ATTACHMENT A
Pavement
Management
Program for
City Roads
Pavement Management Program
The Pavement Management Program is a system developed to:
• Analyze the City’s pavement network
• Develop Capital Improvement Projects
• Provide a decision support tool
• Find cost-effective treatments to meet desired pavement condition levels • Manage projects within imposed budget constraints
• Reports to decision makers (City Council) network:
- Conditions
- Current needs
- Projected future costs
- Work Plans
- Results of work done
Pavement Management Report (PMR)
x Is a pavement network analysis including:
- Overall pavement condition of maintained roads
- Current road sections needing work
- Estimated network level costs
- Each street condition updated every 5 year
x Prepared by consultant since 2005
Victorville Road Network Overview
479.1 centerline miles of roads
1,121 lane miles of road
101.5 million square feet of pavement
Classification Centerline
Miles % Square Feet %
Arterial 105.5 22% 30,574,830 30.1%
Collector 60.0 13% 11,302,675 11.1%
Local 307.7 64% 59,166,924 58.3%
Alleyways 5.8 1% 460,870 0.5%
Totals 479.1 100% 101,505,299 100%
Residentials Collectors Arterials
City-wide
Square Footage
x The PCI is a numerical rating resulting from a
pavement condition inspection that identifies &
represents the severity of surface distresses.
x The PCI is a scaled rating from 0 to 100
x Surface distresses identified in PCI include:
- Fatigue cracking (heavy loading):
oAlligator cracking
oRutting & depression
oPotholes
- Age-related cracking:
oBlock cracking
oLongitudinal and transverse cracking
oPatching & utility cuts
oRaveling
oWeathering
PMR Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
PCI Range Pavement Condition
86 –100 Excellent
71 - 85 Very Good
56 - 70 Good
41 - 55 Fair
26 - 40 Poor
11 - 25 Very Poor
0 - 10 Failed
Alligator
Longitudinal Transverse
Potholes
Block Block
1. City street network is broken down into street segments
2. Pavement in each segment is visually inspected
3. Surface distresses (e.g. cracks and potholes) are identified
4. Severities for distresses (low, medium, or high) are identified
5. Quantity for each type of distress is estimated
6. Distress type and quantity are input into MicroPAVER software
7. Report is generated with PCI for each street segment Method Used to Estimate PCI
0.1%
6.1%
14.0%
12.2%
20.3%
38.9%
8.2%
0 5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
0-10 11-25 26-40 41-55 56-70 71-85 86-100
Area (Square Feet)
PCI Rating
47.1% of City all streets have a PCI ranging from 71 to 100 (Good)
20.1% of City all streets have a PCI ranging from 11 to 40 (Poor) Current Pavement Conditions: All Streets
Average Network PCI = 65.7
PCI = 65
62 64
66 68
70 72
74 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 PAST 12 YR PCI TREND
0.4%
3.8%
19.1%
9.8%
24.6%
30.4%
11.9%
0 1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
0-10 11-25 26-40 41-55 56-70 71-85 86-100
Area (Square Feet)
PCI Rating
PCI = 74
PCI = 27
PCI = 50
Current Pavement Conditions: Arterial Streets
0.0%
14.8%
16.4%
9.9%
19.1%
29.0%
10.9%
0 500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
0-10 11-25 26-40 41-55 56-70 71-85 86-100
Area (Square Feet)
PCI Rating
Current Pavement Conditions: Collector Streets
0.0%
5.7%
10.9%
13.9%
18.4%
45.2%
5.8%
0 5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
0-10 11-25 26-40 41-55 56-70 71-85 86-100
Area (Square Feet)
PCI Rating
Current Pavement Conditions: Residential Streets
x Preliminary treatment method identified in PMR by PCI rating x Three treatment methods with subcategories considered:
1) Reconstruction – complete removal and replacement of the road pavement sections 2) Rehabilitation – grind of existing AC pavement and overlay of new AC on old pavement 3) Preservation:
- Slurry seal - coating of asphalt emulsion and small aggregate (sand) - Microsurfacing – similar to slurry seal with chemical additives such as polymer x Actual treatment method is selected during project design phase x Methods are selected based upon street type, condition and available budget PCI Range Condition Treatment Method Extended Life
(years)
86-100 Excellent None
71-85 Very Good Slurry Seal 5 -7
56-70 Good Microsurfacing 8 - 10
41-55 Fair 2 inch AC Overlay 12 - 20
26-40 Poor 2 Inch AC Overlay 12 - 20
11-25 Very Poor Reconstruct 30
0-10 Failed Reconstruct 30
Pavement Network Treatment Method Decision Tree
Pavement projects are prioritized by street type and information pulled from the PMR Arterial & Collector Roads (2-7 lanes)
x All treatment methods considered
x Benefit/Cost (B/C) Formula used to prioritize arterial and collector roads projects x Benefit is divided by project cost to calculate a B/C number x The higher the B/C number, the higher the priority and benefit to the City x Benefit factors
- Traffic Volume (how many cars use the road daily, largest benefit factor) - Improvement in PCI
- Extended Life of Pavement
- Length of Project
x Currently $13.4 million budgeted for FY 25/26
Local Roads
(2-lanes)
x Pavement Preservation methods only used on local streets x Slurry seal / microsurfacing projects identified by PCI rating x Project is typically in a geographic area or neighborhood (e.g. Golden Triangle) x Currently $1.6 million budgeted for FY 25/26
Capital Improvement Project Prioritization
Prioritization Benefit Cost Ratio Formula
=
ࢀࡰࢤ ࡵࡼ
ࢀࡸ
Variable Description Unit
B
Benefit to users from the increased average PCI over
the extended life of the pavement and length of the
project
None
ADT Est. Average Daily Traffic Volume Vehicles/day
PCI Pavement Condition Index. A number from 0 to 100. None UPCI / 2 Est. Avg. PCI increase over the extended life of the pavement resulting from rehabilitation project None
T Est. life of pavement extended resulting from
rehabilitation project Years
L Project Length Mile
C Est. Project Cost $
Example: Mojave Dr from Amargosa Rd to I-15
Road Name Limit To Limit From Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) PCI Rehab. Method $ / SF
Mojave Dr I-15 SB Ramps Condor Rd 1,200 61 25 Reconstruct $10.20 Mojave Dr Condor Rd Amargosa Rd 2,800 53 56 Single Mirco Surf $0.85 Road Name Limit To Limit From Est. Cost PCI
Increase
Extended
Life ADT ADT
Year
Benefit/
Cost
Ratio
Mojave Dr I-15 SB Ramps Condor Rd $768,600 75 30 40,735 2023 13.6 Mojave Dr Condor Rd Amargosa Rd $170,660 44 8 27,867 2023 3.8
=
, ૠ ૠ
, ࢚ࢌ
ૡ /࢚ࢌ
̈́ૠૡ, = .
FY 25/26 Five-Year Plan - Pavement Rehab Projects
Example: Roy Rogers R from Civic Dr to Amargosa Rd
Million $ B/C PCI
• Mojave Dr (US-395 to Seventh St) $12.6 5.3 23 to 57
• Third Ave (Nisqualli Rd to Field St) $0.8 1.5 25
• Air Expressway (National Trails Hwy to George Blvd) $5.5 9.0 27 to 39 • Bear Valley Rd (US-395 to Bellflower Rd) $0.4 5.3 63
• Amargosa Rd (Dos Palmas Rd to Village Dr) $3.6 5.1 24 to 60 • El Evado Rd (Palmdale Rd to Begonia Rd) $1.2 4.8 25
• Mariposa Rd (Talpa St to Kingswood Dr) $1.2 6.4 23 to 29 • Air Expressway (George Blvd to Phantom West) $3.0 7.3 25 • Ridgecrest Rd (Pahute Rd to Green Tree Blvd) $1.3 6.3 26 to 33 • La Paz Dr (7
th St to I-15 ramps) $1.2 7.3 32
• Seventh St (Mariposa Rd to Lorene Dr) $1.0 5.2 32
• Hesperia Rd (Bear Valley Rd to Seneca Rd) $3.2 5.0 31 to 72 Fiscal Year 26-30 Five - Year Plan Total Cost: $35 Million FY 25/26 Annual Available Funding for Pavement Projects (Million $) Fund No. Fund Name Total Revenue CIP
220 Highway Users Tax $3.9 $0
221 Local Streets &
Roads (SB1) $3.7 $3.6
250 Measure I $6.3 $2.9
Total $13.9 $6.5
x Pavement Network Unlimited Budget – $164.6 million needed today1 x $6.5 to 7.52 million annually over 20 years is insufficient x $10 million annually needed to maintain current overall PCI of 65.7 x $14 million annually would increase overall PCI to 72.9 over 10 years x $19 million annually would increase overall PCI to 80.2 over 10 years 12025 PCI Report, 2FY 2024/25 Budget
Pavement Project Needs & Funding
Total Pavement Network Needs 2025
Example: Roy Rogers R from Civic Dr to Amargosa Rd
Today’s Estimated Unlimited Budget Required for Pavement Projects Arterial Preserva tion Projects $13.9 million
Arterial Rehabilitation Projects $39.8 million
Collector Preservation Projects $4.7 million
Collector Rehabilitation Projects $22.1 million
Local Road Preservation Projects $29.4 million
Local Road Rehabilitation Pr ojects $54.7 million
Total $164.6 million to an average PCI of 80
62 64
66 68
70 72
74 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
PCI TREND
Public Works Maintenance Efforts
Example: Roy Rogers R from Civic Dr to Amargosa Rd
FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 Totals
LF of Crack Seal 223,360 199,580 130,880 100,710 23,900 678,430 Total Potholes Filled 7,714 8,389 12,658 17,367 12,041 58,169 SF of AC R&R 52,427 56,956 35,884 79,381 43,030 267,678 SF of Sidewalk R&R 20, 301 19,175 14,440 14,256 17,498 85,670 SF of New Sidewalk 5,980 0 0 0 5,052 11,032
LF of Curb R&R 399 126 118 195 1,004 1,842
LF of Curb & Gutter R&R 568 25 287 850 160 1,890
Traffic Engineering Maintenance Efforts
Example: Roy Rogers R from Civic Dr to Amargosa Rd
FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 Totals
Miles of Striping 291 285 314 569 740 2,199
No. of Legends Striped 466 1,194 757 1,542 1,753 5,712
LF of Red Curbs Painted 58,720 13,420 2,717 19,717 15,297 109,871 New Signs Installed 238 338 309 279 250 1,414
Signs Replaced 1,006 587 742 654 752 3,741
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrroooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCiiiivvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvviiiiiiicccc DDDDDDDDDDDDDDrrrrr ttttttttttttttttttttttttttooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaarrrrrrrgggggggggoooooossssaaaaaaa xaammpppllee::: RRRooyy RRoogggeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Recently Completed and Ongoing Projects
Example: Roy Rogers R from Civic Dr to Amargosa Rd
Steet Segment(s) or Project Year
Completed
Total Cost
Third Avenue from Green Tree Blvd to Nisqualli Rd 2020 $1.3 M Industrial/Silica from Bear Valley Rd to Hesperia Rd 2021 $4.6 M 7 th Street/Arrowhead Drive from Green Tree Blvd to
Bear Valley Rd
2022 $7.3 M
Green Tree Extension* 2023 $47.7 M
Liberty Village Slurry Seal Project 2022 $1.3 M
Bear Valley Rd from Ridgecrest Rd to Industrial Rd* 2023 $11.9 M Civic Area Slurry Seal Project 2024 $1.8 M
Bear Valley Road from Amethyst Rd to Highway 395 2024 $7.8 M 2024 Citywide Slurry Seal (Golden Triangle) 2024 $1.4 M 2025 Citywide Slurry Seal Phase II 2025 $1.1 M
2025 Citywide Street Improvements Project 2025 $4.9 M
Total Capital Investment in Street Improvement Projects $91.9 M *Project costs include bridge construction/widening
Future Outlook
Example: Roy Rogers R from Civic Dr to Amargosa Rd
• SBCTA is preparing a ballot measure for 2026 to extend Measure I beyond 2040 without a sunset clause and SBCTA is also considering doubling the Measure I sales tax rate from 0.5% to 1%
• Measure I revenue is down
• SB-1 revenues are steady
• Newly formed City CFD does not address existing demand for services • Victorville should consider an infrastructure ballot measure - Transaction And Use Tax