Cities Index.
County Center Rehab - Bicycle Enhancement Presentation

Visalia City Council
November 7, 2022

Document
County Center Rehab - Bicycle Enhancement Presentation
Meeting
November 7, 2022
Body
Visalia City Council
Original file
3.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on visalia.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
REHABILITATION PROJECT – BICYCLE

LANE ENHANCEMENT & PROTECTED

INTERSECTIONS
November 7th, 2022

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
• Bicycle Lane Enhancement as part of County Center Dr Rehabilitation Project
• - Project Background
• - Existing project conditions and configuration
• - Bike Lane Enhancement Proposal
• - Protected Intersection Overview
• - Parking Analysis
• - Summary
• - Next Steps
• - Questions
2 PROJECT BACKGROUND
• Bike Lane Classifications
• - Class I – Bike trail (often a multi-use path)
separated from motorized roadway
• - Class II – Striped Bike lane adjacent vehicle lane
• - Class III – Signage or roadway markings indicating
the road to be shared by vehicles and bikes
• - Class IV – Protected and/or separated bike lane
adjacent to motorized roadway
3 PROJECT BACKGROUND
• County Center Dr Pavement Rehabilitation
Project – Houston Ave to Riggin Ave
• - Measure N Funding ($2.2M)
• - Construction Slated for January 2023
• - Pavement Rehabilitation Project
• - Drainage Improvements
• - ADA Ramp Construction
• - Restriping of the Street
County Center St North of Oriole Ave – Looking North
4 STANDARD DESIGN & EXISTING CONDITION
• County Center Dr is classified as a 2-lane Collector
Roadway
• - Standard Collector Roadway Design:
• - 2-lane roadway, center left turn lane
• curb & gutter, & sidewalk
• 2-Lane Collector Engineering Standard
• County Center Dr – Existing Condition
5 STANDARD DESIGN & EXISTING CONDITION
• -Various destinations surround this
section of County Center Dr.
• Destinations surrounding County Center Dr.

County Center Dr Connectivity
6 STANDARD DESIGN & EXISTING CONDITION
• - Standard intersection design do not
typically continue bike lanes through the
intersection.
• - Bike lanes often end ahead of intersections
drop off or merge with right turn lanes
requiring people on bikes to mix with
vehicles
• County Center Dr at Ferguson Avenue Intersection – Existing Condition
Existing County Center Dr at Ferguson Ave Intersection Design 7 PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITY
• County Center Dr is an excellent corridor for a Class IV bike route • Existing County Center Dr Configuration • Proposed Bike Lane 8 PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITY
• Advantages:
• - Encourage an active and healthy community
• - Through safety improvements, increase ridership
• - Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT).
• Proposed Bike Facility For County Center St• Class IV bike route on Walnut Ave 9 PROPOSED PROTECTED INTERSECTION - SAFETY
• Better Bike networks need
Safer Intersections
• - Intersections are the place
where the most vehicle-bike
conflicts occur. 2017, 43% of
urban bicyclist fatalities
occurred at intersections.
• NACTO analysis of NHTSA FARS data: Non-freeway
Urban Bike Fatalities (US 2017)
10 PROPOSED PROTECTED INTERSECTION - HISTORY
- American Engineers have been aware
of protected intersection design since
1972.
-As of today, there are at least twenty
(20) constructed protected intersections
in California alone.
-With many more throughout the
country.
11 Alabama’s First Protected Intersection – Auburn University

CALIFORNIA SHIFT TO ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
California has been shifting towards multi-
modal transportation infrastructure.
- - Complete Street shift from vehicle movement
as primary goal to movement of people and
goods
- - Design of infrastructure for “all ages and
abilities” embodying national and international
best practices related to traffic calming.
12 PROTECTED INTERSECTION FUNCTIONALITY
13 PROPOSED PROTECTED INTERSECTION
• Advantages:
• - Improves visibility of
pedestrians and people on
bikes
• - Slows down conflict zones
• -A d d s S e p a r a t i o n a n d
protection for people on
Bikes through the
intersection
• Proposed Protected Intersection at County Center Dr and Ferguson Ave 14 N
PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITY – PARKING IMPACT
• Disadvantages
• - Removal of on-street parking
• A Parking Study was conducted for two weeks.
• Total Parking Stalls Approximately Available within Project Limits: 433 • Max Street Parking Utilized: 3%
• Parking Survey Date Parking Study Time Number of Cars Parked Wednesday (8/17/2022) 7:30 AM / 6:00 PM 10 / 6
Thursday (8/18/2022) 7:30 AM / 6:30 PM
10 / 11
Friday (8/19/2022) 7:20 AM / 6:30 PM 8 / 10
Tuesday (8/23/2022) 7:20 AM / 6:30 PM 7 / 9
Wednesday (8/24/2022) 7:30 AM / 6:30 PM 8 / 7
Thursday (8/25/2022) 7:20 AM / 6:20 PM 9 / 9
Saturday (8/27/2022) 10:00 AM 7
15 PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITY – PARKING IMPACT
• Highest observed parking Day
16 PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITY – PARKING IMPACT
‐ The majority of parked cars were
seen fronting the Town homes,
averaging 6 to 8 parked cars.
• Ample on street parking on Lark Ave, and other adjacent Local Streets
• On street parking along County Center Dr
17 PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITY – PARKING IMPACT
‐ Field observations indicate local on street parking and onsite parking is sufficient to handle the displacement of the observed parking along County Center Dr .
• Onsite Parking – 6 Available stalls
• Onsite Parking – 6 Available stalls
• Local on Street Parking (Lark Ave)
Approximately 7 Available spaces
18 SUMMARY
Advantages:
‐ Cost savings to the project, stretching
the project funds
‐ Improvement to traffic safety along
the corridor for all modes
Disadvantages:
‐ Loss of some on street parking
• Class IV along Walnut Ave
19 NEXT STEPS
If accepted, proceed with a Public Survey for the local community to garner community feedback on proposal.
‐ ‐ If feedback is positive proceed with proposal
‐ ‐ If feedback is negative return to Council for direction 20 QUESTIONS?
21

← All documents from this meeting