this Resolution is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 2024.

Bill Velto, Mayor
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 13th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

�� �pl"� CITY
UPLAND
"The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krctill
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER SUPPORT OF A 15-YEAR FRESH START WITH CALPERS RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council support staffs inclusion of a 15-year Fresh Start with CalPERS in conjunction with the upcoming 2-year budget.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of providing fiscal stewardship for the City of Upland.

BACKGROUND
The City Council has taken many positive steps toward reducing its current and future pension costs, including,but not limited to:
• 2016-Established separate 115 Trusts for Pension and Retiree Medical(OPEB)Liabilities. • 2016 — Required, via the bargaining processes, Safety employees to pay 3.0% toward the City's Normal Costs (in addition to the required Employee Shared Matching Contribution of 9.0%). In addition, commencing in 2020, required new Miscellaneous Plan employees to pay 1.4% toward the City's Normal Costs.
• 2017-Transferred responsibility for providing Fire Service operations to San Bernardino County. • 2020 — Engaged Govinvest to provide a pension module calculator and Urban Futures Inc., (UFI) via a competitive RFP process to provide informational services to the Finance Committee and public regarding the City's UAL.
• 2020/2021 —Held 7 public meetings exploring the City's UAL. • 2021—Approved a Pension Funding Policy to establish three approaches by which money would be set aside to fund the City's Section 115 Pension Trust, and one approach to save interest expense by paying down future CalPERS obligations at a faster pace than required. • 2021 —Held multiple public meetings discussing the BLAST UAL Strategy.

On December 13,2021,the City Council approved BLAST—a multi-pronged strategy—to pay down the City's UAL.

The BLAST Strategy used:
• Bonds to finance budgeted Water Capital Improvement Projects,thus creating financial capacity,freeing up those budgeted funds to be invested in the General Fund. • Lease investment of the General Fund that the Water Fund (with reserves available due to bonding) and Sewer Fund (available unrestricted reserves) would acquire. The General Fund's Lease Revenue Bond proceeds would be used to make an additional discretionary payment(ADP)to CalPERS. • Additional discretionary payments from the City's Section 115 Pension Trust and from Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste unobligated reserves made strategically on amortization bases to level future UAL payments. • Savings directed to the City's Section 115 Pension Trust to be available to pay down future CalPERS bases or make additional ADPs.
• Transfers of Water, Sewer and Solid Waste Funds' share of the City's UAL to CalPERS from reserves to eliminate their liability.

To effectuate this strategy,between December 2021 and April 2022,the City Council:
• Authorized the transfer of $10 million from the City's Section 115 Pension Trust to make an ADP to CalPERS.

• Authorized a$15.26 million ADP from the City's Enterprise Funds to pay off their current share of the City's UAL.
• Approved a revised Investment Policy that led the way to allow the City to invest in a municipal security of an Enterprise Fund of the City without a rating and allowing a one-time exception to the City's 5-year maximum maturity for such an investment.
• Authorized the re-establishment of the Upland Parking Authority and the creation of the City of Upland Financing Authority to provide a mechanism for financing arrangements. • Authorized the issuance of$15.5 million in tax exempt borrowing for capital projects of the Water Fund. • Entered into a lease financing arrangement whereby the City of Upland borrowed $15.5 million from the Water Fund and $5 million from the Sewer Fund and remitted the $20.5 million in proceeds as an ADP to CalPERS.

In FY 21/22,CalPERS investment portfolio yielded a-7.5%return,and the pension plan also encountered significant non-investment experience losses.

On December 13,2021,the City Council approved Resolution No.6629 approving and updating the Pension Funding Policy. The policy calls for three approaches by which money would be set aside to fund the City's Section 115 Pension Trust,and one approach to save interest expenses by paying down future CalPERS obligations at a faster pace than required. The largest new UAL bands would be paid over 10 to 15 years instead of 20.

On February 28, 2024,the Finance Committee received an information report on the pension funding policy and its effects on future budgets.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
With CalPERS' FY 21/22 market losses,the effect on the City's upcoming 2-year budget is significant. The City is facing significant challenges as a result of market losses in FY 21/22. CalPERS' -7.5% return, along with non- investment losses in the City's pension plan will significantly affect the upcoming 2-year budget.

The good news is that the positive effects of the City Council's implementation of BLAST have more than offset the negative effects from FY 21/22's returns. As of its June 30,2022 actuarial report,which establishes balances for FY 24/25, CalPERS' Actuarial Valuation Report lists the City's long-term Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) as $98,223,051,down from the June 30,2021 valuate date amount of$99,329,947.

However,with new losses needing to be paid down over 20 years,the City will see increased costs.Upland's required UAL payment to CalPERS for FY 23/24 is$6,417,308. In FY 24/25,Upland will see its required UAL payment rise to $8,430,249. However, the City's Pension Funding Policy calls for paying down new CalPERS liabilities greater than $20 million over 10-15 years instead of the 20 years that CalPERS requires. Paying the liability in a shorter period of time requires additional payments beyond the increases required by CalPERS.

Originally considered approaches included:

Option A—CaIPERS' default payment option,with a 5-year ramp up to paying the full UAL annual payment.

Option B—an Investment Loss 15-Year Reamortization,where FY 21/22's losses were paid over 15 years.

Option C—a Full 15-Year Fresh Start,where all bases are consolidated and the City pays all liabilities in 15 years.

Option D—a 15-Year Fresh Start with 1-Year Ramp,where all bases are consolidated,but year l's payment is lower.

After evaluating the options and going through the budget process,staff eliminated Option B as being too expensive, with a $5.8 million increase on the City's existing $6.4 million annual UAL payment and eliminated Option D as being too complicated for a little benefit.

Then,staff ran a comparison between the two remaining options:

Option A—CaIPERS' default payment option
Option B—a Full 15-year Fresh Start
Though the 15-year Fresh Start includes an additional$1.85 million that needs to be remitted to CalPERS in FY 24/25 and$1.35 million more in FY 25/26,it will result in a$8.95 million savings to the City over the next 20 years. Thanks in part to funds being set aside at the Mid-Year Budget Review in March,the City is able to balance its budget for the upcoming 2-year budget and still meet these additional financial requirements.

The downside to a 15-Year Fresh Start is that the City can't opt to pay CalPERS based on Option A rates going forward. Completing a Fresh Start is irreversible. However,the most significant difference between Option A and B in the coming 15 years is in FY 24/25,where we know we can afford it. After that,the next most significant adverse financial year is FY 38/39,where Option B amounts to a$1.44 million higher payment than Option A. Staffs belief is that the almost $18 million in savings in Fiscal Years 39/40 through FY 43/44 are worth some higher cost years prior to that. In addition,City Council continues to put money into the City's Section 115 Pension Trust in accordance with the Pension Funding Policy. Those funds can be used at any time in the future to assist with CalPERS payments if the City were facing difficult economic circumstances in the future.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is the affirmation of an approach for paying down a liability and is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project"and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The fiscal impact of a 15-year Fresh Start with CalPERS will result in an increased UAL payment of$1,850,889 in FY 24/25,and$1,352,039 in FY 25/26,with an overall interest savings of$8,954,936 over the subsequent 20 years.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project

CaIPERS UAL Payment Options
Option A Default I Option B-15 YR FS I
Total All Plans I Total-All Plans Comparitive Cash Flows o
cc Bud 20 15 BvsA
c
FY Balance Payment Balance Payment 15Yr Level 30-Jun-22 $ 98,223,051I $ 98,223,051
1 24-25 ,$ 98,005,513 $ 8,430,249 $ 98,005,513 $ 10,281,138 -$1,850,889 2 25-26 $ 95,957,727 $ 8,929,099 $ 94,044,940 $ 10,281,138 -$1,352,039 3 26-27 $ 93,255,157 $ 9,194,127 $ 89,815,048 $ 10,281,138 -$1,087,011 4 27-28 $ 90,094,921 $ 9,615,717 $ 85,297,524 $ 10,281,138 -$665,421 5 28-29 $ 86,284,100 $ 10,587,916 $ 80,472,807 $ 10,281,138 $306,778 6 29-30 $ 81,209,436 $ 10,721,019 $ 75,320,010 $ 10,281,138 $439,881 7 30-31 $ 75,652,140 $ 10,857,852 $ 69,816,823 $ 10,281,138 $576,714 8 31-32 $ 69,575,536 $ 10,372,053 $ 63,939,420 $ 10,281,138 $90,915 9 32-33 $ 63,587,771 $ 10,219,287 $ 57,662,352 $ 10,281,138 -$61,851 10 33-34 $ 57,350,710 $ 9,884,843 $ 50,958,444 $ 10,281,138 -$396,295 11 34-35 $ 51,035,157 $ 9,739,271 $ 43,798,671 $ 10,281,138 -$541,867 12 35-36 $ 44,440,590 $ 9,552,694 $ 36,152,033 $ 10,281,138 -$728,444 13 36-37 $ 37,590,408 $ 9,238,048 $ 27,985,423 $ 10,281,138 -$1,043,090 14 37-38 $ 30,599,579 $ 9,046,109 $ 19,263,484 $ 10,281,138 -$1,235,029 15 38-39 $ 23,331,729 $ 8,840,721 $ 9,948,453 $ 10,281,138 -$1,440,417 16 39-40 $ 15,781,924 $ 5,421,866 $ - $ - $5,421,866 17 40-41 $ 11,251,915 $ 5,329,231 $ - $ - $5,329,231 18 41-42 $ 6,509,601 $ 2,391,100 $ - $ - $2,391,100 19 42-43 $ 4,481,191 $ 2,134,613 $ - $ - $2,134,613 20 43-44 $ 2,579,914 $ 2,666,188 $ - $ - $2,666,188 Payment Total $ 163,172,003 $ 154,217,067 Principal $ 98,005,513 $ 98,005,513 Interest Cost $ 65,166,490 $ 56,211,554
$ 8,954,936 $8,954,936
Interest Savings NA 14% 14%

4,c trpl CITY
UPLAND
„.;
"The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krcifit
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: May 13,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:ROBERT D.DALQUEST,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR

LORALEE FARRIS,PLANNING MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF GPA-23-03,ZC-23-03,DPR-23-0012,AND CA-23-17 FOR THE ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A HISTORIC DWELLING LOCATED AT 1010 N.EUCLID AVENUE RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and take the following actions:
1)Adopt a Resolution that General Plan Amendment No.23-0003,Zone Change No.23-0003,Development Plan Review No. 23-0012, and Certificate of Appropriateness No. 23-0017 is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule), Section 15301 (Existing Facilities),and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation)of the CEQA Guidelines; 2)Adopt a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 23-0003 to amend the land use designation of one 8,685 square foot parcel located at 1010 N. Euclid Avenue from Single-Family Medium (SFR-M) to Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use(C/R-MU);
3)Hold first reading by title only,waive further reading,and introduce an Ordinance(Zone Change No.23- 0003),to amend the zoning designation of one 8.685 square foot parcel located at 1010 N.Euclid Avenue from Single- Family Medium(RS-7.5)to Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use(C/R-MU);and 4)Adopt a Resolution approving Development Plan Review No.23-0013 and Certificate of Appropriateness No. CA-23-0017 to adaptively reuse an existing 2,526 square foot historic single-family residence as a professional office, and construct supporting commercial improvements including a paved parking lot and landscaping improvements,located within the City's designated Euclid Avenue historic district,at 1010 N.Euclid Avenue.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goals of encouraging the continued use and adaptive reuse of designated historic resources through application of the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for rehabilitation,reconstruction,and restoration;retaining and attracting land uses that generate revenue to the City;and focusing economic development efforts on attracting and retaining desirable commercial uses along Foothill Boulevard.

BACKGROUND
County Assessor Records indicate that the property under review was constructed circa 1922 as a single-family dwelling. The 2,526 square foot dwelling contains 2 stories,and a partial 256 square foot basement.An existing two- car detached garage is located at the rear. The single-family dwelling is largely intact in its original configuration.

The building permit record indicates that the garage was relocated on the property in 1948, a 230 square foot wood framed rear porch was added in 1948, and additional windows in the dining room were added in 1953. A building permit for a 250 square foot trellis was issued in January 2024 under Certificate of Appropriateness No.24-0002.

On April 10, 2024, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing and voted 5-0 to adopt a resolution (Attachment E)recommending that the City Council find that General Plan Amendment No. 23-0003,Zone Change No.23-0003,Development Plan Review No.23-0012,and Certificate of Appropriateness No.23-0017(the"Project") is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule), Section 15301, Class 1(n) (Existing Facilities), and Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation)of the CEQA Guidelines and recommend at the City Council approve the Project.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
General Plan Amendment
The subject 8,658 square foot parcel is located within the Single-Family Medium(SFR-M)General Plan designation, which is intended for new and existing single-family neighborhoods with slightly higher densities than areas designed as Single-Family Low and is primarily implemented in older existing neighborhoods, allowing a density range from 4 to 10 dwelling units per acre.

The applicant proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation to Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use(C/R- MU) to adaptively reuse the existing dwelling as a commercial office. The C/R-MU designation supports a combination of retail,commercial,and medium-density residential uses with a maximum of 20 dwelling units per acre within compact, walkable and pedestrian-oriented districts. Image 1, below, illustrates the current and proposed General Plan designation,as well as the immediate surrounding area.

Image 1—General Plan Designation
ewx mar
z ?
f
••
4un;n
a-10 :�J I:{
Frieling SFR-Mj Proposed GR•MkJ :�� �
Ell rAV
W F,othilk Bl+•d u�Vo IFoolhdl Blvd roan«..., 'raomw.alw w W Foothill Bivd.m .saw E Foothill Blvd mwmHudw r„,„a.w
ai Foothill gyda- a F Fne[nili ewa..
.,`.�yx.„• — F
0 ,
�, F" T� ye � �^-M'-; �.�.

I
I.i
a-10 0
awar E .. mac
ip ewes meua aWµo dwtx �� -I,{ 4 10 4 10 ,I m EWac eR dtdo, ..,.0 d
z
e a to a-to t a4m 4x dtiar csu'a
With the proposed General Plan land use designation change,the parcel will serve as a low-intensity buffer between the intersection of two major arterials, surrounded by commercial development to the east, west, and south, and the single-family residential development located to the north.

According to County Assessor information,the property has been developed with a single-family dwelling since 1922, however, the context of the area has significantly changed over time, which has seen the widening of Foothill Boulevard and the expansion of commercial development within the immediately surrounding area. The single-family dwelling is located at the northeast corner of two major arterial streets(Foothill Boulevard and Euclid Avenue)and remains the only corner parcel at this intersection not developed or utilized for a commercial use.Traffic and ambient noise levels at the project site significantly exceed those levels typically found in single-family residential areas.

The General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report(SCH No. 1012041006)indicates that the roadway segment of Foothill Boulevard between Euclid Avenue and Campus Avenue sees 26,000 average daily trips and has a 70 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level(CNEL)contour that extends 81 feet north of roadway centerline.Noise level is described in decibels A(dBA),which measures the level of noise to which a person is exposed. CNEL is a weighted average of noise level over time, used to compare the noisiness of neighborhoods. An Existing Roadway Noise Contour Map (Exhibit 5.7-2 of the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report) has been included as Attachment G for reference. The parcel immediately abuts Foothill Boulevard along its southern property line. The existing single-family dwelling is located approximately 65 feet north of the centerline of Foothill Boulevard,within the 70 CNEL area. Table SAF-1, within the Safety Element of the General Plan, indicates that the highest level of noise exposure that is regarded as "Normally Acceptable" for a single-family residential land use as only 60 dBA, whereas 70 dBA is considered"Normally Acceptable"for office/professional uses.

Image 2—Table SAF-1, Safety Element of the Upland General Plan Table SAF-1 Exterior Noise Compatibility Standards Highest Level of Noise Exposure
that is Regarded as
"Normally Acceptable"
Land Use Type (Liln of CNEL)
Residential—Low Density Siatgle-Family,Duplex,Mobile I lames CA F driA Residential—MLI ti-I ainil 65 dB..
hfixed-Use 7.11.dB
'1-aI1 iL oc I chdging—l IntCIs,Motels f.5 dBA
Schools,.L.ibrarics,Churches,Hckspitals,Nursing I Iomes 70 dBA Auditoriums,Concert Halls,Amphitheaters Mitigation based on site-specific study row ALCM,Outdoors Spectator Sports Mitigation based€n site-speci5c study Playgrounds,Neighborhood Parks 710dBA
Golf Courses,,Riding Stables,Water Recreation,Cemeteries 75 dBA (7ftiicc.Buildings—Commercial,Office{Professional 70 dBA t:usrrial,Manufacturing,Utilities,Agriculture 75 dBA SiJureL C-Lov[znor Offibe id Planning liia ReE krrh,Sure of Cali&rcrtia(:L.It'rap Plan Cuirkliries 2001,200:1,pagimi 244-254- General Plan Amendment Findings
Upland Municipal Code Section 17.49.060 provides that the City Council may approve a General Plan Map Amendment,provided all of the following findings can be made first:

1. The proposed General Plan Amendment is in the public interest.

Evidence: The proposed General Plan Amendment is in the public interest because it will aid in the adaptive reuse, rehabilitation, and occupancy of a historic resource, ensuring the building's longevity,reducing the likelihood of prolonged vacancy and disrepair and ensure quality uses along Foothill Boulevard that are also consistent with the Euclid Avenue Historic District.

2. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent and compatible with the rest of the General Plan.

Evidence: The amendment identifies consistency with the General Plan elements including the following goals and polices:
a. Policy LU-3.1 Economic Development.Retain and attract land uses that generate revenue to the City, provide employment for residents while balancing other community needs such as housing,parks and open space,and public facilities.

Fact: The Project will allow an existing building to be adaptively reused as a commercial office, retaining local businesses within the City along two major arterial streets.

b. Policy FA-1.1 Economic Development. Focus economic development efforts on attracting and retaining desirable commercial uses along Foothill Boulevard.

Fact: The Project will attract and retain desirable professional office use along Foothill Boulevard. The applicant intends to relocate their existing law and real estate office(s) into the building, while showcasing an example of historic preservation within the Euclid Avenue Historic District. c. Policy CC-9.13 Adaptive Reuse. Encourage continued use and adaptive reuse of designated historic resources through application of the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for rehabilitation, reconstruction, and restoration.

Fact: The Project will directly implement an adaptive reuse project, encouraged within the Community Character Element,as a historic preservation tool to ensure the longevity and functionality of the historic property. The applicant has an approved Mills Act contract for the property and is rehabilitating, repairing, and constructing supporting improvements that are consistent with the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for rehabilitation. d. Policy ES-4.3 Economic Impacts of Land Conversion. Consider long-term fiscal and economic impacts of any conversion of employment lands to other uses when updating zoning.

Fact: The Project would directly support the long-term viability of the property, allowing the structures to be adaptively reused as a professional office use, generating employment, and aiding in the best utilization of the structure within the context of the immediately surrounding area. The adaptive reuse will encourage that the structure remains occupied and avoids prolonged vacancy which risks it falling into disrepair.

3. The potential effects of the proposed General Plan Amendment have been evaluated and have been determined not to be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare.

Evidence: The potential effects of the project have been evaluated. The General Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, but rather allow a property to be utilized as an office use to comply with "Normally Acceptable" noise levels as detailed in Table SAF-1 (Exterior Noise Compatibility Standards)within the Safety Element of the General Plan.

4. The proposed General Plan Amendment has been processed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Government Code and CEQA.

Evidence: The General Plan Amendment has been processed in full compliance with the provisions of the California Government Code,CEQA,and the City of Upland Municipal Code.

Zone Change
The subject property is located within the Single-Family Medium(RS-7.5)zoning district,which is intended as a zone for lots with a minimum area of 7,500 square feet, characterized by mid-size single-family dwellings, ample open space, and lush landscaping. The applicant proposes to amend the zoning designation to Commercial/Residential Mixed Use(C/R-MU) so that it will be consistent with the zoning designation to the south, east,and west and allow the existing historic building to be adaptively reused as an office use.Presently,the property,located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Euclid Avenue, is the only corner zoned for single family residential, as the other three have all been zoned for Commercial/Residential Mixed Use. The rezone will bring all four corners into the same designation and maintain a row of C/R-MU along Foothill Boulevard as a buffer between the major arterial and the residential uses further north.

The C/R-MU designation is intended to support the development of compact, walkable, and pedestrian-oriented districts with a combination of retail, local-serving commercial and medium-density residential developments, however, the applicant has specified they clearly intend to use the building as a professional office. The use of the

existing structure as an office is listed as a permitted use in this zoning district, however, site improvements are necessary to provide on-site parking and landscaping that support an office use.

Image 3,below,illustrates the current and proposed zoning designation,as well as the immediate surrounding area.

Image 3—Zoning Designation
g
Fmowg a5".5 Zone_
w Fown�i�e�w nnn,..mw EFnmeii eiw
111111pkiiim.

Zone Change Findings
Per Upland Municipal Code Section 17.48.060,the review and decision-making authority may approve an application for a Zoning Map Amendment if the proposed project is supported by all of the following findings:

1. Finding: The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable community or specific plan as provided by Government Code Section 65860.

Evidence: The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan, with the General Plan Amendment as proposed, and with the Upland Municipal Code as provided by Government Code Section 65860.

2. Finding: The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, or welfare of the City.

Evidence: The potential effects of the project have been evaluated. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare.The Zone Change would result in the extension of the existing Commercial/Residential-Mixed Use district,located to the south,east,and west,that is prevalent along this segment of Foothill Boulevard, would allow the dwelling to be adaptively reused as a professional office and improved in such a way to meet required development standards and preserve the historic streetscape along Euclid Avenue.

3. Finding: The affected site is physically suitable in terms of design,location, shape, size,and other characteristics to ensure that the proposed uses and development will not endanger,jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property,surrounding properties,and the community at large.

Evidence: The affected site is suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size and other characteristics, as the property is already developed, and the improvements related to the adaptive reuse of the dwelling as an office meet the development standards within the Upland Municipal Code. The use will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property, surrounding properties, and the community at large as it has been designed and conditioned appropriately to ensure compatibility and safety of the proposed use, and would not introduce a zoning district not already prevalent along this segment of Foothill Boulevard.

Senate Bill(SB)330(Housing Crisis Act of 2019)
Senate Bill 330, also known as the Housing Crisis Act of 2019,became effective on January 1,2020,and expanded and/or amended state legislation with broad goals of facilitating increased production of housing. The bill added Section 66300(b)(1)to the California Government Code,which prohibits a city from changing the general plan land

use designation or zoning designation of parcels to a less intensive residential use or reducing the residential intensity allowed through reduction to density, or development standards that would apply to residential development (i.e. height,floor area ratio,open space or lot size requirements, setbacks,lot coverage)that would lessen the intensity of housing. These regulations ensure that there be no net loss of residential capacity within the City,unless this loss is replaced concurrently elsewhere.

Changing the General Plan designation from Single-Family Medium(SFR-M)to Commercial/Residential Mixed Use (C/R-MU)and the zoning designation from Single-Family Medium(RS-7.5)to Commercial/Residential Mixed Use (C/R-MU) would not result in downzoning the property to a zoning designation that requires a lower residential maximum density. As such,there would be"no net loss"as a result of zoning. The RS-7.5 designation only allows one single family residence on the property. The C/R-MU zone allows residential uses at a maximum density of 20 units per acre. While the applicant does not intend to use the property as a residence and proposes to adaptively reuse the existing dwelling as a professional office as a mechanism to preserve it,the General Plan and Zone Change does not remove the ability to utilize the property for residential through an act of downzoning.

Development Plan Review
Adaptive Reuse
The applicant proposes to adaptively reuse the existing single-family dwelling as a professional office.

Adaptive reuse is the process of reusing an existing building for a purpose other than which it was originally built or designed for. This method is often utilized as an effective strategy in historic preservation,offering a sustainable approach to revitalizing and increasing the long-term functionality of historic structures while preserving their cultural significance and intrinsic historic value. This technique repurposes historic structures,often when the context of the surrounding area and the long-term viability of the original use have changed over time,preventing their decay or demolition. As noted above,the City's General Plan directly encourages adaptive reuse as a historic preservation strategy to retain the architectural heritage of the community.

Adaptive reuse,as a historic preservation strategy,has been successfully utilized within the City in the past.

In 2015, an existing single-family dwelling under similar circumstances was converted to an office use at 965 N. 2'Avenue, approximately 470 feet east of the subject site, also within the Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use zone. This property, located to the south of Baker's drive-through restaurant, serves as a transitional buffer between the more intense commercial use to the north and the residential neighborhood to the south,functioning similarly to the proposed project at 1010 N.Euclid Avenue.

Image 4—965 N.2°d Avenue
► :

Illii .: 0 4) '' - .
........14.4 . I '...:...

Adaptive reuse has also been utilized on Euclid Avenue and throughout the Euclid Avenue Historic District as a historic preservation tool to retain the streetscape and residential historic character of Euclid Avenue, which also functions as a major arterial street and thoroughfare through the City.The table below provides a list of these properties as an example of this established practice, and the following image provides an illustration of several of these properties.

Table 1 —Adaptively Reused Dwellings for Office Uses
309 N.Euclid Avenue 219 N.Euclid Avenue
273 N.Euclid Avenue 354 S.Euclid Avenue
265 N.Euclid Avenue 378 S.Euclid Avenue
231 N.Euclid Avenue 396 S.Euclid Avenue
225 N.Euclid Avenue

Image 5—Examples of Adaptive Use on Euclid Avenue
41011111114.
lio
_,_., "0:00., ,,,,,,
d"ir !ilk
--, —
1444
a
liate .411 - --' ''-. 4;'''.4 I/ 1 t. dip p, Improvements are required to support the adaptive reuse of these buildings,such as paved off-street parking and handicap accessible path of travel improvements that are necessary for commercial uses,however,these are best utilized when these improvements are added to the rear(as is proposed in the current application), allowing the repurposed single-family dwelling to continue to blend into the surrounding neighborhood and maintain the residential streetscape.

Site Plan
The 8,685 square foot site contains an existing 2-story,2,526 square foot single family dwelling with a 360 square foot detached 2-car garage (Attachment H — Project Plans). The applicant proposes to maintain, rehabilitate,and utilize all existing structures. No demolitions nor building additions are proposed.As such, there are no changes to existing building setbacks, lot coverage, or building heights. The applicant received approval of a previous Minor Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a trellis on a portion of the west and south elevations. The applicant proposes a wrought iron fence with block base (not to exceed 3.5 feet in height within the front and street side setback area)around the front yard area.A parking lot,further evaluated below,will be paved to the rear of the structure,ensuring that the streetscape along Euclid Avenue retains its residential character. Wrought iron gates will secure the parking lot when the office is closed, at the alley driveway and at the mid-point of the one-way driveway, approximately 55 feet setback from the front property line. The parking lot is already contained by existing 6-foot block walls with a brick cap, located along the north,south,and east property lines.

Parking and Circulation
To accommodate professional office use,the area to the rear of the dwelling will be paved to construct three additional parking stalls,including one ADA van-accessible stall,as well as new landscaping planters within the parking lot area.The existing detached garage will maintain two additional parking stalls,for a total of 5 spaces. Office uses require 1 stall for each 400 square feet. The first and second floor contain 2,526 gross square feet. Approximately 2,233 square feet of the structure will be usable office area, with the excluded square footage including incidental areas such as hallways and closets. Based on the net square footage for usable office space, 5 parking spaces will be required and 5 spaces will be provided.As such,the off-street parking provided will be able to adequately accommodate the needs of an office use. The parking stalls will be angled at 60 degrees and have been designed to meet the minimum stall width(9 feet)and depth(19 feet).

Eighteen feet of clearance will be provided to accommodate back-up.

Ingress to the parking lot will be through the one-way alley to the rear of the property.The existing driveway on the north side of the building will maintain its existing clearance width and provide egress through an existing one-way driveway to Euclid Avenue. This driveway will be preserved to maintain the existing historic character and configuration of the property, as seen from Euclid Avenue. A condition of approval

has been incorporated that the driveways be appropriately signed and marked to indicate that the one-way driveway to Euclid Avenue is"exit only".An accessible path of travel will be added from the loading zone of the van-accessible parking stall to the ground-level entrance door, and from the entrance to the public sidewalk along Euclid Avenue.The Public Works Department has incorporated a condition that the right-of- way be appropriately signed and striped to ensure vehicles do not park on the street along the frontage,due to the proximity to the intersection.

Landscaping
Within the front yard area, the applicant will rehabilitate the lawn area and add new decorative pavers to create a new courtyard area with a small decorative fountain.In addition to the existing trees within the front yard area,the applicant proposes to plant dwarf"Little Gem"Magnolia trees within the parking lot area, as this species can adapt well to smaller landscaping planters. In addition,the applicant intends to supplement the tree palette with decorative evergreen accent trees,like Carrotwood,African Sumac,and Strawberry trees, which blend in with the existing tree species on-site. The applicant's site plan utilizes decorative and flowering shrubs around the fence line,within the parking lot planters,and along the front of the house,and plan to include species such a Camelia, Heavenly Bamboo, and hedges to match existing species (i.e.

Frasier's Photinia), as well as a variety drought-tolerant succulents. Fig vines will be planted to cover the block wall along Foothill Boulevard and the alley to the south as an aesthetic improvement and graffiti deterrent. Examples of these species have been included as Attachment I—Landscaping Palette. The front yard and street side yard will be fully landscaped, with the exception of driving and parking areas, which have been designed with landscaping planters to accommodate parking lot trees. Table 2,below, describes the project's consistency with landscaping requirements.

Table 2—Landscaping Requirements
Development Standard Required Provided
Parking Lot Landscaping 8% of the parking lot area 14.6% (minimum)
Landscape Islands 5 feet wide 11'10"max,6' average Use of Side Yards May be used for parking if the Averages 5' in parking lot area, average width of 5'along frontage is significantly exceeds minimum maintained across entire frontage
Minimum Site 10% 19.8%
Landscaping
Floor Plan
The floor plan(Attachment H—Project Plans)indicates minimal tenant improvements are proposed,beyond those required for building code and accessibility requirements associated with an office use. The floor plan will be utilized as is.The dwelling's bedrooms,great room,study, and breakfast nook will be converted into offices, and the dining room will be utilized as a receptionist/waiting room area. The 256 square foot basement will not be utilized for office purposes but may be utilized for related storage. The applicant has taken great care to design the plans for the conversion around the effort of honoring the history of the dwelling and maintaining the existing layout.

Operational Characteristics
The property will operate as a professional office,intended to be used by the property owners for a law office.

The applicant anticipates having a total of 3 employees, with 1-2 having part-time schedules. Professional office uses are considered to be very low-intensity uses, and maintain hours of operation that occur during the daytime hours of the work week. Typical hours of operation would be 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.and services provided utilize scheduled appointments. Due to the nature of the use, drop-in visits are uncommon and many of the office's appointments and meetings also occur virtually over platforms such as Zoom.

Development Plan Review Findings
Per Upland Municipal Code Section 17.44.030(H) the review and decision-making authority may approve an application for a Development Plan Review application only if the proposed project complies with applicable standards in the Zoning Ordinance, other City ordinances,the General Plan, and any other applicable community or specific plans,and as supported by all of the following findings:

1. Finding:The design and layout of the proposed project will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of existing and future neighboring properties and structures.

Evidence:The design and layout of the project includes adequate vehicle and pedestrian circulation, meets parking requirements, setbacks, landscaping requirements, and zoning regulations. The project is consistent with the Upland Municipal Code and has been conditioned appropriately.

Therefore, the proposed project, as conditioned, will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of existing and future neighboring properties and structures.

2. Finding: The proposed architectural design makes use of appropriate materials,texture, and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing and appropriately maintained.

Evidence: The project does not include any modifications to the architectural design. The existing historic structures will be rehabilitated,repaired,and maintained,preserving the architectural style's defining characteristics and materials.

3. Finding: The proposed landscaping design, including color, location, size, texture, type, and coverage of plant materials, as well as provisions for irrigation, maintenance, and protection of landscaping elements,will complement structures and provide an attractive environment.

Evidence: The preliminary landscape design proposes the use of plant material that provides varied color and texture, with consistency to existing plant species on the property and within the surrounding vicinity. The landscaping will be fully irrigated and has been designed to maintain the residential character of the streetscape of the Euclid Avenue Historic District, while providing landscaping in the new parking area to the rear of the building in accordance with parking lot landscaping requirements in the Upland Municipal Code.

4. Finding: The proposed design will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,or be injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed project.

Evidence: The proposed design includes adequate ingress and egress,has been conditioned by the Upland Police Department with multiple safety requirements,and will include complete plan check review by the Upland Building Division for an occupancy change and parking lot construction. The project will not impact the surrounding neighborhood,is considered a low intensity office use that does not generate significant traffic, and screens and secures the parking area with appropriate fencing and landscaping.Therefore,the project will not be injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed project.

Certificate of Appropriateness
Historic Compatibility
The property is located within the Euclid Avenue Historic District and the structures contribute to the historic character of the district as a whole. The structure represents a classic example of the Spanish Revival architectural style,which is typified by a low-pitched roof,red tile roof covering,prominent arches beneath the arcaded porch roof and on the front parabolic arched window,stucco or tile decorative vents,elaborated chimney tops,and a stucco wall surface. Roughly half of the examples of this style has a cross-gabled roof, as evident in the subject structure,with one prominent,front-facing gable,and wings with different heights.

Spanish Revival, as an architectural style, is more common in California, where original Spanish Colonial building occurred and continued into the 19th Century. The applicant entered into a Mills Act Contract with the City in 2023, which sets out a 10-year plan for rehabilitation, maintenance, and repair of the historic structure. The applicant has taken great care to rehabilitate the dwelling, which sat vacant for many years, with an emphasis on historical accuracy, maintaining historic materials and fixtures, and preserving the defining characteristics of the architectural style.

As designed, the project will be compatible in design, scale, and architectural character with other developments along Euclid Avenue within its vicinity. The project will retain the appearance from the street of a single-family residence. Any future signage will be subject to separate review and approval by the Development Services Department to ensure it blends harmoniously with the building and its environs and

will enhance the streetscape. The landscaping proposed will complement the scenic qualities of the site and the historic corridor, maintaining the residential streetscape and incorporating species that exist on the property and are found throughout the area.

Furthermore, staff received a letter from Upland Heritage, dated March 24, 2024, in support of the project (Attachment J), commending the property owners for restoring the property in line with best historic preservation practices.

Consistency with Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties A Certificate of Appropriateness is required for the exterior alteration of any cultural resource listed on the register or determined eligible for listing in a historic resources survey,and it required for the change of the use of the structure. To ensure that historic integrity of the historic dwelling and the surrounding district is maintained, the development is required to comply with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation(also incorporated into the Municipal Code as Section 17.26.070).These have been evaluated within Table 3,below.

Table 3—Rehabilitation Guidelines
A property shall be used as it was historically The property will be adaptively reused. There will not or be given a new use that requires minimal be any change to distinctive materials or features. change to its distinctive materials, features, Change to spaces and spatial relationships will be spaces,and spatial relationships. minimal and limited to the paving of parking and landscaping planters, which will be located to the rear of the building where it is not visible from Euclid
Avenue.

The historic character of a property shall be The historic character will be retained and preserved. retained and preserved. The removal of The applicant has adhered to following the Secretary of distinctive materials or alteration of features, the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, following spaces, and spatial relationships that best practice guidance for preserving historic integrity. characterize a property shall be avoided. The applicant has taken great care to repair existing materials as a priority, maintaining the existing form
and appearance of the structures.

Each property shall be recognized as a physical There are no alterations proposed that will create a false record of its time,place,and use. Changes that sense of historical development, which would be create a false sense of historical development, caused in situations of trying to make new such as adding conjectural features or elements improvements to a property look like they were from other buildings,shall not be undertaken. constructed at the same time as the original building without incorporating subtle and complimentary
differentiation. No conjectural features or elements
from other buildings will be undertaken.The buildings
are being rehabilitated and restored. New
improvements are related to exterior improvements for
parking and landscaping.

Changes to a property that have acquired All structures will be retained and preserved.There are historic significance in their own right shall be no demolitions proposed as part of the project scope. retained and preserved. There are no records of previous building additions to the dwelling that would be affected by this provision.

Evidence in the permit record indicates the garage was
constructed after the dwelling, however, it too will be retained and continued to be used as parking.

Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and All distinctive elements described will be preserved. construction techniques or examples of There are no changes to the elevation of the dwelling, craftsmanship that characterize a property shall beyond that of repair,restoration,and rehabilitation. be preserved.

Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired No distinctive materials have been proposed to be rather than replaced. Where the severity of replaced as part of the adaptive reuse. Conditions of deterioration requires replacement of a approval, as well as the Municipal Code, will require distinctive feature,the new feature shall match that should historic materials be determined to be too the old in design, color, texture, and, where deteriorated to repair,the applicant is to work with staff

possible, materials. Replacement of missing to ensure replacement will be in-kind and documented features shall be substantiated by documentary with evidence. and physical evidence.

Chemical or physical treatments, if No chemical or physical treatments are proposed to the appropriate, shall be undertaken using the building. This has,nonetheless, been incorporate as a gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause condition of approval. damage to historic materials shall not be used.

Archeological resources shall be protected and Ground disturbance on the property is limited and preserved in place. If such resources must be minimal in scope, related directly to paving parking disturbed, mitigation measures shall be stalls to the rear, installing accessible pathways, and undertaken. installing landscaping and irrigation. The risk of finding archaeological resources, at minimal soil
depths disturbed, is low. Nonetheless, standard
conditions of approval for inadvertent discovery of
cultural and tribal cultural resources have been
incorporated, should any artifacts be found
unexpectedly during construction. -
New additions, exterior alterations, or related There are no new building additions proposed. Exterior new construction shall not destroy historic alterations will not destroy historic materials, features, materials, features, and spatial relationships or spatial relationships that characterize the property. that characterize the property. Improvements related to the parking lot will be located to the rear of the property where screened from view
from the public right-of-way. Landscaping
improvements in the front yard and street side yard are compatible with the residential character of the historic district. _
New additions and adjacent or related new No new building additions are proposed; however, the construction shall be undertaken in such a parking lot improvements are designed so that if they manner that, if removed in the future, the are ever removed in the future, the essential form and essential form and integrity of the historic integrity of the historic property and its environment property and its environment would be would be unimpaired. unimpaired.

Certificate of Appropriateness Findings
Per Upland Municipal Code Section 17.26.110(G) the review and decision-making authority may approve an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness application only if the proposed project complies with applicable standards in the Zoning Ordinance, other City ordinances,the General Plan, and any other applicable community or specific plans,and as supported by all of the following findings:

1. The proposed alteration is compatible with and will not destroy or adversely affect architectural features of the cultural resource.

Evidence: The proposed alteration has been designed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings for Rehabilitation. The proposal maintains the existing structures,their defming characteristics,and materials.There are no building alterations or expansions proposed.

2. The proposed alteration complies with the order of preference outlined in Section 17.26.060(B) (Alteration of Historic Resources) for the preservation of historic features, and provides evidence of hardship in cases where the first order of preference is not feasible.

Building code violations are not in and of themselves justification for not meeting the established order of preference.

Evidence: Section 17.25.060(B)contains the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Rehabilitation.As detailed within the staff report,the use will comply with these Rehabilitation Guidelines, as the project: allows for the buildings to be adaptively reused;does not change any distinctive materials or features; locates parking to the rear to minimize any impact to spatial relationships and spaces; retains the historic character of the

property;contains minimal ground disturbance;will not use harsh chemical of physical treatments; and has been conditioned appropriately.

3. The proposed alteration is consistent and compatible with the architectural style of surrounding cultural resources.

Evidence: The proposed alteration is consistent and compatible with the surroundings.There are no new buildings or building additions proposed.All new parking lot improvements are located to the rear of the building where they will be screened from view from the surrounding area.

4. The proposed colors, finishes, materials, fencing, decorative features, details, and accessory structures are consistent and compatible with the existing structure and the surrounding cultural resources.

Evidence: There are no changes proposed to the façade of the building. The dwelling was recently repainted, using historic evidence, to return the buildings back to its original color palette. The existing finishes and materials will remain. New gates and fences will utilize decorative block and wrought iron materials,which have already been established on the property and are consistent with the architectural style of the building.

5. The proposed construction, removal, rehabilitation, alteration,remodeling, excavation, or exterior alteration conforms to the prescriptive standards as adopted by the Upland City Council/Planning Commission,and does not adversely affect the character of the district.

Evidence: The proposed construction related to the adaptive reuse conforms to the prescriptive standards contained with the Municipal Code for the proposed zoning designation and follows the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.

6. In the case of construction of a new improvement, building or structure upon a historic site, the exterior of such improvements will not adversely affect and will be compatible with the external appearance of existing designated improvements,buildings,and structures on said site.

Evidence: No new building or structures are proposed on the property. There are no façade improvements proposed as part of the adaptive reuse project. The external improvements are related to the construction of a parking lot, landscaping planters, walkways, and fencing. These improvements have been designed to be compatible with the surrounding area and have a negligible effect on the historic district. The improvements maintain the residential character of the streetscape along Euclid Avenue and all parking has been located to the rear, where screened from view and accessible via an alley way to the east of the site.

7. The proposed alteration considers mass,proportions,setbacks and nature of openings in the façade.

Evidence: There are no exterior alterations to the existing dwelling as part of the adaptive reuse.

The related site improvements will not change the massing,proportions, setbacks or nature of the openings in the façade.

8. The proposed alteration complies with the Rehabilitation Guidelines outlined in Section 17.26.070(Rehabilitation Guidelines).

Evidence: The proposed alteration complies with the Rehabilitation Guidelines,as described in the analysis contained within the staff report above.

9. The proposed alteration complies with all other applicable design guidelines and standards,CEQA Guidelines,and Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.

Evidence:The alteration complies with all design guidelines and standards,is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act,and has been designed to comply with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.

10. Wherever feasible, the alteration takes full advantage of the State Historic Building Code and Uniform Code for Building Conservation.

Evidence: The project will be able to utilize the State Historic Building Code where feasible and applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule), Section 15301(n) (Existing Facilities), and Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the CEQA Guidelines. The "general rule" applies to those projects where it is seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, as the project involves a mapping change of a single parcel for a low-intensity use. Section 15301(n) specifically applies to the conversion of a single-family residence to office use. Section 15331(n) applies to rehabilitation and improvement projects to historic resources that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preservation, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings(1995),Weeks and Grimmer.

FISCAL IMPACTS
Approval of the Project will support the long-term viability of existing historic structure,allowing for a professional office to occupy the structure and conduct business that is compatible with the surrounding area. The improved economic viability of the property will continue to generate business license and property taxes. No fiscal impact to the general fund will occur as a result of this project.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Determine to be Exempt