City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR
JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
Regular Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, February 17, 2026
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
The
City
Council
holds
its
business
meetings
in
public
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
Ralph
M.
Brown
Act,
its
established
policies
and
procedures,
and
its
adopted
parliamentary
authority.
The
Council
strives
to
carry
out
its
meetings
in
an
atmosphere
of
professionalism
with
full
participation
by
members
of
the
body
and
the
public.
As
such,
the
Presiding
Officer
is
empowered
to
govern
City
Council
Meetings
to
foster
the
efficient
and
fair
administration
of
City
business
and
reserves
the
right
to
enforce
(or
cause
to
be
enforced)
the
Meeting
Rules
of
Conduct
and
Decorum
as
set
forth
in
Chapter
5 of
the
City
Council Policy and Procedures Manual.
The
City
Council
welcomes
and
encourages
public
participation
and
invites
the
community
to
attend
in
person.
City
Council
Meetings
will
be
held
in-person
at
City
Hall
in
Council
Chambers.
Remote
viewing
of
our
Council
Meetings
is
available
through
YouTube,
but
public
comments
must
be
given
in-person
at
the
meeting or in advance as noted below.
Public
Comments:
Members
of
the
public
may
submit
comments
electronically
by
4 p.m.
the
day
of
the
meeting
to
be
distributed
to
City
Council.
Participants
are
invited
to
address
the
Council
on
agendized
and
non-agendized
topics
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
Public
comments
will
be
no
longer
than
three
(3)
minutes
per
community
member.
Should
a
speaker
conclude
their
comments
prior
to
the
expiration
of
three
(3)
minutes,
the
speaker
waives
the
right
to
speak
for
any
remaining
amount
of
time.
For
further
information
about
how
to
address
the
Council,
please refer to the City's website at
victorvilleca.gov/agendas
.
LEVINE
ACT
DISCLOSURE:
Pursuant
to
the
Levine
Act
(Govt.
Code
section
84308),
any
party
to
a
permit,
license,
contract,
or
other
entitlement
before
the
Victorville
City
Council
is
required
to
disclose
on
the
record
any
campaign
contribution,
including
aggregated
contributions,
of
more
than
$500
made
by
the
party
or
the
party's
agents
within
the
preceding
12 months
to
any
City
official.
Participants
and
agents
are
requested
to
make
this
disclosure
as
well.
The
disclosure
must
include
the
name
of
the
party,
participant,
or
agent,
and
any
other
person
making
the
contribution;
the
name
of
the
recipient,
the
amount
of
the
contribution,
and
the
date
the
contribution was made.
In
compliance
with
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act,
if
you
need
special
assistance
to
participate
in
this
meeting,
please
contact
the
City
Clerk's
office
at
(760)
955-5188
no
later
than
72 hours
prior
to
the
meeting.
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Introduction to Public Comments
Public Comments for Closed Session Items
Declaration of Closed Session Item(s) by City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL
A.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Number of Potential Cases: One (1)
B.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Number of cases: One (1)
Name of Parties: Chi Wah Wong
Case no.: CIVVS2400383
C.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Number of cases: One (1)
Name
of
Parties:
Golden
State
Environmental
Justice
Alliance,
55555
Amargosa,
LLC, and Steeno Design Studio, Inc.
Case no.: CIVRS2504766
Recess to Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Closed Session Announcements by the City Attorney
Invocation: Pastor Carlo Mendoza with Sunrise Church
Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain Jerry Davenport
Proclamations/Special Presentations
Presentation
Recognizing
Ashley
Barahona,
Winner
of
the
City’s
Annual
Civil
Rights
Memorial
Essay
Contest
and,
NextEra
Energy
Resources,
Sponsor
of
the
City’s
Annual
Civil Rights Memorial Essay Contest
City Clerk Swearing in of Battalion Chief Marcus Lynch
City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda
Conflict of Interest Declarations
Any
items
on
this
agenda
that
might
be
a
conflict
of
interest
to
any
Council
Members/Board Members should be identified at this time.
Introduction to Public Comments
Public Comments
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. United
States
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development
Required
Public
Hearing
for
Community
Planning
and
Development
Grants
for
Fiscal
Year
2026-
2027
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Open
and
conduct
a
Public
Hearing
to
receive
citizen,
agency,
and
prospective
applicant
comments
regarding
the
City’s
needs
and
strategies
for
the
2026-2027
Annual Action Plan; and
(2) Close the Public Hearing.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2. City Council Members’ Proof of Residency
Recommendation:
That the City Council receive the proof of residency information as provided herein.
3. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Commercial
Demand
Schedule
No.
15 for
the
period
of
January
08,
2026,
through
January
21,
2026,
in
total
amount of $7,709,516.61. This total includes:
•
Electronic
Fund
Transfers
No.
347502
through
347649
and
Warrant
No.
802511 through 802658 in the amount of $7,709,516.61.
All
are
consistent
with
the
adopted
Fiscal
Year
2025-2026
Budget
(covering
July
1,
2025, through June 30, 2026).
4. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 20560
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Approve
a
20-percent
release
of
the
Water,
Drainage,
Street,
and
Traffic
Signal
Faithful Performance Improvement Securities for Tract Map No. 20560; and (2)
Accept
the
completed
Water,
Drainage,
Street,
and
Traffic
Signal
public
improvements.
5. Wellness Center Quarterly Report
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
review
and
file
the
attached
Wellness
Center
Quarterly Report.
6. Payroll Demand Schedule No. 5A
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Payroll
Demand
Schedule
No.
5A
for
the
payroll
period
of
October
24,
2025,
through
November
7,
2025,
in
total
amount of $2,397,664.42. This total includes:
•
Employee Check Nos. 34730 through 34733 in the amount of $4,541.87. •
Vendor Check Nos. 34734 through 34739 in the amount of $2,627.10. •
Advice Nos. 335799 through 336380 in the amount of $1,549,239.62; and •
Vendor Electronic Payments totaling $841,255.83.
All
expenditures
are
consistent
with
the
adopted
Fiscal
Year
2025–2026
Budget
(covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
7. Security Substitution for Tract Map No. 17701
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Approve
the
execution
of
a
Subdivision
Improvement
Agreement
with
Crossings
at Victorville L.P.;
(2)
Approve
the
execution
of
a
Lien
Agreement
as
improvement
security
with
Crossings at Victorville L.P.;
(3)
Release
the
existing
Subdivision
Improvement
Agreement
with
Crossings
at
Victorville L.P.;
(4)
Approve
the
execution
of
a
Release
of
the
existing
Utility
Surety
Agreement
with
Crossings at Victorville, L.P.; and
(5)
Approve
the
execution
of
a
Partial
Release
of
the
existing
Land
Division
Improvement Construction Agreement with Shirley and Charles Westover.
8. Minutes of the January 20 and February 3, 2026, Regular City Council Meetings
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
minutes
of
the
Regular
City
Council
Meetings held on January 20 and February 3, 2026.
9. Building Department Fiscal Year-to-Date Report
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file.
10. Automatic License Plate Reader Annual Report
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
review
and
file
the
attached
Annual
License
Plate
Reader Annual Report.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
11. Standard
Lease
Agreement
for
Buildings
867,
867A
and
Cut-Up
Pad
Space
by
and
between
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
and
Aircraft
Recycling
Corporation
Recommendation:
That
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
(“SCLAA”)
Board
of
Directors:
(1)
Approve
entering
into
a
Standard
Lease
Agreement
for
Buildings
867,
867A
and
Cut-Up
Pad
Space
(“Agreement”),
by
and
between
the
SCLAA
and
Aircraft
Recycling Corporation; and
(2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute said Agreement; and (3) Adopt Resolution No. SCLAA 26-002 amending the 2025/2026 budget
increasing
revenue
in
Airport
account
4501174A-45200
by
$471.48
and
Airport account 4501185A-45220 by $10,053.40.
12. Amendment
No.
2 to
the
Consultant/Professional
Services
Provider
Agreement
with
Woodard
&
Curran,
Inc.,
for
Industrial
Wastewater
Treatment
Plant
Expansion
2024 Design and Construction Support, Project CC24-099
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
Victorville
Water
District
Board
of
Directors
approve
Amendment
No.
2 to
the
Consultant/Professional
Services
Provider
Agreement
with
Woodard
&
Curran,
Inc.,
increasing
the
total
compensation
not
to
exceed
amount
to
$6,702,018,
updating
the
Fee
Schedule
to
include
additional
services,
and extending the agreement term through December 31, 2027.
13. Award
of
a
Consultant/Professional
Services
Provider
Agreement
for
the
Conservation as a California Way of Life Technical Assistance Plan
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
Board
of
Directors
award
a
Consultant/Professional
Agreement
to
Maddaus
Water
Management
in
the
amount
of
$137,123
for
City
of
Victorville
2025
Conservation
as
a
California
Way
of
Life
Technical
Assistance
Plan,
Project
No. CC26-058.
14. Victorville
Municipal
Utility
Service
(”VMUS“)
Shop/Warehouse
Design
and
Construction Estimate
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
award
a
Consultant/Professional
Services
Provider
Agreement
to
BFK
Architecture
+
Planning
in
the
amount
of
$170,000
for
the
VMUS
Shop/Warehouse
Design
and
Construction
Estimate,
Project
CC26-042
(”Project”).
15. Discussion
and
possible
action
to
name
the
new
Victorville
Library
after
former
Council Member and City Manager James L. Cox
Recommendation:
Any action is at the discretion of Your Honorable City Council.
16. City Manager Reports
17. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Upcoming Agenda Items
18. Reports from Council Members
Adjournment
Item Number: 1
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing(s)
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Alex Jauregui, City Planner
Subject:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Required Public Hearing for Community Planning and Development Grants for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Open and conduct a Public Hearing to receive citizen, agency, and prospective applicant comments regarding the City’s needs and strategies for the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan; and
(2) Close the Public Hearing.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact at this time; however, associated Agenda items in the future will guide the disbursement of approximately $1.91 million dollars in federal Community Planning and Development (CPD) Grants.
Strategic Plan Goal:
The subject public hearing will allow the City Council to obtain public input regarding the future allocation of available HUD funding via the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan, which will enable the City to further fulfill the following Goals outlined in the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan:
• Goal A (Financial Sustainability) – Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds represent funding opportunities that require limited financial commitments while ensuring greater availability of general fund resources.
• Goal D (Reduce Homelessness) – Eligible activities such as public service and housing projects are aimed to directly benefit the homeless population as well as those at risk of homelessness, providing the City an opportunity to expand the outreach network and partnerships.
4 5
6 9
Background:
In 1997, the City of Victorville became an Entitlement City with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This status allows the City to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds directly from HUD. Prior to Victorville’s status as an Entitlement City, CDBG funding was awarded to the City of Victorville through the County of San Bernardino and was subject to projects/programs that fulfilled a countywide need rather than those specific to the City.
The City of Victorville successfully formed a consortium in 2003 with the Town of Apple Valley in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) entitlement status with HUD. The successful formation of the consortium results in an annual allocation of HOME funds to both communities, which can be used in concert with CDBG funding to address specific needs within the City of Victorville.
As an Entitlement City for both programs, staff is responsible for all required tasks including program development, application guidance and processing, determination of project eligibility, project oversight, contract compliance, all reporting requirements, and direct draw of funds from HUD.
One of the key requirements of an Entitlement City status is the development of a five- year planning document, known as the Consolidated Plan (ConPlan). Pursuant to Section 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91, HUD has established regulations that set forth the ConPlan process. The ConPlan is designed to help states and local jurisdictions to assess their affordable housing and community development needs, market conditions, and to make data-driven, place-based investment decisions. The ConPlan, which may have a duration of between 3 and 5 years, describes the jurisdiction’s community development priorities and multiyear goals based on an assessment of housing and community development needs, an analysis of current housing and economic market conditions and available resources. Subpart E of Section 24 CFR Part 91, requires local governments that participate in a consortium to include said consortium in the ConPlan. Pursuant to this regulation, on April 19, 2022, the City of Victorville adopted the 2022-2026 ConPlan, including the required consortium component.
The ConPlan is carried out through Annual Action Plans, which provide a concise summary of the actions, activities and the specific federal and non-federal resources that will be used each year to address the priority needs and specific goals identified by the ConPlan. Each year, grantees must submit an updated Action Plan describing specific planned uses for HUD program funds, including CDBG and HOME. The fiscal year 2026- 2027 Annual Action Plan represents the fifth and final program year of the 2022-2026 ConPlan. A copy of the ConPlan (Attachment A) in its entirety is available for the public on the City’s website; however, the priority needs outlined in the City’s 2022-2026 ConPlan are provided for your reference as follows:
Supportive services for the homeless and at risk
Human services
4 5
6 9
Housing programs
Accessibility and Mobility
Economic Development
As part of the Action Plan preparation and adoption process, citizens of the City of Victorville are afforded an opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs and issues affecting very-low and low income persons. Public notices to facilitate community participation were published in a local newspaper 10 days prior to the hearing date in accordance with the Citizen Participation Plan (Attachment B), which included notices in both English and Spanish and the notice was also placed at the Hook Community Center and posted on the City’s website. Lastly, statements regarding the availability of special accommodations for non-English speaking persons and those with disabilities are printed on all written materials pertaining to the Annual Action Plan development.
Discussion:
The purpose of this HUD required public hearing is to gather community input, incorporate citizen participation and complete the tasks necessary in the creation of the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan by:
(1) Receiving citizen and agency comments regarding the City’s needs and strategies for the upcoming 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan, including comments regarding proposed projects for FY 2026-2027, as required by HUD guidelines in the City of Victorville’s Citizen Participation Plan; and
(2) Allowing prospective applicants for FY 2026-2027 CDBG/HOME grant funds an opportunity to share their needs.
ESTIMATED FUNDING:
The City is estimated to receive a 2026-2027 CDBG allocation amount of $1,409,225 and a HOME allocation of $508,362.83, based on 2025-2026 grant allocations. As of this writing, the 2026-2027 Federal budget has not been approved and HUD states that the grant amounts may change depending upon their final, actual appropriation. For reference, the current fiscal year 2025-2026 funding is provided in Attachment C.
Additionally, the noted amounts are anticipated to remain consistent annually over the course of the 5-year ConPlan with slight increases or decreases possible based upon historic fluctuations in funding allocations due to various factors including population and need.
1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The City is required to utilize CDBG grant funding to “provide decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities.” It is required by the Federal government that “the aggregate use of CDBG funds....shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons ...”. This grant has maximum funding limits for Public Services (15%), 4 5
6 9
Construction (65%), and Administration (20%); however, it is generally distributed as follows:
Public Service Projects - $211,384 (15% of Total CDBG Allocation) Construction/Other Projects - $915,996 (65% of Total CDBG Allocation) Administration - $281,845 (20% of Total CDBG Allocation) TOTAL - $1,409,225 (2025-2026 estimated CDBG Allocation)
2. HOME
The City is required to utilize HOME grant funding to “provide decent affordable housing to lower-income households; expand the capacity of nonprofit housing providers; strengthen the ability of state and local governments to provide housing; and leverage private-sector participation.” HOME funds have a minimum 15% funding restriction that is dedicated to Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs), and an Administration cap of 10%. The City of Victorville and the Town of Apple Valley have established a consortium in order to meet the population threshold for HOME entitlement status. Pursuant to HUD’s HOME Consortia Participating Members Percentage Report, Victorville’s funds will be distributed as follows:
Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) - $76,255 (Required 15% minimum of HOME Allocaiton)
Construction/Other Projects - $381,271.33 (75% of HOME Allocation) Administration - $50,836.50 (Maximum 10% of HOME Allocaiton) TOTAL - $508,362.83 (2026-2027 estimated HOME Allocation) In addition, the HOME Program requires that federal HOME funds be matched 25% with non-federal forms of subsidy. Unless HUD waives the local match requirement, applicants for HOME funding will be responsible for providing match contributions. As of the current fiscal year, the Apple Valley/Victorville Consortium has been deemed fiscally distressed by HUD and this matching fund requirement has been waived as it has been in previous funding cycles.
APPLICATIONS, PROJECT TYPES AND FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Applications
The deadline to submit applications for FY 2026-2027 funding was January 30, 2026 from non-profit agencies and City departments. Staff has begun evaluating the applications to determine eligibility using the federal CDBG and HOME criteria.
2. Project Types
Public Service Projects are defined by the population they serve and may only be funded by CDBG. Most public service projects are determined to be eligible based on the federal guidelines that presume certain groups are eligible, such as the homeless, victims of domestic violence, senior adults, certain at-risk groups such as the unemployed and youth, and low/moderate income families. CDBG 4 5
6 9
regulations place a 15% cap on funds that can be allocated to Public Service Projects. Staff anticipates a total of $211,384 will be available to fund projects defined as Public Service Projects in the upcoming 2026-2027 program year.
Construction and Other Community Development Projects are generally limited by their location and are funded with CDBG. A target area map determined by the 2020 census defines those areas where there exists a concentrated portion of the low and moderate-income population, or an area severely affected by blight. A map of the City's current CDBG targeted areas has been included with this agenda item as Attachment D. A project is eligible under this funding type when it demonstrates that the immediate or target area benefits from the project or activity.
During the subject program year approximately $915,996 is available to fund projects defined as Construction and Other Community Development Projects.
Housing Projects may also be funded from this category.
Housing Projects may be funded with either CDBG or HOME funds. CDBG regulations limit housing activities to “providing or improving permanent residential structures which, upon completion will be occupied by low and moderate-income persons”. HOME regulations are designed to provide affordable housing to low and very-low-income households. HUD requires a minimum of 15% of the total HOME allocation to be reserved for CHDO activities. Approximately $381,271.33 in HOME funds is anticipated to be available to fund non-CHDO housing projects.
Housing Projects may also be funded utilizing the $915,996 in CDBG funds from the Construction and Other Community Development Projects category listed above.
3. Funding Considerations
Funding caps are established by statute for administration (CDBG - 20% and HOME – 10% maximum of the total grant award), public service projects (CDBG - 15% maximum of the total grant award) and CHDO projects (HOME – 15% minimum). Although these fundings limits were previously waived in conjunction with associated but separate CDBG-CV funds (CDBG CARES Act funding in repsonse to the coronavirus pandemic), such waivers are not applicable to the subject CDBG & HOME funds being discussed.
A. Council Policy
On November 15, 1994 (amended April 4, 1995, May 1998 and January 15, 2019), the City Council adopted a policy that established guidelines for determining CDBG/HOME program and project priority. The policy states that Council is tasked with the responsibility of determining program and project priority as well as allocating funds during the fiscal year in which grant funds are available. In order to facilitate the annual allocation of funds, the City Council designates two members of the Council to serve on the CPD Grants Subcommittee. Currently, Mayor Becerra and Councilmember Irving are appointed to serve on the CPD Grants Subcommittee, which will 4 5
6 9
make recommendations to the City Council for formal review and approval in conjunction with the Annual Action Plan.
B. Religious Organizations
The White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships was established by former President George W. Bush through executive order on January 29, 2001. The initiative sought to strengthen faith-based and community organizations and expand their capacity to provide federally funded social services. HUD revised its regulations to remove barriers to the participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs. In general, no group of applicants competing for HUD funds should be subject to greater or fewer requirements than other organizations solely because of their religious character or affiliation. However, HUD does require that organizations clearly delineate eligible and ineligible uses of funds. HUD’s final rule stipulates that a recipient organization may not use direct HUD funds to support inherently religious activities, such as prayer, worship, religious instruction, or proselytization.
C. Fair Housing
Affirmatively furthering fair housing is a legal requirement for federal grantees to support the goals of the Fair Housing Act of 1968. There are no requirements for minimum funding levels, or funding caps for this activity.
The City’s responsibilities include identifying barriers to fair housing and taking appropriate actions to overcome the effects of those barriers. This activity is generally contracted to organizations that principally offer fair housing services as well as landlord/tenant mediation, such as Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. Additionally, the 2022-2026 ConPlan includes an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. This analysis, along with the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Plan adopted in conjunction with the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element, will be incorporated into the Annual Action Plan to ensure compliance with applicable goals.
CPD Grants Subcommittee and Allocation of Funds:
The CPD Grants Subcommittee will work with staff to review applications and provide their funding recommendations prior to the adoption of the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan.
It is anticipated that the City Council will award grant amounts as part of the adoption of the Annual Action Plan during a public meeting anticipated to occur in May 2026.
Staff is available to answer questions as needed.
4 5
6 9
Prepared By:
Alex Jauregui, City Planner
Attachments: A. 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan
B. Citizen Participation Plan
C. 2025-2026 CDBG/HOME Allocations
D. CDBG Target Area Map
ATTACHMENT A
2022-2026
Consolidated Plan
Draft Consolidated Plan
2022-2026
Draft Annual Action Plan
FY 2022– 2026
This page is intentionally left blank.
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Debra Jones
Mayor
Leslie Irving
Mayor Pro Tem
Elizabeth Becerra
Council Member
Blanca Gomez
Council Member
This page is intentionally left blank.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .........................................................2 ES-05 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 2 The Process ........................................................................ 9 PR-05 Lead & responsible agencies ......................................................................................................9 Needs Assessment ........................................................ 43 NA-05 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 43 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment ..................................................................................................... 45 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs ....................................................... 54 Housing Market Analysis ............................................ 62 MA-05 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 62 MA-10 Number of Housing Units ......................................................................................................... 67 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing ..................................................................... 72 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets ....................................................... 76 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households ........................................................................................................................................................ 85 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation, Victorville ................................................................................................. 87 Strategic Plan .................................................................. 89 SP-05 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 89 SP-10 Geographic Priorities ...................................................................................................................... 91 SP-25 Priority Needs ..................................................................................................................................... 92 SP-35 Anticipated Resources ................................................................................................................. 98 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure ............................................................................................. 101 DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE ii
SP-45 Goals Summary .............................................................................................................................. 105 SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards ....................................................................................................... 107 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy ................................................................................................................. 109 SP-80 Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................... 111 2022-2023 Action Plan .................................................113 AP-15 Expected Resources ...................................................................................................................... 113 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................. 115 AP-35 Projects ................................................................................................................................................. 117 AP-38 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................... 119 AP-50 Geographic Distribution ........................................................................................................... 129 AP-85 Other Actions................................................................................................................................... 130 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements .........................................................................................133
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 2
Executive Summary
ES-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
The City of Victorville is a growing and vibrant community conveniently located between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Incorporated in 1962, the City has grown from 8,110 residents in an area of 9.7 acres to over 128,000 residents in 74.16 acres. The City has long been part of essential transportation corridors, including Route 66 and Interstate 15. Pride of place is evident in the clean air, mountain vistas and big skies, and pride of people is evident in the strong entrepreneurial spirit, and commitment to neighbors through volunteerism. Victorville has evolved and experienced significant growth in population and economic activity in the last 60 years.
The City of Victorville prepared the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, with select analyses required to receive federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The Consolidated Plan provides the U nited States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with a comprehensive assessment of the City’s housing and community development needs and outlines the City’s priorities, objectives, and strategies for the investment of CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Consortium funds to address these needs over the next five years, beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2027.
The City of Victorville and the Town of Apple have formed the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium. Thi s strategy enables the City and Town to access HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds and make more affordable housing resources available to residents. Apple Valley serves as the lead agency for coordinating the Co nsortium’s Consolidated Planning process and submission. Each jurisdiction is responsible for administering its own CDBG program, while the Town of Apple Valley administers the HOME program for both jurisdictions. HOME objectives and goals are determined by both jurisdictions through an extensive analysis of housing needs for low er income residents, as specified by the program regulations. Each jurisdiction is also responsible for preparing its own Annual Action Plan and Consolidated Annual Perf ormance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
The City and Consortium receive CDBG and HOME funds from HUD on a formula basis each year, and in turn, awards grants and loans to nonprofit, for -profit, public organizations, and residents for programs and projects in fu rtherance of this Plan.
These programs provide for a wide range of eligible activities to address the needs of Victorville residents.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 3
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program with three primary objectives against which HUD evaluates the Consolidated Plan and the City’s performance. Those primary objectives are decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities for low - and moderate- income persons. The CDBG regulations require each activity meet one of the following national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate-income persons; or
• Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or • Meet other community development needs having a particular urge ncy (usually the result of a natural disaster).
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME)
The Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 created the HOME program to expand the supply of affordable housing for low - and moderate-income households. Often used in partnership with local nonprofit housing development organizations, the HOME program can support a wide range of affordable housing activities, including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating rental and housing ownership to low- and moderate-income people. Additionally, HOME funds are used to fund the City’s Senior Home Repair Program.
For the 2022 -2023 Program Year, it is es timated the City will receive $ 1,447,740 of CDBG funds and it is estimated the Consortium will receive $783,168 in HOME funds.
When combined with available prior year resources, the 202 2-2023 Action Plan allocates $1,683,386 of CDBG funds, and $538,967 of HOME funds to program activities listed below that will be implemented from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023.
2022-2023 CDBG Public Service Activities
Assistance League of Victor Valley: Operation School Bell $23,639 Child Advocates of San Bernardino County $10,000
Family Assistance Program $11,820
Greater Hope Foundation for Children $19,699
High Desert Homeless Services $31,515
Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board $28,000
Millionaire Mind Kids $10,000
Moses House Ministries $20,369
Partners Against Violence $15,760
Rock'n Our Disabilities Foundation $22,720
Victor Valley Domestic Violence $23,639
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 4
2022-2023 CDBG & HOME Capital Activities
High Desert Homeless Services $300,000
Route 66 Victor Valley Revitalization $150,000
Victor Valley Community Services Council $34,000
City of Victorville – Blight Abatement $104,000
City of Victorville – Code Enforcement $250,000
City of Victorville – Demolition $175,145.72
City of Victorville – Planning: Residential Rehabilitation Program $200,000 City of Victorville – Public Works – Graffiti Abatement *$0.00 City of Victorville – Planning – Senior Home Repair Program (HOME) $131,561 Hughes Training and Development (HOME) $272,665
* Program will be funded up to requested $12,500 in surplus allocation of funds 2022-2023 Program Administration Activities
CDBG Program Administration $289,548
HOME Program Administration $26,948
Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan needs assessment Overview
The priority needs and goals identified in the Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City’s Resident and Stakeholder Surveys and the housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (eCon Planning Suite). Data supplied by HUD includes the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same period .
Other sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies and cited publicly available data.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Plan:
• Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Human services
• Housing programs
• Accessibility and mobility
• Economic Development
Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG and HOME programs to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low - and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 5
activities aligned with the following measurable goals included in the Strategic Plan section of this Plan:
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 7
There were some delays to construction projects toward the end of the five-year cycle due to the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). To limit spread of COVID-19 and protect City staff and residents from the virus in person interactions were suspended limiting the City’s ability to conduct job walks or enter construction contracts. Construction projects resumed in 2021-2022.
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The Consolidated Plan regulations at 24 CFR Part 91 provide the citizen participation and consultation requirements for the development of the Consolidated Plan. Chief among those requirements is the need to consult with the Continuum of Care (CoC) to address homelessness , Public Housing Authorities (PHA), business leaders, civic leaders and public or private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services, employment, or education needs of low -income individuals and families, homeless individuals an d families, youth and/or other persons with special needs. Information supplied by these community stakeholders, together with the data supplied by HUD resulted in a well -informed planning document that reflects the housing, community and economic development needs and priorities for the City of Victorville over the next five years.
From October 2021 through April 2022, the City’s Planning Department held a community meeting, two public hearings, a public meeting, focus groups and surveys to afford citizens and local and regional organizations representing low - and moderate-income residents the maximum feasible opportunity to provide input on the housing and community development needs of the City. The resident and stakeholder surveys solicited input from re sidents and employees working in Victorville. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in thei r experience for various types of improvements that could potentially be addressed with CDBG and HOME resources. The focus groups were organized by interest group:
food banks and homeless services; youth and education services; public servicers; veterans, elderly and disables services; and faith-based organizations. The community meetings and were publicly noticed.
Summary of public comments
A community meeting and two public hearing were held to receive comments on the housing and community development needs. The community meeting was held on November 17, 2021, at 10 am and 6 pm. The public hearings were held on February 15, 2022, and April 19, 2022 at 6 pm Participants were encouraged to join remotely via the video conferencing application Zoom.
A public meeting to discuss applications received in response to the City’s Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 2022-2023 CDBG funds was held before the Victorville Community Development and Planning Grants Subcommittee on March 3, 2022.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 8
The City of Victorville received two written comments and 12 participants spoke at the February 15 public hearing. All comments were accepted and entered into the record.
A summary of these comments may be found in Appendix B.
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them
All comments and views received by the City in the development of the Consolidated Plan were accepted and taken into consideration in the development of the Consolidated Plan.
Summary
Examination of 201 3-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, in addition to local data, as well as consultation with citizens and stakeholders revealed five high priority needs to be addressed through the investment of an anticipated $ 7.1 million of CDBG and $3.9 million HOME Consortium funds over the five -year period of the Consolidated Plan. The investment of CDBG and HOME funds in eligible activities shall be guided principally by the three goals of the Strategic Plan. Activities submitted for consideration in response to any solicitation or Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) process must conform with one of the four Strategic Plan strategies and the associated action-oriented, measurable goals to receive consideration for CDBG or HOME Consortium funding.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 10
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Alejandro Jauregui, Senior Planner
City of Victorville
Planning Department
14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, CA 92392
(760) 955-5132
Orlando Acevedo, Director
Town of Apple Valley
Business Development and Communications
14955 Dale Evans Parkway, Apple Valley, CA 92307
(760) 240-7915
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 11
PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(l) and 91.315(l)
1. Introduction
In the preparation of the Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with public and private departments and agencies and social service and non- profit organizati ons to understand the community’s needs and available resources. The City met with several department representatives to provide information about the Consolidated Plan and its processes. Department staff provided input on how CDBG resources could be used and leveraged to provide services. Focus group participants highlighted the priority needs in general terms and specific to the population.
Other jurisdictions within the region were contacted and consulted, including the Town of Apple Valley. As the HOME Consortium lead agency, the Town of Apple Valley held joint community meetings as well as strategy sessions to determine priority use of HOME funding over the next 5 years. During the joint consultation process, the Consortium provided detailed informat ion about the Con solidate Plan and HOME program, the Consortiums distribution of funds and current projects using HOME funds.
The City of Victorville recognizes Victorville residents are the center of and partners in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The Citizen Participation Plan establishes a means by which citizens, public agencies and other interested parties can actively participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan and the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report.
Opportunities to participate in the planning process were provided throughout.
Special effort was made to engage low-income persons. City efforts to make opportunities for engagement known include:
• Public notices printed in the local newspaper in English and Spanish. • Public notices posted on the City’s website in English and Spanish. • Public notices posted at community facilities including library in English and Spanish.
• Web-based surveys links were shared widely through the City’s social media accounts and blast and direct email and hard copies were available at the City Planning Department.
• Stakeholder meetings were targeted to specific groups; especially those of people with disabilities, disadvantaged youths, homeless people.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 12
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).
The City recognizes the importance of careful coor dination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG program. As a result, during the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with organizations that provide assisted housing, health services and other community - focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys, invitations to community meetings, and follow-up in-person interviews where appropriate.
The City further recognizes the importance of continued coordination and alignment during the upcoming five -year planning period with these organizations and agencies. The City will reinforce these partnerships through the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds each year and through technical assistance provided to subrecipients.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness To help prevent homelessness and protect at- risk populations the City supports and participates in the San Bernardino County Continuum of Care System and the San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership. The City plans to fund CoC member, High Desert Homeless Ser vices, over the 5 -year planning period to assist in efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS
The City is not a direct recipient of ESG funding. However, it is a participating jurisdiction in the CoC and works closely with the homeless provider system to create funding policies and procedures for ESG.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 34
income needs are meet, issues are comprehensively evaluated and thoroughly addressed. Aside from these partnerships, other departments within the City are involved in collaborating and cooperating with state and federal entities in planning efforts.
PR-15 Citizen Participation - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c)
1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation
Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting In preparation for the Consolidated Plan the City followed the established processes of the Citi zen Participation Plan to ensure broad community engagement . At each step the City worked to ensur e low- and moderate-income residents, members of minority groups, agencies involved in the provision of services to these populations, and others who are dire ctly impacted by the programs and activities supported by the Consolidated Plan programs had the opportunity to be actively involved. The Citizen Participation Plan, Consolidated Plan, Action Plan, C onsolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (C APER) and the Assessment of Fair Housing Choice are posted on the City website at:
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/city-
departments/development/planning/grant-programs/2022-2027-consolidated-plan and a hard copy will be available for review in the City Planning Department for 30 days from March 21 to April 19, 2022.
To assist in identification of priority needs citizens were engaged through community meetings, surveys, public hearings, and individual meetings. Citizens wh o participated in the process received extensive information about the Consolidated Plan, citizen participation process, HUD requirements for an entitlement City, the amount of funding the City anticipates receiving and how those funds can be used by the City. Residents were given the opportunity to provide City staff with their input on the prioritization of community needs. Each of these efforts, including review of HUD Data and relevant policy documents, assisted the City in its goal setting efforts.
Two publicly noticed meetings were held at different stages in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The community meeting on November 17, 2021, and the public hearing February 15, 2022. Twelve residents spoke at the February meeting and two written comments were received. All comments were accepted and entered into the record. A summary of these comments may be found in Appendix B.
In November 2021, the City opened surveys to afford citizens and local and regional organizations representing low -and-moderate income persons the maximum feasible opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 35
of the City. The surveys solicited input from residents and employees working in Victorville. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in their neighborhoods for various types of improvements which could potentially be addressed using federal funds, such as CDBG and HOME allocations. The electronic survey was made available on the City’s website and across its social media platforms.
It was also made available in hard copy at the City’s Planning Department. The survey was available in English and in Spanish, as recommended in the Citizen Participation Plan. The resident survey received 25 responses and the stakeholder survey received four responses.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 38
4 Internet
Outreach
Non-
targeted/broa
d community
The Resident
Survey was
available online
and in paper
format at the
Planning
Department
from
November 17 to
January 14,
2022. The City
advised
residents and
stakeholders of
the availability
of the survey via
email to
stakeholders,
posting on the
City websi te,
Facebook,
Twitter,
announcement
s at City Council
meetings, and
during the
Community
Meetings.
The purpose
of the survey
was to allow
all residents
the
opportunity
to provide
their
assessment
of the level
of need in
Victorville
for a variety
of housing ,
community,
and
economic
developmen
t activities.
In total, 25
residents
completed
the survey. A
summary of
all survey
responses is
provided in
Appendix B.
All survey
responses
were
accepted.
https://forms.office.com/r/x6XvJ4c1dr
5 Newspape
r Ad
Non-targeted/
broad
community
Newspaper ad
published
February 4,
2022 in the
Daily Press
No public
comments
were
received.
No
comments
were
received.
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/agend
as/-fsiteid-1
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 40
6 Public
Hearing
Non-
targeted/broa
d community
A public
hearing was
held before the
Victorville City
Council on
February 15,
2022, in the
Victorville City
Council
Chamber and
live via Zoom to
receive input
on the highest
priority
housing,
community
and economic
development
needs in
Victorville. This
meeting took
place prior to
the publication
of the draft
2022-2026
Consolidated
Plan
for public
review and
comment.
12 verbal
and two
written
comments
were
delivered. 11
comments
were in
support of
CDBG
public
services
application
submitted
and one was
identifying
the need for
affordable
housing.
Not
applicable.
All
comments
were
accepted.
Not applicable.
7 Newspape
r Ad
Non-targeted/
broad
community
Newspaper ad
published on
March 21 2022
in the Daily
Press
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 43
Needs Assessment
NA-05 OVERVIEW
Needs Assessment Overview
The Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment examines housing, homelessness, non - homeless special needs, and non- housing community development needs. The housing needs assessment section evaluates household income, tenure (renter or owner), housing cost as a function of household income, disproportionate need amongst racial and ethnic groups and public housing needs. The homeless needs assessment examines the sheltered and unsheltered homeless population in San Bernardino County to inform Apple Valley -Victorville’s strategy to address homelessness during the next five years. The non-homeless special needs assessment section evaluates the needs of people who are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services. This population includes elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, and physically disabled persons, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of human trafficking, persons with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and victims of domestic violence. The non- housing community development needs assessment section discusses the need for public facilities, public infrastructure improvements and public services to benefit low- and moderate-income residents.
Methodology
To assess community needs, the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville examined data, held community meetings and focus groups, conducted a survey of residents and stakeholders, and consulted with experts and local stakeholders. The Needs Assessment primarily relies on the following sources of data:
• American Community Survey (ACS), 2013-2017, 5-year estimates • Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2013 -2017, 5 -year estimates
• 2020 Point-In-Time Homeless Count
The 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates and the 2013-2017, 5-year estimates were the most recent available complete datasets supplied through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Con Planning Suite planning framework.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 44
Consolidated Plan Focus Groups and Surveys for Residents and Stakeholders
The Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium held five virtual focus groups over the period of three days in mid -December 2021. The focus groups were promoted by the cities and facilitated by MDG. The five groups were as follows:
1. Food Banks and Homeless Services,
2. Education and Youth Services,
3. Public Services,
4. Veterans, Elderly and Disabled Services, and
5. Faith Based Organizations.
Some organizations participated in multiple focus groups because they serve multiple constituencies. In total, 29 unique people participated in the focus groups, excluding the facilitator and organizers.
Apple Valley and Victorville residents and stakehol ders had the opportunity to respond to the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan survey to rate the need and/or to identify highest priority need for public facilities, infrastructure, and services, housing facilities and services, business services. The tabulation of survey results from the 111 Apple Valley and 25 Victorville residents and four community stakeholders who responded to the surveys are integrated throughout the Needs Assessment (NA) and Market Assessment (MA) of Consolidated Plan and can be found in the following sections:
• Housing facility and service results – NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment, • Public facility, infrastructure, and service results – NA-50 Non -Housing and Community Development Needs,
• Discrimination in housing results – MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing, • Business service results – MA-45,
• Internet access, cost, type, and speed – MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing Occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households, and
• Disaster preparedness results – MA-65 Hazard Mitigation.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 45
NA-10 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Summary of Housing Needs
For the City of Victorville, the income levels are divided by different AMI levels corresponding with HUD income definitions as follows:
• 0-30 percent AMI: extremely low-income – just over 16 percent of all households; • 30-50 percent AMI: low-income – almost 15 percent of all households; • 50-80 percent AMI: moderate-income – just over 18 percent of all households; • 80-100 percent AMI: medium -income – approximately 10 percent of all households; and
• Greater than 10 0 percent AMI: upper- income – about 40 percent of all households.
The most common household type in Victorville is small family. About 49 percent of specific household types earn less than 80 percent AMI, with the highest rates of occurrence among households with one or more children 6 years of age or younger or 62 years of age or older.
Figure 1
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
According to ACS data in Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics - Victorville, Victorville’s population grew by 19 percent during the period between 2009 and 2017, increasing in number from 102,666 to 121,720 people. During this time, the number of households increased by 13 percent from 28,842 to 32,630 and the median
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 47
Figure 2: Households with extremely low-income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 48
Figure 3: Households with low-income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 49
Figure 4: Households with moderate income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 50
Figure 5: Population Asian alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 51
Figure 6: Population Black/ African American alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 52
Figure 7: Population Hispanic origin (any race)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 53
Figure 8: Population White alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 54
NA-50 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities.
The City of Victorville was incorporated in 1962. It has grown from 8,110 residents in an area of 9.7 acres to over 128,000 residents in 74.16 acres. It has evolved and experienced significant growth in population and economic activity since incorporation. While new facilities and amenities continue to be added, older facilities require rehabilitation to address the changing needs of the community.
The City of Victorville has invested significan tly in community facilities. According to the City’s website, it provides a library, golf course, two activity, two community, and a sport center and 18 parks. Maintaining and expanding these amenities requires significant financial investment.
Responses to the Resident and Stakeholder Surveys and focus groups give insight into the needs and priorities of those who live and work in Victorville. Residents responded there is a high level of need and the highest priority for homeless facilities and youth centers. In focus groups private facilities offering youth and family programming, such as a YMCA, and a performing arts center were identified as needs.
CDBG public facility projects that meet CDBG eligibility requirements, align with a Strategic Plan goal and address a CDBG National Objective will be considered for funding in the five Annual Action Plans. The Strategic Plan includes a goal to improve public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low - and moderate-income people or those presumed under HUD reg ulations to be low - and moderate-income, such as elderly people and adults with disabilities . Some of the types of facilities and infrastructure that may require rehabilitation during the next five years include, but are not limited to community centers, senior centers, parks and recreational facilities.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 55
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified for public facilities were determined through Community Meetings, responses from the Consolidated Plan Survey and consultation with City officials. Over the next five years Victorville’s Strategic Plan will continue to prioritize additional or improved public facilities to enhance or maintain the high level of services and amenities available to residents.
Figure 9: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 56
Figure 10: Resident Survey
Figure 11: Stakeholder Survey
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements.
Infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, storm drains, sewers, driveway approaches, pedestrian crossing, and streetlights in CDBD target areas or to support a project that benefits an identifiable segment of the population comprised of low - and moderate-income residents or residents presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income must be developed and maintained. Infrastructure improvements are included as part of the Strategic Plan goal concerning City of Victorville Public Facilities Improvements should the need arise to modify existing infrastructure or install new infrastructure.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 57
Responses to the Resident Survey show public infrastructure improvements to streets/ alleys, drainage, and high-speed internet infrastructure represent the greatest combined high and moderate levels of need. The highest priority infrastructure improvements are high- speed internet, street lighting, street/ alley improvements and tree planting.
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified fo r public infrastructure improvements were determined in consultation with the City and Town residents, City of Victorville Public Works Departments, Community Services Departments, and affordable housing developers.
Figure 12: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 58
Figure 13: Resident Survey
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services.
1. Those in need of public services are diverse and numerous. The homeless and non-homeless special needs populations are described in the Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment sections 40 and 45. Focus group s with nonprofit service providers shed light on the current and daily challenges faced by homeless and non- homeless special needs populations in Apple Valley and Victorville. Most focus group participants believed the priority needs facing their community are as follows:Supportive services for the homeless and those as risk of homelessness,
2. Human services, and
3. Accessibility and mobility.
Participants shared the types of prog ramming they believed would most effectively address those needs as well as the gaps in homeless and youth services delivery systems. A handful of programming areas were identified across the focus groups.
Those areas are as follows:
1. Mental and behavioral health services, especially for children
2. Community support for youth and families in the form of youth programming, in the arts, the consequences of underage substance use, and positive attitudes and behaviors to prevent violence
3. Transportation, including paved roads and sidewalks and electric bike share
4. Education on public services and changing eligibility, service providers and resources available to service providers. Throughout the focus groups there was a recurring theme around the need for centralizat ion and formalization of networks.
The input from the focus groups is supported by the resident and stakeholder survey results. The top three highly and moderately needed public services and highest priority public services as indicated in the Resident Su rvey are the same: homeless,
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 59
mental health, and youth services. Mental health services and homeless emergency shelter were identified as the top two highest needed public services by the stakeholder survey.
How were these needs determined?
Public service needs are driven by the City’s desire to ensure high quality services are provided to maintain residents’ quality of life and to promote the well- being of all residents — particularly low- and moderate -income residents including youth, seniors, and people with special needs. These needs were determined based on contributions from focus groups, and resident and stakeholder surveys.
The Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium held five virtual focus groups over the period of three days in mid -December 2021. The focus groups were promoted by the cities and facilitated by MDG. The five groups were as follows:
1. Food Banks and Homeless Services,
2. Education and Youth Services,
3. Public Services,
4. Veterans, Elderly and Disabled Services, and
5. Faith Based Organizations.
These groups spoke directly to the need for specific services and the needs of homeless and non- homeless special needs populations. Some organizations participated in multiple focus groups because they serve multiple constituencies. In total, 29 unique people participated in the focus groups, excluding the facilitator and organizers.
Responses to the Resident Survey are presented in Figures 7, 8 and 9. As a result of the citizen participation and consultation process and in consideration of the local nonprofits the City of Victorville considers public services benefitting low - and moderate-income residents a high priority in their respective Strategic Plans.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 60
Figure 14: Resident Survey
Figure 15: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 61
Figure 16: Stakeholder Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 62
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 OVERVIEW
Housing Market Analysis Overview
This section of the Consolidated Plan evaluates housing market conditions in the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville independently as well as the Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium as a whole. The analysis includes housing supply, demand, condition, and cost. Apple Valley’s housing stock primarily consists of single -family detached residential dwellings (76 percent) and three -bedroom units (71 percent).
Victorville’s housing stock primarily consists of single -family detached residential dwellings (79 percent) and three-bedroom units (79 percent).
From December 2017 to December 2021, median home value in Apple Valley increased 53 percent from $ 252,000 to $ 386,000, and the median home value in Victorville increase 59 percent from $246,000 to $391,000, according to Zillow Home Value Index. As of 2017, the most common rental unit size in Apple Valley was two- bedrooms and in Victorville was three -bedrooms. During the December 2017 to December 2021 period, median monthly rent for a two-bedroom unit in Apple Valley increased 55 percent from $ 896 to $1,385, and the median monthl y rent for three - bedroom unit in Victorville increased 42 percent from $1,299 to $1,850, as reported by Zumper, a rental listing aggregator . As a result, Apple Valley and Victorville households have become increasingly cost-burdened. Data from 2013-2017 shows an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 80 percent of AMI.
Tables 10 and 11 of the Needs Assessment section of the Consolidate d Plan show 74 percent of households (19,649 households) in the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium earning 0-80 percent of AMI, are cost burdened— meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing — and 9,515 (41 percent) households are considered severely cost burdened, meaning they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Of the severely cost burdened households earning 0-80 percent of AMI , more than two thirds are renters. Of those severely cost burdened renter households, 94 percent (6,255 households) earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 63
Figure 17
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Five year estimates from the ACS and CHAS were evaluated to determine if a geographic concentration of housing problems, racial and ethnic minorities, and low- income households exist in the Victorville. The spatial units under consideration are census tracts. A concentration is defined as ten percent over the rate at which any of the circumstances identified above occur throughout the City as a whole. The thresholds are as follows:
• Low-income households 59.7 percent,
• One or more housing problem 39.2 percent, and
• Racial and ethnic minorities 82.6 percent
As seen in the concentration maps in the section there are multiple census tracts which exceed the thresholds identified above. Notably there are two census tract which exceed all three thresholds.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 64
Figure 18: Concentration of households with low-income
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 65
Figure 19: Concentration of households with multiple housing problems
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 66
Figure 20: Concentration of racial and ethnic minorities
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 70
affordable housing stock, they may consider preserving the existing assisted units or facilitating the development of new units. Each negotiation to pre serve affordable units is unique in the sense that each project’s ownership interests, and economic needs will vary, and the jurisdiction’s resources may be insufficient to preserve all expiring units. Depending on the circumstances of each project that includes at- risk units, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? The current availability of housing units in the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium does not meet the needs of the population. The re is a significant need for additional rental housing units — particularly zero, one-bedroom units, and those affordable to households earning less than 50 percent of AMI. According to the data discussed in the Needs Assessment, the most common housing problems in the Consortium are cost burden and overcrowding. There are 6,255 renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI that are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs (Table 11). Overcrowding, having more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, hal ls, or half -rooms, impacts 2,148 low- and moderate -income households in the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium, almost 76 percent of whom are renters (Table 12).
Describe the need for specific types of housing.
Of the 2,150 renter households in the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium who earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs:
• 3,305 are small, related households with four or fewer members • 1,135 are large, related households with five or more members • 880 are elderly households with one or more members over age 62 • 935 are other/single person households
This breakdown by tenure, income, cost burden and household type indicate a need for additional affordable zero - and one -bedroom rental units in the Apple Valley - Victorville Consortium.
Discussion
For decades, California’s housing market has been among the most expensive in the country, and those conditions persist in 2021 . Renting can take up a considerable amount of income, while purchasing a home may be out of reach for individuals. To afford median rent for a three -bedroom unit as of December 2021, a Victorville household needs to earn $38.54 per hour or work 119 hours pe r week at minimum wage of $13 per hour, which equates to about three full time jobs. These calculations were made using the same method as the National Low-Income Housing Coalition in
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 71
the Out if Reach series and using median rents from Zumper a rental list ing aggregator. Median rents are far greater than fair market rents and more accurately reflect the experience low- and moderate-income households are facing.
Figure 23
Data Source: 2021 Zumper Research (accessed 2/4/2022) and State of CA Minimum Wage Data
As noted in the City of Victorville’s 2021-2029 Housing Element, it is the City’s goal to encourage development of different housing types to meet the City’s different needs.
Over the next eight years the City will strive to meet the following housing goals:
• Maximize land utilization for residential development, • Preserve existing housing stock,
• Encourage more affordable housing units,
• Maximize solution for those experiencing or at risk of homelessness, • Encourage homeownership,
• Improve quality of life and promote placemaking, and
• Affirmatively further fair housing.
Through these efforts, the City will strive to maintain a healthy community that encourages family stability and economic growth.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 72
MA-15 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: COST OF HOUSING
Introduction
One of the most important factors in evaluating a community’s housing market is the cost of housing and whether the housing is affordable to households who live there or would like to live there. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to household income, a correspondingly high prevalence of housing cost burden and overcrowding will typically occur.
Table 11 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates – and Table 12 – Cost of Housing – indicate the median home value and contract rent (not including utility or other assoc iated costs). These values are self-reported by residents through the U.S. Census American Community Survey. However, in looking at more current housing sales and rental market data – the cost of housing has risen tremendously over the past five years.
According to Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, median rents for two- and three- bedroom units have increased from December 2017 to 2021. The 2017 average rents reported by Zumper significantly exceeded the median contract rent as reported by the ACS 2013-2017 estimates in the Cost of Housing table below.
Figure 24
Data Source: 2017-2021 Zumper Research (accessed 2/4/2022) Median home values have increased significantly since the last Consolidated Planning process. In 2017, according to ACS data, median home values in Victorville were d 31 percent below what they had been in 2009, prior to the mortgage -backed securities housing foreclosure crisis. By 2019, according to the same source, housing prices had still not rebounded to 2009 levels. According to the Zillow Home Value Index housing values increased 59 percent in Victorville from December 2017 to 2021, from $483,000 to $676,000, according to the Zillow Home Value Index. Based on this more current data, home values have exceeded 2009 amounts.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 74
to households earning at or below 30, 50, 80 and 100 percent of AMI and 2013-2017 ACS data on household income.
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents?
Rental housing costs have increased steadily over the past five years – creating more pressure on extremely low -income households. According from Zumper (Table 11 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates ), a rental listing aggregator, average rents for a two- bedroom unit in Victorville increased from $838 to $1,455 on average, an increase of 74 percent and three-bedroom rents increased from $1,299 to $1,850 an increase of 42 percent over the last five years. These rents represent a significant burden for low- and moderate-income households struggling to remain housed. Home values increased significantly as well. In Victorville, from December 2017 to 2021 according to sales data supplied by Zillow (Figure 15), home values increase from $246,000 to $391,000, a rate of 59 percent. Based on this information and barring significant regional and national changes in economic conditions, the price of housing in Victorville is forecast to continue increasing during the period of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?
HOME rents, Fair Market rents, and Market rents were compared to median contract rents from 2019 to determine the financial impact on operating income. To produce or preserve affordable rental housing units that carry a minimum HOME affordability period of 20 years, significant levels of subsidy are required.
For Victorville the low HOME and market rate rent closest to the median contract rent was for four - and two-bedroom units. The foregone rent over a 20 -year period for a four-bedroom unit at low HOME rates was $5,040. The foregone rent over a 20 -year period for a two -bedroom unit at market rate was $14,160. Notably, a quarter of occupied rental units in the Town are two -bedroom and nine percent are one - bedroom and efficiency units. The high concentration of larger rental units may drive up the median rental contract and drive down the rental rate per square foot.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 75
Figure 26
Data Source: 2019 ACS, HUD Fair Market Rent 2019, 2019 Zumper Research,
Discussion
Economic expansion over the last decade and a lag in production of new housing units in Southern California have created a housing economy that is over -burdened.
As a result, Apple Valley and Victorville households have become increasingly cost - burdened. Data from 201 3-2017 shows an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 50 percent of AMI. Considering the scarcity of land and monetary resources available to create new affordable housing units, housing affordability is expected to remain a significant challenge in the next five years.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 76
MA-45 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ASSETS
Introduction
Non-housing community development needs includ e economic development and improvements to public facilities . Special economic development activities must meet a National Object ive by addressing low - or moderate-income residents, slum/ blight, or urgent need and be an eligible activity per 24 CFR 570.203. Public facilities assisted with CDBG must serve low - and moderate -income residents or those residents presumed by HUD to be low- and moderate-income. Such facilities include senior centers, community centers, facilities for victims of domestic violence, facilities for treatment of persons with HIV/AID S, and ADA improvements to public facilities throughout the City. During the implementation of the 2022 -2026 Strategic Plan, Victorville will use CDBG funds to develop the local economy and address these needs and provide a suitable living environment for low- and moderate-income people.
To expand economic opportunities for low - and moderate -income people and provide a pathway out of poverty, the Strategic Plan and the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan includes public services. These projects include getting clothing to school aged children, homeless shelter operations, providing behavioral health care to foster youth and their foster families, and exercise, cooking, and art classes for people with special needs.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 80
Figure 27
Data Source: 2015-2020 County Employment by Industry CA EDD
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community
The business community in Victorville relies largely on a skilled workforce. Residents of Victorville identified employment training as the greatest need and highest priority in the city. Employers across all sectors, and especially those for which Victorville is a destination location or part of a larger logistics chain such as arts, entertainment and accommodations and manufacturing, require a well -functioning transportation system.
Figure 28: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 81
Figure 29: Resident Survey
Figure 30: Stakeholder Survey
Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.
The coronavirus pandemic has had a major and sustained impact on all sectors of the economy. It has both highlighted and increased the need for fast, reliable, and secure internet has increased across all sectors of the economy.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 82
In response to the COVID -19 pandemic, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Act authorized $.2.2 trillion to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID -19 pandemic. The City of Vi ctorville received $1,527,782 in CARES Act CDBG funds. These funds assisted households to make emergency rent, mortgage, and utility payments and to help small businesses prepare and respond to the virus.
Additionally, the City of Victorville received $33 ,500,000 in Federal American Rescue Plan Act funds. The first tranche of 16.75 million was received in June 2021 and the second tranche will be released in June 2022. City staff identified the following eligible activities and funding for each one:
Housing and Homelessness - $6 Million
o Outreach Programs
o Wellness Center Facility
Community Improvements - $9 Million
o Utility Assistance Program
o Self-Cleaning Restrooms
o Improve Public Facilities
Broadband - $8 Million
o WiFi at Victorville Parks and Community Centers
o New Infrastructure
Community & Small Business Recovery - $4 Million
o Hiring Bonuses
o Hazard Pay for Essential Workers
Water/Sewer/Storm Drain - $6 Million
o Water Well Maintenance/Repairs
o Reservoir Refurbishment
The first implemented program using ARPA funds was the City’s Past Due Utility Program, which assisted residents with their past due water bills. For 2022-2023 ARPA funds will be used to funds utility assistance programs, rental and mortgage assistance programs and food banks administered by non-profit organizations.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 83
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
Most employees in Victorville’s civilian labor force have some post-secondary education, almost 42 percent of the employed labor force has some college or Associates degree . Generally . T he skills and education of the current workforce correspond to the employment opportunities in Victor ville; however, the jobs and opportunities do not correspond to the number of available workers . In 2017, there were only two employment sectors where there were more jobs than workers. More than half the working population in Victorville travel more than half an hour to work.
Figure 31
Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.
The San Bernardino County Workforce Development Board provides strategic direction and relationships for the WDC. San Bernardino County Workforce Development Centers (WDC) are the primary source of workforce training available to residents of Victorville. The WDC is operated by America’s Job Centers of California.
The City of Victorville work with the San Bernardino County WCD and employers to secure on-the-job training when appropriate.
Victor Valley College (VVC) is a p ublic community college located in Victorville and serving Victorville, Hesperia, Apple Valley, Phelan and Adelanto. It is part of the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 84
California Community College System. VVC offers over Certificates in over 100 vocational subjects. The College is an important partner in educating and training the local workforce.
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy?
Yes, the City of Victorville participated in development of the San Bernardino County 2019 CEDS.
If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.
The City of Victorville’s CDBG program will support local economic growth by meeting extremely low-, low- and moderate-income and homeless residents where they are to improve quality of life and better position for access and engagement in economic opportunities. This will be achieved by supporting local nonprofit ser vice providers, including housing services, and support of the development and preservation of affordable housing.
Discussion
The highly contagious nature of COVID-19 and the scale of illness and death has had significant ripple effects on the economy. In the spring of 2020, unemployment rates in the United States reached the highest levels since the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) began recording this data. According to the BLS, unemployment rates peaked at 14.2 percent in San Bernardino County and 17 percent in Victorville in April 2020. Those rates have fallen to 5.2 and 8.2 percent, respectively, as of December 2021, unemployment is still above pre -pandemic levels. Health and safety guidelines and requirements continue to change as the co ronavirus evolves and the scientific community learns more about the virus. Employers and workers are required to constantly learn and reevaluate changing situations.
Another indication of the negative economic impact of the pandemic is the year over year decrease in California of personal consumption expenditures of over four percent from 2019 to 2020, as calculated by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). The BEA calculated San Bernardino County’s gross domestic product which inc rease from $96.7 million in 2019 to $97 million in 2020.
State level calculations, which are more current, show the negative economic impact cause by the pandemic. According to the BEA, in 2020, California GPD fell for the first time in ten years.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 85
MA-60 BROADBAND NEEDS OF HOUSING OCCUPIED
BY LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods.
Broadbandnow.com is a widely used source of information about internet availability throughout the county and reports Victorville residents have several options for broadband internet service. According to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) three percent of consumers only have access to one or fewer wired internet providers at their address and the average download speed is almost 194 megabits per second (mbps). The responses to the Resident Survey show a relatively low rate of connectivity given the FCC data. This could be due to the small sample size of the survey.
Figure 32:Resident Survey
Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.
According to the FCC, 97 percent of Victorville has access to at least two wired internet providers at their address. Throughout the City , residents are serviced by multiple internet service providers who offer high speed internet. Providers include, Spectrum, Viasat, HughesNet, Frontier Communications, T -Mobile, and Ultra. According to the Resident Survey, most pay $50 to $100 per month for internet service provided by Spectrum or Frontier.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 86
Figure 33:Resident Survey
Figure 34: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 87
MA-65 HAZARD MITIGATION, VICTORVILLE
Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change.
The City of Victorville’s Hazard Mitigation Plan has been approved by Cal OES, FEMA, and City Council. The Plan is based on extensive research and community engagement and intended to mitigate the effects of natural disasters and return to “the norm” soone r, while also building back better so the community is more advantageously positioned for future disasters. Such planning is required by FEMA to receive federal disaster mitigation funds.
Through multivariate analysis Victorville’s risks were quantified and ranked. Across 13 hazards, four were ranked as high. From greatest to least those risks are Earthquake/ Seismic, Flash Flood, Climate Change, Dam Inundation, Drought, Power Failure/ PSPS, Terrorism, Pandemic, Pipeline Rupture HAZMAT Release, Extreme Heat, High Winds/ Severe Storm, Aviation Accident, Fire/ Wildfire.
Victorville’s mitigation goals are as follows:
• Goal 1: Protect life, property, and reduce potential injuries from natural, technological, and human- caused hazards, including catastrophic threats posed by the DWR owned Cedar Springs Dam and the USACE owned Mohave Forks Dam which are high hazard dams and a major earthquake hazard. • Goal 2: Improve public understanding of and support for the need for hazard mitigation measures.
• Goal 3: Promote disaster resistance for Victorville’s natural, existing, and future built environment.
• Goal 4: Strengthen partnerships and collaboration to implement hazard mitigation activities.
• Goal 5: Enhance the City’s ability to effectively and immediately respond to disasters.
Describe the vulnerability of housing occupied by low- and moderate- income households to these risks.
Most of the respondents to the Resident Survey feel somewhat prepared for a disaster (Figure 25: Resident Survey.). Low- and moderate-income residents and special needs populations are especially vulnerable to the risks of c limate-related hazards. The residences of low - and moderate -income households are more often in worse condition and thus are more susceptible to external weather conditions such as extreme heat. Likewise, elderly residents are at a greater risk during extreme weather events such as extreme heat events.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 88
Figure 35: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 89
Strategic Plan
SP-05 OVERVIEW
The Strategic Plan is a guide for the City of Victorville to establish its housing, community and economic development priorities, strategies, and goals for the investment of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from HUD over the next five years, beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2026. The priority needs and goals established in this Strategic Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City’s 2022 Resident and Stakeholder Surveys, focus groups, and housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite) from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same period. Additional sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies involved in the development of affordable housing and the delivery of public services to low - and moderate -income people, persons with special needs and those at risk of homelessness.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Strategic Plan.
• Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Human services
• Housing programs
• Accessibility and mobility
• Economic Development
Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG and HOME programs to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG- and HOME -funded activities aligned with the following nine measurable Strategic Plan goals as elaborated in Section SP-45:
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 91
SP-10 GEOGRAPHIC PRIORITIES
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)
According to data from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates in HUD’s eCon Planning Suite for the Consolidated Plan, the City's household median income is $ 47,895. Evaluation of maps generated through HUD's Community Planning and Development mapp ing system (CPD Maps) reveals one Census Tract, the majority of which falls outside of the City limits, where the median income is less than 50 percent of AMI, it is above 50 percent of AMI in the remaining census tracts.
HUD allows CDBG grantees to implement certain activities such as initial construction or expansion of community facilities and infrastructure that benefit certain neighborhoods or villages (but not the entire City) provided the entire service area for the facility or infrastructure is pri marily residential and where at least 51 percent of residents are low- and moderate-income. In the majority of Census Tracts in Victorville over 51 percent of residents earn less than 80 percent of AMI. According to CPD maps, there are five Census tracts (98.00, 99.04, 99.05, 99.12, and 99.13) within Victorville City limits where over 49 percent of household incomes exceed 80 percent of AMI.
The Consortia will use a place-based strategy to distribute funding. It is the Consortia’s intent to fund construction activities in the areas most directly affected by the needs of low-income residents and those with other special needs. Where appropriate the Annual Action Plan will direct investment geographically to an area benefit neighborhood. The area benefit cate gory is the most used national objective for activities benefitting a residential neighborhood. An area benefit activity is one that benefits all residents, where at least 51 percent are low- and moderate-income. Public infrastructure improvements are an area benefit activity when they are in a predominantly low- and moderate-income neighborhood.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 93
Elderly; Frail Elderly; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Persons with Physical Disabilities; Persons with Developmental Disabilities; Persons with Alcohol of Other Addictions; Persons with HIV/ AIDS and their Families; Victims of DV; Non -Housing Community Development
Geographic
Areas Citywide
Associated
Goals
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Description The City of Victorville holds this as a high priority and will support CDBG public service activities which help support individuals and families with individual and group development. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with
contributions from the private sector.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
The City of Victorville’s Strategic Plan for calls for a range of services for low - and moderate -income residents and those with special needs as a high priority. The top four highly needed and highest priority public services, excluding homeless services, according to the 2022 Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, are as follows: mental health, youth services, and services for abused and neglected children. The need for public services will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with contributions from the private sector. These results were echoed by participants in five focus groups: homeless services and food banks, education and youth services, public services, veterans, elderly and disabled services, and faith-based organizations.
Throughout San Bernardino County, including Victorville, maintaining mental health, and appropriate services for youth including abandoned and neglected children is a high priority. - Nearly 17 percent of San Bernardino Count y residents had mental illness in 2017, and only about eight percent received mental health services, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
- population, including ch ildren will have PTSD at some point in their lives. Applying those rates to the 121, 000 residents of the Victorville, approximately 7,303 suffer from PTSD.
- In Victorville children under the age of six are present in 4,890 households with incomes below 80 percent of AMI.
The National Center reports an estimated six percent of the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 96
Table 21 – Priority Needs Summary
Narrative (Optional)
The City will incorporate the above goals along with specific needs identified through community engagement in considering funding applications f or each of its five Action Plans covered by the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
Pursuant to CDBG regulations, all projects must meet one of three national objectives set forth by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): (1) Benefit low- and moderate-income households, (2) Aid in the elimination/ prevention of slum and blight, or (3) Meet and urgent need (catastrophic events). Pursuant to HOME regulations, HOME funds are specifically focused on affordable housing activities and may be used to develop and support affordable rental housing and homeownership opportunities. Recommended project for funding should be Geographic
Areas
Citywide;
Associated
Goals
Expand access to essential services and amenities; Economic Development
Description Develop and support efforts to improve mobility in the community; identify and remove barriers that impede accessibility; support transit systems, mass and specialized, that enable residents to access destination for employment, edu cation, and other essential purposes; support collaborative efforts to improve community and regional transit.
Economic Development activities will include commercial rehabilitation, which includes exterior improvements and code compliance; micro-enterprise development to include training and technical assistance and other support services to increase the capacity of grantees to carry out microenterprise activities; water and sewer projects.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
Focus group participants voiced the need for improved mobility within the city and access to points beyond the city.
Based on the results of the Consolidated Plan Resident Survey and input from community workshops and consultations, the City of Victorville places a low priority on employment training and loans/ grants to small businesses owned and operated by low - and moderate-income residents as a pathway out of poverty. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with contributions from the private sector.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 97
consistent with addressing the needs identified, and priority strategies developed, in each five-year Consolidated Plan.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 99
Depending on the financing structure of a given activity, it may be advantageous for the City to use CDBG funds to leverage appropriate state, local and private resources, including but not limited to those listed below.
Federal Resources
• American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
• Continuum of Care (CoC) Program
• HUD Veterans Affairs supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
• Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202)
• Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
• Youthbuild
• Federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
State Resources
• State Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
• Homekey
• Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • CalHome Program
• Multifamily Housing Program (MHP)
• Housing Related Parks Grant
• CalHFA Single and Multi-Family Program
• Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding
Local Resources
• San Bernardino County CoC
• Housing Authority of San Bernardino County (HASBC)
• Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA)
• City of Victorville General Fund
Private Resources
• Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program Community Reinvestment Act Programs United Way Funding Private Contributions
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 100
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Over the past year, City staff has been pursuing the development of a navigation center campus, called the “Wellness Center,” to be located at 16902 First Street, a City owned property, in accordance with City Council direction at the August 18, 2020, meeting to continue with the land use entitlement process and securing of funding for the project.
Discussion
Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG program, the City expects to spend approximately $ 7,238,700 of CDBG funds on housing, community development, public facilities, infrastructure and neighborhood services activities that promote a suitable living environment between July 20 22 and June 2026. It is anticipated that approximately $4.7 million of this will be spent on construction and housing projects and that $1 million will be spent on public services. Anticipated projects include:
• Housing rehab,
• Public Facilities Improvements (including fire suppression.), and • Public Services.
Assuming the continued funding level of the CDBG program, the City may allocate CDBG funds for economic opportunity activities to support the development and expansion of local small businesses during this next Consolidated Planning cycle through its Office of Economic Development with its microenterprise assistance program.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 103
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)
The City of Victorville works jointly with the Town of Apple Valley as a consortium to provide housing to their jurisdictions. Together, they participate in the San Bernardino County’s Continuum of Care (COC), which provides funding and a network of resources for homeless abatement. The COC provides emergency shelter, supportive services, transitional and permanent housing. Victorville commits s taff to the COC planning and implementation process and provides the COC Steering Committee critical information regarding the types of resources and programs Victorville currently funds to assist the homeless.
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above.
The Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium has a long track record of successful partnerships among public and pri vate sector entities. The delivery system for the HUD grant program is no exception. Communication and cooperation is strong between the Consortium the San Bernardino County Homeless Coalition, including partner agencies, and the Housing Authority of the C ounty of San Bernardino . City staff continues to work closely with the other organizations to improve regulatory compliance, monitoring, cooperation and partnerships among agencies and technical capacity of organizations involved in project delivery.
The s ingle most significant gap in the service delivery system remains the lack of available funding to support local programs in Victorville and the Consortium for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness. In Victorville, this funding is limited to 15 percent of the annual allocation of CDBG funds. The City is not a direct recipient of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds; therefore, most of the HUD funding to address homelessness is available through the San Bernardino County Continuum of Care. State funding has been reduced with several years of fiscal challenges for the State of California and City funds for this purpose are limited. It has been difficult to accommodate increasing levels of need in the community and increases in the cost of providing services to homeless and special needs populations.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 104
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs.
To address the lack of resources necessary to fully address the needs of special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, the City continues to work with its nonprofit service providers to explore alternate funding sources and encourages the identification of alternate revenue streams.
The City of Victorville is undertaking several initiatives to address homelessness and housing instability. In December 2021, the City announced it was awarded a $28 million Homekey award from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the construction and operational support of its Wellness Center Campus. The campus is a critical component of the City’s strategy to reduce homelessness. Combining a low-barrier emergency shelter, recuperative care facility, medical clinic, interim housing, and wraparound support services. Construction is expected to begin in 2022.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 107
SP-65 LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards.
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. This strategy requires the City to implement programs that protect children living in older housing from lead hazards.
Overall, the City has a relatively new housing stock . Therefore, lead -based paint hazards are not an extensive issue in Victorville. According to ACS data, about 79 percent Victorville’s housing stock was built after 1979, when the use of lead -based paint was outlawed, meaning that the residents of these homes should not be at risk of lead-based paint hazards. Only those units constructed prior to January 1, 1978, are presumed to have the potential to contain lead- based paint. In these units, the best way to have reasonable assurance that lead-based paint hazards are not present is to have the painted surfaces tested.
According to the City of Victorville Residential Rehabilitation Program, a typical lead- based paint screening survey costs approximately $5 00 to $1,000 . To reduce lead - based paint hazards, the City of Victorville takes the following actions:
• Include lead testing and abatement procedures, as required, in all residential rehabilitation activities falling under Strategic Plan Goal No. 2 for units built prior to January 1, 1978.
• Educate residents on the health hazards of lead-based paint through brochures and encourage screening children for elevated blood-lead levels. • Disseminate brochures about lead hazards through organizations such as the Inland Fair Housing Council and the City’s residential rehabilitation activities.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards?
Over time through testing and abatement, monitoring of public health data, and through public education, the public will have greater awareness of the hazards of lead-based paint to children. This will prompt homeowners, landlords, and parents of young children to proactively address unsafe housing conditions in pre -1978 units where children may potentially be exposed to lead-based paint hazards.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 108
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?
In accordance with federal regulation the Town of Apple Valley and the City of Victorville have established policies regarding the identification of lead -based paint (LBP) hazards. Housing build prior to 1978 must undergo lead- based paint testing prior receiving funding for rehabilitation. If deteriorated lead-based paint surfaces are found, they must be stabilized during the rehabilitation of the property. Abatement must be performed by a certified lead- based paint assessor prior to the issuance of the Notice of Completion. The Cons ortia will continue to maintain policies and procedures to increase assess to housing without LBP hazards. CDBG and HOME funding is not provided until it is determined properties are free of LBP hazards.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 109
SP-70 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY
Jurisdiction Goals, Prog rams and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families.
Poverty continues to be a significant challenge in Victorville and the Consortium .
According to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, there are 26,480 Victorville residents living below the poverty level. Of these residents, 9.479, over a quarter, are children under the age of 18.
To meaningfully address this challenge, each of the goals included in the 2022 -2026 Strategic Plan is aligned to support activities promoting the availability of affordable housing and provide essential services that directly benefit low - and moderate - income residents. In the implementation of the Strategic Plan, the City will prioritize funding for activities that most effectively address these goals over the next five years.
This strategy will emphasize using CDBG funds to help individuals and families rise out of poverty to long-term self-sufficiency.
The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in this Strategic Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty-level families by:
• Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness.
• Supporting expansion of housing affordable to low - and moderate -income households through development of new and preservation of existing housing. • Supporting public services for low - and moderate-income residents including the elderly, veterans, those with special needs and those at -risk of homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG funds; and • Support access to services, employment center, and amenities and mobility within the city and to surrounding areas.
• Promoting economic opportunity for low - and moderate -income residents through workforce training and small business assistance.
In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide a pathway out of pove rty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. In California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CalWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare, and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing,
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 110
nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence, and mental illness.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan?
Victorville’s Strategic Plan goals are aligned to benefit low - and moderate -income residents and to reduce the number of poverty-level families. For example, the goal of decent and affordable housing for families earning less than 30, 50 and 80 percent of AMI will preserve and provide additional affordable housing options for families transitioning from activities funded under the Homelessness Services goal. It will also include activities targeted to families who own their residence but lack the resources to address emergency repairs or maintain the property in compliance with City codes and standards. Addressing substandard or emergency housing conditions allows low- and moderate-income families to maintain housing stability while also guaranteeing that all economic segments of the community live in decent housing . The goal to provide suitable living environments will include funding for activities targeted to families in poverty and other low - and moderate -income households with specific service needs. Providing this range of targeted services allows children, families, seniors, and re sidents with special needs in Victorville appropriate support and resources to thrive.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 111
SP-80 MONITORING
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
To ensure CDBG funds are used efficiently and in compliance with applicable regulations, the City provides technical assistance to all subrecipients at the beginning of each program year and monitors subrecipients throughout the program year.
Technical Assistance
To enhance compliance with federal program regulations, the City provides an annual Notice of F unding Availability workshop to review the Annual Action Plan goals, program requirements and available resources with potential applicants. After the Action Plan is approved, a mandatory subrecipient workshop is held to review program regulations in detail, to provide useful forms and resources for documenting compliance and to review the City’s compliance procedures and requirements.
Additionally, individualized technical assistance is provided on an as -needed basis throughout a program year.
Activity Monitoring
All activities are monitored, beginning with a detailed review upon receipt of an application to determine eligibility, conformance with a National Objective and conformance with a Plan goal. This review also examines the proposed use of funds, eligibility of the service area, eligibility of the intended beneficiaries and likelihood of compliance with other federal requirements such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the System for Award Management (SAM) debarment list, prevailing wage, Minority and Women Business Enterprise, Section 3 and federal acquisition and relocation regulations, as applicable.
Subrecipients are required to submit an audit and other documentation to establish their capacity, and any findings noted in the audit are revie wed with the applicant.
Eligible applications are then considered for funding. Once funded, desk monitoring includes ongoing review of required quarterly performance reports. For CDBG public service activities, an on-site monitoring is conducted at least once every two years or yearly, or more frequently as needed to ensure compliance. These reviews include both a fiscal and programmatic review of the subrecipient’s activities. The reviews
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 112
determine if the subrecipient is complying with the program regulati ons and City contract. Areas routinely reviewed include overall administration, financial systems, appropriateness of program expenditures, program delivery, client eligibility determination and documentation, reporting systems, and achievement toward achieving contractual goals. Following the monitoring visit, a written report is provided delineating the results of the review and any findings of non- compliance and the required corrective action. Subrecipients normally have 30 days to provide the City with corrective actions taken to address any noted findings. Individualized technical assistance is provided, as noted above as soon as compliance concerns are identified.
For CDBG capital projects, monitoring also includes compliance with regulatory agreement requirements and may include annual monitoring to ensure renter occupied units’ household income, rent and utility allowance comply with applicable limits pursuant to the affordability covenant.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 114
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
The City of Victorville is undertaking several initiatives to address homelessness and housing instability. In December 2021, the City announced it was awarded a $28 million Homekey award from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the construction and operational suppo rt of its Wellness Center Campus. The campus is a critical component of the City’s strategy to reduce homelessness. Combining a low-barrier emergency shelter, recuperative care facility, medical clinic, interim housing, and wraparound support services. Con struction is expected to begin in 2022.
Discussion
The City of Victorville shares overall responsibility for meeting the priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan with many other organizations. The City is responsible for using CPD entitlement funds to address the needs of low- and moderate-income residents. Other City departments and organizations provide services to low - and moderate-income residents by utilizing funding from federal, state, local and private resources.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 118
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non-administrative CDBG investments for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people throughout the City. The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate-income people include lack of funding from federal, state, and other local sources.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 128
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 130
AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS
Introduction
The City’s planned investment of CDBG, funds through the 2022-2023 Action Plan will address obstacles to fostering development of and maintaining existing affordable housing; evaluating and reducing lead-based paint hazards; reducing the number of families living in at or below the poverty line; developing institutional structure; and enhanced coordination among collaborative agencies and organizations.
Additionally, this section will identify obstacles to meeting underserved populations needs and propose action to overcome those obstacles.
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low - and moderate - income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, and the high cost of housing that is not affordable to low -income people. To address this obstacle, at least in part, the City is investing CDBG funds in local nonprofit organizations to address the public service needs of those who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or have incomes that are extremely low-, low-, or moderate.
The City will continue offering low -interest loans or emergency grants to low - and moderate-income Victorville homeowners using CDBG funds. The Residential Rehabilitation Program provides financing for home improvements necessary to ensure that residents can continue to live in quality housing that is already affordable to the occupants.
To address underserved needs, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non - administrative CDBG funds in Program Year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people or people presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate-income.
The City will invest over $200,000 in Program Year 2022-2023 in support of ten unique local nonprofit organizations providing services to low - and mode rate-income households.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing During the 202 2-2023 Program Year, the City will use CDBG funds to continue preserving and maintaining existing affordable housing through the Residential Rehabilitation and the Senior and Disabled Adult Home Repairs Programs . The City will continue to participate in the Apple Valley -Victorville HOM E Consortium, an effective way of providing more housing resources to residents. Specifically, the Consortium will support the City’s Senior Housing Repair Program with HOME funds in FY 2022-2023.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 131
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. To reduce lead -based paint hazards, the City of Victorville Residential Rehabilitation Program will conduct lead-based paint testing and risk assessments for each property assisted that was built prior to January 1, 1978, and will incorporate safe work practices or abatement into the scope of work as required to reduce lead -based paint hazards in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35.
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in the Consolidated Plan-Strategic Plan and this Action Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty-level families by:
• Supporting activities that increase the supply of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate-income households;
• Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness;
• Supporting housing prese rvation programs that ensure low -income households have a safe, decent and appropriate place to live; and • Supporting public services through various nonprofits funded by CDBG that serve the community’s youth, seniors, families, veterans and residents with special needs.
The City will invest CDBG and HOME funds during the 2022 -2023 Program Year to address high priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan including supportive services of the homeless and those at risk of homelessness, human services, and housing programs. The City will also invest CDBG funds to address individuals and families with special needs.
To address incidences of homelessness City will use CDBG to finance life and safety upgrades and shelter operations for High Desert Homeless Services , additionally Consortium HOME funds will finance the development of additional transitional housing beds through Hughes Training and Development . To address the needs of those with special needs the City will direct CDBG funds to Rockn’ Our Disabilities nutritional support and arts and wellness programming targeted toward those with disabilities. To address the housing needs of the elderly and those with disabilities the City and the HOME Consortium will fund housing rehab pro gram targeted to these populations.
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 132
The institutional delivery system in Victorville is best represented through the collaboration between local government and an outstanding set of nonprofit organizations that carry out a diverse array of human service programs to enrich the lives of residents. These relationships are collaborative—each organization partnering with the next to ensure that all Victorville residents have the support necessary to lead fulfilling lives. Affordable housing development and preservation activities will be carried out by the City in partnership with housing developers and contractors.
Guided by the Strategic Plan, public service activities will be carried out by nonprofit organizations and City d epartments to serve low - and moderate-income residents.
The City will collaborate across departments on city -owned public facilities improvements and will partner closely with nonprofit organizations receiving capital improvement funds to ensure their projects are delivered on time, within budget, and in compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations.
Through technical assistance and the annual Notice of Funding Availability process commencing each November, the City continues to develop and expand local institutional structure by strengthening existing partnerships and leveraging the experience of organizations that previously have not participated in locally administered federal programs to expand the number of program offerings available to residents. The City consistently funds a variety of high-quality services that address underserved needs in Victorville.
Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies
To enhance coordina tion between public and private housing and social service agencies, the City will welcome and encourage the participation of a wide variety of agencies and organizations that deliver housing and supportive services that add value to the lives of low- and moderate-income residents in Victorville.
Discussion
In the implementation of the 20 22-2023 Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG and HOME resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead-based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty-level families, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 133
AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
In the implementation of programs and activities under the 202 2-2023 Action Plan, the City of Victorville will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment, overall low- and moderate-income benefit for the CDBG program
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0
2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0
3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0
5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities 0
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00%
Discussion
In the implementation of programs and activities under the 20 22-2023 Action Plan, the City of Victorville will monitor all subrecipients for compliance with HUD regulations and provide technical assistance as nec essary to ensure successful implementation. During FY 2021-2022 eight activities did not spend their entire allocation making about $272,115 available to reallocate to eligible projects during FY 2022-2023.
Draft 2022 Analysis of
Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice
This page is intentionally left blank.
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Debra Jones
Mayor
Leslie Irving
Mayor Pro Tem
Elizabeth Becerra
Council Member
Blanca Gomez
Council Member
This page is intentionally left blank.
i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Fair Housing Issues ......................................................................................................................... 2 Apple Valley ............................................................................................................................... 2 Victorville ................................................................................................................................... 5 Demographic Summary .................................................................................................................. 8 Segregation/Integration ................................................................................................................. 16 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 16 Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty ............................................................... 26 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 26 Disparities in Access to Opportunity ............................................................................................ 28 Educational Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 28 Employment Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 32 Transportation Opportunities .................................................................................................... 42 Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities ....................................................................................... 49 Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities ........................................................... 53 Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity ...................................................................... 57 Disproportionate Housing Needs .................................................................................................. 58 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 58
1 Executive Summary
The Town of Apple Valley was incorporated in 1988 and consists of 78 square miles. According to the 2020 Census, the population of the Town is approximately 76,000 people. The City of Victorville was incorporated in 1962 and encompasses 74 square miles. According to the 2020 Census, approximately 135,000 people live in the City. Since 1997, both cities have received an annual allocations of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
In 2003, the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville formed the HOME Investment Partnership Program Consortium (the “HOME Consortium”) in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME entitlement status with HUD. Both the City and the Town receive CDBG and HOME funding annually. For the purpose of this Assessment to Fair Housing (AFH), the Town of Apple Valley and the City of Victorville may be collectively referenced as “Communities” and “Jurisdictions”.
As Entitlement Jurisdictions, both the City and Town are required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) to assist the Communities in identifying fair housing issues, contributing factors, and goals in order to affirmatively further fair housing. Below is a summary of the fair housing issues, significant contributing factors, and fair housing goals. Also included is an overview of the process and analysis used to identify the fair housing issues and to reach the goals.
To conduct the Analysis of Impediments for Apple Valley and Victorville, the Jurisdictions gathered and analyzed data for each jurisdiction and the region. The region is defined as the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area, which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County. The data utilized are from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS), HUD’s AFFH Data and Mapping Tool, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, and stakeholder surveys conducted as part of the Con Plan process. The data are generally from the most recent available years, with the exception of the ACS data, which are from the 2013-2017 estimates in order to align with the data utilized in the Con Plan.
Analyzed data topics include:
• Demographic
• Housing
• Segregation/ Integration
• Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty • Disparities in Access to Opportunity
4 Mexican origin compared to other National Origin groups, or families with children compared to other types of families, indicating that these groups have less access to neighborhoods with employment opportunities (see Map 8 and Map 9).
• Access to transportation:
o Native Americans living below the poverty line experience the least access to public transit and the highest transportation costs of any group (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
• Exposure to poverty:
o While all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods, the following groups are most likely to live in neighborhoods with relatively high exposure to poverty (this is related to the fact that these groups disproportionately reside in the R/ECAP area):
Hispanic and Black residents (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
Mexican-born residents and families with children (see Map 12).
Housing Issues
• According to Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, the majority of fair housing complaints received in the jurisdiction are related to residents with a disability seeking reasonable accommodations (see Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021).
• Over half of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of their income to pay for housing-related costs. The percentage of all renters who are cost burdened is decreasing, however the number of cost-burdened renters is increasing (see Table 4 – Housing Trends).
• Native American, Hispanic, and Black households are significantly less likely than White, Non-Hispanic or Asian/Pacific Islander households to own their own homes (see Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity).
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns:
• A small but increasing proportion of the population has limited English proficiency. The main language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” is Spanish (see Table 2 – Demographics, Table 3 – Demographic Trends, and Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home).
• The population is aging. The proportion of the population that is over age 65 is increasing (see Table 3 – Demographic Trends).
• According to the Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index, while racial/ethnic segregation in Apple Valley remains low, it has been increasing since 1990, especially between White and Black residents (see Table 5 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends).
5 Victorville
Overview
According to the data analysis, all Victorville residents, regardless of protected class status, have relatively low access to high-performing schools, relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, there is evidence that different protected class groups face specific challenges regarding access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors. For example:
• Native Americans, particularly those living below the poverty line, appear to be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville. According to ACS data, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate and the highest unemployment rate of any group.
• Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs, which may be related to the fact that more residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas. • Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), which HUD defines as Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria:
a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
Segregation
• Mexican-born residents appear to be the predominant foreign-born group in the city’s central neighborhoods, while there appear to be higher concentrations of Asian-born residents in the southeastern Census tracts.
Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse Community Factors • R/ECAPs:
o Census tracts 0098 and 0099.05, along the eastern edge of the jurisdiction, are classified as R/ECAPs, as are Census tracts 0091.17 and 0091.16, which are partially within northern Victorville (see Map 1). Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs (see Table 2 - Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics). • Employment opportunities:
o Native Americans, and particularly those living below the poverty line, may be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville: Native Americans have the lowest Labor Market Index value of any group, and Native Americans below
6 the poverty line have the lowest Jobs Proximity Index value of any group (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
• Access to transportation:
o Asian and Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs than other groups (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity). This disparity may be related to the fact that, as shown on Map 10 and Map 11, a larger number of residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas (see Map 10 and Map 11).
• Exposure to poverty:
o While all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods, Asian and Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the highest exposure to poverty (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
Housing Issues
• According to Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, the majority of fair housing complaints received in the jurisdiction are related to residents with a disability seeking reasonable accommodations (see Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021).
• Over half of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of their income to pay for housing-related costs. The percentage of all renters who are cost burdened is decreasing, however the number of cost-burdened renters is increasing (see Table 4 – Housing Trends).
• Black households are significantly less likely than other households to own their own homes. Hispanic and Native American households are also less likely than White, Non- Hispanic or Asian/Pacific Islander households to be homeowners (see Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity).
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns:
• An increasing proportion of the population has limited English proficiency. The main language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” is Spanish (see Table 2 – Demographic, Table 3 – Demographic Trends, and Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home).
Fair Housing Goals
Many of the fair housing issues summarized above are largely driven by private market forces over which the Community Development programs have limited control. However, both Apple
7 Valley and Victorville are firmly committed to promoting access to fair housing and affirmatively furthering fair housing through all of their programs and activities.
To promote fair housing, the following goals have been established for Apple Valley and Victorville.
Goal Program Marketing
Description Both jurisdictions shall ensure that all HUD-funded programs are marketed in high poverty areas within their jurisdiction in manners that will be accessible to residents to ensure that low-income residents and high poverty neighborhoods have best access to all program activities.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall maintain documentation showing that it marketed programs in areas of high poverty and conducted such marketing in a way that clearly communicated the program to the residents in those areas.
Goal Target Non-Housing Activities in Areas of High Poverty Description Both jurisdictions shall use CDBG funds to carry out non-housing activities (such as public works, public services, and economic development) in areas of high poverty. This may include carrying out activities citywide, but promoting services in those areas or electing to target activities in these areas.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall report in the CAPER how its activities promoted anti-poverty goals and objectives.
Goal Monitor and Apply for Federal and State Funding to Increase Community Development and Housing Activities
Description Both jurisdictions shall actively monitor new funding opportunities for additional community development and affordable housing activities. Unless there is specific justification not to apply, the jurisdictions shall apply for these funding streams.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall maintain a log of new Federal and State funding streams that are available to promote affordable housing and community development.
Goal Promote Fair Housing Education for Tenants and Homebuyers Description Both jurisdictions shall fund and promote fair housing training for tenants, homebuyers and potential homebuyers to ensure that residents are fully informed of their rights as it relates to housing.
Evaluation Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Goal Promote Fair Housing Education for Landlords and Realtors
8 Description Both jurisdictions shall fund and promote fair housing training for landlords and realtors to ensure that they understand the fair housing requirements and rights of tenants and homebuyers. .
Evaluation Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Goal Maintain Fair Housing Resources on Website
Description In collaboration with the fair housing provider for the jurisdiction, maintain a page on the jurisdiction website that provides access to fair housing resources and documents. Further, collaborate with the fair housing provider to promote trainings and other fair housing related events.
Evaluation Review and update webpage resources annually with support from fair housing provider and maintain documentation of promoting all trainings and events carried out by the fair housing provider in the jurisdiction.
Goal Maintain Housing and Community Development Resources List
Description Establish and maintain a list of all housing and community development resources that is updated annually. This list may include services such as grant or loan programs for reasonable modifications and access to programs such as Meals on Wheels.
Evaluation Review and update list on an annual basis.
Demographic Summary
Describe demographic patterns in the jurisdiction and region and describe trends over time (since 1990).
Table 2 – Demographics, shows demographic information for the populations of Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. The region is defined as the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area, which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County.
Table 3 – Demographic Trends, shows similar data over time, going back to 1990.
Race/Ethnicity:
Apple Valley: As shown in Table 2, Apple Valley is a majority White, non-Hispanic jurisdiction. Just over half of Apple Valley’s population is White, non-Hispanic, approximately 35% are Hispanic, 7.7% are Black, and 3% are Asian or Pacific Islander. Over the past 30 years, Apple Valley has become less White. This trend has been driven by the growth of the Hispanic population, shown in Table 3.
9 Victorville: Victorville is a majority-minority city. Fifty-five percent of the population is Hispanic, 15% is Black, almost 4% is Asian or Pacific Islander, and 22% is White, Non- Hispanic. Over the past 30 years, Victorville’s population has increased due primarily to the growth of the Hispanic and Black populations. In 1990, the city was two-thirds White, Non- Hispanic. Since then, the White population has declined while the Black population more than quadrupled and the Hispanic population grew six-fold.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region: Apple Valley is a majority White, Non- Hispanic jurisdiction in a majority-minority region. Apple Valley has a much smaller percentage of Hispanic residents than either Victorville or the region. Victorville’s population, which is 55% Hispanic, looks more like the region, however, Victorville has a higher percentage of Black residents than either the region or Apple Valley. Both Apple Valley and Victorville have a smaller proportion of Asian or Pacific Islander residents than the region. Over the past 30 years, all three geographies have experienced population growth driven in part by increasing numbers of Hispanic residents. In Victorville and the region, the White, Non-Hispanic population also declined over this period, while in Apple Valley, the number of White, Non-Hispanic residents increased. As a result of these trends, Victorville and the region became majority Hispanic.
Apple Valley, in comparison, continues to be majority White, Non-Hispanic.
National Origin
Apple Valley: As shown in Table 2, the main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Apple Valley is Mexico. Residents born in Mexico comprise 3.34% of the population.
Residents from El Salvador and the Philippines each represent approximately 0.87% of the population of Apple Valley. Over the past 30 years, the foreign-born population in Apple Valley has grown from 5.55% of the population to over 9%.
Victorville: As shown in Table 2, the main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Victorville is Mexico, followed by El Salvador and the Philippines. Just over 10% of the population was born in Mexico. Over the past 30 years, the foreign-born population in Victorville has grown from about 10% of the population to nearly 18%.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region: The main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region is Mexico. El Salvador and the Philippines are the second and third most common nations of origin for the foreign-born population in all three areas. In all three geographies, the proportion of the population that is foreign-born has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3. Table 2 and Table 3 also show that Apple Valley has had, and continues to have, a relatively small proportion of foreign-born residents when compared to both Victorville and the region. In the most current year shown in Table 3 (2017), 9.29% of Apple Valley residents were born outside the U.S., compared to 17.74% of Victorville residents and 21.37% of the regional population.
Limited English Proficiency
Apple Valley:
10 As shown in Table 2, the most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Apple Valley is Spanish.1 Over 3% of Apple Valley’s population has limited English proficiency (LEP) and uses Spanish as their primary language at home. The proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3.
Victorville:
The most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Victorville is Spanish. Over 10% of Victorville’s population has limited English proficiency (LEP) and uses Spanish as their primary language at home. The proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table
3. Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
As shown in Table 2, the most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Apple Valley, Victorville. and the region is Spanish. Apple Valley has a smaller proportion of residents that have limited English proficiency (LEP) and use Spanish as their primary language at home, compared to Victorville and the region. In all three geographies, the proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 also shows that Apple Valley has a smaller proportion of LEP residents than either Victorville or the region, and Victorville has a slightly smaller proportion of LEP residents than the region. For the most current year shown in Table 3 (2017), 4.91% of Apple Valley residents, 12.22% of Victorville residents, and 15% of the region’s residents had limited English proficiency.
Disability
Apple Valley:
As shown in Table 2, the most common types of disabilities in Apple Valley are ambulatory difficulties (8.72% of the population has an ambulatory difficulty), followed by independent living difficulties (6.17% of the population) and cognitive difficulties (5.34% of the population).
Victorville:
The most common types of disabilities in Victorville are ambulatory difficulties (5.56% of the population has an ambulatory difficulty), followed by independent living difficulties (4.37% of the population) and cognitive difficulties (4.36% of the population).
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
The most significant disability types in all three geographies are the same: ambulatory, independent living, and cognitive difficulties. However, Apple Valley has higher rates of individuals living with disabilities than either Victorville or the region. Table 1 – Housing
1 The ACS does not provide 5-year estimates for all languages spoken by the population that speaks English “less than very well” after the 2011-2015 dataset. Instead, for later years, data is provided for those who speak Spanish, Other Indo-European languages, Asian and Pacific Islander languages, and Other languages. There are 1-year estimates through 2019 that provide more specificity regarding languages spoken, but these estimates are not available for Apple Valley. For this reason, Table 2 uses the AFFH data provided by HUD, which is from the 2011- 2015 ACS, with the exception of data for Spanish speakers, which is taken from the 2013-2017 ACS table S1601.
12 declining in Apple Valley and the region, and increasing in Victorville, while the opposite is true for the population aged 65 years and older in all three places.
Family Type
Apple Valley:
As shown in Table 2, in Apple Valley, the percentage of all family households that have children under the age of 18 living with them is 41.07%.
Victorville:
As shown in Table 2, in Victorville, the percentage of all family households that have children under the age of 18 living with them is 52.05%.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
As shown in Table 2, Victorville has a higher proportion of families with children than the region, and the region has a higher proportion of families with children than Apple Valley. In all three geographies, the proportion of families that have children is lower than it was in 1990, as shown in Table 3.
13 Describe housing patterns in the jurisdiction and region, including tenure, cost burden, and the location of renters and owners.
Tenure
Table 4 – Housing Trends, below, shows data on housing tenure and cost burden for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. These data are from the 2008-2012 and 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, the number of housing units increased by about 1,000 units, from 22,975 to 23,911, due entirely to an increase in rental housing units. The number and share of owner- occupied housing units declined over this period, however, the majority of housing remains owner-occupied (64.81% of units were owner-occupied in 2017).
Victorville:
In Victorville, the number of housing units increased by about 1,500 units, from 31,186 to 32,629, due entirely to an increase in rental housing units. The number and share of owner- occupied housing units declined over this period. While the majority of housing remains owner- occupied (53.54% of units were owner-occupied in 2017), if these trends continue, rental housing will soon comprise the majority of housing in the city.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In all three geographies, the total number of housing units is increasing, and most of the housing remains owner-occupied. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, however, the number and share of owner-occupied housing decreased in all three places. Victorville has a higher share of rental housing units compared to Apple Valley and the region. Of all three places, Apple Valley has the highest homeownership rate.
Cost Burden
Apple Valley:
As of 2017, over half of renters (53.03%) in Apple Valley were cost-burdened, meaning they used more than 30% of their monthly income to pay for housing-related costs. Among
14 homeowners, slightly less than 1/3 were cost-burdened. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, the number and percentage of homeowners who were cost-burdened declined. Over the same period, the number of cost-burdened renters increased slightly, however the percentage of all renters who are cost-burdened declined, due to the larger increase in the total number of renters.
Victorville:
As of 2017, over half of renters (57.16%) in Victorville were cost-burdened. Among homeowners, about 1/3 were cost-burdened. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, the number and percentage of homeowners who were cost-burdened declined. Over the same period, the number of cost-burdened renters increased, however the percentage of all renters who are cost-burdened declined, due to the larger increase in the total number of renters.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In all three geographies, over half of all renters in were cost-burdened in 2017. Victorville had the highest rate of cost-burden among renters, followed by the region. Apple Valley renters were the least likely to be cost-burdened. In all three geographies, about 1/3 of homeowners were cost- burdened in 2017. Over the five-year period between 2012-2017, trends were similar across all three geographies: the number and percentage of cost-burdened homeowners decreased, perhaps reflecting the recovery from the Great Recession; and the percentage of renters who were cost- burdened decreased, however, the number of cost-burdened renter households increased.
Map 16 – Housing Tenure includes two maps showing the distribution of renter households in Apple Valley/Victorville and the region. The darker shaded areas have a higher proportion of renter households. The map of Apple Valley/Victorville shows a high concentration of renter households in two Census tracts in Apple Valley: 0097.16 in the center of the jurisdiction and 0097.10 in the southeast part of the jurisdiction. In Victorville, the Census tracts in the southeast part of the city have high concentrations of renters, as does the portion of Census tract 0091.16 that is inside Victorville’s northwest boundary. In the region, there are concentrations of renters in the southwest, as well as in Census tracts in the central and northern part of the region.
15 16
Segregation/Integration
Analysis
Describe and compare segregation levels in the jurisdiction and region.
Identify the racial/ethnic groups that experience the highest levels of segregation. Explain how these segregation levels have changed over time (since 1990).
Table 5 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends shows how segregated or integrated various racial/ethnic groups are in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region using a Dissimilarity Index, which is calculated using data from the 2010 Decennial Census. The Dissimilarity Index measures the degree to which two groups are evenly distributed across a geographic area and is commonly used for assessing residential segregation between two groups. Dissimilarity index values between 0 and 39 generally indicate high integration (low segregation), values between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation, and values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation.
Apple Valley:
As Table 5 shows, Apple Valley has relatively high levels of integration among White and Black, White and Hispanic, and White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents. Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents are the most integrated according to this metric, while Black and White residents are the least integrated. While integration is relatively high, over the past 30 years, Apple Valley has become more segregated, with segregation levels between Black and White residents increasing the most of any group.
Victorville:
Table 5 shows Victorville has relatively high levels of integration among the various race/ethnic groups. In Victorville, Hispanic and White residents are the most integrated and Black and White residents are the least integrated, according to this metric. Similar to Apple Valley, over the past 30 years, segregation levels have increased slightly overall. Segregation between Hispanic and White residents and between Asian or Pacific Islander and White residents increased, while segregation between Black and White residents decreased.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Apple Valley and Victorville, compared to the region, are more integrated than the surrounding jurisdictions and county. The Dissimilarity Index values show moderate levels of segregation between race/ethnic groups in the region, with Black and White residents experiencing the highest degree of segregation. Over the last few decades, as all three geographies have become less White and more Hispanic (as shown in Table 5), they have also become more segregated overall.
17 Identify areas with relatively high segregation and integration by race/ethnicity, national origin, or LEP group, and indicate the predominant groups living in each area. Discuss how patterns of segregation have changed over time (since 1990).
Map 1 – Race/Ethnicity shows the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region—each dot represents 75 people, and the various racial/ethnic groups are represented by different colored dots. Map 2 – Race/Ethnicity Trends shows the same distribution at three different points in the past: 1990, 2000, and 2010. In these maps there are no apparent concentrations or separation of colored dots within Apple Valley or Victorville, indicating that residents of different racial/ethnic groups within each jurisdiction experience high levels of residential integration and have for the past few decades. However, the maps do clearly show the higher numbers of Hispanic and Black residents (represented by blue and green dots, respectively) in Victorville compared to Apple Valley, as well as the increase in Hispanic residents in Victorville over the past 30 years.
In the region, by comparison, Map 1 shows some areas of racial/ethnic concentration that align with the dissimilarity indices showing higher levels of segregation in the region than in Apple Valley or Victorville. While the maps are somewhat hard to read at this scale, there are areas on Map 1 where orange dots (representing White, Non-Hispanic residents) are clustered with few people of other racial/ethnic groups present. Map 2 shows the changing demographics over time, with an increasing number of Hispanic residents, represented by blue dots on the map, concentrated in certain parts of the region.
18 19
20 21
Map 3 – National Origin shows the distribution of foreign-born residents in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. On the maps, each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored
22 dots represent different countries of birth, for the 5 most populous groups of foreign-born residents. In Apple Valley, Mexican-born residents are present throughout the jurisdiction, however, in the Census tracts in the center of the jurisdiction they are the only foreign-born population group present. In Victorville, Mexican-born residents and residents born in the various Asian countries listed on the map are present throughout the city. However, Mexican- born residents appear to be the predominant foreign-born group in the city’s central neighborhoods, while there appear to be higher concentrations of Asian-born residents in the southeastern Census tracts. In the region, there are concentrations of residents born in Mexico in certain areas, as indicated by the dense concentrations of orange dots.
23 According to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (ACS), shown in Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home, below, 19.4% of Apple Valley residents over the age of 5 speak a language other than English at home, including 5.9% that speak English less than “very well”. Of those who speak English less than “very well”, the largest group is of those that speak Spanish: 4.5% of Apple Valley’s population has limited English proficiency and speaks Spanish at home.
In Victorville, 38.4% of residents over the age of 5 speak a language other than English at home, including 13.9% that speak English less than “very well”. Of those who speak English less than “very well”, the largest group is of those that speak Spanish: 11.6% of Victorville’s population has limited English proficiency and speaks Spanish at home.
24 Map 4 - LEP shows the distribution of residents in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region with Limited English Proficiency. On the maps, each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored dots represent languages spoken by individuals who speak English “less than very well,” for the 5 most common languages spoken by residents with limited English proficiency (LEP). In Apple Valley and Victorville, Spanish speakers appear to be distributed throughout the jurisdictions, while Tagalog speakers appear to live in Census tracts on the western edge of each jurisdiction. In the region, Spanish speakers seem to be concentrated in certain areas as shown by the groupings of orange dots.
25 Consider and describe the location of owner and renter occupied housing in determining whether such housing is located in segregated or integrated areas.
The analysis above shows that Apple Valley and Victorville residents of various race/ethnicity, national origin, and LEP groups generally experience relatively high levels of residential integration across the jurisdiction. The only noticeable exception in Apple Valley is Census tract 0097.16, in the center of the jurisdiction, where the only foreign-born residents are those who were born in Mexico.
Discuss whether there are any demographic trends, policies, or practices that could lead to higher segregation in the jurisdiction in the future.
According to the above analysis, Apple Valley and Victorville have become more diverse over the past few decades and there is reason to believe this trend will continue. Over the same period, segregation in Apple Valley has increased and may continue to do so as the jurisdiction diversifies further. In Victorville, segregation between Hispanic and White, and between Asian or Pacific Islander and White residents, has also increased over this period. These trends may continue if the city’s demographics continue to change. Both Apple Valley and Victorville actively evaluate policies to limit policies that may directly or inadvertently result in segregation within the jurisdictions.
26 Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of
Poverty
Analysis
Identify any R/ECAPs or groupings of R/ECAP tracts within the jurisdiction.
HUD defines racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) as Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria:
• a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and
• a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
As shown in Map 1, below, in Apple Valley, Census tract 0097.16, in the center of the jurisdiction, is classified as a R/ECAP—this is shown by the pink outline. In Victorville, Census tracts 0098 and 0099.05, along the eastern edge of the jurisdiction, are classified as R/ECAPs.
Additionally, Census tracts 0091.17 and 0091.16, which are partially within northern Victorville, are also classified as R/ECAPs.
Which protected classes disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs compared to the jurisdiction and region?
27 Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics, includes details on the race/ethn icity, family type, and national origin of residents living in R/ECAPs in Apple Valley , Victorville, and the region.
By comparing the demographic data in Table 2 - Demographics (on page 12) to Table 7, below, we can identify which protected class groups disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs— generally speaking, if the percentage of a particular class living in R/ECAPs is higher than the percentage of the total population they represent, we can say they disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. For example, in Apple Valley, Black residents only make up 7.7% of the jurisdiction’s total population, yet 15.33% of the R/ECAP population is Black. This indicates that Black residents of Apple Valley disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. Additionally, in Apple Valley, families with children and residents born in Mexico also disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. In Victorville, Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. In the region, Black and H ispanic residents, Mexican -born residents, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs.
Describe how R/ECAPs have changed over time (since 1990).
According to Map 2 (on pages 19 -21), which shows demographics in Apple Valley , Victorville, and the region at three different points in time (1990, 2000, and 2010), there were no R/ECAPs in Apple Valley or Victorville in 1990, but in 2000, tract 0098 in Victorville was classified as a R/ECAP . According to Map 1 (on page 26) , in 2010, tract 0098 in
28 Victorville was still a R/ECAP and three more tracts in the city were classified as R/ECAPs.
In Apple Valley, Census tract 0097.16 was classified as a R/ECAP in 2010.2 Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Educational Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to proficient schools based on race/ethnicity, national origin, and family status.
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a School Proficiency Index, which measures the proximity various racial/ethnic groups have, based on where they live, to neighborhoods with high-performing schools. School proficiency is measured using school-level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams. The index is based on a range of 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better proximity to high-performing schools.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, there is some disparity in access to high-performing schools by race/ethnicity.
Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (with an index value of 43.44), followed by White residents (41.45), Native American residents (38.99), and Hispanic residents (37.35). Black residents are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools, with an index value of 36.35. In general, index values for all residents are relatively low, indicating access to high-performing schools is a problem for the entire jurisdiction. For the population living below the poverty line, access to high-performing schools is even more limited. Except for Native American residents living below the poverty line, who have the highest index value of any group, all other race/ethnic groups living below the poverty line have less access to high-performing schools. Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the least access, with index values of 29.28 and 29.56, respectively.
Victorville:
In Victorville, there are small disparities in access to high-performing schools by race/ethnicity.
White, Non-Hispanic residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (with an index value of 20.95), followed by Asian/Pacific Islander residents (20.07), Hispanic residents (19.4), Black residents (19.33), and Native American residents (16.47), who have the least access. The population below the poverty line has similar levels of access to high- performing schools, though Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the best access of any group (23.63).
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
2 The 2010 version of Map 2 does not show any R/ECAPs in Apple Valley. The discrepancy between R/ECAPs shown on Map 2 and Map 1 is due to the fact that HUD uses different sources of data for these maps. More information about the data used for these maps can be found online at https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/FHEO/documents/AFFH-T-Data-Documentation-AFFHT0006-July-2020.pdf
29 In the region, there are much wider disparities in the school proficiency index across racial/ethnic groups and for the population below the poverty line. Black and Hispanic residents below the poverty line have the lowest index values (25.68 and 26.74, respectively), meaning they are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools. White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents above the poverty line have the highest index values (46.63 and
51.51, respectively) meaning they are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools.
Compared to the region, Apple Valley’s White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly worse access to high-performing schools, while Apple Valley’s Black, Hispanic, and Native American residents have slightly better access. This also means that there is slightly less disparity in access based on race/ethnicity in Apple Valley, as compared to the region
In Victorville, in comparison both Apple Valley and the region, residents have less access to high-performing schools: However, in Victorville, there are fewer disparities by race/ethnicity as compared to the region and Apple Valley.
30 Describe the relationship between the residency patterns of racial/ethnic, national origin, and family status groups and their proximity to proficient schools.
Map 7 – Demographics and School Proficiency is a series of three maps showing the School Proficiency Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type.
The maps are shaded according to school proximity index values. The darker shaded areas are those with higher index values, indicating the presence of higher performing schools in those areas.
Apple Valley:
There are differences in school performance based on geography, with neighborhoods in the southwest of the jurisdiction having the highest performing schools, and the more central neighborhoods having the least access to high-performing schools.
The first map shows that residents of different racial/ethnic groups, represented by different colored dots, seem to be evenly distributed across Apple Valley, with no visible concentrations in areas with better or worse access to high-performing schools. The second map shows that the areas with least access to high-performing schools, which are in the center of the jurisdiction, are home to residents originally from Mexico. The other national origin groups reside in areas with better access to high-performing schools. This indicates that residents born in Mexico may have less access to high-performing schools than other groups.
The third map shows where families with children live in relation to areas with high-performing schools. The size of the circles on the map indicates the percentage of families in the area that have children living with them. The map shows that the areas with the least access to high- performing schools (in the R/ECAP in the center of the jurisdiction) also have the highest proportion of families with children (shown by the relatively large circles).
Victorville:
In Victorville, there are also differences in school performance based on geography. Census tracts in the southeast have darker shading than the rest of the city, indicating higher performing schools.
The first two maps show that residents of different racial/ethnic groups and different national origins, represented by different colored dots, do not seem to be concentrated in areas with better or worse access to high-performing schools. Similarly, the third map shows that larger circles, indicating higher proportions of families with children, do not seem to be clustered in areas with either higher or lower performing schools. All this indicates that Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities, national origins, and family types have similar levels of access to high- performing schools.
31 32
Describe how school-related policies, such as school enrollment policies, affect a student’s ability to attend a proficient school. Which protected class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools? Both Apple Valley and Victorville school districts strive to create and promote proficient schools across their districts. The school districts
From the above analysis, it appears that, in Apple Valley, Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line, as well as residents born in Mexico and families with children are more likely than other residents to live in areas with lower-performing schools, indicating that these protected class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools. In Victorville, compared to Apple Valley and the region, all residents, regardless of race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type, have relatively low access to high-performing schools.
Employment Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to jobs and labor markets by protected class groups.
Jobs Proximity
33 Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Jobs Proximity Index, which measures the physical distance between where Apple Valley and Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities live and the location of jobs. A higher index value indicates better access to employment opportunities.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, access to employment opportunities is relatively low for all groups, and those living below the poverty line have less access to employment centers. There is some disparity in access to employment centers by race/ethnicity, with Asian/Pacific most likely to live near employment centers (index value of 26.91) and Hispanic residents least likely to live near employment centers (index value of 19.57).
Victorville:
In Victorville, access to employment opportunities varies slightly by race/ethnicity. Native American residents have the best access to employment centers (with an index value of 50.68) and Asian/Pacific Islanders have the least access (index value of 34.16). For all race/ethnic groups except Native Americans, populations living below the poverty line has better access to employment centers.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In both Victorville and the region, residents of all races/ethnicities, including those living below the poverty line (except for Native Americans living below the poverty line in Victorville), have better access to employment centers than residents of Apple Valley. In the region, there are also disparities in access to employment centers based on race/ethnicity. Black residents living below the poverty line have the least access to employment centers (with an index value of 41.83) and Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the greatest access (with an index value of 57.38).
Labor Market
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Labor Market Index, which measures the unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor’s degree, by neighborhood. A higher index value indicates that residents live in a neighborhood with higher labor force participation and human capital.
Apple Valley:
Table 8 shows that Apple Valley residents generally live in neighborhoods with low labor force participation and human capital, as indicated by the relatively low index values for all race/ethnic groups. Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital: they have index values of just 8.26 and 8.66, respectively. Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital: they have an index value of 19.83, which is still relatively low.
Victorville:
34 Table 8 shows that Victorville residents generally live in neighborhoods with low labor force participation and human capital, as indicated by the relatively low index values for all race/ethnic groups. Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital (with an index value of 14.63) and Native American residents are least likely to (index value of 8.94). Except for Native Americans, populations living below the poverty line are even less likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
The population of Victorville, in comparison to Apple Valley and the region, has relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital. Apple Valley residents lag the region’s residents on this index: overall the region’s residents have better access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital than both Victorville and Apple Valley. In the region, there are significant disparities in access based on race/ethnicity.
Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the least access of any group to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital (with index values of
16.85) and Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the most access (with an index value of 57.38).
How does a person’s place of residence affect their ability to obtain a job?
Map 8 – Demographics and Job Proximity is a series of three maps showing the Jobs Proximity Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are closer to areas of employment.
Apple Valley:
The maps show the northern part of Apple Valley has better proximity to jobs centers, meaning residents that live in those areas are closer to employment opportunities. Because Apple Valley is well integrated by race/ethnicity, there does not appear to be any major difference in proximity to job opportunities by race/ethnicity on the first map. However, on the second and third maps show, in the areas with the best access to employment centers there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin and families with children.
Victorville:
The maps show Census tracts in the southeast and northwest of Victorville have some of the highest jobs proximity index values, meaning residents that live in those areas are closer to employment opportunities. Because Victorville is relatively well integrated by race/ethnicity, there does not appear to be any major difference in proximity to job opportunities by race/ethnicity on the first map. Similarly, the second and third maps show that residents of different national origins and families with children are also fairly well distributed across the areas with better access to jobs.
35 36
Map 9 – Demographics and Labor Market is a series of three maps showing the Labor Market Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they have higher labor force participation and human capital.
Apple Valley:
The maps show that the northern part of Apple Valley and a Census tract on the western edge have the highest levels of labor force participation and human capital, relative to other parts of the jurisdiction. Similar to Map 8, there does not appear to be any concentration of specific race/ethnic groups in areas with higher or lower index values, however there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin and families with children in the areas with the highest levels of labor force participation and human capital.
Victorville:
The maps show that all parts of Victorville have relatively low labor market index values—there is no dark shading on the map. Certain areas of the city do have slightly higher index values, including the sparsely populated northernmost Census tract, and two Census tracts in the southwest. Similar to Map 8, there do not appear to be any concentrations of protected class groups in specific areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation and human capital.
37 38
Which racial/ethnic, national origin, or family status groups are least successful in accessing employment?
Table 9 – Labor Force Participation and Unemployment, below, shows 2013-2017 American Community Survey data on labor force participation rates and unemployment rates for the overall population and by race/ethnicity, disability status, and sex, in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. The graph below, titled COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Unemployment Rate, shows the monthly unemployment rate for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region in 2020 and 2021, demonstrating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on employment.
Apple Valley:
According to Table 9, in Apple Valley, Hispanic residents have the highest labor force participation rate (60.8%) and Black residents have the lowest (39.3%). There are also wide disparities in the unemployment rate. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest unemployment rate (8.17%), while Hispanic and Native American residents have significantly higher unemployment rates (15.2% and 19.9%, respectively). Persons living with a disability are less likely to participate in the labor force and are more likely to be unemployed than the population as a whole. Finally, women in Apple Valley are more likely to be unemployed than men.
According to Table 8, Black and Hispanic residents in Apple Valley who are living below the poverty line are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and
39 human capital. Additionally, Map 8 and Map 9 show that Apple Valley residents born in Mexico and families with children are less likely to live in areas with good access to job centers, high labor force participation, and high levels of human capital.
Victorville:
According to Table 9, in Victorville, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate (31.7%) and the highest unemployment rate of any group (25.8%). Among other race/ethnic groups, labor force participation is nearly the same, however there are large disparities in the unemployment rates. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest unemployment rate (7.41%), followed by White residents (11.4%), Hispanic residents (15.3%), and Black residents (15.9%). Persons living with a disability are less likely to participate in the labor force and are more likely to be unemployed than the population as a whole.
According to Table 8, Native Americans have the lowest Labor Market Index value of any group, and Native Americans below the poverty line have the lowest Jobs Proximity Index value of any group. This indicates that Native Americans, and particularly those living below the poverty line, may be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville.
As shown in the graph below, during the economic shutdown initiated in response to COVID-19, unemployment in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region increased dramatically. Victorville, in comparison to Apple Valley and the region, started off with a higher unemployment rate, reached a higher peak level of unemployment (17% in April 2020), and has maintained a higher unemployment level since then. While the unemployment rate in the region reached a higher level in April 2020 than the unemployment rate in Apple Valley (peaking at 15.2% in the region compared to 13.4% in Apple Valley), employment in the region has recovered at a faster rate than in Apple Valley. Since October 2020 the region has maintained a lower unemployment rate than Apple Valley.
40 It is very likely the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated racial/ethnic and gender-based unemployment disparities in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. While data at a local level is not yet available, national trends show wide disparities in job losses by race/ethnicity and sex.
According to the Congressional Research Service,3 across the U.S., women at every age group experienced higher increases in unemployment during the pandemic than men. The same was true for Black and Hispanic workers in comparison to White and Asian workers. The charts below show the disparities in peak unemployment rates during the pandemic by age/sex, race, and ethnicity.
3 Falk, G., Romero, P., Nicchitta, I., & Nyhof, E. (2021, August 20). Unemployment Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved December 4, 2021 , from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R46554
41 42
Transportation Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to transportation based on place of residence, cost, or other transportation related factors.
Access to Public Transit
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Transit Index, which measures the likelihood that residents utilize public transportation. Higher index values indicate better access to public transit in a neighborhood. Map 10 – Demographics and Transit Trips is a series of three maps showing the Transit Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with better access to public transit.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, Apple Valley residents of different races/ethnicities have comparable access to public transit. Index values range from a low of 30.24 for Asian/Pacific Islanders to a high of
36.48 for Black residents. For the population below the poverty line, access to public transit is generally better, with higher index values for all groups except for Native Americans living below the poverty line, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 18.01.
As Map 10 shows, residents in the R/ECAP Census tract in the center of the jurisdiction have the best access to public transit in Apple Valley. As described previously, Apple Valley residents experience a relatively high level of residential integration across races/ethnicities, therefore Map 10 shows that there is no significant concentration of specific racial/ethnic groups in neighborhoods with greater or lesser access to public transit. However, of all national origin groups, only residents of Mexican origin live in the R/ECAP area, indicating they have better access to public transit than other national origin groups. Similarly, the R/ECAP area has a high concentration of families with children (shown by the relatively large dots on the third map), indicating those families with children have relatively good access to transit.
43 Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities have comparable access to public transit. Index values range from a low of 27.12 for Asian/Pacific Islanders to a high of
29.92 for Black residents. For the population below the poverty line, access to public transit is generally better, with higher index values for all groups except for Black residents living below the poverty line.
As Map 10 shows, Census tracts in the center of the city and in the north have the best access to public transit in Victorville (shown by the darker shading). As the first map shows, residents of different races/ethnicities are evenly distributed across the city, therefore there are no visible disparities in access to public transit by race/ethnicity. On the second map, however, which shows the distribution of residents of various national origins, there appear to be relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, or Korean origin, compared to those of Mexican origin, in the Census tracts with the most access to public transit. This indicates that Victorville residents born in these Asian countries may be less able to access public transit than other groups. Finally, the third map, which shows the distribution of families with children, does not appear to show any concentration of families with children in areas with high or low access to public transit.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents in Apple Valley generally have better access to public transit compared to their counterparts in Victorville. In the region, all racial/ethnic groups have better access to public transit compared to both Apple Valley and Victorville. In the region, Native Americans have the least access, with an index value of 47.70, and Asian/Pacific Islanders have the greatest access, with in index value of 55.92. Access to public transit is generally even higher for the population living below the poverty line, with Asian/Pacific Islanders living below the poverty having the highest index value (58.72).
44 45
Transportation Costs
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Low Transportation Cost Index, which measures the cost of transportation in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate lower transportation costs. Transportation costs may be low in a neighborhood due to better access to public transportation, or to the density of housing, services, and employment, or to other reasons. Map 11 – Demographics and Low Transportation Cost is a series of three maps showing the Low Transportation Cost Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with lower transportation costs.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, transportation costs are comparable for all racial/ethnic groups in Apple Valley. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the highest costs, with an index value of 38, and Black residents have the lowest costs, with an index value of 40. For residents living below the poverty line, transportation costs are generally lower, with higher index values for all groups except Native Americans, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 34.19.
Map 11 shows that residents in the R/ECAP Census tract in the center of the jurisdiction have lower transportation costs than residents in other areas. The even distribution of colored dots on the first map indicates that there is no concentration of specific racial/ethnic groups in neighborhoods with higher or lower transportation costs. The second map shows that, of the various national origin groups in Apple Valley, only residents born in Mexico live in the
46 R/ECAP area. The third map shows that there is a high concentration of families with children in the R/ECAP (shown by the relatively large dot sizes in that area). These maps indicate that residents born in Mexico and families with children benefit from living in an area with lower transportation costs.
Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, transportation costs are comparable for all racial/ethnic groups in Victorville.
Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the highest costs, with an index value of 35.92, and Native American residents have the lowest costs, with an index value of 39.06. For residents living below the poverty line, transportation costs are generally lower, with higher index values for all groups except Native Americans, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 29.21.
Map 11 shows that residents living in the Census tracts in the center of the city—the area with the darkest shading—have the lowest transportation costs. Similar to Map 10, there does not appear to be a concentration of particular race/ethnic groups, or families with children, in areas with higher or lower transportation costs. However, the Census tracts shaded the darkest do appear to be areas with relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin, indicating those groups may face higher transportation costs relative to others.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents in Apple Valley and Victorville have very similar levels of access to neighborhoods with low transportation costs. In the region, index values are slightly higher for all groups compared to Apple Valley and Victorville, indicating lower transportation costs overall for residents in the region. There are no large disparities by race/ethnicity. The lowest index value is
42.13 (for White, Non-Hispanic residents) and the highest index value is 46.31 (for Hispanic residents). For the population below the poverty line, index values are higher for all racial/ethnic groups. Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the highest index value (49.70) and White, Non-Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the lowest index value (45.70).
47 48
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by the lack of a reliable, affordable transportation connection between their place of residence and opportunities?
In general, different race/ethnic groups in Apple Valley have similar levels of access to public transportation and experience similar transportation costs. The exception is Native Americans living below the poverty line, who experience the least access to public transit and the highest transportation costs of any group. Residents of Mexican origin and families with children who live in the R/ECAP area in the center of the jurisdiction appear to have relatively good access to public transit and relatively low transportation costs.
Similarly, in Victorville, different race/ethnic groups have broadly similar levels of access to public transportation and experience similar transportation costs. However, Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs. This disparity may be related to the fact that, as shown on Map 10 and Map 11, a larger number of residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas.
Describe how the jurisdictions’ and region’s policies, such as public transportation routes or transportation systems designed for use personal vehicles, affect the ability of protected class groups to access transportation.
49 The Victor Valley Transit Authority (VVTA) establishes and maintains bus routes throughout the high desert communities. VVTA maintains routes that serve all communities within the region and evaluates its routes to ensure they are the most effective routes to serve the high desert communities. VVTA complements its regular bus route with programs such as its van pool program to offer subsidies to van pools for commuters traveling together.
Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities
Describe any disparities in exposure to poverty by protected class groups.
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Low Poverty Index, which measures the level of poverty in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty (with an index value of 42.92), followed by White residents (39.3). Hispanic and Black residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with index values of 31.95 and 32.29, respectively. Residents living below the poverty line generally have higher exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. The exception is Native American residents living below the poverty line, who are slightly less likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than the overall Native American population in Apple Valley.
Victorville:
In Victorville, all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty (with an index value of 24.31), followed by White residents (23.43). Hispanic, Black, and Native American residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with index values of 21.57, 21.16, and 20.78, respectively. Residents living below the poverty line generally have higher exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. In fact, Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the highest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 15.92. The exception is Native American residents living below the poverty line, who are the least likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods of any group.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Victorville residents are more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than Apple Valley residents. Disparities in which race/ethnic groups are more likely to be exposed to poverty are similar in both places. Regionwide, residents are generally less likely to live in neighborhoods where they are exposed to poverty than either Apple Valley or Victorville, however the disparities in index values by race/ethnicity are larger. In the region, Hispanic residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 36.39. Asia/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 58.83. The population living below the poverty line in the region is even more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods, with index values significantly lower than the overall population.
50 Index values for the population below the poverty line range from 24.29 for Hispanic residents to
41.94 for Asian/Pacific Islander residents.
What role does a person’s place of residence play in their exposure to poverty?
Map 12 – Demographics and Poverty is a series of three maps showing the Low Poverty Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to poverty.
Apple Valley:
Map 12 shows that residents in neighborhoods in the northern and southeastern parts of Apple Valley have less exposure to poverty, and residents in the R/ECAP area in the center of the jurisdiction have the highest exposure to poverty. While racial/ethnic groups seem to be relatively evenly distributed across areas with both higher and lower exposure to poverty, the second and third maps show that there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin or families with children in the darkest shaded areas in the north compared to the R/ECAP area. This indicates that Mexican-born residents and families with children are more likely than other groups to be exposed to poverty in the neighborhoods where they live.
Victorville:
In Victorville, Map 12 shows that residents in the Census tracts in the central and eastern part of the city (including the two R/ECAPs) and in the R/ECAP in the northwest, are the most likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods. Given the even distribution of race/ethnic groups and families with children across the jurisdiction, there is no apparent concentration of specific race/ethnic groups or of families with children in those areas with more or less exposure to poverty. The second map in the series, which shows where residents of different national origins live, does show that there are relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, or Korean origin in those Census tracts with the highest exposure to poverty, compared to other parts of the city. This indicates that those populations are less likely to be exposed to poverty than other national origin groups.
51 52
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by these poverty indicators?
Table 10 – Poverty by Race/Ethnicity and National Origin, below, shows data from the 2013- 2017 American Community Survey on poverty rates by race/ethnicity and national origin.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, according to the above analysis, Black and Hispanic residents are more likely to live in neighborhoods with relatively high exposure to poverty, as are residents of Mexican origin and families with children. According to Table 10, Native American residents have the highest poverty rate (31.49%), followed by Hispanic residents (24.2%), Black residents (24.07%), White residents (13.86%), and Asian/Pacific Islander residents, who have the lowest poverty rate (6.31%). Foreign-born residents of Apple Valley are less likely than native-born resident to live below the poverty line, with a poverty rate of 14.53% compared to 18.49% for native-born residents.
Victorville:
In Victorville, the above analysis indicates that all residents have a relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, the analysis also indicates that Asian/Pacific Islander residents have a slightly lower risk of exposure to poverty. According to Table 10, Black residents have the highest poverty rate (32.56%), followed by Native American residents (29.58%), Hispanic residents (25.42%), Asian/Pacific Islander residents (14.43%), and White
53 residents, who have the lowest poverty rate (14.3%). Foreign-born residents of Victorville are slightly more likely than native-born resident to live below the poverty line.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Apple Valley has a slightly higher poverty rate overall (18.12%) than the region (16.82%), and Victorville has a highest rate (23.26%) of all three. In the region, there are similar disparities in poverty to Apple Valley and Victorville, with Native American, Black, and Hispanic residents more likely to live below the poverty line than Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents. In the region, like in Victorville, foreign-born residents are more likely to live below the poverty line than native-born residents.
Describe how the jurisdictions’ and region’s policies affect the ability of protected class groups to access low poverty areas.
Apple Valley:
The Town of Apple Valley relies upon the availability of Housing Choice Vouchers provided through the Housing Authority. Unfortunately, the waitlist for Apple Valley is rarely open. Further, federal funding for other housing programs is limited compared to private, market pressures on housing in the Town.
Victorville:
Access to lower poverty areas is limited to residents in Victorville because of the limited opportunities in labor, transportation and education. Further, housing has become less affordable over the past ten years – putting greater poverty pressure on hous eholds throughout the City.
Victorville is limited in providing access to low poverty areas via limited Housing Choice Vouchers and limited other funding for affordable housing and tenant based rental assistance programs.
Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by protected class groups.
54 Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes an Environmental Health Index, which captures the potential exposure to harmful toxins in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to harmful toxins, and therefore better environmental quality, in a neighborhood. Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental Health is a series of three maps showing the Environmental Health Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to harmful toxins and therefore higher environmental quality.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, Apple Valley residents of all racial/ethnic groups, including those living below the poverty line, have relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
Index values for all groups in Apple Valley are in the mid-70s.
As Map 13 shows, areas in southeast Apple Valley have the highest index values, while areas in the north and northwest of the jurisdiction have the lowest index values (meaning residents in the north/northwest have less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods than those in the southeast). The maps also show that residents of different race/ethnic groups and national origins, and families with children, are evenly dispersed throughout the areas with better and worse access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, meaning there are no apparent disparities based on those protected classes.
Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, Victorville residents of all racial/ethnic groups have relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Index values for all groups in Victorville are in the high 60s. The population below the poverty line generally has slightly less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods than the population as a whole: index values are in the mid 60s.
Map 13 shows that there is relatively uniform access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods across Victorville—most of the city has the same shading. The exceptions are one Census tract in the northwest, which has the high index value (i.e., is more environmentally healthy relative to other tracts), and two Census tracts in the center of the city—including one of the R/ECAPs— that have lower index values than other areas, meaning residents in those areas have less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. The maps do not show any concentration of race/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or families with children in the areas with better or worse access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents of all races/ethnicities in both Apple Valley and Victorville experience relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, though Apple Valley residents have slightly better access than their counterparts in Victorville. In comparison, the population in the region has much less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, and access varies significantly by race/ethnicity. Asian/Pacific Islander residents of the region have the least access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, with an index value of 35.12. Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line are slightly worse off, with an index value of 34.87, the lowest of any population group in the region. Native American and White residents in the region
55 have the most access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods of any group, with index values of 49.9 and 48.02, respectively, though they still have less access than residents of Apple Valley and Victorville.
56 57
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups have the least access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods?
The Environmental Health Index in Table 8 and Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental Health show that there is no significant disparity in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by race/ethnicity, national origin, or family status.
Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Identify and discuss any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and exposure to adverse community factors based on race/ethnicity, national origin, or familial status. Identify areas that experience an aggregate of poor access to opportunity and high exposure to adverse factors. Include how these patterns compare to patterns of segregation and R/ECAPs.
Apple Valley:
According to the above analysis, Apple Valley residents in general have relatively low access to high performing schools and employment opportunities, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, the analysis indicates that Black and Hispanic residents (especially those living below the poverty line), residents of Mexican origin, and families with children, are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high performing schools, high labor force participation, and high levels of human capital. These groups are also more likely to live in neighborhoods where they are exposed to poverty.
These same challenges are all present in Census tract 0097.16, which is the R/ECAP tract located in the center of the jurisdiction. This part of the jurisdiction has relatively low performing schools, low levels of labor force participation and human capital, and high levels of poverty.
The analysis shows that Black residents, families with children, and residents born in Mexico disproportionately reside in this R/ECAP.
Victorville:
According to the above analysis, all Victorville residents, regardless of protected class status, have relatively low access to high-performing schools, relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, there is evidence that different protected class groups face specific challenges regarding access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors.
For example:
• Native Americans, particularly those living below the poverty line, appear to be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville. According to ACS data, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate and the highest unemployment rate of any group.
• Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs, which may be related to the fact that more residents of
58 Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas. • Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs.
Disproportionate Housing Needs
Analysis
Which groups experience higher rates of housing cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing when compared to other groups? Which groups also experience higher rates of severe housing burdens when compared to other groups?
For the 2022 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), the Apple Valley-Victorville HOME Consortium analyzed 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data to determine if racial/ethnic groups at various income levels disproportionately experience any of the following four housing problems:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
• Overcrowding: A household is considered overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room.
• Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
According to the analysis in the ConPlan, at least one racial/ethnic group is disproportionately impacted by one or more of four housing problems in all income levels. Disproportionate impact means that a particular group is more likely to experience housing problems when compared to the population as a whole. As the chart below shows, among households in Apple Valley and Victorville that earn up to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Black, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic households are more likely than other households to experience at least one of the four housing problems listed above. Eighty-three percent (83%) of Black households, 100% of Pacific Islander households, and 77% of Hispanic households experience at least one housing problem.
In comparison, 63% of White households and 69% of Asian households experience at least one housing problem.
59 Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013- 2017 5- Year Estimates
The 2022 ConPlan also analyzes the disproportionate impact of severe housing problems by race/ethnicity. Similar to housing problems, severe housing problems are defined as:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven and refrigerator. • Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running water or modern toilets.
• Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
• Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
The chart below shows that, among Apple Valley and Victorville households that earn up to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Hispanic households are more likely than others to experience at least one of the four severe housing problems listed above. Forty-six percent (46%) of Hispanic households experience at least one severe housing problem. In comparison, 31% of White households, 25% of Black households, 34% of Asian households, and 0% of Pacific Islander households experience at least one severe housing problem.
60 Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013- 2017 5- Year Estimates
Which areas in the jurisdiction and region experience the greatest housing burdens? Which of these areas align with segregated areas, integrated areas, or R/ECAPs and what are the predominant race/ethnicity or national origin groups in such areas?
Map 6 – Housing Problems is a series of maps showing concentrations of households experiencing one or more housing burdens and population distribution by race/ethnicity and national origin, for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. On these maps, areas with darker shading have a higher percentage of households experiencing at least one housing burden.
Housing burdens in this context are the following: cost burden, defined as paying more than 30% of income for monthly housing costs including utilities; overcrowding; lacking a complete kitchen; and lacking plumbing.
Apple Valley:
The maps show that the northern and southeastern parts of Apple Valley have higher concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens, compared to other neighborhoods. Census tract 0097.10, in the southeast, has the highest concentration of households with housing burdens. In that area, 56.48% of households have at least one of the four housing burdens.
These maps also show there is no apparent concentration of specific racial/ethnic or national origin groups in the areas with high or low concentrations of housing burdens.
Victorville:
Map 6 shows that the southeastern part of Victorville has a higher concentration of families experiencing housing burdens than most other areas of the city. In these areas, which include two R/ECAPs, over 50% of families experience at least one housing burden. Census tract 0091.16, portions of which are in northwest Victorville, over 60% of families experience at least one housing burden. This Census tract is classified as a R/ECAP. The maps do not show any
61 concentrations of specific race/ethnic or national origin groups in the areas with more housing burdens.
Region:
In the region, there are high concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens to the near west of Apple Valley/Victorville, as well as farther to the northwest and south. Based on the scale of these maps, it is difficult to determine whether there are specific racial/ethnic or national origin groups concentrated in the areas with more housing burdens.
62 63
64 Describe the differences in rates of renter and owner-occupied housing by race/ethnicity in the jurisdiction and region.
Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity, below, shows the percentages of households that are renters and homeowners by race/ethnicity, for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, 65% of all households own their home, however there are significant disparities by race/ethnicity. The homeownership rate for Asian/Pacific Islander residents in Apple Valley is highest, at 80%. White households have a comparable homeownership rate of 71%. However, only 54% of Native Americans and Hispanic households own their home. For Black households, the homeownership rate is even lower, at 49%.
Victorville:
In Victorville, 54% of all households own their home and there are significant disparities by race/ethnicity. The homeownership rate for Asian/Pacific Islander residents in Apple Valley is highest, at 73%. White, Non-Hispanic households have the second highest homeownership rate, at 62%. Hispanic and Native American households have significantly lower homeownership rates, of 55% and 58%, respectively. Black households have the lowest rate of homeownership in the city: only 29% of Black households own their home.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Victorville residents in general are less likely to own their own home than residents of Apple Valley. Similar disparities by race/ethnicity are present in both jurisdictions. Black households are least likely to own their home, and Asian/Pacific Islander households, followed by White, Non-Hispanic households, are most likely to be homeowners.
In the region, the overall homeownership rate (62%) is slightly lower than Apple Valley’s but higher than Victorville’s. Disparities by race/ethnicity are also present in the region and align with the disparities present in Apple Valley and Victorville. Homeownership rates for White and Asian/Pacific Islander households are highest in the region (71% and 70%, respectively.
Homeownership rates for Black households in the region are the lowest, at 42%, which is still significantly higher than the Black homeownership rate in Victorville. The homeownership rate for Native Americans households is 52% and for Hispanic households it is 56%.
ATTACHMENT B
Citizen
Participation Plan
CITY OF VICTORVILLE - CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
Amended: May 5, 2020 (Amendments Underlined)
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Since 1997, the City of Victorville (the “City”) has received an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In 2003, the City formed a HOME Investment Partnership Program Consortium with the Town of Apple Valley (the “HOME Consortium”) in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME entitlement status with HUD. The City receives both CDBG and HOME funding annually.
As an Entitlement City, the City is required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The Con Plan is a plan of three to five years in length, which reviews and considers the housing and community development needs of the City, establishes priorities for CDBG and HOME funds, creates and institutes an Annual Action Plan (AP) for meeting current and future needs, and identifies the City’s performance in meeting its annual goals through the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
The AFH replaces the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) to assist the City in identifying fair housing issues and related contributing factors to achieve comprehensive community development goals and affirmatively further fair housing. The Con Plan, A P Plan and AFH are also required to have a strategy for resident and citizen participation in the planning process. According to 24 CFR § 91.105 and as a condition of federal funding , the City must adopt and follow a Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) describing how the City will encourage participation from residents and citizens of all ages, genders, economic levels, races, ethnicities and special needs to provide them with equal access in the development of the Con Plan, A P and AFH, and to ensure their issues and concerns are adequately addressed. Participation shall include community-based and regionally-based organizations that represent and assist protected class members and organizations that enforce fair housing laws.
II. PURPOSE OF THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
The purpose of the CPP is to provide the method and process by which the City’s Con Plan, AP and AFH processes will comply with the citizen participation requirements set forth by HUD pursuant to 24 CFR §
91.105 and the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Final Rule (24 CFR §§ 5.150 through 5.180). This CPP states the process of soliciting the views and recommendations from the public, as well as the process for incorporating public comments and views into the objectives and outcomes developed in the Con Plan, AP, and AFH. This CPP and the participation process shall be implemented and monitored by the City’s Development Department.
III. DEVELOPMENT OF AFH, CON PLAN, AP, AND CAPER; SUBSEQUENT
REVISIONS AND SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTS
Introductory Note. The citizen participation processes and procedures associated with each of the planning documents/reports discussed in this Section are detailed in Section V of this CPP and further described in tabular format on page 5 (the “Summary Table”).
2 Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The AFH is required every five years prior to the preparation of the Con Plan. When preparing an AFH , the City will make HUD -provided data and other supplemental information available to interested citizens, residents, agencies and organizations in an effort to provide meaningful analyses of local fair housing conditions and issues. The City shall publish a notice announcing the availability of this data /information and requesting the views of the residents at a public hearing at least ten (10) days prior to the date of such hearing. In addition, prior to the City adopting and submitting the final AFH to HUD, at least one thirty (30) day public comment period will be provided (after publication of notice and the draft AFH) and a second public hearing will be noticed and held to obtain further citizen input. The City may choose to conduct this hearing in conjunction with one of the two required public hearings on the Con Plan.
AFH Revisions. Pursuant to 24 CFR §5.164, t he City shall consider an AFH previously accepted by HUD to require modification (“Revisions”) and re-submission to HUD in the following instances:
When the City’s circumstances change in a way that affects the information on which the AFH is based, to the extent that the analysis, the fair housing contributing factors, or the priorities and goals of the AFH are no longer applicable or reflect actual circumstances. Examples of changed circumstances include:
o Presidentially declared disasters affecting the City that significantly impact the steps the City may need to take to affirmatively further fair housing; o Significant changes in the City’s demographic;
o The occurrence of new significant contributing factors in the City’s jurisdiction o civil rights findings, determinations, settlements (including Voluntary Compliance Agreements) or court orders
Upon HUD’s written notification specifying a material change that requires the Revisions Revisions may not necessarily require the submission of an entirely new AFH. Revisions need only focus on the material change and appropriate adjustments to the analy ses, assessments, priorities, or goals.
AFH Revisions will be published and noticed for public comment and hearing (see Summary Table).
Consolidated Plan (C on Plan); Annual Action Plan (AP) . The Con Plan examines housing and community development needs, sets priorities for grant monies and establishes a strategic plan with specific measurable goals to address priority needs. Prior to adopting the Con Plan or AP, the City will make available to citizens, public agencies, and other interested parties:
The amount of assistance the City expects to receive; The range of activities that may be undertaken with such funds; The amount of funds proposed to be used for activities and the estimated benefit to low and moderate income persons; and
The City’s plans to minimize displacement of persons and what type of assistance will be made available to those persons displaced.
At least one (1) public hearing will be noticed and held during the development of the Con Plan and AP to receive public comment and incorporate citizen participation . In addition, a second public hearing regarding the contents of the Con Plan / AP will be noticed and conducted prior to the City’s adoption of these documents and submission to HUD. Notices of such public hearings will be published at least ten (10) days in advance or as specified in the Summary Table. At least thirty (30) days prior to adoption, copies of the proposed Con Plan, AP, and any Substantial Amendments (defined below) will be published by the City (made available for publ ic review) and a thirty (30) day public comment period will be noticed and provided. The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to public noticing, public hearing, and publishing requirements in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
3 CAPER. At least fifteen (15) days prior to submission to HUD, copies of the CAPER will published and a like period of public comment will be noticed and provided.
Substantial Amendments . The occurrence of any of the following circumstances shal l require a modification of the Con Plan or AP (“Substantial Amendment”), which shall be noticed, heard, published for comment and adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section V of this CPP, as applicable:
A significant shift is proposed in allocation priorities, or a substantial change in the method of distributing funds;
An activity not included in the AP is proposed for funding; To use funds, including program income, not previously described in the Annual Action Plan; An activity included in the AP is proposed for elimination; The amount allocated to any activity is proposed to be increased or decreased from the amount described in the AP by more than 25%; or
Change in the location of the activity, target area, beneficiaries, eligibility c riteria, or general scope from that described in the AP.
IV. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS – OPPORTUNITIES AND PARTICIPATION Citizen Participation. Citizens and residents should be afforded the maximum feasible opportunity to :
provide input on housing and community development needs; address issues/problems affecting low- and moderate- income persons; learn about various programs available and the expected amount of assistance provided/allowed by each opportunity; develop local project proposals; give input to project selections and funding distributions; and participate in the implementation of funded activities. The procedures in this Section are designed to encourage persons of low and moderate income, particularly those per sons residing in slum and blighted and other City- targeted revitalization areas ; minorities; non-English speaking persons ; persons with disabilities ; persons with HIV/AIDS and their families ; and homeless persons to participate in the planning, implementat ion and assessment of the documents and reports described in this CPP . The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to the Public Participation process in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
Organizational Participation. In developing and implementing the Con Plan and AFH, the City shall encourage participation of local and regional institutions and government agencies; public housing authorities, adjoining cities; Continuums of Care; and other organizations (including businesses, developers, nonprofit organizations, philanthropic organizations, and community- based and faith- based organizations). In conjunction with consultation with public housing authorities, the City shall further encourage the residents of public and assisted housing developments, including their resident advisory boards, councils or management corporations, to participate in the development and implementation of the Con Plan and AFH. In addition to conducting required public hearings and providing public comment periods, the City will encourage citizen and organizational participation by conducting surveys, community outreach meetings, forming focus groups and engaging in other outreach processes. The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to the Organizational Participation process in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
V. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS – PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES
Public Hearings and Comment Periods . Public hearings provide citizens, residents and organiz ations with opportunities to make oral and/or written comments on community needs and on the various planning documents described herein. Public hearings and other meetings shall be held at times and in locations convenient to potential and actual program beneficiaries. Providing time periods during which citizens, residents and other members of the public are given the opportunity to submit written and oral comments on draft documents published by the City (“Comment Period(s)”) , further facilitates
4 community input and feedback. The requirements for publishing notices of public hearings and Comment Periods, as well as publication of draft documents , are detailed below and further explained in the Summary Table.
Noticing Public Hearings . To ensure citizens, residents, and organizations are advised in advance of opportunities to attend and participate in public hearings, all public hearing notices shall adhere to the following unless otherwise waived by HUD and approved by the City Manager or their designee. Be published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date (unless the public hearing notice is combined with a thirty (30) day public comment notice, in which case notice will be published at least thirty (30) days prior to the close of the public comment period and the date of the public hearing as further described in Noticing Public Comment Periods, below. Be published in one or more newspapers of general circulation (as legal notices and/or display ads)
Be prepared in a language other than English when a significant number of non- English residents can reasonably expected to participate
Include the time, date and place of the hearing, a descript ion of the subject/purpose of the hearing, and where associated documents (if applicable) are posted or may otherwise be obtained Include information on how to request special accommodations Be posted on the City’s website ( https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/legally-required- postings) on or before the date of publication
Be subject to the provision of additional forms of notice, including: posting and/or distributing notices at community locations such as the public library, hospitals, other public agency locations, specified locations at Victorville City Hall and in targe t neighborhoods; sending electronic mail to the EDDHD’s list of interested persons; and creation and distribution of supplemental flyers and/or mailers
Noticing Public Comment Periods . Comment Periods may be included in public hearing notices (provided the applicable advance comment period is accounted for). Comment Period notices shall adhere to the following unless otherwise waived by HUD and approved by the City Manager or their designee.
Be published prior to the commencement date of the applicable Comment Period Be published, prepared and posted in the manner provided for Noticing Public Hearings, above In cases where a public hearing is noticed in conjunction with a required Comment Period, provide for a Comment Period that ends prior to the date of the public hearing Include the time, date and place of any associated public hearing and how to request reasonable accommodations
Include the beginning and ending dates of the Comment Period; how and where comments may be submitted; a brief description of the subject matter/purpose of the document or item on which comment is being sought; a summary of the item or content of the documents; how/where full copies of any document(s) may be obtained; and the date the City Council will consider the approval of the item or document(s)
Be posted on the City’s website, various locations in and around City Hall, and in such other places as specified in Noticing Public Hearings, above
Publication of Draft Planning Documents . Notices of public hearings and Comment Periods shall contain summaries of the contents of any draft documents being provided for public review and comment (e.g., the AFH, Con Plan, AP and Revisions or Substantial Amendments). All such draft documents will be made available to members of the public “published” by the City by providing copies on its website, at City Hall, and in such other places as shall be specified in each applicable public hearing or Comment Period notice. Such notices will also contain instructions on how the public may request such documents in alternative formats for persons with disabilities.
5 Technical Assistance. Development Department staff will meet with groups or individuals representative of persons of low - and moderate -income upon request to provide them with technical assistance in commenting on the AFH, identifying specific needs, and/or developing/preparing project proposal applications for programs covered by the Con Plan.
6 Summary Table
Publication of Notices of Public Hearings and Comment Periods Document Publication of Public Hearing (PH) and
Comment Period (CP) Notices†
Minimum Number of
Public Hearings; Timing†
Comment
Period (CP)†
Con Plan /AP
PH Notice - At least 10 days†† prior to PH date
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
First Hearing:
Prior to drafting Con
Plan/AP
Second Hearing:
After publication of Con
Plan/AP draft and close of
CP
N/A
30 days
Substantial
Amendments
to Con Plan /
AP
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
One Hearing:
After publication of
Substantial Amendments
and close of CP
30 days
AFH
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
First Hearing:
After publication of HUD-
provided and other data
Second Hearing:
After publication of AFH
draft and close of CP (may
be combined with second
Con Plan hearing after
initial adoption of AFH)
N/A
30 days
AFH
Revisions
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
One Hearing:
After publication of draft
Revisions and close of CP
30 days
CAPER
CP Notice - At least 15 days prior to CP close
Not required
15 days
† All required noticing requirements, mandatory public hearings, and comment periods can be adjusted in accordance with any waivers provided by HUD, as approved by the City Manager or their designee. †† All references days in this Summary table refer to calendar days
7 Consideration of Public Comments/Views. Prior to adopting the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER and/or Revisions or Substantial Amendments, the City will consider any comments/view received from citizens and residents ( individuals or groups representing their interests) in writing during Comment Periods, or orally during public hearing(s). Such comments/views shall be summarized and attached to the final versions of the AFH, Con Plan, AP, any Revisions or Substantial Amendments, and the CAPE R as applicable.
Questions and Complaints. Development Department staff will answer all questions received from residents or their representative groups in the manner in which the questions were posed ( e.g., verbal responses to verbal requests, written responses to written requests). Written complaints and grievances received from residents or their representative groups relating to the Con Plan, AP, CAPER, AFH, and/or any Substantial Amendments or Revisions , shall be substantively responded to by Development Department staff within fifteen (15) working days of receipt, where practicable.
Access to / Availability of Records . The City will provide residents of the community, public agencies and other interested parties with reasonable and timely access to the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER, CPP, all Substantial Amendments or Revisions, and information/records related to these documents (including the use of assistance under the CDBG and HOME programs for the preceding five (5) years) by:
Maintaining copies at City Hall for public inspection and m aking a reasonable number of copies (paper or electronic) of the AFH , Con Plan and CPP available to residents and other groups that request them free of charge
Making copies of other documents and records available in accordance with the California Public Records Act (direct costs of duplication may apply) Posting these documents and related information on the City’s website Maintaining copies of the final versions of the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER and CPP on the City’s website, at City Hall and at the City’s Public Library Providing such documents and records in an accessible format for persons with disabilities, upon forty-eight (48) hours’ advance request
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); Accessibility. In compliance with the ADA, if special assistance to participate in public hearings and/or community or consultation meetings is needed, individuals should contact Development Department staff forty-eight ( 48) hours prior to the meeting or public hearing to ensure that the City will be able to make reasonable arrangements. Examples of assistance provided may include the following:
Auxiliary aids and services to communicate with people who have communication disabilities, such as providing a qualified reader; providing information on large print; or providing an audio recording of printed information for individuals who are blind, have vision loss, or are deaf-blind.
A “qualified” reader means someone who is able to read effectively, accurately, and impartially, using any necessary specialized vocabulary;
For people who are de af, have hearing loss, or are deaf -blind, the City may provide a qualified notetaker; a qualified sign language interpreter; written materials; or a printed script of a stock speech (such as given on a museum or historic house tour). A “qualified” interpre ter means someone who is able to interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially, both receptively ( i.e., understanding what the person with the disability is saying) and expressively (i.e., having the skill needed to convey information back to that person) using any necessary specialized vocabulary.
In addition, persons with disabilities may bring a “companion” to assist them. The term “companion” includes any family member, friend, or associate of a person who is an appropriate person with whom the City should communicate. Public hearings and other m eetings shall be held in areas that are handicap accessible and other accommodations shall be made upon request as noted above.
8 HUD Waivers. Should HUD temporarily suspend/adjust/waive any of the required noticing, comment or participation processes discussed herein regarding the development , review, or amendment of applicable assessments/plans, the City Manager or their designee may approve the application of any such waiver based upon a unique circumstance such as natural disaster, national emergency, state emergency, local emergency, major disaster declaration, etc. that necessitates the use of the waiver provided.
Review, Amendment and Availability of Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) . Prior to its adoption by the City Council, this CCP was made available for public review and comment and at least one public hearing was held. Future Substantial Amendments to the CPP will utilize the public hearing and Comment Period associated with the adoption of Substantial Amendments to the Con Plan.
Amended: May 5, 2020 (Amendments Underlined)
9 Community & Regionally Based Organizations
CHC California Housing Consortium
National Crime Prevention Council
National Coalition for the Homeless
Shelter Network
Latin-American Association
NAACP National Association for the Advancement of Colored People- California Branch NARF Native American Rights Fund
NOMAR National Organization for Mexican-American Rights Big Brothers Big Sisters
California Coalition for Youth
California Youth Advocacy Network
Americans United for Life
California Public Health Association – North
Department of Employment & Human Services
Department of Behavioral Health – San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership High Desert Homeless Services, Inc.
Victor Valley Domestic Violence, Inc.
Moses House Ministries
Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino
San Bernardino Sexual Assault Servicies
Victor Valley Community Services Council
ATTACHMENT C
2025-2026
CDBG/HOME
Allocations
City of Victorville 2025-2026 HUD Allocations
CDBG Allocation (City of Victorville)
NAME CDBG
Victorville $1,409,225
• Funding Categories
Public Service (15%) - $211,384
Construction (65%) - $915,996
Administration (20%) - $281,845
HOME Allocation (Consortium)
NAME ST. Share ($) Approx. Share (%)
VV & AV Consortium CA $752,310.33 100.0%
Victorville CA $508,362.83 67.57%
Apple Valley CA $243,947.50 32.43%
• Consortium Total Allocation - $752,310.33
o Funding Categories
Housing Activities (75%) - $564,232.33
CHDO (15%) - $112,847.00
Administration (10%) - $75,231.00
• Victorville Total Allocation – 67.57% = $508,362.83
o Funding Categories
Housing Activities (75%) - $381,271.33
CHDO (15%) - $76,255
Administration (10%) - $50,836.50
* (Pursuant to Consortium Agreement, City eligible to receive half of total HOME Consortium administrative allowance, or $25,418.00)
• Apple Valley Total Allocation – 32.43% = $243,947.50
o Funding Categories
Housing Activities (75%) - $182,961.00
CHDO (15%) - $36,592.00
Administration (5%) - $24,395.00
Administration - Victorville share - $25,418.50
Item Number: 2
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Subject:
City Council Members’ Proof of Residency
Recommendation:
That the City Council receive the proof of residency information as provided herein.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Discussion:
City Council Policy and Procedure Manual, Chapter 2, Section IV A states, A. Annual Review of Residency
“Government Code Section 36502(a) requires Councilmembers of this City to maintain a legal residence or domicile within the City of Victorville and rules regarding this are further discussed in Section 243 and 244 of the Government Code. To properly ensure compliance, Councilmembers shall be required to certify with the City Clerk annually, their residency or domicile within the City of Victorville. To be considered certified, each proof of residency as described below must contain the house number (and apartment number if applicable) and street name of the residency or domicile in an unredacted state.
Councilmembers are required to live in the District they represent and are required to live in the City of Victorville during their entire term in office. To ensure that the Councilmembers continue to live in the area they represent, each elected official must submit one of the following documents to the City Clerk during the first 31 calendar days of the year (January 1st to 31st) and 4 5
4 2
within 30 days of any change in residency. Acceptable forms for proof of residency are as follows:
1. Home Ownership. Proof as follows:
(a)a copy of a title deed or grant deed, a mortgage payment billing statement verifying the address, or any other document that can verify home ownership and residency of the property, or (b)evidence of a homeowner's property tax exemption filed with the County of San Bernardino Assessor for proof that the home is his or her primary residence. If the elected official does not have a tax exemption on file, he or she must submit an affidavit signed by the elected official verifying that the home is the primary residence; or
(c)If the home ownership is in the name of a person other than the elected official, or in the name of a legal entity, such as a trust, partnership or corporation, the elected official must submit an affidavit signed by the homeowner or authorized legal representative of the entity verifying that the elected official is living in the home as his or her primary residence.
2. Rented or Leased Property. Proof as follows:
(a)If the residence is rented or leased by the elected official, the elected official will provide proof of residency by submitting a signed copy of a current and legally enforceable lease or rental agreement that demonstrates the elected official resides at the specified address; or
(b)If an elected official is living at a residence without a lease/rental agreement, the elected official must have the landlord or property owner sign an affidavit verifying, under penalty of perjury, the elected official's residency in the landlord or owner's property.
4 5
4 2
3. Current Motor Vehicle Registration or California Driver’s License. Proof as follows:
(a)Motor vehicle registration showing it is registered to the elected official for the residence claimed, or
(b)a valid California driver's license showing that the address on his or her license matches the residence claimed.
If the residence address on either the driver's license or auto registration is in the process of being changed, the elected official must provide a document from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (Form DMC14) verifying the change is in fact in process. If the elected official does not own an automobile or does not have a California driver's license, the elected official must submit any other State-of- California-issued identification showing that the address on the identification document is consistent with the address shown on his or her current voter registration.
4. Current Utility Bill. Proof as follows:
(a)The utility bill must be in the elected member's name and show that the service address is within the Councilmember’s
respective District. In the event a utility bill has yet to be generated, a letter from an authorized representative of the utility provider stating that an account has been opened in the elected official's name will suffice. If there is an agreement with a landlord or other legal entity, as verified by a rental contract or lease contract, that states the landlord or other legal entity will pay the utility bill, the elected official must submit an affidavit signed by the landlord or other legal entity's authorized representative, attesting to that fact.
5. Other Documents. Proof as follows:
(a)School records or any official document issued by an accredited educational institution, sealed by the school, or (b)current paycheck stub or personnel record issued by the elected official's employer, or
4 5
4 2
(c)current homeowner or renter insurance policy, or
(d)current documents issued by any California court or a federal court that lists the name of the elected official and his or her residence address, or
(e)Original record issued by any state or national bank, state or federal savings association, trust company, industrial loan company, state or federal credit union, or any institution or entity that has issued a credit card.
In addition to 5 (a)-(e) above, the elected official must sign an affidavit attesting, under penalty of perjury, his or her current place of residence.
In the event a Councilmember moves to a new residence within the District after filing any previous affidavit, the elected official must confirm the new address within 30 days of moving by providing one of the documents listed in items 1 through 5 and an affidavit to the City Clerk.
Incumbent Councilmembers who have not relocated since the information required by this Section was last provided may comply with this Section by supplying a copy of a current driver's license or State- of-California-issued identification card and an affidavit attesting, under penalty of perjury, that they have not relocated and that all previously submitted information remains true and correct. The City Clerk shall confirm that the residence address on the incumbent’s voter registration is consistent with previous documents submitted in order to demonstrate the residence address is within the boundaries of the District in which the Councilmember was elected or appointed to office.
Failure to provide any of the above-required documents on or before January 31st of each year and/or within 30 days of moving to a new residence shall be referred to the City Council for further action and could result in his or her office becoming vacant in accordance with Government Code Section 36502, and the City Council could take an action to remove said Councilmember.
4 5
4 2
Government Code Section 36502(a) provides:
“A person is not eligible to hold office as councilmember … unless he or she is at the time of assuming the office an elector of the city, and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate.… If, during his or her term of office, he or she moves his or her place of residence outside of the city limits or ceases to be an elector of the city, his or her office shall immediately become vacant.” Alternatively, for non-compliance with this Section, the Council may consider taking action to remove the Councilmember from committee assignments and access to public facilities outside of normal working hours and/or initiate an investigation to determine the Councilmember’s place of residence.
In order to ensure compliance with these requirements, City staff shall provide an update as to compliance in February of each year as part of a February consent calendar item.”
The City Clerk reached out to Council Members on January 5, 2026, regarding the annual review of residency requirement. To date, the following documents have been provided.
Council Member Documents Provided District
Mayor Becerra California Driver License 3
Mayor Pro Tem
Harriman
California Driver License 4
Council Member Gaudin Utility Bill 1
Council Member Irving California Driver License 5
Council Member Mora California Driver License 2
Staff remains available for any questions or comments you might have.
Attachments: None
Item Number: 3
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 for the period of January 08, 2026, through January 21, 2026, in total amount of $7,709,516.61. This total includes:
Electronic Fund Transfers No. 347502 through 347649 and Warrant No. 802511 through 802658 in the amount of $7,709,516.61.
All are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
Fiscal Impact:
The total fiscal impact of $7,709,516.61 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the total funds paid to vendors.
Background:
Pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code (2.24.080) the attached demands were presented by the departments, audited by the Finance Department and subsequent warrants/wire transfers were issued. All were found to be in conformity to City policies and procedures and funds were budgeted or available to pay said demands. A list of commercial warrants and wire transfers is now being presented to the City Council for approval.
Prepared By:
Cecilia Alonzo, Senior Account Clerk
Attachments: A. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 Check Register Summary
ATTACHMENT A:
Commercial Demand
Schedule No. 15 Check
Register Summary
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 01/21/2026 14:29
User: calonzo
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 347502 01/14/2026 EFT 010537 ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, 6,891.00 347503 01/14/2026 EFT 014856 AGRI-CON HYDRAULICS 758.50 347504 01/14/2026 EFT 023793 CALIFORNIA WIND MEMBER, L 57,943.14 347505 01/14/2026 EFT 022271 ASHTON, STEVE 993.53 347507 01/14/2026 EFT 017968 AVCOM SERVICES, INC. 345.00 347508 01/14/2026 EFT 021548 BASE HILL, INC. 4,970.00 347509 01/14/2026 EFT 003638 BECERRA, ELIZABETH 766.53 347510 01/14/2026 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 7,976.74 347511 01/14/2026 EFT 010986 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNN 4,454.76 347512 01/14/2026 EFT 021414 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS 749.00 347513 01/14/2026 EFT 003245 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 145.00 347514 01/14/2026 EFT 009761 CALIFITNESS, INC. 455.00 347515 01/14/2026 EFT 002720 CTWS, LLC 1,481.09 347516 01/14/2026 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 3,676.52 347517 01/14/2026 EFT 001162 CAZCOM, INC. 663.50 347518 01/14/2026 EFT 016335 CHARTER COMMUNICATION HOL 19,265.96 347519 01/14/2026 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 2,256.56 347520 01/14/2026 EFT 000662 NANCY K BOHL INC. 1,200.00 347521 01/14/2026 EFT 023070 C. WELLS PIPELINE MATERIA 5,165.63 347522 01/14/2026 EFT 023281 STEADY MOVEMENT LLC 206.88 347523 01/14/2026 EFT 022345 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SER 449.35 347524 01/14/2026 EFT 005295 DOKKEN ENGINEERING 12,702.50 347525 01/14/2026 EFT 000826 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION 674.61 347526 01/14/2026 EFT 024027 EAGLESHIELD PEST CONTROL, 1,485.00 347527 01/14/2026 EFT 021797 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT 1,500.29 347529 01/14/2026 EFT 019731 EL DORADO BROADCASTERS LL 5,708.00 347530 01/14/2026 EFT 014356 ELECTRA-MEDIA, INC 2,589.15 347531 01/14/2026 EFT 023466 ESPINO FAMILY ENTERPRISES 5,000.00 347532 01/14/2026 EFT 024096 FAMCON PIPE & SUPPLY INC. 13,138.52 347533 01/14/2026 EFT 017560 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 173.38 347534 01/14/2026 EFT 017560 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 87,577.02 347535 01/14/2026 EFT 005127 FLIGHT LIGHT, INC. 2,459.96 347536 01/14/2026 EFT 020290 FORBES GRAPHX & SIGNS 906.98 347537 01/14/2026 EFT 000975 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS, INC 82.67 347538 01/14/2026 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 171.64 347539 01/14/2026 EFT 023898 G & M AUTOMOTIVE CENTER, 215.00 347540 01/14/2026 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 192.31 347541 01/14/2026 EFT 000031 GARCIA, JOHN 79.80 347542 01/14/2026 EFT 023715 HEMET MANUFACTURING COMPA 125,453.84 347543 01/14/2026 EFT 001063 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 8,187.99 347544 01/14/2026 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 163.71 347545 01/14/2026 EFT 001104 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 664.55 347546 01/14/2026 EFT 021166 HARKEY, DAWN MARIE 150.00 347547 01/14/2026 EFT 028225 HESPERIA OUTDOOR POWER EQ 471.87 347548 01/14/2026 EFT 001206 HITT PLUMBING INC. 3,277.00 347549 01/14/2026 EFT 010777 ICONIX WATERWORKS (US) IN 6,154.59 347550 01/14/2026 EFT 024922 INFOSEND, INC 125.19 347551 01/14/2026 EFT 023134 JTB SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. 4,089.00 347552 01/14/2026 EFT 022001 KERN RIVER GAS TRANSMISSI 4,340.00 347553 01/14/2026 EFT 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 2,862.46 347554 01/14/2026 EFT 004986 LESLIE'S SWIMMING POOL SU 231.45 347555 01/14/2026 EFT 001548 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 281.75
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 01/21/2026 14:29
User: calonzo
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 347556 01/14/2026 EFT 014157 MERRIMAC ENERGY GROUP 15,466.72 347557 01/14/2026 EFT 015804 MISSION AMBULANCE, INC. 362,735.00 347558 01/14/2026 EFT 019967 MOJAVE AUTO COLLISION 2,814.45 347559 01/14/2026 EFT 014011 MYERS AND SONS HI-WAY SAF 45.45 347560 01/14/2026 EFT 024434 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 1,904.22 347561 01/14/2026 EFT 008568 NBS GOVERNMENT FINANCE GR 1,353.20 347562 01/14/2026 EFT 009644 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY I 428.82 347563 01/14/2026 EFT 013165 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE 2,582.69 347564 01/14/2026 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 503.40 347565 01/14/2026 EFT 018886 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 73,382.18 347566 01/14/2026 EFT 024930 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DI 391.88 347567 01/14/2026 EFT 020842 ALL PURPOSE FIRE EXT. COR 232.50 347568 01/14/2026 EFT 002063 SBC FIRE DEPARTMENT 449.52 347569 01/14/2026 EFT 017252 SDC ENGINEERING, INC 189,715.00 347570 01/14/2026 EFT 002123 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 217.54 347571 01/14/2026 EFT 023757 SMART & FINAL HOLDINGS, I 245.04 347572 01/14/2026 EFT 022247 SYMBA CENTER 117,893.57 347573 01/14/2026 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 589.19 347574 01/14/2026 EFT 014914 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPE 396.69 347575 01/14/2026 EFT 002419 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 918.67 347576 01/14/2026 EFT 014536 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF C 2,881.67 347577 01/14/2026 EFT 015004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 7,554.93 347578 01/14/2026 EFT 015079 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 31,574.42 347579 01/14/2026 EFT 023792 VERTEX CIVIL LLC 323,377.15 347580 01/14/2026 EFT 008430 CALMAT COMPANY 269.71 347581 01/14/2026 EFT 002498 VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER 1,706,132.37 347582 01/14/2026 EFT 006861 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING, 15,026.60 347583 01/14/2026 EFT 002554 WAXIE'S ENTERPRISES, LLC, 1,841.54 347584 01/14/2026 EFT 018301 WESTERN WATER WORKS SUPPL 4,401.12 347585 01/14/2026 EFT 007786 WILLIAMS, MONIQUE 855.00 347586 01/14/2026 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 12,738.95 347587 01/21/2026 EFT 021302 AAA CONTAINER SALES AND R 174.00 347588 01/21/2026 EFT 010537 ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, 471.39 347589 01/21/2026 EFT 000004 LITTLEFIELD, DAVID S. 725.00 347590 01/21/2026 EFT 014305 ALBERT A .WEBB ASSOCIATES 33,456.61 347591 01/21/2026 EFT 024216 AMERICAN GLOBAL SECURITY, 11,077.00 347592 01/21/2026 EFT 023793 CALIFORNIA WIND MEMBER, L 40,521.00 347593 01/21/2026 EFT 000165 ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC 102.00 347594 01/21/2026 EFT 017968 AVCOM SERVICES, INC. 615.00 347596 01/21/2026 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 33,398.03 347597 01/21/2026 EFT 024102 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, 1,483,866.40 347598 01/21/2026 EFT 016222 CACEO 100.00 347599 01/21/2026 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 874.62 347600 01/21/2026 EFT 004751 COCKRUM, DAVID J. 1,853.74 347601 01/21/2026 EFT 017738 CONSOLIDATED FIRE AGENCIE 350,506.50 347602 01/21/2026 EFT 016340 CONSUMERS PIPE & SUPPLY C 16,598.69 347603 01/21/2026 EFT 023677 ECOTEL LLC 32,772.40 347604 01/21/2026 EFT 014122 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 1,690.72 347605 01/21/2026 EFT 015760 FASTENAL COMPANY 4,339.34 347606 01/21/2026 EFT 017560 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 210.60 347607 01/21/2026 EFT 017560 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 80,448.44 347608 01/21/2026 EFT 011206 FLYERS ENERGY LLC 340.39
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 01/21/2026 14:29
User: calonzo
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 347609 01/21/2026 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 455.99 347610 01/21/2026 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 40.53 347611 01/21/2026 EFT 022275 GASKELL TEP LLC 70,786.08 347612 01/21/2026 EFT 017444 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SER 700.00 347613 01/21/2026 EFT 001063 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 1,398.41 347614 01/21/2026 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 1,048.62 347615 01/21/2026 EFT 016317 GREATER HOPE FOUNDATION F 200.00 347616 01/21/2026 EFT 006269 GREEN, DE BORTNOWSKY, LLP 89,807.56 347617 01/21/2026 EFT 023053 SPARKS, STEPHANIE VICTORI 896.00 347618 01/21/2026 EFT 017752 HATTRIX INC. 171.15 347619 01/21/2026 EFT 028225 HESPERIA OUTDOOR POWER EQ 3,582.73 347620 01/21/2026 EFT 000278 HI DESERT ALARM 179.45 347621 01/21/2026 EFT 021594 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 2,433.84 347622 01/21/2026 EFT 024922 INFOSEND, INC 8,054.63 347623 01/21/2026 EFT 001282 INLAND KENWORTH, INC. 533.55 347624 01/21/2026 EFT 022747 KELLEY'S UNDERGROUND CONS 49,607.00 347625 01/21/2026 EFT 021689 THINKNETIC MEDICAL CORPOR 940.00 347626 01/21/2026 EFT 019967 MOJAVE AUTO COLLISION 648.25 347627 01/21/2026 EFT 001595 MOJAVE BASIN AREA WATERMA 37,578.03 347628 01/21/2026 EFT 001599 MOJAVE DESERT AQMD 1,291.50 347629 01/21/2026 EFT 024434 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 1,947.70 347630 01/21/2026 EFT 008568 NBS GOVERNMENT FINANCE GR 4,250.00 347631 01/21/2026 EFT 028213 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 489.29 347632 01/21/2026 EFT 021374 PENCCO, INC 6,458.14 347633 01/21/2026 EFT 013165 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE 598.95 347635 01/21/2026 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 343.83 347636 01/21/2026 EFT 022609 RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSUL 22,213.00 347637 01/21/2026 EFT 020678 UNITED SAFETY SERVICES 130.34 347638 01/21/2026 EFT 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 20,446.00 347639 01/21/2026 EFT 015670 SCORPION FIRE PROTECTION, 14,175.00 347640 01/21/2026 EFT 002123 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 138.61 347641 01/21/2026 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 315.00 347642 01/21/2026 EFT 002790 TREADWELL, KENNETH R. 10,000.00 347643 01/21/2026 EFT 000095 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC. 9,089.48 347644 01/21/2026 EFT 008430 CALMAT COMPANY 3,307.75 347645 01/21/2026 EFT 002498 VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER 22,606.90 347646 01/21/2026 EFT 018955 WASHEX MACHINERY OF CALIF 595.00 347647 01/21/2026 EFT 002554 WAXIE'S ENTERPRISES, LLC, 6,287.54 347648 01/21/2026 EFT 000208 WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORD 125.00 347649 01/21/2026 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 119,376.01 802511 01/14/2026 PRINTED 002201 AAAE 495.00 802512 01/14/2026 PRINTED 015132 ACEVEDO, FELIX 225.00 802513 01/14/2026 PRINTED 011148 APPLE VALLEY TRANSFER & S 60.00 802514 01/14/2026 PRINTED 017048 ARAMBURO, JESSE 155.36 802515 01/14/2026 PRINTED 017680 AUTOZONE, INC. 140.26 802516 01/14/2026 PRINTED 000290 BATTERY MART OF APPLE VAL 3,362.70 802517 01/14/2026 PRINTED 023585 BLUSKY RESTORATION CONTRA 72,376.41 802518 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024102 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, 18,791.28 802519 01/14/2026 PRINTED 017562 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. 2,940.00 802520 01/14/2026 PRINTED 000787 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIO 28,144.65 802521 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024262 CANON U.S.A. INC. 36,663.15 802522 01/14/2026 PRINTED 017057 CARTER, LEONARD 375.00
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 01/21/2026 14:29
User: calonzo
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 802523 01/14/2026 PRINTED 006339 CASC ENGINEERING AND CONS 310.00 802524 01/14/2026 PRINTED 014721 CORE & MAIN LP 12,311.94 802525 01/14/2026 PRINTED 010314 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATE 7,255.23 802526 01/14/2026 PRINTED 022946 DELGADO, STEVEN 2,236.13 802527 01/14/2026 PRINTED 022422 ERNIE'S AUTO SERVICE CORP 1,917.61 802528 01/14/2026 PRINTED 023681 ESQUIVEL, IVANIA 2,990.00 802529 01/14/2026 PRINTED 004581 FLEETPRIDE 967.86 802530 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024012 GARGAN, JONATHAN 154.30 802531 01/14/2026 PRINTED 021367 GIBSON, DANIEL 873.67 802532 01/14/2026 PRINTED 019796 GLEASON, EDWARD D 979.25 802533 01/14/2026 PRINTED 018757 GRANICUS, LLC. 8,199.00 802534 01/14/2026 PRINTED 001172 JORDAN, RICHARD 590.00 802535 01/14/2026 PRINTED 017053 HIGH DESERT LOCK & SAFE, 605.19 802536 01/14/2026 PRINTED 016178 HENNIGAR, DOUGLAS 201.64 802537 01/14/2026 PRINTED 013762 HESPERIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 400.00 802538 01/14/2026 PRINTED 001155 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY 7.54 802539 01/14/2026 PRINTED 001229 HOWARDS MUFFLER SERVICE, 550.00 802540 01/14/2026 PRINTED 022573 HYDROTEK INDUSTRIES 350.00 802541 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024022 J.R. MILLER & ASSOCIATES, 235.00 802542 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024123 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, I 3,800.71 802543 01/14/2026 PRINTED 004807 KONE, INC. 373.12 802544 01/14/2026 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA 238.87 802545 01/14/2026 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 1,901.51 802546 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999984 LUTZ, ARNOLD 2,610.24 802547 01/14/2026 PRINTED 022244 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 990.00 802548 01/14/2026 PRINTED 023592 LIVEVIEW TECHNOLOGIES, IN 13,593.75 802549 01/14/2026 PRINTED 001424 LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATE 52.08 802550 01/14/2026 PRINTED 010660 LOVELAND'S AUTOMOTIVE SER 1,743.25 802551 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999985 MGM ENERGY 156.31 802552 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999985 MGM ENERGY 92.89 802553 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999985 MGM ENERGY 92.89 802554 01/14/2026 PRINTED 018557 MAHONEY-HENSON, DARCY 2,924.45 802555 01/14/2026 PRINTED 000361 MARK BROWN & ASSOCIATES, 273.50 802556 01/14/2026 PRINTED 015830 MDG ASSOCIATES, INC 67.00 802557 01/14/2026 PRINTED 019791 MIGUEL, NATHANIEL 19.56 802558 01/14/2026 PRINTED 016208 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC 1,299.03 802559 01/14/2026 PRINTED 022947 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS 2,380.30 802560 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999987 OPTION ONE SOLAR 329.49 802561 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999987 OPTION ONE SOLAR 329.49 802562 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999987 OPTION ONE SOLAR 329.03 802563 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999987 OPTION ONE SOLAR 319.03 802564 01/14/2026 PRINTED 022866 ONECREDITSOURCE.COM 20.74 802565 01/14/2026 PRINTED 017735 PATTERSON, PATRICK 230.59 802566 01/14/2026 PRINTED 021481 VELASCO,JOSEPH 8,547.25 802567 01/14/2026 PRINTED 014355 QUINN COMPANY 4,471.02 802568 01/14/2026 PRINTED 002746 ROTO ROOTER PLUMBERS 2,274.00 802569 01/14/2026 PRINTED 020899 RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF CAL 141.38 802570 01/14/2026 PRINTED 999991 SEMPER SOLARIS 417.08 802571 01/14/2026 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 26.00 802572 01/14/2026 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 26.00 802573 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024212 SCELZI ENTERPRISES 138,003.64 802574 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024367 PACE ENTERPRISES 4,818.56
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 01/21/2026 14:29
User: calonzo
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 802575 01/14/2026 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 372,437.81 802576 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024609 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 586.82 802577 01/14/2026 PRINTED 002269 SUNLAND FORD 1,292.02 802578 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024450 TEMECULA CARRIAGE COMPANY 10,000.00 802579 01/14/2026 PRINTED 021687 TITANS COMPLIANCE TESTING 1,000.00 802580 01/14/2026 PRINTED 006279 TURF STAR, INC. 1,715.30 802581 01/14/2026 PRINTED 022706 RED BARN MEDIA, INC. 657.00 802582 01/14/2026 PRINTED 022386 VEGA, DAVID 30.41 802583 01/14/2026 PRINTED 002486 VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH 4,000.00 802584 01/14/2026 PRINTED 001147 WAGE WORKS 699.00 802585 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024215 AVNI ENTERPRISES, INC. 339.49 802586 01/14/2026 PRINTED 029510 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 364.47 802587 01/14/2026 PRINTED 023128 ZAMORA, ASHLEY 1,880.00 802588 01/14/2026 PRINTED 003042 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIO 474.38 802589 01/14/2026 PRINTED 030521 EDF INC. 73,447.03 802590 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024530 AAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA E 100.48 802591 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024528 BOGNER, CHARLES 27.56 802592 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024524 CLEARVIEW REAL ESTATE HOL 73.16 802593 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024525 LAM, THAI & HANH FAMILY T 26.02 802594 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024522 LU, JOHN 103.45 802595 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024527 RAWLINGS, SONIKA 220.00 802596 01/14/2026 PRINTED 015394 REAL ESTATE UNLIMITED 21.22 802597 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024523 REO WEALTH INC 61.18 802598 01/14/2026 PRINTED 007943 TK CONSTRUCTION 689.88 802599 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024520 UYEHARA, SHANNON 152.22 802600 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024521 VMJ INVESTMENTS LLC 100.98 802601 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024526 WGAV INVESTMENT LLC 12.62 802602 01/14/2026 PRINTED 024529 ZHENG, YANRONG 66.16 802603 01/21/2026 PRINTED 016435 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICE 1,297.85 802604 01/21/2026 PRINTED 017680 AUTOZONE, INC. 26.09 802605 01/21/2026 PRINTED 003042 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIO 1,582.68 802606 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024111 B9 SELECT HOLDINGS TRS LL 3,728.81 802607 01/21/2026 PRINTED 000290 BATTERY MART OF APPLE VAL 535.39 802608 01/21/2026 PRINTED 023067 BEAR VALLEY ANIMAL HOSPIT 480.00 802609 01/21/2026 PRINTED 017353 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 4,625.39 802610 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024102 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, 100,191.79 802611 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024102 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, 351.25 802612 01/21/2026 PRINTED 006657 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTIL 3,270.00 802613 01/21/2026 PRINTED 023953 DM CONTRACTING, INC. 26,538.35 802614 01/21/2026 PRINTED 013384 LASTAND, INC. 160.00 802615 01/21/2026 PRINTED 020022 GREATER HIGH DESERT CHAMB 1,050.00 802616 01/21/2026 PRINTED 001155 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY 48.12 802617 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024534 HEXAGON AGILITY FLEETCARE 90.69 802618 01/21/2026 PRINTED 023130 HUNTINGTON BEACH ELECTRIC 9,900.00 802619 01/21/2026 PRINTED 022573 HYDROTEK INDUSTRIES 350.00 802620 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024413 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION 807.58 802621 01/21/2026 PRINTED 023031 INTEGRATED SUPPLY NETWORK 886.28 802622 01/21/2026 PRINTED 020667 CONDON, JOSEPH 16,900.00 802623 01/21/2026 PRINTED 021978 LAW OFFICE OF PETER KIEL 3,280.50 802624 01/21/2026 PRINTED 001416 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 22.82 802625 01/21/2026 PRINTED 001439 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITI 36,151.00 802626 01/21/2026 PRINTED 015232 LOGICALIS, INC 12,467.60
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 01/21/2026 14:29
User: calonzo
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 802627 01/21/2026 PRINTED 017054 LOOPNET, INC. 262.00 802628 01/21/2026 PRINTED 021161 CAR WASH PARTNERS, LLC. 368.00 802629 01/21/2026 PRINTED 001592 MOBILE OCCUPATIONAL SERVI 230.00 802630 01/21/2026 PRINTED 023015 MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC. 306,531.62 802631 01/21/2026 PRINTED 016208 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC 1,899.84 802632 01/21/2026 PRINTED 022212 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO. 9,146.46 802633 01/21/2026 PRINTED 023633 INTELLIGENCE PRESS, INC. 18,731.00 802634 01/21/2026 PRINTED 017735 PATTERSON, PATRICK 751.02 802635 01/21/2026 PRINTED 022183 HINRICHS, DARREN 478.38 802636 01/21/2026 PRINTED 021481 VELASCO,JOSEPH 3,689.50 802637 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024531 JAIME CASAS 4,500.00 802638 01/21/2026 PRINTED 021758 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL 3,995.00 802639 01/21/2026 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 883.00 802640 01/21/2026 PRINTED 018967 SESAC RIGHTS MANAGEMENT, 3,030.00 802641 01/21/2026 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 89,430.30 802642 01/21/2026 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 52,491.05 802643 01/21/2026 PRINTED 022830 SOUTHEAST EXHIBITS & EVEN 20,184.42 802644 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024609 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 3,782.28 802645 01/21/2026 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 30,969.00 802646 01/21/2026 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 135,544.64 802647 01/21/2026 PRINTED 023916 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC. 13,727.50 802648 01/21/2026 PRINTED 015840 ULTIMATE TINT & WHEEL 6,953.00 802649 01/21/2026 PRINTED 022706 RED BARN MEDIA, INC. 450.00 802650 01/21/2026 PRINTED 023108 VCA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,591.64 802651 01/21/2026 PRINTED 029510 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 27.54 802652 01/21/2026 PRINTED 020344 SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC. 1,196.00 802653 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024059 BALFOUR BEATTY INFRASTRUC 5,856.00 802654 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024224 PROACTIVE WORK HEALTH MED 1,205.00 802655 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024537 47 HARTFORD LLC 75.25 802656 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024539 ICELAND REVOCABLE TRUST 6 111.11 802657 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024540 RAMSEY, SHARON D 27.52 802658 01/21/2026 PRINTED 024538 SKYAZUL FAMILY TRUST 11/1 89.92 292 CHECKS CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL 7,709,516.61 .00 Item Number: 4
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 20560
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve a 20-percent release of the Water, Drainage, Street, and Traffic Signal Faithful Performance Improvement Securities for Tract Map No. 20560; and (2) Accept the completed Water, Drainage, Street, and Traffic Signal public improvements.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E, Invest in Infrastructure, in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs. This
Background:
Tract Map No. 20560 is a commercial tract map for the Victorville Connection, located on the north side of Bear Valley Road between Second Avenue and Third Avenue. The project proposes a mixed-use development consisting of 376 multi-family residential units and approximately 230,632 square feet of commercial space. The commercial component will accommodate a variety of uses, including retail, restaurant, office, and storage facilities.
On April 4, 2022, the City Council approved a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA), secured by both improvements and cash security, with Bear Valley Development Company, LLC, and Bear Valley Road and 2nd Avenue, LLC for the development. The 4 5
4 6
conditions of approval for the tract required the developer to complete several infrastructure components, those components being water, drainage, street, traffic signal, and monumentation improvements. The developer has made significant progress on the tract development and at the November 19, 2024, regularly scheduled City Council meeting 60-percent of the Water, Drainage, Street, and Traffic Signal Faithful Performance Securities were released.
Discussion:
The developer has completed all outstanding public improvements for Tract Map No. 20560. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve an additional 20- percent reduction in the Faithful Performance Securities, resulting in an overall 80-percent reduction as this aligns with the Victorville Municipal Code (VMC) Section 17.64.070(1) and accept the completed water, drainage, street, and traffic signal public improvements.
The remaining 20-percent of the Faithful Performance Securities will be held for the one- year warranty period as stipulated in the VMC Section 17.64.070(4).
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Prepared By:
Nicoale Sylvestre, Management Specialist
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table
C. Existing Securities
Attachment A
Vicinity Map
Attachment B
Securities Table
Securities Table
Water, Drainage, Street, Traffic Signal & Monumentation Bond Totals:
Faithful Performance Security
Water Improvement Bond No. - 100026095 Labor & Materials Security Water Improvement Bond No. - 10026095
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $36,180.00 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $18,090.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $14,472.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $18,090.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $7,236.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $7,236.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $18,090.00 Faithful Performance Security
Drainage Improvement Bond No. - 100026095 Labor & Materials Security Drainage Improvement Bond No. - 100026095
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $15,175.00 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $7,587.50 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $6,070.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $7,587.50 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $3,035.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $3,035.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $7,587.50 Faithful Performance Security
Street Improvement Bond No. - 100026095 Labor & Materials Security Street Improvement Bond No. - 100026095
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $674,182.00 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $337,091.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $269,672.80 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $337,091.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $134,836.40 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $134,836.40 Amount of Security REMAINING: $337,091.00 Faithful Performance Security
Traffic Signal Improvement Bond No. - 100026095 Labor & Materials Security Traffic Signal Improvement Bond No. - 100026095
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $869,063.00 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $434,531.50 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $347,625.20 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $434,531.50 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $173,812.60 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $173,812.60 Amount of Security REMAINING: $434,531.50 Securities Table
Water, Drainage, Street, Traffic Signal & Monumentation Bond Totals:
Developer:
Bear Valley Development Company, LLC
Bear Valley Road and 2nd Avenue, LLC
12300 Wilshire Blvd #410
Los Angeles, Ca 90025
Faithful Performance Security
Monumentation Improvement – Cash Bond
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $4,092.00
Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $4,092.00
Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00
Amount of Security REMAINING: $4,092.00
Attachment C
Existing Securities
Item Number: 5
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Alex Jauregui, City Planner
Subject:
Wellness Center Quarterly Report
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file the attached Wellness Center Quarterly Report.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Strategic Plan Goal D, Reducing Homelessness. The City completed construction of the Wellness Center Campus and began serving clients on December 12, 2023. The Planning Department's Homelessness Solutions staff monitors the Wellness Centers operations, ensuring successful outcomes in all areas including shelter operations, recuperative care, supportive services, medical care, outreach coordination, and wraparound supportive services.
Background:
On February 6, 2024, the Honorable City Council requested to have quarterly reports regarding the progress of the Wellness Center.
Discussion:
As part of the City’s ongoing efforts to achieve the strategies outlined in the adopted Strategic Plan for Reducing Homelessness, this Quarterly Report (Attachment A) summarizes the operational progress made at the Wellness Center for the period of October through December of 2025. Staff will continue providing this reporting on a quarterly basis to present key Wellness Center activities, highlights, and operational performance indicators. Staff remains available for any questions you may have. 4 5
5 0
Prepared By:
William Lamas, Homelessness Solutions Manager
Attachments: A. Wellness Center Quarterly Report
Attachment A
Wellness Center
Quarterly Report
QUARTERLY REPORT
OCTOBER-DECEMBER
Homelessness Solutions
Economic Development
THE SEASON OF GIVING
PAGE 2
OVERVIEW
As Victorville entered the winter months,
the City’s Homelessness Solutions Team
continued to gain remarkable
momentum, anchored by innovation,
compassion, and collaboration. The
Victorville Wellness Center remained a
centerpiece of progress, as a
countywide model for how housing and
healthcare integration can transform lives
on a daily basis. Through partnerships
with community partners, Victorville
continues to be a leader in innovative
ways to address homelessness. This
quarter marked significant progress in
housing expansion and service delivery.
The Wellness Center reached a major
milestone by housing its 200th individual
through its coordinated continuum of
care.
This period also marked the second full year of operations, reflecting the City’s continued commitment to enhancing homeless services and strengthening system-wide responses.
Throughout the quarter, ongoing improvements were made to case management and supportive services, ensuring more meaningful and effective client engagement. During the season of giving, clients received much-needed items, and community partners hosted numerous holiday meals in support of those served. Youth at the Wellness Center were also visited by Santa and were able to wake up to memorable gifts on Christmas Day.
In addition, this quarter provided an opportunity to evaluate and update services available to clients. Also, staff remained attentive to changes at both the state and federal levels that impact service delivery. The City closed out 2025 with the same strong momentum and dedication that defined the year prior.
As the season turns, the City stands committed in purpose, demonstrating that when housing, healthcare, and compassion come together, meaningful transformation takes root.
Recuperative (Respite) Care Update
The field of medical respite care (MRC) is rapidly
expanding, creating a growing need for clearly
defined program characteristics and quality
standards. As the leading national organization
dedicated to advancing high-quality medical respite
care, the National Institute for Medical Respite Care
(NIMRC) has developed a certification process
grounded in its nationally recognized Framework for
Medical Respite Care Programs.
In alignment with these standards, the City’s service
provider, Symba, earned national certification from
NIMRC for its medical respite and short-term post-
hospitalization programs at the Victorville Wellness
Center on November 13, 2025. This site-specific
certification reflects the City’s and Symba’s
commitment to high-quality, integrated healthcare
and housing services.
The Victorville Wellness Center’s operator receives the first of its kind certification for any recuperative care program within the Inland Empire.
Recuperative Care
Patients Served:
Medical Clinic
Patients Served:
The number of recuperative care patients has increased incrementally this past quarter. The City and Symba anticipate the number to increase during the 3rd quarter of FY 2026.
Note :
PAGE 3
December
8 October
5 November
4 November
215
October
208
December
186
ind ce
dical Clinic
December
8 October
5 November
4 October
208
December
186
November
215
Client Success
PAGE 4
Teresa Massie
T eresa Massie recently celebrated a life-changing milestone as the 200 graduate of the Victorville Wellness Center, making her successful transition from years of homelessness into her own apartment. th
Accompanied by her dog, Cindy Marie Lauper, T eresa has displayed incredible dedication to her recovery, working closely with Symba case managers to receive essential medical care and behavioral health treatment that addressed the root cause of her housing instability.
Driven by a humble and service-oriented heart, T eresa empowered those around her by establishing a dog-walking group designed to help build connections and provide shared encouragement. Her success is a shining example that with the right resources and resilient spirit, stability is possible.
PAGE 5
Employee Spotlight
FELIX DIAZ
PEER SUPPORT SPECIALIST
Felix Diaz was hired as Wellness
Center staff in February 2024 and has
made a significant impact on the team.
He consistently goes above and
beyond with a positive attitude that
uplifts everyone around him. Known for
his tireless work ethic and humble
spirit, Felix embodies the core values
of the Wellness Center.
Dedicated to providing critical support
to those navigating homelessness,
Felix carries this same spirit of service
into his church, where he shares his
musical talents playing the drums,
piano, accordion, and bass guitar. The
harmony he creates as a musician is a
natural extension of his work at the
Wellness Center.
Felix demonstrates that true
community work is about being present
and being ready to serve.
PAGE 6
MOTEL
VOUCHER
PROGRAM
A COMPASSIONATE AND STRATEGIC
APPROACH TO ADDRESSING
HOMELESSNESS IN REAL TIME.
Purpose
The City’s Motel Voucher Program, funded through
the Encampment Resolution Funding Program and
the Community Development Block Grant Program,
provides temporary, emergency lodging in local
motels for individuals or families experiencing
homelessness, serving as a bridge to stable housing.
Adapting Solutions to a City’s Unique Needs
As a High Desert city, Victorville faces intensified risks from extreme heat, wildfires, and sharp temperature drops in the Mojave Riverbed area. These events not only threaten the safety and health of unsheltered individuals but also places additional stress on shelter facilities already operating at capacity. The Motel Voucher Program is a flexible tool used to protect our most vulnerable residents.
Quarterly Impact
Snapshot
59 Adults Sheltered 16 Children Sheltered
37 Individuals linked to additional services and/or
transitioned into housing.
Data-Informed Coordination
of Homelessness Solutions
PAGE 7
Since the expansion of the Homelessness Solutions team, all homelessness- related calls and service requests have been centralized, allowing for a more streamlined and consistent approach to data collection and service coordination. This centralized intake model has improved linkage to appropriate outreach team members, community partners, and collateral agencies, including referrals and admissions to the Wellness Center.
Collected data via telephone, email, walk-ups, and Victorville Now is now being actively analyzed to identify geographic focus areas throughout the City and to develop heat maps that guide targeted outreach efforts. This data-driven approach ensures that high-concentration areas receive prioritized engagement and that clients are connected to appropriate levels of care. It also supports the identification of “high-utilizer” individuals who may require enhanced support or higher-level interventions.
Service Demand Snapshot:
Over 100 Homeless-Related Inquiries This Quarter
ENGAGEMENT AND IMPACT IN ACTION
PAGE 8
Leaders from the Southern
California Association of
Governments (SCAG)
visited the Wellness Center
as part of a tour of regional
projects in November. The
Wellness Center had
previously been honored
with the 2025 SCAG
Sustainability Award for
Housing Innovation, and the
visit allowed officials to see
the award-winning model in
action.
The Homelessness Solutions T eam attended the
Victor Valley College Trunk or Treat on October
25, 2025. This carnival-inspired Trunk or Treat
featured decorated fire trucks and hummers,
candy galore, engagement booths for the kids,
and special appearances by VVC’s own student-
athletes. During this family friendly celebration,
outreach materials and resources were handed
to the public, while the Homelessness Solutions
T eam gave out cotton candy to all the children!
For the 2025 Victorville Fall Festival held on
October 4, Homelessness Solutions Staff
attended and provided the community with
resources and information about the City’s
Strategic Action Plan to reduce homelessness,
the success of the Wellness Center, and the
City’s ability to meet people where they are by
connecting them to services that address key
life domains and support improved outcomes
and long-term housing stability.
DEMOGRAPHICS
Wellness Center
October - December 2025
46% 49% 5%
Mental Health Chronically Homeless Veterans
Men
57.1%
Women
42.9%
White
36%
African American
34%
Hispanic/Multi
30%
Client Gender
Race/Ethnicity
02 0 4 0 6 0 8 0
Under 18
18-24
25-44
45-54
55-61
Over 62
18 7
79 49
41 48
Client Age
PAGE 9
TOTAL NUMBER OF CLIENTS SERVED DURING QUARTER 2: 242
W
h
i
t
e
3 6
%
a
n
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
3 4
%
H
i
s
p
a
n
i
c
/
M
u
l
t
i
3 0
%
M
e
n
5 7
.
1 %
W
o
4 2
o
m
e
n
2 .
9 %
A
f
r
i
c
a
0 2
0 4
0 6
0 8
0 U
n
d
e
r
1 8
1 8
-
2 4
2 5
-
4 4
4 5
-
5 4
5 5
-
6 1
O
v
e
r
6 2
18 7
79 49
41 48
PAGE 9
October November December
0 2
4 6
8 10
2 10
5 October November December
0 10
20 30
40 50
29 43
22 AVERAGE
OCCUPANCY
A
V
E
R
A
G
E
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
INTAKES
HOUSING SOLUTIONS
PAGE 10
17 Clients Housed DURING QUARTER 2
94 Intakes Completed
163
INTAKES AND
HOUSING
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 2
2 9
9 4
3 2
2 O
c
t
o
b
e
r
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
0 2
4 6
8 1
0 2
1 0
5 As a strong City partner, the San
Bernardino County Office of
Homeless Services (OHS)
continues to help support clients
at the Victorville Wellness Center
by strengthening connections to
essential community resources
throughout San Bernardino
County. During this quarter, an
OHS kiosk was successfully
deployed to the Victorville
Wellness Center. This addition is
intended to expand on-site
access for Wellness Center
clients, allowing them to more
easily connect to County services,
complete referrals, and access
information without unnecessary
travel or delays.
Expanding Access
Through an OHS Kiosk
In addition to expanding client-facing technology, OHS also provided the Wellness Center with a new document scanner and a badge- making system to support day-to-day operations. These tools will help enhance administrative efficiency, improve client intake and documentation processes, and strengthen overall operational capacity at the Wellness Center.
PAGE 11
This holiday season was filled with warmth, joy, and genuine connection at the Wellness Center. Clients celebrated
together in a safe, welcoming environment that reflected care and dignity.
Holiday Cheer!
The City extends a heartfelt thank you
to our partners: 3M for donating care
packs; St. Mary’s Medical Center Local
Senior Club for handmade scarves and
beanies; First Assembly of God
Victorville and High Desert Second
Chance for coordinating holiday meals;
and dedicated City staff for bringing
the holiday spirit to life.
PAGE 12
IN THE NEXT QUARTER THE WELLNESS
CENTER TEAM PLANS TO WORK TOWARDS
THE FOLLOWING MILESTONES:
PAGE 13
RAPID REHOUSING
MEDICAL CLINIC
CLIENT
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM UPDATES
POINT-IN-TIME COUNT
VISITOR
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
THE WELLNESS JOURNEY
CONTINUES
Item Number: 6
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Payroll Demand Schedule No. 5A
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 5A for the payroll period of October 24, 2025, through November 7, 2025, in total amount of $2,397,664.42. This total includes:
Employee Check Nos. 34730 through 34733 in the amount of $4,541.87. Vendor Check Nos. 34734 through 34739 in the amount of $2,627.10. Advice Nos. 335799 through 336380 in the amount of $1,549,239.62; and Vendor Electronic Payments totaling $841,255.83.
All expenditures are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025–2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
Fiscal Impact:
A total fiscal impact of $2,397,664.42 is authorized with this action. The attached report details all payment types including employee checks, vendor checks, advice numbers, and electronic payments.
Discussion:
I hereby certify that the claims or demands covered by the attached list of warrants have been audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and that said claims or demands are accurate and the funds are available for payment thereof.
Prepared By:
Kimberly Major, Payroll Specialist
Attachments: A. Payroll Report PPE 110725
Attachment A
Payroll Report PPE 110725
Total Net
$952.70
$971.52
($594.72)
$594.72
$2,617.65
4,541.87
3458 11/14/2025
Check Number Employee ID Check Date
34730 4034 11/05/2025
Employee Checks
Checks Total
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 34732 3458 11/14/2025
34733 3853 11/14/2025
34731 3466 11/14/2025
34732
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 1 of 18 11/14/2025 Total Net
$5.00
$50.00
$50.00
$1,924.79
$422.31
$175.00
2,627.10
34734 240 11/14/2025
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 Check Number Vendor ID Check Date
Vendor Checks
34735 1182 11/14/2025
34736 1182 11/14/2025
34737 7912 11/14/2025
34738 13491 11/14/2025
34739 18154 11/14/2025
Checks Total
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 2 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
3778 10/31/2025 $77.96
3882 11/05/2025 $819.83
3940 11/07/2025 $972.57
3941 11/07/2025 $956.10
3844 11/07/2025 $2,659.61
3844 11/07/2025 $99.01
3396 11/14/2025 $2,530.27
1099 11/14/2025 $1,385.09
3243 11/14/2025 $5,895.93
2115 11/14/2025 $6,390.56
3640 11/14/2025 $1,956.52
3527 11/14/2025 $2,447.52
3945 11/14/2025 $645.83
3551 11/14/2025 $936.25
3229 11/14/2025 $5,165.75
3918 11/14/2025 $1,353.63
3290 11/14/2025 $2,844.31
4032 11/14/2025 $2,014.61
1064 11/14/2025 $8,114.77
3467 11/14/2025 $2,963.48
3909 11/14/2025 $1,899.38
2395 11/14/2025 $4,533.62
3764 11/14/2025 $2,765.38
2211 11/14/2025 $5,976.73
3747 11/14/2025 $2,207.47
3625 11/14/2025 $1,723.96
2624 11/14/2025 $2,820.27
3043 11/14/2025 $2,055.52
3964 11/14/2025 $1,256.84
3403 11/14/2025 $2,156.63
1748 11/14/2025 $2,609.20
3963 11/14/2025 $1,506.50
3848 11/14/2025 $1,999.92
3957 11/14/2025 $3,526.45
3913 11/14/2025 $2,298.44
3019 11/14/2025 $4,998.78
3638 11/14/2025 $4,935.17
3561 11/14/2025 $3,075.07
3920 11/14/2025 $2,414.13
3630 11/14/2025 $2,168.64
Advices
335803
335804
335805
335806
335807
Check Number
335799
335800
335801
335802
335813
335814
335815
335816
335817
335808
335809
335810
335811
335812
335823
335824
335825
335826
335827
335818
335819
335820
335821
335822
335833
335834
335835
335836
335837
335828
335829
335830
335831
335832
335838
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 3 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 2366 11/14/2025 $1,974.40
3750 11/14/2025 $2,105.35
3521 11/14/2025 $2,860.13
2093 11/14/2025 $1,848.55
2019 11/14/2025 $2,656.49
3753 11/14/2025 $4,537.16
3915 11/14/2025 $4,613.56
3917 11/14/2025 $2,433.55
3744 11/14/2025 $4,005.07
2606 11/14/2025 $2,472.41
3660 11/14/2025 $1,930.83
3914 11/14/2025 $2,444.31
1635 11/14/2025 $4,325.27
3327 11/14/2025 $2,563.51
3752 11/14/2025 $2,361.50
3912 11/14/2025 $1,216.74
3727 11/14/2025 $1,050.56
4035 11/14/2025 $2,463.09
3911 11/14/2025 $2,232.98
2618 11/14/2025 $2,610.74
4039 11/14/2025 $2,679.68
3845 11/14/2025 $3,588.36
2619 11/14/2025 $2,530.53
2491 11/14/2025 $2,443.33
3916 11/14/2025 $2,705.24
3961 11/14/2025 $1,889.56
3889 11/14/2025 $1,953.53
3045 11/14/2025 $2,671.73
3755 11/14/2025 $2,211.59
3608 11/14/2025 $4,959.40
3758 11/14/2025 $4,218.78
3817 11/14/2025 $2,560.67
3953 11/14/2025 $1,743.84
3362 11/14/2025 $2,937.30
2297 11/14/2025 $2,654.68
2232 11/14/2025 $3,718.11
1957 11/14/2025 $3,100.85
3809 11/14/2025 $2,244.85
3085 11/14/2025 $2,774.33
3714 11/14/2025 $2,691.04
335843
335844
335845
335846
335847
335839
335840
335841
335842
335853
335854
335855
335856
335857
335848
335849
335850
335851
335852
335863
335864
335865
335866
335867
335858
335859
335860
335861
335862
335873
335874
335875
335876
335877
335868
335869
335870
335871
335872
335878
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 4 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3742 11/14/2025 $2,275.09
4027 11/14/2025 $3,416.78
3863 11/14/2025 $2,214.76
3879 11/14/2025 $2,293.99
3846 11/14/2025 $4,113.26
3502 11/14/2025 $2,781.71
3987 11/14/2025 $3,013.31
3697 11/14/2025 $5,955.71
3868 11/14/2025 $4,793.20
2102 11/14/2025 $3,515.94
2233 11/14/2025 $2,728.89
3997 11/14/2025 $2,709.56
3865 11/14/2025 $2,058.56
2032 11/14/2025 $3,967.36
3499 11/14/2025 $3,167.72
3703 11/14/2025 $2,347.19
2323 11/14/2025 $3,895.65
3508 11/14/2025 $2,793.55
3740 11/14/2025 $1,724.29
2225 11/14/2025 $4,599.91
3221 11/14/2025 $2,809.94
3757 11/14/2025 $3,753.92
3998 11/14/2025 $3,080.76
3700 11/14/2025 $2,534.31
3966 11/14/2025 $2,327.98
2254 11/14/2025 $3,399.09
3618 11/14/2025 $2,513.12
3354 11/14/2025 $4,418.81
3400 11/14/2025 $3,013.99
3933 11/14/2025 $1,193.71
3544 11/14/2025 $2,342.81
2742 11/14/2025 $2,992.01
3934 11/14/2025 $4,672.57
3746 11/14/2025 $3,308.21
3089 11/14/2025 $3,497.70
3641 11/14/2025 $2,289.43
3854 11/14/2025 $2,926.03
3634 11/14/2025 $3,231.87
3805 11/14/2025 $3,017.61
2249 11/14/2025 $4,962.09
335883
335884
335885
335886
335887
335879
335880
335881
335882
335893
335894
335895
335896
335897
335888
335889
335890
335891
335892
335903
335904
335905
335906
335907
335898
335899
335900
335901
335902
335913
335914
335915
335916
335917
335908
335909
335910
335911
335912
335918
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 5 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3650 11/14/2025 $2,012.86
3938 11/14/2025 $2,111.57
3576 11/14/2025 $1,819.53
3876 11/14/2025 $2,735.77
3663 11/14/2025 $2,234.72
3541 11/14/2025 $2,843.39
2499 11/14/2025 $3,554.78
3379 11/14/2025 $2,937.11
3694 11/14/2025 $2,849.83
4004 11/14/2025 $1,201.46
3737 11/14/2025 $2,787.79
2105 11/14/2025 $5,216.33
3474 11/14/2025 $2,937.99
4038 11/14/2025 $2,281.62
2515 11/14/2025 $3,251.51
3636 11/14/2025 $3,070.13
2679 11/14/2025 $3,733.45
3490 11/14/2025 $3,219.96
3475 11/14/2025 $2,299.53
2181 11/14/2025 $3,194.65
3735 11/14/2025 $4,475.68
3880 11/14/2025 $1,186.47
3542 11/14/2025 $2,995.41
3731 11/14/2025 $2,698.08
1955 11/14/2025 $3,208.27
3943 11/14/2025 $2,451.52
3719 11/14/2025 $2,159.81
1632 11/14/2025 $2,584.61
3736 11/14/2025 $3,086.16
3692 11/14/2025 $2,875.81
3147 11/14/2025 $2,945.45
3881 11/14/2025 $1,258.48
3732 11/14/2025 $2,732.48
3944 11/14/2025 $1,237.42
3148 11/14/2025 $2,887.00
3808 11/14/2025 $3,685.58
3195 11/14/2025 $2,369.02
3884 11/14/2025 $1,265.50
4005 11/14/2025 $1,364.73
3353 11/14/2025 $2,741.01
335923
335924
335925
335926
335927
335919
335920
335921
335922
335933
335934
335935
335936
335937
335928
335929
335930
335931
335932
335943
335944
335945
335946
335947
335938
335939
335940
335941
335942
335953
335954
335955
335956
335957
335948
335949
335950
335951
335952
335958
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 6 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3626 11/14/2025 $2,838.43
3602 11/14/2025 $3,046.98
3112 11/14/2025 $2,080.79
3185 11/14/2025 $2,722.61
2605 11/14/2025 $2,705.06
3505 11/14/2025 $4,292.10
2377 11/14/2025 $3,200.95
4002 11/14/2025 $2,483.99
2259 11/14/2025 $4,846.03
3637 11/14/2025 $3,290.82
3628 11/14/2025 $2,523.60
3068 11/14/2025 $2,092.30
3702 11/14/2025 $2,652.64
3633 11/14/2025 $2,997.89
3129 11/14/2025 $4,408.85
3816 11/14/2025 $3,056.65
1998 11/14/2025 $3,052.22
3543 11/14/2025 $2,248.07
3303 11/14/2025 $4,245.91
3802 11/14/2025 $2,922.05
3558 11/14/2025 $3,015.25
1655 11/14/2025 $5,485.11
4008 11/14/2025 $3,156.18
1776 11/14/2025 $3,254.26
2600 11/14/2025 $3,083.12
2655 11/14/2025 $1,744.57
3393 11/14/2025 $2,450.84
3749 11/14/2025 $2,510.81
2522 11/14/2025 $3,244.12
2339 11/14/2025 $2,442.52
3878 11/14/2025 $3,607.48
1503 11/14/2025 $3,039.76
2505 11/14/2025 $2,779.46
1970 11/14/2025 $2,366.03
3113 11/14/2025 $2,965.31
1520 11/14/2025 $2,641.66
3273 11/14/2025 $2,404.70
1497 11/14/2025 $3,524.55
3537 11/14/2025 $3,960.83
2192 11/14/2025 $1,933.55
335963
335964
335965
335966
335967
335959
335960
335961
335962
335973
335974
335975
335976
335977
335968
335969
335970
335971
335972
335983
335984
335985
335986
335987
335978
335979
335980
335981
335982
335993
335994
335995
335996
335997
335988
335989
335990
335991
335992
335998
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 7 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 2540 11/14/2025 $4,099.11
3513 11/14/2025 $2,762.98
3685 11/14/2025 $2,045.66
2034 11/14/2025 $2,717.22
3380 11/14/2025 $2,377.51
3792 11/14/2025 $1,953.35
3871 11/14/2025 $2,437.65
3852 11/14/2025 $2,179.89
3051 11/14/2025 $2,534.92
1750 11/14/2025 $2,636.96
2770 11/14/2025 $2,013.96
2228 11/14/2025 $2,824.50
3827 11/14/2025 $3,850.30
3726 11/14/2025 $2,108.49
3748 11/14/2025 $2,621.85
3101 11/14/2025 $2,696.44
3335 11/14/2025 $2,449.15
3284 11/14/2025 $2,994.32
3840 11/14/2025 $2,588.23
2312 11/14/2025 $2,362.26
3510 11/14/2025 $3,975.72
2248 11/14/2025 $2,095.76
3622 11/14/2025 $2,014.10
3788 11/14/2025 $2,493.43
2189 11/14/2025 $3,096.87
3560 11/14/2025 $2,003.53
3509 11/14/2025 $2,994.48
1121 11/14/2025 $2,608.31
3968 11/14/2025 $2,346.77
3149 11/14/2025 $3,451.24
1865 11/14/2025 $2,310.61
3479 11/14/2025 $2,261.37
1723 11/14/2025 $2,752.68
3296 11/14/2025 $2,308.28
3707 11/14/2025 $2,574.87
3572 11/14/2025 $2,022.77
2531 11/14/2025 $3,460.21
1513 11/14/2025 $2,144.81
3283 11/14/2025 $3,567.89
2118 11/14/2025 $1,302.08
336003
336004
336005
336006
336007
335999
336000
336001
336002
336013
336014
336015
336016
336017
336008
336009
336010
336011
336012
336023
336024
336025
336026
336027
336018
336019
336020
336021
336022
336033
336034
336035
336036
336037
336028
336029
336030
336031
336032
336038
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 8 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3387 11/14/2025 $2,368.51
3330 11/14/2025 $2,323.82
2681 11/14/2025 $4,241.85
3988 11/14/2025 $3,905.26
1612 11/14/2025 $2,190.72
3610 11/14/2025 $1,976.31
3277 11/14/2025 $2,661.67
3287 11/14/2025 $2,241.08
3037 11/14/2025 $2,602.51
1449 11/14/2025 $3,255.76
2111 11/14/2025 $2,530.10
2677 11/14/2025 $5,998.61
3984 11/14/2025 $3,234.44
3688 11/14/2025 $2,017.27
3341 11/14/2025 $2,477.60
3970 11/14/2025 $1,237.42
2383 11/14/2025 $2,405.76
3687 11/14/2025 $2,211.63
3130 11/14/2025 $2,330.68
2489 11/14/2025 $2,030.93
3733 11/14/2025 $2,070.43
3361 11/14/2025 $2,765.37
3285 11/14/2025 $2,997.34
1529 11/14/2025 $612.33
3624 11/14/2025 $3,366.17
3139 11/14/2025 $2,095.43
3099 11/14/2025 $2,601.45
3994 11/14/2025 $2,045.59
3346 11/14/2025 $2,257.42
3969 11/14/2025 $1,500.85
3536 11/14/2025 $3,065.47
3722 11/14/2025 $2,127.80
1254 11/14/2025 $2,123.14
3187 11/14/2025 $2,369.95
3804 11/14/2025 $2,737.77
2368 11/14/2025 $7,756.58
3192 11/14/2025 $2,200.18
3100 11/14/2025 $3,383.94
3796 11/14/2025 $1,859.14
1338 11/14/2025 $4,044.73
336043
336044
336045
336046
336047
336039
336040
336041
336042
336053
336054
336055
336056
336057
336048
336049
336050
336051
336052
336063
336064
336065
336066
336067
336058
336059
336060
336061
336062
336073
336074
336075
336076
336077
336068
336069
336070
336071
336072
336078
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 9 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 2229 11/14/2025 $2,217.34
4001 11/14/2025 $3,748.48
1049 11/14/2025 $2,489.84
3586 11/14/2025 $2,285.00
1506 11/14/2025 $2,063.75
3004 11/14/2025 $2,427.71
2833 11/14/2025 $2,535.09
3794 11/14/2025 $1,822.98
2798 11/14/2025 $2,420.62
3265 11/14/2025 $2,049.46
1932 11/14/2025 $2,195.90
3279 11/14/2025 $2,283.28
2460 11/14/2025 $1,897.07
3874 11/14/2025 $2,313.38
3671 11/14/2025 $1,748.48
2732 11/14/2025 $4,187.90
3823 11/14/2025 $2,232.55
3338 11/14/2025 $1,800.20
2552 11/14/2025 $2,037.38
2476 11/14/2025 $3,835.93
2279 11/14/2025 $3,091.14
3515 11/14/2025 $6,233.89
3092 11/14/2025 $3,758.96
3836 11/14/2025 $2,271.89
3138 11/14/2025 $3,404.82
3512 11/14/2025 $2,524.35
3146 11/14/2025 $3,239.68
2590 11/14/2025 $2,700.93
2748 11/14/2025 $2,651.80
3709 11/14/2025 $4,046.51
2669 11/14/2025 $3,682.45
2623 11/14/2025 $2,140.36
2637 11/14/2025 $2,420.70
3972 11/14/2025 $5,168.99
2638 11/14/2025 $3,049.96
3803 11/14/2025 $2,320.01
3109 11/14/2025 $3,013.81
2671 11/14/2025 $3,307.30
2593 11/14/2025 $2,856.38
3328 11/14/2025 $3,270.18
336083
336084
336085
336086
336087
336079
336080
336081
336082
336093
336094
336095
336096
336097
336088
336089
336090
336091
336092
336103
336104
336105
336106
336107
336098
336099
336100
336101
336102
336113
336114
336115
336116
336117
336108
336109
336110
336111
336112
336118
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 10 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3461 11/14/2025 $2,065.37
2626 11/14/2025 $2,675.71
3621 11/14/2025 $1,900.52
3937 11/14/2025 $2,603.62
3038 11/14/2025 $3,981.94
3052 11/14/2025 $2,125.75
2290 11/14/2025 $2,097.58
3716 11/14/2025 $2,083.87
3110 11/14/2025 $4,162.14
2641 11/14/2025 $1,231.06
2612 11/14/2025 $2,656.55
2642 11/14/2025 $2,267.73
3705 11/14/2025 $2,292.19
3331 11/14/2025 $2,097.04
2674 11/14/2025 $3,290.01
3231 11/14/2025 $2,517.40
3228 11/14/2025 $2,839.33
2628 11/14/2025 $2,745.62
2630 11/14/2025 $2,769.54
3182 11/14/2025 $3,562.25
2599 11/14/2025 $2,976.96
2683 11/14/2025 $2,945.34
2753 11/14/2025 $4,030.68
2610 11/14/2025 $2,599.00
3323 11/14/2025 $1,921.50
1389 11/14/2025 $3,381.29
2808 11/14/2025 $2,315.65
2646 11/14/2025 $2,542.23
3617 11/14/2025 $2,290.28
2524 11/14/2025 $3,630.25
2686 11/14/2025 $2,318.75
3942 11/14/2025 $2,269.10
3951 11/14/2025 $1,693.32
2193 11/14/2025 $2,619.02
3322 11/14/2025 $629.86
3629 11/14/2025 $3,134.38
3230 11/14/2025 $4,010.96
2038 11/14/2025 $1,807.42
3985 11/14/2025 $2,098.43
2678 11/14/2025 $4,290.55
336123
336124
336125
336126
336127
336119
336120
336121
336122
336133
336134
336135
336136
336137
336128
336129
336130
336131
336132
336143
336144
336145
336146
336147
336138
336139
336140
336141
336142
336153
336154
336155
336156
336157
336148
336149
336150
336151
336152
336158
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 11 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3240 11/14/2025 $2,961.97
3743 11/14/2025 $2,301.31
4040 11/14/2025 $1,781.20
3215 11/14/2025 $2,922.11
3140 11/14/2025 $2,392.10
3035 11/14/2025 $2,835.26
4020 11/14/2025 $1,251.46
3651 11/14/2025 $2,479.01
3299 11/14/2025 $2,170.49
4015 11/14/2025 $1,251.46
4036 11/14/2025 $1,324.95
3765 11/14/2025 $562.11
1853 11/14/2025 $3,048.01
3729 11/14/2025 $1,831.40
2343 11/14/2025 $1,636.37
3959 11/14/2025 $1,355.56
3821 11/14/2025 $1,251.46
3497 11/14/2025 $1,872.91
1426 11/14/2025 $1,183.06
3105 11/14/2025 $1,922.85
3579 11/14/2025 $904.79
4010 11/14/2025 $1,339.46
3386 11/14/2025 $2,782.37
3191 11/14/2025 $2,380.36
3931 11/14/2025 $2,137.17
3922 11/14/2025 $2,286.39
2488 11/14/2025 $1,033.49
3496 11/14/2025 $1,327.04
4021 11/14/2025 $863.81
3482 11/14/2025 $2,053.65
3611 11/14/2025 $1,730.54
3724 11/14/2025 $1,237.42
3011 11/14/2025 $1,770.17
3623 11/14/2025 $1,205.42
3768 11/14/2025 $328.23
4016 11/14/2025 $1,324.95
3580 11/14/2025 $1,884.56
3905 11/14/2025 $320.03
3939 11/14/2025 $1,005.34
3873 11/14/2025 $2,267.55
336163
336164
336165
336166
336167
336159
336160
336161
336162
336173
336174
336175
336176
336177
336168
336169
336170
336171
336172
336183
336184
336185
336186
336187
336178
336179
336180
336181
336182
336193
336194
336195
336196
336197
336188
336189
336190
336191
336192
336198
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 12 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3270 11/14/2025 $2,171.06
4000 11/14/2025 $2,242.33
3263 11/14/2025 $2,084.70
3795 11/14/2025 $2,152.20
3252 11/14/2025 $2,848.81
3295 11/14/2025 $2,520.29
3257 11/14/2025 $3,251.86
3184 11/14/2025 $4,313.91
3070 11/14/2025 $2,270.51
3657 11/14/2025 $877.24
3689 11/14/2025 $1,934.41
4012 11/14/2025 $1,364.97
3288 11/14/2025 $1,958.33
3767 11/14/2025 $262.59
1866 11/14/2025 $3,076.85
3774 11/14/2025 $139.50
3791 11/14/2025 $1,251.46
3950 11/14/2025 $3,463.90
3936 11/14/2025 $977.24
3772 11/14/2025 $393.88
3340 11/14/2025 $1,230.19
3766 11/14/2025 $1,052.86
3822 11/14/2025 $1,251.46
1282 11/14/2025 $2,864.24
3481 11/14/2025 $2,168.80
2379 11/14/2025 $2,238.83
4028 11/14/2025 $1,118.04
3813 11/14/2025 $855.43
3672 11/14/2025 $1,125.08
3656 11/14/2025 $966.80
3789 11/14/2025 $4,589.80
4018 11/14/2025 $1,177.34
3793 11/14/2025 $2,069.70
3775 11/14/2025 $82.06
2478 11/14/2025 $1,012.14
3919 11/14/2025 $877.24
1287 11/14/2025 $2,888.74
3973 11/14/2025 $2,152.82
3667 11/14/2025 $295.43
4014 11/14/2025 $1,251.46
336203
336204
336205
336206
336207
336199
336200
336201
336202
336213
336214
336215
336216
336217
336208
336209
336210
336211
336212
336223
336224
336225
336226
336227
336218
336219
336220
336221
336222
336233
336234
336235
336236
336237
336228
336229
336230
336231
336232
336238
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 13 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 2711 11/14/2025 $1,744.48
3798 11/14/2025 $1,111.02
3258 11/14/2025 $2,022.17
4017 11/14/2025 $1,251.46
3259 11/14/2025 $1,736.35
4031 11/14/2025 $1,324.96
3507 11/14/2025 $2,566.47
3790 11/14/2025 $1,304.46
3531 11/14/2025 $3,733.06
3655 11/14/2025 $1,589.44
3897 11/14/2025 $324.13
3814 11/14/2025 $888.57
3639 11/14/2025 $1,568.53
3587 11/14/2025 $873.05
3029 11/14/2025 $2,488.43
3190 11/14/2025 $3,466.85
1959 11/14/2025 $3,519.17
3250 11/14/2025 $1,941.64
3824 11/14/2025 $1,251.46
4007 11/14/2025 $2,600.71
3812 11/14/2025 $872.20
3609 11/14/2025 $1,679.34
3492 11/14/2025 $597.99
3866 11/14/2025 $690.92
3910 11/14/2025 $909.35
3725 11/14/2025 $878.35
3647 11/14/2025 $73.85
3566 11/14/2025 $695.96
3777 11/14/2025 $147.71
3511 11/14/2025 $2,345.29
4033 11/14/2025 $2,156.67
4011 11/14/2025 $1,324.96
3867 11/14/2025 $2,067.08
3368 11/14/2025 $2,189.76
1767 11/14/2025 $2,916.36
3627 11/14/2025 $3,439.35
2006 11/14/2025 $3,620.90
1533 11/14/2025 $2,440.08
3761 11/14/2025 $3,303.38
2684 11/14/2025 $1,435.10
336243
336244
336245
336246
336247
336239
336240
336241
336242
336253
336254
336255
336256
336257
336248
336249
336250
336251
336252
336263
336264
336265
336266
336267
336258
336259
336260
336261
336262
336273
336274
336275
336276
336277
336268
336269
336270
336271
336272
336278
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 14 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3923 11/14/2025 $1,685.72
3967 11/14/2025 $1,771.88
3079 11/14/2025 $1,663.64
1966 11/14/2025 $5,426.06
3388 11/14/2025 $2,569.50
2355 11/14/2025 $2,692.50
3696 11/14/2025 $3,064.68
3500 11/14/2025 $4,026.44
3620 11/14/2025 $2,123.99
3654 11/14/2025 $266.43
2039 11/14/2025 $2,036.57
3838 11/14/2025 $2,556.61
3281 11/14/2025 $2,332.21
3550 11/14/2025 $3,021.56
3348 11/14/2025 $2,584.24
3862 11/14/2025 $1,546.70
3081 11/14/2025 $2,134.45
3523 11/14/2025 $5,282.18
3271 11/14/2025 $1,883.18
2027 11/14/2025 $1,363.16
2330 11/14/2025 $3,539.02
2795 11/14/2025 $1,112.99
3888 11/14/2025 $2,196.40
3989 11/14/2025 $2,080.77
3437 11/14/2025 $4,175.02
3421 11/14/2025 $3,616.41
3439 11/14/2025 $2,064.96
3440 11/14/2025 $4,321.31
3441 11/14/2025 $3,392.03
3473 11/14/2025 $4,978.30
3820 11/14/2025 $4,523.50
3406 11/14/2025 $2,679.23
3992 11/14/2025 $2,912.87
3422 11/14/2025 $4,422.67
3442 11/14/2025 $3,570.41
3433 11/14/2025 $2,702.67
3424 11/14/2025 $2,709.52
3414 11/14/2025 $3,395.22
3704 11/14/2025 $4,200.80
3734 11/14/2025 $5,649.76
336283
336284
336285
336286
336287
336279
336280
336281
336282
336293
336294
336295
336296
336297
336288
336289
336290
336291
336292
336303
336304
336305
336306
336307
336298
336299
336300
336301
336302
336313
336314
336315
336316
336317
336308
336309
336310
336311
336312
336318
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 15 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 3832 11/14/2025 $4,085.16
3799 11/14/2025 $3,240.54
3886 11/14/2025 $3,693.06
3443 11/14/2025 $4,229.16
3600 11/14/2025 $2,383.62
3711 11/14/2025 $4,394.93
3928 11/14/2025 $6,243.07
3715 11/14/2025 $4,096.18
3444 11/14/2025 $2,806.80
3583 11/14/2025 $1,912.34
3952 11/14/2025 $1,895.55
3594 11/14/2025 $2,860.92
3409 11/14/2025 $5,006.22
3856 11/14/2025 $5,099.88
3426 11/14/2025 $7,448.79
3860 11/14/2025 $1,955.31
3642 11/14/2025 $4,723.37
3996 11/14/2025 $2,648.80
3584 11/14/2025 $4,418.85
3538 11/14/2025 $2,261.25
3410 11/14/2025 $3,199.85
3828 11/14/2025 $2,345.96
3447 11/14/2025 $3,160.14
3427 11/14/2025 $3,220.67
3411 11/14/2025 $5,193.82
3448 11/14/2025 $2,552.56
3833 11/14/2025 $2,880.29
3518 11/14/2025 $1,487.16
3449 11/14/2025 $2,063.42
3428 11/14/2025 $2,791.41
3858 11/14/2025 $1,870.27
3429 11/14/2025 $4,357.52
3451 11/14/2025 $5,111.65
3595 11/14/2025 $5,773.40
3430 11/14/2025 $3,063.00
3452 11/14/2025 $4,353.00
3417 11/14/2025 $3,339.63
3431 11/14/2025 $4,008.83
3242 11/14/2025 $3,220.90
3857 11/14/2025 $2,553.66
336323
336324
336325
336326
336327
336319
336320
336321
336322
336333
336334
336335
336336
336337
336328
336329
336330
336331
336332
336343
336344
336345
336346
336347
336338
336339
336340
336341
336342
336353
336354
336355
336356
336357
336348
336349
336350
336351
336352
336358
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 16 of 18 11/14/2025 Employee ID Check Date Total Net
Advices
Check Number
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 4006 11/14/2025 $2,717.99
3419 11/14/2025 $4,494.31
3991 11/14/2025 $2,808.53
4037 11/14/2025 $2,301.51
3524 11/14/2025 $2,559.89
3412 11/14/2025 $5,058.08
3829 11/14/2025 $4,281.15
3420 11/14/2025 $3,469.98
3921 11/14/2025 $5,024.92
3435 11/14/2025 $6,621.06
3800 11/14/2025 $3,712.52
3432 11/14/2025 $1,828.56
3408 11/14/2025 $3,089.37
3456 11/14/2025 $2,436.90
3859 11/14/2025 $2,654.72
3947 11/14/2025 $3,303.15
3763 11/14/2025 $3,709.63
3591 11/14/2025 $4,563.40
3855 11/14/2025 $5,301.77
3831 11/14/2025 $2,355.87
3434 11/14/2025 $2,984.71
3971 11/14/2025 $1,207.41
Advices Total 1,549,239.62
336360
336361
336362
336378
336379
336380
336373
336374
336375
336376
336377
336368
336369
336370
336371
336372
336363
336364
336365
336366
336367
336359
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 17 of 18 11/14/2025 Check Date Total Gross
IRS 10/31/2025 $6.14
IRS 11/05/2025 $134.23
IRS 11/07/2025 $714.09
IRS 11/14/2025 $266,934.69
State Taxes 11/05/2025 $9.97
State Taxes 11/06/2025 $13.36
State Taxes 11/10/2025 $173.51
State Taxes 11/14/2025 $75,885.02
CASDU 11/14/2025 $7,563.37
Deferred Comp (457) 11/03/2025 $15.89
Deferred Comp (457) 11/06/2025 $154.08
Deferred Comp (457) 11/10/2025 $168.78
Deferred Comp (457) 11/17/2025 $89,257.54
Deferred Comp (401a) 11/04/2025 $325.15
PERS 11/17/2025 $437.76
PERS 12/03/2025 $391,229.25
Confidential Garnishment 11/13/2025 $423.00
VV Firefighter's Union 11/13/2025 $7,810.00
Electronic Vendor Payments Total 841,255.83
Vendor
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period: October 24, 2025 through November 7, 2025 Electronic Vendor Payments
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 18 of 18 11/14/2025 Item Number: 7
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Security Substitution for Tract Map No. 17701
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve the execution of a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Crossings at Victorville L.P.;
(2) Approve the execution of a Lien Agreement as improvement security with Crossings at Victorville L.P.;
(3) Release the existing Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Crossings at Victorville L.P.;
(4) Approve the execution of a Release of the existing Utility Surety Agreement with Crossings at Victorville, L.P.; and
(5) Approve the execution of a Partial Release of the existing Land Division Improvement Construction Agreement with Shirley and Charles Westover.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E, invest in Infrastructure, in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community's needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 17701 (hereinafter referred to as “Tract 17701”) is located at the southwest corner of Seneca Road and Cahuenga Road. In January 2009, the City entered into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Crossings at Victorville, L.P., whose general partner is Investment Concepts, Inc. The developer was conditioned to complete water, 4 4
8 7
storm drain, sewer, and street public improvements; however, no improvements have been completed to date. The developer has indicated full intention to complete the required improvements later when development begins.
Discussion:
The developer and owner, Crossings at Victorville, L.P., wishes to enter into a new Subdivision Improvement Agreement with a Lien Agreement as substitute security in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.060.
Therefore, staff recommends City Council approval of the execution of a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Crossings of Victorville L.P., acceptance of the Lien Agreement as substitute security, the release of the existing Subdivision Agreement with Crossings at Victorville L.P., the release of the existing Utility Surety Agreement with Crossings at Victorville L.P., and a partial release of the existing Land Division Improvement Construction Agreement with Shirley and Charles Westover.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Prepared By:
Nicoale Sylvestre, Management Specialist
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Existing Subdivision Agreement
C. Release of Subdivision Improvement Agreement
D. Existing Utility Surety Agreement
E. Release of Utility Surety Agreement
F. Existing Land Division Improvement Construction Agreement G. Partial Release of Land Division Improvement Construction Agreement
H. Subdivision Improvement Agreement
I. Lien Agreement
Attachment A
Vicinity Map
Attachment B
Existing Subdivision
Agreement
Attachment C
Release of Subdivision
Improvement Agreement
Attachment D
Existing Utility
Surety Agreement
Attachment E
Release of Utility
Surety Agreement
Recording Requested by:
The City of Victorville
When Recorded Please Return To:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
APN-0396-401-01-0000
RELEASE OF UTILITY SURETY AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Victorville, (hereinafter called “CITY”, entered into a Utility Surety Agreement with Crossings at Victorville, L.P., a California limited partnership, hereinafter called “DEVELOPER”, pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the development of the land associated with Tract Map No. 17701, which map subdivided the land described in the attached Exhibit “A”, hereinafter called “PROPERTY”; and
WHEREAS, said Utility Surety Agreement imposed duties, obligations, and requirements on DEVELOPER; and
WHEREAS , said Utility Surety Agreement was recorded on November 4th, 2011, as Document No. 2011-0459961 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has entered into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and a Lien Agreement with the CITY with respect to development of the PROPERTY; and
WHEREAS , the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Lien Agreement between the CITY and DEVELOPER, were recorded on ________________, 2026 as Document Nos. __________________ and ______________, respectively, in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recordation of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Lien Agreement between CITY and DEVELOPER, CITY hereby releases Crossings at Victorville, L.P. (DEVELOPER) and its heirs, assignees, or successors in interest from any further duty, obligation, or requirement imposed by the Utility Surety Agreement recorded as Document No. 2011-0459961, and the same is hereby deemed to be of no further force and effect and shall cease to exist as a lien, duty, obligation, or cloud on the title to the PROPERTY described as follows:
See Exhibit “A”
I hereby state that the Utility Surety Agreement herein identified is being released in accordance with Title 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code due to the recordation of a new Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Lien Agreement between the CITY and DEVELOPER.
_________________________
Fredy A. Bonilla, City Engineer
R.C.E No. 70349
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
By: ___________________
Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor
Date: __________________
ATTEST:
______________________
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
Andre de Bortnowsky, City Attorney
EXHIBIT “A”
Real property in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California described as follows:
LOT 1 OF TRACT MAP NO. 17701, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 335 PAGES 65 AND 66 OF
MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Attachment F
Existing Land Division
Improvement
Construction Agreement
Attachment G
Partial Release of Land
Division Improvement
Construction Agreement
Attachment H
Subdivision Improvement
Agreement
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
ENGINEERING DEPT.
14343 CIVIC DR.
VICTORVILLE, CA 92392
APN 0396-401-01-0000
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE
RECORDING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS FEE-EXEMPT
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 6103, 27383, AND 27388.1(2)(D)
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
Tract Map No. 17710
(Lien Agreement as Security)
THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Victorville, a California municipal corporation and charter City, hereinafter referred to as “City”, and ,Crossings at Victorville, L.P, hereinafter referred to as “Subdivider”. City and Subdivider are sometimes hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, this Agreement is executed pursuant to the provisions of the California Subdivision Map Act, Government Code section 66410 et seq. (the “Map Act”) and the ordinances and regulations of the City relating to the filing, approval, and recordation of subdivision maps, including without limitation, Title 17 and the applicable provisions of Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code (the “VMC”). The Map Act and the aforementioned ordinances and regulations of the City are collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Subdivision Laws” and Subdivider acknowledges familiarity with said Subdivision Laws and hereby agrees to comply therewith; and
WHEREAS, Subdivider is currently the record fee owner of that certain real property situated in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto (hereinafter called the “Subdivision”); and
WHEREAS, Subdivider has presented to the City for approval a final subdivision or parcel map, entitled Tract Map No. 17701, as more particularly depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto (hereinafter called the “Map”), recorded in Map Book 335, Pages 65, through 66, inclusive in the records of San Bernardino County, California; and
WHEREAS, Subdivider has requested approval of the Map prior to the construction and completion of the associated required public improvements which are a part of, or appurtenant to, the Subdivision designated in the Map, including installation of all streets, highways, public ways, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, storm drainage and other drainage facilities, public utility facilities, recreation facilities, median and parkway landscaping and irrigation, and other public improvements that are required by the Subdivision Laws and/or the conditions of approval imposed on the Map, as set forth on the tentative map previously approved by the City and in the City’s Planning Commission Resolution No(s). P-05-290, (collectively the “Conditions of Approval”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has found and determined that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the public improvements described in the preceding recital (collectively hereinafter the “Required Improvements”) sooner than two (2) years after the recordation of the Map.
NOW THEREFORE , for and in consideration of the approval of the Map and of the acceptance of the dedications therein offered, and in order to insure satisfactory performance by Subdivider of Subdivider’s obligations under the Subdivision Laws and this Agreement, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Performance of Work; Required Improvements
Subdivider will do and perform, or cause to be done and performed, at Subdivider’s own expense, in a good and workmanlike manner, and furnish all required materials, all under the direction and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, all of the work and Required Improvements for this Subdivision in accordance with the plans and specifications on file as herein specified, or with any changes required or ordered by said Engineer, which in his opinion are necessary or required to complete the work. All such construction, installation and other related work shall be performed at Subdivider's sole expense.
2. Work: Places and Grades to be Approved by Engineer
All of said work is to be done at the places, of the materials, in the manner, and at the grades, all as shown upon the plans and specifications heretofore approved by City Engineer (hereinafter the “Approved Plans”) and which are now on file in his office, and to the satisfaction of said City Engineer.
The actual work of surveying shall be performed by the Subdivider’s engineer.
3. Specifications
(a) The Required Improvements and work embraced herein shall be done in accordance with the provisions of the Greenbook Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, as adopted by the Greenbook Committee, current edition, insofar as they may apply (hereinafter the “Greenbook Specifications”), and the City of Victorville Standard Specifications for Public Improvements (hereinafter the “City Standard Specifications”). Whenever in the Greenbook Specifications the following terms are used, they shall be understood to mean the following:
(1) Agency: City of Victorville, California.
(2) Board: Victorville City Council
(3) Engineer: Whenever the term is not qualified, shall mean the City Engineer of the City of Victorville, California acting either directly or through his properly authorized agents, each agent acting only within the scope of the authority delegated to him.
(4) Laboratory: The laboratory to be approved by the City of Victorville to test materials and work involved in the construction provided for under this Agreement.
(b) In case of conflict between the Greenbook Specifications and the City Standard Specifications, the City Standard Specifications shall prevail.
(c) In case of conflict between the Greenbook Specifications, the City Standard Specifications, and the Approved Plans and this Agreement, the Approved Plans and this Agreement shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions of the Greenbook Specifications or City Standard Specifications.
4. Work; Time for Commencement and Completion of Required Improvements (a) The work of installing the Required Improvements shall commence within the time provided for in Section I.E of the Lien Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit C, but in no event later than the date that is six (6) years (ten (10) years in the event of an extension under VMC Section
17.64.065(h)) after the date this Agreement, the Map, and the Lien Agreement are recorded in the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office (hereinafter the “Commencement Date”).
Recordation shall take place only after the City Council has approved the Map, the Lien Agreement, and this Agreement.
(b) The City hereby fixes the time for the completion of said Required Improvements work to be not less than two (2) years after the Commencement Date (hereinafter the “Completion Date”), unless an extension is granted as set forth in Section 5, below.
5. Time of Essence - Extension
Time is of the essence in this Agreement; provided, that in the event good cause is shown therefor, the City Manager or the City Council may extend the Completion Date. Any such extension may be granted without notice to the Subdivider’s surety, and extensions so granted shall not relieve the surety’s liability on the bond to secure the faithful performance of this agreement. The City Manager or City Council shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle Subdivider to an extension. All references to the City Manager in this Agreement shall be deemed to include his/her duly authorized designees.
6. Repairs and Replacements
Subdivider shall replace or repair, or have replaced or repaired, as the case may be, all pipes and monuments shown on the Map which have been destroyed or damaged. Subdivider shall also replace or repair, or have replaced or repaired, all public improvements, public utility facilities, and surveying or subdivision monuments which are destroyed or damaged in the performance of any work under this Agreement. Subdivider shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repairs of any and all public or private utility property damaged or destroyed in the performance of any work done under this Agreement, whether such property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the City, or any public or private utility corporation, or by any combination of such owners. Any such repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer. In lieu of making the aforementioned replacements and repairs to any property damaged or destroyed by the work, Subdivider may pay to the owner(s) of said property, the entire cost of such replacement or repair.
7. Permits; Compliance with Law
Subdivider shall, at Subdivider’s expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of such Required Improvements, give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law.
Subdivider agrees to procure, at his expense, any necessary permits required for the opening of any state or county roads or easements outside the jurisdiction of City.
8. Superintendence by Subdivider
Subdivider shall give personal superintendence to the work on said Required Improvements, or have a competent foreman or superintendent, satisfactory to the City Engineer, on the work at all times during progress, with authority to act for Subdivider.
9. Inspection by City
Subdivider shall at all times maintain proper facilities, and provide safe access for inspection by City, to all parts of the work, and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation.
10. Contract Security
(a) The City Council has made a finding that it would not be in the public interest to require installation of the Required Improvements sooner than two (2) years after the recordation of Map. Pursuant to the Subdivision Laws, the City is authorized to accept a lien agreement to secure Subdivider’s performance under this Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions of Chapter 17.64 and in particular Section 17.64.065 of the VMC. Therefore, concurrently with the execution hereof, Subdivider has secured the performance of its obligations hereunder by entering into the Lien Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit C.
(b) In accordance with the provisions of said Lien Agreement, including but not limited to Sections I.D and I.E thereof, Subdivider shall, prior to obtaining any construction or other permits required hereunder, and prior to commencing any work on the Required Improvements, substitute other forms of security as specified in VMC Sections 17.64.060(a)(1)-(3) and satisfactory to the City in place of said Lien Agreement. The substitute securities shall be in the amounts and for the
purposes set forth below, except that the amounts shall be calculated using the estimated cost of the Required Improvements at the time of said substitution, as ascertained by the City Engineer:
(1) Performance security in an amount equal to at least one hundred percent (100%) of the approved Engineer’s estimate as security for the faithful performance of this Agreement.
(2) Labor and materials security in an amount equal to at least fifty percent (50%) of said estimate as security for the payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing materials in the construction of this tract, including any claims to which reference is made in Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the California Civil Code.
(3) Monument security in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the total estimated cost of the installation of survey monuments, as determined by the City Engineer, to guarantee and secure the placement of such monuments.
(c) The substitute securities specified above shall be in the form of cash deposits, an irrevocable letter of credit which meets the requirements of VMC Section 17.64.060(a)(3), or bonds provided by a corporate surety admitted by the California Department of Insurance to transact surety insurance business in California (with a Best’s Insurance Guide rating of no less than A-) and written on such forms as may be provided by State statute for such purposes and approved by the City, or in such other form as may be provided for by law and satisfactory to City. Security instruments shall be worded and dated to become effective immediately upon failure of the Subdivider to complete the Required Improvements specified in this Agreement by the Completion Date, including any extension(s) thereof which have been granted by the City Council or the City Manager as set forth in Section 5 hereof. In the event corporate surety bonds are used as substitute securities, at the time of substitution, the Parties will amend this Agreement to include the name and address of Surety for purposes of providing notice as set forth in Section 20 hereof.
11. Defense, Indemnification, and Hold-Harmless Agreement (a) To the fullest extent permitted by law, Subdivider agrees to and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and elective and appointive boards from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, including property damage, personal injury, including death, costs, including attorney fees, and liability of any kind or nature directly or indirectly arising out of or in any way connected with performance under this Agreement and/or the construction of the Required Improvements by the Subdivider, its contractors or subcontractors, or of any person directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for the Subdivider, its contractors or subcontractors, save and except those matters arising from the sole, active negligence of the City.
(b) This defense, indemnification, and hold harmless provision shall extend to claims, losses, damage, injury, costs, including attorney fees, and liability for injuries occurring after completion of the construction of the Required Improvements as well as during construction, and shall apply regardless of whether or not the City has prepared, supplied or approved the plans and/or specifications for the Required Improvements or has inspected or accepted the same.
(c) Acceptance of insurance required under this Agreement shall not relieve Subdivider from liability under this defense, indemnification, and hold harmless provision. Subdivider’s obligation to indemnify shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by City.
(d) The Parties intend that this Section 11 shall be broadly construed to effectuate its purpose.
12. Subdivider’s Insurance
(a) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance. Prior to the Commencement Date, Subdivider shall procure and maintain at its own expense, during the initial term of this Agreement (and during any extension periods), Comprehensive General Liability insurance (including contractual liability), of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, death, loss, or damage resulting from the wrongful or negligent acts by Subdivider or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents and independent contractors.
(b) Commercial Vehicle (Automobile) Liability Insurance. Prior to the Commencement Date, Subdivider shall further procure and maintain, at its own expense, during the initial term of this Agreement (and during any extension periods) Commercial Vehicle Liability insurance covering personal injury and property damage, of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit, covering any vehicle utilized by Subdivider or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors in performing the services required by this Agreement.
(c) Workers’ Compensation Insurance. Prior to the Commencement Date, Subdivider shall procure and maintain at its own expense, during the initial term of this Agreement (and during any extension periods), Workers’ Compensation insurance, providing coverage as required by the California State Workers’ Compensation Law. If any class of employees employed by the Subdivider pursuant to this Agreement is not protected by the California State Workers’ Compensation Law, Subdivider shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the City.
(d) Additional Named Insureds. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any required insurance policies or any subsequent endorsements attached thereto, all insurance policies, except for the Workers’ Compensation policy, shall be endorsed to name the City and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors, including, without limitation, the City Attorney, as Additional Insureds.
(e) Waiver of Subrogation Rights. Subdivider shall require the carriers of all required insurance policies to waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents, and independent contractors and subcontractors. Each policy of insurance shall be endorsed to reflect such waiver.
(f) Proof of Insurance Coverage; Required Endorsements. Subdivider shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies authorized to transact insurance business in the State of California, the policies of insurance required by this Agreement and furnish to the City Clerk certificates of insurance evidencing the required coverage, and following policy endorsements at least one (1) business day prior to the Commencement Date and prior to commencing work on the Required Improvements.
(1) The policies and certificates of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that in the event of cancellation or amendment of any required insurance policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than thirty (30) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. In the case of cancellation for non-payment, ten (10) days advance written notice shall be given.
(2) Each policy and certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that the policy shall not be terminated or expire without first providing thirty (30) days written notice to the City of such termination or expiration.
(3) Each policy and certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that the policy will be maintained throughout the initial term (and during any extension periods) of this Agreement.
(4) The Comprehensive General Liability and Commercial Vehicle liability policies shall be endorsed to contain the following provision: “For any claims related to this Agreement, Subdivider’s coverage shall be primary with respect to the City. Any insurance maintained by the City shall be in excess of Subdivider’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.”
(g) Applicability of Insurance Requirements. All insurance requirements contained in this Agreement are applicable to any contract entered into by Subdivider and/or any of Subdivider’s contractors, subcontractors, agents, and/or employees. Subdivider shall not commence work under this Agreement until Subdivider has obtained all insurance required under this Section, nor shall Subdivider allow any contractor or subcontractor to commence work on his contract or subcontract until all similar insurance required of the contractor or subcontractor shall have been so obtained and approved. Subdivider shall provide the City with not less than thirty (30) days' notice prior to the cancellation, reduction, or termination of any insurance coverages required by this Section. All requirements herein provided shall appear either in the body of the insurance policies or as endorsements and shall specifically bind the insurance carrier.
13. Title to Required Improvements; Risk of Loss
Title to, and ownership of all Required Improvements constructed hereunder by Subdivider shall vest absolutely in City upon completion and acceptance of such Improvements by City. Until such time as the Required Improvements are accepted by City, Subdivider shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the Required Improvements constructed or installed and shall be responsible for the care, maintenance of, and any damage to such Required Improvements. Neither City, nor any of its agents, officers, or employees shall be liable or responsible for any accident, loss, or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to the Required Improvements prior to the completion by Subdivider and acceptance of same by City.
14. Repair or Reconstruction of Defective Work
If, within a period of one year after final acceptance of the Required Improvements and work performed under this Agreement, any structure or part of any structure furnished and/or installed or constructed, or caused to be installed or constructed by Subdivider, or any of the work done under this Agreement, fails to fulfill any of the requirements of this Agreement or the specifications referred to herein, Subdivider shall without delay and without any cost to City, repair or replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or structure. Should Subdivider fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, or should the exigencies of the case require repairs or replacements to be made before Subdivider can be notified, City may, at its option, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and Subdivider shall pay to City the actual cost of such repairs plus fifteen percent (15%).
15. Subdivider not Agent of City
Neither Subdivider nor any of Subdivider’s agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of City in connection with the performance of Subdivider’s obligations under this Agreement.
16. Cost of Engineering and Inspection
Subdivider shall pay City in accordance with Chapter 17, of the Victorville Municipal Code, for all engineering, inspection, and other services furnished by City in connection with the Subdivision.
17. Default; Notice
The following events shall constitute a default under this Agreement: If Subdivider refuses or fails to prosecute the work on the Required Improvements, or any part thereof, with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time specified, or any extension thereof, or fails to complete the Required Improvements within such time; if Subdivider should be adjudged a bankrupt, or Subdivider should make a general assignment for the benefit of Subdivider’s creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed in the event of Subdivider’s insolvency; or if Subdivider or any of Subdivider’s contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees should violate any of the provisions of this Agreement. In the event of Subdivider’s default, the City may serve written notice upon Subdivider and Subdivider’s surety
of the default under this Agreement. Subdivider shall have fifteen (15) days from receipt of written notice by City to cure any such default.
18. Breach of Agreement; Performance by Surety or City (a) In the event Subdivider is in default under this Agreement, and the applicable cure period set forth in Section 17 hereof has expired without such default having been cured by Subdivider, Subdivider shall be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement, and the City may thereafter deliver a notice of breach to Subdivider’s surety, if any, and such surety shall have the duty to take over and complete the work on the Required Improvements; provided, however, that if the surety within fifteen (15) days after the serving of such notice of breach upon it does not give the City written notice of the surety’s intent to take over the performance of the Agreement, or does not commence performance thereof within fifteen (15) days after notice to the City of such election, then the City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract, or by any other method the City may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of the Subdivider, and the Subdivider’s surety shall be liable to the City for any excess cost or damages incurred by the City. In such event, the City, without liability for so doing, may take possession of and utilize in completing the work such materials, appliances, plants or other property belonging to Subdivider as may be on the site of the work and necessary therefor. The remedy provided by this paragraph is in addition to, and not in lieu of, other remedies available to the City. The City reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or in equity for a breach of Subdivider’s obligations under this Agreement.
(b) In addition to any other remedy the City may have, a breach of this Agreement by the Subdivider may result in the Subdivision being reverted to acreage and shall further constitute consent to the filing by the City of a notice of violation against all the lots in the Subdivision. Subdivider agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for Subdivider’s breach shall be in the discretion of the City. If the form of contract security is other than a bond, the City, after giving notice of breach of the Agreement, may proceed to collect against the contract security in the manner provided by law and by the terms of the security instrument.
(c) The failure of City to take an enforcement action with respect to a default, or to declare a default or breach, shall not constitute a waiver of that default or breach, or any subsequent default or breach of Subdivider. Any failure by the City to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision(s) and further shall not act to release any surety from its obligations under this Agreement.
(d) In the event that Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder, Subdivider agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by City in securing performances of such obligations, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney’s fees.
19. Completion; Warranty
(a) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (b) of this Section, upon completion of all the Required Improvements, and upon the City Council authorizing a written Notice of Completion and Acceptance of said work, the City will release all hold and any claims to eighty percent (80%) of the amount of securities posted for faithful performance as specified in Section 10, above. The remaining twenty percent (20%) shall be held by the City for a period of one (1) year after the date of the Notice of Completion as a guarantee (warranty) bond to secure the performance of Section 14 of this Agreement and shall thereafter be released.
(b) The provisions of subdivision (a) of this Section notwithstanding, if the Subdivision is part of any City maintenance assessment district, the faithful performance security shall not be released, and no Required Improvements shall be accepted by the City unless and until Subdivider has paid to City any fees required to operate and maintain the Required Improvements until such time as the City has received the first maintenance assessment disbursement from the County.
(c) The amount specified in Section 10(b) above for labor and materials security shall be reduced or released pursuant to the provisions of Section 66499.7(h) of the Map Act.
20. Notices
All notices required by or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section.
Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City: City of Victorville
Attention: City Engineer
P.O. Box 5001
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92393-5001
With a copy to: Green de Bortnowsky, LLP
30077 Agoura Court, Suite 210
Agoura Hills, CA 91301-2713
Attn: Andre de Bortnowsky, City Attorney
If to Subdivider: Crossings at Victorville, L.P
1667 E. Lincoln Ave
Orange, Ca 92865
If to surety:
Any Party or the surety may change such address by notice in writing to the other Party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to such new address.
21. Recordation
This Agreement shall be recorded in the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office concurrently with the Map and Lien Agreement for the Subdivision.
22. Binding Effect of Agreement
This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns. This Agreement shall constitute a covenant running with the land and an equitable servitude upon the property within the Subdivision.
23. Severability; Entire Agreement
The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified in writing by the mutual consent of the Parties. This Agreement, together with all exhibits, the Lien Agreement, the conditions of approval, and Map(s) expressly referred to herein, constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them with respect to the subject matter hereof.
24. Authority of Executing Parties
The persons executing this Agreement warrant and represent that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of and bind the Party each purports to represent.
25. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits
The Recitals to this Agreement, and any definitions set forth therein, are hereby incorporated into in the terms of this Agreement by this reference. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference:
Exhibit A – Legal Description of Subdivision
Exhibit B – Tract Map No. 17710 (Map)
Exhibit C – Lien Agreement
26. Headings.
The captions and Section headings used in this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to define, limit or affect the construction or interpretation of any term or provision hereof.
27. Modification, Waiver, and Amendment
No breach of this Agreement or of any provision herein may be waived except by an express written waiver executed by the Party waiving such breach. Waiver of any one breach shall not be deemed a waiver of any other breach or provision of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended, altered, modified or otherwise changed only by a writing duly executed by the Parties hereto or their authorized representatives. No modification, waiver, amendment or discharge of this Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by all Parties.
28. Governing Law
This Agreement shall be governed, interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Agreement shall be tried and litigated only in the state courts located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or federal courts located in the Central District of California.
[END OF THIS PAGE - SIGNATURES FOLLOW]
DATED this _______________________ day of ________________ 20____
SUBDIVIDER
Crossings at Victorville, L.P
1667 E. Lincoln Ave
Orange, Ca, 92865
By:
Print Name:
Print Title:
Date:
(Proper Notarization of Subdivider’s
Signature is required and shall be
attached)
CITY
City of Victorville
By:
Name: Elizabeth Becerra
Title: Mayor
(Notarization of Mayor’s Signature is
required and shall be attached)
ATTEST:
By:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Andre De Bortnowsky, City Attorney
Sandra Bostick, Risk Manager
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows:
LOT 1 OF TRACT MAP NO. 17701, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 335 PAGES 65 AND 66 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNY CALIFORNIA.
EXHIBIT B
TRACT MAP
EXHIBIT C
LIEN AGREEMENT
Recording Requested By:
The City of Victorville
When Recorded Please Return to:
City of Victorville
14343 Civic Drive
P O Box 5001
Victorville, CA 92393-5001
APN- 0396-401-01-0000
Recording of this document is fee exempt under
Government Code Section 6103. No Documentary
Transfer Tax is due on the document pursuant to
Revenue Taxation Code Section 11922
LIEN AGREEMENT
(Lien Agreement as Substitute Security)
For
Tract Map No. 17710
This document is exempt from Recording Fees pursuant to Section 27383 of the California Government Code
THIS LIEN AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 20 ,by and among the City of Victorville, a municipal corporation and California charter city, hereinafter called “CITY” and Crossings at Victorville, L.P, hereinafter called “OWNER”. CITY and OWNER are collectively referred to hereinafter as the “PARTIES,” and individually as a “PARTY”.
RECITALS
A. OWNER is the record fee owner of that certain real property situated in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Said real property is hereinafter called the “Property”.
B. Tract Map No. 17701, hereinafter called “Subdivision”, was recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino, for the subdivision of real property within the CITY, evidenced by County Recorder’s Document No. 2011-0459855, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code Section 66410 et seq.) and Title 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code, hereinafter called “Title 17”.
C. A secured Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the CITY dated ____ to perform certain acts and construct certain improvements as a condition of CITY’s approval of said Subdivision has been executed and recorded, evidenced by County Recorder’s Document No. .
D. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Title 17 and Sections 66462 and 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act requires that security satisfactory to the CITY be provided to secure obligations under the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
E. Government Code Section 66499(a)(4) empowers the CITY to adopt an ordinance to allow lien agreements to secure Subdivision Improvement Agreements based upon the CITY finding that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the required improvements sooner than two (2) years after the recordation of the map.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
F. Pursuant to Section 17.64.065 of the Victorville Municipal Code (“VMC”), CITY is authorized to accept a lien agreement for the substitution of an existing security which was furnished under Section 17.64.065, subject to the conditions, requirements and restrictions contained therein.
G. A form of security for the Subdivision Improvement Agreement which OWNER now desires to replace with security known as a Lien Agreement, under the provisions of Government Code Section 66499(a)(4) and Section 17.64.065 of the VMC.
H. CITY has found and determined that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the required improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement sooner than two (2) years after the recordation of the map.
I. OWNER warrants that OWNER has fee title interest to all of the individual lots in the Property, as identified on the Subdivision.
J. Subject to the exceptions provided for by Subsection 17.64.060(d) of the VMC, OWNER has ceased the installation or construction of the improvements required by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement as allowed under the construction permits on the Property as identified on the Subdivision.
K. OWNER has provided a title insurance policy and current title report from a title company approved by the CITY and issued within the 45 days prior to the execution of this Lien Agreement documenting that the OWNER is the record owner of the Property, and the Property is not subject to any mortgages, deeds of trust, or liens.
L. OWNER represents and CITY has confirmed that OWNER has paid all outstanding fees pursuant to Chapter 17.12 of the VMC and has a deposit based fee account in good standing with the CITY.
NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the above recitals, and for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the PARTIES hereto mutually agree as follows:
I. OWNER’s Performance and Obligations:
A. OWNER hereby grants to CITY, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Lien Agreement, a lien upon the Property described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made part hereof, as security for the following obligations of OWNER:
(2) Construction of the improvements specified in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, hereinafter called “Improvements”, pursuant to Section
17.64.050 of the VMC in the estimated amounts and for the purposes specified in the approved Engineer’s Cost Estimate, Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and made part hereof by this reference; provided, however, that OWNER’s obligation under this Agreement shall extend to the actual cost of construction of the Improvements, notwithstanding that such costs may exceed the estimate set forth in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and made part hereof; and
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
(3) Payment of the balance of any fees, including fees for improvements or services described in Title 17 (collectively, “Fees”), in the amount required in accordance with the Victorville Municipal Code.
B. For so long as the Property remains subject to this Lien Agreement, OWNER shall not:
(1) Request issuance by the Department of Real Estate of the Final Subdivision Public Report for the Property;
(2) Transfer, sell, or permit the transfer or sale of any lot shown on the Subdivision; or
(3) Commence work on any portion of the Improvements except as necessary to correct or prevent threats to the public health, safety or general welfare and with the prior written consent or order of the CITY C. Notwithstanding the above, fee title to the entire Property encumbered by this Lien Agreement, or to all lots designated on the Subdivision, may be sold in the aggregate to a single purchaser, provided that the proposed purchaser, prior to assuming title to the Property, executes a new lien agreement or provides alternative security acceptable to the CITY in accordance Section 17.64.065 of the VMC.
D. OWNER shall post with the CITY a cash deposit in the amount of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000) per recorded subdivision Tract Map, regardless of whether the project was subdivided by a single Tract Map or by multiple Tract Map recordings through phasing, for the purpose of reverting the property to acreage if the owner breaches or is in default of the terms of the lien agreement, and to be used by CITY to reimburse CITY for any costs which CITY may incur in processing a reversion to acreage map initiated pursuant to this Lien Agreement. Reversion to acreage and the cash deposit by reason of default or breach of the lien agreement shall only be applicable to properties where none of the required public improvements for which securities were provided, have been installed and/or have been constructed. If the costs of a reversion to acreage of the Subdivision exceed $12,000, OWNER shall pay such additional costs to CITY prior to recordation of the reversion to acreage map. In addition, any unused portion of this deposit may be applied to any outstanding fees for inspection, tests and other related purposes for the required Improvements upon termination of this Lien Agreement. If there are no outstanding fees, any unused portion of such deposit shall be refunded to OWNER following completion of such reversion.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
E. OWNER shall also post with the CITY a cash deposit to be used by the CITY to reimburse the CITY for any costs which the CITY may incur for the maintenance of any portion of Subdivision that has been graded, including but not limited to dust control, erosion control, fencing, maintenance for purposes of the health, safety or welfare of the public, and any other maintenance as reasonably required by the CITY. Said deposit shall be in the amount as approved by the City Engineer.
F. Prior to obtaining any construction permits, including but not limited to grading, construction excavation or water permits, or commencing the installation and construction of any portion of the Improvements required by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, OWNER:
(1) shall substitute other forms of security satisfactory to CITY in place of this Lien Agreement; provided however, OWNER shall not be permitted to obtain said permits, substitute such security or commence the installation and construction of any portion of the Improvements if less than one (1) year has elapsed since the date of recordation of this Lien Agreement; and (2) shall deposit fees for inspections, tests and other related purposes.
G. OWNER agrees to appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the City’s lien upon the Property or the rights or powers of the City with respect to the Property; and also, if at any time the City is a party to or appears in any such action or proceeding, or in any action or proceeding to enforce any obligation hereby secured, to pay all costs and expenses paid or incurred by the City in connection therewith, including, but not limited to, cost of evidence of title and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
OWNER further agrees that upon entry of any judgment, all such costs, expenses and fees shall be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
H. OWNER agrees to indemnify, and hold harmless, the CITY, its officers, employees and agents from any liability whatsoever based or asserted upon any act or omission of OWNER, its officers, employees and agents relating to or in any way connected with the obligations arising under this Lien Agreement. As part of the foregoing indemnity, OWNER agrees to protect and defend at its own expense, including attorneys’ fees, the CITY, its officers, employees and agents in any legal action based upon such alleged acts or omissions.
I. OWNER agrees to pay when due any and all taxes and assessments affecting the Property, and all encumbrances, charges and liens, with interest, on the Property or any part thereof, which appear to be prior or superior to the lien created by this Lien Agreement.
J. OWNER agrees at its sole cost and expense, to maintain and keep the Property in good condition and repair, including but not limited to maintaining storm water facilities, erosion control and fire prevention maintenance activities on the Property; to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the Property; not to commit or permit any waste thereof or any act upon the Property in violation of the law; to cultivate, irrigate, fertilize, fumigate, prune and do all other acts which from the character or use of the Property may be reasonably necessary, the specific enumerations herein not excluding the general.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
K. OWNER agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for OWNER’s default or breach of this Lien Agreement shall be in the sole discretion of the CITY.
L. OWNER has provided the City with sufficient evidence that the estimated costs for the remaining required improvements, as determined by the City Engineer, including, but not limited to, master planned or “missing link” streets, drainage and sewer improvements, community facilities, off-site improvements, fire access, fire flow and traffic signals, originally required by conditions of approval, do not exceed the fair market value of the property based on a recent opinion of an independent, licensed real estate appraiser, which appraisal shall be furnished to the CITY not fewer than forty- five (45) days prior to entering into any Lien Agreement as determined by the City Engineer.
II. City’s Performance and Obligations:
A. CITY, upon recordation of this Lien Agreement, shall release deposits and/or security which were previously supplied to the CITY and for which this Lien Agreement is being substituted.
B. Pursuant to Section I.E hereof, upon delivery by OWNER and acceptance by the City Council of one of the securities as specified by Section 17.64.060 of the VMC in replacement of this Lien Agreement, and upon OWNER’s request, the CITY shall release the Property from the provisions of this Lien Agreement and shall execute any necessary release in a form as required by law to enable the OWNER or its transferee to clear the record of title of the Property so release of the lien herein is achieved.
C. Upon delivery by OWNER and acceptance by the City Council, of a replacement of this Lien Agreement pursuant to Section I.F hereof, by one of the securities as specified by Section 17.64.060 of the VMC and, upon OWNER’s request, the CITY shall release all remaining amounts of deposits paid pursuant to Sections I.D and I.E hereof.
D. In no instance shall this Lien Agreement compel the City to construct the required Improvements.
III. Effect of Lien Agreement.
A. This Lien Agreement creates and constitutes a secured obligation in the form of a lien against the Property for the purposes of securing OWNER’s performance of this Lien Agreement and the Improvement Agreement. From the date of recordation of this Lien Agreement, a lien shall attach to the entire Property which shall have the priority of a judgment lien in an amount necessary to discharge all obligations contained in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, this Lien Agreement and any Fees. The CITY shall under no circumstances be obligated to subordinate the lien, but may do so in its sole and absolute discretion in a manner provided by law.
B. OWNER shall have the right to convey fee title of the entire Property encumbered by this Lien Agreement to a single purchaser, so long as the proposed purchaser, prior to assuming title to the Property,
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
(1) executes a new lien agreement or provides alternative security acceptable to the CITY in accordance Section 17.64.060 of the VMC; and (2) purchaser agrees in writing to accept and be bound by the terms and provisions of the applicable Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
C. Notwithstanding any provisions of Title 17 of the VMC to the contrary, so long as this Lien Agreement is utilized for security as described herein, the CITY is not obligated to accept offers of dedication for street or drainage purposes on the Property.
IV. Events of Default; Breach. Upon the occurrence of any one of the following events, OWNER shall be deemed in default hereunder if OWNER fails to cure such occurrence within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice of default from the CITY; provided, however, that if such event is of such a nature that it cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period, then OWNER shall not be in default if it commences a cure in good faith within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes the cure to completion:
A. Commencement of any work on the Improvements by OWNER, its agents or employees, prior to substitution of acceptable security with the CITY in place of this Lien Agreement, except as specifically authorized by CITY with prior authorization in writing or by order to correct or prevent threats to the public health, safety or general welfare;
B. Filing of any proceedings or action by or against OWNER to declare OWNER bankrupt or to appoint a receiver or trustee for OWNER or to reorganize OWNER or to make an assignment for the benefit of creditors or to do anything else of a similar nature or purpose under any state or federal bankruptcy or insolvency laws, if such proceedings or actions are not discharged within sixty (60) days;
C. Levy of any attachment or writ of execution against OWNER and the Property whereby the Property is taken or occupied or attempted to be taken or occupied by someone other than OWNER and such attachment or execution is not released within sixty (60) days;
D. Sale of any lot shown on the Subdivision prior to release of the lien created by this Lien Agreement, except as provided in Section III.B hereof;
E. Request by OWNER of issuance by the Department of Real Estate of the Final Subdivision Public Report for the Property;
F. Allowing the Property to be maintained in manner that falls below the required maintenance satisfactory to the CITY or as required by Section I.J hereof; G. The attachment of any other lien or judgment lien upon the Property; H. Breach by OWNER of any other term or condition of this Lien Agreement or of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement or OWNER’s failure to fully and faithfully discharge its obligations hereunder within the time specified herein.
All references to OWNER in this Section shall be deemed to include OWNER’s successors, assignees and transferees.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
V. CITY’s Remedies. Upon the occurrence of any of the events described in Section IV, above, CITY may declare a breach of this Lien Agreement if OWNER fails to cure or to diligently prosecute the cure to completion, and the CITY, at CITY’s option, may exercise any one or more of the following remedies:
A. Pursue any or all of the remedies provided in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and all remedies available to it by law;
B. Enforce this lien by appropriate action in court or as provided by law and in the event the enforcement is by action in court, the OWNER agrees that the amount of said lien shall include reasonable attorneys’ fees which shall be taxed as a cost in any suit for such enforcement;
C. Estimate the cost of the work required to complete the Improvements, and all Fees, and foreclose said lien in said amount;
D. Rescind the approval of any and all entitlements, permits or licenses associated with the Subdivision;
E. Initiate proceedings for reversion of the real property within the land division to acreage, at the expense of OWNER, in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and Chapter 17.92 of the VMC;
F. Pursue any other remedy, legal or equitable, for the foreclosure of a lien. OWNER, its heirs and assigns, shall pay reasonable attorneys’ fees to be taxed as a cost in said proceedings.
The failure of the CITY to take an enforcement action with respect to a default, or to declare a default or breach, shall not constitute a waiver of that default or breach, or any subsequent default or breach of OWNER.
VI. General Provisions.
A. Recordation. This Lien Agreement shall be recorded by CITY in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County immediately following execution of this Lien Agreement.
B. Contingency. This Lien Agreement shall not take effect until it has been approved by the CITY and it has been recorded against the Property.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
C. Final Integrated Agreement. This Lien Agreement is intended to be the final expression of understanding between the Parties and supersedes any and all prior restrictions, promises, representations, warranties, agreements, understandings and undertakings between the Parties with respect to the within subject matter. No other statement or representation, written or oral, express or implied, has been received or relied upon entering into this Lien Agreement. All prior discussions, statements and negotiations shall be deemed merged into this Lien Agreement.
D. Further Assurances. The Parties agree to perform such further acts and to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the provisions of this Lien Agreement and the intentions of the Parties.
E. Governing Law. This Lien Agreement shall be governed, interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Lien Agreement shall be tried and litigated only in the state courts located in the County of San Bernardino, Sate of California, or federal courts located in the Central District of California.
F. Headings. The captions and Section headings used in this Lien Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to define, limit or affect the construction or interpretation of any term or provision hereof.
G. Modification, Waiver and Amendment. No breach of this Lien Agreement or of any provision herein may be waived except by an express written waiver executed by the Party waiving such breach. Waiver of any one breach shall not be deemed a waiver of any other breach or provision of this Lien Agreement. This Lien Agreement may be amended, altered, modified or otherwise changed only by a writing duly executed by the Parties hereto or their authorized representatives. No modification, waiver, amendment or discharge of this Lien Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by all Parties.
H. No Other Inducement. The making, execution and delivery of this Lien Agreement by the Parties hereto has been induced by no representations, statements, warranties or agreements other than those expressed herein.
I. Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Lien Agreement is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Lien Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each term, provision, covenant or condition of this Lien Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
J. Successors and Assigns. This Lien Agreement shall run with the land and inure to the benefit of and bind all Parties hereto, their heirs, devisees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns.
K. Attorney Fees. In the event any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce the terms of this Lien Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
L. OWNER not Agent of CITY. Neither OWNER nor any of OWNER’s officers, directors, agents, employees, or contractors, or successors in interest are or shall be considered to be agents of the CITY in connection with the performance of any of the OWNER’s obligations under this Lien Agreement.
M. Notice. All notices required by or provided under this Lien Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail.
Notice to CITY: City of Victorville
Attention: City Engineer
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
Notice to Owner: Crossings at Victorville, L.P.,
1667 E. Lincoln Ave.
Orange, Ca 92865
With Copy to: City Attorney, City of Victorville
Green, de Bortnowsky and Quintanilla
23801 Calabasas Road, Suite 1015
Calabasas, CA 91302-1595
N. Counterparts. This Lien Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed as original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
O. Authority. Each person signing this Lien Agreement warrants that s/he is duly authorized to execute this Lien Agreement on behalf of and bind the Party each purports to represent.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Lien Agreement.
OWNER
Crossings at Victorville, L.P., (Investment Concepts, Inc., General Partner)
Address:1667 E. Lincoln Ave., Orange, Ca 92865
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
(Note: owner signatures require an attached notary acknowledgement statement)
CITY
By:
Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor
Attest:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Andre De Bortnowsky, City Attorney
Sandra Bostick, Risk Management:
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernadino, State of California, described as follows:
LOT 1 OF TRACT MAP NO. 17701, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 335 PAGES 65 AND 66 OF MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDNO COUNTY
APN: 0396-401-01-0-000
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE
EXHIBIT “B"
APPROVED:11/14/2025ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Attachment I
Lien Agreement
Recording Requested By:
The City of Victorville
When Recorded Please Return to:
City of Victorville
14343 Civic Drive
P O Box 5001
Victorville, CA 92393-5001
APN- 0396-401-01-0000
Recording of this document is fee exempt under
Government Code Section 6103. No Documentary
Transfer Tax is due on the document pursuant to
Revenue Taxation Code Section 11922
LIEN AGREEMENT
(Lien Agreement as Substitute Security)
For
Tract Map No. 17710
This document is exempt from Recording Fees pursuant to Section 27383 of the California Government Code
THIS LIEN AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 20 ,by and among the City of Victorville, a municipal corporation and California charter city, hereinafter called “CITY” and Crossings at Victorville, L.P, hereinafter called “OWNER”. CITY and OWNER are collectively referred to hereinafter as the “PARTIES,” and individually as a “PARTY”.
RECITALS
A. OWNER is the record fee owner of that certain real property situated in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Said real property is hereinafter called the “Property”.
B. Tract Map No. 17701, hereinafter called “Subdivision”, was recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino, for the subdivision of real property within the CITY, evidenced by County Recorder’s Document No. 2011-0459855, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code Section 66410 et seq.) and Title 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code, hereinafter called “Title 17”.
C. A secured Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the CITY dated ____ to perform certain acts and construct certain improvements as a condition of CITY’s approval of said Subdivision has been executed and recorded, evidenced by County Recorder’s Document No. .
D. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Title 17 and Sections 66462 and 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act requires that security satisfactory to the CITY be provided to secure obligations under the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
E. Government Code Section 66499(a)(4) empowers the CITY to adopt an ordinance to allow lien agreements to secure Subdivision Improvement Agreements based upon the CITY finding that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the required improvements sooner than two (2) years after the recordation of the map.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
F. Pursuant to Section 17.64.065 of the Victorville Municipal Code (“VMC”), CITY is authorized to accept a lien agreement for the substitution of an existing security which was furnished under Section 17.64.065, subject to the conditions, requirements and restrictions contained therein.
G. A form of security for the Subdivision Improvement Agreement which OWNER now desires to replace with security known as a Lien Agreement, under the provisions of Government Code Section 66499(a)(4) and Section 17.64.065 of the VMC.
H. CITY has found and determined that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the required improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement sooner than two (2) years after the recordation of the map.
I. OWNER warrants that OWNER has fee title interest to all of the individual lots in the Property, as identified on the Subdivision.
J. Subject to the exceptions provided for by Subsection 17.64.060(d) of the VMC, OWNER has ceased the installation or construction of the improvements required by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement as allowed under the construction permits on the Property as identified on the Subdivision.
K. OWNER has provided a title insurance policy and current title report from a title company approved by the CITY and issued within the 45 days prior to the execution of this Lien Agreement documenting that the OWNER is the record owner of the Property, and the Property is not subject to any mortgages, deeds of trust, or liens.
L. OWNER represents and CITY has confirmed that OWNER has paid all outstanding fees pursuant to Chapter 17.12 of the VMC and has a deposit based fee account in good standing with the CITY.
NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the above recitals, and for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the PARTIES hereto mutually agree as follows:
I. OWNER’s Performance and Obligations:
A. OWNER hereby grants to CITY, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Lien Agreement, a lien upon the Property described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made part hereof, as security for the following obligations of OWNER:
(2) Construction of the improvements specified in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, hereinafter called “Improvements”, pursuant to Section
17.64.050 of the VMC in the estimated amounts and for the purposes specified in the approved Engineer’s Cost Estimate, Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and made part hereof by this reference; provided, however, that OWNER’s obligation under this Agreement shall extend to the actual cost of construction of the Improvements, notwithstanding that such costs may exceed the estimate set forth in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and made part hereof; and
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
(3) Payment of the balance of any fees, including fees for improvements or services described in Title 17 (collectively, “Fees”), in the amount required in accordance with the Victorville Municipal Code.
B. For so long as the Property remains subject to this Lien Agreement, OWNER shall not:
(1) Request issuance by the Department of Real Estate of the Final Subdivision Public Report for the Property;
(2) Transfer, sell, or permit the transfer or sale of any lot shown on the Subdivision; or
(3) Commence work on any portion of the Improvements except as necessary to correct or prevent threats to the public health, safety or general welfare and with the prior written consent or order of the CITY C. Notwithstanding the above, fee title to the entire Property encumbered by this Lien Agreement, or to all lots designated on the Subdivision, may be sold in the aggregate to a single purchaser, provided that the proposed purchaser, prior to assuming title to the Property, executes a new lien agreement or provides alternative security acceptable to the CITY in accordance Section 17.64.065 of the VMC.
D. OWNER shall post with the CITY a cash deposit in the amount of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000) per recorded subdivision Tract Map, regardless of whether the project was subdivided by a single Tract Map or by multiple Tract Map recordings through phasing, for the purpose of reverting the property to acreage if the owner breaches or is in default of the terms of the lien agreement, and to be used by CITY to reimburse CITY for any costs which CITY may incur in processing a reversion to acreage map initiated pursuant to this Lien Agreement. Reversion to acreage and the cash deposit by reason of default or breach of the lien agreement shall only be applicable to properties where none of the required public improvements for which securities were provided, have been installed and/or have been constructed. If the costs of a reversion to acreage of the Subdivision exceed $12,000, OWNER shall pay such additional costs to CITY prior to recordation of the reversion to acreage map. In addition, any unused portion of this deposit may be applied to any outstanding fees for inspection, tests and other related purposes for the required Improvements upon termination of this Lien Agreement. If there are no outstanding fees, any unused portion of such deposit shall be refunded to OWNER following completion of such reversion.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
E. OWNER shall also post with the CITY a cash deposit to be used by the CITY to reimburse the CITY for any costs which the CITY may incur for the maintenance of any portion of Subdivision that has been graded, including but not limited to dust control, erosion control, fencing, maintenance for purposes of the health, safety or welfare of the public, and any other maintenance as reasonably required by the CITY. Said deposit shall be in the amount as approved by the City Engineer.
F. Prior to obtaining any construction permits, including but not limited to grading, construction excavation or water permits, or commencing the installation and construction of any portion of the Improvements required by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, OWNER:
(1) shall substitute other forms of security satisfactory to CITY in place of this Lien Agreement; provided however, OWNER shall not be permitted to obtain said permits, substitute such security or commence the installation and construction of any portion of the Improvements if less than one (1) year has elapsed since the date of recordation of this Lien Agreement; and (2) shall deposit fees for inspections, tests and other related purposes.
G. OWNER agrees to appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the City’s lien upon the Property or the rights or powers of the City with respect to the Property; and also, if at any time the City is a party to or appears in any such action or proceeding, or in any action or proceeding to enforce any obligation hereby secured, to pay all costs and expenses paid or incurred by the City in connection therewith, including, but not limited to, cost of evidence of title and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
OWNER further agrees that upon entry of any judgment, all such costs, expenses and fees shall be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
H. OWNER agrees to indemnify, and hold harmless, the CITY, its officers, employees and agents from any liability whatsoever based or asserted upon any act or omission of OWNER, its officers, employees and agents relating to or in any way connected with the obligations arising under this Lien Agreement. As part of the foregoing indemnity, OWNER agrees to protect and defend at its own expense, including attorneys’ fees, the CITY, its officers, employees and agents in any legal action based upon such alleged acts or omissions.
I. OWNER agrees to pay when due any and all taxes and assessments affecting the Property, and all encumbrances, charges and liens, with interest, on the Property or any part thereof, which appear to be prior or superior to the lien created by this Lien Agreement.
J. OWNER agrees at its sole cost and expense, to maintain and keep the Property in good condition and repair, including but not limited to maintaining storm water facilities, erosion control and fire prevention maintenance activities on the Property; to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the Property; not to commit or permit any waste thereof or any act upon the Property in violation of the law; to cultivate, irrigate, fertilize, fumigate, prune and do all other acts which from the character or use of the Property may be reasonably necessary, the specific enumerations herein not excluding the general.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
K. OWNER agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for OWNER’s default or breach of this Lien Agreement shall be in the sole discretion of the CITY.
L. OWNER has provided the City with sufficient evidence that the estimated costs for the remaining required improvements, as determined by the City Engineer, including, but not limited to, master planned or “missing link” streets, drainage and sewer improvements, community facilities, off-site improvements, fire access, fire flow and traffic signals, originally required by conditions of approval, do not exceed the fair market value of the property based on a recent opinion of an independent, licensed real estate appraiser, which appraisal shall be furnished to the CITY not fewer than forty- five (45) days prior to entering into any Lien Agreement as determined by the City Engineer.
II. City’s Performance and Obligations:
A. CITY, upon recordation of this Lien Agreement, shall release deposits and/or security which were previously supplied to the CITY and for which this Lien Agreement is being substituted.
B. Pursuant to Section I.E hereof, upon delivery by OWNER and acceptance by the City Council of one of the securities as specified by Section 17.64.060 of the VMC in replacement of this Lien Agreement, and upon OWNER’s request, the CITY shall release the Property from the provisions of this Lien Agreement and shall execute any necessary release in a form as required by law to enable the OWNER or its transferee to clear the record of title of the Property so release of the lien herein is achieved.
C. Upon delivery by OWNER and acceptance by the City Council, of a replacement of this Lien Agreement pursuant to Section I.F hereof, by one of the securities as specified by Section 17.64.060 of the VMC and, upon OWNER’s request, the CITY shall release all remaining amounts of deposits paid pursuant to Sections I.D and I.E hereof.
D. In no instance shall this Lien Agreement compel the City to construct the required Improvements.
III. Effect of Lien Agreement.
A. This Lien Agreement creates and constitutes a secured obligation in the form of a lien against the Property for the purposes of securing OWNER’s performance of this Lien Agreement and the Improvement Agreement. From the date of recordation of this Lien Agreement, a lien shall attach to the entire Property which shall have the priority of a judgment lien in an amount necessary to discharge all obligations contained in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, this Lien Agreement and any Fees. The CITY shall under no circumstances be obligated to subordinate the lien, but may do so in its sole and absolute discretion in a manner provided by law.
B. OWNER shall have the right to convey fee title of the entire Property encumbered by this Lien Agreement to a single purchaser, so long as the proposed purchaser, prior to assuming title to the Property,
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
(1) executes a new lien agreement or provides alternative security acceptable to the CITY in accordance Section 17.64.060 of the VMC; and (2) purchaser agrees in writing to accept and be bound by the terms and provisions of the applicable Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
C. Notwithstanding any provisions of Title 17 of the VMC to the contrary, so long as this Lien Agreement is utilized for security as described herein, the CITY is not obligated to accept offers of dedication for street or drainage purposes on the Property.
IV. Events of Default; Breach. Upon the occurrence of any one of the following events, OWNER shall be deemed in default hereunder if OWNER fails to cure such occurrence within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice of default from the CITY; provided, however, that if such event is of such a nature that it cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period, then OWNER shall not be in default if it commences a cure in good faith within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes the cure to completion:
A. Commencement of any work on the Improvements by OWNER, its agents or employees, prior to substitution of acceptable security with the CITY in place of this Lien Agreement, except as specifically authorized by CITY with prior authorization in writing or by order to correct or prevent threats to the public health, safety or general welfare;
B. Filing of any proceedings or action by or against OWNER to declare OWNER bankrupt or to appoint a receiver or trustee for OWNER or to reorganize OWNER or to make an assignment for the benefit of creditors or to do anything else of a similar nature or purpose under any state or federal bankruptcy or insolvency laws, if such proceedings or actions are not discharged within sixty (60) days;
C. Levy of any attachment or writ of execution against OWNER and the Property whereby the Property is taken or occupied or attempted to be taken or occupied by someone other than OWNER and such attachment or execution is not released within sixty (60) days;
D. Sale of any lot shown on the Subdivision prior to release of the lien created by this Lien Agreement, except as provided in Section III.B hereof;
E. Request by OWNER of issuance by the Department of Real Estate of the Final Subdivision Public Report for the Property;
F. Allowing the Property to be maintained in manner that falls below the required maintenance satisfactory to the CITY or as required by Section I.J hereof; G. The attachment of any other lien or judgment lien upon the Property; H. Breach by OWNER of any other term or condition of this Lien Agreement or of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement or OWNER’s failure to fully and faithfully discharge its obligations hereunder within the time specified herein.
All references to OWNER in this Section shall be deemed to include OWNER’s successors, assignees and transferees.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
V. CITY’s Remedies. Upon the occurrence of any of the events described in Section IV, above, CITY may declare a breach of this Lien Agreement if OWNER fails to cure or to diligently prosecute the cure to completion, and the CITY, at CITY’s option, may exercise any one or more of the following remedies:
A. Pursue any or all of the remedies provided in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and all remedies available to it by law;
B. Enforce this lien by appropriate action in court or as provided by law and in the event the enforcement is by action in court, the OWNER agrees that the amount of said lien shall include reasonable attorneys’ fees which shall be taxed as a cost in any suit for such enforcement;
C. Estimate the cost of the work required to complete the Improvements, and all Fees, and foreclose said lien in said amount;
D. Rescind the approval of any and all entitlements, permits or licenses associated with the Subdivision;
E. Initiate proceedings for reversion of the real property within the land division to acreage, at the expense of OWNER, in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and Chapter 17.92 of the VMC;
F. Pursue any other remedy, legal or equitable, for the foreclosure of a lien. OWNER, its heirs and assigns, shall pay reasonable attorneys’ fees to be taxed as a cost in said proceedings.
The failure of the CITY to take an enforcement action with respect to a default, or to declare a default or breach, shall not constitute a waiver of that default or breach, or any subsequent default or breach of OWNER.
VI. General Provisions.
A. Recordation. This Lien Agreement shall be recorded by CITY in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County immediately following execution of this Lien Agreement.
B. Contingency. This Lien Agreement shall not take effect until it has been approved by the CITY and it has been recorded against the Property.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
C. Final Integrated Agreement. This Lien Agreement is intended to be the final expression of understanding between the Parties and supersedes any and all prior restrictions, promises, representations, warranties, agreements, understandings and undertakings between the Parties with respect to the within subject matter. No other statement or representation, written or oral, express or implied, has been received or relied upon entering into this Lien Agreement. All prior discussions, statements and negotiations shall be deemed merged into this Lien Agreement.
D. Further Assurances. The Parties agree to perform such further acts and to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the provisions of this Lien Agreement and the intentions of the Parties.
E. Governing Law. This Lien Agreement shall be governed, interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Lien Agreement shall be tried and litigated only in the state courts located in the County of San Bernardino, Sate of California, or federal courts located in the Central District of California.
F. Headings. The captions and Section headings used in this Lien Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to define, limit or affect the construction or interpretation of any term or provision hereof.
G. Modification, Waiver and Amendment. No breach of this Lien Agreement or of any provision herein may be waived except by an express written waiver executed by the Party waiving such breach. Waiver of any one breach shall not be deemed a waiver of any other breach or provision of this Lien Agreement. This Lien Agreement may be amended, altered, modified or otherwise changed only by a writing duly executed by the Parties hereto or their authorized representatives. No modification, waiver, amendment or discharge of this Lien Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by all Parties.
H. No Other Inducement. The making, execution and delivery of this Lien Agreement by the Parties hereto has been induced by no representations, statements, warranties or agreements other than those expressed herein.
I. Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Lien Agreement is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Lien Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each term, provision, covenant or condition of this Lien Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
J. Successors and Assigns. This Lien Agreement shall run with the land and inure to the benefit of and bind all Parties hereto, their heirs, devisees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns.
K. Attorney Fees. In the event any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce the terms of this Lien Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
L. OWNER not Agent of CITY. Neither OWNER nor any of OWNER’s officers, directors, agents, employees, or contractors, or successors in interest are or shall be considered to be agents of the CITY in connection with the performance of any of the OWNER’s obligations under this Lien Agreement.
M. Notice. All notices required by or provided under this Lien Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail.
Notice to CITY: City of Victorville
Attention: City Engineer
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
Notice to Owner: Crossings at Victorville, L.P.,
1667 E. Lincoln Ave.
Orange, Ca 92865
With Copy to: City Attorney, City of Victorville
Green, de Bortnowsky and Quintanilla
23801 Calabasas Road, Suite 1015
Calabasas, CA 91302-1595
N. Counterparts. This Lien Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed as original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
O. Authority. Each person signing this Lien Agreement warrants that s/he is duly authorized to execute this Lien Agreement on behalf of and bind the Party each purports to represent.
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Lien Agreement.
OWNER
Crossings at Victorville, L.P., (Investment Concepts, Inc., General Partner)
Address:1667 E. Lincoln Ave., Orange, Ca 92865
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
(Note: owner signatures require an attached notary acknowledgement statement)
CITY
By:
Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor
Attest:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Andre De Bortnowsky, City Attorney
Sandra Bostick, Risk Management:
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the City of Victorville, County of San Bernadino, State of California, described as follows:
LOT 1 OF TRACT MAP NO. 17701, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 335 PAGES 65 AND 66 OF MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDNO COUNTY
APN: 0396-401-01-0-000
TR 17701
Lien Agreement
ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE
EXHIBIT “B"
STREETS
Item Description
P.C. CONCRETE CONT'D
6" Thick Residential Drive Approach,
per City Standard S-02 (18' wide)
6" Thick Residential Drive Approach for
Knuckles & Cul-de-Sacs,
Iper Citv Standard S-02A (24' wide)
6" Thick Residential Drive Approach,
per City Standard S-02 (24' wide)
8" Thick Commercial Drive Approach, Type
1 per Citv Standard S-03
8" Thick Commercial Drive Approach, Type
2, per Citv Standard S-03
8" Thick Commercial Drive Approach, Type
3 per City Standard S-03
Curb Ramp oer Citv Standard S-11A
P.C.C. Allev Intersection
Reinforced Concrete
MISCELLANEOUS UTILITIES
Dry Utility Trenching
UNDERGROUNDING EXIST. UTILITIES
Relocate Power Poles
Remove Power Poles
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT NO: ESUB25-00004 ---------------------
LO CAT 1O N: SW corner of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
DATE: 10/31/2025
BY: Allard Engineering
Quantitv Unit Cost Unit
$6.13 S.F. $
$6.13 S.F. $
3,000 $6.13 S.F. $
$12.50 S.F. $
$12.50 S.F. $
$12.50 S.F. $
$5,000.00 EA $
$9.50 S.F. $
$575.00 C.Y. $
$
$
$
$
Sub Total P.C. Concrete: $
L.F. $
$
$
Sub Total Miscellaneous Utilities $
$30,000.00 EA $
EA $
$
$
$
Cost
-
-
18,390.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
103,890.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
II
Sub Total Undergrounding of Existing Utilities $ -
MISCELLANEOUS
Earthwork Cut $18.00 C.Y. $ -
Earthwork Fill $25.00 C.Y. $ -
Trenching $3.50 L.F. $ -
Backfill $3.50 L.F. $ -
Crushed AB. under Sidewalk $5.00 SF $ -
Adjust Manhole to Grade 6 $250.00 EA $ 1,500.00
Saw Cut 1,160 $0.75 L.F. $ 870.00
Truncated Dome Panels per APWA $600.00 EA $ -
Standard 111-3
STREETS
Item Description
Tree Removal
MISCELLANEOUS CONT'D
Tree Wells & Covers
Hand Railinqs
Street Liqhtinq
Street Light (Relocate)
Wheel Chair Ramo
TRAFFIC CONTROL
Striping Removals
2" to 4" wide Pavement Stripinq
4" wide Pavement Stripinq
8" wide Pavement Striping
12" wide Pavement Striping
Pavement Markinqs
Traffic Siqns
Street Name Signs
Sign Removals
Replace Vehicle Detector Loops
Guard Rail/Barricade
Guide Markers
Remove Temporary Turnaround
Construct Temoorarv Turnaround
Traffic Control Plans
Install End Sign
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT NO: ESUB25-00004 ---------------------
LO CAT 1O N: SW corner of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
DATE: 10/31/2025
BY: Allard Engineering
Quantitv Unit Cost Unit
$665.00 EA $
$85.00 EA $
$45.00 LF $
$2,500.00 AC $
4 $1,500.00 EA $
7 $1,120.00 EA $
$
$
Sub Total Miscellaneous: $
$2.00 L.F. $
$2.00 L.F. $
$1.00 L.F. $
$2.00 L.F. $
$3.00 L.F. $
1 $250.00 EA $
1 $275.00 EA $
$383.33 EA $
$175.00 EA $
$400.00 EA $
30 $48.00 L.F. $
19 $18.00 EA $
$710.00 EA $
$1,400.00 EA $
LS. $
2 $275.00 AE $
$
$
$
Sub Total Traffic Control: $
Sub-Total Streets: $
10% Contingency:! $
TOTAL STREET COST: $
Cost
-
-
-
-
6,000.00
7,840.00
-
-
16,210.00
-
-
-
-
-
250.00
275.00
-
-
-
1,440.00
342.00
-
-
-
550.00
-
-
-
2,857.00
387 705.50
38,770.55 I
426 476.05
PLAN & PERMIT FEE CALCULATION FORMULA $ 15,794.28
$0-$50,000 is 5% of Cost Est. $ 2,500.00
$50,001-$250,000 is 4% of Cost Est. $ 8,000.00
$250,001 + is 3% of Cost Est. $ 5,294.28
PROJECT NO:
LOCATION:
DATE:
SEWER BY:
Item Description Quantity
PIPES
4" PVC/VCP Lateral per Standard SS-03
6" PVC/VCP Lateral Per Standard SS-03
8" PVC/VCP Sewer Main 1,470
1 O" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
12" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
15" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
18" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
21" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
24" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
27" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
30" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
33" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
36" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
39" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
42" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
45" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
48" PVC/VCP Sewer Main
Cast Iron Pipe
MANHOLES
48" Diameter Manhole per Standard SS-01 6
60" Diameter Manhole per Standard SS-01
48" Sewer Drop Manhole per Standard SS-07
60" Drop Manhole per SS-07A
Sewer Manhole w/lntemal Sewer Main Drop per
Standard SS-07 A
Adjust Manhole To Grade
Connect to Exist. Manhole
Reconstruct Manhole Bottom
Concrete, Class 1, 3250 PSI (Manhole Bases, Sewer
Saddles etc.)
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
ESUB25-00004
SW comer of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
10/31/2025
Allard Engineering
Unit Cost Unit Cost
$ 60.00 L.F. $
$ 65.00 L.F. $
$
$ 75.00 L.F. $
$ 80.00 L.F. $
$ 85.00 L.F. $
$ 100.00 L.F. $
$ 120.00 L.F. $
$ 145.00 L.F. $
$ 170.00 L.F. $
$ 185.00 L.F. $
$ 195.00 L.F. $
$ 210.00 L.F. $
$ 225.00 L.F. $
$ 240.00 L.F. $
$ 260.00 L.F. $
$ 280.00 L.F. $
$ 300.00 L.F. $
$
$ 8.25 L.F. $
$
$
Sub Total Pipes: $
$ 2,500.00 EA $
$ 7,500.00 EA $
$ 3,250.00 EA $
$ 5,750.00 EA $
$ 8,000.00 EA $
$ 400.00 EA $
$ 2,500.00 EA $
$ 1,000.00 EA $
C.Y. $
$
$
Sub Total Manholes: $
-
-
-
110,250
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
110,250
15,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15,000
PROJECT NO:
LOCATION:
DATE:
SEWER BY:
Item Description Quantity
SADDLES/REPAIR
Sewer Saddle per Standard SS-09
Sewer Clean Out per Standard SS-04
Saddle Connection
Adjust Cleanout To Grade
Trench Repair
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
Extra Depth Construction ( 10'-12')
Extra Depth Construction (12'-14')
Extra Depth Construction (14'-16')
Extra Depth Construction (16'-18')
Extra Depth Construction (18'-20')
Extra Depth Construction (20'-22')
Extra Depth Construction (22'-24')
Extra Depth Construction (24'-26')
Jack and Bore Operations
CASING
16" Steel Casing
24" Steel Casing
30" Steel Casing
36" Steel Casing
Concrete Encasement
Special Encasement
BEDDING
Pipe Bedding, Less than 18"
Pipe Bedding, Greater than 18"
Unstable Bedding
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
ESUB25-00004
SW comer of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
10/31/2025
Allard Engineering
Unit Cost Unit Cost
$ 250.00 EA $
$ 600.00 EA $
$ 1,000.00 EA $
$ 200.00 EA $
$ 3.50 S.F. $
$
$
Sub Total Saddles/Repair: $
$ 4.15 L.F. $
$ 7.00 L.F. $
$ 10.00 L.F. $
$ 13.00 L.F. $
$ 16.00 L.F. $
$ 19.00 L.F. $
$ 22.00 L.F. $
$ 25.00 L.F. $
$
$ 1,100.00 L.F. $
$
$
Sub Total Special Construction: $
$ 80.00 L.F. $
$ 100.00 L.F. $
$ 125.00 L.F. $
$ 150.00 L.F. $
$
$ 25.00 L.F. $
$ 35.00 L.F. $
$
$
$
Sub Total Casing: $
$ 2.50 L.F. $
$ 5.00 L.F. $
$ 7.00 L.F. $
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
PROJECT NO:
LOCATION:
DATE:
SEWER BY:
Item Description Quantity
BEDDING CONT'D
MISCELLANEOUS
Breaking Pavement & Resurface - A.C.
Breking Pavement & Resurface - Concrete
Stub & Plug Ends
Chimneys
Backwater Valve
Tees & Wyes
TV Inspections
T raffle Control
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
ESUB25-00004
SW comer of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
10/31/2025
Allard Engineering
Unit Cost Unit Cost
$
Sub Total Bedding: $
$ 7.00 S.F. $
$ 13.00 S.F. $
$ 100.00 EA $
$ 900.00 EA $
$ 350.00 EA $
$ 90.00 EA $
$ 1.75 L.F. $
LS $
$
$
$
Sub Total Miscellaneous: $
Sub-Total Sewer: $
10% Contingency:! $
TOTAL SEWER COST:I $
PLAN & PERMIT FEE CALCULATION FORMULA $ 6,011.00
$0-$50,000 is 5% of Cost Est $ 2,500.00
$50,001-$250,000 is 4% of Cost Est. $ 3,511.00
$250,001 + is 3% of Cost Est. $ -
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
125,250
12,525 I
137,77s 1
WATER
Item Description
MAINLINE
4" PVC C-900, Class 305
6" PVC C-900, Class 305
8" PVC C-900, Class 305
1 O" PVC C-900, Class 305
12" PVC C-900, Class 305
16" PVC C-905, Class 235
18" PVC C-905, Class 235
20" PVC C-905, Class 235
24" PVC C-905, Class 235
4" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
6" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
8" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
10" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
12" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
16" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
18" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
20" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
24" CMLC Pipe, 10GA Min. Steel Wall Thickness
4"CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
6" CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
8" CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
10" CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
12" CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
MAINLINE (cont'd)
16" CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
18" CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
20" CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
24" CMLC Pipe, 0.25" Min. Steel Wall Thickness
HOT TAP
Hot Tap - 4"
Hot Tap - 6"
Hot Tap - 8"
Hot Tap -1 0"
Hot Tap -12"
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT NO: ESUB25-00004
LOCATION: SW corner of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
DATE: 1 0/31 /2025
BY: Allard Engineering
Quantity Unit Cost Unit
$ 31.00 L.F. $
$ 42.00 L.F. $
1,476 $ 55.00 L.F. $
$ 62.00 L.F. $
964 $ 68.00 L.F. $
$ 84.00 L.F. $
$ 106.00 L.F. $
$ 124.00 L.F. $
$ 289.00 L.F. $
$
$ 31.00 L.F. $
$ 42.00 L.F. $
$ 55.00 L.F. $
$ 62.00 L.F. $
$ 68.00 L.F. $
$ 84.00 L.F. $
$ 106.00 L.F. $
$ 124.00 L.F. $
$ 289.00 L.F. $
$
$ 31.00 L.F. $
$ 42.00 L.F. $
$ 55.00 L.F. $
$ 62.00 L.F. $
$ 68.00 L.F. $
$ 84.00 L.F. $
$ 106.00 L.F. $
$ 124.00 L.F. $
$ 289.00 L.F. $
$
$
Cost
-
-
81,180.00
-
65,552.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sub Total Mainline: $ 146,732.00
$ 1,750.00 EA $ -
$ 2,000.00 EA $ -
$ 2,250.00 EA $ -
$ 2,500.00 EA $ -
$ 2,750.00 EA $ -
WATER
Item Description
HOT TAP CONT'D
METERS & SERVICE LINES
3/4" Water Meter with Service Line
3/4" Water Meter without Service Line
1" Water Meter with Service Line
1" Water Meter without Service Line
1-1/2" Water Meter with Service Line
1-1/2" Water Meter without Service Line
2" Water Meter with Service Line
2" Water Meter without Service Line
3" Water Meter with strainer
4" Water Meter with strainer
6" Water Meter with strainer
8" Water Meter with strainer
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT NO: ESUB25-00004
LOCATION: SW corner of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
DATE: 1 0/31 /2025
BY: Allard Engineering
Quantity Unit Cost Unit
$
$
Sub Total Hot Tap: $
$ 1,830.00 EA $
$ 479.00 EA $
$ 2,031.00 EA $
$ 651.00 EA $
$ 2,951.00 EA $
$ 1,215.00 EA $
$ 3,234.00 EA $
$ 1,786.00 EA $
$ 2,386.00 EA $
$ 3,270.00 EA $
$ 5,045.00 EA $
$ 6,462.00 EA $
$
$
$
Sub Total Meters & Service Lines: $
Cost
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
STREETS
Item Description
PAVEMENT
3" Asphalt Concrete
3.5" Asphalt Concrete
4" Asphalt Concrete
5" Asphalt Concrete
5.5" Asphalt Concrete
6" Asphalt Concrete
7" Asphalt Concrete
8" Asohalt Concrete
Crushed Aaareqate Base
Crushed Aaareqate Base
Crushed Aaaregate Base
Crushed Aqqregate Base
Crushed Aaareqate Base
Crushed Aaareqate Base
Crushed Aaaregate Base
Asphalt Concrete &/or P.C.C. Removal
A.C. Curb
A.C. Repair
Slury Seal, Type I
Slurry Seal, Type II
Remove AC Pavement
Preparation of Subqrade
Under Sidewalk Drain
CURB & GUTTER
6" Curg & Gutter,
per Citv Standard S-09
8" Curb & Gutter,
per City Standard S-09
Cross Gutter oer Citv Standard S-05
Cross Gutter with Spandrels
P.C.C. Alley Gutter
P.C. CONCRETE
4" Thick Residential Sidewalk (6' wide)
4" Thick Commercial Sidewalk (10' wide)
6" Thick Residential Drive Approach,
per City Standard S-02 ( 12' wide)
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT NO: ESUB25-00004 ---------------------
LO CAT 1O N: SW corner of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
DATE: 10/31/2025
BY: Allard Engineering
Quantitv Unit Cost Unit
$1.31 S.F. $
$1.53 S.F. $
72 760 $1.75 S.F. $
$2.19 S.F. $
$2.41 S.F. $
$2.63 S.F. $
$3.06 S.F. $
$3.50 S.F. $
1,805 $30.00 CY $
$0.21 CY $
$0.21 CY $
$0.21 CY $
$0.21 CY $
$0.21 CY $
$0.21 CY $
$60.00 C.Y $
$15.00 L.F. $
$200.00 C.Y. $
$0.50 S.F. $
$0.75 S.F. $
2,118 $0.75 L.F. $
76,760 $0.25 S.F. $
2 $1,500.00 EA $
$
Sub Total Pavement: $
$20.00 L.F. $
1,900 $25.00 L.F. $
2,180 $5.50 S.F. $
$8.74 S.F. $
$10.25 L.F. $
$
$
$
$
Sub Total Curb & Gutter: $
11,400 $7.50 S.F. $
$7.50 S.F. $
$6.13 S.F. $
Cost
-
-
127 330.00
-
-
-
-
-
54,150.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,588.50
19,190.00
3,000.00
-
205,258.50
-
47,500.00
11,990.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
59,490.00
85,500.00
-
-
II
WATER
Item Description
VALVES
4" Gate Valve
6" Gate Valve
8" Gate Valve
12" Gate Valve
12" Butterfly Valve
16" Butterfly Valve
18" Butterfly Valve
20" Butterfly Valve
1" Air Vacuum Valve
2" Air Vacuum Valve
BACKFLOWS
3/4" Reduced Pressure Backflow Device
1" Reduced Pressure Backflow Device
1-1/2" Reduced Pressure Backflow Device
2" Reduced Pressure Backflow Device
3" Reduced Pressure Backflow Device
4" Reduced Pressure Backflow Device
6" Reduced Pressure Backflow Device
8" Reduced Pressure Backflow Device
Backlow Test (RP)
FIRE SERVICE
RPDCA, Reduced Pressure Bacflow Device for Fire
Services
Standard Fire Hydrant, High-Pressure Dry Barrel
w/Traffic Break Away, Mueller or American Flow
Control, Model Super Centurion, American Darling or
Waterous
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT NO: ESUB25-00004
LOCATION: SW corner of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
DATE: 1 0/31 /2025
BY: Allard Engineering
Quantity Unit Cost Unit
$ 700.00 EA $
$ 1,000.00 EA $
$ 1,350.00 EA $
$ 2,200.00 EA $
$
$ 2,200.00 EA $
$ 4,500.00 EA $
$ 6,800.00 EA $
$ 8,000.00 EA $
$
$ 3,000.00 EA $
$ 5,000.00 EA $
$
$
Sub Total Valves: $
$ 1,700.00 EA $
$ 2,000.00 EA $
$ 2,800.00 EA $
$ 3,500.00 EA $
EA $
EA $
EA $
EA $
$
$
$ 65.00 EA $
$
$
Sub Total Backflows: $
0 $ 25,000.00 EA $
$ 4,750.00 EA $
$
Cost
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
WATER
Item Description
FIRE SERVICE (cont'd)
MISCELLANEOUS
Water Sampler Station
Thrust Block
Remove Thrust Block
Adjust water valve can to grade
Trench Repair
Pump Station
Disinfection Facilities (CL & NH 3 System)
Regulating Facilities
Water Storage Tank
Blow Off
T raffle Control
ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT NO: ESUB25-00004
LOCATION: SW corner of Cahuenga Rd & Seneca Rd
DATE: 1 0/31 /2025
BY: Allard Engineering
Quantity Unit Cost Unit
$
$
Sub Total Fire Service: $
$ 500.00 EA $
$ 350.00 EA $
$ 200.00 EA $
$ 300.00 EA $
$ 3.50 S.F. $
$ 1,100.00 GPM $
$ 500,000.00 EA $
$ 250,000.00 EA $
$ 1.25 GAL. $
$ 5,000.00 EA $
LS. $
$
$
$
Sub Total Miscellaneous: $
Sub-Total Water: $
10% Contingency:! $
TOTAL WATER COST:I $
Cost
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
146,732.00
14,673.201
161,405.20 I
PLAN & PERMIT FEE CALCULATION FORMULA $ 6,956.21
$0-$50,000 is 5% of Cost Est. $ 2,500.00
$50,001-$250,000 is 4% of Cost Est. $ 4,456.21
$250,001 + is 3% of Cost Est. $ -
Item Number: 8
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Subject:
Minutes of the January 20 and February 3, 2026, Regular City Council Meetings Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the minutes of the Regular City Council Meetings held on January 20 and February 3, 2026.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.
Prepared By:
Denise A. Salazar, Deputy City Clerk
Attachments: A. Minutes of the January 20, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting B. Minutes of the February 3, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting Attachment A
Minutes of the January 20,
2026, Regular City Council
Meeting
City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR
JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, January 20, 2026
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Present: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
Absent: None
Also Present:
City Manager Keith C. Metzler, Deputy City Manager Jenele Davidson, Deputy City Manager Scott Webb, Deputy City
Manager Tony Camargo, City Attorney Andre de
Bortnowsky, City Clerk Jennifer Thompson
Invocation: Pastor Paul Gostanian with High Desert Church
Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain Jerry Davenport
Proclamations/Special Presentations
Public Entity Risk Management Authority Excellence in Risk Management Award presented by Beth Lions with PERMA
Presentation of New Hires and Promotions to City Council by Human Resources Officer Heather Barber
Presentation by City Manager to City Council – 2025 Year in Review
Questions and comments ensued
City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda
City Clerk Thompson announced one (1) revision.
Revision to item 4:
Revised Exhibit A to Resolution No. 26-002 due to agenda management software platform improperly converting document and altering formatting
Conflict of Interest Declarations
There were no conflicts of interest reported.
Introduction to Public Comments
City Clerk Thompson provided an opening statement regarding public comments.
Public Comments
The following people spoke:
Quenese Walker spoke on general items
Mary Anne State spoke on general items
City Clerk Thompson announced that one (1) public comment was received via email, distributed to the City Council, and posted on the City’s website.
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. An Amendment to the Victorville Municipal Code (“VMC”) with an environmental exemption, making various changes to Article 12, Chapter 7 of Title 16 to adopt changes necessary to comply with regulations resulting from the State of California's passage of Se nate Bill 635 relating to the protection of personally identifiable information provided by sidewalk vendors
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Open and conduct a Public Hearing to receive public testimony; (2) Close the Public Hearing;
(3) Find the VMC Amendment exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Guideline sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3);
(4) Introduce Ordinance No. 2463 for adoption and first reading by title only; and (5) Waive further reading in full of proposed Ordinance No. 2463.
The Chair opened the Public Hearing
There were no speakers
The Chair closed the Public Hearing
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations for points 3 through 5
Moved: Council Member Irving
Seconded: Council Member Gaudin
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
2. An Amendment to Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code with an Environmental Exemption introducing residential development requirements on Mixed-Use zoned parcels identified in the City’s Housing Element as Regional Housing Needs Allocation shortfall sites and to correct typographical errors, including mislabeling of Mixed-Use zone districts
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Open and conduct a Public Hearing to receive public testimony; (2) Close the Public Hearing;
(3) Find the Victorville Municipal Code Amendment categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); (4) Introduce Ordinance No. 2462 for adoption and first reading by title only to amend the Victorville Municipal Code; and
(5) Waive a further reading in full of proposed Ordinance No. 2462.
Questions ensued
The Chair opened the Public Hearing
There were no speakers
The Chair closed the Public Hearing
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations for points 3 through 5
Moved: Mayor Pro Tem Harriman
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Minutes of the December 2 and December 16, 2025, Regular City Council Meetings and the January 08, 2026, Special City Council Meeting
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the minutes of the Regular City Council Meetings held on December 2 and December 16, 2025, and the Special City Council Meeting held on January 08, 2026.
4. Annual AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-002 approving the annual AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.
5. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 12
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 12 for the period of November 26, 2025, through December 10, 2025, in total amount of $5,271,417.25. This total includes:
Electronic Fund Transfers No. 347110 through 347234 and Warrant No. 802081 through 802230 in the amount of $5,271,417.25.
All are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
6. Payroll Demand Schedule No. 4A
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 4A for the payroll period of September 26, 2025, through October 10, 2025, in total amount of $2,450,613.87. This total includes:
Employee Check Nos. 34707 and 34709 through 34714 and 34722 in the amount of $6,415.85.
Vendor Check Nos. 34715 through 34721 in the amount of $3,568.71.
Advice Nos. 334626 through 335213 in the amount of $1,592,293.27; and Vendor Electronic Payments totaling $848,336.04.
All expenditures are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025– 2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
7. CalRecycle Used Oil Payment Program Grant Cycle OPP 16 Acceptance and Budget Amendment
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council adopt Resolution No. 26- 004 authorizing acceptance of the CalRecycle Used Oil Payment Program (OPP) Cycle 16 Grant and amending the City of Victorville FY 2025-26 budget.
8. Economic Development Newsletter – FY25-26 Q1 & Q2
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file the attached Economic Development Quarterly Newsletter.
9. Notice of Completion for Building 701 Demolition, Project #CC25-134
Recommendation:
That the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Board of Directors:
(1) Approve the Notice of Completion for Building 701 Demolition, Project #CC25- 134; and
(2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the Notice of Completion.
10. Reduction of the Faithful Performance Securities associated with a Single -Family Residential Home located at 12310 Beaver Avenue
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve the 80- percent release of the Water Faithful Performance Security; and
(2) Accept the completed water public improvements.
11. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 14933
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve an 80-percent release of Street Faithful Performance Security for Tract Map No. 14933; and
(2) Accept the completed street public improvements.
12. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 16677
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve an 80- percent release of Water and Drainage Faithful Performance Securities associated with Tract Map No. 16677; and
(2) Accept the completed Water and Drainage public improvements.
13. Engineering Report for the Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2026
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file this quarterly report.
14. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 13
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 13 for the period of December 11, 2025, through December 24, 2025, in total amount of $3,352,096.59. This total includes:
Electronic Fund Transfers No. 347235 through 347423 and Warrant No. 802231 through 802406 in the amount of $3,352,096.59.
All are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
15. Consideration of Resolution No. 26-006, Accepting the Unanimous Approval of the Property Owner and Annexing the Pollo Campero Development into Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Annexation No. 3)
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Adopt Resolution No. 26- 006, to accept the unanimous approval of the landowners and make the findings necessary to annex Parcel No. 3093- 182-09- 0000 into Community Facilities District No. 2024- 01 of the City of Victorville (Municipal Services); and
(2) To order the levy of Special Taxes to pay for municipal services and maintenance of certain facilities associated with the Pollo Campero Development (Annexation No. 3).
16. Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Activity Report
Recommendation:
That the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Board (“SCLAA”) review and file the attached Southern California Logistics Airport Activity Report.
Comments ensued for items 8 and 13
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations for Consent Calendar items 3 through 16
Moved: Council Member Irving
Seconded: Council Member Gaudin
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
17. Annual Financial Reports for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council and Board of Directors approve a motion to receive and file the following:
(1) City of Victorville Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2025;
(2) Victorville Water District Basic Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2025; and
(3) Southern California Logistics Airport Authority Basic Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2025.
Presentation provided by Ahmed Badawi, President with Badawi & Associates
Questions ensued
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations
Moved: Council Member Gaudin
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Comments ensued
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
18. Cooperative Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the Ridgecrest Road at Bluff Crest Street and Vista Point Drive Traffic Signal Project
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve entry into a Cooperative Agreement with the County of San Bernardino to jointly participate in a project installing offset traffic signals at the Ridgecrest Road intersections with Bluff Crest Street and Vista Point Drive; and (2) Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to make non-substantive changes and clarifications to the Cooperative Agreement.
Questions ensued
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations
Moved: Mayor Becerra
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Comments ensued
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
19. Award of Construction Contract to Veterans Communication Services, Inc. for City- Wide Security Camera Installation – Phase 1, Project CC26-063
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the award and execution of a construction contract to Veterans Communication Services, Inc., of Chino, California, in the amount of $217,794.50 for the City-Wide Security Camera Installation – Phase 1, Project CC26-063.
Questions ensued
Motion was made to approve staff recommendation
Moved: Council Member Gaudin
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Harriman
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
20. Ratification of Change Order No. 1 – Hook Community Center Flooring Installation, Project CC26-061
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Ratify the City Manager’s approval of Change Order No. 1 to the construction agreement with Lawrence W. Rosine Co. for the Hook Community Center Flooring Installation, Project CC26-061, in the amount of $36,217.74; and (2) Approve the revised total contract amount of $76,917.74.
Questions ensued
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations
Moved: Mayor Becerra
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Comments ensued
Motion passed 4-1
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Becerra
Noes: Mayor Pro Tem Harriman
21. Public Safety Plan Update
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file the attached Public Safety Plan Update.
Questions ensued
Motion was made to approve staff recommendation
Moved: Council Member Gaudin
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Comments ensued
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
22. Possible cancellation of the Regular City Council Meeting of March 17, 2026
Recommendation:
Any action is at the discretion of the City Council.
Motion was made to cancel the March 17, 2026, regular City Council Meeting
Moved: Council Member Gaudin
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
23. Discussion and Possible Action for Consideration of Establishing a City-Sponsored 5K Race Event
Recommendation:
Any action is at the discretion of Your Honorable City Council.
Questions ensued
Motion was made to provide City Manager and staff permission to investiga te feasibility of a 5k race event.
Moved: Mayor Pro Tem Harriman
Seconded: Mayor Becerra
Comments ensued
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
24. City Manager Reports
City Manager Keith C. Metzler announced the Animal Services special adoption event “Be My Palentine” taking place at the Animal Care and Adoption Center on January 31, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Code Enforcement will be conducting the 2026 Point -in-Time Count on January
22. The City of Victorville will facilitate this one- day survey of sheltered and unsheltered individuals to assess local homeless population and their characteristics. These results are vital for the city, state and the federal agency to secure funding, guide policy and to develop strategies to address homelessness.
The City of Victorville received no cost technical assistance from SBCTA, SBCOG and SCAG to create multifamily objective design standards. These standards will align the city zoning ordinance with state law and the general plans housing element. Following a robust public outreach campaign, t hese guidelines a im to streamline housing production at no cost to the city.
25. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Upcoming Agenda Items
None
26. Reports from Council Members
Council Member Mora stated how impressed she was with the city staff , staff reports, and expressed her appreciation for the transparency, thoughtfulness and dedication to detail. She stated she looks forward to working together this year.
Council Member Irving stated she had the opportunity to attend the MLK Peace March, it was a lovely event . She commended Mayor Becerra for her great leadership and her skill in acknowledgement and recognition to inspire others.
Mayor Pro Tem Harriman stated he attended the MLK concert in which he recognized the band and thanked staff for organizing a good event.
Mayor Becerra thanked her fellow council members for their involvement within the community. She gave recognition to the reports from SCLA , Economic Development and Engineering th at show the public the current state of the City and the direction it is headed. Mayor Becerra also thanked Mr. Robinson and his staff for their work during the holidays and through the stormy weather. She expressed her appreciation to the staff for ensuring public safety.
Adjournment
Mayor Becerra adjourned the meeting at 8:24 p.m.
Attest:
_____________________ _________________________ Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Attachment B
Minutes of the February 3,
2026, Regular City Council
Meeting
City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR
JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, February 3, 2026
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order
Mayor Becerra called the meeting to order in honor of Sergeant Grant Ward, San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, President of SEBA, who passed away this week.
Roll Call
Present: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
Absent: None
Also Present: City Manager Keith C. Metzler, Deputy City Manager Jenele Davidson, Deputy City Manager Scott Webb, Deputy City
Manager Tony Camargo, City Attorney Andre de
Bortnowsky, City Clerk Jennifer Thompson
Invocation: Pastor Josh Gerbracht with First Assembly of God Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain Jerry Davenport
City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda
Agenda presented with no revisions reported.
Conflict of Interest Declarations
There were no conflicts of interest reported.
Introduction to Public Comments
City Clerk Thompson provided an opening statement regarding public comments.
Public Comments
The following people spoke:
Jasmine Valentine spoke on general items
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. Mid-Year Budget Review and Amendment Request to the Fiscal Year 2025 -2026 Revised Fiscal Budget
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council and Board of Directors approve the changes reflected in this agenda item along with the included attachments by adopting:
(1) Resolution No. 26- 001 of the City Council of the City of Victorville amending Resolution 25-040, as amended, the budget resolution for the City of Victorville for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, relating to an appropriation of funds; (2) Resolution No. VWD -26-001 of the Board of Directors of the Victorville Water District amending Resolution VWD-25-008, as amended, the budget resolution for the Victorville Water District for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026, relating to an appropriation of funds;
(3) Resolution No. SCLAA -26-001 of the Board of Directors of the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority amending Resolution SCLAA -25-010, as amended, the budget resolution for the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, relating to an appropriation of funds; (4) Resolution No. CHAS 26- 001 of the City Council of the City of Victor ville as the Housing Asset Successor to the Victorville Redevelopment Agency amending Resolution CHAS 25- 002, as amended, the budget resolution for the City as the Housing Asset Successor for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026, relating to an appropriation of funds;
(5) Resolution No. LBT 26 -001 of the Library Board of Trustees amending Resolution No. LBT 25 -002, as amended, the budget resolution for the Victorville Library for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, relating to an appropriation of funds; and (6) Resolution No. 26- 007 of the City Council of the City of Victorville amending, the budget resolution for the City of Victorville for Fiscal Year 2025 -2026, relating to an appropriation of funds for Grant AB3229.
Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation by Carmen Cun, Director of Finance
Questions ensued
The Chair opened the Public Hearing
There were no speakers
The Chair closed the Public Hearing
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations
Moved: Mayor Becerra
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Comments ensued
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 14
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 14 for the period of December 25, 2025, through January 07, 2026, in total amount of $6,200,880.69. This total includes:
• Electronic Fund Transfers No. 347424 through 347501 and Warrant No. 802407 through 802510 in the amount of $6,200,880.69.
All are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
3. Notice of Completion - Block Walls and Gates for Well Sites 137, 203, 207, and Stoddard Wells Pump Station District Project
Recommendation:
That the Honorable Victorville Water District Board of Directors:
(1) Approve the Notice of Completion for Block Walls and Gates for Well Sites 137, 203, 207, and Stoddard Wells Pump Station District Project; and (2) Authorize the General Manager to execute the Notice of Completion.
4. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 17516
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the full release of the Sewer Improvement Faithful Performance Security for Tract Map No. 17516.
5. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2462
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt, by second reading, Ordinance No. 2462, approving an amendment to Title 16 of the Victorville Municipal Code with an Environmental Exemption introducing residential development requirements on Mixed- Use zoned parcels identified in the City’s Housing Element as Regional Housing Needs Allocation shortfall sites and to correct typographical errors, including mislabeling of Mixed-Use zone districts.
6. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2463
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt, by second reading, Ordinance No. 2463, approving an amendment to the Victorville Municipal Code (“VMC”) with an environmental exemption, making various changes to Article 12, Chapter 7 of Title 16 to adopt changes necessary to comply with regulations resulting from the State of California's passage of Senate Bill 635 relating to the protection of personally identifiable information provided by sidewalk vendors.
7. 2025 Planning Commission Approved Projects List
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file the attached 2025 Planning Commission Approved Projects List.
8. Notice of Completion – City Hall Reception and Security Expansion Project, Project JM25-080
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Accept as complete and approve the Notice of Completion for the City Hall Reception and Security Expansion Project, Project JM25-080; and (2) Authorize the City Manager to execute and file the Notice of Completion.
9. Payroll Demand Schedule No. 4B
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 4B for the payroll period of October 10, 2025, through October 24, 2025, in total amount of $2,407,416.57. This total includes:
• Employee Check Nos. 34708 and 34723 through 34724 and 34729 in the amount of $6,072.77.
• Vendor Check Nos. 34725 through 34728 in the amount of $3,250.87. • Advice Nos. 335214 through 335798 in the amount of $1,633,319.00; and Vendor Electronic Payments totaling $764,773.93.
All expenditures are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025– 2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
10. Code Compliance Department second quarter activity reports for Fiscal Year 25/26
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file.
Motion was made to approve staff recommendation s for Consent Calendar items 2 through 10
Moved: Council Member Irving
Seconded: Council Member Gaudin
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
11. Benefits Resolution No. 26-008 and the Salary Schedule
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council adopt Benefits Resolution No. 26-008, amending the Salary Schedule and amending Fringe Benefits, effective February 3, 2026.
Motion was made to approve staff recommendation
Moved: Council Member Gaudin
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
12. Agreement for Reimplementation of Utility Payment Kiosks and Three -Year Maintenance & Support Services
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve a three- year SaaS and Services Agreement with CityBase, Inc., for the repair and reimplementation of the City’s utility payment kiosks and associated SaaS maintenance and support services, in an amount not to exceed $171,240.00;
(2) Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to make agreed- upon, non- substantive changes to the Agreement, if needed; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations
Moved: Council Member Gaudin
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Harriman
Comments ensued
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
13. Southern California Edison Easement on Sea Venture Place
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Grant an exclusive utility easement to Southern California Edison on Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 3133-341-67 as described in the attached documents; and (2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the easement on the City's behalf.
Motion was made to approve staff recommendations
Moved: Council Member Gaudin
Seconded: Council Member Mora
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
14. Award of Construction Contract – City Hall Second Floor Carpet Replacement, Project CC26-060
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council award the construction contract for the City Hall Second Floor Carpet Replacement, Project CC26- 060, to Perfection Painting Corporation, as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, in the amount of $178,500.00.
Questions ensued
Motion was made to approve staff recommendation
Moved: Council Member Irving
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Harriman
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
15. Appointment to the vacant seat on the Victorville Planning Commission
Recommendation:
That Your Honorable City Council consider appointing Arsalee Morales to the Victorville Planning Commission as recommended by Mayor Becerra.
Questions ensued
Motion was made to appoint Arsalee Morales to the Planning Commission
Moved: Mayor Becerra
Seconded: Mayor Pro Tem Harriman
Comments ensued
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
16. City Manager Reports
City Manager Keith C. Metzler announced plans for the Target store proposed for the intersection of Roy Rogers Drive and Amargosa Road have been submitted and are currently in the first review phase . It is scheduled to open mid to late calendar year 2027.
Community Services will be hosting a Community Open House and Grand Opening Celebration for the new Victorville City Library on Green Tree Blvd., Saturday, February 7 th, 10:00 a.m. to 1 :30 p.m. Join the celebration for tours, refreshments and giveaways.
Environmental Program s next S hred-Fest and compost giveaway will be Saturday, February 7 th, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Materials Re cycling Facility. Residents can bring up to four, 20 p ound bags of paper documents to be shredded for free. They are also able to receive up to 50 gallons of free compost per household. For more information contact the Environmental Programs Division.
17. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Upcoming Agenda Items
Motion was made to direct staff to consider the possibility of naming the Victorville Library, The James L. Cox Library, after former Council Member and City Manager James L. Cox
Moved: Mayor Becerra
Seconded: Council Member Irving
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Council Member Gaudin, Council Member Irving, Council Member Mora, Mayor Pro Tem Harriman, Mayor Becerra
18. Reports from Council Members
Council Member Gaudin reported she attended the Mayors and Council Members Academy in Sacramento and found it to be a valuable asset to gain new tools and ideas. She expressed appreciation for the opportunity to attend.
Council Member Mora stated she also enjoyed the Leagu e of California Cities New Councilmember training, noting that it was beneficial to be updated on legislation, polic ies and procedures. She reported attending the VVWRA board meeting where she learned about the compl exities of water rights . She also participated in a ride along with Victorville Fire Station 312 . She expressed her gratitude to Captain Matthews and all public servants and appreciated the ability to see it first-hand.
Mayor Pro Tem Harriman reported he was also able to join the Fire Department on a ride along, in the former housing area of the airport , during which Deputy Chief Roach explained the training in detail . Mayor Pro Tem H arriman reported he attended the League of Cal ifornia Cities event in Sacramento, where he serves as the Public Safety Policy Committee Member for the High Desert region.
He expressed pride in holding the position and representing the High Desert area.
Mayor Becerra announced she also attended the Leagu e of California Cities meeting in Sacramento. While there, she participated as a member of the Transportation Committee, where they reviewed the bylaws. She noted i t was good training, and she looks forward to attending again.
Adjournment
Mayor Becerra adjourned the meeting in honor of Sergeant Ward at 7:16 p.m.
Attest:
_____________________ _________________________ Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Item Number: 9
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 17, 2026
Submitted By:
Joe Slegers, Building Official
Subject:
Building Department Fiscal Year-to-Date Report
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file.
Fiscal Impact:
There are no fiscal impacts associated with this item.
Strategic Plan Goal:
The City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026 identifies multi-year strategic goals and various strategies to work towards achieving those goals. Goal A, Financial Sustainability focuses on fostering fiscal health through disciplined long-term planning, cost control, increased revenues, and cost recovery. Specific to this item, Strategy 3 focuses on maintaining adequate reserves in the general fund in order to protect against fluctuations in the economy, unexpected expenses and to meet or exceed the Government Finance Officers Association recommended standard. The data in this report can assist the Council in monitoring development activity for fluctuations due to economic conditions and other factors.
Background:
Staff has compiled the attached report summarizing Building Department activities and data for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 to date (July 1 through December 31, 2025).
Discussion:
The attached Building Department report provides information on permit and licensing activity and related revenue for single family residences, new commercial, and industrial business and construction, and miscellaneous permits and licenses issued by the Building Department, Business License Division and Fire Prevention Division during the first 2 quarters of Fiscal Year 2025-2026.
4 5
3 9
Prepared By:
Jaimie Lester, Building Manager
Attachments: A. Building Department Fiscal Year-to-Date Report
Attachment A
Building Department
Fiscal Year-to-Date
Report
Page
BUILDINGDEPARTMENTFISCALYEAR-TO-DATEREPORT
FIRE PREVENTION | BUSINESS LICENSE | BUILDING
July 1, 2025 - December 31, 2025
Table of Contents
4 A c c o m p l i s h m e n t s
5 - 6
B u i l d i n g P e r m i t A n a l y s i s
7 B u i l d i n g I n s p e c t i o n s & S t o p s
8 B u i l d i n g P e r m i t T o t a l s & R e v e n u e 9-11
B u s i n e s s L i c e n s e T o t a l s & R e v e n u e 1 2
F i r e P r e v e n t i o n A c t i v i t y A n a l y s i s FIRE PREVENTION | BUSINESS LICENSE | BUILDING
A W o r d f r o m o u r B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l / S t a f f H i g h l i g h t 3 B u s i n e s s L i c e n s e A n a l y s i s
1 3 - 1 4
B u i l d i n g D e p a r t m e n t H i s t o r i c a l D a t a 1 5 - 1 7
B u s i n e s s L i c e n s e H i s t o r i c a l D a t a 18 Staff Highlight
In 2025, Building Department permits and revenue declinedin several categories, largely due to market conditions.Despite this, multiple commercial and industrial projects havealready been entitled and submitted for plan review at thebeginning of the year. This should position the Departmentfor increased activity and revenue moving forward.
The Business License Division performed strongly, with asignificant increase in new business licenses and steadyrevenue from business license renewals.
The Fire Prevention Division has remained steady andanticipates an increase in commercial and industrial projectsin early 2026.
Overall, while 2025 reflected softer revenue in some areas,the outlook for the coming year remains positive with strongdevelopment activity already in the pipeline.
A Word From OurBuilding Official
Stephanie Landa
Fire Inspector | Fire Prevention
S t e p h a n i e b e g a n h e r c a r e e r w i t h t h e C i t y o f V i c t o r v i l l e i n 2 0 2 3 w i t h t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t a n d l a t e r j o i n e d t h e B u i l d i n g D e p a r t m e n t a s a P e r m i t T e c h n i c i a n w i t h i n t h e F i r e P r e v e n t i o n d i v i s i o n .
S t e p h a n i e w a s p r o m o t e d t o F i r e I n s p e c t o r , w h e r e s h e c o n t i n u e s t o s u p p o r t t h e C i t y ’ s m i s s i o n b y e n s u r i n g s a f e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d c o d e c o m p l i a n c e t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o m m u n i t y .
C o n g r a t u l a t i o n s , S t e p h a n i e !
FIRE PREVENTION | BUSINESS LICENSE | BUILDING