APPENDIX A-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
GENERAL FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
I. Inventory of Existing General Government Facilities
Facility Facility Units Quantity
Buildings Square Feet 74,836
Land Acres 17
Vehicles Vehicle 14
Equipment Integrated Unit 1
II. Existing General Government Facilities EDU Calculation Residents per Unit/ Total
Number of Number of Units/ Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Land Use Type Persons Served Non-Res 1,000 SF 1,000 Non-Res.SF per 1,000 Non-Res SF EDUs Residential 78,285 29,248 2.68 1.00 29,248 Subtotal Residential 78,285 29,248 29,248 Commercial 7,702 7,112,985 1.08 0.81 5,755 Office 4,386 2,614,538 1.68 1.25 3,277 Industrial 2,705 4,869,099 0.56 0.42 2,021 Subtotal Non-residential 14,792 14,596,622 11,053 Total 93,077 40,301
III. Existing Facility Standard
Facility Units per
Facility Type 13] Facility Units Quantity 1,000 Persons Served Buildings Square Feet 74,836 804
Land Acres 17 0.183
Vehicles Vehicle 14 0.150
Equipment Integrated Unit 1 0.011
IV. Future General Government Facilities EDU Calculation Residents per Unit/ Total
Number of Number of Units/ Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Land Use Type Persons Served Non-Res 1,000 SF 1,000 Non-Res.SF per 1,000 Non-Res SF EDUs Residential 7,594 2,837 2.68 1.00 2,837 Subtotal Residential 7,594 2,837 NA NA 2,837 Commercial 640 590,884 1.08 0.81 478 Office 364 217,193 1.68 1.25 272 Industrial 225 404,482 0.56 0.42 168 Subtotal Non-Residential 1,229 1,212,558 NA NA 918 (Total 8,823 NA NA 3,755
V. Future Facility Standard
Facility Units Facilities Units Funded
Facility Type Facility Units per 1,000 Persons Served by New Development Buildings Square Feet 804 7,094
Land Acres 0.183 1.617
Vehicles Vehicle 0.150 1.327
Equipment Integrated Unit 0.011 0.095
VI. General Government Summary Cost Data
Facility Units Funded Total Facility Cost for
Facility Type Facility Units by Future Development Cost Per Unit Future Development Cost per EDU Buildings Square Feet 7,094 $554 $3,933,133 $1,047 Land Acres 1.617 $1,097,268 $1,774,379 $473 Vehicles Vehicle 1.327 $33,475 $44,422 $12 Equipment Integrated Unit 0.095 $7,483,600 $709,358 $189 Offsetting Revenue $523,365 $139
Total $5,937,927 $1,581
Land Use Fees Units/Sq.Ft Costs Financed by DIF Residential $0.77 2,837 $4,486,098
Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $1,279 590,884 755,899
Office (Per 1,000 SF) $1,982 217,193 430,484
Industrial (Per 1,000) $656 404,482 265,446
$5,937,927
(2.0%Administration Costs included)
Land Use Calculated Fees
Single Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.78
Multi-Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.78
Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $1,305
Office (Per 1,000 SF) $2,022
Industrial (Per 1,000) $669
APPENDIX A-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
POLICE FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
Facility Facility Units Quantity
Buildings Square Feet 41,964
Land Acres 6
Vehicles Vehicle 83
Equipment Integrated Unit 1
II. Existin.General Government Facilities EDU Calculation Residents per Unit/ Total
Number of Number of Units/ Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Land Use Type Persons Served Non-Res 1,000 SF 1,000 Non-Res.SF per 1,000 Non-Res SF EDUs Residential 78,285 29,248 2.68 1.00 29,248 Subtotal Residential 78,285 29,248 29,248 Commercial 7,702 7,112,985 1.08 0.81 5,755 Office 4,386 2,614,538 1.68 1.25 3,277 Industrial 2,705 4,869,099 0.56 0.42 2,021 Subtotal Non-residential 14,792 14,596,622 11,053 Total 93,077 40,301
III. Existing Facility Standar
Facility Units per
Facility Type(31 Facility Units Quantity 1,000 Persons Served Buildings Square Feet 41,964 451
Land Acres 6 0.062
Vehicles Vehicle 83 0.892
Equipment Integrated Unit 1 0.011
IV. Future General Government Facilities EDU Calculation Residents per Unit/ Total
Number of Number of Units/ Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Land Use Type Persons Served Non-Res 1,000 SF 1,000 Non-Res.SF per 1,000 Non-Res SF EDUs Residential 7,594 2,837 2.68 1.00 2,837 Subtotal Residential 7,594 2,837 NA NA 2,837 Commercial 640 590,884 1.08 0.81 478 Office 364 217,193 1.68 1.25 272 Industrial 225 404,482 0.56 0.42 168 Subtotal Non-Residential 1,229 1,212,558 NA 918 Total 8,823 NA NA 3,755
V. Future Facility Standard
Facility Units Facilities Units Funded
Facility Type Facility Units per 1,000 Persons Served by New Development Buildings Square Feet 451 3,978
Land Acres 0.062 0.550
Vehicles Vehicle 0.892 7.867
Equipment Integrated Unit 0.011 0.095
VI. General Government Summary Cost Data
Facility Units Funded Total Facility Cost for
Facility Type Facility Units by Future Development Cost Per Unit Future Development Cost per EDU Buildings Square Feet 3,978 $593 $2,360,339 $629 Land Acres 0.550 $1,097,268 $603,247 $161 Vehicles Vehicle 7.867 $45,292 $356,331 $95 Equipment Integrated Unit 0.095 $9,788,004 $927,788 $247 Offsetting Revenue $964,698 $257
Total $3,283,007 $874
Land Use Units/Sq.Ft Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.42 2,837 $2,480,308
Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $707 590,884 417,927 Office (Per 1,000 SF) $1,096 217,193 238,009 Industrial (Per 1,000) $363 404,482 146,762
$3,283,007
(2.0%Administration Costs included)
Land Use Calculated Fees
Single Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.43
Multi-Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.43
Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $721
Office (Per 1,000 SF) $1,118
Industrial (Per 1,000) $370
APPENDIX A-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
PARKS FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
Potential Number of Potential
User of Facilities Recreation Number of Work Hours per Weekend Days Recreation Hours Work Day Days per Week Weekend Day per Week Hours per Resident non-working 12 5 12 2 84
Resident working 3 5 12 2 39
Total Hours of Potential Parks and Recreations Usage per Week (Single-Family) Number per Potential Potential
Type of Resident Household Recreation Recreation hours/week per hours/week
person per household
Resident non-working 0.90 84 76
Resident working[4] 1.77 39 69
Total 2.68 145
NEW DEVELOPMENT(EBU)CALCULATION
rule I foal
Residents per Recreation Number of Number of Land Use Type Unit Hours/Week per EBU per Unit Units EBUs 1 r..:•
Residential 2.68 145 1.00 2,837 2,837 2,837
Facilities Standards'
Proposed Persons per
Residential Household
Acres per 1,000 Residents(6) Facility Standard (Residential per (Acres per Unit)
Resident)
3 0.003 2.68 -
Number of Acres Needed to Meet Facility Standards
ark Acres Total Number
Land Use Typ- Required per Number of Units of Park Acres Unit Required
Residential 0.0080298 2,837 22.78
Total 22.78
Projected Facility Costs Necessary to Meet Facility Standards •st Per Acre Facility Costs
Park Improvements 22.78 $1,238,090 $28,205,494 Offsettting Revenues $691,695
$27,513,799
Cost Allocation
Allocation to New Development 100%
Total Allocated to New Development $27,513,799
Cost Per EBU $9,698
EBU per Unit Allocation Rate per Number of Cost Financed %Cost Land Use Type Unit Units Financed Residential 1.00 $9,698 2,837 $27,513,799 100.0% $27,513,799 100.0%
Land Use Type Fees Units
Detached Dwellings $9,698 per unit
Costs
Land Use Fees Units Financed by
DIF
Residential (Per Sq.ft.) $4.71 2,837 $27,513,799 $27,513,799
Single Family (Per Sq.ft.) $4.71
Multi-Family (Per Sq.ft.) $4.71
(2.0%Administration Costs included)
Land Use Calculated Fees
Single Family (Per Sq.ft.) $4.80
Multi-Family (Per Sq.ft.) $4.80
APPENDIX A-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
TRANSPORTATION FEE CALCULATION
I.Existing EBU Calculation
Trip Generation Number of Existing Existing Non- Peak Hour Trips Rate per Unit/per EBUs(Per
1,000 Non-Res.S.F. Units Residential S.F. Unit/1,000 SF) Residential 0.80 29,248 23,304
Commercial 2.85 7,112,985 20,299
Office 1.71 2,614,538 4,471
Industrial 0.52 4,869,099 2,508
Total 50,581
II.Future EBU Calculation
Trip Generation Number of Projected Non-
Rate Peak Hour Trips
per Unit/per Projected Units Residential S.F. EBUs(Per n se a 1,000 Non-Res.S.F. Unit/1,000 SF) _ Residential 0.80 2,837 2,261
Commercial 2.85 590,884 1,686
Office 1.71 217,193 371
Industrial 0.52 404,482 208
Total 4,526
III. Proposed Facilities Cost
Transportation Facilities Cost $9,808,129
Offsetting Revenues $448,794
Total Facilities Cost $9,359,335
IV. Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development(based on Daily Trips) Cost- lage of Facility
:Us) Allocated Cost
Existing Development 50,581 91.79% $8,590,569 New Development 4,526 8.21% $768,766 Total Facilities Cost 55,108 100.00% $9,359,335 V. Allocation of Facilities to New Development(based on New EDUs) ility Cost Facilities
Projected Allocated to Cost Per
Daily Trips New Development Daily Trip
Transportation Facilities Cost 4,526 $768,766 $170 Total Facilities Cost per Daily Trip 4,526 $170 VI.Transportation Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Unit/per 1,000 Non-Res.S.F.
Estimated Trip
Generation Rate pe
Unit/ s per 1,000 Non-
per 1,000 Non-Res. Res.S.F. Cost Financed b
S.F. Impact Fees
Residential 0.80 $135 $383,924
Commercial 2.85 $485 $286,386
Office 1.71 $290 $63,078
Industrial 0.52 $87 $35,379
Initial Allocation to New Development $768,766 Total Allocated to Existing Development $8,590,569 Total Facilities Costs $9,359,335
Land Use Units/Sq.Ft Costs Financed by DIF
Residential (Per Sq.ft.) $0.07 2,837 $383,924 Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $485 $590,884 $286,386 Office (Per 1,000 SF) $290 $217,193 $63,078 Industrial (Per 1,000) $87 $404,482 $35,379 $768,766
(2.0%Administration Costs included)
Land Use Calculated Fees
Single Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.07
Multi-Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.07
Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $494
Office (Per 1,000 SF) $296
Industrial (Per 1,000) $89
APPENDIX A-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
WATER FEE CALCULATION
Existing Future
Water Generation Expected
Rate Dwelling Density(DU Water Volume Dwelling Density Water Volume Total Water FEE Revenue from Land Use SCHEDULE
(gal/day per DU) Units(DU) per Acre) (gal/day) Units(DU) (DU per (gal/day) volume New Acre) (per DU)
(1] Development
Residential
Residential 474 29,248 - 13,863,552 2,837 - 1,344,796 15,208,348 $1,766.54 $5,011,876 Total Residential 29,248 - 13,863,552 2,837 - 1,344,796 15,208,348 1 $5,011,876 FEE
Water Generation Floor Area Floor SCHEDULE Expected Rate Floor Area WaterVolume Floor Area Area Water Volume Total Water (per 1,000 Revenue from Land Use (square
(gal/day per Ratio feet) (gal/day) Ratio (square (gal/day) volume square New 1,000 square feet) feet) ft.Floor Development area)
Non-Residential
Commercial 115 0.50 7,112,985 816,458 0.50 590,884 67,824 884,282 427.79 $252,772 Office 161 0.50 2,614,538 420,151 0.50 217,193 34,902 455,053 598.90 $130,077 Industrial 92 0.50 4,869,099 447,117 0.50 404,482 37,142 484,259 342.23 $138,425 Total Non-Residential 14,596,622 1,683,726 1,212,558 139,869 1,823,595 $521,273 TOTALS 15,547,278 1,484,665 17,031,942 $5,533,150 Total Water Improvement Cost $63,747,890 Funded From Other Sources: $57,942,658 Offsetting Revenue $272,083
Adjusted Water Improvement G $63,475,807 Existing Dev 91.28% $57,942,658 Cost per 1,000 gal/day volume $3,726.87 New Develo 8.72% $5,533,150 Cost Per $3.73 $63,475,807
DU and Flow
Land Use Flow Generation 1,000 SF/ Generation/
(GPAPD)Ili Acre RIDU&1,000
SF
Residential
Single Family 2,800 5.00 560
Multi-famil 4,800 15.00 320
Non-Residential
Commercial 2,500 21.78 115
Office 3,500 21.78 161
Industrial 2,000 21.78 92
GPAPD=Gallons per acre per day
GPAPD listed based on City of Upland Water System Master Plan Update 2010 New Residential average based on midpoit of dwelling units per acre-per Upland Water system Master Plan 2010 New-residential based on Floor Area Ratio(FAR)per acre per General Plan FAR .,000 SF/Acre
Commercial 43,560 x.50=9147.6/1000=21. 0.5 21.78 Office 43,560 x.50=13,068/1000=13.07 0.5 21.78 Industrial 43,560 x.50/1000=10.89 0.5 21.78
ater Generation Expected
Rate Water Units/Sq. FEE SCHEDULE Revenue
Land Use (gal/day per volume Ft (per sq.ftJ from New 000 square feet) 1,000 sq.ft.) Developme
nt
15,208,348 $0.86 $5,011,876
•
L 884,282 580,884 $428 MIMI
• EMEINIONEIDEMIEZMIE t r
484,259 404,482
Total $5,533,150
Land Use FEE SCHEDULE
Single-Family Detached $0.86
$0.86
MESEIMIZEr
WEETatEra
(2.0%Administration Costs included)
Land Use Calculated Fees
Single Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.87
Multi-Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.87
Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $436
Office (Per 1,000 SF) $611
Industrial (Per 1,000) $349
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
SEWER FEE CALCULATION
Existing Future
Sewer Expected
Dwelling Sewer FEE
Generation Rate Density(DU Dwelling Density(DU Sewer Volume Total sewer Revenue from Land Use SCHEDULE
(gal/day per Units per Acre) Volume Units(DU) per Acre) (gaUday) volume New DU) (DU) (gal/day) (per DU) Development Residential
Residential 241 29,248 - 7,048,768 2,837 - 683,746 7,732,514 $93.13 $264,212 Total Residential I 29,248 - 7,048,768 2,837 - 683,746 7,732,514 $264,212 Sewer FEE Expected
Generation Rate Floor Sewer
Floor Area Floor Area Floor Area Sewer Volume Total sewer SCHEDULE Revenue from Land Use (gaUday per Area (square feet) Volume Ratio (square feet) (gal/day) volume (per 1,000 New 1,000 square Ratio (gal/day)
feet) square ft.) Development
Non-Residential
Commercial 68.9 0.3S 7,112,985 489,875 0.35 590,884 40,694 530,569 26.61 $15,725 Office 68.9 0.40 2,614,538 180,065 0.40 217,193 14,958 195,023 26.61 $5,780 Industrial 68.9 0.40 4,869,099 335,337 0.40 404,482 27,857 363,194 26.61 $10,764 Total Non-Residential 14,596,622 1,005,277 1,212,08 83,510 1,088,787 $32,270 TOTALS 8,054,045 767,256 8,821,301 $296,482 Total Sewer Improvement Cost $3,970,000 Funded From Other Sources: $3,112,232 Offsetting Revenue $561,286
Adjusted Sewer Improvement Cost $3,408,714
Cost per 1,000 gaUday volume $386 New Development 91.30% $3,112,232 Total Cost Per EDU $0.39 Existing Development 8.70% $296,482 $3,408,714
DU and Flow
Land Use Flow Generation 1,000 SF/ Generation/
(GPAPD)[1] Acre[2] DU&1,000
SF
Residential
Single Family 270 270
Multi-famil 190 190
Non-Residential
Commercial 1,500 21.78 69
Industrial 1,500 21.78 69
Office 1,500 21.78 69
New Residential average based on midpoit of dwelling units per acre-per Upland Water system Master Plan 2010 New-residential based on Floor Area Ratio(FAR)per acre per General Plan FAR 1,000 SF/Acre
Commercial 43,560 x.50=9147.6/1000=21.78 0.5 21.78 Office 43,560 x.50=13,068/1000=13.07 0.5 21.78
Industrial 43,560 x.50/1000=10.89 0.5 21.78
Sewer FEE
Generation Rate Total Expected
Land Use (gal/day per sewer SCHEDULE Revenue I1,000 square volume (per Sq.Ft./ from New
feet) 1,000 Sq.Ft.) lopment
i■
241.00 ESEMIZEIMIE= $285,298
530,589®®
e• - 68.87 MEMEI® $5,780
MEMZIMEMMEMI
Total $327,568
IrlEEZEI
Single-Family $0.05
Multi-Family $0.05
Commercial $27
Office $27
Industrial $27
(2.0%Administration Costs included)
Land Use Calculated Fees
Single Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.05
Multi-Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.05
Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $27.15
Office (Per 1,000 SF) $27.15
Industrial (Per 1,000) $27.15
APPENDIX A-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN FEE CALCULATION
Existing EDU Calculation
Service Factor(Residents and Employees)
Residents per Unit/
umber of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Us rsons Served 1,000 Non-Res.SF Der 1,000 Non-Res.SI Non-Res.SF Number of EDUs Residential 78,285 2.68 1.00 29,248 29,248 Commercial 7,702 1.08 0.40 7,112,985 2,877 Office 4,386 1.68 0.63 2,614,538 1,639 Industrial 2,705 0.56 0.21 4,869,099 1,010 Total 93,077 34,774
Future EDU Calculation
Service Factor(Future Residents and Employees)
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type ersons Served 1,000 Non-Res.SF 3er 1,000 Non-Res.Si Non-Res.SF Number of EDUs Residential 7,594 2.68 1.00 2,837 2,837 Commercial 640 1.08 0.40 590,884 239 Office 364 1.68 0.63 217,193 136
Industrial 225 0.56 0.21 404,482 84 Total 8,823 3,296
Existing Units/SO ft. Units per Acre/FAR Developed Acreage Residential 29,248 6.8273 4,284
Commercial 7,112,985 0.5 327
Office 2,614,538 0.5 120
Industrial 4,869,099 0.5 224
I Run off Rate Coeffificiant Calculation
Runoff Rate Current
Land Use Category Coefficient"C" Developed Acreage Total Unit Runoff 4,284 IIMI
® r
•• r•- 0.90 108
0.85 311
4,954
Build out thru 2040 Units/SO ft. Units per Acre/FAR Developed Acreage Residential 2,837 6.8273 416
Commercial 590,884 0.5 27
Office 217,193 0.5 10
Industrial 404,482 0.5 19
I Run off Rate Coeffificiant Calculation
Runoff Rate Future
Land Use Category Coefficient"C" Developed Acreage Total Unit Runoff M
1::IlEtl: - 0.90
0.85 471 267
II Proposed Facilities
New Development
Facility Facility Costs
Storm Drain Facilities City $ 75,563,793
Offsettin•Revenues 1,639,563
Total $ 73,924,230
Overall
Cost Per Unit Runoff Cost Per Net Acre
Cost Per unit Run off $276,917 $156,876
Cost Per Unit Runoff
Runoff Rate Allocation Rate
Land Use Category Coefficient°C per Acre Cost Financed - - $144,218 $59,930,631
IHMEMI :XlMZEIM $7,137,018
• - 0.90 fflMEN $2,485,300
0.85 MZEIM $4,371,282
$73,924,230
Allocation by
Land Use Category Total Unit Runoff(EBUs Percentage New Development Costs Existing Development 2,839 91.41% $67,571,333 New Development 267 8.59% $6,352,897
Total 3,106 100.00% $73,924,230
Cost per Unit of Runoff $23,798
Number of Units/
Land Use Category Per SF/per 1,000 Developed Sq.Ft. New Development Residential $0.88 2,837 $5,150,316
Commercial $1,038 590,884 $613,341
Office $983 217,193 $213,582
Industrial $929 404,482 $375,659
$6,352,897
Fee Schedule(2.0%Administration Costs included)
Land Use Calculated Fees
Single Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.90
Multi-Family (Per Sq.ft.) $0.90
Commercial (Per 1,000 SF) $1,059
Office (Per 1,000 SF) $1,003
Industrial (Per 1,000) $947
APPENDIX B
City of Upland
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
INVENTORY AND
FACILITIES NEEDS
LIST
APPENDIX B-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
GENERAL FACILITIES FACILITIES INVENTORY
Buildings Address (Sq.Ft.) Cost/Sq.Ft. Value City Hall 460 N Euclid Ave. 22,280 $650 $14,482,000 Storage Building(Haz-Material) 1370 N Benson Ave 238 $335 $79,730 Public Works Office 1370 N Benson Ave 10,664 $627 $6,686,328 Public Works Garage#1 1371 N Benson Ave 2,599 $335 $870,665 Public Works Garage#2 1372 N Benson Ave 3,816 $335 $1,278,360 Shop Building 1373 N Benson Ave 13,692 $335 $4,586,820 Library 450 N Euclid Ave 16,105 $627 $10,097,835 Carnegie Library 123 E"D"St 5,442 $627 $3,412,134 Total 74,836 $41,493,872
Land (Acres) Cost/Acre Value
City Hall 460 N Euclid Ave. 2.81 $1,097,268 $3,083,323 Storage Building(Haz-Material) 1370 N Benson Ave 6.79 $1,097,268 $7,450,449 Public Works Office 1370 N Benson Ave 6.46 $1,097,268 $7,088,351 Public Works Garage#1 1371 N Benson Ave 0.00 $1,097,268 $0 Public Works Garage#2 1372 N Benson Ave 0.00 $1,097,268 $0 Shop Building 1373 N Benson Ave 0.00 $1,097,268 $0 Library 450 N Euclid 0.50 $1,097,268 $548,634 Carnegie Library 123 E"D"St 0.50 $1,097,268 $548,634 Total 17.06 $1,097,267.91 18,719,391
Equipment Square Feet Cost per Sq.Ft Value Public Facilities 58,731 100 $5,873,100 Library Facilities 16,105 100 $1,610,500 Total $7,483,600
Vehicles Vehicle ID Type Make Make Year Cost Pick-Up Trucks 290 Animal Control Ford F-250 S.D. 2003 $17,987 Van 292 Animal Control Gmc Savana 2500 2008 $44,261 Van 293 Animal Control Ford 250 Mr Cargo Van 2018 $61,081 Van 294 Animal Control Ford 250 Mr Cargo Van 2020 $69,848 SUV 390 Building&Safety Toyot Rav4 Hybrid 2020 $32,681 SUV 391 Building&Safety Toyot Rav4 Hybrid 2020 $32,681 SUV 392 Building&Safety Toyot Rav4 Hybrid 2020 $32,681 Pick-Up Trucks 51 City Hall Chevy C-1500 1991 $13,388 Automobile 25 Customer service Honda Civic-Hybrid 2005 $21,556 Pick-Up Trucks 26 Customer service Chevrolet Colorado 2021 $26,137 SUV 56 Housing Ford Escape 2008 $24,998 SUV 79 IT Services Ford Escape/Hybri 2008 $24,998 SUV 130 Dmeless Coordinat Chevrolet Tahoe 2021 $38,008 Pick-Up Trucks 12 IT Services Chevy Colorado 2018 $28,340 $468,646
APPENDIX B-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
POLICE FACILITIES INVENTORY
Buildings Address (Sq.Ft.) Unit Cost/Sq.Ft. Value Police Headquarters 1499 W 13th St 30,010 $658 $19,746,580 Police Storage Building 1499 W 13th St 1,954 $335 $654,590 Animal Shelter 1275 E San Bernardino 10,000 $450 $4,500,000 41,964 $24,901,170
Land (Acres) Unit Cost/Acre Value
Police Headquarters 1499 W 13th St 4.80 $1,097,268 $5,266,886 Police Storage Building 1499 W 13th St 0.00 $0 $0 Animal Shelter 1275 E San Bernardino 1.00 $1,097,268 $1,097,268
5.80 $1,097,268 $6,364,154
1 Vehicles Existing/Proposed Unit# Make/Model Year Cost Traffic Sedan Existing 001(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CROWN VICTOR 2006 $45,800 Traffic Truck Existing 061(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint F-150 2003 $13,596 Truck Code Enforcement Existing 092(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint C-1500 EX/CB 2005 $43,500 SUV Detective Existing 120(SW)Fleet Maint DURANGO 2019 $43,500 SUV Detective Existing 121(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint TACOMA SR5 2020 $43,500 Sedan Detective Existing 122(Automobile)Fleet Maint CAMARY HYBRID 2020 $43,500 SUV Admin Existing 123(SUV)Fleet Maint DURANGO 2020 $43,500 SUV Homeless Coordinatc Existing 130(SUV)Fleet Maint TAHOE 2021 $67,000 Truck Code Enforcement Existing 150(Pick-Up Trucks(Fleet Maint COLORADO 2WD EXT CAB 2020 $45,800 Truck Code Enforcement Existing 151(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint COLORADO 2020 $45,800 Truck Code Enforcement Existing 152(Pick-Up Trucks(Fleet Maint COLORADO 2020 $45,800 Truck PST Existing 153(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint COLORADO 2022 $41,000 Truck PST Existing 154(Pick-Up Trucks(Fleet Maint COLORADO 2022 $41,000 SUV PST Existing 180(SUV)Fleet Maint RAV4 HYBRID 2020 $41,000 SUV PST Existing 181(SUV)Fleet Maint RAV4 HYBRID 2017 $41,000 Truck CERT Existing 183(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint DODGE RAM 2500 2011 $67,000 SUV Evidence Existing 189(SW)Fleet Maint TAHOE LS 2WD 2003 $67,000 Trailer Traffic Existing 2001T(Trailers)Fleet Maint ELITE II 102 X 20 2018 $19,000 Trailer Traffic Existing 2002T(Traffic Controller)Fleet Ma MC360 2020 $15,805 Trailer Traffic Existing 2003T(Traffic Controller)Fleet Ma MC360 2020 $15,805 Police Patrol Car Existing 201(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER PURSUIT 2021 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 202(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2017 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 203(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER PURSUIT 2017 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 204(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint TAHOE 2020 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 205(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER PURSUIT 2021 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 206*21(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2021 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 207(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2019 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 208(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2017 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 209(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER PURSUIT 2017 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 210(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint TAHOE 2020 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 211(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2017 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 212 (Police Patrol)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2019 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 213(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint TAHOE 2020 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 214(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2017 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 215(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2019 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 216(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2014 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 217(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2019 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 218(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2014 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 219(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2021 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 220(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint TAHOE 2020 $69,500 Police Patrol Car Existing 221(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2019 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 222(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint TAHOE 2015 $69,500 Police Patrol Car Existing 223(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2015 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Existing 224(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2017 $45,800 Police Motorcycle Existing 231(Police Motorcycle)Fleet Main R1200RTP 2018 $27,480 Police Motorcycle Existing 234(Police Motorcycle)Fleet Main ST1300PA 2012 $27,480 Police Motorcycle Existing 235(Police Motorcycle)Fleet Main R1200RTP 2018 $27,480 Police Motorcycle Existing 237(Police Motorcycle)Fleet Main R1200RTP 2018 $27,480 Sedan Detective Existing 247(Automobile)Fleet Maint CHARGER 2017 $43,800 SUV Detective Existing 248(SW)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2017 $43,800 SUV Detective Existing 249(SW)Fleet Maint EXPLORER INTERCEPTOR 2017 $43,800 Police Patrol Truck Existing 250(Police Patrol)Fleet Maint RAM 2500 CREW CAB 2019 $67,000 Police Patrol Jailer Vehicle Existing 251(Van)Fleet Maint EXPRESS VAN 3500 2020 $50,000 Sedan Admin Existing 254(Automobile)Fleet Maint CROWN VIC 2004 $43,800 Truck Admin Existing 255(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint DODGE RAM 1500 2011 $67,000 Sedan Detective Existing 256(Automobile)Fleet Maint FUSION 2014 $43,500 Sedan Admin Existing 258(SW)Fleet Maint ESCAPE 2009 $43,500 Sedan Admin Existing 260(Automobile)Fleet Maint CROWN VIC 2002 $43,500 Sedan Detective Existing 261(Automobile)Fleet Maint ACCORD HYBRID 2015 $43,500 Police Admin Existing 262(Automobile)Fleet Maint CROWN VICTOR 2003 $43,500 Sedan Detective Existing 263(Automobile)Fleet Maint ACCORD-EX 2012 $43,500 Sedan Detective Existing 264(Automobile)Fleet Maint CAMARY HYBRID 2015 $43,500 Sedan Admin Existing 268(Automobile)Fleet Maint CROWN VICTOR 2003 $43,500 Sedan Detective Existing 270(Automobile)Fleet Maint CAMRY 2007 $43,500 SUV Admin Existing 272(SUV)Fleet Maint ESCAPE 2009 $43,500 SUV Admin Existing 273(SW)Fleet Maint HIGHLANDER 2016 $43,500 Trailer CERT Existing 275(Trailers(Fleet Maint UTILITY 2004 $22,500 SUV Traffic Existing 278(SUV)Fleet Maint RAV4 HYBRID 2017 $43,500 Van Detective Existing 283(Van)Fleet Maint ODYSEEY 2011 $43,500 Sedan Detective Existing 288(Automobile)Fleet Maint CAMARY HYBRID 2015 $43,500 Truck Detective Existing 289(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint DODGE RAM 1500 2011 $43,500 Truck Animal Control Existing 290(Pick-Up Trucks)Fleet Maint F-250 S.D. 2003 $43,500
Van Animal Control Existing 292(Van)Fleet Maint SAVANA 2500 2008 $43,500 Van Animal Control Existing 293(Van)Fleet Maint 250 MR CARGO VAN 2018 $43,500 Van Animal Control Existing 294(Van)Fleet Maint 250 MR CARGO VAN 2020 $43,500 Trailer CERT Existing 504(Trailers)Fleet Maint ELITE II 2013 $15,000 Police Patrol Car Planned CHARGER 2022 $45,800 Police Patrol Car Planned CHARGER 2022 $45,800 Sedan Detective Planned Durango 2022 $43,500 Sedan Detective Planned Durango 2022 $43,500 Sedan Detective Planned Tahoe 2022 $47,500 Sedan Detective Planned Explorer 2022 $43,500 Rescue Vehicle Planned LEINCO 2021 $180,000 83 $3,759,226
Equipment Year Acquired Inventory Cost
Safety Equipment 2004 1 $6,600
Radio,Portable,Group 2001 1 $78,000
Radio,Portable,Group 1998 1 $11,000
Phone Switch 2002 1 $42,300
Computer Server 1998 1 $1,100
Computer Server 1998 1 $1,100
Voice Processor Recorder 1997 1 $13,900
Voice Processor Recorder 1997 1 $13,900
Fingerprint System 2001 1 $28,300
Computer Equipment 2004 1 $4,200
Conversion Parts 2005 1 $5,600
Forensic Mapping System 2004 1 $14,200
Lexar JD256mb USB Flash 2004 1 $1,500
Office Furniture 2004 1 $4,400
Air Handler 2004 1 $4,100
Office Furniture 2005 1 $47,300
48 Channel Logging Recoi 2004 1 $7,500
48 Channel Logging Recoi 2004 1 $7,500
48 Channel Logging Recoi 2005 1 $7,700
911 Dispatch Consoles 2005 5 $44,700
911 Setup and MTC 2005 1 $81,600
911 Setup and MTC 2005 1 $6,200
CAD Computer Interface f 2005 1 $6,400
Wiring of 911 Dispatch Col 2005 1 $4,500 GST MPR?TRRR S/W SVCBI 2005 1 $54,100
Wireless Modern 2002 1 $13,600
Computer File Server 2002 1 $3,400
Message Switch 2003 1 $35,300
Crime Scene Tracking Soft 2003 1 $79,300
Voicemail Hardware 2004 1 $7,500
Evidence Tracking Softwai 2003 1 $7,900
Computer Aided Dispatch/Records Management System $2,500,000 Document Imaging System $450,000
Computers $1,000,000
Radios $1,500,000
Radio System $1,500,000
Camera-Canon EOS 90D 2021 1 $1,600
Camera-Canon EOS7d 2009 1 $1,700
Air Science Drying Cabine 2018 1 $4,000
EV!-PAD Laser Trajectory 2021 2 $577
Air Science DWS 2008 1 $2,000
911 Setup and MTC 2005 1 $211,815
911 Setup and MTC 2005 1 $5,112
Server DC 2017 1 $9,000
Server 1 2017 6 $96,000
Storage Server 2017 1 $38,000
Plant CAD Server 2015 1 $5,000
Backup Server 2020 1 $50,000
Firewall 2018 1 $4,500
Firewall licenses 2018 1 $13,000
Email licenses 2020 1 $90,000
Switches 2011 1 $20,000
Voice Recorder
Phone System 2017 1 $5,000
Voicemail Server 2018 1 $5,000
LPR Systems 2021 1 $785,000
Metrolink➢arking lot 2021 1 $5,000
Wireless Access Points
Phone and intemet connections
UPS 2021 1 $50,000
911 Vesta Systems
Deskphones 2021 1 $12,000
Cell phones 2021 1 $120,000
Cell phones monthly cost 2021 1 $5,000
!PADS 2021 1 $20,000
!pad monthly cost 2021 1 $1,000
Mobile Laptops 2021 33 $132,000
Desktops 2021 50 $55,000
Laptops 2021 10 $10,000
Malware protection 2021 1 $14,000
Air conditioners
Surveillence Cameras 2021 1 $120,000
Surveillence Storage serve 2022 1 $25,000 Surveillence additional stc 2022 1 $28,000 Body Camera 2022 1 $240,000
Storage Server Extension 2017 1 $9,000
$9,788,004
APPENDIX B-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
PARKS FACILTIES LIST
Buildings Address (Sq.Ft.) Unit Cost/Sq.Ft. Value Senior Center 250 N 3rd Ave 9,859 $453 $4,466,127 Magnolia Park Recreation Building 651 W 15th St. 4,960 $453 $2,246,880 Landecena Building Recreation Center 1325 San Bernardino Blvd. 5,084 $453 $2,303,052 Total 19,903 $9,016,059
Land for Sports Park Address (Acres) Unit Cost/Acre Value Baldy View Dog Park W 11th St 4.91 $1,097,268 $5,387,585 Cabrillo Park 1465 W 11th St 19.69 $1,097,268 $21,605,205 Citrus Park 8th Street 5.88 $1,097,268 $6,451,935 Fern Reservoir Park 9th Street 0.9 $1,097,268 $987,541 Greenbelt Park 1500 W 15th St 14.91 $1,097,268 $16,360,265 Magnolia Park 651 W.15th St. 1.97 $1,097,268 $2,161,618 McCarthy Park 2000 N.San Antonio 5.22 $1,097,268 $5,727,738 Memorial Park 1100 E Foothil Blvd. 46.96 $1,097,268 $51,527,701 Olivedale Park 500 E 8th St. 6.37 $1,097,268 $6,989,597 San Antonio Park 2393 N Mountain 14.4 $1,097,268 $15,800,658 Sierra Vista Park 430 E 15th St. 6.85 $1,097,268 $7,516,285 8th Street Reservoir Park 8th St.and Campus Ave. 5.2 $1,097,268 $5,705,793 13th Street Reservoir Park 13th Street and Campus Ave. 2.20 $1,097,268 $2,413,989 Total 135.46 $148,635,911
Vehicles ID Number Type Make Model Year Cost Pick-Up Trucks 37 Park Maint Ford F150 2015 $26,012 Pick-Up Trucks 47 Park Maint Ford F-350 Supcab 2008 $29,985 Towed Equipment 359 Park Maint Kbar 157595AH 2015 $7,400 Trailers 5001T Park Maint Big Tex 90sr-12bk7sir 2020 $6,865 Dump Trucks 506 Park Maint Chevy C 3500 2017 $51,152 Pick-Up Trucks 700 Park Maint Dodge Ram Crew 1500 2019 $32,402 Traffic Controller 7004T Parkway Maint Solar Tech.Inc Silent Messenger II 2019 $16,700 Traffic Controller 7005T Parkway Maint Solar Tech.Inc Silent Messenger II 2020 $16,700 Traffic Controller 7006T Parkway Maint Solar Tech.Inc Silent Messenger II 2020 $16,700 Traffic Controller 7007T Parkway Maint Solar Tech.Inc Silent Messenger II 2020 $16,700 Traffic Controller 7008T Parkway Maint Solar Tech.Inc Silent Messenger II 2020 $16,700 Traffic Controller 7009T Parkway Maint Solar Tech.Inc Silent Messenger II 2020 $16,700 SUV 8 Recreation Admin Chevy S-10 Blazer 2003 $20,317 Van 40 Recreation Admin Gmc Savana 2500 2017 $27,979 Pick-Up Trucks 41 Recreation Admin Chevrolet Colorado 2020 $28,154 SUV 85 Recreation Admin Ford Escape/Hybri 2005 $16,806 Total 16 $347,272
Mis Property/Structures/Equipment
Picnic Tables
Playground
Park Restroom
BBQ
Basketball Court
Concession Stand
Soccer Field House/Restroom
Soccer Field
Park Restroom
Park Press Box/Concession
Playground
Park Press/Concession Stand
Ballfields
Basketball Courts
Fitness Trail
Horseshoes
Picnic Shelters
Park Concession Stand
Skate Park
Comminity Building
Amphitheater
Basketball Courts
Park Press Box/Concession Stand
Snack Bar
Park Press Box
$9,712,400
APPENDIX B-1
UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
Project Type Agency Total Cost Basis In Montclair on I-10 at Monte Vista Interchange SANBAG $2,107,922 SANBAG Mitigation Study In Ontario on I-10 at 4th St/Grove Ave Interchange SANBAG $505,321 SANBAG Mitigation Study In Ontario on I-10 at Euclid Interchange SANBAG $936,886 SANBAG Mitigation Study Widen Arrow from County Line to Central-2 to 4 Lanes Regional Arterials $2,258,000 SANBAG Mitigation Study Traffic Signal Equipment Replacement and UPS Installation Planned City $4,000,000 Sunbtotal $9,808,129
Offsetting Revenue $448,794
$9,359,335
APPENDIX B-1
UPLAND,CAUFORNIA
WATER FACIUTIES
Project Type_ Near_Tenn Mid Term Ultimate Total 9th Street Water Improvements(Benson Ave.to Mountain Ave.) Capacity Improvements $500,000 $500,000 14th Street Water Improvements(Campus to Grove) Capacity Improvements $500,000 $500,000 17th Street Water Main(San Antonio Ave.to Euclid Ave.) Capacity Improvements $500,000 $500,000 19th Street Water Improvements(Mountain Ave.to Euclid Ave.) Capacity Improvements $800,000 $800,000 Alpine/Vernon/Palm Ave.Water Mains Capacity Improvements $1,600,000 $1,600,000 Arrow Highway Water Improvements Water Reliability $800,000 $800,000 Campus Avenue Water Main Capacity Improvements $1,400,000 $1,400,000 Foothill Blvd.Water Main(Mountain to San Antonio) Capacity Improvements $750,000 $750,000 Generator at Plant 2(24th St.) Water Reliability $260,000 $260,000 Generator at Plant 6(15th St.) Water Reliability $787,890 $787,890 Grove Avenue Water Main(Foothill Blvd.to 15th St.) Capacity Improvements $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Huntignton Drive Water Main(Benson Ave.to West End) Capacity Improvements $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Mulberry Ave.Water Main(Foothill Blvd.to 13th St.) Capacity Improvements $450,000 $450,000 Reservoir 16 Improvements Capacity Improvements $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Other Reservoir Improvements Capacity Improvements $20,000,000 $20,000,000 Generators for back-up power supply Water Reliability $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,500,000 Water Main Improvements Capacity Improvements $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 (Add Planned Projects]
Res.2 Evaluation,Air Gaps,Roof Vents,In-Tank Mixer System (Mountain Reservoir Projects $400,000 Lane s/o San Antonio Dam)
Res.3&7 Evaluation.Air Gaos.Roof Vents(1090 W.22nd Street) Reservoir Projects $450,000 Res.4 Evaluation.New Roof and Hatches(159 N.6th Avenue) Reservoir Projects $275,000 Res.9 Seismic Evaluation(467 S.Campus Avenue) Reservoir Projects $100,000 Res.10 Evaluation,Air Gaps,Roof Vents,In-Tank Mixer System(1335 N. Reservoir Projects $400,000 Benson Ave.)
Res.12&12A Evaluation.Air Gaps.Roof Vents(580 E.15th Street) Reservoir Projects $475,000 Res.13&13A Evaluation.Air Gaps.Roof Vents(401 E.19th Street) Reservoir Projects $475,000 Res.14 Evaluation.Air Gaps.Roof Vents(1505 E.16th St.) Reservoir Projects $400,000 Res.16 Evaluation,Structural Repairs,Air Gaps,Roof Vents(1285 W.24th Reservoir Projects $3,500,000 Street)
Chino Basin Water Treatment Plant(1258 W.9th St.) Treatment Plan Projects $2.925.000 Plant 4 CMU Building for Ex.Chlorine Gneration,Pump to waste discharge $700,000 Pipe(300 LF),New Chain Link Fence&Gates,Equipment,and Site clean- Treatment Plan Projects uo(401 E.19th Street)
Plant 5 Vehicular Gates Replacement,SCADA Antena Replacement,and Treatment Plan Projects $200,000 Eauioment(1505 E.16th Street)
Plant 6 Chlorine Generation,CMU Buildings,Drainage Pipe and $600,000 Undersidewalk Box Culvert at South End,Plug Valve for Pump Station By- Treatment Plan Projects pass,New Chain Link Fence with 1"mesh,and Equipment(580 E.15th Street)
Plant 10 New CMU Building with Removable Roof,Chain Link Fencing with $550,000 1"mesh,Waste to Drain Pipe to Benson Avenue,Well Rehab,and Treatment Plan Projects Eauioment(250 N.Benson Avenue)
Plant 11 New Roof,Security Doors&Windows,Chain Link Fencing with 1" Treatment Plan Projects $400,000 mesh.and Eauioment(149 N.Benson Avenue)
Plant 13 Chlorine Generation,Install AC in Ex.Building,Replace severed Treatment Plan Projects $450,000 sewer line.and Eauioment(159 N.6th Avenue)
Plant 14 Evaluate connection with City of Ontario,New Roof for Building, Treatment Plan Projects $200,000 New Chain Link Fence&Gate.and Eauioment(467 S.Campus Avenue) 9th Street.from Benson Ave.to Mountain Ave. Pipeline Projects $500.000 9th Street.from 8th Ave.to Grove Ave. Pipeline Projects $2.500.000 Total Planned Facilties $9,547,890 $12,200,000 $26,500,000 $63,747,890 Offsetting Revenue $272,083
Total $63,475,807
APPENDIX B-1
UPLAND, CA
SEWER FACILITIES
Planned Facilities
Project Type Total Cost
Landfill Flare Modifications State Mandate for extraction and $445,000 control of methane gas generated
by landfill debris.
Richland Street Trunk Main Repair Sewer Reliability $75,000 Manhole Adjustments to Grade for City/County Sewer Reliability $150,000 Shared Roadway Project
Citywide Sewer Rehab 2021/2022 Sewer Reliability $400,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2022/2023 Sewer Reliability $500,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2023/2024 Sewer Reliability $300,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2024/2025 Sewer Reliability $300,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2025/2026 Sewer Reliability $300,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2026/2027 Sewer Reliability $300,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2027/2028 Sewer Reliability $300,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2028/2029 Sewer Reliability $300,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2029/2030 Sewer Reliability $300,000 Citywide Sewer Rehab 2030/2031 Sewer Reliability $300,000 Total Subtotal Total $3,970,000
Offsetting Revenue $561,286 '
Total $3,408,714
APPENDIX B-1
UPLAND, CA
STORM DRAIN FACILITIES
Storm Drain
Current Status
Projects Planned 2006 Status Remove/Still Planned CCI Adjusted Cost MN 1-5+B22:H62B22:G62 Planned $1,184,374 WS A-02: Campus Ave(Arrow to Foothill) Planned In Design $2,089,097 WS A-02: Foothill Blvd.segment(Campus to Euclid) Planned Still Planned $5,833,139 WS A-02: Euclid Ave segment(Foothill to 18th St) Planned Still Planned $4,202,889 WS A-02: 11 laterals Planned Still Planned $7,565,043 WS A-03: Euclid Ave(SRPP to Foothill Blvd) Planned I Still Planned $2,613,482 WS A-03: San Antonio Ave(13th St to 18th St) Planned Still Planned $2,863,728 WS A-03: 11 laterals Planned Still Planned $5,761,705 WS A-04: Foothill Blvd.(San Antonio to Mountain) Planned Still Planned $4,851,987 WS A-04: 12 laterals Planned Still Planned $3,310,146 WS A-04: Mountain Ave(Foothill to 18th St.) Planned Still Planned $4,613,345 WS B: West Cucamonga Tributary drains Planned Still Planned $13,194,479 WU A2: 1th Street,from Benson to Cabrillo Park Planned Still Planned $1,166,985 WU A3: Greenbelt Park Aviation corridor drain _ Planned Still Planned $2,283,403 WU A3-1: 14th Street alignment City Yard drain Planned i Still Planned $390,615 WU B-1: Foothill Blvd.(Benson Ave.west) Planned Still Planned $605,981 WU B-2: Foothill Blvd.(Benson Ave.east) Planned Still Planned $452,939 WU B-3: 13th Street(Benson Ave.west) Planned Still Planned $488,524 WU B-4: 13th Street(Benson Ave.east) Planned Still Planned $745,684 WU D: Benson Ave(9th St.to 7th St.)connecting to Montclair system Planned Still Planned $2,403,005 WU D-1: 7th Street(Benson Ave east) Planned _ Still Planned $1,429,813 WU D-2: 8th Street(Benson Ave east) Planned Still Planned $821,795 WU D-3: ATSF RR(Benson Ave east) Planned Still Planned $937,039 WU H: 16th Street(Wilson Ave to Benson to Holliday Pit) Planned Still Planned $2,530,813 WU H-1: Northerly lateral along Benson Avenue(16th St north) Planned I Still Planned $1,199,127 WU H-2: Easterly lateral along 16th St(Benson Ave east) Planned Still Planned $524,655 Arrow Hwy Storm Drain(Benson to Fairwood) $1,500,000 $44,183,476 $75,563,793
Offsetting Revenues $1,639,563
Total $73,924,230
APPENDIX C
City of Upland
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
PROPERTY
INVENTORY FOR
LAND ACQUISITION
COSTS
APPENDIX C-1
CITY OF UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
LAND INVENTORY
Address/Location Property Location County Proposed Use Sale Month Sale Year Acres Total Price Price/Acre 950 Monte Vista Ave Upland San Bernardino Commercial June 2020 1.54 $920,000 $597,403 1701 W 11th St. Upland San Bernardino Industrial July 2015 3.83 $1,680,000 $438,642 2068 W 11th St Upland San Bernardino Industrial February 2020 4.87 $5,825,000 $1,196,099 1231 E 16th St Upland San Bernardino Commercial June 2017 8.48 $7,450,000 $878,538 1155 20th St Upland San Bernardino Commercial June 2016 10.16 $3,500,000 $344,488 1254 Airport Drive Upland San Bernardino Industrial October 2018 1.18 $750,000 $635,593 N Campus Upland San Bernardino Commercial October 2016 2.00 $3,500,000 $1,750,000 365 N Central Upland San Bernardino Commercial September 2016 1.16 $640,000 $551,724 1549 W Foothill Blvd Upland San Bernardino Commercial January 2019 2.55 $3,300,000 $1,294,118 1780 W Foothill Upland San Bernardino Commercial August 2021 6.3 $7,800,000 $1,238,095 1910 Huntington DR Upland San Bernardino Industrial November 2021 1.38 $2,425,000 $1,757,246 210 b Campus Upland San Bernardino Commercial August 2021 3.06 $4,850,000 $1,584,967 W 11th St Upland San Bernardino Residential March 2020 4.75 $2,705,738 $569,629 1525 W 15th St. Upland San Bernardino Residential July 2016 4.75 $4,000,000 $842,105 1130-1160 E 19th St Upland San Bernardino Residential April 2019 4.5 $11,100,000 $2,466,667 Baseland Rd Upland San Bernardino Residential December 2019 15.84 $21,838,000 $1,378,662 Campus b Colonies Pkwy Upland San Bernardino Commercial March 2018 3.05 $5,050,000 $1,655,738 2138 W Foothill Upland San Bernardino Residential March 2020 1.49 $850,952 $571,109 Average $1,097,268
www.FinanceDTA.com
18201 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 220
IRVINE, CA 92612
PHONE: (800) 969-4DTA
Public Finance
Public-Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
UPLAND, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN UPDATE OF THE
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
AND QUIMBY FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, on September 26, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5792 establishing a schedule of fees and charges for Development Impact Fees (DIF) to be collected at the time of permit issuance; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the DIF is to ensure that new development pays its fair share of the new facilities and infrastructure necessary to accommodate impacts resulting from that new development through 2040; and WHEREAS, the Upland Municipal Code Chapter 15 Section 109.1.1 provides that the amount of the DIF shall be adopted by resolution; and WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code sections 66000 - 66025) requires that for a local government to increase the DIF, they must establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the specific amount of the fee imposed as a condition of approval and the cost of the public facility attributable to that project; and
WHEREAS, the City has engaged DTA to conduct a Public Facilities Fee Study Update (Nexus Study) to meet the requirement of the Mitigation Fee Act; and WHEREAS, based upon the Nexus Study, it is recommended that the DIF Schedule is updated as set forth in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City Council approve an annual DIF adjustment based on the California Construction Cost Index (CCCI); and WHEREAS, based on the Quimby In-Lieu Fee Program Study, it is recommended that the City Council approve the Quimby Fees as set forth in Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed for the City Council meeting of October 28, 2024, by publishing the notice in an adjudicated newspaper of general circulation, posting on the City's website, and mailing to interested parties on September 27, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Upland hereby finds, determines and resolves, as follows:
Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The DIF Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby adopted.
Section 3. The DIF Schedule shall be updated on an annual basis based on
Resolution No.
the CCCI and the change in the index will be evaluated on a September-to- September basis.
Section 4. The Quimby In-Lieu Fee, attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby adopted.
Section 5. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds that this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
Further, if the activity is deemed a project this City Council finds that this Resolution is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Section 6. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.
Section 8. Effective Date. The fees adopted by this Resolution shall become effective on January 1, 2025.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 2024.
Bill Velto, Mayor
Resolution No.
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 28th day of October, 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
ATTEST:
Keri Johnson, City Clerk
Resolution No.
Exhibit A
Development Impact Fees
Effective January 1, 2025
Land Use Residential per Square Foot Non-Residential per 1,000 Square Foot Single Family Multi-Family Commercial Office Industrial General Facilities $0.78 $0.78 $1,305 $2,022 $669 Police $0.43 $0.43 $721 $1,118 $370 Parks — $4.80 $4.80 _ N/A — N/A N/A Transportation — $0.07 $0.07 $494 — $296 $89 Water $0.87 $0.87 $436 — $611 $349 Sewer $0.05 $0.05 $27 — $27 $27 Storm Drain $0.90 $0.90 $1,059 $1,003 $947
Resolution No.
Exhibit B
Quimby Fees
Effective January 1, 2025
Land Use ppI Acres per 1,000 Cost per Acre In-Lieu Fee Residents
Single Family Residence 2.91 3.0 $1,097,267 $9,580 Multi-Family Residence 2.72 3.0 $1,097,267 $8,946
www.FinanceDTA.com
PARK AND RECREATIONAL
FACILITIES
QUIMBY IN-LIEU FEE
PROGRAM
CITY OF UPLAND
October 28, 2024
Public Finance
Public-Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
Newport Beach I San Jose I San Francisco I Riverside
Dallas I Houston I Raleigh I Tampa Page 199 of 222
a
18201 Von Karman Suite 220
www.FinanceDTA.com Irvine,CA 92612
CITY OF UPLAND
Al OF 11
c.) 4i.A.,C..-441.
,,-,:..c--,. \:,, .-7,g- tl
. . -v-i. - . , -.1,44_
. :it. *, -7-..- .-':=7:—.10 .
06 0 ,
PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
QUIMBY IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM
Prepared for:
City Upland
460 North Euclid
Upland, CA 91786
Attention: Stephen Parker
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
I INTRODUCTION 1
II FEE AND PARKLAND DEDICATION FORMULAS 3
INTRODUCTION
In order to adequately plan for new development and identify the public facilities and costs associated with mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA was retained by the City of Upland (the "City") to assist in the development and adoption of a Quimby Act Program ("Quimby Program"). California Government Code Section 66477 (the "Quimby Act") allows the City, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land or the payment of in-lieu fees, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition of subdivision map approval. The amount of the land to be dedicated or the fee to be imposed in lieu thereof is limited by statute and must be based upon policies and standards contained in an adopted general or specific plan. The Quimby Act allows use of in-lieu fee allows payment of a fee in lieu of land dedication. The fee is calculated to fund the acquisition of the same amount of land that would have been dedicated.
The Quimby Act under California Government Code Section 66477 California Government Code Section 66477 (the "Quimby Act") allows the City, by ordinance,to require the dedication of land or the payment of in-lieu fees, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition of subdivision map approval.
Quimby fees cannot be collected from commercial developments or apartment projects.
Subdivisions containing less than five parcels and not used for residential purposes shall be exempt from the requirements of this section. However, in that event, a condition may be placed on the approval of a parcel map that if a building permit is requested for construction of a residential structure or structures on one or more of the parcels within four years, the fee may be required to be paid by the owner of each parcel as a condition of the issuance of the permit. To ensure that such development mitigates its park's impacts, an equivalent AB 1600 fee could be collected. Revenues generated through the Quimby Act cannot be used for the operation and maintenance of park facilities. Instead, fees and donations collected from developers under the Quimby Act can be used to develop new or rehabilitate existing neighborhood or community parks and recreational facilities within the public agency.
The amount of the land to be dedicated or the fee to be imposed in lieu thereof is limited by statute and must be based on policies and standards in an adopted general or specific plan. The Quimby Act allows use of in-lieu fees to provides payment of a fee in lieu of land dedication. The fee is calculated to fund the acquisition of the same amount of land that would have been dedicated.
Section 66477(a)(2)(A) of the Government Code, however, also states that the park acreage and population figures utilized in the Quimby fee program development shall be "as of the date of the most recent available federal census". In this study, the Census base year is 2020.
The park area per 1,000 members of the city's population shall be derived from the ratio that the amount of neighborhood and community park acreage bears to the City's total population, as shown in the most recent available federal census. The amount of City of Upland October 28,2024
Park and Recreational Facilities Quimby Act Program Report Q age Ail 222
neighborhood and community park acreage shall be the actual acreage of existing neighborhood and community parks of the city, county, or local public agency as shown on its records,plans, recreational element, maps, or reports as of the date of the most recent available federal census.
The principal assumption used to determine parkland acquisition costs for a particular subdivision, and subsequent fee amounts, is that the costs depend on the fair market value of unimproved land within the subdivision, which otherwise would have been dedicated. If a subdivision meets its Quimby Program obligation through payment of an in-lieu fee, rather than dedication of land, the land value component of the fee should be equal to the market value of the unimproved land for which the fee was substituted because the land required to be dedicated would necessarily be unimproved. The following three methods can generally be used to determine the fair market value of the unimproved land within the subdivision.
Current sale prices of land within, or in the vicinity of, the subdivision; Assessed land value based on records of the County Assessor's Office; or Appraised land value based upon the determination of a qualified appraiser.
Revenues generated through the Quimby Act cannot be used to operate or maintain park facilities. Instead, fees collected from developers under the Quimby Act can be used to develop new or rehabilitate existing neighborhood or community parks and recreational facilities within the public agency.
The Quimby calculation methodology is defined by the Quimby Act and is based on:
➢ Persons per household (most recent census, in this Study 2020) ➢ Target acres / 1,000
➢ Land Valuation.
Quimby Fee Advantages
➢ Easy to update land valuation.
➢ Minimum service goal of 3 acres, regardless of actual existing acres per 1,000 ➢ residents.
➢ Staff and developer communities are already familiar with the calculation, as it is already used everywhere.
Quimby Fee Disadvantages
➢ Defined geographic nexus for spending fees.
➢ The fee is based only on land cost; the cost of developing the park facilities is not included in the calculation.
➢ Only applicable when subdivision occurs (not typically applicable to rental development)
City of Upland October 28,2024
Park and Recreational Facilities Quimby Act Program Report Q age 203 4222
II QUIMBY FEE AND PARKLAND DEDICATION FORMULAS
According to Section 66477(a)(2) of the Government Code, the amount of land to be dedicated or in-lieu fees to be imposed shall not exceed the amount necessary to provide
3.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, unless certain criteria are met. Applying the City Municipal Code to use the Quimby Act to provide 3.0 acres of community, neighborhood, and mini parks per 1,000 residents is consistent with this statutory requirement. Since the City currently provides less than 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents, the City cannot impose a higher standard through the Quimby Program.
The following formulas determine the amount of land to be dedicated or the fee to be paid in lieu of land dedication. The Quimby Fee will be calculated for both Single-Family and Multi-family residences; the assumptions and resulting Quimby fees are presented in the Tables Below.
Table 1 Persons per Household 1
.nd Uses
Single Family Residence 2.91
Multi-family Residence 2.72
Note:
1. Person per Household (PPH) per the 2020 US Census data.
Table 2 Land Cost per Acrel
$1,097,267
Note:
1. Land Costs per acre per CoStar inventory of 18 properties recorded between 2015 and 2020.
Table 3 Acres per 1,000 Population 1
cres per 1,000 Populati•
3.0 Note:
1. Standard Quimby acres of 3.0 per 1,000 Population
City of Upland October 28,2024
Park and Recreational Facilities Quimby Act Program Report Q age 204 3 222
Table 4 Quimby Fee Calculation
Land Us: PPH Acres/1,000 Cost per Acre Quimby • Single Family Residence 2.91 3.0 $1,097,267 $9,580 Multi-family Residence 2.72 3.0 $1,097,267 $8,946 City of Upland October 28,2024
Park and Recreational Facilities Quimby Act Program Report Q d oo agef05222
APPENDIX A
City of Upland
Parks and Recreational Facilities Quimby In-Lieu Fee Program
LAND INVENTORY
City of Upland October 28,2024
Park and Recreational Facilities Quimby Act Program Report Q age P6r OfC�
222
www.FinaneeDTA.com
18201 VON KARMAN SUITE 220
IRVINE, CA 92612
PHONE: (800) 969-4DTA
Public Finance
Public-Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
I Development Impact Fee / Quimby
Fee
4 www.FinanceDTA.com
Justification Study for the City of
Upland
October 28, 2024
Public Finance
Public-Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
Office Locations: Irvine/San Jose/San Francisco/Riverside/Dallas/Houston /Raleigh / Tampa
Impact Fee Basics - What Are They?
Development Impact Fees (DIFs) are one-time
fees assessed to recover infrastructure costs ,:F required to serve new development. rA 3 ' AB 1600, which created Section 66000 et seq. N' r of the Government Code, was enacted by the
State of California in 1987.
The State recognized the burden on local
governments from the rising costs associated
with needed infrastructure and population _ - increases with new development
DIFs provide an additional funding tool for
new infrastructure
Per AB 602 local governments must prepare a
Nexus Study every 8 years
A fee cannot include costs attributable to
existing deficiencies
2 dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
Development Impact Fees to be Updated
Last Updated in 2006
0 ;,9.ft. 1
General Facilities 4. ,. ________Ir-_-_ t &
, ,. . ...- , _,,,,,_....,-....;,_.,..,_. „,,, .....,,,,,,,,„,:o„,„44,,,,t,:.,-;''.....:."-_,;-41-. '.;.
Police...„ ___ , z.,- _� _.,,,_,,,,,lioik,v-:, _,_ _ 'i f� ,__. ... -_,...„-,„__:,_,, ,'-. J
..,...„, ,,„--:-,, -.--. „...„--„,.. . „. ,_____
Parks __
.- _.: - , _._,-,...,7r, „
Transportation { �.�
f T.R" i" k 4 y �Y
' ar 1 v-W t,,,..1...� :F':a�;tw N4"� ��:
aY,
Water F � .
41. Sewer - -
Storm Drain 4 _
3 dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
Impact Fee History
(The most recent Development Impact Fee Study was completed in 2006.) Land Use Residential per Dwelling Unit Non-Residential per 1,000 Square Foot Single Family Multi-Family Commercial Office • P General Faculties $993 $853 $161 $262 $161 Fire * $504 $432 $235 $381 $235 Police $902 $774 $147 $239 $147 Parks and Recreation $8,893 $7,633 N/A N/A.
Transportation $1,904 $1,169 $5,109 $2,809 $1,622 Water $3,768 $2,900 $1,559 $1,530 $890 Sewer $1,305 $918 $793 $556 $668 Storm Drain $2,856 $2,315 $4,029 $2,968 $3,570 *Fire DIF is no longer collected given the services provider contract with San Bernardino County Fire 4 dta
www.FinanceDTA.Com
Nexus Study Methodology
Proposed Fee Methodology
Fee Category Methodology Basis of Methodology
General Faculties Existing Standard
Police Standards-Based Existing Standard
Parks and Recreation Adopted Standard
Transportation Needs List
Water Needs List
Plan- Based
Sewer Needs List
Storm Drain Needs List
5 dta
www.FinanceDTA.COm
Nexus Study Methodology
Proposed Basis of Allocation
Fee Category Basis of Allocation of Benefit EDU/EBU General Faculties Persons Served EDU
Police Persons Served EDU
Parks and Recreation Recreation Hours per Week per Person EDU Transportation PM Peak hours per Trip EBU
Water Water Usage Rates(gallons per day) EBU Sewer Sewer Generation Reties(gallons per day) EBU Storm Drain Stormwater Runoff Coefficients(per EBU development acre
6 dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
Nexus StudyFindings
The City is approximately 95% built-out; a
majority of new development will be infill
development.
Fees presented in this Fee Study represent � - 140140 ;
the maximum DIFs that may be imposed _ s sk. �, by the City under the statutory - .4.. � requirements of Government Code ., ',-= _ w www.FinanceDTA.com
Proposed Development Impact Fee Schedule
_____
Land Use
Residential per Dwelling Unit Non-Residential per0 Square Foot Single Family Multi-Family Commercial Office Industrial General Faculties $0.78 $0.78 $1,305 $2,022 $669 Police $0.43 $0.43 $721 $1,118 $370 Parks and Recreation $4.80 $4.80 N/A N/A Transportation $0.07 $0.07 $494 $296 $89 Water $0.87 $0.87 $436 $611 $349 Sewer $0.05 $0.05 $27 $27 $27
Storm Drain $0.90 $0.90 $1,059 $1,003 $947 8 dta
www.FinanceDTA.COm
Quimby Fee
The Quimby Act under Californiay y t ; r ., Government Code Section 66477 '" •,,, ,_ ' , ' . '.►+ , _,, ,,,, - » tiw .
3.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. s�-3 ,,„ .'. ' x^
The fee is based only on land cost; the �. -, " , k ...-,;;x.` i, cost of developing the park facilities is - ; not included in the calculation --..� .. k Only applicable when subdivision occurs
(not typically applicable to rental A 4 e ,g $ -; ,� _ development) °,}gip, = -'
Last updated in 2006 z "� Eft". 1`1TIrZ-I.i Y n.4 ��� ��TA� ��ll.---
1 1
.- -.r7 T] ,,a
Calculated Fees:
Single Family Residence $9,580 per unit " ,
➢ Multi-family Residence $8,946 per unit
9 dtct
www.FinanceDTA.com
Recommendations
That the City Council;
Conduct a Public Hearing related to updating the City's Development Impact Fees and Quimby Fees.
Adopt a Resolution approving an update of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee Schedule and Amending the City's Fee Schedule.
Adopt a Resolution approving a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Making Findings Requirement by the Mitigation Fee Act.
Approve an annual cost escalator to the Development Impact Fees based on the California Construction Cost Index (CCCI) to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs.
10 dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
Questions or Concerns?
Stephen Parker Richard Ruiz Jr.
Assistant City Manager DTA
City of Upland, CA [email protected]
[email protected] (800) 969-4DTA x213
(909) 931 - 4121
11 dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
dl 0
www. inanceDTA.com
Thank You !
18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 220
Irvine, CA 92612
, trpl" CITY FUPLAND
„.;
"The City of Gracious Living"
Staff`kr
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: October 28,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN P.DEITSCH,CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE CITY MANAGER
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Fourth Amendment to the City of Upland City Manager Employment Agreement with Michael Blay,extending the term of the Employment Agreement to the end of business on November 8,2028,and increasing the vacation leave accrual rate to 160 hours per year.
GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal ensuring stability and consistency in City management.
BACKGROUND
In October 2021,the Upland City Council approved an Employment Agreement with Michael Blay to serve as City Manager("Employment Agreement"). The City Manager's first date of employment was November 9,2021.
The Employment Agreement was subsequently amended three times, on June 12, 2023, January 22, 2024, and July 24,2024.
The Employment Agreement,as amended,has an initial term that expires at the end of business on November 8,2024.
Also, among the benefits provided under that agreement, the City Manager accrues vacation leave at a rate of 128 hours per year.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The proposed Fourth Amendment to the Employment Agreement would extend the term of the City Manager's employment for four additional years to November 8, 2028. Notwithstanding this extension, the Employment Agreement could still be terminated prior to its expiration in accordance with its termination provisions.The proposed Fourth Amendment would also increase the City Manager's vacation leave accrual rate from 128 to 160 hours per year.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.
FISCAL IMPACTS
Because the Fourth Amendment increases the City Manager's vacation accrual rate, there may be more accrued vacation that the City would have to cash out upon the City Manager's retirement or separation from employment.
That amount cannot be calculated at this time and is dependent upon how much accrued vacation leave the City Manager takes each year.
ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.
CEQA:Not a Project.
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF UPLAND
CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(MICHAEL SLAY)
This Fourth Amendment to the City Manager Employment Agreement ("Fourth Amendment") between the City of Upland ("City") and Michael Blay ("Employee") is entered into this 28t1i day of October, 2024.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City entered into an original City Manager Employment Agreement with Employee on October 25, 2021 ("Agreement") and subsequently amended the Agreement on June 12, 2023, January 22, 2024, and July 22, 2024; and WHEREAS, City and Employee now desire to further amend the Agreement to extend its term and to increase the vacation accrual rate.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE,the above named parties hereby mutually agree and promise as follows:
1. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
"The City hereby agrees and does employ City Manager commencing on November 9, 2021 ("Commencement Date") and continuing until the end of business on November 8, 2028 or until terminated in accordance with Section 8 of this Agreement, whichever occurs first."
2. Section 4.A of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
"City Manager shall accrue vacation leave at a rate of 160 hours per year."
3. The new vacation accrual rate set forth in Section 2 above shall become effective beginning the first full payroll period after October 28, 2024.
4. Except as amended by this Fourth Amendment, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement, as previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
46708.00105\42821492.1
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF UPLAND
CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(MICHAEL SLAY)
The City and Employee have duly executed this Fourth Amendment as of the date first written above.
CITY OF UPLAND EMPLOYEE
By: By:
46708.00105\42821492.1 2