Agenda packet — Upland City Council, October 13, 2025 (part 3 of 3)

Project X REPORT S241008H
Corrosion Engineering Page 1
Corrosion Control – Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab

29990 Technology Dr, Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com
Results Only Soil Testing
for
Multi-Level Parking Structure
Development

October 9, 2024

Prepared for:

Eddy Cuevas
GeoTek USA
1548 N. Maple Avenue
Corona, CA 92878
[email protected], [email protected]

Project X Job#: S241008H
Client Job or PO#: 4049-CR

Prepared by:

D. Bobrova

Respectfully Submitted,

Eduardo Hernandez, M.Sc., P.E.

Sr. Corrosion Consultant
NACE Corrosion Technologist #16592
Professional Engineer
California No. M37102
[email protected]

Page 281 of 475 ends

Project X REPORT S241008H
Corrosion Engineering Page 2
Corrosion Control – Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab

29990 Technology Dr., Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com

Soil Analysis Lab Results
Client: GeoTek USA
Job Name: Multi-Level Parking Structure Development
Client Job Number: 4049-CR
Project X Job Number: S241008H
October 9, 2024

Method ASTM
G51
ASTM
G200
SM
4500-D
ASTM
D4327
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D4327
ASTM
D4327
Bore# /
Description
Depth pH Redox Sulfide
S2-
Nitrate
NO3
-
Ammonium
NH4
+
Lithium
Li+
Sodium
Na+
Potassium
K+
Magnesium
Mg2+
Calcium
Ca2+
Fluoride
F2
2-
Phosphate
PO4
3-
(ft)(mg/kg)(wt%)(mg/kg)(wt%)(Ω-cm)(Ω-cm)(mV)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg) B-1 0-5 30.8 0.0031 11.5 0.0012 73,700 10,050 8.1 176 0.8 10.5 2.9 ND 11.7 41.3 8.0 119.7 6.0 22.8 ASTM
G187
ASTM
D4327
ASTM
D4327
Resistivity
As Rec'd | Minimum
Sulfates
SO4
2-
Chlorides
Cl-

Cations and Anions, except Sulfide and Bicarbonate, tested with Ion Chromatography mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) of dry soil weight ND = 0 = Not Detected | NT = Not Tested | Unk = Unknown Chemical Analysis performed on 1:3 Soil-To-Water extract PPM = mg/kg (soil) = mg/L (Liquid)

Note: Sometimes a bad sulfate hit is a contaminated spot. Typical fertilizers are Potassium chloride, ammonium sulfate or ammoni um sulfate nitrate (ASN). So this is another reason why testing full corrosion series is good because we then have the data to see if those other ingredients are present meaning the soil sample is just fertilizer- contaminated soil. This can happen often when the soil samples collected are simply surface scoops. This is why it's best to dig in a foot, throw away the top and test the deeper stuff. Dairy farms are also notorious for these items.

If one sample pops up much more corrosive than all others, we would recommend collecting more samples surrounding the problem sample location to determine if the peak is isolated to it. This allows us to conclude it was a contaminated sample and able to declare it an outlier.

Try out our new online forms: SOIL CORROSIVITY & THERMAL RESISTIVITY LAB REQUEST FORM & IN-SITU WENNER 4 PIN QUOTE REQUEST FORM

Page 282 of 475 ends

APPENDIX C

INFILTRATION TEST DATA & PORCHET CALCULATIONS

Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation
Proposed Multi-Level Parking Structure
Assessor’s Parcel Number 1046-040-208, -207, -206, -205, -203, & -202 City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California
Project No. 4049-CR

Page 283 of 475 ends

Project:Job No.:4049-CR
Test Hole No.:Tested By:Date:10/1/2024
Depth of Hole As Drilled: Before Test:After Test:120"
Reading
No. Time
Time
Interval
(Min)
Total
Depth
of Hole
(Inches)
Initial
Water Level
(Inches)
Final
Water
Level
(Inches)
Δ in Water
Level
(Inches)
Rate
(Minutes
per Inch)
11:30 AM 120 24
11:55 AM 25 0 24
11:56 AM 120 24
12:21 PM 25 0 24
12:22 PM 120 24
12:27 PM 5 0.84 23.16
12:28 PM 120 24
12:33 PM 5 2.64 21.36
12:34 PM 120 24
12:39 PM 5 3.36 20.64
12:40 PM 120 24
12:45 PM 5 3.48 20.52
12:46 PM 120 24
12:51 PM 5 3.72 20.28
12:52 PM 120 24
12:57 PM 5 3.72 20.28
6 0.25
4 0.24
5 0.25
2 0.23
3 0.24
Trial N/A
1 0.22
Comments
Trial N/A Pre-soaked with 5+ gallons
of clear water prior to Trials
120"120"

PERCOLATION DATA SHEET
Multi-Level Parking Structure Development
I-1 JC

Page 284 of 475 ends

Project:Job No.:4049-CR
Test Hole No.:Tested By:Date:10/1/2024
Depth of Hole As Drilled: Before Test:After Test:180"
Reading
No. Time
Time
Interval
(Min)
Total
Depth
of Hole
(Inches)
Initial
Water Level
(Inches)
Final
Water
Level
(Inches)
Δ in Water
Level
(Inches)
Rate
(Minutes
per Inch)
12:24 PM 180 24
12:49 PM 25 0 24
12:50 PM 180 24
1:15 PM 25 0 24
1:16 PM 180 24
1:26 PM 10 0 24
1:27 PM 180 24
1:37 PM 10 0.96 23.04
1:38 PM 180 24
1:48 PM 10 1.32 22.68
1:49 PM 180 24
1:59 PM 10 1.8 22.2
2:00 PM 180 24
2:10 PM 10 2.04 21.96
2:11 PM 180 24
2:21 PM 10 2.16 21.84
6 0.46
4 0.45
5 0.46
2 0.43
3 0.44
Trial N/A
1 N/A
Comments
Trial N/A Pre-soaked with 5+ gallons
of clear water prior to Trials
180"180"

PERCOLATION DATA SHEET
Multi-Level Parking Structure Development
I-2 JC

Page 285 of 475 ends

Equation -It =
Havg = (HO+HF)/2 =
It = Inches per Hour30.69
Total Test Hole Depth, DT = 120
ΔH (60r)
Δt (r+2Havg)
HO = DT - DO = 24
HF = DT - DF = 3.72
ΔH = ΔD = HO- HF = 20.28

13.86 Final Depth to Water, DF =116.28
Test Hole Radius, r =4
Initial Depth to Water, DO =96
Time Interval, Δt = 5
Client:Madole & Associates, Inc.

Project:Multi-Level Parking Structure
Project No:4049-CR
Date:10/1/2024
Boring No.I-1
Percolation to Infiltration Rate (Porchet Method)

Page 286 of 475 ends

Equation -It =
Havg = (HO+HF)/2 =
It = Inches per Hour
Time Interval, Δt = 10
Client:Madole & Associates, Inc.

Project:Multi-Level Parking Structure
Project No:4049-CR
Date:10/1/2024
Boring No.I-2
Percolation to Infiltration Rate (Porchet Method)
Final Depth to Water, DF =177.84
Test Hole Radius, r =4
Initial Depth to Water, DO =156

17.38 Total Test Hole Depth, DT = 180
ΔH (60r)
Δt (r+2Havg)
HO = DT - DO = 24
HF = DT - DF = 2.16
ΔH = ΔD = HO- HF = 21.84

13.08

Page 287 of 475 ends

APPENDIX D

GENERAL EARTHWORK GRADING GUIDELINES

Page 288 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-1
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES
Guidelines presented herein are intended to address general construction procedures for earthwork construction. Specific situations and conditions often arise which cannot reasonably be discussed in general guidelines, when anticipated these are discussed in the text of the report. Often unanticipated conditions are encountered which may necessitate modification or changes to these guidelines. It is our hope that these will assist the contractor to more efficiently complete the project by providing a reasonable understanding of the procedures that would be expected during earthwork and the testing and observation used to evaluate those procedures.

General
Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of governing agencies, Chapters 18 and 33 of the Uniform Building Code, CBC (2022) and the guidelines presented below.

Preconstruction Meeting
A preconstruction meeting should be held prior to site earthwork. Any questions the contractor has regarding our recommendations, general site conditions, apparent discrepancies between reported and actual conditions and/or differences in procedures the contractor intends to use should be brought up at that meeting. The contractor (including the main onsite representative) should review our report and these guidelines in advance of the meeting. Any comments the contractor may have regarding these guidelines should be brought up at that meeting.

Grading Observation and Testing

1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by our representative during grading.

Verbal communication during the course of each day will be used to inform the contractor of test results. The contractor should receive a copy of the "Daily Field Report" indicating results of field density tests that day. If our representative does not provide the contractor with these reports, our office should be notified.

2. Testing and observation procedures are, by their nature, specific to the work or area observed and location of the tests taken, variability may occur in other locations. The contractor is responsible for the uniformity of the grading operations; our observations and test results are intended to evaluate the contractor’s overall level of efforts during grading. The contractor’s personnel are the only individuals participating in all aspect of site work. Compaction testing and observation should not be considered as relieving the contractor’s responsibility to properly compact the fill.

3. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations, and subdrains should be observed by our representative prior to placing any fill. It will be the contractor's responsibility to notify our representative or office when such areas are ready for observation.

4. Density tests may be made on the surface material to receive fill, as considered warranted by this firm.

5. In general, density tests would be made at maximum intervals of two feet of fill height or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. Criteria will vary depending on soil conditions and size of the fill.

More frequent testing may be performed. In any case, an adequate number of field density tests should be made to evaluate the required compaction and moisture content is generally being obtained.

Page 289 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-2
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

6. Laboratory testing to support field test procedures will be performed, as considered warranted, based on conditions encountered (e.g. change of material sources, types, etc.) Every effort will be made to process samples in the laboratory as quickly as possible and in progress construction projects are our first priority. However, laboratory workloads may cause in delays and some soils may require a minimum of 48 to 72 hours to complete test procedures.

Whenever possible, our representative(s) should be informed in advance of operational changes that might result in different source areas for materials.

7. Procedures for testing of fill slopes are as follows:
a) Density tests should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the fill, three to five feet horizontally from the face of the slope. b) If a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required compaction is being achieved.

8. Finish grade testing of slopes and pad surfaces should be performed after construction is complete.

Site Clearing

1. All vegetation, and other deleterious materials, should be removed from the site. If material is not immediately removed from the site it should be stockpiled in a designated area(s) well outside of all current work areas and delineated with flagging or other means. Site clearing should be performed in advance of any grading in a specific area.

2. Efforts should be made by the contractor to remove all organic or other deleterious material from the fill, as even the most diligent efforts may result in the incorporation of some materials.

This is especially important when grading is occurring near the natural grade. All equipment operators should be aware of these efforts. Laborers may be required as root pickers.

3. Nonorganic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas provided the procedures used are observed and found acceptable by our representative. Typical procedures are similar to those indicated on Plate D-4.

Treatment of Existing Ground

1. Following site clearing, all surficial deposits of alluvium and colluvium as well as weathered or creep effected bedrock, should be removed (see Plates D-1, D-2 and D-3) unless otherwise specifically indicated in the text of this report.

2. In some cases, removal may be recommended to a specified depth (e.g. flat sites where partial alluvial removals may be sufficient). The contractor should not exceed these depths unless directed otherwise by our representative.

3. Groundwater existing in alluvial areas may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report may be necessary due to saturation during winter months.

4. Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of six inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill standards.

5. Exploratory back hoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located.

Page 290 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-3
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

Subdrainage

1. Subdrainage systems should be provided in canyon bottoms prior to placing fill, and behind buttress and stabilization fills and in other areas indicated in the report. Subdrains should conform to schematic diagrams D-1 and D-5, and be acceptable to our representative.

2. For canyon subdrains, runs less than 500 feet may use six-inch pipe. Typically, runs in excess of 500 feet should have the lower end as eight-inch minimum.

3. Filter material should be clean, 1/2 to 1-inch gravel wrapped in a suitable filter fabric. Class 2 permeable filter material per California Department of Transportation Standards tested by this office to verify its suitability, may be used without filter fabric. A sample of the material should be provided to the Soils Engineer by the contractor at least two working days before it is delivered to the site. The filter should be clean with a wide range of sizes.

4. Approximate delineation of anticipated subdrain locations may be offered at 40-scale plan review stage. During grading, this office would evaluate the necessity of placing additional drains.

5. All subdrainage systems should be observed by our representative during construction and prior to covering with compacted fill.

6. Subdrains should outlet into storm drains where possible. Outlets should be located and protected. The need for backflow preventers should be assessed during construction.

7. Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project surveyors.

Fill Placement

1. Unless otherwise indicated, all site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special processing or handling may be required (see text of report).

2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts six (6) to eight (8) inches in compacted thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a nearly horizontal plane, unless otherwise found acceptable by our representative.

3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that recommended by this firm, the contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the following:
a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture. Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre-watering of cut or removal areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils. The ability of the contractor to obtain the proper moisture content will control production rates.
b) Each six-inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling governmental agency. In most cases, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation D 1557.

4. Rock fragments less than eight inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided:
a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets;
b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the rocks; c) The distribution of the rocks is observed by, and acceptable to, our representative.

5. Rocks exceeding eight (8) inches in diameter should be taken off site, broken into smaller fragments, or placed in accordance with recommendations of this firm in areas designated suitable for rock disposal (see Plate D-4). On projects where significant large quantities of oversized materials are anticipated, alternate guidelines for placement may be included. If

Page 291 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-4
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

significant oversize materials are encountered during construction, these guidelines should be requested.

6. In clay soil, dry or large chunks or blocks are common. If in excess of eight (8) inches minimum dimension, then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break up blocks. When dry, they should be moisture conditioned to provide a uniform condition with the surrounding fill.

Slope Construction

1. The contractor should obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment.

2. Slopes trimmed to the compacted core should be overbuilt by at least three (3) feet with compaction efforts out to the edge of the false slope. Failure to properly compact the outer edge results in trimming not exposing the compacted core and additional compaction after trimming may be necessary.

3. If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods, then the slope construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained throughout construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor should slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades.

Compaction equipment should compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled or otherwise compacted at approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built.

4. Corners and bends in slopes should have special attention during construction as these are the most difficult areas to obtain proper compaction.

5. Cut slopes should be cut to the finished surface. Excessive undercutting and smoothing of the face with fill may necessitate stabilization.

Keyways, Buttress and Stabilization Fills
Keyways are needed to provide support for fill slope and various corrective procedures.

1. Side-hill fills should have an equipment-width key at their toe excavated through all surficial soil and into competent material and tilted back into the hill (Plates D-2, D-3). As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial soil and slopewash, and into competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by our representatives (See Plates D-1, D-2, and D-3).

2. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following manner:
a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the cut-fill interface.
b) A key at least one and one-half (1.5) equipment width wide (or as needed for compaction), and tipped at least one (1) foot into slope, should be excavated into competent materials and observed by our representative. c) The cut portion of the slope should be excavated prior to fill placement to evaluate if stabilization is necessary. The contractor should be responsible for any additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut excavation. (see Plate D-3 for schematic details.)

3. Daylight cut lots above descending natural slopes may require removal and replacement of the outer portion of the lot. A schematic diagram for this condition is presented on Plate D-2.

4. A basal key is needed for fill slopes extending over natural slopes. A schematic diagram for this condition is presented on Plate D-2.

Page 292 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-5
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

5. All fill slopes should be provided with a key unless within the body of a larger overall fill mass.

Please refer to Plate D-3 for specific guidelines.

Anticipated buttress and stabilization fills are discussed in the text of the report. The need to stabilize other proposed cut slopes will be evaluated during construction. Plate D-5 shows a schematic of buttress construction.

1. All backcuts should be excavated at gradients of 1:1 or flatter. The backcut configuration should be determined based on the design, exposed conditions, and need to maintain a minimum fill width and provide working room for the equipment.

2. On longer slopes, backcuts and keyways should be excavated in maximum 250 feet long segments. The specific configurations will be determined during construction.

3. All keys should be a minimum of two (2) feet deep at the toe and slope toward the heel at least one foot or two (2%) percent, whichever is greater.

4. Subdrains are to be placed for all stabilization slopes exceeding 10 feet in height. Lower slopes are subject to review. Drains may be required. Guidelines for subdrains are presented on Plate D-5.

5. Benching of backcuts during fill placement is required.

Lot Capping

1. When practical, the upper three (3) feet of material placed below finish grade should be comprised of the least expansive material available. Preferably, highly and very highly expansive materials should not be used. We will attempt to offer advice based on visual evaluations of the materials during grading, but it must be realized that laboratory testing is needed to evaluate the expansive potential of soil. Minimally, this testing takes two (2) to four (4) days to complete.

2. Transition lots (cut and fill) both per plan and those created by remedial grading (e.g. lots above stabilization fills, along daylight lines, above natural slopes, etc.) should be capped with a minimum three foot thick compacted fill blanket.

3. Cut pads should be observed by our representative(s) to evaluate the need for overexcavation and replacement with fill. This may be necessary to reduce water infiltration into highly fractured bedrock or other permeable zones, and/or due to differing expansive potential of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation should be at least three feet. Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in some cases.

ROCK PLACEMENT AND ROCK FILL GUIDELINES

It is anticipated that large quantities of oversize material would be generated during grading. It’s likely that such materials may require special handling for burial. Although alternatives may be developed in the field, the following methods of rock disposal are recommended on a preliminary basis.

Limited Larger Rock
When materials encountered are principally soil with limited quantities of larger rock fragments or boulders, placement in windrows is recommended. The following procedures should be applied:

1. Oversize rock (greater than 8 inches) should be placed in windrows. a) Windrows are rows of single file rocks placed to avoid nesting or clusters of rock. b) Each adjacent rock should be approximately the same size (within ~one foot in diameter).

Page 293 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-6
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

c) The maximum rock size allowed in windrows is four feet

2. A minimum vertical distance of three feet between lifts should be maintained. Also, the windrows should be offset from lift to lift. Rock windrows should not be closer than 15 feet to the face of fill slopes and sufficient space must be maintained for proper slope construction (see Plate D-4).

3. Rocks greater than eight inches in diameter should not be placed within seven feet of the finished subgrade for a roadway or pads and should be held below the depth of the lowest utility. This will allow easier trenching for utility lines.

4. Rocks greater than four feet in diameter should be broken down, if possible, or they may be placed in a dozer trench. Each trench should be excavated into the compacted fill a minimum of one foot deeper than the largest diameter of rock.
a) The rock should be placed in the trench and granular fill materials (SE>30) should be flooded into the trench to fill voids around the rock.
b) The over size rock trenches should be no closer together than 15 feet from any slope face.
c) Trenches at higher elevation should be staggered and there should be a minimum of four feet of compacted fill between the top of the one trench and the bottom of the next higher trench.
d) It would be necessary to verify 90 percent relative compaction in these pits. A 24 to 72 hour delay to allow for water dissipation should be anticipated prior to additional fill placement.

Structural Rock Fills
If the materials generated for placement in structural fills contains a significant percentage of material more than six (6) inches in one dimension, then placement using conventional soil fill methods with isolated windrows would not be feasible. In such cases the following could be considered:

1. Mixes of large rock or boulders may be placed as rock fill. They should be below the depth of all utilities both on pads and in roadways and below any proposed swimming pools or other excavations. If these fills are placed within seven (7) feet of finished grade, they may affect foundation design.

2. Rock fills are required to be placed in horizontal layers that should not exceed two feet in thickness, or the maximum rock size present, which ever is less. All rocks exceeding two feet should be broken down to a smaller size, windrowed (see above), or disposed of in non-structural fill areas. Localized larger rock up to 3 feet in largest dimension may be placed in rock fill as follows:
a) individual rocks are placed in a given lift so as to be roughly 50% exposed above the typical surface of the fill ,
b) loaded rock trucks or alternate compactors are worked around the rock on all sides to the satisfaction of the soil engineer,
c) the portion of the rock above grade is covered with a second lift.

3. Material placed in each lift should be well graded. No unfilled spaces (voids) should be permitted in the rock fill.

Compaction Procedures
Compaction of rock fills is largely procedural. The following procedures have been found to generally produce satisfactory compaction.

Page 294 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-7
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

1. Provisions for routing of construction traffic over the fill should be implemented. a) Placement should be by rock trucks crossing the lift being placed and dumping at its edge.
b) The trucks should be routed so that each pass across the fill is via a different path and that all areas are uniformly traversed.
c) The dumped piles should be knocked down and spread by a large dozer (D-8 or larger suggested). (Water should be applied before and during spreading.)

2. Rock fill should be generously watered (sluiced)
a) Water should be applied by water trucks to the:
i) dump piles,
ii) front face of the lift being placed and,
iii) surface of the fill prior to compaction.
b) No material should be placed without adequate water. c) The number of water trucks and water supply should be sufficient to provide constant water.
d) Rock fill placement should be suspended when water trucks are unavailable:
i) for more than 5 minutes straight, or,
ii) for more than 10 minutes/hour.

3. In addition to the truck pattern and at the discretion of the soil engineer, large, rubber tired compactors may be required.
a) The need for this equipment will depend largely on the ability of the operators to provide complete and uniform coverage by wheel rolling with the trucks. b) Other large compactors will also be considered by the soil engineer provided that required compaction is achieved.

4. Placement and compaction of the rock fill is largely procedural. Observation by trenching should be made to check:
a) the general segregation of rock size,
b) for any unfilled spaces between the large blocks, and c) the matrix compaction and moisture content.

5. Test fills may be required to evaluate relative compaction of finer grained zones or as deemed appropriate by the soil engineer.
a) A lift should be constructed by the methods proposed, as proposed

6. Frequency of the test trenching is to be at the discretion of the soil engineer. Control areas may be used to evaluate the contractor’s procedures.

7. A minimum horizontal distance of 15 feet should be maintained from the face of the rock fill and any finish slope face. At least the outer 15 feet should be built of conventional fill materials.

Piping Potential and Filter Blankets
Where conventional fill is placed over rock fill, the potential for piping (migration) of the fine grained material from the conventional fill into rock fills will need to be addressed.

The potential for particle migration is related to the grain size comparisons of the materials present and in contact with each other. Provided that 15 percent of the finer soil is larger than the effective pore size of the coarse soil, then particle migration is substantially mitigated. This can be accomplished with a well-graded matrix material for the rock fill and a zone of fill similar to the matrix above it. The specific gradation of the fill materials placed during grading must be known to evaluate the need for any type of

Page 295 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-8
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

filter that may be necessary to cap the rock fills. This, unfortunately, can only be accurately determined during construction.

In the event that poorly graded matrix is used in the rock fills, properly graded filter blankets 2 to 3 feet thick separating rock fills and conventional fill may be needed. As an alternative, use of two layers of filter fabric (Mirafi 700 x or equivalent) could be employed on top of the rock fill. In order to mitigate excess puncturing, the surface of the rock fill should be well broken down and smoothed prior to placing the filter fabric. The first layer of the fabric may then be placed and covered with relatively permeable fill material (with respect to overlying material) 1 to 2 feet thick. The relative permeable material should be compacted to fill standards. The second layer of fabric should be placed and conventional fill placement continued.

Subdrainage
Rock fill areas should be tied to a subdrainage system. If conventional fill is placed that separates the rock from the main canyon subdrain, then a secondary system should be installed. A system consisting of an adequately graded base (3 to 4 percent to the lower side) with a collector system and outlets may suffice.

Additionally, at approximately every 25 foot vertical interval, a collector system with outlets should be placed at the interface of the rock fill and the conventional fill blanketing a fill slope Monitoring
Depending upon the depth of the rock fill and other factors, monitoring for settlement of the fill areas may be needed following completion of grading. Typically, if rock fill depths exceed 40 feet, monitoring would be recommend prior to construction of any settlement sensitive improvements. Delays of 3 to 6 months or longer can be expected prior to the start of construction.

UTILITY TRENCH CONSTRUCTION AND BACKFILL

Utility trench excavation and backfill is the contractor’s responsibility. The geotechnical consultant typically provides periodic observation and testing of these operations. While efforts are made to make sufficient observations and tests to verify that the contractors’ methods and procedures are adequate to achieve proper compaction, it is typically impractical to observe all backfill procedures. As such, it is critical that the contractor use consistent backfill procedures.

Compaction methods vary for trench compaction and experience indicates many methods can be successful. However, procedures that “worked” on previous projects may or may not prove effective on a given site. The contractor(s) should outline the procedures proposed, so that we may discuss them prior to construction. We will offer comments based on our knowledge of site conditions and experience.

1. Utility trench backfill in slopes, structural areas, in streets and beneath flat work or hardscape should be brought to at least optimum moisture and compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Soil should be moisture conditioned prior to placing in the trench.

2. Flooding and jetting are not typically recommended or acceptable for native soils. Flooding or jetting may be used with select sand having a Sand Equivalent (SE) of 30 or higher. This is typically limited to the following uses:
a) shallow (12 + inches) under slab interior trenches and, b) as bedding in pipe zone.

Page 296 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-9
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

The water should be allowed to dissipate prior to pouring slabs or completing trench compaction.

3. Care should be taken not to place soils at high moisture content within the upper three feet of the trench backfill in street areas, as overly wet soils may impact subgrade preparation.

Moisture may be reduced to 2% below optimum moisture in areas to be paved within the upper three feet below sub grade.

4. Sand backfill should not be allowed in exterior trenches adjacent to and within an area extending below a 1:1 projection from the outside bottom edge of a footing, unless it is similar to the surrounding soil.

5. Trench compaction testing is generally at the discretion of the geotechnical consultant. Testing frequency will be based on trench depth and the contractor’s procedures. A probing rod would be used to assess the consistency of compaction between tested areas and untested areas. If zones are found that are considered less compact than other areas, this would be brought to the contractor’s attention.

JOB SAFETY
General
Personnel safety is a primary concern on all job sites. The following summaries are safety considerations for use by all our employees on multi-employer construction sites. On ground personnel are at highest risk of injury and possible fatality on grading construction projects. The company recognizes that construction activities will vary on each site and that job site safety is the contractor's responsibility.

However, it is, imperative that all personnel be safety conscious to avoid accidents and potential injury.

In an effort to minimize risks associated with geotechnical testing and observation, the following precautions are to be implemented for the safety of our field personnel on grading and construction projects.

1. Safety Meetings: Our field personnel are directed to attend the contractor's regularly scheduled safety meetings.

2. Safety Vests: Safety vests are provided for and are to be worn by our personnel while on the job site.

3. Safety Flags: Safety flags are provided to our field technicians; one is to be affixed to the vehicle when on site, the other is to be placed atop the spoil pile on all test pits.

In the event that the contractor's representative observes any of our personnel not following the above, we request that it be brought to the attention of our office.

Test Pits Location, Orientation and Clearance
The technician is responsible for selecting test pit locations. The primary concern is the technician's safety. However, it is necessary to take sufficient tests at various locations to obtain a representative sampling of the fill. As such, efforts will be made to coordinate locations with the grading contractors authorized representatives (e.g. dump man, operator, supervisor, grade checker, etc.), and to select locations following or behind the established traffic pattern, preferably outside of current traffic. The contractors authorized representative should direct excavation of the pit and safety during the test period. Again, safety is the paramount concern.

Test pits should be excavated so that the spoil pile is placed away from oncoming traffic. The technician's vehicle is to be placed next to the test pit, opposite the spoil pile. This necessitates that the

Page 297 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-10
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

fill be maintained in a drivable condition. Alternatively, the contractor may opt to park a piece of equipment in front of test pits, particularly in small fill areas or those with limited access.

A zone of non-encroachment should be established for all test pits (see diagram below). No grading equipment should enter this zone during the test procedure. The zone should extend outward to the sides approximately 50 feet from the center of the test pit and 100 feet in the direction of traffic flow.

This zone is established both for safety and to avoid excessive ground vibration, which typically decreases test results.

50 ft Zone of
Non-Encroachment
50 ft Zone of
Non-Encroachment
Traffic Direction
Vehicle
parked here Test Pit Spoil
pile
Spoil
pile
Test Pit

SIDE VIEW

PLAN VIEW

TEST PIT SAFETY PLAN
10 0 ft Zone of
Non-Encroachment

Slope Tests
When taking slope tests, the technician should park their vehicle directly above or below the test location on the slope. The contractor's representative should effectively keep all equipment at a safe operation distance (e.g. 50 feet) away from the slope during testing.

The technician is directed to withdraw from the active portion of the fill as soon as possible following testing. The technician's vehicle should be parked at the perimeter of the fill in a highly visible location.

Trench Safety
It is the contractor's responsibility to provide safe access into trenches where compaction testing is needed. Trenches for all utilities should be excavated in accordance with CAL-OSHA and any other applicable safety standards. Safe conditions will be required to enable compaction testing of the trench backfill.

All utility trench excavations in excess of 5 feet deep, which a person enters, are to be shored or laid back. Trench access should be provided in accordance with OSHA standards. Our personnel are directed not to enter any trench by being lowered or "riding down" on the equipment.

Our personnel are directed not to enter any excavation which;

1. is 5 feet or deeper unless shored or laid back,

2. exit points or ladders are not provided,

Page 298 of 475 ends

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX D
Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Page D-11
City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, California Project No. 4049-CR

3. displays any evidence of instability, has any loose rock or other debris which could fall into the trench, or

4. displays any other evidence of any unsafe conditions regardless of depth.

If the contractor fails to provide safe access to trenches for compaction testing, our company policy requires that the soil technician withdraws and notifies their supervisor. The contractor’s representative will then be contacted in an effort to affect a solution. All backfill not tested due to safety concerns or other reasons is subject to reprocessing and/or removal.

Procedures
In the event that the technician's safety is jeopardized or compromised as a result of the contractor's failure to comply with any of the above, the technician is directed to inform both the developer's and contractor's representatives. If the condition is not rectified, the technician is required, by company policy, to immediately withdraw and notify their supervisor. The contractor’s representative will then be contacted in an effort to affect a solution. No further testing will be performed until the situation is rectified. Any fill placed in the interim can be considered unacceptable and subject to reprocessing, recompaction or removal.

In the event that the soil technician does not comply with the above or other established safety guidelines, we request that the contractor bring this to technician’s attention and notify our project manager or office. Effective communication and coordination between the contractors' representative and the field technician(s) is strongly encouraged in order to implement the above safety program and safety in general.

The safety procedures outlined above should be discussed at the contractor's safety meetings. This will serve to inform and remind equipment operators of these safety procedures particularly the zone of non-encroachment.

Page 299 of 475 ends

ALTERNATES
Original Ground
3’
Loose Surface Materials
Finish Grade
3’
Suitable
Material
Suitable
Material
6” Perforated Pipe in 9 cubic feet per Lineal
Foot Clean Gravel Wrapped in Filter Fabric
Construct Benches
where slope exceeds 5:1
Bottom of Cleanout to Be At
Least 1.5 Times the Width of
Compaction Equipment
4 feet typical
Slope to Drain
Original Ground
Loose Surface Materials
Finish Grade
Suitable
MaterialConstruct Benches
where slope exceeds 5:1
Bottom of Cleanout to Be At
Least 1.5 Times the Width of
Compaction Equipment
4 feet typical
Slope to Drain
6” Perforated Pipe in 9 cubic feet
per Lineal Foot Clean Gravel
Wrapped in Filter Fabric
1548 North Maple Street
Corona, California 92878

TYPICAL CANYON

CLEANOUT

STANDARD GRADING

GUIDELINES
PLATE D-1

Page 300 of 475 ends

TYPICAL FILL SLOPE OVER

NATURAL DESCENDING SLOPE
Topsoil
Bedrock
Finish Grade
Fill Slope
Daylight Cut
Line per Plan
Project Removal
at 1 to 1
Min. 3 Feet
Compacted Fill
Colluvium
Creep Zone
Minimum 15 Feet Wide
or 1.5 Equipment
Widths for Compaction
Toe of Fill Slope
per Plan

DAYLIGHT CUT AREA OVER

NATURAL DESCENDING SLOPE
Topsoil
Structural Setback
Without Corrective Work
Project Removal
at 1 to 1
Colluvium
Creep Zone
Min.
2 Feet
Minimum 15 Feet Wide
or 1.5 Equipment
Widths for Compaction
Finish Grade
Bedrock
Min. 3 Feet
Compacted Fill
Mi n. 2 % Fal l
Min.
2 FeetMin. 2 % F al l
Compacted Fill
Compacted Fill

Topsoil
Colluvium
Creep Zone

TREATMENT ABOVE

NATURAL SLOPES

STANDARD GRADING

GUIDELINES
PLATE D-2
1548 North Maple Street
Corona, California 92878

Page 301 of 475 ends

TYPICAL FILL SLOPE OVER

CUT SLOPE
Topsoil
Bedrock
Finish Grade
2: 1 Fill Slope
4’ Typical
Colluvium
Creep Zone
Minimum 15 Feet Wide
or 1.5 Equipment
Widths for Compaction
Toe of Fill Slope
per Plan

TYPICAL FILL SLOPE
Bedrock or
Suitable Dense Material
Minimum compacted fill required
to provide lateral support.

Excavate key if width or depth
less than indicated in table above
Cut Slope
Min. 2 % Fall
SLOPE
HEIGHT
MIN. KEY
WIDTH
MIN. KEY
DEPTH
5 10
15 20
25 >25
7 10
15 15
15 SEE TEXT
1 1.5
2 2.5
3 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY

WITH SOIL ENGINEER

PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION

COMMON FILL

SLOPE KEYS

STANDARD GRADING

GUIDELINES
PLATE D-3
1548 North Maple Street
Corona, California 92878

Page 302 of 475 ends

NOTES:
2) MAXIMUM ROCK SIZE IN WINDROWS IS 4 FEET
3) SOIL AROUND WINDROWS TO BE SANDY MATERIAL SUBJECT TO SOIL ENGINEER ACCEPTANCE 4) SPACING AND CLEARANCES MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FOR PROPER COMPACTION 5) INDIVDUAL LARGE ROCKS MAY BE BURIED IN PITS.

SEE NOTE 1
15’
MIN.3’ MIN.
3’ MIN.

MINIMUM 15’ CLEAR OR

1.5 EQUIPMENT WIDTHS

FOR COMPACTION

STAGGER ROWS

HORIZONTALLY

NO ROCKS IN

THIS ZONE

CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW

FINISH GRADE

FILL SLOPE

PLAN VIEW

FILL SLOPE
MINIMUM 15’ CLEAR OR 1.5 EQUIPMENT

WIDTHS FOR COMPACTION
MINIMUM 15’ CLEAR OR 1.5 EQUIPMENT

WIDTHS FOR COMPACTION

PLACE ROCKS END TO END

DO NOT PILE OR STACK ROCKS

SOIL TO BE PLACE AROUND AND OVER ROCKS THEN FLOODED INTO VOIDS. MUST COMPACT AROUND AND OVER EACH ROCK WINDROW
1) SOIL FILL OVER WINDROW SHOULD BE 7 FEET OR PER JURISDUICTIONAL STANDARDS AND SUFFICIENT FOR FUTURE EXCAVATIONS TO AVOID ROCKS

ROCK BURIAL DETAILS STANDARD GRADING

GUIDELINES
PLATE D-4
1548 North Maple Street
Corona, California 92878

IN DIAMETER

Page 303 of 475 ends

SEE DETAILS FOR BACKDRAIN

AND HEEL DRAIN

BACKDRAIN

DETAILS

HEEL DRAIN

DETAILS
6” diameter perforated drain pipe in 6 cubic
feet per lineal foot clean gravel wrapped
in filter fabric, outlet pipe to gravity flow
with 2% minimum fall
4” diameter perforated drain pipe
(Schedule 40 PVC or equivalent) in
6 cubic feet per lineal foot clean gravel
wrapped in filter fabric
4” diameter solid outlet pipe (Schedule 40
PVC or equivalent) laterals to slope face or
storm drain system at maximum 100 foot
maximum intervals
Note: Additional backdrains may be recommended
2% Minimum Fall
710 E. Parkridge Ave, Suite 105Corona, CA 92879710 E. Parkridge Ave, Suite 105Corona, CA 92879

TYPICAL BUTTRESS AND

STABILIZATION FILL

STANDARD GRADING

GUIDELINES
PLATE D-5
1548 North Maple Street
Corona, California 92878

Page 304 of 475 ends

Appendix B: Noise Data

Page 305 of 475 ends

Site Number: NM-1
Recorded By: Dennis Dinh, Darshan Shivaiah
Job Number: 206498
Date: 4/02/2025
Time: 11:03 a.m.

Location: At the southwest corner of East C Street and North 1st Avenue Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along East C Street and North 1st Avenue Noise Data
Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB)

55.5 42.4 75.2

Equipment
Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note

Sound

Sound Level Meter Brüel & Kjær 2250 3011133 06/04/2023
Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 3086765 06/04/2023
Preamp Brüel & Kjær ZC 0032 25380 06/04/2023
Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2545667 06/04/2023
Weather Data

Est.

Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Sunny
Note: dBA Offset = -0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft
Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (inches) 3 56 29.96

Photo of Measurement Location

Page 306 of 475 ends

2250
Instrument:2250
Application:BZ7225 Version 4.7.6
Start Time:04/02/2025 11:03:13
End Time:04/02/2025 11:13:13
Elapsed Time:00:10:00
Bandwidth:1/3-octave
Max Input Level:142.15
Time Frequency
Broadband (excl. Peak):FSI AC
Broadband Peak:C
Spectrum:FS Z
Instrument Serial Number: 3011133
Microphone Serial Number: 3086765
Input:Top Socket
Windscreen Correction:UA-1650
Sound Field Correction:Free-field
Calibration Time: 04/02/2025 11:02:21
Calibration Type: External reference
Sensitivity:43.4710383415222 mV/Pa
UPLND_001
Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 55.5 75.2 42.4
Time 11:03:13 AM 11:13:13 AM 0:10:00
Date 04/02/2025 04/02/2025

Page 307 of 475 ends

Cursor: (A) Leq=55.5 dB LFmax=75.2 dB LFmin=42.4 dB
UPLND_001

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
120
130
dB 04/02/2025 11:03:13 AM - 11:13:13 AM
Hz
LZeq LZFmax LZFmin
Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% UPLND_001
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
%Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 04/02/2025 11:03:13 AM - 11:13:13 AM dB
L1 = 64.9 dB
L5 = 60.2 dB
L10 = 58.8 dB
L50 = 52.2 dB
L90 = 46.5 dB
L95 = 45.2 dB
L99 = 43.7 dB
Level Cumulative

Page 308 of 475 ends

Cursor: 04/02/2025 11:08:12 AM - 11:08:13 AM LAIeq=52.2 dB LAFmax=52.1 dB LCpeak=75.0 dB LAFmin=49.5 dB UPLND_001
11:04:00 AM 11:06:00 AM 11:08:00 AM 11:10:00 AM 11:12:00 AM 20 40
60 80
100
120
140
dB
LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin
UPLND_001
Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 52.2 52.1 49.5
Time 11:08:12 AM 0:00:01
Date 04/02/2025

Page 309 of 475 ends

Cursor: (A) Leq=50.2 dB
UPLND_001

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
dB 04/02/2025 11:08:12 AM - 11:08:13 AM
Hz
LZeq
Cursor: 04/02/2025 11:03:13 AM - 12:03:13 PM LAIeq=58.1 dB LAFmax=75.2 dB LCpeak=92.6 dB LAFmin=42.4 dB UPLND_001 Periodic reports
11:10:00 AM 11:20:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 20 40
60 80
100
120
140
dB
LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin

Page 310 of 475 ends

UPLND_001 Periodic reports
Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 58.1 75.2 42.4
Time 11:03:13 AM 0:10:00
Date 04/02/2025
Cursor: (A) Leq=55.5 dB LFmax=75.2 dB LFmin=42.4 dB
UPLND_001 Periodic reports

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
dB 04/02/2025 11:03:13 AM - 11:13:13 AM
Hz
LZeq LZFmax LZFmin

Page 311 of 475 ends

Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% UPLND_001 Periodic reports
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
%Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 04/02/2025 11:03:13 AM - 11:13:13 AM dB
L1 = 64.9 dB
L5 = 60.2 dB
L10 = 58.8 dB
L50 = 52.2 dB
L90 = 46.5 dB
L95 = 45.2 dB
L99 = 43.7 dB
Level Cumulative

Page 312 of 475 ends

Site Number: NM-2
Recorded By: Dennis Dinh, Darshan Shivaiah
Job Number: 206498
Date: 4/02/2025
Time: 11:15 a.m.

Location: In front of 231 N 1st Ave, Upland, CA 91786
Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along East C Street and North 1st Avenue Noise Data
Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB)

54.6 41.9 69.7

Equipment
Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note

Sound

Est.

Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Sunny
Note: dBA Offset = -0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft
Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (inches) 3 56 29.96

Photo of Measurement Location

Page 313 of 475 ends

2250
Instrument:2250
Application:BZ7225 Version 4.7.6
Start Time:04/02/2025 11:15:14
End Time:04/02/2025 11:25:14
Elapsed Time:00:10:00
Bandwidth:1/3-octave
Max Input Level:142.15
Time Frequency
Broadband (excl. Peak):FSI AC
Broadband Peak:C
Spectrum:FS Z
Instrument Serial Number: 3011133
Microphone Serial Number: 3086765
Input:Top Socket
Windscreen Correction:UA-1650
Sound Field Correction:Free-field
Calibration Time: 04/02/2025 11:02:21
Calibration Type: External reference
Sensitivity:43.4710383415222 mV/Pa
UPLND_002
Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 54.6 69.7 41.9
Time 11:15:14 AM 11:25:14 AM 0:10:00
Date 04/02/2025 04/02/2025

Page 314 of 475 ends

Cursor: 160 Hz LZeq=52.3 dB LZFmax=75.2 dB LZFmin=35.1 dB UPLND_002

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
120
130
dB 04/02/2025 11:15:14 AM - 11:25:14 AM
Hz
LZeq LZFmax LZFmin
Cursor: [67.0 ; 68.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.4% UPLND_002
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
%Based on LZF 160Hz, 100ms Class width: 1.0 dB 04/02/2025 11:15:14 AM - 11:25:14 AM dB
L1 = 61.8 dB
L5 = 56.9 dB
L10 = 53.9 dB
L50 = 46.6 dB
L90 = 41.9 dB
L95 = 40.6 dB
L99 = 38.9 dB
Level Cumulative

Page 315 of 475 ends

Cursor: 04/02/2025 11:20:13 AM - 11:20:14 AM LAIeq=47.2 dB LAFmax=47.7 dB LCpeak=72.2 dB LAFmin=45.4 dB UPLND_002
11:16:00 AM 11:18:00 AM 11:20:00 AM 11:22:00 AM 11:24:00 AM 20 40
60 80
100
120
140
dB
LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin
UPLND_002
Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 47.2 47.7 45.4
Time 11:20:13 AM 0:00:01
Date 04/02/2025

Page 316 of 475 ends

Cursor: (A) Leq=45.9 dB
UPLND_002

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
dB 04/02/2025 11:20:13 AM - 11:20:14 AM
Hz
LZeq
Cursor: 04/02/2025 11:15:14 AM - 12:15:14 PM LAIeq=56.8 dB LAFmax=69.7 dB LCpeak=86.9 dB LAFmin=41.9 dB UPLND_002 Periodic reports
11:20:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 12:10:00 PM 20 40
60 80
100
120
140
dB
LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin

Page 317 of 475 ends

UPLND_002 Periodic reports
Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 56.8 69.7 41.9
Time 11:15:14 AM 0:10:00
Date 04/02/2025
Cursor: (A) Leq=54.6 dB LFmax=69.7 dB LFmin=41.9 dB
UPLND_002 Periodic reports

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
dB 04/02/2025 11:15:14 AM - 11:25:14 AM
Hz
LZeq LZFmax LZFmin

Page 318 of 475 ends

Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% UPLND_002 Periodic reports
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
%Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 04/02/2025 11:15:14 AM - 11:25:14 AM dB
L1 = 65.6 dB
L5 = 60.1 dB
L10 = 57.7 dB
L50 = 50.8 dB
L90 = 45.5 dB
L95 = 44.4 dB
L99 = 43.0 dB
Level Cumulative

Page 319 of 475 ends

Site Number: NM-3
Recorded By: Dennis Dinh, Darshan Shivaiah
Job Number: 206498
Date: 4/02/2025
Time: 11:28 a.m.

Location: At the northeast corner of East C Street and the alley way Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along East C Street and North 1st Avenue Noise Data
Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB)

53.2 44.5 70.2

Equipment
Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note

Sound

Est.

Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Sunny
Note: dBA Offset = -0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft
Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (inches) 3 56 29.96

Photo of Measurement Location

Page 320 of 475 ends

2250
Instrument:2250
Application:BZ7225 Version 4.7.6
Start Time:04/02/2025 11:28:53
End Time:04/02/2025 11:38:53
Elapsed Time:00:10:00
Bandwidth:1/3-octave
Max Input Level:142.15
Time Frequency
Broadband (excl. Peak):FSI AC
Broadband Peak:C
Spectrum:FS Z
Instrument Serial Number: 3011133
Microphone Serial Number: 3086765
Input:Top Socket
Windscreen Correction:UA-1650
Sound Field Correction:Free-field
Calibration Time: 04/02/2025 11:02:21
Calibration Type: External reference
Sensitivity:43.4710383415222 mV/Pa
UPLND_003
Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 53.2 70.2 44.5
Time 11:28:53 AM 11:38:53 AM 0:10:00
Date 04/02/2025 04/02/2025

Page 321 of 475 ends

Cursor: (A) Leq=53.2 dB LFmax=70.2 dB LFmin=44.5 dB
UPLND_003

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
120
130
dB 04/02/2025 11:28:53 AM - 11:38:53 AM
Hz
LZeq LZFmax LZFmin
Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% UPLND_003
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
%Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 04/02/2025 11:28:53 AM - 11:38:53 AM dB
L1 = 65.0 dB
L5 = 59.3 dB
L10 = 55.1 dB
L50 = 48.8 dB
L90 = 46.5 dB
L95 = 46.0 dB
L99 = 45.3 dB
Level Cumulative

Page 322 of 475 ends

Cursor: 04/02/2025 11:33:52 AM - 11:33:53 AM LAIeq=49.0 dB LAFmax=49.0 dB LCpeak=74.9 dB LAFmin=47.5 dB UPLND_003
11:29:00 AM 11:31:00 AM 11:33:00 AM 11:35:00 AM 11:37:00 AM 20 40
60 80
100
120
140
dB
LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin
UPLND_003
Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 49.0 49.0 47.5
Time 11:33:52 AM 0:00:01
Date 04/02/2025

Page 323 of 475 ends

Cursor: (A) Leq=48.3 dB
UPLND_003

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
dB 04/02/2025 11:33:52 AM - 11:33:53 AM
Hz
LZeq
Cursor: 04/02/2025 11:28:53 AM - 12:28:53 PM LAIeq=56.6 dB LAFmax=70.2 dB LCpeak=92.2 dB LAFmin=44.5 dB UPLND_003 Periodic reports
11:30:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 12:10:00 PM 12:20:00 PM 20 40
60 80
100
120
140
dB
LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin

Page 324 of 475 ends

UPLND_003 Periodic reports
Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin
time time [%][dB][dB][dB]
Value 0.00 56.6 70.2 44.5
Time 11:28:53 AM 0:10:00
Date 04/02/2025
Cursor: (A) Leq=53.2 dB LFmax=70.2 dB LFmin=44.5 dB
UPLND_003 Periodic reports

12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
dB 04/02/2025 11:28:53 AM - 11:38:53 AM
Hz
LZeq LZFmax LZFmin

Page 325 of 475 ends

Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% UPLND_003 Periodic reports
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
%Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 04/02/2025 11:28:53 AM - 11:38:53 AM dB
L1 = 65.0 dB
L5 = 59.3 dB
L10 = 55.1 dB
L50 = 48.8 dB
L90 = 46.5 dB
L95 = 46.0 dB
L99 = 45.3 dB
Level Cumulative

Page 326 of 475 ends

Appendix C: Air
Quality Data

Page 327 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 1 / 81
Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated

3.2. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated

3.3. Grading (2027) - Unmitigated

Page 328 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 2 / 81

3.4. Grading (2027) - Mitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.6. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2028) - Mitigated

3.9. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated

3.10. Paving (2028) - Mitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated

3.12. Architectural Coating (2028) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

Page 329 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 3 / 81

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

Page 330 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 4 / 81

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

Page 331 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 5 / 81

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

Page 332 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 6 / 81

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

Page 333 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 7 / 81

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

Page 334 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 8 / 81

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data

Page 335 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 9 / 81

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Upland Downtown Parking Structure
Construction Start Date 1/1/2027
Operational Year 2028
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s)2.80
Precipitation (days)2.20
Location 243 N 1st Ave, Upland, CA 91786, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Upland
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5231
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.29

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Strip Mall 4.95 1000sqft 0.11 4,950 1,000 ———

Page 336 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 10 / 81
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru

4.95 1000sqft 0.11 4,950 1,000 ———
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
407 Space 0.61 162,800 1,000 ———

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector #Measure Title
Construction C-10-A Water Exposed Surfaces
Construction C-10-B Water Active Demolition Sites
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.4.97 4.95 5.69 12.2 0.02 0.18 1.18 1.36 0.17 0.29 0.45 —3,121 3,121 0.12 0.17 5.08 3,180 Mit.4.97 4.95 5.69 12.2 0.02 0.18 1.18 1.36 0.17 0.29 0.45 —3,121 3,121 0.12 0.17 5.08 3,180 %
Reduced
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.22 1.02 8.81 11.0 0.02 0.39 5.43 5.82 0.36 2.60 2.96 —3,041 3,041 0.17 0.23 0.13 3,095 Mit.1.22 1.02 8.81 11.0 0.02 0.39 1.60 1.89 0.36 0.70 1.06 —3,041 3,041 0.17 0.23 0.13 3,095

Page 337 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 11 / 81
%
Reduced
——————71%68%—73%64%———————
Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.68 0.55 4.28 7.65 0.01 0.14 1.13 1.27 0.13 0.34 0.46 —2,063 2,063 0.09 0.12 1.40 2,101 Mit.0.68 0.55 4.28 7.65 0.01 0.14 0.88 1.02 0.13 0.23 0.35 —2,063 2,063 0.09 0.12 1.40 2,101 %
Reduced
——————22%20%—33%24%———————
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.12 0.10 0.78 1.40 < 0.005 0.03 0.21 0.23 0.02 0.06 0.08 —342 342 0.01 0.02 0.23 348 Mit.0.12 0.10 0.78 1.40 < 0.005 0.03 0.16 0.19 0.02 0.04 0.06 —342 342 0.01 0.02 0.23 348 %
Reduced
——————22%20%—33%24%———————

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
2027 0.98 0.79 5.69 12.2 0.02 0.18 1.18 1.36 0.17 0.29 0.45 —3,121 3,121 0.12 0.17 5.08 3,180 2028 4.97 4.95 5.40 11.8 0.02 0.16 1.18 1.35 0.14 0.29 0.43 —3,084 3,084 0.12 0.17 4.54 3,142 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
2027 1.22 1.02 8.81 11.0 0.02 0.39 5.43 5.82 0.36 2.60 2.96 —3,041 3,041 0.17 0.23 0.13 3,095 2028 0.90 0.74 5.44 10.7 0.02 0.16 1.18 1.35 0.14 0.29 0.43 —3,005 3,005 0.12 0.17 0.12 3,059 Average
Daily
——————————————————
2027 0.68 0.55 4.28 7.65 0.01 0.14 1.13 1.27 0.13 0.34 0.46 —2,063 2,063 0.09 0.12 1.40 2,101

Page 338 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 12 / 81
2028 0.56 0.51 1.61 3.09 0.01 0.05 0.31 0.35 0.04 0.07 0.12 —799 799 0.03 0.04 0.50 812 Annual ——————————————————
2027 0.12 0.10 0.78 1.40 < 0.005 0.03 0.21 0.23 0.02 0.06 0.08 —342 342 0.01 0.02 0.23 348 2028 0.10 0.09 0.29 0.56 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.02 —132 132 0.01 0.01 0.08 135

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
2027 0.98 0.79 5.69 12.2 0.02 0.18 1.18 1.36 0.17 0.29 0.45 —3,121 3,121 0.12 0.17 5.08 3,180 2028 4.97 4.95 5.40 11.8 0.02 0.16 1.18 1.35 0.14 0.29 0.43 —3,084 3,084 0.12 0.17 4.54 3,142 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
2027 1.22 1.02 8.81 11.0 0.02 0.39 1.60 1.89 0.36 0.70 1.06 —3,041 3,041 0.17 0.23 0.13 3,095 2028 0.90 0.74 5.44 10.7 0.02 0.16 1.18 1.35 0.14 0.29 0.43 —3,005 3,005 0.12 0.17 0.12 3,059 Average
Daily
——————————————————
2027 0.68 0.55 4.28 7.65 0.01 0.14 0.88 1.02 0.13 0.23 0.35 —2,063 2,063 0.09 0.12 1.40 2,101 2028 0.56 0.51 1.61 3.09 0.01 0.05 0.31 0.35 0.04 0.07 0.12 —799 799 0.03 0.04 0.50 812 Annual ——————————————————
2027 0.12 0.10 0.78 1.40 < 0.005 0.03 0.16 0.19 0.02 0.04 0.06 —342 342 0.01 0.02 0.23 348 2028 0.10 0.09 0.29 0.56 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.02 —132 132 0.01 0.01 0.08 135

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

Page 339 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 13 / 81
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.3.76 3.43 2.08 26.1 0.05 0.06 4.46 4.52 0.05 1.13 1.18 37.1 6,055 6,092 4.02 0.24 21.9 6,286 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.2.30 2.07 2.15 15.5 0.05 0.04 4.46 4.50 0.04 1.13 1.17 37.1 5,710 5,747 4.03 0.25 8.14 5,930 Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.3.20 2.90 2.23 21.2 0.05 0.05 4.45 4.51 0.05 1.13 1.18 37.1 5,780 5,817 4.03 0.25 13.9 6,006 Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.58 0.53 0.41 3.87 0.01 0.01 0.81 0.82 0.01 0.21 0.22 6.14 957 963 0.67 0.04 2.30 994

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 2.16 1.94 1.85 18.5 0.05 0.03 4.46 4.49 0.03 1.13 1.16 —5,041 5,041 0.21 0.22 14.2 5,126 Area 1.58 1.48 0.06 7.51 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.0 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —971 971 0.09 0.01 —976 Water ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Waste ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Refrig.————————————————7.77 7.77
Total 3.76 3.43 2.08 26.1 0.05 0.06 4.46 4.52 0.05 1.13 1.18 37.1 6,055 6,092 4.02 0.24 21.9 6,286 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 340 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 14 / 81
Mobile 2.04 1.82 1.99 15.3 0.05 0.03 4.46 4.49 0.03 1.13 1.16 —4,727 4,727 0.22 0.23 0.37 4,801 Area 0.24 0.24 ————————————————
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —971 971 0.09 0.01 —976 Water ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Waste ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Refrig.————————————————7.77 7.77
Total 2.30 2.07 2.15 15.5 0.05 0.04 4.46 4.50 0.04 1.13 1.17 37.1 5,710 5,747 4.03 0.25 8.14 5,930 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Mobile 2.02 1.80 2.02 15.9 0.05 0.03 4.45 4.49 0.03 1.13 1.16 —4,776 4,776 0.22 0.23 6.12 4,856 Area 1.16 1.09 0.04 5.14 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —21.2 21.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 —21.2 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —971 971 0.09 0.01 —976 Water ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Waste ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Refrig.————————————————7.77 7.77
Total 3.20 2.90 2.23 21.2 0.05 0.05 4.45 4.51 0.05 1.13 1.18 37.1 5,780 5,817 4.03 0.25 13.9 6,006 Annual ——————————————————
Mobile 0.37 0.33 0.37 2.91 0.01 0.01 0.81 0.82 0.01 0.21 0.21 —791 791 0.04 0.04 1.01 804 Area 0.21 0.20 0.01 0.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —3.50 3.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.52 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —161 161 0.02 < 0.005 —162 Water ———————————0.59 2.04 2.63 0.06 < 0.005 —4.59
Waste ———————————5.55 0.00 5.55 0.55 0.00 —19.4
Refrig.————————————————1.29 1.29
Total 0.58 0.53 0.41 3.87 0.01 0.01 0.81 0.82 0.01 0.21 0.22 6.14 957 963 0.67 0.04 2.30 994

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

Page 341 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 15 / 81
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 2.16 1.94 1.85 18.5 0.05 0.03 4.46 4.49 0.03 1.13 1.16 —5,041 5,041 0.21 0.22 14.2 5,126 Area 1.58 1.48 0.06 7.51 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.0 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —971 971 0.09 0.01 —976 Water ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Waste ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Refrig.————————————————7.77 7.77
Total 3.76 3.43 2.08 26.1 0.05 0.06 4.46 4.52 0.05 1.13 1.18 37.1 6,055 6,092 4.02 0.24 21.9 6,286 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 2.04 1.82 1.99 15.3 0.05 0.03 4.46 4.49 0.03 1.13 1.16 —4,727 4,727 0.22 0.23 0.37 4,801 Area 0.24 0.24 ————————————————
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —971 971 0.09 0.01 —976 Water ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Waste ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Refrig.————————————————7.77 7.77
Total 2.30 2.07 2.15 15.5 0.05 0.04 4.46 4.50 0.04 1.13 1.17 37.1 5,710 5,747 4.03 0.25 8.14 5,930 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Mobile 2.02 1.80 2.02 15.9 0.05 0.03 4.45 4.49 0.03 1.13 1.16 —4,776 4,776 0.22 0.23 6.12 4,856 Area 1.16 1.09 0.04 5.14 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —21.2 21.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 —21.2 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —971 971 0.09 0.01 —976 Water ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Waste ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Refrig.————————————————7.77 7.77
Total 3.20 2.90 2.23 21.2 0.05 0.05 4.45 4.51 0.05 1.13 1.18 37.1 5,780 5,817 4.03 0.25 13.9 6,006 Annual ——————————————————

Page 342 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 16 / 81
Mobile 0.37 0.33 0.37 2.91 0.01 0.01 0.81 0.82 0.01 0.21 0.21 —791 791 0.04 0.04 1.01 804 Area 0.21 0.20 0.01 0.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —3.50 3.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.52 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —161 161 0.02 < 0.005 —162 Water ———————————0.59 2.04 2.63 0.06 < 0.005 —4.59
Waste ———————————5.55 0.00 5.55 0.55 0.00 —19.4
Refrig.————————————————1.29 1.29
Total 0.58 0.53 0.41 3.87 0.01 0.01 0.81 0.82 0.01 0.21 0.22 6.14 957 963 0.67 0.04 2.30 994

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.51 0.42 3.94 5.55 0.01 0.12 —0.12 0.11 —0.11 —852 852 0.03 0.01 —855 Demoliti
on
——————1.72 1.72 —0.26 0.26 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————

Page 343 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 17 / 81

49.2—< 0.005< 0.00549.049.0—0.01—0.010.01—0.01< 0.0050.320.230.020.03Off-Roa d
Equipm
Demoliti
on
——————0.10 0.10 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —8.11 8.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 —8.14 Demoliti
on
——————0.02 0.02 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 —124 124 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 126 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.15 0.02 1.59 0.87 0.01 0.02 0.37 0.38 0.02 0.10 0.12 —1,312 1,312 0.13 0.21 0.06 1,379 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —7.24 7.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.33 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.09 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —75.4 75.4 0.01 0.01 0.06 79.4 Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.20 1.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.21 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Page 344 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 18 / 81
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —12.5 12.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 13.1

3.2. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.51 0.42 3.94 5.55 0.01 0.12 —0.12 0.11 —0.11 —852 852 0.03 0.01 —855 Demoliti
on
——————1.10 1.10 —0.17 0.17 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.02 0.23 0.32 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —49.0 49.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —49.2 Demoliti
on
——————0.06 0.06 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —8.11 8.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 —8.14

Page 345 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 19 / 81
Demoliti ——————0.01 0.01 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ———————
Onsite
truck

3.3. Grading (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 346 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 20 / 81
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.18 0.99 8.70 9.56 0.02 0.39 —0.39 0.36 —0.36 —1,715 1,715 0.07 0.01 —1,720 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————5.31 5.31 —2.57 2.57 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.06 0.05 0.48 0.52 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.02 —0.02 —93.9 93.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 —94.3 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.29 0.29 —0.14 0.14 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —15.6 15.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —15.6 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.05 0.05 —0.03 0.03 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————

Page 347 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 21 / 81
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 —93.0 93.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 94.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 —63.2 63.2 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 66.4 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.17 5.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.24 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.46 3.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.64 Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.87 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60

3.4. Grading (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 348 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 22 / 81
1,720—0.010.071,7151,715—0.36—0.360.39—0.390.029.568.700.991.18Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————1.38 1.38 —0.67 0.67 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.06 0.05 0.48 0.52 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.02 —0.02 —93.9 93.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 —94.3 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.08 0.08 —0.04 0.04 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —15.6 15.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —15.6 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.01 0.01 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 349 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 23 / 81
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 —93.0 93.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 94.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 —63.2 63.2 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 66.4 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.17 5.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.24 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.46 3.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.64 Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.87 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60

3.5. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.57 0.48 4.56 6.90 0.01 0.17 —0.17 0.15 —0.15 —1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 —1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 350 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 24 / 81
Off-Roa
Equipment

0.57 0.48 4.56 6.90 0.01 0.17 —0.17 0.15 —0.15 —1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 —1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.34 0.29 2.73 4.13 0.01 0.10 —0.10 0.09 —0.09 —781 781 0.03 0.01 —784 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.06 0.05 0.50 0.75 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.02 —0.02 —129 129 0.01 < 0.005 —130 Onsite
truck

Page 351 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 25 / 81
Worker 0.19 0.17 0.19 2.28 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.13 0.13 —543 543 0.01 0.02 0.79 550 Vendor 0.05 0.01 0.56 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.05 —505 505 0.04 0.08 0.52 529 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 —89.9 89.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 91.0 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —83.6 83.6 0.01 0.01 0.09 87.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.57 0.48 4.56 6.90 0.01 0.17 —0.17 0.15 —0.15 —1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 —1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.57 0.48 4.56 6.90 0.01 0.17 —0.17 0.15 —0.15 —1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 —1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————

Page 352 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 26 / 81
784—0.010.03781781—0.09—0.090.10—0.100.014.132.730.290.34Off-Roa d
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.06 0.05 0.50 0.75 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.02 —0.02 —129 129 0.01 < 0.005 —130 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.33 0.30 0.25 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.22 0.22 —974 974 0.01 0.03 3.06 988 Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.89 0.48 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.25 0.01 0.07 0.08 —843 843 0.06 0.13 2.02 884 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.31 0.28 0.28 3.64 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.22 0.22 —894 894 0.01 0.03 0.08 904 Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.93 0.49 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.25 0.01 0.07 0.08 —843 843 0.06 0.13 0.05 882 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.19 0.17 0.19 2.28 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.13 0.13 —543 543 0.01 0.02 0.79 550 Vendor 0.05 0.01 0.56 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.05 —505 505 0.04 0.08 0.52 529 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 —89.9 89.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 91.0 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —83.6 83.6 0.01 0.01 0.09 87.5

Page 353 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 27 / 81
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.55 0.46 4.30 6.91 0.01 0.15 —0.15 0.14 —0.14 —1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 —1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.55 0.46 4.30 6.91 0.01 0.15 —0.15 0.14 —0.14 —1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 —1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.13 0.11 1.02 1.64 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.03 —0.03 —309 309 0.01 < 0.005 —310 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————

Page 354 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 28 / 81

51.3—< 0.005< 0.00551.151.1—0.01—0.010.01—0.01< 0.0050.300.190.020.02Off-Roa d
Equipm
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.29 0.28 0.25 4.47 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.22 0.22 —956 956 0.01 0.03 2.75 969 Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.85 0.47 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.25 0.01 0.07 0.07 —823 823 0.05 0.13 1.79 864 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.27 0.27 0.25 3.36 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.22 0.22 —877 877 0.01 0.03 0.07 887 Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.89 0.47 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.25 0.01 0.07 0.07 —824 824 0.05 0.13 0.05 863 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.05 0.05 —211 211 < 0.005 0.01 0.28 213 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 —195 195 0.01 0.03 0.18 204 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 —34.9 34.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 35.3 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —32.3 32.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 33.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2028) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2ePage 355 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 29 / 81
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.55 0.46 4.30 6.91 0.01 0.15 —0.15 0.14 —0.14 —1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 —1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.55 0.46 4.30 6.91 0.01 0.15 —0.15 0.14 —0.14 —1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 —1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.13 0.11 1.02 1.64 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.03 —0.03 —309 309 0.01 < 0.005 —310 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.02 0.02 0.19 0.30 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —51.1 51.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —51.3 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————

Page 356 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 30 / 81
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Worker 0.29 0.28 0.25 4.47 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.22 0.22 —956 956 0.01 0.03 2.75 969 Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.85 0.47 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.25 0.01 0.07 0.07 —823 823 0.05 0.13 1.79 864 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.27 0.27 0.25 3.36 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.22 0.22 —877 877 0.01 0.03 0.07 887 Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.89 0.47 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.25 0.01 0.07 0.07 —824 824 0.05 0.13 0.05 863 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.05 0.05 —211 211 < 0.005 0.01 0.28 213 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 —195 195 0.01 0.03 0.18 204 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 —34.9 34.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 35.3 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —32.3 32.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 33.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 357 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 31 / 81
826—0.010.03823823—0.14—0.140.15—0.150.015.314.050.470.56Off-Roa d
Equipm
Paving 0.07 0.07 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.04 0.03 0.26 0.33 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —51.9 51.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 —52.0 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —8.59 8.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 —8.62 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

Page 358 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 32 / 81
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —13.6 13.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.25 2.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.28 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.10. Paving (2028) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.56 0.47 4.05 5.31 0.01 0.15 —0.15 0.14 —0.14 —823 823 0.03 0.01 —826 Paving 0.07 0.07 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————

Page 359 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 33 / 81
Off-Roa
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.26 0.33 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —51.9 51.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 —52.0 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —8.59 8.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 —8.62 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.06 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 —232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.67 235 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —13.6 13.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.25 2.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.28 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 360 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 34 / 81

3.11. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.01 —0.01 —134 134 0.01 < 0.005 —134 Architect
ural
Coating
s

4.78 4.78 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —8.05 8.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 —8.08 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.29 0.29 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————

Page 361 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 35 / 81

1.34—< 0.005< 0.0051.331.33—< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.0050.010.01< 0.005< 0.005Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.05 0.05 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.04 —191 191 < 0.005 0.01 0.55 194 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —10.7 10.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.77 1.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.12. Architectural Coating (2028) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

Page 362 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 36 / 81
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.01 —0.01 —134 134 0.01 < 0.005 —134 Architect
ural
Coating
s

4.78 4.78 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —8.05 8.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 —8.08 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.29 0.29 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —1.33 1.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.34

Page 363 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 37 / 81
————————————————0.050.05Architect
ural
Coating
Onsite
truck

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

Page 364 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 38 / 81
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall

1.07 0.96 0.92 9.16 0.02 0.02 2.21 2.23 0.01 0.56 0.58 —2,502 2,502 0.10 0.11 7.04 2,544 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

1.09 0.98 0.93 9.29 0.02 0.02 2.25 2.26 0.01 0.57 0.59 —2,539 2,539 0.11 0.11 7.14 2,582 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.16 1.94 1.85 18.5 0.05 0.03 4.46 4.49 0.03 1.13 1.16 —5,041 5,041 0.21 0.22 14.2 5,126 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall

1.01 0.90 0.99 7.62 0.02 0.02 2.21 2.23 0.01 0.56 0.58 —2,346 2,346 0.11 0.11 0.18 2,383 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

1.03 0.92 1.00 7.73 0.02 0.02 2.25 2.26 0.01 0.57 0.59 —2,381 2,381 0.11 0.11 0.19 2,418 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.04 1.82 1.99 15.3 0.05 0.03 4.46 4.49 0.03 1.13 1.16 —4,727 4,727 0.22 0.23 0.37 4,801 Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall

0.18 0.16 0.18 1.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 —392 392 0.02 0.02 0.50 399

Page 365 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 39 / 81
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

0.19 0.17 0.19 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.41 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 —398 398 0.02 0.02 0.51 405 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.37 0.33 0.37 2.91 0.01 0.01 0.81 0.82 0.01 0.21 0.21 —791 791 0.04 0.04 1.01 804

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall

1.07 0.96 0.92 9.16 0.02 0.02 2.21 2.23 0.01 0.56 0.58 —2,502 2,502 0.10 0.11 7.04 2,544 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

1.09 0.98 0.93 9.29 0.02 0.02 2.25 2.26 0.01 0.57 0.59 —2,539 2,539 0.11 0.11 7.14 2,582 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

1.01 0.90 0.99 7.62 0.02 0.02 2.21 2.23 0.01 0.56 0.58 —2,346 2,346 0.11 0.11 0.18 2,383

Page 366 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 40 / 81
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

1.03 0.92 1.00 7.73 0.02 0.02 2.25 2.26 0.01 0.57 0.59 —2,381 2,381 0.11 0.11 0.19 2,418 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.18 0.16 0.18 1.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 —392 392 0.02 0.02 0.50 399 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

0.19 0.17 0.19 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.41 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 —398 398 0.02 0.02 0.51 405 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.37 0.33 0.37 2.91 0.01 0.01 0.81 0.82 0.01 0.21 0.21 —791 791 0.04 0.04 1.01 804

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 367 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 41 / 81

45.9—< 0.005< 0.00545.745.7————————————Strip
Mall
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————165 165 0.02 < 0.005 —166
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
————————————570 570 0.05 0.01 —573
Total ————————————780 780 0.07 0.01 —785
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —45.9
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————165 165 0.02 < 0.005 —166
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
————————————570 570 0.05 0.01 —573
Total ————————————780 780 0.07 0.01 —785
Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————7.56 7.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 —7.61
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —27.4

Page 368 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 42 / 81

94.9—< 0.0050.0194.494.4————————————Enclose
d
Total ————————————129 129 0.01 < 0.005 —130

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —45.9
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————165 165 0.02 < 0.005 —166
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
————————————570 570 0.05 0.01 —573
Total ————————————780 780 0.07 0.01 —785
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —45.9
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————165 165 0.02 < 0.005 —166

Page 369 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 43 / 81
573—0.010.05570570————————————Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
Total ————————————780 780 0.07 0.01 —785
Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————7.56 7.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 —7.61
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —27.4
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
————————————94.4 94.4 0.01 < 0.005 —94.9
Total ————————————129 129 0.01 < 0.005 —130

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —9.35 9.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 —9.38 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

0.02 0.01 0.15 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —181 181 0.02 < 0.005 —182

Page 370 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 44 / 81

0.00—0.000.000.000.00—0.00—0.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.00Enclose d
Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —191 191 0.02 < 0.005 —191 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —9.35 9.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 —9.38 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

0.02 0.01 0.15 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —181 181 0.02 < 0.005 —182 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —191 191 0.02 < 0.005 —191 Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —1.55 1.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.55 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —30.0 30.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —30.1 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.6

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)Page 371 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 45 / 81
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —9.35 9.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 —9.38 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

0.02 0.01 0.15 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —181 181 0.02 < 0.005 —182 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —191 191 0.02 < 0.005 —191 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —9.35 9.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 —9.38 Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru

0.02 0.01 0.15 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —181 181 0.02 < 0.005 —182 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

Page 372 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 46 / 81
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —30.0 30.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —30.1 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.6

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Product
s

0.21 0.21 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.03 0.03 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

1.34 1.23 0.06 7.51 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.0 Total 1.58 1.48 0.06 7.51 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.0 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 373 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 47 / 81
Consum
Products

0.21 0.21 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.03 0.03 ————————————————
Total 0.24 0.24 ————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Consum
er
Product
s

0.04 0.04 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.01 0.01 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.17 0.15 0.01 0.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —3.50 3.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.52 Total 0.21 0.20 0.01 0.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —3.50 3.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.52

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Product
s

0.21 0.21 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.03 0.03 ————————————————

Page 374 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 48 / 81
Landsca
Equipment

0.21 0.21 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.04 0.04 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.01 0.01 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

Page 375 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 49 / 81
CO2eRN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGTOGLand Use
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————0.70 2.45 3.15 0.07 < 0.005 —5.48
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————2.88 9.78 12.7 0.30 0.01 —22.2
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.08
Total ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————0.70 2.45 3.15 0.07 < 0.005 —5.48
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————2.88 9.78 12.7 0.30 0.01 —22.2
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.08
Total ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————0.12 0.41 0.52 0.01 < 0.005 —0.91

Page 376 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 50 / 81
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————0.48 1.62 2.10 0.05 < 0.005 —3.67
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.01
Total ———————————0.59 2.04 2.63 0.06 < 0.005 —4.59

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————0.70 2.45 3.15 0.07 < 0.005 —5.48
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————2.88 9.78 12.7 0.30 0.01 —22.2
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.08
Total ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————0.70 2.45 3.15 0.07 < 0.005 —5.48

Page 377 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 51 / 81
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————2.88 9.78 12.7 0.30 0.01 —22.2
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.08
Total ———————————3.58 12.3 15.9 0.37 0.01 —27.7
Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————0.12 0.41 0.52 0.01 < 0.005 —0.91
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————0.48 1.62 2.10 0.05 < 0.005 —3.67
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.01
Total ———————————0.59 2.04 2.63 0.06 < 0.005 —4.59

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————

Page 378 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 52 / 81

9.80—0.000.282.800.002.80———————————Strip
Mall
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————30.7 0.00 30.7 3.07 0.00 —108
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————2.80 0.00 2.80 0.28 0.00 —9.80
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————30.7 0.00 30.7 3.07 0.00 —108
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————0.46 0.00 0.46 0.05 0.00 —1.62
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————5.09 0.00 5.09 0.51 0.00 —17.8

Page 379 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 53 / 81

0.00—0.000.000.000.000.00———————————Enclose
d
Total ———————————5.55 0.00 5.55 0.55 0.00 —19.4

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————2.80 0.00 2.80 0.28 0.00 —9.80
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————30.7 0.00 30.7 3.07 0.00 —108
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————2.80 0.00 2.80 0.28 0.00 —9.80
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————30.7 0.00 30.7 3.07 0.00 —108

Page 380 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 54 / 81

0.00—0.000.000.000.000.00———————————Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
Total ———————————33.5 0.00 33.5 3.35 0.00 —117
Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
———————————0.46 0.00 0.46 0.05 0.00 —1.62
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
———————————5.09 0.00 5.09 0.51 0.00 —17.8
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————5.55 0.00 5.55 0.55 0.00 —19.4

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————————0.03 0.03

Page 381 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 55 / 81

7.747.74————————————————Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
Total ————————————————7.77 7.77
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————————0.03 0.03
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————————7.74 7.74
Total ————————————————7.77 7.77
Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————————0.01 0.01
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————————1.28 1.28
Total ————————————————1.29 1.29

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————————0.03 0.03

Page 382 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 56 / 81
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————————7.74 7.74
Total ————————————————7.77 7.77
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————————0.03 0.03
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————————7.74 7.74
Total ————————————————7.77 7.77
Annual ——————————————————
Strip
Mall
————————————————0.01 0.01
Fast
Food
Restaurant
w/o Drive
Thru
————————————————1.28 1.28
Total ————————————————1.29 1.29

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

Page 383 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 57 / 81
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

Page 384 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 58 / 81
CO2eRN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGTOGEquipm ent
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

Page 385 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 59 / 81
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

Page 386 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 60 / 81

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

Page 387 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 61 / 81
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————Page 388 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 62 / 81
Remove ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————Page 389 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 63 / 81
Total ——————————————————

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————

Page 390 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 64 / 81
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 1/1/2027 1/31/2027 5.00 21.0 —
Grading Grading 2/1/2027 2/28/2027 5.00 20.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 3/1/2027 4/30/2028 5.00 305 — Paving Paving 5/1/2028 5/31/2028 5.00 23.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/1/2028 6/30/2028 5.00 22.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 148 0.41

Page 391 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 65 / 81
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

Page 392 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 66 / 81

0.3784.07.001.00AverageDieselPavingTractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition ————
Demolition Worker 10.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 19.7 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck ——HHDT
Grading ————
Grading Worker 7.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.95 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck ——HHDT
Building Construction ————
Building Construction Worker 72.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 28.3 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck ——HHDT
Paving ————
Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Page 393 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 67 / 81
Paving Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck ——HHDT
Architectural Coating ————
Architectural Coating Worker 14.4 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck ——HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition ————
Demolition Worker 10.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 19.7 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck ——HHDT
Grading ————
Grading Worker 7.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.95 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck ——HHDT
Building Construction ————
Building Construction Worker 72.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 28.3 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck ——HHDT
Paving ————
Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Page 394 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 68 / 81
Paving Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck ——HHDT
Architectural Coating ————
Architectural Coating Worker 14.4 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck ——HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 16,038 5,082 1,585

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic
Yards)
Material Exported (Cubic
Yards)
Acres Graded (acres)Material Demolished (Ton of
Debris)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,655 —
Grading 150 —15.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

Page 395 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 69 / 81
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres)% Asphalt
Strip Mall 0.00 0%
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 0.00 0%
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.61 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2027 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005
2028 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Strip Mall 270 270 270 98,558 3,121 3,121 3,121 1,139,221 Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
274 274 274 100,004 3,167 3,167 3,167 1,155,928
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Strip Mall 270 270 270 98,558 3,121 3,121 3,121 1,139,221

Page 396 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 70 / 81
1,155,9283,1673,1673,167100,004274274274Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 16,038 5,082 1,585

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

Page 397 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 71 / 81

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Strip Mall 48,155 346 0.0330 0.0040 29,183
Fast Food Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
173,580 346 0.0330 0.0040 565,641
Enclosed Parking with
Elevator
600,965 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Strip Mall 48,155 346 0.0330 0.0040 29,183
Fast Food Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
173,580 346 0.0330 0.0040 565,641
Enclosed Parking with
Elevator
600,965 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year) Strip Mall 366,659 16,059
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1,502,492 16,059
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 16,059

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year) Strip Mall 366,659 16,059 Page 398 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 72 / 81
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1,502,492 16,059
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 16,059

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Strip Mall 5.20 —
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 57.0 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Strip Mall 5.20 —
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 57.0 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

Page 399 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 73 / 81

1.000.000.600.001,430R-134aFast Food Restaurant
w/o Drive Thru
Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
Fast Food Restaurant
w/o Drive Thru
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
Fast Food Restaurant
w/o Drive Thru
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Fast Food Restaurant
w/o Drive Thru
Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
Fast Food Restaurant
w/o Drive Thru
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
Fast Food Restaurant
w/o Drive Thru
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load FactorPage 400 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 74 / 81

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

Page 401 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 75 / 81
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 19.6 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 6.05 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise —meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Page 402 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 76 / 81

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

Page 403 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 77 / 81
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 91.1
AQ-PM 99.1
AQ-DPM 69.9
Drinking Water 93.7
Lead Risk Housing 61.3
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 58.4
Traffic 30.6
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 80.4
Groundwater 0.00
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 11.5
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 0.00
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 54.3
Cardio-vascular 68.7
Low Birth Weights 59.2 Page 404 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 78 / 81
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 64.3
Housing 83.1
Linguistic 57.4
Poverty 76.9
Unemployment 93.3

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 12.81919672
Employed 61.27293725
Median HI 10.67624791
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 21.46798409
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 12.72937251
Transportation —
Auto Access 54.54895419
Active commuting 65.64865905
Social —
2-parent households 17.31040678
Voting 31.24598999
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 15.8475555
Park access 57.69280123
Retail density 89.00295137

Page 405 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 79 / 81
Supermarket access 9.303220839
Tree canopy 33.63274734
Housing —
Homeownership 8.494803028
Housing habitability 17.46439112
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 3.451815732 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 57.12819197
Uncrowded housing 44.92493263
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 42.43551906
Arthritis 40.2
Asthma ER Admissions 35.4
High Blood Pressure 59.9
Cancer (excluding skin)66.1
Asthma 13.4
Coronary Heart Disease 47.4
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 20.5
Diagnosed Diabetes 35.6
Life Expectancy at Birth 10.9
Cognitively Disabled 46.5
Physically Disabled 74.5
Heart Attack ER Admissions 37.0
Mental Health Not Good 17.1
Chronic Kidney Disease 45.1
Obesity 21.5
Pedestrian Injuries 83.8
Physical Health Not Good 21.1
Stroke 29.9

Page 406 of 475 ends

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 80 / 81
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 60.3
Current Smoker 17.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 25.6
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 50.1
Elderly 81.3
English Speaking 45.7
Foreign-born 39.4
Outdoor Workers 85.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 63.9
Traffic Density 31.1
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 63.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 33.8

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a)77.0
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b)21.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535)Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550)Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617)No Page 407 of 475

Upland Downtown Parking Structure Detailed Report, 4/9/2025 81 / 81
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use The project site is approximately 0.82 acres in size.

Construction: Construction Phases Based on the construction questionnaire Operations: Vehicle Data Trip rates are based on the Upland Downtown Commercial and Parking Structure project by MBI.

Page 408 of 475 ends

Appendix D: Trip
Generation Memo

Page 409 of 475 ends

Page 1 of 7 ends

Technical Memorandum
May 6, 2025
To: Josh Winter, Senior Planner – City of Upland
From: Jacob Swim TE, Michael Baker International
Cc: Robert Dalquest, Development Services Director – City of Upland

Subject: Downtown Commercial and Parking Structure – Trip Generation & VMT Screening Assessment

Introduction
The purpose of this memorandum is to document a vehicle mile traveled (VMT) assessment for the improvements to the Downtown Commercial and Parking Structure (Project) in support of the transportation component of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis. Specifically, a VMT screening analysis is documented in this memorandum. The Project proposes constructing a parking structure with approximately 407 spaces and approximately 9,900 square feet (SF) of retail on the ground floor.

Table 1 provides key Project information. Exhibit 1 shows the location of the Project and Exhibit 2 shows the conceptual site plan.

Table 1 – Project Information Summary
Item Description
Project Title Downtown Commercial and Parking Structure Project Location The Project is proposed at the southeast corner of C Street and 1 st Avenue in the City of Upland, California.

Surrounding Uses
The Project site is surrounded by C Street to the north, commercial to the south and east, and 1st Street to the west.

Existing Use The Project Site is currently used as a surface parking lot.

Proposed Use The Project consists of the development of a new parking structure with approximately 407 spaces and approximately 9,900 SF of retail on the ground floor.

Page 410 of 475 ends

Page 2 of 7 ends

In : Out In : Out
Strip Retail Plaza 822 54.45 /KSF 2.36 /KSF 60% : 40% 6.59 /KSF 50% : 50% Fast Casual Restaurant 930 97.14 /KSF 1.43 /KSF 50% : 50% 12.55 /KSF 55% : 45% 1 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Rates shown are based on average rates.

ITE
Code 1 Daily Trip Rate Total TotalLand Use AM Peak Hour Rate PM Peak Hour Rate Total In : Out Total In : Out
Strip Retail Plaza 4.95 KSF 270 12 7 : 5 33 16 : 17
Fast Casual Restaurant 4.95 KSF 481 7 4 : 3 62 34 : 28
-207 0 0 : 0 -27 -15 : -12
274 7 4 : 3 35 19 : 16
544 19 11 : 8 68 35 : 33
Notes:

KSF = 1,000 Square Feet
1 Pass-by trip reductions are based on ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition Land Use Daily Trips
AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips
Pass-By Trip Reduction (43%)1
Subtotal Fast Casual Restaurant Trips
Total Trip Generation
Intensity
Project Trip Generation
The Project site trips were estimated using trip generation equations from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition (2022)1. Table 2 provides the trip generation rates for a Strip Retail Plaza (ITE Land Use Code 822) and Fast Casual Restaurant (ITE Land Use Code 930). These land uses have been assumed for this Project to provide flexibility as the tenants are unknown at this time. Table 3 summarizes the vehicular trip generation forecast to be generated by the Project. In accordance with ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition2, a 43% pass-by trip reduction was applied to the Fast Casual Restaurant trips.

As shown in Table 3, during the weekday, the proposed Project is forecast to generate approximately 544 daily vehicle trips with 19 AM peak hour trips (11 inbound / 8 outbound), and 68 PM peak hour trips (35 inbound / 33 outbound).

Table 2 – ITE Trip Generation Rates

Table 3 – Project Trip Generation

VMT Assessment Guidelines & Methodology
The primary resource for this VMT screening assessment is the City of Upland Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines3 dated July 2020 (City Guidelines). As outlined in the City Guidelines, certain projects, because of their size, nature, or location, are exempt from the requirements of preparing a detailed VMT analysis.

The City has developed an approach to identified transportation impacts under CEQA for land-use

Page 411 of 475 ends

Page 3 of 7 ends

projects that aligns with guidance provided in the OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (2018)4. The City Guidelines provides screening criteria to determine if a development project is presumed to have a less-than-significant transportation impacts.

Screening Criteria
Each of the screening criteria outlined in the City Guidelines were evaluated for the proposed Project and the results are summarized in Table 4. As shown, the Project meets the screening criteria based on the “Project Type Screening” criterion identified below. Therefore, a detailed VMT analysis is NOT required, and the Project is presumed to have a less-than-significant transportation impact on the environment.

Table 4 – VMT Screening Criteria Summary
Screening Criteria Project Evaluation Result
Transit Priority
Area (TPA)
Screening
Projects located within a TPA may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project:

1. Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;

2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the City (if the City requires the project to supply parking);

3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the lead agency, with input from the Metropolitan Planning Organization); or

4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units
The Project is located
within a TPA according to
the SBCTA VMT
Screening Tool. However,
the other conditions are
not met.

1. FAR less than 0.75? –
Yes

2. Includes more parking
than required by City
Code? Yes

3. Consistent with the
SCS? Potentially

4. Replaces affordable
residential units? No
Screening
Criteria Is
Not Met
Low VMT Area
Screening
Residential and office projects located within a low VMT -generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other employment-related and mixed-use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area. A low VMT area is defined as an individual traffic analysis zone (TAZ) where total daily Origin/Destination VMT per service population is lower than the City average total daily Origin/Destination VMT per service population. To identify if the project is in a low VMT-generating area, the analyst may review the SBCTA screening tool and apply the appropriate threshold (identified later in this chapter) within the tool. Additionally, as noted above, the analyst must identify if the project is consistent with the existing land use within that traffic analysis zone (TAZ) and use professional judgement to determine that there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise The Project is not located
within a Low VMT Area
per the SBCTA VMT
Screening Tool.

Screening
Criteria Is
Not Met

Page 412 of 475 ends

Page 4 of 7 ends

Table 4 – VMT Screening Criteria Summary
Screening Criteria Project Evaluation Result
be mis-represented utilizing the data from the travel demand model. The SBCTA screening tool can be accessed at the following location: https://devapps.fehrandpeers.com/sbctavmt/
Project Type
Screening
Local serving retail buildings less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel. In addition to local serving retail, the following uses may, at the discretion of the City, be presumed to have a less than significant impact as their uses are often local serving in nature:
 Local parks
 Day care centers
 Local-serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet, including:
o Gas stations
o Banks
o Restaurants
o Shopping Center
 Student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses  Local-serving assembly uses (places of worship, community organizations)
 Community institutions (Public libraries, fire stations, local government)
 Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the RTP/SCS
 Hotels (non-destination or resort; no banquet or special event space)
 Affordable or supportive housing
 Assisted living facilities
 Senior housing (as defined by HUD)
 Projects generating less than 250 daily vehicle trips4 o This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials:
 26 single family housing units
 34 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units  25,000 sq. ft. of office
 50,000 sq. ft. of light industrial5
 143,000 sq. ft. of warehousing
 178,000 sq. ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse
The retail component of
the Project is local-
serving retail that
consists of 9,900 SF
which is less than the
50,000 SF threshold for
this screening.

Screening
Criteria Is
Met
Source: City of Upland Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, July 2020.

Page 413 of 475 ends

Page 5 of 7 ends

Conclusion
In conclusion, the VMT assessment conducted for the Downtown Commercial and Parking Structure Project demonstrates that the proposed development meets the established screening criteria outlined in the City of Upland Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. With a retail component of 9,900 square feet, the Project qualifies under the "Project Type Screening" criterion, indicating that it is presumed to have a less-than- significant transportation impact under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As a result, a detailed VMT analysis is not required, affirming that the Project’s anticipated effects on transportation infrastructure will remain within acceptable thresholds. Therefore, the Project is presumed to result in a less-than-significant transportation impact under CEQA, and a detailed VMT analysis is not required.

References

1. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Manual. 11th Edition. 2022.

2. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition.

3. City of Upland Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. July 2020.

4. Office of Planning and Research. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA.

State of California. December 2018.

Page 414 of 475 ends

Page 6 of 7 ends

EXHIBIT 1 – PROJECT LOCATION MAP

PROJECT SITE

Page 415 of 475 ends

Page 7 of 7 ends

EXHIBIT 2 – PROJECT SITE PLAN

Page 416 of 475 ends

DATE: October 13, 2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: STEPHEN PARKER, CPA, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

STACI SULLIVAN, FINANCE MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REVISED 2025 MASTER

FEE SCHEDULE

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution adopting the Revised 2025 Master Fee Schedule and amending certain citywide fees to cover the cost of services.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City’s goal of providing fiscal stewardship for the City of Upland .

BACKGROUND
On May 23, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 6658 adopting the Master Fee Schedule and directing the City Manager to return to Council within the next five years with a comprehensive Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study update. In the interim years, City Council authorized the City Manager to adjust Citywide user fees based on the January year-to-year increases in the local Consumer Price Index.

On August 14, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No. 6742 adopting a Master Fee Schedule.

On April 14, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution No. 6825 adopting a Master Fee Schedule.

The City’s “Master Fee Schedule” combines listings of City fees into a single document. Periodic publication of a revised Master Fee Schedule is recommended to: 1) maintain appropriate recovery ratios of service costs; 2) add or delete fees for service; and/or 3) incorporate pre-existing fees and charges that have not previously been included in the published Fee Schedule.

California law permits local government agencies to recover the full cost of providing user-related services from those who receive the benefit of the service. User fee -related services are those services where the customer is identifiable, the service is measurable, and the service can be withheld for non-payment. Full cost is defined as including both direct and indirect costs (overhead) of the service.

The objective of establishing a user fee is to recover all or part of the cost of providing a requested service from those who benefit directly, so as to limit or avoid subsidizing the service through use of General Fund revenue. However, recovery of full cost is not always feasible, or advisable. In some cases, the City Council may decide to reduce costs rather than increase fees and/or continue some level of General Fund subsidy. Further, cities may not set user fees at higher than the cost of providing the service.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Following approval of the 2025 Master Fee Schedule, staff has revisi ons to the existing schedule as well as new fees that need to be added. Specifically, those include:

 Updating the Solicitor’s Badge cost from $25 to $50. If the Solicitor returns the badge to the City following the 30 day issuance, the individual will be refunded $25.  Updating the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Assessment Filing Fee from $10 to $84. The $10 fee is what the State charges the City to add the account to the FTB. The addition of $74 will cover most staff costs associated with the administrative process involved.

Page 417 of 475 ends

 Changing the credit card rate to “Pass Through”. The City is working with our vendors to pass through credit card fees to customers. These fees vary depending on the vendor’s negotiated rate with their banking company. This update will allow the City to move forward with amending merchant agreements to proceed with the pass through.
 Recreation Facility Rentals. Update the fees to be consistent with other facility rentals and reflect the rental of the commercial kitchen at Magnolia North Hall.
 Police Department / Code Enforcement. Add the $100 Administrative Citation Fee for Electronic and Manual Citations. This fee covers staff time and materials to issue citations and was missed as part of the 2025 Master Fee Schedule update.

In accordance with Government Code Section 66018, notice of the meeting to discuss potential increases in fees was sent at least 14 days in advance to all interested parties who had filed a written request for no tice of the meeting on new or increased fees for service charges and a notice of public hearing was published once a week for two consecutive weeks at least 14 days prior to the hearing.

These fees will be effective as of October 14, 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a “project” and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The changes to the fees are intended to more accurately recover the cost of providing the service, and therefore, any revenue will have a budget-balancing effect.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Not a Project.

Page 418 of 475 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE MASTER FEE

SCHEDULE AND AMENDING CITYWIDE FEES FOR THE COST

OF SERVICES

WHEREAS, California law permits local government agencies to recover the full cost of providing user-related services from those who receive the benefit of the service; and

WHEREAS, California law requires that user-related fees for City services not exceed the estimated cost of providing the service for which the fee is levied and that no fee or service charge or increase in an existing fee or charge to which the fee or service charge levied without the opportunity for the public to make oral or written comment at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council; and

WHEREAS, fees set forth in the attached Master Fee Schedule and its exhibits do not exceed the estimated cost of the City providing services for which the fees are levied; and

WHEREAS, the Upland Municipal Code permits the City Council to establish the fees and charges provided herein by resolution; and

WHEREAS, a copy of the Master Fee Schedule is on file in the City Clerk’s office, the Upland Public Library, posted on the City’s website, and has been made available for public review in accordance with State law; and

NOW, THEREFORE , the City Council hereby finds, determines and resolves, as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. The attached Master Fee Schedule for Services and its various exhibits are herewith approved and adopted as the fees for various citywide regulatory activities and services.

Section 3. The City Finance Division shall be responsible for determining if any updates to this Master Fee Schedule are necessary and shall also be responsible for bringing such proposed updates to the City Council as needed.

Section 4. This Resolution shall prevail over any existing resolution in the event of a conflict.

Section 5. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds that this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has

Page 419 of 475 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 ends

no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Further, if the activity is deemed a project this City Council finds that this Resolution is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Section 6. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Section 8. Effective Date. The fees adopted in this Resolution shall become effective on October 14, 2025 and shall remain in effect until repealed or amended.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 2025.

Bill Velto, Mayor

I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 13th day of October, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

Page 420 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
CITY CLERK FEES:

Photocopies Each $0.25
Political Reform Act Reports and Statements Each $0.10
Notary Fee Each $15.00
Loan Reconveyance $320.00
Request for Copies
Flash drive $7.50
Request for Appearance/Records
Request for Records (Subpoena-records)Each $15.00
Subpoena-Appearance-City Employee Per Day $150.00
Subpoena-Appearance- Peace Officers Per Day $275.00
FINANCE FEES:

Business License:

Business License Application Each $20.00
State CASp Fee Each $4.00
Solicitor's Identification Badge - for 30 days*Each $50.00 Lien/Assessment Filing Fee Each $84.00
Lien Release Fee Each $22.00
Assessment correction fee Each $41.00
Franchise Tax Board (FTB) License Program Cost Assessment Filing Fee Per SSN $84.00
Return Check Charge - 1st Occurrence Each $25.00
Return Check Charge - 2nd Occurrence Each $35.00
Yard Sale Permit Each $9.00
Credit Card Convenience Fee Pass-Through
*$25 of this fee is refundable if the solicitor returns the badge to the City after 30 days

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 421 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025
Fee Description Unit dopted F
Fee Description 1st 4 Hours
Each Add'l
Hour 1st 4 Hours
Each Add'l
Hour 1st 4 Hours
Each Add'l
Hour
Carnegie - Great Room $100 $60 $300 $120 $500 $150
Gibson - Dining Hall $125 $20 $350 $60 $400 $60
Gibson - Arts & Crafts Room $60 $11 $150 $40 $200 $40
Magnolia - North Hall $125 $20 $350 $60 $400 $60
Magnolia - South Hall $50 $15 $225 $40 $275 $40
Magnolia - Courtyard FREE FREE $60 $15 $120 $30
Landecena - Main Hall $75 $15 $300 $60 $350 $60
Veteran's Monument - Courtyard FREE FREE $60 $15 $120 $30

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

FACILITY RENTALS
Upland Community
Based Organizations
Upland Residents or
Businesses
Non-Resident or For-
Profit Organization

Page 422 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

CODE ENFORCEMENT
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Administrative Citation Fee:

Electronic Citation Each $100.00
Manual Citation Each $100.00
Communication Fee Each $0.00
Administrative Hearing Fee:

Administrative Process/Request Fee Each $0.00
Hearing Officer Not to exceed per hour Actual Cost
Non-Refundable Administrative Fee Each $210.00
Collection Fees:

Franchise Tax Board - SSN Per SSN $0.00
Credit/Debit Card Transaction Fee Charged to the City Each $0.00 Credit/Debit Card Chargeback to the City Each $0.00
Fee for Payment Plan Initiated by the City Each $0.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 423 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
CITY CLERK FEES:

Business License Application Each $20.00
State CASp Fee Each $4.00
Solicitor's Identification Badge - for 30 days*Each $50.00 Lien/Assessment Filing Fee Each $84.00
Lien Release Fee Each $22.00
Assessment correction fee Each $41.00
Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Assessment Filing Fee Per SSN $84.00 Return Check Charge - 1st Occurrence Each $25.00
Return Check Charge - 2nd Occurrence Each $35.00
Yard Sale Permit Each $9.00
Credit Card Convenience Fee Pass-Through
*$25 of this fee is refundable if the solicitor returns the badge to the City after 30 days

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 424 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

LIBRARY
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Overdue Fines
All books (unless specified on this schedule)Day (after 3 week loan)$0.00 Audio-visual materials Day (after 1 week loan)$0.00
DVD Day (after 1 week loan)$0.00
Replacement Costs:

All materials (unless specified on this schedule)Item
Retail Price + $5.00
Processing Fee
Other Fees:

Obituary requests Item $20.00
Historic photograph request Item $45.00
Replacement charge for Library Card Item $2.00
Replacement charge for Item Barcodes Item $2.50
Damaged library materials fee Each
Up to replacement
cost of item + $5.00
processing fee
Photocopy Request (includes 1st page) -Black & White Each $0.15 Photocopy Request (includes 1st page) -Color Each $0.75

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 425 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

ANIMAL SERVICES
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
ANIMAL CONTROL FEES:

Animal License (1 Year):

Altered Each $24.00
Unaltered Each $50.00
Altered - Senior rate (65 yrs. and over)Each $10.00
Altered Each $48.00
Unaltered Each $100.00
Altered - Senior rate (65 yrs. and over)Each $20.00
Animal License (3 Year):

Altered Each $72.00
Unaltered Each $150.00
Altered - Senior rate (65 yrs. and over)Each $30.00
Microchipping of dogs- Resident Each Set by Vendor
Microchipping of dogs - Non-resident Each Set by Vendor Lost Dog Tag Per household/address $18.00
Vaccinations *Each Set by Vendor
Animal Late Registration **Each $40.00
ADOPTION FEES:

Dog - Mixed breed/Purebred (includes spay/neutering fee)Each Set by Vendor Cat - Mixed breed/Purebred (includes spay/neutering fee)Each Set by Vendor Senior Rate
Dog- Mixed Breed/Purebred (includes spay/neutering fee)Each Set by Vendor Cat- Mixed Breed/ Purebred (includes spay/neutering fee)Each Set by Vendor Adoption Amendments Each Set by Vendor
Veteran Rate
Dog- Mixed Breed/Purebred (includes spay/neutering fee)Each Set by Vendor Cat- Mixed Breed/ Purebred (includes spay/neutering fee)Each Set by Vendor IMPOUNDS AND RELEASES:

Altered
1st time Per household/address $65.00
2nd time Per household/address $65.00
3rd time +Per household/address $65.00
Unaltered1
Owner Initiated Impound Each NA
Animal Boarding Per day $20.00
Animal pickup and disposal Each $50.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
(*) Subject to sales tax.
(**) This is a penalty, not a fee.
(1) This fee is comprised of a state mandated portion based on CA Food/Agric Code 30804.7 and 31751.7 (eff. 01/01/00), an unaltered fee base and a CA Gov't allowed unaltered fee.

Animal License (2 Year):

Page 426 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Trips and Excursions
Actual Cost
+ 12% Admin Fee
Recreation Contract Classes
Actual Cost
+ 30% Admin Fee
Upland Community Foundation Skate Park Per Hour (5 hour min)$150.00 Baldy View Dog Park Per Hour $150.00
SPORTS FIELDS:

Field or Park Site Permits Each Request $10.00
Sports Fields key deposit Deposit $100.00
Sports Fields (CBSOs)Per Hour, Per Field $3.00
Sports Fields (Non-Resident Youth Sports Organizations)Per Hour, Per Field $15.00 Sports Fields (Private Reservations or
For-Profit Sports Organizations)Per Hour, Per Field $30.00 Basketball Court Rental
CBSOs Per Hour/Per Court $4.00
Non-resident, Private, Adult Sports Reservations Per Hour/Per Court $20.00 Sports Field Lights
Softball & Baseball Fields (CBSOs)Per Hour $4.00
Softball & Baseball Fields
(Non-Resident Youth Sports Organizations)Per Hour $20.00 Softball & Baseball Fields
(Private Reservations or For-Profit Sports Organizations)Per Hour $20.00 Cabrillo Park Soccer Complex - North Side (CBSOs)Per Hour $2.75 Cabrillo Park Soccer Complex - North Side
(Non-Resident Youth Sports Organizations)Per Hour $25.00 Cabrillo Park Soccer Complex - North Side
(Private Reservations or For-Profit Sports Organizations)Per Hour $25.00 Cabrillo Park Soccer Complex - South Side (CBSOs)Per Hour $5.00 Cabrillo Park Soccer Complex - South Side
(Non-Resident Youth Sports Organizations)Per Hour $25.00 Cabrillo Park Soccer Complex - South Side
(Private Reservations or For-Profit Sports Organizations)Per Hour $25.00 Premier Baseball Field Per Hour $150.00
Premier Softball Field Per Hour $150.00
PARK FACILITY USAGE FEES:

Atwood Kitchen & Picnic Area (includes stage) +Per Hour (4 hour min)$40.00 Greenbelt Picnic Area Per Hour (4 hour min)$30.00
Sheltered Gazebos +Per Hour (4 hour min)$30.00
All Other Picnic Facilities +Per Hour (4 hour min)$15.00 Park Monitor Fee +Per Hour $45.00
Bouncer and Specialized Entertainment Equipment Permit Fee Each Request $30.00 Non-Upland Resident Each Request $30.00
(+) Plus Park Securiy Deposit

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 427 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Park Security Deposit:
1 - 50 people Deposit $50.00
51 - 100 people Deposit $100.00
100 + people Deposit $200.00
GIBSON SENIOR CENTER - ROOM RENTAL FEES:

Dining Room / Arts & Craft Room / Game Room Rental
CBSOs and UUSD See Facility Rentals
Upland Residents or Businesses See Facility Rentals
Non-Resident or For-Profit Organizations See Facility Rentals MAGNOLIA RECREATION CENTER - ROOM RENTAL FEES:

North Hall / South Hall Rental
CBSOs and UUSD See Facility Rentals
Upland Residents or Businesses See Facility Rentals
Non-Resident or For-Profit Organizations See Facility Rentals

LANDACENDA COMMUNITY BUILDING - ROOM RENTAL FEES

Page 428 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Main Room / Room A Rental
CBSOs and UUSD See Facility Rentals
Upland Residents or Businesses See Facility Rentals
Non-Resident or For-Profit Organizations See Facility Rentals FACILITY & PARK RENTAL FEES/DEPOSITS:

Facility Rental Application Fee Each Request $10.00
Administration Fee (Required if Alcohol is to be Served)Each Request $50.00 Security Deposit Refundable $500.00
Damage Deposit - Facilities Refundable $500.00
Special Services Fee**Each Request $100.00
Change Fee Each Request $10.00
Facility Cancellation Fee***Each Request $100.00
PASSPORT FEES:

Passport Photos 2 Photos $12.00
Passport Acceptance Fee Each $35.00
Overnight Postage Each Current Postage Rate
ANDREW CARNEGIE LIBRARY AND CULTURAL CENTER RENTAL FEES:

Great Room Rental Rate See Facility Rentals
Downstairs Conference Room *Flat fee $50.00
West Courtyard *Flat fee $200.00
Special Service Fee Hour $100.00
Site Supervisor Fee Per hour $45.00
Damage Deposit Refundable $500.00
(*) The downstairs conference room and/or West Courtyard must be rented in conjunction with the Great Room (**) Landecena/Senior Center
(***) If cancelled, in person, at least two weeks before event.

Page 429 of 475 ends

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

FACILITY RENTALS
Upland Community
Based Organizations
Upland Residents or
Businesses
Non-Resident or For-
Profit Organization

Page 430 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

POLICE DEPARTEMENT
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Alarm Permits:

Residential Each $78.00
Commercial Each $78.00
No Permit Fine Each $25.00
Renewal Each $10.00
False Alarms:
1st time Per Response $0.00
2nd time Per Response $75.00
3rd Time Per Response $220.00
4th time Per Response $250.00
5th time +Per Response $260.00
False 9-1-1 Calls Each $160.00
Crime & Traffic Report Each $30.00
DUI Charges Each $20.00
Blood/Alcohol analysis Each $200.00
ABC Letter Each $34.00
Party Fee Each $145.00
Booking Fee (Recovery)Each $186.00
Civil Subpoenas Each $275.00
Carry Concealed Weapon:

New Permit Each $370.00
Renewal Permit Each $250.00
Conduct Letter Each $40.00
Bicycle License - 1 Year Each $10.00
Bicycle License - Renewal/Transfer Each $7.50
Vehicle Impound Release Each $300.00
Administrative Tow Hearing Each $90.00
Vehicle Storage Fee:

Car/Motorcycle Per day, per vehicle $80.00
Motor home or larger Per day, per vehicle $130.00
Vehicle Repossession Fee Each $15.00
Subpoena Duces Tecum --$50.00
Photographs - Small Each $90.00
Photographs - Enlarged Each $90.00
Photos (CD/DVD)Each $90.00
Vehicle Parking Violations:

Citation Sign Off (Non-Resident)Each $30.00
Citation Sign Off (Resident)Each $25.00
Citation Sign Off Handicap Parking (Non-Resident)Each $25.00 Citation Sign Off Handicap Parking (Resident)Each $25.00 Duplicate Citations Each $20.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 431 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Fee Description Unit
Adopted Fee
Passenger Vehicle
Adopted Fee
Commerical Vehicle

PARKING CITATION BAIL SCHEDULE
UMC Bail Schedule:

Commercial Vehicle in Residential District Each $0.00 $100.00 Commercial Vehicle Commercial District over 4 Hours Each $0.00 $100.00 Vehicle on Street over 72 Hours Each $56.00 $75.00
Violation of Sign Posted/Curb Marking Each $50.00 $75.00 City Park - Designated Area Only Each $50.00 $75.00
Alley Parking Prohibited Each $50.00 $75.00
Not Collected for Electric Charging Purposes Each $75.00 $100.00 Permit Parking Only Each $50.00 $75.00
2 Hour Parking Only Each $50.00 $75.00
Stop/Stand/Park at Red Curb Each $50.00 $75.00
Commercial Vehicle/Equipment on Private Property or
Residential District Each $0.00 $100.00
Unpaved Parking Each $50.00 $75.00
Inoperative Vehicle on Private Property Each $50.00 $150.00 Late Penalty Each $50.00 $50.00
CA State Bail Schedule:

High School Parking Each $50.00 $75.00
On or Across Sidewalk Each $50.00 $75.00
Designated Fire Lane Each $100.00 $100.00
Right Wheels over 18" from Right Curb Each $50.00 $75.00 Designated Disable Space Each $400.00 $400.00
Stop/Park within 15' of Fire Hydrant Each $75.00 $75.00 Blocking a Driveway Each $50.00 $75.00
Display of Vehicle License Each $100.00 $135.00
Registration Tabs Required Each $100.00 $135.00
Parking Within 20' of Marked/Unmarked Crosswalks Each $77.50 $77.50 All other Violation Each $50.00 $75.00
Late Penalty Each $50.00 $50.00
Late Penalty (Designated Disable Space)Each $150.00 $150.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 432 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

CODE ENFORCEMENT
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Administrative Citation Fee:

Electronic Citation Each $100.00
Manual Citation Each $100.00
Communication Fee Each $0.00
Administrative Hearing Fee:

Administrative Process/Request Fee Each $0.00
Hearing Officer Not to exceed per hour Actual Cost
Non-Refundable Administrative Fee Each $210.00
Collection Fees:

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 433 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

PLANNING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Adult Businesses:

Adult Business - Conditional Use Permit Each $9,300.00
Adult Business Extension of Amortization Each $10,760.00 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Permit Each $1,160.00
Airport Land Use Committee Review Each $5,090.00
Annexation Request (applicant requested)Each $15,880.00 Appeals to Planning Commission:

Public Hearing item Each $6,190.00
Public Hearing Item (SFR)Each $3,920.00
Appeals to City Council:

Public Hearing Item Each $6,480.00
Public Hearing Item (SFR)Each $4,030.00
Bonds and Documents:

Bond Agreements (Deposit Per consultants Est.)Each Deposit Varies Covenants and Easements Each $3,430.00
Contract Review Each $4,210.00
Conditional Use Permits:

Conditional Use Permit or Modification Each $7,220.00
Continuation of Public Hearing:

Renotice Required Each $1,830.00
No Renotice Required Each $1,740.00
Development Agreement Each Deposit Varies
Environmental:

Environmental Infill Exemption Review Each $1,300.00
Negative Declaration Preparation Each $4,930.00
Mitigated Negative Declaration Preparation Each
Deposit $5,000
to $10,000
Environmental Impact Report (Deposit $10,000)Initial Deposit $10,000 Initial
Deposit
General Plan Amendment Each $9,450.00
Historic Structures:

Designation to Local Register (SFR)Each $0.00
Designation to Local Register (Comm/Ind)Each $0.00
Minor Alteration (SFR)Each $100.00
Minor Alteration (Comm/Ind)Each $200.00
Major Alteration (SFR)Each $200.00
Major Alteration (Comm/Ind)Each $400.00
Partial Demolition (SFR)Each $210.00
Partial Demolition (Comm/Ind)Each $420.00
Complete Demolition (SFR)Each $3,360.00
Complete Demolition (Comm/Ind)Each $4,550.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 434 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

PLANNING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Mills Act Each $1,100.00
Noticing:

Notice of Filing Sign Deposit Each $1,000.00
Public Hearing Fee Each $1,000.00
Specific Plan:

Specific Plan Each $15,340.00
Specific Plan Amendment Each $6,510.00
Street Vacation Each $9,190.00
Subdivisions:

Tentative Parcel Map Each $9,800.00
Tentative Parcel Map - SB 9 Urban Lot Split Each $1,940.00 Tentative Tract Map Each $11,930.00
Tentative Tract Map Addressing Each $400.00
Lot Line Adjustment Each $2,510.00
Lot Merger Each $2,510.00
Subdivision: Reversion to Acreage Each $7,820.00
Underground Utilities Waiver Each $4,950.00
Variance:

First Request Each $5,910.00
Each Additional (w/ same applic.)Each $2,390.00
Request for Single Family Home Each $3,170.00
Zone Change Each $9,790.00
Zone Code Text Amendment Each $11,140.00
Administrative Determination:

Administrative Use Permit (AUP) New Development Each $5,770.00 Administrative Use Permit (AUP) Complex Each $4,400.00
Administrative Use Permit (AUP) Minor Each $1,070.00
Administrative Use Permit (AUP) Short Term Rental Each $950.00 Administrative Use Permit (AUP) Home Occupation Each $620.00 Preliminary Review One Review $3,270.00
Massage Operator Permit Each $1,590.00
Housemoving Permit Each $9,180.00
Sidewalk Vending - Private Property Each $640.00
Minor Adjustment Each $960.00
Time Extension Each $940.00
Similarity of Use Review Each $1,680.00
Change of Use Each $1,070.00
Zoning Clearance Each $160.00
Home Occupations Each $160.00
Zoning Verification / Rebuild Letters Each $500.00
Reasonable Accommodations Each $0.00

Page 435 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

PLANNING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Design Review:

DR - Administrative Determination / Minor Design Review Each $1,200.00 Architectural Plans Each $1,960.00
Landscape/Lighting Plans Each $2,310.00
Master Sign Program Review Each $1,600.00
Sign Design Review Each $380.00
Downtown A-Frame Sign Each $40.00
SB 9 - Two Unit Project Each $1,660.00
Site Plan Review:

Site Plan: Project Review First Review $6,550.00
Small Wireless Facilities:

Small Wireless Facilities Permit - Up to 5 sites Each Batch $500.00 Each Additional site - 6 or more ($100 per site)Each additional $100.00 New Pole to support one or more small wireless facility Each $1,000.00 Recurring annual fee for right-of-way access Each $270.00 Special Event Permit:

Regular Each $320.00
Non-Profit Community Organization Each $100.00
Special Event Vender Fee (up to 2 days, each day, each vendor) Each vendor, each day, up to
2 consecutive days $10.00
Special Event Vender Fee (3 plus days, each day, each vendor) Each vendor, 3 or more
consecutive days $20.00
Film Permit (No Street Closure)Each $1,320.00
Temporary Sign Permit:

Real Estate /Subdivision /Construction signs Each $700.00 Sales Promotion/ Community Activity Signs
Each New Sign Max 8-
weeks/ quarter $290.00
Temporary Use Permit:

Temporary Use Permit - Regular Each $1,180.00
Temporary Use Permit - POD Each $90.00
Plan Check:

Landscape/Irrigation Plan Check Each $170.00
The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City including supplies, equipment and the fully burdened rate of staff involved. A deposit may be required, as determined by the Development Services Director, for complex projects, negotiations or use of third party vendors. These deposit fees are determined by third party vendor contracts, invoicing by contract employees and projects that are major or complex in nature, that exceed the billable staff rate to complete. The amounts will be varied based on the scope of the project. Only true cost is billed to the applicant and any overage in deposit is refunded a􀅌􀅌er comple􀅌􀅌on of the project.

Per an amendment to the Master Fee Schedule in Resolution No. 5929 adopted by the City Council on June 8, 2009, additional fees may be required to cover the total cost of application/permit processing incurred by the City. These fees cover the hourly wages and benefits of the employees involved in providing the service, supervision, overhead, equipment, and any third party costs incurred by the City

Page 436 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Lease Agreements Each $3,200.00
Lease / DDA / OPA Amendments Each $2,100.00
Disposition Development Agreements Each $5,300.00
Owner Participation Agreement Each $5,300.00
Letter Agreement / License Amendment Each $420.00
License Agreement Each $1,000.00
Memorandum of Understanding Each $3,210.00
Loan Reconveyances Each $300.00
Release of Agreements-Documents Each $760.00
Right of Entry Agreements Each $480.00
Rent Rate Analysis Each $280.00
Mobile home rent review Each $1,620.00
Engineering Review of Legal Description Each At cost
Appraisal Review Each At cost
Subordination Each $360.00
Regulatory Agreement Deposit $5,000.00
Other Inspection Fees:

Weed Abatement Inspection/Assessment - Notice to Comply $160.00 Weed Abatement Inspection/Assessment - Notice to Abate
(additional hourly cost for over 4 hours)$430.00
Warrant request $140.00
Abatement supervision $390.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City including supplies, equipment and the fully burdened rate of staff involved. A deposit may be required, as determined by the Development Services Director, for complex projects, negotiations or use of third party vendors. These deposit fees are determined by third party vendor contracts, invoicing by contract employees and projects that are major or complex in nature, that exceed the billable staff rate to complete. The amounts will be varied based on the scope of the project. Only true cost is billed to the applicant and any overage in deposit is refunded after completion of the project.

Page 437 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

BUILDING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEES:

Plan check fee $200.00
Additional Plan Review (required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans)Minimum $200.00
Accessibility Review $150.00
Energy Review $150.00
Review of Geotechnical Reports Submitted with Plans or Separate per hour $70.00 Electrical Review $70.00
Mechanical Review $70.00
Plumbing Review $70.00
Residential Remodel to Existing Structure per hour $220.00 Non-Residential Remodel/Tenant Improvement to Existing Structure per hour $290.00 Additional Mechanical, Plumbing and/or Electrical Plan Review per hour $220.00 Tract Repeats Single Family Residence Attached or Detached 25% of
Plan Check Fee
BUILDING PERMIT FEES:

Building Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Tract Repeats
Single Family Dwelling Attached or Detached Full Permit Fee full fee based per valuation ValuationBased Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees
Reinstatement of Expired Permit
Each + Orig. Permit Fee or as
modified by Building Official $280.00
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
Each + Orig. Permit Fee or as
modified by Building Official $360.00

BUILDING INSPECTION FEES
Building Inspection Fee Each $180.00
Building Re-inspection Fee Each $220.00
Inspections outside of normal business hours Maximum 4 Hours $440.00 Certificate of Inspection Business License Issuance Inspection Each $220.00 PATIO PERMIT FEES:

Patio Building Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Lattice Aluminum/Wood
100 Sq Ft Per City Standard (no plan check fee)Each $500.00 Solid Aluminum/Wood
100 Sq Ft Per City Standard (no plan check fee)Each $660.00 Enclosure 100 Sq Ft Per City Standard (no plan check fee)Each $800.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 438 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

BUILDING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
REMODEL/ALTERATION PERMIT FEES:

Kitchen Remodel (Residential) Per City Standard Each $610.00 Bathroom Remodel (Residential) Per City Standard Each $530.00 REROOFING PERMIT FEES:

Reroof Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Reroof up to 2,000 square feet Each $270.00
Reroof 2,001 to 5,000 square feet Each $290.00
Reroof 5,001 to 10,000 square feet Each $430.00
Reroof over 10,001 square feet Each $630.00
POOL AND SPA PERMIT FEES:

Pool or Spa Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Residential Pool Conventional (gunite) 1,000 Sq Ft Each $1,050.00 Residential Spa Conventional (gunite)Each $500.00
Residential Portable Pool or Spa above grade Each $420.00 Non-Residential Pool Conventional (gunite)Each $1,050.00 Non-Residential Spa Conventional (gunite)Each $650.00
Non-Residential Pool or Spa Above Grade Each $500.00
WALL PERMIT FEES:

Wall Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Free-Standing Block Wall
Per City Standard up to 6 feet high & up to 100 linear feet Each $620.00 Per City Standard up to 6 feet high over 100 linear feet per additional
10 ft over 100 $80.00
Retaining Wall
Per City Standard up to 6 feet high & up to 100 linear feet Each $750.00 Per City Standard up to 6 feet high over 100 linear feet per additional
10 ft over 100 $110.00
Combined Retaining and Free-Standing Wall
Per City Standard up to 100 linear feet Each $690.00
Per City Standard over 100 linear feet
per additional
10 ft over 100 $100.00
OTHER PERMIT FEES:

Other Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Demolition (Per Structure)Each $470.00
Soft Demo of Non-Bearing Walls Each $260.00
Cell Tower (Flat fee plan check and permit)Each $2,630.00 Cell Antenea attached to Building Each $320.00
Combination Permit Issuance Fee Each $130.00
General Plan Update Fee
6% of the
Permit Fee

Page 439 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

BUILDING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Penalty for Not Obtaining a Permit
150% of the
Permit Fee
Window Change 1-5 Each $280.00
Window Change Out each additional after first 5 Each $50.00 New Sign All Types (First 3 signs)Each $260.00
New Sign All Types (each additional sign)Each $110.00
New Sign All Types with Electrical (First 3 signs)Each $450.00 New Sign All Types with Electrical (each additional sign)Each $210.00 Stucco/siding existing building up to 5000 square feet Each $570.00 Stucco/siding existing building > - 5001 square feet Each $1,150.00 Re-drywall interior of an existing building up to 5,000 SF Each $500.00 Re-drywall interior of an existing building > 5,000 SF Each $1,020.00 Review of Alternate Methods and Material:

Modification Request (4 Hour Minimum)Each $720.00
Review of Alternate Methods and Material:

Modification Request (Each Additional Hour or Fraction)Each $150.00 Photovoltaic System (PV) 0 – 10 Kilo Volt Amperes (KVA)Each $450.00 Photovoltaic System (PV) 10.1 – 50 Kilo Volt Amperes (KVA)Each $770.00 Photovoltaic System 50.1 and greater Kilo Volt Amperes (KVA)Each $1,510.00 Miscellaneous/Other Permit not Covered Elsewhere Hourly $170.00 Pre-approved ADU plans Each $410.00
Pre-approved ADU plan Template Review Each $200.00
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES:

Electrical Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Electrical Supplemental Permit Issuance Fee Each $50.00 Electrical Fixtures (outlets, switches, lights, fans)
First 10 in any combination Each $50.00
Each additional after first 10 Each $4.00
Temporary Power
Service Equipment/Sub Panels (0-200 Amps)Each $310.00
Service Equipment/Sub Panels (over 200 Amps)Each $420.00 New and Upgrade to Service Equipment/Sub Panels
0 up to 200 Amperes Each $380.00
201 up to 400 Amperes Each $460.00
401 up to 800 Amperes Each $650.00
Over 800 Amperes Each $800.00
Over 600 Volts Each $930.00
Electrical Vehicle Chargers
Single Family Residence Each $160.00
Multi-Family Dwelling Each $360.00
Commercial, Non-Residential Each $510.00
Level 3, D.C. Fast Charger, Induction Charger Each $650.00

Page 440 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

BUILDING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Other
Each Branch Circuit Breaker 120 Volts Single Phase Each $60.00 Each Branch Circuit Breaker 240 Volts Single Phase Each $70.00 Each Branch Circuit Breaker any Voltage 3 Phase Each $80.00 Each Electric Sign Per Transformer Each $110.00
Each Motion Picture Projector Each $150.00
Generators 0-100 KVA Each $320.00
Generators over 100 KVA Each $410.00
Transformers less than 112.5 KVA Each $320.00
Transformers 112.5 KVA or Greater Each $390.00
Other items not covered elsewhere (residential and non-residential)Each $170.00 Up to and including 1 Horsepower Each $50.00
Over 1 and not over 10 Horsepower Each $80.00
Over 10 and not over 50 Horsepower Each $160.00
Over 50 and not over 100 Horsepower Each $220.00
Over 100 Horsepower Each $300.00
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES:

Mechanical Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Supplemental Mechanical Issuance Permit Fee Each $60.00 Forced air or gravity type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,00Btu/h Each $160.00 Forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner over 100,000 Btu/h Each $160.00 Floor furnace, including vent Each $160.00
Suspended or recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater Each $160.00 Replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit Each $100.00
Repair, alteration, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this Code Each $100.00 Boiler or compressor up to and including three (3) horsepower, or each absorption system up to and including 100,00 Btu/h Each $100.00 Boiler or compressor over 3 horsepower up to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h up to and including 500,000 Btu/h Each $130.00
Boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower up to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h up to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h Each $130.00
Boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower up to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h and up to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h Each $200.00
Boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Each $230.00

Page 441 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

BUILDING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Air handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto Each $100.00
Air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm Each $100.00
Evaporative cooler other than portable type Each $50.00 Ventilation fan connected to a single duct Each $20.00
Ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air- conditioning system authorized by a permit Each $100.00 Installation of a hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including ducts for such hood Each $320.00
Additional Hood system commercial Each $280.00
Domestic-type incinerator Each $160.00
Commercial or industrial-type incinerator Each $320.00
Appliance or price of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this Code Each $130.00
Valance box with ducts or duct system Each $130.00
Addition or extension of duct to a register (supply or return) from existing Each $100.00
Smoke Detectors in ducts/Fire/Smoke Dampers Each $100.00

PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Plumbing Permit Issuance Fee Each $80.00
Supplemental Plumbing Issuance Permit Fee Each $60.00
Plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, draining piping and backflow protection)Each $40.00 Building sewer repair, replacement, new or addition Each $130.00 Rainwater systems Each, per drain $320.00
Private sewage disposal system Each system $320.00
Water heater and/or vent Each $100.00
Gas piping system of 1 to 4 outlets Each $100.00
Gas piping system of 5 or more outlets Each $50.00
Industrial waste pre-treatment interceptor, including its trap and vents, except kitchen type grease interceptor functioning as fixture trap Each $320.00
Installation, alteration or repair of water piping and/or water treating equipment Each $320.00
Repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping Each $160.00 Lawn sprinkler system on any one meter including backflow protection devices therefore Each $160.00
Vacuum breakers or backflow protection devices on tanks, vats, etc., or for installation on unprotected plumbing fixtures including necessary water piping 1-5 Each $160.00
Vacuum breakers or backflow protection devices on tanks, vats, etc., or for installation on unprotected plumbing fixtures including necessary water piping 6 or more Each $100.00

Page 442 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

BUILDING
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Vacuum breakers or backflow protection devices on tanks, vats, etc., or for installation on unprotected plumbing fixtures including necessary water piping over 2"Each $100.00
Sewer Cap Each $70.00
Earthquake shut off valve Each $50.00
On-site Sewer Manhole Each $80.00
Grease and Sand Interceptor, Including Vent Each $100.00 Water Piping or Re-pipe per Unit Each $130.00
Installation of Water Service, Alteration, Replacement or Repair Each $100.00 Sewer Ejector Each $80.00
Other Items/Fixtures not Covered Elsewhere (Residential and Non- Residential)Each $70.00
The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City including supplies, equipment and the fully burdened rate of staff involved. A deposit may be required, as determine by the Development Services Director, for complex projects, negotiations or use of third party vendors. These deposit fees are determined by third party vendor contracts, invoicing by contract employees and projects that are major or complex in nature, that exceed the billable staff rate to complete. The amounts will be varied based on the scope of the project. Only true cost is billed to the applicant and any overage in deposit is refunded afer completionof the project.

A penalty will apply for failure to obtain a permit before commencing any work for which a permit is required.

EXCEPTION: emergency repair work where a permit was obtained within 72 hours of commencing work.

Page 443 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025
Minimum Value Maximum Value Base Rate Additional For Every $0 $2,000 $380.00 $0.00 $100
$2,001 $25,000 $380.00 $33.74 $1,000
$25,001 $50,000 $1,155.99 $36.33 $1,000
$50,001 $100,000 $2,064.23 $24.77 $1,000
$100,001 $500,000 $3,302.73 $18.58 $1,000
$500,001 $1,000,000 $10,733.78 $11.56 $1,000
$1,000,001 and over $16,513.49 $7.71 $1,000
Cost Recovery Level = 100%
Minimum Value Maximum Value Base Rate Additional For Every $0 $2,000 $180.00 $0.00 $100
$2,001 $25,000 $180.00 $22.64 $1,000
$25,001 $50,000 $700.60 $22.02 $1,000
$50,001 $100,000 $1,251.05 $15.01 $1,000
$100,001 $500,000 $2,001.65 $11.26 $1,000
$500,001 $1,000,000 $6,505.32 $7.01 $1,000
$1,000,001 and over $10,008.18 $4.67 $1,000
Minimum Value Maximum Value Base Rate Additional For Every $0 $2,000 $200.00 $0.00 $100
$2,001 $25,000 $200.00 $11.10 $1,000
$25,001 $50,000 $455.39 $14.31 $1,000
$50,001 $100,000 $813.18 $9.76 $1,000
$100,001 $500,000 $1,301.07 $7.32 $1,000
$500,001 $1,000,000 $4,228.46 $4.55 $1,000
$1,000,001 and over $6,505.32 $3.04 $1,000

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

BUILDING PERMIT FEE
(Including Processing, Plan Check and Permit)

BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEES

BUILDING PERMIT FEES

Page 444 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, TRAFFIC
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Public Improvement Plan Check Fees First two sheets $6,310.00 Final Tract Map or Parcel Map Each $6,360.00
Erosion Control & Other Improvement, On-Site Utility, Demo, Horizontal Control, Traffic Control First two sheets $5,920.00 Precise Grading Plan - Residential First two sheets $5,030.00 Commercial/Industrial Precise Grading Plan Check Fee First two sheets $5,630.00 Rough Grading Plan Check Residential & Commercial First two sheets $4,220.00 Landscape Private Plan Check Fee Minimum fee, plus $2,850.00 Landscape Public Plan Check Fee Each $2,850.00
Composite Utility Plans per sheet $1,680.00
As-Built Plan Minimum fee $1,900.00
Revisions Minimum fee $1,480.00
Certificate of Correction, Dedications, Easements and Grants Each + Pass-thru Fees $1,510.00 Miscellaneous Permits - Inspection Fee Includes drive approaches, sewer laterals, etc.:

No Plan Check Each $290.00
With required plan check Each $210.00
Lot Line Adjustment / Parcel Merger Each $2,530.00
Public Works Inspection Deposit - Required for each permit based on the complexity of the project.

Public Works Inspection (Regular Time)per hour $160.00
Public Works Inspection (Over Time)
per hour
(2 hour minimum)$230.00
Legal Description - Checking Fee Per description $1,350.00 Priority Plan Checking and Extra Plan checks:

Transportation
Full Lane Closure Permit

Inspector Time $330.00
Partial Lane Closure Permit

Inspector time $410.00
PW Traffic Control Inspection (RT)Per hour $160.00
PW Traffic Control Inspection (OT)Per hour, 2 hr min $230.00 Stop Sign Warrant Study (Actual Consultant Cost)Each $325.00 Speed Survey Per location $325.00
Reports
Hydrology Minimum fee $2,160.00
Soils Minimum fee $1,480.00
WQMP Minimum fee $2,360.00
SWPPP Minimum fee $1,520.00
CC&Rs
Minimum fee, plus additional
City Attorney Fees and
Consultant pass-thru costs $1,470.00
Traffic Studies

additional consultant costs $2,490.00
Miscellaneous Reports & Technical Documents Minimum fee $2,330.00 Street/Alley Vacation per application $1,510.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Plan checking fees quoted above cover three plan check reviews. An additional plan check review fee, required for the additional review of the project, will be charged based on time and material.

Page 445 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025

DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, TRAFFIC
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Street Dedication per application $1,480.00
Agreements
Bond Calculation Review
Minimum fee, plus Plan Check
reviewers hourly rate $1,000.00
Miscellaneous Agreements
Minimum fee, plus Plan Check
reviewers hourly rate & City
Attorney fees $1,610.00
Declaration of Covenant for Parkway Landscape Maintenance Minimum fee plus Plan Check
reviewers hourly rate $1,780.00
Encroachment License Agreement
Minimum fee, plus Plan Check
reviewers hourly rate & City
Attorney rate for additional
plan checks $1,770.00
Reimbursement Agreement Each $1,570.00
Outside City Utility Service Agreement
Each, plus 15% additional of
outside agency and/or
consultant costs $2,740.00
Development Impact Fee Deferral
Deferral Agreement Per agreement, plus $500.00
Deferral Tracking, Preparing Demands for Payment & Partial Reconveyances per lot Per lot $250.00
Waste Management Plan
Remodel less than 1,000 sf Minimum fee $340.00
Remodel more than 1,000 sf Minimum fee $500.00
New Construction 1,000-3,000 sf SFR Minimum fee $500.00 New Construction 3,000+ sf SFR Minimum fee $500.00
New Construction Commercial & Industrial ($10,000 Max)Per 1,000 sf $720.00 Miscellaneous
Engineering Record Research Request Deposit $190.00
Utility Research Request Per hour $300.00
Composite Utility Plan Minimum fee $2,630.00
Parking Permit Decal- Residential Only (Includes 5 Decals)Each $50.00 Parking Permit Decal- Residential Only Individual Decal Each $10.00 Applicant/Developer Technical Meetings at request of
Applicant/Developer:Minimum fee $210.00
Principal Engineer Per hour $310.00
Associate Engineer Per hour $190.00
Assistant Engineer Per hour $210.00
Engineering Technician Per hour $160.00
Consultant Fees
Actual Pass-
thru Costs
The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City including supplies, equipment and the fully burdened rate of staff involved. A deposit may be required, as determined by the Public Works Director, for complex projects, negotiations or use of third party vendors. These deposit fees are determined by third party vendor contracts and projects that are major or complex in nature, that exceed the billable staff rate to complete. The amounts will be varied based on the scope of the project. Only true cost is billed to the applicant and any overage in deposit is refunded after completion of the project.

Page 446 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025
WATER
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Turn-On Water:
8AM - 4:30PM Each $75.00
After 4:30PM Each $150.00
Turn-Off Water:
8AM - 4:30PM Each $75.00
After 4:30PM Each $150.00
NOTE: Turn-On & Turn-off will be done typically within a 6 hour window from the time of the request.

Emergency Turn-Off:

After 4:30PM Each $150.00
Emergency: After hours, homeowner or current resident calls and requests that water be turned off.

Deposit (Refundable):

Commercial Bi-monthly bill 2 month average
Delinquent Notice Each $15.75
Lock Off Fee Each $40.00
Turn-On Reconnection Fee:
8AM - 4:30PM Each $75.00
After 4:30PM Each $150.00
Re-read Meter (Customer Request):
1 Free per calendar year Each; after 1 re-read $41.00
48-Hour Notice (Tagging)Each tag $25.00
Service Stop Damage/Replacement

service $347.00
Broken Lock Each $148.00
Broken Clam Shell Lock Each $148.00
Meter Tampering Repair Each occurrence $253.00
Meter Tampering Penalty Each occurrence $500.00
Meter Abandonment Each $2,646.00
Water Sample (Special Customer Request)Each $131.00
Fire Flow Test Each $281.00
Pressure Test (Customer Request)Each $51.00
Service Stop Exercising Each $51.00
Annual Backflow Test Notification and Processing Each $17.00 Residential Backflow Inspection Fee Each $25.00
Commercial Backflow Inspection Fee Each $35.00
Units Served Charge (Bi-Monthly Cycle):
1 Unit per unit/billing cycle $0.00
2 or more Units per unit/billing cycle $1.30
Jumper Charge:
1" jumper (5/8", 3/4" & 1" meters)Each $112.00

1.5" jumper (1.5" meter)Each $112.00
2" jumper (2" meter)Each $112.00

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 447 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025
WATER
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Temporary Meter Charge (Jumper - Bi-Monthly cycle)
1" jumper (5/8", 3/4" & 1" meters)per unit/billing cycle $236.00

1.5" jumper (1.5" meter)Each $472.00
2" jumper (2" meter)Each $755.00
Plan check Per page
See Engineering/
Development Fee
Schedule
Water Main Connection:

Front Footage Fee Per front foot $48.00
Deduction for "double frontage""Feet" ONLY
Meter Box Each $177.00
Hydrant Meter Deposit Each
Actual Material Costs
+ 2 Months Average
Service Charge
Hydrant Monthly Service Charge Monthly $190.00
Meter Installation for New Development:
5/8 inch meter Each $371.00
3/4 inch meter Each $421.00
1 inch meter Each $496.00
1 - 1/2 inch meter Each $1,206.00
2 inch meter Each $1,412.00
2 inch turbine meter (special)Each $1,798.00
2" meter compound Each $2,766.00
3" meter compound Each $3,162.00
4" meter compound Each $4,584.00
The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City including supplies, equipment and the fully burdened rate of staff involved. A deposit may be required, as determined by the Public Works Director, for complex projects, negotiations or use of third party vendors. These deposit fees are determined by third party vendor contracts and projects that are major or complex in nature, that exceed the billable staff rate to complete. The amounts will be varied based on the scope of the project. Only true cost is billed to the applicant and any overage in deposit is refunded after completion of the project.

Page 448 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025
SEWER
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee
Non-Domestic Wastewater Discharge Permit
Permit Fees:

Categorical & Significant Noncat.Each permit/year NA
Major Users Each permit/year $296.00
Minor Users Each permit/year $263.00
Zero Dischargers Each permit/year $263.00
Inspection Fees:

Major User Inspection Each Inspection $177.00
Minor User Inspection Each Inspection $158.00
Zero Dischargers Each Inspection $103.00
Other Non-Domestic Discharges Each permit/year $166.00
Storm Water Regulation (NPDES) Inspection Various $353.00 Sampling Fee Each sampling event $215.00
Other Fees:

Sewer Dye Test (Customer Requested)Each $349.00
Delinquent Notice Each $15.75
Sewer Permit Fees:

Sewer Line TV Inspection Charges Per person/hour
Pass-through fee if
City requests work on
behalf of customer
Sewer Call-out with backhoe or Loader per event $640.00 Sewer Call-out with Vacuum Truck per event $1,398.00
Sewer Call-out Backhoe/Loader and Vacuum Truck per event $1,508.00 Sewer/Connection Fees:

Sewer Connection Fee Each request
Determined by Public
Works Director
Sewer Development Impact Fee Each request
Subject to change,
based on resolutions
set by city council
Regional Sewer Capacity - New Construction/ Improvement Residential Units Per dwelling unit $8,132.00
Commercial Units:

Category I - (Motel, hotel, recreation, amusement, fast food, restauran Per fixture unit $361.06 Category II - (Market w/butcher shop, bakery, mortuary)Per fixture unit $879.07 Category III - (Convalescent home, hospital, health spa, full-service rest Per fixture unit $1,447.50 Category IV - (Laundromat, Laundry, Dry Cleaners)Per fixture unit $2,032.19 Category V - (Carwash)Per fixture unit $3,992.81
Category VI - (Church, school, public facilities)Per fixture unit $512.32 Category VII- (Health spa w/o pool, Laundromat)Per fixture unit $1,264.53

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE

Page 449 of 475 ends

Effective October 14, 2025
SEWER
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee

CITY OF UPLAND

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Industrial Units:

Domestic Waste Calculated EDU Units $8,132.00
Non- Domestic Waste Per fixture unit $602.58
Industrial Units:

Domestic Waste Calculated EDU Units $1,305.00
Non-Domestic Waste Per fixture unit $97.00
Categorical & Significant Noncategorical permi􀅌􀅌ng ac􀅌􀅌vity (and fee) is provided by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). Fee for this service is absorbed through the City's payments of IEUA sewerage treatment service.

Pass-through fees collected and paid to Inland Empire Utilities Agency.

Vacuum breakers or backflow protection devices on tanks, vats, etc., or for installa􀅌􀅌on on unprotected plumbing fixtures including necessary water piping 1-4

Page 450 of 475 ends

Adoption of the Revised
2025 Master Fee
Schedule
Administrative Services Department
City Council Meeting
October 13, 2025
Stephen Parker, Assistant City Manager Staci Sullivan, Finance Manager

Page 451 of 475 ends

Background
•The City’s “Master Fee Schedule” combines listings of
City fees into a single document.
•Periodic revisions are recommended in order to:
•Maintain appropriate recovery ratios of service
costs;
•Add or delete fees for service; and/or
•Incorporate pre-existing fees and charges that have
not previously been included in the published Fee
Schedule.

Page 452 of 475 ends

Background
•On April 28, 2025, the City Council adopted the 2025
Master Fee Schedule
•The Master Fee Schedule went into effect as of July 1, 2025.

Page 453 of 475 ends

Master Fee Schedule Revisions
•Update the Solicitor Badge cost from $25 to $50, with a $25 refund if the badge is returned to the City.
•Update the FTB Assessment Filing Fee from $10 to $84
to recoup staff costs.
•Change the credit card fee to pass through. This will allow the City to update current merchant agreements
to pass through credit card fees to customers.

Page 454 of 475 ends

Master Fee Schedule Revisions
•Update Recreation Facility rentals to be consistent for all City facilities. As well as, add rental of Magnolia North Hall for the commercial kitchen.
•Update Code Enforcement administration citation fees
to $100 for non-refundable staff costs.

Page 455 of 475 ends

Recommendation
•Approve a Resolution adopting the Revised
2025 Master Fee Schedule and amending
certain citywide fees to cover the cost of
services.

Page 456 of 475 ends

Thank you!

Page 457 of 475 ends

DATE: October 13, 2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: ROBERT DALQUEST, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR

ALAN FRENCH, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER

HARRY PARR, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER AWARD OF BID FOR PROJECT NO. 85002, FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SAFETY PROJECT (BID NO. 2026 -001)

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the Plans and Specifications for Project No. 85002; award the construction contract to Econolite Systems, Inc in the amount of $1,347,561.30; and authorize a construction contingency in the amount of $202,438.70 for a total amount of $1,550,000.00 .

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City’s goal of maintaining and improving the City’s transportation infrastructure.

BACKGROUND
In September 2022, the City completed the Local Roadway Safety Plan. This study examined traffic collision history throughout the City and identified priority projects eligible for grant funding through the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).

On June 10, 2024, the City Council accepted the HSIP Cycle 11 grant of $1,861,560 (reimbursable grant) for the design and construction of traffic signal hardware improvements as identified in the Local Roadway Safety Plan. Also, the City signed a contract with Kimley-Horn to prepare the construction documents for the signal improvements in the amount of $164,336 which was paid for from the awarded grant.

The City recently completed design and construction documents for traffic signal hardware improvements at 54 intersections throughout the City. Specific improvements include removal of existing signal heads and replacement with new 12” LED signal heads with reflective backplates, and replacement of older pedestrian signal heads with new countdown pedestrian signal heads.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The project was advertised on July 25, 2025 and August 1, 2025 in accordance with the California Public Contract Code (Section 20164) and was also posted on the City’s website and PlanetBids. On August 27, 2025, the City received and opened 13 bids for the project, under Bid No. 2026-001, as follows:

BIDDER BID AMOUNT
Econolite Systems, Inc. $1,347,561.30
Elecnor Belco Electric $1,392,657.00
Crosstown Electrical & Data, Inc. $1,484,765.00
Global Road Sealing, Inc. $1,486,830.00
Select Electric, Inc. $1,495,900.00
Yunex LLC $1,534,945.00
ILB Electric $1,571,003.00
Servitek Electric, Inc. $1,625,283.00
Bear Electrical Solutions, LLC $1,630,430.00
California Professional Engineering, Inc. $1,812,814.00 DBX, Inc. $1,894,196.00

Page 458 of 475 ends

Ferreira Construction Co, Inc. $1,945,220.00
Sierra Pacific Electrical $2,006,905.34

The lowest responsible bidder was Econolite Systems, Inc of Anaheim, California, with a base bid of $1,347,561.30.

The City has reviewed all 13 bid packages and confirmed that Econolite Systems is the lowest responsible and responsive bidder.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and the State CEQA Guidelines, and determined to be categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c) (Existing Facilities), of the CEQA guidelines. The project involves repair and maintenance of existing public facilities and does not involve any expansion of use beyond that which is existing. In accordance with Section 15062 of the CEQA guidelines, the City will file the Notice of Exemption with the County of San Bernardino within 5 days after project approval.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The total estimated project cost is $1,580,000.00 as detailed below. There are available budgeted funds in the Capital Project Account No. 4257500-5540-85002 which will be reimbursed by the HSIP Grant:

Estimated Project Costs
Base Bid Amount $1,347,561.30
Construction Contingency $202,438.70
Total Contract Work: $1,550,000.00

Construction Administration and Inspection $30,000.00
Total Estimated Project Cost: $1,580,000.00

ALTERNATIVES

1. Reject all bids and authorize the City Clerk to re-advertise the Project. Due to a successful bidding process staff does not recommend this alternative.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c) (Existing Facilities), of the CEQA guidelines. In accordance with Section 15062 of CEQA, the City will file the Notice of Exemption with the County of San Bernardino within 5 days after project approval.

Page 459 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-1- CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
This Contract for Construction (“Contract”), No. 85002 is made and entered into this 13th day of October, 2025 by and between the CITY OF UPLAND , with its principal place of business at 460 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland, California 91786 sometimes hereinafter called the “City” and Econolite Systems, Inc., sometimes hereinafter called “Contractor.” WITNESSETH: That the parties hereto have mutually covenanted and agreed, and by these presents do covenant and agree with each other as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF WORK.

The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated in the Contract, and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in Article 5, below, for the following Project:

Project No. 85002
FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal
Modification Safety Project
Contractor is an independent contractor and not an agent of the City. The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to the City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation.

ARTICLE 2. TIME FOR COMPLETION.

Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work. The Work shall be commenced on the date stated in the City’s Notice to Proceed. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within two hundred (200) calendar days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work.

ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT PRICE.

The City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of one million three hundred forty-seven thousand five hundred sixty-one Dollars and thirty cents ($1,347,561.30). Any work above $1,347,561.30 up to $1,550,000.00 for unforeseen conditions, change orders, etc. is at the City’s sole and absolute discretion. Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions. The City will pay to Contractor compensation based upon the prices set forth in the Bid Schedule.

ARTICLE 4. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.

Contractor acknowledges that the City will sustain actual damages for each and every Day completion of the Project is delayed beyond the Contract Time. Because of the nature of the Project, it would be impracticable or extremely difficult to determine the City’s actual damages.

Accordingly, in accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the

Page 460 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-2- CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Contractor will pay the City the sum of $250 for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event this is not paid, the Contractor agrees the City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract. This Section does not exclude recovery of other damages specified in the Contract Documents. Liquidated damages may be deducted from progress payments due Contractor, Project retention or may be collected directly from Contractor, or from Contractor's surety. These provisions for liquidated damages shall not prevent the City, in case of Contractor's default, from terminating the Contractor.

ARTICLE 5. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT.

The “Contract Documents” include the following:

Notice Inviting Bids
Instructions to Bidders
Bid Forms
Bid Acknowledgement
Bid Schedule
Bid Guarantee
Designation of Subcontractors
Information Required of Bidders
Non-Collusion Declaration Form
Iran Contracting Act Certification
Public Works Contractor DIR Registration Certification
Levine Act Disclosure
Performance Bond
Payment (Labor and Materials) Bond
Contract for Construction
General Conditions
Special Conditions
Specifications
Addenda
Construction Plans and Drawings (Drawing No. SI-85002)
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction “Greenbook”, latest edition, Except Sections 1-9
Applicable Local Agency Standards and Specifications, as last revised Reference Specifications
Approved and fully executed Change Orders
Permits
Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract The Contractor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents.

All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. In the event of conflict, the various Contract Documents will be given effect in the order set forth in the General Conditions. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties.

Page 461 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-3- CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION

ARTICLE 6. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW AND CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE.

Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to this Work.

ARTICLE 7. INDEMNIFICATION.

Contractor shall provide indemnification and defense as set forth in the General Conditions.

ARTICLE 8. PREVAILING WAGES.

Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at the City’s Office or may be obtained online at http://www.dir.ca.gov and which must be posted at the job site.

ARTICLE 9. FALSE CLAIMS.

Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is submitted to the City, it may be considered fraud and Contractor may be subject to criminal prosecution. Contractor acknowledges that the False Claims Act, California Government Code sections 12650, et seq., provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false claim to a public entity. These provisions include within their scope false claims made with deliberate ignorance of the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. In the event the City seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its litigation costs, including attorneys’ fees. Contractor hereby acknowledges that the filing of a false claim may the Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding wherein Contractor may be prevented from further bidding on public contracts for a period of up to five (5) years. [REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

Page 462 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-4- CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written.

CITY OF UPLAND
By:

Bill Velto, Mayor

ATTEST:

By:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

ECONOLITE SYSTEMS, INC.

[IF CORPORATION, TWO SIGNATURES,

PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT AND
SECRETARY OR TREASURER REQUIRED]
By:

Its:

Printed
Name:

By:

Its:

Printed
Name:

____________________________________
Contractor’s License Number and
Classification

____________________________________
DIR Registration Number

(CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURE MUST BE

NOTARIZED AND CORPORATE

SEAL AFFIXED, IF APPLICABLE)

END OF CONTRACT

Page 463 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-5- CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Notary Acknowledgment
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ______________
On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally

appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory

evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public

OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual
Corporate Officer

Title(s) Title or Type of Document
Partner(s) Limited
General Number of Pages
Attorney-In-Fact
Trustee(s)
Guardian/Conservator Date of Document
Other:

Signer is representing:

Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies)

Signer(s) Other Than Named Above

Page 464 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-6- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS

00 61 13 – BOND FORMS
Performance Bond
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:

THAT WHEREAS, the CITY OF UPLAND , with its principal place of business at 460 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland, California 91786 (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) has awarded to Econolite Systems, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”) an agreement for Contract No. 85002, (hereinafter referred to as the “Project”).

WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more particularly set forth in the Contract Documents for the Project dated July 25, 2025, (hereinafter referred to as “Contract Documents”), the terms and conditions of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor is required by said Contract Documents to perform the terms thereof and to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said Contract Documents.

NOW, THEREFORE, we, ______________________, the undersigned Contractor and ________________________________________________ as Surety, a corporation organized and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the sum of One million three hundred forty-seven thousand five hundred sixty-one dollars and thirty cents, ($1,347,561.30), said sum being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total amount of the Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if the Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the Contract Documents and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on its part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill all obligations including the one (1) year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and authorized volunteers, as stipulated in said Contract Documents, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by the City in enforcing such obligation.

As a condition precedent to the satisfactory completion of the Contract Documents, unless otherwise provided for in the Contract Documents, the above obligation shall hold good for a period of one (1) year after the acceptance of the work by the City, during which time if Contractor shall fail to make full, complete, and satisfactory repair and replacements and totally protect the City from loss or damage resulting from or caused by defective materials or faulty workmanship. The obligations of Surety hereunder shall continue so long as any obligation of Contractor remains. Nothing herein shall limit the City’s rights or the Contractor or Surety’s

Page 465 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-7- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS

obligations under the Contract, law or equity, including, but not limited to, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 337.15.

Whenever Contractor shall be, and is declared by the City to be, in default under the Contract Documents, the Surety shall remedy the default pursuant to the Contract Documents, or shall promptly, at the City’s option:
i. Take over and complete the Project in accordance with all terms and conditions in the Contract Documents; or
ii. Obtain a bid or bids for completing the Project in accordance with all terms and conditions in the Contract Documents and upon determination by Surety of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, arrange for a Contract between such bidder, the Surety and the City, and make available as work progresses sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion of the Project, less the balance of the contract price, including other costs and damages for which Surety may be liable. The term “balance of the contract price” as used in this paragraph shall mean the total amount payable to Contractor by the City under the Contract and any modification thereto, less any amount previously paid by the City to the Contractor and any other set offs pursuant to the Contract Documents.
iii. Permit the City to complete the Project in any manner consistent with California law and make available as work progresses sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion of the Project, less the balance of the contract price, including other costs and damages for which Surety may be liable. The term “balance of the contract price” as used in this paragraph shall mean the total amount payable to Contractor by the City under the Contract and any modification thereto, less any amount previously paid by the City to the Contractor and any other set offs pursuant to the Contract Documents.

Surety expressly agrees that the City may reject any contractor or subcontractor which may be proposed by Surety in fulfillment of its obligations in the event of default by the Contractor.

Surety shall not utilize Contractor in completing the Project nor shall Surety accept a bid from Contractor for completion of the Project if the City, when declaring the Contractor in default, notifies Surety of the City’s objection to Contractor’s further participation in the completion of the Project.

The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract Documents or to the Project to be performed thereunder shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract Documents or to the Project.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

Page 466 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-8- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _______ day of ______________, 20___.
(Corporate Seal)
Contractor/ Principal
By
Title
(Corporate Seal)
Surety
By
Attorney-in-Fact
(Attach Attorney-in-Fact Certificate) Title
The rate of premium on this bond is ____________ per thousand. The total amount of premium charges is $_______________________________.
(The above must be filled in by corporate attorney.)

THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM
Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
___________________________________________
(Name and Address of Agent or ___________________________________________ Representative for service of ___________________________________________ process in California, if different ___________________________________________ from above)
(Telephone number of Surety ___________________________________________ and Agent or Representative for
service of process in California)

Page 467 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-9- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ______________
On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally

appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual
Corporate Officer

Title(s) Title or Type of Document
Partner(s) Limited
General Number of Pages
Attorney-In-Fact
Trustee(s)
Guardian/Conservator Date of Document
Other:

Signer is representing:

Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies)

Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
NOTE: This acknowledgment is to be completed for Contractor/Principal.

Page 468 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
-10- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ______________
On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally

appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual
Corporate Officer

Title(s) Title or Type of Document
Partner(s) Limited
General Number of Pages
Attorney-In-Fact
Trustee(s)
Guardian/Conservator Date of Document
Other:

Signer is representing:

Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies)

Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
NOTE: This acknowledgment is to be completed for the Attorney-in-Fact. The Power-of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must also be attached.

END OF PERFORMANCE BOND

Page 469 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
11 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

Payment Bond (Labor and Materials).

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That
WHEREAS, the CITY OF UPLAND , with its principal place of business at 460 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland, California 91786 (hereinafter designated as the “City”), by action taken or a resolution passed October 13, 2025, has awarded to Econolite Systems, Inc., hereinafter designated as the “Principal,” a contract for the work described as follows: Contract No. 85002 (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more particularly set forth in the Contract Documents for the Project dated July 25, 2025, (hereinafter referred to as “Contract Documents”), the terms and conditions of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, said Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with said contract; providing that if said Principal or any of its Subcontractors shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender, equipment, or other supplies used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of said Principal and its Subcontractors with respect to such work or labor the Surety on this bond will pay for the same to the extent hereinafter set forth.

NOW THEREFORE, we, the Principal and __________________________ as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the penal sum of One million three hundred forty-seven thousand five hundred sixty-one dollars and thirty cents, ($1,347,561.30) lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that if said Principal, his or its subcontractors, heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall fail to pay any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 9100, fail to pay for any materials, provisions or other supplies, used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the contract, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department or Franchise Tax Board from the wages of employees of the contractor and his subcontractors pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18663, with respect to such work and labor the Surety or Sureties will pay for the same, in an amount not exceeding the sum herein above specified, and also, in case suit is brought upon this bond, all litigation expenses incurred by the City in such suit, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs, expert witness fees and investigation expenses.

This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 9100 so as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

It is further stipulated and agreed that the Surety on this bond shall not be exonerated or released from the obligation of this bond by any change, extension of time for performance, addition, alteration or modification in, to, or of any contract, plans, specifications, or agreement

Page 470 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
12 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

pertaining or relating to any scheme or work of improvement herein above described, or pertaining or relating to the furnishing of labor, materials, or equipment therefore, nor by any change or modification of any terms of payment or extension of the time for any payment pertaining or relating to any scheme or work of improvement herein above described, nor by any rescission or attempted rescission or attempted rescission of the contract, agreement or bond, nor by any conditions precedent or subsequent in the bond attempting to limit the right of recovery of claimants otherwise entitled to recover under any such contract or agreement or under the bond, nor by any fraud practiced by any person other than the claimant seeking to recover on the bond and that this bond be construed most strongly against the Surety and in favor of all persons for whose benefit such bond is given, and under no circumstances shall Surety be released from liability to those for whose benefit such bond has been given, by reason of any breach of contract between the owner or the City and original contractor or on the part of any obligee named in such bond, but the sole conditions of recovery shall be that claimant is a person described in Civil Code Section 9100, and has not been paid the full amount of his claim.

The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract to be performed thereunder, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of Contract, including but not limited to, the provisions of Sections 2819 and 2845 of the California Civil Code.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _______ day of ______________, 20__.
(Corporate Seal)
Contractor/ Principal
By
Title
(Corporate Seal)
Surety
By
Attorney-in-Fact
(Attach Attorney-in-Fact Certificate) Title

Page 471 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
13 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ______________
On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally

appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual
Corporate Officer

Title(s) Title or Type of Document
Partner(s) Limited
General Number of Pages
Attorney-In-Fact
Trustee(s)
Guardian/Conservator Date of Document
Other:

Signer is representing:

Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies)

Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
NOTE: This acknowledgment is to be completed for Contractor/Principal.

Page 472 of 475 ends

FY2023/2024 Citywide Traffic Signal Modification
Safety Project
14 PLANS AND DRAWINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ______________
On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally

appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual
Corporate Officer

Title(s) Title or Type of Document
Partner(s) Limited
General Number of Pages
Attorney-In-Fact
Trustee(s)
Guardian/Conservator Date of Document
Other:

Signer is representing:

Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies)

Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
NOTE: This acknowledgment is to be completed for the Attorney-in-Fact. The Power-of-Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must also be attached.

END OF PAYMENT BOND

Page 473 of 475 ends

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
California Government Code SecƟon 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits City Officers from parƟcipaƟng in any acƟon concerning a license, permit, other enƟtlement for use, franchise, or contract (collecƟvely “license, permit, or contract”) if they receive poliƟcal contribuƟon(s) from a party, or its agent(s), totaling more than $500 within the twelve (12) months before the proceeding, while a proceeding is pending, and for twelve (12) months following the date of a ﬁnal decision in a proceeding.

The Levine Act also requires a member of the Upland City Council who has received such a contribuƟon to disclose the contribuƟon on the record of the proceeding and recuse themselves before the proceeding unless the violaƟon has been properly cured.

Current Upland City Council Members are listed at:
hƩps:// www.uplandca.gov/city-council-treasurer
ParƟes and their Agents are responsible for accessing the link to review the names and disclosing their applicable contribuƟons to City Officers on the record of a proceeding.

As a party to a proceeding, you are also required to provide informaƟon below about contribuƟons made by you, your agents on behalf of you or your organizaƟon, your organizaƟon subject to the proceeding with the City, and any organizaƟon you direct or control pursuant to the aggregaƟon rules at FPPC Reg. § 18438.5, except for uncompensated officers of a nonproﬁt organizaƟon. This form is to be submiƩed to the City of Upland and is a public record. If you have any quesƟons about this form, please contact your City representaƟve for assistance.

1.Have you or your company, or any agent/board member on behalf of you or your company/enƟty, made any poliƟcal contribuƟons of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or applicaƟon, or the anƟcipated date of any Council acƟon?
___ YES If yes, please idenƟfy the Council Member(s):
___ NO

2. Do you or your company/enƟty, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/enƟty, anƟcipate or plan to make any poliƟcal contribuƟon of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months following any Council acƟon related to your proposal or applicaƟon? ___ YES If yes, please idenƟfy the Council Member(s):
___ NO
Answering yes to either of the two quesƟons above does not preclude the Upland City Council from awarding a contract or approving an applicaƟon or any subsequent acƟon. It does, however, preclude the idenƟﬁed Council Member(s) from parƟcipaƟng in any acƟons related to your proposal or applicaƟon. _________________ _____________________________
Date Signature of authorized individual
_____________________________
Company/Applicant Name
(Levine Act deﬁniƟons on reverse side)
09/24/2025
Econolite Systems, Inc. / Christopher Flores
✔
✔

Page 474 of 475 ends

LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DEFINITIONS
Term Definition Law
Covered
"proceedings"
A proceeding to grant, deny, revoke, restrict, or modify a license, permit or other entitlement for use, that
does not solely involve purely ministerial decisions
and is:
(1) Applied for by the party;
(2) Formally or informally requested by the party; or
(3) A contract between the agency and the party or a
franchisee granted by the agency to the party, other
than a contract that is competitively bid, a labor
contract, or a personal employment contract.

FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)
Party
Any person who files an application for, or is the
subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use.

Gov. Code 84308(a)(1)
Participant
Any person who is not a party but who actively
supports or opposes a particular decision in a
proceeding involving a license, permit, or other
entitlement for use and who has a financial interest in the decision. A person actively supports or opposes a
particular decision in a proceeding if that person
lobbies in person the officers or employees of the
agency, testifies in person before the agency, or
otherwise acts to influence officers of the agency.

Gov. Code 84308(a)(2)
FPPC Reg 18438.4
Agent
A person who represents a party or participant for
compensation and appears before or otherwise
communicates with the governmental agency for the
purpose of influencing the pending proceeding. See
FPPC Reg 18438.3 for exceptions for certain
consultants.

FPPC Reg 18438.3
Competitively Bid
A contract required by law to be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder with a responsive bid, or, if the
successful bidder refuses or fails to execute the
contract, to the next lowest bidder with a responsive
bid.

FPPC Reg
18438.2(a)(3)(A)
Labor Contract
A contract or agreement reached through collective
bargaining or with a representative group regarding
the salary, benefits, or terms and conditions under an
employment or retirement policy for employees or
retirees, including a project labor agreement entered
under Public Contract Code Section 2500.

FPPC Reg
18438.2(a)(3)(B)
Personal
Employment
Contract
A contract for employment, including the terms and
conditions of employment, between the agency and
an agency employee. A contract with an independent
contractor is NOT a personal employment contract.

FPPC Reg
18438.2(a)(3)(C)-(D)

Page 475 of 475 ends

Upland City CouncilOctober 13, 2025

Upland City Council
October 13, 2025