Victorville City Council
January 16, 2024

Visite www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate para obt ener actualizaciones, horarios de próximas reuniones, enlaces a encuestas y más.

Si tiene preguntas sobre el taller de vivienda y la Actualización del Plan General de la Ciudad, llame al Departa
mento de Planificación al (760) 955-5135.
90 Community Workshop #1 (February 1, 2021)
Stakeholder List
(Stakeholders contacted for Workshops #1 & #2)

91 Workshop #1 Workshop #2
Bamidbar Shei Ma'alah x
Burning Bush Church x
Victory Outreach Victorville x
New Destiny Church x
Unitarian-Universalist Society of the High Desert x
Gate of the Desert x
St. Joan of Arc-Catholic Church x
High Desert Church x
Golden Years Elderly Care Inc x
Gracelight Home Health x
MHS Helping Hands Kinship x
Impressions at Valley Center x
Northgate Village x x
Rodeo Drive Meadows x
Sherwood Villa Apartments x
Summer Breeze Apartments x
Newporter Apartments x
Department of Behavioral Health x
Mercy Housing x x
Jamboree Housing Corporation x x
Jamboree Housing Corporation x
Habitat for Humanity, Los Angeles x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Valley Union High School District x
Victor Valley Union High School District x
Victor Valley Union High School District x
Victor Valley Union High School District x
Bradco - Joe Brady x x
High Desert Association of Realtors - Diana Carlton x x High Desert Association of Realtors - Don Brown x
Providence - Suzanne Schwab x x
Abundant Living Family Church x
Acore Solution x
TABLE A-1. LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS CONTACTED
92 Workshop #1 Workshop #2
Assistance League of Victor Valley x
Catholic Charities x
Cedar House x
Community Health Action Network x
Court Appointed Special Advocates of San Bernadino x
EAH Housing x
Family Assistance Program x x
Foothill AIDS Project x
Global Institute for Public Strategies x x
God's Hand Extended x
High Desert Community Foundation x
High Desert Homeless Services, Inc. x x
High Desert Second Chance x
High Desert Transitional Living Connection x
Housing for All Corporation x
Inland Empire United Way x
Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board x
Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino x
Lesly's CPR x
Millionaire Mind Kids x
National Community Renaissance x
Orenda Veterans Project x
Rolling Start x
Samaritan's Helping Hand x
St. Joan of Arc x x
St. John of God Health Care Services x
St. Joseph Health St. Mary x x
Victor Valley Community Services Council x
Victor Valley Family Resource Center x
Victor Valley Rescue Mission x x
Victorville Senior Citizens Club Inc. x
Voices for Immigrants x x
Wawela Cancer Support x
Women of Noble Character x
Burrtec Waste Industries x
County Service Area 64 x
Frontier California, Inc. x
Mojave Water Agency x
Southwest Gas Corporation x
Victor Elementary School District x
VV Union High School District x
Adelanto Elementary School District x
Hesperia Unified School District x
City of Adelanto x
Building Industries Association x x
93 Workshop #1 Workshop #2
Victorville Chamber of Commerce x
Caltrans x x
Department of Fish and Wildlife x
Flood Control District x
Mojave Desert AQMD x
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) x x
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) x VVTA x
Charles Speelman x
Claudia Harris x
Cynthia White x
Elaine Navarrete x x
HOPE Team x
LaRon Whitfield x
Margaret Diaz x x
Martha Powell x
Mike Catalano x x
Roger LaPlante x
Stacy DeVoll x
Susan Drake x x
Tanya Benitez x
Tony McCampbell x
Linda Ingle-Calloway x x
Alyce Belford x
Amber Allen x
Andrew Gruchy x
Christal Hampton x
Daniel Herrera Garcia x x
Delbert Stanley x x
Dr. Shawn Smith x x
Ernest Rios x
Gregory Lincoln x x
Inger Robertson x
Jackie Rocha x x
Jason Judkins x
Jennifer Neri x
John Simmons x
Karla Franko x
Laura Davis x
Lori Smith x x
Maria Razo x
Mike Jones x x
Regina Linares x x
Rene Keres x
Sergeant John Rodriguez x
94 Workshop #1 Workshop #2
Silvia I. Urenda x
Veronica Dugay x
Adam x
Anthony Kim x
Bob Shiota x
Brian Waterhouse x
Carl x x
Carlos Rodriguez x
Dan Tate x
Deputy Snyder x
Giselle x
Gordon - BIA x
Jane Warren x
Katherine Duncan x x
khanni krish x
Kim Sampson x
Leah Anderson x
Liz Hewson x
Martin Estacio x x
Ramiro Rodriguez x
Satcey x x
Susan Pierce x
Veronica Tavares x
VV Chamber x
William Hogan x x
Rob Kurth Contact x
95 Community Workshop #1 (February 1, 2021)
Social Media

96 Facebook (English & Spanish):

97 98

99 Instagram (English & Spanish):

100

101
Twitter (English & Spanish):

102

103
Community Workshop #1 (February 1, 2021)
Agenda

104
ZOOM

VICTORVILLE, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov

PLANNING COMMISSION

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
FEBRUARY 1, 2021
ZOOM
Notice to the Public : This meeting is being held in accordance with the Brown Act that is currently in effect under the State Emergency Services Act, the Governor’s Emergency Declaration related to COVID-19, and the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 issued on March 17, 2020. In order to minimize the spread of COVID-19, City Council Chambers will be closed to the public.

Members of the public can observe the meeting using Zoom or YouTube.

To join via Computer, Laptop, or Smart Device:

Click the blue Zoom icon located on the City’s website
at victorvilleca.gov/government/agendas or enter the following:

Meeting ID: 914 8110 7090
Passcode: VV123
*To provide comment, click the “Raise Hand” button and the Clerk will unmute you.

To join via Audio only (cell phone or landline):

Dial: (669) 900-9128
Meeting ID: 914 8110 7090
*To provide comment dial *9 to “Raise Hand”
Email: If you would like to provide comments to be read into the record, please email your comments to [email protected] no later than 4 p.m. the day of the meeting. Please include the Agenda Item number or indicate General Public Comment in the subject line.

Participants will be given the opportunity to address the Commission during the comment period of each agenda item or during Public Comment. Each person is allotted three (3) minutes. Should the speaker conclude their comments prior to the expiration of three (3) minutes, the speaker waives the rights to speak for any remaining amount of time.
105
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (760) 955-5135 no later than 72 hours prior to the meeting.

Call to Order
Roll Call
5:00 PM Special Meeting
Call
to Order
Roll Call
Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
Special Orders of the Day Presentation
To Recognize Planning Commissioner Larry Huber's Service to the City of Victorville Swearing in of New Commissioner Cook-Askins, Jr. and Commissioner Jurth for another Term
Roll Call
Call for Nominations for Chair and Vice Chair
Public Hearing
6th Cycle Update to the City’s Housing Element
Public Comments
Presentation
of Reports by Commission Members and Staff
Adjournment
106
Community Workshop #1 (February 1, 2021)
Presentation

107
2 VICTORVILLE

GENERAL
PLAN

UPDATES
02/01/2021
108
3 • Team Overview
• How to P
articipate in Today’s Workshop
• General Plan
• Proposed Updates
 Housing
 Land Use
 Safety
 Environmental Justice
• Questions
• 2021-2029 Housing Element Update
109
4 GENERAL PLAN UPDATES
TEAM
Hitt
a Mosesman
Harris &
Associates
Dima Galkin
Harris & Associates
Scott Webb
City of Victorville
110
5 Scott Webb &
Michael S
zarzynski
City Staff
Harris &
Associate
s
Consultants
Hitta Mosesman &
Dima Galki
n
Housing
Claudia Tedford &
Patrici
a Bluman
(CPP)
Land Use
Eric Vaughn &
Carolyn Yv
ellez
Safety and Environmental Justice
Diane Sandman &
Kristin
Blackson
Environmental

GENERAL

PLAN UPDATES - COMPLETE TEAM
111
6 Meeting etiquette to allow everyone to participate
• During t
he presentation
• Audience will be muted.
• If you have a question, type it into Chat Box.
• After the presentation
• Questions in Chat Box answered first.
• After Chat questions answered, click the Raised Hand. • Please be mindful of background noise when not on mute.

HOW TO PARTICIPATE

SHARE YOUR IDEAS WITH US VIA ZOOM
112
7 • Primary Community Planning
Documen
t
• Required by State Law
• Chapters are Called “Elements”
• Bluepri
nt for community’s future
development (long-term vision)
• Goals, Policies & Actions
GENERA

L PLAN OVERVIEW
BASICS
• Land Use
• Housing
• Saf
ety
• Environmental Justice (new)
• Conservation
• Open Sp
ace
• Circulation
• Noise
Visit the City’s website: http://www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate 113
8 HOUSING ELEMENT PRINCIPLES

ROLE OF

HOUSING ELEMENT
• Required by State Law & Updated Every 8 Years
• Purpose -
Plan for Adequate Housing For All
Residents
• More Spec
ific Information Other Elements
• Consistent With Other Elements (Land Use)
• Public Meetings in February & March
• http://www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate
• English survey: https: //arcg.is/1zPCaz
• Spanish survey: https: //arcg.is/084ym8
114
9 • Where Specific Land Uses will be in City
• (Reside
ntial, Commercial, Industrial, Agricultural & Open Space) • Reflect Community’s Vision
• Purpose - Equitable/Accessible Distribution of Future Land Uses • Interacts with All Other Elements
• Public
Engagement - Planning Commission Workshops (February
& May)
• http://
www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate
• English survey: https:/ /arcg.is/1zPCaz
• Spanish survey: https:/ /arcg.is/084ym8

LAND USE ELEMENT PRINCIPLES

ROLE OF

LAND USE ELEMENT
115
10 SAFETY ELEMENT PRINCIPLES

ROLE OF

SAFETY ELEMENT
• Purpose - ID & Reduce Impacts of Natural/Man-Made Disasters • Fire, Flood, Drought, Earthquake, Climate Change,
Hazardous
Materials, etc.
• Goals & Policies Reducing Risk, Disaster Prevention & Preparedness
• Prevent/Reduce Death, Injury, Property Damage,
Dislocation
• Emergency Care & Response
• Public Engagement - Safety Committee (in process)
• Police, Fire, Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Power, Parks & Educat
ion (Open to Public)
116
11 • Required for Identified Disadvantaged Communities
• Purpos
e - Plan for Equitable Distribution of Public
Facilities/Services to Enhance Community Quality of Life • Clean air
• Access to fresh food
• Safe and sanitary housing
• More access to public facilities
• Physical activity
• Civic engagement

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ELEMENT PRINCIPLES

ROLE OF ENVIRONMENT AL JUSTICE ELEMENT
117
12 • Public Engagement - Communi ty Advisory Council (CAC) • Interested in CAC/Provide Input:
• Englis
h: https://arcg.is/WDb9j
• Spanish: https://arcg.is/0LiSuD
• CAC Meetings - March – May
ENVIRO

NMENTAL JUSTICE ELEMENT

COMPLETE ONLINE SURVEY
118
13 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WHY IS
IT NEEDED?
• Required Under California Environmental Quality Act
• Analysi
s Of Potential Physical Impacts Resulting from Housing, Land Use, Environmental Justice & Safety Element Policies • Environmental Impact Report
119
14 OVERALL PROJECT SCHEDULE
Housing Element
Survey – March 15
Draft – May 12
Final – August 12
Plan. Comm. / Council
Approva
l – Sept.

Land Use Element
Survey – March 15
Draft – July (est.)
Final – Sept. (est.)
Plan. Comm. / Council
Approva
l – Jan. 2022 (est.)
Safety Element
Committee – Feb/March -
May
Draft - July
Final – August (est.)
Plan. Comm. / Council
Approva
l – Jan. 2022 (est.)
Environmental Justice
Element
CAC Formed and Meet –
Feb. – May
Draft – July
Final – August (est.)
Plan. Comm. / Council
Approva
l – Jan. 2022 (est.)
120
15 PUBLIC MEETINGS
Safety Element Meetings
March-May (currently being formed) – 2 Meetings
Environmental Justice CAC
March – May (currently being formed) – 3 Meetings
Land Use Element Workshops
#1 - February 24
#2 – May 26
Housing Element Workshops
#1 - February 1
#2 – March 22
121
16 QUESTIONS &

COMMENTS
Visi
t the City’s website:
http://www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate
122
17 123
18 2021-2029

HOUSING

ELEMENT
UPDATE
PUBLIC WORKSHOP #1
02/01/20
21 124
19 AGENDA
• What is Housing Element?
• What is
Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA)?
• Preliminary Site Inventory
• Ways to Get Involved
• Next Steps: Housing Element Update Schedule
• Questions
125
20 HOUSING ELEMENT
BASICS
126
21 • Primary planning document to address City’s housing needs • State
Law requirement for all cities & counties
• Housing needs of residents of all income levels
• State Department of Housing and Community Development reviews and certifies
WHAT IS A HOUSING ELEMENT?
127
22 WHAT’S IN A HOUSING ELEMENT?
• Community Characteristics:
• Populat
ion, income, employment
• Existing & Projected Housing Needs by Category
• (Challenges and Opportunities)
• Goals & Objectives/Programs & Policies to Address
Housing Needs
• List of Land for Future Housing at Different Income
Levels
128
23 • Every 8 Years Required by State Law
• Update
s in State Housing Laws
• Shows How City will Facilitate Housing
Demand/Growth
• Allows Eligibility for State Funding for Housing
• Involves Community in Housing Planning
Process

WHY IS THE HOUSING ELEMENT

BEING UP
DATED?
129
24 • Public involvement first and present draft/final to Plannin
g Commission/Council
• Submitted to HCD for certification
• “Certified” means State officially certifies State
Law compliance
• Benefits of certification include:
o Eligibility for state funding and assistance programs o Demonstrates ability to plan for Housing Needs

HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE & APPROVAL PROCESS
130
25 Regional Housing Needs
Assessme
nt (RHNA)
131
26 • This is for description
text,
you have options
for bullets or paragraph.
• Second level

CALLOUT
WHAT IS VICTORVILLE’S REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS

ASSESSM
ENT?
State
Allocat
es
Housing
Units to
Each Region
Victorville
in SCAG
R
egion
SCAG
Region =

1.3 million
units
Victorville’s
share =
8 ,146
132
27 VICTORVILLE’S RHNA ALLOCATION
6TH CYCLE (2021-2029)
Income Category % of Area
Median
Income
Income Range
Minimum*
Income Range
Maximum*
RHNA Allocation
(Housing Units)
% of Total
Extremely low /
Very low i
ncome
0 – 50% MFI -- $37,650 1,731 21.2%
Low income 50% - 80% MFI $37,651 $60,240 1,134 13.9%
Moderate income 81% - 120% MFI $60,241 $90,360 1,500 18.4% Above moderate
income
120%+ MFI $90,361 $91,361+ 3,781 46.4%
TOTAL 8,146
*Income range is based on the HCD 2020 State Income Limits for San Bernardino County of $75,300 for a 4-person household.
133
28 • List of All Properties Must = RHNA
• Fair H
ousing Requirements
• Affordable Units Spread
Throughout City
• Zone Changes Potentially Required
REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT – SITE INVENTORY
Site # of
Units
Income
Category
Site # 1 20 Very Low
Site #
2 50 Moderate
Site # 3 10 Above Moderate
Site # 4 75 Low
Site # 5 15 Very Low
Site # 6 100 Moderate
Site # 7 18 Low
Site # 8 5 Above Moderate
Site # 9 25 Moderate
Site # 10 10 Very Low
Total 328
134
29 SITE INVENTORY – OLD TOWN
JG10
135
30 SITE INVENTORY – 7TH STREET
JG10
136
31 SITE INVENTORY – CIVIC CENTER
JG10
137
32 SITE INVENTORY – SOUTH OF NISQUALLI
JG10
138
33 SITE INVENTORY – ST. MARY MEDICAL CAMPUS
Potentia
l Hospital Campus
JG10
139
34 SITE INVENTORY – WALMART SUPERCENTER
JG10
140
35 • Complete online survey
• 2nd publi
c workshop,
March 22, 2
021
• RHNA Sites Inventory

OUTREACH OPPORTUNITIES
• Draft Housing Element –
Public Rev
iew
• Public hearings before
Planning Commission &
Council
141
36 WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU

COMPLET

E ONLINE SURVEY
Provide input, suggestions, and concerns by taking our onli ne survey! • Visit the City’s Housing Element webpage
http://www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate
• English survey: https:/ /arcg.is/1zPCaz
• Spanish survey: https:/ /arcg.is/084ym8
142
37 NEXT STEPS

PROJECT

SCHEDULE

MAY - JULY
• HCD Review
(Draft)
MA
Y
• Planning
Commission
,
City Council
Study
Sessions
MARCH
• Public Outreach/
Workshop
#2

JANUARY -

FEBRUARY
• Site Inventory
Please join us at the next public workshop in March!

SEPTEMBER
- OCTOBE
R
• City Council
approval,

submit to HCD
143
38 QUESTIONS &

FEEDBACK
144
39 THANK YOU!
Scott We
bb
City Plan
ner
(760) 955-5135
[email protected]
Questions? Comments?
Please e
mail [email protected] or contact:

Hitta Mosesman, hitta.Mose [email protected] or
Dima Galkin, dima.Galki [email protected]
Visit the City’s website: http:// www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate 145
Community Workshop #1 (February 1, 2021)
Meeting Notes

146

VICTORVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP

GENERAL PLAN/ 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE

February 1, 2021 @ 5pm

Meeting Notes

Attendees:

1. Paul Marsh

2. Dima Galkin

3. Melissa Nelson

4. Scott Webb

5. Irlanda Martinez

6. Kenneth Cook-Askins

7. Larry Huber

8. Karem Ostrom

9. Hitta Mosesman

10. Debra Jones

11. Frank Tanner

12. Charlene Johnson

13. Fannie

14. Etta

15. Frank Kelly

16. Council member Bec

17. Sandie

18. Terry

19. Valentin Godina

20. Cori Steelman

21. Lmarin

22. Jessica

23. Rob Kurth

24. Bob Harriman

25. James Murawski

26. Jenele Davidson

27. Denise Wells

28. S. Cobb

29. Gregory Cook

30. Jorge Duran

31. Betty Henderson

32. Armando C. Jr

33. Lesyenia Pineda

34. Stephanie

35. Travis Clark

36. Bill Thomas

37. Greg Devereaux

38. Melissa

39. Steph Vida Paza

40. Claudia Tedford

41. Don Brown

42. Patricia Bluman

43. Bret Thorpe

44. Kisha Collier

45. Tara Taguchi

46. Suzanne Schwab

47. Alex Jauregui

48. Jorge Duran

49. 909-***-*148

50. “Others up to 70”

Notes

1. Recognizing Planning Commissioner Larry Huber's Service to the City of Victorville

2. Swearing in of New Commissioner Cook-Askins, Jr. and Commissioner Kurth for another Term

3. General Plan Update Public Workshop

a. Overview of presentation – We will present a general overview of all the General Plan updates, pause for questions, then present on Housing Element. i. Introduce to the team, go over how tonight’s workshop will work and how people can participate, what a general plan is, each of the general plan 147
updates at a high level, questions, then presentation on the Housing Element specifically.

Note: These minutes focus on public comments. The details of the presentation are available for review in the PowerPoint.
b. Introduction
i. Illustration of team.
ii. How to participate.
c. General Plan overview.
i. Housing Element. Survey is available online.

1. We encourage everyone to participate.
ii. Land Use Element.
iii. Safety Element.
iv. Environmental Justice Element.
v. Environmental Assessment.
vi. Overall project schedule.

1. Housing Element schedule dictated by deadline for submission to State.
vii. Public Meetings.
viii. Questions.

1. How will the EJ CAC be formed? Express your interest in the EJE/SE survey. City staff will select CAC members.

2. Is there a vetting process? Ideally, members would have experience dealing with environmental justice.

3. Have there been social media posts about this? Not yet. We were hoping that survey responses would provide a basis to select committee members.

4. Can we show the slide with the Element adoption schedule again? Yes. The slide was shown.

5. Will there be an opportunity hear the strategies and policies the team is looking to adopt re: the Housing Element? Yes, we will have public hearings and the draft Housing Element will be available for the public to review.

6. Will the team make sure the affordable housing RHNA
requirement is met and evaluate expiring covenants? Yes, we are required to, and will, look at expiring affordability covenants.

Stay tuned for the Housing Element presentation coming up later this evening. We welcome input, including on the survey, as well as reaching out to us on the team, and participating in the March workshop.

7. Can the presentation be shared? Yes, it will be available online and by request to the emails provided.

In Spanish, the Harris team asked if anyone has any questions or comments to share.
d. Housing Element Update.
i. Agenda: What it is, what is RHNA, site inventory, ways to get involved, next steps, questions.
ii. What is a housing element.
iii. What’s in a housing element.
iv. Why is the Housing Element being updated?
148
v. Housing Element update and approval process.
vi. RHNA – State does population projections and allocates needs to COGs. vii. Victorville’s RHNA allocation – walk through the allocation at each income level.
viii. RHNA Site Inventory – walk through site inventory requirements and fair housing requirements.
ix. Site inventory slides – Still in preliminary stage, identifying large areas, at which we will look more closely.
x. Outreach opportunities
xi. We want to hear from you – Website and survey information. xii. Next Steps – Project schedule.
xiii. Questions & Answers

1. Scott’s comment: Make it clear for the audience that if a property is classified in a certain income category, the City is not dictating that the owner build in that income category. The site inventory will have flexibility to allow property owners to build in any income category.

2. Will the study sessions be open to the public? Yes.

3. How does the 8,146 allocation of the 6th cycle compare to the allocat
ion of the 5th cycle? It’s not vastly different for Victorville.

For SC
AG region, allocation was much larger than in 5th cycle, but SCAG sh
ifted allocation to the coast, consistent with SCAG’s
transportation plans. Current 8-year cycle was just over 7,200 units. The new cycle adds ~1,000. Some coastal cities have double or triple the number of units from the previous cycle.

4. Did we meet our RHNA numbers during the past cycle? Most cities did not meet their 5th cycle. The RHNAs are usually quite large,
and residential development can be controversial.

Clarifying, distinction between planning for units (creating capacity within the zoning code) and building the units. City adequately planned for RHNA units, but the units were not built, due to market factors and other considerations.

5. Will densities in the current general plan / zoning be considered for change? We’re current in initial stages. There is a State requirement that sites designated for lower-income housing has to be 20-30 units per acre. [Postscript, this varies based on city size and location within or out of a metropolitan County. For Victorville, being located in the Riverside-San Bernardino Metro Area and having more than 25,000 residents means the
applicable density is 30 units per acre.] We will have to adhere to that requirement. We’re in the beginning stage of identifying where the sites will be located and if there will be a need for rezoning.

Stay tuned! If you would like to see density in certain places or have a density comment, please email us.

6. Will some areas be exempt from the housing target? Open space areas are exempt. Victorville has a large amount of vacant property, compared to built-out cities. We don’t anticipate a challenge to identifying sites. High fire areas, areas subject to flooding or used for agriculture will be exempt.

7. Is there planning for specific senior housing? In the housing element, we look at special groups, per a state requirement. 149
Seniors is one of the groups. Any input on the needs for senior housing, or good locations, is welcome.

8. Do we expect RHNA changes to continue, knowing that CA population growth is slowing / people are moving out of state? It does not affect the current cycle. There may be a change for the next cycle.

9. Please advise on the total number of units built in the current RHNA cycle? A lot of factors came into play – coming out of the Great Recession, the dissolution of Redevelopment. It’s less than 2,000 units.

10. Will there be any incentives for developers to build low income or senior housing? As we develop the list of sites (site inventory), we will identify the numbers of units and income levels.

The Housing Element will identify funding sources. Affordable housing requires public subsidy. That’s why it’s been a challenge.

We will identify funding sources to fill the affordability gap. There are multiple funding sources, like LIHTC and state grants, which have partially replaced Redevelopment money (for affordable housing). The financial incentives will be focused on state and federal sources. With Redevelopment dissolution in 2012, local governments don’t have funding to offer incentives, for the most part. That is one of the challenges of building affordable housing.

There will be incentives, but pieces will need to be assembled. If property owners / developers have identified impediments to development, we want to know what those are to consider zoning code changes to alleviate those impediments and replace them with incentives.

11. Scott: Housing Element relates to the Land Use Element. E.g., higher densities will be reflected in the Land Use Element update.

First Land Use Element update is schedule for February 24.

12. Scott: On the City website, you can sign up for our mailers. If you didn’t get a notice through email for this meeting, please visit the website and put in your email address.

13. Hitta: We will engage with the developer community to understand.

14. Scott’s comment: Less infrastructure on west side of town, not likely to see MFR there.

150
Community Workshop #1 (February 1, 2021)
Archived Meeting Items

151
Agenda Packet & Video Link (City Website):
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/agendas
Meeting Video (YouTube):

152

BUILDING ASSOCIATION STRATEGY SESSION
(FEBRUARY 5, 2021)
• Meeting Agenda
• Notes

153
Building Association Strategy Session
(February 5, 2021)
Meeting Agenda

154

Victorville Meeting Agenda
2/5/21

I. Introductions

II. City Update
a. COVID-19 and City Operations
b. RHNA and Housing Element Update

III. Vinyl Fence at interior side and rear lots
a. March Workshop

IV. Lot Sizes

V. Design Guidelines (see attached)

VI. Other Recommendations/topics

1. Pedestrian bypass sidewalk

2. Citizens Access Portal website

3. Subdivision Checklist - Notably for bond requirements, encroachment permit processes and requirements, etc.

4. Fee payment process

5. Corner lot enhancements

6. Lot drainage

7. Site design of curvilinear streets

8. Drywell use

155
Building Association Strategy Session
(February 5, 2021)
Meeting Notes

156

VICTORVILLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE

MEETING WITH BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

February 5, 2021 @ 3:00 PM

Meeting Notes

Attendees:

1. City Staff #1

2. City Staff #2

3. Attendee #1

4. Consultant #1

5. Consultant #2

6. Consultant #3

7. Attendee #2

8. Attendee #3

9. Attendee #4

10. Attendee #5

Notes

1. Introductions

2. City Update

a. COVID-19 and City Operations
b. RHNA and Housing Element Update

3. Developer Feedback
a. Attendee #3:
i. We can build 6-7 du/ac at moderate income
ii. 125 units in Victorville in moderate and above-moderate range. b. Attendee #5:
i. Turning renters into buyers.
ii. Not front-loading, overspending, carrying costs.
iii. Lot sizes: need for evolution to 4000 sq.ft. lots. Current minimum is 7200. c. City Staff #1:
i. Work within current general plan.
ii. Overlay district to allow some flexibility, but ensure quality development. d. Attendee #1:
i. Vinyl fencing.
ii. 8 du/ac density.
iii. When would we do discussion on vinyl fencing?
e. City Staff #1:
i. Issue needs to be aired if you want planning commission to consider it. ii. Related to type of product and price point and density iii. I don't want to stop developers from engaging planning commission. iv. Went through this 10 years ago and struggled to get development community to adopt block walls.
v. Several workshops occurring where fence material issue could be presented.
f. Attendee #1:
i. Which workshop would work best?
157
g. Consultant #2:
i. Our first workshop for land use element is more focused on big picture; community to let us know what is most important.
ii. One of the things that can be discussed is density (address missing middle).

1. new land uses or overlays
iii. May be an opportunity for a bridge between single family and townhouses

1. provide opportunities for moderate, below-moderate
iv. Fencing is too detailed for that first meeting (development standards) h. Attendee #2:
i. Phasing the CFDs and single family design guidelines. ii. Current writing frontloads amenities.

1. Project where phase 1 of 8 need to build a bridge or park. iii. Minimum of 50 lots for phased tract map; seems like an arbitrary number. iv. Like to see in R-1 possibility to have 10ft. porch and 12ft. for 1 story and 18ft for 2 story so we can have variation in set-back.
v. 12-15 foot setback for backyard for 1 and 2 stories. vi. Flag lots are more helpful than pie shaped lots for allowing paseo. i. Attendee #4:
i. A lot of these items are not controversial.
ii. Used in other cities.
iii. 2017-18 #1 selling project in the Mojave River Valley was the *polty project in Apple Valley on 4000 sq.ft. lots.
iv. Need flexibility in designing projects.
j. City Staff #1:
i. Would hold off on density.
ii. Not a lot of developers asking about flag lots.
158

STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH - DEVELOPER
MEETING #1 (MARCH 9, 2021)
• Notes

159

VICTORVILLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE

HOUSING DEVELOPER STRATEGY SESSION #1 NOTES

March 9, 2021 @ 4:00 PM

Meeting Notes

Attendees:

1. Attendee #1

2. Attendee #2

3. Attendee #3

4. Attendee #4

5. Attendee #5

6. City Staff #1

7. Consultant #1

8. Consultant #2

Notes

1. What are some challenges and opportunities you face as a developer while trying to develop housing / affordable housing in a community like Victorville? a. Attendee #1: Multifamily and shopping center developer. Challenge – amount of utility allowances (for affordable housing) in SB County, drastically reduces the rent and almost doesn’t make a project pencil. High cost of fees, especially on top of high construction costs (e.g., high cost of lumber). b. Attendee #5: Zoning issues, out of date general plans, and staffers not being on the same page between departments re: interpreting general plan and zoning.

Funding is always a challenge, but right now zoning issues stick out. c. Attendee #3: Only do 100% affordable. Almost always local funding or land is needed to do a project. Depending on what City is open to and what resources are available. When City is more flexible, that makes it easier, i.e., allowing developer to pursue certain types of funding.
d. Attendee #4: ED organization based out of Ontario, help developers and communities advance projects. Don’t develop housing much. Try to avoid prevailing wage by avoiding state or local funding. Would prefer to have city identify types of projects and funding sources.
e. Attendee #5: Need consistency in direction provided from Council with what staff is applying and what plans state / how they are interpreted. f. Attendee #3: In Old Town, height is dictated by what’s already built next door.

That makes it harder to build affordable housing if neighboring buildings are short.
g. Attendee #4: Prevailing wage turns away impact investors. What ends up happening is the City preps the site, leases it to a developer at market, and the developer builds a mostly market rate projects, with a few affordable units.

2. Are there any constraints with obtaining loans (construction and/or permanent) for a project in Victorville?
a. Attendee #2: SB 1 and SB 2 refilled some HCD “pots” (Joe Cerna and MHP).

MHP tie breaker is deeper affordability. It’s an issue because most cities and 160
counties don’t have vouchers, to achieve deeper affordability is very difficult. SB County is more voucher-constrained than LA County. One project was changed to veterans because of availability of VASH vouchers.

3. Have you encountered any programs, procedures, or incentives in other cities that have significantly facilitated housing development?
a. Attendee #1: Working with 3 cities. 1 is giving incentive on setback. Another city is giving density bonus, still working through details. b. SS: Cash is the biggest thing that would help. Doesn’t have to be local, could come from county. Or land if cash isn’t available. Cash, preferably as residual receipts loan. Density bonuses, etc. – State has come out with so many different things, as long as City doesn’t fight on it, it’s pretty easy to get the bonuses and additional incentives we need. Transit helps a lot. A transit oriented site that’s 100% affordable allows up to 3 stories everywhere in CA. c. DY: Impact fee waivers are helpful. Separately, in Coachella Valley, inclusionary housing fees on market rate projects are being done. In-lieu fees are helpful to create funding for affordable housing projects.
d. SS: Projects in Santa Monica with inclusionary requirements have market rate developers essentially giving land to affordable housing developers to take care of the inclusionary requirement.
e. GK: Ontario and National Core have worked to attract credit investor (bank who issued the loan) in an OZ – allowed investor to leverage the return to reduce the cost of capital. Leveraging OZ where census tracts are qualified. Victorville should look into this, speak to banks that have capital to deploy.

4. As funding for affordable housing is severely limited, what types of things can the City do to incentivize affordable housing projects (e.g., zoning, fee deferrals, streamlining, etc.)? a. SS: Streamlining and other incentives are extremely helpful. Funding is #1 helpful item. After that, anything to speed up the process is extremely helpful. b. DY: Need entitlements to apply for funding sources. Local government approval is helpful. We have used SB 35 and fast tracking with Counties. c. DH: Grand Terrace did streamlining well.
d. SS: Santa Monica does a good job with streamlining, especially for affordable housing.
e. Attendee #1: Haven’t found streamlining yet. Everything is taking way too long.

Some cities use COVID as an excuse to take longer whether to deem a submission complete.

5. Have you considered a project in Victorville or the High Desert area within the last 3 years? Why or why not?
a. Attendee #1: Currently under construction of 186 units in Hesperia. May be doing another 50 units there. These are market rate projects, due to utility allowance.

Looking at a 310 unit project in Victorville with 20% low income. b. SS: Looked at downtown land and are looking at possible ways to make it work. c. DY: Closest having come to Victorville is Apple Valley. Currently negotiating a DDA for 100 units multifamily with a health clinic component. Partnered with Providence St. Mary for mobile clinics with dental and health services. 161
d. DH: High Desert is one of the target markets. Want to be more engaged with projects in Victor Valley. Victorville approached us, and Gil was involved in the tour.
e. Attendee #1: Very vested in Hesperia and Victorville. 486 units in Victorville owned and managed. Several hundred in Hesperia. Still consider it a good market.

6. In your opinion, what are some creative housing solutions that would help a city like Victorville develop more housing / affordable housing?
a. Find funders with an appetite in investing in that market. We identified a few of them 7 or 8 months ago, but hasn’t heard much since then. b. GK: We keep looking at funders in the traditional tax credit view. There’s tons of dry capital looking to build housing, affordable and market rate, and workforce.

They need entitled projects, for pre-development phase to be done by city, local non-profits, whoever. That’s the message from OZ investors. (“Marketing package” to attract investors.)
c. SS: Cobbling together the resources that are available. Former redevelopment sites could be contributed. Fee waivers, HOME funds split with Apple Valley, former redevelopment funds, etc. Each one isn’t big, but combination can add up.

Once site is entitled, then can bring to state and leverage for bigger dollars. d. DY: Identify the sites where the City wants affordable housing. Create an RFP package. Typically, cities have land surplus list. Does Victorville not have such a list?
e. SW: We don’t. We have a group of properties that Successor Agency is trying to sell off, but don’t have a comprehensive list of properties to sell. Is one of major impediments that City doesn’t own specific lands?
f. DY: It’s definitely a lot easier to have land already owned by the City. Another resolution to consider: implement new zoning (affordable and inclusionary) into General Plan.
g. SW: Model city to refer to regarding inclusionary housing? h. DY: Work with the City of Palm Desert. Martin Alvarez is the ED Director. I can forward his information.
i. SS: For us, it’s not necessarily easier. It could make it more difficult. Would rather buy land on the market, then come to the City to get a residual receipts loan.

That’s more streamlined than working out a DDA. Given Victorville’s resources, would ask for land because City doesn’t have cash. Many cities seem to have departments with excess land. Or schools, or parking lots that are no longer needed.

7. SW: Why hasn’t Victorville seen a sizable multifamily project in the last 5 years? a. SS: First thing to mind – dissolution of RDAs took away capital. b. Attendee #1: Fees have a lot to do with it as well. City has gotten more stringent on what they are looking for. Current project – seems like City wants more like Irvine or Newport Beach-looking project. Also, if High Desert could do something about the Cajon Pass – it’s such a disaster and has gotten worse since changes were made to it. (Project is on Seneca and Cahuenga, Seneca Villas. Next door is 100% low income project. We’re working on trying to offer 20% low income.) c. GK: Need better regional collaboration among cities in High Desert. Bring in resource / development center. Many examples around the country of areas that 162
are doing something like that. Example: Paul Nolta from SBDC and I speak about creating a resource center. SB EDA and GO BIZ would back such an effort. d. DH: Good first step by merging the Chambers.
e. SW: Good point that there could be collaboration among cities, that this would help to pursue County and State funding. Are you finding that High Desert cities aren’t up to speed on resources available?
f. GK: Everybody has looked at Samson’s deal in Adelanto at relocating (?). I spoke to GO BIZ and I-Bank about ways to structure regional collaboration in the High Desert.
g. SS: There are COGs out there that are cobbling resources together for funding affordable housing. E.g., San Gabriel Valley COG. Gateway Cities COG is another one. COGs are pulling together resources for affordable housing, among doing many other things.
h. GK: WRCOG is another one. The form allows forming an EDC and applications for greater sources of funding.
i. HM: SGV has a Housing Trust that pursues LHTF funding. Member cities (there are 20) have allocated (a portion) of the PLHA grant funding.

8. Are you interested in potentially partnering with a church or religious institution for a project (per recently passed SB 899)? What could the City do to assist? a. DH: Riverside is having success with transitional housing on church property. b. SS: Experience has been that churches are not that different from market-rate owner / not that beneficial.
c. DY: Working on two projects partnering with churches, in which they get part of the developer fee. But not using bill.

9. Final Comments:
a. Attendee #1: Need about 8,200 units, right? (About that, yes.) Gil, are some of the funding sources you referenced only for 100% affordable projects? b. GK: EDC is an economic development corporation that could provide funding for different types of projects, not just housing.
c. Main message: creating joint powers / regional collaboration should focus on bringing in more CDFI, CDE, small business investment corporation, etc. into High Desert.
d. Attendee #1: Have you determined amounts of VL, L, and moderate? e. SW: Yes, that’s determined by SCAG.
f. HM: Workshop on 03/15, Planning Commission meeting to go over potential sites and proposed goals. Will also present results from survey with 100+ responses.

We encourage you to participate. Thank you for your time. g. SW: Echo Hitta’s comments.
163
HOUSING DEVELOPER STRATEGY SESSION #2
(MARCH 10, 2021)
• Notes

164

VICTORVILLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE

HOUSING DEVELOPER STRATEGY SESSION #2 NOTES

March 10, 2021 @ 1:00 PM

Meeting Notes

Attendees:

1. Attendee #1

2. City Staff #1

3. Consultant #1

4. Consultant #2

Notes

1. What are some challenges and opportunities you face as a developer while trying to develop housing / affordable housing in a community like Victorville? a. Attendee #1: Works for a large affordable housing developer in Lancaster (11 hundred units) also developed the downtown area.
i. Mostly comes down to finances for developers. Gap identified with credits and bonds. She does think there are opportunities in Victorville with the city-owned parcels.
ii. Parking is a huge issue in LA communities – skyrockets the price. Parking on grade is attractive.
iii. Also attractive to go into a community that wants to build affordable.

Developers should be strong on their own to outreach into the community on their own.

2. Have you encountered any programs, procedures, or incentives in other cities that have significantly facilitated housing development?
a. Consultant #1: Clarifying question – what are the densities that you’ve looked at in Lancaster that have made the deal work. Victorville already has some areas where the densities go up.
b. Attendee #1: 40-60 minimum. Larger projects to be no more than 120 units/acre (?). Affordable housing overlay that allows even more for folks that are going to build affordable housing.
c. Consultant #1: Do you believe that if they zone it and provide that, they will come?
d. Attendee #1: Yes because it’s always a bout making it pencil to fill the gap identified. I think how cities view their successor properties is important. There are opportunities to stimulate the economy while taking care of their homeless. 165
(i.e. $600 a month on SSI money, that’s a walking $600). Everyone who is experiencing homelessness can qualify for the $600 a month. i. I understand that we have to be fair and offer everyone a chance. Scoring transparency in scoring is very important.
ii. Public/private partnerships – ground lease, development fees, subsidy overlays. Making private money move faster
e. Consultant #1: Can you give us an example of a project that was successful? f. Attendee #1: City of LA – City-owned property – unsubordinated ground lease – 40 units of crate modular product. The developer is getting some operating subsidy. That’s a public/private partnership
i. There have been other creative partnerships like fly-away homes (private developer that builds for homeless). Have taken private money, given them a modest return and had to get buy-in from the city. ii. Modular offsets prevalent wages
g. City Staff #1: The city does not have opposition to modular construction as long as it does not just look like storage
i. Prevalent wages do not kick in until something is being built.

3. As funding for affordable housing is severely limited, what types of things can the City do to incentivize affordable housing projects (e.g., zoning, fee deferrals, streamlining, etc.)? a. Attendee #1: If there is a way for Victorville to be innovative to allow private developers to build affordable housing, but give them some sort of advantage – that would be attractive to come out to Victorville. (i.e. higher densities so they can pencil
i. Three streams, Capital A, private with a subsidy overlay, affordable tax credit, private but they’re doing the “missing middle” or workforce.

Workforce housing would be market.

4. Have you considered a project in Victorville or the High Desert area within the last 3 years? Why or why not?
a. Attendee #1: She has personally brought multiple developers (Capital A developer, private money but only want to do affordable) that want to come to areas like Victorville to build affordable. Looking for incentives like waived fees, higher density, leasing land for a dollar a year or donating it. i. If you have a mix of these folks, you can really get it going (private and credit guys). One private developer is looking to have a collective bargaining agreement. Everyone agrees to reduce their rates to build affordable housing.
b. Consultant #1: What about working with a habitat for humanity. 166
c. Attendee #1: She does not think that the volunteer work pool is sufficient to build affordable housing. Still thinks it’s good for single family and thinks the city should have a consistent stream of them.
i. ADU can impact homelessness and really add units and keep people living in place longer.
d. City Staff #1: they do have an ADU ordinance but does not go over the state one.

They adopted the state ordinance.
e. Attendee #1: San Jose has an innovative ADU program. The city would fund the construction as long as they agree to have a Section 8 tenant for 15 years. f. Consultant #1: Pasadena has a program where the city will waive a large portion of it if they agree to provide income documentation that shows they are restricted to affordable families.

5. In your opinion, what are some creative housing solutions that would help a city like Victorville develop more housing / affordable housing?
a. Attendee #1: She works in modular and thinks that they can help affordable housing because of the timeline. Her company is an innovative building company.

6. Are you interested in potentially partnering with a church or religious institution for a project (per recently passed SB 899)? What could the City do to assist? a. Attendee #1: They are involved with a group called YIGBY in San Diego. They are leveraging church property for affordable housing. Leaning on the religious land act. Just spoke to an NPO that is a former affordable developer that is exclusively working with religious organizations and doesn’t work with credits anymore.
b. Consultant #1: For city staff, it is a hard thing to become a broker for developer. It is nice to have organizations that are proactive and creative. It would be good to have some interest

7. Final Comments:
a. Attendee #1: Keep in mind that there are private developers who want to build affordable housing. They are talking about starting an organization like SCANPH (SCANPH is only for the credit and affordable folks)
i. It’s all about the subsidy overlay. If there is a way to lean on your county and get some vouchers, that would be great.
ii. Can they get a workforce vouchers, how can they get an allocation of VASH vouchers that are Victorville-specific.
iii. 80-100% is a section that really needs housing. Doing covenants for a certain amount of time. Make it attractive so private money can work. iv. Come see our factory in Carson – socially-distanced tours. Offer is on the table.
b. City Staff #1: He would personally like her to provide feedback on their land use element.
167
HOUSING DEVELOPER STRATEGY SESSION #3
(MARCH 10, 2021)
• Notes

168

VICTORVILLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE

HOUSING DEVELOPER STRATEGY SESSION #3 NOTES

March 10, 2021 @ 3:00 PM

Meeting Notes

Attendees:

1. Attendee #1

2. Attendee #2

3. Attendee #3

4. City Staff #1

5. Consultant #1

6. Consultant #2

Notes

1. Introductions
a. Attendee #2: Looking to create opportunities to create affordable housing. Gil in San Bernardino introduced him to Victorville. Knows the owner of the Green tree Inn.
b. Attendee #3: Strategic Development – was at META housing before. A lot of experience in LIHTC.
c. Attendee #1: Senior Project Manager at Strategic Development – Also worked with META Housing. Wants to participate in the Victorville affordable housing.

Has worked on a Victorville homeless shelter.

2. What are some challenges and opportunities you face as a developer while trying to develop housing / affordable housing in a community like Victorville? a. Challenge - Low Rents
i. Attendee #2: Although rents are an issue across the country, they are especially challenging in areas like the High Desert because they are significantly lower. Such low rates mean that they cannot generate enough profit to make it pencil.
ii. Attendee #3: A one-bedroom unit in the IE would rent at around $1,400 per month, while a one-bedroom unit in LA is $2100. That difference can generate a multi-million dollar gap.

1. He tried to work on a project in Hesperia (homeless veteran’s project). Numbers actually worked with vouchers. That is one of the best ways to make a project pencil.
b. Challenge - Impact Fees
i. Attendee #3: Impact fees are also a major hurdle – LA cities average $20,000 per unit, while some areas in the Inland Empire can have fees at the $30,000 level. This results in a lot more in additional expenses. c. Opportunity - Land
i. Attendee #3: One advantage the High desert has is a lot of available land. 169

3. Are there any constraints with obtaining loans (construction and/or permanent) for a project in Victorville?
a. TCAC Program is Competitive
i. Attendee #3: Overall, TCAC program has gotten a lot more competitive – many developers applying. First round of TCAC applications had a 28% win rate (for the $500 million state credit round). It’s not just Victorville, but particularly in places with lower rents, it is harder to be competitive and make things pencil. TCAC regulations have changed in the last six months (the less credits you ask for and the more units you build, the better your tiebreaker score is).

4. As funding for affordable housing is severely limited, what types of things can the City do to incentivize affordable housing projects (e.g., zoning, fee deferrals, streamlining, etc.)? a. Attendee #3: If Victorville helped expedite the affordable entitlement process, that would help. For instance, Los Angeles has an expedition process in TOT areas.

The quicker they can get through he entitlement process and approval, the easier it is for them to apply for funding.
i. Also, getting inspectors to give more attention to show up on time would help. Affordable requirements have hard deadlines and it helps to have them be prioritized. Missing deadlines can push them back a year or two. ii. City Council Support – Some projects have a special needs component, which can be sensitive to the community. A lot of state funding (like MHP, No Place Like Home, etc.) are tied to helping the most vulnerable. To be able to stand by the project, the community can be split on that, but having the council’s support is really important.
b. Attendee #3: What has worked in affordable housing projects in Victorville? c. City Staff #1: Most of them were probably built using Redevelopment funds that helped them pencil. Aside from that, we have not really been able to build more.

We are trying to change the tide with this new Housing Element. d. Attendee #3: Have there been any RFPs for any excess land in Victorville? e. City Staff #1: Our ED department is working on getting an RFP out for Housing Successor properties in Old Town. Hoping it goes out shortly. It is not a lot of property, but enough for a few projects.
f. Attendee #3: From a developer perspective, they would look at how large is the land – 3-4 acres is better than anything under 1. Being able to provide parking on grade would cut costs – podium and subterranean cost a lot. Location on areas with infrastructure helps a lot too. Anywhere in the middle of nowhere can be very expensive.
i. They had a project in Palmdale that cost an additional 2.2 million just to add utilities.
ii. Zoning (being allowed to have more density) would help too. 35-40 units per acre would help a lot.
g. Consultant #2: For locations near a supermarkets/commercial, what would the density needed be?
h. Attendee #3: Locations near commercial centers help them with TCAC applications since they are close to commercial centers (more points). 30- 50maximum would work. Important to not set minimums, as it can make it difficult 170
to meet the requirements if the acreage is low. Better to set maximum and let them go lower if they choose. Density bonuses would also be a good consideration.
i. Consultant #2: Old Town Area has a few vacant lots where the city has had to demolish some buildings. There are vacant properties that have already been cleared up. They also have the needed density.
j. Attendee #2: When he figured out that he couldn’t make it work on one of the best pieces of land in Victorville, he realized the low rents were a huge deterrent. k. Attendee #3: Does the city have “soft funds” for affordable housing? Specifically project-based vouchers.
l. City Staff #1: We have some PLHA funds, HOME funds, and not sure if they have project-based vouchers. The City doesn’t, but they’d have to check if the County has it. Usually the Housing Authority have the vouchers. m. Consultant #2: We looked at vouchers for another client. Cities that don’t have a lot of staff are challenged because it is a lot of work to administer it. n. Attendee #2: Organizations like the United Way – they have access to tenant- based vouchers. Master lease and HUD will underwrite if there are vouchers. If they designate a number of units for homelessness, then they can do a master lease with them.
o. Consultant #2: City applied for the PLHA grant. Money is starting to come in for pre-development and development. We are starting to see actual money for developments. Additionally, the City can have more control over where to modify zoning for these types of projects to help provide land where developers can get more points for their location.
p. Attendee #3: Being in a QCT (qualified census tract) or a DDA (places that are very expensive) gives points and being close to amenities, helps provide more points. Looked at the HUD website to check if there are any QCT (huduser.gov/portal/sadda/sadda_qct.html)
q. Attendee #1: They are looking at a few things as the opportunities come up.

Something Victorville can do to expedite the entitlements. i. If the City sticks to the timeline predictions they make, it would be really helpful. Additionally, making the city more development friendly. r. Consultant #2: What would be ideal turnaround for entitlements? s. Attendee #1: 4-6 months. But a key element is being able to stick to the predictions made.
i. What is the process to do a zone change?
t. City Staff #1: It would take an ordinance – take it to council – do an environmental review, etc. Environmental is typically something that takes a while. They try to do it as quickly as they can, but developers tend to throw the towel in when they see all the environmental processes because they have a lot of Joshua Trees (protected).

5. Have you considered a project in Victorville or the High Desert area within the last 3 years? Why or why not?
a. Green Tree Hotel
i. Attendee #2: Large plot of land that the seller has been wanting to develop. The hotel is a gateway to the city and has golf course views that would be great for affordable housing. Seller is willing to provide the land for affordable housing and even then, it’s hard to make it pencil because of the rents. They need something else to make the deal work (vouchers). 171
ii. City Staff #1: Green Tree Inn is along the 7th street corridor. Any luck with trying to make the project pencil?
iii. Attendee #2: it’s so disappointing. The program never really launched – first two years had a lot of requirements, then COVID hit.

1. They can come back to Scott and tell him what they would need the zoning to be for the Green tree to make it pencil. (Per Scott, it’s the right time to do this because we are updating the land use element).
172
HOUSING DEVELOPER STRATEGY SESSION #4
(MARCH 12, 2021)
• Notes

173

VICTORVILLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE

HOUSING DEVELOPER STRATEGY SESSION #4 NOTES

March 12, 2021 @ 2:00 PM

Meeting Notes

Attendees:

1. Attendee #1

2. Attendee #2

3. Attendee #3

4. City Staff #1

5. Consultant #1

6. Consultant #2

Notes

1. What are some challenges and opportunities you face as a developer while trying to develop housing / affordable housing in a community like Victorville? a. Attendee #3: Can’t get rents to cover costs of construction. Land residual result in negative amounts. Fees are high. Have asked Sophie Smith and staff to review fees. Couple of apartment developers are trying to develop; question is whether they will be able to get the rents to justify the costs, including CA requirements (CEQA, etc.). We battle over these issues. Some say there’s no choice. We don’t have an affordable issue here. We could use more housing.

About 57% of the High Desert is on welfare or some kind of subsidy. Building to that market is not where we should be building. We should encourage people to get a job or get an education / trade and get in the workforce. b. Attendee #1: I do see an affordable housing issue. What I can afford may not be what you can afford. We are still in the midst of a pandemic. We have people who were laid off, did not choose not to work. We are trying to keep people housed. We have opened up shared housing to keep people off the street. I went through the struggle of becoming homeless, not because of lack of work or education, but because of divorce / abusive husband. Moved and worked in Irvine for a time, because wages in High Desert don’t meet needs of large family.

Now in a pandemic, with businesses closing, we need to look at how to help people who aren’t choosing to be on public assistance.
c. Attendee #2: Construction costs are high right now. Way affordable housing works is affordable rents. Doesn’t generate classic rent-cost structure. Need additional subsidy / residual loans, either from City (or fee waivers) or working with County or State. Biggest hurdle is funding and how long it takes to get funding. Jamboree was fortunate to celebrate 31 years this year. Step that takes the longest is financing process. Most programs are 2-5 times oversubscribed.

We have to be persistent to go after funding multiple times. If it’s not publicly owned land, need private owner to give time to get through that process. Most owners are not willing to do that. Need time and capital for these deals, which sometimes have 5-7 layers.
174
d. Attendee #2: Would like to restart conversation about project in Victorville. Did a lot of land planning, working architects, etc. It’s been about a year since last speaking about a prior project. The property was City-owned / controlled. e. Attendee #1: Have you heard anything about Housing Trust Fund that Riverside put together?
f. City Staff #1: Hitta and I have talked about that. It could be something that we focus on as a policy objective in the Housing Element.
g. Consultant #1: Roger, without the land being provided for the project, the numbers didn’t work, is that correct?
h. Attendee #2: The project got stalled in the use of the mixed use space. Jamboree wanted community-serving purpose. City wanted retail (e.g., Starbucks). The City’s idea was to rejuvenate Old Town. It’s not quite there. Rather than have empty space, we wanted to include community-serving use, to activate the community that way, then convert to retail at a later point. i. Attendee #3: We have sold and leased more space in Old Town than anyone else in the time we’ve been there. Our company has made a decision that we won’t take on any time of commercial land use on properties north of the Fairgrounds now, because of safety. At any time of the day, downtown doesn’t feel safe. It’s going to take a very serious commitment from the City and the Sheriff to clean up the downtown area. The homeless issue and crime have taken over so bad. That’s sad, because we like to service the entire region. j. City Staff #1: Roger brought up a good point about how zoning can become an impediment to making development work. It’s about finding that middle ground to allow flexible community space. I thought we got there. But there was a factor in making it easier for someone to build a development. We don’t have many developers who specialize in mixed use. They build it for an affordable housing complex. It becomes a hurdle when there’s not demand for commercial in that area. The current state of Old Town is unfortunate. Harris & Associates is helping to form a CRIA, to get tax increment to supplement a development and pay for the commercial component.
k. Attendee #2: There wasn’t an issue about paying for it. It was about the use of the space.
l. Consultant #1: In addition to the HE update, the City is updating the LUE. Retail can be tricky because demand changes (re: e-commerce). Even market rate projects with first floor retail can struggle to keep tenants in the first floor. That’s been a relatively newer phenomenon. As retail preferences change, retail evolves so quickly. The LUE is also being updated. Perhaps there’s an opportunity to look at the zoning requirement in the Old Town area. Are there any constraints with obtaining loans (construction and/or permanent) for a project in Victorville?

2. Have you encountered any programs, procedures, or incentives in other cities that have significantly facilitated housing development?
175
a. Attendee #3: I don’t think we have an issue with affordable housing in the VV. A dollar goes farther here than anywhere else in So Cal. We don’t have an affordable housing problem. Angela Valles was voted on Council because she said there were too many affordable housing built. We need to get more people who are sitting at home to go to school and create a skill. You can’t grow an economic when you don’t have people working. I’ve talked to some homeless people. Some of them don’t want housing; they want to remain homeless. b. Consultant #1: Clarified that City has to plan for affordable housing, per State law (RHNA).
c. Attendee #3: I understand that. The first project I sold in Santa Barbara was an affordable housing project.
d. Attendee #2: Works well when department within the City are well coordinated and there’s a consistent mission, driving for development. Good coordination improves the timeline. E.g., including fire department. When a HE is thoughtful.

E.g., Pasadena 2016 [2014/] HE, won an award. They not only identified sites, but also categorized them for probability of development. For tax credit purposes, sites have to be near amenities. If low probability of development, have to identify more or other sites.
e. Attendee #1: I liked the example of the Jamboree project in Victorville that have services co-located with affordable housing. It’s critical that services are partnered with affordable housing. I’m very interested in what Riverside did with starting a Housing Trust, to make sure the entire community is a part of building affordable housing.
f. Attendee #2: Fee waiver or deferral would be helpful to reduce the capital stack needed for affordable housing.
g. City Staff #1: How much deferral?
h. Attendee #2: E.g., 15-year deferral, in the form of a Note.

3. In your opinion, what are some creative housing solutions that would help a city like Victorville develop more housing / affordable housing?
a. Attendee #2: ADUs have been successful for some cities. It’s a one-off, but a form of affordable housing that can be quickly built and is built by the private sector. We’re interested in doing modular, but haven’t seen it done locally. For us, the benefit of modular is time savings, not cost. We’re trying to find energy efficiencies as well. We’re still doing the old-fashioned builds. We’re not convinced that shipping containers have been more cost effective. We’ve seen them be more expensive.
b. Attendee #1: Tiny homes will help address homelessness. Largest concern is making sure they have kitchens and restrooms so they don’t have to wander to use the restroom. If 60% of people are on welfare, that has to be part of the answer.
176
c. Attendee #3: Not aware of success of Tiny Homes. Lizette Gallo (sp?) has been a proponent of them. If they are clustered well and landscaped appropriately, maybe they can work. Haven’t seen them work in more inland areas, but am interested and would like to see more information about them.

4. Are you interested in potentially partnering with a church or religious institution for a project (per recently passed SB 899)? What could the City do to assist? a. Attendee #2: Jamboree has done it in Orange County. Some congregations have shrunk and have land available. Jamboree did a ground lease on a church property to benefit the church and provide affordable housing. Many times, the matter is about getting the regional entity to get in line with the local church. b. Attendee #1: Am a pastor in the High Desert. Part of that goes along with the mission of the church – providing housing, addressing the needs of the homeless. It goes hand in hand, working with the churches to reduce the parking requirements to ensure there’s adequate property. I like that idea. c. Attendee #3: We get 3 calls a week where people want to create or expand a church. I don’t see this being viable in Victorville, where there’s already so much land available. The largest church in SB County is the High Desert Church, and they are impacted in their ability to grow. I’m not aware of churches in High Desert that aren’t growing / have excess land. I could see it work in Orange County (but not the High Desert).

5. Final Comments:
a. Attendee #3: Challenge from the builders – some of them can absorb the increased requirements of design, block walls, etc. that City is trying to apply.

Scott and his staff understand there are problems that have existed for a long time. But when builders say they don’t want to go there due to higher costs… Now there’s a push for housing across the State, but new home building is down in High Desert. Deferred fees are helpful. Won’t disagree with the State. It’s run very poorly. Unlike in other places in CA, in High Desert, we need quality jobs. I’d like to see more, higher end housing. We also need to satisfy the needs of all the players. Scott is very cognizant about the issues. Developers don’t want to go to Cities with divided leadership.
b. Attendee #1: Have been working closely with the City, about the last 3 years.

Have been up here since 1989. Want to commend the City for the work they are doing. They are doing an awesome job, assessing the community, identifying and addressing the needs. I appreciate being in the City more than ever. 177
COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #2 (MARCH 15, 2021)
• Notices
• Stakeholder List
• Social Media
• Agenda
• Presentation
• Zoom Chat
• Meeting Notes
• Archived Meeting Items

178
Community Workshop #2 (March 15, 2021)
Notices

179
City Calendar Workshop Announcement:

https://www.victorvilleca.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/851/728?curm=3&cury=2021

180
City News Article Workshop Announcement:

https://www.victorvilleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/725/16 181
City of Victorville - Bulletin Detail Report
Subject: Victorville Planning Commission Will Host 2nd Workshop to Discuss City's Housing Needs
Sent: 03/09/2021 08:08 AM PST
Sent By: [email protected]
Sent T o: Subscribers of CDBG, General Plan Update, Planning Commission, or Press Release,
1,636
Recipients
Email
SMS
Facebook
T witter
RSS
98%
Delivered
0% Pending
2% Bounced
32% Open Rate
1% Click Rate
Minutes Cumulative
Attempted
3 99%
5 99%
10 99%
30 99%
60 99%
120 99%
Email Delivery Stats
1,636 T otal Sent
1,609 (98%) Delivered
0 (0%) Pending
27 (2%) Bounced
3 (0%) Unsubscribed
Delivery Metrics - Details
881 T otal Opens
498 (32%) Unique Opens
32 T otal Clicks
17 (1%) Unique Clicks
11 # of Links
Bulletin Analytics
182
These figures represent all data since the bulletin was first sent to present time.

Progress % Delivered Recipients # Delivered Opened Unique Bounced/Failed Unsubscribes Email Bulletin Delivered 98.4% 1,595 1,569 498 / 31.7% 26 3 Digest n/a n/a 0 0 0 / 0.0% 0 0
SMS Message Delivered 97.6% 41 40 n/a 1 n/a
Delivery and performance
Link URL Unique
Clicks
Total
Clicks
https://victorvilleca-gov.zoom.us/j/91481107090?pwd=TUQ3… 10 19 https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/agendas?utm_me… 3 9 https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/CAVICTORVILLE/sub… 3 3 https://twitter.com/cityofvv?utm_medium=email&utm_sourc… 1 1 https://www.facebook.com/CityOfVictorville/?utm_medium=e… 0 0 https://www.instagram.com/cityofvv/?utm_medium=email&u… 0 0 https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/CAVICTORVILLE/sub… 0 0 https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/CAVICTORVILLE/bu… 0 0 https://vimeo.com/victorville?utm_medium=email&utm_sour… 0 0 https://subscriberhelp.granicus.com/?utm_medium=email&u… 0 0 https://subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com/ 0 0
183

14343 Civic Drive
P.O. Box 5001
Victorville, California 92393-5001
760.955.5000

CITY OF

VICTORVILLE

Sue Jones, Public Information Officer
(760) 955-5028 (Office)
(760) 953-6940 (Cell)
[email protected]
Event Announcement

VICTORVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL HOST

WORKSHO
P TO DISCUSS CITY’S HOUSING NEEDS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 4, 2021
VICTORVILLE, Calif. – On March 15 at 5 p.m., the Victorville Planning Commission will host a public workshop to discuss future housing planning in Victorville for the City’s General Plan Update. This workshop will discuss the Community Survey results, consider possible locations for future housing and obtain feedback on goals. Community members are invited to participate in the workshop that will be hosted via Zoom.

Zoom Meeting Details:

Link to Zoom Meeting: vv.city/generalplanmtg
Meeting ID: 914 8110 7090
Meeting Passcode: VV123
Phone Number for Audio: (669) 900-9128
*The workshop agenda will be available at VictorvilleCA.gov/agendas at 3 p.m. on March 11.

The City of Victorville is in the process of updating its General Plan, which is used by the City to plan for future growth and change in Victorville. In addition to planning for future housing needs, the City will be updating General Plan chapters related to land use and safety and creating a new chapter on Environmental Justice.

Questions about the housing workshop and the City’s General Plan Update can be directed to (760) 955-5135.
# # #
184

14343 Civic Drive
P.O. Box 5001
Victorville, California 92393-5001
760.955.5000

CITY OF

VICTORVILLE

Sue Jones, Oficial de Información Publica
(760) 955-5028 (Oficina)
(760) 953-6940 (Móvil)
[email protected]
Anuncio de Evento

LA COMISIÓN DE PLANIFICACIÓN DE VICTORVILLE INSTALARÁ UN TALLER

PARA DISCUTIR LAS NECESIDADES DE VIVIENDA DE LA
CIUDAD
PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA: 4 de marzo de 2021
VICTORVILLE, Calif. – En el 15 de marzo a las 5 p.m., la Comisión de Planificación de Victorville organizará un taller público para discutir el futuro de la planeación de vivienda en Victorville para la Actualización del Plan General de la Ciudad. El taller discutirá los resultados de la Encuesta Comunitaria, considerará posibles ubicaciones para viviendas futuras, y obtendrá comentarios sobre los objetivos. Los miembros de la comunidad están invitados a participar en este taller que se realizara a través de Zoom.

Detalles de la reunión de Zoom:

Enlace a la reunión de Zoom: vv.city/generalplanmtg
ID de la reunión: 914 8110 7090
Código de acceso a la reunión: VV123
Número de teléfono para el audio: (669) 900-9128
*La agenda del taller estará disponible en VictorvilleCA.gov/agendas a las 3 p.m. el 11 de marzo.

La Ciudad de Victorville está en proceso de actualizar su Plan General, que es utilizado por la Ciudad para planificar el futuro crecimiento y cambio en Victorville. Además de planificar las necesidades futuras de vivienda, la Ciudad actualizara los capítulos del Plan General relacionados con el uso del suelo y la seguridad y creara un nuevo capítulo sobre Justicia Ambiental.

Las preguntas sobre el taller de vivienda y la Actualización del Plan General del a Ciudad pueden dirigirse al (760) 955-5135.
# # #
185

14343 Civic Drive
P.O. Box 5001
Victorville, California 92393-5001
760.955.5000

CITY OF

VICTORVILLE

VICTORVILLE

PLANNIN
G

COMMISSION

WILL HOST ITS

SECOND VIRTUAL

WORKSHOP TO

DISCUSS THE
CITY’S HOUSING
NEEDS

VICTORVILLE, Calif. – On
March 15 at 5 p.m., the Victorville Planning Commission will host the second of two public workshops to discuss future housing planning in Victorville for the City’s General Plan Update. This worksho
p will discuss the Community Survey results, consider possible locations for future housing and obtain input on goals Community members are invited to participate in this workshop that will be hosted via Zoom.

Zoom Meeting Details:

Link: vv.city/generalplanmtg Meeting ID: 914 8110 7090 Passc ode: VV123 Call In Number: (669) 900-9128

*The workshop agenda will be available at Victorv illeCA.gov/agendas at 3 p.m. on March 11th.* We want to hear what is important to you! Comments and questions are always welcome. If you do not plan to attend the Planning Commission meeting, please email your comments prior to the meeting to [email protected] . Include “General Plan Update” in the subject line of you r email.

Check www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate for updat es, upcoming meeting schedules, links to surveys & more.

For questions about the housing workshop and the City’s General Plan Update please call the Planning Departm
ent at (760) 955-5135.
186

14343 Civic Drive
P.O. Box 5001
Victorville, California 92393-5001
760.955.5000

CITY OF

VICTORVILLE

LA COMISIÓN DE

PLANIFI
CACIÓN

DE VICTORVILLE
ORGANIZARÁ SU

SEGUNDO TALLER

VIRTUAL PARA

DISCUTIR LAS

NECESIDADES DE

VIVIENDA DE LA
CIUDAD

VICTORVILLE, Calif. – El
15 de marzo a las 5 p.m., la Comisión de Planificación de Victorville organizará el segundo de dos talleres públicos para discutir el futuro de la planeación de vivienda en Victorville para la Actuali
zación del Plan General de la Ciudad. El taller discutirá los resultados de la Encuesta Comunitaria, considerará posibles ubicaciones para viviendas futuras, y obtendrá comentarios sobre los objetivos. Los miembro
s de la comunidad están invitados a participar en este taller que se realizará a través de Zoom.

Detalles de la reunión de Zoom:

Enlace: vv.city/generalplanmtg ID de la reunión: 914 8110 7090 Código de acceso: VV123 Numero de llam ada: (669) 900-9128

*La agen
da del taller estará disponible en VictorvilleCA.gov/agendas a la 3 p.m. el 11 de marzo.* ¡Queremos escuchar lo que es importante para usted! Los comentarios y preguntas son bien recibidos. Si no planea asistir al taller de la Comisión de Planificación, por favor envíe sus comentarios por correo electrónico a [email protected] antes de la junta. Incluya "Actualización del Plan General " en la línea de asunto
de su correo electrónico.

Visite www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate para obt ener actualizaciones, horarios de próximas reuniones, enlaces a encuestas y más.

Si tiene preguntas sobre el taller de vivienda y la Actualización del Plan General de la Ciudad, llame al Departa
mento de Planificación al (760) 955-5135.
187
Community Workshop #2 (March 15, 2021)
Stakeholder List
(Stakeholders contacted for Workshops #1 & #2)

188
Workshop #1 Workshop #2
Bamidbar Shei Ma'alah x
Burning Bush Church x
Victory Outreach Victorville x
New Destiny Church x
Unitarian-Universalist Society of the High Desert x
Gate of the Desert x
St. Joan of Arc-Catholic Church x
High Desert Church x
Golden Years Elderly Care Inc x
Gracelight Home Health x
MHS Helping Hands Kinship x
Impressions at Valley Center x
Northgate Village x x
Rodeo Drive Meadows x
Sherwood Villa Apartments x
Summer Breeze Apartments x
Newporter Apartments x
Department of Behavioral Health x
Mercy Housing x x
Jamboree Housing Corporation x x
Jamboree Housing Corporation x
Habitat for Humanity, Los Angeles x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Elementary School District x
Victor Valley Union High School District x
Victor Valley Union High School District x
Victor Valley Union High School District x
Victor Valley Union High School District x
Bradco - Joe Brady x x
High Desert Association of Realtors - Diana Carlton x x High Desert Association of Realtors - Don Brown x
Providence - Suzanne Schwab x x
Abundant Living Family Church x
Acore Solution x
TABLE A-1. LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS CONTACTED
189
Workshop #1 Workshop #2
Assistance League of Victor Valley x
Catholic Charities x
Cedar House x
Community Health Action Network x
Court Appointed Special Advocates of San Bernadino x
EAH Housing x
Family Assistance Program x x
Foothill AIDS Project x
Global Institute for Public Strategies x x
God's Hand Extended x
High Desert Community Foundation x
High Desert Homeless Services, Inc. x x
High Desert Second Chance x
High Desert Transitional Living Connection x
Housing for All Corporation x
Inland Empire United Way x
Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board x
Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino x
Lesly's CPR x
Millionaire Mind Kids x
National Community Renaissance x
Orenda Veterans Project x
Rolling Start x
Samaritan's Helping Hand x
St. Joan of Arc x x
St. John of God Health Care Services x
St. Joseph Health St. Mary x x
Victor Valley Community Services Council x
Victor Valley Family Resource Center x
Victor Valley Rescue Mission x x
Victorville Senior Citizens Club Inc. x
Voices for Immigrants x x
Wawela Cancer Support x
Women of Noble Character x
Burrtec Waste Industries x
County Service Area 64 x
Frontier California, Inc. x
Mojave Water Agency x
Southwest Gas Corporation x
Victor Elementary School District x
VV Union High School District x
Adelanto Elementary School District x
Hesperia Unified School District x
City of Adelanto x
Building Industries Association x x
190
Workshop #1 Workshop #2
Victorville Chamber of Commerce x
Caltrans x x
Department of Fish and Wildlife x
Flood Control District x
Mojave Desert AQMD x
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) x x
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) x VVTA x
Charles Speelman x
Claudia Harris x
Cynthia White x
Elaine Navarrete x x
HOPE Team x
LaRon Whitfield x
Margaret Diaz x x
Martha Powell x
Mike Catalano x x
Roger LaPlante x
Stacy DeVoll x
Susan Drake x x
Tanya Benitez x
Tony McCampbell x
Linda Ingle-Calloway x x
Alyce Belford x
Amber Allen x
Andrew Gruchy x
Christal Hampton x
Daniel Herrera Garcia x x
Delbert Stanley x x
Dr. Shawn Smith x x
Ernest Rios x
Gregory Lincoln x x
Inger Robertson x
Jackie Rocha x x
Jason Judkins x
Jennifer Neri x
John Simmons x
Karla Franko x
Laura Davis x
Lori Smith x x
Maria Razo x
Mike Jones x x
Regina Linares x x
Rene Keres x
Sergeant John Rodriguez x
191
Workshop #1 Workshop #2
Silvia I. Urenda x
Veronica Dugay x
Adam x
Anthony Kim x
Bob Shiota x
Brian Waterhouse x
Carl x x
Carlos Rodriguez x
Dan Tate x
Deputy Snyder x
Giselle x
Gordon - BIA x
Jane Warren x
Katherine Duncan x x
khanni krish x
Kim Sampson x
Leah Anderson x
Liz Hewson x
Martin Estacio x x
Ramiro Rodriguez x
Satcey x x
Susan Pierce x
Veronica Tavares x
VV Chamber x
William Hogan x x
Rob Kurth Contact x
192
Community Workshop #2 (March 15, 2021)
Social Media

193
Facebook (English & Spanish):
194
195

196
Instagram (English & Spanish):
197

198
Twitter (English & Spanish):

199

200
Community Workshop #2 (March 15, 2021)
Agenda

201
Zoom
Victorville, Ca.
www.victorvilleca.gov

PLANNING COMMISSION

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
MARCH 15, 2021 5:00 p.m. Special Meeting
The Victorville Planning Commission holds its business meetings in public in accordance with the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act, its established policies and procedures, and its adopted parliamentary authority. The Planning Commission strives to carry out its meetings in an atmosphere of professionalism with full participation by members of the body and the public.

Pursuant to Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 this meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconference and electronic means. Members of the public can observe the meeting using Zoom or YouTube.

To join via Computer, Laptop, or Smart Device:

Click the blue Zoom icon located on the City’s website at victorvilleca.gov/government/agendas or enter the following:

Meeting ID: 991 1575 7711
Passcode: VV123
*To provide comment, click the “Raise Hand” button and the Clerk will unmute you.

To join via Audio only (cell phone or landline):

Dial: (669) 900-9128
Meeting ID: 991 1575 7711
*To provide comment dial *9 to “Raise Hand”, dial *6 to “Unmute” when called upon.

Email: Members of the public may submit comments electronically to [email protected] until 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s office at (760) 955-5188 no later than 72 hours prior to the meeting.
202
5:00 P.M. Special Meeting
Zoom
Call to Order
Roll Call
Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
Special Orders of the Day Presentation

1. General Plan Workshop – Housing Element
Public Comments
Presentation of Reports by Commission Members and Staff Adjournment
203
Community Workshop #2 (March 15, 2021)
Presentation

204
If you wish to ask a
question or have a
comment
Si desea hacer alguna
pregunta o comentario,
haga clic en “Raise Hand”
para levantar la mano
1 To participate in the
workshop and respond
to the questions
Escriba en el chat para
participar en el taller con
preguntas y comentarios, y
responder preguntas
Select your preferred
listening language
(English or Spanish)
Haga clic en
“Interpretation” y
elija “Spanish”
205
February 24, 2021
City of Victorville
Housing Element Workshop #2
March 15, 2021
206
I. Welcome & Introductions
II. Background – State
Requirement
s
III. Survey Results
IV. Site Inventory
V. Proposed Housing Goals
VI. Wrap-Up
3 207
Introductions
City Staff:
 Scott Webb
 Michael Szarzynski
 Hitta Mosesm
an
 Dima Galkin
 Irlanda Martinez
4 208
Background-
State
Requirements
5 Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above-
moderate
Income
TOTAL
Number of
Units 1,735 1,136 1,504 3,790 8,165
209
Housing
Cost vs.

Income
Growth
(since 2018)
Median Home Prices
23%
Average Rent
20%
Median Household
Income (County)
15%
6 210
Housing/
Land Use
Survey
Results
7 211
Who
Responded
to the
Survey?
8 212
Why
Victorville?
9 Close to Family
Close to job
Quality of Housing
•
Cost (75%)
•
Low crime
•
Desirable neighborhood
Top 3 factors
213
Housing
Conditions
10 214
Housing
Needed
11 215
What
Housing
Types/
Locations?
12 Variety of Housing Types very important
Special Needs Housing very important
Single family most popular type
Housing near Recreation and Grocery Stores
Revitalize Underutilized Commercial/Industrial Properties 216
How to
Address
Issues?
13 City Working
with
Developers
Development
Incentives
Affordable
Housing
Homelessness
Solutions
217
What
Should the
City Focus
On? Incentives for affordable units
Promote mixed-use development
Rehabilitation of existing housing
Encourage innovative design and amenities
14 218
Housing
Strategies
15 Defer/Reduce/Waive
Fees
Allow for Residential
Zoning in
Commercial Areas
Encourage
Accessory Dwelling
Units
219
It’s Time to Take a Poll
Es Hora de Hacer Una Encuesta
16 220
 Do Results Accurately Represent
Housing Con
ditions/ Needs/
Preferences?
 ¿Representan los resultados las
precisas co
ndiciones / necesidades
/ preferencias de vivienda?
17 221
18 What is One Biggest
Housing Need in
Victorville?
More Single Family
Housing
More Single Family with
Smaller Lot Sizes
More apartments/condos
More affordable housing
¿Cuál es la mayor
necesidad de vivienda
en Victorville?
Más vivienda unifamiliar
Más vivienda unifamiliar
con lotes pequeños
Más apartamentos /
condominios
Más vivienda asequible
222
19 What kind of housing do
you want to see that is not
(sufficiently) available in
Victorville?
Single Family Detached
Homes
Condos/Townhomes
Apartments
Affordable Housing (any
kind)
¿Qué tipo de vivienda desea
ver que no esté
(suficientemente)
disponible en Victorville?
Viviendas unifamiliares
independientes
Condominios
Apartamentos
Vivienda asequible (de
cualquier tipo
223
Site
Inventory
 Required by State Law
 List in Housing Element
 Identify specific properties
 Estimated # Units
 Level of Affordability
 Zoning (how many units)
20 224
21 Currently Zoned – Market Rate Single Family
225
22 Currently Zoned – Market Rate Multi-Family
226
23 Currently Zoned – Higher Density/Affordable
Old T own Area
227
24 Currently Zoned – Higher Density/Affordable
Civic Center Area
228
Opportunity
Areas
25 229
26 Potential Land Use Changes – Higher Density/ Affordable – 7th Street Corridor
230
27 Potential Land Use Changes – Higher Density/ Affordable – West of Dunia
231
28 Potential Land Use Changes – Higher Density/ Affordable – St.

Mary’s Campus
232
29 Potential Land Use Changes – Higher Density/ Affordable – South of Nisqualli
233
30 Potential Land Use Changes – Higher Density/ Affordable –Walmart Supercenter
234
31 Potential Land Use Changes – Higher Density/ Affordable – Desert Valley Hospital
235
What Do Y ou Think?
¿Qué piensa?
32 236
33 What Area Needs Affordable
Apartments Most?
• Old Town
• Civic Center
• 7th St. Corridor
• Near Victorville Mall/Dunia
Plaza
• South of Nisqualli
• Near St. Mary’s Campus
• Near Walmart Center
• Near Desert Valley Hospital
¿Dónde se necesitan más
apartamentos asequibles?
• Old Town
• Civic Center
• Corredor de la Calle 7
• Cerca del Victorville Mall /
Plaza Dunia
• Sur de la carretera Nisqualli
• Cerca del campus de St.

Mary’s
• Cerca del Walmart Center
• Cerca del Hospital Desert
Valley
237
34 What Area Needs Market
Rate Units Most?
• Old Town
• Civic Center
• 7th St. Corridor
• Near Victorville Mall/Dunia
Plaza
• South of Nisqualli
• Near St. Mary’s Campus
• Near Walmart Center
• Near Desert Valley Hospital
¿Dónde se necesitan más
unidades a precio de
mercado?
• Old Town
• Civic Center
• Corredor de la Calle 7
• Cerca del Victorville Mall /
Plaza Dunia
• Sur de la carretera Nisqualli
• Cerca del campus de St.

Mary’s
• Cerca del Walmart Center
• Cerca del Hospital Desert
Valley
238
35 239
If you wish to ask a
question or have a
comment
Si desea hacer alguna
pregunta o comentario,
haga clic en “Raise Hand”
para levantar la mano
36 To participate in the
workshop and respond
to the questions
Escriba en el chat para
participar en el taller con
preguntas y comentarios, y
responder preguntas
Select your preferred
listening language
(English or Spanish)
Haga clic en
“Interpretation” y
elija “Spanish”
240

PROPOSED

HOUSING

ELEMENT
GOALS
37 241
Goal #1
Encourage
Development of
Housing Types to
Meet Variety of
Incomes
38 242
Examples of Different
Housing Types
39 243
Single Family
40 244
Alternatives
to Single
Family
41 Condominiums
Townhomes
245
Apartments
42 246
43 247
44 How Can the City Encourage Variety of Housing
Types?
• Work with developers
• Change development standards
• Accessory Dwelling Units
• Other
¿Cómo puede la ciudad fomentar la variedad de tipos
de vivienda?
• Trabajar con desarrolladores
• Cambiar los estándares de desarrollo
• Unidades de vivienda accesorias
• Otro
248
Goal #2
Encourage
Home-
Ownership
45 249
46 250
47 What is the biggest
challenge for residents to
become homeowners?
• Down payment
• Monthly payment
• Maintenance and repair
costs
• Personal / lifestyle
preferences (prefer to rent)
• Other
¿Cuál es el mayor desafío
para que los residentes se
conviertan en propietarios
de viviendas?
• Depósito
• Mensualidad
• Costos de mantenimiento y
reparación.
• Preferencias personales / de
estilo de vida (prefiero
alquilar)
• Otro
251
Goal #3
Encourage
More
Affordable
Housing
48 252
49 253
50 What affordable housing types are needed?
• Apartments?
• Condos/Townhomes?
• Accessory Dwelling Units?
¿Qué tipos de viviendas asequibles se
necesitan?
• Apartamentos
• Condominios
• Unidades de vivienda accessoria
254
Goal #4
Maximize
Solutions for
Those
Experiencing
Homelessness
51 255
52 256
53 Other
Input on
Goals?
(Please
respond in
the chat)
Different Housing Types
Homeownership
Affordable Housing
Homelessness Solutions
¿Otro
aporte
sobre las
metas?
(Responda
en el chat)
Diferentes tipos de viviendas
Propiedad de vivienda
Vivienda asequible
Soluciones para personas sin hogar
257
What Do
Y ou Think?
54 What other housing goals would
you like to see the City establish?
• Type in the chat
¿Qué otros objetivos de vivienda le
gustaría que la Ciudad estableciera?
• Escriba en el chat
258
More
Opportunities
for
Involvement &
Input
55 • Planning Commission Hearing:

Wednesday, May 12, 2021
Draft
Housing
Element:
• 2nd Land Use Element Workshop:

Wednesday, May 26, 2021
Attend a
Workshop:
• Safety / Environmental Justice
Elements
• Please visit:
http://vv.city/gpsurveys
Take the
Survey:
259
Questions &
Feedback
56 260
Thank you!
Scott Webb
City Planner
(760) 955-5135
[email protected]
Questions? Comments?
Please email:
[email protected]
Visit the City’s website:
http://www.victorvilleca.gov/generalplanupdate
57 261
Community Workshop #2 (March 15, 2021)
Zoom Chat

262
17:21:13 From Sandie : However, there were only 106 people... 17:21:33 From Sandie : that responded
17:21:38 From trobi : In the context of very affordable housing, does the city ha
ve any position on tiny homes perhaps on leased land?
17:22:46 From Rasiene's Galaxy Note20 5G : Yes, my question too. How is the city fe
eling or climate in the city in regards to tiny homes?
17:23:32 From ms Gomez : inclusion zoning is important 17:24:14 From M Vaitai : What are the restrictions with ADU’s in the city? 17:33:46 From M Vaitai : Are these maps available to view online? 17:35:30 From trobi : what did the numbers refer to on the purple areas? 17:39:14 From Larry : There is already a development i n progress at Pacoima
and BVR. Should be upon very very soon
17:41:45 From Larry : sorry for the typing. On my cell phone and using voice t
o text.
17:43:38 From Larry : It is a commercial develpment
17:43:45 From ED Alex Byron : It's a car wash
17:43:45 From Manuel Mancha : doesn't housing cause a drain on services to the cit
y?
17:44:12 From ms Gomez : We have observed several maps for opportunities for apa
rtments or single family or condos and what no. However although there are state mandates where does the city's local control exercise one of several areas for state compliance and who is the oversight board in this matter? 17:45:46 From ms Gomez : in other words, how does compliance allow for the city to
continue its own local control in the varying compliance laws in regards to housing elements and inclusionary zoning?
17:47:23 From Manuel Mancha : doesn't home ownership vs. rental property increas
e crime levels in any community?
17:48:53 From Larry : City already has a shortage in first responders and Code En
forcement officers. What is the city's plan to increase. Right now a code enforcement call can take two weeks to get an officer to the scene. 17:51:33 From Larry : What is the city's plan to renovate and improve "Old town" .

To build new housing around an OLD TOWN area, will not draw consumers to the current OLD TOWN
17:51:50 From ED Alex Byron : Actually Code enforcement is doing a great job!!!
17:
52:58 From M Vaitai : How does the federal opportunity zone come into play wi
th Old Town? Are there partnering lenders and developers in contract? 17:53:10 From ms Gomez : It has been know that policies are used in local governm
ent to stymie apartment development by cities requiring additional amenities that "scare" such developers. Has the state focused on those types of strategic moves?
17:55:27 From Larry : Did the previous ADU question get answered. And does this in
clude garage conversions? Per "Sacramento" there is a 3.5 million home shortage in California. Is Victorville looking to reduce developer costs? 17:55:39 From ms Gomez : its not the correct "term"
18:00:19 From Larry : Mello-roos should not be a solution, it hurts the buyer's
ability to sell the property "later on", as it effect's a purchasures ability to qualify.
18:00:48 From ms Gomez : How does the federal census count affect the housing
needs that we forsee in teh futures
263
18:01:09 From Sandy : Where can a tiny home community be built? 18:02:23 From ms Gomez : Do these housing elements and discussions really address
the homeless crisis?
18:02:33 From Jennifer Neri : Has the City been approached by any investors or deve
lopers at this time?
18:05:03 From ms Gomez : will this be the last workshop on the housing element
or how many can we expect to see and in what period of time? 18:05:12 From M Vaitai : Revitalization of Old Town could benefit with ADU/ Tiny ho
me communities. Addressing the needs of homeless and fix income residents. 18:05:25 From BRIAN HAHN : How are set-backs determined for ADU's? Can they be
changed from year to year? Are our current set-backs conforming to the state's guidelines?
18:08:54 From Gregorio P.erez : 7th st and so of nisqually 18:08:59 From Lupe Camacho : Can you confirm, I thought I heard you state that th
is is the 2nd Housing Element Workshop and there will be one more? 18:10:44 From Lupe Camacho : A draft only, not final? When Final Due? 18:11:19 From trobi : Has the City determined any areas to change existing zoning
ie. re-zone using this general plan update process?
18:12:41 From ms Gomez : what is "market rate" by definitions? 18:12:59 From ms Gomez : is it synonymous to affordability? 18:14:23 From Gregorio P.erez : Near mall Walmart
18:17:21 From Edgar Rodriguez : the Spanish Is very hard to hear. It should be loud
er
18:18:23 From Hitta Mosesman : I informed Irlanda that she was hard to hear and to
speak louder. Thank you for letting us know
18:19:46 From ms Gomez : does that mean and include equal percentages or unequal
as long as there is a variety of option types?
18:21:54 From ms Gomez : I would have to say other because it allows for customi
zation of our demographics and the population of the city of victorville 18:22:02 From Linda Titus : Will patio homes be looked at as an option? 18:25:26 From Larry : OTHER - lack of inventory
18:25:32 From ms Gomez : inequality redlining
18:26:10 From BRIAN HAHN : Mello Roos in some communities 18:26:20 From ms Gomez : and gentrification
18:26:24 From Edgar Rodriguez : we should have more jobs that can provide mortgag
e paying wages and not just service industry jobs
18:26:37 From Harriman (Vice Chair) : higher income demographic 18:26:50 From Linda Titus : City supported programs from condo to single homes
18:3
0:11 From ms Gomez : How can policies and resolutions within housing element
s that come to councils and governments demystify federal subsidies as a means to aid in the housing crisis?
18:32:04 From Edgar Rodriguez : Thank you for the Spanish transmission.

There a
re over 10 people at my work listening in Spanish.
18:34:08 From trobi : Is there a City policy that the commission would like to chan
ge to alleviate homelessness?
18:34:08 From Dima Galkin to Melissa Nelson(Direct Message) : Hi Melissa
,
My internet knocked me out. I'm back now. Can you relabel me as a co-host, please? 18:35:04 From Melissa Nelson to Dima Galkin(Direct Message) : of 264
course! just one second
18:35:08 From BRIAN HAHN : Affordable Housing should be a high priority in Victorv
ille! I live in a community that has driven out a number of families because the Mello Roos exceeds $3000 per year. This is simply not sustainable for most families!
18:36:24 From Larry : How do you solve the Substance addiction which can cause t
he homelessness, but also prevents people from getting goovernment housingg. 18:36:51 From ms Gomez : Ive observed that public service has been as high as 10%
versus administrative costs so how can policies or procedures alleviate and create equity in terms of services to the homeless vs those admin costs? 18:37:01 From Thomas (Commmissioner) : Are there any cities that are doing well wi
th the homeless issue?
18:37:44 From Larry : Affordable homeownership housing and increased invento
ry.
18:38:56 From M Vaitai : Definitely addressing the homeless crisis- positio
n ourselves to better amplify our need for transitional housing and services for homeless. Leverage the county funding.
18:39:06 From Linda Titus : Homelessness prevention is priority. Shared housing
and matching programs. How will the funds from the Master Plan on Aging be allocated to high need areas like Victorville?
18:39:37 From trobi : Enforcement of existing law has essentially been paused
in Victorville, homeless have in effect laid claim to vacant lots. Example of a policy that hasn't been too effective.
18:40:13 From BRIAN HAHN : Addressing the homeless crisis in Victorville should
be one of Victorville's top priorities.
18:40:44 From Jennifer Neri : Affordable housing is a must, many families are liv
ing paycheck to paycheck and a loss to that income are on the verge of being housing insecure.
18:41:28 From Manuel Mancha : Homeownership has been a proven statistic in lowerin
g crime in communities.
18:42:53 From Leslie Earl : Considering Victorville has a 23% poverty rate, why doe
sn't the city commit 23% of their funding toward housing that demographic?? 18:43:07 From Edgar Rodriguez : Thank you for that information. 18:43:25 From Edgar Rodriguez : That was in Boise Idaho 18:44:00 From Leslie Earl : Not the same. The issue I am raising is with the 10-
year plan.
18:44:54 From ms Gomez : Can the city use Measure P ( 15 million ) a portion
to address housing elements?
18:47:53 From Linda Titus : Down payment incentive programs 18:48:03 From Virginia Meijer : I would like to see the city allowing tiny homes t
o be built.
18:48:08 From Larry : Tiny house communities
18:48:13 From ms Gomez : special needs populations
18:48:21 From trobi : Accelerated development process 18:48:28 From Manuel Mancha : Green, Green, Green less restrictions on landsca
ping requirements, requiring solar etc....
18:48:39 From Lorena Santillan : Senior housing
18:48:47 From ms Gomez : Housing by non-profit developers 18:48:51 From trobi : quicker approvals, faster turn around time on plan reveiw
265
18:49:07 From Larry : no mello-roos
18:49:12 From ms Gomez : live-work development
18:49:54 From trobi : Are there any areas that the City believes they have under u
tilized infrastructure and can fast pace development reviews? 18:51:34 From ms Gomez : when will the draft be available for review prior to the
commission hearing?
18:52:56 From ms Gomez : Is it possible to squeeze one more workshop as soon as
the dcity receives back teh reviewed housing element
18:53:19 From Lupe Camacho : Will you have a draft of the Land Development Plan so
on?
18:53:30 From ms Gomez : ALso will the draft be available for the land use plan?
18:5
4:52 From ms Gomez : i would like to raise my hnd
18:54:58 From ms Gomez : i dont have that feature available 18:57:28 From trobi : I agree with the Chairs perception of cause of homeles
snes
18:57:50 From ms Gomez : i want to speak and dont have the hand feature so please
consider me speaking please
18:57:55 From Edgar Rodriguez : build asylums like before for the mental health
18:
59:23 From ms Gomez : how can the public obtain this information? 18:59:57 From ms Gomez : yes, im muted
19:03:03 From ms Gomez : hand raised please for public comment since i dont have th
at feature now
266
Community Workshop #2 (March 15, 2021)
Meeting Notes

267

VICTORVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP

GENERAL PLAN/ 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE

March 15, 2021 @ 5pm

Meeting Notes

Attendees:

1. Rob Kurth

2. Dima Galkin

3. Melissa Nelson

4. Irlanda Martinez

5. Robert Harriman

6. Karem Ostrom

7. Hitta Mosesman

8. “trobi”

9. Kenneth Cook-Askins

10. Thomas (Commissioner)

11. Tara Taguchi

12. Scott Webb

13. iPad_002155

14. Mike Szarzynski

15. Eileen Patterson

16. Joe’s iPhone

17. Virginia Meijer

18. Blanca Gomez

19. 760-***-*568

20. Al Calvert

21. Paul Marsh

22. Sandy

23. Sandie

24. Larry

25. Others up to 36

Notes

1. General Plan Update Public Workshop
a. Presentation agenda
b. Introductions
c. Background – State Requirements
i. Elements like “chapters” of the General Plan “book”
ii. Table shows allocation / requirement for Victorville iii. Housing Element to contain a list of sites
d. Background and information on affordability
i. Data shows that median prices and rent have increased faster than median household income
e. Survey results
i. Description of people who took the survey
f. Why Victorville?
g. Housing Conditions
h. Housing Needed
i. Listed in order by percentage of respondents
i. How to Address Issues?
j. What Should the City Focus On?
k. Housing Strategies
Poll Question 1: Do Results Accurately Represent Housing Conditions/Needs/Preferences? –
17 - yes
5 - no
268
Comments on
• “tiny homes,” including “perhaps on leased land”
• “Inclusion zoning is important”
Poll question 2: What is one biggest housing need in VV? 9 - A (More single family Housing),
2 - B (More single family with smaller lot sizes),
5 - C (More apartments/condos),
8 - D (More affordable housing)
Poll question 3: What kind of housing do you want to see that is not (sufficiently) available in VV?
3 – A (Single Family Detached Homes),
9 – B (Condos/Townhomes),
1 – C (Apartments),
11 – D (Affordable Housing – any kind)
l. Site Inventory
i. Identify the properties by their property numbers (APNs) and identify income level of affordability
ii. Currently Zoned - Market SFR
iii. Currently Zoned - Market MFR
iv. Currently Zoned – Affordable, Old Town
v. Currently Zoned – Affordable, Civic Center
vi. Opportunity Sites – 7 th Street Corridor
vii. O p
portunity Sites – West of Dunia

1. Comment: “There is already a development in progress at Pacoima and BVR. Should be open very very soon.” (It’s a car wash.)
viii. Opportunity Sites – St. Mary’s Campus
ix. Opportunity Sites – South of Nisqualli
x. Opportunity Sites – Walmart Supercenter
xi. Opportunity Sites – Desert Valley Hospital
xii. Comments:

1. “doesn’t housing cause a drain on services to the city?”

2. Re: local control

3. “doesn’t home ownership vs. rental property increase crime levels in any community?”

4. Re: code enforcement

5. “What is the city’s plan to renovate and improve “Old Town.”…

6. Re: Opportunity Zones

7. Re: the State stymying apartment development

8. Re: ADUs

9. “Mello-Roos should not be a solution…”

10. Re: Census’s effect on housing needs

11. “Where can a tiny home be built?”

12. “Do these housing elements and discussions really address the homeless crisis?”

13. “Has the City been approached by any investors or developers at this time?”
269

14. “Will this be the last workshop on the housing element…”

15. “Revitalization of Old Town could benefit with ADU / tine home communities…”

16. “How are setbacks determined for ADUs?...”
Poll question 4: What area needs affordable apartments most? 6 (Old Town),
1 (Civic Center),
3 (7th St. Corridor),
3 (Near
Victorville Mall/ Dunia Plaza),
3 (South of Nisqualli),
0 (Near St. Mary’s Campus),
4 (Near Walmart Center),
1 (Near Death Valley Hospital)
Poll question 5: What area needs market rate units most? 3 (Old Town),
3 (Civic Center),
1 (7th St. Corridor),
6 (Near
Victorville Mall/Dunia Plaza),
0 (South of Nisqualli),
4 (Near St. Mary’s Campus),
4 (Near Walmart Center),
2 (Near Desert Valley Hospital),
Poll question 6: Do you think being able to walk to shopping center or mall would be a benefit?
21 Yes,
4 No
m. Goals
i. Preliminary goals based on feedback received to date. ii. Goal #1 – Variety
Poll question 7: How can the city encourage variety of housing types?
13 (Work with developers),
8 (Change development standards),
1 (Accessory dwelling units),
3 (other)
• Other: “customization of our demographics and the population of the city of Victorville”
• Other: “will patio homes be looked at as an option?”

iii. Goal #2: Homeownership
Poll question 8: What is the biggest challenge for residents to become homeowners?
10 (Down Payment),
3 (Monthly payment),
0 (Maintenance and repair costs),
0 (Personal/ lifestyle preference (prefer to rent),
8 (Other)
270
• Other: lack of inventory
• Other: inequality redlining and gentrification
• Other: Mello-Roos
iv. Comment:
• “We should have more jobs that can provide mortgage paying wages and not just service industry jobs”
• “Higher income demographic”
• “City supported programs from condo to single homes”
v. Goal #3
Poll question 9: Are affordable _apartments_ needed?
13 Yes,
10 No
Poll question 10: Are affordable _condos/townhomes_ needed? 21 Yes,
2 No
Poll question 11: Are affordable _accessory dwelling units_ needed? 13 Yes,
10 No
vi. Goal #4:

n. Question re: other input on goals?
• “How do you solve the substance addiction which can cause the homelessness, but also prevents people from getting government housing.” • “I’ve observed that public service as been as high as 10% versus administrative costs so how can policies or procedures alleviate and create equity in terms of services to the homeless vs those admin costs?” • “Are there any cities that are doing well with the homeless issue?” • “Affordable homeownership housing and increased inventory.” • “Definitely addressing the homeless crisis- position ourselves to better amplify our need for transitional housing and services for homeless. Leverage the county funding.”
• “Homeless prevention is priority. Shared housing and matching programs.

How will the funds from the Master Plan on Aging be allocated to high need areas like Victorville?”
• “Enforcement of existing law has essentially been paused in Victorville, homeless have in effect laid claim to vacant lots. Example of a policy that hasn’t been too effective.”
• “Addressing the homeless crisis in Victorville should be one of Victorville’s top priorities.”
• “Affordable housing is a must, many families are living paycheck to paycheck and a loss to that income are on the very of being housing insecure.” • “Homeownership has been a proven statistic in lowering crime in communities.”
• “Considering Victorville has a 23% poverty rate, why doesn’t the City commit 23% of their funding toward housing that demographic?”
• “Not the same. The issue I am raising is with the 10-year plan.” 271
• “Can the City use Measure P (15 million) a portion to address housing elements?”
o. Question re: other goals? What other housing goals would you like to see the City establish?
• “Down payment incentive programs”
• “I would like to see the city allowing tiny homes to be built.” • “Tiny house communities”
• “Special needs populations”
• “Accelerated development process”
• “Green, green, green less restrictions on landscaping requirements, requiring solar, etc.”
• “Senior housing”
• “Housing by non-profit developers”
• “Quicker approvals, faster turn around time on plan review” • “No Mello-Roos”
• “Live-work development”
p. More Opportunities for Involvement & Input
q. Comment:
• “Are there areas that the City believes they have under utilized infrastructure and can fast pace development reviews?” (Scott said: Old Town & 7th Street Corridor.)”
• “When will the draft be available for review prior to the commission hearing?” • “Is it possible to squeeze one more workshop as soon as the City receives back the reviewed housing element?”
• “Will you have a draft of the Land Development Plan soon?” • “Also will the draft be available for the Land Use Plan?” • Kurth: Need more HOAs and 55+ housing. There was a lot of talk about ADUs. Are new tract plans accommodating for that increased density / infrastructure need? Homelessness, I think it’s not a housing issue, it’s a mental health issue.

272
Community Workshop #2 (March 15, 2021)
Archived Meeting Items

273
Agenda Packet & Video Link (City Website):
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/agendas
274
Meeting Video (YouTube):

275

OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT
• Public Comment Response Summary
• Emails

276

PUBLIC COMMENT RESPONSES
Government Code Section 65583(c )(9) requires that local governments “make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element.” Pursuant to this requirement, and in an effort to engage the City’s constituents in the planning process, the City of Victorville made the Draft Housing Element available to the public for review on July 6, 2021, two weeks prior to submittal to HCD for review.

In order to employ multiple methods for public outreach efforts, particularly to include lower - income and special needs households and neighborhoods with higher concentrations of lower - income households, the City reached out to local community organizations working with the full spectrum of special needs communities. As shown on Table A -1 in pages 91 and 188 of this Appendix A, 229 individuals attended Workshops #1 and #2. Stakeholders contacted included members of the public and representatives of schools, churches, affordable housing properties, affordable housing developers, surrounding cities, water agencies, veteran’s organizations, senior organizations, family assistance organizations, health organizations, among others.

Specifically, the City published the Draft Housing Element draft on July 6, 2021 - one week prior to the joint Planning Commission and City Council public hearing on the Draft Housing Element on July 13, 2021. A public hearing was held with the expressed purpose of collecting public input. The City waited two weeks to submit the Draft Housing Element to HCD on HCD on July 20, 2021 and has been open to receive public comment after the submittal.

It is important to note that all of the public comments received (outside of the public hearing referenced above) was submitted to City staff prior to July 13, 2021. No public comments have been received since the Draft Housing Element was submitted to HCD for review.

A summary of the comments received and the City’s actions to address each comment are provided below:
• February 25, 2021 – “I want to add Senior housing and a Senior Community Center for development.”
 The following programs in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address housing for seniors:
 EP-B.1: Planned Unit Development.
 PP-B.2: Expedite Development.
 EP-D.1: Federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Senior/Disabled Home Repair Program Grants.
 EP-D.2: Repair Service Program for Senior Homeowners.  PP-D.2: Provide Technical Assistance for Rehabilitation Needs. 277
•
March 15, 2021 – “I wanted to address the need to tie the V ictorville Senior Housing needs into the Master Plan on Aging planning and funding. We do not want any missed opportunities to access the available support resources from a developing, planning, or funding standpoint.”
 The following programs in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address housing for seniors:
 EP-B.1: Planned Unit Development.
 PP-B.2: Expedite Development.
 EP-D.1: Federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Senior/Disabled Home Repair Program Grants.
 EP-D.2: Repair Service Program for Senior Homeowners.  PP-D.2: Provide Technical Assistance for Rehabilitation Needs. • March 15, 2021 – “Are you or will you consider a tiny home community for the homeless?”  The following program and policy in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address tiny homes for individuals experiencing homelessness:
 PP-C.3: Plan to Encourage ADUs.
 HE-I.5: Promote innovative strategies for transitional housing for individuals experiencing homelessness.
• March 4, 2021 – “We would like to submit a list of 15 policies that we believe will help lead to an increase in affordable housing and overall equitable development:

1. Adopt a “Housing is a Human Right” ordinance that calls for the development of an internal process that incentivizes building and development throughout the city and/or town and creates a community led housing taskforce that works with the local city and/or town on strategies, solutions and tracks measurable outcomes.  The following programs in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address incentivizing building and development throughout the City:
• PP-A.2: Adopt a Density Bonus Ordinance and Create a Menu of Density Bonuses.
• PP-A.6: Continue to Encourage Single -Family Home Development in Designated Areas.
• PP-A.8: Evaluate and Change Off-Street Parking Requirements • PP-B.2: Expedite Development.
• PP-B.4: Provide a Menu of Incentives/Concessions for Developers. • PP-B.6: SB 35 Streamlined Ministerial and Approval Process. 278
 The f
ollowing program in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element addresses community partnerships and a community -led taskforce:
• PP-J.1: Cooperation with Community-Based Organizations.

2. Allow for mixed use on all commercial lots with a minimum requirement set for commercial use.
 The following program and objective in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address residential uses in commercial areas:
• PP-A.4: Change Zoning in Appropriate Commercial and Residential Zones
• Objective P: Rezone to improve the quality of life by creating more opportunities for mixed-use (residential and commercial) development

3. Re-zone for the development of tiny homes and adopt a policy to streamline the development of tiny homes process.
 The following program and policy in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address tiny homes:
• PP-C.3: Plan to Encourage ADUs
• HE-I.5: Promote innovative strategies for transitional housing for individuals experiencing homelessness.
o Consider tiny homes as a housing solution for residents experiencing homelessness.

4. Adopt a fee for developers that deviate from the preferred square footage zoning and underutilize lot size.
 Additional development fees can act as a barrier to housing development.

Therefore, no programs, policies or actions were added in response.

5. Create a local multi -family housing fund from the developer fees collected from those who deviate from minimum lot size zoning.
 Same comment as above.

6. Adopt a policy that gives property maintenance flexibility to NGOs 1 that purchase housing units for the use of affordable housing. Policy to include a five- year plan to get the property up to code.
 The following program in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element addresses supporting nonprofits with rehabilitation:
• PP-D.3: Support Nonprofits in Pursuing Rehabilitation Programs. 1 NGOs are non-governmental organizations
279

7. E
xempt NGO agencies who rent housing from a private party landlord from having to obtain a renter permit license.
 Renter permit licenses allow the City to understand how many units in the City are rented and may assist with obtaining income level information for occupants.

8. Remove barriers that keep people away from multi -family housing such as Crime Free Multi Family Housing Ordinances.
 The following program in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element addresses removing barriers:
• PP-Q.6: Remove Barriers for Renters.

9. Adopt an Affordable Family Housing Overlay that provides by -right incentives of certain development standards in exchange for a dedication of 20% units as affordable family housing units at very low income
 The following policy in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element addresses inclusionary housing:
• HE-F.2: Analyze the feasibility of an Inclusionary Housing Policy to create additional affordable units and/or generate local funding for affordable housing.

10. Adopt a Mixed Income Housing Ordinance that creates mixed income housing opportunities by requesting that 15% of all new housing construction projected will result in affordable units.
 The following policy in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element addresses inclusionary housing:
• HE-F.2: Analyze the feasibility of an Inclusionary Housing Policy to create additional affordable units and/or generate local funding for affordable housing.

11. Affordable Housing Bond. Government bonds dedicated to funding the capital requirements for building affordable housing, including new construction and rehabilitation of existing stock.
 The following policies and programs in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address affordable housing funding:
• PP-B.4: Provide a Menu of Incentives/Concessions for Developers. • HE-F.2: Analyze the feasibility of an Inclusionary Housing Policy to create additional affordable units and/or generate local funding for affordable housing.
• HE-F.3: Explore establishing a Local Housing Trust, a Community Land Trust, or other nonprofit entity to pool resources and leverage additional funding to produce and preserve affordable housing. 280
• PP
-F.2: Monitor Grant Opportunities and Maximize Grant
Applications.
• PP-F.4: Recurring Notice of Funding Availability.

12. Adopt housing preservation programs such as rent control that allows local governments to regulate the amount of rent landlords can charge to tenants.  The following policy in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element addresses rent stabilization:
• HE-J.1: Explore the feasibility and potential impacts of a Rent Stabilization Ordinance to provide protections from significant rent increases and to prevent homelessness. This would include studying the current rental market in the City, current need, costs to the City, and possible impacts to future rental housing development. The study shall then be considered by City Council.

13. Streamline the permitting process and adopt policies that have financial incentives for developer such as fee waivers.
 The following objective and programs in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address streamlining:
• Objective B: Streamline the housing development process. • PP-B.6: SB 35 Streamlined Ministerial and Approval Process. • PP-A.1: Update the City’s Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance.

14. Adopt a Community Benefit Agreement policy in where developers and city and/or town government bring in residents as part of the development process up front.  The following objective and policy in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element address resident involvement in the development process:
• Objective N: Increase community participation in the planning process
• HE-N.2: Require a community meeting for proposed Specific Plans and Planned Unit Developments as part of the entitlement process so community members can participate in the planning process.

15. Adopt a marketing strategy to promote local Opportunity Zones for the development of affordable housing.
 The following program in Chapter 7: Goals and Policies of the Housing Element addresses the promotion of Opportunity Zones:
• PP-F.1: Advertise Available Resources.

281
Irlanda Martinez
From: Charlene A. Johnson <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 11:32 AM
To: Dima Galkin; Hitta Mosesman
Cc: Irlanda Martinez; Scott Webb
Subject: [External]Comment Received
Attachments: Housing & Land Use meeting; Senior Affairs Master Plan Comment.pdf; Women of Noble Character Comment.pdf; FW: Housing Element Comment Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Good Morning,

We have
received a few comments regarding the General Plan Update, I’ve attached them for your use.

Best Regards,

282
Irlanda Martinez
From: Lorena Santillan <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:12 PM
To: Planning Division
Subject: Housing & Land Use meeting
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do n ot click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

G
ood afternoon,
Thank you for the meeting yesterday. I found it valuable and insightful for the future of our city. I want to add Senior housing and a Senior Community Center for development.

Thank you,
Lorena Santillan
283
Charlene A. Johnson
From: Planning Division
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 7:36 AM
To: Charlene A. Johnson; Scott Webb
Subject: FW: Master Plan for Aging
From: Linda Tit
us, PA, RN <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 7:20 PM
To: Planning Division <[email protected]>
Subject: Master Plan for Aging
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
https://m
pa.aging.ca.gov/Goals/1
Hello Mr. Webb
,
I wanted to address the need to tie the Victorville  Senior Housing needs into the Master Plan on Aging planning and funding. We do not want any missed opportunities to  access the available support resources from a developing , planning , or funding standpoint.

Is there any one from the Victorville area on the Master Planning Task force? There are five goals of the MPA.  Housing is numbe
r one because of the need and growth of the senior population.  I will  continue to share information on an as requested basis , if you like.

Great seeing you tonight.

Keep up the good work!
Kind regards,
Linda Ti
tus, PA, RN
Chair, Senior Affairs Commission
San Bernardino County
284
Charlene A. Johnson
From: Scott Webb
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 4:24 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Charlene A. Johnson
Subject: RE: General Plan Update
Hi Ms. Studebake,
Yes, the City will be considering the allowance a various housing types as part of the General Plan Update. Thank you for your comment.

Best regards,
From: San
dy Studebaker <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 2:33 PM
To: Planning Division <[email protected]>
Subject: General Plan Update
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,
I volunteer with Women of Noble Character. We are a local nonprofit serving the homeless community. Are you or will you consider a tiny home community for the homeless? Sincerely,
Sandy Studebaker
285
Irlanda Martinez
From: Scott Webb <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 2:46 PM
To: Hitta Mosesman; Dima Galkin; Irlanda Martinez
Cc: Charlene A. Johnson; Michael Szarzynski
Subject: [External]FW: Public comment for Housing Element Update Attachments: Policy Recommendations for Housing Plan Element 2021-2029.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hi Housing Team,

Attache
d are some policy recommendation from the public.

Best regards,

From: HD
Intersections Collaborative <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 9:40 AM
To: Scott Webb <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Public comment for Housing Element Update

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning Scott,

Thank you very much for hosting the workshops on the update Housing Plan Element and Land Use. We also appreciate the willingness to hear from Spanish speakers and to create other avenues to get feedback through the survey.

A few of our collaborative members have participated and we have encouraged our community networks to also attend and/or complete your survey.

In addition to this we would like to submit a list of 15 policies that we believe will help lead to an increase in affordable housing and overall equitable development.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
286

High Desert Intersections Collaborative, Housing Committee 287

Housing Element Update
2021- 2029

Needs to focus on diverse development & affordability

As part of the required update on the housing plan element, cities and towns should prioritize policies that lead to diverse housing stock and affordable housing. As well as overall equitable development that is accessible to needed amenities such as, green space, grocery stores, jobs and safe and efficient transportation. Below are fifteen policy recommendations that we ask to be considered as part of the 2021- 2029 housing plan update.

288
Policy Recommendations à Goal

1. Adopt a Housing is a human right
ordinance that calls for the
development of an internal process
that incentivizes building and
development throughout the city
and/or town and creates a community
led housing taskforce that works with
the local city and/or town on
strategies, solutions and tracks
measurable outcomes.
à
Incentivize developers to work with High
Desert cities by presenting a clear strategy of
our local development goals.

2. Allow for mixed use on all commercial
lots with a minimum requirement set
for commercial use.
à
Incentivize development of multifamily,
mixed use housing, improve access to job
opportunities and promote walkability.

3. Re-zone for the development of tiny
homes and adopt a policy to
streamline the development of tiny
homes process.
à
Incentivize development of market rate
affordable housing stock

4. Adopt a fee for developers that deviate
from the preferred square footage
zoning and underutilize lot size.
à
Incentivize the development of the adopted
preferred square footage zoning and
maximize lot sizes.

5. Create a local multi-family housing
fund from the developer fees
collected from those who deviate
from minimum lot size zoning.
à
Incentivize development of multi-family
housing by assisting with local capital to be
used as density bonuses.

6. Adopt a policy that gives property
maintenance flexibility to NGO’s that
purchase housing units for the use of
affordable housing. Policy to include a
five-year plan to get the property up to
code.
à
Incentivize the acquisition of housing by NGOs
to be used for affordable housing, expedite
occupancy times and prevent slums.

7. Exempt NGO agencies who rent
housing from a private party landlord
from having to obtain a renter permit
license.
à
Incentive the use of rental housing by NGOs for
transitional use housing.
289

8. Remove barriers that keep people
away from multi-family housing such as
Crime Free Multi Family Housing
Ordinances.

à
Incentivize access to affordable housing for all
residents, including those who have come out
of the criminal justice system.

9. Adopt an Affordable Family Housing
Overlay that provides by-right
incentives of certain development
standards in exchange for a dedication
of 20% units as affordable family
housing units at very low income.

à

Incentivize the development of affordable
housing units in diverse parts of the city and/or
town.

10. Adopt a Mixed Income Housing
Ordinance that creates mixed income
housing opportunities by requesting
that 15% of all new housing
construction projected will result in
affordable units.

à
Incentivize balanced development of housing
that includes both market rate and affordable
housing throughout the city and/or town.

11. Affordable Housing Bond.

Government bonds dedicated to
funding the capital requirements for
building affordable housing, including
new construction and rehabilitation of
existing stock.

à
Creates a local funding opportunity that will
allow us to work with private partners to build
more housing.

12. Adopt housing preservation programs
such as rent control that allows local
governments to regulate the amount
of rent landlords can charge to tenants.

à
Ensures that people who are on fixed income,
like seniors, veterans and people who are on
disability have access to affordable housing.

13. Streamline the permitting process and
adopt policies that have financial
incentives for developer such as fee
waivers.

à
Incentivizes the development of housing
throughout the city and/or town.

14. Adopt a Community Benefit Agreement
policy in where developers and city
and/or town government bring in
residents as part of the development
process up front.

à
Incentivizes development that is receptive to
resident needs, promotes support for projects
which can save time and money.

15. Adopt a marketing strategy to
promote local Opportunity Zones for
the development of affordable
housing.

à
Incentivize the development of
neighborhoods by promoting tax incentives.

290
Sample Policy Models
• Adopt internal process to streamline development: Build Riverside • Affordable Family Housing Overlay: City of Anaheim (2011); County of Orange (2006); City of Oakley (2005 & 2006) • Mixed Income Housing Ordinance: City of Irvine (2006) • Affordable Housing Trust Funds: Housing Trust Silicon Valley; Orange County Housing Finance Trust; Ornate County Ho
using Trust.
• Affordable Housing Bond: Alameda County Housing Bond; Santa Clara County Housing Bond. • Affordable Housing Land Trust: City of Irvine
• Housing Preservation Programs: Santa Monica; West Hollywood. • Community Benefit Agreements: Gates Cherokee Denver, Co; LAX, LA; Staples Center, LA. • Hous
ing is a huma right: United Nations declaration of housing as a human right; Sate of California constitution of housing as a human right.
291

Document prepared by the High Desert Intersections Collaborative The Intersections Collaborative is a broad-based coalition made up of diverse partners with the mission of improving health and advancing equity in the High Desert Community.

292
Irlanda Martinez
From: Scott Webb <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 9:24 AM
To: Hitta Mosesman; Dima Galkin; Irlanda Martinez
Cc: Michael Szarzynski
Subject: FW: Master Plan for Aging
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hi Hitta and Team,
Great job
last night! The member of the public that spoke regarding the Master Plan for Aging sent the following email. I was unaware of this State plan, but it seems like useful information that can be referenced in the Housing Element and possibly other elements we’re updating. Please share with the other members of the team as you see fit. https://mpa.aging.ca.gov/
B
est regards,
F
rom: Planning Division <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 7:36 AM
To: Charlene A. Johnson <[email protected]>; Scott Webb <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Master Plan for Aging
From: Linda Titus, PA, RN <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 7:20 PM
To: Planning Division <[email protected]>
Subject: Master Plan for Aging
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do n ot click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
h
ttps://mpa.aging.ca.gov/Goals/1
H
ello Mr. Webb ,
293
I wanted to address the need to tie the Victorville Senior Housing needs into the Master Plan on Aging planning and funding. We do not want any missed opportunities to access the available support resources from a developing , planning , or funding standpoint.

Is there any one from the Victorville area on the Master Planning Task force? There are five goals of the MPA. Housing is

number one because of the need and growth of the senior population. I will continue to share information on an as requested basis , if you like.

Great seeing you tonight.

Keep up the good work!
Kind regards,
Linda Titus, PA, RN
Chair, Senior Affairs Commission
San Bernardino County
294

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-1
APPENDIX B: AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING

FAIR HOUSING
Assembly Bill (AB) 686, passed in 2018, requires cities and counties to administer programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to further fair housing affirmatively and not to take any action that is materially inconsistent with this obligation. AB 686 defined “affirmatively further fair housing” to mean “taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity” for people of color, people with disabilities, and other protected classes.

AB 686 requires that all Housing Elements prepared on or after January 1, 2021, include the following:
• An assessment of fair housing within the jurisdiction that includes the following components: A summary of fair housing issues and an assessment of the jurisdiction’s fair housing enforcement and outreach capacity, an analysis of segregation patterns and disparities in access to opportunities, an assessment of contributing factors, and an identification of fair housing goals and actions.
• Inclusion of affirmatively furthering fair housing as part of achieving the goals and objectives of the Housing Element.
• Incorporation of affirmatively furthering fair housing in the Sites Inventory.

The City of Victorville (City or Victorville) has completed the following outreach and analysis to inform the Housing Element and all housing goals, policies, and programs to meet State law housing requirements. The City’s objective is to promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities throughout the community for all people regardless of age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, s exual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, and genetic information.

Outreach
As discussed in Appendix A, Public Engagement, of the Housing Element the City held two virtual public community workshops and five stakeholder meetings and conducted a public survey in addition to holding a joint Planning Commission and City Council meeting on July 13, 2021, to present the Draft Housing Element.

The public community workshops were noticed through the City’s website, social media accounts, mailers, and public email system. Due to restrictions resulting from the COVID -19

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-2
pandemic, t he workshops were held virtually via Zoom on weekday evenings to facilitate participation. Five stakeholder meetings were held to provide an opportunity for affordable housing developers to collaborate with the City and to discuss housing needs and opportunities.

The City also conducted a public survey that was available on the City’s website, with 104 responses received.

The outreach conducted by the City before and throughout the Housing Element update process engaged community members throughout the City. Because of the City’s large proportion of Spanish-speaking residents, t he City has made an intentional effort to reach non- English speaking households and to provide all materials in English and Spanish, along with Spanish interpretation during public meetings.

Assessment of Fair Housing Issues
California Government Code, Section 65583 (10)(A)(ii) , requires all counties in California to analyze areas of segregation, racially /ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. To assist in this analysis of integration and segregation, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) convened the California Fair Housing Task Force to “provide research, evidence-based policy recommendations, and other strategic recommendations to HCD and other related state agencies/departments to further the fair housing goals (as defined by HCD).” The Task Force creates “Opportunity Area” maps to identify resource levels across the State “to accompany new policies aimed at increasing access to high opportunity areas for families with children in housing financed with 9% Low -Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs) .” The maps are created using composite scores of three different “ domains,” each consisting of a set of indicators. The maps include a measure or “filter” to identify areas with poverty and racial segregation. To identify these areas, census tracts were first filtered by poverty and then by a measure of racial segregation. The criteria for these filters are as follows:
• Poverty: Tracts include at least 30% of population under Federal poverty line. • Racial Segregation: Tracts with location quotient higher than 1.25 for African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, or all people of color in comparison to the San Bernardino County (County) high segregation and poverty census tracts are, therefore, areas of over - concentrated low‐income and minority households with limited access t o resources and pathways to success.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-3
California Tax Credit Allocation Committee/California Department of Housing and Community Development Opportunity Area Map
The 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map uses composite index scores of three different domains (economic, environmental, and education) to categorize tracts as low, moderate, or high resource. Categorization is based on percentile rankings for census tracts within the Inland Empire region (Imperial, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties), and higher composite scores mean higher resources. Within San Bernardino County , most of the high and highest resource areas are in the San Bernardino Valley or rural areas in the San Bernardino National Forest.

However, the Victor Valley region, where the City is located, ranges almost entirely between low and m oderate resource areas, with pockets of high segregation and poverty . In 2018 , the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map showed the majority of the census tracts i n the City as low resource areas , with a few census tracts in the West City and Central City planning areas identified as High Segregation and Poverty areas. The 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map identifies 12 of the City’s census tracts as low resourc e, three as moderate resource, and four as high segregation and poverty . (Note: Two census tracts within the City have missing/insufficient data.) The most notable change from the 2018 designations is the upgraded status of the moderate resource census tracts. Table B-1 shows the scores by domain for each census tract in 2021.

Table B-1. Opportunity Area Map Scores and Categorization

CENSUS TRACT

ECONOMIC
DOMAIN
SCORE

ENVIRONMENTAL

DOMAIN SCORE

EDUCATION
DOMAIN
SCORE

COMPOSITE
INDEX
SCORE

FINAL CATEGORY
06071009110 0.179 0.814 0.125 -0.392 Low Resource
06071009116 (BG 4) 0.354 0.493 0.028 N/A High Segregation and Poverty
06071009117 (BG 2) N/A N/A N/A N/A Missing/Insufficient Data
06071009118 0.295 0.947 0.115 -0.266 Moderate Resource
06071009119 (BG 3) 0.674 0.507 0.111 -0.208 Low Resource 06071009800 0.003 0.718 0.022 N/A High Segregation and
Poverty
06071009904 0.029 0.806 0.031 N/A High Segregation and
Poverty
06071009905 0.166 0.752 0.006 -0.718 Low Resource
06071009906 0.165 0.893 0.268 -0.307 Low Resource
06071009908 0.164 0.822 0.212 -0.364 Low Resource
06071009910 0.069 0.778 0.384 -0.374 Low Resource
06071009911 0.151 0.929 0.212 -0.348 Low Resource
06071009912 0.018 0.759 0.029 N/A High Segregation and
Poverty
06071009913 0.019 0.767 0.004 -0.972 Low Resource
06071010004 0.523 0.924 0.3 0.007 Moderate Resource
06071010009 0.158 0.571 0.098 -0.524 Low Resource
06071010025 0.208 0.689 0.028 -0.535 Low Resource
06071010026 0.161 0.657 0.018 -0.649 Low Resource
06071011700 (BG 1) 0.049 0.201 0.229 -0.613 Low Resource 06071012101 0.46 0.632 0.097 -0.271 Moderate Resource
06071980200 N/A N/A N/A N/A Missing/Insufficient
Data
Note: TCAC/HCD separate rural areas into block groups, which are indicated in the table with “BG”.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-4
The three moder ate resource census tracts generally correspond to the entire Baldy Mesa Planning Area, a large part of the West City Planning Area, and small portions in the City’s southeastern and northeastern areas. Figure B-1 illustrates the categorization of resource areas in and around the City.

TCAC and HCD identify between one and five indicators for each domain. The indicators are:
• Poverty
• Adult education
• Employment
• Job proximity
• Median home value
• Exposures and environmental effects, as measured for CalEnviroScreen 3.0 • Math proficiency
• Reading proficiency
• High School graduation rates
• Student poverty rate
Because the indicator scores are measured differently from each other (e.g., percent versus dollar amount), TCAC/HCD calculates a unit-less “z-score” for each indicator. The z-scores are averaged by domain, and the domain scores are averaged to create an index score. Higher index scores indicate higher levels of access to opportunity. As described in this appendix , the City analyzed several additional factors to assess patterns that may further fair housing issues and to identify actions to combat these barriers to accessing opportunities.

The City has conducted the following analysis of available data to assess local access to opportunities and indicators of fair housing issues in addition to the designations provided by the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map. Data for disability was available at the City and regional (county subdivision) levels, while data for poverty rates, opportunity areas, housing cost burden, jobs proximity, and diversity were available at the block group level , and data for familial status was available at the zip code level. The City used the most localized levels of data available for this analysis and the 2014–2018 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates for consistency with the demographic data prepared in the Southern California Association of Governments pre-certified data packet and incorporated into the Housing Element.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-5
Patterns of Integration and Segregation
Concentrations of Minority Population
The 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map combines both poverty and patterns of minority concentrations. Census tracts that have both a poverty rate of over 30% and are designated as racially segregated are filtered into the “High Segregat ion and Poverty” category . Using the definition from the Apple Valley/Victorville Consortium Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) prepared in 2015, the Housing Element defines a “concentration” as “a census tract block group with a proportion of a particular race/ethnic group greater than that of the countywide average for that group.”
Figures B-2 through B-5 illustrate the concentrations of minorities in general and African American, Hispanic, and Asian populations per the 2014– 2018 ACS 5 -Year Estimates . As shown, a total of 13 census block groups in the City exceed the County minority concentration average of 39%, mostly in the central, northern, and northeastern areas of the City. Figures B-2 through B-5 were compared to figures in the AI to understand demographic changes in the City from 2010 to 2018. The AI figures illustrated that in 2010, the City had a minority concentration in the following planning areas: Baldy Mesa, West Bear Valley, West City, SCLA, Central City, and North Mojave. By 2018, the City had fewer areas with a minority concentration.

As of 2018, a majority of the block groups in the City have an African American and/or Hispanic concentration. More specifically, 32 of the 43 census block groups in the City (i.e., most of the City area) exceed the County African American concentration average of 8%. In 2010, 36 of 43 census block groups had an African American concentration. Eighteen census block groups in the City exceed the County Hispanic concentration average of 53% (covering most residential areas of the City). In 2010, the City had 17 census block groups with a Hispanic concentration.

The small change in the number of block groups with a Hispanic concentration masks the changes in the location of the City’s Hispanic concentrations. Seven block groups with a Hispanic concentration in 2010 (primarily in the Baldy Mesa, West Bear Valley, and West City planning areas) no longer had a concentration in 2018. Meanwhile five block groups without a Hispanic concentration in 2010 developed one by 2018, mostly in the Central City and West City planning areas near Bear Valley Road.

A total of seven census block groups in the City exceed the County Asian concentration average of 7%—three census block groups are near Highway 18 in the West City and West Bear Valley Planning Areas, and four census block groups are elsewhere in the City. In 2010, the City’s only Asian concentration was in the SCLA planning area. The number of City block groups with Asian concentration has increased throughout the city since 2010.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-6
Areas with Limited English Proficiency
According to the 2014– 2018 ACS 5- Year Estimates, approximately 18% of City residents are foreign born, compared to 21% of County residents. This data is important so the City can ensure residents are treated fairly in housing regardless of national origin. The foreign-born portion of the population may be more susceptible to discrimination due to limited English proficiency.

The U.S. Census Bureau defines a “linguistically isolated household” as a household in which all members age 14 years and older speak a non-English language and also speak English less than “very well.” The ACS provides information on households with populations 5 years and older who speak English “less than very well.” In the City, the linguistically isolated population is estimated at 13% of the population, according to the 2014–2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates. The language most commonly spoken by residents who speak English “less than very well” is Spanish.

Language barriers may not only prevent residents from accessing serv ices, information, and housing but may also affect educational attainment and em ployment. On August 11, 2000, President Clinton signed Executive Order 13166 (Improving Access to Services by Persons with Limited English Proficiency ). The Executive Order requires Federal agencies to assess and address the needs of otherwise eligible people seeking access to federally conducted programs and activities and who, due to limited English proficiency, cannot fully and equally participate in or benefit from those programs and activities. This requirement also applies to Federal fund grantees and sub recipients. Therefore, the City is required to comply with this regulation.

Concentration of Poverty
Figure B-6 identifies concentrations of poverty in Victorville by census block group per the 2014– 2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates. A concentrated area of poverty is defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as a census tract where the percentage of individuals living in households with incomes below the poverty rate is more than the lesser of 40% or three times the average poverty rate for the metropolitan area. The City is located in the Riverside- San Bernardino-Ontario metropolitan area, where the average poverty rate (according to 2014– 2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates) is approximately 16%.

As shown on Figure B-6, concentrations of poverty are most prominent along I-15, with six block groups along the corridor having a concentration of poverty , three of which are identified as minority concentration block groups ( Figure B-2). The poverty rate is highest in Census Tract 98, Block Group 2, where 72.5% of the households have an income below the poverty level. Six of the City’s 43 census tracts (14%) have a concentration of poverty, compared to 82 of the County’s 1,092 census tracts (8%). The AI identified the City’s low- and moderate-income areas in 2010. The majority of these areas are located along the I-15 Freeway and in the Baldy Mesa and Golden Triangle planning areas. The census block groups in Baldy Mesa and Golden Triangle identified in the AI as low- and moderate-income areas now have a lower percentage

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-7
of households living below poverty, indicating that incomes in those block groups have increased since 2010.

The Sites Inventory (Appendix C of the Housing Element) identifies 9% of all units (at all income levels) and 23% of lower -income units on sites in areas with a concentration of poverty due to the fact that the City’s primary areas that currently al low higher densities are in the areas with concentrations of poverty.

Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty
In an effort to identify R/ECAPs, HUD has identified census tracts with the majority of non-White population (greater than 50%) and a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or three times the average census tract poverty rate for the metro/micro area, whichever threshold is lower. In Victorville, these three R/ECAP census tracts are north of Mojave Drive along I -15 and along the City’s northern boundaries and around the Southern California Logistics Airport (SCLA), as shown on Figure B-7. It should be noted that the areas along the City’s northern boundaries are sparsely populated and are likely designated as R/ECAP s based on people residing outside of the City (as census tracts can cross city boundaries). In 2010, the City only had one census tract with an R/ECAP designation, which crossed the boundary between the City and Adelanto. The City’s R/ECAP areas have increased since 2010.

Diversity Index
The Diversity Index from ESRI represents the likelihood that two people, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. Ethnic diversity, as well as racial diversity, is included in the Housing Element’s definition of the Diversity Index. ESRI’s diversity calculations accommodate up to seven race groups: six single- race groups (White, African American , American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, Some Other Race) and one multiple-race group (two or more races). Each race group is divided into two ethnic origins, Hispanic and Non-Hispanic. If an area is ethnically diverse, then racial diversity is compounded. The Diversity Index ranges from zero (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). If an area’s entire population belongs to one race group and one ethnic group, then an area has zero diversity. An area’s Diversity Index increases to 100 when the population is evenly divided into two or more race/ethnic groups.

The relative diversity of different areas of the City is illustrated through the 2019 Diversity Index (Table B-2 and Figure B -8). The City’s three zip codes each have a Diversity Index of 87 or higher, indicating that the City has high levels of diversity. Within the High Desert, the Diversity Index is highest in the City’s northern census tracts and in Adelanto. The rest of the City has a higher index than Hesperia, Apple Valley, and nearby unincorporated communities.

Table B-2. Diversity Index by Zip Code

ZIP CODE DIVERSITY INDEX
92392 87.5
92394 88.3
92395 87.3

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-8
Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence
While R/ECAPs have long been the focus of fair housing policies, racially concentrated areas of affluence (RCAAs) must also be analyzed to ensure housing is integrated, a key to fair housing choice. According to “Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence: A Preliminary Investigation” authored by Edward G. Goetz, Anthony Damiano, and Rashad A. Williams of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota (a policy paper published by HUD), RCAA is defined as an affluent, White community. The policy paper goes on to state that “Whites are the most racially segregated group in the United States and in the same way neighborhood disadvantage is associated with concentrated poverty and high concentrations of people of color, conversely, distinct advantages are associated with residence in affluent, White communities.” RCAAs have not been studied extensively or defined precisely by HCD or HUD. The Housing Element uses a definition recommended by Veronica Tam & Ass ociates (part of the consulting team that assisted the City with the Housing Element), based on their extensive coordination with HCD and preparation of multiple Housing Elements in the San Diego Association of Governments region that concluded in June 2021 . That definition uses the percent of White population (i.e., 40%) and median household income (top quartile) as proxies to identify potential areas of racial concentration and affluence.

According to the 2014–2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates, White households in the City have a median income of approximately $3,200, or 6%, more than all households. In the County, White households have a median income of approximately $1,700, or 3%, more than all households. As shown on Figure B-9, census tracts with a White population over 40% and household income in the top median-income quartile of all City census tracts (greater than $67,100), are mostly located in the Baldy Mesa, West Bear Valley, and West City Planning Areas. Table B-3 presents data from the 2014–2018 ACS 5- Year Estimates. As indicated in Table B -3, White residents make up approximately 64% of City residents, compared to approximately 61% of County residents, according to the 2014 –2018 ACS 5- Year Estimates. Within the High Desert, RCAAs are most common in the City’s western census block groups and in parts of Apple Valley and Hesperia.

Table B-3. White Household Income and Population Percentage

CITY OF VICTORVILLE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
All Households $50,691 $60,164
White Alone $53,904 $61,892
White Population 64% 61%
Familial Status
Familial status refers to the presence of children under the age of 18, whether the child is biologically related to the head of household, and the marital status of the head of household.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-9
Adults Living Alone or With Spouse
According to the 2014–2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates, the percentage of adults in the City living with their spouse is approximately 40%, compared to approximately 43% of adults in the County.

Local block groups with the highest shares of adults living with their spouse are located in the City’s northeastern, southeastern, and southern areas, as seen o n Figure B-10. Approximately 11% of married -couple households in the City and approximately 8% of married- couple households in the County live below the poverty line. Within the High Desert, the concentration of adults living with a spouse is highest in Hesperia and Apple Valley. Although the City has lower concentrations, some southern and eastern block groups in the City contain concentrations that are high in comparison to the rest of the City.

Approximately 7% of City heads of household and 8% of County heads of household live alone.

As shown on Figure B-11, the largest share of adults living alone in the City is in the East Bear Valley Planning Area. Census Tract 91.17, Block Group 2, has a higher share of adults living alone, 23.1%, but most of that block group’s population lives outside of the City. This block group and an Apple Valley block group have the highest shares of adults living alone throughout the High Desert.

Children in Married-Couple Households
As stated in the AI, f amilies with children may experience housing discrimination as some landlords either may fear that children will cause property damage and/or may have cult ural biases against children of the opposite sex sharing a bedroom. Differential treatments, such as limiting the number of children in a complex or confining children to a specific location, are also fair housing concerns. According to the 2014– 2018 ACS 5- Year Estimates, more than half of children under 18 live in married-couple households throughout the City, as shown on Figure B-

12. This rate is highest within the City i n the 92394 zip code, where 58% of children under 18 live in married-couple households compared to 67% in the County as a whole. A total of 20% of families in the City live below the poverty line. Within the High Desert, the concentration of children in married-couple families is highest in Apple Valley, followed by the northern parts of the City.

Children in Single Female-Headed Households
Single-parent households require special consideration and assistance because of their greater needs for daycare, healthcare, and other facilities. Female- headed households with children tend to have lower incomes, thus limiting housing availability for this group. Fair housing law protects single parent households. According to the 2014– 2018 ACS 5 -Year Estimates, 34% and 32% of children under 18 live in f emale-headed households in the 92394 and 92395 zi p codes, respectively, as shown on Figure B -13. Within the High Desert, the concentration of

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-10
children in single female-headed households is highest in the City of Adelanto, followed by the northern and eastern parts of the City, as well as northern Hesperia.

Access to Opportunity
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Environmental Health Hazard Index
The Environmental Health Hazard Index is a measure of potential exposure to harmful toxins at a neighborhood level. HUD calculates this index as a percentile of national census tracts, ranging from zero to 100. The higher the index value, the less exposure to toxins harmful to human health and the better the environmental quality of a census block group.

As of 2018, the majority of the rated areas in the City have moderate to high ratings on HUD’s Environmental Health Hazard Index, ranging from 43 to 84, indicating that exposure to environmental hazards is fairly limited. Old Town has a higher exposure to environmental hazards with a rating of 43. It should be noted that a large portion of the City is not rated; it is not clear from the Environmental Health Hazard Index webpage why this is the case.

California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool The California Office of Environmental Healt h Hazard Assessment developed a screening methodology tool called the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen) to help identify California communities disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution. Census tracts with high scores are more burdened by pollution from multiple sources and are most vulnerable to impacts , given the socio-economic characteristics and underlying health data. The Draft CalEnviroScreen 4.0 tool provides scores for all census tracts in Victorville. These scores range from 28 to 88, indicating a wide range of health burdens.

Access to Public Transit
As stated in the AI, equal provision of transit services is indirectly a fair housing issue if public transit does not adequately serve tra nsit-dependent populations, thereby limiting their housing choice. One way to measure this is to compare the relationship between existing transit routes, employment centers, and areas where residents are using transit regularly.

The City is served by Vict or Valley Transit Authority, with bus lines along I -15 and the C ity’s primary arterials and connections to other cities in the Victor Valley, cities in the San Bernardino Valley, and the City of Barstow. The AI reports that public transit in the Victor Val ley region is inadequate to meet the needs of residents. Survey participants noted that service was infrequent and schedules were difficult to decipher. As a result, it often takes an entire day to travel from one side of the Victor Valley to the other. However, Victor Valley Transit offers several flexible transit programs designed to complement its bus route network.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-11
AllTransit is a data repository managed by the Center for Neighborhood Technology, an award- winning innovations laboratory for urban sustainability. AllTransit explores metrics that reveal the social and economic impact of transit, specifically looking at connectivity, access to jobs, and frequency of service. The City ’s AllTransit performance score is 3.8, while San Bernardino County has a sc ore of 4.4, illustrating a low combination of trips per week and number of jobs accessible, which enable only a few people to take transit to work in the County and even fewer in the City. Only 0.36% of workers in the City use public transportation (excluding taxicab) to get to work, which is less than the County’s rate of 1.5% of workers. Figure B -14 illustrates what areas of the City are within a half -mile of a transit ( primarily bus) stop. The locations of transit stops is based on data from Transitland, a community-edited data service aggregating transit networks across metropolitan and rural areas around the world.

Proximity to Jobs
As shown on Figure B-15, as measured by HUD’s Jobs Proximity Index, the areas in the City with the best access to job centers are those along the I-15 corridor, northeastern portion of the City, and near the Southern California Logistics Airport in the SCLA planning area. According to the 2014-2018 ACS 5 Year Estimates, the average commute travel times to work for City and County residents were 35 and 31 minutes, respectively. Nearly all of the City’s major employers are also directly on or adjacent to public transit routes. The areas with the most limited access to jobs (the Baldy Mesa Planning Area, and parts of the West Bear Valley and West City Planning Areas, as shown on the map) actually have a higher resource designation according to the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map, suggesting that the lack of jobs in this area does not present a barrier to residents. Chapter 2, Community Profile, of the Housing Element presents additional information on employment by industry and occupation. Within the High Desert, job proximity is most prominent in the Cities of Adelanto and Apple Valley, followed by the eastern portion of the City.

Education
The City is served by the Victor Elementary School District, the Victor Valley Union High School District, the Adelanto Elementary School District, the Hesperia Unified School District , and the Snowline Joint Unified School District, as well as Victor Valley Community College.

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was passed in 1965. It is often regarded as the most far-reaching Federal legislation affecting education ever passed by Congress. The act is an extensive statute that funds primary and secondary education while emphasizing equal access to education and establishing high standards and accountability. A major component of the ESEA is a series of programs typically referred to as “Title I.” Title I programs distribute funding to schools and school districts with a high percentage of students from low -income families. To qualify as a Title I school, a school typically must have around 40% or more of its students coming from families who are low income. The programs also give priority to schools

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-12
that are in obvious need of funds, low -achieving schools, and schools that demonstrate a commitment to improving their education standards and test scores.

Under Title I, the Community Eligibility Provision allows the nation’s highest poverty schools and districts to serve breakfast and lunch at no cost to all enrolled students without collecting household applications. The Victor Elementary School District, the Adelanto Elementary School District, the Hesperia Unified School District, and the Snowline Joint Unified School District have implemented the Community Eligibility Provision districtwide or at specific schools.

Figure B-16 shows what areas of the City are within 1 mile of a school, based on the California School Campus Database. School access is consistent throughout the City , with a significant majority of the City’s area and 77% of the projected units in the Sites Inventory located within 1 mile of a school. All projected units are within 1.5 miles from a school, except for the units on Site 28, a proposed and entitled two- unit development located on the City’s outskirts, approximately 2.6 miles from a school.

The schools in Victorville appear to vary in ratings and rankings . School-Ratings.com provides ratings for schools where higher percentiles indicate higher-quality schools. F our of the City’s schools are between the 76th and 87th percentiles, 11 schools are rated between the 24th and 66th percentiles, and 17 schools are rated between zero and the 18th percentiles (1 school is unranked).

Population with a Disability
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) defines a disability as a “physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.” Fair housing choice for people with disabilities can be compromised based on the nature of their disability. People with physical disabilities may face discrimination in the housing market because of the use of wheelchairs, need for home modifications to improve accessibility, or other forms of assistance.

Landlords/owners may fear that a unit may sustain wheelchair damage or may refuse to exempt disabled tenants with service/guide animals from a no-pet policy. A major barrier to housing for people with mental disabilities is opposition based on the stigma of mental disability. Landlords may refuse to rent to tenants with a history of mental illness. Neighbors may object when a house becomes a group home for people with mental disabilities.

According to 2014– 2018 ACS 5- Year Estimates , in the County, 227,837 res idents, or approximately 11% of all County residents, were identified as having a disability. The percentage of residents with disabilities in the Victorville-Hesperia County Subdivision is 13%. Figure B -17 takes a regional view, illustrating the share of residents with a disability in the Victorville-Hesperia County Subdivision and adjacent subdivisions. The Inland Regional Center, which is the regional center contracted by the California Department of Developmental Services , provides programs and services that further aid in meeting the needs of those with physical, mental, and developmental disabilities for County residents.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-13
An estimated 13,135 City residents, approximately 11% of all City residents, were identified as having a disability. According to the AI, special housing needs for people with disabilities fall into two general categories:
• Physical design to address mobility impairments
• In-home social, educational, and medical support to address developmental and mental impairments
According to the 2014–2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 5,459 people, or approximately 42% of City residents with a disability, have a developmental disability. As shown on Figure B-18, the census block groups with the highest concentration of people with disabilities (i.e., more than 24%) are located in the Central City Planning Area. These census block groups feature the highest concentration of residents living with a disability in the High Desert. This concentration is in part due to the presence of three assisted living facilities within the area: Green Tree Residence, Sierra Vista Independent & Assisted Living, and Knolls West Residential Care. City staff compared data on disability in the 2014– 2018 ACS 5- Year Estimates to the same data in the 2008-2012 ACS 5-Year Estimates. (2010 data was not available.) Several census block groups in the City experienced an increase in the percentage of residents living with a disability from 2012, as did some block groups in each neighboring jurisdiction. Residents in assisted living facilities are cared for by the facility staff. For residents living independently, t he City provides grants and loans to low- and moderate- income individuals with disabilities for accessibility modifications to single-family homes and assistance to renters with disabilities.

Disproportionate Housing Need and Displacement
Risk
“Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: Guidance for All Public Entities and for Housing Elements,” published by HCD in April, 2021, defines “disproportionate housing needs ” as “a condition in which there are significant disparities in the proportion of members of a protected class experiencing a category of housing needs when compared to the proportion of a member of any other relevant groups or the total population experiencing the category of housing need in the applicable geographic area.” The analysis is completed by assessing cost burden, severe cost burden, overcrowding, and substandard housing. Many housing problems, such as housing overpayment or overcrowded housing, are directly related to the cost of housing in a community.

If housing costs are high relative to household income, a correspondingly high prevalence of housing problems occurs. This section evaluates the disproportionate housing need and displacement risk.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-14
Overpayment
According to HUD, any housing condition where a household spends more than 30% of income on housing is considered overpayment. A cost burden of 30% to 50% of income is considered moderate overpayment; payment in excess of 50% of income is considered severe overpayment. Cost burden is an important housing issue because paying too much for housing leaves less money available for basic necessities and emergency expenditures.

Cost Burden among Renters
According to the 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 55% of renter households in the County have a rent burden greater than 30% of their income. In 26 of the City’s 43 block groups, that share of renter households is even greater. As shown on Figure B-19, the highest concentrations of renters with a cost burden are in the West City Planning Area, along I-15 near Victorville’s northeastern City boundary, and in the East Bear Valley Planning Area. These areas include four block groups in which more than 80% of renters have a rent burden. There are census block groups scattered throughout the High Desert with similarly high levels of renters experiencing a cost burden, including in each neighboring jurisdiction. The highest level of rent-burdened households is in an unincorporated area southwest of the City that includes the Oak Hills community. 2006-2010 ACS 5-Year Estimates were used to compare the change in rent burden over time. More block groups in the City have a high share of renters with a rent burden than in 2010.

The prevalence and geographic spread of high shares of r ent-burdened households highlights the importance of developing more affordable housing throughout the C ity to provide more housing opportunities for residents in lower -income households . Affordable housing development will reduce the risk of lower-income residents being displaced due to an inability to afford their home. The City seeks to address this need with many of its proposed programs, most notably Proposed Programs PP -A.1, PP-A.3, PP-A.4, PP-B.1, PP-C.3, PP-F.1, PP-F.2, PP-F.3, PP-F.4, PP-F.5, PP-H.2, PP-H.3, and PP-I.8. More multifamily development in general will provide more housing choice for tenants using housing choice vouchers . The City will continue to refer residents interested in housing choice vouchers to San Bernardino County so renters can have access to affordable housing (EP E.1: Housing Choice Vouchers).

Chapter 2 of the Housing Element uses the Southern California Association of Governments pre-certified data that includes information from HUD on the number of households in the City who pay 30% or more of their gross income on housing costs. More specifically, 60% of the City’s 15,024 renter households spend 30% or more of gross income on housing costs .

Additionally, 32% of renter households experience a severe housing cost burden (i.e., more than 50% of gross income spent on rent) as illustrated o n Figure 2-20 in Chapter 2 of the Housing Element. According to the 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates, renter households are more likely than owner-occupied households to experience housing cost burden.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-15
Cost Burden among Owners
According to the 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates, approximately 55% of housing units in the City are owner occupied. Housing cost burden is less severe for homeowners in the City than in the County. Countywide, 38% of owner-occupied households with a mortgage have a cost burden greater than 30% of their gross income. There are only five block groups within the City in which a higher share of owner-occupied households experience a cost burden. These block groups are spread through the Baldy Mesa, Central City, Golden Triangle, and West Bear Valley Planning Areas, as shown on Figure B-20. Similar or higher shares of owners experience a cost burden in many census block groups within the City’s neighboring jurisdictions. Citywide, only 37% of owner- occupied households have a cost burden, indicative of the City’s supply of relatively affordable ownership housing options. In many areas, cost burden among owner households is less common than it was in 2010. Despite the relative affordability of homeownership opportunities in the City, Proposed Programs PP-C.2, PP-C.3, PP-K.1, PP-L.1, PP-L.2, and PP -L.3 will support further expansion of the availability and affordability of the City’s homeownership opportunities.

Overcrowding
Some households may not be able to accommodate high cost burdens for housing but may instead accept smaller housing or reside with other individuals or families in the same home.

Potential fair housing issues emerge if non- traditional households are discouraged or denied housing due to a perception of overcrowding.

According to the AI, household overcrowding is reflective of various living situations:
• (1) a family lives in a home that is too small,
• (2) a family chooses to house extended family members, or • (3) unrelated individuals or families are doubling up to afford housing.

Not only is overcrowding a potential fair housing concern, but it can also strain physical facilities and the delivery of public services, reduce the quality of the physical environment, contribute to a shortage of parking, and accelerate the deterioration of homes.

As described in Chapter 2 of the Housing Element, overcrowding is not a significant problem in the City relative to the Southern California region, with 10% of the total housing units in the City living in overcrowded situations. Throughout the Southern California Associations of Governments area, 10% of households are overcrowded. More specifically in the City, the 2014- 2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates indicate that 1,444 homeowner and 2,009 renter households had more than 1.0 occupants per room. Of these households, 253 homeowner households and 535 renter households (a combined 2% of all City households , compared to 4% in the Southern

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-16
California Associations of Governments area) had more than 1.5 occupants per room, which meets the ACS definition of “severe overcrowding” (Figure 2-26 in Chapter 2).

Figure B-21 shows that overcrowding and/or severe overcrowding are more common relative to the County in the West City, Central City, West Be ar Valley, SCLA, and Old Town planning areas, as well as in portions of Hesperia and Adelanto adjacent to the City. Even in these areas, however, overcrowding and severe overcrowding are generally less prevalent than in the Southern California region as a whole. Because overcrowding is not a relatively significant problem locally, the City is not pursuing any programs specifically aimed at reducing overcrowding. City staff expects that development of the sites in the site inventory will generally constrain or reduce overcrowding.

Housing Conditions
As discussed in Chapter 2, according to City records, the City opened 799 code enforcement cases between July 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, related to substandard or unsafe housing conditions. Substandard housing issues can include structural hazards, poor construction, faulty wiring or plumbing, fire hazards, and inadequate sanitation or facilities for living. The 2014–2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates indicate the following on substandard housing issues in the City:
• 500 units lack telephone service,
• 124 units have inadequate plumbing, and
• 292 units lack a complete kitchen.

Given the relatively young age of the housing stock, the number of substandard housing units is limited. The City rigorously pursues code enforcement and housing rehabilitation programs to improve and maintain the housing stock.

The City will assist homeowners to identify and apply for rehabilitation funding, to expand code enforcement efforts if necessary, and to provide safe housing conditions educ ation (PP-D.4, Assist Residents with Extremely Low, Very Low, and Low Incomes; PP- D.5, Advertise Rehabilitation Programs ; PP-O.1, Enforce Existing Building and Safety Code; PP -O.2, Safe Housing Conditions Education).

Displacement Risk
The Urban Displacemen t Project (UDP) is a research and action initiative of U niversity of California, Berkeley that conducts community-centered, data-driven, applied research toward more equitable and inclusive futures for cities. Their research aims to understand and describe the nature of gentrification, displacement, and exclusion and to generate knowledge on how policy interventions and investment can respond and support development that is more equitable.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-17
The UDP defines “residential displacement” as “the process by which a household is forced to move from its residence – or is prevented from moving into a neighborhood that was previously accessible to them because of conditions beyond their control.” As part of this research project, the UDP has an interactive map that display changes in neighborhood characteristics that may indicate displacement.

The UDP identifie s sensitive communities as those that have neighborhoods with a high proportion of residents vulnerable to displacement in the case of rising housing costs and market-based displacement pressures present in and/or near the community. Census tracts in the East Bear Valley, Central City, and parts of West Bear Valley Planning Areas are labeled as vulnerable to displacement by the UDP.

Enforcement and Outreach Capacity
The City reviews its zoning laws and policies on an ongoing basis to ensure compliance with fair housing requirements. Regular reviews of policies and practices ensure that, as the City grows and changes, all people have access to sound and affordable ho using. Housing Element Goal 8, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, and corresponding policies and programs have been included in Chapter 7, Housing Plan, of the Housing Element to promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities throughout the community for all people regardless of age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, and genetic information.

The City will continue to promote fair housing through its laws, policies, and programs and to make fair housing information available to tenants, homebuyers, property owners, and landlords.

Fair housing issues that may arise include but are not limited to the following:
• Housing design that make a dwelling unit inaccessible to an individual with a disability, • Discrimination against race, national origin, familial status, disability, religion, or sex when renting or selling a housing unit, and
• Addressing housing needs disproportionately across the City.

Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board
The Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) is a California-based fair housing agency that serves the City. The IFHMB’s office is in Ontario, and its staff can be reached via email or via a phone number set up for residents to use if they experience housing discrimination. The IFHMB provides the following fair housing related services:

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-18
• Owner/tenant mediation.
• The Fair Housing Department provides information, investigation, education, conciliation, and/or referral of housing discrimination complaints.
• Pre-litigation mediation services.
• The agency’s Mobile Home mediators offer specialized problem solving based on Mobile Home Residency Law that reflects the dual ownership and unique life style of the Mobile Home community. In -park workshops are also available for education on rights and responsibilities and understanding of the Mobile Home Residency Law. • The Senior Services Department actively mediates conflicts between seniors and Social Security, Medi-Cal, utility companies, collection agencies, neighbors, and other parties in dispute. A Care Referral Service, such as personal care, housekeeping, transportation, shopping, and home maintenance, is available. The a gency also provides Homeowner/Renter Assistance. A list of senior housing and board and care homes is maintained and available. The agency also distributes a monthly West End Newsletter for seniors, which provides information, referrals, and monthly trips and tours for those who enjoy traveling.
• Mortgage default counseling.
• First-time homebuyer education.
• Pre-purchase counseling.
• Reverse equity mortgage counseling.

The Outreach D epartment actively engages community meetings, high schools, colleges, English as a Second Language (ESL) participants, r ealtors, and all other parties interested in learning how to avoid housing discrimination and the corresponding rights and responsibilities.

During the 5 th Cycle Housing Element cycle period (2013–2021), the IFHMB receive d 360 complaints and provided direct client services to the City’s residents, landlords, property owners, real estate professionals , and property seekers. Approximately 64% were resolved by the IFHMB by phone or correspondence without referral to another agency. In most cases, residents were informed of the law, the civil code, and available remedies for their particular question or issue, with 128, or 36%, conciliated by the IFHMB. Table B-4 shows the number of complaints the IFHMB received for each protected class.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-19
Table B-4. Complaints Received by IFHMB (2013–2021)
PROTECTED CLASS NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS % OF TOTAL COMPLAINTS Race 52 14.4%
Disability 244 67.8%
Familial Status 11 3.1%
Sex 19 5.3%
National Origin 6 1.7%
Color 3 0.8%
Religion 1 0.3%
Sexual Orientation 2 0.6%
Marital Status 0 0.0%
Source of Income 9 2.5%
Arbitrary 9 2.5%
Age 4 1.1%
Total 360 100%
Note: Percentages total slightly more than 100% due to rounding.

Department of Fair Employment and Housing
The mission of the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is to protect Californians from employment, housing and public accommodation discrimination, and hate violence. To achieve this mission, the DFEH keeps track of and investigates complaints of housing discrimi nation and complaints in the areas of employment, housing, public accommodations, and hate violence.

During the prior 5th Cycle Housing Element period, a total of two fair housing complaints in the City have been filed with the DFEH. One of these complaint s involved sexual orientation, and the other was classified as “arbitrary”.

Housing and Urban Development
HUD maintains a record of all housing discrimination complaints for the City. According to the HUD website, any person who feels their housing rights have been violated may submit a complaint to HUD via phone, mail, email, and with FHEO online in English or Spanish. These grievances can be filed based on race, color, national origin, sex, disability, religion, or familial status (Table B-5).

Table B-5. Basis for Discrimination of Cases Filed with HUD (2013–2021) PROTECTED CLASS NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS % OF TOTAL COMPLAINTS Race 2 25%
Color 0 0%
National Origin 0 0%
Sex 1 12.4%
Disability 4 50%
Col Religion 0 0%
Familial Status 0 0%
Retaliation 0 0%
Arbitrary 1 12.5%
Total 8 100%

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-20
Local Data and Knowledge
History
The City of Victorville incorporated in 1962 and development patterns were focused around the development of the City’s railroad facility in Old Town Victorville and Route 66 in the late 1800s and early 1900s and George Air Force Base in the 1940’s. The largest period of growth in Victorville occurred in the early to mid-2000s – 1/3 of the City’s housing stock was built during time period. In fact, 80% of the housing stock in the City was built from 1980 to the present time. The majority of housing developed since 1980 has been planned unit development or master planned communities. Demographic data since 2000 indicates that the Hispanic or Latino population has grown from 33% in 2000 to 55% in 2018, while the Non-Hispanic White population has decreased from 47% in 2000 to 22% in 2018.
2015 Apple Valley/Victorville Consortium Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI)
The 2015 AI looked at the City’s overall lending patterns. The availability of financing affects a person’s ability to purchase or improve a home. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosur e Act (HMDA), lending institutions are required to disclose information on the disposition of loan applications by the income, gender, and race of the applicants. This applies to all loan applications for home purchases, improvements and refinancing, whether financed at market rate or w ith government assistance.

HMDA data is submitted by lending institutions to the FFIEC. Certain data is available to the public via the FFIEC site either in raw data format or as pre-set printed reports. The analyses of HMDA data presented in the AI were conducted using Lending Patterns TM. Lending Patterns is a web- based data exploration tool that analyzes lending records to produce reports on various aspects of mortgage lending. It analyzes HMDA data to assess market share, approval rates, denial rates, low/moderate income lending, and high-cost lending, among other aspects.

For this AI report, the HMDA data for Victorville was compiled by census tract and aggregated to the area that generally approximates the boundaries of the two jurisdictions. Utilizing Lending Patterns, this AI reviews fair lending statistics (such as spread disparities and denial disparities) by race/ethnicity, by lender, and in low/moderate income areas, as well as in minority concentration areas.

Home Purchase Loans
In 2010, a total of 1,118 households applied for conventional home purchase loans. This reflects an 86 percent decline for Victorville from 2007 lending activity. The substantial decrease in lending activity is reflective of lending patterns throughout the country. Housing prices, both in the region and nationwide, peaked in 2006 and 2007 marked the start of the housing market’s steep decline.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-21
Mortgage lending in 2007, while not as vigorous as in the previous year, was still active. However, in the following years lending activity slowed down dramatically to match the lack of activity in the housing market.

The overall approval rate in 2010 for conventional home purchase loans was 69 percent and 18 percent were denied. This reflects a significant increase from 2007, when just 59 percent of applications were approved in Victorville. When the housing market began to show signs of collapse and foreclosures were on the rise, many financial institutions instituted stricter approval criteria for potential borrowers, which should have cause approval rates to drop somewhat. However, the applicant pool for mortgage lending in recent year s has also become smaller and increasingly selective. These applicants have generally been in much better shape financially then applicants from earlier in the decade, when the housing bubble attracted a wider range of potential borrowers.

Generally, two types of home purchase loans are tracked— conventional home purchase loans and government-backed home purchase loans. In a conventional loan, the lender takes on the risk of losing money in the event a borrower defaults on a mortgage. For government -backed loans, the loan is insured, either completely or partially, by the government. The government does not provide the loan itself, but instead promises to repay some or all of the money in the event a borrower defaults. This reduces the risk for the lender when making a loan.

Government-backed loans have more lenient credit score requirements, lower down payment requirements, and are available to those with recent bankruptcies. However, these loans may also carry higher interest rates and most require homebuyer s to purchase mortgage insurance.

Furthermore, government-backed loans have strict limits on the amount a homebuyer can borrow for the purchase of a home. In competitive and high- end housing markets, many of the homes available for purchase exceed the maximum allowable loan amount, making government-backed loans much less popular. The relatively lower cost housing market in Victorville, however, has made government-backed loans a feasible and practical option for homebuyers in the region.

In Victorville, th e number of applications for government -backed home purchase loans considerably surpassed the number of applications for conventional home purchase loans in 2010.

Approximately 2,611 home purchase applications were submitted through government -backed loans (for example, FHA, VA). Approval rates were similar to those for conventional home purchase loans. For Victorville, 69 percent of government -backed loan applications were approved. In 2007, government- backed home loans made up a considerably smaller proportion of total lending activity for both jurisdictions. Victorville residents filed 345 applications for government-backed home purchase loans. During this time, conventional home purchase applications overwhelmingly outnumbered applications for governm ent-backed loans for both jurisdictions. Since 2007, however, the increasingly stringent credit and down payment requirements for conventional purchase loans have caused potential borrowers to turn more

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-22
towards government-backed loans, where lending criteria is typically less strict. About 65 percent of applications for government-backed loans were approved in Victorville.

Home Improvement Loans
Reinvestment in the form of home improvement is critical to maintaining the supply of safe and adequate housing. Historically, home improvement loan applications have a higher rate of denial when compared to home purchase loans. Part of the reason is that an applicant’s debt-to- income ratio may exceed underwriting guidelines when the first mortgage is considered wit h consumer credit balances. Another reason is that many lenders use the home improvement category to report both second mortgages and equity-based lines of credit, even if the applicant’s intent is to do something other than improve the home (e.g., pay for a wedding or college). Loans that will not be used to improve the home are viewed less favorably since the owner is divesting in the property by withdrawing accumulated wealth. From a lender’s point of view, the reduction in owner’s equity represents a higher risk.

In 2010, 162 applications for home improvement loans were received in Victorville. Approximately 39 percent of applications from Victorville were approved, and about one-half of the applications were denied.

Home improvement financing, like home purchase lending and mortgage refinancing, was much more active in 2007. Victorville residents filed 15 times as many applications (2,431 applications) during 2007 than they did in 2010. Approval rates for this type of loan also decreased between 2007 and 2010, 41 percent of home improvement loan applications were approved in 2007.

Refinancing
Homebuyers will often refinance existing home loans for a number of reasons. Refinancing can allow homebuyers to take advantage of better interest rates, consolidate multiple debts into one loan, reduce monthly payments, alter risk (i.e. by switching from variable rate to fixed rate loans), or free up cash and capital. A substantial proportion of loan applications submitted in Victorville in 2010 were for refinancing existing home loans (1,703 applications). About 55 percent of refinance applications were approved and 24 percent were denied.

Refinance lending was much more active in 2007. The housing market peaked in 2006 and many households purchased homes during peak using adjustable rates and loans with low interest rates only for a short term. With the upward trending of adjustable rates and the expiration of the short- term low-interest loans, many households sought refinancing. In Victorville, 13,574 applications for refinancing were filed, nearly eight times more than the number of applications in 2010 but with lower approval rates. With the bursting of the “housing bubble” in 2006, many households were facing high housing payments and declining home value. Refinancing was far more difficult than they were led to believe when purchasing the home.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-23
At the time that the AI was prepared, refinancing was substantially more difficult than it had been in the past. Financial institutions had established much stricter requir ements for mortgage refinancing, making it harder for homeowners to qualify for a refinance loan. Even homeowners who had excellent credit and a low debt-to-income ratio faced obstacles to refinancing, such as a lack of home equity. Some homeowners had little or no equity because they bought their property with minimal down payments; alternatively, many homeowners who had equity have watched it erode because of decreasing home values at the time. As a result, fewer households would qualify for refinancing. In response, federal legislation was passed to require lenders to work with homeowners to pursue loan modifications.

Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Income Level
The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in mortgage lending based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status or handicap (disability). It is, therefore, important to look not just at overall approval and denial rates for a jurisdiction, but also whether or not these rates vary by other factors, such as race/ethnicity. An analysis of lending patterns for different races/ethnicities of the same income levels can help reveal patterns not discernible when analyzing lending data by race or income separately.

In Victorville, the rate at which applications were wit hdrawn and incomplete was relatively consistent across all races/ethnicities and income levels in 2010. Asian applicants in 2007, however, did experience noticeably higher rates of fallout than all other racial/ethnic groups.

In 2010, Asian applicants in Victorville had the highest approval rates, while Black applicants had the lowest approval rates. Generally, approval rates for Black applicants were about 10 points lower than for White and Asian applicants in both 2007 and 2010. Approval rates for Hispani cs applicants have increased since 2007, and by 2010, approval rates for Hispanics were comparable to the approval rates for Whites. While Whites did not have the highest approval rates in 2010, they were the least likely to be denied loans. Denial rates for White applicants were notably lower than for all other race/ethnic groups across all income categories.

While this analysis provides a more in- depth look at lending patterns, it does not conclusively explain any of the discrepancies observed. Aside from income, many other factors can contribute to the availability of financing, including credit history, the availability and amount of a down payment, and knowledge of the home buying process. HMDA data does not provide insight into these other factors.

Subprime Lending
According to the Federal Reserve, “prime” mortgages are offered to persons with excellent credit and employment history and income adequate to support the loan amount. “Subprime” loans are loans to borrowers who have less-than-perfect credit history, poor employment history, or other factors such as limited income. By providing loans to those who do not meet the critical standards

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-24
for borrowers in the prime market, subprime lending can and does serve a critical role in increasing levels of homeownership. Households that are interested in buying a home but have blemishes in their credit record, insufficient credit history, or non-traditional income sources, may be otherwise unable to purchase a home. The subprime loan market offers these borrowers opportunities to obtain loans that they would be unable to realize in the prime loan market.

Subprime lenders generally offer interest rates that are higher than those in the prime market and often lack the regulatory oversight required for prime lender s because they are not owned by regulated financial institutions. In the recent past, however, many large and well -known banks became involved in the subprime market either through acquisitions of other firms or by initiating subprime loans directly. Though the subprime market usually follows the same guiding principles as the prime market, a number of specific risk factors are associated with this market. According to a joint HUD/Department of the Treasury report, subprime lending generally has the foll owing characteristics:
• Higher Risk: Lenders experience higher loan defaults and losses by subprime borrowers than by prime borrowers.
• Lower Loan Amounts: On average, loans in the subprime mortgage market are smaller than loans in the prime market.
• Higher Costs to Originate: Subprime loans may be more costly to originate than prime loans since they often require additional review of credit history, a higher rate of rejected or withdrawn applications and fixed costs such as appraisals, that represent a higher percentage of a smaller loan.
• Faster Prepayments: Subprime mortgages tend to be prepaid at a much faster rate than prime mortgages.
• Higher Fees: Subprime loans tend to have significantly higher fees due to the factors listed above.

Subprime lending can both impede and extend fair housing choice. On the one hand, subprime loans extend credit to borrowers who potentially could not otherwise finance housing. The increased access to credit by previously underserved consumers and communities contributed to record high levels of homeownership among minorities and lower income groups. On the other hand, these loans left many lower income and minority borrowers exposed to default and foreclosure risk. Since foreclosures destabilize neighborhoods and subprime borrowers are often from lower income and minority areas, mounting evidence suggests that classes protected by fair housing faced the brunt of the recent subprime and mortgage lending market collapse.

In Victorville, 32 percent of Black applicants received a subprime loan in 2007. Hispanics in Victorville fared a bit better— about 29 percent of Hispanic applicants received a subprime loan—

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-25
but not as well as White and Asian applicants who received the lowest proportion of subprime loans.
2016 Apple Valley/Victorville Consortium Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) The City conducted an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) in 2016. The City analyzed R/ECAP’s and identified the following contributing factors: Lack of Community Revitalization Strategies, Private and Public Investments and Regional Cooperation, Deteriorated and abandoned properties and Type of Affordable Housing (availability, size and unit type).

The AFH analysis of Disparities in Access to Opportunities revealed low indexes for opportunities in education, employment, transportation, and exposure to poverty. This means that opportunities for groups within protected classes encounter barriers and are unable to progress. For instance, in assessing employment opportunities indicators by race/ethnicity and labor market index in the HUD provided data indicate that the highest opportunity is available to Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic with an indicator of 17.49 following White, Non-Hispanic at 16.12. A person’s place of residence is correlated to the opportunities they have in obtaining employment and proximity thereto. Therefore, because a high percentage of Victorville residents commute to other cities within the San Bernardino County and other surrounding areas indexes for this category are low.

As a result, this also causes a person’s transportation cost to increase.

Additionally, the City’s AFH assessment of the HUD provided data depicted disparities in access to educational are near lower performing schools, Victorville’s index appeared below average school proficiency. The data suggest that among all races/ethnicity in close proximity to proficient schools, Asian or Pacific Islander, Non- Hispanic scored the lowest at 32.52 and the highest, Native American, Non-Hispanic at 37.54. Values ranged from 0 – 99 max, with the average being 49.

Based on the low indexes for Disparities in Access to Opportunities, the City listed several goals and priorities to lessen the contributing factors. Although the majority of the goals were long term, ranging from 10 – 30 years, short and continuous efforts will be made that include developing and expanding partnerships with school districts and related agencies to strategize and possibly align goals and objectives that create opportunities within these categories.

Contributing Factors identified for Disproportionate Housing Needs include similar factors as referenced in previous sections. The HUD based data and maps appear to indicate that the Black non-Hispanic population experiences a higher rate of housing cost burden. At the time of the assessment, the area located in Census Tract 99.08 significantly experienced a housing burden.

These households experience any four housing issues that include incomplete kitchen and plumbing facilities, overcrowding, or severe housing burden, which have housing cost greater than 50% of the household’s income. For these contributing factors, the City has included short and long-term goals. One ongoing activity to alleviate the disproportionate housing is to continue housing programs such as the Senior Home Repair and Mortgage Assistance Programs.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-26
Publicly Supported Housing was also limited in the City of Victorville resulting in several contributing factors. Because of the limitations to access to publicly supported housing, many residents remained on waiting list to receive housing choice voucher assistance or access to other multifamily assisted housing, additionally; these units were not located within the City’s R/ECAP area. The City set a short term goal to collaborate with Regional and affordable housing agencies to create subsidized housing and reduce displacement pressures, assess the possibility of extending affordability restrictions on subsidized units that will be soon expiring, and promote housing choice city-wide. To supplement these activities, outreach, education and enforcement of local private fair housing laws was be encouraged and supported through collaboration with fair housing agencies and organizations.

Opportunities for persons with disability were limited in the areas of housing (in-home, assistance to housing accessibility modi fications, ADA accessible housing, and admissions to publicly supported housing), access to proficient schools, employment, and transportation. Although these opportunities are limited to other groups within protected characteristics, disabled persons face additional barriers. As a result to limited resources, the City prioritized the financing of its Senior Home Repair Program to further assist persons with disabilities address ADA accessible modifications or repairs. In addition, and as a part of the AFH, the City anticipated collaborating with non-profit agencies to address the needs the housing needs of persons with disabilities, provide and expand opportunities to proficient schools and employers. Although these were long- term goals, prioritization in alleviating these barriers was addressed in the AFH.

Community Workshops Summary
The AFH assessment included a community participation process. A community meeting was held in July 2016 to glean local input and knowledge from residents of the City, including fair housing issues and concerns. The community meeting was structured in the following format:
participants were introduced to the Con Plan and AFH (AFH) plan process through a presentation and then asked to discuss a series of questions related to housing and community development needs, their presumptions regarding areas considered segregated and/or challenged by poverty, including fair housing issues and concerns. The following are a summary of key issues were identified in comments of the AFH meetings:

Community Survey Summaries
In addition to the meetings, a Fair Housing Survey was also created. A thirty-question survey was disseminated through multi-channel methods to seek responses from members of the public who may be harder to reach by methods of face- to-face contact at events in the community or were possibly not interested in attending a community meeting. The Fair Housing Survey sought to gain knowledge about the nature and extent of fair housing issues experienced by Victorville residents as well as their opinions concerning the existence, or lack of, racially/ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, or areas deemed as disadvantaged within the Jurisdictions. The survey questions were also designed to gather information on a person’s experience with fair housing issues and

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-27
perception of fair housing issues in his/her neighborhood. The survey and flyers were available in English and Spanish, and distributed via the following methods:
• Survey made available in online format via survey monkey. • Hard copy information flyers and surveys placed at various community locations and public counters.
• Posted on Victorville’s municipal website.
• Solicited the participation of service providers and stakeholders via mass emails to also make the survey flyer, with survey web address and information on the community meetings, available in their offices and to distribute the information to their clients and other members of the community they felt would be receptive and responsive. • Surveys were solicited at a Homebuyers Resource Fair that was held on Saturday, June 4, 2016 at the San Bernardino County Fairgrounds. This event was in partnership between the High Desert Association of REALTORS® and First District Supervisor, Robert A Lovingood, County of San Bernardino.

Stakeholder Meetings Summary
Three stakeholder meetings were held in August 2016 – all in Victorville, with staff present. The stakeholder meetings were also held to discuss priority housing and community development needs in the respective Jurisdictions, including fair housing issues and concerns. Each stakeholder workshop was structured in the same format: participants were introduced to the AFH plan process by staff and then asked to discuss a series of questions related to housing and community development needs, including fair housing issues and concerns.

A comprehensive summary of housing-related issues identified by submitted surveys, community meetings, and workshops held, is found below.

Homelessness
Homelessness was one of the primary issues discussed by participants at the Victorville meeting.

Participants noted the lack of Homeless Shelters in the High Desert. There is just one in Victorville that serves a sphere of influence of approximately 500,000 residents. The High Desert is subject to extreme temperatures that can result in dangerous conditions for homeless persons. Most homeless services are located “down the hill” in the City of Sa n Bernardino, or other southern jurisdictions, creating a disparity in services available between the High Desert and the surrounding region.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-28
Affordable Housing, Senior Housing, Reasonable Accommodation for Disabled Persons and Youth
Though segregation was not identified as an issue through various means of community contact, housing in general was still identified as a major need discussed by participants at the meetings.

Community members were primarily concerned about housing affordability and availabili ty for seniors, the disabled and youth. Participants discussed the housing needs of seniors with limited income, and the condition of existing housing; in particular about existing unmaintained rental apartments. A stakeholder noted that location of the most affordable housing has that to offer, but very little, in terms of amenities, are available within walking distance to some of the poorest neighborhoods in the High Desert. Access to transit, grocery stores, recreation services and safety were expressed as some of the services or opportunities that people must give up in order to live in an area that is affordable enough for their household.

Neighborhoods
Participants stated the importance of crime- free, safe neighborhoods. The importance of maintaining a safe, well-maintained community was emphasized at the meetings. If a community is safe and there are places for people to go (commercial and community-based), then residents will tend to remain in the community instead of seeking a way out. Non- reporting of crime was noted on several occasions as a barrier to an undesirable neighborhood being able to rebound.

Whether actual or perceived fear of retaliation prevents crime reporting, the effects can be detrimental to a neighborhood if it becomes known for unresolved crime activity.

Transportation
Many participants expressed their concerns as to the lack of transportation available throughout the High Desert. Participants communicated how many low -income families and people in the City of Victorville areas struggle to find reliable transportation. The result is missed appointments and poor illness management, even when care is readily available. Some households do not have a vehicle, or share one among multiple family members, and for those who are disabled, obese, or chronically ill, riding the bus can be a difficult undertaking. As a result, some people may find themselves without a way home after an emergency trip to the hospital; miss opportunities to schools, family or community events or simply miss a doctor’s appointment because they do not have a way to get there.

During the community participation process, all comments and views were considered and have been incorporated into this AFH. No comments were considered as immaterial or insignificant.

Economic Development
Lack of sufficient local employment in career level employment sectors continues to be an impediment to the local community and economy

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-29
Education
Lack of an educated work force continues to be an impediment to business attraction and employment opportunities.

During the last Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI), Victorville experienced impediments that continued to impact the City at the time of the Fair Housing Assessment. The impediments and strategies, at the time of the assessment, on how to reduce their impacts, and accomplishments are listed below:

Housing Discrimination
Housing Discrimination towards disability, race, and familial status has been a reoccurring issue. As a continued service, the City elected to continue contract services with Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB). IFHMB provides fair housing services to residents, landlords, and other housing professionals. Available services, newsletters, and special event flyers are routinely posted on the City’s website. In addition, the City assisted in promoting special events by distributing informational pamphlets and flyers throughout public- owned buildings. In July 2016, the City of Victorville hosted and participated in a special workshop held by IFHMB to educate and assist tenants, property owners and other housing professionals on fair housing issues specifically for persons with disabilities. Discussion involved fair housing laws, introduction to the affirmatively furthering fair housing final ruling and requirements, reasonable accommodations or modification request allowable fees associated with reasonable accommodation or modification request. The event was highly successful, many interested persons, property owners and tenants attended. Persons who attended expressed their gratitude for the event. Their questions and concerns were addressed and real estate professionals felt they were more educated on how to assist persons with disabilities, particularly in providing reasonable accommodations.

IFHMB receives CDBG funding to provide residents with fair housing and landlord tenant mediation service and assistance. Along with these services, IFHMB assists the City of Victorville with its first -time homebuyer program, Mortgage Assistance Program (MA) b y providing homebuyer education and certification. Persons who receive their homebuyer education course by IFHMB receive information and training in the complete process of purchasing a home, budgeting, credit, mortgage loans, and how to keep your home. On behalf of the communities, IFHMB distributes fair housing materials, holds workshops on fair housing throughout the High Desert and San Bernardino County. IFHMB’s services have assisted an array of residents within the Communities. Many of which have received ‘one-on-one’ assistance in assisting homeowners who are at risk of losing their home by exploring many available options including loan modification, special forbearance, partial claims, loan repayment plans, loan reinstate plans, short sale options including the Homeowner Assistance Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA), and the Homeowner Assistance Refinance Program.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-30
In addition to the above accomplishments, the City actively promoted the National Fair Housing Month held in April of each year, and posted HU D created posters and flyers throughout city hall, city website and social media outlets celebrating the National Fair Housing month.

Public Outreach
Public Outreach is a concern that needs to be addressed. Many residents, landlords and tenants are not aware of fair housing rights and services available. When encountered with fair housing issues, many do not believe reporting the incidents would help the situation. Some are also afraid of retaliation by the landlord. With this in mind, some of the adopted strategies were to (1) provide fair housing outreach and education services that will include, but not be limited to at least one of the following components: press releases, public service announcements, cable TV, radio, and newspaper outreach, updates in newsletters and/or other publications, events at the annual fair housing celebration, organized meetings or events relating to fair housing, and participation in community events such as fairs and trade shows; (2) initiate half-day fair housing workshops at City Hall annually, targeting residents, landlords, disadvantaged groups, and housing professionals; (3) outreach and education specifically for housing providers (i.e., landlords, property managers, realtors, lending institutions, and managers of publi c housing); (4) workshops to assist elected and appointed officials of each jurisdiction; and the general public..

The City also utilizes its City -owned electronic message board located on the east side of Interstate-15 to make public service announcements (PSA). The City routinely promotes PSA for non-profits, such as the High Desert Association of Realtors ® and special County of San
Bernardino events, etc.

Housing Choice Vouchers and Affordable Housing Units
Housing Choice Vouchers and Affordable Housing Units are limited resources to Hispanic households. Because many residents have been on the Housing Authority of County of San Bernardino’s (HACSB) waiting lists for choice vouchers for several years in hopes of qualifying for the Housing Choice Voucher program, HACSB has closed its ability to provide additional vouchers to new households who may reflect the current demographic profile of the City.

Although these choice voucher resources are limited, HACSB provides other affordable housing opportunities through other affordable housing developments it maintains. Currently, HACSB has an open waiting list. Additionally, the City of Victorville also provides financial assistance to facilitate the construction of affordable housing. These affordable housing complexes are privately owned, but contain affordable housing covenants to secure housing for very low and low-income households for several years. In support of HACSB’s efforts, the City will continue efforts in petitioning for additional voucher assistance from HUD. The City promotes any and all available resources to households in need. When opportunities arise, the City attempts to require rental property owners receiving financial assistance from the City to affirm their commitment to comply with fair housing laws, and attend fair housing training.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-31
Housing for Persons with Disabilities
Accessible housing units and other housing options (such as transitional and supportive housing) for persons with disabilities are limited in supply. In a recent study car ried out by IFHMB, the majority of discrimination indicated this issue increase. In past AI’s, the City amended their Zoning Code to establish either a Reasonable Accommodation procedure. The City anticipates it will increase its efforts in awareness and training to further assist persons with disabilities with fair housing rights. Additionally, IFHMB has assisted residents with fair housing mediation services concerning reasonable accommodations.

Lending Practices
Overall, minority households in Victorville rely more heavily on smaller, lesser-known lenders for mortgage financing, which tend to have more liberal underwriting criteria. While this may promote homeownership to minority households, it may also encourage certain households to overextend financially. Furthermore, most of these lenders do not have local offices, making it so that applicants have to have in-person meetings with the lenders. Black households in general, seem to have more difficulty accessing financing. They experienced lower approval rates than other households in the same income group. Since 2007, the rate spreads for all race/ethnic groups have decreased significantly except for Black households. The rate spread for Black households remained the highest among all groups and actually has increased since 2007.

Among the top lenders, minority households also have high fallout rates (not completing or withdrawing an application). Some actions adopted by the Communities since the last AI are; (1) work with government agencies and nonprofi t groups that provide credit counseling and foreclosure workshops to conduct workshops in the High Desert area; (2) conduct lender workshops to provide outreach, education and encourage increasing pool of lenders participating in the down payment assistanc e programs; (3) continue contract services with IFHMB to monitor lending activities and contact lenders to address potential issues; (4) publicize results of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data review to bring attention to the lending community, housing advocates, and the general public; (5) continue coordinating efforts with minority Chambers of Commerce to promote City and County programs and services, including home buying down payment assistance, credit counseling, foreclosure counseling, etc. The City of Victorville has recently met with real estate professionals in strategizing its marketing efforts to promote its Mortgage Assistance Program (MAP), Senior Home Repair (SHRP) and Owner - occupied Rehabilitation (OOR) Programs. Additionally, the City of Victorville has met with Lenders to conduct “one-on-one” training to ensure their knowledge of the City’s MAP is accurate and lending opportunities are given to all persons equally and fairly. The City anticipates it will launch a large Lender-Real estate professional training workshop in November 2016 to promote equal opportunity to home ownership among the very low , low and moderate- income households. The City anticipates in concentrating its efforts to the Old Town Area where home ownership is low among minorities.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-32
Public Transportation
The Public Transportation System throughout the High Desert Area is limited. Many lower income households, seniors and persons with disabilities have many opportunities to housing resources offered and funded by the County of San Bernardino . However, access difficulties arise as they are dependent on the public transportation system. Many of these residents find that the public transportation system in the High Desert is difficult to navigate through and use.

Therefore, the City has made many efforts to expand public transportation by (1) petitioning to the County of San Bernardino to expand housing programs and services to the High Desert area vs. “down the hill”; (2) provide public transportation maps at public locations (at the time of the assessment, maps of transportation routes are available at City Hall); and (3) include navigating the public transportation system in programs and activities designed for seniors and disabled.

Foreclosures
Victorville has been impacted by the large number of foreclosures. Abandoned and foreclosed homes are often vandalized and trespassed, negatively impacting neighborhood safety and conditions. The lack of maintenance of foreclosed properties is a serious issue expressed by many participants of public meetings conducted as part of this AI. Goals and actions proposed and carried out by the City includes: (1) continue proactive code enforcement activities to address issues associated with abandoned and foreclosed homes; and (2) work with l enders holding the homes to ensure a reasonable level of safety and condition is maintained.

Real Estate Advertising
Previous AI indicated that advertising of for-sale homes and particularly rental listings contained potentially discriminatory language. Often such language encourages or discourages a particular group to inquire about the housing available.

Given the market condition, many homes are being used as rentals. Owners of these units may not be professional landlords and therefore are not familiar with fair housing rights and responsibilities. Some actions taken by the Consortium includes: (1) continued contract services with IFHMB to monitor the advertising of for-sale and for-rent units; and (2) publicize fair housing rights and responsibilities on City websites, newsletters, or other publications as a way of outreaching to landlords new to the rental business.

Accessibility of Public Facilities
Not all public buildings are accessible to persons with disabilities. Accessible sidewalks with ramps and curb cuts are also needed to allow circulation from one location to another. The City is working on improving accessibility in and to public buildings to facilitate participation in civic decisions by persons with disabilities. Annual evaluations of accessibility improvement needs of public facilities through the Capital Improvement Plan process to identify priority projects for funding have been started.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-33
In October 2015, the City of Victorville City Council approved a Voluntary Compliance Agreement with HUD requiring a Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan that will identify ADA compliance barriers in City programs, activities and facilities. In addition, the Plan would provide with a timeline for completion of modifications to provide equal access. The deadline for the completion of the review and update is 240 days upon execution of the Voluntary Compliance Agreement. The May 2016 deadline has been extended to January 30, 2017. The City acquired the assistance of a firm, Disability Access Consultants (DAC) to assist with the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. Additionally, the City is working with Caltrans in developing an ADA Transition plan for facilities in the public right of way to be eligible to receive federal transportation funds. This plan is currently underway.

Discuss how you have been successful in achieving past goals, and/or how you have fallen short of achieving those goals (including potentially harmful unintended consequences); and The City of Victorville and fair housing service providers have successfully implemented ongoing consultation, education and workshops for the community. Affirmatively furthering fair housing continues to be a priority though recent community surveys have reflected less concern in relation to other priorities than in years past. Past goals and issues are starting points for current and future goals and strategies and included in surveys, questionnaires and community meetings to develop dialogue identify current concerns and plan strategies to be implemented in consolidated plan and annual action plans. The Housing Authority, County of San Bernardino administers affordable housing units in the Victor Valley, which includes Victorville. Affordable units are limited to funding, yet the area is generally more affordabl e at market rates than the regional area. Accessibility to public facilities remains a high priority and improvements continue as funding becomes available.

The City of Victorville has achieved many successes in assisting and maintaining affordable housing to its senior and permanently disabled population. Programs offered by the City, such as the Senior Home Repair (SHRP) and Owner -Occupied Rehabilitation (OOR) Programs has provided residents with opportunities to make eligible repairs to their homes. Many repairs include ADA, health and safety improvements. These residents normally do not have the financial means to make these repairs on their own; therefore, these programs remain in high demand. The City anticipates continuing to fund these programs in f uture years. Additionally, the City is in the process of expanding its programs that will help unrepresented protected classes, such as disabled persons, that are low and very -low income, make necessary repairs and improvements.

Old Town Victorville
Existing development in the Old Town area of the City of Victorville tends to have a pattern of overcrowding and substandard housing stock. The same area includes Census Tract 98, Block Group 2, where 72.5% of the households have an income below the poverty leve l, which is the highest poverty rate in the City. The Old Town area is primarily composed of the oldest housing

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-34
stock within the City, with construction largely dating back prior to the City’s incorporation and regular maintenance, vandalism, and construction methods not to current standards accounting for the majority of the substandard housing issues in the vicinity. This dated housing stock is also relatively small in size in comparison to the remainder of the City, with small lots and small homes but to accommodate historic railroad operations rather than families that currently reside in the area. Given the state of the available housing in Old Town, rents are typically lower than other areas of the City, and overcrowding is a byproduct of the rental rates and housing stock that is undesirable to residents who are not cost burdened by higher rental or home ownership costs.

The Old Town area has also been the subject of multiple revitalization efforts, with a Specific Plan and grant opportunities aimed at spurring development and improving quality of life, as well as potential funding mechanisms in development to provide a means to redeveloped dilapidated structure that will allow for new housing components.

Other Relevant Factors
Other contributions that affect the accumulation of wealth and access to resources include historical disinvestment, lack of infrastructure improvements, and presence of older affordable housing units that may be at risk of conversion to market-rate housing.

Land-Use
The Victorville General Plan and Zoning Ordinance provide for a range of housing types and densities with adequate amounts of available land for development. The City offers varying zoning standards to encourage lower cost housing.

In August 2006, the City of Victorvi lle adopted a Reasonable Accommodation in Housing to Disabled or Handicapped Individuals Ordinance. The purpose of this ordinance was to provide a process for individuals with disabilities to make request for and be provided, reasonable accommodation in th e application of zoning regulations to housing. This ordinance with Fair Housing Laws is administered by the City’s Development Department.

The City of Victorville is currently working towards the Revitalization of Old Town/Midtown Area.

The City invested financial resources to develop and updated the previous Old Town Specific Plan dated April 1995. Revitalization efforts are being considered to address old and unsafe housing stock, crime and blight, outdated and poorly functioning infrastructure, and declining of property values. City staff is currently researching and developing a comprehensive and strategic plan that involves the review of land use to make the Old Town area a way that pedestrian traffic will support retail businesses, increase residential development to support retail business and encourage business development. This will promote integration of compatible land uses; encourage greater recreational use of the existing open space; establish a location for cottage industry, live/work providin g more opportunities for people of lower income and disabilities; and to address the adjacent transit station as a focal point in the Downtown area.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-35
Revitalization of Old Town will consider existing Downtown Development Codes, Capital Improvement, encourage a sales tax sharing program and promote infill housing development.

The goal to revitalize Old Town is to improve safety and provide more opportunities to minorities, such as the Hispanic population that currently resides in Old Town.

Investment Practices in Victorville
Victorville has a long history of utilizing public investment tools for economic revitalization and affordable housing. Victorville’s location has historically presented challenges to establishing a healthy and diverse economy as it had not been considered “centrally located” to Los Angeles.

Victorville utilized Redevelopment (which allows for tax increment financing to fund infrastructure, economic development and affordable housing) extensively with three major redevelopment projects within the City. In the 1990’s when George Air Force Base was ordered closed by the federal government, Victorville and surrounding cities formed a joint powers authority, the Victor Valley Economic Development Agency (or VVEDA), to assist with the economic impacts of the closure. These redevelopment projects had a measurable positive impact on the City and development of retail and housing was significant through the 2000s.

The Great Recession and Redevelopment Dissolution
However, two events had a significant impact on the City. The first was the 2009 financial crisis.

It is important to note that Victorville and the most inland areas of the region suffered the greatest numbers of foreclosures in southern California. The housing development that had been increasing every year and was at historic highs had halted. Housing development has still not reached pre-Recession levels as memories of the Recession impacts in the area are a lingering concern to investors and developers. The second was the eliminat ion of Redevelopment by State Law in 2011. The local investment by the City through Redevelopment ceased at a time when economic recovery from the Recession had not happened. These two events which occurred within 2 years of each other had a profound impact on the local economy and on housing development.

In response, the City utilized the tools that were still available. The Old Town Victorville and Civic Center Specific Plans were adopted to catalyze development in core areas of the City.

Additionally, economic growth and shortages of vacant land in Los Angeles and Orange counties has pushed development further inland over the past 20-30 years, inland cities such as Corona, Ontario and Fontana have become major retail, industrial and affordable housing in southern California. Technological changes and the COVID 19 pandemic have boosted an already evolving e- commerce phenomena and the inland empire is a highly desirable location for ecommerce distribution centers. Additionally, as median home prices in Orange County and Los Angeles are as high as $1,000,000 in some areas, the Inland Empire has experience a significant rise in housing development and is one of the few southern California areas that is still affordable to working people and young families.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-36
Community Revitalization and Investment Area
The City is now working to establish a Community Revitalization and Investment Authority and Area (CRIA) to continue invest in and improve the Old Town area as was the City had intended with the Old Town Specif ic Plan. Once established, the CRIA has the ability to accomplish the following:
• Provide funding for the rehabilitation, repair, upgrading, or construction of infrastructure. • Provide low- and moderate-income housing.
• Remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances.
• Provide funding for seismic retrofits of existing buildings. • Acquire and transfer real property.
• Issue bonds.
• Borrow money, receive grants, or accept financial or other assistance or investment from the state or the federal government or any other public agency or private lending institution for projects.
• Make loans or grants for owners or tenants to improve, rehabilitate, or retrofit buildings or structures.
• Construct foundations, platforms, and other like structural forms necessary for the provision or utilization of air rights sites for buildings to be used for residential, commercial industrial, or other uses contemplated by the revitalization plan. • Provide direct assistance to businesses for new or existing facilities for industrial or manufacturing uses.

The CRIA’s Plan Area, which corresponds to the Old Town Victorville area with slight modifications, is comprised of approximately 400 acres and is located between Interstate 15 and the eastern boundary of the City. The Project Area includes the historic Old Town core, the area north of the railroad tracks, and the 7th Street corridor gateway leading into Old Town.

Overall, the Project Area is experiencing many socioeconomic and physical challenges.

According to the Old Town Specific Plan, ho melessness issues are significant in this portion of the City, with reports of widespread drug and alcohol use, loitering, and even prostitution causing clear safety concerns in the Project Area. Additionally, as businesses have left the area, vacant buildings have been a gathering place for homeless individuals, and a string of fires over the last several years has caused the City to demolish abandoned buildings proactively to prevent potential fires and minimize health and safety risks to the community. Because of these actions,

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-37
former deteriorated and dilapidated structures have been removed, leaving a large number of vacant lots in the area.

Old Town Specific Plan
The Old Town Specific Plan represents a blueprint for growth over the next 20- 30 years. The purpose of the Specific Plan is to serve as a tool for revitalization of the Old Town, presenting an opportunity to transform this district into a unique, vibrant, mixed-use focal point for the region.

This Plan promotes higher -density mixed- use development in the project area to bring new housing opportunities to the Old Town that will accommodate some of the new population growth that is anticipated to occur over the plan period. The Plan encourages new businesses and jobs to locate in Old Town and imple ments standards and guidelines to promote an attractive and pedestrian-oriented Old Town that reflects its historic character.

The project area comprises approximately 428 acres and is located between Interstate 15 and the eastern boundary of the city. The historic Old Town is the core of the project area and also includes the area north of the railroad tracks and the 7th Street corridor gateway leading into Old Town.

Historic Route 66 traverses the project area, leading northeast into town from Interstate 15 and then heading northwest along D Street. The Specific Plan area is organized in a grid network of blocks that orient themselves to 7th and D streets. Most blocks in the project area have mid - block alleyways.

Old Town is characterized by its small lots , compact form, and pedestrian scale. A number of historic buildings, including the Old Victor School, and cultural sites, such as the Route 66 Museum, contribute to the character of Old Town. At the intersection of D and 6th streets is the Victor Valley Transit Center, with a train stop along the Southwest Chief route connecting Los Angeles and Chicago.

The 7th Street corridor leading into the historic Old Town core is characterized by larger blocks, larger parcels, and buildings set back from the street with large surface parking lots adjacent to the sidewalk. It is an environment that prioritizes the car and is not as pleasant for walking as within the old Town core.

The area to the north of the railroad tracks is characterized by a lack of structure. Single -family homes and community uses are scattered amidst a large number of vacant lots. The lack of sidewalks and the numerous empty lots create an inconsistent pedestrian environment.

Tourism presents an important long- term opportunity for Old Town Victor ville. Before tourism can play a significant part in revitalizing Old Town, the required infrastructure to support tourism in the area must be in place. Entertainment, retail, and cultural destinations in Old Town must first be established and effectively marketed to visitors. Local hotels would form an important part of the supporting tourism infrastructure.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-38
Development in the project area will be of a high quality that fosters a sense of place and instills pride in the community. Old Town will be an economically vibrant, walkable destination that is inviting to pedestrians, with a mix of different housing types and uses that serve residents and attract visitors. The 7th Street corridor will be redefined as the main street of Old Town, and the architecture will reflect a contemporary take on the city’s historic Route 66 heritage. (Old Town Plan – Vision)
Programs
The City of Victorville adopted multiple programs in the last Housing Element planning period to encourage more housing development to address the City’s housing needs. However, Victorville understands the need for more housing in the State of California and, therefore, the demand for more rigorous programs that facilitate housing development. Therefore, Victorville has modified past programs and proposed new ones to help achieve the goals of the Housing Element. These programs address housing mobility enhancement, new housing choices and affordability, place- based strategies for community preservation and revitalization, and displacement protection. A complete description of all Housing Element programs and actions is contained in Chapter 7:

Housing Plan, including the specific milestones and tim eframes. The following are some of the programs that were modified or added to address fair housing issues:

Housing Mobility Enhancement, New Housing Choices and Affordability • PP-A.2: Adopt a Density Bonus Ordinance and Create a Menu of Density Bonuses.

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65915, the City will adopt a legally compliant density bonus ordinance. In addition, t he City will identify appropriate density bonus levels to offer to developers in exchange for the provision of certain community benefits and amenities. This program will allow for the development of a greater diversity of housing stock while also attracting private investment in the City’s affordable housing stock, streetscapes, parks and open spaces, and other community benefits as identified and prioritized by City Council.
• PP-A.5: Encourage the Subdivision of Sites that are 10 Acres or Larger. Encouraging the subdivision of sites that are 10 acres or more can provide more opportunities for development of affordable housing, which the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has determined is more feasible on sites between 0.5 and 10 acres in size. During the 5th Cycle period, the City recorded 26 tract maps and approved 27 tentative tract maps. The tentative tract maps, 24 of which were more than 10 acres in size, contributed to the development of more than 5,600 mar ket-rate housing units. The relatively large number of subdivisions demonstrates the outsized role that subdivisions play in local residential development. The City will encourage the subdivision of large lots, particularly for affordable housing, by routi nely giving high priority processing to

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-39
subdivision maps that include affordable housing units. Additionally, the City will consider providing incentives, such as reduced setback and parking requirements, and increased allowable density, lot coverage, or floor area ratio.
• PP-B.1: Assist with Development of Low-Income Housing. To assist the development of housing for households with lower incomes, the City will seek to defer, reduce, or waive fees for land divisions, lot line adjustments, and Specific Plans proposing, or resulting in parcel sizes that facilitate, multi-family developments affordable to households with lower incomes (i.e., determined by the State to be 0.5– 10 acres). The City will work with property owners and nonprofit developers to target an d market the availability of sites with the best potential for development. In addition, the City will offer the following incentives for the development of affordable housing, including but not limited to:
o Streamlining and expediting of the approval process for land division for projects that include affordable housing units
o Ministerial review of lot line adjustments
o Deferral or waiver of fees related to the subdivision for projects affordable to households with lower incomes
o Reduced setback and parking requirements
o Increased allowable density, lot coverage, and floor area ratio o Technical assistance to identify funding and with the modification of development requirements
City staff will seek to have approximately 50% of the units developed as a result of t his program in lower resource areas to serve existing lower income communities and minimize displacement and approximately 50% of the units developed as a result of this program in higher resource areas to provide greater opportunities to lower income households. • PP-B.2: Expedite Development. Expedite development of housing projects for seniors, people with disabilities, or people with low and moderate incomes. The City will consider waving or reducing fees for shelters/transitional and permanent supportive housing projects. • PP-B.6: Senate Bill (SB) 35 Streamlined and Ministerial Approval Process. The City will establish a streamlined, ministerial review process for qualifying multi -family residential projects consistent with SB 35.
• PP-C.2: Update the City’s ADU Policies to Comply with Changes in State Law.

Multiple State laws have been passed since 2019 establishing statewide standards for local regulations governing ADU development. State law requires that ADUs be allowed on any single- family residential la nd, despite local ordinances or homeowners ’

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-40
association rules and requirements, as well as multi -family residential land. Additionally, State law requires jurisdictions to develop a plan to encourage and incentivize ADUs in an effort to address the current California housing crisis. The City will update the current ADU ordinance to ensure that the policies conform to State requirements, as established by Assembly Bill (AB) 3182 (2020), Senate Bill 13, AB 68, AB 881, AB 587, AB 670, and AB 671 (2019). Such an update would modify the requirements of ADU development in the City, including restrictions on unit sizes and allowance of ADUs in multi-family zones. • PP-C.3: Plan to Encourage ADUs. AB 671 requires local agencies’ housing elements to include a plan that promotes the creation of ADUs that can offer affordable rents for households with very low, low, or moderate incomes. As part of the ADU ordinance update (including public outreach), the City will also explore options to facilitate affordable housing options for ADUs , such as tiny homes, throughout the City . The City will also explore incentives and tools to facilitate ADU construction, such as pre- approved ADU plans or kits, waived development impact fees, increased outreach and education, larger unit square footage allowances and reduced setback and lot coverage standards in exchange for deed restrictions, among other incentives. • PP-F.1: Advertise Available Resources. In addition to providing funding opportunities related to HUD programs on the City’s website (See Proposed Program PP-B.4), funding opportunities will also be posted on all City social media accounts and include information on vacant surplus land currently owned by the City and information on local Opportunity Zones for the development of affordable housing (i.e., location, size, and zoning).

This program will be available for developments throughout the City, while target ing higher resource areas due to their greater competitiveness for low income housing tax credits and to promote opportunit ies for lower income households, with a target of approximately 70% of units developed in such areas and approximately 30% of units in lower resource areas.
• PP-F.2: Monitor Grant Opportunities and Maximize Grant Applications. The City will access informati on from HCD and other State agencies to identify grant application opportunities for affordable housing. When grant opportunities are known, the City will reach out to affordable housing stakeholders to identify projects and/or opportunities to include on grant applications.

This program will be available for developments throughout the City and will focus on developers and sites in higher resource areas due to the greater competitiveness for low income housing tax credits and to promote opportunities for l ower income households, with a target of approximately 70% of units developed in such areas and approximately 30% of units in lower resource areas.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-41
• PP-F.3: Local Housing Trust. Study the availability of local resources available to establish a Local Housing Trust, a Community Land Trust, or similar nonprofit entity. The Trust will serve the entire City, with a focus on funding development in higher resource areas due to their greater competitiveness for low income housing tax credits and to promote opportunities for lower income households, with a target of approximately 70% of units developed in such areas and approximately 30% of units in lower resource areas. • PP-H.2: Adopt Ordinances and Policies that Encourage a Diverse Housing Stock for All Income Levels. Adopting or amending ordinances for Inclusionary Housing and permit streamlining can work together to encourage a diverse housing stock. See other objectives for proposed activities regarding such topics. • PP-L.1: Down Payment Assistance Program. Continue the mortgage assistance program and maximize funding for the program. Many residents have identified the lack of funds for a down payment as a major reason for not owning a home. • PP-L.2: Development Impact Fee Deferral for Affordable For -Sale Housing Development. Explore the potential deferral of development impact fees for affordable for-sale housing developments until close of escrow.
• PP-L.3: Development Impact Fee Waiver for Old Town Victorville Area. Explore the potential waiver of development impact fees for all types of housing within Old Town. • PP-Q.6: Remove Barriers for Renters. The City will review local ordinances and work to remove any barriers that keep residents from accessing safe and affordable housing, such as redlining and crime-free multifamily housing ordinances.

Displacement Protections
• EP-D.3: Residential Rehabilitation Program . This program is designed to facilitate home improvements and/ or correct any health and safety or building code violations. The program offers low-interest, deferred loans to income eligible homeowners throughout the City; loan funds are limited.
• PP-D.3: Support Nonprofits in Pursuing Rehabilitation Programs. Support nonprofit organizations in pursuing funding for residential rehabilitation programs and projects . In addition to providing a menu of incentives/concessions (See Proposed Program PP-B.4), the City will invite nonprofits to discuss the City’s plans, resources, and development opportunities every one to two years. As appropriate, the City will offer application assistance for state and federal financial resources. This program will focus on concentrated areas of poverty and areas with more code enforcement citations , with a target for at least 50% of assisted units to be in such areas.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-42
• PP-D.4: Assist Residents with Extremely Low, Very Low, and Low Incomes.

Continue to use CDBG, HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and other funding sources for the City’s Residential Rehabilitation Program, which assist s residents with extremely low, very low, and low inco mes with housing rehabilitation Citywide.

Additionally, the City will work to promote the importance of property maintenance to long- term housing quality and the availability of resources for residential rehabilitation. To do so, the City will revise its website with more information and work with the Public Information Officer to provide more information to local families and community groups.

This program will focus on concentrated areas of poverty and areas with more code enforcement citations, with a target for at least 50% of assisted units to be in such areas. • PP-E.3: Replacement Housing. The Sites Inventory includes two non-vacant sites with existing residential uses. Neither site is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts ren ts. When housing development is proposed for these two non- vacant sites, City staff will determine whether current or prior site uses necessitate replacement affordable housing in accordance with Government Code section 65915. If the current or prior site uses necessitate replacement affordable housing, the City will ensure that replacement housing units at similar income levels will be created, either by the proposed developer of the site or another party. Furthermore, to minimize displacement, City staff will encourage redevelopment of existing housing to build at least as many units as exist, in total and of lower-income housing, especially in lower resource areas. • PP-J.2: Displacement Prevention. Minimize the displacement of households with lower incomes and special needs whenever possible and, where necessary, ensure that displacement is carried out in an equitable manner.
• EP-Q.1: Fair Housing Laws. The City contracts with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board to provide investigation and counselin g assistance to address the alleged violations of federal and State housing laws.
• EP-Q.2: Redlining Complaints. The City follows the established protocol for referral of residents with redlining complaints to the appropriate authority.

Place-Making and Revitalization
• PP-F.5: Community Revitalization and Investment Authority. Establish a Community Revitalization and Investment Authority (CRIA) in the Old Town area that would allow the City to use a portion of the property tax increment generated in that area to develop affordable housing and otherwise support the Old Town community’s revitalization, including projects to address homelessness. The CRIA would further the implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan and support new residential development in a low resource area while simultaneously supporting the enhancement of the area to promote an

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-43
equitable quality of life. Improvements could include infrastructure, neighborhood walkability, access to transit, and other amenities (also Program PP-I.8). • PP-A.1: Update the City’s Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance. Incorporate changes to bring the City’s Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance into compliance with new State laws. Specifically, modify development standards and regulations to streamline and remove barriers to residential development (particularly affordable housing, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), emergency shelters, and t ransitional/supportive housing). These modified standards could include increasing R-4 development standards from 20 units per acre to 30 units per acre (See Proposed Program PP -A.4), reducing setback and lot coverage standards, creating objective standards, and waiving development impact fees, among others. Parking requirements for emergency shelters will be updated as part of the Zoning Ordinance amendment to be in compliance with California Government Code, Section 655834. Additionally, any modified standards shall be directed toward meeting the social and economic needs of the community (also Proposed Program PP-A.1). • PP-O.2: Safe Housing Conditions Education. Collaborate with local community organizations, especially those serving lower resource areas, to educate Victorville residents on safe housing conditions and equip them with the necessary tools to report such conditions to code enforcement officials. This would include annual outreach to local community organizations to organize educational events for, and deliver educational materials to, the local community
Furthermore, community and developer feedback obtained during the public engagement process provided the following recommendations that were included in Housing Element programs to encourage development in Victorville:
• Update the City’s Zoning Ordinance, along with the Land Use Element to modify development standards and regulations to streamline and remove barriers to residential development;
• Consider waving or reducing fees for shelters/transitional and permanent supportive housing projects; and
• Update the City’s Accessory Dwelling Unit policies to comply with change in the law and encourage the maximization of single-family lots.

Additionally, the review of the City’s 5
th Cycle Housing Element progress (Chapter 5: Review of Previous Housing Element (2013- 2021) allowed the City to identif y areas of improvement in developing the 6th Cycle Housing Element goals and policies.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-44
Sites Inventory
The location of housing in relation to resources and opportunities is integral to addressing disparities in housing needs and opportunity and to fostering inclusive communities where all residents have access to opportunity. This is particularly important for lower‐income households.

AB 686 added a new requirement for Housing Elements to analyze the location of lower‐income sites in relation to areas of high opportunity.

Because all of the City’s census tracts are designated in the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map as having a moderate or lower level of opportunity, the City identif ied resource areas differently. Resource-advantaged areas , from the City’s perspective, have higher levels of access to public services, public transit, parks, educational and employment opportunities, medical services, and other daily services (e.g., grocery and pharmacy).

Figure B-22 illustrates the location of the sites throughout the City, which are detailed in the Sites Inventory. Projected units are classified by affordability level in a way to balance locating lower- income sites in areas that are already zoned for higher -density residential development and in resource-advantaged areas:
• Improved Conditi ons: The sites are intentionally located throughout the City, taking advantage of the City’s rezoning program (PP-A.3, Increase Zoning in Areas Zoned for Multi-Family and PP -A.4, Change Zoning in Appropriate Commercial and Residential Zones), to maintain and encourage diverse neighborhoods and to provide the best amenities that the City has to offer, particularly for lower-income households. “Amenities” in this context refers to access to employment centers, commercial areas, schools, transit, parks, and public services.
• Exacerbated Conditions: Because sites are located throughout the City, some sites are located in areas of greater minority and/or poverty concentration. In particular, sites designated for lower-income units are more frequently located in Hispanic concentration and poverty concentration areas and in high segregation and poverty areas as identified by the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area M ap. This relative concentration results from the City locating lower -income sites in areas that are already zoned for higher -density development, per the HCD guidelines. However, the City seeks to mitigate the impact of this concentration through its rezoning program (PP-A.3, Increase Zoning in Areas Zoned for Multi-Family and PP-A.4, Change Zoning in Appropriate Commercial and Residential Zones), which will encourage lower -income sites to be located in areas with more resources and will help to revitalize areas in which lower-income sites are located.

Integration and Segregation: Race and Income
Census tracts with the highest minority and poverty concentrations are located throughout the City. As a result, sites designated for lower -income units are located in such areas. In most

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-45
cases, however, the percentage of lower -income units in minority concentration areas are comparable to the percentages of moderate- and above- moderate-income units in minority concentration areas:
• 21% of lower-income units are located in Asian concentration areas, compared to 24% of moderate- and above-moderate-income units.
• 84% of lower -income units are located in African American concentration areas , compared to 87% of moderate- and above-moderate-income units. • 31% of lower-income units are located in (overall) minority concentration areas, compared to 25% of moderate- and above-moderate-income units.
• 66% of lower-income units are located in Hispanic concentration areas, compared to 47% of moderate- and above-moderate-income units.
• 23% of lower-income units are located in poverty concentration areas, compared to 3% of moderate- and above-moderate-income units.

The Old Town and Civic Center Specific Plan Areas, where the majority of current high-density- zoned sites are located, are also among the City’s poverty concentration areas. These Specific Plan Areas are still appropriate locations f or lower-income housing due to their high- density zoning and proximity to jobs, transit, schools, and public services. Furthermore, Housing Element Goal 7, Improve Quality of Life and Promote Placemaking, and corresponding policies and programs will help to improve these areas.

Without the program s to increase allowable density in residential zones and to rezone commercial areas for residential and mixed-use development (PP-A.3, Increase Zoning in Areas Zoned for Multi-Family and PP-A.4, Change Zoning in Appropriate Commercial and Residential Zones), the percentage of lower-income units sited in poverty concentration areas would be even greater. The program s enable the City to encourage high- density and lower -income development in portions of the City with a lower poverty concentration. Furthermore, the City intends for the siting of mixed-income sites in the Old Town and Civic Center Specific Plan Areas and for the up zoning of the Seventh Street Commercial Corridor to help revitalize the areas.

Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty
The R/ECAPs in the City contain less than 4% of the sites, all of which are based on proposed or entitled developments. Furthermore, 99.6% of the units associated with those sites are designated for above- moderate-income households, which should help to reduce the concentration of poverty in that area.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-46
Access to Opportunity
Figure B‐1 shows housing sites identified in the inventory in relation to resource areas defined by the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map. The sites currently identified to accommodate the lower ‐income housing need are located in areas throughout the City , including currently commercially zoned areas that the City has identified for rezoning to further fair housing more affirmatively. Approximately 28% of the lower ‐income units and 16% of the moderate- and above-moderate-income units are located in the City’s single significant moderate resource area.

The higher concentration of lower-income units in the moderate resource area depends on the City’s rezoning program.

Per the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map, the City has no high resource or highest resource areas. Aside from three areas classified as moderate resource areas, t he rest of the City is either a l ow resource area or an area of h igh segregation and p overty. Lower-income units are less concentrated in the former (24% to 66%) but are more concentrated in the latter (49% to 18%). That concentration is due to the Old Town and Civic Center Specific Plan Areas’ status as high segregation and poverty areas. The City still believes that these are appropriate areas due to proximity to jobs, transit, schools, and government services available in the Old Town and Civic Center Specific Plan Areas.

Lower-income sites have a weighted job index score of 42 compared to a score of 35 for moderate- and above-moderate income sites, indicating more access to jobs for lower -income sites on average. This is due in large part to the higher job indices (above 60) for all block groups in the Old Town and Civic Center Specific Plan Areas:
• 99.98% of lower-income units and 67% of moderate- and above-moderate-income units are located within a half-mile of a transit stop.
• 82% of lower -income units are located within 1 mile of a school compared to 74% of moderate and above -moderate units. (All projected units are within 1.5 miles from a school, except for the units on Site 28, a proposed and entitled two- unit development located on the City’s outskirts, approximately 2.6 miles from a school.) • The City’s greatest concentration of government services is in the Civic Center Specific Plan Area, where 36% of units are designated for lower-income households. • 31% of all units Citywide are designated for lower-income households.

The Old Town and Civic Center Specific Plan Areas are in proximity to existing commercial areas, parks, public services, and other amenities. The Housing Element includes several policies to encourage lower-income housing near such amenities (HE-A.2, HE-M.3, HE-M.5, and HE-M.6). The City will ensure that residents of new lower -income housing will have access to these types of

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-47
amenities. Proposed Program F.5 will establish a Community Revitalization and Investment Authority in the Old Town Specific Plan Area that will support revitalization of the area.

Summary
The City’s Sites Inventory (with support from the City’s rezone strategy) will affirmatively further fair housing through the following:
• The distribution of candidate rezone sites across resource areas (including the higher share of lower -income units located in the City’s TCAC/HCD moderate resource areas and in areas with better access to jobs, transit, schools, public services, and other amenities).
• The planned revitalization of low resource areas.

Contributing Factors
A fair housing contributing factor is a factor that creates, contributes to, perpetuates, or increases the severity of one or more fair housing issues. Surveys of the community and discussions with community members, affordable housing advocates, and an assessment of fair housing issues identified several factors that contribute to fair housing in the City, as identified in Table B-6. The Meaningful Actions column references the Housing Element programs (as identified in Chapter 7 of the Housing Element) that will address fair housing issues and contributing factors.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-48
Table B-6. Factors that Contribute to Fair Housing Issues in Victorville AFFH

IDENTIFIED
FAIR

HOUSING
ISSUES

CONTRIBUTING FACTORS MEANINGFUL ACTIONS
Displacement of
residents due to
economic
pressures
Shortage of affordable rental and
homeownership options.

Development and sale of single-
family homes at market rates that
are affordable for higher-income
families attract non-City residents
to relocate to Victorville, while
new housing remains
unaffordable for existing
residents.

Assist with Development of Low-Income Housing (PP-B.1)
Expedite Development (PP-B.2)
Plan to Encourage and Incentivize ADUs (PP-C.3)
Housing Choice Vouchers (PP-E.1)
Displacement Prevention (PP-J.2)
Down Payment Assistance Program (PP-L.1)
Community Revitalization and Investment Authority (PP-F.5) Cost of rehabilitation or repair of
existing housing stock in older
neighborhoods
Assist Residents with Extremely Low, Very Low, and Low Incomes (PP-D.4)
Advertise Rehabilitation Programs (PP-D.5)
Lack of renter
protections
Economic uncertainty tied to
ongoing pandemic increased the
risk of displacement for lower-
income households
Policy HE-J.1: Explore the feasibility and potential impacts of a Rent Stabilization Ordinance to provide protections from significant rent increases and to prevent homelessness.

Land use and
zoning laws
Areas in Victorville that are
underdeveloped that could
provide housing opportunities for
Victorville residents
Update the City's Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance (PP- A.1)
Increase Zoning in Areas Zoned for Multi-Family (PP-A.3) Change Zoning in Appropriate Commercial Zones (PP-A.4)
Zoning Changes (PP-H.3)
Availability of
public
transportation
Outlying areas of Victorville,
particularly the northern region,
lack transit options
Update and Implement the City's Land Use Element (PP-M.1) Location of
employers
Areas along the I-15 corridor and
East Victorville and near the
airport have closest proximity to
jobs; west Victorville has most
limited access to jobs
Community Revitalization and Investment Authority (PP-F.5). 1 Notes:
1 PP-F.5 is listed as a meaningful action for the fair housing issue location of employers because the City could use 75% of their property tax increment for economic development. This would be an economic development policy and not a Housing Element policy.

As identified in the assessment of disproportionate housing need and displacement risk in the Disproportionate Housing Need and Displacement Risk section, a shortage of both rental and ownership housing that is affordable to all lower-income households currently exists in the City.

The City is aware of these affordability issues and has identified the need for affordable housing in a variety of types and improvement of access to amenities and opportunities in low resource areas as priorities to meet unmet needs and to address fair housing.

In Chapter 7 of the Housing Element, the City has incorporated actions throughout the Housing Element goals, policies, and programs to address these factors and all issues identified in this assessment. The programs in the Housing Element will affirmatively further fair housing, per AB 686, and are i ntended to address significant disparities in housing needs and i n access to opportunity for all groups protected by State and Federal law. Furthermore, the programs in the Housing Element will ensure that the C ity furthers patterns of integration and development of affordable housing to have a positive impact on residents of the City and the Victor Valley region.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-49
Figure B-1. TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-50

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-51
Figure B-2. Minority Concentration Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-52

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-53
Figure B-3. African American Concentration Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-54

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-55
Figure B-4. Hispanic Concentration Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-56

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-57
Figure B-5. Asian Concentration Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-58

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-59
Figure B-6. Poverty Concentration Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-60

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-61
Figure B-7. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-62

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-63
Figure B-8. Diversity Index Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-64

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-65
Figure B-9. Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-66

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-67
Figure B-10. Percent of Adults Living with Spouse Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-68

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-69
Figure B-11. Percent of Adults Living Alone Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-70

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-71
Figure B-12. Percent of Children in Married-Couple Families Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-72

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-73
Figure B-13. Percent of Children in Single Female-Headed Households Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-74

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-75
Figure B-14. Transit Proximity Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-76

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-77
Figure B-15. Jobs Proximity Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-78

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-79
Figure B-16. Schools Proximity Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-80

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-81
Figure B-17. Percent of People with Disabilities Regional Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-82

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-83
Figure B-18. Percent of People with Disabilities Local Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-84

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-85
Figure B-19. Renter Cost Burden Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-86

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-87
Figure B-20. Owner Cost Burden Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-88

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-89
Figure B-21. Overcrowding

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-90

This page intentionally left blank.

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-91
Figure B-22. Site Inventory Map

2021–2029 Housing Element
Appendix B. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

B-92

This page intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX C – SITES INVENTORY

This page intentionally left blank.

Please Start Here, Instructions in Cell
A2, Table in A3:B15 Form Fields
Site Inventory Forms must be submitted to
HCD for a housing element or amendment
adopted on or after January 1, 2021. The
following form is to be used for satisfying
this requirement. To submit the form,
complete the Excel spreadsheet and submit
to HCD at [email protected].

Please send the Excel workbook, not a
scanned or PDF copy of the tables.

General Information
Jurisidiction Name VICTORVILLE
Housing Element Cycle 6th
Contact Information
First Name Scott
Last Name Webb
Title City Planner
Email
[email protected]
Phone (760) 955-5135
Mailing Address
Street Address 14343 Civic Drive
City Victorville
Zip Code 92393
Table A: Housing Element Sites Inventory, Table Starts in Cell A2 Jurisdiction Name Site
Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP Code Assessor Parcel
Number
Consolidated
Sites
General Plan
Designation (Current)
Zoning
Designation
(Current)
Minimum Density
Allowed (units/acre)
Max Density
Allowed (units/acre) Parcel Size (Acres) Existing
Use/Vacancy Infrastructure Publicly-Owned Site Status Identified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s) Lower Income Capacity
Moderate
Income Capacity
Above Moderate
Income Capacity Total Capacity Optional
Information1
Optional
Information2
Optional
Information3
VICTORVILLE 16658    B ST 92395 0478 ‐244‐09 A Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 15.1 34 1.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 27 0 0 27 VICTORVILLE 15557    SECOND ST 92395 0478 ‐244‐10 A Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 15.1 34 1.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of 2nd St & B St 92395 0478 ‐244‐11 A Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 15.1 34 1.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of 2nd St & B St 92395 0478 ‐244‐12 A Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 15.1 34 1.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15562    3RD ST 92395 0478 ‐244‐17 A Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 15.1 34 1.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16809    C ST 92395 0478 ‐223‐12 Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 15.1 34 0.48 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 12 0 0 12 VICTORVILLE 15507    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐211‐01 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 54 0 0 54 VICTORVILLE 15513    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐211‐02 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15519    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐211‐03 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  side corners of A St and 8 92395 0478 ‐211‐04 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15535    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐211‐24 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15504    HESPERIA RD 92395 0478 ‐211‐25 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15520    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐212‐10 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15514    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐212‐11 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15504    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐212‐12 B Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of 6TH ST & A St 92395 0478 ‐221‐15 C Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 0.86 Mixed  Use Retail, PaYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 33 0 0 33 VICTORVILLE East  corner of 6TH ST & A St 92395 0478 ‐221‐16 C Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 0.86 Mixed  Use Retail, PaYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of 6TH ST & A St 92395 0478 ‐221‐23 C Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 0.86 Mixed  Use Retail, PaYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of 6TH ST & A St 92395 0478 ‐221‐25 C Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 0.86 Mixed  Use Retail, PaYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15453    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐106‐02 D Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 0.95 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 36 0 0 36 VICTORVILLE 15467    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐106‐03 D Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 0.95 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15475    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐106‐04 D Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 0.95 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15485    EIGHTH ST 92395 0478 ‐106‐07 D Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 0.95 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15490    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐105‐01 E Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 74 0 0 74 VICTORVILLE 15488    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐105‐02 E Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15472    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐105‐03 E Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15464    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐105‐04 E Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15448    8TH ST 92395 0478 ‐105‐06 E Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15442    EIGHTH ST 92395 0478 ‐105‐07 E Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16924    FOREST AVE 92395 0478 ‐105‐08 E Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 15481    7TH ST 92395 0478 ‐105‐18 E Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 18 48 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of Seneca & Amar 92394 3106 ‐261‐08 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 9.97 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 119 120 239 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  corner of Seneca & Amar 92394 3106 ‐261‐09 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 4.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 48 48 96 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  corner of Seneca & Amar 92394 3106 ‐261‐10 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 8.34 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 100 100 200 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  corner of Seneca & Amar 92394 3106 ‐261‐11 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 13.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 120 120 240 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  corner of Seneca & Civc  92394 3106 ‐261‐14 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 2.93 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 35 35 70 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  corner of Seneca & Civc  92394 3106 ‐261‐15 F Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 9.18 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 110 110 220 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  corner of Seneca & Civc  92394 3106 ‐261‐16 F Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 9.18 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element Used in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  corner of Seneca & Civc  92394 3106 ‐261‐17 F Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 9.18 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element Used in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  corner of Seneca & Civc  92394 3106 ‐261‐18 F Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 9.18 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element Used in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  corner of Amargosa & K 92394 3106 ‐181‐11 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 3.14 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 38 37 0 75 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  corner of Amargosa & K 92394 3106 ‐181‐12 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 3.71 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 45 44 0 89 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  corner of Kimberly Park & 92394 3106 ‐181‐13 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 3.66 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 44 43 0 87 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  side of Amargosa, north 92392 0396 ‐013‐32 G Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 6.63 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 159 0 0 159 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  side of Amargosa, north 92392 0396 ‐013‐33 G Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Mixe 0 30 6.63 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element Used in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  Corner of Borego Rd & Pa 92392 0396 ‐013‐19 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Com 0 30 2.7 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 64 0 0 64 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE 14195    MACART LN 92392 0396 ‐013‐20 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Com 0 30 1.15 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 27 0 0 27 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  Corner of Borego Rd & Pa 92392 0396 ‐013‐24 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Com 0 30 2.82 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 67 0 0 67 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  side of Macart Ln & Palm 92392 0396 ‐013‐58 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Com 0 30 5.27 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 124 0 0 124 VICTORVILLE East  Corner of Seneca & Boreg 92392 0396 ‐013‐13 Civic  Center Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Civic Com 0 30 4.44 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 106 0 0 106 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE 16477    D ST 92395 0478 ‐044‐13 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 140 45 0 185 VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Pearl Arbor  92395 0478 ‐044‐14 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16501    D ST 92395 0478 ‐044‐15 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Pearl Arbor  92395 0478 ‐044‐26 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16655    PEARL ARBOR TERRAC 92395 0478 ‐044‐29 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Pearl Arbor  92395 0478 ‐044‐30 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Pearl Arbor  92395 0478 ‐044‐31 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16704    PEARL ARBOR TERRAC 92395 0478 ‐044‐34 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16678    PEARL ARBOR TERRAC 92395 0478 ‐044‐35 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Pearl Arbor  92395 0478 ‐044‐36 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16486    PEARL ARBOR TERRAC 92395 0478 ‐044‐37 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Pearl Arbor  92395 0478 ‐044‐38 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16693    PEARL ARBOR TERRAC 92395 0478 ‐044‐43 H Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 4.84 Vacant YES  ‐ Current YES  ‐ City‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  of B St & 11 St 92395 0478 ‐201‐20 I Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 3.06 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 117 0 0 117 VICTORVILLE West  of B St & 11 St 92395 0478 ‐201‐21 I Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Mixed Us 0 48 3.06 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of Nuevo Rd & 5th 92395 3091 ‐331‐02 J Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 6.62 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 106 106 VICTORVILLE East  corner of Nuevo Rd & 5th 92395 3091 ‐331‐01 J Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 6.62 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of Bear Valley Rd & 92395 3091 ‐351‐02 K Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 9.26 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 148 0 0 148 VICTORVILLE East  corner of Bear Valley Rd & 92395 3091 ‐351‐03 K Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 9.26 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of Bear Valley Rd & 92395 3091 ‐351‐01 Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 8.65 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 139 0 0 139 VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐03 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 376 376 VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐04 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐05 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐06 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐07 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐08 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐09 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐10 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐11 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐12 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐13 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐14 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐15 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐16 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐17 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐18 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐19 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐20 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  corner of Bear Valley Rd 92395 3091 ‐221‐21 L Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 35.75 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  corner of 2nd Ave & Jasm 92395 3091 ‐361‐04 M Office  Professional C ‐A, Office Professiona 0 no  max 8.74 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 140 140 VICTORVILLE West  Corner of 1st Ave & Jasm 92395 3091 ‐361‐05 M Office  Professional C ‐A, Office Professiona 0 no  max 8.74 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92392 3103 ‐491‐05 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 18.79 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 160 80 0 240 VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92392 3103 ‐491‐02 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 9.59 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 154 76 0 230 VICTORVILLE 11695    PALMDALE RD 92392 3103 ‐491‐03 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 9.34 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 150 74 0 224 VICTORVILLE 11715    PALMDALE RD 92301 3103 ‐531‐01 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 1.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 32 14 0 46 VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92301 3103 ‐531‐02 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 3.66 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 58 29 0 87 VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92301 3103 ‐531‐03 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 1.87 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 30 14 0 44 VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92301 3103 ‐531‐04 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 1.83 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 30 13 0 43 VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92301 3103 ‐531‐05 N High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 3.72 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 60 29 0 89 VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92301 3103 ‐531‐06 N High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 3.72 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92301 3103 ‐531‐07 O High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 3.67 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 60 28 0 88 VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92301 3103 ‐531‐08 O High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 3.67 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Palmdale  Rd, between US‐395 92301 3103 ‐531‐09 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 1.79 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 30 13 0 43 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Palmdale 92392 3105 ‐171‐01 High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0n o  max 29.78 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 160 80 0 240 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Palmdale  92392 3103 ‐611‐08 High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 4.81 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 78 37 0 115 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Palmdale  92392 3103 ‐611‐05 High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 4.77 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 76 38 0 114 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Amethyst 92392 3072 ‐211‐14 Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 4.17 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 23 23 21 67 Jurisdiction Name Site
Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP Code Assessor Parcel
Number
Consolidated
Sites
General Plan
Designation (Current)
Zoning
Designation
(Current)
Minimum Density
Allowed (units/acre)
Max Density
Allowed (units/acre) Parcel Size (Acres) Existing
Use/Vacancy Infrastructure Publicly-Owned Site Status Identified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s) Lower Income Capacity
Moderate
Income Capacity
Above Moderate
Income Capacity Total Capacity Optional
Information1
Optional
Information2
Optional
Information3
VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Amethyst 92392 3072 ‐211‐15 Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 10.16 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 55 55 53 163 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Amethyst 92392 3072 ‐211‐04 Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 8.65 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 35 35 34 104 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Shooting 92392 3072 ‐211‐11 Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 21.57 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 70 70 68 208 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Shooting  92392 3072 ‐211‐12 Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 14.99 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 96 48 0 144 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Shooting  92392 3072 ‐221‐16 Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 39.61 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 160 80 0 240 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Seneca Rd 92392 3103 ‐551‐04 High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 12.69 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 40 80 0 120 VICTORVILLE Nort  of Far Hills Ln 92392 3103 ‐531‐10 High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 9.97 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 239 0 0 239 VICTORVILLE Northwest  of Amethyst Rd & S 92392 3104 ‐101‐01 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 17.54 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 48 192 240 VICTORVILLE Northwest  of Amethyst Rd & S 92392 3104 ‐101‐02 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 17.72 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 48 192 240 VICTORVILLE Southwest  of Amethyst Rd & H 92394 3104 ‐101‐04 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 25.18 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 48 192 240 VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Blue Canyon 92394 0395 ‐091‐25 P High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 126.8 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 561 561 VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Blue Canyon 92394 0395 ‐091‐26 P High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 126.8 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  surrounding Blue Canyon 92394 0395 ‐091‐36 P High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 126.8 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Amethyst 92392 3072 ‐251‐34 High  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 43.64 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 168 168 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Mesa View 92392 3096 ‐371‐01 Vista  Verde Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Low Resid 0 5.2 37.69 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 147 147 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Monte Vi 92392 3133 ‐111‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 38.86 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 135 135 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐221‐10 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 74 74 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐234‐11 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐234‐12 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐254‐02 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐246‐07 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐234‐01 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐246‐08 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐245‐07 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐245‐04 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cahuenga 92394 0395 ‐254‐03 Q Low Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 21.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE 16759    TRACY ST 92395 0477 ‐062‐10 Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 0 15 0.16 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0202 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Daisy Rd  92392 3071 ‐101‐25 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.68 Single  Family ResideYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0022 VICTORVILLE South  of Laurel Oak Rd betwe 92392 3071 ‐631‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 10.06 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 40 40 VICTORVILLE 15959    LLANO LN 92394 0395 ‐104‐02 Very  Low Density Resident R‐1, Very Low Density R 0 5 0.52 Single  Family ResideYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 1001 A D U VICTORVILLE 12383    SECOND AVE 92395 3091 ‐241‐43 Medium  Density ResidentiaPUD, Medium Density  0n o  max 0.09 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 Used in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE 12375    SECOND AVE 92395 3091 ‐241‐42 Medium  Density ResidentiaPUD, Medium Density  0n o  max 0.09 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 Used in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Winona S 92395 3090 ‐111‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.99 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 35 35 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE West  of Coronado Dr & South 92394 0478 ‐337‐12 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 0.22 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 1001 VICTORVILLE Southeast  of Jimeno Ave & Vil 92394 0395 ‐173‐08 Very  Low Density Resident R‐1, Very Low Density R 0 5 0.38 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE South  of Winter Park between 92394 3104 ‐041‐13 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 0.16 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE 16397    LA PAZ DR 92395 0478 ‐304‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 0.22 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE West  Side of Cataba St & Vera 92392 3136 ‐411‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 9.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 36 36 VICTORVILLE West  side Burwood Rd betwe 92394 0395 ‐141‐14 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 0.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE Southwest  of Olivera Rd & La  92392 3092 ‐231‐29 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 0.42 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE 11842    FAR HILLS LN 92392 3103 ‐783‐06 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Very Low Density R 0 5 0.18 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE South  of Mojave Dr and East o 92394 3106 ‐201‐36 R High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 29.33 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 440 440 VICTORVILLE South  of Mojave Dr and East o 92394 3106 ‐201‐37 R High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 29.33 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of Seneca Rd and East o 92392 0396 ‐401‐01 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 20.53 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 62 0 248 310 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Hook Blvd 92392 3104 ‐091‐16 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 33.08 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 132 132 VICTORVILLE West  of Topaz Rd & North of C 92392 3103 ‐621‐06 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.94 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 23 23 VICTORVILLE West  of Topaz Rd & North of C 92392 3103 ‐621‐07 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.64 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 34 34 VICTORVILLE West  of Topaz Rd & North of C 92392 3103 ‐621‐08 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 6.74 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 26 26 VICTORVILLE East  of Balsam Rd & South of W 92395 3092 ‐401‐01 S High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 11.34 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 212 212 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  of Balsam Rd & South of W 92395 3092 ‐401‐02 S High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 11.34 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  of Balsam Rd & South of W 92395 3092 ‐401‐10 S Commercial C ‐2, Commercial 0 no  max 11.34 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  of Ridgecrest Rd & North 92395 3090 ‐501‐03 High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 19.48 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 272 272 Used  in Prior HousingAPN was recently changed from 3090‐501 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of 11th Ave  92395 3092 ‐401‐04 High  Density Residential R ‐3, High Density Resid 0 15 18.2 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 218 0 218 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Nisqualli  92392 3092 ‐421‐06 High  Density Residential PUD,  High Density Resi 0 no  max 16.25 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 91 0 91 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Bear Valle 92392 3072 ‐011‐06 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 31.1 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 124 124 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Sycamore 92395 3072 ‐021‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 37.1 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 148 148 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of 5th Ave & 92392 3091 ‐021‐13 Very  Low Density Resident R‐1, Very Low Density R 0 5 0.48 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 Used in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  of Mesa View Dr & North 92395 3096 ‐361‐02 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 14.46 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 55 55 VICTORVILLE 15436    SIXTH ST 92392 0478 ‐097‐02 Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 15.1 25 0.47 Single  Family ResideYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0044 Replacement Housing Program will be applied. See Chapter 8.

VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐16 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 37 37 VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐17 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐18 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐19 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐20 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐19 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐20 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐21 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐22 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐23 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐24 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐25 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐26 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐27 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐28 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐29 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐30 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐21 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐22 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐23 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐24 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐25 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐49 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐53 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐54 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐55 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐56 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐551‐57 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐54 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐55 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐56 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐57 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐58 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐59 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐60 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92392 3134 ‐561‐61 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE South  of McCord Ln & Area su 92394 3134 ‐561‐62 T Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Eto Camin 92395 0395 ‐162‐12 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 0.58 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE 15521    3RD ST 92392 0478 ‐232‐11 Old  Town Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Residenti 0 15 0.16 Single  Family ResideYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE Northeast  of Olivera Rd & Eas 92392 3092 ‐291‐14 Very  Low Density Resident R‐1, Very Low Density R 0 5 0.46 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Mesa Lin 92392 3071 ‐832‐26 U Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 1.3 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0055 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Mesa Lin 92392 3071 ‐832‐27 U Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 1.3 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Mesa Lin 92392 3071 ‐832‐15 U Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 1.3 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Mesa Lin 92392 3071 ‐832‐14 U Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 1.3 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Mesa Lin 92394 3071 ‐832‐13 U Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 1.3 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE East  of Manning St & North of 92392 0395 ‐014‐25 Very  Low Density Resident R‐1, Very Low Density R 0 5 0.48 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐014‐01 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 112 112 VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐014‐02 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐014‐03 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element Jurisdiction Name Site
Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP Code Assessor Parcel
Number
Consolidated
Sites
General Plan
Designation (Current)
Zoning
Designation
(Current)
Minimum Density
Allowed (units/acre)
Max Density
Allowed (units/acre) Parcel Size (Acres) Existing
Use/Vacancy Infrastructure Publicly-Owned Site Status Identified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s) Lower Income Capacity
Moderate
Income Capacity
Above Moderate
Income Capacity Total Capacity Optional
Information1
Optional
Information2
Optional
Information3
VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐014‐04 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐014‐05 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐014‐06 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐014‐07 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐08 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐09 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐10 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐11 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐12 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐13 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐14 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐15 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐16 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐17 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Tomacita Ct St & S 92392 3096 ‐014‐18 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐19 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐20 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐21 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐22 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐23 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐24 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐25 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐26 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐27 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐28 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Menchaca Ct St &  92392 3096 ‐014‐29 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐30 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐31 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐32 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐33 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐34 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐35 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐36 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐37 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐38 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐39 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Latigo Ct St & Sout 92392 3096 ‐014‐40 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐014‐41 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐014‐42 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐014‐43 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐014‐44 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐014‐45 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐014‐46 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐014‐47 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐48 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐49 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐50 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐51 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐52 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐53 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐54 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐55 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐56 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐57 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐58 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐59 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  north of Ava Loma St bet 92392 3096 ‐014‐60 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐013‐01 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐013‐02 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐013‐03 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐013‐04 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐013‐05 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐013‐06 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along El Honcho St & Sou 92392 3096 ‐013‐07 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐08 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐09 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐10 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐11 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐12 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐13 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐14 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐15 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐16 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐17 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐18 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐19 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐20 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐21 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐22 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐23 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐24 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐25 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐26 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐27 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  North of Ojo Caliente St  92392 3096 ‐013‐28 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐013‐29 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐013‐30 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐013‐31 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐013‐32 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐013‐33 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐013‐34 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  along Chimayo St & Nort 92392 3096 ‐013‐35 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐06 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐07 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐08 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐09 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐10 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐11 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐12 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐19 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐20 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Area  around Vaccaro St & Rac 92392 3096 ‐252‐21 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Vaccaro S 92392 3096 ‐252‐22 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Vaccaro S 92392 3096 ‐252‐23 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Vaccaro S 92392 3096 ‐252‐24 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Vaccaro S 92392 3096 ‐252‐25 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Vaccaro S 92392 3096 ‐252‐26 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Casa Boni 92392 3096 ‐253‐32 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element Jurisdiction Name Site
Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP Code Assessor Parcel
Number
Consolidated
Sites
General Plan
Designation (Current)
Zoning
Designation
(Current)
Minimum Density
Allowed (units/acre)
Max Density
Allowed (units/acre) Parcel Size (Acres) Existing
Use/Vacancy Infrastructure Publicly-Owned Site Status Identified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s) Lower Income Capacity
Moderate
Income Capacity
Above Moderate
Income Capacity Total Capacity Optional
Information1
Optional
Information2
Optional
Information3
VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Casa Boni 92394 3096 ‐253‐33 V Talon  Ranch Specifin Plan Specific  Plan, Medium‐ 3 6 24.21 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE West  side of Hagador Ave & S 92394 0395 ‐084‐09 Very  Low Density Resident R‐1, Very Low Density R 0 5 0.5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 VICTORVILLE 15091    ARLETTE DR 92395 3106 ‐171‐31 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 0.16 Single  Family ResideYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 A D U VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of 2nd Ave & 92394 3091 ‐141‐02 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.78 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 17 17 VICTORVILLE North  of Seneca Rd between U 92394 3135 ‐361‐05 W Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 19.54 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 71 71 VICTORVILLE North  of Seneca Rd between U 92395 3135 ‐361‐06 W Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 19.54 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 71 71 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cherry Hi 92392 0480 ‐123‐12 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 0.23 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0011 Used in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE 13222    EL RIO RD 92394 3092 ‐251‐02 Very  Low Density Resident R‐1, Very Low Density R 0 5 0.42 Single  Family ResideYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 1 1 ADU VICTORVILLE East  of Amethyst Rd & Southw 92394 0394 ‐031‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.76 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 35 35 VICTORVILLE East  of Amethyst Rd & Northw 92394 0394 ‐031‐02 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.62 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 VICTORVILLE Between  Amethyst Rd & Valle 92394 0394 ‐031‐03 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.62 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 VICTORVILLE East  of Amethyst Rd & Southw 92394 0394 ‐031‐04 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 17.79 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 71 71 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Amethyst 92394 0394 ‐031‐05 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.63 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Mojave D 92394 0394 ‐031‐06 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.63 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Mojave D 92394 0394 ‐031‐07 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.28 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 17 17 VICTORVILLE South  of Old Mill Ln & Valley H 92392 0394 ‐031‐08 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Mesa Vie 92392 3134 ‐121‐41 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 25.55 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 102 102 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Saxton W 92392 3071 ‐341‐09 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.65 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 34 34 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Saxton W 92392 3071 ‐341‐04 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.04 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Saxton W 92392 3071 ‐341‐03 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 10.05 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 40 40 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Sycamore 92392 3071 ‐371‐05 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 10.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 40 40 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Caliente  92392 3071 ‐371‐06 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Caliente R 92395 3071 ‐371‐14 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of 2nd Ave & 92392 3091 ‐141‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.01 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 Used  in Prior Housing Element ‐ Vacant VICTORVILLE East  of Fremonita Rd & South  92392 3096 ‐341‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 9.52 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 38 38 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Fremonit 92392 3096 ‐341‐04 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.99 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 35 35 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Luna Rd & 92392 3096 ‐341‐05 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.79 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 35 35 VICTORVILLE West  side of Fremonita Rd & S 92392 3096 ‐341‐09 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.57 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 34 34 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Luna Rd & 92392 3096 ‐321‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 19.58 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 78 78 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Maricopa 92392 3096 ‐321‐07 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.24 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 16 16 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Fremonit 92392 3096 ‐321‐08 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.34 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 17 17 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Maricopa 92392 3096 ‐321‐09 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.69 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Fremonit 92392 3096 ‐321‐10 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.8 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 19 19 VICTORVILLE North  of Fern Pine St between 92392 3096 ‐321‐15 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 2.78 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 11 11 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Olivera R 92392 3096 ‐361‐05 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.56 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 VICTORVILLE Along  Olivera Rd between Me 92392 3096 ‐361‐06 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.53 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Mesa View 92392 3096 ‐361‐07 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.26 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 17 17 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Seneca R 92392 3103 ‐551‐05 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 54.93 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 240 0 0 240 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Mesa St & 92392 3136 ‐441‐01 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 9.17 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 36 36 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Mesa St & 92392 3136 ‐441‐02 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 37.16 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 148 148 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Jargon Rd 92392 0405 ‐331‐03 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 7.96 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 122 122 244 VICTORVILLE 10883  JARGON RD 92392 0405 ‐331‐05 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 9.35 Farm YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 116 116 232 VICTORVILLE 10758  JARGON RD 92392 0405 ‐331‐06 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 8.69 Paved  road YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 122 122 244 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Jargon Rd 92394 0405 ‐331‐08 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 9.34 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 111 111 222 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Little Par 92394 0394 ‐031‐10 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 VICTORVILLE West  of Red Oak Way & North 92394 0394 ‐031‐11 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.03 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Red Oak  92394 0394 ‐031‐12 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.51 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 VICTORVILLE Northwest  Corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐892‐01 X West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Medium  6 8 25.8 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 180 180 VICTORVILLE Northwest  Corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐892‐02 X West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Medium  6 8 25.8 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northwest  Corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐892‐04 X West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Medium  6 8 25.8 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Northwest  Corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐892‐02 West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Medium  5 7 25.8 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 80 80 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Cobalt Rd 92394 0455 ‐892‐05 West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Medium  5 7 11.08 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 55 55 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐882‐01 Z West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Low Dens 4 6 22.65 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 115 115 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐882‐02 Z West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Low Dens 4 6 22.65 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 115 115 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐882‐03 AA West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Low Dens 3 5.5 18.05 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 75 75 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐882‐04 AA West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Low Dens 3 5.5 18.05 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Amethys 92394 0455 ‐882‐05 AA West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Low Dens 3 5.5 18.05 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Cobalt Rd 92392 0455 ‐882‐07 West  Creek Specific Plan Specific  Plan, Low Dens 2 4.5 27.37 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 115 115 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Jargon Rd 92392 0405 ‐331‐09 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 10.19 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 244 244 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Jargon Rd 92392 0405 ‐331‐10 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 4.4 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 105 105 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Jargon Rd 92392 0405 ‐331‐11 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 2.55 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 61 61 VICTORVILLE 13290    SMOKE TREE RD 92392 0405 ‐331‐12 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 2.06 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 49 49 VICTORVILLE 13112    SMOKE TREE RD 92392 0405 ‐331‐17 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.08 Single  Family ResideYES ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 122 122 Replacement  Housing Program will be applied. See Chapter 8.

VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Jargon Rd 92392 0405 ‐331‐18 Low  Density Residential R ‐1, Low Density Reside 0 5 5.08 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 122 122 VICTORVILLE Southeast  corner of Seneca Rd 92392 3105 ‐271‐01 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 8.51 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 204 0 0 204 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Petaluma 92392 3105 ‐271‐02 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 4.54 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 109 0 0 109 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Petaluma 92392 3105 ‐271‐03 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 4.34 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 104 0 0 104 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner El Evado Rd 92392 3105 ‐271‐06 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 4.2 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 100 0 0 100 VICTORVILLE Northwest  corner of Petaluma 92392 3105 ‐261‐03 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 9.15 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 219 0 0 219 VICTORVILLE Northeast  corner of Paicoma R 92392 3105 ‐261‐05 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 7.18 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 172 0 0 172 VICTORVILLE Southwest  corner of Seneca R 92392 3105 ‐261‐06 High  Density Residential R ‐4, High Density Resid 0 20 8.6 Vacant YES  ‐ Current NO  ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending  Project Not  Used in Prior Housing Element 206 0 0 206 Table B: Candidate Sites Identified to be Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need, Table Starts in Cell Jurisdiction
Name Site Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP Code Assessor Parcel Number
Very Low-
Income Low-Income Moderate-
Income
VICTORVILLE East corner of Nuevo Rd & 5th St 92395 3091-331-02 0 0 0 VICTORVILLE East corner of Nuevo Rd & 5th St 92395 3091-331-01 VICTORVILLE East corner of Bear Valley Rd & 5th St 92395 3091-351-02 74 74 0 VICTORVILLE East corner of Bear Valley Rd & 5th St 92395 3091-351-03 VICTORVILLE East corner of Bear Valley Rd & 5th St 92395 3091-351-01 70 69 0 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-04 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-05 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-06 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-07 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-08 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-09 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-10 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-11 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-12 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-13 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-14 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-15 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-16 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-17 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-18 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-19 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-20 VICTORVILLE West corner of Bear Valley Rd & 2nd Ave 92395 3091-221-21 VICTORVILLE East corner of 2nd Ave & Jasmine St 92395 3091-361-04 0 0 0 VICTORVILLE West Corner of 1st Ave & Jasmine St 92395 3091-361-05 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92392 3103-491-05 80 80 80 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92392 3103-491-02 77 77 76 VICTORVILLE 11695 PALMDALE RD 92392 3103-491-03 75 75 74 VICTORVILLE 11715 PALMDALE RD 92301 3103-531-01 16 16 14 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92301 3103-531-02 29 29 29 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92301 3103-531-03 15 15 14 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92301 3103-531-04 15 15 13 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92301 3103-531-05 30 30 29 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92301 3103-531-06 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92301 3103-531-07 30 30 28 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92301 3103-531-08 VICTORVILLE Palmdale Rd, between US-395 and Bellflower St 92301 3103-531-09 15 15 13 VICTORVILLE Southwest corner of Palmdale Rd & Topaz Rd 92392 3105-171-01 80 80 80 VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Palmdale Rd & Topaz Rd 92392 3103-611-08 39 39 37 VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Palmdale Rd & Topaz Rd 92392 3103-611-05 38 38 38 VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Amethyst Rd & Sierra Rd 92392 3072-211-14 23 0 23 VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Amethyst Rd & Sierra Rd 92392 3072-211-15 55 0 55 VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Amethyst Rd & Bear Valley R d 92392 3072-211-04 35 0 35
VICTORVILLE Southwest corner of Shooting Star Dr & Bear Valle 92392 3072-211-11 70 0 70 VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Shooting Star Dr & Bear Valle y 92392 3072-211-12 48 48 48
VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Shooting Star Dr & Bear Valley 92392 3072-221-16 80 80 80 VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Seneca Rd & US-395 92392 3103-551-04 120 40 80 VICTORVILLE Nort of Far Hills Ln 92392 3103-531-10 239 0 0 VICTORVILLE Southwest corner of Seneca Rd & Mesa Linda Av e 92392 3103-551-05 120 120 0
VICTORVILLE Southwest corner of Jargon Rd & Mesa St 92392 0405-331-03 0 0 122 VICTORVILLE 10883 JARGON RD 92392 0405-331-05 0 0 116
VICTORVILLE 10758 JARGON RD 92392 0405-331-06 0 0 122
VICTORVILLE Northwest corner of Jargon Rd & Mojave St 92394 0405-331-08 0 0 111 VICTORVILLE Northeast corner of Jargon Rd & Mojave St 92392 0405-331-09 0 0 0 VICTORVILLE Northeast corner of Jargon Rd & Mojave St 92392 0405-331-10 0 0 0 VICTORVILLE Northeast corner of Jargon Rd & Mojave St 92392 0405-331-11 0 0 0 VICTORVILLE 13290 SMOKE TREE RD 92392 0405-331-12 0 0 0 VICTORVILLE 13112 SMOKE TREE RD 92392 0405-331-17 0 0 0 VICTORVILLE Northwest corner of Jargon Rd & Mojave St 92392 0405-331-18 0 0 0 VICTORVILLE Southeast corner of Seneca Rd & Gateside Way 92392 3105-271-01 102 102 0 VICTORVILLE Northeast corner of Petaluma Rd & Begonia Rd 92392 3105-271-02 55 54 0 VICTORVILLE Northeast corner of Petaluma Rd & Begonia Rd 92392 3105-271-03 52 52 0 VICTORVILLE Northwest corner El Evado Rd & Begonia Rd 92392 3105-271-06 50 50 0 VICTORVILLE Northwest corner of Petaluma Rd & Begonia Rd 92392 3105-261-03 110 109 0 VICTORVILLE Northeast corner of Paicoma Rd & Begonia Rd 92392 3105-261-05 86 86 0 VICTORVILLE Southwest corner of Seneca Rd & Gateside Way 92392 3105-261-06 103 103 0 6 A2
Above
Moderate-
Income
Type of Shortfall Parcel Size
(Acres)
Current General Plan
Designation Current Zoning
Proposed
General Plan
(GP)
Designation
Proposed
Zoning
106 Shortfall of Sites 6.62 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 6.62 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 9.26 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 9.26 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 8.65 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 35.75 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 140 Shortfall of Sites 8.74 Office Professional C-A, Office Professio Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 8.74 Office Professional C-A, Office Professio Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 18.79 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 9.59 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 9.34 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 1.94 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 3.66 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 1.87 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 1.83 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 3.72 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 3.72 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 3.67 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Shortfall of Sites 3.67 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 1.79 High Density Residential PUD, High Density R Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 29.78 High Density Residential R-3, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density
0 Shortfall of Sites 4.81 High Density Residential R-3, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 4.77 High Density Residential R-3, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 21 Shortfall of Sites 4.17 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 53 Shortfall of Sites 10.16 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 34 Shortfall of Sites 8.65 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 68 Shortfall of Sites 21.57 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 14.99 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 39.61 Commercial C-2, Commercial Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use 0 Shortfall of Sites 12.69 High Density Residential R-3, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density
0 Shortfall of Sites 9.97 High Density Residential R-3, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 54.93 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 122 Shortfall of Sites 7.96 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 116 Shortfall of Sites 9.35 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 122 Shortfall of Sites 8.69 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 111 Shortfall of Sites 9.34 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 244 Shortfall of Sites 10.19 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 105 Shortfall of Sites 4.4 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 61 Shortfall of Sites 2.55 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 49 Shortfall of Sites 2.06 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 122 Shortfall of Sites 5.08 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 122 Shortfall of Sites 5.08 Low Density Residential R-1, Low Density Re sHigh Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 8.51 High Density Residential R-4, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 4.54 High Density Residential R-4, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 4.34 High Density Residential R-4, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 4.2 High Density Residential R-4, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 9.15 High Density Residential R-4, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 7.18 High Density Residential R-4, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 0 Shortfall of Sites 8.6 High Density Residential R-4, High Density Re High Density R R-4, High Density 7 Minimum
Density
Allowed
Maximum
Density Allowed Total Capacity Vacant/
Nonvacant
Description
of Existing
Uses
Optional
Information1
Optional
Information2
Optional
Information3
15 30 106 Vacant Vacant
15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 148 Vacant Vacant
15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 139 Vacant Vacant
15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated
site.
15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 140 Vacant Vacant
15 30 Vacant Vacant Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 240 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 15 30 230 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR.
15 30 224 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 15 30 46 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 15 30 87 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 15 30 44 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 15 30 43 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 15 30 89 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 15 30 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow hi Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 88 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 15 30 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow hi Units shown once for consolidated site. 15 30 43 Vacant Vacant M‐2 will allow higher density than current HDR. 20 30 240 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 115 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 114 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 15 30 67 Vacant Vacant
15 30 163 Vacant Vacant
15 30 104 Vacant Vacant
15 30 208 Vacant Vacant
15 30 144 Vacant Vacant
15 30 240 Vacant Vacant
20 30 240 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 239 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 240 Vacant Vacant
20 30 244 Vacant Vacant
20 30 232 Non-Vacant Farm
20 30 244 Non-Vacant Paved road
20 30 222 Vacant Vacant
20 30 244 Vacant Vacant
20 30 105 Vacant Vacant
20 30 61 Vacant Vacant
20 30 49 Vacant Vacant
20 30 122 Non-Vacant Single Family Residential, 1
20 30 122 Vacant Vacant
20 30 204 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 109 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 104 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 100 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 219 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more
density than current HDR.
20 30 172 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 20 30 206 Vacant Vacant New HDR will allow more density than current HDR. 8 Table C: Land Use, Table Starts in A2
Zoning Designation
(From Table A, Column G) General Land Uses Allowed
C‐2, Commercial General  Commercial, Muni Code Sec. 16‐3.06 C‐A, Office Professional Administrative  Professional Offices, Muni Code Sec. 16‐3.06 PUD, High Density Residential High  Density Residential, Muni Code Sec. 16‐3.06 PUD, Medium Density Residential Medium  Density Residential, Muni Code Sec. 16‐3.06 R‐1, Low Density Residential Single ‐Family Residential, Muni Code Sec. 16‐3.06 R‐1, Very Low Density Residential Single ‐Family Residential, Muni Code Sec. 16‐3.06 R‐3, High Density Residential High  Density Residential, Muni Code Sec. 16‐3.06 R‐4, High Density Residential High  Density Residential, Muni Code Sec. 16‐3.06 Specific Plan, Civic Commons Very High Density Residential, Civic Center Specific Plan Specific Plan, Civic Mixed Mixed  Use & Very High Density Residential, Civic Center Specific Plan Specific Plan, Low Density Residential Low  Density Residential, West Creek Specific Plan Specific Plan, Low Residential and Medium‐Low ResidentLow Density Residential, Vista Verde Specific Plan Specific Plan, Medium High Density Residential Medium  Density Residential, West Creek Specific Plan Specific Plan, Medium‐Low Residential and Medium ResiMedium Density Residential, Talon Ranch Specific Plan Specific Plan, Mixed Use Retail Retail  & High Density Residential, Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan, Mixed Use Retail and Mixed Use Service Retail, Office, & High Density Residential, Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan, Mixed Use Service Office  & High Density Residential, Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan, Residential Medium Density Medium Density Residential, Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan, Residential Medium‐High Density High Density Residential, Old Town Specific Plan

This page intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX D – HOUSING AND COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REVIEW

LETTERS
Draft Housing Element HCD Findings Letter
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov

September 17, 2021

Scott Webb, City Planner
Development Department
City of Victorville
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92393-5001

Dear Scott Webb:

RE: Review of City of Victorville’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Draft Housing Element

Thank you for submitting City of Victorville’s (City) draft housing element received for review on July 20, 2021. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (b), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review. In addition, HCD considered comments from Inland Equity Partnership pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (c).

The draft element addresses many statutory requirements; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code).

The enclosed Appendix describes the revisions needed to comply with State Housing Element Law.

To remain on an eight-year planning cycle, the City must adopt its housing element within 120 calendar days from the statutory due date of October 15, 2021 for Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) localities. If adopted after this date, Government Code section 65588, subdivision (e), paragraph (4), requires the housing element be revised every four years until adopting at least two consecutive revisions by the statutory deadline. For more information on housing element adoption requirements, please visit HCD’s website at: http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community- development/housing-element/housing-element-memos/docs/sb375_final100413.pdf.

Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant; the Strategic Growth Council and HCD’s Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs; and HCD’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City will meet housing element requirements for these and other funding sources.

Scott Webb, City Planner