City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR
JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
Regular Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, March 5, 2024
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
The
City
Council
holds
its
business
meetings
in
public
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
Ralph
M.
Brown
Act,
its
established
policies
and
procedures,
and
its
adopted
parliamentary
authority.
The
Council
strives
to
carry
out
its
meetings
in
an
atmosphere
of
professionalism
with
full
participation
by
members
of
the
body
and
the
public.
As
such,
the
Presiding
Officer
is
empowered
to
govern
City
Council
Meetings
to
foster
the
efficient
and
fair
administration
of
City
business
and
reserves
the
right
to
enforce
(or
cause
to
be
enforced)
the
Meeting
Rules
of
Conduct
and
Decorum
as
set
forth
in
Chapter
5 of
the
City
Council Policy and Procedures Manual.
The
City
Council
welcomes
and
encourages
public
participation
and
invites
the
community
to
attend
in
person.
Now
that
COVID-19
cases
in
our
area
have
reduced
to
a
point
that
social
distancing
requirements
have
been
lifted,
City
Council
Meetings
will
be
held
in-person
at
City
Hall
in
Council
Chambers.
Remote
viewing
of
our
Council
Meetings
is
available
through
YouTube,
but
public comments must be given in-person at the meeting or in advance as noted below.
Public
Comments:
Members
of
the
public
may
submit
comments
electronically
to
by
4 p.m.
the
day
of
the
meeting
to
be
distributed
to
City
Council.
Participants
are
invited
to
address
the
Council
on
agendized
and
non-agendized
topics
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
Public
comments
will
be
no
longer
than
three
(3)
minutes
per
community
member.
Should
a
speaker
conclude
their
comments
prior
to
the
expiration
of
three
(3)
minutes,
the
speaker
waives
the
right
to
speak
for
any
remaining
amount
of
time.
For
further
information
about
how
to
address
the
Council,
please refer to the City’s website at
victorvilleca.gov/government/agendas
.
In
compliance
with
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act,
if
you
need
special
assistance
to
participate
in
this
meeting,
please
contact
the
City
Clerk’s
office
at
(760)
955-5188
no
later
than
72 hours
prior
to
the
meeting.
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Invocation: Pastor Jairo Gaviria of Calvary Chapel Victorville
Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain John Wickum
Proclamations/Special Presentations
Presentation Recognizing the Winners of the City's Victorville Recycles Week Contest
City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda
Conflict of Interest Declarations
Any
items
on
this
agenda
that
might
be
a
conflict
of
interest
to
any
Council
Members/Board Members should be identified at this time.
Introduction to Public Comments
Public Comments
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. United
States
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development
Required
Public
Hearing for Community Planning and Development Grants - Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
conduct
a
public
hearing
to
receive
citizen,
agency,
and
prospective
applicant
comments
regarding
the
City’s
needs
and
strategies
for
the
2024-2025 Annual Action Plan.
2. Award
of
Construction
Contract
to
Monet
Construction,
Inc.
and
Notice
of
Exemption for the New Library Renovation and Expansion, Project JM24-051
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Conduct
the
Public
Hearing
and
receive
testimony
regarding
the
proposed
project and contract;
(2) Close the Public Hearing;
(3)
Find
the
proposed
project
categorically
exempt
from
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
(“CEQA”)
under
CEQA
Guidelines
Section
15332
–
In-Fill
Development Projects;
(4)
Approve
a
Construction
Agreement
in
the
amount
not
to
exceed
$8,621,000.00
to
Monet
Construction,
Inc.
for
the
City
Library
Renovation
and
Expansion,
Project
JM24-051; and
(5)
Authorize
the
City
Manager
or
his
designee
to
execute
change
orders
in
an
amount not to exceed $862,100.00 in total, representing a 10% project contingency.
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Payroll Warrant List
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Payroll
Demand
Schedule
No.
3C
for
Payroll
Period
September
15,
2023,
through
September
29,
2023,
in
the
amount
of
$1,943,906.68
covering
Check
Nos.
20001
through
20500*
and
20510
through
20542,
including
Vendor
checks,
per
adopted
budget
for
Fiscal
Year
2023-
2024 (period covering July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024).
4. Payroll Warrant List
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Payroll
Demand
Schedule
No.
6B
for
Payroll
Period
December
8,
2023,
through
December
22,
2023,
in
the
amount
of
$2,051,272.09
covering
Check
Nos.
33815
through
33831,
including
Vendor
checks.
Please
note
employee
Check
No.
33820
has
a
live
Check
and
an
EFT
Advice.
Also
included
are
Advice
Nos.
308303
through
308833,
per
adopted
budget
for
Fiscal
Year
2023-2024
(period
covering
July
1,
2023,
through
June
30,
2024).
5. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Commercial
Demand
Schedule
No.
15 in
the
amount
of
$10,357,144.81,
covering
Electronic
Fund
Transfers
No.
338030
through
338172
and
Warrant
No.
794102
through
794320
for
02/08/2024
through
02/21/2024,
and
Wire
Transfers
dated
02/14/2024
and
02/15/2024,
per
the
adopted
budget
for
Fiscal
Year
2023-2024
for
the
period
covering
July
1,
2023
through June 30, 2024.
6. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 13816
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Water
and
Sewer
Labor & Materials Securities for Tract Map No. 13816.
7. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 16463
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Water
and
Sewer
Labor & Materials Securities for Tract Map No. 16463.
8. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 15396
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
LMAD
Labor
&
Materials Security for Tract Map No. 15396.
9. Reduction of Securities for Case Nos. BLDC21-00070/EROW21-00182
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Labor
&
Materials
Security for case Nos. BLDC21-00070/EROW21-00182.
10. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2446
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
adopt,
by
second
reading,
Ordinance
No.
2446
revising
and
establishing
speed
zones
upon
certain
streets
in
the
City
by
amending
Title
12,
Chapter
12.20,
Section
12.20.020
of
the
Victorville
Municipal
Code,
entitled
“Decrease of State Law Maximum Speed.”
11. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2449
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
adopt,
by
second
reading,
Ordinance
No.
2449
approving
amendment
Case
PLAN23-00012,
an
amendment
to
the
Victorville
Municipal
Code
with
an
Environmental
Exemption
making
various
changes
to
Title
16,
including
but
not
limited
to:
providing
updated
regulations,
requirements,
and
standards
for
sidewalk
vendors,
solicitors,
and
other
mobile
vendors
and
businesses;
revising
business
license
processes,
procedures
and
requirement:
and
adding
and
modifying certain definitions Citywide.
12. Fire Department Newsletter
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
Council
review
and
file
the
attached
Fire
Department
Newsletter.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
13. Approval
of
Agreements
with
Five
(5)
Consultants
for
On-Call
Geotechnical
and
Engineering Testing Services
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
a
Consultant
/
Professional
Services
Provider
Agreement
with
five
(5)
consultants:
1)
Merrell
Johnson
Geotechnical,
Inc.,
2)
Geocon
West,
Inc.,
3)
RMA
Group,
4)
Ninyo
&
Moore
Geotechnical
and
Environmental
Sciences
Consultants,
and
5)
Fenagh,
Inc.,
in
an
amount
not
to
exceed
$250,000
each
for
on-call
geotechnical
and
engineering
testing
services
over the initial term of two years.
14. City Manager Reports
15. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Upcoming Agenda Items
16. Reports from Council Members
Adjournment
Item Number: 1
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing(s)
Meeting of: March 5, 2024
Submitted By:
Scott Webb, City Planner
Subject:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Required Public Hearing for Community Planning and Development Grants - Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Recommendation:
That the City Council conduct a public hearing to receive citizen, agency, and prospective applicant comments regarding the City’s needs and strategies for the 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan.
Fiscal Impact:
None at this time; however, associated Agenda Items in the future will guide the disbursement of approximately $1.98 million dollars in federal Community Planning and Development (CPD) Grants.
Strategic Plan Goal:
The subject public hearing will allow the City Council to obtain public input regarding the future allocation of available HUD funding via the 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan, which will enable the City to further fulfill the following Goals outlined in the 2024-2026 Strategic Plan:
•Goal A (Financial Sustainability) – Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds represent funding opportunities that require limited financial commitments while ensuring greater availability of general fund resources.
•Goal D (Reduce Homelessness) – Eligible activities such as public service and housing projects are aimed to directly benefit the homeless population as well as those at risk of homelessness, providing the City an opportunity to expand the outreach network and partnerships.
3 5
2 4
•Goal E (Invest In Infrastructure) – Projects that benefit or improve City facilities (e.g. parks and recreational facilities, public roadways, etc.) are eligible projects when located within CDBG Target Areas or when serving target populations.
Background:
In 1997, the City of Victorville became an Entitlement City with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This status allows the City to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds directly from HUD. Prior to Victorville’s status as an Entitlement City, CDBG funding was awarded to the City of Victorville through the County of San Bernardino and was subject to projects/programs that fulfilled a countywide need rather than those specific to the City.
The City of Victorville successfully formed a consortium in 2003 with the Town of Apple Valley in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) entitlement status with HUD. The successful formation of the consortium results in an annual allocation of HOME funds to both communities, which can be used in concert with CDBG funding to address specific needs within the City of Victorville.
As an Entitlement City for both programs, staff is responsible for all required tasks including program development, application guidance and processing, determination of project eligibility, project oversight, contract compliance, all reporting requirements, and direct draw of funds from HUD.
One of the key requirements of an Entitlement City status is the development of a five- year planning document, known as the Consolidated Plan (ConPlan). Pursuant to Section 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91, HUD has established regulations that set forth the ConPlan process. The ConPlan is designed to help states and local jurisdictions to assess their affordable housing and community development needs, market conditions, and to make data-driven, place-based investment decisions. The ConPlan, which may have a duration of between 3 and 5 years, describes the jurisdiction’s community development priorities and multiyear goals based on an assessment of housing and community development needs, an analysis of current housing and economic market conditions and available resources. Subpart E of Section 24 CFR Part 91, requires local governments that participate in a consortium to include said consortium in the ConPlan. Pursuant to this regulation, on April 19, 2022, the City of Victorville adopted the 2022-2026 ConPlan, including the required consortium component.
The ConPlan is carried out through Annual Action Plans, which provide a concise summary of the actions, activities and the specific federal and non-federal resources that will be used each year to address the priority needs and specific goals identified by the ConPlan. Each year, grantees must submit an updated Action Plan describing specific planned uses for HUD program funds, including CDBG and HOME. The fiscal year 2024- 2025 Annual Action Plan represents the third program year of the 2022-2026 ConPlan. A copy of the ConPlan in its entirety is available for the public on the City’s website 3 5
2 4
(Attachment A); however, the priority needs outlined in the City’s 2022-2026 ConPlan are provided for your reference as follows:
•Supportive services for the homeless and at risk
•Human services
•Housing programs
•Accessibility and Mobility
•Economic Development
As part of the Action Plan preparation and adoption process, citizens of the City of Victorville are afforded an opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs and issues affecting very-low and low income persons. Public notices to facilitate community participation were published in a local newspaper 10 days prior to the hearing date in accordance with the Citizen Participation Plan (Attachment B), which included notices in both English and Spanish and the notice was also placed at the Victorville City Library, Hook Community Center and posted on the City’s website. Lastly, statements regarding the availability of special accommodations for non-English speaking persons and those with disabilities are printed on all written materials pertaining to the Annual Action Plan development.
Discussion:
The purpose of this HUD required public hearing is to gather community input, incorporate citizen participation and complete the tasks necessary in the creation of the 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan by:
1. Receiving citizen and agency comments regarding the City’s needs and strategies for the upcoming 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan, including comments regarding proposed projects for FY 2024-2025, as required by HUD guidelines in the City of Victorville’s Citizen Participation Plan; and
2. Allowing prospective applicants for FY 2024-2025 CDBG/HOME grant funds an opportunity to share their needs.
ESTIMATED FUNDING:
The City is estimated to receive a 2024-2025 CDBG allocation amount of $1,381,396 and a HOME allocation of $605,850, based on 2023-2024 grant allocations. As of this writing, the 2024-2025 Federal budget has not been approved and HUD states that the grant amounts may change depending upon their final, actual appropriation. An example, the current fiscal year 2023-2024 funding is provided in Attachment C. Additionally, the noted amounts are anticipated to remain consistent annually over the course of the 5-year ConPlan with slight increases or decreases possible based upon historic fluctuations in funding allocations due to various factors including population and need.
1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The City is required to utilize CDBG grant funding to “provide decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities.” It is required 3 5
2 4
by the Federal government that “the aggregate use of CDBG funds....shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons ....”. This grant has funding restrictions for certain functions (Public Services - 15%, and Administration - 20% maximum allocations), but generally can be distributed as follows:
•Public Service Projects - $207,209 (15% of Total CDBG Allocation) •Construction/Other Projects - $897,908 (65% of Total CDBG Allocation) •Administration - $276,279 (20% of Total CDBG Allocation) TOTAL - $1,381,396 (2024-2025 estimated CDBG Allocation)
2. HOME
The City is required to utilize HOME grant funding to “provide decent affordable housing to lower-income households; expand the capacity of nonprofit housing providers; strengthen the ability of state and local governments to provide housing; and leverage private-sector participation.” HOME funds also have a minimum 15% funding restriction that is dedicated to Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs), and an Administration cap of 10%. The City of Victorville and the Town of Apple Valley have established a consortium in order to meet the population threshold for HOME entitlement status. Pursuant to HUD’s 2023 HOME Consortia Participating Members Percentage Report, Victorville’s funds will be distributed as follows:
•Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) - $90,878 (Required 15% minimum of HOME Allocaiton)
•Construction/Other Projects - $454,388 (75% of HOME Allocation) •Administration - $60,584 (Maximum 10% of HOME Allocaiton) TOTAL - $605,850 (2024-2025 estimated HOME Allocation)
In addition, the HOME Program requires that federal HOME funds be matched 25% with non-federal forms of subsidy. Unless HUD waives the local match requirement, applicants for HOME funding will be responsible for providing match contributions. As of the current fiscal year, the Apple Valley/Victorville Consortium has been deemed fiscally distressed by HUD and this matching fund requirement has been waived as it has been in previous funding cycles.
APPLICATIONS, PROJECT TYPES AND FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Applications
The deadline to submit applications for FY 2024-2025 funding was January 19, 2024 from non-profit agencies and City departments. Staff has begun evaluating the applications to determine eligibility using the federal CDBG and HOME criteria.
2. Project Types
Public Service Projects are defined by the population they serve and may only be 3 5
2 4
funded by CDBG. Most public service projects are determined to be eligible based on the federal guidelines that presume certain groups are eligible, such as the homeless, victims of domestic violence, senior adults, certain at-risk groups such as the unemployed and youth, and low/moderate income families. CDBG regulations place a 15% cap on funds that can be allocated to Public Service Projects. Staff anticipates a total of $207,209 will be available to fund projects defined as Public Service Projects in the upcoming 2024-2025 program year.
Construction and Other Community Development Projects are generally limited by their location and are funded with CDBG. A target area map determined by the 2020 census defines those areas where there exists a concentrated portion of the low and moderate-income population, or an area severely affected by blight. A map of the City's current CDBG targeted areas has been included with this agenda item as Attachment D. A project is eligible under this funding type when it demonstrates that the immediate or target area benefits from the project or activity.
During the subject program year approximately $897,908 is available to fund projects defined as Construction and Other Community Development Projects.
Housing Projects may also be funded from this category.
Housing Projects may be funded with either CDBG or HOME funds. CDBG regulations limit housing activities to “providing or improving permanent residential structures which, upon completion will be occupied by low and moderate-income persons”. HOME regulations are designed to provide affordable housing to low and very-low-income households. HUD requires a minimum of 15% of the total HOME allocation to be reserved for CHDO activities. Approximately $454,388 in HOME funds is anticipated to be available to fund non-CHDO housing projects. Housing Projects may also be funded utilizing the $897,908 in CDBG funds from the Construction and Other Community Development Projects category listed above.
3. Funding Considerations
Funding caps are established by statute for administration (CDBG - 20% and HOME – 10% maximum of the total grant award), public service projects (CDBG - 15% maximum of the total grant award) and CHDO projects (HOME – 15% minimum). Although these fundings limits were previously waived in conjunction with associated but separate CDBG-CV funds (CDBG CARES Act funding in repsonse to the coronavirus pandemic), such waivers are not applicable to the subject CDBG & HOME funds being discussed.
A. Council Policy
On November 15, 1994 (amended April 4, 1995, May 1998 and January 15, 2019), the City Council adopted a policy that established guidelines for determining CDBG/HOME program and project priority. The policy states that Council is tasked with the responsibility of determining program and project priority as well as allocating funds during the fiscal year in which grant funds are available. In order to facilitate the annual allocation of funds, 3 5
2 4
the City Council designates two members of the Council to serve on the CPD Grants Subcommittee. Currently, Mayor Becerra and Mayor Pro Tem Harriman are appointed to serve on the CPD Grants Subcommittee, which will make recommendations to the City Council for formal review and approval in conjunction with the Annual Action Plan.
B. Religious Organizations
The White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships was established by former President George W. Bush through executive order on January 29, 2001. The initiative sought to strengthen faith-based and community organizations and expand their capacity to provide federally funded social services. HUD revised its regulations to remove barriers to the participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs. In general, no group of applicants competing for HUD funds should be subject to greater or fewer requirements than other organizations solely because of their religious character or affiliation. However, HUD does require that organizations clearly delineate eligible and ineligible uses of funds. HUD’s final rule stipulates that a recipient organization may not use direct HUD funds to support inherently religious activities, such as prayer, worship, religious instruction, or proselytization.
C. Fair Housing
Affirmatively furthering fair housing is a legal requirement that federal grantees advance the purposes of the Fair Housing Act of 1968. There are no requirements for minimum funding levels, or funding caps for this activity.
The City’s responsibilities include identifying barriers to fair housing and taking appropriate actions to overcome the effects of those barriers. This activity is generally contracted to organizations that principally offer fair housing services as well as landlord/tenant mediation, such as Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. Additionally, included in the 2022-2026 ConPlan is an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, which along with the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Plan adopted in conjunction with the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element will be incorporated into the Annual Action Plan by ensuring compliance with applicable goals.
CPD Grants Subcommittee and Allocation of Funds:
The CPD Grants Subcommittee will work with staff to review applications and provide their funding recommendations prior to the adoption of the 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan.
It is anticipated that the City Council will award grant amounts as part of the adoption of the Annual Action Plan during a public meeting anticipated to occur in May 2024.
Staff is available to answer questions as needed.
3 5
2 4
Attachments: A. 2022-2026 ConPlan
B. Citizen Participation Plan
C. 2023-2024 CDBG/HOME Allocations
D. CDBG Target Area Map
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT A
2022-2026 Consolidated Plan
Draft Consolidated Plan
2022-2026
Draft Annual Action Plan
FY 2022– 2026
This page is intentionally left blank.
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Debra Jones
Mayor
Leslie Irving
Mayor Pro Tem
Elizabeth Becerra
Council Member
Blanca Gomez
Council Member
This page is intentionally left blank.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .........................................................2 ES-05 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 2 The Process ........................................................................ 9 PR-05 Lead & responsible agencies ......................................................................................................9 Needs Assessment ........................................................ 43 NA-05 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 43 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment ..................................................................................................... 45 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs ....................................................... 54 Housing Market Analysis ............................................ 62 MA-05 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 62 MA-10 Number of Housing Units ......................................................................................................... 67 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing ..................................................................... 72 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets ....................................................... 76 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households ........................................................................................................................................................ 85 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation, Victorville ................................................................................................. 87 Strategic Plan .................................................................. 89 SP-05 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 89 SP-10 Geographic Priorities ...................................................................................................................... 91 SP-25 Priority Needs ..................................................................................................................................... 92 SP-35 Anticipated Resources ................................................................................................................. 98 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure ............................................................................................. 101 DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE ii
SP-45 Goals Summary .............................................................................................................................. 105 SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards ....................................................................................................... 107 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy ................................................................................................................. 109 SP-80 Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................... 111 2022-2023 Action Plan .................................................113 AP-15 Expected Resources ...................................................................................................................... 113 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................. 115 AP-35 Projects ................................................................................................................................................. 117 AP-38 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................... 119 AP-50 Geographic Distribution ........................................................................................................... 129 AP-85 Other Actions................................................................................................................................... 130 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements .........................................................................................133
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 2
Executive Summary
ES-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
The City of Victorville is a growing and vibrant community conveniently located between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Incorporated in 1962, the City has grown from 8,110 residents in an area of 9.7 acres to over 128,000 residents in 74.16 acres. The City has long been part of essential transportation corridors, including Route 66 and Interstate 15. Pride of place is evident in the clean air, mountain vistas and big skies, and pride of people is evident in the strong entrepreneurial spirit, and commitment to neighbors through volunteerism. Victorville has evolved and experienced significant growth in population and economic activity in the last 60 years.
The City of Victorville prepared the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, with select analyses required to receive federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The Consolidated Plan provides the U nited States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with a comprehensive assessment of the City’s housing and community development needs and outlines the City’s priorities, objectives, and strategies for the investment of CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Consortium funds to address these needs over the next five years, beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2027.
The City of Victorville and the Town of Apple have formed the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium. Thi s strategy enables the City and Town to access HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds and make more affordable housing resources available to residents. Apple Valley serves as the lead agency for coordinating the Co nsortium’s Consolidated Planning process and submission. Each jurisdiction is responsible for administering its own CDBG program, while the Town of Apple Valley administers the HOME program for both jurisdictions. HOME objectives and goals are determined by both jurisdictions through an extensive analysis of housing needs for low er income residents, as specified by the program regulations. Each jurisdiction is also responsible for preparing its own Annual Action Plan and Consolidated Annual Perf ormance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
The City and Consortium receive CDBG and HOME funds from HUD on a formula basis each year, and in turn, awards grants and loans to nonprofit, for -profit, public organizations, and residents for programs and projects in fu rtherance of this Plan.
These programs provide for a wide range of eligible activities to address the needs of Victorville residents.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 3
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program with three primary objectives against which HUD evaluates the Consolidated Plan and the City’s performance. Those primary objectives are decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities for low - and moderate- income persons. The CDBG regulations require each activity meet one of the following national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate-income persons; or
• Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or • Meet other community development needs having a particular urge ncy (usually the result of a natural disaster).
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME)
The Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 created the HOME program to expand the supply of affordable housing for low - and moderate-income households. Often used in partnership with local nonprofit housing development organizations, the HOME program can support a wide range of affordable housing activities, including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating rental and housing ownership to low- and moderate-income people. Additionally, HOME funds are used to fund the City’s Senior Home Repair Program.
For the 2022 -2023 Program Year, it is es timated the City will receive $ 1,447,740 of CDBG funds and it is estimated the Consortium will receive $783,168 in HOME funds.
When combined with available prior year resources, the 202 2-2023 Action Plan allocates $1,683,386 of CDBG funds, and $538,967 of HOME funds to program activities listed below that will be implemented from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023.
2022-2023 CDBG Public Service Activities
Assistance League of Victor Valley: Operation School Bell $23,639 Child Advocates of San Bernardino County $10,000
Family Assistance Program $11,820
Greater Hope Foundation for Children $19,699
High Desert Homeless Services $31,515
Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board $28,000
Millionaire Mind Kids $10,000
Moses House Ministries $20,369
Partners Against Violence $15,760
Rock'n Our Disabilities Foundation $22,720
Victor Valley Domestic Violence $23,639
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 4
2022-2023 CDBG & HOME Capital Activities
High Desert Homeless Services $300,000
Route 66 Victor Valley Revitalization $150,000
Victor Valley Community Services Council $34,000
City of Victorville – Blight Abatement $104,000
City of Victorville – Code Enforcement $250,000
City of Victorville – Demolition $175,145.72
City of Victorville – Planning: Residential Rehabilitation Program $200,000 City of Victorville – Public Works – Graffiti Abatement *$0.00 City of Victorville – Planning – Senior Home Repair Program (HOME) $131,561 Hughes Training and Development (HOME) $272,665
* Program will be funded up to requested $12,500 in surplus allocation of funds 2022-2023 Program Administration Activities
CDBG Program Administration $289,548
HOME Program Administration $26,948
Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan needs assessment Overview
The priority needs and goals identified in the Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City’s Resident and Stakeholder Surveys and the housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (eCon Planning Suite). Data supplied by HUD includes the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same period .
Other sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies and cited publicly available data.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Plan:
• Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Human services
• Housing programs
• Accessibility and mobility
• Economic Development
Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG and HOME programs to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low - and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 5
activities aligned with the following measurable goals included in the Strategic Plan section of this Plan:
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 6
Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome
Indicator
1. Provide suitable
living
environments for
residents
- Affordable
Housing
Homeless
- Non-Homeless
Special Needs
- Non-Housing
Community
Development
- Supportive services
for the homeless and
those at risk of
homelessness
- Human services
Public service
activities for low/
moderate income
housing benefit:
17,490 people, 2,500
households, 135
structures
2. Decent and
affordable
housing for
consortia
residents
Affordable
Housing
Housing programs Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation: 300
household housing
units
3. Expand access to
essential services
and amenities
Non-housing
community
development
Accessibility and
mobility
Economic
Development
Public Facility of
Infrastructure other
than Low /
Moderate-Income
Housing Benefit:
500 people
Businesses – 10
business
Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary
Evaluation of past performance
The investment of HUD resources during the 201 7-2021 Program Years resulted in measurable accomplishments that contributed to positive outcomes for Victorville residents. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City of Victorville and its partners to:
• Preserve and improve the existing housing stock.
• Provide fair housing services.
• Provide quality supportive services to elderly residents and those with disabilities.
• Provide support services such as battered and abused spousal programs and referral and case management services to people with special needs. • Contribute to the well -being of individuals, families, and neighborhoods by providing a wide array of public services to Victorville residents; and • Support a continuum of services in support of City and County efforts to end homelessness.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 7
There were some delays to construction projects toward the end of the five-year cycle due to the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). To limit spread of COVID-19 and protect City staff and residents from the virus in person interactions were suspended limiting the City’s ability to conduct job walks or enter construction contracts. Construction projects resumed in 2021-2022.
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The Consolidated Plan regulations at 24 CFR Part 91 provide the citizen participation and consultation requirements for the development of the Consolidated Plan. Chief among those requirements is the need to consult with the Continuum of Care (CoC) to address homelessness , Public Housing Authorities (PHA), business leaders, civic leaders and public or private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services, employment, or education needs of low -income individuals and families, homeless individuals an d families, youth and/or other persons with special needs. Information supplied by these community stakeholders, together with the data supplied by HUD resulted in a well -informed planning document that reflects the housing, community and economic development needs and priorities for the City of Victorville over the next five years.
From October 2021 through April 2022, the City’s Planning Department held a community meeting, two public hearings, a public meeting, focus groups and surveys to afford citizens and local and regional organizations representing low - and moderate-income residents the maximum feasible opportunity to provide input on the housing and community development needs of the City. The resident and stakeholder surveys solicited input from re sidents and employees working in Victorville. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in thei r experience for various types of improvements that could potentially be addressed with CDBG and HOME resources. The focus groups were organized by interest group:
food banks and homeless services; youth and education services; public servicers; veterans, elderly and disables services; and faith-based organizations. The community meetings and were publicly noticed.
Summary of public comments
A community meeting and two public hearing were held to receive comments on the housing and community development needs. The community meeting was held on November 17, 2021, at 10 am and 6 pm. The public hearings were held on February 15, 2022, and April 19, 2022 at 6 pm Participants were encouraged to join remotely via the video conferencing application Zoom.
A public meeting to discuss applications received in response to the City’s Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 2022-2023 CDBG funds was held before the Victorville Community Development and Planning Grants Subcommittee on March 3, 2022.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 8
The City of Victorville received two written comments and 12 participants spoke at the February 15 public hearing. All comments were accepted and entered into the record.
A summary of these comments may be found in Appendix B.
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them
All comments and views received by the City in the development of the Consolidated Plan were accepted and taken into consideration in the development of the Consolidated Plan.
Summary
Examination of 201 3-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, in addition to local data, as well as consultation with citizens and stakeholders revealed five high priority needs to be addressed through the investment of an anticipated $ 7.1 million of CDBG and $3.9 million HOME Consortium funds over the five -year period of the Consolidated Plan. The investment of CDBG and HOME funds in eligible activities shall be guided principally by the three goals of the Strategic Plan. Activities submitted for consideration in response to any solicitation or Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) process must conform with one of the four Strategic Plan strategies and the associated action-oriented, measurable goals to receive consideration for CDBG or HOME Consortium funding.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 9
The Process
PR-05 LEAD & RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES
1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source
The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator VICTORVILLE Planning Development
HOME Administration –
Lead Agency
Apple Valley Housing & Community
Development
HOME Administration –
Participating Jurisdiction
Victorville Planning Department
Table 2– Responsible Agencies
Narrative
The 2022-2026 Consolidate Plan for the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium and the City of Victorville was prepared by MDG Associates, Inc. under contract to the respective jurisdictions. The Town of Apple Valley serves as the lead agency for coordinating the Consolidated Planning and submission process and administers the HOME program for both jurisdictions. The City of Victorville is a participating jurisdiction in the Consortium. The City’s Planning Department is the lead agency responsible for administering its CDBG program and shall be responsible for all grants planning, management, and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD regulations and City policy throughout the implementation of the Consolidated Plan and each of the five Annual Action Plans and Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPER).
In the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City implemented a comprehensive citizen participation and consultation process and conducted a needs assessment and market analysis to ide ntify levels of relative need regarding affordable housing, homelessness, special needs, and community development. This information was gathered through consultation with public officials and local agencies, public outreach and community meetings, review of demographic and economic data, and housing market analysis.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 10
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Alejandro Jauregui, Senior Planner
City of Victorville
Planning Department
14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, CA 92392
(760) 955-5132
Orlando Acevedo, Director
Town of Apple Valley
Business Development and Communications
14955 Dale Evans Parkway, Apple Valley, CA 92307
(760) 240-7915
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 11
PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(l) and 91.315(l)
1. Introduction
In the preparation of the Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with public and private departments and agencies and social service and non- profit organizati ons to understand the community’s needs and available resources. The City met with several department representatives to provide information about the Consolidated Plan and its processes. Department staff provided input on how CDBG resources could be used and leveraged to provide services. Focus group participants highlighted the priority needs in general terms and specific to the population.
Other jurisdictions within the region were contacted and consulted, including the Town of Apple Valley. As the HOME Consortium lead agency, the Town of Apple Valley held joint community meetings as well as strategy sessions to determine priority use of HOME funding over the next 5 years. During the joint consultation process, the Consortium provided detailed informat ion about the Con solidate Plan and HOME program, the Consortiums distribution of funds and current projects using HOME funds.
The City of Victorville recognizes Victorville residents are the center of and partners in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The Citizen Participation Plan establishes a means by which citizens, public agencies and other interested parties can actively participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan and the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report.
Opportunities to participate in the planning process were provided throughout.
Special effort was made to engage low-income persons. City efforts to make opportunities for engagement known include:
• Public notices printed in the local newspaper in English and Spanish. • Public notices posted on the City’s website in English and Spanish. • Public notices posted at community facilities including library in English and Spanish.
• Web-based surveys links were shared widely through the City’s social media accounts and blast and direct email and hard copies were available at the City Planning Department.
• Stakeholder meetings were targeted to specific groups; especially those of people with disabilities, disadvantaged youths, homeless people.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 12
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).
The City recognizes the importance of careful coor dination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG program. As a result, during the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with organizations that provide assisted housing, health services and other community - focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys, invitations to community meetings, and follow-up in-person interviews where appropriate.
The City further recognizes the importance of continued coordination and alignment during the upcoming five -year planning period with these organizations and agencies. The City will reinforce these partnerships through the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds each year and through technical assistance provided to subrecipients.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness To help prevent homelessness and protect at- risk populations the City supports and participates in the San Bernardino County Continuum of Care System and the San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership. The City plans to fund CoC member, High Desert Homeless Ser vices, over the 5 -year planning period to assist in efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS
The City is not a direct recipient of ESG funding. However, it is a participating jurisdiction in the CoC and works closely with the homeless provider system to create funding policies and procedures for ESG.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 13
2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities 1 Agency/Group/Organization Rock’n Our Disabilities
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services - Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents, service providers and
selected department s from each member
jurisdiction. Engagement was conducted through
surveys, community meetings and focus group
interviews.
2 Agency/Group/Organization Orenda Foundation's Veterans Project Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services - Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Economic Development
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents, service providers and
selected departments from each member
jurisdiction. Fo cus groups were conducted with
nearly 30 organizations representing special needs
populations, affordable housing and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews were
also conducted A complete list of organizations is
provided as an attachment.
3 Agency/Group/Organization Victor Valley Family Resource Center Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 14
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents, service providers and
selected departments from each member
jurisdiction. Engagement was con ducted through
surveys, community meetings and focus group
interviews.
4 Agency/Group/Organization City of Victorville
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted an
d what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents , service providers and
selected departments from each member
jurisdiction. Focus groups were conducted with
nearly 30 organizations representing special needs
populations, affordable housing,
and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews were
also conducted A complete list of organizations is
provided as an attachment.
5 Agency/Group/Organization High Desert Second Chance Food Bank Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 15
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents, service providers and
selected departments from each member
jurisdiction. Engagement was con ducted through
surveys, community meetings and focus group
interviews.
6 Agency/Group/Organization A Better Way
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
In order to obtain a comprehensive assessment
of the needs and priorities within the
community, the Consolidated Plan process
included consultation with Consortium
residents, service providers and selected
departments from each member jurisdiction.
Focus groups were conducted with nearly 30
organizations representing special needs
populations, affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
7 Agency/Group/Organization City of Victorville
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Planning Organization
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 16
How was th e
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process include d
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
8 Agency/Group/Organization Inland SoCal 211+ (United Way) Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
10 Agency/Group/Organization Apple Valley PAL
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 17
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
11 Agency/Group/Organization Catholic Charities - San Bernardino Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
12 Agency/Group/Organization Legal Aid of San Bernardino Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 18
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
13 Agency/Group/Organization Western University
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Mental Health Agency/Facility
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
14 Agency/Group/Organization No Drugs America
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 19
15 Agency/Group/Organization Assistance League of Victor Valley Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
17 Agency/Group/Organization Inland SoCal United Way
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Elderly
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive asses sment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, commu nity
meetings and focus group interviews.
18 Agency/Group/Organization A Greater Hope
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Foster Care Agency/Facility
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
To obtain a comprehen sive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 20
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with near ly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
19 Agency/Group/Organization Combat Veteran Motorcycle Association Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services - Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
20 Agency/Group/Organization Inland SoCal United Way
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan proce ss included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 21
development. Key one -one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
21 Agency/Group/Organization APPLE VALLEY
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Other government - Local
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
22 Agency/Group/Organization A Core Solution
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special n eeds populations,
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 22
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
24 Agency/Group/Organization High Desert Community Foundation Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Business Leader, Financial backer
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one -one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
25 Agency/Group/Organization Set Free Church
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Faith-based Organization
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 23
26 Agency/Group/Organization Lutheran Social Services of So Cal Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
27 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Housing & Mediation Board Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
28 Agency/Group/Organization Family Assistance Program
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Disabilities; Services-Homeless
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 24
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
29 Agency/Group/Organization Moses House Ministries
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Employment; Services-children under
5 What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
30 Agency/Group/Organization Victor Valley Community Services Council Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Elderly; Services-Disabilities
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 25
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one -one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
31 Agency/Group/Organization TOAV Park and Recreation
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagemen t was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
32 Agency/Group/Organization St. John of God Health Care Services Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 26
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
33 Agency/Group/Organization Feed My Sheep
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless; Other
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
34 Agency/Group/Organization High Desert Homeless Services Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Hmls/Formerly Hmls Resident (ESG Grantees);
Services - Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
In order to obtain a comprehensive assessment
of the needs and priorities within the
community, the Consolidated Plan process
included consultation with Consortium
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 27
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
residents, service providers and selected
departments from each member jur isdiction.
Focus groups were conducted with nearly 30
organizations representing special needs
populations, affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
36 Agency/Group/Organization Greater Hope Foundation for Children Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Child Welfare Agency
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
37 Agency/Group/Organization Spectrum/ Charter Communications Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Broadband ISP
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 28
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
38 Agency/Group/Organization San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Continuum of Care; Regional Organization
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one inte rviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
39 Agency/Group/Organization City of Victorville
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Emergency Management Agency; Local
Government
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensi ve assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through survey s, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 29
40 Agency/Group/Organization Department of Housing and Urban Development
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Federal Government
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Economic Development
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing specia l needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
41 Agency/Group/Organization City of Victorville
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Floodplain Management Agency; Water
District/Agency
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
42 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority County of San Bernardino Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Public Housing Authority
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 30
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one -one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
43 Agency/Group/Organization Victor Valley Global Medical Center Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Health; Health Agency
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted thr ough surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
44 Agency/Group/Organization Foothill AIDS Project
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-HIV/AIDS
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan proce ss included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 31
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
45 Agency/Group/Organization High Desert Detention Center Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Public Funded Institution
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted thr ough surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
46 Agency/Group/Organization BLM, Barstow Field Office
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 32
47 Agency/Group/Organization Coachella Valley Housing Coalition Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a co mprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted throu gh surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
48 Agency/Group/Organization CA HCD
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
State Government
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 33
Table 3– Agencies, groups, organizations who participated Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting
No agency type was excluded from the final stakeholder list.
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan
Name of
Plan
Lead
Organization
How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with
the goals of each plan?
Continuum
of Care
County of San
Bernardino
The County of San Bernardino is a Continuum of Care
applicant and conducts homeless counts, surveys of the
homeless population, and strategic planning to end
homelessness. Consistent with the goals of the CoC, the City of Victorville’s Strategic Plan will provide support to nonprofits that meet the social services needs of the City residents with an emphasis on the homeless.
Housing
Elements
City of Victorville
/ Town of Apple
Valley
Based on the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
set forth by the State of California, The Housing Element is the City's chief policy document for the development of affordable and market rate housing. Consistent with this policy document, the City will maintain and enhance the quality of existing residential ne ighborhoods and
promote and encourage fair housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community, regardless of age,
sex, ethnic background, physical condition, or family size.
Table 4– Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l)) As a Consortium, the Town of Apple Valley and the City of Victorville coordinate housing and community development strategies among the jurisdictions. The Consortium and City collaborate with State and local agencies such as jurisdictions in the San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership (S BCHP); t he California Department of Housing and Community Development regarding the periodic update of the Housing Elements ; and neighboring jurisdictions and the County for any partnering opportunities to address housing and community development needs in the region.
The City’s collaborative and cooperative planning partnerships with governmental, nonprofit, and private entities strategically ensure the needs of low - and moderate-
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 34
income needs are meet, issues are comprehensively evaluated and thoroughly addressed. Aside from these partnerships, other departments within the City are involved in collaborating and cooperating with state and federal entities in planning efforts.
PR-15 Citizen Participation - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c)
1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation
Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting In preparation for the Consolidated Plan the City followed the established processes of the Citi zen Participation Plan to ensure broad community engagement . At each step the City worked to ensur e low- and moderate-income residents, members of minority groups, agencies involved in the provision of services to these populations, and others who are dire ctly impacted by the programs and activities supported by the Consolidated Plan programs had the opportunity to be actively involved. The Citizen Participation Plan, Consolidated Plan, Action Plan, C onsolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (C APER) and the Assessment of Fair Housing Choice are posted on the City website at:
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/city-
departments/development/planning/grant-programs/2022-2027-consolidated-plan and a hard copy will be available for review in the City Planning Department for 30 days from March 21 to April 19, 2022.
To assist in identification of priority needs citizens were engaged through community meetings, surveys, public hearings, and individual meetings. Citizens wh o participated in the process received extensive information about the Consolidated Plan, citizen participation process, HUD requirements for an entitlement City, the amount of funding the City anticipates receiving and how those funds can be used by the City. Residents were given the opportunity to provide City staff with their input on the prioritization of community needs. Each of these efforts, including review of HUD Data and relevant policy documents, assisted the City in its goal setting efforts.
Two publicly noticed meetings were held at different stages in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The community meeting on November 17, 2021, and the public hearing February 15, 2022. Twelve residents spoke at the February meeting and two written comments were received. All comments were accepted and entered into the record. A summary of these comments may be found in Appendix B.
In November 2021, the City opened surveys to afford citizens and local and regional organizations representing low -and-moderate income persons the maximum feasible opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 35
of the City. The surveys solicited input from residents and employees working in Victorville. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in their neighborhoods for various types of improvements which could potentially be addressed using federal funds, such as CDBG and HOME allocations. The electronic survey was made available on the City’s website and across its social media platforms.
It was also made available in hard copy at the City’s Planning Department. The survey was available in English and in Spanish, as recommended in the Citizen Participation Plan. The resident survey received 25 responses and the stakeholder survey received four responses.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 36
Citizen Participation Outreach
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
1 Newspape
r Ad
Non-targeted/
broad
community
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify other
language:
Spanish
Newspaper ad
published
November 5,
2021, in the
Daily Press
announcing
two
Community
Meetings to
receive input
on the
preparation of
the City's 2022-
2026
Consolidated
Plan and the
2022-2023
Action Plan.
No
comments
were
received.
No
comments
were
received.
Not applicable.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 37
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
2 Public
Meeting
Non-targeted/
broad
community
Publicly
noticed
Community
Meeting on
November 15,
2021 at 10:00
a.m. and 6:00
p.m. at the
Victorville
Activity Center,
15075 Hesperia
Road,
Victorville, CA
92395
Residents in
attendance
received a
presentatio
n on the
Consolidate
d Plan and
discussed
housing and
community
developmen
t needs with
City Staff.
All
comments
were
accepted.
Not applicable.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 38
4 Internet
Outreach
Non-
targeted/broa
d community
The Resident
Survey was
available online
and in paper
format at the
Planning
Department
from
November 17 to
January 14,
2022. The City
advised
residents and
stakeholders of
the availability
of the survey via
email to
stakeholders,
posting on the
City websi te,
Facebook,
Twitter,
announcement
s at City Council
meetings, and
during the
Community
Meetings.
The purpose
of the survey
was to allow
all residents
the
opportunity
to provide
their
assessment
of the level
of need in
Victorville
for a variety
of housing ,
community,
and
economic
developmen
t activities.
In total, 25
residents
completed
the survey. A
summary of
all survey
responses is
provided in
Appendix B.
All survey
responses
were
accepted.
https://forms.office.com/r/x6XvJ4c1dr
5 Newspape
r Ad
Non-targeted/
broad
community
Newspaper ad
published
February 4,
2022 in the
Daily Press
No public
comments
were
received.
No
comments
were
received.
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/agend
as/-fsiteid-1
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 39
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify other
language:
Spanish
announcing
Public Hearing
to receive input
on the
preparation of
the City's 2022-
2026
Consolidated
Plan and the
2022-2023
Action Plan.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 40
6 Public
Hearing
Non-
targeted/broa
d community
A public
hearing was
held before the
Victorville City
Council on
February 15,
2022, in the
Victorville City
Council
Chamber and
live via Zoom to
receive input
on the highest
priority
housing,
community
and economic
development
needs in
Victorville. This
meeting took
place prior to
the publication
of the draft
2022-2026
Consolidated
Plan
for public
review and
comment.
12 verbal
and two
written
comments
were
delivered. 11
comments
were in
support of
CDBG
public
services
application
submitted
and one was
identifying
the need for
affordable
housing.
Not
applicable.
All
comments
were
accepted.
Not applicable.
7 Newspape
r Ad
Non-targeted/
broad
community
Newspaper ad
published on
March 21 2022
in the Daily
Press
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 41
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify other
language:
Spanish
announcing
the availability
of the draft
2022-2026
Consolidated
Plan, draft
2022-2023
Annual Action
Plan, and draft
Victorville
Analysis of
Impediments,
of Fair Housing
Choice for a 30-
day public
review and
comment
period to
include a
public hearing
before the
Victorville City
Council on
April 19, 2020.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 42
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
8 Public
Hearing
Non-
targeted/broa
d community
Public hearing
before the
Victorville City
Council on April
19, 2022, to
receive
comments on
the draft 2022-
2026
Consolidated
Plan, draft
2022-2023
Annual Action
Plan, and draft
Victorville
Analysis of
Impediments
to Fair Housing
Choiceprior to
adoption an d
submission to
HUD.
To be
determined
.
To be
determine
d
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/agend
as/-fsiteid-1
Table 5– Citizen Participation Outreach
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 43
Needs Assessment
NA-05 OVERVIEW
Needs Assessment Overview
The Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment examines housing, homelessness, non - homeless special needs, and non- housing community development needs. The housing needs assessment section evaluates household income, tenure (renter or owner), housing cost as a function of household income, disproportionate need amongst racial and ethnic groups and public housing needs. The homeless needs assessment examines the sheltered and unsheltered homeless population in San Bernardino County to inform Apple Valley -Victorville’s strategy to address homelessness during the next five years. The non-homeless special needs assessment section evaluates the needs of people who are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services. This population includes elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, and physically disabled persons, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of human trafficking, persons with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and victims of domestic violence. The non- housing community development needs assessment section discusses the need for public facilities, public infrastructure improvements and public services to benefit low- and moderate-income residents.
Methodology
To assess community needs, the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville examined data, held community meetings and focus groups, conducted a survey of residents and stakeholders, and consulted with experts and local stakeholders. The Needs Assessment primarily relies on the following sources of data:
• American Community Survey (ACS), 2013-2017, 5-year estimates • Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2013 -2017, 5 -year estimates
• 2020 Point-In-Time Homeless Count
The 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates and the 2013-2017, 5-year estimates were the most recent available complete datasets supplied through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Con Planning Suite planning framework.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 44
Consolidated Plan Focus Groups and Surveys for Residents and Stakeholders
The Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium held five virtual focus groups over the period of three days in mid -December 2021. The focus groups were promoted by the cities and facilitated by MDG. The five groups were as follows:
1. Food Banks and Homeless Services,
2. Education and Youth Services,
3. Public Services,
4. Veterans, Elderly and Disabled Services, and
5. Faith Based Organizations.
Some organizations participated in multiple focus groups because they serve multiple constituencies. In total, 29 unique people participated in the focus groups, excluding the facilitator and organizers.
Apple Valley and Victorville residents and stakehol ders had the opportunity to respond to the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan survey to rate the need and/or to identify highest priority need for public facilities, infrastructure, and services, housing facilities and services, business services. The tabulation of survey results from the 111 Apple Valley and 25 Victorville residents and four community stakeholders who responded to the surveys are integrated throughout the Needs Assessment (NA) and Market Assessment (MA) of Consolidated Plan and can be found in the following sections:
• Housing facility and service results – NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment, • Public facility, infrastructure, and service results – NA-50 Non -Housing and Community Development Needs,
• Discrimination in housing results – MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing, • Business service results – MA-45,
• Internet access, cost, type, and speed – MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing Occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households, and
• Disaster preparedness results – MA-65 Hazard Mitigation.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 45
NA-10 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Summary of Housing Needs
For the City of Victorville, the income levels are divided by different AMI levels corresponding with HUD income definitions as follows:
• 0-30 percent AMI: extremely low-income – just over 16 percent of all households; • 30-50 percent AMI: low-income – almost 15 percent of all households; • 50-80 percent AMI: moderate-income – just over 18 percent of all households; • 80-100 percent AMI: medium -income – approximately 10 percent of all households; and
• Greater than 10 0 percent AMI: upper- income – about 40 percent of all households.
The most common household type in Victorville is small family. About 49 percent of specific household types earn less than 80 percent AMI, with the highest rates of occurrence among households with one or more children 6 years of age or younger or 62 years of age or older.
Figure 1
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
According to ACS data in Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics - Victorville, Victorville’s population grew by 19 percent during the period between 2009 and 2017, increasing in number from 102,666 to 121,720 people. During this time, the number of households increased by 13 percent from 28,842 to 32,630 and the median
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 46
household income decreased from $51,372 to $47,895. According to the 2017 data, approximately 60 percent of all households in Victorville earn less than 100 percent of Area Median In come (AMI) and 49.3 percent of all households earn less than 80 percent of AMI.
Victorville
Demographics Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2017 % Change Population 102,666 121,720 19%
Households 28,842 32,639 13%
Median Income $51,372.00 $47,895.00 -7%
Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics - Victorville Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year) Table 7 - Total Households Table - Victorville – presents the number of different household types in Victorville for different levels of income. Small family households consist of two-to-four family members, while large family households have five or more persons.
Number of Households Table
Victorville
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-100%
AMI
>100%
AMI
Total Households 5,365 4,840 5,890 3,350 13,185
Small Family Households
(2 – 4 people) 2,510 2,340 2,780 1,435 7,045
Large Family Households
(5 or more people) 745 850 1,220 900 2,870
Household contains at least
one person 62-74 years of age 765 1,185 1,240 595 2,825 Household contains at least
one-person age 75 or older 515 565 640 215 790
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or
younger
1,740 1,430 1,720 779 3,335
Table 7 - Total Households Table - Victorville
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 47
Figure 2: Households with extremely low-income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 48
Figure 3: Households with low-income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 49
Figure 4: Households with moderate income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 50
Figure 5: Population Asian alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 51
Figure 6: Population Black/ African American alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 52
Figure 7: Population Hispanic origin (any race)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 53
Figure 8: Population White alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 54
NA-50 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities.
The City of Victorville was incorporated in 1962. It has grown from 8,110 residents in an area of 9.7 acres to over 128,000 residents in 74.16 acres. It has evolved and experienced significant growth in population and economic activity since incorporation. While new facilities and amenities continue to be added, older facilities require rehabilitation to address the changing needs of the community.
The City of Victorville has invested significan tly in community facilities. According to the City’s website, it provides a library, golf course, two activity, two community, and a sport center and 18 parks. Maintaining and expanding these amenities requires significant financial investment.
Responses to the Resident and Stakeholder Surveys and focus groups give insight into the needs and priorities of those who live and work in Victorville. Residents responded there is a high level of need and the highest priority for homeless facilities and youth centers. In focus groups private facilities offering youth and family programming, such as a YMCA, and a performing arts center were identified as needs.
CDBG public facility projects that meet CDBG eligibility requirements, align with a Strategic Plan goal and address a CDBG National Objective will be considered for funding in the five Annual Action Plans. The Strategic Plan includes a goal to improve public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low - and moderate-income people or those presumed under HUD reg ulations to be low - and moderate-income, such as elderly people and adults with disabilities . Some of the types of facilities and infrastructure that may require rehabilitation during the next five years include, but are not limited to community centers, senior centers, parks and recreational facilities.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 55
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified for public facilities were determined through Community Meetings, responses from the Consolidated Plan Survey and consultation with City officials. Over the next five years Victorville’s Strategic Plan will continue to prioritize additional or improved public facilities to enhance or maintain the high level of services and amenities available to residents.
Figure 9: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 56
Figure 10: Resident Survey
Figure 11: Stakeholder Survey
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements.
Infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, storm drains, sewers, driveway approaches, pedestrian crossing, and streetlights in CDBD target areas or to support a project that benefits an identifiable segment of the population comprised of low - and moderate-income residents or residents presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income must be developed and maintained. Infrastructure improvements are included as part of the Strategic Plan goal concerning City of Victorville Public Facilities Improvements should the need arise to modify existing infrastructure or install new infrastructure.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 57
Responses to the Resident Survey show public infrastructure improvements to streets/ alleys, drainage, and high-speed internet infrastructure represent the greatest combined high and moderate levels of need. The highest priority infrastructure improvements are high- speed internet, street lighting, street/ alley improvements and tree planting.
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified fo r public infrastructure improvements were determined in consultation with the City and Town residents, City of Victorville Public Works Departments, Community Services Departments, and affordable housing developers.
Figure 12: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 58
Figure 13: Resident Survey
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services.
1. Those in need of public services are diverse and numerous. The homeless and non-homeless special needs populations are described in the Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment sections 40 and 45. Focus group s with nonprofit service providers shed light on the current and daily challenges faced by homeless and non- homeless special needs populations in Apple Valley and Victorville. Most focus group participants believed the priority needs facing their community are as follows:Supportive services for the homeless and those as risk of homelessness,
2. Human services, and
3. Accessibility and mobility.
Participants shared the types of prog ramming they believed would most effectively address those needs as well as the gaps in homeless and youth services delivery systems. A handful of programming areas were identified across the focus groups.
Those areas are as follows:
1. Mental and behavioral health services, especially for children
2. Community support for youth and families in the form of youth programming, in the arts, the consequences of underage substance use, and positive attitudes and behaviors to prevent violence
3. Transportation, including paved roads and sidewalks and electric bike share
4. Education on public services and changing eligibility, service providers and resources available to service providers. Throughout the focus groups there was a recurring theme around the need for centralizat ion and formalization of networks.
The input from the focus groups is supported by the resident and stakeholder survey results. The top three highly and moderately needed public services and highest priority public services as indicated in the Resident Su rvey are the same: homeless,
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 59
mental health, and youth services. Mental health services and homeless emergency shelter were identified as the top two highest needed public services by the stakeholder survey.
How were these needs determined?
Public service needs are driven by the City’s desire to ensure high quality services are provided to maintain residents’ quality of life and to promote the well- being of all residents — particularly low- and moderate -income residents including youth, seniors, and people with special needs. These needs were determined based on contributions from focus groups, and resident and stakeholder surveys.
The Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium held five virtual focus groups over the period of three days in mid -December 2021. The focus groups were promoted by the cities and facilitated by MDG. The five groups were as follows:
1. Food Banks and Homeless Services,
2. Education and Youth Services,
3. Public Services,
4. Veterans, Elderly and Disabled Services, and
5. Faith Based Organizations.
These groups spoke directly to the need for specific services and the needs of homeless and non- homeless special needs populations. Some organizations participated in multiple focus groups because they serve multiple constituencies. In total, 29 unique people participated in the focus groups, excluding the facilitator and organizers.
Responses to the Resident Survey are presented in Figures 7, 8 and 9. As a result of the citizen participation and consultation process and in consideration of the local nonprofits the City of Victorville considers public services benefitting low - and moderate-income residents a high priority in their respective Strategic Plans.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 60
Figure 14: Resident Survey
Figure 15: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 61
Figure 16: Stakeholder Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 62
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 OVERVIEW
Housing Market Analysis Overview
This section of the Consolidated Plan evaluates housing market conditions in the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville independently as well as the Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium as a whole. The analysis includes housing supply, demand, condition, and cost. Apple Valley’s housing stock primarily consists of single -family detached residential dwellings (76 percent) and three -bedroom units (71 percent).
Victorville’s housing stock primarily consists of single -family detached residential dwellings (79 percent) and three-bedroom units (79 percent).
From December 2017 to December 2021, median home value in Apple Valley increased 53 percent from $ 252,000 to $ 386,000, and the median home value in Victorville increase 59 percent from $246,000 to $391,000, according to Zillow Home Value Index. As of 2017, the most common rental unit size in Apple Valley was two- bedrooms and in Victorville was three -bedrooms. During the December 2017 to December 2021 period, median monthly rent for a two-bedroom unit in Apple Valley increased 55 percent from $ 896 to $1,385, and the median monthl y rent for three - bedroom unit in Victorville increased 42 percent from $1,299 to $1,850, as reported by Zumper, a rental listing aggregator . As a result, Apple Valley and Victorville households have become increasingly cost-burdened. Data from 2013-2017 shows an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 80 percent of AMI.
Tables 10 and 11 of the Needs Assessment section of the Consolidate d Plan show 74 percent of households (19,649 households) in the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium earning 0-80 percent of AMI, are cost burdened— meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing — and 9,515 (41 percent) households are considered severely cost burdened, meaning they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Of the severely cost burdened households earning 0-80 percent of AMI , more than two thirds are renters. Of those severely cost burdened renter households, 94 percent (6,255 households) earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 63
Figure 17
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Five year estimates from the ACS and CHAS were evaluated to determine if a geographic concentration of housing problems, racial and ethnic minorities, and low- income households exist in the Victorville. The spatial units under consideration are census tracts. A concentration is defined as ten percent over the rate at which any of the circumstances identified above occur throughout the City as a whole. The thresholds are as follows:
• Low-income households 59.7 percent,
• One or more housing problem 39.2 percent, and
• Racial and ethnic minorities 82.6 percent
As seen in the concentration maps in the section there are multiple census tracts which exceed the thresholds identified above. Notably there are two census tract which exceed all three thresholds.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 64
Figure 18: Concentration of households with low-income
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 65
Figure 19: Concentration of households with multiple housing problems
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 66
Figure 20: Concentration of racial and ethnic minorities
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 67
MA-10 NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS
Introduction
According to 201 3-2017 ACS data, Victorville 79 percent of the housing stock is comprised of single -family detached housing (one -four units). Multifamily housing (five or more units) accounts for only two percent and one percent of total housing units in Victorville. This is the smallest portion of housing stock for Victorville.
Most owner -occupied housing units in Victorville are comprised of larger units containing three or more bedrooms (85 percent and 91 percent, respectively). There is more diversity of unit size in rental housing stock between two- and three-bedroom units in Victorville. The tables below indicate the number of residential properties in the City by property type, unit size and tenure.
City of Victorville
Property Type Number %
1-unit detached structure 27,950 79%
1-unit, attached structure 400 1%
2-4 units 1,935 5%
5-19 units 2,260 6%
20 or more units 1,545 4%
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc. 1,485 4%
Total 35,757 100%
Table 8 – Residential Properties by Unit Number
Figure 21
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 68
City of Victorville
Owners Renters
Number % Number %
No bedroom 150 1% 250 2%
1 bedroom 90 1% 1,130 7%
2 bedrooms 1,365 8% 3,749 25%
3 or more bedrooms 15,865 91% 10,035 66%
Total 17,470 100% 15,155 100%
Table 9 – Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Figure 22
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.
As of fall 2021, the City of Victorville monitors a total of 12 affordable housing projects, which were constructed or rehabilitated with federal subsidy contracts, received tax credits, and /or were financed by Redevelopment Agency (RDA) funds. The 12 projects consist of a total of 1,346 units, all but five of which are restricted to extremely/very low, low- and moderate-income households (under State HCD guidelines).
Like all places in the State of California, Victorville is challenged by a lack of resources to address its affordable housing needs due to the dissolution of all the State’s redevelopment agencies.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 69
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.
HUD requires the City to analyze federal, state and locally assisted housing units that may be lost from the City’s affordable housing stock. The expiration of affordability restrictions on government assisted rental units is the typical reason that affordable units convert to market rate and are “lost.” Much of the housing at -risk of conversion from affordable housing to market rate housing is predominantly reserved for lower income households.
Use restrictions, as defined by state law, means any federal, state, or local statute, regulation, ordinance or contract which as a condition of receipt of any housing assistance, including a rental subsidy, mortgage subsidy, or mortgage insurance , to an assisted housing development, establishes maximum limitations on tenant income as a condition of eligibility for occupancy.
Conversion Risk
Table 10: Subsidized Housing provides an inventory of affordable housing developments in Victorville, including funding sources, number of units, target populations, and earliest date of conversion to market- rate housing. Analysis shows, for the period ending May 2021 no units in either jurisdiction were at high risk of converting to market rate housing.
City of Victorville
Project/Address
Total
Subsidized
Units
Type of Subsidy Date of
Conversion
Rodeo Drive Apts. 99 Section 8, FHA 2065
Sherwood Villa Apts. 101 Section 8, FHA 2069
Northgate Village Apts. 68 Section 8, State, RDA 2060
Village Oak Apts. 116 Section 42 Tax Credit Units 2054
Northside Commons 82 Section 42 Tax Credit Units 2057
Kimberly Park Apts. 132 Section 42 Tax Credit Units 2034 Impressions at Valley Center 99 RDA, HOME, CTAC Perpetuity Village at Victorville 79 CTAC 2061
Casa Bella Family Apts. 286 CTAC 2063
Rodeo Meadows 48 CTAC/ RDA 2057
Rancho Seneca Apts. 200 CSCDA Bonds 2067
Desert Haven 31 NSP 2075
Table 10 – Subsidized Housing
Data Source: 2021-2029 Housing Element
Preservation and Replacement Options
At this point in time no units in Victorville are at risk of becoming unaffordable. In the future, when the Town and City encounter the challenge of maintaining the existing
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 70
affordable housing stock, they may consider preserving the existing assisted units or facilitating the development of new units. Each negotiation to pre serve affordable units is unique in the sense that each project’s ownership interests, and economic needs will vary, and the jurisdiction’s resources may be insufficient to preserve all expiring units. Depending on the circumstances of each project that includes at- risk units, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? The current availability of housing units in the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium does not meet the needs of the population. The re is a significant need for additional rental housing units — particularly zero, one-bedroom units, and those affordable to households earning less than 50 percent of AMI. According to the data discussed in the Needs Assessment, the most common housing problems in the Consortium are cost burden and overcrowding. There are 6,255 renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI that are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs (Table 11). Overcrowding, having more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, hal ls, or half -rooms, impacts 2,148 low- and moderate -income households in the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium, almost 76 percent of whom are renters (Table 12).
Describe the need for specific types of housing.
Of the 2,150 renter households in the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium who earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs:
• 3,305 are small, related households with four or fewer members • 1,135 are large, related households with five or more members • 880 are elderly households with one or more members over age 62 • 935 are other/single person households
This breakdown by tenure, income, cost burden and household type indicate a need for additional affordable zero - and one -bedroom rental units in the Apple Valley - Victorville Consortium.
Discussion
For decades, California’s housing market has been among the most expensive in the country, and those conditions persist in 2021 . Renting can take up a considerable amount of income, while purchasing a home may be out of reach for individuals. To afford median rent for a three -bedroom unit as of December 2021, a Victorville household needs to earn $38.54 per hour or work 119 hours pe r week at minimum wage of $13 per hour, which equates to about three full time jobs. These calculations were made using the same method as the National Low-Income Housing Coalition in
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 71
the Out if Reach series and using median rents from Zumper a rental list ing aggregator. Median rents are far greater than fair market rents and more accurately reflect the experience low- and moderate-income households are facing.
Figure 23
Data Source: 2021 Zumper Research (accessed 2/4/2022) and State of CA Minimum Wage Data
As noted in the City of Victorville’s 2021-2029 Housing Element, it is the City’s goal to encourage development of different housing types to meet the City’s different needs.
Over the next eight years the City will strive to meet the following housing goals:
• Maximize land utilization for residential development, • Preserve existing housing stock,
• Encourage more affordable housing units,
• Maximize solution for those experiencing or at risk of homelessness, • Encourage homeownership,
• Improve quality of life and promote placemaking, and
• Affirmatively further fair housing.
Through these efforts, the City will strive to maintain a healthy community that encourages family stability and economic growth.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 72
MA-15 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: COST OF HOUSING
Introduction
One of the most important factors in evaluating a community’s housing market is the cost of housing and whether the housing is affordable to households who live there or would like to live there. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to household income, a correspondingly high prevalence of housing cost burden and overcrowding will typically occur.
Table 11 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates – and Table 12 – Cost of Housing – indicate the median home value and contract rent (not including utility or other assoc iated costs). These values are self-reported by residents through the U.S. Census American Community Survey. However, in looking at more current housing sales and rental market data – the cost of housing has risen tremendously over the past five years.
According to Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, median rents for two- and three- bedroom units have increased from December 2017 to 2021. The 2017 average rents reported by Zumper significantly exceeded the median contract rent as reported by the ACS 2013-2017 estimates in the Cost of Housing table below.
Figure 24
Data Source: 2017-2021 Zumper Research (accessed 2/4/2022) Median home values have increased significantly since the last Consolidated Planning process. In 2017, according to ACS data, median home values in Victorville were d 31 percent below what they had been in 2009, prior to the mortgage -backed securities housing foreclosure crisis. By 2019, according to the same source, housing prices had still not rebounded to 2009 levels. According to the Zillow Home Value Index housing values increased 59 percent in Victorville from December 2017 to 2021, from $483,000 to $676,000, according to the Zillow Home Value Index. Based on this more current data, home values have exceeded 2009 amounts.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 73
Figure 25
Data Source: 2017-2021 Zillow Data
City of Victorville
Average Rent/ Unit Type Oct. 2017 Oct. 2021 Percent Change 2-bedroom $838 $1,455 74%
3-bedroom $1,299 $1,850 42%
Table 11 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed 2/4/2022)
City of Victorville
Cost of Housing Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2017 % Change Median Home Value $259,000 $177,600 -31%
Median Contract Rent $869 $995 14%
Table 12 – Cost of Housing
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year) Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? Housing cost burden and severe housing cost burden data from section NA -10 indicate there is an insufficient supply of affordable housing units in the Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium. Quantifying the number of additional affordable housing units needed to eliminate or significantly reduce cost burden and severe cost burden is complicated because there is no guarantee a household of a particular income level will occupy a unit affordable at their income level – even if the unit is available in the open marketplace.
There is an apparent need for 7,065 additional housing units affordable to households’ earning 0 -30 percent of AMI. At the 0 -50 percent of AMI level, there are 5,775 affordable units and 16,115 households in this income category – a shortfall o f 10,340 units. At the 0-80 percent of AMI level, there are 26,175 affordable units and 26,685 households in this income category – a surplus of 6,515 units. This is according to 2013- 2017 CHAS data concerning the supply of housing units in the City that are affordable
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 74
to households earning at or below 30, 50, 80 and 100 percent of AMI and 2013-2017 ACS data on household income.
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents?
Rental housing costs have increased steadily over the past five years – creating more pressure on extremely low -income households. According from Zumper (Table 11 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates ), a rental listing aggregator, average rents for a two- bedroom unit in Victorville increased from $838 to $1,455 on average, an increase of 74 percent and three-bedroom rents increased from $1,299 to $1,850 an increase of 42 percent over the last five years. These rents represent a significant burden for low- and moderate-income households struggling to remain housed. Home values increased significantly as well. In Victorville, from December 2017 to 2021 according to sales data supplied by Zillow (Figure 15), home values increase from $246,000 to $391,000, a rate of 59 percent. Based on this information and barring significant regional and national changes in economic conditions, the price of housing in Victorville is forecast to continue increasing during the period of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?
HOME rents, Fair Market rents, and Market rents were compared to median contract rents from 2019 to determine the financial impact on operating income. To produce or preserve affordable rental housing units that carry a minimum HOME affordability period of 20 years, significant levels of subsidy are required.
For Victorville the low HOME and market rate rent closest to the median contract rent was for four - and two-bedroom units. The foregone rent over a 20 -year period for a four-bedroom unit at low HOME rates was $5,040. The foregone rent over a 20 -year period for a two -bedroom unit at market rate was $14,160. Notably, a quarter of occupied rental units in the Town are two -bedroom and nine percent are one - bedroom and efficiency units. The high concentration of larger rental units may drive up the median rental contract and drive down the rental rate per square foot.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 75
Figure 26
Data Source: 2019 ACS, HUD Fair Market Rent 2019, 2019 Zumper Research,
Discussion
Economic expansion over the last decade and a lag in production of new housing units in Southern California have created a housing economy that is over -burdened.
As a result, Apple Valley and Victorville households have become increasingly cost - burdened. Data from 201 3-2017 shows an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 50 percent of AMI. Considering the scarcity of land and monetary resources available to create new affordable housing units, housing affordability is expected to remain a significant challenge in the next five years.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 76
MA-45 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ASSETS
Introduction
Non-housing community development needs includ e economic development and improvements to public facilities . Special economic development activities must meet a National Object ive by addressing low - or moderate-income residents, slum/ blight, or urgent need and be an eligible activity per 24 CFR 570.203. Public facilities assisted with CDBG must serve low - and moderate -income residents or those residents presumed by HUD to be low- and moderate-income. Such facilities include senior centers, community centers, facilities for victims of domestic violence, facilities for treatment of persons with HIV/AID S, and ADA improvements to public facilities throughout the City. During the implementation of the 2022 -2026 Strategic Plan, Victorville will use CDBG funds to develop the local economy and address these needs and provide a suitable living environment for low- and moderate-income people.
To expand economic opportunities for low - and moderate -income people and provide a pathway out of poverty, the Strategic Plan and the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan includes public services. These projects include getting clothing to school aged children, homeless shelter operations, providing behavioral health care to foster youth and their foster families, and exercise, cooking, and art classes for people with special needs.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 77
Economic Development Market Analysis
Victorville
Business by Sector Number
of
Workers
Number
of Jobs
Share of
Workers
Share
of
Jobs
Jobs
less
workers
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas
Extraction 450 22 1% 0% -1%
Arts, Entertainment,
Accommodations 4,615 4,335 14% 18% 4%
Construction 2,280 402 7% 2% -5%
Education and Health Care Services 7,122 6,981 22% 29% 7% Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 1,288 902 4% 4% 0%
Information 552 564 2% 2% 0%
Manufacturing 3,091 1,579 10% 7% -3%
Other Services 1,106 618 3% 3% 0%
Professional, Scientific,
Management Services 1,886 876 6% 4% -2%
Public Administration 0 0 0% 0% 0%
Retail Trade 5,145 5,828 16% 24% 8%
Transportation and Warehousing 3,144 1,077 10% 4% -6%
Wholesale Trade 1,616 760 5% 3% -2%
Total -- -- --
Table 13 - Business Activity
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Workers), 2017 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs)
Victorville
Labor Force
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 47,705
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 40,920
Unemployment Rate 14.2%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 29.48%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 7.35%
Table 14 - Labor Force
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 78
Victorville
Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business and financial 6,425
Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 2,025
Service 5,690
Sales and office 10,800
Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 4,320
Production, transportation and material moving 3,095
Table 15 – Occupations by Sector
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Victorville
Travel Time Number Percentage
< 30 Minutes 20,720 55%
30-59 Minutes 8,955 24%
60 or More Minutes 7,910 21%
Total 37,585 100%
Table 16 - Travel Time
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Victorville
Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian
Employed
Unemployed Not in Labor
Force
Less than high school graduate 4,585 1,125 5,620
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 9,645 1,405 6,785
Some college or Associates degree 14,290 1,420 7,165
Bachelor's degree or higher 5,830 460 1,320
Table 17 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 79
Victorville
Age
18–24
yrs
25–34
yrs
35–44
yrs
45–65
yrs
65+ yrs
Less than 9th grade 230 530 1,180 2,240 2,030
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,750 2,240 2,670 2,465 1,225 High school graduate, GED, or
alternative 3,930 6,120 4,765 6,945 2,865
Some college, no degree 4,755 6,110 4,320 6,845 2,835
Associates degree 580 2,540 895 2,270 955
Bachelors degree 260 1,280 1,465 2,065 690
Graduate or professional degree 10 655 720 1,480 375
Table 18 - Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Victorville
Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate $22,535
High school graduate (includes equivalency) $27,870
Some college or Associates degree $30,925
Bachelor's degree $47,680
Graduate or professional degree $61,560
Table 19 – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months by Educational Attainment Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
According to 2017 Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data, the top five major private employment sectors in Victorville are education and health care services (6,981 jobs), retail trade (5,828 jobs), arts, entertainment, accommodations (4,335 jobs), transportation and warehousing (1,077), and construction (402 jobs).
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ current employment data for San Bernardino County, selected for top industries, by number of jobs in Victorville offers a picture of employment trends over time. As seen in Figure 17 employment growth in transportation, warehousing and utilities appears to have been uninterrupted by COVID-19. All other top employing industries in V ictorville show a decrease in employment when COVID -19 hit. For the education and health services industry, which was experiencing a period of rapid growth, the decline in jobs was real, but set the industry back about a year. Arts and entertainment, tourism, and retail have been severely impacted by the pandemic throughout the country. These employment sectors had been steady since 2015 and in 2019 employment decreased significantly.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 80
Figure 27
Data Source: 2015-2020 County Employment by Industry CA EDD
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community
The business community in Victorville relies largely on a skilled workforce. Residents of Victorville identified employment training as the greatest need and highest priority in the city. Employers across all sectors, and especially those for which Victorville is a destination location or part of a larger logistics chain such as arts, entertainment and accommodations and manufacturing, require a well -functioning transportation system.
Figure 28: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 81
Figure 29: Resident Survey
Figure 30: Stakeholder Survey
Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.
The coronavirus pandemic has had a major and sustained impact on all sectors of the economy. It has both highlighted and increased the need for fast, reliable, and secure internet has increased across all sectors of the economy.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 82
In response to the COVID -19 pandemic, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Act authorized $.2.2 trillion to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID -19 pandemic. The City of Vi ctorville received $1,527,782 in CARES Act CDBG funds. These funds assisted households to make emergency rent, mortgage, and utility payments and to help small businesses prepare and respond to the virus.
Additionally, the City of Victorville received $33 ,500,000 in Federal American Rescue Plan Act funds. The first tranche of 16.75 million was received in June 2021 and the second tranche will be released in June 2022. City staff identified the following eligible activities and funding for each one:
Housing and Homelessness - $6 Million
o Outreach Programs
o Wellness Center Facility
Community Improvements - $9 Million
o Utility Assistance Program
o Self-Cleaning Restrooms
o Improve Public Facilities
Broadband - $8 Million
o WiFi at Victorville Parks and Community Centers
o New Infrastructure
Community & Small Business Recovery - $4 Million
o Hiring Bonuses
o Hazard Pay for Essential Workers
Water/Sewer/Storm Drain - $6 Million
o Water Well Maintenance/Repairs
o Reservoir Refurbishment
The first implemented program using ARPA funds was the City’s Past Due Utility Program, which assisted residents with their past due water bills. For 2022-2023 ARPA funds will be used to funds utility assistance programs, rental and mortgage assistance programs and food banks administered by non-profit organizations.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 83
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
Most employees in Victorville’s civilian labor force have some post-secondary education, almost 42 percent of the employed labor force has some college or Associates degree . Generally . T he skills and education of the current workforce correspond to the employment opportunities in Victor ville; however, the jobs and opportunities do not correspond to the number of available workers . In 2017, there were only two employment sectors where there were more jobs than workers. More than half the working population in Victorville travel more than half an hour to work.
Figure 31
Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.
The San Bernardino County Workforce Development Board provides strategic direction and relationships for the WDC. San Bernardino County Workforce Development Centers (WDC) are the primary source of workforce training available to residents of Victorville. The WDC is operated by America’s Job Centers of California.
The City of Victorville work with the San Bernardino County WCD and employers to secure on-the-job training when appropriate.
Victor Valley College (VVC) is a p ublic community college located in Victorville and serving Victorville, Hesperia, Apple Valley, Phelan and Adelanto. It is part of the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 84
California Community College System. VVC offers over Certificates in over 100 vocational subjects. The College is an important partner in educating and training the local workforce.
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy?
Yes, the City of Victorville participated in development of the San Bernardino County 2019 CEDS.
If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.
The City of Victorville’s CDBG program will support local economic growth by meeting extremely low-, low- and moderate-income and homeless residents where they are to improve quality of life and better position for access and engagement in economic opportunities. This will be achieved by supporting local nonprofit ser vice providers, including housing services, and support of the development and preservation of affordable housing.
Discussion
The highly contagious nature of COVID-19 and the scale of illness and death has had significant ripple effects on the economy. In the spring of 2020, unemployment rates in the United States reached the highest levels since the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) began recording this data. According to the BLS, unemployment rates peaked at 14.2 percent in San Bernardino County and 17 percent in Victorville in April 2020. Those rates have fallen to 5.2 and 8.2 percent, respectively, as of December 2021, unemployment is still above pre -pandemic levels. Health and safety guidelines and requirements continue to change as the co ronavirus evolves and the scientific community learns more about the virus. Employers and workers are required to constantly learn and reevaluate changing situations.
Another indication of the negative economic impact of the pandemic is the year over year decrease in California of personal consumption expenditures of over four percent from 2019 to 2020, as calculated by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). The BEA calculated San Bernardino County’s gross domestic product which inc rease from $96.7 million in 2019 to $97 million in 2020.
State level calculations, which are more current, show the negative economic impact cause by the pandemic. According to the BEA, in 2020, California GPD fell for the first time in ten years.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 85
MA-60 BROADBAND NEEDS OF HOUSING OCCUPIED
BY LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods.
Broadbandnow.com is a widely used source of information about internet availability throughout the county and reports Victorville residents have several options for broadband internet service. According to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) three percent of consumers only have access to one or fewer wired internet providers at their address and the average download speed is almost 194 megabits per second (mbps). The responses to the Resident Survey show a relatively low rate of connectivity given the FCC data. This could be due to the small sample size of the survey.
Figure 32:Resident Survey
Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.
According to the FCC, 97 percent of Victorville has access to at least two wired internet providers at their address. Throughout the City , residents are serviced by multiple internet service providers who offer high speed internet. Providers include, Spectrum, Viasat, HughesNet, Frontier Communications, T -Mobile, and Ultra. According to the Resident Survey, most pay $50 to $100 per month for internet service provided by Spectrum or Frontier.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 86
Figure 33:Resident Survey
Figure 34: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 87
MA-65 HAZARD MITIGATION, VICTORVILLE
Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change.
The City of Victorville’s Hazard Mitigation Plan has been approved by Cal OES, FEMA, and City Council. The Plan is based on extensive research and community engagement and intended to mitigate the effects of natural disasters and return to “the norm” soone r, while also building back better so the community is more advantageously positioned for future disasters. Such planning is required by FEMA to receive federal disaster mitigation funds.
Through multivariate analysis Victorville’s risks were quantified and ranked. Across 13 hazards, four were ranked as high. From greatest to least those risks are Earthquake/ Seismic, Flash Flood, Climate Change, Dam Inundation, Drought, Power Failure/ PSPS, Terrorism, Pandemic, Pipeline Rupture HAZMAT Release, Extreme Heat, High Winds/ Severe Storm, Aviation Accident, Fire/ Wildfire.
Victorville’s mitigation goals are as follows:
• Goal 1: Protect life, property, and reduce potential injuries from natural, technological, and human- caused hazards, including catastrophic threats posed by the DWR owned Cedar Springs Dam and the USACE owned Mohave Forks Dam which are high hazard dams and a major earthquake hazard. • Goal 2: Improve public understanding of and support for the need for hazard mitigation measures.
• Goal 3: Promote disaster resistance for Victorville’s natural, existing, and future built environment.
• Goal 4: Strengthen partnerships and collaboration to implement hazard mitigation activities.
• Goal 5: Enhance the City’s ability to effectively and immediately respond to disasters.
Describe the vulnerability of housing occupied by low- and moderate- income households to these risks.
Most of the respondents to the Resident Survey feel somewhat prepared for a disaster (Figure 25: Resident Survey.). Low- and moderate-income residents and special needs populations are especially vulnerable to the risks of c limate-related hazards. The residences of low - and moderate -income households are more often in worse condition and thus are more susceptible to external weather conditions such as extreme heat. Likewise, elderly residents are at a greater risk during extreme weather events such as extreme heat events.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 88
Figure 35: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 89
Strategic Plan
SP-05 OVERVIEW
The Strategic Plan is a guide for the City of Victorville to establish its housing, community and economic development priorities, strategies, and goals for the investment of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from HUD over the next five years, beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2026. The priority needs and goals established in this Strategic Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City’s 2022 Resident and Stakeholder Surveys, focus groups, and housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite) from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same period. Additional sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies involved in the development of affordable housing and the delivery of public services to low - and moderate -income people, persons with special needs and those at risk of homelessness.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Strategic Plan.
• Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Human services
• Housing programs
• Accessibility and mobility
• Economic Development
Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG and HOME programs to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG- and HOME -funded activities aligned with the following nine measurable Strategic Plan goals as elaborated in Section SP-45:
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 90
Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome
Indicator
1. Provide suitable
living
environments for
residents
- Affordable
Housing
Homeless
- Non-Homeless
Special Needs
- Non-Housing
Community
Development
- Supportive services
for the homeless and
those at risk of
homelessness
- Human services
Public service
activities for low/
moderate income
housing benefit:
17,490 people, 500
households, 135
structures
2. Decent and
affordable
housing for
consortia
residents
Affordable
Housing
Housing programs Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation: 300
household housing
units
3. Expand access to
essential services
and amenities
Non-housing
community
development
Accessibility and
mobility
Economic
Development
Public Facility of
Infrastructure other
than Low /
Moderate-Income
Housing Benefit:
500 people
Businesses – 10
business
Table 20 - Strategic Plan Summary
Historically, the City of Victorville has used CDBG funding to support activities that meet one of the aforementioned goals or similar goals established in the prior Consolidated Plan. Over the next five years, the City will continue to support public services through CDBG public service grants and other local funds that meet the goals of this Strategic Plan.
The City has established the following priority ranking system for housing and community development activities to be funded over the next five years:
• High Priority: Activities meeting a high priority Strategic Plan Goal are expected to be funded during the 2022-2026 period.
• Low Priority: Activities meeting a low priority Strategic Plan Goal may be considered for funding if sufficient funds are available after high priority activities are funded, up to but not exceeding the five -year goal outcome indicator set forth in this Strategic Plan.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 91
SP-10 GEOGRAPHIC PRIORITIES
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)
According to data from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates in HUD’s eCon Planning Suite for the Consolidated Plan, the City's household median income is $ 47,895. Evaluation of maps generated through HUD's Community Planning and Development mapp ing system (CPD Maps) reveals one Census Tract, the majority of which falls outside of the City limits, where the median income is less than 50 percent of AMI, it is above 50 percent of AMI in the remaining census tracts.
HUD allows CDBG grantees to implement certain activities such as initial construction or expansion of community facilities and infrastructure that benefit certain neighborhoods or villages (but not the entire City) provided the entire service area for the facility or infrastructure is pri marily residential and where at least 51 percent of residents are low- and moderate-income. In the majority of Census Tracts in Victorville over 51 percent of residents earn less than 80 percent of AMI. According to CPD maps, there are five Census tracts (98.00, 99.04, 99.05, 99.12, and 99.13) within Victorville City limits where over 49 percent of household incomes exceed 80 percent of AMI.
The Consortia will use a place-based strategy to distribute funding. It is the Consortia’s intent to fund construction activities in the areas most directly affected by the needs of low-income residents and those with other special needs. Where appropriate the Annual Action Plan will direct investment geographically to an area benefit neighborhood. The area benefit cate gory is the most used national objective for activities benefitting a residential neighborhood. An area benefit activity is one that benefits all residents, where at least 51 percent are low- and moderate-income. Public infrastructure improvements are an area benefit activity when they are in a predominantly low- and moderate-income neighborhood.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 92
SP-25 PRIORITY NEEDS
Priority Need Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low-;
Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly
Chronically homeless; Individuals; Families with Children; Mentally Ill; Chronic Substance Abuse; Veterans; Persons with HIV/AIDS, Victims of Domestic Violence; Unaccompanied Youth;
Geographic
Areas
Citywide
Associated
Goals
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Description The City of Victorville holds this as a high priority and will support CDBG public service activities which help prevent homelessness and support efforts for a structured path to stable housing for individuals and families who become homeless. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with
contributions from the private sector.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
According to the 2020 Point-In Time Count, there were 2,842 people living in homelessness, the majority (2,365) of whom were unsheltered. Across all focus group s the need for wrap around homeless services and facilities were identified as a high priority need. The homeless service providers and food bank focus group spoke directly to the expansive and complicated needs of those who are homeless and at risk of homelessness. Homeless services were identified by residents in the 2022 Consolidated Plan survey and in consultation with community stakeholders as both in high need and a high priority.
Priority Need Human services
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate,
Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly; Public Housing Residents
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 93
Elderly; Frail Elderly; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Persons with Physical Disabilities; Persons with Developmental Disabilities; Persons with Alcohol of Other Addictions; Persons with HIV/ AIDS and their Families; Victims of DV; Non -Housing Community Development
Geographic
Areas Citywide
Associated
Goals
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Description The City of Victorville holds this as a high priority and will support CDBG public service activities which help support individuals and families with individual and group development. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with
contributions from the private sector.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
The City of Victorville’s Strategic Plan for calls for a range of services for low - and moderate -income residents and those with special needs as a high priority. The top four highly needed and highest priority public services, excluding homeless services, according to the 2022 Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, are as follows: mental health, youth services, and services for abused and neglected children. The need for public services will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with contributions from the private sector. These results were echoed by participants in five focus groups: homeless services and food banks, education and youth services, public services, veterans, elderly and disabled services, and faith-based organizations.
Throughout San Bernardino County, including Victorville, maintaining mental health, and appropriate services for youth including abandoned and neglected children is a high priority. - Nearly 17 percent of San Bernardino Count y residents had mental illness in 2017, and only about eight percent received mental health services, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
- population, including ch ildren will have PTSD at some point in their lives. Applying those rates to the 121, 000 residents of the Victorville, approximately 7,303 suffer from PTSD.
- In Victorville children under the age of six are present in 4,890 households with incomes below 80 percent of AMI.
The National Center reports an estimated six percent of the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 94
Priority Need Housing programs
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate
Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly; Public Housing Residents
Elderly; Persons with Physical Disabilities; Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic
Areas Citywide
Associated
Goals Decent and affordable housing for consortia residents.
Description Preservation and creation of new affordable housing is necessary to meet the housing needs in Victorville and the Apple Valley - Victorville Consortium. Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low - and moderate- income households is a cost -effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units already affordable to low- and moderate-income households in the community. Create new housing affordable to extremely low -, low- and mo derate-income households through development of subsidized rental housing.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
There are tens of thousands of households in the Apple Valley - Victorville consortium that experience housing cost burden and need more affordable housi ng. Almost 39 percent of the Apple Valley-Victorville consortium households that earn less than 50 percent of AMI are renters who experience a severe cost burden, making these households the most at risk of homelessness.
Furthermore, for 16,115 households earning below 50 percent of AMI there are only 5,775 affordable units in the consortium. According to ACS and CHAS data, 19,649 households earning less than 80 percent of AMI are cost burdened— meaning those households pay more than 30 percent of income for housing costs and 10,980 households are severely cost burdened — meaning they pay more than 50 percent of income for housing costs.
As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. Low- and moderate -income homeowners , as well a s owners of multi-family properties, may not be financially positioned to properly maintain their investments. Homeowners and renters who have fixed incomes may struggle to keep up their homes and be unable afford an increase to their rent.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 95
The age and condition of Victorville’s housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Almost 79 percent of housing in the Apple Valley -Victorville consortium has been constructed since 1980. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air -conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures.
According to CHAS data showing the year housing units were built categorized by owner and renter tenure:
• Built 2000 or later 12,190 or about 37 percent of the 32,975 owner-occupied housing units;
• Built 1980 -1999 15,245 or 46 percent of the 32,975 -owner occupied housing units;
• Built 2000 or later 6,735 or approximately 29 percent of the 23,575 renter-occupied housing units; and
• Built 1980 -1999 10,475 or 50 percent of the 23,575 renter occupied housing units.
In the Apple Valley -Victorville consortium, of units constructed before 1980 occupied by households earning below 80 percent of AMI, about 46 percent (5,425 households) are renters and 20 percent (2,389 households) are owners.
Throughout the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium and in Victorville specifically residents and stakeholders expressed need for housing services and expanded/ improved types of housing through focus groups and surveys. Focus group participants voices the overall need for affordable housing and the specific needs for senior housing, rental rehab, and utility assistance. The surveys show a high need for the following housing services: rehab program
encompassing energy efficient improvements and general rehab as well as code enforcement. The surveys show affordable rental housing and senior housing are in the top three highest priority and most highly needed types of housing facilities
Priority Need Accessibility and mobility
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate
Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly
Elderly; Frail Elderly; Persons with Physical Disabilities
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 96
Table 21 – Priority Needs Summary
Narrative (Optional)
The City will incorporate the above goals along with specific needs identified through community engagement in considering funding applications f or each of its five Action Plans covered by the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
Pursuant to CDBG regulations, all projects must meet one of three national objectives set forth by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): (1) Benefit low- and moderate-income households, (2) Aid in the elimination/ prevention of slum and blight, or (3) Meet and urgent need (catastrophic events). Pursuant to HOME regulations, HOME funds are specifically focused on affordable housing activities and may be used to develop and support affordable rental housing and homeownership opportunities. Recommended project for funding should be Geographic
Areas
Citywide;
Associated
Goals
Expand access to essential services and amenities; Economic Development
Description Develop and support efforts to improve mobility in the community; identify and remove barriers that impede accessibility; support transit systems, mass and specialized, that enable residents to access destination for employment, edu cation, and other essential purposes; support collaborative efforts to improve community and regional transit.
Economic Development activities will include commercial rehabilitation, which includes exterior improvements and code compliance; micro-enterprise development to include training and technical assistance and other support services to increase the capacity of grantees to carry out microenterprise activities; water and sewer projects.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
Focus group participants voiced the need for improved mobility within the city and access to points beyond the city.
Based on the results of the Consolidated Plan Resident Survey and input from community workshops and consultations, the City of Victorville places a low priority on employment training and loans/ grants to small businesses owned and operated by low - and moderate-income residents as a pathway out of poverty. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with contributions from the private sector.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 97
consistent with addressing the needs identified, and priority strategies developed, in each five-year Consolidated Plan.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 98
SP-35 ANTICIPATED RESOURCES
Introduction
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2026, the City of Victorville anticipates investing an estimated $7,133,580 of CDBG funds to support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG is subject to federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD’s formulas . It is anticipated for the 2022-2023 Program Year the City will receive $1,447,740 in CDBG funds.
Program Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of Con
Plan
Narrative
Description Annual
Allocation
Program
Income
Prior Year
Resources Total
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public
Services
$1,447,740 TBD $272,115 $1,719,855 $5,790,960
Based on
2021-2022
FY
allocation
from HUD.
Table 22- Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
The City of Victorville is a HOME Consortium member with the Town of Apple Valley.
The Consortium is expected to receive HOME funding which can be lev eraged with CDBG funding if used for affordable housing. The City of Victorville will leverage HOME funding if future projects are presented during the next five years. The HOME program requires a 25 percent match based on fund expenditure. The HOME statute provides a reduction of the matching contribution requirement under three conditions: 1) Fiscal distress; 2) Severe fiscal distress, and 3) Presidentially declared major disasters covered under the Stafford Act. The Consortium has been identified by HUD as a severely fiscally distressed jurisdiction and has been granted a 100 percent match reduction for the fiscal year 2021 -2022. The Consortium expects this designation to occur in 2022-2023 as well.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 99
Depending on the financing structure of a given activity, it may be advantageous for the City to use CDBG funds to leverage appropriate state, local and private resources, including but not limited to those listed below.
Federal Resources
• American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
• Continuum of Care (CoC) Program
• HUD Veterans Affairs supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
• Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202)
• Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
• Youthbuild
• Federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
State Resources
• State Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
• Homekey
• Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • CalHome Program
• Multifamily Housing Program (MHP)
• Housing Related Parks Grant
• CalHFA Single and Multi-Family Program
• Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding
Local Resources
• San Bernardino County CoC
• Housing Authority of San Bernardino County (HASBC)
• Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA)
• City of Victorville General Fund
Private Resources
• Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program Community Reinvestment Act Programs United Way Funding Private Contributions
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 100
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Over the past year, City staff has been pursuing the development of a navigation center campus, called the “Wellness Center,” to be located at 16902 First Street, a City owned property, in accordance with City Council direction at the August 18, 2020, meeting to continue with the land use entitlement process and securing of funding for the project.
Discussion
Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG program, the City expects to spend approximately $ 7,238,700 of CDBG funds on housing, community development, public facilities, infrastructure and neighborhood services activities that promote a suitable living environment between July 20 22 and June 2026. It is anticipated that approximately $4.7 million of this will be spent on construction and housing projects and that $1 million will be spent on public services. Anticipated projects include:
• Housing rehab,
• Public Facilities Improvements (including fire suppression.), and • Public Services.
Assuming the continued funding level of the CDBG program, the City may allocate CDBG funds for economic opportunity activities to support the development and expansion of local small businesses during this next Consolidated Planning cycle through its Office of Economic Development with its microenterprise assistance program.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 101
SP-40 INSTITUTIONAL DELIVERY STRUCTURE
Table 24- Institutional Delivery Structure – provides an overview of the institutional structure through which the City of Victorville will carry out its Consolidated Plan including private industry, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions.
Responsible Entity Responsible Entity
Type
Role Geographic Area
Served
Victorville Government Economic
Development
Homelessness
Non-homeless
special needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
public services
Jurisdiction
Apple Valley Government Economic
Development
Homelessness
Non-homeless
special needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
public services
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
County Continuum
of Care
Continuum of care Homelessness
Planning
Other
Housing Authority of
the County of San
Bernardino County
PHA Homelessness
Public Housing
Rental
Region
Inland Fair Housing
and Mediation Board
Ownership
Rental
Region
Table 23- Institutional Delivery Structure
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 102
Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System The institutional delivery system in Victorville is high-functioning and collaborative— particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non- profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. The primary gap in the delivery system is inadequate resources to address all documented needs. As a result, even projects with a high priority may have to wait to be funded as listed institutions continue to seek additional funding sources.
Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services
Homelessness Prevention
Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted to
Homeless
Targeted to
People with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy X X X
Legal Assistance X X X
Mortgage Assistance X X X
Rental Assistance X X X
Utilities Assistance X X X
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement X X X
Mobile Clinics X X X
Other Street Outreach
Services X X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X X
Child Care X X X
Education X X X
Employment and
Employment Training X X X
Healthcare X X X
HIV/AIDS X X X
Life Skills X X X
Mental Health
Counseling X X X
Transportation X X X
Table 24 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 103
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)
The City of Victorville works jointly with the Town of Apple Valley as a consortium to provide housing to their jurisdictions. Together, they participate in the San Bernardino County’s Continuum of Care (COC), which provides funding and a network of resources for homeless abatement. The COC provides emergency shelter, supportive services, transitional and permanent housing. Victorville commits s taff to the COC planning and implementation process and provides the COC Steering Committee critical information regarding the types of resources and programs Victorville currently funds to assist the homeless.
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above.
The Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium has a long track record of successful partnerships among public and pri vate sector entities. The delivery system for the HUD grant program is no exception. Communication and cooperation is strong between the Consortium the San Bernardino County Homeless Coalition, including partner agencies, and the Housing Authority of the C ounty of San Bernardino . City staff continues to work closely with the other organizations to improve regulatory compliance, monitoring, cooperation and partnerships among agencies and technical capacity of organizations involved in project delivery.
The s ingle most significant gap in the service delivery system remains the lack of available funding to support local programs in Victorville and the Consortium for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness. In Victorville, this funding is limited to 15 percent of the annual allocation of CDBG funds. The City is not a direct recipient of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds; therefore, most of the HUD funding to address homelessness is available through the San Bernardino County Continuum of Care. State funding has been reduced with several years of fiscal challenges for the State of California and City funds for this purpose are limited. It has been difficult to accommodate increasing levels of need in the community and increases in the cost of providing services to homeless and special needs populations.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 104
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs.
To address the lack of resources necessary to fully address the needs of special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, the City continues to work with its nonprofit service providers to explore alternate funding sources and encourages the identification of alternate revenue streams.
The City of Victorville is undertaking several initiatives to address homelessness and housing instability. In December 2021, the City announced it was awarded a $28 million Homekey award from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the construction and operational support of its Wellness Center Campus. The campus is a critical component of the City’s strategy to reduce homelessness. Combining a low-barrier emergency shelter, recuperative care facility, medical clinic, interim housing, and wraparound support services. Construction is expected to begin in 2022.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 105
SP-45 GOALS SUMMARY
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Goal 1
Provide suitable
living
environments
for residents
2022 –
202620
27 Affordable
Housing
Homeless
Non-
Homeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide Supportive
services for
the homeless
and those at
risk of
homelessnes
s
Human
services
CDBG:
$4,731,534
Public
service
activities for
low/
moderate
income
housing
benefit:
17,490
people, 2,500
households,
135
structures
Description: Support the development of “one stop” resource centers to assist homeless persons to acquire the necessary documentation and consultation (mental and physical health, nutrition, job skills training, identification, social security and disability benefits, etc.) to achieve reentry into employment and housing; food and nutrition services; utility assistance; support for the Homeless Outreach Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) program; support public safety efforts; provide resource directories for all available services; and encourage collaboration between agencies, faith-based organizations and other stakeholder to unify services.
Goal 2
Decent and
affordable
housing for
consortia
residents
2022 –
2026
Affordable
Housing
Citywide Housing
programs
CDBG:
$987,656
Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation
: 100
household
housing
units
Description: Transitional shelters; affordable housing for multi-family, single family, veterans; rehabilitation owner-occupied and rental; down payment assistance; code enforcement activity to improve neighborhood aesthetics and values; reduce overcrowding in occupied properties; consider establishing rent control for affordability; encourage collaboration between public agencies, developers, investors and other stakeholder to develop a wide range of housing development.
Goal 3
Expand access
to essential
services and
amenities
2022 –
2026
Non-housing
community
development
Citywide Accessibility
and mobility
Economic
Development
CDBG:
$500,000
Public
Facility of
Infrastructur
e other than
Low /
Moderate-
Income
Housing
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 106
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Description: Develop and support efforts to improve mobility within the community and to points outside of the community, from expansion of paved sidewalks and streets to partnerships with public and privately-owned shared transportation services from buses to cars, to bikes and scooters.
Economic Development activities will include commercial rehabilitation, which includes exterior improvements and code compliance; micro -enterprise development to include training and technical assistance and other support services to increase the capacity of grantees to carry out microenterprise activities; water and sewer projects.
Benefit: 500
people
10 businesses
assisted
Goal 4
Administration
2022 -
2026
All Citywide All CDBG:
$1,447,74
0 N/A
Description: Provide for the timely and compliant administration of the CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs in accordance with HUD policy and federal regulations. HUD requires the City to represent Administration funds as a “goal” within the Strategic Plan so that the sources of funds (refer to Section SP-35) are fully allocated to goals.
Table 25 – Goals Summary
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
State law required jurisdictions to provide for their share of regional housing needs.
As part of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) determines the housing growth needs by income category for the cities within its jurisdiction, which include the City of Victorville. RHNA determination for the City of Victorville for the 2021-2029 period is to provide adequate sites for the construction of 8,165 new dwelling units. Of these new units, 1,735 should be affordable to very low-income, 1,136 should be affordable to low income, and 1,504 should be affordable to moderate-income households.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 107
SP-65 LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards.
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. This strategy requires the City to implement programs that protect children living in older housing from lead hazards.
Overall, the City has a relatively new housing stock . Therefore, lead -based paint hazards are not an extensive issue in Victorville. According to ACS data, about 79 percent Victorville’s housing stock was built after 1979, when the use of lead -based paint was outlawed, meaning that the residents of these homes should not be at risk of lead-based paint hazards. Only those units constructed prior to January 1, 1978, are presumed to have the potential to contain lead- based paint. In these units, the best way to have reasonable assurance that lead-based paint hazards are not present is to have the painted surfaces tested.
According to the City of Victorville Residential Rehabilitation Program, a typical lead- based paint screening survey costs approximately $5 00 to $1,000 . To reduce lead - based paint hazards, the City of Victorville takes the following actions:
• Include lead testing and abatement procedures, as required, in all residential rehabilitation activities falling under Strategic Plan Goal No. 2 for units built prior to January 1, 1978.
• Educate residents on the health hazards of lead-based paint through brochures and encourage screening children for elevated blood-lead levels. • Disseminate brochures about lead hazards through organizations such as the Inland Fair Housing Council and the City’s residential rehabilitation activities.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards?
Over time through testing and abatement, monitoring of public health data, and through public education, the public will have greater awareness of the hazards of lead-based paint to children. This will prompt homeowners, landlords, and parents of young children to proactively address unsafe housing conditions in pre -1978 units where children may potentially be exposed to lead-based paint hazards.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 108
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?
In accordance with federal regulation the Town of Apple Valley and the City of Victorville have established policies regarding the identification of lead -based paint (LBP) hazards. Housing build prior to 1978 must undergo lead- based paint testing prior receiving funding for rehabilitation. If deteriorated lead-based paint surfaces are found, they must be stabilized during the rehabilitation of the property. Abatement must be performed by a certified lead- based paint assessor prior to the issuance of the Notice of Completion. The Cons ortia will continue to maintain policies and procedures to increase assess to housing without LBP hazards. CDBG and HOME funding is not provided until it is determined properties are free of LBP hazards.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 109
SP-70 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY
Jurisdiction Goals, Prog rams and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families.
Poverty continues to be a significant challenge in Victorville and the Consortium .
According to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, there are 26,480 Victorville residents living below the poverty level. Of these residents, 9.479, over a quarter, are children under the age of 18.
To meaningfully address this challenge, each of the goals included in the 2022 -2026 Strategic Plan is aligned to support activities promoting the availability of affordable housing and provide essential services that directly benefit low - and moderate - income residents. In the implementation of the Strategic Plan, the City will prioritize funding for activities that most effectively address these goals over the next five years.
This strategy will emphasize using CDBG funds to help individuals and families rise out of poverty to long-term self-sufficiency.
The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in this Strategic Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty-level families by:
• Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness.
• Supporting expansion of housing affordable to low - and moderate -income households through development of new and preservation of existing housing. • Supporting public services for low - and moderate-income residents including the elderly, veterans, those with special needs and those at -risk of homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG funds; and • Support access to services, employment center, and amenities and mobility within the city and to surrounding areas.
• Promoting economic opportunity for low - and moderate -income residents through workforce training and small business assistance.
In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide a pathway out of pove rty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. In California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CalWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare, and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing,
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 110
nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence, and mental illness.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan?
Victorville’s Strategic Plan goals are aligned to benefit low - and moderate -income residents and to reduce the number of poverty-level families. For example, the goal of decent and affordable housing for families earning less than 30, 50 and 80 percent of AMI will preserve and provide additional affordable housing options for families transitioning from activities funded under the Homelessness Services goal. It will also include activities targeted to families who own their residence but lack the resources to address emergency repairs or maintain the property in compliance with City codes and standards. Addressing substandard or emergency housing conditions allows low- and moderate-income families to maintain housing stability while also guaranteeing that all economic segments of the community live in decent housing . The goal to provide suitable living environments will include funding for activities targeted to families in poverty and other low - and moderate -income households with specific service needs. Providing this range of targeted services allows children, families, seniors, and re sidents with special needs in Victorville appropriate support and resources to thrive.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 111
SP-80 MONITORING
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
To ensure CDBG funds are used efficiently and in compliance with applicable regulations, the City provides technical assistance to all subrecipients at the beginning of each program year and monitors subrecipients throughout the program year.
Technical Assistance
To enhance compliance with federal program regulations, the City provides an annual Notice of F unding Availability workshop to review the Annual Action Plan goals, program requirements and available resources with potential applicants. After the Action Plan is approved, a mandatory subrecipient workshop is held to review program regulations in detail, to provide useful forms and resources for documenting compliance and to review the City’s compliance procedures and requirements.
Additionally, individualized technical assistance is provided on an as -needed basis throughout a program year.
Activity Monitoring
All activities are monitored, beginning with a detailed review upon receipt of an application to determine eligibility, conformance with a National Objective and conformance with a Plan goal. This review also examines the proposed use of funds, eligibility of the service area, eligibility of the intended beneficiaries and likelihood of compliance with other federal requirements such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the System for Award Management (SAM) debarment list, prevailing wage, Minority and Women Business Enterprise, Section 3 and federal acquisition and relocation regulations, as applicable.
Subrecipients are required to submit an audit and other documentation to establish their capacity, and any findings noted in the audit are revie wed with the applicant.
Eligible applications are then considered for funding. Once funded, desk monitoring includes ongoing review of required quarterly performance reports. For CDBG public service activities, an on-site monitoring is conducted at least once every two years or yearly, or more frequently as needed to ensure compliance. These reviews include both a fiscal and programmatic review of the subrecipient’s activities. The reviews
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 112
determine if the subrecipient is complying with the program regulati ons and City contract. Areas routinely reviewed include overall administration, financial systems, appropriateness of program expenditures, program delivery, client eligibility determination and documentation, reporting systems, and achievement toward achieving contractual goals. Following the monitoring visit, a written report is provided delineating the results of the review and any findings of non- compliance and the required corrective action. Subrecipients normally have 30 days to provide the City with corrective actions taken to address any noted findings. Individualized technical assistance is provided, as noted above as soon as compliance concerns are identified.
For CDBG capital projects, monitoring also includes compliance with regulatory agreement requirements and may include annual monitoring to ensure renter occupied units’ household income, rent and utility allowance comply with applicable limits pursuant to the affordability covenant.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 113
2022-2023 Action Plan
AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2026, the City of Victorville anticipates investing an estimated $7.2 million of CDBG funds to support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG, is subject to federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD’s formulas for each respective program.
For the 2022-2023 Program Year, the City expects to receive approximately $1,447,740 of CDBG funds. When combined with available prior year resources, the 2022-2023 Action Plan allocates about $1,683,386 of CDBG funds to program activities that will be implemented from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023.
Program Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of Con
Plan
Narrative
Description Annual
Allocation
Program
Income
Prior Year
Resources Total
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public
Services
$1,447,740 TBD $272,115 $1,719,855 $5,790,960
Based on
2021-2022
FY
allocation
from HUD.
HOME Housing;
rehabilitation,
construction
$538,967 TBD $0.00 $538,967 $2,160,000
Based on
2021-2022
FY
allocation
from HUD
Table 26 - Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
The City does not require programs/ projects to provide matching funds. However, it is common for CDBG funded cons truction projects to include the use of non -federal funds.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 114
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
The City of Victorville is undertaking several initiatives to address homelessness and housing instability. In December 2021, the City announced it was awarded a $28 million Homekey award from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the construction and operational suppo rt of its Wellness Center Campus. The campus is a critical component of the City’s strategy to reduce homelessness. Combining a low-barrier emergency shelter, recuperative care facility, medical clinic, interim housing, and wraparound support services. Con struction is expected to begin in 2022.
Discussion
The City of Victorville shares overall responsibility for meeting the priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan with many other organizations. The City is responsible for using CPD entitlement funds to address the needs of low- and moderate-income residents. Other City departments and organizations provide services to low - and moderate-income residents by utilizing funding from federal, state, local and private resources.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 115
AP-20 ANNUAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals Summary Information
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geograp
hic Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Goal 1
Provide suitable
living
environments
for residents
2022 –
2023
Affordable
Housing
Homeless
Non-
Homeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide Supportive
services for
the homeless
and those at
risk of
homelessness
Human
services
CDBG:
$517,161
Public service
activities for
low/ moderate
income
housing
benefit: 500
people, 10
households,
1 structure
Description: Support the development of “one stop” resource centers to assist homeless persons to acquire the necessary documentation and consultation (mental and physical health, nutrition, job skills training, identification, social security and disability benefits, etc.) to achieve reentry into employment and housing; food and nutrition services; utility assistance; support for the Homeless Outreach Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) program; support public safety efforts; provide resource directories for all available services; and encourage collaboration between agencies, faith-based organizations and other stakeholder to unify services.
Goal 2
Decent and
affordable
housing for
consortia
residents
2022 –
2023
Affordable
Housing
Citywide Housing
programs
CDBG:
$491,031
Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation:
60 household
housing units
Description: Transitional shelters; affordable housing for multi-family, single family, veterans; rehabilitation owner-occupied and rental; down payment assistance; code enforcement activity to improve neighborhood aesthetics and values; reduce overcrowding in occupied properties; consider establishing rent control for affordability; encourage collaboration between public agencies, developers, investors and other stakeholder to develop a wide range of housing development.
Goal 3
Expand access
to essential
services and
amenities
2022 –
2023
Non-housing
community
development
Citywide Accessibility
and mobility
Economic
Development
CDBG:
$150,000
Public Facility
of
Infrastructure
other than Low
/ Moderate-
Income
Housing
Benefit: 10
people
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 116
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geograp
hic Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Description: Develop and support efforts to improve mobility within the community and to points outside of the community, from expansion of paved sidewalks and streets to partnerships with public and privately -owned shared transportation services from buses to cars, to bikes and scooters.
Economic Development activities will include commercial rehabilitation, which includes exterior improvements and code compliance; micro-enterprise development to include training and technical assistance and other support services to increase the capacity of grantees to carry out microenterprise activities; water and sewer projects.
Businesses: 10
business
Goal 4
Administration
2022
-
2023
All Citywide All CDBG:
$289,548
Description: Provide for the timely and compliant administration of the CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs in accordance with HUD policy and federal regulations. HUD requires the City to represent Administration funds as a “goal” within the Strategic Plan so that the sources of funds (refer to Section SP-35) are fully allocated to goals.
Table 27 – Goals Summary
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 117
AP-35 PROJECTS
Introduction
To address the high priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan, the City of Victorville will invest CDBG, funds in projects that preserve existing affordable housing, provide fair housing services, provide services to low - and moderate -income resident s including youth and seniors, provide services to residents with special needs, prevent homelessness and improve City public facilities. Together, these projects will address the needs of low- and moderate-income Victorville residents. 2022-2023 Projects
1. Operation School Bell
2. Improving the Education Outcomes of Victorville Foster Youth
3. Youth Drop in Center - Fam Spot
4. Behavioral Health Care
5. Homeless Shelter and Homeless Related Services
6. Fair Housing Services
7. MMK 21st Century Learning Education Enrichment Academies
8. Resources and Referrals for Families
9. Victims of Violence Program
10. Food and Disaster Relief Program for Disabled and Special Needs
11. Recreational/Educational/Arts Program for Special Needs
12. A Better Way
13. Fire Sprinkler System for Homeless Shelter
14. Route 66 Old Downtown Economic and Community Revitalization
15. Senior and Disabled Adult Home Repairs
16. Blight Abatement
17. Code Enforcement
18. Demolition
19. Residential Rehabilitation Program
22. Program Administration
Table 28 – Project Information
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 118
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non-administrative CDBG investments for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people throughout the City. The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate-income people include lack of funding from federal, state, and other local sources.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 119
AP-38 PROJECT SUMMARY
1 Project Name Operation School Bell
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $23,639
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
300 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Clothing for school aged children
2 Project Name Improving the Education Outcomes of Victorville Foster Youth Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $10,000
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
28 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Advocate representation for foster youth and wards of the state 3 Project Name Youth Drop in Center - Fam Spot
Target Area Citywide
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 120
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $11,820
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
50 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
After school youth program for 12- to 21-year-olds
4 Project Name Behavioral Health Care
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $19,699
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
110 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Provide behavioral health for foster youth and their foster families 5 Project Name Homeless Shelter and Homeless Related Services Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
Funding CDBG: $31,515
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 121
Description High Desert Homeless Services, Inc. assist homeless residents of the Victor Valley area and high desert by providing shelter and shelter related services, while they work towards regaining independence and a stable household. Services include but are not limited to shelter, meals, clothing hygiene items, telephone access, showers, and laundry facilities. Residents can attend life skill classes that include budgeting, parenting, computer classes, job search and resume writing. Childcare is provided to the residents while they attend the classes and search for job or permanent housing.
Additionally, the shelter provides showers including hygiene items to the homeless living on the streets. Showers are available on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.
Clothing is provided to those in need on Wednesdays and Thursdays from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
150 people will be assisted
Location
Description
14049 Amargosa Road, Victorville, CA 92392
Planned
Activities
Homeless shelter operations
6 Project Name Fair Housing Services
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $28,000
Description Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) will intake and process fair housing and landlord tenant complaints for Victorville residents. Victorville residents will receive fair housing and landlord - tenant information, education, and mediation to assist in resolving complaints. Complaints of housing discrimination will be analyzed and investigated to determine if fair housing violations have occurred. In addition, IFHMB will provide technical assistance including training in fair housing to City officials and staff to bring awareness of HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirements.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
180 people will be assisted
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 122
Location
Description
1500 S. Haven Ave., Ste. 100, Ontario, CA 91761
Planned
Activities
Fair Housing services and landlord/tenant mediation
7 Project Name MMK 21st Century Learning Education Enrichment Academies Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $10,000
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
100 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Free academies programs in science, technology engineering, arts and math
8 Project Name Resources and Referrals for Families
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $20,369
Description Moses House Ministries provides emergency and/or program intake resources and referrals to Victorville residents that are pregnant or low-income families with children under the age of five in need of resources.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
600 people will be assisted
Location
Description
15180 Anacapa Road, Victorville, CA 92392
Planned
Activities
Emergency resources and ongoing services to families with small children
9 Project Name Victims of Violence Program
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 123
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $15,760
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
1,400 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Provide crisis intervention, education and safety information for victims of sexual assault
10 Project Name Food and Disaster Relief Program for Disabled and Special Needs Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $10,895
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
180 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Provide food three times a week to families who provide proof of disability
11 Project Name Recreational/Educational/Arts Program for Special Needs Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $11,825
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 124
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
200 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Exercise, cooking and art classes for people with special needs 12 Project Name A Better Way
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $23,639
Description Victor Valley Domestic Violence will provide services to victims of domestic violence and their children. Services include emergency shelter, transitional housing, life skill classes, transportation, childcare and counseling.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
200 people will be assisted
Location
Description
14114 Hesperia, CA 92395
Planned
Activities
Support services for victims of domestic violence
13 Project Name Fire Sprinkler System for Homeless Shelter Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Expand access to essential services and amenities
Needs
Addressed
Accessibility and mobility
Funding CDBG: $300,000
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 125
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
100 people
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Installation of fire sprinklers in shelter's administration and dorm buildings
14 Project Name Route 66 Old Downtown Economic and Community Revitalization Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Expand access to essential services and amenities
Needs
Addressed
Funding CDBG: $150,000
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
10 businesses
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Funds will be used to increase business and job opportunity 15 Project Name Senior and Disabled Adult Home Repairs
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Decent and affordable housing for consortia residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $34,000
Description The program performs repairs of health and welfare issues for senior citizens and disabled residents.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
50 households
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 126
Planned
Activities
Minor home repair program to address health and safety issues 16 Project Name Blight Abatement
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $104,000
Description The Residential Compliance program is designed to assist income eligible property owners that have been cited to address existing Building or Sanitary code violations.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
20 structures
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
Planned
Activities
Abatement of illegal dumping, secure vacant structures
17 Project Name Code Enforcement
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $250,000
Description The program is designed to proactively implement municipal and State codes in order to maintain suitable living environments for the residents.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
100 households
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
Planned
Activities
Implementation of municipal and state housing codes
18 Project Name Demolition
Target Area Citywide
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 127
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $175,145.72
Description The Demolition and Abatement program removes dangerous structures and hazardous conditions along with abating illegally dumped trash and securing vacant/nuisance structures.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
7 structures
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
Planned
Activities
Demolition of unsafe structures
19 Project Name Residential Rehabilitation Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Decent and affordable housing for consortia residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $163,531; Any program income received during the 2022-2023 will be reallocated to the Residential Rehabilitation Program.
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
10 households
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
Planned
Activities
Rehabilitation of residential units to address health and safety issues and curb appeal
20 Project Name Administration
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Needs
Addressed
Funding CDBG: $289,548
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 128
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 129
AP-50 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed
The City of Victorville’s 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan did not identify specific areas of low-income and minority concentration. All CDBG funds will be directed toward activities benefitting low- and moderate-income residents citywide.
Target Area Percentage of Funds
Citywide 100%
Table 29 - Geographic Distribution
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Not applicable.
Discussion
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non-administrative CDBG investments for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate-income people citywide.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 130
AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS
Introduction
The City’s planned investment of CDBG, funds through the 2022-2023 Action Plan will address obstacles to fostering development of and maintaining existing affordable housing; evaluating and reducing lead-based paint hazards; reducing the number of families living in at or below the poverty line; developing institutional structure; and enhanced coordination among collaborative agencies and organizations.
Additionally, this section will identify obstacles to meeting underserved populations needs and propose action to overcome those obstacles.
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low - and moderate - income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, and the high cost of housing that is not affordable to low -income people. To address this obstacle, at least in part, the City is investing CDBG funds in local nonprofit organizations to address the public service needs of those who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or have incomes that are extremely low-, low-, or moderate.
The City will continue offering low -interest loans or emergency grants to low - and moderate-income Victorville homeowners using CDBG funds. The Residential Rehabilitation Program provides financing for home improvements necessary to ensure that residents can continue to live in quality housing that is already affordable to the occupants.
To address underserved needs, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non - administrative CDBG funds in Program Year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people or people presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate-income.
The City will invest over $200,000 in Program Year 2022-2023 in support of ten unique local nonprofit organizations providing services to low - and mode rate-income households.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing During the 202 2-2023 Program Year, the City will use CDBG funds to continue preserving and maintaining existing affordable housing through the Residential Rehabilitation and the Senior and Disabled Adult Home Repairs Programs . The City will continue to participate in the Apple Valley -Victorville HOM E Consortium, an effective way of providing more housing resources to residents. Specifically, the Consortium will support the City’s Senior Housing Repair Program with HOME funds in FY 2022-2023.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 131
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. To reduce lead -based paint hazards, the City of Victorville Residential Rehabilitation Program will conduct lead-based paint testing and risk assessments for each property assisted that was built prior to January 1, 1978, and will incorporate safe work practices or abatement into the scope of work as required to reduce lead -based paint hazards in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35.
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in the Consolidated Plan-Strategic Plan and this Action Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty-level families by:
• Supporting activities that increase the supply of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate-income households;
• Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness;
• Supporting housing prese rvation programs that ensure low -income households have a safe, decent and appropriate place to live; and • Supporting public services through various nonprofits funded by CDBG that serve the community’s youth, seniors, families, veterans and residents with special needs.
The City will invest CDBG and HOME funds during the 2022 -2023 Program Year to address high priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan including supportive services of the homeless and those at risk of homelessness, human services, and housing programs. The City will also invest CDBG funds to address individuals and families with special needs.
To address incidences of homelessness City will use CDBG to finance life and safety upgrades and shelter operations for High Desert Homeless Services , additionally Consortium HOME funds will finance the development of additional transitional housing beds through Hughes Training and Development . To address the needs of those with special needs the City will direct CDBG funds to Rockn’ Our Disabilities nutritional support and arts and wellness programming targeted toward those with disabilities. To address the housing needs of the elderly and those with disabilities the City and the HOME Consortium will fund housing rehab pro gram targeted to these populations.
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 132
The institutional delivery system in Victorville is best represented through the collaboration between local government and an outstanding set of nonprofit organizations that carry out a diverse array of human service programs to enrich the lives of residents. These relationships are collaborative—each organization partnering with the next to ensure that all Victorville residents have the support necessary to lead fulfilling lives. Affordable housing development and preservation activities will be carried out by the City in partnership with housing developers and contractors.
Guided by the Strategic Plan, public service activities will be carried out by nonprofit organizations and City d epartments to serve low - and moderate-income residents.
The City will collaborate across departments on city -owned public facilities improvements and will partner closely with nonprofit organizations receiving capital improvement funds to ensure their projects are delivered on time, within budget, and in compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations.
Through technical assistance and the annual Notice of Funding Availability process commencing each November, the City continues to develop and expand local institutional structure by strengthening existing partnerships and leveraging the experience of organizations that previously have not participated in locally administered federal programs to expand the number of program offerings available to residents. The City consistently funds a variety of high-quality services that address underserved needs in Victorville.
Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies
To enhance coordina tion between public and private housing and social service agencies, the City will welcome and encourage the participation of a wide variety of agencies and organizations that deliver housing and supportive services that add value to the lives of low- and moderate-income residents in Victorville.
Discussion
In the implementation of the 20 22-2023 Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG and HOME resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead-based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty-level families, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 133
AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
In the implementation of programs and activities under the 202 2-2023 Action Plan, the City of Victorville will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment, overall low- and moderate-income benefit for the CDBG program
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0
2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0
3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0
5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities 0
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00%
Discussion
In the implementation of programs and activities under the 20 22-2023 Action Plan, the City of Victorville will monitor all subrecipients for compliance with HUD regulations and provide technical assistance as nec essary to ensure successful implementation. During FY 2021-2022 eight activities did not spend their entire allocation making about $272,115 available to reallocate to eligible projects during FY 2022-2023.
Draft 2022 Analysis of
Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice
This page is intentionally left blank.
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Debra Jones
Mayor
Leslie Irving
Mayor Pro Tem
Elizabeth Becerra
Council Member
Blanca Gomez
Council Member
This page is intentionally left blank.
i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Fair Housing Issues ......................................................................................................................... 2 Apple Valley ............................................................................................................................... 2 Victorville ................................................................................................................................... 5 Demographic Summary .................................................................................................................. 8 Segregation/Integration ................................................................................................................. 16 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 16 Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty ............................................................... 26 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 26 Disparities in Access to Opportunity ............................................................................................ 28 Educational Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 28 Employment Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 32 Transportation Opportunities .................................................................................................... 42 Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities ....................................................................................... 49 Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities ........................................................... 53 Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity ...................................................................... 57 Disproportionate Housing Needs .................................................................................................. 58 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 58
1 Executive Summary
The Town of Apple Valley was incorporated in 1988 and consists of 78 square miles. According to the 2020 Census, the population of the Town is approximately 76,000 people. The City of Victorville was incorporated in 1962 and encompasses 74 square miles. According to the 2020 Census, approximately 135,000 people live in the City. Since 1997, both cities have received an annual allocations of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
In 2003, the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville formed the HOME Investment Partnership Program Consortium (the “HOME Consortium”) in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME entitlement status with HUD. Both the City and the Town receive CDBG and HOME funding annually. For the purpose of this Assessment to Fair Housing (AFH), the Town of Apple Valley and the City of Victorville may be collectively referenced as “Communities” and “Jurisdictions”.
As Entitlement Jurisdictions, both the City and Town are required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) to assist the Communities in identifying fair housing issues, contributing factors, and goals in order to affirmatively further fair housing. Below is a summary of the fair housing issues, significant contributing factors, and fair housing goals. Also included is an overview of the process and analysis used to identify the fair housing issues and to reach the goals.
To conduct the Analysis of Impediments for Apple Valley and Victorville, the Jurisdictions gathered and analyzed data for each jurisdiction and the region. The region is defined as the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area, which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County. The data utilized are from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS), HUD’s AFFH Data and Mapping Tool, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, and stakeholder surveys conducted as part of the Con Plan process. The data are generally from the most recent available years, with the exception of the ACS data, which are from the 2013-2017 estimates in order to align with the data utilized in the Con Plan.
Analyzed data topics include:
• Demographic
• Housing
• Segregation/ Integration
• Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty • Disparities in Access to Opportunity
2 Fair Housing Issues
Apple Valley
Overview
According to the data analysis summarized in this document, Apple Valley residents in general have relatively low access to high performing schools and employment opportunities, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, Black and Hispanic residents (especially those living below the poverty line), residents of Mexican origin, and families with children, are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high performing schools, high labor force participation, and high levels of human capital. These groups are also more likely to live in neighborhoods where they are exposed to poverty.
These challenges are all present in Census tract 0097.16, which is in the center of the jurisdiction and is defined by HUD as a racially or ethnically concentrated area of poverty (R/ECAP). Per HUD, R/ECAPs are Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria: a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower. Census tract 0097.16 has relatively low performing schools, low levels of labor force participation and human capital, and high levels of poverty. The analysis shows that Black residents, families with children, and residents born in Mexico disproportionately reside in this area.
Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is the primary organization providing fair housing assistance and support within the region. As summarized in Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021 below, the most common fair housing case documented by both Apple Valley and Victorville is related to disability. The second most common issue is race and the third is sex.
Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected
Class, 2011-2021
Protected Class Cases in Apple
Valley
Cases in
Victorville
Age 6 8
Ancestry
Arbitrary 3 11
Color 3
Disability 168 314
Familial Status 4 14
Marital Status 1
National Origin 3 10
Race 21 80
Religion 2 1
3 Sex 22 25
Sexual
Orientation 1 2
Source of Income 4 16
Grand Total 235 484
Source: Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board
Segregation
• Compared to the region and Victorville, Apple Valley has relatively few Hispanic, Limited English Proficiency, and Foreign-Born residents, and compared to Victorville, Apple Valley also has relatively few Black residents (see Table 2 – Demographics and Table 3 – Demographic Trends).
• Mexican-born residents are the only foreign-born population group present in the Census tracts in the center of the jurisdiction, including in the R/ECAP (Census tract 0097.16).
Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse Community Factors:
• R/ECAPs:
o Census tract 0097.16, in the center of the jurisdiction, is classified as a R/ECAP (see Map 1). Black residents of Apple Valley disproportionately reside in the R/ECAP: while Black residents only make up 7.7% of the jurisdiction’s total population, 15.33% of the R/ECAP population is Black. Additionally, families with children and residents born in Mexico also disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. (See Table 2 – Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics) • Access to high-performing schools:
o Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are least likely of any racial/ethnic group to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
o Among foreign-born residents, those born in Mexico appear to be least likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (see Map 7). This is related to the fact that residents born in Mexico disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs (See Table 2 – Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics). o Families with children appear less likely to live in neighborhoods with high- performing schools than families without children (see Map 7). This is related to the fact that families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs (See Table 2 – Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics). • Employment opportunities:
o Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
o In the areas with the best access to employment centers and the highest levels of labor force participation and human capital, there are relatively few residents of
4 Mexican origin compared to other National Origin groups, or families with children compared to other types of families, indicating that these groups have less access to neighborhoods with employment opportunities (see Map 8 and Map 9).
• Access to transportation:
o Native Americans living below the poverty line experience the least access to public transit and the highest transportation costs of any group (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
• Exposure to poverty:
o While all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods, the following groups are most likely to live in neighborhoods with relatively high exposure to poverty (this is related to the fact that these groups disproportionately reside in the R/ECAP area):
Hispanic and Black residents (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
Mexican-born residents and families with children (see Map 12).
Housing Issues
• According to Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, the majority of fair housing complaints received in the jurisdiction are related to residents with a disability seeking reasonable accommodations (see Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021).
• Over half of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of their income to pay for housing-related costs. The percentage of all renters who are cost burdened is decreasing, however the number of cost-burdened renters is increasing (see Table 4 – Housing Trends).
• Native American, Hispanic, and Black households are significantly less likely than White, Non-Hispanic or Asian/Pacific Islander households to own their own homes (see Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity).
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns:
• A small but increasing proportion of the population has limited English proficiency. The main language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” is Spanish (see Table 2 – Demographics, Table 3 – Demographic Trends, and Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home).
• The population is aging. The proportion of the population that is over age 65 is increasing (see Table 3 – Demographic Trends).
• According to the Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index, while racial/ethnic segregation in Apple Valley remains low, it has been increasing since 1990, especially between White and Black residents (see Table 5 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends).
5 Victorville
Overview
According to the data analysis, all Victorville residents, regardless of protected class status, have relatively low access to high-performing schools, relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, there is evidence that different protected class groups face specific challenges regarding access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors. For example:
• Native Americans, particularly those living below the poverty line, appear to be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville. According to ACS data, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate and the highest unemployment rate of any group.
• Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs, which may be related to the fact that more residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas. • Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), which HUD defines as Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria:
a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
Segregation
• Mexican-born residents appear to be the predominant foreign-born group in the city’s central neighborhoods, while there appear to be higher concentrations of Asian-born residents in the southeastern Census tracts.
Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse Community Factors • R/ECAPs:
o Census tracts 0098 and 0099.05, along the eastern edge of the jurisdiction, are classified as R/ECAPs, as are Census tracts 0091.17 and 0091.16, which are partially within northern Victorville (see Map 1). Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs (see Table 2 - Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics). • Employment opportunities:
o Native Americans, and particularly those living below the poverty line, may be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville: Native Americans have the lowest Labor Market Index value of any group, and Native Americans below
6 the poverty line have the lowest Jobs Proximity Index value of any group (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
• Access to transportation:
o Asian and Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs than other groups (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity). This disparity may be related to the fact that, as shown on Map 10 and Map 11, a larger number of residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas (see Map 10 and Map 11).
• Exposure to poverty:
o While all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods, Asian and Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the highest exposure to poverty (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
Housing Issues
• According to Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, the majority of fair housing complaints received in the jurisdiction are related to residents with a disability seeking reasonable accommodations (see Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021).
• Over half of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of their income to pay for housing-related costs. The percentage of all renters who are cost burdened is decreasing, however the number of cost-burdened renters is increasing (see Table 4 – Housing Trends).
• Black households are significantly less likely than other households to own their own homes. Hispanic and Native American households are also less likely than White, Non- Hispanic or Asian/Pacific Islander households to be homeowners (see Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity).
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns:
• An increasing proportion of the population has limited English proficiency. The main language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” is Spanish (see Table 2 – Demographic, Table 3 – Demographic Trends, and Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home).
Fair Housing Goals
Many of the fair housing issues summarized above are largely driven by private market forces over which the Community Development programs have limited control. However, both Apple
7 Valley and Victorville are firmly committed to promoting access to fair housing and affirmatively furthering fair housing through all of their programs and activities.
To promote fair housing, the following goals have been established for Apple Valley and Victorville.
Goal Program Marketing
Description Both jurisdictions shall ensure that all HUD-funded programs are marketed in high poverty areas within their jurisdiction in manners that will be accessible to residents to ensure that low-income residents and high poverty neighborhoods have best access to all program activities.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall maintain documentation showing that it marketed programs in areas of high poverty and conducted such marketing in a way that clearly communicated the program to the residents in those areas.
Goal Target Non-Housing Activities in Areas of High Poverty Description Both jurisdictions shall use CDBG funds to carry out non-housing activities (such as public works, public services, and economic development) in areas of high poverty. This may include carrying out activities citywide, but promoting services in those areas or electing to target activities in these areas.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall report in the CAPER how its activities promoted anti-poverty goals and objectives.
Goal Monitor and Apply for Federal and State Funding to Increase Community Development and Housing Activities
Description Both jurisdictions shall actively monitor new funding opportunities for additional community development and affordable housing activities. Unless there is specific justification not to apply, the jurisdictions shall apply for these funding streams.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall maintain a log of new Federal and State funding streams that are available to promote affordable housing and community development.
Goal Promote Fair Housing Education for Tenants and Homebuyers Description Both jurisdictions shall fund and promote fair housing training for tenants, homebuyers and potential homebuyers to ensure that residents are fully informed of their rights as it relates to housing.
Evaluation Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Goal Promote Fair Housing Education for Landlords and Realtors
8 Description Both jurisdictions shall fund and promote fair housing training for landlords and realtors to ensure that they understand the fair housing requirements and rights of tenants and homebuyers. .
Evaluation Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Goal Maintain Fair Housing Resources on Website
Description In collaboration with the fair housing provider for the jurisdiction, maintain a page on the jurisdiction website that provides access to fair housing resources and documents. Further, collaborate with the fair housing provider to promote trainings and other fair housing related events.
Evaluation Review and update webpage resources annually with support from fair housing provider and maintain documentation of promoting all trainings and events carried out by the fair housing provider in the jurisdiction.
Goal Maintain Housing and Community Development Resources List
Description Establish and maintain a list of all housing and community development resources that is updated annually. This list may include services such as grant or loan programs for reasonable modifications and access to programs such as Meals on Wheels.
Evaluation Review and update list on an annual basis.
Demographic Summary
Describe demographic patterns in the jurisdiction and region and describe trends over time (since 1990).
Table 2 – Demographics, shows demographic information for the populations of Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. The region is defined as the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area, which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County.
Table 3 – Demographic Trends, shows similar data over time, going back to 1990.
Race/Ethnicity:
Apple Valley: As shown in Table 2, Apple Valley is a majority White, non-Hispanic jurisdiction. Just over half of Apple Valley’s population is White, non-Hispanic, approximately 35% are Hispanic, 7.7% are Black, and 3% are Asian or Pacific Islander. Over the past 30 years, Apple Valley has become less White. This trend has been driven by the growth of the Hispanic population, shown in Table 3.
9 Victorville: Victorville is a majority-minority city. Fifty-five percent of the population is Hispanic, 15% is Black, almost 4% is Asian or Pacific Islander, and 22% is White, Non- Hispanic. Over the past 30 years, Victorville’s population has increased due primarily to the growth of the Hispanic and Black populations. In 1990, the city was two-thirds White, Non- Hispanic. Since then, the White population has declined while the Black population more than quadrupled and the Hispanic population grew six-fold.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region: Apple Valley is a majority White, Non- Hispanic jurisdiction in a majority-minority region. Apple Valley has a much smaller percentage of Hispanic residents than either Victorville or the region. Victorville’s population, which is 55% Hispanic, looks more like the region, however, Victorville has a higher percentage of Black residents than either the region or Apple Valley. Both Apple Valley and Victorville have a smaller proportion of Asian or Pacific Islander residents than the region. Over the past 30 years, all three geographies have experienced population growth driven in part by increasing numbers of Hispanic residents. In Victorville and the region, the White, Non-Hispanic population also declined over this period, while in Apple Valley, the number of White, Non-Hispanic residents increased. As a result of these trends, Victorville and the region became majority Hispanic.
Apple Valley, in comparison, continues to be majority White, Non-Hispanic.
National Origin
Apple Valley: As shown in Table 2, the main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Apple Valley is Mexico. Residents born in Mexico comprise 3.34% of the population.
Residents from El Salvador and the Philippines each represent approximately 0.87% of the population of Apple Valley. Over the past 30 years, the foreign-born population in Apple Valley has grown from 5.55% of the population to over 9%.
Victorville: As shown in Table 2, the main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Victorville is Mexico, followed by El Salvador and the Philippines. Just over 10% of the population was born in Mexico. Over the past 30 years, the foreign-born population in Victorville has grown from about 10% of the population to nearly 18%.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region: The main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region is Mexico. El Salvador and the Philippines are the second and third most common nations of origin for the foreign-born population in all three areas. In all three geographies, the proportion of the population that is foreign-born has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3. Table 2 and Table 3 also show that Apple Valley has had, and continues to have, a relatively small proportion of foreign-born residents when compared to both Victorville and the region. In the most current year shown in Table 3 (2017), 9.29% of Apple Valley residents were born outside the U.S., compared to 17.74% of Victorville residents and 21.37% of the regional population.
Limited English Proficiency
Apple Valley:
10 As shown in Table 2, the most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Apple Valley is Spanish.1 Over 3% of Apple Valley’s population has limited English proficiency (LEP) and uses Spanish as their primary language at home. The proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3.
Victorville:
The most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Victorville is Spanish. Over 10% of Victorville’s population has limited English proficiency (LEP) and uses Spanish as their primary language at home. The proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table
3. Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
As shown in Table 2, the most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Apple Valley, Victorville. and the region is Spanish. Apple Valley has a smaller proportion of residents that have limited English proficiency (LEP) and use Spanish as their primary language at home, compared to Victorville and the region. In all three geographies, the proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 also shows that Apple Valley has a smaller proportion of LEP residents than either Victorville or the region, and Victorville has a slightly smaller proportion of LEP residents than the region. For the most current year shown in Table 3 (2017), 4.91% of Apple Valley residents, 12.22% of Victorville residents, and 15% of the region’s residents had limited English proficiency.
Disability
Apple Valley:
As shown in Table 2, the most common types of disabilities in Apple Valley are ambulatory difficulties (8.72% of the population has an ambulatory difficulty), followed by independent living difficulties (6.17% of the population) and cognitive difficulties (5.34% of the population).
Victorville:
The most common types of disabilities in Victorville are ambulatory difficulties (5.56% of the population has an ambulatory difficulty), followed by independent living difficulties (4.37% of the population) and cognitive difficulties (4.36% of the population).
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
The most significant disability types in all three geographies are the same: ambulatory, independent living, and cognitive difficulties. However, Apple Valley has higher rates of individuals living with disabilities than either Victorville or the region. Table 1 – Housing
1 The ACS does not provide 5-year estimates for all languages spoken by the population that speaks English “less than very well” after the 2011-2015 dataset. Instead, for later years, data is provided for those who speak Spanish, Other Indo-European languages, Asian and Pacific Islander languages, and Other languages. There are 1-year estimates through 2019 that provide more specificity regarding languages spoken, but these estimates are not available for Apple Valley. For this reason, Table 2 uses the AFFH data provided by HUD, which is from the 2011- 2015 ACS, with the exception of data for Spanish speakers, which is taken from the 2013-2017 ACS table S1601.
11 Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021, below, shows housing discrimination cases by protected class for the ten-year period between 2011-2021. These data, provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, show the large majority of fair housing complaints received in each jurisdiction are related to residents living with a disability.
Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected
Class, 2011-2021
Protected Class Cases in Apple
Valley
Cases in
Victorville
Age 6 8
Ancestry
Arbitrary 3 11
Color 3
Disability 168 314
Familial Status 4 14
Marital Status 1
National Origin 3 10
Race 21 80
Religion 2 1
Sex 22 25
Sexual
Orientation 1 2
Source of Income 4 16
Grand Total 235 484
Source: Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board
Age
Apple Valley:
As shown in Table 2, 26.35% of Apple Valley’s population is younger than 18, 56.48% are between 18-64 years old, and 17.16% are 65 years or older.
Victorville:
As shown in Table 2, 32.39% of Victorville’s population is younger than 18, 58.59% are between 18-64 years old, and 9.02% are 65 years or older.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
As shown in Table 2, compared to Apple Valley and the region, Victorville has a relatively young population: Victorville has a smaller proportion of residents over the age of 65 years and a larger proportion of residents under the age of 18. Compared to the region, Apple Valley has a relatively old population. This is reflected in the data on the median age of residents: according to ACS data, the median age in Apple Valley is 37.2 years, the median age in the region is 34 years, and the median age in Victorville is 29.6. Over the past 30 years, the populations in both Apple Valley and the region have been getting older, while the population in Victorville has been getting younger. Table 3 shows that the percentage of the population that is under 18 has been
12 declining in Apple Valley and the region, and increasing in Victorville, while the opposite is true for the population aged 65 years and older in all three places.
Family Type
Apple Valley:
As shown in Table 2, in Apple Valley, the percentage of all family households that have children under the age of 18 living with them is 41.07%.
Victorville:
As shown in Table 2, in Victorville, the percentage of all family households that have children under the age of 18 living with them is 52.05%.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
As shown in Table 2, Victorville has a higher proportion of families with children than the region, and the region has a higher proportion of families with children than Apple Valley. In all three geographies, the proportion of families that have children is lower than it was in 1990, as shown in Table 3.
13 Describe housing patterns in the jurisdiction and region, including tenure, cost burden, and the location of renters and owners.
Tenure
Table 4 – Housing Trends, below, shows data on housing tenure and cost burden for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. These data are from the 2008-2012 and 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, the number of housing units increased by about 1,000 units, from 22,975 to 23,911, due entirely to an increase in rental housing units. The number and share of owner- occupied housing units declined over this period, however, the majority of housing remains owner-occupied (64.81% of units were owner-occupied in 2017).
Victorville:
In Victorville, the number of housing units increased by about 1,500 units, from 31,186 to 32,629, due entirely to an increase in rental housing units. The number and share of owner- occupied housing units declined over this period. While the majority of housing remains owner- occupied (53.54% of units were owner-occupied in 2017), if these trends continue, rental housing will soon comprise the majority of housing in the city.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In all three geographies, the total number of housing units is increasing, and most of the housing remains owner-occupied. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, however, the number and share of owner-occupied housing decreased in all three places. Victorville has a higher share of rental housing units compared to Apple Valley and the region. Of all three places, Apple Valley has the highest homeownership rate.
Cost Burden
Apple Valley:
As of 2017, over half of renters (53.03%) in Apple Valley were cost-burdened, meaning they used more than 30% of their monthly income to pay for housing-related costs. Among
14 homeowners, slightly less than 1/3 were cost-burdened. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, the number and percentage of homeowners who were cost-burdened declined. Over the same period, the number of cost-burdened renters increased slightly, however the percentage of all renters who are cost-burdened declined, due to the larger increase in the total number of renters.
Victorville:
As of 2017, over half of renters (57.16%) in Victorville were cost-burdened. Among homeowners, about 1/3 were cost-burdened. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, the number and percentage of homeowners who were cost-burdened declined. Over the same period, the number of cost-burdened renters increased, however the percentage of all renters who are cost-burdened declined, due to the larger increase in the total number of renters.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In all three geographies, over half of all renters in were cost-burdened in 2017. Victorville had the highest rate of cost-burden among renters, followed by the region. Apple Valley renters were the least likely to be cost-burdened. In all three geographies, about 1/3 of homeowners were cost- burdened in 2017. Over the five-year period between 2012-2017, trends were similar across all three geographies: the number and percentage of cost-burdened homeowners decreased, perhaps reflecting the recovery from the Great Recession; and the percentage of renters who were cost- burdened decreased, however, the number of cost-burdened renter households increased.
Map 16 – Housing Tenure includes two maps showing the distribution of renter households in Apple Valley/Victorville and the region. The darker shaded areas have a higher proportion of renter households. The map of Apple Valley/Victorville shows a high concentration of renter households in two Census tracts in Apple Valley: 0097.16 in the center of the jurisdiction and 0097.10 in the southeast part of the jurisdiction. In Victorville, the Census tracts in the southeast part of the city have high concentrations of renters, as does the portion of Census tract 0091.16 that is inside Victorville’s northwest boundary. In the region, there are concentrations of renters in the southwest, as well as in Census tracts in the central and northern part of the region.
15 16
Segregation/Integration
Analysis
Describe and compare segregation levels in the jurisdiction and region.
Identify the racial/ethnic groups that experience the highest levels of segregation. Explain how these segregation levels have changed over time (since 1990).
Table 5 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends shows how segregated or integrated various racial/ethnic groups are in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region using a Dissimilarity Index, which is calculated using data from the 2010 Decennial Census. The Dissimilarity Index measures the degree to which two groups are evenly distributed across a geographic area and is commonly used for assessing residential segregation between two groups. Dissimilarity index values between 0 and 39 generally indicate high integration (low segregation), values between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation, and values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation.
Apple Valley:
As Table 5 shows, Apple Valley has relatively high levels of integration among White and Black, White and Hispanic, and White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents. Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents are the most integrated according to this metric, while Black and White residents are the least integrated. While integration is relatively high, over the past 30 years, Apple Valley has become more segregated, with segregation levels between Black and White residents increasing the most of any group.
Victorville:
Table 5 shows Victorville has relatively high levels of integration among the various race/ethnic groups. In Victorville, Hispanic and White residents are the most integrated and Black and White residents are the least integrated, according to this metric. Similar to Apple Valley, over the past 30 years, segregation levels have increased slightly overall. Segregation between Hispanic and White residents and between Asian or Pacific Islander and White residents increased, while segregation between Black and White residents decreased.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Apple Valley and Victorville, compared to the region, are more integrated than the surrounding jurisdictions and county. The Dissimilarity Index values show moderate levels of segregation between race/ethnic groups in the region, with Black and White residents experiencing the highest degree of segregation. Over the last few decades, as all three geographies have become less White and more Hispanic (as shown in Table 5), they have also become more segregated overall.
17 Identify areas with relatively high segregation and integration by race/ethnicity, national origin, or LEP group, and indicate the predominant groups living in each area. Discuss how patterns of segregation have changed over time (since 1990).
Map 1 – Race/Ethnicity shows the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region—each dot represents 75 people, and the various racial/ethnic groups are represented by different colored dots. Map 2 – Race/Ethnicity Trends shows the same distribution at three different points in the past: 1990, 2000, and 2010. In these maps there are no apparent concentrations or separation of colored dots within Apple Valley or Victorville, indicating that residents of different racial/ethnic groups within each jurisdiction experience high levels of residential integration and have for the past few decades. However, the maps do clearly show the higher numbers of Hispanic and Black residents (represented by blue and green dots, respectively) in Victorville compared to Apple Valley, as well as the increase in Hispanic residents in Victorville over the past 30 years.
In the region, by comparison, Map 1 shows some areas of racial/ethnic concentration that align with the dissimilarity indices showing higher levels of segregation in the region than in Apple Valley or Victorville. While the maps are somewhat hard to read at this scale, there are areas on Map 1 where orange dots (representing White, Non-Hispanic residents) are clustered with few people of other racial/ethnic groups present. Map 2 shows the changing demographics over time, with an increasing number of Hispanic residents, represented by blue dots on the map, concentrated in certain parts of the region.
18 19
20 21
Map 3 – National Origin shows the distribution of foreign-born residents in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. On the maps, each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored
22 dots represent different countries of birth, for the 5 most populous groups of foreign-born residents. In Apple Valley, Mexican-born residents are present throughout the jurisdiction, however, in the Census tracts in the center of the jurisdiction they are the only foreign-born population group present. In Victorville, Mexican-born residents and residents born in the various Asian countries listed on the map are present throughout the city. However, Mexican- born residents appear to be the predominant foreign-born group in the city’s central neighborhoods, while there appear to be higher concentrations of Asian-born residents in the southeastern Census tracts. In the region, there are concentrations of residents born in Mexico in certain areas, as indicated by the dense concentrations of orange dots.
23 According to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (ACS), shown in Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home, below, 19.4% of Apple Valley residents over the age of 5 speak a language other than English at home, including 5.9% that speak English less than “very well”. Of those who speak English less than “very well”, the largest group is of those that speak Spanish: 4.5% of Apple Valley’s population has limited English proficiency and speaks Spanish at home.
In Victorville, 38.4% of residents over the age of 5 speak a language other than English at home, including 13.9% that speak English less than “very well”. Of those who speak English less than “very well”, the largest group is of those that speak Spanish: 11.6% of Victorville’s population has limited English proficiency and speaks Spanish at home.
24 Map 4 - LEP shows the distribution of residents in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region with Limited English Proficiency. On the maps, each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored dots represent languages spoken by individuals who speak English “less than very well,” for the 5 most common languages spoken by residents with limited English proficiency (LEP). In Apple Valley and Victorville, Spanish speakers appear to be distributed throughout the jurisdictions, while Tagalog speakers appear to live in Census tracts on the western edge of each jurisdiction. In the region, Spanish speakers seem to be concentrated in certain areas as shown by the groupings of orange dots.
25 Consider and describe the location of owner and renter occupied housing in determining whether such housing is located in segregated or integrated areas.
The analysis above shows that Apple Valley and Victorville residents of various race/ethnicity, national origin, and LEP groups generally experience relatively high levels of residential integration across the jurisdiction. The only noticeable exception in Apple Valley is Census tract 0097.16, in the center of the jurisdiction, where the only foreign-born residents are those who were born in Mexico.
Discuss whether there are any demographic trends, policies, or practices that could lead to higher segregation in the jurisdiction in the future.
According to the above analysis, Apple Valley and Victorville have become more diverse over the past few decades and there is reason to believe this trend will continue. Over the same period, segregation in Apple Valley has increased and may continue to do so as the jurisdiction diversifies further. In Victorville, segregation between Hispanic and White, and between Asian or Pacific Islander and White residents, has also increased over this period. These trends may continue if the city’s demographics continue to change. Both Apple Valley and Victorville actively evaluate policies to limit policies that may directly or inadvertently result in segregation within the jurisdictions.
26 Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of
Poverty
Analysis
Identify any R/ECAPs or groupings of R/ECAP tracts within the jurisdiction.
HUD defines racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) as Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria:
• a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and
• a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
As shown in Map 1, below, in Apple Valley, Census tract 0097.16, in the center of the jurisdiction, is classified as a R/ECAP—this is shown by the pink outline. In Victorville, Census tracts 0098 and 0099.05, along the eastern edge of the jurisdiction, are classified as R/ECAPs.
Additionally, Census tracts 0091.17 and 0091.16, which are partially within northern Victorville, are also classified as R/ECAPs.
Which protected classes disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs compared to the jurisdiction and region?
27 Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics, includes details on the race/ethn icity, family type, and national origin of residents living in R/ECAPs in Apple Valley , Victorville, and the region.
By comparing the demographic data in Table 2 - Demographics (on page 12) to Table 7, below, we can identify which protected class groups disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs— generally speaking, if the percentage of a particular class living in R/ECAPs is higher than the percentage of the total population they represent, we can say they disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. For example, in Apple Valley, Black residents only make up 7.7% of the jurisdiction’s total population, yet 15.33% of the R/ECAP population is Black. This indicates that Black residents of Apple Valley disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. Additionally, in Apple Valley, families with children and residents born in Mexico also disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. In Victorville, Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. In the region, Black and H ispanic residents, Mexican -born residents, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs.
Describe how R/ECAPs have changed over time (since 1990).
According to Map 2 (on pages 19 -21), which shows demographics in Apple Valley , Victorville, and the region at three different points in time (1990, 2000, and 2010), there were no R/ECAPs in Apple Valley or Victorville in 1990, but in 2000, tract 0098 in Victorville was classified as a R/ECAP . According to Map 1 (on page 26) , in 2010, tract 0098 in
28 Victorville was still a R/ECAP and three more tracts in the city were classified as R/ECAPs.
In Apple Valley, Census tract 0097.16 was classified as a R/ECAP in 2010.2 Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Educational Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to proficient schools based on race/ethnicity, national origin, and family status.
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a School Proficiency Index, which measures the proximity various racial/ethnic groups have, based on where they live, to neighborhoods with high-performing schools. School proficiency is measured using school-level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams. The index is based on a range of 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better proximity to high-performing schools.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, there is some disparity in access to high-performing schools by race/ethnicity.
Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (with an index value of 43.44), followed by White residents (41.45), Native American residents (38.99), and Hispanic residents (37.35). Black residents are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools, with an index value of 36.35. In general, index values for all residents are relatively low, indicating access to high-performing schools is a problem for the entire jurisdiction. For the population living below the poverty line, access to high-performing schools is even more limited. Except for Native American residents living below the poverty line, who have the highest index value of any group, all other race/ethnic groups living below the poverty line have less access to high-performing schools. Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the least access, with index values of 29.28 and 29.56, respectively.
Victorville:
In Victorville, there are small disparities in access to high-performing schools by race/ethnicity.
White, Non-Hispanic residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (with an index value of 20.95), followed by Asian/Pacific Islander residents (20.07), Hispanic residents (19.4), Black residents (19.33), and Native American residents (16.47), who have the least access. The population below the poverty line has similar levels of access to high- performing schools, though Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the best access of any group (23.63).
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
2 The 2010 version of Map 2 does not show any R/ECAPs in Apple Valley. The discrepancy between R/ECAPs shown on Map 2 and Map 1 is due to the fact that HUD uses different sources of data for these maps. More information about the data used for these maps can be found online at https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/FHEO/documents/AFFH-T-Data-Documentation-AFFHT0006-July-2020.pdf
29 In the region, there are much wider disparities in the school proficiency index across racial/ethnic groups and for the population below the poverty line. Black and Hispanic residents below the poverty line have the lowest index values (25.68 and 26.74, respectively), meaning they are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools. White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents above the poverty line have the highest index values (46.63 and
51.51, respectively) meaning they are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools.
Compared to the region, Apple Valley’s White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly worse access to high-performing schools, while Apple Valley’s Black, Hispanic, and Native American residents have slightly better access. This also means that there is slightly less disparity in access based on race/ethnicity in Apple Valley, as compared to the region
In Victorville, in comparison both Apple Valley and the region, residents have less access to high-performing schools: However, in Victorville, there are fewer disparities by race/ethnicity as compared to the region and Apple Valley.
30 Describe the relationship between the residency patterns of racial/ethnic, national origin, and family status groups and their proximity to proficient schools.
Map 7 – Demographics and School Proficiency is a series of three maps showing the School Proficiency Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type.
The maps are shaded according to school proximity index values. The darker shaded areas are those with higher index values, indicating the presence of higher performing schools in those areas.
Apple Valley:
There are differences in school performance based on geography, with neighborhoods in the southwest of the jurisdiction having the highest performing schools, and the more central neighborhoods having the least access to high-performing schools.
The first map shows that residents of different racial/ethnic groups, represented by different colored dots, seem to be evenly distributed across Apple Valley, with no visible concentrations in areas with better or worse access to high-performing schools. The second map shows that the areas with least access to high-performing schools, which are in the center of the jurisdiction, are home to residents originally from Mexico. The other national origin groups reside in areas with better access to high-performing schools. This indicates that residents born in Mexico may have less access to high-performing schools than other groups.
The third map shows where families with children live in relation to areas with high-performing schools. The size of the circles on the map indicates the percentage of families in the area that have children living with them. The map shows that the areas with the least access to high- performing schools (in the R/ECAP in the center of the jurisdiction) also have the highest proportion of families with children (shown by the relatively large circles).
Victorville:
In Victorville, there are also differences in school performance based on geography. Census tracts in the southeast have darker shading than the rest of the city, indicating higher performing schools.
The first two maps show that residents of different racial/ethnic groups and different national origins, represented by different colored dots, do not seem to be concentrated in areas with better or worse access to high-performing schools. Similarly, the third map shows that larger circles, indicating higher proportions of families with children, do not seem to be clustered in areas with either higher or lower performing schools. All this indicates that Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities, national origins, and family types have similar levels of access to high- performing schools.
31 32
Describe how school-related policies, such as school enrollment policies, affect a student’s ability to attend a proficient school. Which protected class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools? Both Apple Valley and Victorville school districts strive to create and promote proficient schools across their districts. The school districts
From the above analysis, it appears that, in Apple Valley, Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line, as well as residents born in Mexico and families with children are more likely than other residents to live in areas with lower-performing schools, indicating that these protected class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools. In Victorville, compared to Apple Valley and the region, all residents, regardless of race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type, have relatively low access to high-performing schools.
Employment Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to jobs and labor markets by protected class groups.
Jobs Proximity
33 Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Jobs Proximity Index, which measures the physical distance between where Apple Valley and Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities live and the location of jobs. A higher index value indicates better access to employment opportunities.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, access to employment opportunities is relatively low for all groups, and those living below the poverty line have less access to employment centers. There is some disparity in access to employment centers by race/ethnicity, with Asian/Pacific most likely to live near employment centers (index value of 26.91) and Hispanic residents least likely to live near employment centers (index value of 19.57).
Victorville:
In Victorville, access to employment opportunities varies slightly by race/ethnicity. Native American residents have the best access to employment centers (with an index value of 50.68) and Asian/Pacific Islanders have the least access (index value of 34.16). For all race/ethnic groups except Native Americans, populations living below the poverty line has better access to employment centers.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In both Victorville and the region, residents of all races/ethnicities, including those living below the poverty line (except for Native Americans living below the poverty line in Victorville), have better access to employment centers than residents of Apple Valley. In the region, there are also disparities in access to employment centers based on race/ethnicity. Black residents living below the poverty line have the least access to employment centers (with an index value of 41.83) and Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the greatest access (with an index value of 57.38).
Labor Market
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Labor Market Index, which measures the unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor’s degree, by neighborhood. A higher index value indicates that residents live in a neighborhood with higher labor force participation and human capital.
Apple Valley:
Table 8 shows that Apple Valley residents generally live in neighborhoods with low labor force participation and human capital, as indicated by the relatively low index values for all race/ethnic groups. Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital: they have index values of just 8.26 and 8.66, respectively. Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital: they have an index value of 19.83, which is still relatively low.
Victorville:
34 Table 8 shows that Victorville residents generally live in neighborhoods with low labor force participation and human capital, as indicated by the relatively low index values for all race/ethnic groups. Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital (with an index value of 14.63) and Native American residents are least likely to (index value of 8.94). Except for Native Americans, populations living below the poverty line are even less likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
The population of Victorville, in comparison to Apple Valley and the region, has relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital. Apple Valley residents lag the region’s residents on this index: overall the region’s residents have better access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital than both Victorville and Apple Valley. In the region, there are significant disparities in access based on race/ethnicity.
Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the least access of any group to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital (with index values of
16.85) and Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the most access (with an index value of 57.38).
How does a person’s place of residence affect their ability to obtain a job?
Map 8 – Demographics and Job Proximity is a series of three maps showing the Jobs Proximity Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are closer to areas of employment.
Apple Valley:
The maps show the northern part of Apple Valley has better proximity to jobs centers, meaning residents that live in those areas are closer to employment opportunities. Because Apple Valley is well integrated by race/ethnicity, there does not appear to be any major difference in proximity to job opportunities by race/ethnicity on the first map. However, on the second and third maps show, in the areas with the best access to employment centers there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin and families with children.
Victorville:
The maps show Census tracts in the southeast and northwest of Victorville have some of the highest jobs proximity index values, meaning residents that live in those areas are closer to employment opportunities. Because Victorville is relatively well integrated by race/ethnicity, there does not appear to be any major difference in proximity to job opportunities by race/ethnicity on the first map. Similarly, the second and third maps show that residents of different national origins and families with children are also fairly well distributed across the areas with better access to jobs.
35 36
Map 9 – Demographics and Labor Market is a series of three maps showing the Labor Market Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they have higher labor force participation and human capital.
Apple Valley:
The maps show that the northern part of Apple Valley and a Census tract on the western edge have the highest levels of labor force participation and human capital, relative to other parts of the jurisdiction. Similar to Map 8, there does not appear to be any concentration of specific race/ethnic groups in areas with higher or lower index values, however there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin and families with children in the areas with the highest levels of labor force participation and human capital.
Victorville:
The maps show that all parts of Victorville have relatively low labor market index values—there is no dark shading on the map. Certain areas of the city do have slightly higher index values, including the sparsely populated northernmost Census tract, and two Census tracts in the southwest. Similar to Map 8, there do not appear to be any concentrations of protected class groups in specific areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation and human capital.
37 38
Which racial/ethnic, national origin, or family status groups are least successful in accessing employment?
Table 9 – Labor Force Participation and Unemployment, below, shows 2013-2017 American Community Survey data on labor force participation rates and unemployment rates for the overall population and by race/ethnicity, disability status, and sex, in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. The graph below, titled COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Unemployment Rate, shows the monthly unemployment rate for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region in 2020 and 2021, demonstrating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on employment.
Apple Valley:
According to Table 9, in Apple Valley, Hispanic residents have the highest labor force participation rate (60.8%) and Black residents have the lowest (39.3%). There are also wide disparities in the unemployment rate. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest unemployment rate (8.17%), while Hispanic and Native American residents have significantly higher unemployment rates (15.2% and 19.9%, respectively). Persons living with a disability are less likely to participate in the labor force and are more likely to be unemployed than the population as a whole. Finally, women in Apple Valley are more likely to be unemployed than men.
According to Table 8, Black and Hispanic residents in Apple Valley who are living below the poverty line are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and
39 human capital. Additionally, Map 8 and Map 9 show that Apple Valley residents born in Mexico and families with children are less likely to live in areas with good access to job centers, high labor force participation, and high levels of human capital.
Victorville:
According to Table 9, in Victorville, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate (31.7%) and the highest unemployment rate of any group (25.8%). Among other race/ethnic groups, labor force participation is nearly the same, however there are large disparities in the unemployment rates. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest unemployment rate (7.41%), followed by White residents (11.4%), Hispanic residents (15.3%), and Black residents (15.9%). Persons living with a disability are less likely to participate in the labor force and are more likely to be unemployed than the population as a whole.
According to Table 8, Native Americans have the lowest Labor Market Index value of any group, and Native Americans below the poverty line have the lowest Jobs Proximity Index value of any group. This indicates that Native Americans, and particularly those living below the poverty line, may be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville.
As shown in the graph below, during the economic shutdown initiated in response to COVID-19, unemployment in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region increased dramatically. Victorville, in comparison to Apple Valley and the region, started off with a higher unemployment rate, reached a higher peak level of unemployment (17% in April 2020), and has maintained a higher unemployment level since then. While the unemployment rate in the region reached a higher level in April 2020 than the unemployment rate in Apple Valley (peaking at 15.2% in the region compared to 13.4% in Apple Valley), employment in the region has recovered at a faster rate than in Apple Valley. Since October 2020 the region has maintained a lower unemployment rate than Apple Valley.
40 It is very likely the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated racial/ethnic and gender-based unemployment disparities in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. While data at a local level is not yet available, national trends show wide disparities in job losses by race/ethnicity and sex.
According to the Congressional Research Service,3 across the U.S., women at every age group experienced higher increases in unemployment during the pandemic than men. The same was true for Black and Hispanic workers in comparison to White and Asian workers. The charts below show the disparities in peak unemployment rates during the pandemic by age/sex, race, and ethnicity.
3 Falk, G., Romero, P., Nicchitta, I., & Nyhof, E. (2021, August 20). Unemployment Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved December 4, 2021 , from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R46554
41 42
Transportation Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to transportation based on place of residence, cost, or other transportation related factors.
Access to Public Transit
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Transit Index, which measures the likelihood that residents utilize public transportation. Higher index values indicate better access to public transit in a neighborhood. Map 10 – Demographics and Transit Trips is a series of three maps showing the Transit Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with better access to public transit.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, Apple Valley residents of different races/ethnicities have comparable access to public transit. Index values range from a low of 30.24 for Asian/Pacific Islanders to a high of
36.48 for Black residents. For the population below the poverty line, access to public transit is generally better, with higher index values for all groups except for Native Americans living below the poverty line, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 18.01.
As Map 10 shows, residents in the R/ECAP Census tract in the center of the jurisdiction have the best access to public transit in Apple Valley. As described previously, Apple Valley residents experience a relatively high level of residential integration across races/ethnicities, therefore Map 10 shows that there is no significant concentration of specific racial/ethnic groups in neighborhoods with greater or lesser access to public transit. However, of all national origin groups, only residents of Mexican origin live in the R/ECAP area, indicating they have better access to public transit than other national origin groups. Similarly, the R/ECAP area has a high concentration of families with children (shown by the relatively large dots on the third map), indicating those families with children have relatively good access to transit.
43 Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities have comparable access to public transit. Index values range from a low of 27.12 for Asian/Pacific Islanders to a high of
29.92 for Black residents. For the population below the poverty line, access to public transit is generally better, with higher index values for all groups except for Black residents living below the poverty line.
As Map 10 shows, Census tracts in the center of the city and in the north have the best access to public transit in Victorville (shown by the darker shading). As the first map shows, residents of different races/ethnicities are evenly distributed across the city, therefore there are no visible disparities in access to public transit by race/ethnicity. On the second map, however, which shows the distribution of residents of various national origins, there appear to be relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, or Korean origin, compared to those of Mexican origin, in the Census tracts with the most access to public transit. This indicates that Victorville residents born in these Asian countries may be less able to access public transit than other groups. Finally, the third map, which shows the distribution of families with children, does not appear to show any concentration of families with children in areas with high or low access to public transit.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents in Apple Valley generally have better access to public transit compared to their counterparts in Victorville. In the region, all racial/ethnic groups have better access to public transit compared to both Apple Valley and Victorville. In the region, Native Americans have the least access, with an index value of 47.70, and Asian/Pacific Islanders have the greatest access, with in index value of 55.92. Access to public transit is generally even higher for the population living below the poverty line, with Asian/Pacific Islanders living below the poverty having the highest index value (58.72).
44 45
Transportation Costs
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Low Transportation Cost Index, which measures the cost of transportation in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate lower transportation costs. Transportation costs may be low in a neighborhood due to better access to public transportation, or to the density of housing, services, and employment, or to other reasons. Map 11 – Demographics and Low Transportation Cost is a series of three maps showing the Low Transportation Cost Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with lower transportation costs.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, transportation costs are comparable for all racial/ethnic groups in Apple Valley. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the highest costs, with an index value of 38, and Black residents have the lowest costs, with an index value of 40. For residents living below the poverty line, transportation costs are generally lower, with higher index values for all groups except Native Americans, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 34.19.
Map 11 shows that residents in the R/ECAP Census tract in the center of the jurisdiction have lower transportation costs than residents in other areas. The even distribution of colored dots on the first map indicates that there is no concentration of specific racial/ethnic groups in neighborhoods with higher or lower transportation costs. The second map shows that, of the various national origin groups in Apple Valley, only residents born in Mexico live in the
46 R/ECAP area. The third map shows that there is a high concentration of families with children in the R/ECAP (shown by the relatively large dot sizes in that area). These maps indicate that residents born in Mexico and families with children benefit from living in an area with lower transportation costs.
Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, transportation costs are comparable for all racial/ethnic groups in Victorville.
Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the highest costs, with an index value of 35.92, and Native American residents have the lowest costs, with an index value of 39.06. For residents living below the poverty line, transportation costs are generally lower, with higher index values for all groups except Native Americans, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 29.21.
Map 11 shows that residents living in the Census tracts in the center of the city—the area with the darkest shading—have the lowest transportation costs. Similar to Map 10, there does not appear to be a concentration of particular race/ethnic groups, or families with children, in areas with higher or lower transportation costs. However, the Census tracts shaded the darkest do appear to be areas with relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin, indicating those groups may face higher transportation costs relative to others.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents in Apple Valley and Victorville have very similar levels of access to neighborhoods with low transportation costs. In the region, index values are slightly higher for all groups compared to Apple Valley and Victorville, indicating lower transportation costs overall for residents in the region. There are no large disparities by race/ethnicity. The lowest index value is
42.13 (for White, Non-Hispanic residents) and the highest index value is 46.31 (for Hispanic residents). For the population below the poverty line, index values are higher for all racial/ethnic groups. Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the highest index value (49.70) and White, Non-Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the lowest index value (45.70).
47 48
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by the lack of a reliable, affordable transportation connection between their place of residence and opportunities?
In general, different race/ethnic groups in Apple Valley have similar levels of access to public transportation and experience similar transportation costs. The exception is Native Americans living below the poverty line, who experience the least access to public transit and the highest transportation costs of any group. Residents of Mexican origin and families with children who live in the R/ECAP area in the center of the jurisdiction appear to have relatively good access to public transit and relatively low transportation costs.
Similarly, in Victorville, different race/ethnic groups have broadly similar levels of access to public transportation and experience similar transportation costs. However, Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs. This disparity may be related to the fact that, as shown on Map 10 and Map 11, a larger number of residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas.
Describe how the jurisdictions’ and region’s policies, such as public transportation routes or transportation systems designed for use personal vehicles, affect the ability of protected class groups to access transportation.
49 The Victor Valley Transit Authority (VVTA) establishes and maintains bus routes throughout the high desert communities. VVTA maintains routes that serve all communities within the region and evaluates its routes to ensure they are the most effective routes to serve the high desert communities. VVTA complements its regular bus route with programs such as its van pool program to offer subsidies to van pools for commuters traveling together.
Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities
Describe any disparities in exposure to poverty by protected class groups.
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Low Poverty Index, which measures the level of poverty in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty (with an index value of 42.92), followed by White residents (39.3). Hispanic and Black residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with index values of 31.95 and 32.29, respectively. Residents living below the poverty line generally have higher exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. The exception is Native American residents living below the poverty line, who are slightly less likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than the overall Native American population in Apple Valley.
Victorville:
In Victorville, all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty (with an index value of 24.31), followed by White residents (23.43). Hispanic, Black, and Native American residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with index values of 21.57, 21.16, and 20.78, respectively. Residents living below the poverty line generally have higher exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. In fact, Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the highest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 15.92. The exception is Native American residents living below the poverty line, who are the least likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods of any group.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Victorville residents are more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than Apple Valley residents. Disparities in which race/ethnic groups are more likely to be exposed to poverty are similar in both places. Regionwide, residents are generally less likely to live in neighborhoods where they are exposed to poverty than either Apple Valley or Victorville, however the disparities in index values by race/ethnicity are larger. In the region, Hispanic residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 36.39. Asia/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 58.83. The population living below the poverty line in the region is even more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods, with index values significantly lower than the overall population.
50 Index values for the population below the poverty line range from 24.29 for Hispanic residents to
41.94 for Asian/Pacific Islander residents.
What role does a person’s place of residence play in their exposure to poverty?
Map 12 – Demographics and Poverty is a series of three maps showing the Low Poverty Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to poverty.
Apple Valley:
Map 12 shows that residents in neighborhoods in the northern and southeastern parts of Apple Valley have less exposure to poverty, and residents in the R/ECAP area in the center of the jurisdiction have the highest exposure to poverty. While racial/ethnic groups seem to be relatively evenly distributed across areas with both higher and lower exposure to poverty, the second and third maps show that there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin or families with children in the darkest shaded areas in the north compared to the R/ECAP area. This indicates that Mexican-born residents and families with children are more likely than other groups to be exposed to poverty in the neighborhoods where they live.
Victorville:
In Victorville, Map 12 shows that residents in the Census tracts in the central and eastern part of the city (including the two R/ECAPs) and in the R/ECAP in the northwest, are the most likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods. Given the even distribution of race/ethnic groups and families with children across the jurisdiction, there is no apparent concentration of specific race/ethnic groups or of families with children in those areas with more or less exposure to poverty. The second map in the series, which shows where residents of different national origins live, does show that there are relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, or Korean origin in those Census tracts with the highest exposure to poverty, compared to other parts of the city. This indicates that those populations are less likely to be exposed to poverty than other national origin groups.
51 52
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by these poverty indicators?
Table 10 – Poverty by Race/Ethnicity and National Origin, below, shows data from the 2013- 2017 American Community Survey on poverty rates by race/ethnicity and national origin.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, according to the above analysis, Black and Hispanic residents are more likely to live in neighborhoods with relatively high exposure to poverty, as are residents of Mexican origin and families with children. According to Table 10, Native American residents have the highest poverty rate (31.49%), followed by Hispanic residents (24.2%), Black residents (24.07%), White residents (13.86%), and Asian/Pacific Islander residents, who have the lowest poverty rate (6.31%). Foreign-born residents of Apple Valley are less likely than native-born resident to live below the poverty line, with a poverty rate of 14.53% compared to 18.49% for native-born residents.
Victorville:
In Victorville, the above analysis indicates that all residents have a relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, the analysis also indicates that Asian/Pacific Islander residents have a slightly lower risk of exposure to poverty. According to Table 10, Black residents have the highest poverty rate (32.56%), followed by Native American residents (29.58%), Hispanic residents (25.42%), Asian/Pacific Islander residents (14.43%), and White
53 residents, who have the lowest poverty rate (14.3%). Foreign-born residents of Victorville are slightly more likely than native-born resident to live below the poverty line.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Apple Valley has a slightly higher poverty rate overall (18.12%) than the region (16.82%), and Victorville has a highest rate (23.26%) of all three. In the region, there are similar disparities in poverty to Apple Valley and Victorville, with Native American, Black, and Hispanic residents more likely to live below the poverty line than Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents. In the region, like in Victorville, foreign-born residents are more likely to live below the poverty line than native-born residents.
Describe how the jurisdictions’ and region’s policies affect the ability of protected class groups to access low poverty areas.
Apple Valley:
The Town of Apple Valley relies upon the availability of Housing Choice Vouchers provided through the Housing Authority. Unfortunately, the waitlist for Apple Valley is rarely open. Further, federal funding for other housing programs is limited compared to private, market pressures on housing in the Town.
Victorville:
Access to lower poverty areas is limited to residents in Victorville because of the limited opportunities in labor, transportation and education. Further, housing has become less affordable over the past ten years – putting greater poverty pressure on hous eholds throughout the City.
Victorville is limited in providing access to low poverty areas via limited Housing Choice Vouchers and limited other funding for affordable housing and tenant based rental assistance programs.
Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by protected class groups.
54 Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes an Environmental Health Index, which captures the potential exposure to harmful toxins in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to harmful toxins, and therefore better environmental quality, in a neighborhood. Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental Health is a series of three maps showing the Environmental Health Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to harmful toxins and therefore higher environmental quality.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, Apple Valley residents of all racial/ethnic groups, including those living below the poverty line, have relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
Index values for all groups in Apple Valley are in the mid-70s.
As Map 13 shows, areas in southeast Apple Valley have the highest index values, while areas in the north and northwest of the jurisdiction have the lowest index values (meaning residents in the north/northwest have less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods than those in the southeast). The maps also show that residents of different race/ethnic groups and national origins, and families with children, are evenly dispersed throughout the areas with better and worse access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, meaning there are no apparent disparities based on those protected classes.
Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, Victorville residents of all racial/ethnic groups have relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Index values for all groups in Victorville are in the high 60s. The population below the poverty line generally has slightly less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods than the population as a whole: index values are in the mid 60s.
Map 13 shows that there is relatively uniform access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods across Victorville—most of the city has the same shading. The exceptions are one Census tract in the northwest, which has the high index value (i.e., is more environmentally healthy relative to other tracts), and two Census tracts in the center of the city—including one of the R/ECAPs— that have lower index values than other areas, meaning residents in those areas have less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. The maps do not show any concentration of race/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or families with children in the areas with better or worse access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents of all races/ethnicities in both Apple Valley and Victorville experience relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, though Apple Valley residents have slightly better access than their counterparts in Victorville. In comparison, the population in the region has much less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, and access varies significantly by race/ethnicity. Asian/Pacific Islander residents of the region have the least access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, with an index value of 35.12. Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line are slightly worse off, with an index value of 34.87, the lowest of any population group in the region. Native American and White residents in the region
55 have the most access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods of any group, with index values of 49.9 and 48.02, respectively, though they still have less access than residents of Apple Valley and Victorville.
56 57
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups have the least access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods?
The Environmental Health Index in Table 8 and Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental Health show that there is no significant disparity in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by race/ethnicity, national origin, or family status.
Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Identify and discuss any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and exposure to adverse community factors based on race/ethnicity, national origin, or familial status. Identify areas that experience an aggregate of poor access to opportunity and high exposure to adverse factors. Include how these patterns compare to patterns of segregation and R/ECAPs.
Apple Valley:
According to the above analysis, Apple Valley residents in general have relatively low access to high performing schools and employment opportunities, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, the analysis indicates that Black and Hispanic residents (especially those living below the poverty line), residents of Mexican origin, and families with children, are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high performing schools, high labor force participation, and high levels of human capital. These groups are also more likely to live in neighborhoods where they are exposed to poverty.
These same challenges are all present in Census tract 0097.16, which is the R/ECAP tract located in the center of the jurisdiction. This part of the jurisdiction has relatively low performing schools, low levels of labor force participation and human capital, and high levels of poverty.
The analysis shows that Black residents, families with children, and residents born in Mexico disproportionately reside in this R/ECAP.
Victorville:
According to the above analysis, all Victorville residents, regardless of protected class status, have relatively low access to high-performing schools, relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, there is evidence that different protected class groups face specific challenges regarding access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors.
For example:
• Native Americans, particularly those living below the poverty line, appear to be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville. According to ACS data, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate and the highest unemployment rate of any group.
• Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs, which may be related to the fact that more residents of
58 Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas. • Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs.
Disproportionate Housing Needs
Analysis
Which groups experience higher rates of housing cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing when compared to other groups? Which groups also experience higher rates of severe housing burdens when compared to other groups?
For the 2022 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), the Apple Valley-Victorville HOME Consortium analyzed 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data to determine if racial/ethnic groups at various income levels disproportionately experience any of the following four housing problems:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
• Overcrowding: A household is considered overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room.
• Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
According to the analysis in the ConPlan, at least one racial/ethnic group is disproportionately impacted by one or more of four housing problems in all income levels. Disproportionate impact means that a particular group is more likely to experience housing problems when compared to the population as a whole. As the chart below shows, among households in Apple Valley and Victorville that earn up to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Black, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic households are more likely than other households to experience at least one of the four housing problems listed above. Eighty-three percent (83%) of Black households, 100% of Pacific Islander households, and 77% of Hispanic households experience at least one housing problem.
In comparison, 63% of White households and 69% of Asian households experience at least one housing problem.
59 Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013- 2017 5- Year Estimates
The 2022 ConPlan also analyzes the disproportionate impact of severe housing problems by race/ethnicity. Similar to housing problems, severe housing problems are defined as:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven and refrigerator. • Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running water or modern toilets.
• Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
• Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
The chart below shows that, among Apple Valley and Victorville households that earn up to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Hispanic households are more likely than others to experience at least one of the four severe housing problems listed above. Forty-six percent (46%) of Hispanic households experience at least one severe housing problem. In comparison, 31% of White households, 25% of Black households, 34% of Asian households, and 0% of Pacific Islander households experience at least one severe housing problem.
60 Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013- 2017 5- Year Estimates
Which areas in the jurisdiction and region experience the greatest housing burdens? Which of these areas align with segregated areas, integrated areas, or R/ECAPs and what are the predominant race/ethnicity or national origin groups in such areas?
Map 6 – Housing Problems is a series of maps showing concentrations of households experiencing one or more housing burdens and population distribution by race/ethnicity and national origin, for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. On these maps, areas with darker shading have a higher percentage of households experiencing at least one housing burden.
Housing burdens in this context are the following: cost burden, defined as paying more than 30% of income for monthly housing costs including utilities; overcrowding; lacking a complete kitchen; and lacking plumbing.
Apple Valley:
The maps show that the northern and southeastern parts of Apple Valley have higher concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens, compared to other neighborhoods. Census tract 0097.10, in the southeast, has the highest concentration of households with housing burdens. In that area, 56.48% of households have at least one of the four housing burdens.
These maps also show there is no apparent concentration of specific racial/ethnic or national origin groups in the areas with high or low concentrations of housing burdens.
Victorville:
Map 6 shows that the southeastern part of Victorville has a higher concentration of families experiencing housing burdens than most other areas of the city. In these areas, which include two R/ECAPs, over 50% of families experience at least one housing burden. Census tract 0091.16, portions of which are in northwest Victorville, over 60% of families experience at least one housing burden. This Census tract is classified as a R/ECAP. The maps do not show any
61 concentrations of specific race/ethnic or national origin groups in the areas with more housing burdens.
Region:
In the region, there are high concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens to the near west of Apple Valley/Victorville, as well as farther to the northwest and south. Based on the scale of these maps, it is difficult to determine whether there are specific racial/ethnic or national origin groups concentrated in the areas with more housing burdens.
62 63
64 Describe the differences in rates of renter and owner-occupied housing by race/ethnicity in the jurisdiction and region.
Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity, below, shows the percentages of households that are renters and homeowners by race/ethnicity, for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, 65% of all households own their home, however there are significant disparities by race/ethnicity. The homeownership rate for Asian/Pacific Islander residents in Apple Valley is highest, at 80%. White households have a comparable homeownership rate of 71%. However, only 54% of Native Americans and Hispanic households own their home. For Black households, the homeownership rate is even lower, at 49%.
Victorville:
In Victorville, 54% of all households own their home and there are significant disparities by race/ethnicity. The homeownership rate for Asian/Pacific Islander residents in Apple Valley is highest, at 73%. White, Non-Hispanic households have the second highest homeownership rate, at 62%. Hispanic and Native American households have significantly lower homeownership rates, of 55% and 58%, respectively. Black households have the lowest rate of homeownership in the city: only 29% of Black households own their home.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Victorville residents in general are less likely to own their own home than residents of Apple Valley. Similar disparities by race/ethnicity are present in both jurisdictions. Black households are least likely to own their home, and Asian/Pacific Islander households, followed by White, Non-Hispanic households, are most likely to be homeowners.
In the region, the overall homeownership rate (62%) is slightly lower than Apple Valley’s but higher than Victorville’s. Disparities by race/ethnicity are also present in the region and align with the disparities present in Apple Valley and Victorville. Homeownership rates for White and Asian/Pacific Islander households are highest in the region (71% and 70%, respectively.
Homeownership rates for Black households in the region are the lowest, at 42%, which is still significantly higher than the Black homeownership rate in Victorville. The homeownership rate for Native Americans households is 52% and for Hispanic households it is 56%.
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT B
Citizen Participation Plan
CITY OF VICTORVILLE - CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
Amended: May 5, 2020 (Amendments Underlined)
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Since 1997, the City of Victorville (the “City”) has received an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In 2003, the City formed a HOME Investment Partnership Program Consortium with the Town of Apple Valley (the “HOME Consortium”) in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME entitlement status with HUD. The City receives both CDBG and HOME funding annually.
As an Entitlement City, the City is required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The Con Plan is a plan of three to five years in length, which reviews and considers the housing and community development needs of the City, establishes priorities for CDBG and HOME funds, creates and institutes an Annual Action Plan (AP) for meeting current and future needs, and identifies the City’s performance in meeting its annual goals through the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
The AFH replaces the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) to assist the City in identifying fair housing issues and related contributing factors to achieve comprehensive community development goals and affirmatively further fair housing. The Con Plan, A P Plan and AFH are also required to have a strategy for resident and citizen participation in the planning process. According to 24 CFR § 91.105 and as a condition of federal funding , the City must adopt and follow a Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) describing how the City will encourage participation from residents and citizens of all ages, genders, economic levels, races, ethnicities and special needs to provide them with equal access in the development of the Con Plan, A P and AFH, and to ensure their issues and concerns are adequately addressed. Participation shall include community-based and regionally-based organizations that represent and assist protected class members and organizations that enforce fair housing laws.
II. PURPOSE OF THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
The purpose of the CPP is to provide the method and process by which the City’s Con Plan, AP and AFH processes will comply with the citizen participation requirements set forth by HUD pursuant to 24 CFR §
91.105 and the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Final Rule (24 CFR §§ 5.150 through 5.180). This CPP states the process of soliciting the views and recommendations from the public, as well as the process for incorporating public comments and views into the objectives and outcomes developed in the Con Plan, AP, and AFH. This CPP and the participation process shall be implemented and monitored by the City’s Development Department.
III. DEVELOPMENT OF AFH, CON PLAN, AP, AND CAPER; SUBSEQUENT
REVISIONS AND SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTS
Introductory Note. The citizen participation processes and procedures associated with each of the planning documents/reports discussed in this Section are detailed in Section V of this CPP and further described in tabular format on page 5 (the “Summary Table”).
2 Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The AFH is required every five years prior to the preparation of the Con Plan. When preparing an AFH , the City will make HUD -provided data and other supplemental information available to interested citizens, residents, agencies and organizations in an effort to provide meaningful analyses of local fair housing conditions and issues. The City shall publish a notice announcing the availability of this data /information and requesting the views of the residents at a public hearing at least ten (10) days prior to the date of such hearing. In addition, prior to the City adopting and submitting the final AFH to HUD, at least one thirty (30) day public comment period will be provided (after publication of notice and the draft AFH) and a second public hearing will be noticed and held to obtain further citizen input. The City may choose to conduct this hearing in conjunction with one of the two required public hearings on the Con Plan.
AFH Revisions. Pursuant to 24 CFR §5.164, t he City shall consider an AFH previously accepted by HUD to require modification (“Revisions”) and re-submission to HUD in the following instances:
When the City’s circumstances change in a way that affects the information on which the AFH is based, to the extent that the analysis, the fair housing contributing factors, or the priorities and goals of the AFH are no longer applicable or reflect actual circumstances. Examples of changed circumstances include:
o Presidentially declared disasters affecting the City that significantly impact the steps the City may need to take to affirmatively further fair housing; o Significant changes in the City’s demographic;
o The occurrence of new significant contributing factors in the City’s jurisdiction o civil rights findings, determinations, settlements (including Voluntary Compliance Agreements) or court orders
Upon HUD’s written notification specifying a material change that requires the Revisions Revisions may not necessarily require the submission of an entirely new AFH. Revisions need only focus on the material change and appropriate adjustments to the analy ses, assessments, priorities, or goals.
AFH Revisions will be published and noticed for public comment and hearing (see Summary Table).
Consolidated Plan (C on Plan); Annual Action Plan (AP) . The Con Plan examines housing and community development needs, sets priorities for grant monies and establishes a strategic plan with specific measurable goals to address priority needs. Prior to adopting the Con Plan or AP, the City will make available to citizens, public agencies, and other interested parties:
The amount of assistance the City expects to receive; The range of activities that may be undertaken with such funds; The amount of funds proposed to be used for activities and the estimated benefit to low and moderate income persons; and
The City’s plans to minimize displacement of persons and what type of assistance will be made available to those persons displaced.
At least one (1) public hearing will be noticed and held during the development of the Con Plan and AP to receive public comment and incorporate citizen participation . In addition, a second public hearing regarding the contents of the Con Plan / AP will be noticed and conducted prior to the City’s adoption of these documents and submission to HUD. Notices of such public hearings will be published at least ten (10) days in advance or as specified in the Summary Table. At least thirty (30) days prior to adoption, copies of the proposed Con Plan, AP, and any Substantial Amendments (defined below) will be published by the City (made available for publ ic review) and a thirty (30) day public comment period will be noticed and provided. The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to public noticing, public hearing, and publishing requirements in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
3 CAPER. At least fifteen (15) days prior to submission to HUD, copies of the CAPER will published and a like period of public comment will be noticed and provided.
Substantial Amendments . The occurrence of any of the following circumstances shal l require a modification of the Con Plan or AP (“Substantial Amendment”), which shall be noticed, heard, published for comment and adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section V of this CPP, as applicable:
A significant shift is proposed in allocation priorities, or a substantial change in the method of distributing funds;
An activity not included in the AP is proposed for funding; To use funds, including program income, not previously described in the Annual Action Plan; An activity included in the AP is proposed for elimination; The amount allocated to any activity is proposed to be increased or decreased from the amount described in the AP by more than 25%; or
Change in the location of the activity, target area, beneficiaries, eligibility c riteria, or general scope from that described in the AP.
IV. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS – OPPORTUNITIES AND PARTICIPATION Citizen Participation. Citizens and residents should be afforded the maximum feasible opportunity to :
provide input on housing and community development needs; address issues/problems affecting low- and moderate- income persons; learn about various programs available and the expected amount of assistance provided/allowed by each opportunity; develop local project proposals; give input to project selections and funding distributions; and participate in the implementation of funded activities. The procedures in this Section are designed to encourage persons of low and moderate income, particularly those per sons residing in slum and blighted and other City- targeted revitalization areas ; minorities; non-English speaking persons ; persons with disabilities ; persons with HIV/AIDS and their families ; and homeless persons to participate in the planning, implementat ion and assessment of the documents and reports described in this CPP . The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to the Public Participation process in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
Organizational Participation. In developing and implementing the Con Plan and AFH, the City shall encourage participation of local and regional institutions and government agencies; public housing authorities, adjoining cities; Continuums of Care; and other organizations (including businesses, developers, nonprofit organizations, philanthropic organizations, and community- based and faith- based organizations). In conjunction with consultation with public housing authorities, the City shall further encourage the residents of public and assisted housing developments, including their resident advisory boards, councils or management corporations, to participate in the development and implementation of the Con Plan and AFH. In addition to conducting required public hearings and providing public comment periods, the City will encourage citizen and organizational participation by conducting surveys, community outreach meetings, forming focus groups and engaging in other outreach processes. The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to the Organizational Participation process in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
V. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS – PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES
Public Hearings and Comment Periods . Public hearings provide citizens, residents and organiz ations with opportunities to make oral and/or written comments on community needs and on the various planning documents described herein. Public hearings and other meetings shall be held at times and in locations convenient to potential and actual program beneficiaries. Providing time periods during which citizens, residents and other members of the public are given the opportunity to submit written and oral comments on draft documents published by the City (“Comment Period(s)”) , further facilitates
4 community input and feedback. The requirements for publishing notices of public hearings and Comment Periods, as well as publication of draft documents , are detailed below and further explained in the Summary Table.
Noticing Public Hearings . To ensure citizens, residents, and organizations are advised in advance of opportunities to attend and participate in public hearings, all public hearing notices shall adhere to the following unless otherwise waived by HUD and approved by the City Manager or their designee. Be published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date (unless the public hearing notice is combined with a thirty (30) day public comment notice, in which case notice will be published at least thirty (30) days prior to the close of the public comment period and the date of the public hearing as further described in Noticing Public Comment Periods, below. Be published in one or more newspapers of general circulation (as legal notices and/or display ads)
Be prepared in a language other than English when a significant number of non- English residents can reasonably expected to participate
Include the time, date and place of the hearing, a descript ion of the subject/purpose of the hearing, and where associated documents (if applicable) are posted or may otherwise be obtained Include information on how to request special accommodations Be posted on the City’s website ( https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/legally-required- postings) on or before the date of publication
Be subject to the provision of additional forms of notice, including: posting and/or distributing notices at community locations such as the public library, hospitals, other public agency locations, specified locations at Victorville City Hall and in targe t neighborhoods; sending electronic mail to the EDDHD’s list of interested persons; and creation and distribution of supplemental flyers and/or mailers
Noticing Public Comment Periods . Comment Periods may be included in public hearing notices (provided the applicable advance comment period is accounted for). Comment Period notices shall adhere to the following unless otherwise waived by HUD and approved by the City Manager or their designee.
Be published prior to the commencement date of the applicable Comment Period Be published, prepared and posted in the manner provided for Noticing Public Hearings, above In cases where a public hearing is noticed in conjunction with a required Comment Period, provide for a Comment Period that ends prior to the date of the public hearing Include the time, date and place of any associated public hearing and how to request reasonable accommodations
Include the beginning and ending dates of the Comment Period; how and where comments may be submitted; a brief description of the subject matter/purpose of the document or item on which comment is being sought; a summary of the item or content of the documents; how/where full copies of any document(s) may be obtained; and the date the City Council will consider the approval of the item or document(s)
Be posted on the City’s website, various locations in and around City Hall, and in such other places as specified in Noticing Public Hearings, above
Publication of Draft Planning Documents . Notices of public hearings and Comment Periods shall contain summaries of the contents of any draft documents being provided for public review and comment (e.g., the AFH, Con Plan, AP and Revisions or Substantial Amendments). All such draft documents will be made available to members of the public “published” by the City by providing copies on its website, at City Hall, and in such other places as shall be specified in each applicable public hearing or Comment Period notice. Such notices will also contain instructions on how the public may request such documents in alternative formats for persons with disabilities.
5 Technical Assistance. Development Department staff will meet with groups or individuals representative of persons of low - and moderate -income upon request to provide them with technical assistance in commenting on the AFH, identifying specific needs, and/or developing/preparing project proposal applications for programs covered by the Con Plan.
6 Summary Table
Publication of Notices of Public Hearings and Comment Periods Document Publication of Public Hearing (PH) and
Comment Period (CP) Notices†
Minimum Number of
Public Hearings; Timing†
Comment
Period (CP)†
Con Plan /AP
PH Notice - At least 10 days†† prior to PH date
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
First Hearing:
Prior to drafting Con
Plan/AP
Second Hearing:
After publication of Con
Plan/AP draft and close of
CP
N/A
30 days
Substantial
Amendments
to Con Plan /
AP
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
One Hearing:
After publication of
Substantial Amendments
and close of CP
30 days
AFH
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
First Hearing:
After publication of HUD-
provided and other data
Second Hearing:
After publication of AFH
draft and close of CP (may
be combined with second
Con Plan hearing after
initial adoption of AFH)
N/A
30 days
AFH
Revisions
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
One Hearing:
After publication of draft
Revisions and close of CP
30 days
CAPER
CP Notice - At least 15 days prior to CP close
Not required
15 days
† All required noticing requirements, mandatory public hearings, and comment periods can be adjusted in accordance with any waivers provided by HUD, as approved by the City Manager or their designee. †† All references days in this Summary table refer to calendar days
7 Consideration of Public Comments/Views. Prior to adopting the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER and/or Revisions or Substantial Amendments, the City will consider any comments/view received from citizens and residents ( individuals or groups representing their interests) in writing during Comment Periods, or orally during public hearing(s). Such comments/views shall be summarized and attached to the final versions of the AFH, Con Plan, AP, any Revisions or Substantial Amendments, and the CAPE R as applicable.
Questions and Complaints. Development Department staff will answer all questions received from residents or their representative groups in the manner in which the questions were posed ( e.g., verbal responses to verbal requests, written responses to written requests). Written complaints and grievances received from residents or their representative groups relating to the Con Plan, AP, CAPER, AFH, and/or any Substantial Amendments or Revisions , shall be substantively responded to by Development Department staff within fifteen (15) working days of receipt, where practicable.
Access to / Availability of Records . The City will provide residents of the community, public agencies and other interested parties with reasonable and timely access to the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER, CPP, all Substantial Amendments or Revisions, and information/records related to these documents (including the use of assistance under the CDBG and HOME programs for the preceding five (5) years) by:
Maintaining copies at City Hall for public inspection and m aking a reasonable number of copies (paper or electronic) of the AFH , Con Plan and CPP available to residents and other groups that request them free of charge
Making copies of other documents and records available in accordance with the California Public Records Act (direct costs of duplication may apply) Posting these documents and related information on the City’s website Maintaining copies of the final versions of the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER and CPP on the City’s website, at City Hall and at the City’s Public Library Providing such documents and records in an accessible format for persons with disabilities, upon forty-eight (48) hours’ advance request
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); Accessibility. In compliance with the ADA, if special assistance to participate in public hearings and/or community or consultation meetings is needed, individuals should contact Development Department staff forty-eight ( 48) hours prior to the meeting or public hearing to ensure that the City will be able to make reasonable arrangements. Examples of assistance provided may include the following:
Auxiliary aids and services to communicate with people who have communication disabilities, such as providing a qualified reader; providing information on large print; or providing an audio recording of printed information for individuals who are blind, have vision loss, or are deaf-blind.
A “qualified” reader means someone who is able to read effectively, accurately, and impartially, using any necessary specialized vocabulary;
For people who are de af, have hearing loss, or are deaf -blind, the City may provide a qualified notetaker; a qualified sign language interpreter; written materials; or a printed script of a stock speech (such as given on a museum or historic house tour). A “qualified” interpre ter means someone who is able to interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially, both receptively ( i.e., understanding what the person with the disability is saying) and expressively (i.e., having the skill needed to convey information back to that person) using any necessary specialized vocabulary.
In addition, persons with disabilities may bring a “companion” to assist them. The term “companion” includes any family member, friend, or associate of a person who is an appropriate person with whom the City should communicate. Public hearings and other m eetings shall be held in areas that are handicap accessible and other accommodations shall be made upon request as noted above.
8 HUD Waivers. Should HUD temporarily suspend/adjust/waive any of the required noticing, comment or participation processes discussed herein regarding the development , review, or amendment of applicable assessments/plans, the City Manager or their designee may approve the application of any such waiver based upon a unique circumstance such as natural disaster, national emergency, state emergency, local emergency, major disaster declaration, etc. that necessitates the use of the waiver provided.
Review, Amendment and Availability of Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) . Prior to its adoption by the City Council, this CCP was made available for public review and comment and at least one public hearing was held. Future Substantial Amendments to the CPP will utilize the public hearing and Comment Period associated with the adoption of Substantial Amendments to the Con Plan.
Amended: May 5, 2020 (Amendments Underlined)
9 Community & Regionally Based Organizations
CHC California Housing Consortium
National Crime Prevention Council
National Coalition for the Homeless
Shelter Network
Latin-American Association
NAACP National Association for the Advancement of Colored People- California Branch NARF Native American Rights Fund
NOMAR National Organization for Mexican-American Rights Big Brothers Big Sisters
California Coalition for Youth
California Youth Advocacy Network
Americans United for Life
California Public Health Association – North
Department of Employment & Human Services
Department of Behavioral Health – San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership High Desert Homeless Services, Inc.
Victor Valley Domestic Violence, Inc.
Moses House Ministries
Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino
San Bernardino Sexual Assault Servicies
Victor Valley Community Services Council
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT C
2023-2024
CDBG/HOME Allocations
City of Victorville 2023-2024 HUD Allocations
CDBG Allocation (City of Victorville)
NAME CDBG21
Victorville $1,381,396
•Funding Categories
Public Service (15%) - $207,209
Construction (65%) - $897,908
Administration (20%) - $276,279
HOME Allocation (Consortium)
NAME ST. Share ($) Approx. Share (%)
VV & AV Consortium CA $911,188 100.0%
Victorville CA $605,850 66.49%
Apple Valley CA $305,338 33.51%
•Consortium Total Allocation - $911,188
oFunding Categories
Housing Activities (75%) - $683,391
CHDO (15%) - $136,679
Administration (10%) - $91,118
•Victorville Total Allocation - 66.49% = $605,850
oFunding Categories
Housing Activities (75%) - $454,388
CHDO (15%) - $90,878
Administration (10%) - $60,584*
* (Pursuant to Consortium Agreement, City eligible to receive half of total HOME Consortium administrative allowance, or $45,559)
•Apple Valley Total Allocation - 33.50% = $305,338
oFunding Categories
Housing Activities (75%) - $229,004
CHDO (15%) - $45,801
Administration (5%) - $30,533
Administration - Victorville share - $15,025
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT D
CDBG Target Area Map
City Council Districts for 2020 Census & 2010 Approved CDBG Areas The City of Victorville
Printed: March 7th, 2022
Author: Brandon Krejckant - GIS Coordinator
Department: Information Technology - GIS Division
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS FOR 2020 CENSUS & 2010 APPROVED CDBG AREAS Disclaimer: Victorville GIS Data is made available for general reference purposes only and should not be used or relied upon without independent verification.
The most current CDGB data is 2010. The City of Victorville does not warrant data accuracy or completeness, nor will the City of Victorville accept liability of any kind in conjunction with its use.
District 2 District 4
District 1
District 3
District 5µ
0 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.20.4
Miles
City of Victorville, Bureau of Land Management, Esri, HERE, Garmin, GeoTechnologies, Inc., USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA Districts
1 2
3 4
5 CDBG Areas
Victorville City Boundary
Item Number: 2
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing
Meeting of: March 5, 2024
Submitted By:
Joe Slegers, Building Official
Subject:
Award of Construction Contract to Monet Construction, Inc. and Notice of Exemption for the New Library Renovation and Expansion, Project JM24-051 Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
1) Conduct the Public Hearing and receive testimony regarding the proposed project and contract;
2) Close the Public Hearing;
3) Find the proposed project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – In-Fill Development Projects;
4) Approve a Construction Agreement in the amount not to exceed $8,621,000.00 to Monet Construction, Inc. for the City Library Renovation and Expansion, Project JM24- 051; and
5) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute change orders in an amount not to exceed $862,100.00 in total, representing a 10% project contingency.
Fiscal Impact:
Acting in accordance with the staff recommendation will result in a fiscal impact of $9,483,100.00, as summarized below.
Description Amount
Construction Agreement Total $8,621,000.00
Maximum Contingency (10%) $862,100.00
Fiscal Impact $9,483,100.00
The Building Forward Library Infrastructure Program Grant, provided by the California State Library, will only fund construction costs related to the base building and expansion of the clubhouse specifically designated for library space. Therefore, the services 3 5
1 4
provided by Monet Construction, Inc. will be funded by a combination of the Building Forward Grant Account (Fund 270) Accounts 2706030-55070-21379 and 2706030- 52110-21379, and Measure P (Fund 105) Account 1056030-52300-80075. Below is a summary of the available budget, construction agreement compensation, and remaining budget funds.
Account Available Funds
2706030-55070-21379 - State Grant Account $4,752,734.00 2706030-52110-21379 - State Grant Account $3,732,051.90 1056030-55060-80075 - Measure P Account $2,759,507.00
Total $11,247,474.00
Description Amount
Available Funds $11,244,292.90
Construction Agreement Compensation $8,621,000.00
Maximum Contingency (10%) $862,100.00
Remaining Budgeted Funds $1,761,192.90
Strategic Plan Goal:
The City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026 identifies multi-year strategic goals and various strategies to work toward achieving those goals. The New Library Renovation and Expansion Project assists in achieving Goal E, Invest in Infrastructure, create a healthy and livable community by maintaining the City’s assets through investment in infrastructure and innovations. Strategy 2 calls for implementation of the Library Master Plan to complete the relocation and expansion of the library to improve and enhance library services in the community.
Background:
Through the Master Plan process, it was determined that the current library facility has inadequate space to serve the City’s current population. The current library facility has a footprint of 8,229 square feet. The City needs approximately 14,990 square feet to serve the current population.
In May 2021, space became available at the Green Tree Golf Course Clubhouse (Clubhouse), prompting staff to investigate the potential for the Library’s relocation. The Clubhouse location was consistent with certain Master Plan recommendations in that it is centrally located, has natural lighting desired for library facilities, and has an improved outdoor area for programming and use by library patrons. Due to a more recent construction date, the Clubhouse site also provides a higher level of code compliance, including enhanced levels of ADA accessibility for visiting patrons. Because of these findings, staff elected to proceed and seek the services of an architectural design firm to redesign the Clubhouse into the City Library.
On March 15, 2022, Council unanimously awarded TR Design Group a contract to conceptualize the Clubhouse as a space that would accommodate both library services and golf operations. With funding for the design and construction supported solely by 3 5
1 4
Measure P, the scope of this project would only include the reconfiguration of the existing building footprint and would yield approximately 12,750 square foot of library space.
On November 4, 2022, staff was notified that the California State Library selected the Victorville City Library to receive $9,035,105.00 in Building Forward Grant funds. At the January 17, 2023, regular meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 23-001, approving a budget amendment for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 to appropriate $9,035,105.00 in both revenue and expenditures related to the Building Forward Library Infrastructure Program Grant as awarded by the California State Library.
By receiving the State Grant, staff was able to revisit the Master Plan recommendations and explore an expansion of the Clubhouse to meet the space needed for the current population. On February 7, 2023, Council unanimously approved to increase the scope of services with TR Design Group to include a 5,094 square foot expansion of the Clubhouse facility, achieving and exceeding the Master Plan goal of producing a total of 17,844 square feet of Library space, which exceeds the current need by 2,854 square feet.
On June 20, 2023, staff presented Council with a conceptual design of the new Library design including a 5,094 square foot, Children’s Library expansion (Attachment A).
Council unanimously approved the conceptual design and granted staff and TR Design Group authorization to continue with generating the construction drawings. Staff has subsequently applied for the required Site Plan approval with an Environmental Exemption through the Planning Department, which was ultimately approved by the Planning Commission on November 3, 2023. A CEQA Notice of Exemption was provided through that process and has been recorded with San Bernardino County on December 4, 2023.
Discussion:
In December 2023, TR Design Group completed the construction drawings, materials specifications, and supporting documents for the new Library. After staff review and approval, a Notice Inviting Bids (NIB) was advertised. On December 13, 2023, staff posted the NIB on the City’s website, in the San Bernardino Sun, and in the Victorville Daily Press. A mandatory job walk was conducted on January 3, 2024, with bids due on February 1, 2024. The following is a summary of bids received.
Contractor Location Bid
Monet Construction, Inc. Tujunga, CA $8,621,000.00
Kemcorp Construction, Inc. Ontario, CA $8,950,000.00
Saifco Construction Company Westlake Village, CA $8,950,000.00 RC Construction Services Redlands, CA $9,464,000.00
ACC Construction, Inc. Cypress, CA $10,000,000.00
Aztec Telecom Corona, CA $10,622,166.07
After review and tabulation of the bid proposals, it was determined that Monet 3 5
1 4
Construction, Inc. is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Staff recommends that the City Council award a Construction Agreement (Attachment B) to Monet Construction, Inc. for the New Library Renovation and Expansion, Project JM24-051 in the amount not to exceed $8,621,000.00.
With a project of this size and due to the nature of the existing construction, minor modifications and scope additions are inevitable. The scope of this project includes the removal of finished surfaces and the exploration of the conditions within existing assemblies. The roof is currently known to have leaks and the infiltration of water may have caused damage that will not be apparent until the roof and ceiling assemblies are removed during the demolition stages. In addition, the expansion of the building requires excavation at depths of up to fifteen feet. Staff anticipates possible uncovering of water, sewer, or other utility lines that may need to be rerouted around the new building footprint. Staff anticipates encountering these and other items that could possibly add to the original scope of work in order to accomplish construction per plans. These situations, and situations similar in nature, typically constitute change orders. The timely execution of change orders is imperative to a project’s schedule, which will require completion by March of 2026 to comply with the deadlines within the grant award, and overall cost.
Municipal Code 2.28.180 (b) states, “the city manager shall have the authority to execute change orders; provided however, that if a single contract change order (or the cumulative amount of change orders on a given public project) exceeds fifteen percent of the total contract price or two hundred thousand dollars (whichever amount is less), the city manager shall obtain city council approval prior to executing the change order.” Due to the anticipated unforeseen situations mentioned above and to streamline the change order approval process, staff requests that the City Council proactively authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute change orders in an amount not to exceed $862,100.00 in total, representing a 10% contingency, as needed for project management. This 10% contingency is in line with the grant application and other documentation which has been provided to the California State Librarian for approval of the grant funding. Any change orders above the 10% contingency would be presented to the City Council for approval. Final project cost inclusive of change orders will be reported back to the City Council later as part of the Notice of Completion.
Pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) entitled “In-Fill Development Projects”, new construction of a building on a site less than five acres in size can be found Categorically Exempt from CEQA if the project meets certain benchmarks. In accordance with the noted CEQA Section 15332, staff finds that the subject proposal meets said benchmarks and is Categorically Exempt from CEQA because:
•The project site is less than five acres in size and substantially surrounded by urban development;
•The proposal is consistent with the underlying General Plan and zoning regulations;
3 5
1 4
•The site has no value as habitat for rare, endangered, threatened, or special status species as it is currently paved and fully improved;
•The development can be served by all required utilities and public services; and •Approval of the project will not result in any significant effects to traffic, noise, air or water or quality.
Staff is available for questions.
Attachments: A. Conceptual Library Design
B. Construction Agreement
Attachment A
Attachment B
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE AND
MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
FOR
NEW LIBRARY RENOVATION AND EXPANSION PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. JM24-051
THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (the “Contract”) dated ______________________ for reference purposes only is made and entered into by and between the City of Victorville, a municipal corporation and charter city located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Monet Construction, Inc., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”. The City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter referred to as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the City requires construction of a renovation and expansion of its existing clubhouse at the Green Tree Golf Course to accommodate a new City library facility , as more fully described in the solicitation documents issued by the City for Project No. JM24-051 (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2023, the City issued a Notic e Inviting Bids and solicitation documents to prospective bidders for the Project. In response, Contractor submitted a Bid which the City determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bid; and WHEREAS, Contractor is a duly organized Corporation in good standing in the State of California, and represents that it has the background, knowledge, experience, expertise and resources to perform the Work and other obligations encompassed by this Contract; and WHEREAS, at its meeting held on ________________________, the Victorville City Council duly accepted Contractor’s Bid for the Project and directed that a written agreement for the Project be entered into with Contractor; and
WHEREAS, in light of the facts set forth above and the certifications made by Contractor as part of its Bid, the City desires to retain Contractor to perform the construction Work for the Project as set forth in this Contract and in the Contract Documents, as hereinafter described.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND
PROMISES CONTAINED HEREIN AND FOR SUCH OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. RECITALS
The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Contract by this City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 1
reference, as though set forth herein.
Section 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
a. Contract Documents. The Contract Documents consist of the following documents, all of which are either attached hereto as exhibits or are incorporated herein by this reference. Said Contact Documents are complementary; what is called for in one is binding as if called for in all, and together constitute Contractor’s performance obligations:
(1) This Contract and its attached Exhibits, subject to the limitations in Sections 9 and 20 with respect to Exhibit “A” (Contractor’s submitted Bid Proposal as accepted by the City); (2) Change Orders issued and approved by the City;
(3) Regulatory Permits f
rom other agencies specified in Appendices A and B of the bid package or as may otherwise be required by law;
(4) Bid Addenda issued by the City;
(5) Notice Inviting Bids and Instructions to Bidders;
(6) Special Provisions
(7) Appendices
(8) Plans
(9) Bid Forms
and attachment thereto;
(10) Faithful Performance Bond;
(11) Payment Bond.
b. Interpretation. In the event of any conflict between any of the Contract Documents, the document highest in the order of precedence (from highest to lowest), as set forth in Subsection a. above shall control.
Section 3. C ONTRACTOR’S OBLIGATIONS
Contractor will perform all of the Work required for the Project, as specified in the Contract Documents.
Contractor must provide, furnish, and supply all things necessary and incidental for the timely per
formance and completion of the Work, including all necessary labor, materials, supplies, tools, equi
pment, transportation, onsite facilities, and utilities, unless otherwise specified in the Contract D
ocuments. Contractor must use its best efforts to diligently prosecute and complete the Work in a professional and expeditious manner
and to meet or exceed the performance standards required by the Contract Documents, and to the satisfaction of Joseph Slegers, Building Official, or his designee, (hereinafter the “Project Manager”).
Section 4. CONTRACT P
RICE; PAYMENT AND RETENTION
As full and complete compensation for Contractor’s timely performance and completion of t he Work in strict ac cordance with t he terms and conditions of the Contract D ocuments, C ity w ill pay Contractor Eight Million Six Hundred Twenty-one Thousand and 00/100 DOLLARS, ($8,621,000.00) (the “Contract Price”) for all of Contractor’s direct and indirect costs to perform the Work, including all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, taxes, insurance, bonds and all overhea d costs, i n accordance with Contractor’s Bid Proposal (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) subject to the provisions of this Contract and the Contract Documents.
Procedures relating to payment and retention are as follows:
On or about the first of each calendar month, Contractor shall request payment for all work City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 2
a.
b.
(1)
performed prior to such date. Each payment request shall be accompanied by an updated progress schedule indicating progress achieved to that date, properly completed payroll documents, and such other documentation/data as the City may reasonably require to substantiate Contractor’s estimate of Work completed to date. Upon approval by the City’s Building Official, or his/her designee, of the Contractor's estimate of Work completed, the City will make a progress payment to the Contractor in an amount equal to the approved estimate, less a retention of five percent (5%), and less the total of all previous payments made. In preparing payment requests/estimates, the material delivered on the site, preparatory work done, and the cost of bonds and insurance paid may be taken into consideration. The City shall make payments on any properly completed and undisputed payment request submitted by Contractor within thirty (30) day of receipt thereof; however, payment requests shall not be deemed properly completed unless all required documents, including the certified payroll documents specified in Section 9 of this Agreement, have been properly submitted and reviewed by the City.
(2) Upon receipt of not
ice from Contractor that the Work is ready for final inspection, the City shall make such inspection and shall accept the Work if it determines the Work has been fully and properly completed. Upon City’s acceptance of the Work, Contractor shall make a request for final payment, which request shall include appropriate invoices, lien releases, certified payrolls, and such other substantiating data as City may reasonably require. With the exception of any disputed amounts withheld in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 7106 and/or amounts required by law to be withheld by valid Stop Payment Notices , final payment shall be made and retention shall be released to Contractor by the City not less than sixty (60) days after the Work has been accepted.
Section 5. CONTRACT T
IME; NOTICE TO PROCEED
a. Contract Time. The Work under this Agreement shall be diligently prosecuted to completion before expiration of Eighteen (18) MONTHS, commencing within Fifteen (15) calendar days after the issuance of the Notice to Proceed. The City will not issue a Notice to Proceed to the Contractor until this Contract, including bonds and insurance documents, have been executed and/or approved by the City.
b. Notice to Proceed. No work, service, material, or equipment shall be performed or furnished
under this Contract unless and until a Notice to Proceed has been given to the Contractor by the City. Contractor shall commence Work pursuant to the Contract Documents and as directed by the City in the Notice to Proceed, and diligently execute the same to completion within the Contract Time.
Section
6. DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND CLAIMS PROCEDURES
a. Public Contract Code Section 9204. For purposes of any Public Works Claims filed by a Contractor or Subcontractor (as those terms are defined in Public Contract Code Section 9204) under this
Contract, the claims procedures in Public Contract Code Section 9204 (“Section 9204”) and the provisions of this Section shall apply. Public Contract Code Section 9204 is set forth in full in Section 2-10 of the Special Provis ions.
(1) In the event of a Section 9204 Public Works Claim, Contractor may not stop working pending resolution of the dispute, but must continue to comply with its duty to diligently prosecute the performance and timely completion of the Work during the Section 9204 process.
City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 3
(2) Any Public Works Claims not resolved by the Section 9204 procedures (and/or any tort claims) shall be subject to Section 2.24.020 of the Victorville Municipal Code (“VMC”) and the provisions of the Government Claims Act (Government Code section 810 et seq.). b. For disputes or
claims that do not constitute Public Works Claims, City and Contractor agree to comply with the following process:
(1) Each Party s
hall designate a senior management or executive level representative to negotiate any dispute.
(2) The representati
ves shall attempt, through good faith negotiations, to resolve the dispute by any means within their authority.
(3) If the iss
ue remains unresolved after ten (10) days of good faith negotiations, the Parties shall attempt to resolve the disagreement by negotiation between the legal counsel for each Party.
If the above process fails, the Parties may mutually agree to engage in non-binding mediation or arbitration in which the Parties equally share the costs of any mediator or arbitrator, or may proceed with suit or other remedies, subject to the provisions of subparagraph (5) of this Subsection and other applicable provisions and laws.
(4) The alternativ
e dispute resolution process set forth herein is a material condition to Contract and must be exhausted as an administrative remedy prior to either Party initiating legal action. (5) Compliance w
ith VMC Section 2.24.020 and the provisions of the Government Claims Act (Government Code section 810 et seq.) is also required prior to initiating suit again the City.
Section 7. TE
RMINATION O F AGREEMENT FOR CONVENIENCE
a. The City may
, by providing thirty (30) days' advance written notice to Contractor, terminate this Agreement in whole or in part, whenever the City shall determine that such termination is in the best interests of the City, or when it becomes impracticable or impossible to proceed, or because of conditions or events beyond the control of the City. Any such termination shall be effected by delivery to Contractor of a Notice of Termination for Convenience, specifying the extent to which performance of Work under this Agreement is terminated, and the date upon which such termination becomes effective. Upon such termination, the obligations of the Contractor for portions of the Work already performed shall continue. b. Upon receipt of
a Notice of Termination for Convenience, the Contractor shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, do the following:
(1) Immediately discontinue the Work to the extent specified in the notice. (2) Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, equipment, services, or facilities, except as may be necessary to complete such portion(s) of the Work that are not to be discontinued. (3) Promptly cancel, on the most favorable terms reasonably possible, all subcontracts to the extent that they relate to the performance of the discontinued portion of the Work. (4) Thereafter do only such Work as may be necessary to preserve and protect the Work already in progress and to protect materials, plants, and equipment on the Project site or in transit thereto. c. Upon such ter
mination, the Contractor will be paid without duplication for:
City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 4
(1) Work completed in accordance with the Contract Documents prior to the effective date of the Notice of Termination for Convenience;
(2) Reasonable costs incurred in settlement of terminated contracts with Subcontractors, suppliers and others; and
(3) Reasonable expenses directly attributable to termination.
The Contract
or shall submit a final termination settlement proposal to the City no later than ninety (90) days from the effective date of termination, unless extended in writing by the City, upon written request by the Contractor. If the Contractor fails to submit a proposal, the City may determine the amount, if any, due the Contractor as a result of the termination. The City will pay the Contractor the amount it determines is reasonable. If the Contractor disagrees with the amount determined by the City as being reasonable, the Contractor shall provide notice to the City within thirty (30) Days of receipt of payment. Any amount due shall be subject to the dispute resolution provisions set forth in the Contract Documents. d. Contracto
r shall include provisions in all of its subcontracts, purchase orders, and other contracts permitting termination for convenience by Contractor on terms that are consistent with this Contract and that afford no greater rights of recovery against Contractor than are afforded to Contractor under this Section 7.
Section 8. TERM
INATIO N FOR CONTRACTOR’S DEFAULT
a. Default. The City may terminate this Contract for Contractor’s default as set forth in this Section. The City will consider the Contractor in default of this Contract if, prior to the City’s acceptance of the Work, the Contractor:
(1) becomes ins
olvent, assigns its assets for the benefit of its creditors, is unable to pay its debts as they become due, or is otherwise financially unable to complete the Work; (2) abandons the Work by failing to report to the Work site and diligently prosecute the Work to completion;
(3) disregards written instructions from the City or materially violates provisions of the Contract Documents;
(4) fails to prosecute the Work according to the schedule approved by the Engineer, (5) disregards laws or regulations of any public body having jurisdiction, or (6) commits continuous or repeated violations of regulatory or statutory safety requirements.
Notices, and other written communications regarding default between the Contractor, the City, and the Surety shall be transmitted in accordance with Section 21 of this Contract. b. Notice and Opportunity to Cure. The City will issue a written notice to cure the default to the Contractor and its Surety. The Contractor shall commence satisfactory corrective actions within five (5) Working Days after receipt. If the Contractor fails to commence satisfactory corrective action within five (5) Working Days after receipt of the notice to cure, or to diligently continue satisfactory and timely correction of the default thereafter, the City will consider the Contractor in default of the Contract and:
(1) will terminate the Contractor’s right to perform under the Contract by issuing a writ ten notice
of termination for default to the Contractor and its Surety; (2) may use any materials, equipment, tools or other facilities furnished by the Contractor to secure and maintain the Work site, and
(3) may furnish labor, equipment, and materials the City deems necessary to secure and maintain the Job Site;
c. Remedies Cumulative. The provisions of this Section shall be in addition to all other legal rights and City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 5
remedies available to the City. Termination of this Contract will not relieve the Surety of its obligation for any just claims arising out of the Work performed.
Section 9. PREVAI
LING WAG E
a. Compliance with State Prevailing Wage Requirements. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1773, the City has obtained from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations (“ DIR”) the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing wage rate for holiday and overtime work applicable in San Bernardino County for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Work required under this Contract. A copy of these prevailing wage rates are on file at the City’s Finance Department/Purchasing Division and shall be made available for review to any interested party on request. In addition, a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages may be obtained via the internet at: http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD. Contractor and all Subcontractors shall pay not less than said specified State of California rates to all workers employed by them in the execution of the Work contemplated by this Contract, including workers performing Work described in or encompassed by California Labor Code (“ Labor Code”) Sections 1720 through 1720.9, 1771, and 1772. Contractor shall be solely responsible for using the correct and current prevailing wage rates. and performing accordingly. An error on the part of any awarding body does not relieve the Contractor from the responsibility for payment of the correct prevailing wage, or compliance with the maintenance and inspection of payroll records, posting of prevailing wage rates at the work/job site, employment of apprentices, and other requirements of Labor Code Section 1720 et seq .; Labor Code Section 1810 et seq.; California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq.; and all other applicable State labor laws.
b. Conflict. It is further expressly agreed by and between the Parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this Section 9 and the provisions of Exhibit “A”, the terms of this Section 9 shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of the terms of Contractor’s submitted Bid Proposal conflicting with the requirements of this Section 9. c. Payroll Records. Contractor must comply with the provisions of Labor Code sections 1776 and 1812 and all implementing regulations, including without limitation, those set forth in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 16000 et seq. (hereinafter the “ Regulations”), which are fully incorporated by this reference, including requirements for electronic submission of payroll records to the DIR.
(1) Contractor
and Subcontractor Obligations. Contractor and each Subcontractor must keep accurate payroll records, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed in connection with the Work. Each payroll record must contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under penalty of perjury, stating both of the following:
(a) The informati
on contained in the payroll record is true and correct; and (b) Contract
or or the Subcontractor has complied with the requirements of Labor Code Sections 1771, 1811, and 1815 for any Work performed by its employees on the Project.
(2) Certified
Record. A certi fied copy of an employee’s payroll record must be made available for inspection or furnished to the employee or his or her authorized representative on City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 6
request, to City, to the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, to the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the DIR, and as further required by the Labor Code. (3) Enforc
ement. Upon notice of noncompliance with Labor Code § 1776, Contractor or Subcontractor has ten days in which to comply with the requirements of this section. If Contractor or Subcontractor fails to do so within the ten-day period, Contractor or Subcontractor will forfeit a penalty of $100.00 per day, or portion a day, for each worker for whom compliance is required, until strict compliance is achieved. Upon request by the Division of Apprenticeship Standards, or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, these penalties will be withheld from payments then due to Contractor.
d. Apprentices. Contractor is responsible for compliance with the requirements governing employment and payment of apprentices, as set forth in Labor Code section 1777.5, which is fully incorporated by reference.
e. Notices. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1771.4, Contractor is required to post all Job Site notices, including prevailing wage rates and other notices as required by regulation. f. Other Labor Requirements. Contractor has the responsibility for and shall comply with all other requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., Labor Code Section 1810 et seq., the Regulations, and all other applicable State labor laws. Contractor further acknowledges and agrees that it will be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with those laws. Contractor shall require the same of all its Subcontractors. g. Statutory Penalties. The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wage or to comply with State wage and hour laws will be enforced as follows:
(1) Pursuant to
Labor Code section 1775, the Contractor and any Subcontractor under it shall forfeit as a penalty to the City not more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing wage rate as determined by the Director of the DIR for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any public work done under this Contract by it or by any Subcontractor under it. The difference between such prevailing wage rate and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof, for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate, shall be paid to each worker by the Contractor.
(2) Pursuant
to Labor Code Section 1813, Contractor or Subcontractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of this Contract by the respective Contractor or Subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week, except as specified in Labor Code Section 1815. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1810 et seq., eight (8) hours is the legal working day. h. DIR Monitoring. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, the Contract for this Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. i. DIR Registration. Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Contractor and its Subcontractors must be registered with the DIR prior to the execution of a contract to perform public works. By entering into this Contract, Contractor represents that it is aware of the registration requirement and is currently registered with the DIR. Contractor shall maintain a current registration for the duration of the Project. Contractor shall further include the requirements of Labor Code sections City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 7
1725.5 and 1771.1 in any subcontract and ensure that all Subcontractors are registered at the time this Contract is entered into and maintain registration for the duration of the Project.
Section 10. LIQU IDATED DAMAGES
If Contractor fails to complete the Work within the Contract Time, City will assess liquidated damages in the amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($2,500.00) per day for each day of unexcused delay in completion, and such liquidated damages may be deducted from City’s payments due or to become due to Contractor under this Contract.
Section 11. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
a. Contractor shall
comply with all local, state, and federal laws and regulations applicable to the performance of the Work required by the Contract Documents, including any rule, regulation, or bylaw governing the conduct or performance of Contractor, its employees, officers, board members, agents, independent contractors, and Subcontractors. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, all required permits and licenses, including a City business license and a valid California contractor’s license of the type/class(es) specified in the Contract Documents, shall be held or obtained by the Contractor at its sole expense prior to commencing any Work hereunder and maintained throughout the Contract term.
b. Contractor and al
l subcontractors shall further comply with: the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Cal. Gov. Code §12900 et seq.) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11000 et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Gov. Code §§ 11135- 11139.5), and the regulations or standards adopted by the State Library to implement such article. Contractor shall not hire or employ any person to perform work within the City or allow any person to perform work required under this Contract unless such person is properly documented and legally entitled to be employed within the United States. The Contractor and all subcontractors shall also comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Cal.
Gov. Code §8350 et seq.).
Section 12. WORKERS’ C
OMPEN SATION CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Labor Code
§ 1861, by signing this Contract, Contractor certifies as follows: “I am aware of the provisions of Labor Code § 3700 which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work on this Contract.”
Section 13. INSURANCE
a. Contractor shall procure and maintain at its own expense at all times during the period covered by this Contract (and through a five- year period following the date of City’s acceptance of the Project) the following policies of insurance:
(1) Commercial G
eneral Liability (“CGL”) Insurance: Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $5,000,000 per occurrence resulting from the acts or omissions of the Cont ractor or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents, and independent contractors. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 8
project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Commercial V
ehicle Liability Insurance: Covering person injury and property damage, of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit, covering any vehicle utilized by Contractor or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, or agents and independent contractors in performing the Work required by this Contract. (3) Workers’ Compensa
tion Insurance: Providing coverage as required by the California State Workers’ Compensation Law and Employers’ Liability insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If any class of employees employed by Contractor is not protected by the California State Workers’ Compensation Law, Contractor shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the City. (4) Course of Constr
uction, Builders’ Risk, or Inland Marine Insurance for Work on Site: Issued on an occurrence basis, for all -risk or “all perils” coverage on a 100% completed value basis on the insurable portion of the Project for the benefit of City, that offers “Installation” coverage for all materials, supplies, equipment, and property obtained by, or for Contractor, which is to become part of the Work while such equipment and property is stored at the jobsite, at temporary locations, or while in transit to the Project from such temporary locations. Contractor shall also be responsible for insuring its owned, leased/rented, or borrowed equipment. (a) City of Vic
torville shall be named as a Loss Payee.
(b) If the Proj
ect does not involve new or major reconstruction, at the option of the City, an Installation Floater may be acceptable. For such projects, a Property Installation Floater shall be obtained that provides for the improvement, remodel, modification, alteration, conversion or adjustment to existing buildings, structures, processes, machinery, and equipment. The Property Installation Floater shall provide property damage coverage for any building, structure, machinery, or equipment damaged, impaired, broken, or destroyed during the performance of the Work, including during transit, installation, and testing at the Project/Work site. b. Additional Insurance
Requirements. With respect to the policies of insurance set forth above, compliance with the following is also required:
(1) Additional Insur
eds. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any required insurance policies or any subsequent endorsements attached thereto, the protection offered by all policies, except for Workers' Compensation coverage, shall bear an endorsement whereby it is provided that, the City and its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors, including, without limitation, the City Attorney, are named as Additional Insureds. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Victorville, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. (2) Waiver of Subr
ogation Rights. Contractor shall require the carriers of all required insurance policies to waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its elected or appointed officers, officials, volunteers, employees, contractors, and subcontractors. Each poli cy of insurance shall be endorsed to reflect such waiver.
City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 9
(3) Sufficiency of Insurers. Contractor must secure all policies of insurance required by this Contract from a good and responsible company or companies authorized to do insurance business in the State of California, with an AM Best’s rating of not less than A;VII. (4) Proof of I
nsurance Coverage Required Prior to Commencement of Work. Within ten (10) days of
the date Contractor receives this Contract from the City for execution (following award of same
by the City Council), certificates of insurance evidencing the policies of insurance, coverages,
and endorsements required by this Contract and satisfactory to and approved by the City shall be furnished by Contractor to the City’s Risk Manager. In no event shall any Work on the P
roject be permitted to commence until adequate proof of insurance and endorsements have been so furnished. The City reserves the option to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by this Contract at any time. (5) Grant Compliance. Contractor’s insurance must als o be in compliance with all insurance requirements set forth in the State Library Grant Agreement funding document referenced in Section 14 of this Contract. The stricter standard shall apply in the event of a conflict. (6) Other Required Endorsements.
(a) The policies shall be endorsed to provide that in the event of cancellation or amendment of any required insurance policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than thirty (30) days before the c ancellation or amendment is effectiv e. In the case of canc ellation for non-payment, ten (10) days advance written notice shall be given.
(b) The CGL and v ehicle liability policies shall be endorsed as Primary and Non- contributory. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. c. Subcontractors. Contractor must ensure that each Subcontractor is required to obtain and maintain the same insurance coverage required under this Section 13 with respect to its performance of Work on the Project, including thos e requirements related to the Additional Ins ureds and waiver of subrogation. Contractor mus t confirm that each Subcontractor has complied with these insurance requirements before the Subcontractor is permitted to begin Work on the Project.
Upon request by the City, Contractor must provide certificates and endorsements submitted by each Subcontractor to prove compliance with this requirement. The insurance requirements for Subcontractors do not replace or limit the Contractor’s insurance obligations. d. Self-insured retenti
ons must be declared to and approved by the City.
e. The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Lability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and whic h also apply to a loss cov ered hereunder, s hall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Contractor’s primary and umbrella or excess liability policies are exhausted.
f. If any coverage required is written on a claims-made coverage from:
City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 10
(1) The retroac
tive date must be shown, and this date must be before the execution date of the Agreement or the beginning of work.
(2) Insurance
must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of work.
(3) If cove
rage is cancelled or non- renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the agreement effective, or start of work date, the Contractor must purchase extended reporting period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.
(4) A copy of
the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review. g. Commerc
ial General Liability and Umbrella or Excess Liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of five (5) years from Completed Operations liability coverage. Such insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least a number of five (5) years after completion of the contract Work.
h. Contractor
shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage, subcontractors shall provide coverage with a form at least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13. The Contractor shall not require certified Small Business subcontractors to carry Liability Insurance that exceeds the limit in Section (a)(1) of this Contract. The maximum required Liability Insurance limits in Section (a)(1) of this Contract shall apply to certified Small Business subcontractors for work performed on the Project, regardless of tier. i. The City re
serves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Section 14. A
DDITION AL STATE GRANT REQUIREMENTS
a. Contractor
has been advised and acknowledges that the Project is being funded in whole or in part with A California State Library Grant (Award Agreement Number BF-2- 21-011). Contractor shall be required to comply with all applicable provisions of that Grant Award Agreement, including without limitation, the following:
(1) Non-Discrimina tion. Contractor and subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. Contractor shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of contractors, employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment.
(2) Access.
Contractor shall permit access by representatives of the Department of Civil Rights and the State Library upon reasonable notice at any time during the normal business hours, but in no case less than 24 hours’ notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, and all other sources of information and its facilities as said Department or the State Library shall require ascertaining compliance with this clause. Contractor and its City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 11
subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. (See Cal.
Code Regs., tit. 2, §11105.). Such access is in addition to the audit access requirements set forth in Section 17 of this Contract.
(3) Rus
sian Sanctions. Executive Order N-6- 22 – Russian Sanctions: On March 4, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N6- 22 (the “EO”) regarding economic sanctions in response to Russian aggression in Ukraine. The EO is located at https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/3.4.22-Russia -Ukraine-Executive- Order.pdf.
(a) Com
pliance with the economic sanctions imposed in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine is required, including with respect to, but not limited to, the federal EO identified in the EO and the sanctions identified on the U.S. Department of the Treasury website at https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/fi nancial-sanctions-
programs-and-and-country-information/ukraine-russia-related-sanctions. (b) Cont
ractor represents that it is not a target of economic sanctions. Should it be determined that Contractor is a target of economic sanctions or is conducting prohibited transactions with sanctioned individuals or entities, that shall be grounds for termination of this Contract.
b. Said G
rant Award Agreement is on file in the Victorville City Clerk’s Office and is hereby incorporated as part of this Contract by this reference.
Sect
ion 15. TIME OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of th
e essence in the performance of this Contract.
Sect
ion 16. INDEMNIF ICATION
a. Notwithstanding the limits of any insurance and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities, (hereinafter "Claims or Liabilities") that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising or alleged to arise out of or in connection with the performance of the Work, operations, or activities of Contractor, its agents, employees, Subcontractors, or invitees on the Project, or arising or alleged to arise from the acts or omissions of Contractor hereunder, or arising or alleged to arise from Contractor's performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Contract, but excluding such Claims or Liabilities or portion of such Claims or Liabilities arising or alleged to arise from the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers, or employees, and in connection therewith:
(1) Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said Claims or Liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith;
(2) Contractor will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers, or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising or alleged to arise out of or in connection with Contractor's (or its agents', employees', Subcontractors' or invitees') performance of or failure to perform such Work, operations or City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 12
activities hereunder; and Contractor agrees to save and hold the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees harmless therefrom; (3) In the event the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers, or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Contractor for such damages or other claims arising or alleged to arise out of or in connection with the performance of or failure to perform the Work, operation, or activities of Contractor hereunder, Contractor shall pay to the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents ,volunteers, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, volunteers, or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys' fees for counsel acceptable to City; (4) Contractor's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless as set out in this Section shall include any claims, liabilities, obligations, losses, demands, actions, penalties, suits, costs, expenses or damages or injury to persons or property arising or alleged to arise from, in connection with, as a consequence of, or pursuant to any state or federal law or regulation regarding hazardous substances, including but not limited to, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA"), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, the Hazardous Material Transportation Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the California Hazardous Substance Account Act, the California Hazardous Waste Control Law or the Porter- Cologne Water Quality Control Act, as any of those statutes may be amended from time to time. b. Cit
y will timely notify Contractor upon receipt of any third- party claim relating to the Contract, as required by Public Contract Code § 9201. The Contractor's indemnification and defense obligations pursuant to this Section shall survive the termination of this Contract. Contractor shall require the same indemnification from all Subcontractors.
Secti
on 17. REPORTS; BOOKS AND RECORDS; AUDIT
a. Upon request by the Project Manager Contractor shall prepare and submit reports concerning Contractor's performance of the Work required by this Contract. b. Contractor shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the work required by this Contract and enable the Project Manager to evaluate the cost and the performance of such Work.
c. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Project Manager shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records.
d. Records and supporting documents pertaining to the use of funds paid to Contractor hereunder and other financial records shall be retained by Contractor and made available to the Project Manager for purposes of performing an audit for a period of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Contract, or such later date as specified in Subsection e hereof. e. Contractor further agrees that the State Library, the Department of General Services, the State Auditor, or their designated representatives shall have the right to review, audit, inspect and copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of five (5) years after the final payment made under this Contract, or State Library Grant term end date, whichever is later, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated, or until completion of any action and resolution of all issues City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 13
which may arise as a result of any litigation, dispute, or audit, whichever is later. Contractor agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records.
Sectio
n 18. MODIFIC ATIONS AND AMENDMENTS
This Contract may be modified or amended only by written Change Orders as specified in the Contract Documents or a written instrument signed by both Parties.
Section 19. E
NTIRE AGREEMEN T
a. This Contract supersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous agreements, either oral or written, between the City and Contractor with respect to the subject matter of this Contract. b. The Contract Documents contain all of the covenants and agreements between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any Party, except those covenants and agreements in this Contract and the Contract Documents incorporated herein. c. No agreement, statement, or promise with respect to the subject matter of the Contract Documents, which is not contained in the Contract Documents, or in a valid modification or amendment to the Contract Documents, shall be valid or binding on either Party.
Section 20
. AMBIGUIT IES
This Cont
ract is in all respects intended by each Party hereto to be deemed and construed to have been jointly prepared by the Parties and the Parties hereby expressly agree that any uncertainty or ambiguity existing herein shall not be interpreted against either of them. Except as expressly limited by this paragraph, all of the applicable rules of interpretation of contract shall govern the interpretation of any uncertainty or ambiguity of this Contract. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties agree that Exhibit “A” is attached hereto for reference purposes, and to the extent there are any ambiguities, inconsistencies, or conflicts between the terms of this Contract and Exhibit “A”, the terms of this Contract shall control and nothing set forth in Exhibit “A” shall be deemed to supersede any of the provisions of this Contract.
Section 21
. NOTICES
a. Any notice to be provided pursuant to this Contract shall be in writing, and all such notices shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the Parties as follows:
To City:
To Contract
or:
_ __________
Joseph Slegers, Building Official_________________________________ Building Department_________________________________
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
Richard Boctor, President______________________________ ___________________Monet Construction, Inc.
7610 Day St.______________________________
Tujunga, CA 91042______________________________
______________________________
City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 14
To Surety: _______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
b. Notices, payments, and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the second (2nd) day after deposit in the United States mail. c. Either Party, or the surety, may change its address by giving notice in writing to all other parties listed above, and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to such new address.
Secti
on 22. NON-LIABI LITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount, which may become due to Contractor or to its successor(s), or for any breach of any obligation of the terms of this Contract.
Secti
on 23. REVIEW BY AT TORNEYS
Each Party hereto has consulted with and had its attorneys review this Contract and all related documents.
Secti
on 24. BONDS
Concurrently with the execution of this Contract by the Contractor, and before the commencement of any Work, Contractor shall furnish to the City a Faithful Performance Bond, and a Payment (Labor and Materials Bond) each in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract Price written on the forms included in the Contract Documents. The Faithful Performance Bond must remain in force until the later of: (1) the expiration of the one-year guarantee period; or (2) one year from the date of completion of any corrective Work performed during the one-year guarantee period. Such bonds must be issued by a responsible corporate Surety, licensed and authorized to issue such bonds in the State of California with an AM Best’s Rating of at least A: VII.
Secti
on 25. CARE OF WO RK
Contractor must adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Contract to furnish continuous protection to the Work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies, and other components to prevent losses or damages, and will be responsible for all damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Work by the City, except those losses or damages as may be caused by the City’s own negligence. The performance of the Work by Contractor or the payment of money by the City shall not relieve Contractor from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective Work (including the obligation to remedy any defective Work or materials during the one- year guarantee period after the City’s acceptance thereof) at no further cost to the City.
Secti
on 26. CAPTIONS A ND HEADINGS
The captions and headings contained in this Contract are provided for identification purposes only and shall not be interpreted to limit or define the content of the provisions described under the respective caption or heading.
Section 27. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
No portion of the Contract Documents may be used for any purpose other than construction of the Project, without prior written consent from City. Contractor is deemed to have conveyed the copyright in any designs, drawings, specifications, Shop Drawings, or other documents (in paper or electronic form) City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 15
developed by Contractor for the Project, and City will retain all rights to such works, including the right to possession.
Section 28. SUCCESSORS, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS
Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Contract shall be binding upon the successors, endorsees, assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of each of the Parties and, likewise, shall inure to the benefit of the successors, endorsees, assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of each of the Parties. This Contract may not be assigned or transferred by Contractor without the concurrence of the surety and express written consent of the City.
Section 29. GENDER; PLURAL
In this Contract, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the masculine, feminine and neuter genders and the singular and the plural shall include one another.
Section 30. SEVERABILIT Y
If any one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein is declared invalid, void, or unenforceable by a co urt of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Contract and shall not affect, impair, or invalidate any of the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein.
Section 31. GOVERNING LAW
The validity of this Contract and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the Parties under this Contract, shall be construed pursuant to and in accordance with California law.
Section 32. CUMULATIVE REM EDIES
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Contract, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default of any other default by the other Party.
Section 33. VENUE
All proceedings involving disputes over the terms, provisions, covenants, or conditions contained in this Contract and all proceedings involving any enforcement action related to this Contract shall be initiated and conducted in the applicable court or forum in San Bernardino County, California.
Section 34. EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTRACT
This Contract shall not be binding upon the City until signed by the authorized representative(s) of Contractor, approved by the City’s Risk Manager, and executed by the authorized City personnel or the Mayor.
Section
35. REPRESENTATI ONS OF PARTIES AND PERSONS EXECUTING CONTRACT Each of t
he Parties to this Contract hereby represents that all necessary and appropriate actions of their governing bodies have been taken to make this Contract a binding obligation of each of the Parties hereto. The persons executing this Contract warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of and bind the Parties each purports to represent.
City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 16
Section 36. WAIVER
No delay
or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non- defaulting Party on any default under this Contract shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. A Party's consent to or approval of any act by the other Party requiring the Party's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other Party's consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Contract.
Secti
on 37. INDEPENDENT CO NTRACTOR STATUS; NOT AGENT OF THE CITY a. The Part
ies hereto acknowledge and agree that Contractor is and at all times shall remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. All persons working for or under the direction of the Contractor are the Contractor's employees, agents, or subcontractors, and they shall not be deemed agents, servants, or employees of the City. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. The pers
onnel performing work or services under this Contract on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents, except as may otherwise be set forth herein.
Secti
on 38. COUNTERPAR TS
This Contract may be executed by the Parties in counterparts, and when executed by each of the Parties, each counterpart shall be deemed to be a part of this Contract.
Secti
on 39. PROVISION S REQUIRED BY LAW DEEMED INSERTED
Each and ev
ery provision of law and clause required by Law to be inserted in this Contract shall be deemed to be inserted herein and the Contract shall be read and enforced as though it were included herein, and if through mistake or otherwise any such provision is not inserted, or is not currently inserted, then upon application of either Party the Contract shall forthwith be physically amended to make such insertion or correction.
Secti
on 40. ATTORNEY' S FEES
If ei
ther Party commences an action against the other Party, either legal, administrative, or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Contract, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all other costs of such action.
Secti
on 41. CONFLI CTS OF INTEREST
Contr
actor covenants that it does not have any interest, nor shall it acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of Contractor’s Work under this Contract. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of Work under this Contract, no officer, employee, or agent of Contractor having such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Contractor shall avoid the appearance of having any interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Work pursuant to this Contract. Contractor further agrees to complete any statements City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 17
of economic interest (FPPC Form 700) if required by either City ordinance or State law and further certifies that it does not now have nor shall it acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of the work and services under this Agreement and does not know of any fact which constitutes a violation of any conflict of interest law, including Section 81000 et seq. or Section 1090 et seq. of the California Government Code. In the event the City determines that Contractor must disclose its financial interests by completing and filing a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, Contractor shall file such Form 700 with the City Clerk’s Office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk. Acquisition or maintenance of a confl icting interest by Contractor may result in termination of this Contract by the City.
Secti
on 42. ASSIGNMENT OF UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICE CLAIMS
In ac
cordance with California Public Contract Code Section 7103.5, the Contractor and any Subcontractors offer and agree to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action the Contractor or any Subcontractors may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.
Section 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services or materials pursuant to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Contractor, without further acknowledgement by the Parties. (END OF T
HIS PAGE – SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)
City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 18
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed as of the dates written below.
THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
By: By: Contractor Authorized Officer(s)__
Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor
_______________________________
Name
_______________________________
Title
Dated: Dated: ____________________________
ATTEST
By:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Dated:
APPROVED AS TO STANDARD FORM
By:
Andre de Bortnowsky, City Attorney
Dated:
THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE
By:
Sandra Bostick, Risk Manager
Dated:
Richard Boctor
President
EX
HIBIT A
C
ONTRACTOR'S BID PROPOSAL
S
ee Attachment
City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 NEW LIBRARY
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P a g e | 20
EXHIBIT A, CONTRACTOR'S BID PROPOSAL, PROJECT JM24-051
21/City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 New Library Renovation and Expansion EXHIBIT A, CONTRACTOR'S BID PROPOSAL, PROJECT JM24-051
22/City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 New Library Renovation and Expansion EXHIBIT A, CONTRACTOR'S BID PROPOSAL, PROJECT JM24-051
23/City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 New Library Renovation and Expansion EXHIBIT A, CONTRACTOR'S BID PROPOSAL, PROJECT JM24-051
24/City of Victorville, Project JM24-051 New Library Renovation and Expansion Item Number: 3
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 05, 2024
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Payroll Warrant List
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 3C for Payroll Period September 15, 2023, through September 29, 2023, in the amount of $1,943,906.68 covering Check Nos. 20001 through 20500* and 20510 through 20542, including Vendor checks, per adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 (period covering July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024).
Please note that the reporting of Payroll Demand Schedule 3C was postponed due to technical challenges during the processing of this pay period. Check numbers referenced above were processed outside of the Munis payroll system and subsequently entered into Munis where the system issued different check numbers. System check numbers are refenced on Attachment A, along with the manual check numbers. *Missing check numbers 20501 through 20509 were voided due to printing issue.
Fiscal Impact:
A total fiscal impact of $1,943,906.68 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the payments by check numbers.
Discussion:
I hereby certify that the claims or demands covered by the attached list of warrants have been audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and that said claims or demands are accurate and the funds are available for payment thereof.
Attachments: A. Payroll Report PPE 092923
Attachment A
Payroll Report PPE 092923
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 1 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total Net
20001 529 3107 10/02/2023 $8,902.95
20002 528 3371 10/02/2023 $980.31
20003 530 3418 10/02/2023 $12,705.38
20004 4 3608 10/05/2023 $3,019.03
20005 7 3243 10/05/2023 $4,141.81
20006 15 3229 10/05/2023 $4,453.64
20007 16 3283 10/05/2023 $2,641.22
20008 17 1064 10/05/2023 $7,573.66
20009 20 3727 10/05/2023 $2,069.17
20010 6 3758 10/05/2023 $3,310.52
20011 5 1099 10/05/2023 $846.20
20012 11 3297 10/05/2023 $754.67
20013 12 3466 10/05/2023 $783.95
20014 13 3551 10/05/2023 $674.28
20015 14 3458 10/05/2023 $545.04
20016 23 3764 10/05/2023 $2,402.98
20017 9 3142 10/05/2023 $1,761.64
20018 10 3640 10/05/2023 $1,843.58
20019 18 3809 10/05/2023 $1,748.16
20020 19 3467 10/05/2023 $2,067.42
20021 22 2395 10/05/2023 $3,645.44
20022 21 1706 10/05/2023 $4,579.60
20022 21 1706 10/05/2023 ($4,579.60)
20023 8 2115 10/05/2023 $5,494.33
20024 27 3625 10/05/2023 $1,496.30
20025 31 1748 10/05/2023 $2,674.67
20026 33 3019 10/05/2023 $4,604.63
20027 34 3638 10/05/2023 $3,254.83
20028 35 3561 10/05/2023 $2,501.81
20029 37 3616 10/05/2023 $2,873.99
20030 38 3630 10/05/2023 $1,873.87
20031 40 2682 10/05/2023 $2,259.56
20032 43 3750 10/05/2023 $1,966.32
20033 44 2594 10/05/2023 $3,081.40
20034 49 1973 10/05/2023 $3,389.29
20035 50 2019 10/05/2023 $2,518.98
20036 51 3753 10/05/2023 $2,314.27
20037 55 3744 10/05/2023 $1,873.04
Manual Check #
Checks
Payroll Period Beginning: September 15, 2023 through September 29, 2023 City Council Payroll Report
City of Victorville
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 2 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20038 59 1635 10/05/2023 $4,107.09
20039 61 3327 10/05/2023 $2,131.66
20040 62 3752 10/05/2023 $1,966.18
20041 67 2619 10/05/2023 $2,409.20
20042 69 2491 10/05/2023 $2,325.56
20043 70 2235 10/05/2023 $3,037.49
20044 71 2300 10/05/2023 $3,450.47
20045 39 3527 10/05/2023 $1,741.54
20046 48 3697 10/05/2023 $4,986.66
20047 53 2102 10/05/2023 $3,038.70
20048 54 2233 10/05/2023 $2,603.79
20049 60 3653 10/05/2023 $2,037.81
20050 72 3754 10/05/2023 $2,435.15
20051 73 2032 10/05/2023 $3,426.01
20052 75 3499 10/05/2023 $2,072.41
20053 46 3695 10/05/2023 $2,107.04
20054 63 3819 10/05/2023 $2,536.34
20055 64 3242 10/05/2023 $2,992.68
20056 66 3573 10/05/2023 $1,731.74
20057 25 3700 10/05/2023 $1,859.82
20058 26 3747 10/05/2023 $1,930.62
20059 28 2624 10/05/2023 $3,197.64
20060 29 3043 10/05/2023 $2,082.75
20061 32 3817 10/05/2023 $1,719.23
20062 36 1903 10/05/2023 $1,789.82
20063 41 2627 10/05/2023 $2,017.73
20064 42 2366 10/05/2023 $1,859.61
20065 45 3521 10/05/2023 $2,412.09
20066 47 2093 10/05/2023 $1,496.80
20067 56 2606 10/05/2023 $2,313.53
20068 57 3660 10/05/2023 $1,687.52
20069 58 3046 10/05/2023 $2,092.61
20070 65 2618 10/05/2023 $1,996.75
20071 68 2603 10/05/2023 $1,829.14
20072 74 3045 10/05/2023 $2,715.11
20073 76 3755 10/05/2023 $1,929.39
20074 52 3494 10/05/2023 $2,914.57
20075 280 3624 10/05/2023 $2,130.20
20076 77 3362 10/05/2023 $2,194.01
20077 78 2297 10/05/2023 $2,056.26
20078 79 2232 10/05/2023 $2,960.47
20079 80 1957 10/05/2023 $2,633.22
20080 81 3290 10/05/2023 $2,167.66
20081 505 3085 10/05/2023 $2,257.51
20082 82 3246 10/05/2023 $3,199.13
20083 83 2042 10/05/2023 $4,233.99
20084 84 3714 10/05/2023 $1,722.40
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 3 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20085 85 3742 10/05/2023 $1,721.36
20086 86 2323 10/05/2023 $3,390.87
20087 87 1767 10/05/2023 $2,818.53
20088 88 3508 10/05/2023 $2,250.26
20089 89 3740 10/05/2023 $1,801.62
20090 90 2225 10/05/2023 $4,181.26
20091 91 3544 10/05/2023 $1,761.68
20092 92 3221 10/05/2023 $2,791.64
20093 93 3627 10/05/2023 $2,890.80
20094 94 3757 10/05/2023 $3,376.25
20095 95 1533 10/05/2023 $2,473.29
20096 96 2833 10/05/2023 $2,233.01
20097 97 2211 10/05/2023 $5,396.36
20098 101 3703 10/05/2023 $2,040.52
20099 102 2254 10/05/2023 $3,019.37
20100 103 3618 10/05/2023 $2,107.13
20101 106 3354 10/05/2023 $3,567.90
20102 110 3400 10/05/2023 $2,431.21
20103 114 3702 10/05/2023 $1,911.27
20104 116 3089 10/05/2023 $3,002.71
20105 117 3641 10/05/2023 $1,707.78
20106 120 3634 10/05/2023 $2,490.45
20107 125 2249 10/05/2023 $5,260.69
20108 126 3650 10/05/2023 $1,636.14
20109 127 3393 10/05/2023 $1,788.06
20110 115 2742 10/05/2023 $2,840.24
20111 98 3497 10/05/2023 $1,565.69
20112 99 1426 10/05/2023 $1,110.30
20113 100 3105 10/05/2023 $1,812.32
20114 104 3482 10/05/2023 $1,790.48
20115 105 3724 10/05/2023 $1,021.85
20116 107 3011 10/05/2023 $1,738.86
20117 108 3295 10/05/2023 $1,776.40
20118 109 3184 10/05/2023 $3,508.10
20119 111 3547 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20120 112 3673 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20121 113 3288 10/05/2023 $1,687.44
20122 118 2379 10/05/2023 $2,186.65
20123 119 3672 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20124 121 2711 10/05/2023 $1,723.87
20125 122 3639 10/05/2023 $1,578.83
20126 124 3190 10/05/2023 $2,711.44
20127 128 3250 10/05/2023 $1,709.28
20128 129 3491 10/05/2023 $1,140.79
20128 129 3491 10/05/2023 ($1,140.79)
20129 130 3548 10/05/2023 $1,144.34
20130 131 3511 10/05/2023 $2,044.72
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 4 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20131 123 3586 10/05/2023 $1,850.61
20132 132 3396 10/05/2023 $2,042.98
20133 134 3541 10/05/2023 $2,590.98
20134 135 2499 10/05/2023 $3,227.79
20135 136 3379 10/05/2023 $2,274.66
20136 142 3636 10/05/2023 $2,386.72
20137 144 3490 10/05/2023 $2,250.79
20138 147 3353 10/05/2023 $2,566.65
20139 154 3692 10/05/2023 $2,376.58
20140 155 3147 10/05/2023 $2,844.28
20141 157 3148 10/05/2023 $3,013.46
20142 137 3694 10/05/2023 $2,120.17
20143 140 3474 10/05/2023 $2,087.85
20144 145 3475 10/05/2023 $2,213.92
20145 149 3542 10/05/2023 $1,990.71
20146 151 1955 10/05/2023 $2,547.34
20147 159 3195 10/05/2023 $1,717.54
20148 133 3663 10/05/2023 $1,627.19
20149 138 3737 10/05/2023 $2,055.26
20150 143 2679 10/05/2023 $2,864.31
20151 148 3735 10/05/2023 $3,577.60
20152 150 3731 10/05/2023 $2,433.55
20153 152 1632 10/05/2023 $2,161.27
20154 153 3736 10/05/2023 $2,456.13
20155 156 3732 10/05/2023 $2,370.19
20156 161 3602 10/05/2023 $2,360.31
20157 141 2515 10/05/2023 $2,876.45
20158 146 2181 10/05/2023 $2,372.23
20159 158 3808 10/05/2023 $2,655.35
20160 162 3112 10/05/2023 $1,940.25
20161 139 2105 10/05/2023 $4,912.96
20162 168 2377 10/05/2023 $2,627.35
20163 169 1079 10/05/2023 $2,623.44
20164 176 3068 10/05/2023 $2,093.45
20165 178 3129 10/05/2023 $3,497.84
20166 180 1998 10/05/2023 $2,906.51
20166 180 1998 10/05/2023 ($2,906.51)
20167 191 1776 10/05/2023 $3,200.54
20168 194 3749 10/05/2023 $1,804.08
20169 173 3510 10/05/2023 $1,811.93
20170 177 3633 10/05/2023 $2,555.75
20171 181 2376 10/05/2023 $4,245.59
20172 184 3303 10/05/2023 $3,749.93
20173 198 1503 10/05/2023 $3,132.46
20174 196 2522 10/05/2023 $1,215.08
20175 163 1970 10/05/2023 $2,269.38
20176 164 1520 10/05/2023 $2,096.46
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 5 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20177 167 2540 10/05/2023 $3,422.87
20178 172 2312 10/05/2023 $2,432.06
20179 182 2111 10/05/2023 $2,730.35
20180 188 3285 10/05/2023 $2,664.03
20181 189 1529 10/05/2023 $1,946.06
20182 190 3346 10/05/2023 $2,130.21
20183 192 3192 10/05/2023 $2,085.35
20184 195 2798 10/05/2023 $2,190.55
20185 197 3265 10/05/2023 $2,174.18
20186 175 3628 10/05/2023 $2,289.64
20187 170 2705 10/05/2023 $3,496.98
20188 179 3816 10/05/2023 $3,030.79
20189 185 3802 10/05/2023 $2,613.50
20190 186 3558 10/05/2023 $2,711.14
20191 187 1655 10/05/2023 $2,543.67
20192 165 2605 10/05/2023 $2,384.89
20193 166 3505 10/05/2023 $4,981.01
20194 171 2259 10/05/2023 $1,240.36
20195 174 3637 10/05/2023 $2,371.17
20196 183 3543 10/05/2023 $1,985.14
20197 193 2655 10/05/2023 $1,546.31
20198 285 3536 10/05/2023 $2,665.63
20199 289 3804 10/05/2023 $2,464.43
20200 160 3626 10/05/2023 $2,427.99
20201 270 3688 10/05/2023 $1,716.24
20202 291 3532 10/05/2023 $1,937.43
20203 313 3671 10/05/2023 $1,707.17
20204 213 2034 10/05/2023 $2,149.64
20205 264 3277 10/05/2023 $1,904.24
20206 206 3273 10/05/2023 $1,903.28
20207 208 1497 10/05/2023 $2,593.02
20208 209 3537 10/05/2023 $2,546.84
20209 215 3380 10/05/2023 $2,439.74
20210 222 2228 10/05/2023 $2,327.40
20211 225 3101 10/05/2023 $2,687.61
20212 238 3788 10/05/2023 $1,872.68
20213 240 3560 10/05/2023 $1,772.55
20214 241 3509 10/05/2023 $2,145.54
20215 252 3707 10/05/2023 $1,802.48
20216 272 1137 10/05/2023 $1,725.23
20217 278 3733 10/05/2023 $1,565.84
20218 282 3099 10/05/2023 $2,494.65
20219 294 3100 10/05/2023 $2,726.89
20220 316 2552 10/05/2023 $2,119.12
20221 200 3299 10/05/2023 $1,804.11
20222 204 3729 10/05/2023 $1,586.21
20223 205 2343 10/05/2023 $1,292.11
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 6 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20224 216 3191 10/05/2023 $2,213.93
20225 217 3792 10/05/2023 $740.39
20226 218 3496 10/05/2023 $855.98
20227 227 3611 10/05/2023 $1,253.83
20228 230 3580 10/05/2023 $1,552.56
20229 232 3270 10/05/2023 $1,902.58
20230 234 3263 10/05/2023 $1,863.45
20231 235 3622 10/05/2023 $1,099.30
20232 236 3795 10/05/2023 $1,109.71
20233 243 3257 10/05/2023 $1,949.35
20234 247 3479 10/05/2023 $1,689.63
20235 248 3689 10/05/2023 $1,758.87
20236 251 3791 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20237 253 3572 10/05/2023 $1,267.52
20238 257 3387 10/05/2023 $1,176.91
20239 262 1282 10/05/2023 $2,341.17
20240 268 3481 10/05/2023 $1,813.50
20241 273 3793 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20242 275 3687 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20243 284 1287 10/05/2023 $2,539.25
20244 292 3798 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20245 293 3258 10/05/2023 $1,840.97
20246 295 3259 10/05/2023 $1,520.42
20247 296 3796 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20248 299 3507 10/05/2023 $2,207.22
20249 301 3790 10/05/2023 $1,247.64
20250 304 1959 10/05/2023 $3,248.06
20251 307 3794 10/05/2023 $1,165.06
20252 311 3725 10/05/2023 $987.94
20253 223 3726 10/05/2023 $1,890.48
20254 250 3296 10/05/2023 $2,276.14
20255 220 1750 10/05/2023 $2,324.47
20256 246 1865 10/05/2023 $2,101.86
20257 245 3149 10/05/2023 $2,371.10
20258 249 1723 10/05/2023 $1,784.88
20259 256 2118 10/05/2023 $1,064.18
20260 258 3330 10/05/2023 $1,716.25
20261 267 1449 10/05/2023 $2,998.61
20262 276 3130 10/05/2023 $1,933.69
20263 279 3361 10/05/2023 $2,286.60
20264 283 2696 10/05/2023 $1,732.08
20265 287 1254 10/05/2023 $2,050.68
20266 290 2368 10/05/2023 $2,131.74
20267 298 1338 10/05/2023 $3,707.96
20268 315 3338 10/05/2023 $1,604.62
20269 210 2192 10/05/2023 $2,019.62
20270 263 3610 10/05/2023 $1,688.27
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 7 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20271 281 3139 10/05/2023 $1,567.99
20272 310 3279 10/05/2023 $1,952.86
20273 314 2732 10/05/2023 $1,874.85
20274 211 3513 10/05/2023 $2,166.31
20275 212 3685 10/05/2023 $1,646.37
20276 219 3051 10/05/2023 $1,865.09
20277 203 3185 10/05/2023 $2,358.28
20278 269 2677 10/05/2023 $5,147.43
20279 201 3113 10/05/2023 $2,304.24
20280 271 3341 10/05/2023 $1,862.47
20281 302 1049 10/05/2023 $2,342.47
20282 305 3004 10/05/2023 $2,025.92
20283 274 2383 10/05/2023 $2,046.53
20284 303 1506 10/05/2023 $1,957.12
20285 312 2460 10/05/2023 $1,932.75
20286 226 3335 10/05/2023 $2,163.54
20287 244 1121 10/05/2023 $2,414.57
20288 261 1612 10/05/2023 $1,739.74
20289 255 1513 10/05/2023 $1,990.95
20290 277 2489 10/05/2023 $1,710.43
20291 221 2770 10/05/2023 $1,916.43
20292 199 2505 10/05/2023 $2,834.43
20293 207 3121 10/05/2023 $1,883.84
20294 254 2531 10/05/2023 $2,700.65
20295 228 1249 10/05/2023 $2,054.48
20296 229 3284 10/05/2023 $1,966.61
20297 231 3621 10/05/2023 $1,676.32
20298 233 2248 10/05/2023 $1,993.17
20299 237 1588 10/05/2023 $2,184.32
20300 242 3226 10/05/2023 $1,699.63
20301 259 2681 10/05/2023 $3,682.39
20302 260 2119 10/05/2023 $1,892.14
20303 265 3287 10/05/2023 $1,942.15
20304 266 3037 10/05/2023 $1,677.11
20305 286 3722 10/05/2023 $1,854.24
20306 297 3344 10/05/2023 $1,957.09
20307 300 2229 10/05/2023 $1,763.00
20308 306 1893 10/05/2023 $2,048.48
20309 308 1581 10/05/2023 $2,517.34
20310 309 1932 10/05/2023 $1,853.95
20311 202 1007 10/05/2023 $3,110.70
20312 214 2275 10/05/2023 $2,841.96
20313 239 2189 10/05/2023 $2,540.67
20314 224 3748 10/05/2023 $2,206.28
20315 288 3187 10/05/2023 $1,851.45
20316 318 2279 10/05/2023 $2,466.30
20317 317 2476 10/05/2023 $3,362.14
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 8 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20318 319 3515 10/05/2023 $5,135.75
20319 320 3092 10/05/2023 $2,546.41
20320 321 3138 10/05/2023 $3,057.48
20321 322 3146 10/05/2023 $2,780.21
20322 323 2590 10/05/2023 $2,233.25
20323 326 2669 10/05/2023 $3,178.05
20324 337 3038 10/05/2023 $2,770.24
20325 361 3238 10/05/2023 $4,515.58
20326 375 2339 10/05/2023 $2,267.78
20327 378 3743 10/05/2023 $1,790.36
20328 329 2638 10/05/2023 $2,906.07
20329 336 2626 10/05/2023 $1,691.86
20330 341 3110 10/05/2023 $2,403.05
20331 343 2612 10/05/2023 $2,409.53
20332 345 2642 10/05/2023 $2,192.35
20333 346 3705 10/05/2023 $2,065.70
20334 353 2630 10/05/2023 $2,580.89
20335 358 2610 10/05/2023 $2,489.29
20336 360 1389 10/05/2023 $2,064.18
20337 364 2646 10/05/2023 $2,210.82
20338 370 3322 10/05/2023 $2,236.92
20339 373 1931 10/05/2023 $2,301.23
20340 371 3629 10/05/2023 $2,519.93
20341 379 3215 10/05/2023 $2,549.70
20342 372 3230 10/05/2023 $3,237.35
20343 325 3709 10/05/2023 $2,653.97
20344 351 2628 10/05/2023 $2,700.20
20345 354 3182 10/05/2023 $2,598.10
20346 327 2623 10/05/2023 $2,003.87
20347 332 2671 10/05/2023 $3,014.59
20348 335 3461 10/05/2023 $2,185.94
20349 355 2599 10/05/2023 $2,168.34
20350 356 2683 10/05/2023 $2,129.49
20351 362 3264 10/05/2023 $1,982.13
20352 365 3617 10/05/2023 $1,631.13
20353 324 2748 10/05/2023 $2,057.79
20354 328 2637 10/05/2023 $2,395.70
20355 331 3109 10/05/2023 $2,657.12
20356 333 2593 10/05/2023 $2,607.60
20357 334 3328 10/05/2023 $2,384.70
20358 338 3052 10/05/2023 $2,011.97
20359 339 2290 10/05/2023 $2,016.62
20360 340 3716 10/05/2023 $1,666.76
20361 342 2641 10/05/2023 $1,978.30
20362 344 3698 10/05/2023 $1,330.84
20363 347 3331 10/05/2023 $1,794.66
20364 349 3231 10/05/2023 $2,377.70
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 9 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20365 350 3228 10/05/2023 $2,524.05
20366 352 3301 10/05/2023 $1,705.66
20367 357 2753 10/05/2023 $2,327.17
20368 359 3323 10/05/2023 $1,865.86
20369 363 2808 10/05/2023 $1,953.77
20370 367 2524 10/05/2023 $2,695.82
20371 368 2686 10/05/2023 $1,997.84
20372 369 2193 10/05/2023 $2,244.39
20373 374 2038 10/05/2023 $1,747.83
20374 377 3240 10/05/2023 $2,328.97
20375 380 3140 10/05/2023 $2,025.18
20376 381 3035 10/05/2023 $2,190.69
20377 330 3803 10/05/2023 $1,946.52
20378 366 2600 10/05/2023 $2,547.89
20379 376 2678 10/05/2023 $3,738.77
20380 348 2674 10/05/2023 $2,706.19
20381 407 3789 10/05/2023 $4,243.33
20382 382 3651 10/05/2023 $2,176.54
20383 388 3384 10/05/2023 $1,141.87
20384 389 3386 10/05/2023 $1,954.27
20385 390 2488 10/05/2023 $1,030.81
20386 396 3070 10/05/2023 $2,264.22
20387 397 3657 10/05/2023 $726.28
20388 401 3674 10/05/2023 $950.56
20389 404 3655 10/05/2023 $950.56
20390 405 3813 10/05/2023 $946.29
20391 406 3656 10/05/2023 $896.29
20392 408 2478 10/05/2023 $996.29
20393 411 3471 10/05/2023 $1,097.77
20394 412 3531 10/05/2023 $4,146.27
20395 413 3814 10/05/2023 $1,007.37
20396 414 3587 10/05/2023 $359.90
20397 416 3029 10/05/2023 $1,611.96
20398 417 3812 10/05/2023 $946.29
20399 419 3609 10/05/2023 $1,116.62
20400 422 3691 10/05/2023 $946.29
20401 383 3769 10/05/2023 $108.35
20402 385 3645 10/05/2023 $771.07
20403 386 3503 10/05/2023 $2,701.31
20404 387 3579 10/05/2023 $368.77
20405 391 3120 10/05/2023 $1,006.54
20406 392 3806 10/05/2023 $766.76
20407 429 3502 10/05/2023 $2,249.73
20408 393 3768 10/05/2023 $61.91
20409 394 3582 10/05/2023 $1,024.73
20410 395 3252 10/05/2023 $2,665.61
20411 398 3767 10/05/2023 $464.36
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 10 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20412 399 1866 10/05/2023 $1,732.91
20413 400 3664 10/05/2023 $340.53
20414 402 3766 10/05/2023 $441.14
20415 403 3717 10/05/2023 $139.31
20416 409 3648 10/05/2023 $123.83
20417 410 3779 10/05/2023 $325.05
20418 415 3669 10/05/2023 $216.40
20419 418 3326 10/05/2023 $3,263.43
20420 420 3770 10/05/2023 $108.35
20421 421 3492 10/05/2023 $473.72
20422 423 3776 10/05/2023 $224.44
20423 425 3576 10/05/2023 $1,116.62
20424 426 3647 10/05/2023 $605.12
20425 427 3566 10/05/2023 $527.16
20426 428 3777 10/05/2023 $38.70
20427 424 3810 10/05/2023 $950.56
20428 384 1853 10/05/2023 $2,895.78
20429 431 2006 10/05/2023 $3,224.40
20430 430 3368 10/05/2023 $1,802.86
20431 432 3761 10/05/2023 $2,866.72
20432 433 2684 10/05/2023 $381.24
20432 433 2684 10/05/2023 ($381.24)
20433 434 3079 10/05/2023 $1,904.37
20434 453 3512 10/05/2023 $2,379.46
20435 435 1966 10/05/2023 $2,204.46
20436 436 3388 10/05/2023 $2,008.56
20437 437 2355 10/05/2023 $2,205.29
20438 438 3696 10/05/2023 $2,641.47
20439 439 3500 10/05/2023 $2,698.61
20440 440 3620 10/05/2023 $1,863.54
20441 441 3654 10/05/2023 $1,619.50
20442 442 2039 10/05/2023 $1,903.03
20443 443 3281 10/05/2023 $1,652.38
20444 444 3550 10/05/2023 $2,634.53
20445 445 2629 10/05/2023 $2,103.26
20446 446 3348 10/05/2023 $1,820.68
20447 447 3807 10/05/2023 $1,892.69
20448 448 3081 10/05/2023 $1,834.60
20449 449 3523 10/05/2023 $4,184.88
20450 450 3271 10/05/2023 $1,806.19
20451 451 3017 10/05/2023 $4,939.46
20452 452 3706 10/05/2023 $1,451.74
20453 454 2027 10/05/2023 $1,182.73
20454 455 2330 10/05/2023 $2,978.73
20455 456 2795 10/05/2023 $686.54
20456 457 3437 10/05/2023 $4,027.00
20457 458 3652 10/05/2023 $2,244.12
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 11 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20458 460 3439 10/05/2023 $2,524.77
20459 461 3440 10/05/2023 $4,454.19
20460 462 3441 10/05/2023 $2,718.19
20461 463 3473 10/05/2023 $3,179.15
20462 464 3406 10/05/2023 $2,792.14
20463 465 3422 10/05/2023 $4,758.43
20464 466 3442 10/05/2023 $3,572.74
20465 467 3433 10/05/2023 $4,275.63
20466 468 3469 10/05/2023 $3,274.24
20467 469 3424 10/05/2023 $5,222.13
20468 470 3414 10/05/2023 $3,917.72
20469 471 3704 10/05/2023 $3,356.49
20470 472 3734 10/05/2023 $4,560.65
20471 473 3799 10/05/2023 $1,917.45
20472 474 3443 10/05/2023 $1,992.68
20473 475 3600 10/05/2023 $2,059.41
20474 476 3711 10/05/2023 $6,407.25
20475 477 3715 10/05/2023 $3,889.06
20476 478 3444 10/05/2023 $4,246.49
20477 479 3583 10/05/2023 $4,896.18
20478 480 3594 10/05/2023 $3,955.40
20479 481 1718 10/05/2023 $4,079.19
20480 482 3409 10/05/2023 $4,360.26
20481 484 3642 10/05/2023 $4,488.72
20482 485 3584 10/05/2023 $5,452.58
20483 486 3746 10/05/2023 $2,027.01
20484 487 3538 10/05/2023 $2,057.63
20485 488 3410 10/05/2023 $5,338.53
20486 489 3447 10/05/2023 $4,963.55
20487 490 3427 10/05/2023 $3,871.09
20488 491 3411 10/05/2023 $8,155.18
20489 492 3448 10/05/2023 $3,460.14
20490 493 3719 10/05/2023 $1,622.79
20491 494 3518 10/05/2023 $1,966.09
20492 495 3449 10/05/2023 $4,365.97
20493 496 3428 10/05/2023 $4,376.92
20494 497 3429 10/05/2023 $4,589.57
20495 498 3455 10/05/2023 $4,317.87
20496 500 3712 10/05/2023 $5,934.91
20497 501 3595 10/05/2023 $3,783.59
20498 502 3430 10/05/2023 $4,387.65
20499 503 3452 10/05/2023 $2,268.93
20500 504 3417 10/05/2023 $2,661.49
20510 507 3419 10/05/2023 $3,925.43
20511 508 3720 10/05/2023 $2,690.79
20512 509 3524 10/05/2023 $2,390.23
20513 510 3412 10/05/2023 $4,197.36
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 12 of 14 02/12/2024 System Check # Employee ID Check Date Total NetManual Check # 20514 512 3420 10/05/2023 $1,926.23
20515 513 3378 10/05/2023 $1,246.36
20516 515 3800 10/05/2023 $3,599.37
20517 516 3432 10/05/2023 $4,054.37
20518 517 3408 10/05/2023 $8,669.71
20519 518 3456 10/05/2023 $1,879.99
20520 520 3591 10/05/2023 $1,318.94
20521 521 3392 10/05/2023 $4,060.24
20521 521 3392 10/05/2023 ($4,060.24)
20522 24 2210 10/05/2023 $3,869.63
20523 522 3434 10/05/2023 $2,308.60
20524 459 3421 10/05/2023 $5,413.37
20525 483 3426 10/05/2023 $3,975.23
20526 499 3451 10/05/2023 $2,494.80
20527 506 3431 10/05/2023 $2,798.33
20528 511 3805 10/05/2023 $2,130.09
20529 514 3435 10/05/2023 $2,656.05
20530 519 3763 10/05/2023 $2,925.25
20531 30 3403 10/05/2023 $1,978.89
20532 531 3238 10/10/2023 $8,882.20
20533 21 1706 10/05/2023 $4,579.60
20534 180 1998 10/05/2023 $2,906.51
20535 523 240 10/05/2023 $5.00
20536 524 1182 10/05/2023 $250.00
20536 524 1182 10/05/2023 ($250.00)
20537 20537 2684 10/05/2023 $1,624.73
20538 20538 3491 10/05/2023 $1,144.34
20539 524 1182 10/05/2023 $250.00
20540 525 13491 10/05/2023 $422.31
20541 526 18154 10/05/2023 $175.00
20542 527 20821 10/05/2023 $423.00
Checks Total 1,258,893.86
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 13 of 14 02/12/2024 Check Date Total Gross
10/6/2023 $149,205.26
12/8/2023 $57,558.48
10/10/2023 $40,923.29
12/11/2023 $14,991.25
10/10/2023 $4,143.59
10/6/2023 $461.77
10/10/2023 $7,220.60
10/11/2023 $74,061.81
10/11/2023 $278.72
10/16/2023 $333,228.05
VV Firefighter's Union 10/11/2023 $2,940.00
Electronic Vendor Payments Total 685,012.82
IRS
State Taxes
State Taxes
Electronic Vendor Payments
Vendor
IRS
Deferred Comp (457)
Deferred Comp (401a)
PERS
CASDU
Deferred Comp (457)
Deferred Comp (457)
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 14 of 14 02/12/2024 Item Number: 4
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 5, 2024
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Payroll Warrant List
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 6B for Payroll Period December 8, 2023, through December 22, 2023, in the amount of $2,051,272.09 covering Check Nos. 33815 through 33831, including Vendor checks.
Please note employee Check No. 33820 has a live Check and an EFT Advice. Also included are Advice Nos. 308303 through 308833, per adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 (period covering July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024).
Fiscal Impact:
A total fiscal impact of $2,051,272.09 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the payments by check numbers.
Discussion:
I hereby certify that the claims or demands covered by the attached list of warrants have been audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and that said claims or demands are accurate and the funds are available for payment thereof.
Attachments: A. Payroll Report PPE 122223
Attachment A
Payroll Report PPE 122223
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 1 of 15 01/30/2024 Total Net
$545.82
$3,225.24
$364.20
$364.20
$364.20
$2,365.39
$2,363.08
$2,317.53
$386.96
$23.22
$2,959.33
$50.00
$250.00
$100.00
$1,103.87
$422.31
$379.17
17,584.52
Checks
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period Beginning: December 08, 2023 through December 22, 2023 Check Number Employee ID Check Date
33815 3466 12/29/2023
33816 3845 12/29/2023
33817 3310 12/29/2023
33818 3614 12/29/2023
33819 3556 12/29/2023
33820 2705 12/29/2023
33821 2626 12/29/2023
33822 3323 12/29/2023
33823 3664 12/29/2023
33824 3776 12/29/2023
33825 3435 12/29/2023
33826 787 12/29/2023
33827 1182 12/29/2023
33828 1182 12/29/2023
33829 7912 12/29/2023
Checks Total
33830 13491 12/29/2023
33831 3229 12/29/2023
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 2 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
33820 2705 12/29/2023 $2,000.00
308303 3434 12/15/2023 $4,266.01
308304 3826 12/22/2023 $2,694.37
308305 3608 12/29/2023 $3,480.32
308306 1099 12/29/2023 $530.43
308307 3758 12/29/2023 $3,518.09
308308 3243 12/29/2023 $4,022.82
308309 2115 12/29/2023 $5,658.99
308310 3142 12/29/2023 $1,915.90
308311 3640 12/29/2023 $1,834.12
308312 3527 12/29/2023 $2,102.17
308313 3297 12/29/2023 $504.28
308314 3835 12/29/2023 $899.94
308315 3551 12/29/2023 $501.97
308316 3458 12/29/2023 $501.97
308317 3229 12/29/2023 $5,257.04
308318 1064 12/29/2023 $7,118.25
308319 3809 12/29/2023 $1,601.36
308320 3467 12/29/2023 $2,337.56
308321 3727 12/29/2023 $2,078.91
308322 3843 12/29/2023 $2,078.90
308323 3842 12/29/2023 $694.64
308324 1706 12/29/2023 $4,812.48
308325 2395 12/29/2023 $6,250.40
308326 3764 12/29/2023 $2,343.14
308327 2210 12/29/2023 $3,136.87
308328 3849 12/29/2023 $4,050.46
308329 3747 12/29/2023 $2,036.64
308330 3625 12/29/2023 $1,801.87
308331 2624 12/29/2023 $2,991.48
308332 3043 12/29/2023 $2,213.64
308333 3825 12/29/2023 $1,713.64
308334 3403 12/29/2023 $2,002.02
308335 1748 12/29/2023 $2,827.29
308336 3848 12/29/2023 $1,743.55
308337 3817 12/29/2023 $1,856.17
308338 3846 12/29/2023 $3,378.16
308339 3019 12/29/2023 $4,787.87
308340 3638 12/29/2023 $3,716.03
308341 3561 12/29/2023 $2,492.31
308342 1903 12/29/2023 $1,870.97
308343 3630 12/29/2023 $2,170.90
308344 2627 12/29/2023 $2,029.99
308345 2366 12/29/2023 $2,093.52
Advices
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 3 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308346 3750 12/29/2023 $1,985.24
308347 2594 12/29/2023 $3,333.83
308348 3521 12/29/2023 $2,395.40
308349 3695 12/29/2023 $2,077.94
308350 2093 12/29/2023 $1,746.57
308351 3697 12/29/2023 $5,416.70
308352 1973 12/29/2023 $3,859.01
308353 2019 12/29/2023 $2,914.58
308354 3753 12/29/2023 $2,615.08
308355 3841 12/29/2023 $647.18
308356 2102 12/29/2023 $3,294.65
308357 2233 12/29/2023 $2,721.55
308358 3744 12/29/2023 $2,151.67
308359 2606 12/29/2023 $2,398.06
308360 3660 12/29/2023 $1,976.29
308361 3046 12/29/2023 $2,073.12
308362 1635 12/29/2023 $4,372.33
308363 3653 12/29/2023 $2,539.18
308364 3327 12/29/2023 $2,277.27
308365 3847 12/29/2023 $1,631.94
308366 3752 12/29/2023 $2,161.74
308367 3819 12/29/2023 $2,769.95
308368 3242 12/29/2023 $3,246.05
308369 2618 12/29/2023 $2,256.20
308370 3573 12/29/2023 $1,713.64
308371 2619 12/29/2023 $2,414.98
308372 2603 12/29/2023 $1,957.21
308373 2491 12/29/2023 $2,663.46
308374 2235 12/29/2023 $3,729.26
308375 2300 12/29/2023 $4,092.86
308376 3754 12/29/2023 $2,601.75
308377 2032 12/29/2023 $3,944.49
308378 3045 12/29/2023 $2,800.00
308379 3499 12/29/2023 $2,634.82
308380 3755 12/29/2023 $2,010.39
308381 3362 12/29/2023 $2,366.94
308382 2297 12/29/2023 $2,345.17
308383 2232 12/29/2023 $3,227.66
308384 1957 12/29/2023 $3,067.84
308385 3290 12/29/2023 $2,221.16
308386 3246 12/29/2023 $3,131.07
308387 3839 12/29/2023 $742.10
308388 2042 12/29/2023 $5,349.72
308389 3714 12/29/2023 $1,755.59
308390 3742 12/29/2023 $1,754.41
308391 2323 12/29/2023 $3,614.40
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 4 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308392 1767 12/29/2023 $2,854.89
308393 3508 12/29/2023 $2,537.93
308394 3740 12/29/2023 $1,867.87
308395 2225 12/29/2023 $4,266.32
308396 3544 12/29/2023 $2,041.14
308397 3221 12/29/2023 $3,491.51
308398 1855 12/29/2023 $364.20
308399 3627 12/29/2023 $3,068.33
308400 3757 12/29/2023 $3,562.53
308401 1533 12/29/2023 $2,789.67
308402 2833 12/29/2023 $2,334.88
308403 2211 12/29/2023 $4,964.03
308404 3700 12/29/2023 $1,998.75
308405 3497 12/29/2023 $1,428.90
308406 1426 12/29/2023 $1,110.30
308407 3105 12/29/2023 $1,883.69
308408 3703 12/29/2023 $2,097.16
308409 2254 12/29/2023 $3,141.62
308410 3618 12/29/2023 $2,121.22
308411 3482 12/29/2023 $2,114.18
308412 3354 12/29/2023 $3,682.02
308413 3011 12/29/2023 $1,903.81
308414 3623 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308415 3295 12/29/2023 $2,367.31
308416 3400 12/29/2023 $2,364.79
308417 3184 12/29/2023 $3,666.74
308418 3547 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308419 3673 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308420 3288 12/29/2023 $1,623.95
308421 3702 12/29/2023 $2,496.99
308422 2742 12/29/2023 $3,078.85
308423 3089 12/29/2023 $3,074.06
308424 3837 12/29/2023 $1,068.73
308425 3641 12/29/2023 $1,674.39
308426 2379 12/29/2023 $3,990.01
308427 3672 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308428 3634 12/29/2023 $2,988.62
308429 2711 12/29/2023 $2,071.74
308430 3639 12/29/2023 $1,543.68
308431 3586 12/29/2023 $1,833.54
308432 3190 12/29/2023 $3,000.71
308433 2249 12/29/2023 $5,147.11
308434 3650 12/29/2023 $2,050.35
308435 3393 12/29/2023 $1,790.76
308436 3250 12/29/2023 $1,668.36
308437 3491 12/29/2023 $1,125.37
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 5 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308438 3548 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308439 3511 12/29/2023 $2,035.01
308440 3396 12/29/2023 $2,077.93
308441 3663 12/29/2023 $2,077.93
308442 3541 12/29/2023 $2,906.08
308443 2499 12/29/2023 $3,401.16
308444 3379 12/29/2023 $2,748.69
308445 3694 12/29/2023 $2,628.42
308446 3737 12/29/2023 $2,263.82
308447 2105 12/29/2023 $5,238.23
308448 3474 12/29/2023 $2,456.73
308449 2515 12/29/2023 $3,158.20
308450 3636 12/29/2023 $2,218.43
308451 2679 12/29/2023 $3,588.85
308452 3490 12/29/2023 $3,524.33
308453 3475 12/29/2023 $2,824.84
308454 2181 12/29/2023 $3,483.53
308455 3353 12/29/2023 $2,781.25
308456 3735 12/29/2023 $4,271.84
308457 3542 12/29/2023 $3,080.28
308458 3731 12/29/2023 $2,265.91
308459 1955 12/29/2023 $3,224.68
308460 1632 12/29/2023 $2,290.63
308461 3736 12/29/2023 $2,344.95
308462 3692 12/29/2023 $3,443.76
308463 3147 12/29/2023 $3,249.62
308464 3732 12/29/2023 $2,335.62
308465 3148 12/29/2023 $3,111.00
308466 3808 12/29/2023 $2,930.16
308467 3195 12/29/2023 $2,614.98
308468 3626 12/29/2023 $2,372.15
308469 3602 12/29/2023 $2,437.56
308470 3112 12/29/2023 $2,406.66
308471 1970 12/29/2023 $2,478.35
308472 1520 12/29/2023 $2,455.18
308473 2605 12/29/2023 $2,216.96
308474 3505 12/29/2023 $4,415.49
308475 2540 12/29/2023 $3,413.53
308476 2377 12/29/2023 $2,603.89
308477 1079 12/29/2023 $3,142.06
308478 2259 12/29/2023 $3,245.01
308479 2312 12/29/2023 $3,107.16
308480 3510 12/29/2023 $2,219.32
308481 3637 12/29/2023 $2,754.21
308482 3628 12/29/2023 $2,356.69
308483 3068 12/29/2023 $2,109.68
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 6 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308484 3633 12/29/2023 $2,699.03
308485 3129 12/29/2023 $3,748.94
308486 3816 12/29/2023 $2,389.93
308487 1998 12/29/2023 $3,061.58
308488 2111 12/29/2023 $2,872.27
308489 3543 12/29/2023 $2,205.15
308490 3303 12/29/2023 $5,066.04
308491 3802 12/29/2023 $2,644.71
308492 3558 12/29/2023 $2,689.44
308493 1655 12/29/2023 $4,611.26
308494 3285 12/29/2023 $3,370.72
308495 1529 12/29/2023 $1,992.19
308496 3346 12/29/2023 $2,002.02
308497 1776 12/29/2023 $3,502.42
308498 3192 12/29/2023 $2,049.12
308499 2655 12/29/2023 $2,413.23
308500 3749 12/29/2023 $2,162.98
308501 2798 12/29/2023 $2,203.79
308502 2522 12/29/2023 $1,327.70
308503 3265 12/29/2023 $2,100.07
308504 1503 12/29/2023 $3,414.20
308505 2505 12/29/2023 $2,730.26
308506 3299 12/29/2023 $2,065.63
308507 3113 12/29/2023 $2,067.82
308508 1007 12/29/2023 $3,976.78
308509 3185 12/29/2023 $2,252.81
308510 3729 12/29/2023 $1,857.41
308511 2343 12/29/2023 $1,249.78
308512 3273 12/29/2023 $2,899.77
308513 3821 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308514 1497 12/29/2023 $3,444.46
308515 3537 12/29/2023 $2,390.69
308516 2192 12/29/2023 $2,032.17
308517 3513 12/29/2023 $2,222.28
308518 3685 12/29/2023 $828.54
308519 2034 12/29/2023 $2,211.43
308520 2275 12/29/2023 $2,879.46
308521 3380 12/29/2023 $2,839.25
308522 3191 12/29/2023 $2,214.58
308523 3792 12/29/2023 $996.60
308524 3496 12/29/2023 $939.02
308525 3051 12/29/2023 $2,577.06
308526 1750 12/29/2023 $2,240.22
308527 2770 12/29/2023 $1,879.42
308528 2228 12/29/2023 $2,627.72
308529 3827 12/29/2023 $3,254.22
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 7 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308530 3726 12/29/2023 $1,735.26
308531 3748 12/29/2023 $2,482.08
308532 3101 12/29/2023 $2,553.96
308533 3335 12/29/2023 $1,988.51
308534 3611 12/29/2023 $1,253.83
308535 3284 12/29/2023 $2,999.99
308536 3840 12/29/2023 $2,078.90
308537 3580 12/29/2023 $1,637.88
308538 3621 12/29/2023 $1,637.88
308539 3270 12/29/2023 $1,853.37
308540 2248 12/29/2023 $1,964.04
308541 3263 12/29/2023 $1,811.06
308542 3622 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308543 3795 12/29/2023 $1,271.13
308544 1588 12/29/2023 $2,209.47
308545 3788 12/29/2023 $1,834.56
308546 2189 12/29/2023 $3,124.07
308547 3560 12/29/2023 $1,739.27
308548 3509 12/29/2023 $2,123.16
308549 3226 12/29/2023 $2,092.34
308550 3257 12/29/2023 $2,247.48
308551 1121 12/29/2023 $2,490.94
308552 3149 12/29/2023 $2,365.58
308553 1865 12/29/2023 $1,952.19
308554 3479 12/29/2023 $1,637.88
308555 3689 12/29/2023 $1,718.53
308556 1723 12/29/2023 $1,952.85
308557 3296 12/29/2023 $2,364.93
308558 3791 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308559 3707 12/29/2023 $1,789.98
308560 3572 12/29/2023 $1,267.52
308561 2531 12/29/2023 $2,865.92
308562 1513 12/29/2023 $2,177.96
308563 3283 12/29/2023 $3,251.97
308564 2118 12/29/2023 $1,421.35
308565 3387 12/29/2023 $1,176.91
308566 3330 12/29/2023 $1,804.06
308567 2681 12/29/2023 $3,306.86
308568 2119 12/29/2023 $1,869.42
308569 1612 12/29/2023 $1,847.98
308570 1282 12/29/2023 $2,307.61
308571 3610 12/29/2023 $1,637.88
308572 3277 12/29/2023 $2,147.87
308573 3287 12/29/2023 $1,908.11
308574 3037 12/29/2023 $2,181.73
308575 1449 12/29/2023 $2,958.05
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 8 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308576 3481 12/29/2023 $1,853.36
308577 2677 12/29/2023 $4,858.45
308578 3688 12/29/2023 $1,637.88
308579 3341 12/29/2023 $2,505.96
308580 1137 12/29/2023 $2,757.01
308581 3793 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308582 2383 12/29/2023 $2,110.75
308583 3687 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308584 3130 12/29/2023 $2,097.66
308585 2489 12/29/2023 $1,948.09
308586 3733 12/29/2023 $1,912.66
308587 3361 12/29/2023 $1,898.40
308588 3624 12/29/2023 $2,150.03
308589 3139 12/29/2023 $1,572.06
308590 3099 12/29/2023 $2,434.01
308591 2696 12/29/2023 $1,715.93
308592 1287 12/29/2023 $2,944.99
308593 3536 12/29/2023 $2,825.81
308594 3722 12/29/2023 $1,699.31
308595 1254 12/29/2023 $2,058.50
308596 3187 12/29/2023 $2,536.70
308597 3804 12/29/2023 $2,623.97
308598 2368 12/29/2023 $2,468.26
308599 3532 12/29/2023 $1,984.19
308600 3798 12/29/2023 $1,089.39
308601 3258 12/29/2023 $1,695.26
308602 3100 12/29/2023 $2,784.13
308603 3259 12/29/2023 $1,676.45
308604 3796 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308605 3344 12/29/2023 $2,093.30
308606 1338 12/29/2023 $4,145.54
308607 3507 12/29/2023 $1,901.21
308608 2229 12/29/2023 $1,957.78
308609 3790 12/29/2023 $1,247.64
308610 1049 12/29/2023 $2,344.00
308611 1506 12/29/2023 $1,958.11
308612 1959 12/29/2023 $3,638.44
308613 3004 12/29/2023 $2,367.76
308614 1893 12/29/2023 $2,038.97
308615 3794 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308616 1581 12/29/2023 $2,609.84
308617 1932 12/29/2023 $2,006.40
308618 3279 12/29/2023 $1,883.69
308619 3725 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308620 2460 12/29/2023 $2,123.89
308621 3671 12/29/2023 $1,746.96
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 9 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308622 2732 12/29/2023 $1,879.42
308623 3338 12/29/2023 $1,696.27
308624 2552 12/29/2023 $2,304.83
308625 2476 12/29/2023 $3,767.33
308626 2279 12/29/2023 $3,346.64
308627 3515 12/29/2023 $5,627.60
308628 3092 12/29/2023 $3,054.67
308629 3836 12/29/2023 $896.07
308630 3138 12/29/2023 $3,273.38
308631 3146 12/29/2023 $2,787.66
308632 2590 12/29/2023 $2,468.35
308633 2748 12/29/2023 $2,158.69
308634 3709 12/29/2023 $3,002.19
308635 2669 12/29/2023 $2,384.40
308636 2623 12/29/2023 $2,088.22
308637 2637 12/29/2023 $2,537.17
308638 2638 12/29/2023 $1,396.38
308639 3803 12/29/2023 $1,992.48
308640 3109 12/29/2023 $3,077.60
308641 2671 12/29/2023 $3,007.12
308642 2593 12/29/2023 $2,616.49
308643 3328 12/29/2023 $2,560.92
308644 3461 12/29/2023 $2,193.20
308645 3038 12/29/2023 $2,741.96
308646 3052 12/29/2023 $2,142.96
308647 2290 12/29/2023 $2,251.36
308648 3716 12/29/2023 $1,834.16
308649 3110 12/29/2023 $3,425.05
308650 2641 12/29/2023 $2,293.65
308651 2612 12/29/2023 $2,338.96
308652 3698 12/29/2023 $1,603.95
308653 2642 12/29/2023 $3,766.60
308654 3705 12/29/2023 $2,063.99
308655 3331 12/29/2023 $2,454.62
308656 2674 12/29/2023 $2,912.98
308657 3231 12/29/2023 $2,355.29
308658 3228 12/29/2023 $2,737.94
308659 2628 12/29/2023 $2,734.03
308660 3301 12/29/2023 $1,922.20
308661 2630 12/29/2023 $2,861.18
308662 3182 12/29/2023 $2,532.99
308663 2599 12/29/2023 $2,276.32
308664 2683 12/29/2023 $2,440.12
308665 2753 12/29/2023 $2,293.75
308666 2610 12/29/2023 $2,742.51
308667 1389 12/29/2023 $4,504.10
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 10 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308668 3264 12/29/2023 $1,964.52
308669 2808 12/29/2023 $1,964.15
308670 2646 12/29/2023 $3,986.71
308671 3617 12/29/2023 $2,948.62
308672 2600 12/29/2023 $2,823.63
308673 2524 12/29/2023 $2,810.27
308674 2686 12/29/2023 $2,123.68
308675 2193 12/29/2023 $2,461.75
308676 3322 12/29/2023 $2,558.78
308677 3629 12/29/2023 $2,110.09
308678 3230 12/29/2023 $3,180.38
308679 1931 12/29/2023 $2,871.18
308680 2038 12/29/2023 $2,277.13
308681 2339 12/29/2023 $2,485.75
308682 2678 12/29/2023 $4,121.97
308683 3240 12/29/2023 $2,552.23
308684 3743 12/29/2023 $1,752.93
308685 3215 12/29/2023 $1,076.65
308686 3140 12/29/2023 $2,075.47
308687 3035 12/29/2023 $1,994.97
308688 3651 12/29/2023 $2,161.06
308689 3769 12/29/2023 $170.26
308690 1853 12/29/2023 $2,924.83
308691 3645 12/29/2023 $771.07
308692 3503 12/29/2023 $2,848.46
308693 2488 12/29/2023 $1,130.72
308694 3120 12/29/2023 $1,006.54
308695 3806 12/29/2023 $670.44
308696 3768 12/29/2023 $23.22
308697 3252 12/29/2023 $2,753.71
308698 3070 12/29/2023 $2,307.00
308699 3657 12/29/2023 $836.99
308700 3767 12/29/2023 $116.09
308701 3674 12/29/2023 $950.56
308702 3766 12/29/2023 $208.96
308703 3655 12/29/2023 $950.56
308704 3813 12/29/2023 $946.29
308705 3656 12/29/2023 $896.29
308706 3789 12/29/2023 $4,044.54
308707 3775 12/29/2023 $224.44
308708 2478 12/29/2023 $1,096.20
308709 3779 12/29/2023 $205.09
308710 3471 12/29/2023 $1,076.93
308711 3531 12/29/2023 $4,372.33
308712 3814 12/29/2023 $1,007.37
308713 3587 12/29/2023 $836.99
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 11 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308714 3669 12/29/2023 $228.01
308715 3029 12/29/2023 $2,355.74
308716 3812 12/29/2023 $946.29
308717 3326 12/29/2023 $3,236.09
308718 3609 12/29/2023 $1,116.62
308719 3770 12/29/2023 $150.92
308720 3492 12/29/2023 $381.75
308721 3691 12/29/2023 $946.29
308722 3810 12/29/2023 $950.56
308723 3576 12/29/2023 $1,116.62
308724 3647 12/29/2023 $518.53
308725 3566 12/29/2023 $410.18
308726 3579 12/29/2023 $1,020.46
308727 3386 12/29/2023 $2,518.54
308728 3502 12/29/2023 $2,159.19
308729 3724 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308730 1866 12/29/2023 $2,731.00
308731 3822 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308732 3824 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308733 3823 12/29/2023 $1,165.06
308734 3368 12/29/2023 $2,006.13
308735 2006 12/29/2023 $3,836.61
308736 3761 12/29/2023 $2,727.74
308737 2684 12/29/2023 $2,424.06
308738 3079 12/29/2023 $2,122.39
308739 1966 12/29/2023 $2,789.05
308740 3844 12/29/2023 $1,834.56
308741 3388 12/29/2023 $1,844.52
308742 2355 12/29/2023 $2,819.39
308743 3696 12/29/2023 $2,538.73
308744 3500 12/29/2023 $3,040.41
308745 3620 12/29/2023 $1,735.26
308746 3654 12/29/2023 $1,601.36
308747 2039 12/29/2023 $1,879.42
308748 3838 12/29/2023 $915.38
308749 3281 12/29/2023 $2,130.53
308750 3550 12/29/2023 $2,591.31
308751 2629 12/29/2023 $2,142.71
308752 3348 12/29/2023 $1,934.20
308753 3807 12/29/2023 $2,356.81
308754 3081 12/29/2023 $2,011.56
308755 3523 12/29/2023 $4,498.62
308756 3271 12/29/2023 $1,926.00
308757 3017 12/29/2023 $5,357.83
308758 3706 12/29/2023 $1,730.03
308759 3512 12/29/2023 $2,589.20
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 12 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308760 2027 12/29/2023 $2,249.73
308761 2330 12/29/2023 $2,894.43
308762 2795 12/29/2023 $529.88
308763 3437 12/29/2023 $5,031.40
308764 3652 12/29/2023 $2,205.77
308765 3421 12/29/2023 $7,500.50
308766 3439 12/29/2023 $3,614.28
308767 3440 12/29/2023 $4,194.14
308768 3441 12/29/2023 $3,523.23
308769 3473 12/29/2023 $3,234.28
308770 3820 12/29/2023 $2,273.77
308771 3406 12/29/2023 $3,158.17
308772 3422 12/29/2023 $4,382.84
308773 3442 12/29/2023 $3,963.34
308774 3433 12/29/2023 $4,637.73
308775 3469 12/29/2023 $4,106.11
308776 3424 12/29/2023 $3,742.50
308777 3414 12/29/2023 $4,729.43
308778 3704 12/29/2023 $2,567.33
308779 3734 12/29/2023 $4,789.53
308780 3832 12/29/2023 $3,474.75
308781 3799 12/29/2023 $2,294.34
308782 3443 12/29/2023 $2,565.98
308783 3600 12/29/2023 $2,446.45
308784 3711 12/29/2023 $3,365.09
308785 3715 12/29/2023 $2,043.45
308786 3444 12/29/2023 $4,332.16
308787 3583 12/29/2023 $6,904.29
308788 3594 12/29/2023 $5,731.09
308789 1718 12/29/2023 $6,798.74
308790 3409 12/29/2023 $5,002.44
308791 3426 12/29/2023 $3,157.21
308792 3642 12/29/2023 $2,580.35
308793 3584 12/29/2023 $4,828.64
308794 3746 12/29/2023 $1,998.76
308795 3538 12/29/2023 $2,162.10
308796 3410 12/29/2023 $4,711.39
308797 3828 12/29/2023 $2,294.34
308798 3447 12/29/2023 $4,642.80
308799 3427 12/29/2023 $4,934.00
308800 3411 12/29/2023 $6,697.26
308801 3448 12/29/2023 $4,060.40
308802 3719 12/29/2023 $1,601.36
308803 3833 12/29/2023 $4,156.98
308804 3518 12/29/2023 $2,147.52
308805 3449 12/29/2023 $4,294.02
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 13 of 15 01/30/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
308806 3428 12/29/2023 $4,437.88
308807 3429 12/29/2023 $2,154.47
308808 3455 12/29/2023 $3,624.75
308809 3451 12/29/2023 $4,319.84
308810 3712 12/29/2023 $3,535.45
308811 3595 12/29/2023 $5,313.29
308812 3430 12/29/2023 $4,124.47
308813 3452 12/29/2023 $5,829.16
308814 3417 12/29/2023 $3,126.82
308815 3085 12/29/2023 $2,175.26
308816 3431 12/29/2023 $3,543.02
308817 3419 12/29/2023 $2,881.23
308818 3720 12/29/2023 $2,690.79
308819 3524 12/29/2023 $5,070.90
308820 3412 12/29/2023 $4,789.21
308821 3805 12/29/2023 $2,120.52
308822 3829 12/29/2023 $2,482.25
308823 3830 12/29/2023 $2,716.88
308824 3420 12/29/2023 $4,549.11
308825 3800 12/29/2023 $2,294.34
308826 3432 12/29/2023 $3,743.96
308827 3408 12/29/2023 $4,612.86
308828 3456 12/29/2023 $3,127.35
308829 3763 12/29/2023 $2,780.89
308830 3591 12/29/2023 $4,141.23
308831 3392 12/29/2023 $4,380.13
308832 3831 12/29/2023 $2,482.88
308833 3434 12/29/2023 $3,302.88
Advices Total 1,350,537.18
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 14 of 15 01/30/2024 Total Gross
$1,118.61
$265.52
$235,660.92
$281.73
$56.87
$67,772.30
$3,682.53
$37,452.96
$336,858.95
Electronic Vendor Payments Total 683,150.39
IRS
IRS
12/22/2023
12/29/2023
State Taxes
State Taxes
12/22/2023
12/29/2023
State Taxes
CASDU
12/18/2023
12/29/2023
Deferred Comp (457)
PERS
1/2/2024
1/5/2024
Electronic Vendor Payments
Vendor
IRS
Check Date
12/15/2023
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 15 of 15 01/30/2024 Item Number: 5
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: March 5, 2024
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 in the amount of $10,357,144.81, covering Electronic Fund Transfers No. 338030 through 338172 and Warrant No. 794102 through 794320 for 02/08/2024 through 02/21/2024, and Wire Transfers dated 02/14/2024 and 02/15/2024, per the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 for the period covering July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024.
Fiscal Impact:
The total fiscal impact for FY23-24 in the amount of $10,357,144.81 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the total funds paid to vendors.
Background:
Pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code (2.24.080) the attached demands were presented by the departments, audited by the Finance Department and subsequent warrants/wire transfers were issued. All were found to be in conformity to City policies and procedures and funds were budgeted or available to pay said demands. List of commercial warrants and wire transfers are now being presented to Council for approval.
Attachments: A. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 Check Register Summary
ATTACHMENT A:
Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 Check Register Summary
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 02/22/2024 07:55
User: djustman
Program ID: apchkrcn