City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR
JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
Regular Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, February 18, 2025
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
The
City
Council
holds
its
business
meetings
in
public
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
Ralph
M.
Brown
Act,
its
established
policies
and
procedures,
and
its
adopted
parliamentary
authority.
The
Council
strives
to
carry
out
its
meetings
in
an
atmosphere
of
professionalism
with
full
participation
by
members
of
the
body
and
the
public.
As
such,
the
Presiding
Officer
is
empowered
to
govern
City
Council
Meetings
to
foster
the
efficient
and
fair
administration
of
City
business
and
reserves
the
right
to
enforce
(or
cause
to
be
enforced)
the
Meeting
Rules
of
Conduct
and
Decorum
as
set
forth
in
Chapter
5 of
the
City
Council Policy and Procedures Manual.
The
City
Council
welcomes
and
encourages
public
participation
and
invites
the
community
to
attend
in
person.
City
Council
Meetings
will
be
held
in-person
at
City
Hall
in
Council
Chambers.
Remote
viewing
of
our
Council
Meetings
is
available
through
YouTube,
but
public
comments
must
be
given
in-person
at
the
meeting or in advance as noted below.
Public
Comments:
Members
of
the
public
may
submit
comments
electronically
by
4 p.m.
the
day
of
the
meeting
to
be
distributed
to
City
Council.
Participants
are
invited
to
address
the
Council
on
agendized
and
non-agendized
topics
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
Public
comments
will
be
no
longer
than
three
(3)
minutes
per
community
member.
Should
a
speaker
conclude
their
comments
prior
to
the
expiration
of
three
(3)
minutes,
the
speaker
waives
the
right
to
speak
for
any
remaining
amount
of
time.
For
further
information
about
how
to
address
the
Council,
please refer to the City's website at
victorvilleca.gov/agendas
.
LEVINE
ACT
DISCLOSURE:
Pursuant
to
the
Levine
Act
(Govt.
Code
section
84308),
any
party
to
a
permit,
license,
contract,
or
other
entitlement
before
the
Victorville
City
Council
is
required
to
disclose
on
the
record
any
campaign
contribution,
including
aggregated
contributions,
of
more
than
$250
made
by
the
party
or
the
party's
agents
within
the
preceding
12 months
to
any
City
official.
Participants
and
agents
are
requested
to
make
this
disclosure
as
well.
The
disclosure
must
include
the
name
of
the
party,
participant,
or
agent,
and
any
other
person
making
the
contribution;
the
name
of
the
recipient,
the
amount
of
the
contribution,
and
the
date
the
contribution was made.
In
compliance
with
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act,
if
you
need
special
assistance
to
participate
in
this
meeting,
please
contact
the
City
Clerk's
office
at
(760)
955-5188
no
later
than
72 hours
prior
to
the
meeting.
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Introduction to Public Comments
Public Comments for Closed Session Items
Declaration of Closed Session Item(s) by City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL
A.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property Location: Assessor’s Parcel Number: 0478-105-05 City Negotiators: Keith C. Metzler, City Manager, or authorized designee Negotiating Parties: Christina Tesso
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
B.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – LIABILITY CLAIM
Government Code Section 54956.95
Claimant: J.W., a minor, by and through Guardian ad Litem, Amber Elliot Agency claimed against: City of Victorville
Recess to Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Closed Session Announcements by the City Attorney
Invocation: Pastor Josh Gerbracht from First Assembly of God
Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain Randy German
Proclamations/Special Presentations
Presentation
Recognizing
Aimee
Calderon,
Winner
of
the
City’s
Annual
Civil
Rights
Memorial
Essay
Contest
and,
Heritage
Victor
Valley
Medical
Group,
Sponsor
of
the City’s Annual Civil Rights Memorial Essay Contest
City Clerk Swearing in of Captain Joel Jensen
City Clerk Swearing in of Captain Max Chavez
City Clerk Swearing in of Firefighter EMT Isaac Vasquez
City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda
Conflict of Interest Declarations
Any
items
on
this
agenda
that
might
be
a
conflict
of
interest
to
any
Council
Members/Board Members should be identified at this time.
Introduction to Public Comments
Public Comments
APPEAL HEARING(S)
1. An
Appeal
of
the
Planning
Commission’s
decision
regarding
Planning
Case
No.
PLAN23-00003
–
A
Site
Plan
with
a
Mitigated
Negative
Declaration
to
allow
for
the
development
of
an
approximately
400,000
square
foot
warehouse
distribution
building
on
two
vacant
M-2
(Heavy
Industrial)
zoned
parcels
totaling
approximately
18 acres
located
at
the
southwest
corner
of
the
logical
extension
of
Cactus
Road
and Mesa Linda Avenue
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Open
and
conduct
a
public
hearing,
receiving
testimony
regarding
the
proposed
appeal;
(2) Close the public hearing; and
(3)
Adopt
Resolution
No.
25-015
–
Affirming
the
Decision
of
the
Planning
Commission
to
approve
Site
Plan
Case
No.
PLAN23-00003
as
conditioned
and
finding
that
the
project
environmental
analysis
was
appropriately
assessed
via
a
Mitigated
Negative
Declaration
that
includes
mitigation
measures
to
ensure
the
impacts on the environment and community are less than significant.
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
2. An
Amendment
to
the
Victorville
Municipal
Code
with
an
Environmental
Exemption
to
make
various
changes
Citywide
to
Title
16 including
but
not
limited
to
new
and
updated
definitions,
new
land
use
allowances
and
standards
related
to
thrift
retail
stores,
revised
landscape
standards,
and
an
update
and
clarification
to
tentative
tract map approval periods
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
conduct
a
public
hearing,
receive
public
testimony,
and take the following actions:
(1)
Find
the
Code
Amendment
exempt
pursuant
to
Section
15061(b)(3)
of
the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
(2)
Introduce
Ordinance
No.
2454
for
adoption,
and
first
reading
by
title
only,
to
amend Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code; and (3) Waive a further reading in full of proposed Ordinance No. 2454.
3. Mid-Year
Budget
Review
and
Amendment
Request
to
the
Fiscal
Year
2024-2025
Revised Fiscal Budget
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
approve
the
changes
reflected in this agenda item along with the included attachments by adopting:
(1)
Resolution
No.
25-013
of
the
City
Council
of
the
City
of
Victorville
amending
Resolution
24-037,
as
amended,
the
budget
resolution
for
the
City
of
Victorville
for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025, relating to an appropriation of funds. (2)
Resolution
No.
VWD-25-003
of
the
Board
of
Directors
of
the
Victorville
Water
District
amending
Resolution
VWD-24-006,
as
amended,
the
budget
resolution
for
the
Victorville
Water
District
for
Fiscal
Year
2024-2025,
relating
to
an
appropriation
of funds.
(3)
Resolution
No.
SCLAA-25-003
of
the
Board
of
Directors
of
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
amending
Resolution
SCLAA-24-003,
as
amended,
the
budget
resolution
for
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, relating to an appropriation of funds. (4)
Resolution
No.
CHAS
25-001
of
the
City
Council
of
the
City
of
Victorville
as
the
Housing
Asset
Successor
to
the
Victorville
Redevelopment
Agency
amending
Resolution
CHAS
24-003,
as
amended,
the
budget
resolution
for
the
City
as
the
Housing
Asset
Successor
for
Fiscal
Year
2024-2025,
relating
to
an
appropriation
of
funds.
(5)
Resolution
No.
LBT
25-001
of
the
Library
Board
of
Trustees
amending
Resolution
No.
LBT
24-002,
as
amended,
the
budget
resolution
for
the
Victorville
Library for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, relating to an appropriation of funds.
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 17516
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Sewer
Improvement
Labor and Materials Security for Tract Map No. 17516.
5. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 13816
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Landscaping
Maintenance
Assessment
District
(LMAD)
Labor
and
Materials
Security
for
Tract
Map No. 13816.
6. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 15295
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Landscaping
Maintenance
Assessment
District
(LMAD)
Labor
and
Materials
Security
for
Tract
Map No. 15295.
7. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 16774
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Street
Improvement
Labor and Materials Security for Tract Map No. 16774.
8. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 15896-1
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
Labor
and
Materials
Securities
for
Water,
Drainage,
Sewer,
and
Street
Improvements
for
Tract
Map
No.
15896-1.
9. Security Substitution for Tract Map No. 17292-1
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Approve
the
execution
of
a
Subdivision
Improvement
Agreement
with
Richmond
American Homes of Maryland, Inc., for Tract Map No. 17292-1; (2)
Accept
new
securities
(bonds)
for
the
required
public
improvements
for
Tract
Map No. 17292-1;
(3)
Approve
the
execution
of
a
Release
of
the
existing
Subdivision
Agreement
with
Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC., for Tract Map No. 17292-1; (4)
Approve
the
execution
of
a
Release
of
the
existing
Land
Division
Improvement
Construction
Agreement
with
Trimark
Pacific-Olivine,
LLC.,
for
Tract
Map
No.
17292-1; and
(5)
Approve
the
execution
of
a
Release
of
the
existing
Utility
Surety
Agreement
with
Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC., for Tract Map No. 17292-1.
10. Substitution
of
Trustee,
Deed
of
Reconveyance
and
Cancellation
of
CC&Rs
for
Residential
Rehabilitation
Program
case
number
23-12-21
(14221
Surrey
Ct.,
Victorville,
CA
92394);
as
well
as
acceptance
and
reallocation
of
associated
Program Income funds
Recommendation:
That
City
Council
take
the
following
actions
regarding
Residential
Rehabilitation
Program Case No. 23-12-21:
(1) Approve the Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance; (2)
Confirm
the
required
Cancellation
of
the
original
Covenants,
Conditions
and
Restrictions (CC&Rs);
(3)
Authorize
the
execution
of
the
Substitution
of
Trustee
and
Deed
of
Reconveyance
as
well
as
the
Cancellation
of
the
original
CC&Rs
by
the
Deputy
City Manager;
(4)
Accept
the
payoff
of
the
loan
receivable
to
the
Residential
Rehabilitation
Program Income Account; and
(5)
Adopt
Resolution
No.
25-012,
amending
the
annual
budget
for
fiscal
year
2024-
2025
reallocating
the
subject
$14,408.54
Residential
Rehabilitation
Program
–
Program Income funds to the Residential Rehabilitation Program.
11. Southern California Logistics Airport Annual Activity Report for Calendar Year 2024
Recommendation:
That
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
(“SCLAA”)
Board
review
and
file
the
attached
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
(“SCLA”)
Annual
Activity
Report for Calendar Year 2024.
12. Payroll Demand Schedule No. 5B
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Payroll
Demand
Schedule
No.
5B
for
Payroll
Period
November
8,
2024,
through
November
22,
2024,
in
the
amount
of
$2,324,572.15
covering
Check
Nos.
34382
through
34395,
including
Vendor
checks.
Also
included
are
Advice
Nos.
321449
through
322012,
per
adopted
budget
for
Fiscal
Year
2024-2025
(period
covering
July
1,
2024,
through
June 30, 2025).
13. City Council Members’ Proof of Residency
Recommendation:
That the City Council receive the proof of residency information as provided herein.
14. Notice of Completion for Building 686 Roof Replacement Project #CC24-013
Recommendation:
That the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Board of Directors:
(1)
Approve
the
Notice
of
Completion
for
Building
686
Roof
Replacement,
Project
#CC24-013; and
(2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the Notice of Completion.
15. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Commercial
Demand
Schedule
No.
15 in
the
amount
of
$8,143,841.17,
covering
Electronic
Fund
Transfers
No.
342691
through
342947
and
Warrant
No.
798327
through
798515
for
01/23/2025
through
02/05/2025,
per
the
adopted
budget
for
Fiscal
Year
2024-2025
for
the
period covering July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
16. Benefits Resolution No. 25-010 and the Employee Salary Schedule
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
adopt
Benefits
Resolution
No.
25-010,
establishing
the
Employee
Salary
Schedule
and
amending
Fringe
Benefits,
effective
February
18, 2025.
17. Purchase
of
a
Rovver
X/RXSAT
2.0 Main
Line
and
Lateral
Launch
Inspection
System with 2024 E-Transit Cutaway and 16-Foot Studio Build-Out
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
award
Haaker
Equipment
Company,
as
the
authorized
distributor,
the
piggyback
purchase
of
a
Rovver
X/RXSAT
2.0 Main
Line
and
Lateral
Launch
Inspection
System,
which
includes
a
2024
Ford
E-Transit
Cutaway
vehicle
with
a
custom
16-foot
studio
build-out,
for
an
amount
not
to
exceed $504,912.18, under Sourcewell Contract #120721-EVS.
18. Purchase
of
New
Fleet
Vehicles
and
Equipment
for
Fiscal
Year
2025
Under
Project
JM25-041 (32 Vehicles)
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council,
also
sitting
as
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport Authority (“SCLAA”) and Victorville Water District Board of Directors:
(1)
Approve
the
purchase
of
23 vehicles
from
Ken
Grody
Ford
for
an
amount
not
to
exceed $1,400,277.01.
(2)
Approve
the
procurement
of
the
remaining
nine
(9)
vehicles
through
several
procurement
methods
such
as
cooperative
purchasing
programs,
lead
agency
piggyback
programs,
and
availability
of
suitable
dealer
lot
inventory,
with
a
10%
contingency
due
to
market
volatility,
bringing
the
total
budget
for
these
vehicles
to
$1,037,300.
(3)
Authorize
the
City
Manager/Executive
Director/General
Manager
to
execute
any
and all documents necessary for such purchases.
19. Building 724 Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning System Replacement
Recommendation:
That the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Board of Directors:
(1)
Reject
FM
Thomas
Air
Conditioning
Inc.,
award
to
furnish
and
install
a
new
HVAC
system
at
Building
724,
previously
approved
by
the
Board
on
December
17,
2024, and;
(2)
Approve
Amendment
Four
to
the
General
Services
Provider
Standard
Agreement
between
SCLAA
and
Allison
Mechanical,
Inc.,
increasing
the
not
to
exceed compensation amount from $50,000 to $150,000 and; (3)
Approve
Allison
Mechanical,
Inc.,
to
furnish
and
install
a
new
Heating,
Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (“HVAC”) system at Building 724.
20. Standard
Sublease
Agreement
for
Buildings
868,
868A,
869
and
835
by
and
between
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
and
Anduril
Industries,
Inc.
Recommendation:
That
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
(“SCLAA”)
Board
of
Directors:
(1)
Approve
entering
into
a
Standard
Sublease
Agreement
for
Building
868,
868A,
869
and
835
(“Agreement”),
by
and
between
the
SCLAA
and
Anduril
Industries,
Inc., (“Anduril”); and
(2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute said Agreement; and (3)
Adopt
Resolution
No.
SCLAA
25-004
amending
the
2024/2025
budget
decreasing revenue in Airport account 4501175A-45200 by $101,155.71.
21. Approval of a new Legal Services Agreement for the City Attorney
Recommendation:
It
is
the
recommendation
that
the
Honorable
City
Council
consider
approval
of
a
new Legal Services Agreement for the City Attorney.
22. Discussion
and
possible
action
to
rename
Mustang
Street
to
Exquadrum
Way
at
the Southern California Logistics Airport
Recommendation:
That
Your
Honorable
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
deny
the
request
to
rename
Mustang
Street
to
Exquadrum
Way
based
on
the
fact
that
Mustang
Street
is not a dedicated public road.
23. City Manager Reports
24. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Upcoming Agenda Items
25. Reports from Council Members
Adjournment
Item Number: 1
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing(s)
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Alex Jauregui, City Planner
Subject:
An Appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision regarding Planning Case No. PLAN23- 00003 – A Site Plan with a Mitigated Negative Declaration to allow for the development of an approximately 400,000 square foot warehouse distribution building on two vacant M-2 (Heavy Industrial) zoned parcels totaling approximately 18 acres located at the southwest corner of the logical extension of Cactus Road and Mesa Linda Avenue Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Open and conduct a public hearing, receiving testimony regarding the proposed appeal;
(2) Close the public hearing; and
(3) Adopt Resolution No. 25-015 – Affirming the Decision of the Planning Commission to approve Site Plan Case No. PLAN23-00003 as conditioned and finding that the project environmental analysis was appropriately assessed via a Mitigated Negative Declaration that includes mitigation measures to ensure the impacts on the environment and community are less than significant.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Background:
On January 8, 2025, the Planning Commission unanimously (5-0) approved Case No.
PLAN23-00003 via the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. P-24-055 (Attachment E). The subject case was originally scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission first on November 13th, 2024, then continued again on December 11th, 2024, to afford the applicant, Steeno Design Studio, Inc. time to address comments received during the CEQA review and public noticing process, which included comments received by the appellant, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. 4 0
0 9
The Planning Commission’s approval would allow for the development of an approximately 400,000 square foot industrial building for warehousing and distribution totaling 396,131 square feet, comprised of 381,198 sq. ft. allocated to warehouse space and 14,933 sq. ft. of ancillary office space. Site improvements will be comprised of 72 total truck dock positions, two grade doors, 91 trailer stalls, 178 auto parking stalls, and related site, landscaping, drainage, and street improvements. Inclusive of the projects design features to reduce or eliminate environmental impacts, conditions of approval were also contained within the project approval that ensure the impacts of the project on the environment and the community are less than significant.
On January 15, 2025, the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision (Attachment C), which appeals the entire decision of the Planning Commission, asserting the Commission did not adequately investigate nor mitigate the project and are of the belief the Planning Commission did not fulfill their duty to address the environmental, social, and economic burdens the project imposes on Victorville residents.
In response to the appeal filing, on February 3, 2025, the applicant’s legal counsel provided a written response (Attachment D) refuting the claims indicated by the appellant, noting, following an extensive and legally compliant review process the Planning Commission chose to approve the project through a transparent review, which included public notices, stakeholder input and expert analysis from project consultants and City staff.
Discussion:
Appeal Synopsis
An appeal has been filed by the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA) regarding Planning Department Case No. PLAN23-00003 (Attachment C), seeking to overturn the approval of the subject case, citing their belief that the environmental document contained “flaws” and the analysis failed to adequately address environmental, social and economic burdens placed on the City of Victorville and its residents. Further, the appellant asserts concerns raised by their firm in a comment letter dated October 31, 2024 (included within Attachment C), remain as the basis of their appeal, stating the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project was flawed and did not adequately evaluate the projects, air quality and health risk impacts and that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared.
Appeal Response
Prior to the project’s Planning Commission public hearing on January 8 th, 2025, and in response to the comments received from GSEJA on October 31 st, 2024, the project applicant’s environmental consultant prepared a formal response to the concerns raised by GSEJA (see City Council Attachment F – “Planning Commission Attachment F”). This response refutes many of the claims in the opposition letter while also clarifying the 4 0
0 9
project’s compliance with CEQA mandates and the project’s conformance with local air quality regulations, while also responding to concerns raised regarding Environmental Justice. The response to comment was provided to the Planning Commission as a part of the project agenda item and was considered by the Planning Commission with the ultimate project approval.
Provided as Attachment D of this report, the project applicant’s legal representative has provided a response to the appeal filing indicating the applicant, the City and ultimately the Planning Commission conducted a thorough, transparent, and exhaustive environmental analysis that ultimately ensured the project and the community impacts as well as benefits were thoroughly evaluated, and the Planning Commission did not error in its decision. Further, this response highlights the appellant’s failure to attend or submit a formal opposition to the project before or during the Planning Commission’s January 8th hearing, which raises questions about the validity of the appeal.
Environmental Justice
The appellant asserts the environmental review fails to adequately consider the relevant Environmental Justice issues when considering the impacts of the project on the community. Environmental Justice is defined by California law as the fair treatment of people of all races, incomes, and ethnicity with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies (Government Code, Section 65040.12[e]). Addressed in the City’s General Plan, the Environmental Justice Element contains Objectives and Policies that set actionable targets that guide policy decisions in the City. Examples of some of the noted policies include creating land use patterns that encourage people to travel in methods other than personal motor vehicles, increasing public transit availability, requiring vegetative barriers and increased tree canopies to benefit disadvantaged communities to list a few.
Environmental Justice (EJ) while not a direct CEQA mandated discussion, has been considered by the Planning Commission as a part of the project review and approval. The project is neither impeding the application of the relevant policies or objectives or imposing greater risk to a disadvantaged community. The appellant infers the project fails to adequately address (EJ) Objectives and Policies such as:
•Reduce pollution exposure and improve air quality.
•Create land use patterns that encourage people to walk, bike, or use public transit to reduce emissions from mobile sources.
•Mitigate impacts of pollution and separate pollution sources from sensitive land uses. •Require setbacks and vegetative barriers within City rights-of-way between new industrial and developments and sensitive land uses, such as residents in the area. •Improve tree canopy and promote green infrastructure development in disadvantaged communities.
•Encourage new development to include a healthy food supply or edible garden, or to be located within a quarter to half mile of a healthy food supply, where feasible and appropriate.
4 0
0 9
As demonstrated by studies provided, the proposed development: would not exceed local air quality regulations and requirements; accounts for and encourages the use of public transportation with the development of new roadways, which will include bike paths, where there are currently dirt roads; is not adjacent to or near any sensitive land uses with the nearest residents approximately 2,000 ft. to the west on the opposite side of U.S.
Highway 395; includes an extensive landscape design that includes greater than 100 trees; and does not impede access to future food supplies by developing an industrial land use within an area zoned for industrial use.
Conclusion
Staff disagrees with the appellant’s position, as their concerns were addressed during the Planning Commission review and no new evidence was presented in the appeal application. With the implementation of the conditions of approval contained in the Planning Commission approval, the adoption of all required environmental mitigation measures from the project’s environmental review, and implementation of the latest California Building Code requirements, staff finds that the Planning Commission did not error in their decision to approve the project.
Should the City Council concur with City staff's assessment of the action taken by the Planning Commission, appropriate findings have been included in Resolution No. 25-015 as outlined in the “Recommendation” section of this report. However, should the City Council seek to modify the decision of the Planning Commission, findings should be made to the contrary and shall be stated for the record.
Attachments:
Attachment A. Aerial Image
Attachment B. City Council Resolution No. 25-015
Attachment C. Appeal Application – January 15, 2025
Attachment D. Applicant Response to Appeal – February 3, 2025 Attachment E. Approved Planning Commission Resolution No. P-24-055 Attachment F. Planning Commission Staff Report & Attachments – January 8, 2025 Attachment G. Planning Commission Meeting Executive Summary & Verbatim Minutes
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT A
Aerial Image
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT B
City Council Resolution No. 25-015
RESOLUTION NO. 25-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE SITE PLAN CASE NO.
PLAN23-00003; A SITE PLAN WITH A MI TIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROXIMATELY 400,000 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDI NG ON TWO VACANT M-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONED PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 18 ACRES LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LOGICAL EXTENSIONS OF CACTUS ROAD
AND MESA LINDA AVENUE
WHEREAS, an application was received from Steeno Design Studio, Inc. regarding property in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, particularly described as follows:
PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCE L MAP NO. 14027, IN THE CI TY OF VICTORVILLE,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 196, PAGES 85, 86 AND 87, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on the 8th day of January 2025, pursuant to Title 7, Division I, Chapter 4, of the Government Code, State of California, to hear arguments for and against the project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Ca lifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Victorville Planning Department undertook and completed an Initial Study for the project, the result of which was the preparation and circulation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and analysis; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study, s upporting documents, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Site Plan have been present ed to the Planning Resolution No. 25-015 February 18, 2025
Commission, and after review and considerat ion of the environmental information the Planning Commission found that wit h the mitigation measures included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration the proposal would not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Initial Study prepared for the project, including all supporting ev idence and comments received, all of which documents are hereby incorporated by reference into this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission f ound that the site is adequate in size to accommodate the proposed use al ong with adequate development standards to ensure land use compatibility due to the sites location within a heavy industrial zone, the projects conformance with applic able standards of Title 16 of the Victorv ille Municipal Code including building size an d placement, sufficient access and off-site connections, and the sites location along three Collector Roadways (Cactus Road, Cantina Drive and Mesa Linda Avenue) with direct access to Highway 395; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that the proposed use does not meet the suspension allowances prov ided by Planning Commission Policy PCP-09- 001 or Section 16-5.12.190 of th e Victorville Municipal Code for any unfinished right-of- way improvements and that the suspensi on of any unfinishe d improvements may adversely affect the public’s health, safe ty and welfare; and th erefore required the construction of any unfinished right-of-way improvements as required by the Victorville Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that the pr oposed site plan satisfies the Site Plan Review criteria, pursuant to Section 16-3.01.030(a) of the Victorville Resolution No. 25-015 February 18, 2025
Municipal Code because the project follows the existing contours of the site and does not create significant artificial slopes or introd uce buildings with views that would impact or reduce the privacy of neighboring residents; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that the pr oposed site plan satisfies the Site Plan Review criteria, pursuant to Section 16-3.01.030(b) of the Victorville Municipal Code because the pr oject will include a design theme that coordinates with recently approved industrial developments in the area with screened loading areas, enhanced walls and wrought iron fencing along the site’s frontage, as well as complete roadway improvements along the sites frontage; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that the pr oposed site plan satisfies the Site Plan Review criteria, pursuant to Section 16-3.01.030(c) of the Victorville Municipal Code because the proposal will ensure minimal disruption to surrounding uses since the project site is bound on the north, east and west by proposed public rights-of-way, and adjacent to undeveloped property expected to be developed with similar uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that the pr oposed site plan satisfies the Site Plan Review criteria, pursuant to Section 16-3.01.030(d) & (e) of the Victorville Municipal Code because the develop ment is in general compliance with the applicable development standards, regulations and requirements of Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code the applicable st andards of the Industrial De sign Guidelines including setbacks, lot coverage, parking, landscaping, site design, building design and site access; and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after hearing all arguments for and against the proposal, and after hearing all testimony offered on the 8 th day of January, Resolution No. 25-015 February 18, 2025
2025, adopted Resolution No. P-24-055 in acco rdance with Section 16-3.01.060 of the Victorville Municipal Code, which granted Site Plan Case No. PLAN23-00003 to allow for the development of an approximately 400,000 square foot warehouse distribution building on two vacant M-2 (Heavy Industrial) zoned parcels totaling approximately 18 acres on the hereinabove described property; and
WHEREAS, an appeal application was received on the 15th day of January 2025 from Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance regarding the Planning Commission approval of Planning Case No. PLAN23-00003; and
WHEREAS, the appellant has challenged the entire decision of the Planning Commission, asserting the Commission did not adequately investigate nor mitigate the project and are of the belief the Planning Commission did not fulfill their duty to address the environmental, social, and economic bur dens the project imposes on Victorville residents; and
WHEREAS, an appeal hearing was held before the City Council on the 18th day of February 2025, pursuant to Title 7, Division I, Chapter 4, of the Government Code, State of California, and Section 16-2.02.090 of the Victorville M unicipal Code to hear arguments for and against the appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed all documents constituting the record upon which the Planning Commission’s de cision was made, asse ssed the appellants statements on why they believe an error was made in the Planning Commission’s decision, and heard all public testimony provided during the public hearing; and Resolution No. 25-015 February 18, 2025
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based, shall be located with the City of Victorville Clerk, located at 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, CA; and WHEREAS, City Council finds that the appellant’s position that an error was made in the Planning Commission’s evaluation of the project, the project impacts and the completeness of the environmental review is not supported by evidence sufficient to overturn or modify the Planning Commission’s decision based upon: a determination the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Decl aration adequately address the projects environmental concerns and those impacts that exist have been sufficiently mitigated; compliance with the City’s General Plan and the project not impeding the implementation of the objectives and policies of the Environm ental Justice Element of the General Plan by complying with local air quality management district thresholds thereby not adversely impacting the air quality for a disadvantaged community, furthering community access to bike lanes and future transit corridors by building roadways, inst alling more than one- hundred trees throughout the project thereby improving the tree canopy in the area, and not impeding the future development of healthy food options in the area given the project development conforms with the underlying zoning designation and General Plan; and the project’s anticipated creation of nearly 300 temporary jobs for local skilled workers during construction and in excess of 300 permanent warehouse jobs following completion of the project, aiding in reducing the high unemployment rate of a disadvantaged community.
Resolution No. 25-015 February 18, 2025
NOW, THEREFORE, TH E CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the Planning Commission approved the subject Site Plan in accordance with all applicable Municipa l Code provisions and Planning Commission Policies, and that the determination to approve the project was based upon findings that the City Council does not believe were made in error nor do es the City Council, after a review of the entire record, disagree with t he action taken by the Planning Commission; and
SECTION 2. That the appellant’s reques t to modify the decision of the Planning Commission to grant Site Plan Case No. PLAN23-00003, that included Conditions of Approval and mitigation m easures to ensure the impacts on the environment and community are less than significant on the above-described property, is denied.
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT C
Appeal Application ꢀ -DQXDU\ ꢁꢂꢃ
ꢄꢅꢄꢂ
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT E
Approved Planning Commission Resolution
No. P-24-055
RESOLUTION NO. P-24-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE APPROVING SITE PLAN CASE NO. PLAN23-00003; A SITE PLAN WITH A PROPOSED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROXIMATELY 400,000 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING ON TWO VACANT M-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONED PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 18 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
LOGICAL EXTENSIONS OF CACTUS ROAD AND MESA LINDA AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been received from Steeno Design Studio, Inc. regarding property in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, particularly described as follows:
PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14027, IN THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 196, PAGES 85, 86 AND 87, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 8
th day of January 2025,
pursuant to Title 7, Division I, Chapter 4, of the Government Code, State of California, to hear arguments for and against the issue; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Victorville Planning Department undertook and completed an Initial Study for the project, the result of which was the preparation and circulation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and analysis; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study, supporting documents, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Site Plan have been presented to the Planning Commission, and after review and consideration of the environmental information the P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
Planning Commission found that the proposal will not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Initial Study prepared for the project, including all supporting evidence and comments received, all of which documents are hereby incorporated by reference into this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that all materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based, shall be located with the City of Victorville Clerk, located at 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, CA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the site is adequate in size to accommodate the proposed use along with adequate development standards to ensure land use compatibility due to the sites location within a heavy industrial zone, the projects conformance with applicable standards of Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code including building size and placement, sufficient access and off-site connections, and the sites location along three Collector Roadways (Cactus Road, Cantina Drive and Mesa Linda Avenue) with direct access to Highway 395; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed use does not meet the suspension allowances provided by Planning Commission Policy PCP-09-001 or Section 16-5.12.190 of the Victorville Municipal Code for any unfinished right-of-way improvements and that the suspension of any unfinished improvements may adversely affect the public’s health, safety and welfare; and therefore requires the construction of any unfinished right-of-way improvements as required by the Victorville Municipal Code; and
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed site plan satisfies the Site Plan Review criteria, pursuant to Section 16-3.01.030(a) of the Victorville Municipal Code because the project follows the existing contours of the site and does not create significant artificial slopes or introduce buildings with views that would impact or reduce the privacy of neighboring residents; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed site plan satisfies the Site Plan Review criteria, pursuant to Section 16-3.01.030(b) of the Victorville Municipal Code because the project will include a design theme that coordinates with recently approved industrial developments in the area with screened loading areas, enhanced walls and wrought iron fencing along the site’s frontage, as well as complete roadway improvements along the sites frontage; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed site plan satisfies the Site Plan Review criteria, pursuant to Section 16-3.01.030(c) of the Victorville Municipal Code because the proposal will ensure minimal disruption to surrounding uses since the project site is bound on the north, east and west by proposed public rights-of-way, and adjacent to undeveloped property expected to be developed with similar uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed site plan satisfies the Site Plan Review criteria, pursuant to Section 16-3.01.030(d) & (e) of the Victorville Municipal Code because the development is in general compliance with the applicable development standards, regulations and requirements of Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code the applicable standards of the Industrial Design Guidelines including setbacks, lot coverage, parking, landscaping, site design, building design and site access; and
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission, pursuant to Sections 16-3.01.060 of the Victorville Municipal Code that Site Plan Case No.
PLAN23-00003,
A Site Plan with a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to allow for the development of an approximately 400,000 square foot warehouse distribution building on two vacant M-2 (Heavy Industrial) zoned parcels totaling approximately 18 acres on
the hereinabove described property be granted subject to the following conditions of approval:
Planning Conditions:
1. The site plan approval allows for the development of an approximately 381,198 sq. ft. warehouse and distribution facility that includes 14,933 sq. ft. of ancillary office space, 72 loading docks, 2 grade doors, 92 truck trailer parking spaces, as well as 178 passenger vehicle parking spaces. Associated site improvements such as paving, landscaping, walls, fencing, etc. are also included in the approval as depicted in the approved Site Plan and by Conditions of Approval.
2. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable development standards of Title 16 and shall be in general compliance with the Industrial Design Guidelines.
3. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformity with the plans submitted as part of this application, unless modification is required to comply with the applicable development standards of Title 16 and/or conditions of approval.
4. The development shall be in substantial conformity with the architectural elevations and renderings submitted with this application, unless modification is required by condition.
5. Any change in use or implementation of a new use within the facility, which will require additional parking spaces resulting in noncompliance with the parking standards of Title 16, shall cause that use to be subject to Planning Commission review and approval.
6. The number and location of all handicapped parking spaces shall be subject to Development Department review and approval.
7. All off-street parking spaces and access thereto required by Title 16 shall be provided in accordance with the specifications for standard parking spaces outlined in Title 16.
Parking spaces provided in excess of required parking may be designed in accordance with the specifications for compart parking spaces outlined in Title 16.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
8. Stamped color concrete shall be installed at driveway entrances, ADA path of travel and at the main building entries with the color and design subject to review and approval by the Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of a building permit. The stamped color concrete shall be noted on the approved construction plans accordingly.
9. All proposed signs, including any freestanding signage, shall comply with Title 16.
The applicant shall be required to submit a sign package for review and must gain approval by the Planning Commission prior to approval of any signage proposed which is inconsistent with Title 16. All signs shall be subject to Planning Staff review and approval prior to obtaining a building permit.
10. All proposed temporary signage shall comply with Title 16. All temporary signs (grand openings, special sales, etc.) shall only be affixed to the suite they serve in accordance with an approved Temporary Sign Permit. Flags or other off-site signage is prohibited within multi-tenant developments.
11. A six-inch wide planter curbing, in accordance with Engineering Standard S-09, is required along the perimeter of all landscaped areas, including planters that abut the public right-of-way sidewalk. All planter strips abutting a public right-of-way and planter islands/landscape fingers shall be a minimum interior width of five feet, exclusive of curbing. The grading and site plans shall clearly show all required curbing.
12. The applicant/developer shall provide landscaping/irrigation plans in accordance with Chapter 13.60 of the Victorville Municipal Code, entitled Water Conservation.
Landscape areas shall not exceed a slope of 3:1, unless otherwise approved by the Zoning Administrator and shall also meet Title 16 standards, including the minimum interior percentage of landscaping and the maximum dispersal of landscaping within a parking lot. The landscaping plan shall include a minimum of one 24-inch box tree for every eight parking spaces provided on-site. In addition, the landscaping plan shall include the maximum spacing of all plants as follows:
A. Ground cover – eighteen inches on center
B. One-gallon plants – three feet on center
C. Five-gallon plants – five feet on center
In addition, a note shall be conspicuously placed on the landscape plan indicating the following: Any discrepancy between the maximum spacing criteria and the number of plants shown on the landscape plan shall result in the spacing criteria superseding any other information shown on the landscape plan.
13. All proposed landscaping plant materials shall be listed on the City’s approved water- wise plant list and verified during the building permit plan check. Any plant materials not listed on the approved plant shall be subject to review and approval by the Zoning Administrator to confirm the plant’s ability to survive in the local climate. Additionally, the site shall include rock groundcover throughout all landscaped areas in accordance with the Municipal Code.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
14.All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a neat, clean, orderly and healthful condition. This includes proper pruning, mowing of lawns, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, replacement of plants when necessary and the regular watering of all plants.
In addition, all landscaped areas shall be provided with a suitable permanent water system.
15. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the Applicant/Owner shall submit documentation that demonstrates the site will be regularly maintained by a commercial landscape company or comparable means, subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. The Applicant/Owner shall also include current property management contact information when submitting the documentation.
16. With appropriate application and filing fees to the Planning Department, the applicant shall gain approval of and record a Lot Merger prior to the issuance of a building permit in order to adjust existing lot lines to encompass the boundary of the proposal.
17. The proposed screen wall shall architecturally match the building. The 8-foot-high wrought iron decorative fence shall include decorative pilasters that architecturally match the building at each entrance to the facility at regular intervals at a maximum of 100 feet apart on center. Additionally, the proposed walls and fencing shall be sited in a manner that adequately screens the truck court and loading areas from public view subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator.
18. The applicant shall install trash enclosures in conformance with Section 16-3.24.110 of the Victorville Municipal Code. The enclosure shall have solid block split-face walls or tilt-up walls to match the building, non-transparent metal gates, a solid roof/cover that is architecturally compatible with the primary building(s) onsite and serves to protect the refuse area from inclement weather, as well as wrought iron that fully encloses the trash enclosure between the block wall/metal gates and the roof to prevent unauthorized entry. Additionally, all trash enclosures shall include “walk-in” rear or side access for pedestrian use. The location, design and quantity of said enclosures shall be subject to Planning Staff and Burrtec review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
19. All trash enclosures on site shall provide numerical identification in accordance with Section 16-3.24.110(c)(3) of the Victorville Municipal Code. Details and specifications of required identification subject to review and approval by the Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of a building permit.
20. All light standards (wall and freestanding) shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator prior to building permit issuance and be architecturally compatible with the design of the building. All freestanding light standards shall match and be consistent with lighting utilized throughout the site.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
21. All rooftop and/or ground mounted equipment visible from public right-of-ways shall be screened from view and architecturally integrated into the building.
22.Any wall mounted utility equipment (i.e. meters, panels, boxes, conduit etc.) shall not be visually exposed on the building. This type of equipment shall be internally located, screened with landscaping or covered in a manner that is architecturally integrated into the design of the building, subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator.
23.Roof drains (i.e. scuppers and down spouts) shall not be visually exposed on the building(s). Roof drains shall be internally located, and scuppers screened, subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator.
24.Electrical transformers and associated bollards shall be delineated on the site plan, landscape plan and utility plan. This equipment shall be appropriately screened from view, should not be placed adjacent to public areas and shall not encroach into required planters and/or parking stalls. The location of this equipment shall be subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator and shall correspond with the utility company’s approved location.
25. Prior to the release of any utilities for the use, all Title 16 improvements for the project shall be installed or a bond posted in the amount of one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the value of the uncompleted work shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator, unless otherwise deemed unnecessary by the Zoning Administrator. Any modifications to the amount of the bond shall be su bject to review and ap proval by the Zoning Administrator only if found by the Zo ning Administrator that t here are circumstances unique to the use that is not applicable to other uses.
26. The applicant/developer shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits from any affected regulatory agencies.
27. The handling and disposal of construction and demolition waste for the project shall comply with 6.36.040 of the Victorville Municipal Code. In summary, only the City of Victorville’s employees working in their official capacity and the City’s waste handling contractor, Victorville Disposal (Burrtec Waste), are authorized to provide solid waste handling services from any and all premises in the City; and no person other than those above specified shall provide solid waste handling services, convey or transport any solid waste material in, along or over any public street, alley or highway in the City, with the exception of solid waste removed from any premises by the waste generator, and which is transported personally by such waste generator (or his/her employees) to a processing or disposal facility in a manner consistent with all applicable laws and regulations, utilizing equipment owned and/or leased by the waste generator.
28. The proposed development is required to mitigate its ongoing economic impacts that require the provision of additional municipal services. To mitigate ongoing economic impacts created by new development, the City is preparing to form a Community P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
Facilities District (CFD) to fund the ongoing costs of City services permitted by the CFD, including such services as public safety, street/sidewalk maintenance, and other eligible service impacts. Once formed, the City CFD will have established a uniform, standardized City-wide rate structure that will apply to new developments. If the City forms said CFD prior to the recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit for the proposed development, the Developer shall annex the subject site into the CFD or shall establish a funding mechanism to provide an ongoing source of funds for the additional services comparable to the uniform standardized City-wide rate established in the CFD Resolution and associated Financial Impact Analysis report.
29.The Applicant/Owner shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Victorville, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Victorville or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this approval. The City of Victorville shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and the City of Victorville shall cooperate fully in the defense.
30.The project shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws and policies, including:
the California Government Code (including the Planning, Zoning and Development Laws), Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Subdivision Map Act, International Building Code, Green Code, Fire Code; and, Victorville General Plan and Municipal Code; unless permitted to deviate through provisions of such, or through adopted mitigation measures, conditions of approval, or the plans themselves.
Environmental Conditions:
31.(AIR-1) The Applicant shall prepare and submit to the MDAQMD, prior to commencing earth-moving activity, a dust control plan that describes all applicable dust control measures that will be implemented at the project.
32.(AIR-2) The Applicant shall ensure that signage, compliant with Rule 403 Attachment B, is erected at each project site entrance not later than the commencement of construction.
33.(AIR-3) The Applicant shall ensure the use of a water truck to maintain moist disturbed surfaces and actively spread water during visible dusting episodes to minimize visible fugitive dust emissions. For projects with exposed sand or fines deposits (and for projects that expose such soils through earthmoving), chemical stabilization or covering with a stabilizing layer of gravel will be required to eliminate visible dust/sand from sand/fines deposits.
34.(AIR-4) All perimeter fencing shall be wind fencing or the equivalent, to a minimum of four feet of height or the top of all perimeter fencing. The owner/operator shall maintain the wind fencing as needed to keep it intact and remove windblown fugitive dust. This P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
wind fencing requirement may be superseded by local ordinance, rule or project- specific biological mitigation prohibiting wind fencing.
35.(AIR-5) All maintenance and access vehicular roads and parking areas shall be stabilized with chemical, gravel or asphaltic pavement sufficient to eliminate visible fugitive dust from vehicular travel and wind erosion. Take actions to prevent project- related track out onto paved surfaces and clean any project-related track out within 24 hours. All other earthen surfaces within the project area shall be stabilized by natural or irrigated vegetation, compaction, chemical or other means sufficient to prohibit visible fugitive dust from wind erosion.
36.(BIO-1) Pre-construction surveys for burrowing owls, desert tortoise, and nesting birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Section 3503 of the California Fish and Wildlife Code shall be conducted prior to the commencement of Project-related ground disturbance. a. Appropriate survey methods and timeframes shall be established, to ensure that chances of detecting the target species are maximized. In the event that listed species, such as the desert tortoise, are encountered, authorization from the USFWS and CDFW must be obtained. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance measures shall be implemented to ensure that nests are not disturbed until after young have fledged. b. Pre-construction surveys shall encompass all areas within the potential footprint of disturbance for the project, as well as a reasonable buffer around these areas.
37.(BIO-2) A Protected Plant Plan shall be developed and shall identify methods, locations, and criteria for transplanting those trees that would be removed during Project construction. a. As required by the San Bernardino County Development Code, Joshua trees proposed for removal shall be transplanted or stockpiled for future transplanting wherever possible.
38.(BIO-3) Prior to construction, the project proponent is required to obtain an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) through CDFW for the take of 2 Joshua trees. Per Section 1927.4 of the WJTCA, CDFW may authorize, by permit, the taking of a western Joshua tree if all of the following conditions are met:
a) The permittee submits to CDFW for its approval a census of all western Joshua trees on the project site, including photographs, that categorize the trees according to the following size classes: a. Less than one meter in height. b. One meter or greater but less than five meters in height. c. Five meters or greater in height.
b) The permittee avoids and minimizes impacts to, and the taking of, the western Joshua tree to the maximum extent practicable. Minimization may include trimming, encroachment on root systems, relocation, or other P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
actions that result in detrimental but nonlethal impacts to western Joshua tree.
c) The permittee mitigates all impacts to, and taking of, the western Joshua tree. In lieu of completing the mitigation on its own, the permittee may elect to pay mitigation fees.
d) CDFW may require the permittee to relocate one or more of the western Joshua trees. The City of Victorville falls within an area of the WJTCA which qualifies for reduced Mitigation Fees for impacts to western Joshua trees (Fish and Wildlife Code, Section 1927). The reduced Mitigation Fees are as follows [Fish and Wildlife Code, Section 1927.3 (d)]: 1.Trees 5 meters of greater in height - $1,000; 2. Trees 1 meter or greater but less than 5 meters in height - $200; 3. Trees less than 1 meter in height - $150. Each western Joshua tree stem or trunk arising from the ground shall be considered an individual tree requiring mitigation, regardless of proximity to any other western Joshua tree stem of trunk. Mitigation is required of all trees, regardless of whether they are dead or alive. It is recommended that specific Joshua tree mitigation measures or determination of in-lieu fees be addressed through consultation with CDFW.
39.(CUL-1) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Victorville that a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist has been retained by the Project Applicant to conduct monitoring of excavation activities and has the authority to halt and redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected paleontological resources are unearthed.
40.(CUL-2) Recovered specimens shall be properly prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including screen washing sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates, if necessary. Identification and curation of specimens into a professional, accredited public museum repository with a commitment to archival conservation and permanent retrievable storage, such as the San Bernardino County Museum in San Bernardino, California, is required for significant discoveries.
The archaeologist/paleontologist must have a written repository agreement in hand prior to initiation of mitigation activities.
41.CUL Mitigation #3. A final monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance shall be prepared, including lists of all fossils recovered, if any, and necessary maps and graphics to accurately record the original location of the specimens. The report shall be submitted to the City of Victorville prior to building final.
42.(CUL-4) Prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities, field personnel should be alerted to the possibility of buried prehistoric or historic cultural deposits and paleontological resources. In the event that field personnel encounter buried cultural materials and/or paleontological resources, work in the immediate vicinity of the find P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
should cease and a qualified archaeologist/paleontologists must be retrained to assess the significance of the find. The qualified archaeologist/paleontologist shall have the authority to stop or divert construction excavation as necessary. If the qualified archaeologist/paleontologist finds that any cultural resources present meet eligibility requirements for listing on the California register or the national register of historic places (national register), plans for the treatments, evaluation, and mitigation of impacts to the find will need to be developed. Prehistoric or historic cultural materials that may be encountered during ground-disturbing activities include:
a) Historic-period artifacts such as glass bottles and fragments, cans, nails, ceramic and pottery fragments, and other metal objects; b) Historic-period structural or building foundations, walkways, cisterns, pipes, privies, and other structural elements;
c) Pre-historic flaked-stone artifacts and debitage (waste material), consisting of obsidian, basalt, and/or cryptocrystalline silicates; d) Dark, greasy soil that may be associated with charcoal, ash, bone, shell, flaked stone, ground stone and fire affected rocks; and Human remains.
43.(GEO-1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain coverage under the statewide general NPDES permit for control of construction and post- construction related storm water in accordance with the requirements of the Small MS4 General Permit.
44.(GEO-2) The Applicant shall prepare a project specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required in the NPDES permit and shall identify site- specific erosion and sediment control best management practices that will be implemented; The SWPPP shall be applicable to all areas of the project site including construction areas, access roads to and through the site, and staging and stockpile areas; Temporary best management practices for all components of the project must be implemented until such time as permanent post-construction best management practices are in place and functioning; and all excess sediment excavated as part of the Project that is not used onsite should be stockpiled in a location such that it will not be transported by wind or water into a surface water. An adequate combination of sediment and erosion control BMPs must be implemented and maintained to temporarily stabilize all stockpiled sediment until such time that it is reused and/or permanently stabilized.
45.(GEO-3) The applicant/developer shall prepare and implement a comprehensive Spill Prevention and Response Plan for the Project, subject to review and approval by the City Planner and City Engineer (or their designee) prior to the issuance of any associated building or grading permit. This plan should outline the site-specific monitoring requirements and list the best management practices necessary to prevent P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
hazardous material spills or to contain and cleanup a hazardous material spill, should one occur.
46.(TRA-1) Highway 395 / Mojave Drive: Add exclusive westbound right turn lane; Convert the current shared through-right-turn lane to a through lane only; provide right turn overlap phasing for the westbound and northbound right turns; optimize signal timing.
47.(TRA-2) Mojave Drive / Mesa Linda Avenue: Install traffic signal control with protected left turn phasing on all approaches (To be established by Mojave 68 Project, which has been conditioned to install the traffic signal.)
48.(TRA-3) The projects contribution in the Near-Term is anticipated to be 21.0% and in the Mid-Term is anticipated to be 5.8% of the cost of the improvements to Highway 395 at Mojave Drive. In the event that the Mojave 68 Project is delayed, the project contribution in the Near-Term is anticipated to be 29.7% and in the Mid-Term is anticipated to be 8.1% of the cost of the improvements to Mojave Drive at Mesa Linda Avenue.
49.(TRI-1) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Victorville that a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist has been retained by the Project Applicant to conduct monitoring of excavation activities and has the authority to halt and redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected paleontological resources are unearthed.
50.(TRI-2) The archaeologist/paleontologist monitor shall conduct full-time monitoring during grading and excavation operations in undisturbed, very old alluvial fan sediments at or below four (4) feet below ground surface and shall be equipped to salvage fossils if they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The archaeologist/paleontologist monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow of removal of abundant and large specimens in a timely manner. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units are not present in the subsurface, or if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified archaeologist/paleontologist personnel to have a low potential to contain or yield fossil resources.
51.(TRI-3) Recovered specimens shall be properly prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including screen washing sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates, if necessary. Identification and curation of specimens into a professional, accredited public museum repository with a commitment to archival conservation and permanent retrievable storage, such as the San Bernardino County Museum in San Bernardino, California, is required for significant discoveries.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
The archaeologist/paleontologist must have a written repository agreement in hand prior to initiation of mitigation activities.
52.(TRI-4) A final monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance shall be prepared, including lists of all fossils recovered, if any, and necessary maps and graphics to accurately record the original location of the specimens. The report shall be submitted to the City of Victorville prior to building final.
Engineering Conditions:
53.The developer shall dedicate an easement for public right-of-way to the City of Victorville for the following in accordance with the Circulation Element:
a) An additional 2-feet from the centerline of improvements for Cactus Road for a total of 34-feet.
i. 47-feet from the centerline of improvements for Cactus Road along the stretch of the required right-turn pocket approaching Mesa Linda Ave.
b) An additional 2-feet from the centerline of improvements for Mesa Linda Ave for a total of 34-feet.
c) The corner cut-off/chamfer for Cactus Road and Mesa Linda Ave shall accommodate a 25-foot radius curb return per City Standard S-25 and City standard accessibility ramps per City Standard No. S-11. d) The corner cut-off/chamfer for Cactus Road and Cantina Drive shall accommodate a 25-foot radius curb return per City Standard S-25 and City standard accessibility ramps per City Standard No. S-11.
54.The developer shall request a vacation of the public right-of-way from the City of Victorville’s Engineering Department for the following in accordance with the Circulation Element:
a) 2-feet vacation from the centerline of improvements for Cantina Drive for a total of 30-feet.
b) 30-foot vacation of Acacia Road.
55.The developer shall request a letter of non-interference from the California Electric Corporation for the build-out of Cantina Drive adjacent to the existing easement.
56.The developer shall install all improvements required by Section 9.32.040 of the Victorville Municipal Code (including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, pavement widening, drive approaches, street lighting, and drainage facilities) along the street frontages of the project, in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Improvements of the City of Victorville. The required street improvements include:
a) Construction of Cactus Road to ultimate half-width along the project frontage (inclusion of the dedicated right turn pocket) approaching Mesa Linda Ave. The developer shall install an additional 12-feet (half width +12- P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
feet) of pavement widening, an AC berm, and parkway grading on the opposite side of the street centerline as required by the City Engineer. i. Extension of Cactus Road to connect to the existing westerly pavement limits from the limits of the project frontage. The extension past the project boundary shall have a minimum total pavement width of 26-feet with a 20:1 street taper per City Specifications and Standards.
b) Construction of Mesa Linda Ave to ultimate half-width along the project frontage. The developer shall install an additional 12-feet (half width +12- feet) of pavement widening, an AC berm, and parkway grading on the opposite side of the street centerline as required by the City Engineer. i. Extension of Mesa Linda Ave to connect southerly to Mojave Drive from the limits of the project frontage. The extension past the project boundary shall have a minimum total pavement width of 26-feet with a 20:1 street taper per City Specifications and Standards. c) Construction of Cantina Drive to ultimate half-width along the project frontage. The developer shall install an additional 12-feet (half width +12- feet) of pavement widening, an AC berm, and parkway grading on the opposite side of the street centerline as required by the City Engineer. i. Cantina Drive shall terminate as a cul-de-sac per S-26 or S-27. ii. Cantina Drive shall not extend past 1000-feet in length from the centerline of Cactus Road to the limits of the cul-de-sac as mentioned in sub-comment i.
d) Landscaping parkway improvements along the frontages of the property per City Standards. See City Standard for Landscape, Basin, and Drainage Guidelines.
e) Installation of commercial (decorative marbelite) streetlights along the frontages of the property, per City Standards.
57.Grading plans and Erosion control plans for the subdivision shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and mylar approval by the City Engineer.
58.Street improvement plans for all required curb and gutter, sidewalks, pavement widening, driveway approaches, and cross-gutters, with reference to drainage structures, street lighting, signing & striping, and other roadway improvements within public right-of-way, shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and mylar approval by the City Engineer.
59.Water improvement plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and mylar approval by the City Engineer. If landscaped areas equal or exceeds 1,000 square feet than a separate irrigation with an RP device shall be required. A reduced pressure backflow P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
device per City standard W-39 must be installed behind the domestic water meter serving the site. A Fire Service Reduced Pressure Detector Assembly per City standard W-28 shall be installed on the fire protection service if on-site protection is required. The water improvement plans shall show water service connections and valves. A current water service will serve letter from Victorville Water District is required with the plan submittal. Water service construction shall be subject to the conditions within the will serve letter and the approved Water Feasibility Study including:
a) The construction of a 12-inch water main along the Cactus Road frontage. b) The construction of a 12-inch water main along Cactus Road from the project frontage or westerly boundary to the existing water main, located approximately 415-feet easterly from US Highway 395.
c) The construction of a 12-inch water main on Mesa Linda Avenue frontage. d) The construction of a 12-inch water main on Mesa Linda Avenue to Mojave Drive.
60.Sewer improvement plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and mylar approval by the City Engineer. This project requires a connection to the City’s sewage collection system. All improvements shall be installed by the developer in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Improvements of the City of Victorville. Per the approved sewer feasibility study, the developer shall construct:
a) A 10-inch sanitary sewer along Cactus Road to the existing sewer located on Tawney Ridge Lane.
61.Signing and Striping improvement plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil/Traffic Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and mylar approval by the City Engineer.
62.Streetlight improvement plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and mylar approval by the City Engineer.
63.Landscape and irrigation improvement plan shall be submitted to Development Engineering for review and mylar approval by the City Engineer.
64.A final hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and approval by the City Engineer. The developer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations to size any drainage structures and facilities included in all the improvement plans. The study shall identify both on and off-site flows including an analysis of all recommended drainage structures and facilities included within the improvement plans to mitigate stormwater flows.
65.A final geotechnical report shall be prepared by a licensed Civil/Geotechnical Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and approval by the City Engineer.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
66.A final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the subdivision for the on-site post-construction BMPs for treatment of storm water run-off, along with a WQMP exhibit, shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer per City Standards and submitted to Development Engineering for review and approval by the City Engineer.
67.The site shall be designed and permanent drainage detention facilities installed such that post-development peak storm water runoff discharge rates shall not exceed the estimated pre-development rate where the increase peak storm water discharge rate will result in increased potential for downstream erosion, and to mitigate potential water quality impacts related to stormwater. A flood control water quality retention/detention improvement plan prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer detailing all proposed mitigatory measures/infrastructure shall be prepared and submitted to Development Engineering for review and approval by the City Engineer in accordance with the approved WQMP and final hydrology study.
68.The developer shall provide a fair-share contribution of 29.7% for the installation of a future traffic signal at the intersection of Mojave Dr at Mesa Linda Ave per the approved traffic study. Currently, the City estimates the cost of the future signal to be $900,000 but reserves the right to adjust the estimate at the time the tract is developed.
a) Cost sharing shall vary contingent upon the build-out of the Mojave 68 Project.
69.The developer shall provide a fair-share contribution of 21% for road improvements along Mojave Drive approaching the intersection of Mojave Dr at US-395 per the approved traffic study. Fair-share contribution for the road improvements include, but are not limited to:
a) Addition of an exclusive westbound right-turn lane along Mojave Drive, approaching US-395.
b) Conversion of the existing shared thru-lane and right-turn lane to accommodate an exclusive westbound thru-lane along Mojave Drive, approaching US-395.
c) Coordination with Caltrans to optimize signal timing with the inclusion of right-turn overlap phasing for the westbound and northbound right-turns.
70.A permit issued from the City’s Engineering Department is required prior to commencement of any work performed within public right-of-way and the City’s inspection process followed for the connection to and construction of any facilities that are to be dedicated to, owned and maintained by the City.
71.An application for plan review and an engineer’s construction cost estimate for civil improvements shall be required at the time of initial improvement plan submittal.
Payment of plan and map check fees as per the City’s Development Department Engineering Plan Check Fee Schedule based on the engineer’s cost estimate shall be required with the plan submittal.
72.A current water service will serve letter from Victorville Water District is required with the plan submittal.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
a) Developer shall apply for two separate water (EWTR) permits:
i. Water Meter Installation(s) Permit
ii. RP/RPDA Installation & Testing Permit.
73.The site and public walkways shall be designed and constructed for accessibility in compliance with the guidelines of the Americans with Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design and the Standard Specifications for Public Improvements of the City of Victorville.
74.The project property owner shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City for the water quality management plan.
75.The developer shall be responsible for all costs (including application, design, and construction fees) incurred due to the relocation of existing utility facilities where such facilities conflict with the improvements associated with this project.
76.The developer shall pay any and all fees and charges that may become effective prior to the issuance of a building permit or utility connection and shall pay such fees as a condition of obtaining a building permit.
77.Prior to construction of any improvements or any land disturbance, the developer shall construct temporary drainage facilities and provide erosion control measures as necessary to minimize storm water run-off, erosion, and silt deposition. The developer shall provide an erosion control plan of the Best Management Practices to be implemented during construction. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit program requires operators of construction sites one acre or larger (including smaller sites that are part of a larger common plan of development) to obtain an NPDES permit and prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the SWPPP, and an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Development Department. All NPDES guidelines must be adhered to, and best management practices followed at all times during construction.
78.In accordance with State Water Quality Resources Board requirements, the developer shall implement measures for site design, source control, run-off reduction, storm water treatment and baseline hydro modification as defined by the Phase II Small MS4 Permit. This includes measures installed such that post-development peak storm water runoff discharge rates do not exceed the estimated pre-development rate, and on-site post-construction BMPs for treatment of storm water run-off.
79.A boundary survey or corner record must be performed, and property corners verified prior to construction to facilitate the placement of improvements per plan direction.
The developer’s engineer shall provide a horizontal control plan to the City for review or provide adequate control/dimensioning on the site/grading plan.
80.The developer shall establish a new commercial Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD), or other mechanism as determined by the City, for the perpetual maintenance for the required parkway landscaping and irrigation improvements.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
81.The developer shall annex into a new commercial Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD), or other mechanism as determined by the City, for the perpetual maintenance for the required parkway landscaping and irrigation improvements.
82.Prior to the issuance of permits, the developer shall enter into an Improvement Agreement for the completion of all public improvements as required by Section
9.32.040 of the Victorville Municipal Code. The improvement agreement shall be secured by one of the forms specified by Section 17.64.060 of the Victorville Municipal Code.
83.Grading operations and construction shall be conducted in a manner and/or measures taken to prevent sand, dust, and debris to blow onto other properties. An adequate dust palliative shall be used at all times. After completion of grading the developer shall maintain the site such that sand, dust and debris do not blow onto other properties.
84.Temporary fencing shall be erected as required by City staff during construction to prevent windblown debris from leaving the project site and to ensure public safety.
85.The developer shall comply with Section 16-5.12.170 of the Victorville Municipal Code regarding the undergrounding of any existing above ground utilities on-site, along property lines, and street frontages. Overhead electrical utilities shall be relocated and placed underground prior to occupancy.
86.All public utility distribution lines, including service lines to the site, shall be installed by the developer.
87.The method of installation (trenching or boring) for connections to existing utilities (sewer, water, storm drain, etc.) within paved streets shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer.
88.On-site drainage to streets shall be conveyed through parkway drains or as approved by the City Engineer.
89.Landscaping within the traffic sighting distance triangle at intersections and driveway connections to public streets shall be limited to ground cover only and shall not include shrubs and trees.
Building Conditions:
90.The project shall comply with all building codes in effect at the time of plan submittal.
91.The scope of work indicated will require full accessibility to be included in accordance with Section 11B-202 of the California Building Code.
92.The project will require a connection to the City’s public sewer system.
93.Plan check fees for this project will be due, and shall be paid in full, upon submittal of plans to the Building Division. The Building Division may be contacted at (760) 955- P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
5100 for an estimation of these fees. Tools for estimating total permit fees are available on the City’s website at https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/city- departments/development/permit-center/fees-forms. Actual amounts owed will be determined upon submittal of the plans via the City’s online permit center.
Fire Conditions:
94.Shall comply with all 2022 Building and Fire Code requirements based on occupancy classification.
95.A written Fire Protection Plan shall be developed for significant or complex construction projects at the discretion of the Fire Code Official. The plan shall be approved by the Fire Code Official prior to proceeding past foundation work for new buildings or commencement of demolition work in alteration projects. The written plan shall be consistent with the fire safety precautions as specified in this Standard. The general contractor is responsible for carrying out the provisions of the Fire Protection Plan and communicating it to all subcontractors. The Fire Protection Plan shall include the following:
a. Procedures for reporting emergencies to the Fire department. b. Procedures for emergency notification, evacuation and/or relocation of all persons in the building under construction and on the site. c. Procedures for hot work operations, management of hazardous materials and removal of combustible debris and maintenance of emergency access roads.
d. Floor plans identifying the locations of exits, exit stairs, exit routes and portable fire extinguishers.
e. Site plans identifying the designated exterior assembly areas for each evacuation route.
f. Site plans identifying required fire apparatus roadways and on-site fire hydrants.
g. The name and contact phone number of the person(s) responsible for compliance with the Fire Protection Plan.
96.Monitored fire sprinkler system(s) are required for the proposed building(s). Plans shall be submitted prior to construction and permit shall be applied for prior to construction.
97.Monitored fire alarm system(s) are required for proposed building(s). Plans shall be submitted prior to construction and permit shall be applied for prior to construction.
98.Monitored fire pump may be required for proposed building(s) based upon fire flow.
Plans shall be submitted prior to construction and permit shall be applied for prior to construction.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
99.Smoke control system(s) with addressable duct detection are required for proposed building(s). Plans shall be submitted prior to construction. 100. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage system(s) are required for proposed building(s). Plans shall be submitted prior to construction and permit shall be applied for prior to construction.
101. Fire Command center/Room is required for the proposed building(s). Plans shall be submitted prior to construction designating location and component features to be installed within.
102. Paved access from 2 points shall be required for completion and occupancy. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction commencement. The fire code official is authorized to require more than two means of fire access based on the potential for impairment of roadways by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. 103. Fire apparatus access road(s) over bridges, elevated surfaces, and natural drainage course shall comply with Engineering Standards (See Standard Number D- 01A) and CFC 2022 503.2.6.
104. Interior/exterior Fire Department access roadways/fire lanes shall be required per Fire Department Standard. Fire Department access roadways providing access to the buildings in this project shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide and shall be directly adjacent to 2 sides of the building. If gates, installed must comply with Fire Department Standards. Fire lanes shall be designated and marked adjacent to all multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial building access points and approaches. 105. All fire apparatus access roads shall be identified by at least one of the following methods:
a) Approved signs (See Standard Number A-2)
b) Approved red curbs (See Standard Number A-2)
c) Approved pavement stripping (See Standard Number A-2) 106. An approved on-site fire protection system, in accordance with Fire and Water Department Standards is required. The system is required to be in place and serviceable prior to building construction.
107. Provide a preliminary on-site fire protection plan which indicates the location of all required fire protection appliances (FDC’s, PIV’s, RP’s, hydrants, etc.) Required appliances shall be unobstructed by fencing, storage containers, vegetation, parked vehicles, etc.
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
108. An approved water supply system, complete with street hydrants complying with Fire Department Standards, shall be in place prior to any combustible construction. 109. Required fire flow for this project is 4,000gpm @ 20psi for 4 hours duration at furthest remote hydrant. Contact Water Department to assure availability of required fire flow.
110. Fire Department access roadways greater than 150’ in length shall require approved turnarounds per Fire Department Standard. Any street exceeding 600; will require secondary access.
111. Knox Box/Key Box is required and shall be provided and installed in accordance with Fire Department Standards.
112. Access gates shall be provided with an “Opticom” receiver capable of opening gates via decoding of the “Opticom” strobe signal transmitted by Fire, Police, and Ambulance units. All access gates shall require mechanical means for opening in event of power failure, shall not impinge on required clear width when fully open, and shall be equipped with Knox Box lock actuation devices. 113. Street Addressing for Commercial, Condominiums and Industrial Buildings h. The street address shall be posted with a minimum of twelve (12) inch in height numbers with a one (1) inch stroke, visible from the street of the corresponding address. During the hours of darkness, they shall be electrically illuminated either externally or internally. i. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be legible from the street of the corresponding address prior to occupancy. j. Where building setbacks exceed one hundred (100) feet from roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting numbers twelve (12) inch in height with a one (1) inch stroke, shall be displayed at property access entrance on a permanent monument.
k. Commercial/Industrial buildings - Secondary or rear entrance doors shall be marked with unit designators with a minimum of four (4) inch high and 3/8- inch stroke numbers/letters and with reflective coating. l. Commercial/Industrial buildings – Bay doors/ dock doors with identifying numbers or letters shall have both exterior and interior designators visible. m. In multifamily complex there shall be positioned at each entrance of the complex, an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the complex showing the location of fire hydrants, egress/ingress, building and unit designators within the complex
P-24-055 – PLAN23-00003 January 8, 2025
n. Where interior buildings exist, completely detached from roadway circulation, illuminated or reflector signs shall be posted along walkway entrances from road circulation points, indicating interior buildings that take access from that particular path.
i. Each individual unit/building within the complex shall display a prominent identification letter, not less than six (6) inches in height and on-half (1/2) inch stroke, which is easily visible to approaching vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic. During the hours of darkness, these letters shall be internally or externally electrically illuminated. ii. Each individual unit shall have a number/letter with the first digit indicating floor level, not less than four (4) inches in height and one- half (1/2) inch stroke.
Item Number: 2
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing(s)
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Alex Jauregui, City Planner
Subject:
An Amendment to the Victorville Municipal Code with an Environmental Exemption to make various changes Citywide to Title 16 including but not limited to new and updated definitions, new land use allowances and standards related to thrift retail stores, revised landscape standards, and an update and clarification to tentative tract map approval periods
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and take the following actions:
(1) Find the Code Amendment exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
(2) Introduce Ordinance No. 2454 for adoption, and first reading by title only, to amend Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code; and
(3) Waive a further reading in full of proposed Ordinance No. 2454.
Fiscal Impact:
Changes to a land use regulatory document do not result in a direct fiscal impact; however, the extended time allowance to record approved tentative tract maps included in this proposal will result in increased development impact fee collection and property tax revenue for the City as new housing development occurs.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Approval of Ordinance No. 2454 to allow for an amendment to Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code will enable the City to further fulfill the following Goals outlined in the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan:
•Goal C (Community and Economic Development) – The proposed Victorville Municipal Code amendment includes clarified landscaping standards and allowances 4 0
0 7
to extend the approval period of single-family housing projects as well as allow a greater variety of retail uses in commercial zones. These proposed changes will assist the City in attracting new businesses to the community and support the economic vitality and preservation of the community as outlined in the Strategic Plan. •Goal E (Invest in Infrastructure) – With the proposed amendments inclusion of extended approval periods for single-family housing projects, the possibility of associated roadway improvements is also extended, providing additional time for developers to complete roadway upgrades that may have otherwise been delayed or uncompleted.
Background:
On January 8, 2025, during a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission by a vote of 5-0 recommended approval of Victorville Municipal Code Amendment Case No.
PLAN24-00023 (Attachment A). The subject amendment has been recommended for adoption in order to address recent State Assembly and Senate Bills that address allowances for the approval period of Tentative Tract Maps as well as the permitted operation of retail thrift stores. Additionally, amendments to the Victorville Municipal Code (VMC) were recommended for adoption that will revise and update landscape standards for single-family residences and commercial/industrial developments, in an effort to memorialize allowances frequently implemented by the Planning Commission as well as provide the City’s Code Enforcement staff with clarification on required landscape improvements within single-family residential development.
Discussion:
Proposed Code Amendment Summary
The proposed Code Amendment discussed herein generally includes updates to land use allowances, extended approval periods for tentative tract map developments, and updates/clarification to landscape standards. These amendments are briefly described as follows:
•Added allowances for the permitted use of all commercially zoned development by “thrift retail stores” in accordance with requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 2632 (Attachment B). Prior to AB 2632 standards, retail thrift stores were only allowable in C-1 (Neighborhood Service) commercial zones and were prohibited in regional C-2 (General Commercial) zones.
o Associated operating standards are also proposed in order to ensure that the commercial nature of C-2 zones is not adversely impacted. •Coordinated landscape standards for all commercial and industrial development to ensure minimum standards on plant and groundcover type, size, quantity, and design is consistent.
•Clarified landscape standards for single-family residential zones to assist the City’s Code Enforcement Department in applying landscape standards throughout the City.
These clarifications are based on lot size and construction dates of homes, which 4 0
0 7
generally corelates to the application of standards that were applicable when the home was originally developed while still requiring some type of landscaping for homes zoned for less than ½ acre in size. This update also maintains allowances for properties zoned for larger than ½ acre in size (or larger than ½ acre in size within Initiative Areas) to be exempt from installing front yard landscaping provided they did not install compliant landscaping during initial development, with these areas noted in the attached “Existing Non-Small Tract Lots” map (Attachment C). •Updated initial approval period of tentative tract maps from three (3) years initially to four (4) years in accordance with Senate Bill 9 allowances (Attachment B) and as outlined in the Housing Element of the General Plan in an effort to promote housing development.
Proposed Code Amendment Analysis
A description of the proposed code amendments included in this proposal are discussed herein. The proposed changes and a brief description of their purpose are referenced below using their “Chapter” & “Article” positions within Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code (also known as the “Development Code”).
Chapter 1 – Development Department
Article 3: - Definitions
•Updated the definition of “decorative rock” to exclude sand as an acceptable form of groundcover given concerns with durability and ability to remain in position in the local climate.
•Updated the definition of landscape “groundcover” to clarify the necessary depth of rock groundcover and coordinate with existing standards outlined in the Commercial Design Guidelines.
•Added a definition of a “thrift retail store” to match the definition provided within State Assembly Bill 2632.
Chapter 3 – Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 7: - Land Use and Special Requirements
•Added “thrift retail store” as a permitted use within the Neighborhood Service (C-1), General Commercial (C-2), and Health & Wellness Overlay (HWO) zone districts in compliance with Assembly Bill 2632, which requires that local jurisdictions allow such uses anywhere that the sale of similar new merchandise is permitted (excluding large household appliances, vehicles, or anything automobile related). •Added operating standards for “thrift retail stores” in compliance with the allowances provided by Assembly Bill 2632, which permits local jurisdictions regulation of business operations related to donation drop off locations and times, area of establishments dedicated to donation acceptance/processing, as well as enforcement of health and safety issues such as emergency egress and illegal dumping. As 4 0
0 7
proposed, these additional requirements are aimed at preventing potential adverse impacts to commercial districts while complying with Assembly Bill 2632.
Chapter 3 – Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 10: - Commercial Districts
•Updates landscape standards to require:
oEnhanced landscaping at project frontages;
oA minimum of three (3) decorative rock size/types for groundcover areas; and oThe prohibition of bark or wood mulch to be used as a permanent or primary form of groundcover.
These changes are proposed to codify standards that have historically been required by the Commercial Design Guidelines but necessitated clarification to ensure inclusion in all new commercial development.
Chapter 3 – Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 11: - Industrial Districts
•Updates landscape standards to require:
oEnhanced landscaping at project frontages and area visible from public view; oA minimum of three decorative rock size/types and depth of 3” for groundcover areas; and
oThe prohibition of bark or wood mulch to be used as a permanent or primary form of groundcover.
These changes are proposed to codify standards that have historically been required by the Commercial Design Guidelines but not clearly defined within the Industrial Design Guidelines and necessitated clarification to ensure inclusion in all new industrial development.
Chapter 3 – Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 24: - General Development Requirements and Exceptions •Clarifies the applicability of the various front yard landscape standards related to single-family residences that have been adopted over time. Previous standards for small tract lots (e.g. lots zoned for less than ½ acre in size) range from no required front yard landscaping prior to 2007, limited standards from 2007-2015 that only required 50% of front yards to be landscaped, and the current landscape standards from 2015 to current that address specific amounts of plant material, sizes, and multiple types of groundcover. As proposed, these amendments will enable the City’s Code Enforcement Department to clearly implement City landscape requirements on existing single-family residences as follows:
4 0
0 7
o2015 – Current: Homes with building permits issued beginning in 2015 through today are required to comply with all current standards relating to the installation of trees, shrubs, groundcover, as well as landscaped areas that are not permitted to include more than 50% of decorative rock.
oPrior to 2015: Homes completed prior to 2015 are required to at least provide plant material that will cover 25% of the front yard area at maturity with decorative rock allowed to be exposed, or not covered, with plant material within 75% of the front yard.
o½ Acre & Larger Lots: Homes located on property that is zoned for ½ acre in size or larger (or on a ½ or larger size lot within an Initiative Area) will be permitted to maintain front yards without landscaping if they were originally developed as such.
However, single-family dwellings on these lots developed with landscaping that was included in an associated entitlement will be required to maintain the originally approved landscaping in accordance with the Single-family Design Guidelines. •Added minimum decorative rock variety and sizes to multi-family landscape standards to coordinate with single-family, commercial, and industrial standards while also expressly prohibiting exposed dirt.
•Clarified requirements for planter width when vehicle parking is designed to overhang into planter areas.
Chapter 4 – Subdivision Regulations (Private Development) Article 2: - Tentative Maps
•With the adoption of Senate Bill 9 in 2021, the State authorized local jurisdictions to extend the initial approval period of tentative maps from 36 months to 48 months.
Inasmuch as the City has historically supported new housing development and because the City’s Housing Element of the General Plan seeks to promote new housing within the City, staff finds this allowance appropriate as it will provide additional time for landowners to record final maps and develop housing. Additionally, City staff finds that this allowance should be implemented retroactively and has included a list of previously approved tentative tract maps that will benefit from this extended expiration date if approved (Attachment D).
oAssembly Bill (AB) 2729 (Attachment B) requires local jurisdictions to automatically extend tentative tract maps by 18 months in certain circumstances, with the subject 18-month extension applicable to entitlements that were active as of January 1, 2024, and would have otherwise expired prior to December 31, 2025. Therefore, the noted list clarifies the time extension applicable to each tentative tract map taking advantage of the implementation method that would provide the longest time extension.
•While the Subdivision Map Act notes that a “timely filing” of a tentative map filed with the City will extend the life of a tentative map to allow for its recordation, no definition of a “timely filing” is provided and the City’s current definition of such requires 4 0
0 7
clarification to ensure that the allowance for a “timely filing” is only used when maps are in a position to record. Additionally, this revision has been requested by the City Engineer for clarity.
Staff notes that the VMC amendments included in this proposal will ensure compliance with recent State mandates, promote housing development, ensure clarity in the City’s enforcement of landscape standards and provide aesthetic enhancements to landscaping throughout the City.
Attachments: A. Draft Ordinance No. 2454
B. Applicable State Bills
C. Existing Non-Small Tract Lots
D. Eligible Tract Maps List
E. Background Information – January 8, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT A
Draft Ordinance No. 2454
ORDINANCE NO. 2454
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE APPROVING AMENDMENT CASE PLAN24-00023, AN AMENDMENT TO THE VICTORVILLE MUNICIPAL
CODE WITH AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION TO MAKE VARIOUS CHANGES CITYWIDE TO TITLE 16 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO NEW AND UPDATED DEFINITIONS, NEW
LAND USE ALLOWANCES AND STANDARDS RELATED TO THRIFT RETAIL STORES,
REVISED LANDSCAPE STANDARDS, AND AN UPDATE AND CLARIFICATION TO
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPROVAL PERIODS
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City of Victorville (City”) is authorized to make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4, Article 2, Section 65850 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City may adopt by ordinance regulations affecting: the use of buildings, structures and land; the location, height, bulk, and size of buildings and structures; the size of lots, yards, courts and other open spaces; and the intensity of land use; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4, Article 2, Section 65850 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City has adopted Title 16, Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 16-2.01.010 of the Victorville Municipal Code, providing the authority to amend Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code and the various regulations, requirements, exceptions and guidelines located therein; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4, Article 2, Section 65860 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City of Victorville Zoning Ordinance shall be amended to be consistent with the General Plan within reasonable time; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 16-2.01.020 of the Victorville Municipal Code, the City of Victorville Planning Department has initiated an amendment to the Victorville Municipal Code in order to modify Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code (the “Development Code”) in a manner consistent with State law and the Housing Element of the General Plan by updating land use allowances regarding retail thrift stores, increasing approval periods associated with tentative tract map approvals, updating and clarifying landscap ing standards and making other associated adjustments to the Development Code; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4, Article 2 of the Government Code, State of California and Section 16 -2.01.040 of a Victorville Municipal Code, the Victorville
Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 8th, 2025, to hear arguments for and against the proposed amendments to the Development Code and; after hearing all testimony offered; the Victorville Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P -25-006, which recommended to the City Council the adoption of Municipal Code amendments specified in Planning Case No. PLAN24-00023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed Development Code amendments relating to thrift retail stores, landscaping, and tentative map approval periods will result in a more aesthetically pleasing community with more uniform and easily enforceable regulations, and will promote housing by allowing longer approval periods to facilitate housing development; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed amendments relating to thrift retail stores are necessary updates to bring the City’s Zoning Ordinance into conformance with new state laws, and that the amendments will work to prevent adverse impacts to General Commercial Zones by instituting regulations associated with donation drop off locations and times, area of establishments dedicated to donation acceptance/processing, as well as enforcement of health and safety issues such as emergency egress and illegal dumping, which are permitted by state law; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed amendments relating to landscaping are necessary to clarify enforceable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance given the varying landscape standards adopted by the City of Victorville over time, and that the amendment will result in aesthetic improvements to the community and new development as mandated by the various development standards and design guidelines included in the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed amendments relating to the extension of tentative map approval periods promote housing development and are compliant with the Housing Element of the General Plan and assist in working towards meeting the City’s regional housing needs allocation, and that application retroactively to recently approved tentative maps is appropriate for the reasons stated above; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that multiple definitions and standards will be updated with these amendments, which is pertinent in order to provide a Development Code that is clear, enforceable, and readable by the public and City staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds on their own independent judgment that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based upon CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), as there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment inasmuch as the proposed amendment : is aimed at improving and
enhancing landscaping in accordance with the City’s water efficient landscaping ordi nance; will bring the Victorville Municipal Code into conformance with existing State law regarding thrift retail stores, which are required to be permitted anywhere similar new merchandise is permitted ; and will increase approval periods to promote housing development within the City, which is constantly working to meet is regional housing needs allocation as outlined in the Housing Element of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Title 7, Division I, Chapter 4, Article 2 of the Government Code of the State of California and Section 16-2.01.060 of the Victorville Municipal Code, a duly noticed Public Hearing was held by the City Council on the 18th day of February, 2025 to hear arguments for and against the code amendments, and after hearing all verbal and written testimony offered, including the Planning Commission’s recommendation and minutes, and after thoroughly reviewing and considering the code amendments, the City Council approved the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the re maining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this ordinance as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals
The recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in their entirety.
Section 2. Certification
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published according to law.
Section 3. Retroactive Tentative Tract Map Approval Periods Previously approved Tentative Tract Maps that would be extended to become or remain active as a result of an initial 48 month approved period included in this amendment are hereby retroactively provided this extension, as outlined in Exhibit “A”.
Section 5. Additions, Deletions, and Revisions of Various Sections of Title 16 to the Victorville Municipal Code
Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code is hereby amended as described within Exhibit “B” (with included legend defining editing notes as well as existing, new, and deleted text by means of underscores, strikethroughs, and italicization for reference only).
Exhibit “A”
Table 7-1 Permitted, Conditional, Accessory and Temporary Land Uses - All Zoning Districts
USE
ZONE
AE A SR R1 R2 R3 R4 MDR RMPD C1 C2/C4 CA CM IPD M1 M2 PC HWO 23) RETAIL
Building materials - - - - - - - - - C C - - P P P - C
Equipment sales &
rental - - - - - - - - - C C C P C C C - C
Galleria P P
Guns &
ammunition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C C - -
Indoor/outdoor
swap meet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
New General
Merchandise - - - - - - - - - P P - - - - - - P
Used General
Merchandise - - - - - - - - - P - - - - - - - -
Thrift Retail Store P P P
Wholesale
establishment - - - - - - - - - C C - - P P P - C
{Editing Note: Excerpt of Table 7-1 only, all other portions of Section 16-3.07.010 and Table 7-1 to remain as currently written}
Sec. 16-3.07.020: Special requirements for certain permitted and conditional uses (k) Thrift retail stores
(1) Thrift retail stores shall be subject to the following operating requirements:
i. The drop off and receipt of donations shall only take place during business hours and must be physically accepted by an employee, unattended drop-off donations or the use of donation drop boxes are prohibited.
ii. The business shall install and maintain signage that identifies where donations are accepted onsite and stipulates that donation drop -offs are prohibited during non - business hours.
iii. Donations must be accepted only at designated receiving areas at the rear of buildings screened from the public right -of-way, if designed with service door access and parking/unloading areas that do not impede emergency access; alternatively should a donation area visible from the right -of-way be the only feasible means based on building design, a donation acceptance area shall be provided within the building; and all donations shall only be accepted within the enclosed building. iv. Donation sites and receiving areas shall be kept clear at all times and regularly cleaned, at no time shall trash or debris be allowed to collect at the donation site.
Outdoor storage of used or donated goods or associated collection/processing apparatus is prohibited.
v. Operation of any equipment utilized to collect or process used or donated good shall take place only within an enclosed area of the building and no exterior evidence of equipment shall be permitted without being screened from public view, as approved by the Zoning Administrator in accordance with the Commercial Design Guidelines. vi. The disposal of any used or donated goods shall be conducted in conformance with the guidelines of the City’s waste purveyor, including but not limited to compliance with any material recycling standards.
vii. Thrift retail stores shall operate primarily in a retail capacity, maintaining the display of products for sale on racks, shelving and display areas, at no time shall the donation and receiving area exceed twenty (20) percent of the overall floor area.
{Editing Note: Sec. 16-3.07.020 only, all other sections to remain as currently written}
Chapter 3: Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 10: Commercial Districts
Sec. 16-3.10.060: Design guidelines
(b) Site Planning and Design. Site planning refers to the arrangement of buildings and parking areas, the size and location of pedestrian spaces and landscaping, and how these features relate to one another. Site design addresses the scale and size of outdoor spaces, spaces between buildings and parking areas and the relationship of site elements that create a comfortable pedestri an environment.
(9) Landscaping. Landscaping within commercial developments shall create a sense of place by establishing a unique and inviting frontage design that incorporates landscape design elements, varying rock sizes and dense plantings that are unique to the project frontage and shall conform to Section 13.60 of the Victorville Municipal Code while incorporating Water Conservation Ordinance 2114 and should incorporate the following design standards:
This formal planting area helps to create a visually stimulating landscape.
i. Native and low water use plants shall be used in developing the landscaping palette for a project (City Ordinance 2114).
ii. Landscaping should consist of 24-inch, 36-inch and 48-inch box trees (15-gallon size in slopes), 5 and 15-gallon shrubs, and ground cover.
iii. Exposed dirt is prohibited.
iv. Bark or wood mulch is Wood chips are prohibited as a permanent and primary form of ground cover.
v. Decorative rock, with a minimum variety of three sizes/types, shall be used to cover areas that are not completely covered by plant material. Decorative rock shall not cover more than 25% of a planter area and shall have 3" base with weed barrier. Rock size should exceed three-quarter inch.
vi. A six-inch wide planter curbing is required along the perimeter of all landscaped areas. vii. All planter strips abutting a public right-of-way shall be a minimum of five feet in width and include six inch wide curbing abutting the required planter strip. viii. Where possible, infill projects should connect with adjacent landscaping by using similar plant types, sizes and arrangements.
ix. Landscaping should occur around the entire base of the building to soften the edge between the parking lot and the structure. This should be accented at entrances to provide focus.
x. Provide special landscaping treatments such as intensifying density (size and/or number) of trees and accent trees at all project entries. xi. Trees and shrubs should be located and spaced to allow for mature and long -term growth. Trees and shrubs should provide minimal root problems. xii. Formal planting designs and color-spots are encouraged in courtyards, plazas and in tree wells along the street frontages.
xiii. Planting should be used to screen less desirable areas from public view, i.e., trash enclosures, parking areas, storage areas, loading areas and public utilities. Use evergreen trees to screen unsightly features on-site or off-site. (10) Parking Lot Area Planting. Landscaping within parking lots should be given special consideration. These guidelines should provide a parking lot designer with the direction needed to create a functional and attractive parking environment.
i. Appropriate lighting and landscaping should be provided, including shade trees and lampposts style (Refer to lighting Section of these Guidelines). ii. Areas not used for vehicle parking or maneuvering, or for the movement of pedestrians to and from vehicles should be used for landscaping.
iii. Trees should be distributed throughout the parking lot so as to maximize the aesthetic effect and compatibility with adjoining uses.
iv. Trees should be located throughout a parking lot and not merely at the ends of parking rows. Trees should be sized at 24-inch box or larger at the time of installation so as to provide shade to parked cars and add aesthetic appeal to the project. v. Planter islands and landscape fingers should have a minimum interior dimension of five (5) feet and should be located throughout the parking lot and at the end of all parking rows.
vi. Where parking spaces or drive aisles abut an interior lot line, a landscaped planter strip should be installed.
vii. Trash enclosures and loading areas provided in the parking areas shall be screened with landscaping and wall materials.
viii. Trash enclosures should be separated from adjacent parking stalls by minimum 3-foot wide planters with low -growing plant materials to ensure that adequate space is available for passengers to access a vehicle in an adjacent parking space.
{Editing Note: Sec. 16-3.10.060(b)(9) & (10) only,
all other sections to remain as currently written}
Chapter 3: Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 11: Industrial Districts
Sec. 16-3.11.060: Design guidelines
(b) Site Planning and Design. Quality industrial site design should include controlled site access, service and loading areas located at the sides and rear of buildings, convenient access, visitor parking and on -site circulation, screening of outdoor storage, work areas, and equipment, emphasis on the main building entry and landscaping and landscaped open space.
(7) Landscaping
(i) Landscaping should be used to define areas by helping to focus on entrances to buildings, parking lots, and loading areas as well as defining the edges of various land uses, providing transition between neighboring properties (buffering), and providing screening for outdoor storage, loading and equipment areas. Enhanced planting, such as larger mature plants and/or closer spacing of plants, should be provided in areas highly visible from public views.
(ii) Native and low water use plants shall be used in developing the landscaping palette for a project (City Ordinance 2114).
(iii) Landscaping should consist of 24-inch, 36-inch and 48-inch box trees (15-gallon size in slopes), 5 and 15-gallon shrubs, and ground cover.
(iv) Exposed dirt is prohibited.
(v) Bark or wood mulch is Wood chips are prohibited as a permanent form of ground cover.
(vi) Decorative rock, with a minimum variety of three sizes/types, shall should be used to cover areas that are not completely covered by plant material. Exposed decorative rock shall not cover more than 25% of a planter area and shall have 3" base with weed barrier.
(vii) A six-inch wide planter curbing is required along the perimeter of all landscaped areas. (viii) All planter strips abutting a public right -of-way shall be a minimum of five feet in width and include six inch wide curbing abutting the required planter strip. (ix) Landscaping should be in scale with adjacent buildings and be of appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended goals.
Accent planting enhances building entries.
(x) Use of vines on walls is appropriate in industrial areas because such walls often tend to be large and blank.
(xi) Trees should be located throughout the parking lot and not simply at the ends of parking aisles. (Refer to the "Parking Lot Area Planting" Section). (xii) Trees and shrubs should be located and spaced to allow for mature and long -term growth. Trees and shrubs should provide minimal root problems. (xiii) Landscaping should occur at the entire base of the building to soften the edge between the parking lot and the structure. Accent planting should be used around entries and key activity hubs.
(xiv) Planting should be used to screen less desirable areas from public view, i.e., trash enclosures, parking areas, storage areas, loading areas, public utilities, and mechanical equipment.
(8) Parking Lot Area Planting
(i) Appropriate lighting and landscaping should be provided, including shade trees and lampposts style (Refer to lighting Section of these Guidelines).
Trees should be located throughout the parking lot and not merely at the ends of parking rows.
(ii) Areas not used for vehicle parking or maneuvering, or for the movement of pedestrians to and from vehicles should be used for landscaping.
(iii) Trees should be distributed throughout the parking lot so as to maximize the aesthetic effect and compatibility with adjoining uses.
(iv) Trees should be located throughout a parking lot and not merely at the ends of parking rows. Trees should be sized at 24-inch box or larger at the time of installation so as to provide shade to parked cars and add aesthetic appeal to the project. (v) Planter islands and landscape fingers should have a minimum interior dimension of five (5) feet and should be located throughout the parking lot and at the end of all parking rows.
(vi) Where parking spaces or drive aisles abut an interior lot line, a landscaped planter strip should be installed.
Attractive looking walls can be made using various materials and textures and by breaking up the wall plane.
(vii) Trash enclosures and loading areas provided in the parking areas shall be screened with landscaping and wall materials.
(viii) Trash enclosures should be separated from adjacent parking stalls by minimum 3- foot wide planters with low -growing plant materials to ensure that adequate space is available for passengers to access a vehicle in an adjacent parking space.
{Editing Note: Sec. 16-3.11.060(b)(7) & (8) only,
all other sections to remain as currently written}
Chapter 3: Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 24: General Development Requirements and Exceptions
Sec. 16-3.24.030: Landscape standards
The purpose of the landscaping requirements in this Section shall be to protect the general welfare by enhancing, conserving and encouraging pleasant and attractive surroundings in all zones of the City.
(a) General provisions applicable to all new development and existing lots:
(1) All landscaping shall be in accord with Section 13.60 of this Code and installed with a permanent irrigation system.
(2) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a neat, clean, orderly and healthful condition.
This includes proper pruning, mowing of lawns, removal of weeds, removal of litter, fertilizing, and replacement of plants where necessary, the regular watering of all plants and the repair of landscape edging/curbing. Property owners shall provide a means to keep decorative rock in-place (i.e. landscape edging, mow curbing, etc.). (3) All areas landscaped with decorative rock, pea gravel or decomposed granite (DG) shall include an unexposed permanent weed barrier. The weed barrier shall be opaque, breathable and permeable as well as durable (does not stretch or tear using bare hands).
Excluding single-family homes, weed barrier installation may be waived by the Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator if the soil is treated with a pre -emergent weed application prior to rock installation and the landscaping is regularly maintained by a licensed commercial landscaping business. Decorative rock shall be contained in place
with the use of landscape edging/curbing to prevent scattering onto the sidewalk or driveways. All areas landscaped with decorative rock shall be treated and/or maintained regularly to control weeds.
(4) All front yard areas installed with drought tolerant landscaping or those converted from water intensive landscaping to drought tolerant landscaping, must permanently remain drought tolerant in accord with Section 13.60.
(b) Single-family landscape standards.
(1) Front yard landscape standards
(i) This section applies to all landscaping installed in small tract lots in conjunction with a building permit for a primary dwelling unit issued after 1-20-2015, the effective date of Ordinance No. 2322, and includes those installed as a part of a tract deve lopment or individual single-family homes.
(ii) All front and street side yards visible from the street shall be covered with landscaping, excluding paved driveways and walkways, which shall be well-maintained and free of weeds.
(iii) All required front and street side yard areas, shall have a minimum of fifty (50) percent landscaping free of paved parking and driveway areas. Any areas used for pedestrian access or other landscape features utilizing paved areas shall be permitted administratively at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator or his designee. (iv) Decorative rock, with a minimum variety of three sizes/types and minimum depth of 3”, shall be used as a permanent and primary form of groundcover within the front yard. Bark or wood mulch within the front and street side yard shall not be used as a permanent or primary form of ground cover within landscape areas, unless located within a flowerbed that is regularly maintained.
(v) Front and street side yard landscaping shall at a minimum include an arrangement or combination of trees (fifteen gallon minimum), shrubs, and live ground cover that is irrigated by an automatic drip or sprinkler watering system. In no case shall decorative rock exceed fifty (50) percent of landscaped area, which shall be calculated by excluding the spread of plants at maturity.
(vi) Front and street side yard landscaping shall be maintained with the requisite minimum amount and size of trees, shrubs, and live ground cover that was installed and approved in conjunction with the building permit that authorized its original installation. (2) Non-conforming front yard landscape standards
(i) This section applies to all existing landscaping within small tract lot subdivisions that was installed before the effective date of Ordinance No. 2322, 1-20-2015. (ii) All front and street side yards visible from the street shall include landscaping, excluding paved driveways and walkways, which shall be well-maintained and free of weeds.
(iii) All required front and street side yard areas shall have a minimum of fifty (50) percent free of paved parking and driveway areas. Any areas used for pedestrian access or other landscape features utilizing paved areas shall be permitted administratively at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator or his designee. (iv) Decorative rock with a minimum depth of 3” shall be used as a permanent and primary form of groundcover. Bark or wood mulch within the front and street side yard shall not be used as a permanent or primary form of ground cover within landscape areas,
unless located within a flowerbed that is regularly maintained. Exposed dirt is prohibited.
(v) Front and street side yard landscaping shall at a minimum include an arrangement or combination of trees (fifteen gallon minimum), shrubs, and live ground cover that is irrigated by a drip or sprinkler watering system. Plant material should produce a minimum twenty-five (25) percent yard coverage calculated at plant maturity. In no case shall exposed decorative rock exceed seventy -five (75) percent of the landscaped area at maturity.
(vi) Should applicable city records be available for confirmation, front and street side yard landscaping shall be maintained with a matching amount and size of trees, shrubs, and live ground cover that was installed and approved in conjunction with the building permit that authorized its original installation, if in compliance with Water Efficient Landscaping standards outlined in Chapter 13.60 of Title 13 of this Code. (1) All front and street side yards visible from the street shall be covered with landscaping, excluding paved driveways and walkways.
(2) All required front and street side yard areas, shall have a minimum of fifty (50) percent landscaping free of paved parking and driveway areas. Any areas used for pedestrian access or other landscape features utilizing paved areas shall be permitted administratively at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator or his designee. (3) Bark or mulch within the front and street side yard shall not be used as a permanent form of ground cover within landscape areas, unless located within a flowerbed that is regularly maintained.
(4) Front and street side yard landscaping shall at a minimum include an arrangement or combination of trees (fifteen gallon minimum), shrubs, and live ground cover. In no case shall decorative rock exceed fifty (50) percent of landscaped area, which shall be calculated by excluding the spread of plants at maturity. (5)(3) Exceptions to single-family landscape standards:
(i) Existing small tract lots covered with landscaping and well-maintained, as so required by this Title, shall not be required to comply with subsection (4). (ii) Existing non-small tract lots shall not be subject to subsections (1) and (2) through (4); however, any lot with previous or currently existing landscaping shall be maintained and free of weeds, as required by this Title or any associated entitlement. (c) Multi-family landscape standards. All areas of the site not occupied by buildings, improvements for the storage of vehicles and access thereto, or improved recreational facility shall be landscaped. Submission of a landscape plan shall be required for all multi-family residential housing. All existing multi-family residential housing that fails to comply with this regulation shall have two years from the effective date of approval of the requirements to submit and gain approval of a landscape plan and install said landscaping. Landscape plans shall be submitted for administrative approval in accordance with the following standards:
(1) The type of plants used for landscaping shall be able to survive in the local climate. (2) Decorative rock, with a minimum variety of three sizes/types, shall be used as a permanent form of groundcover. Bark or wood mulch shall not be used as a permanent and primary form of ground cover within landscape areas, unless located within a flowerbed that is regularly maintained. Exposed dirt within landscaped areas is prohibited.
(3) Plans shall include a variety of plant types such as ground covers, shrubs, trees and turf. The use of decorative rock shall not exceed 25% of the landscape area. Further, the landscape plan shall include the maximum spacing of all plants as follows:
(i) Ground cover - eighteen inches on center.
(ii) One gallon plants - three feet on center.
(iii) Five gallon plants - five feet on center.
(4) Plants used for required screening purposes (trash enclosures, storage areas, utility equipment) shall be a minimum of five gallon size and spaced at a maximum of four feet on center.
(5) Every site shall contain at least two 24-inch box trees for each half acre of lot size. (6) Parking lots within multi -family developments shall meet the development standards listed within subsection (d).
(d) Landscaping requirements for nonresidential lots and parking areas are as follows:
(1) All non-residential lots which abut a dedicated street shall have a planter strip along the entire property abutting the dedicated street, excluding all driveway approaches. The planter strip shall have a minimum interior width of five feet. Properties along Highways 18 (Palmdale Road) and 395 shall have a planter strip with a minimum interior width of ten feet to accommodate any applicable development standards for landscape palettes for thoroughfares.
(2) All nonresidential parking areas requiring four or more parking stalls shall provide the following interior and peripheral landscaping:
(i) All landscaping areas shall be surrounded by a concrete curb or other approved curbing having a minimum height and width of not less than six inches, including planters that abut the public right -of-way sidewalk. Landscaped areas without curbing may be substituted upon review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. (ii) A minimum five -foot interior width landscape planter strip where any parking spaces and/or drive aisles abut an interior lot line or building. (iii) One twenty-four-inch box tree with approved ground cover for every eight parking spaces evenly dispersed throughout the parking area within landscape fingers or tree wells:
(A) Landscape fingers and tree wells shall have a minimum interior width of five feet as measured perpendicularly from side curb;
(B) Tree wells are only permitted when parking spaces are in double stacked rows, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission when utilized to increase compliance with the Commercial Design Guidelines; and (C) Double stacked landscape fingers shall have a minimum of two twenty -four- inch box trees.
(iv) A minimum five-foot interior width planter island shall be located at the end of every parking aisle/row.
(v) All landscaping areas shall be surrounded by a concrete curb or other approved curbing having a minimum height and width of not less than six inches. Landscaped areas without curbing may be substituted upon review and approval of the Director of Planning.
(viv) All parking spaces abutting landscape areas shall include access and maintenance measures as follows:
(A) Landscape areas used as front parking space overhang area shall include two feet additional interior width and be paved in accordance with Figure 21- 3 entitled "Concrete Curb/Wheel Stop" or be landscaped with durable ground cover that will not damage vehicles and be designed exclusive of the minimum required planter widths; and
(B) Landscape areas abutting the side of parking spaces, excluding individual tree wells, shall include one foot additional interior width and be paved to allow for vehicle doors to open freely and not impede passenger access to or from vehicles.
(viivi) All landscaped areas shall be provided with a suitable permanent water system.
(viiivii) Required planters shall not exceed a three foot horizontal to one foot vertical slope ratio.
(ixviii) Rock ground cover shall not exceed twenty-five percent of the total for any landscaped area and such structural features as fountains, pools or art works, but such objects alone shall not meet the requirements of this Section. (xix) The maximum spacing of all plants within the parking area is as follows:
(A) Ground cover—eighteen inches on center.
(B) One gallon plants—three feet on center.
(C) Five gallon plants—five feet on center.
(e) Landscaping Maintenance. All landscaped areas and approved curbing shall be maintained in a neat, clean, orderly and healthful condition. This includes proper pruning, mowing of lawns, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, replacement of plants wher e necessary, the regular watering of all planting and the repair of landscaped curbing.
Chapter 4: Subdivision Regulations (Private Development) Article 2: Tentative Maps
Sec. 16-4.02.030: Expiration of tentative map approval
(a) An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire thirty-six forty-eight months after its approval or conditional approval. Additional automatic extensions to the approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall be in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. (b) Upon application of the subdivider filed prior to the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, the time at which the map expires may be extended by the Planning Commission for any period deemed appropriate and allowed under the Subdivision Map Act. (c) For the purposes of tentative map expiration, "timely filing" of the final map, means the receipt of any outside agency approvals, compliance with conditions of approval, acceptance of improvement security after all required certificates or statements on the map have been signed and/or acknowledged, and completed plan check without re quired corrections. as provided for by Section 66452.6 (d) of the Subdivision Map Act, is defined as acceptance of
the final map on mylar by the City Engineer, as well as the completion of the following requirements:
(i) Signed completion of all required certificates and statements (Surveyor’s or Engineer’s Statement, Owners’ Statement, County Auditor’s Certificate, and County Board of Supervisors’ Certificate);
(ii) Receipt of any outside agency approvals;
(iii) Compliance with the adopted Planning Commission or City Council Conditions of Approval, as applicable;
(iv) Acceptance of the subdivision improvement agreement and security; and (v) Submission of public improvement plans on mylar for approval by the City Engineer.
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT B
Applicable State Bills
State Assembly Bill 2632
(2024)
SHARE THIS:
Date Published: 09/30/2024 09:00 PM
AB-2632 Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. (2023-2024) Assembly Bill No. 2632
CHAPTER 728
An act to add Article 10.11 (commencing with Section 65630) to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, relating to land use.
[ Approved by Governor September 27, 2024. Filed with Secretary of State September 27, 2024. ]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2632, Wilson. Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. (1) Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, among other things, requires the legislative body of each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city and of any land outside its boundaries that relates to its planning. Existing law authorizes the legislative body, if it deems it to be in the public interest, to amend all or part of an adopted general plan, as provided. Existing law also authorizes the legislative body of any county or city, pursuant to specified procedures, to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, open space, and other purposes.
This bill would prohibit a local agency, as defined, from treating a thrift retail store, as defined, differently from a nonthrift retail store engaged in the sale of new items that are similar to items sold by a thrift retail store for purposes of zoning, development standards, or permitting, except as specified. The bill would allow a local agency to require that thrift retail stores meet certain aesthetic or design standards, as prescribed. The bill would prohibit a local agency from prohibiting a thrift retail store from receiving used and donated items for sale in the store or other thrift retail stores, or reuse or recycling, or both reuse and recycling, through other means.
By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions shall be construed to, among other things, prohibit the adoption or enforcement of reasonable local rules or ordinances on retail establishments engaged in the sale of new items that are similar to items sold by a thrift retail store. (2) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Home Bill Information California LawPublicationsOther ResourcesMy SubscriptionsMy Favorites 12/18/24, 10:04 AM Bill Text - AB-2632 Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2632 1/3 Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Article 10.11 (commencing with Section 65630) is added to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, to read:
Article 10.11. Thrift Retail Stores
65630. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1) The 2020 annual report, as published by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, found that California is falling far short of the state diversion goal of 75 percent in 2020. (2) A significant portion of the waste stream into California landfills is composed of clothing and household goods that have not reached the end of their usefulness. Discarded clothing remains the largest source of textile waste in the world, with the average United States citizen throwing away 81 pounds of clothing each year, 95 percent of which could have been reworn or repurposed. Yet, 85 percent of this material ends up in landfills. According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, one garbage truck of textiles is landfilled or incinerated every second.
(3) California faces a growing problem in siting and approving sufficient landfill space. Landfill siting and the expansion of current landfill facilities are controversial and landfills create the potential for significant adverse environmental impacts.
(4) Discarding still-usable clothing and household goods increase greenhouse gas emissions by stimulating production of replacement goods and adding greenhouse gas emissions along the continuum of product manufacture, transportation, warehousing, and delivery. (5) Recent years have seen an increase in consumer interest in purchasing used clothing and smaller household items from retail establishments that specialize in selling such goods, commonly referred to as “thrifting” and “thrift” retail establishments. Thrift accounted for approximately 60 percent of the total secondhand market in 2021. As of June 2022, more than one in three shoppers in the United States, and nearly one-half of Canadian shoppers, surveyed reported caring more about the environmental impact of their apparel choices today than they did three years ago.
(6) Thrift retail establishments are identical to other retail establishments in terms of local impacts on traffic, parking, and other land use topics. In addition, given that thrift establishments divert reusable goods from landfills in furtherance of important statewide policy, those establishments provide environmental benefits that nonthrift retail establishments do not.
(b) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature that local governments be prohibited from classifying or otherwise treating thrift retail establishments differently than nonthrift retail establishments, subject to certain limitations contained in this article.
65631. For purposes of this article, the following definitions apply:
(a) “Thrift retail store” means a retail store and related donation facilities engaged primarily in the sale of secondhand clothing, shoes, apparel, toys, and standard household goods, including furniture, fixtures, and small household appliances, and the collection of those goods for resale. “Thrift retail store” does not include the sale of large household appliances such as refrigerators or stoves and does not include the sale of cars or anything automotive-related.
(b) “Local agency” means a city, including a charter city, a county, or a city and county. 65632. (a) Except as provided by subdivisions (c) to (e), inclusive, a local agency shall not treat a thrift retail store differently from a nonthrift retail store engaged in the sale of new items that are similar to items sold by a thrift retail store for purposes of zoning, development standards, including, but not limited to, height, size, parking requirements, or setbacks from adjacent uses, or permitting. A local agency may also require that thrift retail stores meet certain aesthetic or design standards, including design review approval, provided those standards or design review, or both, are also required of nonthrift retail stores. 12/18/24, 10:04 AM Bill Text - AB-2632 Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2632 2/3 (b) A local agency shall not prohibit a thrift retail store from receiving used and donated items for sale in the store or other thrift retail stores, or reuse or recycling, or both reuse and recycling, through other means. (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the adoption or enforcement of reasonable local rules or ordinances on retail establishments engaged in the sale of new items that are similar to items sold by a thrift retail store.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the adoption or enforcement of reasonable local rules or ordinances on the collection or receipt of used and donated items by a thrift retail store, including, but not limited to, reasonable local rules or ordinances related to any of the following:
(1) Requirements that the delivery of goods or donations is conducted within a specified area of the premises of a thrift retail store.
(2) Requirements that any donation be accepted only during business hours. (3) Requirements that the donation process is operated by employees of the thrift retail store and that the donations of goods from the public are collected and received by employees of the thrift retail store. (4) Limitations on the square footage or percentage of the thrift retail store premises within which collecting and receiving activities are conducted.
(5) Requirements applicable to the operation of equipment associated with the collection, receipt, processing, or disposal of used and donated goods.
(6) Enforcement of health and safety standards including, but not limited to, standards relating to shopping center ingress and egress or the enforcement of illegal dumping. (e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the ability of a local agency to adopt or enforce any local rules or ordinances on businesses other than thrift retail stores.
SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that reducing the waste stream of discarded clothing and household goods to state landfills by facilitating the siting of thrift retail establishments is a matter of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution.
Therefore, Section 1 of this act, adding Article 10.11 (commencing with Section 65630) to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, applies to all cities, including charter cities.
SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
12/18/24, 10:04 AM Bill Text - AB-2632 Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2632 3/3
State Senate Bill 9
(2021)
SHARE THIS:
Date Published: 09/17/2021 09:00 PM
SB-9 Housing development: approvals. (2021-2022)
Senate Bill No. 9
CHAPTER 162
An act to amend Section 66452.6 of, and to add Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to, the Government Code, relating to land use.
[ Approved by Governor September 16, 2021. Filed with Secretary of State September 16, 2021. ]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 9, Atkins. Housing development: approvals.
The Planning and Zoning Law provides for the creation of accessory dwelling units by local ordinance, or, if a local agency has not adopted an ordinance, by ministerial approval, in accordance with specified standards and conditions.
This bill, among other things, would require a proposed housing development containing no more than 2 residential units within a single-family residential zone to be considered ministerially, without discretionary review or hearing, if the proposed housing development meets certain requirements, including, but not limited to, that the proposed housing development would not require demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income, that the proposed housing development does not allow for the demolition of more than 25% of the existing exterior structural walls, except as provided, and that the development is not located within a historic district, is not included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or is not within a site that is legally designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district.
The bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving the construction of 2 residential units, including, but not limited to, authorizing a local agency to impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, as defined, unless those standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to 2 units or physically precluding either of the 2 units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, prohibiting the imposition of setback requirements under certain circumstances, and setting maximum setback requirements under all other circumstances.
The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the local agency’s processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps, and the modification of those maps. Under the Subdivision Map Act, an approved or conditionally approved tentative map expires 24 months after its approval or conditional approval or after any additional period of time as prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed an additional 12 months, except as provided.
Home Bill Information California LawPublicationsOther ResourcesMy SubscriptionsMy Favorites 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 1/8 This bill, among other things, would require a local agency to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split that meets certain requirements, including, but not limited to, that the urban lot split would not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income, that the parcel is located within a single-family residential zone, and that the parcel is not located within a historic district, is not included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or is not within a site that is legally designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district.
The bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving an urban lot split, including, but not limited to, authorizing a local agency to impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, as defined, unless those standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of 2 units, as defined, on either of the resulting parcels or physically precluding either of the 2 units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, prohibiting the imposition of setback requirements under certain circumstances, and setting maximum setback requirements under all other circumstances. The bill would require an applicant to sign an affidavit stating that they intend to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of 3 years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split, unless the applicant is a community land trust or a qualified nonprofit corporation, as specified. The bill would prohibit a local agency from imposing any additional owner occupancy standards on applicants. By requiring applicants to sign affidavits, thereby expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would also extend the limit on the additional period that may be provided by ordinance, as described above, from 12 months to 24 months and would make other conforming or nonsubstantive changes.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA does not apply to the approval of ministerial projects.
This bill, by establishing the ministerial review processes described above, would thereby exempt the approval of projects subject to those processes from CEQA.
The California Coastal Act of 1976 provides for the planning and regulation of development, under a coastal development permit process, within the coastal zone, as defined, that shall be based on various coastal resources planning and management policies set forth in the act.
This bill would exempt a local agency from being required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for housing developments and urban lot splits pursuant to the above provisions.
By increasing the duties of local agencies with respect to land use regulations, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program.
The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 65852.21 is added to the Government Code, to read:
65852.21. (a) A proposed housing development containing no more than two residential units within a single- family residential zone shall be considered ministerially, without discretionary review or a hearing, if the proposed housing development meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The parcel subject to the proposed housing development is located within a city, the boundaries of which include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau. 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 2/8 (2) The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
(3) Notwithstanding any provision of this section or any local law, the proposed housing development would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(A) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. (B) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(C) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (4) The parcel subject to the proposed housing development is not a parcel on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner’s rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
(5) The proposed housing development does not allow the demolition of more than 25 percent of the existing exterior structural walls, unless the housing development meets at least one of the following conditions:
(A) If a local ordinance so allows.
(B) The site has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (6) The development is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding any local law and except as provided in paragraph (2), a local agency may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards that do not conflict with this section.
(2) (A) The local agency shall not impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two units or that would physically preclude either of the two units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area. (B) (i) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (ii) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), in all other circumstances not described in clause (i), a local agency may require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines. (c) In addition to any conditions established in accordance with subdivision (b), a local agency may require any of the following conditions when considering an application for two residential units as provided for in this section:
(1) Off-street parking of up to one space per unit, except that a local agency shall not impose parking requirements in either of the following instances:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop, as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel. (2) For residential units connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, a percolation test completed within the last 5 years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years. (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a local agency may deny a proposed housing development project if the building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 3/8 (e) A local agency shall require that a rental of any unit created pursuant to this section be for a term longer than 30 days.
(f) Notwithstanding Section 65852.2 or 65852.22, a local agency shall not be required to permit an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit on parcels that use both the authority contained within this section and the authority contained in Section 66411.7. (g) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), an application shall not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance. (h) Local agencies shall include units constructed pursuant to this section in the annual housing element report as required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400. (i) For purposes of this section, all of the following apply:
(1) A housing development contains two residential units if the development proposes no more than two new units or if it proposes to add one new unit to one existing unit. (2) The terms “objective zoning standards,” “objective subdivision standards,” and “objective design review standards” mean standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. These standards may be embodied in alternative objective land use specifications adopted by a local agency, and may include, but are not limited to, housing overlay zones, specific plans, inclusionary zoning ordinances, and density bonus ordinances.
(3) “Local agency” means a city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered. (j) A local agency may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of this section. An ordinance adopted to implement this section shall not be considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(k) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the local agency shall not be required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for a housing development pursuant to this section.
SEC. 2. Section 66411.7 is added to the Government Code, to read:
66411.7. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this division and any local law, a local agency shall ministerially approve, as set forth in this section, a parcel map for an urban lot split only if the local agency determines that the parcel map for the urban lot split meets all the following requirements:
(1) The parcel map subdivides an existing parcel to create no more than two new parcels of approximately equal lot area provided that one parcel shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision.
(2) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), both newly created parcels are no smaller than 1,200 square feet.
(B) A local agency may by ordinance adopt a smaller minimum lot size subject to ministerial approval under this subdivision.
(3) The parcel being subdivided meets all the following requirements:
(A) The parcel is located within a single-family residential zone. (B) The parcel subject to the proposed urban lot split is located within a city, the boundaries of which include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau. (C) The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 4/8 (D) The proposed urban lot split would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(i) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. (ii) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(iii) A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner’s rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
(iv) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (E) The parcel is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance. (F) The parcel has not been established through prior exercise of an urban lot split as provided for in this section.
(G) Neither the owner of the parcel being subdivided nor any person acting in concert with the owner has previously subdivided an adjacent parcel using an urban lot split as provided for in this section. (b) An application for a parcel map for an urban lot split shall be approved in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) A local agency shall approve or deny an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split ministerially without discretionary review.
(2) A local agency shall approve an urban lot split only if it conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410)), except as otherwise expressly provided in this section.
(3) Notwithstanding Section 66411.1, a local agency shall not impose regulations that require dedications of rights-of-way or the construction of offsite improvements for the parcels being created as a condition of issuing a parcel map for an urban lot split pursuant to this section. (c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), notwithstanding any local law, a local agency may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards applicable to a parcel created by an urban lot split that do not conflict with this section. (2) A local agency shall not impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet. (3) (A) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (B) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), in all other circumstances not described in subparagraph (A), a local agency may require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines. (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a local agency may deny an urban lot split if the building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. (e) In addition to any conditions established in accordance with this section, a local agency may require any of the following conditions when considering an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split:
(1) Easements required for the provision of public services and facilities. (2) A requirement that the parcels have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way. 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 5/8 (3) Off-street parking of up to one space per unit, except that a local agency shall not impose parking requirements in either of the following instances:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel. (f) A local agency shall require that the uses allowed on a lot created by this section be limited to residential uses.
(g) (1) A local agency shall require an applicant for an urban lot split to sign an affidavit stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split.
(2) This subdivision shall not apply to an applicant that is a “community land trust,” as defined in clause (ii) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or is a “qualified nonprofit corporation” as described in Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. (3) A local agency shall not impose additional owner occupancy standards, other than provided for in this subdivision, on an urban lot split pursuant to this section. (h) A local agency shall require that a rental of any unit created pursuant to this section be for a term longer than 30 days.
(i) A local agency shall not require, as a condition for ministerial approval of a parcel map application for the creation of an urban lot split, the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions. (j) (1) Notwithstanding any provision of Section 65852.2, 65852.21, 65852.22, 65915, or this section, a local agency shall not be required to permit more than two units on a parcel created through the exercise of the authority contained within this section.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “unit” means any dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, a unit or units created pursuant to Section 65852.21, a primary dwelling, an accessory dwelling unit as defined in Section 65852.2, or a junior accessory dwelling unit as defined in Section 65852.22. (k) Notwithstanding paragraph (3) of subdivision (c), an application shall not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
(l) Local agencies shall include the number of applications for parcel maps for urban lot splits pursuant to this section in the annual housing element report as required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400.
(m) For purposes of this section, both of the following shall apply:
(1) “Objective zoning standards,” “objective subdivision standards,” and “objective design review standards” mean standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. These standards may be embodied in alternative objective land use specifications adopted by a local agency, and may include, but are not limited to, housing overlay zones, specific plans, inclusionary zoning ordinances, and density bonus ordinances.
(2) “Local agency” means a city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered. (n) A local agency may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of this section. An ordinance adopted to implement this section shall not be considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(o) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the local agency shall not be required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for urban lot splits pursuant to this section. 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 6/8 SEC. 3. Section 66452.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:
66452.6. (a) (1) An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after its approval or conditional approval, or after any additional period of time as may be prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed an additional 24 months. However, if the subdivider is required to expend two hundred thirty-six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($236,790) or more to construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, excluding improvements of public rights-of-way that abut the boundary of the property to be subdivided and that are reasonably related to the development of that property, each filing of a final map authorized by Section 66456.1 shall extend the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by 48 months from the date of its expiration, as provided in this section, or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map more than 10 years from its approval or conditional approval.
However, a tentative map on property subject to a development agreement authorized by Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 65864) of Chapter 4 of Division 1 may be extended for the period of time provided for in the agreement, but not beyond the duration of the agreement. The number of phased final maps that may be filed shall be determined by the advisory agency at the time of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map.
(2) Commencing January 1, 2012, and each calendar year thereafter, the amount of two hundred thirty-six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($236,790) shall be annually increased by operation of law according to the adjustment for inflation set forth in the statewide cost index for class B construction, as determined by the State Allocation Board at its January meeting. The effective date of each annual adjustment shall be March 1.
The adjusted amount shall apply to tentative and vesting tentative maps whose applications were received after the effective date of the adjustment.
(3) “Public improvements,” as used in this subdivision, include traffic controls, streets, roads, highways, freeways, bridges, overcrossings, street interchanges, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, and lighting facilities.
(b) (1) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any extension thereof granted pursuant to subdivision (e), shall not include any period of time during which a development moratorium, imposed after approval of the tentative map, is in existence. However, the length of the moratorium shall not exceed five years. (2) The length of time specified in paragraph (1) shall be extended for up to three years, but in no event beyond January 1, 1992, during the pendency of any lawsuit in which the subdivider asserts, and the local agency that approved or conditionally approved the tentative map denies, the existence or application of a development moratorium to the tentative map.
(3) Once a development moratorium is terminated, the map shall be valid for the same period of time as was left to run on the map at the time that the moratorium was imposed. However, if the remaining time is less than 120 days, the map shall be valid for 120 days following the termination of the moratorium. (c) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any extension thereof granted pursuant to subdivision (e), shall not include the period of time during which a lawsuit involving the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map is or was pending in a court of competent jurisdiction, if the stay of the time period is approved by the local agency pursuant to this section. After service of the initial petition or complaint in the lawsuit upon the local agency, the subdivider may apply to the local agency for a stay pursuant to the local agency’s adopted procedures. Within 40 days after receiving the application, the local agency shall either stay the time period for up to five years or deny the requested stay. The local agency may, by ordinance, establish procedures for reviewing the requests, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirements, appeal procedures, and other administrative requirements.
(d) The expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall terminate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map of all or any portion of the real property included within the tentative map shall be filed with the legislative body without first processing a new tentative map. Once a timely filing is made, subsequent actions of the local agency, including, but not limited to, processing, approving, and recording, may lawfully occur after the date of expiration of the tentative map. Delivery to the county surveyor or city engineer shall be deemed a timely filing for purposes of this section. (e) Upon application of the subdivider filed before the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, the time at which the map expires pursuant to subdivision (a) may be extended by the legislative body or by an advisory agency authorized to approve or conditionally approve tentative maps for a period or 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 7/8 periods not exceeding a total of six years. The period of extension specified in this subdivision shall be in addition to the period of time provided by subdivision (a). Before the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map, upon an application by the subdivider to extend that map, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs first. If the advisory agency denies a subdivider’s application for an extension, the subdivider may appeal to the legislative body within 15 days after the advisory agency has denied the extension. (f) For purposes of this section, a development moratorium includes a water or sewer moratorium, or a water and sewer moratorium, as well as other actions of public agencies that regulate land use, development, or the provision of services to the land, including the public agency with the authority to approve or conditionally approve the tentative map, which thereafter prevents, prohibits, or delays the approval of a final or parcel map.
A development moratorium shall also be deemed to exist for purposes of this section for any period of time during which a condition imposed by the city or county could not be satisfied because of either of the following:
(1) The condition was one that, by its nature, necessitated action by the city or county, and the city or county either did not take the necessary action or by its own action or inaction was prevented or delayed in taking the necessary action before expiration of the tentative map. (2) The condition necessitates acquisition of real property or any interest in real property from a public agency, other than the city or county that approved or conditionally approved the tentative map, and that other public agency fails or refuses to convey the property interest necessary to satisfy the condition. However, nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to require any public agency to convey any interest in real property owned by it. A development moratorium specified in this paragraph shall be deemed to have been imposed either on the date of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map, if evidence was included in the public record that the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein may refuse to convey that property or interest, or on the date that the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein receives an offer by the subdivider to purchase that property or interest for fair market value, whichever is later. A development moratorium specified in this paragraph shall extend the tentative map up to the maximum period as set forth in subdivision (b), but not later than January 1, 1992, so long as the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein fails or refuses to convey the necessary property interest, regardless of the reason for the failure or refusal, except that the development moratorium shall be deemed to terminate 60 days after the public agency has officially made, and communicated to the subdivider, a written offer or commitment binding on the agency to convey the necessary property interest for a fair market value, paid in a reasonable time and manner.
SEC. 4. The Legislature finds and declares that ensuring access to affordable housing is a matter of statewide concern and not a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution.
Therefore, Sections 1 and 2 of this act adding Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to the Government Code and Section 3 of this act amending Section 66452.6 of the Government Code apply to all cities, including charter cities.
SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act or because costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 8/8
State Assembly Bill 2729
(2024)
SHARE THIS:
Date Published: 09/30/2024 09:00 PM
AB-2729 Development projects: permits and other entitlements. (2023-2024) Assembly Bill No. 2729
CHAPTER 737
An act to add Section 65914.4 to the Government Code, relating to land use. [ Approved by Governor September 27, 2024. Filed with Secretary of State September 27, 2024. ]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2729, Joe Patterson. Development projects: permits and other entitlements.
The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and each city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for its physical development, and the development of specified land outside its boundaries, that includes, among other mandatory elements, a housing element. Existing law, the Permit Streamlining Act, among other things, requires a public agency that is the lead agency for a development project to approve or disapprove that project within specified time periods. Existing law extended by 18 months the period for the expiration, effectuation, or utilization of a housing entitlement, as defined, that was issued before, and was in effect on, March 4, 2020, and that would expire before December 31, 2021, except as specified. Existing law provides that if the state or a local agency extended the otherwise applicable time for the expiration, effectuation, or utilization of a housing entitlement for not less than 18 months, as specified, that housing entitlement would not be extended an additional 18 months pursuant to these provisions.
This bill would extend by 18 months the period for the expiration, effectuation, or utilization of a housing entitlement, as defined, that was issued before January 1, 2024, and that will expire before December 31, 2025, except as specified. The bill would toll this 18-month extension during any time that the housing entitlement is the subject of a legal challenge. By adding to the duties of local officials with respect to housing entitlements, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 65914.4 is added to the Government Code, to read:
Home Bill Information California LawPublicationsOther ResourcesMy SubscriptionsMy Favorites 1/7/25, 6:23 PM Bill Text - AB-2729 Development projects: permits and other entitlements. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2729 1/3 65914.4. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), notwithstanding any law, including any inconsistent provision of a local agency’s general plan, ordinances, or regulations, the otherwise applicable time for the expiration, effectuation, or utilization of a housing entitlement that is within the scope of the timeframes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) is extended by 18 months. For the purposes of this section, housing entitlements that are extended are entitlements where both of the following apply:
(1) It was issued prior to and was in effect on January 1, 2024. (2) It will expire prior to December 31, 2025.
The otherwise applicable time for the utilization of a housing entitlement provided by this section includes any requirement to request the issuance of a building permit within a specified period of time. (b) If the state or a local agency extends, on or after January 1, 2024, but before the effective date of the act adding this section, the otherwise applicable time for the expiration, effectuation, or utilization of a housing entitlement for not less than 18 months and pursuant to the same conditions provided in subdivision (a), that housing entitlement shall not be extended for an additional 18 months by operation of subdivision (a). (c) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) “Housing entitlement” means any of the following:
(A) A legislative, adjudicative, administrative, or any other kind of approval, permit, or other entitlement necessary for, or pertaining to, a housing development project issued by a state agency. (B) An approval, permit, or other entitlement issued by a local agency for a housing development project that is subject to Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 65920). (C) A ministerial approval, permit, or entitlement by a local agency required as a prerequisite to issuance of a building permit for a housing development project.
(D) A requirement to submit an application for a building permit within a specified period of time after the effective date of a housing entitlement described in subparagraph (B) or (C). (E) A tentative map, vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which a tentative map or vesting tentative map, as the case may be, has been approved.
(F) A vested right associated with an approval, permit, or other entitlement described in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a housing entitlement does not include any of the following:
(A) A development agreement issued pursuant to Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 65864). (B) An approved or conditionally approved tentative map that is extended for a minimum of 24 months pursuant to Section 66452.6 on or after January 1, 2024. (C) A preliminary application as defined in Section 65941.1. (3) “Housing development project” means a residential development or mixed-use development in which at least two-thirds of the square footage of the development is designated for residential use. Both of the following apply for the purposes of calculating the square footage usage of a development for purposes of this section:
(A) The square footage of a development shall include any additional density, floor area, and units, and any other concession, incentive, or waiver of development standards pursuant to Section 65915. (B) The square footage of a development shall not include any underground space, including, but not limited to, a basement or underground parking garage.
(4) “Local agency” means a county, city, whether general law or chartered, city and county, school district, special district, authority, agency, any other municipal public corporation or district, or other political subdivision of the state.
(d) The extension granted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be tolled during any time that the housing entitlement is the subject of a legal challenge.
1/7/25, 6:23 PM Bill Text - AB-2729 Development projects: permits and other entitlements. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2729 2/3 (e) Nothing in this section is intended to preclude a local government from exercising its existing authority to provide an extension to an entitlement identified in this section. (f) The Legislature finds and declares that ensuring planned housing projects can continue without delays due to expiring entitlements is a matter of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this section applies to all cities, including charter cities.
SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
1/7/25, 6:23 PM Bill Text - AB-2729 Development projects: permits and other entitlements. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2729 3/3
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT C
Existing Non-Small Tract Lots
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT D
Eligible Tract Maps List
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT E
Background Information – January 8,
2025, Planning Commission Meeting
Excerpt from the January 8, 2025, Regular Planning Commission Meeting PLAN24-00023 – City of Victorville
4. An Amendment to the Victorville Municipal Code with an Environmental Exemption to make various changes to Title 16 including but n ot limited to new and updated definitions, new land use allowances and standards related to thrift retail stores, revised landscape standards, and an update and clarification to tentative tract map approval periods
Location:
Citywide
Recommendation:
Staf
f recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, receive testimony regarding the proposed amendments and tak e the following actions:
1. Environmental Assessment – Find the project categorically exempt per CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and
2. Code Amendment – Adopt Resolution No. P-25-006, recommending City Council approval of Municipal Code Amendment Case No. PLAN24-00023.
Comments ensued.
Chairman Kurth opened the public hearing.
Speakers:
None
Chairman Kurth closed the public hearing.
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations.
Moved: Commissioner Marshall
Seconded: Commissioner Thomas
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Commissioner Marsh, Commissioner Marshall, Commissioner Thomas, Vice Chair Mesen, Chairman Kurth
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PLAN24-00023
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An Amendment to the Victorvil le Municipal Code with an Environmental Exemption to make various changes to Title 16 including but not limited to new and updated definitions, new land use allowances and standards related to thrift retail stores, revised landscape standards, and an update and clarification to tentative tract map approval periods.
APPLICANT: CITY OF VICTORVILLE
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING DATES: January 8, 2025
SUMMARY FOR JANUARY 8, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED: 0
NUMBER OF PEOPLE SPEAKING IN FAVOR: 0
NUMBER OF PEOPLE SPEAKING OPPOSED: 0
NUMBER OF WRITTEN COMMENTS IN FAVOR: 0
NUMBER OF WRITTEN COMMENTS OPPOSED: 0
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend City Council A pproval
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommended City Co uncil Approval
PLANNING COMMISSION VOTE: Marshall Aye
Marsh Aye
Thomas Aye
Mesen Aye
Kurth Aye
rh
Item Number: 4
Planning Commission
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Meeting of: January 8, 2025
Submitted By:
Alex Jauregui, City Planner
Case:
PLAN24-00023
Subject:
An Amendment to the Victorville Municipal Code with an Environmental Exemption to make various changes to Title 16 including but not limited to new and updated definitions, new land use allowances and standards related to thrift retail stores, revised landscape standards, and an update and clarification to tentative tract map approval periods.
Applicant:
City of Victorville - Planning Department
Location:
Citywide
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, receive testimony regarding the proposed amendments and take the following actions:
1.Environmental Assessment – Find the project categorically exempt per CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and
2.Code Amendment – Adopt Resolution No. P-25-006, recommending City Council approval of Municipal Code Amendment Case No. PLAN24-00023.
Summary:
The subject City staff initiated amendments to the City of Victorville Municipal Code (VMC) are being proposed in order to address recent State Assembly and Senate Bills that address allowances for the approval period of Tentative Tract Maps as well as the permitted operation of retail thrift stores. Additionally, amendments to the VMC are also included in the proposal related to landscape standards for single-family residences and commercial/industrial developments, which have been revised and updated to memorialize common allowances by the Planning Commission as well as provide the City’s Code Enforcement staff with clarification on required landscape improvements given that the City’s standards have evolved over time. Staff recommends approval of the VMC amendments included in this proposal as they will ensure compliance with recent State mandates, promote housing development, and provide aesthetic enhancements to landscaping in development throughout the City.
Discussion/Analysis:
The proposed changes to Title 16 of the VMC (also known as the “Development Code”) are discussed in the following synopsis of each Section and Subsection, the full text of which (including existing and deleted text) is located in proposed Resolution No. P-25- 006 (Attachment A). As proposed, the included Development Code Amendments will provide additional allowances for retail thrift stores, clarify and update landscape standards, and extend the initial approval period for Tentative Tract Map approvals as follows:
Victorville Municipal Code - Title 16
(Development Code)
Chapter 1 – Development Department
Article 3: - Definitions
Section 16-1.03.010: - Definitions
• Updated the definition of “decorative rock” to exclude sand as an acceptable form of groundcover given concerns with durability and ability to remain in position in the local climate.
• Updated the definition of landscape “groundcover” to clarify the necessary depth of rock groundcover and coordinate with existing standards outlined in the Commercial Design Guidelines.
• Added a definition of a “thrift retail store” to match the definition provided within State Assembly Bill 2632 (Attachment B).
Chapter 3 – Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 7: - Land Use and Special Requirements
Section 16-3.07.010: - Permitted and conditional land uses – All Zoning Districts • Added “thrift retail store” as a permitted use within the Neighborhood Service (C-1), General Commercial (C-2), and Health & Wellness Overlay (HWO) zone districts in compliance with Assembly Bill 2632, which requires that local jurisdictions allow such uses anywhere that the sale of similar new merchandise is permitted (excluding large household appliances, vehicles, or anything automobile related).
Section 16-3.07.020:- Special requirements for certain permitted & conditional uses • Added operating standards for “thrift retail stores” in compliance with the allowances provided by Assembly Bill 2632, which permits local jurisdictions regulation of business operations related to donation drop off locations and times, area of establishments dedicated to donation acceptance/processing, as well as enforcement of health and safety issues such as emergency egress and illegal dumping. As proposed, these additional requirements are aimed at preventing potential adverse impacts to commercial districts while complying with Assembly Bill 2632.
Article 10: - Commercial Districts
Section 16-3.10.060: - Design guidelines
• Updates landscape standards to require:
o Enhanced landscaping at project frontages;
o A minimum of three decorative rock size/types for groundcover areas; and o The prohibition of bark or wood mulch to be used as a permanent or primary form of groundcover.
These changes are proposed to codify standards that have historically been required by the Commercial Design Guidelines but necessitated clarification to ensure inclusion in all new commercial development.
Article 11: - Industrial Districts
Section 16-3.11.060: - Design guidelines
• Updates landscape standards to require:
o Enhanced landscaping at project frontages and area visible from public view; o A minimum of three decorative rock size/types and depth of 3” for groundcover areas; and
o The prohibition of bark or wood mulch to be used as a permanent or primary form of groundcover.
These changes are proposed to codify standards that have historically been required by the Commercial Design Guidelines but not clearly defined within the Industrial Design Guidelines and necessitated clarification to ensure inclusion in all new industrial development.
Article 24: - General Development Requirements and Exceptions Section 16-3.24.030: - Landscape standards
• Clarifies the applicability of the various front yard landscape standards related to single-family residences that have been adopted over time. Previous standards for small tract lots (e.g. lots 7,200 sq. ft. in size or smaller) range from no required front yard landscaping prior to 2007, limited standards from 2007-2015 that only required 50% of front yards to be landscaped, and the current landscape standards from 2015 to current that address specific amounts of plant material, sizes, and multiple types of groundcover. As proposed, these amendments will enable the City’s Code Enforcement Department to clearly implement City landscape requirements on existing single-family residences as follows:
o 2015 – Current: Homes with building permits issued beginning in 2015 through today are required to comply with all current standards relating to the installation of trees, shrubs, groundcover, as well as landscaped areas that are not permitted to include more than 50% of decorative rock.
o Prior to 2015: Homes completed prior to 2015 are required to at least provide plant material that will cover 25% of the front yard area at maturity with decorative rock allowed to be exposed, or not covered, with plant material within 75% of the front yard.
o ½ Acre & Larger Lots: Homes located on property that is zoned for ½ acre in size or larger will be permitted to maintain front yards without landscaping if they were originally developed as such. However, single-family dwellings on these lots developed with landscaping that was included in an associated entitlement will be required to maintain the originally approved landscaping in accordance with the Single-family Design Guidelines.
• Added minimum decorative rock variety and sizes to multi-family landscape standards to coordinate with single-family, commercial, and industrial standards while also expressly prohibiting exposed dirt.
• Clarified requirements for planter width when vehicle parking is designed to overhang into planter areas.
• Removed repetitive landscape standards.
Chapter 4 – Subdivision Regulations (Private Development) Article 2: - Tentative Maps
Section 16-4.02.030: - Expiration of tentative map approval • With the adoption of Senate Bill 9 in 2021 (Attachment C), the State authorized local jurisdictions to extend the initial approval period of tentative maps from 36 months to 48 months. Inasmuch as the City has historically supported new housing development and because the City’s Housing Element of the General Plan seeks to promote new housing within the City, Staff finds this allowance appropriate as it will provide additional time for landowners to record final maps and develop housing. Additionally, City Staff find that this allowance should be implemented retroactively, and has included a list of previously approved tentative tract maps that will benefit from this extended expiration date if approved (Attachment D).
• While the Subdivision Map Act notes that a “timely filing” of a tentative map filed with the City will extend the life of a tentative map to allow for its recordation, no definition of a “timely filing” is provided and the City’s current definition of such requires clarification to ensure that the allowance for a “timely filing” is only used when maps are in a position to record. Additionally, this revision has been requested by the City Engineer for clarity.
Number of Radius Letters Mailed:
N/A - In accordance with State law, 1/8th page advertisement prepared in lieu of radius mailers given impacts to more than one-thousand property owners.
Attachments: Attachment A – Resolution No. P-25-006
Attachment B – State Assembly Bill 2632 (2024)
Attachment C – State Senate Bill 9 (2021)
Attachment D – Eligible Tract Maps
PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTACHMENT A
Resolution No. P-25-006
RESOLUTION NO. P-25-006
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE ADOPTION OF MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT CASE PLAN24-00023, AN AMENDMENT TO THE VICTORVILLE MUNICIPAL
CODE WITH AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION TO MAKE VARIOUS CHANGES TO TITLE 16 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO NEW AND UPDATED DEFINITIONS, NEW LAND USE
ALLOWANCES AND STANDARDS RELATED TO THRIFT RETAIL STORES, REVISED
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS, AND AN UPDATE AND CLARIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPROVAL PERIODS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16-2.01.020 of the Victorville Municipal Code, the City of Victorville has initiated amendments to Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16-2.01.030 of the Victorville Municipal Code, the City of Victorville Planning Department prepared a Staff Report detailing the proposed Victorville Municipal Code amendments as well as their conformance with applicable standards and requirements; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 8th day of January 2025, pursuant to Title 7, Division I, Chapter 4, Article 2 of the Government Code, State of California, to hear arguments for and against the issue; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4, Article 2, Section 65850 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City may adopt by ordinance regulations affecting: the use of buildings, structures and land; the location, height, bulk, and size of buildings and structures; the size and use of lots, yards, courts and other open spaces; the intensity of land use; and requirements for off-street parking and loading; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4, Article 2, Section 65850 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City has adopted Title 16, Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 16-2.01.010 of the Victorville Municipal Code, providing the authority to amend Title 16 Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
of the Victorville Municipal Code and the various regulations, requirements, exceptions and guidelines located therein; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments relating to thrift retail stores, landscaping, and tentative map approval periods will result in a more aesthetically pleasing community with more uniform and easily enforceable regulations, and will promote housing by allowing longer approval periods to facilitate housing development; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments relating to thrift retail stores are necessary updates to bring the City’s Zoning Ordinance into conformance with new state laws, and that the amendments will work to prevent adverse impacts to General Commercial Zones by instituting regulations associated with donation drop off locations and times, area of establishments dedicated to donation acceptance/processing, as well as enforcement of health and safety issues such as emergency egress and illegal dumping, which are permitted by state law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments relating to landscaping are necessary to clarify enforceable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance given the varying landscape standards adopted by the City of Victorville over time, and that the amendment will result in aesthetic improvements to the community and new development as mandated by the various development standards and design guidelines included in the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments relating to the extension of tentative map approval periods promote housing development and are compliant with the Housing Element of the General Plan and assist in working towards meeting the City’s regional housing needs allocation, and that application retroactively to recently approved tentative maps is appropriate for the reasons stated above; and
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that certain sections of the Development Code must be updated to maintain consistency with the Land Use Element most recently adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that multiple notations will be updated with these amendments, which is pertinent in order to provide a Development Code that is clear, enforceable, and readable by the public and City Staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds on their own independent judgment that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based upon CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), as there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment inasmuch as the proposed amendment: is aimed at improving and enhancing landscaping in accordance with the City’s water efficient landscaping ordinance; will bring the Victorville Municipal Code into conformance with existing State law regarding thrift retail stores, which are required to be permitted anywhere similar new merchandise is permitted; and will increase approval periods to promote housing development within the City, which is constantly working to meet is regional housing needs allocation as outlined in the Housing Element of the General Plan; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 16-2.01.050 of the Victorville Municipal Code, that it recommends to the City Council that Amendment PLAN24-00023, a Title 16 Municipal Code Amendment, be adopted as follows:
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
Legend
Existing Text
Deleted Text
Revised Text
New Text
{Editing Notes}
Chapter 1: Development Department
Article 3: Definitions
Section 16-1.03.010: - Definitions
Decorative rock
colored stones, cobble rock, boulders of varied sizes, quartzite, pea gravel, or decomposed granite or sand used to achieve 100% landscape ground cover with an adequate depth. Grey rock, or blended rock may be considered decorative rock if incorporated into a design with the decorative rock.
Groundcover
a combination of low-lying live vegetation where upon vegetation maturity achieves 100% soil coverage, non-plastic/nylon artificial turf with a minimum length (pile height) of 1¼ inches or decorative rock a minimum of 3-inches in depth used to achieve 100% soil coverage
Lot, small tract
a single-family residential lot, within a recorded tract map, consisting of lots zoned for less than one-half acre in size, excluding ½ acre or larger sized lots within the R-1 initiative areas.
Thrift retail store
A retail store and related donation facility engaged primarily in the sale of secondhand clothing, shoes, apparel, toys, and standard household goods, including furniture, fixtures, and small household appliances, and the collection of those goods for resale. “Thrift retail store” excludes the sale of large household appliances such as refrigerators or stoves and does not include the sale of vehicles or anything automotive-related. {Editing Notes: “Lot, small tract” definition provided for reference only, no changes proposed.
Position new definitions in alphabetical order with existing definition table} Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
Chapter 3: Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 7: Land Use and Special Requirements
Sec. 16-3.07.010: Permitted and conditional land uses – All zoning districts Table 7-1 Permitted, Conditional, Accessory and Temporary Land Uses - All Zoning Districts
ZONE
USE
AE A SR R1 R2 R3 R4 MDR RMPD C1 C2/C4 CA CM IPD M1 M2 PC HWO 23) RETAIL
Building materials - - - - - - - - - C C - - P P P - C
Equipment sales &
rental - - - - - - - - - C C C P C C C - C
Galleria P P
Guns &
ammunition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C C - -
Indoor/outdoor
swap meet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
New General
Merchandise - - - - - - - - - P P - - - - - - P
Used General
Merchandise - - - - - - - - - P - - - - - - - -
Thrift Retail Store P P P
Wholesale
establishment - - - - - - - - - C C - - P P P - C
{Editing Note: Excerpt of Table 7-1 only, all other portions of Section 16-3.07.010 and Table 7-1 to remain as currently written}
Sec. 16-3.07.020: Special requirements for certain permitted and conditional uses (k) Thrift retail stores
(1) Thrift retail stores shall be subject to the following operating requirements:
i. The drop off and receipt of donations shall only take place during business hours and must be physically accepted by an employee, unattended drop-off donations or the use of donation drop boxes are prohibited.
ii. The business shall install and maintain signage that identifies where donations are accepted onsite and stipulates that donation drop-offs are prohibited during non- business hours.
iii. Donations must be accepted only at designated receiving areas at the rear of buildings screened from the public right-of-way, if designed with service door access and parking/unloading areas that do not impede emergency access; alternatively should a Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
donation area visible from the right-of-way be the only feasible means based on building design, a donation acceptance area shall be provided within the building; and all donations shall only be accepted within the enclosed building. iv. Donation sites and receiving areas shall be kept clear at all times and regularly cleaned, at no time shall trash or debris be allowed to collect at the donation site.
Outdoor storage of used or donated goods or associated collection/processing apparatus is prohibited.
v. Operation of any equipment utilized to collect or process used or donated good shall take place only within an enclosed area of the building and no exterior evidence of equipment shall be permitted without being screened from public view, as approved by the Zoning Administrator in accordance with the Commercial Design Guidelines. vi. The disposal of any used or donated goods shall be conducted in conformance with the guidelines of the City’s waste purveyor, including but not limited to compliance with any material recycling standards.
vii. Thrift retail stores shall operate primarily in a retail capacity, maintaining the display of products for sale on racks, shelving and display areas, at no time shall the donation and receiving area exceed twenty (20) percent of the overall floor area. {Editing Note: Sec. 16-3.07.020 only, all other sections to remain as currently written} Chapter 3: Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 10: Commercial Districts
Sec. 16-3.10.060: Design guidelines
(b) Site Planning and Design. Site planning refers to the arrangement of buildings and parking areas, the size and location of pedestrian spaces and landscaping, and how these features relate to one another. Site design addresses the scale and size of outdoor spaces, spaces between buildings and parking areas and the relationship of site elements that create a comfortable pedestrian environment.
(9) Landscaping. Landscaping within commercial developments shall create a sense of place by establishing a unique and inviting frontage design that incorporates landscape design elements, varying rock sizes and dense plantings that are unique to the project frontage and shall conform to Section 13.60 of the Victorville Municipal Code while incorporating Water Conservation Ordinance 2114 and should incorporate the following design standards:
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
This formal planting area helps to create a visually stimulating landscape. i. Native and low water use plants shall be used in developing the landscaping palette for a project (City Ordinance 2114).
ii. Landscaping should consist of 24-inch, 36-inch and 48-inch box trees (15-gallon size in slopes), 5 and 15-gallon shrubs, and ground cover.
iii. Exposed dirt is prohibited.
iv.Bark or wood mulch is Wood chips are prohibited as a permanent and primary form of ground cover.
v.Decorative rock, with a minimum variety of three sizes/types, shall be used to cover areas that are not completely covered by plant material. Decorative rock shall not cover more than 25% of a planter area and shall have 3" base with weed barrier. Rock size should exceed three-quarter inch.
vi. A six-inch wide planter curbing is required along the perimeter of all landscaped areas. vii. All planter strips abutting a public right-of-way shall be a minimum of five feet in width and include six inch wide curbing abutting the required planter strip. viii. Where possible, infill projects should connect with adjacent landscaping by using similar plant types, sizes and arrangements.
ix. Landscaping should occur around the entire base of the building to soften the edge between the parking lot and the structure. This should be accented at entrances to provide focus.
x. Provide special landscaping treatments such as intensifying density (size and/or number) of trees and accent trees at all project entries. xi. Trees and shrubs should be located and spaced to allow for mature and long-term growth. Trees and shrubs should provide minimal root problems. xii. Formal planting designs and color-spots are encouraged in courtyards, plazas and in tree wells along the street frontages.
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
xiii. Planting should be used to screen less desirable areas from public view, i.e., trash enclosures, parking areas, storage areas, loading areas and public utilities. Use evergreen trees to screen unsightly features on-site or off-site. (10) Parking Lot Area Planting. Landscaping within parking lots should be given special consideration. These guidelines should provide a parking lot designer with the direction needed to create a functional and attractive parking environment. i. Appropriate lighting and landscaping should be provided, including shade trees and lampposts style (Refer to lighting Section of these Guidelines). ii. Areas not used for vehicle parking or maneuvering, or for the movement of pedestrians to and from vehicles should be used for landscaping.
iii. Trees should be distributed throughout the parking lot so as to maximize the aesthetic effect and compatibility with adjoining uses.
iv. Trees should be located throughout a parking lot and not merely at the ends of parking rows. Trees should be sized at 24-inch box or larger at the time of installation so as to provide shade to parked cars and add aesthetic appeal to the project. v. Planter islands and landscape fingers should have a minimum interior dimension of five (5) feet and should be located throughout the parking lot and at the end of all parking rows.
vi. Where parking spaces or drive aisles abut an interior lot line, a landscaped planter strip should be installed.
vii. Trash enclosures and loading areas provided in the parking areas shall be screened with landscaping and wall materials.
viii. Trash enclosures should be separated from adjacent parking stalls by minimum 3-foot wide planters with low-growing plant materials to ensure that adequate space is available for passengers to access a vehicle in an adjacent parking space. {Editing Note: Sec. 16-3.10.060(b)(9) & (10) only,
all other sections to remain as currently written}
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
Chapter 3: Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 11: Industrial Districts
Sec. 16-3.11.060: Design guidelines
(b) Site Planning and Design. Quality industrial site design should include controlled site access, service and loading areas located at the sides and rear of buildings, convenient access, visitor parking and on-site circulation, screening of outdoor storage, work areas, and equipment, emphasis on the main building entry and landscaping and landscaped open space.
(7) Landscaping
(i) Landscaping should be used to define areas by helping to focus on entrances to buildings, parking lots, and loading areas as well as defining the edges of various land uses, providing transition between neighboring properties (buffering), and providing screening for outdoor storage, loading and equipment areas. Enhanced planting, such as larger mature plants and/or closer spacing of plants, should be provided in areas highly visible from public views.
(ii) Native and low water use plants shall be used in developing the landscaping palette for a project (City Ordinance 2114).
(iii) Landscaping should consist of 24-inch, 36-inch and 48-inch box trees (15-gallon size in slopes), 5 and 15-gallon shrubs, and ground cover.
(iv) Exposed dirt is prohibited.
(v)Bark or wood mulch is Wood chips are prohibited as a permanent form of ground cover.
(vi) Decorative rock, with a minimum variety of three sizes/types, shall should be used to cover areas that are not completely covered by plant material. Exposed decorative rock shall not cover more than 25% of a planter area and shall have 3" base with weed barrier.
(vii)A six-inch wide planter curbing is required along the perimeter of all landscaped areas. (viii) All planter strips abutting a public right-of-way shall be a minimum of five feet in width and include six inch wide curbing abutting the required planter strip. (ix) Landscaping should be in scale with adjacent buildings and be of appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended goals.
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
Accent planting enhances building entries.
(x) Use of vines on walls is appropriate in industrial areas because such walls often tend to be large and blank.
(xi) Trees should be located throughout the parking lot and not simply at the ends of parking aisles. (Refer to the "Parking Lot Area Planting" Section). (xii)Trees and shrubs should be located and spaced to allow for mature and long-term growth. Trees and shrubs should provide minimal root problems. (xiii) Landscaping should occur at the entire base of the building to soften the edge between the parking lot and the structure. Accent planting should be used around entries and key activity hubs.
(xiv) Planting should be used to screen less desirable areas from public view, i.e., trash enclosures, parking areas, storage areas, loading areas, public utilities, and mechanical equipment.
(8) Parking Lot Area Planting
(i) Appropriate lighting and landscaping should be provided, including shade trees and lampposts style (Refer to lighting Section of these Guidelines).
Trees should be located throughout the parking lot and not merely at the ends of parking rows.
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
(ii) Areas not used for vehicle parking or maneuvering, or for the movement of pedestrians to and from vehicles should be used for landscaping.
(iii) Trees should be distributed throughout the parking lot so as to maximize the aesthetic effect and compatibility with adjoining uses.
(iv) Trees should be located throughout a parking lot and not merely at the ends of parking rows. Trees should be sized at 24-inch box or larger at the time of installation so as to provide shade to parked cars and add aesthetic appeal to the project. (v) Planter islands and landscape fingers should have a minimum interior dimension of five (5) feet and should be located throughout the parking lot and at the end of all parking rows.
(vi) Where parking spaces or drive aisles abut an interior lot line, a landscaped planter strip should be installed.
Attractive looking walls can be made using various materials and textures and by breaking up the wall plane.
(vii)Trash enclosures and loading areas provided in the parking areas shall be screened with landscaping and wall materials.
(viii) Trash enclosures should be separated from adjacent parking stalls by minimum 3- foot wide planters with low-growing plant materials to ensure that adequate space is available for passengers to access a vehicle in an adjacent parking space. {Editing Note: Sec. 16-3.11.060(b)(7) & (8) only,
all other sections to remain as currently written}
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
Chapter 3: Zoning and Land Use Requirements
Article 24: General Development Requirements and Exceptions Sec. 16-3.24.030: Landscape standards
The purpose of the landscaping requirements in this Section shall be to protect the general welfare by enhancing, conserving and encouraging pleasant and attractive surroundings in all zones of the City.
(a) General provisions applicable to all new development and existing lots:
(1) All landscaping shall be in accord with Section 13.60 of this Code and installed with a permanent irrigation system.
(2) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a neat, clean, orderly and healthful condition.
This includes proper pruning, mowing of lawns, removal of weeds, removal of litter, fertilizing, and replacement of plants where necessary, the regular watering of all plants and the repair of landscape edging/curbing. Property owners shall provide a means to keep decorative rock in-place (i.e. landscape edging, mow curbing, etc.). (3) All areas landscaped with decorative rock, pea gravel or decomposed granite (DG) shall include an unexposed permanent weed barrier. The weed barrier shall be opaque, breathable and permeable as well as durable (does not stretch or tear using bare hands).
Excluding single-family homes, weed barrier installation may be waived by the Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator if the soil is treated with a pre-emergent weed application prior to rock installation and the landscaping is regularly maintained by a licensed commercial landscaping business. Decorative rock shall be contained in place with the use of landscape edging/curbing to prevent scattering onto the sidewalk or driveways. All areas landscaped with decorative rock shall be treated and/or maintained regularly to control weeds.
(4) All front yard areas installed with drought tolerant landscaping or those converted from water intensive landscaping to drought tolerant landscaping, must permanently remain drought tolerant in accord with Section 13.60.
(b) Single-family landscape standards.
(1) Front yard landscape standards
(i) This section applies to all landscaping installed in small tract lots in conjunction with a building permit for a primary dwelling unit issued after 1-20-2015, the effective date of Ordinance No. 2322, and includes those installed as a part of a tract development or individual single-family homes.
(ii) All front and street yards visible from the street shall be covered with landscaping, excluding paved driveways and walkways, which shall be well-maintained and free of weeds.
(iii) All required front and street side yard areas, shall have a minimum of fifty (50) percent landscaping free of paved parking and driveway areas. Any areas used for pedestrian access or other landscape features utilizing paved areas shall be permitted administratively at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator or his designee.
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
(iv) Decorative rock, with a minimum variety of three sizes/types and minimum depth of 3”, shall be used as a permanent and primary form of groundcover within the front yard. Bark or wood mulch within the front and street side yard shall not be used as a permanent or primary form of ground cover within landscape areas, unless located within a flowerbed that is regularly maintained.
(v) Front and street side yard landscaping shall at a minimum include an arrangement or combination of trees (fifteen gallon minimum), shrubs, and live ground cover that is irrigated by an automatic drip or sprinkler watering system. In no case shall decorative rock exceed fifty (50) percent of landscaped area, which shall be calculated by excluding the spread of plants at maturity.
(vi) Front and street side yard landscaping shall be maintained with the requisite minimum amount and size of trees, shrubs, and live ground cover that was installed and approved in conjunction with the building permit that authorized its original installation. (2) Non-conforming front yard landscape standards
(i) This section applies to all existing landscaping within small tract lot subdivisions that was installed before the effective date of Ordinance No. 2322, 1-20-2015. (ii) All front and street yards visible from the street shall include landscaping, excluding paved driveways and walkways, which shall be well-maintained and free of weeds. (iii) All required front and street side yard areas shall have a minimum of fifty (50) percent free of paved parking and driveway areas. Any areas used for pedestrian access or other landscape features utilizing paved areas shall be permitted administratively at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator or his designee. (iv) Decorative rock with a minimum depth of 3” shall be used as a permanent and primary form of groundcover. Bark or wood mulch within the front and street side yard shall not be used as a permanent or primary form of ground cover within landscape areas, unless located within a flowerbed that is regularly maintained. Exposed dirt is prohibited.
(v) Front and street side yard landscaping shall at a minimum include an arrangement or combination of trees (fifteen gallon minimum), shrubs, and live ground cover that is irrigated by a drip or sprinkler watering system. Plant material should produce a minimum twenty-five (25) percent yard coverage calculated at plant maturity. In no case shall exposed decorative rock exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the landscaped area at maturity.
(vi) Should applicable city records be available for confirmation, front and street side yard landscaping shall be maintained with a matching amount and size of trees, shrubs, and live ground cover that was installed and approved in conjunction with the building permit that authorized its original installation, if in compliance with Water Efficient Landscaping standards outlined in Chapter 13.60 of Title 13 of this Code. (1) All front and street side yards visible from the street shall be covered with landscaping, excluding paved driveways and walkways.
(2) All required front and street side yard areas, shall have a minimum of fifty (50) percent landscaping free of paved parking and driveway areas. Any areas used for pedestrian access or other landscape features utilizing paved areas shall be permitted administratively at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator or his designee.
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
(3) Bark or mulch within the front and street side yard shall not be used as a permanent form of ground cover within landscape areas, unless located within a flowerbed that is regularly maintained.
(4) Front and street side yard landscaping shall at a minimum include an arrangement or combination of trees (fifteen gallon minimum), shrubs, and live ground cover. In no case shall decorative rock exceed fifty (50) percent of landscaped area, which shall be calculated by excluding the spread of plants at maturity. (5)(3)Exceptions to single-family landscape standards:
(i) Existing small tract lots covered with landscaping and well-maintained, as so required by this Title, shall not be required to comply with subsection (4). (ii) Existing non-small tract lots shall not be subject to subsections (1) and (2) through (4); however, any lot with previous or currently existing landscaping shall be maintained and free of weeds, as required by this Title or any associated entitlement. (c) Multi-family landscape standards. All areas of the site not occupied by buildings, improvements for the storage of vehicles and access thereto, or improved recreational facility shall be landscaped. Submission of a landscape plan shall be required for all multi-family residential housing. All existing multi-family residential housing that fails to comply with this regulation shall have two years from the effective date of approval of the requirements to submit and gain approval of a landscape plan and install said landscaping. Landscape plans shall be submitted for administrative approval in accordance with the following standards:
(1) The type of plants used for landscaping shall be able to survive in the local climate. (2)Decorative rock, with a minimum variety of three sizes/types, shall be used as a permanent form of groundcover. Bark or wood mulch shall not be used as a permanent and primary form of ground cover within landscape areas, unless located within a flowerbed that is regularly maintained. Exposed dirt within landscaped areas is prohibited.
(3) Plans shall include a variety of plant types such as ground covers, shrubs, trees and turf. The use of decorative rock shall not exceed 25% of the landscape area. Further, the landscape plan shall include the maximum spacing of all plants as follows:
(i) Ground cover - eighteen inches on center.
(ii) One gallon plants - three feet on center.
(iii) Five gallon plants - five feet on center.
(4) Plants used for required screening purposes (trash enclosures, storage areas, utility equipment) shall be a minimum of five gallon size and spaced at a maximum of four feet on center.
(5) Every site shall contain at least two 24-inch box trees for each half acre of lot size. (6) Parking lots within multi-family developments shall meet the development standards listed within subsection (d).
(d) Landscaping requirements for nonresidential lots and parking areas are as follows:
(1) All non-residential lots which abut a dedicated street shall have a planter strip along the entire property abutting the dedicated street, excluding all driveway approaches. The planter strip shall have a minimum interior width of five feet. Properties along Highways 18 (Palmdale Road) and 395 shall have a planter strip with a minimum interior width of Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
ten feet to accommodate any applicable development standards for landscape palettes for thoroughfares.
(2) All nonresidential parking areas requiring four or more parking stalls shall provide the following interior and peripheral landscaping:
(i) All landscaping areas shall be surrounded by a concrete curb or other approved curbing having a minimum height and width of not less than six inches, including planters that abut the public right-of-way sidewalk. Landscaped areas without curbing may be substituted upon review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. (ii) A minimum five-foot interior width landscape planter strip where any parking spaces and/or drive aisles abut an interior lot line or building. (iii) One twenty-four-inch box tree with approved ground cover for every eight parking spaces evenly dispersed throughout the parking area within landscape fingers or tree wells:
(A) Landscape fingers and tree wells shall have a minimum interior width of five feet as measured perpendicularly from side curb;
(B) Tree wells are only permitted when parking spaces are in double stacked rows, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission when utilized to increase compliance with the Commercial Design Guidelines; and (C) Double stacked landscape fingers shall have a minimum of two twenty-four- inch box trees.
(iv) A minimum five-foot interior width planter island shall be located at the end of every parking aisle/row.
(v) All landscaping areas shall be surrounded by a concrete curb or other approved curbing having a minimum height and width of not less than six inches. Landscaped areas without curbing may be substituted upon review and approval of the Director of Planning.
(viv) All parking spaces abutting landscape areas shall include access and maintenance measures as follows:
(A) Landscape areas used as front parking space overhang area shall include two feet additional interior width and be paved in accordance with Figure 21- 3 entitled "Concrete Curb/Wheel Stop" or be landscaped with durable ground cover that will not damage vehicles and be designed exclusive of the minimum required planter widths; and
(B) Landscape areas abutting the side of parking spaces, excluding individual tree wells, shall include one foot additional interior width and be paved to allow for vehicle doors to open freely and not impede passenger access to or from vehicles.
(viivi) All landscaped areas shall be provided with a suitable permanent water system.
(viiivii) Required planters shall not exceed a three foot horizontal to one foot vertical slope ratio.
Resolution No. P-25-006 - PLAN24-00023 January 8, 2025
(ixviii) Rock ground cover shall not exceed twenty-five percent of the total for any landscaped area and such structural features as fountains, pools or art works, but such objects alone shall not meet the requirements of this Section. (xix) The maximum spacing of all plants within the parking area is as follows:
(A) Ground cover—eighteen inches on center.
(B) One gallon plants—three feet on center.
(C) Five gallon plants—five feet on center.
(e) Landscaping Maintenance. All landscaped areas and approved curbing shall be maintained in a neat, clean, orderly and healthful condition. This includes proper pruning, mowing of lawns, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, replacement of plants where necessary, the regular watering of all planting and the repair of landscaped curbing.
Chapter 4: Subdivision Regulations (Private Development) Article 2: Tentative Maps
Sec. 16-4.02.030: Expiration of tentative map approval
(a) An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire thirty-six forty-eight months after its approval or conditional approval. Additional automatic extensions to the approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall be in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. (b) Upon application of the subdivider filed prior to the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, the time at which the map expires may be extended by the Planning Commission for any period deemed appropriate and allowed under the Subdivision Map Act. (c) For the purposes of tentative map expiration, "timely filing" of the final map, means the receipt of any outside agency approvals, compliance with conditions of approval, acceptance of improvement security after all required certificates or statements on the map have been signed and/or acknowledged, and completed plan check without required corrections. as provided for by Section 66452.6 (d) of the Subdivision Map Act, is defined as acceptance of the final map on mylar by the City Engineer, as well as the completion of the following requirements:
(i) Signed completion of all required certificates and statements (Surveyor’s or Engineer’s Statement, Owners’ Statement, County Auditor’s Certificate, and County Board of Supervisors’ Certificate);
(ii) Receipt of any outside agency approvals;
(iii) Compliance with the adopted Planning Commission or City Council Conditions of Approval, as applicable;
(iv) Acceptance of the subdivision improvement agreement and security; and (v)Submission of public improvement plans on mylar for approval by the City Engineer.
PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTACHMENT B
State Assembly Bill 2632 (2024)
SHARE THIS:
Date Published: 09/30/2024 09:00 PM
AB-2632 Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. (2023-2024) Assembly Bill No. 2632
CHAPTER 728
An act to add Article 10.11 (commencing with Section 65630) to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, relating to land use.
[ Approved by Governor September 27, 2024. Filed with Secretary of State September 27, 2024. ]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2632, Wilson. Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. (1) Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, among other things, requires the legislative body of each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city and of any land outside its boundaries that relates to its planning. Existing law authorizes the legislative body, if it deems it to be in the public interest, to amend all or part of an adopted general plan, as provided. Existing law also authorizes the legislative body of any county or city, pursuant to specified procedures, to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, open space, and other purposes.
This bill would prohibit a local agency, as defined, from treating a thrift retail store, as defined, differently from a nonthrift retail store engaged in the sale of new items that are similar to items sold by a thrift retail store for purposes of zoning, development standards, or permitting, except as specified. The bill would allow a local agency to require that thrift retail stores meet certain aesthetic or design standards, as prescribed. The bill would prohibit a local agency from prohibiting a thrift retail store from receiving used and donated items for sale in the store or other thrift retail stores, or reuse or recycling, or both reuse and recycling, through other means.
By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions shall be construed to, among other things, prohibit the adoption or enforcement of reasonable local rules or ordinances on retail establishments engaged in the sale of new items that are similar to items sold by a thrift retail store. (2) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Home Bill Information California LawPublicationsOther ResourcesMy SubscriptionsMy Favorites 12/18/24, 10:04 AM Bill Text - AB-2632 Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2632 1/3 Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Article 10.11 (commencing with Section 65630) is added to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, to read:
Article 10.11. Thrift Retail Stores
65630. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1) The 2020 annual report, as published by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, found that California is falling far short of the state diversion goal of 75 percent in 2020. (2) A significant portion of the waste stream into California landfills is composed of clothing and household goods that have not reached the end of their usefulness. Discarded clothing remains the largest source of textile waste in the world, with the average United States citizen throwing away 81 pounds of clothing each year, 95 percent of which could have been reworn or repurposed. Yet, 85 percent of this material ends up in landfills. According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, one garbage truck of textiles is landfilled or incinerated every second.
(3) California faces a growing problem in siting and approving sufficient landfill space. Landfill siting and the expansion of current landfill facilities are controversial and landfills create the potential for significant adverse environmental impacts.
(4) Discarding still-usable clothing and household goods increase greenhouse gas emissions by stimulating production of replacement goods and adding greenhouse gas emissions along the continuum of product manufacture, transportation, warehousing, and delivery. (5) Recent years have seen an increase in consumer interest in purchasing used clothing and smaller household items from retail establishments that specialize in selling such goods, commonly referred to as “thrifting” and “thrift” retail establishments. Thrift accounted for approximately 60 percent of the total secondhand market in 2021. As of June 2022, more than one in three shoppers in the United States, and nearly one-half of Canadian shoppers, surveyed reported caring more about the environmental impact of their apparel choices today than they did three years ago.
(6) Thrift retail establishments are identical to other retail establishments in terms of local impacts on traffic, parking, and other land use topics. In addition, given that thrift establishments divert reusable goods from landfills in furtherance of important statewide policy, those establishments provide environmental benefits that nonthrift retail establishments do not.
(b) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature that local governments be prohibited from classifying or otherwise treating thrift retail establishments differently than nonthrift retail establishments, subject to certain limitations contained in this article.
65631. For purposes of this article, the following definitions apply:
(a) “Thrift retail store” means a retail store and related donation facilities engaged primarily in the sale of secondhand clothing, shoes, apparel, toys, and standard household goods, including furniture, fixtures, and small household appliances, and the collection of those goods for resale. “Thrift retail store” does not include the sale of large household appliances such as refrigerators or stoves and does not include the sale of cars or anything automotive-related.
(b) “Local agency” means a city, including a charter city, a county, or a city and county. 65632. (a) Except as provided by subdivisions (c) to (e), inclusive, a local agency shall not treat a thrift retail store differently from a nonthrift retail store engaged in the sale of new items that are similar to items sold by a thrift retail store for purposes of zoning, development standards, including, but not limited to, height, size, parking requirements, or setbacks from adjacent uses, or permitting. A local agency may also require that thrift retail stores meet certain aesthetic or design standards, including design review approval, provided those standards or design review, or both, are also required of nonthrift retail stores. 12/18/24, 10:04 AM Bill Text - AB-2632 Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2632 2/3 (b) A local agency shall not prohibit a thrift retail store from receiving used and donated items for sale in the store or other thrift retail stores, or reuse or recycling, or both reuse and recycling, through other means. (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the adoption or enforcement of reasonable local rules or ordinances on retail establishments engaged in the sale of new items that are similar to items sold by a thrift retail store.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the adoption or enforcement of reasonable local rules or ordinances on the collection or receipt of used and donated items by a thrift retail store, including, but not limited to, reasonable local rules or ordinances related to any of the following:
(1) Requirements that the delivery of goods or donations is conducted within a specified area of the premises of a thrift retail store.
(2) Requirements that any donation be accepted only during business hours. (3) Requirements that the donation process is operated by employees of the thrift retail store and that the donations of goods from the public are collected and received by employees of the thrift retail store. (4) Limitations on the square footage or percentage of the thrift retail store premises within which collecting and receiving activities are conducted.
(5) Requirements applicable to the operation of equipment associated with the collection, receipt, processing, or disposal of used and donated goods.
(6) Enforcement of health and safety standards including, but not limited to, standards relating to shopping center ingress and egress or the enforcement of illegal dumping. (e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the ability of a local agency to adopt or enforce any local rules or ordinances on businesses other than thrift retail stores.
SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that reducing the waste stream of discarded clothing and household goods to state landfills by facilitating the siting of thrift retail establishments is a matter of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution.
Therefore, Section 1 of this act, adding Article 10.11 (commencing with Section 65630) to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, applies to all cities, including charter cities.
SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
12/18/24, 10:04 AM Bill Text - AB-2632 Planning and zoning: thrift retail stores. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2632 3/3
PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTACHMENT C
State Senate Bill 9 (2021)
SHARE THIS:
Date Published: 09/17/2021 09:00 PM
SB-9 Housing development: approvals. (2021-2022)
Senate Bill No. 9
CHAPTER 162
An act to amend Section 66452.6 of, and to add Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to, the Government Code, relating to land use.
[ Approved by Governor September 16, 2021. Filed with Secretary of State September 16, 2021. ]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 9, Atkins. Housing development: approvals.
The Planning and Zoning Law provides for the creation of accessory dwelling units by local ordinance, or, if a local agency has not adopted an ordinance, by ministerial approval, in accordance with specified standards and conditions.
This bill, among other things, would require a proposed housing development containing no more than 2 residential units within a single-family residential zone to be considered ministerially, without discretionary review or hearing, if the proposed housing development meets certain requirements, including, but not limited to, that the proposed housing development would not require demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income, that the proposed housing development does not allow for the demolition of more than 25% of the existing exterior structural walls, except as provided, and that the development is not located within a historic district, is not included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or is not within a site that is legally designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district.
The bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving the construction of 2 residential units, including, but not limited to, authorizing a local agency to impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, as defined, unless those standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to 2 units or physically precluding either of the 2 units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, prohibiting the imposition of setback requirements under certain circumstances, and setting maximum setback requirements under all other circumstances.
The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the local agency’s processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps, and the modification of those maps. Under the Subdivision Map Act, an approved or conditionally approved tentative map expires 24 months after its approval or conditional approval or after any additional period of time as prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed an additional 12 months, except as provided.
Home Bill Information California LawPublicationsOther ResourcesMy SubscriptionsMy Favorites 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 1/8 This bill, among other things, would require a local agency to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split that meets certain requirements, including, but not limited to, that the urban lot split would not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income, that the parcel is located within a single-family residential zone, and that the parcel is not located within a historic district, is not included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or is not within a site that is legally designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district.
The bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving an urban lot split, including, but not limited to, authorizing a local agency to impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, as defined, unless those standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of 2 units, as defined, on either of the resulting parcels or physically precluding either of the 2 units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, prohibiting the imposition of setback requirements under certain circumstances, and setting maximum setback requirements under all other circumstances. The bill would require an applicant to sign an affidavit stating that they intend to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of 3 years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split, unless the applicant is a community land trust or a qualified nonprofit corporation, as specified. The bill would prohibit a local agency from imposing any additional owner occupancy standards on applicants. By requiring applicants to sign affidavits, thereby expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would also extend the limit on the additional period that may be provided by ordinance, as described above, from 12 months to 24 months and would make other conforming or nonsubstantive changes.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA does not apply to the approval of ministerial projects.
This bill, by establishing the ministerial review processes described above, would thereby exempt the approval of projects subject to those processes from CEQA.
The California Coastal Act of 1976 provides for the planning and regulation of development, under a coastal development permit process, within the coastal zone, as defined, that shall be based on various coastal resources planning and management policies set forth in the act.
This bill would exempt a local agency from being required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for housing developments and urban lot splits pursuant to the above provisions.
By increasing the duties of local agencies with respect to land use regulations, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program.
The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 65852.21 is added to the Government Code, to read:
65852.21. (a) A proposed housing development containing no more than two residential units within a single- family residential zone shall be considered ministerially, without discretionary review or a hearing, if the proposed housing development meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The parcel subject to the proposed housing development is located within a city, the boundaries of which include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau. 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 2/8 (2) The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
(3) Notwithstanding any provision of this section or any local law, the proposed housing development would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(A) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. (B) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(C) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (4) The parcel subject to the proposed housing development is not a parcel on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner’s rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
(5) The proposed housing development does not allow the demolition of more than 25 percent of the existing exterior structural walls, unless the housing development meets at least one of the following conditions:
(A) If a local ordinance so allows.
(B) The site has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (6) The development is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding any local law and except as provided in paragraph (2), a local agency may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards that do not conflict with this section.
(2) (A) The local agency shall not impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two units or that would physically preclude either of the two units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area. (B) (i) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (ii) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), in all other circumstances not described in clause (i), a local agency may require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines. (c) In addition to any conditions established in accordance with subdivision (b), a local agency may require any of the following conditions when considering an application for two residential units as provided for in this section:
(1) Off-street parking of up to one space per unit, except that a local agency shall not impose parking requirements in either of the following instances:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop, as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel. (2) For residential units connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, a percolation test completed within the last 5 years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years. (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a local agency may deny a proposed housing development project if the building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 3/8 (e) A local agency shall require that a rental of any unit created pursuant to this section be for a term longer than 30 days.
(f) Notwithstanding Section 65852.2 or 65852.22, a local agency shall not be required to permit an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit on parcels that use both the authority contained within this section and the authority contained in Section 66411.7. (g) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), an application shall not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance. (h) Local agencies shall include units constructed pursuant to this section in the annual housing element report as required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400. (i) For purposes of this section, all of the following apply:
(1) A housing development contains two residential units if the development proposes no more than two new units or if it proposes to add one new unit to one existing unit. (2) The terms “objective zoning standards,” “objective subdivision standards,” and “objective design review standards” mean standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. These standards may be embodied in alternative objective land use specifications adopted by a local agency, and may include, but are not limited to, housing overlay zones, specific plans, inclusionary zoning ordinances, and density bonus ordinances.
(3) “Local agency” means a city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered. (j) A local agency may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of this section. An ordinance adopted to implement this section shall not be considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(k) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the local agency shall not be required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for a housing development pursuant to this section.
SEC. 2. Section 66411.7 is added to the Government Code, to read:
66411.7. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this division and any local law, a local agency shall ministerially approve, as set forth in this section, a parcel map for an urban lot split only if the local agency determines that the parcel map for the urban lot split meets all the following requirements:
(1) The parcel map subdivides an existing parcel to create no more than two new parcels of approximately equal lot area provided that one parcel shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision.
(2) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), both newly created parcels are no smaller than 1,200 square feet.
(B) A local agency may by ordinance adopt a smaller minimum lot size subject to ministerial approval under this subdivision.
(3) The parcel being subdivided meets all the following requirements:
(A) The parcel is located within a single-family residential zone. (B) The parcel subject to the proposed urban lot split is located within a city, the boundaries of which include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau. (C) The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 4/8 (D) The proposed urban lot split would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(i) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. (ii) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(iii) A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner’s rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
(iv) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (E) The parcel is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance. (F) The parcel has not been established through prior exercise of an urban lot split as provided for in this section.
(G) Neither the owner of the parcel being subdivided nor any person acting in concert with the owner has previously subdivided an adjacent parcel using an urban lot split as provided for in this section. (b) An application for a parcel map for an urban lot split shall be approved in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) A local agency shall approve or deny an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split ministerially without discretionary review.
(2) A local agency shall approve an urban lot split only if it conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410)), except as otherwise expressly provided in this section.
(3) Notwithstanding Section 66411.1, a local agency shall not impose regulations that require dedications of rights-of-way or the construction of offsite improvements for the parcels being created as a condition of issuing a parcel map for an urban lot split pursuant to this section. (c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), notwithstanding any local law, a local agency may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards applicable to a parcel created by an urban lot split that do not conflict with this section. (2) A local agency shall not impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet. (3) (A) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (B) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), in all other circumstances not described in subparagraph (A), a local agency may require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines. (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a local agency may deny an urban lot split if the building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. (e) In addition to any conditions established in accordance with this section, a local agency may require any of the following conditions when considering an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split:
(1) Easements required for the provision of public services and facilities. (2) A requirement that the parcels have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way. 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 5/8 (3) Off-street parking of up to one space per unit, except that a local agency shall not impose parking requirements in either of the following instances:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel. (f) A local agency shall require that the uses allowed on a lot created by this section be limited to residential uses.
(g) (1) A local agency shall require an applicant for an urban lot split to sign an affidavit stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split.
(2) This subdivision shall not apply to an applicant that is a “community land trust,” as defined in clause (ii) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or is a “qualified nonprofit corporation” as described in Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. (3) A local agency shall not impose additional owner occupancy standards, other than provided for in this subdivision, on an urban lot split pursuant to this section. (h) A local agency shall require that a rental of any unit created pursuant to this section be for a term longer than 30 days.
(i) A local agency shall not require, as a condition for ministerial approval of a parcel map application for the creation of an urban lot split, the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions. (j) (1) Notwithstanding any provision of Section 65852.2, 65852.21, 65852.22, 65915, or this section, a local agency shall not be required to permit more than two units on a parcel created through the exercise of the authority contained within this section.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “unit” means any dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, a unit or units created pursuant to Section 65852.21, a primary dwelling, an accessory dwelling unit as defined in Section 65852.2, or a junior accessory dwelling unit as defined in Section 65852.22. (k) Notwithstanding paragraph (3) of subdivision (c), an application shall not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
(l) Local agencies shall include the number of applications for parcel maps for urban lot splits pursuant to this section in the annual housing element report as required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400.
(m) For purposes of this section, both of the following shall apply:
(1) “Objective zoning standards,” “objective subdivision standards,” and “objective design review standards” mean standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. These standards may be embodied in alternative objective land use specifications adopted by a local agency, and may include, but are not limited to, housing overlay zones, specific plans, inclusionary zoning ordinances, and density bonus ordinances.
(2) “Local agency” means a city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered. (n) A local agency may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of this section. An ordinance adopted to implement this section shall not be considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(o) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the local agency shall not be required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for urban lot splits pursuant to this section. 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 6/8 SEC. 3. Section 66452.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:
66452.6. (a) (1) An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after its approval or conditional approval, or after any additional period of time as may be prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed an additional 24 months. However, if the subdivider is required to expend two hundred thirty-six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($236,790) or more to construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, excluding improvements of public rights-of-way that abut the boundary of the property to be subdivided and that are reasonably related to the development of that property, each filing of a final map authorized by Section 66456.1 shall extend the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by 48 months from the date of its expiration, as provided in this section, or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map more than 10 years from its approval or conditional approval.
However, a tentative map on property subject to a development agreement authorized by Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 65864) of Chapter 4 of Division 1 may be extended for the period of time provided for in the agreement, but not beyond the duration of the agreement. The number of phased final maps that may be filed shall be determined by the advisory agency at the time of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map.
(2) Commencing January 1, 2012, and each calendar year thereafter, the amount of two hundred thirty-six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($236,790) shall be annually increased by operation of law according to the adjustment for inflation set forth in the statewide cost index for class B construction, as determined by the State Allocation Board at its January meeting. The effective date of each annual adjustment shall be March 1.
The adjusted amount shall apply to tentative and vesting tentative maps whose applications were received after the effective date of the adjustment.
(3) “Public improvements,” as used in this subdivision, include traffic controls, streets, roads, highways, freeways, bridges, overcrossings, street interchanges, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, and lighting facilities.
(b) (1) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any extension thereof granted pursuant to subdivision (e), shall not include any period of time during which a development moratorium, imposed after approval of the tentative map, is in existence. However, the length of the moratorium shall not exceed five years. (2) The length of time specified in paragraph (1) shall be extended for up to three years, but in no event beyond January 1, 1992, during the pendency of any lawsuit in which the subdivider asserts, and the local agency that approved or conditionally approved the tentative map denies, the existence or application of a development moratorium to the tentative map.
(3) Once a development moratorium is terminated, the map shall be valid for the same period of time as was left to run on the map at the time that the moratorium was imposed. However, if the remaining time is less than 120 days, the map shall be valid for 120 days following the termination of the moratorium. (c) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any extension thereof granted pursuant to subdivision (e), shall not include the period of time during which a lawsuit involving the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map is or was pending in a court of competent jurisdiction, if the stay of the time period is approved by the local agency pursuant to this section. After service of the initial petition or complaint in the lawsuit upon the local agency, the subdivider may apply to the local agency for a stay pursuant to the local agency’s adopted procedures. Within 40 days after receiving the application, the local agency shall either stay the time period for up to five years or deny the requested stay. The local agency may, by ordinance, establish procedures for reviewing the requests, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirements, appeal procedures, and other administrative requirements.
(d) The expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall terminate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map of all or any portion of the real property included within the tentative map shall be filed with the legislative body without first processing a new tentative map. Once a timely filing is made, subsequent actions of the local agency, including, but not limited to, processing, approving, and recording, may lawfully occur after the date of expiration of the tentative map. Delivery to the county surveyor or city engineer shall be deemed a timely filing for purposes of this section. (e) Upon application of the subdivider filed before the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, the time at which the map expires pursuant to subdivision (a) may be extended by the legislative body or by an advisory agency authorized to approve or conditionally approve tentative maps for a period or 12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 7/8 periods not exceeding a total of six years. The period of extension specified in this subdivision shall be in addition to the period of time provided by subdivision (a). Before the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map, upon an application by the subdivider to extend that map, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs first. If the advisory agency denies a subdivider’s application for an extension, the subdivider may appeal to the legislative body within 15 days after the advisory agency has denied the extension. (f) For purposes of this section, a development moratorium includes a water or sewer moratorium, or a water and sewer moratorium, as well as other actions of public agencies that regulate land use, development, or the provision of services to the land, including the public agency with the authority to approve or conditionally approve the tentative map, which thereafter prevents, prohibits, or delays the approval of a final or parcel map.
A development moratorium shall also be deemed to exist for purposes of this section for any period of time during which a condition imposed by the city or county could not be satisfied because of either of the following:
(1) The condition was one that, by its nature, necessitated action by the city or county, and the city or county either did not take the necessary action or by its own action or inaction was prevented or delayed in taking the necessary action before expiration of the tentative map. (2) The condition necessitates acquisition of real property or any interest in real property from a public agency, other than the city or county that approved or conditionally approved the tentative map, and that other public agency fails or refuses to convey the property interest necessary to satisfy the condition. However, nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to require any public agency to convey any interest in real property owned by it. A development moratorium specified in this paragraph shall be deemed to have been imposed either on the date of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map, if evidence was included in the public record that the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein may refuse to convey that property or interest, or on the date that the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein receives an offer by the subdivider to purchase that property or interest for fair market value, whichever is later. A development moratorium specified in this paragraph shall extend the tentative map up to the maximum period as set forth in subdivision (b), but not later than January 1, 1992, so long as the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein fails or refuses to convey the necessary property interest, regardless of the reason for the failure or refusal, except that the development moratorium shall be deemed to terminate 60 days after the public agency has officially made, and communicated to the subdivider, a written offer or commitment binding on the agency to convey the necessary property interest for a fair market value, paid in a reasonable time and manner.
SEC. 4. The Legislature finds and declares that ensuring access to affordable housing is a matter of statewide concern and not a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution.
Therefore, Sections 1 and 2 of this act adding Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to the Government Code and Section 3 of this act amending Section 66452.6 of the Government Code apply to all cities, including charter cities.
SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act or because costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
12/18/24, 10:06 AM Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development: approvals. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB9 8/8
PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTACHMENT D
Eligible Tract Maps
PLAN24-00023
Eligible Tentative Tract Maps
Retroactive Tentative Tract Map Extensions
Case No. Number
of Lots
Approval
Date
Current
Expiration
Proposed
Expiration
Dev.
Agreement
PLAN20-00008 18 01/13/2021 01/13/2024 01/13/2025 N/A
PLAN18-00039 194 02/09/2022 02/09/2025 02/09/2026 N/A
PLAN22-00012 319 07/19/2022 07/19/2023 N/A 1 yr. Ext.
PLAN21-00040 152 8/10/2022 08/10/2025 08/10/2026 N/A
PLAN23-00004 6 03/08/2023 03/08/2026 03/08/2027 Wellness Ctr.
PLAN23-00013 319 07/12/2023 07/13/2026 N/A 1 yr. Ext.
PLAN22-00032 72 10/27/2023 10/27/2026 10/27/2027 N/A
PLAN22-00028 210 02/27/2024 02/24/2027 02/24/2028 N/A
PLAN23-00015 132 03/14/2024 03/14/2027 03/13/2028 N/A
PLAN21-00006 298 04/10/2024 04/12/2027 04/12/2028 N/A
PLAN22-00015 108 05/08/2024 05/10/2027 05/10/2028 N/A
PLAN21-00033 107 09/11/2024 09/13/2027 09/13/2028 N/A
PLAN22-00033 61 09/11/2024 09/13/2027 09/13/2028 N/A
PLAN22-00011 131 10/09/2024 10/11/2027 10/11/2028 N/A
PLAN22-00029 53 12/11/2024 12/13/2027 12/13/2028 N/A
PLAN21-00039 39 12/11/2024 12/13/2027 12/13/2028 N/A
Revision to Agenda
Item #4
Item Number: 3
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing(s)
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Mid-Year Budget Review and Amendment Request to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Revised Fiscal Budget
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council and Board of Directors approve the changes reflected in this agenda item along with the included attachments by adopting:
(1) Resolution No. 25-013 of the City Council of the City of Victorville amending Resolution 24-037, as amended, the budget resolution for the City of Victorville for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, relating to an appropriation of funds. (2) Resolution No. VWD-25-003 of the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District amending Resolution VWD-24-006, as amended, the budget resolution for the Victorville Water District for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, relating to an appropriation of funds.
(3) Resolution No. SCLAA-25-003 of the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority amending Resolution SCLAA-24-003, as amended, the budget resolution for the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, relating to an appropriation of funds.
(4) Resolution No. CHAS 25-001 of the City Council of the City of Victorville as the Housing Asset Successor to the Victorville Redevelopment Agency amending Resolution CHAS 24-003, as amended, the budget resolution for the City as the Housing Asset Successor for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, relating to an appropriation of funds.
(5) Resolution No. LBT 25-001 of the Library Board of Trustees amending Resolution No. LBT 24-002, as amended, the budget resolution for the Victorville Library for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, relating to an appropriation of funds. 3 9
9 8
Fiscal Impact:
Approval of this agenda item would result in an increase of $3,229,874.87 in the total citywide expenditures and an increase of $2,973,106.64 in the total revenue budget for the Fiscal Year 2024-2025.
A summary of the Mid-Year budget changes are as follows (Attachment A):
•City of Victorville – An appropriation of funds, increasing the expenditures by $3,346,555.67 and increasing the revenue by $1,183,172.60. •Victorville Water District – An appropriation of funds, decreasing the expenditures by $144,632.91 and increasing the revenue by $1,898,894.32. •Southern California Logistics Airport Authority – An appropriation of funds, decreasing expenditures by $60,666.52 and decreasing the revenue by $108,960.28.
•Housing Asset Successor – An appropriation of funds, increasing the expenditures by $65,745.53.
•Library – An appropriation of funds, increasing the expenditures by $22,873.10.
Strategic Plan Goal:
A.Financial Sustainability Goal – foster disciplined long-term planning, cost control, increased revenues, and cost recovery.
•Updated multi-year cash flows were presented to the Executive Team to ensure current year actions were sustainable and planning and forethought were put into the current and future City needs. Staff continues thinking of ways to sustain and improve programs while protecting the City against unexpected expenses or economic fluctuations.
B.Public Safety Goal – implement strategies to support a growing community. •Measure P funding continues to support the Public Safety Plan and increase staffing and resources for Police, Fire, Code Compliance and Animal Control.
This includes funding a reserve for the continued replacement of aging fire apparatus, improvements to the fire stations, additional medical and fire equipment, reserve funding for the new police station, and continued funding of additional code compliance and animal control staff to support a pro-active approach for our community.
C.Reduce Homelessness Goal – implement effective solutions to reduce Homelessness.
•The City continues to address the issues of homelessness through our new Wellness Center and working with external agencies toward integrated solutions for our business and residential communities.
D.Invest in Infrastructure Goal – create a healthy-livable community by investing in infrastructure and innovations.
•The City is focusing on infrastructure projects for FY 2024-2025 that include several roof replacements, upgrading booster stations and valve replacements to ensure continuous water availability, and several road pavement projects.
E.Organizational Effectiveness and Sustainability Goal – provide high-quality services utilizing local government best practices, employee development, support, and retention.
3 9
9 8
•The City continues to focus on its employees through promotion of the core values of customer service, transparency, integrity, and accountability. A focus on training and education reflect the continued desire to invest in the development, support, and retention of our growing staff. This enables the City to continue our priorities to provide the best access to city services as well as continuous improvements in customer service for our residents and businesses.
Background:
The Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget, effective July 1, 2024, was adopted by the City Council/Board of Directors on June 4, 2024. The Mid-Year Budget Review provides the City with an opportunity to assess the overall performance of its revenues and expenditures, with the intent to proactively respond to unforeseen changes and emerging trends. It also allows departments to re-evaluate their operations, identify any unanticipated needs and propose necessary budget amendments to ensure the continued efficient operation of the City.
Discussion:
The following chart compares the City-wide Fiscal Year 2024-2025 adopted budget, revised budget and December 2024 year-to-date (YTD) totals for revenue and expenditures. The column labeled “FY 2024-2025 Revised Budget” reflects the Council- approved budget including any Council-approved resolutions for additional appropriations through December 31,2024.
Citywide
FY 2024-2025
Adopted
Budget
FY 2024-2025
Revised Budget
Actuals Through
12/31/24
% Received /
Expended
Revenue $354,521,440 $361,654,062 $151,100,983 42%
Expenditures $377,874,602 $456,052,571 $129,595,604 28% *Note: FY 2024-2025 Adopted Budget includes $59.7 million in Capital Improvement Projects.
As of December 31, 2024, the City has received $151,100,982.88 in revenue across all funds, representing 42% of the total revised revenue budget of $361,654,062.
Expenditures to date total $129,595,603.56, or 28% of the revised expenditure budget of $456,052,571. Revenue collection is currently in line with projections while expenditures are below budget expectations.
To accurately align with the current operational needs of the various departments, several budget adjustments are necessary. These adjustments will result in an approximate increase of $2,973,106.64 in revenue and $3,229,874.87 in expenditures across all funds.
A detailed breakdown of each major change, categorized by fund type (General Fund, Measure P Fund, Special Revenue Funds also known as Other Governmental Funds, and Enterprise Funds) is provided herein.
3 9
9 8
Overview of Major Changes and Recommended Adjustments by Fund Type:
General Fund (100):
General Fund FY2024-2025
Revised Budget
Request Increase
(Decrease)
Mid-Year
Proposed Budget
Revenue $101,065,518 $ 720,955 $101,786,473
Expenditures $107,009,469 $2,794,591 $109,804,060
General Fund revenues are projected to increase by $720,954.60 driven by several key factors, including the following:
•Engineering revenue is projected to increase by $697,000 reflecting the current level of development activity. This increase is primarily attributed to a rise in demand for services such as Traffic Studies, Drainage Studies, Improvement Plan Check Fees, and Inspection Fees, all of which are driven by ongoing new tract development within the city.
•Police Towed Vehicles Administration Fee revenue is expected to increase by $90,000, significantly exceeding initial projections. In the first 6 months, this revenue source has already surpassed expectations, averaging approximately $20,000 per month.
•Animal License revenue is projected to increase by $10,000. This increase is attributed to the effects of the passage of Urgency Ordinance No. 2439, Section 2, which waived the license fee for adopted animals during the first year 2023-2024.
This waiver encouraged more pet adoptions, resulting in a higher number of licenses now due for renewal.
•Based on the recently adopted fee study, a reduction in revenue is projected for Plumbing Permit Fees ($40,000), Electrical Permit Fees ($45,000), and Mechanical Permit Plan Check Fees ($45,000) due to the elimination of these respective fees. It is anticipated that this revenue stream will be fully eliminated by the next fiscal year.
General Fund expenditures are projected to increase by $2,794,590.63 for the following reasons:
•The Fire Department's budget has increased by $2,200,000 due to several contributing factors. The most significant of these factors is an oversight on the part of staff to budget for retiree expenses of approximately $1.3 million. While this retiree expense continues to be a responsibility of the City, it is a cost that is directly associated with the former Victorville fire department. Another major contributing factor is increased personnel costs in the amount of $900,000. Over half of these costs will be offset by State reimbursements for strike team events the Fire department has participated in. Staff anticipates that these reimbursements will be made in the following fiscal year.
•The Parks Department's budget has increased by $109,425 to accommodate two essential needs: the replacement of a malfunctioning water meter and the funding required for vehicle repairs.
•Information Technology is requesting an increase of $140,000 in Contract Services to support essential projects, including enhancements to Munis software 3 9
9 8
workflows, the development of a Munis API for integration with CivicPlus, and the acquisition of additional Munis TCM storage.
•The remaining increase in expenditures is distributed across various other departments that rely on the General Fund.
With the recommended adjustments, the cash flow is projected to be at 57% of the General Fund Reserve, well above the required 17%.
Projected $63,128,830
Required $18,666,690
Overall, the Mid-Year report projects a General Fund year-end budgetary deficit of approximately $7,017,587.03 which will be offset by fund reserves. The original Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget was adopted with a projected deficit of $3,177,609 after taking into account the annual Victorville Municipal Utilities Services (VMUS) loan repayment.
The difference between the original deficit and the projected Mid-Year deficit is attributed to an increase in expenditures for $4,602,455.24, partly due to an estimated $1.8 million in budget amendments previously approved by Council, and an increase of $762,477.60 in unanticipated revenue for the current Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Given that the City has significantly exceeded its General Fund Reserve requirement in recent fiscal years, this unforeseen deficit can be covered by reserve funding, which is specifically designated for such situations.
Measure P Fund (105):
Measure P FY2024-2025
Revised Budget
Request Increase
(Decrease)
Mid-Year Proposed
Budget
Revenue $37,083,408 $ (558,056) $36,525,352
Expenditures $55,765,553 $ 104,290 $55,869,843
•Revenue for Measure P is projected to decrease by $558,056 primarily due to lower-than-expected bed fee revenue from the Wellness Center’s recuperative care program, which has experienced reduced occupancy rates. •Expenditures are projected to increase by $104,289.75. This increase is primarily driven by higher expenses within the Fire Department, and greater-than- anticipated electricity consumption at the Wellness Center.
With the recommended adjustments, the cash flow is projected to be at 51% of the Measure P Fund Reserve, well above the required 17%.
Projected $25,381,145
Required $ 8,490,653
Special Revenue Funds: The following outlines the most significant adjustments to the City’s special revenue funds.
3 9
9 8
•The increase in revenue of $138,799 is mostly attributed to the latest Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) estimates for Gas Tax from January 2025. •Funds 202, 250, and 370 have been allocated to support three projects: the acquisition of a front-end sweeper, the purchase of a Stencil truck for the Traffic Control Division, and the City's beautification program. These combined projects result in a total expenditure increase of $143,000 across these funds. •Fund 205 expenditures have increased by $192,494.31 to support ongoing remediation efforts at the Nuway Site, in compliance with the Lahontan Water Board’s requirements.
•The expenditures for Public Works have increased by $157,000 for electricity cost primarily due to an unanticipated increase in usage of the CNG stations.
Enterprise Funds:
Victorville Water (Funds 410-414,416):
•The Water Fund (Fund 410) has experienced a revenue increase of $1,418,662.32 primarily driven by higher-than-expected revenue from the High Desert Power Plant (HDPP) reimbursements, water permit fees, penalty late fees, plan check fees, and service call fees.
•The Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant (IWWTP) Capacity Charge (Fund 416) and the Water Capacity Charges (Fund 414) have collectively experienced a revenue increase of $417,000, largely attributed to anticipated interest income expected to be received in the remaining quarters of Fiscal Year 2024-2025. •Water Capacity Charges (Fund 414) expenditures have been reduced by $1,312,467. This decrease is due to a pipeline turnout project that will be spanning over more than one fiscal year.
•Water Fund (Fund 410) capital expenditures have decreased by $455,460 due to the cancellation of three projects: the SCADA communication tower, the SCADA Fiber Extension, and the replacement of the roof on modular building D1. •Reclaimed Water Fund (Fund 413) contract services have been reduced by $200,000 due to the removal of the recycled water master plan from this fiscal year's budget.
•Although some reductions have been noted, they are offset by $608,469 increase in the Water Fund (Fund 410) expenditures, primarily allocated to infrastructure repairs, including the Solitude Circle pavement repair and the Mojave/Village repair project.
Solid Waste Management (Funds 425-427):
•The Solid Waste Division has experienced a revenue increase of $881,475 primarily due to an increase in late fees, special service fees and interest income. •Expenditures for the Sanitary Division are projected to increase by $251,007.80 primarily due to a higher-than-anticipated volume of sewer lateral repairs, driven by increased infrastructure demands.
3 9
9 8
Southern California Logistics Airport (Funds 450-457):
•Airport Operations (Fund 450) has experienced a revenue decrease of $200,000 primarily due to the delayed occupancy of building 686; tenancy is now expected between April and June 2025.
•While revenues are being adjusted downward in the amount of $108,960.28, this has been partially offset by a revenue increase of $61,372.24. This positive variance is the result of new leases signed for buildings 553, 728, and 15B after the adoption of the annual budget.
•Total expenditures have decreased by $60,666.52, primarily due to the elimination of the Airport Leasing Technician position.
Conclusion
While the General Fund is currently experiencing a deficit, the City's overall financial position remains strong. The Enterprise Funds are exceeding expectations with an increase in revenue over expenditures in the amount of $2,634,842.74. This positive performance significantly contributes to the City's overall financial stability.
Although it is necessary to utilize fund reserves to address the General Fund deficit, ongoing monitoring and potential adjustments throughout the remainder of the fiscal year will be essential to ensure long-term financial sustainability. Additionally, the City continues to actively seek new revenue sources to support the community, maintain fiscal stability, and secure resources for future needs.
Staff remain available for any questions the Council may have.
Attachments: A. Mid-Year Budget Summary
B. Resolution No. 25-013
C. Resolution No. VWD-25-003
D. Resolution No. SCLAA-25-003
E. Resolution No. CHAS 25-001
F. Resolution No. LBT 25-001
ATTACHMENT A
Mid-Year Budget Summary
Departments/Division
FY 2024-2025
Revised Budget
Requested Increase
(Decrease)
Mid-Year Proposed
Budget
General Fund (100)
Animal Control 70,000.00$ 16,620.87$ 86,620.87$ Building 2,398,500.00$ (258,500.00)$ 2,140,000.00$ Business License 713,500.00$ 85,000.00$ 798,500.00$ City Clerk 350.00$ -$ 350.00$ City Manager -$ 9,575.00$ 9,575.00$ Code Compliance 760,000.00$ -$ 760,000.00$ Economic Development 8,000.00$ -$ 8,000.00$ Engineering 943,500.00$ 697,000.00$ 1,640,500.00$ Facilities 91,112.00$ 6,000.00$ 97,112.00$ Finance 132,015.00$ -$ 132,015.00$ Fire 30,000.00$ -$ 30,000.00$ General Fund 89,797,669.00$ -$ 89,797,669.00$ Information Technology 200,000.00$ -$ 200,000.00$ Library 60,370.00$ -$ 60,370.00$ Parks 240,582.00$ -$ 240,582.00$ Planning 218,000.00$ 68,230.73$ 286,230.73$ Police 3,194,327.00$ 90,000.00$ 3,284,327.00$ Public Works 35,300.00$ -$ 35,300.00$ Recreation 823,193.00$ 7,028.00$ 830,221.00$ Risk Management 843,100.00$ -$ 843,100.00$ Solid Waste 506,000.00$ -$ 506,000.00$ General Fund Total 101,065,518.00$ 720,954.60$ 101,786,472.60$ Measure P Fund (105)
Building 1,044,100.00$ 71,300.00$ 1,115,400.00$ Facilities 118,800.00$ -$ 118,800.00$ Fire -$ -$ -$ Measure P 30,229,000.00$ -$ 30,229,000.00$ Planning 1,674,356.00$ (629,356.00)$ 1,045,000.00$ Police 4,017,152.00$ -$ 4,017,152.00$ Measure P Fund Total 37,083,408.00$ (558,056.00)$ 36,525,352.00$ Fiscal Year 2024 -2025 Mid-Year Budget Revision: Changes to Budgeted Revenues Departments/Division
FY 2024-2025
Revised Budget
Requested Increase
(Decrease)
Mid-Year Proposed
Budget
Fiscal Year 2024 -2025 Mid-Year Budget Revision: Changes to Budgeted Revenues Building 650,000.00$ -$ 650,000.00$ Economic Development 5,826,774.00$ -$ 5,826,774.00$ Engineering 19,310,991.00$ 13,000.00$ 19,323,991.00$ Finance 469,482.00$ -$ 469,482.00$ Fire 160,000.00$ -$ 160,000.00$ Information Technology 250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ Library -$ -$ -$ Parks 2,380,000.00$ -$ 2,380,000.00$ Police 106,650.00$ -$ 106,650.00$ Public Works 9,706,888.00$ 125,799.00$ 9,832,687.00$ Other Governmental Funds Total 38,860,785.00$ 138,799.00$ 38,999,584.00$ Enterprise Funds (410-414,416,419,420-423,425-428,450,452,455,457) Airport 28,538,931.00$ (108,960.28)$ 28,429,970.72$ Finance 11,092,647.00$ -$ 11,092,647.00$ Public Works 28,661,911.00$ 221,000.00$ 28,882,911.00$ Solid Waste 30,356,151.00$ 660,475.00$ 31,016,626.00$ VMUS 29,183,001.00$ -$ 29,183,001.00$ Water 56,811,710.00$ 1,898,894.32$ 58,710,604.32$ Enterprise Funds Total 184,644,351.00$ 2,671,409.04$ 187,315,760.04$ Citywide Revenue Total 361,654,062.00$ 2,973,106.64$ 364,627,168.64$ Other Governmental Funds
(111, 120,200,201,202,205,220,221,230,233,240,241,242,250,277,303,350-360,370,611,612,660) Departments/Division
FY 2024-2025
Revised Budget
Requested Increase
(Decrease)
Mid-Year Proposed
Budget
General Fund (100)
Animal Control 470,849.00$ 14,713.68$ 485,562.68$ Building 2,062,733.00$ 3,713.68$ 2,066,446.68$ Business License 484,033.00$ 10,713.68$ 494,746.68$ Capital 3,981,779.00$ -$ 3,981,779.00$ City Clerk 1,185,290.00$ 73,642.18$ 1,258,932.18$ City Manager 1,872,295.00$ (57,132.55)$ 1,815,162.45$ Code Compliance 986,380.00$ (100,286.32)$ 886,093.68$ Economic Development -$ -$ -$ Engineering 353,133.00$ 69,713.68$ 422,846.68$ Facilities 2,608,438.00$ 76,170.44$ 2,684,608.44$ Finance 4,890,992.00$ (4,000.00)$ 4,886,992.00$ Fire 16,675,359.00$ 2,229,831.65$ 18,905,190.65$ General Fund 550,000.00$ -$ 550,000.00$ Human Resources 2,911,814.00$ 44,155.41$ 2,955,969.41$ Information Technology 8,278,022.00$ 155,321.06$ 8,433,343.06$ Library 1,508,589.00$ 22,873.10$ 1,531,462.10$ Parks 5,615,106.00$ 132,616.10$ 5,747,722.10$ Planning 2,167,038.00$ 156,174.59$ 2,323,212.59$ Police 38,377,311.00$ -$ 38,377,311.00$ Public Information Office 633,810.00$ -$ 633,810.00$ Public Works 3,097,560.00$ 26,040.00$ 3,123,600.00$ Recreation 2,677,533.00$ 13,597.44$ 2,691,130.44$ Risk Management 4,693,827.00$ (72,267.19)$ 4,621,559.81$ Solid Waste 927,578.00$ (1,000.00)$ 926,578.00$ General Fund Total 107,009,469.00$ 2,794,590.63$ 109,804,059.63$ Measure P Fund (105)
Animal Control 4,597,950.00$ -$ 4,597,950.00$ Building 964,013.00$ (46,700.00)$ 917,313.00$ Capital 27,103,760.00$ 33,600.00$ 27,137,360.00$ City Manager 449,767.00$ (6,423.93)$ 443,343.07$ Code Compliance 1,965,186.00$ -$ 1,965,186.00$ Facilities 1,130,525.00$ 54,456.56$ 1,184,981.56$ Fire 5,415,273.00$ 21,470.00$ 5,436,743.00$ Information Technology 74,000.00$ 28,000.00$ 102,000.00$ Library 1,016,427.00$ -$ 1,016,427.00$ Measure P 7,814,605.00$ -$ 7,814,605.00$ Parks 393,094.00$ 19,887.12$ 412,981.12$ Planning 1,903,964.00$ -$ 1,903,964.00$ Police 2,642,634.00$ -$ 2,642,634.00$ Solid Waste 294,355.00$ -$ 294,355.00$ Measure P Fund Total 55,765,553.00$ 104,289.75$ 55,869,842.75$ Fiscal Year 2024 -2025 Mid-Year Budget Revision: Changes to Budgeted Expenditures Departments/Division
FY 2024-2025
Revised Budget
Requested Increase
(Decrease)
Mid-Year Proposed
Budget
Fiscal Year 2024 -2025 Mid-Year Budget Revision: Changes to Budgeted Expenditures Building 320,554.00$ -$ 320,554.00$ Capital 22,829,941.00$ 143,000.00$ 22,972,941.00$ Economic Development 4,492,736.00$ 70,317.55$ 4,563,053.55$ Engineering 7,722,103.00$ (87,287.33)$ 7,634,815.67$ Finance 470,139.00$ -$ 470,139.00$ Information Technology 308,412.00$ -$ 308,412.00$ Parks 118,288.00$ -$ 118,288.00$ Police 9,709.00$ -$ 9,709.00$ Public Works 10,412,907.00$ 168,397.97$ 10,581,304.97$ Other Governmental Funds Total 46,684,789.00$ 294,428.19$ 46,979,217.19$ Enterprise Funds (410-414,416,419,420-423,425-428,450,452,455,457) Airport 23,939,766.00$ (61,403.21)$ 23,878,362.79$ Capital 81,745,096.00$ (1,736,427.00)$ 80,008,669.00$ Economic Development 273,745.00$ 2,946.84$ 276,691.84$ Engineering 3,888,395.00$ (61,551.85)$ 3,826,843.15$ Finance 14,757,524.00$ 370,000.00$ 15,127,524.00$ Public Works 19,483,822.00$ 242,881.65$ 19,726,703.65$ Solid Waste 28,373,451.00$ (20,322.00)$ 28,353,129.00$ VMUS 24,575,113.00$ (9,878.74)$ 24,565,234.26$ Water 49,555,848.00$ 1,310,320.61$ 50,866,168.61$ Enterprise Funds Total 246,592,760.00$ 36,566.30$ 246,629,326.30$ Citywide Expenditure Total 456,052,571.00$ 3,229,874.87$ 459,282,445.87$ TOTAL REVENUES 361,654,062.00$ 2,973,106.64$ 364,627,168.64$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 456,052,571.00$ 3,229,874.87$ 459,282,445.87$ Other Governmental Funds
(111, 120,200,201,202,205,220,221,230,233,240,241,242,250,277,303,350-360,370,611,612,660)
ATTACHMENT B
Resolution No. 25-013
RESOLUTION NO. 25-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VICTORVILLE AMENDING RESOLUTION 24 -037, AS AMENDED,
THE BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 -2025, RELATING TO AN
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Victorville has heretofore submitted to the City Council at mid-year additional estimates of expenditures and revenues of the City departments and offices for the fiscal year 2024-2025; and WHEREAS, copies of said mid-year budget adjustments at the City of Victorville were prepared and distributed to the City Council, and have been available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Victorville; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed February 18, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, California, as the time and place for holding a Public Hearing on the proposed budget amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council held the Public Hearing at the specified time and place, and all persons desiring to be heard regarding the budget amendment were heard. After due considerations, the City Council has determined that the budget amendment should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the increased estimates for expenditures for the City at mid-year for the fiscal year 2024-2025, now on file with the City Clerk, are hereby adopted in the amount of $3,346,555.67; and the additional estimates for revenues for the City are $1,183,172.60.
SECTION 2. Those copies of such annual budget amendments, certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and certified copies thereof shall be made available for use by City departments and offices of the City and its subsidiary districts.
ATTACHMENT C
Resolution No. VWD-25-003
RESOLUTION NO. VWD-25-003
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT AMENDING RESOLUTION VWD -
24-006, AS AMENDED, THE BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR THE
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 -2025,
RELATING TO AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.
WHEREAS, the General Manager of the Victorville Water District has heretofore submitted to the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District at mid -year additional estimates of expenditures and revenues of the Victorville Water District for the fiscal year 2024-2025; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District fixed February 18, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, California, as the time and place for holding a Public Hearing on the proposed budget amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District held the Public Hearing at the specified time and place, and all persons desiring to be heard regarding the budget amendment were heard. After due considerations, the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District has determined that the budget amendment should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the decreased estimates for expenditures for the Victorville Water District at mid-year for the fiscal year 2024-2025, now on file with the City Clerk, are hereby adopted in the amount of $144,632.91; and that the additional estimates for revenues for the Victorville Water District are $1,898,894.32.
SECTION 2. Those copies of such annual budget amendments , certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and certified copies thereof shall be made available for use by the Victorville Water District, City departments, and the offices of the City.
ATTACHMENT D
Resolution No.
SCLAA-25-003
RESOLUTION NO. SCLAA-25-003
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
AMENDING RESOLUTION SCLAA -24-003, AS AMENDED, THE
BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 -2025, RELATING TO AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.
WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority has heretofore submitted to the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority at mid-year additional estimates of expenditures and revenues of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority for the fiscal year 2024-2025; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority fixed February 18, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, California, as the time and place for holding a Public Hearing on the proposed budget amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority held the Public Hearing at the specified time and place, and all persons desiring to be heard regarding the budget amendment were heard. After due considerations, the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority has determined that the budget amendment should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AIRPORT AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the decreased estimates for expenditures for the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority at mid -year for the fiscal year 2024-2025, now on file with the City Clerk, are hereby adopted in the amount of $60,666.52; and that the decreased estimates for revenues for the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority are $108,960.28.
SECTION 2. Those copies of such annual budget amendments, certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and certified copies thereof shall be made available for use by the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority, City departments, and the offices of the City.
ATTACHMENT E
Resolution No.
CHAS 25-001
RESOLUTION NO. CHAS 25-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VICTORVILLE AS THE HOUSING ASSET SUCCESSOR TO THE
VICTORVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDING
RESOLUTION CHAS 24 -003, AS AMENDED, THE BUDGET
RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY AS THE HOUSING ASSET
SUCCESSOR FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 -2025, RELATING TO AN
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Victorville has heretofore submitted to the City Council as the Housing Asset Successor to the Victorville Redevelopment Agency at mid-year additional estimates of expenditures and revenues of the Housing Asset Successor to the Victorville Redevelopment Agency for the fiscal year 2024-2025; and
WHEREAS, the copies of said mid -year budget adjustments at the City of Victorville as the Housing Asset Successor to the Victorville Redevelopment Agency were prepared and distributed to the City Council, and have been available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Victorville; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed February 18, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, California, as the time and place for holding a Public Hearing on the proposed budget amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council held the Public Hearing at the specified time and place, and all persons desiring to be heard regarding the budget amendment were heard.
After due considerations, the City Council as the Housing Asset Successor to the Victorville Redevelopment Agency has determined that the budget amendment should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE AS THE
HOUSING ASSET SUCESSOR TO THE VICTORVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the increased estimates for expenditures for the City as the Housing Asset Successor to the Victorville Redevelopment Agency at mid -year for the fiscal year 2024-2025, now on the file with the City Clerk, are hereby adopted in the amount of $65,745.53.
SECTION 2. Those copies of such annual budget amendments, certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and certified copies thereof shall be made available for use by City departments and offices of the City and its subsidiary districts.
ATTACHMENT F
Resolution No. LBT 25-001
RESOLUTION NO. LBT 25-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
AMENDING RESOLUTION LBT 24 -002, AS AMENDED, THE
BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR THE VICTORVILLE LIBRARY FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025, RELATING TO AN APPROPRIATION OF
FUNDS.
WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Library has heretofore submitted to the Library Board of Trustees a t mid -year additional estimates of the expenditures and revenues of the library for the fiscal year 2024-2025; and WHEREAS, copies of said mid -year budget adjustments at the City of Victorville were prepared and distributed to the Library Board of Trustees, and have been available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Victorville; and WHEREAS, the Library Board of Trustees fixed February 18, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, California, as the time and place for holding a Public Hearing on the proposed budget amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Library Board of Trustees held the Public Hearing at the specified time and place, and all persons desiring to be heard regarding the budget amendment were heard. After due considerations, the Library Board of Trustees has determined that the budget amendment should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the increased estimates for expenditures for the library at mid- year for the fiscal year 2024-2025, now on file with the City Clerk, are hereby adopted in the amount of $22,873.10.
SECTION 2. Those copies of such annual budget amendments , certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and certified copies thereof shall be made available for use by City departments and offices of the City and its subsidiary districts.
Item Number: 4
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 17516
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the full release of the Sewer Improvement Labor and Materials Security for Tract Map No. 17516.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with “Goal E Invest in Infrastructure” in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 17516 (Tract 17516) is a 39-lot, single family subdivision, located at the northwest corner of Verano Street and Cataba Road. On July 6, 2021, the City Council approved a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) secured by improvement bonds with Victorville 105 Lots, LP, a California limited partnership also known as Legacy Homes, for tract development. The conditions of approval for the tract required that the developer finalize various infrastructure components; those components being Water, Drainage, Sewer, Street and Monumentation Improvements. The developer has made significant progress in the development of the tract, and at the regular City Council meeting held on June 6, 2023, the City Council approved and accepted the completed sewer improvements.
3 9
5 7
Discussion:
Per Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.070(3), Labor and Materials Securities are held for a 6-month period. Therefore, staff recommends the full release of the Sewer Public Improvement Labor and Materials Security due to the acceptance taking place at the June 6, 2023, regular City Council meeting.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table
C. Existing Securities
Attachment B
Securities Table
Securities Table
Water, Sewer, Drainage, Street & Monumentation Bond Totals:
Faithful Performance Security
Water Improvements – No. 0788891 Labor & Materials Security Water Improvements – No. 0788891
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $248,719.90 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $124,359.95 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Sewer Improvements – No. 0788891 Labor & Materials Security Sewer Improvements – No. 0788891
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $259,996.00 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $129,998.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $51,999.20 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $129,998.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $129,998.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $51,999.20 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Drainage Improvements – No. 0788891 Labor & Materials Security Drainage Improvements – No. 0788891
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $3,300.00 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,650.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Street Improvements – No. 0788891 Labor & Materials Security Street Improvements – No. 0788891
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $868,997.53 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $434,498.77 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $347,599.01 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $434,498.77 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $347,599.01 Amount of Security REMAINING: $434,498.77 Securities Table
Water, Sewer, Drainage, Street & Monumentation Bond Totals:
Developer:
Victorville 115 Lots, LP
3202 W. March Lane Suite A
Stockton, CA 95219
Faithful Performance Security
Monumentation Improvements – No. 0788891
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $31,625.00
Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $31,625.00
Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00
Amount of Security REMAINING: $31,625.00
Item Number: 5
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 13816
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the full release of the Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) Labor and Materials Security for Tract Map No. 13816.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with “Goal E Invest in Infrastructure” in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 13816 (Tract 13816) is a 195-lot, single family subdivision, located at the northwest corner of Mojave Drive and Cobalt Road. The conditions of approval for the tract required the developer to complete various infrastructure components, including Water, Sewer, Street, Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) and Monumentation Improvements. On April 20, 2021, the City Council approved a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) secured by improvement securities with D.R.
Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc., also known as D.R. Horton, for the development of the tract. Since then, D.R. Horton has made significant progress in the development of Tract 13816. At the regular City Council meeting held on August 20, 2024, the City Council approved and accepted the completed Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) Improvements.
3 9
5 5
Discussion:
Per Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.070(3), Labor and Materials Securities are held for a 6-month period. Therefore, staff recommends the full release of the Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) Labor and Materials Security due to the acceptance taking place at the August 20, 2024, regular City Council meeting.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table
C. Existing Securities
Attachment B
Securities Table
Securities Table
Faithful Performance Security
Water Improvements – No. SUR0067960 Labor & Materials Security Water Improvements – No. SUR0067960
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $786,317.40 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $393,158.70 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00
Faithful Performance Security
Sewer Improvements – No. SUR0067960 Labor & Materials Security Sewer Improvements – No. SUR0067960
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $439,147.50 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $219,573.75 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
LMAD Improvements – No. SUR0067960 Labor & Materials Security LMAD Improvements – No. SUR0067960
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $173,537.10 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $86,768.55 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $34,707.42 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $86,768.55 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $86,768.55 Amount of Security REMAINING: $34,707.42 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Street Improvements – No. SUR0067960 Labor & Materials Security Street Improvements – No. SUR0067960
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $3,460,157.76 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,730,078.88 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $1,384,063.10 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $1,730,078.88 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $1,384,063.10 Amount of Security REMAINING: $1,730,078.88 Securities Table
Developer:
D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc.
980 Montecito Drive Suite 300
Corona, Ca 92879
Faithful Performance Security
Monumentation Improvements – No.
SUR0067960
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $95,452.80
Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $95,452.80
Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00
Amount of Security REMAINING: $95,452.80
Item Number: 6
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 15295
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the full release of the Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) Labor and Materials Security for Tract Map No. 15295.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with “Goal E Invest in Infrastructure” in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 15295 (referred to as Tract 15295) is an 82-lot single-family subdivision located west of Highway 395 and north of Eucalyptus Street. In 2006, Savannah Collection – Victorville, LLC (Savannah Collection), the original subdivider for Tract 15295, recorded the map after entering into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) and posting securities for the required public improvements. While Savannah Homes completed most of the public improvements, construction was halted due to an economic downturn that affected the residential market. As a result, no homes were built, and the lots remained vacant. In April 2021, D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc., a California corporation (D.R. Horton), acquired the property and began development of Tract 15295. The conditions of approval for the tract required that the developer finalize various infrastructure components; those components being water, sewer, drainage, street, landscaping maintenance assessment district (LMAD) and monumentation improvements.
3 9
5 4
The developer has made significant progress in the development of the tract, and at the regular City Council meeting held on August 20, 2024, the City Council approved and accepted the completed Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) Public Improvements.
Discussion:
Per Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.070(3), Labor and Materials Securities are held for a 6-month period. Therefore, staff recommends the full release of the Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) Public Improvement Labor and Materials Security due to the acceptance taking place at the August 20, 2024, regular City Council meeting.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table
C. Existing Securities
Attachment B
Securities Table
Securities Table
Water, Sewer, Drainage, Street, LMAD & Monumentation Bond Totals:
Faithful Performance Security
Water Improvements – No. SUR0067931 Labor & Materials Security Water Improvements – No. SUR0067931
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $255,152.70 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $127,576.35 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Sewer Improvements – No. SUR0067931 Labor & Materials Security Sewer Improvements – No. SUR0067931
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $71,824.50 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $35,912.25 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Drainage Improvements – No. SUR0067931 Labor & Materials Security Drainage Improvements – No. SUR0067931
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $3,619.55 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,809.78 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $3,619.55 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $1,809.78 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $3,619.55 Amount of Security REMAINING: $1,809.78 Faithful Performance Security
Street Improvements – No. SUR0067931 Labor & Materials Security Street Improvements – No. SUR0067931
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,504,188.84 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $752,094.42 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $601,675.54 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $752,094.42 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $601,675.54 Amount of Security REMAINING: $752,094.42 Securities Table
Water, Sewer, Drainage, Street, LMAD & Monumentation Bond Totals:
Developer:
D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc.
980 Montecito Drive Suite 300
Corona, Ca 92879
Faithful Performance Security
LMAD – No. SUR0067931 Labor & Materials Security
LMAD – No. SUR0067931
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $563,051.94 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $281,525.97 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $112,610.39 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $281,525.97 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $281,525.97 Amount of Security REMAINING: $112,610.39 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00
Faithful Performance Security
Monumentation Improvements – No. SUR0067931
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $5,368.00
Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $5,368.00
Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00
Amount of Security REMAINING: $5,368.00
Item Number: 7
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 16774
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the full release of the Street Improvement Labor and Materials Security for Tract Map No. 16774.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with “Goal E Invest in Infrastructure” in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 16774 (Tract 16774) is a 150-lot single-family housing subdivision located at the northwest corner of La Mesa Road and Peña Road. FHII, LLC, also known as Frontier Homes, (Developer) entered into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with the City on March 16, 2021. The conditions of approval for the tract required that the developer finalize various infrastructure components; those components being Water, Drainage, Sewer, Street, Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts (LMAD) and Monumentation. The developer has made significant progress in the development of the tract, and at the regular City Council meeting held on August 20, 2024, the City Council approved and accepted the completed street improvements.
Discussion:
Per Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.070(3), Labor and Materials Securities are held for a 6-month period. Therefore, staff recommends the full release of the Street 3 9
7 2
Public Improvement Labor and Materials Security due to the acceptance taking place at the August 20, 2024, regular City Council meeting.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table
C. Existing Securities
Attachment A
Vicinity Map
Attachment B Securities Table
Attachment C
Existing Securities
Item Number: 8
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 15896-1
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the full release of Labor and Materials Securities for Water, Drainage, Sewer, and Street Improvements for Tract Map No. 15896-1.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with “Goal E Invest in Infrastructure” in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 15896-1 (Tract 15896-1) is a 37-lot single-family subdivision located at the northwest corner of Nisqualli Road and 9th Avenue. KB Homes Coastal, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as KB Homes) acquired Tract 15896-1 from Javid Investments, LLC; Royal Investors Group, LLC; and Shayan Capital, LLC on January 16, 2020. The conditions of approval for the tract required that the developer finalize various infrastructure components; those components being water, drainage, sewer, Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts (LMAD), and street improvements. The developer has made significant progress in the development of the tract, and at the regular City Council meeting held on August 20, 2024, the City Council approved and accepted the completed water, drainage, sewer, and street improvements.
3 9
7 4
Discussion:
Per Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.070(3), the Labor and Materials Securities are held for a 6-month period. Therefore, staff recommends the full release of the Labor and Materials Securities for Water, Drainage, Sewer, and Street Improvements due to the acceptance taking place at the August 20, 2024, regular City Council meeting.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table
C. Existing Securities
Attachment B
Securities Table
Securities Table
Developer:
KB Home Coastal, Inc.
36310 Inland Valley Drive
Wildomar, CA 92595
Faithful Performance Security
Public Improvements – No. 0232147 Labor & Materials Security Public Improvements – No. 0232147
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $481,127.00 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $257,186.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $96,225.40 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $257,186.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $257,186.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $96,225.40 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00
Item Number: 9
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Security Substitution for Tract Map No. 17292-1
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve the execution of a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., for Tract Map No. 17292-1; (2) Accept new securities (bonds) for the required public improvements for Tract Map No. 17292-1;
(3) Approve the execution of a Release of the existing Subdivision Agreement with Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC., for Tract Map No. 17292-1; (4) Approve the execution of a Release of the existing Land Division Improvement Construction Agreement with Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC., for Tract Map No. 17292-1; and
(5) Approve the execution of a Release of the existing Utility Surety Agreement with Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC., for Tract Map No. 17292-1.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with “Goal E Invest in Infrastructure” in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 17292-1 (hereinafter called Tract 17292-1) is a residential subdivision of 122 single-family lots, located at the southeast corner of Mesa View Drive and Olivine Road, please see Attachment A, Vicinity Map. In 2007, Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC., a 3 9
7 5
California Limited Liability Company, as the property owner recorded the map after providing a subdivision improvement agreement secured by a lien agreement as security for the required public improvements, and utility surety agreements for the tract. Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC., constructed some of the public improvements, but no homes were constructed within the tract, as construction stopped when the Great Recession affected the residential market. Now, Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., is the current owner of all the undeveloped lots in Tract 17292-1.
Discussion:
As a result of this purchase, Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., is required to enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) and to provide substitute securities in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code §17.64.060. Upon receipt of the new securities, the existing subdivision improvement agreement, lien agreement, land division improvement construction agreement, and utility surety agreement can be released. The new SIA and securities are mandatory for the required public improvements which include the following:
•Water
•Sewer
•Landscaping and irrigation (LMAD) improvements along Mesa View Drive and Olivine Road
•Street improvements for the tract interior and the perimeter roads of Mesa View Drive and Olivine Road
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. New Subdivision Improvement Agreement
C. New Securities
D. Existing Subdivision Agreement
E. Release of Subdivision Agreement
F. Existing Land Division Improvement Construction Agreement G. Satisfaction and Release of Land Division Construction Improvement Agreement
H. Existing Utility Surety Agreement
I. Satisfaction and Release of Utility Surety Agreement
Attachment B
New Subdivision
Improvement Agreement
ꢖEEꢗ 1. ꢘ 12 ꢙEEꢗꢚIN ꢀr ꢁTY Of ꢂCꢃꢄRꢅLLE, ꢆꢇꢈꢉꢊ ꢋ SAꣁ BꢌRNꢍDꢎꢏꢐꢑ Sꢒꢓꢔ ꢕ CꢓLꥄF꣄RꣅIꢓ TRACT MAP NO. 17292-1
BEꨊNG ꢓ ꢛUꢜꢝMꢞꢟN ꢟF ꣖ Pꢠꢡꢢꢣ F ꢤꢥꢦꢧꢨ 1 ꣄ꨰ Pꢩꢪꢫꢬ ꢭꢥ ꣅꪥMꢜfꢦ 174J4괥 곏꣔ Eꢦ ꢭꢮ ꢦꢯꢰ ꢢN ꢜꢱ 2꩔Jꢑ ꢲꢳꢴꢵ 28 ꢓꣁ굴 29• ꢄF PꢓRCꢼL Mꢓꢲꤨ ꢢꣁ ꢶꢷ ꢸꢧ ꦟF ꢹꢺ CꢟUꢏ꤃ꤘ ꢻꢼꢽꢝEꢦ ꢾ ꢿꣀ BꢼRꣁꢓRꣂꣃ꣄ CꢇꣅY ' Iꣁ ꢿECꢉꢎOꣁ 33ꢑ Tꢢ 5 Hꢑ ꢦꢳꣁ꣎ � �꤃ꢑ ꤆AN ꣏꣐ꣁꢥ꣑꣒ꣁ꣓ MꢼꢢDꢢꢳꣁ꯫ HUꣁ꣔AKꢌꢦ ꢥND ꢳ꣔ꢛO꣕꣖꣗ꢛꢑ ꢢNC ꣘P꣙ꢜꢼꢻ
꣠ ꣡꣢꣣꣤꣥꣦ ꬴ가ꬴ 각ꮔ갂ꮔ갃
꣧ ꣨꣩l꣪꣫( ꣬꣭꣮꣯꣩ ꣰꣱ꢃ ꣲ ꢳꩆ꣩ ꣱꯴괪 ꣳ ꩑ꫴ꣩ ꧠꢳ곒ꢡIꤣꤋ ꣴꢳꣵꣶ ꣷ꣸ ꣹꣺ꣻ ꣼ꣽꣾ ꣿ꤀꤁꤂꤃ 1ꤠ ꤄꤅ ꨚ 간갅ꤘ ꤆꤃ꢥ갆 ꣰ꢳꢃ ꢢ 갇 갈갉 갊갋 갌갍 갎 갏 ꢛ꣭ꢥ 감 ꯏ갑값갓갔강ꢳ ꢳꢏꤼ 갖갗ꢳꢃ ꫡꤜꥄꤨI.Mꤑ ꤆U꤇꤈꤉ꤊ � ꤋ꣨ꤌꤍ ꤎ THꤣ ꤏꢏꤐꤑ ꪚRꢳꨓꦑ 굦ꢳP MCꤑ ꤕꥍ꣱꤃ ꤒ ꢳꤓꤔ ꤕꤖ ꤗꤘ ꤙꤚ ꮬꩆꢥꭀꢃ ꧴ꢳ굳 갘같갚 갛 ꩔2 개 ꢢꤨ ꢳ lꤓꬽ꣩ ꢳꢏ 객갞갟갠ꢤ갡ꢃ갢 갣갤갥ꢳꤶ갦 갧 ꢳ 갨갩ꤛꤜꤌꤝ ꣺ꤞꤟꢃ ꨚꤨ ꤠꤡꤢꤣꤤꤥ ꢃꭻ ꢲ� ꤦꤧ£ ꢃꥉ ꤨꢳꤩ ꤪ꤫꤬ꢑ ꤭꤮ ꤯ ꤰꤱꤠꤲ ꢃꭥ ꥌꥍ꣩ 갪V꣩ꤘ ꧴갫갬 Bꤘ M꣩ ꨉ ꭗꢏꤑꪁꪊ Mꧣ 갭갮갯갰 갱 갲ꬱ갳갴갵갶꣩갷ꪣ 갸갹꩙ ꨚꢏ 갺갻갼갽갾 갿걀 ꥍ 걁
ꢤꤓꤳꤴꢳꤵꢳꤶꤷ ꤭ꣁD ꤸꤹꢳꤺꤻꤼꤽ ꤾ ꢵꤿꥀ l걻A꣺꤃ ꨞꢳꢲ ꥁ ꥂ꤇ꥃꥄꥅꥆꥇ "5 ꥈꥉꥊ ꥋꥌꥍꥄꥎ ꥏꥐ꣩ ꣩걂강ꩆ걃걄꫱ 걅 걆 걇걈걉ꤞ ꢳꢤ ꢳ꩝ꢃ ꯔ ꨋ걊걋 걌걍H걎걏ꣁ걐 ꢥꢃ 걑ꢼ 걒 걓 ꢦ걔걕꣭ꢳ꣺ꢃ ꥑꥒ ꤇꥓꣱ ꥟ ꤑꤳꢳ ꦑO ꤘ ꥉ꯸ ꢃꤪ ꢲ ꤱ ꢳ N 1 ꤺAꨋ괪 ꥏHꢼ ꤨ꤃ꤨ ꤨ꧀ꤼMI ꤞ·ꤨꤑ ꥄꤑ 걖걗걘걙ꤨ걚걛걜ꢑ � � ���}Ui��ꤌt걝걞 H���� 31ꩨ 갸걟ꪣ Iꢏ 걠걡걢 걣ꤕꥍ 걤ꨓ걥ꤨ ꮄꮄ495 ꢳꤠꪱ 걦걧걨ꮅb ꩜ 걩 ꣬ꭗ걪걫걬 걭 ꢳꨆꢃ 걮 ꣩ꢑ ꨖ 걯거 궐ꢼꢑ 걱걲걳ꢏꢃ ꤃굴 건걵꣩ lꥍ꣩ 걱걶걷 걸 걹 걺꧙걻ꢳ걼ꤑ걽 ꢢ 걾ꤓ걿ꨐ ꫱Tꢳꧢꤡ 검ꨭ겁ꢃ 굛ꦸꢢꤨ 겂것ꥎꧪ겄 ꨞꩃꬱ
ꤓꦀꤵꦁꦂꢼꢑ ꦃ ꦄꦅꦆ꤇ꦇ ꦈꦉꢃ Lꤼꢃ꫱ ꦊꦋ: •a,• ꢳꢏD •ꢀ ꢃꤼ ꦌ꣩ ꦍ ꦎ ꦏꦐꦑꤼꦒWꦓꦔ£ Iꢏ ꦕ 겅ꢃ꤭ꣁ겆ꨚ겇ꤘ ꣺Mꤼ� ꣯ꤌ 겈 겉겊겋꤭게ꤘ 겍겎 겏ꢃꢳꤕ겐 겑ꢳ꩝ꢃ 겒겓겔ꦖꦗꢑ ꦘ lHE ꦙ꣺ꦚiꦛꦜꢑ ꥄꢏꦝ꤃ꦞꢳꤺꢎꦟꥎꢑ ꦠꦡ ꦢꢥꥄꣁꦣꣁꦤ ꦥ ꦦꦧꥎꦨꦩ ꦪꦫꢳꦬ ꣬ꦭꦮ꣬ꢑ ꦯꦰL꣬ �ꥃ ꦱꦔꦲ꦳ ꦴꦵ ꤌꩳ ꤨ꤭O ꨞꢳꤴ ꦶꦷꦸꢎꤠ ꫱ꢳꥄ ꦹꦺVꦻꦼꦽꦾ ꤑꢳ겕 2ꢀ(ꢁ 겖 . 겗겘겙��겚겛겜겝ꦿ ꧀꣩꧁ ꧂꧃\꧄ ꢃ갭 ꧅꧆꧇꣬ꢑ ꤼꩵꯀ ꧈ꤨ ꢳ꧉ ꤭꧊ꥄ꧋ꤋ ꢳNꤑ ꧌ ꧍ ꧏ꧐ ꧑ ꧒꧓꧔꧕ ꧖ ꢡꭲꤣ ꧗ꤣꤝ꧘꧙ �꣩ ꤨ ꧞꧟ ꪚHr ꢲ꫱Tꩆ꣩ꢳ ꧠꧡꧢꧣ ꧤꦫ ꯛ ꥌꥍ꣩ ꣬ꧥꥏꥍ ꧦ 12 ꢂ�·
ꩠꤌꤼꢃ ꧧ ꧠꤓꥄVꢳꪚ[ ꧨꧩꥎꧪꧫ ꣩꣱ꧬꦁꧭꧮ ꧯ꧰ 괪ꤌꦑ 27 ꢳꤨ ꧱ ꧲ ꤨ꧳ ꧴꧵ ꧶꧷꧸꧘ ꤨMO 겞겟겠겡겢겣겤 겥겦
겧겨격겪겫견
겭겮겯결겱
꣬꧹꤇ꤑꧺꧻꧼ
ꧽꧾK ꢲꢳꨀꨁ-ꨂꨃꨄꢑ ꨅ꣺ꢑ ꢳ ꨆꢥꨇꨈꨉ꧘ꨊꢳ ꨋꨌ꧙꣩ ꨍꨎTꤘ ꨏꢤꢥꢏꨐꨑ
꤇ꤘ: ꪚPꤜꮴ ꨒꨓꦩ ꢳ ꨆꨔꨕꨖꢏꥄꢳ ꦔꨗꨘꤑ ꨙꨚ꤭ꨛꢢꨜꤘ ꨝꢳꤠꤘ ꨚꢃ꫱ ꨞꨟꨠꨡꨢꢳꥎ꣱ꨣ
꤇ꤘ: ꨤꨥꨦꨧꤿꨨ ꨩꥏꨪ꣩ꤨꨫ ꢢꤠ꣺ꦾ굍 ꢳ ꨬꨭꨮꨯꨰꨱꨚꢳ ꨲꨳꨴꨵꢳꨶ ns ꤇
Sꤘ, / � ꢀ=ꢲꩀꩁꢃ
ꥄ꧉ꩂꩃꨬ ꤇ꩃꢏꭰꢑ f.꣬걽꤇굍 ꤇꣩ꥎꩄꩅ꣺ꥄꩃꩆ ꩇꢏꤑꦅ ꢳ ꤑꤳ곦ꤑ ꩈ ꪚRꫤ꫱ꢡ ꤓꩉꩊ ꤭ꩋꩌ 27ꩨ ꩍ ,ꤨ ꥄ꩐ꣁ꩑ ꤠꤌꦾ ꩍ0꩒꩓-꩔꩕꩖꩗꩘꩙ ꤼꦾꪊ. ꮏꮐ겲 ꬸꪸ겳ꫀ겴ꬸ겵겶ꬴ 겷겸겹겺겻
ꥄ 겼걿ꤘ ꤆ꢃꢳꢡ꣩ ꦌꢳ꤃ I ꣨ꢳ경 겾ꢏ꣩ ꤺ꣨£� 겿ꨬ곀 MꢳPꢑ ꢃ꧀ꢳꢃ ꤕꥍ꣩ 곁곂ꤑꥄꯨꭔ곃 계ꮫ곅 곆ꦽ ꢢꤨ 곇ꢳꤠ곈ꤘ ꧍꣩ 곉 곊 ꨚ꣯ 곋 곌 ꤕH꣩ 곍ꤳꥎꢃꢳꦷ곎 ꤭ꮇ ꯔꤑ ꢥꢏꤘ 곏ꢲꤓꮫ곐 Bꤘ굵 �1�> 곑ꨜꤡ곒꤭곓ꤨ 곔ꤼꦩ ꢳ곕곖 곗ꢃ 겇 ꢲꤼ곘ꤞꤨ ꩜ 곙꤭ꢲ곚 2 곛 곜 곝곞곟고 M꤭ꢤ ꢳ꣺꤃ ꢳꤠꤑ 곡 17 곢 ꣵꦐꢃ곣곤곥곦 곧골꤭ꦔ 갯곩ꤣ ꣴꢳ곪 ꤇ꪁꤣꢏ 곫ꢤ곬곭 곮곯 ꤭ꢏ 곰ꢳꢃ I ꢳU ꢛꢥ곱 곲ꢳ곳 •�ꤠꦑ ꢀsꢁy ꢀ.ꢁꢂdo ꤕKꤨ 곴공곶곷 ꭒ꤭ꢲ ꨚꤨ 곸곹곺곻 과ꩆꨟ꣺꤃ꬬ
QtX ACKꫀOWLUXiMEHT
꣬꣭ꢳ꧙꣩ ꩜ ꩝꩞꩟ꩠꩡꤽꨚꢳ )
ꭀWHl귯 ꩢꢃꢄ)·
ꤌN 5 � ꤇꣩ꩣ꧟ꩤꩥꩦ ꢏꤼTAꪊ굌 ꢲꢎꩧ꣺ꩨ"b ��iꢀ
�ii
:ꢀ��: �I�= �sꢀuꢁ; ꣯ꮫ ꩩ ꩪꤣ ꢲꩫ ꩬ ��
ꥄ꣬ꩭꩮ ꩯ꤇ꩰ TO ꢡ꧀£ ꩱꩲꢏ ꥄꩳꤨꩴꩵꩶ꩷ꢃ ꢳꥎ ꢳ꩸Nꤼ꩹ ꣯ꤌ ꩺ꣩ ꩻꦸꩼꢃ ꩽ ꩭꩾ ꩿꪀꢡꪁꪂ ꪃ a굵ꪄꪅ 1M ..ꪆꪇꪈꪉꪊ ꢳꩵꪋꪌꨚꪍ ꪎꢳꪏꪐꪑꪒꦜꪓꦾ ꥃ lHꢳꢃ ꤇ꤘ ꪔꤨꪕꪖ ꣬ꪗꪘꪙꪚꪛ꣩ꪒꪜ ꪝ ꪞ ꪟꪠꢏ꤃ 1꧀£ ꢲꪊꪡꪢꪣ ꪤ 궠ꢏꢒꥄN ꪥꢤꪦ ꪧꪨꪩꢓꪪ ꪫ ꪬꪭ ꪮ ꤙ ꢳꯏꢃꪨ굴ꩨ ꪯꪰꢉꤳꪱ 1Hꪨ ꤋꯊ
ꪲꥌꪳ ꨞꤘ ꤭꣨ꤠꪱ: •
W
ꤨꪴꪵ�ꪶꪷto•ꢀꢁ
(!.ꢀ piꢁ or
,BꣴO곽ꢀDꤘ 곾곿
S
ꤘ
U
관
P
ꢃ
ER
•
V
괁
I
SO괂R
ꢢꢏ
S'
괃
C[
괄ꢁꢂꢃ
ꢏ
ꢂ
ꦑ
C
괅
ꢄ
•
ꢅ•
?I I00-�ꢀ ꤇괆 ꤐ괇괈 ꤭ꥎꤑ
ꢀ
괉 괊ꫡ괋 괌 ꤇ꥉ괍 � 괎ꣵ괏ꤨ 괐 ꫡ광 괒 ꩜ ꤨꤏ 괓괔ꢑ ꤨ꣯괕괖 괗
ꨆ갫괘괙괚괛ꮴ 괜괝ꨚ괞ꤑ 괟ꪝ ꥌ괠 ꢲꢳ괡ꤣꢏꦑ 괢 ꤿ괣 ꢃꢳ괤꣬괥 ꫱l'ꢳiꩉꢑ 괦ꤠ괧ꢑ ꧴ꭱ괨괩ꢲꢳ괪 괫 괬괭ꢥꨙꦾ ꤭괮 괯 괰꣩괱꤭괲 ꩃ괳ꤋ괴ꢏꧢ괵ꢑ 괶ꨓꧢ꣩ꭻ 괷 괸괹괺 괻ꨓꫴ ꢳꢃ ꪚ괼괽 ꥌ괾 괿 굀ꥎ굁 굂 굃굄 ꢳ굅 l꯶ꢳꢲ 굆굇 ꧍ꦆ 갯ꧥꤠꢡꤘ ꣩ꨬꯧꤑ굈 ꢳ굉 ꢳ 굊 ꢳꦨ굋꣬ꢃ ꢵ꧳ ꢤRꦲ꣩ꧢ굌굍 굎ꢃ ꢏꤼꢃ 굏꤃ 교ꢳꤘ굑ꤪꩉ굍 굒 굓ꢳꢃ ꦷꥍꪁ 굔굕굖굗 ꣨ꢳꤨ f굘ꦔ굙 굚굛굜 ꫥ꣩ ꢳ 굝굞꣺ꢳ굟 궐Y 굠ꢼ ꢤꤓ굡ꢼꤵ 굢ꢢꨆ ꤵ
GMꢏG nmꪊ ꤡꤨ굣ꨞꢳ굤 ꩜ 굥ꪁ ꢳ굦굧ꦑ 굨 ꢵ꤭ꥄꪱ ꢃꢳ괤ꤨ 굩 굪ꨬ굫ꢳꢨ ꢳ구꣬국ꢼꢏ꧙꣔ꢑ 굮 SAꥄD ꤇굯ꪸꪹꪺꪻꪼ ꪽꪾ꪿ꫀ꫁ꫂ 군 ꣴ괽굱ꦇ ꢳ굲굳굟ꦡꬬꤨꬾꢳ ꣺꤭ꨍꨖꤠ꣒ꢳ ) 굴ꢳ굴
굵
굶굷굸굹굺o굻 Bꤘ_,굼=굽굾굿 궀 �궁=�- ltCh!
ꢂ
� 궂궃
ON�S � ꤼ꣼ ꤙ꣺ 궄ꢳ ꭒꬬ 궅궆ꢑ 궇 궈꣩ ꤇ꥉꤿꩆꤑ 궉ꮵꢀ/�ꢁ
궊ꦱ궋꤆ 굂 권 ꨬ궍ꥎ궎 궏 ꢵ걮 궐ꦅꢏAꢻ궑ꥎꤼ걏
��ꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅYꢆfꢇ B꣩ 1꧀꣩ ꢤꫛꫜ ��ꤋꢀꭇ
ꫝꩭꢳꪊ꫞ ꦹ꤇꫟ ꢃꤼ ꩪꤡ ꫠꫡꫢꤠ ꥄꢏꫣꫤꫥꤠꢃ ꫦ ꢳꫧꫨ ꢃꤼ ꫩ꣩ ꣰ꩃꢃ ꨄꫪꫫ ꫬ꣩ꫭꫮ꣩ꤑ ꤕl£ ꫯ ꫰ ꪔ꫱ꪇꫲꦅꫳꫴꫵꪊ ꫶꤭ꤣꤼ ꪎꢳꤨ ꬁꬂ Sꤘ ꩳꥄꢵꬃ꤁ꬄꤓ ꬅꬆꢳ꤆ꬉ ꬊ ꬋ ꬌ꫱ꬍꬎ꣩Nꢃ ꬑꬒ ꤴꬓꪊꬔꬕsꬉꬖ ꣩ꢏꥌ ꫤ ꤭ ꥄꬠ ꣰£ ꬡꬢ{ꤨ ꢳꨬ꤈ꢑ ꣩ꬣꬤꤑ ꥌꬥ ꬦꥎꤨꬨꬩꬪ꣒ꬫꬬ
SIꦫꥎAl-
"™ꢈꢉꢊ
ꬭꬮꥄꥎꢃ ꢏꢳꨞꤣ)ꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅ
6UPIWR'$ ꮏ궒궓궔궕궖궗궘
궙
ꭒY ꢲꬰꬱꬲ 괟ꦔꩃꨬ꣩ ꬳ ;•
ꬹꢏ꤃ꤥꬺ
ꢢ 궚ꤘ 궛궜ꤘ ꤺꣴꢳꢃ ꢳ궝궞궟 ꢃꮫ ꧍ꢼ ꢦ궠궡 궢 궣궤 궥궦궧ꢑ ꤭꫱ ꮢ ꣰ꨚꤨ ꢳ궨 ꤺ꧀꣩ 갫R£ ꣁꤌ 궩궪궫 ꢳꦨ궬ꤨ꤃ 궭 궮ꢳL 궯궰ꢦꢃꢊ 궱ꤼ궲 궳 ꣼궴 궵ꤽꢏꨟ괤궶 궷꤭ꮇ ꨖ ꫤꥎꢲꢳ궸 ꤨꢃꢳꨜ굄ꢑ 궹궺 궻ꢑ
ꢋf
,
ꢃ ꤣ ꢃ T꣱귎 귏
0 � 귁귂귃 귄귅귆귇귈귉귊귋 귌귍궼궽궾궿귀
A ꢄ
ꢃ
ꢳ귐귑 ꢂ/ꢃꢄ
ꬴꬵꫀꬶꬷꪻꬸ Qw1ss1Oꫀs
귒ꤓꤘ 귓귔 ꭀ귕귖꧘귗 ꤭귘ꥄ귙귚ꮼꪝ귛규ꢼ귝귞ꩆ
ꬻꬼꪊ꣬ꬽꬾ ꬾꤌ ꬿꭀꤺꭁ 6ꭂꭃꭄꭅꭆꭇ {3ꢳꭇ ꭅꭈꭉꭊꭋ ꭌ ꤕꦸꤡ ꭍ0ꭎꭏꤨꭐꭑ ꭒ ꢳꨆꬾꪣ ꭓ ꭔꭕꭖꢃꭗꢻꭘ 귟ꥎꧢ균 ꤇굈Nꢳ귡귢ꥉꬺ ꭙ ꧍꣩ ꭚꥉ꭛ꭜꭝꭞꢏꭟ ꭠꭡ ꭢ ꭣꤠꭤ ꢳꥎꭥꩭꭦ ꤌꭧꭨꭩ ꢢꥎꨜ꣩ꯀꪁꤨꢃ꫱ ꫴꢳ꭪ ꭫ꩉꤠ ꥉꧼ ? Bꤘ· 귣ꢡꧣ
ꢳꫤꤨ꧷ W, ꭰꤵꢳꭱꤝ ꣩ꢃ �l. ꭲꭳꭴR ꤌF ꢼꭵꭶꢃ ꧌ ꢲꫤꭷꭸ ꤓꥉꭹ ꭺ ꭻꭼꭽꢃ ꤡꨬꭾꤑ꣩ꭿ ꣱ꪊꮀꧼ 갸8ꢑ 1ꭂ ꮁ ꮂꥉꮃ ꮄꮅꮆꢑ ꮇꢳꮈ 갸25 ꥉꦾ걽ꢑ ꤋ꣱굫ꤑ ꤭꣩ꬿꨞꮉꮊ ꮋ
ꮌꩋ꣩ꮍꮎ
ꮏꮐꮑ ꮏꪹUꫀꮏIL'ꬴ ꮒꮓꮏꮔꮕꮖꪸꮓꬸ ꮓꬸꪻꮗꮘꮓꮙꮚ
ꢢ ꦄꦅꮛ ꮜꪁꮝꤘ ꥏꥍꢳ꧙ ꦷꮞ ꮟTꤥ ꨓꮠꥎꮡꨙ ꮢ ꦷ굜꣩ ꮣꮤ ꮥ ꮦꮧꮨ꤃ꨖꮩ y ꩃ ꮪꮫꮬꮭ ꮮꨋꤘ Wꩆꤘ 귤귥ꩆ ꮯ D ꢲ꣱ꮳꮴ ꤿꢲ괟 r 귦귧ꥄ귨ꩭꤷ1귩귪-귫귬귭 ꮵ 귮ꢃ귯 귰 ꤆곏ꢏ 귱귲꣒ꤠꤼꢁꮰꮱ ꮲ �: ꢏ; y,ꤑꮶꣽ꣺ꢳꮷꭠꥎ ꣱ꢏ ꢳꮸꤳꮹ ꯞꦔꨋ ꢵꩴꮺT꫱ ꮻꮼꢃ 10 ꢢꮽ꧗ꤼꮾ꣩ꤠꢃ ꨚꥎ ꢳꮿꯀꪱꤿꥎꤢꯁ ꯂꯃꦄ ꦷꥍꤣ ꦱꢃꩃꯄꢳꯅꤨ ꯆ ꥏꦸꨟ ꪏTꯇ ꯈ ꯉꭀꯊꯋꯌꮧꨇꨋꦆꬬ OY ꢃiꢄꢅTWMꢆꢇ귳귴귵귶 ꤓꤣ귷
ꩃLꤨꤌ lH꣩ m균 ꯍ ꯎꯏꯐꯑꯒ ꢳꯓ LOꢃ꤆ •ꢳꢑ. ·a: ꯔꤑ ·c· ꨚN ꩠꦆꢼ ꤨꥄꨞPLꢼꢑ ꯕꯖꯗꨬ꩑ ꩑ꤌ ꯘꯙꢤꩆꤼꯚꯛ ꨚꥎ ꢳꯜꯝꤑꯞꢏꯟ ꯠꯡ ꫡꯢ ꯣꯊꯤꯥ ꩜ ꯦꨬ꤃ꯧꯨꨋꯩ꣩ ꤨꯊ꣱ꢏꥃ꤭ꩆꯪ꯫
꣺꯬꯭ ꤇꤭ꦑꦆꤨ -7
꣺IY ꭀꭰ ꯰ Tꤜ£ cm ꯱ ꯲ꦐ꯳ꣵꨋ꯴ꤡ
ꤨꢃꯞꨜ£ ꯵ ꨬꢳ꯶꯷꯸ꥎꥄꢳ
. ꢂe,i I
ꪁPꫤ겆ꤥ ꯹j ..
Attachment C
New Securities
Attachment D
Existing Subdivision
Agreement
Attachment E
Release of Subdivision
Agreement
Recording Requested by:
The City of Victorville
When Recorded Please Return To:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
APN Nos. 3134-571-01 thru 76; 3134-581-01 thru 10; 3134-591-01 thru 36 Recording of this document is fee exempt under
Government Code Section 6103.
No Documentary Transfer Tax is due on the document pursuant to Revenue Taxation Code Section 11922
RELEASE OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Tract Map No. 17292-1
WHEREAS, the City of Victorville, hereinafter called “CITY” entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Trimark Pacific- Olivine, LLC., hereinafter called “DEVELOPER”, for the security of Tract Map No. 17292-1, hereinafter collectively called “PROPERTY”; and
WHEREAS, said separate Subdivision Agreement imposed duties, obligations, and requirements on the City and DEVELOPER; and
WHEREAS, such Subdivision Agreement were recorded on April 13, 2007, as Document No. 2007-0227735 the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino hereinafter (“County Recorder’s Office”); and
WHEREAS, as evidenced by that certain Grant Deed recorded on October 4, 2024, as Document No. 2024-0238852 in the County Recorder’s Office, DEVELOPER subsequently sold the PROPERTY to Richmond American Homes of Maryland Inc., a Maryland Corporation, hereinafter “Richmond American”, who has now executed a new Subdivision Improvement Agreement and posted substitute securities for Tract Map No. 17292-1 pursuant to Victorville Municipal Code sections
17.64.060 and 17.64.065(k): and
WHEREAS, the Subdivision Improvement Agreement between Richmond American and CITY was recorded on _________day of _______________, _______ as Document No. ___________________________ in the County Recorder’s Office; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration that the PROPERTY having substitute securities and a new Subdivision Improvement Agreement, the CITY hereby releases DEVELOPER from any further duty, obligation, or requirement imposed pursuant to Document No. 2007-0227735 only, and the same are hereby deemed of no further form and effect and shall cease to exist as a lien, duty obligation, or cloud on the title to the following described PROPERTY:
See Exhibit “A”
I hereby state that all performances, obligations, and requirements required by the Subdivision Agreement, herein identified, per Title 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code required for Tract Map No. 17292-1 have been complied with on the hereinabove described PROPERTY.
_________________________
Fredy A. Bonilla, City Engineer
R.C.E. 70349
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
By: _____________________________
Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney
RISK MANAGEMENT:
_________________________________
Sandra Bostick, Risk Manager
EXHIBIT “A”
Lots 1 through 122, inclusive, of Tract Map No. 17292-1, in the city of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map filed in book 327, pages 74 through 85 inclusive of maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.
Attachment F
Existing Land Division
Improvement Construction
Agreement
Attachment G
Satisfaction and Release of Land
Division Construction
Improvement Agreement
Recording Requested by:
The City of Victorville
When Recorded Please Return To:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
APN Nos. 3134-571-01 thru 76; 3134-581-01 thru 10; 3134-591-01 thru 36 Recording of this document is fee exempt under Government Code Section 27383
SATISFACTION AND RELEASE OF
LAND DIVISION IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
Tract Map No. 17292-1
WHEREAS, the City of Victorville, hereinafter referred to as the “CITY,” entered into a Land Division Improvements Construction Agreement with Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, hereinafter called Developer”, pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the development of Tract Map No. 17292-1, hereinafter called “PROPERTY”; and
WHEREAS, said separate Land Division Improvements Construction Agreement imposed certain duties, obligations, and requirements on the CITY and DEVLOPER; and
WHEREAS, the duties, obligations, and requirements established by said Land Division Improvements Construction Agreement were recorded on March 13, 2006 , as Document No. 2006-0169404 in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County; and
WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER sold the PROPERTY to Pacific Summit-Summerfield, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company , who then sold the PROPERTY to Richmond American Homes of Maryland Inc., a Maryland Corporation, who has now executed a new Subdivision Agreement with the CITY per Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.050; and
WHEREAS, the new Subdivision Improvement Agreement between Richmond American Homes of Maryland Inc., a Maryland Corporation and the CITY was recorded on ,2025 as Document No. the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration that these properties having a security bonds against them by and between Richmond American Homes of Maryland Inc., a Maryland Corporation, and the CITY and to be in compliance with said agreement hereinabove stated, the CITY hereby releases DEVELOPER from any further duty, obligation, or requirement imposed pursuant to the above indicated document only, and the same is hereby deemed of no further form and effect and shall cease to exist as a lien, duty obligation, or cloud on the title to the following described real properties:
See Exhibit “A”
FURTHERMORE, I hereby affirm that the Land Division Improvements Construction Agreement referenced herein is being released in accordance with Title 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code, due to a change in ownership of the PROPERTY and the recordation of a new Subdivision Improvements Agreement with Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland Corporation.
_________________________
Fredy A. Bonilla, City Engineer
R.C.E No. 70349
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
By:_____________________
Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
City Attorney
Exhibit “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Tract 17292-1
Lots 1 through 122, inclusive, of Tract Map No. 17292-1, in the city of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map filed in book 327, pages 74 through 85 inclusive of maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.
Attachment H
Existing Utility Surety
Agreement
Attachment I
Satisfaction and
Release of Utility Surety
Agreement
Recording Requested by:
The City of Victorville
When Recorded Please Return To:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
APN Nos. 3134-571-01 thru 76; 3134-581-01 thru 10; 3134-591-01 thru 36 Recording of this document is fee exempt under Government Code Section 27383
SATISFACTION AND RELEASE OF
UTILITY SURETY AGREEMENT
Tract Map No. 17292-1
WHEREAS, the City of Victorville, hereinafter referred to as the “CITY,” entered into a Utility Surety Agreement with Trimark Pacific-Olivine, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, hereinafter called Developer”, pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the development of Tract Map No. 17292-1, hereinafter called “PROPERTY”; and
WHEREAS, said separate Utility Surety Agreement imposed certain duties, obligations, and requirements on the CITY and DEVLOPER; and
WHEREAS, the duties, obligations, and requirements established by said Utility Surety Agreement were recorded on April 13, 2007 , as Document No. 2007-0227736 in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER sold the PROPERTY to Pacific Summit-Summerfield, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company , who then sold the PROPERTY to Richmond American Homes of Maryland Inc., a Maryland Corporation, who has now executed a new Subdivision Agreement with the CITY per Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.050; and
WHEREAS, the new Subdivision Improvement Agreement between Richmond American Homes of Maryland Inc., a Maryland Corporation and the CITY was recorded on ,2025 as Document No. the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration that these properties having a security bonds against them by and between Richmond American Homes of Maryland Inc., a Maryland Corporation, and the CITY and to be in compliance with said agreement hereinabove stated, the CITY hereby releases DEVELOPER from any further duty, obligation, or requirement imposed pursuant to the above indicated document only, and the same is hereby deemed of no further form and effect and shall cease to exist as a lien, duty obligation, or cloud on the title to the following described real properties:
See Exhibit “A”
FURTHERMORE, I hereby affirm that the Utility Surety Agreement referenced herein is being released in accordance with Title 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code, due to a change in ownership of the PROPERTY and the recordation of a new Subdivision Improvements Agreement with Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland Corporation. _________________________
Fredy A. Bonilla, City Engineer
R.C.E No. 70349
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
By:_____________________
Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
City Attorney
Exhibit “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Tract 17292-1
Lots 1 through 122, inclusive, of Tract Map No. 17292-1, in the city of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map filed in book 327, pages 74 through 85 inclusive of maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.
Item Number: 10
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Alex Jauregui, City Planner
Subject:
Substitution of Trustee, Deed of Reconveyance and Cancellation of CC&Rs for Residential Rehabilitation Program case number 23-12-21 (14221 Surrey Ct., Victorville, CA 92394); as well as acceptance and reallocation of associated Program Income funds Recommendation:
That City Council take the following actions regarding Residential Rehabilitation Program Case No. 23-12-21:
(1) Approve the Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance; (2) Confirm the required Cancellation of the original Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs);
(3) Authorize the execution of the Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance as well as the Cancellation of the original CC&Rs by the Deputy City Manager; (4) Accept the payoff of the loan receivable to the Residential Rehabilitation Program Income Account; and
(5) Adopt Resolution No. 25-012, amending the annual budget for fiscal year 2024- 2025 reallocating the subject $14,408.54 Residential Rehabilitation Program – Program Income funds to the Residential Rehabilitation Program.
Fiscal Impact:
Approval of the item will allow for the acceptance and reallocation of $14,408.54 in program income from the Residential Rehabilitation Program (RRP), which will be used to benefit another participant in the RRP in accordance with the City’s adopted Annual Action Plan. This proposal would cause the following revenue and expenditure budget accounts to be updated to reflect the acceptance and reallocation of the subject income.
Budget Account Number:
2853025-47520-20733 – Residential Rehabilitation Program Income (Revenue) 2853025-52300-20733 – Residential Rehabilitation Program Income (Expenditure) 3 9
8 0
Per Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules, program income must be spent before yearly Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocations can be spent. Therefore, this reallocation request of $14,408.54 in RRP Program Income into the current Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget will benefit additional RRP participants, as outlined in the 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan. The RRP maintains a waiting list of over 130 residents, which would utilize over a year’s worth of future funding dedicated to this program. Due to the popularity of the program and an expanding wait list, approval of this request to reallocate the subject program income will allow the City to assist a greater number of residents in accordance with the adopted 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan and the 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Approval of this acceptance and reallocation of Residential Rehabilitation Program (RRP) program income will enable the City to further fulfill the following Goals outlined in the 2024-2026 Strategic Plan:
• Goal A (Financial Sustainability) – Reallocating program income from a completed RRP project provides funds to assist additional residents of the City of Victorville while utilizing a revenue opportunity that does not impact the General Fund. • Goal C (Community and Economic Development) – Utilizing available funds for ongoing projects such as the RRP help maintain the City’s existing housing stock, thereby supporting the preservation of the community.
Background:
The Residential Rehabilitation Program (RRP) is designed to promote local beautification, increase property values, boost curb appeal, and correct any Health and Safety Code, Building Code or Victorville Municipal Code violations. The RRP is provided through Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding as a deferred payment loan at 3% interest in amounts ranging from $1,000 to $20,000. Loans provided are secured against the property for the term of ten (10) years. The loan can be forgiven should participants remain as the property owner and occupy the dwelling as their principal residence for no less than the program’s 10-year term.
Discussion:
On December 21, 2023, the Residential Rehabilitation Program (RRP) Participant (the “Participant”) received a loan in the amount of $13,955 to aid in the rehabilitation of the home at 14221 Surrey Ct., Victorville, CA 92394. Rehabilitation included: painting the exterior, replacement of damaged bathroom doors, and front yard desert landscape. All items were completed using an RRP loan. Subsequently, the Participant requested that the City reconvey the Deed of Trust that secured the RRP loan. This request was made due to the terms of the Promissory Note, Deed of Trust, and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) being satisfied with the repayment of the subject RRP loan funds and associated simple interest on January 21, 2025.
According to the Promissory Note, the repayment of the RRP loan required the Participant to pay an amount of the principal loan of $13,955, plus 3% simple interest, calculated at 3 9
8 0
$453.54 based on a final loan term of 1 year and 1 month ([$418.65 simple interest – Year 1] + [$34.89 simple interest - 1 month] = $453.54). The Participant has since paid the principal and simple interest balance totaling $14,408.54.
Since the Participant has satisfied the terms of the Promissory Note, Deed of Trust, and CC&Rs (e.g. occupancy requirements, maintenance standards, affordability covenants, etc.), the Participant has requested a release of the encumbrance of the CC&Rs per “Article V” of the original CC&Rs, which also necessitates a Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance.
Attachments: A. Resolution No. 25-012
B. Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance
C. Cancellation and Release of CC&Rs
D. Original Promissory Note, Deed of Trust, CC&Rs and Notice of Affordability Restrictions
ATTACHMENT A
Resolution No. 25-012
RESOLUTION NO. 25-012
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE AMENDING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Victorville did heretofore submit to the City Council an estimate of the expenditures and revenues of the City departments and offices, together with a proposed budget for the fiscal year 2024-2025; and
WHEREAS, copies of said budget were prepared and distributed to the City Council, approved by the City Council prior to June 30, 2024, and have been available for the inspection by the public in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Victorville; and
WHEREAS, after preparation of the budget, a need to amend the budget is being recommended to the Council for approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or his designee will provide all necessary justification for the budget amendment as an attachment to this resolution or in the associated City Council agenda report.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the annual budget for the fiscal year 2024 -2025 for the City of Victorville be hereby amended to reflect a change in the amounts and associated accounts listed below and as described in the corresponding Agenda Item.
Account Amount Adjusted
RRP Program Income 2853025-47520-20733 $14,408.54
RRP Program Income 2853025-52300-20733 $14,408.54
SECTION 2. That copies of such amended budget, certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the auditors of the City of Victorville and in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and certified copies thereof shall be made available for use by City departments, offices and subsidiary districts of the City.
ATTACHMENT B
Substitution of Trustee and Deed of
Reconveyance
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
ATTN: SCOTT WEBB
14343 CIVIC DRIVE
VICTORVILLE, CA 92392
RE: RRP Case No. 23-12-21
________________________________________________________________________________________
APN: 3104-182-39
14221 Surrey Ct.
Victorville, CA 92394
SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE AND FULL RECONVEYANCE
Owner and Holder of the Note secured by the Deed of Trust dated December 21, 2023 executed by Ulyses Lopez and Shawntay Lopez, as original Trustor and the City of Victorville, as original Trustee:
and City of Victorville, a Municipal Corporation, as original Beneficiary; which Deed of Trust recorded June 14, 2024 as Instrument No. 2024-0138154 of the Official Records of San Bernardino County, in the State of California; and
The UNDERSIGNED being the present legal owner and holder of the indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust regarding 14221 Surrey Ct., Victorville, CA, 92394 in the County of San Bernardino and the State of California, and more particularly described in “EXHIBIT A” (attached) , hereby substitutes themselves as Trustee in lieu of above named Trustee under said Deed of Trust.
The UNDERSIGNED hereby accepts said appointments as Trustee under said Deed of Trust and as Successor Trustee pursuant to request of said Owner and Holder and in accordance with the provisions of said Deed of Trust does HEREBY RECONVEY WITHOUT WARRANTY TO THE PERSON OR PERSONS LEGALLY ENTITLED THERETO all estate now held by him/her/them as Trustee under said Deed of Trust.
IN WITNESS WHEREO F OWNER AND SUCCESOR TRUSTEE THE UNDERS IGNED has caused the execution on:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Date:_______________ By: ______________________________ Scott Webb
Deputy City Manager
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that real property located in the City of Victorville, San Bernardino County, State of California described as follows:
LOT 153 OF TRACT NO. 15479, IN THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 251, PAGE(S) 23 TO 36, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
APN: 3104-182-39
14221 Surrey Ct.
Victorville, CA 92394
State of California
County of San Bernardino
On __________ , before me, , Personally appeared Date Name and Title of the Officer
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
Name(s) of Signer(s)
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature Place Notary Seal Above
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
ATTACHMENT C
Cancellation and Release of CC&Rs
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
ATTN: SCOTT WEBB
14343 CIVIC DRIVE
VICTORVILLE, CA 92392
RE: RRP Case No. 23-12-21
______________________________________________________________________
(EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 and/or 6103)
APN: 3104-182-39
14221 Surrey Ct.
Victorville, CA 92394
CANCELLATION OF DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS AND
RELEASE OF NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF
PROPERTY
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the City of Victorville, a Municipal Corporation (the “City”) is the sole beneficiary of that certain Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) executed by the City of Victorville Development Department on December 21, 2023 and recorded on June 14, 2024 as Instrument No. 2024-0138155 in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, C alifornia (the “Affordable Housing Restrictions”), upon that certain real property identified in t he Affordable Housing Restrictions and described in the attached Exhibit A (the “Property”) . The Affordable Housing Restrictions were recorded concurrently with the Notice of Affordability Restrictions on Transfer of Property, executed on December 21, 2023 by Development Department, and recorded on June 14, 202 4 as Instrument No. 20 24-0138153 in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California (the “Notice of Affordability Restrictions on Transfer of Property”).
Pursuant to the t erms of t he Affordable Housing Restrictions, the City shall execute a release of the encumbrances provided that the homeowner has repaid the Residential Rehabilitation Program loan in full and remitted the accrued interest payment to the City of Victorvil le. As the pre ceding co nditions have now been met, the City of Victorville hereby terminates the Affordable Housing Restrictions and forever releases the encumbrances of the Affordable Housing Restrictions from the Property. Accordingly, the Notice of Aff ordability Rest rictions on Transfer of Property is also terminated and released.
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
DATE: _____________________ By:
Scott Webb
Deputy City Manager
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that real property located in the City of Victorville, San Bernardino County, State of California described as follows:
LOT 153 OF TRACT NO. 15479, IN THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2 51, PAGE(S) 23 TO 36, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
APN: 3104-182-39
14221 Surrey Ct.
Victorville, CA 92394
State of California
County of San Bernardino
On __________ , before me, , Personally appeared Date Name and Title of the Officer
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
Name(s) of Signer(s)
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature Place Notary Seal Above
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
ATTACHMENT D
Original Promissory Note, Deed of
Trust, CC&Rs and Notice of Affordability
Restrictions
Item Number: 11
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
C. Eric Ray, Airport Director
Subject:
Southern California Logistics Airport Annual Activity Report for Calendar Year 2024 Recommendation:
That the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority (“SCLAA”) Board review and file the attached Southern California Logistics Airport (“SCLA”) Annual Activity Report for Calendar Year 2024.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Strategic Goal A, Financial Sustainability, and Goal C, Community and Economic Development. The SCLA will continue to present this report on an annual basis to the SCLAA Board to report the progress being made at the SCLA.
Background:
From the SCLA’s humble beginnings in 1994, and following the economic crisis caused by the closure of the former George Air Force Base, the SCLA has emerged as a thriving industrial airport and business center. In 1988, Victorville City leaders first learned the Department of Defense planned to close the base taking with it 7,500 jobs and the buying power of many Air Force families who patronized local Victorville businesses. Thanks to ingenuity and hard work, the City of Victorville transformed the base into a thriving business center that is the area's largest employer offering 4,500 jobs. The SCLA is now home to 62 businesses including Fortune 500 companies like Boeing and GE Aerospace.
With on-airport and off-airport development, the SCLA serves manufacturing, warehousing, aviation, and aerospace companies in one location, and it is driving our local and regional economy.
5 7
0 Discussion:
The SCLA’s mission is to replace the 7,500 jobs that were lost with the former George Air Force closure and to operate a safe and self-sufficient airport, in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and redevelop the SCLA property while emphasizing customer service and professionalism. This annual activity report for calendar year 2024, provides a summary of the ongoing efforts and successes of the SCLA.
Staff remains available for any questions or comments you may have.
CER/lf
Attachments: A. Southern California Logistics Airport Annual Activity Report for Calendar Year 2024.
ATTACHMENT A
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
LOGISTICS AIRPORT
ANNUAL ACTIVITY
REPORT FOR CALENDAR
YEAR 2024
Item Number: 12
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Payroll Demand Schedule No. 5B
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 5B for Payroll Period November 8, 2024, through November 22, 2024, in the amount of $2,324,572.15 covering Check Nos. 34382 through 34395, including Vendor checks. Also included are Advice Nos. 321449 through 322012, per adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (period covering July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025).
Fiscal Impact:
A total fiscal impact of $2,324,572.15 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the payments by check numbers.
Discussion:
I hereby certify that the claims or demands covered by the attached list of warrants have been audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and that said claims or demands are accurate and the funds are available for payment thereof.
Attachments: A. Payroll Report PPE 112224
Attachment A
Payroll Report PPE 112224
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 1 of 16 11/29/2024 Total Net
$501.97
$2,517.23
$364.20
$364.20
$364.20
$364.20
$2,731.57
$976.23
$745.92
$67.00
$100.00
$50.00
$50.00
$422.31
9,619.03
34395 13491 11/29/2024
Checks Total
34393 1182 11/29/2024
34394 1182 11/29/2024
34391 1182 11/29/2024
34392 1182 11/29/2024
34389 3939 11/29/2024
34390 3678 11/29/2024
34387 3556 11/29/2024
34388 3853 11/29/2024
34385 3310 11/29/2024
34386 3614 11/29/2024
34383 3909 11/29/2024
34384 3554 11/29/2024
Check Number Employee ID Check Date
34382 3466 11/29/2024
Checks
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period Beginning: November 08, 2024 through November 22, 2024 City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 2 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
321449 3396 11/29/2024 $2,420.93
321450 1099 11/29/2024 $532.55
321451 3243 11/29/2024 $5,512.22
321452 2115 11/29/2024 $6,204.32
321453 3502 11/29/2024 $2,846.92
321454 3142 11/29/2024 $1,975.41
321455 3640 11/29/2024 $2,055.30
321456 3527 11/29/2024 $2,249.54
321457 3297 11/29/2024 $504.28
321458 3551 11/29/2024 $501.97
321459 3458 11/29/2024 $501.97
321460 3229 11/29/2024 $5,663.59
321461 3290 11/29/2024 $2,571.99
321462 1064 11/29/2024 $8,890.58
321463 3467 11/29/2024 $2,496.33
321464 1706 11/29/2024 $5,109.24
321465 2395 11/29/2024 $5,171.57
321466 3764 11/29/2024 $2,518.20
321467 2211 11/29/2024 $5,386.02
321468 3747 11/29/2024 $2,183.05
321469 3625 11/29/2024 $1,948.10
321470 2624 11/29/2024 $3,246.07
321471 3043 11/29/2024 $2,594.33
321472 3940 11/29/2024 $944.40
321473 3403 11/29/2024 $2,090.55
321474 1748 11/29/2024 $2,925.91
321475 3848 11/29/2024 $1,692.75
321476 3913 11/29/2024 $2,061.27
321477 3019 11/29/2024 $5,098.79
321478 3638 11/29/2024 $4,515.90
321479 3561 11/29/2024 $2,938.72
321480 3920 11/29/2024 $2,210.22
321481 3630 11/29/2024 $2,334.84
321482 2366 11/29/2024 $2,271.07
321483 3750 11/29/2024 $2,140.38
321484 3835 11/29/2024 $2,148.75
321485 3521 11/29/2024 $2,738.65
321486 2093 11/29/2024 $1,883.61
321487 2019 11/29/2024 $3,049.77
321488 3753 11/29/2024 $3,407.58
321489 3915 11/29/2024 $4,447.44
321490 3917 11/29/2024 $1,942.47
321491 3744 11/29/2024 $2,607.64
321492 2606 11/29/2024 $2,478.61
Advices
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 3 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321493 3660 11/29/2024 $2,096.64
321494 3914 11/29/2024 $2,413.16
321495 1635 11/29/2024 $5,083.22
321496 3327 11/29/2024 $2,510.79
321497 3752 11/29/2024 $2,511.18
321498 3912 11/29/2024 $2,001.51
321499 3911 11/29/2024 $1,797.75
321500 2618 11/29/2024 $2,704.03
321501 3845 11/29/2024 $3,325.87
321502 2619 11/29/2024 $2,497.06
321503 2603 11/29/2024 $2,025.57
321504 2491 11/29/2024 $3,226.74
321505 2235 11/29/2024 $3,927.95
321506 3916 11/29/2024 $3,398.45
321507 3889 11/29/2024 $1,816.59
321508 3045 11/29/2024 $2,420.90
321509 3755 11/29/2024 $2,165.70
321510 3608 11/29/2024 $4,447.44
321511 3758 11/29/2024 $3,777.28
321512 3817 11/29/2024 $2,040.74
321513 3362 11/29/2024 $2,682.85
321514 2297 11/29/2024 $2,436.13
321515 2232 11/29/2024 $3,107.24
321516 1957 11/29/2024 $3,049.64
321517 3809 11/29/2024 $1,726.56
321518 3246 11/29/2024 $3,515.20
321519 2042 11/29/2024 $5,756.21
321520 3714 11/29/2024 $1,896.27
321521 3742 11/29/2024 $2,150.08
321522 3849 11/29/2024 $4,186.83
321523 3863 11/29/2024 $2,133.05
321524 3879 11/29/2024 $2,066.15
321525 3846 11/29/2024 $3,625.38
321526 3697 11/29/2024 $5,850.46
321527 3868 11/29/2024 $4,145.23
321528 2102 11/29/2024 $3,250.62
321529 2233 11/29/2024 $2,725.25
321530 3653 11/29/2024 $3,242.93
321531 3865 11/29/2024 $2,182.41
321532 2032 11/29/2024 $4,012.48
321533 3869 11/29/2024 $2,066.15
321534 3499 11/29/2024 $2,789.40
321535 3924 11/29/2024 $3,429.25
321536 3867 11/29/2024 $3,134.56
321537 2323 11/29/2024 $3,890.21
321538 1767 11/29/2024 $2,938.38
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 4 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321539 3508 11/29/2024 $2,728.90
321540 3740 11/29/2024 $2,009.33
321541 2225 11/29/2024 $4,451.89
321542 3544 11/29/2024 $2,196.62
321543 3221 11/29/2024 $3,918.91
321544 1855 11/29/2024 $364.20
321545 3627 11/29/2024 $3,318.47
321546 3757 11/29/2024 $3,840.76
321547 1533 11/29/2024 $2,681.23
321548 2833 11/29/2024 $2,484.26
321549 3700 11/29/2024 $2,066.16
321550 3652 11/29/2024 $2,467.91
321551 1426 11/29/2024 $1,232.69
321552 3703 11/29/2024 $2,252.58
321553 2254 11/29/2024 $3,244.61
321554 3618 11/29/2024 $2,277.30
321555 3354 11/29/2024 $4,023.69
321556 3623 11/29/2024 $1,201.47
321557 3400 11/29/2024 $2,547.55
321558 3547 11/29/2024 $1,228.73
321559 3933 11/29/2024 $1,220.49
321560 3673 11/29/2024 $1,350.06
321561 3702 11/29/2024 $2,900.80
321562 2742 11/29/2024 $3,179.88
321563 3934 11/29/2024 $4,248.00
321564 3746 11/29/2024 $2,240.70
321565 3089 11/29/2024 $3,333.91
321566 3641 11/29/2024 $2,066.15
321567 3672 11/29/2024 $1,269.64
321568 3854 11/29/2024 $2,341.89
321569 3634 11/29/2024 $2,781.27
321570 3805 11/29/2024 $2,299.85
321571 2249 11/29/2024 $4,947.25
321572 3650 11/29/2024 $2,092.22
321573 3938 11/29/2024 $976.23
321574 3876 11/29/2024 $3,437.88
321575 3663 11/29/2024 $2,233.35
321576 3541 11/29/2024 $2,931.92
321577 2499 11/29/2024 $3,667.98
321578 3379 11/29/2024 $2,727.57
321579 3694 11/29/2024 $2,862.77
321580 3737 11/29/2024 $2,661.51
321581 2105 11/29/2024 $5,536.69
321582 3474 11/29/2024 $3,296.98
321583 2515 11/29/2024 $3,802.08
321584 3636 11/29/2024 $2,621.88
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 5 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321585 2679 11/29/2024 $3,282.28
321586 3490 11/29/2024 $2,543.72
321587 3475 11/29/2024 $2,834.07
321588 2181 11/29/2024 $3,017.83
321589 3353 11/29/2024 $3,249.36
321590 3735 11/29/2024 $4,302.74
321591 3930 11/29/2024 $1,269.64
321592 3880 11/29/2024 $1,258.56
321593 3542 11/29/2024 $3,093.07
321594 3731 11/29/2024 $2,279.40
321595 1955 11/29/2024 $4,658.38
321596 3719 11/29/2024 $1,882.29
321597 1632 11/29/2024 $2,566.16
321598 3941 11/29/2024 $700.33
321599 3736 11/29/2024 $2,924.75
321600 3692 11/29/2024 $2,868.15
321601 3147 11/29/2024 $3,346.71
321602 3881 11/29/2024 $1,296.91
321603 3732 11/29/2024 $2,543.72
321604 3148 11/29/2024 $2,833.61
321605 3808 11/29/2024 $3,476.50
321606 3195 11/29/2024 $2,760.83
321607 3884 11/29/2024 $1,296.91
321608 3626 11/29/2024 $2,531.43
321609 3602 11/29/2024 $3,180.25
321610 3112 11/29/2024 $2,561.47
321611 1970 11/29/2024 $2,998.52
321612 3185 11/29/2024 $2,431.84
321613 1520 11/29/2024 $3,018.08
321614 2605 11/29/2024 $2,285.02
321615 3505 11/29/2024 $5,932.93
321616 2540 11/29/2024 $5,109.85
321617 2377 11/29/2024 $3,207.08
321618 1079 11/29/2024 $3,244.98
321619 2259 11/29/2024 $4,866.61
321620 2312 11/29/2024 $2,773.35
321621 3510 11/29/2024 $2,622.44
321622 3637 11/29/2024 $2,962.81
321623 3628 11/29/2024 $2,549.80
321624 3068 11/29/2024 $2,220.87
321625 3633 11/29/2024 $2,898.67
321626 3129 11/29/2024 $3,878.44
321627 3816 11/29/2024 $2,834.78
321628 1998 11/29/2024 $3,157.25
321629 2111 11/29/2024 $3,387.56
321630 3543 11/29/2024 $2,289.00
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 6 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321631 3303 11/29/2024 $4,302.65
321632 3802 11/29/2024 $2,731.57
321633 3558 11/29/2024 $2,895.66
321634 1655 11/29/2024 $4,369.03
321635 3361 11/29/2024 $2,029.28
321636 3285 11/29/2024 $2,948.65
321637 1529 11/29/2024 $2,059.84
321638 3346 11/29/2024 $2,066.72
321639 1776 11/29/2024 $3,611.36
321640 2600 11/29/2024 $3,243.67
321641 3192 11/29/2024 $2,120.06
321642 2655 11/29/2024 $2,334.84
321643 3393 11/29/2024 $2,002.62
321644 3749 11/29/2024 $2,602.14
321645 2798 11/29/2024 $2,663.86
321646 2522 11/29/2024 $3,090.54
321647 3265 11/29/2024 $2,108.12
321648 2339 11/29/2024 $2,539.82
321649 3878 11/29/2024 $3,434.78
321650 1503 11/29/2024 $3,522.22
321651 2505 11/29/2024 $8,517.25
321652 3113 11/29/2024 $2,096.47
321653 3273 11/29/2024 $3,319.05
321654 1497 11/29/2024 $3,502.56
321655 3537 11/29/2024 $2,568.99
321656 2192 11/29/2024 $2,098.01
321657 3513 11/29/2024 $2,384.77
321658 3685 11/29/2024 $1,766.04
321659 2034 11/29/2024 $4,402.43
321660 3380 11/29/2024 $2,739.31
321661 3852 11/29/2024 $1,939.99
321662 3051 11/29/2024 $2,618.83
321663 1750 11/29/2024 $2,315.61
321664 2770 11/29/2024 $1,945.42
321665 2228 11/29/2024 $2,710.91
321666 3827 11/29/2024 $3,501.29
321667 3726 11/29/2024 $2,297.48
321668 3748 11/29/2024 $2,648.99
321669 3101 11/29/2024 $2,584.88
321670 3335 11/29/2024 $2,185.74
321671 3284 11/29/2024 $3,421.12
321672 3840 11/29/2024 $2,234.44
321673 3621 11/29/2024 $1,766.03
321674 2248 11/29/2024 $2,026.99
321675 3622 11/29/2024 $1,797.95
321676 1588 11/29/2024 $2,283.20
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 7 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321677 3788 11/29/2024 $1,978.56
321678 2189 11/29/2024 $3,696.66
321679 3560 11/29/2024 $1,879.96
321680 3509 11/29/2024 $2,241.14
321681 3226 11/29/2024 $2,236.05
321682 1121 11/29/2024 $3,059.15
321683 3149 11/29/2024 $3,040.54
321684 1865 11/29/2024 $3,062.89
321685 3479 11/29/2024 $2,292.89
321686 1723 11/29/2024 $2,404.88
321687 3296 11/29/2024 $3,111.89
321688 3707 11/29/2024 $1,934.46
321689 2531 11/29/2024 $3,836.40
321690 1513 11/29/2024 $2,032.59
321691 3283 11/29/2024 $3,361.48
321692 2118 11/29/2024 $1,668.18
321693 3387 11/29/2024 $1,792.49
321694 3330 11/29/2024 $2,530.90
321695 2681 11/29/2024 $3,816.65
321696 1612 11/29/2024 $2,077.26
321697 3610 11/29/2024 $2,309.05
321698 3277 11/29/2024 $2,470.79
321699 3287 11/29/2024 $2,075.45
321700 3037 11/29/2024 $2,571.84
321701 1449 11/29/2024 $3,190.50
321702 2677 11/29/2024 $5,650.16
321703 3688 11/29/2024 $1,866.20
321704 3341 11/29/2024 $2,513.51
321705 1137 11/29/2024 $2,978.11
321706 2383 11/29/2024 $2,104.13
321707 3687 11/29/2024 $1,688.93
321708 3130 11/29/2024 $3,053.17
321709 2489 11/29/2024 $2,328.32
321710 3733 11/29/2024 $1,464.63
321711 3624 11/29/2024 $2,186.24
321712 3139 11/29/2024 $1,718.14
321713 3099 11/29/2024 $2,514.56
321714 2696 11/29/2024 $1,781.61
321715 3536 11/29/2024 $3,019.81
321716 3722 11/29/2024 $1,834.25
321717 1254 11/29/2024 $2,115.40
321718 3187 11/29/2024 $2,114.50
321719 3804 11/29/2024 $2,822.78
321720 2368 11/29/2024 $2,413.98
321721 3100 11/29/2024 $3,148.45
321722 3796 11/29/2024 $2,126.66
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 8 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321723 1338 11/29/2024 $4,530.52
321724 2229 11/29/2024 $2,102.70
321725 1049 11/29/2024 $2,422.90
321726 3586 11/29/2024 $2,148.74
321727 1506 11/29/2024 $2,020.89
321728 3004 11/29/2024 $2,322.37
321729 1932 11/29/2024 $2,176.60
321730 3279 11/29/2024 $1,894.85
321731 2460 11/29/2024 $2,581.38
321732 3874 11/29/2024 $2,046.52
321733 3671 11/29/2024 $1,846.97
321734 2732 11/29/2024 $1,945.42
321735 3338 11/29/2024 $1,806.96
321736 2552 11/29/2024 $2,384.41
321737 2476 11/29/2024 $5,230.51
321738 2279 11/29/2024 $3,457.80
321739 3515 11/29/2024 $5,398.21
321740 3092 11/29/2024 $3,471.92
321741 3836 11/29/2024 $2,148.75
321742 3138 11/29/2024 $3,534.95
321743 3146 11/29/2024 $2,879.29
321744 2590 11/29/2024 $2,717.01
321745 2748 11/29/2024 $2,232.33
321746 3709 11/29/2024 $3,023.48
321747 2669 11/29/2024 $3,533.44
321748 2623 11/29/2024 $2,158.33
321749 2637 11/29/2024 $2,386.52
321750 2638 11/29/2024 $2,923.21
321751 3803 11/29/2024 $2,140.93
321752 3109 11/29/2024 $2,871.10
321753 2671 11/29/2024 $3,034.29
321754 2593 11/29/2024 $2,819.78
321755 3328 11/29/2024 $2,642.64
321756 3461 11/29/2024 $2,174.82
321757 2626 11/29/2024 $2,500.76
321758 3937 11/29/2024 $1,172.66
321759 3038 11/29/2024 $2,938.77
321760 3052 11/29/2024 $2,210.41
321761 2290 11/29/2024 $2,346.60
321762 3716 11/29/2024 $1,840.77
321763 3110 11/29/2024 $4,485.25
321764 2641 11/29/2024 $2,359.19
321765 2612 11/29/2024 $2,946.89
321766 3698 11/29/2024 $1,929.55
321767 2642 11/29/2024 $2,732.32
321768 3705 11/29/2024 $2,547.65
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 9 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321769 3331 11/29/2024 $2,023.39
321770 2674 11/29/2024 $2,687.03
321771 3231 11/29/2024 $2,434.52
321772 3228 11/29/2024 $3,114.60
321773 2628 11/29/2024 $2,729.94
321774 2630 11/29/2024 $3,075.06
321775 3182 11/29/2024 $2,949.45
321776 2599 11/29/2024 $2,572.55
321777 2683 11/29/2024 $3,426.42
321778 2753 11/29/2024 $2,644.35
321779 2610 11/29/2024 $2,875.41
321780 3323 11/29/2024 $2,391.39
321781 1389 11/29/2024 $2,810.13
321782 2808 11/29/2024 $2,113.76
321783 2646 11/29/2024 $3,288.12
321784 3617 11/29/2024 $2,055.45
321785 2524 11/29/2024 $3,028.39
321786 2686 11/29/2024 $2,195.94
321787 2193 11/29/2024 $2,717.09
321788 3322 11/29/2024 $2,880.33
321789 3629 11/29/2024 $2,569.67
321790 3230 11/29/2024 $3,483.95
321791 2038 11/29/2024 $2,350.35
321792 2678 11/29/2024 $4,207.92
321793 3240 11/29/2024 $2,565.08
321794 3743 11/29/2024 $2,095.78
321795 3215 11/29/2024 $3,021.97
321796 3140 11/29/2024 $3,188.69
321797 3035 11/29/2024 $2,333.23
321798 3907 11/29/2024 $15.94
321799 3651 11/29/2024 $2,335.07
321800 3769 11/29/2024 $521.84
321801 3299 11/29/2024 $2,301.58
321802 3765 11/29/2024 $338.60
321803 1853 11/29/2024 $2,915.70
321804 3729 11/29/2024 $2,002.62
321805 2343 11/29/2024 $1,692.11
321806 3821 11/29/2024 $1,078.74
321807 3497 11/29/2024 $3,549.19
321808 3503 11/29/2024 $3,070.68
321809 3105 11/29/2024 $2,065.76
321810 3579 11/29/2024 $1,011.55
321811 3386 11/29/2024 $2,603.78
321812 3925 11/29/2024 $1,352.66
321813 3792 11/29/2024 $910.28
321814 3191 11/29/2024 $2,818.96
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 10 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321815 3931 11/29/2024 $1,977.53
321816 3922 11/29/2024 $1,688.94
321817 2488 11/29/2024 $1,158.45
321818 3496 11/29/2024 $1,209.46
321819 3120 11/29/2024 $1,038.83
321820 3778 11/29/2024 $235.03
321821 3482 11/29/2024 $2,153.00
321822 3611 11/29/2024 $1,366.28
321823 3724 11/29/2024 $853.42
321824 3011 11/29/2024 $2,083.35
321825 3768 11/29/2024 $290.80
321826 3580 11/29/2024 $1,784.24
321827 3905 11/29/2024 $15.94
321828 3873 11/29/2024 $2,194.85
321829 3270 11/29/2024 $2,012.05
321830 3263 11/29/2024 $1,969.58
321831 3795 11/29/2024 $1,325.22
321832 3252 11/29/2024 $2,791.25
321833 3295 11/29/2024 $2,262.60
321834 3257 11/29/2024 $2,308.37
321835 3184 11/29/2024 $3,949.75
321836 3927 11/29/2024 $1,372.94
321837 3070 11/29/2024 $2,492.09
321838 3657 11/29/2024 $646.62
321839 3902 11/29/2024 $67.72
321840 3689 11/29/2024 $2,066.78
321841 3288 11/29/2024 $1,752.28
321842 3767 11/29/2024 $306.73
321843 1866 11/29/2024 $2,954.40
321844 3774 11/29/2024 $15.94
321845 3791 11/29/2024 $1,283.27
321846 3572 11/29/2024 $1,321.14
321847 3664 11/29/2024 $794.55
321848 3936 11/29/2024 $554.87
321849 3772 11/29/2024 $175.27
321850 3766 11/29/2024 $418.27
321851 3918 11/29/2024 $855.17
321852 3822 11/29/2024 $1,215.10
321853 1282 11/29/2024 $2,408.84
321854 3481 11/29/2024 $2,020.02
321855 2379 11/29/2024 $3,216.84
321856 3655 11/29/2024 $872.50
321857 3813 11/29/2024 $853.44
321858 3656 11/29/2024 $919.17
321859 3789 11/29/2024 $4,349.11
321860 3793 11/29/2024 $1,215.10
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 11 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321861 3903 11/29/2024 $235.03
321862 3775 11/29/2024 $366.47
321863 2478 11/29/2024 $1,138.22
321864 3919 11/29/2024 $856.70
321865 3882 11/29/2024 $1,215.10
321866 1287 11/29/2024 $3,086.74
321867 3929 11/29/2024 $1,228.73
321868 3904 11/29/2024 $15.94
321869 3727 11/29/2024 $2,568.53
321870 3667 11/29/2024 $175.27
321871 2711 11/29/2024 $2,216.75
321872 3900 11/29/2024 $175.27
321873 3798 11/29/2024 $1,002.28
321874 3258 11/29/2024 $1,852.25
321875 3259 11/29/2024 $2,172.50
321876 3573 11/29/2024 $1,847.95
321877 3507 11/29/2024 $2,580.74
321878 3790 11/29/2024 $1,029.61
321879 3906 11/29/2024 $15.94
321880 3531 11/29/2024 $3,499.02
321881 3897 11/29/2024 $15.94
321882 3814 11/29/2024 $1,045.40
321883 3665 11/29/2024 $15.94
321884 3639 11/29/2024 $1,711.75
321885 3895 11/29/2024 $207.14
321886 3587 11/29/2024 $981.80
321887 3901 11/29/2024 $143.41
321888 3669 11/29/2024 $458.93
321889 3029 11/29/2024 $2,426.60
321890 3190 11/29/2024 $3,233.30
321891 1959 11/29/2024 $3,881.90
321892 3250 11/29/2024 $1,798.79
321893 3824 11/29/2024 $1,215.10
321894 3812 11/29/2024 $851.81
321895 3609 11/29/2024 $1,158.68
321896 3770 11/29/2024 $414.27
321897 3794 11/29/2024 $1,215.10
321898 3492 11/29/2024 $15.94
321899 3691 11/29/2024 $868.92
321900 3866 11/29/2024 $1,336.31
321901 3910 11/29/2024 $550.06
321902 3725 11/29/2024 $1,252.60
321903 3576 11/29/2024 $1,217.26
321904 3647 11/29/2024 $55.77
321905 3566 11/29/2024 $731.64
321906 3777 11/29/2024 $87.63
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 12 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321907 3511 11/29/2024 $2,192.49
321908 3823 11/29/2024 $1,208.28
321909 3368 11/29/2024 $2,161.67
321910 2006 11/29/2024 $3,680.07
321911 3761 11/29/2024 $2,940.47
321912 2684 11/29/2024 $2,503.64
321913 3923 11/29/2024 $2,096.47
321914 3079 11/29/2024 $2,144.66
321915 1966 11/29/2024 $3,601.27
321916 3844 11/29/2024 $2,307.87
321917 3388 11/29/2024 $2,480.94
321918 2355 11/29/2024 $2,751.82
321919 3696 11/29/2024 $2,746.70
321920 3500 11/29/2024 $3,986.98
321921 3620 11/29/2024 $1,873.05
321922 3654 11/29/2024 $1,807.50
321923 2039 11/29/2024 $1,945.42
321924 3838 11/29/2024 $2,148.75
321925 3281 11/29/2024 $2,530.13
321926 3550 11/29/2024 $2,786.61
321927 3348 11/29/2024 $1,874.97
321928 3862 11/29/2024 $1,554.17
321929 3807 11/29/2024 $2,163.61
321930 3081 11/29/2024 $2,120.73
321931 3523 11/29/2024 $5,440.66
321932 3271 11/29/2024 $2,020.10
321933 3017 11/29/2024 $5,733.45
321934 3883 11/29/2024 $1,749.42
321935 3512 11/29/2024 $2,959.26
321936 2027 11/29/2024 $2,401.00
321937 2330 11/29/2024 $3,118.79
321938 2795 11/29/2024 $1,169.63
321939 3888 11/29/2024 $1,916.79
321940 3437 11/29/2024 $5,875.41
321941 3421 11/29/2024 $6,166.81
321942 3439 11/29/2024 $3,281.29
321943 3440 11/29/2024 $4,795.70
321944 3441 11/29/2024 $5,569.82
321945 3473 11/29/2024 $5,230.89
321946 3820 11/29/2024 $3,270.50
321947 3406 11/29/2024 $5,022.09
321948 3422 11/29/2024 $6,969.41
321949 3442 11/29/2024 $3,324.16
321950 3433 11/29/2024 $5,122.60
321951 3424 11/29/2024 $6,634.02
321952 3414 11/29/2024 $6,307.66
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 13 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321953 3704 11/29/2024 $9,749.06
321954 3734 11/29/2024 $5,325.62
321955 3832 11/29/2024 $3,252.31
321956 3799 11/29/2024 $3,752.26
321957 3886 11/29/2024 $4,472.45
321958 3443 11/29/2024 $4,449.68
321959 3600 11/29/2024 $5,058.70
321960 3711 11/29/2024 $6,540.67
321961 3928 11/29/2024 $3,845.03
321962 3715 11/29/2024 $3,591.62
321963 3444 11/29/2024 $4,920.78
321964 3583 11/29/2024 $10,845.72
321965 3594 11/29/2024 $5,525.26
321966 3935 11/29/2024 $3,746.16
321967 3409 11/29/2024 $4,839.04
321968 3856 11/29/2024 $6,482.43
321969 3426 11/29/2024 $4,058.93
321970 3860 11/29/2024 $3,450.89
321971 3642 11/29/2024 $3,596.06
321972 3584 11/29/2024 $5,713.44
321973 3538 11/29/2024 $2,234.44
321974 3410 11/29/2024 $10,076.44
321975 3828 11/29/2024 $4,032.91
321976 3447 11/29/2024 $5,808.24
321977 3427 11/29/2024 $4,840.60
321978 3411 11/29/2024 $6,636.37
321979 3448 11/29/2024 $4,320.02
321980 3833 11/29/2024 $3,581.98
321981 3518 11/29/2024 $2,148.75
321982 3449 11/29/2024 $6,938.89
321983 3428 11/29/2024 $3,942.75
321984 3858 11/29/2024 $2,043.51
321985 3429 11/29/2024 $3,206.32
321986 3451 11/29/2024 $7,264.32
321987 3595 11/29/2024 $6,526.98
321988 3430 11/29/2024 $4,551.39
321989 3452 11/29/2024 $5,318.72
321990 3417 11/29/2024 $3,086.99
321991 3085 11/29/2024 $2,272.14
321992 3431 11/29/2024 $4,344.79
321993 3242 11/29/2024 $3,458.29
321994 3857 11/29/2024 $2,243.54
321995 3419 11/29/2024 $6,339.29
321996 3524 11/29/2024 $4,196.51
321997 3412 11/29/2024 $5,072.02
321998 3829 11/29/2024 $5,915.49
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 14 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
321999 3420 11/29/2024 $4,109.57
322000 3921 11/29/2024 $5,661.23
322001 3435 11/29/2024 $6,130.69
322002 3800 11/29/2024 $4,104.64
322003 3432 11/29/2024 $3,951.96
322004 3408 11/29/2024 $5,613.41
322005 3456 11/29/2024 $5,683.90
322006 3859 11/29/2024 $3,259.07
322007 3763 11/29/2024 $3,144.88
322008 3591 11/29/2024 $5,831.95
322009 3392 11/29/2024 $5,831.06
322010 3855 11/29/2024 $3,239.23
322011 3831 11/29/2024 $4,427.27
322012 3434 11/29/2024 $2,905.44
Advices Total 1,564,078.16
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 15 of 16 11/29/2024 Check Date Total Gross
IRS 11/15/2024 $5.70
IRS 11/29/2024 $275,374.48
State Taxes 11/29/2024 $81,926.84
CASDU 11/29/2024 $3,882.63
Deferred Comp (457) 11/18/2024 $14.77
Deferred Comp (457) 12/02/2024 $15,901.16
PERS 12/02/2024 $373,769.38
Electronic Vendor Payments Total 750,874.96
Vendor
Electronic Vendor Payments
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 16 of 16 11/29/2024 Item Number: 13
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Subject:
City Council Members’ Proof of Residency
Recommendation:
That the City Council receive the proof of residency information as provided herein.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Discussion:
City Council Policy and Procedure Manual, Chapter 2, Section IV A states, A. Annual Review of Residency
“Government Code Section 36502(a) requires Councilmembers of this City to maintain a legal residence or domicile within the City of Victorville and rules regarding this are further discussed in Section 243 and 244 of the Government Code. To properly ensure compliance, Councilmembers shall be required to certify with the City Clerk annually, their residency or domicile within the City of Victorville. To be considered certified, each proof of residency as described below must contain the house number (and apartment number if applicable) and street name of the residency or domicile in an unredacted state.
Councilmembers are required to live in the District they represent and are required to live in the City of Victorville during their entire term in office. To ensure that the Councilmembers continue to live in the area they represent, each elected official must submit one of the following documents to the City Clerk during the first 31 calendar days of the year (January 1st to 31st) and 3 0
7 7
within 30 days of any change in residency. Acceptable forms for proof of residency are as follows:
1. Home Ownership. Proof as follows:
(a)a copy of a title deed or grant deed, a mortgage payment billing statement verifying the address, or any other document that can verify home ownership and residency of the property, or (b)evidence of a homeowner's property tax exemption filed with the County of San Bernardino Assessor for proof that the home is his or her primary residence. If the elected official does not have a tax exemption on file, he or she must submit an affidavit signed by the elected official verifying that the home is the primary residence; or
(c)If the home ownership is in the name of a person other than the elected official, or in the name of a legal entity, such as a trust, partnership or corporation, the elected official must submit an affidavit signed by the homeowner or authorized legal representative of the entity verifying that the elected official is living in the home as his or her primary residence.
2. Rented or Leased Property. Proof as follows:
(a)If the residence is rented or leased by the elected official, the elected official will provide proof of residency by submitting a signed copy of a current and legally enforceable lease or rental agreement that demonstrates the elected official resides at the specified address; or
(b)If an elected official is living at a residence without a lease/rental agreement, the elected official must have the landlord or property owner sign an affidavit verifying, under penalty of perjury, the elected official's residency in the landlord or owner's property.
3. Current Motor Vehicle Registration or California Driver’s License. Proof 3 0
7 7
as follows:
(a)Motor vehicle registration showing it is registered to the elected official for the residence claimed, or
(b)a valid California driver's license showing that the address on his or her license matches the residence claimed.
If the residence address on either the driver's license or auto registration is in the process of being changed, the elected official must provide a document from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (Form DMC14) verifying the change is in fact in process. If the elected official does not own an automobile or does not have a California driver's license, the elected official must submit any other State-of- California-issued identification showing that the address on the identification document is consistent with the address shown on his or her current voter registration.
4. Current Utility Bill. Proof as follows:
(a)The utility bill must be in the elected member's name and show that the service address is within the Councilmember’s
respective District. In the event a utility bill has yet to be generated, a letter from an authorized representative of the utility provider stating that an account has been opened in the elected official's name will suffice. If there is an agreement with a landlord or other legal entity, as verified by a rental contract or lease contract, that states the landlord or other legal entity will pay the utility bill, the elected official must submit an affidavit signed by the landlord or other legal entity's authorized representative, attesting to that fact.
5. Other Documents. Proof as follows:
(a)School records or any official document issued by an accredited educational institution, sealed by the school, or (b)current paycheck stub or personnel record issued by the elected official's employer, or
3 0
7 7
(c)current homeowner or renter insurance policy, or
(d)current documents issued by any California court or a federal court that lists the name of the elected official and his or her residence address, or
(e)Original record issued by any state or national bank, state or federal savings association, trust company, industrial loan company, state or federal credit union, or any institution or entity that has issued a credit card.
In addition to 5 (a)-(e) above, the elected official must sign an affidavit attesting, under penalty of perjury, his or her current place of residence.
In the event a Councilmember moves to a new residence within the District after filing any previous affidavit, the elected official must confirm the new address within 30 days of moving by providing one of the documents listed in items 1 through 5 and an affidavit to the City Clerk.
Incumbent Councilmembers who have not relocated since the information required by this Section was last provided may comply with this Section by supplying a copy of a current driver's license or State- of-California-issued identification card and an affidavit attesting, under penalty of perjury, that they have not relocated and that all previously submitted information remains true and correct. The City Clerk shall confirm that the residence address on the incumbent’s voter registration is consistent with previous documents submitted in order to demonstrate the residence address is within the boundaries of the District in which the Councilmember was elected or appointed to office.
Failure to provide any of the above-required documents on or before January 31st of each year and/or within 30 days of moving to a new residence shall be referred to the City Council for further action and could result in his or her office becoming vacant in accordance with Government Code Section 36502, and the City Council could take an action to remove said Councilmember.
Government Code Section 36502(a) provides:
3 0
7 7
“A person is not eligible to hold office as councilmember … unless he or she is at the time of assuming the office an elector of the city, and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate.… If, during his or her term of office, he or she moves his or her place of residence outside of the city limits or ceases to be an elector of the city, his or her office shall immediately become vacant.” Alternatively, for non-compliance with this Section, the Council may consider taking action to remove the Councilmember from committee assignments and access to public facilities outside of normal working hours and/or initiate an investigation to determine the Councilmember’s place of residence.
In order to ensure compliance with these requirements, City staff shall provide an update as to compliance in February of each year as part of a February consent calendar item.”
The City Clerk reached out to Council Members on January 8, 2025, regarding the annual review of residency requirement. To date, the following documents have been provided.
Council Member Documents Provided District
Mayor Becerra California Drivers License 3
Mayor Pro Tem
Harriman
Property Tax Bill 4
Council Member Gaudin Lease Agreement 1
Council Member Irving Utility Bill 5
Council Member Jones Motor Vehicle Registration 2
Staff remains available for any questions or comments you might have.
Attachments: None
Item Number: 14
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
C. Eric Ray, Airport Director
Subject:
Notice of Completion for Building 686 Roof Replacement Project #CC24-013 Recommendation:
That the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Board of Directors:
(1) Approve the Notice of Completion for Building 686 Roof Replacement, Project #CC24-013; and
(2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the Notice of Completion.
Fiscal Impact:
This action will result in a fiscal impact of $29,649.85. A retention of five percent was withheld from each pay estimate during construction as per the Construction Agreement.
Upon Board approval of the Notice of Completion (“NOC”), the retention of $29,649.85 will be released thirty-five days after the NOC is recorded. Retention funds are available as follows:
Funding Source Budget FY 2024-2025
450-20110-95122 BLDG 686 Retention $29,649.85
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal E. Invest in Infrastructure: The Project provided a long-term roofing solution to a building that will become a revenue generating asset for the Airport.
Background:
The original roof base atop Building 686 was installed in 1959 and was comprised of three different roof levels. It was apparent that since its construction, the US Air Force modified Building 686 and the roof to suit its needs and the modifications left multiple obsolete protrusions that obstructed drainage. The large temperature variations common to the 5 9
3 Mojave Desert caused further issues as the metal roofs expanded and contracted with the weather. The continued expansion and contraction of the metal roofs over nearly 64 years caused small gaps to develop between the metal roof and the roofing screws that allowed rainwater and wind-blown dust to intrude into the buildings. It was apparent that additional roofing layers had been installed since 1959, which had also long since exceeded their intended life expectancy.
The enormity of existing square footage of dilapidated roofing on Building 686 made piecemeal repairs by SCLA staff impractical. Staff determined that the best option for the renewal of this roof was full-scale rehabilitation.
Discussion:
One portion of the Project involved the removal of approximately 28,500 square feet of deteriorated roofing solutions. Following the removal of the built-up roof layers and obsolete protrusions, the roof deck was cleaned, inspected, repaired where necessary, primed, coated with a minimum of 3 inches of Spray Polyurethane Foam (“SPF”), and sealed with three layers of elastomeric coating.
The other main portion of the Project required approximately 27,000 square feet of existing gable metal roof decking to be cleaned, inspected, and repaired where necessary. Multiple roof protrusions were removed and the subsequent holes patched to match the existing roof deck. The metal roof deck was primed, coated with a polyurethane material, and covered with three layers of elastomeric coating.
Building 686 is being rehabilitated to become a revenue generating asset. The interior space of this building needs to be clean and dry to protect the sensitive aviation equipment that will be stored in this building. The seamless nature of SPF and modern roof coating systems does not allow water, ice, or dust to intrude into tiny crevices in the roof.
On February 04, 2025, the Project was substantially completed and inspected to the satisfaction of staff, with final documentation submitted by Universal the following day.
The Project was completed on below budget for a total cost of $592,997.
Therefore, staff recommends that Your Honorable Board of Directors approve the issuance of the Notice of Completion for the Building 686 Roof Replacement Project #CC24-013 and authorize its execution by the Executive Director. Upon execution, the NOC will be filed with the San Bernardino County Recorder’s office to offer an opportunity for sub-contractors to make a claim for any work performed that remains unpaid. Thirty- five days after the NOC filing, should no claims be made, the SCLAA will release the retention currently held and owed to Universal Coatings, Inc. in the amount of $29,649.85.
Staff remains available for any questions or comments you may have.
CER/see
5 9
3 Attachments: A. Site Map
B. Notice of Completion
C. Construction Photos
ATTACHMENT A
SITE MAP
ATTACHMENT B
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
SISCO ELEKANA FOR CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
NAME CITY OF VICTORVILLE
STREET ATTN: CITY CLERK
ADDRESS P.O. BOX 5001
CITY, STATE & VICTORVILLE CA 92392-5001
ZIP CODE
Recording of this document is fee-exempt under Government Code Section SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY 6103. No Documentary Transfer Tax is due on the document pursuant to Revenue Taxation code Section 11922.
APN# 0459-194-21 NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
The undersigned is OWNER or AGENT OF THE OWNER of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.
The full NAME of the OWNER is SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT The ADDRESS of the OWNER is 18374 PHANTOM WEST, VICTORVILLE, CA 92394 The NATURE OF THE INTEREST or estate of the undersigned is FEE (e.g. fee, leasehold, joint tenancy, vendee under a contract of purchase, etc.) The full name(s) and address(es) of all persons, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:
Name Address
NONE NONE
The full name(s) and address(es) of the successor(s) in interest of the undersigned if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to:
Name Address
NONE NONE
A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED on FEBRUARY 4, 2025 ______ The work of improvement completed is described as BUILDING 686 ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT CC24-013 The name of the original contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was:
UNIVERSAL COATINGS INC.
The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of VICTORVILLE County of SAN BERNADINO , State of California, and is DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BUILDING 686 ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT CC24-013 APN# 0459-194-21-0000 The street address of said property is 12985 AEROSPACE DRIVE, VICTORVILLE, CA, 92394 (if applicable)
Dated:
Keith C. Metzler, Executive Director, Southern California Logistics Airport Authority
I, KEITH C. METZLER am the EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
(Name of below signor) (Owner, President, Authorized Agent, Partner, etc.) the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
VICTORVILLE
(Date and Place) Keith C. Metzler, Executive Director, Southern California Logistics Airport Authority
ATTACHMENT C
CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS
BEFORE
AFTER
BEFORE
AFTER
BEFORE
AFTER
Item Number: 15
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 in the amount of $8,143,841.17, covering Electronic Fund Transfers No. 342691 through 342947 and Warrant No. 798327 through 798515 for 01/23/2025 through 02/05/2025, per the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 for the period covering July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025.
Fiscal Impact:
The total fiscal impact for FY24-25 in the amount of $8,143,841.17 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the total funds paid to vendors.
Background:
Pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code (2.24.080) the attached demands were presented by the departments, audited by the Finance Department and subsequent warrants/wire transfers were issued. All were found to be in conformity to City policies and procedures and funds were budgeted or available to pay said demands. A list of commercial warrants and wire transfers is now being presented to Council for approval.
Attachments: A. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 Check Register Summary
ATTACHMENT A:
Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 Check Register Summary
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 1User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
342691 01/29/2025 EFT 016204 4LEAF, INC. 9,815.40
342692 01/29/2025 EFT 010537 ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, 6,407.00 342693 01/29/2025 EFT 006716 AIRGAS USA, LLC 215.37
342694 01/29/2025 EFT 018562 BEST POWER EQUIPMENT, LLC 439.49 342695 01/29/2025 EFT 000205 ATLAS COPCO USA HOLDINGS 5,450.00 342696 01/29/2025 EFT 010862 BABB, JORDAN 300.00
342697 01/29/2025 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 31,019.02
342698 01/29/2025 EFT 010986 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNN 3,425.05 342699 01/29/2025 EFT 014954 BRIDGEPAY NETWORK SOLUTIO 2,375.40 342700 01/29/2025 EFT 021414 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS 638.00 342701 01/29/2025 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 1,725.83 342702 01/29/2025 EFT 022571 GREGORY P. BURGARD 8,658.78 342703 01/29/2025 EFT 016230 CAVANAUGH & ASSOCIATES, P 4,000.00 342704 01/29/2025 EFT 016335 CHARTER COMMUNICATION HOL 2,375.00 342705 01/29/2025 EFT 018132 CLINICAL LABORATORY OF SA 5,698.75 342706 01/29/2025 EFT 027067 COMPASS PEST MANAGEMENT I 122.00 342707 01/29/2025 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 872.15 342708 01/29/2025 EFT 000657 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 2,700.00 342709 01/29/2025 EFT 000743 DELL MARKETING L.P. 16,810.04 342710 01/29/2025 EFT 010282 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE CO 4,186.62 342711 01/29/2025 EFT 009492 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNI 33,745.40 342712 01/29/2025 EFT 022345 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SER 497.30 342713 01/29/2025 EFT 019199 DLT SOLUTIONS, LLC 17,807.20 342714 01/29/2025 EFT 005295 DOKKEN ENGINEERING 6,725.96 342715 01/29/2025 EFT 000826 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION 1,024.47 342716 01/29/2025 EFT 018364 HILL, JUSTIN 5,764.32
342717 01/29/2025 EFT 015760 FASTENAL COMPANY 1,245.51
342718 01/29/2025 EFT 020330 FENAGH, LLC 25,042.50
342719 01/29/2025 EFT 017560 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 355.99 342720 01/29/2025 EFT 016767 KALMIKOV ENTERPRISES, INC 2,386.78 342721 01/29/2025 EFT 011206 FLYERS ENERGY LLC 2,979.12 342722 01/29/2025 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 408.18 342723 01/29/2025 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 1,079.04 342724 01/29/2025 EFT 018175 GENERAL PUMP COMPANY, INC 1,480.00 342725 01/29/2025 EFT 003047 GRAVES & KING LLP 2,443.50 342726 01/29/2025 EFT 006269 GREEN, DE BORTNOWSKY, LLP 61,240.81 342727 01/29/2025 EFT 007552 PELAYO, ANTHONY 950.00
342728 01/29/2025 EFT 023053 SPARKS, STEPHANIE VICTORI 256.00 342729 01/29/2025 EFT 001104 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 3,449.57 342730 01/29/2025 EFT 020948 HARPER, JAMES JR 450.00
342731 01/29/2025 EFT 017752 HATTRIX INC. 618.79
342732 01/29/2025 EFT 000278 HI DESERT ALARM 878.08
342733 01/29/2025 EFT 022905 HOPE THE MISSION 542,264.53 342734 01/29/2025 EFT 021594 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 5,652.15 342735 01/29/2025 EFT 024922 INFOSEND, INC 40,029.36
342736 01/29/2025 EFT 001282 INLAND KENWORTH, INC. 63.75 342737 01/29/2025 EFT 001059 JOE A. GONSALVES & SON 3,200.00 342738 01/29/2025 EFT 019953 KEITH, PHILLIP 598.50
342739 01/29/2025 EFT 022659 LIGHTNING STEP TECHNOLOGI 50.00 342740 01/29/2025 EFT 011919 MARTINEZ, BASILIO 150.95
342741 01/29/2025 EFT 001548 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 33.89 342742 01/29/2025 EFT 005674 MERRELL JOHNSON ENGINEERI 1,284.00
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 2User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
342743 01/29/2025 EFT 019967 MOJAVE AUTO COLLISION 11,532.44 342744 01/29/2025 EFT 001599 MOJAVE DESERT AQMD 3,366.30 342745 01/29/2025 EFT 018223 NEW RESOURCES GROUP, INC. 469.26 342746 01/29/2025 EFT 009644 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY I 527.22 342747 01/29/2025 EFT 001789 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC. 2,834.97 342748 01/29/2025 EFT 013165 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE 1,815.91 342749 01/29/2025 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 963.26 342750 01/29/2025 EFT 019063 QUADIENT, INC. 1,184.97
342751 01/29/2025 EFT 018666 RETROTEL, INC. 3,806.25
342752 01/29/2025 EFT 020842 ALL PURPOSE FIRE EXT. COR 66.66 342753 01/29/2025 EFT 002063 SBC FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,860.00 342754 01/29/2025 EFT 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 566,450.96 342755 01/29/2025 EFT 007551 SNORKEL INTERNATIONAL, LL 654.54 342757 01/29/2025 EFT 018368 TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING, 5,504.00 342759 01/29/2025 EFT 019341 MARTIN, ARMANDO JR. 2,000.00 342760 01/29/2025 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 612.56 342761 01/29/2025 EFT 020762 OREMOR OF VICTORVILLE, LL 512.57 342762 01/29/2025 EFT 008430 CALMAT COMPANY 1,514.77
342763 01/29/2025 EFT 002498 VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER 1,181,383.28 342764 01/29/2025 EFT 002554 WAXIE'S ENTERPRISES, LLC, 10,562.47 342765 01/29/2025 EFT 018301 WESTERN WATER WORKS SUPPL 3,773.20 342766 01/29/2025 EFT 009637 WSP USA, INC. 1,187.94
342767 01/29/2025 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 75,990.99
342768 01/29/2025 EFT 005004 ABREGO, RODOLFO RUDY 152.40 342769 01/29/2025 EFT 014212 ALDERETE, EVONIA 513.60
342770 01/29/2025 EFT 011930 ANDERSON, PAMELA K 500.14
342771 01/29/2025 EFT 004157 ARMSTRONG, DANA 702.44
342772 01/29/2025 EFT 019717 ARROYO, JOANN 315.72
342773 01/29/2025 EFT 004941 BATES, CAROLEE 634.39
342774 01/29/2025 EFT 003638 BECERRA, ELIZABETH 700.88
342775 01/29/2025 EFT 012054 BECKER, JOHN R 354.29
342776 01/29/2025 EFT 014654 BEVILACQUA, ANTHONY 371.15 342777 01/29/2025 EFT 011916 BIER, MICHAEL 479.79
342778 01/29/2025 EFT 018689 BORROWMAN, STEVEN H. 825.46 342779 01/29/2025 EFT 012066 BROWN, MARTY R 513.60
342780 01/29/2025 EFT 012044 BURCHAK, GLORIA J 474.95
342781 01/29/2025 EFT 012056 CALDWELL, TERRY E 354.29
342782 01/29/2025 EFT 001114 CAMELI-STEVENS, LORAINE 162.03 342783 01/29/2025 EFT 003218 CARBAJAL, STEVEN 217.97
342784 01/29/2025 EFT 025314 CASTRO, MELISSA 855.42
342785 01/29/2025 EFT 003645 CATHCART, MICHAEL 598.07
342786 01/29/2025 EFT 004144 CHRISTIAN-SOPER, BARBARA 550.26 342787 01/29/2025 EFT 004751 COCKRUM, DAVID J. 392.16
342788 01/29/2025 EFT 008111 COLLINS, KEVIN 580.01
342789 01/29/2025 EFT 011935 COSTELLO, JOSE 111.85
342790 01/29/2025 EFT 011934 COX, JAMES L 439.24
342791 01/29/2025 EFT 012051 COX, JOHN STEVEN 76.26
342792 01/29/2025 EFT 012064 COY, MICHAEL 208.12
342793 01/29/2025 EFT 012069 DEZWART, AMY LYN 474.95
342794 01/29/2025 EFT 006095 DIAZ, JANET 554.56
342795 01/29/2025 EFT 019734 DORAN, WILLIAM J. III 153.04 342796 01/29/2025 EFT 009544 FALZONE, RICHARD 269.17
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 3User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
342797 01/29/2025 EFT 012046 FITZSIMMONS, RALPH L 75.08 342798 01/29/2025 EFT 004773 FLORES, JOSEPH P. 148.99
342799 01/29/2025 EFT 014881 GARCIA, ERNIE 589.98
342800 01/29/2025 EFT 011940 GARCIA, VINCENT J 703.37
342801 01/29/2025 EFT 011909 GARLAND, SHEILA D 296.79
342802 01/29/2025 EFT 012063 HARBOUR, RAYMOND LEE 852.46 342803 01/29/2025 EFT 015665 HELDRETH, GREGORY 878.90
342804 01/29/2025 EFT 012052 HINOJOS, JANICE A 371.15
342805 01/29/2025 EFT 011677 HOLLAND, KELLEY 317.80
342806 01/29/2025 EFT 011385 JAMES, CHRISTINA 569.96
342807 01/29/2025 EFT 012050 JARRETT, JENNIE L 474.95
342808 01/29/2025 EFT 022215 KARRES, RONALD J. 378.70
342809 01/29/2025 EFT 012049 KUHLMANN, EULEMA 150.03
342810 01/29/2025 EFT 029000 LACEY, MICHAEL P. 64.12
342811 01/29/2025 EFT 014183 LAURIE, BERNEE 206.58
342812 01/29/2025 EFT 012061 LAWSON, JAMES 743.92
342813 01/29/2025 EFT 012047 LEEF, DAVID 354.29
342814 01/29/2025 EFT 009048 LUDWIG, TRACY 610.33
342815 01/29/2025 EFT 019051 LUTHER, KARLA 268.78
342816 01/29/2025 EFT 012060 MADDOX, JONNIE F 513.60
342817 01/29/2025 EFT 019440 MCCORMICK, DONNA 841.96
342818 01/29/2025 EFT 014184 MCGINN, JOHN 845.78
342819 01/29/2025 EFT 011918 MCGLADE, JOHN A 217.87
342820 01/29/2025 EFT 004588 MCGOWAN, CHERYL 271.98
342821 01/29/2025 EFT 003603 MCMURTRY, DANIEL 794.92
342822 01/29/2025 EFT 011913 MILLENDER, FRANCENE J 623.79 342823 01/29/2025 EFT 004745 MILLER, BRUCE 46.43
342824 01/29/2025 EFT 011917 MORSE, RENEE 500.14
342825 01/29/2025 EFT 012070 MOSHER, ADELE 146.89
342826 01/29/2025 EFT 012426 MULLINS, DENNIS M. 346.97
342827 01/29/2025 EFT 012065 NEWELL, CAROLYN 852.46
342828 01/29/2025 EFT 003200 O'DELL, DARRELL 686.47
342829 01/29/2025 EFT 013672 OGILVIE-HARPER, MARQUITA 312.06 342830 01/29/2025 EFT 012697 OROS, DWAYNE E. 855.42
342831 01/29/2025 EFT 012057 PATTERSON, ADAIR MARIE 500.14 342832 01/29/2025 EFT 022185 PIEPER, WADE 643.30
342833 01/29/2025 EFT 020717 PRUEITT, CORINNE 843.33
342834 01/29/2025 EFT 020716 PRUEITT, DAVID 843.33
342835 01/29/2025 EFT 011910 RAMIREZ, DIANA M 102.56
342836 01/29/2025 EFT 018894 RANDALL, DAVID L. 112.67
342837 01/29/2025 EFT 011920 RANKIN, SHARON 296.79
342838 01/29/2025 EFT 013209 RANKIN, TIMOTHY 804.54
342839 01/29/2025 EFT 020907 RODRIGUEZ, ANGELA 331.66
342840 01/29/2025 EFT 014496 RODRIGUEZ, LOUIE 794.92
342841 01/29/2025 EFT 017345 RUSSO, MARILEE 390.44
342842 01/29/2025 EFT 003583 RUSSO, VINCE 186.23
342843 01/29/2025 EFT 014493 SALAS, GLENN 282.64
342844 01/29/2025 EFT 012045 SALBERG, RAYMOND A 343.25
342845 01/29/2025 EFT 011929 SALINAS SR., XAVIER S 296.79 342846 01/29/2025 EFT 017488 SCHROEDER, KAY D. 439.24
342847 01/29/2025 EFT 003965 SCOTT, KIMBERLIE 392.16
342848 01/29/2025 EFT 014082 SMITH, ARNOLD 100.44
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 4User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
342849 01/29/2025 EFT 011931 SONGER FAMILY SURVIVAL TR 513.60 342850 01/29/2025 EFT 024654 SPARKS, DAVID J. 720.94
342851 01/29/2025 EFT 005559 ST. LOUIS, LINDA 878.90
342852 01/29/2025 EFT 018887 STONESIFER, ROBERT 150.03
342853 01/29/2025 EFT 021852 STONESIFER, BARRY 271.98
342854 01/29/2025 EFT 012949 STRATTON, DANIEL 186.21
342855 01/29/2025 EFT 017251 SWAL, JOSEPH F. 211.10
342856 01/29/2025 EFT 017153 SZARZYNSKI, MICHAEL J. 475.90 342857 01/29/2025 EFT 021025 TAYLOR, SHARON 323.17
342858 01/29/2025 EFT 012078 THOMASSON, PHILLIP 588.62
342859 01/29/2025 EFT 014806 WASSERMAN, REBECCA A 112.67 342860 01/29/2025 EFT 019160 WEAVER, STUART 855.42
342861 01/29/2025 EFT 013671 WEBB, WILLIAM C 349.89
342862 01/29/2025 EFT 011915 WHITE, JAMES M 513.60
342863 01/29/2025 EFT 011924 WILSON, BOBBY G 337.34
342864 01/29/2025 EFT 012958 WOLTERS, MARCELLA 27.04
342865 01/29/2025 EFT 012059 ZIZZI, WARREN J 719.59
342866 02/05/2025 EFT 021302 AAA CONTAINER SALES AND R 174.00 342867 02/05/2025 EFT 021759 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEM, 368.94 342868 02/05/2025 EFT 000104 DANTIN ENTERPRISES, INC. 1,225.00 342869 02/05/2025 EFT 000144 AMERICAN GREEN DEVELOPERS 11,600.00 342870 02/05/2025 EFT 002921 AMERICAN LANDSCAPE AND MA 48,639.53 342871 02/05/2025 EFT 022271 ASHTON, STEVE 923.56
342872 02/05/2025 EFT 019580 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 17,000.00 342873 02/05/2025 EFT 000205 ATLAS COPCO USA HOLDINGS 5,771.71 342874 02/05/2025 EFT 014614 AUTOMATED GATE SERVICES, 1,623.75 342875 02/05/2025 EFT 007650 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 1,178.99 342876 02/05/2025 EFT 021548 BASE HILL, INC. 4,825.50
342877 02/05/2025 EFT 014084 BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC 819.51 342878 02/05/2025 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 42,728.45
342879 02/05/2025 EFT 012308 ROADPOST USA ,INC. 937.30
342880 02/05/2025 EFT 015877 BOOT BARN, INC. 1,941.42
342881 02/05/2025 EFT 015877 BOOT BARN, INC. 225.00
342882 02/05/2025 EFT 003245 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 147.00 342883 02/05/2025 EFT 009761 CALIFITNESS, INC. 455.00
342884 02/05/2025 EFT 002720 CALIFORNIA TOOL & WELDING 1,270.50 342885 02/05/2025 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 360.53 342886 02/05/2025 EFT 016335 CHARTER COMMUNICATION HOL 3,072.53 342887 02/05/2025 EFT 017738 CONSOLIDATED FIRE AGENCIE 338,072.75 342888 02/05/2025 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 1,448.35 342889 02/05/2025 EFT 000662 NANCY K BOHL INC. 1,200.00 342890 02/05/2025 EFT 007554 DAVIS, JOSHUA 225.00
342891 02/05/2025 EFT 000743 DELL MARKETING L.P. 19,558.76 342892 02/05/2025 EFT 023281 STEADY MOVEMENT LLC 366.35 342893 02/05/2025 EFT 012505 DESERT ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 780.00 342894 02/05/2025 EFT 022345 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SER 112.29 342895 02/05/2025 EFT 012458 EDWARDS, BRETT 2,500.00
342896 02/05/2025 EFT 015760 FASTENAL COMPANY 375.25
342897 02/05/2025 EFT 017560 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 1,305.65 342898 02/05/2025 EFT 016767 KALMIKOV ENTERPRISES, INC 3,449.13 342899 02/05/2025 EFT 000975 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS, INC 89.76 342900 02/05/2025 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 9,325.27
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 5User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
342901 02/05/2025 EFT 003960 CENGAGE LEARNING, INC. 1,235.88 342902 02/05/2025 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 173.45 342903 02/05/2025 EFT 000031 GARCIA, JOHN 212.91
342904 02/05/2025 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 182.35
342905 02/05/2025 EFT 007552 PELAYO, ANTHONY 950.00
342906 02/05/2025 EFT 001104 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 5,488.99 342907 02/05/2025 EFT 021166 HARKEY, DAWN MARIE 150.00
342908 02/05/2025 EFT 017752 HATTRIX INC. 572.57
342909 02/05/2025 EFT 001206 HITT PLUMBING INC. 6,875.00 342910 02/05/2025 EFT 018048 INDUSTRIAL CLERICAL RECRU 1,095.36 342911 02/05/2025 EFT 024922 INFOSEND, INC 2,630.93
342912 02/05/2025 EFT 001282 INLAND KENWORTH, INC. 444.31 342913 02/05/2025 EFT 000226 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES, 6,309.25 342914 02/05/2025 EFT 022420 LORBEL, INC. 4,404.38
342915 02/05/2025 EFT 002727 VASQUEZ, LINDA J. 110.42
342916 02/05/2025 EFT 001603 MOJAVE WATER AGENCY 2,801.50 342917 02/05/2025 EFT 005602 MONTGOMERY HARDWARE CO. 4,264.79 342918 02/05/2025 EFT 018223 NEW RESOURCES GROUP, INC. 948.75 342919 02/05/2025 EFT 018621 NTT AMERICA SOLUTIONS, IN 133,493.90 342920 02/05/2025 EFT 019735 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLAT 64,600.00 342921 02/05/2025 EFT 013165 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE 6,340.50 342922 02/05/2025 EFT 010167 ARTCRAFT GROUP, INC. 520.59 342924 02/05/2025 EFT 018886 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 194.31
342925 02/05/2025 EFT 024930 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DI 136.60 342926 02/05/2025 EFT 020678 UNITED SAFETY SERVICES 391.04 342927 02/05/2025 EFT 001988 RSG, INC. 2,185.00
342928 02/05/2025 EFT 002017 SAFEWAY SIGN CO. 553.40
342929 02/05/2025 EFT 020842 ALL PURPOSE FIRE EXT. COR 2,194.47 342930 02/05/2025 EFT 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 8,304.25 342931 02/05/2025 EFT 015670 SCORPION FIRE PROTECTION, 9,450.00 342932 02/05/2025 EFT 002123 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 1,460.48 342933 02/05/2025 EFT 007081 SGM, INC. 47,300.58
342935 02/05/2025 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 523.45 342936 02/05/2025 EFT 022839 TRIMARK ASSOCIATES, INC. 4,311.00 342937 02/05/2025 EFT 002419 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 691.20 342938 02/05/2025 EFT 003089 UNITED RENTALS, INC. 4,936.22 342939 02/05/2025 EFT 029118 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPO 3,370.84 342940 02/05/2025 EFT 014536 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF C 1,674.36 342941 02/05/2025 EFT 015004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 7,242.29 342942 02/05/2025 EFT 020762 OREMOR OF VICTORVILLE, LL 449.62 342943 02/05/2025 EFT 008430 CALMAT COMPANY 1,075.94
342944 02/05/2025 EFT 002498 VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER 39,464.75 342945 02/05/2025 EFT 011361 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRI 539.91 342946 02/05/2025 EFT 002554 WAXIE'S ENTERPRISES, LLC, 4,009.05 342947 02/05/2025 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 100,110.35
798327 01/27/2025 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 8,193.93 798328 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002336 3M 3,272.39
798329 01/29/2025 PRINTED 018004 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSU 1,507.84 798330 01/29/2025 PRINTED 016435 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICE 3,178.45 798331 01/29/2025 PRINTED 015507 UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERV 32,132.15 798332 01/29/2025 PRINTED 024821 ALPHA OMEGA SEPTIC SERVIC 50,800.85 798333 01/29/2025 PRINTED 003042 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIO 1,927.55
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 6User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
798334 01/29/2025 PRINTED 017968 AVCOM SERVICES, INC. 425.00 798335 01/29/2025 PRINTED 012423 BLUEBEAM, INC. 4,440.00 798336 01/29/2025 PRINTED 010670 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 10,368.51 798337 01/29/2025 PRINTED 017353 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 418.04 798338 01/29/2025 PRINTED 000380 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 332.46 798339 01/29/2025 PRINTED 017562 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. 100.00 798340 01/29/2025 PRINTED 000618 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 978.86 798341 01/29/2025 PRINTED 000155 CENTURY LINK 458.86
798342 01/29/2025 PRINTED 021496 DG INVESTMENT INTERMEDIAT 5,320.02 798343 01/29/2025 PRINTED 014721 CORE & MAIN LP 2,039.32 798344 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023070 C. WELLS PIPELINE MATERIA 5,429.89 798345 01/29/2025 PRINTED 006348 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 1,026.92 798346 01/29/2025 PRINTED 018020 DIXON PEST CONTROL, INC. 726.00 798347 01/29/2025 PRINTED 021663 DUDEK 3,360.00
798348 01/29/2025 PRINTED 022422 ERNIE'S AUTO SERVICE CORP 623.08 798349 01/29/2025 PRINTED 014122 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 443.32 798350 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023370 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 155.20 798351 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023589 FIRST IN PRODUCTS, INC. 3,588.65 798352 01/29/2025 PRINTED 015895 GUERRERO, DANIEL 5,000.00 798353 01/29/2025 PRINTED 021441 HENRY SCHEIN, INC. 4,752.59 798354 01/29/2025 PRINTED 004021 HIGH DESERT LASER GRAPHIC 217.50 798355 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023625 HIGH DESERT PATHOLOGY MED 51.75 798356 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023338 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BER 302.00 798357 01/29/2025 PRINTED 022573 HYDROTEK INDUSTRIES 350.00 798358 01/29/2025 PRINTED 999982 JIMENEZ, CRISTINA 52.00 798359 01/29/2025 PRINTED 007605 J. E. MILLER SURVEYING, I 2,975.00 798360 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023592 LIVEVIEW TECHNOLOGIES, IN 11,833.28 798361 01/29/2025 PRINTED 001424 LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATE 52.08 798362 01/29/2025 PRINTED 022008 LPA, INC. 34,356.45
798363 01/29/2025 PRINTED 004292 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE 726.09 798364 01/29/2025 PRINTED 019454 MAGNUM ELECTRONICS, INC. 456.10 798365 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023635 MCDOUGALL, SHON 125.00 798366 01/29/2025 PRINTED 015830 MDG ASSOCIATES, INC 458.50 798367 01/29/2025 PRINTED 027847 MOJAVE DESERT & MTN INTEG 27,471.00 798368 01/29/2025 PRINTED 020366 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT MAINT 275.00 798369 01/29/2025 PRINTED 022212 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO. 65.01 798370 01/29/2025 PRINTED 001648 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3,264.58 798371 01/29/2025 PRINTED 014304 ONE SOURCE DISTRIBUTORS, 1,879.20 798372 01/29/2025 PRINTED 020329 PF SERVICES, INC. 1,225.00 798373 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023634 PICKET, TLAVIEL 125.00 798374 01/29/2025 PRINTED 022183 HINRICHS, DARREN 1,367.63 798375 01/29/2025 PRINTED 004064 PROVEST REALTY INC 30.44 798376 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023516 BESSETTE, GARY A 9,990.00 798377 01/29/2025 PRINTED 014355 QUINN COMPANY 1,175.96 798378 01/29/2025 PRINTED 006514 RITE-WAY ROOF CORPORATION 102,362.50 798379 01/29/2025 PRINTED 017036 RIVERS & LANDS CONSERVANC 990.00 798380 01/29/2025 PRINTED 003150 ROBERTSON'S 2,183.48
798381 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002746 ROTO ROOTER PLUMBERS 14,716.55 798382 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 115,691.00 798383 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 6,468.16 798384 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002071 SAN BERNARDINO CO SOLID W 2,640.46 798385 01/29/2025 PRINTED 018884 FIRST STREET PARENT, INC. 44.14
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 7User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
798386 01/29/2025 PRINTED 016345 NNN INVESTMENTS INC. 49.75 798387 01/29/2025 PRINTED 008569 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TROPH 4,857.96 798388 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 39,865.00 798389 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 487.85 798390 01/29/2025 PRINTED 024609 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 259.95 798391 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 135,001.92 798392 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 60.00 798393 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002269 SUNLAND FORD 760.06
798394 01/29/2025 PRINTED 014914 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPE 1,120.93 798395 01/29/2025 PRINTED 002475 VESD CAFETERIA 351.37
798396 01/29/2025 PRINTED 999995 WFG NATIONAL TITLE CO OF 1,068.93 798397 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023629 WILDSPARQ LLC 11,800.00 798398 01/29/2025 PRINTED 020345 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP 104.72 798399 01/29/2025 PRINTED 007234 KIRTLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC 449,106.80 798400 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023639 ACOSTA CRUZ, CESAR 96.45 798401 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023636 CARMICHAEL JR, BENJAMIN F 163.42 798402 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023644 CARRILLO, JOSE LUIS 30.44 798403 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023637 CASTILLO, JULIA LIVING RE 138.80 798404 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023649 CM REAL PROPERTIES LLC 28.01 798405 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023643 COOPER, CHRIS 120.00
798406 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023654 DODGE, KEVIN 123.98
798407 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023641 DR & G SERVICES 378.68 798408 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023646 EM INVESTMENTS GROUP, LLC 44.90 798409 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023653 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 12.93 798410 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023642 HWAYIRE, SARUDZAYI 41.59 798411 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023650 JP & SONS INC 421.54
798412 01/29/2025 PRINTED 013197 L2 GROUP LLC 70.75
798413 01/29/2025 PRINTED 019724 LGI HOMES 95.30
798414 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023648 NRRFM LLC 85.74
798415 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023645 PANORAMA REAL ESTATE HOLD 29.63 798416 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023638 PLACENCIA FAMILY LIVING T 227.05 798417 01/29/2025 PRINTED 015394 REAL ESTATE UNLIMITED 36.80 798418 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023652 RIATSU REALTY LLC 30.44 798419 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023657 RICHARDSON, ART 143.65 798420 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023640 THE HAL A AND DEBORAH M K 56.60 798421 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023647 WANG, JIONG 15.04
798422 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023655 WFG NATIONAL TITLE COMPAN 97.78 798423 01/29/2025 PRINTED 023651 YUNSHENG, SONG 18.20
798424 02/03/2025 PRINTED 013668 CHRISTENSEN BROTHERS GENE 872,466.12 798425 02/03/2025 PRINTED 013668 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 65,333.16 798426 02/05/2025 PRINTED 016218 2 HOT UNIFORMS INC 1,172.33 798427 02/05/2025 PRINTED 014878 ALLTECH INDUSTRIES, INC 31,062.57 798428 02/05/2025 PRINTED 005384 AMERON POLE PRODUCTS 4,844.51 798429 02/05/2025 PRINTED 017819 ANIMAL HOSPITAL AT THE NA 240.00 798430 02/05/2025 PRINTED 003042 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIO 1,554.20 798431 02/05/2025 PRINTED 017968 AVCOM SERVICES, INC. 125.00 798432 02/05/2025 PRINTED 000290 BATTERY MART OF APPLE VAL 829.35 798433 02/05/2025 PRINTED 000380 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 20,810.71 798434 02/05/2025 PRINTED 999975 CAMPOS, SHERRI 200.00
798435 02/05/2025 PRINTED 014097 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, 1,760.91 798436 02/05/2025 PRINTED 021482 CASTELLANOS, RAY 27.43 798437 02/05/2025 PRINTED 019377 CHAMELEON BEVERAGE COMPAN 18,314.40
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 8User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
798438 02/05/2025 PRINTED 014359 CIVILTEC ENGINEERING, INC 251.00 798439 02/05/2025 PRINTED 014721 CORE & MAIN LP 3,087.86 798440 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023435 COTTON, DANIEL 320.00
798441 02/05/2025 PRINTED 006348 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 722.72 798442 02/05/2025 PRINTED 018020 DIXON PEST CONTROL, INC. 52.41 798443 02/05/2025 PRINTED 014122 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 443.32 798444 02/05/2025 PRINTED 999979 GRIFFIN, MISTI 52.00
798445 02/05/2025 PRINTED 022788 GANNETT MEDIA CORP 430.82 798446 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023624 GARCIA, MILIA 147.62
798447 02/05/2025 PRINTED 005831 GARLAND, GARY M 225.00 798448 02/05/2025 PRINTED 010778 GARNICA-PICENO, ALFREDO 202.26 798449 02/05/2025 PRINTED 001155 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY 406.84 798450 02/05/2025 PRINTED 004021 HIGH DESERT LASER GRAPHIC 458.93 798451 02/05/2025 PRINTED 011152 HOLIDAYGOO INC. 2,456.66 798452 02/05/2025 PRINTED 004305 ICSC 350.00
798453 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023031 INTEGRATED SUPPLY NETWORK 122.76 798454 02/05/2025 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 2,506.11 798455 02/05/2025 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 3,039.85 798456 02/05/2025 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA 217.26
798457 02/05/2025 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 886.99 798458 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023592 LIVEVIEW TECHNOLOGIES, IN 7,486.36 798459 02/05/2025 PRINTED 010660 LOVELAND'S AUTOMOTIVE SER 1,501.79 798460 02/05/2025 PRINTED 022690 MAJOR, KIMBERLY 151.00 798461 02/05/2025 PRINTED 000361 MARK BROWN & ASSOCIATES, 137.50 798462 02/05/2025 PRINTED 012515 MASCARO, ANTHONY SR. 135.00 798463 02/05/2025 PRINTED 010895 MCKESSON MEDICAL SURGICAL 18,634.98 798464 02/05/2025 PRINTED 001611 MOORE, CHRISTOPHER 202.52 798465 02/05/2025 PRINTED 016208 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC 6,522.80 798466 02/05/2025 PRINTED 022212 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO. 49,865.13 798467 02/05/2025 PRINTED 001648 NAPA AUTO PARTS 1,722.66 798468 02/05/2025 PRINTED 022947 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS 2,558.20 798469 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023633 INTELLIGENCE PRESS, INC. 17,500.00 798470 02/05/2025 PRINTED 020317 PAVEMENT COATINGS CO 1,236,677.82 798471 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023445 PLASTIK PLUS, LLC 1,823.16 798472 02/05/2025 PRINTED 021906 PLAYAWAY PRODUCTS LLC 1,068.31 798473 02/05/2025 PRINTED 022183 HINRICHS, DARREN 296.31 798474 02/05/2025 PRINTED 021481 VELASCO,JOSEPH 760.77
798475 02/05/2025 PRINTED 011217 STORY, FORREST L. 185.00 798476 02/05/2025 PRINTED 014355 QUINN COMPANY 1,392.95 798477 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023351 RENEWELL FLEET SERVICE LL 112.33 798478 02/05/2025 PRINTED 018893 RICKER, JEFFERY 203.85 798479 02/05/2025 PRINTED 021758 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL 3,825.00 798480 02/05/2025 PRINTED 003150 ROBERTSON'S 809.20
798481 02/05/2025 PRINTED 020899 RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF CAL 1,540.83 798482 02/05/2025 PRINTED 022867 SANCHEZ, URIEL 193.48
798483 02/05/2025 PRINTED 014287 SAPP, DONALD 225.00
798484 02/05/2025 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 29.00 798485 02/05/2025 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 460.00 798486 02/05/2025 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 6,468.16 798487 02/05/2025 PRINTED 016345 NNN INVESTMENTS INC. 49.75 798488 02/05/2025 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 28,870.71 798489 02/05/2025 PRINTED 022830 SOUTHEAST EXHIBITS & EVEN 24,828.11
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/05/2025 16:24 Page 9User:
Program ID:
calonzo
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
798490 02/05/2025 PRINTED 024609 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 46.28 798491 02/05/2025 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 21,150.00 798492 02/05/2025 PRINTED 002269 SUNLAND FORD 301.73
798493 02/05/2025 PRINTED 002204 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 413,192.07 798494 02/05/2025 PRINTED 018850 TEREX USA LLC 570.00
798495 02/05/2025 PRINTED 014914 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPE 7,689.53 798496 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023108 VCA MESA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 3,053.80 798497 02/05/2025 PRINTED 007455 VETERANS COMMUNICATION SE 268,965.93 798498 02/05/2025 PRINTED 001147 WAGE WORKS 666.00
798499 02/05/2025 PRINTED 021570 WEBB MUNICIPAL FINANCE 20,000.00 798500 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023451 WHOLESALE VINYL FENCING 5,952.35 798501 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023563 WRIGHT, TANYA 52.00
798502 02/05/2025 PRINTED 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 360.20 798503 02/05/2025 PRINTED 018844 SMARTSHEET INC. 1,260.00 798504 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023664 AMOLSCH, CAROL 200.00
798505 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023663 BENTOW, JEFF 604.50
798506 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023671 C.A.RASMUSSEN INC 685.99 798507 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023666 DE LEON BAUTISTA, TANNYA 73.75 798508 02/05/2025 PRINTED 017814 KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGEL 689.88 798509 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023669 LGI HOMES-CALIFORNIA LLC 1,139.89 798510 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023670 MOJAVE HM LLC 814.36
798511 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023667 MONET INVESTMENTS LLC 76.98 798512 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023665 NGUYEN, KIEU A 73.75
798513 02/05/2025 PRINTED 023668 SO CAL FLIPPERS 404.61 798514 02/05/2025 PRINTED 000469 VIP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 237.43 798515 02/05/2025 PRINTED 002245 WARD, MARK C LIVING TRUST 72.31 442 CHECKS CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL 8,143,841.17 .00
Item Number: 16
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: February 18, 2025
Submitted By:
Heather Barber, Human Resources Officer
Subject:
Benefits Resolution No. 25-010 and the Employee Salary Schedule Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council adopt Benefits Resolution No. 25-010, establishing the Employee Salary Schedule and amending Fringe Benefits, effective February 18, 2025.
Fiscal Impact:
The fiscal impact associated with the net change in positions outlined as part of this resolution is included within the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 mid-year budget amendment. No additional appropriation is required.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Goal G – Organizational Effectiveness and Sustainability in that the organizational structure must be reviewed and evaluated regularly, and revised accordingly, to maximize organizational effectiveness and sustainability.
Discussion:
The Mid-Year Benefits Resolution No. 25-010 and Employee Salary Schedule (Attachment A) include the following proposed changes:
Changes to Personnel
•The total number of authorized full-time positions decreased from 560 to 553, reflecting a net decrease of seven (7) positions. The updated Employee Salary Schedule includes nine (9) added positions, sixteen (16) deleted positions, and two (2) title changes. The attached Summary of Recommended Changes to Mid- Year 2024-2025 Employee Salary Schedule (Attachment B) reflects all proposed changes.
3 9
7 9
Changes to Benefits
•Effective January 1, 2024, Senate Bill (SB) No. 848 provides eligible employees with five (5) days of unpaid reproductive loss leave after a reproductive loss event.
The eligibility for this leave is further defined in the Benefits Resolution No. 25-010. •As of January 1, 2025, full-time employees are eligible to transfer up to $23,500 of annual salary per year into a City-approved Deferred Compensation Plan. This is an increase per federal guidelines.
Changes to the Employee Salary Schedule
•The City of Victorville has contracted with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) since 1967. CalPERS is an agency that manages pension and health benefits for more than two million California Public employees, retirees, and their families.
Starting in June 2024, CalPERS conducted a standard agency audit of the City’s practices related to financial reporting for pension plans. As a result of that audit, and to comply with California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 for classic members and Section 571.1 for new members, which defines the requirements for a Publicly Available Pay Schedules needed to substantiate base salary for use in pension calculations, the City must combine the information that was previously reflected separately in the Table of Organization and the Table of Compensation into a single, citywide pay schedule. The new Employee Salary Schedule is now being presented in a format that meets the requirements of CalPERS. However, the monthly rate of pay for each position has not changed as compared to previously approved Resolution Nos. 24-036 and 24-075.
Staff is requesting your favorable consideration for this item and remains available for any questions or comments.
Attachments: A. Benefits Resolution No. 25-010 and Employee Salary Schedule
B. Summary of Recommended Changes to Mid-Year 2024-2025 Employee Salary Schedule
ATTACHMENT A
Benefits Resolution No. 25-010 and Employee Salary
Schedule
RESOLUTION NO. 25-010
A RESOLUT
ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE ESTABLISHING THE
EMPLOYEE SALARY SCHEDULE AND AMENDING FRINGE BENEFITS FOR NON-REPRESENTED
FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE INCLUDED IN RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-036, RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-075, AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS.
WHEREAS, copies of said Employee Salary Schedule and Fringe Benefits relating to an appropriation of funds at the City of Victorville were prepared and distributed to the City Council and have been available for the inspection by the public in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Victorville.
NOW, THE
REFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTIO
N 1. That the Employee Salary Schedule for Mid-Year 2024-2025 is hereby revised. A total of 553 full-time positions on such revised Employee Salary Schedule are authorized to be filled in accordance with the Personnel Ordinance of the City of Victorville. The salaries and compensation of officers and employees of the City of Victorville shall be established as provided in said Personnel Ordinance for the salary ranges to which position is assigned by this Benefit Resolution for Mid- Year 2024-2025. The Table of Organization and Table of Compensation have been combined into an Employee Salary Schedul e which meets the Government Code and California Code of Regulations (CCR) requirement 570.5 for Classic Members and 571.1 for New Members.
Benefits Resolution No. 25-010 Mid-Year 24-25