Victorville City Council
March 15, 2022

XIX. Utilities and Service Systems
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporate
d
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?

b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?

c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?

d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?

e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?

Discussion
a. The Proposed Project would be served by the Victorville Water District’s (VWD) existing water system which includes 10-inch lines on the south side of the Project Site within Nisqualli Road. The Project Proponent shall pay all connection and meter fees to VWD and adhere to VWD’s requirements for ensuring that the appropriate connections are made to the existing main. The VWD’s existing water system facilities are anticipated to be capable of meeting the Proposed Project’s water demand of approximately 37 acre-feet/year with no facility expansion required21.

The Proposed Project is within the Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority (VVWRA) service area. According to the 2019 Vic torville Sewer System Management Plan, the City owns approximately 437 miles of gravity sewers and 1.1 miles of force mains. There are two treatment plants that the City discharges its wastewater to; the VVWRA regional wastewater treatment plant and the Ci ty of

21 Water Feasibility Study (WFS), February 3, 2020, Water Systems Consulting, Inc.

Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments Project June 2021 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lilburn Corp

Victorville’s Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant (IWWTP). Approximately 80% of sewer flows are conveyed to the VVWRA regional wastewater treatment plant. The remaining 20% of the collected sewer flows are discharged to the City -owned IWWTP. The Pr oposed Project would connect to the existing sewer system lines east and west of the Project Site and includes a sewer easement along the eastern Project Site boundary.

Stormwater runoff volumes would be directed into the proposed infiltration basin and overflow would drain to Winona Street, into the existing stormwater drainage system. The Proposed Project is not anticipated to substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in substantial erosion, siltation, or flooding on- or off-site.

Southern California Edison (SCE) provides electrical service to the project area. T he Proposed Project would receive electrical power through connection to Southern California Edison’s existing underground power lines between Jasmine Street and Lindero Street, approximately one mile south of the Project Site.

Southwest Gas provides natur al gas service to the vicinity and the Proposed Project Site. The Proposed Project would receive natural gas from Southwest Gas Company through connection to lines into be extended in Niqualli Road. Verizon and Charter provide telecommunication services to the vicinity of the area. Residential development of the Proposed Site has been included in the utility providers’ plans and therefore all utilities necessary to serve the Proposed Project are of sufficient capacity and no expansion would be required. The Proposed Project is not anticipated to require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electrical power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocat ion of which could cause significant environmental effects. No significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

b. A Water Feasibility Study (WFS), dated February 3, 2020, was completed by Water Syst ems Consulting, Inc. to estimate the Proposed Project’s water demands, ensure sufficient water supplies would be available, and determine any necessary water system improvements. Water demands for the Proposed Project were estimated using water demand projections presented in the 2015 Victorville Water District Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) . Table 5‐7 and 5‐8 in the 2015 UWMP present water demand projections for multi‐family residential (MDR) services in Ye ar 2020, which total 1,984 acre‐ft per year (AFY) for an estimated 636 connections. 22 These projections correspond to a demand factor of 3.1 AFY per MDR connection, or 2,783 gallons per day (gpd). For the WFS, it is assumed that the Proposed Project would require 13 connections, which corresponds to the number of proposed residential buildings plus one connection for the office, gym and pool area within the Project Site. Using this methodology, the total estimated water demand for the Proposed Project is 36,200 gpd.

The District’s current water supply consists of 35 active wells, which pump from the Upper Mojave Groundwater Basin, and two turnouts from the Mojave Water Agency’s Regional Recharge and Recovery Project (R3), which pump from a seasonal storage aquifer that is recharged with imported water. Available supply for the Project was evaluated on the basis of total system firm capacity. The 2019 Water Master Plan (WMP) calculated firm capacity with the two largest wells and the R3 supply being out of service.

With these facilities out of service, the firm capacity of the system is 31,903 gpm. The 2019 WMP supply criteria state that firm capacity should be greater than Maximum day demand (MDD). The current system

22 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for Victorville Water District. Page 18.

Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments Project June 2021 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lilburn Corp

MDD as of 2017 is 23,483 gpm; this includes estimated demands for proposed projects which have been previously evaluated based on the City of Victorville 2010 Water Master Plan (2010 WMP) and the 2019 WMP and app roved, but not yet constructed. Therefore, there is a current system wide firm capacity surplus of 8,420 gpm. The addition of the Project would decrease this surplus to 8,385 gpm. The firm capacity analysis shows that the system currently has sufficient firm capacity to meet the MDD.

The WFS concluded that adequate storage is available to serve the Proposed Project and the water system has sufficient firm capacity to meet the MDD conditions. The project will need to construct approximately 660 feet of 8‐inch pipeline. The hydraulic analysis indicated that, with the installation of these pipelines, the system pressures, velocities, and fire flow capacities will meet the criteria identified in the 2019 WMP.

The exact number and location of domestic and fire s ervice laterals shall be coordinated and confirmed with the City during design. No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.

c. A Sewer Feasibility Report (SFR), dated February 17, 2020, was complet ed by David Evans and Associates, Inc. 23 to evaluate the hydraulic capacity of the downstream City sewers in relation to the Proposed Project. The SFR assumed Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) would be completed by the City.

Without the CIP, the Existing (2015) and Future (2040) conditions would be deficient in various stretches of pipe even without the introduction of the Proposed Project. According to the City’s Sewer Master Plan (SMP), a total of three capacity improvement projects comprised of 44 sewer segments consisting of 11,320 linear feet (2.1 miles) of replacement sewers are recommended for upsizing the existing sewers along the same alignments to alleviate the identified capacity deficiencies , as of 2016 .24 The Proposed Project includes preferred proposed points of connection (POCs) proposed along Winona Street. The developer would install a 60-inch inside diameter manhole per city standards at the POC.

Based on the findings of the SFR, the existing City sewers, wi th implementation of the City’s CIP, will have sufficient capacity to convey the additional wastewater flows from the Proposed Project. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.

d-e. According to the General Plan, the City of Victorville disposes sanitary waste at the Victorville Sanitary Landfill, which is operated by the Solid Waste Management Division of the San Bernardino County Public Works Department in accordance with a Waste Disposal Agreement between the City and the County.25 The Victorville Sanitary Landfill has a capacity of 3,000 tons per day.26 According to the California Integrated Waste Management Board’s estimated solid waste generation rates, a total of approximately four pounds per dwelling unit per day is estimated for multi-family residential development.27 The Proposed Project would therefore generate an estimated 848 pounds per day or

0.4 tons per day. The Proposed Project’s demand would represent approximately 0.014 percent of the total permitted tons day. Construction debris would also be recycled and/or transported to the Victorville Sanitary Landfill. The temporary generation of construction debris would not permanently affect the long- term landfill capacity. Additionally, the Proposed Project would comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, including the Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991. The Act requires that adequate areas be provided for collecting and loading recyclable materials

23 Sewer Feasibility Report (SFR), February 17, 2020, David Evans and Associates, Inc. 24 City of Victorville Sewer Master Plan. Page 70.
25 City of Victorville General Plan. Page LU-16.
26 https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/1870?siteID=2652. Accessed 5/25/21. 27 https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates. Multifamily generation rates. Accessed 5/25/21.

Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments Project June 2021 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lilburn Corp

such as paper products, glass, and other recyclables. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.

References
City of Victorville General Plan 2030. 2008.

CalRecycle. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Accessed May 25, 2021.

CalRecycle. SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details: Victorville Sanitary Landfill. Accessed May 25, 2021 from https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/1870?siteID=2652

David Evans and Associates, Inc. Sewer Feasibility Report. February 17, 2020.

Water Feasibility Study. Water Systems Consulting, Inc.. February 3, 2020.

Water Systems Consulting, Inc. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for Victorville Water District.

June 6, 2016.

Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments Project June 2021 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lilburn Corp

XX. Wildfire
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?

d. Expose people or structures to significant r isks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?

Existing Environmental Setting
Due to the location of the Project Site and the surrounding land uses, wildland fire hazard would be minimal. Review of the CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer identifies that the City of Victorville is located in a Local Responsibility Area (LRA). The Project Site is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.

Discussion
a. The CALFIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer shows that the Project Site is not within a fire hazard severity zone. The Project Site does not contain any emergency facilities, nor is located adjacent to an emergency evacuation route. During construction and long -term operation, the contractor would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicle s as required by the City of Victorville fire and police. The Proposed Project would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.

b-d. The Project Site is relatively flat and is not located in an area known to have slope hazards, according to Figure S-3 Slope Hazards of the City’s General Plan. 28 The Project Site is also not located in an area known to contain flood hazards as shown on Figure S-2 Flood Hazards Map of the City’s General Plan.29 Access to the site would be via Winona Street and Balsam Road, which are existing roads. The Project

28 City of Victorville General Plan. Figure S-3/Page S-8. 29 City of Victorville General Plan. Figure S-2/Page S-6.

Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments Project June 2021 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lilburn Corp

Site is approximately 0.3 miles east of Interstate -15, which is a County-assigned emergency evacuation route. Implementation of the Proposed Project would not include any risks including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides as a result of runoff post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes .

The Proposed Project is anticipated to be sufficiently served by existing infrastructure and utilities and would not require the installation or maintenance of additional infrastructure.

Although the Project Site is not associated with wildfire risks, the Proposed Proje ct would be developed in compliance with the Fire Hazard Abatement Ordinance (Chapter 8.09, Victorville Municipal Code) and measures in the California Building Code (CBC) which reduce fire hazards in structures. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.

References
CALFIRE, Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer, Accessed May 25, 2021 at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/

City of Victorville Municipal Code. Chapter 8.09 Fire Hazard Abatement Ordinance. 2021.

Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments Project June 2021 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lilburn Corp

XXI. Mandatory Finding of Significance Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or a nimal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?

b. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?

c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?

Discussion
a. The project would not decrease the quality of the environment, reduce fish or wildlife population , or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-3, Mitigation Measure GEO -1 and Mitigation Measures TCR -1 and TCR-2 impacts to cultural and biological resources would be less than significant. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no additional mitigation measures are required.

b. Cumulative impacts are defined as two or more individual affects that, when considered together, are considerable or that compound or increase other environmental impacts. The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment that re sults from the incremental impact of the development when added to the impacts of other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable or probable future developments. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor, but collectively significant, developments taking place over a period. The CEQA Guidelines, Section 15130 (a) and (b), states:

(a) Cumulative impacts shall be discussed when the project’s incremental effect is cumulatively considerable.

Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments Project June 2021 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lilburn Corp

(b) The discussion of cumulative impacts shall reflect the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion need not provide as great detail as is provided of the effects attributable to the project. The discussion should be guided by the standards of practicality and reasonableness.

Impacts associated with the Proposed Project would not be considered individually or cumulatively adverse or considerable. Impacts identified in this Initial Study can be reduced to a less than significant impact. Therefore, no signifi cant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.

c. The incorporation of design measures, City of Victorville policies, standards, and guidelines and proposed mitigation measures would ensure that the Proposed Project would have no substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly on an individual or cumulative basis. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.

PLANNING COMMISSION

ATTACHMENT G
Negative Declaration and Monitoring Plan

CITY OF VICTORVILLE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, California 92392
(760) 955-5135 FAX (760) 245-8250

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Preparation Date: December 2, 2021

Name or Title of Project: Site Plan Case No. PLAN20-00009 (Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments).

Location: Adjacent to Balsam Rd., between Nisqualli Rd. and Winona St. ; APN: 3092-401-01, -02 and - 10; City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino

Entity or Person Undertaking Project: Aziz, LLC 495 E Rincon Street, Suite #175; Corona, CA 92879

Description of Project: A Site Plan to allow for the development of a 212 -unit residential apartment development on three parcels. Approval of a Zone Change and General Plan Amendment are part of the Application and would be required for one of the parcels to change the General Plan designation from Commercial to High Density Residential and to change the zoning from General Commercial (C-2) to Multi- Family Residential (R-4). The Proposed Project includes 212 apartment units, three laundry rooms, one clubhouse and a rental office, plus amenities.

Statement of Findings: The City of Victorville Planning Commission has reviewed the Initial Study for this proposed project and has found that there are no adverse environmental impacts to either the man-made or physical environmental setting if the following mitigation measures are implemented in conformance with the Mitigation Monitoring Policy, and does hereby direct staff to file a Notice of Determination, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

A copy of the Initial Study and other applicable documents used to support the proposed Negative Declaration is available for review at the City of Victorville Planning Division.

Mitigation Measures:

Biological Measures:

1. (BIO-1): Pre-construction surveys for burrowing owls, desert tortoise, and nesting birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Section 3503 of the California Fish and Wildlife Code shall be conducted prior to the commencement of Project -related ground disturbance.

A. Appropriate survey methods and timeframes shall be established, to ensure that chances of detecting the target species are maximized. In the event that listed species, such as the desert tortoise, are encountered, authorization from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and CDFW must be obtained. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance measures shall be implemented to ensure that nests are not disturbed until after young have fledged.

B. Pre-construction surveys shall encompass all areas within the potential footprint of disturbance for the project, as well as a reasonable buffer around these areas

2. BIO-2: Prior to the implementation of the recommended measures outlined in the Protected Plant Preservation Plan, an ITP shall be obtained from CDFW for any Joshua Tree on -site removed from its current position as deemed applicable by the CDFW. CDFW may require Site Plan Case No. PLAN20-00009
Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments
tc

the preparation of additional habitat assessments prior the issu ance of an ITP; any such requirement, as well as mitigation for the loss of trees will be established by CDFW and incorporated into the City’s adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Proposed Project.

Cultural Resource Measures:

3. (CUL-1):In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered areas may continue during this assessment period.

Additionally, the SMBMI Cultural Resources Department shall be contacted, as detailed within Mitigation Measure TCR-1, regarding any pre-contact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

4. (CUL-2): If significant pre -contact and/or historic -era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within Mitigation Measure TCR -1. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly.

5. (CUL-3): If, at any time, human remains or suspected human remains are identified within the Proj ect Site, the Contractor will halt work in the immediate vicinity of the find and establish a buffer zone around the find. If the archaeological consultant is on -site, the archaeological consultant will oversee the level of protection. The City will be immediately notified and the City will contact the County Coroner (within 24 hours). The Coroner has the authority to examine the find in situ and make a determination as to the nature of the find:

A. If the remains are determined to be human, the Coroner will determine whether or not they are likely of Native American origin. If so, the Coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission and the Commission will name the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). In consultation between the City, Property Owner, MLD , and consulting archaeologist, the disposition of the remains will be defined. If there is a conflict, the Native American Heritage Commission with act as a mediator.

B. If the remains are determined to be archaeological, but not of Native American origin, the City, Property Owner and archaeological consultant will determine the management of the find and the removal from the site. The Property Owner would be responsible for any costs related to the removal, analysis, and reburial.

C. If the remains are determined to be of forensic value, the Coroner will arrange for the removal of the remains and oversee the analysis and disposition.

Geology and Soils Measures:

6. (GEO-1): Should older Quaternary Alluvial deposits be encountered during site preparation activities, a qualified paleontologist shall oversee the excavations to ensure that any paleontological specimens are identified, recovered, analyzed, reported, and curated in accordance with CEQA and the County of Riverside policies and guidelines. This program should be conducted while these older deposits are impacted and while the paleontological consultant deems the program necessary.

Site Plan Case No. PLAN20-00009
Balsam and Winona Victorville Apartments
tc

Tribal Cultural Resources Measures:

7. (TCR-1): The SMBMI Cultural Resources Department shall be contacted, as detailed in Mitigation Measure CUL -1, of any pre -contact and/or historic -era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site.

8. (TCR-2): Any and all archaeologica l/cultural documents created as part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and City of Victorville for dissemination to SMBMI. The City of Victorville and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project.

Public Review Period: December 3, 2021 through January 3, 2022.

Tentative Public Hearing Date: February 9, 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN20-00009

SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN20-00009 1 December 2021

The following mitigation measures have been identified for Case No. PLAN20-00009; A Site Plan with a Mitigated Negative Declaration to allow for the development of a 212 unit mu lti-family apartment complex and a General Plan Amendment from Commercial to High Density Residential and a Zone Change from C-2 General Commercial to R-4 Very High Density Residential on a portion of the site on property located at the Southeast corner of Balsam Road and the logical extension of Winona Street.

A completed and signe d checklist for each measure indicates that a measure has been implemented, and fulfills the City’s monitoring requirements with respect to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN20-00009

SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN20-00009 2 December 2021

Mitigation Measures
Responsible
Party
Timing of
Compliance
Signature and Date
of Compliance
Biological Measures
(BIO-1): Pre-construction surveys for burrowing owls, desert tortoise, and nesting birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Section 3503 of the California Fish and Wildlife Code shall be conducted prior to the commencement of Project-related ground disturbance.

A. Appropriate survey methods and timeframes shall be established, to ensure that chances of detecting the target species are maximized. In the event that listed species, such as the desert tortoise, are encountered, authorization from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and CDFW must be obtained.

If nesting birds are detected, avoidance measures shall be implemented to ensure that nests are not disturbed until after young have fledged.

B. Pre-construction surveys shall encompass all areas within the potential footprint of disturbance for the project, as well as a reasonable buffer around these areas

Project Developer

Project Biologist
Prior to project
grading and
construction activities

BIO-2: Prior to the implementation of the recommended measures outlined in the Protected Plant Preservation Plan, an ITP shall be obtained from CDFW for any Joshua Tree on -site removed from its current position as deemed applicable by the CDFW. CDFW may require the preparation of additional habitat assessments prior the issuance of an ITP; any such requirement, as well as mitigation for the loss of trees will be established by CDFW and incorporated into the City’s adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Proposed Project.

Project Developer

Project Biologist
Prior to and during
project grading and
construction activities

Cultural Resource Measures
(CUL-1):In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work o n the other portions of the Project Developer

Project Construction
Superintendent
Implementation on-
going during
construction

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN20-00009

SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN20-00009 3 December 2021

project outside of the buffered areas may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the SMBMI Cultural Resources Department shall be contacted, as detailed within Mitigation Measure TCR-1, regarding any pre -contact a nd/or historic -era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

Project
Archaeologist
(CUL-2): If significant pre -contact and/or historic -era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI f or review and comment, as detailed within Mitigation Measure TCR -1. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly.

Project Developer

Project Construction
Superintendent

Project
Archaeologist
Implementation on-
going during
construction

(CUL-3): If, at any time, human remains or suspected human remains are identified within t he Project Site, the Contractor will halt work in the immediate vicinity of the find and establish a buffer zone around the find.

If the archaeological consultant is on -site, the archaeological consultant will oversee the level of protection. The City will be immediately notified and the City will contact the County Coroner (within 24 hours). The Coroner has the authority to examine the find in situ and make a determination as to the nature of the find:

A. If the remains are determined to be human, the Corone r will determine whether or not they are likely of Native American origin.

If so, the Coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission and the Commission will name the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). In consultation between the City, Property Owner, MLD, and consulting archaeologist, the disposition of the remains will be defined. If there is a conflict, the Native American Heritage Commission with act as a mediator.

B. If the remains are determined to be archaeological, but not of Native American or igin, the City, Property Owner and
archaeological consultant will determine the management of the find and the removal from the site. The Property Owner would be responsible for any costs related to the removal, analysis, and Project Developer

Project Construction
Superintendent

Project
Archaeologist
Implementation on-
going during
construction

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN20-00009

SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN20-00009 4 December 2021

reburial.

C. If the remains are determined to be of forensic value, the Coroner will arrange for the removal of the remains and oversee the analysis and disposition.

Geology and Soils Measures
(GEO-1): Should older Quaternary Alluvial deposits be encountered during site preparation activities, a qualified paleontologist shall oversee the excavations to ensure that any paleontological specimens are identified, recovered, analyzed, reported, and curated in accordance with CEQA and the County of San Bernardino policies and guidelin es.

This program should be conducted while these older deposits are impacted and while the paleontological consultant deems the program necessary.

Project Developer

Project
Paleontologist
During initial
excavations and
implementation on-
going during
grading/construction
as determined by
Paleontologist

Tribal Cultural Resource Measures
(TCR-1): The SMBMI Cultural Resources Department shall be contacted, as detailed in Mitigation Measure CUL -1, of any pre -contact and/or historic -era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site.

Project Developer

Project
Archaeologist

Project Construction
Superintendent
Implementation on-
going during
construction

PLANNING COMMISSION

ATTACHMENT H
Aerial Image

CASE: PLAN20-00009
Case Type: Site Plan, General Plan Amendment and
Zone Change
Existing Zoning: R-4 (High Density Residential) and C-2 General Commercial
Project Size: Approximately 12 Acres
Location: Southeast Corner of Balsam Rd and Winona St
Assessor Parcel Number: 3092-401-01, 02, 10
N
SITE
Item Number: 2
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing(s)
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

John Mendiola, Finance Director / City Treasurer

Subject:

Mid-Year Budget Review and Amendment Request to the 2021-22 Fiscal Budget Recommendation:

That the City Council and Board of Directors approve the changes reflected in this agenda item along with the included attachments by adopting:
Resolution No. 22-018 of the City Council amending Resolution 21-064, as amended, the budget resolution for the City of Victorville for the Fiscal Year 2021- 2022
Resolution No. VWD-22-001 of the Victorville Water District amending Resolution 21-012, as amended, the budget resolution for the Victorville Water District for the Fiscal Year 2021-2022
Resolution No, SCLAA-22-004 of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority amending Resolution 21-005, as amended, the budget resolution for the City of Victorville for the Fiscal Year 2021-2022
Fiscal Impact:

A summary of the mid-year budget changes are as follows: (details of the changes are found in Attachment A)
City of Victorville – An appropriation of funds, increasing the expenditures by $2,160,976.77 and increasing the revenue by $19,547,742. Victorville Water District – An appropriation of funds, increasing the expenditures by $11,447,300 and increasing the revenue by $4,733,500. Southern California Logistics Airport Authority – An appropriation of funds, increasing expenditures by $330,200 and increasing the revenue by $645,229.

Approval of this agenda item would increase total expenditure budget for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 by $13,938,476.77 and increase the total combined revenue budget for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 by $24,926,471.
2 4
7 0
Background:

The Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget, effective July 1, 2021, was adopted by the City Council/Board of Directors on June 15, 2021. Since that time, staff has completed a quarterly review to evaluate the overall performance of the City’s finances and allow for some insight as to possible future needs. The mid-year budget review is an opportunity for staff to use actual operating results through the first half of the fiscal year and provide an update to the findings of the first quarter review. Additionally, this provides staff an opportunity to recommend adjustments to the budget needed to accommodate changes in revenue and expenditure estimates, programs, and staffing needs.

The following report compares and summarizes projected revenues and expenditures by the General Fund, Measure P, Special Revenue Funds and then Enterprise Funds.

Discussion:

The chart below provides a City-wide summary of revenues and expenditures from the adopted budget, revised budget, and mid-year projections for the 2021-22 fiscal year.

The column labeled FY 21/22 Revised Budget is the Council-approved budget in addition to any Council-approved resolutions for additional appropriations. The 2021-22 budget, as adopted by the City Council, initially assumed a one-time use of the General Fund reserve balance in the amount of $2.08 million. Of this amount, $1 million in loan repayments back to the General Fund was anticipated and received from the Victorville Municipal Utilities Services. The net of these two figures created a budgeted and anticipated draw on General Fund reserves of $1.08 million. Based on current revenue projections, staff anticipates a contribution to the General Fund at the end of the fiscal year rather than a draw down. Four of the major contributors to the increased revenue projections include:
Increased General Accounts revenues of $15.4 Million
Increased Permitting revenues in the Building and Engineering departments of $1.47 Million and Code Compliance Cite and Cost Recovery of $1.03 Million Increased Water revenue of $4.7 Million
Increased Airport revenue of $645 Thousand
FY 2021-22 City of Victorville Budget Summary as of December 31, 2021 Citywide
FY21/22
Adopted
Budget
FY21/22
Revised
Budget
Mid-Year
Proposed
Budget
Difference
Increase
(Reduce)
Revenue 306,529,379 320,536,203 345,462,674 24,926,471
Expenditures 279,238,605 320,225,894 334,164,371 13,938,477 General Fund Revenue Review:

Sales Tax and Property Tax
The City has contracted with HdL Companies, which has served public agencies with revenue solutions since 1983. HdL brings a comprehensive and tailored approach to 2 4
7 0
maximizing and understanding public agency revenues. The charts below detail key sectors and were used to assist staff in making assumptions on how to project future sales taxes based upon recent historical data provided by HdL. The charts are intended to demonstrate major changes in a few key sectors only and are not a comprehensive sector-by-sector look at all factors that comprise sales and use taxes.

The first chart shows sales and use tax allocation by sector for the City’s 3rd Tax Quarter (July – Sept) of 2021 compared with the City’s 3rd Quarter of 2020. Tax quarters are based upon a calendar year beginning January 1, where the City budget is based on a fiscal year beginning July 1.

Sales and Use Tax by Sector
(Victorville) 3Q 2021 3Q 2020
%
Change
Autos and Transportation 1,942,356.00 1,639,884.00 18%
Fuel and Service Stations 909,108.00 600,175.00 51%
General Consumer Goods 1,783,735.00 1,533,653.00 16%
Restaurants and Hotels 807,047.00 649,828.00 24%
County & State Pool
(Includes Online Sales)
1,106,818.00 1,192,749.00 -7%
The above chart does not include every sector comprising sales tax total The second chart shows the forecast amounts compared to the actual for sales tax distributions from the State. The chart demonstrates that the 1st Quarter sales tax distributions (July – Sept 2021) exceeded the initial projection, and revenues into the 2nd Quarter continue to exceed projections. It is currently expected that overall Sales and Use Tax revenues will continue to outpace original forecasts as the data to model this on continues to come in. It should be noted that the final payment received in a quarter for Sales Tax Revenue received from the State is what is known in the industry as a “true up” payment. While the original forecast of revenues received by mid-year was estimated at $10.0 million, to date the City has received $12.3 million. Given that actuals received have outpaced original projections, HdL, along with City staff, have updated future forecasts.

Sales Tax Allocation Cash Actuals and
Projections by Finance Staff Actual Forecast
%
Change
July 2021 Sales Tax Revenue 2,484,088.00 1,736,100.00 43% August 2021 Sales Tax Revenue 3,302,629.00 1,736,100.00 90% September 2021 Sales Tax Revenue 1,812,983.00 2,902,257.00 -38% October 2021 Sales Tax Revenue 2,428,921.00 1,834,200.00 32% November 2021 Sales Tax Revenue 2,274,180.00 1,834,200.00 23% Subtotal 12,302,801.00 10,042,857.00 22%
December 2021 Sales Tax Revenue TBD 3,066,308.00
Forecast provided by HdL and Finance Staff
2 4
7 0
Property taxes are trending slightly higher than FY 2020-21 actual and are expected to at least match prior year ending amount of $19.5 Million based on current housing information.

Overview of Major Changes and Recommended Adjustments by Fund Type:

General Fund (Fund 100):
As discussed above, projections for sales and property tax revenues are higher than budgeted in the General Fund. The first five months of Sales and Use Tax revenue collected have demonstrated an actual excess of almost $2.3 Million in funds received. This total increase combined with increases to the Building, Engineering, and Code Compliance revenues of $2.3 Million contribute to project a total increase in revenues of $10.1 Million.
Although there are new positions being requested for a Homelessness Services Manager, a Technology Technician and an IT Secretary, the reductions made in code compliance, library, and recreation departments actually are decreasing the overall general fund expenditures by $239 Thousand, even with the requested addition of these positions.

The combination of the additional $9 Million in General Fund reserves from FY 2020-21 brings the beginning available fund balance to $25.2 Million and with the changes at mid- year, the General Fund is anticipated to have an ending fund balance of $32.6 million.

The current General Fund reserve policy goal is 17%. The updated projected ending fund balance will reach 41%.

Measure P (Fund 105):

On November 3, 2020, during the general election, the majority of voters of the City approved Measure P, which is a 1% Transactions and Use tax. The passing of this Measure will bring additional resources to the City which will be used toward the betterment of the daily lives for those who live and visit. At the Council meeting of May 19, 2020 there was a presentation from the City Manager of the Public Safety Plan in order to share the needs of each sector for the enhancement of the safety and services provided to those within the City. Each department has several levels of needs, and the appropriate levels will be met depending on the more accurate projection of revenues to be generated by the Measure.

Projections for the first quarter of transactions and use tax was the final quarter of FY 2020-21 and projections were for $4 Million in revenue. Actuals came in at $7.1 Million.

Projections provided by HdL at the start of FY 2021-22 were $18.9 Million and with the first five months of revenue received, the projections have increased to $26.35 Million based on receipts of almost $9.5 Million. This revenue continues to support our Public Safety Plan needs with additional staffing and equipment to provide the additional service level to the community.
2 4
7 0
Measure P is currently on track to have a fund balance of $10 Million at the end of FY 2021-22. Using the same 17% reserve as General Fund (100) as a target, the Measure P fund is estimated to have an ending fund balance reserve of 21%.

Special Revenue Funds:
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 (Fund 233) increased expenditures by $139,027 to cover wages and contract service for bus stop improvements.
LMADs and DFADs (Fund 370) increased expenditure budget by $228,000 to cover increased utility costs and block wall repairs.

Enterprise Funds:

Sanitary Sewer (Fund 425)
Increase of $940 Thousand to expenditures for treatment fee paid to VVWRA for bypass flows from IWWTP to VVWRA
Solid Waste (Fund 426)
Revenue increase of $1.86 Million based on current growth Expenditures increase of $1.08 Million primarily for increased growth/hauling charges
Water (Funds 410-413)
Increase to Revenue of $4.7 Million resulting from higher than expected consumption
Increase to Expenses of $11.4 Million primarily for the purchase of permanent water rights
Southern California Logistics Airport Authority (Fund 450) Revenue increase of $645 Thousand from new lease agreements Expenditures increase $330 Thousand primarily for maintenance work for new tenants
Conclusion:

Budgeting for unknown factors during a global pandemic has proven to be challenging.

While still navigating the pandemic and providing as many services as possible to the citizens, the City has continued to make changes needed to continue serving our community. Due to COVID-19 related-revenues that were previously unanticipated, and other factors such as increased online Sales and Use Tax revenue, the end of year General Fund balance is currently expected to experience a net positive impact of approximately $7.7 Million over the beginning of year fund balance. The unanticipated revenues, most of which were one-time funds that came from the CARES Act and ARPA, allowed the City to recapture COVID-19 public safety related payroll expenses which would have otherwise been borne by the General Fund. The City continues to diligently search for additional revenue resources to help not only the community, but also maintain 2 4
7 0
fiscal stability so that future resources are available Any budgets that are currently projected to be over-budget at the end of the year have been addressed with the appropriations requests, but will be continuously monitored.

Staff remains available for any questions.

Attachments: A. Mid-Year Budget Summary
B. Resolution No. 22-018
C. Resolution No. VWD-22-001
D. Resolution No. SCLAA-22-004

ATTACHMENT A
AIRPORT MID‐YEAR BUDGET DETAIL
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION FY21/22 BUDGET
FY21/22 REVISED
BUDGET

PROJECTED
(INCREASE) /

DECREASE

MID YEAR

PROPOSED
BUDGET
GENERAL ACCOUNTS (87,546,342.64)$ (87,546,342.64) $ (15,390,877.00) $ (102,937,219.64)$ FINANCE (52,000.00) $ (52,000.00) $ - $ (52,000.00)$ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (280,000.00)$ (280,000.00) $ - $ (280,000.00)$ FACILITIES (32,427.24) $ (129,767.87) $ - $ (129,767.87)$ LIBRARY (69,000.00) $ (69,000.00) $ 23,250.00 $ (45,750.00) $ PARKS (313,423.95) $ (313,423.95) $ - $ (313,423.95)$ RECREATION (781,005.00) $ (781,005.00) $ 419,738.00 $ (361,267.00) $ SOLID WASTE (20,760,550.00) $ (20,760,550.00) $ (1,855,500.00) $ (22,616,050.00)$ ANIMAL CONTROL (96,100.00) $ (96,100.00) $ (56,000.00) $ (152,100.00)$ CODE COMPLIANCE (607,000.00) $ (607,000.00) $ (1,030,000.00)$ (1,637,000.00) $ BUILDING (3,012,000.00) $ (3,012,000.00) $ (960,000.00) $ (3,972,000.00)$ BUSINESS LICENSE (712,000.00) $ (712,000.00) $ - $ (712,000.00)$ PLANNING (252,500.00) $ (252,500.00) $ - $ (252,500.00)$ ENGINEERING (16,055,036.00) $ (16,304,636.00) $ (194,100.00) $ (16,498,736.00)$ FIRE (1,100,667.00) $ (1,100,667.00) $ - $ (1,100,667.00)$ POLICE DEPARTMENT (257,519.46) $ (257,519.46) $ - $ (257,519.46)$ PUBLIC WORKS (66,488,213.00) $ (66,519,842.00) $ (504,253.00) $ (67,024,095.00)$ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (2,247,464.47)$ (2,019,337.13) $ - $ (2,019,337.13)$ MUNICIPAL UTILITIES (19,708,499.00)$ (19,708,499.00) $ - $ (19,708,499.00)$ SUBTOTAL (220,371,747.76) $ (220,522,190.05) $ (19,547,742.00) $ (240,069,932.05)$ AIRPORT OPERATIONS (32,491,896.38)$ (46,348,278.38) $ (645,229.00) $ (46,993,507.38)$ WATER (53,590,735.00) $ (53,590,735.00) $ (4,733,500.00) $ (58,324,235.00)$ SUCCESSOR AGENCY RDA (75,000.00)$ (75,000.00) $ - $ (75,000.00)$ TOTAL REVENUES (306,529,379.14) $ (320,536,203.43) $ (24,926,471.00) $ (345,462,674.43)$ DEPARTMENT/DIVISION FY21/22 BUDGET
FY21/22 REVISED
BUDGET

PROJECTED

INCREASE /
(DECREASE)

MID YEAR

PROPOSED
BUDGET
GENERAL ACCOUNTS - $ - $ - $ - $ CITY MANAGER 1,189,730.67 $ 1,189,730.67 $ 7,500.00 $ 1,197,230.67$ CITY ATTORNEY 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ - $ 400,000.00$ CITY CLERK 627,617.70 $ 827,617.70 $ - $ 827,617.70$ CITY COUNCIL 272,412.78 $ 272,412.78 $ - $ 272,412.78$ RISK MANAGEMENT 2,174,550.53 $ 2,174,550.53 $ - $ 2,174,550.53$ FINANCE 2,890,399.45 $ 2,892,899.45 $ - $ 2,892,899.45$ CUSTOMER SERVICE 3,129,420.53 $ 3,129,420.53 $ - $ 3,129,420.53$ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 4,881,817.95$ 5,133,990.87 $ 298,963.36 $ 5,432,954.23 $ HUMAN RESOURCES 1,074,855.47 $ 1,074,855.47 $ - $ 1,074,855.47$ FACILITIES 2,948,651.51 $ 3,132,669.70 $ 40,440.00 $ 3,173,109.70$ LIBRARY 1,156,149.90 $ 1,156,149.90 $ (227,730.53) $ 928,419.37 $ PARKS 5,404,643.62 $ 5,404,643.62 $ - $ 5,404,643.62$ RECREATION 1,915,038.95 $ 1,915,038.95 $ (222,310.46) $ 1,692,728.49 $ SOLID WASTE 19,782,750.73 $ 19,832,750.73 $ 1,078,000.00 $ 20,910,750.73 $ WATER CONSERVATION 516,613.35$ 516,613.35 $ - $ 516,613.35$ ANIMAL CONTROL 1,309,345.00 $ 1,309,345.00 $ - $ 1,309,345.00$ CODE COMPLIANCE 1,149,628.00 $ 1,149,628.00 $ (226,234.00) $ 923,394.00 $ BUILDING 1,617,421.00 $ 1,632,421.00 $ 8,195.00 $ 1,640,616.00$ BUSINESS LICENSE 254,279.00 $ 254,279.00 $ - $ 254,279.00$ PLANNING 1,391,178.00 $ 1,391,178.00 $ 32,126.40 $ 1,423,304.40$ SEWER DEVELOPMENT 113,242.00 $ 113,242.00 $ - $ 113,242.00$ ENGINEERING 16,397,532.15 $ 32,598,873.70 $ - $ 32,598,873.70$ WATER ENGINEERING 10,791,841.31$ 14,368,300.47 $ - $ 14,368,300.47$ SEWER ENGINEERING 2,590,001.94$ 6,096,893.11 $ - $ 6,096,893.11$ FIRE 18,895,783.76 $ 19,083,740.67 $ - $ 19,083,740.67$ FY 2021-22 CITY OF VICTORVILLE BUDGET REVENUES MID-YEAR FY 2021-22 CITY OF VICTORVILLE BUDGET EXPENDITURES MID-YEAR AIRPORT MID‐YEAR BUDGET DETAIL
EMERGENCY SERVICES 407,698.72$ 407,698.72 $ - $ 407,698.72$ POLICE DEPARTMENT 33,229,862.86$ 33,232,170.21 $ - $ 33,232,170.21$ PUBLIC WORKS 47,913,831.99 $ 49,014,054.40 $ 1,322,027.00 $ 50,336,081.40 $ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2,752,349.88$ 3,285,554.22 $ 50,000.00 $ 3,335,554.22$ MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 18,818,224.23$ 22,956,662.74 $ - $ 22,956,662.74$ SUBTOTAL 205,996,872.98 $ 235,947,385.49 $ 2,160,976.77 $ 238,108,362.26$ AIRPORT OPERATIONS 31,239,946.88$ 32,014,251.53 $ 330,200.00 $ 32,344,451.53$ WATER 37,241,281.36 $ 48,503,753.05 $ 11,447,300.00 $ 59,951,053.05 $ SUCCESSOR AGENCY RDA 3,760,504.25$ 3,760,504.25 $ - $ 3,760,504.25$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 278,238,605.47$ 320,225,894.32 $ 13,938,476.77 $ 334,164,371.09 $ FY21/22 BUDGET
FY21/22 REVISED
BUDGET

MID-YEAR

PROPOSED
CHANGE

PROPOSED

ENDING BUDGET
TOTAL REVENUES (306,529,379.14)$ (320,536,203.43) $ (24,926,471.00) $ (345,462,674.43)$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 278,238,605.47$ 320,225,894.32 $ 13,938,476.77 $ 334,164,371.09 $

ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION NO. 22-018

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE AMENDING RESOLUTION 21-064, AS AMENDED, THE BUDGET
RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021- 2022; RELATING TO AN APPROPRIATIONS OF FUNDS.

WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Victorville did heretofore submit to the City Council at mid-year additional estimates of expenditures and revenues of the City departments and offices for the fiscal year 2021-2022; and
WHEREAS, copies of said mid-year budget adjustments at the City of Victorville were prepared and distributed to the City Council, and have been available for the inspection by the public in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Victorville; and WHEREAS, the City Council did fix March 1, 2022, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 14343 Civic Drive, Vic torville, California, as the time and place for holding a Public Hearing upon said budget amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold such Public Hearing at said place upon said budget and all persons desiring to be heard by the City Council at said Public Hearing on the budget amendment were heard and the City Council, after due consideration, has determined that said budget amendment should be approved.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the increased estimates for expenditures for the City at mid-year for the fiscal year 2021-2022 now in the hands of the City Clerk is hereby adopted in the amount $2,160,976.77; and the additional estimates for revenues for the City is $19,547,742.

SECTION 2. That copies of such annual budget amendments, certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and c ertified copies t hereof shall be made available for us e by City departments and offices of the City and its subsidiary districts.

ATTACHMENT C
RESOLUTION NO. VWD-22-001

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT AMENDING RESOLUTION VWD-21-012, AS AMENDED,

THE BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR TH E VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022; RELATING TO AN APPROPRIATIONS OF FUNDS.

WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Vic torville Water District did heretofore submit to the Board of Directors of the Victor ville Water District at mid-year additional estimates of expenditures and revenues of the Victorville Water District for the fiscal year 2021-2022; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Direc tors of the Victorville Water District did fix March 1, 2022, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, California, as the time and place for holding a Public Hearing upon said budget amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District did hold such Public Hearing at said place upon said budget and all persons desiring to be heard by the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District at said Public Hearing on the budget amendment were heard and the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District, after due consideration, has determined that said budget amendment should be approved.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the increased estimates for expenditures for the Victorville Water District at mid-year for the fiscal year 2021-2022 now in the hands of the City Clerk is hereby adopted in the amount $11,447,300; and the additional estimates for revenues for the Victorville Water District is $4,733,500.

SECTION 2. That copies of such annual budget amendments, certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and certified copies ther eof shall be made available for use by the Victorville Water District, City departments, and the offices of the City.

ATTACHMENT D
RESOLUTION NO. SCLAA-22-004

A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY AMENDING RESOLUTION SCLAA-21-005, AS AMENDED,

THE BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022;
RELATING TO AN APPROPRIATIONS OF FUNDS.

WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Southern California Logistics A irport Authority did heretofore submit to the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority at mid-year additional estimates of expenditures and revenues of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority for the fiscal year 2021-2022; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority did fix March 1, 2022, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall
, 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, California, as the time and place for holding a Public Hearing upon said budget amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Author
ity did hold such Public Hearing at said place upon said budget and all persons desiring to be heard by the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority at said Pu
blic Hearing on the budget amendment were heard and the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority, after due consideration, has determined that said budget amendment should be approved.

N

OW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA A
IRPORT AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the addition
al estimates for expenditures for the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority at mid-year for the fiscal year 2021-2022 now in the hands of the City Clerk is hereby adopted in the amount $330,200; and the additional estimates for revenues for the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority is $645,229.

SECTION 2. That co
pies of such annual budget amendments, certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and certified copies ther eof shall be made available for use by the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority, City departments, and the offices of the City.

Item Number: 3
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Brenda Hampton, Director of Electric Utility Services

Subject:

VMUS Operating Result Report for FY 2022 - Quarter 2
Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council review and file this report.

Fiscal Impact:

There are no fiscal impacts associated with this report.

Discussion:

Victorville Municipal Utility Services (VMUS) operates an electric and gas utility for the City of Victorville serving select industrial and commercial customers. As part of our ongoing effort to provide transparency to Council, this VMUS Operating Results Report summarizes key financial and performance metrics in fiscal year 2022 Quarter 2.

Staff remains available for any questions you may have.

Attachments: A. Quarter 2 FY 2022 Operating Results Report

Attachment A
Quarter 2 FY 2022 Operating Results Report

VICTORVILLE

MUNICIPAL

UTILITY

SERVICES
(VMUS) October –December 2021 Fiscal Year 2022, Quarter 2 Operating Results Q2

Inside this issue:

Highlights 1
Electric Operating
Results
1 Capacity
Summary
2 Gas Operating
Results
2 Electric and Gas
Operating Results
Summary
2 VMUS projects 2

Quarter 2, FY 2022, VMUS Electric sold 25,817 MWh for $3.6 million.

Compared to Quarter 2, FY 2021, VMUS Electric sold 25,872 MWh for $3.7 million.

Electric

PROJECTS IN
PROGRESS:

• SCLA CAPACITY AND

DISTRIBUTION

UPGRADES

• TWO LARGER SIZE

ELECTRIC AND

NATURAL GAS

SERVICE

CONNECTIONS (LOT
19 AND LOT 44 AT
SCLA)

• ONE MEDIUM SIZE

ELECTRIC SERVICE

CONNECTION (LOT
43A AT SCLA)

UPCOMING PROJECTS:

• ONE MEDIUM SIZE

ELECTRIC SERVICE

CONNECTION (LOT
43B SCLA)

SCLA Electric Capacity Results
Gas
Electric

October 2021 - VMUS sold 9,279 MWh to 36 cus-
tomers and 81 connections for $1,253,528. Compared
to October 2020 (prior year): (i) sales decreased 4.0%; (ii) revenues decreased 23.7%; (iii) average system rate decreased 20.5%; (iv) cost of wholesale power de-
creased 8.2%;; and (v) the gross margin decreased by
34%.

November 2021 - VMUS sold 8,366 MWh to 36
customers and 81 connections for $1,165,239. Com-
pared to November 2020 (prior year): (i) sales in-
creased 2.3%; (ii) revenues increased 13.5%; (iii) aver- age system rate increased 10.9% (iv) cost of wholesale
power increased 11.7%; and (v) the gross margin in-
creased by 15.5%.

December 2021 - VMUS sold 8,172 MWh to 35
customers and 81 connections for $1,144,444. Com-
pared to December 2020 (prior year): (i) sales in-
creased 1.8%; (ii) revenues increased 14.2%; (iii) aver- age system rate increased 12.2%; (iv) cost of wholesale power increased 29%; and (v) the gross margin de-
creased by 3%.

Quarter 2, FY 2022

VMUS Gas sold 690,451
Therms for $859,230
Compared to Quarter 2, FY
2021 VMUS Gas sold 754,047
Therms for $795,163
Representing an 8% decrease
in Therms sold.

Electric and Gas Operating Results Summary
Gas

October 2021 - VMUS sold 193,941 Therms to 24
customers and 55 connections for $233,930. Com-
pared to October 2020 (prior year): (i) sales decreased

15.9%; (ii) revenues decreased 5.3%; (iii) cost of com- modity/transportation increased 43.2%; and (iv) the
gross margin decreased 35.2%.

November 2021 - VMUS sold 223,022 Therms to 24
customers and 55 connections for $278,035. Com-
pared to November 2020 (prior year): (i) sales de-
creased 6.4%; (ii) revenues increased 16.0%; (iii) cost of commodity/transportation increased 22.1%; and (iv) the
gross margin increased 5.8%.

December 2021 - VMUS sold 273,488 Therms to 25
customers and 56 connections for $347,265. Com-
pared to December 2020 (prior year): (i) sales de-
creased 4.1%; (ii) revenues increased 12.6%; (iii) cost of commodity/transportation increased 23.0%; and (iv) the
gross margin decreased 2.0%.

Quarter 2, FY 2022

VMUS SCLA
maximum system
capacity is 17.34 MW.

Compared to Q2 2021
peak at 15.08 MW, Q2
2022 peak
decreased to 14.76
MW.

VMUS Foxborough
Maximum Capacity is

5.6 MW. Compared to
Q2 2021 peak at 4.5
MW, Q2 2022 peak
increased to 4.6 MW.

Item Number: 4
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water

Subject:

Victorville Water District Operating Results Report for Quarter One (Q1) and Quarter Two (Q2) of Fiscal Year 2022.

Recommendation:

That the Honorable Victorville Water District Board of Directors (Board) review and file.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

Discussion:

The Victorville Water District (District) serves residential, commercial, and industrial customers, with just over 37,200 water connections. District staff will be providing the Board with a Quarterly Operating Results Report as a means to present the Board with key financial information, pertinent highlights, and operational performance indicators.

Staff remains available for any questions the Board may have.

Attachments: A. Victorville Water District Q1 FY 2022 Operating Results Report B. Victorville Water District Q2 FY 2022 Operating Results Report Attachment A
Victorville Water District
FY2022 Q1 Operating Results
Report
WATER
BUZZ

Jul. — Sep. 2021
FY 2022
Q1
The District is Awarded a Grant from
Mojave Water Agency!
The Victorville Water District was awarded an $8,000 grant to help purchase a portable drinking water station to serve our resi- dents during planned and emergency area outages, as well as City events.

The portable water tank made its first appearance at the Con- certs in the Park, a City held event in September. The water tank provided fresh drinking water to our residents while they enjoyed a great night out. Keep an eye out for the potable water tank! Water News
You Can Use
 Temporary suspension of
shutoffs from non-payment
have been extended until
12/31/21.
 The Winter watering schedule
for sprinkler irrigation is now
in effect. October– May.

Hours are 9:00am – 3:00pm.
 California Governor declares
drought emergency across
California. For additional in-
formation, please visit:
https://drought.ca.gov
 VWD continues to be in Stage
2 drought restrictions. The
drought stages are detailed
in the Water Shortage Contin-
gency Plan.
www.victorvilleca.gov/waterinfo
Highlights From this Quarter
The District In Numbers
Water Production vs. Water Purchased
Revenues from Potable and Recycled Water
Our Staff
PG
1 2
3 3
3 IN THIS ISSUE...

A QUARTERLY UPDATE FROM THE

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THIS QUARTER

Jul.— Sep. 2021
WATER
BUZZ

FY 2022
Q1

A QUARTERLY UPDATE FROM THE

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT

Active Groundwater Wells
Leaks Repaired
53 Water District
95 2,807 Service
Orders Completed

61.4%
Residential Water Use
Booster Stations
34 4
26 180
New Water
Connections
37,201
Number of Water
Connections
March 22, 2022

Active Water Tanks

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT BY THE NUMBERS
Employees

67 Toilets Provided

FY 2021
Revenues for Q1 of FY 2022 were $9,272,713 vs. $8,278,131 during the same time last year. This represents an increase of 12%.

The District produced a total of 2,391 MG of water in Q1 FY 2022 vs. 2,448 MG during the same time last year. This represents a decrease of 2.4%. Water production refers to the under-ground water pumped from wells and water deliveries from Mojave Water Agency’s Regional Recharge and Recovery (R3) water system.

Victorville
Water
District
Est.

08.15.2007
OUR STAFF:

Keith C. Metzler,
General Manager
Jenele Davidson,
Deputy City
Manager
Doug Mathews,
Director of Public
Works & Water
Arnold Villarreal,
Water Supply
Manager
Sam Arvizu,
Water Distribution
Manager
Carmen Cun,
Sr. Administrative
Analyst
Maria Villagomez,
Administrative
Secretary

Attachment B
Victorville Water District
FY2022 Q2 Operating Results
Report

WATER
BUZZ

Oct. — Dec. 2021
FY 2022
Q2
Water News
You Can Use
 Temporary suspension of
shutoffs from non-payment
ended 12/31/21.

 VWD continues to be in Stage
2 drought restrictions. The
drought stages are detailed
in the Water Shortage Contin-
gency Plan.
www.victorvilleca.gov/waterinfo

 Our Water Conservation staff
is assisting rate payers with
finding sources of water
waste in their home by com-
pleting a Water Audit.

Highlights From this Quarter
The District In Numbers
Water Production vs. Water Purchased
Revenues from Potable and Recycled Water
Our Staff
PG
1 2
3 3
3 IN THIS ISSUE...

A QUARTERLY UPDATE FROM THE

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THIS QUARTER

Utility Bill Assistance Program
ARPA Funds Helped Alleviate Customers’
Utility Bill Arrearages

On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American R e s c u e P l a n A c t ( A R P A ) o f 2 0 2 1 , a $ 1 . 9 t r i l l i o n e c o n o m i c s t i m u l u s bill. This bill guaranteed direct relief to mitigate the negative econom- ic impacts resulting from the CO VID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic created both a public health crisis and a financial crisis in the United States. Due to the pandemic, many families lost their source of income, which resulted in people falling behind on their utility bills. The City of Victorville received $33.5 million of the $1.9 trillion earmark.

On July 20, 2021, the Victorville Boar d of Directors voted to allocate $2 million in the ARPA Funding to la unch its Utility Bill Assistance Program. This program assisted customers who were behind on their City of Victorville utility bill paym ents due to COVID-19 hardships. Eli- gible customers who were in arrears on their water, sanitation, storm drain and/or household hazard wa ste payments could apply to re- ceive a one-time payment to zero out their balance owed between April 2020 and July 2021. Applicatio ns were accepted through Au- gust 23, 2021 or until funds were exhausted.

The City of Victorville received 1,986 applications which equated to 8,275 utility bills that were paid. Of the applications received, $626,762.79 was applied to outsta nding water service and con- sumption charges and $678,264.59 was applied to sanitation, storm drain and/or household hazard waste, totaling $1,305,027.38 in ARPA funds being utilized to help City of Victorville customers.

Oct.— Dec. 2021
WATER
BUZZ

FY 2022
Q2

A QUARTERLY UPDATE FROM THE

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT

Leaks Repaired
774.75 Miles of
94 2,428 Service
Orders Completed

63.9%
Residential Water Use

144
188
New Water
Connections
37,427
Number of Water
Connections
March 22, 2022

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT BY THE NUMBERS
Water Main Pipes

65 Toilets Provided

Conservation Water Audits
Completed
Conservation Toilet Program
FY 2021
Revenues for Q2 of FY 2022 were $7,944,548 vs. $7,586,131 during the same time last year.

This represents an increase of 4.7%.

The District produced a total of 1.58 MG of water in Q2 FY 2022 vs. 1.69 MG during the same time last year. This represents a decrease of 6.6%. Water production refers to the underground water pumped from wells and water deliveries from Mojave Water Agency’s Regional Recharge and Recovery (R
3) water system.

OUR STAFF:

Keith C. Metzler,
General Manager

Jenele Davidson,
Deputy City
Manager

Doug Mathews,
Director of Public
Works & Water

Arnold Villarreal,
Water Supply
Manager

Sam Arvizu,
Water Distribution
Manager

Carmen Cun,
Sr. Administrative
Analyst

Maria Villagomez,
Administrative
Secretary
Victorville
Water
District

Est.

08.15.2007

Item Number: 5
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Brian Gengler, City Engineer

Subject:

Securities Substitution for Tract Map No. 16463
Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Accept new securities for the public improvements for Tract Map No. 16463; and (2) Release the current Lien Agreement with D.R. Horton for Tract Map No. 16463.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

Background:

Tract Map No. 16463 (hereinafter called Tract No. 16463) is an 81-lot, single family subdivision, located just north of Tract 13816. In 2007, Mojave/Cobalt LLC, as the developer for Tract Nos. 13816 and 16463, recorded the maps after entering into separate Subdivision Improvement Agreements (hereinafter referred as SIA) and posting joint securities for the required public improvements. Mojave/Cobalt LLC did not complete any of the required public improvements and no homes were constructed within the tracts.

Currently, all 81 lots of the tract are undeveloped, and D.R. Horton is currently developing Tract No. 13816. The tracts are located at the northwest corner of Mojave Dr. and Cobalt Rd. Please refer to Attachment A, a vicinity map.

Discussion:

D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc., a California Corporation, also known as D.R. Horton, is the current owner of Tract 16463. On April 8, 2021, City Council approved a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with D.R. Horton for the tract development.

The SIA was secured with a Lien Agreement until the developer would be ready to start developing the tract in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code §17.64.060. D.R.

Horton is now ready to start developing this tract and therefore they must replace the Lien Agreement with traditional securities, which will be improvement bonds. The new 2 4
5 8
securities for Tract 16463 are required for public improvements including the following:
water, sewer, drainage, and street improvements for the tract interior, and the perimeter street improvements on Diamond Road, Tawney Ridge Road, and Cobalt Road.

Staff recommends that the City Council accept new securities for the remaining public improvements for Tract Map No. 16463 and release the current Lien Agreement with D.R.

Horton for Tract Map No. 16463.

Staff remains available for any questions that the City Council may have.

Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. New Securities for Tract Map No. 16463
C. Existing Lien Agreement for Tract Map No. 16463
D. Lien Agreement Release for Tract Map No. 16463

Attachment A

Vicinity Map

Attachment B

New Securities for Tract Map No. 16463

Attachment C

Existing Lien Agreement

Attachment D

Lien Agreement Release for Tract Map No. 16463
Recording Requested by:

The City of Victorville

When Recorded Please Return To:

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
SECT 11, T5N, R5W

APNs 0455-862-01 thru 05; 0455-852-01-76
No Documentary Transfe r Tax is due on the document
pursuant to Revenue Taxation Code Section 11922

SATISFACTION AND RELEASE OF LIEN AGREEMENT
TRACT 16463

WHEREAS, the City of Victor ville, hereinafter called “CITY” entered into a Lien Agreement with D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc., a California C orporation, hereinafter called “DEVELOPER”, for the substitution of existing security of Tract Map No. 16463; and

WHEREAS, said Lien Agreement imposed duties, obligations, and requirements on the City and DEVELOPER; and

WHEREAS, such performance, obligations, and requirements were recorded on February 24, 2022 as Document No. 2022-0072926 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino; and

WHEREAS, the properties listed herein were included inadvertently as part of the properties of the Lien Agreement and are in full compliance with said Lien Agreement in terms of performances, obligations, and requirements;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these properties having a lien against them inadvertently and in compliance with said agreement he reinabove stated, the CITY hereby releases the properties from any further duty, obligation, or requirement imposed pursuant to the above indicated document only, and the same is hereby deemed of no further form and effect and shall cease to exist as a lien, duty obligation, or cloud on the title to the following described real properties:

SEE EXHIBIT“A

I hereby st ate that all performances, obligations, and requirements required by the Lien Agreement, herein identified, per Title 17 of the Victorville M unicipal Code required for Tract Map No. 16463 have been complied with, or otherwise provide for, on the hereinabove described property.

_________________________
Brian Gengler, City Engineer

CITY OF VICTORVILLE

By:_____________________________
Debra Jones, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________________
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________________________
City Attorney

RISK MANAGEMENT:

_________________________________
Risk Manager

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

All that real property situated in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California described as follows:

Lot A and Lots 1 through 81 of Tract Map No. 16463, in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 326 of Tr act Maps at Pages 24 through 31 and recorded as Document Number 2007-0107860, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.

Assessor’s Parcel Nos.
0455-862-01 thru 05; 0455-852-01-76

Item Number: 6
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Brian Gengler, City Engineer

Subject:

Security Reduction for Tract Map No. 15295
Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve a reduction of 80% of the Faithful Performance Bond for the Water and Sewer Improvements for Tract Map No. 15295;
(2) Accept the water and sewer systems for maintenance; and (3) Approve a reduction of 60% of the Faithful Performance Bond for the Street Improvements for Tract Map No. 15295.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

Background:

Tract Map No. 15295 (hereinafter called Tract 15295) is an 82-lot, single family subdivision, located west of Highway 395 and north of Eucalyptus Street. In 2006, Savannah Collection – Victorville, LLC, (hereinafter referred as Savannah Collection) as the developer for Tract 15295, recorded the map after entering into a Subdivision Agreement and posting securities for the required public improvements. Savannah Homes constructed most of the public improvements. However, construction stopped when the Great Recession affected the residential market. No homes were constructed within the tract and the lots were vacant until D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc., a California Corporation, (hereinafter called D.R. Horton), began developing the tract in April of 2021.

Discussion:

At this time, D.R. Horton has completed and passed all inspections on the required water and sewer systems and both systems are fully operational. Therefore, it is recommended that 80% of the Faithful Performance securities be released at this time and that the work 2 4
6 1
be accepted in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code (VMC) Section 17.64.070(1).

The remaining 20% of the Faithful Performance Bond will be held for the one-year warranty period in accordance with VMC Section 17.64.070(4).

Staff also recommends a reduction of 60% for the Street Improvements securities as most of the improvements have been completed. The additional 40% will be released once the street improvements have been fully completed and the City is ready to accept the work for maintenance.

Staff remains available for any questions that the City Council may have.

Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table

Attachment A

Vicinity Map

Attachment B

Securities Table & Existing Securities

Securities Table
Public Improvement Faithful Performance Securities Breakdown Improvement Water Drainage Sewer Streets LMAD Monumentation Security
Amount $255,152.70 $3,619.55 $71,824.50 $1,504,188.84 $563,051.94 $5,368.00 Amount of
Security being

REDUCED
$204,122.16
(80%) $0.00 $57,459.60
(80%)
$902,513.30
(60%) $0.00 $0.00
Amount of
Security
REMAINING:
$51,030.54 $3,619.55 $14,364.90 $601,675.54 $563,051.94 $5,368.00 Developer:

D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc.
2280 Wardlow Circle, Suite 100
Corona, CA 9288.

Faithful Performance Security
Public Improvements – No. SUR0067931
Labor & Materials Security
Public Improvements – No. SUR0067931
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $2,403,205.53 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,198,918.77 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $2,403,205.53 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $1,198,918.77 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $1,164,095.06 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $1,239,110.47 Amount of Security REMAINING: $1,198,918.77

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
(To Be Used With Subdivision Improvement Agreement or Construction/Excavation Penn it) Tract Map No.: Verbena Tract 15295
Case No.: U7PJVYZJ-- OOOU ';)
Bond No.: SUR0067931
Premium: $7210.00
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and n R Harton I as Angeles Holding Campany, lac __ (hereinafter "Principal") have entered into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said Agreement, dated _ Cd ad L l Q , 20 1--I , and identified as Tract Map No. 15295 and Case No. eQrnA}2)-DOO\eJor Water, Drainage, Sewer, Streets. LMAD, Monumentation __________ lmprovement(s), is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, said Principal is required under the terms of said Agreement to furnish a bond for faithful performance of said Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, we, the Principal and Argonaut Insurance Company __ , a corporation of the State of Illinois , doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California and duly licensed to conduct a general surety business in the State of California, as surety, (hereinafter "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto the City of Victorville, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), in the penal sum of Two Million Four Hundred Three Thousand Two Hundred Five and 53/100 dollars, ($ 2,403,205 53 ), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions in the said Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

As part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.

CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/Projects/SuretyRecovery/Forms/FPBond.Blank.030520

Item Number: 7
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager

Subject:

Calendar Year 2021 Economic Development/Southern California Logistics Airport Activity Report
Recommendation:

This report is informational only. No action is requested.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact.

Background:

The City’s Economic Development Department has traditionally focused on attracting industrial development, large manufacturing, and distribution centers to the City of Victorville, as well as promoting retail development projects throughout the City. In addition to attracting industrial development and new retail development, over the past several years, Economic Development’s marketing program has focused its efforts more directly on the City’s largest reuse project, the Southern California Logistics Airport.

Discussion:

Staff has compiled the information below which highlights the activities of the Economic Development Department and the Southern California Logistics Airport (SCLA) for the 2021 calendar year. Typically, staff prepares this update summarizing overall business attraction, marketing events attended, contacts made, as well as any leads and tours conducted. However, because of the pandemic, nationally held tradeshows as well as local events were cancelled, and priorities shifted to assisting with pandemic-related activities, some of which are also detailed below.

COVID-19 Business Resources and Support Webpages:

Staff continues to assist in the maintenance and updating of multiple webpages found on the City’s website which focus on providing resources and recovery information to local 2 4
6 5
business owners and operators. The Business Assistance page identifies financial relief options, awareness and strategic programs, as well as webinars focused on how to continue business operations while also maintaining safety protocols for employees and customers in order to reduce the spread of COVID-19. These resources are continually being updated and are listed on national, state, and local outlets to address and alleviate the burden of COVID-19 and the impact it has had on local business operations.

The Business Recovery and Reopening page primarily focuses on reopening procedures, COVID-19 precautions, and business plans needed by the various business industries to ensure a successful and safe business operations environment.

Reopening Victorville Small Business Assistance Grant Program:

As an entitlement city for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, in March 2020, the city received over $800K from the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Of these funds, $445,791 was allocated to the Reopening Victorville Small Business Assistance Grant Program (the Program). The Program was created to minimize and avoid job loss caused by business closures by providing short-term working capital assistance to small businesses and to enable retention of jobs held by low and moderate- income persons. It was a one-time grant program, where eligible businesses received up to $15,000, as a reimbursement of costs, to retain jobs, continue quality services, spur economic growth in the community, and provide services such as medical, food delivery, cleaning, and other services to support the stay-at-home order, and prevent the spread of COVID-19. Two application periods were held in both 2020 and 2021. Although 200 applications were received, only 29 businesses met the eligibility requirements. Eligibility for the CDBG loans consisted of the following: (1) being located in a CDBG Target Area; (2) employing no more than 20 full-time employees; (3) operational for at least one (1) year prior to application; (4) demonstrating loss of income due to COVID-19; and (5) qualifying as a micro-enterprise, or where the business retains permanent jobs where at least 51% (computed on a full-time equivalent basis) of the employment is for low to moderate-income persons. As of December 31, 2021, the city processed reimbursements to 29 local businesses totaling $405,074.90. These reimbursements helped local businesses retain approximately 62 jobs.

Commercial/ Retail/ Industrial Development:
• Economic Development received 46 leads and held 10 virtual meetings with commercial clients this past year. The meetings were held to assist in site selection, guidance, and assistance with the City’s permitting process. Economic Development also assists new businesses connect with valuable resources and incentives at the local, county, and state level including San Bernardino County’s Workforce Development to address staffing needs.
• Staff responded to 14 Requests for Information leads from the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (Go-Biz). The submissions were prepared utilizing staff collaboration with local brokers in identifying sites suitable 2 4
6 5
for businesses expanding, relocating, or locating to California. Five properties located at SCLA were included in these submittals.
• Many new businesses located to Victorville during 2021. Among the new arrivals were CarXChange (January), Quick Quack Car Wash (February), Dutch Bros Coffee (June), Jersey Mike’s Subs (June), Chick-fil-A (July), and Amazon Last Mile Distribution Facility (October).
• At an International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) convention held in December of 2021, Economic Development staff scheduled and met with eight (8) new retail businesses with the intent of building relationships and promoting retail development projects for the City of Victorville.

On-Airport Activity:
• SCLA received 437 leads, converting 29 to meetings and providing 19 tours to prospective tenants.
• New Leases include Boeing, Graphics MFG, and Overair Inc. New lease revenue for 2021 amounts to over $24,000/month.
• Lease renewals included Karem, Otto Aviation, First Class Air Support, and ComAv. Lease renewal revenue amounts to over $33,500/month. • Option to extend leases were exercised by ComAv, CAVU, Boeing, Air Methods, Exquadrum, and ComAv. Lease extensions amounted to over $213,424/month in revenue.
• Numerous Facility Use Agreements were developed at SCLA in 2021. Some of these agreements include parking arrangements for companies like Boeing and ComAv that saw an influx of aircraft receiving maintenance and being stored due to reduced travel amid COVID-19. Businesses taking advantage of these agreements included Boeing, ComAv Global Aviation Leasing, Marin Pacific, CAVU, MMIST, and Ray Joye Machine & Fabrication.

Although the onset of COVID-19 impacted traditional airport operations, revenue was still generated in the categories below during calendar year 2021:
• 14,155 Total Aircraft Operations (Aircraft flying in and out of Airport) • 9,525 Total Aircraft Overflights (Aircraft entering SCLA airspace without landing) • 462 Total Based Aircraft (Aircraft housed at SCLA)
• 1,078 Total Badges Issued ($10 per badge for $10,780) • 2,465,999 Gallons of Fuel Pumped generating $246,600 in Fuel Flowage Fees • $61,986 in Landing Fees
• $97,226 in Parking Fees
SCLA’s occupancy rate remains strong at 96%. Staff continues to market the availability of 2 buildings on LoopNet, Aviation Property Network, and the City’s website.

Off-Airport Activity (Industrial):
2 4
6 5
• The completed High Desert Solar Project is a 105-megawatt solar farm located north of SCLA. The facility has the ability to store 50-megawatts of energy. • Project Loki, a 1,080,000 square foot warehouse on the west side of SCLA started construction with an estimated completion date of May 2022. Once completed, the warehouse will serve as an Amazon Fulfillment Center and will bring an estimated 1,000 jobs to Victorville.
• Project Cliff continues construction of an 820,000 square foot warehouse on the south side of SCLA. Once completed, the warehouse is expected bring an additional 200 jobs to Victorville.
• Project Iron Mountain, a 460,000 square foot warehouse started construction on the west side of SCLA. The project is expected to bring 100 jobs to Victorville. • Project Faring Momentum is currently under construction to bring a 475,000 square foot warehouse to the west side of SCLA. This project is expected to bring 20 full time jobs to Victorville with an additional 30 jobs offered during seasonal peak times.

Staff remains available for any questions or comments.

Attachments: None
Item Number: 8
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

John Mendiola, Finance Director / City Treasurer

Subject:

Commercial Demand Schedule No. 17
Recommendation:

That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 17 in the amount of $3,526,685.31, covering Electronic Fund Transfers No. 328978 through 329195 and Warrant No. 784674 through 784830 for 02/23/2022 through 03/02/2022 and Wire Transfers dated 02/25/2022, per the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 for the period covering July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.

Fiscal Impact:

The total fiscal impact for FY21-22 in the amount of $3,526,685.31 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the total funds paid to vendors.

Background:

Pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code (2.24.080) the attached demands were presented by the departments, audited by the Finance Department and subsequent warrants/wire transfers were issued. All were found to be in conformity to City policies and procedures and funds were budgeted or available to pay said demands. List of commercial warrants and wire transfers are now being presented to Council for approval.

Attachments: A. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 17 Check Register Summary ATTACHMENT A:

Commercial Demand Schedule No. 17 Check Register Summary

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 03/02/2022 11:57 Page 1User:

Program ID:
hguzman
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
328978 02/23/2022 EFT 000104 DANTIN ENTERPRISES, INC. 23,830.00 328979 02/23/2022 EFT 019363 ALL PROPEST CONTROL SERVI 65.00 328980 02/23/2022 EFT 017657 ALL PURPOSE DOCUMENT DEST 800.00 328981 02/23/2022 EFT 002921 AMERICAN LANDSCAPE AND MA 36,592.24 328982 02/23/2022 EFT 018562 BEST POWER EQUIPMENT, LLC 88.77 328983 02/23/2022 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 47,182.13
328984 02/23/2022 EFT 015877 BOOT BARN, INC. 2,182.95
328985 02/23/2022 EFT 002720 CALIFORNIA TOOL & WELDING 23.33 328986 02/23/2022 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 1,212.30 328987 02/23/2022 EFT 016335 CHARTER COMMUNICATION HOL 15,910.91 328988 02/23/2022 EFT 027067 COMPASS PEST MANAGEMENT I 112.00 328989 02/23/2022 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 1,093.07 328990 02/23/2022 EFT 029743 COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC. 11,070.00 328991 02/23/2022 EFT 000677 CRAFCO, INC. 1,099.49
328992 02/23/2022 EFT 014883 LMG NATIONAL PUBLISHING, 2,679.52 328993 02/23/2022 EFT 000826 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION 158.78 328994 02/23/2022 EFT 015760 FASTENAL COMPANY 1,037.71
328995 02/23/2022 EFT 017560 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 33.41 328996 02/23/2022 EFT 017560 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 445.88 328997 02/23/2022 EFT 011206 FLYERS ENERGY LLC 27,712.55 328998 02/23/2022 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 383.26 328999 02/23/2022 EFT 003960 CENGAGE LEARNING, INC. 78.26 329000 02/23/2022 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 1,537.95 329001 02/23/2022 EFT 016026 GEYSER EQUIPMENT, LLC 125.69 329002 02/23/2022 EFT 019926 BERNEL INC. 744.00
329003 02/23/2022 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 263.15
329004 02/23/2022 EFT 003047 GRAVES & KING LLP 11,381.26 329005 02/23/2022 EFT 001104 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 410.87 329006 02/23/2022 EFT 018938 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 30,023.25 329007 02/23/2022 EFT 000278 HI DESERT ALARM 150.00
329008 02/23/2022 EFT 001206 HITT PLUMBING INC. 605.00
329009 02/23/2022 EFT 007512 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY 211.15 329010 02/23/2022 EFT 001282 INLAND KENWORTH, INC. 194.08 329011 02/23/2022 EFT 001059 JOE A. GONSALVES & SON 2,845.00 329012 02/23/2022 EFT 012309 KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL 730.00 329014 02/23/2022 EFT 000696 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 389.81
329015 02/23/2022 EFT 014011 MYERS AND SONS HI-WAY SAF 1,480.91 329016 02/23/2022 EFT 028462 NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICA 37,563.70 329017 02/23/2022 EFT 028213 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 143.30 329018 02/23/2022 EFT 001789 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC. 1,303.07 329019 02/23/2022 EFT 013165 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE 123.23 329020 02/23/2022 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 615.22 329021 02/23/2022 EFT 018886 R.D. OFFUTT COMPANY 115,272.57 329022 02/23/2022 EFT 024930 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DI 15.97 329023 02/23/2022 EFT 001153 DS SERVICES OF AMERICA, I 286.75 329024 02/23/2022 EFT 019701 TIME WARNER CABLE LLC 2,375.00 329025 02/23/2022 EFT 019341 MARTIN, ARMANDO JR. 2,000.00 329026 02/23/2022 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 143.04 329027 02/23/2022 EFT 008430 CALMAT COMPANY 683.38
329028 02/23/2022 EFT 002481 VICTOR VALLEY ANIMAL PROT 22,733.17 329029 02/23/2022 EFT 013434 VICTORVILLE GLASS CO., IN 151.51 329030 02/23/2022 EFT 002498 VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER 220,043.83

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 03/02/2022 11:57 Page 2User:

Program ID:
hguzman
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
329031 02/23/2022 EFT 002554 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 526.64 329032 02/23/2022 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 150,841.55
329033 02/23/2022 EFT 014212 ALDERETE, EVONIA 337.24
329034 02/23/2022 EFT 011930 ANDERSON, PAMELA K 323.78
329035 02/23/2022 EFT 019717 ARROYO, JOANN 178.80
329036 02/23/2022 EFT 022271 ASHTON, STEVE 735.31
329037 02/23/2022 EFT 004941 BATES, CAROLEE 588.16
329038 02/23/2022 EFT 003638 BECERRA, ELIZABETH 687.80
329039 02/23/2022 EFT 012054 BECKER, JOHN R 198.25
329040 02/23/2022 EFT 014654 BEVILACQUA, ANTHONY 803.01 329041 02/23/2022 EFT 011916 BIER, MICHAEL 304.78
329042 02/23/2022 EFT 018689 BORROWMAN, STEVEN H. 855.30 329043 02/23/2022 EFT 012066 BROWN, MARTY R 803.01
329044 02/23/2022 EFT 012044 BURCHAK, GLORIA J 301.26
329045 02/23/2022 EFT 011926 BUSH, YVONNE 265.55
329046 02/23/2022 EFT 012056 CALDWELL, TERRY E 183.33
329047 02/23/2022 EFT 001114 CAMELI-STEVENS, LORAINE 158.02 329048 02/23/2022 EFT 003218 CARBAJAL, STEVEN 622.39
329049 02/23/2022 EFT 025314 CASTRO, MELISSA 675.08
329050 02/23/2022 EFT 008111 COLLINS, KEVIN 386.97
329051 02/23/2022 EFT 011935 COSTELLO, JOSE 110.51
329052 02/23/2022 EFT 011934 COX, JAMES L 186.14
329053 02/23/2022 EFT 012064 COY, MICHAEL 87.85
329054 02/23/2022 EFT 012069 DEZWART, AMY LYN 301.26
329055 02/23/2022 EFT 006095 DIAZ, JANET 502.26
329056 02/23/2022 EFT 019734 DORAN, WILLIAM J. III 243.08 329058 02/23/2022 EFT 012046 FITZSIMMONS, RALPH L 50.79 329059 02/23/2022 EFT 012062 FLORES, CYNTHIA D 161.28
329060 02/23/2022 EFT 011940 GARCIA, VINCENT J 720.26
329061 02/23/2022 EFT 011909 GARLAND, SHEILA D 238.83
329062 02/23/2022 EFT 012063 HARBOUR, RAYMOND LEE 831.26 329063 02/23/2022 EFT 015665 HELDRETH, GREGORY 818.67
329064 02/23/2022 EFT 012052 HINOJOS, JANICE A 249.95
329065 02/23/2022 EFT 011677 HOLLAND, KELLEY 243.50
329066 02/23/2022 EFT 012050 JARRETT, JENNIE L 301.26
329067 02/23/2022 EFT 022215 KARRES, RONALD J. 257.09
329068 02/23/2022 EFT 012049 KUHLMANN, EULEMA 102.63
329069 02/23/2022 EFT 014183 LAURIE, BERNEE 409.97
329070 02/23/2022 EFT 012061 LAWSON, JAMES 394.99
329071 02/23/2022 EFT 012047 LEEF, DAVID 183.33
329072 02/23/2022 EFT 009048 LUDWIG, TRACY 481.68
329073 02/23/2022 EFT 019051 LUTHER, KARLA 243.50
329074 02/23/2022 EFT 012060 MADDOX, JONNIE F 337.24
329075 02/23/2022 EFT 011919 MARTINEZ, BASILIO 803.01
329076 02/23/2022 EFT 019440 MCCORMICK, DONNA 661.62
329077 02/23/2022 EFT 014184 MCGINN, JOHN 511.79
329078 02/23/2022 EFT 011918 MCGLADE, JOHN A 161.58
329079 02/23/2022 EFT 004588 MCGOWAN, CHERYL 244.37
329080 02/23/2022 EFT 003603 MCMURTRY, DANIEL 616.98
329081 02/23/2022 EFT 011913 MILLENDER, FRANCENE J 495.14 329082 02/23/2022 EFT 004745 MILLER, BRUCE 315.19
329083 02/23/2022 EFT 011917 MORSE, RENEE 323.78

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 03/02/2022 11:57 Page 3User:

Program ID:
hguzman
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
329084 02/23/2022 EFT 012070 MOSHER, ADELE 74.58
329085 02/23/2022 EFT 012426 MULLINS, DENNIS M. 225.77
329086 02/23/2022 EFT 012065 NEWELL, CAROLYN 719.18
329087 02/23/2022 EFT 003200 O'DELL, DARRELL 477.87
329088 02/23/2022 EFT 013672 OGILVIE-HARPER, MARQUITA 220.72 329089 02/23/2022 EFT 012697 OROS, DWAYNE E. 675.08
329090 02/23/2022 EFT 012057 PATTERSON, ADAIR MARIE 323.78 329091 02/23/2022 EFT 011914 PETERSON, ROGER 152.11
329092 02/23/2022 EFT 022185 PIEPER, WADE 675.08
329093 02/23/2022 EFT 020717 PRUEITT, CORINNE 661.62
329094 02/23/2022 EFT 020716 PRUEITT, DAVID 661.62
329095 02/23/2022 EFT 018894 RANDALL, DAVID L. 521.17
329096 02/23/2022 EFT 011920 RANKIN, SHARON 261.02
329097 02/23/2022 EFT 013209 RANKIN, TIMOTHY 471.39
329098 02/23/2022 EFT 014496 RODRIGUEZ, LOUIE 616.98
329099 02/23/2022 EFT 017345 RUSSO, MARILEE 365.70
329100 02/23/2022 EFT 003583 RUSSO, VINCE 519.39
329101 02/23/2022 EFT 014493 SALAS, GLENN 279.68
329102 02/23/2022 EFT 012045 SALBERG, RAYMOND A 17.58
329103 02/23/2022 EFT 011929 SALINAS SR., XAVIER S 178.26 329104 02/23/2022 EFT 017488 SCHROEDER, KAY D. 265.55
329105 02/23/2022 EFT 014082 SMITH, ARNOLD 106.57
329106 02/23/2022 EFT 011931 SONGER FAMILY SURVIVAL TR 337.24 329107 02/23/2022 EFT 024654 SPARKS, DAVID J. 655.46
329108 02/23/2022 EFT 018887 STONESIFER, ROBERT 102.63
329109 02/23/2022 EFT 021852 STONESIFER, BARRY 675.08
329110 02/23/2022 EFT 012078 THOMASSON, PHILLIP 536.32
329111 02/23/2022 EFT 014806 WASSERMAN, REBECCA A 103.92 329112 02/23/2022 EFT 019160 WEAVER, STUART 419.17
329113 02/23/2022 EFT 011915 WHITE, JAMES M 337.24
329114 02/23/2022 EFT 011924 WILSON, BOBBY G 217.49
329115 02/23/2022 EFT 012048 WILSON, HELEN E 442.45
329116 02/23/2022 EFT 012958 WOLTERS, MARCELLA 414.20
329117 02/23/2022 EFT 012059 ZIZZI, WARREN J 565.27
329118 03/02/2022 EFT 010063 10-8 RETROFIT, INC. 13,403.17 329119 03/02/2022 EFT 002201 AAAE 330.00
329120 03/02/2022 EFT 013920 ADB SAFEGATE AMERICAS LLC 8,496.86 329121 03/02/2022 EFT 010826 AIR EXPRESSWAY TOWING, IN 75.00 329122 03/02/2022 EFT 018562 BEST POWER EQUIPMENT, LLC 518.18 329123 03/02/2022 EFT 019814 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF VICT 5,363.31 329124 03/02/2022 EFT 007650 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 215.98 329125 03/02/2022 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 5,037.51
329126 03/02/2022 EFT 010680 BLUITT, NIKISHA 335.47
329127 03/02/2022 EFT 002720 CALIFORNIA TOOL & WELDING 51.66 329128 03/02/2022 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 524.48 329129 03/02/2022 EFT 017401 DENISON'S PUBLISHING, INC 595.00 329130 03/02/2022 EFT 000600 COLES BROS. 105.60
329131 03/02/2022 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 3,010.62 329132 03/02/2022 EFT 014883 LMG NATIONAL PUBLISHING, 1,788.51 329133 03/02/2022 EFT 007554 DAVIS, JOSHUA 366.62
329134 03/02/2022 EFT 000743 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1,122.81 329135 03/02/2022 EFT 012505 DESERT ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 1,960.00

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 03/02/2022 11:57 Page 4User:

Program ID:
hguzman
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
329136 03/02/2022 EFT 005295 DOKKEN ENGINEERING 4,495.00 329137 03/02/2022 EFT 019731 EL DORADO BROADCASTERS LL 500.00 329138 03/02/2022 EFT 015760 FASTENAL COMPANY 57.96
329139 03/02/2022 EFT 017560 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 99.72 329140 03/02/2022 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 97.98 329141 03/02/2022 EFT 001002 G & M AUTOMOTIVE & TOWING 1,600.00 329142 03/02/2022 EFT 003960 CENGAGE LEARNING, INC. 133.70 329143 03/02/2022 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 187.58 329144 03/02/2022 EFT 018175 GENERAL PUMP COMPANY, INC 102,412.73 329146 03/02/2022 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 1,156.70
329147 03/02/2022 EFT 006269 GREEN, DE BORTNOWSKY, LLP 80,796.70 329148 03/02/2022 EFT 017070 GROAT, DAVID 295.00
329149 03/02/2022 EFT 018938 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 906.25 329150 03/02/2022 EFT 002809 HIGH DESERT HOMELESS SERV 15,000.00 329151 03/02/2022 EFT 000278 HI DESERT ALARM 435.00
329152 03/02/2022 EFT 018574 HITACHI ENERGY USA, INC. 509,757.82 329153 03/02/2022 EFT 010777 ICONIX WATERWORKS (US) IN 7,680.48 329154 03/02/2022 EFT 007512 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY 958.12 329155 03/02/2022 EFT 018048 INDUSTRIAL CLERICAL RECRU 1,644.36 329156 03/02/2022 EFT 024922 INFOSEND, INC 2,565.78
329157 03/02/2022 EFT 004263 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 14,376.09 329158 03/02/2022 EFT 001282 INLAND KENWORTH, INC. 514.13 329159 03/02/2022 EFT 000696 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 109.58
329160 03/02/2022 EFT 017751 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATION 631.00 329161 03/02/2022 EFT 017743 PULICE, SAMUEL A. 25.16
329162 03/02/2022 EFT 001599 MOJAVE DESERT AQMD 373.93
329163 03/02/2022 EFT 022816 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATIO 120.00 329164 03/02/2022 EFT 025260 PENWORTHY COMPANY, THE 1,684.97 329165 03/02/2022 EFT 022232 PERMA-BOUND BOOKS 791.30
329166 03/02/2022 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 754.14 329167 03/02/2022 EFT 000319 R&R INDUSTRIES, INC. 752.28 329168 03/02/2022 EFT 018886 R.D. OFFUTT COMPANY 193.18 329169 03/02/2022 EFT 018666 RETROTEL, INC. 987.67
329170 03/02/2022 EFT 017604 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC 527.12 329171 03/02/2022 EFT 020884 SALAS, JEREMY 875.00
329172 03/02/2022 EFT 015670 SCORPION FIRE PROTECTION, 6,500.00 329173 03/02/2022 EFT 003965 SCOTT, KIMBERLIE 1,889.26
329174 03/02/2022 EFT 017943 SEARCY, CASSANDRA 70.00
329175 03/02/2022 EFT 016220 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY VEH 332.41 329177 03/02/2022 EFT 022430 THALES CONSULTING, INC. 5,800.00 329178 03/02/2022 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 699.02 329179 03/02/2022 EFT 017851 TRINITY EQUIPMENT, INC 99.45 329180 03/02/2022 EFT 002419 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 815.07 329181 03/02/2022 EFT 027706 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAIN 81.16 329182 03/02/2022 EFT 013356 VALLEYWIDE NEWSPAPERS LLC 1,456.00 329183 03/02/2022 EFT 015079 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3,000.95 329184 03/02/2022 EFT 013107 VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY S 9,964.73 329185 03/02/2022 EFT 008430 CALMAT COMPANY 3,373.38
329186 03/02/2022 EFT 002782 VICTOR VALLEY DOMESTIC VI 6,989.49 329187 03/02/2022 EFT 027877 VICTORVILLE SPEEDWASH, IN 625.00 329188 03/02/2022 EFT 002862 V.V. TOW, INC. 137.00
329189 03/02/2022 EFT 002498 VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER 101.57

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 03/02/2022 11:57 Page 5User:

Program ID:
hguzman
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
329190 03/02/2022 EFT 011361 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRI 1,360.77 329191 03/02/2022 EFT 002554 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 13,230.86 329192 03/02/2022 EFT 005698 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC. 17,612.00 329193 03/02/2022 EFT 023048 WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIREN 80.00 329194 03/02/2022 EFT 022033 WOODARD & CURRAN, INC. 555,538.90 329195 03/02/2022 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 3,670.45
784674 02/23/2022 PRINTED 016218 2 HOT UNIFORMS INC 130.50 784675 02/23/2022 PRINTED 999973 AGUILAR, JEANETTE 42.00 784676 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018995 AIR EXCHANGE, INC. 1,376.54 784677 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000177 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT & S 546.33 784678 02/23/2022 PRINTED 003042 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIO 238.00 784679 02/23/2022 PRINTED 017968 AVCOM SERVICES, INC. 90.00 784680 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020713 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 219.00 784681 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000290 BATTERY MART OF APPLE VAL 517.61 784682 02/23/2022 PRINTED 003434 BISSONNETTE FAMILY TRUST 45.51 784683 02/23/2022 PRINTED 019914 BOOTH, ADAM T 60.00
784684 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000380 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 987.67 784685 02/23/2022 PRINTED 999975 CASTELLANOS, SHARON 45.00 784686 02/23/2022 PRINTED 016222 CACEO 95.00
784687 02/23/2022 PRINTED 016222 CACEO 95.00
784688 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020755 MIKE CAPOSIO BUICK GMC, L 99.20 784689 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000406 CAPPO, INC. 390.00
784690 02/23/2022 PRINTED 021825 CARPET CLUB, INC. 30,658.40 784691 02/23/2022 PRINTED 001162 CAZCOM, INC. 2,083.32
784692 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020611 CHICAGO TITLE CO 210.04 784693 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020615 CHICAGO TITLE CO 131.96 784694 02/23/2022 PRINTED 015472 CINTAS CORPORATION #2 81.31 784695 02/23/2022 PRINTED 009636 CLIMATEC, LLC 770.00
784696 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020628 CORDOVA, PEDRO 19.61
784697 02/23/2022 PRINTED 014721 CORE & MAIN LP 7,825.16 784698 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018141 CR&R INCORPORATED 341.88 784699 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018933 CUMMINS, INC. 71.00
784700 02/23/2022 PRINTED 006348 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 237.60 784701 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000764 DESERT TRUCK SUPPLY 136.19 784702 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018020 DIXON PEST CONTROL, INC. 507.00 784703 02/23/2022 PRINTED 002607 FAUST MEDIA SERVICES, LLC 622.88 784704 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000917 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 87.62 784705 02/23/2022 PRINTED 013384 LASTAND, INC. 145.00
784706 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000975 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS, INC 27.25 784707 02/23/2022 PRINTED 003073 FUNG, JOHN 54.17
784708 02/23/2022 PRINTED 001063 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE 5,523.05 784709 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020022 THE GREATER HIGH DESERT C 3,500.00 784710 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020022 THE GREATER HIGH DESERT C 150.00 784711 02/23/2022 PRINTED 017053 HIGH DESERT LOCK & SAFE, 210.31 784712 02/23/2022 PRINTED 001155 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY 94.82 784713 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000833 HINDERLITER, DELLAMAS & A 600.00 784714 02/23/2022 PRINTED 016775 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROU 8,597.50 784715 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020667 CONDON, JOSEPH 1,275.00 784716 02/23/2022 PRINTED 008871 JEFF OVIEDO ASSOCIATES 1,290.00 784717 02/23/2022 PRINTED 999983 KIZEE, BARAKA 16.00
784718 02/23/2022 PRINTED 004807 KONE, INC. 700.00
784719 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 3,697.83

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 03/02/2022 11:57 Page 6User:

Program ID:
hguzman
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
784720 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 3,620.44 784721 02/23/2022 PRINTED 007233 KOVATCH MOBILE EQUIPMENT 1,362.97 784722 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020477 LIFE-ASSIST, INC. 720.94 784723 02/23/2022 PRINTED 006235 LOUIS, DANA M 36.15
784724 02/23/2022 PRINTED 004292 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE 385.05 784725 02/23/2022 PRINTED 999985 MANZO, CARLOS 65.00
784726 02/23/2022 PRINTED 999985 MENDOZA, CARLO 35.00
784727 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000361 MARK BROWN & ASSOCIATES, 125.00 784728 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020598 MDJ MANAGEMENT 45,008.22 784729 02/23/2022 PRINTED 019193 MERRELL ENGINEERING COMPA 2,330.00 784730 02/23/2022 PRINTED 001648 NAPA AUTO PARTS 2,261.27 784731 02/23/2022 PRINTED 007044 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION REN 500.00 784732 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020340 NGUYEN, LONG VAN 41.52 784733 02/23/2022 PRINTED 001711 OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA 2,505.91 784734 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020211 ORANGE COAST TITLE CO 477.57 784735 02/23/2022 PRINTED 005800 PUMP CHECK 610.00
784736 02/23/2022 PRINTED 017946 RAILWORKS TRACK SERVICE, 4,761.28 784737 02/23/2022 PRINTED 016198 RETAIL MARKETING SERVICES 1,030.00 784738 02/23/2022 PRINTED 003150 ROBERTSON'S 2,944.26
784739 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018653 ROLLING START, INC 913.26 784740 02/23/2022 PRINTED 005096 SANDY'S COMMUNICATIONS 2,278.31 784741 02/23/2022 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 29.00 784742 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018967 SESAC RIGHTS MANAGEMENT, 2,430.00 784743 02/23/2022 PRINTED 018370 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 1,498.48 784744 02/23/2022 PRINTED 016345 NNN INVESTMENTS INC. 39.75 784745 02/23/2022 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 150,546.60 784746 02/23/2022 PRINTED 017936 STAPLES INC 380.44
784747 02/23/2022 PRINTED 002269 SUNLAND FORD 1,224.56
784748 02/23/2022 PRINTED 023108 VCA MESA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,103.39 784749 02/23/2022 PRINTED 005896 VICTOR VALLEY HAND CAR WA 59.00 784750 02/23/2022 PRINTED 999995 WILSON, LAREINA 65.00
784751 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020097 WAREHOUSE-LIGHTNING.COM L 137.03 784752 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020146 YEE, MAY 24.22
784753 02/23/2022 PRINTED 016092 BRAYFIELD, ZACHARY SCOTT 10,620.00 784754 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020208 ZEPEDA, LUIS R 10.22
784755 02/23/2022 PRINTED 000226 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES, 3,475.50 784756 02/23/2022 PRINTED 013671 WEBB, WILLIAM C 326.47 784757 02/23/2022 PRINTED 009544 FALZONE, RICHARD 195.20 784758 02/23/2022 PRINTED 020905 MACHADO, TERESA 557.80 784759 03/02/2022 PRINTED 016218 2 HOT UNIFORMS INC 3,955.06 784760 03/02/2022 PRINTED 014878 ALLTECH INDUSTRIES, INC 45,893.90 784761 03/02/2022 PRINTED 024821 ALPHA OMEGA SEPTIC SERVIC 8,057.68 784762 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000174 APEX RENTAL 161.54
784763 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000191 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH 376.08 784764 03/02/2022 PRINTED 003042 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIO 809.42 784765 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000179 APPLE VALLEY FIRE PROTECT 1,200.00 784766 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000290 BATTERY MART OF APPLE VAL 6.46 784767 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019571 MJ AUTO GLASS INC. 1,192.08 784768 03/02/2022 PRINTED 012423 BLUEBEAM, INC. 3,715.00 784769 03/02/2022 PRINTED 017353 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 142.58 784770 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019946 BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEE 96,395.41 784771 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000380 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 89.47

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 03/02/2022 11:57 Page 7User:

Program ID:
hguzman
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
784772 03/02/2022 PRINTED 016222 CACEO 32.00
784773 03/02/2022 PRINTED 004554 CALIFORNIA ROUTE 66 MUSEU 31,336.00 784774 03/02/2022 PRINTED 020755 MIKE CAPOSIO BUICK GMC, L 542.99 784775 03/02/2022 PRINTED 001162 CAZCOM, INC. 380.00
784776 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000618 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 3,039.56 784777 03/02/2022 PRINTED 004751 COCKRUM, DAVE 51.07
784778 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019813 PAGE, CORNELIOUS JR. 18,166.39 784779 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000607 COMPETITIVE DOOR & FINISH 311.37 784780 03/02/2022 PRINTED 009898 CWEA 91.00
784781 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000764 DESERT TRUCK SUPPLY 250.64 784782 03/02/2022 PRINTED 018020 DIXON PEST CONTROL, INC. 560.00 784783 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000133 DEBI MCCLUSKEY COMPANIES 380.51 784784 03/02/2022 PRINTED 011613 ECORP CONSULTING, INC. 14,223.04 784785 03/02/2022 PRINTED 016744 FAMILY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 3,211.21 784786 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002607 FAUST MEDIA SERVICES, LLC 2,479.14 784787 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000975 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS, INC 124.37 784788 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019796 GLEASON, EDWARD D 219.00 784789 03/02/2022 PRINTED 001155 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY 200.42 784790 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019809 STREAMS IN THE DESERT FOU 4,387.02 784791 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019809 STREAMS IN THE DESERT FOU 5,350.65 784792 03/02/2022 PRINTED 004021 HIGH DESERT LASER GRAPHIC 957.00 784793 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019828 HIGH DESERT SECOND CHANCE 20,631.55 784794 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000240 INLAND EMPIRE UNITED WAY 10,000.00 784795 03/02/2022 PRINTED 016775 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROU 862.50 784796 03/02/2022 PRINTED 020906 LEGENDARY FIRE SYSTEMS, I 1,595.00 784797 03/02/2022 PRINTED 022774 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,379.00 784798 03/02/2022 PRINTED 017090 LONGLEE, SHAUN 107.00
784799 03/02/2022 PRINTED 017054 LOOPNET, INC. 576.00
784800 03/02/2022 PRINTED 010660 LOVELAND'S AUTOMOTIVE SER 1,729.31 784801 03/02/2022 PRINTED 001648 NAPA AUTO PARTS 1,280.25 784802 03/02/2022 PRINTED 007044 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION REN 7,274.16 784803 03/02/2022 PRINTED 021961 NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAIS 125,000.00 784804 03/02/2022 PRINTED 001711 OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA 122.45 784805 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000871 OPTIMUM PROPERTY MGMT 20.22 784806 03/02/2022 PRINTED 000871 OPTIMUM PROPERTY MGMT 118.94 784807 03/02/2022 PRINTED 010657 PACIFIC PRODUCTS & SERVIC 3,484.23 784808 03/02/2022 PRINTED 018519 PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GR 148,642.34 784809 03/02/2022 PRINTED 004064 PROVEST REALTY INC 142.60 784810 03/02/2022 PRINTED 020847 QUICK, CASSANDRA 219.00 784811 03/02/2022 PRINTED 015481 RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES O 56,250.00 784812 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 3,105.37 784813 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002071 SAN BERNARDINO CO SOLID W 261,389.99 784814 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002193 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MUNIC 130.00 784815 03/02/2022 PRINTED 018884 FIRST STREET PARENT, INC. 161.11 784816 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 6,961.10 784817 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 20,252.00 784818 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002269 SUNLAND FORD 1,010.44
784819 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002204 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 15,998.01 784820 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019494 SWINERTON BUILDER 581.30 784821 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002323 TERRYCABLE INC. 37.71
784822 03/02/2022 PRINTED 013754 TURBOSCAPE, INC. 2,850.00 784823 03/02/2022 PRINTED 002426 UPS 96.64

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 03/02/2022 11:57 Page 8User:

Program ID:
hguzman
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
784824 03/02/2022 PRINTED 999995 WATSON, JAYSON 67.50
784825 03/02/2022 PRINTED 029510 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 266.86 784826 03/02/2022 PRINTED 019829 WOMEN OF NOBLE CHARACTER 3,000.00 784827 03/02/2022 PRINTED 016092 BRAYFIELD, ZACHARY SCOTT 150.00 784828 03/02/2022 PRINTED 008527 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 427.61 784829 03/02/2022 PRINTED 001063 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 3,166.71 784830 03/02/2022 PRINTED 005015 ST. JOHN OF GOD HEALTH SE 15,363.80 371 CHECKS CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL 3,526,322.12 .00
Wires initiated through Wells Fargo Bank

DATE OF
WIRE ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT WELLS FARGO BANK CONF # 02/25/22 Vantage Transfer Agents - 401 Vantage Transfer Agents - 401 Payment $ 363.19 CHIPS:0304491/001728/001728 Total: $ 363.19
Item Number: 9
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

John Mendiola, Finance Director / City Treasurer

Subject:

Payroll Warrant List
Recommendation:

That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify the Payroll Demand Schedule No. 8A for Payroll Period January 21, 2022 through February 04, 2022, in the amount of $1,734,136.19 covering Check Nos. 32655 through Nos. 32674, including Vendor checks.

Please note employee Check No. 32659 has a live Check and an EFT Advice. Also included are Advice Nos. 285069 through 285502, per adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 period covering July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.

Fiscal Impact:

A total fiscal impact of $1,734,136.19 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the payments by check numbers.

Discussion:

I hereby certify that the claims or demands covered by the attached list of warrants have been audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and that said claims or demands are accurate and the funds are available for payment thereof.

Attachments: A. Payroll Report PPE 020422
Attachment A
Payroll Report PPE 020422
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 1 of 12 City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period Beginning: January 21, 2022 through February 04, 2022 Checks
Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
32655 3551 02/11/2022 $606.27
32656 3625 02/11/2022 $1,521.38
32657 3624 02/11/2022 $1,760.19
32658 3627 02/11/2022 $1,231.03
32659 2705 02/11/2022 $819.44
32660 3628 02/11/2022 $2,071.82
32661 3621 02/11/2022 $1,012.05
32662 3620 02/11/2022 $1,071.94
32663 3622 02/11/2022 $905.33
32664 3626 02/11/2022 $776.91
32665 2638 02/11/2022 $2,560.47
32666 74 02/11/2022 $100.00
32667 74 02/11/2022 $200.00
32668 240 02/11/2022 $5.00
32669 787 02/11/2022 $233.00
32670 1145 02/11/2022 $100.00
32671 1182 02/11/2022 $100.00
32672 13491 02/11/2022 $422.31
32673 18154 02/11/2022 $175.00
32674 20821 02/11/2022 $423.00
Checks Total 16,095.14

City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 2 of 12 Advices
Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
32659 2705 02/11/2022 $2,000.00
285069 3608 02/11/2022 $2,113.00
285070 1099 02/11/2022 $657.43
285071 3495 02/11/2022 $8,639.69
285072 3597 02/11/2022 $3,058.42
285073 3243 02/11/2022 $2,570.25
285074 2115 02/11/2022 $21,208.00
285075 3142 02/11/2022 $1,419.67
285076 2682 02/11/2022 $2,021.52
285077 3297 02/11/2022 $630.71
285078 3458 02/11/2022 $357.45
285079 3229 02/11/2022 $17,390.94
285080 3283 02/11/2022 $9,576.82
285081 1064 02/11/2022 $6,070.12
285082 2287 02/11/2022 $2,807.08
285083 3467 02/11/2022 $1,736.49
285084 1706 02/11/2022 $22,409.59
285085 2395 02/11/2022 $2,672.63
285086 2624 02/11/2022 $2,324.20
285087 3596 02/11/2022 $2,555.50
285088 3043 02/11/2022 $1,761.50
285089 3031 02/11/2022 $2,383.11
285090 1748 02/11/2022 $2,561.44
285091 2361 02/11/2022 $1,988.46
285092 3618 02/11/2022 $1,624.17
285093 3502 02/11/2022 $1,820.34
285094 3561 02/11/2022 $2,340.91
285095 1903 02/11/2022 $1,602.90
285096 3616 02/11/2022 $2,173.25
285097 3527 02/11/2022 $1,514.86
285098 2627 02/11/2022 $1,871.14
285099 2366 02/11/2022 $1,675.08
285100 2618 02/11/2022 $1,580.16
285101 2594 02/11/2022 $2,434.15
285102 2297 02/11/2022 $1,685.22
285103 3516 02/11/2022 $2,413.34
285104 2093 02/11/2022 $1,400.85
285105 1973 02/11/2022 $3,158.14
285106 2019 02/11/2022 $2,136.16
285107 3494 02/11/2022 $2,262.15
285108 3538 02/11/2022 $1,611.08
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 3 of 12 285109 2102 02/11/2022 $2,911.28
285110 2233 02/11/2022 $2,420.36
285111 2606 02/11/2022 $1,958.65
285112 3046 02/11/2022 $1,772.29
285113 1635 02/11/2022 $20,053.97
285114 3327 02/11/2022 $1,989.92
285115 3619 02/11/2022 $1,222.32
285116 3009 02/11/2022 $3,522.84
285117 2619 02/11/2022 $2,152.88
285118 2603 02/11/2022 $1,606.84
285119 2491 02/11/2022 $2,212.77
285120 2235 02/11/2022 $3,717.06
285121 2300 02/11/2022 $2,952.04
285122 2655 02/11/2022 $1,420.86
285123 2032 02/11/2022 $2,635.69
285124 2685 02/11/2022 $1,606.57
285125 3521 02/11/2022 $2,022.78
285126 3528 02/11/2022 $1,762.57
285127 3045 02/11/2022 $2,271.38
285128 3499 02/11/2022 $1,776.63
285129 3362 02/11/2022 $1,833.14
285130 2232 02/11/2022 $2,740.35
285131 1957 02/11/2022 $2,135.77
285132 3290 02/11/2022 $1,904.29
285133 3085 02/11/2022 $1,896.63
285134 3246 02/11/2022 $2,955.53
285135 2042 02/11/2022 $8,086.34
285136 3615 02/11/2022 $2,333.21
285137 2323 02/11/2022 $2,903.34
285138 1767 02/11/2022 $2,696.78
285139 2225 02/11/2022 $3,152.97
285140 3544 02/11/2022 $1,778.77
285141 3221 02/11/2022 $2,289.22
285142 1533 02/11/2022 $2,165.45
285143 3501 02/11/2022 $17,991.44
285144 2833 02/11/2022 $1,849.75
285145 1627 02/11/2022 $3,607.08
285146 2211 02/11/2022 $17,536.61
285147 3497 02/11/2022 $972.36
285148 1426 02/11/2022 $951.70
285149 3105 02/11/2022 $1,644.13
285150 2254 02/11/2022 $2,848.28
285151 3354 02/11/2022 $3,267.33
285152 3011 02/11/2022 $2,170.79
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 4 of 12 285153 3508 02/11/2022 $1,800.12
285154 3623 02/11/2022 $1,012.05
285155 3295 02/11/2022 $1,650.01
285156 3184 02/11/2022 $12,217.74
285157 3400 02/11/2022 $1,844.87
285158 3547 02/11/2022 $1,012.05
285159 2742 02/11/2022 $2,517.80
285160 3089 02/11/2022 $3,127.99
285161 2379 02/11/2022 $1,789.32
285162 3565 02/11/2022 $896.51
285163 2711 02/11/2022 $1,570.69
285164 2099 02/11/2022 $1,523.16
285165 3586 02/11/2022 $1,667.77
285166 3190 02/11/2022 $2,284.30
285167 2249 02/11/2022 $4,304.95
285168 3250 02/11/2022 $972.36
285169 3548 02/11/2022 $1,012.05
285170 3511 02/11/2022 $1,692.69
285171 3581 02/11/2022 $1,253.75
285172 3396 02/11/2022 $1,775.38
285173 3519 02/11/2022 $2,121.01
285174 3541 02/11/2022 $2,042.83
285175 2499 02/11/2022 $2,509.97
285176 3379 02/11/2022 $2,092.29
285177 2105 02/11/2022 $16,257.61
285178 2515 02/11/2022 $2,060.74
285179 2679 02/11/2022 $2,427.46
285180 3490 02/11/2022 $2,089.98
285181 3475 02/11/2022 $2,852.41
285182 3353 02/11/2022 $2,291.94
285183 3542 02/11/2022 $1,811.49
285184 1955 02/11/2022 $3,337.29
285185 3147 02/11/2022 $3,415.96
285186 1632 02/11/2022 $2,212.95
285187 3148 02/11/2022 $2,703.60
285188 3195 02/11/2022 $1,630.27
285189 3602 02/11/2022 $1,983.64
285190 1970 02/11/2022 $2,196.20
285191 1520 02/11/2022 $2,155.85
285192 2605 02/11/2022 $1,874.36
285193 3505 02/11/2022 $3,774.06
285194 2540 02/11/2022 $3,074.54
285195 3522 02/11/2022 $1,736.12
285196 2377 02/11/2022 $2,463.82
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 5 of 12 285197 1079 02/11/2022 $2,353.16
285198 3463 02/11/2022 $2,298.27
285199 2312 02/11/2022 $2,751.50
285200 3510 02/11/2022 $2,129.05
285201 1901 02/11/2022 $5,199.29
285202 3068 02/11/2022 $1,884.75
285203 3129 02/11/2022 $3,107.26
285204 1998 02/11/2022 $2,574.35
285205 2376 02/11/2022 $3,987.22
285206 2111 02/11/2022 $2,403.02
285207 3303 02/11/2022 $3,147.48
285208 3558 02/11/2022 $2,251.01
285209 1655 02/11/2022 $2,824.45
285210 3285 02/11/2022 $2,214.22
285211 1529 02/11/2022 $1,624.07
285212 3238 02/11/2022 $3,624.38
285213 3242 02/11/2022 $8,638.21
285214 3346 02/11/2022 $1,858.98
285215 1776 02/11/2022 $2,805.85
285216 3192 02/11/2022 $1,850.05
285217 2635 02/11/2022 $2,239.75
285218 2798 02/11/2022 $1,970.72
285219 2522 02/11/2022 $1,856.65
285220 3265 02/11/2022 $1,795.20
285221 1503 02/11/2022 $2,408.18
285222 1515 02/11/2022 $2,082.79
285223 2505 02/11/2022 $2,280.26
285224 3299 02/11/2022 $1,568.67
285225 3113 02/11/2022 $1,940.08
285226 1007 02/11/2022 $3,080.03
285227 2343 02/11/2022 $593.80
285228 3273 02/11/2022 $2,136.54
285229 3121 02/11/2022 $1,699.68
285230 1497 02/11/2022 $2,242.87
285231 3537 02/11/2022 $2,027.66
285232 2192 02/11/2022 $1,625.79
285233 2034 02/11/2022 $2,544.60
285234 2275 02/11/2022 $2,580.46
285235 3380 02/11/2022 $2,024.82
285236 3191 02/11/2022 $2,155.53
285237 2530 02/11/2022 $2,608.05
285238 3496 02/11/2022 $313.20
285239 3051 02/11/2022 $1,905.76
285240 1750 02/11/2022 $2,204.17
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 6 of 12 285241 2770 02/11/2022 $1,729.39
285242 2228 02/11/2022 $2,016.60
285243 3482 02/11/2022 $972.36
285244 3101 02/11/2022 $2,399.65
285245 3335 02/11/2022 $1,882.16
285246 3611 02/11/2022 $1,083.69
285247 3388 02/11/2022 $1,096.24
285248 1249 02/11/2022 $1,813.33
285249 3284 02/11/2022 $1,649.73
285250 3580 02/11/2022 $1,012.05
285251 3270 02/11/2022 $1,499.50
285252 1117 02/11/2022 $3,025.55
285253 1625 02/11/2022 $2,639.58
285254 2248 02/11/2022 $1,803.94
285255 3263 02/11/2022 $1,465.69
285256 1588 02/11/2022 $1,960.90
285257 2189 02/11/2022 $2,238.73
285258 3560 02/11/2022 $1,921.11
285259 3509 02/11/2022 $1,734.12
285260 3226 02/11/2022 $2,649.71
285261 3257 02/11/2022 $1,629.78
285262 1121 02/11/2022 $2,794.82
285263 2689 02/11/2022 $926.66
285264 3149 02/11/2022 $2,191.41
285265 2181 02/11/2022 $2,078.01
285266 1865 02/11/2022 $2,173.98
285267 3479 02/11/2022 $1,022.96
285268 3331 02/11/2022 $1,628.69
285269 1723 02/11/2022 $1,291.15
285270 3288 02/11/2022 $997.65
285271 3296 02/11/2022 $1,823.14
285272 3572 02/11/2022 $936.14
285273 2531 02/11/2022 $2,799.78
285274 1513 02/11/2022 $1,955.15
285275 2118 02/11/2022 $984.59
285276 3387 02/11/2022 $974.04
285277 3330 02/11/2022 $1,457.47
285278 2681 02/11/2022 $3,035.93
285279 2119 02/11/2022 $1,680.27
285280 1612 02/11/2022 $1,815.27
285281 1282 02/11/2022 $2,090.65
285282 3610 02/11/2022 $1,012.05
285283 3277 02/11/2022 $1,661.34
285284 3287 02/11/2022 $1,740.37
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 7 of 12 285285 3037 02/11/2022 $1,520.35
285286 1449 02/11/2022 $2,400.23
285287 3481 02/11/2022 $997.65
285288 2677 02/11/2022 $4,382.24
285289 3341 02/11/2022 $1,770.93
285290 1137 02/11/2022 $1,549.51
285291 2383 02/11/2022 $1,665.10
285292 3130 02/11/2022 $1,681.88
285293 2489 02/11/2022 $2,389.00
285294 3361 02/11/2022 $1,767.54
285295 3139 02/11/2022 $1,528.30
285296 3099 02/11/2022 $2,449.49
285297 2696 02/11/2022 $2,042.30
285298 1287 02/11/2022 $2,638.02
285299 3536 02/11/2022 $2,028.07
285300 1254 02/11/2022 $1,796.04
285301 3187 02/11/2022 $1,748.47
285302 2368 02/11/2022 $1,703.93
285303 3095 02/11/2022 $1,820.52
285304 3532 02/11/2022 $1,770.30
285305 3258 02/11/2022 $1,022.32
285306 3100 02/11/2022 $2,343.47
285307 3259 02/11/2022 $1,022.32
285308 3344 02/11/2022 $1,458.93
285309 1338 02/11/2022 $3,194.93
285310 3507 02/11/2022 $1,022.32
285311 2229 02/11/2022 $1,566.07
285312 1049 02/11/2022 $2,130.26
285313 1506 02/11/2022 $1,757.59
285314 3568 02/11/2022 $668.02
285315 1959 02/11/2022 $2,883.91
285316 3004 02/11/2022 $1,662.14
285317 1893 02/11/2022 $1,818.87
285318 1581 02/11/2022 $2,309.97
285319 3279 02/11/2022 $1,806.53
285320 2460 02/11/2022 $1,790.53
285321 3112 02/11/2022 $1,689.95
285322 2732 02/11/2022 $1,676.98
285323 3338 02/11/2022 $1,438.75
285324 2552 02/11/2022 $1,760.78
285325 2476 02/11/2022 $3,228.15
285326 2279 02/11/2022 $2,025.90
285327 3515 02/11/2022 $4,402.01
285328 3092 02/11/2022 $2,372.56
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 8 of 12 285329 3138 02/11/2022 $2,534.57
285330 3146 02/11/2022 $3,118.71
285331 2749 02/11/2022 $818.43
285332 2748 02/11/2022 $1,794.00
285333 2669 02/11/2022 $2,956.54
285334 2623 02/11/2022 $1,732.08
285335 3180 02/11/2022 $0.00
285336 2637 02/11/2022 $2,995.08
285337 3079 02/11/2022 $1,615.27
285338 3513 02/11/2022 $1,744.28
285339 3109 02/11/2022 $2,262.93
285340 2671 02/11/2022 $2,952.38
285341 3019 02/11/2022 $2,767.95
285342 2593 02/11/2022 $2,145.81
285343 3328 02/11/2022 $2,112.71
285344 3461 02/11/2022 $1,744.34
285345 2626 02/11/2022 $1,986.02
285346 3038 02/11/2022 $2,060.85
285347 3052 02/11/2022 $1,805.95
285348 2290 02/11/2022 $1,810.70
285349 3110 02/11/2022 $3,318.41
285350 2641 02/11/2022 $1,902.17
285351 2612 02/11/2022 $2,470.82
285352 2642 02/11/2022 $2,456.24
285353 2674 02/11/2022 $2,198.34
285354 3231 02/11/2022 $2,148.85
285355 3228 02/11/2022 $2,217.17
285356 2628 02/11/2022 $2,509.52
285357 3301 02/11/2022 $1,487.77
285358 2630 02/11/2022 $3,423.62
285359 2643 02/11/2022 $1,813.09
285360 3182 02/11/2022 $2,239.78
285361 2599 02/11/2022 $2,038.59
285362 2683 02/11/2022 $2,353.42
285363 2753 02/11/2022 $2,051.83
285364 2610 02/11/2022 $2,293.53
285365 3323 02/11/2022 $1,707.98
285366 1389 02/11/2022 $2,472.61
285367 3264 02/11/2022 $1,852.85
285368 2808 02/11/2022 $2,273.27
285369 2646 02/11/2022 $2,347.45
285370 3617 02/11/2022 $2,071.35
285371 2600 02/11/2022 $3,096.74
285372 2524 02/11/2022 $2,254.24
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 9 of 12 285373 2686 02/11/2022 $1,843.21
285374 2193 02/11/2022 $2,150.27
285375 3322 02/11/2022 $2,710.70
285376 3230 02/11/2022 $2,773.08
285377 1931 02/11/2022 $1,734.09
285378 2038 02/11/2022 $1,674.51
285379 2339 02/11/2022 $2,118.68
285380 2678 02/11/2022 $3,221.78
285381 3240 02/11/2022 $1,971.44
285382 3215 02/11/2022 $2,597.60
285383 3035 02/11/2022 $2,228.51
285384 3185 02/11/2022 $2,034.59
285385 1853 02/11/2022 $2,614.11
285386 3503 02/11/2022 $2,266.84
285387 3589 02/11/2022 $727.70
285388 3570 02/11/2022 $270.30
285389 3376 02/11/2022 $2,730.13
285390 3384 02/11/2022 $964.39
285391 3386 02/11/2022 $1,799.71
285392 2488 02/11/2022 $526.60
285393 3120 02/11/2022 $846.67
285394 3474 02/11/2022 $821.37
285395 3582 02/11/2022 $661.07
285396 3252 02/11/2022 $2,315.68
285397 3070 02/11/2022 $1,948.18
285398 1866 02/11/2022 $1,385.54
285399 3371 02/11/2022 $887.98
285400 3577 02/11/2022 $75.11
285401 3267 02/11/2022 $930.55
285402 2478 02/11/2022 $938.87
285403 3470 02/11/2022 $755.93
285404 3315 02/11/2022 $846.67
285405 3471 02/11/2022 $919.25
285406 3531 02/11/2022 $3,350.23
285407 3587 02/11/2022 $794.85
285408 3029 02/11/2022 $1,623.64
285409 3326 02/11/2022 $2,917.27
285410 3609 02/11/2022 $794.85
285411 3492 02/11/2022 $219.19
285412 3491 02/11/2022 $286.67
285413 3576 02/11/2022 $109.26
285414 3566 02/11/2022 $727.84
285415 3397 02/11/2022 $1,843.89
285416 2006 02/11/2022 $2,277.89
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 10 of 12 285417 2684 02/11/2022 $1,418.66
285418 1966 02/11/2022 $2,071.01
285419 2204 02/11/2022 $2,881.76
285420 2355 02/11/2022 $1,969.42
285421 3500 02/11/2022 $2,027.70
285422 3601 02/11/2022 $1,497.78
285423 2039 02/11/2022 $1,705.98
285424 3281 02/11/2022 $1,248.00
285425 1990 02/11/2022 $1,860.43
285426 3550 02/11/2022 $1,875.60
285427 2629 02/11/2022 $1,874.61
285428 3348 02/11/2022 $1,520.36
285429 1544 02/11/2022 $2,254.12
285430 3543 02/11/2022 $1,752.60
285431 3107 02/11/2022 $1,959.92
285432 3081 02/11/2022 $1,869.09
285433 3523 02/11/2022 $3,138.28
285434 3271 02/11/2022 $2,026.91
285435 3017 02/11/2022 $3,937.59
285436 3512 02/11/2022 $2,168.26
285437 2027 02/11/2022 $1,253.88
285438 2330 02/11/2022 $2,151.10
285439 1932 02/11/2022 $1,635.12
285440 2590 02/11/2022 $1,552.00
285441 3437 02/11/2022 $3,141.99
285442 3416 02/11/2022 $1,741.56
285443 3421 02/11/2022 $2,503.13
285444 3439 02/11/2022 $2,681.01
285445 3440 02/11/2022 $2,893.66
285446 3441 02/11/2022 $1,943.19
285447 3559 02/11/2022 $4,429.48
285448 3473 02/11/2022 $2,654.40
285449 3406 02/11/2022 $3,891.24
285450 3422 02/11/2022 $3,169.89
285451 3407 02/11/2022 $3,331.88
285452 3442 02/11/2022 $4,068.47
285453 3368 02/11/2022 $1,245.47
285454 3433 02/11/2022 $1,814.51
285455 3469 02/11/2022 $3,183.62
285456 3424 02/11/2022 $2,661.11
285457 3414 02/11/2022 $3,211.14
285458 3425 02/11/2022 $2,097.50
285459 3443 02/11/2022 $2,350.61
285460 3600 02/11/2022 $3,092.94
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 11 of 12 285461 3598 02/11/2022 $3,230.17
285462 3418 02/11/2022 $1,729.77
285463 3444 02/11/2022 $2,429.10
285464 3583 02/11/2022 $2,391.65
285465 3585 02/11/2022 $2,983.14
285466 1718 02/11/2022 $2,958.14
285467 3409 02/11/2022 $2,077.67
285468 3426 02/11/2022 $3,441.82
285469 3584 02/11/2022 $2,304.34
285470 3410 02/11/2022 $4,171.98
285471 3447 02/11/2022 $2,971.96
285472 3427 02/11/2022 $2,940.49
285473 3607 02/11/2022 $2,876.28
285474 3411 02/11/2022 $3,449.52
285475 3448 02/11/2022 $1,890.53
285476 3571 02/11/2022 $2,175.99
285477 3518 02/11/2022 $1,797.63
285478 3449 02/11/2022 $2,901.94
285479 3428 02/11/2022 $3,007.54
285480 3429 02/11/2022 $2,631.08
285481 3455 02/11/2022 $2,620.58
285482 3451 02/11/2022 $2,365.84
285483 3595 02/11/2022 $2,794.00
285484 3430 02/11/2022 $3,329.15
285485 3452 02/11/2022 $2,310.08
285486 3417 02/11/2022 $2,355.86
285487 3431 02/11/2022 $1,675.46
285488 3419 02/11/2022 $2,565.61
285489 3524 02/11/2022 $2,197.63
285490 3412 02/11/2022 $4,899.12
285491 3564 02/11/2022 $2,234.10
285492 3420 02/11/2022 $3,738.73
285493 3378 02/11/2022 $3,749.54
285494 3435 02/11/2022 $1,990.96
285495 3432 02/11/2022 $2,242.45
285496 3408 02/11/2022 $4,162.40
285497 3445 02/11/2022 $2,166.08
285498 3456 02/11/2022 $1,747.23
285499 3591 02/11/2022 $1,601.61
285500 3392 02/11/2022 $3,194.37
285501 2210 02/11/2022 $2,457.69
285502 3434 02/11/2022 $3,118.49
Advices Total 1,077,200.75
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 02/24/2022Page 12 of 12 Electronic Vendor Payments
Vendor Total Gross
IRS 232,820.42
State Taxes 62,936.67
CASDU 4,213.40
Deferred Comp (457) 86,443.34
Deferred Comp (401a) 821.36
PERS 250,785.11
VV Professional Firefighters 1/27/2022 2,820.00
Total Electronic Payments 640,840.30
Item Number: 10
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk

Subject:

Minutes of the December 16, 2021 Special City Council Meeting, December 21, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting, and December 22, 2021 Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting
Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on December 16, 2021, the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on December 21, 2021, and the minutes of the Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting held on December 22, 2021.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.

Attachments: A. Minutes of the December 16, 2021 Special City Council Meeting B. Minutes of the December 21, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting C. Minutes of the December 22, 2021 Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting
Attachment A
Minutes of the December 16, 2021
Special City Council Meeting

City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov

VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL

VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS RAIL AUTHORITY

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR

JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT

Special Meeting Minutes
Thursday, December 16, 2021
6:00 p.m. Special Session

6:00 p.m. Special Session

Call to Order

Roll Call

Present: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

Absent: None

Also Present:

City Manager Keith C. Metzler, Deputy City Manager Sophie Smith, Deputy City Manager Jenele Davidson, City Clerk
Jennifer Thompson, City Attorney Andre de Bortnowsky

Invocation: Mayor Debra Jones

Pledge of Allegiance: Lieutenant Jacob Gault

City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda

Agenda presented with no revisions reported.

Conflict of Interest Declarations

There were no conflicts of interest reported.

Introduction to Public Comments

Mayor Jones provided an opening statement regarding public comments.

Public Comments

The following people spoke regarding the Public Hearing item:

Yvonne Mashack spoke in opposition.

Anthony Hernandez spoke in support.

Enrique Barrios spoke in support.

Angel Esparza spoke in support.

Rafael Porras spoke in support.

Ryan McEachron spoke in support.

Chef Basil Kimbrew spoke in support.

Blanca Gomez spoke in support.

Liz Becerra spoke in support.

Scott Rafferty spoke in support.

Maggie Martin spoke in opposition.

Roger LaPlante spoke in support.

Guest spoke in opposition.

PUBLIC HEARING(S)

1. Introduction of Ordinance No. 2422, Establishing District-Based City Council Elections and approving the District Boundary Map and Sequencing of Elections

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable City Council:
(1) Receive a presentation from City staff and Redistricting Partners; (2) Open the public hearing;
(3) Receive input from the public regarding draft district boundary maps, the proposed sequencing of elections of Councilmembers, and proposed Ordinance No 2422 to establish district-based elections, adopt the final map and the election sequencing; (4) Close the public hearing; and
(5) Introduce Ordinance No. 2422 for adoption and first reading by title only; and (6) Waive further reading in full of proposed Ordinance No. 2422. The Ordinance will be brought back to the City Council for second reading an d final adoption at a public hearing on December 21, 2021.

Chris Chaffee from Redistricting Partners provided a presentation regarding the process and overview of the City’s final maps.

Questions ensued

Mayor Jones opened the Public Hearing.

The following people spoke:

Yvonne Mashack spoke on item 1.

Chef Basil Kimbrew spoke on item 1.

Guest spoke on item 1.

Blanca Gomez spoke on item 1.

Scott Rafferty spoke on item 1.

Roger LaPlante spoke on item 1.

Mayor Jones closed the Public Hearing.

Motion was made to approve points 5 and 6 on the agenda.

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Irving

Comments ensued

Motion passed 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

Adjournment

Mayor Jones adjourned the meeting at 7:15 p.m.

ATTEST:

_________________________ __________________________ Debra Jones, Mayor Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk

Attachment B
Minutes of the December 21, 2021
Regular City Council Meeting

City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov

VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL

VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS RAIL AUTHORITY

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR

JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT

Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, December 21, 2021
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session

5:00 p.m. Closed Session

Call to Order

Roll Call

Present: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

Absent: None

Introduction to Public Comments

Mayor Jones provided an opening statement regarding public comments.

Public Comments for Closed Session Items

The following people spoke:

Blanca Gomez spoke on Closed Session Item A.

Declaration of Closed Session Item(s) by City Attorney

City Attorney Andre de Bortnowsky announced one (1) closed session item as set forth on the agenda.

CITY COUNCIL

A. Conference With Legal Counsel Regarding Anticipated Litigation Pursuant To Government Code Section 54956.9
Based on advice of legal counsel and existing facts and circumstances, a point has been reached in the opinion of the City Council that the City is facing significant exposure to litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d )(2)). Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(e)(3), the existing facts and circumstances relate to letters received from Scott J. Rafferty, Esq., between August 12, 2021 and September 27, 2021 alleging violations of the California Voting Rights Act. Such letters are available for review in the City Clerk's office pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5. Number of Potential Cases: One (1).

Recess to Closed Session

6:00 p.m. Regular Session

Call to Order

Roll Call

Present: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

Absent: None

Also Present:

City Manager Keith C. Metzler, Deputy City Manager Sophie Smith, Deputy City Manager Jenele Davidson, City Attorney, Andre de Bortnowsky, Deputy City Clerk Savanna Petty

Closed Session Announcements by the City Attorney

City Attorney Andre de Bortnowsky announced one (1) closed session item as set forth on the agenda. There were no reportable actions with respect to this item.

Invocation: Father Pat Travers of Supply Priest of the High Desert

Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain John Wickum

Proclamations/Special Presentations

Certificate of Recognition in remembrance of Rowena Green and in honor of her service to our community as a 50 year resident of the City of Victorville and a para- educator for 25 years.

Certificate of Recognition in remembrance of Ammie Hunter and in honor of her service to our community as a trustee with the Adelanto Elementary School District Board; founder of the nonprofit, Another Level for Women; and member of several local nonprofits.

City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda

Deputy City Clerk announced two (2) re visions. Item 24 had a revision to the recommendation section; Item 25 had a revision to the recommendation section as well as to the last paragraph of the discussion section.

Conflict of Interest Declarations

There are no conflicts of interest reported.

Introduction to Public Comments

Mayor Jones provides an opening statement regarding public comments.

Public Comments

The following people spoke:

Gurdeep Singh spoke on general items.

Blanca Gomez spoke on general items.

Kareema Abdul spoke on agenda item 2 and general items.

Chupi Brandon spoke on general items.

Roger LaPlante spoke on general items.

Maggie Martin spoke on general items.

PUBLIC HEARING(S)

1. An Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan with an environmental finding of previously assessed to allow for studio efficiency residential units at a minimum size of 320 square feet on property larger than 15,000 net square feet generally located north of Moj ave Drive, south and east of Interstate I -15 and west of Stoddard Wells Road

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and take the following actions:
(1) Find the Specific Plan Amendment Previo usly Assessed under the 2018 Old Town Specific Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
(2) Introduce Ordinance No. 2423 for Adoption and First Reading by Title Only to Adopt an Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan; and
(3) Waive a Further Reading in Full of Proposed Ordinance No. 2423.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendations

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Councilmember Gomez

Motion 4-0

Aye: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

2. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2422, Establishing District -Based City Council Elections and approving the District Boundary Map and Sequencing of Elections

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable City Council:
(1) Receive a report from City Staff;
(2) Open the public hearing;
(3) Receive input from the public regarding proposed Ordinance No. 2422 establishing district-based elections for City Councilmembers, and approving the selected fin al map and sequence of elections attached to and set forth in said Ordinance;
(4) Leave the public hearing open;
(5) Continue said hearing to an adjourned regular City Council meeting to be held at 9 a.m. on Wednesday, December 22, 2021, at which time fina l adoption and second reading of Ordinance No. 242 2 can occur to ensure compliance with Government Code Section 36934. At said adjourned regular meeting, Your Honorable City Council will receive any remaining public comments; close the public hearing; adopt for final passage and second reading by title only Ordinance No. 2422, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

VICTORVILLE ESTABLISHING DISTRICT -BASED ELECTIONS FOR CITY COUNCILMEMBERS BY AMENDING TITLE 2 OF THE VICTORVILLE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 2.15 “CITY COUNCIL - DISTRICT-BASED ELECTIONS” AND APPROVING THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP AND SEQUENCE OF ELECTIONS FOR CITY COUNCILMEMBERS”; and (6) Waive further reading in full of proposed Ordinance No. 2422.

Questions ensued

The Chair opened the Public Hearing.

The following people spoke:

Scott Rafferty spoke on item 2.

Roger LaPlante spoke on item 2.

Maggie Martin spoke on item 2.

Linda spoke on item 2.

Motion was made to adopt points 5 and 6 to continue the items to an adjourned meeting on December 22 at 9 am.

Moved: Mayor Pro Tem Irving
Seconded: Councilmember Becerra

Comments ensued

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

CONSENT CALENDAR

3. Payroll Warrant List

Recommendation:

That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify the Payroll Demand Schedule No. 5A for Payroll Period October 29, 2021 through November 12, 2021, in the amount of $1,594,038.67 covering Check Nos. 32561 through Nos. 32573, including Vendor checks. Please note employee Check No. 32563 has a live Check and an EFT Advice. Also included are Advice Nos. 282444 through 282884, per adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2021 -2022 period covering July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.

4. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 11

Recommendation:

That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 11 in the amount of $22,905,125.09, covering Electronic Fund Transfers No. 327906 through 328101 and Warrant No. 783703 through 783839 for 11/17/2021 through 11/23/2021 and Wire Transfers dated 11/19/2021 through 11/23/2021, per the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 for the period covering July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.

5. Center for the Arts Fire Restoration Project, Notice of Completion

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council accept as complete and approve the Notice of Completion (NOC) for the Center for the Arts Fire Restoration Project.

6. Reject all bids and resolicit Licensed Radios for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System

Recommendation:

That the Honorable Victorville Water District Board of Directors:
(1) Reject all bids received and opened for the Licensed Radios for SCADA System, Project #CC22-040 ("Project"); and
(2) Direct staff to resolicit the Project.

7. Securities Substitution for Tract Map No. 17599

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with LGI Homes – California, LLC;
(2) Accept new securities for the remaining public improvements; (3) Release the existing Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Standard Pacific Corporation; and
(4) Release the existing Lien Agreement with Joshua Tree Fund 22, LLC.

8. Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance for Residential Compliance Program (RCP) Case No. 19- 04-24 (14101 Apple Creek Dr., Victorville, CA 92395); as well as acceptance and reallocation of associated Program Income funds

Recommendation:

That City Council take the following actions regarding RCP Case No. 19-04-24:
(1) Approve the Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance; (2) Authorize the execution of the Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance by the Deputy City Manager;
(3) Accept the payoff of the loan receivable to the Residential Rehabilitation Program Income Account; and
(4) Adopt Resolution No. 21-109 amending the annual budget for fiscal year 2021- 2022 reallocating the subject $13,066.62 of Residential Compliance Program funds to the Residential Rehabilitation Program.

9. Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance for MAP Case No. 08-08-07 - Stickley

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable City Council:
(1) approve the Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance for MAP Case No. 08-08-07
(2) authorize the execution thereof by the Deputy City Manager, (3) accept the payoff of the loan receivable and
(4) adopt Resolution No. 21-
106, amending the annual budget for Fiscal Year
2021-2022.

10. Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance for MAP Case No. 01-10-12 - Orta

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable City Council approve the recording of a Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance regarding MAP Case No. 01-10-12 (Orta).

11. Adoption of Resolution No. 21 -112 Approving Fiscal Year 2021 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP)

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable City Council adopt Resolution No. 21 -112 approving the Fiscal Year 2021 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP).

12. Minutes of the October 26, 2021 Special City Council Meeting, November 2, 2021 and November 16, 2021 Regular City Council Meetings

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on October 26, 2021, and the minutes of the Regular City Council Meetings held on November 2, 2021 and November 16, 2021.

Questions and comments ensued.

Motion was made to approve staff recommendations

Moved: Mayor Pro Tem Irving
Seconded: Councilmember Becerra

Motion 4-0 with Councilmember Gomez voting no on item 6

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

13. General Services Provider Standard Agreement with Odyssey Power for stationary equipment maintenance and repair of generators

Recommendation:

That the Honorable Victorville Water District Board of Directors (Board) approve Amendment No. 4 to the General Services Provider Agreement by and between Victorville Water District (District) and Odyssey Power for stationary equipment maintenance and repair of generators, Project ESC 19- 006, for an additional amount of $8,237.00.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendation

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Irving

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

14. Request to Purchase One (1) Pierce Arrow Chassis 107’ Tractor Drawn Ladder Aerial Truck

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve the purchase of one (1) Pierce Arrow Chassis 107’ Tractor Drawn Aerial Ladder Truck (also known as a Tiller) from South Coast Fire Equipment through the Houston -Galveston Area Council Buy (HGACBuy) Cooperative Purchase Program Contract FS 12-19; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all purchasing documentation.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendations

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Councilmember Gomez

Comments ensued

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

15. Acceptance of a $95,000 grant from Kaiser Foundation Hospitals to assist with operational expenses at the City’s Interim Shelter

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Accept the grant award from Kaiser Foundation Hospitals in the amount of $95,000 to help offset operational expenses at the City’s Interim Shelter; (2) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to facil itate receipt and utilization of grant funds; and
(3) Adopt Resolution No. 21- 114, amending the annual budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 to reflect an additional appropriation of revenues and expenditures in the amount of $95,000.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendations

Moved: Mayor Pro Tem Irving
Seconded: Councilmember Becerra

Comments ensued

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

16. Acceptance of $199,000 in Emergency Solutions Grant -Coronavirus (ESG -CV) grant funding to assist with operational expenses at the City’s Interim Shelter

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council adopt Resolution No. 21-115 to:
(1) Accept the Emergency Solutions Grant - Coronavirus (ESG-CV) grant funding in the amount of $199,000 to assist with operational expenses at the City’s Interim Shelter;
(2) Authorize the City Manager or his designe e as the Signature Authority to execute all grant documents necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project; and
(3) Amend the annual budget for Fiscal Year 2021-
2022 to reflect an additional
appropriation of revenues and expenditures in the amount of $199,000.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendations

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Irving

Comments ensued

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

17. Approval of Agreement with Merrell Johnson Geotechnical, Inc., for Material Testing for the Seventh Avenue and Arrowhead Drive Road Improvement Project

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council approve a Consultant / Professional Services Provider Agreement with Merrell Johnson Geotechnical, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00, for material testing for the Seventh Avenue and Arrowhead Drive Road Improvement Project.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendations

Moved: Mayor Pro Tem Irving
Seconded: Councilmember Becerra

Comments ensued

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

18. Approval of Agreement with ECORP Consulting, Inc., for a Preconstruction Biological Survey for the Seventh Avenue and Arrowhead Drive Road Improvement Project

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council approve a Consultant / Professional Services Provider Agreement with ECORP Consulting, Inc., in an amount not to exceed of $10,000.00, for a nesting bird preconstruction survey for the Seventh Avenue and Arrowhead Drive Road Improvement Project.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendation

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Irving

Comments ensued

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

19. Southern California Edison Easements along Amethyst Road for Tract 20274

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the Honorable City Council grant utility easements to Southern California Edison adjacent to Amethyst Road, in Tract 20274, on Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN) 3072-361-48, 3072-371-67 and 3072-371-68 as described in the attached documents.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendation

Moved: Councilmember Gomez
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Irving

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

20. Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Valued Housing Il, LLC

Recommendation:

That the Board of Directors for the City as Housing Assets Successor (CHAS):
(1) Approve an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (“ENA”) with Valued Housing II, LLC, to negotiate the potential development and construction of an affordable housing development on four (4) City as Housing Assets Successor properties in the City’s Old Town area.
(2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the ENA

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendations

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Councilmember Gomez

Comments ensued

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

The Chair called a recess at 8:21 p.m.

Recess concluded at 8:31 p.m.

21. Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Housing 4 US All, LLC

Recommendation:

That the Board of Directors for the City as Housing Assets Successor (CHAS):
(1) Approve an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (“ENA”) with Housing 4 US All, LLC, to negotiate the potential development and construction of an affordable housing development on seven (7) City as Housing Assets Successor properties in the City’s Old Town area.
(2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the ENA

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendations

Moved: Councilmember Gomez
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Irving

Comments ensued

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

22. Possible cancellation of a Regular City Council Meeting

Recommendation:

Any action is at the discretion of the City Council.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to Cancel the first meeting in January 2022.

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Councilmember Gomez

Motion 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

23. Appointment of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable City Council:
(1) Direct the City Clerk to open nominations for the office of Mayor, take nominations, announce the outcome of the vote and declare the appointment upon a majority vote of the Council;
(2) The newly appoi nted Mayor shall preside over the process for the office of Mayor Pro Tem, unless he/she prefers the City Clerk to facilitate the appointment; and
(3) Open nominations for the office of Mayor Pro Tem, take nominations, and have the City Clerk announce the outcome of the vote and declare the appointment upon a majority vote of the Council.

Deputy City Clerk opens nominations for the office of Mayor.

Mayor Jones and Councilmember Gomez were nominated.

Deputy City Clerk closed the nomination period.

A vote was taken in which Councilmember Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, and Mayor Jones voted in favor of declaring Mayor Jones to hold the office of Mayor, with Councilmember Gomez voting for herself.

Mayor Jones opened the nomination period for the office of Mayor Pro Tem.

Mayor Pro Tem Irving and Councilmember Becerra were nominated.

Mayor Jones closed the nomination period.

A vote was taken in which Councilmember Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, and Mayor Jones voted in favor of declaring Mayor Pro Tem Irving to hold the office of Mayor Pro Tem, with Councilmember Gomez abstaining.

24. City Council appointments to outside agencies

Recommendation:

That the City Council consider and appoint members to fill the vacant committee positions indicated in Attachment A.

Mayor Jones opened the nominations for the vacant primary seat for Victor Valley Economic Development Authority (VVEDA)

Councilmember Becerra and Councilmember Gomez were nominated.

Mayor Jones closed the nomination period.

A vote was taken in which Councilmember Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, and Mayor Jones voted in favor of declaring Councilmember Becerra to hold the primary seat for VVEDA, with Councilmember Gomez voting for herself.

Mayor Jones opened the nominations for the vacant alternate seat for VVEDA.

Mayor Pro Tem Irving and Councilmember Gomez were nominated.

Mayor Jones closed the nomination period.

A vote was taken in which Councilmember Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, and Mayor Jones voted in favor of declaring Mayor Pro Tem Irving to hold the alternate seat for VVEDA, with Councilmember Gomez voting for herself.

Mayor Jones opened the nomination period for the vacant alternate seat for CONFIRE.

Mayor Jones and Councilmember Gomez were nominated.

Mayor Jones closed the nomination period.

A vote was taken in which Councilmember Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, and Mayor Jones voted in favor of declaring Mayor Jones to hold the alternate seat for CONFIRE, with Councilmember Gomez voting for herself.

Mayor Jones opened the nomination period for the vacant alternate seat for Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District Board (MDAQMD)

Mayor Jones and Councilmember Gomez were nominated.

Mayor Jones closed the nomination period.

A vote was taken in which Councilmember Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, and Mayor Jones voted in favor of declaring Mayor Jones to hold the alternate seat for MDAQMD, with Councilmember Gomez voting for herself.

25. Appointments to City's Committees

Recommendation:

That the City Council:
(1) Re-affirm the appointees to the City’s Committees as the term of office is coterminous with the term of office of the nominating Councilmember (Local Appointments list); and
(2) Terminate the Legislative Review Committee.

Questions ensued

Motion was made to approve staff recommendation

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Irving

Motion 3-1

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones Noes: Councilmember Gomez

26. City Manager Reports

The Home Key Grant has awarded the City 28 million dollars to build the wellness center campus downtown.

The City received 3.3 million dollars from the Prop 68 States Parks Program Gran t,
which will be directed to Eva Del Park.

Victorville Disposal will be collecting Christmas trees from January 3 rd through the
14th during normal service days, after that, arrangements can be made for bulky item pick up. Trees can also be taken to the Anacapa Road facility, at the recycling drop off center.

An industrial project at Foxborough Industrial Park, on the north side of Nisqualli,
is in the plan check phase for a 200,000 square foot expansion of the existing location. A pr oject on Mojave Drive, on the northwest corner of El Evado and Mojave, is an AutoZone in the second plan check submittal phase.

27. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Upcoming Agenda Items

Motion was made for discussion and possible action during the January 18, 2022 regular City Council meeting to allocate funds that would allow all council persons the opportunity to attend professional development hosted by the League of California Cities in the year 2022.

Moved: Mayor Pro Tem Irving

Seconded: Councilmember Becerra

Motion passes 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

28. Reports from Councilmembers

Councilmember Becerra presented her reports, thanking all city employees for a job well done this year, and wishing all a Merry Christmas and Happy New year

Councilmember Gomez presented her reports, speaking on how she is very involved in the community . Also, how int eresting it’s been going to court . She thinks every Councilmember is a good resource, and that they can contribute a lot to the members in the community.

Mayor Pro Tem Irving presented her reports, congratulating Mayor Jones on keeping the office of Mayor in the City of Victorville. Also, wanted to thank staff for the wonderful job they’ve done. She is proud of the City of Victorville and her colleagues. She is very optimistic about the next year and she’s sure they will do a fine job. She wished everyone a Merry and a prosperous year.

Mayor Jones presented her reports, speaking of being thankful to her colleagues for putting her back in the office of Mayor . She’s proud of her colleagues and thanked the City Manager, Keith Metzler, for doing a superb job on driving forward the Council’s mission, vision, and goals . She wished a m erry Christmas to everyone in the community.

Adjournment

Mayor Jones adjourned the meeting at 9:18 p.m. until tomorrow the 22nd at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall to further take up item number 2.

ATTEST:

_________________________ __________________________ Debra Jones, Mayor Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk

Attachment C
Minutes of the December 22, 2021
Adjourned Regular City Council
Meeting

City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov

VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL

VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS RAIL AUTHORITY

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR

JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT

Adjourned Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, December 22, 2021
9:00 a.m. Adjourned Regular Session

9:00 a.m. Adjourned Regular Session

Call to Order

Roll Call

Present: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

Absent: None

Also Present:

City Manager Keith C. Metzler, Deputy City Manager Sophie Smith, Deputy City Manager Jenele Davidson, City Attorney Andre de Bortnowsky, City Clerk Jennifer Thompson

Invocation: Mayor Jones

Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain John Wickum

City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda

Agenda presented with no revisions reported.

Conflict of Interest Declarations

There were no conflicts of interest reported.

Introduction to Public Comments

Mayor Jones provided an opening statement regarding public comments.

Public Comments

The following people spoke:

Lizet Angulo spoke on general items.

Chef Basil Kimbrew spoke on general items.

Blanca Gomez spoke on general items.

Maggie Martin spoke on general items.

PUBLIC HEARING(S)

1. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2422, Establishing District -Based City Council Elections and approving the District Boundary Map and Sequencing of Elections

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable City Council:
(1) Receive a report from City Staff;
(2) Open the public hearing;
(3) Receive input from the public regarding proposed Ordinance No. 2422 establishing district-based elections for City Councilmembers, and approving the selected final map and sequence of elections attached to and set forth in said Ordinance;
(4) Leave the public hearing open;
(5) Continue said hearing to an adjourned regular City Council meeting to be held at 9 a.m. on Wednesday, December 22, 2021, at which time final adoption and second reading of Ordinance No. 242 2 can occur to ensure compliance with Government Code Section 36934. At said adjourned regular meeting, Your Honorable City Council will receive any remaining public comments; close the public hearing; adopt for final passage and second reading by title only Ordinance No. 2422, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

VICTORVILLE ESTABLISHING DISTRICT -BASED E LECTIONS FOR CITY COUNCILMEMBERS BY AMENDING TITLE 2 OF THE VICTORVILLE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 2.15 “CITY COUNCIL - DISTRICT-BASED ELECTIONS” AND APPROVING THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP AND SEQUENCE OF ELECTIONS FOR CITY COUNCILMEMBERS”; and (6) Waive further reading in full of proposed Ordinance No. 2422.

Comments ensued

Mayor Jones opened the Public Hearing.

The following people spoke:

Scott Rafferty spoke in support.

Maggie Martin spoke in support.

Mayor Jones closed the Public Hearing.

Motion was made to approve and take action on points 5 and 6.

Moved: Councilmember Becerra
Seconded: Councilmember Gomez

Comments ensued

Motion passed 4-0

Ayes: Councilmember Becerra, Councilmember Gomez, Mayor Pro Tem Irving, Mayor Jones

Adjournment of Meeting

Mayor Jones adjourned the meeting at 9:33 a.m.

ATTEST:

_________________________ __________________________ Debra Jones, Mayor Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk

Item Number: 11
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Josefina Trevino, Human Resources Officer

Subject:

Benefits Resolution No. 22-020 and Table Of Organization Recommendation:

That the City Council adopt Benefits Resolution 22-020, revising the Table of Organization and Compensation Schedule, effective January 1, 2022.

Fiscal Impact:

The fiscal impact associated with the employee salary schedule and benefits is included with the Mid-year 2021-2022 Budget.

Discussion:

Below is a summary of the proposed changes to the Benefits Resolution and the Table of Organization.

Changes to Personnel
A total of 7 full-time positions have been added, 4 full-time positions were deleted, and there are 2 title changes. The total authorized full-time positions increased from 459 to 462 positions, reflecting a net increase of 3 positions (Please see Attachment A, Summary of Changes to the Table of Organization).

Changes to Part-time Hourly Rates
On December 17, 2019, the City of Victorville Council approved Resolution 19-097, the Part-time Employee Table of Compensation with a three-year phased implementation plan, with 2022 being the last year, resulting from SB3 amending the minimum wage.

Unfortunately, the part-time hourly rates for several classifications, effective January 1, 2022, were missed in the 2021-2022 fiscal year benefits resolution adoption (Please see Attachment C, Part-Time Table of Compensation). The budget reflected the increases, so there is no additional impact to the budget.

2 4
5 6
Changes to Benefits
On Thursday, June 17, 2021, President Joe Biden signed the Juneteenth National Independence Day Act, (the “Juneteenth Act”) into law to recognize the end of slavery in the United States. This new law adds Juneteenth, which takes place on June 19th of every year, to the list of federally recognized holidays. Because Juneteenth falls on a Sunday this year, Monday June 20th will be observed.

Additionally, the allowable amount that can be transferred to a deferred compensation plan has been increased to $20,500 as of January 1, 2022 (Please see Attachment B, Benefits Resolution No. 22-020 and Table of Organization).

Staff is requesting your favorable consideration on this item and is available for any questions that you may have.

Attachments: A. Summary of Changes to the Table of Organization B. Benefits Resolution No. 22-020 and Table of Organization C. Part-Time Table of Compensation

ATTACHMENT A

CITY OF VICTORVILLE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO THE TABLE OF ORGANIZATION
MID YEAR 2021-2022

BUILDING DEPARTMENT
ADDED: 1
(1) SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR, RANGE 42
DELETE: 1
BUILDING MANAGER, RANGE 50

CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT
DELETE: 1
(1) MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN, RANGE 29

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ADDED: 1
(1) MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, RANGE 35
DELETED: 1
(1) ENGINEERING SPECIALIST, RANGE 38
TITLE CHANGE: 1
(1) TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SPECIALIST, RANGE 41 TO ASSISTANT ENGINEER I, RANGE 41

FIRE DEPARTMENT
ADDED: 1
(1) FIRE ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER, RANGE 50
DELETED: 1
(1) ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST, RANGE 41

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
ADDED: 2
(1) SECRETARY, RANGE 21
(1) TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN, RANGE 27

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ADDED: 1
(1) HOMELESSNESS SERVICES MANAGER, RANGE 50
TITLE CHANGE: 1
(1) ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY, RANGE 29 TO MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN RANGE 29

PUBLIC WORKS AND WATER DEPARTMENT
ADDED: 1
(1) MAINTENANCE WORKER, RANGE 18

ATTACHMENT B

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 1

RESOLUTION NO. 22-020

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE AMENDING THE TABLE OF

ORGANIZATION, FIXING THE RATES OF COMPENSATION, AND ESTABLISHING FRINGE BENEFITS FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE INCLUDED IN RESOLUTION NUMBER 2 1-052 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS.

WHEREAS, copies of said Table of Organization, Fixing Rates of Compensation, and Establishing Fringe Benefits relating to an appropriation of funds at the City of Victorville were prepared and distributed to the City Council, and have been available for the inspection by the public in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Victorville.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the Table of Organization for the fiscal year 2021-2022 is hereby revised. A total of 462 full-time Positions on such Table of Organization are authorized to be filled in accordance with the Personnel Ordinance of the City of Victorville. The salaries and compensation of officers and employees of the City of Victorville shall be established as provided in said Personnel Ordinance for the salary ranges to which position is assigned by this Benefit Resolution for Fiscal Year 2021-2022.

NO. POSITION RANGE NO. POSITION RANGE
5 ACCOUNT CLERK 20 4081 4961 27 FIREFIGHTER PARAMEDIC FFPM 5542 6805 2 ACCOUNTANT 40 6688 8129 1 FLEET ADMIN TECHNICIAN 27 4851 5897 6 ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST 41 6855 8332 1 FLEET MANAGER 50 8561 10406 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 29 5097 6195 1 GAS DISTRIBUTION COORDINATOR 39 6525 7931 1 AIRPORT DIRECTOR 64 10887 13234 1 GIS COORDINATOR 39 6525 7931 1 AIRPORT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 37 6210 7549 1 GIS MANAGER 50 8561 10406 8 AIRPORT MAINTENANCE WORKER 18 3885 4722 2 GIS TECHNICIAN 27 4851 5897 1 AIRPORT OPERATIONS & FACILITIES MANAGER 50 8561 10406 1 HOMELESSNESS SOLUTIONS COORDINATOR 42 7026 8541 4 AIRPORT OPERATIONS OFFICER 23 4395 5342 1 HOMELESSN ESS SOLUTIONS MANAGER 50 8561 10406 1 AIRPORT SPECIALIST 35 5911 7185 1 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST 41 6855 8332 1 ANIMAL CARE & CONTROL MANAGER 50 8561 10406 1 HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 64 10887 13234 1 ANIMAL CONTROL COMMUNITY OU TREACH OFFICER 35 5911 7185 1 HUMAN R ESOURCES SPECIALIST 35 5911 7185 1 ANIMAL CONTROL LEAD OFFICER 28 4973 6044 1 LEAD MECHANIC 32 5489 6672 3 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER 24 4505 5476 2 LIBRARY COORDINATOR 27 4851 5897 2 ANIMAL CONTROL TECH 27 4851 5897 2 LINE LOCATOR 25 4618 5613 1 ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER 61 10110 12289 9 MAINTENANCE LEAD WORKER 28 4973 6044 6 ASSISTANT ENGINEER I 41 6855 8332 1 MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 40 6688 8129 2 ASSISTANT ENGINEER II 45 7567 9197 41 MAINTENANCE WORKER 18 3885 4722 1 ASSISTANT PLANNER 37 6210 7549 3 MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 35 5911 7185 1 ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER 51 8775 10666 5 MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN 29 5097 6195 2 ASSOCIATE PLANNER 44 7382 8973 2 MARKETING TECHNICIAN 29 5097 6195 3 BATTALION CHIEF BC 9124 11201 2 MECHANIC 23 4395 5342 1 BATTALION CHIEF (DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL) BC 9124 11201 10 OFFICE ASSI STANT 17 3790 4607 1 BILLING TECHNICIAN 28 4973 6044 1 PARKS SUPERVISOR 40 6688 8129 1 BUILDING & FIRE OFFICIAL 64 10887 13234 3 PERMIT TECHNICIAN 27 4851 5897 3 BUILDING INSPECTOR 35 5911 7185 1 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFI CER 64 10887 13234 1 BUYER 33 5626 6839 1 PUBLIC WORKS & WATER DIRECTOR 64 10887 13234 1 CHILDREN'S LIBRARIAN 27 4851 5897 4 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 35 5911 7185 1 CITY CLERK 64 10887 13234 2 PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER 50 8561 10406 5 CITY COUNCIL MEMBER 943 2 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR 40 6688 8129 1 CITY ENGINEER 68 12018 14608 1 PUBLIC WORKS TECHNICIAN 29 5097 6195 1 CITY LIBRARIAN 40 6688 8129 1 RECREATION & LIBRARY MANAGER 50 8561 10406 1 CITY MANAGER 21507 2 RECREATION SUPERVISOR 37 6210 7549 1 CITY PLANNER 64 10887 13234 1 RECYCLING TECHNICIAN 27 4851 5897 1 CITY SURVEYOR 50 8561 10406 1 RISK MANAGER 50 8561 10406 2 CODE COMPLIANCE TECHNICIAN 27 4851 5897 1 SCADA COORDINATOR 42 7026 8541 2 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I 30 5224 6350 12 SECRETARY 21 4183 5085 8 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II 35 5911 7185 4 SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK 24 4505 5476 1 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL 64 10887 13234 1 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST 47 7950 9663 1 COMMUNITY RELATIONS SPECIALIST 35 5911 7185 1 SENIOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER 32 5489 6672 1 COMMUNITY SERVICES COORDINATOR 27 4851 5897 1 SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR 42 7026 8541 1 CROSS CONNECTION COORDINATOR 32 5489 6672 2 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER 55 9686 11773 1 CROSS CONNECTION TECHNICIAN 29 5097 6195 2 SENIOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 42 7026 8541 1 CUSTOMER SERVICE LEAD R EPRESENTATIVE 28 4973 604 4 1 SENIOR ENGINEERING & GIS TECHNICI AN 33 5626 6839 14 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE 20 4081 4961 2 SENIOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 27 4851 5897 2 DEPUTY CITY CLERK 29 5097 6195 1 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN 31 5355 6509 2 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER 75 14285 17364 2 SENIOR MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER 32 5489 6672 1 DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 35 5911 7185 19 SENIOR MAINTENANCE WORKER 22 4288 5212 1 DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN 29 5097 6195 8 SENIOR MECHANIC 29 5097 6195 1 DIRECTOR OF ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICES 64 10887 13234 2 SENIOR PLAN CHECKER 42 7026 8541 1 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 64 10887 13234 2 SENIOR PLANNER 50 8561 10406 1 DIVISION CHIEF DC 10234 12439 2 SENIOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT TECHNICIAN 33 5626 6839 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER 50 8561 10406 2 SENIOR WATER DISTRIBUTION LEAD WORKER 36 6059 7365 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN 27 4851 5897 10 SEN IOR WATER DISTRIBUTION WORKER 23 4395 5342 2 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SPECIALIST 33 5626 683 9 1 SENIOR WATER SUPPLY LEAD OPERATOR 38 6366 7737 1 ELECTRICAL TECHNICIAN 33 5626 6839 8 SENIOR WATER SUPPLY OPERATOR 29 5097 6195 1 ELECTRICAL TECHNICIAN ASSISTANT 31 5355 6509 1 SIG N TECHNICIAN 24 4505 5476 1 ELECTRICIAN 33 5626 6839 1 SURVEY TECHNICIAN 28 4973 6044 1 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDI NATOR 45 7567 9197 4 SW EEPER OPERATOR 24 4505 5476 1 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COORDINATOR EMSC 7799 9480 5 TECHNOLOGY COORDINATOR 39 6525 7931 1 ENERGY MARKET MANAGER 50 8561 10406 1 TECHNOLOGY MANAGER 50 8561 10406 2 ENGINEERING LEAD WORKER 28 4973 6044 1 TECHNOLOGY OFFICER 64 10887 13234 1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS COORDINATOR 43 7202 8754 4 TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN 27 4851 5897 1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER 50 8561 10406 1 TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 40 6688 8129 6 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 24 4505 5476 2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 28 4973 6044 1 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANA GER 40 6688 8129 1 UTILITY DISTRI BUTION SUPERVISOR 40 6688 8129 2 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER 37 6210 7549 3 VEHICLE SERVICE WORKER 18 3885 4722 1 FACILITIES MANAGER 50 8561 10406 1 WAREHOUSE CLERK 20 4081 4961 2 FINANCE ANALYST 47 7950 9663 2 WAREHOUSE TECHNICIAN 23 4395 5342 2 FINANCE MANAGER 50 8561 10406 2 WATER CONSERVATION SPECIALIST 30 5224 6350 3 FINANCE SPECIALIST 35 5911 7185 4 WATER DISTRIBUTION LEAD WORKER 28 4973 6044 3 FINANCE SUPERVISOR 40 6688 8129 2 WATER DISTRIBUTION SUPERVISOR 40 6688 8129 5 FINANCE TECHNICIAN 29 5097 6195 11 WATER DISTRIBUTION WORKER 19 3982 4840 1 FIRE ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER 50 8561 10406 2 WATER MANAGER 50 8561 10406 15 FIRE CAPTAIN FC 7339 9010 1 WATER QUALITY SPECIALIST 30 5224 6350 1 FIRE CHIEF 70 12626 15347 1 WATER RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 40 6688 8129 15 FIRE ENGINEER FE 6197 7608 2 WATER SUPPLY LEAD OPERATOR 32 5489 6672 2 FIRE INSPECTOR 30 5224 6350 1 WATER SUPPLY SUPERVISOR 42 7026 8541 462 NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED FT POSITIONS

Resolution 22-020 MID-YEAR 2021-2022 Table of Organization

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
MID-YEAR 2021-2022 TABLE OF ORGANIZATION
Revised and adopted by the City of Victorville Council as of January 1, 2022

SALARY SALARY

STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP
R a n g e 12345
17 3790 3979 4178 4387 4607
18 3885 4079 4283 4497 4722
19 3982 4181 4390 4609 4840
20 4081 4285 4500 4725 4961
21 4183 4393 4612 4843 5085
22 4288 4502 4727 4964 5212
23 4395 4615 4846 5088 5342
24 4505 4730 4967 5215 5476
25 4618 4849 5091 5346 5613
27 4851 5094 5349 5616 5897
28 4973 5221 5482 5757 6044
29 5097 5352 5619 5900 6195
30 5224 5486 5760 6048 6350
31 5355 5623 5904 6199 6509
32 5489 5763 6052 6354 6672
33 5626 5908 6203 6513 6839
35 5911 6207 6517 6843 7185
36 6059 6362 6680 7014 7365
37 6210 6521 6847 7189 7549
38 6366 6684 7018 7369 7737
39 6525 6851 7193 7553 7931
40 6688 7022 7373 7742 8129
41 6855 7198 7558 7935 8332
42 7026 7378 7747 8134 8541
43 7202 7562 7940 8337 8754
44 7382 7751 8139 8546 8973
45 7567 7945 8342 8759 9197
47 7950 8347 8765 9203 9663
50 8561 8989 9438 9910 10406
51 8775 9214 9674 10158 10666
55 9686 10170 10679 11213 11773
61 10110 10616 11146 11704 12289
64 10887 11432 12003 12604 13234
68 12018 12619 13249 13912 14608
75 14285 14999 15749 16537 17364
FF 5542 5858 6174 6489 6805
FE 6197 6550 6903 7255 7608
FC 7339 7757 8175 8592 9010
BC 9124 9643 10162 10681 11201
EMS 7799 8189 8598 9028 9480
DC 10234 10746 11283 11847 12439
Only Active Ranges shown based on the Table of Organization Resolution 22-020 Mid- Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 3 of 12

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
MID-YEAR 2021-2022 TABLE OF COMPENSATION - MONTHLY RATE OF PAY Revised and adopted by the City of Victorville Council as of January 1, 2022

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 4

SECTION 2. FRINGE BENEFITS - The following is provided as an overview and should not be considered as a complete description of benefits. The fringe benefits are for the City of Victorville full-time employees effective July 1, 2021, unless otherwise specified, through June 30, 2022, shall be:

1. Annual Vacation Leave - All full-time employees shall earn annual vacation credits accrued bi-weekly in the beginning of the years listed below and are authorized to accumulate vacation leave credits as follows:

Years of Full-
Time
Employment
Annual
Vacation
Hours
Earned
Safety Shift
Annual
Vacation Hours
Earned
Hours Earned Per
Pay Period (26 pay
periods per year)
Safety Shift Hours
Earned Per Pay
Period (26 pay
periods per year)
Maximum
Vacation
Accrual Hours
Safety Shift
Maximum Vacation
Accrual Hours
0-5 80 112 3.08 4.31 160 224
6-10 120 168 4.62 6.47 240 336
11-15 160 224 6.15 8.61 320 448
16+ 200 280 7.69 10.77 400 560

Full-time employees are eligible to use annual leave time as it accrues. Effective January 1, 2012, accruals will be earned every pay period. (See City of Victorville Personnel Rules, Rule X, Sections 1 and 2.)

2. Sick Leave – Accrued at the rate of 3. 7 hours per pay period for all probationary and full-time employees, for a total of 96 hours per year.

Safety Shift Personnel (56-hour per week) accrue at the rate of 4.69 hours per pay period for all probationary and full-time employees, for a total of 122 hours per year.

Healthy Workplaces/Healthy Families Act of 2014 Paid Sick Leave – A part-time employee who, on or after July 1, 2015, works in California for 30 or more days within a year from the beginning of employment is entitled to paid sick leave. Paid sick leave accrues at the rate of one hour per every 30 hour s worked, paid at the employees’ regular wage rate. Accrual shall begin on the first day of employment. Accruals may be capped at 48 hours or 6 days.

Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) Sick Leave Conversion:

Any COVID-19 sick leave hours provided under The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) not used by employees by December 31, 2020, have been converted to paid time off hours. The converted paid time off hours will be available from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 202 2. These hours are not subject for a payout and shall be scheduled with the employee’s supervisor or Department Head, taking into consideration the request of the employee and the work demands of the department. Approval by the Department Head prior to taking this time off is required.

Sick Leave Yearly Payoff - Non-represented full-time employees who maintain a minimum of 144 hours and have completed 5 years of full -time of continuous service with the City of Victorville will be able to receive a payoff of their accrued sick leave hours. The maximum payoff cannot exceed 1 44 hours, every December, beginning December 2021. The payoff will be based on the following scale:

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 5

Sick Leave Accrued as of Date of
Termination
Cash Payment of hours of
Accrued Sick Leave
240 hours or less 35%
241 to 320 hours 40%
321 to 400 hours 45%
401 to 480 hours 50%
481 to 560 hours 55%
561 to 640 hours 60%
641 to 720 hours 65%
721 to 800 hours 70%
801 to 880 hours 75%
881 to 960 hours 80%
961 to 1,040 hours 85%
1,041 to 1,120 hours 90%
1,121 to 1,200 hours 95%
1,201 hours and above 100%

Upon completion of five (5) years of continuous service, sick leave payout upon separation of service or termination is calculated according to the above formula, pursuant to Resolution 09-103:

3. Holidays
Day Date Holiday
Monday 5-Jul-21 Independence Day
Monday 6-Sep-21 Labor Day
Thursday 11-Nov-21 Veterans Day
Thursday 25-Nov-21 Thanksgiving Day
Friday 26-Nov-21 Day after Thanksgiving Day
Thursday 23-Dec-21 Christmas Eve Holiday
Friday 24-Dec-21 Christmas Holiday (Observed)
Thursday 30-Dec-21 New Year's Eve Holiday
Friday 31-Dec-21 New Year's Day Holiday
Monday 17-Jan-22 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
Monday 21-Feb-22 President's Day
Monday 30-May-22 Memorial Day
Monday 20-Jun-22 Juneteenth National Independence Day
1 Floating Holidays
Total of 14 Holidays

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 6

Note: Actual holidays vary each year. T hree days in December are designated as permanent Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) reduction days and applied to the December holiday schedule. Actual COLA reduction days taken are based on individual department needs and must be taken within 30 days. Days off during the December holidays shall not be prorated for any employee hired after January 1, 2022.

Floating Holiday may be taken in conjunction with another holiday, vacation, or sick leave day. No partial holiday may be taken. Floating Holiday may be taken after six months of service.

Premium Holiday Pay- Based on the approved holidays in this section and excluding the floating holiday, nonexempt, full-time, non-represented employees who are eligible for paid holidays but who are required to work on a company holiday will be paid at one and one- half times their regular rate of pay for the hours worked in addition to holiday pay. Part-time employees who are required to work on an approved company holiday will be eligible to receive one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for the hours worked.

Safety Shift Personnel (56-hour per week) will be paid ten (10) hours of regular pay for each of the above holidays on the pay period in which the holiday occurs. The floating holiday will be paid during the pay period of the employee’s choice.

4. Stability Pay – Non-represented employees will receive stability pay , starting after 10 years o f continuous part-time or full-time service or the combination of the two with the City of Victorville, every December, beginning December 2021, based on the following scale:

Years of Service Amount
10 - 14 $500
15 - 19 $1,000
20 + $1,500

5. Executive Leave – Provided to Department Heads, Assistant Department Heads, and other designated staff, based on the City Manager’s evaluation of the amount of time worked. Advance written approval by the City Manager is required. (See Administrative Policy D-1.)

6. Compensatory Time – Employees eligible for compensatory time may accrue such time, up to the limit of 40 hours for full-time employees. Compensatory time may not be earned until 40 hours have been worked in a workweek. Compensatory time earned after 40 hours in a workweek are earned at one and one-half rates.

Compensatory time must be used within six months from the date of accrual. It is the employee’s choice whether to receive compensatory time or overtime pay. Part-time employees and Safety Shift Personnel are not eligible for compensatory time.

7. Retirement – Effective July 1, 2015, the City ceased to pay the 8.0% employee share of contributions to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). The City ceased to report the Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) to PERS as special compensation. The City shall participate in the CalPERS replacement benefit plan or equivalent. The City provides all full- time employees 4th l evel 1959 Survivor’s Benefits. For full -time employees and Council Members hired on or after January 1, 2013, CalPERS

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 7

contributions will be implemented according to the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) AB 340 and AB 197. Council Members have the option to elect membership into CalPERS. • Miscellaneous Classic Formula: Member formula: 2.5% @ 55 Employees pay CalPERS 8% employee contribution.
• Miscellaneous PEPRA Formula: Member formula 2.0% @ 62 Employee will pay the statutorily mandated employee contribution rate of one half of the total normal cost. • Safety Classic Formula: Member formula: 2% @ 50 Employee pay CalPERS 9% employee contribution. • Safety PEPRA F ormula: Member formula 2.7% @ 57. Employee will pay the statutorily mandated employee contribution rate of one half of the total normal cost.

8. Deferred Compensation –As of January 1, 20 22, full-time employees shall be eligible to transfer up to $20,500 of annual salary per year into a City -approved Deferred Compensation Plan; full-time employees 50 years of age and above are allowed a catch up provision of $6,500. An additional standard provision is available to full-time employees who are planning on retiring within thre e years. Under this provision funds not utilized may be contributed the year prior to retirement. Deferred Compensation funds may be accessed through a loan program.

A 401(a) Def ined Contribution Plan is available for new full -time employees who may elect an employee contribution, under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan document allows a 60-day period for the individuals to make an election from the initial date of hire. Pursuant to Federal Regulations, effective December 31, 2009, existing full-time employees may not enroll or modify an existing 401(a) plan.

The following Victorville Fire De partment positions will receive employer contributions per month: Fire Chief $800, Division Chief $750, Battalion Chief $750, Fire Marshal $750, Fire Training Captain Officer $600, Fire Captain $600, Fire Engineer $250.

9. Retirement Medical Coverage – City employees and Council Members who meet CalPERS’s requirements and retire simultaneously with the City of Victorville are considered City retirees.

The City shall be responsible for retirees’ (beginning with eight years of service) medical insurance premium as follows:

Years of Service 25 + 20-24 15-19 8-14
City Paid 100% 75% 50% 25%

Retirees must have been previously enrolled in medical coverage, for twelve consecutive months, in the City’s medical insurance plan at time of retirement to be eligible to receive the medical reimbursement based on the above table.

For early retirees under age 65 - Payment is based on the single- party rate of the medical options available through the City’s insurance plan, not to exceed $900 per month.

For retirees age 65 and over – Payment is based on available Medicare Supplemental options single-party rate, available through the City’s insurance plan, not to exceed $900 per month.

Retirees age 65 and over must be enrolled with Medicare Part A (Hospital) and Part B (Medical) in order to be eligible for a retiree medical plan offered through the City.

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 8

Retirees may continue dental and vision insurance coverage at their own expense.

Retirees must have been previously enrolled in medical coverage, for twelve consecutive months, in the City’s medical insurance plan at time of retirement to be eligible to receive the one time pay-off option.

Effective February 11, 2000, an employee may opt for a one time pay -off, at the time of retirement, in lieu of monthly medical retirement benefits. This shall be paid on a pro- rated basis, contingent upon years of service described in the chart below.

Years of Service 25 + 20-24 15-19 8-14
City Paid 100% 75% 50% 25%
Pay-off Amount $17,091 $13,672 $10,253 $6,838

These amounts may change annually, based on the CPI applied to the City employees’ wages.

10. Medicare - Employees hired after April 1, 1986, shall contribute 1.45% of their base salary as a matching share of contribution to provide Medicare coverage, available upon retirement, based on Social Security Administration guidelines.

11. Fringe – The amount of $900 per month is provided by the City for health, dental, and vision coverage for all non-represented full-time employees and Council Members . Married couples who are both full -time employees with the City may utilize the full fringe each for family medical, dental and vision. If eligible family members are enrolled, they must be enrolled in the same coverage as elected by the employee. The maximum cash back benefit for employees and Council Members waiving medical benefits is $400 per month. Employees and Council Members may purchase dental and vision coverage with this amount. Any remaining balance may be deposited into a flexible spending account or included as taxable income on their paychecks. Flexible spending accounts are provided for pre- tax deposits to cover expens es for health care and/or dependent day care. The City is responsible for the monthly administrative fee associated with the health care and dependent day care plans.

Additionally, non-represented full-time employees who enroll in medical, dental and vision plans and are paying out-of-pocket, the City will subsidize 50% of the total out-of-pocket cost up to $500 per month. This subsidy does not apply to Council Members or retirees.

Fringe for Represented Employees - The amount of $850 per month is provided by the City for health, dental, and vision coverage for represented full-time employees. Married couples who are both full -time employees with the City may utilize the full fringe each for family medical, dental and vision. If eligible family members are enrolled, they must be enrolled in the same coverage as elected by the employee. The maximum cash back benefit for employees waiving medical benefits is $350 per month. Employees may purchase dental and vision coverage with this amount. Any remaining balance may be deposited into a flexible spending account or included as taxable income on their paychecks. Flexible spending accounts are provided for pre- tax deposits to cover expenses for health care and/or dependent day care. The City is responsible for the monthly administrative fee associated with the health care and dependent day care plans.

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 9

12. Workers' Compensation Program – Insurance provided by the City for work-related injuries occurring to the employee during the course of employment. (See City of Victorville Personnel Rules, Rule X, Section 4.) (See Family and Medical Leave Act Policy No. B-25)

13. Employee Assistance Program – The City provides for a confidential counseling program for employees and eligible dependents.

14. Unemployment Insurance – May provide income for the employee if laid off or involuntarily terminated for reasons other than misconduct.

15. Life insurance - Group term life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment insurance is paid by the City at the rate of . 162 per thousand dollars of base salary and is rounded to the nearest $1,000. For Full- time employees, the benefit is one times annual salary, to a maximum of $250,000. A maximum of $10,000 life insurance policy is paid by the City for Council Members.

16. Short-Term Disability (STD) Insurance – Full-time employees shall contribute .61% per $100 of monthly salary. Employee premiums are post -tax; therefore, benefits will not be taxed upon receipt of payment.

Employees may be eligible to receive disability payments after 7 days of missed work, and benefits shall continue for 13 weeks for a qualifying illness or injury. STD pays 60% of employees’ weekly base pay, with a minimum of $50 per week, up to a maximum of $1,600 per week. Part -time employees are not eligible. (See City of Victorville Personnel Rules, Rule X, Section 12.) (See Family and Medical Leave Act Policy No. B-25).

17. Long- Term Disability – The City provides coverage for full -time employees after 90 days of disability.

The City’s premium is $.70 per $100 of monthly salary and covers 66.67% of employees’ monthly salary.

Minimum of $50 per month to a maximum of $5,000 per month.

18. Safety shoes - All employees, with the exception of Safety Personnel, who are required to wear safety shoes, shall receive $ 175 reimbursement per fiscal year for purchase of one pair of shoes. Exceptions are governed by Administrative Policy No. G-7.

19. Uniforms - Payment for non-safety uniform service shall not exceed $174 per year per employee for those employees required to wear uniforms. Reimbursement to Victorville Municipal Utilities Service employees who maintain their own uniforms, due to specialized uniforms and handling, shall not exceed $300 per year.

The following Victorville Fire Department Positions will receive uniform allowance as follows: Division Chief, Battalion Chief, Training Officer, Fire Captain, Fire Engineer and Firefighter/P aramedic $58.33 per month. Fire Marshal, Fire Prevention Inspector $37.50 per month, EMS Coordinator $45.83 per month.

Per CalPERS PEPRA legislation passed January 1, 2013, Uniform allowance is not pensionable for PEPRA CalPERS members.

20. Stand -by Pay – Available to qualified full -time non-safety and non- exempt regular employees who are required to be immediately available for duty. Employees called to work while on Stand-by will be paid at a rate of $300 per week plus their regular rate of pay for the hours actually worked, subject to FLSA overtime provisions.

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 10

21. Bilingual Pay – Upon the recommendation of the Department Head and based on the need of the Department, employees who are proficient in speaking a qualified foreign language shall receive $50.00 per month of additional pay as a bilingual pay incentive. To be eligible, personnel must pass the City’s written and oral exam. Currently the qualified foreign language is Spanish.

22. Tuition Reimbursement – Available to full-time regular employees, after one year of full-time service. All courses taken for reimbursement must be approved by the Department Head and the Personnel Officer prior to the beginning of the course. Courses eligible for reimbursement must be job related and toward a related degree.

Tuition reimbursement will include any associated fees including books, permits and other required fees (excluding shipping costs) up to a maximum of $3,000 per fiscal year based on prior approval by the Department Head and Personnel Officer. The Tuition Reimbursement program may be suspended if allocated funds are exhausted and/or if the Council chooses not to allocate the funds necessary to continue the program in any particular fiscal year due to budget constraints. (See Tuition Reimbursement Administrative Policy No: B-31)

23. Work Week – Full-time non-safety employees will work a 40-hour week schedule. All Safety non- shift employees will work a 40-hour week schedule. Safety Shift Personnel will work on a 48/96 schedule with FLSA overtime based on actual hours worked over 212 hours in a 28-day work cycle.

Work schedules:

The work schedule effective July 13th, 2019 will be a 9/80 schedule, whereby all full -time employees will work 40 hours per week. The work week begins each Friday at 12:01pm and ends each Friday at 12:00pm, with the exception of certain Library Staff, Airport Field Operati ons Workers, VMUS Field Operations Workers, Community Services Park Maintenance Workers, Development Code Enforcement Officers, Engineering Traffic Field Workers and Development Animal Control Officers, who will have a work week beginning each Saturday at 12:00am and ending each Friday at 11:59pm.

Overtime will be calculated for all non- exempt employees, who exceed 40 total actual hours worked over a consecutive 168 hours or 7 days (per FLSA) between these times, excluding Safety Shift Personnel.

All Safety, non-shift employees, will work a 40-hour week schedule. Safety Shift Personnel will work on a 48/96 schedule with FLSA overtime based on actual hours worked over 212 hours in a 28-day work cycle. Safety Shift Personnel’s 28-day FLSA period begins on the first Saturday of each FLSA period at 12:00am and ends on the last Friday of FLSA period at 11:59pm.

For all non-exempt, employees, including Safety Shift Personnel, only hours actually worked will be counted when calculating overtime pay. Approved paid leave shall not be considered as time worked for the purpose of computing the total number of hours worked in the work period. Overtime is calculated pursuant to federal law.

Battalion Chiefs who work a shift or part of a shift that requires work hours beyond standard hours in a given pay period, and excluding hours worked as a result of a shift trade, will be compensated for extra hours worked at a straight time hourly rate.

24. City of Victorville Fire Department Additional Compensation – Dependent on qualifications and need of the department:

• Hazardous Materials (Hazmat) Specialist Qualification $100 per month:
o Personnel with California State Fire Training Hazmat 1A -1G certification and task book

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 11

completion will be entitled to $100 per month additional pay for maintaining that specialty.

• Haz-Mat Specialist Qualifications and Designated Haz-Mat Team Member $375 per month:
o Personnel who are routinely and consistently exposed to toxic, radioactive, explosive or other hazardous substances or perform hazardous activities to implement health or safety procedures and possess a California State Fire Training Haz -Mat 1A -1G certification and task book completion, and assigned to the Department’s Haz -Mat Response Team will be entitled to an additional $375 per month while maintaining placement on the Team and specialty.

• Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) Specialist Qualifications $100 per month:
o Personnel with California State Fire Training Low -Angle Rescue, Rescue 1 and 2, Confined Space Rescue, and Water Rescue will be entitled to $100 per month additional pay for maintaining that specialty.

• USAR Specialist Qualifications and Designated USAR Team Member $375 per month:
o Personnel who are routinely and consistently involved in search and rescue involving extrication and initial medical stabilization of individuals trapped in confined spaces, including transportation accidents mines and collapsed trenches. It also includes a multi -hazard discipline such as earthquakes, hurricanes, storms, floods, terrorist activities and hazardous materials. Personnel with California State Fire Training Low -Angle Rescue, Rescue 1 and 2, Confined Space Rescue, and Water Rescue, and assigned to the Department’s USAR Response Team will be entitled to an additional $375 per month while maintaining placement on the Team and specialty.

• Paramedic Pay available to Fire Captains and Fire Engineers $200 per month:
o Captains and Engineers who maintain the Paramedic License, and are available to function as Paramedics in case of need, will be entitled to an additional $200 per month while license and ability are maintained.

• Fire Instructor I certification pay available to Fire Captains $100 per month:
o Fire Captains with California State Fire Training Fire Instructor 1 and task book completion will be entitled to $100 per month additional pay for maintaining that specialty and being available as a lead instructor.

• Company Officer certification pay available to Fire Engineers and Fire Captains $100 per month:
o Engineers and Captains with California State Fire Training Company Officer 2A -E certification and task book completion will be entitled to $100 per month additional pay for maintaining that specialty.

• Fire Apparatus Driver/Operator (with License) certification pay available to Firefighter/Paramedics $100 per month:
o Firefighter/Paramedics with California State Fire Training Fire Apparatus Driver/Operator 1A-B, and the appropriate California Driver’s License endorsement will be entitled to $100 per month additional pay for maintaining that specialty, and being available to operate apparatus based on Department need.

Resolution 22-020 Mid-Year 2021-2022 Table of Organization Page 12

• Paramedic Preceptor pay (when supervising) available to all Fire Personnel California State Licensed Paramedics when assigned a student $100 per month:
o All personnel with current California Paramedic license who routinely and consistently are assigned to supervise paramedic students will be entitled to $100 per month during the time they are assigned a student.

• Bilingual Pay (Must pass a Spanish written and oral exam) available to Fire Captains, Fire Engineers, Firefighter/Paramedics $50 per month:
o All personnel passing the Department’s written and oral Spanish language exam will be entitled to an additional $50 per month.

• Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) – Compensation paid for normal full -time work schedule including premium pay required by FLSA.

• Fire Captains Working Out of Classification - Fire Captains Working out of Class up as Battalion Chief shall earn one half hour pay for every four hours worked. To be eligible to work, as a Battalion Chief the employee must meet the minimum standards required for the role as determined by the Fire Chief.

ATTACHMENT C
Title Salary Range Current Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Effective 1-1-22 Aquatic Aide M $14.00 $15.00
Recreation Leader I M $14.00 $15.00
Lifeguard 1 $15.25 $16.25
Senior Recreation Leader 1 $15.25 $16.25
Senior Lifeguard 2 $16.50 $17.50
Administrative Intern 2 $16.50 $17.50
Library Aide 2 $16.50 $17.50
Recreation Specialist 3 $18.00 $19.00
Pool Manager 3 $18.00 $19.00
Library Clerk 4 $20.25 $21.00
Office Aide 4 $20.25 $21.00
Maintenance Aide 5 $21.50 $22.00
Vehicle Service Worker 5 $21.50 $22.00
Library Technician 6 $23.25 $23.25
Engineering Intern 6 $23.25 $23.25
Recreation Supervisor - PT 10 $40.05 $40.05
Assistant Engineer - PT 20 $70.00 $70.00

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 PART-TIME TABLE OF COMPENSATION
Revised and adopted by the City of Victorville Council as of 1/1/2022

Item Number: 12
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Sophie Smith, Deputy City Manager

Subject:

Consultant/Professional Services Agreement with Reward Strategy Group Recommendation:

Staff recommends that City Council approve a Consultant/Professional Services Agreement with Reward Strategy Group for a Compensation Study in an amount not to exceed Eighty-five Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 dollars ($85,300).

Fiscal Impact:

Funding is available in account 1001520-52300 for the Consultant/Professional Services Agreement with Reward Strategy Group (RSG) in the amount of Eighty-five Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 ($85,300) with no additional appropriation being needed at this time.

Background:

A current Compensation Study in needed which is intended to provide updated and competitive salary information. The last comprehensive compensation and classification study was completed in July of 2013 by Public Sector Personnel Consultants. Once the completed report was delivered to the City, it was reviewed and the recommended changes to the benefits, table of organization, and salary schedule were adopted at the June 17, 2014, Regular City Council meeting. The need to conduct a more recent salary study was discussed during the City Council’s budget meeting in June 2021.

Due to ongoing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) negotiations with the Victorville Professional Firefighters Association (Local 3710), the need recently arose to complete a Compensation study for the five (5) represented classifications within the Fire Department. Therefore, a request for proposal was sent out to seven (7) firms in January of 2022. As a result of the solicited proposals, the proposal submitted by RSG was accepted by City management and RSG began compiling the necessary information 2 4
8 2
needed to complete the Compensation Study for the five (5) represented classifications within the Fire Department in February of 2022.

Once the Compensation study was started for the represented Fire Department classifications, the City solicited proposals for a City-wide Compensation study. A request for proposal was sent out to seven (7) firms in February of 2022. City management along with a Human Resources representative met with firms to evaluate the proposals received and discuss the scope of work and timeframe required for the study. At this time, based on the firm’s qualifications, and pursuant to Municipal Code 2.28.280, staff recommends RSG to complete the City-wide Compensation Study.

Discussion:

The City requests a qualified Consultant to perform a Compensation Study to help determine if it is competitive in the market. The City’s objectives of this study include; attract and retain qualified employees; ensure a pay plan that is consistent with prudent public practices; align salaries proportionate with assigned duties; provide a defensible and technically sound basis for compensating employees; and allow the City a competitive position with other comparable government entities and private employers within the same geographic areas.

The proposed Compensation Study will be delivered to the City in a three-phased approach as outlined in the attached RSG Proposals (Attachment B). The first phase referred to as Phase 1 (a) in the attached RSG proposal, includes the Fire Department’s total compensation survey which will address the five (5) represented classifications. The estimated completion date for this phase is March 2022. The second phase referred to as Phase 1 (b), will include a base salary study for a sample of approximately 54 benchmark classes from the City’s 150+ classifications. The estimated completion date for this phase is May 2022. If Phase 1 (b) is exercised, the third and final phase, referred to as Phase 2 in the attached RSG proposal, will begin and includes two elements which will be conducted simultaneously: (1) benefit survey and analysis for the non-fire classifications studied in the second phase; and (2) internal job content evaluation of all City classifications and illustrated allocations of benchmarked and non-benchmarked classifications into the City’s salary range schedule sometime in the future. The estimated completion date for this phase is August of 2022.

Once received, recommendations for any adjustments to salary or total compensation will be brought to City Council for approval.

Staff remains available for any comments or questions.

Attachments: A. Consultant/Professional Services Agreement - RSG

ATTACHMENT A

CONSULTANT/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - RSG
1 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101

CONSULTANT/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROVIDER AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AND
REWARD STRATEGY GROUP, INC.

FOR

COMPENSATION CONSULTING SERVICES,
PROJECT ESC22-101

THIS CONSULTANT/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROVIDER AGREEMENT (hereinafter “Agreement”), is made and entered into by and between THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE, a municipal corporation located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, hereinafter referred to as the “City” , and Reward Strategy Group, Inc (RSG), a California corporation , hereinafter referred to as “ Consultant.” City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RE
CITALS:

W
HEREAS, the City requires Consultant/Professional Services for Compensation Consulting Services; and
W
HEREAS, Consultant represents that it is fully qualified to perform the consulting and/or professional services required for performance under this Agreement by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and its employees; and W
HEREAS, in light of the facts set forth above, the City desires to retain the services of a qualified Consultant to provide, on an independent contractor basis, Compensation Consulting Services; and
NO

W THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND

PROMISES CONTAINED HEREIN AND FOR SUCH OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE

CONSIDERATION, RECEIPT OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. RECITALS
The
Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by this reference, as though set forth fully herein.

Section 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
C
onsultant shall provide to the City those services set forth in the Scope of Services, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated as part of this Agreement by this reference. 2 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101 Section 3. COMPENSATION
The Cit
y shall pay to Consultant a sum not to exceed Eighty-five Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($85,300.00) for faithful performance of the services to be rendered under this Agreement, subject to the Proposal provisions of Section 4, below . No expense reimbursements, including, but not limited to, reimbursements for travel, parking, lodging, and/or meals shall be paid to Consultant unless such expense reimbursements: (i) are specifically provided for and described by nature and type in Exhibit “ A”, below; (ii) appear on Consultant ’s monthly invoices to City; (iii) are supported by the appropriate receipts and other such documentation as the City shall require; and (iv) are directly related to the Scope of Services to be performed under this Agreement. In addition, any and all reimbursements shall be made in accordance with any City policy governing same.

Section 4. CONSULTANT’S COST PROPOSAL
The Cit
y shall pay Consultant as provided in the Cost Proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated as part of this Agreement by this reference. The provisions of Exhibit “ A” notwithstanding, in order to receive payments, Consultant shall be required to submit to the City detailed monthly invoices which include, if applicable, a description of all services/tasks performed, the number of hours expended on each service/task, the name of the person performing the service/task, and expense reimbursement information, if any, as required by Section 3, above. Provided that services have been satisfactorily rendered, invoices shall be paid by the City approximately thirty (30) working days following receipt of Consultant’s invoice.

Section 5. RESERVED
Section 6. TERM OF AGREEMENT
Thi
s Agreement shall be for an Initial Term of Seven (7) Months , commencing on February 16, 2022 (the “Commencement Date”) and expiring on September 16, 2022 (the “Termination Date”) (the “Term”) , unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 21 of this Agreement. From and after the Termination Date, and upon subsequent Agreement by the Parties, this Agreement may continue on a month- to-month basis until terminated pursuant to Section 21 below.

Section 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
It
is the express intention of the Parties that Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee, agent, joint venture, or partner of the City. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between the City and Consultant or any employee or agent of Consultant . Both P arties acknowledge that Consultant is not an employee for state or federal tax purposes or any other purpose. Consultant shall retain the right to perform services for others during the term of this Agreement.

Section 8. REPRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REGARDING INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR’S STATUS OF

CONSULTANT
a. C
onsultant represents and acknowledges the following:
3 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101

(1) The City is not required to provide any training or legal counsel to Consultant or its employees in order for Consultant to perform the services described in this Agreement.
(2) Performance of the services described in this Agreement does not have to be integrated into the daily business operations of the City.

(3) The services described in this Agreement can be performed without the use of City equipment, materials, tools, or facilities, unless otherwise provided under a separate Agreement.

(4) Nothing in this A greement shall be interpreted to imply that the City must maintain any contractual relationship with Consultant on a continuing basis after termination of this Agreement.

(5) The City will not be requested or demanded to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wage, or other such compensation to any person employed by Consultant to perform the services described in this Agreement.

(6) Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are employees of the City.

b. The City represents and acknowledges the following:

(1) Consultant is solely responsible for determining who, under the supervision or direction of Consultant, will perform the services set forth in this Agreement.

(2) The City will not hire, supervise, or pay any employees or assistants working for Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prevent the City from hiring Consultant’s employees or assistants after termination of this Agreement.
(3) Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to imply that Consultant must maintain any contractual relationship with the City on a continuing basis after termination of this Agreement.

(4) It is the sole responsibility of Consultant to set the hours in which Consultant performs or plans to perform the services set forth in this Agreement.

(5) Consultant is not required to devote full time to the business operations of the City in order to perform the services set forth in this Agreement.

(6) Unless deemed necessary under certain circumstances, Consultant is not required to perform the services set forth in this Agreement at City Hall or on City-owned property.

(7) Other than attendance at required public meetings and public hearings, and complying with the provisions of the Proposal set forth in Exhibit A and any procedural requirements set forth by law, Consultant is not required to perform the services set forth in this Agreement in any particular order or sequence.

(8) Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to preclude Consultant from working for other persons or firms, provided that such work does not create a conflict of interest.

4 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101

Section 9. NOT AGENT OF THE CITY

a. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed, construed, or represented by the City or Consultant or by any third person to create the relationship of principal and agent.

b. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of the City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind the City to any obligation whatsoever.

Section 10. LICENSES AND PERMITS

Consultant represents that it has obtained and will maintain at all times during the Initial Term (and during the Option Period, if applicable) of this Agreement all business licenses, including but not limited to a City of Victorville business license, professional licenses or certifications, or permits necessary for performing the services described in this Agreement.

Section 11. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE; WARRANTY

a. Consultant agrees to perform all services required by this Agreement in a professional and competent manner, in accordance with the degree of skill and diligence which is normally employed by reputable professionals performing similar services under similar conditions in the same or similar locality. Such services shall also be performed in a manner which is reasonably satisfactory to Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee.

b. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that it:

(1) Has thoroughly investigated and considered the services and work to be performed;

(2) Has investigated the issues regarding the scope of services to be provided;

(3) Has carefully considered how the services and related work should be performed; and

(4) Fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions associated with performance of the services required by this Agreement.

Section 12. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK

Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing f rom those inherent in the services or as represented by the City, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not provide any services, except at Consultant 's risk, until written instructions are received from Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee.

Section 13. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Consultant covenants that it does not have any interest, nor shall it acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of Consultant’s services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of services under this Agreement, no officer, employee or agent of Consultant having such interest shall be 5 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101 employed by it. In the event the City determines that Consultant must disclose its financial interests by completing and filing a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant shall file such Form 700 with the City Clerk’s Office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk. Acquisition or maintenance of a conflicting interest by Consultant may result in termination of this Agreement by the City.

Section 14. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
C
onsultant shall comply with all local, state, and federal laws and regulations applicable to the services to be rendered hereunder, including any rule, regulation, or bylaw governing the conduct or performance of Consultant or its employees, officers, or board members.

Section 15. C OMMERCIAL GENERAL AND AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

INSURANCE
a. C
onsultant shall procure and maintain at its own expense, during the I nitial Term of this Agreement (and during the Option Period, if applicable) , Commercial G eneral Liability Insurance, of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, death, loss, or damage resulting from the wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents and independent contractors.
b. C
onsultant shall further procure and maintain, at its own expense, during the Initial Term of this Agreement, (and during the Option Period, if applicable), Commercial Vehicle Liability Insurance covering personal injury and property damage, of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit, covering any vehicle utilized by Consultant or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors in performing the services required by this Agreement.

Section 16. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
a. C
onsultant shall procure and maintain at its own expense, during the I nitial Term of this Agreement ( and during the Option Period, if applicable), W orkers' Compensation Insurance, providing coverage as required by the California State Workers' Compensation Law. b. I
f any class of employees employed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement is not protected by the California State Workers' Compensation Law, Consultant shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the City.

Section 17. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
a. P
rofessional Liability Insurance or Errors and Omissions insurance as appr
opriate to Consultant’s profession shall be required and written on a policy form specifically designed to provide coverage for and protect against the negligent acts, errors and omissions of the Consultant in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. A minimum limit of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate must be provided.

Section 18. ADDITIONAL INSURED
N
otwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any required insurance policies or any subsequent endorsements attached thereto, all insurance policies, except for the Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability, shall be endorsed to name the City and its officers, 6 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101 employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors, including, without limitation, the City Attorney, as Additional Insureds.

Section 19. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION RIGHTS
C
onsultant shall require the carriers of all required insurance policies, with exception to Professional Liability, to waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents, and independent contractors and subcontractors. Each policy of insurance shall be endorsed to reflect such waiver.

Section 20. PROOF OF INSURANCE COVERAGE; REQUIRED

ENDORSEMENTS
a. C
onsultant shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies authorized to transact insurance business in the State of California, the policies of insurance required by this Agreement and furnish to the City Clerk certificates of insurance evidencing the required coverage, and policy endorsements at least one (1) business day prior to the commencement of any services to be performed under this Agreement. b. The
policies and certificates of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that in the event of cancellation or amendment of any required insurance policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than thirty (30) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. In the case of cancellation for non-payment, ten (10) days advance written notice shall be given.
c. E
ach policy and certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that the policy shall not be terminated or expire without first providing thirty (30) days written notice to the City of such termination or expiration.
d. E
ach policy and certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that the policy will be maintained throughout the Initial Term (and during the Option Period, if applicable), of this Agreement.
e. The Com
mercial General Liability and Vehicle Liability policies shall be endorsed t
o contain the following provision: “For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s coverage shall be primary with respect to the City. Any insurance maintained by the City shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.” Section 21. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION
a. Thi
s Agreement may be terminated or suspended without cause by either Party at any time, provided that the Party initiating the termination provides the other Party at least thirty (30) days advance written notice of such termination or suspension. In the event of such termination, the City shall only be liable for payment under the payment provisions of this Agreement for satisfactory services rendered or supplies actually furnished prior to the effective date of termination.
b. Thi
s Agreement may be terminated or suspended with cause by either Party at any time, provided that the Party initiating termination provides the other Party at least ten (10) days advance written notice of such termination or suspension. In the event of such termination, the City shall only be liable for payment under the payment provisions of this Agreement for 7 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101 satisfactory services rendered or supplies actually furnished prior to the effective date of termination.

Section 22. TIME OF THE ESSENCE
Ti
me is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

Section 23. INDEMNIFICATION
a. E
xcept as set forth in Subsection b of this Section 23, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall immediately defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, representatives, and agents (the “City Indemnitees”), from and against those actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, for any personal injuries, deaths, or property damage, including property owned by the City (collectively “Claims”) which may arise out of Consultant's negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of the services described in this Agreement, unless such Claims are proven to be caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City Indemnitees. b. The
provisions of this Subsection b apply only in the event that Consultant is a design professional within the meaning of California Civil Code section 2782.8 (“Design Professional”). The term Design Professional, as defined in said section, is limited to licensed architects, licensed landscape architects, registered professional engineers, professional land surveyors, and the business entities that offer such services in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Business and Professions Code. (
1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection a above, to the extent that the services to be provided under this Agreement are those of a Design Professional, Consultant's duty to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City Indemnitees shall be limited to the extent that any Claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants in the performance of the services described in this Agreement. (
2) In no event shall the costs of defense charged to Consultant exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault, except as otherwise set forth in said Civil Code section 2782.8, the provisions of which are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference.

Nothing in this Subsection b shall be construed to require Consultant to provide indemnification for Claims caused by the active negligence or willful misconduct of the City Indemnitees. c. The C
ity does not and shall not waive any rights that it may have against Consultant under this Section, because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The hold harmless and indemnification provisions of this Section 23 shall apply regardless of whether said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, c ost, or expense described herein.
d. The obl
igation to indemnify and defend, as set forth in this Section 23, is bindi ng on t
he successors, assigns, or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the expiration or any early termination of this Agreement.
8 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101

Section 24. REPORTS

Upon request by Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee or as otherwise required by this Agreement, including but not limited to, the Scope of Services set forth in Exhibit “A”, Consultant shall prepare and submit reports to the City concerning Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement.

Section 25. RECORDS

a. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee, to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services.

b. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

c. Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee, shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records.

d. Records and supporting documents pertaining to the use of funds paid to Consultant hereunder shall be retained by Consultant and made available to Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee, for purposes of performing an audit for a period of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Agreement.

Section 26. RESERVED

Section 27. CONFIDENTIALITY; OWNERSHIP OF WORK

a. Any and all documents and information obtained from the City or prepared by Consultant for the City shall be kept strictly confidential unless otherwise provided by applicable law. All City data, documents and information shall be returned to the City upon termination of the Agreement.

b. Any drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents, or other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee, or as required by applicable law.

c. Consultant shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of the City, except with the prior written approval of Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee, or as required by applicable law.

d. All original documents, reports, designs, computer files and all other materials prepared by Consultant in the course of performing the services pursuant to this Agreement, whether completed or in progress, are the property of the City and shall be surrendered to the City upon the completion of Consultant’s services or when requested by Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee. Such materials may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of Consultant.

9 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101 e. Consultant ’s covenants under this Section 27 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

Section 28. PRINCIPAL REPRESENTATIVES
a. A
llan M. Crecelius, President , is designated as the principal representative of Consultant for purposes of communicating with the City on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. b. S
ophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager, or her designee shall be the principal representative of the City for purposes of communicating with Consultant on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. c. E
ither Party may designate another individual as its principal representative by giving written notice of such designation to the other Party.

Section 29. MODIFICATIONS AND AMENDMENTS; EXTRA SERVICES a. Thi
s Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written instrument signed by
both Parties.
b. D
uring the I nitial Term, the City may request that the Consultant perform Extra Services. As used herein, "Extra Services" means any services, which are determined by the City to be necessary for the proper completion of Compensation Consulting Services , but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. A written instrument signed by both Parties shall be required to authorize performance of and payment for Extra Services.

Section 30. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a. Thi
s Agreement supersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous Agreement s, either oral or written, between the City and Consultant with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
b. Thi
s Agreement contains all of the covenants and Agreements between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and each Party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or Agreements have been made by or on behalf of any Party, except those covenants and Agreements in this Agreement. c. No
Agreement, statement, or promise with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, which is not contained in this Agreement, or in a valid modification or amendment to this Agreement, shall be valid or binding on either Party.

Section 31. AMBIGUITIES
Thi
s Agreement is in all respects intended by each Party hereto to be deemed and construed to have been jointly prepared by the Parties and the Parties hereby expressly agree that any uncertainty or ambiguity existing herein shall not be interpreted agains t either of them.

Except as expressly limited by this paragraph, all of the applicable rules of interpretation of contract shall govern the interpretation of any uncertainty or ambiguity of this Agreement. 10 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties agree that Exhibit “A” is attached hereto for reference purposes and to the extent there are any ambiguities, inconsistencies or conflicts between the terms of this Consultant/Professional Services Standard Provider Agreement and Exhibit “A” the terms of this Consultant/Professional Services Standard Provider Agreement shall control and nothing set forth in Exhibit “A” shall be deemed to supersede any of the provisions of this Consultant/Professional Services Standard Provider Agreement.

S ection 32. NOTICES
a. A
ny notice to be provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the Parties as follows:

To t
he City: Sophie L. Smith, Deputy City Manager
City Manager Department
City of Victorville
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
To C
onsultant: Allan M. Crecelius, President
Reward Strategy Group, Inc. (RSG)
5283 Pearlman Way
San Diego, CA 92130
b. N
otices, payments, and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the second (2nd) day after deposit in the United States mail.

Section 33. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND

EM PLOYEES
N
o officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount, which may become due to Consultant or to its successor(s), or for any breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

Section 34. REVIEW BY ATTORNEYS
E
ach Party hereto has had its attorney(s) review this Agreement and all related documents. Each Party hereto has consulted with its attorney(s) and has negotiated the terms of this Agreement based on such consultation.

Section 35. WAIVER
a. N
o waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the Party making the waiver.
11 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101 b. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision.
c
. Failure of either Party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision or any of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

Section 36. ASSIGNMENT
Thi
s Agreement shall not be assigned by either Party without prior written consent of the other Party.

Section 37. CARE OF WORK
The per
formance of services by Consultant or the payment of money by the City shall not relieve Consultant from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work at no further cost to the City, when such incomplete, inaccurate or defective work is due to the negligence of Consultant.

Section 38. CAPTIONS AND HEADINGS
The c
aptions and headings contained in this Agreement are provided for identification purposes only and shall not be interpreted to limit or define the content of the provisions described under the respective caption or heading.

Section 39. SUCCESSORS, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS
E
xcept as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, endorsees, assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of each of the Parties to this Agreement and, likewise, shall inure to the benefit of the successors, endorsees, assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of each of the Parties.

Section 40. GENDER
I
n this Agreement, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the masculine, feminine and neuter genders and the singular and the plural shall include one another.

Section 41. SEVERABILITY
I
f any one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein is declared invalid, void, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall not affect, impair, or invalidate any of the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein.

Section 42. GOVERNING LAW
The v
alidity of this Agreement and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the Parties under this Agreement, shall be construed pursuant to and in accordance with California law.
12 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101

Section 43. DEFAULT

a. Failure or delay by any Par ty to this Agreement to perform any material term or provision of this Agreement shall constitute a default under this Agreement; provided however, that if the Party who is otherwise claimed to be in default by the other Party commences to cure, correct, o r remedy the alleged default within fifteen (15) days after receipt of written notice specifying such default and shall diligently complete such cure, correction, or remedy, such Party shall not be deemed to be in default hereunder.

b. The Party claiming that a default has occurred shall give written notice of default to the Party in default, specifying the alleged default. Delay in giving such notice shall not constitute a waiver of any default nor shall it change the time of default; provided, however, the injured Party shall have no right to exercise any remedy for a default hereunder without delivering the written default notice, as specified herein.

c. Any failure or delay by a Party in asserting any of its rights or remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any rights or remedies associated with a default.

d. In the event that a default by any Party to this Agreement may remain uncured for more than fifteen (15) days following written notice, as provided above, the injured Party shall be entitled to seek any appropriate remedy or damages by initiating legal proceedings.

Section 44. CUMULATIVE REMEDIES

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default of any ot her default by the other Party.

Section 45. VENUE

All proceedings involving disputes over the terms, provisions, covenants, or conditions contained in this Agreement and all proceedings involving any enforcement action related to this Agreement shall be initiated and conducted in the applicable court or forum in San Bernardino County, California.

Section 46. ATTORNEYS’ FEES

In the event any action, suit, or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement, or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such suit or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, from the losing Party, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof.

Section 47. EFFECTIVENESS OF AGREEMENT

This Agreement shall not be binding upon the City, until signed by the authorized representative(s) of Consultant , approved by the City ’s Risk Manager, and executed by the authorized City personnel or Mayor.
13 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101

Section 48. REPRESENTATIONS OF PARTIES AND PERSONS EXECUTING

AGREEMENT

a. Each of the Parties to this Agreement hereby represents that all necessary and appropriate actions of their governing bodies have been taken to make this Agreement a binding obligation of each of the Parties hereto.

b. The persons executing this Agreement warran t that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of and bind the Parties each purports to represent.

Section 49. COUNTERPARTS

This Agreement may be executed by the Parties in counterparts, and when executed by each of the Parties, each counterpart shall be deemed to be a part of this Agreement.

(END OF THIS PAGE)

14 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101 I
N WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the dates written below.

TH
E CITY OF VICTORVILLE REWARD STRATEGY GROUP, INC.

B
y:______________________________ By:_____________________________ Debra Jones, Allan M. Crecelius,
Mayor President
D
ated: ___________________________ Dated:__________________________ A
TTEST
B
y:______________________________
Jennifer Thompson,
City Clerk
D
ated: ___________________________
THE

CITY OF VICTORVILLE APPROVED AS TO STANDARD
FORM:

By: _______________________________ By: ____________________________ Lee Brown, Andre de Bortnowsky,
Risk Manager City Attorney
Dated:______________________________ Dated:__________________________ 15 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/RSG, Inc./Project ESC22-101

EXHIBIT A
SC

OPE OF SERVICES/
CONSULTANT’S COST PROPOSAL
5283 Pearlman Way | San Diego, CA 92130 | 858 259-3800 | Fax 858 792-7465 | www.rewardstrategy.com March
8, 2022
Ms. Sophie Smith
Deputy City Manager
City of Victorville
Dear Sophie:

This letter supplements and revises my correspondence with Josie Trevino, dated February 28, regarding RSG’s assistance in compensation consulting for the City’s remaining 150+ classifications beyond the Fire Department classes on which we are currently engaged. Based on our video meeting this morning, we determined a modified approach to the work will be necessary to enable delivery of priority salary survey information by mid-May.

We agreed to break the work and timing into phases:

Phase 1 (a): The ongoing Fire Department total compensation (cash & benefits) survey, which has already been initiated and addresses five classifications. Completion date is March 23.

Phase 1 (b): A new base salary-only study for a representative sample of approximately 54 benchmark classes from among the City’s remaining 150+ classifications. A tentative list of these benchmark classes is found in Attachment A, for our discussion. The completion date for this phase is May 17. The proposed survey agencies are in Appendix B.

Phase 2: This phase will encompass two elements, which can be conducted simultaneously: (a) the benefit survey and analyses for the non-fire classes in Phase 1(b); (b) the internal job content evaluation of all City classifications and RSG-illustrated allocations of benchmarked and non-benchmarked classes into the City’s salary range schedule for fiscal year 2022 ‒ 2023. This phase’s timing would likely cover June‒August 2022.

The study processes and methodology will remain the same as outlined in RSG’s February 28 letter, only the work sequencing, timing and consulting budgets have been revised.

PROFESSIONAL FEES
Phase 1 (a) ‒ This ongoing study has an agreed-upon budget of $15,700.

Phase 1 (b) ‒ RSG estimates this base salary survey assistance will result in professional fees between $39,800 and $44,600.

Phase 2 ‒ This phase’s budget will likely be between $23,000 and $25,000.

Sincerely,
Allan M. Crecelius, President
Attachment A
Tentative Listing of Benchmarks
Phase 1(b)

1. Animal Care & Control Manager

2. Animal Control Officer

3. Deputy City Clerk

4. City Librarian

5. Administrative Secretary

6. Battalion Chief

7. Finance Manager

8. Finance Supervisor

9. Finance Analyst

10. Finance Technician

11. Accountant

12. Senior Account Clerk

13. Account Clerk

14. Customer Service Representative

15. Economic Development Manager

16. Building Inspector

17. Code Enforcement Officer II

18. Senior Planner

19. Associate Planner

20. Assistant Planner

21. Recreation Supervisor

22. Senior Administrative Analyst

23. Administrative Analyst

24. Executive Assistant to City Manager

25. Administrative Secretary

26. Secretary

27. Office Assistant

28. Public Works Manager

29. Public Works Supervisor

30. Maintenance Supervisor

31. Maintenance Lead Worker

32. Senior Maintenance Worker

33. Maintenance Worker

34. Senior Equipment Operator

35. Senior Mechanic

36. Mechanic

37. City Surveyor

38. Senior Civil Engineer

39. Associate Civil Engineer

40. Assistant Engineer I

41. Water Manager

42. Water Distribution Supervisor

43. Senior Water Distribution Worker

44. Water Distribution Lead Worker

45. Water Supply Supervisor

46. Senior Water Supply Operator

47. Water Supply Lead Operator

48. Human Resources Specialist

49. Technology Manager

50. Technology Coordinator

51. Technology Technician

52. Environmental Programs Manager

53. Facilities Manager

54. Risk Manager

55. Airport Operations Officer
Attachment B
Proposed Survey Organizations
Phase 1(b)

1. City of Apple Valley

2. City of Hesperia

3. City of Fontana

4. City of Chino

5. City of Corona

6. City of Rancho Cucamonga

7. City of Upland

8. City of Ontario

9. City of Palmdale

10. City of Lancaster

11. County of San Bernardino

12. County of Riverside

Note: Fire Chief and Fire Battalion Chief will be surveyed against the Fire comparison agencies.

Item Number: 13
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water

Subject:

Amendment to the General Services Provider Standard Agreement with Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. to Furnish and Deliver Waterworks Products and Supplies.

Recommendation:

That the Honorable Victorville Water District Board of Directors (Board) approve Amendment No. 3 to the General Services Provider Agreement by and between Victorville Water District (District) and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. (Ferguson) to Furnish and Deliver Waterworks Products and Supplies, Project CC20-014, for an additional amount of $267,275.

Fiscal Impact:

The current agreement with Ferguson is for $600,000 and the amended amount of $267,275 will bring the new agreement to $867,275. No additional appropriation is required. The account code below has sufficient funds to cover the cost of these services:
4100530 – 52445
o4100530 – Water Fund, Field Services
o52445 – Meter Service Installation
Background:

On February 17, 2015, the Board approved the award of a General Services Provider Standard Agreement between the District and Ferguson, formerly known as Equarius Waterworks. The agreement was for Project CC15-034, which allowed the District to implement an Automated Meter Reading (AMR) system and replace all residential meters throughout the District. The District opted for Neptune meters which are not only accurate and dependable revenue meters, but also fully compatible with AMR/AMI technology.

Ferguson is the District’s sole source provider for meters and meter antennas as they are the only California distributor of Neptune meters.
2 4
4 4
The District must maintain water meters and meter antennas in inventory in order to ensure that new development is able to connect to the District’s water system and to have stock on hand to replace existing meters when needed. At the onset of COVID-19, an order of water meters would take approximately three to four weeks to be delivered.

Currently, the same order of meters is taking approximately sixteen weeks to arrive.

The District began experiencing longer lead times when ordering supplies and materials needed to maintain the District’s water system. Over the past six to eight months, the District’s vendors, including Ferguson, have drastically increased the lead times for most items ordered due to supply chain issues.

The new challenges our vendors are facing with their supply chains have required staff to adapt and modify how the District’s inventory and supplies are replenished. Staff has had to drastically increase the volume of water meters and other parts to continue to maintain the integrity of the District’s infrastructure and help ensure that new development is able to connect to our water system.

When new development is ready to be connected to the District’s water system, the developer must purchase a meter from the District that is then installed by staff. The cost the District pays for purchasing meters and keeping them in inventory is offset by the revenue collected when a developer buys the meters to connect their water service. As development increases throughout the District, the demand for water meters increases.

Furthermore, there is a direct correlation between the revenues collected from developers for meter purchases and the cost the District incurs for pre-purchasing the meters and ensuring their availability.

Discussion:

The District currently has an agreement with Ferguson to furnish and deliver waterworks products and supplies, including water meters and antennas. The estimated cost of meters and other parts and supplies that would have been purchased through Ferguson this fiscal year has increased due to staff having to order items several months in advance (and in larger quantities) due to longer lead times. Staff currently estimates that before the end of the current fiscal year, nearly 300 meters and antennas will be needed to meet the demands anticipated from new development.

The requested agreement increase presented herein is in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code §2.28.100(6), which affords city council the authority to award a contract for purchases of supplies and equipment or general services with a cost in excess of fifty thousand dollars. For these reasons, staff is recommending that the Victorville Water District Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 3 to the General Services Provider Agreement by and between the Victorville Water District and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. to Furnish and Deliver Waterworks Products and Supplies for an additional $267,275.

Staff remains available for any questions or comments the Board may have. 2 4
4 4
Attachments: A. Amendment No. 3
B. Municipal Code 2.28.100(6)
C. Sole Source Form
Attachment A
Agreement - Amendment No. 3
GENERAL SERVICES PROVIDER STANDARD AGREEMENT/Ferguson Enterprises, Inc./Project CC20- 014/Amendment 3

AMENDMENT NUMBER: THREE
TO

GENERAL SERVICES PROVIDER STANDARD AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
AND
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC.

FOR

FURNISH AND DELIVER WATERWORKS PRODUCTS AND SUPPLIES
PROJECT CC20-014

THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered in to this ____ day of _______, 2022, by and between the Victorville Water District , a County Water District and subsidiary district of the City of Victorville , organized and existing in the County of San Bernardino under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as “District”), and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., a Virginia corporation, hereinafter referred to as “ Service Provider.” The District and the Service Provid er are sometimes hereinafter referred to as a “Party” or and collectively referred to as the “Parties”.

Recitals

1. WHEREAS, the District has a General Services Provider Standard Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Original Agreement”) with the Service Provider to furnish and deliver various waterworks products and supplies on an as needed basis, Project CC20-014; and

2. WHEREAS, on or about August 18, 2020, Amendment One (1) was issued to the Original Agreement to amend Section 4., Proposal, to include Service Providers revised Proposal; and exercise Option 1 of 4, additional one-year periods, amending Section 6., Term of Agreement, to commence July 1 , 2020 and expire June 30, 2021. Section 3., Compensation, annual not to exceed sum of $900,000 (as approved by the Board at their meeting held July 7, 2020), remained unchanged; and

3. WHEREAS, on or about September 17
th, 2021 Amendment Two (2) was issued to the
Original Agreement to amend Section 3., Compensation, annual not to exceed sum from $900,000 to $600,000; amend Section 4., Proposal, to include Service Providers revised Proposal; and exercise Option 2 of 4, additional one-year periods, amending Section 6., Term of Agreement, to commence July 1, 2021 and expire June 30, 2022; and

4. WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Parties to issue Amendment Three (3) to the Original Agreement to increase Section 3., Compensation, by $267,275.00, thereby amending the annual not to exceed sum from $600,000.00 to $867,275.00; and

GENERAL SERVICES PROVIDER STANDARD AGREEMENT/Ferguson Enterprises, Inc./Project CC20- 014/Amendment 3

5. NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the covenants, conditions, and promises contained herein and for such other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties are willing to amend the Original Agreement as stated below.

Contract Amendment

Section 3. - COMPENSATION – is amended as follows:

“The District shall pay a total annual amount not to exceed Eight Hundred Sixty- seven Thousand Two Hundred Seventy -five and 00/100 Dollars ($867,275.00) for the services rendered by Service Provider pursuant to this Agreement, subject to the provisions of Section 4.”

Except as amended herein, t he terms and conditions of the O riginal Agreement and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect.

(SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)
GENERAL SERVICES PROVIDER STANDARD AGREEMENT/Ferguson Enterprises, Inc./Project CC20- 014/Amendment 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the A mendment to the Original Agreement to be entered as of the dates written below.

PARTY OF THE FIRST PART PARTY OF THE SECOND PART

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC.

By:_______________________________ By:_______________________________ Debra Jones, Michael Balla,
District Chairman Area Manager

Dated:______________________________ Dated:______________________________

ATTEST

By: ________________________________
Jennifer Thompson,
District Secretary

Dated: ______________________________

VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT APPROVED AS TO STANDARD FORM

By:________________________________ By:________________________________ Lee Brown, Andre de Bortnowsky,
District Risk Manager District Legal Counsel

Dated:__________________________ Dated:__________________________ Attachment B
Municipal Code 2.28.100(6)
Created: 2021-10-12 11:02:47 [EST]
(Supp. No. 48)

2.28.100 Purchases of general services or supplies and equipment with an estimated cost in excess of fifty thousand dollars.
(a) Bidding requirement. The city manager shall solicit bids for supplies and equipment and general services wit h a
n estimated cost in excess of fifty thousand dollars per single transaction or term agreement by followin g t
he formal bid procedure prescribed in this section.
(1) Notice inviting bids. The notice inviting bids shall include a general description of the supplies a nd e
quipment or general services to be purchased, and shall state where bid forms and specifications ma y be
secured, and the final time and place for submitting bids. (A) Published notice. The notice inviting bids shall be published at least one time, ten calendar days before the date of opening of the bids in a newspaper(s) of general circulation, printed an d p
ublished locally. The city manager may also give such additional notice as he/she deems appropriate.
(B) B
idder's list. The city manager shall also solicit sealed bids from responsible prospective suppliers whose names are on the city's bidder's list.
(2) Bid opening procedure. Bidders shall submit sealed bids to the city manager or such department hea d a
s may be identified in the notice inviting bids, and shall identify them as bids on the envelope i n a
ccordance with the notice inviting bids. Invitations for bids shall require a bid opening at a desi gnated pl
ace, date and time when the city clerk, or his or her designee, shall publicly open. (3) Rejection of bids. In its discretion, the city council may reject any and all bids presented, and may re - advertise for bids in the event all bids are rejected.
(4
) Reserved.
(5) No bid/no responsive bid. If no bid, or no responsive bid is received after inviting bids under this section, the city manager may proceed to procure the general services or purchase the supplies a nd e
quipment in the open market.
(6) Award of contract. The city council shall have the authority to award a contract for purchase of supplies and equipment or general services with a cost in excess of fifty thousand dollars. If responsive a nd r
esponsible bids are received, the city council shall make award of the contract to the best value bidder, even if such bidder did not submit the lowest monetary bid. The factors from section 2.28.040 upon which the award was based shall be set forth in writing. (b) Exceptions. The bidding procedures under this section may be dispensed with:
(1) In the event the city council determines the existence of an emergency as defined in subsectio n 2 .28.050(6) and provided such procurement is made in accordance with the applicable provisions of subsection 2.28.060(f);
(2) Where it is determined by the city council that such procurement constitutes a sole source purchase.

The basis upon which this determination is made shall be prepared by the city manager in writing a nd
pr
esented to the city council for approval using the city's sole-source justification form; (3) Where the general services, supplies or equipment are purchased through a cooperative purchasing arrangement pursuant to section 2.28.120; a
nd
(4
) Where supplies and equipment or general services are purchased through competitive or noncompetitive negotiations pursuant to section 2.28.110. (Ord. No. 2381 , § 2, 9-18-18)
Attachment C
Sole Source Form

SOLE SOURCE/BRAND REQUEST
Whena request is made for a non-competitive purchase and the specifications limit the bidding to one source and/or one brand or trade name, the requesting department must complete the following:

VENDOR/COMPANY NAME: _______________________________________________________________

1. Please check one:

SOURCE: Item is available from one source only. Item is one-of-a kind and issold through distributor manufacturer is distributor.

SOLE BRAND: Various sources can supply the specified model and brand, and competitive bids will be solicited for the requested brand only. Meets form, fit and function - nothing else will do.

STANDARDIZATION REQUEST: The City of Victorville ______________________ (Department name) Department requires the item(s) to standardize parts; design; quality; training; etc...

2. What are the unique performance features of the product / brand requested that are not available in any other product / brand? (For services: What unique qualifications’, rights, licenses does this vendor possess?)

3. Why are the unique performance features REQUIRED (not merely preferred), and how would your requirement be inhibited without this service or item? N/A

4. If justification is based on matching and/or interdependent with existing equipment (refer to 1. Standardization Request), list the quantity, manufacturer, brand, and model of the existing equipment and why the matching is required.

I am aware of the City of Victorville’s policy for competitive bidding and the established criteria for sole source/sole brand purchasing. Therefore, I feel confident that this request for sole source/sole brand procurement meets the City of Victorville’s criteria and will withstand an audit or a vendor protest.

Requestor: ________________________________ ______________________________ ___________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
Dept. Director: ____________________________ ______________________________ ___________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
Finance Director: __________________________ ______________________________ ____________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)

Item Number: 14
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

C. Eric Ray, Airport Director

Subject:

Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Southern California Logistics Airport Authority and Santi Rao.

Recommendation:

That Your Honorable Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Board of Directors:
(1) authorize the Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority and Mr. Santi Rao for the purchase of Assessor’s Parcel Number 0459-032-39;
(2) approve Resolution No. SCLAA 22-005 amending the 2021/2022 budget increasing expenditures in Fund 455 by $210,000; and
(3) authorize the Airport Director to execute transactional documents to effectuate the purchase of subject property, including making non substantive modifications to the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

Fiscal Impact:

The Purchase and Sale Agreement (Agreement) presented herein will add a $210,000 unbudgeted expenditure requiring additional expenditure appropriation in Fund 455.

Resolution No. SCLAA 22-005 is presented herein for the purpose of requesting approval of the required budget adjustment. The budget revision is outlined below:

Current FY21/22 Budget
Revenue Expense
455 Fund $0 $0
Revised FY21/22 Budget
Revenue Expense
455 Fund $0 $210,000
2 2
7 8
Background:

Earlier this year, the City of Victorville caused the preparation of a Specific Plan update which covers the Southern California Logistics Airport (SCLA) property and establishes the requisite land use guidelines. The Specific Plan designates the subject property, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 0459-032-39 (the Property), as land that is reserved for the main airport operations area and aviation exclusive uses, including airport logistics terminals, hangars, and aviation support-related industrial uses. The intent of this designation is to provide for the logical development of the SCLA to better accommodate aviation and aviation related facilities, and compatible industrial and commercial uses.

The Property, consisting of approximately 20 acres, is currently the only privately owned parcel located within the secured Airport Operations Area of the airfield and has been owned by Mr. Santi Rao for nearly 32 years. Previous attempts to acquire the Property were made in 2006 and 2013 with an appraisal having been completed in 2013 to establish fair market value. In both instances, the parties were unable to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

Discussion:

This Property is centrally located within the Airport Operations Area making future aeronautical development its highest and best use. Given the unique attributes of the property, staff believes the proposed sale price to be a discount to the property’s intrinsic aeronautical value.

As a function of the HDSI Solar Project, located just north of the airfield, over 270 acres of land were recently purchased via six separate sales transactions. These transactions closed between October 2018 and September 2020, providing reliable comparisons by which to determine fair market value of the subject Property. The average sales price of the six transactions was $11,163 per acre.

In early 2021, staff was approached by Mr. Rao’s realtor in hopes of restarting the sales negotiation. Over the course of nearly a year, staff negotiated a sales price of $10,500 per acre, totaling $210,000 for the entire 20 acre parcel.

Given that opportunities to purchase land on a commercial airport are rare and fortunate occurrences, staff recommends that the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Board of Directors (1) authorize the Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority and Mr. Santi Rao for the purchase of Assessor’s Parcel Number 0459-032-39; and (2) approve Resolution No. SCLAA 22-005 amending the 2021/2022 budget increasing expenditures in Fund 455 by $210,000; and (3) authorize the Airport Director to execute transactional documents to effectuate the purchase of subject property, including making non substantive modifications to the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

Staff remains available for any questions or comments you may have. 2 2
7 8
Attachments: A. Site Map
B. Purchase and Sale Agreement
C. Resolution No. SCLAA 22-005

ATTACHMENT A

SITE MAP

APN #0459-032-39

SITE MAP APN
#0459-032-39

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
AND

SANTI RAO
THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the ___ day of ___________, 2022 (“Effective Date”) by and between the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority ("Buyer"), and Santi Rao, as a single man ("Seller"). Buyer and Seller are sometimes hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and together as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Seller owns in fee simple that certain real property located adjacent to Southern California Logistics Airport, designated as Assessor’s Parcel Number 0459-032-39, in the City of Victorville, California (the “Property”); and

WHEREAS, Seller now desires to sell to Buyer and Buyer desires to purchase from Seller, the Property on the terms and conditions set forth herein; and

AGREEMENT

1. Purchase and Sale. Seller agrees to sell the Property to Buyer and Buyer agrees to purchase the Property from Seller, for the Purchase Price, as defined in Section 2 of this Agreement, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

2. Purchase Price. Buyer shall purchase the Property from Seller and Seller shall sell the Property to Buyer, for a price of Two Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($210,000) (“Purchase Price”).

3. Financing. Buyer shall purchase the Property entirely in cash or cash equivalent.

No financing will be required for Buyer to purchase the Property.

4. Due Diligence Inspections. As used in this Agreement, “Due Diligence Period” shall mean the period commencing on the Opening of Escrow and expiring Ninety (90) days thereafter. During the Due Diligence Period the Buyer, its agents and representatives, shall be entitled to unfettered access to enter onto the Property to perform inspections and tests on the Property (the “Inspections”). After making such Inspections, the Buyer agrees to promptly restore the Property to its condition prior to the Inspections (which obligation shall survive any termination of this Agreement). The Buyer agrees to promptly deliver to the Seller, upon receipt of written request from the Seller, copies of all reports, studies and results of the Inspection obtained or conducted by the Buyer with respect to the Property. The Buyer shall also have the right to approve of the Preliminary Title Report during the Due Diligence Period.

Until the Closing Date, as hereafter defined, the Buyer agrees to keep the Property free from all liens and to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Seller, its officers, directors, agents and employees and their respective successors and assigns from and against all claims, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including, but not limited to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs) incurred, suffered, or claimed against the Seller by reason of any damage to the Property or injury to persons caused by the Buyer and/or its agents, employees or contractors in exercising its rights under this Section 4; provided however, that the Buyer shall not be required to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Seller from, and shall have no liability to the Seller relating to (i) any claims, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney fees and costs) relating to or arising from hazardous materials (including any release or migration thereof) discovered or existing in, on, or adjacent to the Property prior to the time of such Inspections; (ii) provided that the Inspections are performed in the accordance with normal and customary practices in the hazardous materials investigation industry, and that the release or migration of hazardous materials was not caused by the Buyer or its agents, employees or contractors, the existence or migration of any hazardous materials; or (iii) any injury, property damage or liability relating to the negligence of the Seller.

5. Escrow. The Seller and the Buyer agree to establish an escrow for the purchase and sale of the Property at First American Title Insurance Company (the “Escrow Agent”), whose address is 12530 Hesperia Road, Suite 218, Victorville, CA 92395, Attention: Debbie Taylor – Escrow Officer. The Parties agree that upon mutual written agreement of both Parties the Escrow Agent may be changed from time to time. The escrow shall be opened no later than ten (10) days after the Seller has executed this Agreement (the “Opening of Escrow”). This Agreement shall constitute the joint escrow instructions between the Seller and the Buyer, and a duplicate original of this Agreement shall be delivered to the Escrow Agent upon the opening of the escrow.

5.1 The Seller and Buyer shall provide and execute such additional escrow instructions consistent with this Agreement as shall be necessary. The Escrow Agent hereby is empowered to act under this Agreement, and, upon indicating its acceptance of this Section in writing, delivered to the Seller and the Buyer, within three (3) calendar days after the establishment of the escrow, shall carry out its duties as the Escrow Agent hereunder.

5.2 The Seller and the Buyer shall deliver to the Escrow Agent all documents necessary for the conveyance of title to the Property, to the extent provided in this Agreement, in conformity with, within the times, and in the manner provided in this Agreement.

5.3 The Buyer shall pay one half of any escrow fees related to the transfer of the Property from the Seller to the Buyer, promptly after the Escrow Agent has notified the Buyer of the amount of such fees, charges and costs, but in any event, prior to closing of escrow. The Seller shall pay one half of any escrow fees and any State, County or City documentary transfer taxes.

5.4 The Escrow Agent shall cause a Preliminary Title Report to be prepared and issued by First American Title Insurance Company and shall promptly provide the Seller and the Buyer with copies thereof along with legible copies of all reported title exceptions. The Seller shall pay for that portion of the title insurance premiums attributable to a CLTA standard form policy of title insurance in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. The Buyer shall pay for all other premiums for title insurance coverage or special endorsements. Title shall be conveyed subject only to those matters set forth in the Preliminary Title Report which are approved by the Buyer during the Due Diligence Period. The Seller shall be responsible for removing, on or prior to Close of Escrow, any deeds of trust, monetary encumbrances and liens of record, as well as all matters which are disapproved by the Buyer which can be reasonably removed by the Seller.

5.5 All funds received in escrow shall be deposited by the Escrow Agent in an insured account with any state or national bank doing business in the State of California, and such funds may be combined with other escrow funds of the Escrow Agent. Such funds shall draw the highest reasonable rate of interest and such interest shall accrue to the party to this Agreement who shall have made the deposit thereof with the Escrow Agent.

5.6 All communications from the Escrow Agent to the Seller or the Buyer shall be directed to the respective parties at the addresses set forth in Section 11 of this Agreement for notices, demands and communications between the Seller and the Buyer.

6. Title and Title Insurance. Seller shall convey by grant deed, in substantially the same form as that attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (“Grant Deed”), good and marketable fee simple title to the Property to Buyer, within ten (10) days after the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (the “Closing” or “Closing Date”), free of any monetary encumbrances affecting the condition of title except as otherwise permitted in Section 7 below. A condition to the Closing is Buyer’s ability to secure, at Seller’s cost, an Owner's CLTA Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance (“Policy”) for the Property, showing title vested in Buyer in the condition required by this Agreement. The Policy amount shall equal the purchase price of the Property. The Policy shall be issued by First American Title Company or another title insurance company mutually acceptable to the Parties ("Title Company").

7. Conditions of Purchase. Buyer's obligation to perform under this Agreement and to purchase the Property shall be subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in Section 4 above as well as all the provisions of this Section 7, which all are for Buyer's benefit only. In the event any of the said conditions are not satisfied within the specified time limit(s), Buyer may, at its sole option and discretion, either waive such conditions or terminate this Agreement.

In the event that Buyer, within ten (10) business days following receipt of the Preliminary Report, objects in writing to any monetary exceptions or exceptions which have a material effect on the use and/or value of the Property, which exceptions are disclosed therein, Seller shall be obligated to cause the removal of said exceptions on or before the Closing. In the event Seller agrees to but is unable to cause any such title discrepancy to be removed on or before the Closing, Buyer shall, as its exclusive remedy, have the right to terminate this Agreement. Any termination authorized by this section shall be effected via a written notice from Buyer to Seller, specifying the date of termination and the reasons therefor.

Title to the Property shall be in the condition required by this Agreement as of the Closing. At Closing, the Policy issued shall show as exceptions only the following: (i) the standard printed exceptions set forth in the title policy; (ii) general and special real property taxes and assessments, if any, for the current fiscal year, a lien not yet due and payable; and (iii) recorded easements.

8. Closing. On or before the Closing, Buyer and Seller shall record the Grant Deed and any other instruments required to be recorded and shall deliver the funds and documents to which they shall be respectively entitled, provided that the Title Company has stated that it shall be in a position to and will issue and deliver, upon the filing of the Grant Deed, the title insurance required hereunder.

8.1 Additional Documents. Buyer and Seller shall execute such additional documents as may be reasonably required to effectuate the Closing, but in no event shall said additional documents increase the rights of one party against the other party hereto or modify the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

8.2 Possession. Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to Buyer immediately following the Closing.

8.3 Delivery of Documents and Funds. On the Closing Date, Seller shall deliver the Grant Deed and any additional documents required from Seller to effectuate transfer of title of the Property to Buyer, and, Buyer shall deliver the Purchase Price and any additional funds required for Closing.

8.4 Prorations. Current real property taxes, any assessments, fees, utilities, prepaid service contracts, and any other costs or fees necessary for the Closing shall be prorated as of the Closing Date on the basis of a thirty (30) day calendar month.

9. Seller’s Representations and Warranties. Seller hereby makes the following representations, warranties, and acknowledgments, and agrees that such representations, warranties and acknowledgments shall be true as of the Closing Date and shall survive the Closing for a period of one (1) year.

9.1 Seller, and the person executing this Agreement on behalf of Seller, has the full right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to convey title to the Property to Buyer, and to take all actions required of it by the terms of this Agreement.

9.2 All the documents executed by Seller which are to be delivered to Buyer at or before the Closing Date will be duly authorized, executed and delivered by Seller and will be legal, valid and binding obligations of Seller enforceable against Seller in accordance with their respective terms (except to the extent that such enforcement may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium and other principals relating to or limiting the rights of contracting parties generally) and will not violate any provisions of any agreement to which Seller is a party or to which it is subject.

9.3 Seller is not a foreign person under Section 1445 Internal Revenue Code.

9.4 Seller is the lawful fee simple owner of the Property and all improvements developed thereupon, which, as of the Closing Date, will be free and clear of all liens, security agreements, and all other monetary encumbrances, claims, demands, and charges of every kind and nature whatsoever.

9.5 Prior to the Closing or the termination of this Agreement by Buyer in accordance with the terms herein, Seller shall not execute any option, lease, escrow instructions, sale contracts, or other agreements or instruments giving any other party any right of ownership, possession, or use of the Property or any part thereof, or further encumber the Property or any part thereof.

9.6 Seller makes no guarantees or warranties with respect to any environmental conditions regarding the subject property and has no actual knowledge of the existence of (i) any underground tanks or of any toxic substances or hazardous materials or wastes (as those terms are defined under any federal, state or local laws or regulations) located on or about the Property, or (ii) any reports or studies evaluating or disclosing the existence of any such tanks, substances or materials on or about the Property; nor has Seller ever caused or permitted any hazardous materials to be placed, held, located or disposed of on, under or at the Property.

9.7 Seller has no actual knowledge of any material defects in the Property.

9.8 This Agreement has been duly executed by Seller and constitutes the valid and binding agreement of Seller enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms.

9.9 Until the Closing Date, Seller shall maintain the Property and any improvements, in the same general condition as exists as of the Effective Date. Seller shall deliver the Property reasonably clean and free of all personal belongings and debris.

10. Buyer’s Representations and Warranties. Buyer hereby makes the following representations, warranties and acknowledgments, and agrees that such representations, warranties and acknowledgments shall be true as of the Closing Date and shall survive the Closing for a period of one (1) year.

10.1 Buyer, and the person executing this Agreement on behalf of Buyer, has the full right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement, to purchase the Property from Seller and to take all actions required of it by the terms of this Agreement.

10.2 All the documents executed by Buyer which are to be delivered to Seller at the Closing will be duly authorized, executed, and delivered by Buyer and will be legal, valid, and binding obligations of Buyer enforceable against Buyer in accordance with their respective terms (except to the extent that such enforcement may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium and other principals relating to or limiting the rights of contracting parties generally), and will not violate any provisions of any agreement to which Buyer is a party or to which it is subject.

10.3 This Agreement has been duly executed by Buyer and constitutes the valid and binding agreement of Buyer enforceable against Buyer in accordance with its terms.

11. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, commercial overnight courier with written verification of receipt or by telecopy. A notice shall be deemed given: (a) when delivered by personal delivery (as evidenced by the receipt); (b) three (3) days after deposit in the mail if sent by registered or certified mail; (c) three (3) days after having been sent by commercial overnight courier as evidenced by the written verification of receipt; or (d) on the date of confirmation if telecopied. Notices shall be addressed as set forth below, but any addressee may change its address by written notice in accordance herewith.

Buyer: Southern California Logistics Airport Authority 18374 Phantom W West
Victorville, CA 92394
Attn:

C. Eric Ray, Airport Director

With a copy to: Green, de Bortnowsky , LLP
30077 Agoura Court, Suite 210
Agoura Hills, CA 91301
Attn:

Andre de Bortnowsky, City Attorney

Seller: Santi Rao
c/o Rigel Capital
18270 Siskiyou Road, Suite 1
Apple Valley, CA 92307
Attn:

Tony Scafidi

12. Brokers and Agents. Buyer has not retained or engaged a broker with respect to this sale. Seller shall be fully responsible to pay any Broker’s commission or finder’s fees.

13. General Provisions.

13.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein, and supersedes any prior agreement and understanding about the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may only be modified or amended by a written instrument executed by the Parties.

13.2 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

13.3 Headings. The subject headings of the sections and paragraphs of this Agreement are included for purposes of convenience only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions.

13.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

13.5 Successors and Assigns. Each covenant and condition contained in this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding on the parties to this Agreement and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors and assigns.

13.6 Attorneys’ Fees; Costs of Litigation. If any legal action or any other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default, or misrepresentation in connection with any of the provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled, including the fees and costs incurred in enforcing any judgment which may be obtained in said action.

13.7 Remedies for Default. Failure by a party to perform any term, condition or covenant required of the party under this Agreement shall constitute a “default” of the offending party under this Agreement. In the event that a default remains uncured for more than ten (10) days following receipt of written notice of default from the other party, a "breach" shall be deemed to have occurred. Any failure or delay by a party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any rights or remedies associated with a default.

13.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

13.9 Non-Liability of Officials and Employees of Buyer and Seller. No member, official or employee of the Buyer or Seller shall be personally liable to the other party or any of their successors-in-interest, in the event of any default or breach by either party or for any amount which may become due to either party or their successors, or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.

13.10 Interpretation. As used in this Agreement, masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others where and when the context so dictates. The word “including” shall be construed as if followed by the words “without limitation.” This Agreement shall be interpreted as though prepared jointly by the Parties.

13.11 Risk of Loss. Risk of loss to the Property shall be borne by Seller until possession of the Property has been delivered to Buyer. If improvements on the Property are destroyed or materially damaged prior to transfer of title through no fault of Buyer, Seller may cause the immediate repair of said improvements unless Buyer, in its sole discretion, elects in writing to waive such Seller requirements and elects to proceed with the purchase of the Property. Buyer shall notify Seller whether Buyer wishes to proceed with the Property purchase within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice from Seller of such circumstances. In the event that Seller elects not to repair the damaged or destroyed improvements and Buyer declines to complete the Property purchase, Seller shall be relieved of the obligation to sell the damaged or destroyed Property to Buyer as provided herein and the Parties’ obligations under this Agreement shall terminate with respect to the damaged or destroyed Property. In the event Property repairs are made, Buyer shall be obligated to close escrow when the repairs are completed as evidenced by the sign-off of building permits, Certificates of Occupancy or other similar applicable governmental instruments.

[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE.]
SELLER:

Santi Rao
_________________________________
Santi Rao, a single man
BUYER:

Southern California Logistics Airport
Authority
_________________________________
C. Eric Ray, Airport Director
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jennifer Thompson, Authority Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
Andre de Bortnowsky, Authority Legal
Counsel
EXHIBIT “A”

GRANT DEED

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

Southern California Logistics Airport Authority

Space Above this Line Reserved for Use by Recorder

GRANT DEED
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SANTI RAO, a single man ("Grantor"), hereby grants to the SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY, all of Grantor's right, title and interest in that real property (“Property”) described as Assessor’s Parcel Number 0459-032-39, in the City of Victorville, California.

The Property is conveyed subject to the Purchase and Sale Agreement entered into between the Grantor and the Grantee, dated ("Agreement"). The provisions of the Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference and shall be deemed to be a part hereof as if set forth at length herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Grant Deed on this _____ day of ______________, _______.

GRANTOR:

SANTI RAO

By: _____________________________

2 4
4 2

ATTACHMENT C
RESOLUTION NO.

SCLAA 22-005
2 4
4 2
RESOLUTION NO. SCLA 22-005

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY AMENDING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority (“SCLAA”) did heretofore submit to the Board of Directors an estimate of the expenditures and revenues of the SCLAA, together with a proposed budget for the fiscal year 2021-22; and
WHEREAS, copies of said budget were prepared and distributed to the SCLAA Board of Directors, approved by the SCLAA Board of Directors prior to June 30, 2021, and have been available for the inspection by the public in the office of the Authority Secretary of the SCLAA; and
WHEREAS, after preparation of the budget, a need to amend the budget is being recommended to the SCLAA Board of Directors for approval; and WHEREAS, the Executive Director or his designee will provide all necessary justification for the budget amendment as an attachment to this resolution or in the associated SCLAA agenda report.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the annual budget for the fiscal year 2021-22 for the SCLAA be hereby amended to reflect a change in the amounts and associated accounts listed below and as described in the corresponding Agenda Item.

Account Amount Adjusted
4551192-55010-95102
(AIRPORT – RAO LAND PURCHASE)
($210,000)

SECTION 2. That copies of such amended budget, certified by the Authority Secretary, shall be filed with the auditors of the SCLAA and in the office of the Authority Secretary for public inspection and certified copies thereof shall be made available for use by City departments, offices and subsidiary districts of the City.

Item Number: 15
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

John Mendiola, Finance Director / City Treasurer

Subject:

Purchase of Fleet Vehicles Under Project CC22-060 Purchase of New Vehicles Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council: 1) approve the purchase of fleet vehicles from Project CC22-060 vehicle list, through several procurement methods such as cooperative purchasing programs, lead agency piggyback programs, and availability of suitable dealer lot inventory; and 2) authorize the City Manager to execute any documents necessary for such purchases.

Fiscal Impact:

All vehicle purchases have been budgeted for in the FY 2021-2022 approved budget in the amount of $1,671,000 and are reflected in various City accounts as listed below. In addition to the budgeted amount, a 10% contingency amount of $167,100 is being requested due to the increased vehicle pricing occurring nationwide. Such contingency will be absorbed as needed through existing department budgets. As such, no additional appropriation is needed at this time and the total fiscal impact of this approval is $1,838,100.

Department Number of
Vehicles Budgeted
Vehicle Budget
Amount
Account Code(s)
Animal Control One (1) $80,000 1005020-55045-45002
Code Enforcement Five (5) $180,000 1054030-55045-40009
Facilities One (1) $60,000 1006050-55045-81000
Finance One (1) $35,000 1001500-55045-97066
IT One (1) $22,000 1001510-55045-36030
Parks Two (2) $150,000 1005600-55040-70712
1056000-55040-70711
2 4
7 4
Sanitation One (1) $80,000 4250700-55045-70705
2025060-55045-70705
2205004-55045-70705
Solid Waste Two (2) $102,000 4260400-55045-70709
4260400-55045-70710
Traffic Signal One (1) $78,000 2004501-55040-62057
2504503-55040-62057
Water Engineering Two (2) $84,000 4104500-55045-74447
4104500-55045-74448
Water Production Three (3) $95,000 4100500-55045-74346
4100525-55045-74439
4100500-55040-74306
Water Field Five (5) $580,000 4100535-55045-74426
4100535-55040-74400
4100535-55040-74441
4100535-55045-74298
Water Telemetric One (1) $75,000 4100505-55040-74348
Water Meter One (1) $50,000 4100530-55040-74278
$100,000 for a Water Production vehicle was previously budgeted for in the 2020- 21 budget.

Background:

In December of 2021, the City's Fleet Division along with the Finance Purchasing Division solicited a bid package for 26 Fleet Vehicles. During the procurement process, several dealers called staff to inform them they could not bid because the factory was not taking government fleet orders due to material shortages and computer chip sourcing issues, thus the dealers were not receiving any allocations from the factory. No bids were received by the due date of January 12, 2022. Purchasing staff followed up with calls to some of our local dealers and they stated that due to inventory and allocation issues, they are unable to guarantee any orders.

Discussion:

The shortage of vehicles has resulted in limited availability of inventory nationwide and has driven the price of new and used vehicles to an all-time high. The City's municipal code 2.28.100(a)(5) “Purchases of general supplies and equipment with an estimated cost in excess of fifty thousand dollars”, stipulates if no bid or no responsive bid is received after inviting bids under this section, the City Manager may proceed to procure the equipment in the open market.

Per the City's Municipal Code 2.28.120 “Purchasing of supplies and equipment through cooperative purchasing arrangements” the City may utilize various cooperative purchasing programs, to take advantage of volume pricing, entered into by any local, state, or federal governmental agencies, if the underlying purchase was made using quotation or bid procedures at least as restrictive as the City's. The State of California Contract administered by the Department of General Services is deemed by the Purchasing Division to be in conformance with the City's quotation or bid procedures to 2 4
7 4
permit reasonable competition, provided supplies and equipment purchased are the same and offered at the same price as the supplies and equipment subject to the agreement or program. The State of California and other nationwide cooperative programs offer a multitude of cooperatively contracted vehicles to government entities that cannot be procured from local dealers.

The City's purchasing staff has contacted numerous government cooperative purchasing programs for inventory updates, along with our local dealers, and they all have stated, the factories could be releasing limited quantities later this month on a first-come, first-serve basis. City staff would like to take advantage of this recent update to ensure future deliveries of vehicles from our list. City staff will conduct due diligence cost analysis to ensure the City does not overpay for vehicles on the open market and will utilize the cooperative purchasing programs as available. Each vehicle has been budgeted across various City departments and such budget will be utilized for the purchases. The City is looking to reserve vehicles as they become available with the intent of securing the bookings with purchase orders for confirmed build and delivery dates. Council's approval to procure fleet vehicles will enable the City to secure guaranteed delivery dates of much needed vehicles and equipment.

Staff is available for any questions Council may have.

Attachments: A. Project CC22-060 New Vehicle Purchase list FY 22 LIST OF VEHICLE PURCHASE
DEPT. VEHICLE# VEHICLE TYPE QTY.

AC #1 350/3500 SRW 4X4 EXT CAB/CHASSIS XL –

TRIM WITH DEERSKIN ANIMAL CAPTURE
BODY, 11,400 GVWR
1 CODE/ENF #2 LIGHT DUTY 4X4 CREW CAB PICK-UP TRUCK 5
FACILITIES #3 350/3500 SRW 4X4 CREW CAB, UTILITY BODY

WITH OVERHEAD MATERIAL RACK
1 FINANCE #4 4X4 MID-SIZE SUV SEATING FOR 7 – 6,160
GVWR
1 IT #5 4X4 SUBCOMPACT SUV SEATING FOR 5 –
3,300 VCW
1 PARKS #6 250/2500 SRW 4X2 CREW CAB PICK-UP WITH
8’BED
1 PARKS #7 350/3500 DRW 4X2 CREW CAB, 10’

CONTRACTOR BODY WITH OVERHEAD

MATERIAL RACK
1 STORM DRAIN #8 350/3500 DRW 4X4 CREW CAB, 9’

CONTRACTOR BODY WITH OVERHEAD

MATERIAL RACK
1 SOLID WASTE #9 250/2500 SRW 4X4 CREW CAB PICKUP WITH 8’BED
2 TRAFFIC
ENGR
#10 150/1500 SRW 4X4 CREW CAB PICKUP WITH

5.5’ BED
1 PRODUCTION #11 4X4 FULL SIZE SUV SEATING FOR 8 – 7,200 GVWR
1 METER #12 150/1500 SRW 4X4 CREW CAB PICKUP WITH

5.5 BED
1 FIELD #13 250/2500 SRW 4X4 CREW CAB PICKUP WITH
8’ BED
1 PRODUCTION #14 250/2500 SRW 4X4 CREW CAB PICKUP WITH
8’BED
1 TELEMTRY #15 350/3500 DRW 4X4 EXTRA CAB, 11’ UTILITY

SERVICE BODY WITH OVERHEAD MATERIAL
RACK
1 FIELD #16 450/4500 DRW 4X2 EXTENDED CAB, 169”
WB/84” CA, WITH 9’ CUSTOM BODY
1 FIELD
#17 550/5500 DRW 4X2 REG. CAB, 169” WB/84” CA,
WITH 12’ DUMP BODY
2 FIELD
#18 550/5500 DRW 4X2 REG. CAB, 205” WB/120”
CA, WITH 12’ CUSTOM BODY
1 WATER/ENGR
#19 AWD SMALL SUV SEATING FOR 5 SLE TRIM
3,622VCW
2 Item Number: 16
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Brian Gengler, City Engineer

Subject:

Approval for Purchase of Leotek LED Safety Lights
Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council approve the purchase of 108 Leotek LED safety lights from South Coast Lighting & Design in the amount of $64,480.05.

Fiscal Impact:

This purchase will result in a fiscal impact of $64,480.05. An additional appropriation is not required. There are sufficient funds in the budget to cover the planned expense. The budget account numbers, and fund sources are shown below.

Budget Account Number:
2004501-55315-62059 - Street Light Fund - $48,750.00
2504503-55315-62059 - Measure I Fund - $16,250.00
Background:

The City of Victorville operates and maintains a total of 96 intersections which are controlled by traffic signals. Typically, an intersection has a safety light on a traffic signal pole at each corner which provides lighting for both pedestrians and motorists. The safety lights which illuminate the intersection are separate from the red, yellow, and green traffic signal lights which control vehicles moving through the intersection.

The safety lights will eventually need to be replaced at all 96 intersections. The first phase will include replacing safety lights at 27 intersections. The existing safety lights are 250- watt HPS (High Pressure Sodium) and will be replaced with new Leotek LED safety lights.

Over time this will result in saving electricity and less maintenance. The expected life for the LED safety lights is seven to ten years compared to one to two years for the HPS safety lights. All replacements will be conducted by the City’s Traffic Maintenance division.
2 4
6 2
Discussion:

Staff obtained three quotations for the Leotek LED safety lights. Below is a breakdown of the quotations received.

South Coast Lighting & Design $64,480.05
Consolidated Electrical (CED) $73,406.25
McCain Inc. $78,474.22
Staff has reviewed all three quotations and determined that South Coast Lighting provided the lowest responsible bid for a total of $64,480.05. Staff has confirmed that the dollar amount is reasonable, and the safety lights meet the City’s requirements. Staff has obtained an updated quotation dated March 4, 2022, confirming that the pricing on the original quotation remains valid.

Staff recommends that the Honorable City Council approve the purchase of 108 Leotek LED safety lights from South Coast Lighting & Design, in the amount of $64,480.05.

Staff remains available for any questions that the City Council may have.

Attachments: A. Quotations

ATTACHMENT A

Item Number: 17
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Brian Gengler, City Engineer

Subject:

Vacation of a Public Utility Easement on Property Located on Village Drive, near Culebra Road, Tract Map No. 4594, Lot Nos. 2 and 3.

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council adopt the attached Resolution No. 22-023 to vacate a public utility easement on Tract Map No. 4594, Lot Nos. 2 and 3.

Fiscal Impact:

The recommended action will not result in a fiscal impact. No City expenses will be incurred.

Background:

A proposed development for a Dollar General Store will be located on Village Drive, near Culebra Road. Please refer to Attachment B, a location map. The property is currently vacant and located on Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 0395-122-08, and -09. The development, Case No. ADMN21-00073, was entitled, has been in plan check and is close to obtaining permits for construction from the City. A lot line adjustment and merger of lots is proposed in relation to the proposed development.

Discussion:

There is a public utility easement (PUE) on the parcels to be developed that needs to be vacated. The development will be within Lots 2 and 3 of Tract Map No. 4594, which was recorded in 1957. The PUE is located where a new building is proposed.

The California Streets and Highways Code (the Code), provides the authority and the procedure for a City to vacate public streets, highways and service easements in Sections 8300 and following. The vacation of the PUE over the subject property can be accomplished by a summary vacation as provided by Sections 8330 through 8336 of the Code. One of the requirements, in Section 8333 (c) of the Code, is that “the easement 2 4
7 2
has been superseded by relocation, or determined to be excess by the easement holder, and there are no other public facilities located within the easement”. The City has received letters from all the public utility companies in the City stating that these companies do not have facilities within the PUE and do not need the PUE which satisfies this requirement.

Because there was a separate document, recorded in 1957, granting the use of the PUE to the California Power Company, Southern California Edison (SCE), the successor, will need to quit claim its interest in this PUE. The quit claim will be recorded after the vacation of the PUE has been approved. This intent to quit claim has been included in a letter from SCE. All the utility company letters are on file with the City.

A resolution must be adopted by the City Council and recorded to vacate the PUE. Please refer to Attachment A, Resolution No. 22-023, with the necessary findings and information to authorize the vacation of the PUE. Attachment C, Tract Map No. 4594, is also attached as a supporting document to accompany the resolution.

Staff recommends that the Honorable City Council adopt the attached Resolution No. 22- 023 to vacate a public utility easement on Tract Map No. 4594, Lot Nos. 2 and 3.

Staff is available for any questions that City Council may have.

Attachments: A. Resolution No. 22-023
B. Location Map
C. Tract Map

Attachment A
Resolution No. 22-023
RESOLUTION NO. 22-023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

VICTORVILLE, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY

VACATION (ABANDONMENT) OF PORTIONS OF A PUBLIC
UTILITY EASEMENT RESERVED IN TRACT NO. 4594 RECORDED
IN BOOK 70 OF MAPS, PAGES 61 THROUGH 65, OFFICIAL

RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
WHEREAS, upon the request of David Church, manager of NNN Retail Developm ent California, LLC, proceedings under Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 4 of the California Streets and Highways Code have been conducted for the summary vacation and abandonment of a portion of the public utility easements reserved and created by Tract No. 4594 recorded in Book 70 of Maps, Pages 61 through 65, Official Records of San Bernardino County (the “Tract Map”); and

WHEREAS, the portions of the public utility easements requested to be vacated and abandoned (the “Abandoned PUE Areas”) are legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and are depicted on Exhibit “B” attached hereto; and

WHEREAS, Section 8333 of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes the City Council to summarily vacate a public service /public utility easement when it has been determined to be excess by the easement holder (s), and there are no other public facilities within the easement; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has noticed the public and conducted a hearing according to Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 4 of the California Streets and Highways Code regarding the vacation and abandonment of the Abandoned PUE Areas; and

WHEREAS, based on the correspondence and other materials submitted by David Church on behalf of the public utilities , the Abandoned PUE Areas are not needed for public utility purposes and there are no utilities or public improvements located within the portion to be vacated; and

WHEREAS, the summary vacation/abandonment of the Abandon ed PUE Areas is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15305.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals

That the Recitals set forth above are true and correct, and together with the definitions contained therein are hereby incorporated into and made an operative part of this Resolution.

Section 2. PUE Areas to be Abandoned

That the Abandoned PUE Areas are those legally described on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” attached hereto.

Section 3. No Existing Utilities in Abandoned PUE Areas

That as of the date of this Resolution, there are no utilities or other public improvements located within the Abandoned PUE Areas.

Section 4. Abandoned PUE Areas Unnecessary for Public Utility Purposes

That based on the evidence submitted, the Abandoned PUE Areas are excess and unnecessary for the prospective use of said public utility companies.

Section 5. No Adverse Effect based on Utility Company Responses

That based on responses from utility companies providing service to the affected real property, the vacation and abandonment of the Abandoned PUE Areas will not adversely affect the interests of said utility companies.

Section 6. PUE Areas Ordered Vacated and Abandoned

That as of the date of recordation of this Resolution, the Abandoned PUE Areas, as the same are legally described on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” attached hereto, are vacated and abandoned; provided, however, that this Resolution shall not vacate or abandon any other public utility easements reserved or created by the Tract Map , other than the Abandoned PUE Areas.

Section 7. Effective Date

That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Section 8. Resolution Certification

That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

Section 9. Recordation of Certified Copy of Resolution by City Clerk

That the City Clerk of the City of Victorville shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be recorded in the Official Records of San Bernardino County Recorder.

P:\APPS\WPDATA\VVCA\0007 - ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS\ABANDONED PUE\100.2-PROPOSED RESOLUTION FR NNN 03.01.22 N.DOCX Exhibit “A”

Legal Description of Abandoned PUE Areas

[see attached]

Exhibit “B”

Depiction of Abandoned PUE Areas

[see attached]

Attachment B
Location Map
Location Map

Attachment C
Tract Map

Item Number: 18
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: March 15, 2022
Submitted By:

Brian Gengler, City Engineer
Scott Webb, City Planner
Tara L. Taguchi, Deputy City Attorney
Subject:

Wellness Center Project - Award of Phase 1 Construction Contract Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council:

1. Approve Resolution No. 22-025, authorizing the waiver of bidding requirements and use of cooperative purchasing construction agreements procured through Sourcewell for the Wellness Center project; and

2. Award a construction contract to Angeles Contractor Inc. for an initial first phase of construction in the amount of $4,827,947.76 for the Wellness Center project.

Fiscal Impact:

This action will result in a fiscal impact of $4,827,947.76. This contract and most of the expected capital expense are being funded by Homekey Round 2 funds that have been awarded to this project. There are sufficient funds available in the Homekey budget to cover the capital expenses for this initial contract and others to follow. The City has additional funds to support the cost of the entire project after the Homekey funds have been expended, through other sources such as HHAP, PLHA, CDBG, Measure P and ARPA. Please refer to the budget account number and available budget shown below:

Account Founding Source Amount
2700011-52300-97063 Homekey $28,004,058
On March 3, 2022, the City received the Standard Agreement from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to memorialize the Homekey Round 2 grant award. As the Standard Agreement has not been fully executed, any award of contract that contemplates the use of Homekey funding should be viewed 2 4
8 4
as “at-risk” in that the City would be responsible for coving the cost of any work completed using an alternate funding source if the Standard Agreement is not finalized. However, as of the date of this report, staff is reviewing the documentation and expects the Standard Agreement will be finalized, although the date of final execution remains unknown.

Background:

Over the past year, City staff has been pursuing the development of a navigation center campus, called the “Wellness Center,” to be located at 16902 First Street in accordance with City Council direction at the August 18, 2020 meeting to continue with the land use entitlement process and securing of funding for the project. Combining a low-barrier emergency shelter, recuperative care facility, medical clinic, interim housing, and wraparound support services, the Wellness Center Campus will be the first facility of its kind in San Bernardino County.

On February 16, 2021, the City Council approved a Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement with CMC Architects and Engineers (CMC) to complete the construction documents for the Wellness Center Campus in the amount of $416,550. This initial agreement was funded by Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant funds.

On September 29, 2021, the City Council authorized staff to proceed with the Homekey Round 2 grant application to assist in funding the construction and operation of the Wellness Center. Resolution No. 21-101 authorized the City Manager to execute documents to apply for and participate in the Homekey Program.

On December 8, 2021 the Planning Commission approved the entitlements for the Wellness Center project, which included approval of a Site Plan and Mitigated Negative Declaration.

On December 15, 2021, the City was notified by HCD of an award in the amount of $28,004,058 under Homekey Round 2 for the Wellness Center project, of which $23,612,058 has been awarded to fund capital construction costs and $4,392,000 for operational expenses.

On January 18, 2022, City Council approved an additional appropriation of funds, as noted above, and increased the not to exceed amount of the agreement with CMC for the Wellness Center Project to $814,172.80.

Discussion:

The Homekey program is designed to rapidly expand housing for homeless within the State. Starting from the December 15, 2021 date of award, Homekey Round 2 requires Victorville to expend capital funds within eight months, complete construction within 12 months with occupancy required within the 90 days following construction completion.

These milestones are rigid, unless an extension of time is authorized by HCD based on circumstances outside of the awardee’s control, such as supply chain delays.

Given the short period of time allowed to construct the Wellness Center, construction of the project needs to commence immediately. To accommodate the expedited project 2 4
8 4
schedule, staff is recommending waving the traditional bidding process by procuring the general contractor through Sourcewell’s cooperative purchasing construction agreement.

Secondly, the project plans will not be 100% complete until the end of April 2022; therefore, a phased approach to awarding the contracts is warranted, which will allow a Phase 1 for earthwork and main utility line installations to occur, while the remaining construction plans and contracts are finalized.

Construction Agreement Procurement Procedures
Bidding Procedures and Exemptions. Article IV of Chapter 2.28 of the Victorville Municipal Code (“VMC”) sets forth various advertising and competitive bidding procedures the City must use when procuring construction of public works projects. The Wellness Center Project qualifies as a public works project because it will be constructed, owned, and operated by the City.

The City utilizes these competitive bidding procedures not only to obtain the best value for the City and ensure healthy competition, but also to comply with State law. However, preparing a bid package (including bid forms, plans, and specifications), advertising for bids, accepting and reviewing timely submitted sealed bids, and then awarding a contract for a public works project is a time-consuming administrative process, which usually takes at least six months to complete.

Both State statutes and case law recognize that strict adherence to competitive bidding requirements is not always required, and in appropriate situations can be waived if the existence of certain facts and circumstances (e.g., emergencies or other specific situations) can be found by the public agency’s governing body.

Section 2.28.230 of the VMC embodies the recognized statutory and judicial exemptions to competitive bidding on public works projects and provides specific guidelines to be followed prior to allowing the City’s normal bidding processes to be modified/waived.

These guidelines include: reviewing and considering the facts of the Project at issue; making findings that one or more of seven listed circumstances exist; preparing a resolution which sets forth the facts and circumstances justifying the waiver/modification of the bidding requirements; and adopting such resolution by a four-fifths vote. The adopted resolution must also specify how the procurement of the Project is to proceed.

Reasons the Project Qualifies for a Bidding Exemption. The Project implicates in whole or in part three of the seven justifying circumstances listed in subdivisions (1)-(7) of VMC Section 2.28.230(a).

Given the tight timing restrictions on both the commitment of funds and the actual commencement of construction on projects funded by the Homekey program, the City Council can find that if the regular bidding procedures were observed, the completion of the work on the Project would be significantly delayed as specified in VMC §

2.28.230(a)(4).
2 4
8 4
Further, the City Council can also find that an emergency exists as specified in VMC §2.28.230(a)(5) and the attached resolution, given:
the lack of affordable housing Statewide;
the high number of persons experiencing homelessness in the City; the impact of recent outbreaks within congregate homeless shelters on the City’s ability to provide services to Victorville’s homeless population; the lingering threat of recurring COVID 19 infections, and the City’s inability to adequately mitigate the threats to the public health, safety, and welfare these circumstances have created without immediately commencing construction of the Project.

Finally, as explained in further detail below, because City Staff has selected a Cooperative Purchasing arrangement to procure construction of the Project, the City Council can also find that there would be no competitive advantage to requiring bidding on this Project (as set forth in VMC § 2.28.230(a)(3)), because Sourcewell has already engaged in a competitive solicitation for the required work to select Angeles Contractor, Inc.

Cooperative Purchasing through Sourcewell
Under specified situations, VMC Section 2.28.120 permits the City Manager to make purchases of supplies and equipment without utilizing competitive bidding procedures if such purchases are based on an agreement or cooperative purchasing program entered into by any local, state or federal governmental agency and the City, provided the underlying purchase was made using quotation or bid procedures at least as restrictive as the City's. Over past few years, the City and the SCLAA have made a number of these types of procurements using various cooperative purchasing programs, including the one provided by Sourcewell (formerly NJPA). The City has been a member of Sourcewell for over five years.

As further detailed in the ezICQ Executive Summary (Attachment C), Sourcewell is a government agency that connects public entity buyers with suppliers including general and trade-specific contractors for the purchasing of construction services. Sourcewell construction contracts, called ezIQC, are competitively-bid Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts awarded to contractors to accomplish the repair, alteration, modernization, and rehabilitation of infrastructure and buildings.

Although Cooperative Purchasing under VMC Section 2.28.120 cannot ordinarily be used to procure public works construction projects, City Staff is recommending it be used for this Project, given the funding, timing, and emergency situations faced by the City. In addition, after reviewing the documentation provided by Sourcewell, City Staff believes the public works project bidding procedure utilized was competitive and comparable to the standard process used by the City for public works construction projects. 2 4
8 4
Resolution No. 22-025 (Attachment A) sets forth the facts and circumstance supporting why the Project qualifies for an exemption from competitive bidding and asks the City Council to approve the waiver of the usual bidding requirements in favor of using Cooperative Purchasing through Sourcewell. Passage of Resolution No. 22-025 requires a four-fifths vote.

Staff also recommends that the City Council approve the initial ezIQC Sourcewell construction contract/Work Order with Angeles Contractor, Inc. (“ACI”) to complete the earthwork and main underground utility line installations to be completed within 120 days from the City’s issuance of a Notice to Proceed, and contingent upon ACI providing the required payment and performance bonds and satisfactory proof of insurance. Additional information about ACI is included within Attachment D. City staff will be returning to the City Council in the coming months with additional contracts of the remaining scope of work to complete the project.

Attachments:

A. Resolution No. 22-025 - Bidding Waiver
B. Sourcewell ezIQC Construction Contract (Work Order) with Angeles Contractor Inc.

C. ezICQ Executive Summary
D. Angeles Contractor, Inc. Experience
1 1
8 3
7 ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 22-025
1 1
8 3
7 RESOLUTION NO. 22-025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

VICTORVILLE, CALIFORNIA WAIVING AND MODIFYING THE

PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES SET OUT IN ARTICLE IV, CHAPTER

2.28 OF THE VICTORVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSTRUCTION

OF AN INTERIM HOUSING PROJECT (WELLNESS CENTER) FOR

PERSONS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS OR AT RISK OF

HOMELESSNESS TO FACILITATE EXPEDITIOUS USE OF PROJECT

HOMEKEY FUNDS TO ADDRESS THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND PUBLIC
SAFETY IMPACTS OF COVID-19; AUTHORIZING PROJECT

CONSTRUCTION BY MEANS OF A COOPERATIVE PURCHASING

AGREEMENT (WORK ORDER) PROCURED THROUGH SOURCEWELL
WHEREAS, as stated in a report from the California Legislative Analyst’s Office on the 2022-23 Budget and the Governor’s Homelessness Plan (the “Report”), the high cost of housing is a significant factor in the state’s homelessness crisis and “more people experienced homelessness in California than any other state”; and WHEREAS, said Report further observed that that those living in poverty were the most significantly affected by California’s high housing costs—with over 1.5 million low-income households facing the most dire cost pressures—spending more than half of their income on housing, and that “for this population, job loss or an unexpected expense could result in homelessness”; and
WHEREAS, while the annual homeless point in time counts in San Bernardino County (the “County”) were postponed in 2021 and delayed in 2022 by the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of Victorville (the “City”) had the second highest homeless population in the County as of 2020, with numbers likely to be even higher in 2022 as a result of the economic impacts of COVID-19 and the exacerbation of the housing crisis by the pandemic; and
WHEREAS, because of the escalating housing crisis and the effects of the pandemic, the City has been continuously funding and operating various interim homeless shelters since March of 2020 to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City continues to utilize multiple isolation/quarantine tents outside the Westwinds interim homeless shelter, which were needed to curb COVID-19 outbreaks that occurred among shelter occupants in December 2021 and January 2022, but are maintained at the ready should further COVID-19 variants and infections emerge; and 1 1
8 3
7 WHEREAS, such interim shelters and tents attempt to address the needs of the City’s homeless population, alleviate the impacts of chronic homelessness on the community at large, and mitigate the impacts of COVID-19, but such temporary shelters cannot provide longer term solutions to the homelessness crises now facing the City and other communities throughout the State; and
WHEREAS, California’s Homekey Program, together with other programs being funded by the 2022-23 State budget, continues a statewide effort to sustain and rapidly expand housing for persons experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness, and who are, thereby, inherently impacted by COVID-19 and other communicable diseases; and
WHEREAS, as set forth in Resolution No. 21-101, the City applied for grant funding under the Homekey Round 2 program to construct the Wellness Center, which will consist of non-congregate manufactured interim housing units containing 170 Beds/Units (120 shelter beds and 50 recuperative care beds) grouped into clusters around onsite support services on approximately 4.5 acres of land owned by or under the control of the City near Eva Dell Park (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the City received a Homekey Program Round 2 award of funds letter on December 15, 2021 for the Project, which per program guidelines requires construction of the Project to be completed by December 15, 2022, unless otherwise extended by the California Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HCD”); and WHEREAS, on March 3, 2022, the HCD provided the City with the Homekey Grant Standard Agreement, which memorializes the City’s acceptance of the grant and the terms and conditions thereof, which Standard Agreement must be executed and returned to the HCD within thirty (30) days; and
WHEREAS, were the City’s typical public works project bidding process to be utilized, the City would be unable to achieve a December 15, 2022 construction completion deadline for the Project using Homekey funding, and the ability to extend the deadline for construction past this date is uncertain; and WHEREAS, Article IV of Chapter 2.28 of the Victorville Municipal Code (“VMC”) establishes various standards and procedures which apply to the procurement, bidding, award, and performance of various types of public works contracts, including construction projects; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.28.230 of said Article IV further provides that the City Council, after reviewing and considering the facts of a particular public works project, may waive or modify the bidding requirements of Article IV by finding that one or more of the circumstances set forth in Section 2.28.230 exists and setting forth in a resolution the facts and circumstances supporting its determination that one or more of the bidding exceptions set forth therein exempts a public works project from the bidding requirements; and
1 1
8 3
7 WHEREAS, VMC Section 2.28.230 also provides that such resolution shall be adopted by a 4/5 vote and shall specify the manner in which such public works project shall be procured; and
WHEREAS, a City Council finding that “the cost of the work would be significantly increased, or its completion significantly delayed”, as well as findings that “there would be no competitive advantage to requiring bidding for the contract”; or “other specific considerations justifying the waiver of the bidding requirements exist”; are among the circumstances justifying a waiver/modification of the bidding requirements to be set forth in such resolution; and
WHEREAS, a City Council determination that an emergency, defined in VMC Section 2.28.050 as “sudden occurrence that poses a threat to the public health, safety or welfare, and/or the property of the city requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services” exists is also among the circumstances supporting waiver of the bidding requirements; and WHEREAS, VMC Section 2.28.120 permits the City Manager to make certain purchases of supplies and equipment without utilizing competitive bidding procedures if such purchases are based on an agreement or cooperative purchasing program entered into by any local, state or federal governmental agency and the City, provided the underlying purchase was made using quotation or bid procedures at least as restrictive as the City's; and
WHEREAS, for over five years, the City has been a member of the cooperative purchasing program provided by Sourcewell (formerly NJPA); and WHEREAS, after reviewing the documentation provided by Sourcewell for construction projects involving manufactured interim housing units in the high desert region, City Staff has determined that the public works project bidding procedure utilized in said solicitation was competitive and comparable to the standard process used by the City; and
WHEREAS, based on the above recitals, the City Council makes the following findings, which together or independently, support the modification/waiver of its customary public works bidding procedures: (1) that utilizing the traditional public works bidding process would cause the completion of the work on the Project to be significantly delayed and the necessary Homekey funding to be lost; (2) that without such funding, the City could not otherwise construct the Project and would lose a vital opportunity to make meaningful strides toward combating homelessness; (3) that given the Sourcewell competitive bid procedures, there would further be no competitive advantage in requiring the City to utilize its usual bid procedures in constructing the Project; and (4) that an emergency exists, given the lack of affordable housing, the high number of persons experiencing homelessness in the City, the lingering threat of recurring COVID-19 infections, and the City’s inability to adequately mitigate the threats to the public health, safety, and welfare these circumstances have created without immediately commencing construction of the Project.
1 1
8 3
7 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1.Recitals and Findings.

That the Recitals set forth above and the findings set forth therein are true and correct and are hereby made an operative part of this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Bidding Requirements Waived.

That the City’s customary bidding requirements applicable to the letting of public works construction contracts for projects with an estimated cost of more than five hundred thousand dollars, as set forth in VMC Section 2.28.210, are hereby waived with respect to the construction of the Wellness Center (the “Project”) in accordance with Section

2.28.230 of the VMC and based on the Recitals and findings set forth herein.

Section 3. Procurement Authorized through Cooperative Purchasing.

That construction of the Project through use of a Cooperative Purchasing indefinite quantity construction agreement procured through Sourcewell is authorized.

Section 4. Bonding and Insurance
All Cooperative Purchasing construction agreements (referred to by Sourcewell and its various competitively procured contractors as (“Work Orders”), are contingent upon receipt by the City the required bonds and satisfactory proof of the required insurance coverage prior to issuance by the City to the Contractor the Notice to Proceed.

Section 5. Effective Date.

That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Section 6. Certification.

That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution by a 4/5 vote of the City Council.

P:\APPS\WPDATA\VVCA\0001-41-NAVIGATION WELLNESS CENTER\DOCS\500.6-ATTACHMENT A - RESOLUTION 22-025 BIDDING EXEMPTION FOR HOMEKEY SW EDITS TLT REV.DOCX

ATTACHMENT B
Sourcewell ezIQC Construction Contract with Angeles Contractor Inc.

Work Order Signature Document
EZIQC Contract No.: CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
New Work Order
102420.00
Work Order Title:

Work Order Number.:

X Modify an Existing Work Order
Work Order Date: 03/10/2022
Contractor Name:

Contact:

Phone:

Contact:

Phone:

Young Kang, President
626.923.3800
Owner Name:

Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1
City of Victorville
Keith C. Metzler, City Manager
760.955.5029
Angeles Contractor Inc.

Work to be Performed
Work to be performed as per the Final Detailed Scope of Work Attached and as per the terms and conditions of Sourcewell ezIQC Contract No.

CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI, the terms and conditions of the attached Exhibit A (City of Victorville Amendment to Work Order No. 102420.00), and the terms and conditions of the attached Exhibit B (Provisional Language).

Brief Work Order Description: Victorville Wellness Center per the project plans provide d by the City. Contractor to develop full scope for owner's review and approval. See Detailed Scope of Work Document for reference.

X Will not apply:Liquidated Damages Will apply:

Estimated Start Date: 04/01/2022
Estimated Completion Date: 07/31/2022
Time of Performance
Work Order Price: $4,827,947.76

THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Date
By
Print Name

2.00