Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO. 23-100
RESOL
UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, REVISED CITY COUNCIL POLICY CP -23-02 AND AN UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE MASTER
FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN SERVICE AND DEVELOPMENT -RELATED FEES
FOR CITY SERVICES
WHEREA
S, Victorville Municipal Code (VMC) Section 16-5.01.080 authorizes and outlines the imposition of development impact fees applicable to all development in the City of Victorville (“ City”) in accordance with applicable laws including, but not limited to, Government Code section 66000, et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), and allows for development impact fee amounts to be set by City Council resolution; and
WHEREAS,
development impact fee amounts were most recently established or updated by Resolution No. 22-050; and
WHEREAS,
City Council Policy No. CP-23-02; was previously adopted to establish the guidelines for implementation of development impact fees and capacity fees; and WHEREA
S, the City must periodically review development impact fees to ensure they are sufficient to mitigate the impacts of new development on the associated capital facilities and other improvements needed to maintain the existing level of public service; and
WHEREAS,
on June 7, 2022, by means of Resolution No. 22-045, the City Council adopted two reports from N.B.S. Government Finance Group entitled “City of Victorville Development Impact Fee Study” and “Sewer Capacity Fee Study” and a report from DTA entitled “Development Impact Fee Justification Study Regional Drainage Facilities” (collectively, the Nexus Studies ) which analyzed and establish ed the relationship, or nexus, between the imposition of an updated development impact fee program (Development Impact Fees or Fees) and the estimated, reasonable costs of constructing the City capital facilities for which the Fees are charged; and WHEREA
S, pursuant to Government Code Section 66013 (a part of the Mitigation Fee Act) the City is authorized to establish and impose facility capacity charges for public facilities in existence at the time a charge is imposed or for new public facilities to be acquired or constructed in the future that are of proportional benefit to the person or property being charged, including supply or facility capacity contracts for rights or entitlements, real property interests, and entitlements and other rights of the local agency involving capital expense relating to its use of existing or new public facilities (Sewer Capacity Charges); and WHEREA
S, on June 7, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Assembly Bill 602, and also by means of Resolution No. 22 -045, the City Council adopted a Capital Improvement Plan that establishes public facilities pursuant to Government Code section 66000(d) which the Development Impact Fees and Sewer Capacity Charges will fund; and WHEREAS, the Nexus Studies established updated maximum fees/charges by development type for Parks and Recreation, Fire Protection, Police, Public Buildings, Road Improvements, Sewer Capacity, and Regional Drainage, and established new fees for Libraries and Administration of the development impact fees program; and WHEREAS, there is no requirement to implement fees/charges at the maximum rate determined through the Nexus Studies and it is within the discretion of the City Council to establish fees/charges at amounts less than the specified maximum to further the strategic goals of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to encourage development by phasing in and reducing certain impact fees and creating other options that will foster development in certain areas of the City and support certain project types to help to ensure that the City continues a steady rate of growth needed for the economic viability of retail, commercial, residential, and industrial development, all of which increase employment opportunities for many individuals, including, but not limited to, those that live within the City and/or do business within the City; and
WHE
REAS, by means of Resolution No. 22-0 45, the City Council adopted a four-year phased implementation schedule for residential development, including single family, multi-family and mobile homes, to help ensure Development Impact Fee and Capacity Charge increases did not suddenly constrain residential development, and such DIF and Capacity Charges remain valid and will be in year-two of the phased implementation plan, effective January 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, City Council Policy No. CP-2 2-01, requires an annual review of the Development Impact Fee and Capacity Charges council policy, Capital Improvement Plan and application of the California Construction Cost Index (CCI) to applicable fees; and WHEREAS, the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges (attached hereto as Exhibit A), in combination with the residential Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges from Resolution No. 22-045, City Council Policy No.
CP-23-02 (attached hereto as Exhibit B), and the Capital Improvement Plan (Exhibit C), outline the fees and char ges, the implementation guidelines r ecommended to achieve this development encouragement strategy and projects to be funded by the fees; and
WHEREAS, the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges, City Council Policy No. CP-23-0 2 and Capital Im provement Plan have been made available for public review with copies on file in the City Clerk ’s office and posted on the City’s website; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirement of the Mitigation Fee Act, notice of a public hearing to be held on December 19, 2023, was published in the V alley Wide Newspaper on December 8, 2023, with a second notic e thereof published on December 15, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held and conducted a public hearing on December 19, 2023, in accordance with the duly published public hearing notice, to review and consider the adoption of the Master Fee Sc hedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges, City Council Policy No. CP-23-02 and Capital Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2023, by means of adopting Resolution No. 23-100, the City Council made findings stating that: (1) the purpose of the Development Impact Fees is to prevent new development from reducing the quality and availability of public services provided to residents of the City by requiring new development to contribute to the cost of additional public facilities needed to meet the additional demands placed on public services by new development; (2) the Development Impact Fees collected will be used for the acquisition, ins tallation, and c onstruction of the public facilities identified in the Nexus Studies and as sociated Capital Improvement P lan; (3) a reasonable relationship exists between the use of Development Impact Fees and the type of development project on which the fees are imposed as described in detail in the Nexus Studies and Capital Improvement Plan; and (4) a reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the Development Impact Fees and the cost of the public facilities attributable to the development on which the Fees are imposed as indicated by the Nexus Studies, and the method of allocation of the respective Fees to a particular development project bears a fair relationship, and is roughly proportional to, the development project’s burden on, and benefits from, public facilities to be funded by the Development Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, by adopting Resolution No. 23-100, the City Council made findings that:
(1) the amount of Sewer Capacity Charges did not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of the services and public improvem ents/facilities for which such Sewer Capacity Charges were being imposed; (2) the public impr ovements/facilities are of proportional benefit to person or property being charged; and
WHEREAS, adoption of the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges , City Council Policy CP-23-02 and Capital Improvement Plan will establish the Development Impact Fees, including the Sewer Capacity Charges, that may be imposed by development type under the various Fee categories and fund certain capital projects as established in the Capital Improvement Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by reference together with any definitions and findings set forth therein.
SECTION 2. The City Council has reviewed and hereby approves and adopts the Mas ter Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges attached hereto as Exhibit A, City Council Polic y CP-23-02 attached hereto as Exhibit B and Capital Improvement Plan, attached herein as Exhibit C. Adoption of the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges will approve updated fees and charges to be implemented in accordance with guidelines found in City Council P olicy No. CP-23-02,
including without limitation the Annual Cost Adjustm ent to such fees and charges as set forth in Section III of said policy.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby reaffirms the Mitigation Fee Act findings previously made as set forth in Sections 3 and 4 of Resolution No. 22-045 and the recitals hereof with respect to the fees and charges being adopted in the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges attached hereto as Exhibit A as it relates to non- residential fees and year two of the originally adopted phased implementation of residential Development Impact Fees and Sewer Capacity Charges.
SECTION 4. Effective as of January 1, 2024, City Council Policy No. CP-22-01 is hereby superseded and replaced with CP-23-02.
SECTION 5. The City Council finds that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the adoption of this Resolution, pursuant to Sections 15061 and 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines because: (1) to the extent that any of the fees or charges set forth in the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges adopted by this Resolution are actually imposed and collected, such fees or charges will be for the purposes of obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to m aintain the current levels of service within existing service areas to serve new development; and (2) to the extent that any of the fees or charges set forth in the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges adopted by this Resolution are actually imposed and collected and used to fund new facilities, the construction of those facilities will not take place until there has been CEQA review of the development projects which will pay the fees, and the construction of each public facility will be subject to CEQA review. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that the adoption of this Resolution establishing these fees will not have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. However, the updated fees and charges for non-
residential development shall go into effect as of
March 1, 2024, s ubject to the provisions of City Council Policy No. CP-23-02 attached hereto as Exhibit B.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions; and shall make a minute of passage and adoption ther eof in the records of the pr oceedings, in the minutes of the meeting at which this Resolution is passed and adopted.
Resolution No. VWD 23-015
RESOLUTION NO. VWD 23-015
A RESOL
UTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE VICTORVILLE WATER
DISTRICT ADOPTING THE WATER DISTRICT RELATED PORTIONS OF THE
UPDATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, REVISED CITY COUNCIL POLICY CP - 23-02 AND AN UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE FOR
CERTAIN WATER DISTRICT SERVICE AND DEVELOPMENT RELATED FEES WHEREA
S, the Victorville Water District (the “ District”), is a county water district and subsidiary district of the City of Victorville (the “City” or “Victorville”); and WHEREA
S, the District constructs, owns, operates, improves, and maintains the water system and related facilities and infrastructure that serves the District's existing customers and provides water service availability to new customers and new developments within the jurisdictional boundaries of the District; and WHEREA
S, pursuant to Government Code Section 66013 (a part of the Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code § 66000 et seq .) the District is authorized to establish and impose facility capacity charges for public facilities in existence at the time a charge is imposed or for new public facilities to be acquired or constructed in the future that are of proportional benefit to the person or property being charged, including supply or facility capacity contracts for rights or entitlements, real property interests, and entitlements and other rights of the local agency involving capital expense relating to its use of existing or new public facilities (“Water System Capacity Charges”); and WHEREA
S, the governing bodies of local agencies, including the District Board of Directors (“District Board”), may approve and adopt fee studies and charges, including those associated with Water System Capacity Charges, by resolution; and WHEREA
S, the District Board must periodically review Water System Capacity Charges to ensure they are sufficient to mitigate the impacts of new development on the associated capital facilities and other improvements needed to maintain the existing level of public service and to ensure they reflect the estimated reasonable costs of providing the improvements and facilities for which they are being charged; and WHEREAS, on
June 7, 2022, by means of Resolution No. VWD 22- 005, the District Board adopted the relevant portion of a report from N.B.S. Government Finance Group entitled “City of Victorville Development Impact Fee Study (the “ Nexus Study”), Chapter 8 of which provided the calculation basis and methodology for the proposed Water System Capacity Charges and reflected the estimated, reasonable costs of constructing the water improvements and facilities for which said fees are being charged; and
WHEREA
S, on June 7, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Assembly Bill 602 and by means of adopting Resolution No. VWD -22-005, the District Board adopted those portions of a Capital Improvement Plan that established public facilities pursuant to Government Code section 66000(d) which the Water System Capacity Charges would fund; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 8 of the Nexus Study established the updated maximum Water System Capacity Charges for the District’s water system improvements associated with new development, which said maximum included a new percentage component for administration of the City’s development impact fees program; and WHEREAS, the District has compared the maximum Water System Capacity Charges established through the adoption of the Nexus Study with other agencies and collected feedback from various stakeholders as to the potential impact of increased fees on development projects, especially those already considered to be significantly underway; and
WHEREAS, there is no requirement to implement fees/charges at the maximum rate determined through the Nexus Study and it is within the discretion of the District Board to establish fees/charges at an amount less than the maximum to further the strategic goals of the City; and
WHEREAS, together with the City Council, the District Board of Directors desires to encourage development by phasing in and reducing certain impact fees and creating other options that will foster development in certain areas of the City and for certain project types to help to ensure that the City continues a steady rate of growth needed for the economic viability of retail, commercial, residential, and industrial development, all of which increase employment opportunities for many individuals, including, but not limited to, those that live within the City
and/or do business within the City; and
WHEREAS, by means of Resolution No. V WD 22-0 05, the District Board of Directors adopted a four -year phased implem entation schedule for residential development, including single family, multi-family and mobile homes, to help ensur e Water System Capacity Charge increases did not suddenly constrain r esidential development, and such Capacity Charges remain valid and will be in year-two of the phased implementation plan, effective January 1, 2024; and WHEREAS, City Council Policy No. CP-2 2-01, requires an annual review of the Development Impact Fee and Capacity Charges council policy, Capital Im provement Plan and application of the California Construction Cost Index (CCI) to applicable fees; and
WHEREAS, the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges (attached hereto as Exhibit A), in combination with the residential Water System Capacity Charges from Resolution No. VWD 22-005, City Council Policy No. CP-2 3-02 (attached hereto as Exhibit B), and the Capital Improvement Plan (Exhibit C), outline the fees and charges , the implementation guidelines recommended to achieve this development encouragement strategy and projects to be funded by the fees; and WHEREAS, the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges, City Council Policy No. CP-23-02 and Capital Improvement Plan have been made available for public review with copies on file in the City Clerk/Board Secretary’s office and posted on the City/Board’s website; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirement of the Mitigation Fee Act, notice of a public hearing to be held on December 19, 2023, was published in the Valley Wide Newspaper on December 8, 2023, with a second notic e thereof published on December 15, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and District Board of Directors held and conducted a public hearing on December 19, 2023, in accordance with the duly published public hearing notice, to review and consider the adoption of the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impac t Fees and Capacity Charges, City Council Policy No. CP-2 3-02 and Capital Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, by adopting Res olution No. VWD 23-015, the District Board made findings that: (1) the amount of Water System Capacity Charges did not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of the services and public improvements/facilities for which such Water System Capacity Charges were being imposed; (2) the allocation of those costs were fair or reasonable in relationship to the burdens on, or benefits that those who pay a Water System Capacity Charge will receive from such services and facilities; and (3) the public improvements/facilities are of proportional benefit to person or property being charged; and
WHEREAS, adoption of those portions of the Master Fee Schedule for Water System Capacity Charges and those portions of City Council Policy CP-23-02 and Capital Improvement Plan relating thereto will establish the Water System Capacity Charges that may be imposed by development type under the various Fee categories.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by reference, together with any definitions and findings set forth therein.
SECTION 2. The District Board has reviewed and hereby approves and adopts those portions of the Master Fee Sc
hedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity
Charges attached hereto as Exhibit A, portions of City Council Policy CP-23-02 attached hereto as Exhibit B, relating to water system impr ovements and the district r elated projects within the Capital Improvement Plan as listed in Exhibit C. Adoption of the Master Fee Schedule for Development Impact Fees and Capacity Charges will update Fees and Charges to be implemented in accordance with guidelines found in the City Council Policy No. CP-23-02, including without limitation the Annual Cost Adjustment to such fees and char ges as set forth in Section III of said policy.
SECTION 3. The District Board hereby reaffirms the Mitigation Fee Act findings previously made as set forth in Section 3 of Resolution No. VWD 22-0 05 and the recitals hereof with respect to the Water System Capacity Charges being adopted in the Master Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A as it relates to non-residential fees and year two of the originally adopted phased implementation of residential Water System Capacity Charges.
SECTION 4. All resolutions or administrative actions by the District Board, or parts thereof that are inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution, including without limitation, VWD Resolution No. 22-007, are hereby superseded, but only to the extent of such inconsistency.
SECTION 5. The District Board finds that the California Environm ental Quality Ac t (CEQA) does not apply to the adoption of this Resolution, pursuant to Sections 15061 and 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines because: (1) to the extent that any of the fees or charges set forth in the Master Fee Schedule for Water System Capacity Charges adopted by this Resolution are actually imposed and collected, such fees or charges will be for the purpos es of obtaining funds for capital projects neces sary to maintain the current levels of service within existing service areas to serve new development; and (2) to the extent that any of the fees or charges set forth in the Master Fee Schedule for Water System Capacity Charges adopted by this Resolution are actually imposed and collected and used to fund new facilities, the construction of those facilities will not take place until there has been CEQA review of the dev elopment projects which will pay the fees, and the construction of each public facility will be subject to CEQA review.
Therefore, it c an be seen with certainty that the adoption of this Resolution establishing these fees will not have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. However, the Water System Capac ity Charges for non-residential devleopment shall go into effec t as of March 1, 2024, subject to the applicable provisions of City Council Policy No.
CP-22-02 attached hereto as Exhibit B.
SECTION 7. The Distric t Secretary s hall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of the District; and shall make a minute of passage and adoption ther eof in the recor ds of the pr oceedings of the District, in the minutes of the meeting at whic h this Resolution is passed and adopted.
Exhibit A
DIF Master Fee Schedule
Non-Residential Development Unit Fire Protection Police Public Buildings Road Improvements Admin. Fee
(.2% of total)
Retail/Service Commercial KSF 508.35$ 109.28$ 449.04$ 8,993.02$ 20.12$ Professional Office KSF 696.04$ 87.42$ 359.24$ 8,365.60$ 19.02$ Lodging Room 258.08$ 48.68$
200.03$ 3,863.35$
8.74$
Industrial/Business Park KSF 54.74$
28.81$
118.38$ 4,182.80$
8.77$
High-Cube Warehouse KSF 7.82$
19.87$
81.65$ 1,016.67$
2.25$
Self-Service Storage KSF 23.47$
0.99$
4.08$ 1,728.34$
3.51$
Gasoline/Service Station [5] Pump 656.94$ 12.91$ 53.07$ 49,816.84$ 101.08$ Institutional KSF 70.39$ 23.84$ 97.97$ 6,608.35$ 13.60$ Public Facilities KSF 703.86$ 87.42$
343.54$ 9,556.70$
21.38$
Non-Residential Development Unit Sewer Admin. Fee
(.2% of total)
Non-Residential
Development
Water System
Capacity Charge
Admin. Fee
(.2% of total)
Retail/Service Commercial EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$ 3/4" Meter 5,946.47$ 11.89$ Professional Office EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$ 1" Meter 9,930.61$ 19.86$ Lodging EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$
1-1/2" Meter 19,801.73$ 39.60$
Industrial/Business Park EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$ 2" Meter 31,694.67$ 63.39$
High-Cube Warehouse EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$
3" Meter 59,464.67$ 118.93$
Self-Service Storage EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$
4" Meter 99,127.61$ 198.26$
Gasoline/Service Station [5] EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$ 6" Meter 198,195.75$ 396.39$ Institutional EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$ 8" Meter 317,125.09$ 634.25$ Public Facilities EDU 2,998.02$ 6.00$
Non-Residential Development Unit Regional Drainage Admin. Fee (.2% of total)
Retail/Service Commercial Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$ Professional Office Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$
Lodging Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$
Industrial/Business Park Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$
High-Cube Warehouse Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$
Self-Service Storage Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$
Gasoline/Service Station [5] Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$
Institutional Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$
Public Facilities Acre 23,251.14$ 46.50$
[5] Canopy only; Convenience store, carwash, etc. calculated separately at Retail/Service Commercial rates.
CITY OF VICTORVILLE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Adopted 12/19/2023
Non-Residential
Effective 3/1/2024
FY24
Exhibit B
City Council Policy,
CP-23-02
City of Victorville
Council Policy
SUB
JECT: Policy No. CP-23-02
(Rescinding Policy No. CP22-01)
Development Impact Fees and Capacity
Charges
Effective: March 1, 2024
I. Purpose
The pur
pose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the implementation of Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Parks and Recreation, Libraries, Fire Protection, Police, Public Buildings, Road Improvements, Regional Drainage, as well as Capacity Charges for Sewer and Water and the associated Administrative Fee as adopted by the City Council and Board of Directors for the Victorville Water District. This policy does not govern the collection of fees by the City on behalf of outside agencies, such as VVWRA or any of the local school districts.
II. Im
plementation Timeline
A. Gr
andfathering of Projects – Certain projects, subject to the terms and conditions outlined below, shall be exempt from new DIF and Capacity Charges. In these instances, projects shall only be subject to DIF and Capacity Charges in effect prior to January 1, 2023. The exemption shall expire for any projects that have not pulled building permits before January 1, 2025, at which point projects shall become subject to DIF and Capacity Charges in effect at that time.
a. Single Family Residential Tracts – Projects for residential tracts within Victorville would be exempt from new DIF and Capacity Charges if they are significantly underway as of June 30, 2022; meaning the project has a final map submission to the City for plan check review, recorded Final Maps (including a recorded Dash Map within an approved, unexpired Tentative Tract Map) or is in the Final Map Approval Process.
i. For this policy, the following definitions shall apply:
1. F
inal Map Approval Process - having an approved, unexpired tentative map with an active improvement plan check being processed by the City as of June 30, 2022.
2. Dash Map - a phased tract map with a dash between the tract number and phase number.
b. Multi-family Developments – Projects that are fully entitled or have submitted a Complete Entitlement Application to the Planning Department prior to January 1, 2023, are exempt from new DIF and Capacity Charges. i. F or this policy, the following definitions shall apply:
1. Complete Entitlement Application - the submission of all the required application filing requirements to entitle a project that is deemed complete by City staff within 30 days of the
submission.
c. No
n-Residential Developments – A ll n on-residential projects (e.g. commercial and industrial) that have received project entitlements from the Planning Commission and have submitted construction plans to the Building Department for plan check prior to January 1, 2023.
III. A
nnual Cost Adjustment
F
ollowing the initial effective date, DIF and Capacity Charges shall be adjusted In December of each year by utilizing the Engineering News Record Building Cost Index July over July comparison, with an effective date of March 1st. For Single Family Residential Tracts and Multi -Family Development projects subject to phased implementation. To the extent that any DIF or Capacity Charges are approved for phased implementation, the annual cost adjustment shall be applied starting on March1st of the first year after the final phase is implemented and shall be based on a single year adjustment (not a cumulative adjustment covering multiple years).
IV
. Fee Collection
T
he collection of DIF and Capacity Charges shall be required prior to, but not later than, the time of final inspection. If a developer is requesting full release of all utilities prior to final inspection, including gas and electric service, these fees may be required to be paid at that time.
V. D
etermination of Applicable Fee
E
xcept for grandfathering of projects outlined in Section II, or as otherwise required by law, the applicable DIF and Capacity Charges will be determined based on the date of submittal of an application for a permit to the Building Department. The application must be for the specific building or improvement for which the fee would be applied. For example, within a tract of homes, the permit application would have to be for a specific home on a specific lot. Separate grading permits or permits for other types of improvements would not have the effect of establishing the DIF and Capacity Charges. This rate will remain the effective rate while the plan check for that application remains active. If the plan check expires, the applicant will have to submit a new application and will be subject to any DIF and Capacity Charge updates that have occurred between the initial expired submittal and the new submittal.
VI. Exemptions
The following categories of projects shall be ex empt from the requirement for the payment of DIF and Capacity Charges.
A. Old Town – Projects located within the Old Town Spec ific Plan geographical area.
B. City-owned Property – Development of facilities on land owned by the City or any of its subsidiary agencies, provided it is developed for public use or benefits the health, safety and welfare of the community at large.
C. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) less than 750 sq. ft.
VII. Credits Toward Applicable Fees
A developer may be eligible to receive credits for certain public impr ovements constructed by the developer to offset DIF and Capacity Charges.
Criteria establishing the eligibility for fee c redits for a category of public improvements are specific to that fee category as described below.
A. Park Land and Park Improvements
1. Land dedicated to the City by a developer, for the use of a planned City park, may be eligible for a DIF credit if it is determined that the land will support the development of a park that will benefit the community in a manner consistent with the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan. An appraisal report prepared by a qualified apprais er shall be submitted to the City for review. The dollar amount of the credit will be based on an appraised value found to be acceptable to the City.
2. Park improvements constructed by a developer for the use of a planned City park, may be eligible for a DIF credit if it is determined that the park improvements will benefit the community in a m anner consistent with the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
B. Road Improvements
1. The maximum Ro ad DIF credit available is 67 percent of the Road DIF collected for the development, which is the “Loc al Road Improvements” portion of the cost estimate in the most recent D IF Study, or the cost of the eligible road improvements, whichever is less. The remaining 33 percent of the Road DIF paid is r eserved for the SBCTA Nexus Study Road Improvements portion of the most recent DIF Study. The percentages may be adjusted based on future DIF study updates.
2. The
project must be on the most recently adopted DIF Road Project list.
3. Onl
y the center portion of a road is eligible for credit, because only the center portion was included in the cost estimate for the Road project list .
The eligible center width is as follows by street classification:
a. Art
erial 26 feet
b. Major Arterial 38 feet
c. Super Arterial 60 feet
4. Ut
ility relocation costs are not eligible. Culvert crossings for drainage are eligible if they are required as part of the approved road improvements, but longitudinal storm drain facilities are not eligible.
5. Pr
ojects on the State Highways System are not eligible for Road DIF credits because arterial road projects on the Road Project list are only City roads and interchanges on I-15 will not be constructed by a developer.
6. Road p
ortions outside of the City Limits (an adjacent City or County unincorporated area) are not eligible for Road DIF credits.
C. Dr
ainage Improvements
1. The pr
oject must be on the most recently adopted DIF Regional Drainage Facilities Project list.
2. Onl
y regional facilities are eligible, which in general, are the larger facilities identified as Regional in a Master Plan of Drainage prepared by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Typically, these facilities convey at least 750 cubic feet per second for the peak 100-year storm frequency.
3. For
the Southern California Logistics Airport (SCLA), eligible facilities are also identified in the DIF Regional Drainage Facilities Project list and consistent with the facilities identified in the most recent the SCLA Specific Plan update.
D. Sew
er Collection System Improvements
1. The pr
oject must be identified in the latest update of the Sewer Master Plan or a separate sewer study approved by the Engineering Department.
2. The pr
oject must increase the capacity of the sewer system.
3. Projects can include replacing an existing sewer main with a main of increased diameter or constructing a new sewer main. Sewer mains must be larger than 8 inches in diameter.
E. W
ater System Improvements
1. T
he project must be identified in the latest update of the Water Master Plan or a separate water study approved by the Engineering Department.
2. T
he project must increase the capacity of the water system.
3. P
rojects can include replacing an existing water main with a main of increased diameter or constructing a new sewer main. Water mains must be larger than 8 inches in diameter.
F. D
emolished Buildings
C
redits for demolished buildings or removed plumbing fixtures may be assigned to new permits on the same property on a like for like basis at the discretion of the Building Official. To qualify for these credits, detailed demolition plans must be submitted with plans for the new development indicating which structures or plumbing fixtures are being removed as part of the project.
G. G
eneral Requirements for Credits
I
f a project is determined to be eligible for DIF and/or Capacity Charge credits, the following general requirements shall apply:
1. A
letter must be submitted to the City requesting the credit.
2. C
ity staff will determine the eligible credit amount.
3. I
f the cost of land dedicated or improvements constructed exceeds the amount of DIF and/or Capacity Charge required to be paid by the developer, the developer may be eligible for reimbursement. The reimbursement amount is subject to available City DIF and Capacity Charge funds and must be specified in an agreement.
4. T
he City’s standard Fee Credit Agreement must be used. The standard agreement has a term of five years, after which the agreement becomes void. City Council must approve the agreement.
5. DI
F/Capacity Charge credits cannot be transferred to a different development project. The agreement is project specific.
6. Assignment of Road DIF/Capacity Charge credits to another party requires another agreement for the transfer of the credits, and approval by the City Council. The DIF/Capacity Charge credits remain with the land.
7. T
he improvements shall be installed by a contractor appropriately licensed in the State of California for the type of improvements constructed.
8. S
tate prevailing wage rates shall be paid to the contractors that install the improvements.
9. I
mprovements shall be designed to City standards in accordance with approved plans by the City Engineer.
10. A
fter construction of the project, the following information is required:
a. Supporting documentation for the actual cost of the work. b. General contractor and sub-contractor names and license numbers. c. Signed contracts and lien releases for all contractors and subcontractors associated with the work.
d. Certified payroll substantiating that State prevailing wages were paid.
11. T
he maximum amount of DIF/Capacity Charge credit cannot exceed the actual cost of the eligible improvements unless the developer is eligible for reimbursement in accordance with an approved agreement.
12. T
he credit is subtracted from the DIF/Capacity Charge required to be paid by the developer . The Building Division administers the DIF /Capacity Charge credits after the agreement is approved.
Exhibit C
Capital Improvement Plan
Development Impact Fee &
Capacity Fee
Capital Improvement Plan
FY 2024
Facility Name Facility Cost Site Acres Estimated Site
Value Project Total
New
Development
Cost Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative
Funding Cost
Share
Impact Fee Cost
Basis
Timeframe to
Complete Justification Notes 1
Sports Complex $ 17,300,000.00 15 $ 850,000.00 $ 18,150,000.00 50% Measure P; General Fund;
Existing Fund
Balance;
State & Federal
Grants
50% Estimated
based on
current
construction
costs for
projects of a
similar nature
and current
commercial land
prices.
Mid-Term The City's 2020- Park &
Rec Master Plan on page
89 established a need of
5-8 additional
multipurpose rectangular
fields for the City's
existing population.
The City's 2020- Park & Rec
Master Plan established a need
for 5-8 additional multipurpose
rectangular fields for the City's
existing population & future
population into 2040.
Civic Plaza Park &
Police Station
$ 2,100,000.00 0 $ - $ 79, 000,000.00 3% Measure P; General Fund;
Existing Fund
Balance;
State & Federal
Grants
77% Conceptual
Design
Long-Term Park amenities outlined
in the Park and Rec
Master Plan
Recommendation.
Amenities Include:
Shade Structures
Walking Loop
Splash Pad
Amphitheater
Playground
Monument Sign
Rectangular Field $ 350,000.00 0 $ - $ 350, 000.00 0% Existing DIF Fund Balance
100% Estimate based
on current
construction
costs for similar
projects
Short-Term Park and Rec Master
Plan Recommendation.
Two Lighted fields to be added
at Eva Dell Park
Westside Dog Park $ 100,000.00 0 0 $ 100, 000.00 50% Measure P; General Fund;
Existing Fund
Balance;
State & Federal
Grants
50% Estimate based
on current
construction
costs for similar
projects
Mid-Term The Park & Rec Master
Plan established the
need for (3) dog parks
located within the City.
Cost is for fencing, amenities,
shade structure & ADA access
for a 20,000 sq.ft. dog park.
Sunset Ridge Slash
Pad
$ 795,785.92 2.75 $ 1,692,632.70 $ 2, 488,418.62 50% Measure P; General Fund;
Existing Fund
Balance;
State & Federal
Grants
50% Estimated
based on
current
construction
costs for
projects of a
similar nature
and current
commercial land
prices.
Mid-Term The Park & Rec Master
Plan established the
need for (2) Pools/Water
elements located within
the City.
Cost basis includes a splash
pad; restrooms; equipment
room; shade structures and a
tempered shower tower & 2.75
acre site acquisition.
Westside Pool
Complex
$ 11,000,000.00 0 0 $ 11,000,000.00 50% Measure P; General Fund;
Existing Fund
Balance;
State & Federal
Grants
50% Estimate based
on current
construction
costs for similar
projects
Long-Term The Park & Rec Master
Plan established the
need for (2) Pools/Water
elements located within
the City.
A single mid-sized pool with 14
swim lanes, plus supporting
machinery and facilities
Westside Skatepark $ 1,400,000.00 0 0 $ 4, 000,000.00 50% Measure P; General Fund;
Existing Fund
Balance;
State & Federal
Grants
50% Estimate based
on current
construction
costs for similar
projects
Mid-Term The Park & Rec Master
Plan established the
need for (6) Skate Parks
located within the City.
Estimate is based on a 20,000
(No Suggestions). skatepark
with a restroom facility.
Parks & Recreation
2 Eagle Ranch Park
Restrooms
$ 280,000.00 0 0 $ 350,000.00 0% Existing DIF Fund Balance
100% Estimate from
2007 DIF
Project List
Short-Term Existing Project;
deficiency notated in
Park & Rec Master Plan.
Estimate would cover the
manufacturing and install of a
pre-fabricated unit with two
stalls and approximately 20' x
10'.
Brentwood Park -
Restrooms
$ 280,000.00 0 0 $ 350,000.00 0% Existing DIF Fund Balance
100% Estimate from
2007 DIF
Project List
Short-Term Existing Project;
deficiency notated in
Park & Rec Master Plan.
Estimate would cover the
manufacturing and install of a
pre-fabricated unit with two
stalls and approximately 20' x
10'.
Hook Park - Track
Field Lighting
$ 400,000.00 0 0 $ 400,000.00 0% Existing DIF Fund Balance
100% Estimate based
on
Musco/Lighting
Quote.
Short-Term Park & Rec Master Plan
Recommendation
Estimate would cover the
addition of sports field lighting
at Hook Park's track.
Shade Structure $ 150,000.00 0 0 $ 300,000.00 0% Existing DIF Fund Balance
100% Quote based
on similar
project.
Short-Term Park & Rec Master Plan
Recommendation
30 x 60 shade structure would
be added to Doris Davies Park
to expand covered picnic
areas.
Eva Dell Dog Park $ 150,000.00 0 0 $ 300,000.00 0% Existing Fund Balance;
Measure P
100% Quote based
on similar
project.
Short-Term Park & Rec Master Plan
Recommendation
Project will be combined with
Grant dollars awarded to
renovate Eva Dell Park for
20,000 sq.ft. dog park.
Trails Master Plan $ 50,000.00 0 0 $ 50,000.00 0% Existing DIF Fund Balance
100% Quote based
on similar
project.
Short-Term Park & Rec Master Plan
Recommendation
Estimate would cover a
comprehensive study to
address the need for additional
trails & connectivity throughout
the City.
New Walking Loop $ 150,000.00 0 0 $ 150,000.00 100% Existing DIF Fund Balance
100% Quote based
on similar
project.
Short-Term Park & Rec Master Plan
Recommendation
Create more connectivity
throughout parks system.
1 Any projects without a location specified, project site will be selected using GRASP or other tools from the Park & Recreation Master Plan - 2020 with the goal to improve access to outdoor recreation. 3 Facility Name Facility Cost Site Acres Estimated Site Value
Project Total New
Development
Cost Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative
Funding Cost
Share
Impact Fee Cost
Basis
Timeframe to
Complete
Justification Notes
Central Library
Facility
$ 43,534,968.00 5 $ 3,077,514.00 $ 46,612,482.00 9% Measure P; General Fund;
State & Federal
Grants
91% Based upon the
cost estimation
provided in the
Library Master
Plan.
Long-Term The City's Library Master
Plan estimates a 72,300
Sq. Ft. for the City's
projected population by
2040.
Estimate is for a $72,300 sq.ft.
facility and acquisition for land
at five acres.
Facility Name Facility Cost Site Acres Estimated Site
Value Project Total
New
Development
Cost Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative
Funding Cost
Share
Impact Fee Cost
Basis
Timeframe to
Complete Justification Notes
Central Facilities
Yard
$1,569,600 2 $1,000,000 $2,569,600 50% General Fund 50% Estimated based on
current
commercial land
prices.
Long-Term The City's Facilities staff
is currently only supplied
with an aging, re-
purposed single family
home to utilize as a shop
and has a need for a
larger space that will
allow for larger amounts
of storage and a larger
area for fabrication when
working on projects of a
larger scope.
A central located facility for staff
and facility equipment; includes
acquisition of two acres.
Central Household
Hazardous
Waste/Consolidated
Recycling Facility
$2,040,000 5 $2,000,000 $4,040,000 50% Solid Waste Fund; Landfill Mitigation Fund
50% Estimated
based on
current
commercial land
prices.
Long-Term This property would allow
the City to consolidate it's
recycling efforts in one
location and add some of
the necessary equipment
to sort and divert specific
material types all at one
location.
Facility to house operations
and acquisition of five acres.
Libraries
Public Buildings
4 Facility Name Facility Cost Site Acres Estimated Site Value Project Total
New
Development
Cost Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative
Funding Cost
Share
Impact Fee Cost
Basis
Timeframe to
Complete Justification Notes
Civic Plaza Park &
Police Station
$79,335,000 2.55 $0 $79,335,000 22% American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA)
General Fund
State & Federal
Grants
Parks DIF
78% Based on
estimated
replacement
cost per sq. ft
from DIF Study.
(50,000 sq. ft
PD Building *
$586.70 cost
per sq.ft)
Short-Term Currently the Victorville
Police Station does not
have the capability of
housing additional
personnel and the
construction of a new
Police Department
building on City owned
land would allow the City
to provide and sustain
the current level of public
safety services for the
long-term benefits of the
Victorville residents.
Construction of new facility to
house operations and
acquisition of two and a half
acres.
Facility Name Facility Cost Site Acres Estimated Site
Value Project Total
New
Development
Cost Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative
Funding Cost
Share
Impact Fee Cost
Basis
Timeframe to
Complete Justification Notes
Fire Station 316 $7,000,000 0.98 $149,940 $7,149,940 50% Measure P; General Fund
50% Estimated
based on
current land
prices.
Long-Term The construction of Fire
Station 316 would allow
for the growth and
expansion of the western
part of the City. These
costs are based from the
current DIF Study.
Acquisition of approximately
one acre of land located in
APN book 3133 or 3134 and
construction of a new facility.
Fire Protection
Police Facility
5 Roads, Traffic Signals and Intersection Projects
Road Name From To Estimated Cost Future Customer Costs New Development
Alternative
Funding Source
National Trails Highway At Mojave River Bridge $21,053,775 $15,790,331.00 75% Measure I; General Fund
Mojave Dr. At I-15 Phase 1, 2 to 4 lanes $12,862,800 $3,110,400.00 24% Measure I; General Fund
Mojave Dr. At I-15 Phase 2, 4 to 6 lanes $15,647,665 $15,647,665.00 100% Air Expressway Phantom East National Trails Hwy $11,111,206 $11,111,206 100% Air Expressway At National Trails Hwy $2,102,962 $2,102,962.00 100% Amargosa Rd. Rancho Rd. Village Dr. $3,596,680 $3,596,680.00 100% Amethyst Rd. Rancho Rd. Hopland Rd. $944,453 $472,227.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
Amethyst Rd. Hopland Rd. Mojave Dr. $944,453 $944,453.00 100% Amethyst Rd. Seneca Rd. Palmdale Rd. $1,789,514 $1,789,514.00 100% Amethyst Rd. Sycamore St. Eucalyptus St. $7,000,961 $7,000,961.00 100% Baldy Mesa Rd. Palmdale Rd. La Mesa Rd. $3,579,028 $1,789,514.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
Baldy Mesa Rd. La Mesa Rd. Olivine Rd. $1,193,009 $1,193,009.00 100% Bear Valley Rd. US-395 Monte Vista Rd. $4,584,044 $4,584,044.00 100% Bear Valley Rd. Remuda Rd. 330 ft. W. of Jade Rd. $1,104,242 $1,104,242.00 100% Bellflower Rd. Palmdale Rd. Sycamore St. $8,426,840 $8,426,840.00 100% Cactus Rd. US-395 0.25 mi. E. of US-395 $236,113 $236,113.00 100% Cantina Dr. La Mesa Rd. Palmdale Rd. $1,416,680 $1,416,680.00 100% Cantina Dr. Palmdale Rd.
0.25 mi. N. of Palmdale
Rd. $236,113 $236,113.00 100%
Civic Dr. Mojave Dr. Roy Rogers Dr. $491,116 $491,116.00 100% El Evado Rd. Hopland St. Air Expressway $10,448,383 $10,448,383.00 100% Eucalyptus St. Bellflower Rd. Mesa View Dr. $1,146,011 $573,005.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
Eucalyptus St. Mesa View Dr. US-395 $1,146,011 $1,146,011.00 100% Eucalyptus St. US-395 Mesa Linda Ave. $1,193,009 $1,193,009.00 100% Eucalyptus St. W. of Cobalt Rd. Amargosa Rd. $2,292,022 $2,292,022.00 100% Green Tree Blvd. 7th St. Hesperia Rd. $2,554,307 $2,554,307.00 100% Holly Rd. (Hopland Rd.) US-395 Cobalt Rd. $1,416,680 $708,340.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
DIF Roadway Projects
6 Roads, Traffic Signals and Intersection Projects
Hook Blvd. US-395
0.4 mi. W. of Amethyst
Rd. $1,482,792 $1,482,792.00 100%
La Mesa Rd. White Rd. Baldy Mesa Rd. $2,292,022 $1,146,011.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
La Mesa Rd. Baldy Mesa Rd. Pena Rd. $6,417,661 $6,417,661.00 100% La Mesa Rd. Pena Rd. Cantina Dr. $691,945 $691,945.00 100% La Paz Dr. At I-15 Northbound ramps $679,313 $679,313.00 100% Mojave Dr. Village Dr. Condor Rd. $1,623,555 $1,623,555.00 100% Mojave Dr. Condor Rd. Amargosa Rd. $1,553,324 $1,553,324.00 100% Monte Vista Rd. Bear Valley Rd. Sycamore St. $472,227 $236,114.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
National Trails Highway 200 ft. S. of Turner Rd.
800 ft. S. of Mojave River
Bridge $418,423 $418,423.00 100%
National Trails Highway
N. end of Mojave River
Bridge 1st St. at City Limit $2,248,422 $2,248,422.00 100% Olivine Rd. Cantina Rd. Pena Rd. $283,336 $283,336.00 100% Ottawa St. Mariposa Rd. Third Ave. $1,435,569 $1,435,569.00 100% Ottawa St. Hesperia Rd.
0.43 mi. E. of Hesperia
Rd. $406,115 $406,115.00 100%
Pahute Ave Locust Ave. Balsam Rd. $236,113 $236,113.00 100% Petaluma Rd. Bear Valley Rd.
0.16 mi. NE of Bear Valley
Rd. $151,113 $151,113.00 100%
Rancho Rd. Cobalt Rd. Amethyst Rd. $538,338 $269,169.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
Rancho Rd. Amethyst Rd. El Evado Rd. $1,855,829 $1,855,829.00 100% Rancho Rd. Amargosa Rd. National Trails Highway $1,086,121 $1,086,121.00 100% Seneca Rd. Hesperia Rd. GreenTree Blvd. $1,822,795 $1,822,795.00 100% Seneca Rd. US-395 Topaz Rd. $944,453 $944,453.00 100%
Seneca Rd. Topaz Rd. Amethyst Rd. $944,453 $472,227.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
Smoke Tree Rd. Topaz Rd. Amargosa Rd. $6,031,391 $6,031,391.00 100% Smoke Tree Rd. Mesa Linda St. Topaz Rd. $321,114 $321,114.00 100% Spring Valley Parkway Bear Valley Rd. 0.06 mi. N. of Lindero Rd. $2,832,859 $2,832,859.00 100% Sycamore US-395 Pena Rd. $132,223 $132,223.00 100%
Tamarisk Bear Valley Rd. 414 ft. N. of Lindero St. $725,462 $725,462.00 100% Third Ave. GreenTree Blvd. Nisqualli Rd. $9,981,140 $4,990,570.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
Third Ave. 575 ft. S. of Nisqualli Rd. Silica Rd. $358,892 $358,892.00 100% 7 Roads, Traffic Signals and Intersection Projects
Third Ave. 600 ft. N. of Bear Valley Rd. Bear Valley Rd. $122,779 $122,779.00 100% Topaz Rd. Hopland St. Luna Rd. $3,305,586 $3,305,586.00 100% Topaz Rd. Bear Valley Rd. Sycamore St. $481,671 $481,671.00 100% Topaz Rd. Eucalyptus St. Smoke Tree Rd. $982,231 $982,231.00 100% White Rd. La Mesa Rd. Olivine Rd. $472,227 $236,113.00 50% Measure I; General Fund
Bear Valley Rd. At I-15 $26,950,000 $4,470,736.00 17% Measure I; General Fund
Eucalyptus St. At I-15 $65,758,000 $17,664,703.00 27% Measure I; General Fund
La Mesa Rd. / Nisqualli
Rd. At I-15 $74,683,501 $37,341,751.00 50% Measure I;
General Fund
Monte Vista Rd. Palmdale Rd. Bear Valley Rd. $5,156,000 $5,156,000.00 100% National Trails Highway I-15
0.1 mi. N. of Air
Expressway $14,213,000 $6,964,370.00 49% Measure I;
General Fund
Nisqualli Rd. Balsam Rd. Hesperia Rd. $22,757,000 $11,150,930.00 49% Measure I; General Fund
Bear Valley Rd. Industrial Blvd.
400 ft. E. of Ridgecrest
Rd. $13,328,856 $1,995,794.00 15% Measure I;
General Fund
Green Tree Blvd. Hesperia Rd. City Limit $45,084,000.00 $22,091,160.00 49% Measure I; General Fund
1 Project availability will vary and align with the time the associated project area is developed. 8 Roads, Traffic Signals and Intersection Projects
Road Name From To Estimated Cost Future Customer Costs
New
Development
Amargosa Rd. Village Dr. 0.12 mi. N. of Village Dr. $305,359 $305,359 100% Amargosa Rd. 0.12 mi. N. of Village Dr. 0.40 mi. N. of Village Dr. $897,082 $897,082 100% Amargosa Rd. Air Expressway
0.12 mi. S. of Air
Expressway $384,464 $384,464 100%
Amethyst Rd. Hopland St. 0.20 mi. N. of Hopland St. $640,773 $640,773 100% Hook Blvd. 0.2 mi. E. of US-395 0.4 mi. E. of US-395 $608,734 $608,734 100% Hook Blvd. Diamond Rd. Flamenco Pl. $256,308 $256,308 100% Hopland St. Amethyst Rd.
0.1 mi. W. of Amethyst
Rd. $248,972 $124,486 50%
Hopland St. Amethyst Rd. 0.1 mi. E. of Amethyst Rd. $248,972 $248,972 100% La Mesa Rd. Topaz Rd. 0.10 mi. E. of Topaz Rd. $45,999 $45,999 100% La Mesa Rd. 0.30 mi. E. of Topaz Rd. 0.46 mi. E. of Topaz Rd. $73,599 $73,599 100% Rancho Rd. 0.10 mi. E. of El Evado Rd.
0.12 mi. W. of El Evado
Rd. $704,850 $704,850 100%
Rancho Rd. Village Dr. 0.09 mi. W. of Village Dr. $224,075 $224,075 100% Rancho Rd. 0.33 mi. E. of Boh Ln. 0.78 mi. E. of Boh Ln. $1,074,442 $1,074,442 100% Seneca Rd. 0.46 mi. E. of US-395 0.52 mi. E. of US-395 $320,386 $320,386 100% Seneca Rd. Topaz Rd. 0.08 mi. W. of Topaz Rd. $256,309 $256,309 100% Seneca Rd. 0.34 mi. W. of El Evado Rd. South Trail $295,085 $295,085 100% Topaz Rd. Seneca Rd. 0.15 mi. N. of Seneca Rd. $455,859 $455,859 100% Village Dr.
0.08 mi. W. of Amargosa
Rd.
0.30 mi. W. of Amargosa
Rd. $101,199 $101,199 100%
Village Dr. Rancho Rd. 0.07 mi. N. of Rancho Rd. $83,914 $83,914 100% Village Dr.
0.10 mi. S. of Air
Expressway
0.27 mi. S. of Air
Expressway $203,791 $203,791 100%
Air Expressway 0.32 mi. W. of Village Rd. 0.38 mi. W. of Village Rd. $108,167 $108,167 100% El Evado Rd. 0.1 mi. N. of Hook Bl. 0.37 mi. N. of Hook Bl. $543,831 $543,831 100% Bear Valley Rd. 0.09 mi. W. of Cobalt Rd. 0.19 mi. W. of Cobalt Rd. $229,025 $229,025 100% Bear Valley Rd. 0.2 mi. W. of Topaz Rd. 0.3 mi. W. of Topaz Rd. $229,025 $229,025 100% Mojave Dr. 0.09 mi. E. of El Evado Rd.
0.25 mi. E. of El Evado
Rd. $387,609 $387,609 100%
Mojave Dr. 0.02 mi. E. of Cobalt Rd. 0.03 mi. W. of Cobalt Rd. $121,128 $121,128 100% Under Power Line
9 Roads, Traffic Signals and Intersection Projects
Mojave Dr. 0.22 mi. E. of US-395 0.24 mi. E. of US-395 $48,451 $48,451 100% Estimated Cost Future Customer Costs
New
Development
$550,000 $550,000 100%
1 Project availability will vary and align with the time the associated project area is developed.
AV Bear Valley Road Bridge Widening project
Project Name
Bridge Projects
10 Roads, Traffic Signals and Intersection Projects
Road Name From To Estimated Cost Future Customer Costs
New
Development
Cost Share
Air Expressway 0.1 mi. W. of Gateway St. Phantom West $5,066,502.00 $5,066,502.00 100% Air Expressway Phantom West Phantom East $4,873,159.00 $4,873,159.00 100% Adelanto Rd. Innovation Way Momentum Rd $751,344.00 $751,344.00 100% Adelanto Rd. Momentum Rd El Mirage Rd. $1,659,054.00 $1,659,054.00 100% Gateway St. Air Expressway Innovation Way $1,262,259.00 $1,262,259.00 100% Gateway St. Innovation Way
0.15 mi. No. of
Innovation Way $323,637.00 $323,637.00 100%
Gateway St. 0.15 mi. No. of Innovation Way El Mirage Rd. $2,405,628.00 $2,405,628.00 100% Innovation Way Adelanto Rd. Gateway St. $961,721.00 $961,721.00 100% Innovation Way Gateway St.
0.35 mi. W. of Phantom
West $4,637,382.00 $4,637,382.00 100%
Innovation Way Phantom West
0.28 mi. E. of Phantom
West $792,607.00 $792,607.00 100%
Innovation Way 0.28 mi. E. of Phantom West Nevada Ave. $659,679.00 $659,679.00 100% Innovation Way Nevada Ave. Phantom East $5,353,494.00 $5,353,494.00 100% Phantom East Air Expressway Innovation Way $804,202.00 $804,202.00 100% Phantom East Innovation Way Nevada Ave. $1,084,737.00 $1,084,737.00 100% Phantom West 0.25 mi. W. of Nevada Ave. Nevada Ave. $345,095.00 $345,095.00 100% Nevada Ave. Air Expressway Innovation Way $940,087.00 $940,087.00 100% SCLA Roadway Projects
11 Roads, Traffic Signals and Intersection Projects
Nevada Ave. Innovation Way
0.13 mi. N. of Innovation
Way $251,734.00 $251,734.00 100%
Nevada Ave. 0.13 mi. N. of Innovation Way George Blvd. 250,000 250,000 100% Nevada Ave. George Blvd. Phantom West 1,269,664 1,269,664 100% 1 Project availability will vary and align with the time the associated project area is developed. 12 Road 1 Road 2 Estimated Cost Future Customer Costs
New
Development
Cost Share
Alternative
Funding Source
Alternative
Funding Cost
Share
Air Expressway Village Dr. 396,000$ 396,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Air Expressway National Trails Highway 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Rancho Rd. Amethyst Rd. 396,000$ 396,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Rancho Rd. El Evado Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Rancho Rd. Village Dr. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Rancho Rd. Amargosa Rd. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Rancho Rd. National Trails Highway 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Hopland Rd. Topaz Rd. 264,000$ 264,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Hopland Rd. Amethyst Rd. 396,000$ 396,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Hopland Rd. El Evado Rd. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Amargosa Rd Village Dr. 132,000$ 132,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Mojave Dr. Topaz Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Mojave Dr. Civic Dr. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Hook Blvd. US-395 264,000$ 264,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Hook Blvd. Topaz Rd. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
La Paz Dr. I-15 Northbound Ramp 264,000$ 264,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Seneca Rd. US-395 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Seneca Rd. Topaz Rd. 396,000$ 396,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Citywide Traffic Signals
13 Seneca Rd. Amethyst Rd. 396,000$ 198,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Seneca Rd. Green Tree Blvd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Palmdale Rd. Baldy Mesa Rd. 132,000$ 132,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Palmdale Rd. Bellflower Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Palmdale Rd. Topaz Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Palmdale Rd. Amethyst Rd. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Ottawa St. Mariposa Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Ottawa St. Third Ave. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Ottawa St. Hesperia Rd. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
La Mesa Rd. White Rd. 132,000$ 132,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
La Mesa Rd. Baldy Mesa Rd. 396,000$ 396,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
La Mesa Rd. Monte Vista Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
La Mesa Rd. Bellflower Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
La Mesa Rd. US-395 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
La Mesa Rd. Topaz Rd. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Olivine Rd. US-395 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Bear Valley Rd. Monte Vista Rd. 264,000$ 264,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Bear Valley Rd. Bellflower Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Bear Valley Rd. Third Ave. 264,000$ 264,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Bear Valley Rd. Tamarisk Rd. 264,000$ 264,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
14 Bear Valley Rd. Spring Valley Pkwy (Realigned) 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Sycamore St. US-395 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Eucalyptus St. Topaz Rd. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Eucalyptus St. Amethyst Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Eucalyptus St. Amargosa Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Mesa St. US-395 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Smoke Tree Rd. Topaz Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Smoke Tree Rd. Amargosa Rd. 528,000$ 528,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Green Tree Blvd. 7th St. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Green Tree Blvd. Burning Tree Dr. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Green Tree Blvd. Arrowhead Dr. 528,000$ 264,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Green Tree Blvd. Third Ave. 264,000$ 132,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Green Tree Blvd. Hesperia Rd. 264,000$ 132,000$ 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Nisqualli Road 9th Avenue 900,000$ 900,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Mojave Rd Mesa Linda Ave. 900,000$ 900,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Stoddard Wells Rd. Abbey Lane 900,000$ 900,000$ 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
1 Project availability will vary and align with the time the associated project area is developed. 15 Road 1 Road 2 Estimated Cost Future Customer Costs
New
Development
Cost Share
Alternative
Funding Source
Alternative
Funding Cost
Share
Innovation Way Adelanto Rd. $656,073 $328,036 50% Measure I; General Fund 50%
Air Expressway Gateway Dr. $720,109 $720,109 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Air Expressway Phantom West $460,036 $460,036 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Air Expressway Nevada Ave. $848,181 $848,181 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Air Expressway George $396,000 $396,000 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Air Expressway Phantom East $460,036 $460,036 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Phantom West Innovation Way $656,073 $656,073 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Phantom West Aerospace Dr. $528,000 $528,000 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Phantom West Sabre $656,073 $656,073 100% Measure I;
General Fund 0%
Phantom West Nevada Ave. $528,000 $528,000 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Phantom East Perimeter Rd. $528,000 $528,000 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Innovation Way Gateway Dr. $976,254 $976,254 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Innovation Way Nevada Ave. $528,000 $528,000 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
Phantom East Innovation Way $784,145 $784,145 100% Measure I; General Fund 0%
1 Project availability will vary and align with the time the associated project area is developed.
SCLA Intersection Improvements
16 Water System Improvement Projects
Street From To Length New Development
Total Cost
New Development
Cost Share
Vinton Rd Palmdale Rd Olivine Rd 9,240.00 2,131,852.80$ 100% Wagon Wheel Rd Palmdale Rd La Mesa Rd 7,920.00 1,827,302.40$ 100% Wagon Wheel Rd La Mesa Rd Lindero Rd 5,280.00 1,218,201.60$ 100% Braceo St Palmdale Rd Dos Palmas Rd 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% Braceo St Luna Rd Olivine Rd 5,280.00 1,218,201.60$ 100% Verbena Rd Palmdale Rd Dos Palmas Rd 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% Verbena Rd Luna Rd Sycamore St 10,560.00 2,436,403.20$ 100% Bellflower St Sierra Rd Sycamore St 660.00 152,275.20$ 100% Mesa Linda Ave Hopland St Mojave Dr 5,280.00 1,218,201.60$ 100% Mesa Linda Ave Hook Blvd Palmdale Rd 5,280.00 1,218,201.60$ 100% Topaz Rd Hopland St Mojave Dr 5,280.00 1,218,201.60$ 100% Topaz Rd Hook Blvd Seneca Rd 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% Topaz Rd Palmdale Rd Arvila St 1,980.00 456,825.60$ 100% cobalt Rd Hook Blvd Seneca Rd 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% Cordova Rd Rancho Rd Clovis St 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% Pacoima Rd Seneca Rd Palmdale Rd 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% 17 Water System Improvement Projects
Cahuenga Rd Hopland St Tawney Ridge Ln 4,224.00 974,561.28$ 100% 11th St Verde St Cherry Hill Dr 13,147.20 3,033,321.98$ 100% .25mile E of HWY 395 Mesa St .25 mile south 1,320.00 304,550.40$ 100% Cataba Rd Mesa St .25 mile south 1,320.00 304,550.40$ 100% .5 mile E of Cataba Rd Mesa St .25 mile south 1,848.00 426,370.56$ 100% Dos Palmas Rd Caughlin Rd Braceo St 12,144.00 2,801,863.68$ 100% Dos Palmas Rd Verbena Rd Fuchsia Ln 4,620.00 1,065,926.40$ 100% Luna Rd Caughlin Rd White Rd 5,280.00 1,218,202.06$ 100% Luna Rd Caughlin Rd Braceo St 12,144.00 2,801,863.68$ 100% Luna Rd Monte Vista Rd Daisy Rd 1,320.00 304,550.40$ 100% Luna Rd Bellflower St Fremontia Rd 1,320.00 304,550.40$ 100% La Mesa Rd Caughlin Rd Baldy Mesa Rd 10,560.00 2,436,403.20$ 100% La Mesa Rd Pena Rd Hwy 395 792.00 182,730.24$ 100% Olivine Rd Caughlin Rd Braceo St 12,144.00 2,801,863.68$ 100% Pahute Ave Locust Ave Balsam Rd 1,003.20 231,458.30$ 100% Bear Valley Rd .12 mile E Caughlin Rd Pueblo Trail Rd 4,065.60 938,015.23$ 100% Sycamore St Caughlin Rd Vinton Rd 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% 18 Water System Improvement Projects
Sycamore St Joshua Rd Monte Vista Rd 1,320.00 304,550.40$ 100% Mesa St Hwy 395 .25 mile east 1,320.00 304,550.40$ 100% Hopland St Topaz Rd Cobalt Rd 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% Cactus St Hwy 395 Cobalt Rd 7,480.18 1,725,826.21$ 100% Mojave Dr Topaz Rd Cobalt Rd 2,640.00 609,100.80$ 100% Seneca Rd Hwy 395 Amethyst Rd 10,560.00 2,436,403.20$ 100% Clovis St Cordova Rd El Evado Rd 8,357.71 1,928,291.31$ 100% Rancho Rd Rancho Rd Victoria Drive 5,351.28 1,234,647.32$ 100% Caughlin Rd Palmdale Rd Goss Rd 18,480.00 5,164,420.80$ 100% Vinton Rd Bear Valley Rd Goss Rd 3,960.00 1,106,661.60$ 100% White Rd Palmdale Rd Bear Valley Rd 13,200.00 3,688,872.00$ 100% Baldy Mesa Rd La Mesa Rd Olivine Rd 2,640.00 737,774.40$ 100% Monte Vista Rd Palmdale Rd Dos Palmas Rd 2,640.00 737,774.40$ 100% Monte Vista Rd Olivine Rd Sierra Rd 3,960.00 1,106,661.60$ 100% Bear Valley Rd Caughlin Rd .12 mile east 633.60 177,065.86$ 100% Hopland St Hwy 395 Topaz Rd 5,280.00 1,475,548.80$ 100% Baldy Mesa Rd Palmdale Rd La Mesa Rd 7,920.00 3,543,091.20$ 100% 19 Water System Improvement Projects
Bellflower St Palmdale Rd Luna Rd 5,280.00 2,362,060.80$ 100% La Mesa Rd White Rd Bellflower St 14,784.00 6,613,770.24$ 100% Bear Valley Rd Pena Rd Hwy 394 792.00 405,781.20$ 100% Area 28 - Turnout #5 5,400,000.00$ 80% 1 Project availability will vary and align with the time the associated project area is developed.
Pipelines
20 Sewer Capacity Projects
Master Plan Project From To Estimated Cost New Development Cost Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding
Cost Share
C12 N. of Turner Rd S. of Rancho Rd 4,590,300.00$ 61% Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C13 Village Drive Rancho Rd 5,699,220.00$ 61% Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C14 Cantina Dr Mesa Linda St 831,750.00$ 61% Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C15 Sycamore Amethyst 6,211,913.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C16 North Star Dos Palmas 5,032,080.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C17 Baldy Mesa Monte Vista 3,336,975.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C18 Bell Flower Mesa Linda 6,451,718.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C19 Mesa Linda Cobalt 4,601,025.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C20 Dos Palmas Gaucho CT 5,958,690.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C21 El Evado Amargosa 3,056,610.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C23 Locust Sixth 3,110,685.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C24 W. of Ottawa Pl Third 4,675,560.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C25 Mariposa Burning Tree 1,730,850.00$ 61%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C28 E of Lambert Lane Hesperia 270,420.00$ 61% Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
C34 S. of Tawney Ridge IWWTP 37,977,225.00$ 61% Sewer Fund;
General Fund 39%
New Extension N/A N/A 30,184,583.00$ 100%
Sewer Fund;
General Fund 0%
1 Project availability will vary and align with the time the associated project area is developed. 21 Regional Drainage Facilities
Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Line A-01 45,436,615.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line A-02 4,674,896.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line A-03 8,899,710.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line A-04 7,688,702.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line A-06 23,123,324.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line A-10C 2,816,973.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line A-12 5,255,298.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line A-13 2,726,744.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line B-01 26,397,503.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line D-01 20,959,268.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line D-02 6,875,409.00$ 53% General Fund 47% 22 Regional Drainage Facilities
Line D-03 1,722,404.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line E-01 48,336,814.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line E-02 7,715,120.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line E-03 2,899,514.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line E-04 2,915,617.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line E-05 6,808,749.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line E-06 4,143,998.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line J-01 7,005,617.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line J-02 3,386,741.00$ 53% General Fund 47% Line J-03 4,843,040.00$ 53% General Fund 47% 1 Additional project information can be found in:
23 Regional Drainage Facilities
Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Line A - Hydrology ID 4 649,566.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A - Hydrology ID5 593,902.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A - Hydrology ID 9 483,034.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A - Hydrology ID 10 614,728.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A - Hydrology ID 11 639,122.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A - Hydrology ID 13 814,759.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A - Hydrology ID 16 1,488,032.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A1 - Hydrology ID 6 443,324.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A2 - Hydrology ID 12 179,179.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A3 - Hydrology ID 14 152,379.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line A3 - Hydrology ID 15 334,610.00$ 79% General Fund 21% SCLA - Storm Drain
24 Regional Drainage Facilities
Line B - Hydrology ID 18 495,677.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 19 369,808.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 20 298,163.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 21 635,936.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 25 414,029.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 26 285,220.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 27 356,525.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 28 459,112.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 30 374,926.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 31 954,567.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B - Hydrology ID 24 202,336.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B-1 Hydrology ID 23 66,554.00$ 79% General Fund 21% 25 Regional Drainage Facilities
Line B-1-1 151,710.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line B-2 125,913.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line C Hydrology ID 33.1 23,391.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line C - Hydrology ID 33 28,694.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line C - Hydrology ID 34 70,976.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line C - Hydrology ID 35 150,641.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line C - Hydrology ID 36 260,425.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Line C - Hydrology ID 37 61,486.00$ 79% General Fund 21% 1 Additional project information can be found in the SCLA Specific Plan Update, dated March 2021. 2 Project availability will vary and align with the time the associated project area is developed. 26 Regional Drainage Facilities
Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Air Exwy to Innovation Way 1,150,952.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Innovation Way 2,498,778.00$ 79% General Fund 21% West side of KDP (Innovation to
Momentum) 2,218,612.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Momentum (W. side of KDP to
Adelanto Rd) 696,629.00$ 79% General Fund 21% West of Adelanto Rd 1,045,701.00$ 79% General Fund 21% SCLA - Channel Improvements
27 Regional Drainage Facilities
Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Air Exwy to Innovation Way 119,844.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Innovation Way 209,556.00$ 79% General Fund 21% West side of KDP (Innovation to
Momentum) 190,908.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Momentum (W. side of KDP to
Adelanto Rd) 89,604.00$ 79% General Fund 21% West of Adelanto Rd 112,838.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Air Exwy to Innovation Way 79,040.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Innovation Way 171,600.00$ 79% General Fund 21% West side of KDP (Innovation to
Momentum) 152,360.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Momentum (W. side of KDP to
Adelanto Rd) 47,840.00$ 79% General Fund 21% SCLA - Fencing
SCLA - Access Roads
28 Regional Drainage Facilities
West of Adelanto Rd 71,812.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Flood Control Basin 968,000.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #1 350,416.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #2 290,400.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #3 25,168.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Flood Control Basin 242,926.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #1 150,536.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #2 150,536.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #3 52,553.00$ 79% General Fund 21% SCLA - Asphalt Paving - Access Road
SCLA - Basin Excavation
29 Regional Drainage Facilities
Facility Name Facility Cost
New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Flood Control Basin 137,101.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #1 84,958.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #2 84,958.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #3 29,659.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Flood Control Basin 250,638.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #1 155,315.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #2 155,315.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Water Quality Basin #3 54,221.00$ 79% General Fund 21% SCLA - Fencing
SCLA - Aggregate Base - Access Road
30 Regional Drainage Facilities
Facility Name Facility Cost New Development Cost
Share
Alternative Funding
Source
Alternative Funding Cost
Share
Gateway, S. side of Innovation 288,552.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Innovation, 710' NW of Gateway 288,552.00$ 79% General Fund 21% Adelanto Rd, N. side of
Momentum /Chamberlaine Way 288,552.00$ 79% General Fund 21% 1 Additional project information can be found in the SCLA Specific Plan Update, dated March 2021.
SCLA - Box Culverts
31