Agenda packet — Upland City Council, January 27, 2025 (part 1 of 8)

° Up CIoUPLAND
d
r *•
"The City of Giueious Lrzr+act '
r

EETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Bill Velto,Mayor
Rudy Zuniga, Mayor Pro Tern-District 4 Michael Blay, City Manager James Breitling, Couucilmember• District 2 Stephen P. Deitsch,City Attorney Carlos A.Garcia,Couucilmember- District 3 Keri Johnson,City Clerk Shannan Maust,Councilmember-District 1
Monday, January 27, 2025
Open session begins at 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
City Hall, 460 N. Euclid Avenue
Residents may observe the City Council meetings remotely via livestream on the City website, Spectrum Cable TV Channel 3, or Frontier Cable TV Channel 26.

City of Upland Mission Statement
The City of Upland is committed to delivering superior services that meet community needs with transparency and integrity.

City of Upland Vision Statement
Upland is a safe community with historic character where residents enjoy a high quality of life.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

2. ADDITIONS-DELETIONS TO AGENDA

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is a time for any citizen to comment on item listed on the closed session agenda only. Anyone wishing to address the legislative body is requested to submit a speaker card to the City Clerk at or prior to speaking. The speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than three (3) minutes. The use of visual aids will be included in the time limit.

CLOSED SESSION BEGINS AT 5:00 p.m.

4. CLOSED SESSION
a. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS California Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: Assessor Parcel Number: 2525 E. Riverside Drive, Ontario, CA (Whispering Lakes Golf Course) and 2200 E Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA (Ontario Soccer Park) (0113-281-13 and 0113-281-15
City Negotiators: City Manager Michael Blay
Negotiating Party: City of Ontario

Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment

5. INVOCATION
Mike Ingram, Christian Science Faith

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Boy Scout Troop 601

7. PRESENTATIONS
San Bernardino County Foster Program update by Diane Smyers of CASA of San Bernardino County

8. CITY ATTORNEY

9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is a time for any citizen to comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.

Anyone wishing to address the legislative body is requested to submit a speaker card to the City Clerk at or prior to speaking. The speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Speakers will be given five (5) minutes during public hearings. The use of visual aids will be included in the time limit. Public comments and questions for the purpose of hearing current matters of concern in our community and to provide citizens a method for the public to hear those concerns in an open venue is encouraged. However, under the provisions of the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from discussion of items not listed on the agenda, and therefore, the City Council, City Manager, or City Attorney will take communications under advisement for consideration and appropriate response or discussion at a later time.

Individuals who demonstrate disruptive conduct during City Council meetings that prevent the City Council from conducting its meeting in an orderly manner are guilty of a misdemeanor as stated in PC403, disrupting a public meeting, and are subject to removal from the chamber or arrest.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE: Pursuant Gov. Code § 84308, any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the legislative body request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Consent Calendar
a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7
Recommended Action:

Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of January 13, 2025. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson)
b. CONSIDER RATIFYING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS 11

COMMITTEE
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Ratify the appointment of Michael Miller to the Public Works Committee, term to expire in December 2026. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson)
c. CONSIDER RATIFYING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF 15

TRUSTEES
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Ratify the Mayor's appointment of Jessica Tancredi to the Library Board, term to expire June 30, 2026. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson)
d. DESIGNATION OF A DELEGATE TO REPRESENT THE CITY AT THE 19

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS GENERAL

ASSEMBLY MEETING
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Appoint Councilmember James Breitling as the delegate to represent the City of Upland at the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) General Assembly meeting on May 1, 2025. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson) e. TREASURER'S REPORT DECEMBER 2024 20
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Receive and file the December 2024 Treasurer's Report. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)
f. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF DECEMBER WARRANT AND PAYROLL 37

REGISTERS
CEQA: Not a Project
Recommended Action:

Approve the December warrant registers (check numbers 50905 — 51280 and direct disbursements totaling $9,367,264.93) and payroll registers totaling $1,966,287.76 (check numbers 164048 - 164062 and electronic fund transfers 51977 — 52547). (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)
g. CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION TO EXECUTE AND FILE 48

APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND GRANT

PROGRAMS WITH CALOES
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Adopt a Resolution to execute an application on behalf of the City of Upland and to file it with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)
h. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT 51 FOR
CUP 99-03 (WALGREENS), LOCATED AT 1241 WEST FOOTHILL

BOULEVARD
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Encroachment License Agreement for Conditional Use Permit 99-03 located at 1241 W. Foothill Boulevard; and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the agreement. (Staff Person: Robert Dalquest) i. CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITYWIDE SPEED 64

LIMITS AND RECEIVE AND FILE THE CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND

TRAFFIC SPEED SURVEY
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Receive and file the 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Survey and adopt a Resolution establishing citywide speed limits covering 57 road segments. (Staff Person: Robert Dalquest)
j. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC BILL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAN 585

BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF UPLAND
CEQA: Not a project.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Electric Bill Agreement for Fire Station 163 between the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District and the City of Upland; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis) k. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL 595

SERVICES AGREEMENT AND A PURCHASE ORDER INCREASE FOR

ELIZABETH DALEY PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CEQA: Not a Project
Recommended Action:

Approve the First Amendment to the professional services agreement with Elizabeth Daley for project management services and approve a corresponding purchase order increase; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis)
I. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE TO THE PURCHASE ORDER WITH 614 KSM ELECTRIC IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,000
CEQA: Categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c), of the CEQA guidelines. The City filed the Notice of Exemption

with the County of San Bernardino on October 30, 2024.

Recommended Action:

Approve a $23,000 increase to Purchase Order No. 20250096, for a total purchase order amount of $53,000, to pay for additional electrical services for Water Facility Improvements. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis) m. CONSIDER ACCEPTING THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR ARROW 617

HIGHWAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND UTILITY
CEQA: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301(c) (Existing Facilities), of the CEQA guidelines. The City filed the Notice of Exemption on October 4, 2022.

Recommended Action:

Accept the work; authorize the City Manager or designee to record the Notice of Completion; and reduce the Faithful Performance Bond to 10% for the Arrow Highway Pavement Rehabilitation and Utility Improvements Project. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis)
n. CONSIDER AWARD OF BID FOR PROJECT NO. 92105, 92106 & 92107, 619 RESERVOIR R-10, R-11, R-12A & R-13A OVERFLOW AIR GAP INSTALLATION PROJECT (BID NO. 2024-14)
CEQA: Categorically Exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c). The City filed the Notice of Exemption with the County of San Bernardino on January 15, 2025.

Recommended Action:

Approve the plans and specifications for Project No. 92105, 92106 & 92107, Reservoir R-10, R-11, R-12A & R-13A Overflow Air Gap Installation; award a construction contract to RE Chaffee Construction, Inc. in the amount of $126,950 (Base bid amount plus additive item #4), approve a construction contingency in the amount of $33,050 for a total amount of $160,000; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and any future amendments within the City Manager's authority. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis)

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING, TRAINING, OR

CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE
Councilmembers will provide oral reports on any meetings, trainings, or conferences they attended on behalf of the City. This item is for information only. b. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING, JANUARY 14, 2025 621 The Committee Chairperson will report on the meeting. This is an information item only.

13. BUSINESS ITEMS
a. DISCUSSION REGARDING CITY COMMITTEES APPOINTED TO ADVISE THE 626

COUNCIL
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Discuss City committees appointed to advise the City Council and direct staff to bring back a Resolution reflecting any recommended changes for consideration at a subsequent Council meeting. (Staff Person: Michael Blay) b. UPDATE ON THE DRAFT REGIONAL NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE 646

ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT NEGOTIATION
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Receive and file the presentation on the Tentative National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for the Counties of Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Related to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Tentative Order No. R8-2024-0001. (Staff Person: Chris Alanis)

14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS

15. CITY MANAGER

16. ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is Monday, February 10, 2025.

NOTE: If you challenge the public hearing(s) or the related environmental determinations in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Upland, at, or prior to, the public hearing.

All Agenda items and back-up materials are available for public review at the Upland Public Library, at 450 North Euclid Avenue, the City Clerk's Office at 460 North Euclid Avenue and the City website at www.uplandca.gov .

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office, 909-931-4120.

Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II].

To access written transcription during the meeting, please click this link:
https://attend.wordly.ai/join/LVGO-0906 . Then choose language and click attend to read the transcript on your device.

On January 22, 2025 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at 450 N. Euclid Avenue (Upland Public Library) and 460 N. Euclid Avenue (Upland City Hall), and the City website at www.uplandca.gov

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE UPLAND CITY COUNCIL January 13, 2025
6:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
City Hall, 460 N. Euclid Avenue
Members Present: Mayor Bill Velto, Councilmember James Breitling, Councilmember Shannan Maust, Councilmember Rudy Zuniga
Members Absent: Councilmember Carlos A. Garcia
Staff Present: City Manager Michael Blay, City Attorney Stephen P. Deitsch, City Clerk Keri Johnson

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The regular meeting of the Upland City Council was called to order by Mayor Bill Velto at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Upland City Hall.

Moved by: Councilmember Breitling
Seconded by: Councilmember Zuniga
Excuse the absence of Councilmember Garcia.

Motion: Carried Unanimously with Councilmember Garcia absent

2. ADDITIONS-DELETIONS TO AGENDA
City Clerk Johnson announced that the presentation recognizing the Sponsors of the Hometown Holiday Parade and Faire was removed from the agenda and would be brought back at a subsequent meeting.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.

CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 p.m.

4. CLOSED SESSION
At 5:01 p.m. Mayor Velto announced that the City Council would recess to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code.
a. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS California Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 1,400 square foot parcel located on the east side of Grove Avenue, approximately 470 feet north of Foothill Boulevard in the City of Upland (Assessor Parcel Number: 0207-462-02)
1

Page 7 of 705 ends

City Negotiators: City Manager Michael Blay and Development Services Director Robert Dalquest
Negotiating Party: Jonathan K. Cornelius, Fore Property Company Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
The City Council reconvened in open session at 6:01 p.m.

5. INVOCATION
Pastor Laurie Baiz, Life Bible Fellowship Church

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Police Chief Blanco

7. PRESENTATIONS
Certificate of Recognition to the Friends of the Upland Library for their Successful Fundraising during Adult Literacy Awareness Week

8. CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Deitsch announced the City Council received a report on Closed Session Item 4a and there was no reportable action during Closed Session.

9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Sophia Siqueiros, Field Representative from Congresswoman Norma Torres office, introduced herself to the City Council and affirmed the Congresswoman's dedication to local government efforts.

Gary Schwary, Upland, stated that he was honored to be considered for appointment to the City Council Advisory Committee.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
Moved by: Councilmember Breitling
Seconded by: Councilmember Zuniga
Approve the Consent Calendar
Motion: Carried Unanimously with Councilmember Garcia absent a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approve the Special Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2024 and the Regular Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2024.
b. ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEMBER Accept the resignation from Library Board of Trustees Member Lester Sandy. c. CONSIDER RATIFYING REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE CITY COUNCIL

ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Ratify the appointments of Gary Schwary and Stephanie Wells to the City Council Advisory Committee with terms to expire in December 2028. 2

Page 8 of 705 ends

d. ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEMBER Accept the resignation from Public Works Committee Member Andrew Rubio. e. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER WARRANT AND PAYROLL

REGISTERS
Approve the November warrant registers (check numbers 50557 — 50904 and direct disbursements) totaling $8,858,086.70 and payroll registers totaling $1,928,953.64 (check numbers 164007 — 164047 and electronic fund transfers 51413 — 51976).
f. TREASURER'S REPORT NOVEMBER 2024
Receive and file the November 2024 Treasurer's Report.
g. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO A PROFESSIONAL

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GEOGRAPHICS
Approve Amendment No. 2 to the professional consultant services agreement with Geographics for creative support, text, copy, graphic design and layout, artwork services, print production, and mailing of the City's Upland Today News Magazine.
h. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DTA FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY
Approve a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with DTA in an amount not-to-exceed $3,200 and extend the term through February 28, 2025.

CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN OF STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ON 14TH STREET

AND GROVE AVENUE
Approve a professional services agreement with HR Green for the preparation of street, water, and sewer improvement construction documents for 14th Street, between Campus Avenue and Grove Avenue, and for Grove Avenue, between Foothill Blvd. and 15th Street in the amount of $421,378; approve a contingency in the amount of $43,622, for a total amount of $465,000; and, authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and any future amendments within the City Manager's authority.
j. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 FOR PROJECT NO. 82347, PD AIR HANDLER REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Approve Change Order No. 3 for Project No. 82347, PD Air Handler Replacement Project with F.M. Thomas Air Conditioning, Inc., in the amount of $98,626; and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the change order.
k. CONSIDER AWARD OF BID FOR PROJECT NO. 82358, ELECTRIC VEHICLE

CHARGING STATIONS AT PUBLIC WORKS
3

Page 9 of 705 ends

Approve the purchase of nine (9) CPF50 dual port, level 2 electric vehicle charging stations and one (1) CPE250 dual port, DC fast charging station from ChargePoint, Inc. in the amount of $99,942.02, authorize the City Manager to finalize the purchase of the charging stations through Sourcewell Contract No. 042221-CPI; and approve a budget amendment to increase the Fiscal Year 2024-25 General Fund Capital Project Account No. 4257500-82358 in the amount of$275,000 for Project No. 82358.

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING, TRAINING, OR

CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE
No reports.

13. BUSINESS ITEMS

14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmembers announced various activities and events throughout the community.

15. CITY MANAGER
City Manager Blay introduced Interim Public Works Director Alanis, who provided an update on the advance preparation and clean-up efforts from the recent wind event.

16. ADJOURNMENT
At 6:31 p.m., Mayor Velto adjourned in memory of retired Police Captain John Cannon and retired Police Department employee Theora Kazerooni. The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is Monday, January 27, 2025.

Keri Johnson, City Clerk
4

Page 10 of 705 ends

��o� zip, CI FUPLAND
, „. .7...
4 "The City of Gracious Lining"
Staff
DATE: January 27,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:KERI JOHNSON,CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: CONSIDER RATIFYING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council ratify the appointment of Michael Miller to the Public Works Committee, term to expire in December 2026.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to provide opportunities for the citizenry to participate in local government through service on various committees,commissions,and boards.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Committee(Committee)is a standing legislative committee of the City Council and consists of two Councilmembers and five citizen advisory members. The function of the Committee is to provide an opportunity for review and fact finding relative to significant projects, programs, or activities in public works operations prior to consideration by the entire Council. Citizen Advisory Members of the Committee are the reviewing body for street tree removal requests.

The City Clerk's office received Committee Member Andrew Rubio's resignation on January 3,2025.This resignation created an unscheduled vacancy, and Government Code Section 549574 requires vacancies to be posted for 10 working days before a new appointment can be made.The notice of unscheduled vacancy was posted at City Hall,the Library, and on the City's website on January 6, 2025 and the City Council accepted Committee Member Rubio's resignation on January 13,2025.

Committee Member Rubio was Council Member Garcia's representative on this committee.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Councilmember Garcia has chosen to appoint Michael Miller as his representative on the Public Works Committee, term to expire in December 2026.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

Page 11 of 705 ends

70 rn
n'1� C9
�4 or d City of Upland
Public Service Application for Commissions,
Wzi
e �°
�rFOg Committees, or Boards &-c
:rs.
m
70 I am applying to serve on the following commission, committee, and/or board.

Public Works Committee, Council Advisory Committee
Name: Michael Anthony Miller
Upland, CA 91786
Home Address:

Primary Phone: Secondary Phone:

Email Address:

Which district do you live in?
l] District 1 0 District 3
0 District 2 0 District 4
Current occupation: Director of Special Projects, San Bernardino County, BOS Professional/educational background:

For the last 10 years, I have been a contracted employee with San Bernardino County, specifically working for Supervisor Curt Hagman. For the last 2 years, I have also been appointed as a board consultant at South Coast Air Quality Management District.

Previously, I worked for a consulting firm on Net Energy Metering policy at the state level. I graduated from the University of La Verne with a B.A. in Political Science.

Why are you interested in serving on a commission, committee, or board? I am passionate about Upland thriving and believe my professional background has given me the tools to help better our community. Upland is an incredible and diverse community with a rich history, safe neighborhoods, and that small town charm that has allowed me and my family to flourish. I believe we can find ways to continue to improve Upland and make it the best city in the region.

Describe any other skill experience that you possess that will qualify you for the commission, committee, or board desired:

As a Special Projects Director, I have worked closely with County departments on public works projects from an administrative perspective. I have helped to try and find funding and worked to move funding around when needed. I am also very experienced in evaluating policies and projects. As such, I will be able to bring ideas from different organizations.As an AQMD Board Consultant, I also become aware of grant opportunities that the City may be able to apply for. I am very familiar with the western region of San Bernardino County and the City of Upland.

Page 12 of 705 ends

List three (3) community references:

1. NAME:Ryan Kolter
PHONE

2. NAME:Darrick Elmore
PHONE

3. NAME:Jenna Gough
PHONE
On a separate sheet please answer the following:

What do you feel are the most inportant issues facing the City of Upland? (300 words or less)
I declare, under penalty of disqualification and termination, that all statements in this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I further declare that if I am appointed, I will serve fairly, impartially, and to the best of my ability.

I am available at the time of the regularly scheduled meetings of the commission, committee, or board to which I am applying.

I further acknowledge that information contained in this application is a public record and may be subject to public inspection pursuant to the California Records Act (CA Gov. Code § 6250 et seq.). Applications are kept on file in the City Clerk's office for a period of three years. 12/10/2024
Signature: Date:

I read and un erstand the above statement
Please return y, r completed, signed application to [email protected] or submit to:

City of Upland
Office of the City Clerk
460 N Euclid Ave
Upland, CA 91786
Unsigned applications will not be accepted.

Page 13 of 705 ends

The two most important issues facing our city are working to build back infrastructure and continuing business development and investment.

As a resident, I have seen and heard about the deterioration of our public infrastructure. This infrastructure is what every community member interacts with every day and what our city is judged on when neighbors visit. We must continue to prioritize rehabilitating our roads, sidewalks, and what citizens often do not see—drains, water pipes, water tanks, etc.

Not only will this improve the citizens' approval of the city, but it will also help with another important issue for the city, business development and investment. We are the city of gracious living, and if the infrastructure does not continue to be rehabilitated, we will become less attractive to businesses.

Fixing these issues would allow us to continue to resolve issues of the past and bring back the pride residents feel living in Upland.

Page 14 of 705 ends

�� pl"� CITY
UPLAND
"The City of Gracious Living"
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: January 27,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:KERI JOHNSON,CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: CONSIDER RATIFYING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council ratify the Mayor's appointment of Jessica Tancredi to the Library Board,term to expire June 30,2026.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to provide opportunities for the citizenry to participate in local government through service on various committees,commissions,and boards.

BACKGROUND
The Library Board was established by ordinance in 1913 and the composition and terms of office were amended pursuant to California Library Laws in 1990. The Board is charged with providing materials and staff assistance for meeting the information and educational needs of library users.

Board Member Lester Sandy submitted his resignation, effective December 31, 2024, to the City Clerk's office on November 12,2024 and the City Council accepted his resignation on January 13,2025.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54974 the notice of unscheduled vacancy was posted at City Hall,the Library, and the City's website on January 6,2025.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 40605 and Resolution No. 6704 the Mayor shall appoint the Library Board Members,subject to ratification by a majority of the Council.

Ms. Tancredi submitted an application to the City Clerk's office in 2023 and has expressed her desire to serve on the Library Board,the term of this appointment would be through June 30,2026.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

Page 15 of 705 ends

of viz
C2
City of Upland 1
1 / :' Public Service Application for Commissions, e$
Naz
it IF olltIS Committees, or Boards
1,4
COE
41"es
I am applying to serve on the following commission, committee, and/or board.

Library Board
Name: Jessica Tancredi
Upland, CA 91786
Home Address:

Primary Phone: Secondary Phone:

Email Address:

Which district do you live in?
❑ District 1 ❑ District 3
❑ District 2 13 District 4
Adjunct English Professor
Current occupation:

Professional/educational background:

I have my BA in English from CSU San Bernardino and my MA in Linguistics from Cal State Long Beach. I taught ESL at the college level for 5 years at CSU Fullerton and Cal Poly Pomona, and I currently teach English Composition at Chaffey College where I have been teaching since 2016. I also homeschool my 3 children.

Why are you interested in serving on a commission, committee, or board? As a lifelong resident, 3rd generation resident of the City of Upland, and a parent of 3 young children, I am invested in our city's future and want to be more involved in the community. I have a passion for reading and literacy. I want to be part of the work the library is doing and contribute ideas that could help others learn to love reading and use the library's resources to better themselves and our community.

Describe any other skill experience that you possess that will qualify you for the commission, committee, or board desired:

I worked with non-native English speakers as a 1-on-1 tutor and as teacher for over 6 years, so I understand the struggles that many of our non-native speakers face when it comes to reading and literacy. As a lifelong resident of the city, I have been going to the library since I was very young, and now, my children and I are frequent visitors to the library and the bookstore, so I am very familiar with the library itself and its evolution over the years. I love to read and am always reading several books in a variety of genres. I am a firm believer in the power of story and self-education through books.

Page 16 of 705 ends

List three (3) community references:

Don O'Connell

1. NAME: _ PHONE:

Christina LeMaster

2. NAME: PHONE:

Amy Valdivia

3. NAME:__ PHONE:

On a separate sheet please answer the following:

What do you feel are the most important issues facing the City of Upland? (300 words or less)
I declare, under penalty of disqualification and termination, that all statements in this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I further declare that if I am appointed, I will serve fairly, impartially, and to the best of my ability.

I am available at the time of the regularly scheduled meetings of the commission, committee, or board to which I am applying.

Signature: Date: II I 7/ 2-3
I r`-ad and understand the abov_'statement
Please return your completed, signed application to [email protected] or submit to:

City of Upland
Office of the City Clerk
460 N Euclid Ave
Upland, CA 91786
Unsigned applications will not be accepted.

Page 17 of 705 ends

The Most Important Issues Facing Upland
One of the most important issues facing the City of Upland is community involvement.

As the city continues to grow and evolve, and people move in and out, a sense of community can falter, and yet this is one the most important aspects to actively cultivate in order to maintain a flourishing city. The library already offers wonderful programs that serve to foster community engagement, and I think there is still more potential to be unlocked. Through more relevant and engaging events and opportunities, residents can continue or begin to become more connected with one another, see the value of our city's resources, and desire to make contributions themselves.

Another extremely important issue is future generations, not only educating but also inspiring the children of our community. Since Covid, many children are struggling academically. I am a huge advocate for helping children(and adults) learn to love reading because we all benefit immensely from stories. Reading has been shown to inspire imagination, foster open-mindedness, and evoke empathy for others, not to mention the more obvious benefits of larger vocabulary and improved ability to communicate clearly. These qualities not only benefit the individual,but also those around them and the community as a whole. Stories have the power to change hearts and educate minds and when that happens, everyone benefits. Book clubs, reading challenges, classes and more can all work in harmony to foster community spirit and pride, build relationships, educate, and inspire individuals. I look forward to putting my experience educating children and adults and my love of reading and passion for literacy to good use for our city as a member of the Upland Public Library Board of Directors.

Page 18 of 705 ends

�� pl"� CITY
UPLAND
"The City of Gracious Living"
Staff`kr
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: February 12,2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:KERI JOHNSON,CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF A DELEGATE TO REPRESENT THE CITY AT THE SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council appoint Councilmember James Breitling as the delegate to represent the City of Upland at the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) General Assembly meeting on May 1, 2025.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to participate in activities in developing policies for California cities.

BACKGROUND
The City of Upland is a member of SCAG,a planning organization representing six counties, 191 cities and more than 19 million residents in an area covering over 38,000 square miles. SCAG is involved in coordinating a number of planning and policy initiatives related to Southern California transportation and land-use planning

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The SCAG General Assembly meeting will take place May 1,2025.In order to vote in the SCAG General Assembly meeting,the City Council must designate a representative.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA.The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

Page 19 of 705 ends

, trpl" CITY FUPLAND
„.;
"The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krcifil
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: January 27,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,CPA,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

STACI SULLIVAN,FINANCE MANAGER

DARREN CHAN,ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT DECEMBER 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the December 2024 Treasurer's Report.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to manage the City's resources in a fiscally responsible manner.

BACKGROUND
Per California Government Code Section 53646(b),the City's treasurer or chief fiscal officer may render a treasurer's report to the City Council on a quarterly basis. The City has elected to provide this report to City Council monthly, but the City of Upland's Investment Policy(Approved June 10, 2024) requires the Investment Officer to provide a report quarterly to the Finance Committee at regularly scheduled meetings. This report shall include the type of investment, issuer, date of maturity,par, and dollar amount invested on all securities, current market value as of the date of the report,investments and monies held by the local agency and shall additionally include a description of any of the local agency's funds,investments,or programs,that are under the management of contracted parties,including lending programs. The report shall include a statement of compliance with the investment policy and shall include a statement noting the City's ability to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The submission of the monthly Treasurer's Report is a compliance measure.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

Page 20 of 705 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority For Period Ended
December 31,2024
Investment Portfolio Cost Par Value Market Value %of Portfolio State Local Agency Investment Fund 1,274,781 1,274,781 1,286,657 1.0% California Asset Management Plan 21,436,959 21,436,959 21,436,959 17.4% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 20,972,003 20,950,000 20,915,991 17.0% Money Market Fund 2,970,445 2,970,445 2,970,445 2.4% Municipal Bonds 5,413,106 5,555,000 5,379,438 4.4% Government Agency Securities 68,136,002 68,907,193 66,795,537 54.1% US Treasury 4,593,925 4,750,000 4,573,988 3.7% Total Investments $ 124,797,220 $ 125,844,378 $ 123,359,014 100.0% Weighted Average Days to Maturity 587.03
Blended Yield: 2.88%
Cash Cost Market Value
Bank Accounts and Change Funds 9,249,352 9,249,352 Total Cash $ 9,249,352 $ 9,249,352
Total Cash and Investments $ 134,046,572 $ 132,608,367 PARS Investment Portfolio Cost Market Value
115 Trust-OPEB Investment 1,800,968 2,344,893
115 Trust-Pension Investment 7,457,904 8,430,889 Total Restricted Funds Held in Trust $ 9,258,872 $ 10,775,782 Benchmarks:

LAIF 4.43% _
CAMP 4.65% _
2yr U.S.Treasury 4.25% _
5yr U.S.Treasury 4.38%
Restricted Funds with Fiscal Agent Book Value Market Value Water Revenue Bonds 2022 15,502,081 15,502,081 Water System Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds 2021 - - Successor Agency TARBS 2013/2016-Merged Project 2 2 Colonies CFD Area#1 2022 294,866 294,866
Colonies CFD Area#2 2015 1,328,159 1,328,159
Upland 54 CFD 2004 128,003 128,003
Sycamore Hills CFD 2015-1 744,258 744,258
Harvest at Upland CFD 2016-1 Area#1 580,730 580,730 Harvest at Upland CFD 2016-1 Area#2 2,156,917 2,156,917 Enclave at Upland CFD 2022-1 4,120,735 4,120,735 Sycamore Hills CFD 2015-1-2 STB 2022A 771,563 771,563 Total Restricted Funds $ 25,627,314 $ 25,627,314

1. I hereby certify that the investments are in compliance with the investment policy adopted by the City Council in June 10,2024.

2. The City has the ability to meet its budgeted expenditures for the next six months.

3. The market values for funds held in banking institutions do not change. The amounts listed as market values for these items are the same as their book values.

4. The book value for the State Pool is the withdrawal value provided by the State Treasurer.The market value of funds held by the State Treasurer equates to the City's pro-rata share of the market value of the entire State Pool.

5. Sources for current market valuation are Account Statements and the Wall Street Journal GNMA Mortgage rates on the last trading day of the month.

6. This report meets the requirements of Government Code Section 53646. ,—DocuSigned by:
sry ..Pam, 1/16/2025 I 9:58 AM PST
Assistant City Manager(Finance Director) Date
DocuSigned by:
1/19/2025 1 5:14 AM PST
City Treasurer Date Pi I21)4EIP 706n

Page 1 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority State Local Agency Investment Fund
For Period Ended
December 31, 2024
Account
Fund or Account Balance
City 98-36-942 1,274,781
Market
Value
Totals $ 1,274,781 $ 1,286,657
Yield for Period Ended 12/31/2024 4.43%
Prepare0a�e 2re �

Page 2 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority California Asset Management Plan
For Period Ended
December 31, 2024
Account
Fund or Account Balance
City of Upland 6113-001 21,436,959
Market
Value
Totals $ 21,436,959 $ 21,436,959
Yield for Period Ended 12/31/2024 4.65%
PrepareOaye� e �

Page 3 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority US Bank Investments
For Period Ended
December 31,2024
Par Market Stated Maturity
Investment Name CUSIP Cost Value Value Rate Date Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
A+FCU CD 00224TAN6 250,000 250,000 251,638 4.67% 02/17/2026 Alabama CU CD 01025RAF6 250,000 250,000 252,193 5.01% 12/22/2025 Ally Bank Utah CD 02007GH22 250,000 250,000 250,085 4.65% 12/22/2025 American Equity Bank CD 02568KAJ4 250,000 250,000 238,465 0.73% 05/27/2026 American Exp CD 02589AEZ1 250,000 250,000 255,065 4.51% 09/13/2028 BMW Bank North America CD 05580AXF6 250,000 250,000 243,505 0.51% 09/25/2025 Bank Hapoalim CD 06251A6Z8 244,000 244,000 249,802 4.40% 05/21/2029 BankUnited NA CD 066519RW1 249,000 249,000 236,677 1.42% 12/08/2026 Baxter CU CD 07181JAY0 250,000 250,000 252,418 4.46% 01/25/2027 Burke Herbert Finanical Services CD 121331AT9 249,000 249,000 249,070 4.75% 02/13/2026 California CD 130162BB5 250,000 250,000 253,078 5.58% 10/27/2025 Capital One NA CD 14042RQN4 250,000 250,000 237,173 1.32% 12/08/2026 Chartway FCU CD 16141BAD3 248,000 248,000 250,135 5.01% 12/16/2025 Citibank CD 17325FBK3 513,250 500,000 497,865 4.87% 08/06/2029 City FCU Tax CD 17783PAJ0 249,000 249,000 248,509 3.96% 01/12/2029 City National Bank CD 178180GU3 250,000 250,000 250,583 4.34% 01/12/2026 Clearpath FCU CD 18507MAB7 250,000 250,000 250,088 5.10% 04/27/2026 Communitywide FCU CD 20416TAX0 250,000 250,000 251,418 4.67% 01/06/2026 Connex CU CD 208212BD1 250,000 250,000 253,825 5.32% 03/18/2026 Connexus CU CD 20825WBR0 250,000 250,000 251,153 5.13% 06/23/2025 Continental Bank CD 211163MG2 250,000 250,000 236,325 0.63% 08/24/2026 Cornerstone CD 21923MAB7 249,000 249,000 245,768 3.75% 10/01/2029 Customers Bank CD 23204HPB8 250,000 250,000 253,933 4.43% 06/14/2028 Discover Bank CD 254676AR0 250,000 250,000 255,623 4.55% 09/18/2028 Dort FCU CD 25844MBC1 250,000 250,000 253,108 4.89% 06/22/2026 Empower FCU CD 291916AE4 250,000 250,000 256,160 5.32% 10/23/2026 Enerbank USA CD 29278TMR8 250,000 250,000 249,498 1.80% 01/29/2025 Essential CU CD 29669XAP3 250,000 250,000 254,015 4.62% 06/15/2027 Fahey Banking Co CD 303117DG7 250,000 250,000 249,260 3.91% 01/12/2028 First Carolina Bank CD 31944MBJ3 250,000 250,000 241,318 0.52% 12/23/2025 First Foundation Bank CD 32026U5U6 244,000 244,000 249,807 4.49% 05/22/2029 FirstBank of Nebraska CD 32116PAR9 248,000 248,000 234,298 0.63% 08/27/2026 1st Security Bank of Washington CD 33625CDR7 250,000 250,000 247,095 0.30% 04/16/2025 1st Source Bank CD 33646CNW0 250,000 250,000 249,940 4.60% 01/19/2027 First Technology FCU CD 33715LEB2 249,000 249,000 246,796 3.68% 08/05/2027 General Electric CU CD 369674CJ3 250,000 250,000 250,150 5.00% 02/14/2025 Generations Bank C D 37149CAV9 250,000 250,000 244,893 3.16% 05/06/2027 Gesa CU CD 37424PAH7 250,000 250,000 254,568 5.16% 07/31/2026 Global ECU CD 37892MAM6 248,000 248,000 251,231 4.94% 06/16/2026 Great Midwest CD 39083PDQ2 249,000 249,000 253,930 4.41% 04/27/2029 Greenstate CU CD 39573LCC0 250,000 250,000 242,888 0.93% 11/24/2025 Gulf Cap Bank CD 40219MAY0 248,000 248,000 246,681 3.87% 09/27/2028 Ideal CU CD 45157PAY6 125,000 125,000 124,883 4.00% 08/29/2025 Industrial Commercial Bank China CD 45581ECJ8 250,000 250,000 247,630 0.45% 03/31/2025 Iriquois Fed CD 46355PDQ8 249,000 249,000 253,447 4.62% 09/17/2027 Jeanne D Arc CD 472207AK5 249,000 249,000 252,319 4.34% 07/31/2028 JPMorgan Chase Bank CD 48128URC5 250,000 250,000 242,408 0.52% 11/10/2025 Kemba FCU CD 48836LBK7 248,000 248,000 248,327 5.39% 05/29/2029 Pre4yrarfnn

Page 4 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority US Bank Investments
For Period Ended
December 31,2024
Par Market Stated Maturity
Investment Name CUSIP Cost Value Value Rate Date Liberty FED CD 53052LAU3 248,000 248,000 248,942 5.08% 06/09/2025 Live Oak Banking Company CD 538036NV2 250,000 250,000 243,728 0.56% 09/16/2025 Malaga Bank CD 56102ABK1 250,000 250,000 235,600 0.90% 11/19/2026 Medallion Bank CD 58404DGK1 250,000 250,000 248,223 1.31% 03/27/2025 Meritrust FCU MTN CD 59001PAR0 225,000 225,000 223,922 3.22% 06/30/2025 Merrick Bank CD 59013KFH4 250,000 250,000 249,470 1.75% 01/31/2025 Milestone Bk CD 59934MAK4 244,000 244,000 245,906 4.37% 12/15/2026 Morgan Stanley CD 616900RE0 244,000 244,000 250,293 4.53% 05/22/2029 Morgan Stanley CD 61768E4B6 244,000 244,000 250,293 4.53% 05/22/2029 NBC Bancorp Inc CD 633398AA0 248,000 248,000 251,286 4.79% 09/14/2026 New York Community Bank CD 649447UY3 250,000 250,000 245,458 0.51% 07/01/2025 Optum Bank Draper CD 68405VAU3 244,000 244,000 248,260 4.62% 09/13/2027 Partners Bank of California CD 70212YAZ5 250,000 250,000 247,910 1.01% 04/02/2025 People's Bank CD 710275AH1 250,000 250,000 250,155 4.05% 01/12/2027 Popular Bank CD 73317ABL5 250,000 250,000 249,955 4.10% 01/08/2026 Poppy Bank CD 73319FAF6 235,893 229,000 227,415 1.11% 03/18/2025 Preferred CU CD 74043RAA2 250,000 250,000 256,348 4.88% 09/15/2027 Red Crown Fed CD 756558AB8 200,000 200,000 204,664 5.28% 10/13/2026 Solarity CU CD 83418NAG6 248,000 248,000 251,460 4.98% 06/23/2026 Southeast Bank CD 84133PFC7 250,000 250,000 245,720 0.46% 06/17/2025 Southern First CD 84287PJB9 244,000 244,000 251,849 4.70% 10/17/2028 Souther States Bank CD 843879EZ6 249,000 249,000 249,120 4.45% 04/14/2025 Spokane Teachers CD 849061AC0 248,000 248,000 248,221 5.65% 01/28/2025 State Employees CD 85678LAA3 249,000 249,000 253,475 4.71% 05/24/2027 Tandem Bank CD 87537YAB0 250,000 250,000 245,903 0.56% 06/23/2025 Technology CU CD 87868YAH6 248,000 248,000 248,084 5.10% 07/21/2025 Texas Exchange Bank CD 88241TMG2 249,000 249,000 236,122 1.21% 11/13/2026 Third Federal Savings&Loan CD 88413QDE5 250,000 250,000 246,663 0.81% 05/23/2025 Toyota Financial Savings Bank CD 89235MLE9 249,860 248,000 236,287 1.00% 07/29/2026 True Sky Credit CD 89786MAH7 250,000 250,000 253,363 4.44% 11/30/2027 TTCU Federal CU CD 89854LAD5 250,000 250,000 258,275 4.84% 07/26/2028 Tucson FCU CD 898812AC6 250,000 250,000 258,525 4.83% 09/08/2028 USAlliance FCU CD 90352RCD5 100,000 100,000 97,091 1.39% 01/28/2026 USAlliance FCU CD 90352RDL6 149,000 149,000 153,264 4.57% 06/28/2029 Union Bank CD 90520VAX1 250,000 250,000 239,618 0.63% 03/19/2026 Utah First CD 91739JAJ4 249,000 249,000 254,408 4.45% 04/30/2029 Vibrant CU CD 92559TAL2 248,000 248,000 251,683 5.27% 03/20/2026 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Subtotal $ 20,972,003 $ 20,950,000 $ 20,915,991 Cash and Equivalents(Money Market Fund)
First American Govt OB Fund-Y 31846V203 2,970,445 2,970,445 2,970,445 4.07% Money Market Fund Subtotal $ 2,970,445 $ 2,970,445 $ 2,970,445 Municipal Bond Fund
Burbank Glendale, CA 120827EJ5 2,029,661 1,990,000 2,024,586 5.09% 07/01/2029 Corona,CA 21969AAH5 924,000 1,000,000 899,460 2.27% 05/01/2029 Pregiyirnn

Page 5 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority US Bank Investments
For Period Ended
December 31,2024
Par Market Stated Maturity
Investment Name CUSIP Cost Value Value Rate Date Klamath Trinity,CA-2021 B 498422JJ4 15,075 15,000 14,764 1.55% 08/01/2025 Riverside,CA 769036BR4 944,250 1,000,000 926,760 3.05% 06/01/2029 Riverside Cnty,CA 76913CBA6 950,120 1,000,000 981,700 2.92% 02/15/2026 San Bernardino,CA 796720PA2 300,000 300,000 294,120 0.85% 08/01/2025 San Bernardino,CA 796720PB0 250,000 250,000 238,048 1.15% 08/01/2026 Municipal Bond Fund Subtotal $ 5,413,106 $ 5,555,000 $ 5,379,438 Government Securities
Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AKLH7 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,458,540 0.77% 12/30/2025 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AKQX7 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,925,920 0.73% 01/28/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AKWK8 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,918,500 0.53% 02/12/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AL6A7 1,000,000 1,000,000 962,070 0.83% 02/26/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AL6L3 1,000,000 1,000,000 961,390 0.65% 02/26/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130ALN34 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,091,145 0.71% 03/24/2025 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130ALPJ7 1,000,000 1,000,000 983,350 0.83% 06/30/2025 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130ALZ80 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,269,970 0.77% 04/29/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AMBD3 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,453,455 1.03% 05/12/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AMET5 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,943,740 1.80% 05/27/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AMZP0 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,491,210 0.65% 02/28/2025 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AN3R9 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,427,730 1.19% 07/20/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130APJ55 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,515,280 1.32% 10/26/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130APU37 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,417,095 1.38% 11/24/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130APV51 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,947,500 1.28% 11/24/2026 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AQ5D1 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,455,660 1.24% 12/22/2025 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130ARCL3 1,000,000 1,000,000 959,330 2.61% 03/30/2027 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130ARKL4 591,600 600,000 598,260 4.27% 04/21/2027 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AUS88 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,345 5.00% 02/16/2028 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AWBZ2 998,300 1,000,000 995,840 4.15% 06/11/2027 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 3130AWTR1 1,991,760 2,000,000 1,999,200 4.38% 09/08/2028 Fed Home Ln Mort Corp#WN1356 3132XFQJ0 1,481,250 1,500,000 1,476,060 4.38% 04/01/2029 Fed Home Ln Mort Corp#WN2560 3132XGZ25 994,688 1,000,000 993,350 4.89% 01/01/2029 Fed Home Ln Mort Corp#WN5034F 3132XKSY4 2,012,500 2,000,000 1,940,620 4.28% 07/01/2029 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 3133EMBK7 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,484,640 0.45% 04/07/2025 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 3133EMER9 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,495,950 0.47% 01/27/2025 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 3133EMTQ5 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,091,717 0.71% 03/17/2025 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 3133ENAF7 1,235,150 1,250,000 1,179,250 1.06% 10/07/2026 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 3133ENHW3 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,231,075 1.19% 06/23/2025 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 3133EPN50 998,000 1,000,000 996,180 4.27% 12/15/2028 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 3133EPPR0 750,803 750,000 753,743 4.60% 04/10/2026 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 3134GW4C7 1,379,420 1,400,000 1,313,774 0.85% 10/27/2026 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 3134GWH82 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,463,235 0.64% 09/08/2025 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 3134GWWT9 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,459,260 0.57% 09/30/2025 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 3134GWZG4 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,942,080 0.62% 10/20/2025 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 3134GXAP9 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,453,305 0.62% 11/12/2025 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 3134GXBM5 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,453,305 0.62% 11/12/2025 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc 3136G4A45 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,470,225 0.72% 07/22/2025 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#AN1614 3138LDYL1 1,896,875 2,000,000 1,943,000 2.54% 06/01/2026 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BL4424 3140HV4J0 1,431,893 1,594,868 1,425,509 2.40% 10/01/2029 Pre 4 2rep n n

Page 6 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority US Bank Investments
For Period Ended
December 31,2024
Par Market Stated Maturity
Investment Name CUSIP Cost Value Value Rate Date Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BL3660 3140HVB60 1,874,917 1,987,325 1,828,558 2.95% 08/01/2029 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BS1416 3140LBSE4 594,825 660,000 594,172 1.21% 03/01/2028 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BS5506 3140LGDL3 772,922 825,000 770,996 3.32% 06/01/2029 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BS5552 3140LGE24 1,995,544 2,130,000 2,010,912 3.55% 05/01/2029 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BS8656 3140LKTN3 659,588 660,000 659,116 4.87% 06/01/2028 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BZ0815 3140NU3Z0 1,499,063 1,500,000 1,496,145 4.67% 04/01/2029 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BZ1806 3140NWAG0 1,463,438 1,500,000 1,455,690 4.18% 09/01/2029 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BZ1969A 3140NWFK6 689,719 700,000 677,817 4.15% 10/01/2029 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BA2127A 3140NWLH6 1,473,750 1,500,000 1,460,325 4.31% 10/01/2029 Government Securities Subtotal $ 68,136,002 $ 68,907,193 $ 66,795,537 US Treasury
US Treasury Note 2.625% 9128286B1 928,900 1,000,000 934,930 2.81% 02/15/2029 US Treasury Note 0.625% 912828ZE3 220,875 250,000 230,813 0.68% 03/31/2027 US Treasury Note 0.375% 91282CBC4 1,476,450 1,500,000 1,444,395 0.39% 12/31/2025 US Treasury Note 3.750% 91282CJR3 978,600 1,000,000 977,550 3.84% 12/31/2028 US Treasury Note 4.000% 91282CJW2 989,100 1,000,000 986,300 4.06% 01/31/2029 US Treasury Subtotal $ 4,593,925 $ 4,750,000 $ 4,573,988 Total Portfolio $ 102,085,480 $ 103,132,638 $ 100,635,398 Pregiyarnn

Page 7 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority Investment Portfolio
For Period Ended
December 31,2024
No.of
days until Days to maturity Total by
December 31,2024 Market Value Availability maturity Weight weighted average maturity Petty Cash 32,898 12/31/2024 0 0.0% - Checking Account 8,729,967 1/1/2025 1 6.6% 0.07 Utility&Credit Cards Account 311,369 1/1/2025 1 0.2% 0.00 Successor Agency 175,119 1/1/2025 1 0.1% - Total Bank Accounts 9,249,352 9,249,352 State Local Agency Investment Fund 1,286,657 1/1/2025 1 1.0% 0.01 1,286,657 California Asset Management Plan 21,436,959 12/31/2024 0 16.2% - 21,436,959 First American Govt OB Fund-Y 2,970,445 1/1/2025 1 2.2% 0.02 Money Market Accounts 2,970,445 2,970,445 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 1,495,950 1/27/2025 27 1.1% 0.30 Government Securities 1,495,950 1,495,950 Enerbank USA CD 249,498 1/29/2025 29 0.2% 0.05 Spokane Teachers CD 248,221 1/28/2025 28 0.2% 0.05 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 497,718 497,718 $ 36,937,081 1 -30 days
Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,491,210 2/28/2025 59 1.1% 0.66 Government Securities 1,491,210 1,491,210 General Electric CU CD 250,150 2/14/2025 45 0.2% 0.08 Merrick Bank CD 249,470 1/31/2025 31 0.2% 0.06 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 499,620 499,620 $ 1,990,830 31 -60 days
Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,091,145 3/24/2025 83 0.8% 0.68 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 1,484,640 4/7/2025 97 1.1% 1.09 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 1,091,717 3/17/2025 76 0.8% 0.63 Government Securities 3,667,502 3,667,502 1st Security Bank of Washington CD 247,095 4/16/2025 106 0.2% 0.20 Industrial Commercial Bank China CD 247,630 3/31/2025 90 0.2% 0.17 Medallion Bank CD 248,223 3/27/2025 86 0.2% 0.16 Partners Bank of California CD 247,910 4/2/2025 92 0.2% 0.17 Poppy Bank CD 227,415 3/18/2025 77 0.2% 0.13 Souther States Bank CD 249,120 4/14/2025 104 0.2% 0.20 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 1,467,392 1,467,392 $ 5,134,894 61 -120 days
Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 1,231,075 6/23/2025 174 0.9% 1.62 Government Securities 1,231,075 1,231,075 Connexus CU CD 251,153 6/23/2025 174 0.2% 0.33 Liberty FED CD 248,942 6/9/2025 160 0.2% 0.30 Southeast Bank CD 245,720 6/17/2025 168 0.2% 0.31 Tandem Bank CD 245,903 6/23/2025 174 0.2% 0.32 Third Federal Savings&Loan CD 246,663 5/23/2025 143 0.2% 0.27 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 1,238,380 1,238,380 $ 2,469,455 121-180 days
Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,458,540 12/30/2025 364 1.1% 4.00 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 983,350 6/30/2025 181 0.7% 1.34 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,455,660 12/22/2025 356 1.1% 3.91 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 1,463,235 9/8/2025 251 1.1% 2.77 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 1,459,260 9/30/2025 273 1.1% 3.00 Paged k8Dt?7fe705n

Page 8 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority Investment Portfolio
For Period Ended
December 31,2024
No.of
days until Days to maturity Total by
December 31,2024 Market Value Availability maturity Weight weighted average maturity Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 1,942,080 10/20/2025 293 1.5% 4.29 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 1,453,305 11/12/2025 316 1.1% 3.46 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 1,453,305 11/12/2025 316 1.1% 3.46 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc 1,470,225 7/22/2025 203 1.1% 2.25 Government Securities 13,138,960 13,138,960 Alabama CU CD 252,193 12/22/2025 356 0.2% 0.68 Ally Bank Utah CD 250,085 12/22/2025 356 0.2% 0.67 BMW Bank North America CD 243,505 9/25/2025 268 0.2% 0.49 California CD 253,078 10/27/2025 300 0.2% 0.57 Chartway FCU CD 250,135 12/16/2025 350 0.2% 0.66 First Carolina Bank CD 241,318 12/23/2025 357 0.2% 0.65 Greenstate CU CD 242,888 11/24/2025 328 0.2% 0.60 Ideal CU CD 124,883 8/29/2025 241 0.1% 0.23 JPMorgan Chase Bank CD 242,408 11/10/2025 314 0.2% 0.57 Live Oak Banking Company CD 243,728 9/16/2025 259 0.2% 0.48 Meritrust FCU MTN CD 223,922 6/30/2025 181 0.2% 0.31 New York Community Bank CD 245,458 7/1/2025 182 0.2% 0.34 Technology CU CD 248,084 7/21/2025 202 0.2% 0.38 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 3,061,682 3,061,682 US Treasury Note 0.375% 1,444,395 12/31/2025 365 1.1% 3.98 US Treasury 1,444,395 1,444,395
Klamath Trinity,CA-2021 B 14,764 8/1/2025 213 0.0% 0.02 San Bernardino,CA 294,120 8/1/2025 213 0.2% 0.47 Municipal Bonds 308,884 308,884
$ 17,953,921 181 -1 year
Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,925,920 1/28/2026 393 1.5% 5.71 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,918,500 2/12/2026 408 1.4% 5.90 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 962,070 2/26/2026 422 0.7% 3.06 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 961,390 2/26/2026 422 0.7% 3.06 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,269,970 4/29/2026 484 1.0% 4.64 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,453,455 5/12/2026 497 1.1% 5.45 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,943,740 5/27/2026 512 1.5% 7.50 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,427,730 7/20/2026 566 1.1% 6.09 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,515,280 10/26/2026 664 1.1% 7.59 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,417,095 11/24/2026 693 1.1% 7.41 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,947,500 11/24/2026 693 1.5% 10.18 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 1,179,250 10/7/2026 645 0.9% 5.74 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 753,743 4/10/2026 465 0.6% 2.64 Federal Home Ln Corp MTN 1,313,774 10/27/2026 665 1.0% 6.59 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#AN1614 1,943,000 6/1/2026 517 1.5% 7.58 Government Securities 21,932,417 21,932,417 A+FCU CD 251,638 2/17/2026 413 0.2% 0.78 American Equity Bank CD 238,465 5/27/2026 512 0.2% 0.92 BankUnited NA CD 236,677 12/8/2026 707 0.2% 1.26 Burke Herbert Finanical Services CD 249,070 2/13/2026 409 0.2% 0.77 Capital One NA CD 237,173 12/8/2026 707 0.2% 1.26 City National Bank CD 250,583 1/12/2026 377 0.2% 0.71 Clearpath FCU CD 250,088 4/27/2026 482 0.2% 0.91 Communitywide FCU CD 251,418 1/6/2026 371 0.2% 0.70 Connex CU CD 253,825 3/18/2026 442 0.2% 0.85 Continental Bank CD 236,325 8/24/2026 601 0.2% 1.07 Dort FCU CD 253,108 6/22/2026 538 0.2% 1.03 Empower FCU CD 256,160 10/23/2026 661 0.2% 1.28 FirstBank of Nebraska CD 234,298 8/27/2026 604 0.2% 1.07 Gesa CU CD 254,568 7/31/2026 577 0.2% 1.11 Global FCU CD 251,231 6/16/2026 532 0.2% 1.01 Malaga Bank CD 235,600 11/19/2026 688 0.2% 1.22 Milestone Bk CD 245,906 12/15/2026 714 0.2% 1.32 NBC Bancorp Inc CD 251,286 9/14/2026 622 0.2% 1.18 Popular Bank CD 249,955 1/8/2026 373 0.2% 0.70 Paged R9Dtffe705n

Page 9 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority Investment Portfolio
For Period Ended
December 31,2024
No.of
days until Days to maturity Total by
December 31,2024 Market Value Availability maturity Weight weighted average maturity Red Crown Fed CD 204,664 10/13/2026 651 0.2% 1.00 Solarity CU CD 251,460 6/23/2026 539 0.2% 1.02 Texas Exchange Bank CD 236,122 11/13/2026 682 0.2% 1.21 Toyota Financial Savings Bank CD 236,287 7/29/2026 575 0.2% 1.02 USAlliance FCU CD 97,091 1/28/2026 393 0.1% 0.29 Union Bank CD 239,618 3/19/2026 443 0.2% 0.80 Vibrant CU CD 251,683 3/20/2026 444 0.2% 0.84 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 6,204,294 6,204,294 Riverside Cnty,CA 981,700 2/15/2026 411 0.7% 3.04 San Bernardino,CA 238,048 8/1/2026 578 0.2% 1.04 Municipal Bonds 1,219,748 1,219,748
$ 29,356,458 1-2 years
Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 959,330 3/30/2027 819 0.7% 5.92 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 598,260 4/21/2027 841 0.5% 3.79 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 995,840 6/11/2027 892 0.8% 6.70 Government Securities 2,553,430 2,553,430 Baxter CU CD 252,418 1/25/2027 755 0.2% 1.44 Essential CU CD 254,015 6/15/2027 896 0.2% 1.72 1st Source Bank CD 249,940 1/19/2027 749 0.2% 1.41 First Technology FCU CD 246,796 8/5/2027 947 0.2% 1.76 Generations Bank C D 244,893 5/6/2027 856 0.2% 1.58 Iriquois Fed CD 253,447 9/17/2027 990 0.2% 1.89 Optum Bank Draper CD 248,260 9/13/2027 986 0.2% 1.85 People's Bank CD 250,155 1/12/2027 742 0.2% 1.40 Preferred CU CD 256,348 9/15/2027 988 0.2% 1.91 State Employees CD 253,475 5/24/2027 874 0.2% 1.67 True Sky Credit CD 253,363 11/30/2027 1064 0.2% 2.03 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 2,763,108 2,763,108 US Treasury Note 0.625% 230,813 3/31/2027 820 0.2% 1.43 US Treasury 230,813 230,813
$ 5,547,351 2-3 years
Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,500,345 2/16/2028 1142 1.1% 12.92 Federal Home Ln Bks DEB 1,999,200 9/8/2028 1347 1.5% 20.31 Federal Farm Credit Bks DEB 996,180 12/15/2028 1445 0.8% 10.86 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BS1416 594,172 3/1/2028 1156 0.4% 5.18 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BS8656 659,116 6/1/2028 1248 0.5% 6.20 Government Securities 5,749,012 5,749,012 American Exp CD 255,065 9/13/2028 1352 0.2% 2.60 Customers Bank CD 253,933 6/14/2028 1261 0.2% 2.41 Discover Bank CD 255,623 9/18/2028 1357 0.2% 2.62 Fahey Banking Co CD 249,260 1/12/2028 1107 0.2% 2.08 Gulf Cap Bank CD 246,681 9/27/2028 1366 0.2% 2.54 Jeanne D Arc CD 252,319 7/31/2028 1308 0.2% 2.49 Southern First CD 251,849 10/17/2028 1386 0.2% 2.63 TTCU Federal CU CD 258,275 7/26/2028 1303 0.2% 2.54 Tucson FCU CD 258,525 9/8/2028 1347 0.2% 2.63 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 2,281,529 2,281,529 $ 8,030,541 3-4 years
Fed Home Ln Mort Corp#WN1356 1,476,060 4/1/2029 1552 1.1% 17.28 Fed Home Ln Mort Corp#WN2560 993,350 1/1/2029 1462 0.7% 10.95 Fed Home Ln Mort Corp#WN5034F 1,940,620 7/1/2029 1643 1.5% 24.04 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BL4424 1,425,509 10/1/2029 1735 1.1% 18.65 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BL3660 1,828,558 8/1/2029 1674 1.4% 23.08 Paged 3Avfe705n

Page 10 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

Page 11 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority CA Government Code Section 53607
For Period Ended
December 31,2024
Issue Par Market Maturity
Investment Name CUSIP ID Date Cost Value Value Date Sales&Maturities
Arsenal CU CD 04288LAA6 1/20/2023 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,084.32 1/25/2025 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BL4424 3140HV4J0 10/1/2019 2,371.35 2,641.25 2,641.25 10/1/2029 Fed Natl Mortgage Assoc#BL3660 3140HVB60 8/1/2019 3,088.64 3,273.82 3,273.82 8/1/2029 Keypoint CU CD 49332PAC4 12/29/2023 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,128.96 12/27/2024 Manufacturers Traders Trust Co CD 564759RJ9 12/7/2022 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,024.40 12/9/2024 WebBank Salt CD 947547NT8 12/29/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00 247,260.96 12/30/2024 Sales&Maturities Subtotal $ 993,459.99 $ 993,915.07 $ 993,413.71 Prep e y92r n

Page 12 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority Maturities in Thousands of Dollars
For Period Ended
December 31, 2024
1 day 31 days 61 days 121 days 181 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years to to to to to to to to to
Investment Portfolio 30 days 60 days 120 days 180 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years State Local Agency Investment Fund 1,287 - - - - - - - - u
California Asset Management Plan 21,438 - - - - - - - - Bank Accounts and Change Funds 9,249 - - - - - - - - Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 498 501 1,467 1,238 3,062 6,204 2,763 2,282 2,902 Government Securities 1,496 1,491 3,668 1,231 13,139 21,932 2,553 5,749 15,536 Money Market Fund 2,970 - - - - - - - - Municipal Bonds - - - - 309 1,220 - - 3,851 US Treasury - - - - 1,444 - 231 - 2,899 Total Cash and Investments $36,938 $ 1,992 $ 5,135 $ 2,469 $ 17,954 $29,356 $ 5,547 $ 8,031 $25,188 tl i
Percentage 27.86% 1.50% 3.87% 1.86% 13.54% 22.14% 4.18% 6.06% 18.99%

INVESTMENTS BY MATURITY
2 years to 3 years

4.18%
1 year to 2 years -

22.14 3 years to 4 years

6.06%
181 days to 1 year

13.54%
121 days to 180
days 1.86% 4 years to 5 years

18.99%
61 days to 120
days 3.87%
\111.111.11111111.11.1.1....---
31 days to
60 days 1.50%
1 day to 30 days

27.86%
Prepin

Page 13 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority Bank Accounts and Change Funds
For Period Ended
December 31, 2024
Account Insured Collateralized Total
Name Institution Deposits Deposits Deposits
Petty Cash
City of Upland City of Upland $ - $ - $ 32,898 City of Upland
Payroll Zero Balance Account Chase - - - City of Upland
Checking Account Chase 250,000 8,479,967 8,729,967 City of Upland
Utility& Credit Cards Account Chase 250,000 61,369 311,369 City of Upland
Successor Agency Chase 175,119 - 175,119 Totals $ 675,119 $ 8,541,336 $ 9,249,352
Prepare0a�e grXe

Page 14 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC

TREASURER'S REPORT
City of Upland - Successor Agency - Public Financing Authority State Local Agency Investment Fund
For 12 Month Period Ended
December 31, 2024
Month Yield
January-2024 4.01%
February-2024 4.12%
March-2024 4.23%
April-2024 4.27%
May-2024 4.33%
June-2024 4.48%
July-2024 4.52%
August-2024 4.58%
September-2024 4.58%
October-2024 4.52%
November-2024 4.48%
December-2024 4.43%
Average Yield On Investment Portfolio

4.70%

4.60%

4.50%

4.40%

4.30%

4.20%

4.10% -

4.00% -

3.90% -

3.80% -

3.70% -
ti� ti� ti� ti� ti� tit.` ti� ti� ti� ti� ti� 1, y0 ti0 ,ti0 y0 LO ti0 LO LO ti0 0 ti0 0 vacJ oa �atr PQ�\ , ��e ��J ��yl ��et' eoe' �� e�NOet <<e o� e�
Prepare0a�e gre �

Page 15 of 16 ends

Docusign Envelope ID:657697D5-722A-42EA-914D-78B9088FC1BC January-2024 February-2024 March-2024 April-2024 May-2024 June-2024 July-2024 August-2024 September-2024 October-2024 November-2024 December-2024 Investment Portfolio
State Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF) 6,140,634 10,179,928 8,165,694 5,738,513 1,228,815 1,218,471 1,270,702 1,273,693 1,275,008 1,287,040 1,287,663 1,286,657 California Asset Management Plan(CAMP) 31,086,004 31,221,545 31,366,454 35,511,736 35,667,423 37,319,358 25,471,211 23,583,738 21,679,655 20,769,937 21,351,474 21,436,959 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 26,489,593 25,738,967 25,434,176 25,146,286 24,598,093 24,096,892 23,891,458 23,589,222 23,963,760 23,138,047 21,857,191 20,915,991 Money Market Fund 292,728 1,264,033 3,100,698 3,537,396 994,116 2,266,289 177,239 365,257 1,013,801 1,634,473 1,282,318 2,970,445 Municipal Bonds 1,534,972 1,529,703 1,533,303 1,527,597 1,531,768 1,533,372 3,587,504 3,573,166 3,616,265 5,398,155 5,418,081 5,379,438 Government Agency Securities 59,328,194 59,106,065 59,868,893 59,663,646 63,208,309 64,382,476 65,588,408 66,664,536 66,296,770 65,290,435 67,278,098 66,795,537 Corporate Bonds - - - - - - - - - - - - US Treasury 1,619,928 1,610,845 4,512,223 4,446,395 4,485,273 4,513,773 4,582,538 4,621,215 4,654,678 4,581,668 4,593,315 4,573,988 Total Investments $ 126,492,053 $ 130,651,085 $133,981,439 $135,571,569 $131,713,797 $135,330,631 $124,569,059 $123,670,828 $ 122,499,938 $ 122,099,754 $ 123,068,141 $ 123,359,014 Weighted Average Days to Maturity 491.11 459.24 483.70 461.83 471.80 499.32 572.63 593.57 624.20 625.11 644.59 587.03 Blended Yield: 3.05% 2.94% 3.14% 3.08% 3.02% 3.15% 3.07% 2.98% 3.02% 2.95% 2.90% 2.88% Cash
Bank Accounts and Change of Funds 8,280,241 7,286,941 5,023,019 5,167,174 13,970,016 8,130,947 7,113,239 3,277,829 2,544,190 1,698,628 4,126,869 9,249,352 Total Cash $ 8,280,241 $ 7,286,941 $ 5,023,019 $ 5,167,174 $ 13,970,016 $ 8,130,947 $ 7,113,239 $ 3,277,829 $ 2,544,190 $ 1,698,628 $ 4,126,869 $ 9,249,352 Total Cash and Investments $ 134,772,294 $ 137,938,026 $139,004,459 $140,738,742 $145,683,813 $143,461,577 $131,682,298 $126,948,657 $ 125,044,127 $ 123,798,382 $ 127,195,010 $ 132,608,367 PARS Investment Portfolio
115 Trust-OPEB Investment 1,877,569 1,898,632 1,936,964 2,184,493 2,247,348 2,272,555 2,321,327 2,360,733 2,392,170 2,340,868 2,395,435 2,344,893 115 Trust-Pension Investment 4,746,692 4,775,020 4,855,290 7,104,472 7,289,805 7,376,442 7,533,336 8,330,830 8,444,947 8,267,581 8,430,889 8,430,889 Total Restricted Funds Held in Trust $ 6,624,260 $ 6,673,652 $ 6,792,254 $ 9,288,965 $ 9,537,153 $ 9,648,997 $ 9,854,664 $ 10,691,564 $ 10,837,117 $ 10,608,449 $ 10,826,324 $ 10,775,782 Benchmarks:

LAIF 4.01% 4.12% 4.23% 4.27% 4.33% 4.48% 4.52% 4.58% 4.58% 4.52% 4.48% 4.43% CAMP 5.54% 5.50% 5.50% 5.45% 5.43% 5.44% 5.44% 5.42% 5.29% 5.01% 4.81% 4.65% 2yr U.S.Treasury 4.27% 4.64% 4.59% 5.04% 4.82% 4.71% 4.29% 3.91% 3.66% 4.16% 4.13% 4.25% Syr U.S.Treasury 3.91% 4.26% 4.21% 4.72% 4.42% 4.33% 3.97% 3.71% 3.58% 4.15% 4.05% 4.38% Restricted Funds with Fiscal Agent
Wtr Sys Lease Rev Ref Bonds 2011
Wtr Revenue Bonds 2022 15,501,369 15,501,435 15,636,280 15,501,562 15,501,626 15,501,692 15,501,755 15,501,821 16,516,671 15,501,951 15,502,017 15,502,081 Wtr Sys Lease Rev Ref Bonds 2021 25 25 48,773 0 - - - - 608,773 - - - Successor Agency TAN 2013/TAN 2016-Me 10 223,344 0 0 - - - 2,618,344 1 2 2 2 Colonies CFD Area#1 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - Colonies CFD Area#1 2022 585,595 1,311,297 1,122,204 1,122,209 1,122,212 1,122,216 1,122,219 1,497,100 294,865 294,866 294,866 294,866 ColoniesCFDArea#22015 1,526,975 2,236,488 2,010,387 2,010,393 2,010,404 2,010,413 2,010,421 2,429,242 1,328,142 1,328,148 1,328,153 1,328,159 Upland 54 CFD 2004 166,188 231,819 203,448 203,449 203,449 203,449 203,450 226,002 128,003 128,003 128,003 128,003 Sycamore Hills CFD 2015-1 737,762 1,006,794 824,056 824,059 824,060 824,061 824,062 1,115,102 744,257 744,257 744,258 744,258 Harvest at Upland CFD 2016-1 Area#1 581,045 912,960 743,629 746,634 749,547 752,572 755,509 914,107 574,419 576,659 578,762 580,730 Harvest at Upland CFD 2016-1 Area#2 2,289,347 2,583,777 2,435,366 2,435,376 2,435,384 2,435,392 2,435,400 2,568,647 2,156,897 2,156,904 2,156,911 2,156,917 4,055,265 4,145,681 4,062,915 4,078,970 4,094,517 4,110,632 4,126,259 4,160,128 4,078,287 4,093,130 4,107,462 4,120,735 Sycamore Hills CFD 2015-1-2 765,840 1,049,013 848,106 848,109 848,111 848,101 848,113 1,135,802 771,560 750,327 771,562 771,563 Total Restricted Funds $ 26,209,421 $ 29,202,632 $ 27,935,164 $ 27,770,761 $ 27,789,310 $ 27,808,528 $ 27,827,188 $ 32,166,295 $ 27,201,875 $ 25,574,247 $ 25,611,996 $ 25,627,314 9 Pager317eor i1 2025
Page i M�Chan

, trpl" CITY FUPLAND
"The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krcifil
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: January 27,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

STACI SULLIVAN,FINANCE MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF DECEMBER WARRANT AND PAYROLL REGISTERS RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the December warrant registers(check numbers 50905—51280 and direct disbursements totaling $9,367,264.93) and payroll registers totaling $1,966,287.76 (check numbers 164048 - 164062 and electronic fund transfers 51977—52547).

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of managing the City's resources in a fiscally responsible and transparent manner.

BACKGROUND
The City Council is presented with the financial disbursements for the purchase of materials,supplies,services,capital projects,and payroll warrants issued in the prior month. This process provides the City Council with the opportunity to review the monthly expenses of the city.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
In accordance with Government Code 37208,the Finance Manager hereby certifies that the attached warrant registers, direct disbursements and payroll registers have been found to conform to the approved budget and have been paid.

These demands are submitted to the City Council for review and approval.

FISCAL IMPACTS
Funds are available for the payment of the warrant registers,direct disbursements and payroll registers in accordance with the Fiscal Year 2024-25 operating budget.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project

Page 37 of 705 ends

OF Up City of Upland
`':;a ' :'d Accounts Payable Check Reconciliation Register ' � „ 12/01/2024-12/31/2024
CHECK# CHECK DATE CHECK TYPE VENDOR# VENDOR NAME CHECK AMOUNT 50905 12/04/2024 PRINTED 207 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL LLC 80.81 50906 12/04/2024 PRINTED 291 GOLDEN STATE SUPPLY,LLC 80.76 50907 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1380 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC 14,905.00 50908 12/04/2024 PRINTED 3 AIRGAS USA LLC 290.13 50909 12/04/2024 PRINTED 12564 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 9,755.10 50910 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1243 AMERICAN GLOBAL SECURITY, INC 12,450.81 50911 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1328 ARCOR ROOTER CORP 1,450.00 50912 12/04/2024 PRINTED 6683 ATMAA INC 1,400.00 50913 12/04/2024 PRINTED 715 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE INSPECTIONS,INC 1,607.16 50914 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1374 BAY ALARM COMPANY 686.00 50915 12/04/2024 PRINTED 119661 BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP 60,856.03 50916 12/04/2024 PRINTED 2005 BURKE,WILLIAMS&SORENSEN,LLP 5,720.00 50917 12/04/2024 PRINTED 5944 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 2,457,061.03 50918 12/04/2024 PRINTED 195 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 3,905.68 50919 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1951 CANTEEN REFRESHMENTS 1,271.16 50920 12/04/2024 PRINTED 177 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC 206.45 50921 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1624 CHARLES E HINCHCLIFFE 2,000.00 50922 12/04/2024 PRINTED 82791 CHEM PRO LLC 333.00 50923 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1755 CIVICA LAW GROUP,APC 15,000.00 50924 12/04/2024 PRINTED 15814 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN,LLC 1,800.00 50925 12/04/2024 PRINTED 125321 CROPPER ROWE,LLP 16,000.00 50926 12/04/2024 PRINTED 4696 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRIC 65.72 50927 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1727 MICHELLE DANISON 1,377.00 50928 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1801 DASH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,INC 9,502.79 50929 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1153 DENCO LIEN SALES,INC 1,960.00 50930 12/04/2024 PRINTED 124 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,391.00 50931 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1709 DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS,LLC 7,625.00 50932 12/04/2024 PRINTED 97141 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC 16,670.00 50933 12/04/2024 PRINTED 2435 EVERSOFT 549.26 50934 12/04/2024 PRINTED 4456 FEDERAL EXPRESS 66.38 50935 12/04/2024 PRINTED 96251 FORD OF UPLAND 814.55 50936 12/04/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 43.23 50937 12/04/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 164.78 50938 12/04/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 357.00 50939 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1603 GOLDEN STAR JANITORIAL INC 1,700.00 50940 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1458 GONZALEZ,HECTOR 3,500.00 50941 12/04/2024 PRINTED 16829 GOURMET GOURMET CATERING 545.22 50942 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1714 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 126.64 50943 12/04/2024 PRINTED 28871 GRAFFITI PROTECTIVE COATINGS 7,176.65 50944 12/04/2024 PRINTED 290 GRAINGER 2,049.21 50945 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1748 HALEY CONIGLIO 1,000.00 50946 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1212 HARDY&HARPER, INC 7,616.00 50947 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1842 HARPER&ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING,INC. 18,155.00 50948 12/04/2024 PRINTED 329 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 780.12 50949 12/04/2024 PRINTED 629 HONEYCOTT,INC 560.00 50950 12/04/2024 PRINTED 4495 HOSE-MAN INC 141.68 50951 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1333 HR GREEN PACIFIC 14,973.25 50952 12/04/2024 PRINTED 16340 INFOSEND INC 6,654.08 50953 12/04/2024 PRINTED 153 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 1,972.80 50954 12/04/2024 PRINTED 14657 INLAND VALLEY RECOVERY SVCS 1,035.00 50955 12/04/2024 PRINTED 2009 INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP 14,095.00 50956 12/04/2024 PRINTED 4719 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 109.90 Prepared by:Erin Myers Page 1 of 8 Page/g20f5705

CHECK# CHECK DATE CHECK TYPE VENDOR# VENDOR NAME CHECK AMOUNT 50957 12/04/2024 PRINTED 114501 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP 28,566.67 50958 12/04/2024 PRINTED 284 J G BAUTISTA CONSULTING 5,400.00 50959 12/04/2024 PRINTED 9463 JB'S POOLS&PONDS,INC 94.71 50960 12/04/2024 PRINTED 545 JEFF JENKINS SERVICE TECHNICIAN 1,960.00 50961 12/04/2024 PRINTED 841 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF UPLAND 16.14 50962 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1415 KEYSTONE RIDGE DESIGNS INC 49,997.00 50963 12/04/2024 PRINTED 15595 L D M ASSOCIATES INC 53,340.00 50964 12/04/2024 PRINTED 373 LA POLICE GEAR,INC. 206.61 50965 12/04/2024 PRINTED 102 LIGHTING INSTYLE 340.38 50966 12/04/2024 PRINTED 399 MADOLE&ASSOCIATES 20,765.00 50967 12/04/2024 PRINTED 16385 MAIN STREET SIGNS 3,142.88 50968 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1221 METRON FARNIER,LLC 350,890.00 50969 12/04/2024 PRINTED 5109 MR KEYS-AABOC-JACKS 906.58 50970 12/04/2024 PRINTED 203 MV CHENG&ASSOCIATE 13,543.75 50971 12/04/2024 PRINTED 117121 NUCKLES OIL COMPANY INC 59,223.13 50972 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1740 O-REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES,LLC 597.20 50973 12/04/2024 PRINTED 42771 OCCU-MED LTD 3,153.00 50974 12/04/2024 PRINTED 30971 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 1,074.00 50975 12/04/2024 PRINTED 923 ODYSSEY POWER CORPORATION 8,408.00 50976 12/04/2024 PRINTED 6625 P F SERVICES INC 6,257.33 50977 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1563 PROFESSIONAL POLYGRAPH SERVICES 1,000.00 50978 12/04/2024 PRINTED 909 PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTING ASSOCIATES INC 520.00 50979 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1731 R E S ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2,060.00 50980 12/04/2024 PRINTED 10638 RICHARDS,WATSON&GERSHON 3,660.44 50981 12/04/2024 PRINTED 67381 ROUTE 66 CAR WASH INC 529.00 50982 12/04/2024 PRINTED 3662 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS,INC 248.36 50983 12/04/2024 PRINTED 601 SAN ANTONIO WATER CO 2,736.51 50984 12/04/2024 PRINTED 606 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S 1,219.00 50985 12/04/2024 PRINTED 653 SAVANT SOLUTIONS INC 2,000.00 50986 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1616 SERVPRO TEAM BROGDON 14,257.72 50987 12/04/2024 PRINTED 507 SERVIAM BY WRIGHT LLP 3,906.40 50988 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1619 PATRICIA L SONTAG 1,475.75 50989 12/04/2024 PRINTED 637 SMART&FINAL IRIS CO 530.05 50990 12/04/2024 PRINTED 99141 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 1,211.23 50991 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1867 SOURCE GRAPHICS 1,764.58 50992 12/04/2024 PRINTED 124431 SPARLING INSTRUMENTS,LLC 475.23 50993 12/04/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 1,239.47 50994 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1608 STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS,LLC 7,588.79 50995 12/04/2024 PRINTED 16607 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 1,137.73 50996 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1156 T.R.L.SYSTEMS,INC 15,537.62 50997 12/04/2024 PRINTED 11583 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 2,093.23 50998 12/04/2024 PRINTED 990 VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA,INC 160.17 50999 12/04/2024 PRINTED 392 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,256.26 51000 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1725 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 58,872.00 51001 12/04/2024 PRINTED 1325 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 23,270.00 51002 12/04/2024 PRINTED 999999 CARLOS CESPEDES 500.00 51003 12/04/2024 PRINTED 999999 JORGE ESCANERO 50.00 51004 12/11/2024 PRINTED 303 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS,INC 720.00 51005 12/11/2024 PRINTED 99181 ACCOUNTEMPS 6,987.50 51006 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1645 ADVANCED HEALTHSTYLES FITNESS EQUIPMENT,INC 16,862.62 51007 12/11/2024 PRINTED 25 AGUILAR-RILEY,VIRGINIA 988.63 51008 12/11/2024 PRINTED 3 AIRGAS USA LLC 12.08 51009 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1937 DIANA L FRIELING 2,003.00 51010 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1396 ALVAREZ,MARIA ELENA 960.00 51011 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1291 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 1,276.26 51012 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1678 JOHN P ANDREWS 100.00 51013 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1328 ARCOR ROOTER CORP 3,141.95 Prepared by: Erin Myers Page 2 of 8 Page/+12Off5705

CHECK# CHECK DATE CHECK TYPE VENDOR# VENDOR NAME CHECK AMOUNT 51014 12/11/2024 PRINTED 289 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 246.27 51015 12/11/2024 PRINTED 2026 CLAUDIA LARISSA MUNOZ 880.00 51016 12/11/2024 PRINTED 308 ASPINALL,ROBIN JEAN 200.00 51017 12/11/2024 PRINTED 6683 ATMAA INC 1,390.00 51018 12/11/2024 PRINTED 3987 BALDY VIEW GYMNASTICS 1,901.20 51019 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1348 BAST,KAY 195.00 51020 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1734 BATTERY WORX INC 520.47 51021 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1569 BEARCOM COMMUNICATIONS,INC 123,257.95 51022 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1112 BEGINNERS EDGE SPORTS TRAINING,LLC 960.00 51023 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1519 BIG 0 FLOORING 19,381.78 51024 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1782 BLUE-WHITE INDUSTRIES 14,568.94 51025 12/11/2024 PRINTED 120021 BRIGHTVIEW 64,192.67 51026 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1503 BROWN AND CALDWELL 11,272.43 51027 12/11/2024 PRINTED 5944 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 1,223,012.13 51028 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1007 CALDWELL,CHRISTINE 200.00 51029 12/11/2024 PRINTED 195 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 5,340.65 51030 12/11/2024 PRINTED 84141 CARTY,DIANE 180.00 51031 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1812 CH DIAGNOSTIC&CONSULTING SERVICE,INC 565.00 51032 12/11/2024 PRINTED 3163 CHINO BASIN WATER 234,187.61 51033 12/11/2024 PRINTED 118781 CARD INTEGRATORS CORPORATION 321.71 51034 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1306 COMPLETE PAPERLESS SOLUTIONS 5,647.56 51035 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1962 ELIZABETH DALEY 13,728.00 51036 12/11/2024 PRINTED 401 DANIEL RODRIGUEZ 200.00 51037 12/11/2024 PRINTED 656 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE,INC 2,822.29 51038 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1863 DAVID L BORGER 200.00 51039 12/11/2024 PRINTED 16636 DELL MARKETING LP 7,029.62 51040 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1786 DRAGONFLY PUBLIC AFFAIRS 10,500.00 51041 12/11/2024 PRINTED 2027 KELLY DUONG 48.96 51042 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1587 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY&DISTRIBUTORS INC 2,285.04 51043 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1990 FASTLANE AUTO REPAIR INC 7,939.96 51044 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1000 FIX AUTO UPLAND 1,606.19 51045 12/11/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 660.00 51046 12/11/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 660.00 51047 12/11/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 139.26 51048 12/11/2024 PRINTED 58311 G H A TECHNOLOGIES 615.00 51049 12/11/2024 PRINTED 932 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 1,697.41 51050 12/11/2024 PRINTED 2017 JOHN A GILKEY 450.00 51051 12/11/2024 PRINTED 16829 GOURMET GOURMET CATERING 5,776.80 51052 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1748 HALEY CONIGLIO 2,295.00 51053 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1362 HALVORSON,TORIN 90.00 51054 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1842 HARPER&ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING,INC. 18,646.00 51055 12/11/2024 PRINTED 90227 HEARD'S INVESTIGATIONS AND POLYGRAPH,LLC 1,350.00 51056 12/11/2024 PRINTED 329 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 780.12 51057 12/11/2024 PRINTED 629 HONEYCOTT,INC 700.00 51058 12/11/2024 PRINTED 4495 HOSE-MAN INC 60.19 51059 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1604 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICES,LP 9,780.20 51060 12/11/2024 PRINTED 153 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 65,095.35 51061 12/11/2024 PRINTED 4137 INLAND FAIR HOUSING MEDIATION BOARD/FHMB 1,117.36 51062 12/11/2024 PRINTED 635 RENTOKIL NORTH AMERICA INC 1,844.28 51063 12/11/2024 PRINTED 59251 J&S STRIPING 6,488.94 51064 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1269 JOHNSON,JEFFREY 200.00 51065 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1802 KTUA 20,290.38 51066 12/11/2024 PRINTED 15595 L D M ASSOCIATES INC 2,413.50 51067 12/11/2024 PRINTED 3020 LAW ENFORCEMENT MEDICAL SVCS 3,165.00 51068 12/11/2024 PRINTED 102 LIGHTING INSTYLE 448.49 51069 12/11/2024 PRINTED 3013 MAYA QUINTERO 525.00 51070 12/11/2024 PRINTED 2023 LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY 2,817.81 Prepared by:Erin Myers Page 3 of 8 Pagef 2of5705

CHECK# CHECK DATE CHECK TYPE VENDOR# VENDOR NAME CHECK AMOUNT 51071 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1692 MONICA MARROQUIN 200.00 51072 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1221 METRON FARNIER,LLC 349,110.00 51073 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1409 MILLER,PATRICIA 102.68 51074 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1530 CHRISTINA LEACH 84.00 51075 12/11/2024 PRINTED 238 MOUNTAIN VIEW CHEVROLET,INC 225.00 51076 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1834 DEBORAH NAKATANI 351.00 51077 12/11/2024 PRINTED 14483 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 539.00 51078 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1581 OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT GROUP 30,450.00 51079 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1035 OTTER TRAINING AND CONSULTING SERVICES 450.00 51080 12/11/2024 PRINTED 6625 P F SERVICES INC 190.00 51081 12/11/2024 PRINTED 33021 PELLITTERI,CHRISTOPHER 446.60 51082 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1563 PROFESSIONAL POLYGRAPH SERVICES 500.00 51083 12/11/2024 PRINTED 349 RAIN MASTER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS 298.90 51084 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1864 REAL GONE PEST CONTROL 1,350.00 51085 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1209 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 400.00 51086 12/11/2024 PRINTED 612 RIDE ON POWERSPORTS,INC 38,706.60 51087 12/11/2024 PRINTED 67381 ROUTE 66 CAR WASH INC 529.00 51088 12/11/2024 PRINTED 90591 S&J SUPPLY CO INC 107,755.39 51089 12/11/2024 PRINTED 210 SALDANA DIAZ,NURYS E. 205.80 51090 12/11/2024 PRINTED 2010 MICHAEL SCHINLER 250.00 51091 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1237 VANESSA SEE 4,384.80 51092 12/11/2024 PRINTED 407 SINGLETON,DENICE 378.00 51093 12/11/2024 PRINTED 18062 SOFFA ELECTRIC INC 780.00 51094 12/11/2024 PRINTED 99141 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 2,830.19 51095 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1608 STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS,LLC 5,788.67 51096 12/11/2024 PRINTED 16607 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 302.75 51097 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1439 STATON,BRIAN 100.00 51098 12/11/2024 PRINTED 69231 STEP SAVER CA LLC 1,107.69 51099 12/11/2024 PRINTED 492 STEVE'S PROFESSIONAL GLASS TINTING&AUTO SECURITY 1,791.16 51100 12/11/2024 PRINTED 90177 SWRCB-DWSRF ACCOUNTING OFFICE 36,393.00 51101 12/11/2024 PRINTED 952 T TACTICAL SOLUTIONS,INC 4,622.48 51102 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1861 THREATER,INC 2,049.00 51103 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1347 TINKERSPACE,INC 75.60 51104 12/11/2024 PRINTED 62321 U.S.TELEPACIFIC CORP 1,434.02 51105 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1296 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS,INC 5,344.00 51106 12/11/2024 PRINTED 11484 U S BANK 2,000.00 51107 12/11/2024 PRINTED 17022 UPLAND MUSIC SCHOOL 616.00 51108 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1697 WATERWORKFORCE,INC 9,855.00 51109 12/11/2024 PRINTED 766 WEST END CONSOLIDATED WATER CO 63,243.06 51110 12/11/2024 PRINTED 14050 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 1,650.00 51111 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1946 WIRZ&COMPANY,INC 19,470.86 51112 12/11/2024 PRINTED 1994 WORDLY,INC 13,250.00 51113 12/11/2024 PRINTED 5193 ZAILO,ROBERT 418.95 51114 12/11/2024 PRINTED 999999 LEWIS GLEASON 152.25 51115 12/11/2024 PRINTED 999999 LEWIS GLEASON 97.72 51116 12/11/2024 PRINTED 999999 LEWIS GLEASON 117.71 51117 12/11/2024 PRINTED 999999 LIJUAN ZHANG 134.09 51118 12/11/2024 PRINTED 999999 PAVEMENT COASTINGS CO 830.40 51119 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1961 A PLUS VIEW LLC 225.00 51120 12/18/2024 PRINTED 99181 ACCOUNTEMPS 3,900.00 51121 12/18/2024 PRINTED 207 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL LLC 161.63 51122 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1646 ERIC BAUER 3,750.00 51123 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1243 AMERICAN GLOBAL SECURITY, INC 12,205.82 51124 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1729 ANTHESIS SERVICES 268.08 51125 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1374 BAY ALARM COMPANY 291.00 51126 12/18/2024 PRINTED 119661 BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP 52,869.72 51127 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1769 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 2,937.00 Prepared by:Erin Myers Page 4 of 8 Page/ '2Of5705

CHECK# CHECK DATE CHECK TYPE VENDOR# VENDOR NAME CHECK AMOUNT 51128 12/18/2024 PRINTED 2036 ISABEL BOLANOS 225.00 51129 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1479 MAP COMMUNICATIONS INC 277.53 51130 12/18/2024 PRINTED 2035 JENNIFER CERVANTES 225.00 51131 12/18/2024 PRINTED 448 CINTAS CORPORATION 3,352.00 51132 12/18/2024 PRINTED 475 CITY OF MONTCLAIR 279.93 51133 12/18/2024 PRINTED 521 COUPLAND,DONNA 216.00 51134 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1153 DENCO LIEN SALES,INC 160.00 51135 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1570 DIRECTV ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS LLC 156.99 51136 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1571 DOWNSTREAM SERVICES,INC 1,750.80 51137 12/18/2024 PRINTED 2027 KELLY DUONG 55.88 51138 12/18/2024 PRINTED 82651 ECONOLITE SYSTEMS,INC 8,368.55 51139 12/18/2024 PRINTED 73401 ERNIE'S DISCOUNT ROOTER 125.00 51140 12/18/2024 PRINTED 2435 EVERSOFT 2,046.75 51141 12/18/2024 PRINTED 10485 EXPERIAN 153.55 51142 12/18/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 94.12 51143 12/18/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 164.78 51144 12/18/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 577.50 51145 12/18/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 1,238.52 51146 12/18/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 1,938.37 51147 12/18/2024 PRINTED 111251 GNA BROOK FIRE PROTECTION INC 7,884.76 51148 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1938 GUARANTEED JANITORIAL SERVICE,INC. 7,567.92 51149 12/18/2024 PRINTED 329 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 390.06 51150 12/18/2024 PRINTED 15090 HOLLIDAY TRUCKING INC 5,363.49 51151 12/18/2024 PRINTED 16340 INFOSEND INC 5,702.99 51152 12/18/2024 PRINTED 3430 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES,LTD 2,123.55 51153 12/18/2024 PRINTED 153 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 138,622.85 51154 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14657 INLAND VALLEY RECOVERY SVCS 3,530.00 51155 12/18/2024 PRINTED 114501 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP 20,472.40 51156 12/18/2024 PRINTED 545 JEFF JENKINS SERVICE TECHNICIAN 985.00 51157 12/18/2024 PRINTED 2022 TROY NEALLY 3,000.00 51158 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1969 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC 10,418.61 51159 12/18/2024 PRINTED 15595 L D M ASSOCIATES INC 30,181.25 51160 12/18/2024 PRINTED 2018 LOVE AIRE HEATING AND COOLING 9,995.00 51161 12/18/2024 PRINTED 16385 MAIN STREET SIGNS 43.45 51162 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1622 SHANNAN MAUST 1,160.66 51163 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1512 NOTCHICK,JOSEPH 190.00 51164 12/18/2024 PRINTED 788 0 F WOLFINBARGER INC 152.25 51165 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1601 PARKER,STEPHEN 506.28 51166 12/18/2024 PRINTED 992 PRISTINE UNIFORMS,LLC 5,013.89 51167 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1563 PROFESSIONAL POLYGRAPH SERVICES 250.00 51168 12/18/2024 PRINTED 17563 GARALITO,KIMBERLY 3,645.12 51169 12/18/2024 PRINTED 2021 PROTERRA BUILDERS INC 33,487.49 51170 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1528 RISE INTERPRETING,INC 1,400.00 51171 12/18/2024 PRINTED 67381 ROUTE 66 CAR WASH INC 738.00 51172 12/18/2024 PRINTED 969 HECTOR SALCIDO 145.00 51173 12/18/2024 PRINTED 601 SAN ANTONIO WATER CO 267,987.56 51174 12/18/2024 PRINTED 11671 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 14,398.36 51175 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1947 SHOETERIA INC 164.85 51176 12/18/2024 PRINTED 131121 SHRED-IT USA JV LLC 1,057.74 51177 12/18/2024 PRINTED 43011 SMITH-EMERY LABORATORIES 736.70 51178 12/18/2024 PRINTED 18062 SOFFA ELECTRIC INC 20,219.00 51179 12/18/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 669.00 51180 12/18/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 671.38 51181 12/18/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 144.98 51182 12/18/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 142.67 51183 12/18/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 1,061.41 51184 12/18/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 149.98 Prepared by:Erin Myers Page 5 of 8 Pagef 2of5705

CHECK# CHECK DATE CHECK TYPE VENDOR# VENDOR NAME CHECK AMOUNT 51185 12/18/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 134.98 51186 12/18/2024 PRINTED 21671 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS,LLC 219.11 51187 12/18/2024 PRINTED 9325 ST JOSEPH CHURCH 4,097.97 51188 12/18/2024 PRINTED 16607 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 328.61 51189 12/18/2024 PRINTED 90177 SWRCB 25,676.00 51190 12/18/2024 PRINTED 11583 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 4,388.57 51191 12/18/2024 PRINTED 626 TMP ENTERPRISES,LLC 200.00 51192 12/18/2024 PRINTED 62321 U.S.TELEPACIFIC CORP 2,561.08 51193 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1296 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS,INC 370.00 51194 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 7,388.29 51195 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 2,162.48 51196 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 2,372.09 51197 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 849.57 51198 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,000.67 51199 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 520.21 51200 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 80.02 51201 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 40.01 51202 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 287.87 51203 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 280.07 51204 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 124.71 51205 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 120.03 51206 12/18/2024 PRINTED 14735 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,268.66 51207 12/18/2024 PRINTED 776 VISTA PAINT CORP 111.84 51208 12/18/2024 PRINTED 1174 WAVECREST COMPUTING INC 2,480.00 51209 12/18/2024 PRINTED 392 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 69.63 51210 12/18/2024 PRINTED 999999 TESLA ENERGY 222.40 51211 12/18/2024 PRINTED 999999 UNGER LING 100.00 51212 12/24/2024 PRINTED 73931 4IMPRINT 455.56 51213 12/24/2024 PRINTED 99181 ACCOUNTEMPS 1,950.00 51214 12/24/2024 PRINTED 12564 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 9,755.10 51215 12/24/2024 PRINTED 6109 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE INS CO 186.18 51216 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1729 ANTHESIS SERVICES 7,500.00 51217 12/24/2024 PRINTED 715 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE INSPECTIONS,INC 74.00 51218 12/24/2024 PRINTED 862 BADGER METER INC 6,335.71 51219 12/24/2024 PRINTED 120021 BRIGHTVIEW 10,889.00 51220 12/24/2024 PRINTED 819 BRINKS,INC 1,115.88 51221 12/24/2024 PRINTED 2005 BURKE,WILLIAMS&SORENSEN,LLP 118.60 51222 12/24/2024 PRINTED 112 C P CONSTRUCTION CO 6,500.00 51223 12/24/2024 PRINTED 12511 CALIFORNIA COMPUTER SCHOOLS 125.00 51224 12/24/2024 PRINTED 448 CINTAS CORPORATION 1,653.46 51225 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1755 CIVICA LAW GROUP,APC 18,948.42 51226 12/24/2024 PRINTED 163 CLINICAL LABORATORY OF SAN BERNARDINO,INC 315.00 51227 12/24/2024 PRINTED 69831 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC HEALTH, 7,407.00 51228 12/24/2024 PRINTED 4696 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRIC 89.83 51229 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1385 DAVID TAUSSIG&ASSOCIATES,INC. 12,190.05 51230 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1153 DENCO LIEN SALES,INC 345.00 51231 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1537 DOCUSIGN,INC 1,725.00 51232 12/24/2024 PRINTED 4456 FEDERAL EXPRESS 8.78 51233 12/24/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 43.23 51234 12/24/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 810.61 51235 12/24/2024 PRINTED 78 FRONTIER 660.00 51236 12/24/2024 PRINTED 290 GRAINGER 333.60 51237 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1978 GUIDA 4,497.75 51238 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1941 HASA INC 2,472.78 51239 12/24/2024 PRINTED 56561 HLP INC 13,980.00 51240 12/24/2024 PRINTED 329 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 4,299.62 51241 12/24/2024 PRINTED 629 HONEYCOTT,INC 140.00 Prepared by:Erin Myers Page 6 of 8 Page/ 20f5705

CHECK# CHECK DATE CHECK TYPE VENDOR# VENDOR NAME CHECK AMOUNT 51242 12/24/2024 PRINTED 16340 INFOSEND INC 1,397.48 51243 12/24/2024 PRINTED 36271 INLAND EMPIRE PRINTING 175.09 51244 12/24/2024 PRINTED 3430 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES,LTD 4,839.13 51245 12/24/2024 PRINTED 106951 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY 1,149.58 51246 12/24/2024 PRINTED 63221 J C I JONES CHEMICALS INC 5,188.60 51247 12/24/2024 PRINTED 2029 CHARLES KWON 21.44 51248 12/24/2024 PRINTED 102 LIGHTING INSTYLE 46.40 51249 12/24/2024 PRINTED 2023 LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY 1,455.86 51250 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1845 LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS INC 4,765.00 51251 12/24/2024 PRINTED 16385 MAIN STREET SIGNS 6,089.46 51252 12/24/2024 PRINTED 2030 MASTERMINDS CREATIVE EVENTS INC 1,700.00 51253 12/24/2024 PRINTED 203 MV CHENG&ASSOCIATE 18,671.25 51254 12/24/2024 PRINTED 16877 NEXTDAY DELIVERY SERVICE,INC 266.35 51255 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1512 NOTCHICK,JOSEPH 399.99 51256 12/24/2024 PRINTED 117121 NUCKLES OIL COMPANY INC 26,932.26 51257 12/24/2024 PRINTED 788 0 F WOLFINBARGER INC 152.25 51258 12/24/2024 PRINTED 30971 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 50.00 51259 12/24/2024 PRINTED 999 PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES,LLC 679.35 51260 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1864 REAL GONE PEST CONTROL 280.00 51261 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1967 ROCK HONDA 33,771.34 51262 12/24/2024 PRINTED 67381 ROUTE 66 CAR WASH INC 529.00 51263 12/24/2024 PRINTED 90591 S&J SUPPLY CO INC 11,836.86 51264 12/24/2024 PRINTED 507 SERVIAM BY WRIGHT LLP 4,761.60 51265 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1608 STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS,LLC 1,807.20 51266 12/24/2024 PRINTED 16607 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 509.35 51267 12/24/2024 PRINTED 417 E&S TOWING ENTERPRISES,INC 2,585.00 51268 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1777 TELEGRAPH AVENUE ADVISORS,LLC 5,000.00 51269 12/24/2024 PRINTED 4463 NANCY K BOHL INC 2,000.00 51270 12/24/2024 PRINTED 99981 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST PAYMENT CENTER 1,790.54 51271 12/24/2024 PRINTED 88301 TSR CONSTRUCTION 23,400.00 51272 12/24/2024 PRINTED 3557 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1,027.79 51273 12/24/2024 PRINTED 62571 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE LTD. 378.52 51274 12/24/2024 PRINTED 4481 V C A CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 277.09 51275 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1653 MARIA E WALWORTH 250.00 51276 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1725 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 64,662.00 51277 12/24/2024 PRINTED 1005 WESTERN ALLIED CORP 501.10 51278 12/24/2024 PRINTED 14050 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 4,723.00 51279 12/24/2024 PRINTED 999999 MELANIE KIRK 889.21 51280 12/24/2024 PRINTED 999999 YURAYKA GALINDO 22.99 PRINTED CHECKS(376 COUNT) $ 7,239,869.51
120324000 12/03/2024 MANUAL 32091 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 12,087.56 120324001 12/03/2024 MANUAL 43651 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSN 69,192.03 120424000 12/04/2024 MANUAL 1589 LIVELY INC 2,468.91 120624000 12/06/2024 MANUAL 543 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,225.76 121024000 12/10/2024 MANUAL 65181 CALPERS 222,926.36 121324000 12/13/2024 MANUAL 441 MIDAMERICAADMIN&RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS,LLC 32,738.80 121324001 12/13/2024 MANUAL 1845 LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS INC 35,937.79 121324002 12/13/2024 MANUAL 153 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 663,193.24 121324003 12/13/2024 MANUAL 441 MIDAMERICAADMIN&RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS,LLC 1,218.37 121324004 12/13/2024 MANUAL 621 KAREN LONG 187.50 121324005 12/13/2024 MANUAL 736 UPLAND POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSN 1,072.00 121324006 12/13/2024 MANUAL 737 UPLAND POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 5,295.00 121324007 12/13/2024 MANUAL 125761 CITY EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATES 384.00 121324008 12/13/2024 MANUAL 1597 TRUSTMARK VOLUNTARY BENEFIT ADMINISTRATOR 2,474.01 121324009 12/13/2024 MANUAL 1594 COBRA PROFESSIONALS,INC 1,998.70 121324010 12/13/2024 MANUAL 618 ICMA-RC 1,675.00 Prepared by:Erin Myers Page 7 of 8 Page/ 2015705

CHECK# CHECK DATE CHECK TYPE VENDOR# VENDOR NAME CHECK AMOUNT 121624000 12/16/2024 MANUAL 1499 EMPOWER TRUST COMPANY,LLC 62,426.35 121624001 12/16/2024 MANUAL 624 DEPT OF THE TREASURY 100.00 121824000 12/18/2024 MANUAL 1589 LIVELY INC 2,431.34 121824001 12/18/2024 MANUAL 32091 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 254,851.43 122324000 12/23/2024 MANUAL 116231 NEOPOST USA INC 5,000.00 122424000 12/24/2024 MANUAL 126761 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS 8,217.02 122424001 12/24/2024 MANUAL 754 PUBLIC AGENCY COALITION ENTERPRISE 117,508.27 122424002 12/24/2024 MANUAL 760 WATER FACILITIES AUTHORITY 273,172.91 122424003 12/24/2024 MANUAL 91491 LIBRARY SYSTEMS&SERVICES LLC 121,301.00 122424004 12/24/2024 MANUAL 1841 PURSUIT 360 STRATEGIES LLC 6,000.00 122424005 12/24/2024 MANUAL 1841 PURSUIT 360 STRATEGIES LLC 6,000.00 122424006 12/24/2024 MANUAL 1841 PURSUIT 360 STRATEGIES LLC 6,000.00 122424007 12/24/2024 MANUAL 960 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POOL 27,837.36 122424008 12/24/2024 MANUAL 1282 WESTERN ALLIANCE BUSINESS TRUST 85,812.15 122424009 12/24/2024 MANUAL 114711 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO 1,636.44 122431001 12/24/2024 MANUAL 1337 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 2,992.02 122624001 12/26/2024 MANUAL 65181 CALPERS 20,967.24 122624002 12/26/2024 MANUAL 1594 COBRA PROFESSIONALS,INC 1,998.70 122624003 12/26/2024 MANUAL 125761 CITY EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATES 384.00 122624004 12/26/2024 MANUAL 736 UPLAND POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSN 1,072.00 122624005 12/26/2024 MANUAL 441 MIDAMERICA ADMIN&RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS,LLC 2,353.56 122624006 12/26/2024 MANUAL 618 ICMA-RC 1,675.00 122624007 12/26/2024 MANUAL 621 KAREN LONG 187.50 122624008 12/26/2024 MANUAL 624 DEPT OF THE TREASURY 100.00 122624009 12/26/2024 MANUAL 737 UPLAND POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 5,388.00 122724000 12/27/2024 MANUAL 1499 EMPOWER TRUST COMPANY,LLC 68,255.42 MANUAL CHECKS(42 COUNT) $ 2,138,742.74
50067 09/25/2024 VOID 1563 PROFESSIONAL POLYGRAPH SERVICES (250.00) 50295 10/16/2024 VOID 195 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP (387.32) 50586 11/06/2024 VOID 128 FORTIER,NURIA (210.00) 50838 11/27/2024 VOID 1786 DRAGONFLY PUBLIC AFFAIRS (10,500.00) VOID CHECKS(4 COUNT) $ (11,347.32)
PRINTED CHECKS(376 COUNT) $ 7,239,869.51
MANUAL CHECKS(42 COUNT) $ 2,138,742.74
VOID CHECKS(4 COUNT) $ (11,347.32)
PRINTED&MANUAL CHECK TOTALS $ 9,367,264.93
Prepared by:Erin Myers Page 8 of 8 Page/ 20f5705

OF UA,
( 4
� - -
` '_
rq CITY OF UPLAND
�.' `
..
{
r . :4 Payroll Costs
b . _ S�
4ZIFU
Payroll
11/24/2024 Through 12/07/2024 Check Date: 12/12/2024 Checks $9,421.19
Manual Checks $0.00
Void Checks
Direct Deposit $733,292.55
Manual Direct Deposit
Void Direct Deposit
$742,713.74 I
Taxes
11/24/2024 Through 12/07/2024 Check Date: 12/12/2024 Federal 142,940.02
State 44,551.33
$ 187,491.35I
Prepared by: Yesica Montoya
$ 930,205.09

Page 46 of 705 ends

or Via
gfr ` ""eiL CITY OF UPLAND
Payroll Costs
Payroll
12/08/2024 Through 12/21/2024 Check Date: 12/26/2024 Checks $4,803.44
Manual Checks $0.00
Void Checks
Direct Deposit $806,025.05
Manual Direct Deposit
Void Direct Deposit
$810,828.49 I
Taxes
12/08/2024 Through 12/21/2024 Check Date: 12/26/2024 Federal 171,699.76
State 53,554.42
$ 225,254.18I
Prepared by: Yesica Montoya
$ 1,036,082.67

Page 47 of 705 ends

trpl" CITY FUPLAND
"The City of Gracious Living"
Stafif(krcifil
C�tIFOB�S
DATE: January 27,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

STACEY PADRON,EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION TO EXECUTE AND FILE APPLICATION FOR

EMERGENCY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND GRANT PROGRAMS WITH CALOES RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution to execute an application on behalf of the City of Upland and to file it with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of pursuing grant funding to supplement local funding sources and exercise fiscal management of the City's funds.

BACKGROUND
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Hazard Mitigation Branch administers the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) to fund plans and projects that provide an opportunity for communities to implement mitigation activities to reduce risk to life and property from natural hazards. In California, natural hazards include wildfire,earthquake,drought,extreme weather,flooding,and other impacts of climate change.

In November 2021,HMPG released a notice of funding opportunity as a result of the Presidential Disaster Declaration.

On March 31, 2022,the City applied for$112,500 in federal funding from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program to support the City's efforts to update its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

On November 21,2023,the City was awarded with$85,427.91 for the Fiscal Year 2023-24 grant cycle. On May 13, 2024,the City Council accepted the CalOES Hazard Mitigation Grant Program award of$85,427.91.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The City is required under laws of the State of California to file an application with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance. The proposed Resolution authorizes the City Manager,Assistant City Manager,or Finance Manager to file an application with CalOES for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance for any existing or future grant program for a period of three years.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA.The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus,is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
Any funds received from the CalOES Hazard Mitigation Grant will be appropriated in Other Grants Fund 217 under Project No.42031.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

Page 48 of 705 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA, TO EXECUTE FOR AND ON BEHALF

OF CITY OF UPLAND THIS APPLICATION AND TO FILE IT

WITH THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF

EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING

FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR ANY EXISTING OR

FUTURE GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, is required to file an application with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance for any existing or future grant program, including, but not limited to any of the following:
• Federally declared Disaster (DR), Fire Mitigation Assistance Grant (FMAG),California State Only Disaster (CDAA), Immediate Services Program (ISP), Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC), Legislative Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (LPDM), under
• Public Law 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act.
• Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA), under Section 1366 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968.
• National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) 42 U.S. Code 7704 (b)((2) (A) (ix) and 42 U.S. Code 7704 (b) (2) (B) National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, and also The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, Div.

F, Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-141
• California Early Earthquake Warning (CEEW) under CA Gov Code - Gov, Title 2,Div. 1, Chapter 7, Article 5, Sections 8587.8, 8587.11, 8587.12; and WHEREAS, the Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution for Non-State Agencies is required of all Applicants to be eligible to receive funding.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Upland hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. That the City of Upland, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes the City Manager, Assistant City Manager and Finance Manager to provide to the Governor's Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required.

Section 3. This is a universal resolution and is effective for all open and future disasters/grants declared up to three (3) years following the date of approval.

Page 49 of 705 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 ends

Section 4. The City Council finds that this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Further, if the activity is deemed a project this City Council finds that this Resolution is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 2025.

Bill Velto, Mayor
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 27th day of January, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

Page 50 of 705 ends

4��a �p19� CI FUPLAND
�5, _�� "The City of Gracious Living"
C,,tIFOB,S
'• Stafif(krctilt
_,
DATE: January 27,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:ROBERT DALQUEST,COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

ALAN FRENCH,PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR CUP 99-03 (WALGREENS),LOCATED AT 1241 WEST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the Encroachment License Agreement for Conditional Use Permit 99-03 located at 1241 W. Foothill Boulevard; and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the agreement.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of collaboration with private enterprises to form successful partnerships and establish equitable projects without impacts to the City or its residents and to adhere to a review schedule for the processing of development proposals in an efficient,professionally responsive,and courteous manner.

BACKGROUND
In compliance with conditions of approval for CUP 99-03 (Walgreens), which was approved by the Planning Commission in the late 1990s,the property owner was allowed to encroach into the right-of-way to install landscaping and parking improvements as part of developing the site with a new Walgreens,subject to executing an Encroachment Agreement. The improvements were installed and have been maintained by the owner in compliance with the conditions of approval and the current Encroachment License Agreement.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The current property owner is selling the property and has entered into escrow with a buyer.The typical encroachment agreements are transferable and can pass from one property owner to their heirs and assigns but the new property owner wanted some edits to the agreement which included termination notices, terms and time limits. The City Attorney has been working with the buyer's attorney to include these changes in the agreement.

The attached agreement is the result of multiple staff meetings and discussions as well as meetings with the buyer and their legal counsel. The City Attorney has signed off on the changes. The agreement exhibits are provided as attachments to this staff report.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative directions to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

Page 51 of 705 ends

RECORDING REQUESTED BY )
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:)
Keri Johnson )
City Clerk )
City of Upland )
460 N. Euclid Avenue )
Upland,CA 91786 )
)

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE

ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT
The CITY OF UPLAND,a California municipal corporation(the"City"),hereby grants a perpetual license on the conditions and terms stated below(the"License")to CARDINAL GREEN INVESTMENTS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(the "CG"), and to WALGREEN, CO., an Illinois corporation ("Walgreen",together with CG and each of their respective successors, assigns,tenants or subtenants, and invitees,collectively,jointly and severally,as the"Licensee")for the purposes hereinafter described,in that certain real property owned by the City as hereinafter described, and on the covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, for the use and benefit of Licensee, and in consideration thereof, Licensee agrees to comply with all terms and conditions set forth in this Encroachment License Agreement (this "License Agreement").

1. Property. CG is the owner of the real property identified and described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Licensee's Property") and Walgreen is the current lessee of Licensee's Property pursuant to that certain Ground Lease dated August 21, 2001 by and between Walgreen and CG. City is the owner of the real property identified and described in Exhibit"B" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference ("City Property", also referred to as the"Encroachment Area").

2. Encroachment. Subject to City's rights in Section 3(g) below, City hereby licenses to Licensee the perpetual right to construct,use,maintain,repair,replace, and relocate the following items of encroachment (the "Encroachment Improvements") within the Encroachment Area: monument sign(s), parking improvements such as paving,striping,walkways,curbs,gutters,signage,utility facilities,utilities, transformers,light fixtures,landscaping, and other improvements as shown and/or described on(a)the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit"C" and incorporated herein by this reference; and(b) Site Plan SP-99-03 and Street Vacation SV-99-01, both on file in the City's Community Development Department (the "Encroachment Area").

3. Conditions of License. Licensee shall comply with all of the following conditions of approval for the License:
a. Licensee shall not maintain, commit or permit on the Encroachment Area the maintenance or commission of any nuisance, as now or hereafter defined by any statutory or decisional law. Licensee,at Licensee's sole expense,will timely obtain and comply with any license, permit, approval, consent, certificate, ruling, variance, authorization, conditional use permit, or amendment to any of the foregoing, as shall be necessary or appropriate under any law to perform any activities of Licensee required or allowed on the City Property pursuant to this Agreement. Licensee acknowledges and understands that nothing contained in this License Agreement shall be construed as City's approval or waiver of any entitlements, permits, consents, variance, or other authorization by City acting in its regulatory capacity. Licensee agrees to use the License and maintain the Encroachment 1 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 52 of 705 ends

Area and Encroachment Improvements in accordance with all applicable laws,ordinances and regulations of any applicable governmental authority, including environmental laws.

Except in compliance with all laws in the ordinary course of a retail business operation, Licensee shall not cause or permit to be placed on the Encroachment Area any Hazardous Substance. For the purposes of this License Agreement, "Hazardous Substance" shall mean, any flammable substance, explosive, radioactive material, asbestos, asbestos- containing material, polychlorinated biphenyl, chemical known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity, pollutant, contaminant, hazardous waste, medical waste, toxic substance or related material,explosive,petroleum,petroleum product or any"hazardous" or "toxic" material, substance or waste that is defined by those or similar terms or is regulated as such under any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation. b. Licensee agrees to maintain the Encroachment Area and Encroachment Improvements at all times in a good, safe, and sound condition, for maintenance,repair and/or construction in the Encroachment Area at Licensee's sole cost and expense, excepting therefrom City's activities exercised pursuant to paragraph(e),below.
c. Licensee shall defend, indemnify,protect, and hold City, its elected officials, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from, and pay in full, any and all claims, proceedings, demands, losses, causes of action, liability, judgments, arbitration awards, settlements, orders, penalties, damages, costs or expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees) that City may sustain or incur in any manner resulting from the Licensee's use of the Encroachment Area (whether the construction, installation,removal,maintenance,use,repair,replacement or presence thereof),including any and claims for all injuries (including personal injury, disability, dismemberment and death) of persons (Licensee's employees included), illness, losses, loss of or damage to property, damages, claims, liabilities or expenses of any kind or nature to any person that is not caused by the negligent acts or omissions of City or its agents or employees.Licensee will ensure that its use of the Encroachment Area is safe and compliant with all applicable codes.Licensee's indemnification obligations shall survive the termination of this License Agreement.
d. Licensee shall maintain a policy of liability insurance issued by an insurance company that is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and that is rated A:VIII or better according to the most recent A.M.Best Co.Rating Guide,with City,and its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees named as additional insured, that has an aggregate liability limit (subject to commercially reasonable adjustments) of at least Two Million Dollars ($2,000.000) and a per occurrence liability limit of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000.000)and that will protect City from any claims that may arise from the Licensee's use of the Encroachment Area, including those for which Licensee is obligated to indemnify City against hereunder.However,if the Licensee is self-insured for the same or greater liability amounts as specified about relative to aggregate and per occurrence then Licensee shall not be required to obtain a third party policy of self-insurance. e. Licensee's right to use and maintain the Encroachment Area is subject to City's right to cause construction, installation,removal, maintenance, repair and/or replacement work to be conducted in the Encroachment Area, as may be necessary from time to time,provided that City shall give reasonable prior notice to Licensee of the commencement of such work and shall use its best efforts to not unreasonably interfere with the Encroachment Area or Encroachment Improvements during the performance of such work,and,except in the case of an emergency,shall use best efforts to not perform work during the months of November or December.
2 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 53 of 705 ends

f. Except where this License Agreement is terminated under Section 3(g)below,the License Agreement shall be transferable and assignable by Licensee to a purchaser or successor fee owner of the Licensee's Property with City's prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld,delayed or conditioned. This License Agreement,and such consent shall be deemed given if City shall not object in writing within thirty(30)days from receipt of Licensee's notice of intent to transfer the License to a new Licensee. This License shall remain in full force and effect upon the transfer of the Encroachment Area by City to any other person or entity.
g. Subject to City's right to terminate the License Agreement set forth below, the License Agreement shall run with Licensee's Property in perpetuity, commencing on the date this Encroachment License Agreement is recorded in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California. This License may only be terminated, in whole or part, without compensation to Licensee,by City for the purposes of utilizing the Encroachment Area for a public purpose,provided City shall endeavor to give Licensee not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior written notice of such termination. In the event City terminates this License pursuant to the terms of this paragraph (g), Licensee shall have the right to relocate the Encroachment Improvements onto Licensee's Property. Subject to the approval of City Council,the City shall provide a variance or other approvals required for Licensee to relocate the Encroachment Improvements. In addition to and without limiting the forgoing,if the conditional use permit issued to Licensee's Property is ever terminated or revoked,this License Agreement shall automatically terminate. h. If any claim or lien is recorded or asserted against the Encroachment Area or the City for materials supplied or labor of professional services performed directly or indirectly for Licensee or any contractor of Licensee relating to construction, demolition, maintenance, removal or other work on the Encroachment Area, Licensee shall satisfy and discharge such lien, at the sole cost and expense of Licensee, within thirty (30) calendar days following notice of the existence or assertion of such claim or lien.Notice is hereby given that City shall not be liable for any labor or materials furnished or to be furnished to Licensee or Licensee's contractors upon credit and that no mechanic's or other lien for any labor or materials shall attach to or affect the City Property. Nothing in this License Agreement shall be deemed or construed in any way to constitute City's consent or request, express or implied, by inference or otherwise, to any contractor, subcontractor, laborer, equipment or material supplier for the performance of any labor or the furnishing of any materials or equipment for any construction,nor as giving Licensee any right or power to contract for,or permit the rendering of,any services,or the furnishing of any materials that would give rise to the filing of any liens against the City Property. i. Upon the termination of this License Agreement, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly, safely and carefully restore the City Property to its condition on the Effective Date of this Agreement and shall remove: (a) all personal property brought onto the City Property by Licensee; and(b) all of the encroachments from the City Property in a manner reasonably satisfactory to City. If Licensee fails to commence performing the work required by this Section within thirty(30)calendar days following the termination of this Agreement(or shorter time period,if called for by an emergency), or if Licensee fails to diligently perform all work required by this Section to its completion, then City shall have the right to perform such work and Licensee shall reimburse City for all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by City in performing such work (including the costs of City's staff time, administrative overhead and legal costs), within fifteen (15) days after notice of such costs is given to Licensee. Licensee waives all claims against the City for damage to Licensee's employees, Licensee's property and/or any equipment allowed on 3 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 54 of 705 ends

Encroachment Area by Licensee,resulting from such removal. Licensee shall be liable to the City for the City's reasonable costs of removing the equipment and Licensee's property and repairing the City Property. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this License Agreement.
j. Licensee accepts the City Property"as is," "where is", subject to all faults and conditions as of the Effective Date, without any type of warranty. Without limiting the foregoing, neither City nor any agent of City has made any representation or warranty whatsoever, express or implied, with regard to the physical condition of the City Property or the suitability of the City Property for any particular purpose or use, including, any representation or warranty regarding the applicability or non-applicability of any laws,title to the City Property, the soil or subsoil, surface or subsurface conditions, topography, possible Hazardous Substance, contamination, fill, drainage, access to public roads, availability of utilities, existence of underground storage tanks, applicability of or compliance with any environmental laws or any other matter of any nature whatsoever.

4. Notice. Any notice, request, direction, demand, consent, waiver, approval or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall not be effective unless it is given in writing and shall be delivered(a)in person,(b)by certified mail,postage prepaid,return receipt requested, or (c) by a commercial overnight courier that guarantees next day delivery and provides a receipt, and addressed to the parties at the addresses stated below,or at such other address as either party may hereafter notify the other in writing as aforementioned:

Licensee: Cardinal Green Investments LLC
21 North Skokie Highway, Suite 203
Lake Bluff,Illinois 60044
Walgreen Co.

Real Estate Law Department
104 Wilmot Road,MS 144G
Deerfield,IL 60015
Re: Store#6061
City: 460 North Euclid Avenue
Upland, California 91786
Attention: City Manager
With a copy to: Banks, Garcia&Janis
10788 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Upland City Attorney
Service of any such notice or other communications so made shall be deemed effective on the day of actual delivery(whether accepted or refused) as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier;provided,however,that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received)or on a non-business day,then such notice or demand so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day immediately following the day of actual delivery.

No communications via facsimile and/or electronic mail shall be effective to give any notice, request, direction, demand, consent,waiver, approval or other communications hereunder. 4 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 55 of 705 ends

5. Attorneys' Fees. Should any action be brought arising out of this License Agreement, including, without limitation, any action for declaratory or injunctive relief, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.

6. Counterparts. This License Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,each of which shall be deemed to constitute an original, but all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument,with the same effect as if all of the parties had executed the same counterpart.

7. Successors and Assigns. Subject to City's approval rights in Section 3(f), this License Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of any transferee of Licensee's interest in the Encroachment.Licensee or Licensee's transferee shall provide written notice to City of any such transfer within thirty(30)days thereof.

8. Recordation. City shall immediately record this Encroachment License Agreement and Licensee agrees to reimburse City for any recordation fees incurred by City in connection therewith. This Encroachment License Agreement replaces and supersedes the Encroachment License Agreement recorded in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California on October 18, 2001 as Document 20010475314.
[SIGNATURES BEGIN ON NEXT PAGE]
5 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 56 of 705 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Encroachment License Agreement as of this day of January,2025 (the"Effective Date").

CITY: CITY OF UPLAND, a municipal corporation By:

Name:

Its:

ATTEST:

By:

Name:

Its:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Stephen Deitsch, City Attorney
LICENSEE:

CARDINAL GREEN INVESTMENTS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By:

Name:

Title:
6 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 57 of 705 ends

Exhibit"A"
Licensee Property
7 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 58 of 705 ends

Exhibit"B"
City Property and Encroachment Area
8 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 59 of 705 ends

Exhibit"C"
Site Plan
9 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

Page 60 of 705 ends

EXHIBIT "A"

LICENSEE'S PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

PARCEL 2, PORTION OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6004, AND THAT

PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SERVICE ROAD VACATED BY THE CITY OF

UPLAND, IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 6 PAGES 19 AND 20 OF PARCEL MAPS AND DOCUMENT RECORDED ON umber I$ ) AS
INSTRUMENT NO. A001 O 415 SO a-- OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,

RESPECTIVELY, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED WHOLLY AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2;
THENCE, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCELS 2 AND 3, NORTH 00°09'21" WEST 303.67 FEET;
THENCE, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, NORTH 89°45'00" EAST 196.25 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND ITS' SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION, SOUTH 00°09'40" EAST 303.67 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 107.00 FEET DISTANT NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT

RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTERLINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP;

THENCE, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, SOUTH 89°45'00" WEST 196.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 59,601 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.

1.4 4INo.5239
p. 6/30/03 *
41,
OCT 01 2001

Page 61 of 705 ends

i
4 EXHIBIT "B"

ENCROACHMENT IMPROVEMENTS
N89'45'00"E 196.25'
I \ . Sb
I
I I
I I
Wee.egitee4VAr SCALE: 1"=60'
PARCEL its ( ) INDICATES RECORD
7,1 DATA PER PARCEL
PARCEL ONE I66 MAP NO. 6004
LLA-99-02
lb
. I IP
I
'o
N
OI Iz
ZO IO
vl
(9 W
J
- U
o
-JII
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS Y
ct
a S89'45'0O"W
t 1 1" i i 1 j� 196.28' ; lil
- --;I q-
(1---DECORATIVEPUBLIC PRIVATE --�--= ; rl.•;'^ " PAVING -- ART—► T.—
-D SIDEWALK MON' -
SIGN 'AIL°a � UTILITY

FACILITIES
CITY R/W o - -- -� a
CAL TRANS R/W S89'45'00"W 196.28' .1
b ENCROACHMENT
Lo IMPROVEMENTS
N89'45'00"E r
LAN
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD c%cSS�NA� Ds��
PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: 1 NA. 5239 * DAVID R. GRAY, INC. EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. .� ,y '• f�'� .;.�, 2510-G LAS POSAS ROAD #255 2920 E. CAMELBACK ROAD SUITE 100 . �. `-'� CAMARILLO, CA 93010 PHOENIX, AZ 85016
JOB NO. 9908 SEP. 2001 OCT 04 2001

Page 62 of 705 ends

EGULEVAR
..„-------
� ,,;a o ��—n ;.
+— Q
r V , -- -.
41 p 1i z
--rfUZA OF
— ,71
•A ENGi20AGHp{E 3a
46' S"
R
rr I6NT-Or-wor-i.R �- - -I
, L I . J;. -T -�r-
1 1.- �c
1y H
•
•
] Ns
I - —A.

TI t •
,i,--
rThh- , , . ; it.
*,1`.— --.. i,._ - - -- ---m I. -
.Car,?.
fir, '/g I
q - , _
a
6 ,..,-, ti (,)
m N _ rD0
( O
IK
rn
Page f 705 e
41' X 12'•• 112' 3G' 1t •
----- - - - �h---t:

4��a �p19� CI FUPLAND
�5, _�� "The City of Gracious Living"
C,,tIFOB,S
'• Stafif(krctilt
_,
DATE: January 27,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:ROBERT DALQUEST,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR

ALAN FRENCH,PRINCIPAL ENGINEER

HARRY PARR,ASSISTANT ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITYWIDE SPEED LIMITS

AND RECEIVE AND FILE THE CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SPEED SURVEY
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Survey and adopt a Resolution establishing citywide speed limits covering 57 road segments.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of establishing safe speeds and enforceable speed limits within the City.

BACKGROUND
On January 14,2025,the Public Works Committee received a presentation by staff and recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution establishing speed limits as recommended by the Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Survey(Attached)on 57 roadway segments within the City.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices.These surveys must be updated every 5, 7, or 10 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

Setting speed limits through engineering and traffic surveys is the accepted method of establishing safe and reasonable driving speeds.

The California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys,including an evaluation of current vehicle speeds,collision history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists.

In this work effort, field data was collected, and roadways were inspected for any unique conditions. These were analyzed against the three-year collision history to determine a recommended speed limit for each segment. A summary of the results is provided in the table below.

Most of the existing roadway segment speeds remain the same. However, there are a few segments that are recommended to either increase or decrease.These adjustments are as follows:

Roadway Segment Existing Speed Limit Recommended Speed (MPH) Limit(MPH)
Arrow Hwy between San Antonio Ave 40 35
and Euclid Ave
246 Street between the westerly 30 35 terminus and Mountain Ave
Mountain Ave between Foothill Blvd 40 45
and I-10 Freeway

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Adopting an engineering and traffic survey in accordance with the CVC and MUTCD allows the Police Department to use radar speed enforcement methods,which is a more efficient and effective way to monitor,control and enforce

Page 64 of 705 ends

the posted speeds. Current engineering traffic speed surveys are necessary documentation for the Police Department on any court-disputed moving violation.

Without a current traffic engineering speed survey, the Police Department can only enforce speeds by pacing the vehicle speeds.This method of speed enforcement is cumbersome for the Police Department.

Under the MUTCD, current speed information is used in developing traffic signal timing schedules. This adopted speed information will be used as required in updating the City's traffic signal operations.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action involves replacing some traffic signs and is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project"and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
Minimal costs are anticipated related to: 1)modifications in the signage and pavement marking where the street speeds are recommended for adjustment will be required;and 2)supplemental signage and pavement marking will be installed at appropriate locations to alert drivers to the required traveling speed. There are available funds in the current Public Works Maintenance and Operations budget.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

Page 65 of 705 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CITYWIDE SPEED
LIMITS
WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, fifty-seven (57) roadway segments are identified by the City of Upland for speed zone evaluations; and WHEREAS, City staff completed an engineering and traffic survey and determined the appropriate speed on all of the following roadway segments; and WHEREAS, with the adoption of the speed limits, law enforcement shall be able to enforce the posted speed limits by the use of radar equipment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Upland hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. The City Council does hereby approve the herein speed limits in accordance with Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and, the Engineering and Traffic Survey report dated December 4, 2024:
30 M.P.H. be posted on 7th Street between Harrington Avenue and Grove Avenue; on Deakin Avenue between 24th Street and Mildura Avenue; on Mildura Avenue between Benson Avenue and Mountain Avenue; on Grove Avenue between 15th Street and Foothill Boulevard; and
35 M.P.H, be posted on 24th Street between westerly terminus and Mountain Avenue; 24th Street between San Antonio Avenue and easterly terminus; on 23rd Street between Mountain Avenue and Campus Avenue; on 22nd Street between Mountain Avenue and Campus Avenue; on 21st Street between San Antonio Avenue and Campus Avenue; on 20th Street between Mountain Avenue and Winston Court; on 19th Street between Mountain Avenue and Euclid Avenue and on 19th Street between Euclid Avenue and Campus Avenue; on 18th Street between Benson Avenue and Sunnybrook Avenue; on Colonies Parkway between Campus Avenue and 19th Street; on 17th Street between Mountain Avenue and Campus Avenue; on 15th Street between Benson and Euclid Avenue and on 15th Street between Euclid Avenue and Campus Avenue; on 14th Street between Fairwood Way and Campus Avenue and on 14th Street between Campus Ave and Grove Ave; on 13th Street between Benson Avenue and Campus Avenue; on 11th Street between Monte Vista Avenue and Benson Avenue and on 11th Street between Benson Avenue and Hospital Parkway; on Arrow Highway between San Antonio Avenue and Grove Avenue; on San Bernardino Road between Arrow Highway and Grove Avenue; on 9th Street between Central Avenue and Euclid Avenue and 9th Street between

Page 66 of 705 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 ends

Euclid Avenue and Grove Avenue; on 8th Street between San Antonio Avenue and Grove Avenue; on San Antonio Avenue between 24th Street and Foothill Boulevard and on San Antonio Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and I-10 Freeway; on Campus Avenue between 24th St and 22nd St and on Campus Avenue between 20th Street and 19th Street (south) and on Campus Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and I-10 Freeway; on Tanglewood Avenue between Colonies Parkway and 16th Street; and
40 M.P. H, be posted on 21st St between Mountain Ave and San Antonio Ave; on 20th Street between Campus Ave (west) and its easterly terminus; Arrow Route/Highway between Central Avenue and San Antonio Avenue; on 8th Street between Benson Avenue and San Antonio Avenue; on 7th Street between Benson Avenue and Mountain Avenue; on Central Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and 9th Street; on Benson Avenue between Mountain Avenue and 18th Street and on Benson Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and I-10 Freeway; on Mountain Avenue between 24th Street and 23rd Street (southbound lanes); on Euclid Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and 7th Street; on Campus Avenue between 22nd Street and 20th Street and on Campus Ave between 19th Street (south) and Foothill Boulevard; and
45 M.P.H. be posted on 19th Street between Campus Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Trail; on 16th Street/Baseline Road between SR-210 and Euclid Avenue and on 16th Street between Euclid Avenue and Tanglewood Avenue; on Foothill Boulevard between Monte Vista Avenue and Euclid Avenue and on Foothill Boulevard between Euclid Avenue and Grove Avenue; on Arrow Route between Claremont Boulevard and Central Avenue; on Monte Vista Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Richton Street; on Benson Avenue between 18th Street and Foothill Boulevard; on Mountain Avenue between 23rd Street and 16th Street and on Mountain Avenue between 16th Street and Foothill Boulevard and on Mountain Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and I-10 Freeway; on Euclid Avenue between 24th Street and 16th Street and on Euclid Avenue between 16th Street and Foothill Boulevard.

Section 3. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds that this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

Further, if the activity is deemed a project this City Council finds that this Resolution is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

Page 67 of 705 ends

Resolution No.

Page 3 ends

Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 2025.

Bill Velto, Mayor
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 27th day of January, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

Page 68 of 705 ends

Report dated December 4, 2024

THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SPEED SURVEY DIGEST
The Engineering and Traffic Surveys are conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014 Edition, Revision 8 (CA-MUTCD); and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code(CVC).The CVC further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed;

2. Collision history; and

3. Traffic and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist.

The CA-MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Survey, including an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, collision history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists.

Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are obtained by radar speed survey. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic.This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed.

The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a "basic speed limit" is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed.

Collision History
Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions.A segment that has an above-average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. It is important to note that the CA-MUTCD recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. CA-MUTCD also states that local authorities, when qualifying an appropriate speed limit, may consider the following:
• Residential Density AQ ofES
• Pedestrian and bicyclist safety <49lIii3
..r i rlr t V r - 5fir

Page 69 of 705 ends

44,OF UpL
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
e9LIFO4Wl'
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION 1
ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 2 Speed Sampling 2
Collision History 2
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists 2 SURVEY CONDITIONS 3
SURVEY LOCATIONS 3
DATA COLLECTION 3
Speed Data 3
Collision Data 3
Field Review Data 4
ANALYSIS 5
CRITERIA 5
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5
TABLE 1 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Limit Change 6 TABLE 2 - Summary of Recommendations 7
APPENDIX A— Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms A APPENDIX B— Radar Speed Surveys B
APPENDIX C—Collision Data and Rates C
APPENDIX D— Legislative References D
APPENDIX E—2014 CA-MUTCD F
Decem r 202740 of 705

4OF UI•t9
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
°I LI %r
FOa�

INTRODUCTION
This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Upland. This report presents recommended speed limits for 57 street segments in the City of Upland. Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices.These surveys must be updated every 5, 7, or 10 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), 2014 Edition. Relevant sections of the CA- MUTCD are included in Appendix E.

The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years.The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)]. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 10 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(S)(i)(II)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current.

Excerpts from the CVC are provided in Appendix D for reference.

The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the CA-MUTCD, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC.The Code further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed;

2. Collision history; and

3. Traffic and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist.

Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that"No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather,visibility,the traffic on,and the surface and width of the highway,and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore,the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable 1 December 024
Rage 71 of 705

44'OF UI•t9
�s 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys • City of Upland
o . tir
4LIFOa�
driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
The CA-MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys.This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, collision history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as follows:

Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic.This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds.A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85' percentile speed. The 85' percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels.This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a "basic speed limit" is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed. For example, if the 85th percentile speed is 48 mph, the basic speed limit is 50 mph. If the 85th percentile speed is 47 mph,the basic speed limit is 45 mph.

44OF UI•tffit
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
`4L' tir
IFOa,
that the CA-MUTCD recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit.

SURVEY CONDITIONS

SURVEY LOCATIONS
The procedures below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Upland. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

DATA COLLECTION
Existing conditions information was obtained including prevailing vehicle speed,traffic collisions,visibility restrictions,and roadway conditions within the community.Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 57 locations between December 2022 and January 2023. Appendix A contains Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms that summarize the data collection and recommendations for each street segment.

Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 57 locations between October and December 2022. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions,during off-peak hours on Tuesdays,Wednesdays and Thursdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior.Typically, a minimum sample size of 200 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment.Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments. Radar speed survey results for each location are presented in Appendix B.

Collision Data
Collision data was obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic collision database. For this study, collision data was obtained for the latest 3 years of reported collisions from August 1, 2020 to August 1, 2023. Collisions that occurred at intersections were proportionally allocated to each approach leg of the intersection. The collision rates for the 57 segments, expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM), were determined by using the following formula:

A x 1,000,000
R =
days
tx365yearxlxv
year
3 December 2024 73 of 705

4 OF UAL
1~4 R d 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys City of Upland
e94I1,044l"'
A = Number of collisions over time period
R= Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles)
/= Length of Segment (miles)
v=Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
t=years of reported collisions (years)
The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The average collision rates, obtained from the 2020 Crash Data on California State Highways(Caltrans), are as follows:

Urban Highway Type Average Collision Rate
Conventional 2 lanes or less, =45 mph 0.61
Conventional 3 lanes 1.61
Undivided 4 lanes, =45 mph 0.77
Undivided 5-6 lanes, =45 mph 0.31
Divided 4 lanes, =45 mph 0.93
Divided 5 lanes or more, =45 mph 0.87
The three-year collision data and a summary of the collision rates for the 57 surveyed street segments are provided in Appendix C.

Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration of the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment (design speed);

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;

3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;

5. Location of stop signs, speed limit signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;

6. Visibility obstructions;

7. Land use and proximity to schools;

8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;

9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and

10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver. 4 December 2024
12'age 74 of 705

S4.0V ZIPt,9
~ �d 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys City of Upland
`
4tIFORt

ANALYSIS

CRITERIA
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with criteria contained in the CA-MUTCD. Criteria utilized included:

A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable.Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe.Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The "basic speed limit" is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.

B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed.

C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile.These average collision rates have been developed by the County of Los Angeles and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Upland.

RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, depict results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed. The recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements.Typically, a speed limit within the 10-mile pace was selected unless a collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified.All segments are fully explained later in this report.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law(CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.

The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of the CVC). This statute states that a person shall not 5 December 024
Rage 75 of 705

44'OF UI•t9
�r ; �s• 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys i°z =
City of Upland
o .IFO tir
�La�
drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions.

A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.

Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes to the posted speed limits.

TABLE 1 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Limit Change Posted
Segment Recommended
Street From To Speed
No. Speed Limit
Limit
1 24th Street Westerly terminus Mountain Ave 30 35 10 Mountain Avenue I - 10 Foothill Blvd 40 45 28 Arrow Highway San Antonio Ave Euclid Ave 40 35 Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments. 6 December 2024
Rage 76 of 705

pF Upt
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
C°1 City of Upland
fFOYL
TABLE 2 - Summary of Recommendations
Posted Recommended 85th
Segment 'ercentile
Roadway Segment Speed Limit Speed Limit Reason for Change Number (mph) (mph) Speed
(mph)
24th St:
1 1) b/t Western Terminus& Mountain Ave 30 35 39 85th percentile speed; low collision history an mMilliAnklio Ave&Eastern Terminus 35 35
23rd St
3 b/t Mountain Ave&Campus Ave 35 35
22nd St
• Mountain Ave&Campus Ave 35 35
21st St
5 b/t San Antonio Ave and Campus Ave6 b/t Mountain Ave and San Antonio Ave 40 40 45 20th St
7 b/t Mountain Ave and San Antonio Ave 35 35 39 •/t Campus Ave(west)and Easerly terminus 4•
19th St
EIvlountain Ave anikEucliddipt
10 b/t Euclid Ave and Campus Ave 35 35 42 rb/t Campus Ave and Cucamonga Creek Trail
18th St
12 b/t Benson Ave and Sunnybrook Ave
Colonies Parkway
b/t Campus Ave and 19th St 35r� I
17th St
b/t Mountain Ave and Campus Ave 35 35
16th St
[b/t SR-210 and Euclid Ave 45 45 ,
7 diatgab727.00745

pF Upt

4.4 -. . 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys �, � City of Upland
w T
Posted Recommended 85th
Segment Percentile
Roadway Segment Speed Limit Speed Limit Reason for Change Number (mph) (mph) Speed
(mph)
16 b/t Euclid Ave and Tanglewood Ave 45 45 47 15th St M,
17 b/t Benson Ave and Euclid Ave 35 35 41 rEuclidand Campus Ave il 35 _ 42 aill 14th St
J=Intairwood Way and Campus Ave milli
20 b/t Campus Ave and Grove Ave 35 35 40 13th St
21 b/t Benson Ave and Campus Ave 35 35 39 Foothill Boulevard
22 b/t Monte Vista Ave and Euclid Ave 45 45 42 rrt Euclid Ave and GroArAVe
11th St
Ib/t Monte Vista Ave and Benson Ave I 3,25 b/t Benson Ave and Hospital Pkwy 35 35 35 Arrow Route/Highway Il
26 b/t Claremont Blvd and Central Ave 45 45 46 27 ve and San
28 b/t San Antonio Ave and Grove Ave 40/35 35 37 85th percentile speed; 10 mph pace speed;conditions not readily apparent to drivers
San Bernardino Road
29 b/t Arrow Hwy and Grove Ave 35 35 39 9th St
30 b/t Central Ave and Euclid Ave 35 35 38 31 b/t Third Ave and Grove Ave 35 IMIIM
8th St
32 b/t Benson Ave and San Antonio Ave 40 40 AM 8 cRage 0074 5

pF Upt
:`. 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys e.,' a". City of Upland
T
Posted Recommended 85th
Segment Percentile
Roadway Segment Speed Limit Speed Limit Reason for Change Number (mph) (mph) Speed
(mph)
33 b/t
San Antonio Ave and Grove Ave 35 35 35
7tiEt
34 b/t Benson Ave and Mountain Ave 40 40 36 •Harrington Ave and GroyMill 30 30 34
Monte Vista Avenue
36 b/t Foothill Blvd and Richton St 45 45 44 Central Ave
ii
37 b/t Foothill Blvd and 9th St 40 40 44 Deakin Avenue
38 b/t 24th St and Mildura Ave 30 30 38
Mildura Avenue
39 b/t Benson Ave and Mountain Ave 30 30 41 Benson Avenue
•
40 b/t Mountain Ave and 18th St 40 40 50
41 b/t 18th St and Foothill Blvd 45 45 43
•
42 b/t Foothill Blvd and 1-10 Freeway 40 40 43 Mountain Avenue
43a •b/t 24th St and 23rd St 40 40 (Shareliardino Co 43 b/t 23rd St and 16t"St 45 45 51
44 '.16th St and Foothill Blvd MIIIIIM5 MINIM
45 b/t Foothill Blvd and 1-10 Freeway 40 45 46 85th percentile speed; 10 mph pace speed San Antonio Avenue
46 b/t 24th St and Foothill Blvd 35 35 42
47 b/t Foothill Blvd and 1-10 Freeway 35 35 43 Euclid Avenue
48 b/t 24th St and 16th St 45 45 50
49 b/t 16th St and Foothill Blvd 45 45 50
9 cRage 17Eii 0074)5

pF Upt

4.4 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys City of Upland
7Fn�
Posted Recommended 85th
Segment Percentile
Roadway Segment Speed Limit Speed Limit Reason for Change Number (mph) (mph) Speed
(mph)
50 b/t Foothill Blvd and 7th St
Campus Avenue:
let 24th St and 22"d Si 52 b/t 22"d St and 20th St 40 40 44 Oth St and19th St(South 54 b/t 19th St(South)and Foothill Blvd 40 40 44 b/t Foothill Blvd and -Tanglewood Avenue
56 b/t Colonies Pkwy and 16th St MM
Grove Avenue
57 b/t 15th St and Foothill Blvd
10 cRagje,If&@624D5

4 pF aAt
.�'`. 91a 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys City of Upland

SPEED LIMIT JUSTIFICATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following 57 segments were surveyed and speed limit recommendations and justifications are described for each segment.

Segment 1: 24th Street is classified as a local street with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between its westerly terminus and Mountain Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 30 mph. The recommended speed limit is to be increased to 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed and the lower than average collision rate. Since 24th Street is partially within the jurisdiction of the Unincorporated County of San Bernardino, information on the recommended speed limits along 24th Street have been provided to the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for coordination and approval.

Segment 2: 24th Street is classified as a local street with a curb to curb width of approximately 42 feet between San Antonio Avenue and its easterly terminus. The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed. Since 24th Street is partially within the jurisdiction of the Unincorporated County of San Bernardino, information on the recommended speed limits along 24th Street have been provided to the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for coordination and approval.

Segment 3: 23rd Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Mountain Avenue and Campus Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts, and lack of sidewalks.

Segment 4: 22nd Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Mountain Avenue and Campus Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 5: 21st Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between San Antonio Avenue and Campus Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed,the 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts.

Segment 6: 21st Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between San Antonio Avenue and Mountain Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th 11 December 2024
Rage 81 of 705

4 pF bAt
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
o
'rerFORi°P
percentile speed,the 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds, and on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts.

Segment 7: 20th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Mountain Avenue and Winston Ct.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed,the 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts.

Segment 8: 20th Street is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 44 feet between its easterly terminus and Campus Avenue (west).The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and the roadway alignment.

Segment 9: 19th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Mountain Avenue and Euclid Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed,the 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts.

Segment 10: 19th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Euclid Avenue and Campus Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed and the 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 11: 19th Street is classified as an Arterial Road with a curb to curb width of approximately 72 feet between Campus Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Trail. The recommended speed limit is 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and the 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.The existing posted speed limit on 19th Street immediately east of this study segment within the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 45 mph which is also consistent with the recommended speed limit for this study segment.

Segment 12: 18th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Benson Avenue and Sunnybrook Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed,the 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and vicinity to school.

Segment 13: Colonies Parkway is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 44 feet between Campus Avenue and 19th Street.The existing posted speed limit of this segment 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, residential access with pedestrian activity, and roadway geometrics such as alignment changes and curves. 12 December 2024
Rage 82 of 705

4 pF bAt
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
o
'rerFORi°P
Segment 14: 17th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Mountain Avenue and Campus Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and vicinity to a school.

Segment 15: 16th Street(Baseline Rd) is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between SR-210 Freeway and Euclid Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and direct residential access with pedestrian activity. The existing posted speed limit on 16th Street immediately west of this study segment within the City of Claremont is 45 mph which is also consistent with the recommended speed limit for this study segment.

Segment 16: 16th Street is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between Euclid Avenue and Tanglewood Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and direct residential access with pedestrian activity.The existing posted speed limit on 16th Street immediately east of this study segment within the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 45 mph which is also consistent with the recommended speed limit for this study segment.

Segment 17: 15th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Benson Avenue and Euclid Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 18: 15th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Euclid Avenue and Campus Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts, and vicinity to school.

Segment 19: 14th Street is classified as a Collector street with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Fairwood Way and Campus Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 20: 14th Street is classified as a Collector street with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Campus Ave and Grove Ave.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and direct residential access with pedestrian activity. 13 Decembervage 83 of 705

4 pF bAt
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
o
'rerFORi°P
Segment 21: 13th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Benson Avenue and Campus Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and vicinity to school.

Segment 22: Foothill Boulevard is classified as a Major Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 76 feet to 96 feet between Monte Vista Avenue and Euclid Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 23: Foothill Boulevard is classified as a Major Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 76 feet between Euclid Avenue and Grove Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 24: 11th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 44 feet between Monte Vista Avenue and Benson Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to be remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and consistency with the adjacent roadway segment speed limit.

Segment 25: 11th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Benson Avenue and Hospital Parkway.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 26:Arrow Route is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between Claremont Boulevard and Central Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed. The existing posted speed limit on arrow Route immediately west of this study segment within the City of Claremont is 30 mph.

Segment 27:Arrow Route/Highway is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between Central Avenue and San Antonio Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts.

Segment 28:Arrow Highway is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 to 48 feet between San Antonio Avenue and Grove Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph west of Euclid, and 35 mph east of Euclid. The recommended speed limit is to be reduced to 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10- 14 December 2024
Rage 84 of 705

4 pF bAt
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
o
'rerFORi°P
mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts. The existing posted speed limit on Arrow Route immediately east of this study segment within the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 45 mph.

Segment 29: San Bernardino Road is classified as a Local street with a curb to curb width of approximately 36 to 50 feet between Arrow Highway and Grove Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, residential area with pedestrian activity, and vicinity to an activity area such as parks, community center, or hospital.

Segment 30: 9th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 24 feet to 64 feet between Central Avenue and Euclid Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 31: 9th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between Third Avenue and Grove Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, on- street parking with potential traffic conflicts, and consistency with the adjacent roadway segment speed limit.

Segment 32: 8th Street is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 73 feet between Benson Avenue and San Antonio Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and direct residential access with pedestrian activity. The existing posted speed limit on 8th Street immediately west of this study segment within the City of Montclair is 45 mph.

Segment 33: 8th Street is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between San Antonio Avenue and the east City limit.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.The existing posted speed limit on 8th Street immediately east of this study segment within the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 45 mph.

Segment 34: 7th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between Benson Avenue and Mountain Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 35: 7th Street is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 36 to 40 feet between Harrington Avenue and Grove Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this 15 December 2024
Rage 85 of 705

4 pF bAt
a 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys City of Upland
o
'rerFORi°P
segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to be reduced to 30 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 36: Monte Vista Avenue is classified as a Local street with a curb to curb width of approximately 110 feet between Foothill Boulevard and Pacific Electric Trail.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 37: Central Avenue is classified as a major arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 72 feet between Foothill Boulevard and 9th Street.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 38: Deakin Avenue is classified as a Local street with a curb to curb width of approximately 44 feet between 24th Street and Mildura Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 30 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 30 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts, and roadway geometrics such as alignment changes and curves.

Segment 39: Mildura Avenue is classified as a Local street with a curb to curb width of approximately 44 feet between Benson Avenue and Mountain Avenue.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 30 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 30 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and roadway geometrics such as alignment changes and curves.

Segment 40: Benson Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet to 90 feet between 18th St and Mountain Ave.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, residential area with pedestrian activity, and roadway geometrics such as alignment changes and curves.

Segment 41: Benson Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between 18th Street and Foothill Boulevard.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 42: Benson Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 10 (1-10) Freeway.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed. The existing posted speed limit on Benson Avenue immediately south of this study segment within the City of Ontario and City of Montclair is 35 mph. 16 December 2024
Rage 86 of 705

4 pF bAt
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
o
'rerFORi°P
Segment 43: Mountain Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 80 feet between 23rd Street and 16th Street.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed. The existing posted speed limit on Mountain Avenue immediately north of this study segment within the Unincorporated County of San Bernardino is 40 mph.

Segment 44: Mountain Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 90 feet between 16th Street and Foothill Boulevard.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 45: Mountain Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 86 feet between Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 10 (1-10) Freeway.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to be increased to 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed. The existing posted speed limit on Mountain Avenue immediately south of this study segment within the City of Ontario is 40 mph.

Segment 46: San Antonio Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between 24th Street and Foothill Boulevard.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts, and consistency with the adjacent roadway segment speed limit.

Segment 47: San Antonio Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 10 (1-10) Freeway.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph.The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.The existing posted speed limit on San Antonio Avenue immediately south of this study segment within the City of Ontario is 35 mph which is also consistent with the recommended speed limit for this segment.

Segment 48: Euclid Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 140 feet between 24th Street and 16th Street.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 49: Euclid Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 145 feet between 16th Street and Foothill Boulevard.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 45 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain 45 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.
17 December 2024
Rage 87 of 705

4 pF bAt
2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys
City of Upland
o
'rerFORi°P
Segment 50: Euclid Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 152 feet between Foothill Boulevard and 7th Street.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed. There is no speed limit currently posted on Euclid Avenue immediately south of this study segment within the City of Ontario.

Segment 51: Campus Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between 24th Street and 22nd Street.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, direct residential access with pedestrian activity, and on-street parking with potential traffic conflicts.

Segment 52: Campus Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet between 22nd Street and 20th Street.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 53: Campus Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 76 feet to 88 feet between 20th Street and 19th Street(south).The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 54: Campus Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 64 feet between 19th Street (south) and Foothill Boulevard.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 40 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 40 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 55: Campus Avenue is classified as a Secondary Arterial with a curb to curb width of approximately 36 feet between Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 10 (1-10) Freeway. The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and higher than average collision rates. There is no speed limit currently posted on Campus Avenue immediately south of this study segment within the City of Ontario.

Segment 56:Tanglewood Avenue is classified as a Collector with a curb to curb width of approximately 44 feet between Colonies Parkway and 16th Street.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 35 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile-per-hour pace speed.

Segment 57: Grove Avenue is classified as a Local street with a curb to curb width of approximately 40 feet to 64 feet between 15th Street and Foothill Boulevard.The existing posted speed limit of this segment is 30 mph. The recommended speed limit is to remain at 30 mph, due to the 85th percentile speed, 10-mile-per-hour pace speed, and direct residential access with pedestrian activity.
18 December2024 88 of 705

EXHI BIT A

Ar ..
m o1
.,
i - of p p
m =' hf
•, la. eiY1u11t
0 n
41 - -
p 10 CIm
54/ 113
El .•
40 14
• 43 48
BASELINE ST.
111 16
•
- - '. 49 _
ri
•
7 19 20
•
® ®
44 46 II
El
t45 47 50 III
24 _ ® m
m ® m
1 III
•
® 42 i
______ op 1
I III _ I I I
\CitT of - .._ ..... - - --.. .
34 'MICI '
onto
I '
-I- • _.-- - 1
•

1. 24th St between Westerly Terminus and Mountain Ave. 21. 13th St between Benson Ave.and Campus Ave. 41. Benson Ave between 18th St.and Foothill Blvd.

2. 24th St between San Antonio Ave.and Easterly Terminus 22. Foothill Blvd between Monte Vista Ave.and Euclid Ave. 42. Benson Ave between Foothill Blvd.and 1-10 Freeway

3. 23rd St between Mountain Ave.and Campus Ave. 23. Foothill Blvd between Euclid Ave.and Grove Ave. 43. Mountain Ave between 23rd St.and 16th St. 4 22nd St between Mountain Ave.and Campus Ave. 24. 11th St between Monte Vista Ave.and Benson Ave. 44. Mountain Ave between 16th St.and Foothill Blvd.

5. 21'`St between San Antonio Ave.and Campus Ave. 25. 11th St between Benson Ave.and Hospital Pkwy. 45. Mountain Ave between Foothill Blvd and 1-10 Freeway

6. 21e`St between Mountain Ave.and San Antonio Ave. 26. Arrow Route between Claremont Blvd.and Central Ave. 46. San Antonio Ave between 24th St.and Foothill Blvd.

7. 20th St between Mountain Ave.and Winston Ct 27. Arrow Hwy between Central Ave.and San Antonio Ave. 47. San Antonio Ave between Foothill Blvd.and 1-10 Freeway

8. 20th St between Campus Ave.(west)and Easterly Terminus 28. Arrow Hwy between San Antonio Ave.and Grove Ave. 48. Euclid Ave between 24th St.and 16th St.

9. 19th St between Mountain Ave.and Euclid Ave. 29. San Bernardino Rd between Arrow Highway and Grove Ave. 49. Euclid Ave between 16th St.and Foothill Blvd.

10. 19th St between Euclid Ave.and Campus Ave. 30. 9th St between Central Ave.and Euclid Ave. 50. Euclid Ave between Foothill Blvd.and 7th St.

11. 19th St between Campus Ave.and Cucamonga Creek Trail 31. 9th St between 3rd Ave.and Grove Ave. 51. Campus Ave between 24th St.and 22nd St.

12. 18th St between Benson Ave.and Sunnybrook Ave. 32. 8th St between Benson Ave.and San Antonio Ave. 52. Campus Ave between 22nd St.and 20th St.

13. Colonies Pkwy between Campus Ave.and 19th St. 33. 8th St between San Antonio Ave.and Grove Ave. 53. Campus Ave between 20th St.and 19th St(south).

14. 17th St between Mountain Ave.and Campus Ave. 34. 7th St between Benson Ave.and Mountain Ave. 54. Campus Ave between 19th St(south)and Foothill Blvd.

15. 16th St between SR-210 and Euclid Ave. 35. 7th St between Harrington Ave.and Grove Ave. 55. Campus Ave between Foothill Blvd.and 1-10 Freeway

16. 16th St between Euclid Ave.and Tanglewood Ave. 36. Monte Vista Ave between Foothill Blvd.and Richton St. 56. Tanglewood Ave between Colonies Pkwy.and 16th St.

17. 15th St between Benson Ave.and Euclid Ave. 37. Central Ave between Foothill Blvd.and 9th St. 57. Grove Ave between 15th St.and Foothill Blvd.

18. 15th St between Euclid Ave.and Campus Ave. 38. Deakin Ave between 24th St.and Mildura Ave.

19. 14th St between Fairwood Way and Campus Ave. 39. Mildura Ave between Benson Ave.and Mountain Ave.

20. 14th St between Campus Ave and Grove Ave 40. Benson Ave between Mountain Ave.and 18th St.

Page 89 of 705 ends

EXHIBITS
2024 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS
24TH ST
I I
DEAKIN AVE •i I 23RD ST I
I I
1 22ND ST I
MILDURAAVE� '
I
• I 21ST ST
I
20TH ST - L . _f I.
•� ♦ I
f - I
19TH ST
I 18TH ST I
,� - . . _ _ , _ .e >
I a
I 17TH ST • COLONIES PKWY • O0
I I 0
x,
1 IJ
16TH ST I I z
F-
I ' w
I '
15TH ST
• • O
- I 13TH ST I •
1 • �
1 FOOTHILL BLVD I •
I •
II 11TH ST J' I O��O
I
I I
I

ARROW HWYIL
L1P� '
I I
I
-r
9TH ST II
_ _ _ I I
> I I
aI I
a w � � I 8THST
VI > — I I I
a I I I
w 7TH ST I
z _ _ _
I I I
LU w uJ LU
z z 0J
z
0 o
z z H LU
w D z
m 0 a
g z
a
v)
Legend:
=30 MPH = INCREASE IN EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
=35 MPH = DECREASE IN EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
• — • — • - =40 MPH = EXISTING SPEED LIMIT TO REMAIN =45 MPH

Page 90 of 705 ends

EXHIBIT C
2024 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)
1136 1063
24TH ST
735 ,n
23RD ST 2152 ,-'
N
m
22ND ST 1450
2211 0o
m
21ST ST - 5804 00 2881 d-
of
20TH ST 6�'15 457 3872
00 d-
°-' 8904 3
19TH ST 5248 elf L 1
6,003
M
18TH ST 2588 >
4424 a
0 O
17TH ST 2040 COLONIES PKWY 0
w
J
Ql
N z
16,656 19,764 "' Q
16TH ST
m
00 v
oo
2711 m
2230 N
15TH ST
2323 2806 w
14TH ST >
if) Q
m w
L.r) >
4828 °;
13TH ST o
(NJ
FOOTHILL BLVD 28,528 28,799
11TH ST 4248 4999 0-#0)\'O 9113
ARROW HWY 6370
11,574 13,532 SP
00 N
cm
O r-I N Li-)
Ni °�' M 7723 00 7610
9TH ST o
r.

Q 17,194 N° 11,535
1- > 8TH ST
5 J
LU
F CC 11,837 10,724
z z 7TH ST
0w 1 2 u
w w w w
> > > >
a a
z z 0 o
O Tt E u Q
z z
w D z w a
CO 0 Q
z
Q U
N

Page 91 of 705 ends

pF Upt
..ado 2024 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Speed Surveys City of Upland
RtiFna�
APPENDIX A — Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms
December2024 92 of 705

•

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:24th St Seg.01
LIMITS:Westerly Terminus to Mountain Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 30 30 _
Surrounding land uses RES RES/PARK
Does surrounding land use have direct access N Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y(MAJORITY)
Sidewalks present Y N •
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 1136
Length of segment(miles) 0.52
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 39
50th percentile speed(mph) 34
15th percentile speed(mph) 28
Range of speeds(mph)
24-46
10-tulle pace speed 30-39
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 66%
Collision Analysis for recent24 months
Total number of collisions 0
Total collision rate per MVMT 0
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1,07 is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver
E 'iC i
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans lq f •
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By:

FOG
'® gage 93 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:24th St Seg.02
LIMITS:between San Antonio Ave.and Easterly Terminus
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 42' _
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y Y
Raised Median N N
On-street parking
y Y i
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y(MAJORITY) N(MAJORITY)
Street Illutimationmidblock Y Y _ I Street illumination at Intersection Y Y I Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 1063
Length of segment(miles) 1.23
_Speed Characteristics
95th percentile speed(mph) 39
•
50th percentile speed(mph) 35
15th percentile speed(mph) 30 i
Range of speeds(mph)
21-46
10-mile pace speed 30-39 1
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 74% • Collision Analysis for recent 36 months .

Total number of collisions 0
Total collision rate per MVMT 0
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity _ Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N •
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) Y Recommended speed limit(mph) 35 I Conditions not readily apparent to driver V *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Cantons �3' r �, cirt Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: y
d. rA } Y,4.

O��® `Page 94 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:23rd St Seg.03 •
LIMITS:between Mountain Ave.and Campus Ave.

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40 I Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y(MAJORITY)
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(HIM/L) H H
Y(NO C&G WEST OF SAN •
Curb and gutter present Y ANTONIO) •
Sidewalks present Y YIN •
Street Illutimatlon midblack Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y • Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2152
Length of segment(miles) _ 1.56
Speed Characteristics
65th percentile speed(mph) 45
50th percentile speed(mph) 39
15th percentile speed(mph) 36
Range of speeds(mph) 30.49
10-mile pace speed 36-45
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 73%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 20
Total collision rate per MVMT 2.24
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? Y • Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y •
Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parkingwith potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y(MILDURA) • Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N • Vicinity to school or other activity area N Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) V Recommended speed limit{mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver '-t°= Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans "l •
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: s?r0 I i,a'm�.
sixth ,I
"' '"i",' PV4,F f V'•-'-.V''41/• g. Page 95 of 705

1 1

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:22nd St Seg.04
LIMITS:between Mountain Ave.and Campus Ave. 1 DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 _ Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y •
Posted speed Limit(mph) 35 35
•
Surrounding land uses RES/SCHOOL RES/SCHOOL • Does surrounding Land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/MIL) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street Illutimation midblock Y Y
Street Illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike Lanes N N 1
Two-way deify traffic volume(ADT) 1450
Length of segment(miles) _ 1.57
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 41
50th percentile speed(mph) 35
15th percentile speed(mph) 30 •
•
Range of speeds(mph) 25-48
10-mile pace speed 29-38
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 68%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 5
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.60 _
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N _ Other Special Conditions ,
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.)
Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Cal trans ..4;,104te .,
•
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: ' .� . Nat2.12 �,
1� , .* .
;,ai

1. ! Cpa,, � '`Page 96 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:21st St Seg.05
LIMITS:between San Antonio Ave.and Campus Ave.

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width{feet) 40'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y(MAJORITY)
Raised Median Ni
On-street parking V Y
Posted speed limit(mph) — 35 35 —
Surrounding land uses RES RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street Illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2881
Length of segment(miles) 1.03
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 40
50th percentile speed(mph) 35.
15th percentile speed(mph) 31
Range of speeds(mph) 25-45
10-mile pace speed 32-41
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 77/o°
II
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 17
Total collision rate per MVMT 2.85
Average crash rate for this hwyclassification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high' Y
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y j Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other{Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) (3)ALL-WAY STOPS Recommended speed limit(mph} 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver _ V *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caftrans ip!‘
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: C/ y; B *26; . ;.:ri i I
J '. 0-. I '`;
= -age 97 of 705

•

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:21st St Seg.06
LIMITS:between Mountain Ave,and San Antonio Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL; EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 64'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph} 40 40
Surrounding land uses RES/CHURCH RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access
Frequency of driveways(HIM/L) H M
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y •
Street Illutimatlon mldblock •
Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection • Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT} 5804
Length of segment(miles) 0.54 --
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 45
• SOth percentile speed(mph) 41
15th percentile speed(mph) 38
Range of speeds(mph} 31-53
10-mile pace speed 37-46
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 65%
Collision Analysis for recent36 months
Total number of collisions 6
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.31
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.66 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks N
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistencywith adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 40
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N *Source;2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans 1 Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By:
2 O age 98 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:20th St Seg.07
LIMITS:between Mountain Ave.and Winston Ct
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: SB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median y
Raised Median N
On-street parking
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES/PARK
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H!M/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street Illutimation midblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 457
Length of segment(miles) 1.47
Speed Characteristics
05th percentile speed(mph) 39
50th percentile speed(mph) 34
15th percentile speed(mph) 28
Range of speeds(mph) 21-44
10-mile pace speed 30-39
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 69%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 2
Total collision rate per MVMT 2.03
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N j Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks N
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access _ N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistencywith adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves;etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) _ 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caitrans •
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: 7 Ala I -T rt

Page 99 of 705 ends

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:20th St Seg.08
LIMITS:between Campus Ave.(W)and EasterlyTerminus
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 44
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median y
Raised Median N
On-street parking N
Posted speed limit(mph) 40
Surrounding land uses COM IND
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y N Frequency of driveways(HIMIL) M L
Curb and gutter present

Y(DEVELOPED
Sidewalks present FRONTAGE ONLY) N
Street Illutimation midbiock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection • Y Y
Bikelanes N N •
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 3872
Length of segment(miles) 0.58
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 41
•
50th percentile speed(mph) 36
15th percentile speed(mph) .. 30
Range of speeds(mph) not reported
10-mile pace speed 31-40
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 67%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 6
Total collision rate per MVMT 2.16
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.61 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks N
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. 15 MPH ADVISORY SPEED AT ELBOW Vicinity to school.or other activity area N •
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 40
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans 41110)
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: --r
ltl i #v`�r1 litteirik a_
,.i ps-A ▪ ill „ 4,1w
▪O; �* jyJ. e 100 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:19th St Seg.09
LIMITS:between Mountain Ave and Euclid Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB Wa COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
•
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/MIL) H _ H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y _ Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 5248
Length of segment(miles) 1,09
Speed Characteristics
55th percentile speed(mph) 39
50th percentile speed(mph) 35 •
15th percentile speed(mph) 33 '
.Range of speeds(mph) 30-44 1i
10-mile pace speed 32-41
1 Percent in 10-mile pace speed 93%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months ' Total number of collisions 15
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.92
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N 1 Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y I
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y •
Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds V • Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed Limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans efeE 'lc 4 -4
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By:
it L /7 ./in.
, ,, , , ,,,; ,
.,. . ,......,. ',
•
age 101 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:19th St Seg.10 •
•
LIMITS:between Euclid Ave and Campus Ave(W) j DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED I Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking N N
Posted speed Limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/MIL) H L
Curb artd gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illut€oration midblock Y Y • Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes _ N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 8904
Length of segment(miles) 0.47 •
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 42
50th percentile speed(mph) 38
15th percentile speed(mph) 35
Range of speeds(mph) 28-48
10-mile pace speed 33.42
Percent in 10-mite pace speed 88% I Collision Analysis tor recent 36 months 1 Total number of collisions 13
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.71
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high' N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access
Y i
On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. Y(ELBOW) Vicinity to school or other activity area N DRAINAGE CANAL I
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) ADJACENT Recommended speed limit(mph) 35 I Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caftrans ,F,,.,.,- ;.; w,, "fikofM3Siatite
j.„,$)cer .„. . 1
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: ``z;, i' flfrl ) I
age 102 of 705
Or CA.'

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:19th St Seg.11
LIMITS:Campus Ave(E)and Cucamonga Creek
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 72'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median
Raised Median Y
On-street parking N
Posted speed limit(mph) NONE(45 FROM RC) Surrounding land uses COM/RES COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(HIM1L) M M
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y Y
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 16003
Length of segment(miles) 0.69
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 47
50th percentile speed(mph) 41
15th percentile speed(mph) 35
Range of speeds(mph) 35.53
10-mite pace speed 36-45
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 67%
Collision Analysis for recent36 months
Total number of collisions 7
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.52
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.64 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activitylaccess Y On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. Y Vicinity to school or other activity area •
N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N j Recommended speed limit(mph) 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver NATURE TRAIL NEARBY *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: i126 r �1
tr
•r111r
i.� ® c2 age 103 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:lath St Seg.12
LIMITS:Benson Ave and Sunnybrook Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet)
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y •
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES/SCHOOL
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(HiM/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblocl< Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2588
Length of segment(miles) 2.12
Speed Characteristics
B5th percentile speed(mph) 35 ,
50th percentile speed(mph) 32 •
15th percentile speed(mph) 28 •
Range of speeds(mph) 24-40
10-mile pace speed 28-37
Percent in 10-mile pace speed BB%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 2
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.22
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N -
Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N • Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.)
Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans `.fry.

Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: !j' •
i i\ 9 26 f .
, •
i
N.
�1., _ i FYI Q'�< ;%`::
. C �a� . Page 104 of 705
�'1

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDYTRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Colonies Parkway Seg.13
LIMITS:Campus Ave and 19th St
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB/NB WB/SI3 COMBINED Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 44'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median Y(AT N/S ENDS(
On-street parking
N
Posted speed limit(mph) 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access N N Frequency of driveways(t/MIL) L L
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y Y
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 4424
Length of segment(miles) 1.27
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 42
50th percentile speed(mph) 38
15th percentile speed(mph) 33
Range of speeds(mph) 26-49
10-mile pace speed 34-43
Percent in 10-mile pace speed _ 75% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 5
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.33
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Commercial area pedestrian activity/access Y On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N , Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. Y Vicinity to school or other activity area N Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) NATURE TRAILS NEARBY Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver V *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caftrans r y .-,; r;� ,I,l ;y l 1111°C,.. ��
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: 7
if! R'te 'e 21 A,' f;I1
`.h .I' ‘Ct .' e 105 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:17th St Seg.14 1
LIMITS:Mountain Ave and Campus Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB/NB WB/S6 COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
_Surrounding land uses RES RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(HIM/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y •
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y _ Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2040
Length of segment(miles) 1.65
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 41
50th percentile speed(mph) 36
15th percentile speed(mph) 31
Range of speeds{mph) 26-46
10-mile pace speed 32-41
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 72% .

Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 12
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.67
Average crash rate for this hwy dlassification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? _ N Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) • Recommended speed limit(mph} 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans r-^"".5.-—1`--,, Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: i; „ r 1, 3 _\ 19'Z41
{nu !'
'F CP1V� Page 106 of 705

•

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:16th St(Baseline) Seg.15
LIMITS:CA-210 and Euclid Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 64
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median Y i
On-street parking PARTIAL N
Posted speed limit(mph) 45 45
Surrounding land uses RES/COM RES/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y • Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) M M
Curb and gutter present Y Y
'Sidewalks present Y Y
Street iltutimation midi lock Y Y
iStreet illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes PARTIAL PARTIAL
Two-way deity traffic volume(ADT) 16656
Length of segment(miles) 2,43 1-
Speed Characteristics
I
85th percentile speed(mph) 48
50th percentile speed(mph) 44
15th percentile speed(mph) 40
Flange of speeds(mph) 34-53
•
10-mile pace speed 40-49 •
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 82%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 54
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.8
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.77-0.93 . •
Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions _ _
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parkingwith potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans e,„
aaD VVV"' Y1MY.°� J
/y'ik1+I 440
liPrepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By:
.\* 4 -j-
1+ ‘Cia
OW age 107 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STU DY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:16th St Seg.16
LIMITS:Euclid Ave and Tanglewood Ave
1 DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED 1 Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 64
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y ,
Raised Median N(Raised near Campus)
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) — 45 45
Surrounding land uses RES/IND RESICOM/GOLF
Does surrounding land use have direct access YIN YIN Frequency of driveways(HIMIL) M M • •
Curb and gutter present Y Y •
•
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street Mutt-nation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y Y BLENDSAT2NDAVE
__..___—.

Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 19764
Length of segment(miles) 1.52
_Seed Characteristics -,
B5th percentile speed(mph) . . 47
50th percentile speed(mph) 43
_15th percentile speed(mph) 38
Range of speeds(mph) 32-55
10-mile pace speed 38-47
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 77Va
Collision Analysis for recent36 months _
Total number of collisions 35
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.64
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.77 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks N
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access Y On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts . . N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area CHURCH Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver „..:.r- ;.. N *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caftrans VEa'5� 'G , 42 1.

Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: fri \ r�:1
it 1
•.* E -3&y 74 .ti
j FT,
or Giko, ;�,,,e.age 108 of 705

II
CITY OF UPLAND •

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:15th St Seg.17
LIMITS:Benson Ave and Euclid Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES/SCHOOL/PARK RES/SCHOOL Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y • Frequency of driveways(H1M/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y •
Sidewalks present Y Y •
Street illutimation midblock Y Y i Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2711
Length of segment(mites) 1.7
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 41
50th percentile speed(mph) 37_
15th percentile speed(mph) 31
Range of speeds(mph) 27-46 I
10-mile pace speed 33-42
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 76%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 19
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.77
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access
N
On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area SCHOOL,COMMUNITY CENTER,CHURCH Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.)
Recommended speed limit(mph) _ 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caftrans , L Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: ( . ) ;"1 •1/1. :b1:407
•
,,qZ c
o c oF , age 109 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
I
ROADWAY:15th St Seg.18 !
LIMITS:Euclid Ave and Campus Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: E3 WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES!PARK RES/IND/COM Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) H _ H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Tw_o-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2230
Length of segment(miles) 0.55
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) A2
50th percentile speed(mph) 36 1
15th percentile speed(mph) 32
Range of speeds(mph) 28-49
10-mile pace speed 32-41
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 67%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 10
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.86
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
e
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc, N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.)
Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans -_= s.7-.. „" ' ,GE I: . '1/4",
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: •

0., o'
:;;`,` tea( 0,.
®�S age 110 of 705 1
7,

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:14th St Seg.19
LIMITS: airwood Way and Campus Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y Y
Raised Median N N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES/SCHOOL
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(HIM/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2323
Length of segment(miles) 1.99
Speed Characteristics -_-
85th percentile speed(mph) 40
•
50th percentile speed(mph) 35
15th percentile speed(mph) 31
Range of speeds(mph) 27-45
10-mile pace speed 29-38
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 75%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 21
Total collision rate per MVMT 2.32
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? Y
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N j On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area • Y
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) • Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caftrans Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: ` ? / , '' A
21 •
•
age 111 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
I
ROADWAY:14th St Seg.20 i
LIMITS:Campus Ave and Grove Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED • Roadway Characteristics •
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y Y
Raised Median N N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES/LANDFILL
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y , Frequency of driveways(H1M/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2806
Length of segment(mites) 0,7 •
Speed Characteristics
B5th percentile speed(mph) 40
50th percentile speed(mph) 36
,15th percentile speed(mph) 32
_Range of speeds(mph) 26-47
10-mite pace speed 31-40
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 79%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months 1 Total number of collisions 9
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.39
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parkingwith potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.)
Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans „F�r',—i -* li' - . .
•
•
.g
s.

Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: f • f •
I*, .wci: •
a 4'''Page 112 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
!
ROADWAY:13th St Seg.21
LIMITS:Benson Ave and Campus Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y Y
Raised Median N N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES RES/SCHOOL
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(HIM/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y '
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street Illutiwation midblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N 1
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 4828
Length of segment(miles) 2.25
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 39
50th percentile speed(mph) 34
15th percentile speed(mph) 28
Range of speeds(mph) 22-44
10-mite pace speed 30-39
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 72%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months i Total number of collisions 37
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.68
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions __
Crosswalks _ . Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Conslstencywith adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc- N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver _ Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on Catifornra State Highways-Caitrans .u ,.. c,rs „,, i 49 `4:: 7: .

Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By:
•
`' " 'C41 '- -'age 113 of 705

•

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Foothill Blvd Seg.22
LIMITS:Monte Vista to Euclid
DIRECTION or-TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 76.96 •
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2-3 2.3 Painted Median Y Y
Raised Median Y Y •
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph( 45 45 •
Surrounding land uses MU/COM MU/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access N N -_____ Frequency of driveways(HIM/L) M M
Curb and gutter present Y(MAJORITY) Y(MAJORITY) Sidewalks present Y(MAJORITY) Y(MAJORITY)
Street Muth-nation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y Y
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 28528
Length of segment(miles) 2.71
Speed Characteristics
B5th percentile speed(mph) 43 41 42
50th percentile speed)mph) 39 36 37
15th percentile speed(mph) 34 33 34
•
Range ofspeeds(mph) 30-49 29-48 29-49 I
10-mile pace speed 34-43 29-38 33-42
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 78% 82% 76% Collision Analysis for recent 3S months
Total number of collisions 127
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.22
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.31-0.93 s collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks - Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access Y i On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N .

Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y 1 Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N • Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) Y Recommended speed limit(mph) 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver _ N I *Source:2020 Crash Data on Calf /tia State Highways-Caltrans "_ =$` A,
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: l fiti. 'ar CAS-V Page 114 of 705

i
1 CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Foothill Blvd Seg,23 1
LIMITS:Euclid Ave and Grove
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB W3 COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
•
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 76
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 i Painted Median Y I
Raised Median Y
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 45 45
Surrounding land uses COM/REC/HOSPITAL COM/REC Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y _ Frequency of driveways(H/MIL) M M
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y •
•
•
Street Illutimation midblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y Y
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 28799
Length of segment(miles) 1.29
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 44
50th percentile speed(mph) 40
15th percentile speed(mph) 37
Range of speeds(mph) ____ 34-51
10-mile pace speed 36.45
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 83%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 100
Total collision rate per MVMT

0.33 Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.31-0.93 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N •
Commercial area pedestrian activity/access Y On-street parkingwith potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y , Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N _ Recommended speed limit(mph) " 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans " fi` ._ pi.!,19.,1411±V
/3,#) 91:77,-E II: (Ole_
W.

I(ig
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: ,„
`.4 .1 a . ,r, d .eir."
.'tip r 1
at 0ik0* age 115 of 705
1 CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
i
ROADWAY:11th St Seg.24
LIMITS:Monte Vista to Benson
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 44
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y . Y
Posted speed Limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses iND/COM/RES RES/COM/IND Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y i Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 4248
Length of segment(miles) 1
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 38
50th percentile speed(mph) 34
15th percentile speed(mph) _ 30
Range of speeds(mph) 24-43
10-mile pace speed 31-40
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 7 7%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 13
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.58
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caitrans Tr a _, ziel,00 -ci.
am`
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: • ` F
� v� � „
, ,,
( c ®t` Page 116 of 705 1

•
1 CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDYTRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:11th St Seg.25
•
LIMITS:Benson Ave to Hospital Pkwy
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y •
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35

RESI SCHOOL/
Surrounding land uses HOSPITAL RES/SCHOOL/PARK Does surrounding land use have direct access Y _ Y Frequency of driveways(H/MIL) H H
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
-
Street Illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N •
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 4999 ' Length of segment(miles) 2.52
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 35
50th percentile speed(mph) 31
15th percentile speed(mph) 27
Range of speeds(mph) __
23"44
ID-mile pace speed 26-35
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 81%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 46
Total collision rate per MVMT 2.45
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? Y
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y i
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y • Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y -
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans •
•
••
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: al., * g,,
:` �k °` age 117 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND
•
SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM •
ROADWAY:Arrow Rte I Hwy Seg.26 •
LIMITS:Claremont Blvd to Central Ave ,
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet} 64
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1-2 1-2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median West of Monte Vista
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 45 45
Surrounding land uses COM/RES/FLOOD IN D/FLOOD/REC Does surrounding land use have direct access N N Frequency of driveways(HIM/L) M M • Except-1000'
Curb and gutter present Y Y undeveloped area Sidewalks present Y(MAJORITY) N
Street lllutimationmidblock Y(MAJORITY) Y(MAJORITY) NO SL @ FLOOD BASIN Street illumination at intersection Y Y , Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT} 6370
Length of segment(miles) 0.76
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed{mph) 46
50th percentile speed(mph) 40
15th percentile speed{mph) 34
Range of speeds{mph)
10-mile pace speed 36-4.5
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 67%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 8
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.9
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.31-1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks N
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N .

Vicinity to school or other activity area N • Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) VARYING ROADWAY WIDTH UN DEVELOPED SECTION Recommended speed limit(mph) 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans Qq,qff 3
4,
, .';�.

Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: p , 1 -;.,;l .:,,.r212, 1 • ,r,
*. Exp .- 0° � '
`F=`? Coo CM,� ,, ge 118 of 705

•

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Arrow Rte/Hwy Seg.27
LIMITS:Central to San Antonio
DIRECTION OFTRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 64
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y •
Raised Median N •
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 40 40
Surrounding land uses RES/COM RES/COM/IND Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) M M
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y Y
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT)
Length of segment(miles)
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 41 42 41
50th percentile speed(mph) 37 37 37
15th percentile speed(mph) 33 34 34
Range of speeds(mph) 27-46 29-47 27-47
10-mile pace speed 35-44 34-43 32-41
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 82% 80% 81% Collision Analysis for recent36 months
Total number of collisions 37
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.77
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.00 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) • Recommended speed limit(mph) 40
Conditions not readily apparent to driver
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans •
4,414GE 7:
ate `-' c; •
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: � � •. 212 ,711
6 �► ge 119 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Arrow Hwy Seg.28
LIMITS:San Antonio to Grove •
DIRECTION OE TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 40'-48' Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 • Painted Median Y •
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y n (MAJORITY) Posted speed limit(mph) 35/40 35/40
Surrounding land uses RES/INST RES/SCHOOL ICOM Dees surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(HIMlL) M M
Curb and gutter present Y Y
_Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation mldblock n Y Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 13532 • Length of segment(miles) 1.86
•
Speed Characteristics _
85th percentile speed(mph) 37 •
50th percentile speed(mph) 34
15th percentile speed(mph) 31
Range of speeds(mph) 27-45
10-mile pace speed 29-38
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 89%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months a 1 Total number of collisions 76 I Total collision rate per MVMT 2.18
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07-1.61 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions •
Crosswalks Y
i
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N n I On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y • Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y • Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.)
Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y I
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Ca(trans ^w 8/ t
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: , r I,E ,f � •
'„„'.1:1
i.
y1c � - 'e120of705

CITY OF UPLAND
•

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
•
ROADWAY:San Bernardino Rd Seg.29
LIMITS:Arrow Hwy to Grove Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 36'-50` Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y(PARTIAL) Y{PARTIAL) T Posted speed limit(mph) _ 35 35 • Surrounding land uses OFF/RES RES l REC/HOSPITAL Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(HIM/L) L L i Curb and gutter present Y Y ..

Sidewalks present Y Y(MAJORITY)
•
Street lllutimatlon midblock Y Y • Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 9113
Length of segment(miles) 0.74 T.

Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 39
50th percentile speed(mph)
3s
15th percentile speed(mph) 32
Range of speeds(mph)
28-45
10-mite pace speed 31-40 '
I
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 83%
Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 10 • •
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.35
Average crash rate for this hwy classification{per MVMT)* 1.07 • Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N1 Commercial area pedestrian activity/access Y On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds _ Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N • Vicinity to school or other activity area Y Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.)
Recommended speed limit(mph) 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans .g ,�„-.,. 410, ‘
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: r i rh 0, `°U, ' '� �'(4 `,.e 121 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:9th St Seg.#30
LIMITS:between Central Ave and Euclid Ave i DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 24'-64 Number of through travel lanes by direction 1-2 1-2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y(VARIES)
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35

RES/COM/CHURCH/ RES/COM/CHURCH/
Surrounding land uses SCHOOL SCHOOL
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) FREQUENT FREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y(MAJORITY) Y(MAJORITY) • Street illutimation midbiock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike Janes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT)
7,723
Length of segment(miles) 2.23
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed{mph) 38 37 38
50th percentile speed(mph) 34 34 34
15th percentile speed(mph) 28 30 29
Range ofspeeds(mph) 24-42 26-45 24.46
10-mile pace speed 31-40 28-37 30-39
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 74% 84% 77% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 44
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.41
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07-1.61 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts - N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 35 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Coltrans ,,,r."IS., •,-„y, . "c:i p r 2 E es'N'
Prepared B : Reviewed By.
p Y //1 J
i
ge 122 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
•
ROADWAY:9th St Seg.#31
LIMITS:between 3rd Ave and Grove Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 49'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1-2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median Y
On-street parking Y Y
•
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35
Surrounding land uses RES/COM RES/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) FREQUENT FREQUENT • Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation mldbiock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 7,610
Length of segment(miles) 1.07
-
Speed Characteristics _.
85th percentile speed(mph) 41 39 40
50th percentile speed(mph) 36 34 36
15th percentile speed(mph) Y 32 31 31 Range of speeds(mph) 27-46 24-44 24-46
10-mile pace speed 32-41 31-40 30-39
Percent In 10-mile pace speed ^me_� 78% 78% 75% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 26 ;
Total collision rate per MVMT 2.69
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? Y l Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc, N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 35 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y Y
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans N.
.1 ,to..,, 7.494*
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
•
No. 2126
C -•''loge 123 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:8th St Seg.#32
LIMITS:between Benson Ave and San Antonio Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 73
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 I Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y(MAJORITY) Y(MAJORITY)
Posted speed limit(mph) 40 40
Surrounding land uses RES/COM RES/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y j Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) FREQUENT FREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y 1
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation mldblock _ Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 17,194
Length of segment(miles) 1.15
Speed Characteristics -
85th percentile speed(mph) 47 47 47
50th percentile speed(mph) 42 44 43
15th percentile speed(mph) 38 38 38
Range of speeds(mph) 32-52 31-52 31-52
10-mile pace speed 38-47 38-47 38-47
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 80% 78% 79% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 38
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.29
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)'" 1.00 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity _ Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access _ N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 40 40
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y Y
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-CaltransSa� ;4,4," z a.-7( \.,
11 (Ph 4r10 r-
Prepared By: Reviewed By: t.
,(7 I/2116 ,..'
• Page 124 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:8th St Seg.#33 I
LIMITS:between San Antonio Ave and East City Limit
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet} 39'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y •
Posted speed limit(mph) 35 35 •
Surrounding land uses RES/COM RES/COM • Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) FREQUENT FREQUENT •
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 11,535
Length of segment(miles) 1.57
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 35 36 35
50th percentile speed(mph) 33 33 33
15th percentile speed(mph) 30 30 30
Range ofspeeds(mph) 26-39 28-41 26-41
10-mile pace speed 29-38 28-37 28-37
Percent In 10-mile pace speed _ 88% 96% 92% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 39
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.19
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N T
Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 35 35
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans _ Prepared By: Reviewed By: �` br .
,,ilild If
•
;, NJ,./5 2126
•
_PIN. ®G ,.' OF CO !
��. e 125 of 705

•

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY: 7th St Seg.#34
LIMITS:between Benson Ave and Mountain Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB We COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 64'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 I Painted Median Y
Raised Median mm N
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 40 40
Surrounding land uses COM COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) FREQUENT FREQUENT • Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street iliutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 11,837 .

Length of segment(relies) 0.61
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 37 34 36
Seth percentile speed(mph) 41 41 41
15th percentile speed(mph) 27 2.9 27
Range of speeds(mph) _ 32-53 30-50 30-53
10-mile pace speed _ 39-46 34-43 38-47
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 68% 72% 68% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 29
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.64
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.00 Is collision rate abnormally high? N _
Other Special Conditions i
Crosswalks _ Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 40 40
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans � a8
.I'd \C.r.V TA- 0
Prepared By: Reviewed By: y ,.

A1ys fit..;;'
°=u_t-geimage 126 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY: 7th St Seg.kf 35
LIMITS:between Harrington and Grove Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EB WB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 36'-40' I Number of through trave lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 30 30
Surrounding land uses e RES/SCHOOL RES/OFF Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) H H • Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street Illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 10,724
Length of segment(miles) 1.87
Speed Characteristics _
85th percentile speed(mph) 34 35 34
50th percentile speed(mph) 31 31 31
15th percentile speed(mph) 27 29 27
Range of speeds(mph) 23-40 25-41 23-41
10-mile pace speed 25-34 38-37 26-35
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 84% 86% 84% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 43
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.73
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
. . l
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity Y Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds Y Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc, N Vicinity to school or other activity area Y
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N.

Recommended speed limit(mph) 30
Conditions not readily apparent to driver Y *Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans ,`',0 ` :'r,rr y.zF
ig#
Prepared By: Harry Parr Reviewed By: ittOpir, ?-0 WO 1
•. , �a ' is
' Al
\'a eP � .I?
-k s:,,2,,'L......�.- .. �,"e 127 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY: Monte Vista Ave Seg.#36
LIMITS:between Foothill Blvd and Pacific Electric Trail DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 110' Number of through travel lanes by direction 3 3 Painted Median N
Raised Median Y
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 45 45
•
Surrounding land uses COM COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y • Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) INFREQUENT INFREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y Y
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 14,727
Length of segment(miles) 0.74
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph)n 43 45 44
50th percentile speed(mph) 38 _ 40 39 15th percentile speed(mph) 35 36 36
Range ofspeeds(mph) 32-45 32-49 32-49
10-mile pace speed 35-44 36-45 35-44
Percent in 10-tulle pace speed 86% 80% 81% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 13
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.48
•
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0,87 • Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access - N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N •
Recommended speed limit(mph) 45 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans gg.� e+'�S.lr.P�;�;/g�h
.�S.'r`Z B� :;t
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
& , 47--..41 ,11‘1\
O. 2126 ;i
,
"� i :ACI
'`p r CO 128 of 705

•

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY: Central Ave Seg.#37
LIMITS:between Foothill Blvd and 9th St
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics i
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 72'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median Y
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 40 40
Surrounding land uses IND/COM IND/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) INFREQUENT INFREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation mldblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection _ Y Y Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 12,601
Length of segment(miles) 0.82
Speed Characteristics ,
85th percentile speed(mph) 46 44 . 44
50th percentile speed(mph) 39 40 39
15th percentile speed(mph) 35 36 35
Range ofspeeds(mph) 31-48 32-48 20-43
10-mlle pace speed 34-43 36-45 35-44 • •
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 76% 84% 78% • Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 24
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.61 ' Average crash rate for this hwy classification per MVMT)* 1,00 Is collision rate abnormally high? N • •
•
Other Special Conditions
•
Crosswalks Y
•
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N • On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N •
Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 40 40
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State High ways-Caltrans :-..-*,;--71,-;7 1
Prepared By: Reviewed By: °'*+F C
•
``$ GAFF®CP �` "
cA ge 129 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Deakin Ave Seg.#38
LIMITS:between 24th St and Mildura Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 44'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking Y Y
Posted speed limit(mph) 30 30
Surrounding land uses RES RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access N N Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) INFREQUENT INFREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection V Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 735
Length of segment(miles) 0.27
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 37 38 38
50th percentile speed(mph) 32 32 32
15th percentile speed(mph) 27 27 27
Range ofspeeds(mph) 21-42 20-43 20-43
10-mile pace speed 25-34 30-39 25-34
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 80% 68% 78% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 0
Total collision rate per MVMT 0
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 is collision rate abnormally high? N _
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks N
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts Y Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. Y Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 30 30
Conditions not readily apparent to driver y Y
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans /4 "E. 4 ...--k-
., /04%14
/01,01iON:ES:971.40,'.

Prepared By: Reviewed By:
e 30of705

CITY OF UPLAND •
•

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Mildura Ave Seg.#39
LIMITS:between Benson Ave and Mountain Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 45'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 1 1 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 30 30
Surrounding land uses RES RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access• Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) INFREQUENT INFREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street Illutimation midblock v Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 2,211
Length of segment(miles) 0.94
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 40 42 41
50th percentile speed(mph) 34 36 35
15th percentile speed(mph) 32 31 31
Range of speeds(mph) 27-45 27-48 32-48
10-milepacespeed 31-40 31-40 31-40
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 82% 70% 76% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 10
Total collision rate per MVMT 2.09
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.07 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts _ N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds _ N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc.

Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc,) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 30 30
Conditions not readily apparent to driver v Y
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans triofES.ss
Prepared By: Reviewed By:

No. 2126
° 131 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Benson Ave Seg.#40
LIMITS:between 18th St and Mountain Ave
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 64`-90' Number of through travel lanes by direction 1-2 1-2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median Y
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 40 40
Surrounding land uses RES/CHURCH RES _ Does surrounding land use have direct access N N Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) INFREQUENT INFREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street Illutimatlon midblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y(SEPARATE BIKE PATH) Y(SEPARATE BIKE PATH) Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 6,775
Length of segment(miles) 1,13
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 50 51 50
50th percentile speed(mph) 45 _ 44 46
15th percentile speed(mph) 43 40 41
Range of speeds(mph) 37-55 34-56 32-48
10-mile pace speed 41-50 39-48 41-50
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 82% 70% 73% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 6
Total collision rate per MVMT 9.64
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* _ 0,64 Is collision rate abnormally high? N • Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity V N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. Y Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 40 40
Conditions not readily apparent to driver v v
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans Prepared By: Reviewed By:
fit m
` _ Gr/
, ;.. A
2 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Benson Ave Seg.#41
LIMITS:between 18th St and Foothill Blvd
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 64'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median N
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 45 45
Surrounding land uses COM/AIRPORT _ COM/AIRPORT Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) INFREQUENT INFREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at Intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 17,841
Length of segment(miles) 1.51
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 43 42 43
50th percentile speed(mph) 39 39 39
15th percentile speed(mph) 36 33 35
Range ofspeeds(mph) 32-47 32-48 32-48
10-mile pace speed 36-45 34-43 41-50
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 84% 94% 89% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 33
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.75
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.31 Is collision rate abnormally high? J
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 45 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans •
Prepared By: Reviewed By: rrC5r
a
k; e,n. e 133 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Benson Ave Seg.#42
LIMITS:between Foothill Blvd and 1-10
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 64'-84' Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y (MAJORITY)

Y(BETWEEN MORENO
Raised Median AND ARROW)
On-street parking Y(VARIES) Y(VARIES)
Posted speed lImlt(mph) 40 40
Surrounding land uses COM/RES COM/RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) INFREQUENT INFREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 19,148
Length of segment(miles) 1.34
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 43 42 43
50th percentile speed(mph) 39 38 39
15th percentile speed(mph) 36 35 35
Range of speeds(mph) 32-47 32-48 32-48
10-mile pace speed • 36-45 _ 34-43 34-43
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 84% 94% 89% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 52
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.30
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 1.00 Is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area • N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 40 • 40
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans •
Prepared By: Reviewed By: trio G j,I I No. 21 Z
3 - ®- ice_e ,Nk,k
ff
� "^ i R '''1 34 of 705
� ,� :ate-

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Mountain Ave Seg.4 43
LIMITS:between 16th St and 23rd St
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 80'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median Y
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 45 45
Surrounding land uses RES RES
Does surrounding land use have direct access N N Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) NONE NONE
Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y y
Street illutimation mldblock Y Y
Street Illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes Y Y
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 13,794
Length of segment(miles) 1.75
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 54 49 51
50th percentile speed(mph) _ 47 45 45 15th percentile speed(mph) 42 38 40
Range of speeds(mph) 37-58 32-53 32-58
10-mile pace speed 42-51 41-50 41-50
Percent In 10-mile pace speed 66% 74% 68% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months
Total number of collisions 26
Total collision rate per MVMT 0.47
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.93 Is collision rate abnormally high?
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) is Recommended speed limit(mph) 45 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans Prepared By: Reviewed By: (; -- -
I 11.

No. 21 26
;1_ = 'e 135 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Mou ntain Ave Seg.#44
LIMITS:between 16th St and Foothill Blvd
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 86'
Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 2 Painted Median Y
Raised Median Y
On-street parking N N
Posted speed Emit(mph) 45 45
Surrounding land uses RES/COM RES/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y • Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) FREQUENT FREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation mldblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 22,652
Length of segment(miles) 1.00
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 46 47 46
50th percentile speed(mph) 40 42 41
15th percentile speed(mph) 37 37 37
Range of speeds(mph) 35.51 34-52 34-52
10-mile pace speed 37.45 38-47 37-46
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 80% 74% 77% Collision Analysis for recent 35 months
Total number of collisions _ 38
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.02
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0,93 is collision rate abnormally high? N
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 45 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans 4,,,t..4*-!ES,q,16-4 -,.m.;.,,,_Y
V
zpeita .4e,y. „,
.4..., . I.."
Prepared By: Reviewed By: e..,/
I, i4gin 2126
-r-_r, Page 136 of 705

CITY OF UPLAND

SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
ROADWAY:Mountain Ave Seg.#t 45
LIMITS:between Foothill Blvd and 1-10 Freeway
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NB SB COMBINED
Roadway Characteristics
Total Curb-To-Curb Street Width(feet) 86
Number of through travel lanes by direction 3 3 .

Painted Median Y
Raised Median Y 1
On-street parking N N
Posted speed limit(mph) 40 40
•
Surrounding land uses RES/COM RES/COM
Does surrounding land use have direct access Y Y Frequency of driveways(H/M/L) FREQUENT FREQUENT Curb and gutter present Y Y
Sidewalks present Y Y
Street illutimation midblock Y Y
Street illumination at intersection Y Y
Bike lanes N N
Two-way daily traffic volume(ADT) 34,667
Length of segment(miles) 1.25
Speed Characteristics
85th percentile speed(mph) 45 46 46
50th percentile speed(mph) 40 41 41
15th percentile speed(mph) 36 37 36
Range of speeds(mph) 31-49 34-49 31-49
10-mile pace speed 35-44 36-45 36-45
Percent in 10-mile pace speed 80% 78% 78% Collision Analysis for recent 36 months _
Total number of collisions 102
Total collision rate per MVMT 1.60
Average crash rate for this hwy classification(per MVMT)* 0.75 Is collision rate abnormally high? Y
Other Special Conditions
Crosswalks Y
Residential area or direct residential access with pedestrian activity N Commercial area pedestrian activity/access N On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts N Consistency with adjacent roadway segment speeds N Roadway alignment,horizontal,or vertical curves,etc. N _ Vicinity to school or other activity area N
Other(Lack of Sidewalks,Open drainage,etc.) N Recommended speed limit(mph) 45 45
Conditions not readily apparent to driver N N
*Source:2020 Crash Data on California State Highways-Caltrans gekDE S$SZ (146),GE 1:4,7' \
A,
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
kNo. 2126
k exp
4,34

Page 137 of 705 ends

Upland City CouncilJanuary 27, 2025

Upland City Council
January 27, 2025