Agenda packet — Visalia City Council, August 7, 2023 (part 6 of 8)

Police
Law enforcement services are provided to the project site via The Visalia Police Department (VPD).

The VPD will continue to provide police protection services to the proposed project site following project implementation. The VPD headquarters are located approximately 3.6 miles Northeast of the proposed project site. VPD Substation District 2 is located approximately 2.3 miles Southeast of the project site.

Schools
The proposed project site is located within the Visalia Unified School District (VUSD) from Kindergarten through 12th Grade. The District includes 25 elementary schools, four middle schools, four traditional high schools, and alternative education programs. The nearest school is located approximately .63 miles West (El Diamante High School).

Regulatory Setting
California Fire Code
The California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9 of the California Code of Regulations) establishes regulations to safeguard against hazards of fire, explosion, or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, 1201
3-83
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 structures, and premises. The provisions of the Fire Code apply to the construction, alteration, movement, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance, removal, and demolition of every building or structure throughout the State of California. The Fire Code includes regulations regarding fire-resistance-rated construction, fire protection systems such as alarm and sprinkler systems, fire services features such as fire apparatus access roads, means of egress, fire safety during construction and demolition, and wildland-urban interface areas.

City of Visalia Fire Department Plan Check and Hydrant Ordinance Visalia’s requirements for new construction include provisions for the Fire Department to review building and site plans prior to the issuance of any permit. The Fire Department ensures that proposed projects will be adequately served by water, and accessible to emergency vehicles. The Department also enforces the City’s Hydrant Ordinance, which states that subdividers are responsible for the installation of water mains and hydrants and determines the minimum spacing for fire hydrants.

Street dimensions are scrutinized to ensure that space will be preserved for ladder trucks to be stabilized, and for emergency vehicles to turn around. Basic requirements in the City’s subdivision ordinance include 52-foot minimum right-of-way widths and a 53-foot turning radius for cul-de-sacs.

City of Visalia General Plan
The 2030 General Plan includes the policies related to public services that correlate to the proposed project:
• PSCU-P-33: Coordinate land use and development with school location and site design, working with the Visalia Unified School District and other districts to ensure that adequate facilities are available and integrated with neighborhoods.

Discussion
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable serve ratios, response times of other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a. Fire protection?
Less than Significant Impact: The VFD will provide fire protection services to the proposed development. The closest fire station is Station #53, located .77 miles Northeast of the project site at 5025 W Walnut Ave. The Fire Department uses the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard for fire protection services, which requires 1 responder per 1,000 residents. The addition of 136 residential units will increase the demand for fire protection services. The city currently has .48 responders per 1,000 residents. By 2030, the city expects growth up to a total of 210,000 residents. This would result in .32 responders per 1,000 residents. This will require an additional 85 on-duty responders by 2030 to meet 1 responder per 1,000 residents, or 41 new responders to meet the current ratio. The existing fire stations are placed to provide optimum service, however new stations will be needed to support the expanding city. To support the expansion of fire services, a development impact fee of $2,002 per gross acre will be paid for fire services. The total development impact fee for fire services would be $138,839. 1202
3-84
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 The timing of when new fire service facilities would be required or details about size and location cannot be known until such facilities are planned and proposed, and any attempt to analyze impacts to a potential future facility would be speculative. As new or expanded fire service facilities become necessary, construction or expansion projects would be subject to their own separate CEQA review in order to identify and mitigate any potential environmental impacts.

Therefore, the impact is less than significant.
b. Police protection?
Less than Significant Impact: The VPD will provide services to the proposed development. The VPD headquarters are located approximately 3.6 miles Northeast of the proposed project site.

VPD Substation District 2 is located approximately 2.3 miles Southeast of the project site. The development would increase the demand for police service with the addition of 136 residential units. The VPD does not establish service standards either in terms of officers per thousand residents or in incident response time but plans to maintain the current ratio of 1.7 officers per 1,000 residents. The Department has 143 sworn officers working out of two districts, as well as seven reserve sworn officers, 64 civilian officers, and 65 volunteers. The demand for additional officers and equipment will be compensated by the development impact fee of $ 1,832 per acre of Low-Density Housing. The total development impact fee for police protection services would be $127,049.

The timing of when new police service facilities would be required or details about size and location cannot be known until such facilities are planned and proposed, and any attempt to analyze impacts to a potential future facility would be speculative. As new or expanded police service facilities become necessary, construction or expansion projects would be subject to their own separate CEQA review in order to identify and mitigate any potential environmental impacts. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. c. Schools?
Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project is within the (VUSD) from Kindergarten through 12th Grade. The District includes 25 elementary schools, four middle schools, four traditional high schools, and alternative education programs. The City of Visalia predicts the generation rates shown below in Table 3-17.

School Type Single Family Generation Rate Number of Students Elementary School 0.448 61
Middle School .092 13
High School .156 21
Table 3-17: Student Generation Rates, City of Visalia General Plan 1203
3-85
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Since the proposed project includes the addition of 136 single family homes, the number of students will increase by approximately 95. The proposed project site is located within the Planning Area’s limits and therefore, growth associated with the Project has been planned and expected. In addition to the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan, future development is required to pay development impact fees to the school districts at the time of building permit issuance. The City of Visalia charges $4.41 per square foot of residential development. This would total up to $1,079,568. These impact fees are used by the school districts to maintain existing and develop new facilities, as needed. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. d. Parks?

Less than Significant Impact: The addition of 136 new residential units would result in more use of the existing parks. Parks within a half-mile to one-mile radius that would service the proposed development include Sunset Park and John Combs Park. The project plans to include 3.7 acres of parkland with walking trails. Since the project would not lower the existing level of services for parks, and the proposed project would contribute its fair share to parks facilities through in-lieu fees, the impact is less than significant.
e. Other public facilities?
Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project would be required to pay a development impact fee for Public Facilities, including for the Civic Center, Corporation Yard, and Libraries. The fees for these are $602 per single family unit. This is a total of $81,872 for Public Facilitates.

Additional development fees will be paid to offset the increased demand for public services related to transportation, water, wastewater, groundwater recharge, storm drainage, and general governmental services. Fees for transportation, water, wastewater, and general government are based on building square footage and will be calculated prior to the issuance of building permits.

Fees for groundwater recharge and storm drainage are based on site acreage.

While the payment of development fees could result in the construction of new or altered public service facilities, no specific projects have been identified at this time. As new or expanded public service facilities become necessary, construction or expansion projects would be subject to their own separate CEQA review in order to identify and mitigate any potential environmental impacts.

Therefore, the impact is less than significant.
1204
3-86
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 XVI. PARKS AND RECREATION
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
   
b) Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
   
Environmental Setting
There are 40 park facilities totaling 678 acres within the Visalia Planning Area. The City of Visalia provides diverse types of parks and open space facilities, or park types, to meet park and open space recreation needs of the community. Park types include:
• Pocket Parks: A park typically between one-half and two acres in size intended to serve the needs of a specific neighborhood within a half-mile radius. There are currently 17 pocket parks in Visalia. • Neighborhood Parks: A park typically 2 to 5 acres in size that provides basic recreation activities for one or more neighborhoods. There are currently 19 neighborhood parks in Visalia. • Community Parks: A park typically ranging from 5 to 12 acres in size or larger, which are intended to serve the recreational needs of a larger area of the city. There are currently 4 community parks in Visalia.
• Large City Parks: A park generally larger than 40 acres in size intended to serve the recreational needs of all city residents and to create opportunities for contact with the natural environment.

These parks may include a concentration of sports fields, golf courses, and areas for picnicking and passive enjoyment of open space. There are currently 2 large city parks in Visalia. • Natural Corridors and Greenways: A network of greenways of varying size intended to serve the recreational needs of city residents. These parks may include facilities such as bikeways, walkways, and riding trails, and are primarily developed along the city’s waterways. There is a total of 196 acres of natural corridors and greenways.

The Visalia Planning Area additionally contains two county parks and a public golf course. The golf course is not counted to the total amount of parkland. The Visalia General Plan states a total parkland standard of five acres of city parkland per 1,000 residents.

Regulatory Setting
Quimby Act
The 1975 Quimby Act (California Government Code section 66477) authorized cities and counties to pass ordinances requiring that developers set aside land, donate conservation easements, or pay fees 1205
3-87
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 for park improvements. The Act states that the dedication requirement of parkland can be a minimum of three acres per thousand residents or more and up to five acres per thousand residents if the existing ratio is greater than the minimum standard. Revenues generated through in-lieu fees collected and the Quimby Act cannot be used for the operation and maintenance of park facilities. In 1982, the Act was substantially amended. The amendments further defined acceptable uses of or restrictions on Quimby funds, provided acreage/population standards and formulas for determining the exaction, and indicated that the exactions must be closely tied (nexus) to a project’s impacts as identified through studies required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

City of Visalia General Plan
The 2030 General Plan includes the policies related to parks and recreation that correlate to the proposed project:
• PSCU-P-2: Strive to achieve and maintain a citywide standard of at least five acres of neighborhood and community parks per 1,000 residents.
• PSCU-P-7: Promote development of small pocket parks or play lots dispersed throughout new neighborhoods and in existing neighborhoods, where needed, on a voluntary basis in coordination with new infill development, consistent with the following planning guidelines:
o Size: 0.5 to 2 acres; and
o Facilities: the specific features of pocket parks should address the anticipated needs of nearby residents and/or workers. In a residential environment, the needs of small children and seniors should be emphasized. In mixed-use or commercial areas, lunchtime use by office workers and shoppers should be facilitated. • PSCU-P-10: Adopt and implement parkland dedication requirements for all subdivisions, consistent with the Quimby Act and Policy PSCU-P-2. This requirement will be integrated with the City’s Park Acquisition Development Fee Program.

Discussion
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project is anticipated to increase the Visalia population by approximately 407 residents. Based on the desired parkland ratio of five acres per 1000 residents identified in the Visalia General Plan, the Project would need to provide approximately 2.03 acres of parkland/open space. The project has 3.7 acres of parkland, more than the required amount. The impact is less than significant.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact: The proposed project does not include any recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of any recreational facilities that would have an adverse physical effect on the environment. There is no impact.
1206
3-88
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 XVII. TRANSPORTATION

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities?
   
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with the CEQA
guidelines Section 15064.3, Subdivision (b)?    
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
   
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?    
Environmental Setting
Vehicular Access
Vehicular access to the project is available via South Roeben Street on the East side of the site, and South Shirk Road (Road 92) on the West side of the site. The project includes a network of local streets that provide full access to the project site.

Parking
Each Single-Family home will contain at least a two-car garage, as well as room for two more cars in the driveway. Street parking will be limited due to reduced street widths. During construction, workers will utilize existing parking areas and/or temporary construction staging areas for parking of vehicles and equipment.

Regulatory Setting
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, Subdivision (b): Criteria for Analyzing Transportation Impacts (1) Land Use Projects. Vehicle miles traveled exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact. Generally, projects within one-half mile of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high-quality transit corridor should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. Projects that decrease vehicle miles traveled in the project area compared to existing conditions should be considered to have a less than significant transportation impact.
(2) Transportation Projects. Transportation projects that reduce, or have no impact on, vehicle miles traveled should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. For roadway capacity projects, agencies have discretion to determine the appropriate measure of transportation impact consistent with CEQA and other applicable requirements. To the extent that such impacts have already been adequately addressed at a programmatic level, a lead agency may tier from that analysis as provided in Section 15152. (3) Qualitative Analysis. If existing models or methods are not available to estimate the vehicle miles traveled for the particular project being considered, a lead agency may analyze the project’s vehicle miles traveled qualitatively. Such a qualitative analysis would evaluate factors such as the 1207
3-89
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 availability of transit, proximity to other destinations, etc. For many projects, a qualitative analysis of construction traffic may be appropriate.
(4) Methodology. A lead agency has discretion to choose the most appropriate methodology to evaluate a project’s vehicle miles traveled, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household or in any other measure. A lead agency may use models to estimate a project’s vehicle miles traveled and may revise those estimates to reflect professional judgment based on substantial evidence. Any assumptions used to estimate vehicle miles traveled and any revisions to model outputs should be documented and explained in the environmental document prepared for the project. The standard of adequacy in Section 15151 shall apply to the analysis described in this section.

City of Visalia Standard Specifications
The City of Visalia Standard Specifications are developed and enforced by the City of Visalia Public Works Department to guide the development and maintenance of streets within the City. The crosssection drawings contained in the City’s Standard Specifications dictate the development of roads within the City.

City of Visalia General Plan:

The 2030 General Plan includes the policies related to transportation that correlate to the proposed project:
• T-P-3: Design and build future roadways that complement and enhance the existing network, as shown on the General Plan Circulation Diagram, to ensure that each new and existing roadway continues to function as intended.
• T-P-5: Take advantage of opportunities to consolidate driveways, access points, and curb cuts along existing arterials when a change in development or a change in intensity occurs or when traffic operation or safety warrants.
• T-P-10: Manage local residential streets to limit average daily vehicle volumes to 1,500 or less and maintain average vehicle speeds between 15 and 25 miles per hour. • T-P-22: Require all residential subdivisions to be designed to discourage use of local streets as a bypass to congested arterials, and when feasible, require access to residential development to be from collector streets.
• T-P-23: Require that all new developments provide right-of-way, which may be dedicated or purchased, and improvements (including necessary grading, installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parkway/landscape strips, bike, and parking lanes) other city street design standards.

Design standards will be updated following General Plan adoption. • T-P-24: Require that proposed developments make necessary off-site improvements if the location and traffic generation of a proposed development will result in congestion on major streets or failure to meet LOS D during peak periods or if it creates safety hazards. • T-P-26: Require that future commercial developments or modifications to existing developments be designed with limited points of automobile ingress and egress, including shared access, onto major streets.
• T-P-40: Develop a community-wide trail system along selected planning area waterways, consistent with the Waterways and Trails Master Plan and General Plan diagrams. 1208
3-90
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Discussion
a) Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Less than Significant Impact: The existing General Plan established LOS “D” as the minimum acceptable LOS standard on city facilities. A traffic study prepared for the project (Appendix E) concluded that the project would not result in a significant increase in vehicle or truck trips.

Table 3-18 shows the estimated vehicle trips generated for the proposed project. The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 1,339 daily trips, including 99 AM peak hour trips (26 inbound, 73 outbound) and 133 PM peak hour trips (84 inbound, 49 outbound).

Single-Family Detached Housing
(ITE Code 210) -Project Phase
Total
Units
Daily* AM Peak Hour* PM Peak Hour*
Trips % In: Out In Out Total % In: Out In Out Total
Phase 1 43 464 26:74 9 26 35 63:37 28 17 45
Phase 2 (add 46 units) 89 906 26:74 17 50 67 63:37 56 33 89 Phase 3 (add 47 units) 136 1,339 26:74 26 73 99 63:37 84 49 133 Total Project 136 1,339 26:74 26 73 99 63:37 84 49 133
*Regression equations used based on procedure in Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, September 2017 TABLE 3-18: PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
According to the City of Visalia’s Procedures for Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), March 2021, residential developments generating less than 200 peak hour trips do not require a TIA. Therefore, as per the City’s TIA guidelines, it is anticipated the project will not require a TIA.

Whitendale Avenue does not currently exist between Shirk Road and Roeben Street. Phase 1 of the project is expected to generate approximately 464 daily trips, including 35 AM peak hour trips (9 inbound, 26 outbound) and 45 PM peak hour trips (28 inbound, 17 outbound). The number of trips generated during both the AM and PM peak hours for Phase 1 are significantly less than the total project and less than the City’s TIA guidelines that would require additional analysis.

Given that Whitendale Avenue does not currently exist, that few trips will be generated during Phase 1, and that the City’s TIA guidelines do not require analysis for residential projects generating less than 200 peak hour trips, it is not anticipated that there will be any significant impact to adjacent intersections during Phase 1 or that additional analysis should be required. The City of Visalia Traffic Impact Fee facilities list includes traffic signal projects which are not individually identified. The project will pay its fair share of traffic impact fees to support payment of the signals. There is a less than significant impact.
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, Subdivision (b)?
Less than Significant Impact: The City of Visalia’s VMT Thresholds and Implementation Guidelines (Guidelines) document, prepared by LSA and adopted on March 15, 2021, provides guidance for determining a project’s transportation impacts based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The Guidelines 1209
3-91
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 acknowledge that certain activities and projects may result in a reduction in VMT and GHG emissions and, therefore, a less than significant impact to transportation and circulation. A variety of projects may be screened out of a complicated VMT analysis due to the presumption described in the TA regarding the occurrence of less than significant impacts.

The Guidelines state: “Residential, office, or mixed‐use projects that are consistent with the City’s General Plan and located within green‐colored VMT zones, as shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8, respectively, are presumed to have similar low VMT profiles and could be screened out from further VMT analysis.” The State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research document entitled Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA dated December 2018 (OPR Guidelines) provides the reasoning for the screen out. The OPR Guidelines state: “Residential and office projects that are located in areas with low VMT, and that incorporate similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility), will tend to exhibit similarly low VMT. Maps created with VMT data, for example from a travel survey or a travel demand model, can illustrate areas that are currently below threshold VMT. Because new development in such locations would likely result in a similar level of VMT, such maps may be used to screen out residential and office projects from needing to prepare a detailed VMT analysis.”
The Project is consistent with Visalia’s General Plan land use, and the Project is within a green-colored VMT zone, shown in Figure 3-11. Therefore, the Project can be screened out will not need a VMT analysis. There is a less than significant impact.
1210
3-92
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Figure 3-11: Visalia Existing VMT per Capita
1211
3-93
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact: The project does not propose any incompatible uses or include any design features that could increase traffic hazards. The project does include two new vehicle access points on S Roeben Street and S Shirk Road. This improvement will be subject to review by the City’s engineer to ensure the new access point does not pose any safety risks due to project design. The proposed project would not substantially increase hazards in or around the project area there is no impact. d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact: This project would not result in inadequate emergency access. Emergency access to the site would be via S Roeben Street and S Shirk Road. During the first phase of construction, the access on S Shirk Road would not be built yet. However, a temporary emergency access will connect to W Whitendale Avenue. A network of local roads within the proposed project property provides full access to all buildings within the development. The Project would have no impact on emergency access.
1212
3-94
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project cause a substantial
adverse change in the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in Public Resources
Code section 21074 as either a site, feature,
place, cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American tribe, and
that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical Resources, or in a
local register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
   
ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant
to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the significance of the resource to
a California Native American tribe.
   
Environmental Setting
The Project area is in the Southern Valley Yokuts ethnographic territory of the San Joaquin Valley. The Yokuts are a sub-group of the Penutian language that covers much of coastal and central California and Oregon. The Yokuts were generally divided into three major groups, the Northern Valley Yokuts, the Southern Valley Yokuts, and the Foothill Yokuts. The Project area is likely within the Telamni Yokuts territory. The main village for this area was Waitatshuulul, which was approximately 3 miles east of the Project site along Packwood Creek Primary Yokuts villages were typically located along lakeshores and major stream courses, with scattered secondary or temporary camps and settlements located near gathering areas in the foothills. Prior to Euro-American contact, the Yokuts were one of the densest populations of Native Americans in western North America due to the substantial natural resources surrounding Tulare Lake. According to the Native American Heritage Commission, eight Native American tribal groups can be associated with the Project area, including the Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians, the Dunlap Band of Mono Indians, the Tubatulabals of Kern Valley, the Wukasache Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band, the Kern Valley Indian Community, the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, the North Fork Mono Tribe and the Tule River Indian Tribe.

Cultural Resources Record Search
On May 20, 2022, Taylored Archaeology requested a cultural resource records search from the SSJVIC of the CHRIS at California State University in Bakersfield, California. The purpose of this request was 1213
3-95
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 to identify any prehistoric or historical resources on or near the Project site that had been previously recorded within the Project boundary and a 0.5-mile radius of the Project area and identify and review prior cultural resource investigations completed in or near the Project boundary. SSJVIC staff researched historical USGS topographic maps, reports of previous cultural resource investigations, archaeological site and survey base maps, cultural resource records (DPR forms) as well as listings of the Historic Properties Directory of the Office of Historic Preservation, General Land Office Maps, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, and the California Inventory of Historic Resources.

According to the SSJVIC records search, there has been two previous cultural resource investigations within the Project area. One is a literature review of the Project region and the second is a book on conflicts between Native Americans and California gold miners during the 1850s Gold Rush in Mariposa. Neither of these reports included archaeological surveys. There have been five cultural resource studies conducted within a 0.5-mile radius of the project. There have been no cultural resources were previously recorded within the Project area. or within the 0.5-mile radius.

Additionally, no recorded cultural resources are recorded within the Project There is two cultural resources within a 0.5-mile radius of the project site. Both are historic-era, rural, single-family residences. In addition to the SSJVIC research, Taylored Archaeology further reviewed the cultural resources 0.5-miles from the Project boundary. Using Google Earth aerial maps, one of the historic homes was determined to have been demolished in 2021.

Native American Consultation
The State requires lead agencies to consider the potential effects of proposed projects and consult with California Native American tribes during the local planning process for the purpose of protecting Traditional Tribal Cultural Resources through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Pursuant to PRC Section 21080.3.1, the lead agency shall begin consultation with the California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographical area of the proposed project. Such significant cultural resources are either sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a tribe which is either on or eligible for inclusion in the California Historic Register or local historic register, or, the lead agency, at its discretion, and support by substantial evidence, choose to treat the resources as a Tribal Cultural Resources (PRC Section 21074(a)(1-2)).

Additional information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per PRC Section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that PRC Section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.

The site is currently vacant and has been routinely disturbed as part of the agricultural operations. If any artifacts are inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities, existing federal, State, and local laws, and regulations as well as the mitigation measures will require construction activities to cease until such artifacts are properly examined and determined not to be of significance by a qualified cultural resource professional.

On May 20, 2022, Taylored Archaeology sent an email to the NAHC requesting a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search to identify places in or near the Project area that may be tribal cultural resources, including sacred sites or other resources of importance. The results of this search were negative.

However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area.
1214
3-96
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Following AB 52, Native American Tribes that could potentially be impacted by the Project were contacted. The Tribes that were formally noticed of this Project were the Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians, Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, Dunlap Band of Mono Indians, Tubatulabals of Kern Valley, Tule River Indian Tribe, Kern Valley Indian Community, North Fork Mono Tribe, and the Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe responded regarding their concerns. A representative of the Tribe stated “Due to Tribal history and knowledge of the project area, the Tribe has concerns and is requesting that an archaeological firm be hired to conduct a pre-construction survey, a records search with the NAHC and CHRIS center, and monitoring of any ground disturbing activities. We request to be put in contact with the archaeological firm hired so we can maintain updates about the project.” Regulatory Setting
Historical Resources
Historical resources are defined by CEQA as resources that are listed in or eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources, resources that are listed in a local historical resource register, or resources that are otherwise determined to be historical under California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 or California Code of Regulations Section 15064.5. Under these definitions Historical Resources can include archaeological resources, Tribal cultural resources, and Paleontological Resources.

Archaeological Resources
As stated above, archaeological resources may be considered historical resources. If they do not meet the qualifications under the California Public Resources Code 21084.1 or California Code of Regulations Section 15064.5, they are instead determined to be “unique” as defined by the CEQA Statute Section 21083.2. A unique archaeological resource is an artifact, object, or site that: (1) contains information (for which there is a demonstrable public interest) needed to answer important scientific research questions; (2) has a special and particular quality, such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type; or (3) is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person.

Tribal Cultural Resource (TCR)
Tribal Cultural Resources can include site features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, or objects, which are of cultural value to a Tribe. It is either listed on or eligible for the CA Historic Register or a local historic register or determined by the lead agency to be treated as TCR.

Paleontological Resources
For the purposes of this section, “paleontological resources” refers to the fossilized plant and animal remains of prehistoric species. Paleontological Resources are a limited scientific and educational resource and are valued for the information they yield about the history of the earth and its ecology.

Fossilized remains, such as bones, teeth, shells, and leaves, are found in geologic deposits (i.e., rock formations). Paleontological resources generally include the geologic formations and localities in which the fossils are collected.

Native American Reserve (NAR)
This designation recognizes tribal trust and reservation lands managed by a Native American Tribe under the United States Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Indian Affairs over which the County 1215
3-97
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 has no land use jurisdiction. The County encourages adoption of tribal management plans for these areas that consider compatibility and impacts upon adjacent area facilities and plans.

National Historic Preservation Act
The National Historic Preservation Act was adopted in 1966 to preserve historic and archeological sites in the United States. The Act created the National Register of Historic Places, the list of National Historic Landmarks, and the State Historic Preservation offices.

California Historic Register
The California Historic Register was developed as a program to identify, evaluate, register, and protect Historical Resources in California. Historical resources may include, but are not limited to, “any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically or archaeologically significant” (PRC §5020.1[j]). In addition, a resource included in a local register of historical resources or identified as significant in a local survey conducted in accordance with the state guidelines are also considered historic resources under California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1.

According to CEQA guidelines §15064.5 (a)(3), criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources includes the following:
• Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage.
• Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. • Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. • Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

According to CEQA guidelines §21074 (a)(1), criteria for tribal cultural resources includes the following:
• Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following:
o Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources.
o Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1.

Protection of cultural resources within California is additionally regulated by PRC §5097.5, which prohibits destruction, defacing, or removal of any historic or prehistoric cultural features on land under the jurisdiction of State or local authorities.

City of Visalia General Plan
The 2030 General Plan includes the policies related to tribal resources that correlate to the proposed project:

OSC-P-42: Establish requirements to avoid potential impacts to sites suspected of being archeologically, paleontologically, or historically significant or of concern, by:
1216
3-98
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 • Requiring a records review for development proposed in areas that are considered archaeologically or paleontologically sensitive;
• Determining the potential effects of development and construction on archaeological or paleontological resources (as required by CEQA);
• Requiring pre-construction surveys and monitoring during any ground disturbance for all development in areas of historical and archaeological sensitivity (defined as areas identified according to the National Historic Preservation Act as part of the Section 106 process); and • Implementing appropriate measures to avoid the identified impacts, as conditions of project approval.

Discussion
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation: The project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources. Based on the results of the records search, no previously recorded tribal cultural resources are located within the project site. Although no cultural resources were identified, the presence of remains or unanticipated cultural resources under the ground surface is possible. Therefore, Tribes that can potentially be impacted were consulted. The Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe responded regarding their concerns. A representative of the Tribe stated “Due to Tribal history and knowledge of the project area, the Tribe has concerns and is requesting that an archaeological firm be hired to conduct a pre-construction survey, a records search with the NAHC and CHRIS center, and monitoring of any ground disturbing activities. We request to be put in contact with the archaeological firm hired so we can maintain updates about the project.” Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1, CUL-2, CUL-3, and CUL-4 will ensure that impacts to this checklist item will be less than significant with mitigation incorporation. ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation: The lead agency has not determined there to be any known tribal cultural resources located within the project area. Additionally, there are not believed to be any paleontological resources or human remains buried within the project area’s vicinity. However, if resources were found to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resources to a California Native American Tribe. Implementation of Mitigation 1217
3-99
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 will ensure that any impacts resulting from project implementation remain less than significant with mitigation incorporation.

Mitigation Measures for Impacts to Cultural Resources:

Mitigation Measure CUL-1: If previously unknown resources are encountered before or during grading activities, construction shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified historical resources specialist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified historical resources specialist shall make recommendations to the City on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance.

If the resources are determined to be unique historical resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, measures shall be identified by the monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any historical artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be provided to a City‐approved institution or person who is capable of providing long‐term preservation to allow future scientific study.

Mitigation Measure CUL-2: In the event that human remains are unearthed during excavation and grading activities of any future development project, all activity shall cease immediately. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(a). If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner shall within 24 hours notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall then contact the most likely descendent of the deceased Native American, who shall then serve as the consultant on how to proceed with the remains. Pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b), upon the discovery of Native American remains, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. The landowner shall discuss and confer with the descendants all reasonable options regarding the descendants' preferences for treatment.

Mitigation Measure CUL-3: Prior to the start of construction, an archaeological firm shall be hired to conduct a pre-construction survey and submit a comprehensive report to the lead agency for review and approval prior to the start of construction. This report should document the findings of the preconstruction survey and include an assessment of the potential impacts of the proposed project on any identified archaeological resources. The plan should outline specific measures that will be implemented, such as construction phasing, site buffering, and artifact preservation, to protect the cultural resources, if any are discovered. To ensure compliance, the project approval should require that the archaeological survey report and the associated plan be prepared by a qualified archaeologist and that the survey and monitoring activities be conducted in accordance with relevant state and federal regulations and best practices. By requiring a comprehensive archaeological survey report and 1218
3-100
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 a detailed mitigation plan, the lead agency can ensure that any impacts to archaeological resources are avoided or minimized to the fullest extent possible.

Mitigation Measure CUL-4: During any ground disturbing activities, an archaeological firm shall be hired to monitor the Project Site. The monitoring should be conducted by a qualified archaeologist with experience in the region and in compliance with relevant state and federal regulations and best practices. The monitoring should include regular site inspections to identify any archaeological resources that may have been uncovered during ground-disturbing activities. If any resources are identified, the monitoring should also include documentation, mapping, and analysis of the resources, as well as the development of a mitigation plan to address any potential impacts to the resources. 1219
3-101
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or stormwater
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relation of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
   
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
   
c) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
   
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
   
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
   
Environmental Setting
Wastewater
Sewer services are provided to the site by the City of Visalia. The City owns a Water Conservation Plant (WCP) to treat wastewater. Presently, the WCP’s permitted capacity as established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is 20 million gallons per day (mgd). A planned upgrade will increase the capacity to 26 mgd. The WCP has a daily flow of 13 mgd. The City of Visalia operates a sewer system divided into eight service areas. The system currently has over 468 miles of sewer pipe.

Solid Waste
The City of Visalia provides residential waste pickup but has contracts with companies for other aspects. Sunset Waste Systems provides waste collection for commercial uses and processes recyclable material. Tulare County Compost and Biomass processes green waste.

The Tulare County Resource Management Agency manages some solid waste disposal. Programs include household hazardous waste disposal, electronics recycling, tire recovery, yard waste recycling, metal recycling and appliance recovery programs. The county landfills approximately 300,000 tons of waste per year, which is equivalent to about 5 pounds per person per day or one ton per county 1220
3-102
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 resident per year. The County operates three disposal sites: the Visalia Disposal Site, northwest of Visalia; the Woodville Disposal Site, southeast of Tulare; and the Teapot Dome Disposal Site, southwest of Porterville. These sites have a remaining capacity of 24,258,052 cubic yards, with a total capacity of 37,101,523 cubic yards.

Water
The California Water Service Company (Cal Water) distribute groundwater supply. Cal Water’s Visalia District supply wells extract groundwater from the Kaweah Groundwater Subbasin. The Cal Water system includes 75 operational groundwater wells, about one third of which have auxiliary power for backup. There are 519 miles of main pipeline in the system. The system includes two elevated 300,000-gallon storage tanks, an ion exchange treatment plant, four granular activated carbon filter plants and one nitrate blending facility.

The system currently has the capacity to pump 100,829 acre-feet per year (afy), all from groundwater.

This will be able to supply a growing population, as in 2010, 31,762 AF was needed. By 2030, the city is expected to use 43,002 afy.

Regulatory Setting
CalRecycle
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Natural Resources – Division 7 contains all current CalRecycle regulations regarding nonhazardous waste management in the state. These regulations include standards for the handling of solid waste, standards for the handling of compostable materials, design standards for disposal facilities, and disposal standards for specific types of waste.

Central Valley RWQCB
The Central Valley RWQCB requires a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for projects disturbing more than one acre of total land area. Because the project is greater than one acre, a SWPPP to manage stormwater generated during project construction will be required.

The Central Valley RWQCB regulates Wastewater Discharges to Land by establishing thresholds for discharged pollutants and implementing monitoring programs to evaluate program compliance. This program regulates approximately 1500 dischargers in the region.

The Central Valley RWQCB is also responsible for implementing the federal program, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The NPDES Program is the federal permitting program that regulates discharges of pollutants to surface waters of the U.S. Under this program, a NPDES permit is required to discharge pollutants into Waters of the U.S. There are 350 permitted facilities within the Central Valley Region.

Cal Water Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) – Visalia District The UWMP describes the Visalia District service area, system demand and usage, available water resources, reliability of the water supply, and contingency planning for water shortage. It also contains a conservation section in compliance with SB X7-7 describing water usage reduction targets and implementation measures. The UWMP identifies five core programs for water conservation in the District that involve promotion of high-efficiency fixtures in residential settings, promotion of highefficiency irrigation systems, and public information and education. 1221
3-103
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 City of Visalia General Plan
The 2030 General Plan includes the objectives and policies related to utilities and service systemsthat correlate to the proposed project:
• PSCU-O-14: Provide for long-range community water needs by adopting best management practices for water use, conservation, groundwater recharge and wastewater and stormwater management.
• PSCU-P-46: Adopt and implement a Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance for new and/or refurbished development that exceeds mandated sizes, and ensure that all new City parks, streetscapes, and landscaped areas conform to the Ordinance’s requirements. The Ordinance should include provisions to optimize outdoor water use by:
o Promoting appropriate use of plants and landscaping;
o Establishing limitations on use of turf including size of turf areas and use of cool-season turf such as Fescue grasses, with exceptions for specified uses (e.g., recreation playing fields, golf courses, and parks);
o Establishing water budgets and penalties for exceeding them; o Requiring automatic irrigation systems and schedules, including controllers that incorporate weather-based or other self-adjusting technology; o Promoting the use of recycled water; and
o Minimizing overspray and runoff.
• PSCU-P-59: Require new developments to incorporate floodwater detention basins into project designs where consistent with the Stormwater Master Plan and the Groundwater Recharge Plan. • PSCU-P-60: Control urban and stormwater runoff and point and non-point discharge of pollutants.

As part of the City’s Stormwater Management Program, adopt and implement a Stormwater Management Ordinance to minimize stormwater runoff rates and volumes, control water pollution, and maximize groundwater recharge. New development will be required to include Low Impact Development features that reduce impermeable surface areas and increase infiltration.

Such features may include, but are not limited to:
o Canopy trees or shrubs to absorb rainwater;
o Grading that lengthens flow paths over permeable surfaces and increases runoff travel time to reduce the peak hour flow rate;
o Partially removing curbs and gutters from parking areas where appropriate to allow stormwater sheet flow into vegetated areas;
o Use of permeable paving in parking lots and other areas characterized by significant impervious surfaces;
o On-site stormwater detention, use of bioswales and bioretention basins to facilitate infiltration; and
o Integrated or subsurface water retention facilities to capture rainwater for use in landscape irrigation and other non-potable uses.
1222
3-104
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Discussion
a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project would result in new water services. However, the proposed site has no change of use proposal. Visalia’s current system for water and wastewater have the capacity to manage the projected growth expected in the General Plan. To compensate for these services, new development will be required to pay impact fees. It is not anticipated that implementation of the proposed project would result in increased demand for any utility services beyond the planned conditions. There is a less than significant impact. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less than Significant Impact: Cal Water will provide water services. The City’s water supply source is comprised of 75 operational groundwater wells. The system currently has the capacity to pump 100,829 acre-feet per year (afy), all from groundwater. This will be able to supply a growing population, as in 2010, 31,762 AF was needed. By 2030, the city is expected to use 43,002 afy. Using average per-person water use in Visalia (183 gallons; 2020 Urban Water Management Plan) and the average household size in Visalia (2.99 persons; US Census Bureau), water demand for the proposed 136-unit residential development is estimated to be approximately 74,415 gallons of water daily, or about 83-acre feet per year. With the system capacity at 100,829 afy, there will be enough water supply for the proposed project. The project does not propose any new or expanded uses against the Visalia General Plan. The available water supply is expected to supply the projected population. In 2030, the projected demand is expected to 35,276 AF of groundwater, in 2035, there is expected to be 38,310 AF of groundwater, and in 2040 there is expected to be 41,258 AF of groundwater. To compensate for these services, new development will be required to pay impact fees for new water services, along with the reduced water use implementations from the polices set forth in the Visalia General Plan. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less than Significant Impact: The project does not propose any new or expanded uses and is therefore not anticipated to result in increased demand for wastewater treatment services beyond existing conditions in the Visalia General Plan. Additionally, the City’s MEIR has evaluated the site’s current and future wastewater service demand. The current capacity of the wastewater system is approximately 20 mgd. It currently receives 13 mgd, leaving an available 7 mgd. In addition, a future upgrade plans to increase the capacity to 26 mgd. Based on the average per-acre daily wastewater use (1,300 gallons; City of Visalia General Plan), the 69.35-acre project would produce approximately 90,155 mgd of wastewater.
1223
3-105
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Because the City’s sewer system has the capacity to meet the project site’s expected demand for wastewater treatment, and it is not anticipated that the project will increase the site’s demand for wastewater treatment, it can be inferred that the existing wastewater treatment system has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project. There is a less than significant impact. d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? No Impact: Sunset Waste Systems provides solid waste services to the proposed project site. The project does not propose any new or expanded uses and is therefore not anticipated to result in increased generation of solid waste beyond existing conditions. Additionally, the disposal sites are at less than half capacity. Because the City’s existing infrastructure has the capacity to accommodate the solid waste currently planned in the General Plan for expanded population, it can be inferred that the existing solid waste infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project. The project would not generate solid waste more than State or Local Standards and there is no impact. e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No Impact: This proposed project conforms to all applicable statutes and regulations related to solid waste disposal. The proposed project will comply with the adopted policies related to solid waste, and will comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations pertaining to disposal of solid waste, including recycling. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact on solid waste regulations.
1224
3-106
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 XX. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?    
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled
spread of a wildfire?
   
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
   
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
   
Environmental Setting
There are no State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) within the vicinity of the project site, and the project site is not categorized as a “Very High” Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) by CalFire. This CEQA topic only applies to areas within an SRA or a Very High FHSZ.

Regulatory Setting
Fire Hazard Severity Zones: geographical areas designated pursuant to California Public Resources Codes Sections 4201 through 4204 and classified as Very High, High, or Moderate in State Responsibility Areas or as Local Agency Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones designated pursuant to California Government Code, Sections 51175 through 51189.

Discussion
a) Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact: The project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The Visalia Fire Department will review the project to ensure the project does not impair emergency response or emergency evacuation. Additionally, the proposed project site is not located within an SRA or a Very High FHSZ. There is no impact. 1225
3-107
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, would the project exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
No Impact: The project is located on a flat area of agricultural and urban land which is considered to be at little risk of fire. Additionally, the proposed project site is not located within an SRA or a Very High FHSZ. There is no impact.
c) Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Less than Significant Impact: The construction of the project involves adding new local residential streets, and new and relocated utilities. Utilities such as emergency water sources and power lines would be included as part of the proposed development, however all improvements would be subject to City standards and Fire Chief approval. The proposed project would not exacerbate fire risk and the impact would be less than significant.
d) Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire instability, or drainage changes? No Impact: The project site is not located in an area designated as a Fire Hazard Severity Zone and lands associated with the Project site are relatively flat. Therefore, the project would not be susceptible to downslope or downstream flooding or landslides as a result of post-fire instability or drainage changes. There is no impact.
1226
3-108
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Does the project have the potential
substantially to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
   
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
   
c) Does the project have environmental effects,
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
   
Discussion
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation: This initial study/mitigated negative declaration found the project could have significant impacts on biological resources, hydrology and water quality, historical, and Tribal cultural resources. However, implementation of the identified mitigation measures for each respective section would ensure that impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporation.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
1227
3-109
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Less than Significant Impact: CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h) states that a Lead Agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact of a project is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. The assessment of the significance of the cumulative effects of a project must, therefore, be conducted in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects. Due to the nature of the project and consistency with environmental policies, incremental contributions to impacts are considered less than cumulatively considerable. The proposed project would not contribute substantially to adverse cumulative conditions, or create any substantial indirect impacts (i.e., increase in population could lead to an increased need for housing, increase in traffic, air pollutants, etc). Impacts would be less than significant.
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant Impact: The analyses of environmental issues contained in this Initial Study indicate that the project is not expected to have substantial impact on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the project design to reduce all potentially significant impacts to less than significant, which results in a less than significant impact to this checklist item.
1228
3-110
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023

3.6 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
As required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, subd. (a)(1), a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for the project in order to monitor the implementation of the mitigation measures that have been adopted for the project. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been created based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Barr-Wood Subdivision Project in the City of Visalia.

The first column of the table identifies the mitigation measure. The second column names the party responsible for carrying out the required action. The third column, “Timing of Mitigation Measure” identifies the time the mitigation measure should be initiated. The fourth column, “Responsible Party for Monitoring,” names the party ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented. The last column will be used by the City to ensure that the individual mitigation measures have been monitored.

Plan checking and verification of mitigation compliance shall be the responsibility of the City of Visalia. 1229
3-111
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Mitigation Measure
Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: If previously unknown resources are encountered before or during grading activities, construction shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified historical resources specialist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified historical resources specialist shall make recommendations to the City on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and the City’s Historic
Preservation Ordinance.

Project Applicant Ongoing during
construction
Contractor/
Lead Agency
Mitigation Measure CUL-2: In the event that human remains are unearthed during excavation and grading activities of any future development project, all activity shall cease immediately.

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(a). If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner shall within 24 hours notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall then contact the most likely descendent of the deceased Native American, who shall then serve as the consultant on how to proceed with the remains. Pursuant to PRC Section
5097.98(b), upon the discovery of Native American remains, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains.

The landowner shall discuss and confer with the descendants all reasonable options regarding the descendants' preferences for treatment.

Project Applicant Ongoing during
construction
Contractor/
Lead Agency
1230
3-112
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Mitigation Measure
Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification
Mitigation Measure CUL-3: Prior to the start of construction, an archaeological firm shall be hired to conduct a pre-construction survey and submit a comprehensive report to the lead agency for review and approval prior to the start of construction. This report should document the findings of the pre-construction survey and include an assessment of the potential impacts of the proposed project on any identified archaeological resources. The plan should outline specific measures that will be implemented, such as construction phasing, site buffering, and artifact preservation, to protect the cultural resources, if any are discovered. To ensure compliance, the project approval should require that the archaeological survey report and the associated plan be prepared by a qualified archaeologist and that the survey and monitoring activities be conducted in accordance with relevant state and federal regulations and best practices. By requiring a
comprehensive archaeological survey report and a detailed mitigation plan, the lead agency can ensure that any impacts to archaeological resources are avoided or minimized to the fullest extent possible.

Project Applicant Prior to the Start
of Construction
Contractor/
Lead Agency
Mitigation Measure CUL-4: During any ground disturbing
activities, an archaeological firm shall be hired to monitor the Project Site. The monitoring should be conducted by a qualified archaeologist with experience in the region and in compliance with relevant state and federal regulations and best practices.

The monitoring should include regular site inspections to identify any archaeological resources that may have been uncovered during ground-disturbing activities. If any resources are identified, the monitoring should also include documentation, mapping, and analysis of the resources, as well as the
development of a mitigation plan to address any potential impacts to the resources.

Project Applicant Ongoing during
construction
Contractor/
Lead Agency
Mitigation Measure HYD-1: Prior to the issuance of any
construction/grading permit and/or the commencement of any clearing, grading, or excavation, the Applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) for discharge from the Project site to the California SWRCB Storm Water Permit Unit.
• Prior to issuance of grading permits for Phase 1 the Applicant shall submit a copy of the NOI to the City.
• The City shall review noticing documentation prior to approval of the grading permit. City monitoring staff will inspect the site during construction for compliance.

Project Applicant Prior to the Start
of Construction
Contractor/
Lead Agency
1231
3-113
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Mitigation Measure
Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification
Mitigation Measure HYD-2: The Applicant shall require the building contractor to prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City 45 days prior to the start of work for approval. The contractor is responsible for understanding the State General Permit and instituting the SWPPP during construction. A SWPPP for site construction shall be developed prior to the initiation of grading and implemented for all construction activity on the Project site in excess of one (1) acre, or where the area of disturbance is less than one acre but is part of the Project’s plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres. The SWPPP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include specific BMPs to control the discharge of material from the site. The following BMP methods shall include, but would not be limited to:
• Dust control measures will be implemented to ensure success of all onsite activities to
control fugitive dust;
• A routine monitoring plan will be implemented to ensure success of all onsite erosion and sedimentation control measures; • Provisional detention basins, straw bales, erosion control blankets, mulching, silt fencing,
sand bagging, and soil stabilizers will be used;
• Soil stockpiles and graded slopes will be covered after two weeks of inactivity and 24
hours prior to and during extreme weather conditions; and, • BMPs will be strictly followed to prevent spills and discharges of pollutants onsite,
such as material storage, trash disposal, construction entrances, etc.

Project Applicant
45 Days Prior to
the Start of
Construction
Contractor/
Lead Agency
1232
3-114
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 Mitigation Measure
Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification
Mitigation Measure HYD-3: A Development Maintenance
Manual for the Project shall include comprehensive procedures for maintenance and operations of any stormwater facilities to ensure long-term operation and maintenance of postconstruction stormwater controls. The maintenance manual shall require that stormwater BMP devices be inspected, cleaned, and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s maintenance conditions. The manual shallrequire that devices be cleaned prior to the onset of the rainy season (i.e., mid-October) and immediately after the end of the rainy season (i.e., mid-May). The manual shall also require that all devices be checked after major storm events. The Development Maintenance Manual shall
include the following:
• Runoff shall be directed away from trash and loading dock areas;
• Bins shall be lined or otherwise constructed to reduce leaking of liquid wastes;
• Trash and loading dock areas shall be screened or walled to minimize offsite transport of trash; and
• Impervious berms, trench catch basin, drop inlets, or overflow containment structures nearby docks and trash areas shall be installed to minimize the potential for leaks, spills or wash down water to enter the drainage system.

Project Applicant Prior to the Start
of Construction
Contractor/
Lead Agency
1233
3-115
Barr-Wood Subdivision
DRAFT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023

3.7 Supporting Information and Sources

1. AB 3098 List

2. EMFAC2014

3. Tulare County General Plan

4. City of Visalia General Plan

5. City of Visalia General Plan MEIR

6. City of Visalia Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan

7. City of Visalia Zoning Ordinance

8. Engineering Standards, City of Visalia

9. SJVAPCD Regulations and Guidelines

10. FEMA Flood Maps

11. California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook

12. 2019 California Environmental Quality Act CEQA Guidelines

13. California Building Code

14. California Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP)

15. “Construction Noise Handbook.” U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration.

16. Government Code Section 65962.5

17. California Environmental Protection Agency (CEPA) San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Mitigation Measures (http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/Mitigation-Measures.pdf

18. Southern California Edison 2019 Power Content Label

19. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Federal Transit Administration, September 2018.

20. 2020 U.S. Census

21. California Department of Transportation Scenic Roadways

22. EPA, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

23. 2020 Cal Water Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) – Visalia District

24. State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research

25. Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment - Consuelo Y. Sauls, Taylored Archaeology

26. Biological Resource Assessment – Soar Environmental Consulting 1234
Section 4
List of Preparers
1235
4-1
Barr-Wood Subdivision
FINAL Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration April 2023 City of Visalia
315 E Acequia Ave
Visalia, CA 93291
SECTION 4
List of Preparers
Project Title: Barr-Wood Subdivision
List of Preparers
4-Creeks Inc.
• David Duda, AICP, GISP
• Steve Macias, Civil Engineer
• Molly McDonnel, Associate Planner
• Lisa M. Wallis-Dutra, Sr. Traffic Engineer
Persons and Agencies Consulted
The following individuals and agencies contributed to this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration:

City of Visalia
• Cristobal Carrillo, Planning Division
• Brandon Smith, Planning Division
• Leslie Blair, Senior Civil Engineer
• Adrian Rubalcaba, Associate Engineer
Taylored Archaeology
• Consuelo Y. Sauls, Archaeologist
California Historic Resources Information System
• Celeste Thomson, Coordinator
SOAR Environmental Consulting
• Ben Arax, Biologist
1236
Appendix A
CalEEMod Report
1237
Part 1
Projected Emissions from CalEEMod
1238
Barr-Wood Subdivision
Tulare County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot Acerage Established
Construction Phase -
Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT -
Grading -
Fleet Mix - District Accepted Fleet Mix for Residential Projects Woodstoves -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 136.00 Dwelling Unit 69.35 244,800.00 389

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
7 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 51

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2030
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1239

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02
tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.51
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.05 0.22
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.17
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 8.0000e-004
tblFleetMix LHD2 6.6100e-003 1.0000e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 2.5000e-003
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.06
tblFleetMix MH 2.8150e-003 3.0000e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 7.4000e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 6.1700e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 1.2780e-003 1.2000e-003
tblFleetMix UBUS 4.6500e-004 4.4000e-003
tblLandUse LotAcreage 44.16 69.35
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1240

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.3378 3.2874 2.9256 6.1100e0030.9379 0.1426 1.0805 0.4134 0.1320 0.5454 0.0000 536.9894 536.9894 0.1500 3.2600e003541.7105 2024 0.2155 1.8635 2.3049 4.3500e0030.0641 0.0812 0.1453 0.0174 0.0764 0.0937 0.0000 381.3573 381.3573 0.0732 6.8600e003385.2317 2025 0.1995 1.7273 2.2724 4.3100e0030.0639 0.0697 0.1335 0.0173 0.0655 0.0828 0.0000 378.3617 378.3617 0.0724 6.6300e003382.1490 2026 0.1980 1.7254 2.2622 4.2900e0030.0639 0.0696 0.1335 0.0173 0.0655 0.0828 0.0000 376.6949 376.6949 0.0723 6.4500e003380.4235 2027 0.1843 1.6200 2.1993 4.0700e0030.0556 0.0670 0.1226 0.0150 0.0629 0.0779 0.0000 357.4469 357.4469 0.0744 5.2400e003360.8672 2028 2.3192 0.1725 0.2979 4.9000e0044.7800e0038.2300e0030.0130 1.2700e0037.7200e0038.9900e0030.0000 43.0118 43.0118 0.0103 9.0000e00543.2953 Maximum 2.3192 3.2874 2.9256 6.1100e0030.9379 0.1426 1.0805 0.4134 0.1320 0.5454 0.0000 536.9894 536.9894 0.1500 6.8600e003541.7105 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1241

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.3378 3.2874 2.9256 6.1100e0030.9379 0.1426 1.0805 0.4134 0.1320 0.5454 0.0000 536.9888 536.9888 0.1500 3.2600e003541.7099 2024 0.2155 1.8635 2.3049 4.3500e0030.0641 0.0812 0.1453 0.0174 0.0764 0.0937 0.0000 381.3569 381.3569 0.0732 6.8600e003385.2314 2025 0.1995 1.7273 2.2724 4.3100e0030.0639 0.0697 0.1335 0.0173 0.0655 0.0828 0.0000 378.3614 378.3614 0.0724 6.6300e003382.1486 2026 0.1980 1.7254 2.2622 4.2900e0030.0639 0.0696 0.1335 0.0173 0.0655 0.0828 0.0000 376.6945 376.6945 0.0723 6.4500e003380.4232 2027 0.1843 1.6200 2.1993 4.0700e0030.0556 0.0670 0.1226 0.0150 0.0629 0.0779 0.0000 357.4465 357.4465 0.0744 5.2400e003360.8668 2028 2.3192 0.1725 0.2979 4.9000e0044.7800e0038.2300e0030.0130 1.2700e0037.7200e0038.9900e0030.0000 43.0117 43.0117 0.0103 9.0000e00543.2952 Maximum 2.3192 3.2874 2.9256 6.1100e0030.9379 0.1426 1.0805 0.4134 0.1320 0.5454 0.0000 536.9888 536.9888 0.1500 6.8600e003541.7099 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 1.0696 1.0696
2 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 1.2339 1.2339
3 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.7667 0.7667
4 10-1-2023 12-31-2023 0.5577 0.5577
5 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 0.5167 0.5167
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1242
6 4-1-2024 6-30-2024 0.5154 0.5154
7 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 0.5211 0.5211
8 10-1-2024 12-31-2024 0.5224 0.5224
9 1-1-2025 3-31-2025 0.4755 0.4755
10 4-1-2025 6-30-2025 0.4795 0.4795
11 7-1-2025 9-30-2025 0.4847 0.4847
12 10-1-2025 12-31-2025 0.4860 0.4860
13 1-1-2026 3-31-2026 0.4746 0.4746
14 4-1-2026 6-30-2026 0.4786 0.4786
15 7-1-2026 9-30-2026 0.4839 0.4839
16 10-1-2026 12-31-2026 0.4852 0.4852
17 1-1-2027 3-31-2027 0.4738 0.4738
18 4-1-2027 6-30-2027 0.4778 0.4778
19 7-1-2027 9-30-2027 0.4831 0.4831
20 10-1-2027 12-31-2027 0.3678 0.3678
21 1-1-2028 3-31-2028 1.2393 1.2393
22 4-1-2028 6-30-2028 1.2526 1.2526
Highest 1.2526 1.2526
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1243

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 9.6109 0.1577 10.2823 0.0150 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.7000e0030.0111 176.9179 Energy 0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 363.9391 363.9391 0.0195 5.1200e003365.9517 Mobile 0.2770 0.5508 3.4586 0.0105 1.3295 7.1700e0031.3367 0.3549 6.6900e0030.3616 0.0000 1,037.970 0 1,037.970
0 0.0520 0.0449 1,052.648
6 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.4269 0.0000 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.8112 11.9706 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935 Total 9.9053 0.8574 13.8043 0.0265 1.3295 1.2964 2.6259 0.3549 1.2959 1.6509 144.2298 1,474.445 3 1,618.675
1 2.0439 0.0680 1,690.038
0 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1244

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 9.6109 0.1577 10.2823 0.0150 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.7000e0030.0111 176.9179 Energy 0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 363.9391 363.9391 0.0195 5.1200e003365.9517 Mobile 0.2663 0.4632 2.9075 8.2300e0031.0306 5.7200e0031.0363 0.2751 5.3400e0030.2805 0.0000 811.8840 811.8840 0.0442 0.0373 824.1087 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.4269 0.0000 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.8112 11.9706 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935 Total 9.8945 0.7699 13.2531 0.0242 1.0306 1.2950 2.3256 0.2751 1.2946 1.5697 144.2298 1,248.359 4 1,392.589
1 2.0360 0.0604 1,461.498
1 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2023 2/24/2023 5 40 2 Grading Grading 2/25/2023 7/28/2023 5 110
3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/29/2023 10/29/2027 5 1110 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.11 10.21 3.99 8.64 22.48 0.11 11.44 22.49 0.10 4.92 0.00 15.33 13.97 0.38 11.15 13.52 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1245
4 Paving Paving 10/30/2027 2/11/2028 5 75
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/12/2028 5/26/2028 5 75 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 495,720; Residential Outdoor: 165,240; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 60
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 330
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1246

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 49.00 15.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1247

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2600e0038.8000e0049.8200e0032.0000e0052.8700e0031.0000e0052.8800e0037.6000e0041.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.3060 2.3060 8.0000e0057.0000e0052.3299 Total 1.2600e0038.8000e0049.8200e0032.0000e0052.8700e0031.0000e0052.8800e0037.6000e0041.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.3060 2.3060 8.0000e0057.0000e0052.3299 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.3931 0.0000 0.3931 0.2021 0.0000 0.2021 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0532 0.5505 0.3649 7.6000e0040.0253 0.0253 0.0233 0.0233 0.0000 66.9013 66.9013 0.0216 0.0000 67.4422 Total 0.0532 0.5505 0.3649 7.6000e0040.3931 0.0253 0.4185 0.2021 0.0233 0.2253 0.0000 66.9013 66.9013 0.0216 0.0000 67.4422 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1248

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.5062 0.0000 0.5062 0.2010 0.0000 0.2010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1827 1.8984 1.5428 3.4100e0030.0784 0.0784 0.0721 0.0721 0.0000 299.9437 299.9437 0.0970 0.0000 302.3688 Total 0.1827 1.8984 1.5428 3.4100e0030.5062 0.0784 0.5846 0.2010 0.0721 0.2730 0.0000 299.9437 299.9437 0.0970 0.0000 302.3688 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1249

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.8400e0032.7000e0030.0300 8.0000e0058.7600e0035.0000e0058.8100e0032.3300e0034.0000e0052.3700e0030.0000 7.0461 7.0461 2.4000e0042.3000e0047.1192 Total 3.8400e0032.7000e0030.0300 8.0000e0058.7600e0035.0000e0058.8100e0032.3300e0034.0000e0052.3700e0030.0000 7.0461 7.0461 2.4000e0042.3000e0047.1192 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.5062 0.0000 0.5062 0.2010 0.0000 0.2010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1827 1.8984 1.5428 3.4100e0030.0784 0.0784 0.0721 0.0721 0.0000 299.9433 299.9433 0.0970 0.0000 302.3685 Total 0.1827 1.8984 1.5428 3.4100e0030.5062 0.0784 0.5846 0.2010 0.0721 0.2730 0.0000 299.9433 299.9433 0.0970 0.0000 302.3685 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1250

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0865 0.7912 0.8934 1.4800e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 127.4926 127.4926 0.0303 0.0000 128.2508 Total 0.0865 0.7912 0.8934 1.4800e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 127.4926 127.4926 0.0303 0.0000 128.2508 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1251

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.3000e0040.0372 0.0112 1.7000e0045.4500e0032.4000e0045.6900e0031.5800e0032.3000e0041.8000e0030.0000 16.0366 16.0366 7.0000e0052.4100e00316.7572 Worker 9.4200e0036.6100e0030.0735 1.9000e0040.0215 1.1000e0040.0216 5.7100e0031.0000e0045.8100e0030.0000 17.2630 17.2630 5.9000e0045.5000e00417.4421 Total 0.0104 0.0438 0.0847 3.6000e0040.0269 3.5000e0040.0273 7.2900e0033.3000e0047.6100e0030.0000 33.2996 33.2996 6.6000e0042.9600e00334.1993 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0865 0.7912 0.8934 1.4800e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 127.4925 127.4925 0.0303 0.0000 128.2507 Total 0.0865 0.7912 0.8934 1.4800e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 127.4925 127.4925 0.0303 0.0000 128.2507 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1252

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e0030.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e0030.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1253

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1500e0030.0885 0.0261 3.9000e0040.0130 5.7000e0040.0136 3.7600e0035.4000e0044.3000e0030.0000 37.6071 37.6071 1.7000e0045.6500e00339.2950 Worker 0.0206 0.0138 0.1609 4.3000e0040.0511 2.5000e0040.0514 0.0136 2.3000e0040.0138 0.0000 40.0278 40.0278 1.2500e0031.2100e00340.4189 Total 0.0227 0.1023 0.1870 8.2000e0040.0641 8.2000e0040.0649 0.0174 7.7000e0040.0181 0.0000 77.6350 77.6350 1.4200e0036.8600e00379.7139 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e0030.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e0030.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1254

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e0030.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e0030.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1255

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1000e0030.0878 0.0255 3.8000e0040.0129 5.7000e0040.0135 3.7400e0035.4000e0044.2800e0030.0000 36.8016 36.8016 1.6000e0045.5200e00338.4509 Worker 0.0189 0.0122 0.1479 4.1000e0040.0509 2.4000e0040.0512 0.0135 2.2000e0040.0138 0.0000 38.9052 38.9052 1.1200e0031.1100e00339.2646 Total 0.0210 0.1000 0.1734 7.9000e0040.0639 8.1000e0040.0647 0.0173 7.6000e0040.0180 0.0000 75.7068 75.7068 1.2800e0036.6300e00377.7155 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e0030.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e0030.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1256

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e0030.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e0030.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1257

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0500e0030.0872 0.0251 3.8000e0040.0129 5.6000e0040.0135 3.7400e0035.4000e0044.2800e0030.0000 36.1232 36.1232 1.6000e0045.4100e00337.7395 Worker 0.0175 0.0109 0.1380 4.0000e0040.0509 2.2000e0040.0512 0.0135 2.1000e0040.0138 0.0000 37.9168 37.9168 1.0100e0031.0400e00338.2505 Total 0.0196 0.0981 0.1631 7.8000e0040.0639 7.8000e0040.0647 0.0173 7.5000e0040.0180 0.0000 74.0400 74.0400 1.1700e0036.4500e00375.9900 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e0030.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e0030.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1258

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1477 1.3467 1.7371 2.9100e0030.0570 0.0570 0.0536 0.0536 0.0000 250.4730 250.4730 0.0589 0.0000 251.9450 Total 0.1477 1.3467 1.7371 2.9100e0030.0570 0.0570 0.0536 0.0536 0.0000 250.4730 250.4730 0.0589 0.0000 251.9450 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1259

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.6700e0030.0716 0.0205 3.1000e0040.0107 4.6000e0040.0112 3.1000e0034.4000e0043.5400e0030.0000 29.2923 29.2923 1.3000e0044.3800e00330.6012 Worker 0.0135 8.0800e0030.1069 3.2000e0040.0422 1.7000e0040.0423 0.0112 1.6000e0040.0114 0.0000 30.6816 30.6816 7.6000e0048.0000e00430.9403 Total 0.0152 0.0797 0.1273 6.3000e0040.0529 6.3000e0040.0535 0.0143 6.0000e0040.0149 0.0000 59.9738 59.9738 8.9000e0045.1800e00361.5414 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1477 1.3467 1.7371 2.9100e0030.0570 0.0570 0.0536 0.0536 0.0000 250.4727 250.4727 0.0589 0.0000 251.9447 Total 0.1477 1.3467 1.7371 2.9100e0030.0570 0.0570 0.0536 0.0536 0.0000 250.4727 250.4727 0.0589 0.0000 251.9447 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1260

3.5 Paving - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0206 0.1931 0.3280 5.1000e0049.4200e0039.4200e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 45.0433 45.0433 0.0146 0.0000 45.4075 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0206 0.1931 0.3280 5.1000e0049.4200e0039.4200e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 45.0433 45.0433 0.0146 0.0000 45.4075 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1261

3.5 Paving - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.6000e0045.2000e0046.8100e0032.0000e0052.6900e0031.0000e0052.7000e0037.1000e0041.0000e0057.2000e0040.0000 1.9567 1.9567 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.9732 Total 8.6000e0045.2000e0046.8100e0032.0000e0052.6900e0031.0000e0052.7000e0037.1000e0041.0000e0057.2000e0040.0000 1.9567 1.9567 5.0000e0055.0000e0051.9732 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0206 0.1931 0.3280 5.1000e0049.4200e0039.4200e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 45.0433 45.0433 0.0146 0.0000 45.4075 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0206 0.1931 0.3280 5.1000e0049.4200e0039.4200e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 45.0433 45.0433 0.0146 0.0000 45.4075 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1262

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0137 0.1287 0.2187 3.4000e0046.2800e0036.2800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 30.0289 30.0289 9.7100e0030.0000 30.2717 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0137 0.1287 0.2187 3.4000e0046.2800e0036.2800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 30.0289 30.0289 9.7100e0030.0000 30.2717 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1263

3.5 Paving - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.3000e0043.1000e0044.2800e0031.0000e0051.7900e0031.0000e0051.8000e0034.8000e0041.0000e0054.8000e0040.0000 1.2781 1.2781 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.2884 Total 5.3000e0043.1000e0044.2800e0031.0000e0051.7900e0031.0000e0051.8000e0034.8000e0041.0000e0054.8000e0040.0000 1.2781 1.2781 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.2884 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0137 0.1287 0.2187 3.4000e0046.2800e0036.2800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 30.0289 30.0289 9.7100e0030.0000 30.2717 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0137 0.1287 0.2187 3.4000e0046.2800e0036.2800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 30.0289 30.0289 9.7100e0030.0000 30.2717 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1264

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.9000e0045.2000e0047.1400e0032.0000e0052.9900e0031.0000e0053.0000e0037.9000e0041.0000e0058.0000e0040.0000 2.1301 2.1301 5.0000e0055.0000e0052.1474 Total 8.9000e0045.2000e0047.1400e0032.0000e0052.9900e0031.0000e0053.0000e0037.9000e0041.0000e0058.0000e0040.0000 2.1301 2.1301 5.0000e0055.0000e0052.1474 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 2.2977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.4100e0030.0430 0.0678 1.1000e0041.9300e0031.9300e0031.9300e0031.9300e0030.0000 9.5747 9.5747 5.2000e0040.0000 9.5878 Total 2.3041 0.0430 0.0678 1.1000e0041.9300e0031.9300e0031.9300e0031.9300e0030.0000 9.5747 9.5747 5.2000e0040.0000 9.5878 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1266

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Density
Increase Diversity
Improve Walkability Design
Improve Destination Accessibility
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1267
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2663 0.4632 2.9075 8.2300e0031.0306 5.7200e0031.0363 0.2751 5.3400e0030.2805 0.0000 811.8840 811.8840 0.0442 0.0373 824.1087 Unmitigated 0.2770 0.5508 3.4586 0.0105 1.3295 7.1700e0031.3367 0.3549 6.6900e0030.3616 0.0000 1,037.970 0 1,037.970
0 0.0520 0.0449 1,052.648
6 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 1,283.84 1,297.44 1162.80 3,575,540 2,771,614 Total 1,283.84 1,297.44 1,162.80 3,575,540 2,771,614
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 38.40 22.60 39.00 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.511000 0.223100 0.169000 0.059300 0.000800 0.001000 0.007400 0.017300 0.000000 0.004400 0.002500 0.001200 0.003000

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1268
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 191.4795 191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 191.4795 191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 172.4596 172.4596 3.3100e0033.1600e003173.4844 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 172.4596 172.4596 3.3100e0033.1600e003173.4844

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

3.23177e
+006

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1269

3.23177e
+006

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

1.0797e
+006
191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673
Total 191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1270

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 9.6109 0.1577 10.2823 0.0150 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.7000e0030.0111 176.9179 Unmitigated 9.6109 0.1577 10.2823 0.0150 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.7000e0030.0111 176.9179

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

1.0797e
+006
191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673
Total 191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1271

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.2298 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.9561 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 8.3949 0.1461 9.2751 0.0150 1.2716 1.2716 1.2716 1.2716 112.9917 58.9162 171.9079 1.1300e0030.0111 175.2291 Landscaping 0.0301 0.0116 1.0072 5.0000e0055.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e0030.0000 1.6495 1.6495 1.5700e0030.0000 1.6888 Total 9.6109 0.1577 10.2823 0.0150 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.7000e0030.0111 176.9179 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1272

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2298 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.9561 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 8.3949 0.1461 9.2751 0.0150 1.2716 1.2716 1.2716 1.2716 112.9917 58.9162 171.9079 1.1300e0030.0111 175.2291 Landscaping 0.0301 0.0116 1.0072 5.0000e0055.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e0030.0000 1.6495 1.6495 1.5700e0030.0000 1.6888 Total 9.6109 0.1577 10.2823 0.0150 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 1.2772 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.7000e0030.0111 176.9179 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1273
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Unmitigated 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

8.86095 /

5.58625

14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Total 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1274

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

8.86095 /

5.58625

14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Total 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263
Unmitigated 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 37 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1275

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
140.04 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263
Total 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
140.04 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263
Total 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 38 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1276

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 39 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 9:41 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision - Tulare County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1277
Part 2
2005 BAU from CalEEMod
1278
Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU
Tulare County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot Acerage Established
Construction Phase -
Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT -
Grading -
Fleet Mix -
Woodstoves -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Vehicle Trips -
Vehicle Emission Factors -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 136.00 Dwelling Unit 69.35 244,800.00 389

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
7 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 51

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2012
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1279
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater -
Solid Waste -

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 150.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 150.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 150.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 150.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 44.16 69.35
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1280

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2005 1.3594 9.6618 5.0153 0.0656 0.9379 0.5754 1.5133 0.4134 0.5749 0.9883 0.0000 641.5487 641.5487 0.1099 7.6600e003646.5791 2006 1.1453 6.0687 4.0026 0.0444 0.0636 0.4748 0.5385 0.0172 0.4738 0.4910 0.0000 445.9211 445.9211 0.0913 0.0143 452.4573 2007 1.1497 6.0920 4.0180 0.0446 0.0639 0.4766 0.5405 0.0173 0.4756 0.4929 0.0000 447.6361 447.6361 0.0917 0.0143 454.1975 2008 1.1541 6.1154 4.0334 0.0448 0.0641 0.4785 0.5426 0.0174 0.4775 0.4948 0.0000 449.3512 449.3512 0.0920 0.0144 455.9377 2009 1.0890 5.9890 3.7955 0.0431 0.0557 0.4544 0.5101 0.0151 0.4536 0.4686 0.0000 428.1256 428.1256 0.0871 0.0123 433.9616 2010 2.3717 0.6243 0.3891 5.2000e0044.8400e0030.0392 0.0441 1.2900e0030.0371 0.0384 0.0000 49.3211 49.3211 0.0125 4.7000e00449.7720 Maximum 2.3717 9.6618 5.0153 0.0656 0.9379 0.5754 1.5133 0.4134 0.5749 0.9883 0.0000 641.5487 641.5487 0.1099 0.0144 646.5791 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1281

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2005 1.3594 9.6618 5.0153 0.0656 0.9379 0.5754 1.5133 0.4134 0.5749 0.9883 0.0000 641.5480 641.5480 0.1099 7.6600e003646.5784 2006 1.1453 6.0687 4.0026 0.0444 0.0636 0.4748 0.5384 0.0172 0.4738 0.4910 0.0000 445.9207 445.9207 0.0913 0.0143 452.4569 2007 1.1497 6.0920 4.0180 0.0446 0.0639 0.4766 0.5405 0.0173 0.4756 0.4929 0.0000 447.6357 447.6357 0.0917 0.0143 454.1971 2008 1.1541 6.1153 4.0334 0.0448 0.0641 0.4785 0.5426 0.0174 0.4775 0.4948 0.0000 449.3508 449.3508 0.0920 0.0144 455.9373 2009 1.0890 5.9890 3.7955 0.0431 0.0557 0.4544 0.5101 0.0151 0.4536 0.4686 0.0000 428.1252 428.1252 0.0871 0.0123 433.9612 2010 2.3717 0.6243 0.3891 5.2000e0044.8400e0030.0392 0.0441 1.2900e0030.0371 0.0384 0.0000 49.3211 49.3211 0.0125 4.7000e00449.7720 Maximum 2.3717 9.6618 5.0153 0.0656 0.9379 0.5754 1.5133 0.4134 0.5749 0.9883 0.0000 641.5480 641.5480 0.1099 0.0144 646.5784 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2005 3-31-2005 3.0074 3.0074
2 4-1-2005 6-30-2005 3.7643 3.7643
3 7-1-2005 9-30-2005 2.4449 2.4449
4 10-1-2005 12-31-2005 1.8300 1.8300
5 1-1-2006 3-31-2006 1.7902 1.7902
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1282
6 4-1-2006 6-30-2006 1.7988 1.7988
7 7-1-2006 9-30-2006 1.8185 1.8185
8 10-1-2006 12-31-2006 1.8300 1.8300
9 1-1-2007 3-31-2007 1.7902 1.7902
10 4-1-2007 6-30-2007 1.7988 1.7988
11 7-1-2007 9-30-2007 1.8185 1.8185
12 10-1-2007 12-31-2007 1.8300 1.8300
13 1-1-2008 3-31-2008 1.8101 1.8101
14 4-1-2008 6-30-2008 1.7988 1.7988
15 7-1-2008 9-30-2008 1.8185 1.8185
16 10-1-2008 12-31-2008 1.8300 1.8300
17 1-1-2009 3-31-2009 1.7902 1.7902
18 4-1-2009 6-30-2009 1.7988 1.7988
19 7-1-2009 9-30-2009 1.8185 1.8185
20 10-1-2009 12-31-2009 1.6617 1.6617
21 1-1-2010 3-31-2010 1.6308 1.6308
22 4-1-2010 6-30-2010 1.3611 1.3611
Highest 3.7643 3.7643
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1283

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 9.6165 0.1587 10.3244 0.0150 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.9900e0030.0111 176.9252 Energy 0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 363.9391 363.9391 0.0195 5.1200e003365.9517 Mobile 1.6791 3.7858 17.4555 0.0183 1.3399 0.0717 1.4116 0.3594 0.0682 0.4276 0.0000 1,694.587 1 1,694.587
1 0.1784 0.1397 1,740.676
7 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.4269 0.0000 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.8112 11.9706 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935 Total 11.3130 4.0934 27.8434 0.0343 1.3399 1.3608 2.7007 0.3594 1.3573 1.7167 144.2298 2,131.062 4 2,275.292
2 2.1706 0.1628 2,378.073
4 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1284

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 9.6165 0.1587 10.3244 0.0150 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.9900e0030.0111 176.9252 Energy 0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 363.9391 363.9391 0.0195 5.1200e003365.9517 Mobile 1.6791 3.7858 17.4555 0.0183 1.3399 0.0717 1.4116 0.3594 0.0682 0.4276 0.0000 1,694.587 1 1,694.587
1 0.1784 0.1397 1,740.676
7 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.4269 0.0000 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.8112 11.9706 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935 Total 11.3130 4.0934 27.8434 0.0343 1.3399 1.3608 2.7007 0.3594 1.3573 1.7167 144.2298 2,131.062 4 2,275.292
2 2.1706 0.1628 2,378.073
4 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2005 2/25/2005 5 40 2 Grading Grading 2/26/2005 7/29/2005 5 110
3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/30/2005 10/30/2009 5 1110 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1285
4 Paving Paving 10/31/2009 2/12/2010 5 75
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/13/2010 5/28/2010 5 75 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 495,720; Residential Outdoor: 165,240; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 60
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 330
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1286

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 49.00 15.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1287

3.2 Site Preparation - 2005
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.3200e0038.0700e0030.0643 3.0000e0052.8700e0038.0000e0052.9400e0037.6000e0047.0000e0058.3000e0040.0000 3.2008 3.2008 5.1000e0044.0000e0043.3329 Total 6.3200e0038.0700e0030.0643 3.0000e0052.8700e0038.0000e0052.9400e0037.6000e0047.0000e0058.3000e0040.0000 3.2008 3.2008 5.1000e0044.0000e0043.3329 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.3931 0.0000 0.3931 0.2021 0.0000 0.2021 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1866 1.3985 0.5263 9.0000e0030.0863 0.0863 0.0863 0.0863 0.0000 80.0091 80.0091 0.0152 0.0000 80.3894 Total 0.1866 1.3985 0.5263 9.0000e0030.3931 0.0863 0.4794 0.2021 0.0863 0.2884 0.0000 80.0091 80.0091 0.0152 0.0000 80.3894 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1288

3.3 Grading - 2005
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.5062 0.0000 0.5062 0.2010 0.0000 0.2010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.6626 5.6630 2.5349 0.0376 0.2879 0.2879 0.2879 0.2879 0.0000 359.8995 359.8995 0.0540 0.0000 361.2488 Total 0.6626 5.6630 2.5349 0.0376 0.5062 0.2879 0.7941 0.2010 0.2879 0.4889 0.0000 359.8995 359.8995 0.0540 0.0000 361.2488 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1289

3.3 Grading - 2005
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0193 0.0247 0.1965 1.1000e0048.7600e0032.3000e0048.9900e0032.3300e0032.1000e0042.5400e0030.0000 9.7802 9.7802 1.5500e0031.2200e00310.1837 Total 0.0193 0.0247 0.1965 1.1000e0048.7600e0032.3000e0048.9900e0032.3300e0032.1000e0042.5400e0030.0000 9.7802 9.7802 1.5500e0031.2200e00310.1837 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.5062 0.0000 0.5062 0.2010 0.0000 0.2010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.6626 5.6630 2.5349 0.0376 0.2879 0.2879 0.2879 0.2879 0.0000 359.8991 359.8991 0.0540 0.0000 361.2484 Total 0.6626 5.6630 2.5349 0.0376 0.5062 0.2879 0.7941 0.2010 0.2879 0.4889 0.0000 359.8991 359.8991 0.0540 0.0000 361.2484 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1290

3.4 Building Construction - 2005
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.4134 2.2795 1.1214 0.0167 0.1914 0.1914 0.1914 0.1914 0.0000 144.5736 144.5736 0.0337 0.0000 145.4170 Total 0.4134 2.2795 1.1214 0.0167 0.1914 0.1914 0.1914 0.1914 0.0000 144.5736 144.5736 0.0337 0.0000 145.4170 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1291

3.4 Building Construction - 2005
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0239 0.2277 0.0908 1.8200e0035.4500e0038.9400e0030.0144 1.5800e0038.5500e0030.0101 0.0000 20.1238 20.1238 1.1000e0033.0400e00321.0571 Worker 0.0473 0.0604 0.4813 2.6000e0040.0215 5.7000e0040.0220 5.7100e0035.3000e0046.2300e0030.0000 23.9615 23.9615 3.8000e0033.0000e00324.9501 Total 0.0712 0.2880 0.5721 2.0800e0030.0269 9.5100e0030.0364 7.2900e0039.0800e0030.0164 0.0000 44.0854 44.0854 4.9000e0036.0400e00346.0073 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.4134 2.2795 1.1214 0.0167 0.1914 0.1914 0.1914 0.1914 0.0000 144.5734 144.5734 0.0337 0.0000 145.4168 Total 0.4134 2.2795 1.1214 0.0167 0.1914 0.1914 0.1914 0.1914 0.0000 144.5734 144.5734 0.0337 0.0000 145.4168 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1292

3.4 Building Construction - 2006
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.9770 5.3879 2.6505 0.0395 0.4524 0.4524 0.4524 0.4524 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0797 0.0000 343.7129 Total 0.9770 5.3879 2.6505 0.0395 0.4524 0.4524 0.4524 0.4524 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0797 0.0000 343.7129 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1293

3.4 Building Construction - 2006
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0565 0.5381 0.2145 4.2900e0030.0129 0.0211 0.0340 3.7300e0030.0202 0.0239 0.0000 47.5654 47.5654 2.5900e0037.1900e00349.7714 Worker 0.1118 0.1427 1.1376 6.2000e0040.0507 1.3400e0030.0521 0.0135 1.2400e0030.0147 0.0000 56.6364 56.6364 8.9800e0037.0900e00358.9731 Total 0.1683 0.6808 1.3522 4.9100e0030.0636 0.0225 0.0861 0.0172 0.0215 0.0387 0.0000 104.2017 104.2017 0.0116 0.0143 108.7444 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.9770 5.3878 2.6505 0.0395 0.4524 0.4524 0.4524 0.4524 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0797 0.0000 343.7124 Total 0.9770 5.3878 2.6505 0.0395 0.4524 0.4524 0.4524 0.4524 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0797 0.0000 343.7124 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1294

3.4 Building Construction - 2007
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.9808 5.4086 2.6607 0.0397 0.4541 0.4541 0.4541 0.4541 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0801 0.0000 345.0348 Total 0.9808 5.4086 2.6607 0.0397 0.4541 0.4541 0.4541 0.4541 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0801 0.0000 345.0348 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1295

3.4 Building Construction - 2007
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0567 0.5402 0.2154 4.3100e0030.0129 0.0212 0.0341 3.7400e0030.0203 0.0240 0.0000 47.7483 47.7483 2.6000e0037.2100e00349.9628 Worker 0.1122 0.1433 1.1420 6.2000e0040.0509 1.3500e0030.0523 0.0135 1.2500e0030.0148 0.0000 56.8542 56.8542 9.0100e0037.1200e00359.1999 Total 0.1689 0.6834 1.3574 4.9300e0030.0639 0.0226 0.0864 0.0173 0.0215 0.0388 0.0000 104.6025 104.6025 0.0116 0.0143 109.1627 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.9808 5.4086 2.6607 0.0397 0.4541 0.4541 0.4541 0.4541 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0801 0.0000 345.0344 Total 0.9808 5.4086 2.6607 0.0397 0.4541 0.4541 0.4541 0.4541 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0801 0.0000 345.0344 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1296

3.4 Building Construction - 2008
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.9846 5.4293 2.6709 0.0398 0.4558 0.4558 0.4558 0.4558 0.0000 344.3479 344.3479 0.0804 0.0000 346.3568 Total 0.9846 5.4293 2.6709 0.0398 0.4558 0.4558 0.4558 0.4558 0.0000 344.3479 344.3479 0.0804 0.0000 346.3568 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1297

3.4 Building Construction - 2008
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0569 0.5422 0.2162 4.3300e0030.0130 0.0213 0.0343 3.7500e0030.0204 0.0241 0.0000 47.9313 47.9313 2.6100e0037.2400e00350.1542 Worker 0.1127 0.1438 1.1464 6.2000e0040.0511 1.3500e0030.0525 0.0136 1.2500e0030.0149 0.0000 57.0720 57.0720 9.0500e0037.1400e00359.4267 Total 0.1696 0.6861 1.3626 4.9500e0030.0641 0.0226 0.0868 0.0173 0.0216 0.0390 0.0000 105.0033 105.0033 0.0117 0.0144 109.5809 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.9846 5.4293 2.6709 0.0398 0.4558 0.4558 0.4558 0.4558 0.0000 344.3475 344.3475 0.0804 0.0000 346.3564 Total 0.9846 5.4293 2.6709 0.0398 0.4558 0.4558 0.4558 0.4558 0.0000 344.3475 344.3475 0.0804 0.0000 346.3564 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1298

3.4 Building Construction - 2009
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.8155 4.4968 2.2121 0.0330 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.0000 285.2042 285.2042 0.0666 0.0000 286.8680 Total 0.8155 4.4968 2.2121 0.0330 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.0000 285.2042 285.2042 0.0666 0.0000 286.8680 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1299

3.4 Building Construction - 2009
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0471 0.4491 0.1791 3.5800e0030.0108 0.0176 0.0284 3.1100e0030.0169 0.0200 0.0000 39.6988 39.6988 2.1700e0036.0000e00341.5400 Worker 0.0933 0.1191 0.9495 5.2000e0040.0424 1.1200e0030.0435 0.0113 1.0400e0030.0123 0.0000 47.2696 47.2696 7.4900e0035.9200e00349.2198 Total 0.1404 0.5682 1.1285 4.1000e0030.0531 0.0188 0.0719 0.0144 0.0179 0.0323 0.0000 86.9684 86.9684 9.6600e0030.0119 90.7598 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.8155 4.4968 2.2121 0.0330 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.0000 285.2039 285.2039 0.0666 0.0000 286.8677 Total 0.8155 4.4968 2.2121 0.0330 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.0000 285.2039 285.2039 0.0666 0.0000 286.8677 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1300

3.5 Paving - 2009
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1273 0.9167 0.3959 5.9300e0030.0580 0.0580 0.0580 0.0580 0.0000 53.0189 53.0189 0.0104 0.0000 53.2787 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1273 0.9167 0.3959 5.9300e0030.0580 0.0580 0.0580 0.0580 0.0000 53.0189 53.0189 0.0104 0.0000 53.2787 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1301

3.5 Paving - 2009
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.7900e0037.3900e0030.0589 3.0000e0052.6300e0037.0000e0052.7000e0037.0000e0046.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 2.9341 2.9341 4.7000e0043.7000e0043.0551 Total 5.7900e0037.3900e0030.0589 3.0000e0052.6300e0037.0000e0052.7000e0037.0000e0046.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 2.9341 2.9341 4.7000e0043.7000e0043.0551 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1273 0.9167 0.3959 5.9300e0030.0580 0.0580 0.0580 0.0580 0.0000 53.0189 53.0189 0.0104 0.0000 53.2786 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1273 0.9167 0.3959 5.9300e0030.0580 0.0580 0.0580 0.0580 0.0000 53.0189 53.0189 0.0104 0.0000 53.2786 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1302

3.5 Paving - 2010
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0437 0.4821 0.2393 3.5000e0040.0270 0.0270 0.0249 0.0249 0.0000 34.5192 34.5192 0.0101 0.0000 34.7704 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0437 0.4821 0.2393 3.5000e0040.0270 0.0270 0.0249 0.0249 0.0000 34.5192 34.5192 0.0101 0.0000 34.7704 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1303

3.5 Paving - 2010
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9900e0033.3700e0030.0286 2.0000e0051.8500e0033.0000e0051.8800e0034.9000e0043.0000e0055.2000e0040.0000 2.0006 2.0006 2.3000e0041.8000e0042.0594 Total 2.9900e0033.3700e0030.0286 2.0000e0051.8500e0033.0000e0051.8800e0034.9000e0043.0000e0055.2000e0040.0000 2.0006 2.0006 2.3000e0041.8000e0042.0594 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0437 0.4821 0.2393 3.5000e0040.0270 0.0270 0.0249 0.0249 0.0000 34.5191 34.5191 0.0101 0.0000 34.7703 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0437 0.4821 0.2393 3.5000e0040.0270 0.0270 0.0249 0.0249 0.0000 34.5191 34.5191 0.0101 0.0000 34.7703 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1304

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2010
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.8200e0035.4400e0030.0461 4.0000e0052.9900e0035.0000e0053.0300e0037.9000e0044.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 3.2267 3.2267 3.7000e0042.9000e0043.3216 Total 4.8200e0035.4400e0030.0461 4.0000e0052.9900e0035.0000e0053.0300e0037.9000e0044.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 3.2267 3.2267 3.7000e0042.9000e0043.3216 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 2.2977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0225 0.1334 0.0751 1.1000e0040.0121 0.0121 0.0121 0.0121 0.0000 9.5747 9.5747 1.8400e0030.0000 9.6206 Total 2.3202 0.1334 0.0751 1.1000e0040.0121 0.0121 0.0121 0.0121 0.0000 9.5747 9.5747 1.8400e0030.0000 9.6206 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1306

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.6791 3.7858 17.4555 0.0183 1.3399 0.0717 1.4116 0.3594 0.0682 0.4276 0.0000 1,694.587 1 1,694.587
1 0.1784 0.1397 1,740.676
7 Unmitigated 1.6791 3.7858 17.4555 0.0183 1.3399 0.0717 1.4116 0.3594 0.0682 0.4276 0.0000 1,694.587 1 1,694.587
1 0.1784 0.1397 1,740.676
7 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 1,283.84 1,297.44 1162.80 3,575,540 3,575,540 Total 1,283.84 1,297.44 1,162.80 3,575,540 3,575,540
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 38.40 22.60 39.00 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.429507 0.063665 0.169256 0.220737 0.045775 0.009077 0.012800 0.013008 0.000941 0.000466 0.026281 0.002075 0.006413 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1308

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 191.4795 191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 191.4795 191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 172.4596 172.4596 3.3100e0033.1600e003173.4844 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 172.4596 172.4596 3.3100e0033.1600e003173.4844

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1309

3.23177e
+006

0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 172.4596 172.4596 3.3100e0033.1600e003173.4844 Total 0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 172.4596 172.4596 3.3100e0033.1600e003173.4844 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

3.23177e
+006

0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 172.4596 172.4596 3.3100e0033.1600e003173.4844 Total 0.0174 0.1489 0.0634 9.5000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 172.4596 172.4596 3.3100e0033.1600e003173.4844 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1310

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

1.0797e
+006
191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673
Total 191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

1.0797e
+006
191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673
Total 191.4795 0.0162 1.9600e003192.4673
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1311
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 9.6165 0.1587 10.3244 0.0150 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.9900e0030.0111 176.9252 Unmitigated 9.6165 0.1587 10.3244 0.0150 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.9900e0030.0111 176.9252

0.2298 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.9561 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 8.3949 0.1461 9.2751 0.0150 1.2716 1.2716 1.2716 1.2716 112.9917 58.9162 171.9079 1.1300e0030.0111 175.2291 Landscaping 0.0358 0.0126 1.0493 5.0000e0055.4400e0035.4400e0035.4400e0035.4400e0030.0000 1.6495 1.6495 1.8600e0030.0000 1.6961 Total 9.6165 0.1587 10.3244 0.0150 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.9900e0030.0111 176.9252 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1312

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2298 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.9561 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 8.3949 0.1461 9.2751 0.0150 1.2716 1.2716 1.2716 1.2716 112.9917 58.9162 171.9079 1.1300e0030.0111 175.2291 Landscaping 0.0358 0.0126 1.0493 5.0000e0055.4400e0035.4400e0035.4400e0035.4400e0030.0000 1.6495 1.6495 1.8600e0030.0000 1.6961 Total 9.6165 0.1587 10.3244 0.0150 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 1.2771 112.9917 60.5657 173.5575 2.9900e0030.0111 176.9252 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1313
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Unmitigated 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

8.86095 /

5.58625

14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Total 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1314

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

8.86095 /

5.58625

14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Total 14.7817 0.2897 6.9400e00324.0935
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263
Unmitigated 28.4269 1.6800 0.0000 70.4263
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 37 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1315

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 38 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1316

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 39 of 39 Date: 4/21/2022 10:59 AM Barr-Wood Subdivision, 2005 BAU - Tulare County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1317
Appendix B
Biological Evaluation
1318
Biological Resource Assessment
Barr-Wood Subdivision Development Project
Assessor Parcel Number 119-022-041
Visalia, CA
Prepared for
324 South Santa Fe Street, Suite A
Visalia, CA 93292
Prepared by
1401 Fulton St, Suite 918
Fresno, CA 93721
July 1, 2022
1319

Page 2 of 25 ends

Executive Summary
The developer 4Creeks, Inc. (4Creeks) seeks to construct the Barr-Wood Housing Subdivision (Project) on the corner of Roeben Street and West Whitendale Avenue in Visalia, California. Currently, the project site is 69.35 acres of farmland on APN 119-022-041. 4Creeks has tasked Soar Environmental Consulting Inc. (Soar Environmental) to provide a Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prior to implementation of the proposed Project.

The objectives of this Assessment were to: 1) provide a general characterization of biological resources for the property; 2) inventory plant and wildlife species; 3) evaluate the potential for federal or state listed plants and animals species afforded other special regulatory protection; and 4) describe the property’s sensitive biological resources and applicable federal, state, and local land use policies.

This BRA provides information about the biological resources within the Project footprint. Prior to conducting a habitat assessment (i.e., site visit for biological resources), Soar Environmental researched the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California, to compile a list of special-status species that could potentially be present in the vicinity of the Project area. Soar Environmental researched specific species and habitat requirements for the species noted in the CNDDB, IPaC and CNPS databases and included species listing status, and proximal species observations in this report.

No special-status plant or wildlife species were observed in the Project area during the field survey on June 27, 2022. Based on the Literature Review (Section 2.1 of this report) special-status species that have the potential to occur in the Project area based on documented occurrences in the vicinity include:
• San Joaquin kit fox
• Swainson's hawk
• vernal pool fairy shrimp
• yellow-billed cuckoo
All other special-status species identified in the record search are unlikely to occur in the Project area, due to lack of suitable habitat, proximity, and time since historical occurrences. No listed species were observed during the habitat assessment of the Project site, and no suitable habitat features, or conditions were observed that would be conducive for any of the special status species identified in this report. 1320

Page 3 of 25 ends

Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................2

1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................5

1.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................................5

1.2 Environmental Setting ...................................................................................................................6

2. Methods................................................................................................................................................8

2.1 Literature Review...........................................................................................................................8

2.2 Field Reconnaissance Methodology.............................................................................................10

3. Habitat Assessment Results.................................................................................................................11

4. Special-Status Species .........................................................................................................................12

4.1 Special-Status Wildlife Species Descriptions................................................................................17

4.1.1 San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica).........................................................................17

4.1.2 Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsonii)......................................................................................17

4.1.3 Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi) ........................................................................17

4.1.4. Western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis)........................................17

5. Findings...............................................................................................................................................18

7. Study Limitations.................................................................................................................................18

8. Works Cited.........................................................................................................................................19 List of Figures
Figure 1. Project Location.........................................................................................................................6 Figure 2 – Project Site Boundary ...............................................................................................................7 Figure 3 – Site Plan....................................................................................................................................8 Figure 4 – Historical Special-status Species Locations Proximate to the Project Site..............................10 List of Tables
Table 1– Wildlife and Plant Species Observed On Project Site................................................................11 Table 2 – Potentially Occurring Listed Wildlife Species...........................................................................13 Table 3 – Potentially Occurring Listed Plant Species...............................................................................16 1321

Page 4 of 25 ends

APPENDIX A: Site Photos..........................................................................................................................200 Photo 1 – Northern Boundary (View East) ..........................................................................................21 Photo 2 – Eastern Boundary (View South) ..........................................................................................21 Photo 3 – Southern Boundary (View West).........................................................................................22 Photo 4 – Western Boundary (View North).........................................................................................22 Photo 5 – Center of Project Site (North to South)...............................................................................23 Photo 6 – Center of Project Site (South to North)...............................................................................23 Photo 7 – Center of Project Site (East to West)...................................................................................24 Photo 8 – Center of Project Site (West to East)...................................................................................24 Photo 9 – Southeast Panhandle of Project Boundary (View East).......................................................25 Photo 10 – Canal Dividing Panhandle from the Rest of the Project Site .............................................25

1322

Page 5 of 25 ends

1. Introduction
The proposed Project is a housing subdivision to be constructed on 69.35 acres of fallow farmland in the city of Visalia, Visalia County, California. Soar Environmental Consulting, Inc. (Soar Environmental) has prepared this Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) for 4Creeks, Inc. (4Creeks) in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements.

A review of California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) was conducted to identify sensitive wildlife species. Results indicated a habitat assessment would be necessary to search for potential suitable habitat or presence for the 17 following sensitive wildlife species: Two amphibian species include:

California red-legged frog, and California tiger salamander. Three bird species: Swainson's hawk, tricolored blackbird, and western yellow-billed cuckoo. One fish species: delta smelt. Five invertebrates:
vernal pool fairy shrimp, conservancy fairy shrimp, monarch butterfly, valley elderberry longhorn beetle, and vernal pool tadpole shrimp. Four mammals: Fresno kangaroo rat, Tipton kangaroo rat, fisher, and San Joaquin kit fox. Two reptiles were identified: blunt-nosed leopard lizard, and giant garter snake.

Potential sensitive plant species were reviewed using the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California and CNDDB records. The data records search identified the following 6 sensitive plant species historically occurring in the vicinity of the Project site: California jewelflower, Hoover's Spurge, San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass, San Joaquin adobe sunburst, and Greene's tuctoria.

A habitat assessment was conducted in the Project area on June 27, 2022, by Soar Environmental biologist Ben Arax. The purpose of the Habitat Assessment Survey was to search for the presence of special-status species or suitable habitats that have historically been observed within, or surrounding, the Project area.

No special-statusspecies were observed during the site visit, and no suitable habitat was observed for any of the sensitive species identified in this report.

1.1 Project Location
The Project site is located on the northwest corner of Roeben Street and West Whitendale Avenue in Visalia, California. It is on the western edge of the City, in an agricultural and residential interface environment, approximately 1.25 miles east of State Route (SR) 99 and 1.4 miles south of State Route (SR) 198. It is comprised of Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 119-022-041. In the USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangle of Visalia, it can be found in Township 19 South, Range 24 East, section 3, NW ¼ section, South 1/8. A map to the Project site location is depicted in Figure 1.
1323

Page 6 of 25 ends

Figure 1. Project Location

1.2 Environmental Setting
Land use in the area is agricultural and residential. The Project site is approximately 1.25 miles east of State Route (SR) 99, and 1.4 miles south of SR 198. Agricultural land becomes more prevalent to the west while land use to the east is largely urbanized. The project area is rectangular with a Panhandle extending from the southeast corner. The Panhandle is divided by an irrigation canal running north and south, and the rest of the project area is divided by a natural surface road that runs east to west through the center of the property. The project site is bounded by residential neighborhoods to the north and east, separated by a wooden fence. Agricultural land borders west and southern boundaries with orchard trees to the west and a cattle ranch to the South.

The topography of the area is completely flat at approximately 300 feet elevation, vegetative ground cover was recently mowed. There are no structures on the property, no trees or bushes that would provide adequate habitat for nesting birds, and there were no small mammal Burrows that would provide adequate refuge for San Joaquin kitfox. Powerline poles exist along the main roads, but not on the 1324

Page 7 of 25 ends

property itself, and did not appear to harbor any raptor nests. The irrigation canal on the east side of the property has dirt roads on both sides of the canal with little to no vegetation. There were no signs of pooling water or vernal pool habitat within the Project site.

Figure 1 – Project Site Boundary
1325

Page 8 of 25 ends

Figure 3 – Site Plan

2. Methods

2.1 Literature Review
Prior to performing the habitat assessment, Soar Environmental conducted a records search for threatened or endangered species that could potentially occur in the vicinity of the Project area. The records search included a review of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Rare Plant Inventory. The area covered by the data records search included USGS 7.5 minute quadrangles of Visalia, Cairns Corner, Exeter, Goshen, Ivanhoe, Monson, Paige, Traver, and Tulare 7.5-minute USGS quadrangles. From these sources a list of special-status plant and animal species was generated. Proximal locations of special-status plant and animal species located within 5 miles of the Project site are shown in (Figure 4).

Based on a review of CNDDB records (conducted April 7, 2022) it was determined there was potential for 13 State listed special-status species to occur within or in the vicinity of the Project site (listed below). • California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) • San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica)
1326

Page 9 of 25 ends

• Swainson's hawk
• Tipton kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides) • Tricolored blackbird
• Valley elderberry longhorn beetle
• Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi)
• Vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi)
• Western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis) • California Jewelflower
• Hoover's spurge (Euphorbia hooveri)
• San Joaquin adobe sunburst (Pseudobahia peirsonii)
• San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass (Orcuttia inaequalis) A search of the IPaC database indicated 11 additional Federally listed sensitive wildlife and plant species likely to occur within or near the Project site include:
• Blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia silus)
• California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii)
• Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta conservatio)
• Delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus)
• Fisher (Pekania pennanti)
• Fresno kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides exilis)
• Giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas)
• Monarch butterfly (Danuas plexippus)
• Greene's tuctoria (Tuctoria greenei)
• Succulent owl's-clover (Castilleja campestris ssp. Succulenta) A search of the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Rare Plant Inventory did not identify any additional plant species that were not identified in the CNDDB or IPaC records search.

No special-status plant or wildlife species were observed in the Project area during the habitat assessment on June 27, 2022. However, based on a review of CNDDB, IPaC, and CNPS, and analysis of proximal historic occurrences, records indicated potential presence of the following special-status species. • San Joaquin kit fox
• Swainson's hawk
• vernal pool fairy shrimp
• yellow-billed cuckoo
1327

Page 10 of 25 ends

Figure 4 – Historical Special-status Species Locations Proximate to the Project Site This map shows the closest and most recent special-status species locations from the CNDDB, IPaC, and CNPS Online Rare Plant Inventory

2.2 Field Reconnaissance Methodology
On June 27, 2022, Soar Environmental biologist Ben Arax conducted a habitat assessment on the property for the above mentioned species. Walking the perimeter of the property, and meandering transects throughout the Project area, the surveyor searched for bird nests, possible small mammal dens, identified vegetation, and looked for vernal pools or other signs of wildlife occupancy. Survey efforts emphasized the search for special-status species and associated suitable habitats, that had documented occurrences in the data records search of the CNDDB, IPaC, and CNPS databases. The surrounding area was also surveyed by vehicle in accessible areas within 0.5 miles of the Project site, to look for biological resources and features that may be conducive for suitable habitat of the identified special-status species. Photos were taken of the Project boundaries, center of the Project site in 4 cardinal directions, and other points of interest depicting the habitat and potential biological resources (Appendix A). 1328

Page 11 of 25 ends

3. Habitat Assessment Results
During the habitat assessment, there were no observations of special-status plant or wildlife species. The Project site is an inactive agricultural field on the western edge of the City, with active agricultural land to the west and an urbanized residential environment to the east. A red tailed hawk and several other bird species were observed during the site visit, however there are no trees or bushes that would provide adequate refugia for the nesting bird species identified in this report, and no raptor nests were observed on any of the power line poles within the vicinity of the Project site. There were no signs of pooling water or vernal pools that would provide suitable habitat for vernal pool fairy shrimp. The ground was highly visible from recent mowing, and no small mammal burrows were observed anywhere on the property that would provide adequate refugia for San Joaquin kit fox.

Although no special-status plant or wildlife species were observed during the site visit, Soar Environmental biologists observed some common reptile and bird species flying around the area, listed in (Table 1) below, along with plant species observed onsite. No other wildlife species were observed during the habitat assessment.

Table 1– Wildlife and Plant Species Observed On Project Site Wildlife Species Observed Listing Status Plant Species Observed Listing Status American crow
(Corvus brachyrhynchos) MTBA
Common wild oat
(Avena fatua) None
Brown-headed cowbird
(Molothrus ater) MTBA Cutleaf geranium
(Geranium dissectum) None
Great egret
(Ardea alba) MTBA Field bindweed
(Convolvulus arvensis) None
House finch
(Haemorhous mexicanus) MTBA Great brome
(Bromus diandrus) None
House sparrow
(Passer domesticus) MTBA Mediterranean barley (Hordeum marinum) None Killdeer
(Charadrius vociferus) MTBA Narrowleaf plantain
(Plantago lanceolata) None
Lesser goldfinch
(Spinus psaltria) MTBA Ripgut brome(Bromus diandrus) None Mourning dove
(Zenaida macroura) None
Russian thistle
(Salsola tragus) None
Northern mockingbird
(Mimus polyglottos) MTBA Poison hemlock
(Conium maculatum) None
Red-tailed hawk
(Buteo jamaicensis) MTBA Prickly lettuce(Lactuca serriola) None 1329

Page 12 of 25 ends

Rock pigeon
(Columba livia) None Seaside barley
(Hordeum marinum) None
Western kingbird
(Tyrannus verticalis) MTBA Wall barley
(Hordeum murinum) None
Common side-blotched lizard
(Uta stansiburana) None Wild oat
(Avena fatua) None
Western fence lizard
(Sceloporus occidentalis) None Yellow star-thistle
(Centaurea solstitialis) None

4. Special-Status Species
Special-status plants and animals that have a reasonable possibility to occur in the Project area based on habitat suitability and requirements, elevation and geographic range, soils, topography, surrounding land uses, and proximity of known occurrences in the CNDDB, IPaC, and CNPS databases to the Project area are listed in Tables 2 and 3. The likelihood for occurrence of special-status species was assessed using information from the various listed sources, wildlife and botanical surveys. Narratives are provided for species for which there are land use planning and regulatory implications. Special-status species for which there are no habitat features are excluded from consideration due to the lack of suitable habitat and distance from the subject property.

Based upon a review of the resources and databases listed in Section 2.1 (Literature Review) for the Visalia, Cairns Corner, Exeter, Goshen, Ivanhoe, Monson, Paige, Traver, and Tulare USGS 7.5-minute quadrangles; it was determined that 19 special-status plant species have been documented in the vicinity of the Project area. Of these 19 special-status species, 3 were determined to have a moderate potential for occurrence, and 4 species was determined to have potential for occurrence.

Species with Potential for Occurrence:
• San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica)
• Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni)
• Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi)
• Western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis) Special-status species and sensitive habitats include plant and wildlife taxa, or other unique biological features that are afforded special protection by local land use policies, state and federal regulations.

Special-status plant and animal species are those that are listed as rare, threatened, or endangered under the state or federal Endangered Species Acts. Vegetation communities may warrant specialstatus if they are of limited distribution, have high wildlife value, or are particularly vulnerable to disturbance. Listed and special-status species are defined as:
• Listed or proposed for listing under the state or Federal Endangered Species acts. • Protected under other regulations (e.g., Migratory Bird Treaty Act). • CDFG Species of Special Concern.
• Listed as species of concern by CNPS or USFWS; or
1330

Page 13 of 25 ends

• Receive consideration during environmental review under CEQA.

Special-status species considered for this analysis are based on field survey results, review of the CNDDB occurrence records of species, review of the USFWS lists for special-status species occurring in the region, and CNPS literature (Tables 2 and 3).
• Present: Species known to occur on the site, based on CNDDB records, and/or was observed on the site during the field survey.
• High: Species known to occur on or near the site (based on CNDDB records within 8 km or 5 mi) and there is suitable habitat on the site.
• Low: Species known to occur in the vicinity of the site, and there is marginal habitat onsite. -ORSpecies is not known to occur in the vicinity of the site, however there is suitable habitat on the site.
• None: Species is not known to occur on or in the vicinity of the site and there is no suitable habitat for the species on the site. -OR- Species was surveyed for during the appropriate season with negative results.

Table 2 – Potentially Occurring Listed Wildlife Species Common/ Scientific Name Listing
Status* Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Amphibians
California red-legged frog
(Rana draytonii) FT, SSC
Standing waters,
freshwater wetland.

Forest, scrub, woodland
riparian areas. Requires a
breeding pond, slowflowing stream. Will use
small mammal burrows.

None: Species is not
known to occur in the
vicinity of the site and
there is no suitable habitat
for the species on the site.

California tiger salamander
(Ambystoma californiense) FT, ST
Grasslands, oak savannah
riparian woodlands, lower
elevations of coniferous
forests, ditches, vernal
pools, and wetlands.

None: Species is not
known to occur in the
vicinity of the site and
there is no suitable habitat
for the species on the site.

Birds
Swainson's hawk
(Buteo swainsoni) ST, MBTA
Nests in isolated trees or
riparian woodlands
adjacent to suitable
foraging habitat
(agricultural fields,
grasslands, etc.).

Low: Species known to
occur in the vicinity of the
site, and there is marginal
habitat onsite.

Tricolored blackbird
(Agelaius tricolor)

ST, BCC,
MBTA
Found in areas near water,
such as marshes,
grasslands, and wetlands.

They require some sort of
None: Species is not
known to occur on or in
the vicinity of the site and
there is no suitable habitat
1331

Page 14 of 25 ends

substrate nearby to build
nests.
for the species on the site.

Western yellow-billed cuckoo
(Coccyzus americanus
occidentalis)

FT, SE,
MBTA
Woodlands near streams
or lakes, abandoned
farmland, old fruit
orchards, successional
shrubland and dense
thickets.