Vallejo City Council
October 13, 2026

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FY 26-27 BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING AN APPROPRIATION OF UP TO $375,000 OF MEASURE P FUNDS TO FUND CAPITOL ADVOCACY PARTNERS, LLC FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 AND 2027/2028 FOR THE VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT (STEP 2 OF 2)

Following that presentation on September 22, 2026, the City Council provided Notice of Intent to amend the FY 26/27 Budget for funding of the Capitol Advocacy Partners (CAP) contract for up to $375,000 using Measure P funds for Fiscal Years 2026/2027 and 2027/2028.

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this recommendation will result in a cost-neutral restructuring of funding lines by shifting the non-grant contract balance from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) to Measure P allocations. Measure P will absorb grant administrative overhead expenditures that exceed the strict

0.5% statutory cap governing SLESF.

The total fiscal impact is an appropriation of up to $375,000 from existing, eligible Measure P public safety revenues to cover the remaining two-year contract obligation through its 2028 expiration deadline.

This administrative adjustment does not require General Fund appropriations and successfully preserves a vital legislative and grant acquisition pipeline that has already returned over $11,500,000 in external funding to the City.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378.

ATTACHMENTS

1. CC Resolution CAP 2026 - CAO Stamp

2. 26PD095 CAPITOL ADVOCACY PARTNERS Consultant and Professional Services Agreement

3. 26PD095 CAPITOL ADVOCACY PARTNERS First Amendment

CONTACT
Jason Ta, Chief of Police
(707) 648-4540
[email protected]

RESOLUTION NO. 26-XXXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO AMENDING THE FY 26/27 BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE $375,000 FROM MEASURE P FUNDS FOR THE

CONSULTANT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAPITOL ADVOCACY PARTNERS, LLC THROUGH THE 2028 EXPIRATION DEADLINE WHEREAS, Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC ("CAP") provides vital legislative representation, grant acquisition, and comprehensive grant management services to the City of Vallejo under City Contract #26PD095; and
WHEREAS, CAP has successfully served as an economic force multiplier for Vallejo, securing $11,560,923 in competitive external grant funding to completely capitalize the City’s frontline violent crime intervention systems, emergency mobile mental health response models, gunshot detection networks, and critical tactical command infrastructure; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 2026, the Measure P Oversight Committee reviewed this item and voted four-to-two (4–2) to recommend that allocating funding to preserve this highly successful grant acquisition pipeline directly supports the frontline safety, stabilization, and strategic public safety infrastructure of the Vallejo community; and
WHEREAS, an allocation of up to $375,000 from eligible Measure P public safety revenues is necessary to cover the non-grant management and legislative lobbying portions of the contract through its 2028 expiration deadline, providing an administrative bridge that ensures the uninterrupted pursuit of future federal and state public safety awards; and WHEREAS, the City Council did on September 22, provide Notice of Intent to Amend the FY 26/27 Budget by to appropriate $375,000.00 from Measure P funds to sustain the non-grant management services provided under City Contract #26PD095 with Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC through the 2028 expiration deadline.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Vallejo hereby amends the FY 2026/2027 Budget to appropriate $375,000.00 from Measure P funds to City Contract #26PD095 with Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC through the 2028 expiration deadline.

Adopted by the City Council of the City of Vallejo at a meeting held on October 13, 2026, with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ANDREA SORCE, MAYOR

ATTEST:

DAWN G. ABRAHAMSON, CITY CLERK

$XJ
30
‘–”ƒ
–ƒ†‘—–‹‰ ‘”
Date Originated:
‹ƒ
‡‡’ƒ”–‡– · ͙͙͙ƒ–ƒŽƒ”ƒ–”‡‡– · ƒŽŽ‡Œ‘ ·  · ͙͔͘͝͝ · ͔͛͛Ǥ͚͘͜Ǥ͙͖͘͝ Department:3ROLFH'HSDUWPHQW
Staff Contact: &ODXGLD:LOOLDPVFODXGLDZLOOLDPV#FLW\RIYDOOHMRQHW Contract Type: 3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV$JUHHPHQW
Vendor: &DSLWRO$GYRFDF\3DUWQHUV Vendor Number: Contract Not to Exceed Amount:
Contract Start Date: -XO End Date: -XQ Option to Extend: 2QH\HDURUOHVVFRQWUDFWQRWWRH[FHHGILYH\HDUV Authority to Contract: &LW\&RXQFLO Date to Council: $XJ Attachments are uploaded for review here: https://bit.ly/vContracts $SSURYHG3UH5HTXLVLWLRQ)RUP
,QVXUDQFH
,KDYHXSORDGHGDGGLWLRQDOILOHV1R
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))

͖͚͔͙͝

‘–”ƒ
–ƒ†‘—–‹‰ ‘”
6LJQDWXUH3DJH
Department Initial Date Comment
Originating Department/Division
Risk Manager
City Attorney's Office
Department Head
Finance Department
City Manager
City Clerk
Return executed contract to: &ODXGLD:LOOLDPV
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))










$XJ
30

”‡Ǧ‡“—‹•‹–‹‘ ‘”
‹ƒ
‡‡’ƒ”–‡– · ͙͙͙ƒ–ƒŽƒ”ƒ–”‡‡– · ƒŽŽ‡Œ‘ ·  · ͙͔͘͝͝ · ͔͛͛Ǥ͚͘͜Ǥ͙͖͘͝ Department:3ROLFH'HSDUWPHQW
Staff Contact: &ODXGLD:LOOLDPVFODXGLDZLOOLDPV#FLW\RIYDOOHMRQHW Vendor: &DSLWRO$GYRFDF\3DUWQHUV Vendor Number Term:0XOWL\HDU7HUP
Anticipated Start Date: -XO
Anticipated End Date: -XQ
Anticipated Contract Type: 3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV$JUHHPHQW Purchasing Authority: &LW\&RXQFLO Anticipated Date to Council: $XJ Total Projected Expenditure: 
Multiple Project Numbers?™‘Multiple Account Numbers?Š”‡‡ First Project Number: *3'First Account Number: Second Project Number:
*3'Second Account Number: Third Account Number:  Description of Proposed Purchase:
*UDQWFRQVXOWLQJDSSOLFDWLRQDQGPDQDJHPHQWVHUYLFHV3URMHFWQXPEHUVDFFRXQWQXPEHUVDQGDPRXQWV PD\YDU\WKURXJKRXWWKHFRQWUDFWWHUPGXHWRFKDQJHVLQWKHVHUYLFHVSURYLGHG I have reviewed the city-wide contracts, expenditure and encumbrance reports to comply with the VMC. ,WLVDQH[LVWLQJYHQGRUDQG,DPZRUNLQJWRWDNHDQDFWLRQWRWKH&LW\&RXQFLOEHFDXVHLWZLOOH[FHHGWKH&LW\ ZLGHFDSRILQDVLQJOH)<
Competitive Process: ,DPH[HPSWIURPKDYLQJWRFRPSOHWHD&RPSHWLWLYH3URFHVV Exemption Explanationǣ


$


/HJDORUSURIHVVLRQDOVHUYLFHVWKDWDUHKLJKO\VSHFLDOL]HG Explanation for Vendor Selection:
6SHFLDOL]HGYHQGRUIRUJUDQWFRQVXOWLQJZULWWHQLQWRVRPHJUDQWVDQGKDVEHHQZRUNLQJZLWK93'IRUVHYHUDO \HDUV
Uploaded documents available for review https://bit.ly/vPreReqs. :DUUDQW\1R
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


3UH5HTXLVLWLRQ6LJQDWXUH6HFWLRQ
Department Comment
Supervisor/Manager:-DVRQ7D
Title:&KLHIRI3ROLFH
E-mail:MDVRQWD#FLW\RIYDOOHMRQHW
B B
6LJQDWXUH'DWH Delegated Signee:$QGUHZ0XUUD\
Title:&LW\0DQDJHU
E-mail:DQGUHZPXUUD\#FLW\RIYDOOHMRQHW
B 6LJQDWXUH'DWH Route Final HTE PO to City Clerk for Contract Log
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))




Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 1 of 10 Approved as to form:

By: for
Veronica Nebb, City Attorney

CONSULTANT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made at Vallejo, California, dated for reference this 6th day of August, 2025, by and between the City of Vallejo, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (“Consultant”), who mutually agree as follows:

1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall provide the City professional services as specified in Exhibit A, entitled “Scope of Work.”

2. Payment. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this agreement at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, entitled “Compensation.” The payments specified in Exhibit B shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.

3. Facilities and Equipment. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement.

4. Indemnification. Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend City, its officers, officials, directors, employees, agents, volunteers and affiliates and each of them from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, damages, costs, expenses, actual attorney’s fees, consultant’s fees, expert fees, losses or liability, in law or in equity, of every kind and nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s operations, or any subcontractor’s operations, to be performed under this agreement for Consultant’s or subcontractor’s tort negligence including active or passive, or strict negligence, including but not limited to personal injury including, but not limited to bodily injury, emotional injury, sickness or disease, or death to persons and/or damage to property of anyone, including loss of use thereof, caused or alleged to be caused by any act or omission of Consultant, or any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for the full period of time allowed by the law, regardless to any limitation by insurance, with the exception of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant shall also indemnify, hold harmless, and defend City, its officers, officials, directors, employees, agents, volunteers and affiliates and each of them from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, damages, costs, expenses, actual attorney’s fees, consultant’s fees, expert fees, losses or liability, in law or in equity, of every kind and nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s operations, or any 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 2 of 10 subcontractor’s operations, related to costs or benefits associated with California Public Employment Retirement System (CalPERS) membership where Consultant supplies a CalPERS member who CalPERS determines is subject to enrollment.

The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

5. Insurance Requirements. Consultant agrees to comply with all of the Insurance Requirements set forth in Exhibit C, entitled “Insurance Requirements for Consultant.” Failure to maintain required insurance at all times shall constitute a default and material breach.

6. Accident Reports. Consultant shall immediately report (as soon as feasible, but not more than 24 hours) to the City Risk Manager any accident or other occurrence causing injury to persons or property during the performance of this Agreement. The report shall be made in writing and shall include, at a minimum: (a) the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the persons involved, (b) the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any known witnesses, (c) the date, time, and description of the accident or other occurrence.

7. Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and represents that to the best of its knowledge, there exists no actual or potential conflict between Consultant’s family, business, real property or financial interests and the services to be provided under this Agreement. Consultant shall comply with the City of Vallejo Conflict of Interest Code and not enter into any contract or agreement during the performance of this Agreement which will create a conflict of interest with its duties to City under this Agreement. In the event of a change in Consultant’s family, business, real property, or financial interests occurs during the term of this Agreement that creates an actual or potential conflict of interest, then Consultant shall disclose such conflict in writing to City. Every individual who performs services on behalf of Consultant pursuant to this Agreement must file a full Statement of Economic Interests (also known as Form 700) with the City Clerk if the work of the individual involves making a governmental decision whether to issue, deny, suspend, or revoke any permit, license, application, certificate, approval, order, or similar authorization or entitlement; authorizes the City to enter into, modify, or renew a contract; grants City approval of specifications for a contract; adopts or approves for the City any policy, standard or guideline; lobbies on behalf of the City, or performs the same or substantially all the same duties for the City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in the City’s Conflict of Interest Code.

8. Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor. Neither Consultant nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors, if any, is an employee of City by virtue of this Agreement or performance of any services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant’s services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services pursuant to this Agreement.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 3 of 10

9. Licenses, Permits, Etc. Consultant represents and warrants to City that all consultant services shall be provided by a person or persons duly licensed by the State of California to provide the type of services to be performed under this Agreement and that Consultant has all the permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

10. Business License. Consultant, and its subcontractors, has obtained or agrees to apply prior to performing any services under this Agreement to City’s Finance Department for a business license, pay the applicable business license tax and maintain said business license during the term of this Agreement. The failure to obtain such license shall be a material breach of this Agreement and grounds for termination by City. No payments shall be made to Consultant until such business license(s) has been obtained.

11. Standard of Performance. Consultant shall provide products and perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by a member of Consultant’s profession currently practicing in California.

Consultant is responsible for making an independent evaluation and judgment of all conditions affecting performance of the work, including without limitation applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and all other contingencies or considerations.

Consultant’s responsibilities under this section shall not be delegated. Consultant shall be responsible to City for acts, errors, or omissions of Consultant’s subcontractors.

Consultant is responsible for making an independent evaluation and judgment of all conditions affecting performance of the work and shall prepare plans, reports, and/or other work products in such a way that additional costs will not be incurred beyond a project budget approved or amended by the City Manager or his or her designee.

Whenever the scope of work requires or permits review, approval, conditional approval or disapproval by City, it is understood that such review, approval, conditional approval or disapproval is solely for the purposes of administering this Agreement and determining whether the Consultant is entitled to payment for such work, and not be construed as a waiver of any breach or acceptance by the City of any responsibility, professional or otherwise, for the work, and shall not relieve the Consultant of responsibility for complying with the standard of performance or laws, regulations, industry standards, or from liability for damages caused by negligent acts, errors, omissions, noncompliance with industry standards, or the willful misconduct of Consultant.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 4 of 10

12. Force Majeure. Neither party shall be considered in default of this Agreement to the extent performances are prevented or delayed by causes or circumstances beyond either party’s reasonable control, such as war, riots, strikes, lockouts, work slowdown or stoppage, acts of God, such as floods or earthquakes, and electrical blackouts or brownouts.

In the event that the Consultant is unable to meet the completion date or schedule of services, Consultant shall immediately inform the City Representative of this in writing. If additional time is required to perform the work, the City Representative may adjust the schedule.

13. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Any reference to days means calendar days, unless otherwise specifically stated.

14. Personnel. Consultant agrees to assign only competent personnel according to the reasonable and customary standards of training and experience in the relevant field to perform services under this Agreement. Failure to assign such competent personnel shall constitute grounds for termination of this Agreement.

The payment made to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be the full and complete compensation to which Consultant and Consultant’s officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors are entitled for performance of any work under this Agreement. Neither Consultant nor Consultant’s officers or employees are entitled to any salary or wages, or retirement, health, leave or other fringe benefits applicable to employees of the City. The City will not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of Consultant. The City shall not be required to pay any workers’ compensation insurance on behalf of Consultant.

Consultant shall pay, when and as due, any and all taxes incurred as a result of Consultant’s compensation hereunder, including estimated taxes, and shall provide City with proof of such payments upon request.

15. General Prohibition on Assignment of CalPERS Members and Annuitants.

Consultant shall not hire, employ, or use, as an employee, subcontractor or agent of Consultant (Assigned Individual) any California Public Employment Retirement System (CalPERS) member or annuitant in connection with the provision of services under this Agreement. Nor shall Consultant allow any of its subcontractors, agents, or other representatives to employ CalPERS members or annuitants for the purpose of performing work under this Agreement. Failure to comply with the provisions of this section shall constitute a material breach of Consultant’s obligations under this Agreement and shall be grounds for termination.

The City Manager and the Human Resources Director may together approve an exception which they determine either: (i) meets the requirements of CalPERS relating to Independent Contractors; or (ii) where such Assigned Individual who is an Annuitant, has not, and will not, exceed 960 total hours in a fiscal year (July 1 to June 30) for all CalPERS 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 5 of 10 employers combined, and satisfies all other CalPERS annuitant requirements. No Assigned Individual, regardless of CalPERS membership at the time the labor is provided, may exceed 1,000 hours in a fiscal year (July 1 to June 30).

16. Consultant Not Agent. Except as authorized under this Agreement or as City may authorize in a letter of authorization signed by the City Manager or his or her designee, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, under this Agreement, to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.

17. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2025 and shall continue in full force and effect until June 30, 2028.

City shall, at its discretion, have the right to extend the term of this Agreement, in intervals of one year or less, by written notice to Consultant. The total duration of this Agreement, including the exercise of any options under this section, shall not exceed five years.

If the term of this Agreement extends into fiscal years subsequent to that in which it is approved, such continuation of the Agreement is contingent on the appropriation of funds for such purpose by the City Council of the City of Vallejo. If funds to effect such continued payment are not appropriated, Consultant agrees to terminate any services supplied to City of Vallejo under this Agreement, and relieve City of any further obligation therefore.

18. Termination or Abandonment by City. The City has the right, at any time and in its sole discretion, to immediately terminate or abandon any portion or all of the services to be provided under this Agreement by giving notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of a notice of termination, Consultant shall perform no further work except as specified in the notice. Before the date of termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all City records and documents, all work product, whether completed or not, as of the date of termination and not otherwise previously delivered.

The City shall pay Consultant for services performed in accordance with this Agreement before the date of termination. If this contract provides for payment of a lump sum for all services or by task and termination occurs before completion of the work or any defined task which according to the performance schedule was commenced before the notice of termination, the fee for services performed shall be based on an amount mutually agreed to by City and Consultant for the portion of work completed in conformance with this Agreement before the date of termination. In addition, the City will reimburse Consultant for authorized expenses incurred and not previously reimbursed. The City shall not be liable for any fees or costs associated for the termination or abandonment except for the fees, and reimbursement of authorized expenses, payable pursuant to this section.

19. Products of Consulting Services. The work product, including without limitation, all writings, work sheets, reports, recordings, drawings, files, detailed calculations and other work products, whether complete or incomplete, of Consultant resulting from services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, shall become the property of City. 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 6 of 10 Consultant agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work under this Agreement shall be vested in the City and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual property rights in favor of the City. City acknowledges that its use of the work product is limited to the purposes contemplated by the scope of work and that the Consultant makes no representation of the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the scope of work.

Documents submitted to the City in electronic format shall be formatted according to specifications provided by the City, or if not otherwise specified, in Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint or other Microsoft Office Suite (2002) format as appropriate for the particular work product or, if directed by the City Representative in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.

20. Cooperation by City. City shall, to the extent reasonable and practicable, assist and cooperate with Consultant in the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder.

21. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract, assign or transfer voluntarily or involuntarily any of its rights, duties or obligation under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City Manager or his or her designee in each instance. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right, duty or obligation under this Agreement without said consent shall be void and of no effect.

If subcontracting of work is permitted, Consultant shall pay its subcontractor within ten (10) days of receipt of payment by City for work performed by a subcontractor and billed by the Consultant. Use of the term subcontractor in any other provision of this contract shall not be construed to imply authorization for Consultant to use subcontractors for performance of any service under this Agreement.

The City is an intended beneficiary of any work performed by Consultant’s subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and City.

Any subcontractor or assignee consented to by City shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this agreement and the same shall be incorporated into and made a part of any assignment or subcontractor agreement.

22. Successors and Assigns. All terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement shall apply to and bind the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. Nothing in this section is intended to affect the limitation on assignment.

23. Non-Discrimination/Fair Employment Practices.
(a) Consultant shall not, because of race, religious creed, color, sex, national original, ancestry, disability, medical condition, age, marital status or sexual orientation of any person, refuse to hire or employ, or to bar or discharge from employment, or to discriminate in compensation, or in terms, conditions or privileges any person, and every employee will receive equal opportunity for employment and shall be granted equal 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 7 of 10 treatment with respect to compensation, terms, conditions or other privileges of employment, without regard to his race, religious creed, color, sex, national origin, ancestry, or disability, medical condition, age, marital status or sexual orientation.

Consultant warrants and represents it is an equal opportunity employer and agrees it shall not discriminate on the basis of race, religious creed, color, sex, national origin, ancestry, disability, medical condition, age, marital status or sexual orientation in the selection and retention of employees, subcontractors or procurement of materials or equipment.

In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by Consultant for work to be performed under any subcontract, including procurement of materials or equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by Consultant of Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement relative to nondiscrimination and fair employment practices.

Consultant shall include the above provisions of this section in every subcontract, including procurement of materials or equipment.
(b) Consultant agrees to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, the California Fair Employment Practices Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, any other applicable federal and state laws and regulations and City ordinances and regulations hereinafter enacted.

24. Notices. All notices or instruments required to be given or delivered by law or this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective upon receipt thereof and shall be by personal service or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to:

If to City:

Awab Manzoor
Acting Administrative Manager
Vallejo Police Department
111 Amador Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
If to Consultant:

Dana DeBeaumont
Partner
Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC
600 Pennsylvania Avenue SE #15408
Washington DC 20003
Any party may change its address for receiving notices by giving written notice of such change to the other party in accordance with this section.

Routine administrative communications shall be made pursuant to section 1 of Exhibit A. 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 8 of 10

24. Integration Clause. This Agreement, including all Exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be amended or modified except by a written agreement executed by each of the parties hereto.

25. Severability Clause. Should any provision of this Agreement ever be deemed to be legally void or unenforceable, all remaining provisions shall survive and be enforceable.

26. Law Governing. This Agreement shall in all respects be governed by the law of the State of California without regard to its conflicts of law rules. Litigation arising out of or connected with this Agreement shall be instituted and maintained in the courts of Solano County in the State of California or in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Sacramento, California, and the parties consent to jurisdiction over their person and over the subject matter of any such litigation in such courts, and consent to service of process issued by such courts.

27. Waiver. Waiver by either party of any default, breach or condition precedent shall not be construed as a waiver of any other default, breach or condition precedent or any other right hereunder.

28. Ambiguity. The parties acknowledge that this is a negotiated agreement, that they have had the opportunity to have this Agreement reviewed by their respective legal counsel, and that the terms and conditions of this Agreement are not to be construed against any party on the basis of such party’s draftsmanship thereof.

29. Gender. All pronouns and any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to the masculine, feminine, neuter, singular or plural, as the identifications of the person or persons, firm or firms, corporation or corporations may require.

30. Headings. The section headings contained in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

31. Compliance with Laws. Consultant will comply with all statutes, regulations and ordinances in the performance of all services under this Agreement.

32. Confidentiality of City Information. During the performance of services under this Agreement, Consultant may gain access to and use City information regarding, but not limited to, procedures, policies, training, operational practices, and other vital information (hereafter collectively referred to as “City Information”) which are valuable, special and unique assets of the City. Consultant agrees that it will not use any information obtained as a consequence of the performance of services under this Agreement for any purpose other than fulfillment of Consultant’s scope of work , to protect all City Information and treat it as strictly confidential and proprietary to City, and that it 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 9 of 10 will not at any time, either directly or indirectly, divulge, disclose or communicate in any manner any City Information to any third party, other than its own employees, agents or subcontractors who have a need for the City Information for the performance of services under this Agreement, without the prior written consent of City, or as required by law.

Consultant shall treat all records and work product prepared or maintained by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement as confidential.

A violation by Consultant of this section shall be a material violation of this Agreement and will justify legal and/or equitable relief.

Consultant’s obligations under this section shall survive the completion of services, expiration or termination of this Agreement.

33. News and Information Release. Consultant agrees that it will not issue any news releases in connection with either the award of this Agreement, or any subsequent amendment of or efforts under this Agreement, without first obtaining review and approval of said news releases from City through the City Representative.

34. City Representative. The City Representative specified in Exhibit A, or the representative’s designee, shall administer this Agreement for the City.

35. Counterparts. The parties may execute this Agreement in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed one and the same instrument.

36. Facsimile Signature; Electronic Signature. This Agreement shall be binding upon the receipt of facsimile signatures or e-mailed by PDF or otherwise. Any person transmitting his or her signature by facsimile or electronically shall promptly send an original signature to the other party pursuant to the notice provision of this Agreement.

The failure to send an original shall not affect the binding nature of this Agreement.

37. Authority. The person signing this Agreement for Consultant hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of Consultant.

38. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:

Exhibit A, entitled “Scope of Work,” including any attachments Exhibit B, entitled “Compensation,” including any attachments Exhibit C, entitled “Insurance Requirements,” including attachments [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 10 of 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year shown below the name of each of the parties.

CAPITOL ADVOCACY PARTNERS, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company
By: ____________________
Dana DeBeaumont
Partner
DATE: __________________
(City Seal)

CITY OF VALLEJO,
a California municipal corporation
By: ____________________
Andrew Murray
City Manager
DATE: __________________
ATTEST:

By: ____________________
Dawn G. Abrahamson
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ____________________ for
Veronica A. F. Nebb
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:

By: ____________________
Armond Sarkis
Risk Manager
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))

 

Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 1 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK

1. Representatives. The City Representative for this Agreement is:

Awab Manzoor
Acting Administrative Manager
Vallejo Police Department
111 Amador Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
[email protected]
The Consultant’s Representative for this Agreement is:

Dana DeBeaumont
Partner
Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC
600 Pennsylvania Avenue SE #15408
Washington DC 20003
(202) 546-0561
[email protected]
All routine administrative communications between the parties will be between the abovenamed representatives and may be by personal delivery, mail, facsimile transmission, or electronic mail as agreed between the Consultant Representative and City’s Representative.

2. Services to be Provided. The services provided shall be as set forth in Attachment 1 of Exhibit A, below, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

3. Time for Performance. Consultant will perform the services according to the schedule below. If the schedule calls for the services to be performed in phases or discrete increments, Consultant shall not proceed from one phase or increment to the next without written authorization from the City’s Representative. Consultant will complete all services by June 30, 2028.

4. No Set Work Hours. Consultant shall be solely responsible for determining the working hours of its individual personnel, employees, agents, and representatives within the limitations otherwise provided in this Agreement.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 2 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work
ATTACHMENT 1 to EXHIBIT A:

WORK, SERVICES, AND PRICING
The Consultant will provide Work and Services on behalf of the Client during the term of this Agreement as described below:

SECTION 1: CLIENT ADVOCACY SERVICES.

The consultant will provide advocacy services on behalf of the client to include the following work:

A. Developing agendas on behalf of the client to support law enforcement funding priorities. Topic areas may include (but are not limited to) gun violence, traumainformed response, behavior health, diversion services, homelessness, social services, and other public safety components.

B. Developing a Community Project on behalf of the client annually (when solicited by Congress) involving appropriations legislation for member/senator (elected official) submission. Community Project development work will include researching and writing an initial community project application, with submission to elected officials and supporting ongoing advocacy efforts of the official and Appropriations Committee review and process.

C. Providing legislative bill tracking and advocacy work on behalf of the client to support municipal and/or organizational funding priorities. Advocacy work on behalf of the client will include planning, scheduling, and completing trips to meet and speak with federal elected officials, agency officials, staff, and other parties, including in-person meetings in Washington, D.C. and/or virtual meetings. Advocacy work on behalf of the client may include outreach to state, regional, and/or local officials/staff.

D. Providing appropriate materials for public dissemination on behalf of the client to support advocacy work, including materials for meetings, elected officials, agency officials, and other parties, writing testimony for use by the client, and maintaining records of meetings and distributed materials for client reference.

E. Providing weekly briefings and updates (by e-mail and/or virtual meetings) to client leadership concerning federal activities such as executive and legislative actions, progression of legislation, agency actions, and identified government funding opportunities, with certain state, local and/or foundation engagement as discovered by the consultant.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 3 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work
F. Quarterly on-site visits by consultant officials to client business offices or other requested locations to meet with client leadership, support client advocacy work, or support other client activity.

G. Consultant pricing of Client Advocacy Services shall follow the pricing schedule described herein.

SECTION 2: GRANT WRITING SERVICES.

The consultant will provide grant writing services on behalf of the client to include the following work:

A. Conducting grant program and/or funding project opportunity research on behalf of the client to support client funding priorities. Consultant research will include review of federal, with certain state, not-for-profit, and private foundation grant and/or project opportunities, as provided by Client.

B. Providing grant program and/or funding project participation recommendations (by email and/or virtual meetings) to client leadership and officials. Consultant recommendations will include a brief written summary of each program and/or project containing client participation requirements, award and/or funding assessment, and other details specific to the program and/or project.

C. Conducting preliminary analysis of selected grant programs and/or funding projects for client leadership review. Consultant analysis will include a written summary of the selected grant and/or project containing a scope-of-work assessment, a list of client participation requirements, identified deadlines and submission dates, estimated consultant pricing, and other details specific to the program and/or project.

D. Writing and submitting selected grant program and/or funding project applications on behalf of the client. Consultant work and services will include each of the following:

1. Completing a finalized and detailed application written scope-of-work describing required information and data (including client produced materials), timeline for writing and submission (including essential completion dates), and other items specific to a grant program and/or project application. The finalized scope-of-work will include a consultant pricing schedule for approval by client leadership. The additional Consultant fees are based on narrative length and scope. The base fee includes the preparation of up to 20 pages of required or recommended attachments that involve narrative content, research, or new scope development.

Applications with more than 20 pages of labor intensive attachments will be billed as if additional narrative pages were included. Expert technical documents such 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 4 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work
as environmental impact statements, strategic plans, or financial audits are excluded from standard scope and must be provided by the client.

2. Creating a grant application workbook for client use detailing required client produced information and data, essential completion dates for application review and submission, and other items specific to a grant program and/or project application. The grant application workbook will serve as the primary reference document for application completion and submission.

3. Identifying a consultant team leader with responsibility for writing, editing, and completing the application. The consultant team leader will be the primary point of contact between client officials and the consultant for purposes of application completion and submission.

4. Participation by a consultant project team in writing, editing, and completing the application with knowledge, skills, and abilities specific to the type of application.

The consultant project team will be responsible for researching and identifying information and data to answer application questions, formulating answers using information and data, and generally supporting the consultant team leader in completing the application.

5. Reviewing and final editing of the application by consultant executive leadership with expert level knowledge of grant and funding project application submission.

Consultant executive leadership will be responsible for finalizing the draft application for submission to client leadership and/or officials.

6. Submitting the draft application to client officials for review, editing, and approval.

Consultant executive leadership will review the draft application with client leadership and/or officials. Client leadership and/or officials will be responsible for approving the application to be submitted by the consultant. At the start of each application process, the consultant and the client will identify at least one milestone deadline by which key information and materials must be provided. If the required materials are not provided by the agreed milestone, the consultant may recommend forgoing application submission.

7. Submitting the application (with required supporting documents) by the consultant according to grant program and/or funding project application submission requirements and by submission deadlines. The consultant team leader will be responsible for notifying client officials by e-mail confirming application submission.

8. Tracking and follow-up of the application by the consultant and communication with grant program and/or funding project officials concerning application status. 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 5 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work
The consultant team leader, in consultation with executive leadership, will be responsible for answering application questions (if asked). The consultant team leader will be responsible for notifying client officials by phone and e-mail concerning application status.

E. Upon award, Consultant will conduct a comprehensive grant briefing to key client staff that outlines the grant focus and deliverables, with detailed information of grant timeline and requirements for the grant’s first year. Additional grant management services are available as outlined in Section 3.

F. Consultant pricing of Grant Writing Services shall follow the pricing schedule described herein.

SECTION 3: GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES.

The consultant will provide grant management services on behalf of the client (for grant program and/or funding project applications submitted by the consultant) for to include the following work:

A. Conducting preliminary analysis of the grant program and/or funding project to be managed for client leadership review. Consultant analysis will include a written summary of the grant and/or project to be managed including a scope-of-work assessment, a list of client responsibilities and requirements, identified deadlines and submission dates, estimated consultant pricing, and other details specific to the program and/or project to be managed.

1. Preliminary analysis of the program and/or project to be managed may be completed by the consultant as part of an application process or completed postaward depending on program and/or project requirements and/or client leadership preference.

2. Under mutual agreement by the consultant and the client, project-specific grant management services may be retained for individual grants as needed, depending on the nature of the grant-funded project.

B. Developing a grant program and/or funding project management plan on behalf of the client. Consultant work and services will include each of the following:

1. Completing a finalized and detailed project management scope-of-work describing client responsibilities, client produced project information and data, project budget, essential completion dates, consultant produced materials, and other items specific to program and/or project management. The finalized scope-of-work will include a consultant pricing schedule for approval by client leadership. 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 6 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work

2. Identifying client officials with project management responsibilities. Client officials will be responsible for day-to-day operating activities, reporting activities, processing expenditures, securing agreements with sub-contractors and/or other parties, and working closely with the consultant team leader to assure timely completion of objectives.

3. Identifying a consultant team leader with primary responsibility for client communications. The consultant team leader will be responsible for coordinating activities, reviewing client documents, monitoring timely completion of objectives, and/or other work supporting project management activities.

4. Determining and listing client produced documents including (but not limited to):
personnel and expense schedules; purchasing and disbursement schedules; client attestation and/or certification documents; invoices and receipts, and/or other documents specific to program and/or project management requirements for creating an auditable record of client activity.

5. Determining and listing other client services including (but not limited to): client access to program and/or project management portals; budget modifications; protocols for purchasing, accounting of expenditures, and reporting; identifying evaluators; creating memorandums of understanding (MOUs) to support operating activities; training of client officials, and/or other services supporting project management activities.

6. Presenting a work plan to client leadership for review and approval. The project management work plan will serve as the primary reference document for completing program and/or funding project management activities.

C. Completing grant program and/or funding project management on behalf of the client.

Consultant work and services will include each of the following:

1. Conducting initial project management overview meeting with client officials for identifying award conditions and/or requirements, acceptance of award, expected client work, roles and responsibilities, work completion timelines, project management deadlines (dates), other services provided by the consultant to support project management, and/or other work to be completed by the client and consultant for supporting project management (following the work plan). This may include assisting with the resolution of award conditions, revisions to budget documents or timelines, partner letters, or other adjustments related to the transition from award to implementation.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 7 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work

2. Reviewing documents produced by client officials detailing operating activities.

Client officials will be responsible for producing documents in a timely fashion as described by the work plan. The consultant team leader will review documents for suitability and compliance. Documents lacking suitability or compliance for creating an auditable record of operating activity will be identified by the consultant team leader with notification to client officials. The consultant team leader will assist client officials in understanding and improving document suitability and compliance prior to submission.

3. Assisting client officials in submitting approved documents detailing operating activities. The consultant team leader will assist client officials in submitting documents required by the grant program and/or funding project. The consultant team leader will meet with client officials weekly to track and report progress, identify deficiencies, correct deficiencies, and complete other work described by the work plan.

4. Assisting client officials in producing and submitting financial, effort, and performance reports. The consultant team leader will assist client officials in creating reports required by the grant program and/or funding project. The consultant team leader will review client documents, create draft reports, and communicate draft reports to client officials for approval. The consultant team leader will assist client officials in submitting reports as described by the work plan.

The Consultant may also advise on and review formal communications with the granting agency, such as progress reports, budget adjustments, or compliance responses.

5. Modifying the scope of work and work plan. The consultant team leader will assist client officials in modifying the scope of work and work plan for changes in client personnel, key personnel salary allocations over allowable thresholds, changes in locations, changes in sub-contractors, and revisions of the budget over allowable threshold. Proposed modifications to the scope of work and work plan will be reviewed by consultant executive leadership and communicated to client leadership for approval. Approved modifications will be incorporated into a revised work plan.

6. Communicating with client leadership and client officials. Consultant executive leadership and the consultant team leader will regularly communicate with the client concerning grant program and/or funding project management. Consultant executive leadership will assist the client with facilitating relationships between the client, partners, and stakeholders, followed by handing off day-to-day communications to client officials. The consultant team leader will maintain continuous communications with client officials for completing the work plan. 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 8 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work

7. Monitoring grant program and/or funding project requirements and progress of the work plan. Consultant executive leadership and the consultant team leader will monitor project requirements and work plan progress, including finances, effort, and performance. Consultant executive leadership will inform client leadership if threats to progress are identified. Consultant executive leadership will facilitate and address programmatic and/or financial issues that may arise during the program and/or project. The Consultant team leader will regularly update client officials concerning work plan progress. Consultant support may include helping resolve problems with disbursement delays or agency monitoring findings.

8. Assisting client officials in producing and submitting close-out reports, reconciliations, and/or other materials required by the grant program and/or funding project. The consultant team leader will review client documents, create draft reports, and communicate draft reports to client officials for approval. The consultant team leader will assist client officials in submitting reports and/or other materials as described by the work plan.

D. Consultant pricing of Grant Management Services shall follow the pricing schedule described herein.

SECTION 4: OTHER WORK AND SERVICES.

The consultant may provide other work on behalf of the client (if requested) as follows:

A. Other work provided by the consultant on behalf of the client may be completed according to terms and conditions not implied or suggested by this contract.

B. Other work provided by the consultant on behalf of the client shall be described by a mutually agreed scope-of-work detailing activity and deliverables. The finalized scopeof-work will include a consultant pricing schedule for approval by client leadership.

C. Other work provided by the consultant on behalf of the client shall be finalized by a separate written addendum to this contract, according to mutually agreed terms and conditions (if considered and approved by both parties).

'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 9 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work

PRICING SCHEDULES
Work and Services offered to the Client by the Consultant during the base year(s) of this Agreement shall be priced using the following schedules. Work and Services provided to the Client by the Consultant during the term, and subsequent option year(s) of this Agreement, shall be subject to a 3.5% per annum pricing increase.

SCHEDULE 1A: BASE CLIENT ADVOCACY SERVICES
Item Item Description Price
1A.1 Written agendas supporting client funding priorities (as requested and/or needed).

Included
1A.2 Development of Community Projects to support client funding in annual appropriations legislation (one (1) per year of contractual term).

Included
1A.3 Legislative bill tracking and advocacy work to support client funding priorities (as requested and/or needed).

Included
1A.4 Materials for public dissemination to support client advocacy work and written testimony for public meetings (as requested and/or needed).

Included
1A.5 Weekly briefings and updates concerning federal activities and opportunities to support client funding priorities (as discovered by the consultant).

Included
1A.6 On-site visit to client business offices or other requested locations (one (1) full day visit)
Included
BASE PRICING:
(billed monthly)
$5,445.33
(per month)
SCHEDULE 1B: OPTIONAL CLIENT ADVOCACY SERVICES
Item Item Description Price
1B.1 Development of non-competitive application to the designated agency, should a Community Project be included in enacted legislation. $5,000 each
(flat fee)
SCHEDULE 2A: ADDITIONAL GRANT WRITING SERVICES
Item Item Description (Preliminary Application Work) Price 2A.1 Grant program and/or funding project opportunity research. Included 2A.2 Grant program and/or funding project recommendations. Included 2A.3 Preliminary analysis of selected grant programs and/or funding projects for client leadership review.

Included
Item Item Description (Application Work) Price
2A.4 Finalized and detailed grant program and/or funding project written scope-of-work for client leadership approval.

Included
2A.5 Application workbook detailing client produced information and data, essential completion dates for review and submission, and other items Included
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 10 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work
specific to an application.
2A.6 Writing, editing, and completion of an application by a consultant team leader and project team.

Included
2A.7 Review and final editing of an application by consultant executive leadership.

Included
2A.8 Submission of a draft application to client officials for review, editing, and approval.

Included
2A.9 Submission of a final application (with required supporting documents) by the consultant according to application requirements and deadlines.

Included
2A.10 Tracking and follow-up of an application by the consultant. Included 2A.11 Upon award, conduct a comprehensive grant briefing to key client staff that outlines the grant focus and deliverables, with detailed information of grant timeline and requirements for the grant’s first year.

Included
BASE PRICING:
(flat fee, based on application narrative length,
billed upon final application submission)
1 to 9 pages double-spaced:
10 to 19 pages double-spaced:
20 to 26 pages double-spaced:
27 to 36 pages double-spaced:
37 to 50 pages double-spaced:
51 or more pages double-spaced:
$7,500
$12,500
$19,500
$25,000
$29,500
Negotiable
SCHEDULE 2B: OPTIONAL GRANT WRITING SERVICES
Item Item Description Price
2B.1 Hourly Grant Writing Fee: Including but not limited to; proof reading and editing of client written applications by a consultant project team and consultant executive leadership, with final draft applications returned to client officials for submission by the client.
$195
(per hour)
2B.2 “Plus-Up” services (with identified character limits) for client written applications (if requested).
$1,500
(flat fee)

SCHEDULE 3A: BASE GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Item Item Description (Preliminary Project Work) Price
3A.1 Preliminary analysis of a grant program and/or funding project to be managed by the consultant for client leadership review.

Included
Item Item Description (Project Planning Work) Price
3A.2 Finalized and detailed grant program and/or funding project management plan written scope-of-work for client leadership approval.

Included
3A.3 Determination of client officials with project management responsibilities.

Included
3A.4 Determination and listing of client produced documents and services for Included 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (5-2025) Page 11 of 11 Exhibit A – Scope of Work
creating an auditable record of client activity and project management activities.
3A.5 Presentation of a project management work plan to client leadership for review and approval.

Included
Item Item Description (Project Management Work) Price
3A.6 Completion of a project management overview meeting with client officials to review the work plan.

Included
3A.7 Assisting client officials in reviewing and submitting documents detailing operating activities in work plan.

Included
3A.8 Assisting client officials in producing and submitting financial, effort, and performance reports in work plan.

Included
3A.9 Modification of the project management scope of work and work plan (if requested or required).

Included
3A.10 Communicating with client leadership and client officials and assisting the client with facilitating relationships between project partners and stakeholders as described by work plan.

Included
3A.11 Monitoring project requirements and progress of work plan. Included 3A.12 Assisting client officials in producing and submitting close-out reports, reconciliations, and/or other materials in work plan.

Included
3A.13 Consultant shall provide up to three (3) additional on-site visits per year, one per quarter, excluding the initial included annual advocacy visit, to the client’s business offices or other mutually agreed-upon locations.

Included
BASE PRICING: IN PROGRESS GRANT INCLUSIVE:

Basic Grant Management services for the following projects ONLY: BCJI; JAG funds; COPS CIT; Connect and Protect; FY22, 23, 26 Community Projects. $3,000
(per month)
GRANT FUNDED BASE PRICING:
(per project managed, billed monthly)
Grant Management services for the following projects: CAL VIP 2022 Award, Prop 47 2022 Award
Additional grants may be added at $3,500 each at mutual agreement by parties. $3,000
(per month)
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 1 of 3 Exhibit B - Compensation

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION

1. Consultant’s Compensation.

A. Services: City agrees to pay Consultant, at the rate(s) specified in Attachment 1 of Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference, for the services identified therein and for all authorized reimbursable expenses, for a total not to exceed Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000). Said not to exceed amount shall include an amount to be paid to Consultant for outstanding invoices totaling $43,090 for services rendered during Fiscal Year 2024 – 2025.

Consultant shall notify City in writing no later than thirty (30) days prior to the estimated date when Consultant will have billed City the maximum payment amount permitted under this Agreement, and Consultant shall provide City with an estimate of the additional compensation required to complete the project.

B. Additional Services:

1. Additional Services are those services related to the scope of Services of Consultant as set forth in Exhibit A but not anticipated at the time of execution of this Agreement. Additional Services shall be provided only when a Supplemental Agreement authorizing such Additional Services is approved by the City Manager, or his or her designee. City reserves the right to perform any Additional Services with its own staff or to retain other Consultants to perform said Additional Services.

2. Consultant’s compensation for Additional Services shall be based on the total number of hours spent on Additional Services multiplied by the employees’ appropriate billable hourly rate as established in Attachment 1 of Exhibit A and incorporated herein. City, at its option, may negotiate a fixed fee for some or all Additional Services as the need arises. Where a fixed fee for Additional Services is established by mutual Agreement between City and Consultant, compensation to Consultant shall not exceed the fixed fee amount.

2. Appropriate Billable Hourly Rates for Services and Additional Services.

Consultant’s billable hourly rates are set forth in Attachment 1 of Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.

3. Consultant’s Reimbursable Expenses. Reimbursable Expenses shall be limited to actual reasonable expenditures of Consultant for expenses that are necessary for the proper completion of the Services and shall only be payable if specifically authorized in advance by City.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 2 of 3 Exhibit B - Compensation

4. Payments to Consultant.

A. Payments to Consultant shall be made within a reasonable time after receipt of Consultant’s invoice, said payments to be made in proportion to services performed.

Consultant may request payment on a monthly basis. Consultant shall be responsible for the cost of supplying all documentation necessary to verify the monthly billings to the satisfaction of City.

B. All invoices submitted by Consultant shall contain the following information:

1. Description of services billed under this invoice

2. Date of Invoice Issuance

3. Sequential Invoice Number

4. City’s Purchase Order Number (if issued)

5. Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number

6. Amount of this Invoice (Itemize all Reimbursable Expenses”)

7. Total Billed to Date
C. Items shall be separated into Services and Reimbursable Expenses. Billings that do not conform to the format outlined above shall be returned to Consultant for correction.

City shall not be responsible for delays in payment to Consultant resulting from Consultant’s failure to comply with the invoice format described above.

D. Request for payment shall be sent to:

Claudia Williams
Administrative Analyst II
Vallejo Police Department
111 Amador Street
Vallejo, CA 94590

5. Accounting Records of Consultant. Consultant shall maintain for three (3) years after completion of all services hereunder, all records under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, records of Consultant’s direct salary costs for all Services and Additional Services performed under this Agreement and records of Consultant’s Reimbursable Expenses, in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices. Consultant shall keep such records available for audit, inspection and copying by representatives of the City’s Finance Department or other government agencies during regular business hours upon twenty-four (24) hours’ notice.

The obligations of Consultant under this section shall survive this Agreement.

6. Taxes. Consultant shall pay, when and as due, any and all taxes incurred as a result of Consultant’s compensation hereunder, including estimated taxes, and shall provide City with proof of such payments upon request.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 3 of 3 Exhibit B - Compensation

7. Taxpayer Identification Number. Consultant shall provide City with Consultant’s complete Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification, Form W-9, as issued by the Internal Revenue Service, and any other State or local tax identification number requested by City.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 1 of 3 Exhibit C – Insurance Requirements

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, including any extensions thereto, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of services hereunder by the Consultant, their agents, representatives, or employees or subcontractors.

1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

A. Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).

B. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 any auto and endorsement CA 0025.

C. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance.

D. Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession (Errors and Omission).

2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:

A. General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

B. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

C. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If Consultant is not subject to California Workers’ Compensation requirements, Consultant shall file a completed certificate of exemption form which may be obtained from the City prior to commencing any activity authorized hereunder.

D. Professional Liability (Errors and Omission): $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence, and annual aggregate.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 2 of 3 Exhibit C – Insurance Requirements

3. Deductible and Self-Insured Retention. Any deductibles or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either:
the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City of Vallejo, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

4. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies, as can be provided, are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

A. The City of Vallejo, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects; liability, including defense costs, arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Vallejo, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. The insurance is to be issued by companies licensed to do business in the State of California.

B. For any claims related to this project, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Vallejo, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Vallejo, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

C. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.

D. The Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

E. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.

F. The workers’ compensation and employer’s liability policy required hereunder shall be endorsed to state that the workers’ compensation carrier waives its right of subrogation against City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, which might arise by reason of payment under such policy in connection with Consultant’s performance under this Agreement.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


Consultant and Professional Services Agreement (Revised 05-2025) Page 3 of 3 Exhibit C – Insurance Requirements

5. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII.

6. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting general and automobile liability insurance coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.

7. Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor.

All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

8. Payment Withhold. City will withhold payments to Consultant if the certificates of insurance and endorsements required in Paragraph F, above, are canceled or Consultant otherwise ceases to be insured as required herein.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


California Secretary of State
Business Programs Division
1500 11th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Request Type:

Entity Name:

Entity No.:

Entity Type:

Issuance Date:

Copies Requested:

Receipt No.:

Certified Copies
Capitol Advocacy Partners LLC
10/23/2025
1 DELAWARE
B20250354491
Limited Liability Company - Out of
State
Formed In: 011741284
Certificate No.: 381339534
Document Listing
Reference # Date Filed Filing Description Number of Pages B4111-8833 10/23/2025 Initial Filing 3
** **** ****** ******** End of list ******** ****** **** ** I, SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH.D., California Secretary of State, do hereby certify on the Issuance Date, the attached document(s) referenced above are true and correct copies and were filed in this office on the date(s) indicated above.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute this
certificate and affix the Great Seal of the
State of California on October 23, 2025.

To verify the issuance of this Certificate, use the Certifcate No. above with the Secretary of State Certification Verification Search available at bizfileOnline.sos.ca.gov.

SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH.D.

Secretary of State

'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


6+28/'$1<2)7+($%29('(6&5,%('32/,&,(6%(&$1&(//('%()25( 7+( (;3,5$7,21 '$7( 7+(5(2) 127,&( :,// %( '(/,9(5(' ,1 $&&25'$1&(:,7+7+(32/,&<3529,6,216
,1685(5
6 $))25',1*&29(5$*(
,1685(5)

,1685(5(

,1685(5'

,1685(5&

,1685(5%

,1685(5$

1$,&
1$0(

&217$&7

$&1R

)$;
(0$,/
$''5(66

352'8&(5

$&1R([W

3+21(
,1685('
&29(5$*(6 &(57,),&$7(180%(5
5(9,6,21180%(5

,03257$17
,IWKHFHUWLILFDWHKROGHULVDQ$'',7,21$/,1685('WKHSROLF\ LHV
PXVWKDYH$'',7,21$/,1685('SURYLVLRQVRUEHHQGRUVHG ,I68%52*$7,21,6:$,9('VXEMHFW WR WKH WHUPVDQGFRQGLWLRQVRI WKHSROLF\FHUWDLQSROLFLHVPD\UHTXLUHDQHQGRUVHPHQW$VWDWHPHQWRQ WKLVFHUWLILFDWHGRHVQRWFRQIHUULJKWVWRWKHFHUWLILFDWHKROGHULQOLHXRIVXFKHQGRUVHPHQW V

7+,6 &(57,),&$7( ,6 ,668(' $6 $ 0$77(5 2) ,1)250$7,21 21/< $1' &21)(56 12 5,*+76 8321 7+( &(57,),&$7( +2/'(5 7+,6 &(57,),&$7( '2(6 127 $)),50$7,9(/< 25 1(*$7,9(/< $0(1' (;7(1' 25 $/7(5 7+( &29(5$*( $))25'(' %< 7+( 32/,&,(6 %(/2:  7+,6 &(57,),&$7( 2) ,1685$1&( '2(6 127 &2167,787( $ &2175$&7 %(7:((1 7+( ,668,1* ,1685(5 6  $87+25,=('
5(35(6(17$7,9(25352'8&(5$1'7+(&(57,),&$7(+2/'(5 27+(5

3HUDFFLGHQW

(DDFFLGHQW



1$
68%5
:9'
$''/
,16'
7+,6,672 &(57,)<7+$77+(32/,&,(62),1685$1&( /,67('%(/2:+$9(%((1,668('727+(,1685(' 1$0('$%29()257+(32/,&<3(5,2' ,1',&$7('  127:,7+67$1',1* $1< 5(48,5(0(17 7(50 25 &21',7,212) $1< &2175$&7 25 27+(5 '2&80(17:,7+ 5(63(&7 72:+,&+ 7+,6 &(57,),&$7( 0$< %( ,668(' 25 0$< 3(57$,1 7+( ,1685$1&( $))25'(' %< 7+( 32/,&,(6 '(6&5,%(' +(5(,1 ,6 68%-(&7 72 $// 7+( 7(506 (;&/86,216$1'&21',7,2162)68&+32/,&,(6/,0,766+2:10$<+$9(%((15('8&('%<3$,'&/$,06 


 3523(57<'$0$*(
%2',/<,1-85<
3HUDFFLGHQW

%2',/<,1-85<
3HUSHUVRQ

&20%,1('6,1*/(/,0,7
$872621/<
$872621/< $8726
1212:1('
2:1(' 6&+('8/('
$1<$872
$87202%,/(/,$%,/,7<
<1
:25.(56&203(16$7,21
$1'(03/2<(56
/,$%,/,7<
2)),&(50(0%(5(;&/8'('"

0DQGDWRU\LQ1+

'(6&5,37,212)23(5$7,216EHORZ
,I\HVGHVFULEHXQGHU
$1<35235,(7253$571(5(;(&87,9(



(/',6($6(32/,&</,0,7
(/',6($6(($(03/2<((
(/($&+$&&,'(17
(5
27+ 67$787(3(5

00''<<<<
/,0,76 32/,&<(;3
00''<<<<

32/,&<()) /75 7<3(2),1685$1&( 32/,&<180%(5 ,165
'(6&5,37,212)23(5$7,216/2&$7,2169(+,&/(6
$&25'$GGLWLRQDO5HPDUNV6FKHGXOHPD\EHDWWDFKHGLIPRUHVSDFHLVUHTXLUHG

(;&(66/,$%
80%5(//$/,$% ($&+2&&855(1&( 
$**5(*$7( 

2&&85
&/$,060$'(
'(' 5(7(17,21 
352'8&76&20323$** 
*(1(5$/$**5(*$7( 
3(5621$/ $'9,1-85< 
0('(;3
$Q\RQHSHUVRQ

($&+2&&855(1&( 
'$0$*(725(17('
35(0,6(6
(DRFFXUUHQFH

&200(5&,$/*(1(5$//,$%,/,7<
&/$,060$'( 2&&85
*(1
/$**5(*$7(/,0,7$33/,(63(5

32/,&< 352
-(&7 /2&
&(57,),&$7(2)/,$%,/,7<,1685$1&( '$7(
00''<<<<

&$1&(//$7,21
$87+25,=('5(35(6(17$7,9(
$&25'


‹
$&25'&25325$7,21$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG
&(57,),&$7(+2/'(5
7KH$&25'QDPHDQGORJRDUHUHJLVWHUHGPDUNVRI$&25'
+,5('
$872621/<
&DSLWRO$GYRFDF\3DUWQHUV//&
3HQQV\OYDQLD$YH6(
:DVKLQJWRQ
&LW\RI9DOOHMR
$WWQ
5LVN0DQDJHU6DQWD&ODUD6WUHHW
*HQHUDWHGXVLQJ&HUWLILFLDO
V6PDUW&2,1HWZRUNα7UDFN\RXU6XSSOLHUVLQUHDOWLPHDWFHUWLILFLDOFRPFRL &2,,'
<0<


3DUDGLVR)LQDQFLDODQG,QVXUDQFH6HUYLFHV//&
(0DLQ6WUHHW

6WDIIRUG6SULQJV &7 
*OHQQ7RUUHV3LODSLO-U



JOHQQ#SDUDGLVRLQVXUDQFHFRP
'& 
+DUWIRUG8QGHUZULWHUV,QVXUDQFH&RPSDQ\ 
5DWHE\0XOWLSOH&RPSDQLHV
7KH+DUWIRUG
$&(3URSHUW\DQG&DVXDOW\,QV&R
$ < < 6%0%-71;  






$ < < 6%0%-71;  

% < :(&%-751   


& (PSOR\PHQW3UDFWLFHV/LDELOLW\ .%   /LPLW 
&XVWRPHU,'

7KH&LW\RI9DOOHMRLVDQDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGZLWKUHVSHFWWRWKH*HQHUDO/LDELOLW\$XWR/LDELOLW\DQG&\EHU(2SROLFLHVZLWKDZULWWHQFRQWUDFWLQSODFH :DLYHURIVXEURJDWLRQDSSOLHVWRWKH*HQHUDO/LDELOLW\$XWR/LDELOLW\DQG:RUNHU V&RPSHQVDWLRQSROLFLHV
3ROLF\.%
:URQJIXO7HUPLQDWLRQ
'LVFULPLQDWLRQ
6H[XDO+DUDVVPHQW
5HWDOLDWLRQ
:DJH +RXU/HJDO
&\EHU
3ROLF\'

(IIHFWLYH

,QVXUHU
$&(3URSHUW\DQG&DVXDOW\,QV&R
/LPLW

9DOOHMR &$


&2,,'
<0<
*HQHUDWHGXVLQJ&HUWLILFLDO
V6PDUW&2,1HWZRUNα7UDFN\RXU6XSSOLHUVLQUHDOWLPHDWFHUWLILFLDOFRPFRL 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


())(&7,9('$7(

1$0(',1685('
32/,&<180%(5
&$55,(5 1$,&&2'(
$*(1&<
/2&

$*(1&<&86720(5,'

$'',7,21$/5(0$5.66&+('8/( 3DJH RI
$'',7,21$/5(0$5.6
)250180%(5
)2507,7/(

7+,6$'',7,21$/5(0$5.6)250,6$6&+('8/(72$&25')250 ‹$&25'&25325$7,21$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG
7KH$&25'QDPHDQGORJRDUHUHJLVWHUHGPDUNVRI$&25'
$&25'



3DUDGLVR)LQDQFLDODQG,QVXUDQFH6HUYLFHV//&
'&
 &(57,),&$7(2)/,$%,/,7<,1685$1&(
3URIHVVLRQDO/LDELOLW\
3ROLF\'

(IIHFWLYH

,QVXUHU
$&(3URSHUW\DQG&DVXDOW\,QV&R
/LPLW

'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


7+,6(1'256(0(17&+$1*(67+(32/,&<3/($6(5($',7&$5()8//< )RUP 6/ 3DJH RI 
‹7KH+DUWIRUG

0D\LQFOXGHFRS\ULJKWHGPDWHULDORI,QVXUDQFH6HUYLFHV2IILFH,QFZLWKLWVSHUPLVVLRQ

%/$1.(7$'',7,21$/,1685('%<&2175$&7
7KLVHQGRUVHPHQWPRGLILHVLQVXUDQFHSURYLGHGXQGHUWKHIROORZLQJ

%86,1(66/,$%,/,7<&29(5$*()250
([FHSWDVRWKHUZLVHVWDWHGLQWKLVHQGRUVHPHQWWKHWHUPVDQGFRQGLWLRQVRIWKH3ROLF\DSSO\ $ 7KHIROORZLQJLVDGGHGWR6HFWLRQ & :+2,6$1,1685('

$GGLWLRQDO,QVXUHGV:KHQ5HTXLUHG%\:ULWWHQ&RQWUDFW:ULWWHQ$JUHHPHQW2U3HUPLW 7KH SHUVRQ
V
RU RUJDQL]DWLRQ
V
LGHQWLILHG LQ 3DUDJUDSKV D WKURXJK I EHORZ DUH DGGLWLRQDO LQVXUHGV ZKHQ \RX KDYH DJUHHG LQ D ZULWWHQ FRQWUDFW RU ZULWWHQ DJUHHPHQW RU ZKHQ UHTXLUHG E\ D ZULWWHQ SHUPLW LVVXHG E\ D VWDWH RU JRYHUQPHQWDO DJHQF\ RU VXEGLYLVLRQ RU SROLWLFDO VXEGLYLVLRQ WKDW VXFK SHUVRQ RU RUJDQL]DWLRQ EH DGGHG DV DQ DGGLWLRQDO LQVXUHG RQ \RXU &RYHUDJH 3DUW SURYLGHG WKH LQMXU\ RU GDPDJH RFFXUV VXEVHTXHQW WR WKH H[HFXWLRQ RI WKH FRQWUDFWRUDJUHHPHQWRUWKHLVVXDQFHRIWKHSHUPLW
$ SHUVRQ RU RUJDQL]DWLRQ LV DQ DGGLWLRQDO LQVXUHG XQGHU WKLV SURYLVLRQ RQO\ IRU WKDW SHULRG RI WLPH UHTXLUHG E\ WKH FRQWUDFWDJUHHPHQWRUSHUPLW
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
D 9HQGRUV
$Q\SHUVRQ
V
RURUJDQL]DWLRQ
V

UHIHUUHGWREHORZDVYHQGRU
EXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWRERGLO\LQMXU\RUSURSHUW\ GDPDJHDULVLQJRXWRI\RXUSURGXFWVZKLFKDUHGLVWULEXWHGRUVROGLQWKHUHJXODUFRXUVHRIWKHYHQGRU VEXVLQHVV
DQGRQO\LIWKLV&RYHUDJH3DUWSURYLGHVFRYHUDJHIRUERGLO\LQMXU\RUSURSHUW\GDPDJHLQFOXGHGZLWKLQWKH SURGXFWVFRPSOHWHGRSHUDWLRQVKD]DUG


7KHLQVXUDQFHDIIRUGHGWRWKHYHQGRULVVXEMHFWWRWKHIROORZLQJDGGLWLRQDOH[FOXVLRQV

7KLVLQVXUDQFHGRHVQRWDSSO\WR

D
%RGLO\LQMXU\RUSURSHUW\GDPDJHIRUZKLFKWKHYHQGRULVREOLJDWHGWRSD\GDPDJHVE\UHDVRQRIWKH DVVXPSWLRQRIOLDELOLW\LQDFRQWUDFWRUDJUHHPHQW 7KLVH[FOXVLRQGRHVQRWDSSO\WROLDELOLW\IRUGDPDJHV WKDWWKHYHQGRUZRXOGKDYHLQWKHDEVHQFHRIWKHFRQWUDFWRUDJUHHPHQW

E
$Q\H[SUHVVZDUUDQW\XQDXWKRUL]HGE\\RX

F
$Q\SK\VLFDORUFKHPLFDOFKDQJHLQWKHSURGXFWPDGHLQWHQWLRQDOO\E\WKHYHQGRU

G
5HSDFNDJLQJH[FHSWZKHQXQSDFNHGVROHO\IRUWKHSXUSRVHRILQVSHFWLRQGHPRQVWUDWLRQWHVWLQJRUWKH VXEVWLWXWLRQRISDUWVXQGHULQVWUXFWLRQVIURPWKHPDQXIDFWXUHUDQGWKHQUHSDFNDJHGLQWKHRULJLQDO

FRQWDLQHU

H
$Q\IDLOXUHWRPDNHVXFKLQVSHFWLRQVDGMXVWPHQWVWHVWVRUVHUYLFLQJDVWKHYHQGRUKDVDJUHHGWRPDNH RUQRUPDOO\XQGHUWDNHVWRPDNHLQWKHXVXDOFRXUVHRIEXVLQHVVLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKHGLVWULEXWLRQRUVDOH RIWKHSURGXFWV

I
'HPRQVWUDWLRQLQVWDOODWLRQVHUYLFLQJRUUHSDLURSHUDWLRQVH[FHSWVXFKRSHUDWLRQVSHUIRUPHGDWWKH YHQGRU
VSUHPLVHVLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKHVDOHRIWKHSURGXFW

J
3URGXFWVZKLFKDIWHUGLVWULEXWLRQRUVDOHE\\RXKDYHEHHQODEHOHGRUUHODEHOHGRUXVHGDVDFRQWDLQHU SDUWRULQJUHGLHQWRIDQ\RWKHUWKLQJRUVXEVWDQFHE\RUIRUWKHYHQGRU RU
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


7+,6(1'256(0(17&+$1*(67+(32/,&<3/($6(5($',7&$5()8//< )RUP 6/ 3DJH RI 
‹7KH+DUWIRUG

0D\LQFOXGHFRS\ULJKWHGPDWHULDORI,QVXUDQFH6HUYLFHV2IILFH,QFZLWKLWVSHUPLVVLRQ

K
%RGLO\LQMXU\RUSURSHUW\GDPDJHDULVLQJRXWRIWKHVROHQHJOLJHQFHRIWKHYHQGRUIRULWVRZQDFWVRU RPLVVLRQVRUWKRVHRILWVHPSOR\HHVRUDQ\RQHHOVHDFWLQJRQLWVEHKDOI +RZHYHUWKLVH[FOXVLRQGRHVQRW DSSO\WR

L
7KHH[FHSWLRQVFRQWDLQHGLQ3DUDJUDSKV
G
RU
I

RU

LL
6XFKLQVSHFWLRQVDGMXVWPHQWVWHVWVRUVHUYLFLQJDVWKHYHQGRUKDVDJUHHGWRPDNHRUQRUPDOO\ XQGHUWDNHVWRPDNHLQWKHXVXDOFRXUVHRIEXVLQHVVLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKHGLVWULEXWLRQRUVDOHRIWKH SURGXFWV


7KLVLQVXUDQFHGRHVQRWDSSO\WRDQ\LQVXUHGSHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQIURPZKRP\RXKDYHDFTXLUHGVXFK SURGXFWVRUDQ\LQJUHGLHQWSDUWRUFRQWDLQHUHQWHULQJLQWRDFFRPSDQ\LQJRUFRQWDLQLQJVXFKSURGXFWV E /HVVRUV2I(TXLSPHQW


$Q\SHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQIURPZKRP\RXOHDVHHTXLSPHQW EXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWRWKHLUOLDELOLW\IRUERGLO\
LQMXU\SURSHUW\GDPDJHRUSHUVRQDODQGDGYHUWLVLQJLQMXU\FDXVHGLQZKROHRULQSDUWE\\RXU PDLQWHQDQFHRSHUDWLRQRUXVHRIHTXLSPHQWOHDVHGWR\RXE\VXFKSHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQ


:LWKUHVSHFWWRWKHLQVXUDQFHDIIRUGHGWRWKHVHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGVWKLVLQVXUDQFHGRHVQRWDSSO\WRDQ\ RFFXUUHQFHZKLFKWDNHVSODFHDIWHU\RXFHDVHWROHDVHWKDWHTXLSPHQW F /HVVRUV2I/DQG2U3UHPLVHV


$Q\SHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQIURPZKRP\RXOHDVHODQGRUSUHPLVHVEXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWROLDELOLW\DULVLQJRXW RIWKHRZQHUVKLSPDLQWHQDQFHRUXVHRIWKDWSDUWRIWKHODQGRUSUHPLVHVOHDVHGWR\RX


:LWKUHVSHFWWRWKHLQVXUDQFHDIIRUGHGWRWKHVHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGVWKLVLQVXUDQFHGRHVQRWDSSO\WR

D
$Q\RFFXUUHQFHZKLFKWDNHVSODFHDIWHU\RXFHDVHWROHDVHWKDWODQGRUEHDWHQDQWLQWKDWSUHPLVHV RU

E
6WUXFWXUDODOWHUDWLRQVQHZFRQVWUXFWLRQRUGHPROLWLRQRSHUDWLRQVSHUIRUPHGE\RURQEHKDOIRIVXFKSHUVRQ RURUJDQL]DWLRQ
G $UFKLWHFWV(QJLQHHUV2U6XUYH\RUV


$Q\DUFKLWHFWHQJLQHHURUVXUYH\RUEXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWROLDELOLW\IRUERGLO\LQMXU\SURSHUW\GDPDJHRU SHUVRQDODQGDGYHUWLVLQJLQMXU\FDXVHGLQZKROHRULQSDUWE\\RXUDFWVRURPLVVLRQVRUWKHDFWVRU RPLVVLRQVRIWKRVHDFWLQJRQ\RXUEHKDOI

D
,QFRQQHFWLRQZLWK\RXUSUHPLVHV

E
,QWKHSHUIRUPDQFHRI\RXURQJRLQJRSHUDWLRQVSHUIRUPHGE\\RXRURQ\RXUEHKDOI RU

F
,QFRQQHFWLRQZLWK\RXUZRUNDQGLQFOXGHGZLWKLQWKHSURGXFWVFRPSOHWHGRSHUDWLRQVKD]DUGEXWRQO\ LI

L
7KHZULWWHQFRQWUDFWZULWWHQDJUHHPHQWRUSHUPLWUHTXLUHV\RXWRSURYLGHVXFKFRYHUDJHWRVXFK DGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHG
DQG

LL
7KLV&RYHUDJH3DUWSURYLGHVFRYHUDJHIRUERGLO\LQMXU\RUSURSHUW\GDPDJH LQFOXGHGZLWKLQWKH SURGXFWVFRPSOHWHGRSHUDWLRQVKD]DUG


:LWKUHVSHFWWRWKHLQVXUDQFHDIIRUGHGWRWKHVHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGVWKHIROORZLQJDGGLWLRQDOH[FOXVLRQDSSOLHV

7KLVLQVXUDQFHGRHVQRWDSSO\WRERGLO\LQMXU\SURSHUW\GDPDJHRUSHUVRQDODQGDGYHUWLVLQJLQMXU\ DULVLQJRXWRIWKHUHQGHULQJRIRUWKHIDLOXUHWRUHQGHUDQ\SURIHVVLRQDOVHUYLFHVLQFOXGLQJ

L
7KHSUHSDULQJDSSURYLQJRUIDLOXUHWRSUHSDUHRUDSSURYHPDSVVKRSGUDZLQJVRSLQLRQVUHSRUWV VXUYH\VILHOGRUGHUVFKDQJHRUGHUVGHVLJQVRUGUDZLQJVDQGVSHFLILFDWLRQV RU

LL
6XSHUYLVRU\VXUYH\LQJLQVSHFWLRQDUFKLWHFWXUDORUHQJLQHHULQJDFWLYLWLHV 7KLVH[FOXVLRQDSSOLHVHYHQLIWKHFODLPVDOOHJHQHJOLJHQFHRURWKHUZURQJGRLQJLQWKHVXSHUYLVLRQKLULQJ HPSOR\PHQWWUDLQLQJRUPRQLWRULQJRIRWKHUVE\DQLQVXUHGLIWKH³ERGLO\LQMXU\´³SURSHUW\GDPDJH´RU ³SHUVRQDODQGDGYHUWLVLQJLQMXU\´DULVHVRXWRIWKHUHQGHULQJRIRUWKHIDLOXUHWRUHQGHUDQ\SURIHVVLRQDO VHUYLFH
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


7+,6(1'256(0(17&+$1*(67+(32/,&<3/($6(5($',7&$5()8//< )RUP 6/ 3DJH RI 
‹7KH+DUWIRUG

0D\LQFOXGHFRS\ULJKWHGPDWHULDORI,QVXUDQFH6HUYLFHV2IILFH,QFZLWKLWVSHUPLVVLRQ

H 6WDWH2U*RYHUQPHQWDO$JHQF\2U6XEGLYLVLRQ2U3ROLWLFDO6XEGLYLVLRQ,VVXLQJ3HUPLW


$Q\VWDWHRUJRYHUQPHQWDODJHQF\RUVXEGLYLVLRQRUSROLWLFDOVXEGLYLVLRQEXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWRRSHUDWLRQV SHUIRUPHGE\\RXRURQ\RXUEHKDOIIRUZKLFKWKHVWDWHRUJRYHUQPHQWDODJHQF\RUVXEGLYLVLRQRUSROLWLFDO VXEGLYLVLRQKDVLVVXHGDSHUPLW


:LWKUHVSHFWWRWKHLQVXUDQFHDIIRUGHGWRWKHVHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGVWKLVLQVXUDQFHGRHVQRWDSSO\WR

D
%RGLO\LQMXU\SURSHUW\GDPDJHRUSHUVRQDODQGDGYHUWLVLQJLQMXU\DULVLQJRXWRIRSHUDWLRQVSHUIRUPHG IRUWKHIHGHUDOJRYHUQPHQWVWDWHRUPXQLFLSDOLW\
RU

E
%RGLO\LQMXU\RUSURSHUW\GDPDJHLQFOXGHGZLWKLQWKHSURGXFWVFRPSOHWHGRSHUDWLRQVKD]DUG I $Q\2WKHU3DUW\


$Q\RWKHUSHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQZKRLVQRWLQRQHRIWKHFDWHJRULHVRUFODVVHV OLVWHGDERYHLQ3DUDJUDSKV D WKURXJK HDERYHEXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWROLDELOLW\IRUERGLO\LQMXU\SURSHUW\GDPDJHRUSHUVRQDODQG DGYHUWLVLQJLQMXU\FDXVHGLQZKROHRULQSDUWE\\RXUDFWVRURPLVVLRQVRUWKHDFWVRURPLVVLRQVRIWKRVH DFWLQJRQ\RXUEHKDOI

D
,QWKHSHUIRUPDQFHRI\RXURQJRLQJRSHUDWLRQVSHUIRUPHGE\\RXRURQ\RXUEHKDOI

E
,QFRQQHFWLRQZLWK\RXUSUHPLVHVRZQHGE\RUUHQWHGWR\RX RU

F
,QFRQQHFWLRQZLWK\RXUZRUNDQGLQFOXGHGZLWKLQWKHSURGXFWVFRPSOHWHGRSHUDWLRQVKD]DUGEXWRQO\ LI

L
7KHZULWWHQFRQWUDFWZULWWHQDJUHHPHQWRUSHUPLWUHTXLUHV\RXWRSURYLGHVXFKFRYHUDJHWRVXFK DGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHG
DQG

LL
7KLV&RYHUDJH3DUWSURYLGHVFRYHUDJHIRUERGLO\LQMXU\RUSURSHUW\GDPDJHLQFOXGHGZLWKLQWKH SURGXFWVFRPSOHWHGRSHUDWLRQVKD]DUG


:LWKUHVSHFWWRWKHLQVXUDQFHDIIRUGHGWRWKHVHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGVWKHIROORZLQJDGGLWLRQDOH[FOXVLRQDSSOLHV

7KLVLQVXUDQFHGRHVQRWDSSO\WRERGLO\LQMXU\SURSHUW\GDPDJHRUSHUVRQDODQGDGYHUWLVLQJLQMXU\DULVLQJ RXWRIWKHUHQGHULQJRIRUWKHIDLOXUHWRUHQGHUDQ\SURIHVVLRQDODUFKLWHFWXUDOHQJLQHHULQJRUVXUYH\LQJ VHUYLFHVLQFOXGLQJ

D
7KHSUHSDULQJDSSURYLQJRUIDLOXUHWRSUHSDUHRUDSSURYHPDSVVKRSGUDZLQJVRSLQLRQVUHSRUWV VXUYH\VILHOGRUGHUVFKDQJHRUGHUVGHVLJQVRUGUDZLQJVDQGVSHFLILFDWLRQV RU

E
6XSHUYLVRU\VXUYH\LQJLQVSHFWLRQDUFKLWHFWXUDORUHQJLQHHULQJDFWLYLWLHV 7KLVH[FOXVLRQDSSOLHVHYHQLIWKHFODLPVDOOHJHQHJOLJHQFHRURWKHUZURQJGRLQJLQWKHVXSHUYLVLRQKLULQJ HPSOR\PHQWWUDLQLQJRUPRQLWRULQJRIRWKHUVE\DQLQVXUHGLIWKH³ERGLO\LQMXU\´³SURSHUW\GDPDJH´RU ³SHUVRQDODQGDGYHUWLVLQJLQMXU\´DULVHVRXWRIWKHUHQGHULQJRIRUWKHIDLOXUHWRUHQGHUDQ\SURIHVVLRQDOVHUYLFH GHVFULEHGLQ3DUDJUDSKV I


D
RU I


E
DERYH
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


T HI S E N D O R S E M E N T C H A N G E S T H E P O LI C Y. P L E A S E R E A D I T C A R E F U L L Y.

C o u nt er si g n e d b y
A ut h ori z e d R e pr e s e nt ati v e
F or m W C 0 0 0 3 1 3 Pri nt e d i n U. S. A.

ABCDEFGHIJ

W AI V E R O F O U R RI G H T T O R E C O V E R

F R O M O T H E R S E N D O R S E M E N T
P oli c y N u m b er: E n d or s e m e nt N u m b er:

Eff e cti v e D at e: Eff e cti v e h o ur i s t h e s a m e a s st at e d o n t h e I nf or m ati o n P a g e of t h e p oli c y.

N a m e d I n s ur e d a n d A d dr e s s:

W e h a v e t h e ri g h t t o r e c o v er o ur p a y m e nt s fr o m a n y o n e li a bl e f or a n i nj ur y c o v er e d b y t hi s p oli c y. W e will n ot e nf or c e o ur ri g ht a g ai n st t h e p er s o n or or g a n i z ati o n n a m e d i n t h e S c h e d ul e.

T hi s a gr e e m e nt s h all n ot o p er at e dir e ctl y or i n dir e ctl y t o b e n efit a n y o n e n ot n a m e d i n t h e S c h e d ul e.

S C H E D U L E
D o c u si g n E n v el o p e I D: 1 5 6 C D 6 5 A- A 6 1 1- 4 3 3 4- 9 E 0 8- 5 B 1 9 0 8 3 F F 3 9 8

5(62/87,21121&
$5(62/87,212)7+(&,7<&281&,/2)7+(&,7<2)9$//(-2 $33529,1*7+(&2168/7$17$1'352)(66,21$/6(59,&(6$*5((0(17:,7+ &$3,72/$'92&$&<3$571(56)25*5$175(/$7('6(59,&(6)25 9$//(-232/,&('(3$570(17,1$1$0281712772(;&((' 7+528*+-81($1'$87+25,=,1*7+(&,7<0$1$*(572(;(&87(6$0( :+(5($6LQ)HEUXDU\WKH&LW\RI9DOOHMRHQWHUHGLQWRD&RQVXOWDQWDQG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV $JUHHPHQWZLWK&DSLWRO$GYRFDF\3DUWQHUV
³&$3´
WRDVVLVW9DOOHMR3ROLFH'HSDUWPHQW
³93'´
ZLWK
JUDQWSODQQLQJDGYRFDF\ZULWLQJDQGPDQDJHPHQW
³2ULJLQDO$JUHHPHQW´

DQG
:+(5($6RYHUWKHSDVWIRXUSOXV\HDUV&$3KDVVXFFHVVIXOO\LGHQWLILHGZULWWHQDQGVHFXUHGIXQGLQJ LQH[FHVVRIPLOOLRQDFURVVVHYHUDO93'SULRULW\DUHDV DQG
:+(5($693'DOVRKDVWZRRWKHU&$3ZULWWHQJUDQWDSSOLFDWLRQVSHQGLQJ DQG
:+(5($6&$3¶VVHUYLFHVUHVXOWLQJUDQWIXQGLQJIRUFULWLFDO93'WHFKQRORJ\DQGHTXLSPHQWDVZHOO DVYDULRXVFRPPXQLW\SURJUDPVWKH&LW\RI9DOOHMRZRXOGQRWRWKHUZLVHEHDEOHWRIXQG DQG
:+(5($6WKH2ULJLQDO$JUHHPHQWH[SLUHGRQ-XQH 12: 7+(5()25( %( ,7 5(62/9(' WKDW WKH &LW\ &RXQFLO RI WKH &LW\ RI 9DOOHMR KHUHE\ DSSURYHV WKH &RQVXOWDQW DQG 3URIHVVLRQDO 6HUYLFHV $JUHHPHQW ZLWK &$3 IRU JUDQWUHODWHG VHUYLFHV IRU 93'IRUDQDPRXQWQRWWRH[FHHGWKURXJK-XQH 12: 7+(5()25( %( ,7 )857+(5 5(62/9(' WKDW &$3¶V VHUYLFHV ZLOO EH IXQGHG WKURXJK JUDQWVRU93'¶V6/()
)XQG
IXQGDVDSSURSULDWH
12:7+(5()25(%( ,7 )857+(5 5(62/9('WKDWWKH&LW\&RXQFLO RIWKH&LW\ RI 9DOOHMR KHUHE\DXWKRUL]HVWKH&LW\0DQDJHUWRH[HFXWHVDLG&RQVXOWDQWDQG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV$JUHHPHQWZLWK &$3IRUDQDPRXQWQRWWRH[FHHGWKURXJK-XQH $GRSWHGE\WKH&LW\&RXQFLORIWKH&LW\RI9DOOHMRDWDVSHFLDOPHHWLQJKHOGRQ$XJXVWZLWKWKH IROORZLQJYRWH

$<(6
 0D\RU6RUFH&RXQFLOPHPEHUV*RUGRQ/HGLMX0DWLDV0DWXODFDQG3DOPDUHV 12(6
 1RQH
$%6(17
 9LFH0D\RU%UHJHQ]HU
$%67$,1
 1RQH
$1'5($625&(0$<25
$77(67

'$:1*$%5$+$0621&,7<&/(5.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
)(()%$
'$%)$
))%


'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&'$$
(%
))


-XQ
30

Contract and Routing Form
Contract Number:3'

Requisition Number:
Date Originated:

Finance Department · 555 Santa Clara Street · Vallejo · CA · 94590 · 707.648.4592 Department:3ROLFH'HSDUWPHQW
Staff Contact: &ODXGLD:LOOLDPVFODXGLDZLOOLDPV#FLW\RIYDOOHMRQHW Contract Type: $PHQGPHQW
Vendor: &DSLWRO$GYRFDF\3DUWQHUV Vendor Number: Contract Not to Exceed Amount:
Contract Start Date: -XO End Date: -XQ Option to Extend: <HVLQWHUYDOVRIRQH\HDURUOHVVQRWWRH[FHHGILYH\HDUV Authority to Contract: &LW\&RXQFLO Date to Council: 0D\ Attachments are uploaded for review here: https://bit.ly/vContracts $SSURYHG3UH5HTXLVLWLRQ)RUP
2ULJLQDO$JUHHPHQWZLWKDQ\$PHQGPHQWV
,QVXUDQFH
,KDYHXSORDGHGDGGLWLRQDOILOHV1R
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
$&'$($'%
)

Contract and Routing Form
6LJQDWXUH3DJH
Department Initial Date Comment
Originating Department/Division
Risk Manager
City Attorney's Office
Department Head
Finance Department
City Manager
City Clerk
Return executed contract to: &ODXGLD:LOOLDPV
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
$&'$($'%
)








J u n 8, 2 0 2 6 5: 1 9 P M, 1 4 6 8 8 7 5 6 1 4
Pr e R e q uisiti o n F or m
C o ntr a ct N u m b er : 2 6 P D 0 9 5
Fi n a nc e D e p art m e nt 5 5 5 S a nt a Cl ar a Str e et V all ej o C A 9 4 5 9 0 ∙ 7 0 7. 6 4 8. 4 5 9 2 D e p art m e nt: P oli c e D e p art m e nt,
St aff C o nt act: Cl a u di a Willi a m s, cl a u di a. willi a m s @ cit y of v all ej o. n et V e n d or: C a pit ol A d v o c a c y P art n er s V e n d or N u m b er 1 0 2 7 8 1 er m: M ulti y e ar T er m
A ntici p at e d St art D at e: J u n 0 8, 2 0 2 6
A ntici p at e d E n d D at e: J u n 0 8, 2 0 2 6
A ntici p at e d C o ntr act T y p e: A m e n d m e nt
P urc h asi n g A ut h orit y: Cit y C o u n cil A ntici p at e d D at e t o C o u ncil: M a y 2 6, 2 0 2 6 T ot al Pr oj ect e d E x p e n dit ur e: 1 3 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 A ntici p at e d Acc o u nt N u m b er T B D
M ulti pl e Pr oj ect N u m b ers? M ulti pl e Acc o u nt N u m b ers? N o, j ust o n e D escri pti o n of Pr o p os e d P urc h as e:

Gr a nt writi n g a n d m a n a g e m e nt s er vi c e s. T h er e will b e s e v er al pr oj e ct n u m b er s a n d a c c o u nt n u m b er s. At t hi s ti m e, t h e A m e n d m e nt ( a d diti o n al $ 5 0 0, 0 0 0 a d d e d vi a t hi s A m e n d m e nt) will i n cl u d e gr a nt f u n d e d gr a nt m a n a g e m e nt s er vi c e s f or t h e S CI P Gr a nt ( G P D 0 2 0), L E M H W A Gr a nt ( G P D 0 2 1), O V C Gr a nt ( G P D 0 2 2), a n d C al VI P C o h ort 5 Gr a nt ( G P D 0 2 3).

I h a v e r e vi e w e d t h e cit y wi d e c o ntr acts, e x p e n dit ur e a n d e nc u m br a nc e r e p orts t o c o m pl y wit h t h e V M C.

It i s a n e xi sti n g v e n d or a n d I a m w or ki n g t o t a k e a n a cti o n t o t h e Cit y C o u ncil b e c a u s e it will e x c e e d t h e Cit y wi d e c a p of $ 1 0 0, 0 0 0 i n a si n gl e F Y.

C o m p etiti v e Pr oc ess: I a m e x e m pt fr o m h a vi n g t o c o m pl et e a C o m p etiti v e Pr o c e s s E x e m pti o n E x pl a n ati o n
S p e ci ali z e d v e n d or f or gr a nt c o n s ulti n g t h at i s writt e n i nt o s o m e gr a nt s a n d h a s b e e n w or ki n g wit h V P D f or s e v er al y e ar s
E x pl a n ati o n f or V e n d or S el ecti o n:

3. 2 0. 0 9 0( A)( 4) L e g al or pr of e s si o n al s er vi c e s t h at ar e hi g hl y s p e ci ali z e d U pl o a d e d d oc u m e nts a v ail a bl e f or r e vi e w htt ps:// bit.l y/ v Pr e R e qs W arr a nt y N o
Ori gi n al C o ntr a ct/ A gr e e m e nt A m e n d m e nt D o c u si g n E n v el o p e I D: 3 6 4 7 A 1 C D- A 0 5 8- 8 8 E 4- 8 1 1 2- 5 A 7 4 1 D 7 8 3 B 9 F

'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
$&'$($'%
)

3UH5HTXLVLWLRQ6LJQDWXUH6HFWLRQ
Department Comment
Supervisor/Manager:-DVRQ7D
Title:&KLHIRI3ROLFH
E-mail:MDVRQWD#FLW\RIYDOOHMRQHW
B 
B
6LJQDWXUH 'DWH
Delegated Signee:+DUU\%ODFN
Title:,QWHULP&LW\0DQDJHU
E-mail:KDUU\EODFN#FLW\RIYDOOHMRQHW
B
6LJQDWXUH 'DWH
Route Final HTE PO to City Clerk for Contract Log
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
$&'$($'%
)



Approved as to form:

By: for
Veronica Nebb, City Attorney

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

CONSULTANT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CITY OF VALLEJO AND

CAPITOL ADVOCACY PARTNERS, LLC
The City of Vallejo (“City”) and Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC (“Consultant”) entered into a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement dated August 6, 2025 (“the Agreement”) (City Contract #26PD095) to provide a variety of services, including grantfunded grant management services. This First Amendment to the Agreement (“First Amendment”) is made an entered into on this 1st day of May 2026.

Consultant and City do mutually agree as follows:

1. Payment for Additional Services. The following sentence is removed from the last row on page 11 of Attachment 1 to Exhibit A: “Additional grants may be added at $3,500 each at mutual agreement by parties.”
The following is added at the end of the table on page 11 of Attachment 1 to Exhibit A:

Section 1 of Exhibit B is hereby replaced with the following:

A. Services: City agrees to pay Consultant, at the rate(s) specified in Attachment 1 of Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference, for the services identified therein and for all authorized reimbursable expenses, for a total not-to-exceed amount of One Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,300,000). Said notto-exceed amount shall include an amount to be paid to Consultant for outstanding invoices totaling $43,090 for services rendered during Fiscal Year 2024 – 2025.

Consultant shall notify City in writing no later than sixty (60) days prior to the estimated date when Consultant will have billed City the maximum payment

GRANT-FUNDED GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ADDED
(per project managed, billed monthly)
SCIP Grant
LEMHWA Grant
CalVIP – Cohort 5 Grant
OVC Victims of Crime Grant
$3,000 per month
$1,500 per month
$3,500 per month
$3,500 per month

ADDITIONAL GRANT-FUNDED GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Additional grants may be added via a memorandum signed by the parties.
$3,500 per month,
unless the parties
agree in writing to
another amount
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
$&'$($'%
)

First Amendment to Agreement Between City of Vallejo and Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC Page 2 of 3 (Revised 01.2019)
amount permitted under this Agreement, and Consultant shall provide City with an estimate of the additional compensation required to complete the project.

2. Integration. This First Amendment contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this First Amendment. This First Amendment shall not be amended or modified except by a written agreement executed by each of the parties. Except as specifically revised herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and Consultant shall perform all duties, obligations and conditions required under the Agreement.

3. Inconsistencies. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this First Amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of this First Amendment shall control in all respects.

4. Ambiguities. The parties have each carefully reviewed this First Amendment and have agreed to each term of this First Amendment. No ambiguity shall be presumed to be construed against either party.

5. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed by the parties in one or more counterparts all of which collectively shall constitute one document and agreement.

6. Authority. The person signing this First Amendment for Consultant hereby represents and warrants that he or she is fully authorized to sign this First Amendment on behalf of Consultant.
(SIGNATURES ARE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE)
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
$&'$($'%
)

First Amendment to Agreement Between City of Vallejo and Capitol Advocacy Partners, LLC Page 3 of 3 (Revised 01.2019)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this First Amendment on the day and year first hereinabove appearing.

CAPITOL ADVOCACY PARTNERS, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company
BY:

Dana DeBeaumont
Partner
DATE:
(City Seal)
CITY OF VALLEJO, a California municipal
corporation
BY:

Harry E. Black
Interim City Manager
DATE:

ATTEST:

Dawn G. Abrahamson
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Jason Ta
Chief of Police
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

VERONICA A. F. NEBB
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:

ARMOND SARKIS
Risk Manager
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
$&'$($'%
)
 

5(62/87,21121&
$5(62/87,212)7+(&,7<&281&,/2)7+(&,7<2)9$//(-2 $33529,1*7+(),567$0(1'0(17727+(&2168/7$17$1'
352)(66,21$/6(59,&(6$*5((0(17:,7+&$3,72/$'92&$&<3$571(56 $1'$87+25,=,1*7+(&,7<0$1$*(572(;(&87(6$0(
:+(5($6WKH&LW\RI9DOOHMRHQWHUHGLQWRD&RQVXOWDQWDQG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV$JUHHPHQW ZLWK &DSLWRO $GYRFDF\ 3DUWQHUV
³&$3´
 IRU D QRWWRH[FHHG EXGJHW RI  WR DVVLVW 9DOOHMR 3ROLFH 'HSDUWPHQW
³93'´
 ZLWK JUDQW SODQQLQJ DGYRFDF\ ZULWLQJ DQG PDQDJHPHQW WKURXJK-XQH
³$JUHHPHQW´&LW\&RQWUDFW3'


DQG
:+(5($6 WKH YDVW PDMRULW\ RI WRWDO H[SHQGLWXUHV XQGHU WKH $JUHHPHQW DUH IRU JUDQW PDQDJHPHQWVHUYLFHV IXQGHGE\WKHJUDQWEHLQJPDQDJHG LHJUDQWIXQGHGJUDQWPDQDJHPHQW

VHUYLFHV

DQG
:+(5($6 WKHVH JUDQWIXQGHG JUDQW PDQDJHPHQW VHUYLFHV DUH EHLQJ DGGHG PRUH IUHTXHQWO\ WKDQDQWLFLSDWHGDWWKHWLPHRIWKH$JUHHPHQW
DQG
:+(5($6ZLWKLQWKHSDVWIHZPRQWKVWKHIROORZLQJJUDQWIXQGHGJUDQWPDQDJHPHQWVHUYLFHV KDYHEHHQDGGHG

*5$17
7RWDO1RW7R([FHHG
$PRXQW 'XUDWLRQ
&RVW3HU
0RQWK
6&,3  PRQWKV 
/(0+:$  PRQWKV 
&DO9,3&RKRUW  PRQWKV  29&9LFWLPVRI*UDQW  PRQWKV  
:+(5($6WKHSURSRVHG)LUVW$PHQGPHQWWRWKH$JUHHPHQWZLWK&$3 
 0HPRULDOL]HVWKHDGGLWLRQRIJUDQWIXQGHGJUDQWPDQDJHPHQWVHUYLFHVIRUWKHIRXUJUDQWV GHWDLOHGDERYH

 $GGV  WR WKH QRWWRH[FHHG DPRXQW IRU DGGLWLRQDO JUDQWIXQGHG JUDQW PDQDJHPHQWVHUYLFHV
DQG
 $XWKRUL]HV WKH DGGLWLRQ RI IXUWKHU JUDQWIXQGHG JUDQW PDQDJHPHQW VHUYLFHV YLD D PHPRUDQGXPVLJQHGE\WKHSDUWLHV
:+(5($6WKH)LUVW$PHQGPHQWDOORZVIRU FRQWUDFWFDSDFLW\FRQWLQXLW\DQGH[SHGLHQF\DVWKH XQGHUVWDIIHG93'WHDPVHHNVWROHYHUDJHDVPDQ\VWDWHDQGIHGHUDOJUDQWVDVSRVVLEOHWREHQHILW WKHFRPPXQLW\
12: 7+(5()25( %( ,7 5(62/9(' WKDW WKH &LW\ &RXQFLO RI WKH &LW\ RI 9DOOHMR KHUHE\DSSURYHVWKH)LUVW$PHQGPHQWWRWKH$JUHHPHQWZLWK&$3 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&()%'$%'() 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,' $&'$($'%
)

12:7+(5()25(%( ,7)857+(5 5(62/9('WKDWWKH&LW\&RXQFLO RIWKH&LW\ RI 9DOOHMRKHUHE\DXWKRUL]HVWKH&LW\0DQDJHUWRH[HFXWHVDLG)LUVW$PHQGPHQWWRWKH$JUHHPHQW ZLWK&$3
$GRSWHGE\WKH&RXQFLORIWKH&LW\RI9DOOHMRDWDUHJXODUPHHWLQJKHOGRQ0D\ ZLWKWKHIROORZLQJYRWH

$<(6
 0D\RU6RUFH9LFH0D\RU0DWXODF&RXQFLOPHPEHUV%UHJHQ]HU*RUGRQ 0DWLDVDQG3DOPDUHV
12(6
 1RQH
$%6(17
 &RXQFLOPHPEHU/HGLMX
$%67$,1
 1RQH
$1'5($625&(0$<25
$77(67

'$:1*$%5$+$0621&,7<&/(5.
'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,'
&()%'$%'() 'RFXVLJQ(QYHORSH,' $&'$($'%
)

CONSENT CALENDAR 8.K.

DATE: October 13, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Nalungo Conley, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIVE-YEAR LEASE AGREEMENT WITH URBAN FUSIONS, LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 285 MARE ISLAND WAY (APN 0055-170-400), WITH ONE FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OPTION, FINDING

APPROVAL OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15301, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LEASE

AGREEMENT

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution approving a five-year Lease Agreement with Urban Fusions, LLC for the property located at 285 Mare Island Way, Vallejo, California 94590 (APN 0055-170-400), with one five-year extension option, finding approval of the Lease Agreement exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Lease Agreement.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
To stimulate economic growth and activate the central waterfront, staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Lease Agreement for the property located at 285 Mare Island Way.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
A primary goal for the City is to stimulate development near the Mare Island Causeway, the ferry building, the downtown corridor, and the southern and central waterfront sites. Achieving these goals requires collaborating with existing and prospective tenants to drive economic development that benefits the community. The negotiation of this proposed lease directly supports these objectives by bringing economic activity and revitalization to the central waterfront.

On May 14, 2024, the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation terminated its lease agreement with the City for 285 Mare Island Way and the adjacent Waterfront History Park, and the property has remained vacant since that time.

On September 16, 2025, City Staff presented Urban Fusions’ vision for the location to the City Council. Their preliminary concept focuses on rehabilitating the premises to establish a new commercial kitchen and dining area, creating a restaurant that will serve the downtown area and contribute to the ongoing revitalization of the waterfront.

To support development, it is in the City’s best interest to lease this vacant property and attract active

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIVE-YEAR LEASE AGREEMENT WITH URBAN FUSIONS, LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 285 MARE ISLAND WAY (APN 0055-170-400), WITH ONE FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OPTION, FINDING

APPROVAL OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15301, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

LEASE AGREEMENT

businesses like Urban Fusions to the area. The proposed lease structure facilitates this by offering future rent offsets in exchange for the tenant's substantial upfront investment in the design, construction, and rehabilitation of the existing and vacant site.

The proposed agreement establishes a five (5) year initial lease term with one (1) five (5) year extension option, for a potential total of ten (10) years. Based on comparable local rent, fair market rent is set at $7,239.58 per month, totaling $86,874.96 annually. To offset the tenant's upfront rehabilitation costs, the City will provide a monthly rent credit equal to the fair market rent value during the first 48 months of the lease, capping at the actual amount invested up to $304,063. Additionally, the tenant will contribute to the maintenance of the surrounding sidewalks and landscaping by paying a reasonable Common Area Maintenance fee to the City. Under the terms of the agreement, the tenant is required to submit all entitlement applications within three months of the lease execution date.

Next Steps:

If the City Council approves the proposed lease, the agreement will be executed, and City staff will collaborate with the tenant's representatives to facilitate the project. Construction of tenant improvements will commence following the approval of all necessary entitlements and building permits.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed lease will not require any General Fund expenditures for the duration of the agreement. Future lease revenue will yield $86,874.96 after the fifth year of the lease and will increase annually thereafter based on the defined Consumer Price Index.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), because the Lease Agreement involves the lease and continued use of an existing facility. Further appropriate environmental review will be conducted at the time the proposed tenant improvements are formally submitted for entitlements.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution Approving Urban Fusions Lease_CAO Stamp

2. Urban Fusions Lease_CAO Stamp

CONTACT
Nalungo Conley, Assistant City Manager
[email protected]

RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO APPROVING A FIVEYEAR LEASE AGREEMENT WITH URBAN FUSIONS, LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 285 MARE ISLAND WAY (APN 0055-170-400), WITH ONE FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION

OPTION, FINDING APPROVAL OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15301, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LEASE

AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, on May 14, 2024, the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation terminated its lease agreement with the City for 285 Mare Island Way and the adjacent Waterfront History Park, and the property has remained vacant since that time; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2025, City staff made a presentation to the City Council outlining Urban Fusions’ concept and vision to rehabilitate the premises to establish a new commercial kitchen and restaurant; and
WHEREAS, a primary goal of the City of Vallejo is to stimulate economic growth and development near the Mare Island Causeway, the ferry building, the downtown corridor, and the southern and central waterfront sites, and the proposed project supports those objectives; and WHEREAS, City staff negotiated the terms of a proposed lease agreement for an initial term of five (5) years with one (1) five-year extension option, with monthly rent of $7,239.58 ($86,874.96 annually); and
WHEREAS, the proposed lease agreement supports the rehabilitation and re-use of the Cityowned building by providing rent credits during the first forty-eight (48) months of the lease to credit the tenant's upfront investment in the design, construction, and re-use of the property, in an amount up to approximately $300,000; and
WHEREAS, the proposed lease agreement further establishes that the tenant will contribute to the maintenance of the surrounding common area, including sidewalks and landscaping, through the payment of a common area maintenance fee to the City; and WHEREAS, the proposed lease involves an existing building and continued use of an existing facility and therefore falls within the class of activities described in California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), which is exempt from CEQA.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds that approval of the Lease Agreement with Urban Fusions, LLC for 285 Mare Island Way is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the Lease Agreement involves the lease and continued use of an existing facility.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the Lease Agreement with Urban Fusions, LLC for 285 Mare Island Way, with one five-year extension option.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Lease Agreement with Urban Fusions, LLC and, in consultation with the City Attorney, to make nonsubstantial edits to the final Lease Agreement as necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution.

ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO at a regular meeting held on June 23, 2026, with the following vote:

AYES: None
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

ANDREA SORCE, MAYOR
ATTEST:

DAWN G. ABRAHAMSON, CITY CLERK

NO FEE RECORDING PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE §27383

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
AFTER RECORDATION, MAIL TO:

City of Vallejo
Attn: City Clerk
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-400
Triple Net (NNN) LEASE
By and Between

THE CITY OF VALLEJO
and

URBAN FUSIONS, LLC
285 Mare Island Way

2 | P a g e

1 | P a g e
V 1 4
LEASE
Section 1. Definitions
Section 2. Premises
Section 3. Term and Termination
Section 4. Rent
Section 5. Use
Section 6. Common Areas
Section 7. Maintenance and Repairs
Section 8. Lessee Improvements
Section 9. Taxes
Section 10. Services and Utilities
Section 11. Signage Requirements
Section 12. Assignment and Subletting
Section 13. Insurance
Section 14. Indemnification
Section 15. Hazardous Materials
Section 16. Holding Over
Section 17 Surrender Conditions
Section 18. Non-Discrimination
Section 19. Force Majeure
Section 20. Legal Effect
Section 21. Defaults and Remedies
Section 22. Notices
Section 23. Waiver
Section 24. Governing Law
Section 25. Entire Agreement
Section 26. Inspection By Certified Access Specialist
Section 27. Prevailing Wages
Section 28. City Municipal Powers

LEASE AGREEMENT
285 Mare Island Way
APN 0055-170-400
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT ("Lease") is entered into as of ______,__________, 2026, by and between the City of Vallejo, a municipal corporation (the "Lessor"), and Urban Fusions, LLC, a California limited liability company (the "Lessee"), (hereinafter, collectively the "Parties") with respect to the following facts:

RECITALS
A. City is the owner of the Building located at 285 Mare Island Way in the City of Vallejo, California, County of Solano, consisting of approximately 3,689 square feet, described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Premises”); and B. On September 16, 2025, Urban Fusions, LLC’s proposal to rehabilitate the Premises with a new commercial kitchen and dining areas for a new restaurant that would serve the downtown area and contribute to the revitalization of the waterfront was presented to the City Council. City Council directed staff to work with Urban Fusions, LLC to negotiate a lease; and C. The parties now desire to enter into such a lease pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE the Parties hereto agree as follows:

SECTION 1.

DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1 Definitions.

The following terms shall have the following meanings in this Lease:
“City” shall mean the City of Vallejo in its governmental capacity; “Common Area” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6 below; “Entitlements” shall mean all land use entitlements, City and other agency permits, required environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Bay Conservation and Development Commission and any other permits, entitlements, permissions, consents, etc. required for the construction of the Lessee Improvements, including but not limited to permits or entitlements that may be required by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), the US Army Corps of

3 | P a g e
V 1 4
Engineers, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, California Fish and Wildlife, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the State Lands Commission;
“Event of Default” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 21 below; “Lease Commencement Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2 below; "Lease Term" shall mean an initial term of five (5) years together with any extension thereof in accordance with Section 3.3 below;
"Lessee" shall mean Urban Fusions, LLC and its permitted successors and assigns; “Lessee Improvements” shall mean those improvements specifically approved by the City Council of the City pursuant to the Entitlements described in Section 8 below; "Lessor" shall mean the City of Vallejo in its proprietary capacity; “Premises” shall mean the Building consisting of approximately 3,689 square feet on that certain real property located generally at 285 Mare Island Way in Vallejo, California, County of Solano, as legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. “Rent Adjustment Date” shall mean the day after the 60th month after the Lease Commencement Date.

SECTION 2

PREMISES

2.1 Lessor leases the Premises to the Lessee, and the Lessee leases the Premises from the Lessor, pursuant to the terms of this Lease.

2.2 The Parties shall cause a Memorandum of Lease to be recorded against the Premises in the Official Records of the County of Solano.

2.3 Lessee accepts the Premises in its "as is" physical condition, except that Lessor shall repair or replace any broken or damaged windows prior to the Lease Commencement Date.

Lessee acknowledges and agrees that Lessor has not made any express or implied representations, warranties, guaranties, promises, statements of assurances whatsoever as to the condition of the Premises or any matter that may concern or affect the Premises now, in the past or in the future.

SECTION 3

TERM AND TERMINATION

3.1 The Lease Term shall commence on the Commencement Date and shall continue for five (5) years unless extended or until this Lease is terminated as otherwise provided herein.

4 | P a g e
V 1 4

3.2 The Lease Commencement Date shall mean the business day following the date on which this Lease is fully executed by both Parties.

3.3 Option to Extend. Lessor hereby grants to Lessee the right and option (the “Option”) to extend the term of this Lease, for the Premises in “as is” condition, for one (1) additional period of five (5) years (“Option Term”). Provided Lessee is not in default at the time of exercise and has not been in default under the Lease more than twice during the 24 months prior to the Option exercise, even if such default is cured, Lessee may exercise the Option by sending written notice to Lessor (“Exercise Notice”) no more than twelve months but no less than nine months prior to the expiration of the Lease Term. If Lessee fails to provide such notice, Lessee shall have no further or additional right to extend or renew the Term of this Lease.

3.4 Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Lease shall be terminable by Lessor (i) upon the occurrence of an Event of Default on the part of Lessee as provided in Section 21 below, (ii) upon one hundred and eighty (180) days’ written notice if the Premises are needed for City governmental purposes, as determined by the City Council in its sole and absolute discretion, or (iii) as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease.

3.5 Lessee's Right to Terminate for Failure to Obtain Entitlements. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Lease, if, despite Lessee's diligent, good faith efforts, the Entitlements necessary to construct and operate the improvements described in Section 8.1 (the "Proposed Improvements") are denied after the exhaustion of all administrative appeals elected to be pursued by Lessee, Lessee may terminate this Lease by delivering written notice to Lessor within thirty (30) days after such denial becomes final. Upon such termination, this Lease shall terminate without further liability of either Party except for obligations that expressly survive termination, Lessee shall surrender the Premises in accordance with Section 17, and neither Party shall be deemed in default by reason of such termination.

SECTION 4
RENT

4.1 Rent Offset. Lessee shall be entitled to offset the Rent amount otherwise due and payable in accordance with Section 4.2 hereof up to the amount of $304,063, which is the estimated cost of the Lessee Improvements (the “Rent Offset”), applied as follows and detailed in the Rent Table below:
(a) Months 1 Through 24. One hundred percent (100%) of the Rent otherwise due and payable each month shall be applied against the Rent Offset, and no monthly Rent payment shall be due from Lessee during this period.
(b) Months 25 Through 36. Lessee shall pay to Lessor twenty-five percent (25%) of the Rent otherwise due and payable each month, and the remaining seventy-five percent (75%) shall be applied against the remaining balance of the Rent Offset.

5 | P a g e
V 1 4
(c) Months 37 Through 48. Lessee shall pay to Lessor fifty percent (50%) of the Rent otherwise due and payable each month, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) shall be applied against the remaining balance of the Rent Offset. (d) Months 49 Through 60. Lessee shall pay to Lessor seventy-five percent (75%) of the Rent otherwise due and payable each month, and the remaining twenty-five percent (25%) shall be applied against the remaining balance of the Rent Offset. (e) From and After the Rent Adjustment Date. From and after the Rent Adjustment Date, and for the remainder of the Lease Term, Lessee shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the Rent in accordance with the Rent Schedule described in paragraph

4.2, below.

Rent Table
Years Month to Month Monthly
Credit
%
Monthly
Credit $
Monthly
Rent Due
Rent Credit
Value
1-2 Month 1 to Month 24 100% $(7,239.58) $0 $(173,749.92) 3 Month 25 to Month 36 75% $(5,429.69) $1,809.90 $(65,156.22) 4 Month 37 to Month 48 50% $(3,619.79) $3,619.79 $(43,437.48) 5 Month 49 to Month 60 25% $(1,809.90) $5,429.69 $(21,718.74) 6 Month 61 to Month 72 0% $0 $7,239.58 -
7 Month 73 to Month 84 0% $0 $7,239.58 -
8-10 Month 85 to Month 120 0% $0 Previous
Year’s
Monthly
Base Rent
plus CPI
-
(f) All Rent amounts applied against the Rent Offset pursuant to subsections (a) through (d) above shall be credited toward the Rent Offset for the Lessee Improvements.

In no event shall the aggregate amounts applied against the Rent Offset exceed $304,063.

If the Rent Offset is exhausted prior to the expiration of any period described above, Lessee shall thereafter pay one hundred percent (100%) of the Rent in accordance with paragraph

4.2, below.

4.2 Rent Schedule. From and after the Rent Adjustment Date, Lessee shall pay monthly Base Rent in the amount of $7,239.58 triple net, (which amount represents the fair market rental value of the Premises). The Rent amount shall increase annually on the anniversary of the Lease Commencement Date based upon the increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the San Francisco/Oakland/Hayward Area for the remainder of the Term (including any approved option to extend).

6 | P a g e
V 1 4

4.3 Security Deposit. Lessee shall pay a security deposit equal to first month’s rent, or $7,239.58.

7 | P a g e
V 1 4
SECTION 5
USE

5.1 Subject to the approval of all necessary Entitlements, the Premises may be used by Lessee for the design, development, construction, and operation of a proposed restaurant and bar.

Lessee may change the use of the Premises to any other lawful purpose, subject to the prior written approval by the City in its sole discretion. Lessee’s use of the Premises is subject to the California State Lands Commission Public Trust Doctrine.

SECTION 6

COMMON AREAS

6.1 Lessee shall be required to pay Common Area Maintenance Fees to the City for maintenance and repair of the sidewalks and improvements immediately surrounding the Premises as described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Common Area”). Said fees shall be calculated by the City using standard methodology applicable to such Common Area Maintenance Fees for the Common Area. The base line annual Common Area Maintenance Fee is estimated at $1,130 per year. Lessee shall not be entitled to a rent offset for the payment of Common Area Maintenance Fees.

SECTION 7

MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS

7.1 Lessee is leasing the Premises in “as-is” condition and Lessor is making no warranties expressed or implied about the condition of the Premises or the improvements on the Premises. Lessee shall maintain the Premises and all improvements located thereon, including but not limited to all portions of the original Building, which if approved will be rehabilitated with the Lessee Improvements. Lessee shall maintain, repair, and, as necessary, replace, all elements of the Premises, the Building, and thereafter, if approved, the Lessee Improvements, including but not limited to, the structural and other elements and interior and exterior surfaces of the Building and thereafter, if approved, Lessee Improvements, including roof, roof membrane, and roof covering, walls, ceiling, doors, windows, concrete slab, footings, underground or otherwise unexposed plumbing and electrical systems, and the heating, ventilating and air-conditioning system ("HVAC") at Lessee’s sole cost and expense. Lessee shall also be responsible for all other improvements located on or serving the Premises, including all landscaping, irrigation, utility service and connections, etc. It being expressly understood that City shall have no responsibility whatsoever for maintenance, repair, or replacement of any improvements of any nature whatsoever located on the Premises or of any portion of the Premises or the Common Area during the Term hereof. Common Area shall be maintained in accordance with Section 6 hereof.

8 | P a g e
V 1 4
SECTION 8

LESSEE IMPROVEMENTS

8.1 Lessee proposes certain improvements to the Premises consisting of a restaurant and bar (the “Proposed Improvements”), to be built in accordance with detailed plans and specifications prepared by Lessee and approved by City, in accordance with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, ordinances and requirements, including the Vallejo Waterfront Planned Development Master Plan and Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time (“PDMP”), and the City’s General Plan 2040, as amended from time to time. Upon approval by the City Council pursuant to the Entitlements as described in this Section 8, the Proposed Improvements, or such portion thereof as are so approved, shall constitute the “Lessee Improvements” as defined in Section 1.1.

8.2 City shall not be responsible for any payment of costs associated with the Lessee Improvements.

8.3 Lessee acknowledges that City retains full and complete discretion as to whether to approve any proposed future applications, including applications for the Proposed Improvements.

Accordingly, any action taken by the City (e.g., approval, conditional approval, denial) in the exercise of its discretion relating to any analysis of any proposed plan or development project required by CEQA, or any future application for a permit or approval required to develop the Premises shall not constitute an event of default of this Lease by City.

8.4 By execution of this Lease, City is not committing itself to, nor agreeing to, undertake approval of any proposed future applications, including applications for the Proposed Improvements or any other act or activity requiring the subsequent independent exercise of discretion by the City. This Lease shall not limit in any manner the discretion of City in its consideration and action on any future applications for permits or approvals for development of the Premises. Any action taken by the City in the exercise of its discretion relating to any analysis of any proposed development required by CEQA on any future application(s) for any plan, permit or approval required to develop the Premises shall not constitute an event of default or a breach of the terms of this Lease by City.

8.5 Within ninety days (90) after the Lease Commencement Date, Lessee shall submit complete Entitlement Applications necessary for the construction of the Proposed Improvements.

Lessee shall be responsible for the cost of the processing of all necessary entitlements associated with the Lessee Improvements, including but not limited to any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review required in connection with the Lessee Improvements, which process shall be conducted by the City with Lessee’s participation, any and all Entitlements, other regulatory agency permits, grading and building permits. The Parties’ timeline shall be subject to extension due to force majeure events.

9 | P a g e
V 1 4

8.6 Prior to the issuance of building permits, Lessee shall provide Lessor, at Lessee’s sole cost and expense, and shall cause its contractor to provide Lessor, at the contractor’s sole cost and expense, separate lien, performance, and payment completion bonds in an amount equal to one hundred and twenty percent (120%) of the estimated cost of Lessee’s construction contract amount to insure Lessor, the Premises and the Property against any liability for mechanic’s and materialmen’s liens, and to ensure completion of the work and payment of any contractors or subcontractors.

SECTION 9
TAXES

9.1 Notice is hereby given pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 107.6, that the interest granted to Lessee pursuant to this Lease to occupy the Premises may create a possessory interest in Lessee subject to property taxation and Lessee may by subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. Lessee shall be responsible for paying any possessory interest tax and special tax assessments in connection with Lessee’s development, occupancy and possession of the Premises and Lessee’s Improvements and for any business personal property taxes on its personal property located on the Premises.

SECTION 10

SERVICES AND UTILITIES

10.1 Lessor shall provide separate meters for all of Lessee’s required utility services and shall provide a separate fire sprinkler riser. Lessee shall pay for all utility hookup fees and permits. The Lessee shall be responsible for the cost of all utilities, including water, heat, gas, electricity, waste removal, sewers, and other utilities or services supplied to the Premises, and the Lessee shall pay or cause utility costs to be paid currently and as due. All common area utilities shall be separately metered and billed back to Lessee.

10.2 Lessee shall keep the Premises and Common Area reasonably clean and free from rubbish, trash, and garbage, and at its own expense, arrange for removal of same.

SECTION 11

SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS

11.1 Lessee’s signage shall follow the design guidelines as set forth in the PDMP and Vallejo Municipal Code, as applicable.

10 | P a g e
V 1 4
SECTION 12

ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING

12.1 Lessee shall not have the right to sublet or assign all or a part of the Premises at any time without Lessor’s prior written consent.

SECTION 13

INSURANCE

13.1 Required Insurance Coverage.
(a) Commercial Property Coverage. The Lessee shall keep the Premises and Lessee Improvements insured against loss or damage by a standard commercial property special form policy in amounts not less than the replacement value of the Lessee Improvements. The amount of such insurance shall be adjusted by reappraisal of the Lessee Improvements by the insurer or its designee at least once every five (5) years during the Lease Term, if requested by the Lessor. If a special form policy insuring the full replacement value of the Lessee Improvements is not reasonably and commercially available, then the Lessee shall obtain and maintain an extended coverage endorsement that ensures the full replacement value of the Lessee Improvements as soon as such coverage becomes commercially and reasonably available. The property policy shall provide for losses to be payable to the Lessor and Lessee as their interests may occur and that the insurer shall not have rights of recovery against the Lessor and Lessee.
(b) Liability and Property Damage Insurance. The Lessee shall at all times during the Term of this Lease keep in full force and effect a policy or policies of commercial general liability insurance against liability for bodily injury to or death of any person or property damage arising out of or in any way related to the operation, use, occupancy, or development or construction upon the Premises and on any occurrence on or about the Lessee Improvements. The Lessee shall maintain Commercial General Liability insurance coverage with a limit of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

11 | P a g e
V 1 4
(c) Workers' Compensation Insurance. The Lessee shall carry or cause to be carried workers' compensation insurance, with statutory limits as required by the California Labor Code, covering all persons employed by the Lessee in connection with the Premises/and or Lessee Improvements which shall provide for a waiver of subrogation in favor of the Lessor. Such coverage shall include a waiver of subrogation endorsement in favor of Lessor.
(d) Builders' Risk Insurance. During the course of any alteration, construction or reconstruction, the cost of which exceeds Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), the Lessee shall provide and require any contractor to provide builders' risk insurance for one hundred percent (100%) completed value on the insurable part of the Lessee Improvements. The builder's risk policy shall provide for losses to be payable to the Lessor and Lessee as their interests may occur and that the insurer shall not have rights of recovery against the Lessor and Lessee.
(e) Contractor Insurance. All contractors employed by Lessee to perform construction work on the Lessee Improvements, regardless of the value of such construction, shall carry commercial general liability insurance, worker’s compensation insurance and automobile insurance as required pursuant to this Section 13.1 and

13.2 and shall name Lessor and Lessee as additional insureds with endorsements in a form acceptable to Lessor.
(f) Automobile Insurance. If the Lessee and its contractors and agents own, use, or lease vehicles, then the Lessee shall carry or caused to be carried comprehensive automobile liability insurance with limits not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) per occurrence/Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) aggregate for bodily injury and property damage, including coverages for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, as applicable.

13.2 Insurance Policies and Premiums.
(a) All liability policies required by this Lease, including without limitation all policies obtained by Lessee's contractors pursuant to Section 13.1 above, shall name the Lessor and Lessor’s elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers, guests, invitees and contractors as additional insureds, and shall provide cross liability among insureds, and state that as to claims related to the work performed or related to the Premises, the Lessee Improvement or any and all activity permitted pursuant to this Lease, the insurance shall be primary as to the additional insureds under this Lease, so that any other policies held by the Lessor, if any, shall not contribute to any loss under the insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as coverage set forth in ISO 20 10 11 85 endorsement.

12 | P a g e
V 1 4
(b) Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a current Best Rating of no less than A:VII.

If at any time the Best Rating of Lessee’s insurer falls below A:VII, the Lessee shall have 30 days to secure a new insurer who satisfies a Best Rating of A:VII. Any deductible or self-insured retention shall be disclosed to and approved, in writing, by the Lessor.
(c) Upon execution of this Lease, the Lessee shall furnish the Lessor with certificates and original endorsements effecting the required coverage in a form acceptable to Lessor.

Thereafter, such evidence shall be provided annually or, if, and when, there are changes of insurance and, in any event, promptly upon request. The endorsements shall be signed by persons authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements shall be on forms provided by the Lessor or as approved by the Lessor.

If the Lessee does not keep all required insurance policies in full force and effect, or such insurance does not satisfy the terms and conditions of this Lease, then the Lessor may, in addition to other remedies under this Lease, take out the necessary insurance, and the Lessee shall pay the cost of such insurance within ten (10) days of invoice from Lessor. All insurance required by this section shall provide for severability of interests and shall provide that an act or omission of one of the named insureds shall not reduce or avoid coverage to the other named insureds.
(d) Each policy of insurance required pursuant to this Lease shall provide that it may not be cancelled, reduced in amount of coverage, or otherwise materially modified without notice, in writing, delivered to Lessee and the Lessor at their respective principal offices at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of change or cancellation.

13.3 Proceeds of Insurance.
(a) In the event of damage or destruction to the Premises and/or the Lessee Improvements, all commercial property insurance (including builder's risk) proceeds shall be applied to the payment of the costs of repairing or rebuilding that part of the Premises and Lessee Improvements damaged or destroyed, provided that the extent of Lessee's obligation to restore the Premises and Lessee Improvements shall be limited to the amount of the insurance proceeds.
(b) All insurance proceeds received under the policies set forth in this section shall be paid to the parties hereto in proportion to their interests, provided that the Lessee shall apply such proceeds, to the extent possible, to reconstruction or repair in a manner consistent with the provisions of Section 13.3 (a), above.
(c) If the Lessee Improvements are damaged or destroyed, then Lessee shall, to the extent insured, or required to be insured, and with reasonable diligence, repair, reconstruct or

13 | P a g e
V 1 4
replace such Lessee Improvements (to the extent the same is commercially feasible) to a condition substantially similar to their condition immediately prior to such damage or destruction. All such repair, reconstruction or replacements shall be at the sole cost and expense of Lessee and, upon completion thereof, shall be free and clear of all mechanics’ liens.

SECTION 14

INDEMNIFICATION

14.1 Except to the extent caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor, Lessee agrees to and shall indemnify, defend, and hold the Lessor, its council members, officers, agents, consultants, employees and representatives harmless from liability for claims, damages, liabilities and costs, for anything whatsoever, including but not limited to personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from (a) the demolition of the original building, the design and/or construction of the Proposed Improvement or Lessee Improvements, as applicable, and the conduct occurring on and management of the Premises or of any business therein, or any work or thing whatsoever done, or any condition created in or about the Premises during the Term; (b) any negligence, willful misconduct, act, error or omission of Lessee, Lessees, officials, officers, agents, board members, employees, agents, volunteers, consultants, contractors, representatives, invitees, guests, tenants, sublessees or any party using any portion of the Premises or the Lessee Improvements; (c) any accident, injury, or damage whatsoever occurring in or at the Premises and Lessee Improvements; (d) any breach or default by Lessee of the Lease or activity permitted pursuant to this Lease; and (e) any liens or encumbrances arising out of any work performed or materials furnished by or for Lessee.

SECTION 15

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

15.1 Compliance with Law. Lessee shall, at its sole cost and expense, comply with all applicable federal, state, regional, and local laws, regulations, ordinances, permits, and governmental orders relating to Hazardous Materials, including, without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. §9601 et seq.), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. §6901 et seq.), the California Hazardous Waste Control Law (Health & Safety Code §25100 et seq.), the CarpenterPresley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act (Health & Safety Code §25300 et seq.) and all regulations adopted pursuant thereto, as each may be amended from time to time.

14 | P a g e
V 1 4

15.2 Prohibition. Except for ordinary quantities of cleaning supplies, food preparation products, fuels, lubricants, and other materials customarily used in the lawful operation of a restaurant and stored, handled, and disposed of in compliance with all applicable laws ("Permitted Hazardous Materials"), Lessee shall not cause or permit any Hazardous Materials to be generated, manufactured, processed, stored, treated, released, discharged, disposed of, transported, or otherwise located on, under, or about the Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor, which consent may be withheld in Lessor's sole discretion.

15.3 No Contamination. Lessee shall not cause or permit any release, spill, discharge, migration, or disposal of Hazardous Materials upon, beneath, or from the Premises or any adjacent property. Lessee shall immediately notify Lessor of any actual or suspected release of Hazardous Materials affecting the Premises.

15.4 Remediation. If any Hazardous Materials are released, discharged, or otherwise contaminate the Premises or surrounding property as a result of the acts or omissions of Lessee or its employees, contractors, agents, invitees, licensees, subtenants, or customers, Lessee shall promptly investigate, remediate, and restore the affected property at its sole cost and expense in accordance with all applicable governmental requirements and to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory agencies and Lessor.

15.5 Inspection. Lessor shall have the right, upon reasonable notice (except in the event of an emergency), to inspect the Premises for compliance with this Section and to require Lessee to provide copies of any environmental reports, permits, manifests, notices, correspondence with regulatory agencies, or other environmental records relating to the Premises.

15.6 Environmental Indemnity. In addition to the indemnification obligations contained elsewhere in this Lease, Lessee shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Lessor, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, penalties, response costs, remediation costs, natural resource damages, fines, judgments, losses, expenses, and attorneys' fees arising out of or relating to (i) any release or threatened release of Hazardous Materials caused by Lessee or any person acting under or through Lessee, (ii) Lessee's violation of environmental laws, or (iii) the transportation, storage, handling, use, or disposal of Hazardous Materials by Lessee.

The obligations contained in this Section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease.

15.7 Definition. For purposes of this Lease, "Hazardous Materials" means any hazardous substance, hazardous waste, toxic substance, pollutant, contaminant, petroleum or petroleum products, asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, mold requiring remediation under applicable law, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), per- and polyfluoroalkyl

15 | P a g e
V 1 4
substances (PFAS) regulated under applicable law, or any other material regulated by any environmental law.

16 | P a g e
V 1 4
SECTION 16

HOLDING OVER

16. If Lessee remains in possession of the Premises after the expiration of the Term, then Lessee shall be deemed to be occupying the Premises as a Lessee at sufferance subject to all conditions, provisions, and obligations of the Lease.

SECTION 17

SURRENDER CONDITIONS

17. On expiration or termination of the lease, Lessee shall surrender the Premises to Lessor in reasonable order, condition, and repair.

SECTION 18

NON-DISCRIMINATION

18. Lessee shall refrain from restricting the use of the Premises on the basis of age, sex, disability, marital status, race, color, religion, creed, ancestry, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, veteran status, or national origin of any person.

SECTION 19

FORCE MAJEURE

19. Force Majeure. If either party shall be delayed or prevented from the performance of any act required by this Lease by reason of acts of God, acts of the public enemy, war, terrorism, strikes, lockouts, labor troubles, inability to secure materials, restrictive governmental laws or regulations, or other cause, without fault and beyond the reasonable control of the party obligated (financial inability excepted), performance of such act shall be excused for the period of the delay; and the period for the performance of any such act shall be extended for a period equivalent to the period of such delay.

17 | P a g e
V 1 4
SECTION 20

LEGAL EFFECT

20. Subject to the notice and cure provisions of Section 21, all obligations of Lessee are expressly made conditions of this Lease, any breach of which shall, at the option of Lessor, terminate this Lease.

SECTION 21

DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES

21. Events of Default; Remedy for Default by Lessee.
(a) Any one or more of the following events shall constitute an “Event of Default”:
(i) Failure of the Lessee to observe and perform any other covenant, condition, or agreement hereunder on its part to be performed, and continuance of such failure for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt by the Lessee of written notice specifying the nature of such default. If Lessee reasonably believes that more than thirty (30) days are required to remedy the violation, Lessee shall provide Lessor with a written notice stating the action proposed to remedy the violation and the reason why such remedy will require more than thirty (30) days. The Lessee shall also include in this written notice the soonest reasonable date by which the violation will be remedied. The Lessor shall not unreasonably withhold an additional period of up to thirty (30) additional days for Lessee to remedy the violation at issue. The Lessee may further seek to extend this period for an additional period of time, but the decision of whether or not to grant the request shall rest with the sole and absolute discretion of the City Council; or (ii) Failure to make any payment required hereunder, and continuance of such failure for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt by the Lessee of written notice specifying the nonpayment; or
(iii) Attachment, execution, or other judicial seizure of this leasehold, which is not dismissed, bonded, or stayed within sixty (60) days; or (iv) Lessee’s provision of written notice to Lessor that it has, or will, abandon the Premises and cease to utilize the Premises in accordance with Section 5, above. (b) Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under this Lease by Lessee, Lessor is entitled at Lessor's option to the following:

18 | P a g e
V 1 4
(i) to reenter and take exclusive possession of the Premises; (ii) to collect immediately the present value of the unpaid rent reserved for the entire term, or to collect each installment of rent as it becomes due; (iii) to continue this Lease in force or to terminate it at any time; (iv) to relet the Premises for any period on Lessee's account and at Lessee's expense, including real estate commissions actually paid, and to apply the proceeds received during the balance of Term to Lessee's continuing obligations under this Lease; (v) in accordance with applicable law (e.g., Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. § 1993 et seq.), to take custody of all personal property on the Premises to dispose of the personal property and to apply the proceeds from any sale of that property to Lessee's obligations under this Lease;
(vi) to recover from Lessee the damages described in Civil Code § 1951.2(a)(1), 1951.2(a)(2), 1951.2(a)(3), and 1951.2(a)(4), the provisions of which are expressly made a part of this Lease;
(vii) to restore the Premises to the same condition as received by Lessee, or to alter the Premises to make them suitable for reletting, all at Lessee's expense; and (viii) to enforce by suit or otherwise all obligations of Lessee under this Lease and to recover from Lessee all remedies now or later allowed by law.

Any act that Lessor is entitled to do in exercise of Lessor's rights upon an Event of Default may be done at a time and in a manner deemed reasonable by Lessor in Lessor's sole discretion.

SECTION 22

NOTICES

22.1 All notices or instruments required to be given or delivered hereunder or by applicable law shall be in writing and shall be effective upon receipt thereof and shall be by personal service or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to:

If to Lessor:

City Manager
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
With a copy to the:

19 | P a g e
V 1 4
City Attorney
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
and to the:

City Clerk
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
If to Lessee:

Wendy C. Stevenson
c/o Urban Fusions LLC
406 Virginia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
(707) 486-2359
[email protected]
A party may change its address for receiving notices by giving written notice of such change to the other party in accordance with this section.

SECTION 23
WAIVER

23.1 Any waiver given hereunder by Lessor must be in writing and shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition herein waived. The subsequent acceptance of rent hereunder by Lessor shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding breach by Lessee of any term, covenant, or condition of this Lease, other than the failure of Lessee to pay the particular rent so accepted, irrespective of Lessor’s knowledge of such preceding breach at the time of the acceptance of such rent. The failure of Lessor to enforce a provision of this Lease shall not be deemed a waiver for any purpose.

SECTION 24

GOVERNING LAW

24. This Lease shall in all respects be governed by the law of the State of California.

Litigation arising out of or connected with this Lease shall be instituted and maintained in the courts of Solano County in the State of California or in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Sacramento, California, and the Parties consent to jurisdiction over their

20 | P a g e
V 1 4
person and over the subject matter of any such litigation in such courts, and consent to service of process issued by such courts.

SECTION 25

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

25.1 Entire Agreement; Modification. This Lease constitutes the entire agreement between Lessor and Lessee with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior offers and negotiations, oral and written, pertaining to the Premises. This Lease may only be modified by an instrument in writing signed by Lessor and Lessee.

SECTION 26

INSPECTION BY CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST

26.1 Lessor discloses that the Premises have not undergone inspection by a Certified Access Specialist.

California Civil Code Section 1938 subsection (e) provides: “A Certified Access Specialist (CASp) can inspect the subject premises and determine whether the subject premises comply with all of the applicable construction-related accessibility standards under state law. Although state law does not require a CASp inspection of the subject premises, the commercial property owner or lessor may not prohibit the lessee or tenant from obtaining a CASp inspection of the subject premises for the occupancy or potential occupancy of the lessee or tenant, if requested by lessee or tenant. The parties shall mutually agree on the arrangements for the time and manner of the CASp inspection, the payment of the fee for the CASp inspection, and the cost of making and repairs necessary to correct violations of construction-related accessibility standards within the premises.”
If Lessee wishes to have the Premises inspected by a CASp: (i) the inspection will be at Lessee’s sole cost and expense; (ii) any repairs or modifications necessary to correct any violation of construction-related accessibility standards that is noted in the CASp report shall be Lessee’s responsibility; and (iii) Lessee must provide a copy of the CASp report to Lessor on completion.

21 | P a g e
V 1 4
SECTION 27

PREVAILING WAGES

27. Lessee acknowledges that Lessor has made no representation, express or implied, to Lessee or any person associated with Lessee regarding whether or not laborers employed relative to any construction on the Premises must be paid the prevailing per diem wage rate for their labor classification, as determined by the State of California, pursuant to California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. Lessee agrees with Lessor that Lessee shall assume the responsibility and be solely responsible for determining whether or not laborers employed relative to any construction on the Premises undertaken by Lessee must be paid the prevailing per diem wage rate for their labor classification, as determined by the State of California, pursuant to California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. Lessor shall not be under any duty to monitor or ensure the compliance of Lessee with any State of California labor laws, including, without limitation, prevailing wage laws. Lessee shall indemnify Lessor in accordance with the provisions of Section 14 against any claims pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1781 arising from Lessee’s construction of any improvements, work, or alterations on the Premises.

SECTION 28

CITY MUNICIPAL POWERS

28. The Lessor is entering into this Lease in its proprietary capacity, and not in its regulatory or governmental capacity. Nothing in this Lease shall be construed as restraining, impairing, or restricting the City in its regulatory capacity, or granting any rights upon the Lessee with respect to the use, occupancy or operation of the Premises in a manner inconsistent with Law.

This Lease does not grant any development rights upon the Lessee with respect to the Premises and any such development shall be subject to all applicable provisions of the Vallejo Municipal Code.
[Signatures on the following page]

22 | P a g e
V 1 4
BY SIGNING BELOW, the Parties confirm their agreement to the terms of this Lease as of the date first written above.

ATTEST: LESSOR:
______________________ City of Vallejo
City Clerk
By: ____________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Its: ____________________________________ _______________________
City Attorney LESSEE:

Urban Fusions, LLC
By: ____________________________________
Its: ____________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
Lessee's Attorney
NOTE: ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED FOR RECORDATION PURPOSES

23 | P a g e
V 1 4
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of _________________________ )
On ____________________, 2026, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared _________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of _________________________ )
On ____________________, 2026, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared _________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

1 | P a g e
V 1 4

EXHIBIT A
Legal description of Premises
The land described herein is situated in the State of California, County of Solano, City of Vallejo, described as follows:

Parcel A as shown on parcel map filed October 7, 1974, in Book 8 of Parcel Maps 93, Solano County Records, and further described as follows:

Being a portion of Parcel 613 as said parcel is shown on that certain parcel map recorded August 3, 1967 in Book 2 of Parcel Maps, Page 1, Instrument No, 12847, Solano County Records; also being a portion of the Marina Vista Project as shown on that certain map entitled "Map of the Marina Vista Project, City of Vallejo, Solano County, California, etc." filed for record February 1, 1967 in Book 23 of Maps, Page 51, Instrument No. 1907, Solano County Records, bounded and more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Marina Vista Project hereinabove referred to; thence South 32°37'13" East, 2,507.09 feet along the U.S. Pierhead and Bulkhead Line as shown on said map of the Marina Vista Project to the true point of beginning, said point also being the Northwesterly corner of Parcel 613 hereinabove referred to; thence along the Northerly and Easterly boundary of said Parcel 613, the following courses and distances: North 57°22'47" East, 140.00 feet, South 32°37'13" East, 30.00 feet; South 59°14'28" West, 6.79 feet and South 30°45'30" East, 137.38 feet; thence South 57°22'47" West, 128.75 feet to a point on the Westerly boundary of said parcel 613, said point also lying on said U.S Pierhead and Bulkhead Line; thence along said line North 32°37'13" West, 167.09 feet to the true point of beginning.

APN: 0055-170-400

2 | P a g e
V 1 4

EXHIBIT B

ACTION ITEM 9.A.

DATE: October 13, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Leonard Bradley Job, P.E., Public Works Director
SUBJECT: RECEIVE A PROJECT COST AND SCOPE UPDATE ON THE VALLEJO COMMUNITY

SAFETY CENTER PROJECT AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING

PROJECT AFFORDABILITY, SCOPE, AND NEXT STEPS

RECOMMENDATION
Receive an update on the current cost, scope, and schedule of the Vallejo Community Safety Center (VCSC) project and provide direction to staff on how to proceed, including: 1) whether to pursue scope reductions, value engineering, an alternative reduced-footprint site concept, or a pause in further design work pending identification of a viable funding plan; and 2) whether to evaluate alternative project delivery methods for the next phase of the project.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
On August 4, 2026, the City Council adopted a resolution ratifying additional design professional services performed by Indigo Hammond + Playle Architects, LLP ("Indigo"), and approved the Third Amendment to the Design Professional Services Agreement, increasing the not-to-exceed contract amount to $6,396,400. Due to time constraints at that meeting, Council did not receive the accompanying project cost and design update that had been planned. Staff is bringing this information forward now because the updated 100% Construction Documents cost estimate has grown substantially since the project was last scoped, and now significantly exceeds funding identified for the project to date. Council direction is needed before additional design or construction funding commitments are made.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Contract History
In 2018, the City of Vallejo ("City") initiated planning efforts to relocate Police Department operations to 400 Mare Island Way. In 2019, the City issued a Request for Proposals for architectural design services. On February 25, 2020, the City Council approved a Design Professional Services Agreement with Indigo in the amount of $2,962,935 to design and produce bid-ready construction documents.

On April 11, 2023, the City Council redirected the project to 111 Amador Street, the current site of the Police Headquarters and the City’s Corporation Yard. To continue the project at the new location, Indigo’s scope of services was revised and expanded, and on September 12, 2023, the Council approved a First Amendment increasing the contract to $5,634,700.

At the September 23, 2025, Council meeting, staff presented an update on the project, including the funding needed to complete the 100% design phase and potential funding sources to address a project budget shortfall. The Council directed staff to use a portion of Monsanto Settlement funds to provide an additional $746,200 in project funding, and on November 18, 2025, the Council adopted Resolution No. 25-185 approving a budget amendment and the Second Amendment to the Agreement, raising the total not-to-exceed amount to $6,380,900. The Second Amendment’s added scope included an alternative facility options study ($45,000), a revised building renovation scope ($445,000), LEED Gold certification efforts ($196,200), and development application and design review ($60,000).

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: RECEIVE A PROJECT COST AND SCOPE UPDATE ON THE VALLEJO COMMUNITY

SAFETY CENTER PROJECT AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING

PROJECT AFFORDABILITY, SCOPE, AND NEXT STEPS

The Third Amendment, ratified on August 4, 2026, added $15,500 for design work related to a taller, longer perimeter security wall at the Police Department’s temporary dispatch facility. This work was requested by Police Department dispatch personnel to address safety and security concerns, was authorized by City staff and completed to the City’s satisfaction, but was performed before a formal contract amendment was executed. Ratification allowed the City to compensate Indigo for the completed work and bring the Agreement into conformance with the actual scope performed.

Current Site Conditions
The Police Department and the City’s Corporation Yard both currently operate out of the 111 Amador Street property. The Police Headquarters occupies a 1.1-acre site with a 19,200-square-foot, 65-year-old building that has significant operational and infrastructure shortcomings. The adjacent 4.3-acre Corporation Yard contains 30,800 square feet of similarly aged structures that constrain the City’s programmatic needs for yard storage, covered storage, vehicle maintenance, and management of operations.

Base Project Scope
As currently designed, the VCSC project relocates the Corporation Yard to a new, as-yet-undetermined site and expands the Police Department across the full 5.4-acre 111 Amador Street property. The base design includes approximately 89,000 square feet of new facilities: a three-story, 68,000-square-foot main Community Safety Center building housing the Emergency Operations Center, community meeting space, police training facilities, and the 911 dispatch call center, plus 21,100 square feet of supporting site buildings. Estimated construction duration is 34 months, with estimated annual operations and maintenance costs of $1.8 million to $2.4 million.

Project Cost Update
The 100% Construction Documents cost estimate, prepared by Indigo’s construction cost estimator and dated July 21, 2026, has increased substantially from earlier project estimates. A summary of the current estimate follows.

Hazardous Materials Abatement
Item Amount Comments
Hazmat Abatement & Monitoring $200,000 Hazardous soils mitigation allowance
Monitoring $10,000 Testing and abatement oversight
Contingency (50%) $100,000 Unforeseen conditions
Total $310,000
Construction Cost
Item Amount Comments
Direct Construction Cost $82,658,600 Based on benchmark pricing, prepared by Indigo 7/21/2026

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: RECEIVE A PROJECT COST AND SCOPE UPDATE ON THE VALLEJO COMMUNITY

SAFETY CENTER PROJECT AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING

PROJECT AFFORDABILITY, SCOPE, AND NEXT STEPS

General Conditions (6.5%) $5,372,809 Based on benchmark pricing General Requirements $0 Assumed included in General Conditions Escalation and Design Contingency $8,654,900 Estimated escalation, 11/24 to 7/26 General Contractor Contingencies Not included Typical benchmark is 1.5%-2% Payment & Performance Bond
(1.34%)
$1,107,625 Benchmark range 0.5%-1.9%
General Contractor Fee / Markup
(8.5%)
$7,025,981 Benchmark General Contractor range 3%-6%
Owner's Contingency (10%) $10,481,992 Change orders during construction Total Construction Cost $115,301,907
Total Project Cost
Item Amount
Construction Cost Estimate $116,000,000
Total Indirect Cost (CM&I, FF&E, special inspections, permit fees, IT and dispatch equipment)
$25,000,000
Corporation Yard Relocation and Water Infrastructure Relocation $10,000,000 - $16,000,000
Indirect Soft Cost Escalation & Contingency $4,000,000
Water & Sewer Fees, PG&E Fees, and Underground/Overhead Utility Relocation
~$1,000,000
Grand Total (Estimated Project Cost Range) $156,000,000- $162,000,000
Regional Cost Benchmarking
Staff and Indigo compared the VCSC project to 18 comparable California police and public safety facility projects completed, under construction, or in design between 2013 and 2030. At an estimated current cost of approximately $1,300 per square foot, the VCSC project falls in the middle of this comparison range, which spans roughly $330 per square foot (a tenant-improvement project in an existing Caltrans office building) to $2,580 per square foot (a new-construction essential services facility consolidating police, fire, and 911 dispatch). Projects at the high end of the range, such as Mountain View’s Police & Fire Headquarters ($193.5 million, 75,000 sf) and Palo Alto’s Public Safety Building ($135.5 million, 56,000 sf), are, like the VCSC, newPage 220 of 383 Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: RECEIVE A PROJECT COST AND SCOPE UPDATE ON THE VALLEJO COMMUNITY

SAFETY CENTER PROJECT AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING

PROJECT AFFORDABILITY, SCOPE, AND NEXT STEPS

construction essential services facilities. Lower-cost comparisons generally involve tenant improvements to existing buildings rather than new construction, or smaller facilities without a full complement of dispatch, Emergency Operations Center (EOC), and detention functions.

Scope Reduction and Value Engineering Options
Given the magnitude of the current estimate relative to identified funding, Indigo has identified a range of potential scope reductions and value engineering measures for Council’s consideration. These are presented in ascending order of programmatic impact.

Recommended Scope Reductions:

1. Delete off-site improvements from the base scope (implemented as Alternate 1): $0.1 million

2. Delete the Police Services Building, K-9 facility, and related site work from the base scope (Alternate 2): $35.9 million
Potential Major Scope Reductions:

1. Delete Level 3 of the Community Safety Center Building: $17.8 million

2. Delete two column bays from the middle of the Community Safety Center building: $16.2 million

3. Delete the mini-plaza: $2.9 million
Potential Value Engineering Reductions (combined total of approximately $3.3 million):

1. Change institutional perimeter fencing to commercial grade: $0.7 million

2. Change A/V equipment installation to roughing only: $0.6 million

3. Delete window treatments: $0.5 million

4. Change institutional wood wainscot/tile to commercial Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) and paint:
$0.4 million

5. Change institutional Luxury Vinyl Tile (LVT) and carpet to commercial sealed concrete in back areas:
$0.3 million

6. Change institutional high-density shelving to commercial fixed shelving: $0.2 million

7. Change institutional suspended ceilings to commercial grade: $0.2 million

8. Change institutional lobby/EOC/community meeting flooring to commercial grade: $0.2 million

9. Change institutional casework to commercial grade: $0.1 million

10. Change institutional dors and frames to commercial grade: $0.1 million Alternative Reduced-Footprint Concept:

Indigo has also prepared an alternative site concept that would leave a portion of the Corporation Yard in place at 111 Amador Street rather than relocating it entirely. Under this concept, 2.1 acres of the existing Corporation Yard and 0.9 acres of the existing Police Headquarters site would remain, and the new Community Safety Center would be built on a smaller 2.3-acre portion of the site, including visitor parking and a mini-plaza, with a three-story, 68,000-square-foot main building. Indigo estimates this concept would reduce construction duration to approximately 22 months (from 34 months) and would avoid the estimated $10 million to $16 million cost of relocating the Corporation Yard to a new site, along with the associated design, site development, and utility relocation costs — for a preliminary estimated total savings of approximately $36 million. This concept has not been fully designed or estimated to the same level of detail as the base scope and would require further design development if Council directs staff to pursue it.

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: RECEIVE A PROJECT COST AND SCOPE UPDATE ON THE VALLEJO COMMUNITY

SAFETY CENTER PROJECT AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING

PROJECT AFFORDABILITY, SCOPE, AND NEXT STEPS

Project Delivery Method
The VCSC has been designed to date for traditional design-bid-build delivery. Given the current cost estimate and schedule, staff recommends evaluating whether an alternative delivery method, such as design-build, construction manager at-risk, or a public-private partnership, could reduce cost, schedule, or risk to the City.

Several of the benchmark projects used alternative delivery, including Salinas (public-private partnership), Petaluma (design-build, active RFP), and Los Banos (design-build). Because VCSC design is already at the construction documents stage, some benefits of design-build may be reduced. Staff would evaluate cost, schedule, risk allocation, and the City's statutory authority for each option, and return to Council with a recommendation.

Any scope reduction will require redesign of the current construction documents, whether the project continues under design-bid-build or moves to another delivery method. The cost of that redesign is not yet known. Once Council has given direction, a final scope has been agreed to, and a delivery method has been selected, staff will return to Council with an amendment to the Indigo agreement and a related budget adjustment.

FISCAL IMPACT
The agreement with Indigo for design services is funded through the previously approved Capital Outlay and Monsanto Settlement funds allocated in November 2025. Accordingly, no additional design funding is required as part of the current action to provide direction to staff. However, if Council directs a reduction or other change to the project scope, the current construction documents will need to be revised, and the cost of that redesign is not yet known. Once Council provides direction, the final project scope is established, and a project delivery method is selected, staff will return to Council with a proposed amendment to the Indigo agreement and a corresponding budget adjustment, as necessary.

Additionally, the current estimated total project cost of $156 million to $162 million substantially exceeds the funding need identified to date for construction of the VCSC. Staff has not identified a funding source or financing plan sufficient to fund the project at its current scope. Absent Council direction to reduce the project scope, identify additional funding, or otherwise revise the project approach, staff does not recommend advancing the project to the construction funding stage.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This item is limited to receiving information and providing policy direction to staff and does not itself constitute a project approval; therefore no environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required at this time. Any future action approving a specific project scope, budget, or construction contract will be subject to CEQA review as applicable prior to that approval.

ATTACHMENTS
None

CONTACT
Leonard Bradley Job, P.E., Public Works Director (707) 648-4433 [email protected]

ACTION ITEM 9.B.

DATE: October 13, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Leonard Bradley Job, P.E., Public Works Director
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE CITY'S TWENTY-SEVEN (27) LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING A

MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS

RECOMMENDATION
Receive an update on the City’s twenty-seven (27) Landscape Maintenance Districts and provide direction to staff regarding a multi-year review of the districts.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
Staff has identified a need to conduct a comprehensive review of the City’s 27 Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) to evaluate whether existing services, maintenance responsibilities, and assessment levels are appropriate and financially sustainable. Accordingly, the City Council is requested to direct the review and authorize development of strategies to address the long-term needs and financial sustainability of each district.

The review is warranted because assessment revenues in many districts have remained largely unchanged despite significant increases in the cost of providing services and maintaining improvements. Assessments in 12 districts have not increased in more than 15 years, and assessments in eight additional districts have not increased in more than eight years. As a result, some districts have experienced reduced service levels, deferred maintenance, and declining reserve balances, which may increase long-term maintenance costs.

The goal of the review is to ensure the long-term viability of each LMD and that assessment revenues are sufficient to support appropriate service levels and long-term maintenance needs. The review will include evaluating each district, developing strategies to address identified needs, engaging affected property owners, and returning to the City Council with recommendations regarding services, maintenance, and assessments, as appropriate. Depending on the results of the review, proposed assessment increases may require approval by property owners through an assessment ballot proceeding.

The Mare Island Community Facilities District is not an LMD and is not included in this review.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The landscape maintenance districts within the City of Vallejo were established separately by City Council resolution as a special financing district to collect annual assessments from property owners within a defined geographic area to fund specified services and the maintenance of public improvements. Because each district was established independently, the districts vary significantly in size, maintenance responsibilities, service requirements, assessment levels, and financial condition. The smallest district contains approximately 10 parcels, while the largest contains approximately 3,219 parcels.

The resolution establishing each district identifies the infrastructure and improvements for which the district is responsible. These responsibilities are not uniform among the districts. For example, certain districts are responsible for maintaining roads and/or embankment stability on private property, while other districts have no such responsibilities. The City Attorney’s Office and Public Works Department are working together to

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE CITY'S TWENTY-SEVEN (27) LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING A

MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS

confirm that the City’s services and maintenance activities are consistent with the obligations established by the resolutions creating each district.

District Budgets
District finances are generally comprised of three primary components: (1) assessment revenues; (2) operating expenditures for ongoing services; and (3) rehabilitation reserve funds for long-term maintenance and capital needs.

Staff has identified several financial conditions that warrant review. In some districts, rehabilitation reserve fund balances are relatively low, limiting the district’s ability to address significant future maintenance or rehabilitation needs. This concern is particularly applicable to the Marin View Subdivision Landscape Maintenance District (Council District 4) and the Carriage Oaks Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District (Council District 2).

Staff are also concerned about the long-term viability of districts when substantial amounts of rehabilitation reserve funds are used to pay operating costs. When assessment revenues exceed operating costs, the excess is added to the rehabilitation reserve fund. Conversely, when operating expenditures exceed assessment revenues, the operating deficit is paid from the rehabilitation reserve. Although reserves can provide a source of funding during periods of higher expenditures, sustained use of reserves for operating costs reduces the funds available for future maintenance and rehabilitation. This concern is particularly applicable to the Glen Cove No. 3 Landscape and Lighting and Maintenance District (Council Districts 3 and 6) and the Hiddenbrooke Maintenance District (Council District 1).

Conversely, some districts have relatively large rehabilitation reserve fund balances. As part of the review, staff will evaluate the services provided to each district and the condition of the improvements for which the district is responsible. If deficiencies are identified, staff will evaluate projects or other measures necessary to bring the improvements into an appropriate state of repair. Staff will also evaluate whether assessment revenues provide sufficient cash flow to fund current services and long-term maintenance obligations.

Depending on the results of the review, staff may recommend adjustments to assessments, including a reduction where a district’s financial resources are greater than its reasonably anticipated needs. This concern is particularly applicable to the Cimarron Hills-Madigan Ranch Landscape Maintenance District (Council District 2), Vallejo Garthe Ranch Maintenance District (Council District 3), and Northeast Quadrant Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (Non-Zone A) (Council District 1).

Staff has also received requests from individual residents or groups of residents for significant projects or numerous smaller projects within certain districts. As steward of the LMDs, the City is responsible for establishing maintenance activities and priorities necessary to fulfill each district’s obligations. Staff will consider resident requests for work that falls within a district’s responsibilities; however, requests may be deferred or declined when staff determines that the requested work would adversely affect the district’s financial condition or long-term viability, is inconsistent with the district’s obligations or priorities, or would require an increase in assessments. This concern is particularly applicable to the Costa Del Rio Street and Landscape Maintenance District (Council District 6).

Based on these financial and operational considerations, staff will initially focus its review on the eight districts identified above.

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE CITY'S TWENTY-SEVEN (27) LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING A

MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS

Review Process
The goal of the review is to conduct a multi-year, top-down review of all 27 districts to determine whether the services, maintenance responsibilities, and assessment levels are appropriate for each district and support the district’s long-term sustainability.

The Public Works Department is working to ensure that the City provides the services and performs the asset maintenance required by the resolutions establishing each district.

The review of each LMD will include:
• Confirming the district’s legal and maintenance responsibilities; • Establishing appropriate maintenance standards and service frequencies; • Identifying deferred maintenance and existing deficiencies; • Estimating the costs necessary to bring district improvements into an appropriate state of repair; • Developing a 20-year capital improvement plan for long-term maintenance and rehabilitation needs; and
• Calculating projected cash flow and assessment revenues necessary to fund current services and long-term maintenance obligations.

Following completion of each district review, staff will develop recommendations regarding the appropriate level of services, maintenance activities, reserve funding, and assessments. Recommendations may include maintaining existing service levels and assessments or proposing changes to services, maintenance priorities, and/or assessments, as appropriate.

Public outreach to property owners within each district will occur after staff has developed proposed strategies for that district. The purpose of the outreach will be to explain the district’s existing responsibilities and financial condition, discuss the proposed strategies, and obtain input from affected property owners before the strategies are incorporated into the district’s Engineer’s Report.

If an assessment change requiring property-owner approval is proposed, staff will conduct the applicable notification and voting process required by law.

If property owners do not approve an assessment increase and the district is subsequently unable to fund its ongoing services and long-term maintenance obligations, the City may need to evaluate other options for maintaining the district’s responsibilities, which could include consideration of district dissolution. If a district were ultimately dissolved, responsibility for maintaining certain common areas or improvements could transfer to individual property owners or homeowners’ associations, depending on the ownership and nature of the property and improvements. The review is intended to identify sustainable options for each district and is not intended to presume that City subsidies would be necessary or appropriate.

Review of City Activities
In addition to evaluating individual districts, staff will review the City’s administration and delivery of LMD services. This review will include City staffing levels and administrative practices; City administrative and overhead costs; contractor performance; performance requirements included in City contracts; and procurement of non-landscape maintenance services, such as fence repair.

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE CITY'S TWENTY-SEVEN (27) LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING A

MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS

The purpose of this component of the review is to identify opportunities to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency of services provided to the districts and to ensure that district assessment revenues are being used appropriately to fulfill each district’s responsibilities.

Staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to 1) review the services, long-term maintenance needs, and assessments of each district; 2) develop strategies to improve the long-term viability of each district; 3) conduct public meetings for the property owners in each district after strategies are developed; 4) incorporate strategies into each district's Engineer's Report; and 5) recommend assessment changes to City Council, when appropriate.

FISCAL IMPACT
Any fiscal impact to the City’s FY2026-2027 budget will be addressed by a two-step budget adjustment that transfers funds from a district’s rehabilitation reserve fund to the district’s operating budget, when necessary.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

ATTACHMENTS
None

CONTACT
Leonard Bradley Job, P.E., Public Works Director (707) 648-4433 [email protected]

ACTION ITEM 9.C.

DATE: October 13, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kristin Pollot, AICP, Planning and Development Services Director Hector Rojas, Long-Range Planning Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE VALLEJO GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE JULY 2026 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS

GUIDELINES AND FINDING SUCH ACTION EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL

REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)

RECOMMENDATION
Hold a public hearing to consider a Resolution amending the Vallejo General Plan by adopting the July 2026 Transportation Analysis Guidelines and finding such action exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
The 2026 Transportation Analysis Guidelines establish a comprehensive framework for evaluating transportation conditions and potential transportation effects associated with future development applications.

The Guidelines distinguish between the City's review of local transportation conditions—including roadway operations, access and circulation, traffic safety, and multimodal facilities—from the evaluation of transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which, pursuant to Senate Bill 743 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, generally requires vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to be used as the primary metric for evaluating transportation impacts.

Adoption of the 2026 Transportation Analysis Guidelines would replace the City’s interim 2020 guidelines with updated VMT thresholds of significance, screening criteria, technical methodologies, and guidance regarding transportation-related mitigation. The Guidelines are intended to promote greater consistency, predictability, and efficiency in transportation review for applicants, consultants, City staff, decision-makers, and the public, while preserving the City’s ability to evaluate local roadway operations, access and circulation, traffic safety, and multimodal transportation conditions, as appropriate under applicable law and independent of whether those conditions constitute a significant transportation impact under CEQA.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Transportation studies have traditionally evaluated the effects of new development by measuring level of service (LOS). LOS describes how well a roadway or intersection operates based largely on vehicle delay and is generally expressed as a letter grade from LOS A (representing little delay) to LOS F (representing substantial congestion and delay).

Although LOS remains useful for evaluating roadway operations, its former use as a CEQA impact metric could create an unintended disincentive for infill development. Projects in established neighborhoods, downtowns, and areas near transit could be identified as having significant transportation impacts because they increased intersection delay, even when their residents, employees, or customers drove shorter distances and generated less overall automobile travel than comparable development at the edge of a community.

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE VALLEJO GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE JULY 2026 TRANSPORTATION

ANALYSIS GUIDELINES AND FINDING SUCH ACTION EXEMPT FROM

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)

Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013, changed this approach. The legislation was intended to better align transportation analysis with statewide goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, encourage infill development, support public transit and active transportation, and promote more efficient land-use patterns. In response, the State CEQA Guidelines established VMT as the metric for evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA beginning July 1, 2020. VMT measures the amount and distance of automobile travel generated by a project. By focusing on the amount of driving rather than intersection delay, VMT analysis recognizes the transportation and environmental benefits of compact, infill, and transit-supportive development.

SB 743 did not prevent cities from continuing to use LOS and other operational measures outside CEQA. The City may still evaluate roadway function, access, queues, traffic safety, and consistency with local transportation policies. The updated Guidelines therefore establish two complementary review paths: a nonCEQA Traffic Impact Analysis addressing local operational and safety concerns, and a CEQA Transportation Assessment addressing VMT and the other transportation questions contained in CEQA.

Interim Guidelines
To meet the statewide VMT implementation deadline established under SB 743, the City prepared Interim CEQA Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines in early 2020. The Interim Guidelines established initial VMT screening criteria, significance thresholds, analysis procedures, and mitigation guidance for development projects in Vallejo.

On July 14, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-096 N.C., approving the Interim Guidelines through a General Plan amendment and incorporating them into Vallejo General Plan 2040 as Exhibit A. An internal update was prepared in October 2020 but was never formally adopted, which has contributed to uncertainty regarding the standards applicable to new development projects. The Interim Guidelines have otherwise provided the City with an SB 743-compliant framework while the City gained experience applying VMT analysis and prepared a more comprehensive update.

Updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines
In August 2024, the City retained Fehr & Peers to update the City's CEQA transportation-analysis framework and prepare the July 2026 Transportation Analysis Guidelines. The consultant work focused on updating and modernizing VMT thresholds and screening criteria, technical methodologies for VMT analysis, current transportation-analysis practices, and mitigation guidance. Concurrently, the City's Public Works Department developed updated non-CEQA Traffic Impact Analysis procedures for inclusion in the same document.

The updated Guidelines are intended for use by transportation engineering and CEQA professionals and establish a uniform framework for studies prepared in connection with development review. The City may tailor the scope and methodology of an individual study based on the project's characteristics and surrounding transportation context.

Non-CEQA Traffic Impact Analysis
The first part of the updated Guidelines establishes procedures for non-CEQA Traffic Impact Analyses. These procedures were developed by the Public Works Department and are intended to help the City evaluate whether a project would affect the safe and efficient operation of the local transportation system.

The procedures establish general study triggers and provide direction for trip generation, trip distribution, study areas, traffic counts, analysis scenarios, roadway and intersection operations, access and internal circulation,

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE VALLEJO GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE JULY 2026 TRANSPORTATION

ANALYSIS GUIDELINES AND FINDING SUCH ACTION EXEMPT FROM

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)

vehicle queues, collision history, pedestrian and bicycle conditions, traffic calming, roadway adequacy, and fair-share contributions toward needed improvements. LOS remains an important consideration because General Plan Policy MTC-2.5 establishes an advisory standard of LOS E or better, considered together with pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and emergency-access performance.

CEQA Transportation Assessment
The second part of the updated Guidelines establishes procedures for analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA. It identifies VMT thresholds, screening criteria, model-based analysis procedures, cumulative-analysis methodology, and potential mitigation measures for future development projects.

The updated Guidelines establish a threshold of 15 percent below the applicable average for residential and employment projects. Residential projects would be compared with existing citywide household VMT per resident, while employment projects would be compared with existing Bay Area regional VMT per employee.

Regional retail projects would be evaluated based on whether they increase net regional VMT. Mixed-use projects would be evaluated by separating and analyzing their individual land-use components.

A project may be screened from detailed VMT modeling based on its type, location within a low-VMT area, or proximity to qualifying transit when substantial evidence does not indicate that additional analysis is necessary. Projects that do not satisfy a screening criterion would prepare a project-specific VMT analysis using the Solano-Napa Activity-Based Model or another methodology approved by the City.

Summary of Principal Changes
Compared with the Interim Guidelines, the updated Guidelines provide a more comprehensive transportationreview framework by clearly separating non-CEQA analysis of roadway operations, safety, access, queues, and multimodal conditions from CEQA analysis of VMT. They also revise the City's VMT thresholds and screening criteria, including locally supported screening for small projects, local-serving uses, projects in lowVMT areas, and qualifying projects near transit. Finally, they provide more detailed direction for baseline, project, and cumulative VMT analysis and incorporate current California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) guidance regarding potential VMT-reduction measures.

Code Compliance
Vallejo Municipal Code (VMC) Chapter 17.04 establishes the City’s procedures for initiating, reviewing, noticing, hearing, recommending, and acting on amendments to the Vallejo General Plan 2040. These provisions require Planning Commission review and recommendation before the City Council takes final action on a General Plan amendment. Consistent with Government Code Sections 65353 and 65354, the Planning Commission must conduct a noticed public hearing and transmit a written recommendation to the City Council.

VMC Section 17.04.060 provides that the City may amend Vallejo General Plan 2040 when it finds that doing so is in the public interest.

Planning Commission Recommendation
On September 9, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed General Plan amendment and updated Guidelines. Following the public hearing, the Commission voted 7-0 to adopt Resolution No. PC26-16 recommending that the City Council adopt the updated Guidelines.

Staff Analysis
The proposed General Plan amendment is in the public interest because it would replace the interim 2020 framework with comprehensive and current procedures for evaluating transportation effects associated with

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE VALLEJO GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE JULY 2026 TRANSPORTATION

ANALYSIS GUIDELINES AND FINDING SUCH ACTION EXEMPT FROM

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)

future development. The update is expected to improve the consistency, transparency, predictability, and efficiency of technical review; reduce unnecessary analysis for projects that satisfy supported screening criteria; and better recognize the benefits of infill, local-serving, low-VMT, and transit-supportive development.

The amendment is consistent with and advances Vallejo General Plan 2040. The updated Guidelines support Goal MTC-2, Mobile Community, and implement Policy MTC-2.1, Safety First; Policy MTC-2.4, Citywide Mobility; Policy MTC-2.5, Street Classification System; and Policy MTC-2.7, Complete Streets. Together, these policies call for a safe and multimodal transportation network that considers pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists, and emergency access.

The updated Guidelines also support Policy MTC-2.8, Transportation Demand Management, and Actions MTC-2.8A and MTC-2.8C, which call for measures and project-level strategies that reduce VMT. They further support Policy CP-1.6, Active Transportation Network, and Action CP-1.6D, which directs the City to develop guidelines for public and private projects that promote safe, convenient, and attractive bicycle and pedestrian facilities. By recognizing lower-VMT development and transportation-efficient locations, the Guidelines also advance Policy NBE-2.7, Jobs-Housing Balance; Policy NBE-2.8 and Action NBE-2.8A, which promote compatible infill development; and General Plan objectives to focus development near transit and expand alternatives to automobile travel.

The General Plan will remain internally consistent following the amendment because the action would replace an existing transportation-analysis exhibit with an updated exhibit addressing the same subject. It would not amend the General Plan land-use map, change permitted uses or densities, increase development capacity, or modify the General Plan's growth assumptions. The update would strengthen the City's ability to evaluate roadway operations, safety, multimodal conditions, and VMT without authorizing development or reducing existing health and safety protections.

Notice and Public Comments
In accordance with Government Code Sections 65090 and 65355 and applicable provisions of the VMC, notice of the October 13, 2026 City Council public hearing was mailed to persons requesting notice, electronically distributed, and published in the Times-Herald on September 22, 2026. As of preparation of this report, staff has received no public comments on this item. Any comments received after publication of this report will be provided to the City Council before or at the public hearing.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with amending the General Plan and adopting the updated Guidelines. The Guidelines establish procedures for reviewing future development applications. Staff time associated with their implementation would be absorbed within existing departmental operations, and projectspecific transportation studies would generally be prepared at the applicant's expense as part of the development-review process.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed General Plan amendment and adoption of the updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines are exempt from CEQA pursuant to the common sense exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3). Under this exemption, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed action establishes procedures, thresholds, screening criteria, and technical requirements for

Date: October 13, 2026
Subject: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE VALLEJO GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE JULY 2026 TRANSPORTATION

ANALYSIS GUIDELINES AND FINDING SUCH ACTION EXEMPT FROM

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)

evaluating transportation effects associated with future development applications. It does not approve any development project, authorize construction, modify land-use designations or development standards, increase development capacity, fund or authorize transportation improvements, or commit the City to any particular physical project. The updated Guidelines are procedural and analytical in nature and will be used to evaluate future projects based on project-specific information and substantial evidence. Accordingly, adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment and updated Guidelines will not itself result in a physical change to the environment, and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed action will have a significant effect on the environment.

In addition, future development projects and transportation improvements will remain subject to CEQA and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, based on project-specific information and substantial evidence, to determine whether additional environmental review is required. The updated Guidelines will provide a framework for evaluating transportation effects, including vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as required by CEQA, as well as other transportation considerations addressed by the Guidelines.

Accordingly, the proposed General Plan amendment and adoption of the updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines are exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), and no further environmental review is required for the proposed action.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attach1_Recommended Reso_TAG_CAO Stamp

2. Attach2_Exhibit A to Recommended Reso (July 2026 TAG)

3. Attach3_PC Reso No. 26-16 (unsigned)

4. Attach4_2020 Interim CEQA TIA Guidelines

CONTACT
Kristin Pollot, AICP, Planning & Development Services Director, (707) 648-4326 [email protected]
Hector Rojas, Long-Range Planning Manager, (707) 553-7283 [email protected]

1 RESOLUTION NO. 26-____ N.C.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO AMENDING THE VALLEJO GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE JULY 2026 TRANSPORTATION

ANALYSIS GUIDELINES AND FINDING SUCH ACTION EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL

REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
WHEREAS, the City of Vallejo has prepared updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines to establish a consistent methodology and set of requirements for evaluating the transportation effects of development projects, including roadway operations, access and circulation, safety, pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities, roadway adequacy, traffic calming, and appropriate transportation improvements and mitigation; and
WHEREAS, the updated Guidelines distinguish between non-CEQA transportation analysis, which may evaluate roadway operations, access and circulation, traffic safety, roadway adequacy, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities, and Level of Service (“LOS”), and CEQA transportation analysis, which implements Senate Bill 743 by generally using vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”) as the primary metric for evaluating transportation impacts and establishes Cityspecific VMT thresholds and screening criteria; and WHEREAS, the updated Guidelines are proposed to be incorporated into the City’s General Plan through a General Plan amendment and would supersede and replace the City’s Interim CEQA Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines adopted in July 2020 and revised in October 2020 (currently incorporated into General Plan 2040 as Exhibit A), thereby providing updated technical direction for transportation impact analysis, VMT screening, thresholds of significance, and mitigation for development and transportation projects within the City of Vallejo (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, Vallejo Municipal Code (VMC) Section 17.04.060 provides that the Vallejo General Plan 2040 may be amended when the City finds that doing so is in the public interest; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65353 requires the Planning Commission to hold at least one noticed public hearing before approving a recommendation on the amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, on September 9, 2026, after giving all public notices required by State law and the VMC, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and voted 7-0 to adopt Resolution No. PC26-16 recommending the City Council adopt the updated Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2026, notices describing the City Council’s public hearing on the updated Guidelines were mailed to all persons requesting notice pursuant to VMC Section

16.602.08, emailed to the members of the City Council, and published in a 1/8th page advertisement in the Times-Herald, a newspaper of general circulation; and

2 WHEREAS, on October 13, 2026, the City Council, after giving all public notices required by State law and the VMC, conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider and review public testimony on the updated Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED that the City Council hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

Section 1. Recitals.

The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the same are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Record.

The Record of Proceedings ("Record") upon which the City Council bases its decision includes but is not limited to: (1) the staff report, City files and records, and other documents prepared for the Project; (2) the evidence, facts, findings, and other determinations set forth in this Resolution; (3) the Vallejo General Plan 2040 and its Final Environmental Impact Report; (4) the Vallejo Municipal Code; (5) all designs, plans, studies, data and correspondence submitted to the City in connection with the Project; (6) all documentary and oral evidence received at public meetings and hearings or otherwise submitted to the City relating to the Project; and (7) all other matters of common knowledge to the City Council, including City, State, and federal laws, policies, rules, regulations, reports, records, and projections related to development within the City of Vallejo and its surrounding areas.

The location and custodian of the records is the Office of the City Clerk, 555 Santa Clara Street, Vallejo, California 94590.

Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings.

Based on the Record as described above, and all matters deemed material and relevant prior to adopting this Resolution, the City Council hereby determines that the proposed amendment to the General Plan and adoption of the updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the common sense exemption set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 14, section 15061(b)(3). Under this exemption, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

The proposed amendment and updated Guidelines establish transportation analysis policies, procedures, thresholds, screening criteria, and methodologies for evaluating future development projects. They do not approve any development project, authorize construction, modify land-use designations or development standards, increase development capacity, fund or authorize transportation improvements, or commit the City to any particular physical project.

Accordingly, the City Council finds that the proposed action will not itself result in a physical change to the environment and that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed action may have a significant effect on the environment.

The City Council further finds that adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment and updated Guidelines does not approve or authorize any future development project or transportation improvement and does not commit the City to any particular future physical change.

Future development projects and transportation improvements will remain subject to applicable

3 CEQA requirements and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, based on project-specific information and substantial evidence, to determine whether additional environmental review is required.

Based on these findings, the City Council determines that the proposed amendment to the General Plan and adoption of the updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines are exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, section 15061(b)(3), and no further environmental review is required for the proposed action.

Section 4. Findings.

In accordance with VMC Section 17.04.060 and applicable State law governing General Plan amendments, the City Council hereby makes the following findings regarding the proposed General Plan amendment adopting the updated Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.

A. The proposed General Plan amendment is in the public interest.

Facts in support: The amendment will replace the interim 2020 transportation-analysis framework with comprehensive and current procedures for evaluating transportation effects associated with future development. The updated Guidelines will provide clearer screening criteria and methodologies that will promote more consistent and appropriately scaled transportation analysis based on the characteristics of individual development projects, and thereby will improve the transparency, predictability, and efficiency of transportation review for applicants, consultants, staff, decisionmakers, and the public.

B. The proposed General Plan amendment is consistent with and advances the Vallejo General Plan 2040.

Facts in support: The updated Guidelines support Goal MTC-2, Mobile Community, and implement policies addressing transportation safety, citywide mobility, street performance, complete streets, transportation demand management, active transportation, infill development, and reduction of VMT. The updated Guidelines also support General Plan objectives to focus development near existing and planned transit facilities and expand alternatives to automobile travel.

C. The Vallejo General Plan 2040 will remain internally consistent following the amendment.

Facts in support: The amendment would remove and replace an existing transportationanalysis exhibit with an updated exhibit addressing the same subject. It will not amend the General Plan land-use map, change permitted uses or densities, increase development capacity, or modify the General Plan's growth assumptions.

D. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare.

Facts in support: The updated Guidelines will strengthen the City's ability to evaluate roadway operations, collision history, pedestrian and bicycle conditions, emergency access, VMT, and

4 feasible mitigation. They will not authorize development or reduce existing health or safety protections.

Section 5. Decision.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the findings set forth herein and the Record as a whole, the City Council hereby amends the Vallejo General Plan by adopting the July 2026 Transportation Analysis Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, and by removing and replacing the City’s Interim CEQA Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines adopted in July 2020 and revised in October 2020, currently incorporated into the Vallejo General Plan 2040 as Exhibit A.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Vallejo, State of California, on the 13th day of October 2026 by the following vote, to-wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________________

ANDREA SORCE, MAYOR
ATTEST: _________________________________________
DAWN G. ABRAHAMSON, CITY CLERK

Transportation
Analysis Guidelines
July 2026

P
Table of Contents
Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Non-CEQA Traffic Impact Analysis.............................................................................................. 1 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Study Requirement............................................................................................. 1 Trip Generation Estimates ..............................................................................................................................2 Trip Distribution Assumptions........................................................................................................................3 Study Area............................................................................................................................................................3 Analysis Procedure and Methodology .........................................................................................................3 Report Format.....................................................................................................................................................8 CEQA Transportation Assessment.............................................................................................. 9 SB 743 and the Updated CEQA Guidelines.......................................................................................................9 Can LOS Analysis Still be Conducted as Part of Development Review? ..........................................10 Congestion Management Program Compliance Changes....................................................................11 VMT Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................................11 VMT Thresholds of Significance....................................................................................................................11 Project VMT Screening...........................................................................................................................................12 VMT Screening Criteria...................................................................................................................................12 VMT Assessment for Non-Screened Development ......................................................................................27 Cumulative Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 28 Detailed VMT Forecasting Information (SNABM) ................................................................................. 30 Detailed VMT Calculation Instructions .......................................................................................................31 VMT Mitigation Measures .....................................................................................................................................33 Land Use.............................................................................................................................................................33 Trip Reduction Programs.............................................................................................................................. 34 Parking or Road Pricing/Management...................................................................................................... 35 Neighborhood Design.....................................................................................................................................36 Transit ................................................................................................................................................................ 38 Clean Vehicles and Fuels.............................................................................................................................. 38 VMT Mitigation Measure Effectiveness ............................................................................................................39 Other Environmental Considerations .................................................................................................................41

P
List of Figures
Figure 1. Small Project VMT Screening Subareas .................................................................................................. 15 Figure 2. Baseline Residential TAZ VMT Map........................................................................................................ 25 Figure 3. Baseline Employment TAZ Map............................................................................................................... 26 List of Tables
Table 1. Small Project VMT Screening Criteria ....................................................................................................... 14 Table 2: Small Project ADT Screening Thresholds.................................................................................................16 Table 3. VMT Mitigation Measure Reduction Caps..............................................................................................40

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 1
Introduction
These Transportation Analysis Guidelines
establish general transportation impact study
procedures and requirements for development
projects within the City of Vallejo. They are
designed for transportation engineering and
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
professionals because of their technical
contents. The term “guideline” is important:
the City recognizes that every project and
study context is unique. The guidelines are
intended as a checklist for study preparers to
ensure all required study items are included.

They establish a uniform approach,
methodology, and tool set to evaluate the
effects of land use decisions and related
transportation projects on the City’s
transportation system. They are not intended
to eliminate professional judgment or
creativity; however, the need for and final
scope of a TIA shall be determined by the
City of Vallejo.

The guidelines contain two sections which
describe different analyses and requirements.

The first section details the City’s
requirements related to the type of non-CEQA
traffic analysis necessary for development
projects, particularly as they relate to roadway
levels of service (LOS). The second section
details the City’s transportation analysis
requirements for CEQA projects, including the
City’s guidelines related to implementation of
Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). SB 743 shifted the
State of California’s environmental regulations
away from automobile delay and LOS to
vehicle miles traveled (VMT). However,
SB 743 does not prevent a city from
continuing to analyze delay or level of service
outside of CEQA review for other
transportation planning or analysis purposes
(i.e., general plans, impact fee programs,
corridor studies, congestion mitigation, or
ongoing network monitoring); but these
metrics may no longer constitute the sole
basis for CEQA impacts.

Non-CEQA Traffic
Impact Analysis
The City Engineer, under the authority of the
Public Works Director and recommendations
from the City Traffic Engineer, will make the
final decision on the requirement for a Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA) Study. The purpose of
the TIA Study is to identify the impacts to
traffic operations, including roadway network
LOS calculations and identify feasible solutions
to mitigate impacts of new development. The
purpose of these guidelines is to provide the
standard requirements for the preparation of a
TIA study.

Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) Study
Requirement
The City’s Public Works Department shall do
an initial assessment of the project based
upon the description and proposed land
use(s). All consulting fees to perform the TIA
study will be borne by the applicant. All studies
shall be completed consistent with the City’s
General Plan and/or Solano Transportation
Authority policies. The City may assume
responsibility for administering the consultant
agreement to perform the TIA study in certain
circumstances (to be determined by the City
at our sole discretion). In general, the
requirement for a TIA study as part of the
project review process will be based upon, but
not limited to, the following criteria:
• Any project with initial traffic generation
estimates showing that the project is likely
to add 500 or more daily trips, and/or likely
to add 100 or more trips in either peak
period to the existing circulation system,
without consideration of pass-by trip
reductions. Phased projects must be
evaluated assuming full build-out

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 2
conditions for purposes of determining the
need for a TIA.
• Any project within a 1½-mile radius of any
key intersections that currently operate at a
level of service (LOS) D or worse and
project is likely to contribute traffic and
worsen this condition.
• Any project that generates more than 40
percent of its total traffic in the form of
truck traffic using passenger car
equivalents (PCE).
• Any project that intensifies the usage,
density, or traffic generation of the site
above the level currently allowed by zoning
codes, requiring a General Plan or Zoning
Amendment.
• Modifications are required to the original
TIA that is more than three years old, or
where the increase in traffic volume as
measured by ADT, peak hour, or peak hour
of the critical movement is more than 10%.

Trip Generation Estimates

1. Trip Generation Rates: Passenger vehicle
trips shall be estimated using the rates and
methodologies outlined in Trip Generation,
latest edition, published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE). Approval
must be obtained from the Public Works
Director, City Engineer, or City Traffic
Engineer prior to using any other source to
establish project trips.

2. Trip Generation Basis: The basis of all trip
generation calculations will depend on the
type of land use proposed. The trips
generated by most commercial and
industrial uses should be based on gross
floor area. The trips generated by most
residential uses should be based on the
number of dwelling units. A basis for how
trips are established, including any
methodologies and assumptions shall be
noted in the report. An alternate basis for
estimating the project trips may be
approved and/or required by the Public
Works Director, City Engineer, or City
Traffic Engineer for certain special uses
where more appropriate and known
features of the project will result in a more
accurate estimate.

3. Unknown Trip Generation Rates: Some
unique types of development or uses may
not have rates/formulas published by ITE.

In this case, a trip generation study may be
conducted at a similar existing facility to
determine acceptable trip generation rates
to be used in the study. The type and
location of the similar existing facility and
the study methodology must be preapproved by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, or City Traffic Engineer.

4. Pass-By and Diverted-Link Trips: With
prior Public Works Director, City Engineer,
or City Traffic Engineer approval, pass-by
and/or diverted-link trips may be
calculated and used in estimating the
project-generated trips using the
procedures specified in the latest edition
of Trip Generation. The pass-by and/or
diverted-link trips must be justified by
appropriate calculations. However, the
reduced or net trips generated by the
project should not be used to analyze
project driveways and intersection(s)
immediately adjacent to the project site
(i.e., driveways and intersections in the
immediate vicinity shall be analyzed using
the full trip generation of the project).

Typically, pass-by trips are associated with
new fast-food restaurants, gas stations,
and shopping centers, etc.

5. Truck Trips: Truck trips shall be calculated
and shown separately. Peak hour
distribution of inbound and outbound
trucks shall be identified separately from
passenger cars. For light industrial,
industrial parks and warehouse uses, trip
rates contained in the latest edition of Trip
Generation shall be used. All truck trips
shall be converted into passenger car
equivalents (PCE) for intersection capacity
analysis using the following factors:
• 2-axle trucks: 2.0 PCE
• 3-axle trucks: 2.5 PCE
• 4- and more axle trucks: 3.0 PCE

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 3
Trip Distribution Assumptions
The study preparer shall specify, either
independently or in consultation with the
Public Works Department, the trip distribution
assumptions to be used in the study and have
them approved by the Department prior to
completing the study. The distribution should
be based on general socioeconomic
characteristics of the study area, location and
intensity of major trip generation and
attraction centers, trip length information,
origin-destination information (specifically for
industrial and warehouse uses) and any other
known but verifiable information. For heavy
truck related uses, where truck trips comprise
a minimum of 20 percent of the total
generated trips after converting into
passenger car equivalents, trip distribution
assumptions for truck trips should be shown
separately and presented in the report text
and figures separately. Use of the Solano Napa
Activity-Based Model (SNABM) or other
approved model may be required to establish
the project trip distribution.

Study Area
The scope of the TIA shall include at a
minimum any key intersection or roadway
segment within a one and a half (1 ½) mile
radius area from the project site. All key
intersections and roadway segments within
this study area must be analyzed to identify
impacts to capacity and LOS. The study
intersections and roadway segments should be
clearly identified for review and approval by
the Public Works Department prior to initiating
the study.

Projects located within Specific Plan areas for
which a program level Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) has been previously approved by
the city, may be allowed to use a study area
limited to the immediate vicinity of the project
to determine the need for any traffic
improvements, in addition to those already
identified in the EIR. The TIA for this type of
project must specifically identify any
differences between the project and the land
use assumed for the site in the Specific Plan
and EIR. A meeting with Public Works or
Planning Department staff will generally be
necessary to discuss the specific scope of the
study prior to preparing the study.

Analysis Procedure
and Methodology

1. Traffic Counts: Existing average daily
traffic volumes for study intersections and
roadways shall be developed from 24-
hour automatic machine counters or a
recognized traffic counting agency or
company. Existing peak period
intersection turning movement volumes
shall be developed from skilled
personnel/technician manual counts or a
recognized traffic counting agency or
company. Typical count days are Tuesday,
Wednesday, and Thursday of a typical
non-holiday work week when local schools
are in normal session. Counts taken on
holidays and the day before and after a
holiday should not be used. Days with
abnormal traffic conditions (such as rain,
construction activities, road closures, etc.)
must be avoided. Counts in the vicinity of
schools should be taken when the school
is in session and pick-up and drop-off are
occurring. New traffic counts may not be
necessary if counts are available from
another source such as traffic studies
and/or City records if they have been
obtained within the last two years and are
pre-approved for use by the Public
Works Department.

2. Peak Periods: Generally, both weekday
morning (7 a.m. to 9 a.m.) and evening (4
p.m. to 6 p.m.) peak periods should be
used in the analysis to identify traffic
impacts and any level of service problems.

In some cases, an off-peak or weekend
period may be required as directed and
approved by the Public Works Director,
City Engineer, or City Traffic Engineer. The
peak hours will be verified by 24-hour
volume counts.

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 4

3. Analysis Scenarios: The following analysis
scenarios, in the order shown, shall be
included for roadway and intersection
capacity analysis:
a. Existing Year Traffic Condition (identify
any existing deficiencies)
b. Project Opening (Near - Term) Year
Base Traffic Condition
c. Project Opening (Near - Term) Year
Base plus Other Proposed Projects
Traffic Condition (Obtain Other
Proposed Project information from the
City in advance)
d. Project Opening (Near - Term) Year
Base plus Other Projects plus Project
Traffic Condition
e. Project Opening (Near - Term) Year
Base plus Other Projects plus Project
Traffic Condition with Mitigations, if
necessary
f. Future Build-out Year Cumulative Base
(TBD - approved projection method)
Traffic Condition
g. Future Build-out Year Cumulative Base
plus Project Traffic Condition
h. Future Build-out Year Cumulative Base
plus Project Traffic Condition with
Mitigations, if necessary
Additionally, a staging analysis may be
required for phased projects to identify the
timing of future phases and needed
mitigation measures.

4. Internal Circulation & Access
Management: Include a discussion on
internal circulation and proposed on-site
parking. Show and discuss how vehicles
would enter and exit via the main access
driveways and identify any on-site or offsite circulation problems. Identify the need for signal controls using traffic signal
warrants specified in the latest edition of
the California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (CAMUTCD).

Requests for site access or access
modification shall be addressed in the
Traffic Impact Analysis. Study
recommendations shall include site access
and transportation improvements needed
to maintain traffic flow to, from, within, and
past the site at an acceptable and safe
level of service. Areas to address include:
• Separate conflict areas. Reduce the
number of access points or increase
their spacing so conflict areas or
maneuvering areas do not overlap.
• Limit the type of conflict areas by
preventing certain maneuvers.
• Remove turning vehicles or queues
from through lanes
• Safety of a proposed access (sight
distance both horizontally and
vertically), including
pedestrian features.
• Reduce the speed differential in
through lanes between through
vehicles and turning vehicles.
• Consider the impact of access points
on adjacent or nearby properties on
both sides of the roadway.

Improvements include such things as:
relocation, restriction, or elimination of
access points, roadway widening, turning
lanes, traffic signals, and
pedestrian facilities.

The number of vehicle access points
should be minimized by sharing driveways
and linking parking lots between adjacent
uses. Commercial developments shall
provide coordinated internal circulation
and connected parking facilities. Welldefined accessible walkways must be designed into all parking lots, with
interconnections between walkways to
create safe walking conditions and access
to the site from the public right of way.

5. Capacity Analysis Method: The latest
version of the Transportation Research
Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)
shall be the basis for operational delay/LOS

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 5
calculations for signalized and unsignalized
intersections. Several software packages
are available for conducting LOS analysis.

The latest version of the software package
used must be identified in the report.

6. Traffic Growth: Use of the SNABM or other
approved model may be required to
determine the future traffic volumes and
growth. It shall be the responsibility of the
traffic consultant to obtain these from
whatever source that provides the most
accurate projection within that area.

In the absence of traffic model
information, the future build-out year base
traffic volumes shall be estimated using an
annual growth factor of 2 percent per year,
unless a different rate can be justified and
is approved and/or required by the Public
Works Department. The horizon year for
the cumulative analysis shall be the current
horizon year of the SNABM travel demand
model at the time of the TIA’s preparation.

7. Traffic Impacts: The following criteria shall
be used to assess when a project is
determined to have a “significant” impact
related to the operations of
roadway facilities:

The project deteriorates the operations of
a signalized intersection from acceptable
to unacceptable based on the level of
service standard established in the
General Plan.
• The project results in a signalized
intersection deteriorating from LOS E
to LOS F.
• The project adds ten or more trips to a
signalized intersection projected to
operate at an unacceptable level F prior
to the addition of project traffic.
• The project deteriorates the operations
of a controlled movement at an
unsignalized intersection from LOS E or
better to LOS F, or at intersections
where a controlled movement already
operates at LOS F, one of the following:
• Project traffic results in satisfaction
at the peak hour volume traffic signal
warrant; or
• Project traffic increases minor
movement delay by more than 30
seconds; or
• Where the peak hour volume signal
warrant is met without project traffic
and delay cannot be measured,
project increases traffic by 10 or
more vehicles per lane on the
controlled approach.
• The addition of project traffic at a study
intersection would result in the 95th
percentile vehicle queue exceeding the
available storage or would increase
95th percentile queue by more than
two vehicles (50 feet) where the queue
already exceeds the available storage
space (for example, vehicle queues
spilling back from ramp terminal
intersections to the freeway mainline,
or vehicle queues extending beyond
the available turn pocket length,
impeding travel in the adjacent lanes).

8. Mitigation Requirements: The report
should identify level of service problems
under existing conditions and identify
measures that will provide an acceptable
LOS. These measures shall be assumed to
be in place for subsequent analyses.

Mitigation measures must be identified for
intersections that show a significant
project impact per item 7 above and
operate at LOS E or worse under the
conditions identified in Items 3d and/or 3g
above. The LOS with mitigation must be
improved to LOS D or better for
intersections and LOS C or better for
roadway segments, under the conditions
identified in Items 3e and/or 3h above.

Identify mitigation measures for both
opening year and future build-out year
conditions. Mitigation measures may need
to be identified for other conditions,
depending on the project phasing
and timing.

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 6

9. Mitigation Fair-share Cost Calculations:

The percentage of fair-share for the
project shall be calculated at each location
using the total trips generated by the
project divided by the total “new” traffic,
which is the net increase in traffic volume
from all proposed projects (Other Projects
plus Project) and growth. The cost of
mitigation shall be estimated using
verifiable cost estimates from reliable and
recognized sources. Fair-share cost of
mitigation shall be calculated using the
fair-share percentage of the project
volumes multiplied by total estimated cost
of mitigation.

10. Sight Distance: Sight distance restrictions
shall be addressed in the TIA. Sight
distance is the length of roadway visible to
the driver. Specified areas along
intersection approach legs and across
their included corners should be clear of
obstructions that might block a driver’s
view of potentially conflicting vehicles.

These specified areas are known as clear
sight triangles. The dimensions of the legs
of the sight triangles depend on the design
speeds of the intersecting roadways and
the type of traffic control used at the
intersection. Intersection sight distance
calculations shall be based on the most
recent edition of the AASHTO Manual or
Caltrans Highway Design Manual.

11. Alternate Modes of Transportation: The
TIA shall identify other transportation
modes that may be applicable, such as
transit use, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities. New developments are
encouraged to implement Transportation
Demand Management practices and
introduce methods for trip reduction.

12. Safe Walking Conditions: The TIA must
consider pedestrian connections and
provision of safe and accessible walking
routes. It shall consider sidewalks and
other planning features to assure safe
walking conditions. For sites near schools,
the TIA will consider how site conditions
will support safe routes to school
for students.

13. Road Adequacy: The TIA shall include
detailed discussion and analysis of the
adequacy of roads serving the site and
within the project. Recommendations for
needed upgrades to local roadways shall
be included in the TIA. For projects with
significant heavy vehicle traffic, a
preferred access route to/from the site for
most heavy vehicle trips will be identified
and the road segment’s traffic index along
that route will be analyzed.

14. Collision History: The TIA shall evaluate
the most recent five years of vehicle,
pedestrian, and bicycle collision data for
all study intersections plus roadway
segments in proximity to the project site
as determined by the scope of work. The
analysis shall:
• Calculate street segment and
intersection collision frequencies based
on existing geometric configurations
and five years of collision data.
• Identify if there are crash patterns in
the data by analyzing vehicle,
pedestrian, and bicycle collisions by
collision type, severity, primary collision
factor, and movement. Summarize
findings and observations, and collision
rate using tables and narrative. For
additional guidance, see chapters 5 and
6 of the AASHTO Highway Safety
Manual (HSM).
• Determine if the project would
contribute to an existing problem or if
any improvements are recommended
to alleviate potential effects of the
project. Consult the Federal Highway
Administration’s Crash Modification
Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse and/or
Part D of the HSM to identify potential
needed safety treatments at study
intersections. Review available CMFs
related to assess potential treatments
for the purposes of addressing project
effects on safety. Identify the CMFs
that are applicable based on the study

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 7
intersection characteristics and the
source of the CMFs. Include a listing of
CMF values, CMF standard errors (if
given), and CMF quality based on
FHWA 5-star rating system, with a
focus on CMFs with 4-star or
5-star ratings.
• Identify potential improvements to
geometric design, lane configuration,
and/or signal equipment to improve
transportation safety at
study intersections.

15. Traffic Calming: Internal traffic calming
shall be incorporated into all
developments to control cut-through
traffic and reduce speed within the
development. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall identify and propose specific traffic
calming measures and locations to be
incorporated in the development. Traffic
calming shall be aesthetically pleasing.

Public transportation shall also be
evaluated. The traffic-calming plan shall
include an overall drawing of the
development and identify specific
locations and features to be included in
the development. The proponent’s traffic
engineer shall work with the City Traffic
Engineer to develop a traffic-calming plan
for the development.

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 8
Report Format
To address traffic impact concerns, the TIA
report shall contain the following:

Cover Page with an appropriate title of the
Study and applicable application numbers,
Preparer’s name, mailing address, email
address, phone and fax numbers, and
preparation date.

Certification Page with a statement indicating
that the study has been prepared by, or under
the supervision of, a registered traffic engineer
or professional engineer licensed to practice
as a traffic engineer, and the preparer’s
signature and seal of registration.

Table of Contents
An Executive Summary (describing the study
scope and findings) Introduction – (describing
the project and the purpose of the study) Data
Collection, Data Source and Analysis
Methodology
Documentation of Analysis and Findings
(details may be included in an appendix)
Identification of traffic impacts associated
with the project
Identification of measures required to mitigate
the traffic impacts associated with the project
and their timing, if needed
Project Mitigation Fair-Share Cost Calculation
as a percent of impact, if needed
Figures showing, at a minimum, the following:
• Vicinity Map
• Site Plan showing project driveways
• Existing traffic volumes (peak hours
and ADT)
• Existing intersection lane configuration and
traffic control Location of Related Projects
• Cumulative traffic volumes from other
projects Project trip distribution
percentages
• Project related traffic volumes, including at
site-access driveways Project opening year
cumulative traffic volume
• Build-out year traffic volume with Project
• Future lane configuration and traffic control
used in future analysis
• Future lane configuration and traffic control
used in future analysis with identified
mitigation, if necessary.

Tables showing, at a minimum, the following:
• Project trip generation
• Other projects’ trip generation
• Intersection Capacity Analysis results for
various scenarios, identifying locations with
significant impacts that require mitigation,
if necessary
• Mitigation Measures, if necessary
• Calculation of Project’s fair-share cost of
mitigation, if necessary
Discussion of internal circulation and access
management
Sight distance and safety at intersections and
access points Transit, pedestrian, and bike
access opportunities
Roadway adequacy
Conclusion

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 9
CEQA
Transportation
Assessment
This section describes the transportation
analysis guidelines that establish general
procedures and requirements for the
preparation of California Environmental Quality
Act compliant transportation studies for landuse development projects within the City of Vallejo. The guidelines outlined in this section
shall be used in the preparation of the analysis
contained within the transportation and
circulation section of a CEQA document. This
CEQA Transportation section is a standalone
document different and separate from the TIA
report outlined on pages 1 through 8 of this
document. In general, the guidelines are
designed for use by transportation engineering
and CEQA professionals. These guidelines
supersede and replace the City of Vallejo’s
prior guidelines on this topic (City of Vallejo
CEQA Transportation Impact Analysis
Guidelines, Fehr & Peers, July 2020, Revised
October 2020).

SB 743 and the
Updated CEQA
Guidelines
Senate Bill 743, signed by the governor in
2013, changed the way transportation impacts
are identified and measured in California.

Specifically, the legislation directed the then
Office of Planning and Research (now the
Office of Land Use and Climate
Innovation/LCI) to consider different metrics
for identifying transportation impacts under
the California Environmental Quality Act.

OPR/LCI released its Technical Advisory on
Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA1 in
1 http://opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122-
743_Technical_Advisory.pdf
December 2018 in conjunction with the formal
adoption of the CEQA Guidelines requiring
vehicle miles traveled analysis for CEQA
transportation analyses after July 1, 2020.

The updated guidelines include revised CEQA
Appendix G Checklist criteria for
transportation impact evaluation. The four
criteria are as follows:

Would the project:

1. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including public transit, roadway, bicycle,
and pedestrian facilities?

2. Would the project conflict or be
inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3, subdivision (b)?

3. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?

4. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Criteria 2 addresses the implementation of the
SB 743 requirement. CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3, subdivision (b) reads, in part, as
follows:

1. Land Use Projects. Vehicle-miles traveled
exceeding an applicable threshold of
significance may indicate a significant
impact. Generally, projects within one halfmile of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high-quality
transit corridor should be presumed to
cause a less than significant transportation
impact. Projects that decrease vehicle
miles traveled in the project area compared
to existing conditions should be presumed
to have a less than significant
transportation impact.

2. Transportation Projects. Transportation
projects that reduce, or have no impact

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 10 on, vehicle miles traveled should be
presumed to cause a less than significant
transportation impact. For roadway
capacity projects, agencies have
discretion to determine the appropriate
measure of transportation impact
consistent with CEQA and other applicable
requirements. To the extent that such
impacts have already been adequately
addressed at a programmatic level, such
as in a regional transportation plan EIR, a
lead agency may tier from that analysis as
provided in Section 15152.

3. Qualitative Analysis. If existing models or
methods are not available to estimate the
vehicle miles traveled for the particular
project being considered, a lead agency
may analyze the project’s vehicle miles
traveled qualitatively. Such a qualitative
analysis would evaluate factors such as the
availability of transit, proximity to other
destinations, etc. For many projects, a
qualitative analysis of construction traffic
may be appropriate.

4. Methodology. A lead agency has discretion
to choose the most appropriate
methodology to evaluate a project’s
vehicle miles traveled, including whether
to express the change in absolute terms,
per capita, per household, or in any other
measure. A lead agency may use models
to estimate a project’s vehicle miles
traveled and may revise those estimates to
reflect professional judgment based on
substantial evidence. Any assumptions
used to estimate vehicle miles traveled
and any revisions to model outputs should
be documented and explained in the
environmental document prepared for the
project. The standard of adequacy in
Section 15151 shall apply to the analysis
described in this section.

Can LOS Analysis Still be
Conducted as Part of
Development Review?
A key element of SB 743 is the elimination of
automobile delay and Level of Service (LOS)
as the sole basis of determining CEQA
impacts. The most recent CEQA guidelines,
released in December 2018, recommend VMT
as the most appropriate measure of project
transportation impacts. However, SB 743 does
not prevent a city or county from continuing to
analyze delay or LOS outside of CEQA review
as part of other transportation planning or
analysis purposes (i.e., general plans, impact
fee programs, corridor studies, congestion
mitigation, or ongoing network monitoring);
but these metrics may no longer constitute the
sole basis for CEQA impacts. These guidelines
provide technical direction regarding the
assessment of VMT, thresholds of significance,
and mitigation measures for land development
and transportation projects within the
City of Vallejo.

The City’s General Plan 2040 establishes an
advisory standard of LOS E or better, to be
considered along with, but not override,
metrics for pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and
emergency access performance (General Plan
Policy MTC-2.5). LOS can continue to be
assessed relative to this standard during
development review, to promote the city’s
interest in maintaining and operating a
functional roadway network. However,
assessment of a development project’s effect
on intersection level of service must be
conducted outside the CEQA process. The
assessment can be performed as part of a
General Plan consistency assessment, within a
separate traffic impact analysis document.

Within the City of Vallejo, this is performed
within a non-CEQA Traffic Impact Analysis per
the guidelines on pages 1 through 8 of this
document.

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 11 Congestion Management
Program Compliance Changes
SB 743 contains amendments to current
congestion management law that allows cities
and counties to effectively opt-out of the LOS
standards that would otherwise apply in areas
where Congestion Management Programs
(CMPs) are still used (see Government Code
Sections 65088.1 and 65088.4). Solano
County’s Congestion Management Program
was recently updated in September 2023. The
CMP network in Vallejo includes I-80, SR 37,
SR 29 (Sonoma Boulevard), Curtola Parkway,
Mare Island Way, and Tennessee Street west
of I-80. Three intersections are also monitored
in the CMP: Tennessee Street/Sonoma
Boulevard, Tennessee Street/Mare Island Way,
and Curtola Parkway/Sonoma Boulevard. The
LOS standard for these intersections is LOS E.

The 2023 monitoring indicated all three
intersections operated at LOS D or better.

VMT Analysis
For the purposes of SB 743 compliance, a
VMT assessment should be conducted for land
use projects. In general, VMT is an efficiency
metric and should be normalized on a per
capita basis relative to the number of
residents, employees, or service population
depending on the project type (service
population is residents plus
employees).Normalizing VMT per service
population, resident, or employee essentially
provides a transportation efficiency metric.

Using an efficiency metric allows the analyst to
compare the project to the city, region, or
county, for purposes of identifying
transportation impacts.

For the purposes of assessing significant
impacts, the City of Vallejo has established the
following standards of significance.

VMT Thresholds of Significance
The following are the City of Vallejo’s
thresholds of significance related to
substantial additional VMT:
• For residential projects, a project would
cause substantial additional VMT if it
exceeds existing citywide household
VMT per capita minus 15 percent.
• For employment projects, a project
would cause substantial additional VMT
if it exceeds the existing regionwide
VMT per employee minus 15 percent.
• For regional retail projects a project
would cause substantial additional VMT
if it would increase net regional VMT.
• Mixed-use projects shall be divided into
their individual constituent parts and
evaluated against their individual
components’ standards.

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 12 Project VMT
Screening
The State of California allows, and the City of
Vallejo has adopted screening criteria that can
be used to quickly assess if certain project
types can be presumed to have a less than
significant adverse impact relative to VMT. If a
project or components of the project meet any
of the adopted screening criteria, then it is
presumed VMT impacts would be less than
significant for the project or component of the
project, and a detailed VMT analysis is not
required. City staff can deny the use of
screening criteria if substantial evidence
suggests the project is not appropriate
for screening. Projects meeting the screening
criteria would not be subject to a VMT analysis
for the purposes of the CEQA Transportation
section; however, a project’s effect on VMT, or
the VMT generated by the project, would still
be studied as part of the CEQA Air Quality,
Greenhouse Gas, and/or Energy sections, as
applicable.

The screening criteria are—in addition to other
CEQA exemptions—unchanged by SB 743,
including CEQA exemptions for projects
consistent with an adopted General or Specific
Plan (CEQA Guidelines §15183). Claiming a
CEQA exemption on the basis of §15183 may
carry additional legal risk in the post-SB 743
CEQA legal environment, especially if the EIR
for the General Plan does not include an
analysis of VMT; the city may choose to
require an informational VMT analysis to prove
that a project is consistent (on a VMT basis)
with the land uses previously environmentally
cleared as part of an adopted Specific Plan or
General Plan. This approach is similar to the
approach taken when CEQA Transportation
section impacts were evaluated on the basis of
delay and level of service, whereby a project
applicant would be required to provide a trip
generation memorandum prepared by a
qualified consultant to demonstrate that a
project adds a negligible number of trips to
the roadway system.

Absent substantial evidence that the project in
question might generate a potentially
significant level of VMT, projects that meet at
least one of the following screening criteria
would be presumed to cause a less-thansignificant VMT impact and would not require VMT analysis.

VMT Screening Criteria
The City of Vallejo has three key screening
criteria for projects: project type, project
location in a low VMT area, and project
location near transit stations. A project only
needs to meet one of the three screening
criteria to “screen out.” Projects that do not
meet any of the identified screening criteria
are required to conduct a detailed VMT
assessment.

Screening Criteria 1: Project Type
Absent evidence indicating that a project
would generate a potentially significant level of
VMT, the following types of projects should be
expected to cause a less-than-significant
impact under CEQA and would not require
further VMT analysis. Evidence indicating that
a project may not be eligible to screen could
include unusual or unique land use types or
uses, site locations requiring atypical travel or
other characteristics identified by city staff.
• Small Scale, Local-Serving Retail: Localserving retail projects are defined as projects of less than or equal to 50,000
square feet in size on the basis that they
attract trips that would otherwise travel
longer distances. Local-serving retail
generally improves the convenience of
shopping and other activities close to
home and has the effect of reducing
vehicle travel.
• Transportation Projects Not Likely to Lead
to Substantial Increase in Vehicle Travel:

Screened transportation projects include

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 13 transit projects, bicycle and pedestrian
projects, and roadway projects that do not
result in vehicle capacity increase.
• Public Services: Police stations, fire
stations, public utilities, and parks do not
generally generate VMT. Instead, these land
uses are often built in response to
development from other land uses (e.g.,
office and residential). Therefore, these
land uses can be presumed to have lessthan-significant impacts on VMT. However, this presumption would not apply if the
project is sited in a location that would
require employees or visitors to travel
substantial distances (such as locations on
the outskirts of the city or sites requiring
abnormal levels of vehicle travel), and the
project is not located within one half-mile
of a major transit stop or does not meet the
small project screening criterion.
• Small Projects: Projects that generate very
few trips per day can be reasonably
expected to not generate significant
impacts related to greenhouse gas
emissions (GHG).

According to findings from the CAPCOA’s
CEQA and climate change white paper
(Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse
Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act,
CAPCOA, January 2008), small
developments that generate less than 900
MTCO2 per year are considered to have de
minimis impact on GHG emissions.

The CAPCOA screening level threshold of
900 MTCO2 is more conservative than the
level provided historically by BAAQMD. The
CAPCOA threshold is in line with the post2020 reduction goals established by SB 32.

Thus, for the purposes of this assessment,
the 900 MTCO2 per year screening level
was examined in accordance with CAPCOA
2 California Air Resources Board (November 2025).
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2025-
11/nc-2000_2023_ghg_inventory_trends.pdf
guidance. The screening level does not
indicate impact significance; rather, it is
intended to screen out smaller projects that
do not generate substantial amounts of
GHG emissions, and it allows regulatory
and discretionary actions to focus on more
significant sources of GHG emissions.

Projects that emit less than 900 MTCO2 per
year would likely not be considered
cumulatively considerable and would not
interfere with the ability of the state to
achieve its GHG reduction targets.

METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE SMALL

PROJECT TRIP THRESHOLD
The methodology for applying the de minimis
GHG emissions screening threshold to
develop a locally applicable VMT screening
threshold involves calculating how many daily
residential or commercial trips would equate
to the transportation-related GHG emissions
of a local development whose total annual
emissions would fall under the 900 MTCO2 per
year level. CARB estimated the on and off-site
transportation-related emissions (including
energy production for transportation) to be
approximately 37% of regional GHG
emissions. 2 Therefore, the transportation
component of a development’s total emissions
falling under the screening threshold would be
333 MTCO2 per year.

The methodology estimates the annual GHG
emissions from a given number of daily vehicle
trips as the sum of vehicle starting emissions
and vehicle running emissions, multiplied by
an annualization factor. The vehicle starting
emissions are proportional to the daily vehicle
trips and the vehicle running emissions are
proportional to the daily VMT, both of which
are obtained from the Solano Napa Activity
Based Model (SNBAM), which is locally
approved and calibrated. Parameters from the
California Emissions Estimator Model

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 14 (CalEEMod) Version 2020.4.0 informed the
conversion of vehicle trips and VMT to CO2-
equivalent emissions. 3 Analysis of countywide
StreetLight data resulted in a VMT
annualization factor of 353.

Figure 1 illustrates the subareas by which small
project VMT screening should be conducted.

These areas were developed through multiple
runs of the SNBAM to assess geographic areas
and boundaries that represent land uses with
comparable and analogous travel behavior.

Table 1 shows the maximum daily residential or
commercial trips that generate annual GHG
emissions falling under the 333 MTCO2 per
year threshold, for each subarea.

Developments that generate fewer daily trips
than those presented in the table as the
threshold can be “screened out” and
presumed to have a less than significant
impact on VMT.

The thresholds differ by subarea based on the
average trip distance for household and
employee trips. Some geographic subareas
are more VMT efficient than others. Table 2
provides more detailed information for
each area.
3 CAPCOA (2021). Appendix D: Default Data Tables.
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendixd2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12.

Table 1. Small Project VMT
Screening Criteria
Subarea
Daily
Residential
Trips1
Daily
Employment
Trips1
One 300 220
Two 310 180
Three 300 230
Four 330 200
Five 300 220
Six 250 110
Seven 280 200
Citywide 300 190
Source: SNABM and Fehr & Peers.
1 Value is rounded down to the nearest 10.

EXAMPLE OF SMALL PROJECT SCREENING

CRITERIA USE
To assess if a project falls below the City’s
small project screening criteria, an analyst
would first calculate the number of daily trips
that the development would generate. Then
the analyst would locate the project site on
Figure 1 and compare the daily trip calculation
to the values in Table 1. As an example, a
residential project in Subarea 6 would be
screened out if it generated less than 250
daily trips.

Benicia
State
Recreation
Area
Napa-Sonoma Marshes
Wildlife Area
San Pablo
Bay
Napa
River
Carquinez
Strait
American
Canyon
Crockett
Mare
Island
Vallejo
Benicia
29 29
80 80
80 37
37 780
780
6 7
5 4
2 3
1 0 1 2
Miles
Subareas
VMT Screening Subareas
FIGURE 1

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 16 Table 2: Small Project ADT Screening Thresholds
Area One: Residential Area One: Employment
Veh.
trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq. Veh. trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq.
g/year MT/year g/year MT/year
200 1,684.2 216,003,726 216.0 200 2,342.1 298,357,059 298.4 250 2,105.2 270,004,658 270.0 223 2,611.5 332,668,121 332.7 300 2,526.2 324,005,589 324.0 250 2,927.7 372,946,324 372.9 305 2,568.4 329,405,683 329.4 300 3,513.2 447,535,588 447.5 350 2,947.3 378,006,521 378.0 350 4,098.7 522,124,853 522.1 400 3,368.3 432,007,453 432.0 400 4,684.3 596,714,118 596.7 450 3,789.4 486,008,384 486.0 450 5,269.8 671,303,382 671.3 500 4,210.4 540,009,316 540.0 500 5,855.3 745,892,647 745.9 550 4,631.5 594,010,247 594.0 550 6,440.9 820,481,912 820.5 600 5,052.5 648,011,179 648.0 600 7,026.4 895,071,176 895.1 650 5,473.5 702,012,110 702.0 650 7,611.9 969,660,441 969.7 676 5,692.5 730,092,595 730.1 676 7,916.4 1,008,446,859 1008.4 700 5,894.6 756,013,042 756.0 700 8,197.5 1,044,249,706 1044.2 750 6,315.6 810,013,974 810.0 750 8,783.0 1,118,838,971 1118.8 800 6,736.7 864,014,905 864.0 800 9,368.5 1,193,428,235 1193.4 850 7,157.7 918,015,837 918.0 850 9,954.1 1,268,017,500 1268.0 900 7,578.7 972,016,768 972.0 900 10,539.6 1,342,606,765 1342.6 Average trip distance: 8.42 miles Average trip distance: 11.71 miles Annualization factor for VMT: 353
Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Running for LDA (g/VMT): 354.57 [1] Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Starting for LDA (g/VT):73.77 [1] [1] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-d2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 17 Area Two: Residential Area Two: Employment
Veh.
trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq. Veh. trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq.
g/year MT/year g/year MT/year
200 1,635.0 209,852,939 209.9 188 2,620.3 332,861,786 332.9 250 2,043.8 262,316,174 262.3 200 2,787.6 354,108,284 354.1 300 2,452.5 314,779,409 314.8 250 3,484.5 442,635,354 442.6 316 2,583.3 331,567,644 331.6 300 4,181.3 531,162,425 531.2 333 2,722.3 349,405,144 349.4 350 4,878.2 619,689,496 619.7 400 3,270.0 419,705,878 419.7 400 5,575.1 708,216,567 708.2 450 3,678.8 472,169,113 472.2 450 6,272.0 796,743,638 796.7 500 4,087.6 524,632,348 524.6 500 6,968.9 885,270,709 885.3 550 4,496.3 577,095,583 577.1 550 7,665.8 973,797,780 973.8 600 4,905.1 629,558,817 629.6 600 8,362.7 1,062,324,851 1062.3 650 5,313.8 682,022,052 682.0 650 9,059.6 1,150,851,921 1150.9 676 5,526.4 709,302,934 709.3 676 9,422.0 1,196,885,998 1196.9 700 5,722.6 734,485,287 734.5 700 9,756.5 1,239,378,992 1239.4 750 6,131.3 786,948,522 786.9 750 10,453.4 1,327,906,063 1327.9 800 6,540.1 839,411,756 839.4 800 11,150.2 1,416,433,134 1416.4 850 6,948.8 891,874,991 891.9 850 11,847.1 1,504,960,205 1505.0 900 7,357.6 944,338,226 944.3 900 12,544.0 1,593,487,276 1593.5 Average trip distance: 8.18 miles Average trip distance: 13.94 miles Annualization factor for VMT: 353
Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Running for LDA (g/VMT): 354.57 [1] Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Starting for LDA (g/VT):73.77 [1] [1] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-d2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 18 Area Three: Residential Area Three: Employment
Veh.
trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq. Veh. trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq.
g/year MT/year g/year MT/year
200 1,691.0 216,859,636 216.9 200 2,213.9 282,309,211 282.3 250 2,113.8 271,074,545 271.1 235 2,601.4 331,713,323 331.7 300 2,536.5 325,289,454 325.3 250 2,767.4 352,886,514 352.9 307 2,595.7 332,879,541 332.9 300 3,320.9 423,463,817 423.5 350 2,959.3 379,504,363 379.5 350 3,874.4 494,041,119 494.0 400 3,382.0 433,719,272 433.7 400 4,427.8 564,618,422 564.6 450 3,804.8 487,934,181 487.9 450 4,981.3 635,195,725 635.2 500 4,227.5 542,149,090 542.1 500 5,534.8 705,773,028 705.8 550 4,650.3 596,363,999 596.4 550 6,088.3 776,350,331 776.4 600 5,073.0 650,578,908 650.6 600 6,641.8 846,927,633 846.9 650 5,495.8 704,793,817 704.8 650 7,195.2 917,504,936 917.5 676 5,715.6 732,985,570 733.0 676 7,483.0 954,205,134 954.2 700 5,918.5 759,008,726 759.0 700 7,748.7 988,082,239 988.1 750 6,341.3 813,223,636 813.2 750 8,302.2 1,058,659,542 1058.7 800 6,764.0 867,438,545 867.4 800 8,855.7 1,129,236,844 1129.2 850 7,186.8 921,653,454 921.7 850 9,409.2 1,199,814,147 1199.8 900 7,609.5 975,868,363 975.9 900 9,962.6 1,270,391,450 1270.4 Average trip distance: 8.46 miles Average trip distance: 11.07 miles Annualization factor for VMT: 353
Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Running for LDA (g/VMT): 354.57 [1] Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Starting for LDA (g/VT):73.77 [1] [1] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-d2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 19 Area Four: Residential Area Four: Employment
Veh.
trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq. Veh. trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq.
g/year MT/year g/year MT/year
200 1,551.6 199,405,871 199.4 200 2,539.0 322,995,804 323.0 250 1,939.4 249,257,339 249.3 206 2,615.2 332,685,678 332.7 300 2,327.3 299,108,806 299.1 250 3,173.7 403,744,755 403.7 333 2,583.3 332,010,775 332.0 300 3,808.5 484,493,706 484.5 350 2,715.2 348,960,274 349.0 350 4,443.2 565,242,657 565.2 400 3,103.1 398,811,742 398.8 400 5,078.0 645,991,608 646.0 450 3,491.0 448,663,210 448.7 450 5,712.7 726,740,559 726.7 500 3,878.9 498,514,677 498.5 500 6,347.5 807,489,510 807.5 550 4,266.8 548,366,145 548.4 550 6,982.2 888,238,461 888.2 600 4,654.7 598,217,613 598.2 600 7,617.0 968,987,411 969.0 650 5,042.6 648,069,081 648.1 650 8,251.7 1,049,736,362 1049.7 676 5,244.3 673,991,844 674.0 676 8,581.8 1,091,725,817 1091.7 700 5,430.4 697,920,548 697.9 700 8,886.5 1,130,485,313 1130.5 750 5,818.3 747,772,016 747.8 750 9,521.2 1,211,234,264 1211.2 800 6,206.2 797,623,484 797.6 800 10,155.9 1,291,983,215 1292.0 850 6,594.1 847,474,951 847.5 850 10,790.7 1,372,732,166 1372.7 900 6,982.0 897,326,419 897.3 900 11,425.4 1,453,481,117 1453.5 Average trip distance: 7.76 miles Average trip distance: 12.96 miles Annualization factor for VMT: 353
Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Running for LDA (g/VMT): 354.57 [1] Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Starting for LDA (g/VT):73.77 [1] [1] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-d2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 20 Area Five: Residential Area Five: Employment
Veh.
trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq. Veh. trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq.
g/year MT/year g/year MT/year
200 1,678.1 215,246,956 215.2 200 2,323.7 296,049,707 296.0 250 2,097.6 269,058,695 269.1 224 2,602.5 331,575,671 331.6 300 2,517.2 322,870,434 322.9 250 2,904.6 370,062,133 370.1 309 2,592.7 332,556,547 332.6 300 3,485.5 444,074,560 444.1 350 2,936.7 376,682,173 376.7 350 4,066.5 518,086,987 518.1 400 3,356.2 430,493,912 430.5 400 4,647.4 592,099,413 592.1 450 3,775.8 484,305,651 484.3 450 5,228.3 666,111,840 666.1 500 4,195.3 538,117,390 538.1 500 5,809.2 740,124,266 740.1 550 4,614.8 591,929,129 591.9 550 6,390.2 814,136,693 814.1 600 5,034.4 645,740,868 645.7 600 6,971.1 888,149,120 888.1 650 5,453.9 699,552,607 699.6 650 7,552.0 962,161,546 962.2 676 5,672.0 727,534,711 727.5 676 7,854.1 1,000,648,008 1000.6 700 5,873.4 753,364,346 753.4 700 8,132.9 1,036,173,973 1036.2 750 6,292.9 807,176,085 807.2 750 8,713.9 1,110,186,400 1110.2 800 6,712.5 860,987,824 861.0 800 9,294.8 1,184,198,826 1184.2 850 7,132.0 914,799,563 914.8 850 9,875.7 1,258,211,253 1258.2 900 7,551.5 968,611,302 968.6 900 10,456.6 1,332,223,680 1332.2 Average trip distance: 8.39 miles Average trip distance: 11.62 miles Annualization factor for VMT: 353
Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Running for LDA (g/VMT): 354.57 [1] Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Starting for LDA (g/VT):73.77 [1] [1] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-d2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 21 Area Six: Residential Area Six: Employment
Veh.
trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq. Veh. trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq.
g/year MT/year g/year MT/year
200 2,077.4 260,167,456 260.2 118 2,654.5 332,440,545 332.4 250 2,596.8 325,209,320 325.2 200 4,499.1 563,458,550 563.5 255 2,648.7 331,713,506 331.7 250 5,623.9 704,323,188 704.3 300 3,116.1 390,251,184 390.3 300 6,748.7 845,187,825 845.2 350 3,635.5 455,293,048 455.3 350 7,873.5 986,052,463 986.1 400 4,154.8 520,334,912 520.3 400 8,998.3 1,126,917,100 1126.9 450 4,674.2 585,376,776 585.4 450 10,123.1 1,267,781,738 1267.8 500 5,193.5 650,418,640 650.4 500 11,247.8 1,408,646,375 1408.6 550 5,712.9 715,460,504 715.5 550 12,372.6 1,549,511,013 1549.5 600 6,232.2 780,502,368 780.5 600 13,497.4 1,690,375,650 1690.4 650 6,751.6 845,544,232 845.5 650 14,622.2 1,831,240,288 1831.2 676 7,021.6 879,366,001 879.4 676 15,207.1 1,904,489,899 1904.5 700 7,270.9 910,586,096 910.6 700 15,747.0 1,972,104,925 1972.1 750 7,790.3 975,627,960 975.6 750 16,871.8 2,112,969,563 2113.0 800 8,309.6 1,040,669,824 1040.7 800 17,996.6 2,253,834,200 2253.8 850 8,829.0 1,105,711,688 1105.7 850 19,121.3 2,394,698,838 2394.7 900 9,348.3 1,170,753,552 1170.8 900 20,246.1 2,535,563,475 2535.6 Average trip distance: 10.39 miles Average trip distance: 22.50 miles Annualization factor for VMT: 353
Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Running for LDA (g/VMT): 354.57 [1] Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Starting for LDA (g/VT):73.77 [1] [1] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-d2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 22 Area Seven: Residential Area Seven: Employment
Veh.
trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq. Veh. trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq.
g/year MT/year g/year MT/year
200 1,824.0 233,524,367 233.5 200 2,522.3 320,929,482 320.9 250 2,280.0 291,905,458 291.9 207 2,610.6 332,162,013 332.2 285 2,599.1 332,772,223 332.8 250 3,152.9 401,161,852 401.2 300 2,735.9 350,286,550 350.3 300 3,783.4 481,394,222 481.4 350 3,191.9 408,667,642 408.7 350 4,414.0 561,626,593 561.6 400 3,647.9 467,048,734 467.0 400 5,044.6 641,858,963 641.9 500 4,559.9 583,810,917 583.8 500 6,305.7 802,323,704 802.3 550 5,015.9 642,192,009 642.2 550 6,936.3 882,556,075 882.6 600 5,471.9 700,573,100 700.6 600 7,566.9 962,788,445 962.8 650 5,927.9 758,954,192 759.0 650 8,197.4 1,043,020,815 1043.0 676 6,165.0 789,312,360 789.3 676 8,525.3 1,084,741,648 1084.7 700 6,383.9 817,335,284 817.3 700 8,828.0 1,123,253,186 1123.3 750 6,839.9 875,716,375 875.7 750 9,458.6 1,203,485,556 1203.5 800 7,295.9 934,097,467 934.1 800 10,089.2 1,283,717,927 1283.7 850 7,751.8 992,478,559 992.5 850 10,719.7 1,363,950,297 1364.0 900 8,207.8 1,050,859,650 1050.9 900 11,350.3 1,444,182,667 1444.2 Average trip distance: 9.12 miles Average trip distance: 13.33 miles Annualization factor for VMT: 353
Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Running for LDA (g/VMT): 354.57 [1] Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Starting for LDA (g/VT):73.77 [1] [1] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-d2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12

City of Vallejo Transportation Analysis Guidelines | 23 Citywide: Residential Citywide: Employment
Veh.
trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq. Veh. trips/day
(HB VT)
VMT/day
(HB VMT)
CO2 Eq.
g/year MT/year g/year MT/year
200 1,708.8 219,104,449 219.1 196 2,612.7 332,138,189 332.1 250 2,135.9 273,880,562 273.9 200 2,666.0 338,916,519 338.9 300 2,563.1 328,656,674 328.7 250 3,332.5 423,645,649 423.6 303 2,588.8 331,943,241 331.9 300 3,999.0 508,374,778 508.4 350 2,990.3 383,432,787 383.4 350 4,665.5 593,103,908 593.1 400 3,417.5 438,208,899 438.2 400 5,332.0 677,833,038 677.8 500 4,271.9 547,761,124 547.8 500 6,665.0 847,291,297 847.3 550 4,699.1 602,537,236 602.5 550 7,331.5 932,020,427 932.0 600 5,126.3 657,313,348 657.3 600 7,998.0 1,016,749,557 1016.7 650 5,553.5 712,089,461 712.1 650 8,664.5 1,101,478,687 1101.5 676 5,775.6 740,573,039 740.6 676 9,011.1 1,145,537,834 1145.5 700 5,980.6 766,865,573 766.9 700 9,331.0 1,186,207,816 1186.2 750 6,407.8 821,641,685 821.6 750 9,997.5 1,270,936,946 1270.9 800 6,835.0 876,417,798 876.4 800 10,664.0 1,355,666,076 1355.7 850 7,262.2 931,193,910 931.2 850 11,330.5 1,440,395,206 1440.4 900 7,689.4 985,970,022 986.0 900 11,997.0 1,525,124,335 1525.1 Average trip distance: 8.54 miles Average trip distance: 13.33 miles Annualization factor for VMT: 353
Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Running for LDA (g/VMT): 354.57 [1] Yolo/Solano AQMD 2026 Annual CO2 Starting for LDA (g/VT):73.77 [1] [1] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-d2020-4-0-full-merge.pdf?sfvrsn=12