Visalia City Council
December 5, 2022

Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
Visalia City Council
City Council
Meeting Agenda - Final
Mayor Steve Nelsen
Vice Mayor Brian Poochigian
Council Member Greg Collins
Council Member Brett Taylor
Council Member Liz Wynn
City Council Chambers7:00 PMMonday, December 5, 2022

ROLL CALL
CALL TO ORDER WORK SESSION - 4:00 PM

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Citizens are now invited to comment on issues within the jurisdiction of the Visalia City Council. The Council asks that you keep your comments concise and positive. Creative criticism, presented with appropriate courtesy, is welcome.

Each speaker will be allowed three minutes and a timer will notify you when your time is expired. Please begin your comments by stating and spelling your name and providing your city of residence.

WORK SESSION AND ACTION ITEMS (as described)

1. NEW EMPLOYEE INTRODUCTION:

Transit: Robert Shane, Senior Building Maintenance Technician 22-0443

2. Presentation of, and direction regarding a series of options for the City Council’s consideration ahead of a future adoption of an Agricultural Preservation Ordinance to implement the City’s Agricultural Mitigation Program as outlined in General Plan Land Use Policy LU-P-34.
22-0435
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION - 6:00 PM (Or, immediately following Work Session)
CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INVOCATION

1 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final December 5, 2022

SPECIAL PRESENTATION / RECOGNITION

1. Ceremonial Swearing In - Nicholas Bartsch, Public Works Director 22-0447

2. Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to City of Visalia
22-0448

ITEMS OF INTEREST

PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters that are not on the agenda and within the jurisdiction of the Visalia City Council. The Council asks that you keep your comments brief and positive. Creative criticism, presented with appropriate courtesy, is welcome.

This is also the time for citizens to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes. Public comments related to all pulled Consent Calendar items and Regular or Public Hearing items listed on the agenda will be heard at the time that item is discussed or when the Public Hearing is opened.

Each speaker will be allowed three minutes, and a timer will notify you when your time is expired. Please begin your comments by stating and spelling your name and providing your city of residence.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

1. Authorization to read ordinances by title only. 22-0153

2. Approve the Citizens Advisory Committee’s recommendation to appoint Rebecca Donabed and Charles Garza to fill two vacant voting positions on the Citizens Advisory Committee.
22-0421

3. Authorize the City Manager to approve a contract amendment for Carollo Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $97,070 for the Update to the Stormwater Master Plan (Project Number
2450-72000/CP9067-999) and an additional appropriation of $100,000 from Storm Sewer Construction Fund 221.
22-0414

4. Authorize the City Manager to approve payment to California Water Service in the amount of $ 150,259.00 for the installation of five fire hydrants and two irrigation services as part of the Riggin Widening project between Mooney Blvd to Conyer St and appropriate an additional $ 85,000 in Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) funds (3010-72000/CIP0473-999).
22-0408

2 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final December 5, 2022

5. Authorize the City Manager to award the construction contract for RFB 22-23-19, Riggin Avenue Widening & Improvements (Akers to Demaree), to Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $4,059,548.45 and transfer $1.6M of Measure R Regional Funds (133) from other Riggin Avenue Widening projects as specified in this report.
22-0402

6. Authorize the City Manager to extend the contract with Denali Water Solutions for the removal and disposal of biosolids produced at the Visalia Water Reclamation Facility for a period of six (6) months for an amount not to exceed $220,000 and appropriate an additional $100,000 from the Wastewater Fund.
22-0430

7. Confirmation of the proposed Warming Center at 701 E Race per the Council approved funding requirements and confirmation of a lease through April 1, 2023 of this City owned property for a warming center at a rate of $1 per month upon approval of all appropriate planning and building requirements including the approval of a Temporary Conditional Use Permit through the Planning Commission and compliance with all building
requirements.
22-0446

8. Consideration and adoption of Resolution No. 2022-65 to amend the Official Speed Zone List of the City of Visalia and establish prima facie speed zones within the City limits at the 28 specified locations identified within the report.
22-0406

9. Request authorization to file a Notice of Completion for Greystone Phase 3 subdivision which contains 63 single-family residential lots located on northeast corner of North Akers Street and West Sedona Avenue.
22-0429

10. Request for City Council to receive, review, and file the 2021/22 Impact Fee Report as required by State Law.
22-0420

11. Request to Authorize the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Ave 288 Reconstruction & WWTP Onsite Improvements Project. (Project Number 4330-72000/CP0314-999 &
3010-72000/CP0319-999)
22-0413

12. Review and approval of the Citizens Advisory Committee’s recommendations for the 2023 Youth Non-Profit Grant Awards. 22-0423

13. Second reading of Ordinance Nos. 2022-14 and 2022-15 for the 2022 Building and Fire Code adoption.
22-0436

REGULAR ITEMS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS

3 City Council Meeting Agenda - Final December 5, 2022
Comments related to regular Items and Public Hearing Items are limited to three minutes per speaker, for a maximum of 30 minutes per item. The Mayor may reasonably limit or extend the public comment period to preserve the Council's interest in conducting efficient, orderly meetings.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT - None

ADJOURNMENT
UPCOMING COUNCIL MEETINGS:

Monday, December 19, 2022 at 7:00 p.m., 707 W. Acequia
Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 7:00 p.m., 707 W. Acequia
22-0449

4 Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0443 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 1.

Agenda Item Wording:

NEW EMPLOYEE INTRODUCTION:

Transit: Robert Shane, Senior Building Maintenance Technician Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
5 Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0435 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

Agenda Item Wording:

Presentation of, and direction regarding a series of options for the City Council’sconsideration ahead of a future adoption of an Agricultural Preservation Ordinance to implement the City’sAgricultural Mitigation Program as outlined in General Plan Land Use Policy LU-P-34.

Deadline for Action: 12/5/2022
Submitting Department: Community Development
Contact Name and Phone Number:

Paul Bernal, Community Development Director, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, (559)713-4025
Department Recommendation:

This work session item is being conducted to introduce and receive direction on several options prior to staff and the consultant preparing a draft Agricultural Preservation Ordinance for both City Council and public review. The options are briefly below summarized below and provided in the PowerPoint presentation.

Summary:

The City of Visalia has directed staff to implement an Agricultural Mitigation Program, as outlined in General Plan Policy LU-P-34. The Agricultural Mitigation Program would be implemented through adoption of an Agricultural Preservation Ordinance, which would direct how the program would be implemented by City staff. The adoption of the Agricultural Preservation Ordinance (APO) is a necessary step for projects in the Tier II and Tier III growth boundaries to move forward. While the policy language is prescriptive with relation to some of the program requirements, such as ensuring a 1:1 ratio of converted land to conserved land, there are still program parameters that require additional direction to ensure the Agricultural Preservation Ordinance meets the intent of the policy, including the potential to prepare a study to document the calculation of an in-lieu fee for the APO to serve as the basis for the City to adopt an in-lieu fee that can provide projects an alternative to securing and dedicating agricultural conservation easements on their own.

Purpose of Tonight’s Meeting:

As stated above, the purpose of the work session is for the staff and consultant to present the City Council with options and for the City Council to provide direction as to the preparation of the agricultural preservation program. Following the work session, the consultant will prepare an administrative draft of the ordinance for staff and public review.

In preparing options for the program for the City Council’sconsideration, the consultant took a three- part approach: analysis of General Plan policy LU-P-34, interviews with local governments and land trusts, and review of options for the program’sform and adoption. The attached power point and presentation to Council will highlight the details of this three-part approach.

In addition, the policy as defined in the general plan provides both narrow parameters and more Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 5
powered by Legistar™
6 File #: 22-0435 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

In addition, the policy as defined in the general plan provides both narrow parameters and more broad parameters for creation of the ordinance. These parameters are identified to guide the available options for the ordinance. Options that are provided in the presentation for City Council’s direction are briefly summarized below:

1. Confirm Farmland Designation of Property: Prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance are designated and mapped by the California Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP).

Option 1: Rely only on the most recent version of FMMP maps.

Option 2: Use the most recent version of the FMMP maps but allow for an individual site assessment process (by the applicant) to confirm FMMP designation.

Staff Recommendation: Option 2
This provides the applicant with the option to also do a site assessment to confirm the FMMP designation rather than only relying on FMMP data sets which are not updated and published frequently.

2. Exemption for Size of Project: The policy does not expressly call for an exemption based on the size of the project. However, such an exemption for small properties could be considered.

Option 1: No exemption based on the size of the project.

Option 2: Projects of one acre or less are exempt.

Option 3: Projects of five acres or less are exempt.

Staff Recommendation: Option 3
Projects of five acres or less should be exempt from the agricultural conservation easement policy. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) projects five acres or less can be exempt from any further CEQA review based on the Class 32 In-fill exemption. Staff’s recommendation to include a five-acre exemption would be in conformance with this threshold.

3. Exemption for Affordable Housing Projects: The policy specifically exempts certain uses (e.g., agricultural processing, agricultural buffers, and public facilities). The city may consider a specific exemption for affordable housing.

Option 1: No exemption for affordable housing projects.

Option 2: Exemption for certain affordable housing projects.

Option 3: Exemption for all affordable housing projects.

Staff Recommendation: Option 3
Staff’srecommendation to exempt all affordable housing projects is in conformance with the States housing mandates to limit and reduce barriers to affordable housing developments.

4. Exemption for Portion of the Project: The policy includes exemptions for certain uses as noted above but does not address the scope of the exemptions for such uses when a part of a larger project.

Option 1: For the exemption to apply, the exempted use must be the whole of the project.

Option 2: The exemption applies to the area of the exempted use.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 5
powered by Legistar™
7 File #: 22-0435 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

Staff Recommendation: Option 2
Staff recommends that Option 2 be applied for all projects subject to the Agricultural Preservation Ordinance. This would establish mitigation on the acreage to be developed with the proposed use but would not encumber projects that include dedicated acreage towards useable open space.

5. Location of Easements: Policy states Southern San Joaquin Valley but does provide a specific set of counties that make up this geographical area.

Option 1: Counties of Tulare and Kern.

Option 2: Counties of Tulare, Kern, and Kings.

Option 3: Counties of Tulare, Kern, Kings, Fresno, and Madera.

Staff Recommendation: Option 3
Staff recommends Option 3 as is provides a larger area for actual acquisition of an easement. In addition, the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center, which is part of the California Historical Resources Information System and located at California State University, Bakersfield, defines these five counties as the Southern San Joaquin Valley.

6. Qualifying Criteria: Adequate Water Supply: The policy requires that the farmland preserved demonstrate adequate water supply. There are different methods of demonstrating adequate water supply.

Option 1: Use the FMMP mapping designation as a proxy for demonstrating adequate water supply.

Option 2: In addition to referencing the FMMP mapping designation, verify that the property has at least one source of water.

Staff Recommendation: Option 2
Based on research conducted, Option 2 provides the additional verification of the property having a secure water source rather than only relying on the FMMP mapping designation. This option will also ensure this step is completed when working with a land trust to secure an easement.

7. City Involvement: Easement Acquisition and Maintenance: How much involvement does the city have in easement acquisition and maintenance.

Option 1: The City is not a party to the easement, but the City must approve the form of the easement.

Option 2: The City is a third-party beneficiary to the easement, so that the City may enforce the Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 5
powered by Legistar™
8 File #: 22-0435 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

Option 2: The City is a third-party beneficiary to the easement, so that the City may enforce the easement’s terms, and City must approve the form of the easement.

Option 3: The City is a co-holder of the easement along with the qualified entity.

Staff Recommendation: Option 1
This option limits the liability to the City but provides assurances that the City approves the form of the easement in compliance with Agricultural Preservation Ordinance.

8. Legislative Fee or Ad Hoc Fee: The purpose of the in-lieu fee would provide a developer with an option of potentially paying a fee, in-lieu of acquiring an easement. However, the policy identifies a preference of easements over payment of an in-lieu fee.

Option 1: Formulate and adopt a legislative fee for all projects.

Option 2: Determine an ad hoc fee on a case-by-case basis.

Staff Recommendation: Option 2
This option provides flexibility due to unforeseen factors that may vary from case to case.

9. City Involvement: In-lieu Fee Collection and Expenditure: If an in-lieu fee option is available, any fees collected towards the purchase of easements could be purchased by a qualified entity or directly by the City.

Option 1: The City remits the fees to a qualified entity to acquire an easement.

Option 2: The City either remits the fees to a qualified entity to acquire an easement or directly acquires the easement.

Staff Recommendation: Option 1
This option provides the City the ability to ensure that a qualified entity is tasked with acquiring easements in compliance with Agricultural Preservation Ordinance.

Next Steps:

The consultant and staff will take the direction received during the work session meeting and will prepare an Administrative Draft Agricultural Preservation Ordinance for review and consideration by City staff and the public. The draft Agricultural Preservation Ordinance will be made available for a 30 -day public review period during which time the consultant and staff will facilitate a workshop with the City Council to respond to questions raised during the public review period and to focus on consensus building prior to final adoption.

Fiscal Impact:

On September 19, 2022, the City Council authorized the City Manager to award a contract to Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group of Visalia, CA for the preparation of Agricultural Preservation Ordinance in amount of not to exceed $150,000. Staff is also seeking if the allocated SB 2 Planning Grant monies can be used for the preparation of this ordinance.

Prior Council Action:

On August 18, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-50 which rescinded the adoption of Resolution No. 2021-44, which approved General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01, a request to by the City of Visalia to amend language to General Plan Land Use Policy LU-P-34 by removing the requirement for properties converting farmland within Growth Tiers II and III to enter into an Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 4 of 5
powered by Legistar™
9 File #: 22-0435 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

Agricultural Mitigation Program (AMP).

The adoption of the resolution to rescind the adoption of Resolution No. 2021-44 was based on the ruling of the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Tulare, which invalidated the City of Visalia’sapproval to General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2021-01 and the related certification of an addendum to a previously certified environmental impact report (EIR).

Other: None.

Alternatives: None.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to direct staff and the consultant to begin drafting the Agricultural Preservation Ordinance based on the City Council’s desired options as identified in the staff report and during the work session presentation.

Environmental Assessment Status:

No environmental assessment required at this time. The adoption of an AMO will require CEQA documentation to be completed by City staff.

CEQA Review:

Not at this time. The adoption of the APO will require CEQA documentation to be completed by City staff.

Attachments:

1. Visalia Agricultural Preservation Ordinance PowerPoint Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 5 of 5
powered by Legistar™
10 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
City Council Work Session
December 5, 2022

AGRICULTURAL

PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
11 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
TOPICS
2 Purpose & Approach
Program Options for Discussion
City Council Discussion &
Direction
1 2
3 12

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

PURPOSE
The City Council directed staff to implement an agricultural mitigation program as outlined by General Plan Policy LU-P-34.

The discussion this evening is intended to receive direction from City Council to direct the development of an agricultural preservation ordinance where there are options within the policy language.
3 13

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

PROCESS
4 14

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
POLICY LU-P-34 COMPONENTS
General Plan Policy LU-P-34 calls for the City to create and adopt a mitigation program to address conversion of Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance in Tiers II and III.

The policy directs creation of the program in three primary parts:
5 Applicability
Agricultural Conservation Easements
In-lieu Fee
1 2
3 15

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPROACH POLICY ANALYSIS
6 Policy Parameters. We identified where the policy provides narrow parameters for the program and where the policy directs more broad parameters for the program.

Narrow Parameters Broad Parameters
Provides enough
direction within the
policy language to direct
next steps.

Provides some direction
within the policy
language but needs
further clarification.
16 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPROACH RESEARCH & INTERVIEWS
7 Local Governments
Reviewed 7 existing programs and
interviewed 3 local agencies:
▪ City of Davis
▪ City of Tulare
▪ County of Stanislaus
Land Trusts
Spoke with 9 land trusts and
interviewed staff at 2 land trusts who
work specifically with agricultural
easements:
▪ Sequoia Riverlands Trust
▪ El Rio Reyes Conservation
17 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPROACH FORM & ADOPTION
The Ordinance would be:
▪ Integrated into the City of Visalia Municipal Code.
▪ Directive and provide standards for implementation.

Note: If the City adopts an in-lieu fee, the in-lieu fee should be adopted by resolution.
8 Prepare an Agricultural Preservation Ordinance
18 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

OPTIONS FOR DISCUSSION
Applicability, Easements, and In-lieu Fee
919

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

PROGRAM PARAMETERS & OPTIONS
10 1
2 3
Policy Directives Topics for Discussion
Applicability ▪ Development of prime farmland and
farmland of statewide importance
▪ Tier II and Tier III properties
▪ Exemptions apply to Tier I, agricultural
processing, agricultural buffers, public
facilities, roadways
▪ Designation of prime farmland and
farmland of statewide importance
▪ Exemptions for project size
▪ Exemptions for affordable housing projects
▪ Exemptions for a portion of a project
Easements ▪ 1:1 conversion to preservation
▪ Equivalent land
▪ Located outside Visalia’s Urban
Development Boundary (UDB)
▪ Held by a qualifying entity
▪ Agricultural zoning
▪ Southern San Joaquin Valley
▪ Adequate water supply
▪ Level of City involvement
In-lieu Fee ▪ Allowed as an option
▪ Preference for easement over fee
▪ Case-by-case or set fee
▪ Level of City involvement
20 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION
Policy Directives. Summarizes the language in the policy for the policy component.

Topics for Discussion. Confirms the topics for which options will be presented during this discussion.

Good-to-Know. Shares context specific to the policy component prior to getting into to discussion of the options.

Options. Outlines the options for discussion and items City staff is requesting direction on for the preparation of the Agricultural Preservation Ordinance. 11 Organized by Policy Component: Applicability, Easements, In-Lieu Fee 21 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

1. APPLICABILITY
Farmland Designations and Exemptions
1222

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY POLICY DIRECTIVES
13 1
Conversion of Farmland
The program shall address:
▪ Conversion of Prime Farmland
and Farmland of Statewide
Importance.
▪ In Tiers II and III.

Exemptions
The program shall specifically allow
for exemptions:
▪ In Tier I,
▪ For agricultural processing uses,
▪ For agricultural buffers,
▪ For public facilities, or
▪ For roadways.
23 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION
14 1
▪ How prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance designations are determined and confirmed.
▪ Other exemptions for consideration.
▪ Based on project size,
▪ Based on project type (specifically, affordable housing), and ▪ Exempt uses as part of an overall project.
24 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY GOOD-TO-KNOW
15 1
Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance
Prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance are designated and mapped by the California Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP).
▪ FMMP started in 1982 with the first map produced in 1984. ▪ Maps are updated every 2 years.
▪ Updated maps are released about 2-4 years after the data set. 25 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY GOOD-TO-KNOW
16 1
Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance
Two primary qualities influence designation of prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance:
▪ Land Use. The land has been used for irrigated agricultural production in the last four years.
▪ Soil. The land has soil that meets specific and quantitative physical and chemical criteria.
26 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY GOOD-TO-KNOW
17 1
Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance
Farmland designations are documented through the FMMP . Data is primarily derived from the following sources:
▪ Land Use. Desktop review, supplemented with field verification. Data is updated every 2 to 4 years.
▪ Soil. National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) data. Data was last updated in 1999 for Tulare County and is generally not site-specific. 27 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE 18 In Tiers II and II:
6,309 acres of prime
farmland or farmland of
statewide importance.
5,586 acres of prime
farmland or farmland of
statewide importance
designated for residential,
commercial, or industrial
uses.
28 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY OPTIONS
Confirm Farmland Designation of Property
19 1
FMMP mapping is based on older data. Given the lag in available data, it may be appropriate to allow applicants an opportunity to verify the farmland designation status of the land to be developed.

Option 1. Rely only on the most recent version of FMMP maps.

Option 2. Use the most recent version of the FMMP maps but allow for an individual site assessment process to confirm FMMP designation. 29 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY OPTIONS
Exemption for Project Size
20 1
The policy does not expressly call for an exemption based on the size of the project. However, such an exemption for small properties could be considered.

Option 1. No exemption based on the size of the project.

Option 2. Projects of one acre or less are exempt.

Option 3. Projects of five acres or less are exempt.
30 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY OPTIONS
Exemption for Affordable Housing Projects
21 1
The policy specifically exempts certain uses (agricultural processing, agricultural buffers, and public facilities). The city may consider a specific exemption for affordable housing to align with other panning priorities and requirements.

Option 1. No exemption for affordable housing projects.

Option 2. Exemption for affordable housing projects under the density bonus ordinance.

Option 3. Exemption for 100 percent affordable housing projects. 31 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY OPTIONS
Exemption for Portion of Project
22 1
The policy includes exemptions for certain uses (e.g., agricultural processing, public facilities) but does not address the scope of the exemptions for such uses when a part of a larger project.

Option 1. For the exemption to apply, the exempted use must be the whole of the project. E.g., The project is development of a community park.

Option 2. The exemption applies to the area of the exempted use. E.g., If a 10-acre project includes one acre of an exempted use (e.g., pocket park), the developer must preserve farmland for only nine acres.
32 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

2. EASEMENTS
Location, Qualifying Criteria, and City
Involvement
2333

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

EASEMENTS POLICY DIRECTIVES
24 2
Agricultural Land Preserved
The program shall require that
agricultural land preserved:
▪ Be located outside the City UDB, and
within the southern San Joaquin Valley,
▪ Be a 1:1 ratio to agricultural land
converted,
▪ Be equivalent to agricultural land
converted,
▪ Demonstrate adequate water supply, and
▪ Demonstrate agricultural zoning.

Qualifying Entity
The program shall require:
▪ Easements to be held by a qualifying
entity, such as a local land trust, and
▪ Submission of annual monitoring reports
to the City
34 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

EASEMENTS TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION
25 1
▪ How undefined terms may be implemented in the program:
▪ Southern San Joaquin Valley, and
▪ Adequate water supply.
▪ How integrated the City should be in the easement.
35 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
26 ▪ A voluntary, legally binding agreement
▪ Limits certain types of uses or prevents
development from taking place on a
piece of property now and in the future
▪ Recorded in the chain of title of the
property and it ‘runs with the land’ so
that the restrictions also apply to future
owners of that land
2 EASEMENTS GOOD-TO-KNOW
Agricultural Conservation Easements
36 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

EASEMENTS GOOD-TO-KNOW
27 2
Agricultural Conservation Easements
Landowner. The landowner agrees to use the property only for certain agricultural purposes in perpetuity.

Qualified Entity. The qualified entity is the holder of the easement. It monitors use of the property, may, in some cases, approve certain activities, and may enforce the easement.

Third Party. The easement is typically paid for by a third party (e.g., a developer, government agency, grant funding). The third party is paying the landowner to forfeit their right to use the property for non-agricultural purposes (i.e., residential, commercial, or industrial). 37 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

EASEMENTS OPTIONS
Location of Easements
28 2
The policy calls for agricultural conservation easements to be located within the southern San Joaquin Valley. There are three options for defining the region.

Option 1. Tulare and Kern Option 2. Tulare, Kern,
and Kings
Option 3. Tulare, Kern, Kings,
Fresno, and Madera
38 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

EASEMENTS OPTIONS
Qualifying Criteria: Adequate Water Supply
29 2
The policy requires that the farmland preserved, i.e., the property subject to the conservation easements, “ demonstrate adequate water supply”. There are different methods of demonstrating adequate water supply.

Option 1. Use the FMMP mapping designation as a proxy for demonstrating adequate water supply.

Option 2. In addition to referencing the FMMP mapping designation, verify that the property has at least one source of water (e.g., pre-1914, surface water, groundwater rights).
39 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

EASEMENTS OPTIONS
City Involvement: Easement Acquisition and Maintenance
30 2
The City may become a party to the easement. Whether or not the City is a party to the easement, the City still has an interest that the easement itself accomplishes the intended purposes.

Option 1. The City is not a party to the easement, but the City must approve the form of the easement.

Option 2. The City is a third-party beneficiary to the easement, so that the City may enforce the easement’s terms, and City must approve the form of the easement.

Option 3. The City is a co-holder of the easement along with the qualified entity. 40 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

3. IN-LIEU FEE
Establishment of a Fee and City Involvement
3141

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

IN-LIEU FEE POLICY DIRECTIVES
The program shall:
▪ Allow mitigation to be provided by payment of a fee in-lieu of direct acquisition of an easement, and
▪ Shall indicate a preference of purchase of easements over payments of a fee.
32 3
42 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

IN-LIEU FEE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION
33 3
▪ Calculation of the in-lieu for a legislative fee or an ad hoc fee ▪ City role in the collection and expenditure of fees
43 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE 34 IN-LIEU FEE GOOD-TO-KNOW3
Type of Fee
In-Lieu Fees. In this case, the in-lieu fee is payment of a fee in lieu of acquiring an agricultural conservation easement.

Legislative Fees vs. Ad Hoc Fees.
• Legislative fees are adopted by City Council and applied formulaically to all projects.
• Ad hoc fees are applied on a case-by-case bases to individual projects. 44 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

IN-LIEU FEE GOOD-TO-KNOW
35 3
Mitigation Fee Act
The Mitigation Fee Act requires fees to defray the public facilities needs of development projects meet certain standards.

The Act does not apply to an in-lieu fee for an agricultural conservation easement.
45 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

IN-LIEU FEE GOOD-TO-KNOW
36 3
Fee Components
Purchase Price. The purchase price is the price of the easement. It is paid by the developer to the land trust, who then purchases the easement from the landowner.

Transaction Costs. These costs are paid by the developer to the land trust, who in turn performs the necessary due diligence for the prospective property.

Endowment. The endowment funds ongoing maintenance of the easement.

It is a one-time payment from the developer to the land trust. 46 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

IN-LIEU FEE GOOD-TO-KNOW
Thresholds for In-lieu Fee
37 3
The policy requires a preference of purchase of easements over payment of an in-lieu fee. Typical thresholds used in other jurisdictions that will be considered for the agricultural preservation ordinance include:
▪ Size of the parcel (e.g., smaller than 20 acres).
▪ No qualified entity exists or is willing to hold the easement. ▪ No landowner is willing to sell an easement.
47 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

IN-LIEU FEE OPTIONS FOR DISCUSSION
Legislative Fee or Ad Hoc Fee
38 3
The purpose of the in-lieu fee is that a developer, in-lieu of acquiring an agricultural conservation easement, pays the City a fee to be used towards acquiring agricultural conservation easements.

Option 1. Formulate and adopt a legislative fee for all projects.

Option 2. Determine an ad hoc fee on a case-by-case basis. 48 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

IN-LIEU FEE OPTIONS
City Involvement: In-lieu Fee Collection and Expenditure 39 3
As in-lieu fees, the fees collected should be spent towards acquisition of agricultural conservation easements. Those agricultural easements could be purchased by a qualified entity or directly by the City.

Option 1. The City remits the fees to a qualified entity to acquire an easement.

Option 2. The City either remits the fees to a qualified entity to acquire an easement or directly acquires the easement.
49 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION &

DIRECTION
4050

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

CONFIRMATION OF APPROACH
41 51

CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

APPLICABILITY SUMMARY OF OPTIONS
42 Confirm Farmland
Designation of
Property
Option 1. Rely only on the most recent version of FMMP maps.

Option 2. Use the most recent version of the FMMP maps but allow for an individual site assessment process (by the applicant) to confirm FMMP designation.

Exemption for Size
of Project
Option 1. No exemption based on the size of the project.

Option 2. Projects of one acre or less are exempt.

Option 3. Projects of five acres or less are exempt.

Exemption for
Affordable Housing
Projects
Option 1. No exemption for affordable housing projects.

Option 2. Exemption for certain affordable housing projects.

Option 3. Exemption for all affordable housing projects.

Exemption for
Portion of the
Project
Option 1. For the exemption to apply, the exempted use must be the whole of the project.

Option 2. The exemption applies to the area of the exempted use. 52 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

EASEMENTS SUMMARY OF OPTIONS
43 Location of
Easements
Option 1. Counties of Tulare and Kern.

Option 2. Counties of Tulare, Kern, and Kings.

Option 3. Counties of Tulare, Kern, Kings, Fresno, and Madera.

Qualifying Criteria:

Adequate Water
Supply
Option 1. Use the FMMP mapping designation as a proxy for demonstrating adequate water supply.

Option 2. In addition to referencing the FMMP mapping designation, verify that the property has at least one source of water.

City Involvement:

Easement
Acquisition and
Maintenance
Option 1. The City is not a party to the easement, but the City must approve the form of the easement.

Option 2. The City is a third-party beneficiary to the easement, so that the City may enforce the easement’s terms, and City must approve the form of the easement.

Option 3. The City is a co-holder of the easement along with the qualified entity. 53 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

IN-LIEU FEE SUMMARY OF OPTIONS
44 Legislative Fee or
Ad Hoc Fee
Option 1. Formulate and adopt a legislative fee for all projects.

Option 2. Determine an ad hoc fee on a case-by-case basis.

City Involvement:

In-lieu Fee
Collection and
Expenditure
Option 1. The City remits the fees to a qualified entity to acquire an easement.

Option 2. The City either remits the fees to a qualified entity to acquire an easement or directly acquires the easement.
54 CITY OF VISALIA AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

STAY INFORMED
45 Contact:

Paul Bernal, Community Development Director
[email protected]
(559) 713-4025
Visit the Website:
https://www.visalia.city/depts/co
mmunity_development/planning
/agricultural_preservation_ordin
ance.asp
55 Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0447 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 1.

Agenda Item Wording:

Ceremonial Swearing In - Nicholas Bartsch, Public Works Director Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
56 Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0448 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

Agenda Item Wording:

Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to City of Visalia Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
57 Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0153 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 1.

Agenda Item Wording:

Authorization to read ordinances by title only.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
58 Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0421 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

Agenda Item Wording:

Approve the Citizens Advisory Committee’s recommendation to appoint Rebecca Donabed and Charles Garza to fill two vacant voting positions on the Citizens Advisory Committee.

Deadline for Action: 12/5/2022
Submitting Department: Police Department
Contact Name and Phone Number: Captain Luma Fahoum; ext. 4103, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Public Works Manager Jason Serpa, ext. 4312, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Department Recommendation:

Approve the Citizens Advisory Committee’s recommendation to appoint Rebecca Donabed and Charles Garza as voting members of the Citizens Advisory Committee.

Summary:

The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) consists of eleven (11) members. There are currently three (3) vacancies on the committee. If this appointment is approved by Council, Rebecca Donabed and Charles Garza will fill the vacancies for the term that will expire in June 2023, at which time they will be eligible to be appointed by their second term.

Background Discussion:

The CAC meets monthly for a variety of purposes including:
· Annually review the City’s use of the Measure T Public Safety Sales Tax, commenting on the City Manager’s certified budget and the outside auditor’s review of monies spent. · Provide two (2) members to sit on the Measure N Oversight Committee. · Annually conduct a public opinion survey of residents’ satisfaction with City Services. · Provide training, review, and recommendations to Council for the distribution of non-profit youth grants.
· Provide input on the City’s use of Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and other programs from Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
· Provide Council feedback on an annual basis with regards to proposed new and/or increased fees and rates.

If the recommended appoints of Rebecca Donabed and Charles Garza are approved by Council, the eleven (11) member committee will be made up of the following members:

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
59 File #: 22-0421 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

1. Jones, Ed
1st term: 7/1/2022 - 6/2024

2. Curtis, George
1st term: 7/2021 - 6/2023

3. Stewart, Glen
1st term: 7/2021 - 6/2023

4. Vacant
UET term: 7/2021 - 6/2023

5. Deniston-Sheets, Holly
1st term: 7/2021 - 6/2023

6. Ruiz, Frank -1st term: 7/2018 - 6/2020; 2nd term: 7/2020 - 6/2022, 3rd term: 7/2022 - 6/2024 TBRA 7/18/22

7. Vacant
1st term: 10/2021 - 6/2023

8. Vacant
1st term: 7/2022- 6/2024

9. Juan Lopez
1st term: 7/1/2022 - 6/2024

10. Salgado, Miguel TBA 7/18/22
UET: 5/2022 - 6/2023

11. Pierce, Kelly
1st term: 10/2021 - 6/2023
Applicants:

Rebecca Donabed is an advocate for people with disabilities and is formerly serving as a member on the State Council on Developmental Disabilities Employment (SCDDE) and the Resources for Independence Central Valley (RICV) Board of Directors. Rebecca is involved in Tulare’s Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) and the Voting Accessibility Advisory Committee (VAAC). She hopes to bring her committee experience to the CAC and work with the City of Visalia in its continued development as a great place to live and work.

Charles Garza’s application comes with over 27 years of experience as an educator throughout the valley. As a resident of Visalia for 23 years, Charles has served the City of Visalia many times by being a part of numerous committees in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Charles’ goal is to work with the City of Visalia in its continued growth and prosperity.

Fiscal Impact:

N/A
Prior Council Action: Council has historically affirmed the recommendations of the CAC related to the appointment of new members.

Other: N/A
Alternatives: N/A
Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
60 File #: 22-0421 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 2.

Approve the Citizens Advisory Committee’s recommendation to appoint Rebecca Donabed and Charles Garza to fill two (2) vacant positions on the committee.

Environmental Assessment Status: N/A
CEQA Review: N/A
Attachments: CAC applications for Rebecca Donabed and Charles Garza.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0414 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 3.

Agenda Item Wording:

Authorize the City Manager to approve a contract amendment for Carollo Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $97,070 for the Update to the Stormwater Master Plan (Project Number 2450- 72000/CP9067-999) and an additional appropriation of $100,000 from Storm Sewer Construction Fund 221.

Deadline for Action: None.

Submitting Department: Administration - CIP Engineering Contact Name and Phone Number:

Katherine Woodhull-Fuget, Assistant Engineer, [email protected], (559) 713- 4447
Frank Senteno, City Engineer, [email protected], (559) 713-4331 Nick Mascia, Assistant City Manager, [email protected], (559) 713-4323 Department Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a consultant contract amendment for the development of additional Capital Improvement Projects by Carollo Engineers, Inc. to Update the Stormwater Master Plan in the amount of $97,070 (CP9067); and

2. Authorize an additional appropriation of $100,000 from Storm Sewer Construction Fund 221 to CP9067.

Background Discussion:

The main purpose of updating these master plans is to adequately size storm water and sewer system facilities for the future growth in accordance with the 2014 General Plan update. The 2014 General Plan update contains new policies and changes to land use types and land use densities that have a direct impact on the sizing of these facilities. The current master plans in use were updated in 1994 based on the 1990 General Plan. These master plan updates should track on the same cycle of updates that occur to the General Plan. Staff is currently updating these master plans and will be presenting an introduction to the Nexus Study at the December 19th Work Session, if time permits. The tentative schedule is to assemble the Impact Fee and Service Charges and present to City Council with a draft report at various City Council meetings in spring of 2023 with a final report and public hearing to follow. The schedule is subject to change based on the Consultant findings, public input, and City Council direction.

Sewer and Storm Drain Master Plan(s) History:

In 2003, the City authorized Carollo Engineers, P. C. to prepare an update to the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. Carollo delivered a sewer model and master plan report in 2005. In 2006, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) to update the Storm Master Plan and received only one Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 5
powered by Legistar™
68 File #: 22-0414 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 3.
issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) to update the Storm Master Plan and received only one proposal, from Boyle Engineering Corp. After pulling the contract award to Boyle from the consent calendar on November 6th, 2006 due to concerns with the scope of work, Council authorized Boyle to proceed with the data collection and model development phases but not the master plan analysis or report. Boyle delivered an in-progress storm drain model and draft future project list in 2007.

Programmatic Environmental Impact Reports were not created for either the 2005 Sewer nor the 2007 Storm Master Plan updates, and so neither were officially implemented. Efforts were halted with the start of the General Plan update process so that any General Plan changes could be incorporated into the master plans.

In 2013, Staff resumed efforts to update the master plans, including formally terminating the contract with Boyle while ensuring the City retained the rights to the storm water modeling data produced by Boyle for future use. In 2014, the current City General Plan was adopted. In 2016, Staff went to Council with a work session item to discuss the impacts of 2014 General Plan Policies on the master plans and to receive Council feedback on the proposed scope of work for a new RFP to update the master plans.

In the fall of 2017 City staff issued RFP 17-18-29 to hire a consultant to update the City’spublic facility master plans for storm water and sanitary sewer collection. The general scope of work included hydrology, hydraulic modeling and analysis, planning level design, cost estimating, stakeholder outreach, presentations, financial analysis and report writing. The City received proposals from two (2) consultants in response to the RFP. A three-person Selection Committee was established to review, rate and rank the Proposals. The rating of the Proposals showed the one submitted by Carollo Engineers to be consistently and clearly ranked the highest. On September 4th, 2018, Council authorized the City Manager to execute a contract with Carollo Engineers, Inc to update the City’s public facility master plans for stormwater and sanitary sewer collection. The contract was split into two separate CIP’s.

The updates to the Stormwater Master Plan (CP9067) had an original contract amount not to exceed $326,700 and the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan (CP0015) a not to exceed contract amount of $279,200.

These master plans provide necessary guidance to City staff for capital projects and to private developers for knowing the City’srequirements for storm water and sewer system facilities. This includes when to have the developer upsize their line to meet the plan. Additionally, these master plans will include nexus studies that will provide an equitable distribution of development and maintenance costs through updated development impact fees and service charges, respectively, for storm water and sanitary sewer collection.

This contract amendment focuses solely on the Stormwater Master Plan.

Current Stormwater Master Plan Background:

Carollo’sinitial proposed scope of work included developing an existing conditions storm drain model from scratch. In an attempt to cut costs, Staff at the time proposed using the model produced by the halted Boyle Engineering 2005 master plan efforts as a baseline conditions model that Carollo’s subcontractor, CWE, could convert from InfoSWMM to EPASWMM (Modeling formats) and then add minor updates to bring the model from the 2005 condition up to the present. This was a significant decrease in scope from Carollo’s initial proposal, and, had things gone as planned, would have Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 5
powered by Legistar™
69 File #: 22-0414 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 3.
decrease in scope from Carollo’s initial proposal, and, had things gone as planned, would have saved a substantial amount of money. Unfortunately, when the 2005 model was delivered to the consultant after the contract was awarded, they determined that the model was not actually a complete and detailed model of the 2005 conditions. A significant amount of infrastructure and subcatchments (drainage areas) were missing, and much of what was in the model was inaccurate.

As a result, extra time and effort were required to get the storm drain model up to where it was expected to be at the start of the project. This extra work was performed under Amendment #1 and Amendment #1 was approved in August 2021 increasing the contract amount by $132,543, bringing the storm contract amount to $459,243.

Project Delays:

The City staff member originally responsible for the project having the most project and institutional knowledge left the City shortly after the project started, making things even more difficult for the consultant. The project has changed hands twice more since then, creating delays in resolving missing data gaps. Delays were also created due to limited City data and staff availability. Further, the City was slow to deliver required project data due to difficulty locating the information.

Development of the existing storm drain system model was an iterative process; delayed by constant setbacks due to having to chase down information in the field or through available plans. And as stated above, there was a significant amount of effort needed to develop the correspondingly amount of added infrastructure and identified deficiencies in the existing system. During these delays, the Consultant also experienced staff turnover, which added time and cost as additional staff had to be brought up to speed on the model.

Contract Amendment #2:

When Carollo and CWE developed the initial contract and the first contract amendment, they assumed a total of 20 to 25 CIP projects would be developed to address both existing deficiencies and future conditions. The original cost for the Master Plan Development Capital Improvement Plan sub-task was based on 20 to 25 CIPs at $3,000 to $5,000 per concept developed. Over the past year, the consultant and staff identified 19-existing deficiency CIPs, three of which have alternative options, and 31-future conditions CIPs for a total of 53 projects and/or concepts developed. These additional CIPs have exhausted the budget for the storm master plan.

Therefore, the following contract amendments are requested for the Storm Water Master Plan:

Item 1: Master Plan Development (Task 3)
This amendment accounts for the costs for developing 31-additional CIPs not originally budgeted for.

These efforts include model development and analysis, determination of the trunkline and basin locations and sizes, evaluation of the previously proposed CIP projects identified by the City for the existing conditions, development of the CIP data sheets for the master plan, and one revision of the sheets based on City comments. There will be no revisions above these efforts.

Net Increase:$91,770
Item 2: Project Management (Task 6)
This amendment also accounts for additional meetings and teleconferences required to complete the project.

Net Increase:$5,300
The capital costs for the new CIPs associated with this amendment in addition to capital costs identified in the Sewer Master Plan Study will be incorporated into the Nexus Study. The nexus Study Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 5
powered by Legistar™
70 File #: 22-0414 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 3.
identified in the Sewer Master Plan Study will be incorporated into the Nexus Study. The nexus Study is a comprehensive study that will update impact fees for new development and update the storm sewer service charges that are billed monthly to existing development. Staff will be presenting an introduction to the Nexus Study at the December 19th Work Session.

Change Order Committee:

The amendment went before the Change Order Committee on November 10th, 2022. The Change Order committee is a group of non-appointed technical staff without direct involvement with the project submitted for review. The Committee is an informal committee that reviews the contract change order request for completeness, accuracy, constructability, objectivity, consistency, and overall insight. After reviewing the request and discussing the item, the committee recommended approval of the amendment of the contract to Carollo.

Fiscal Impact:

The Update to the Storm Master Plan (CP9067) is funded by the Storm Sewer Construction Fund (221). The total project budget is $591,100 as shown in the following budget summary:

Update to Storm Master Plan: Project CP9067
Funding Source: Fund 221
Project Funding $451,100
Funds Appropriated 8/16/21 $140,000
Total Project Funding $591,100
Project Expenditures as of 6/30/22
Carollo Contract Including Amendment 1 $382,352.05
Project Management $106,813.78
Sub-total Expenditures $489,165.83
Remaining Project Expenditures
Carollo Contract $76,890.95
Carollo Amendment 2 $97,070
Project Management (Estimate) $22,000
Contingency (~6% Amendment 2) $5,000
Sub-total Remaining Expenditures $200,960.95
Total Estimated Cost $690,126.78
Budget Deficit $(99,026.78)
Staff recommends the appropriation of $100,000 from Fund 221 to address the anticipated budget deficit shown in the table above.

Prior Council Action:

August 16, 2021
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 4 of 5
powered by Legistar™
71 File #: 22-0414 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 3.

Authorize the City Manager to approve a contract amendment for Carollo Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $132,543 for the Update to the Stormwater Master Plan (Project Number 2450- 72000/CP9067-999); and authorize the appropriation of $140,00 from Storm Sewer Construction Fund (221) to CP9067.

September 4, 2018
Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement for RFP 17-18-29 to Update the City’s Public Facility Master Plans for Storm Water and Sanitary Sewer Collection with Carollo Engineers, Inc. in the amounts of $326,700 (CP9067) and $279,200 (CP0015), authorized the appropriation of $155,285 from Fund 221 to CP9067, and authorized the appropriation of $12,000 from Fund 231 to CP0015.

June 6, 2016
Work session to review key topics related to the City’ssewer system and storm water master plans and receive Council feedback for incorporation into the scope of work and authorize the advertising of a Request for Proposals (RFP) to update these master plans.

Alternatives:

None recommended
Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to authorize the City Manager to approve a contract amendment for Carollo Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $97,070 for the Update to the Stormwater Master Plan (Projecct Number 2450- 72000/CP9067-999) and the appropriation of $100,000 from Fund 221 to CP9067.

Environmental Assessment Status:

N/A
CEQA Review:

A Programmatic Environmental Impact Report will be required prior to the adoption of the public facility master plans. Staff intend to issue a new RFP for the development of the storm and sewer master plan programmatic EIRs.

Attachments:

1. Proposed Contract Amendment 2

2. August 16th, 2021 Agenda Item
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 5 of 5
powered by Legistar™
72 1401 Fulton Street, Suite 802, Fresno, California 93721 P. 559.436.6616 F. 559.436.1191

11246A.00 | Amendment 2.docx
October 28, 2022

Mr. Frank Senteno, PE
City Engineer
City of Visalia
315 East Acequia Avenue
Visalia, CA 93291
Subject: Amendment No. 2 for the City of Visalia Public Facility Master Plans for Storm Water and Sanitary Sewer Collection
Dear Mr. Senteno:

Per our previous discussions, the Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo)/CWE team are requesting an amendment to the City of Visalia Public Fac ilities Master Plans for Storm Water and Sanitary Sewer Collection Project (Master Plans). The Storm Water portion of the Master Plans Project is over budget for several tasks due to the extra work that was not anticipated during the development of Amendme nt 1 to the master plans . The following summarizes the additional effort that was not originally included in Amendment 1.

Storm Water Master Plan
The stormwater portion of the project is over budget for several tasks. The master plan originally expected a total of 20 to 25 CIP projects (existing and proposed). There are currently 19 existing conditions CIP projects and three of them have alternative options for a total of 22 projects. The original scope of work was prepared based on an assumption of 20 to 25 projects with a cost of $3,000 to $5,000 per concept developed. There are 31 proposed conditions projects under evaluation. The work on the existing conditions CIP projects and the initial evaluation of proposed conditions projects has exhaust ed the budget for the master plan. The City would like the proposed conditions CIP projects to be evaluated and to be included in the NEXUS study for evaluating usage fees. The Master Plan Report writeup will still be prepared as scoped .

The costs provided for the amendment include the current work that is progressing o n 31 proposed conditions CIP projects. These efforts include model development and analysis, determination of the trunkline and basin locations and sizes, evaluation of the previously proposed CIP projects identified by the City for the existing conditions , development of the CIP data sheets for the master plan, and one revision of the sheets based on City comments. There will be no revisions above these efforts.

Sewer Master Plan
We are not requesting any amendments to the Sewer Master Plan tasks (Tasks 7 – 12).

Proposed Fee Adjustments for Master Plans
The attached letter from Vik Bapna, dated October 21 , 2022 provides a detailed breakdown of the estimated effort needed for CWE to comple te the Storm Water Master Plan, along with a detailed breakdown of the effort expended to date. Table 1 below provides a summary of the original estimated fee, by task. It also summarizes the additional funds needed to complete the project, including a subconsultant markup of 2.5- percent, which has been reduced from Carollo’s standard 10 -percent subconsultant markup in an attempt to minimize costs to the City to the extent possib le. We are requesting an additional $ 97,070 be added to the Master Plans contract, for a total revised contract amount of $ 835,713.

73 Mr. Frank Senteno, PE
City Engineer
City of Visalia
October 28, 2022

carollo.com
Table 1 Revised Fee Estimate for the City of Visalia Public Facility Master Plans Task
No. Task Name
Original
Contract
Amount ($)
Additional Requested
Funds(1),(2)($)
Total Revised
Contract ($)
Storm Water Master Plan
1 Data Review $23,494 $0 $23,494
2 Model Development $175,478 $0 $175,478
3 Master Plan Development $169,080 $91,770 $260,850
4 Nexus Study $33,400 $0 $33,400
5 Stakeholder Involvement $18,600 $0 $18,600
6 Project Management $39,391 $5,300 $44,691
Storm Water Master Plan Subtotal $459,443 $97,070 $556,513 Sewer Master Plan
7 Data Review $81,400 $0 $81,400
8 Model Development $60,200 $0 $60,200
9 Master Plan Development $77,800 $0 $77,800
10 Nexus Study $16,700 $0 $16,700
11 Stakeholder Involvement $17,600 $0 $17,600
12 Project Management $25,500 $0 $25,500
Sewer Master Plan Subtotal $279,200 $0 $279,200
Total $738,643 $97,070 $835,713
Notes:
(1) The attached letter from Vik Bapna, dated October 21, 2022 provides a detailed breakdown of the estimated effort needed for CWE to complete the Storm Water Master Plan. This table provides the additional funds needed to complete the Master Plan. (2) The total additional funds requested include a 2.5-percent subconsultant markup , which has been reduced from the standard 10-percent markup in an attempt to minimize additional costs to the City.

We appreciate being of service on this project , and look forward to completing the master plans as soon as possible. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.

Ryan F. Orgill, PE
Project Manager

RFO:cjp

Enclosures: Letter from Vik Bapna, dated October 21, 2022

cc: Katherine Woodhull-Fuget, Ben Willardson
74 CWE
1561 E. ORANGETHORPE
AVENUE
SUITE 240
FULLERTON, CA 92831-5202
(714) 526-7500 PHONE
(714) 526-7004 FAX
www.cwecorp.com

Creating a Better Tomorrow, Today™
October 21, 2022

Mr. Frank Senteno, PE
City Engineer
City of Visalia
315 East Acequia Avenue
Visalia, California 93291

Change Order Request: City of Visalia Stormwater Master Plan Modeling

Dear Mr. Senteno,

As requested in previous discussions, CWE has prepared a change order request for the City of Visalia Stormwater Master Plan modeling effort and development of the stormwater masterplan which includes a summary of the need for additional funds and the amount requested. The project is over budget for several tasks. The master plan originally expected a total of 20 to 25 CIP projects (existing and proposed). There are currently 19 existing conditions CIP projects and three of them have alternative options for a total of 22 projects. The original scope of work was prepared based on an assumption of 20 to 25 projects with a cost of $3,000 to $5,000 per concept developed. The budget for this work was exceeded as we have worked on completing the existing conditions CIP project analysis and have started on the proposed conditions analysis.

There are 31 proposed conditions projects under evaluation. The work on the existing conditions CIP projects and the initial evaluation of proposed conditions projects has exhausted the budget for the master plan. The City would like the proposed conditions CIP projects to be evaluated and to be included in the NEXUS study for evaluating usage fees.

CWE has continued working on the CIP projects to keep the project moving forward as requested by City staff. We have been working with the City staff to determine the most cost effective way to complete the work needed for the NEXUS study and master plan. Several tasks with lower benefits to the master planning effort are expected to be dropped. These include evaluation of the system performance under the updated design storm with and without Low Impact Development (LID), evaluation of an increased design storm depth of 0.5 and 1.0 inches, and evaluation of ditches with Kaweah flows and storm water.

The costs provided for the change order include the current work that is progressing on 31 proposed conditions CIP projects. These efforts include model development and analysis, determination of the trunkline and basin locations and sizes, evaluation of the previously proposed CIP projects identified by the City for the existing conditions, development of the CIP data sheets for the master plan, and one revision of the sheets based on City comments. There will be no revisions above these efforts. This information will be provided to Carollo for continuation of the NEXUS study. 75 Mr. Frank Senteno, PE
October 21, 2022

Creating a Better Tomorrow, Today™

The table below shows the most current and previous invoice fees, the funds spent to date, and the total contract amount. The amount that is required to finish the modeling work and the Stormwater Master Plan are provided in the last column.

Task Description Billed to
Date
Actual
Cost to
Date
Contract
Amount
Percent
Complete
Expended
Cost
Above
Contract
Estimate
to
Complete
Total
Additional
Need
1 Review Data $19,840 $19,795 $19,840 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2 Model
Development $156,480 $156,456 $156,480 100% $0.00 $0.00 3 Master Plan $127,645.80 $201,399 $134,364 90% $67,035 $22,505 $89,540 5 Stakeholder
Involvement $0.00 $0.00 $1,000 0% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7 Project
Management $18,019.45 $18,116 $18,110 100% $0.00 $5,172 $5,172 Total $321,985.25 $395,766 $329,794 ~93% $94,712

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Dr. Ben Willardson at (801) 310-6153 or at [email protected], or me at (714) 526-7500 Ext. 212 or [email protected].

Respectfully submitted,
CWE

Vik Bapna, PE, ENV SP, CPSWQ, QSD/P
Principal
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0408 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 4.

Agenda Item Wording:

Authorize the City Manager to approve payment to California Water Service in the amount of $150,259.00 for the installation of five fire hydrants and two irrigation services as part of the Riggin Widening project between Mooney Blvd to Conyer St and appropriate an additional $85,000 in Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) funds (3010-72000/CIP0473-999).

Deadline for Action: None
Submitting Department: Administration - CIP Engineering Contact Name and Phone Number:

Diego Corvera, Civil Engineer, [email protected], (559) 713-4209 Frank Senteno, City Engineer, [email protected], (559) 713-4331 Nick Mascia, Assistant City Manager, [email protected], (559) 713-4323 Department Recommendation:

Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to approve payment to California Water Service in the amount of $150,259.00 for the installation of up to five fire hydrants and two irrigation services as part of the Riggin Widening Project between Mooney Blvd to Conyer St. and appropriate an additional $85,000 in Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) funds approved towards this project.

Background Discussion:

The Riggin Widening Project from Mooney Blvd to Conyer St (CP0473) will widen the existing roadway to four lanes, provide bike lanes, a local frontage road, sidewalks, drainage improvements, and new medians. The widening of the existing roadway requires the installation of five fire hydrants along the 1/2 mile span as well as two irrigation service meters to serve the new median landscaping.

The purpose of the “Riggin Avenue Widening Project” is to increase vehicle capacity on Riggin Avenue by adding additional east/west lanes and to provide for an efficient flow of traffic in support of the increase in development within the surrounding area. In addition, the City Council identified this segment of Riggin Avenue from Mooney Boulevard to North Conyer Street as a priority transportation corridor as it is part of the “Ring-Road” concept previously identified in various City reports.

This project will install up to five new fire hydrants(final requirements are still being assessed) Similar to the Riggin Avenue Akers to Demaree Widening project, the hydrants were not installed in conjunction with the installation of the water main. The California Fire Code Appendix C Table C102.1 note c states: “Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, fire hydrants shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 1,000 feet to provide for transportation hazards.” Per code, the one mile span of Riggin from Mooney Blvd to Dinuba Blvd should have had a minimum of five hydrants installed when Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 5
powered by Legistar™
101
File #: 22-0408 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 4.

Riggin from Mooney Blvd to Dinuba Blvd should have had a minimum of five hydrants installed when the water main was installed. Unfortunately, no hydrants along the frontage of this span were required to be installed at the time of development similar to the segment of Riggin between Akers Street and Demaree Street.

The subdivision south of Riggin Ave along this segment was originally in the County and subsequently annexed into the City. The placement and locations of the proposed fire hydrants are necessary based on current code and life safety standards.

Per the same California Code Appendix C Table C102.1 note h states: “The fire code official is authorized to modify the location, number and distribution of the fire hydrants based on site-specific constraints and hazards.”
In coordination with the City of Visalia Fire Marshal, the final approved hydrant spacing and locations will beconsistent with the needs for the area and per the City ordinance below:

Per the Municipal Code Subdivision Ordinance:
“Single-family residential developments shall be provided with fire hydrants every six hundred (600) lineal feet of residential frontage. In isolated developments, no less than two (2) fire hydrants shall be provided not more that six hundred (600) lineal feet apart from one another.” Therefore, in compliance with this ordinance, this segment of Riggin Ave will install a maximum of five fire hydrants within 600ft of each other to meet the needs of the proposed frontage road and ensure emergency response has adequate water in the event of a fire emergency to service the fronting homes.

Due to the frontage road configuration, the fire trucks will not be able to access the frontage directly and would need to connect to a water source at the designed fire bays in the event of a fire emergency along the fronting homes. Those fire bays and hydrant placement are configured in the middle of the blocks to ensure even and equitable response to all fronting homes. These placements were in conjunction with City of Visalia Fire Department.

Due to the proximity of the proposed fire hydrants to the Cal Water main in Riggin Ave, Cal Water requires that the hydrants be installed by their approved contractor, West Valley Construction. In an attempt to reduce costs, City Staff met with Cal Water and determined that the major contributor to the estimated cost was traffic control. After discussion, Cal Water agreed to provide a cost estimate utilizing the assumption that West Valley could use the traffic control provided by the street widening project’s general contractor.

The cost estimate received on October 24, 2022, totals $150,259.00 (including $1,424.00 for state and federal taxes) for five hydrants plus two irrigation service meters.

In order to initiate coordination with Cal Water, the City previously provided an advance deposit of $5,000. An additional advance deposit of not to exceed amount of $150,259.00 is needed for Cal Water to perform the installation. Once the project is complete, if the actual cost of work performed is different than the deposit, staff will follow the procurement code to ‘settle’ with Cal Water for payment.

The Riggin Widening Project from Mooney Blvd to Conyer St is currently slated for construction in Summer of 2023. This segment of Riggin will be constructed in phases to minimize impact to Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 5
powered by Legistar™
102
File #: 22-0408 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 4.
residents and allow for through traffic.

For informational purposes, below is a recap of the three (3) currently funded Capital Improvements Projects for the widening of Riggin Avenue.

Riggin Avenue Projects Status:
- Riggin Avenue widening from Kelsey St to Shirk St
o Currently in Design
o Construction Summer 2024 (Utility Relocation Spring 2024) - Riggin Avenue widening from Akers St to Demaree St
o Design Completed
o Construction January 2023
- Riggin Avenue Widening from Mooney Blvd to Conyer St. (Subject Project) o Currently in Design
o Construction Summer 2023 (Utility Relocation Spring 2023) Refer to attached Riggin Widening Project exhibit, for project locations.

Fiscal Impact:

See below the project budget breakdown.

CIP 0473: Riggin Avenue Widening (Mooney to Conyer)
Project Budget Amount
Measure R Regional Funds (133) $1,300,000
Measure R Regional Funds (XFR to CP0397) ($1,100,000)
Traffic Impact Fee (241) $1,800,000
Highway Improvement Program (HIP) Funding (281) $2,400,000 Highway Improvement Program (HIP) additional appropriation (281)
$85,000
Total Estimated Budget $4,485,000
Project Costs Amount
Project Management $100,000
Design Services $175,000
Utility Relocation $188,000
Roadway Construction $5,300,000
Fire Hydrant Installation (Cal Water Payment) Not to Exceed Amount
$150,259
Construction Management $200,000
Soft Cost Contingency $100,000
Total Estimated Project Costs $6,213,259
Surplus (Deficit) ($1,728,259)Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™
103
File #: 22-0408 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 4.

CIP 0473: Riggin Avenue Widening (Mooney to Conyer)
Project Budget Amount
Measure R Regional Funds (133) $1,300,000
Measure R Regional Funds (XFR to CP0397) ($1,100,000)
Traffic Impact Fee (241) $1,800,000
Highway Improvement Program (HIP) Funding (281) $2,400,000 Highway Improvement Program (HIP) additional appropriation (281)
$85,000
Total Estimated Budget $4,485,000
Project Costs Amount
Project Management $100,000
Design Services $175,000
Utility Relocation $188,000
Roadway Construction $5,300,000
Fire Hydrant Installation (Cal Water Payment) Not to Exceed Amount
$150,259
Construction Management $200,000
Soft Cost Contingency $100,000
Total Estimated Project Costs $6,213,259
Surplus (Deficit) ($1,728,259)
This project is federally funded and those monies have been awarded as of August of 2022.

Construction is scheduled for Summer of 2023 in order to spend down the federal funding as required per the conditions of award.

Appropriation
An additional $85,000 is being requested for appropriation to account for the total amount of Highway Improvement Program (HIP) funds approved by the California Department of Transportation on August 2022 in the amount of $2,485,000. Original project budget only accounted for $2,400,000.

The actual HIP funds that were approved were $2,485,000, so this appropriation corrects the budget to reflect actual funding amounts.

Deficit
A large portion of the deficit is attributed to the transfer of Measure R Regional funds in the amount of $1,100,000 being requested as part of a separate agenda item also on the Council agenda for December 5th, 2022 to transfer these funds from this Riggin Widening from Mooney to Conyer project to the Riggin Widening from Akers to Demaree project (CP0397) in order to keep construction moving forward. City staff is currently working with TCAG staff to allocate additional Measure R Regional funds to the Riggin Avenue Widening projects to cover budget shortfalls. The projected deficit will be resolved before or at the time of award of the construction contract for this Riggin Avenue Widening segment.

There are sufficient funds in the project budget to fund the payment to Cal Water for the installation of five fire hydrants and two irrigation services.

Prior Council Action:

September 19, 2022
Authorized the City Manager to execute the Southern California Edison (SCE) Joint Use Agreement (JUA) and adopted Resolution 2022-52 for the Riggin Widening project between Mooney Blvd to Conyer Street.

August 1, 2022
Received a staff presentation on the proposed local frontage road to be constructed with the Riggin Avenue Project Mooney Blvd to Conyer Street.

June 20, 2022
Adopted resolutions 2022-39 and 2022-40, designating a portion of the City owned property located within 2 parcels of two different subdivisions: Lot “A”of Highland Park Estates subdivision and Lot “A” of Highland Park, Unit No. 2 Subdivision as part of the public City Street System Respectively May 16, 2022
Adopted resolution 2022-33 authorizing the City Manager to execute Southern California Edison (SCE) Utility Agreement No. FFY22/23 - 0473-04 for the Riggin Widening project between Mooney Blvd to Conyer Street.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 4 of 5
powered by Legistar™
104
File #: 22-0408 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 4.

April 18, 2022
Adopted Resolution No. 2022-27 certifying Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-16 prepared for California Environmental Quality Ave (CEQA) compliance as part of the Highway Improvement Program (HIP) funding for the construction of the “Riggin Avenue Widening Project” from North Mooney Boulevard to North Conyer Street (State Clearing house No. 2022030456) (Resolution No. 2022-16 required).

June 21, 2021
Authorized the City Manager to award a sole source professional design services contract to 4Creeks, Inc., for the design of the “RigginAvenue Widening Project”from North Mooney Boulevard to North Conyer Street, and appropriation of funds to establish a preliminary project budget.

Alternatives:

Council may direct Staff to not authorize payment and attempt to negotiate further with Cal Water.

Likely to create project delays with minimal or no further cost savings.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to authorize the City Manager to approve payment to California Water Service in the amount of $150,259.00 for the installation of up to five fire hydrants and two irrigation services along Riggin Avenue as part of the Riggin Widening Project from Mooney Blvd to Conyer St. and appropriate an $85,000 in HIP funds.

Environmental Assessment Status:

Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-16
Attachments:

1. Riggin All Segments Exhibit

2. Cal Water Cost Estimate Letter

3. Riggin Mooney Blvd to Conyer St Hydrant Plan Sheets
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 5 of 5
powered by Legistar™
105
S a i n t J o h n s R i v e r
Modoc Ditch
Construction
January 2023
Construction
Summer 2024*
Construction
Summer 2023*
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Legend
Riggin Segment
CP0397: Akers to Demaree
CP0398: Kelsey to Shirk
CP0473: Mooney to Conyer
Railroad
Waterways
City Limits
Parcels
Urban Development Boundary Tier 1
Urban Development Boundary Tier 2
Urban Growth Boundary Tier 3
0 0.3 0.60.15 Miles
¯
Riggin Widening Projects
*Pending SCE Relocation
106
DETAIL REFERENCEEXIST. ASPHALT CONCRETE(NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)EXIST. CONCRETEPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED ASPHALT CONCRETESTAMPED MEDIAN (C-35) LEGENDCONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY)GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:1.ALL SAWCUTS TO BE A NEAT, CLEAN, ON GRADE EDGE.2.ALL NEW CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DOWELED INTO EXIST.CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PER CITY STD. C-34, SHEET 29.3.SEE SEWER & WATER PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

INSTALL CONCRETE COLD JOINT PER CITY STD. C-341INSTALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STD. C-42INSTALL DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. C-2434INSTALL MEDIAN CURB PER CITY STD. C-85INSTALL DRAINAGE INLET PER CITY STD. D-126INSTALL STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PER CITY STD. D-17INSTALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER CITY STD. S-18TIE-INTO EXIST. MANHOLE9INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT PER CITY STD. W-1 325.19TCBLDBLD
323.98BSW 324.09BSW 324.32BSW
324.73BSW 324.66BSW
324.60BSW 324.59BSW 324.71BSW 324.79BSW 325.03BSW 324.79BSW 324.85BSW 325.14BSW 325.01BSW 326.31BSW
326.23BSW 326.16BSW
325.18BSW 325.07BSW 325.06BSW 325.20BSW 324.97BSW 325.25BSW 324.96BSW 324.91BSW 324.90BSW
324.44BSW 324.45BSW
324.76BSW 324.86BSW 324.28BSW
323.42BSW
CBOX
CBOXCBOXCBOX 323.68DI323.75DI323.78DI
326.50FNC325.67FNC
323.72CR324.42CR324.96CR
324.52CR
324.98CR325.00CR325.00CR325.05CR325.25CR325.19CR325.15CR325.19CR325.17CR325.21CR325.29CR325.38CR325.41CR325.45CR 324.30CR 324.64CR 324.85CR
325.20CR324.92CR324.58CR324.47CR
323.57CR
EE
323.92EP324.27EP324.61EP324.95EP325.26EP325.21EP325.17EP325.20EP325.38EP325.22EP325.04EP 323.10FL323.48FL323.66FL323.93FL324.06FL324.17FL
324.07FL324.07FL
324.10FL324.14FL324.22FL324.31FL324.27FL324.29FL324.38FL324.45FL324.50FL 324.62FL
324.63FL324.49FL324.17FL324.33FL
324.55FL
324.26FL324.34FL
324.41FL324.33FL
324.60FL
324.37FL324.32FL324.32FL
324.33FL324.31FL323.94FL323.71FL323.60FL
323.62FL
323.45
324.07FL323.81FL323.50FL
323.10FL
322.78FL
324.57FNC
324.76FNC
325.61FNC
326.00BSW
326.32BSW
326.06BSW 325.99BSW
324.91BSW 324.92BSW 325.13BSW 325.32BSW 325.10BSW 325.01BSW 324.84BSW
324.36BSW 324.36BSW
324.72BSW 324.79BSW
323.37BSW
323.23LIP323.60LIP323.78LIP324.05LIP324.25LIP
324.08LIP
324.20LIP324.19LIP
324.21LIP324.22LIP324.29LIP324.38LIP324.45LIP324.41LIP324.51LIP324.66LIP324.60LIP 324.78LIP
324.71LIP324.59LIP324.33LIP324.47LIP
324.66LIP
324.34LIP324.47LIP
324.59LIP324.42LIP
324.72LIP324.77LIP324.74LIP324.43LIP
324.46LIP324.44LIP323.92LIP323.87LIP323.68LIP
323.77LIP
323.64
324.24LIP323.92LIP323.62LIP
323.24LIP
322.92LIP
LTE
LTE
LTE
325.40OG
325.42OG
325.86OG
325.48OG
325.39OG324.11OG
325.14OG
325.18OG
325.42OG 324.69OG
323.34OG
323.11OG
323.01OG323.18OG 323.23OG 323.09OG
323.18OG322.91OG323.06OG
323.24OG 323.19OG 323.25OG
323.68OG323.82OG324.37OG
323.82OG323.90OG324.70OG325.20OG325.30OG325.16OG325.18OG325.09OG 325.75OG325.03OG
PPPP
PP
PP
PPPPPP
324.97EP

SHRUBSHRUB
324.31SSMHRIM
323.61TC323.95TC324.13TC324.38TC324.19TC324.65TC
324.53TC
324.53TC
324.52TC324.27TC324.61TC324.80TC324.76TC324.66TC324.82TC324.96TC324.93TC 325.48TC325.35TC325.29TC325.18TC
325.19TC
325.27TC326.26TC326.03TC
326.00TC
325.22TC325.30TC
325.33TC 325.27TC325.32TC325.30TC
325.36TC325.46TC325.36TC325.26TC325.32TC325.10TC325.03TC325.03TC325.30TC325.29TC325.30TC 325.74TC325.45TC325.41TC325.37TC325.31TC 324.61TC325.05TC
324.99TC324.93TC324.59TC324.82TC
325.04TC
324.76TC324.77TC
324.86TC324.80TC325.07TC325.24TC325.08TC325.20TC325.00TC 325.24TC325.22TC
324.77TC
326.05TC326.04TC326.04TC325.86TC
324.79TC324.72TC
325.69TC325.93TC325.76TC325.66TC325.62TC325.58TC325.37TC325.51TC325.27TC325.25TC325.30TC325.38TC 324.34TC324.18TC324.07TC
324.11TC
323.93
324.57TC324.27TC323.95TC
323.56TC
323.27TC
TELPED
TELPED
TREE

TREETREETREETREETREETREETREETREETREETREETREETREETREETREE TREE
TREE

TREETREETREE

TREETREETREETREETREETREETREETREE
TREE

TREETREETREETREETREETREE

TREETREE VP

WM WMWM WV
WVWV
INV 8"N/S(317.07)
(E) 18'' SD(E) 18'' SD(E) 18'' SD
(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH 24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS24'' SS (E) SS
(E) SS
(E) SS
(E) COMCAST-UG
(E) COMCAST-UG(E) COMCAST-UG
(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN (E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN (E) GAS
(E) GAS
(E) GAS
(E) GAS
(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS (E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG
(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG (E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W
(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W (E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 6'' W DI 323.48
SSMHRIM 324.55
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+0018'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD 6'' SS 6'' SSINSTALL 360 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000 INSTALL 436 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000 INSTALL 52 LF OF 12" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000 INSTALL 51 LF OF 12" SD PIPE @ S=-6.3666INV. 18" E 304.39INV. 18" W 304.29RIM: 324.72STA: 11+95.47, 21.66' LTINSTALL SDMH INV. 12" N 304.99INV. 18" W 304.39INV. 18" E 316.48RIM: 325.45STA: 15+56.62, 17.91' LTINSTALL SDMH INV. 12" N 324.29INV. 18" E 316.58INV. 18" W 316.48RIM: 326.29STA: 19+92.12, 15.99' LTINSTALL SDMH INV. 12" S 304.99STA: 15+58.61, 70.25' LTINSTALL SD STUB INV. 12" S -0.50STA: 19+92.12, 67.00' LTINSTALL SD STUB INSTALL 93 LF OF 6" SD PIPE @ S=0.0050
INV. 24" E 305.88INV. 24" W 305.57INV. 6" N 305.57RIM: 325.23STA: 15+65.10, 23.01' RTINSTALL SSMH INV. 6" S 306.04STA: 15+68.33, 69.99' LTINSTALL SS STUB INV. 24" E 307.41INV. 24" W 305.88INV. 6" N 305.88RIM: 324.76STA: 20+02.12, 21.86' RTINSTALL SSMH INSTALL 89 LF OF 6" SD PIPE @ S=0.0050
INV. 6" S 306.32STA: 20+02.12, 67.00' LTINSTALL SS STUB SEE DETAIL R-5, SHEET 24.

SEE DETAIL DA-3, SHEET 26.

SEE DETAIL DA-2, SHEET 28.

SEE DETAIL DA-1, SHEET 28.

TC 325.53P 325.03STA: 15+94.98, 45.00' LTGB TC 324.71FL 324.21STA: 19+71.13, 45.00' LTGB

1.9%2.4%2.4%2.4%

1.7%

2.1% 2.3% 2.2% 2.9% 2.4% 1.6%

1.9%

2.5%
P (324.12)MATCH EXIST.STA: 11+75.38, 43.23' RT
P (324.26)MATCH EXIST.STA: 11+74.86, 42.87' LT
P (325.02)MATCH EXIST.STA: 11+74.74, 3.14' RT
6 6 7
INSTALL 206 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
R1.50'R2495.00'
TC 326.13P 325.63STA: 15+59.99, 8.45' LTEC
76TC 325.75P 325.25STA: 13+28.24, 9.00' RTBC TC 326.01P 325.51STA: 14+48.24, 7.00' LTEC TC 325.88P 325.38STA: 13+10.29, 3.00' RTBC
TC 325.75P 325.25STA: 13+48.24, 8.00' RTPCC TC 325.77P 325.27STA: 13+68.24, 5.00' RTPRC TC 325.92P 325.42STA: 13+50.43, 0.01' RTPCC
TC 326.01P 325.51STA: 15+03.21, 8.56' LTEC
TC 325.97P 325.47STA: 13+90.48, 6.04' LTPRC
P (325.58)MATCH EXIST.STA: 11+74.74, 3.91' RT
TC 325.82P 324.99MATCH EXIST.STA: 11+75.20, 9.20' RT
TC 326.07P 325.57STA: 15+26.23, 5.00' RTBC
TC 325.72P 325.22STA: 14+91.70, 5.00' RTEC
TC 325.66P 325.16STA: 14+91.53, 7.99' RTBC
TC 325.98P 325.48STA: 17+47.15, 9.00' RTBC TC 325.99P 325.49STA: 17+67.15, 8.07' RTPCC TC 326.04P 325.54STA: 17+87.15, 5.25' RTEC
TC 326.08P 325.58STA: 18+27.15, 2.25' LTBC
TC 325.78P 325.28STA: 19+40.65, 6.00' LTBC TC 325.71P 325.21STA: 19+40.65, 9.00' LTEC

18.00'
1 1
1 S=0.0034 S=0.0022 S=0.0047
324.52325.25
R1.50'R1.50'
TC 325.49P 324.99STA: 19+25.48, 7.99' RTBCTC 325.98P 325.48STA: 18+46.98, 5.07' LTEC TC 325.54P 325.04STA: 19+25.65, 5.00' RTEC
TC 325.63P 325.13STA: 19+60.15, 5.00' RTBC TC 325.44P 324.94STA: 19+94.28, 8.46' LTEC TC 325.44P 324.94STA: 20+06.58, 8.46' RTEC
TC 325.26P 324.76STA: 20+40.71, 5.00' LTBCTC 325.14P 324.64STA: 20+60.21, 9.00' RTBCTC 325.20P 324.70STA: 20+60.21, 6.00' RTEC TC 324.83P 324.33STA: 20+75.21, 8.00' LTEC
R1.50'
TC 324.83P 324.33STA: 21+73.71, 2.25' RTEC
TC 324.89P 324.39STA: 21+53.71, 5.06' RTPCC
TC 324.87P 324.37STA: 20+75.21, 5.00' LTBC
TC 324.94P 324.44STA: 21+33.71, 6.00' RTBC
INV. 6" N 305.57INV. 24" E 305.20
RIM: 325.23STA: 15+65.10, 23.01' RTINSTALL SSMH
EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0011EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0011 RIM: 323.99STA: 10+08.74, 11.08' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" E 304.59
RIM: 324.76STA: 20+02.12, 21.86' RTINSTALL SSMH
INV. 24" W 305.68INV. 6" N 305.88INV. 24" E 305.68
EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0011
RIM: 325.45STA: 15+56.62, 17.91' LTINSTALL SDMH6 7RIM: 324.72STA: 11+95.47, 21.66' LTINSTALL SDMH6RIM: 324.60STA: 10+75.79, 21.85' LTINSTALL SDMH6 INV. 18" W 310.79
INSTALL 120 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0066
INSTALL 360 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0020
INV. 18" W 311.51
INV. 24" W 305.20
INSTALL 436 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0015
6 INV. 18" E 312.16
INSTALL 206 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0015
7 EXIST. 8" WATER PIPE
INV. 18" W 312.16
INV. 18" E 310.79INV. 18" N 310.00INV. 18" E 310.00
INV. 12" N 304.99
INV. 18" E 312.49
RIM: 324.79STA: 19+92.12, 15.99' LTINSTALL SDMHPROPOSED GRADE @ CENTERLINEEXISTING GRADE @ CENTERLINE

IMROVEMENT PLAN
MATCHLINE STA: 22+00SEE SHEET 8
10+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0017+0018+0019+0020+0021+00 312310308306
DRW BY: MHCHK BY: KM
CITY OF VISALIA315 E. ACEQUIA AVE.

RIGGIN AVENUEWIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS
VISALIA, CA 93291
PREPARED BY:

FAX: 559.802.3215TEL: 559.802.3052VISALIA, CA 93292324 S. SANTA FE, STE. AP.O. BOX 7593 Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R
NORTH
0' 40'40' 0'VERTICAL SCALE
2'

NOT FORCONSTRUCTION
22+00304
314316318320322324326
312310308306304
314316318320322324326
107
(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS (E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS (E) SD
(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS (E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS 324.55EP324.55EP324.53EP324.64EP324.64EP
323.20LIP323.15FL323.66TC 323.70TC323.20FL323.31LIP 323.39LIP323.30FL323.75TC E 323.45LIP323.29FL323.79TC 323.88TC323.41FL323.45LIP 324.40SDMHRIM
324.13OG323.95OG
324.20OG
323.85OG323.73OG323.88OG
323.70OG324.23OGWV
324.00OG
324.61OGRR
324.05OG323.88OG324.73OG324.57OGR
324.18OG
PP324.56EP324.47OG
323.80OG
324.63EP324.55OGR
323.74OG324.01OG
324.61OG324.66EP324.75EP
324.44OG
323.85OG323.94OG
324.32OG324.76EPPP324.34OG
324.02OG
161.73SSMHRIM
323.48TC323.02FL323.16LIPWM323.50TC323.06FL323.19LIP 323.54TC323.11FL323.30LIPWM323.68TC323.16FL323.23LIP WM323.22LIP323.22FL WM INV 18"E/W(306.65)
322.87BSW
322.98BSW
CBOX
322.79DI322.69DI
322.02DI322.08DI
324.56CR
323.64CR
324.42CR324.35CR324.25CR324.04CR323.92CR323.81CR323.81CR323.72CR323.71CR323.62CR323.57CR 322.92CR
324.91EP324.82EP324.77EP324.49EP324.32EP324.28EP324.17EP324.11EP324.04EP324.09EP324.00EP323.91EP323.86EP FH
FH 323.02FL
323.13FL322.97FL
323.01FL322.92FL
322.86FL322.60FL
323.20FL323.10FL
322.92FL322.83FL322.82FL322.76FL322.76FL322.64FL322.53FL322.64FL322.53FL322.44FL322.36FL322.38FL322.17FL322.18FL322.08FL 322.17FL
322.32FL322.32FL
322.22FL
322.38FL322.62FL322.83FL
323.54FNC323.57FNC
323.54FNC323.08FNC323.70FNC
322.96FNCGUY 323.13LIP
323.24LIP323.10LIP
323.06LIP323.08LIP
323.01LIP322.69LIP
323.34LIP
323.22LIP
323.02LIP322.90LIP322.92LIP322.87LIP322.79LIP322.72LIP322.62LIP322.69LIP322.61LIP322.50LIP322.41LIP322.45LIP322.32LIP322.26LIP322.21LIP322.30LIP 322.41LIP322.41LIP
322.32LIP
322.47LIP322.67LIP322.88LIP
323.30OG 323.40OG 323.43OG 323.33OG 323.55OG 323.47OG 323.47OG 323.55OG 323.44OG 323.68OG 323.68OG 323.67OG 323.72OG 323.69OG 323.66OG323.61OG323.72OG323.53OG323.72OG323.58OG323.62OG323.39OG323.36OG323.46OG323.48OG323.39OG323.35OG323.32OG 323.48OG 323.47OG 323.47OG 323.57OG 323.54OG 323.37OG 323.58OG 323.59OG 323.28OG 323.67OG 323.62OG 323.83OG 323.98OG 324.06OG 323.83OG324.42OG324.40OG324.39OG323.84OG324.14OG324.24OG324.13OG324.25OG324.24OG324.16OG324.11OG324.20OG323.92OG324.16OG324.06OG 324.16OG324.18OG324.20OG
323.90OG324.05OG323.98OG
323.95OG323.86OG324.19OG324.03OG
323.95OG324.12OG
323.95OG
323.72OG

PPPPPP PPPP
PP
R

SHRUBSHRUB
323.86SSMHRIM
323.96SSMHRIM
323.46SSMHRIM323.68SSMHRIM
324.64SSMHRIM
323.55TC323.45TC323.57TC323.58TC323.54TC
323.56TC323.54TC
323.41TC
323.46TC323.39TC
323.36TC322.99TC323.31TC323.28TC323.21TC323.22TC323.12TC323.02TC323.01TC323.00TC322.89TC322.80TC322.80TC322.64TC322.69TC322.66TC322.58TC 322.67TC
322.76TC322.76TC
322.67TC
322.82TC323.07TC
322.65TC323.28TC
TELPED

TELPED TREE

TREETREETREETREETREETREETREESPIGOTWMWV

WVWVWV WVWV

WVWVWVWVWVWVWV
INV 8"N/S(315.70)INV 8"E(315.79)
INV 24"E/W(306.38)
BOTTOM 318.61
(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS
INV 8"S(315.69)INV 8"S(307.17)INV 24"E/W(305.96)INV 8"N/S(315.70)INV 8"E(315.79) INV 12"E/W/S(319.55)
INV 12"W(319.54)
INV 12"E(320.13)
INV 24"E/W(306.38)
BOTTOM 318.61
INV 24"E/W(306.10)
(E) SD
(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH (E) E-OH
(E) E-OH
24'' SS
(E) COMCAST-UG (E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) GAS(E) GAS (E) GAS
(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS (E) AT&T-UG
(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG (E) 8'' W
(E) 8'' W
(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W SDMHRIM 322.89
INV 8" E(316.76)
23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD 18'' SD18'' SD
INSTALL 29 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
INV. 18" N 318.17INV. 18" W 316.58INV. 18" E 316.68RIM: 323.52STA: 22+54.03, 16.33' LTINSTALL SDMH INSTALL 25 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000INV. 18" N 316.88INV. 18" W 316.78INV. 18" SW 317.98RIM: 322.76STA: 29+02.67, 19.99' LTINSTALL SDMHINV. 18" W 316.68INV. 18" E 316.78RIM: 323.01STA: 25+78.53, 19.99' LTINSTALL SDMH INSTALL 324 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
INV. 18" E 318.14INV. 18" NE 317.98
STA: 28+50.56, 47.80' RTINSTALL DITC 323.83FL 323.33
INSTALL 86 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
INV. 18" W 318.14
STA: 29+50.43, 47.38' RTINSTALL DITC 323.98FL 323.48
INV. 18" S 318.17
STA: 22+53.53, 45.00' LTINSTALL DITC 323.38FL 322.88
INV. 18" S 316.88
STA: 29+02.67, 45.00' LTINSTALL DITC 322.08FL 321.58
SEE DETAIL R-1, SHEET 28.

SEE DETAIL R-2, SHEET 28.

SEE DETAIL B-1, SHEET 28. SEE DETAIL B-2, SHEET 28.

3.0%3.0%1.9%1.9%2.3%

2.5% 1.7%

2.1% 1.3%

1.6%

1.3%

1.2%

1.6%

3.3%

2.5%

6.0%

2.4%
STA: 25+81.66, 50.85' RTINSTALL FHINSTALL 18 LF OF 6" WATER PIPE STA: 32+27.05, 50.90' RTINSTALL FH18 LF OF 6" WATER PIPE INSTALL 52 LF OF 18" Ø SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
6 6
9 6
9P (323.03)MATCH EXIST.STA: 22+84.71, 42.99' RT
P (322.38)MATCH EXIST.STA: 22+86.37, 77.05' RT
TC 324.18P 323.43STA: 23+23.49, 2.44' LT
P (324.03)MATCH EXIST.STA: 33+23.87, 32.00' RT
P (323.39)MATCH EXIST.STA: 33+24.02, 45.88' RT
P (324.53)MATCH EXIST.STA: 33+23.78, 1.55' RTP (324.23)MATCH EXIST.STA: 33+23.85, 24.00' RT STA: 25+81.66, 50.85' RTINSTALL FH
EXIST. FHSTA: 22+29.57, 52.07' RT
TC 323.52FL 322.77STA: 23+43.37, 28.70' RT
TC 323.71P 323.21STA: 25+21.47, 15.00' LTECTC 323.92P 323.42STA: 23+98.60, 3.75' LTBC

12.00'
TC 324.98P 324.48STA: 31+83.95, 4.22' LTEC
TC 324.95P 324.45STA: 31+68.69, 3.00' LTBC TC 325.08P 324.58STA: 32+49.01, 12.00' LTBC TC 325.12P 324.62STA: 32+69.01, 14.25' LTEC

12.00'
S=0.0033S=0.0020
323.59323.66323.90324.03324.21 5
5 5
5 TC 322.58FL 322.08STA: 22+90.53, 76.85' RT
TC 324.09P 323.34STA: 23+06.96, 13.03' LT
R209.91'R1500.00'

2.00'
INSTALL 77 LF OF 18" Ø SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
EXIST. FHSTA: 28+79.50, 81.52' RT
DETAIL REFERENCEEXIST. ASPHALT CONCRETE(NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)EXIST. CONCRETEPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED ASPHALT CONCRETESTAMPED MEDIAN (C-35) LEGENDCONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY)GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:1.ALL SAWCUTS TO BE A NEAT, CLEAN, ON GRADE EDGE.2.ALL NEW CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DOWELED INTO EXIST.CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PER CITY STD. C-34, SHEET 29.3.SEE SEWER & WATER PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

INSTALL CONCRETE COLD JOINT PER CITY STD. C-341INSTALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STD. C-42INSTALL DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. C-2434INSTALL MEDIAN CURB PER CITY STD. C-85INSTALL DRAINAGE INLET PER CITY STD. D-126INSTALL STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PER CITY STD. D-17INSTALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER CITY STD. S-18TIE-INTO EXIST. MANHOLE9INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT PER CITY STD. W-1 RIM: 323.42STA: 22+57.75, 19.85' RTEXIST. SSMH
RIM: 323.19STA: 22+57.49, 32.14' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" W 305.96INV. 24" E 305.96
INV. 8" N 315.70INV. 8" S 315.79INV. 8" E 315.79
EXIST. 8" SS PIPE @ S=0.0030
RIM: 323.06STA: 27+30.97, 29.18' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 8" S 319.10
INV. 8" W 317.21
RIM: 323.17STA: 25+82.92, 14.46' RTEXIST. SSMH
EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0004
INV. 24" W 306.10INV. 24" E 306.10
EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0009
RIM: 323.45STA: 29+08.41, 15.23' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" W 306.38INV. 24" E 306.38EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0008 RIM: 323.67STA: 30+50.62, 20.94' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 8" E 316.76INV. 4" S 316.76
RIM: 323.97STA: 32+19.98, 14.69' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" W 306.62INV. 24" E 306.62EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0008 RIM: 322.76STA: 29+02.67, 19.99' LTINSTALL SDMH
INSTALL 324 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0015
RIM: 323.01STA: 25+78.53, 19.99' LTINSTALL SDMH
INV. 18" W 313.03INV. 18" E 313.02
INSTALL 324 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0015
6 STA: 28+50.56, 47.80' RTEXIST. DITC ???FL ???
6 EXIST. 8" SS PIPE @ S=0.0033
INV. 18" E 312.54INV. 18" W 312.54
RIM: 323.52STA: 22+54.03, 16.33' LTINSTALL SDMH6
EXIST. 12" WATER PIPE
EXISTING GRADE @ CENTERLINEPROPOSED GRADE @ CENTERLINE
INV. 18" W 313.51INV. 18" SW 313.74

IMROVEMENT PLAN
MATCHLINE STA: 34+00SEE SHEET 9
22+0023+0024+0025+0026+0027+0028+0029+0030+0031+0032+0033+00 DRW BY: MHCHK BY: KM
CITY OF VISALIA315 E. ACEQUIA AVE.

RIGGIN AVENUEWIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS
VISALIA, CA 93291
PREPARED BY:

FAX: 559.802.3215TEL: 559.802.3052VISALIA, CA 93292324 S. SANTA FE, STE. AP.O. BOX 7593 Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R
NORTH
0' 40'40' 0'VERTICAL SCALE
2'

NOT FORCONSTRUCTION
34+00
MATCHLINE STA: 22+00SEE SHEET 7
326324322
314312310308
318320
316
306
326324322
314312310308
318320
316
306
108
(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS (E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS (E) 24'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS (E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS (E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS (E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS
(E) 8'' SS(E) 8'' SS
(E) 10'' SS(E) 10'' SS(E) 10'' SS
(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS (E) 15'' SS(E) 15'' SS
(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS
324.50CR324.06EP
324.16EP324.62CR
324.70CR324.69CR
324.24LIP324.13FL324.60TC
324.00LIP323.91FL324.41TC
323.80LIP323.62FL324.19TC323.78LIP323.83LIP323.82LIP323.81FL324.26TC324.21TC323.67FL324.17TCCBOXCBOX 324.30BSW 324.34BSW 324.42BSW 324.47BSW 324.76BSWCBOXCBOXSIGNAL
SIGNAL323.79EP
324.52CR324.57CR
323.80EP 323.72EP 323.89EP 324.14EP 324.10EP 324.10EP 324.13EP324.23EP324.71EP324.26FNC 324.92FNC325.04EP 325.26EP 325.22EP 325.24EP 325.32EP 325.31EP325.46EP 325.58EP 325.45EP 325.52EP 325.38EP 325.36EP 325.41EP CBOXCBOX324.14EPCBOX
EEEECBOX324.59TC324.14FL324.27LIP324.67TCLTE323.97TC323.98TC323.95FL324.02LIP323.96TCCBOXCBOXCBOX324.27TC324.20TC323.74FL323.89LIP323.65TC323.67TC323.66FL323.72LIP323.64TC324.11OG324.33OG324.19OG324.00OG323.88OGE323.99TC323.56FL323.66LIP323.54LIP323.48FL323.95TCLTECBOXCBOX323.73EP323.66EP 324.74SDMHRIM323.85FNC 324.48FNC
324.54EP324.47EP324.54EP 324.59SSMHRIM
324.56SSMHRIM
324.41EP324.58EP324.55
323.88323.41323.45LIP 323.39LIP323.34FL323.73TC 323.95TC323.39FL323.64LIPCBOXCBOX324.06TC323.54FL323.69LIPLTE323.92TC324.08TC323.55TC323.60TC323.57FL323.62LIP323.64LIP324.16TCBOL323.61TC323.96TC 324.35CR323.66LIP323.54FL323.94TC324.08TCLTECBOXCBOXFH323.99TC323.56FL323.51FL323.33FL323.44DI323.69LIP323.65LIP 323.78LIP323.67FL324.10TC 324.29CR324.28CRWM323.64LIP323.44FL323.84TC323.63TC323.45FL323.37LIP323.44LIP323.27FL323.26FL323.76TC323.41LIP323.38LIP323.23FL323.28FL323.59LIP323.84TC323.86WALLCBOXCBOX325.11WALL325.25WALL323.55SDMHRIMLTE324.01TC323.52FL323.60LIP325.19WALL325.26WALLBOL323.56TC323.58TC323.47FL323.61LIP323.58TC325.38WALL325.40WALL324.09TCLTE324.20TC323.68FL323.86LIP323.80LIP323.74FL324.23TCCBOXCBOX325.43WALL 324.26WALL324.17TC323.78FL323.92LIP 323.86LIP323.72FL324.11TC 324.20TC323.86FL323.96LIP 324.29TC323.86FL323.94LIPWM 324.06LIP323.94FL324.34TCWM324.27TC323.85FL324.05LIP 324.02LIP323.94FL324.28TC 325.10SSMHRIM
324.43TC324.05FL324.13LIP
INV 8"E(315.11)INV 8"S(315.10)INV 8"W(315.17)
INV 10"N(308.02)INV 15"S(307.41)INV 18"E(306.87)INV 18"W(306.83) INV 18"N(314.29)
INV 18"E/W(307.46)
324.59OGCBOX 323.79OG324.53OG
325.96SSMHRIM
325.82SSMHRIM
WM
324.11TC323.59FL323.72LIP324.55CR323.84LIP323.73FL324.18TC TREE
326.01OG325.78OG325.69OG325.37OG325.20OG324.98OG324.69OG324.50OG324.51OG PPR R325.35OG
324.88OG
PP
GUYGUY
324.64OG325.09OGR 325.23EP325.24OG
324.75OGR R R324.87OG325.50OG325.44EP
PP324.90OG325.24OG325.41EP 325.10EP
325.06OG325.04OG 325.12OG325.29OG325.44EP 325.43EP325.51OG325.16OG 325.34OG325.54OG325.65EP PP
324.61TC324.26FL324.41LIP324.64TC324.25FL324.39LIP324.61TC324.18FL324.36LIP324.57TC324.17FL324.25LIPWV324.62TC323.97FL324.21LIP325.18CR324.58TC324.15FL324.29LIP 324.63TC324.22FL324.34LIP324.56TC324.13FL324.28LIP
326.03CR
324.60TC324.18FL324.28LIP324.55TC324.12FL324.21LIP
325.91CR
324.50TC324.12FL324.27LIP
325.80CR
WM324.45TC324.07FL324.25LIP
325.79CR
WMWMPP
FH
325.57EP325.00DI321.57FL325.47OG 325.48OG325.78EP 325.82EP 325.47OG 325.66OG325.90EP 326.04EP
325.75OG PP325.75OG325.92EP 325.82EP
325.66OGWV
324.81TC324.40FL324.48LIP 324.79TC
325.85SSMHRIM324.89TC324.49FL324.60LIP 324.90TC324.52FL324.57LIP324.90TC324.45FL324.52LIPWM324.96TC324.58FL324.68LIP 326.46SSMHRIM
WM325.09TC324.66FL324.75LIP 325.04TC324.57FL324.71LIP
INV 8"E/W(318.36)INV 6"S(318.66)
INV 18"E(307.73)INV 18"W(317.63)
INV 8"E/W(316.62)
(E) 18'' SD

PP PP(E) E-OH (E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH (E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH (E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS (E) GAS(E) GAS
(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS (E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG
(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG (E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG
(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W
(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W
(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W (E) 12'' W
(E) 8'' W
(E) 8'' W
35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 18'' SD
18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD
W
W
SEE DETAIL B-3, SHEET 28.

TC (323.98)FL (323.48)MATCH EXIST.STA: 34+74.38, 45.08' LT S=0.00333.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.2% 2.2%

2.6%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%
STA: 38+70.79, 48.89' RTINSTALL FH
88 LF OF 6" WATER PIPE STA: 42+16.83, 86.36' RTINSTALL FH 6 LF OF 6" WATER PIPE STA: 45+00.82, 49.04' RTINSTALL FH 88 LF OF 6" WATER PIPE
TC 325.57P 325.07STA: 37+96.13, 3.75' LTBC
P (324.50)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+72.77, 5.75' LT
9 9
6 P (324.23)MATCH EXIST.STA: 34+95.86, 24.00' RT
P (324.43)MATCH EXIST.STA: 34+89.41, 17.00' LTP (324.49)MATCH EXIST.STA: 34+89.41, 12.25' LT P (323.93)MATCH EXIST.STA: 34+97.38, 36.07' RT P (324.56)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+72.77, 1.00' LT P (324.26)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+69.86, 23.00' RT
P (324.13)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+69.86, 31.00' RT
P (324.49)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+98.30, 5.75' LT
P (324.13)MATCH EXIST.STA: 39+53.55, 44.09' RTP (325.15)MATCH EXIST.STA: 39+53.71, 31.00' RT TC 325.57P 325.07STA: 38+16.13, 6.00' LTECTC 325.58P 325.08STA: 38+56.13, 12.00' LTBC TC 325.59P 325.09STA: 38+96.13, 15.00' LTEC
R275.51'
TC 326.51P 326.01STA: 45+24.97, 3.00' LTBC
TC 326.64P 326.14STA: 45+64.97, 6.00' LTEC
INSTALL 292 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
INV. 18" E 315.60INV. 18" W 315.50RIM: 326.11STA: 45+12.95, 21.00' LTINSTALL SDMH INSTALL 85 LF OF18" Ø SD PIPE @ S=0.0011326.57326.54 326.43326.22326.14326.06325.98325.90325.82325.74325.66325.58325.66325.74325.82325.90325.98326.06326.14326.24326.31326.39326.47326.55326.63 TC (324.31)FL (323.81)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+98.27, 45.09' LT P (323.82)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+98.30, 43.10' LT
TC 324.59FL 324.09STA: 37+92.70, 45.00' LTGC
P (325.52)MATCH EXIST.STA: 39+53.47, 1.00' LT
P (324.48)MATCH EXIST.STA: 34+72.06, 12.25' LT
P (324.54)MATCH EXIST.STA: 34+71.16, 0.37' LT
P (324.02)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+16.94, 50.89' RTP (324.22)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+22.10, 47.55' RT P (324.18)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+16.16, 37.46' RT
P (323.95)MATCH EXIST.STA: 35+01.51, 37.61' RT
P (325.66)MATCH EXIST.STA: 39+53.71, 23.00' RT

12.00'
INSTALL 99 LF OF 18" Ø SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
TC 325.58P 325.08STA: 38+76.13, 14.25' LTBC
SEE DETAIL R-4, SHEET 28.INSTALL 36 LF OF 18" Ø SD PIPE @ S=0.0000 INV. 18" E 315.50INV. 18" SW 288.02RIM: 325.56STA: 42+20.52, 20.99' LTINSTALL SDMH6 9INV. 18" NE 288.02
STA: 41+72.67, 79.46' RTINSTALL DITC 324.30FL 323.805 EXIST. FHSTA: 35+07.36, 86.32' RT
TC 325.06FL 324.56STA: 39+74.55, 45.00' LTGC
DETAIL REFERENCEEXIST. ASPHALT CONCRETE(NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)EXIST. CONCRETEPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED ASPHALT CONCRETESTAMPED MEDIAN (C-35) LEGENDCONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY)GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:1.ALL SAWCUTS TO BE A NEAT, CLEAN, ON GRADE EDGE.2.ALL NEW CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DOWELED INTO EXIST.CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PER CITY STD. C-34, SHEET 29.3.SEE SEWER & WATER PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

INSTALL CONCRETE COLD JOINT PER CITY STD. C-341INSTALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STD. C-42INSTALL DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. C-2434INSTALL MEDIAN CURB PER CITY STD. C-85INSTALL DRAINAGE INLET PER CITY STD. D-126INSTALL STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PER CITY STD. D-17INSTALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER CITY STD. S-18TIE-INTO EXIST. MANHOLE9INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT PER CITY STD. W-1 RIM: 324.32STA: 35+28.02, 20.73' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 8" S 315.10
INV. 8" W 315.17INV. 8" E 315.11
RIM: 324.38STA: 35+37.95, 15.16' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" W 306.87INV. 24" E 306.87INV. 10" N 308.02INV. 15" S 307.41 EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0019 EXIST. 8" SS PIPE @ S=0.0030
RIM: 324.91STA: 38+65.77, 15.58' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" W 307.46INV. 24" E 307.46
RIM: 324.90STA: 40+27.21, 20.99' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 8" E 316.62INV. 8" W 316.62
EXIST. 8" SS PIPE @ S=0.0036
RIM: 325.24STA: 41+98.86, 14.71' RTEXIST. SSMH
EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0009
RIM: 325.04STA: 43+52.15, 25.19' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 8" W 317.79INV. 8" E 317.79
EXIST. 8" SS PIPE @ S=0.0036
RIM: 325.50STA: 45+19.44, 14.58' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" W 308.02
INV. 24" W 307.63
EXIST. 12" WATER PIPE
EXIST. 12" WATER PIPE
INV. 6" S 318.66
INV. 24" E 318.36
EXISTING GRADE @ CENTERLINEPROPOSED GRADE @ CENTERLINERIM: 325.56STA: 42+20.52, 20.99' LTINSTALL SDMH6 INSTALL 292 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=-0.0011
RIM: 326.11STA: 45+12.95, 21.00' LTINSTALL SDMH
INV. 18" E 316.47 INV. 18" W 316.15
INV. 18" E 316.15
INSTALL 101 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=-0.0011
INSTALL 85 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=-0.0011

IMROVEMENT PLAN
MATCHLINE STA: 46+00SEE SHEET 10
34+0035+0036+0037+0038+0039+0040+0041+0042+0043+0044+0045+00 DRW BY: MHCHK BY: KM
CITY OF VISALIA315 E. ACEQUIA AVE.

RIGGIN AVENUEWIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS
VISALIA, CA 93291
PREPARED BY:

FAX: 559.802.3215TEL: 559.802.3052VISALIA, CA 93292324 S. SANTA FE, STE. AP.O. BOX 7593 Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R
NORTH
0' 40'40' 0'VERTICAL SCALE
2'

NOT FORCONSTRUCTION
46+00
MATCHLINE STA: 34+00SEE SHEET 8
322320
312310308306
318
314
324326
316
328
322320
312310308306
318
314
324326
316
328
109
(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS (E) 8'' SS
(E) 18'' SD
(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 24'' SS(E) 8'' SS
327.17SSMHRIM327.13CR326.86FL326.99LIP326.99LIP326.92FL326.98FL 327.10LIP327.01FL327.50TC 327.43TC327.02FL327.11LIP327.22CR327.44TC327.01FL327.08LIP327.50TC 327.08BSW327.54TC 327.12BSW327.54TC327.53TC327.36TC326.95FL327.05LIPCBOX327.72TC 327.72BSW 327.75BSW327.75TC327.64TC 327.21BSW 327.15BSW327.56TCCBOX CBOXCBOXCBOXCBOXCBOX327.15OG327.26OG327.16TC326.74FL326.85LIP327.10CRLTE326.83OG 327.74OG 328.20OGGUYPP327.12LIP327.01FL327.48TC 327.84BSW 327.88BSWTREE327.53FNC327.87WALL327.84WALL327.26WALL327.26WALL 327.16LIP327.05FL327.52TCLTE 327.95BSW 328.05BSWTREE327.77FNC327.66FNCTREECBOXCBOXCBOXCBOXTREE327.79FNC327.71FNCTREE327.75FNC327.83WALL327.50WALL327.60WALLCBOXCBOXWM327.29LIP327.22FL327.64TC 327.74BSW 327.81BSW327.58OG 327.64OG 327.94BSW 327.89BSWCBOX 327.82BSW 327.76BSW 327.94BSW 328.08BSW 328.13BSW327.74OGCBOXCBOX328.02TC327.97TC327.97TC327.76TC327.75TC327.73TC327.73TC327.24FL327.37LIP327.29FL327.40LIP327.46LIP327.34FL 327.37FL327.53LIP 327.61LIP327.45FL328.10TC 328.17BSW327.80OG 328.24BSW 328.23BSW 328.22BSW 328.20BSW 328.30BSW 328.38BSW 328.32BSW 328.27BSW 328.18BSWCBOX 328.16TC328.13TC328.12TC328.17TC328.22TC328.21TC328.06TC327.60FL327.73LIPLTECBOXCBOXWM327.84LIP327.71FL328.17TCBSWBSW327.61FL327.72LIP327.77LIP327.62FL327.57FL327.73LIP327.45FL327.62LIP 325.84TC325.41FL325.53LIP 326.15BSW 326.23BSW
325.74LIP325.61FL326.05TC 326.34BSW 326.55BSW 326.49BSW 326.38BSW325.81LIP325.70FL326.13TCLTE 325.97LIP325.86FL326.28TC 326.57BSW 326.68BSW 326.80BSW 326.71BSW 326.45TC326.03FL326.16LIP 326.30LIP326.19FL326.61TC 327.06BSW 327.00BSW 327.15BSW 327.01BSW 326.74TC326.30FL326.42LIPLTE 326.54LIP326.41FL326.87TC 327.14BSW 327.24BSW 327.50BSW 327.28BSW 327.02TC326.57FL326.69LIP 326.83LIP326.70FL327.15TC 327.45BSW 327.49BSW 327.00LIP326.89FL327.32TCLTE327.10LIP326.93FL327.41TC 327.54BSW 327.66BSW 327.80BSW 327.70BSW 327.80BSW 327.93BSW 327.90BSW 327.82BSW 327.86BSW 327.96BSW 328.06BSW 327.93BSW 327.95BSW 328.08BSW 327.72TC327.20FL327.34LIP327.31LIP327.16FL327.71TC327.65TC327.12FL327.28LIP327.22LIP327.06FL327.60TC327.18LIP327.02FL327.54TC WMCBOX327.40LIP327.24FL327.78TC 327.86TC327.34FL327.49LIP 327.55LIP327.41FL327.94TC 327.61LIP327.45FL328.00TCLTECBOX327.68LIP327.51FL328.06TC GUY 328.41BSW 328.27BSW 328.24BSW 328.39BSW 328.30BSW 328.15BSW 328.09BSW 328.19BSW 328.16BSW 328.05BSW 328.87TC328.54OG 329.10TC
328.84TCCBOXCBOXCBOXTREE328.72TC328.67TCTREE328.65TCTREE328.63TC328.60TCTREE328.59TCTREE328.57TCTREE328.54TC328.53TCTREE328.51TC328.51TC328.50TC328.38TC328.26TC328.29TC328.31TC328.15TC328.21TC328.21TC328.18TC328.17TC328.16TC328.12TC328.11TC328.07TC328.11TC 328.42TC328.33TC328.34TC328.41TC328.29TC328.40TC
WV
LTEFHCBOX327.17TC326.68FL326.80LIP
326.61LIP326.49FL326.90TC
327.45TC327.05FL327.15LIP327.06LIP326.97FL326.79FL326.94LIP326.78FL327.39TC327.39TC327.37TC 329.18TC329.05TC329.01TC328.89TC 329.14TC329.24TC329.25TC329.24TC 329.25TC329.21TC 329.19TC329.22TC328.74TC328.63TC328.55TC328.46TC328.43TC328.40TC328.36TC328.31TC 327.44TC327.43TC327.42TC327.42TC
327.68SSMHRIM
328.48TC328.41TC328.40TC328.49TC328.48TC328.39TC328.42TC328.38TC328.32TC328.38TC328.30TC328.26TC328.14TC328.14TC328.12TC 327.98TC327.96TC328.12TC
327.97TC327.99TC328.06TC328.01TC328.05TC328.02TC327.94TC327.81TC327.91TC 328.01TC327.83TC327.76TCWV327.74TC327.73TC327.64TC327.54TC327.56TC327.56TC327.43TC327.36TC327.44TC327.61TC327.49TC327.70TC326.80CR 325.70TC325.19FL325.37LIPWM 325.92BSW 326.03BSW 326.03BSW 325.94BSW 325.75TC325.30FL325.47LIP325.77TC325.33FL325.48LIP
325.79LIP325.64FL326.11TC 326.17TC325.73FL325.84LIP 325.87LIP325.76FL326.22TC 326.33TC325.87FL325.99LIPPPGUY 326.10LIP325.99FL326.45TC FH WV
LTECBOXWM326.19LIP326.07FL326.52TC 326.26LIP326.12FL326.60TC 326.64TC326.16FL326.30LIP 326.36LIP326.23FL326.72TC 326.78TC326.31FL326.42LIPPP326.81TC326.34FL326.45LIP LTECBOX 325.69TC325.23FL325.34LIP
325.43TC325.36FL325.46LIP325.88CR
326.79SSMHRIM
326.83CR
325.83OG326.07OG
325.67C325.78C325.71CC325.82C325.84C325.77C325.75C
GUY325.84TC325.36FL325.48LIP325.80CR325.43LIP325.30FL325.73TC325.67SDMHRIM 325.80OG325.87EP
325.90OG 325.89OG PP325.60EP326.00TC325.53FL325.67LIPWV PP325.71TC325.24FL325.25LIP
WM325.02TC324.68FL324.88LIP
326.51SSMHRIM
WM325.19TC324.80FL324.96LIP 325.22TC324.84FL325.02LIP325.32TC324.88FL325.30TC324.90FL324.96LIP325.39TC324.94FL325.28TC324.86FL324.97LIP325.96SSMHRIM325.31SDMHRIM326.49CR 326.57CR 325.67TC325.19FL325.33LIP324.95FL325.01LIP325.23TC324.86FL324.91LIP 324.99DI325.01DI INV 18"W(319.64)

COMCAST
MH
INV 18"E(320.42)
INV 8"N(310.00)INV 8"S(316.17)INV 18"E(308.49)INV 18"W(308.40) INV 6"S(319.11)INV 8"W(318.93)
INV 18"E/W(318.69INV 18"N(315.63)
(E) 8'' SS
(E) 8'' SS
(E) 8'' SS
(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH (E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH (E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH(E) E-OH (E) COMCAST-UG(E) COMCAST-UG(E) COMCAST-UG(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN(E) CVIN (E) GAS
(E) GAS(E) GAS
(E) GAS
(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS(E) GAS (E) GAS
(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG(E) AT&T-UG (E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W
(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W
(E) 8'' W
(E) 8'' W
(E) 8'' W
(E) 8'' W
(E) 6'' W
(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W(E) 12'' W (E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W(E) 8'' W
(E) 8'' W
47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 18'' SD
18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD18'' SD
SEE DETAIL R-3, SHEET 28.

2.4%

2.1%

1.7%

2.8% 3.6%

2.4%
6 P (326.09)MATCH EXIST.STA: 50+37.24, 41.01' LT
P (325.77)MATCH EXIST.STA: 50+34.16, 46.20' RT
P (327.81)MATCH EXIST.STA: 52+46.96, 1.77' LT
P (327.90)MATCH EXIST.STA: 52+46.87, 0.22' RT
TC 326.34FL 325.84GB
TC 326.83P 326.33STA: 46+04.97, 11.25' LTBCTC 326.90P 326.40STA: 46+44.97, 14.25' LTEC P (326.27)MATCH EXIST.STA: 47+94.45, 15.00' LTP (326.26)MATCH EXIST.STA: 47+94.45, 14.25' LT P (325.33)MATCH EXIST.STA: 47+96.58, 34.28' RT
P (324.91)MATCH EXIST.STA: 48+51.04, 64.30' RTP 327.30STA: 50+35.36, 12.24' RTBC TC 327.04P 326.54STA: 48+70.54, 1.72' LTBC
TC 327.36FL 326.86STA: 49+63.34, 8.56' RTPCCTC 327.05P 326.55STA: 49+11.29, 5.63' RTEC P (327.28)MATCH EXIST.STA: 50+35.75, 1.09' RT
INSTALL 225 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=0.0000
INV. 18" N 315.70INV. 18" W 315.60RIM: 326.33STA: 48+27.21, 21.00' LTINSTALL SDMH INSTALL 63 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=-0.0011326.71
326.85326.97326.91
P (325.51)MATCH EXIST.STA: 47+96.18, 25.00' RT
P (327.27)MATCH EXIST.STA: 51+19.06, 7.76' LT
8 INV. 18" S 315.63RIM: 325.67STA: 48+26.92, 84.31' LTINSTALL SSMH6 DETAIL REFERENCEEXIST. ASPHALT CONCRETE(NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)EXIST. CONCRETEPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED ASPHALT CONCRETESTAMPED MEDIAN (C-35) LEGENDCONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY)GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:1.ALL SAWCUTS TO BE A NEAT, CLEAN, ON GRADE EDGE.2.ALL NEW CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DOWELED INTO EXIST.CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PER CITY STD. C-34, SHEET 29.3.SEE SEWER & WATER PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

INSTALL CONCRETE COLD JOINT PER CITY STD. C-341INSTALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STD. C-42INSTALL DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY STD. C-2434INSTALL MEDIAN CURB PER CITY STD. C-85INSTALL DRAINAGE INLET PER CITY STD. D-126INSTALL STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PER CITY STD. D-17INSTALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER CITY STD. S-18TIE-INTO EXIST. MANHOLE9INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT PER CITY STD. W-1 RIM: 325.42STA: 46+71.65, 24.98' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 8" W 318.93
INV. 6" S 319.11
RIM: 325.94STA: 48+36.98, 14.55' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" W 308.49
INV. 8" N 310.00
INV. 8" S 316.17
INV. 24" E 308.49EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0010
RIM: 327.68STA: 53+35.54, 21.18' RTEXIST. SSMH
INV. 24" W 308.99
EXIST. 24" SS PIPE @ S=0.0015
EXIST. 12" WATER PIPE
EXISTING GRADE @ CENTERLINEPROPOSED GRADE @ CENTERLINE
INSTALL 225 LF OF 18" SD PIPE @ S=-0.0011INV. 18" W 315.80 RIM: 326.33STA: 48+27.21, 21.00' LTINSTALL SDMH6
INV. 18" N 315.70
INV. 18" E 318.69
RIM: 325.67STA: 48+26.92, 84.31' LTINSTALL SDMH6
INV. 18" S 315.63INV. 18" N 315.63

IMROVEMENT PLAN
MATCHLINE STA: 58+00SEE SHEET 13
46+0047+0048+0049+0050+0051+0052+0053+0054+0055+0056+0057+00 DRW BY: MHCHK BY: KM
CITY OF VISALIA315 E. ACEQUIA AVE.

RIGGIN AVENUEWIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS
VISALIA, CA 93291
PREPARED BY:

FAX: 559.802.3215TEL: 559.802.3052VISALIA, CA 93292324 S. SANTA FE, STE. AP.O. BOX 7593 Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R
NORTH
0' 40'40' 0'VERTICAL SCALE
2'

NOT FORCONSTRUCTION
58+00
MATCHLINE STA: 46+00SEE SHEET 9
322320
312310308306
316314
324326
318
324322
312310308306
316314
326328
320
328 330
110
111
112
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0402 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 5.

Agenda Item Wording:

Authorize the City Manager to award the construction contract for RFB 22-23-19, Riggin Avenue Widening & Improvements (Akers to Demaree), to Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $4,059,548.45 and transfer $1.6M of Measure R Regional Funds (133) from other Riggin Avenue Widening projects as specified in this report.

Deadline for Action: None.

Submitting Department: Administration - CIP Engineering Contact Name and Phone Number:

Katherine Woodhull-Fuget, Assistant Engineer, [email protected], (559) 713- 4447
Frank Senteno, City Engineer, [email protected], (559) 713-4331 Nick Mascia, Assistant City Manager, [email protected], (559) 713-4323 Department Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to award the construction contract for RFB 22-23-19, Riggin Avenue Widening & Improvements (Akers to Demaree), to Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $4,059,548.45; and

2. Authorize the transfer of a total of $1.6M of Measure R Regional Funds to the Riggin Avenue Widening from Akers to Demaree Project (CP0397) to fund the budget shortfall, from the following Capital Improvement Projects:
a. $1.1M from the Riggin Avenue Widening from Mooney to Conyer project (CP0473) b. $500,000 from the Riggin Avenue Widening from Kelsey to Shirk project (CP0398) Background Discussion:

The Riggin Widening Project from Akers to Demaree (CP0397) will widen the existing roadway to four lanes and provide bike lanes, sidewalks, drainage improvements, and new medians. The widening of the existing roadway requires the installation of six fire hydrants along the one-mile span as well as one irrigation service meter to serve the new median landscaping. This segment of Riggin will be constructed in multiple phases in order to minimize impact to residents and allow for through traffic to continue to circulate. Construction is anticipated to start in January 2023, and be completed by early summer, 2023. .

The basis of award included two additive bid items: Additive 1 consists of pavement rehabilitation using Full Depth Reclamation with Cement (FDR-C) between Akers and Linwood along the southern half of Riggin and Additive 2 consists of flexible delineator posts along the buffered bike lane for the span of the project. This configuration will not impact the structural section of the roadway. If in the future a 6-lane configuration is deemed necessary, the delineators and bike lane can be removed for Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
113
File #: 22-0402 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 5.
the additional lanes. (See attachment 5 for proposed delineator locations).

The existing pavement section on the south side of Riggin between Akers and Linwood displays visible indicators of pavement failure. Research into the history of this segment revealed that when it was constructed as part of the adjacent residential subdivisions, the pavement structural section was not designed to withstand the volume and weight of traffic experienced by arterial roadways. The existing pavement was only built to handle local street levels of traffic, which is why it is displaying visible signs of stress and failure. Bid Additive 1 will rehabilitate this failing section using FDR-C.

Bidding Process:

Staff recommends hiring Agee Construction Corporation to complete the construction of the Riggin Avenue Widening & Improvements from Akers to Demaree. On September 28, 2022, the City’s Purchasing Division issued RFP-22-23-19 to obtain bids for the construction of the Riggin Avenue Widening & Improvements Project. On November 4, 2022, staff received seven (7) bids:

No. Contractor Location Total Bid

1. Agee Construction Corporation Clovis, CA $4,059,548.45

2. AJ Excavation Inc. Fresno, CA $4,391,986.00

3. American Paving Co. Fresno, CA $4,450,687.70

4. Avison Construction Madera, CA $4,465,373.00

5. Granite Construction Co. Fresno, CA $4,509,184.10

6. Jim Crawford Construction Co. Clovis, CA $4,547,109.14

7. R E Mason Engineering Inc. Fresno $4,974,400.00
Staff reviewed Agee’sbid package and found it to be in compliance with the City’srequirements. In addition, staff contacted the contractor’s listed references at the City of Dinuba and the City of Visalia. Two of the contractor’sthree referenced projects were Visalia Street Rehabilitation projects, namely FY 19-20 Measure N Street Rehab-Ferguson & Hurley and FY 16-17 Major Street Rehab- Houston Avenue. Both the reference at the City of Dinuba and Visalia City staff expressed satisfaction with the contractor’s past performance and highly recommend them.

Project Schedule:

The Riggin Widening Project from Akers to Demaree will be constructed in multiple phases. While the exact phasing will be refined by Agee and subject to the City’sEncroachment Permit Department approval, the tentative phasing is as follows:

1. Construction of the North Half-underground work, including 3 hydrants and a water meter by Cal Water, demo, concrete work, paving

2. Switch traffic to the newly constructed north side of Riggin

3. Construction of the South Half-underground work, including 3 hydrants by Cal Water, demo, concrete work, paving

4. Installation of Median Transitions and Worms

5. Striping and Landscaping
Payment to Cal Water for the installation of 6 hydrants and 1 water meter was approved August 15th, 2022.

This project is anticipated to complete construction by June pending no major issues or weather Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
114
File #: 22-0402 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 5.

This project is anticipated to complete construction by June pending no major issues or weather delays.

Project Outreach:

The public will be noticed of construction activity through standard outreach mediums (press release, posting via social media, and coordination with various first responders, Visalia Unified School District and various city departments). No road closures are expected nor any lane restrictions. If a road closure is needed, staff will evaluate if the closure adversely affects anyone and perform necessary notices, test messages, or public meetings.

Fiscal Impact:

Project CP0397
Project Budget
Measure R Regional Fund $ 3,500,000.00
Total Project Funding $ 3,500,000.00
Design Expenditures
Design (4Creeks) $ 104,023.00
City Staff Time (estimate) $ 100,000.00
Initial Cal Water Deposit $ 1,000.00
Misc. (Permit Fees, Potholing, etc) $ 14,716.66 Total Design Expenditures $ 219,739.66
Budget Remaining for Construction $ 3,280,260.34
Construction Expenditures
Cal Water Hydrants and Water Meter $ 155,731.00 Akers/Riggin Traffic Signal by Don Berry Construction Inc $ 72,600.00 Construction Base Bid $ 3,455,268.13
South Side Akers to Linwood Full Rehab with FDR (Add Alt 1)
$ 589,110.32
Flexible Delineator Posts (Add Alt 2) $ 15,170.00 Construction Contingency (10%) $ 428,787.95
Inspection & Material Testing $ 80,000.00
Construction Management $ 50,000.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 4,846,667.40
Anticipated Project Deficit $ (1,566,407.06)
Transfer MR Regional funds from CP0473 and CP0398$ 1,600,000.00 Transfer of $1.6M MR Regional Funds to Riggin - Akers to Demaree (CP0397) Staff recommends the transfer of Measure R Regional Funds from other Riggin Widening projects currently funded with Measure R Regional Funds to address the budget shortfall on the Akers to Demaree segment. The transfer of funds will create a budget deficit for the Riggin - Mooney to Conyer (CP0473) and the Riggin - Kelsey to Shirk segments. However, staff is currently working with TCAG to allocate additional Measure R Regional funds towards these Riggin Avenue projects and the ongoing widening of the corridor. This funding transfer is being recommended by City staff along with TCAG concurrence in consideration of keeping construction moving forward for the Akers to Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
115
File #: 22-0402 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 5.
with TCAG concurrence in consideration of keeping construction moving forward for the Akers to Demaree segment first; the Mooney to Conyer segment anticipated in summer of 2023 followed by construction of the Kelsey to Shirk segment to begin in summer of 2024. The start of construction of these two projects is being coordinated with the relocation of SCE poles.

Prior Council Action:

August 15, 2022
Authorize the City Manager to approve payment to California Water Service in the amount of $155,731 for the installation of six fire hydrants and one irrigation service along Riggin Ave between Akers St and Demaree St.

June 3, 2019
Authorized the City Manager to award a sole-source professional design services contract to 4 Creeks, Inc., for design of Riggin Avenue widening from Akers Street to Kayenta Street for an amount not to exceed $96,093.00. (CIP: 3010-72000/CP0304-999)
Alternatives:

None recommended.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to authorize the City Manager to award the construction contract to Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $4,059,548.45 for Riggin Avenue Widening & Improvements (Akers to Demaree) and transfer $1.6M of Measure R Regional Funds to CP0397 from the CIP’sidentified in this staff report.

Environmental Assessment Status:

Notice of Exemption filed October 31st, 2019
CEQA Review:

Notice of Exemption filed October 31st, 2019
Attachments:

1. Riggin All Segments Exhibit

2. RFB-22-23-19 Bid Type Map Series

3. Bid Summary

4. Ownership Disclosure Document

5. Delineator Placement Exhibit
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
116
S a i n t J o h n s R i v e r
Modoc Ditch
Construction
January 2023
Construction
Summer 2024*
Construction
Summer 2023*
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Legend
Riggin Segment
CP0397: Akers to Demaree
CP0398: Kelsey to Shirk
CP0473: Mooney to Conyer
Railroad
Waterways
City Limits
Parcels
Urban Development Boundary Tier 1
Urban Development Boundary Tier 2
Urban Growth Boundary Tier 3
0 0.3 0.60.15 Miles
¯
Riggin Widening Projects
*Pending SCE Relocation
117
Modoc Ditch
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
W R i g g i n A v e
Lark
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Modoc Ditch
N Demaree St
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Linwood St
W R i g g i n A v e
Riggin Akers to Demaree
Bid Type
Additive Bid 1
Construction Method
FDR-C
Streets
Waterways
Parcels

118
Modoc Ditch
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
W R i g g i n A v e
Parkwood
Payson
Crenshaw
Atwood
Lark
Lark
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Modoc Ditch
N Demaree St
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Linwood St
W R i g g i n A v e
Riggin Akers to Demaree
Bid Type
Base Bid
Additive Bid 1
Construction Method
Conventional
FDR-C
Streets
Waterways
Parcels Page 2 of 7
119
Modoc Ditch
W R i g g i n A v e
Kent
Crenshaw
Kent
Atwood
Lark
Payson
Lark
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Modoc Ditch
N Demaree St
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Linwood St
W R i g g i n A v e
Riggin Akers to Demaree
Bid Type
Base Bid
Additive Bid 1
Construction Method
Conventional
FDR-C
Streets
Waterways
Parcels Page 3 of 7
120
Modoc Ditch
N Linwood St
W R i g g i n A v e
Payson
Kent
Rono
Kent
Lark
Lark
Bollinger
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Modoc Ditch
N Demaree St
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Linwood St
W R i g g i n A v e
Riggin Akers to Demaree
Bid Type
Base Bid
Additive Bid 1
Construction Method
Conventional
FDR-C
Streets
Waterways
Parcels Page 4 of 7
121
Modoc Ditch
W R i g g i n A v e
Kayenta
Memory
Prescott
Payson
Rono
Lark
Bollinger
Kayenta
Lark
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Modoc Ditch
N Demaree St
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Linwood St
W R i g g i n A v e
Riggin Akers to Demaree
Bid Type
Base Bid
Construction Method
Conventional
FDR-C
Streets
Waterways
Parcels Page 5 of 7
122
Modoc Ditch
W R i g g i n A v e
N Demaree St
Lark
Payson
Memory Winslow
Tilden
Kingman
Kayenta
Kayenta
Lark
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Modoc Ditch
N Demaree St
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Linwood St
W R i g g i n A v e
Riggin Akers to Demaree
Bid Type
Base Bid
Construction Method
Conventional
FDR-C
Streets
Waterways
Parcels Page 6 of 7
123
Modoc Ditch
W R i g g i n A v e
N Demaree St
Mendonca
Payson
Leila
Lark
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
Modoc Ditch
N Demaree St
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Linwood St
W R i g g i n A v e
Riggin Akers to Demaree
Streets
Waterways
Parcels Page 7 of 7
124
Katherine Woodhull-Fuget Page 1 11/07/2022
No. Items Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit C ost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Tota l

BASE BID ITEMS
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $130,000.14 $130,000.14 $200,000.00 $200,000 .00 $183,000.00 $183,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $120,000.00 $120, 000.00 $384,071.30 $384,071.30 2 Clearing & Grubbing 1
LS
$75,000.00
$75,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $362,700.00 $362,700.00 $ 40,000.00 $40,000.00 $742,000.00 $742,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $3 9,000.00 $39,000.00 3 Worker Protection 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $7,200.00 $7,200.00 $7,200.00 $7,2 00.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $7,929.00 $7,929.00 $7,209.00 $7,209.00 4 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS $17,500.00 $17,500.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $5,00 0.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 5 Dust Control 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $100.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,00 0.00 6 Traffic Control 1 LS $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $160,000.00 $160,000.00 $76,000.00 $76,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $ 95,000.00 $95,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $1 00,000.00 $100,000.00 7 Portable Changeable Message Signs (PCMS) 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $5, 000.00 $5,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,000.00 $6, 000.00 8 Construction Notification Signs 7 EA $1,700.00 $11,900.00 $800.00 $5,600.00 $500.00 $3,500.00 $800.00 $5,600.00 $800.00 $5,600.0 0 $730.00 $5,110.00 $1,000.00 $7,000.00 $930.00 $6,510.00 9 Remove Existing Ditch Structures 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,047.00 $5,047.00 $4,588.00 $4,588.00 10 Sawcut & Remove Existing Asphalt Pavement (F) 49,685 SF $1.00 $49,685.00 $0.40 $19,874.00 $2.00 $99,370.00 $0.70 $34,779.50 $0.50 $24,842.50 $0. 75 $37,263.75 $1.00 $49,685.00 $1.00 $49,685.00 11 Sawcut & Remove Existing Concrete (F) 1,512 SF $4.00 $6,048.00 $3.25 $4,914.00 $3.00 $4,536.00 $2.00 $3,024.00 $4.00 $6,048.00 $1.75 $2 ,646.00 $6.00 $9,072.00 $5.00 $7,560.00 12 Remove Existing Asphalt Dike (F) 1,255 LF $2.85 $3,576.75 $0.60 $753.00 $2.00 $2,510.00 $1.00 $1,255.00 $1.00 $1,255.00 $4.50 $5,6 47.50 $7.00 $8,785.00 $2.00 $2,510.00 13 Remove Existing Median Curb (F) 1,649 LF $3.00 $4,947.00 $13.00 $21,437.00 $6.00 $9,894.00 $4.00 $6,596.00 $5.00 $8,245.00 $4.50 $7,420.50 $12.00 $19,788.00 $7.00 $11,543.00 14 Remove Existing Curb & Gutter (F) 320 LF $15.00 $4,800.00 $8.70 $2,784.00 $10.00 $3,200.00 $5.00 $1,600.00 $19.00 $6,080.00 $15.0 0 $4,800.00 $20.00 $6,400.00 $7.00 $2,240.00 15 Remove Existing 24" Irrigation Pipeline 250 LF $50.00 $12,500.00 $38.40 $9,600.00 $34.00 $8,500.00 $32.00 $8,000.00 $33.00 $8,250.00 $30 .00 $7,500.00 $36.00 $9,000.00 $32.00 $8,000.00 16 Remove Existing 30" Irrigation Pipeline 43 LF $52.00 $2,236.00 $25.00 $1,075.00 $62.00 $2,666.00 $59.00 $2,537.00 $60.00 $2,580.00 $70 .00 $3,010.00 $65.00 $2,795.00 $59.00 $2,537.00 17 Remove Existing Storm Drain Inlet 2 EA $5,500.00 $11,000.00 $900.00 $1,800.00 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 $2,500.00 $5 ,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,600.00 $5,200.00 $2,355.00 $4,710.00 18 Remove Existing Storm Drain Pipe 2 EA $600.00 $1,200.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,700.00 $5,400.00 $2,700.00 $5,400.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,687.00 $5,374.00 19 Export Material (4,424 CY) (F) 1 LS $35,700.00 $35,700.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $57,400.00 $57,400.0 0 $259,000.90 $259,000.90 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 None Listed None Listed $100,000.00 $100,000.00 20 18" Storm Drain Pipe 74 LF $145.00 $10,730.00 $110.00 $8,140.00 $250.00 $18,500.00 $245.00 $18,130.00 $250.00 $18,50 0.00 $110.00 $8,140.00 $269.00 $19,906.00 $245.00 $18,130.00 21 24" Storm Drain Pipe 223 LF $150.00 $33,450.00 $115.00 $25,645.00 $168.00 $37,464.00 $162.00 $36,126.00 $170.00 $37,9 10.00 $150.00 $33,450.00 $178.00 $39,694.00 $162.00 $36,126.00 22 Storm Drain Manhole (48") 1 EA $5,200.00 $5,200.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $8,900.00 $8,900.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,700.00 $9,700.00 $8,841.00 $8,841.00 23 Storm Drain Manhole (60") 1 EA $7,600.00 $7,600.00 $11,600.00 $11,600.00 $15,400.00 $15,400.00 $15,200.00 $15,200.00 $15 ,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $16,700.00 $16,700.00 $15,14 0.00 $15,140.00 24 City Standard Drainage Inlet 2 EA $8,100.00 $16,200.00 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $9,600.00 $19,200.00 $9,400.00 $18,800.00 $9,500 .00 $19,000.00 $9,500.00 $19,000.00 $10,400.00 $20,800.00 $9,405.00 $1 8,810.00 25 Adjust Manhole (Storm Drain & Sanitary Sewer) 13
EA
$1,700.00
$22,100.00 $1,000.00 $13,000.00 $1,500.00 $19,500.00 $1,100.00 $14,30 0.00 $1,400.00 $18,200.00 $1,500.00 $19,500.00 $1,420.00 $18,460.00 $1,291.00 $16,783.00 26 Storm Drain Tie-In 3 EA $3,500.00 $10,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $3,200.00 $9,600.00 $3,100.00 $9,300.00 $3,000.00 $9,000.00 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,400.00 $10,200.00 $3,059.00 $9,177.0 0 27 Modoc Ditch Junction Inlet Structure 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $42,000.00 $42,000.00 $42 ,000.00 $42,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $41,05 8.00 $41,058.00 28 Barrier Curb & Gutter Type A2-6 1,553 LF $42.00 $65,226.00 $36.00 $55,908.00 $38.00 $59,014.00 $22.40 $34,787.20 $41.00 $63,673.0 0 $24.00 $37,272.00 $24.00 $37,272.00 $56.00 $86,968.00 29 Valley Gutter (4') 300 LF $60.00 $18,000.00 $66.00 $19,800.00 $54.00 $16,200.00 $60.00 $18,000.00 $120.00 $36,000. 00 $75.00 $22,500.00 $44.00 $13,200.00 $119.00 $35,700.00 30 Barrier Curb [Bus Turnouts] 307 LF $30.00 $9,210.00 $36.00 $11,052.00 $31.00 $9,517.00 $15.00 $4,605.00 $62.00 $19,034.00 $ 18.00 $5,526.00 $22.00 $6,754.00 $76.00 $23,332.00 31 Concrete Sidewalk 16,741 SF $8.50 $142,298.50 $8.00 $133,928.00 $6.75 $113,001.75 $4.80 $80,356.80 $9.50 $159,039.50 $9.00 $150,669.00 $5.50 $92,075.50 $ 12.00 $200,892.00 32 City Standard Drive Approach 2 EA $8,500.00 $17,000.00 $12,000.00 $24,000.00 $11,770.00 $23,540.00 $12,000.00 $24,000.00 $10 ,000.00 $20,000.00 $11,400.00 $22,800.00 $9,000.00 $18,000.00 $20,000 .00 $40,000.00 33 Stamped Median Concrete / Median Concrete 6,179 SF $10.00 $61,790.00 $10.00 $61,790.00 $9.50 $58,700.50 $17.50 $108,132.50 $11.00 $67,969.0 0 $13.50 $83,416.50 $7.70 $47,578.30 $19.00 $117,401.00 34 Concrete Median Curb 6,773 LF $40.00 $270,920.00 $29.00 $196,417.00 $26.00 $176,098.00 $19.00 $128,687.00 $30.00 $203,1 90.00 $35.00 $237,055.00 $18.70 $126,655.10 $33.00 $223,509.00 35 Concrete Median Curb with Gutter 114 LF $60.00 $6,840.00 $54.00 $6,156.00 $46.00 $5,244.00 $43.00 $4,902.00 $80.00 $9,120.00 $70 .00 $7,980.00 $33.00 $3,762.00 $84.00 $9,576.00 36 Structural Concrete [Bus Pad] 3,663 SF $20.00 $73,260.00 $17.00 $62,271.00 $20.00 $73,260.00 $14.00 $51,282.00 $18.00 $65,934.0 0 $15.00 $54,945.00 $16.50 $60,439.50 $23.00 $84,249.00 37 Class 2 AB (F) 3,951 TN $34.40 $135,914.40 $42.00 $165,942.00 $52.00 $205,452.00 $42.00 $165,942.00 $45.00 $177,7 95.00 $30.00 $118,530.00 $35.00 $138,285.00 $42.00 $165,942.00 38 Warm Mix Asphalt (Type A, 3/4") 8,529 TN $102.00 $869,958.00 $117.00 $997,893.00 $105.00 $895,545.00 $122.60 $1,045,655.40 $125.00 $1,066,125.00 $90.00 $767,610.00 $124.00 $1,057,596.00 $120.00 $1,023 ,480.00 39 14.5" Full Depth Reclamation with Cement (FDR-C) (F) 15,010 SY $12.90 $193,629.00 $15.50 $232,655.00 $13.00 $195,130.00 $14.20 $213,142.00 $14.00 $210,1 40.00 $12.00 $180,120.00 $11.50 $172,615.00 $14.00 $210,140.00 40 Increase or Decrease in Cement for FDR-C Method 1 LBS $0.07 $0.07 $0.13 $0.13 $0.11 $0.11 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.12 $0.12 $0. 10 $0.10 41 Signing, Striping & Marking Pavement 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $58,000.00 $58,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $55 ,000.00 $55,000.00 $63,000.00 $63,000.00 $89,815.00 $89,815.00 $81,65 0.00 $81,650.00 42 Street Light Single Mast Arm 5 EA $8,500.00 $42,500.00 $9,500.00 $47,500.00 $11,900.00 $59,500.00 $12,000.00 $60,000.00 $10, 000.00 $50,000.00 $8,700.00 $43,500.00 $11,500.00 $57,500.00 $9,350.0 0 $46,750.00 43 Street Light Double Mast Arm 4 EA $10,500.00 $42,000.00 $11,300.00 $45,200.00 $12,500.00 $50,000.00 $12,500.00 $50,000.00 $12 ,000.00 $48,000.00 $10,300.00 $41,200.00 $12,900.00 $51,600.00 $10,87 5.00 $43,500.00 44 Electrical Service Pedestal 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $16,600.00 $16,600.00 $16,500.00 $16,500.00 $18 ,000.00 $18,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $21,100.00 $21,100.00 $1,500 .00 $1,500.00 45 Street Light Pull Box 13 EA $1,500.00 $19,500.00 $1,500.00 $19,500.00 $2,300.00 $29,900.00 $2,300.00 $29,900.00 $1,400 .00 $18,200.00 $1,350.00 $17,550.00 $1,677.00 $21,801.00 $1,650.00 $21 ,450.00 46 Street Light Conduit & Conductors (F) 2,582 LF $35.00 $90,370.00 $18.00 $46,476.00 $43.50 $112,317.00 $43.00 $111,026.00 $19.00 $49,058 .00 $16.75 $43,248.50 $21.00 $54,222.00 $86.00 $222,052.00 47 Fiber Optic Pull Box (N-48) 2 EA $5,500.00 $11,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $4,600.00 $9,200.00 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,600.00 $7,200.00 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $5,450.00 $10,900.0 0 48 Fiber Optic Pull Box (TE-5) 9 EA $3,500.00 $31,500.00 $11,000.00 $99,000.00 $5,800.00 $52,200.00 $5,500.00 $49,500.00 $10,0 00.00 $90,000.00 $9,000.00 $81,000.00 $11,200.00 $100,800.00 $3,250.0 0 $29,250.00 49 Fiber Optic Conduit (F) 3,844 LF $35.00 $134,540.00 $41.00 $157,604.00 $66.00 $253,704.00 $65.00 $249,860.00 $40.00 $153,7 60.00 $34.50 $132,618.00 $43.00 $165,292.00 $65.00 $249,860.00 50 Fiber Optic Conduit- Jack & Bore (F) 1,314 LF $35.00 $45,990.00 $36.00 $47,304.00 $66.00 $86,724.00 $65.00 $85,410.00 $39.00 $51,246.0 0 $33.00 $43,362.00 $41.50 $54,531.00 $85.00 $111,690.00 51 Landscape Irrigation - Site Preparation/Trenching 1 LS $22,500.00 $22,500.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $8, 000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $16,500.00 $16,500.00 $8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 52 Landscape Irrigation - Irrigation Installation & Materials 1 LS $63,569.40 $63,569.40 $103,000.00 $103,000.00 $94,000.00 $94,000.00 $94,000.00 $94,000.00 $ 110,000.00 $110,000.00 $104,000.00 $104,000.00 $103,316.00 $103,316. 00 $104,000.00 $104,000.00 53 Landscape Irrigation - Backfilling & Settling 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $18,000.0 0 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $18,000.00 $18, 000.00 54 Landscape Irrigation - Overseeding/Clean up/Final Insp. 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.0 0 $15,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $14,160.00 $14, 160.00 55 Landscape Planting - Root Barriers 1 LS $20,876.00 $20,876.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 $24,400.00 $24,400.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $22 ,000.00 $22,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $26,752.00 $26,752.00 $20,00 0.00 $20,000.00 56 Landscape Planting - 15 Gallon Trees w/ Stakes 1 LS $13,044.00 $13,044.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $30 ,000.00 $30,000.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 $19,800.00 $19,800.00 $27,00 0.00 $27,000.00 57 Landscape Planting - Shrubs 1 LS $11,460.00 $11,460.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $11 ,000.00 $11,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $11,440.00 $11,440.00 $10,00 0.00 $10,000.00 58 Landscape Services - Water & Electrical 1 LS $19,156.00 $19,156.00 $43,000.00 $43,000.00 $53,000.00 $53,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $20 ,000.00 $20,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $32,75 0.00 $32,750.00 59 Landscape Materials - Mow Curb 14 LF $12.00 $168.00 $55.00 $770.00 $31.00 $434.00 $50.00 $700.00 $75.00 $1,050.00 $70.00 $980.00 $33.00 $462.00 $70.00 $980.00 60 Landscape Materials - Mulch 660 CY $22.00 $14,520.00 $24.00 $15,840.00 $23.00 $15,180.00 $22.00 $14,520.00 $55.00 $36,300.0 0 $52.00 $34,320.00 $24.20 $15,972.00 $52.00 $34,320.00 Avison Construction
Madera, CA
Granite Construction Co
Fresno, CA
Jim Crawford
Construction
Clovis, CA
R E Mason Engineering
Inc
Fresno, CA
Riggin Avenue Widening & Improvements: Akers to Demaree Bids Received:
11/4/22
Engineer's Estimate
City of Visalia
Agee Construction
Clovis, CA
AJ Excavation, Inc
Fresno, CA
American Paving Co
Fresno, CA

125
Katherine Woodhull-Fuget Page 2 11/07/2022
No. Items Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit C ost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Tota l Avison Construction
Madera, CA
Granite Construction Co
Fresno, CA
Jim Crawford
Construction
Clovis, CA
R E Mason Engineering
Inc
Fresno, CA
Riggin Avenue Widening & Improvements: Akers to Demaree Bids Received:
11/4/22
Engineer's Estimate
City of Visalia
Agee Construction
Clovis, CA
AJ Excavation, Inc
Fresno, CA
American Paving Co
Fresno, CA
61 Landscape Materials - Certified Compost (F) 277 CY $33.00 $9,141.00 $20.00 $5,540.00 $24.00 $6,648.00 $19.00 $5,263.00 $27.00 $7,479.00 $25.00 $6,925.00 $20.89 $5,786.53 $25.00 $6,925.00 BASE BID SUBTOTAL $3,109,753.12 $3,455,268.13 $3,716,649.50 $3,753,018.50 $3,760,824.00 $3,944,314.85 $3,243,083.05 $4,241,528.40 As written $3,713,627.00 As written $3,632,085.52
Additive Bid 1: South Side Rehab
62 Export Material (2,259 CY) (F) 1 LS $22,590.00 $22,590.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $48,000.39 $48,000.39 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $45 ,000.50 $45,000.50 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $30,00 0.00 $30,000.00 63 Sawcut & Remove Existing Asphalt Pavement (F) 83,591 SF $1.00 $83,591.00 $0.20 $16,718.20 $0.50 $41,795.50 $0.40 $33,436.40 $0.40 $33,436.40 $0. 15 $12,538.65 $1.00 $83,591.00 $0.50 $41,795.50 64 Class 2 AB 725 TN $34.40 $24,940.00 $37.00 $26,825.00 $42.00 $30,450.00 $36.50 $26,462.50 $40.00 $29,000.0 0 $35.00 $25,375.00 $58.00 $42,050.00 $42.00 $30,450.00 65 Warm Mix Asphalt (Type B, 3/4") 4,158 TN $102.00 $424,116.00 $103.00 $428,274.00 $103.00 $428,274.00 $112.00 $465,696.00 $110.00 $4 57,380.00 $90.00 $374,220.00 $126.00 $523,908.00 $110.00 $457,380.00 66 14.5" Full Depth Reclamation with Cement (FDR-C) (F) 8,663 SY $12.90 $111,752.70 $11.00 $95,293.00 $13.00 $112,619.00 $13.40 $116,084.20 $14.00 $121,28 2.00 $13.50 $116,950.50 $11.50 $99,624.50 $12.00 $103,956.00 67 Increase of Decreas in Cement for FDR-C Method 1 lbs $0.07 $0.07 $0.12 $0.12 $0.11 $0.11 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $0.12 $0.12 $0. 10 $0.10 ALTERNATE BID 1 SUBTOTAL $666,989.77 $589,110.32 $661,139.00 $681 ,679.20 $686,099.00 $549,084.25 $829,173.62 $663,581.60 Additive Bid 2
1 Flexible Delineator Posts 410 EA 75 30,750.00 $37.00 $15,170.00 $42.00 $17,220.00 $39.00 $15,990.00 $45.00 $18,450.0 0 $38.50 $15,785.00 $185.00 $75,850.00 $169.00 $69,290.00 ALTERNATE BID 2 SUBTOTAL $30,750.00 $15,170.00 $17,220.00 $15,990 .00 $18,450.00 $15,785.00 $75,850.00 $69,290.00 $3,807,492.89 $4,059,548.45 $4,395,008.50 $4,450,687.70 $4,465,373.00 $4,509,184.10 $4,148,106.67 $4,974,400.00 As Written $4,059,548.45 As written $4,391,986.00 As written $4,450,687.70 As written $4,465,373.00 As written 4,509,184.10$ As written 4,547,109.14 $ 4,974, 400.00$ * Notes:

AJ Excavation had errors in the total price for items 31 and 61 of the base bid.

American Paving miswrote the total for bid item 59 but included it correctly in the bid total.

Jim Crawford Construction left bid item 19 blank and had an error on item 61.

Base Bid + Additive 1 + Additive 2 = TOTAL BID:

126
127
PP
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5+00
6+00
7+00
8+00
9+00
10+00
11+00
12+00
PI: 10+00.00
INSTALL TYPE IV (L&R) ARROW PER CALTRANSSTATE STANDARD RSP A24A1212121212128 300'
39175 LF39175 LF
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENT MARKER W/ ARROW

NEIGHBORHOODCHURCH

NEIGHBORHOODCHURCH
12121212 12
540'
38303 LF9303 LF
38A303 LF
INSTALL TYPE IV (L&R) ARROW PERCALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSP A24A 970 LF

INSTALL TYPE VI ARROW PER
CALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSP A24A
(TYP. OF 3)
175'
W4-2 & W9-1
R4-1

TYPE F DELINEATOR

TYPE F DELINEATOR
27B535 LF
INSTALL TYPE IV (R) ARROW PERCALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSP A24AINSTALL "ONLY" PAVEMENT MARKER PERCALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSP A24E 4'

REFRESH CROSSWALK MARKINGS(ALL SIDES OF INTERSECTION)
9175 LF38A175 LF38175 LF9175 LF
INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') R81(CA) & R81A(CA)
12 PAINT CURB RED
(165 LF)
PAINT CURB RED(88 LF)
INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PERCALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSP A24A REMOVE & ADD STRIPING AS NECESSARY TOOPEN UP THE #2 NORTHBOUND LANE TOPASS THROUGH THE INTERSECTION(PROPOSED STRIPING & LIMITS NOT SHOWNDUE TO LIMITS OF TOPO)25' OF GREEN PAINT, SEE NOTES ABOVE PP
PP
PP
GUYPP
PP
TREE
13+00
14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
20+00
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
PC: 19+67.82
PT: 23+14.34
PRC: 21+41.08
Mid: 20+54.45
Mid: 22+27.71
4'4'
INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROWPER CALTRANS STATESTANDARD RSP A24A INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROWPER CALTRANS STATESTANDARD RSP A24A INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PERCALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSP A24A

INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANS
STATE STANDARD RSP A24A

INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANS
STATE STANDARD RSP A24A
R6-1RR6-1R
R5-1
R5-1
81212
4'
12128
1212
121212
12 8
8 1212
12 121212 100'
39A100 LF
39A120 LF
39A100 LF
38185 LF
38185 LF
39629 LF39629 LF
38A185 LF
38A185 LF
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENT MARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
IINSTALL "BIKE LANE"PAVEMENT MARKER W/ ARROW
PAINT CURB RED(20 LF)

PAINT CURB RED
(20 LF)
INSTALL "STOP" PAVEMENT MARKERINSTALL STOP LIMIT LINE (21 LF) 11'
INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
38A125 LF91200 LF38125 LF
INSTALL TYPE IV (R) ARROW PER CALTRANSSTATE STANDARD RSP A24AINSTALL "ONLY" PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24E R3-7(R)
TR-2
R4-4
EXIST. "NO PARKING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 EXIST. "NO PARKING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
EXIST. "NO PARKING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 39785 LF39785 LF91200 LF
R7-9
R7-9
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
R7-9
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "STOP" PAVEMENTMARKER PER CALTRANS STD.PLAN A24DREFRESH STOP LIMIT LINE(17 LF)EXIST. "NO PARKING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 EXIST. "NO PARKING"SIGN TO BE REMOVED
100'
81212
39122 LF39122 LF
39239 LF39239 LF
R7-9
OM2-1H
OM2-1H
OM2-1H
OM2-1H
R81(CA) & R81B(CA)
R81(CA) & M6-1(R)
R1-1
R81(CA) & M6-1(R)
EXIST. R1-1 SIGN TO BE PROTECTED
PAINT CURB RED(76 LF)
INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') DRW BY: KCCHK BY: CC
CITY OF VISALIA315 E. ACEQUIA AVE.

RIGGIN AVENUEWIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS
VISALIA, CA 93291
PREPARED BY:

FAX: 559.802.3215TEL: 559.802.3052VISALIA, CA 93292324 S. SANTA FE, STE. AP.O. BOX 7593 Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R

MATCHLINE
AKERS ST. AKERS ST.

MATCHLINESEE SHEET 16
CRENSHAW ST.

MATCHLINESEE ABOVE

SEE BELOW

SIGNING, STRIPING & MARKING PLAN
INSTALL DETAIL NO. PER STATE STANDARD PLANSLENGTH INDICATEDNO. INDICATES WIDTH OF LANE

LEGEND & KEYNOTESXX LFXX
SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES:

INSTALL TYPE IV (L) PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL TYPE IV (R) PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL TYPE VI PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL SHARROWINSTALL "STOP" PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL "ONLY" PAVEMENT MARKINGFURNISH & INSTALL SIGN AND POST AT THIS LOCATION CRENSHAW ST.

1.ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, SIGN SPECIFICATION SHEETS, THE 2014CALIFORNIA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (2014 CALIFORNIA MUTCD), THE LATEST EDITION OFTHE CITY OF VISALIA STANDARD SPECIFICATION AND DRAWINGS, AND THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.2.THESE PLANS ARE ACCURATE FOR STRIPING ONLY.3.ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT DELINEATION IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT DELINEATION SHALL BE REMOVEDBY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS WHICH WILL CAUSE THE LEAST POSSIBLE DAMAGE TO THEPAVEMENT.4.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RECORD AND DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY EXISTING STRIPING, PAVEMENTMARKERS AND MARKINGS AND BLUE DOT MARKERS FOR FIRE HYDRANTS IN ORDER TO REPLACE THE STRIPING,PAVEMENT MARKERS AND MARKINGS PER CURRENT STANDARDS.5.PERMANENT STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED 7 DAYS AFTER NEWHMA IS PLACED.6.ALL EXISTING SIGNS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS.7.ALL NEW OR RELOCATED STREET SIGNS SHALL HAVE CONCRETE FOOTINGS AS SHOWN ON CITY STD. TS-1.8.SIGNS TO BE INSTALLED ON STREET LIGHT POLES WHENEVER POSSIBLE.9.ALL SIGNS THAT ARE TO BE SALVAGED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE CITY OF VISALIA'S CORPORATE YARD.10.GREEN PAINT:
982 METHYL METHACRYLATE (MMA) INTERMIXED WITH HARD-WEARING AGGREGATE (MOHS HARDNESS > 7). THICK, COLOR STABLE WITH > 60 BPN SLIP RESISTANCE. TYPE ENNIS-FLIT "MMAX, TRANSPO COLOR-SAFE" ORAPPROVED EQUAL. PAINT SHALL EXTEND FULL WIDTH OF BIKE LANE FROM GUTTER LIP TO LANE LINE, FOR 25LINEAR FEET IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL.

NORTH
0'40' 40'
#1#2
128
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00

INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PERCALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSP A24A
INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PERCALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSPA24A 8121212128
12121212
4' 4'
9 1,200 LF
9 1,136 LF
39A100 LF100'
38250 LF
39 854 LF
39 1,035 LF
39888 LF39888 LF
39A54 LF39A54 LF39A183 LF
INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') 39 257 LF
39 257 LF
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
R7-9
R7-9
R7-9
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENT

MARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENT

MARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
TR-2
EXIST. "NO PARKING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 R7-9
R7-9

PAINT CURB RED
(20 LF)
INSTALL "STOP" PAVEMENT MARKER
INSTALLCROSSWALKSTRIPING(1' WIDE, WHITE)
TYPE H & OM2-1HMARKERS
R7-9
PAINT CURB RED(93 LF)
GUYUP
PPGUY
GUYPP
PPGUY
UPGUY
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
41+00
42+00
43+00
44+00
45+00
46+00
47+00
48+00
PC: 38+70.68
PC: 45+97.73
PT: 43+16.48
PT: 47+43.51
PRC: 40+93.58
Mid: 39+82.13
Mid: 42+05.03
Mid: 46+70.62
INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANSSTATE STANDARD RSP A24A INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANSSTATE STANDARD RSP A24A 812121212128
4'
100'12
8121212128 4'
4'
12 12128
9 1,201 LF
9 1,169 LF
39A100 LF
38250 LF
39628 LF39628 LF
39139 LF39139 LF
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENT

MARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') 39 1,201 LF
39 1,201 LF
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
39A36 LF39A36 LF
39173 LF39173 LF
R7-9
R7-9
R7-9
R7-9
R7-9. EXIST R2-1 TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE
EXIST. "NO STOPPING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 EXIST. "NO STOPPING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 EXIST. "NO STOPPING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9

PAINT CURB RED
(20 LF)
INSTALL "STOP" PAVEMENT MARKER
INSTALLCROSSWALKSTRIPING(1' WIDE, WHITE)
TYPE H & OM2-1HMARKERSR81(CA) & M6-1(R)EXIST. R1-1 SIGN TOBE PROTECTED R81(CA) & M6-1(R)EXIST. R1-1 SIGN TOBE PROTECTED
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
R6-1R & OM1-1R5-1OM2-1H
38A84 LF
3884 LF
DRW BY: KCCHK BY: CC
CITY OF VISALIA315 E. ACEQUIA AVE.

RIGGIN AVENUEWIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS
VISALIA, CA 93291
PREPARED BY:

FAX: 559.802.3215TEL: 559.802.3052VISALIA, CA 93292324 S. SANTA FE, STE. AP.O. BOX 7593 Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R

MATCHLINESEE BELOW
LINWOOD ST.

MATCHLINESEE SHEET 15MATCHLINESEE ABOVE

SIGNING, STRIPING & MARKING PLAN
MATCHLINESEE SHEET 17
BOLLINGER ST.

INSTALL DETAIL NO. PER STATE STANDARD PLANSLENGTH INDICATEDNO. INDICATES WIDTH OF LANE

LEGEND & KEYNOTESXX LFXX
INSTALL TYPE IV (L) PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL TYPE IV (R) PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL TYPE VI PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL SHARROWINSTALL "STOP" PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL "ONLY" PAVEMENT MARKINGFURNISH & INSTALL SIGN AND POST AT THIS LOCATION NORTH
0'40' 40'

PRIVATE DRIVE
LINWOOD ST.FUTURE
SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES:1.ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, SIGN SPECIFICATION SHEETS, THE 2014CALIFORNIA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (2014 CALIFORNIA MUTCD), THE LATEST EDITION OFTHE CITY OF VISALIA STANDARD SPECIFICATION AND DRAWINGS, AND THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.2.THESE PLANS ARE ACCURATE FOR STRIPING ONLY.3.ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT DELINEATION IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT DELINEATION SHALL BE REMOVEDBY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS WHICH WILL CAUSE THE LEAST POSSIBLE DAMAGE TO THEPAVEMENT.4.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RECORD AND DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY EXISTING STRIPING, PAVEMENTMARKERS AND MARKINGS AND BLUE DOT MARKERS FOR FIRE HYDRANTS IN ORDER TO REPLACE THE STRIPING,PAVEMENT MARKERS AND MARKINGS PER CURRENT STANDARDS.5.PERMANENT STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED 7 DAYS AFTER NEWHMA IS PLACED.6.ALL EXISTING SIGNS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS.7.ALL NEW OR RELOCATED STREET SIGNS SHALL HAVE CONCRETE FOOTINGS AS SHOWN ON CITY STD. TS-1.8.SIGNS TO BE INSTALLED ON STREET LIGHT POLES WHENEVER POSSIBLE.9.ALL SIGNS THAT ARE TO BE SALVAGED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE CITY OF VISALIA'S CORPORATE YARD.10.GREEN PAINT:
982 METHYL METHACRYLATE (MMA) INTERMIXED WITH HARD-WEARING AGGREGATE (MOHS HARDNESS > 7). THICK, COLOR STABLE WITH > 60 BPN SLIP RESISTANCE. TYPE ENNIS-FLIT "MMAX, TRANSPO COLOR-SAFE" ORAPPROVED EQUAL. PAINT SHALL EXTEND FULL WIDTH OF BIKE LANE FROM GUTTER LIP TO LANE LINE, FOR 25LINEAR FEET IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. 129
GUYUP
PPGUY
PP
PP
PP
317.56FNC317.73FNCPP

GUYGUYPPPP
GUY

UG VAULT
PP
49+00
50+00
51+00
52+00
53+00
54+00
55+00
56+00
57+00
58+00
59+00
60+00
PC: 49+56.68
PC: 55+02.51
PT: 54+24.01
PT: 57+02.53
PRC: 51+22.92
PRC: 56+02.52
Mid: 50+39.80
Mid: 52+73.47
Mid: 55+52.51
Mid: 56+52.52
12 INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROWPER CALTRANS STATESTANDARD RSP A24A INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANSSTATE STANDARD RSP A24A R6-1R &OM1-1
R5-1
R5-1
INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANSSTATE STANDARD RSP A24A R6-1R &OM1-1
INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANSSTATE STANDARD RSP A24A 81212
12 121212100'
100'
12 4'
81212 12128
4'
100'
9 338 LF
9771 LF
9795 LF
39A100 LF
39A204 LF 39A100 LF
38158 LF
38169 LF
39245 LF
39245 LF
39669 LF
39418 LF
39505 LF39505 LF
39A8 LF39A8 LF
38A120 LF
38A96 LF

INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANS
STATE STANDARD RSP A24A
PAINT CURB RED(50 LF)

PAINT CURB RED
(50 LF)
INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL BUFFEREDBICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERSANGLED @ 45° & STRIPED@ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') 4'
3935 LF3935 LF
39A98 LF39A98 LF
3949 LF3949 LF
39A32 LF39A32 LF
39127 LF
39127 LF
8 INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
EXIST. "NO STOPPING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 R7-9
REFRESH "STOP" PAVEMENT MARKER
INSTALLCROSSWALKSTRIPING(1' WIDE, WHITE) REFRESH "STOP" PAVEMENT MARKERREFRESH STOP LIMIT LINE 39171 LF
39A33 LF
38 119 LF
39A170 LF
3982 LF
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENT

MARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENT

MARKER W/ ARROW
INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENTMARKER W/ ARROWREMOVE R3-7 SIGN EXIST. "NO STOPPING" SIGN TO BEREMOVED & REPLACED WITH R7-9 TR-2
R7-9
R4-4
TR-2
OM2-1HOM2-1H
OM2-1H
OM2-1H
R81(CA) & M6-1(R)
EXIST. R1-1 SIGN TOBE PROTECTED
R81(CA) & M6-1(R)
EXIST. R1-1 SIGN TOBE PROTECTED
EXIST. W6-1 TO BEREMOVED

REMOVE & RELOCATEEXISTING BUS STOPSIGNAGE
9 1203 LF
39A72 LF
28 LF
UP
PPGUY
GUY
62+83
61+00
62+00
EP: 62+82.56
PI: 62+60.56
121212 12128150' 12
38177 LF38A150 LF

INSTALL TYPE IV (L) ARROW PER CALTRANS
STATE STANDARD RSP A24AINSTALL TYPE IV (R) ARROW PER CALTRANS STATE STANDARD RSP A24A
9 177 LF
R3-7R INSTALL "BIKE LANE" PAVEMENT

MARKER W/ ARROW
9170 LF39A30 LF39A30 LF3947 LF3947 LF39A23 LF39A23 LF
3969 LF3969 LF
INSTALL "ONLY" PAVEMENT MARKINGPER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24E INSTALL BUFFERED BICYCLIST LANE(4" WIDE WHITE MARKERS ANGLED @ 45°& STRIPED @ INTERVALS OF 20') PROTECT EXIST."ONE WAY" SIGN
R81(CA) & R81B(CA)R81(CA) & R81A(CA)
REMOVE "THRU TRAFFICMERGE LEFT" SIGN
PROTECT EXIST.SIGN
39A28 LF
PAINT CURB RED(138 LF)
25' OF GREEN PAINT, SEE NOTES ABOVE
DRW BY: KCCHK BY: CC
CITY OF VISALIA315 E. ACEQUIA AVE.

RIGGIN AVENUEWIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS
VISALIA, CA 93291
PREPARED BY:

FAX: 559.802.3215TEL: 559.802.3052VISALIA, CA 93292324 S. SANTA FE, STE. AP.O. BOX 7593 Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R
DEMAREE ST.

SIGNING, STRIPING & MARKING PLAN

MATCHLINESEE BELOW
MATCHLINESEE SHEET 16

MATCHLINESEE ABOVE
KAYENTA ST. KAYENTA ST.

DEMAREE ST.

INSTALL DETAIL NO. PER STATE STANDARD PLANSLENGTH INDICATEDNO. INDICATES WIDTH OF LANE

LEGEND & KEYNOTESXX LFXX
INSTALL TYPE IV (L) PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL TYPE IV (R) PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL TYPE VI PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL SHARROWINSTALL "STOP" PAVEMENT MARKINGINSTALL "ONLY" PAVEMENT MARKINGFURNISH & INSTALL SIGN AND POST AT THIS LOCATION NORTH
0'40' 40'
SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES:1.ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, SIGN SPECIFICATION SHEETS, THE 2014CALIFORNIA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (2014 CALIFORNIA MUTCD), THE LATEST EDITION OFTHE CITY OF VISALIA STANDARD SPECIFICATION AND DRAWINGS, AND THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.2.THESE PLANS ARE ACCURATE FOR STRIPING ONLY.3.ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT DELINEATION IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT DELINEATION SHALL BE REMOVEDBY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS WHICH WILL CAUSE THE LEAST POSSIBLE DAMAGE TO THEPAVEMENT.4.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RECORD AND DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY EXISTING STRIPING, PAVEMENTMARKERS AND MARKINGS AND BLUE DOT MARKERS FOR FIRE HYDRANTS IN ORDER TO REPLACE THE STRIPING,PAVEMENT MARKERS AND MARKINGS PER CURRENT STANDARDS.5.PERMANENT STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED 7 DAYS AFTER NEWHMA IS PLACED.6.ALL EXISTING SIGNS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS.7.ALL NEW OR RELOCATED STREET SIGNS SHALL HAVE CONCRETE FOOTINGS AS SHOWN ON CITY STD. TS-1.8.SIGNS TO BE INSTALLED ON STREET LIGHT POLES WHENEVER POSSIBLE.9.ALL SIGNS THAT ARE TO BE SALVAGED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE CITY OF VISALIA'S CORPORATE YARD.10.GREEN PAINT:
982 METHYL METHACRYLATE (MMA) INTERMIXED WITH HARD-WEARING AGGREGATE (MOHS HARDNESS > 7). THICK, COLOR STABLE WITH > 60 BPN SLIP RESISTANCE. TYPE ENNIS-FLIT "MMAX, TRANSPO COLOR-SAFE" ORAPPROVED EQUAL. PAINT SHALL EXTEND FULL WIDTH OF BIKE LANE FROM GUTTER LIP TO LANE LINE, FOR 25LINEAR FEET IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. 130
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0430 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 6.

Agenda Item Wording:

Authorize the City Manager to extend the contract with Denali Water Solutions for the removal and disposal of biosolids produced at the Visalia Water Reclamation Facility for a period of six (6) months for an amount not to exceed $220,000 and appropriate an additional $100,000 from the Wastewater Fund.

Deadline for Action: 12/5/2022
Submitting Department: Public Works
Contact Name and Phone Number:

Wyndi Ferguson, Interim Public Works Director, [email protected], (559) 713-4186 Department Recommendation:

Authorize the City Manager to extend the contract with Denali Water Solutions for the removal and disposal of biosolids produced at the Visalia Water Reclamation Facility for a period of six (6) months for an amount not to exceed $220,000 and appropriate an additional $100,000 from the Wastewater Fund.

Background Discussion:

The City of Visalia entered into a contract with Denali Water Solutions in 2017 for annual removal and disposal of the biosolids from the Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). That contract had up to five single year extensions, and the final extension ended August 14, 2022. Due to personnel situations at the WRF, a new RFB to replace the contract has not been established, and the contract has lapsed.

Biosolids can only be kept onsite for a period of 2 years, and the current stockpile must be removed no later than December 31, 2022, therefore a six-month extension to the contract is being requested to allow staff to get the stockpile removed and establish a new RFB to replace the contract.

Staff has contacted Denali Water Solutions, and they are agreeable to an extension, and have quoted $95.00 per ton Landfill Disposal and $72.00 per ton Alternate Disposal Practice (Land Applied). This is a significant increase from the last contract pricing, but biosolids removal and reuse services are heavily dependent on trucking the biosolids to end use sites, as well as the actual land application. Over the last 12 months, the price of diesel on the West Coast less California has increased by over ninety-five (95%) percent from $3.28/gallon to $6.41/gallon (see www.ela.gov) There is no way to determine the exact tonnage until the material is hauled off and weighed, but the average over the last three years is 2,242 tons of material. Staff is estimated the cost for removal to be maximum of $220,000.

In order to be land applied, the biosolids must meet EPA Class A specifications. Staff has tested the Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
131
File #: 22-0430 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 6.
stockpile to determine the classification and the results will be available the first week of December.

If the sludge does not meet Class A specs, landfill will be the only option.

Fiscal Impact:

This project is budgeted annually, however due to the price increase in the contract, the budget is estimated to be short approximately $100,000. Staff is requesting to increase the budget in the WRF Bio Solids division (4336-55700) by $100,000 to cover the contract.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to that City Council authorize the City Manager to extend the contract with Denali Water Solutions for the removal and disposal of biosolids produced at the Visalia Water Reclamation Facility for a period of six (6) months for an amount not to exceed $220,000 and appropriate an additional $100,000 from the Wastewater Fund.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
132
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0446 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 7.

Agenda Item Wording:

Confirmation of the proposed Warming Center at 701 E Race per the Council approved funding requirements and confirmation of a lease through April 1, 2023 of this City owned property for a warming center at a rate of $1 per month upon approval of all appropriate planning and building requirements including the approval of a Temporary Conditional Use Permit through the Planning Commission and compliance with all building requirements.

Deadline for Action: 12/5/2022
Submitting Department: Administration
Contact Name and Phone Number: Leslie Caviglia, City Manager, 713-4332 Department Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Visalia City Council confirm the Warming Center location at 701 E. Race per the Council requirement as part of the approved Permanent Local Housing Allocation, and acknowledge that the City Manager is entering in to a lease beginning December 6, 2022 through April 1, 2023 for the amount of $1 per month pursuant to the approval of a Temporary Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission and upon compliance with building and planning requirements for the facility.

Background Discussion:

There is a need in the community for emergency shelter for people who are experiencing homelessness. People experiencing homelessness have no low barrier options for safe, warm shelter which is especially disconcerting in the winter months. Increasingly, concerns about people experiencing homelessness are being address by the City’s police department, including the homeless specific Homeless Outreach & Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) team, code enforcement, solid waste, parks and other City staff. Without a shelter option, it is more difficult for City Staff to address some of the issues related to homelessness.

The Visalia Homeless Center non-profit has provided emergency shelter during the winter months for several years. Staff believes they are experienced at successfully conducting emergence shelters at a variety of locations, with a high emphasis on being a good neighbor. To be clear, shelters can have problems; but the Visalia Homeless Center has been consistent and reliable in addressing such issues immediately. The non-profit board has tried repeatedly in the last year to obtain a location for this winter; City staff has been engaged regarding the zoning and other issues associated with locations they have endeavored to lease throughout the community; however, few property owners are currently interested in a short-term lease. The non-profit has obtained funding in the last few months that may enable them to more permanently provide an option for on-going shelter, but the funding was just awarded very recently and a site for this winter has not been obtained. In order to facilitate an immediate solution, staff is recommending that this location be provided for up to four Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
133
File #: 22-0446 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 7.
months.

Fiscal Impact:

The City is currently not garnering any rent on this location. A four-month lease will generate $4 to the City.

Prior Council Action: October 4, 2021 - Award RFP 20-21-45 to the Visalia Homeless Center to operate a Warming Center for $118,275 in PLHA annually with 3 available 1-year extensions. July 20, 2020 - PLHA 5-year plan approval June 15, 2020 - PLHA 5-year plan review.

Other: N/A
Alternatives: To not confirm the location and/or the four-month lease.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to confirm the usage of 701 E. Race for a winter warming center up to April 1, 2023, and to confirm the lease for the usage of that City owned facility pursuant to the approval of a Temporary Conditional Use Permit and compliance with building requirements.

Environmental Assessment Status: N/A
CEQA Review: NA
Attachments: N/A
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
134
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

Agenda Item Wording:

Consideration and adoption of Resolution No. 2022-65 to amend the Official Speed Zone List of the City of Visalia and establish prima facie speed zones within the City limits at the 28 specified locations identified within the report.

Deadline for Action: None
Submitting Department: Administration - CIP Engineering Contact Name and Phone Number:

Leslie Blair, Senior Civil Engineer, [email protected], (559)713-4633 Frank Senteno, City Engineer, [email protected], (559)713-4331 Nick Mascia, Assistant City Manager, [email protected], (559) 713-4323 Department Recommendation:

City Staff recommends that City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-65, which will amend the Official Speed Zone List of the City of Visalia and establish prima facie speed zones within the City limits for 28-roadway segments. Locations are listed in the following tables, and exhibits are attached to articulate the specific data collected to support the recommendation.

Background Discussion:

State law requires that cities periodically analyze road speeds to determine appropriate speed limits for traffic efficiency and safety. These speeds are then adopted by Council, posted by City staff, and used to control vehicle speeds and provide authority for traffic enforcement. A summary of the streets studied, and their associated speeds (existing and proposed) are shown in the tables below.

The roadways are broken down into 28-segments and grouped by category: 1) New (4 segments), 2) Increase in speed (1 segment), 3) Decrease in speed (11 segments), and 4) Maintain speed (12 segments). Changes are indicated in bold with increases in speed highlighted red, and decreases in speed highlighted blue.

New
No. Street Name Limits Speed Limit Proposed
Speed Limit
Proposed
Change
1 Burke St K Ave Monte Verde
Ave
Unposted 55
MPH
30 MPH -25
2 Burke St Monte Verde
Ave
Caldwell Ave Unposted 55
MPH
40 MPH -15
3 Hillsdale Ave Shirk St Preston St Unposted 55
MPH
40 MPH -15
4 Shannon
Pkwy
Mooney Blvd Dinuba Blvd Unposted 65
MPH
40 MPH -25
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 12
powered by Legistar™
135
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

Increase in Speed
No. Street Name Limits Posted
Speed Limit
Proposed
Speed Limit
Proposed
Increase
1 Shannon
Pkwy
Demaree St Mooney Blvd 35 MPH 40 MPH +5
Decrease in Speed
No. Street Name Limits Posted
Speed Limit
Proposed
Speed Limit
Proposed
Decrease
1 Akers St Northerly City
Limits
Riggin Ave 50 MPH 45 MPH -5
2 Divisadero St Walnut Ave Whitendale
Ave
35 MPH 25 MPH -5
3 Lovers Lane Tulare Ave Walnut Ave 55 MPH 50 MPH -5
4 Lovers Lane Walnut Ave Cherry Ave 60 MPH 50 MPH -10
5 Lovers Lane Cherry Ave Caldwell Ave 60 MPH 55 MPH -5
6 Nicholas Ave American St Plaza Dr 35 MPH 25 MPH -10
7 Pershing Mae Carden Akers St 35 MPH 25 MPH -10
8 Plaza Dr Airport Hangar 45 MPH 30 MPH -15
9 Plaza Dr Hangar Golf Course
Entrance
45 MPH 40 MPH -5
10 Plaza Dr Golf Course
Entrance
Walnut Ave 50 MPH 40 MPH -10
11 Shirk St Ferguson Ave Doe Ave 45 MPH 40 MPH -5
Maintain Speed
No. Street Name Limits Posted
Speed Limit
Proposed
Speed Limit
1 Akers St Riggin Ave Hillsdale Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
2 Akers St Hillsdale Ave Cypress Ave 35 MPH 35 MPH
3 Akers St Cypress Ave Caldwell Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
4 Akers St Caldwell Ave Visalia Pkwy 50 MPH 50 MPH
5 Cameron Ave County Center Stonebrook St 40 MPH 40 MPH 6 Ferguson Ave Mooney Blvd Giddings St 40 MPH 40 MPH
7 Hillsdale Ave Preston St Akers St 35 MPH 35 MPH
8 Lovers Ln Noble Ave Tulare Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
9 McAuliff St Northerly City
Limits
Mineral King Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
10 McAuliff St Noble Ave Walnut Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
11 Riverway Ave Mooney Blvd Giddings St 50 MPH 50 MPH
12 Riverway Ct Giddings St Approx. 1,000’ east 40 MPH & 25 MPH
WHEN

CHILDREN

ARE PRESENT
40 MPH &
25 MPH
WHEN

CHILDREN

ARE PRESENT
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 12
powered by Legistar™
136
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

No. Street Name Limits Posted
Speed Limit
Proposed
Speed Limit
1 Akers St Riggin Ave Hillsdale Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
2 Akers St Hillsdale Ave Cypress Ave 35 MPH 35 MPH
3 Akers St Cypress Ave Caldwell Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
4 Akers St Caldwell Ave Visalia Pkwy 50 MPH 50 MPH
5 Cameron Ave County Center Stonebrook St 40 MPH 40 MPH 6 Ferguson Ave Mooney Blvd Giddings St 40 MPH 40 MPH
7 Hillsdale Ave Preston St Akers St 35 MPH 35 MPH
8 Lovers Ln Noble Ave Tulare Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
9 McAuliff St Northerly City
Limits
Mineral King Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
10 McAuliff St Noble Ave Walnut Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
11 Riverway Ave Mooney Blvd Giddings St 50 MPH 50 MPH
12 Riverway Ct Giddings St Approx. 1,000’ east 40 MPH & 25 MPH
WHEN

CHILDREN

ARE PRESENT
40 MPH &
25 MPH
WHEN

CHILDREN

ARE PRESENT
Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) can only be established on the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. In making the determination as to the speed limits that are most reasonable and appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic in a safe and expeditious manner, certain factors such as prevailing speeds, traffic accident history, and unexpected conditions (which may not be readily apparent to the motorists) must be evaluated.

Speed limits are typically established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. The 85th percentile is often referred to as the “criticalspeed” and is recognized throughout the traffic engineering field as ‘themost reasonable and prudent’value to be used in establishing a speed limit. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed will make few additional drivers legal, while speed limits set lower than the critical speed will make larger number of reasonable drivers illegal. The majority of drivers operated their vehicles in a safe and reasonable manner based upon their perception of roadway conditions and surroundings, and such actions of said reasonable and prudent drivers should be considered legal with respect to establishing speed limits. When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

However, the California Vehicle Code does allow municipalities to utilize “engineering judgment” in establishing prima facie (on its first appearance) speed limit zones for the two options below.

California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. The justification for this reduction in speed must be documented in writing and signed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

2. The CVC Section 21400(b) does allow for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, but no further reduction may be used.

The following examples are excerpts from the CA MUTCD and are provided to further explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down; If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the Engineering and Traffic Survey and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 2. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the example 1 above). Refer to CVC 21400(b).

CVC Section 40802 requires that prima facie speed limits be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five and seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation. If the Engineering and Traffic Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 12
powered by Legistar™
137
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.
conducted within five and seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation. If the Engineering and Traffic Survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, a registered engineer is required to evaluate that section of roadway and determine if no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred. After fourteen years from the date of the original Engineering and Traffic Survey, the prima facie speed limits are required to be reestablished to be enforceable. For this reason, several existing speed limits are being reestablished in this recommended action, with no change in speed limits being recommended.

Roadways
The following section provides more specific information on the road segments affected by this recommended action.

For each roadway, a breakdown is given providing the following information: 1) Roadway status as identified in the Circulation Element of the General Plan, 2) Average Daily Traffic (ADT), 3) Roadway limits (segment), 4) Existing posted speed, 5) 85th percentile speed (critical speed), and 6) Proposed speed zone. Changes in speed are indicated in bold with increases in speed highlighted red, and decreases in speed highlighted blue.

In cases where the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed required a rounding down, and the recommended speed zone was reduced further by a 5 mph increment, written justification for utilizing engineering judgment in reducing the recommended speed zone is provided in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.

Akers Street
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Arterial 3900 Northerly
City Limits
Sedona St Unposted
55 50 45 -5
Arterial 3900 Sedona St Riggin St Unposted
55 46 45 -5
Arterial 7700 Riggin Ave Modoc Ave 45 47 45 0
Arterial 7700 Modoc Ave Ferguson
Ave
45 48 45 0
Arterial 16600 Ferguson
Ave
Vine Ave 45 45 45 0
Arterial 16600 Vine Ave Goshen
Ave
45 49 45 0
Arterial 18100 Goshen Ave Grove Ave 45 47 45 0
Arterial 18100 Grove Ave Hurley Ave 45 45 45 0
Arterial 19000 Hurley Ave Hillsdale
Ave
45 44 45 0
Arterial 23600 Hillsdale Ave Noble Ave 35 36 35 0
Arterial 27700 Noble Ave Cypress
Ave
35 37 35 0
Arterial 22100 Cypress Ave Tulare Ave 45 43 45 0
Arterial 17700 Tulare Ave Dartmouth
Ave
45 47 45 0
Arterial 17700 Dartmouth
Ave
Walnut Ave 45 48 45 0
Arterial 17000 Walnut Ave Cherry Ave 45 47 45 0
Arterial 17000 Cherry Ave Whitendale
Ave
45 50 45 0
Arterial 14000 Whitendale
Ave
Sunnyside
Ave
45 46 45 0
Arterial 14000 Sunnyside
Ave
Caldwell
Ave
45 48 45 0
Arterial 7800 Caldwell Ave Ironwood
Ave
50 51 50 0
Arterial 7800 Ironwood
Ave
Visalia
Pkwy
50 52 50 0
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 4 of 12
powered by Legistar™
138
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Arterial 3900 Northerly
City Limits
Sedona St Unposted
55 50 45 -5
Arterial 3900 Sedona St Riggin St Unposted
55 46 45 -5
Arterial 7700 Riggin Ave Modoc Ave 45 47 45 0
Arterial 7700 Modoc Ave Ferguson
Ave
45 48 45 0
Arterial 16600 Ferguson
Ave
Vine Ave 45 45 45 0
Arterial 16600 Vine Ave Goshen
Ave
45 49 45 0
Arterial 18100 Goshen Ave Grove Ave 45 47 45 0
Arterial 18100 Grove Ave Hurley Ave 45 45 45 0
Arterial 19000 Hurley Ave Hillsdale
Ave
45 44 45 0
Arterial 23600 Hillsdale Ave Noble Ave 35 36 35 0
Arterial 27700 Noble Ave Cypress
Ave
35 37 35 0
Arterial 22100 Cypress Ave Tulare Ave 45 43 45 0
Arterial 17700 Tulare Ave Dartmouth
Ave
45 47 45 0
Arterial 17700 Dartmouth
Ave
Walnut Ave 45 48 45 0
Arterial 17000 Walnut Ave Cherry Ave 45 47 45 0
Arterial 17000 Cherry Ave Whitendale
Ave
45 50 45 0
Arterial 14000 Whitendale
Ave
Sunnyside
Ave
45 46 45 0
Arterial 14000 Sunnyside
Ave
Caldwell
Ave
45 48 45 0
Arterial 7800 Caldwell Ave Ironwood
Ave
50 51 50 0
Arterial 7800 Ironwood
Ave
Visalia
Pkwy
50 52 50 0
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling on Akers St between the northerly City limit and Sedona Ave at 50 MPH. This is less than a 1/4-mile segment of roadway. Per the CA MUTCD, speed zones less than a ½-mile long should be avoided except in transition areas. This is not a transition area as the segment to the south is being recommended to be posted at 45 MPH. This would be a continuation of this 45 MPH speed zone. Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (50 MPH). Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 45 MPH as this avoids having a short speed zone of less than 1/4-mile long at 50 MPH.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling on Akers St between Cherry Ave and Whitendale Ave at 50 MPH. This is less than a 1/4-mile segment of roadway. Per the CA MUTCD, speed zones less than a ½-mile long should be avoided except in transition areas. This is not a transition area as the segments both to the north and south are being recommended to be posted at 45 MPH.

This would be a continuation of this 45 MPH speed zone. Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (50 MPH). Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 45 MPH as this avoids having a short speed zone of only 1/4-mile long at 50 MPH.

Burke Street
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Unclassified 130 K Ave 900’ south
of K Ave
Unposted
55 29 30 -25
Unclassified 170 900’ south of
K Ave
Monte
Verde Ave
Unposted
55 34 30 -25
Unclassified 500 Monte Verde
Ave
La Salle
Ave
Unposted
55 40 40 -10
Unclassified 500 La Salle Ave Caldwell
Ave
Unposted
55 39 40 -10
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 5 of 12
powered by Legistar™
139
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

Cameron Ave
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Collector 7100 County
Center
Woodland St 40 45 40 0
Collector 7100 Woodland
St
Mooney Blvd 40 43 40 0
Collector 14700 Mooney
Blvd
Stonebrook
St
40 42 40 0
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling on Cameron Ave between County Center and Woodland St at 45 MPH. This a 1/4-mile segment of roadway. Per the CA MUTCD, speed zones less than a ½-mile long should be avoided except in transition areas. This is not a transition area as the segment to the east is being recommended to be posted at 40 MPH. This would be a continuation of this 40 MPH speed zone. Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (45 MPH).

Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 40 MPH as this avoids having a short speed zone of only 1/4-mile long at 45 MPH.

Divisadero Street
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Local 2000 Walnut Ave Ashland Ave 35 NA 25 -10
Local 1600 Ashland
Ave
Whitendale
Ave
35 NA 25 -10
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed that Divisadero St between Walnut Ave and Whitendale Ave is a ‘residence district’. This segment of Divisadero St is a 2-lane local street with a 42-ft curb to curb cross section. Per CVC Sections 240, 515 and 627, residential density is met if within a ¼-mile distance, the contiguous property fronting both sides of the roadway is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses, and if longer than ¼-mile, the ratio of separate dwelling houses to length of roadway exists. This segment of Divisadero St between Walnut Ave and Whitendale Ave has 42 dwelling units within a ½-mile distance and meets the ratio for residential density defined in the Vehicle Code. CVC 22352 establishes a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH for a roadway in a residence district and is not required to be set to the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85th percentile speed. Therefore, in accordance with CVC Section 627 and 22352, it is recommended that Divisadero St between Walnut Ave and Whitendale Ave be posted at 25 MPH as it has the character of a residential street and meets the residential density for the prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH.

Ferguson Ave
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Collector 6700 Mooney Blvd Divisadero
St
40 45 40 0
Collector 6700 Divisadero St Giddings St 40 42 40 0
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling on Ferguson Ave between Mooney Blvd and Divisadero St at 45 MPH. This is a 1/4-mile segment of roadway. Per the CA MUTCD, speed zones less than a ½-mile long should be avoided except in transition areas. This is not a transition area as the segment to the east is being recommended to be posted at 40 MPH. This would be a continuation of this 40 Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 6 of 12
powered by Legistar™
140
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.
segment to the east is being recommended to be posted at 40 MPH. This would be a continuation of this 40 MPH speed zone. Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (45 MPH).

Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 40 MPH as this avoids having a short speed zone of only 1/4-mile long at 45 MPH.

Hillsdale Ave
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Unclassified 1300 Shirk St Lindsay St Unposted
55 42 40 -15
Unclassified 1300 Lindsay St Preston St Unposted
55 42 40 -15
Unclassified 900 Preston St Tommy St 35 42 35 0
Unclassified 900 Tommy St Akers St 35 38 35 0
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling on Hillsdale Ave between Preston St and Tommy St at 42 MPH. This is a 1/4-mile segment of roadway. The alignment of Hillsdale Ave along this segment is an ‘S’curve. There are several local roads that intersect Hillsdale Ave at a skew angle within this ‘S’curvature alignment. Vehicles entering Hillsdale from the cross streets create a traffic safety issue that is not readily apparent to the driver on Hillsdale Ave. Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (42 MPH). Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 35 MPH. This reduction in speed is justified due to the ‘S’curvature alignment of Hillsdale Ave and the cross streets that intersect at a skewed angle.

Lovers Lane
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Arterial 5700 Noble Ave Tulare Ave 45 48 45 0
Arterial 16500 Tulare Ave Paradise
Ave
55 52 50 -5
Arterial 16500 Paradise Ave Walnut Ave 55 54 50 -5
Arterial 14000 Walnut Ave Mary Ave 60 53 50 -10
Arterial 14000 Mary Ave Cherry Ave 60 52 50 -10
Arterial 14000 Cherry Ave K Ave 60 57 55 -5
Arterial 14000 K Ave Sunnyside
Ave
60 57 55 -5
Arterial 14000 Sunnyside
Ave
Caldwell Ave 60 59 55 -5
McAuliff St
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Collector 8800 Northerly
City Limits
Houston Ave 45 44 45 0
Collector 8100 Houston Ave Douglas Ave 45 48 45 0
Collector 8100 Douglas Ave Millcreek
Pkwy
45 49 45 0
Collector 5200 Millcreek
Pkwy
Janelli Ave 45 51 45 0
Collector 5200 Janelli Ave Center Ave 45 52 45 0
Collector 5200 Center Ave Mineral King
Ave
45 47 45 0
Collector 3300 Noble Ave College Ave 45 46 45 0
Collector 3300 College Ave Tulare Ave 45 44 45 0
Collector 3300 Tulare Ave Feemster
Ave
45 45 45 0
Collector 3300 Feemster
Ave
Walnut Ave 45 48 45 0
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 7 of 12
powered by Legistar™
141
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Collector 8800 Northerly
City Limits
Houston Ave 45 44 45 0
Collector 8100 Houston Ave Douglas Ave 45 48 45 0
Collector 8100 Douglas Ave Millcreek
Pkwy
45 49 45 0
Collector 5200 Millcreek
Pkwy
Janelli Ave 45 51 45 0
Collector 5200 Janelli Ave Center Ave 45 52 45 0
Collector 5200 Center Ave Mineral King
Ave
45 47 45 0
Collector 3300 Noble Ave College Ave 45 46 45 0
Collector 3300 College Ave Tulare Ave 45 44 45 0
Collector 3300 Tulare Ave Feemster
Ave
45 45 45 0
Collector 3300 Feemster
Ave
Walnut Ave 45 48 45 0
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling on McAuliff St between Millcreek Pkwy and Janelli Ave at 51 MPH, and between Janelli Ave and Center Ave at 52 MPH. This is less than a 1/2-mile segment of roadway. Per the CA MUTCD, speed zones less than a ½-mile long should be avoided except in transition areas. This is not a transition area as the segments both to the north and south are being recommended to be posted at 45 MPH. This would be a continuation of this 45 MPH speed zone.

Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (51 & 52 MPH). Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 45 MPH as this avoids having a short speed zone of less than 1/2-mile long at 50 MPH and allows for continuity.

Nicholas Ave
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Local 1700 American St Gateway St 35 NA 25 -10
Local 1700 Gateway St Plaza Dr 35 NA 25 -10
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed that Nicholas Ave between American St and Gateway St is in a ‘businessdistrict’.This segment of Nicholas Ave between American St and Gateway St is a 2-lane local street with a 40-ft curb to curb cross section. CVC Sections 235 and 240 define a business district as that portion of a roadway where upon both sides for a distance of 300-ft, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business. A business district may be longer than the distance specified; but if longer, then the ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of roadway must exist. Nicholas Ave was previously posted at 40 MPH, adopted by Resolution 2015-46. Since the Engineering and Traffic Survey performed in 2015, several more businesses have been built; hence creating a change in density. The 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey found 70% of the contiguous property occupied by buildings in use for business over the 2,000-ft length of roadway. With the new additions, Nicholas Ave between American St and Plaza Dr has now been determined a business district. CVC 22352 establishes a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH for a roadway in a business district and is not required to be set to the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85th percentile speed. Therefore, in accordance with CVC Section 22352, it is recommended that Nicholas Ave between American St and Gateway St be posted at 25 MPH as it meets the definition for a business district with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 8 of 12
powered by Legistar™
142
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

Pershing Ave
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Local 500 Mae Carden
St
Tommy St 35 NA 25 -10
Local 600 Tommy St Akers St 35 NA 25 -10
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed that Pershing Ave between Mae Carden St and Akers St is a ‘residencedistrict’.This segment of Pershing Ave between Mae Carden St and Akers St is a 2-lane local street with a 36-ft wide paved cross section. Per CVC Sections 240, 515 and 627, residential density is met if within a ¼-mile distance, the contiguous property fronting both sides of the roadway is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses, and if longer than ¼-mile, the ratio of separate dwelling hours to length of roadway exists. This segment of Pershing Ave between Mae Carden St and Akers St has 44 dwelling units within a ½- mile distance and meets the ratio for residential density defined in the Vehicle Code. CVC 22352 establishes a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH for a roadway in a residence district and is not required to be set to the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85th percentile speed. Therefore, in accordance with CVC Section 627 and 22352, it is recommended that Pershing Ave between Mae Carden St and Akers St be posted at 25 MPH as it has the character of a residential street and meets the residential density for the prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH.

Plaza Dr
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Arterial 6400 Airport Dr 1,300’ south
of Airport Dr
45 32 30 -15
Arterial 6400 1,300’ south
of Airport Dr
Hangars Way 45 36 30 -15
Arterial 3100 Hangars
Way
800’ south of
Hangars Way
45 40 40 -5
Arterial 3100 800’ south of
Hangars
Way
Golf Course
Entrance
45 43 40 -5
Arterial 3100 Golf Course
Entrance
Walnut Ave 50 46 40 -10
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling at 36 MPH on Plaza Dr between a point 1,300-ft south of Airport Dr and Hangars Way. This is approximately a ¼-mile segment of roadway. Per the CA MUTCD, speed zones less than a ½-mile long should be avoided except in transition areas. This is not a transition area as the segment to the north is being recommended to be posted at 30 MPH. This would be a continuation of this 30 MPH speed zone, and when combined together would create a 1/2-mile-long speed zone of 30 MPH. In compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 and in coordination with the proposed speed zone on Plaza Dr of 30 MPH to the north, Staff recommends that this segment be posted at 30 MPH. Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (36 MPH).

Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 30 MPH as this avoids having a short speed zone of less than 1/2-mile long at 35 MPH and allows for continuity.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling on Plaza Dr between the golf course entrance and Walnut Ave at 46 MPH. This segment between the golf course entrance is part of the larger segment of Plaza Dr between Hangars Way and Walnut Ave. The measured critical speed of 46 MPH Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 9 of 12
powered by Legistar™
143
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.
larger segment of Plaza Dr between Hangars Way and Walnut Ave. The measured critical speed of 46 MPH was taken along the tangent alignment section, whereas the overall segment from Hangars Way to Walnut Ave has a curvilinear alignment. Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (46 MPH). Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 40 MPH as this provides continuity throughout the entire roadway segment from Hangars Way to Walnut Ave, and continues the proposed speed zone recommendation of 40 MPH.

Riverway Ave
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Unclassified 1300 Mooney
Blvd
Divisadero
St
50 48 50 0
Unclassified 1300 Divisadero
St
Giddings St 50 51 50 0
Unclassified 900 Giddings St Approx
1,000’ east
40 & 25
WHEN

CHILDREN
ARE

PRESENT
40 40 & 25
WHEN

CHILDREN
ARE

PRESENT
0 The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling at 40 MPH on Riverway Dr for the segment between Giddings St and the point where the road ends approximately 1000-ft to the east.

This segment of roadway of Riverway Ave, between Giddings St and the point where the road ends approximately 1000-ft to the east, is adjacent to the Riverway Sports Park on the south side and the parking lot on the north side. In compliance with the California Vehicle Code in establishing speed limits at the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, it is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 MPH. In addition, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22357.1 allows for a decrease in speed near children’splaygrounds. The local authority may set a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH on a street that is adjacent to any children’s playground in a public park, but only during when children are present.

Therefore, it is recommended in addition to the speed limit being posted at 40 MPH, that it be posted at 25 MPH for when children are present.

Shannon Pkwy
Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Unclassified 2500 Demaree St Carson St 35 42 40 +5
Unclassified 2500 Carson St County
Center
35 40 40 +5
Unclassified 2500 County
Center
Ranch St 35 38 40 +5
Unclassified 2500 Ranch St Mooney
Blvd
35 40 40 +5
Collector 3300 Mooney
Blvd
Divisadero
St
Unposted
65 42 40 -25
Collector 3300 Divisadero
St
Giddings St Unposted
65 45 40 -25
Collector 4000 Giddings St Conyer St Unposted
65 44 40 -25
Collector 4000 Conyer St Dinuba Blvd Unposted
65 44 40 -25Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 10 of 12 powered by Legistar™
144
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

Classification ADT Limits Posted 85th % Proposed Change Unclassified 2500 Demaree St Carson St 35 42 40 +5
Unclassified 2500 Carson St County
Center
35 40 40 +5
Unclassified 2500 County
Center
Ranch St 35 38 40 +5
Unclassified 2500 Ranch St Mooney
Blvd
35 40 40 +5
Collector 3300 Mooney
Blvd
Divisadero
St
Unposted
65 42 40 -25
Collector 3300 Divisadero
St
Giddings St Unposted
65 45 40 -25
Collector 4000 Giddings St Conyer St Unposted
65 44 40 -25
Collector 4000 Conyer St Dinuba Blvd Unposted
65 44 40 -25
The Engineering and Traffic Survey showed the 85th percentile of vehicles traveling on Shannon Pkwy between Divisadero St and Giddings St at 45 MPH. This is approximately a ¼-mile segment of roadway. Per the CA MUTCD, speed zones less than a ½-mile long should be avoided except in transition areas. This is not a transition area as both segments to the west and east are being recommended to be posted at 40 MPH. This would be a continuation of this 40 MPH speed zone. Per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, engineering judgment is allowed to be utilized to reduce the speed by an additional 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the critical speed (45 MPH). Therefore, it is recommended that this segment of roadway be posted at 40 MPH as this avoids having a short speed zone of only 1/4-mile long at 45 MPH and allows for continuity.

Fiscal Impact:

If approved, it is estimated that $6,000 ($100 per sign and post installed) will be funded out of the Public Works Department’scapital project, funded by the Gas Tax (111), to replace traffic signs (CP9555). This estimated cost is a worst-case scenario as existing signs will be field evaluated and may be salvaged depending on condition and applicability such as retroreflectivity, size, etc.

Prior Council Action:
none
Other:
none
Alternatives:

Current speed limits to remain as is but be unenforceable. Per CVC Section 40802, roadways are a “speed trap” that have not been reevaluated by a registered engineer after seven years of being established. If it is determined that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, then the time period may be extended to fourteen years. After fourteen years, speed limits are required to be reestablished to be enforceable.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to adopt Resolution No. 2022-65 and amend the Official Speed Zone List of the City of Visalia as specified in this report.

Environmental Assessment Status:
none
CEQA Review:

Categorically Exempt
Attachments:

Speed Zone Exhibits 2022
Speed Decrease Map 2022
Speed Increase Map 2022
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 11 of 12
powered by Legistar™
145
File #: 22-0406 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 8.

Resolution No. 2022-xx
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 12 of 12
powered by Legistar™
146
Legend
Speed Decrease by
5 MPH
10 MPH
15 MPH
25 MPH
P a
c
k
w
o
o
d
C
r
e
e
k
Watson Ditch
N
o r t h
F
o r k
P
e r s i a
n
D
i t c
h
M
i l l C
r e e k
D
i
t c h
Persian Ditch
Evans Ditch
Modoc Ditch
South Fork Persian Ditch
Mill Creek
Riggin
Demaree
Linwood
Campus
Tulare
Riggin
Akers
Shirk
Chinowth
Goshen
Rd 92
Akers
Main
Linwood
Hurley
Whitendale
Ferguson
County Center
County Center
Roeben
Roeben
Caldwell
Pratt
Shannon
Ferguson
Demaree
Mineral King
Hurley
Visalia
M
i l l
C r e e k
Riverway
Doe
American
Ave 280
Plaza
HoustonGoshen
Shirk
Walnut
Kelsey
Rd 108
Sunnyview
Noble
Hwy 198
Rd 86
Rd 76
Rd 108
Kibler
Ave 312
Rd 100
Ave 272
Rd 100
Rd 88
Plaza
Noble
Ave 320
Rd 92
Ave 276
H
w
y
9 9
.
0 5,000
Feet
Speed Decrease Map
Sheet 1
Sheet 1 of 2
Sheet 2 of 2
Legend
Speed Decrease by
5 MPH
10 MPH
15 MPH
25 MPH
147
O a k e
s
D i t c h
S
a
i
n
t
J o h n s
R
i
v
e
r
M
o d o c D i t c h
J
e
n
n
i
n
g s
D
i
t
c
h
D e e p C r e e k
U p h
i
l l D
i t c
h
Matthews Ditch
C a m e r o n
C
r e e k
T u l a r e I r r i g
a
t
i
o
n
C
a
n
n
a
l
E v a n s D
i t c h
Mill Creek
P
a c k w
o o d C r e e k
Walnut
Dinuba
K
Mc Auliff
Tulare
Ben Maddox
Pinkham
Mineral King
Houston
Court
Main
S t J o h n s
Walnut
Noble
Mooney
Houston
Noble
Lovers Lane
Ferguson
Murray
Shannon
Willis
Campus
Riggin
Woodland
Tulare
Acequia
Pratt
Hall
Giddings
Locust
Mooney
West
County Center
2nd
County Center
Whitendale
Ben Maddox
Center
H w y 1 9 8
Bridge
Conyer
Cain
Santa Fe
Court
3rd
Goshen Jacob
Rd 132
Burke
M
i l l
C
r e e k
Caldwell
Cameron
Visalia
Rd 124
Riverway
Visalia
M i n e r a l K i n g
Goshen
Ave 320
Rd 144
A v e 2 7 2
Rd 148
Ave 280
Rd 148
.
0 4,000
Feet
Speed Decrease Map
Sheet 2
Sheet 2 of 2
Sheet 1 of 2
Legend
Speed Decrease by
5 MPH
10 MPH
15 MPH
25 MPH
148
P a
c
k
w
o
o
d
C
r
e
e
k
Watson Ditch
N
o r t h
F
o r k
P
e r s i a
n
D
i t c
h
M
i l l C
r e e k
D
i
t c h
Persian Ditch
Evans Ditch
Modoc Ditch
South Fork Persian Ditch
Mill Creek
Riggin
Demaree
Linwood
Campus
Tulare
Riggin
Akers
Shirk
Chinowth
Goshen
Rd 92
Akers
Main
Linwood
Hurley
Whitendale
Ferguson
County Center
County Center
Roeben
Roeben
Caldwell
Pratt
Shannon
Ferguson
Demaree
Mineral King
Hurley
Visalia
M
i l l
C r e e k
Riverway
Doe
American
Ave 280
Plaza
HoustonGoshen
Shirk
Walnut
Kelsey
Rd 108
Sunnyview
Noble
Hwy 198
Rd 86
Rd 76
Rd 108
Kibler
Ave 312
Rd 100
Ave 272
Rd 100
Rd 88
Plaza
Noble
Ave 320
Rd 92
Ave 276
H
w
y
9 9
.
0 5,000
Feet
Speed Increase Map
Sheet 1
Sheet 1 of 2
Sheet 2 of 2
Legend
Speed Increase by
5 MPH
149
O a k e
s
D i t c h
S
a
i
n
t
J o h n s
R
i
v
e
r
M
o d o c D i t c h
J
e
n
n
i
n
g s
D
i
t
c
h
D e e p C r e e k
U p h
i
l l D
i t c
h
Matthews Ditch
C a m e r o n
C
r e e k
T u l a r e I r r i g
a
t
i
o
n
C
a
n
n
a
l
E v a n s D
i t c h
Mill Creek
P
a c k w
o o d C r e e k
Walnut
Dinuba
K
Mc Auliff
Tulare
Ben Maddox
Pinkham
Mineral King
Houston
Court
Main
S t J o h n s
Walnut
Noble
Mooney
Houston
Noble
Lovers Lane
Ferguson
Murray
Shannon
Willis
Campus
Riggin
Woodland
Tulare
Acequia
Pratt
Hall
Giddings
Locust
Mooney
West
County Center
2nd
County Center
Whitendale
Ben Maddox
Center
H w y 1 9 8
Bridge
Conyer
Cain
Santa Fe
Court
3rd
Goshen Jacob
Rd 132
Burke
M
i l l
C
r e e k
Caldwell
Cameron
Visalia
Rd 124
Riverway
Visalia
M i n e r a l K i n g
Goshen
Ave 320
Rd 144
A v e 2 7 2
Rd 148
Ave 280
Rd 148
.
0 4,000
Feet
Speed Increase Map
Sheet 2
Sheet 2 of 2
Sheet 1 of 2
Legend
Speed Increase by
5 MPH
150
Modoc Ditch
W G o s h e n A v e
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Roeben St
N
L
i
n
w
o
o
d
S
t
W
F
e
r g
u
s
o
n
A
v
e
W R i g g i n A v e
Rd 100
.
0 1,000
Feet
Akers Street Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Riggin Ave
Ferguson Ave
Goshen Ave
City Limits
Akers St
Existing Posted: 50 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 45 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 42MPH
10 MPH Pace: 39-49
Vehicles Within Pace: 73
85th Percentile: 47MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 39MPH
10 MPH Pace: 32-42
Vehicles Within Pace: 79
85th Percentile: 46MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 41MPH
10 MPH Pace: 34-44
Vehicles Within Pace: 96
85th Percentile: 45MPH
Existing Unposted
55 MPH
Sheet 1 of 4
Sheet 2 of 4
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 43MPH
10 MPH Pace: 38-48
Vehicles Within Pace: 73
85th Percentile: 48MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 44 MPH
10 MPH Pace: 38-48
Vehicles Within Pace: 94
85th Percentile: 49MPH
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 45 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 43MPH
10 MPH Pace: 39-49
Vehicles Within Pace: 65
85th Percentile: 50MPH
151
M i l l C r e
e
k
D
i
t
c
h
South Fork Persian Ditch
Mill Creek
P e r s i a n D i t c h
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
W G o s h e n A v e
S Linwood St
W H u r l e y A v e
S
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Linwood St
W M i n e r a l K i n g A v e
S Roeben St
W N o b l e A v e
Hwy 198
.
0 1,000
Feet
Akers Street Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 2
Hurley Ave
Hillsdale Ave
Goshen Ave
Akers St
Existing Posted: 35 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 35 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 39MPH
10 MPH Pace: 32-42
Vehicles Within Pace: 83
85th Percentile: 44MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 42MPH
10 MPH Pace: 338-48
Vehicles Within Pace: 89
85th Percentile: 47MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 31MPH
10 MPH Pace: 25-35
Vehicles Within Pace: 88
85th Percentile: 36MPH
Sheet 2 of 4
Sheet 3 of 4
Sheet 1 of 4
Sheet 2 of 4
Cypress Ave
Vehicles Checked: 135
Average (Mean Speed): 40MPH
10 MPH Pace: 35-45
Vehicles Within Pace: 95
85th Percentile: 45MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 31MPH
10 MPH Pace: 25-35
Vehicles Within Pace: 87
85th Percentile: 37MPH
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 45 MPH
152
P e r s i a n D i t c h
E
v a n s D i t c h
S o u t h F o r k P e r s i a n D i t c h
S Linwood St
S
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
W T u l a r e A v e
W W a l n u t A v e
S Roeben St
W W h i t e n d a l e A v e
.
0 1,000
Feet
Akers Street Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 3
Whitendale Ave
Walnut Ave
Tulare Ave
Akers St
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 42MPH
10 MPH Pace: 37-47
Vehicles Within Pace: 94
85th Percentile: 47MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 38MPH
10 MPH Pace: 35-45
Vehicles Within Pace: 85
85th Percentile: 43MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 43MPH
10 MPH Pace: 37-47
Vehicles Within Pace: 75
85th Percentile: 48MPH
Sheet 3 of 4
Sheet 4 of 4
Sheet 2 of 4
Sheet 3 of 4
Cypress Ave
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 42MPH
10 MPH Pace: 37-47
Vehicles Within Pace: 83
85th Percentile: 47MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 45MPH
10 MPH Pace: 41-51
Vehicles Within Pace: 87
85th Percentile: 50MPH
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 45 MPH
153
Evans Ditch
S Linwood St
S
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
S Roeben St
W C a l d w e l l A v e
W W h i t e n d a l e A v e
W V i s a l i a P k w y
Rd 100
Ave 276
.
0 1,000
Feet
Akers Street Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 4
Whitendale Ave
Visalia Pkwy
City Limits
Akers St
Existing Posted: 50 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 50 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 46MPH
10 MPH Pace: 38-48
Vehicles Within Pace: 86
85th Percentile: 51MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 41MPH
10 MPH Pace: 35-45
Vehicles Within Pace: 75
85th Percentile: 46MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 47MPH
10 MPH Pace: 42-52
Vehicles Within Pace: 89
85th Percentile: 52MPH
Sheet 3 of 4
Sheet 4 of 4
Caldwell Ave
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 43MPH
10 MPH Pace: 38-48
Vehicles Within Pace: 73
85th Percentile: 48MPH
Existing Unposted
55 MPH
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 45 MPH
154
Packwood Creek
T u l a r e I r r i g a t i o n C a n n a l
C a m e r o n
C r e e k
S Court St
S
S
a
n
t
a
F
e
S
t
E C a m e r o n A v e
S
B
e
n
M
a
d
d
o
x
W
a
y
E Visalia Pkwy
E C a l d w e l l A v e
E
K
A v e
.
0 1,000
Feet
Burke Street Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
K Ave
Burke St
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 33MPH
10 MPH Pace: 27-37
Vehicles Within Pace: 76
85th Percentile: 39MPH
Vehicles Checked: 70
Average (Mean Speed): 23MPH
10 MPH Pace: 19-29
Vehicles Within Pace: 47
85th Percentile: 29MPH
Caldwell Ave
Vehicles Checked: 52
Average (Mean Speed): 30MPH
10 MPH Pace: 25-35
Vehicles Within Pace: 41
85th Percentile: 34MPH
Vehicles Checked: 95
Average (Mean Speed): 33MPH
10 MPH Pace: 26-36
Vehicles Within Pace: 61
85th Percentile: 40MPH
Existing Unposted: 55 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 30 MPH
Monte Verde Ave
Existing Unposted: 55 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
155
C
a m e r o n C
r
e
e
k
P a c k w o o d C r e e k
S Mooney Blvd
W C a l d w e l l A v e
S County Center Dr
W Visalia Pkwy
W C a m e r o n A v e
Ave 272
.
0 1,000
Feet
Cameron Ave Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Stonebrook St
Mooney Blvd
Cameron Ave
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 38MPH
10 MPH Pace: 33-43
Vehicles Within Pace: 94
85th Percentile: 43MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 38MPH
10 MPH Pace: 33-43
Vehicles Within Pace: 98
85th Percentile: 42MPH
Existing Posted: 40 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
County Center Dr
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 39MPH
10 MPH Pace: 33-43
Vehicles Within Pace: 102
85th Percentile: 42MPH
Posted 45MPH
Res 2017-09
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 41MPH
10 MPH Pace: 35-45
Vehicles Within Pace: 98
85th Percentile: 45MPH
156
P
a
c
k
w
o o d C r e e
k
Evans Ditch
S Mooney Blvd
W C a l d w e l l A v e
S Giddings St
W W h i t e n d a l e A v e
S Woodland St
W W a l n u t A v e
S Conyer St
.
0 1,000
Feet
Divisadero Street Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Divisadero St
Residential Dwelling Units: 42
Length: 1/2- Mile
Whitendale Ave
Walnut Ave
Existing Posted: 35 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 25 MPH
157
Modoc Ditch
N Mooney Blvd
W H o u s t o n A v e
N Giddings St
W F e r g u s o n A v e
N Divisadero St
W
M
u
r r a
y
A
v e
W
G o s h e n A v e
N Jacob St
W R i g g i n A v e
.
0 1,000
Feet
Ferguson Ave Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Giddings St
Mooney Blvd
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 38MPH
10 MPH Pace: 32-42
Vehicles Within Pace: 101
85th Percentile: 42MPH
Existing Posted: 40 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 41MPH
10 MPH Pace: 37-47
Vehicles Within Pace: 100
85th Percentile: 45MPH
Ferguson Ave
Existing Posted 40 MPH
Resolution 2020-65
Existing Posted 45 MPH
Resolution 2018-32
158
M i l l C r e e k D i t c
h
S o u t h F o r k P e r s i a n D i t c h
Mill Creek
P e r s i a n D i t c h
S
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
W T u l a r e A v e
W H u r l e y A v e
S Roeben St
Hwy 198
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
N Shirk St
S Shirk St
S Shirk Rd
.
0 1,000
Feet
Hillsdale Ave Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Shirk St
Hillsdale Ave
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 36MPH
10 MPH Pace: 30-40
Vehicles Within Pace: 67
85th Percentile: 42MPH
Existing Posted: 35 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 35 MPH
Akers St
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 35MPH
10 MPH Pace: 29-39
Vehicles Within Pace: 69
85th Percentile: 42MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 33MPH
10 MPH Pace: 26-36
Vehicles Within Pace: 91
85th Percentile: 38MPH
Preston St
Existing Unposted: 55 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 35MPH
10 MPH Pace: 32-42
Vehicles Within Pace: 67
85th Percentile: 42MPH
159
C
a
m
e r o n
C
r
e e k
Tulare Irrigation Cannal
Evans Ditch
Packwood Creek
E W a l n u t A v e
E K A v e
S Pinkham St
E T u l a r e A v e
E M i n e r a l K i n g A v e
S
M
c
A
u
l
i
f
f
S
t
S Lovers Lane
E Main St
E N o b l e A v e
Hwy 198
.
0 1,000
Feet
Lovers Lane Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Walnut Ave
Tulare Ave
Lovers Ln
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 48MPH
10 MPH Pace: 43-53
Vehicles Within Pace: 77
85th Percentile: 54MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 42MPH
10 MPH Pace: 38-48
Vehicles Within Pace: 83
85th Percentile: 48MPH
Sheet 1 of 2
Sheet 2 of 2
Noble Ave
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 45 MPH
Existing Posted: 55 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 50 MPH
Caltrans
Existing Posted
45 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 47MPH
10 MPH Pace: 42-52
Vehicles Within Pace: 71
85th Percentile: 52MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 46MPH
10 MPH Pace: 43-53
Vehicles Within Pace: 65
85th Percentile: 53MPH
Cherry Ave
Existing Posted: 60 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 50 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 48MPH
10 MPH Pace: 42-52
Vehicles Within Pace: 72
85th Percentile: 52MPH
160
C a m e r o n
C r e e k
Tulare Irrigation Cannal
E K A v e
S Pinkham St
S
L
o
v
e
r
s
L
a
n
e
E C a l d w e l l A v e
S
M
c
A
u
l
i
f
f
S
t
Ave 280
.
0 1,000
Feet
Lovers Lane Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 2
K Ave
City Limits
Lovers Ln
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 53MPH
10 MPH Pace: 47-57
Vehicles Within Pace: 80
85th Percentile: 59MPH
Sheet 1 of 2
Sheet 2 of 2
Caldwell Ave
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 51MPH
10 MPH Pace: 45-55
Vehicles Within Pace: 72
85th Percentile: 57MPH
Tulare County
Existing Posted
55 MPH
Cherry Ave
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 51MPH
10 MPH Pace: 46-56
Vehicles Within Pace: 66
85th Percentile: 57MPH
Existing Posted: 60 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 55 MPH
161
Oakes Ditch
P
a
c
k
w
o
o d
C
r e e
k
E v a n s D i t c h
S a i n t J o h n s R i v e r
Mill Creek
S
M
c
A
u
l
i
f
f
S
t
E H o u s t o n A v e
E N o b l e A v e
N
M
c
A
u
l
i
f
f
S
t
E
M
i n
e
r
a
l
K
i n
g
A
v
e
E
M
i l l
C
r
e
e
k
P
k
w
y
E
S t J o h n s P k w y
Hwy 198
Ivanhoe Dr
.
0 1,000
Feet
McAuliff Street Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Houston Ave
City Limits
McAuliff St
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 39MPH
10 MPH Pace: 34-44
Vehicles Within Pace: 90
85th Percentile: 44MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 45MPH
10 MPH Pace: 40-50
Vehicles Within Pace: 86
85th Percentile: 51MPH
Tulare County
Unposted
55 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 44MPH
10 MPH Pace: 39-49
Vehicles Within Pace: 84
85th Percentile: 49MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 46MPH
10 MPH Pace: 41-51
Vehicles Within Pace: 84
85th Percentile: 52MPH
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 45 MPH
Douglas Ave
Mineral King Ave
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 44MPH
10 MPH Pace: 38-48
Vehicles Within Pace: 79
85th Percentile: 48MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 42MPH
10 MPH Pace: 36-46
Vehicles Within Pace: 85
85th Percentile: 47MPH
162
Cameron Creek
E
v
a
n
s
D
i t c
h
Tulare Irrigation Cannal
Packwood Creek
E W a l n u t A v e
S
M
c
A
u
l
i
f
f
S
t
S Lovers Lane
E M i n e r a l K i n g A v e
E T u l a r e A v e
H w y 1 9 8
E N o b l e A v e
E K A v e
S Visalia Pkwy
Rd 148
.
0 1,000
Feet
McAuliff Street Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 2
Noble Ave
Walnut Ave
McAuliff St
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 41MPH
10 MPH Pace: 36-46
Vehicles Within Pace: 92
85th Percentile: 46MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 43MPH
10 MPH Pace: 38-48
Vehicles Within Pace: 80
85th Percentile: 48MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 39MPH
10 MPH Pace: 35-45
Vehicles Within Pace: 84
85th Percentile: 45MPH
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 45 MPH
Tulare Ave
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 39MPH
10 MPH Pace: 33-43
Vehicles Within Pace: 90
85th Percentile: 44MPH
163
N o r t h F o r k P e r s
i
a
n
D
i
t
c
h
Mill Creek
Mill Creek Ditch
W G o s h e n A v e
N
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
S
t
W
H
u
r l e
y
A
v
e
Hwy 198
Rd 76
N Plaza Dr
S
P
l
a
z
a
D
r
H
w
y
9 9
.
0 1,000
Feet
Nicholas Ave Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
American St
Nicholas Ave
Distance: 2,000-Ft
Business Building Frontage: 1,400-Ft
Percent Business Property: 70%
Existing Posted: 35 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 25 MPH
Plaza Dr
164
South Fork
Persian Ditch
M i l l C r e e k D i t c
h
Mill Creek
P e r s i a n D i t c h
N
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
W G o s h e n A v e
W H u r l e y A v e
N
R
o
e
b
e
n
S
t
S
A
k
e
r
s
S
t
W N o b l e A v e
W M i n e r a l K i n g A v e
W D o e A v e
S Roeben St
Hwy 198
.
0 1,000
Feet
Pershing Ave Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1Mae Carden St
Pershing Ave
Residential Dwelling Units: 44
Distance: 1/2-Mile
Akers St
Existing Posted: 35 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 25 MPH
165
Watson Ditch
Mill Creek
N
o r t h
F
o r k
P
e r s i a n
D
i t c h
S o u t h F o r k P e r s i a n D i t c h
Persian Ditch
W W a l n u t A v e
Rd 86
S Plaza Dr
Hwy 99
.
0 1,000
Feet
Plaza Drive Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Walnut Ave
Plaza Dr
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 28MPH
10 MPH Pace: 22-32
Vehicles Within Pace: 82MPH
85th Percentile: 32MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 36MPH
10 MPH Pace: 29-39
Vehicles Within Pace: 80
85th Percentile: 40MPH
Airport Dr
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 42MPH
10 MPH Pace: 36-46
Vehicles Within Pace: 79
85th Percentile: 46MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 32MPH
10 MPH Pace: 29-39
Vehicles Within Pace: 81MPH
85th Percentile: 36MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 38MPH
10 MPH Pace: 33-43
Vehicles Within Pace: 78
85th Percentile: 43MPH
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 30 MPH
Existing Posted: 45 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
Existing Posted: 50 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
Hangars Way
Golf Course Entrance
Aviation
166
Modoc Ditch
S a i n t J o h n s R i v e r
N Mooney Blvd
N Dinuba Blvd
W F e r g u s o n A
v e
N Giddings St
W
S h a n n o n
P k w y
Ave 320
Rd 116
Rd 124
W R i v e r w a y A v e W Riverway Ct
W R i g g i n A v e
.
0 1,000
Feet
Riverway Ave/Ct Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
Giddings St
Mooney Blvd
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 41MPH
10 MPH Pace: 34-44
Vehicles Within Pace: 71
85th Percentile: 48MPH
Vehicles Checked: 53
Average (Mean Speed): 30MPH
10 MPH Pace: 25-35
Vehicles Within Pace: 32
85th Percentile: 40MPH
Existing Posted: 50 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 50 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 43MPH
10 MPH Pace: 36-46
Vehicles Within Pace: 77
85th Percentile: 51MPH
Riverway
Existing Posted: 40 MPH & 25 MPH

WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH & 25 MPH

WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT
167
Modoc Ditch
W R i g g i n A v e
N County Center St
W F e r g u s o n A v e
N Demaree St
W Shannon Pkwy
W R i v e r w a y A v e
W P r a t t A v e
Rd 108
.
0 1,000
Feet
Shannon Pkwy Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 1
County Center Dr
Demaree St
Sheet 1 of 3
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 35MPH
10 MPH Pace: 28-38
Vehicles Within Pace: 71
85th Percentile: 40MPH
Sheet 2 of 3
Existing Posted: 35 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 35MPH
10 MPH Pace: 27-37
Vehicles Within Pace: 64
85th Percentile: 42MPH
Shannon Pkwy
168
Modoc Ditch
S a i n t J o h n s R i v e r
N Mooney Blvd
N Giddings St
W S h a n n o n P k w y
N County Center St
W R i g g i n A v e
W F e r g u s o n A v e
W P r a t t A v e
Rd 116
W R i v e r w a y A v e W Riverway Ct
.
0 1,000
Feet
Shannon Pkwy Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 2
Giddings St
Mooney Blvd
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 36MPH
10 MPH Pace: 30-40
Vehicles Within Pace: 90
85th Percentile: 40MPH
Sheet 2 of 3
Sheet 2 of 3
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 38MPH
10 MPH Pace: 31-41
Vehicles Within Pace: 77
85th Percentile: 45MPH
Sheet 1 of 3
Sheet 3 of 3
Existing Posted: 35 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
County Center Dr
Shannon Pkwy
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 38MPH
10 MPH Pace: 32-42
Vehicles Within Pace: 85
85th Percentile: 42MPH
Vehicles Checked: 100
Average (Mean Speed): 33MPH
10 MPH Pace: 28-38
Vehicles Within Pace: 78
85th Percentile: 38MPH
Existing Unposted: 65 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPH
169
Modoc Ditch
Uphill Ditch
S a i n t J o h n s R i v e
r
N Dinuba Blvd
E F e r g u s o n A v e
E Shannon Pkwy
W F e r g u s o n A v e
N Giddings St
N Court St
E R i g g i n A
v e
W Riverway Ct
W Shannon Pkwy
W R i g g i n A v e
Rd 124
.
0 1,000
Feet
Shannon Pkwy Speed Zone Exhibit
Sheet 3
Santa Fe St
Dinuba Blvd
Sheet 3 of 3
Sheet 2 of 3
Existing Unposted: 65 MPH
Proposed Speed Zone: 40 MPHGiddings St
Shannon Pkwy
Vehicles Checked: 120
Average (Mean Speed): 39MPH
10 MPH Pace: 34-44
Vehicles Within Pace: 90
85th Percentile: 44MPH
Vehicles Checked: 125
Average (Mean Speed): 39MPH
10 MPH Pace: 33-43
Vehicles Within Pace: 84
85th Percentile: 44MPH
170
RESOLUTION No. 2022 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VISALIA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL SPEED ZONE LIST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 10.12
INCLUSIVE OF TITLE 10, VEHICILES AND TRAFFIC

WHEREAS, The Council of the City of Visalia, pursuant to Chapter 10.12 inclusive of Title 10, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Ordinance Code, may enact prima facie speed limits on various roadways or portions thereof with the City of Visalia; and WHEREAS, an “Engineering and Traffic” survey was performed pursuant to Section 10.12.060 of the Ordinance code; and
WHEREAS, said prima facie speed limits are enacted pursuant to the provisions as set forth with the California Vehicle Code;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Visalia as follows:

Under the provisions of Chapter 10.12 inclusive of Title 10, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Ordinance Code, the prima facie speed limit for the following roadway, or portion thereof, is hereby determined and declared to be as shown below, and shall be included in the official City of Visalia Speed Zone List:

Street Name Limits Posted Speed
Limit
Proposed
Speed Limit
Akers Street Northerly City
Limits
Riggin Ave 50 MPH 45 MPH
Riggin Ave Hillsdale Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
Hillsdale Ave Cypress Ave 35 MPH 35 MPH
Cypress Ave Caldwell Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
Caldwell Ave Visalia Pkwy 50 MPH 50 MPH
Burke Street K Ave Monte Verde
Ave
Unposted 55
MPH
30 MPH
Monte Verde
Ave
Caldwell Ave Unposted 55
MPH
40 MPH
Cameron Ave County Center Stonebrook St 40 MPH 40 MPH
Divisadero St Walnut Ave Whitendale Ave 35 MPH 25 MPH
Ferguson Ave Mooney Blvd Giddings St 40 MPH 40 MPH
Hillsdale Ave Shirk St Preston St Unposted 55
MPH
40 MPH
Preston St Akers St 35 MPH 35 MPH
Lovers Ln Noble Ave Tulare Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
Tulare Ave Walnut Ave 55 MPH 50 MPH
Walnut Ave Cherry Ave 60 MPH 50 MPH
171
Cherry Ave Caldwell Ave 60 MPH 55 MPH
McAuliff St Northerly City
Limits
Mineral King Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
Noble Ave Walnut Ave 45 MPH 45 MPH
Nicholas Ave American St Plaza Dr 35 MPH 25 MPH
Pershing Ave Mae Carden St Akers St 35 MPH 25 MPH
Plaza Dr Airport Dr Hangars Way 45 MPH 30 MPH
Hangars Way Golf Course
Entrance
45 MPH 40 MPH
Golf Course
Entrance
Walnut Ave 50 MPH 40 MPH
Riverway Ave Mooney Blvd Giddings St 50 MPH 50 MPH
Riverway Ct Giddings St Approx 1000’
east
40 MPH & 25

MPH WHEN

CHILDREN ARE

PRESENT
40 MPH & 25

MPH WHEN

CHILDREN ARE

PRESENT
Shannon Pkwy Demaree St Mooney Blvd 35 MPH 40 MPH
Mooney Blvd Dinuba Blvd Unposted 65
MPH
40 MPH

The above prima facie speed limit shall become effective with the posting of the appropriate speed limit signs.

PASSED AND ADOPTED:

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Leslie Caviglia, City Clerk

__________________________________
Mayor

APPROVED BY CITY ATTORNEY:

________________________________

172
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0429 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 9.

Agenda Item Wording:

Request authorization to file a Notice of Completion for Greystone Phase 3 subdivision which contains 63 single-family residential lots located on northeast corner of North Akers Street and West Sedona Avenue.

Deadline for Action: 12/5/2022
Submitting Department: Community Development
Contact Name and Phone Number:

Luqman Ragabi, Assistant Engineer, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , (599) 713-4362
Jason Huckleberry, Assistant Community Development Director, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, (559) 713-4495 Paul Bernal, Community Development Director, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, (559) 713-4025
Department Recommendation:

Staff recommends that City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion for Grey Stone Phase 3 subdivision.

Summary:

All of the required improvements for this subdivision have been completed and are ready for acceptance by the City Engineer. The Greystone Phase 3 subdivision was developed by San Joaquin Valley Homes and contains 63 single family residential lots.

The developer has submitted a maintenance bond in the amount of $255,848.28 as required by the Subdivision Map Act, to guarantee the public improvements against defects for one year. Staff recommends that authorization be given to file the Notice of Completion.

Fiscal Impact:

By authorizing this Notice of Completion, the City of Visalia will incorporate the identified public improvements into normal routine maintenance plans and procedures following the one-year maintenance period. This will have a nominal adverse effect on the fund that provides such maintenance.

Background Discussion:

City Council authorized the recording of the final map for Greystone Phase 3 subdivision on November 1, 2021. All bonds and cash payments, as identified in the subdivision agreement, were received by the City prior to map recordation. As required by the Subdivision Ordinance, a maintenance bond valued at 10% of the cost of the public improvements has been submitted prior to Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
173
File #: 22-0429 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 9.
maintenance bond valued at 10% of the cost of the public improvements has been submitted prior to recording of the Notice of Completion. The maintenance bond is held for one year after the recording and acts as a warranty for the public improvements installed per the subdivision agreement.

Prior Council Action:
· On November 1, 2021, the City Council authorized the recordation of the final map for Greystone Phase 3 subdivision.
· Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 21-06 was reviewed and formed by the Landscape and Lighting Committee in October 2021.

Committee/Commission Review and Action:

On January 11, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Greystone 3 Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5576.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to authorize the filing of Notice of Completion for Greystone Phase 3 subdivision.

CEQA Review: Negative declaration No. 2020-51, adopted February 16, 2021.

Attachments:

1. Location Map

2. Final Map

3. Development Disclosure
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
174
MODOC
BASIN
MODOC
MODOC
M
ODOC

LOCATION MAP
Subject Property
O
City Limit

N LINWOOD ST

W RIGGIN AVE

W SEDONA AVE

W FERGUSON AVE

N AKERS ST
175
176
177
178
179
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0420 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 10.

Agenda Item Wording:

Request for City Council to receive, review, and file the 2021/22 Impact Fee Report as required by State Law.

Deadline for Action: 12/31/2022
Submitting Department: Finance and Technology Services
Contact Name and Phone Number: Renee Nagel, 713-4375, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Amee Swearingen, 713-4170, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Department Recommendation:

The 2021/22 Impact Fee Report has been prepared and submitted in compliance with California Government Code Section 66006(a) and (b), and no Council action is required other than to receive, review, and file the report.

Background Discussion:

Development impact fees are a funding mechanism used by California cities to pay for the new or expanded infrastructure needed to serve growth and development. Impact fees are imposed by a local government on new development to pay for the proportionate costs attributable to providing public infrastructure to serve each new development. Impact fees are a charge on new development which helps fund and pay for the construction or needed expansion of offsite capital infrastructure improvements which include roads, parks, storm drains, public safety and other public facilities.

In the 2021-22 Fiscal Year, the City collected Impact Fee revenues of $16.9 million which is an increase of 18% from the previous year (FY 20/21 collected $13.8 million). This increase is a result of the increased development in Visalia. These funds also receive investment earnings and some miscellaneous revenues. However, this fiscal year interest earnings ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31.

The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended.

As shown in the Impact Fee report (Attachment 1), a total of $4.4 million was spent on impact fee related projects in the 2021-22 Fiscal Year. The funds collectively hold $57.1 million in cash; however, these funds will need to collect an additional $140.6 million by FY 27/28 to fund the projects listed in the current 6-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Projects are planned based upon the resources projected to be available in each respective fund, and the Capital Improvement Plan is updated every two years with the biennial budget to make any necessary adjustments. Most Impact fees are used Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 7
powered by Legistar™
180
File #: 22-0420 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 10.
two years with the biennial budget to make any necessary adjustments. Most Impact fees are used to fund large infrastructure projects that take several years to design and acquire land. For this reason, funding needed for construction must be programmed over multiple years as shown in the 6- Year Capital Plan (included in the Impact Fee Report attached), allowing cash to accumulate and fund these large projects.

In addition, there are funds that have been given an advance from the General Fund or have a debt payment obligation. All General Fund advances are charged interest which is calculated using the City of Visalia portfolio earnings rate plus 1%. The annual rate charged this last fiscal year on advances was 1.89%. The funds with advances or debt are listed in Table 1: Summary of Impact Fee Fund Advances and Debt, below.

Beginning
Debt Balance
7/1/21
Amount Paid
2021/22
Ending Debt
Balance 6/30/22 Comments
General Fund Advances
Library (0.06) 0.03 (0.03) City's participation on the Children's Library General Fund Advances Total (0.06) 0.03 (0.03) Debt
Police (3.72) 0.41 (3.31) 2015 COP debt for the VECC Total Debt (3.72) 0.41 (3.31) Table 1: Summary of Impact Fee Fund Advances and Debt
(in millions)
These balances were anticipated and are being managed as part of each fund’scapital program.

The only remaining General Fund Advance is the Library Fund which should be paid off next year.

Even though no changes to the impact fees are currently recommended, past impact fee actions are summarized below for informational purposes.
· June 7, 2010, during the Great Recession, Council approved the reduction of the Transportation Impact Fees (TIF), Park Impact Fee, and Waterways Impact Fee by 15%. The Park Acquisition Fee and the Waterways Acquisition Fee were reduced based on the analysis that showed land acquisition costs had dropped.
· In March 2013, an increase was made to the TIF of 6.5% to reflect 09/10 Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (ENRCCI) adjustment not taken in FY 09/10. · June 6, 2015, Council approved the TIF fees to increase by 11%. · In addition to the adjustments summarized above, the fees are adjusted each year by the ENRCCI rate as part of the City’s annual Rates and Fees process.

With ongoing increases in land and construction costs, staff will continue to review the capital needs of the impact fee funds and perform analysis in order to make recommendations on the adjustment of these fees.

When based on a comprehensive plan and used in conjunction with a sound capital improvement plan, impact fees can be an effective tool for ensuring adequate infrastructure to accommodate growth where and when it is anticipated. It is important that communities rely on zoning and other Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 7
powered by Legistar™
181
File #: 22-0420 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 10.
growth where and when it is anticipated. It is important that communities rely on zoning and other land use regulations, consistent with a comprehensive plan, to influence patterns of growth and to accurately predict new infrastructure needs. However, in areas facing development postponement due to the lack of adequate public facilities, impact fees may be viewed not as growth controlling measures, but rather as growth facilitators when they provide needed funding for required infrastructure. Typically, impact fees are:
· Levied on an "up-front" or "front-end" basis, usually at the time of building permit issuance or subdivision approval; and
· Dedicated to a specific public use, such as transportation facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, or parks and recreation facilities, etc.; and · Calculated based upon the number of residents or bedrooms in a dwelling, the square footage of a building, the linear footage of the front property line, or as a flat fee per unit or building lot, or some other formulation; and
· Prescribed by ordinance.

The purpose of this report is to disclose the City’s collection and use of impact fees and to demonstrate that these monies were appropriately spent on impact related projects. The 2021-22 Impact Fee Report is in compliance with Government Code Section 66006 which requires agencies to provide information on each fund or account established for the collection of impact fees. Within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year this information must be made available to the public for the period covered by that fiscal year. The report must include the following:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the fund.

2. The amount of the fee.

3. The beginning and ending balances of the fund.

4. The amount of fees collected, and the interest earned.

5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the improvement that was funded with fees.

6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the City determines that sufficient funds have collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.

7. A description of each inter-fund transfer or loan made from the fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and in the case of an inter-fund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that will be received on the loan.

8. The amount of refunds made per Government Code Section 66001 (e).

The availability of the 2021-22 Impact Fee Report was published in the Visalia Times Delta on November 16, 2022. Once the information is available to the public, but not less than 15 days from the date it is made available, the City Council must review the information at its next regularly Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 7
powered by Legistar™
182
File #: 22-0420 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 10.
the date it is made available, the City Council must review the information at its next regularly scheduled meeting. A notice of the time and place of this meeting, including the address where the information may be reviewed, must be mailed at least 15 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the City for mailed notice of the meeting.

The 2021-22 Impact Fee Report provides information on the following Impact Fee Funds:

Fund Description
102 Public Facility - Civic Center Impact Fund
103 Public Facility - Corportation Yard Impact Fund
104 Public Facility - Library Impact Fund
105 Police Impact Fund
106 Fire Impact Fund
211 Park & Recreation Facilities Fund
221 Storm Sewer Construction Fund
231 Wastewater Trunk Line Construction
232 Sewer Connection Fund
241 Transportation Impact Fund
261 Waterways Fund
291 Northeast Capital Improvement Fund
All Impact Funds are in compliance with the State Law, as shown below in Table 2: Summary Report 2021-22 Impact Fee Funds.

Fund
Beginning
Cash
Balance
7/1/21
Internal Loan/
Debt/
Developer
Agreement
Beginning
Balances
Total
Beginning
Balance
Total
Revenue
Total
Expenses
Ending
Cash
Balance
6/30/22
C.I.P Money
Appropriated
6/30/22
Ending
Resources
Available
Future
C.I.P.

Projects
2022/23-
2027/28
Future
Revenue
Needed
Public Facility - Civic Center Impact
Fund (102) $6,907 $0 $6,907 $633 ($12) $7,528 $0 $7,528 $0 0 Public Facility - Corportation Yard
Impact Fund (103) 948 0 948 114 (2) 1,060 (87) 973 (1,638) 665 Public Facility - Library Impact
Fund (104) 0 (60) (60) 35 (1) (26) 0 (26) 0 26
Police Impact Fund (105) 79 (3,722) (3,643) 415 (415) (3,644) 0 (3,644) 0 3,644 Fire Impact Fund (106) 208 0 208 649 (63) 793 (33) 760 (225) 0 Park & Recreation Facilities Fund
(211) 6,570 0 6,570 2,485 (171) 8,885 (3,869) 5,016 (60,511)55,495 Storm Sewer Construction Fund
(221) 3,353 0 3,353 1,652 (527) 4,478 (1,418) 3,060 (15,335)12,275 Wastewater Trunk Line
Construction (231) 12,507 0 12,507 1,448 (609) 13,346 (8,270) 5,076 (13,221) 8,145 Sewer Connection Fund (232)762 0 762 829 (1) 1,590 0 1,590 0 0 Transportation Impact Fund (241)16,884 (1,337) 15,547 6,211 (3,076) 18,682 (12,071) 6,611 (62,027)55,416 Waterways Fund (261) 3,101 0 3,101 726 (148) 3,679 (593) 3,086 (8,034) 4,948 Northeast Capital Improvement
Fund (291) 667 0 667 42 (1) 707 (700) 7 0 0
Total $51,985 ($5,119)$46,866$15,238($5,027)$57,077 ($27,041)$30,036($160,989)$140,613

SUMMARY REPORT
2021/22 Impact Fee Funds
(In thousands)
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 4 of 7
powered by Legistar™
183
File #: 22-0420 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 10.

Fund
Beginning
Cash
Balance
7/1/21
Internal Loan/
Debt/
Developer
Agreement
Beginning
Balances
Total
Beginning
Balance
Total
Revenue
Total
Expenses
Ending
Cash
Balance
6/30/22
C.I.P Money
Appropriated
6/30/22
Ending
Resources
Available
Future
C.I.P.

Projects
2022/23-
2027/28
Future
Revenue
Needed
Public Facility - Civic Center Impact
Fund (102) $6,907 $0 $6,907 $633 ($12) $7,528 $0 $7,528 $0 0 Public Facility - Corportation Yard
Impact Fund (103) 948 0 948 114 (2) 1,060 (87) 973 (1,638) 665 Public Facility - Library Impact
Fund (104) 0 (60) (60) 35 (1) (26) 0 (26) 0 26
Police Impact Fund (105) 79 (3,722) (3,643) 415 (415) (3,644) 0 (3,644) 0 3,644 Fire Impact Fund (106) 208 0 208 649 (63) 793 (33) 760 (225) 0 Park & Recreation Facilities Fund
(211) 6,570 0 6,570 2,485 (171) 8,885 (3,869) 5,016 (60,511)55,495 Storm Sewer Construction Fund
(221) 3,353 0 3,353 1,652 (527) 4,478 (1,418) 3,060 (15,335)12,275 Wastewater Trunk Line
Construction (231) 12,507 0 12,507 1,448 (609) 13,346 (8,270) 5,076 (13,221) 8,145 Sewer Connection Fund (232)762 0 762 829 (1) 1,590 0 1,590 0 0 Transportation Impact Fund (241)16,884 (1,337) 15,547 6,211 (3,076) 18,682 (12,071) 6,611 (62,027)55,416 Waterways Fund (261) 3,101 0 3,101 726 (148) 3,679 (593) 3,086 (8,034) 4,948 Northeast Capital Improvement
Fund (291) 667 0 667 42 (1) 707 (700) 7 0 0
Total $51,985 ($5,119)$46,866$15,238($5,027)$57,077 ($27,041)$30,036($160,989)$140,613

SUMMARY REPORT
2021/22 Impact Fee Funds
(In thousands)
Table 2 is a summary of all the Impact Funds and shows the future revenue required in each fund to pay for both current projects and future projects included in the Capital Budget plan through 2027-28.

As new development occurs, additional impact fees will be collected to fund the projects reflected in the “Future Revenue Required” column of Table 2. Four funds are shown as not needing future revenue at this time due to projects not being listed in the current 6 year plan. These funds are the Civic Center fund, Fire Impact, Sewer Connection fund, and the Northeast Capital Improvement fund.

Below is more detail on the four funds:
· Civic Center-Public Facility Fees (102) and Fire Impact Fund (106) will be used to help fund Phase 2 of the Civic Center project which will construct the Public Safety Office Building, Evidence Building, and Council Chambers. In addition to impact fees, Civic Center Phase 2 will receive funding from other sources. This project, which is currently under design, will require a significant investment and in anticipation of this, impact fees are being accumulated to be used to help finance this project.
· The Police (105) and Library Impact (104) Funds do not show any future capital improvement needs however, they are each repaying internal loans and debt financing which are discussed in more detail below.
· The Library Impact Fees (104) have contributed to a joint project with Tulare County for the rehabilitation and expansion of the Visalia branch of the Tulare County Library. The project Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 5 of 7
powered by Legistar™
184
File #: 22-0420 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 10.
rehabilitation and expansion of the Visalia branch of the Tulare County Library. The project converted the old unused library building which had been replaced by new construction in 1976, for use as a children’slibrary wing, and provided upgrades to the main library building.

The rehabilitation project was completed in 2010 and the total amount of the loan from the General Fund to pay the impact fee portion of the project was $269,189. The balance of the loan as of June 30, 2022, is $26,020. Council approved the loan for the Library Expansion and Rehabilitation project knowing that there weren’tenough funds to complete the project and the General Fund would need to advance the funds. This year the City collected $35,098 in impact fees and is projected to repay the advance in the next year. · The Police Impact Fund shares in the cost of the Visalia Emergency Communications Center by paying a portion of the debt payment. This debt was issued August 2015 for a total of $23.3 million (VECC and Convention Center renovation) to be paid back in 15 years (FY 29-30). This funds share is 26.25% or $6.1 million. This funds portion of the debt payment for FY 21/22 was $414,541, and the ending balance of the remaining obligation in this fund is $3,307,858. · Sewer Connection Fund (232) does not have any future projects due to the sewer master plan being updated. The plan is currently under contract and being updated by the Engineering Department. Once the plan is updated, several projects will come to Council to be appropriated with the impact fee.
· Northeast capital fund (291) has no future projects identified in this current 6-year plan to allow funds to accumulate to be able to fund additional projects. The fund currently has approximately $7,000 in cash available.

The Impact Fee Report shows an amount required for future projects. This future project amount is taken from the 6-Year Capital Plan that was adopted with the City’s2 Year Budget in June 2022. The Capital Plan is amended throughout the year as Council approves projects that need to move forward or as opportunities arise.

Fiscal Impact:

The Annual Impact Fee Report summarizes actual data from events that have already occurred.

There is no fiscal Impact which will result from review and acceptance of the report.

Prior Council Action: The Annual Impact Fee Report is brought to Council within 180 of the last day of each fiscal year. The report was last reviewed by Council on November 15, 2021.

Other: N/A
Alternatives: N/A
Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 6 of 7
powered by Legistar™
185
File #: 22-0420 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 10.

I move that Council receives, reviews, and files the report.

Environmental Assessment Status: N/A
CEQA Review: N/A
Attachments: Attachment 1: City of Visalia Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 7 of 7
powered by Legistar™
186

City of VisaIia

IMPACT FEE REPORT

Fiscal Year 2021-22

187

ii
2021-22 IMPACT FEE REPORT

Table of Contents

Summary Report ............................................................................................................. 1 Public Facility - Civic Center Impact Fund (102) ........................................................... 2-3

1. Civic Center Impact Fund Balance ....................................................................... 2

2. Civic Center Impact Project Status ...................................................................... 3 Public Facility - Corporation Yard Impact Fund (103) ................................................... 4-5

1. Corporation Yard Impact Fund Balance ............................................................... 4

2. Corporation Yard Impact Project Status ............................................................... 5 Public Facility - Library Impact Fund (104) ................................................................... 6-8

1. Library Impact Fund Balance ............................................................................... 6

2. Library Impact Project Status ............................................................................... 7

3. Public Facilities Impact Fees ............................................................................... 8 Police Impact Fund (105) ........................................................................................... 9-10

1. Police Impact Fund Balance ................................................................................ 9

2. Police Impact Project Status .............................................................................. 10 Fire Impact Fund (106) ............................................................................................. 11-13

1. Fire Impact Fund Balance .................................................................................. 11

2. Fire Impact Project Status .................................................................................. 12

3. Public Safety Impact Fees ................................................................................. 13 Park & Recreation Facilities Fund (211) ................................................................... 14-17

1. Park & Recreation Facilities Fund Balance ........................................................ 14

2. Park & Recreation Facilities Project Status ........................................................ 15

3. Park & Recreation Impact Fees ......................................................................... 17 Storm Sewer Construction Fund (221) ..................................................................... 18-22

1. Storm Sewer Construction Fund Balance .......................................................... 18

2. Storm Sewer Construction Project Status .......................................................... 19

3. Storm Sewer Construction Impact Fees ............................................................. 21 Wastewater Trunk Line Construction Fund (231) ..................................................... 23-25

1. Wastewater Trunk Line Construction Fund Balance .......................................... 23

2. Wastewater Trunk Line Construction Project Status .......................................... 24

3. Trunk Line Impact Fees ..................................................................................... 25

188

iii
Table of Contents (Continued)

Sewer Connection Fund (232) .................................................................................. 26-28

1. Sewer Connection Fund Balance ....................................................................... 26

2. Sewer Connection Project Status ...................................................................... 27

3. Connection Fees ............................................................................................... 28 Transportation Impact Fund (241) ............................................................................ 29-35

1. Transportation Impact Fund Balance ................................................................. 29

2. Transportation Impact Fund Project Status ........................................................ 30

3. Transportation Impact Fees ............................................................................... 33 Waterways Fund (261) ............................................................................................. 36-38

1. Waterways Fund Balance .................................................................................. 36

2. Waterways Fund Project Status ......................................................................... 37

3. Waterways Impact Fees .................................................................................... 39 Northeast Capital Improvement Fund (291) .............................................................. 40-42

1. Northeast Capital Improvement Fund Balance ................................................... 40

2. Northeast Capital Improvement Fund Project Status ........................................ .41

3. Northeast Capital Improvement Impact Fees ..................................................... 42

Attachments:

City of Visalia 6 Year Capital Improvement Program .......................................... 43-67

189

1 Fund
Beginning
Cash Balance
7/1/21●
Beginning
Balance Total Revenue
Total
Expenditures
Ending Cash
Balance
6/30/22
C.I.P Money
Appropriated
6/30/22
Future C.I.P.

Projects
2022/23-2027/28
Future
Revenue
Needed
Public Facility - Civic Center Impact
Fund (102) 1 $6,907,362 $0 $6,907,362 $632,621 ($12,095) $7,527,888 $0 $7,527,888 $0 0 Public Facility - Corportation Yard
Impact Fund (103) 947,672 0 $947,672 114,312 (2,354) 1,059,630 (87,100) 972,530 (1,637,500) 664,970 Public Facility - Library Impact
Fund (104) 2 0 (59,659) ♦ ($59,659) 35,098 (1,460) (26,021) 0 (26,021) ♦♦ 0 26,021 Police Impact Fund (105) 2 79,075 (3,722,399) ♦ ($3,643,324) 414,653 (415,343) (3,644,014) 0 (3,644,014) ♦♦ 0 3,644,014 Fire Impact Fund (106) 208,047 0 $208,047 648,657 (63,488) 793,216 (33,236) 759,980 (225,000) 0 Park & Recreation Facilities Fund
(211) 6,570,233 0 $6,570,233 2,484,985 (170,683) 8,884,535 (3,868,567) 5,015,968 (60,510,800) 55,494,832 Storm Sewer Construction Fund
(221) 3,353,045 0 $3,353,045 1,652,005 (526,981) 4,478,068 (1,417,755) 3,060,313 (15,335,100) 12,274,787 Wastewater Trunk Line
Construction (231) 12,506,909 0 $12,506,909 1,447,802 (608,852) 13,345,859 (8,270,148) 5,075,711 (13,220,700) 8,144,989 Sewer Connection Fund (232) 1 761,854 0 $761,854 829,075 (997) 1,589,931 0 1,589,931 0 0 Transportation Impact Fund (241) 16,883,594 (1,336,919) ♦ $15,546,675 6,210,779 (3,075,817) 18,681,637 (12,071,049) 6,610,588 (62,026,500) 55,415,912 Waterways Fund (261) 3,101,041 0 $3,101,041 725,888 (147,612) 3,679,317 (593,315) 3,086,002 (8,033,800) 4,947,798 Northeast Capital Improvement
Fund (291) 1 666,621 0 $666,621 41,944 (1,477) 707,088 (700,000) $7,088 0 0 Total $51,985,450 $46,866,474 $15,237,819 ($5,027,157) $57,077,135 ($27,041,170) ($160,989,400) $140,613,322

SUMMARY REPORT
2021/22 Impact Fee Funds
Ending
Resources
Available
$30,035,966
2) Public Facility-Library Impact Fund (104), Police Impact Fund (105) show no funding for future projects. These funds are currently paying down a loan or an advance for past projects. These funds will be reviewed in the next 2-year capital budget process to determine their ability to fund additional projects.

Internal Loan/
Developer
Agreement
Balances
A detailed list of Future CIP projects is provided in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by the City Council on June 20, 2022 with the City's 2-Year Budget. ●Details of adjustments to Beginning Cash Balance made in accordance with the Audit are provided in the footnotes of the Fund Balance Summary for each Impact fee fund. ($5,118,977)
♦♦ Funds showing negative ending resources available have appropriations which exceed their current available cash. These funds will either have a General Fund advance or loan to cover the negative.
♦ Details of Internal Loan/Developer Agreement Balances are provided in the footnotes of the Fund Balance Summary for each Impact fee fund. 1) The Public Facility - Civic Center Impact Fund (102), Sewer Conneciton Fund (232), and Northeast Capital Fund (291) show no future projects. These funds will be reviewed in the next 2-year capital budget process to determine future projects.
190

2 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 6,907,362$
Revenue
Investment Earnings (215,429) *
Public Facility - Civic Center Impact Fee 848,050
Total Revenues 632,621
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (12,095)
Total Expenditure (12,095)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 7,527,888
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 0
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 7,527,888
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 0
Future Revenue Needed -$
Public Facility - Civic Center Impact Fund (102)
Impact Fee Report 2021/22
Note: Although the Civic Center fund expenditures or future capital don't show it yet, the Civic Center Fund will share in the cost of the Public Safety Office Building. *Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended. 191

3 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
102 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
This fund has no projects in FY 21/22.

Funds will be used for construction of a
Public Safety Office Building. Phase 1 of
design began in FY 20/21 (CP0374)
funded by General Fund reserves (003-
Civic Center Reserve). Design work will
continue in FY 22/23.
0 0 0
Expenditure Total $ - $ - $ - The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

Financing Complete?
Public Facility - Civic Center Fund (102)
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from Public Facility impact fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds are to only be used for new facilities, and not for operation and maintenance.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project. 192

4 AB1600
Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 947,672$
Revenue
Investment Earnings (29,728) *
Public Facility - Corporation Yard Impact Fee 144,040
Total Revenues 114,312
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (2,354)
Total Expenditure (2,354)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 1,059,630
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 (87,100)
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 972,530
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 (1,637,500)
Future Revenue Needed 664,970$
Public Facility - Corporation Yard Impact Fund (103)
Impact Fee Report 2021/22
*Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended.
193

5 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
103 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
This fund has no projects in FY 21/22. 0 0 0
Expenditure Total 0 0 0
The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

Financing Complete?
Public Facility - Corporation Yard Fund (103)
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from Public Facility impact fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds are to only be used for new facilities for the Corporation Yard, and not for operation and maintenance.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project. 194

6 AB1600
Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 -$
Internal Loan Balances (59,659) *
Beginning Balance (59,659)
Revenue
Public Facility - Library Impact Fee 35,098
Total Revenues 35,098
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (665)
Interest Expense-General Fund Advance (794)
Capital Improvement Program 0
Total Expenditure (1,460)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 (26,021)
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 0
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 (26,021)
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 0
Future Revenue Needed 26,021$
Public Facility - Library Impact Fund (104)
Impact Fee Report 2021/22
* The Internal loan is from the Library rehabilitation project that was completed in 2010. The total amount of the loan was $269,189 and the balance of the loan at June 30, 2022 is $26,020.75. At the end of each month, the cash balance of this fund is used to pay down the General Fund advance. All advances receive an interest charge which is calculated by taking the City of Visalia portfolio earnings rate + 1%. The annual rate charged on General Fund advances averaged 0.89% in the 2021/22 Fiscal Year.
195

7 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
104 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
This fund has no projects in FY 21/22
Fund is paying back a loan for prior
capital projects.
0 0 0
Expenditure Total $ - $ - $ - The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

Financing Complete?
Public Facility - Library Fund (104)
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from Public Facility impact fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds are to only be used for new facilities for the Library, and not for operation and maintenance.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project. 196

8 197

9 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 79,075$
2015 COP Debt for VECC (principal + est. interest) (3,722,399) * Beginning Balance (3,643,324)
Revenue
Police Impact Fee 416,799
Investment Earnings (2,146) **
Total Revenues 414,653
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (802)
Debt Payment (414,541)
Total Expenditure (415,343)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 (3,644,014)
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 0
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 (3,644,014)
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 0
Future Revenue Needed 3,644,014$
Police Impact Fund (105)
Impact Fee Report 2021/22
* The 2015 COP Debt is for the Visalia Emergency Communication Center (VECC). The total debt financing for the VECC is 15 years and $23 million. Police Impact Fee Fund is responsible for

26.25%, or $6,123,721.31. The balance as of 6/30/22 is $3,307,858. ** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended. 198

10 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
105 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
This fund has no projects in FY 21/22.

Fund is contributing towards debt
service on the Visalia Emergency
Communication Center (VECC)
building.
0 0 0
Expenditure Total $ - $ - $ - The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project.

Financing Complete?
Police Impact Fund - 105
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from Public Safety impact fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds are to only be used for new facilities, equipment, and not for operation and maintenance.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
199

11 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 208,047$
Beginning Balance 208,047
Revenue
Fire Impact Fee 662,946
Investment Earnings (14,289) **
Total Revenues 648,657
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (2,476)
Interest Expense-General Fund Advance (448)
Capital Improvement Program (60,563)
Total Expenditure (63,488)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 793,216
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 (33,236)
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 759,980
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 (225,000) *
Future Revenue Needed -$
** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended.

Fire Impact Fund (106)
Impact Fee Report 2021/22
*A detail list of Future CIP projects is listed in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by Council June 2020 with the City's 2 Year Budget. 200

12 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
(All Funds)
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
106 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
Public Safety Traffic signal Pre-emption
System - Install Pre-emption Systems
in existing traffic signals. This system
allows emergency response vehicles to
control traffic signals along their route.
(CP9531 Multi-funded project)
125,225 (79,134) (60,563) X December 2022
Current Phase was awarded on 2/7/2022
council meeting, install devices on 15
intersections. Next phase will wait until
FY23/24 budget year.

Expenditure Total 125,225 (79,134) (60,563)
The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project.

Financing Complete?
Fire Impact Fund - 106
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from Public Safety impact fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds are to only be used for new facilities, equipment, and not for operation and maintenance.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
201

13 202

14 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 6,570,233$
Revenue
Investment Earnings (223,985) **
Park & Recreation Fees 2,708,970
Total Revenues 2,484,985
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (23,123)
Capital Improvement Program (147,560)
Total Expenditure (170,683)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 8,884,535
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 (3,868,567)
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 5,015,968
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 (60,510,800) *
Future Revenue Needed 55,494,832$
** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended.

Park & Recreation Facilities Fund (211)
Impact Fee Report 2021/22
* A detail list of Future CIP projects is listed in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by Council June 2020 with the City's 2 Year Budget. 203

15 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
211 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
East Side Regional Park & Ground
Water Recharge - Design and
environmental work for the East Side
Regional Park & Groundwater
Recharge Project.
(CP0123 - Multi-funded project)
1,278,879 (69,581) (55,056) X Not applicable
Environmental work consisting of the EIR
process is still in progress. Anticipated to
be completed by July 2023.

Construct East Side Regional Park
Basin G - Design and construction of
Park Basins
(CP0185 - Multi-funded project)
2,674,468 (81,824) (23,170) X 2023
Consultant to complete design and
permitting of basin G in fall 2022.

Construction of basin G to be complete end
of 2023.

Construct East Side Regional Park
Basin F/G - Design and construction of
Park Basins
(CP0371 - Multi-funded project)
6,112,760 (132,692) (68,486) X
Consultant to complete design of basin F in
2023.

East Side Basin D: Construction of
Basin D at the Eastside regional Park
(CP0396 - Multi-funded project)
2,653,384 (8,147) (83) X 2024
Preliminary Engineering and Design
started.

Financing Complete?
Park & Recreational Facilities Fund - 211 (continued on next page) Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund includes monies from fees paid by developers in lieu of providing parks and open space. Funds are to be used only for open space acquisition and providing park and other recreational facilities.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
204

16 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
211 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
Eastside Regional Park Basins: Design
and construction of four recharge
basins, providing approximately 50-
acres of groundwater recharge, and the
re-alignment of Mill Creek. Includes
design and construction of basins A, B,
C, E in accordance with the park's
master plan adopted August 2015.
(CP0424)
502,752 (764) (764) X
This project will be split into multipe CIP's to
account for multiple phases. The first phase
will be the design of Basin E and the
realigment of Mill Creek, which will be
tracked under a separte CIP in fiscal year
2023.

Expenditure Total 13,222,243 (293,009) (147,560)
The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project.

Park & Recreational Facilities Fund - 211 (continued from previous page) Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund includes monies from fees paid by developers in lieu of providing parks and open space. Funds are to be used only for open space acquisition and providing park and other recreational facilities.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity Financing Complete?
205

17 206

18 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 3,353,045$

Revenue
Storm Drain Impact Fees 1,164,393
Storm Master Plan Fees 528,151
Investment Earnings (115,098) **
Misc Revenues 74,559
Total Revenues 1,652,005
Expenditure
Operating Expeditures (321)
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (32,892)
Capital Improvement Program (493,769)
Total Expenditure (526,981)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 4,478,068
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 (1,417,755)
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 3,060,313
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 (15,335,100) *
Future Revenue Needed 12,274,787$
Storm Sewer Construction Fund (221)
* A detail list of Future CIP projects is listed in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by Council June 2020 with the City's 2 Year Budget. ** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended.

Impact Fee Report 2021/22
207

19 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
221 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Status
Storm Water Management Plan:

Develop a Citywide storm water
management plan (SWMP) for Visalia
(CP0227 - Multi-funded project)
398,978 (32,731) (344) X Not applicable
Consultant is approximately 95% complete
with scope of work. A few outreach materials
and training sessions to be conducted by
the consultant for the City still needed.

Anticipate to be completed in FY 22-23.

Auto Plaza Basin Expansion: to allow
expansion for needed capacity within
the Plaza Business Park and the
Square at Plaza Drive. (CP0302)
150,000 (627) (627) X TBD, contingent upon adjacent
development.

Goshen Ave Storm Drain Line - Burke St
to Ben Maddox Way - Extend existing
strom drain line. (CP0303)
798,000 (933) (933) X 2024
Construction anticipated 2024.

Storm Sewer Construction
Administration: Staff preliminary design
and administration of new storm sewer
construction projects as identified in the
Storm Sewer Master Plan. (CP8222)
10,000 (8,242) (8,242) X Not applicable
On-going storm sewer master plan
administration, including grant application
processing and implementation of the
existing master plan.

Financing Complete?
Storm Sewer Construction Fund - 221 (continued on next page) Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from Storm Sewer impact fees collected at the time of development. Funds are to be used only for construction of new storm sewer lines to implement the Storm Sewer Master Plan.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
208

20 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
221 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Status
Storm Sewer Master Plan Update:

Update the City's 1994 plan including
development impact fee update.
(CP9067)
576,849 (283,623) (283,623) X Not applicable
Project awarded to Carollo Engineers in
September 2018. Storm system modeling
and CIP development had many unexpected
delays. Draft master plan, nexus study, and
final draft still to be completed. Anticipate to
be completed 2023.

Storm Sewer Oversizing: Construct
various storm drain lines. (CP9229) 200,000 (200,000) (200,000) X On going for reimbursement to developers for storm sewer improvements
Expenditure Total 2,133,827 (526,156) (493,769)
Storm Sewer Construction Fund - 221 (continued from previous page) Project Status Report (FY 20/21)
This fund is derived from Storm Sewer impact fees collected at the time of development. Funds are to be used only for construction of new storm sewer lines to implement the Storm Sewer Master Plan.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity Financing Complete?
209

21 210

22 211

23 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 12,506,909$
Revenue
Investment Earnings (386,071) **
Trunk Line Capacity Fee 653,085
Front Footage Fee 592,932
Sewer Masterplan Fees 587,856
Total Revenues 1,447,802
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (41,856)
Capital Improvement Program (566,995)
Total Expenditure (608,852)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 13,345,859
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 (8,270,148)
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 5,075,711
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 (13,220,700) *
Future Revenue Needed 8,144,989$
Wastewater Trunk Line Construction (231)
* A detail list of Future CIP projects is listed in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by Council June 2020 with the City's 2 Year Budget.

Impact Fee Report 2021/22
** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended. 212

24 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
231 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
Sanitary Sewer Master Plan: Update the
City's Sanitary Sewer Collection System
Master Plan based on the prior master
plan. (CP0015)
350,987 (59,969) (59,969)
X
Not applicable Project awarded to Carollo Engineers in
September 2018. Sewer draft master plan
complete, Nexus Study and final draft
remaining. Delays caused in coordination
with Storm Sewer Master Plan Update
(CP9067).

Shirk Street and Walnut Ave traffic
signal: Install signal after the SCE
underground conversion and roadway
improvements are completed on Shirk
Street and Walnut Avenue. (CP0045 -
Multi-funded project)
1,321,900 (11,677) (4,828)
X
Fall 2023 Project design awarded to QK Inc in October
2019. Construction to begin in March 2023
with an approximate completion date of Fall
2023 .

Shirk Capacity Enhancement/Sewer
Trunk Line - extends sewer line from
School to Goshen and Goshen to
Riggin and widens Shirk from Goshen
to Riggin and Goshen to Hillsdale Ave
(CP0369 - Multi-funded project)
12,824,421 (728,767) (481,965)
X
Dec 2023 Design underway. Construction of sewer
truck line tentatively scheduled to begin early
2023. The capacity enhancement
construction tentatively scheduled to begin
Summer 2023.

Sewer Line Preliminary Engineering:

Preliminary engineering and design
work necessary to provide developers
and engineers with adequate
information to constuct master planned
sewer lines with proposed development
projects. (CP9234)
20,000 (20,233) (20,233)
X
Project ongoing.

Expenditure Total 14,497,308 (820,646) (566,995)
The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

Financing Complete?
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
Wastewater Trunk Line Construction Fund - 231
This fund's revenues are derived from Sanitary Sewer and Trunk Line Connection Fees. Funds are to be used only for new sanitary sewer trunk line construction, and not for operation and maintenance.

The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
213

25 214

26 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 761,854$
Beginning Balance 761,854
Revenue
Investment Earnings (33,793) **
Treatment Connection Fees 862,868
Total Revenues 829,075
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (997)
Total Expenditure (997)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 1,589,931
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 0
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 1,589,931
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 0 *
Future Revenue Needed -$
** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended.

Sewer Connection Fund (232)
Impact Fee Report 2021/22
* A detail list of Future CIP projects is listed in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by Council June 2020 with the City's 2 Year Budget. 215

27 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
232 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
This fund has no projects in FY 21/22
Fund has recently paid back a loan for
prior capital projects. Funding will be
used for evaluation of future needs ad
design of future Treatment Plant
expansion.
0 0 0
Expenditure Total $ - $ - $ - The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

Financing Complete?
Sewer Connection Fund (232)
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from Treatment Plant connection fees. They are to be used only for Treatment Plant expansions. Funds are not to be used for operation and maintenance.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project. 216

28 217

29 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 16,883,594$
Developer Contracts (1,336,919) *
Beginning Balance 15,546,675
Revenue
Investment Earnings (573,505) ***
Residential Impact Fees 3,526,608
Commercial Impact Fees 515,670
Industrial Impact Fees 2,474,870
Office Impact Fees 122,892
Institutional Impact Fees 89,900
Infill Credit Impact Fee (1,245)
Misc Revenue 55,588
Total Revenues 6,210,779
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (35,372)
Capital Improvement Program (3,040,445)
Total Expenditure (3,075,817)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 18,681,637
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 (12,071,049)
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 6,610,588
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 (62,026,500) **
Future Revenue Needed 55,415,912$
*** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended.

Transportation Impact Fund (241)
** A detail list of Future CIP projects is listed in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by Council June 2020 with the City's 2 Year Budget. * According to Resolution No. 2004-117 adopted by City council on October 18, 2004, the City will reimburse Developers for street improvements made to Arterial or Collector streets in accordance with the City's circulation element. The beginning balance at 7/1/21 for Developer Agreements is $1,336,919. During this fiscal year, $652,027.98 was paid to developers.

Impact Fee Report 2021/22
218

30 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
241 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
Stonebrook Crossing of Packwood
Creek: Construct Stonebrook street
culvert crossing (CP0043)
1,046,000 (53,952) (53,952) X Spring 2023
Design services contract awarded
November 2020 and currently underway.

Construction approximate completion date
of Spring 2023.

Shirk Street and Walnut Ave traffic
signal: Install signal after the SCE
underground conversion and roadway
improvements are completed on Shirk
Street and Walnut Avenue. (CP0045 -
Multi-funded project)
1,321,900 (11,677) (6,849) X
Fall 2023 Project design awarded to QK Inc in October
2019. Construction to begin in March 2023
with an approximate completion date of Fall
2023.

East Side Regional Park & Ground
Water Recharge - Design and
environmental work for the East Side
Regional Park & Groundwater
Recharge Project.
(CP0123 - Multi-funded project)
1,278,879 (69,581) (1,316) X Not applicable
Environmental work consisting of the EIR
process is still in progress. Anticipated to
be completed by July 2023.

Shirk St & Walnut Ave Roadway
Improvements: Complete roadway
projects along Shirk and Walnut.
(CP0196)
200,000 (1,019) (1,019) X Fall 2023
Construction to begin in March 2023 with an
approximate completion date of Fall 2023.

Tulare Ave at Santa Fe Roundabout -
The project will replace the existing all-
way stop at the intersection of Tulare
Avenue and Santa Fe Street with a
round-about. (CP0197 - Multi-funded
project)
4,347,600 (206,737) (250) X June 2021
Construction and Project Closeout.

Storm Water Management Plan:

Develop a Citywide storm water
management plan (SWMP) for Visalia
(CP0227 - Multi-funded project)
398,978 (32,731) (1,002) X Not applicable
Consultant is approximately 95% complete
with scope of work. A few outreach materials
and training sessions to be conducted by
the consultant for the City still needed.

Anticipate to be completed in FY 22-23.

Financing Complete?
Transportation Impact Fund - 241 (continued on next page - 1 of 3) Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds can be used only for new street improvements and expansion of transportation facilities related to growth.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
219

31 Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
241 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
Shirk Interchange at SR 198 ICE Study -
Work with CalTrans to go through the
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE)
process to prepare a study that
identifies near-term operation access
strategies and concepts to improve this
major intersection.
(CP0295 - Multi-funded project)
434,000 (14,855) (5,859) X Not applicable
Final edits to document being completed.

Feasibility Study to be issued end of 2022.

Shirk Street Widening over Mill Creek -
330 ft extension of the Shirk st culvert
(CP0305)
4,782,600 (7,901) (7,605) X 2023
Currently in design, environmental study
and regulatory permitting stages.

Construction anticipated to begin in late
summer 2023.

Houston-Santa Fe Roundabout
Landscaping - Design and install
irrigation and landscaping within the
Houston-Santa Fe roundabout. Design
will include maintenance access.
(CP0307)
69,500 (12,637) (12,637) X
Design underway. Preliminary concept plan
presented to City Council October 2020 for
direction. Concept plan presented to City
Council January 2022, Council authorized
landscape plan.

Santa Fe Environmental Cleanup -
Remove elevated railroad embankment
along the future Santa Fe Street
Corridor from Houston to Riggin to
correcting limited visibility for trail users.
(CP0308)
750,000 (46,641) (46,641) X
Preliminary design underway. Construction
anticipated for 2023.

Visalia Parkway Widening at Mooney
Blvd (SR-63): Widen to ultimate ROW
width (110') to accommodate 300' left
turn pocket on east and west bound
approaches to Mooney Blvd to reduce
delays. (CP0408)
2,875,000 (39,392) (12,313) X June 2023
Currently in the design phase. Construction
is anticipated to begin in December 2022
with approximate completion date of June
2023.

Transportation Impact Fund - 241 (continued on next page 2 of 3) Project Status Report (FY 20/21)
Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity Financing Complete?
220

32 Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
241 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
Signal Improvements on Riggin -
Construction of traffic signals at County
Center/Riggin and Giddings/Riggin.
(CP0459)
1,852,231 (427,603) (42,748) X October 2021
Project completed and is in the
maintenance period.

Reimburse developers - Reimburse
developers for additional costs incurred
when constructing required arterial &
collector streets with their development.
(CP9130)
3,509,398 (2,848,255) (2,848,255) X
Annual project to reimburse developers for
street over-sizing for Collector and Arterial
Streets.

Expenditure Total 22,866,086 (3,772,980) (3,040,445)
Project Status Report (FY 20/21)
Financing Complete?
Transportation Impact Fund - 241 (continued from previous page - 3 of 3) The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
221

33 222

34 223

35 224

36 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 3,101,041$
Revenue
Investment Earnings (156,370) **
Waterway Acquisition Fees 882,258
Total Revenues 725,888
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (8,186)
Capital Improvement Program (139,425)
Total Expenditure (147,612)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 3,679,317
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 (593,315)
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 3,086,002
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 (8,033,800) *
Future Revenue Needed 4,947,798$
Waterways Fund (261)
** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended. *A detail list of Future CIP projects is listed in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by Council June 2020 with the City's 2 Year Budget.

Impact Fee Report 2021/22
225

37 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
261 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
Packwood Trail including 3 sections:
design and construct class 1 trail along
Packwood Creek between Santa Fe and
Crumal. (CP0012 - Multi-funded project)
1,699,061 (1,198,319) (128,871) X
July 2022 Project construction is complete and in
close out phase.

East Side Regional Park & Ground
Water Recharge - Design and
environmental work for the East Side
Regional Park & Groundwater
Recharge Project.
(CP0123 - Multi-funded project)
1,278,879 (69,581) (1,353) X Not applicable
Environmental work consisting of the EIR
process is still in progress. Anticipated to
be completed by July 2023.

Construct East Side Regional Park
Basin G - Design and construction of
Park Basins
(CP0185 - Multi-funded project)
2,674,468 (81,824) (1,556) X 2023
Consultant to complete design and
permitting of Basin G in fall 2022.

Construction of basin G to be complete end
of 2023.

Construct East Side Regional Park
Basin F/G - Design and construction of
Park Basins
(CP0371 - Multi-funded project)
6,112,760 (132,692) (1,427) X
Consultant to complete design of basin F in
2023.

Financing Complete?
Waterways Fund - 261 (continued on next page)
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from a combination of monthly storm sewer rates and developer impact fees. The funds are restricted for acquisition of development setbacks along waterways designated in the Visalia General Plan, restoration of riparian vegetation, and maintenance of the setback areas.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
226

38 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
261 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
East Side Basin D: Construction of
Basin D at the Eastside regional Park
(CP0396 - Multi-funded project)
2,653,384 (8,147) (23) X
2024 Preliminary Engineering and Design
started.

St Johns Bike/Pedestrain Trail - Riggin
to Dinuba Blvd: Design and construct
trail along St Johns River between
Riggin and Dinuba Blvd. (CP8131 - Multi-
funded project)
1,763,802 (132,548) (6,196) X
November 2022 Trail construction is complete. Landscaping phase underway, pending additional funds.

Expenditure Total 16,182,354 (1,623,111) (139,425)
Financing Complete?
The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources.

The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project.

Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
Waterways Fund - 261 (continued from previous page)
This fund is derived from a combination of monthly storm sewer rates and developer impact fees. The funds are restricted for acquisition of development Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
227

39 228

40 AB1600 Actuals
Beginning Cash Balance 7/1/21 666,621$
Revenue
Investment Earnings (20,077) **
Northeast Landscaping 14,346
Northeast Sidewalk/Bikepath 2,651
Northeast Storm Drain 33,214
Northeast Block Walls 7,290
Northeast Medians 1,362
Northeast Parks 1,686
Northeast Financing Costs 1,472
Total Revenues 41,944
Expenditure
Servicing Fees/Audit/Revenue/Accounting (1,477)
Total Expenditure (1,477)
Ending Cash Balance 6/30/22 707,088
C.I.P Money Appropriated 6/30/22 (700,000)
Ending Resources Available 6/30/22 7,088
Future C.I.P. Projects 2022/23-2027/28 0 *
Future Revenue Needed -$
Northeast Capital Improvement Fund (291)
*A detail list of Future CIP projects is listed in the attached 6 Year Capital Improvement Program that was approved by Council June 2020 with the City's 2 Year Budget.

Impact Fee Report 2021/22
** Interest earnings for FY21/22 ended with a negative amount due to the fair market value adjustment on our investments held at year end as required by GASB31. The fair market value adjustment reduces or increases interest earnings for the year. This year, due to the historic rapid increase of the Federal Funds Rate by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to help combat inflation, our investments were valued less than what will be received for them when they mature (par value). This adjustment is a book entry only and the City will receive the full value of its investment at maturity as intended.
229

41 Fund Description
Number
Total Project
Appropriation
Total
Fiscal Year
Expenditures
291 Fund
Expenditures Yes No
If Yes, Approx.

Construction Date Project Current Status
This fund has no projects in FY 21/22 0 0 0 X
Expenditure Total 0 0 0
The column labeled "fund expenditures" includes only expenditures from this fund.

Note: Projects that are labeled "multi-funded" have multiple funds contributing towards the project.

Financing Complete?
Northeast Capital Improvement Fund (291)
Project Status Report (FY 21/22)
This fund is derived from fees paid by developers, builders, and sub dividers for projects located in the Northeast Specific Plan Area to fund the construction of storm drain facilities, parks, bike paths, medians, block walls, landscaping, and amenities identified in the Northeast Specific Plan.

Fiscal Year 21/22 Activity
The column labeled "Total fiscal year expenditures" includes expenditures from all funding sources. 230

42 231

43 Attachment
City of Visalia 6 year Capital Improvement Program

232

44 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Beginning Cash Balance 965,300 1,072,700 1,182,800 1,295,100 1,409,700 (110,900) Impact F ees and Interest Earnings 109,700 112,400 114,600 116,900 119,200 121,600 Allocations (2,300) (2,300) (2,300) (2,300) (2,300) (2,300) Capital Improvements 0 0 0 0 (1,637,500) 0
Total Resources Available for F uture Projects 1,072,700 1,182,800 1,295,100 1,409,700 (110,900) 8,400 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
1 Corp Yard New Site Development: Improvements to the
property acquired from SCE at NW corner of the CY.

Includes grading, NPDES permit requirements, paving,
striping, utilities and lighting. Requires demolition of the existing Streets Building, which includes relocation of utilities, removing the building and foundation, soil import, grading, and compaction. Improvements to the existing
storm drainage system at the CY to provide grease &
sediment treatment. Provides compliance with CA's
requirement to control site storm drainage; and improve mobility of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Multi-funded in the amount of $4.7m funded from $1.6m CY Impact Fee
(103), and $3.07m Solid Waste (441).

Nick
Mas cia
NEW
(3010) $ B4 1,637,500
0 0 0 0 1,637,500 0
Notes: Multi-funded means this is only this fund's portion of the total amount budgeted. These projects are funded from multiple sources and the full budget is shown in the "Multi-Fund 301".

The Budget Impact column shows the estimated annual impact of the project on the operating budget for maintenance once completed or purchased. - - No Annual Maintenance Costs (or no increase over existing cost) $$$ Annual Maintenance costs is over $25,000. These projects will be explained in detail in the project description. $ Annual Maintenance cost is $5,000 or less $$$$ Project will result in savings as described in project description $$ Annual Maintenance costs is $5,000 to $25,000
Corporation Yard Impact F ee - 103 (2330)
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
This fund is derived from Corporation Yard Impact fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds are to only be used for new facilities, equipment, and not for operation and maintenance.

Cash Balance Summary
233

45 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Beginning Cash Balance 639,600 1,176,400 1,649,000 2,207,500 2,702,200 3,283,300 Impact F ee Revenues 541,100 551,900 562,900 574,200 585,700 597,400 Operating and Allocations (4,300) (4,300) (4,400) (4,500) (4,600) (4,700) Capital Improvements 0 (75,000) 0 (75,000) 0 (75,000)
Total Resources Available for F uture Projects 1,176,400 1,649,000 2,207,500 2,702,200 3,283,300 3,801,000 Deferred Projects Waiting on Funding (Shaded section below) Funding Deficit Including Unfunded Projects 1,176,400 1,649,000 2,207,500 2,702,200 3,283,300 3,801,000 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
1 Public Safety Traffic Signal Pre-emption System: Install three(3) Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption Systems (EVP's)
at existing traffic signals at various locations throughout the City every other year. This system allows emergency
response vehicles to control traffic signals along their route.

Newer traffic signals have EVPs included; however, there are approximately 45 existing traffic signals within the City without an EVP system. (Multi-funded: $100k every other year from $75k Fire Impact Fees (106) and $25k General
Fund (001).) Casey Chu
CP9531
(3010) - - N/ A 75,000 75,000 75,000
0 75,000 0 75,000 0 75,000
Notes: Multi-funded means this is only this fund's portion of the total amount budgeted. These projects are funded from multiple sources and the full budget is shown in the "Multi-Fund 301".

The Budget Impact column shows the estimated annual impact of the project on the operating budget for maintenance once completed or purchased. - - No Annual Maintenance Costs (or no increase over existing cost) $$$ Annual Maintenance costs is over $25,000. These projects will be explained in detail in the project description. $ Annual Maintenance cost is $5,000 or less $$$$ Project will result in savings as described in project description $$ Annual Maintenance costs is $5,000 to $25,000
Additional Information:

F ire Impact F ee - 106 (2360)
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
This fund is derived from Fire Impact fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds are to only be used for new facilities, equipment, and not for operation and maintenance.

Cash Balance Summary
234

46 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Beginning Cash Balance 5,900,400 4,139,000 3,564,100 (5,188,900) (9,727,300) (28,115,900) Park and Recreational Impact F ees 1,960,000 1,999,200 2,039,200 2,080,000 2,121,600 2,164,000 Interest Earnings 20,000 20,000 17,800 (25,900) (48,600) (140,600) Operating Expenditures (21,400) (21,400) (21,800) (22,200) (22,600) (23,100) Capital Improvements (3,720,000) (2,572,700) (10,788,200) (6,570,300) (20,439,000) (16,420,600) Total Resources Available for F uture Projects 4,139,000 3,564,100 (5,188,900) (9,727,300) (28,115,900) (42,536,200) # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
1 3-5 Acre Neighborhood Park: Develop a specific plan to acquire land, design, and build a neighborhood park of 3-5 acres in the northwest quadrant of the City located in
accordance with the General Plan's element on Park and
Recreation Facilities and development trends Park
improvements to include walking paths, playground, picnic area, and open turf. Funding for design to begin in 2022-23 with construction to follow in 2023-24. Annual maintenance costs for this park are estimated to be $74k per year.

Jeremy Rogers CP0425 $$$ N/A 1,540,000
2 3-Acre Neighborhood Park: Per the general plan the City will acquire land, design, and build a 3-acre neighborhood park in the northeast portion of the City. Neighborhood Parks are intended to provide basic recreation activities for one or more neighborhoods with a service area of one half to one mile radius. Neighborhood parks usually include
playgrounds, picnic tables, benches, and walkways. This location will be designed to include a Splash Pad. Annual maintenance costs for this park are estimated to be $74k per year.

Jeremy Rogers CP0563 $$$ N/A 1,200,000 1,275,000
3 Cameron Creek Regional Park/Basin: Acquire site for a 5.25 acre storm/recharge park, 4 acre park, and half mile asphalt trail along southerly extension of McAuliff adjacent to Cameron Creek. To serve existing and future development within the one-mile development block of Lovers Lane to Road 148 and Caldwell to Walnut. May also receive TID
exchange water from Cameron Creek, through development
of a later project. Geotechnical testing will be required to determine eligibility for ground water recharge funding. (Multi-funded: Project total $2.7m from $1.6m Parks & Rec (211), $558K Storm Sewer (221) and $558k GW Recharge
(224)). Annual maintenance costs for this park are
estimated to be $116k per year.

Cody
McLaughlin
CP0517
(3010) $$$ D4 537,000 1,136,900
Recreation F acilities - 211 (2440)
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
This fund is derived from impact fees paid by developers in lieu of providing parks and open space. Funds are to be used to implement the Parks Master Plan for open space acquisition and providing park and other recreational facilities.

Cash Balance Summary
235

47 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
4 Basin E & Mill Creek Realignment (Design): FY22/23-23/24 Design of Basin E & Realignment of Mill Creek. Basin will provide a 12 acre basin for rehcarge purposes. The
realignment of approximately 15 acres of Mill Creek will provide passive, riparian open space that can be enjoyed by the public and will provide an inviting habitat for native species. Design will include storm water components such large diameter pipe, structures, and trails. A seperate CIP request for constrution is proposed for FY 24/25 which will be deferred. pending available funds. Multi-funded project total of $841k funded from $286k Recreation Facilties (211), $84k Groundwater Recharge (224), and $471k Waterway
Construction (261).

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0518
(3010) - - B12 286,000
5 East Side Regional Park EIR: Design and environmental work consisting of park master planning, preliminary
engineering for recharge facilities and project level EIR. The completed design and environmental work will put the
project in a good position to seek grant funding
opportunities with a well planned package. The additional appropriation is needed to add a noise study and to expand the traffic impact study to meet Caltrans' requirements for impacts to SR-198 and SR-216. Multi funded Project total of $100k is funded from $75k Park Impact Fee (211), $21k
Groundwater Recharge (224), $2k Transportation Impact
(241) and $2k Waterways (261), all of which includes prior year funding.

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0123
(3010) - - N/A 75,000
6 Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Update: This project provides funding for professional services to review and update the Recreation Facilities Impact Fee charged to
developers. Jeremy Rogers CP0564 - - N/A 50,000
7 Northside Scenic Corridor - Hillsdale Park/Storm Basin:

Develop Northside Highway 198 Open Space Setback Area
(east of Shirk) to serve as passive open space and naturally shaped drainage basin for existing and planned
development north of Highway 198 and both east and west of Shirk Street. Basin could receive water from Mill Creek for storm layoff and recharge purposes. Development of this is the first section of setback will include planning for other setback areas to the south and the west. (Multi Funded:

Total of $6.33m, including prior year funding, from $2.65m Storm Sewer (221), $1.77m Parks & Recreation (211), $1m Transportation Impact (241), and $900k Waterways Capital (261).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
CP9719
(3010) $$ A3 32,000 383,200 1,102,000
Recreation F acilities - 211 (2440) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
236

48 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
8 5-Acre Neighborhood Park: Per the general plan the City will aquire land, design, and build a 5-acre neighborhood park.

Neighborhood Parks are intended to provide basic recration activities for one or more neightborhoods with a service area of one half to one mile radius. Neighborhood parks usually include playgrounds, picnic tables, benches, and walkways. Annual maintenance costs for this park are
estimated to be $74k per year.

Jeremy Rogers CP0565 $$$ N/A 1,200,000 800,000
9 Tower Street-Mineral King to St. John's Parkway (Prelim Design): Preliminary design for construction of
approximately 6,400 ft of Tower Street from Mineral King to St. John's Parkway, excluding the new Interchange to SR 198 for access to park/basins. Will be a 4-lane, north-south arterial along the Rd 148 alignment, in coordination with future interchange at SR 198 and SR216 (Houston Ave); the SCE towers; and the Greenway Trail. Includes construction of new culvert crossing Mill Creek (Army Corp Permit).

Development in east Visalia, around SR 198, requires
another north/south arterial. No construction funds in this project. Multi funded project total of $194k from $96k
Transportation Impact (241) and $97k Parks & Rec (211).

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0525
(3010) - - B8 97,700
10 15-Acre Community Park: Per the general plan the City will aquire land, design, and build a 15 arce community park.

Community Parks are intended to serve the recreational
needs of a larger area of the city, especially those living or working within a two-mile radius. These parks may include facilities such as sport fields, exercise courses, recreation buildings, and restrooms. Annual maintenance costs for this park are estimated to be $221k per year.

Jeremy Rogers NEW $$$ N/A 3,600,000 2,400,000
11 Eastside Regional Park Design and Infrastructure: Design for construction of a 242-acre regional park on the East side of Visalia comprised of park, recreation, and groundwater recharge facilities in accordance with the Master Plan
adopted August 2015. Park Improvements include walking paths, playground, picnic area, open turf, recreational facilities, and an archery range. Phase 1) Preliminary engineering, architectural planning, development of
estimates of the park site and facilities; and Phase 2) Engineering design and construction of the park's backbone infrastructure (roads, utilities, etc). Project to be coordinated with the engineering design of the park's
required adjacent infrastructure (Tower Rd) and recharge basins (A, B, C, E) included
as seperateCIP's.

Rebecca
Keenan NEW B12 2,462,900
Recreation F acilities - 211 (2440) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
237

49 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
12 Basin E & Mill Creek Realignment (Construction): For construction of Basin E & Mill Creek Realignment. Basin will provide a 12 acre basin for rehcarge purposes. The
realignment of approximately 15 acres of Mill Creek will provide passive, riparian open space that can be enjoyed by the public and will provide an inviting habitat for native species. Project will include storm water components such large diameter pipe, structures, and trails. Multi-funded project total of $4.69m from $1.59m Recreation Facilities (211), $469k Ground Water Recharge (224), and $2.63m
Waterway Construction (261). Annual maintenance cost for this basin is estimated to be $86k per year.

Rebecca
Keenan
NEW
(3010) $$$ B12 1,594,600
13 ESRP On-Site Infrastructure: On-site infrastructure at the East Side Regional Park, including design, environmental, permitting, construction of interior roads, McKinley Ave. (4,400 LF) and Villoy Ave. (3,000 LF). To include utilities (water, electric, gas, sanitary sewer), streets and lighting within the park. Excludes play fields, buildings, and other public recreation facilities. FY23/24- 25/26 topo survey, CEQA, design, estimating, permitting; approx. $1M. FY26/27- 27/28 Construction, approximately $11.8M. This project will build the backbone infrastructure to allow further
development of open space for passive recreation, ground water recharge basins, and park amenities at the East Side Regional Park.

Rebecca
Keenan NEW $ B12 817,100 198,200 11,818,600
14 Cameron Creek Park/Basin: Locate and acquire site for an 10-11 acre neighborhood park and storm/recharge basin
north of Caldwell Avenue adjacent to Cameron Creek. The facility will also be able to receive TID exchange water through Cameron Creek, through development of a later
project. Geotechnical testing will be required to determine soil infiltration characteristics for ground water recharge purposes and eligibility for ground water recharge funding. (Multi-funded: Project total $4.9m: $2.28m from Recreation (211), $1.34m from Storm Sewer (221) and $1.34m GW
Recharge (224)). Annual maintenance cost for this basin is estimated to be $86k per year.

Cody
McLaughlin
NEW
(3010) $$$ N/A 494,500 1,788,300
15 Southside Scenic Corridor: Develop basin on south side of SR-198, east of Shirk St as linear, landscaped basin with functional passive open space to receive City storm water flows from Mill Creek through either Persian-Watson Ditch or a pipeline to the north under SR-198. Phase 1,
implement with Sierra Village development expansion to
relocate existing City basin. Requires acquisition of 20 acres to the east of Phase 1 improvements. Included in the west side storm water lay-off plan. Multi funded project total of $4.3m from $1.4m Parks & Rec (211) , $2.2m Storm
Sewer Construction (221), and $580k Transportation Impact (241).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
NEW
(3010) $ C8 299,000 257,400 211,000 721,400
Recreation F acilities - 211 (2440) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
238

50 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
16 Basins A, B, and C East Side Regional Park: For Design & Construction to provide approximately 30-acres of
groundwater recharge. Includes demolition of existing
orchards, earthwork, piping structures, recharge system, trails, landscaping. Provides passive, riparian open space.

Phased as: FY25/26-26/27 Design Basins A, B, & C;
FY27/28 Construction Basins A, B, & C. Completion of this CIP and separate CIP Basin E + Mill Creek realignment will result in an increase of 42-acres of groundwater recharge.

Multi-funded project total of $6.7m from $3.2m Recreation Facilities (211, $3.35m Groundwater Recharge (224), and $134k Waterway Construction (261). Annual maintenance
cost for this basin is estimated to be $35k per year.

Rebecca
Keenan
NEW
(3010) $$$ B12 518,400 2,696,600
17 Northside Scenic Corridor West of Shirk: Northside Highway 198 Open Space Setback Area (west of Shirk) - Acquisition of approximately 30.1 acres land from three existing parcels needed for the northwest scenic setback area and riparian setback from Mill Creek to continue development of the corridor as passive recreational open space and drainage basin. The basin is planned to serve existing and planned development north of Highway 198 between Clancy and
Shirk. Acquisition of land for the northwest portion of the scenic corridor (between Clancy and Shirk) to start in 25/26 starting at Clancy and heading east, acquiring from one parcel per year. Multi funded project total of $3.07m from $868k Parks & Rec (211), $1.3m Storm Sewer Construction (221), and $900k Waterways Capital (261).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
NEW
(3010) $$ A4 256,000 228,000 384,000
18 New Recreation Center: This project will include the construction of an indoor recreational facility at a site to be later determined. Annual maintenance costs for this facility are estimated to be $450k per year. Jeremy Rogers NEW $$$ N/A 50,000 20,000,000 3,720,000 2,572,700 10,788,200 6,570,300 20,439,000 16,420,600 Notes: Multi-funded means this is only this fund's portion of the total amount budgeted. These projects are funded from multiple sources and the full budget is shown in the "Multi-Fund 301".

The Budget Impact column shows the estimated annual impact of the project on the operating budget for maintenance once completed or purchased. - - No Annual Maintenance Costs (or no increase over existing cost) $$$ Annual Maintenance costs is over $25,000. These projects will be explained in detail in the project description. $ Annual Maintenance cost is $5,000 or less $$$$ Project will result in savings as described in project description $$ Annual Maintenance costs is $5,000 to $25,000
Recreation F acilities - 211 (2440) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
239

51 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Beginning Cash Balance 2,612,400 2,426,200 3,379,500 1,154,500 (2,675,600) (2,245,200) Utility User and Developer Impact F ees 1,229,700 1,252,800 1,277,900 1,303,500 1,329,600 1,356,200 Operating Expenditures (staff costs, allocations, etc.) (28,900) (28,900) (29,500) (30,100) (30,700) (31,300) Capital Improvements (1,387,000) (270,600) (3,473,400) (5,103,500) (868,500) (2,432,100) Total Resources Available for F uture Projects 2,426,200 3,379,500 1,154,500 (2,675,600) (2,245,200) (3,352,400) # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
1 Storm Sewer Oversizing: Construct various storm drain lines. Pays the City's annual cost of reimbursing developers for the design and construction of storm drain lines which implement the Storm Water Master Plan. To implement
necessary Storm Sewer Master improvements and
reimburse developers for implementation of Master Plan.

Paul Bernal CP9229 - - N/A 1,100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2 Cameron Creek Regional Park/Basin: Acquire site for a 5.25 acre storm/recharge park, 4 acre park, and half mile asphalt trail along southerly extension of McAuliff adjacent to Cameron Creek. To serve existing and future development within the one-mile development block of Lovers Lane to Road 148 and Caldwell to Walnut. May also receive TID
exchange water from Cameron Creek, through development
of a later project. Geotechnical testing will be required to determine eligibility for ground water recharge funding. (Multi-funded: Project total $2.7m from $1.6m Parks & Rec (211), $558K Storm Sewer (221) and $558k GW Recharge
(224)). Annual maintenance costs for this park are
estimated to be $116k per year.

Cody
McLaughlin
CP0517
(3010) $$$ D4 179,000 379,000
3 Highland St. Storm Drain: Install a storm drain line along Highland St alignment from Ferguson Ave to connect to an existing 48" storm main in front of Highland Gardens
development and connect the line into Fairview Park/Basin.

In addition, expand the storage capacity of the Park/Basin, and incorporate water quality into the expanded basin
design. This project includes design, construction, and additional excavation to provide additional storage capacity.

Multi funded project total of $880k from $352k Storm Sewer Construction (221) and $528k Storm Sewer Deficiency
(222).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
CP9796
(3010) $ B9 60,600 291,700
Storm Sewer - 221 (2450)
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
This fund is derived from Storm Sewer impact fees collected at the time of development and a portion of the monthly storm sewer users fees. This fund shares $.84 of the $2.59 monthly storm sewer fee with the Wastewater Trunkline construction fund (1231). Funds are to be used only for construction of new storm sewer infrastructure to implement the Storm Sewer Master Plan.

Cash Balance Summary
240

52 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
4 Auto Plaza Basin Expansion: Acquire an additional 3.5 acres to the west of the current basin site to allow the basin to be expanded in capacity. The Auto Plaza Basin was
originally designed to be a detention basin with a discharge pump, the design has been changed to be a retention basin with no pump to serve a larger regional area. These
changes require the basin to be expanded to provide the needed capacity within the Plaza Business Park and The
Square at Plaza Drive master planned projects. Project total of $1.1m, including prior year funding of $150K from Storm Sewer Construction (221).

Cody
McLaughlin CP0302 $ A5 50,000 946,500
5 Northside Scenic Corridor - Hillsdale Park/Storm Basin:

Develop Northside Highway 198 Open Space Setback Area
(east of Shirk) to serve as passive open space and naturally shaped drainage basin for existing and planned
development north of Highway 198 and both east and west of Shirk Street. Basin could receive water from Mill Creek for storm layoff and recharge purposes. Development of this is the first section of setback will include planning for other setback areas to the south and the west. (Multi Funded:

Total of $6.33m, including prior year funding, from $2.65m Storm Sewer (221), $1.77m Parks & Recreation (211), $1m Transportation Impact (241), and $900k Waterways Capital (261).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
CP9719
(3010) $$ A3 48,000 574,800 1,653,000
6 Storm Sewer Construction Administration: Staff preliminary design and administration of new storm sewer construction projects as identified in the Strom Sewer Master Plan. To implement necessary Storm Sewer Master improvements
for implementation of the Master Plan. (Note: Annual
project. Prior year funds are not typically rolled over.) Frank Senteno CP8222 - - N/A 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 7 Northside Scenic Corridor West of Shirk: Northside Highway 198 Open Space Setback Area (west of Shirk) - Acquisition of approximately 30.1 acres land from three existing parcels needed for the northwest scenic setback area and riparian setback from Mill Creek to continue development of the corridor as passive recreational open space and drainage basin. The basin is planned to serve existing and planned development north of Highway 198 between Clancy and
Shirk. Acquisition of land for the northwest portion of the scenic corridor (between Clancy and Shirk) to start in 25/26 starting at Clancy and heading east, acquiring from one parcel per year. Multi funded project total of $3.07m from $868k Parks & Rec (211), $1.3m Storm Sewer Construction (221), and $900k Waterways Capital (261).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
NEW
(3010) $$ A4 384,000 342,000 576,000
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
Storm Sewer - 221 (2450) - Continued
241

53 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
8 Southside Scenic Corridor: Develop basin on south side of SR-198, east of Shirk St as linear, landscaped basin with functional passive open space to receive City storm water flows from Mill Creek through either Persian-Watson Ditch or a pipeline to the north under SR-198. Phase 1,
implement with Sierra Village development expansion to
relocate existing City basin. Requires acquisition of 20 acres to the east of Phase 1 improvements. Included in the west side storm water lay-off plan. Multi funded project total of $4.3m from $1.4m Parks & Rec (211) , $2.2m Storm
Sewer Construction (221), and $580k Transportation Impact (241).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
NEW
(3010) $ C8 448,500 386,100 316,500 1,082,100
9 North Shirk Storm Drain Line Extension: Extend the existing 48" storm drain line in Hillsdale Avenue north on Shirk Street for 2,800 feet with pipe sizes to vary from 36" to 48".

The existing temporary basin on the south side of Hillsdale Avenue will need to be expanded for the additional
stormwater runoff resulting from the project or be
discharged into the fully developed naturally shaped basin per the Northside Scenic Corridor Park & Basin project
(CP9719) . This project will be completed in coordination with the Shirk Widening project (CP0369).

Chantha Chap NEW - - A6 375,700 1,377,500
10 Cameron Creek Park/Basin: Locate and acquire site for an 10-11 acre neighborhood park and storm/recharge basin
north of Caldwell Avenue adjacent to Cameron Creek. The facility will also be able to receive TID exchange water through Cameron Creek, through development of a later
project. Geotechnical testing will be required to determine soil infiltration characteristics for ground water recharge purposes and eligibility for ground water recharge funding. (Multi-funded: Project total $4.9m: $2.28m from Recreation (211), $1.34m from Storm Sewer (221) and $1.34m GW
Recharge (224)). Annual maintenance cost for this basin is estimated to be $86k per year.

Cody
McLaughlin
NEW
(3010) $$$ N/A 247,200 1,092,900
Storm Sewer - 221 (2450) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
242

54 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
11 Storm Drain and Sewer Master Plan Update: Update the Storm and Sanitary Sewer Master Plans. Facility Master
Plans should be updated every 5 years to incorporate any changes in infrastructure, land use, and environmental
conditions. Includes new nexus study for storm and sanitary sewer impact and utility fee updates and CEQA review.

Current update to the facility master plan to be implemented in 22/23, updating the storm and sewer master plans since 1994. Multi-funded project total of $940k from $564k Storm Sewer Construction (221), and $376k Wastewater Trunkline (231).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
NEW
(3010) - - N/A 564,000
1,387,000 270,600 3,473,400 5,103,500 868,500 2,432,100 Notes: Multi-funded means this is only this fund's portion of the total amount budgeted. These projects are funded from multiple sources and the full budget is shown in the "Multi-Fund 301".

The Budget Impact column shows the estimated annual impact of the project on the operating budget for maintenance once completed or purchased. - - No Annual Maintenance Costs (or no increase over existing cost) $$$ Annual Maintenance costs is over $25,000. These projects will be explained in detail in the project description. $ Annual Maintenance cost is $5,000 or less $$$$ Project will result in savings as described in project description $$ Annual Maintenance costs is $5,000 to $25,000
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
Storm Sewer - 221 (2450) - Continued
243

55 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Beginning Cash Balance 4,916,400 5,465,900 3,240,800 1,551,100 22,300 488,800 Sanitary Sewer and Trunk Line Connection Fees 802,500 818,500 834,900 851,600 868,600 886,000 Sewer Master Plan F ees 605,400 617,500 629,900 642,500 655,400 668,500 Interest Earnings 27,200 16,100 7,700 100 2,400 1,900
Operating Expenditures (staff costs, allocations, etc.) (41,400) (41,400) (42,200) (43,000) (43,900) (44,800) Capital Improvements (844,200) (3,635,800) (3,120,000) (2,980,000) (1,016,000) (1,624,700) Total Resources Available for F uture Projects 5,465,900 3,240,800 1,551,100 22,300 488,800 375,700 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
1 American Street Trunk Extension: Project consists of 5,200 feet of 30-inch diameter pipeline in American Street (Road 76). The project extends from Riggin Ave. to Ave. 320 and will serve the industrial zoned area of the City. This trunk is needed to serve emerging industrial development between Riggin Avenue and Avenue 320; areas within the Industrial Land Use Zone and Tiers 1 and 3 Urban Development
Boundary Areas. The line will terminate at Ave 320
(boundary of the sphere of influence) and have the
capability to serve future industrial within the City's planning Area.

Katherine
Woodhull-
Fuget CP0566 - - A1 714,200 3,120,800
2 Sanitary Sewer Developer Reimbursement: Reimburse
developers for sanitary sewer- additional costs incurred when constructing the required sanitary sewer with
development. The additional cost is the difference between the "development requirement" and the requirement to
accommodate for future development in the area. To
implement Sewer Line Master Plan. Paul Bernal CP9318 - - N/A 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 3 Sewer Line Preliminary Engineering: Preliminary
engineering and design work necessary to provide
developers and engineers with adequate information to
construct master planned sewer lines with proposed
development projects. Implement Sewer Line Master Plan.

Frank
Senteno CP9234 - - N/A 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Wastewater Trunkline - 231 (2490)
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
This fund's revenues are derived from Sanitary Sewer and Trunk Line Connection Fees. Funds are to be used only for new sanitary sewer trunk line construction, and not for operation and maintenance. This fund also receives a portion of the monthly storm sewer users fees, sharing $.84 of the $2.59 monthly storm sewer fee with the Storm Sewer Construction fund (221).

Cash Balance Summary
244

56 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
4 Shirk St. Sanitary Sewer Trunkline - Walnut to Noble: This project is to install a 48" sanitary sewer trunk line in Shirk Street between Walnut Avenue and Noble Avenue. This will connect the existing sewer trunkline within Shirk Street south of Hwy-198 to the existing sewer trunkline in Walnut Avenue. Project will remove the existing 6" sewer force main and the associated lift station located at Shirk Street and Noble Avenue. The replacement of the line is identified in the City's Sewer Master Plan and will provide the
necessary wastewater conveyance capacity to
accommodate future development growth.

Eric Bons CP0567 - - C2 385,000 2,990,000 2,850,000
5 Visalia Parkway Trunkline - Santa Fe to Lovers Lane:

Construct a new 30" sanitary sewer trunkline along the
Visalia Parkway (Ave. 276) alignment between Santa Fe
Street and Lovers Lane. Right of Way will need to be
acquired. Project will include new trunkline at a depth of approximately 17-feet, new 60" manholes, clearing &
grubbing, demolition, sheet & shoring, and some bores
under existing creeks and ditches. FY 26/27-28/29, Design & RW $3.12M. FY 29/30-30/31, Construction $5.26M.

Trunkline will serve parcels in Tier 3.

Rebecca
Keenan NEW - - D2 886,000 1,118,700
6 Storm Drain and Sewer Master Plan Update: Update the Storm and Sanitary Sewer Master Plans. Facility Master
Plans should be updated every 5 years to incorporate any changes in infrastructure, land use, and environmental
conditions. Includes new nexus study for storm and sanitary sewer impact and utility fee updates and CEQA review.

Current update to the facility master plan to be implemented in 22/23, updating the storm and sewer master plans since 1994. Multi-funded project total of $940k from $564k Storm Sewer Construction (221), and $376k Wastewater Trunkline (231).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
NEW
(3010) - - N/A 376,000
844,200 3,635,800 3,120,000 2,980,000 1,016,000 1,624,700 Notes: Multi-funded means this is only this fund's portion of the total amount budgeted. These projects are funded from multiple sources and the full budget is shown in the "Multi-Fund 301".

The Budget Impact column shows the estimated annual impact of the project on the operating budget for maintenance once completed or purchased. - - No Annual Maintenance Costs (or no increase over existing cost) $$$ Annual Maintenance costs is over $25,000. These projects will be explained in detail in the project description. $ Annual Maintenance cost is $5,000 or less $$$$ Project will result in savings as described in project description $$ Annual Maintenance costs is $5,000 to $25,000
Wastewater Trunkline - 231 (2490) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
245

57 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Beginning Cash Balance 6,916,800 6,265,400 7,453,000 8,685,800 (2,363,000) (6,854,700) Transportation Impact Fees 6,263,100 6,388,400 6,516,200 6,646,500 6,779,400 6,915,000 Interest Earnings (Expense) 100,000 73,800 86,000 (23,400) (67,900) (156,500) Operating Expenditures and Allocations (35,300) (35,300) (36,000) (36,700) (37,400) (38,100) Capital Improvements (6,979,200) (5,239,300) (5,333,400) (17,635,200) (11,165,800) (15,673,600) Total Resources Available for F uture Projects 6,265,400 7,453,000 8,685,800 (2,363,000) (6,854,700) (15,807,900) # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
1 Riggin Widening - Kelsey to Shirk: Widen Riggin Ave between Kelsey Street and Shirk Road from an undivided
two-lane road to a four-lane divided road with median.

Install drainage swale, street lights and interconnect
conduit. Project will move forward once EDA grant is
received and bonding from TCAG is successful. Widening of Riggin Ave will improve mobility of traffic for the industrial park and the surrounding businesses while reducing
congestion. Multi funded project total of $10.975m from $2.2m Meas R Regional prior year (133), $4.77m
Transportation Impact ($2.4m prior year) (241), and $4m EDA Grant, contingent upon award (281).

Diego Corvera
CP0398
(3010) $$ A11 2,375,000
2 Santa Fe Environmental Cleanup: Project includes
removing the elevated railroad embankment along the
future Santa Fe Street Corridor from Houston to Riggin. The corridor will be excavated down to a preliminary grading limit so that there will be minimal earthwork for the construction of Santa Fe Street. The elevated railroad embankment runs parallel to the trail currently under construction along the eastern most portion of the future street and rises over the trail 4-5' in some locations. This presents a safety concern with limited visibility for trail users. This project will simplify the future street project. Project total of $2.6m includes prior year funding of $750K.

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget CP0308 $ B18 1,886,200
3 Developer Reimbursements: This CIP is for
reimbursement of public assets constructed in the public right of way. The continued and ongoing maintenance of the improvements completed under this CIP is maintained by a separate City CIP. Paul Bernal CP9130 - - N/A 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 Transportation Impact F ees - 241 (2520)
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
This fund is derived from fees collected at the time of building permit issuance. Funds can be used only for new street improvements and expansion of transportation facilities related to growth.

Cash Balance Summary
246

58 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
4 Visalia Parkway Improvements-North Half: Extend Visalia Parkway between Stonebrook Street and Court Street.

Visalia Parkway is identified as an arterial transportation corridor in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. Construct the northerly half to provide one lane of travel in each direction within current right of way. Improves mobility and connectivity of the southern shopping district and neighborhoods in the south east community of the City.

Future CIP, Visalia Parkway & Santa Fe Intersection, will connect Visalia Parkway from Court to Santa Fe, and
establish future alignment east towards Ben Maddox. Multi funded project total of $3.55m from $2.08m Transportation Impact (241) and $1.459m State Transportation (281-LTF).

Casey Chu
CP0519
(3010) $ D11 631,400 1,458,200
5 Riggin Widening from Mooney to Conyer: The project would include curb & gutter, pavement, medians, street lights, and other infrastructure such as fire hydrants and drainage inlets. This project will also construct a frontage road along this stretch to protect the Riggin facing residents. Utility relocation would also be needed. Construction of this
segment will help to complete the 4 lane arterial from Hwy 63 to Hwy 99 on Riggin Ave; providing a major East-West corridor along the North side of Visalia.

Diego Corvera CP0473 $ B20 454,000
6 Traffic Signal Modifications at Lovers Lane and Walnut Ave:

To accommodate four lanes of travel east and west along Walnut Ave and mitigate traffic impacts generated from the residential subdivision at the south east corner.

Subdivision completed the full widening of Walnut Ave
between Lovers Lane and McAulif St. Requires installation of additional signal poles and heads to accommodate
additional lanes and Video detection typical for all new traffic signals. Also includes right-of-way acquistion which is being funded by CP9130. The City is responsible for traffic signal modifications. Multi-funded project total of $755k from $605k Transportation Impact (241) and $150K
Measure R Local (131).

Diego Corvera
CP0521
(3010) $ D7 160,000 445,000
7 Houston-Santa Fe Roundabout Landscaping: Design and
install irrigation and landscaping within the Houston-Santa Fe roundabout. Design will include maintenance access. To visually improve the aesthetics of the surrounding
community to promote economic growth. Frank Senteno CP0307 $ B21 157,600 2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
Transportation Impact F ees - 241 (2520) - Continued
247

59 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
8 Linwood Street Embankment: Design and construction for the embankment of the future extension of Linwood Street north of Riggin Avenue. The embankment will be
approximately located within and along the westerly portion of the current Modoc Basin footprint. Establishment and rough grading of the Linwood Street alignment north of
Riggin Avenue is needed in order to accommodate access
to the Tier II Urban Development Boundary north of the
Modoc Basin. This project will build up the embankments and rough grade in preparation for the future extension of Linwood Street with preliminary engineering and design in FY 22/23 and construction in FY 23/24.

Cody
McLaughlin CP0568 - - A7 113,000 254,500
9 TIF Adminstration: This CIP funds staff time used to update the circulation element and to implement the transportation impact fee program. The supplies used by staff are
budgeted under a separate City CIP.This CIP also funds of public assets constructed in the public right of way. The continued and ongoing maintenance of the improvements
completed under this CIP is maintained by a separate City CIP.

Paul Bernal CP9633 - - N/A 100,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 100,000 10 East Side Regional Park EIR: Design and environmental work consisting of park master planning, preliminary
engineering for recharge facilities and project level EIR. The completed design and environmental work will put the
project in a good position to seek grant funding
opportunities with a well planned package. The additional appropriation is needed to add a noise study and to expand the traffic impact study to meet Caltrans' requirements for impacts to SR-198 and SR-216. Multi funded Project total of $100k is funded from $75k Park Impact Fee (211), $21k
Groundwater Recharge (224), $2k Transportation Impact
(241) and $2k Waterways (261), all of which includes prior year funding.

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0123
(3010) - - N/A 2,000
11 Design Tower St (Rd 148) from Walnut Ave to Visalia
Parkway (1.6 miles): Analyze options for a 4-lane, north- south arterial along Road 148 alignment. FY23/24 includes rough topo survey, geometric alignments, permitting
requirements, right of way needs, estimates, project
phasing. FY 25/26-27/28, includes Walnut to RR at K-Road Alignment (Rector Station) - CEQA, Design, RW, Permitting.

Future Construction cost estimated to be $5.9M. K Road to Caldwell & Caldwell to Visalia Parkway are located in Tier 2 & 3 of the Gen Plan and will be deferred to future years. Multi- funded project total of $1.1m from $567k Measure R Local (131) and $567k Transportation Impact (241).

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0526
(3010) - - D9 92,000 475,300
Transportation Impact F ees - 241 (2520) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
248

60 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
12 Design and Construct Tower St (Rd 148) from Cypress Ave to Walnut Ave (4200 feet): Analyze options for a 4-lane, north- south arterial along Rd 148 alignment, coordinating with future SR 198 interchange, SCE towers, Greenway Trail,
Creeks, and other structures. FY23/24 includes rough topo survey, geometric alignments, permitting requirements,
Caltrans coordination, right of way needs, estimates. FY 25/26-26/27 includes Tulare to Walnut - CEQA, Design, RW, Permitting; FY 27/28 Construction Ph 1 [Tulare to Walnut, (2500 feet)] approx. $4.5M. Due to continuing development in east Visalia, around State Route 198, another north/south arterial is needed. Multi funded project total of $5.4m from $2.7m Measure R Local (131) and $2.7m Transportation
Impact (241).

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0528
(3010) $ D10 79,300 420,400 2,217,000
13 Shirk St. & Walnut Ave Roadway Improvements: Complete roadway improvements along south side of Walnut Avenue
for 700± feet east of Shirk Street and Shirk Street for 1,400± feet south of Walnut Ave in conjunction with Shirk St and Walnut Ave traffic signal project (CP0045). Restripe Walnut Ave from Teddy St to Shirk St. Widen north side of Walnut Ave for 350± feet east of Roeben Ave removing west bound travel lane restriction to improve traffic flow. Includes traffic signal interconnect conduit within Walnut between Akers and Shirk. Improvements associated with the Valley Oaks Subdivision. Project total of $2.8 m from $2.02m from TIF (241), including prior year funding and $780k for Measure R Local (131).

Eric Bons
CP0196
(3010) $ C12 1,820,000
14 Visalia Parkway & Santa Fe Intersection (Design): Includes design, environmental, and right of way acquisition for the proposed roadway intersection. Design will include
roadway and intersection improvements, railroad crossing, culvert construction, and incorporate the existing Santa Fe Bike Trail and the roadway segment of Visalia Parkway
between Court and the intersection. Project design and environmental studies in FY 23/24 with Right-of-Way
acquisition following in FY 24/25. Construction in seperate CIP deferred pending available funding. Project will further transportation connectivity through the ongoing development of the arterial ring road concept that includes Visalia Parkway, Tower, Riggin, and Shirk by connecting Visalia Parkway to Santa Fe Street.

Casey Chu CP0569 $ D12 855,000 297,500
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
Transportation Impact F ees - 241 (2520) - Continued
249

61 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
15 NW Quadrant At-Grade Railroad Crossing: Study to
determine location for new at-grade crossing (possibly
Linwood St, Chinowth St, or Preston/Roeben St) &
abandonment of existing crossing. Installation of new
pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, traffic signal, railroad warning devices, signage and striping at recommended
location. Upgrade railroad tracks. Includes public outreach, abandonment of existing RR crossing and moderate
updates to two adjacent intersections north & south of new crossing. Need for a new crossing with the increased
development in NW quadrant and the limited at-grade
railroad crossings. FY23/24 Preliminary Engineering &
Environmental. FY24/25 & FY25/26 PS&E, Right of Way and Permitting. FY26/27 & FY27/28 Construction. Multi funded project total of $4.8m from $2.4m Measure R Local (131) and $2.4m Transportation Impact Fees (241).

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0524
(3010) - - A8 486,800 1,938,300
16 Tower Street-Mineral King to St. John's Parkway (Prelim Design): Preliminary design for construction of
approximately 6,400 ft of Tower Street from Mineral King to St. John's Parkway, excluding the new Interchange to SR 198 for access to park/basins. Will be a 4-lane, north-south arterial along the Rd 148 alignment, in coordination with future interchange at SR 198 and SR216 (Houston Ave); the SCE towers; and the Greenway Trail. Includes construction of new culvert crossing Mill Creek (Army Corp Permit).

Development in east Visalia, around SR 198, requires
another north/south arterial. No construction funds in this project. Multi funded project total of $194k from $96k
Transportation Impact (241) and $97k Parks & Rec (211).

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0525
(3010) - - B8 96,700
17 Santa Fe Street - Houston to Riggin (DESIGN): Project will develop plans, specs and estimate for construction of a 4- lane, north-south, arterial along the old Santa Fe Railroad alignment where City owns ROW and tracks have been
removed. Project also includes environmental review (CEQA and NEPA), public outreach and construction easement
acquisition. By preparing design plans for construction of the future street segment, the street project will be "shovel- ready" and will allow the City to pursue more grant funding opportunities for construction of the street. CP0308 Santa Fe Environmental Cleanup needs to be completed before
staff can proceed with design of the road extension.

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget NEW - - B18 1,203,000 485,000
Transportation Impact F ees - 241 (2520) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
250

62 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
18 Northside Scenic Corridor - Hillsdale Park/Storm Basin:

Develop Northside Highway 198 Open Space Setback Area
(east of Shirk) to serve as passive open space and naturally shaped drainage basin for existing and planned
development north of Highway 198 and both east and west of Shirk Street. Basin could receive water from Mill Creek for storm layoff and recharge purposes. Development of this is the first section of setback will include planning for other setback areas to the south and the west. (Multi Funded:

Total of $6.33m, including prior year funding, from $2.65m Storm Sewer (221), $1.77m Parks & Recreation (211), $1m Transportation Impact (241), and $900k Waterways Capital (261).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
CP9719
(3010) $$ A3 319,000 690,000
19 American Street Extension Goshen to Riggin: Includes curb & gutter, sidewalks, curb ramps and extension of street.

Project requires award of an EDA grant or cost sharing with the County to move forward. FY 24/25 (Staff submit grant application), FY 25/26 (Design and ROW), FY 26/27 - FY
27/28 (Construction). Improves mobility of traffic for the industrial park and the surrounding businesses while
reducing congestion and increase the level of service for the roadway. Multi funded project total of $7.4m from $1.2m Transportation Impact (241) and $6.2m EDA grant (281).

Project will not move forward without grant funding.

Chantha Chap
NEW
(3010) $$ A12 50,000 1,140,000
20 Riggin Widening Shirk to Akers: Includes curb and gutter, pavement, medians, street lights, and other infrastructure such as fire hydrants, drainage inlets and utility relocation.

This segment, along with other CIP's to widen Riggin will help to complete the 4-lane arterial from Hwy 63 to Hwy 99 on Riggin Ave, providing a major East-West corridor along the North side of Visalia. Multi-funded project total of $10.5m from $1.6m Measure R Regional (133) and $8.9m
Transportation Impact (241).

Diego Corvera
NEW
(3010) $ A10 8,945,000
21 Visalia Parkway & Santa Fe Intersection (Construction):

This project will construct a new roadway intersection at Visalia Parkway & Santa Fe Street. The work will entail roadway and intersection improvements, railroad crossing, culvert construction, and incorporate the existing Santa Fe Bike Trail into the intersection. Construction will also include the roadway segment of Visalia Parkway between Court Street and the intersection. This project will further transportation connectivity through the ongoing development of the arterial ring road concept that includes Visalia Parkway, Tower, Riggin, and Shirk by connecting Visalia Parkway to Santa Fe Street.

Casey Chu NEW $ D12 2,682,500 5,652,100
Transportation Impact F ees - 241 (2520) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
251

63 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
22 Tulare Avenue Extension to Tower Road: Construct Tulare Avenue from Arroyo Street to Road 148 (Tower Road) and
extend Tower Road from Tulare Avenue to just north of
Harvard. The section of Tulare Avenue from Lovers Lane to McAuliff was completed in 2018. Improve traffic circulation.

This project was intended to be constructed with the "NEW" project to extend Tulare Ave from Lovers Lane to McAuliff and will provide additional access and help alleviate
congestion on Walnut Avenue and McAuliff. Additional
subdivision development in this area will benefit greatly from this additional N/S access to Walnut Avenue.

Mike Porter NEW $ D13 1,232,700
23 Ben Maddox Widening: Widen Ben Maddox from Center
Avenue to Goshen Avenue. Project includes widening Ben
Maddox to full 110 foot, 4 lane divided arterial.

Improvements include paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA ramps, street lights, landscaping and irrigation conduit.

Project requires coordination with utilities to relocate poles, property owners to relocate and install drive approaches, and acquire ROW. Note: UUD $1.3M not included. Improves traffic circulation and pedestrian accessibility. Widening will also have a positive impact on development for the Civic Center and commercial parcels within the area.

Mike Porter NEW $ B19 850,000 248,400 2,009,900
24 Goshen Widening Ben Maddox to Burke: Widen to full 84 foot 2-lane collector. Includes paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA ramps, street lights, bike lanes, landscaping and
irrigation conduit. Requires coordination with utilities to relocate poles, property owners to relocate and install drive approaches, and acquire ROW. Improves traffic circulation and pedestrian accessibility. Will positively impact
development for Civic Center and commercial parcels within the area. Multi funded project total of $2.35m from $1.0m Measure R Local (131) and $1.35m Transportation Impact
(241).

Mike Porter
NEW
(3010) $ B17 500,000 850,000
25 Construct Santa Fe Street Houston to Riggin: Construct 4- lane, north-south, arterial along the old Santa Fe Railroad where City owns right of way, and tracks have been
removed. Includes, grading, new structural section, curb and gutter, storm drain system, median, street lighting, striping, landscaping, and block wall installation. Also included is single box culvert (100' long) over Modoc Ditch, upgrading signal at Riggin intersection, signalized
pedestrian crosswalk at Modoc Ditch Trail crossing, and interconnect conduit for the entire length of project. Staff to pursue grant funding opportunities and project will not move forward without an award of grant funds.

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget NEW $$ B18 11,033,700
Transportation Impact F ees - 241 (2520) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
252

64 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
26 Southside Scenic Corridor: Develop basin on south side of SR-198, east of Shirk St as linear, landscaped basin with functional passive open space to receive City storm water flows from Mill Creek through either Persian-Watson Ditch or a pipeline to the north under SR-198. Phase 1,
implement with Sierra Village development expansion to
relocate existing City basin. Requires acquisition of 20 acres to the east of Phase 1 improvements. Included in the west side storm water lay-off plan. Multi funded project total of $4.3m from $1.4m Parks & Rec (211) , $2.2m Storm
Sewer Construction (221), and $580k Transportation Impact (241).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
NEW
(3010) $ C8 580,000
6,979,200 5,239,300 5,333,400 17,635,200 11,165,800 15,673,600 Notes: Multi-funded means this is only this fund's portion of the total amount budgeted. These projects are funded from multiple sources and the full budget is shown in the "Multi-Fund 301".

The Budget Impact column shows the estimated annual impact of the project on the operating budget for maintenance once completed or purchased. - - No Annual Maintenance Costs (or no increase over existing cost) $$$ Annual Maintenance costs is over $25,000. These projects will be explained in detail in the project description. $ Annual Maintenance cost is $5,000 or less $$$$ Project will result in savings as described in project description $$ Annual Maintenance costs is $5,000 to $25,000
Transportation Impact F ees - 241 (2520) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
253

65 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Beginning Cash Balance 2,111,700 1,670,500 1,619,900 (976,100) (2,906,500) (2,944,300) Waterways Impact F ee 464,200 473,500 483,000 492,700 502,600 512,700 Interest Earnings and Miscellaneous Revenues 30,400 30,400 (9,700) (28,800) (29,200) (30,500) Operating Expenditures (8,500) (8,500) (8,700) (8,900) (9,100) (9,300) Capital Improvements (927,300) (546,000) (3,060,600) (2,385,400) (502,100) (612,400) Total Resources Available for F uture Projects 1,670,500 1,619,900 (976,100) (2,906,500) (2,944,300) (3,083,800) # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
1 Acquire and Restore Riparian Area Right of Way (ROW):

Work with developers to purchase Right-of-Way along
waterways as part of development to preserve and restore native riparian vegetation.

Wyndi
Ferguson CP0427 - - N/A 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2 Basin E & Mill Creek Realignment (Design): FY22/23-23/24 Design of Basin E & Realignment of Mill Creek. Basin will provide a 12 acre basin for recharge purposes. The
realignment of approximately 15 acres of Mill Creek will provide passive, riparian open space that can be enjoyed by the public and will provide an inviting habitat for native species. Design will include storm water components such large diameter pipe, structures, and trails. A separate CIP request for construction is proposed for FY 24/25 which will be deferred. pending available funds. Multi-funded project total of $841k funded from $286k Recreation Facilities
(211), $84k Groundwater Recharge (224), and $471k
Waterway Construction (261).

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0518
(3010) - - B12 425,300 46,000
3 East Side Regional Park EIR: Design and environmental work consisting of park master planning, preliminary
engineering for recharge facilities and project level EIR. The completed design and environmental work will put the
project in a good position to seek grant funding
opportunities with a well planned package. The additional appropriation is needed to add a noise study and to expand the traffic impact study to meet Caltrans' requirements for impacts to SR-198 and SR-216. Multi funded Project total of $100k is funded from $75k Park Impact Fee (211), $21k
Groundwater Recharge (224), $2k Transportation Impact
(241) and $2k Waterways (261), all of which includes prior year funding.

Rebecca
Keenan
CP0123
(3010) - - N/A 2,000
Waterway Construction - 261 (2540)
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
This fund is derived from developer impact fees. Funds are restricted for acquisition of development setbacks along waterways designated in the Visalia General Plan and restoration of riparian vegetation.

Cash Balance Summary
254

66 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
4 Basin E & Mill Creek Realignment (Construction): For
construction of Basin E & Mill Creek Realignment. Basin will provide a 12 acre basin for rehcarge purposes. The
realignment of approximately 15 acres of Mill Creek will provide passive, riparian open space that can be enjoyed by the public and will provide an inviting habitat for native species. Project will include storm water components such large diameter pipe, structures, and trails. Multi-funded project total of $4.69m from $1.59m Recreation Facilities (211), $469k Ground Water Recharge (224), and $2.63m
Waterway Construction (261). Annual maintenance cost for this basin is estimated to be $35k per year.

Rebecca
Keenan
NEW
(3010) $$$ B12 2,560,600 66,000
5 Northside Scenic Corridor - Hillsdale Park/Storm Basin:

Develop Northside Highway 198 Open Space Setback Area
(east of Shirk) to serve as passive open space and naturally shaped drainage basin for existing and planned
development north of Highway 198 and both east and west of Shirk Street. Basin could receive water from Mill Creek for storm layoff and recharge purposes. Development of this is the first section of setback will include planning for other setback areas to the south and the west. (Multi Funded:

Total of $6.33m, including prior year funding, from $2.65m Storm Sewer (221), $1.77m Parks & Recreation (211), $1m Transportation Impact (241), and $900k Waterways Capital (261).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
CP9719
(3010) $$ A3 900,000
6 Northside Scenic Corridor West of Shirk: Northside Highway 198 Open Space Setback Area (west of Shirk) - Acquisition of approximately 30.1 acres land from three existing parcels needed for the northwest scenic setback area and riparian setback from Mill Creek to continue development of the corridor as passive recreational open space and drainage basin. The basin is planned to serve existing and planned development north of Highway 198 between Clancy and
Shirk. Acquisition of land for the northwest portion of the scenic corridor (between Clancy and Shirk) to start in 25/26 starting at Clancy and heading east, acquiring from one parcel per year. Multi funded project total of $3.07m from $868k Parks & Rec (211), $1.3m Storm Sewer Construction (221), and $900k Waterways Capital (261).

Katherine
Woodhull -
Fuget
NEW
(3010) $$ A4 900,000
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
Waterway Construction - 261 (2540) - Continued
255

67 # Project Description (100 word limit)
Project
Manager
Project #
(or "new")
Budget
Impact
Map
Ref 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
7 Basins A, B, and C East Side Regional Park: For Design & Construction to provide approximately 30-acres of
groundwater recharge. Includes demolition of existing
orchards, earthwork, piping structures, recharge system, trails, landscaping. Provides passive, riparian open space.

Phased as: FY25/26-26/27 Design Basins A, B, & C;
FY27/28 Construction Basins A, B, & C. Completion of this CIP and separate CIP Basin E + Mill Creek realignment will result in an increase of 42-acres of groundwater recharge.

Multi-funded project total of $6.7m from $3.2m Recreation Facilities (211, $3.35m Groundwater Recharge (224), and $134k Waterway Construction (261). Annual maintenance
cost for this basin is estimated to be $35k per year.

Rebecca
Keenan
NEW
(3010) $$$ B12 19,400 2,100 112,400
927,300 546,000 3,060,600 2,385,400 502,100 612,400
Notes: Multi-funded means this is only this fund's portion of the total amount budgeted. These projects are funded from multiple sources and the full budget is shown in the "Multi-Fund 301".

The Budget Impact column shows the estimated annual impact of the project on the operating budget for maintenance once completed or purchased. - - No Annual Maintenance Costs (or no increase over existing cost) $$$ Annual Maintenance costs is over $25,000. These projects will be explained in detail in the project description. $ Annual Maintenance cost is $5,000 or less $$$$ Project will result in savings as described in project description $$ Annual Maintenance costs is $5,000 to $25,000
Waterway Construction - 261 (2540) - Continued
2022/23 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Program
256
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0413 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 11.

Agenda Item Wording:

Request to Authorize the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Ave 288 Reconstruction & WWTP Onsite Improvements Project. (Project Number 4330-72000/CP0314-999 & 3010- 72000/CP0319-999)
Deadline for Action: None
Submitting Department: Administration -CIP Engineering
Contact Name and Phone Number:

Diego Corvera, Civil Engineer, [email protected], (559) 713-4209 Frank Senteno, City Engineer, [email protected], (559) 713-4331 Nick Mascia, Assistant City Manager, [email protected], (559) 713-4323 Department Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to file a Notice of Completion for the for the Ave 288 Reconstruction & WWTP Onsite Improvements Project.

Background Discussion:

This project reconstructed Avenue 288 between Road 68 to Visalia Wastewater Conservation (treatment) Plant (WWTP) which is currently named as Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). As well as paved various areas onsite in the WRF as identified by staff to improve plant circulation and allow for more storage space.

The construction work consisted of demolition, roadway grading, road excavation, concrete work, and paving operations.

The WRF has been expanded to increase its capacities in recent years and as such, a corresponding increase in the wear and tear of Avenue 288. To ensure the efficient functionality of the WRF, Avenue 288 needed to be reconstructed as the roadway was in disrepair and past its useful life span. The typical life span of a paved roadway is between 20 and 25 years with annual maintenance.

Avenue 288 is within the County of Tulare’sjurisdiction and since it’sthe only access road to the WRF it is in the interest of the City of Visalia to control the maintenance and operations of this segment of Avenue 288. As such a Maintenance and Operations Agreement was executed in 2020 to give the City of Visalia authority to maintain the roadway including, but not limited to, roadway surface, drainage, traffic signing/striping and encroachment permitting responsibilities. As part of this agreement the County of Tulare agreed to contribute $200K towards the roadway rehabilitation as it is a County road that offer benefits to a few county residents. But it was understood and agreed that most of the wear and tear on the roadway stems from the WRF operations. As such the City of Visalia paid for the majority of the roadway construction cost with the County covering approximately 25% of the original roadway construction estimate. Per the same agreement, the City will request Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 5
powered by Legistar™
257
File #: 22-0413 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 11.
25% of the original roadway construction estimate. Per the same agreement, the City will request reimbursement of the County’s contribution following the filing of the Notice of Completion.

The reconstruction of this roadway consisted of the pulverization of the existing asphalt followed by subgrade preparation and included he installation of a Stabilized Geo Grid as a cost saving measure designed to reduce the roadway section thickness.

The construction work for the onsite improvements of the WRF consisted of subgrade preparation, structural pavement section construction, curb & gutter installation, and storm drain modifications.

The start of construction began on November 1st, 2021 and was completed in March 2022.

The final total construction cost was $934,301.90 for reconstruction of Avenue 288 and $271,314.00 for the WRF Onsite Improvements for a total of $1,205,615.90. The construction contract was awarded to Cal Valley Construction Inc. in the amount of $706,285.00 for Avenue 288 Reconstruction and $271,314.00 for the WWTP onsite Improvements in June of 2021 for a total contract amount of $977,599. The final cost of the construction contract was $1,205,615.90 that included total change order amount of $228,016.90.

A request to approve the construction change order was previously presented to City Council at the June 6, 2022 City Council meeting. The change order was for a not-to-exceed amount of $300,000 to primarily repair the “pumping”of the soils once the roadway had been excavated prior to paving Avenue 288. As shown in the table below, the final amount of that change order was reduced to $219,575.53:

The following is a breakdown of the construction change orders:

Change Order Breakdown - Avenue 288 Reconstruction CP0319 No Change orders for WWTP Onsite Improvements CP0314
Category Cost Percentage
Errors & Omissions (E&O)$0 0%
Utility Conflict (UT) $0 0%
Balance of Quantities (BQ)($2,475.00) -0.35%
Unforeseen (UN) $219,575.53 31.09%
Change of Scope (CofS)$10,916.37 1.54%
Total: $228,016.90 32.28%
Balance of Quantities
The cost associated with Balance of Quantities category consisted of the omission of the installation of redwood header boards against the paved roadway. It was determined that the redwood headers were unnecessary. All reduction of material was paid at the unit price cost, resulting in credit to the project.

Unforeseen
The cost associated with Unforeseen category consisted of encountering roadway “pumping” following the subgrade compaction work.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 5
powered by Legistar™
258
File #: 22-0413 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 11.

Pumping can be observed as heavy loads are applied to roadway; the road surface creates waves similar in appearance to waves in the ocean. The wave like movement of the roadway is the result of the underlying subgrade soils being oversaturated with moisture. Left unaddressed, the pumping will potentially undermine the new asphalt pavement and result in an expedited deterioration or outright failure of the roadway.

The cost and effort associated with correcting the “pumping”was performed on a time and material basis and the scope was expansive as pumping was observed in over 18 locations along Avenue 288. The remedy to correct the pumping involved excavation of each pumping location, placement of two layers of geo grid textile and compaction of virgin aggregate base to stabilize the soil and resolve the pumping issue. (Refer to attached Staff Report at the regular Council meeting on June 6, 2022 for more detailed explanation of the change order).

Change of Scope
The cost associated with the change of scope category consisted of the replacement of the Avenue 288 structural section of 3” asphalt over 7.5” pulverized asphalt mixed with aggregate base and Tensar geo grid with 3” asphalt over 9” of cement sand slurry over an existing culvert along the roadway. This change was made to protect the culvert by avoiding vibratory compaction operations on the 60-year culvert in turn minimize any potential damage during construction.

There was a total of two (2) contract change orders associated with this project. Each of the change orders were reviewed and approved by the City of Visalia Change Order Committee. The Committee is an informal committee that reviews the contract change order request for completeness, accuracy, constructability, objectivity, consistency, and overall insight. After reviewing the request and discussing the item, the committee recommended approval of the amendment of the contract to Cal Valley Construction.

Fiscal Impact:

The Avenue 288 and WRF construction project was budgeted, using WWTP fund (431) and a contribution by the County of Tulare (281).

The project budget is as follows:

Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project CP0319
Funding Source
WWTP (431) $977,766.00
County of Tulare Contribution (281) $200,000.00
Total Project Funding $1,177,766.00
Project Costs
Design Costs $43,100.00
Construction Contract $706,285.00
Construction Change Orders $228,016.90
Construction Services (CM, inspection, materials testing and Survey)$121,000.00 Total Project Costs $1,098,401.90
Summary
Total Funding $1,177,766.00
Total Cost Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project $1,098,401.90 Total Funding to be returned to funding source 431$79,364.10 Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 5
powered by Legistar™
259
File #: 22-0413 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 11.

Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project CP0319
Funding Source
WWTP (431) $977,766.00
County of Tulare Contribution (281) $200,000.00
Total Project Funding $1,177,766.00
Project Costs
Design Costs $43,100.00
Construction Contract $706,285.00
Construction Change Orders $228,016.90
Construction Services (CM, inspection, materials testing and Survey)$121,000.00 Total Project Costs $1,098,401.90
Summary
Total Funding $1,177,766.00
Total Cost Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project $1,098,401.90 Total Funding to be returned to funding source 431$79,364.10 WRF Onsite Improvements Project CP0314
Funding Source
WWTP (431) $339,525.00
Total Project Funding $339,525.00
Project Costs
Design Costs $19,605.00
Construction Contract $271,314.00
Construction Change Orders $0
Construction Services (CM, inspection, materials testing and Survey)$41,055.00 Total Project Costs $331,974.00
Summary
Total Funding $339,525.00
Total WWTP Onsite Improvements Project $331,974.00
Total Funding to be returned to funding source 431$7,551.00 Prior Council Action:

June 6, 2022
Confirmed the City Managers execution of a construction contract change order to excavate and repair various roadway subgrade sections along Avenue 288 due to subgrade “pumping”on a time and materials basis with a not to exceed amount of $300,000 for the Avenue 288 Reconstruction project (4330-72000/CP0319-999) and appropriated $300,000 from the WWTP Fund (431).

June 7, 2021
Authorized the City Manager to award the construction contract for RFB 20-21-23, Avenue 288 Reconstruction & WWTP Onsite Improvements Project to Cal Valley Construction.

Alternatives:

None Recommended
Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to authorize the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Ave 288 Reconstruction & WRF Onsite Improvements Project.

Environmental Assessment Status:

CEQA Review:

Categorical Exemption, Section 15301c, issued November 18th, 2020 for the Avenue 288 Reconstruction and WWTP onsite improvements.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 4 of 5
powered by Legistar™
260
File #: 22-0413 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 11.

Attachments:

1. Contractor Disclosure Form

2. Vicinity Map

3. June 6, 2022 - Change Order Staff Report
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 5 of 5
powered by Legistar™
261
262
Hwy 99
Hwy 198
N Plaza Dr
S Plaza Dr
W Hurley Ave
N Neeley St
S Plaza Dr
.

Ave 288 Reconstruction &
WWTP On Site Improvements
WWTP On-Site
Improvements
Legend

VICINITY MAP
Ave 288 Reconstruction
Avenue 288
Visalia
WRF
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
Silty SandSoil with Clay BinderExisting Undisturbed Road AsphaltAvenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

0. Existing Conditions
289
Silty SandSoil with Clay BinderExisting Undisturbed Road Pulverized Asphalt (New Base Layer)Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

1. Pulverize Existing Asphalt to reuse as Base Layer
290
Base LayerGeogridSubgradeSilty SandSoil with Clay BinderCurrent Roadway SectionExisting Undisturbed Soil Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

2. Prepare Subgrade & Place Geogrid
291
Base LayerGeogridSubgradeSilty SandSoil with Clay BinderRoadway SectionExisting Undisturbed Soil Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

3. Place Asphalt
Asphalt
292
Base LayerGeogridSubgradeSilty SandSoil with Clay BinderCurrent Roadway SectionExisting Undisturbed Soil Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

2.1 Pumping Roadway Encountered
293
294
Base LayerGeogridSubgradeSilty SandSoil with Clay BinderCurrent Roadway SectionExisting Undisturbed Soil Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

2.2 Causes of Pumping – Heavy Loading & Saturated SoilWheel Loading Saturated SoilRising Water
295
Base LayerGeogridSubgradeSilty SandSoil with Clay BinderCurrent Roadway SectionExisting Undisturbed Soil Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

2.3 Causes of Pumping – Clay Binder
Water held by Clay Binder
296
Base LayerGeogridSilty SandSoil with Clay BinderCurrent Roadway SectionExisting Undisturbed Soil Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

2.5 Change Order Repairs – Digout Wet Materials & “Bridge” Over Saturated Soil Base LayerGeogrid
297
Base LayerGeogridSilty SandSoil with Clay BinderCurrent Roadway SectionExisting Undisturbed Soil Avenue 288 Reconstruction Project – Construction Sequence Not to Scale

3. Place Asphalt
Base LayerGeogrid
Asphalt
298
Before – No Setback
299
After – Setback in Progress
300
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0423 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 12.

Agenda Item Wording:

Review and approval of the Citizens Advisory Committee’s recommendations for the 2023 Youth Non -Profit Grant Awards.

Deadline for Action: 12/3/2022
Submitting Department: Finance and Technology Services
Contact Name and Phone Number:

Juan Lopez, CAC Non-Profit Grant Subcommittee Chair, 559-679-9925; Ruth Pena, Financial Analyst, 559-713-4327, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Department Recommendation:

That the City Council approve the Citizen Advisory Committee’s (CAC) recommendation to award a distribution of $65,000 among 12 non-profit organizations for the 2023 calendar year.

Background Discussion:

The CAC received 14 applications from qualified non-profit organizations for grant amounts ranging from $2,500 to $6,500 for a total of $82,490. The CAC recommends awarding 12 grants ranging from $2,000 to $6,500 for the total of $65,000.

On June 20, 2022, the City Council authorized the allocation of $65,000 in non-profit grants from the fiscal year 2022-23 budget. No significant changes were made to this year’s application process and format. The deadline for proposals to be submitted via email or in person was October 5, 2022. The grant period begins January 1, 2023. As in previous years, grants were solicited by mailing notices to all agencies that expressed an interest in the past. The grant announcement was also posted on the city’s Facebook page and advertised via the City’s website and newsletter.

The CAC established a Non-Profit Grant Subcommittee of five regular CAC committee members to review and recommend grant awards. The Subcommittee conducted two workshops on September 7 and 8, 2021, to explain the application process to interested applicants. The CAC received and reviewed 14 grant applications from 14 different agencies. The total amount of grant funds requested was $87,000. Two of the 14 applications were not recommended for funding.

The CAC Subcommittee reviewed the applications and came to a consensus recommendation to award 12 grants between $2,500 and $6,500 for a total of $65,000. Four grants are recommended at less than their requested amount, so as not to exceed the maximum grant amount, or the total $65,000 allocation. The recommendation was presented to and reviewed by the full CAC committee at its November 2, 2022, meeting. At that time, the CAC unanimously adopted the subcommittee’s recommendation.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
301
File #: 22-0423 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 12.

Table 1 compares grant application statistics from the last two cycles with the current cycle:

Table 1: Grant Year Comparisons 2021 2022 2023
Number of grant applications received 12 14 14
Number of agencies submitting applications 12 14 14
Number of grant applications reviewed 12 14 14
Number of reviewed applications not recommended for funding2 2 2 Number of grants awarded 10 12 12
Number of agencies awarded grants 10 12 12
Total amount requested $63,500 $82,490 $87,000
Total amount awarded $65,000 $65,000 $65,000
Highest grant awarded $6,500 $6,500 $6,500
Lowest grant awarded $6,500 $2,000 $2,500
Average grant requested $5,292 $5,892 $6,214
Average grant awarded $6,500 $5,417 $5,417
The subcommittee members read and rated each application based on how well the proposed outcomes, actions, and measures were interconnected, and also how well it met the requirements of the grant’s stated purpose as described below. The scoring system is based on a 100-point rubric with each section of the application scored based on how well it addressed the question. The two applicants not recommended for funding were ranked at a lower level based upon the factors discussed above. Subcommittee members funded applications based on their ranking level until the $65,000 was reached.

The recommended projects meet the purpose of the grant program to improve the quality of life for the youth of Visalia through a variety of strategies: basic essentials such as shoes, laptops for elementary students, computer skills, drone building, mental health services, special needs youth fitness program, cultural and arts education, training for teen parents, substance abuse counseling, preparation for college, and other youth services. These projects serve a diverse population and age range, including students K-12, children with disabilities, gang involved, and at- risk children.

Table 2 lists the Non-Profit funding recommendations and program descriptions.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
302
File #: 22-0423 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 12.

Table 2: Non-Profit Grant Recommendations and Program Descriptions for 2023 Program Year Program Description
Requested
($)
Recommended
($)
New
Program?

1. American GI Forum – Visalia
Chapter Northside Boxing Club 6,500$ 6,500$ no

2. Arts Visalia Youth Art Program-scholarships 6,500 6,500 no

3. Bethlehem Center Shoes for at least 150 children 6,500 6,500 no

4. CASA of Tulare Co. Environmental Education 6,500 5,500 no

5. Changing Minds Foundation Drone Building and Computer Skills 6,500 6,500 yes

6. Cultural Heritage Foundation Youth Led Projects 6,500 5,500 no

7. Happy Trails Riding Academy
Therapeutic Riding for Children with
Disabilities-scholarships 2,500 2,500 no

8. ImagineU Children’s Museum Quarterly Free Night at the Museum 6,500 6,500 no

9. Neighborhood Church
Laptops for Houston students in the
Neighborhood Degree Program 6,500 6,000 no

10. Solution Inc. Mental Health Services VUSD kids 6,500 2,500 yes

11. The Adapted Athlete Adapted Athlete Youth Programs 6,500 6,500 yes

12. Visalia PAL 10 month Youth Leadership Program 6,500 4,000 no Recommended 74,000$ 65,000$
Applicants Not Recommended for Funding
Program Description
Requested
($)
Recommended
($)
New
Program?

13. League of Mexican American
Women Latina Youth Conference 6,500 - yes

14. Dolores Huerta Foundation Youth Inspired Community Mural 6,500 - yes Not Recommended 13,000$ -$
Total 87,000$ 65,000$
Agency
Agency
Fiscal Impact:
2022-23 General Fund appropriation of $65,000.

Prior Council Action: Adoption of FY 2022-23 Budget - June 20, 2022.

Other: Committee/Commission Review and Action - CAC Review and Adoption of Subcommittee Recommendations - November 2, 2022.

Alternatives: Redirect awards within the $65,000 amount allocated by the City Council.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to award the non-profit grants as recommended by the Citizens Advisory Committee as shown in Table 2.

Environmental Assessment Status: N/A
CEQA Review: N/A
Attachments: Non-Profit Grant Rating Sheet
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
303
File #: 22-0423 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 12.

Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
304
City of Visalia Non-Profit Proposal Rating Sheet
Applicant: New or Existing
Grantee:

Section Criteria Points
possible
Points
awarded Comments
Cover page,
Q 1-2
Responses are provided for all fields, certification is signed by individual authorized by the resolution, and questions 1 and 2 provide the requested information.
10 Q 3 Response provides a brief description of the specific intended use of the Visalia Non-Profit grant, including age and number of Visalia youth to be served.
10 Q 4 At least 1 outcome with planned activities and measurements of success. The outcome supports the grant’s goal: improve quality of life of youth living in or attending school within Visalia. 25 Q 5 Response provides the requested information. 5
Q 6 Response states the applicant’s mission or purpose. Their mission is aligned with the goal of this grant. 5
Q 7 Applicant has experience and success in providing youth services. 5 Q 8 Applicant states the specific population they intend to serve. 5 The general population of Visalia youth is acceptable.

Q 9 Applicant requests seed funding to start a new program or new activity. 10
Q 10 Applicant has had no financial/budgetary problems/debt in last 5 years that could jeopardize grant completion. 5
Program
Budget
Income & Expense tables are complete. Total request is between $1,000 - $6,500. Costs appear to be adequate for proposed activities. 10 All required
Attachments
are
provided:

1. For non-profits: 501(c)(3)

2. Board of Directors (names, titles, addresses, phone nos.)

3. Agency’s most recent year-end financial statement/audit

4. Resolution completed
10 Previous
Recipient?
Were the required reports received? Was the full allocation accounted for? If funds were not fully expended, did the agency communicate plans for spending out the funds?
up to
-20
Deduct points for previous applicants
that did not submit reports or did not
contact Ruth if they needed more time.

Total points 100

305
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0436 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 13.

Agenda Item Wording:

Second reading of Ordinance Nos. 2022-14 and 2022-15 for the 2022 Building and Fire Code adoption.

Deadline for Action: 12/31/2022
Submitting Department: Community Development
Contact Name and Phone Number:

Jason Huckleberry, Assistant Community Development Director, (559) 713-4495 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Val Garcia, Senior Plans Examiner, (559) 713-4426, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Corbin Reed, Fire Marshal, (559) 713-4272, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Paul Bernal, Community Development Director, (559) 713-4025, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Department Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 2022-15 to adopt the 2022 California Fire Code, and Ordinance No. 2022-14 to adopt the 2022 California Administrative Code, 2022 California Referenced Standard code, 2022 California Building Code, 2022 California Plumbing Code, 2022 California Mechanical Code, 2022 California Electric Code, 2022 California Historical Building Code, 2022 California Existing Building Code, 2022 California Residential Code, 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, and 2022 California Energy Code. The recommended action will initiate building code updates as recently mandated by the State of California.

Background Discussion:

Every three years, the State adopts new codes (known collectively as the California Building Standards Code) to establish uniform standards for the construction and maintenance of buildings, electrical systems, plumbing systems, mechanical systems, and fire and life safety systems. These codes have been updated for 2022, the prior update was in 2019, and the attached ordinances are being passed to update the references in the Visalia Municipal Code to the applicable statewide standards. On July 1, 2022 the State of California, Building Standards Commission published the 2022 California Fire Code (CFC), 2022 California Administrative Code, 2022 Referenced Standard Code, 2022 California Building Code (CBC), 2022 California Plumbing Code (CPC), 2022 California Mechanical Code (CMC), 2022 California Electric Code (CEC), 2022 California Historical Building Code, 2022 California Existing Building Code, 2022 California Residential Code (CRC), 2022 Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
306
File #: 22-0436 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 13.

California Green Building Standards Code (CAL Green), and 2022 California Energy Code.

Local jurisdictions are required by State law to implement these State of California mandated codes along with local amendments by January 1, 2023. In order to comply with State law, the Building Safety Division recommends adoption of the following Appendices as adopted by the State Building Standards Commission, California Department of Housing and Community Development and California State Fire Marshal:
· 2022 California Building Code appendix C: Group U - Agricultural Buildings, F: Rodent proofing, H: Signs, I: Patio Covers, J: Grading and P: Emergency Housing. · 2022 California Residential Code appendix AH: Patio Covers, AQ: Tiny Houses, AS; Strawbale Construction, AY: Areas Protected By The Facilities Of The Central Valley Flood Protection Plan, and AZ: Emergency Housing.
· 2022 California Mechanical Code appendix B: Procedures to be followed to Place Gas Equipment into operation, and C: Installation and testing of oil (liquid) fuel-fired equipment. · 2022 California Plumbing Code appendix A: Recommended Rules of Sizing the Water Supply system, B: Explanatory Notes on Combination Waste & Vent systems, D: Sizing Storm Water Drainage Systems, H: Private Sewage Disposal Systems, I: Installation Standards for PEX Tubing Systems for Hot- and Cold- Water Distribution, and J: Combination of Indoor and Outdoor Combustion and Ventilation Opening Design.
· 2022 California Electrical Code Annexes A and B.
· 2022 California Green Building Standards Code appendix A4: Residential Voluntary Measures, A5: Nonresidential Voluntary Measures.

Any code appendices not adopted by the State are not being adopted by the City of Visalia.

The City of Visalia Fire Chief and Fire Marshal recommend adopting the California Fire Code, Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9, 2022 Edition, together with the California Fire Code Standards referenced and the following Appendices:

Chapters 4: Special Detailed requirements Based on Use and Occupancy, B: Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings,
C: Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution,
D: Fire Apparatus Access Roads,
H: Hazardous Materials Management Plans and Hazardous Materials Inventory Statements, I: Fire Protection Systems - Noncompliant Conditions, O: Temporary Haunted Houses, Ghost Walks, and Similar Amusement Uses and hereby repeal and replace Section 8.20.010 through 8.20.120 of the Visalia Municipal Code.

Fiscal Impact:

Unknown
Prior Council Action:

The City Council held a public hearing and approved the first reading of Ordinances 202-14 and 2019 Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
307
File #: 22-0436 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #: 13.

The City Council held a public hearing and approved the first reading of Ordinances 202-14 and 2019 -15 at the November 21, 2022 Council meeting.

Other:

Reviewed and discussed with the Building Advisory Committee on November 16, 2022.

Alternatives:

Take no action - State building code would become effective without local amendments and adoption of appendices January 1, 2023 by operation of law.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 2022-14 and Ordinance No. 2022-15 for the 2022 California Building and Fire Code adoption process.

Environmental Assessment Status: N/A
CEQA Review: N/A
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 2022-14 Building Code

2. Ordinance 2022-15 Fire Code
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
308
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-14

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF VISALIA
TO REPEAL AND REPLACE CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.06, 15.08, 15.20, 15.24,

15.28, 15.36, 15.64, 15.68, 15.72, and 15.76

OF THE VISALIA MUNICIPAL CODE,

BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION ORDINANCE

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VISALIA;

Section 1. Consistent with its control over municipal affairs and the powers vested in the City of Visalia through the California Constitution and its Charter, the City of Visalia is authorized to secure and promote the public health, comfort, safety and welfare of its citizenry. The City Council of the City of Visalia finds that the revisions to Chapters 15.04, 15.06, 15.08, 15.20,

15.24, 15.28, 15.36, 15.64, 15.68, 15.72, and 15.76 of the Visalia Municipal Code as set forth below are necessary to promote the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Visalia. The existing Visalia Municipal Code Chapters 15.04, 15.06, 15.08, 15.20, 15.24,

15.28, 15.36, 15.64, 15.68, 15.72, and 15.76 are hereby repealed and replaced as follows below, it is noted that specific findings based on local climatic, topographical or geological conditions, pursuant to Health and Safety Code, sections 17958.7 and 18941.5, that support the adoption of the appendices and amendments described below are included in Section 2 of this Ordinance:

15.04.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Administra tive Code.

A. That certain administrative code, in book form know n and designated as the 2022 California Administrative Code, California Code Regulations Ti tle 24 Part 1, Published by International Code Council, is adopted as the technical Administr ative Code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, subparagraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set f orth herein, except for those deletions, modifications, and amendments set forth below. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

1. Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of the code adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply w ith any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder or any certificate or permit is sued thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken or who shall fail to comply with such order as affirmed or modified by the city attorney based on a recommendation of t he building official or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and non-compliance respectively be guilty of a misdemeanor, or infraction as determined by the city attorney.

2. Such violation shall be subject to penalties in accordance with Section 1.12.010.

15.06.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Referenced Standards Code.

A. That certain referenced code, in book form known an d designated as the 2022 California 309
Referenced Standards Code, is adopted as the technical Referenced Standards Code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, subparagraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein, except for those deletions, modifications, and amendments set forth below. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

1. Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of the code adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply w ith any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder or any certificate or permit is sued thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken or who shall fail to comply with such order as affirmed or modified by the city attorney based on a recommendation of t he building official or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and non-compliance respectively be guilty of a misdemeanor, or infraction as determined by the city attorney.

2. Such violation shall be subject to penalties in accordance with Section 1.12.010.

15.08.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Building C ode.

A. That certain building code, in book form known and designated as the 2022 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Volumes 1 and 2, and published by The International Code Council, is adopted as the Building Code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, subparagraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein, except for those deletions, modifications, and amendments set forth below. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

1. Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of the code adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply with any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder or any certificate or permit issued thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken or who shall fail to comply with such order as affirmed or modified by the city attorney based on a recommendation of the building official or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and non-compliance respectively be guilty of a misdemeanor, or infraction as determined by the city attorney.

2. Such violation shall be subject to penalties in accordance with Section 1.12.010.

B. Included specifically are 2022 California Building Code Appendices B (Board of Appeals), C (Group U – Agricultural Buildings), F (Rodent proofing), H (Signs), I (Patio Covers), J (Grading) and P (Emergency Housing).

C. Reference is made to three copies of the 2022 California Building Code, one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in th e office of Building Safety Division of the city, 310
which are now filed for full particulars of said Building Code.

15.20.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Plumbing Code.

A. That certain plumbing code, in book form known and designated as the 2022 California Plumbing Code, Title 24, Part 5 as Published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials prepared and published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, based on the 2021 Uniform Plu mbing Code adopted as the plumbing code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, subparagraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein, except for those deletions, modifications, and amen dments set forth below. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chap ter is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect th e validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

1. Any person who shall violate any of the provisio ns of the code adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply w ith any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder or any certificate or permit is sued thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken or who shall fail to comply with such order as affirmed or modified by the city attorney based on a recommendation of t he building official or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and non-compliance respectively be guilty of a misdemeanor, or infraction as determined by the city attorney.

2. Such violation shall be subject to penalties in accordance with Section 1.12.010.

B. Appeals Board section 1.8.8 shall be deleted. Refer to 2022 California Building Code Section

1.8.8 as amended.

C. Included specifically are 2022 California Plumbing Code Appendix A (Recommended Rules for Sizing the Water Supply System), B (Explanatory Notes on Combination Waste & Vent Systems), D (Sizing Storm Water Drainage Systems), H (Private Sewage Disposal Systems), I (Installation Standards for PEX Tubing Systems for Hot- and Cold-Water Distribution), and J (Combination of Indoor and Outdoor Combustion and Ventilation Opening Design) D. Section 808.0 of said California Code is amended to read as follows:

Section 808.0, Cooling Water. Discharge of cooling water into the sanitary sewer system is prohibited. Refer to Section 13.08.500 of City of V isalia Municipal Code (Prohibition on Unpolluted Water).

E. Reference is made to three copies of the 2022 California Plumbing Code, one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in th e office of building safety division of the city, which are now so filed for full particulars of said Plumbing Code.

15.24.10 Adoption of 2022 California Mechanical Code.
311
A. That certain mechanical code, in book form known an d designated as the 2022 California Mechanical Code, Title 24, part 4 as Published by t he International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, based on the 2021 Uniform Mechanical, adopted as the mechanical code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, subparagraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein, including the appendices, except for those deletions, modifications, and amendments set forth below. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

1. Any person who shall violate any of the provisio ns of the code adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply w ith any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder or any certificate or permit is sued thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken or who shall fail to comply with such order as affirmed or modified by the city attorney based on a recommendation of t he building official or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and non-compliance respectively be guilty of a misdemeanor, or infraction as determined by the city attorney.

2. Such violation shall be subject to penalties in accordance with Section 1.12.010.

B. Appeals Board section 1.8.8 shall be deleted. Refer to 2022 California Building Code Section

1.8.8 as amended.

C. Included specifically are 2022 California Mechanica l Code Appendix B (Procedures to be followed to Place Gas Equipment into operation) and C (Installation and testing of oil (liquid) fuel-fired equipment).

D. Reference is made to three copies of the 2022 California Mechanical Code, one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in the office of building safety division of the city, which are now so filed for full particulars of said Mechanical Code.

15.28.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Electrical Code.

A. That certain electrical code, in book form known and designated as the 2022 California Electrical Code, Title 24, Part 3, Published by BNI Productions, Inc. based on the 2020 National electrical code, copyright 2019 National Fire Production Association, is adopted as the Electric Code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, subparagraph, word, phrase, or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this chapter is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

1. Any person who shall violate any of the provisio ns of the code adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply with any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder or any certificate or permit issued thereunder, and from which no 312
appeal has been taken or who shall fail to comply with such order as affirmed or modified by the city attorney based on a recommendation of the building official or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and non-compliance respectively be guilty of a misdemeanor, or infraction as determined by the city attorney.

2. Such violation shall be subject to penalties in accordance with Section 1.12.010.

B. Appeals Board section 89.108.8 shall be deleted. Refer to 2022 California Building Code Section 1.8.8 as amended.

C. Included specifically are 2022 California Electrical Code Annexes A and B.

D. Reference is made to three copies of the 2022 California Electrical Code, one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in the office of building safety division of the city, which are now so filed for full particulars of said electrical code.

15.36.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Historical Building Code.

A. That certain building conservation code, in book fo rm known and designated as the 2022 California Historical Building Code, California cod e and Regulations Title 24, part 8 as prepared and published by the International Code Council, is adopted as the Historical Building Code of the city, to all intents and purposes and t o the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, subparagraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

B. Reference is made to three copies of the 2022 Calif ornia Historical Building Code, one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in the office of building safety division of the city, which are now so filed for full particula rs of said 2022 California Historical Building Code.

15.64.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Residential Code A. That certain residential buildings code in book for m known and designated as the 2022 California Residential Code, as prepared and publis hed by the International Code Council is adopted as the Residential Code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, word, phra se or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein, except for those deletions, modifications, and amendments set forth below. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

1. Any person who shall violate any of the provisio ns of the code adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply w ith any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder or any certificate or permit is sued thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken or who shall fail to comply with such order as affirmed or modified 313
by the city attorney based on a recommendation of t he building official or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and non-compliance respectively be guilty of a misdemeanor, or infraction as determined by the city attorney.

2. Such violation shall be subject to penalties in accordance with Section 1.12.010.

B. Appeals Board section 1.8.7 shall be deleted. Refer to 2022 California Building Code Section

1.8.8 as amended.

C. Included specifically are the 2022 California Resid ential Code Appendix AH (Patio Covers), AQ (Tiny Houses), AS (Strawbale Construction), AY ( Areas Protected by the Facilities of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan), and AZ (Emergency Housing).

D. Reference is made to three copies of the 2022 California Residential Code, one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in the office of building safety division of the city, which are now so filed for full particulars of said 2022 California Residential Code.

15.68.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code.

A. That certain green standards building code in book form known and designated as the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, as prepar ed and published by the International Code Council is adopted as the Green Building Standards Code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and ever y section, paragraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein, except for those deletions, modifications, and amendments set forth below. If any section, sub section, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is for any reason, held to be unconsti tutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

B. Included specifically are the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code Appendix A4 (Residential Voluntary Measures), and A5 (Nonreside ntial Voluntary Measures) including Tiers 1 & 2 which will remain voluntary measures.

C. Reference is made to three copies of the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in the office of building safety division of the city, which are now so filed for full partic ulars of said 2022 California Green Building Standards Code.

15.72.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Energy Code
A. That certain energy standards code in book form known and designated as the 2022 California Energy Code, as prepared and published by the International Code Council is adopted as the Energy Code of the city, to all intents and purpose s and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein, except for those deletions, modifications, and amen dments set forth below. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chap ter is for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect th e validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.
314
B. Reference is made to three copies of the 2022 Calif ornia Energy Code one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in th e office of building safety division of the city, which are now so filed for full particulars of said 2022 California Energy Code.

15.76.10 Adoption of the 2022 California Existing Buildings Code A. That certain existing buildings code in book form known and designated as the 2022 California Existing Buildings Code, as prepared and published by the International Code Council is adopted as the Existing Buildings Code of the city, to all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein, except for those deletions, modifications, and amendments set forth below. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the chapter.

B. Reference is made to three copies of the 202 Califo rnia Existing Buildings Code, one copy filed in the office of the city clerk and two copies filed in the office of building safety division of the city, which are now so filed for full particula rs of said 2022 California Existing Buildings Code.

Section 2. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code, sections 17958.7 and 18941.5 because of local climatic, topographical or geological conditions th e City of Visalia hereby finds that the following appendices and code section amendments are necessary. It is noted that these appendices and code section amendments are referenced above, but are also listed below to clarify that they have been found to be necessary and that they have been added by the City of Visalia:

A. The following appendices and code sections are a dopted by reference as necessary due to the local climatic, topographical, or geologic conditions, which are described in further detail in this Section 2:

• 2022 California Building Code Appendices C (Group U – Agricultural Buildings), F (Rodent proofing), H (Signs), I (Patio Covers), J (Grading) and P (Emergency Housing). • 2022 California Plumbing Code Appendix A (Recommen ded Rules for Sizing the Water Supply System), B (Explanatory Notes on Combination Waste & Vent Systems), D (Sizing Storm Water Drainage Systems), H (Private Sewage Di sposal Systems), I (Installation Standards for PEX Tubing Systems for Hot- and Cold- Water Distribution), and J (Combination of Indoor and Outdoor Combustion and Ventilation Opening Design) • Section 808.0 of the 2022 California Plumbing Code was amended to prevent the discharge of cooling water into the sanitary sewer system. Refer to Section 13.08.500 of City of Visalia Municipal Code (Prohibition on Unpolluted Water). • 2022 California Mechanical Code Appendix B (Proced ures to be followed to Place Gas Equipment into operation) and C (Installation and t esting of oil (liquid) fuel-fired equipment).
• 2022 California Residential Code Appendix AH (Pati o Covers), AQ (Tiny Houses), AS (Strawbale Construction), AY (Areas Protected by the Facilities of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan), and AZ (Emergency Housing).
315

B. The City of Visalia has found the following conc erning local climatic conditions, specifically extreme temperatures, support the adoption of the listed appendices and code amendments:

• As documented in the Visalia General Plan Visalia is characterized as having an “inland Mediterranean” climate. High temperatures a re also contributors to ozone formation, and summer high temperatures often exceed 100ºF with an all-time high of 115ºF averaging 275 sunny days per year. Climate models predict a 4ºF temperature increase in the next 20 to 40 years, with an increa se in the number of long dry spells (Visalia: 2010). Data shows that during the months of July and August, Visalia's daily high temperature has averaged in excess of 94ºF as compared to San Francisco with an average of 67ºF and San Diego having an average of 74ºF. Though Health & Safety Code § 17958.7 does not require the local condition s to be unique to a particular jurisdiction, the temperatures experienced in Visal ia are extreme as compared to temperatures experienced in other parts of California.

• The City notes that these temperatures cause frequ ent use of cooling water during these times of high heat and in order to avoid disruptions with the City’s sanitary sewer system that could be caused by cooling water discharges over the long period of high heat in Visalia the City has amended Section 808.0 to prevent the discharge of cooling water into the sanitary sewer system.

• The local climatic condition, high summer temperat ures, results in patio covers being common in the City of Visalia to provide shade arou nd homes. The City has determined to adopt 2022 California Building Code A ppendix I and 2022 California Residential Code Appendix AH to regulate these types of improvements.

• The Heat Stress Index published by the Federal Eme rgency Management Agency in its publication entitled Emergency Incident Rehabil itation sets forth the stress placed on the human body when exposed to various temperatures and humidity. A note under the Heat Stress Chart states that 10 degrees should be added to the temperature when protective clothing is worn and an additional 10 degrees should be added when the person is standing in direct sunlight. According to this chart, a person exposed to temperatures between 90 and 105 degrees is subject to heat cramps and heat exhaustion if exposure to these temperatures is pro longed and there is physical activity. A person exposed to temperatures of 105 to 130 degrees is likely to experience heat cramps and heat exhaustion. Furthermore, heat stroke is possible if exposure is prolonged and there is physical activit y. A person exposed to temperatures above 130 degrees or greater faces a h igh risk of suffering from heat stroke.

• The high levels of potential heat stress that can occur during the summer periods in Visalia raised concerns by the City for emergency r esponders, which supports the City’s adoption of the 2022 California Mechanical C ode Appendix B and Appendix C concerning the installation of equipment that could lead to serious emergency incidents if installed incorrectly, and 2022 Califo rnia Residential Code, Appendix AS, concerning straw bale construction.

316
C. As document below the City of Visalia makes the following findings concerning local geological conditions, specifically water supply and water pressure, that support the adoption of the listed appendices:

• The Visalia area is an arid area that receives an average of 11 inches of precipitation per year occurring primarily in the winter months. Furthermore, Visalia relies completely on groundwater for its water supply and the groundwater basin it is located within and has been found to be in overdraft by the State of California.

• Due to the hot, dry summers in the Visalia area, d omestic water demand can substantially reduce the ability of the public water system to dependably provide service, which supports the adoption of the referenced appendices to the 2022 California Mechanical Code needed to prevent serious emergency incidents.

• The adoption of 2022 California Plumbing Code Appe ndix A, Appendix B, Appendix I and Appendix J are necessary to prevent the loss of scarce water resources in the City of Visalia that could be caused by incorrect water supply facility installations.

D. In addition, the City of Visalia makes the follo wing findings concerning local climatic/topographical conditions, specifically air quality caused by the topography of the San Joaquin Valley air basin, number of sunny days, and inversions that form during winter months, that support the adoption of the listed appendices:

• As a result of the San Joaquin Valley's climate an d topography, the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAP) is predisposed to poor air qualit y. High mountain ranges surrounding the Valley frequently create air layer inversions that prevent mixing of air masses. The large number of sunny days per year, a nd high temperatures in the summer favors the formation of ozone. In the winter , inversions form that often trap particulate matter

• The Federal Environmental Protection Agency and th e California Air Resources Board have classified the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin as severe non-attainment for ozone and serious non-attainment (federal) non-attainment (state) for PM10. Ozone is formed by a complex series of chemical reactions be tween reactive organic gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen and sunlight. PM10 is suspended particulate matter that is less than 10 microns in size. Given its small size, PM10 can remain airborne for long periods and can be inhaled, pass through the respir atory system, and lodge in the lungs. In general, nonattainment means that the federal standard has been exceeded more than twice per year.

• Due to the local topographic conditions that impac t air quality the City of Visalia is concerned over activities that can cause additional particulate matter through dust or fire and has determined it is appropriate to adopt 2022 California Building Code Appendix J, Grading, and 2022 Appendix AS concerning Strawbale Construction.

E. City makes the following findings concerning loc al topographical conditions, specifically the City of Visalia’s development pattern, that supports the adoption of the listed appendices:

317
• There is a relatively low-density growth pattern i n the Visalia area, Visalia is in an area with a high level of agriculture that contributes h eavily to the local economy and the agricultural uses surround the community. As Visali a has expanded it sometimes annexes areas that were remain used for agriculture. This local topographic condition has resulted in areas consisting of former rural developments being incorporated into the City with areas of mixed rural and urban usage along with rural uses being immediately adjacent to urban uses.

• This local topographical condition supports the Ci ty’s adoption of 2022 California Building Code Group Appendix C Group U – (Agricultu ral Buildings) and Appendix F (Rodent Proofing).

• The City’s local topographical condition, its deve lopment pattern has led to numerous areas of residential housing being built on large lots, that are now available for use as secondary rental units or multigenerational homes on the same lots by building a small accessory dwelling unit, due to this local topographic condition, the City finds that the adoption of 2022 California Residential Code Append ix AQ (Tiny Houses) is needed to oversee potential construction of this type of housing.

• The City also finds that this local topographic co ndition, existing rural development that has been incorporated into the City of Visalia, has led to numerous private sewer systems within the city limits. The City of Visalia has a public sewer system and has recently spent over one hundred million dollars upd ating its wastewater treatment plant, but still needs to deal with older homes and private sewage disposal systems.

Therefore, the City has determined that it is appropriate for it to adopt 2022 California Plumbing Code Appendix H (Private Sewage Disposal Systems).

F. The City of Visalia makes the following findings concerning the local topographic, geographical, and climatic conditions of potential flooding within Visalia:
• The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) pro vides maps that estimate flood hazards throughout the United States and area s within the City of Visalia have been found to be considered by FEMA to be high risk for flooding. • It is noted that the City of Visalia is located ne ar the large alluvial fan formed by the Kaweah River and its distributary channels, historically the City of Visalia has flooded several times since it was founded in 1852, although the construction of the Terminus Dam on the Kaweah River in 1962 has drastically reduced the risk of flooding, flooding is still a possibility within the City of Visalia.
• Due to the possibility of flooding within the City of Visalia due to the local topographic, geographical, and climatic conditions, the City has adopted 2022 California Building Code Appendix P (Emergency Housing), 2022 California Plumbing Code Appendix D (Sizing of Storm Water Drainage Systems), 2022 Cali fornia Residential Code Appendix AY (Areas Protected by the Facilities of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan) and AZ (Emergency Housing) is necessary and appropriate. • It is noted that the potential for flooding is mag nified by the flat topography of Visalia, when constructing buildings in the areas in order t o avoid being designed within an elevation subject to flooding grading measures are employed to alter the base elevation. Due to this local condition that leads to grading during building construction 318
the City of Visalia has determined that 2022 Califo rnia Building Code Appendix J (Grading), should be adopted.

G. The City of Visalia makes the following findings concerning the local topographic, geographical, and climatic conditions of potential wildfire near Visalia that support the adoption of the listed appendices:
• The City of Visalia is located near the Sierra Nev ada mountains, and due to the previously described dry and hot summers the hills and mountains can be susceptible to wildfires, during such fires, residents of these areas seeking shelter often travel to Visalia, which is the largest city in Tulare County , the City of Visalia has also been utilized as a staging area for firefighting operations, which can require the emergency housing of firefighters.
• Due to these local topographic, geographical, and climatic conditions, nearby wildfires, the City of Visalia has adopted 2022 California Building Code Appendix P (Emergency Housing) and 2022 California Residential Code Appen dix AZ (Emergency Housing) and notes that during these events, alternative for ms of housing, such as tiny homes could supply housing, further supporting the City’s decision to adopt 2022 California Residential Code Appendix AQ (Tiny Homes).

Section 3. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The Council of the City of Visalia hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, se ntences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional.

Section 4. That nothing in this ordinance hereby adopted shall be construed to affect any suit or proceeding impending in any court, or any rights ac quired, or liability incurred, or any cause or causes of action acquired or existing, under any ac t or ordinance hereby repealed by this ordinance; nor shall any just or legal right or remedy of any character be lost, impaired or affected by this ordinance.

Section 5. That this ordinance and the rules, regulations, pro visions, requirements, orders and matters established and adopted hereby shall take e ffect and be in full force and effect 30 days after final passage and adoptions but not earlier than January 1, 2023.

Section 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage an d adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law.

319

PASSED AND ADOPTED:

Mayor

ATTEST:

City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY CITY ATTORNEY:

City Attorney

320
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-15

AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL AND REPLACE
SECTION 8.20.010 OF THE VISALIA MUNICIPAL CODE

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VISALIA;

Section 1 . Consistent with its control over municipal affa irs and the powers vested in the City of Visalia through the California Constitution and its Charter, the City of Visalia is authorized to secure and promote the public health, comfort, safety and welfare of its citizenry. It is the intent of this ordinance that the City of Visalia adopt the California Fire Code, Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9, 2022 Edition, together with the Appendices thereto, and the California Fire Code Standards referenced therein, published by the International Code Council and hereby referred to, adopted as the Fire Code of the City of Visalia. This section shall hereinafter be referred to as the “California Fire Code”, regulating and governing the safeguarding of life and property from fire and explosion hazards arising from the storage, handling and use of hazardous substances, materials and devices, and from conditions hazardous to life or property in the occupancy of buildings and premises in the City of Visalia; providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefor. Specific findings based on local climatic, topographical, and geological conditions, pursuant to Health and Safety Code, sections 17958.7 and 18941.5, that support the adoption of the appendices and amendments to the adopted California Fire Code are included in Section 3 of this Ordinance.

Section 2 . Section 8.20.010 through 8.20.120 is hereby repealed and replaced as follows:

8.20.010 Adoption of the 2022 California Fire Code

A. There is adopted for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire, hazardous materials or explosion, that certain document, not less than one copy is filed in the office of the Fire Department and one in the office of the Building Division of City of Visalia, being marked and designated as the California Fire Code , 2022 edition published by the International Code Council, including Appendix Chapters 4 (Special Detailed requirements Based on Use and Occupancy), B (Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings), C (Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution), D (Fire Apparatus Access Roads as amended by section L), H (Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP) and Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement (HMIS) Instructions), I (Fire Protection Systems- Noncompliant Conditions), N (Indoor Trade Shows and Exhibitions) and O (Temporary Haunted Houses, Ghost Walks and Similar Amusement Uses), as published by the International Code Council, be and is hereby adopted as the Fire Code of the City of Visalia, in the State of California regulating and governing the safeguarding of life and property from fire and explosion hazards arising from the storage, handling and use of hazardous substances, materials and devices, and from conditions hazardous to life or property in the occupancy of buildings and premises as herein provided; providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefor; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said Fire Code on file in the office of the City of Visalia are hereby referred to, adopted, and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance, with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes, if any, prescribed this section 8.20.010.

B. All further references shall be to the 2022 Cali fornia Fire Code, in Subsection 101.1 of the, the term “City of Visalia” shall be inserted .

C. Subsection 104.3.1.1. Warrant cost recovery, is added to read as follows:

321
104.3.1.1 Warrant cost recovery. Cost to the City of Visalia for obtaining and executing an Inspection Warrant is the responsibility of the property owner and steps to recover the costs will be taken, up to and including a lien against the property. Recovery costs may include staff time, legal fees, and court fees.

D. Subsection 111.1 Board of Appeals is amended to read as follows:

111.1 Appeals. See local Ordinance, Appeals Section 8.20.070

E. Subsection 111.1 through 111.4 shall be deleted in their entirety.

F. Subsection 112.4 Change: Violation penalties, is amended to read as follows:

112.4 Violations penalties. Persons who shall violate a prevision of this code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the fire code official, or a permit or certificate used under provision of this code, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, infraction or both. Penalties shall be as prescribed in local Ordinance Section 1.12.010.

Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be deemed a separate offense.

G. Subsection 112.5 Cost of abatement, is added to read as follows:

112.5 Cost of abatement. Cost of abatement is the responsibility of the property owner and steps to recover the costs will be taken, up to and including a lien against the property.

Property owners shall be notified of any action taken as soon as possible. Recovery costs may include staff time, contractor’s costs, legal fees and any and all cost associated with the abatement.

H. Subsection 113.4 Change: Failure to comply, is amended to read as follows:

113.4 Failure to Comply. Any person who shall continue any work after having been served with a stop work order, except such work as that person is directed to perform to remove a violation or unsafe condition, shall be liable to a fine prescribed in local Ordinance Section

1.12.010.

I. Subsection 107.7 Added: Visalia Fire Department Fee Schedule, is added to read as follows:

107.7 Visalia Fire Department Fee Schedule. The Fire Chief may establish a schedule of fees, as approved by the City Council, to be charged and collected for plan checking, required inspections services, and for the issuance of permits pursuant to Section 105 of this Code. In addition, this schedule may include a fire service Cost Recovery fee to be charged to any person, firm, corporation or business that through negligence, violation of the law or as a result of carelessness is responsible for the cause of any fire service response to the scene of such an incident. A copy of the fee schedule shall be kept in the office of the City Clerk and the Office of the Fire Department and shall be available for public inspection.

J. Subsection 105.5.34 Exception, is amended to read as follows:

105.6.32 Exception: Recreational Fires, see Visalia Municipal Code Ordinance, Open Burning, Section 8.44.010.

K. Subsection 903.3.8.4.1 shall be added to read as follows:

322
903.3.8.4.1 Tamper Protection. All exterior risers, drain/test valves and backflow devices shall be protected from unauthorized tampering by approved means. Protection method shall be indicated on building plans.

L. Subsection C103.4 Buildings provided with a fire sprinkler system, is added to read as follows:

C103.4 Buildings provided with a fire sprinkler system. Any newly constructed building provided with a NFPA 13 or NFPA 13R fire sprinkler system shall provide a fire hydrant within fifty (50) feet of the fire department connection. Where an existing building is retrofitted with a NFPA 13 or NFPA 13R fire sprinkler system a fire hydrant shall be provided within seventy-five (75) feet of the fire department connection.

C103.4.1 An additional twenty-five (25) feet of distance between a fire hydrant and the fire department connection (FDC) may be granted by the Fire Marshal when a fire sprinkler system density is designed with an additional 25%.

Exceptions: The additional twenty-five (25) feet o f distance between a fire hydrant and the fire department connection (FDC) shall not be permitted for Pipe scheduled and ESFR sprinkler systems.

M. Section D106 where required, “apparatus access roads” shall be available to public travel at all times.

N. Subsection D107.1 Shall read as follows:

One- or two-family dwelling residential developments. Developments of one- two family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved access roads available to public travel at all times.

O. Subsection D107.1, Exception 1. shall be deleted in its entirety.

8.20.020 Establishment authority and responsibilities.

A. The fire marshal under the authority of the fire chief is hereby authorized to enforce the provisions of the California Fire Code and shall have the authority to render interpretations of the code, and to adopt policies, procedures, rules and regulations in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, policies, procedures, rules and regulations shall be in compliance with the intent and purpose of the code and shall not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically provided for in the code.

B. The fire marshal may authorize fire inspectors a nd other members of the fire department as deemed necessary to enforce the provisions of the fire code.

C. A report of the fire prevention division shall b e made annually to the city manager as part of the fire departments annual report. The fire marshal under the authority of the fire chief shall also recommend any amendments to the code which, in his/her judgment are desirable.

8.20.030 Definitions.

Fire Code Official. Whenever the term “fire code official” is used in the California Fire Code, it means fire marshal of the fire department.

Municipality. Whenever the term “municipality” is used in the California Fire Code, it means the City of Visalia.

8.20.040 Establishment of limits of storage of flammable liquids in outside aboveground tanks and bulk storage of liquefied petroleum gases.

323
The limits referring to storage of flammable liquids in outside aboveground tanks and bulk storage of liquefied petroleum gases in the California Fire Code is to be restricted shall be regulated by the city zoning ordinance. Where the zoning ordinance is silent about the permitted or conditional use the omission shall be considered prima facie evidence of clear intent to prohibit the act.

8.20.050 Modifications.

Where there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this code, the fire marshal shall have the authority to grant modifications for individual cases, provided the fire marshal shall first find that special individual reason makes the strict letter of the code impractical and the modification is in compliance with the intent and purpose of the code and that such modification does not lessen health, life and fire safety requirements. The details of action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the department of fire prevention.

8.20.060 Alternative materials and methods.

The fire marshal shall have power to approve alternative materials and methods where he or she finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the intent of the provisions of the California Fire Code. Where the alternative material, design or method of construction is not approved, the fire marshal shall respond in writing, stating the reasons why the alternative was not approved.

8.20.070 Appeals.

Whenever the fire marshal and or chief of the fire department disapprove an application or refuse to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal the decision of the fire marshal and or chief of the fire department to the city manager within thirty (30) days from the date of the decision.

8.20.080 New materials, processes or occupancies which may require permits.

A. The city manager, the chief of the fire departme nt, fire marshal and the chief building official shall act as a committee to determine and specify, after giving affected persons an opportunity to be heard, any new materials, processes or occupancy, which shall require permits, in addition to those now enumerated in said code.

B. The fire chief shall post such list in conspicuo us place in his/her office and distribute copies thereof to interested persons. (Prior code § 4408)

8.20.090 Capacity of tank trucks.

The capacity of compartments of tank trucks used in the delivery of Class I flammable liquids in retail lots and for retail purposes within the city shall be limited to one thousand two hundred (1,200) gallons. (Prior code § 4450)

8.20.100 Special permits.

The chief of the fire department may, at his discretion, issue special permits for the entrance into the city of tank trucks of greater than one thousand two hundred (1,200) gallon compartment capacity for the purpose of making delivery of Class I flammable liquids to retail distribution stations, but not otherwise; provided, such permits shall be restricted to deliveries at locations where unusual hazards will not be created by such larger capacity trucks; provided, 324
that no such tank trucks, carrying Class I flammable liquid, shall be parked or left unattended on any street, highway, avenue or alley of the city. (Prior code § 4451)

8.20.110 Penalties.

Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of the code adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply with any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specification or plans submitted and approved thereunder or any certificate or permit issued thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken or who shall fail to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by the city attorney or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and noncompliance respectively be guilty of a misdemeanor or infraction as determined by the city attorney, and shall be assessed administrative penalties pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1.13 of the Visalia Municipal Code. These penalties may accrue and each day the property is not in compliance shall be considered another violation.

Section 3. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code, sections 17958.7 and 18941.5 because of local climatic, topographical or geological conditions the City of Visalia hereby finds that the following appendices and code section amendments to the 2022 California Fire Code are necessary as measures intended to reduce the occurrence and severity of fires in the City of Visalia and contains items to assist the Visalia Fire Department in responding to emergency incidents. It is noted that these appendices and code section amendments are referenced above in the ordinance sections being modified, but are also listed below to clarify that they have been found to be necessary and that they have been added by the City of Visalia:

A. The following appendices and code sections are a dopted by reference as necessary due to the local climatic, topographical, or geologic conditions which are described in further detail below that create hazards in responding to severe fires within the City of Visalia:

• Appendix Chapters 4 (Special Detailed requirements Based on Use and Occupancy),
• Appendix B (Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings),
• Appendix C (Fire Hydrant Locations and Distributio n), • Appendix D (Fire Apparatus Access Roads as amended by section L), • Appendix H (Hazardous Materials Management Plan (H MMP) and Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement (HMIS) Instructions),
• Appendix I (Fire Protection Systems- Noncompliant Conditions), • Appendix N (Indoor Trade Shows and Exhibitions) an d
• Appendix O (Temporary Haunted Houses, Ghost Walks and Similar Amusement Uses), as published by the International Code Council, be and is hereby adopted as the Fire Code of the City of Visalia

B. The City of Visalia has found the following conc erning local climatic conditions, specifically extreme temperatures, support the adoption of the listed appendices:

• As documented in the Visalia General Plan Visalia is characterized as having an “inland Mediterranean” climate. High temperatures a re also contributors to ozone formation, and summer high temperatures often exceed 100ºF with an all-time high of 115ºF averaging 275 sunny days per year. Climate models predict a 4ºF temperature increase in the next 20 to 40 years, with an increa se in the number of long dry spells (Visalia: 2010). Data shows that during the months of July and August, Visalia's daily high temperature has averaged in excess of 94ºF as compared to San Francisco with an average of 67ºF and San Diego having an average of 74ºF. 325
• During the winter months Visalia experiences exten ded periods of cold weather.

During the months of December and January the avera ge low temperature is 38ºF with an all-time low of 13ºF, compared to San Franc isco with a low of 47ºF and San Diego with a low of 49ºF. Though Health & Safety Co de § 17958.7 does not require the local conditions to be unique to a particular j urisdiction, the aforementioned temperatures experienced in Visalia are extreme as compared to temperatures experienced in other parts of California.
• The Heat Stress Index published by the Federal Eme rgency Management Agency in its publication entitled Emergency Incident Rehabil itation sets forth the stress placed on the human body when exposed to various temperatures and humidity. A note under the Heat Stress Chart states that 10 degrees should be added to the temperature when protective clothing is worn and an additional 10 degrees should be added when the person is standing in direct sunlight. According to this chart, a person exposed to temperatures between 90 and 105 degrees is subject to heat cramps and heat exhaustion if exposure to these temperatures is pro longed and there is physical activity. A person exposed to temperatures of 105 to 130 degrees is likely to experience heat cramps and heat exhaustion. Furthermore, heat stroke is possible if exposure is prolonged and there is physical activit y. A person exposed to temperatures above 130 degrees or greater faces a h igh risk of suffering from heat stroke (USFA: July 2008).
• Because of the extreme heat Visalia experiences du ring the summer months, Visalia Fire Fighters responding to fires and other inciden ts requiring the evacuation of a building are regularly exposed to temperatures in e xcess of 105 degrees. High temperatures and protective gear exposes fire perso nal to the probability of heat cramps, heat exhaustion and possibly heat stroke.

C. In addition, the City of Visalia makes the follo wing findings concerning local geological conditions, specifically water supply and water pressure, support the adoption of the listed appendices:

• The Visalia area is an arid area that receives an average of 11 inches of precipitation per year occurring primarily in the winter months. Furthermore, Visalia relies completely on groundwater for its water supply and the groundwater basin it is located within and has been found to be in overdraft by the State of California. • Due to the hot, dry summers in the Visalia area, d omestic water demand can substantially reduce the ability of the public water system to dependably meet the large fire flow demand requirements in many areas of the city. According to the City of Visalia’s General Plan “Public safety should be a top priority for the use of water.”

D. As documented below the City of Visalia makes th e following findings concerning local climatic/topographical conditions, specifically air quality caused by the topography of the San Joaquin Valley air basin, number of sunny days, and inversions that form during winter months, that support the adoption of the listed appendices:

• As a result of the San Joaquin Valley's climate an d topography, the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAP) is predisposed to poor air qualit y. High mountain ranges surrounding the Valley frequently create air layer inversions that prevent mixing of air masses. The large number of sunny days per year, a nd high temperatures in the summer favors the formation of ozone. In the winter , inversions form that often trap particulate matter
• The Federal Environmental Protection Agency and th e California Air Resources Board have classified the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin as severe non-attainment for ozone and serious non-attainment (federal) non-attainment (state) for PM10. Ozone is formed by a complex series of chemical reactions be tween reactive organic gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen and sunlight. PM10 is suspended particulate matter that is less than 10 microns in size. Given its small size, PM10 can remain airborne for long 326
periods and can be inhaled, pass through the respir atory system, and lodge in the lungs. In general, nonattainment means that the federal standard has been exceeded more than twice per year.
• Smoke is composed primarily of carbon dioxide, wat er vapor, carbon monoxide, particulate matter, hydrocarbons and other organic chemicals, nitrogen oxides, trace minerals and several thousand other compounds. Par ticulate matter is the principal pollutant of concern from some for the relatively short-term exposures (hours to weeks) typically experienced by the public. Particulate matter in wood smoke has a size range near the wavelength of visible light (.4-.7 micrometers) because these particles can be inhaled into the deepest recesses of the lungs, they are thought to represent a greater health concern than larger particles. Another pollutant of concern during some events is carbon monoxide (Wildfire smoke 2001). the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District states "Emissions from burning include fin e particulate, hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, carbon monoxide, and toxic air contaminants that contribute to our air quality problems.

E. City makes the following findings concerning loc al topographical conditions, specifically the City of Visalia’s development pattern, that supports the adoption of the listed appendices:

• Due to the relatively low-density growth pattern i n the Visalia area, likely due to the large amounts of agricultural business that contribute heavily to the local economy and the agricultural uses surround the community, its 6 fire stations are spaced approximately 3.4 miles apart resulting in an avera ge of a 1.7 mile running distance for the designated first-in engine company.
• This average 1.7-mile travel distance increases th e response time to fires which result in an increase in the size and intensity of fires. Fires have the potential to require the response of all on-duty personnel in the City of Vi salia, which depletes all available resources. This leaves the city dependent on off-duty personnel and outside agencies to cover the city.

F. The appendices and modifications to the Californ ia Fire Code by the City of Visalia are reasonably necessary because of the above described local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions that apply when City staff respond to fires. The referenced appendices and sections are intended to reduce the incidence of fires; the severity of fire incidents in the City of Visalia; and to provide for a safer community. For reference the following documents support the findings concerning the local conditions cited above:

• Visalia General Plan Update (2014)
• Historical Temperature Data: https://www.weatherba se.com • U.S. Fire Administration. (July 2008). Emergency i ncident rehabilitation. (FEMA fa- 314). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Wildfire Smoke – A Guide for Public Health Officia ls (2001) Published by the Washington State Department of Health, p. 3.

Section 4. That all City of Visalia Ordinances with the term “Uniform Fire Code” shall change to “2022 California Fire Code” and all other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 5. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The Council of the City of Visalia hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional.

327
Section 6. That nothing in this ordinance or in the Fire Code hereby adopted shall be construed to affect any suit or proceeding impending in any court, or any rights acquired, or liability incurred, or any cause or causes of action acquired or existing, under any act or ordinance hereby repealed as cited in Section 5 of this ordinance; nor shall any just or legal right or remedy of any character be lost, impaired or affected by this ordinance.

Section 7. That this ordinance and the rules, regulations, provisions, requirements, orders and matters established and adopted hereby shall take effect and be in full force and effect 30 days after final passage and adoptions but not earlier than January 1, 2023.

Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED:

Mayor

ATTEST:

City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY CITY ATTORNEY:

City Attorney
328
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 22-0449 Agenda Date: 12/5/2022 Agenda #:

Agenda Item Wording:

UPCOMING COUNCIL MEETINGS:

Monday, December 19, 2022 at 7:00 p.m., 707 W. Acequia
Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 7:00 p.m., 707 W. Acequia
Visalia City Council Printed on 12/2/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
329