Joint Special Meeting Agenda October 1, 2024
Agenda
City of Vernon
Tuesday, October 1, 2024, 9:30 AM
City Hall, Council Chamber
4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California
Joint Special Meeting of the City Council,
Green Vernon Commission,
Vernon Business and Industry Commission,
Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee, and
Vernon Housing Commission
The purpose of this meeting is to conduct training of the City’s legislative bodies. The meeting can be viewed at CityofVernon.org/publicmeetings.
A majority of the Council, Commissions and Committees may attend the meeting. No decisions will be made, and no action will be taken.
CALL TO ORDER
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public may address any item described in he notice in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.3(a).
PRESENTATIONS
1. AB1234 Ethics Training
Recommendation:
No action required by City Council. This is a presentation only.
ADJOURNMENT
On September 26, 2024, the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Regular and Adjourned Regular meeting agendas may be amended up to 72 hours and Special meeting agendas may be amended up to 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
Joint Special Meeting Agenda October 1, 2024
Guide to City Council Proceedings
Meetings of the City Council are held the first and third Tuesday of each month at 9:00 a.m. and are conducted in accordance with Rosenberg's Rules of Order (Vernon Municipal Code Section
2.04.020).
Copies of all agenda items and back-up materials are available for review in the City Clerk Department, Vernon City Hall, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California, and are available for public inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Agenda reports may be reviewed on the City's website at www.cityofvernon.org or copies may be purchased for $0.10 per page.
Disability-related services are available to enable persons with a disability to participate in this meeting, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In compliance with ADA, if you need special assistance, please contact the City Clerk department at [email protected] or (323) 583-8811 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to assure arrangements can be made.
The Public Comment portion of the agenda is for members of the public to present items, which are not listed on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The City Council cannot take action on any item that is not on the agenda but matters raised under Public Comment may be referred to staff or scheduled on a future agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes per speaker unless a different time limit is announced. Speaker slips are available at the entrance to the Council Chamber.
Public Hearings are legally noticed hearings. For hearings involving zoning matters, the applicant and appellant will be given 15 minutes to present their position to the City Council. Time may be set aside for rebuttal. All other testimony shall follow the rules as set for under Public Comment. If you challenge any City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised during the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing.
Consent Calendar items may be approved by a single motion. If a Council Member or the public wishes to discuss an item, it may be removed from the calendar for individual consideration. Council Members may indicate a negative or abstaining vote on any individual item by so declaring prior to the vote on the motion to adopt the Consent Calendar. Items excluded from the Consent Calendar will be taken up following action on the Consent Calendar. Public speakers shall follow the guidelines as set forth under Public Comment.
New Business items are matters appearing before the Council for the first time for formal action.
Those wishing to address the Council on New Business items shall follow the guidelines for Public Comment.
Closed Session allows the Council to discuss specific matters pursuant to the Brown Act, Government Code Section 54956.9. Based on the advice of the City Attorney, discussion of these matters in open session would prejudice the position of the City. Following Closed Session, the City Attorney will provide an oral report on any reportable matters discussed and actions taken. At the conclusion of Closed Session, the Council may continue any item listed on the Closed Session agenda to the Open Session agenda for discussion or to take formal action as it deems appropriate.
City Council Agenda Report
Meeting Date: October 1, 2024
From: Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
Submitted by: Yonnie Parker, Deputy City Clerk
Subject
AB1234 Ethics Training
Recommendation
No action required by City Council. This is a presentation only.
Background
The City Attorney’s Office will be providing an overview course on all public service ethics issues necessary to satisfy the requirement of the Government Code as it relates to the following: • Laws relating to personal financial gain by public servants • Laws relating to claiming perquisites (“perks”) of office • Government Transparency laws • Laws relating to fair processes • General ethical principles relating to public service This training is required every two years by the City Council, Commissions, Committee and certain designated staff that have financial disclosure requirements.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.
Attachments
None.
. . . .
Item 1 Page 1 of 134
How to Build and Maintain the Public’s
Trust: Practical Ethics and the Law
(AB 1234 Training)
Rachel Richman, Partner
1 . . . .
Item 1 Page 2 of 134
AB 1234 adopted in 2006 in
response to City of Bell
scandal
2 . . . .
Item 1 Page 3 of 134
. . . .
Item 1 Page 4 of 134
4 “I’m Not Like Those Officials” Know the rules to make sure your name does not show up in the FPPC’s “Hall of Shame”…
Summaries of Past Enforcement Cases A-Z
www.fppc.ca.gov
. . . .
Item 1 Page 5 of 134
FPPC “Heat Map”
The FPPC prosecutes
hundreds of cases
every year. This map
details the location
FPPC cases
prosecuted.
5 . . . .
Item 1 Page 6 of 134
FPPC Enforcement Cases
FPPC Enforcement Decisions In the Matter of Pete P.; FPPC No. 17/1396 Pete P., a Planning Commissioner for the City, failed to timely file an Assuming Office Statement of Economic Interests, in violation of Government Code Section 87202 (1 count). Fine: $200.
In the Matter of Eric M. FPPC No. 15/2201 County Supervisor failed to disclose gifts from a concert promotor for several years on his SEI Form then sponsored and voted in favor of vote to extend a permit for the concert promotor within the prior 12 months of the decision. FPPC fine $9,500
6 . . . .
Item 1 Page 7 of 134
7 Ethics Laws
California law
promotes ethics:
1. by requiring public
disclosure
2. by prohibiting certain
actions
3. by punishing violations . . . .
Item 1 Page 8 of 134
Agenda
1. Fair, Open and Impartial
Processes and Decision
Making (Brown Act/CPRA)
2. Personal Advantages
and Perks of Office
3. Personal Financial Gain
4. Ethics Principles
8 . . . .
Item 1 Page 9 of 134
9 Goals
That’s a lot of law
to cover in one
session…
1.Spot the Issues
2.Ask for Help
3.Failure has
Consequences
4.Ethics in Practice
BE SAFE
. . . .
Item 1 Page 10 of 134
10 Goals
1. Familiarize you with
laws that govern your
service and when to
ask questions
2. Encourage you to think
beyond legal
restrictions
Allow for open
discussions on real
world scenarios and
strengthen your
knowledge
Satisfy your AB 1234
requirement . . . .
Item 1 Page 11 of 134
11 Attorney Advice
The sooner you speak to legal counsel the better,
but remember…
The City Attorney represents the City not you
personally.
Reliance on advice from legal counsel is not a
defense if your actions result in a violation.
Only a formal advice letter from the Fair
Political Practices Commission protects you
from violations of FPPC regulations. . . . .
Item 1 Page 12 of 134
Part l: Transparency Laws
12 . . . .
Item 1 Page 13 of 134
13 The Brown Act All meetings of the
legislative body of a
local agency must be
open and public
All persons must be
permitted to attend
any meeting
. . . .
Item 1 Page 14 of 134
The Brown Act
Basic Rule: Meetings of the City Council, its
Standing Committees and other designated
Committees are subject to the Brown Act.
What is a Meeting?
any gathering of a majority of the members of
a legislative body
at the same time and location to hear, discuss, deliberate or take action upon any item which is within its subject matter
jurisdiction
14 . . . .
Item 1 Page 15 of 134
Improper Meetings
Caution: “A majority of the
members of a legislative body
shall not...use a series of
communications of any kind,
directly or through
intermediaries, to discuss,
deliberate, or take action on
any item of business that is
within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the legislative
body.
§ 54952(b)(1)
15 . . . .
Item 1 Page 16 of 134
Improper Serial Meeting Daisy Chain: If Member A contacts Member B, and Member B contacts Member C, and so on, until a
quorum has been involved, this type of “serial meeting” may result in a violation of the Brown Act.
16 . . . .
Item 1 Page 17 of 134
Improper Serial Meeting Hub and spoke: An intermediary -- such as a City staff member or even an applicant -- contacts at least a
quorum of the members to develop a collective
concurrence on action to be taken by the legislative
body.
17 . . . .
Item 1 Page 18 of 134
Individual Meetings
- OK
A City employee or official
may: engage in “separate conversations or
communications”
outside of a meeting
in order to “answer
questions or provide
information”
so long as that person “does not communicate
to members of the
legislative body the
comments or positions
of any other member or
members.”
§ 54952.2(b)(2).
18 . . . .
Item 1 Page 19 of 134
The Choice Is Yours
You are unsure how to vote at an
upcoming meeting and request
information from the City Manager.
Should you:
a) Copy the email to the entire Council.
b) Hit “Reply All” when the City Manager
responds to you and the entire Council.
c) Only email the City Manager.
d) None of the above.
19 . . . .
Item 1 Page 20 of 134
Technology “Meetings” Use of e-mail or other technology/media by a majority of a legislative body to
discuss, deliberate, or take action on
items within the body’s jurisdiction
violates the Brown Act.
20 . . . .
Item 1 Page 21 of 134
Email/Text//Technology Avoid sending e-mails/texts to the whole body. If necessary, provide information only. Do not solicit a response. Be careful replying to e-mails/texts. Do not communicate your position or make a commitment on a pending matter.
Do not direct a reply to a majority of the body.
Think carefully before sending any e-mail/texts.
Remember, your e-mail can be forwarded by others to a majority of the body. The Internet has a long memory. 21 . . . .
Item 1 Page 22 of 134
Social Media
– AB 992
Amends Government Code section
54952.2 to add new provisions
Applies from January 1, 2020
through January 1, 2026 . . . .
Item 1 Page 23 of 134
Direct Response Prohibited AB 992 “A member of the legislative body shall not respond directly to any communication on
an internet-based social media platform
regarding a matter that is within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the legislative body that
is made, posted, or shared by any other
member of the legislative body.”
Applies to just one response, making it a
violation of the Brown Act regardless of whether
a majority of the legislative body read the
response. . . . .
Item 1 Page 24 of 134
Emojis = Discussion AB 992 prohibits a majority of the members of the legislative body from using social media to
“discuss among themselves” business of a specific
nature that is within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the legislative body.
Prohibits “communications made, posted, or
shared on an internet-based social media platform
between members of a legislative body, including
comments or use of digital icons that express
reactions to communications made by other
members of the legislative body.”
The prohibition against members “discussing
among themselves” specifically includes emojis.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under
CC BY-NC
. . . .
Item 1 Page 25 of 134
Hypothetical
Which of the following is a violation?
a) You post on social media and only
one other Director responds with
comments.
b) One Director “likes” your post.
c) One Director posts “ _” in response.
d) All of the above.
e) None of the above.
25 . . . .
Item 1 Page 26 of 134
Teleconferencing Meetings may be conducted by
teleconferencing (i.e., any electronic audio or
video connection) under the following
conditions:
Agendas must be posted at teleconference
locations specifying all teleconference
locations;
There is public access to teleconference
locations;
There is public opportunity to speak at each
teleconference location; and
All votes are taken by roll call.
26 . . . .
Item 1 Page 27 of 134
AB 2449 Additional Process for
Remote Meeting Attendance Just Cause Caregiving, Contagious illness, Disability Travel Notify legislative body of valid reason
Quorum present Only 2x’s a calendar
year
ER Circumstances Physical or family ER
prevents attendance
Must ask for approval
from Council
Can be addressed at
the meeting even if
didn’t get on the
agenda/or provide a
description of ER of 20
words or less (no
personal medical info)
No more than 3 months
or 20% of meetings in a
year
.
Quorum present . . .
Item 1 Page 28 of 134
AB 361
– Emergency
Teleconferencing
In response to COVID-19 and recognition of emergencies- earthquake; pandemic, civil unrest
Meetings may be held remotely without observing normal teleconferencing requirements if certain emergency findings are made
City Council must pass a Resolution making the above findings- Lasts for 30 day period Governor ended the State of Emergency due to COVID -19 February 28,
2022 therefore findings for AB 361 wont be able to be made if based on COVID-19
28 . . . .
Item 1 Page 29 of 134
Rules on Public Participation
:
Place must be open and accessible (ADA) Access to agenda materials Opportunity to speak on agenda items or on matters w/in agency jurisdiction
Opportunity to record meetings (if non-disturbing)
Additional time for non-English speakers
29 . . . .
Item 1 Page 30 of 134
Avoid These Headlines
[City] Flouts the Law: Locked
Doors, Elevators Keep Citizens
from Council Meeting
City helda council meeting at 10:00 AM. But allegedly none of the4 doors to meeting were open. There was an elevator that was only accessible to employees with cards. When
citizens confronted staff, onlya journalist was let in. 30 . . . .
Item 1 Page 31 of 134
We need thick skin
sometimes
City sued longtime critic of City Council
and lost and was ordered to pay
resident’s legal fees of $117,741.
City argued use of snippets of Council
meetings that were critical of Council
violated copyright law and caused
irreparable harm.
Court stated lawsuit
was “meritless”
31 . . . .
Item 1 Page 32 of 134
Brown Act: Agenda
Requirements
Rule: Brief description of
item (20 words or less)
Substantial
compliance is the
test.
Courts will look at
whether the agenda
language,
considered as a
whole, gives the
public more than a
"clue."
32 . . . .
Item 1 Page 33 of 134
Brown Act:
Internet Agenda Posting
Govt. Code §54954.2
An online posting of an agenda shall
be posted on the primary Internet
Web site homepage of a city …that
is accessible through a prominent,
direct link to the current agenda.
33 . . . .
Item 1 Page 34 of 134
Public Comment
During public comments on non-
agendized items a Councilmember may:
a) Have a 5-minute conversation with a
member of the public.
b) Approve a $5000 grant to the Farmer’s
Market if they ask and really need it.
c) Request donations to his/her political
campaign.
d) None of the above.
34 . . . .
Item 1 Page 35 of 134
Non
-Agendized Items
Action or discussion on any item not appearing on
the posted agenda is generally prohibited.
Officials may only: Briefly respond to public statements or questions.
Ask a question for clarification. Make a brief announcement. Make a brief report on his or her activities. Provide a reference to staff or other sources for factual information.
Request staff to place the matter on a future
agenda and report back to the legislative body in
a subsequent meeting.
§ 54954.2(a)(2)
35 . . . .
Item 1 Page 36 of 134
Requesting Items to be on the
Agenda City does not have a policy but has a
practice
Request during Council or Commission
Comments/Oral Reports
Can also be requested during the
discussion of another item
Make the request clear and concise so
staff and other Council members
understand the request . . . .
Item 1 Page 37 of 134
Hypothetical
The League sent an email to a councilmember
asking the City to take a position in support of
some upcoming legislation. You should:
a) Give direction to staff under council
comments to draft a letter on behalf of the City
providing support for the Council to sign.
b) Direct staff to return with the item on the
Agenda at the next Council meeting.
c) Forward the email to the CityManager to have
a draft letter prepared for the Councilmembers
to sign and send.
37 . . . .
Item 1 Page 38 of 134
Closed Sessions
Closed sessions are an exception to the rule
that agency meetings must be open and
public.
The disclosure of confidential information is
prohibited unless the legislative body
authorizes the disclosure of the information.
“Confidential information” means
communication made in closed session that is
specifically related to the basis for the closed
session meeting.
38 . . . .
Item 1 Page 39 of 134
AVOID THESE HEADLINES
DA’s Office Chastises Council – Spring 2020
A City Council was scolded for trying to uncover who complained that the Council had violated the state law regarding open meetings. The County District Attorney’s Office sent a letter to the City Council and City Attorney regarding allegations that they violated the Brown Act.
The letter and complaint stem from a July 8 meeting when the City Council held a closed-session discussion regarding threatened litigation, but abruptly voted to terminate contracts with the two nonprofit organizations.
There is no reading of the Brown Act that would allow the council to cite Cal. Gov. Code
§ 54956.9, go into closed session, and come
out to vote to terminate the contracts with the chamber and visitors bureau. On its face, the action taken during the closed session and the ensuing vote was a violation of the Brown Act,” District Attorney’s office.
39 . . . .
Item 1 Page 40 of 134
Brown Act Violations
Consequences
Request to Cure/Action Invalidated Civil Action to prevent future violations Costs and Attorney’s Fees Criminal Charges Each member of a legislative body who attends a meeting of that legislative body where action is
taken in violation of any provision of this chapter,
and where the member intends to deprive the
public of information to which the member knows or
has reason to know the public is entitled under this
chapter, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Gov. Code §§ 54959, 54960, 54960.1
40 . . . .
Item 1 Page 41 of 134
41 Access to Public Records
Access to public records is a
constitutional right in California . . . .
Item 1 Page 42 of 134
What is a Public
Record? Public Record” means: Any writing Containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business
Prepared, owned, used or retained by
any state or local City,
Regardless of physical form or
characteristic.
42 . . . .
Item 1 Page 43 of 134
Public Records
Rule: All of the City’s public records
must be disclosed to the public, upon
request, unless there is a specific reason
not to do so.
As described by one court: “Islands of
privacy floating in a sea of disclosure.”
43 . . . .
Item 1 Page 44 of 134
Avoid These Headlines
City Settles Lawsuit Over Alleged Public
Records Act Violation
Resident won access to records about mold
conditions at a neighbor's home as well as
$10,568 for attorney fees as part of a
settlement with the City.
44 . . . .
Item 1 Page 45 of 134
Avoid These Headlines
L.A. County has repeatedly violated state open records laws, L.A. Times lawsuit alleges
Mar 21, 2018
The Los Angeles Times has sued L.A. County, accusing it of repeatedly and routinely flouting laws designed to ensure government transparency.
Over the last year alone, county officials have refused to release information about the status of homicide
investigations, allegations of misconduct against prosecutors and even mundane information such as email addresses for Sheriff’s Department employees, the lawsuit says.
45 . . . .
Item 1 Page 46 of 134
Pop Quiz
Which of the following is a public record
subject to disclosure:
a) A message sent from your City email
account.
b) A message about City business sent from
your personal email account on your
personal device.
c) A message about City business sent from
your personal email account using a City
device.
d) All of the above.
46 . . . .
Item 1 Page 47 of 134
Personal Devices/Public Records
City of San Jose v. Superior Court
City employees‘ or officials’ communications about
official agency business may be subject to disclosure as “public records” retained by the agency under the
CPRA, even if the employees used personal e-mail or
text message accounts in their preparation or
transmission
47 . . . .
Item 1 Page 48 of 134
Expanded Scope of a Public Record Not every document is a “public record.” New Test: Does it relate in some substantive way to the conduct of the public’s business?
Or is it primarily personal?
Factors: content; context; purpose; audience;
was the individual acting within the scope of
their employment or office.
48 . . . .
Item 1 Page 49 of 134
49 Part II:
Personal Advantages
& Perks
Legal Limitations on
Official Benefits and Perks
. . . .
Item 1 Page 50 of 134
Pop Quiz
The salary of executive officials (City Manager,
Dept. Heads) may be approved:
a) Whenever they want.
b) At a regular meeting.
c) At a special meeting.
d) In closed session.
50 . . . .
Item 1 Page 51 of 134
Elected Officers
Compensation
Generally fixed by
statute.
Cannot be acted on at
a special meeting.
Automatic increases
not permitted.
51 . . . .
Item 1 Page 52 of 134
52 Expense Reimbursement
General Rule: Actual and Necessary Expenses
City Policy: Cities should have a written policy specifying reimbursable activities and rates
Reporting: Timely use of report forms (with receipts
documenting the expenses); oral report at subsequent
meeting in some cases
Penalty: loss of reimbursement privilege; restitution; civil penalties and 3x value of misused resources; jail; ban
from public office . . . .
Item 1 Page 53 of 134
Pop Quiz
If you take your spouse on official business,
you can charge the following to the City:
a) Room.
b) Spouse’s meals.
c) Mileage.
d) Both (a) and (c).
e) None of the above.
53 . . . .
Item 1 Page 54 of 134
54 Remember…
Your expense report forms are
PUBLIC RECORDS
. . . .
Item 1 Page 55 of 134
55 GIFTS
What is a Gift? Anything of value you receive
for which you do not provide
monetary or other
consideration of equal or
greater value.
May include discounts and
rebates if not also given to
the general public. Report
- $50 or more in
a year/source
Limit-
$590/year/source
$590
. . . .
Item 1 Page 56 of 134
Gifts
Options when you receive a gift over $50: Decide if you want to report it on your Form 700. -If yes, report on your Annual Form 700
If not, then within 30 days: Reimburse the donee for the fair market value, Return the gift unused, or Donate the gift to charity (no deductions). If the gift exceeds $590, you have a duty to: reject it or “buy down” the value. 56 . . . .
Item 1 Page 57 of 134
57 Disclosure of Gifts
Must report gifts on your Form
700 if: Total value of all gifts from that
source during the calendar year
is greater than $50.
Gift are reportable regardless of
the location of the donor.
Tip: If the amount is unknown, you
must make a good faith estimate
of the item’s fair market value. . . . .
Item 1 Page 58 of 134
Pop Quiz
When are meals not considered
“gifts”?
a) If provided at a party at a personal
residence.
b) You don’t know any other attendees
at the event.
c) You take turns paying for the meal.
d) You get food poisoning.
58 . . . .
Item 1 Page 59 of 134
Gifts
59 . . . .
Item 1 Page 60 of 134
Other Gifts
There is a rule for everything: Gifts through family members Attendance at Invitation-Only Events Wedding gifts Dating exception Behested Payments Travel See FPPC Guide: Limitations and Restrictions on
Gifts, Honoraria, Travel and Loans
60 . . . .
Item 1 Page 61 of 134
Gifts
FPPC Enforcement Decisions:
“J. L.” as a Mayor of City, failed to timely disclose gifts of two meals totaling $253.39 on his Statement of
Economic Interests. All gifts were from one consultant.
Penalty: $200.
Spurred by an investigation by the Ventura County
District Attorney’s Office into the activities of one city’s officials, the Fair Political Practices Commission found 205 government officials across the state failed to
properly report gifts from the same companies.
61 . . . .
Item 1 Page 62 of 134
Avoid These Headlines
Los Angeles -- Mayor and four city councilmen were fined for ethics violations for receiving gifts worth more than $100 and tickets to Hollywood's hottest awards shows, the city ethics commission voted Tuesday.
The mayor was fined $20,849 by the city commission. He
had earlier been fined $21,000 by the state's Fair Political Practice Commission.
62 . . . .
Item 1 Page 63 of 134
Gifts
FPPC Enforcement Decision
Fine: $6,500
“M. R.” Director of Recreation and Parks received gifts including free golf course access, range access, cart use, lessons and merchandise discounts that exceeded the reporting threshold of $50, and failed to report these gifts on his Annual Statements of Economic Interests. He also impermissibly influenced a governmental decision by assisting in the
negotiations of agreements with Valley Golf Course and
recommending to the City Council that it enter into and amend agreements with Valley Golf Course, which was the source of a gift that exceeded the annual gift limit.
63 . . . .
Item 1 Page 64 of 134
64 Prohibition on Gratuities or Rewards
It is a misdemeanor to receive any kind of
gratuity or reward for performing one’s duties. . . . .
Item 1 Page 65 of 134
Pop Quiz
Can public officials accept “tips” for a job
well done?
a) Never.
b) Always.
c) Only if you do an extra good job.
d) Yes, if you have a performance based
contract.
65 . . . .
Item 1 Page 66 of 134
66 Honoraria
Receipt of honoraria (e.g., any
payment for a speech, article,
attendance at a conference, event
or similar gathering) is prohibited
Exception: Speech or article in
connection with private business
Tip: You can return or donate the
honoraria within 30 days of
receipt. . . . .
Item 1 Page 67 of 134
Avoid These Headlines
Ex-member of governor's Cabinet pays $5,400 in ethics fines SACRAMENTO — A former member of Gov.
Schwarzenegger's Cabinet who resigned paid $5,400 in fines to a state watchdog agency for violating a ban on accepting speaking fees.
“R. M.” who led the State and Consumer Services
Agency for three years, resigned after the Los
Angeles Times reported that she had accepted
speaking fees, including $15,000 from Pfizer and
$13,500 from Bristol-Myers Squibb while the drug companies were lobbying her . 67 . . . .
Item 1 Page 68 of 134
68 Misuse of Public Resources Rule: No use of public funds or resources for personal, non -public
purposes, including campaigns. “Public Resources” includes staff time, office equipment and supplies, but excludes incidental or minimal uses. Penalties: disqualification from office, jail, civil penalties up to $1000/day plus 3x the value of the unlawful use. . . . .
Item 1 Page 69 of 134
69 Gifts of Public Funds Local agencies are
prohibited from making a
“gift” of public money or
anything of value.
Expenditures for public
purposes are not
considered gifts even if a
private party incidentally
benefits.
. . . .
Item 1 Page 70 of 134
Misuse of Public Resources
Current and former officials to be
tried for embezzlement
Current and former city officials were charged with
embezzlement. The charges stem from a series of trips
city officials made to New York allegedly to get a higher bond rating. During the trips, prosecutors said officials improperly used city money to treat themselves to
baseball games and Broadway shows that had nothing
to do with city business.
70 . . . .
Item 1 Page 71 of 134
POP QUIZ
Which are not permitted:
a) Making a few personal copies on the
agency copy machine.
b) Calling your spouse from an agency
phone.
c) Using an agency truck to pick up a
new mattress.
d) All of the above.
71 . . . .
Item 1 Page 72 of 134
Misuse of Public Resources
Top fire officials suspected of driving county vehicles while collecting $1,000 monthly personal car allowance. SAN BERNARDINO - San Bernardino County Fire Chief was placed on unpaid administrative leave Wednesday after county supervisors evaluated a human resources report alleging he and a Deputy Fire Chief improperly drove county vehicles for personal use. They reportedly used a county trailer to move personal belongings between 2 cities. The two may have also violated county policy by driving county vehicles while collecting a roughly $1,000 monthly personal car allowance.
72 . . . .
Item 1 Page 73 of 134
73 Mass Mailing Prohibition
Rule: No newsletter or other
mass mailing may be sent at
public expense.
Purpose: Conserve resources,
no advantages for incumbents
Application: 200+ items/month official “featured” Penalties: Criminal liability; restitution. . . . .
Item 1 Page 74 of 134
Avoid these Headlines
The Public Eye: City fined
$2,000 for newsletter
containing prohibited
photos
City was fined $2,000 by the California Fair
Political Practices Commission last week for
blanketing households with a newsletter that
contained photos of City Council members, a
violation of the Political Reform Act.
The State considers such activities a prohibited
form of campaigning with taxpayer funds that
gives incumbents an unfair advantage.
74 . . . .
Item 1 Page 75 of 134
75 Restrictions on Loans
Officials cannot receive loans: from anyone within the official’s City or with whom the City
contracts; or
greater than $500 (except in writing and with clear
terms)
Exceptions: loans received by the official’s campaign
committee; normal bank and credit indebtedness; and
loans from family members . . . .
Item 1 Page 76 of 134
76 Solicitations of Political Support Soliciting campaign funds from City officers or
employees is unlawful
(except when included as
part of a communication to a
significant segment of the
community).
Conditioning employment and
compensation decisions on
political support is also
prohibited. . . . .
Item 1 Page 77 of 134
77 Part III:
Personal Financial Gain
. . . .
Item 1 Page 78 of 134
78 Bribery & Extortion
Requesting, receiving, or agreeing to receive anything of value, including an “advantage,” in exchange for
official action, or using an official position to gain
something of value, is a crime.
Penalties: criminal fines, forfeiture of office and disqualification from office. . . . .
Item 1 Page 79 of 134
79 Bribery & Extortion
Mayor resigns after bribery arrest
Mayor steps down. A councilman and the former head of code enforcement are also accused of taking money from a marijuana clinic owner.
Mayor resigned after he, a councilman and a former official were charged in late June with federal bribery in an unfolding corruption scandal, officials said. The Councilmember and the former head of code enforcement, are accused of taking $17,000 in bribes from a marijuana dispensary owner who was working as an FBI informant. The officials allegedly took the bribes in exchange for their help in opening a store in the small blue-collar city, according to federal authorities. . . . .
Item 1 Page 80 of 134
80 Beverly Hills developer faces federal bribery charge in L.A. County lease deal
Real estate developer was arrested Wednesday on a felony charge of bribing a Los Angeles County employee in exchange for a government lease worth $45 million, federal law
enforcement officials said. . . . .
Item 1 Page 81 of 134
81 Conflicts of Interest Rules Political Reform Act Government Code §87100 and following, and the
Regulations of the Fair
Political Practices
Commission (FPPC)
Contractual Conflicts Government Code §1090 (FPPC and AG) . . . .
Item 1 Page 82 of 134
82 Purpose of Conflict Rules Public officials owe
paramount loyalty to
the public
Personal or private
financial interests
should not be allowed
to enter into the
decision making
process . . . .
Item 1 Page 83 of 134
83 Disclosure of Financial Interests Statements of
Economic Interests
“Form 700”
Purpose: alert officials of
personal interests that
might be affected
inform the public
about potential
conflicts
. . . .
Item 1 Page 84 of 134
84 The Who, What, When and Where of
Disclosure
Who? All “designated” officials. What? Interests in real property, investments, business positions,
sources of income and gifts.
When? Upon assuming office,
annually (by 4/1), and upon leaving
office.
Where? File with City Clerk, which
will send it, if required, to the
FPPC. (Online Process as well)
Note: The documents are public
records and late filers may face
fines or penalties. . . . .
Item 1 Page 85 of 134
Form 700 Reporting
FPPC Enforcement Decisions:
J. W., as a Member of the Sunshine
Ordinance Task Force for the City, and
failed to timely file the Annual Statement of
Economic Interests.
Fine: $200
85 . . . .
Item 1 Page 86 of 134
86 Can I Participate?
Conflict-of-Interest Rules
Political Reform Act
. . . .
Item 1 Page 87 of 134
87 General Rule of Disqualification A public official may not: - make/participate/influence - a governmental decision - that will have a foreseeable and material financial effect on
- the official’s economic interests . . . .
Item 1 Page 88 of 134
The Choice Is Yours
The best time to discuss a potential
conflict with the City’s Attorney is:
a) At a meeting because it is convenient
and will save money.
b) After the action/decision so you know
all the facts.
c) As early as possible.
d) Never, because it’s not a privileged
communication.
88 . . . .
Item 1 Page 89 of 134
89 Recognizing and Seeking Advice The conflict rules and regulations are complex.
Recognizing potential
conflicts is essential.
Talk early on with City
counsel and consider
seeking advice from the
FPPC when economic
interests may be
affected (positively or
negatively) by a decision. . . . .
Item 1 Page 90 of 134
Financial Interest Categories Source of Income Business management, employment or investment
Real Property Gifts Personal Financial Effect Campaign Contributions 90 . . . .
Item 1 Page 91 of 134
91 Economic Interests
Sources of Income
Any source of income
of $500 or more during
the prior 12 months for
you or your spouse or
domestic partner. . . . .
Item 1 Page 92 of 134
Economic Interests
92 FPPC Enforcement Decisions:
Assistant City Manager violated the conflict of interest disclosure and disqualification provisions by failing to disclose his interests in an Orange Julius franchise located in a shopping mall and by participating in decisions relating to a major expansion and restoration of the mall.
Fine: $18,000 . . . .
Item 1 Page 93 of 134
Economic Interests
FPPC Enforcement Decisions:
Robert S, a member of a city council, attempted to
use his official position to influence a governmental
decision in which he had a financial interest, by
speaking before the Planning Commission regarding
the approval of an application for the subdivision of
land owned by a client.
Fine: $3,000
93 . . . .
Item 1 Page 94 of 134
94 Economic Interests
Business management,
employment or investment Any business entity in which an official is a director,
officer, partner, trustee,
manager or employee.
Any business entity in which
an official has a direct or
indirect investment of
$2,000 or more.
. . . .
Item 1 Page 95 of 134
Economic Interests
95 FPPC Enforcement Decisions:
Robert B, while a member of a Utilities District Board of Directors, he made governmental decisions in which he knew, or had reason to know, he had a financial interest, by voting to approve numerous claim summaries that included payments made to a corporation in which he held the position of Director.
Fine: $12,000 . . . .
Item 1 Page 96 of 134
Economic Interests
FPPC Enforcement Decisions:
Simon L. was on the City Planning Commission. Prior to that, he was a member of the Design Review Committee for four years. While serving on the Design Review Committee, Simon L. twice voted in favor of applications submitted by clients of his architectural firm, in violation of Government Code Section 87100 (2 counts).
Simon L. also failed to disclose sources of income on the Statements of Economic Interests filed for his positions on the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission in violation of Government Code Sections 87202, 87204, and 87300 (2 counts).
Fine: $10,000
96 . . . .
Item 1 Page 97 of 134
Question
Interests in real property are:
a) A potential ground for a conflict of
interest.
b) Not a conflict if it is your home
because of the homestead exemption.
c) Not a problem as long as your property
is more than 300 feet away.
d) Always a conflict if the property is
within the City’s jurisdiction.
97 . . . .
Item 1 Page 98 of 134
98 Economic Interests
Real Property Any real property
interest worth $2,000 or more
Can includes leasehold interests
Be alert for any projects w/in 500
feet presumed material impact
Any decisions that may affect the
land use or value from 500 to
1000 feet.
Over 1,000 presumed not to have
a conflict
. . . .
Item 1 Page 99 of 134
Economic Interests
FPPC Enforcement Decisions:
A City Councilmember, violated conflict of interest laws by voting to obtain a $491,520 state grant to extend a
water and sewer line to an area of the city where he
owned real property and operated an inn and restaurant.
Fine: $4,000
99 . . . .
Item 1 Page 100 of 134
Economic Interests
Leasehold Interests Public official has a financial interest in a lease if the lease is for longer than one month and the official owes rent of $2,000 or more over a 12-month period.
The impacts of the decision on the official’s leasehold interests in residential or commercial property are
considered material if the decision will: Change the termination date of the lease; Increase or decrease the potential rental value of the property;
Change the official's actual or legally allowable
use of the real property; or
Impact the official's use and enjoyment of the real
property.
No distance parameters as there are for Real Property . . . .
Item 1 Page 101 of 134
Campaign contributions
State Law Effective January 1, 2023 City official prohibited from participating in making or, in any way attempting to influence the decision in a
proceeding involving a license, permit, entitlement for land use, contract (except competitively bid, labor or
employment contracts), or franchises
where the official has willfully or knowingly received a contribution exceeding $250 from a party, participant
or party/participant agent
12 months before the process and the officer knows or has reason to know of the party’s financial interest in the decision . . . .
Item 1 Page 102 of 134
Vernon’s Campaign contributions
Ordinance More Restrictive
$100 limit
VMC§ 2.28.010. Limitations on campaign
contributions.
No contributions may be given greater
than $100 to any candidate or committee
for each election
No contributions may be accepted greater
than $100 to any candidate or committee
for each election
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under
CC BY-SA
. . . .
Item 1 Page 103 of 134
103
Exceptions to Potential Economic Interest
Conflicts Two exceptions to
potential financial
conflicts: The “public
generally”
The “legally required
participation”
. . . .
Item 1 Page 104 of 134
104
Public Generally
Exception
Decisions that affect a broad
range of persons or interests
may be exempted: 25% of all
businesses, all real property,
or all individuals.
15% if only real property
interest is your home
Examples: Water rate
decisions; City wide Sign
Code ordinance . . . .
Item 1 Page 105 of 134
105
Legally Required Participation
Exception
May apply if a conflict disqualifies so many officials that there is no longer a quorum to make a decision.
Does not apply: (1) quorum could later be met; (2) to break a tie vote.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed
under CC BY-ND
. . . .
Item 1 Page 106 of 134
106
Conflicts Created By Future Employment
the revolving door…
May not participate in decisions
involving a prospective employer
(includes interviews and
negotiations).
Officials and senior management
may not represent parties before
their former City for one year after
leaving office.
. . . .
Item 1 Page 107 of 134
Conflicts Created By Future
Employment
FPPC Enforcement Decisions:
Kelli M, while acting in her capacity as a member of a
School District Board of Trustees voted to approve a
contract with the law firm for legal/professional for
an amount not to exceed $100,000. However, the day
before the vote, Kelli M. had received and
accepted a job offer from the same law firm.
Fine: $4,000
107
. . . .
Item 1 Page 108 of 134
108
Common Law Conflict:
Personal Interests or Bias
Personal interests or biases
(positive or negative) about the
facts or the parties may cast
doubt on your ability to make a
fair decision.
Need to exercise power with at
least the appearance of
disinterested skill, zeal, and
diligence. . . . .
Item 1 Page 109 of 134
Personal Interests or Bias
Procedural due process requires an unbiased
decision maker: Personal (non
-financial) interest in
outcome.
Bias of loyalty/friendship to individual
involved.
Informational bias due to receipt of
information outside of public hearing.
109
. . . .
Item 1 Page 110 of 134
Public Interest vs. Personal
Interest
City of Fairfield v. Superior Court (1975) 14 Cal.3d 768:
“A councilman has not only a right but an obligation to discuss issues of vital concern with his constituents and to state his views on matters of public importance. . . . Campaign statements…do not disqualify the candidate from voting on matters which come before him after his election.”
Nasha v. City of Los Angeles (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 470:
Plaintiff was seeking to develop five lots in Los Angeles. While the matter was pending before the Planning Commission, one of the Commissioners authored an article attacking the Plaintiff’s project.
The Planning Commission voted to deny the project and, in the lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff against the City of Los Angeles, the Court found that the Planning Commission’s decision should be set aside due to an unacceptable probability of actual bias on the part of the Commissioner who authored the article.
110
This Photo by
Unknown Author is
licensed under CC
BY-NC
. . . .
Item 1 Page 111 of 134
111
What Happens If Disqualified?
If disqualified: Identify the applicable interest (with specificity).
Step down from the dais and leave the
room/log off (unless on consent
calendar).
Refrain from any discussion or
participation.
Exception: You can participate as a member
of public from the audience on matters
affecting .personal economic interests. Limited . . .
Item 1 Page 112 of 134
Due Process and
Ex Parte Contacts
•“Ex parte” communications occur when
decision makers receive evidence outside
of the noticed hearing
• This can include site visits, speaking with
parties/witnesses, conducting outside
research, or reading social media
• Because the affected party has a right to
comment on the basis for the decision,
decision makers should either avoid ex
parte contacts, or should disclose any
facts gathered outside the hearing or ex
parte contacts at the very beginning of
the hearing
112
. . . .
Item 1 Page 113 of 134
113
Contractual Conflicts of Interest
Government Code
§1090
Section 1090 prohibits
officials and employees
from having financial
interests in contracts
made by them in their
official capacities or any
board of which they are
members. . . . .
Item 1 Page 114 of 134
Pop Quiz
When is it legal to enter into a contract with your agency:
a) If you use a third-party intermediary (e.g., real estate broker).
b) If you disclose your interest in advance to the Board and abstain from participating.
c) If you receive only a small payment or get less than fair market value.
d) If you are the best service provider available.
e) Never.
114
. . . .
Item 1 Page 115 of 134
115
Contractual Conflicts of Interest
If a public official or
employee has a
financial interest in a
contract, the contract
is prohibited
regardless of whether
the official participates
in or abstains from the
actual decision. . . . .
Item 1 Page 116 of 134
Avoid These Headlines
116
. . . .
Item 1 Page 117 of 134
117
Violations of § 1090
If contract is made in violation of §1090, the contract will be deemed void.
All monies paid under the
contract must be returned to
the local City.
Willful violations may be
punished by fine, imprisonment
and disqualification from public
office.. . . .
Item 1 Page 118 of 134
118
Contractual Conflicts of Interest There are also exceptions for: “Remote interests” (§1091) (landlord or tenant
of contracting party)
Still must abstain from voting “Non-interests” (§1091.5) (non-compensated officer
of a non-profit)
May vote . . . .
Item 1 Page 119 of 134
119
Contractual Conflicts of Interest
Interests Deemed Non-Interests:
Non-Profit Board Positions:
If a public official sits as a non-compensated member you may vote on a contract provided: The interest as a sitting Board Members is disclosed at the time first consideration of the contract and that is reflected in the minutes
City Commissions/Bodies: Government salary, per diem, reimbursement is deemed a non-interest in a contract.
. . . .
Item 1 Page 120 of 134
Part IV: General Ethical
Principles
Universal Ethical Values: Professional/Trustworthy Community First Respect Fairness 120
. . . .
Item 1 Page 121 of 134
121
Ethics Laws vs. Ethics
Law = minimum standards
What we must do
Floor - not the Ceiling
Ethics = What an official should do
. . . .
Item 1 Page 122 of 134
Be Professional
This value looks like: I come prepared to meetings, having read and studied any materials and information
provided to me.
I respect confidential information. I follow through and take responsibility for my actions.
I keep my knowledge and skills current.
122
. . . .
Item 1 Page 123 of 134
Question
There is an important City meeting
tomorrow, but you also have a major
project due at work. Should you:
a) Skim the meeting agenda package
during work breaks the best you can.
b) Have your spouse read the materials
and advise what to do.
c) Remain silent at the meeting and
consent to the staff recommendation.
d) None of the above.
123
. . . .
Item 1 Page 124 of 134
Community First
This value looks like: I make impartial decisions, free of narrow political interests and financial and other personal
interests that might impair my independence of
judgment or action.
I comply with both the spirit and the letter of the
law (Constitution, State law, City Code, City
Policies).
I do not use City resources or my position for
personal gain.
124
. . . .
Item 1 Page 125 of 134
Be Trustworthy
This value looks like: I act truthfully with the public, City officials, and staff. I use accurate information. I do what I say I will do. I use my title only when conducting official City business, carefully considering whether I am exceeding
or appearing to exceed my authority.
125
. . . .
Item 1 Page 126 of 134
Be Respectful
This value looks like: I treat people with courtesy and equitably.
I listen carefully. I am engaged – I ask questions. I involve staff. I work towards consensus. 126
. . . .
Item 1 Page 127 of 134
The Choice Is Yours
It’s acceptable to:
a) Reject an application because the
applicant is unpleasant.
b) Only consider City staff’s position on a
decision.
c) Encourage questions from members of the
public during meetings.
d) None of the above.
127
. . . .
Item 1 Page 128 of 134
Fairness
This value looks like: I focus on merits not on personalities. I promote public involvement. I provide more process than required. I consider all sides. I apply policies consistently. 128
. . . .
Item 1 Page 129 of 134
129
Final Questions to Ask What would inspire public
confidence?
What decision best serve
the interests of the
community as a whole?
. . . .
Item 1 Page 130 of 134
130
Public Perception
What would you want to
read about on the front
page?
Even if you are confident
about the “right thing to
do” – Don’t forget about
public perception.
The public needs to
believe that “the right
thing has been done.” . . . .
Item 1 Page 131 of 134
131
Public Perception
Some Good News….
. . . .
Item 1 Page 132 of 134
132
Resources
FPPC: 1-866-ASK-FPPC and on the
web at www.fppc.ca.gov
Attorney General: www.ca.ag.gov Cal Cities: www.cacities.org Institute for Local Government:
www.ca.ilg.org . . . .
Item 1 Page 133 of 134
Questions?
Thank You! . . . .
Item 1 Page 134 of 134