Agenda packet — Victorville City Council, October 17, 2023 (part 2 of 2)

AMENDMENT NUMBER: ONE
TO

CONSULTANT/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROVIDER

AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AND
PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.

FOR

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR

THE BEAR VALLEY OVERHEAD AT BNSF RAILROAD PROJECT,
PROJECT BM21-034-2

THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into this ____ day of _______, 2023, by and between the City of Victorville, a municipal corporation, organized and existing in the County of San Bernardino under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. , a State of Illinois corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”, City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties”.

Recitals

1. WHEREAS, the City has a Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Original Agreement”) with the Consultant to provide Construction Management Services for the Bear Valley Overhead at BNSF Railroad Project; and

2. WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Parties to issue Amendment One (1) to the Original Agreement to increase Section 3., Compensation by $260,000.00, thereby revising the total cumulative not to exceed sum from $1,658,408.18 to $1,918,408.18; and amend Section 6. a., Term of Agreement to end on December 31, 2023; and

3. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, and promises contained herein and for such other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties are willing to amend the Original Agreement as stated below.

Contract Amendment

Section 3. – COMPENSATION – is amended as follows:

“The City shall pay to Consultant a sum not to exceed One Million, Nine Hundred Eighteen Thousand Four Hundred Eight and 18/100 dollars ($1,918,408.18) for faithful performance of the services to be rendered under this Agreement, subject to the Fee Schedule provisions of Section 4, below.”

Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Parsons Transportation Group, Inc./Project BM20-034- 2/Amendment 1

Page 2 of 3 ends

Section 6. – TERM OF AGREEMENT – is amended as follows:

“The City hereby amends the Term of Agreement end on December 31, 2023 (the “Termination Date”), unless terminated earlier pursuant to Sections 21 to 43 of this Agreement or extended by Agreement amendment….”

NAME CHANGE

All references in the Original Agreement to “ Brian Gengler, City Engineer ” are amended and replaced with “Fredy A. Bonilla, P.E., City Engineer ”. In each Section of the Original Agreement in which the reference is to “ Brian Gengler, City Engineer, or his designee”, the reference is amended and replaced with “ Fredy A. Bonilla, P.E., City Engineer, or his designee.

Except as amended herein, t he terms and conditions of the O riginal Agreement and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect.

(SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)

Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Parsons Transportation Group, Inc./Project BM20-034- 2/Amendment 1

Page 3 of 3 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Amendment to the Original Agreement to be entered as of the dates written below.

PARTY OF THE FIRST PART PARTY OF THE SECOND PART

THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP,
INC.

By:_______________________________ By:________________________________ Debra Jones, Chris Johnson,
Mayor Vice President

Dated:______________________________ Dated:______________________________

ATTEST

By:_________________________________
Jennifer Thompson,
City Clerk

Dated:_______________________________

THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE APPROVED AS TO STANDARD FORM

By:________________________________ By:______________________________ Sandra Bostick, Andre de Bortnowsky,
Risk Manager City Attorney

Dated:______________________________ Dated:_____________________________

Item Number: 8
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: October 17, 2023
Submitted By:

Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer

Subject:

Wellness Center Project - Phase 1 Supplemental Work Order (SWO) Nos. 12 & 13 and Phase 2 Supplemental Work Order No. 11
Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council approve the following:
1) Phase 1 - SWO No. 12 for the Wellness Center construction contract resulting in an increase not to exceed $51,189.83;
2) Phase 1 - SWO No. 13 for the Wellness Center construction contract resulting in a decrease of $120,670.75; and
3) Phase 2 - SWO No. 11 for the Wellness Center construction contract resulting in an increase not to exceed $67,019.57.

Fiscal Impact:

This action will not result in a fiscal impact as the net effect to both phases is a credit in the amount of $2,461.35.

To date, prior to this recommended award, contracts and purchases totaling an estimated $40,603,523.83 have been approved for this project. Taking this action in accordance with the staff recommendation for this item will decrease total contracts and purchases to an estimated $40,601,062.48.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This item aligns with Goal D in the 2023 Strategic Plan, “Reduce Homelessness”.

Completion of the Wellness Center continues to be the City’s priority project to reduce homelessness through the provision of shelter and wraparound services.

Background:

On April 1, 2022, construction for Phase 1 started. The scope of the Phase 1 construction includes the following: the VVWRA Interceptor through the project boundaries; grading of 3 3
3 1
the site; a stormwater detention basin; and underground utilities for storm drain, sewer, domestic water, fire suppression, electrical, and gas. The project was separated into two construction phases to start construction as soon as feasible with the goal of completing construction by December 15, 2022, which was the original Homekey grant deadline.

Phase 1 was started while the plans for the project were being completed. The Phase 1 plans were subsequently approved by the City for grading, drainage, sewer, domestic water, fire suppression, plumbing, and electrical.

On April 5, 2022, City Council approved contracts with Connect Homes in the amount not to exceed of $5,067,607.00 for the manufacturing of 46 modular shelter units, and Urban Bloc in the amount not to exceed of $1,200,021.00 for the manufacturing of five modular bathroom units. On June 2, 2022, City Council approved a contract with Connect Homes in the amount not to exceed of $3,385,515.00 for the manufacturing of 24 modular units for four community buildings. On July 19, 2022, City Council approved SWO Nos. 1 through 4 for the Phase 1 construction contract.

The plans for Phase 2 of the Project were subsequently completed to include street improvements, structural work, architectural work, and landscaping. The scope of the Phase 2 construction includes a sewer lift station and grease interceptor; street improvements; a fire access road; a parking lot; building foundations; anchoring the modular buildings to the foundations; electrical wiring; utility connections to the buildings; finishes on the community buildings; food service equipment in the cafeteria building; wood decking for porches and patios; accessible concrete sidewalk and paths; irrigation; landscaping; fencing; gates; and other miscellaneous improvements.

On August 16, 2022, City Council approved a Construction Contract / Work Order with Angeles Contractor Inc., for the Phase 2 construction of the Wellness Center Project in an amount not to exceed $15,427,974.88. On the same agenda, City Council approved the purchase, manufacturing, and delivery of the sewer lift station from ROMTEC Utilities in the amount of $292,277.88. Phase 2 construction started on October 3, 2022.

On October 4, 2022, City Council approved SWO No. 7 for the Phase 1 construction contract. On December 20, 2022, City Council approved SWO Nos. 5 and 6 for the Phase 1 construction contract. On January 17, 2023, City Council approved SWO No. 1 for the Phase 2 construction contract. On February 7, 2023, City Council approved SWO Nos. 8 and 9 for the Phase 1 construction contract and SWO Nos. 2 and 3 for the Phase 2 construction contract. On June 6, 2023, City Council approved SWO Nos. 10 and 11 for the Phase 1 construction contract and SWO Nos. 4 through 8 for the Phase 2 contract.

On June 20, 2023, City Council approved SWO No. 9 for the Phase 2 contract. On August 15, 2023, City Council approved SWO No. 10 for the Phase 2 contract.

There have been delays in the project schedule, mainly due to ground water being higher than expected, revisions to the plans, and delays in procuring various equipment and materials. Staff requested periodic grant construction completion extensions to align with the construction timeline. Progress pictures and narrative reports were submitted to the 3 3
3 1
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to illustrate that the City was making progress on the project, but unforeseen circumstances caused delays.

On August 10, 2023, HCD advised that their management had agreed to consider additional requests for extensions, and on August 16, 2023, staff received confirmation that an extension was approved. The new construction completion milestone deadline is October 2023, with an occupancy/operational milestone deadline of January 17, 2024 (90 days following construction completion).

Currently, construction is estimated to be complete by October of 2023, unless there are additional delays. Staff is working with the general contractor, Angeles Contractor and Pacifica Services, the construction manager to potential mitigate delays.

Discussion:

As discussed above, for Phase 1, SWO Nos. 1 through 11 were previously approved by City Council. SWO No. 12 documents additional scope of work for the repairs to an existing storm drain that traverses the site. SWO No. 12 documents a credit for the reduced grading (soil export) that was value engineered. The net effect of SWO Nos. 12 and 13 is a credit in the amount of $69,480.92. These are the final supplemental work orders for Phase 1.

Similarly, for Phase 2, SWO Nos. 1 through 10 were previously approved by City Council.

SWO No. 11 documents added scope including electrical, asphalt paving, framing & drywall, roofing, and concrete. SWO No. 12 also includes a credit for the elimination of EV chargers, washers & dryers, French drains, and benches. The net effect of SWO No. 12 is $67,019.57.

Tables 1 through 5, shown below, summarize the SWO and the project costs to date for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 contracts:

Table 1
Phase 1 Supplemental Work Order Summary
SWO No. Description Amount
1 Fabric & rock under building pads 5, 6 & 7 $120,399.24 2 Dewatering system for VVWRA interceptor $165,785.99
3 Additional dewatering system for VVWRA interceptor $254,552.92 4 Transportation - Connect Home 46 modular shelter units $222,388.87 5 Additional work for drainage and water systems $447,908.47 6 Credits to SWO Nos. 1, 3 & 4 -$234,123.74
7 Offsite electrical work for SCE service $302,968.86
8 Various items $704,326.76
9 General Conditions of Phase 1 Contract $32,397.21 10 Relocate SCE vault $32,763.01
11 Delays costs. Extra security. Regrade pads due to
design changes.
$407,923.95
12 Storm drain repairs $51,189.83
13 Reduced grading (value engineering) -$120,670.75 3 3
3 1
Total $2,387,810.62
Table 2
Phase 1 Construction Contract Summary
Original Contract Amount $4,827,947.76
SWO Nos. 1 - 11 (previously approved) $2,457,291.54
SWO No. 12 $51,189.83
SWO No. 13 -$120,670.75
Total Contract Amount $7,215,758.38
Table 3
Phase 2 Supplemental Work Order Summary
SWO No. Description Amount
1 Various changes to modular buildings $173,929.87 2 Various items $150,220.85
3 Additional sidewalk and waterproofing for buildings $57,336.01 4 Additional scope not included in original contract to complete Connect Homes units
$481,629.94
5 Additional scope for vents, metal frames and
concrete for HVAC.
$82,893.98
6 Added scope and costs related to modular buildings $743,461.71 7 Added scope for miscellaneous items. $457,334.66 8 Added scope for miscellaneous items. $79,917.50 9 Requested. Completing modular units. $1,640,679.38
10 Sewer lift station and added scope for miscellaneous items.
$742,519.70
11 Added scope for miscellaneous items. $67,019.57 Total $4,676,943.17
Table 4
Phase 2 Construction Contract Summary
Original Contract Amount $15,427,974.88
SWO Nos. 1 - 10 (previously
approved)
$4,609,923.60
SWO No. 11 $67,019.57
Total Contract Amount $20,104,918.05
Table 5
Phase 1 & 2 Contracts
Original Contract Amount $20,255,922.64
Total SWO $7,064,753.79
Total Contract Amount $27,320,676.43
3 3
3 1
The backup for Phase 1 Supplemental Work Order (SWO) Nos. 12 and 13 are included in Attachment A. Similarly, the backup for Phase 2 SWO No. 12 is included in Attachment B. City staff and Pacifica Services, Inc., have reviewed the work and associated costs and recommend approval.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Phase 1 SWO Nos. 12 and 13 and Phase 2 SWO No. 11 for the Wellness Center construction contracts resulting in an overall decrease in the amount of $2,461.35.

Staff is available for any questions Council may have.

Attachments: A. Phase 1 SWO Nos. 12 and 13 with Backup
B. Phase 2 SWO No. 11 with Backup

Attachment A

Work Order Signature Document
EZIQC Contract No.: CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
New Work Order X Modify an Existing Work Order
Work Order Number.: 102420.12 Work Order Date: 08/07/2023 Work Order Title:

Owner Name:

Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #12
City of Victorville
Brian Gengler
760.955.5135
Contractor Name: Angeles Contractor Inc.

Contact:

Phone:

Contact:

Phone:

Jay Kwon
714.290.7437
Work to be Performed
Work to be performed as per the Final Detailed Scope of Work Attached and as per the terms and conditions of Sourcewell EZIQC Contract No CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI.

Brief Work Order Description:

Time of Performance
Liquidated Damages
Estimated Start Date:

Estimated Completion Date:

XWill apply: Will not apply:

Work Order Firm Fixed Price: $51,189.83
Owner Purchase Order Number:

Approvals
Date Contractor DateCity of Victorville
Work Order Signature Document Page 1 of 1
8/7/2023

Detailed Scope of Work
To: Jay Kwon From: Brian Gengler
Angeles Contractor Inc. City of Victorville
783 Phillips Drive 14343 Civic Dr
City of Industry, CA 91748
714.290.7437
Victorville, CA 92392
760.955.5135
Date Printed: August 07, 2023
102420.12Work Order Number:

Work Order Title:

Brief Scope:

Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #12
Preliminary Revised X Final
The following items detail the scope of work as discussed at the site. All requirements necessary to accomplish the items set forth below shall be considered part of this scope of work.

PHASE 1 SUPPLEMENTAL WORK ORDER #102420.12 [SWO #12] SCOPE OF WORK:

I. The Contractor shall perform scope of work and shall provide all labors, materials, equipment, and tools necessary to complete in a workmanlike manner for the following;

1. Re-works underground storm drain pipelines shown in revised precise grading plan sheet 11 of 15 for per RFI #189 response.

II. Attachments:

1. Backup Documents-RFI #189 and NPP Worksheet
III. Clarifications and Exclusions;

1. 2.

Phase 2 Work is excluded
SWO #12 time impact to Phase 1 construction schedule is an additional 12 working days.

Subject to the terms and conditions of JOC Contract CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI.

Contractor Date
DateCity of Victorville
Scope of Work Page 1 of 1
8/7/2023

Contractor's Price Proposal - Summary
Date:

Re:

August 07, 2023
IQC Master Contract #:

Work Order #:

Owner PO #:

Title:

CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
102420.12
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #12
Angeles Contractor Inc.Contractor:

Proposal Value: $51,189.83
PHASE 1 SWO #12-Revised Storm Drain Plans per RFI #189
Proposal Total
$51,189.83
$51,189.83
Thisl total represents the correct total for the proposal. Any discrepancy between line totals, sub-totals and the proposal total is due to rounding.

The Percentage of NPP on this Proposal: 97.85%
Contractor's Price Proposal - Summary Page 1 of 1
8/7/2023

Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail
Date:

Re:

August 07, 2023
IQC Master Contract #:

Work Order #:

Owner PO #:

Title:

CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
102420.12
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #12
Angeles Contractor Inc.Contractor:

Proposal Value: $51,189.83
Sect. Item Mod. UOM Description Line Total
Labor Equip. Material (Excludes)
PHASE 1 SWO #12-Revised Storm Drain Plans per RFI #189
1 01 22 16 00 0002 EA Reimbursable FeesReimbursable Fees will be paid to the contractor for eligible costs as directed by Owner. Insert the appropriate quantity to adjust the base cost to the actual Reimbursable Fee. If there are multiple Reimbursable Fees, list each one separately and add a comment in the "note" block to identify the Reimbursable Fee (e.g. sidewalk closure, road cut, various permits, extended warranty, expedited shipping costs, etc.). A copy of each receipt shall be submitted with the Price Proposal.
$1,101.94
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
1,101.94Installation =x x1,001.76 1.00 1.1000
PHASE 1 SWO #12 - Bond Fees calculated at 2% of total amount of $50,087.89 2 33 40 00 00 1001 LS Re-works Underground Storm Drain Pipelines per Revised Precise Grading Plan
$50,087.89
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
50,087.89NPP Installation =x x1.00 38,860.96 1.2889
PHASE 1 SWO #12 - Re-works underground storm drain pipelines per RFI #189 revised PGP sheet 11 of 15, scope includes removal previously installed pipes and replace with new, lower previously installed 4" HDPE pipes per new invert level, install new tees to storm drain pipelines for roof drains Subtotal for PHASE 1 SWO #12-Revised Storm Drain Plans per RFI #189
$51,189.83
$51,189.83Proposal Total
This total represents the correct total for the proposal. Any discrepancy between line totals, sub-totals and the proposal total is due to rounding.

The Percentage of NPP on this Proposal: 97.85%
Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail Page 1 of 1
8/7/2023

Contractor's Non-Prepriced Worksheet
Date: 8/7/2023
Re: Job Order
Title
102420.12
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #12

SECTION ITEM UOM DESCRIPTION
33 40 00 00 1001 LS Re-works Underground Storm Drain Pipelines per Revised Precise Grading Plan
Install Price: 38,860.96 X Install Quantity: 1.00 =
X
=
Install Total: $38,860.96

1.2889Factor:

Line Item Total: $50,087.89
For Work Performed with the Contractor's Own Forces:

A. Direct Labor Costs through Foreman Level
(Current Prevailing Wage Rate + Published Fringe Benefits) Direct Material Costs (Supported by 3 Quotes)*B.

C. Direct Equipment Costs (For Equipment NOT in the CTC) Total Cost for Self-perform NPP Work Task =
(A+B+C) x Non-Prepriced Work Task Adjustment Factor
*Material Cost Quotes
(Attach quotes from listed suppliers/subcontractors. A Justification Letter must be attached if 3 quotes are not furnished.)

1. 2.

3. $
$
$
For Work Performed By Subcontractors:
38,860.96G. Subcontractor Costs**
(Supported by Quotes) (This Should be the Price Entered into PROGEN)

1.2889H.

Contractor's Non Pre-Priced Adjustment Factor
50,087.89 Total Price for NPP Items being Performed by Subcontractors = G x H **Subcontractor Cost Quotes
(Attach quotes from listed suppliers/subcontractors. A Justification Letter must be attached if 3 quotes are not furnished.) Kerns 38,860.961.

2. 3.
$
$
$
*Single subcontractor
quote approved by Pacifica.

Convert to Unit Price
Non-Prepriced Worksheet Page 1 of 29

ATTACHMENT TO NPP ITEM 33400000-1001 Re-works Underground Storm Drain

Subcontractor Listing
Date:

Re:

August 07, 2023
IQC Master Contract #:

Work Order #:

Owner PO #:

Title:

CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
102420.12
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #12
Angeles Contractor Inc.Contractor:

Proposal Value: $51,189.83
Duties Amount
$38,860.96
%Name of Contractor

KERNS INC A CALIFORNIA

CORPORATION
Site Utilities 75.92
Subcontractor Listing Page 1 of 1
8/7/2023

Work Order Signature Document
EZIQC Contract No.: CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
New Work Order X Modify an Existing Work Order
Work Order Number.: 102420.13 Work Order Date: 08/24/2023 Work Order Title:

Owner Name:

Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13
City of Victorville
Scott Webb
Contractor Name: Angeles Contractor Inc.

Contact:

Phone:

Contact:

Phone:

Jay Kwon
760.955.5135 714.290.7437
Work to be Performed
Work to be performed as per the Final Detailed Scope of Work Attached and as per the terms and conditions of Sourcewell EZIQC Contract No CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI.

Brief Work Order Description:

Time of Performance
Liquidated Damages
Estimated Start Date:

Estimated Completion Date:

XWill apply: Will not apply:

Work Order Firm Fixed Price: $-120,670.75
Owner Purchase Order Number:

Approvals
Date Contractor DateCity of Victorville
Work Order Signature Document Page 1 of 1
8/24/2023

Detailed Scope of Work
To: Jay Kwon From: Brian Gengler
Angeles Contractor Inc. City of Victorville
783 Phillips Drive 14343 Civic Dr
Victorville,CA
760.955.5135
City of Industry, CA 91748
714.290.7437
Date Printed: August 24, 2023
102420.13Work Order Number:

Work Order Title:

Brief Scope:

Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13
Preliminary Revised X Final
The following items detail the scope of work as discussed at the site. All requirements necessary to accomplish the items set forth below shall be considered part of this scope of work.

PHASE 1 SUPPLEMENTAL WORK ORDER #102420.13 [SWO #13] SCOPE OF WORK:

I. The Contractor shall perform scope of work and shall provide all labors, materials, equipment, and tools necessary to complete in a workmanlike manner for the following;

1. Adjust storm drain manhole to match fire access road and landscape finish level per RFI #272 response

2. 3.

Storm drain underground pipe repairs.

Credit for Phase 1 base contract for soils export in retention basin grading II. Attachments:

1. Backup Documents-RFI #272, MMG Engineering soils export tickets and NPP Worksheet
III. Clarifications and Exclusions;

1. 2.

Phase 2 Work is excluded
SWO #13 time impact to Phase 1 construction schedule is an additional 40 working days.

Subject to the terms and conditions of ezIQC Contract CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI.

Scope of Work Page 1 of 2
8/24/2023

Detailed Scope of Work Continues..

Work Order Number: 102420.13
Work Order Title: Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13 Contractor Date
DateCity of Victorville
Scope of Work Page 2 of 2
8/24/2023

Contractor's Price Proposal - Summary
Date:

Re:

August 24, 2023
IQC Master Contract #:

Work Order #:

Owner PO #:

Title:

CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
102420.13
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13
Angeles Contractor Inc.Contractor:

Proposal Value: -$120,670.75
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Adjust Storm Drain Manhole $5,285.78
$292.25PHASE 1 SWO #13-Bond Fees
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Bond Fees Credit for Phase 1 Base Contract PHASE 1 SWO #13-Credit for Phase 1 Base Contract Soils Export PHASE 1 SWO #13-Storm Drain Underground Pipe Repairs
-$1,460.65
-$132,786.19
$7,998.06
Proposal Total -$120,670.75
Thisl total represents the correct total for the proposal. Any discrepancy between line totals, sub-totals and the proposal total is due to rounding.

Contractor's Price Proposal - Summary Page 1 of 1
8/24/2023

Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail
Date:

Re:

August 24, 2023
IQC Master Contract #:

Work Order #:

Owner PO #:

Title:

CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
102420.13
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13
Angeles Contractor Inc.Contractor:

Proposal Value: -$120,670.75
Sect. Item Mod. UOM Description Line Total
Labor Equip. Material (Excludes)
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Adjust Storm Drain Manhole
1 33 41 16 00 2002 LS Storm Drain System Modifications by Adjusting and Raised Manhole Cover to Match Fire Access Road and Landscape Finish Level
$5,285.78
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
5,285.78NPP Installation =x x1.00 4,101.00 1.2889
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Adjust Storm Drain Manhole per RFI #272 response Subtotal for PHASE 1 SWO #13-Adjust Storm Drain Manhole PHASE 1 SWO #13-Bond Fees
$5,285.78
2 01 22 16 00 0002 EA Reimbursable FeesReimbursable Fees will be paid to the contractor for eligible costs as directed by Owner. Insert the appropriate quantity to adjust the base cost to the actual Reimbursable Fee. If there are multiple Reimbursable Fees, list each one separately and add a comment in the "note" block to identify the Reimbursable Fee (e.g. sidewalk closure, road cut, various permits, extended warranty, expedited shipping costs, etc.). A copy of each receipt shall be submitted with the Price Proposal.
$292.25
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
292.25Installation =x x265.68 1.00 1.1000
PHASE 1 SWO #13 - Bond Fees for change order calculated at 2% of total amount of $13,283.84 Subtotal for PHASE 1 SWO #13-Bond Fees $292.25
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Bond Fees Credit for Phase 1 Base Contract 3 01 22 16 00 0002 EA Reimbursable FeesReimbursable Fees will be paid to the contractor for eligible costs as directed by Owner. Insert the appropriate quantity to adjust the base cost to the actual Reimbursable Fee. If there are multiple Reimbursable Fees, list each one separately and add a comment in the "note" block to identify the Reimbursable Fee (e.g. sidewalk closure, road cut, various permits, extended warranty, expedited shipping costs, etc.). A copy of each receipt shall be submitted with the Price Proposal.
-$1,460.65
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
-1,460.65Installation =x x-1,327.86 1.00 1.1000
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Bond Fees Credit for Phase 1 Base Contract calculated at 1% of total amount of $132,786.19
Subtotal for PHASE 1 SWO #13-Bond Fees Credit for Phase 1 Base Contract
-$1,460.65
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Credit for Phase 1 Base Contract Soils Export 4 01 22 23 00 1423 WK 13 CY Rear Dump Truck With Full-Time Truck Driver -$76,137.05 Quantity
-10.00
Unit Price
6,124.28
Factor

1.2432
Total
-76,137.05Installation =x x
PHASE 1 SWO #13-CREDIT for Phase 1 Base Contract soils export at Retention Basin [12 weeks less 2 weeks = 10 weeks credit back
5 31 23 16 33 0020 CY Loading Excess Material For Removal From Bulk Excavation -$56,649.14 Quantity Unit Price

5.53 Factor

1.2432
Total
-56,649.14Installation =x x-8,240.00
PHASE 1 SWO #13-CREDIT for Phase 1 Base Contract soils export at Retention Basin [10,000 CY less 1,760 CY = 8,240 CY credit back
Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail Page 1 of 2
8/24/2023

Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail Continues..

Work Order Number: 102420.13
Work Order Title: Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13 Subtotal for PHASE 1 SWO #13-Credit for Phase 1 Base Contract Soils Export
-$132,786.19
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Storm Drain Underground Pipe Repairs
6 33 41 16 00 2003 LS Storm Drain System Underground Pipe Repairs $7,998.06 Quantity

1.00 Unit Price
6,205.34
Factor

1.2889
Total
7,998.06NPP Installation =x x
PHASE 1 SWO #13-Storm Drain Underground Pipe Repairs
Subtotal for PHASE 1 SWO #13-Storm Drain Underground Pipe Repairs
$7,998.06
Proposal Total -$120,670.75
This total represents the correct total for the proposal. Any discrepancy between line totals, sub-totals and the proposal total is due to rounding.

Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail Page 2 of 2
8/24/2023

Subcontractor Listing
Date:

Re:

August 24, 2023
IQC Master Contract #:

Work Order #:

Owner PO #:

Title:

CA-R8-GB06-123021-ACI
102420.13
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13
Angeles Contractor Inc.Contractor:

Proposal Value: -$120,670.75
Duties Amount
$10,306.34
%Name of Contractor

KERNS INC A CALIFORNIA

CORPORATION
Site Utilities -8.54
Subcontractor Listing Page 1 of 1
8/24/2023

Contractor's Non-Prepriced Worksheet
Date: 8/24/2023
Re: Job Order
Title
102420.13
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13

SECTION ITEM UOM DESCRIPTION
33 41 16 00 2002 LS Storm Drain System Modifications by Adjusting and Raised Manhole Cover to Match Fire Access Road and Landscape Finish Level Install Price: 4,101.00 X Install Quantity: 1.00 =
X
=
Install Total: $4,101.00

1.2889Factor:

Line Item Total: $5,285.78
For Work Performed with the Contractor's Own Forces:

A. Direct Labor Costs through Foreman Level
(Current Prevailing Wage Rate + Published Fringe Benefits) Direct Material Costs (Supported by 3 Quotes)*B.

1. 2.

3. $
$
$
For Work Performed By Subcontractors:
4,101.00G. Subcontractor Costs**
(Supported by Quotes) (This Should be the Price Entered into PROGEN)

1.2889H.

Contractor's Non Pre-Priced Adjustment Factor
5,285.78 Total Price for NPP Items being Performed by Subcontractors = G x H **Subcontractor Cost Quotes
(Attach quotes from listed suppliers/subcontractors. A Justification Letter must be attached if 3 quotes are not furnished.) Kerns Inc $4,101.001.

2. 3.
$
$
$
Convert to Unit Price
Non-Prepriced Worksheet Page 1 of 60

Contractor's Non-Prepriced Worksheet
Date: 8/24/2023
Re: Job Order
Title
102420.13
Victorville Wellness Center, phase 1 Supplemental #13

SECTION ITEM UOM DESCRIPTION
33 41 16 00 2003 LS Storm Drain System Underground Pipe Repairs Install Price: 6,205.34 X Install Quantity: 1.00 =
X
=
Install Total:

Factor:
$6,205.34

1.2889
Line Item Total: $7,998.06
For Work Performed with the Contractor's Own Forces:

A. Direct Labor Costs through Foreman Level
(Current Prevailing Wage Rate + Published Fringe Benefits) Direct Material Costs (Supported by 3 Quotes)*B.

1. 2.

3. $
$
$
For Work Performed By Subcontractors:
6,205.34G. Subcontractor Costs**
(Supported by Quotes) (This Should be the Price Entered into PROGEN)

1.2889H.

Contractor's Non Pre-Priced Adjustment Factor
7,889.06 Total Price for NPP Items being Performed by Subcontractors = G x H **Subcontractor Cost Quotes
(Attach quotes from listed suppliers/subcontractors. A Justification Letter must be attached if 3 quotes are not furnished.) Kerns Inc 6,205.341.

2. 3.
$
$
$
Convert to Unit Price
Non-Prepriced Worksheet Page 60 of 60

ATTACHMENT TO NPP ITEM 33411600-2003
Change Order: 1459 - 22 / Date: 5/9/2023
Project Number: #1459
Kerns Inc a California Corporation
17560 Catalpa St
Hesperia, CA
92345, US
+17609498800
Prepared By:

Matt Bickhart
(760) 949-8800
[email protected]
Project: #1459 VICTORVILLE WELLNESS
Scope of Work
Repair 18" SD hit by others
Quantity
6 hrs
6 hrs
10 hrs
1 ea
Unit Cost
$ 106.36
$ 103.84
$ 78.00
$ 672.97
$ 47.96
$ 28.50
Total Cost
$ 638.16
$ 623.04
$ 780.00
$ 672.97
$ 287.76
$ 171.00
Foreman @ $106.36
Operator @ $103.84
Laborer @ $78.00
Western Water Works Material
Mini X 6 ea
Truck & Tools With Fuel Tank 6 ea
Notes
Summary
Price
Labor and Adjustments
Materials
Equipment
Profit
$ 2,041.20
$ 672.97
$ 458.76
$ 317.29
Subtotal $ 3,490.22
Accepted By Date
$ 3,490.22

ATTACHMENT TO NPP ITEM 33411600-2003

ATTACHMENT TO NPP ITEM 33411600-2002

VVWC 272 Detail report
RFI detail
#272 Manhole Covers Elevation
Status Closed
Created on
Ball in court
answered
May 31, 2023 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
May 31, 2023 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Question
After installing the manholes as per the approved plans elevations, three manhole covers need to be raised to match with landscaping and Fire Access Road as per the attached photo, please confirm.

Official response
Raise the Elevation of the manhole covers as necessary to match with the finish surface of the surrounding area.

Myung Chung
on 5/31/2023 at 11:40 AM
Ayman Hanna (ACI) - May 31, 2023, 11:51 AM PDT
References
Files (1)
• RFI # 272 Manhole Cover Elevation.pdf
Impact
Cost impact Yes
YesSchedule impact
Other attributes
Priority High
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodesk® Construction Cloud™ on May 31, 2023 at 11:51 AM PDT Page 1 of 3

VVWC 272 Detail report
Discipline -
-
-
-
-
Category
Location
Location details
External id
Co-reviewer(s) Ali Nazari (Pacifica)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Cruz Baez (Pacifica)
Ed Herrera (Pacifica)
Jay Kwon (ACI)
Luis Diaz (Pacifica)
Myung Chung (CMC)
Nathan Williams (Pacifica)
Rick Hernandez (Pacifica)
Sal Diaz (Pacifica)
Sal Torres (Pacifica)
Scott Webb
Stephan Longoria
Steve Spooner (ACI)
Architect
Construction Manager
Contractor
Executive
Field Inspector
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Superintendent
ACI
CMC
Pacifica
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodesk® Construction Cloud™ on May 31, 2023 at 11:51 AM PDT Page 2 of 3

VVWC 272 Detail report
Activities By At
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open Answered to Closed
Ayman
Hanna
May 31, 2023, 11:51
AM PDT
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open In Review to Open Answered Ayman
Hanna
May 31, 2023, 11:51
AM PDTOfficial response: Raise the Elevation of the manhole covers as necessary to match with the finish surface of the surrounding area.

Myung Chung on 5/31/2023 at 11:40 AM
Raise the Elevation of the manhole covers as necessary to match with the finish surface of the surrounding area.

Myung
Chung
May 31, 2023, 11:40
AM PDT
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 272 Manhole Cover Elevation.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
May 31, 2023, 9:42
AM PDT
Ayman Hanna (ACI) created this RFI in Closed status and set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Ayman
Hanna
May 31, 2023, 9:42
AM PDT
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodesk® Construction Cloud™ on May 31, 2023 at 11:51 AM PDT Page 3 of 3

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 272Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive 05-31-2023
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Manhole Covers Elevation.

Reference:

Drawing No:

Specification:

Tel: (626) 405-0131
Fax:

Respond by: High priority Submitted by: Ayman Hanna
Questions or Clarification:

Please clarify,
After installing the manholes as per the approved plans elevations, three manhole covers need to be raised to match with landscaping and Fire Access Road as per the attached photo, please confirm URGENT, WORK IN PROGRESS.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Potential cost impact?
Response:

Potential schedule impact?Yes No Yes No
Response by:

Date:

$WWDFKPHQWꢀ%

ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂꢄꢈꢉꢊꢋꢌꢍꢎꢂꢇꢄꢏꢁꢐꢎꢑꢇꢋꢍ
ꢒꢓꢔꢕꢖꢄꢖꢁꢋꢍꢂꢌꢐꢍꢄꢗꢁꢘꢙꢄꢄꢖꢚꢛꢜꢝꢛꢞ !"ꢛ#$%!$#ꢛꢚꢖꢔ
ꢗꢇ&ꢄꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂ , 'ꢁꢆꢉ()ꢄꢌꢋꢄꢒ*ꢉ+ꢍꢉꢋꢊꢄꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂ
ꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢉ"ꢔꢕ#ꢈꢅꢛ! ꢗꢘꢙꢙꢚꢒꢛꢗꢗ ꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢉ$ꢑꢃꢈ! ꢘ%&ꢒ'&ꢒꢘꢒ( ꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢉ ꢁꢃꢇꢈ!ꢉ
ꢝ-ꢋꢈꢅꢉ"ꢑꢕꢈ!
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈꢇꢇꢋꢈꢌꢌꢉꢍꢈꢋꢃꢈꢅꢎꢉꢏꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢓꢔꢏꢏꢇꢈꢕꢈꢋꢃꢑꢇꢉꢖꢗꢗ
ꢍꢁꢃ+ꢉꢄ/ꢉꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈ
)UHG\ꢀ%RQLOOD
ꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉ"ꢑꢕꢈ! 1ꢋ2ꢈꢇꢈꢌꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉ3ꢋꢂꢛ
ꢍꢄꢋꢃꢑꢂꢃ!
)ꢐꢄꢋꢈ!
ꢍꢄꢋꢃꢑꢂꢃ!
)ꢐꢄꢋꢈ!
*ꢑ+ꢉ,-ꢄꢋ
ꢙ0ꢘꢛ%ꢚꢚꢛꢚꢗ(ꢚ ꢙꢗ.ꢛꢒ%ꢘꢛꢙ.(ꢙ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢍꢁꢄ-ꢇꢄ.ꢇꢂ(ꢁꢂꢑꢇꢆ
ꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢃꢄꢉ#ꢈꢉꢏꢈꢅ/ꢄꢅꢕꢈꢞꢉꢑꢌꢉꢏꢈꢅꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ4ꢁꢋꢑꢇꢉ$ꢈꢃꢑꢁꢇꢈꢞꢉꢓꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢄ/ꢉꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉ1ꢃꢃꢑꢂꢐꢈꢞꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢑꢌꢉꢏꢈꢅꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢃꢈꢅꢕꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢂꢄꢋꢞꢁꢃꢁꢄꢋꢌꢉꢄ/ꢉ ꢓꢄꢔꢅꢂꢈ-ꢈꢇꢇꢉ5637ꢍꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢉ"ꢄꢉꢍ189'8:;ꢘ08ꢗꢒ(ꢘꢒꢗ81ꢍ3ꢛꢉ
;ꢅꢁꢈ/ꢉꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢉ$ꢈꢌꢂꢅꢁꢏꢃꢁꢄꢋ!
1ꢉꢑꢇꢄꢁ(ꢄ.ꢇꢂ(ꢁꢂꢑꢌꢋꢐꢇ
/ꢉ0ꢎꢉꢆꢌꢍꢇꢆꢄꢏꢌꢑꢌꢊꢇ+
5ꢌꢃꢁꢕꢑꢃꢈꢞꢉꢓꢃꢑꢅꢃꢉ$ꢑꢃꢈ!ꢉꢉ
5ꢌꢃꢁꢕꢑꢃꢈꢞꢉꢍꢄꢕꢏꢇꢈꢃꢁꢄꢋꢉ$ꢑꢃꢈ!ꢉꢉ
,ꢊꢁꢇꢇꢉꢑꢏꢏꢇ+! ꢊꢁꢇꢇꢉꢋꢄꢃꢉꢑꢏꢏꢇ+!
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂꢄ2ꢉꢂꢑꢄ2ꢉ*ꢇꢆꢄ.ꢂꢉꢐꢇꢙꢄ3"45!#6ꢘ74
ꢝ-ꢋꢈꢅꢉ)ꢔꢅꢂꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢉ"ꢔꢕ#ꢈꢅ!ꢉꢉ
ꢚ88ꢂꢁ9ꢌ:+
$ꢑꢃꢈ ꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅ $ꢑꢃꢈꢍꢁꢃ+ꢉꢄ/ꢉꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈ
ꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢉꢓꢁ2ꢋꢑꢃꢔꢅꢈꢉ$ꢄꢂꢔꢕꢈꢋꢃ )ꢑ2ꢈꢉꢗꢉꢄ/ꢉꢗ
%&ꢒ'&ꢒꢘꢒ(

ꢏꢇꢍꢌꢉ:ꢇꢆꢄꢈꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢁ(ꢄꢀꢁꢂꢃ
1ꢁꢙ *ꢑ+ꢉ,-ꢄꢋ
1ꢋ2ꢈꢇꢈꢌꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉ3ꢋꢂꢛ
2ꢂꢁꢑꢙꢀ )UHG\ꢀ%RQLOOD
ꢍꢁꢃ+ꢉꢄ/ꢉꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈꢀ
ꢙ'(ꢉ)ꢐꢁꢇꢇꢁꢏꢌꢉ$ꢅꢁꢆꢈ ꢁꢂꢃꢂꢃꢀ&LYLFꢀ'U
9LFWRUYLOOHꢄꢀ&$ꢉ
ꢙ0ꢘꢛ%ꢚꢚꢛꢚꢗ(ꢚ
ꢍꢁꢃ+ꢉꢄ/ꢉ3ꢋꢞꢔꢌꢃꢅ+ꢎꢉꢍ1ꢉ%ꢗꢙ.'
ꢙꢗ.ꢛꢒ%ꢘꢛꢙ.(ꢙ
ꢏꢌꢍꢇꢄ.ꢂꢉꢋꢍꢇꢆꢙꢄ ꢓꢈꢏꢃꢈꢕ#ꢈꢅꢉꢒ'ꢎꢉꢒꢘꢒ(
ꢗꢘꢙꢙꢚꢒꢛꢗꢗꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂꢄꢗꢎꢑ-ꢇꢂꢙ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂꢄ1ꢉꢍ:ꢇꢙ
ꢂꢉꢇ(ꢄꢈꢐꢁ8ꢇꢙ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈꢇꢇꢋꢈꢌꢌꢉꢍꢈꢋꢃꢈꢅꢎꢉꢏꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢓꢔꢏꢏꢇꢈꢕꢈꢋꢃꢑꢇꢉꢖꢗꢗ
.ꢂꢇ:ꢉꢑꢉꢋꢌꢂ) ꢜꢇ9ꢉ+ꢇꢆ , 2ꢉꢋꢌ:
ꢐꢈꢉ/ꢄꢇꢇꢄ-ꢁꢋ2ꢉꢁꢃꢈꢕꢌꢉꢞꢈꢃꢑꢁꢇꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢌꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢄ/ꢉ-ꢄꢅꢜꢉꢑꢌꢉꢞꢁꢌꢂꢔꢌꢌꢈꢞꢉꢑꢃꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢌꢁꢃꢈꢛꢉ1ꢇꢇꢉꢅꢈ<ꢔꢁꢅꢈꢕꢈꢋꢃꢌꢉꢋꢈꢂꢈꢌꢌꢑꢅ+ꢉꢃꢄꢉꢑꢂꢂꢄꢕꢏꢇꢁꢌꢐꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ ꢁꢃꢈꢕꢌꢉꢌꢈꢃꢉ/ꢄꢅꢃꢐꢉ#ꢈꢇꢄ-ꢉꢌꢐꢑꢇꢇꢉ#ꢈꢉꢂꢄꢋꢌꢁꢞꢈꢅꢈꢞꢉꢏꢑꢅꢃꢉꢄ/ꢉꢃꢐꢁꢌꢉꢌꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢄ/ꢉ-ꢄꢅꢜꢛ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢅꢃꢇꢀꢀꢈꢄꢉꢄꢊꢋꢂꢈꢅꢌꢍꢎꢏꢅꢍꢎꢐꢄꢎꢅꢑꢒꢓꢆꢔꢆꢓꢕꢒꢒꢅꢖꢃꢌꢍꢅꢑꢒꢒꢗꢅꢃꢘꢍꢀꢄꢅꢍꢙꢅ ꢌꢍꢎꢏꢚ
3ꢛ ꢐꢈꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉꢌꢐꢑꢇꢇꢉꢏꢈꢅ/ꢄꢅꢕꢉꢌꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢄ/ꢉ-ꢄꢅꢜꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢌꢐꢑꢇꢇꢉꢏꢅꢄꢆꢁꢞꢈꢉꢑꢇꢇꢉꢇꢑ#ꢄꢅꢌꢎꢉꢕꢑꢃꢈꢅꢁꢑꢇꢌꢎ ꢈ<ꢔꢁꢏꢕꢈꢋꢃꢎꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢃꢄꢄꢇꢌꢉꢋꢈꢂꢈꢌꢌꢑꢅ+ꢉꢃꢄꢉꢂꢄꢕꢏꢇꢈꢃꢈꢉꢁꢋꢉꢑꢉ-ꢄꢅꢜꢕꢑꢋꢇꢁꢜꢈꢉꢕꢑꢋꢋꢈꢅꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉꢃꢐꢈ /ꢄꢇꢇꢄ-ꢁꢋ2=
ꢗꢛ )ꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢆꢑꢅꢁꢄꢔꢌꢉꢃꢅꢑꢞꢈꢌꢉꢂꢐꢑꢋ2ꢈꢉꢄꢅꢞꢈꢅꢌꢉꢏꢈꢅꢉꢑꢃꢃꢑꢂꢐꢈꢞꢉꢞꢄꢂꢔꢕꢈꢋꢃꢌ895ꢀ3ꢓ3ꢝ" ꢗ
ꢒꢛ ꢍꢅꢈꢞꢁꢃꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉ)ꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢞꢈ8ꢌꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢁꢃꢈꢕꢌꢉ8ꢉ5ꢀꢉꢍꢐꢑꢅ2ꢈꢅꢌꢎꢉꢊꢑꢌꢐꢈꢅꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉ$ꢅ+ꢈꢅꢌꢎ ꢍꢑ/ꢈꢉ'ꢉ5ꢇꢈꢂꢃꢅꢁꢂꢑꢇꢉ)ꢑꢋꢈꢇꢎꢉ4ꢅꢈꢋꢂꢐꢉ$ꢅꢑꢁꢋꢎꢉ(ꢉ9ꢁꢋ2ꢉ;ꢈꢋꢂꢐꢈꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉ5>ꢁꢌꢃꢁꢋ2ꢉ(0?ꢉꢌꢃꢄꢅꢕ ꢞꢅꢑꢁꢋꢉꢂꢄꢋꢂꢅꢈꢃꢈꢉꢏꢅꢄꢃꢈꢂꢃꢁꢄꢋ
33ꢛ 1ꢃꢃꢑꢂꢐꢕꢈꢋꢃꢌ!
ꢗꢛ ;ꢑꢂꢜꢔꢏꢉ$ꢄꢂꢔꢕꢈꢋꢃꢌ8943ꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉ"))ꢉꢊꢄꢅꢜꢌꢐꢈꢈꢃ
333ꢛ ꢍꢇꢑꢅꢁ/ꢁꢂꢑꢃꢁꢄꢋꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉ5>ꢂꢇꢔꢌꢁꢄꢋꢌ=
ꢗꢛ
ꢒꢛ
)ꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢗꢉꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢁꢌꢉꢈ>ꢂꢇꢔꢞꢈꢞ
ꢓꢊꢝꢉꢖꢗꢗꢉꢃꢁꢕꢈꢉꢁꢕꢏꢑꢂꢃꢉꢃꢄꢉ)ꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢂꢄꢋꢌꢃꢅꢔꢂꢃꢁꢄꢋꢉꢌꢂꢐꢈꢞꢔꢇꢈꢉꢁꢌꢉꢑꢋꢉꢑꢞꢞꢁꢃꢁꢄꢋꢑꢇ @ꢈꢅꢄꢉ-ꢄꢅꢜꢁꢋ2ꢉꢞꢑ+ꢌꢛ
ꢓꢔ#Aꢈꢂꢃꢉꢃꢄꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢃꢈꢅꢕꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢂꢄꢋꢞꢁꢃꢁꢄꢋꢌꢉꢄ/ꢉH],4&ꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢉꢖꢚꢛꢜꢝꢛꢞ !"ꢛ#$%!$#ꢛꢚꢖꢔꢛ ꢓꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢄ/ꢉꢊꢄꢅꢜ )ꢑ2ꢈꢉꢗꢉꢄ/ꢉꢒ
%&ꢒ'&ꢒꢘꢒ(

ꢏꢇꢍꢌꢉ:ꢇꢆꢄꢈꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢁ(ꢄꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢖꢁꢋꢍꢉꢋꢎꢇ+ꢘꢘ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂꢄꢗꢎꢑ-ꢇꢂꢙ ꢗꢘꢙꢙꢚꢒꢛꢗꢗ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂꢄ1ꢉꢍ:ꢇꢙ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈꢇꢇꢋꢈꢌꢌꢉꢍꢈꢋꢃꢈꢅꢎꢉꢏꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢓꢔꢏꢏꢇꢈꢕꢈꢋꢃꢑꢇꢉꢖꢗꢗ ꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅ $ꢑꢃꢈ
$ꢑꢃꢈꢍꢁꢃ+ꢉꢄ/ꢉꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈ
ꢓꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢄ/ꢉꢊꢄꢅꢜ )ꢑ2ꢈꢉꢒꢉꢄ/ꢉꢒ
%&ꢒ'&ꢒꢘꢒ(

ꢖꢁꢋꢍꢂꢌꢐꢍꢁꢂ;+ꢄ.ꢂꢉꢐꢇꢄ.ꢂꢁ8ꢁ+ꢌ:ꢄꢛꢄꢈꢎꢑꢑꢌꢂ)
ꢏꢌꢍꢇꢙ
ꢜꢇꢙ
ꢓꢈꢏꢃꢈꢕ#ꢈꢅꢉꢒ'ꢎꢉꢒꢘꢒ(
37ꢍꢉBꢑꢌꢃꢈꢅꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢉꢖ!
ꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢉꢖ!
ꢝ-ꢋꢈꢅꢉ)ꢝꢉꢖ!
ꢁꢃꢇꢈ!
ꢍ189'8:;ꢘ08ꢗꢒ(ꢘꢒꢗ81ꢍ3
ꢗꢘꢙꢙꢚꢒꢛꢗꢗ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈꢇꢇꢋꢈꢌꢌꢉꢍꢈꢋꢃꢈꢅꢎꢉꢏꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢓꢔꢏꢏꢇꢈꢕꢈꢋꢃꢑꢇꢉꢖꢗꢗ
1ꢋ2ꢈꢇꢈꢌꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉ3ꢋꢂꢛꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅ!ꢉ
)ꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢉꢀꢑꢇꢔꢈ! C0ꢙꢎꢘꢗ%ꢛꢚꢙ
.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛ ꢁꢋꢆꢄ2ꢇꢇ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄꢖ>ꢌꢋꢊꢇꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂ+ 3"5#%$ꢘ47
3$4ꢝ54"#ꢘ??
ꢛ3?5"6!ꢘ!"
.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖ>ꢌꢋꢊꢇꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ@ꢌꢂꢉꢁꢎ+ꢄ1ꢂꢌꢆꢇ+ꢄꢈꢐꢁ8ꢇꢛꢜꢒ@ꢔꢈꢔꢅꢗꢄ# .<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖꢂꢇꢆꢉꢍꢄ ꢁꢋꢆꢄ2ꢇꢇ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄꢏꢇꢛ+ꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢔꢍꢇꢑ+
.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖꢂꢇꢆꢉꢍꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ.>ꢌ+ꢇꢄ$ꢄꢏꢇꢛ+ꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢔꢍꢇꢑ+ ꢛ3$#%5#ꢝ?ꢘ7" .ꢂꢁ8ꢁ+ꢌ:ꢄ1ꢁꢍꢌ: 3"45!#6ꢘ74
ꢐꢁꢌꢇꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢉꢅꢈꢏꢅꢈꢌꢈꢋꢃꢌꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢂꢄꢅꢅꢈꢂꢃꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢏꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢛꢉꢉ1ꢋ+ꢉꢞꢁꢌꢂꢅꢈꢏꢑꢋꢂ+ꢉ#ꢈꢃ-ꢈꢈꢋꢉꢇꢁꢋꢈꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢌꢎꢉ ꢌꢔ#8ꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢏꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢉꢁꢌꢉꢞꢔꢈꢉꢃꢄꢉꢅꢄꢔꢋꢞꢁꢋ2ꢛ
1>ꢇꢄ.ꢇꢂꢐꢇꢋꢍꢌꢊꢇꢄꢁ(ꢄꢗ..ꢄꢁꢋꢄꢍ>ꢉ+ꢄ.ꢂꢁ8ꢁ+ꢌ:ꢙ ?#7ꢘ6?A
ꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅDꢌꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈꢉ)ꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢉ8ꢉꢓꢔꢕꢕꢑꢅ+ )ꢑ2ꢈꢉꢗꢉꢄ/ꢉꢗ
%&ꢒ'&ꢒꢘꢒ(

ꢖꢁꢋꢍꢂꢌꢐꢍꢁꢂ;+ꢄ.ꢂꢉꢐꢇꢄ.ꢂꢁ8ꢁ+ꢌ:ꢄꢛꢄꢏꢇꢍꢌꢉ:
ꢏꢌꢍꢇꢙ
ꢜꢇꢙ
ꢓꢈꢏꢃꢈꢕ#ꢈꢅꢉꢒ'ꢎꢉꢒꢘꢒ(
37ꢍꢉBꢑꢌꢃꢈꢅꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢉꢖ!
ꢊꢄꢅꢜꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢉꢖ!
ꢝ-ꢋꢈꢅꢉ)ꢝꢉꢖ!
ꢁꢃꢇꢈ!
ꢍ189'8:;ꢘ08ꢗꢒ(ꢘꢒꢗ81ꢍ3
ꢗꢘꢙꢙꢚꢒꢛꢗꢗ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈꢇꢇꢋꢈꢌꢌꢉꢍꢈꢋꢃꢈꢅꢎꢉꢏꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢓꢔꢏꢏꢇꢈꢕꢈꢋꢃꢑꢇꢉꢖꢗꢗ
1ꢋ2ꢈꢇꢈꢌꢉꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉ3ꢋꢂꢛꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅ!ꢉ
)ꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢉꢀꢑꢇꢔꢈ! C0ꢙꢎꢘꢗ%ꢛꢚꢙ
ꢈꢇꢐꢍꢘ ꢔꢍꢇꢑ 'ꢁꢆꢘ Dꢅ' ꢏꢇ+ꢐꢂꢉ8ꢍꢉꢁꢋ /ꢉꢋꢇꢄ1ꢁꢍꢌ:
/ꢌ-ꢁꢂ ꢒ0ꢎꢉ8ꢘ 'ꢌꢍꢇꢂꢉꢌ: Bꢒ*ꢐ:ꢎꢆꢇ+C
.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛ ꢁꢋꢆꢄ2ꢇꢇ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄꢖ>ꢌꢋꢊꢇꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂ+
ꢀ ꢘꢗꢉꢉꢒꢒꢉꢉꢉꢗ0ꢉꢉꢉꢘꢘꢉꢘꢘꢘꢒ 51 9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌꢉ-ꢁꢇꢇꢉ#ꢈꢉꢏꢑꢁꢞꢉꢃꢄꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢂꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉꢈꢇꢁ2ꢁ#ꢇꢈꢉ ꢂꢄꢌꢃꢌꢉꢑꢌꢉꢞꢁꢅꢈꢂꢃꢈꢞꢉ#+ꢉꢝ-ꢋꢈꢅꢛꢉꢉ3ꢋꢌꢈꢅꢃꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢑꢏꢏꢅꢄꢏꢅꢁꢑꢃꢈꢉ<ꢔꢑꢋꢃꢁꢃ+ꢉꢃꢄꢉꢑꢞAꢔꢌꢃꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ#ꢑꢌꢈꢉ ꢂꢄꢌꢃꢉꢃꢄꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢑꢂꢃꢔꢑꢇꢉ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢛꢉ3/ꢉꢃꢐꢈꢅꢈꢉꢑꢅꢈꢉꢕꢔꢇꢃꢁꢏꢇꢈꢉ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌꢎꢉ ꢇꢁꢌꢃꢉꢈꢑꢂꢐꢉꢄꢋꢈꢉꢌꢈꢏꢑꢅꢑꢃꢈꢇ+ꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢑꢞꢞꢉꢑꢉꢂꢄꢕꢕꢈꢋꢃꢉꢁꢋꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ?ꢋꢄꢃꢈ?ꢉ#ꢇꢄꢂꢜꢉꢃꢄꢉꢁꢞꢈꢋꢃꢁ/+ꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ 9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢉEꢈꢛ2ꢛꢉꢌꢁꢞꢈ-ꢑꢇꢜꢉꢂꢇꢄꢌꢔꢅꢈꢎꢉꢅꢄꢑꢞꢉꢂꢔꢃꢎꢉꢆꢑꢅꢁꢄꢔꢌꢉꢏꢈꢅꢕꢁꢃꢌꢎꢉꢈ>ꢃꢈꢋꢞꢈꢞꢉ -ꢑꢅꢅꢑꢋꢃ+ꢎꢉꢈ>ꢏꢈꢞꢁꢃꢈꢞꢉꢌꢐꢁꢏꢏꢁꢋ2ꢉꢂꢄꢌꢃꢌꢎꢉꢈꢃꢂꢛFꢛꢉ1ꢉꢂꢄꢏ+ꢉꢄ/ꢉꢈꢑꢂꢐꢉꢅꢈꢂꢈꢁꢏꢃꢉꢌꢐꢑꢇꢇꢉ#ꢈꢉ ꢌꢔ#ꢕꢁꢃꢃꢈꢞꢉ-ꢁꢃꢐꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈꢉ)ꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢛ
C0ꢎꢗ(ꢒꢛꢙꢚ
7ꢔꢑꢋꢃꢁꢃ+ Hꢋꢁꢃꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈ 4ꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅ ꢄꢃꢑꢇ
ꢉ0ꢎꢗ(ꢒꢛꢙꢚ3ꢋꢌꢃꢑꢇꢇꢑꢃꢁꢄꢋ G> >ꢉꢚꢎꢚꢙꢚꢛꢒ( ꢉꢗꢛꢘꢘ ꢉꢗꢛꢗꢘꢘꢘ
)I1ꢓ5ꢉꢒꢉꢓꢊꢝꢉꢖꢗꢗꢉ8ꢉ;ꢄꢋꢞꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉꢍꢐꢑꢋ2ꢈꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢌꢉꢂꢑꢇꢂꢔꢇꢑꢃꢈꢞꢉꢑꢃꢉꢒJꢉꢄ/ꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢉꢑꢕꢄꢔꢋꢃꢉꢄ/ꢉCꢒꢙ'ꢎꢙ0ꢗꢛ.. ꢈꢎ-ꢍꢁꢍꢌ:ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛ ꢁꢋꢆꢄ2ꢇꢇ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄꢖ>ꢌꢋꢊꢇꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂ+ 3"5#%$ꢘ47 .<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖ>ꢌꢋꢊꢇꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ@ꢌꢂꢉꢁꢎ+ꢄ1ꢂꢌꢆꢇ+ꢄꢈꢐꢁ8ꢇꢛꢜꢒ@ꢔꢈꢔꢅꢗꢄ# ꢁ ꢘꢗꢉꢉꢘꢘꢉꢉꢉꢘꢘꢉꢉꢉꢘꢘꢉꢒꢘꢘ% Kꢓ )ꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢀꢑꢅꢁꢄꢔꢌꢉꢍꢐꢑꢋ2ꢈꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢌꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉBꢔꢇꢃꢁꢏꢇꢈꢉ ꢅꢑꢞꢈꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢍꢅꢈꢞꢁꢃꢉꢓꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢏꢈꢅꢉ ;ꢑꢂꢜꢔꢏꢉ$ꢄꢂꢔꢕꢈꢋꢃꢌ89ꢈꢆꢁꢌꢁꢄꢋꢉꢗ
Cꢒꢙ'ꢎꢙ0ꢗꢛ..
7ꢔꢑꢋꢃꢁꢃ+ Hꢋꢁꢃꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈ 4ꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅ ꢄꢃꢑꢇ
ꢉꢒꢙ'ꢎꢙ0ꢗꢛ..ꢗ..ꢄ 3ꢋꢌꢃꢑꢇꢇꢑꢃꢁꢄꢋ G> >ꢉꢗꢛꢘꢘ ꢉꢒꢗ0ꢎꢒꢙ'ꢛꢚ0 ꢉꢗꢛꢒ''% )I1ꢓ5ꢉꢒꢉꢓꢊꢝꢉꢖꢗꢗ8ꢍꢐꢑꢋ2ꢈꢉꢝꢅꢞꢈꢅꢌꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉꢀꢑꢅꢁꢄꢔꢌꢉ ꢅꢑꢞꢈꢌꢉꢓꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉꢏꢈꢅꢉꢑꢃꢃꢑꢂꢐꢈꢞꢉ#ꢑꢂꢜꢔꢏꢉꢞꢄꢂꢔꢕꢈꢋꢃꢌ 895ꢀ3ꢓ3ꢝ"ꢉꢗꢉ L ꢝ 1Kꢉ1BꢝH" ꢉꢝ4ꢉCꢒꢗ0ꢎꢒꢙ'ꢛꢚ0M
ꢈꢎ-ꢍꢁꢍꢌ:ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖ>ꢌꢋꢊꢇꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ@ꢌꢂꢉꢁꢎ+ꢄ1ꢂꢌꢆꢇ+ꢄ ꢈꢐꢁ8ꢇꢛꢜꢒ@ꢔꢈꢔꢅꢗꢄ#
3$4ꢝ54"#ꢘ??
.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖꢂꢇꢆꢉꢍꢄ ꢁꢋꢆꢄ2ꢇꢇ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄꢏꢇꢛ+ꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢔꢍꢇꢑ+
ꢂ ꢘꢗꢉꢉꢒꢒꢉꢉꢉꢗ0ꢉꢉꢉꢘꢘꢉꢘꢘꢘꢒ 51 9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌꢉ-ꢁꢇꢇꢉ#ꢈꢉꢏꢑꢁꢞꢉꢃꢄꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢂꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉꢈꢇꢁ2ꢁ#ꢇꢈꢉ ꢂꢄꢌꢃꢌꢉꢑꢌꢉꢞꢁꢅꢈꢂꢃꢈꢞꢉ#+ꢉꢝ-ꢋꢈꢅꢛꢉꢉ3ꢋꢌꢈꢅꢃꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢑꢏꢏꢅꢄꢏꢅꢁꢑꢃꢈꢉ<ꢔꢑꢋꢃꢁꢃ+ꢉꢃꢄꢉꢑꢞAꢔꢌꢃꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ#ꢑꢌꢈꢉ ꢂꢄꢌꢃꢉꢃꢄꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢑꢂꢃꢔꢑꢇꢉ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢛꢉ3/ꢉꢃꢐꢈꢅꢈꢉꢑꢅꢈꢉꢕꢔꢇꢃꢁꢏꢇꢈꢉ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌꢎꢉ ꢇꢁꢌꢃꢉꢈꢑꢂꢐꢉꢄꢋꢈꢉꢌꢈꢏꢑꢅꢑꢃꢈꢇ+ꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢑꢞꢞꢉꢑꢉꢂꢄꢕꢕꢈꢋꢃꢉꢁꢋꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ?ꢋꢄꢃꢈ?ꢉ#ꢇꢄꢂꢜꢉꢃꢄꢉꢁꢞꢈꢋꢃꢁ/+ꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ 9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢉEꢈꢛ2ꢛꢉꢌꢁꢞꢈ-ꢑꢇꢜꢉꢂꢇꢄꢌꢔꢅꢈꢎꢉꢅꢄꢑꢞꢉꢂꢔꢃꢎꢉꢆꢑꢅꢁꢄꢔꢌꢉꢏꢈꢅꢕꢁꢃꢌꢎꢉꢈ>ꢃꢈꢋꢞꢈꢞꢉ -ꢑꢅꢅꢑꢋꢃ+ꢎꢉꢈ>ꢏꢈꢞꢁꢃꢈꢞꢉꢌꢐꢁꢏꢏꢁꢋ2ꢉꢂꢄꢌꢃꢌꢎꢉꢈꢃꢂꢛFꢛꢉ1ꢉꢂꢄꢏ+ꢉꢄ/ꢉꢈꢑꢂꢐꢉꢅꢈꢂꢈꢁꢏꢃꢉꢌꢐꢑꢇꢇꢉ#ꢈꢉ ꢌꢔ#ꢕꢁꢃꢃꢈꢞꢉ-ꢁꢃꢐꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈꢉ)ꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢛ
8C.ꢎ0%ꢘꢛꢘ0
7ꢔꢑꢋꢃꢁꢃ+ Hꢋꢁꢃꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈ 4ꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅ ꢄꢃꢑꢇ

8.ꢎ0%ꢘꢛꢘ03ꢋꢌꢃꢑꢇꢇꢑꢃꢁꢄꢋ G> >8.ꢎꢒ0(ꢛ0% ꢉꢗꢛꢘꢘ ꢉꢗꢛꢗꢘꢘꢘ
)I1ꢓ5ꢉꢒꢉꢓꢊꢝꢉꢖꢗꢗ8ꢍꢅꢈꢞꢁꢃꢉ;ꢄꢋꢞꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉ$ꢈ8ꢌꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉ3ꢃꢈꢕꢌꢉꢂꢑꢇꢂꢔꢇꢑꢃꢈꢞꢉꢑꢃꢉꢒJꢉꢄ/ꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢉꢑꢕꢄꢔꢋꢃꢉꢄ/ꢉCꢒꢗ(ꢎꢗ'.ꢛꢚ0ꢉGꢉ C.ꢎꢒ0(ꢛ0%
ꢈꢎ-ꢍꢁꢍꢌ:ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖꢂꢇꢆꢉꢍꢄ ꢁꢋꢆꢄ2ꢇꢇ+ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄꢏꢇꢛ+ꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢔꢍꢇꢑ+ .<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖꢂꢇꢆꢉꢍꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ.>ꢌ+ꢇꢄ$ꢄꢏꢇꢛ+ꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢔꢍꢇꢑ+
ꢛ3?5"6!ꢘ!"
ꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅDꢌꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈꢉ)ꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢉ8ꢉ$ꢈꢃꢑꢁꢇ )ꢑ2ꢈꢉꢗꢉꢄ/ꢉꢒ
%&ꢒ'&ꢒꢘꢒ(

ꢖꢁꢋꢍꢂꢌꢐꢍꢁꢂ;+ꢄ.ꢂꢉꢐꢇꢄ.ꢂꢁ8ꢁ+ꢌ:ꢄꢛꢄꢏꢇꢍꢌꢉ:ꢄꢖꢁꢋꢍꢉꢋꢎꢇ+ꢘꢘ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂꢄꢗꢎꢑ-ꢇꢂꢙ ꢗꢘꢙꢙꢚꢒꢛꢗꢗ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢂꢆꢇꢂꢄ1ꢉꢍ:ꢇꢙ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢁꢇꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈꢇꢇꢋꢈꢌꢌꢉꢍꢈꢋꢃꢈꢅꢎꢉꢏꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉꢓꢔꢏꢏꢇꢈꢕꢈꢋꢃꢑꢇꢉꢖꢗꢗ .<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖꢂꢇꢆꢉꢍꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ.>ꢌ+ꢇꢄ$ꢄꢏꢇꢛ+ꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢔꢍꢇꢑ+
ꢃ ꢘꢗꢉꢉꢒꢒꢉꢉꢉꢗ0ꢉꢉꢉꢘꢘꢉꢘꢘꢘꢒ 51 9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌꢉ-ꢁꢇꢇꢉ#ꢈꢉꢏꢑꢁꢞꢉꢃꢄꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢂꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉꢈꢇꢁ2ꢁ#ꢇꢈꢉ ꢂꢄꢌꢃꢌꢉꢑꢌꢉꢞꢁꢅꢈꢂꢃꢈꢞꢉ#+ꢉꢝ-ꢋꢈꢅꢛꢉꢉ3ꢋꢌꢈꢅꢃꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢑꢏꢏꢅꢄꢏꢅꢁꢑꢃꢈꢉ<ꢔꢑꢋꢃꢁꢃ+ꢉꢃꢄꢉꢑꢞAꢔꢌꢃꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ#ꢑꢌꢈꢉ ꢂꢄꢌꢃꢉꢃꢄꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢑꢂꢃꢔꢑꢇꢉ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢛꢉ3/ꢉꢃꢐꢈꢅꢈꢉꢑꢅꢈꢉꢕꢔꢇꢃꢁꢏꢇꢈꢉ9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢌꢎꢉ ꢇꢁꢌꢃꢉꢈꢑꢂꢐꢉꢄꢋꢈꢉꢌꢈꢏꢑꢅꢑꢃꢈꢇ+ꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢑꢞꢞꢉꢑꢉꢂꢄꢕꢕꢈꢋꢃꢉꢁꢋꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ?ꢋꢄꢃꢈ?ꢉ#ꢇꢄꢂꢜꢉꢃꢄꢉꢁꢞꢈꢋꢃꢁ/+ꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ 9ꢈꢁꢕ#ꢔꢅꢌꢑ#ꢇꢈꢉ4ꢈꢈꢉEꢈꢛ2ꢛꢉꢌꢁꢞꢈ-ꢑꢇꢜꢉꢂꢇꢄꢌꢔꢅꢈꢎꢉꢅꢄꢑꢞꢉꢂꢔꢃꢎꢉꢆꢑꢅꢁꢄꢔꢌꢉꢏꢈꢅꢕꢁꢃꢌꢎꢉꢈ>ꢃꢈꢋꢞꢈꢞꢉ -ꢑꢅꢅꢑꢋꢃ+ꢎꢉꢈ>ꢏꢈꢞꢁꢃꢈꢞꢉꢌꢐꢁꢏꢏꢁꢋ2ꢉꢂꢄꢌꢃꢌꢎꢉꢈꢃꢂꢛFꢛꢉ1ꢉꢂꢄꢏ+ꢉꢄ/ꢉꢈꢑꢂꢐꢉꢅꢈꢂꢈꢁꢏꢃꢉꢌꢐꢑꢇꢇꢉ#ꢈꢉ ꢌꢔ#ꢕꢁꢃꢃꢈꢞꢉ-ꢁꢃꢐꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈꢉ)ꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢛ
8Cꢒꢗ(ꢎꢗ'.ꢛꢚ0
7ꢔꢑꢋꢃꢁꢃ+ Hꢋꢁꢃꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈ 4ꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅ ꢄꢃꢑꢇ
8ꢒꢗ(ꢎꢗ'.ꢛꢚ03ꢋꢌꢃꢑꢇꢇꢑꢃꢁꢄꢋ G> >8ꢒꢗ(ꢎꢗ'.ꢛꢚ0 ꢉꢗꢛꢘꢘ ꢉꢗꢛꢘꢘꢘꢘ
)I1ꢓ5ꢉꢒꢉꢓꢊꢝꢉꢖꢗꢗ8ꢍ95$3 ꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉ)ꢐꢑꢌꢈꢉꢒꢉ$ꢈ8ꢌꢂꢄꢏꢈꢉ3ꢃꢈꢕꢌꢉ8ꢉ5ꢀꢉꢍꢐꢑꢅ2ꢈꢅꢎꢉ9ꢁꢋ2ꢉ;ꢈꢋꢂꢐꢈꢌꢎꢉꢊꢑꢌꢐꢈꢅꢌꢉNꢉ$ꢅ+ꢈꢅꢌꢎꢉ ꢍꢑ/ꢈꢃꢈꢅꢁꢑꢉ'ꢉ5ꢇꢈꢂꢃꢅꢁꢂꢑꢇꢉ)ꢑꢋꢈꢇꢎꢉ4ꢅꢈꢋꢂꢐꢉ$ꢅꢑꢁꢋꢉNꢉ5>ꢁꢌꢃꢁꢋ2ꢉ(0?ꢉꢓꢃꢄꢅꢕꢉ$ꢅꢑꢁꢋꢉꢍꢄꢋꢂꢅꢈꢃꢈꢉ)ꢅꢄꢃꢈꢂꢃꢁꢄꢋꢉL ꢝ 1Kꢉ1BꢝH" ꢉ ꢝ4ꢉCꢒꢗ(ꢎꢗ'.ꢛꢚ0M
ꢈꢎ-ꢍꢁꢍꢌ:ꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ.<ꢚꢈꢒꢄ$ꢄꢈꢀꢅꢄ=##ꢛꢖꢂꢇꢆꢉꢍꢄ(ꢁꢂꢄ.>ꢌ+ꢇꢄ$ꢄꢏꢇꢛ+ꢐꢁ8ꢇꢄꢔꢍꢇꢑ+ ꢛ3$#%5#ꢝ?ꢘ7" 3"45!#6ꢘ74.ꢂꢁ8ꢁ+ꢌ:ꢄ1ꢁꢍꢌ:
ꢐꢁꢌꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢉꢅꢈꢏꢅꢈꢌꢈꢋꢃꢌꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢂꢄꢅꢅꢈꢂꢃꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢉ/ꢄꢅꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢏꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢛꢉꢉ1ꢋ+ꢉꢞꢁꢌꢂꢅꢈꢏꢑꢋꢂ+ꢉ#ꢈꢃ-ꢈꢈꢋꢉꢇꢁꢋꢈꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢌꢎꢉ ꢌꢔ#8ꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢌꢉꢑꢋꢞꢉꢃꢐꢈꢉꢏꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢉꢃꢄꢃꢑꢇꢉꢁꢌꢉꢞꢔꢈꢉꢃꢄꢉꢅꢄꢔꢋꢞꢁꢋ2ꢛ
1>ꢇꢄ.ꢇꢂꢐꢇꢋꢍꢌꢊꢇꢄꢁ(ꢄꢗ..ꢄꢁꢋꢄꢍ>ꢉ+ꢄ.ꢂꢁ8ꢁ+ꢌ:ꢙ ?#7ꢘ6?A
ꢍꢄꢋꢃꢅꢑꢂꢃꢄꢅDꢌꢉ)ꢅꢁꢂꢈꢉ)ꢅꢄꢏꢄꢌꢑꢇꢉ8ꢉ$ꢈꢃꢑꢁꢇ )ꢑ2ꢈꢉꢒꢉꢄ/ꢉꢒ
%&ꢒ'&ꢒꢘꢒ(

ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢃꢆꢄꢇꢉꢊꢋꢌꢆꢋꢅꢍ
ꢘꢈꢆꢒꢉꢙꢇꢋꢅꢆꢒꢑꢕꢉ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢁꢄꢅꢄꢆ
ꢎꢄꢇꢏꢉꢐꢇꢑꢒꢇꢉꢖꢁꢗꢂꢒꢇꢕ
ꢎꢄꢇꢏꢉꢐꢇꢑꢒꢇꢉꢓꢋꢆꢔꢒꢕ
ꢚꢗꢄꢁꢅꢆꢕ
ꢂꢅꢝꢝꢃꢄꢞꢂꢂ
ꢇꢈꢉꢊꢋꢌꢍꢈꢎꢎꢏꢐꢑꢏꢎꢎꢒꢏꢓꢓꢐꢔꢏꢒꢊꢏꢌꢕꢐꢖꢗꢘꢓꢏꢐꢄꢐꢙꢚꢖꢖꢎꢏꢛꢏꢒꢊꢘꢎꢐꢜꢂꢂ
!ꢝꢕꢅꢂꢀꢞꢃꢝ
$ꢘꢛꢏꢐꢋ%ꢐꢔꢋꢒꢊꢌꢘꢉꢊꢋꢌ #ꢚꢊꢈꢏꢓ ꢔꢋꢒꢊꢌꢘꢉꢊꢋꢌꢓꢐ'ꢈꢉꢏꢒꢓꢏꢐꢜꢐ ꢐꢙꢊꢘꢊꢏꢐ#()ꢐꢜ &ꢛꢋꢚꢒꢊ ꢂ,ꢕ!ꢂꢂꢞꢅꢅ
ꢂꢂꢕ!ꢂꢝꢞꢅꢅ
ꢆ6ꢕ66ꢆꢞ6ꢝ
6ꢂꢕ,!ꢆꢞꢃ6
ꢆꢕꢄꢄꢅꢞꢅꢅ
"
ꢐꢄꢝꢞꢝꢝ
ꢐꢂꢝꢞꢆꢆ
ꢐꢃꢂꢞꢆꢀ
ꢐ!ꢄꢞ6!
ꢐ6ꢞ,ꢅ
ꢔꢗꢌꢈꢓꢊꢈꢘꢒ*ꢏꢎꢎꢏꢐ+ꢎꢏꢉꢊꢌꢈꢉꢕꢐ(ꢒꢉꢞ
ꢔꢋꢋꢎꢏ-ꢐꢔꢋꢒꢓꢊꢌꢚꢉꢊꢈꢋꢒꢐ(ꢒꢉ
#'&2ꢐ#)3ꢑ&''ꢐ($ꢔ
7ꢘꢓꢘꢐꢔꢋꢒꢊꢌꢘꢉꢊꢈꢒ/ꢕꢐ(ꢒꢉꢞ
770ꢐ+ꢒ/ꢈꢒꢏꢏꢌꢈꢒ/ꢕꢐ(ꢒꢉꢞ
+ꢎꢏꢉꢊꢌꢈꢉꢘꢎ
&ꢓꢖꢗꢘꢎꢊꢐ.ꢘꢍꢈꢒ/ꢕꢐ0ꢌꢘ1ꢈꢒ/
4ꢌꢘꢛꢈꢒ/ꢐꢘꢒ1ꢐ#ꢌ-5ꢘꢎꢎ
)ꢋꢋ%ꢈꢒ/
+ꢘꢌꢊꢗ5ꢋꢌ8ꢓ
ꢑꢏꢓꢊꢉꢋꢒꢐꢔꢋꢒꢓꢊꢌꢚꢉꢊꢈꢋꢒꢐꢙꢏꢌꢍꢈꢉꢏꢓꢕꢐ
(ꢒꢉꢞ
ꢔꢋꢒꢉꢌꢏꢊꢏ ꢄꢝꢕꢄ!ꢂꢞꢃꢅ ꢐ6ꢅꢞ!,
ꢑꢏꢓꢊꢏꢌꢒꢐ9ꢈꢎ%ꢈꢏꢎ1ꢓꢐꢙꢚꢖꢖꢎ-ꢐ #ꢏ5ꢘꢊꢏꢌꢈꢒ/ ꢝꢀꢕꢄ!ꢄꢞꢅꢃ ꢐꢂꢂ,ꢞꢄꢝ ꢔꢋꢛꢖꢘꢒ-ꢐ1*ꢘꢐ)ꢘꢈꢒꢐ4ꢋꢌꢐ)ꢏꢒꢊ
$ꢘꢛꢏ: ?ꢘ-ꢐ@5ꢋꢒ
ꢙꢏꢒꢈꢋꢌꢐ.ꢌꢋ>ꢏꢉꢊꢐ7ꢘꢒꢘ/ꢏꢌAꢈꢊꢎꢏ:
4ꢈꢌꢛꢐꢋꢌꢐꢔꢋꢌꢖꢋꢌꢘꢊꢏꢐ$ꢘꢛꢏ:
&11ꢌꢏꢓꢓ:
ꢏ;(<ꢔꢐ=ꢐ&ꢒ/ꢏꢎꢏꢓꢐꢔꢋꢒꢊꢌꢘꢉꢊꢋꢌꢓ
ꢕꢐꢕꢐꢐꢐ
Aꢏꢎꢏꢖꢗꢋꢒꢏꢐ$ꢚꢛ*ꢏꢌ:
ꢙꢈ/ꢒꢘꢊꢚꢌꢏ: #ꢘꢊꢏ:
ꢙꢚ*ꢉꢋꢒꢊꢌꢘꢉꢊꢋꢌꢐ'ꢈꢓꢊꢈꢒ/ .ꢘ/ꢏꢐꢂꢐꢋ%ꢐꢂ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢁꢄꢅꢄꢆꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢅꢇꢈꢉꢀꢊꢀꢋꢅꢄꢌꢈꢍꢎꢏꢐꢍꢌꢎꢋ

ꢐꢆꢑꢂꢊꢏꢒꢂꢆꢊꢓꢔꢈꢕꢆꢑꢖꢗꢊꢄꢘꢊꢁꢒꢄꢋꢈꢙꢆꢊꢚꢔꢛꢄꢄꢂ
ꢎꢏꢂꢄꢍ ꢀꢁꢜꢄꢜꢄꢁꢄꢝ
ꢌꢄꢍ ꢅꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢋꢄꢊꢈ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄ
ꢀꢁꢂꢂꢃꢄꢅꢀꢀ
ꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢋꢌꢇꢍꢍꢎꢏꢐꢎꢍꢍꢑꢎꢒꢒꢏꢓꢎꢑꢉꢎꢋꢔꢏꢕꢖꢗꢒꢎꢏꢄꢏꢘꢙꢕꢕꢍꢎꢚꢎꢑꢉꢗꢍꢏꢛꢀꢀ
%#ꢐꢀꢝꢉꢕ ꢝꢀ#$ &ꢉ$ ꢎ#%ꢐꢌꢝꢗꢀꢝꢉꢕ
ꢁꢀꢏꢏꢁꢁꢏꢏꢏꢁꢁꢏꢏꢏꢁꢁꢏꢄꢁꢁ/ .ꢘ "ꢖꢗꢒꢎꢏꢄꢏꢆꢗꢋꢇꢊꢙꢒꢏꢓꢖꢗꢑ#ꢎꢏ$ꢋ%ꢎꢋꢒꢏ&ꢊꢋꢏ'ꢙꢍꢉꢇꢕꢍꢎꢏ(ꢋꢗ%ꢎꢒꢏꢗꢑ%ꢏꢓꢋꢎ%ꢇꢉꢏꢘꢈꢊꢕꢎꢏ ꢕꢎꢋꢏ)ꢗꢈ*ꢙꢕꢏ+ꢊꢈꢙꢚꢎꢑꢉꢒ,-ꢎꢌꢇꢒꢇꢊꢑꢏꢀ
ꢝꢑꢔꢂꢏꢃꢃꢈꢗꢊꢁꢒꢄꢍ ꢏꢄꢀ ꢔꢄꢂ!ꢅꢃ ꢜ ꢝꢑꢔꢂꢏꢃꢃꢈꢞ ꢏꢑꢂꢁꢂ!ꢍ ꢏꢀꢅꢁꢁ "
ꢜ
"
ꢝꢑꢔꢂꢏꢃꢃꢈꢀꢆꢂꢏꢃꢍ ꢞꢄꢀ ꢔꢄꢂ!ꢅꢃ
'ꢏꢒꢂꢆꢊꢍ ꢏꢀꢅꢄ!!/
(ꢁꢑꢄꢈꢝꢂꢄ)ꢈꢀꢆꢂꢏꢃꢍ ꢞꢄꢂ!ꢔꢂ ꢀꢅ00
'ꢆꢊꢈꢙꢆꢊꢚꢈꢗꢄꢊ*ꢆꢊ)ꢄꢋꢈ+ꢁꢂꢛꢈꢂꢛꢄꢈꢐꢆꢑꢂꢊꢏꢒꢂꢆꢊꢓꢔꢈꢉ+ꢑꢈ'ꢆꢊꢒꢄꢔꢍ
1ꢅꢏ +ꢇꢋꢎꢈꢉꢏ.ꢗ2ꢊꢋꢏꢓꢊꢒꢉꢒꢏꢉꢖꢋꢊꢙ#ꢖꢏ3ꢊꢋꢎꢚꢗꢑꢏ.ꢎꢌꢎꢍ
4ꢓꢙꢋꢋꢎꢑꢉꢏ"ꢋꢎꢌꢗꢇꢍꢇꢑ#ꢏꢐꢗ#ꢎꢏ-ꢗꢉꢎꢏ5ꢏ"ꢙ2ꢍꢇꢒꢖꢎ%ꢏ3ꢋꢇꢑ#ꢎꢏ)ꢎꢑꢎ&ꢇꢉꢒ6 +ꢇꢋꢎꢈꢉꢏ'ꢗꢉꢎꢋꢇꢗꢍꢏꢓꢊꢒꢉꢒ 4ꢘꢙꢕꢕꢊꢋꢉꢎ%ꢏ27ꢏꢝꢏ8ꢙꢊꢉꢎꢒ69)ꢅꢏ
ꢓꢅ +ꢇꢋꢎꢈꢉꢏ:;ꢙꢇꢕꢚꢎꢑꢉꢏꢓꢊꢒꢉꢒ 43ꢊꢋꢏ:;ꢙꢇꢕꢚꢎꢑꢉꢏꢕꢉꢀꢏꢇꢑꢏꢉꢖꢎꢏꢓ(ꢓ6 (ꢊꢉꢗꢍꢏꢓꢊꢒꢉꢏ&ꢊꢋꢏꢘꢎꢍ&,ꢕꢎꢋ&ꢊꢋꢚꢏ<""ꢏꢐꢊꢋ*ꢏ(ꢗꢒ*ꢏ=ꢏ
415)5ꢓ6ꢏ>ꢏ<ꢊꢑ,"ꢋꢎꢕꢋꢇꢈꢎ%ꢏꢐꢊꢋ*ꢏ(ꢗꢒ*ꢏ1%?ꢙꢒꢉꢚꢎꢑꢉꢏ3ꢗꢈꢉꢊꢋ
,$ꢏꢂꢄꢊꢁꢏꢃꢈꢐꢆꢔꢂꢈꢞ ꢆꢂꢄꢔ
41ꢉꢉꢗꢈꢖꢏ;ꢙꢊꢉꢎꢒꢏ&ꢋꢊꢚꢏꢍꢇꢒꢉꢎ%ꢏꢒꢙꢕꢕꢍꢇꢎꢋꢒꢜꢒꢙ2ꢈꢊꢑꢉꢋꢗꢈꢉꢊꢋꢒꢅꢏ1ꢏ@ꢙꢒꢉꢇ&ꢇꢈꢗꢉꢇꢊꢑꢏ.ꢎꢉꢉꢎꢋꢏꢚꢙꢒꢉꢏ2ꢎꢏꢗꢉꢉꢗꢈꢖꢎ%ꢏꢇ&ꢏꢝꢏ;ꢙꢊꢉꢎꢒꢏꢗꢋꢎꢏꢑꢊꢉꢏ&ꢙꢋꢑꢇꢒꢖꢎ%ꢅ6 -.
/.

1. 0
0 0
'ꢆꢊꢈꢙꢆꢊꢚꢈꢗꢄꢊ*ꢆꢊ)ꢄꢋꢈ2!ꢈ% ꢇꢒꢆꢑꢂꢊꢏꢒꢂꢆꢊꢔꢍ
216,278.56Bꢅꢏ ꢘꢙ2ꢈꢊꢑꢉꢋꢗꢈꢉꢊꢋꢏꢏꢓꢊꢒꢉꢒ99
4ꢘꢙꢕꢕꢊꢋꢉꢎ%ꢏ27ꢏ8ꢙꢊꢉꢎꢒ6ꢏꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢂꢇꢈꢉꢊꢅꢋꢌꢅꢍꢂꢌꢅꢎꢏꢃꢐꢌꢅꢑꢒꢍꢌꢏꢌꢊꢅꢃꢒꢍꢇꢅꢎꢓꢔꢕꢑꢖꢗ ꢈ-./334Aꢅꢏ
Cꢅꢏ
ꢓꢊꢑꢉꢋꢗꢈꢉꢊꢋDꢒꢏ<ꢊꢑꢏ"ꢋꢎ,"ꢋꢇꢈꢎ%ꢏ1%?ꢙꢒꢉꢚꢎꢑꢉꢏ3ꢗꢈꢉꢊꢋ
278,761.44 (ꢊꢉꢗꢍꢏ"ꢋꢇꢈꢎꢏ&ꢊꢋꢏ<""ꢏCꢉꢎꢚꢒꢏ2ꢎꢇꢑ#ꢏ"ꢎꢋ&ꢊꢋꢚꢎ%ꢏ27ꢏꢘꢙ2ꢈꢊꢑꢉꢋꢗꢈꢉꢊꢋꢒꢏ=ꢏBꢏ>ꢏA ,,% ꢇꢒꢆꢑꢂꢊꢏꢒꢂꢆꢊꢈꢐꢆꢔꢂꢈꢞ ꢆꢂꢄꢔ
41ꢉꢉꢗꢈꢖꢏ;ꢙꢊꢉꢎꢒꢏ&ꢋꢊꢚꢏꢍꢇꢒꢉꢎ%ꢏꢒꢙꢕꢕꢍꢇꢎꢋꢒꢜꢒꢙ2ꢈꢊꢑꢉꢋꢗꢈꢉꢊꢋꢒꢅꢏ1ꢏ@ꢙꢒꢉꢇ&ꢇꢈꢗꢉꢇꢊꢑꢏ.ꢎꢉꢉꢎꢋꢏꢚꢙꢒꢉꢏ2ꢎꢏꢗꢉꢉꢗꢈꢖꢎ%ꢏꢇ&ꢏꢝꢏ;ꢙꢊꢉꢎꢒꢏꢗꢋꢎꢏꢑꢊꢉꢏ&ꢙꢋꢑꢇꢒꢖꢎ%ꢅ6 All sub cost broken down, attached 216,278.56-.
/.

1. 0
0 0
ꢐꢆꢑ5ꢄꢊꢂꢈꢂꢆꢈ&ꢑꢁꢂꢈꢗꢊꢁꢒꢄ
ꢕꢆꢑꢖꢗꢊꢄꢘꢊꢁꢒꢄꢋꢈꢙꢆꢊꢚꢔꢛꢄꢄꢂ ꢗꢏ6ꢄꢈ-ꢈꢆ*ꢈ11

6XSSOHPHQWDU\ꢀ:RUNꢀ2UGHUꢀꢎꢀꢄꢄꢀꢏꢀ3KDVHꢀꢃꢀ
3URMHFWꢀꢁ 9LFWRUYLOOHꢀ:HOOQHVVꢀ&HQWHUꢓꢀ3KDVHꢀꢌ
$GGUHVVꢀꢁ ꢄꢐꢈꢊꢌꢀꢄVWꢆꢀ6WUHHWꢀ9LFWRUYLOOHꢀꢆꢀꢈꢌꢇꢈꢉꢀ&$
ꢀ
1Rꢂꢀ
ꢄ
6XEFRQWUDFWRU
:HVWFRQ
'HVFULSWLRQꢀ
$GGLWLRQDOꢀ&RQFUHWHꢀDQGꢀ5HLQIRUFHPHQWꢀIRUꢀ7UDVKꢀ
(QFORVXUH
6XEꢀ$PRXQWꢀꢃꢀ
ꢃꢅꢆꢅꢇꢈꢂꢉꢊꢀ
1RWHVꢀ
3HUꢀ5),ꢀꢋꢀꢌꢅꢄ
ꢌ
ꢇ
:HVWFRQ
:HVWFRQ
7ꢍ0ꢀIRUꢀOLJKWꢀSROHꢀEDVHVꢀPDQXDOꢀH[FDYDWLRQ
Raising Pilaster CMU
ꢃꢄꢊꢆꢈꢇꢊꢂꢊꢊꢀ
ꢃꢎꢆꢉꢈꢌꢂꢊꢊꢀ
3HUꢀ5),ꢀꢋꢀꢌꢉꢉꢂꢄ
)LHOGꢀ:RUNꢀ'LUHFWLYHꢀ
ꢏ
ꢉ
ꢐ
5DLQꢀ)RUꢀ5HQW
00*
ꢃꢅꢈꢆꢌꢐꢌꢂꢊꢉꢀ
ꢃꢇꢆꢌꢌꢊꢂꢊꢊꢀ
ꢃꢏꢆꢈꢇꢊꢂꢄꢄꢀ
'HZDWHULQJꢀ:HOOꢀ6\VWHPꢀ5DLQꢀ)RUꢀ5HQWꢀ$IWHUꢀꢐꢊꢀ.ꢀ&UHGLWꢀ ([FDYDWRUꢀ2SHUDWRUꢀIRUꢀ/LIWꢀ6WDWLRQꢀ,QVWDOODWLRQ
$IWHUꢀꢐꢊ.ꢀ&UHGLWꢀ%XGJHW
7ꢍ0ꢀIRUꢀLQVWDOOLQJꢀERWWRPꢀꢀ
6KHHWꢀ0HWDO0DVD
0DVD
'/$%
,QVWDOOLQJꢀVKHHWꢀPHWDOꢀERWWRPꢀ0RGXODUꢀFRQQHFWLRQV
$GGLWLRQDOꢀSUHSꢀIRUꢀIRRWLQJꢀSHUꢀ5),ꢑ7ꢍ0ꢒ
T&M Works for opening ceiling and floors
ꢅ
ꢎ
ꢈ
ꢄꢊ
ꢄꢄ
ꢄꢌ
ꢃꢇꢐꢆꢈꢇꢇꢂꢏꢇꢀ
ꢃꢇꢏꢆꢏꢏꢇꢂꢏꢅꢀ
ꢃꢎꢄꢅꢂꢊꢊꢀ
ꢃꢄꢊꢆꢎꢊꢊꢂꢊꢊꢀ
ꢃꢉꢆꢐꢈꢈꢂꢊꢊꢀ
ꢃꢄꢌꢆꢈꢄꢌꢂꢊꢊꢀ
ꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢄꢇꢈꢉꢊꢋꢌ
ꢑꢃꢄꢐꢆꢎꢅꢈꢂꢊꢏꢒ
ꢑꢃꢉꢆꢅꢌꢐꢂꢇꢈꢒ
ꢑꢃꢌꢐꢆꢈꢐꢅꢂꢊꢄꢒ
ꢑꢃꢄꢐꢆꢇꢎꢇꢂꢈꢊꢒ
ꢑꢃꢅꢊꢆꢈꢉꢈꢂꢐꢏꢒ
ꢑꢃꢅꢐꢆꢌꢐꢎꢂꢉꢎꢒ
ꢀ3HUꢀ5),ꢀꢋꢀꢄꢇꢈ
3HUꢀ5),ꢀꢄꢉꢏꢂꢄꢀꢍꢀꢄꢉꢏꢂꢌ
&RROH\ꢀ&RQVWUXFWLRQ Grade Small patch in parking lot includes subbase &RROH\ꢀ&RQVWUXFWLRQ Additional Mobilization and Asphalt works &KULVWLDQEHOOH
&KULVWLDQEHOOH
Relocation of an Electric Vault near Bldg. 7
Lift station and GI Electric Connections

TOTAL CREDIT
3HUꢀ5),ꢀꢌꢎꢐ
ꢂꢃꢄꢋꢆꢃꢍꢇꢉꢊꢋꢀ
ꢄꢇ
ꢄꢏ
ꢄꢉ
ꢄꢐ
ꢄꢅ
ꢄꢎ
&KULVWLDQ%HOOH
$&,
EV Charger Credit Christianbelle
Removed Ring Benches, 3 ea.

Descoped Washers/Dryers
&$)(ꢀꢎꢀ(OHFWULFꢀ3DQHO
$&,
$&,
0$6$
00*
French Drain Credit from Masa
Existing 36'' Protection

1.Westcon Additional concrete and reinforcement for TE. 6/6/2023
RFCO #12- Add Concrete And Rebar To Trash Slab
Victorville Wellness Center
prepared for
Angeles Contractor, Inc.

Item
1 Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
On-Site:

Additional Concrete And Reinfocement To Change Trash
Slab To 6" PCC Section With #4 Rebar At 18" O.C.E.W. 1,346 SF $ 5.75 $ 7,739.50 TOTAL THIS CHANGE $ 7,739.50
Special Conditions:

Price is in addtion to current unit price.

Price DOES NOT include aggregate base.

PAYMENT 1 of 1 Revised: 6/6/2023 @ 3:48 PM

Subcontractor:

DATE:

Westcon Construction Services
6-Jun-23 PROJECT NO. (WBS)
PCO NO
2369A
#12PROJECT: Victorville Wellness Center VVWC Wellness Center DESCRIPTION: RFCO #12 ESTIMATOR Rafael R
Item
No.

Description Quantity Unit Material Labor (includes Fringe Benefits) Equipment Total Direct Cost
OH&P
15%
TOTAL
$
COR #1 Unit Price Total Hours Rate Total Name Qty Unit Unit Cost Total $ - $
$
$
$
- -
Cement Mason
Laborer
2 1
2 16
8 $
$
$

98.00 $
$
$
1,568.00
744.00
$ 1,568.00
744.00
235.20
111.60
235.20
$
$
$
1,803.20
855.60Labor To Pour Additional Concrete And
Install RebarA 93.00

98.00 $
$Iron Worker 16 1,568.00 1,568.00 1,803.20
C
D
Equipment
Add Rebar
Crew Truck 8 HR $ 43.00 $ 344.00 $ 344.00 $ 51.60 $ 395.60 450
10 Rebar, Tie Wire, Dobies

0.45 W/C
LBS
CY
$
$

1.35 $
$
606.00 $
$
606.00 $
$

90.90 $
$
696.90
Concrete 150.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 225.00 1,725.00
F Additonal Equipment- Pump
G Subsistence 40 $ 10.00 $ 400.00 $ 60.00 $ 460.00$ 400.00 TOTALS $ 7,739.50

VVWC 271 Detail report
RFI detail
#271 Trash Enclosure Clarification
Status Closed
Created on
Ball in court
answered
May 26, 2023 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
May 31, 2023 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Question
2n sheet 7 of 1ꢄ in the Precise *raGing Plans at the trash enclosure (see attacheG) the Ȋhatchingȋ shoZs Zhat appears to be a concrete section in the enclosure that comes out into the asphalt drive area. Please confirm that this is in fact concrete and provide what section is required, i.e. base/concrete thickness Official response
Use 6" Thk. Concrete with #4 Rebar @18" O.C over 8" Base.

Ayman Hanna (ACI) - May 31, 2023, 11:57 AM PDT
References
Files (1)
ȏ RFI # 271 Trash Enclosure Clarification.pdf
Impact
Cost impact Yes
YesSchedule impact
Other attributes
Priority High
Discipline -
CreateG E\ $\PaQ +aQQa ZitK $XtoGeVNp CoQVtrXFtioQ CloXGȠ oQ 0a\ ꢀ1ꢁ 2ꢂ2ꢀ at 11ꢃꢄꢅ $0 3D7 Page 1 of 3

VVWC 271 Detail report
Category -
-
-
-
Location
Location details
External id
Co-reviewer(s) Ali Nazari (Pacifica)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Cruz Baez (Pacifica)
Ed Herrera (Pacifica)
Jay Kwon (ACI)
Luis Diaz (Pacifica)
Myung Chung (CMC)
Nathan Williams (Pacifica)
Rick Hernandez (Pacifica)
Sal Diaz (Pacifica)
Sal Torres (Pacifica)
Scott Webb
Stephan Longoria
Steve Spooner (ACI)
Architect
Construction Manager
Contractor
Executive
Field Inspector
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Superintendent
ACI
CMC
Pacifica
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on May 31, 2023 at 11ꢃꢄꢅ AM PDT Page 2 of 3

VVWC 271 Detail report
Activities By At
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open Answered to Closed
Ayman
Hanna
May 31, 2023, 11:57
AM PDT
Ayman
Hanna
May 31, 2023, 11:57
AM PDTUse 6" Thk. Concrete with #4 Rebar @18" O.C over 8" Base.

Ayman Hanna Ayman
Hanna
May 31, 2023, 11:57
AM PDTchanged the status from Open Answered to Open Answered set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Myung Chung
changed the status from Open In Review to Open Answered Myung Chung
May 31, 2023, 11:51
AM PDTOfficial response: Use 6" Thk. Concrete with #4 Rebar @18" O.C over 8" Base.

Myung
Chung
May 31, 2023, 11:51
AM PDTUse 6" Thk. Concrete with #4 Rebar @18" O.C over 8" Base.

Cruz Baez May 30, 2023, 10:24
AM PDTchanged the status from Open In Review to Open In Review set Ball in court to Myung Chung (CMC).

Cruz Baez
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 271 Trash Enclosure Clarification.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
May 26, 2023, 10:01
AM PDT
Ayman Hanna (ACI) created this RFI in Closed status and set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Ayman
Hanna
May 26, 2023, 10:01
AM PDT
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on May 31, 2023 at 11ꢃꢄꢅ AM PDT Page 3 of 3

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 271Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive 05-26-2023
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Trash Enclosure Clarification.

Reference:

Drawing No:

Specification:

PGRD Plan sheet 7 of 15.

Ayman Hanna
Tel: (626) 405-0131
Fax:

Respond by: High priority Submitted by:

Questions or Clarification:

Please clarify,
On sheet 7 of 15 in the Precise Grading Plans at the trash enclosure (see attached) the “hatching” shows what appears to be a concrete section in the enclosure that comes out into the asphalt drive area.

Please confirm that this is in fact concrete and provide what section is required, i.e. base/concrete thickness.

URGENT, WORK IN PROGRESS.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Potential cost impact?
Response:

Potential schedule impact?Yes No Yes No
Response by:

Date:

.
2705.50
FL/HP
16 2705.2
FG
16 2704.60
TG-LP2704.70
TG-LP 2703.3
FG2706.0 FG
2705.17

FL/HPLIMITS OF

DISTURBANCE
2704.86
FL/HP2706.0 FG
APN 0478-041-26
N.A.P.
2706.67
FS2706.0 FG 2704.70
TG-LP2705.6 TW
2704.0 TF
2705.0
FG2706.0 FG 7" STEPS (2)
2705.50
2704.95
TG-LP 18 2704.60
TG-LPFS 2705.25
FS2705.6 TW
2704.0 TF 2704.2
FSBLDG 62706.0 FG 8 2705.6 TW
2704.0 TFFF = 2706.67
FG = 2705.5
PAD = 2704.0
2705.6 TW
2704.8 FG
16 2705.1
FS2705.50
FS
2704.31
FS
2706.0 FG 2705.92 TC
2705.42 FL
18 2705.43 FS
0" CURB
2705.69 FS
0" CURB
2706.67
FS
2706.67
FS
7" STEPS (2)
2704.70
FS
2705.80
RIM15
BLDG 78 2
FF = 2706.67
FG = 2705.5
PAD = 2704.0
8 2704.94
FS 2706.05 TC
2705.55 FS
2706.15 TC
2705.65 FS
2706.47 TC
2705.97 FS2705.70
FL/HP
2705.6 TW
2704.0 TF 2705.50
FS
4 2705.6 TW
2704.0 TF2706.0 FG 2704.25
TG
2706.39 TC/HP
2705.89 FS2705.47 TC
2704.97 FL
2705.81 TC
2705.31 FS
2706.65 TC
2706.15 FS 27
2706.67
FS
2706.20 TC
2705.70 FS
2704.69
FS 10CONSTRUCT TUBULAR STL 7" STEPS (2)
FENCE PER ARCHITECT PLANS 2705.50
FS 2705.6 TW 12705.5 FG 2705.75 TC
2705.25 FS
3 2704.0 TF 2706.44 TC
2705.94 FS16 8 2705.41 TC
2704.91 FLLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 18
4 2706.69
FS2705.66 TC
2705.16 FS2704.30
TG-LP 2706.25
FS 2706.47
FS2705.16
FS 2704.56 TC/LP
2704.06 FL
2704.61 TC
2704.11 FL
SEE DETAIL 'E'9
2705.5 FG HEREON 2705.59
FS
2705.50
FS
2705.80
TG
APN 0478-041-01
N.A.P.
2705.28
FS3
5 2705.11 TC
2704.61 FS
2704.78 TC
2704.28 FL
15 132704.50

FL/HP SEE DETAIL 'D'
HEREON
19 SEE DETAIL 'A'
HEREON
2705.61
FS
2704.97 TC
2704.47 FS
2704.30
FS12
2704.82 TC
2704.32 FL
2705.13 TC
2704.63 FS

SEE DETAIL 'C'
2705.79
FS2705.39 TC/GB
2704.89 FS2704.32 FS
GB
2704.28 FS
GB
1 115
HEREON
2703.61 TC
0" CURB
19 2705.38 TC
2704.88 FS2705.04 TC/GB
2704.54 FS
2705.67 TC2704.94 FS
GB2703.47 TC
0" CURB
2705.17 FS13
2705.67 TC
2705.17 FS
18 62704.47 FS
GB
2704.43 FS
GB
2704.50 FS
GB
2704.09 TC
2703.59 FL
(TYP.)
PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROP. ADA
STRIPING2703.47 TC
0" CURB
2703.80 FL
0" CURB
5 2704.32 TC
2703.82 FL
2705.43 TC
2704.93 FL
2705.62 TC
2705.12 FS
(2705.3 FG)
APN 0478-042-16
N.A.P.

2. Westcon, T&M for light pole bases manual
excavation

VVWC 255.1 Detail report
RFI detail
#255.1 Pole light locations
Status Closed
Created on
Ball in court
answered
Apr 17, 2023 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
May 2, 2023 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Question
While augering for the pole light locations as per the approved plan, hit the Storm Drain and Sewer lines for 5 sites as attached. please advise.

Official response
I agree with the Hand Drilling to avoid damaging the utility lines.

Move the light location away from the underground utility until the underground utility is cleared. Maintain a similar offset from adjacent hardscapes such as a sidewalk, fire lane, and building. See attached exhibit for the approximate distance and direction of relocation. Suggest a pothole at the new location to assure the underground utility has been cleared and no other conflict exists.

Ayman Hanna (ACI) - May 2, 2023, 9:31 AM PDT
References
Files (3)
ȏ RFI # 255 Pole light locations.pdf
ȏ RFI # 255 Pole light locations response 04192023.pdf
ȏ RFI # 255.1 Pole light locations.pdf
Impact
Cost impact Yes
YesSchedule impact
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on May 2, 2023 at ꢅ:34 AM PDT Page 1 of 5

VVWC 255.1 Detail report
Other attributes
Priority High
Discipline -
-
-
-
-
Category
Location
Location details
External id
Co-reviewer(s) Ali Nazari (Pacifica)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Cruz Baez (Pacifica)
Ed Herrera (Pacifica)
Jay Kwon (ACI)
Luis Diaz (Pacifica)
Myung Chung (CMC)
Nathan Williams (Pacifica)
Rick Hernandez (Pacifica)
Sal Diaz (Pacifica)
Sal Torres (Pacifica)
Scott Webb
Stephan Longoria
Steve Spooner (ACI)
Architect
Construction Manager
Contractor
Executive
Field Inspector
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Superintendent
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on May 2, 2023 at 9:34 AM PDT Page 2 of 5

VVWC 255.1 Detail report
ACI
CMC
Pacifica
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on May 2, 2023 at 9:34 AM PDT Page 3 of 5

VVWC 255.1 Detail report
Activities By At
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open Answered to Closed
Ayman
Hanna
May 2, 2023, 9:31 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna Ayman
Hanna
May 2, 2023, 9:31 AM
PDTchanged the status from Open Answered to Open Answered set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Myung Chung
changed the status from Open In Review to Open Answered Official response: I agree with the Hand Drilling to avoid damaging the utility lines. Move the light location away from the underground utility until the underground utility is cleared. Maintain a similar offset from adjacent hardscapes such as a sidewalk, fire lane, and building. See attached exhibit for the approximate distance and direction of relocation. Suggest a pothole at the new location to assure the underground utility has been cleared and no other conflict exists.

Myung
Chung
May 2, 2023, 9:12 AM
PDT
Myung
Chung
May 2, 2023, 9:12 AM
PDTI agree with the Hand Drilling to avoid damaging the utility lines.

Nathan Williams
changed the status from Open In Review to Open In Review set Ball in court to Myung Chung (CMC).

Nathan
Williams
Apr 20, 2023, 9:00 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 255.1 Pole light locations.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 2:30 PM
PDT
Ayman Hanna Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 2:30 PM
PDTchanged the status from Open Answered to Open In Review Ayman Hanna cleared due date
Per RFI # 255 response, Suggested a pothole to ensure that existing underground utilities do not get damaged. Potholing at this point would be equivalent to digging the lights by hand which was not figured in the original bid. The additional time would be 4 hrs for each light there are 45 lights still to be dug. How about suggesting they overlay plans and relocate light poles to avoid additional cost? Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 2:30 PM
PDT
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Closed to Open Answered
Ayman Hanna changed the ID to 255.1
Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 2:30 PM
PDT
Per RFI # 255 response, Suggested a pothole to ensure that existing underground utilities do not get damaged. Potholing at this point would be equivalent to digging the lights by hand which was not figured in the original bid. The additional time would be 4 hrs for each light there are 45 lights still to be dug. How about suggesting they overlay plans and relocate light poles to avoid additional cost? Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 2:30 PM
PDT
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on May 2, 2023 at 9:34 AM PDT Page 4 of 5

VVWC 255.1 Detail report
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open Answered to Closed
Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 6:44 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 6:43 AM
PDTchanged the status from Open Answered to Open Answered set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 255 Pole light locations response 04192023.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 6:43 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open In Review to Open Answered Official response: Move the light location away from the underground utility until the underground utility is cleared. Maintain a similar offset from adjacent hardscapes such as a sidewalk, fire lane, and building.

See attached exhibit for the approximate distance and direction of relocation. Suggest a pothole at the new location to assure the underground utility has been cleared and no other conflict exists.

Ayman
Hanna
Apr 19, 2023, 6:39 AM
PDT
Cruz Baez Apr 17, 2023, 3:03 PM
PDTchanged the status from Open In Review to Open In Review set Ball in court to Myung Chung (CMC).

Cruz Baez
Ayman Hanna changed the question to While augering for the pole light locations as per the approved plan, hit the Storm Drain and Sewer lines for 5 sites as attached. please advise.

Ayman
Hanna
Apr 17, 2023, 2:20 PM
PDT
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 255 Pole light locations.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Apr 17, 2023, 2:20 PM
PDT
Ayman Hanna (ACI) created this RFI in Closed status and set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Ayman
Hanna
Apr 17, 2023, 2:20 PM
PDT
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on May 2, 2023 at 9:34 AM PDT Page 5 of 5

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 255Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive 04-17-2023
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Pole light locations
Reference:

Drawing No:

Specification:

E Plan sheet # E-5P
Ayman Hanna
Tel: (626) 405-0131
Fax:

Respond by: High priority Submitted by:

Questions or Clarification:

Please clarify,
While augering for the pole light locations as per the approved plan, hit the Storm Drain and Sewer lines for 5 sites as attached. please advise.

URGENT, WORK IN PROGRESS.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Potential cost impact?
Response:

Potential schedule impact?Yes No Yes No
Response by:

Date:

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 255Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive 04-17-2023
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Pole light locations
Reference:

Drawing No:

Specification:

E Plan sheet # E-5P
Ayman Hanna
Tel: (626) 405-0131
Fax:

Respond by: High priority Submitted by:

Questions or Clarification:

Please clarify,
While augering for the pole light locations as per the approved plan, hit the Storm Drain and Sewer lines for 5 sites as attached. please advise.

URGENT, WORK IN PROGRESS.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Potential cost impact?
Response:

Potential schedule impact?Yes No Yes No
"David Bosman - KWC" Move light location away from underground utility until underground utility is cleared. Maintain similar offset from adjacent hardscape such as sidewalk, firelane, building. See attached exhibit for approximate distance and direction of relocation. Suggest to pothole at new location to assure underground utility has been cleared and no other conflicts exist.

David Bosman - KWCResponse by:

Date: 04-18-2023

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 255.1
04-19-2023
Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Pole light locations
Reference:

Drawing No:

Specification:

E Plan sheet # E-5P
Ayman Hanna
Tel: (626) 405-0131
Fax:

Respond by: High priority Submitted by:

Questions or Clarification:

Please clarify,
Per RFI # 255 response, Suggested a pothole to ensure that existing underground utilities do not get damaged.

Potholing at this point would be equivalent to digging the lights by hand which was not figured in the original bid.

The additional time would be 4 hrs for each light there are 45 lights still to be dug.

How about suggesting they overlay plans and relocate light poles to avoid additional cost? URGENT, WORK IN PROGRESS.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Potential cost impact?
Response:

Potential schedule impact?Yes No Yes No
Response by:

Date:

3. Westcon, Raising Pilaster CMU.

4. RAIN FOR RENT, Dewatering well system.
ꢕꢖꢍꢒꢑꢗꢔꢄꢜꢙꢗꢔꢀꢖꢜꢔꢄ"
ꢜꢞꢘꢔꢙꢒꢑꢀ
ꢓꢗꢛꢙꢓꢜꢑ" ꢓꢗꢛꢙꢓꢜꢑꢄꢝꢖꢔꢑ ꢕꢙꢄꢆꢇꢄ ꢙ!"
ꢝꢞꢑ
ꢏ(.ꢝ-ꢝꢗꢃꢎ+(,ꢋꢏꢎ,+ꢋꢃ'(ꢎ
ꢃꢙ"ꢛꢐꢑꢂꢀ ꢙꢜꢙꢓꢜꢑꢂꢑꢛ ꢑꢛꢀꢐꢏꢙꢚꢙꢁ ꢑꢜꢙꢀꢜꢑꢂꢑꢛ
ꢜꢞꢘꢔꢙꢒꢑꢀꢄ" ꢙꢁꢙꢛꢐꢑ ꢕ#ꢑꢖꢘꢑꢄꢕꢖꢍ :"ꢑ/ꢓꢀꢒ$ꢙ"ꢃ
ꢗꢖꢒꢑ ꢏ(.ꢝ-ꢝꢗꢃꢎ+(,ꢋꢏꢎ,+ꢋꢃ'(ꢎ
ꢗ0'))ꢝ1ꢃ,+ꢃ2+3ꢗ',ꢝ4
ꢖꢝꢝꢀꢑꢘꢘ ꢓ"ꢛꢃ)0'--')ꢗꢃ1ꢋꢃ ꢗꢖꢒꢑ ꢏ(.ꢝ-ꢝꢗꢃꢎ+(,ꢋꢏꢎ,+ꢋꢃ'(ꢎ
ꢎꢅꢖ!ꢃ'ꢕꢌ5ꢆꢖꢊ!ꢃꢎꢏꢃꢐꢙꢓꢁ" ꢖꢝꢝꢀꢑꢘꢘ 6'ꢎ,+ꢋ6'--ꢝꢃ7ꢝ--(ꢝꢗꢗꢃꢎꢝ(,ꢝꢋꢃ )0ꢏꢗꢝꢃꢑꢃ
)ꢊ&8ꢃꢑꢛꢀꢐꢘꢙꢃ
ꢙꢀꢐꢂꢑꢃꢄꢅꢊꢆꢖꢃꢗꢖꢃ
6ꢅꢇꢖ&ꢊꢍꢅ99ꢉꢃꢎꢏꢃꢐꢑꢛꢐꢒ
ꢕ$ꢙꢗꢑ ꢀꢑꢀꢐꢑꢛꢛ"ꢂꢂꢕ$ꢙꢗꢑ ꢀꢑꢀꢐꢑꢛꢛ"ꢂꢂ
ꢗꢆꢉꢈꢋꢚꢃ
)-ꢝꢏꢗꢝꢃꢋꢝꢄꢝꢋꢃ,+ꢃꢝꢗ,';ꢏ,ꢝꢃꢑꢂꢁ"ꢛꢀꢓ$
'(6+'ꢎꢝꢃ'(ꢎ-ꢔ1ꢝꢗꢃ,0ꢝꢃꢄ+--+7'(.4
ꢋꢝ(,ꢏ-ꢃꢙꢃꢎ<ꢎ-ꢝ4ꢃꢃ:ꢑꢙ/ꢒꢁꢒ$ꢙꢙ
ꢝ(6'ꢋ+(;ꢝ(,ꢏ-ꢃꢄꢝꢝ4ꢃꢃ:ꢓꢂꢂ$ꢑꢙ
ꢏ=ꢃꢄꢝꢝ>ꢃꢃ:ꢙꢒꢙ$ꢑꢓ
ꢗꢏ-ꢝꢗ4ꢃꢃ:ꢓ/ꢐꢓꢙ$ꢓꢒ
1ꢝ-'6ꢝꢋ<4ꢃꢃ:ꢒ/ꢁꢓꢛ$ꢒꢀ
'(ꢗ,ꢏ--4ꢃꢃ:ꢑꢀ/ꢛꢒꢑ$ꢂꢂ
ꢋꢝ;+6ꢏ-4ꢃꢃ:ꢙꢙ/ꢐꢐꢀ$"ꢂ
)'ꢎ?ꢃꢔ)4ꢃꢃ:ꢒ/ꢁꢓꢛ$ꢒꢀ
,ꢏ@4ꢃꢃ:ꢛ/ꢙꢂꢂ$ꢐꢑ
ꢑꢗꢛꢓꢀꢙꢗꢒꢑꢗꢔꢖ#ꢄꢅꢑꢑꢚ
ꢖ%ꢄꢅꢑꢑꢚ
:ꢓꢂꢂ$ꢑꢙꢃ
:ꢙꢒꢙ$ꢑꢓꢃ
ꢔꢙꢔꢖ#ꢄꢘꢖ#ꢑꢘꢚ :ꢓ/"ꢐꢑ$ꢑꢒꢃ
ꢔꢙꢔꢖ#ꢄꢀꢑꢗꢔꢖ#ꢘꢚ :ꢑꢙ/ꢒꢁꢒ$ꢙꢙꢃ
ꢔꢙꢔꢖ#ꢄꢘꢑꢀꢛꢓꢜꢑꢘꢚ
ꢔꢙꢔꢖ#ꢄꢙꢔ$ꢑꢀꢚ
ꢘꢞ!ꢔꢙꢔꢖ#ꢚ
ꢔꢖ&ꢚ
:ꢁꢐ/ꢑꢐꢒ$ꢐꢑꢃ
:ꢓꢐ$ꢒꢂꢃ
:ꢓꢐ/ꢀꢀꢁ$ꢑꢀꢃ
:ꢛ/ꢙꢂꢂ$ꢐꢑꢃ
ꢄ+ꢋꢃ)ꢋ+)ꢝꢋꢃꢎꢋꢝ1',/ꢃ)-ꢝꢏꢗꢝꢃ'(ꢎ-ꢔ1ꢝꢃ'(6+'ꢎꢝꢃ(ꢔ;3ꢝꢋꢃ+(ꢃ<+ꢔꢋꢃ)ꢏ<;ꢝ(,$ ꢃ)ꢏꢗ,ꢃ1ꢔꢝꢃꢏ;+ꢔ(,ꢗꢃꢏꢋꢝꢃꢗꢔ32ꢝꢎ,ꢃ,+ꢃꢏꢃꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢃꢎ0ꢏꢋ.ꢝꢃ+ꢄꢃꢙ$ꢒꢂA ꢃꢎꢔꢗ,+;ꢝꢋ/ꢃBꢋꢝ(,ꢝꢝꢃ+ꢋꢃ3ꢔ<ꢝꢋꢃꢘꢆꢃꢇ&ꢕꢖꢉCꢖꢃꢊꢉD5ꢅꢊꢉꢆE/ꢃꢆꢈꢘ99ꢃFꢉꢃꢌꢉꢉꢞꢉꢌꢃꢖ&ꢃꢘꢇꢇꢉGꢖ ꢃꢘ99ꢃꢖꢉꢊꢞꢆ/ꢃꢇ&ꢕꢌꢅꢖꢅ&ꢕꢆꢃꢘꢕꢌꢃGꢊ&ꢍꢅꢆꢅ&ꢕꢆꢃꢈꢉꢊꢉ&%ꢃ5G&ꢕꢃꢉCꢉꢇ5ꢖꢅ&ꢕꢃ&%ꢃꢖꢈꢅꢆꢃꢘ ꢊꢉꢉꢞꢉꢕꢖ> ꢃ&ꢊꢌꢉꢊꢅꢕ >ꢃ&ꢊꢃꢌꢉ9ꢅꢍꢉꢊ!ꢃ&%ꢃꢉD5ꢅGꢞꢉꢕꢖꢃꢖ&ꢃꢇ5ꢆꢖ&ꢞꢉꢊ/ꢃ#ꢈꢅꢇꢈꢉꢍꢉꢊꢃꢇ&ꢞꢉꢆꢃ%ꢅꢊꢆꢖ$ ꢔꢙꢔꢖ#ꢚ :"ꢑ/ꢓꢀꢒ$ꢙ"ꢃ
ꢕꢖꢍꢒꢑꢗꢔꢄꢔꢑꢀꢒꢘꢚꢃꢃ(ꢝ,ꢃꢛꢂ
ꢗ'.(ꢏ,ꢔꢋꢝ4ꢃHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHꢃ1ꢏ,ꢝ4ꢃHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

ꢍꢆꢎꢇꢄꢋꢁꢏꢈꢋꢄꢐꢈꢇꢋꢆꢃꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢄꢀꢈꢃꢉꢄꢀꢂꢊꢈꢇꢋꢂꢌꢈ
ꢀꢁꢂꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢃꢋꢌꢃ
ꢋꢅꢍꢉꢊꢆꢅꢌꢉꢃꢎꢏꢃꢐꢑꢒꢂꢓꢃ
ꢔꢕꢅꢖꢉꢌꢃꢗꢖꢘꢖꢉꢆ
ꢀꢑꢒꢓꢔꢄꢕꢖꢍꢒꢑꢗꢔꢘꢄꢔꢙꢚ
ꢓꢗꢛꢙꢓꢜꢑ
ꢝꢄꢋꢏ'(ꢃꢝꢗ)ꢏꢋ*ꢏ ꢋꢘꢅꢕꢃ%&ꢊꢃꢋꢉꢕꢖ
ꢋꢏ'(ꢃꢄ+ꢋꢃꢋꢝ(,
ꢄ'-ꢝꢃꢒꢑꢒꢁꢙꢐꢒꢙꢚꢀꢒꢛꢚꢑꢙꢓꢙ
-+ꢗꢃꢏ(.ꢝ-ꢝꢗ/ꢃꢎꢏꢃꢐꢂꢂꢓꢁꢚꢑꢒꢁꢙ
ꢑꢁꢜꢓꢃꢝꢞꢉꢊ ꢉꢕꢇ!ꢃ"ꢂꢂꢚꢓꢁꢑꢚꢓꢑꢁꢀ
###$ꢊꢘꢅꢕ%&ꢊꢊꢉꢕꢖ$ꢇ&ꢞ
ꢕꢖꢍꢒꢑꢗꢔꢄꢜꢙꢗꢔꢀꢖꢜꢔꢄ"
ꢜꢞꢘꢔꢙꢒꢑꢀ
ꢓꢗꢛꢙꢓꢜꢑ" ꢓꢗꢛꢙꢓꢜꢑꢄꢝꢖꢔꢑ ꢕꢙꢄꢆꢇꢄ ꢙ!"
ꢝꢞꢑ
ꢏ(.ꢝ-ꢝꢗꢃꢎ+(,ꢋꢏꢎ,+ꢋꢃ'(ꢎ
ꢃꢙ"ꢛꢐꢑꢛ" ꢙꢜꢙꢓꢜꢑꢂꢑꢛ ꢑꢛꢒꢐꢏꢙꢚꢙꢁ ꢑꢜꢙꢀꢜꢑꢂꢑꢛ
ꢜꢞꢘꢔꢙꢒꢑꢀꢄ" ꢙꢁꢙꢛꢐꢑ ꢕ#ꢑꢖꢘꢑꢄꢕꢖꢍ :"/ꢙꢀꢁ$ꢙ"ꢃ
ꢗꢖꢒꢑ ꢏ(.ꢝ-ꢝꢗꢃꢎ+(,ꢋꢏꢎ,+ꢋꢃ'(ꢎ
ꢗ0'))ꢝ1ꢃ,+ꢃ2+3ꢗ',ꢝ4
ꢖꢝꢝꢀꢑꢘꢘ ꢓ"ꢛꢃ)0'--')ꢗꢃ1ꢋꢃ ꢗꢖꢒꢑ ꢏ(.ꢝ-ꢝꢗꢃꢎ+(,ꢋꢏꢎ,+ꢋꢃ'(ꢎ
ꢎꢅꢖ!ꢃ'ꢕꢌ5ꢆꢖꢊ!ꢃꢎꢏꢃꢐꢙꢓꢁ" ꢖꢝꢝꢀꢑꢘꢘ 6'ꢎ,+ꢋ6'--ꢝꢃ7ꢝ--(ꢝꢗꢗꢃꢎꢝ(,ꢝꢋꢃ )0ꢏꢗꢝꢃꢑꢃ
)ꢊ&8ꢃꢑꢛꢀꢐꢘꢙꢃ
ꢙꢀꢐꢂꢑꢃꢄꢅꢊꢆꢖꢃꢗꢖꢃ
6ꢅꢇꢖ&ꢊꢍꢅ99ꢉꢃꢎꢏꢃꢐꢑꢛꢐꢒ
ꢕ$ꢙꢗꢑ ꢀꢑꢀꢐꢑꢛꢛ"ꢂꢂꢕ$ꢙꢗꢑ ꢀꢑꢀꢐꢑꢛꢛ"ꢂꢂ
ꢗꢆꢉꢈꢋꢚꢃ
)-ꢝꢏꢗꢝꢃꢋꢝꢄꢝꢋꢃ,+ꢃꢎ0ꢏ(.ꢝꢃ+ꢋ1ꢝꢋꢃꢑꢂꢁ"ꢛꢀꢓꢚꢂꢂꢙ$
'(6+'ꢎꢝꢃꢄ+ꢋꢃꢄꢔꢝ-ꢃꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
%ꢔꢍ ꢞꢙꢒ ꢝꢑꢘꢜꢀꢓꢕꢔꢓꢙꢗ ꢕꢀꢙꢝꢞꢜꢔꢄ" ꢘꢔꢖꢔꢞꢘ ꢝꢖꢔꢑ
ꢙꢞꢔ
!ꢓ##ꢑꢝ
ꢔ$ꢀꢞ
ꢝꢖꢍꢘ ꢕꢀꢓꢜꢑ ꢖꢒꢙꢞꢗꢔ ꢔꢖ&ꢖ!#ꢑ
!ꢓ##ꢑꢝ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ ꢝꢏ 0ꢘ59ꢅꢕ ꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ
7ꢉꢉ<ꢉꢕꢌꢃ1ꢉ9ꢅꢍꢉꢊ!ꢃ=ꢄ5ꢉ9>
ꢙꢑꢜꢙꢂꢜꢑꢑ
ꢋ3ꢃ0ꢏꢔ-'(. ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
:ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙ :ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙꢃ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ ꢝꢏ ꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢆꢃ?ꢋꢉ 59ꢘꢖ&ꢊ!ꢃꢄꢉꢉꢃ@ꢃ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗ5ꢊꢇꢈꢘꢊ ꢉ
ꢋ3ꢃꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ :ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁ :ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁꢃ
ꢙꢑꢜꢙꢂꢜꢑꢑ?
ꢃꢒꢛ$ꢛꢂ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ1!ꢉꢌꢃ1ꢅꢉꢆꢉ9ꢃ
Aꢑ
ꢋ3ꢃꢄꢔꢝ-ꢃ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
:ꢀ$ꢛꢙ :ꢛꢛꢀ$ꢛꢑꢃ
:ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙꢃ0ꢘ59ꢅꢕ ꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ7ꢉꢉ<ꢉꢕꢌꢃ1ꢉ9ꢅꢍꢉꢊ!ꢃ ꢋ3ꢃ0ꢏꢔ-'(. :ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙ =ꢄ5ꢉ9>
ꢙꢑꢜꢙꢓꢜꢑꢑ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢁꢒ$ꢙꢂ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢆꢃꢋꢉ 59ꢘꢖ&ꢊ!ꢃꢄꢉꢉꢃ@ꢃ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗ5ꢊꢇꢈꢘꢊ ꢉ
ꢋ3ꢃꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁ
:ꢀ$ꢛꢙ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁꢃ
:ꢑ"ꢁ$ꢒ"ꢃ
:ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙꢃ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ1!ꢉꢌꢃ1ꢅꢉꢆꢉ9ꢃ
Aꢑ
ꢋ3ꢃꢄꢔꢝ-ꢃ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝ
0ꢘ59ꢅꢕ ꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ0&9ꢅꢌꢘ!ꢃ1ꢉ9ꢅꢍꢉꢊ!ꢃ ꢋ3ꢃ0ꢏꢔ-'(. :ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙ =ꢄ5ꢉ9>
ꢙꢑꢜꢑꢁꢜꢑꢑ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢛꢛ$ꢐꢂ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢝꢏ
ꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢆꢃꢋꢉ 59ꢘꢖ&ꢊ!ꢃꢄꢉꢉꢃ@ꢃ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗ5ꢊꢇꢈꢘꢊ ꢉ
ꢋ3ꢃꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
ꢃꢂ$ꢂꢂ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁ
:ꢀ$ꢛꢙ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁꢃ
:ꢑꢙꢛ$ꢐꢙꢃ
:ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙꢃ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁꢃ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ1!ꢉꢌꢃ1ꢅꢉꢆꢉ9ꢃ
Aꢑ
ꢋ3ꢃꢄꢔꢝ-ꢃ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝ
0ꢘ59ꢅꢕ ꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ0&9ꢅꢌꢘ!ꢃ1ꢉ9ꢅꢍꢉꢊ!ꢃ
=ꢄ5ꢉ9>
ꢋ3ꢃ0ꢏꢔ-'(. :ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁ
:ꢀ$ꢛꢙ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ ꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢆꢃꢋꢉ 59ꢘꢖ&ꢊ!ꢃꢄꢉꢉꢃ@ꢃ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗ5ꢊꢇꢈꢘꢊ ꢉ
ꢋ3ꢃꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢃꢙꢑ"$ꢛꢂ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ1!ꢉꢌꢃ1ꢅꢉꢆꢉ9ꢃ
Aꢑ
ꢋ3ꢃꢄꢔꢝ-ꢃ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝ
:"ꢂꢐ$ꢒꢓꢃ
:ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙꢃ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢁꢙꢃ
0ꢘ59ꢅꢕ ꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ0&9ꢅꢌꢘ!ꢃ1ꢉ9ꢅꢍꢉꢊ!ꢃ
=ꢄ5ꢉ9>ꢃꢙꢜꢙꢜꢑꢛ
ꢋ3ꢃ0ꢏꢔ-'(. :ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢁꢙ
:ꢀ$ꢛꢙ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ ꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢆꢃꢋꢉ 59ꢘꢖ&ꢊ!ꢃꢄꢉꢉꢃ@ꢃ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗ5ꢊꢇꢈꢘꢊ ꢉ
ꢋ3ꢃꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢃꢙꢓꢁ$ꢓꢂ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ1!ꢉꢌꢃ1ꢅꢉꢆꢉ9ꢃ
Aꢑ
ꢋ3ꢃꢄꢔꢝ-ꢃ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝ
:ꢙ/ꢙꢂꢑ$ꢛꢀꢃ
:ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙꢃ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁꢃ
0ꢘ59ꢅꢕ ꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ?7ꢉꢉ<ꢉꢕꢌꢃ1ꢉ9ꢅꢍꢉꢊ!ꢃ
=ꢄ5ꢉ9>ꢃꢙꢜꢓꢜꢑꢛ
ꢋ3ꢃ0ꢏꢔ-'(. :ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙ
:ꢛꢁ$ꢙꢁ
:ꢀ$ꢛꢙ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ ꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢆꢃꢋꢉ 59ꢘꢖ&ꢊ!ꢃꢄꢉꢉꢃ@ꢃ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗ5ꢊꢇꢈꢘꢊ ꢉ
ꢋ3ꢃꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝꢗ
ꢃꢙꢐꢛ$ꢑꢂ
ꢃꢙ$ꢂꢂ
ꢄ5ꢉ9ꢃꢗꢉꢊꢍꢅꢇꢉꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ1!ꢉꢌꢃ1ꢅꢉꢆꢉ9ꢃ
Aꢑ
ꢋ3ꢃꢄꢔꢝ-ꢃ
ꢗꢝꢋ6'ꢎꢝ
:ꢙ/ꢑꢙꢐ$ꢂꢐꢃ
:ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙꢃ0ꢘ59ꢅꢕ ꢃꢋꢉ;ꢅ99ꢘ;9ꢉꢃ?7ꢉꢉ<ꢉꢕꢌꢃ1ꢉ9ꢅꢍꢉꢊ!ꢃ
=ꢄ5ꢉ9>ꢃꢙꢜ"ꢜꢑꢂꢑꢛ
ꢋ3ꢃ0ꢏꢔ-'(. :ꢑ"ꢒ$ꢓꢙ
)ꢊꢅꢕꢖꢉꢌꢃ1ꢘꢖꢉ4ꢃꢑꢜꢙꢒꢜꢑꢂꢑꢛ )ꢘ ꢉꢃꢙꢃ&%ꢃꢑ

5. MMG, Excavator Operator

G E N E R A L E N G I N E E R I N G C O N T R A C T O R Lic. No 1088006 A
January 16, 2023
Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive
City of Industry, CA 91748
Attn:

Re:

Jay Kwon
Senior Project Manager
Victorville Wellness Center
Change Order Request #23
MMG Operator Usage (T&M)
Dear Jay,
Per ACI’s request, MMG Engineering Inc. supplied our operators to other subcontractors working on behalf of ACI over the course of several days. Below please find the cost breakdown:

DESCRIPTION OF WORK
1 Excavator Operator (12/27/22) @ $100/Hr
Unit
2 HR
2 HR
8 HR
4 HR
8 HR
4 HR
AMOUNT
200.00$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2 Excavator Operator (12/28/22) @ $100/Hr
3 Excavator Operator (12/29/22) @ $100/Hr
4 Excavator Operator (12/30/22) @ $100/Hr
5 Backhoe Operator (12/30/22) @ $100/Hr
6 Excavator Operator (1/3/23) @ $100/Hr
200.00
800.00
400.00
800.00
400.00
Total 2,800.00
+ 15% markup $ 420.00
TOTAL $ 3,220.00
Please see signed T&M ticket attached for your records.

Please execute a contract change order as soon as possible, so we can include this in our next progress billing.

Respectfully submitted,
MMG Engineering, Inc
Masha Cummings
President
cc: Steve Spooner; Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Marcus Ehrhardt (MMG)
MMG Engineering, Inc. • 1401 Warner Avenue, Suite B • Tustin, CA 92780 • (714) 247-1040 • Fax (714) 247-1041

6.MASA, Install bottom sheet metal.

7. MASA, Additional preparation for
waterproofing.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 139Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive 09-21-2022
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Foundation and CMU details
Reference:

Drawing No:Tel: (626) 405-0131
Specification: PGRD plans sheet # 3Fax:

Respond by: Submitted by: Ayman Hanna
Questions or Clarification:

Please provide the CMU and Foundation installtion details.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Charter/ Spectrum, Fiber optic provider can providing all three.

Potential cost impact? TBD Potential schedule impact? TBDYes No Yes No Response:
'HWDLO ꢀꢁ$ꢂꢃꢄꢃ DQG RWKHU VLPLODU GHWDLOV LQ WKH $ 3ODQ DOUHDG\ VKRZV WKH FRQFUHWH EHLQJ UDLVHG E\ ꢅꢆ DERYH WKH &UDZO 6SDFH )LQLVK *UDGH WR PDNH WKH &08 MXVW ꢇ /D\HUVꢄ <RX FDQ WKLFNHQ WKH FRQFUHWH WR PDWFK WKH ZLGWK RI WKH ꢅꢇꢆ )RXQGDWLRQ WR PDNH WKH IRUP ZRUN HDVLHUꢄ ꢅꢇꢆ $GGLWLRQDO H[FDYDWLRQ RQ ERWK VLGH RI WKH IRXQGDWLRQ DQG WKH IRUPZRUN QHHG WR EH DGGHG WR DFFRPPRGDWH WKH ZDWHUSURRILQJꢄ Response by: 0\XQJ &KXQJꢈ $,$
ꢉꢁꢇꢊꢁꢇꢋꢇꢇDate:

VVWC 139 Detail report
RFI detail
#139 Foundation and CMU installation details
Status Closed
Created on
Ball in court
Answered
Sep 21, 2022 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Sep 27, 2022 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Question
Please provide the foundation and CMU installation details Official response
Detail 4/A-3.3 and other similar details in the A Plan already shows the concrete being raised by 1" above the Crawl Space Finish Grade to make the CMU just 2 Layers(See uploaded Detail). You can thicken the concrete to match the width of the 12" Foundation to make the form work easier. 12" Additional excavation on both side of the foundation and the formwork need to be added to accommodate the waterproofing.

Ayman Hanna (ACI) - Sep 27, 2022, 7:10 AM PDT
References
Files (2)
ȏ RFI # 139 CMU & Foundation installtion details.pdf
ȏ Stem Wall Foundation Detail.jpg
Impact
Cost impact -
-Schedule impact
Other attributes
Priority Normal
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Sep 27, 2022 at 7:11 AM PDT Page 1 of 3

VVWC 139 Detail report
Discipline -
-
-
-
-
Category
Location
Location details
External id
Co-reviewer(s) Ali Nazari (Pacifica)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
christinay christinay (ACI)
Cruz Baez (Pacifica)
eherrera eherrera (Pacifica)
Jay Kwon (ACI)
Luis Diaz (Pacifica)
Myung Chung (CMC)
Rick Hernandez (Pacifica)
Sal Diaz (Pacifica)
Sal Torres (Pacifica)
Steve Spooner (ACI)
Architect
Construction Manager
Contractor
Executive
Field Inspector
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Superintendent
ACI
CMC
Pacifica
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Sep 27, 2022 at 7:11 AM PDT Page 2 of 3

VVWC 139 Detail report
Activities By At
Myung Chung
changed the status from Open In review to Open Answered official response: Detail 4/A-3.3 and other similar details in the A Plan already shows the concrete being raised by 1" above the Crawl Space Finish Grade to make the CMU just 2 Layers(See uploaded Detail). You can thicken the concrete to match the width of the 12" Foundation to make the form work easier. 12" Additional excavation on both side of the foundation and the formwork need to be added to accommodate the waterproofing.

Myung
Chung
Sep 27, 2022, 1:11 AM
PDT
Detail 4/A-3.3 and other similar details in the A Plan already shows the concrete being raised by 1" above the Crawl Space Finish Grade to make the CMU just 2 Layers. You can thicken the concrete to match the width of the 12" Foundation to make the form work easier. 12" Additional excavation on both side of the foundation and the formwork need to be added to accommodate the waterproofing.

Myung
Chung
Sep 27, 2022, 1:10 AM
PDT
Myung Chung added a reference to a file Stem Wall Foundation Detail.jpg
Myung
Chung
Sep 27, 2022, 1:10 AM
PDT
Cruz Baez Sep 21, 2022, 11:45
AM PDTchanged the status from Open In review to Open In review set Ball in court to Myung Chung (CMC).

Cruz Baez
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 139 CMU & Foundation installtion details.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Sep 21, 2022, 11:24
AM PDT
Ayman Hanna (ACI) created this RFI in Closed status and set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Ayman
Hanna
Sep 21, 2022, 11:24
AM PDT
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Sep 27, 2022 at 7:11 AM PDT Page 3 of 3

8.DLAB, T&M works for opening ceiling and floors.

T&M Invoice
ϵϵϲϮꢀ,ĞŵůŽĐŬꢀꢁǀĞ
&ŽŶƚĂŶĂ͕ꢀꢂꢁꢀϵϮϯϯϱ
ƚ͗ꢀϵϬϵ͘ϱϮϳ͘ϰϱϲϳ ꢀꢁdꢂ͗ ϳͬϯϭͬϮϬϮϯ
ꢂKηϮ
Ĩ͗ꢀϴϳϳ͘ϴϯϯ͘ϴϱϮϲ
ꢃ>ꢁꢄΛꢃ>ꢁꢄꢃƌǇǁĂůů͘ĐŽŵ /EsK/ꢃꢂ͗
>ŝĐꢀηϵϴϲϬϵϬ
&KZ͗ WZK:ꢂꢃdꢄ>Kꢃꢁd/KE͗
ꢁŶŐĞůĞƐꢀꢂŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ͕ꢀ/ŶĐ͘
ϳϴϯꢀWŚŝůůŝƉƐꢀꢃƌŝǀĞ
ꢂŝƚǇꢀŽĨꢀ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌǇ͕ꢀꢂꢁꢀϵϭϳϰϴ
sŝĐƚŽƌǀŝůůĞꢀtĞůůŶĞƐƐꢀꢂĞŶƚĞƌꢀWŚĂƐĞꢀϮ
ϭϲϵϬϮꢀ&ŝƌƐƚꢀ^ƚ
sŝĐƚŽƌǀŝůůĞ͕ꢀꢂꢁꢀϵϮϯϵϮ
ꢀꢂ^ꢃZ/Wd/KE ꢁDKhEd
^ĐŽƉĞꢄŽĨꢄǁŽƌŬꢄĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͗
tĞĞŬꢄĞŶĚŝŶŐꢄϬϲͬϭϬͬϮϯꢄ
ϬϲͬϬϴͬϮϯꢄΘꢄϬϲͬϬϵͬϮϯꢀͲꢀꢃĞŵŽꢀƐƵďĨůŽŽƌꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚꢀĂŶĚꢀĚƌǇǁĂůůꢀŽŶꢀĐĞŝůŝŶŐƐͬǁĂůůƐꢀĨŽƌꢀŵĞĐŚŝŶĐĂůͬ,sꢁꢂ ϯϮꢄŚƌƐꢄΛꢄΨϭϬϬ͘ϬϬͬŚƌ Ψꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϯꢀ ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϰꢀ ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ
tĞĞŬꢄĞŶĚŝŶŐꢄϬϲͬϭϳͬϮϯꢄ
ϬϲͬϭϮͬϮϯꢄͲꢄ&ƌĂŵĞꢀƉůĂƚĨŽƌŵƐꢀŽŶꢀƌŽŽĨ͕ꢀZĞŵŽǀĞꢀϰǆϴꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚꢀƐŚĞĞƚꢀŝŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴꢀŽŶꢀĨůŽŽƌ͘ ϬϲͬϭϯͬϮϯꢄͲꢄ&ŝŶŝƐŚĞĚꢀƉůĂƚĨŽƌŵƐꢀŽŶꢀƌŽŽĨ͘ꢀꢂƵƚꢀŽƵƚꢀꢃƌǇǁĂůůꢀĨŽƌꢀ'ƌĂǇĐŽŶꢀŽŶꢀꢄƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ ϬϲͬϭϲͬϮϯꢄͲꢄ&ƌĂŵĞꢀŽƵƚꢀƉůĂƚĨŽƌŵꢀĨŽƌꢀ'ƌĂǇĐŽŶꢀŽŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ꢀ ϰϮꢄŚƌƐꢄΛϭϬϬ͘ϬϬͬŚƌ
tĞĞŬꢄĞŶĚŝŶŐꢄϬϲͬϮϰͬϮϯ
ϬϲͬϮϬͬϮϯꢄͲꢄ^ŝĚŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴꢀͲꢀϮΖꢀŽĨꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŵŝƐƐŝŶŐꢀĂůŽŶŐꢀƉĂƌĂƉĞƚꢀǁĂůů͘ꢀꢅĂƐƚꢀƐŝĚĞꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀŽŶůǇ͘ ϬϲͬϮϭͬϮϯꢄͲꢄꢁĚĚĞĚꢀďůŽĐŬŝŶŐꢀƚŽꢀƉůĂƚĨŽƌŵꢀŽŶꢀƌŽŽĨꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ ꢃĞŵŽꢀꢃƌǇǁĂůůꢀŝŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϭϭꢀĨŽƌꢀ'ƌĂǇĐŽŶ͘ꢀꢃĞŵŽꢀƚŝůĞꢀĂŶĚꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚꢀƐƵďĨůŽŽƌꢀŝŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϵꢀĨŽƌꢀ 'ƌĂǇĐŽŶ͘ꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůĞĚꢀĚŝǀŝĚŝŶŐꢀƚƌŝŵꢀĨŽƌꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϭϬꢀƐŽƵƚŚƐŝĚĞꢀŵŽĚꢀĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐꢀƉŽŝŶƚƐ͘ ϬϲͬϮϮͬϮϯꢄͲꢄZĞŵŽǀĞꢀĂŶĚꢀƌĞŝŶƐƚĂůůꢀƌĂŝŶꢀŐƵƚƚĞƌƐꢀǁĞƌĞꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŝƐꢀŵŝƐƐŝŶŐ͕ꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϭϬꢀΘꢀϭϭ͘ꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůꢀĚŝǀŝĚŝŶŐꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀƚƌŝŵ͘ꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůĞĚꢀƐŝƐŝŶꢀŝŶꢀĂƌĞĂƐꢀŶŽƚꢀŽŶꢀƐĐŽƉĞꢀ;ŶĞĂƌꢀ ĐŽƌŶĞƌƐꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐͿ
ϮϭꢄŚƌƐꢄΛꢄΨϭϬϬ͘ϬϬͬŚƌ ΨꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϮꢀ ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϮꢀ ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
tĞĞŬꢄĞŶĚŝŶŐꢄϬϳͬϬϭͬϮϯ
ϬϲͬϮϵͬϮϯꢄͲꢄ&ƌĂŵĞꢀƉŽŶǇꢀǁĂůůꢀŝŶꢀŬŝƚĐŚĞŶͬĐĂĨĞƚĞƌŝĂ͖ꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ꢀDĂƚĞƌŝĂůꢀƉŝĐŬꢀƵƉꢀĨŽƌꢀƉŽŶǇꢀǁĂůů͘ꢀtĞŶƚꢀŽǀĞƌꢀĨƌĂŵŝŶŐꢀĚĞƚĂŝůƐꢀǁŝƚŚꢀꢁꢂ/ꢀĨŽƌꢀƉŽŶǇꢀǁĂůů͘ꢀWĂƚĐŚꢀďĂĐŬꢀ ƉůǇǁŽŽĚꢀŽŶꢀƉŽŶǇǁĂůůꢀůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘
ϬϲͬϯϬͬϮϯꢄͲꢄ/ŶƐƚĂůůĞĚꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐͬƚƌŝŵꢀΘꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴꢀĨŽƌꢀꢁꢂ/ꢀƚŽꢀŝŶƐƉĞĐƚꢀĂŶĚꢀĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞꢀŚŽǁꢀƚŽꢀĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞ͘ꢀKƉĞŶꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚꢀĨŽƌꢀĐƌĂǁůꢀƐƉĂĐĞꢀĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘ꢀꢄƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ꢀ ꢄĞŐĂŶꢀƚŽꢀŝŶƐƚĂůůꢀƚƌŝŵꢀĨŽƌꢀƐŽĨĨŝƚꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘
ϮϬꢄŚƌƐꢄΛꢄΨϭϬϬ͘ϬϬͬŚƌ
tĞĞŬꢄĞŶĚŝŶŐꢄϬϳͬϬϳͬϮϯ
ϬϳͬϬϱͬϮϯꢄͲꢄꢄƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴꢀtĞƐƚꢀƐŝĚĞꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐ͗ꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůĞĚꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌꢀƚƌŝŵ͕ꢀĚŝǀŝĚŝŶŐꢀƚƌŝŵ͕ꢀǌŝƉꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀƐŽĨĨŝƚꢀĂƌĞĂꢀŽŶꢀĚĞĐŬ͘ꢀꢂƵƚꢀĚƌǇǁĂůůꢀĨŽƌꢀ'ƌĂǇĐŽŶꢀŝŶꢀꢄƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϭϭ͘ ϬϳͬϬϳͬϮϯꢄͲꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůꢀďŽƚƚŽŵꢀĨĂĐĞꢀŽĨꢀƐŽĨĨŝƚꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŝŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ꢀꢂŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚꢀǁĞĂƚŚĞƌꢀƉƌŽŽĨŝŶŐꢀŝŶꢀĂƌĞĂ͘ꢀKƉĞŶĞĚꢀƵƉꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚꢀĂŶĚꢀĚƌǇǁĂůůꢀĨŽƌꢀŐƌĂǇĐŽŶꢀŝŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϭϬ͘ꢀ /ŶƐƚĂůůĞĚꢀďŽƚƚŽŵꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐꢀĂƌŽƵŶĚꢀĐŽůƵŵŶƐꢀŽŶꢀĚĞĐŬꢀǁŝƚŚꢀǁĞĂƚŚĞƌƉƌŽŽĨ͘ꢀꢄĞŐĂŶꢀŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶꢀϰΖꢀƌĞǀĞĂůꢀŽŶꢀĚĞĐŬꢀƐŝĚĞꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ ϯϮꢄŚƌƐꢄΛϭϬϬ͘ϬϬͬŚƌ Ψꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϯꢀ ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ
tĞĞŬꢄĞŶĚŝŶŐꢄϬϳͬϭϱͬϮϯ
ϬϳͬϭϬͬϮϯꢄͲꢄꢂŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚꢀƚŽꢀŝŶƐƚĂůůꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀŶŽƌƚŚꢀƐŝĚĞꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀꢀϴꢀĚĞĐŬꢀĂƌĞĂ͘ꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůĞĚꢀϰΗꢀƌĞǀĞĂůꢀŵŝƐƐŝŶŐꢀĂďŽƵƚꢀϮϬůĨ͘ꢀꢄĞŐĂŶꢀƚŽꢀǁƌĂƉꢀĐŽůƵŵŶƐꢀŽŶꢀĚĞĐŬꢀǁŝƚŚꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐ͘ꢀ KƉĞŶꢀĚƌǇǁĂůůꢀĂŶĚꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚꢀĨŽƌꢀƉůƵŵďĞƌƐꢀŝŶꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ꢀ/ŶǀĞƐƚŝŐĂƚĞꢀďůŽĐŬŝŶŐꢀĨŽƌꢀŵĞƌĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůꢀƐĐƌĞĞŶꢀŽŶꢀƌŽŽĨƐꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴ͘ ϬϳͬϭϭͬϮϯꢄͲꢄꢂŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚꢀŶŽƌƚŚꢀƐŝĚĞꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴꢀĚĞĐŬꢀĂƌĞĂ͘ꢀtƌĂƉƉŝŶŐꢀĐŽůƵŵŶƐꢀĂŶĚꢀĂĚĚŝŶŐꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐͬꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌꢀƚƌŝŵ͘ꢀKƉĞŶĞĚꢀĚƌǇǁĂůůꢀĨŽƌꢀƉůƵŵďĞƌꢀŝŶꢀŬŝƚĐŚĞŶꢀ ĂƌĞĂꢀĚŽĞꢀǀĞŶƚŝůĂƚŝŽŶꢀƉŝƉĞ͘ꢀ;ĂƌĞĂꢀсꢀϮΖǆϴΖϲΗͿꢀ'ŽꢀŽǀĞƌꢀďůŽĐŬŝŶŐꢀƐŝƚƵĂƚŝŶꢀǁŝƚŚꢀ:ĂǇꢀ;ꢁꢂ/ͿꢀĨŽƌꢀƌŽŽĨꢀƐĐƌĞĞŶƐ͘ ϬϳͬϭϮͬϮϯꢄͲꢄ&ŝŶŝƐŚĞĚꢀŶŽƌƚŚꢀƐŝĚĞꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀ;ƵŶĚĞƌꢀĚĞƐŬͿꢀ͘ꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůĞĚꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀƐĞĂůĞƌꢀŽŶꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌƐꢀ;ƵŶĚĞƌꢀĚĞƐŬͿ͘ꢀꢄĞŐĂŶꢀƚŽꢀŝŶƐƚĂůůꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϵ͘ꢀ ŚĂůĨꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ꢀꢂŽŶƐŝƐƚꢀŽĨꢀŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶŐꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚ͕ꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌꢀƚƌŝŵ͕ꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐ͕ꢀĂŶĚꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐ͘ꢀ ϳͬϭϯͬϮϬϮϯꢄͲꢄ^ŝĚŝŶŐꢀŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶꢀŽŶꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌƐꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϵ͘ꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůĞĚꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚ͕ꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐ͕ꢀĂŶĚꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌꢀƚƌŝŵƐꢀĂƐꢀǁĞůů͘ ϳϮꢄŚƌƐꢄΛϭϬϬ͘ϬϬͬŚƌ Ψꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϳꢀ ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ
tĞĞŬꢄĞŶĚŝŶŐꢄϬϳͬϮϮͬϮϯ
ϬϳͬϭϳͬϮϯꢄͲꢄtŽƌŬĞĚꢀŽŶꢀĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀĂůŽŶŐꢀǁŝƚŚꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚ͕ꢀƉĂƚĐŚĞƐ͕ꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐ͕ꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌꢀƚƌŝŵ͘ꢀꢁůůꢀŽŶꢀůĂĚĚĞƌ͘ ϬϳͬϭϴͬϮϯꢄͲꢄꢅǆƚĞƌŝŽƌꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶꢀ;ĐŽƌŶĞƌƐͿꢀ/ŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶꢀŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐꢀƉůǇǁŽŽĚꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐ͕ꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌꢀƚƌŝŵꢀΘꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐ͘

ϬϳͬϭϵͬϮϯꢄͲꢄꢂŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƐꢀĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌƐꢀŽĨꢀďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐꢀϴ͕ϵ͕ϭϬ͕ϭϭ͘ꢀꢀꢄƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐꢀϵ͕ϭϬ͕ϭϭꢀĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ꢀꢄƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀϴꢀͲꢀϳϱй͘ ϬϳͬϮϬͬϮϯꢄͲꢄꢂƵƚꢀŽƵƚꢀĚƌǇǁĂůůꢀ;ϯꢀůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐͿꢀĨŽƌꢀƉůƵŵďĞƌ͘ꢀꢄƵŝůĚŝŶŐꢀꢄϴ;ǆϮͿ͘ꢀϵꢀ;ϭϱƐƋꢀĨƚͿ͘ꢀ&ŝŶŝƐŚĞĚꢀŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶŐꢀĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐ͘ꢀ/ŶĐůƵĚĞƐꢀƉůǇǁŽŽŽĚꢀƉĂƚĐŚ͕ꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐ͕ꢀĐŽƌŶĞƌꢀ ƚƌŝŵꢀĂŶĚĚꢀƐŝĚŝŶŐ͘ꢀ;ĞǆĐĞƉƚꢀĂƌĞĂꢀǁŚĞƌĞꢀĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐꢀŝƐꢀŵŝƐƐŝŶŐꢀŽŶꢀĚĞĐŬ͘Ϳ Ψꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϱꢀ ͕ϳϬϬ͘ϬϬ
Ψꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϲꢀ ϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϱϳꢄŚƌƐꢄΛꢄΨϭϬϬ͘ϬϬͬŚƌ
tĞĞŬꢄĞŶĚŝŶŐꢄϬϳͬϮϴͬϮϯ
ϬϳͬϮϳͬϮϯꢄͲꢄZĞĨƌĂŵĞĚꢀŬŝƚĐŚĞŶꢀůŽǁꢀǁĂůů͘ꢀΛꢀϮΖꢀƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐꢀǁĞƌĞꢀƌĂŝƐĞĚꢀŽŶꢀĞĂĐŚꢀĞŶĚꢀƚŽꢀƐĞĐƵƌĞꢀǁĂůů͘ꢀ ϲꢄŚƌƐꢄΛꢄΨϭϬϬ͘ϬϬꢄͬŚƌ
&ŝĞůĚꢄ>ĂďŽƌ
:ŽƵƌŶĞǇŵĂŶꢀZĂƚĞ
ϮϴϮꢄŚƌƐꢄΛꢄΨϭϬϬ͘ϬϬꢄͬꢄŚƌ
ΨꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄϮꢄ ϴ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ΨꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄϮꢄ ϴ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ꢂƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ꢄDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ꢄĂŶĚꢄZĞŶƚĂůƐ
DĂƚĞƌŝĂůꢀΘꢀ^ƚŽĐŬŝŶŐ Ψꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϭ͕ϳϱϬ͘ϴϰ dŽƚĂůꢄꢂƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ꢄDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐꢄΘꢄZĞŶƚĂůƐ Ψꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄϭ͕ϳϱϬ͘ϴϰ K,ΘW ϭϱ͘ϬϬй Ψꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀꢀϰꢀ ͕ϰϵϮ͘ϲϯ
Ψꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄϰꢄ ͕ϰϵϮ͘ϲϯ dKdꢁ> Ψꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄꢄϯϰ͕ϰϰϯ͘ϰϳ I hereby agree to the above project cost(s) and approve start of work:
ꢁWWZKsꢅꢃꢀꢄz͗ ^/'EꢁdhZꢅ͗ ꢃꢁdꢅ͗

VVWC 154.2 Detail report
RFI detail
#154.2 Window pass through counter # 67&68
Status Closed
Created on
Ball in court
answered
Nov 4, 2022 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Jul 18, 2023 by Cruz Baez (Pacifica)
Question
Please provide us with the approved window drawings at the service counter item # 67 and the pass shelf item #

98. NOTE: The s/s counters must be installed prior to windows, window frames, and or roll-up doors.

Official response
There is no approved window drawing.

Proceed with custom design build service counter and window per sketches provided earlier. -Myung Chung
By Cruz Baez (Pacifica) - Jul 18, 2023, 8:28 AM PDT
References
Files (4)
ȏ RFI # 154.1 Window passing through counter # 67 & 68.pdf ȏ RFI # 154.2 Kitchen Pony Wall Details.pdf
ȏ Non Bearing Partition Wall Detail.pdf
ȏ Pass Thru Window and Tray Pick Up Cabinet Sketch R1.pdf Impact
Cost impact Yes
YesSchedule impact
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on -ul 19, 2023 at 7:58 AM PDT Page 1 of 4

VVWC 154.2 Detail report
Other attributes
Priority High
Discipline -
-
-
-
-
Category
Location
Location details
External id
Co-reviewer(s) Ali Nazari (Pacifica)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Cruz Baez (Pacifica)
Ed Herrera (Pacifica)
Jay Kwon (ACI)
Luis Diaz (Pacifica)
Myung Chung (CMC)
Rick Hernandez (Pacifica)
Sal Diaz (Pacifica)
Sal Torres (Pacifica)
Steve Spooner (ACI)
Architect
Construction Manager
Contractor
Executive
Field Inspector
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Superintendent
ACI
CMC
Pacifica
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Jul 19, 2023 at 7:58 AM PDT Page 2 of 4

VVWC 154.2 Detail report
Activities By At
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open Answered to Closed
Ayman
Hanna
Jul 19, 2023, 7:58 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file Pass Thru Window and Tray Pick Up Cabinet Sketch R1.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Jul 19, 2023, 7:56 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file Non Bearing Partition Wall Detail.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Jul 19, 2023, 7:56 AM
PDT
Cruz Baez Jul 18, 2023, 8:28 AM
PDTchanged the status from Open In Review to Open Answered set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Cruz Baez
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 154.2 Kitchen Pony Wall Details.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Jul 12, 2023, 2:32 PM
PDT
Ayman Hanna Ayman
Hanna
Jul 12, 2023, 2:31 PM
PDTchanged the status from Open Answered to Open In Review set Ball in court to Cruz Baez (Pacifica).

Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Closed to Open Answered
Ayman Hanna changed the ID to 154.2
Ayman
Hanna
Jul 12, 2023, 2:26 PM
PDT
Please provide dimensions and details for the kitchen pony wall with a glass window.

Ayman
Hanna
Jul 12, 2023, 2:26 PM
PDT
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open Answered to Closed
Ayman
Hanna
May 12, 2023, 2:09
PM PDT
Cruz Baez
changed the status from Open Answered to Open Answered
Mar 31, 2023, 11:10
AM PDT
Official response: There is no approved window drawing.

Proceed with custom design build service counter and window per sketches provided earlier.

Cruz Baez
-Myung Chung
Myung Chung
changed the status from Open In Review to Open Answered Myung
Chung
Mar 31, 2023, 9:11
AM PDTOfficial response: There is no approved window drawing.

Proceed with custom design build service counter and window per sketches provided earlier.

There is no approved window drawing. Proceed with custom design build service counter and window per sketches provided earlier.

Myung
Chung
Mar 31, 2023, 9:10
AM PDT
Cruz Baez Mar 29, 2023, 1:21
PM PDTchanged the status from Open In Review to Open In Review set Ball in court to Myung Chung (CMC).

Cruz Baez
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Jul 19, 2023 at 7:58 AM PDT Page 3 of 4

VVWC 154.2 Detail report
Ayman Hanna Ayman
Hanna
Mar 29, 2023, 1:10
PM PDTchanged the status from Open Answered to Open In Review Ayman Hanna cleared due date
Ayman
Hanna
Mar 29, 2023, 1:10
PM PDTplease provide the window model number and brand.

Ayman Hanna Ayman
Hanna
Mar 29, 2023, 1:10
PM PDTchanged the status from Open Answered to Open Answered set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open In Review to Open Answered Ayman Hanna
Mar 29, 2023, 1:10
PM PDTOfficial response: please provide the window model number and brand.

Ali Nazari Myung Chung Rick Hernandez Jay Kwon Cruz Baez Ed Herrera please provide the window model number and brand.

Ayman
Hanna
Mar 29, 2023, 1:08
PM PDT
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 154.1 Window passing through counter # 67 & 68.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Nov 16, 2022, 6:21
AM PST
Cruz Baez Nov 4, 2022, 8:56 AM
PDTchanged the status from Open In Review to Open In Review set Ball in court to Myung Chung (CMC).

Cruz Baez
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 154.1 Window passing through counter # 67 & 68.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Nov 4, 2022, 8:51 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna (ACI) created this RFI in Closed status and set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Ayman
Hanna
Nov 4, 2022, 8:51 AM
PDT
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Jul 19, 2023 at 7:58 AM PDT Page 4 of 4

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 154.1
11-04-2022
Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Window pass through counter # 67&68
Reference:

Drawing No:

Specification:

K Plans sheet # K-1.1 Elevation 2/K-7.1
Ayman Hanna
Tel: (626) 405-0131
Fax:

Respond by: Submitted by:

Questions or Clarification:

Please provide us with the approved window drawings at the service counter item # 67 and the pass shelf item # 98 NOTE: The s/s counters must be installed prior to windows, window frames, and or roll-up doors.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Potential cost impact? TBD Potential schedule impact? TBD Yes
Yes No No
Response:

Response by:

Date:

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 154.2
10-07-2022
Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Window pass through counter # 67&68.

Reference:

Drawing No:

Specification:

K Plans sheet # K-3.1 Elevation 1&2/K-7.1
Ayman Hanna
Tel: (626) 405-0131
Fax:

Respond by: High priority Submitted by:

Questions or Clarification:

Please provide dimensions details for the kitchen pony wall with a glass window.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Potential cost impact?
Response:

Potential schedule impact?Yes No Yes No
Response by:

Date:

PLUMBINGNOTES
K P I

PLUMBINGSYMBOLS

PLUMBING
PLAN
K-3.1

SCALE:
1 SCALE:

SCALE:

SCALE:
2ELEVATION

ELEVATION

ELEVATION
K P I
SCALE:
3 SCALE:
4 SCALE:
5 6ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION
SCALE:
7 SCALE:
8 SCALE:
9 10

EQUIPMENT

ELEVATIONSELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION
K-7.1

9. Cooley, Grade small patch in parking lots
including subbase.

ꢌꢆ"ꢇ34!"ꢂꢄꢛꢄ&ꢃ5!ꢞꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄꢛꢄꢅꢆ6ꢁꢈ7
ꢒꢃ$ꢁ8ꢃꢈꢇꢁꢆꢞꢄꢛꢄꢏ!55ꢃ"#ꢁꢆꢞꢄꢛꢄꢔꢈ8-$ꢇ"ꢁꢆꢞꢄꢛꢄꢅ-9ꢞꢁ#ꢄ:!"ꢂ
ꢊꢋꢕꢒꢔꢚꢎꢖꢇꢞꢘꢘꢑꢆꢒꢒꢂꢏꢆꢞꢁ !"ꢈꢁꢆꢄꢄꢍꢁ#ꢃꢈ$ꢃ%
&ꢔꢒ% 'ꢝꢝꢝꢝꢝꢝ+ꢝꢚ
:ꢃ9ꢎꢁꢇꢃ;ꢄ4440#!!ꢞꢃ.#!ꢈ$ꢇ"-#ꢇꢁ!ꢈ0ꢈꢃꢇ
ꢚ+ꢜꢝꢚꢜ

10. COOLEY, Additional mobilization
and Asphalt works..
'*,ꢗ,ꢄꢌ-#ꢆꢞ.(ꢇ-$ꢄꢎꢇ"ꢃꢃꢇꢓꢄꢎ-ꢁꢇꢃꢄꢋꢄ
/ꢃ$(ꢃ"ꢁꢆꢄꢏꢆꢄꢙꢗꢚ+,
ꢎꢔꢖꢔꢌ!ꢇꢞꢘꢘꢑꢆꢒꢒꢂꢌꢛꢀꢆꢁꢞ;ꢄꢃ$ꢇꢁ5ꢆꢇꢁꢈ7<#!!ꢞꢃ.#!ꢈ$ꢇ"-#ꢇꢁ!ꢈ0ꢈꢃꢇ ꢅ0ꢐ0ꢄ1!2ꢄ+ꢝ'ꢜ'ꢝ
/ꢃ$(ꢃ"ꢁꢆꢄꢏꢆꢄꢙꢗꢚ+ꢝ
ꢅ"!(!$ꢆꢞꢄ)ꢄꢏ!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ
ꢀꢁꢂ ꢃꢄꢁꢅꢆꢇꢍꢎꢅꢆꢂꢇꢇꢇꢇꢇꢇꢝ*=ꢗꢜ=ꢗꢝꢗꢚ
ꢒꢓ ꢇꢜꢑꢁꢙꢂ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢇꢃꢈ
'ꢙꢚꢖꢃꢄꢁꢅꢆꢇꢈꢁꢉ
For Review
07/28/2023 10:29:45 AM
ꢏꢆꢇꢐꢑꢁꢐꢁꢒꢆꢇꢅꢁꢇꢓꢄꢑꢌꢔꢒꢋꢇꢕꢁꢄꢇꢖꢎꢗꢁꢑꢇꢎꢌꢘꢇꢙꢎꢅꢆꢑꢔꢎꢖꢇꢔꢌꢇꢒꢅꢑꢔꢚꢅꢇꢎꢚꢚꢁꢑꢘꢎꢌꢚꢆꢇꢛꢔꢅꢋꢇꢅꢋꢆꢇꢐꢖꢎꢌꢒꢇꢎꢌꢘꢇꢒꢐꢆꢚꢔꢓꢔꢚꢎꢅꢔꢁꢌꢒꢇꢎꢒꢇꢓꢁꢖꢖꢁꢛꢒꢂ ꢔꢉꢊꢋꢕꢋꢒꢅꢖꢗꢘꢓꢙꢍꢚꢗꢕꢕꢋꢄꢛꢋꢕꢕꢉꢋꢒꢒꢄꢆꢋꢉꢓꢋꢍꢄꢅꢄꢆꢌRꢅꢁꢁ4ꢄꢅꢄꢔꢎꢎꢋꢎꢄꢜꢙꢚꢋꢄꢝꢄ ꢍꢈꢎꢋꢄꢏꢋꢘꢙꢉꢎꢗꢓꢗꢙꢉ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢄꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢋꢄꢌꢍꢎꢋꢍꢄꢏꢋꢐꢑꢋꢒꢓ
ꢀꢁꢂꢀꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢃꢇꢈꢈꢄꢁꢉ
ꢊꢋ ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢁꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢇꢉꢊꢋꢇꢅꢌꢃꢍꢅꢎꢃꢏꢊꢐꢇꢌꢑ ꢒꢓꢔꢕꢖꢔꢔꢗꢔꢔ
ꢌꢍꢎꢏꢐꢆꢀꢑꢍꢒꢍꢓꢏꢐꢆꢀꢑꢔꢕꢖꢗ ꢘꢋꢊꢙꢚꢊꢊꢛꢊꢊ
%ꢚꢋꢇꢈꢁꢉ $ꢅꢆꢙꢇꢈꢁꢉ ꢍꢆꢒꢚꢑꢔꢐꢅꢔꢁꢌ ꢃꢄꢎꢌꢅꢔꢅꢕ "# "ꢌꢔꢅꢇꢊꢑꢔꢚꢆ
@'ꢓꢜ,ꢝ0ꢝꢝ
ꢀꢁꢅꢎꢖꢇꢊꢑꢔꢚꢆ
ꢝ'
ꢝ'
ꢝ'
ꢝ'
'
ꢗ
ꢚ
+
ꢀ!9ꢁꢞꢁ>ꢆꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄ?!"ꢄ?ꢁꢈꢃꢄꢋ"ꢆ8ꢃ
ꢀ!9ꢁꢞꢁ>ꢆꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄ?!"ꢄꢅꢆ6ꢁꢈ7
'
'
'
'
ꢑꢐꢑꢍ
ꢑꢐꢑꢍ
ꢍꢎ
@'ꢓꢜ,ꢝ0ꢝꢝ
@'ꢓꢙ,ꢝ0ꢝꢝ
@ꢚꢓꢗꢝꢝ0ꢝꢝ
@ꢚꢓꢜꢝꢝ0ꢝꢝ
@'ꢓꢙ,ꢝ0ꢝꢝ
@ꢚꢓꢗꢝꢝ0ꢝꢝ
@ꢚꢓꢜꢝꢝ0ꢝꢝ
ꢏꢞꢃꢆꢈꢄA(ꢄ)ꢄꢒꢃꢛꢏ!ꢈ8ꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄ1ꢆ$ꢃꢄꢋ"ꢆ8ꢃ
ꢏ!5(ꢞꢃꢇꢃꢄAsphaltꢄꢅꢆ6ꢁꢈ7ꢄꢐ ꢄꢎ5ꢆꢞꢞꢄ ꢍꢎ
ꢎꢃ#ꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄꢍꢃ ꢇꢄꢐ-ꢇ
ꢀꢁꢅꢎꢖꢇꢓꢁꢑꢂ ꢞꢘꢘꢆꢘꢇ ꢁꢗꢔꢖꢔ+ꢎꢅꢔꢁꢌꢇꢜꢁꢑꢇꢊꢎ,ꢔꢌ! &'()*((ꢉ((
&'()*((ꢉ((ꢀꢁꢅꢎꢖꢇꢊꢑꢁꢐꢁꢒꢎꢖꢇꢊꢑꢔꢚꢆꢂ
ꢀ-. %ꢇꢞꢈꢍꢇ/0ꢈꢍ$ꢀ$0ꢈ%
1/ꢁꢌꢅꢔꢌꢄꢆꢘꢇꢁꢌꢇꢌꢆꢝꢅꢇꢐꢎ!ꢆ2
ꢊꢎ!ꢆꢇ'ꢇꢁꢓꢇ3

/ꢁꢁꢖꢆꢕ
ꢊꢑꢁꢐꢁꢒꢎꢖꢇ1/ꢁꢌꢅ4ꢘ2
'0ꢄꢏ!!ꢞꢃ.ꢄꢏ!ꢈ$ꢇ"-#ꢇꢁ!ꢈꢓꢄꢔꢈ#0ꢄꢁ$ꢄꢆꢄꢈ!ꢈꢛ-ꢈꢁ!ꢈꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ!"ꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ4ꢁꢞꢞꢄꢈ!ꢇꢄ9ꢃ#!5ꢃꢄ$ꢁ7ꢈꢆꢇ!".ꢄꢇ!ꢄꢆꢈ.ꢄꢞꢆ9!"ꢄꢆ7"ꢃꢃ5ꢃꢈꢇ$0 ꢗ0ꢄꢑ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞꢄ$3ꢆꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃ#!5ꢃꢄꢆꢄ(ꢆ"ꢇꢄ! ꢄꢆꢈ.ꢄ -ꢇ-"ꢃꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ$ꢄ!"ꢄ(-"#3ꢆ$ꢃꢄ!"8ꢃ"$0ꢄꢔ ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞꢄꢁ$ꢄꢆ##ꢃ(ꢇꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄ$ꢁ7ꢈꢆꢇ-"ꢃꢓꢄꢁꢇꢄ$3ꢆꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃ#!5ꢃꢄꢆꢄ 9ꢁꢈ8ꢁꢈ7ꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ0
ꢚ0ꢄꢅ"ꢁ#ꢃ$ꢄ!ꢈꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞ=#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇꢄ$3ꢆꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃꢄ ꢁ"5ꢄꢁ ꢄꢆ##ꢃ(ꢇꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄ$ꢁ7ꢈꢆꢇ-"ꢃꢄ!"ꢄꢁꢈ#!"(!"ꢆꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄꢁꢈꢇ!ꢄꢆꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ=(-"#3ꢆ$ꢃꢄ!"8ꢃ"ꢄ4ꢁꢇ3ꢁꢈꢄꢚꢝꢄ#ꢆꢞꢃꢈ8ꢆ"ꢄ 8ꢆ.$ꢄ! ꢄꢁꢇ$ꢄ#"ꢃꢆꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄ!"ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞ=#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇꢄ5ꢆ.ꢄ9ꢃ#!5ꢃꢄꢈ-ꢞꢞꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ6!ꢁ80 +0ꢄꢅ"ꢁ#ꢃ$ꢄꢆ"ꢃꢄ9ꢆ$ꢃ8ꢄ!ꢈꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄꢇꢃ"5$ꢄ! ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞꢕ ꢁ"$ꢇꢘꢓꢄꢆꢈ.ꢄ(ꢞꢆꢈ$ꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ$(ꢃ#ꢁ ꢁ#ꢆꢇꢁ!ꢈ$ꢄꢆ6ꢆꢁꢞꢆ9ꢞꢃꢄꢆꢇꢄ9ꢁ8ꢄꢇꢁ5ꢃꢄꢁꢈ#ꢞ-8ꢁꢈ7ꢄꢆꢈ.ꢄꢆ88ꢃꢈ8ꢆꢕ$ꢃ#!ꢈ8ꢘꢓꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ ꢆꢈ.ꢄ("ꢃꢛ9ꢁ8ꢄ$ꢁꢇꢃꢄ6ꢁ$ꢁꢇ$ꢄ!"ꢄ5ꢃꢃꢇꢁꢈ7$ꢕꢇ3ꢁ"8ꢘ0ꢄꢉꢈ.ꢄ"ꢃB-ꢃ$ꢇꢄ !"ꢄ4!"ꢂꢄ-ꢈ8ꢃ"ꢄ#!ꢈ8ꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈ$ꢄ8ꢁ ꢃ"ꢁꢈ7ꢄ "!5ꢄꢇ3!$ꢃꢄ"ꢃ("ꢃ$ꢃꢈꢇꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞ=#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇꢄ4ꢁꢞꢞꢄ "ꢃB-ꢁ"ꢃꢄ(ꢆ.5ꢃꢈꢇꢄ !"ꢄꢆ88ꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈꢆꢞꢄ4!"ꢂꢄꢇ!ꢄ9ꢃꢄ5ꢆ8ꢃꢄꢆꢇꢄꢆꢈꢄꢆ5!-ꢈꢇꢄꢆ7"ꢃꢃ8ꢄ-(!ꢈꢄ("ꢁ!"ꢄꢇ!ꢄ(ꢃ" !"5ꢁꢈ7ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ4!"ꢂꢄ!"ꢄꢆꢇꢄꢆꢈ.ꢄ-ꢈꢁꢇꢄ("ꢁ#ꢃ$ꢄꢃ$ꢇꢆ9ꢞꢁ$3ꢃ8ꢄꢁꢈꢄ ꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞ=#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ0ꢄ
,0ꢄꢔꢇꢄꢁ$ꢄꢆ7"ꢃꢃ8ꢄꢇ3ꢆꢇꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄꢇꢃ"5$ꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ#!ꢈ8ꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈ$ꢄ! ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞ=#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇꢄ$-(ꢃ"#ꢃ8ꢃꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ#ꢆꢈ#ꢃꢞꢄꢆꢞꢞꢄ("ꢃ6ꢁ!-$ꢄ-ꢈ8ꢃ"$ꢇꢆꢈ8ꢁꢈ7$ꢄ!"ꢄꢆ7"ꢃꢃ5ꢃꢈꢇ$ꢓꢄ 43ꢃꢇ3ꢃ"ꢄ4"ꢁꢇꢇꢃꢈꢓꢄ6ꢃ"9ꢆꢞꢓꢄ!"ꢄꢁ5(ꢞꢁꢃ8ꢓꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄꢇ3ꢆꢇꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄꢇꢃ"5$ꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ#!ꢈ8ꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈ$ꢄ! ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞ=#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇꢄ$3ꢆꢞꢞꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"!ꢞꢄꢁꢈꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄꢃ6ꢃꢈꢇꢄ! ꢄꢆꢄ#!ꢈ ꢞꢁ#ꢇꢄ4ꢁꢇ3ꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ ꢇꢃ"5$ꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ#!ꢈ8ꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈ$ꢄ! ꢄꢆꢈ.ꢄ$-9$ꢃB-ꢃꢈꢇꢄꢆ7"ꢃꢃ5ꢃꢈꢇ0ꢄ
ꢖ0ꢄꢉꢞꢞꢄ#3ꢆꢈ7ꢃ$ꢄꢇ!ꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ!"ꢁ7ꢁꢈꢆꢞꢄ$#!(ꢃꢄ! ꢄ4!"ꢂꢄ!"ꢄ("!(!$ꢃ8ꢄꢃ2ꢇ"ꢆꢄ4!"ꢂꢄ5-$ꢇꢄ9ꢃꢄ8ꢁ"ꢃ#ꢇꢃ8ꢄꢁꢈꢄ4"ꢁꢇꢁꢈ7ꢄ("ꢁ!"ꢄꢇ!ꢄ4!"ꢂꢄ(ꢃ" !"5ꢆꢈ#ꢃ0ꢄ *0ꢄꢏ!$ꢇ$ꢄ"ꢃ$-ꢞꢇꢁꢈ7ꢄ "!5ꢄꢆ88ꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈꢆꢞꢄꢁꢈ$-"ꢆꢈ#ꢃꢄ"ꢃB-ꢁ"ꢃ5ꢃꢈꢇ$ꢄꢕꢄꢁ0ꢃ0ꢓꢄ("ꢁ5ꢆ".ꢄ4!"8ꢁꢈ7ꢓꢄ4ꢆꢁ6ꢃ"ꢄ! ꢄ$-9"!7ꢆꢇꢁ!ꢈꢓꢄꢃꢇ#0ꢘꢄ$3ꢆꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ"ꢃ$(!ꢈ$ꢁ9ꢁꢞꢁꢇ.ꢄ! ꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ #!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ!"=!4ꢈꢃ"ꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ#3ꢆ"7ꢃ8ꢄꢆꢇꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ$ꢆ5ꢃꢄ#!$ꢇꢄꢇ3ꢆꢇꢄ!-"ꢄꢁꢈ$-"ꢆꢈ#ꢃꢄ#!5(ꢆꢈ.ꢄ#3ꢆ"7ꢃ$ꢄ-$0 ꢜ0ꢄꢅ"ꢁ#ꢃ$ꢄ$-9Cꢃ#ꢇꢄꢇ!ꢄꢁꢈ#"ꢃꢆ$ꢃꢄ$3!-ꢞ8ꢄ$#!(ꢃꢄ! ꢄ4!"ꢂꢄ8ꢃ#"ꢃꢆ$ꢃꢄ9.ꢄ',Dꢄ!"ꢄ5!"ꢃꢄ! ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞ0ꢄ ꢙ0ꢄꢐ4ꢈꢃ"ꢄ3ꢃ"ꢃ9.ꢄꢃ2("ꢃ$$ꢞ.ꢄꢆ$$-5ꢃ$ꢄꢆꢈ.ꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄꢆꢞꢞꢄ"ꢁ$ꢂ$ꢄꢁꢈ#ꢞ-8ꢁꢈ7ꢓꢄ9-ꢇꢄꢈ!ꢇꢄꢞꢁ5ꢁꢇꢃ8ꢄꢇ!ꢓꢄ8ꢆ5ꢆ7ꢃꢄꢆꢈ8=!"ꢄ8ꢃ$ꢇ"-#ꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄ! ꢄ4!"ꢂꢓꢄ("!Cꢃ#ꢇꢄ8ꢃꢞꢆ.$ꢓꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ ꢁꢈ#"ꢃꢆ$ꢃ8ꢄ#!$ꢇ$ꢄꢆ$$!#ꢁꢆꢇꢃ8ꢄ4ꢁꢇ3ꢄꢆ#ꢇ$ꢄ! ꢄꢋ!8ꢓꢄ4ꢆ"$ꢓꢄꢃ59ꢆ"7!ꢃ$ꢓꢄꢞꢆ9!"ꢄ8ꢁ$(-ꢇꢃ$ꢓꢄ$ꢇ"ꢁꢂꢃ$ꢓꢄ(ꢁ#ꢂꢃꢇ$ꢓꢄ9!.#!ꢇꢇ$ꢓꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄꢈꢃ7ꢞꢁ7ꢃꢈ#ꢃꢄꢆꢈ8=!"ꢄ5ꢁ$#!ꢈ8-#ꢇꢄ ! ꢄ!ꢇ3ꢃ"ꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ!"$ꢓꢄ!4ꢈꢃ"E$ꢄꢆ7ꢃꢈꢇ$ꢓꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄꢇ3ꢁ"8ꢄ(ꢆ"ꢇꢁꢃ$0 'ꢝ0ꢄ&ꢃꢞꢆ.$ꢄ#ꢆ-$ꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄꢆꢈ8=!"ꢄ"ꢃ$-ꢞꢇꢁꢈ7ꢄ "!5ꢄꢆ#ꢇꢁ6ꢁꢇꢁꢃ$ꢄ!"ꢄꢈ!ꢈꢛꢆ#ꢇꢁ6ꢁꢇꢁꢃ$ꢄ! ꢄ!ꢇ3ꢃ"$ꢓꢄꢁꢈ#ꢞ-8ꢁꢈ7ꢄ9-ꢇꢄꢈ!ꢇꢄꢞꢁ5ꢁꢇꢃ8ꢄꢇ!ꢓꢄ!4ꢈꢃ"ꢓꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ!"ꢓꢄ6ꢃꢈ8!"$ꢓꢄ $-((ꢞꢁꢃ"$ꢓꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄ!ꢇ3ꢃ"ꢄ ꢆ#ꢇ!"$ꢄꢈ!ꢇꢄꢁꢈꢄ8ꢁ"ꢃ#ꢇꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"!ꢞꢓꢄ$3ꢆꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃꢄ"ꢃꢁ59-"$ꢃ8ꢄꢆꢇꢄ8ꢁ"ꢃ#ꢇꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄꢁꢈ8ꢁ"ꢃ#ꢇꢄ#!$ꢇ$ꢄ(ꢞ-$ꢄꢆꢄ5ꢆ"ꢂ-(ꢄ! ꢄ',Dꢄ!"ꢄꢆ$ꢄ$(ꢃ#ꢁ ꢁꢃ8ꢄ!"ꢄ ꢆꢞꢞ!4ꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ#!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ0ꢄꢔ ꢄ"ꢃB-ꢁ"ꢃ8ꢓꢄꢆꢈꢄꢃ2ꢇꢃꢈ$ꢁ!ꢈꢄ! ꢄꢇꢁ5ꢃꢄꢆ$ꢄꢆ7"ꢃꢃ8ꢄ4ꢁꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃꢄ7"ꢆꢈꢇꢃ80ꢄ ''0ꢄꢑ4!ꢄ4ꢃꢃꢂ$ꢄꢆ86ꢆꢈ#ꢃꢄꢈ!ꢇꢁ#ꢃꢄ"ꢃB-ꢁ"ꢃ8ꢄ("ꢁ!"ꢄꢇ!ꢄ$ꢇꢆ"ꢇꢁꢈ7ꢄ("!Cꢃ#ꢇ0ꢄ 'ꢗ0ꢄꢅ"!7"ꢃ$$ꢄ(ꢆ.5ꢃꢈꢇ$ꢄ$3ꢆꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃꢄ("!6ꢁ8ꢃ8ꢄ !"ꢄꢆꢞꢞꢄ#!5(ꢞꢃꢇꢃ8ꢄ4!"ꢂꢄꢁꢈꢄꢆ##!"8ꢆꢈ#ꢃꢄ4ꢁꢇ3ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞ0ꢄꢅ"!7"ꢃ$$ꢄ(ꢆ.5ꢃꢈꢇ$ꢄ5-$ꢇꢄ9ꢃꢄ"ꢃ#ꢃꢁ6ꢃ8ꢄꢁꢈꢄ -ꢞꢞꢄ ꢈ!ꢄꢞꢆꢇꢃ"ꢄꢇ3ꢆꢈꢄꢚꢝꢄ#ꢆꢞꢃꢈ8ꢆ"ꢄ8ꢆ.$ꢄꢆ ꢇꢃ"ꢄꢁꢈ6!ꢁ#ꢃꢄ3ꢆ$ꢄ9ꢃꢃꢈꢄ"ꢃ#ꢃꢁ6ꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄꢐ4ꢈꢃ"=ꢏ!ꢈꢇ"ꢆ#ꢇ!"0ꢄ&ꢃꢞꢁꢈB-ꢃꢈꢇꢄ(ꢆ.5ꢃꢈꢇ$ꢄ4ꢁꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃꢄ$-9Cꢃ#ꢇꢄꢇ!ꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ3ꢁ73ꢃ$ꢇꢄ ꢁꢈꢇꢃ"ꢃ$ꢇꢄ"ꢆꢇꢃꢄꢆꢞꢞ!4ꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄꢞꢆ40ꢄ
'ꢚ0ꢄꢒꢃꢇꢆꢁꢈꢆ7ꢃꢄ(ꢃ"#ꢃꢈꢇꢆ7ꢃꢄ!ꢈꢄ5!ꢈꢇ3ꢞ.ꢄ("!7"ꢃ$$ꢄ(ꢆ.5ꢃꢈꢇ$ꢄꢇ!ꢄ9ꢃꢄꢈ!ꢄ7"ꢃꢆꢇꢃ"ꢄꢇ3ꢆꢈꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ(ꢃ"#ꢃꢈꢇꢆ7ꢃꢄ"ꢃꢇꢆꢁꢈꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄꢐ4ꢈꢃ"0ꢄꢌ2#ꢃ$$ꢁ6ꢃꢄ!"ꢄ 8ꢃꢞꢁꢈB-ꢃꢈꢇꢄ"ꢃꢇꢆꢁꢈꢆ7ꢃꢄ4ꢁꢞꢞꢄ9ꢃꢄ$-9Cꢃ#ꢇꢄꢇ!ꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ3ꢁ73ꢃ$ꢇꢄꢁꢈꢇꢃ"ꢃ$ꢇꢄ"ꢆꢇꢃꢄꢆꢞꢞ!4ꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄꢞꢆ40ꢄ '+0ꢄ?ꢁꢈꢆꢞꢄ(ꢆ.5ꢃꢈꢇꢄꢕꢄꢒꢃꢇꢃꢈꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄꢘꢄꢁ$ꢄ8-ꢃꢄꢖꢝꢄ8ꢆ.$ꢄꢆ ꢇꢃ"ꢄ#!5(ꢞꢃꢇꢁ!ꢈꢄ! ꢄ!-"ꢄ4!"ꢂꢄ!"ꢄꢚꢝꢄ8ꢆ.$ꢄꢆ ꢇꢃ"ꢄ("!Cꢃ#ꢇꢄꢆ##ꢃ(ꢇꢆꢈ#ꢃꢓꢄ43ꢁ#3ꢃ6ꢃ"ꢄꢁ$ꢄꢃꢆ"ꢞꢁꢃ"0ꢄ ',0ꢄꢔ ꢄꢁꢇꢄ9ꢃ#!5ꢃ$ꢄꢈꢃ#ꢃ$$ꢆ".ꢄꢇ!ꢄꢃꢈ !"#ꢃꢄ("!6ꢁ$ꢁ!ꢈ$ꢄ! ꢄꢇ3ꢁ$ꢄ("!(!$ꢆꢞꢄ!"ꢄꢇꢃ"5$ꢄ! ꢄ(ꢆ.5ꢃꢈꢇꢓꢄꢇ3ꢃꢄ("ꢃ6ꢆꢁꢞꢁꢈ7ꢄ(ꢆ"ꢇ.ꢄ$3ꢆꢞꢞꢄ"ꢃ#!6ꢃ"ꢄ"ꢃꢆ$!ꢈꢆ9ꢞꢃꢄꢆꢇꢇ!"ꢈꢃ.E$ꢄ ꢃꢃ$ꢄꢆꢈ8ꢄꢆꢞꢞꢄ#!$ꢇ$ꢄ!ꢇ3ꢃ"4ꢁ$ꢃꢄ("!6ꢁ8ꢃ8ꢄ9.ꢄꢞꢆ40
ꢅꢒꢐꢅꢐꢎꢉꢍꢄꢉꢏꢏꢌꢅꢑꢉꢊꢏꢌ
ꢉ##ꢃ(ꢇꢆꢈ#ꢃꢄꢐ ꢄꢅ"!(!$ꢆꢞ;ꢄꢑ3ꢃꢄꢉ9!6ꢃꢄꢅ"ꢁ#ꢃ$ꢄꢉꢈ8ꢄꢑꢃ"5$ꢄꢉꢈ8ꢄꢏ!ꢈ8ꢁꢇꢁ!ꢈ$ꢄꢉ"ꢃꢄ/ꢃ"ꢃ9.ꢄꢉ##ꢃ(ꢇꢃ8 ꢏ!5(ꢆꢈ.=ꢐ4ꢈꢃ"ꢄꢊꢆ5ꢃ;
ꢎꢁ7ꢈ;

1.;
ꢑꢁꢇꢞꢃ;
&ꢆꢇꢃ;
ꢊꢎ!ꢆꢇ3ꢇꢁꢓꢇ3

ꢀꢁꢆꢇꢔꢉꢋꢖꢂꢓꢉꢂ

11.Christianbelle, Relocate Electric Vault Bldg.7
ꢌꢊꢉꢍꢅꢂꢃꢍꢆꢊꢋꢐꢆꢑꢊꢅꢋꢒꢊꢓꢔꢋꢕ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢃꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢊꢉꢋꢌꢊꢉꢍꢅꢂꢃꢍꢋꢎꢇꢍꢏ
ꢀꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢄꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈ
ꢋꢈꢌꢍꢈꢎꢏꢐꢑꢄꢒꢆꢄꢄꢓꢔꢕꢖꢁ
ꢗꢘꢙꢉꢈꢚꢄꢛꢜꢝꢃꢞꢄꢓꢖꢂ ꢕꢖꢖꢖ
!ꢈ"ꢌꢏ#ꢈꢚꢄ$$$%&ꢘꢎꢏꢌ#ꢏꢐꢉ"ꢈ''ꢈ%&ꢙ(
ꢆꢉ)ꢈ'ꢈꢌꢄꢒꢙꢉ#ꢎꢐ&#ꢙꢎꢄꢅꢉ&
ꢜꢂꢕꢄꢗꢘꢏ''ꢏꢍꢌꢄ*ꢎ
ꢀꢓꢄ.ꢊꢉꢈꢄꢔꢃꢔꢕ
.ꢙ"ꢄꢅ*ꢚꢄ./0 ꢔꢃꢔꢔ ꢃꢃꢖꢂ
1ꢏ&#ꢙꢎꢇꢏ''ꢈꢑꢄꢒꢆꢒꢏ#+ꢄꢙ,ꢄꢅꢉ-ꢊꢌ#ꢎ+ꢑꢄꢒꢐꢄꢓꢀꢜꢖꢂ
ꢀꢝꢓꢃꢔꢄ2ꢏꢎꢌ#ꢄ3#
ꢆ##ꢈꢉ#ꢏꢙꢉꢚꢄꢆ+(ꢐꢉꢄꢋꢐꢉꢉꢐ 1ꢏ&#ꢙꢎꢇꢏ''ꢈꢑꢄꢒꢆꢄꢓꢔꢕꢓꢁ
;ꢈꢚꢄꢒꢘꢐꢉ)ꢈꢄ/ꢎ-ꢈꢎꢄꢒ/ ꢃꢃꢀꢀꢄ,ꢙꢎꢚꢄ1ꢏ&#ꢙꢎꢇꢏ''ꢈꢄ!ꢈ''ꢉꢈꢌꢌꢄꢒꢈꢉ#ꢈꢎꢄꢗꢘꢐꢌꢈꢄ<$ꢙ !ꢈꢄꢐꢎꢈꢄꢍ'ꢈꢐꢌꢈ-ꢄ#ꢙꢄ4ꢊꢙ#ꢈꢄꢙꢉꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢐ"ꢙꢇꢈꢄꢒꢘꢐꢉ)ꢈꢄ/ꢎ-ꢈꢎꢄꢒ/ ꢃꢃꢀꢀꢄꢐꢌꢄ,ꢙ''ꢙ$ꢌ% ꢀ% 56&ꢐꢇꢐ#ꢈꢄꢐꢎꢈꢐꢄꢉꢈꢐꢎꢄꢈ6ꢏꢌ#ꢏꢉ)ꢄꢇꢐꢊ'#ꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄ&ꢙꢉ-ꢊꢏ#ꢌꢄꢌꢙꢄ&ꢙꢉ-ꢊꢏ#ꢌꢄ&ꢐꢉꢄ"ꢈꢄ&ꢊ#ꢄ"ꢐ&7 ꢔ% 56&ꢐꢇꢐ#ꢈꢄꢉꢈ$ꢄꢇꢐꢊ'#ꢄ'ꢙ&ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉ
ꢕ% 3ꢈ#ꢄ)ꢎꢐꢇꢈ'ꢄꢐ#ꢄꢉꢈ$ꢄꢇꢐꢊ'#ꢄ'ꢙ&ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉ
ꢖ% 3ꢈ#ꢄꢉꢈ$ꢄꢇꢐꢊ'#ꢄꢔꢖ8ꢄ&'ꢙꢌꢈꢎꢄ#ꢙꢄ0'-)ꢄꢜ
ꢁ% 56#ꢈꢉ-ꢄꢈ6ꢏꢌ#ꢏꢉ)ꢄ&ꢙꢉ-ꢊꢏ#ꢌꢄꢛ0ꢋ30ꢜ9:30ꢝꢞꢄ#ꢙꢄꢇꢐꢊ'#ꢄꢐ#ꢄꢉꢈ$ꢄ'ꢙ&ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉ ꢝ% 0ꢐ&7,ꢏ''ꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄꢒꢙ(ꢍꢐ&#ꢏꢙꢉꢄꢙ,ꢄꢇꢐꢊ'#ꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄ&ꢙꢉ-ꢊꢏ#ꢌ
!ꢈꢄꢎꢈꢌꢈꢎꢇꢈꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢎꢏ)ꢘ#ꢄ#ꢙꢄ&ꢙꢎꢎꢈ&#ꢄ#ꢘꢏꢌꢄ4ꢊꢙ#ꢈꢄ,ꢙꢎꢄꢈꢎꢎꢙꢎꢌꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄꢙꢎꢄꢙ(ꢏꢌꢌꢏꢙꢉꢌ%ꢄꢆ''ꢄ$ꢏꢎꢏꢉ)ꢄ#ꢙꢄ(ꢈꢈ#ꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢎꢈ4ꢊꢏꢎꢈ(ꢈꢉ#ꢌꢄꢙ,ꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢔꢃꢔꢃꢄ:ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢐ'ꢄ 5'ꢈ&#ꢎꢏ&ꢐ'ꢄꢒꢙ-ꢈ%
ꢒꢃꢓꢋꢎꢅꢉꢗꢄ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢀ
ꢄꢕꢔ%ꢃꢃ
ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢔ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢕ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢖ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢁ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢝ
*ꢅ;5ꢒ<ꢄ=ꢆ0/;ꢄꢋ;3
*ꢅ;5ꢒ<ꢄ=ꢆ0/;ꢄ*/==ꢆ;3
>ꢆ<5;ꢅꢆ=ꢄ*/==ꢆ;3
ꢄꢔꢑꢝꢂꢕ%ꢓꢖ
ꢄꢁꢝꢖ%ꢝꢁ
ꢄꢖꢕ%ꢜꢝ>ꢆ<5;ꢅꢆ=ꢄ?ꢄ@A/<5ꢄ<ꢆB
3A0ꢒ/:<;ꢆꢒ<3ꢄ</<ꢆ=ꢀꢁ%$&.+2(ꢂ
/15;ꢋ5ꢆ*ꢄ</<ꢆ=ꢀꢃꢄꢅ
ꢗ;/2ꢅ<ꢄ</<ꢆ=ꢀꢆꢅ
ꢄꢀꢑꢁꢃꢃ%ꢃꢃ
ꢄꢖꢜꢓ%ꢔꢕ
ꢄꢔꢝꢕ%ꢁꢂ
ꢄꢀꢝꢕ%ꢂꢁ%21'ꢄ</<ꢆ=
ꢀꢁꢆꢇꢔꢉꢋꢖꢂꢓꢉꢂꢋꢘꢗꢙꢑꢇꢅꢚꢋCꢁꢑꢝꢓꢓ%ꢃꢃ
ꢛꢂꢃꢍꢃꢇꢔꢚ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢃꢇꢈꢉꢃꢁꢊꢃꢋꢌꢍꢎꢏꢏꢐꢑꢑ
<ꢘꢈꢄꢒꢘꢐꢉ)ꢈꢄ/ꢎ-ꢈꢎꢄꢈ6ꢍꢏꢎꢈꢌꢄꢙꢉꢄ%
!ꢈꢄꢎꢈ4ꢊꢈꢌ#ꢄꢐꢉꢄꢐ--ꢏ#ꢏꢙꢉꢐ'ꢄꢄ-ꢐ+ꢌꢄ"ꢈꢄꢐ--ꢈ-ꢄ#ꢙꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄ&ꢙ(ꢍ'ꢈ#ꢏꢙꢉꢄ-ꢐ#ꢈꢄꢙ,ꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢍꢎꢙDꢈ&#% 3ꢏꢉ&ꢈꢎꢈ'+ꢑ
ꢇꢏ ꢄꢗ' &ꢈꢉ&ꢏ
ꢒꢘꢎꢏꢌ#ꢏꢐꢉ"ꢈ''ꢈꢄ5'ꢈ&#ꢎꢏ&ꢄꢅꢉ&%
ꢗꢐ)ꢈꢄꢀꢄꢙ,ꢄꢀꢒꢙꢉ5ꢌ#ꢄ3ꢙ,#$ꢐꢎꢈꢄ3+ꢌ#ꢈ(ꢌ

ꢈꢂꢉꢊꢋꢌꢇ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢄꢄꢃꢅꢅꢆꢇ
ꢈꢉꢊꢋꢌꢍꢎꢉꢏꢏꢐꢑꢒꢐꢏꢏꢓꢐꢔꢔꢑꢕꢐꢓꢋꢐꢍꢑꢖꢗꢘꢔꢐꢑꢙꢚꢌ
ꢛꢜꢝꢅꢄꢑꢞꢉꢍꢔꢋꢑ ꢋ
ꢈꢉꢊꢋꢌꢍꢎꢉꢏꢏꢐꢑꢕ!ꢑꢑꢝꢄ"ꢝ#
ꢍꢎꢇ ꢕꢁꢃꢅꢅꢛꢛ$ꢑ%ꢏꢐꢊꢋꢍꢉꢊꢘꢏꢑꢈꢘ&ꢏꢋꢑꢂꢏ'(ꢑ)
ꢏꢐꢑꢄꢂꢒꢒꢊꢓꢔꢁꢂꢕꢄꢖꢊꢗꢘꢙꢇꢊꢚꢛꢛꢊꢗꢋꢌꢊꢏꢜꢝꢀꢞ ꢏꢜ!
"#ꢊꢈ$ꢖꢊ%&%'ꢊꢊ""ꢇ'ꢛꢇ"ꢚ
ꢀ(ꢐ)ꢄꢇꢊꢈꢈꢒꢕꢑ%*%ꢕꢙ+,ꢕ!*
ꢝꢐꢆꢄꢁꢘꢐ2
0ꢖꢘꢆ
ꢝꢐꢆꢄꢁꢘꢐ2
3ꢄ)$2ꢆ
ꢞꢐꢉꢂꢁ ꢞꢐꢉꢂꢁ
ꢋꢆꢄ.ꢊ/ *ꢆ+ 01ꢝ *1ꢝ ,ꢘꢕꢄ ꢌꢄ)ꢅꢁꢘ-ꢆꢘꢂꢖ 0ꢖꢘꢆ 3ꢄ)$2ꢆ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ
3ꢜꢞꢎꢍ ꢏꢜꢊ4 0ꢞꢏ
#
ꢆꢅꢅꢄ#ꢄ
ꢆꢅꢅꢄꢇꢝ
ꢆꢅꢅꢆꢛꢅ
ꢆꢅꢅꢄ)ꢆ
%!
%!
%!
%!
%!
3 *!.ꢁ/ꢙꢑ0ꢑꢕꢁꢁ+1,2!ꢙ,ꢁ2
ꢂ!ꢕ67ꢁ%ꢑ1,893!27ꢁ*%ꢑ !21.ꢑ ꢁ,*
8+!ꢈ%*ꢑ/21%+ꢑ3!27ꢁ*%
2ꢆꢅꢃꢂꢁ;ꢑꢖ+%ꢕ! ꢙꢑ%*%ꢕꢙ
ꢂ!ꢕ67ꢁ%ꢑꢂ!ꢕ6ꢞ,**ꢑ9ꢑ3!27ꢁ*%
ꢗ5,ꢗꢛ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑ)-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢇꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑ"-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑ)-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢇꢅ
ꢑ"-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ 3
3 3
3 ꢜ4ꢑ5ꢑꢜ4ꢑ5ꢑꢑꢑꢜ4ꢑ1
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ ꢜ4ꢑ5ꢑꢜ4
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ ꢄꢆꢑꢛ9ꢄ:5"ꢜ:5ꢛꢄ:
ꢜ4ꢑꢑ1ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-"#
ꢑꢑꢙ,ꢙ*%
ꢛꢅꢛ)ꢄ
%!
ꢞꢙ
ꢁ<
ꢞꢙ
ꢞꢙ
3 3
3 %
ꢆ ꢕ7ꢑꢆꢅꢑ1,+ꢃꢂ/+,%1ꢑꢛꢃ1/ꢕꢙꢑꢒ9ꢙ+%2ꢕ7
ꢑꢑꢑꢖꢈꢕꢑ ꢕ7ꢑꢆꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢝ-)ꢇꢛꢄ
ꢑꢅ-ꢇꢄꢄ"
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢆꢛꢆ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛꢆꢜ-)ꢄ
ꢑꢛ-ꢛꢛ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢆ)ꢜ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢛꢅꢇ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢆꢛꢝ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ"ꢜ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-)ꢛ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢛ
ꢑꢅ-ꢜ"
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢜ
ꢆ
ꢆꢅꢅꢆ" ꢁ/2ꢕ%
ꢆ:?ꢜ:ꢒꢑ"ꢅ:1
":
ꢑꢑꢑꢖꢈꢕꢑ=8*/%>ꢑꢕ%3%2ꢙ
ꢆꢅꢅꢅꢆ#ꢆ
ꢆꢅꢅꢅ""ꢜ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛꢜ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-"#
ꢑꢑꢑ1,ꢙꢕ7ꢑꢒ,ꢙꢕ7ꢑ+ꢙꢛꢄꢑꢕ*!.ꢑꢙ+%2ꢕ7
ꢑꢑꢑ+%1ꢑꢙ+%2ꢕ7ꢑꢕ!/ꢙ,ꢁ2ꢑꢙ!ꢖ%
6,ꢗ7
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
3 ꢑꢅ-ꢜꢜ
ꢑꢑꢙ,ꢙ*%
ꢛꢅꢛ)ꢄ
%!
ꢞꢙ
ꢁ<
ꢞꢙ
ꢞꢙ
3 3
3 %
ꢆ ꢕ7ꢑꢆꢅꢑ1,+ꢃꢂ/+,%1ꢑꢛꢃ1/ꢕꢙꢑꢒ9ꢙ+%2ꢕ7
ꢑꢑꢑꢖꢈꢕꢑ ꢕ7ꢑꢆꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢝ-)ꢇꢛꢄ
ꢑꢅ-ꢇꢄꢄ"
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢆꢛꢆ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛꢆꢜ-)ꢄ
ꢑꢛ-ꢛꢛ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢆ)ꢜ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢛꢅꢇ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢆꢛꢝ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ"ꢜ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-)ꢛ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢛ
ꢑꢅ-ꢜ"
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢜ
ꢆ
ꢆꢅꢅꢆ" ꢁ/2ꢕ%
ꢆ:?ꢜ:ꢒꢑ"ꢅ:1
":
ꢑꢑꢑꢖꢈꢕꢑ=8*/%>ꢑꢕ%3%2ꢙ
ꢆꢅꢅꢅꢆ#ꢆ
ꢆꢅꢅꢅ""ꢜ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛꢜ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑ"ꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢑꢑ1,ꢙꢕ7ꢑꢒ,ꢙꢕ7ꢑ+ꢙꢛꢄꢑꢕ*!.ꢑꢙ+%2ꢕ7
ꢑꢑꢑ+%1ꢑꢙ+%2ꢕ7ꢑꢕ!/ꢙ,ꢁ2ꢑꢙ!ꢖ%
6,ꢗ7ꢊ 6ꢌꢊꢗ5,ꢗꢛ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
3 ꢑꢅ-ꢜꢜ
ꢑꢑꢙ,ꢙ*%
ꢛꢅꢛꢇ"
%!
ꢞꢙ
ꢞꢙ
3 3
%
ꢄꢃ1/ꢕꢙꢑꢒ9ꢙ+%2ꢕ7ꢑ0ꢑ+%ꢂ!+ꢑꢑꢑꢑꢆ:ꢑꢖꢈꢕ
ꢑꢑꢑꢖꢈꢕꢑ ꢕ7ꢑꢆꢅꢑꢛꢅ4ꢑ*!,1ꢑ,2ꢑꢙ+%2ꢕ7
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢇ-""ꢇ"
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢄ#ꢅ-ꢛ#
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢆꢝ#
ꢑꢅ-ꢅ""ꢇ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢆꢝ
ꢑꢅ-#ꢛ
ꢆ
ꢆꢅꢅꢅꢅꢅ# ꢄꢆ:ꢒꢑ5ꢑ"ꢜ:1 ꢑꢑꢑ7!21ꢑꢙ+,3ꢑꢁꢞꢑ3!ꢕ7,2%ꢑꢙ+%2ꢕ7ꢑꢃꢑ
!21.
ꢆꢅꢅꢅꢛꢛ)
"ꢝꢅ"ꢇꢅ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑ##-ꢅꢅ
ꢞꢙ
ꢞꢙ
% ꢄꢆ:ꢒꢑ"ꢜ:1
@"
ꢑꢑꢑꢂ!ꢕ67ꢁ%ꢑꢂ!ꢕ6ꢞ,**ꢑ !21.ꢑꢙ+%2ꢕ7 ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢄ)ꢝ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢄꢆꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢆꢄ
ꢑꢛ-"ꢄ3 ꢑꢑꢑ ꢙ%%*ꢑ+%ꢂ!+
ꢕꢗꢍꢉꢔꢋꢉꢘꢓCꢐꢏꢏꢐꢑ%ꢏꢐꢊꢋꢍꢉꢊꢑ,ꢓꢊ- ꢛꢛ#ꢇꢅꢑ,ꢑ!ꢎꢐꢓ&ꢐ
7ꢐꢔAꢐꢍꢉꢘBꢑꢕ!ꢑꢑꢝꢄ"ꢆ#
ꢀ(ꢂꢖꢄꢇꢊ=)ꢜꢅ>ꢑꢝꢆꢇꢃ"ꢆꢆꢆ
8ꢄꢉꢇꢊꢚꢚꢚ-ꢊꢗꢍꢉꢔꢋꢉꢘꢓCꢐꢏꢏꢐ-ꢊꢌD
ꢖꢘ(ꢐꢑꢛꢑꢌEꢑꢄ

!&'ꢉꢋꢑꢙꢍꢘꢉꢏꢑꢕꢌDAꢏꢐꢋꢐ$ꢑꢈꢉꢊꢋꢌꢍꢎꢉꢏꢏꢐꢑꢒꢐꢏꢏꢓꢐꢔꢔꢑꢕꢐꢓꢋꢐꢍꢑꢖꢗꢘꢔꢐꢑꢙꢚꢌꢑꢑ=ꢞꢍꢌFꢐꢓꢑꢂꢉ'$ꢑꢆ))ꢑꢂ,1ꢑꢙ%3ꢖ*!ꢙ%> ꢛꢝꢑꢀ&ꢓꢑꢄꢅꢄ"ꢑꢑꢛꢛ$")$ꢛꢆ ꢀ(ꢐ)ꢄꢇꢊꢈꢈꢒꢕꢑ%*%ꢕꢙ+,ꢕ!*
ꢝꢐꢆꢄꢁꢘꢐ2 ꢝꢐꢆꢄꢁꢘꢐ2 ꢞꢐꢉꢂꢁ ꢞꢐꢉꢂꢁ
ꢋꢆꢄ.ꢊ/ *ꢆ+ 01ꢝ *1ꢝ ,ꢘꢕꢄ ꢌꢄ)ꢅꢁꢘ-ꢆꢘꢂꢖ 0ꢖꢘꢆ 3ꢄ)$2ꢆ 0ꢖꢘꢆ 3ꢄ)$2ꢆ "ꢝꢅ"ꢇꢇ ꢑꢛꢝ-ꢅꢅ ꢞꢙ
ꢞꢙ
%!
ꢞꢙ
ꢁ<
%!
3 ꢑꢑꢑ ꢙ%%*ꢑꢙ,%ꢑꢒ,+% ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢜꢅꢅ ꢑꢛ-ꢛꢆ
ꢆꢅꢅꢅ#ꢅꢝ
"ꢝꢅꢅꢝꢇ
ꢆꢅꢅꢅ""ꢜ
ꢆꢅꢅꢆ"
ꢜ
ꢑꢛ#-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢜ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛꢜ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢆ-ꢄꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢅ
3 3
3 3
3 ꢄꢆ:ꢑꢒ,1% ꢑꢑꢑ":ꢑ !21ꢑꢂ%11,28 ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢄ-ꢛꢜꢄꢝ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢆꢛꢆ
ꢑꢅ-ꢇꢄꢄ"
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛꢄ-ꢝꢇ
ꢑꢅ-ꢜꢜ
ꢑꢅ-ꢛꢄꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢛꢇꢅꢅ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ"ꢜ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢛꢅꢇ
ꢑ)-#ꢄꢅꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢇꢅ
ꢑꢛ-ꢅꢇꢆꢑ5ꢑꢄ
":
ꢑꢑꢑꢕ!+*ꢁ2ꢑ 2!ꢖꢃ*ꢁꢕꢑꢂ! %ꢑ ꢖ!ꢕ%+
ꢑꢑꢑ+%1ꢑꢙ+%2ꢕ7ꢑꢕ!/ꢙ,ꢁ2ꢑꢙ!ꢖ%
ꢑꢑꢑꢖꢈꢕꢑ=8*/%>ꢑꢕ%3%2ꢙ
ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢜ
ꢁ/2ꢕ% ꢑ"-ꢆ# ꢑꢅ-ꢅ#
+%ꢒꢁ+6ꢑ%;, ,ꢙ28ꢑꢕꢁ21/,ꢙ ꢑꢅ-ꢅꢅ ꢑ)-#ꢄ
ꢊ97ꢚ:%' ꢊ'%:&&
ꢕꢗꢍꢉꢔꢋꢉꢘꢓCꢐꢏꢏꢐꢑ%ꢏꢐꢊꢋꢍꢉꢊꢑ,ꢓꢊ- ꢛꢛ#ꢇꢅꢑ,ꢑ!ꢎꢐꢓ&ꢐ
7ꢐꢔAꢐꢍꢉꢘBꢑꢕ!ꢑꢑꢝꢄ"ꢆ#
ꢀ(ꢂꢖꢄꢇꢊ=)ꢜꢅ>ꢑꢝꢆꢇꢃ"ꢆꢆꢆ
8ꢄꢉꢇꢊꢚꢚꢚ-ꢊꢗꢍꢉꢔꢋꢉꢘꢓCꢐꢏꢏꢐ-ꢊꢌD
ꢖꢘ(ꢐꢑꢄꢑꢌEꢑꢄ

VVWC 286 Detail report
RFI detail
#286 Electric Vault Relocation Bldg. 7
Status Closed
Created on
Ball in court
answered
Jun 30, 2023 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Jul 3, 2023 by Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Question
Per the field discussion with CM and AOR the week of 06/19/2023, it was decided that the electrical vault that was put in per survey in the fence line at Bldgs. 6 & 7, needs to be moved/relocated towards Bldg. 7 approximately +/- 24ȋ out of the fence line and to keep it in the landscape area. Please confirm this ASAP as pricing has already been submitted and the fencing needs to continue being installedȋ Official response
Yes, I am good with the suggested relocation of the Electrical Vault to avoid the coflict with the Fence.

Ayman Hanna (ACI) - Jul 3, 2023, 10:37 AM PDT
References
Files (1)
ȏ RFI # 286 Electric Vault Relocation Bldg. 7.pdf
Impact
Cost impact Yes
YesSchedule impact
Other attributes
Priority High
Discipline -
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Jul 3, 2023 at 10:37 AM PDT Page 1 of 3

VVWC 286 Detail report
Category -
-
-
-
Location
Location details
External id
Co-reviewer(s) Ali Nazari (Pacifica)
Ayman Hanna (ACI)
Cruz Baez (Pacifica)
Ed Herrera (Pacifica)
Jay Kwon (ACI)
Luis Diaz (Pacifica)
Myung Chung (CMC)
Nathan Williams (Pacifica)
Rick Hernandez (Pacifica)
Sal Diaz (Pacifica)
Sal Torres (Pacifica)
Scott Webb
Stephan Longoria
Steve Spooner (ACI)
Architect
Construction Manager
Contractor
Executive
Field Inspector
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Superintendent
ACI
CMC
Pacifica
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Jul 3, 2023 at 10:37 AM PDT Page 2 of 3

VVWC 286 Detail report
Activities By At
Ayman Hanna
changed the status from Open Answered to Closed
Ayman
Hanna
Jul 3, 2023, 10:37 AM
PDT
Yes, I am good with the suggested relocation of the Electrical Vault to avoid the conflict with the Fence. MCSubmitted by Myung Chung on Jul 2, 2023 9:15 PM
Ayman
Hanna
Jul 3, 2023, 10:37 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna Ayman
Hanna
Jul 3, 2023, 10:37 AM
PDTchanged the status from Open Answered to Open Answered set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Myung Chung
changed the status from Open In Review to Open Answered Myung Chung
Jul 2, 2023, 9:15 PM
PDTOfficial response: Yes, I am good with the suggested relocation of the Electrical Vault to avoid the coflict with the Fence.

Yes, I am good with the suggested relocation of the Electrical Vault to avoid the coflict with the Fence.

Myung
Chung
Jul 2, 2023, 9:14 PM
PDT
Cruz Baez Jun 30, 2023, 8:00 AM
PDTchanged the status from Open In Review to Open In Review set Ball in court to Myung Chung (CMC).

Cruz Baez
Ayman Hanna added a reference to a file RFI # 286 Electric Vault Relocation Bldg. 7.pdf
Ayman
Hanna
Jun 30, 2023, 7:59 AM
PDT
Ayman Hanna (ACI) created this RFI in Closed status and set Ball in court to Ayman Hanna (ACI).

Ayman
Hanna
Jun 30, 2023, 7:59 AM
PDT
Created by Ayman Hanna with Autodeskp Construction CloudȠ on Jul 3, 2023 at 10:37 AM PDT Page 3 of 3

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Contractor:

RFI No.

RFI Date:

ACI - 286Angeles Contractor, Inc.
783 Phillips Drive 06-30-2023
City of Industry, CA 91748
Construction Manager:

Pacifica Services Inc,
7106 S Mentor Ave #200
Pasadena, CA 91106
Project Name: Victorville Wellness Center
Project No: 2369A
Subject: Electric Vault Relocation Bldg. 7.

Reference:

Drawing No:

Specification:

Tel: (626) 405-0131
Fax:

Respond by: High priority Submitted by: Ayman Hanna
Questions or Clarification:

Please Confirm,
Per the field discussion with CM and AOR the week of 06/19/2023, it was decided that the electrical vault that was put in per survey in the fence line at Bldgs. 6 & 7, needs to be moved/relocated towards Bldg. 7 approximately +/- 24” out of the fence line and to keep it in the landscape area. Please confirm this ASAP as pricing has already been submitted and the fencing needs to continue being installed URGENT, WORK IN PROGRESS.

Proposed Solution / Recommendation:

Potential cost impact?
Response:

Potential schedule impact?Yes No Yes No
Response by:

Date:

ꢀꢁꢆꢇꢔꢉꢋꢕꢂꢖꢉꢂ

12. Cristianbelle, Lift Station & GI Electric
connections. ꢐꢃꢑꢅꢋꢒꢅꢆꢅꢃꢓꢇꢋꢌꢊꢉꢍꢅꢂꢃꢍꢆꢊ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢃꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢊꢉꢋꢌꢊꢉꢍꢅꢂꢃꢍꢋꢎꢇꢍꢏ
ꢀꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢄꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊꢈ
ꢋꢈꢌꢍꢈꢎꢏꢐꢑꢄꢒꢆꢄꢄꢓꢔꢕꢖꢁ
ꢗꢘꢙꢉꢈꢚꢄꢛꢜꢝꢃꢞꢄꢓꢖꢂ ꢕꢖꢖꢖ
!ꢈ"ꢌꢏ#ꢈꢚꢄ$$$%&ꢘꢎꢏꢌ#ꢏꢐꢉ"ꢈ''ꢈ%&ꢙ(
ꢆꢉ)ꢈ'ꢈꢌꢄꢒꢙꢉ#ꢎꢐ&#ꢙꢎꢄꢅꢉ&
ꢜꢂꢕꢄꢗꢘꢏ''ꢏꢍꢌꢄ*ꢎ
ꢔꢓꢄ.ꢊꢉꢈꢄꢔꢃꢔꢕ
.ꢙ"ꢄꢅ*ꢚꢄ./0 ꢔꢃꢔꢔ ꢃꢃꢖꢂ
1ꢏ&#ꢙꢎꢇꢏ''ꢈꢑꢄꢒꢆꢒꢏ#+ꢄꢙ,ꢄꢅꢉ-ꢊꢌ#ꢎ+ꢑꢄꢒꢐꢄꢓꢀꢜꢖꢂ
ꢀꢝꢓꢃꢔꢄ2ꢏꢎꢌ#ꢄ3#
ꢆ##ꢈꢉ#ꢏꢙꢉꢚꢄꢆ+(ꢐꢉꢄꢋꢐꢉꢉꢐ 1ꢏ&#ꢙꢎꢇꢏ''ꢈꢑꢄꢒꢆꢄꢓꢔꢕꢓꢁ
=ꢈꢚꢄꢒꢘꢐꢉ)ꢈꢄ/ꢎ-ꢈꢎꢄꢒ/ ꢃꢃꢀꢔꢄ,ꢙꢎꢚꢄ1ꢏ&#ꢙꢎꢇꢏ''ꢈꢄ!ꢈ''ꢉꢈꢌꢌꢄꢒꢈꢉ#ꢈꢎꢄꢗꢘꢐꢌꢈꢄ<$ꢙ !ꢈꢄꢐꢎꢈꢄꢍ'ꢈꢐꢌꢈ-ꢄ#ꢙꢄ4ꢊꢙ#ꢈꢄꢙꢉꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢐ"ꢙꢇꢈꢄꢒꢘꢐꢉ)ꢈꢄ/ꢎ-ꢈꢎꢄꢒ/ ꢃꢃꢀꢔꢄꢐꢌꢄ,ꢙ''ꢙ$ꢌ% ꢀ% ꢗꢏ&5ꢊꢍꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄ-ꢎꢙꢍꢄꢙ,,ꢄ&ꢙꢉ#ꢎꢙ'ꢄꢍꢐꢉꢈ'
ꢔ% ꢗꢎꢙꢇꢏ-ꢈꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄꢏꢉꢌ#ꢐ''ꢄ&ꢙꢉ#ꢎꢙ'ꢄꢍꢐꢉꢈ'ꢄꢎꢐ&5ꢏꢉ)
ꢕ% ꢅꢉꢌ#ꢐ''ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢄꢙ,ꢄ&ꢙꢉ#ꢎꢙ'ꢄꢍꢐꢉꢈ'ꢄꢙꢉꢄꢎꢐ&5ꢏꢉ)
ꢖ% ꢗꢎꢙꢇꢏ-ꢈꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄꢏꢉꢌ#ꢐ''ꢄꢛꢔꢞꢄꢔ6ꢄꢒꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄꢛꢀꢞꢄꢀ6ꢄꢒꢄ,ꢎꢙ(ꢄ&ꢙꢉ#ꢎꢙ'ꢄꢍꢐꢉꢈ'ꢄ#ꢙꢄ'ꢏ,#ꢄꢌ#ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢄꢇꢐꢊ'# ꢁ% ꢗꢎꢙꢇꢏ-ꢈꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄꢏꢉꢌ#ꢐ''ꢄ783ꢄ,ꢏ##ꢏꢉ)ꢌꢄꢍꢈꢎꢄ&ꢙꢙꢎ-ꢏꢐꢉ#ꢏꢙꢉ
ꢝ% ꢒꢙꢎꢏꢉ)ꢄꢙ,ꢄꢘꢙ'ꢈꢌꢄꢏꢉꢄ'ꢏ,#ꢄꢌ#ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢄꢇꢐꢊ'#ꢄꢐꢌꢄꢉꢈ&ꢈꢌꢌꢐꢎ+ꢄ,ꢙꢎꢄꢏꢉꢌ#ꢐ''ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉ ꢜ% 79&ꢐꢇꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢑꢄ"ꢐ&5,ꢏ''ꢑꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄ&ꢙ(ꢍꢐ&#ꢏꢙꢉ
ꢂ% ꢗꢎꢙꢇꢏ-ꢈꢄ(ꢐꢉꢍꢙ$ꢈꢎꢄ#ꢙꢄꢐꢌꢌꢏꢌ#ꢄ$ꢏ#ꢘꢄ$ꢏꢎꢈꢄꢍꢊ''ꢌꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄ#ꢈꢎ(ꢏꢉꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢌꢄꢙ,ꢄ'ꢏ,#ꢄꢌ#ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢄꢈ4ꢊꢏꢍ(ꢈꢉ# ꢓ% ꢗꢎꢙꢇꢏ-ꢈꢄ(ꢐꢉꢍꢙ$ꢈꢎꢄ,ꢙꢎꢄ'ꢏ,#ꢄꢌ#ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢄꢌ#ꢐꢎꢄꢊꢍ
::ꢄ;/<7::ꢄ79&'ꢊ-ꢈꢌꢄ)ꢈꢉꢈꢎꢐ#ꢙꢎꢄꢎꢈꢉ#ꢐ'ꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄ,ꢊꢈ'ꢄ,ꢙꢎꢄꢌ#ꢐꢎ#ꢄꢊꢍꢄ !ꢈꢄꢎꢈꢌꢈꢎꢇꢈꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢎꢏ)ꢘ#ꢄ#ꢙꢄ&ꢙꢎꢎꢈ&#ꢄ#ꢘꢏꢌꢄ4ꢊꢙ#ꢈꢄ,ꢙꢎꢄꢈꢎꢎꢙꢎꢌꢄꢐꢉ-ꢄꢙꢎꢄꢙ(ꢏꢌꢌꢏꢙꢉꢌ%ꢄꢆ''ꢄ$ꢏꢎꢏꢉ)ꢄ#ꢙꢄ(ꢈꢈ#ꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢎꢈ4ꢊꢏꢎꢈ(ꢈꢉ#ꢌꢄꢙ,ꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢔꢃꢔꢃꢄ;ꢐ#ꢏꢙꢉꢐ'ꢄ 7'ꢈ&#ꢎꢏ&ꢐ'ꢄꢒꢙ-ꢈ%
ꢗꢃꢖꢋꢎꢅꢉꢘꢄ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢀ
ꢄꢂꢃ%ꢃꢃ
ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢔ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢕ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢖ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢁ ꢒꢙ'ꢊ(ꢉꢄꢝ
*ꢅ=7ꢒ<ꢄ>ꢆ0/=ꢄꢋ=3
*ꢅ=7ꢒ<ꢄ>ꢆ0/=ꢄ*/>>ꢆ=3
?ꢆ<7=ꢅꢆ>ꢄ*/>>ꢆ=3
?ꢆ<7=ꢅꢆ>ꢄ@ꢄAB/<7ꢄ<ꢆC
3B0ꢒ/;<=ꢆꢒ<3ꢄ</<ꢆ>
/17=ꢋ7ꢆ*ꢄ</<ꢆ>
ꢗ=/2ꢅ<ꢄ</<ꢆ>
ꢄꢝꢑꢓꢕꢀ%ꢔꢃ
ꢄꢔꢑꢁꢕꢃ%ꢃꢜ
ꢄꢀꢓꢝ%ꢃꢂ
ꢄꢀꢑꢔꢃꢃ%ꢃꢃ
ꢄꢀꢑꢃꢂꢁ%ꢜꢖ
ꢄꢁꢓꢜ%ꢀꢁ
%21'ꢄ</<ꢆ> ꢄꢕꢜꢀ%ꢔꢃ
ꢀꢁꢆꢇꢔꢉꢋꢕꢂꢖꢉꢂꢋꢙꢘꢓꢚꢇꢅꢛꢋDꢀꢔꢑꢓꢀꢔ%ꢃꢃ
ꢜꢂꢃꢍꢃꢇꢔꢛ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢃꢇꢈꢉꢃꢁꢊꢃꢋꢌꢍꢎꢏꢌꢍꢐꢑꢑ
<ꢘꢈꢄꢒꢘꢐꢉ)ꢈꢄ/ꢎ-ꢈꢎꢄꢈ9ꢍꢏꢎꢈꢌꢄꢙꢉꢄꢀꢕ .ꢊ' ꢔꢕ%
!ꢈꢄꢎꢈ4ꢊꢈꢌ#ꢄꢐꢉꢄꢐ--ꢏ#ꢏꢙꢉꢐ'ꢄꢃꢄ-ꢐ+ꢌꢄ"ꢈꢄꢐ--ꢈ-ꢄ#ꢙꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄ&ꢙ(ꢍ'ꢈ#ꢏꢙꢉꢄ-ꢐ#ꢈꢄꢙ,ꢄ#ꢘꢈꢄꢍꢎꢙEꢈ&#% 3ꢏꢉ&ꢈꢎꢈ'+ꢑ
*ꢐꢇꢏ-ꢄꢗ'ꢐ&ꢈꢉ&ꢏꢐ
ꢒꢘꢎꢏꢌ#ꢏꢐꢉ"ꢈ''ꢈꢄ7'ꢈ&#ꢎꢏ&ꢄꢅꢉ&%
ꢗꢐ)ꢈꢄꢀꢄꢙ,ꢄꢀꢒꢙꢉ7ꢌ#ꢄ3ꢙ,#$ꢐꢎꢈꢄ3+ꢌ#ꢈ(ꢌ
Item Number: 9
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communication
Meeting of: October 17, 2023
Submitted By:

Brenda Hampton, Director of Electric Utility Services

Subject:

Approval to execute an amended Interconnection Facilities Agreement (“IFA”) with Southern California Edison (“SCE”).

Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an amended Interconnection Facilities Agreement with Southern California Edison.

Fiscal Impact:

The total cost obligation to amend the IFA with SCE is $197,072. On June 6, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-037, establishing, and adopting the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 annual budget. The amount required to amend the IFA and to satisfy the obligations under this Agreement was included in the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 budget and the funds are available to use and are budgeted in the Electric Purchased Energy Budget line (4202076-53010).

Strategic Plan:

This item reflects Goal E: Invest in Infrastructure. Victorville Municipal Utility Services (“VMUS”) has experienced an increase in the electric usage and peak demand over the last few years and is investing in its infrastructure to increase the capacity to better service the current and future loads.

Background:

VMUS currently provides electric service to customers located at the Southern California Logistics Airport (“SCLA”) via a 33kv SCE interconnection. This line is a radial feed shared with other SCE customers and VMUS is at the end of this feed.

On May 5, 2020, the City Council approved the execution of a combined system impact and facilities study with SCE to evaluate an increase in capacity of the VMUS distribution system at SCLA. VMUS selected the lowest cost option and the most expedient by 2 3
9 3
expanding the current 33kV system, which would increase the available capacity from

18.0 MW to 41.20 MW. The maximum distribution capacity under the new terms of SCE’s Wholesale Distribution Tariff (“WDT”) and IFA is a combined 41.20 MW. The combined capacity will be sufficient to serve the current and anticipated load over the next several years.

WDT 1662 IFA, which was approved by City Council on February 1, 2022, is the Portland distribution line which holds a maximum capacity of 22.36 MW and the existing WDT 298 IFA, is the Cement distribution line which will hold a maximum of 18.84 MW, if approved and amended by City Council. During this process, SCE and VMUS had to revise the current WDT 298 that is in place to reflect the increased capacity from 18 MW to 18.84 MW, and make revisions to the billing and payment procedures.

Discussion:

A System Impact Study on the Cement distribution line was performed by SCE and submitted to Victorville on April 7, 2022. The System Impact Study determined that a protection relay coordination study was needed to serve the incremental additional load of 0.84 MW on the existing Cement 33kV distribution line. The protection relay coordination study concluded that the Cement distribution line would be able to serve the incremental additional load of 0.84 MW.

SCE also determined a true-up of upfront and monthly operation and maintenance costs was required based on the current level of service being provided to VMUS. Upon execution of the amended IFA, SCE will bill Victorville for the amounts which would have been paid based on actual costs and both parties agree that the recovery bill period shall commence as of the March 1, 2019, billing statement. Attachment B provides a breakdown of the estimated, actual, and variant costs between the three Letter Agreements for the interconnection facilities. SCE has previously refunded Victorville for Letter Agreement 1, as shown in Attachment C. The true-up costs are required for Letter Agreement’s 2 and 3. Victorville will owe SCE $193,572.06 for the true-up on Letter Agreement 2 and 3, and an additional $3,500 for the protection relay coordination study, which equates to an amount not to exceed $197,072.06, as shown in Exhibit C of Attachment A.

VMUS is required to have the IFA in place with SCE in order to be able to distribute the energy services to its end users. This amended IFA specifies and consolidates the terms for SCE to provide interconnection, engineer, design, construct, install, own, operate and maintain the interconnection facilities required to provide wholesale load service to VMUS of 18.84 MW, on SCE’s Cement distribution line through WDT 298 IFA. For these reasons, staff is recommending that the Honorable City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the amended IFA with SCE.

Staff remains available for any questions you may have.

Attachments: A. Interconnection Facilities Agreement for WDAT 298 B. Interconnection Facilities Costs
2 3
9 3
C. Refund from SCE for Letter Agreement 1

Attachment A

Interconnection Facilities Agreement

Title Page

Southern California Edison Company FERC FPA Electric Tariff Tariff Title: Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff
Tariff Record Title: First Revised Service Agreement No. 231

SCLA DEVELOPMENT WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION LOAD

AMENDED INTERCONNECTION FACILITIES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CITY OF VICTORVILLE

AND

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

Contract Effective Date: 08/17/2009 Tariff Record Proposed Effective Date: 5-1-19 905.231.4 Version Number: 15.0.0
WDT298 Option Code: A

SCLA DEVELOPMENT WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION LOAD

AMENDED INTERCONNECTION FACILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AND

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Parties: .......................................................................................................................................... 5

2. Recitals: ........................................................................................................................................ 5

3. Agreement: ................................................................................................................................... 7

4. Definitions: ................................................................................................................................... 7

5. Effective Date And Term: ......................................................................................................... 10

6. Agreement Pursuant To The WDAT: ...................................................................................... 11

7. Creditworthiness: ...................................................................................................................... 11

8. Interconnection Facilities: ......................................................................................................... 12

9. Capital Additions: ...................................................................................................................... 13

10. Removal Of Interconnection Facilities: ................................................................................... 14

11. Other Taxes: ............................................................................................................................... 14

12. Charges: ...................................................................................................................................... 14

13. Billing And Payment: ................................................................................................................ 14

14. Addresses For Billing And Payment: ....................................................................................... 17

15. Disputes: ..................................................................................................................................... 18

16. Audits: ......................................................................................................................................... 18

17. Operating Representatives: ...................................................................................................... 18

18. Regulatory Authority: ............................................................................................................... 19

19. No Dedication Of Facilities: ...................................................................................................... 19

20. No Third Party Rights: ............................................................................................................. 19

21. Relationship Of Parties: ............................................................................................................ 20

22. Waivers: ...................................................................................................................................... 20

23. Governing Law: ......................................................................................................................... 20

24. Notices: ........................................................................................................................................ 20

25. Severability: ................................................................................................................................ 20

26. Entire Agreement: ..................................................................................................................... 21

27. Ambiguities: ............................................................................................................................... 21

28. Signature Clause: ....................................................................................................................... 21

SCLA DEVELOPMENT WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION LOAD

AMENDED INTERCONNECTION FACILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AND

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)

Exhibit A-1. Interconnection Facilities Description and Costs: ..................................................... 21 Exhibit B. Monthly Charges: ....................................................................................................... 25 Exhibit C. Payment Summary: .................................................................................................... 27 Exhibit D. One-Line Diagram: .................................................................................................... 28

SCLA DEVELOPMENT WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION LOAD

AMENDED INTERCONNECTION FACILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AND

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

1. Parties:

The Parties to this SCLA Development Wholesale Distribution Load Amended Interconnection Facilities Agreement (“Amended Agreement”) are City of Victorville, (“Victorville”), a municipality in the state of California, and Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”), a California corporation, hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals:

This Amended Agreement is made with reference to the following facts, among others:

2.1. SCE is a California public utility engaged in the business of generating and transmitting electric energy in the States of Arizona, California, Nevada, and New Mexico. SCE is further engaged in the business of distributing such energy in the State of California.

2.2. Victorville is a municipality in the state of California.

2.3. Victorville serves customers in a development known as the Southern California Logistics Airport (“SCLA”) Development, located within the city of Victorville.

2.4. Victorville has submitted various requests to SCE in accordance with SCE’s WDAT for interconnection and wholesale Distribution Service from the ISO Grid.

2.5. Victorville and SCE entered into Letter Agreement No. 1 (“Letter Agreement No. 1”) on March 8, 2009, which provided for SCE to commence the engineering, design, preparation of specifications, procurement and construction for the interconnection facilities and any system upgrades required to provide the requested service to Victorville for up to 1.25 MW of load at the SCLA Development by August 17, 2009 via SCE’s Cement 33 kV distribution line. Letter Agreement No. 1 was filed at FERC on March 18, 2009 under Docket No. ER09-860-000 and was accepted by FERC on April 27, 2009.

2.6. The Parties entered into an Interconnection Facilities Agreement on August 13, 2009 (“IFA for WDT298”). The IFA for WDT298 specified the terms for SCE to provide interconnection, engineer, design, construct, install, own, operate and maintain the Interconnection Facilities, and any Distribution Upgrades, needed to provide the requested service, and for Victorville to pay for such facilities.

2.7. Similarly, the Parties entered into a Service Agreement on August 13, 2009 (“SA for WDT298”). The SA for WDT298 allowed for the implementation of wholesale Distribution Service under SCE's WDAT. The IFA for WDT298 and SA for WDT298 superseded Letter Agreement No. 1 and were filed at FERC on August

20, 2009 under Docket No. ER09-1611-000 and were accepted by FERC on October 2, 2009.

2.8. Victorville and SCE entered into Letter Agreement No. 2 (“Letter Agreement No. 2”) on August 13, 2009, which provided for SCE to engineer, design, procure, and construct additional upgrades required to provide service for the SCLA Development to a capability of 9.25 MW and for Victorville to pay for such work.

Letter Agreement No. 2 was filed at FERC on August 20, 2009 under Docket No.

ER09-1610-000 and was accepted by FERC on October 2, 2009.

2.9. Victorville and SCE entered into Letter Agreement No. 3 (“Letter Agreement No. 3”) on June 30, 2011, which provided for SCE to engineer, design, procure, and construct additional upgrades required to provide service for the SCLA Development to a capability of 18.0 MW and for Victorville to pay for such work.

Letter Agreement No. 3 was filed at FERC on November 15, 2012 under Docket No. ER13-381-000 and was accepted by FERC on December 12, 2012.

2.10. Victorville requested an increase in the existing wholesale load from 18.0 MW to

40.36 MW, or an increase in incremental wholesale load service of 22.36 MW.

2.11. A combined System Impact and Facilities Study (“Combined Study”) was performed by SCE and submitted to Victorville on August 21, 2020. The Combined Study determined that a line extension will need to be constructed to serve the incremental additional wholesale load of 22.36 MW and that the incremental additional wholesale load of 22.36 MW would need to be served via SCE’s Portland 33 kV distribution line while the existing wholesale load of 18.0 MW will continue to be served via SCE’s Cement 33 kV distribution line under the existing IFA for WDT298 and SA for WDT298.

2.12. The Parties entered into an Interconnection Facilities Agreement on February 2, 2022 (“Portland 33 kV IFA”). The Portland 33 kV IFA specified the terms for SCE to provide interconnection, engineer, design, construct, install, own, operate and maintain the Interconnection Facilities, and any Distribution Upgrades, needed to provide the requested service for the incremental additional wholesale load of 22.36 MW, and for Victorville to pay for such facilities.

2.13. Similarly, the Parties entered into a Service Agreement on February 2, 2022 (“Portland 33 kV SA”). The Portland 33 kV SA allowed for the implementation of wholesale Distribution Service under SCE's WDAT. The Portland 33 kV IFA and Portland 33 kV SA were filed at FERC on February 18, 2022 under Docket No.

ER22-1080-000 and were accepted by FERC on April 11, 2022.

2.14. Prior to the Interconnections Facilities In-Service Date related to the Portland 33 kV IFA, SCE agreed to evaluate whether an additional 0.84 MW of wholesale load service can be provided at the existing Cement 33 kV line under the existing IFA for WDT298.

2.15. A System Impact Study (“System Impact Study”) was performed by SCE and submitted to Victorville on April 7, 2022. The System Impact Study determined that a protection relay coordination study was needed to serve the incremental additional load of 0.84 MW on the existing Cement 33 kV distribution line.

2.16. The Parties now desire to enter into this Amended Agreement to accommodate the incremental 0.84 MW additional wholesale load from 18.0 MW to 18.84 MW on

the existing Cement 33 kV distribution line. This Amended Agreement specifies and consolidates the terms for SCE to provide interconnection, engineer, design, construct, install, own, operate and maintain the Interconnection Facilities needed to provide wholesale load service of 18.84 MW on SCE’s Cement 33 kV distribution line, and for Victorville to pay for such facilities based on SCE’s final accounting of costs associated with the Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades, as reflected in Exhibit A.

3. Agreement:

In consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:

4. Definitions:

All terms with initial capitalization not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in SCE’s WDAT as that Tariff may be amended from time to time. The following terms, when used herein with initial capitalization, whether in the singular or the plural, shall have the meanings specified:

4.1. Accounting Practice: Generally accepted accounting principles and practices applicable to electric utility operations.

4.2. Amended Agreement: This Amended SCLA Development Wholesale Distribution Load Interconnection Facilities Agreement between Victorville and SCE specifying and consolidating providing terms for wholesale load service of 18.84 MW on SCE’s Cement 33 kV distribution line.

4.3. Capital Additions: Any Units of Property which are added to the Interconnection Facilities; the enlargement, modification or betterment of any Units of Property constituting a part of the Interconnection Facilities; or the replacement of any Units of Property constituting a part of the Interconnection Facilities, irrespective of whether such replacement constitutes an enlargement, modification or betterment of that which it replaces; the costs of which additions, enlargements, modifications, betterments or replacements in accordance with Accounting Practice would be capitalized and have not previously been included in the Interconnection Facilities Cost.

4.4. Capital Additions Cost: All costs, excluding ITCC and One-Time Cost, determined by SCE to be associated with the design, engineering, procurement, construction and installation of Capital Additions.

4.5. Capital Additions Payment: The sum of the Capital Additions Cost, associated ITCC and associated One-Time Cost.

4.6. CPUC: The California Public Utilities Commission, or its regulatory successor.

4.7. Credit Provider: Provider of any Credit Support.

4.8. Credit Support: Parent guarantee, letter of credit, surety bond, or other security meeting the requirements of Section 7.2.

4.9. Customer-Financed Monthly Rate for Non-ISO-Controlled Facilities: The rate most recently adopted by the CPUC for application to SCE’s retail electric customers for customer-financed added facilities, which does not compensate SCE for replacement of added facilities. The Customer-Financed Monthly Rate for Non- ISO-Controlled Facilities is stated in Attachment J of the WDAT.

4.10. Delivery Upgrades: ISO Grid facilities, as specified in Exhibit A, consisting of the transmission facilities, other than Reliability Upgrades, necessary to relieve constraints on the ISO Grid and to facilitate the delivery of energy through the ISO Grid to load, as such facilities may be modified during the term of this Agreement.

4.11. Delivery Upgrades Cost: All costs, excluding ITCC and One-Time Cost, determined by SCE to be associated with the design, engineering, procurement, construction and installation of the Delivery Upgrades. The Delivery Upgrades Cost is provided in Exhibit B.

4.12. Delivery Upgrades In-Service Date: The date upon which the construction of the Delivery Upgrades is complete and such facilities are successfully tested and ready for service.

4.13. Delivery Upgrades Payment: The sum of the Delivery Upgrades Cost, associated ITCC and associated One-Time Cost. The Delivery Upgrades Payment is provided in Exhibit B.

4.14. Distribution System Facilities: Facilities within SCE’s Distribution System beyond the Point of Receipt, as specified in Exhibit A-3 and as shown in Exhibit D, necessary to interconnect the SCLA Development safely and reliably to SCE’s Distribution System, which facilities would not be necessary but for the interconnection of the SCLA Development.

4.15. Distribution System Facilities Cost: All costs, excluding ITCC and One-Time Cost, determined by SCE to be associated with the design, engineering, procurement, construction and installation of the Distribution System Facilities.

The Distribution System Facilities Cost is provided in Exhibit A.

4.16. Distribution System Facilities In-Service Date: The date upon which the construction of the Distribution System Facilities is complete and such facilities are successfully tested and ready for service.

4.17. Distribution System Facilities Payment: The sum of the Distribution System Facilities Cost, associated ITCC and associated One-Time Cost. The Distribution System Facilities Payment is provided in Exhibit A.

4.18. FERC: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or its regulatory successor.

4.19. SCLA Development: All equipment and facilities comprising Victorville’s distribution system serving the End-Use Customers’ loads within the SCLA.

4.20. Interconnection Facilities: Facilities, as specified in Exhibit A and as shown in Exhibit D, owned by SCE to interconnect the Victorville distribution system serving the SCLA Development to the Distribution System, as such facilities may be modified during the term of this Amended Agreement.

4.21. Interconnection Facilities Charge: The monthly charge to Victorville to recover the revenue requirements for the Interconnection Facilities, calculated as the product of the Customer-Financed Monthly Rate for Non-ISO-Controlled Facilities and the Interconnection Facilities Cost.

4.22. Interconnection Facilities Cost: All costs, excluding ITCC and One-Time Cost, determined by SCE to be associated with the design, engineering, procurement, construction and installation of the Interconnection Facilities. The Interconnection Facilities Cost is provided in Exhibit B.

4.23. Interconnection Facilities In-Service Date: The date upon which the construction of the initially-installed Interconnection Facilities for temporary service is complete and such facilities are successfully tested and ready for service.

4.24. Interconnection Facilities Payment: The sum of the Interconnection Facilities Cost, associated ITCC and associated One-Time Cost. The Interconnection Facilities Payment is provided in Exhibit B.

4.25. ITCC: The Income Tax Component of Contribution specified in the Preliminary Statement, Part M of SCE’s tariff on file with the CPUC, applicable to the Interconnection Facilities Cost, Delivery Upgrades Cost, Distribution System Facilities Cost, Reliability Upgrades Cost, and Capital Additions Cost. The ITCC applicable to the Interconnection Facilities Cost, Delivery Upgrades Cost, Distribution System Facilities Cost and Reliability Upgrades Cost is provided in Exhibit B.

4.26. Letter Agreement No. 1: The letter agreement between Victorville and SCE dated March 8, 2009 filed at FERC under Docket No. ER09-860 which provided load service of up to 1.25 MW.

4.27. Letter Agreement No. 2: The letter agreement between Victorville and SCE dated August 13, 2009 filed at FERC under Docket No. ER09-1610 which provided load service of up to 9.25 MW.

4.28. Letter Agreement No. 3: The letter agreement between Victorville and SCE dated June 30, 2011 filed at FERC under Docket No. ER13-381 which provided load service of up to 18.0 MW.

4.29. One-Time Cost: All costs determined by SCE to be associated with the installation of Interconnection Facilities, Delivery Upgrades, Distribution System Facilities, Reliability Upgrades, or Capital Additions which are not capitalized. The Interconnection Facilities One-Time Cost, Delivery Upgrades One-Time Cost, Distribution System Facilities One-Time Cost and Reliability Upgrades One-Time Cost are provided in Exhibit B.

4.30. Reliability Upgrades: ISO Grid Facilities, as specified in Exhibit A-4, excluding the Delivery Upgrades, necessary to interconnect the SCLA Development safely and reliably to SCE’s electrical system and the ISO Grid, which facilities would not be necessary but for the interconnection of the SCLA Development, including without limitation, upgrades necessary to remedy short circuit or stability problems resulting from the interconnection of the SCLA Development to SCE’s electrical system and the ISO Grid.

4.31. Reliability Upgrades Cost: All costs, excluding ITCC and One-Time Cost, determined by SCE to be associated with the design, engineering, procurement, construction and installation of the Reliability Upgrades. The Reliability Upgrades Cost is provided in Exhibit B.

4.32. Reliability Upgrades In-Service Date: The date upon which the construction of the Reliability Upgrades is complete and such facilities are successfully tested and

ready for service.

4.33. Reliability Upgrades Payment: The sum of the Reliability Upgrades Cost, associated ITCC and associated One-Time Cost. The Reliability Upgrades Payment is provided in Exhibit B.

4.34. Removal Cost: The actual cost SCE incurs for the removal of the Interconnection Facilities, which is calculated as the amount, if positive, of the costs of removal minus the salvage value of the Interconnection Facilities.

4.35. Service Agreement: The Amended Service Agreement For Wholesale Distribution Service between the Parties executed concurrently herewith specifying and consolidating providing terms for wholesale load service of 18.84 MW on SCE’s Cement 33 kV distribution line.

4.36. Units of Property: As described in FERC's “List of Units of Property for Use in Connection with Uniform System of Accounts Prescribed for Public Utilities and Licensees” in effect as of the date of this Agreement, and as such list may be amended from time to time.

4.37. WDAT: SCE's Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff.

5. Effective Date And Term:

5.1. This Amended Agreement shall become effective upon the effective date ordered by FERC (“Effective Date”).

5.2. This Amended Agreement shall terminate on the earliest of (i) the termination date of the Service Agreement, (ii) the date specified by Victorville upon one hundred eighty (180) calendar days advance written notice to SCE if the notice of termination is received by SCE on or after the Interconnection Facilities In-Service Date, (iii) the date specified by Victorville upon thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice to SCE if the notice of termination is received by SCE before the Interconnection Facilities In-Service Date, or (iv) the date specified by SCE pursuant to Sections 8.7 or 13.4.

5.3. Any obligations of one Party to the other, including payment obligations, as a result of this Amended Agreement, which accrued prior to or as a result of termination of this Amended Agreement, shall survive termination.

5.4. If Victorville has given notice of termination and a filing with FERC is required to terminate this Amended Agreement, Victorville shall support such filing before the FERC if requested by SCE.

5.5. Upon termination of this Amended Agreement, Victorville shall pay SCE any remaining balance owed for SCE’s costs incurred or irrevocably committed to be incurred pursuant to this Agreement as of the effective date of termination, including any costs incurred by SCE to restore its electrical system and any system design drawings to their prior condition, within sixty (60) calendar days following receipt of a billing from SCE requiring such payment. Such billing shall reflect all payments received by SCE, which shall be credited against the amount of SCE's costs and expenses incurred or irrevocably committed to be incurred in accordance with this Agreement.

5.6. As noted in Section 2.7, the IFA for WDT298 and SA for WDT298 superseded Letter Agreement No. 1 and were filed at FERC on August 20, 2009 under Docket No. ER09-1611-000 and were accepted by FERC on October 2, 2009. Letter Agreement No. 2 and Letter Agreement No. 3 will terminate upon the Effective Date.

6. Agreement Pursuant To the WDAT:

This Amended Agreement provides terms regarding Interconnection Facilities, Delivery Upgrades, Distribution System Facilities and Reliability Upgrades associated with wholesale Distribution Service pursuant to the WDAT. Accordingly, the rights and obligations of the Parties pursuant to this Agreement are subject to applicable provisions of the WDAT, including without limitation its provisions regarding indemnification and Uncontrollable Force, in addition to the provisions of this Agreement. In case of a conflict in the terms contained in this Agreement and the terms in the WDAT, the terms of the WDAT shall apply. Victorville has read and is familiar with the terms of the WDAT.

7. Creditworthiness:

7.1. Upon the Effective Date and until all payment obligations of Victorville to SCE under this Amended Agreement and the Service Agreement, including any obligation to pay the Removal Cost in accordance with Sections 10.2, 12.1, and

13.2 have been finally and irrevocably paid after the termination date pursuant to Section 5, Victorville shall either maintain an unsecured long-term debt rating of A2 or higher from Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or A or higher from Standard and Poor’s Corporation (“S&P”) or provide and maintain additional security as described in Section 7.2 clauses (b) through (e).

7.2. Upon the Effective Date, Victorville shall provide to SCE, in a form that is acceptable to SCE in its sole discretion, (a) evidence that Victorville has one of the ratings specified in Section 7.1; (b) an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee of Victorville’s obligations from a parent company of Victorville that has an unsecured long-term debt rating of A2 or higher from Moody’s or A or higher from S&P, together with evidence of one of such ratings; (c) an unconditional and irrevocable letter of credit in US dollars from a depository institution organized under the laws of the United States of America or any State (or any domestic branch of a foreign bank), which (i) has either (A) a long-term unsecured debt rating of A or higher by S&P or A2 or higher by Moody’s or (B) a certificate of deposit rating of A-1+ by S&P and P-1 by Moody’s, and (ii) whose deposits are insured by the FDIC, together with evidence of such ratings; (d) an unconditional and irrevocable surety bond in US dollars issued by an insurance company that has and maintains an Insurance Financial Strength rating of A2 or higher from Moody’s or A or higher from S&P, and is rated no less than A- (with a minimum size rating of VIII) by Best’s Insurance Guide and Key Ratings, together with evidence of such

ratings or (e) other security that is acceptable to SCE in its sole discretion. Cash deposits shall be an acceptable form of security.

7.3. Until all payment obligations of Victorville to SCE under this Agreement and the Service Agreement, including any obligation to pay the Removal Cost in accordance with Sections 10.2, 12.1 and 13.2, have been finally and irrevocably paid after the termination date pursuant to Section 5, Victorville shall provide to SCE, within ten (10) calendar days after June 30 and December 31 of each year, evidence of the then current applicable ratings of Victorville or the Credit Provider of any Credit Support being maintained for the benefit of SCE hereunder; and if any such applicable rating is reduced at any time, Victorville shall notify SCE in writing within five (5) calendar days after such reduction.

7.4. Any Credit Support provided hereunder shall be payable in at least the amount specified in Section 7.5, and shall be issued in favor of or for the benefit of SCE and its successors and assignees, and shall state that it may be drawn upon in whole or in part by SCE or its successors or assignees at any time (i) if a substitute Credit Support meeting the requirements of Section 7.2 is not provided within ten (10) calendar days after any reduction in the applicable rating of the Credit Provider meeting the requirements of Section 7.2 below the level specified herein; (ii) if a substitute Credit Support has not been provided at least thirty (30) calendar days before any expiration of the Credit Support; or (iii) upon any failure by Victorville to make any payment required by this Agreement and the Service Agreement when due and following the expiration of any applicable cure period, pursuant to Section

13.4. 7.5. The amount available to be drawn under any Credit Support shall be equal to $3,800. The disposition of any released Credit Support shall be directed by Victorville.

7.6. In addition to the provisions described above, any Credit Support provided hereunder shall contain such terms, conditions, waivers, representations, covenants, and other provisions as may be customary for similar instruments delivered in the State of California, as approved by SCE in its reasonable discretion.

8. Interconnection Facilities:

8.1. Victorville is responsible for performing, at its cost, the Work to Be Performed by Victorville, as set forth in Exhibit A hereof.

8.2. Victorville shall make all necessary arrangements for easements required in order for SCE to comply with its obligations under this Agreement. SCE shall provide forms of easement agreements for execution by affected property owners.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, SCE shall have no obligation to install the Interconnection Facilities prior to the effective date of such easement agreements.

8.3. SCE shall design, engineer, procure, construct, install and own the Interconnection Facilities, and any Delivery Upgrades, Distribution System Facilities and Reliability Upgrades pursuant to Good Utility Practice and apply for any regulatory

approvals necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Interconnection Facilities, Delivery Upgrades, Distribution System Facilities and Reliability Upgrades.

8.4. SCE shall use commercially reasonable efforts to accommodate the incremental

0.84 MW additional wholesale load from 18.0 MW to 18.84 MW on the existing Cement 33 kV distribution line.

8.5. The maximum capacity of the Interconnection Facilities made available by SCE to Victorville for the purpose of interconnecting and delivering energy and other services from the ISO under this Amended Agreement shall be 18.84 MW.

Victorville acknowledges that if Victorville wishes to increase the amount of Distribution Service provided pursuant to this Amended Agreement and the Service Agreement, Victorville shall be required to submit a new application for Distribution Service in accordance with the terms and conditions of the WDAT.

8.6. Victorville shall not cause the SCLA Development to operate in parallel with or to interconnect to any other electrical facilities, which facilities shall include, but not be limited to, Victorville’s distribution systems served under other WDAT interconnection facilities agreements or service agreements, any generating facilities, including Victorville’s existing generators, other SCE facilities, or any facilities served by other electric utilities without receiving prior review and authorization from SCE. If Victorville fails to comply with the requirements set forth in this Section 8.7, then SCE shall have the right to terminate this Amended Agreement, subject to FERC acceptance or approval.

8.7. Victorville shall cause its electrical facilities to be a balanced system across all three phases.

8.8. This Amended Agreement governs the facilities required to interconnect Victorville’s distribution system serving the SCLA Development to SCE’s 33 kV Cement distribution line pursuant to the WDAT and as described herein.

Victorville shall be responsible for making all necessary operational arrangements with the ISO, including, without limitation, arrangements for obtaining transmission service from the ISO, and for scheduling delivery of energy and other services from the ISO Grid. Victorville shall be responsible for all costs associated with such arrangements.

9. Capital Additions:

9.1. SCE shall engineer, design, construct, install, own, operate and maintain all Capital Additions pursuant to Good Utility Practice.

9.2. Except as otherwise provided in Section 9.3, whenever Capital Additions are required by SCE pursuant to Good Utility Practice (which may include compliance with system or regulatory requirements), Victorville shall pay all charges associated with such Capital Additions in accordance with Section 12.1 and 13.1.4.

9.3. In the event that Capital Additions are required in order to benefit SCE, or because of damage caused by negligence or willful misconduct of SCE, Victorville shall not bear cost responsibility for such Capital Additions. No adjustment will be made to

the Interconnection Facilities Cost; and no Capital Additions Cost, ITCC, or One- Time Cost will be charged to Victorville for such Capital Additions.

10. Removal Of Interconnection Facilities:

10.1. Following termination of this Amended Agreement, SCE will remove the Interconnection Facilities from service to Victorville.

10.2. On or before the date one year following termination of this Amended Agreement, SCE shall notify Victorville whether SCE intends to physically remove the Interconnection Facilities or any part thereof. If SCE intends to physically remove the Interconnection Facilities or any part thereof, then SCE shall physically remove such facilities within two years from the date of notification of intent, and Victorville shall pay the Removal Cost in accordance with Sections 12.1 and 13.2.

If SCE does not intend to physically remove the Interconnection Facilities or any part thereof, then Victorville shall have no obligation to pay such Removal Cost.

11. Other Taxes:

Victorville shall be solely responsible for any taxes (including, but not limited to, property tax, sales and use tax, excise tax, and document transfer tax) that are asserted against any payments or asset transfers made by Victorville to SCE under this Amended Agreement for Interconnection Facilities, Delivery Upgrades, Distribution System Facilities, Reliability Upgrades and Capital Additions. SCE and Victorville shall cooperate in good faith to appeal, protest, seek abatement of, or otherwise contest other taxes associated against payments or asset transfers made by Victorville to SCE under this Amended Agreement for Interconnection Facilities, Delivery Upgrades, Distribution System Facilities, Reliability Upgrades and Capital Additions.

12. Charges:

12.1. Victorville shall pay to SCE the following charges in accordance with this Amended Agreement: (a) Interconnection Facilities Payment; (b) Reliability Upgrades Payment, if any; (c) Delivery Upgrades Payment, if any; (d) Distribution System Facilities Payment, if any; (e) Interconnection Facilities Charge; (f) Capital Additions Payment; (g) any reimbursable FERC fees pursuant to Section 18.3; (h) Removal Cost pursuant to Section 13.2; (i) other taxes pursuant to Section 11; and (j) termination charges pursuant to Section 5.5.

12.2. The Interconnection Facilities Cost, Delivery Upgrades Cost, Distribution System Facilities Cost, Reliability Upgrades Cost, Capital Additions Cost, One-Time Cost, ITCC and Removal Cost shall be compiled in accordance with Accounting Practice.

12.3. If, during the term of this Amended Agreement, SCE executes an agreement to provide service to another entity (other than retail load) which contributes to the

need for the Interconnection Facilities, Delivery Upgrades, Distribution System Facilities or Reliability Upgrades, the charges due hereunder may be adjusted to appropriately reflect such service based on SCE’s cost allocation principles in effect at such time and shall be subject to FERC approval.

13. Billing And Payment:

13.1. Billing Procedure.

13.1.1. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, commencing on or following the Effective Date, SCE will render bills to Victorville for charges under this Amended Agreement, and Victorville shall pay such bills, in accordance with the Billing and Payment provisions of the WDAT.

13.1.2. As further reflected in Section 13.1.8, SCE has determined the actual recorded Interconnection Facilities Cost, Delivery Upgrades Cost, Distribution System Facilities Cost, Reliability Upgrades Cost or Capital Additions Cost, including the associated One-Time Cost and ITCC. The difference between actual recorded costs and SCE’s previous cost estimates is reflected in Exhibit A. The difference between actual costs and estimated costs associated with Letter Agreement 1 has been refunded to Victorville as of July 1, 2010. The remaining difference between actual costs and estimated costs under this Amended Agreement is shown in Exhibit C.

13.1.3. Each month following the Effective Date, SCE will render bills to Victorville for the Interconnection Facilities Charge. The initial bill for the Interconnection Facilities Charge shall reflect all previously due Interconnection Facilities Charge payments, as further described in Section 13.1.8.2. The Interconnection Facilities Charge for the last month of service hereunder shall be pro-rated based on the number of days in which service was provided during said months.

13.1.4. SCE will bill Victorville for the Capital Additions Payment prior to commencing any work on any Capital Additions in accordance with Section 9.2; provided that, at SCE’s sole discretion, SCE may bill Victorville for the Capital Additions Payment after commencing such work if SCE determines that Capital Additions are required in accordance with safety or regulatory requirements or to preserve system integrity or reliability. Such billing shall initially be based on SCE’s cost estimates and shall be subject to later adjustment pursuant to Sections 13.1.8.1 and

13.1.8.2. 13.1.5. Except as otherwise provided in Section 9.3, if certain Interconnection Facilities are removed to accommodate such Capital Additions and such removal results in a change in the Interconnection Facilities Cost, the Interconnection Facilities Charge shall be adjusted as of the in-service date of such Capital Additions to reflect the change in the Interconnection Facilities Cost.

13.1.6. Except as otherwise provided in Section 9.3, if such Capital Additions result in an increase in the Interconnection Facilities Cost, then the Interconnection Facilities Charge, shall be adjusted as of the in-service date of such Capital Additions to reflect the change in such costs.

13.1.7. Commencing on the Effective Date, SCE will render bills to Victorville for any reimbursable FERC fees in accordance with Section 18.3. Such billing shall be for any reimbursable FERC fees or costs incurred since the preceding billing.

13.1.8. As reflected in Exhibit A and further described below, SCE has determined the actual recorded Interconnection Facilities Cost, Delivery Upgrades Cost, Distribution System Facilities Cost, Reliability Upgrades Cost or Capital Additions Cost, including the associated One-Time Cost and ITCC. SCE will provide Victorville a final invoice for past due payments.

13.1.8.1. As reflected in Exhibit A, SCE has determined that the amounts paid for the total estimated Interconnection Facilities Payment, Delivery Upgrades Payment, Distribution System Facilities Payment, Reliability Upgrades Payment, or the Capital Additions Payment are less than the amounts due for the total actual Interconnection Facilities Payment, Delivery Upgrades Payment, Distribution System Facilities Payment, Reliability Upgrades Payment, or the Capital Additions
Payment, as determined from the actual recorded
Interconnection Facilities Cost, Delivery Upgrades Cost, Distribution System Facilities Cost, Reliability Upgrades Cost, or the Capital Additions Cost, including the associated One-Time Cost and ITCC. The remaining difference between the amounts previously paid by Victorville as estimated costs and the actual recorded costs is shown in Exhibit C. SCE will bill Victorville this amount, without interest, within three (3) months of the Effective Date.

13.1.8.2. As of the execution date of this Amended Agreement, Victorville has not made any payments for the Interconnection Facilities Charge. As a result, within three (3) months of the Effective Date, SCE will bill Victorville for the amounts which would have been paid based on actual recorded costs, without interest. For purposes of this true-up of past payments for the Interconnection Facilities Charge, the Parties agree that the recovery period shall commence as of the March 1, 2019 billing statement.

13.1.9. Charges for payments upon termination shall be billed and paid as provided in Section 5.

13.2. Removal Cost.

13.2.1. If, in accordance with Section 10.2, SCE decides to physically remove the Interconnection Facilities, SCE shall render a bill to Victorville for the Removal Cost. Victorville shall pay the Removal Cost in accordance with Section 12.1. Such billing shall be initially based on SCE’s estimate of the Removal Cost. Within 12 months following the removal of the Interconnection Facilities, SCE shall determine the recorded Removal Cost and provide Victorville with a final invoice.

13.2.2. If the amount paid for the Removal Cost is less than the amount due for the Removal Cost as determined from the actual recorded Removal Cost, SCE will bill Victorville for the difference between the amount previously paid by Victorville and the amount which would have been paid based on actual recorded costs, without interest, within twenty (20) calendar days of the date of such invoice.

13.2.3. If the amount paid for the Removal Cost is greater than the amount due for the Removal Cost as determined from the actual recorded Removal Cost, SCE will refund Victorville the difference between the amount previously paid by Victorville and the amount which would have been paid based on actual recorded costs, without interest, within twenty (20) calendar days of the date of such invoice.

13.3. Interest On Unpaid Balances.

Interest on any unpaid amounts shall be calculated in accordance with the methodology specified in the Interest on Unpaid Balances provision of the WDAT.

13.4. Default And Billing Dispute.

Any default or billing dispute shall be handled in accordance with the methodology specified in the Customer Default provision of the WDAT, including, without limitation, the provision for termination upon default, subject to FERC approval.

14. Addresses For Billing And Payment:

14.1. All payments to be made by Victorville to SCE shall be sent to:

Southern California Edison Company
Accounts Receivable
Box 600
Rosemead, California 91770-0600

SCE may, at any time, by written notice to Victorville pursuant to Section 6 of the Service Agreement for Wholesale Distribution Service, change the address to which payments will be sent.

14.2. All billings to be presented by SCE to Victorville shall be sent to:

City of Victorville
Attn: Victorville Municipal Utility Services
P.O. Box 5001
Victorville, California 92323

Victorville may, at any time, by written notice to SCE pursuant to Section 6 of the Service Agreement for Wholesale Distribution Service, change the address to which billings will be sent.

15. Disputes:

With the exception of any billing dispute as provided pursuant to Section 13.4 herein, or as otherwise limited by law, the Dispute Resolution Procedures set forth in the WDAT shall apply to all disputes between Victorville and SCE which arise under this Amended Agreement; provided, however, that the Dispute Resolution Procedures set forth in the WDAT shall not apply as to disputes regarding whether rates and charges set forth in this Agreement are just and reasonable under the Federal Power Act.

16. Audits:

16.1. SCE will maintain records and accounts of all costs incurred in sufficient detail to allow verification of all costs incurred, including, but not limited to, labor and associated labor burden, material and supplies, outside services, and administrative and general expenses.

16.2. Victorville shall have the right, upon reasonable notice, at a reasonable time at SCE's offices and at its own expense, to audit SCE’s records and accounts as necessary and as appropriate in order to verify costs incurred by SCE. Any audit requested by Victorville shall be limited to the costs reflected in the final invoice as set forth in Sections 13.1.8 or 13.2.1, and shall be completed, and written notice of any audit dispute provided to SCE pursuant to Section 6 of the Service Agreement, within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days following receipt by Victorville of such final invoice.

17. Operating Representatives:

The responsibilities assigned to the Operating Representatives appointed pursuant to Section 3 of Attachment B to the Tariff shall extend to the activities required under this Amended Agreement.

18. Regulatory Authority:

18.1. No later than thirty (30) calendar days following the execution of this Agreement, SCE shall tender this Agreement for filing with FERC with a request that it be made effective upon acceptance without suspension, and Victorville shall support SCE in obtaining all necessary authorizations and approvals for this Amended Agreement.

18.2. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as affecting in any way: (i) the right of SCE to unilaterally make application to the FERC for a change in rates, charges, classification, or service, or any rule, regulation, or contract relating thereto, under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act and pursuant to the Rules and Regulations promulgated by FERC there under; (ii) the right of Victorville to oppose such changes under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act; (iii) the right of Victorville to file a complaint requesting a change in rates, charges, classification, or service, or any rule, regulation or contract relating thereto, or rate methodology or design relating to services provided hereunder, under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act and pursuant to the rules and regulations promulgated by the FERC there under; or (iv) the right of SCE to oppose such complaint by Victorville under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act. Any change shall become effective pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act.

18.3. Victorville shall reimburse SCE for all fees and charges related to the FERC fees and annual charges provided in Sections 381 and 382 of the FERC’s regulations (18 C.F.R. § 381 and 382), as such regulation may from time to time be amended, that are imposed on SCE attributable to the service provided under this Amended Agreement or Service Agreement, or any amendments thereto. SCE will render bills to Victorville for any such fees and charges incurred since the preceding billing. As of the Effective Date, no such fees and charges have been imposed on SCE attributable to the service provided under this Amended Agreement and the Service Agreement.

19. No Dedication Of Facilities:

Any undertaking by one Party to the other Party under this Amended Agreement shall not constitute the dedication of the electrical system or any portion thereof of the undertaking Party to the public or to the other Party, and it is understood and agreed that any such undertaking by a Party shall cease upon the termination of its obligations hereunder.

20. No Third Party Rights:

Unless otherwise specifically provided in this Amended Agreement, the Parties do not intend to create rights in or grant remedies to any third party as a beneficiary of this Agreement or of any duty, covenant, obligation, or undertaking established hereunder.

21. Relationship Of Parties:

The covenants, obligations, and liabilities of the Parties are intended to be several and not joint or collective, and nothing contained in this Amended Agreement shall ever be construed to create an association, joint venture, trust, or partnership, or to impose a trust or partnership covenant, obligation, or liability on or with regard to either Party. Each Party shall be individually responsible for its own covenants, obligations, and liabilities as provided in this Agreement. Neither Party shall be under the control of or shall be deemed to control the other Party. Neither Party shall be the agent of or have a right or power to bind the other Party without such other Party's express written consent.

22. Waivers:

Any waiver at any time by either Party of its rights with respect to a default under this Agreement, or with respect to any other matter arising in connection with this Amended Agreement, shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to any other or subsequent default or other matter arising in connection therewith. Any delay, short of any statutory period of limitation, in asserting or enforcing any right, shall not be deemed a waiver of such right.

23. Governing Law:

Except as otherwise provided by federal law, this Amended Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, the laws of the state of California.

24. Notices:

Any notice, demand, or request provided in this Amended Agreement, or served, given, or made in connection with it, shall be made in accordance with Section 6 of the Service Agreement.

25. Severability:

In the event that any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Amended Agreement or the application of any such term, covenant, or condition shall be held invalid as to any person, entity, or circumstance by any court, arbitration, or regulatory authority having jurisdiction, the invalidity of such term, covenant or condition shall not affect the validity of any other term, provision, condition or covenant and such term, provision, covenant or condition shall remain in force and effect as applied to this Amended Agreement to the maximum extent permitted by law. The Parties hereto further agree to negotiate in good faith to establish new and valid terms, conditions and covenants to replace any found invalid so as to place each Party as nearly as possible in the position contemplated by this

Amended Agreement.

26. Entire Agreement:

This Amended Agreement and the Service Agreement constitute the complete and final expression of the agreement between the Parties and are intended as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of their agreement which supersedes all prior and contemporaneous offers, promises, representations, negotiations, discussions, communications, and other agreements which may have been made in connection with the subject matter of this Amended Agreement and the Service Agreement.

27. Ambiguities:

Ambiguities or uncertainties in the wording of this Amended Agreement shall not be construed for or against any Party, but will be construed in the manner that most accurately reflects the Parties’ intent as of the date they executed this Amended Agreement.

28. Signature Clause:

The signatories hereto represent that they are authorized to enter into this Amended Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom they sign. This Amended Agreement is hereby executed as of the xx day of July, 2023.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

By: _______________________
Name: Andrea Tozer
Title: Director, Grid Contracts Origination & Operations

VICTORVILLE MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICES

By: ___ /S/_Keith C. Metzler___________
Name:

Title: City Manager

By: _________/S/_Andre de Bortnowsky _____
Approved as to Form
Title: City Attorney

By: __________/S/ Sandra Bostick___________
Name:

Title: City Risk Manager

Exhibit A

Interconnection Facilities Description and Costs

1. Interconnection Facilities Cost

a. For Service to 1.25 Megawatts (Letter Agreement No. 1)

Estimated Cost

Element – Interconnection Facilities

Interconnection
Facilities Cost

ITCC

One-Time
Cost

Total Cost
• Five 50 foot wood poles – 4735567E,
4735568E, 4735569E, 4735570E,
4735571E
• 1320 feet of 336.4 MCM ACSR
overhead conductor
• One 60A 33kV OH load break remote
control switch on pole # 4735569E
• One set of metering potential
transformers and current transformers
• One metering cabinet and
KWH/KVARH, IDR, Netcon Rug
Electronic Meter
• Removal of 3 poles and 1 switch
$250,000.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $305,000.00
Total $250,000.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $305,000.00

Actual Cost

Element

Interconnection
Facilities Cost

Distribution
Upgrades

ITCC

One-Time
Cost

Total Cost
Interconnection Facilities
• Two 50 foot wood poles –
4735567E and 4735568E
• 1320 feet of 336.4 MCM
ACSR overhead conductor
• One 60A 33kV OH load
break remote control
switch on pole # 4735569E
• One set of metering
potential transformers and
current transformers
• One metering cabinet and

KWH/KVARH, IDR,
Netcon Rug Electronic
Meter
$109,711.79 $0.00 $24,136.59 $4,967.78 $138,816.16

• Removal of 3 poles and 1
switch
Distribution Upgrades (not subject
to monthly charges)
• Install three (3) 50 foot
wood poles, 4735569E,
4735570E, 4735571E
• Remove three (3) 50 foot
wood poles
$0.00 $32,383.35 $7,124.34 $11,996.83 $51,504.52
Total $109,711.79 $32.383.35 $31,260.93 $16,964.61 $190,320.68

b. For Service to 9.25 Megawatts (Letter Agreement No. 2)

Estimated Cost

Element – Interconnection Facilities

Interconnection
Facilities Cost

ITCC

One-Time
Cost

Total Cost

$450,000.00

$450,000.00
Total $450,000.00

$450,000.00

Actual Cost

Element
Interconnection
Facilities Cost
Distribution
Upgrades
ITCC One-Time
Cost
Total Cost
Interconnection Facilities
• Install three (3) 65
foot wood poles
• Install fifteen (15)
lightning arresters
• Install fifteen (15)
mounting fuses
• Install three (3)
transformers
• Install three (3)
capacitors and
regulators
$511,471.57 $0.00 $122,753.18 $26,507.24 $660,731.99
Distribution Upgrades (not
subject to monthly charges)
• Install three (3) 65
foot wood poles
• Remove three (3) 65
foot wood poles
$0.00 $73,100.68 $17,544.16 $0.00 $90,644.84
Total $511,471.57 $73,100.68 $140,297.34 $26,507.24 $751,376.83

c. For Service to 18.0 Megawatts (Letter Agreement No. 3)

Estimated Cost

Element – Interconnection Facilities

Interconnection
Facilities Cost

ITCC

One-Time
Cost

Total Cost
• One new 33 kV OH RCS to the Cement
33 kV circuit
• Approximately 1,000 feet of line
extension of the Portland 33 kV circuit
• Installation of double-circuit OH
construction on the existing Cement pole-
line
$303,000.00 $24,240.00

$327,240.00
Total $303,000.00 $24,240.00

$327,240.00

Actual Cost

Element
Interconnection
Facilities Cost
Distribution
Upgrades
ITCC One-Time Cost Total Cost
Interconnection Facilities
None
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Distribution Upgrades (not
subject to monthly charges)
• One new 33 kV OH
RCS to the Cement 33
kV circuit
• Approximately 1,000
feet of line extension
of the Portland 33 kV
circuit
• Installation of double-
circuit OH
construction on the
existing Cement pole-
line
$0.00 $184,639.80 $14,771.18 $20,024.25 $219,435.23
Total $0.00 $184,639.80 $14,771.18 $20,024.25 $219,435.23

d. For Service to 18.84 Megawatts (IFA Amendment)

Estimated Cost

Element – Interconnection Facilities

Interconnection
Facilities Cost

ITCC

One-Time
Cost

Total Cost
• Perform relay coordination study $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00

Total $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00

Actual Cost

Element – Interconnection Facilities

Interconnection
Facilities Cost

ITCC

One-Time
Cost

Total Cost
• Perform relay coordination study $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Total $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00

Exhibit B

Monthly Charges

1. Interconnection Facilities Charge

a. Interconnection Facilities Charge for Service to 1.25 Megawatts

i. Actual Interconnection Facilities Charge:

Effective Date Customer-Financed
Monthly Rate for Non-
ISO Controlled Facilities
Interconnection
Facilities Cost
Interconnection Facilities
Charge Based on Actual Cost
Interconnection
Facilities In-Service
Date: 8/17/09-present
See Section 4.1 of
Attachment J to the
WDAT*
$109,711.79 Customer-Financed Monthly Rate
for Non-ISO-Controlled Facilities
x Interconnection Facilities Cost
*Attachment J to the Tariff is available at the following link: https://www.sce.com/openaccess

b. Interconnection Facilities Charge for Service Greater than 1.25 Megawatts to 9.25 Megawatts

i. Estimated Interconnection Facilities Charge:

Effective Date Customer-Financed
Monthly Rate for Non-
ISO Controlled Facilities
Interconnection
Facilities Cost
Interconnection Facilities
Charge Based on Actual Cost
Interconnection
Facilities In-Service
Date: 1/31/10-present
See Section 4.1 of
Attachment J to the
WDAT*
$450,000.00 Customer-Financed Monthly Rate
for Non-ISO-Controlled Facilities
x Interconnection Facilities Cost
*Attachment J to the Tariff is available at the following link: https://www.sce.com/openaccess

ii. Actual Interconnection Facilities Charge:

Effective Date Customer-Financed
Monthly Rate for Non-
ISO Controlled Facilities
Interconnection
Facilities Cost
Interconnection Facilities
Charge Based on Actual Cost
Interconnection
Facilities In-Service
Date: 5/12/11-present
See Section 4.1 of
Attachment J to the
WDAT*
$511,471.57 Customer-Financed Monthly Rate
for Non-ISO-Controlled Facilities
x Interconnection Facilities Cost
*Attachment J to the Tariff is available at the following link: https://www.sce.com/openaccess

c. Interconnection Facilities Charge for Service Greater than 9.25 Megawatts to 18.0 Megawatts

i. Estimated Interconnection Facilities Charge:

Effective Date Customer-Financed
Monthly Rate for Non-
ISO Controlled Facilities
Interconnection
Facilities Cost
Interconnection Facilities
Charge Based on Actual Cost
Interconnection
Facilities In-Service
Date: 7/31/11-present
See Section 4.1 of
Attachment J to the
WDAT*
$303,000.00 Customer-Financed Monthly Rate
for Non-ISO-Controlled Facilities
x Interconnection Facilities Cost
*Attachment J to the Tariff is available at the following link: https://www.sce.com/openaccess

ii. Actual Interconnection Facilities Charge:

Effective Date Customer-Financed
Monthly Rate for Non-
ISO Controlled Facilities
Interconnection
Facilities Cost
Interconnection Facilities
Charge Based on Actual Cost
Interconnection
Facilities In-Service
Date: 9/25/12-present
See Section 4.1 of
Attachment J to the
WDAT*
$0.00 Customer-Financed Monthly Rate
for Non-ISO-Controlled Facilities
x Interconnection Facilities Cost
*Attachment J to the Tariff is available at the following link: https://www.sce.com/openaccess

d. Interconnection Facilities Charge for Service Greater than 18.0 Megawatts to 18.84 Megawatts

i. Estimated Interconnection Facilities Charge:

Effective Date Customer-Financed
Monthly Rate for Non-
ISO Controlled Facilities
Interconnection
Facilities Cost
Interconnection Facilities
Charge Based on Actual Cost
Interconnection
Facilities In-Service
Date: 3/1/23-present
See Section 4.1 of
Attachment J to the
WDAT*
$0.00 Customer-Financed Monthly Rate
for Non-ISO-Controlled Facilities
x Interconnection Facilities Cost
*Attachment J to the Tariff is available at the following link: https://www.sce.com/openaccess

Exhibit C

Payment Summary

Due Date

Payment
Upon invoice
delivery
$197,072.06

Exhibit D

One-Line Diagram

Attachment B
Interconnection Facilities Costs

Letter Agreement 1

Letter Agreement 2

Letter Agreement 3

Attachment C
Refund from SCE for Letter Agreement 1

Item Number: 10
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communication(s)
Meeting of: October 17, 2023
Submitted By:

William Racowschi, Fire Chief

Subject:

Purchase of Three (3) Zoll Cardiac Monitors
Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase of three (3) Zoll cardiac monitors from the Zoll Corporation in the amount of $182,189.64.

Fiscal Impact:

Funds for the purchase of these cardiac monitors were approved with the FY 23/24 budget during the meeting of June 06, 2023. This purchase will be funded from Measure P account no.1052010-55040-09107, no additional appropriations are needed.

Strategic Plan Goal:

Strategic Plan Goal B – Public Safety – Enhance the capabilities of the Victorville Fire Department to provide superior emergency medical services (EMS) and ensure the safety and wellbeing of the community. The purchase of these Zoll cardiac monitors play a pivotal role in enhancing EMS by facilitating precise diagnostics and ensuring timely intervention for the benefit of our community.

Background:

The Victorville Fire Department maintains an ongoing commitment to providing Advanced Life Support (ALS) services to the residents of the City of Victorville and its surrounding areas. In the last year, the Fire Department responded to more than 21,000 calls for emergency medical services. The safety and well-being of the community has always been at the forefront of the City of Victorville’s priorities.

Currently the Victorville Fire Department has a total of eight (8) Zoll cardiac monitors in service. Our department operates with a fleet of eight (8) emergency apparatus that are each equipped with a Zoll cardiac monitor. In addition to the eight (8) cardiac monitors, there are four (4) reserve monitors currently on a replacement plan. 3 3
3 3
These cardiac monitors have played a crucial role in EMS facilitating accurate diagnostics and providing timely intervention to our citizens.

Discussion:

On September 19, 2023, the Victorville Fire Department was approved to purchase three (3) new apparatus for our fleet; two new squads and one replacement squad. Each of these squads is mandated by the Local EMS Authority (LEMSA) to be equipped with an ECG monitor/defibrillator. The rationale behind this purchase corresponds directly to the newly approved apparatus for purchase.

The Zoll cardiac monitors are designed to seamlessly provide EMS staff with feedback while they perform high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These monitors are equipped with “real CPR help” technology which nearly triples the survival rate for cardiac arrest. These monitors also provide “real bag valve mask (BVM) help” technology, offering critical support in patient stabilization, thus allowing staff the necessary time to provide effective patient care.

Furthermore, it is important to note that the newly purchased Zoll cardiac monitors will seamlessly integrate into our replacement plan, alongside the existing monitors. This proactive approach ensures that our equipment remains up-to-date, in line with our industry advancements and consistently provides the highest level of care to our community.

Staff remains available to answer any questions the Council may have.

Attachments: A. Sole Source Form
B. Quote

ATTACHMENT A

SOLE SOURCE/BRAND REQUEST
When a request is made for a non-competitive purchase and the specifications limit the bidding to one source and/or one brand or trade name, the requesting department must complete the following:

VENDOR/COMPANY NAME: _______________________________________________________________

1. Please check one:

SOURCE: Item is available from one source only. Item is one-of-a kind and is not sold through distributors. The manufacturer is exclusive distributor.

SOLE BRAND: Various sources can supply the specified model and brand, and competitive bids will be solicited for the requested brand only. Meets form, fit and function - nothing else will do.

STANDARDIZATION REQUEST: The City of Victorville ______________________ (Department name) Department requires the item(s) to standardize parts; design; quality; training; etc...

2. What are the unique performance features of the product / brand requested that are not available in any other product / brand? (For services: What unique qualifications’, rights, licenses does this vendor possess?)

3. Why are the unique performance features REQUIRED (not merely preferred), and how would your requirement be inhibited without this service or item? N/A

4. If justification is based on matching and/or interdependent with existing equipment (refer to 1. Standardization Request), list the quantity, manufacturer, brand, and model of the existing equipment and why the matching is required.

I am aware of the City of Victorville’s policy for competitive bidding and the established criteria for sole source/sole brand purchasing. Therefore, I feel confident that this request for sole source/sole brand procurement meets the City of Victorville’s criteria and will withstand an audit or a vendor protest.

Requestor: ________________________________ ______________________________ ___________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
Dept. Director: ____________________________ ______________________________ ___________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
Finance Director: __________________________ ______________________________ ____________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
Zoll Medical Corporation
Fire Department
Steve Casarez
10/05/2022
✔
✔
Zoll cardiac monitors provide "feedback CPR" and "real BVM" technology that other cardiac monitors do not provide when caring for patients in the prehospital setting.

The two features provide better resuscitation feedback and real-time clinical assessments when caring for a patient in cardiac arrest. Without these features patient outcomes may worsen.

Currently the Victorville Fire Department uses Zoll cardiac monitors for the emergency medical service program. This department currently has eleven (11) Zoll cardiac monitors.

ATTACHMENT B

ReItem Number: 11
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: October 17, 2023
Submitted By:

Keith C. Metzler, City Manager

Subject:

Side Letter of Agreement #2 between the City of Victorville and the Victorville Professional Firefighters
Recommendation:

That the Honorable City Council adopt Resolution No. 23-082 Approving Side Letter of Agreement #2 between the City of Victorville and the Victorville Professional Firefighters and authorize the City Manager to execute said Side Letter of Agreement.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This item aligns with Goal B - Public Safety. The approval of Side Letter of Agreement #2 will ensure that the Firefighter/EMT position will be represented by the Victorville Professional Firefighters and shall be in the bargaining unit subject to the Memorandum of Understanding.

Background:

On January 16, 2018, the Victorville City Council took action to re-establish a City operated Fire Department and directed staff to begin formation. On March 30, 2019, the City officially transitioned its fire service from the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District to its own City Fire Department. On November 5, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2296, which established the parameters for Employer-Employee Relations and established related policies and procedures. Ordinance No. 2296 was subsequently codified as Victorville Municipal Code, Chapter 2.40.

On April 14, 2020, the Victorville Professional Firefighters (“VPF”) submitted a petition for recognition in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code Section 2.40.050. On April 17, 2020, and in accordance with VMC 2.40.060 and 2.40.070, the City gave written notice 3 3
0 4
of its receipt of the request for recognition, thereby starting the 30-day challenge period required in code. Subsequently, on May 18, 2020, the City formally recognized the VPF as the exclusive employee organization for Fire Captains, Fire Engineers, and Firefighter/Paramedics of the department.

Once the union was formally recognized, the City commenced negotiations with the VPF with the intent to enter into its first Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The City’s negotiating team met and conferred with the VPF representatives on numerous occasions beginning in September 2020, throughout 2021 and into 2022 to discuss terms and conditions of employment and the structure of the MOU. At the May 17, 2022, Regular City Council meeting, the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Victorville and the Victorville Professional Firefighters was approved effective May 17, 2022, through May 16, 2027.

At the October 4, 2022, Regular City Council meeting, the City Council approved a Side Letter of Agreement which modified the Memorandum of Understanding and added two new articles to the MOU which included Article 15.12 Arson Investigator Pay and 15.13 Arson Shift Investigator Team Member.

Discussion:

A Side Letter of Agreement in its most basic form, is a commonly used written agreement that modifies the Memorandum of Understanding. The Side Letter of Agreement #2 presented for approval by the City Council shall modify the existing Memorandum of Understanding by amending two existing articles contained within the Memorandum of Understanding. The requested amendments are reflected below. •Article 4.1 shall be amended to include the following sentences and pay scale at the conclusion of the articles:

On June 6, 2023, the Victorville City Council adopted its Table of Organization to create and include a Firefighter EMT (FFEMT) position. This position was created to underfill the Firefighter Paramedic (FFPM) rank in times where recruiting challenges are preventing the City from filling all of its budgeted FFPM positions. The FFEMT classification shall be represented by the Victorville Professional Firefighters and shall be in the bargaining unit subject to this Memorandum of Understanding.

The following pay scale is the adopted pay scale for the FFEMT classification, effective as of July 1, 2023, and shall be subject to the subsequent 3% annual increases described above that are being provided to the other classifications subject to the Memorandum of Understanding.

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
D. Firefighter EMT (FFEMT) 5,778 6,067 6,370 6,689 7,023 •The first sentence of Article 11 shall be amended to read as follows:
3 3
0 4
Each Fire Captain, Fire Engineer, Firefighter/Paramedic, and Firefighter/EMT shall receive $75.00 per month as a uniform allowance.

The modifications set forth in the Side Letter of Agreement #2 shall become effective immediately upon approval by the City Council.

Staff recommends approval of the Side Letter of Agreement #2 and remains available for any comments or questions.

Attachments: A. Resolution No. 23-082

ATTACHMENT A
Resolution No. 23-082
RESOLUTION NO. 23-082

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE APPROVING A SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT # 2 BETWEEN THE CITY OF

VICTORVILLE AND THE VICTORVILLE PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS WHEREAS, on January 16, 2018, the Victorville City Council voted to approve resumption of a city run fire department and directed staff to begin formation; and WHEREAS, on March 30, 2019, the City officially transitioned its fire service from the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District to its own Fire Department; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2020, the Victorville Professional Firefighters (“VPF”) submitted a petition for recognition in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code Section

2.40.050; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2020, the City formally recognized the VPF and the City commenced negotiations with VPF with the hopes of entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”); and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 3500, et seq., (the Meyers - Milias-Brown Act) requires that public employers meet and confer regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment; and WHEREAS, the City negotiating team met and conferred with the VPF representatives on numerous occasions to discuss terms and conditions of employment and the structure of a MOU; and
WHEREAS, the City and the VPF agreed to the terms which are included in the MOU attached hereto as “Exhibit B”; and
WHEREAS, the Victorville City Council approved the MOU at its May 17, 2022 , regular city council meeting, which MOU is effective May 17, 2022, through May 16, 2027; and
WHEREAS, the Victorville City Council approved the Side Letter of Agreement at its October 2, 2022, regular city council meeting, which modified the MOU and added two new articles in order to expand the City’s arson investigator program.

WHEREAS, in order to add the Firefighter/EMT classification to the exclusive employee organization, Victorville Professional Firefighters, the City and the VPF have agreed to additional terms which are included in the Side Letter of Agreement # 2 between the City of Victorville and the Victorville Professional Firefighters attached hereto as “Exhibit A.”

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Exhibit A is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Victorville.

SECTION 2. The City Clerk of the City of Victorville shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and its approval by the City Council and shall cause the same to be listed in the records of the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS 17th DAY OF OCTOBER 2023.

Exhibit A to Resolution No. 23-082
Side Letter of Agreement # 2 Between The City of
Victorville and the Victorville Professional
Firefighters
SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT #2
SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT # 2 BETWEEN

THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE AND THE VICTORVILLE PROFESSIONAL

FIREFIGHTERS
This Side Letter of Agreement #2 is entered into between the City of Victorville (City) and the Victorville Professional Firefighters (VPF) (City and VPF are collectively, the “parties”) and shall modify the parties’ Memorandum of Understanding dated May 17, 2022, through May 16, 2027, as set forth below.

The following modifications shall be made:

1. Article 4.1 shall be amended to include the following sentences and pay scale at the conclusion of the article:

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
D. Firefighter EMT (FFEMT) 5,778 6,067 6,370 6,689 7,023

2. The first sentence of Article 11 shall be amended to read as follows:

Each Fire Captain, Fire Engineer, Firefighter/Paramedic, and Firefighter/EMT shall receive $75.00 per month as a uniform allowance.

No other modifications or changes, other than those outlined above, are made to the existing Memorandum of Understanding between the parties.

This Side Letter of Agreement is effective upon approval by the City Council.

City of Victorville Victorville Professional Firefighters _______________________________ ______________________________ City Manager Association President
______________________________
Human Resources Officer

Exhibit B to Resolution No. 23-082
Memorandum of Understanding

Victorville City CouncilOctober 17, 2023

Victorville City Council
October 17, 2023