Visalia City Council
December 18, 2023

LOS D B A B A
Approach Delay 38.0 4.7 4.9
Approach LOS D A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 90
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63
Intersection Signal Delay: 6.7 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 13: Demaree St & Shannon Pkwy
1670
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 13: Demaree St & Shannon Pkwy 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 120 36 1120 385 53 905
Future Volume (veh/h) 120 36 1120 385 53 905
Number 3 18 2 12 1 6
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1716 1716 1863 1750 1716 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 130 39 1217 418 58 984
Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 169 151 2076 695 304 2819
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80
Sat Flow, veh/h 1634 1458 2700 872 282 3632
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 130 39 816 819 58 984
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1634 1458 1770 1709 282 1770
Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 7.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 7.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.51 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 169 151 1410 1361 304 2819
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.26 0.58 0.60 0.19 0.35
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 481 429 1410 1361 304 2819
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.3 37.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.2 0.9 1.6 1.8 1.4 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.5 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.5 3.6
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.5 38.1 1.6 1.8 3.7 2.9
LnGrp LOS D D A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 169 1635 1042
Approach Delay, s/veh 44.5 1.7 3.0
Approach LOS D A A
Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 76.2 76.2 13.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 54.5 54.5 26.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 9.1 9.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 25.5 23.9 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 4.7
HCM 2010 LOS A
1671
Lanes, Volumes, Timings PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 15: Demaree St & Flagstaff Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 60 0 36 5 970 45 63 884 0
Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 60 0 36 5 970 45 63 884 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.949 0.993
Flt Protected 0.970 0.997
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1863 0 0 1715 0 0 3514 0 0 3529 0
Flt Permitted 0.810 0.952 0.791
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1863 0 0 1432 0 0 3346 0 0 2800 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 32 10
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 579 1069 1173 668
Travel Time (s) 7.2 13.3 17.8 10.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 65 0 39 5 1054 49 68 961 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 1108 0 0 1029 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 Total Split (%) 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 68.9% 68.9% 68.9% 68.9% Maximum Green (s) 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 57.5 57.5 57.5 57.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
1672
Lanes, Volumes, Timings PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 15: Demaree St & Flagstaff Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.0 73.9 73.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.82 0.82
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.40 0.45
Control Delay 37.3 3.6 2.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 37.3 3.6 2.9

LOS D A A
Approach Delay 37.3 3.6 2.9
Approach LOS D A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 90
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.56
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.8 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 15: Demaree St & Flagstaff Ave
1673
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 15: Demaree St & Flagstaff Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 60 0 36 5 970 45 63 884 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 60 0 36 5 970 45 63 884 0
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 65 0 39 5 1054 49 68 961 0
Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 0 161 0 140 5 48 43 2737 127 174 2356 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1863 0 870 59 557 3 3364 156 158 2981 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 104 0 0 584 0 524 488 541 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1863 0 1486 0 0 1856 0 1668 1444 1610 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.37 0.01 0.09 0.14 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 161 0 193 0 0 1550 0 1357 1220 1310 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 486 0 451 0 0 1550 0 1357 1220 1310 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.29 0.93 0.93 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.3 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.9 0.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 3.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 2.5 0.9 0.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 104 1108 1029
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 42.6 2.5 0.9
Approach LOS D A A
Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 77.7 12.3 77.7 12.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 57.5 23.5 57.5 23.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.7 0.0 2.0 8.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 13.9 0.0 14.2 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 3.6
HCM 2010 LOS A
1674
Lanes, Volumes, Timings PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 17: Linwood St & Riggen Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1011 53 78 1177 35 88
Future Volume (vph) 1011 53 78 1177 35 88
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.98
Frt 0.993 0.903
Flt Protected 0.997 0.986
Satd. Flow (prot) 1850 0 0 1857 1501 0
Flt Permitted 0.578 0.986
Satd. Flow (perm) 1850 0 0 1077 1493 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 7 89
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 55
Link Distance (ft) 2655 2640 1360
Travel Time (s) 36.2 36.0 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 1099 58 85 1279 38 96
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1157 0 0 1364 134 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.11 1.11 1.00 1.11 1.11
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot
Protected Phases 4 8 2
Permitted Phases 8
Detector Phase 4 8 8 2
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 97.5 97.5 97.5 22.5
1675
Lanes, Volumes, Timings PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 17: Linwood St & Riggen Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Total Split (%) 81.3% 81.3% 81.3% 18.8%
Maximum Green (s) 93.0 93.0 93.0 18.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 93.0 93.0 18.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.78 0.78 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.81 1.64 0.45
Control Delay 19.3 314.6 22.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 19.3 314.6 22.8

LOS B F C
Approach Delay 19.3 314.6 22.8
Approach LOS B F C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.64
Intersection Signal Delay: 171.2 Intersection LOS: F
Intersection Capacity Utilization 148.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 17: Linwood St & Riggen Ave
1676
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 17: Linwood St & Riggen Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1011 53 78 1177 35 88
Future Volume (veh/h) 1011 53 78 1177 35 88
Number 4 14 3 8 5 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1750 1750 1863 1716 1750
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1099 58 85 1279 38 96
Adj No. of Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 0 0
Cap, veh/h 1359 72 71 834 62 158
Arrive On Green 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.15 0.15
Sat Flow, veh/h 1754 93 51 1076 416 1051
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1157 1364 0 135 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1846 1127 0 1478 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 45.3 47.7 0.0 10.3 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 45.3 93.0 0.0 10.3 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.05 0.06 0.28 0.71
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1431 905 0 222 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.81 1.51 0.00 0.61 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1431 905 0 222 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.54 0.74 0.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 8.1 20.4 0.0 47.7 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.8 232.5 0.0 11.8 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 23.6 88.4 0.0 4.9 0.0
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 10.9 253.0 0.0 59.6 0.0
LnGrp LOS B F E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1157 1364 135
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.9 253.0 59.6
Approach LOS B F E
Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 2 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 97.5 97.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 93.0 93.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 47.3 95.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 28.9 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 137.7
HCM 2010 LOS F
Notes
1677
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 17: Linwood St & Riggen Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 1678
Lanes, Volumes, Timings PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 19: Country Center St & Riggen Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 70 785 167 114 608 68 121 79 95 44 94 63 Future Volume (vph) 70 785 167 114 608 68 121 79 95 44 94 63 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 Storage Length (ft) 250 0 160 0 195 0 130 130
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 Frt 0.974 0.985 0.918 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1630 3427 0 1630 3474 0 1630 3213 0 1630 1863 1458 Flt Permitted 0.285 0.155 0.691 0.633
Satd. Flow (perm) 487 3427 0 265 3474 0 1178 3213 0 1080 1863 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 38 18 96 68
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 55 55
Link Distance (ft) 2884 7452 1333 1674
Travel Time (s) 39.3 101.6 16.5 20.8
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 2 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 76 853 182 124 661 74 132 86 103 48 102 68 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 1035 0 124 735 0 132 189 0 48 102 68 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.11 1.00 1.11 1.11 1.00 1.11 1.11 1.00 1.11 1.11 1.00 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 6
Switch Phase
1679
Lanes, Volumes, Timings PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 19: Country Center St & Riggen Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Total Split (%) 52.2% 52.2% 52.2% 52.2% 47.8% 47.8% 47.8% 47.8% 47.8% Maximum Green (s) 42.5 42.5 42.5 42.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 41.4 41.4 41.4 41.4 41.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.68 1.06 0.48 0.24 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.10
Control Delay 20.9 21.4 129.9 18.1 17.8 8.1 16.2 15.9 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 20.9 21.4 129.9 18.1 17.8 8.1 16.2 15.9 4.5

LOS C C F B B A B B A
Approach Delay 21.4 34.2 12.1 12.4
Approach LOS C C B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 90
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.06
Intersection Signal Delay: 23.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 19: Country Center St & Riggen Ave
1680
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary PM 2041+Project with Mitigation� 19: Country Center St & Riggen Ave 6/28/2022
5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 9 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 70 785 167 114 608 68 121 79 95 44 94 63 Future Volume (veh/h) 70 785 167 114 608 68 121 79 95 44 94 63 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1716 1863 1750 1716 1863 1750 1716 1863 1750 1716 1863 1716 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 76 853 182 124 661 74 132 86 103 48 102 68 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 302 1364 291 205 1511 169 519 757 666 503 797 614 Arrive On Green 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 662 2888 616 500 3200 358 1112 1770 1557 1093 1863 1434 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 76 523 512 124 365 370 132 86 103 48 102 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 662 1770 1734 500 1770 1788 1112 1770 1557 1093 1863 1434 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 19.9 19.9 22.2 12.3 12.4 7.3 2.6 3.6 2.5 3.0 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.2 19.9 19.9 42.2 12.3 12.4 10.3 2.6 3.6 6.2 3.0 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 302 836 819 205 836 844 519 757 666 503 797 614 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.63 0.63 0.60 0.44 0.44 0.25 0.11 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 302 836 819 205 836 844 519 757 666 503 797 614 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.17 0.17 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.5 17.8 17.8 33.6 15.8 15.8 18.7 15.5 15.8 17.7 15.6 15.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.3 0.3 4.9 0.4 0.4 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.4 9.6 9.5 3.3 6.1 6.1 2.4 1.4 1.7 0.8 1.6 1.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.6 18.0 18.0 38.5 16.2 16.2 19.9 15.8 16.3 18.0 15.9 15.8 LnGrp LOS C B B D B B B B B B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1111 859 321 218
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.4 19.4 17.6 16.4
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.0 47.0 43.0 47.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.5 42.5 38.5 42.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 22.2 8.2 44.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.1 10.0 2.2 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.4
HCM 2010 LOS B
1681
Traffic Study 646-02
4Creeks Tentative Development
Visalia, CA 63

SIGNAL WARRANTS

COUNT DATA
1682
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 1800 30th St, Ste 260
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Bakersfield, CA 93301
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 2 2 2 1 7 1 1 0 0 2 9
1:00 AM 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 4
2:00 AM 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 2 1 3 6
3:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 4 6
4:00 AM 1 0 3 1 5 4 2 11 11 28 33
5:00 AM 2 2 4 4 12 9 15 15 21 60 72
6:00 AM 8 5 10 10 33 16 21 25 29 91 124
7:00 AM 16 9 13 20 58 26 29 32 23 110 168
8:00 AM 14 16 11 7 48 19 16 25 20 80 128
9:00 AM 11 12 16 9 48 9 12 10 17 48 96
10:00 AM 5 6 10 10 31 6 6 11 4 27 58
11:00 AM 6 14 11 6 37 11 10 10 10 41 78
12:00 PM 8 9 13 9 39 11 12 11 6 40 79
1:00 PM 8 15 13 16 52 11 12 13 6 42 94
2:00 PM 18 16 13 24 71 9 12 15 13 49 120
3:00 PM 15 30 32 27 104 17 7 11 13 48 152
4:00 PM 25 33 25 21 104 10 16 9 10 45 149
5:00 PM 22 33 29 23 107 10 12 13 8 43 150
6:00 PM 18 12 19 14 63 6 10 12 7 35 98
7:00 PM 8 10 7 5 30 6 4 5 9 24 54
8:00 PM 10 10 6 7 33 6 7 3 5 21 54
9:00 PM 2 5 7 10 24 3 2 4 2 11 35
10:00 PM 6 3 4 2 15 5 5 3 4 17 32
11:00 PM 2 2 2 3 9 0 1 0 0 1 10
939 870
AM% 43.2% AM Peak 168 7:00 am to 8:00 am AM P.H.F. 0.93 PM% 56.8% PM Peak 167 3:30 pm to 4:30 pm PM P.H.F. 0.85 24 Hour Count Report
Ave 320 36.37097408
West of Akers St
Thursday, March 24, 2022 Clear
-119.3500257
2 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 51.9% 48.1%
1809
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
1683
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 1800 30th St, Ste 260
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Bakersfield, CA 93301
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 3 3 1 1 8 1 0 0 0 1 9
1:00 AM 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
2:00 AM 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 4
3:00 AM 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 1 1 3 6
4:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 4 4 9 10 27 29
5:00 AM 1 4 6 7 18 11 11 15 23 60 78
6:00 AM 10 9 13 12 44 14 23 32 25 94 138
7:00 AM 18 11 23 25 77 23 31 42 43 139 216
8:00 AM 20 19 10 12 61 40 23 26 23 112 173
9:00 AM 11 14 15 17 57 8 10 9 13 40 97
10:00 AM 7 4 11 11 33 12 10 5 5 32 65
11:00 AM 8 14 16 10 48 8 7 8 6 29 77
12:00 PM 12 11 18 8 49 8 13 11 9 41 90
1:00 PM 16 14 19 20 69 11 15 10 7 43 112
2:00 PM 21 15 16 24 76 11 10 13 13 47 123
3:00 PM 15 47 29 36 127 28 20 18 6 72 199
4:00 PM 25 38 27 27 117 16 22 11 17 66 183
5:00 PM 32 41 30 23 126 10 16 13 8 47 173
6:00 PM 18 16 15 18 67 4 9 11 13 37 104
7:00 PM 13 12 8 10 43 7 4 7 6 24 67
8:00 PM 13 9 9 8 39 5 10 6 5 26 65
9:00 PM 4 5 6 9 24 5 4 3 2 14 38
10:00 PM 8 5 5 2 20 6 6 1 4 17 37
11:00 PM 3 1 4 5 13 3 1 0 0 4 17
1126 977
AM% 42.6% AM Peak 235 7:30 am to 8:30 am AM P.H.F. 0.86 PM% 57.4% PM Peak 199 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm PM P.H.F. 0.74 24 Hour Count Report
Ave 320 36.37097451
West of Demaree St
Thursday, March 24, 2022 Clear
-119.3322195
2 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 53.5% 46.5%
2103
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
1684
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 1800 30th St, Ste 260
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Bakersfield, CA 93301
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 3 2 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 1 7
1:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 3
2:00 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 3 5
3:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 3 4
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 7 7
5:00 AM 1 2 3 2 8 3 6 7 13 29 37
6:00 AM 0 3 6 9 18 11 14 17 10 52 70
7:00 AM 5 6 12 12 35 15 21 26 42 104 139
8:00 AM 21 15 14 6 56 40 16 13 12 81 137
9:00 AM 8 6 9 8 31 11 4 5 10 30 61
10:00 AM 3 7 9 9 28 6 6 8 6 26 54
11:00 AM 6 10 14 9 39 12 5 9 9 35 74
12:00 PM 15 8 15 12 50 6 10 10 12 38 88
1:00 PM 16 11 13 15 55 11 7 7 9 34 89
2:00 PM 17 13 11 19 60 7 15 15 12 49 109
3:00 PM 20 25 26 43 114 19 13 17 12 61 175
4:00 PM 20 36 28 25 109 11 19 11 14 55 164
5:00 PM 33 35 23 39 130 11 15 11 7 44 174
6:00 PM 24 24 15 16 79 18 13 18 19 68 147
7:00 PM 26 15 11 23 75 16 5 9 18 48 123
8:00 PM 13 13 8 12 46 8 10 5 3 26 72
9:00 PM 2 7 7 8 24 4 8 5 1 18 42
10:00 PM 8 4 4 1 17 6 4 1 2 13 30
11:00 PM 3 1 4 2 10 1 2 2 0 5 15
995 831
AM% 32.7% AM Peak 184 7:30 am to 8:30 am AM P.H.F. 0.75 PM% 67.3% PM Peak 184 3:30 pm to 4:30 pm PM P.H.F. 0.84 24 Hour Count Report
Pratt Rd 36.3655526
East of Demaree St
Thursday, March 24, 2022 Clear
-119.3321271
2 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 54.5% 45.5%
1826
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
1685
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 1800 30th St, Ste 260
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Bakersfield, CA 93301
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1:00 AM 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
2:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 3
3:00 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:00 AM 0 1 2 3 6 1 0 0 6 7 13
5:00 AM 0 3 1 2 6 5 3 7 7 22 28
6:00 AM 2 3 6 11 22 10 7 14 14 45 67
7:00 AM 6 14 12 22 54 14 16 20 23 73 127
8:00 AM 19 12 10 5 46 28 15 8 6 57 103
9:00 AM 7 8 5 7 27 4 6 11 4 25 52
10:00 AM 3 11 2 12 28 10 11 5 4 30 58
11:00 AM 9 11 7 10 37 5 8 3 14 30 67
12:00 PM 11 4 6 13 34 5 5 5 6 21 55
1:00 PM 9 12 12 14 47 8 8 6 9 31 78
2:00 PM 10 7 16 14 47 6 7 13 12 38 85
3:00 PM 18 27 27 21 93 31 18 11 13 73 166
4:00 PM 23 28 20 28 99 10 10 13 16 49 148
5:00 PM 14 23 30 33 100 9 10 11 10 40 140
6:00 PM 16 17 14 19 66 6 9 8 6 29 95
7:00 PM 11 13 8 12 44 7 4 4 13 28 72
8:00 PM 11 8 6 3 28 7 3 4 2 16 44
9:00 PM 7 5 5 5 22 4 4 4 4 16 38
10:00 PM 1 2 2 2 7 3 1 0 0 4 11
11:00 PM 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 5
826 636
AM% 35.9% AM Peak 154 7:15 am to 8:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.82 PM% 64.1% PM Peak 166 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm PM P.H.F. 0.85 2 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 56.5% 43.5%
1462
24 Hour Count Report
Pratt Rd 36.3655148
West of County Center St
Tuesday, May 10, 2022 Clear
-119.3226879
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
1686
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: N Demaree St & Shannon Pkwy
City: Visalia Project ID:

Control: 2-Way Stop (EB/WB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 56 9 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 2 1 139
7:15 AM 0 61 6 0 5 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 8 0 160
7:30 AM 0 59 15 0 0 65 0 1 0 0 0 0 34 0 7 0 181
7:45 AM 0 74 18 0 2 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 4 0 195
8:00 AM 0 52 18 0 1 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 3 0 169
8:15 AM 0 61 19 0 1 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 2 0 164
8:30 AM 0 48 9 0 1 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 116
8:45 AM 0 41 9 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 99

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 452 103 0 10 433 0 1 0 0 0 0 196 0 27 1 1223 APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 81.44% 18.56% 0.00% 2.25% 97.52% 0.00% 0.23% 87.50% 0.00% 12.05% 0.45% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 246 70 0 4 250 0 1 0 0 0 0 122 0 16 0 709 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.831 0.921 0.000 0.500 0.906 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.897 0.000 0.571 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
11:00 AM 0 48 16 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 3 0 138
11:15 AM 0 70 16 0 5 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 4 0 171
11:30 AM 0 46 21 1 1 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 0 139
11:45 AM 0 59 14 1 1 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 1 0 137
12:00 PM 0 56 13 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 1 0 141
12:15 PM 0 54 17 2 1 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 2 0 156
12:30 PM 0 48 17 0 1 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 3 0 129
12:45 PM 0 55 8 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 129

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 436 122 4 9 389 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 0 16 0 1140 APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 77.58% 21.71% 0.71% 2.26% 97.74% 0.00% 0.00% 91.11% 0.00% 8.89% 0.00% PEAK HR : 11:15 AM 162 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 231 64 2 7 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 8 0 588 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.825 0.762 0.500 0.350 0.909 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.760 0.000 0.500 0.000 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
2:00 PM 0 47 9 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 2 0 121
2:15 PM 0 44 14 1 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 1 1 134
2:30 PM 0 61 13 0 3 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 147
2:45 PM 0 64 15 0 2 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 160
3:00 PM 0 58 20 0 4 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 156
3:15 PM 0 80 21 0 3 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 1 0 198
3:30 PM 0 51 30 0 1 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 4 0 182
3:45 PM 0 62 30 0 4 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 1 0 222
4:00 PM 0 67 30 0 4 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 2 0 208
4:15 PM 0 78 22 0 2 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 1 0 213
4:30 PM 0 71 38 0 2 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 2 0 208
4:45 PM 0 76 33 0 3 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 2 0 206
5:00 PM 0 63 30 0 3 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 181
5:15 PM 0 82 29 0 3 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 2 0 203
5:30 PM 0 59 32 0 3 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 1 0 187
5:45 PM 0 63 20 0 3 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 150

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 1026 386 1 40 1110 0 0 0 0 0 0 292 0 20 1 2876 APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 72.61% 27.32% 0.07% 3.48% 96.52% 0.00% 0.00% 93.29% 0.00% 6.39% 0.32% PEAK HR : 03:45 PM 288 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 278 120 0 12 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 6 0 851 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.891 0.789 0.000 0.750 0.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.850 0.000 0.750 0.000 21-060003-064
4/13/2021
03:45 PM - 04:45 PM

0.958 0.913 0.846 0.875
11:15 AM - 12:15 PM

0.860 0.863 0.924 0.724
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.909

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NOON NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.859 0.898 0.841

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
N Demaree St N Demaree St Shannon Pkwy Shannon Pkwy
1687
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 1800 30th St, Ste 260
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Bakersfield, CA 93301
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 0 3 5
5:00 AM 2 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 1 2 6
6:00 AM 0 1 2 4 7 4 2 2 2 10 17
7:00 AM 8 12 13 15 48 3 7 4 4 18 66
8:00 AM 11 11 9 14 45 11 9 3 10 33 78
9:00 AM 13 13 9 11 46 6 13 11 4 34 80
10:00 AM 13 7 11 8 39 8 9 6 10 33 72
11:00 AM 12 11 12 18 53 5 11 10 13 39 92
12:00 PM 12 18 14 12 56 14 7 16 13 50 106
1:00 PM 15 12 13 8 48 10 12 15 12 49 97
2:00 PM 10 19 13 16 58 8 12 11 6 37 95
3:00 PM 12 9 13 15 49 9 11 17 14 51 100
4:00 PM 13 9 13 19 54 11 13 9 14 47 101
5:00 PM 17 17 17 9 60 14 16 8 16 54 114
6:00 PM 7 13 8 8 36 13 12 10 8 43 79
7:00 PM 6 5 14 3 28 5 10 13 8 36 64
8:00 PM 3 4 4 2 13 5 1 10 5 21 34
9:00 PM 3 3 1 2 9 2 2 4 1 9 18
10:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 4 5
11:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 3
660 575
AM% 33.9% AM Peak 92 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.74 PM% 66.1% PM Peak 122 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.92 24 Hour Count Report
Flagstaff Ave 36.35922007
East of Demaree St
Tuesday, May 10, 2022 Clear
-119.3317922
2 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 53.4% 46.6%
1235
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
1688
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Linwood St/Rd 104 & W Riggin Ave/Ave 312
City: Visalia Project ID:

Control: 1-Way Stop (NB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 1 0 50 2 91 0 0 93 201 7:15 AM 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 3 0 63 2 115 0 0 117 251 7:30 AM 5 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 87 1 139 0 0 140 326 7:45 AM 2 0 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 4 0 85 4 136 0 0 140 324 8:00 AM 4 0 11 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 10 0 109 6 140 0 0 146 394 8:15 AM 4 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 10 0 130 5 102 0 0 107 381 8:30 AM 2 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 2 0 62 3 85 0 0 88 222 8:45 AM 3 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 2 0 54 1 76 0 0 77 197

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 24 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 608 32 0 24 884 0 0 2296 APPROACH %'s : 44.44% 0.00% 55.56% 0.00% 0.00% 95.00% 5.00% 0.00% 2.64% 97.36% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 15 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 387 24 0 16 517 0 0 979 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.750 0.000 0.455 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.806 0.600 0.000 0.667 0.923 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
11:00 AM 7 0 4 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 5 0 125 5 94 0 0 99 371 11:15 AM 4 0 10 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 4 0 107 6 97 0 0 103 345 11:30 AM 2 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 2 0 93 4 76 0 0 80 282 11:45 AM 5 0 7 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 4 0 114 7 90 0 0 97 349 12:00 PM 9 0 5 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 6 0 147 6 136 0 0 142 464 12:15 PM 4 0 7 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 6 0 144 9 118 0 0 127 437 12:30 PM 2 0 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 3 0 97 4 87 0 0 91 299 12:45 PM 1 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 1 0 77 8 91 0 0 99 263

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 34 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 873 31 0 49 789 0 0 2810 APPROACH %'s : 41.46% 0.00% 58.54% 0.00% 0.00% 96.57% 3.43% 0.00% 5.85% 94.15% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 11:45 AM 164 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 20 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 483 19 0 26 431 0 0 1003 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.556 0.000 0.857 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.856 0.792 0.000 0.722 0.792 0.000 0.000 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
2:00 PM 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 3 0 77 2 89 0 0 91 249 2:15 PM 2 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 2 0 88 3 74 0 0 77 265 2:30 PM 2 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 5 0 119 4 96 0 0 100 348 2:45 PM 3 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 5 0 75 2 106 0 0 108 272 3:00 PM 5 0 8 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 5 0 152 8 99 0 0 107 437 3:15 PM 5 0 9 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 6 0 176 10 111 0 0 121 501 3:30 PM 2 0 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 4 0 143 6 103 0 0 109 413 3:45 PM 2 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 2 0 148 12 109 0 0 121 433 4:00 PM 1 0 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 8 0 186 7 88 0 0 95 487 4:15 PM 6 0 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 3 0 154 7 102 0 0 109 437 4:30 PM 5 0 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 7 0 177 1 115 0 0 116 488 4:45 PM 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 9 0 121 5 72 0 0 77 335 5:00 PM 2 0 9 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 8 0 177 5 106 0 0 111 487 5:15 PM 2 0 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 7 0 139 3 94 0 0 97 389 5:30 PM 1 0 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 3 0 152 3 105 0 0 108 426 5:45 PM 5 0 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 3 0 100 7 86 0 0 93 309

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 44 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 2104 80 0 85 1555 0 0 6276 APPROACH %'s : 32.84% 0.00% 67.16% 0.00% 0.00% 96.34% 3.66% 0.00% 5.18% 94.82% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 03:45 PM 288 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 14 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 645 20 0 27 414 0 0 1143 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.583 0.000 0.639 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.906 0.625 0.000 0.563 0.900 0.000 0.000 21-060003-075
4/13/2021
03:45 PM - 04:45 PM

0.586 0.925 0.894 0.911
11:45 AM - 12:45 PM

0.540 0.786 0.854 0.805
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.621

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NOON NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.583 0.790 0.913

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
Linwood St/Rd 104 Linwood St/Rd 104 W Riggin Ave/Ave 312 W Riggin Ave/Ave 312 1689
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 1800 30th St, Ste 260
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Bakersfield, CA 93301
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 19 9 14 3 45 15 5 6 5 31 76
1:00 AM 2 3 8 6 19 1 3 6 1 11 30
2:00 AM 0 2 4 5 11 2 4 6 4 16 27
3:00 AM 6 3 3 4 16 7 11 26 28 72 88
4:00 AM 3 5 5 15 28 11 30 67 56 164 192
5:00 AM 17 18 28 25 88 50 66 84 73 273 361
6:00 AM 21 28 46 56 151 77 80 96 106 359 510
7:00 AM 70 65 91 107 333 132 109 155 147 543 876
8:00 AM 133 140 82 86 441 181 126 116 115 538 979
9:00 AM 73 71 81 76 301 69 93 69 85 316 617
10:00 AM 75 90 84 94 343 89 103 105 82 379 722
11:00 AM 99 96 91 108 394 88 96 80 118 382 776
12:00 PM 109 112 80 99 400 103 109 108 113 433 833
1:00 PM 94 116 137 118 465 107 137 125 118 487 952
2:00 PM 110 112 135 139 496 113 134 108 134 489 985
3:00 PM 137 187 188 159 671 143 139 122 130 534 1205
4:00 PM 159 165 170 147 641 132 140 131 120 523 1164
5:00 PM 152 156 182 175 665 116 136 132 122 506 1171
6:00 PM 142 141 100 105 488 121 126 112 91 450 938
7:00 PM 96 98 92 92 378 98 102 107 110 417 795
8:00 PM 93 86 79 68 326 91 75 70 65 301 627
9:00 PM 56 50 58 44 208 75 61 44 38 218 426
10:00 PM 50 26 27 31 134 31 26 24 17 98 232
11:00 PM 39 20 14 14 87 10 12 11 19 52 139
7129 7592
AM% 35.7% AM Peak 1080 7:30 am to 8:30 am AM P.H.F. 0.86 PM% 64.3% PM Peak 1216 3:15 pm to 4:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.93 24 Hour Count Report
Riggin Ave 36.35642557
West of County Center St
Tuesday, May 10, 2022 Clear
-119.3229038
4 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 48.4% 51.6%
14721
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
1690
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Linwood St & W Ferguson Ave
City: Visalia Project ID: 20-02003-106
Control: 4-Way Stop Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 11 6 2 0 19 3 11 5 0 19 3 26 6 0 35 3 16 3 0 22 168 7:15 AM 8 5 2 0 15 10 21 4 0 35 0 31 12 0 43 9 49 9 0 67 253 7:30 AM 18 7 6 0 31 10 12 13 0 35 6 32 19 0 57 6 52 4 0 62 308 7:45 AM 31 2 9 0 42 23 27 7 1 58 3 39 15 0 57 2 77 9 0 88 402 8:00 AM 29 6 20 0 55 31 22 12 0 65 3 41 28 0 72 9 60 25 0 94 478 8:15 AM 22 5 25 0 52 10 14 5 1 30 6 40 26 0 72 7 46 18 0 71 379 8:30 AM 11 11 3 0 25 6 5 6 0 17 4 11 6 0 21 2 27 1 0 30 156 8:45 AM 5 3 3 0 11 4 5 9 0 18 2 20 6 0 28 3 27 5 0 35 149

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 135 45 70 0 97 117 61 2 27 240 118 0 41 354 74 0 1381 APPROACH %'s : 54.00% 18.00% 28.00% 0.00% 35.02% 42.24% 22.02% 0.72% 7.01% 62.34% 30.65% 0.00% 8.74% 75.48% 15.78% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:15 AM 38 37 44 07:45 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 86 20 37 0 74 82 36 1 12 143 74 0 26 238 47 0 876 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.694 0.714 0.463 0.000 0.597 0.759 0.692 0.250 0.500 0.872 0.661 0.000 0.722 0.773 0.470 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
11:00 AM 7 3 2 0 12 4 6 2 0 12 5 27 11 0 43 5 17 4 0 26 160 11:15 AM 13 5 2 0 20 2 9 3 0 14 3 18 9 0 30 1 20 5 0 26 154 11:30 AM 11 3 2 0 16 6 2 3 0 11 4 20 11 0 35 2 16 4 0 22 146 11:45 AM 11 1 2 0 14 5 3 5 0 13 6 26 14 0 46 3 22 2 0 27 173 12:00 PM 10 10 2 0 22 5 5 2 0 12 4 31 11 0 46 3 30 4 0 37 197 12:15 PM 7 3 2 0 12 1 8 3 0 12 2 32 6 0 40 4 22 5 0 31 159 12:30 PM 7 4 1 0 12 5 6 5 0 16 2 23 11 1 37 0 27 3 0 30 160 12:45 PM 10 5 3 0 18 6 11 2 0 19 2 22 14 0 38 2 21 9 0 32 182

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 76 34 16 0 34 50 25 0 28 199 87 1 20 175 36 0 781 APPROACH %'s : 60.32% 26.98% 12.70% 0.00% 31.19% 45.87% 22.94% 0.00% 8.89% 63.17% 27.62% 0.32% 8.66% 75.76% 15.58% 0.00% PEAK HR : 11:45 AM 164 161 168 12:00 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 35 18 7 0 16 22 15 0 14 112 42 1 10 101 14 0 407 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.795 0.450 0.875 0.000 0.800 0.688 0.750 0.000 0.583 0.875 0.750 0.250 0.625 0.842 0.700 0.000 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
2:00 PM 13 5 8 0 26 10 7 7 0 24 1 35 11 0 47 11 24 9 0 44 238 2:15 PM 11 11 14 0 36 3 9 1 0 13 10 42 22 0 74 8 30 11 0 49 295 2:30 PM 10 6 1 0 17 6 7 3 0 16 0 36 16 0 52 3 19 11 0 33 203 2:45 PM 15 5 3 0 23 11 7 4 0 22 2 38 18 0 58 6 30 8 0 44 250 3:00 PM 13 14 13 1 41 10 15 5 0 30 7 37 23 0 67 8 31 15 0 54 330 3:15 PM 10 4 3 0 17 7 12 10 0 29 4 51 24 0 79 15 43 13 0 71 321 3:30 PM 14 8 5 0 27 2 5 4 0 11 7 56 26 0 89 7 33 9 0 49 303 3:45 PM 11 12 6 0 29 5 7 4 0 16 9 40 27 0 76 9 30 11 0 50 292 4:00 PM 13 8 3 0 24 6 10 2 0 18 7 49 22 0 78 3 25 7 0 35 275 4:15 PM 16 1 6 0 23 3 4 6 0 13 13 43 20 0 76 5 36 10 0 51 275 4:30 PM 11 7 4 0 22 7 12 4 0 23 7 44 27 0 78 6 32 8 0 46 292 4:45 PM 17 11 8 0 36 3 7 7 0 17 9 54 23 0 86 9 29 5 0 43 321 5:00 PM 13 8 2 0 23 4 6 6 0 16 10 63 31 0 104 4 34 7 0 45 331 5:15 PM 12 4 4 0 20 4 12 3 0 19 16 59 37 0 112 5 45 10 0 60 362 5:30 PM 20 11 11 0 42 2 12 2 0 16 10 66 32 0 108 5 43 7 0 55 387 5:45 PM 15 14 5 0 34 7 24 5 0 36 12 63 30 0 105 4 32 7 0 43 393

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 214 129 96 1 90 156 73 0 124 776 389 0 108 516 148 0 2820 APPROACH %'s : 48.64% 29.32% 21.82% 0.23% 28.21% 48.90% 22.88% 0.00% 9.62% 60.20% 30.18% 0.00% 13.99% 66.84% 19.17% 0.00% PEAK HR : 05:00 PM 293 281 296 05:15 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 60 37 22 0 17 54 16 0 48 251 130 0 18 154 31 0 838 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.750 0.661 0.500 0.000 0.607 0.563 0.667 0.000 0.750 0.951 0.878 0.000 0.900 0.856 0.775 0.000

EASTBOUND
2/13/2020
W Ferguson Ave

NORTHBOUND
W Ferguson Ave

0.827

WESTBOUND
Linwood St Linwood St

WESTBOUND

0.742 0.795

EASTBOUND

0.918
PM
AM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
11:45 AM - 12:45 PM

NORTHBOUND

0.650

NORTHBOUND NOON

0.682

0.458
Total

0.533

0.516

0.958

WESTBOUND

0.846

0.845

SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND

SOUTHBOUND

0.708 0.604

0.828
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM

SOUTHBOUND
1691
Location ID: 1
North/South: N Country Center St Date:

East/West: W Riggin Ave City: Visalia, CA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
7:00 8 12 1 1 72 6 8 8 8 2 43 2 149
7:15 8 8 7 5 77 9 18 5 8 8 53 6 184
7:30 10 17 14 6 94 14 23 1 26 1 51 5 228
7:45 12 14 9 5 99 7 14 7 18 5 61 5 221
8:00 3 8 5 3 74 5 10 8 5 5 74 1 174
8:15 9 10 6 3 67 7 8 7 13 5 74 5 185
8:30 7 10 6 6 69 3 5 13 17 7 70 3 188
8:45 13 7 8 5 76 10 12 3 10 5 79 7 204
Total Volume: 61 75 48 29 546 53 85 45 92 32 438 29 1533 Approach % 33% 41% 26% 5% 87% 8% 38% 20% 41% 6% 88% 6%
Peak Hr Begin: 7:30
PHV 30 43 29 15 290 28 48 20 54 13 225 13 808
PHF 0.886
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
16:00 6 7 3 9 92 14 15 10 7 14 114 17 268
16:15 6 15 8 8 100 21 10 10 16 9 110 9 281
16:30 6 18 18 3 101 15 13 12 17 20 125 10 312
16:45 9 10 8 8 101 18 15 8 18 23 133 10 316
17:00 10 16 3 13 109 21 18 15 14 25 128 16 338
17:15 10 12 13 16 85 21 14 22 9 17 114 9 297
17:30 8 26 6 12 100 22 24 14 15 23 127 7 333
17:45 3 8 12 9 81 20 14 8 12 18 121 15 278
Total Volume: 51 98 62 68 669 131 107 86 94 130 845 82 2423 Approach % 24% 46% 29% 8% 77% 15% 37% 30% 33% 12% 80% 8% Peak Hr Begin: 16:45
PHV 33 56 26 42 344 71 62 51 49 77 436 37 1284
PHF 0.935 0.950
Eastbound

0.821 0.921 0.880
Totals:

Southbound Westbound
Totals:
8/5/2021
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

0.708 0.841 0.693 0.872
Northbound
1692
Location ID: 2
North/South: N Country Center St Date:

East/West: Shannon Pkwy City: Visalia, CA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
7:00 2 3 1 0 7 0 1 7 2 2 1 0 24
7:15 7 5 0 0 5 1 2 6 0 1 8 0 30
7:30 6 8 1 0 10 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 37
7:45 3 10 1 0 6 2 1 5 1 2 12 0 38
8:00 6 8 0 2 9 2 3 5 1 5 3 0 39
8:15 5 3 0 0 3 1 7 5 2 5 9 0 35
8:30 1 7 0 1 7 2 7 2 0 0 3 0 27
8:45 3 5 1 0 8 3 5 3 2 2 9 0 37
Total Volume: 29 43 4 3 48 14 25 30 11 17 42 1 267
Approach % 38% 57% 5% 5% 74% 22% 38% 45% 17% 28% 70% 2% Peak Hr Begin: 7:30
PHV 17 26 2 2 25 8 12 14 7 12 23 1 149
PHF 0.955
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
16:00 3 5 2 0 12 3 10 0 3 1 15 5 52
16:15 5 1 1 0 13 8 2 8 1 1 18 5 55
16:30 1 7 1 1 16 12 3 5 0 3 13 0 54
16:45 0 6 0 0 16 1 6 2 1 5 14 5 48
17:00 6 7 2 3 13 7 9 12 2 2 9 3 66
17:15 2 2 1 2 13 7 12 13 2 5 15 0 64
17:30 1 9 1 2 20 3 12 8 0 10 15 1 72
17:45 5 3 0 2 13 0 9 6 3 6 21 1 60
Total Volume: 20 35 8 10 99 36 55 46 12 29 104 17 471
Approach % 32% 56% 13% 7% 68% 25% 49% 41% 11% 19% 69% 11% Peak Hr Begin: 17:00
PHV 12 19 4 9 50 15 36 33 7 20 52 5 262
PHF 0.802 0.910
Eastbound

0.673 0.841 0.826
Totals:

Southbound Westbound
Totals:
8/5/2021
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

0.865 0.729 0.688 0.750
Northbound
1693
Location ID: 3
North/South: N Country Center St Date:

East/West: Pratt Rd City: Visalia, CA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
7:00 0 0 0 0 12 2 8 0 3 1 8 0 30
7:15 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 3 0 7 0 19
7:30 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 3 5 13 0 29
7:45 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 7 2 13 0 32
8:00 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 2 1 15 0 26
8:15 0 0 0 0 9 1 1 0 3 2 14 0 27
8:30 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 22
8:45 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0 2 0 14 0 22
Total Volume: 0 0 0 0 80 5 10 0 22 12 78 0 207
Approach % 0% 0% 0% 0% 94% 6% 31% 0% 69% 13% 87% 0%
Peak Hr Begin: 7:30
PHV 0 0 0 0 41 1 2 0 14 9 47 0 114
PHF 0.891
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
16:00 0 0 0 0 10 2 2 0 0 6 21 0 36
16:15 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 2 3 17 0 33
16:30 0 0 0 0 9 1 1 0 1 3 20 0 31
16:45 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 2 1 12 0 19
17:00 0 0 0 0 16 3 2 0 2 6 20 0 43
17:15 0 0 0 0 10 0 2 0 5 3 20 0 35
17:30 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 2 3 20 0 35
17:45 0 0 0 0 10 2 1 0 0 1 18 0 29
Total Volume: 0 0 0 0 79 8 10 0 13 24 127 0 261
Approach % 0% 0% 0% 0% 91% 9% 43% 0% 57% 16% 84% 0%
Peak Hr Begin: 17:00
PHV 0 0 0 0 44 5 6 0 8 12 67 0 142
PHF 0.898 0.826
Eastbound

0.000 0.721 0.583
Totals:

Southbound Westbound
Totals:
8/5/2021
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

0.000 0.875 0.571 0.933
Northbound
1694
Location ID: 4
North/South: Mooney Blvd Date:

East/West: Pratt Rd City: Visalia, CA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 17 0 0 28
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 0 0 15
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 12 0 0 22
7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13 0 0 23
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 16 0 0 24
8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 15 0 0 20
8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 6 0 0 18
8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 14 0 0 22
Total Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 87 0 0 172
Approach % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0%
Peak Hr Begin: 7:30
PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 48 0 0 89
PHF 0.927
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 23 0 0 34
16:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 18 0 1 28
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 18 0 0 27
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 13 0 0 17
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 22 0 0 36
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 21 0 0 27
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22 0 0 29
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 20 0 0 28
Total Volume: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 136 0 1 226
Approach % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 99% 0% 1%
Peak Hr Begin: 17:00
PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 73 0 0 120
PHF 0.961 0.833
Eastbound

0.000 0.000 0.691
Totals:

Southbound Westbound
Totals:
8/5/2021
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

0.000 0.000 0.854 0.857
Northbound
1695
Location ID: 5
North/South: N Demaree St Date:

East/West: River Way Dr City: Visalia, CA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
7:00 2 49 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 1 0 0 94
7:15 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 83 2 7 0 2 115
7:30 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 77 0 7 0 0 124
7:45 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 14 0 2 127
8:00 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 52 2 3 0 0 88
8:15 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 46 3 3 0 0 82
8:30 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 48 3 9 0 0 95
8:45 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 35 1 5 0 0 72
Total Volume: 2 333 0 0 0 0 0 403 12 43 0 4 797
Approach % 1% 99% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 97% 3% 91% 0% 9%
Peak Hr Begin: 7:00
PHV 2 180 0 0 0 0 0 246 3 25 0 4 460
PHF 0.906
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
16:00 2 49 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 1 0 0 166
16:15 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 83 2 7 0 2 130
16:30 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 77 0 7 0 0 122
16:45 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 14 0 2 130
17:00 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 52 2 3 0 0 161
17:15 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 46 3 3 0 0 127
17:30 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 48 3 9 0 0 143
17:45 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 35 1 5 0 0 126
Total Volume: 5 528 0 0 0 0 0 462 59 45 0 6 1105
Approach % 1% 99% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 89% 11% 88% 0% 12%
Peak Hr Begin: 16:45
PHV 4 259 0 0 0 0 0 245 30 18 0 5 561
PHF 0.719 0.871
Eastbound

0.843 0.000 0.917
Totals:

Southbound Westbound
Totals:
8/5/2021
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

0.858 0.000 0.841 0.518
Northbound
1696
Location ID: 6
North/South: N Chinowith St Date:

East/West: River Way Dr City: Visalia, CA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
7:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:15 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
7:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
8:30 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4
8:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Total Volume: 1 0 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 15
Approach % 14% 0% 86% 67% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0%
Peak Hr Begin: 7:45
PHV 1 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9
PHF 0.563
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lanes: R T L R T L R T L R T L
16:00 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
16:15 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
16:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
16:45 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
17:00 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
17:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
17:30 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6
17:45 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total Volume: 0 0 11 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 24
Approach % 0% 0% 100% 92% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0%
Peak Hr Begin: 17:00
PHV 0 0 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13
PHF 0.250 0.542
Eastbound

0.583 0.625 0.000
Totals:

Southbound Westbound
Totals:
8/5/2021
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

0.417 0.375 0.000 0.250
Northbound
1697
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 65 8 1 0 4 35 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8 2 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 68 4 0 0 7 59 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 14 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 76 8 1 0 7 45 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 7 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 67 12 1 0 7 54 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 22 1 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 35 4 0 0 4 55 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 16 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 53 6 1 0 7 35 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 41 7 2 0 1 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 4 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 44 6 2 0 6 53 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 0 TOTAL 0 0 386 48 8 0 38 327 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 74 8
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 49 24 2 0 14 69 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 57 18 1 0 4 64 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 60 23 0 0 14 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 6 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 37 21 0 0 18 78 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 44 18 1 0 6 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 8 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 55 18 2 0 11 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 3 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 57 25 0 0 7 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 55 22 1 0 12 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 TOTAL 0 0 357 145 7 0 73 441 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 41 1
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 212 25 2 0 22 183 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 51 3 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 176 74 3 0 43 243 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 19 1 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.894 2.8% PM 0 243 43 0 0.872
PM 0.915 1.7% AM 0 183 22 0 0.899
PHF ##### #####
AM PM
0 0 51 19
0 0 0 0
0 0 40 23
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.784 0.808 PHF

0.823 0 0 212 25 AM

0.868 0 0 176 74 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Pratt Rd
Northbound Westbound
Demaree St
Demaree St
Turning Movement Report
Demaree St @ Pratt Rd
Tulare
Wednesday, June 02, 2021 Clear

36.3656
-119.3321
1698
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 69 7 1 0 1 42 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 2 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 64 4 0 0 4 68 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 7 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 76 18 1 0 1 74 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 6 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 71 16 2 0 1 70 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 6 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 42 15 0 0 2 71 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 2 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 60 13 1 0 0 50 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 2 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 46 6 2 0 4 57 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 1 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 47 16 2 0 2 64 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 2 0 TOTAL 0 0 411 82 9 0 15 430 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 185 0 25 2 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 1 0 83 24 2 0 3 91 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 76 35 1 0 1 71 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 2 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 81 33 0 0 7 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 2 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 64 37 0 0 2 88 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 1 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 69 43 0 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 83 30 1 0 1 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 2 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 89 33 0 0 2 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 2 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 71 30 1 0 3 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 1 0 TOTAL 1 0 533 228 5 0 18 533 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 0 10 0 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 218 46 3 0 8 246 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 18 1 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 1 0 262 111 3 0 12 288 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 5 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.910 2.0% PM 0 288 12 0 0.915
PM 0.907 1.5% AM 0 246 8 0 0.977
PHF ##### #####
AM PM
0 0 18 5
0 0 0 0
0 0 101 76
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.85 0.633 PHF

0.825 0 0 218 46 AM

0.954 1 0 262 111 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Shannon Pkwy
Northbound Westbound
Demaree St
Demaree St
Turning Movement Report
Demaree St @ Shannon Pkwy
Tulare
Wednesday, June 02, 2021 Clear

36.3616
-119.3321
1699
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 1 18 14 13 1 0 3 15 4 1 0 2 29 1 3 0 24 89 2 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 8 15 13 1 0 4 23 4 1 0 7 43 2 4 0 27 71 9 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 7 22 23 2 0 3 29 8 4 0 13 42 4 7 0 46 85 9 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 12 33 33 1 0 3 45 11 0 0 8 42 6 2 0 42 97 16 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 11 64 20 2 1 29 43 26 1 0 43 61 14 8 0 30 87 45 3 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 3 34 36 1 0 29 69 24 0 0 14 62 8 6 1 25 76 19 4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 9 21 18 2 0 2 15 1 0 0 2 46 6 0 0 30 61 6 4 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 6 9 21 2 0 1 13 2 4 0 0 47 9 2 0 27 45 3 0 TOTAL 1 63 182 151 12 1 66 218 71 11 0 77 322 44 29 1 219 529 95 16 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 6 25 42 1 0 19 24 3 0 0 4 124 16 2 1 35 68 13 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 7 15 53 0 0 3 13 6 0 0 8 113 16 1 0 37 71 2 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 14 22 54 0 0 3 6 7 0 0 1 117 21 1 0 36 67 4 2 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 2 8 24 38 0 0 3 14 1 0 0 1 113 14 0 0 42 54 2 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 1 11 20 47 1 0 3 7 4 0 0 3 140 19 1 0 34 62 1 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 1 9 25 42 0 0 8 12 2 0 0 3 129 12 1 0 37 65 6 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 1 16 26 37 1 0 1 13 3 0 0 3 105 22 0 2 26 69 8 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 1 20 16 24 0 1 2 7 4 0 0 1 99 35 0 0 36 74 7 1 TOTAL 6 78 151 290 3 1 38 82 28 0 0 23 813 133 6 3 244 459 38 10 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 28 131 96 6 1 56 161 60 5 0 67 179 28 20 1 124 298 77 8 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 2 30 75 160 1 0 25 49 15 0 0 13 404 58 4 1 129 225 19 8 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.799 3.0% PM 15 49 25 0 0.556
PM 0.916 1.1% AM 60 161 56 1 0.656
PHF 0.95 0.672
AM PM
0 0 77 19
13 67 298 225
404 179 124 129
58 28 1 1
PM AM
PHF

0.893 0.926 PHF

0.787 0 28 131 96 AM

0.867 2 30 75 160 PM
Turning Movement Report
Riggin Ave @ Akers St
Tulare
Thursday, May 27, 2021 Clear

36.3566
-119.3500

Riggin Ave
Northbound Westbound
Riggin Ave
Akers St
Akers St
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
1700
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 1 6 0 4 111 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 3 3 0 4 113 0 2 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 1 7 0 3 147 0 2 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 12 0 0 3 156 0 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 3 7 0 9 137 0 6 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 4 7 0 8 114 0 4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 2 0 0 1 83 0 3 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 6 0 2 71 0 0 TOTAL 0 31 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 558 24 31 0 32 807 0 20 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 11 3 0 8 118 0 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 7 0 0 4 110 0 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 7 2 0 7 110 0 3 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 11 0 0 9 88 0 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 4 2 0 2 103 0 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 4 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 12 1 0 6 107 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 3 0 0 6 106 0 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 14 0 0 6 112 0 0 TOTAL 0 26 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1121 59 8 0 42 739 0 10 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 16 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 18 18 0 21 479 0 15 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 11 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 573 30 5 0 25 368 0 8 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.918 3.7% PM 0 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.895 1.3% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.897 0.83
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 479 368
573 344 21 25
30 18 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.906 0.901 PHF

0.679 0 16 0 22 AM

0.795 0 11 0 24 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Riggin Ave
Northbound Westbound
Riggin Ave
Linwood St
Turning Movement Report
Riggin Ave @ Linwood St
Tulare
Thursday, May 27, 2021 Clear

36.3565
-119.3410
1701
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 7 66 9 0 0 3 48 26 0 0 8 25 14 3 1 27 72 4 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 13 66 14 6 0 7 50 24 1 1 13 38 16 2 3 47 78 8 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 13 83 19 6 0 7 85 33 3 0 33 54 20 7 4 42 89 14 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 18 76 29 1 0 4 96 25 1 0 24 61 18 0 4 38 108 7 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 19 60 26 3 0 9 76 30 3 0 23 78 22 7 4 39 83 9 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 15 89 30 3 0 8 62 26 2 0 23 91 15 7 3 56 72 7 4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 8 47 16 2 0 6 44 16 2 0 21 43 14 0 12 45 53 7 7 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 8 54 15 4 0 4 59 15 1 0 20 50 15 6 7 38 44 2 0 TOTAL 0 86 467 137 23 0 43 451 170 13 1 142 381 115 28 35 288 519 51 21 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 16 101 37 1 0 21 70 21 1 0 46 112 20 1 1 59 83 7 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 13 120 37 3 0 13 79 18 2 0 42 103 21 2 19 48 90 8 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 15 80 39 2 0 12 79 20 1 0 36 113 19 1 16 71 80 9 2 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 16 95 38 2 0 13 65 15 2 0 43 105 19 0 14 65 69 7 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 21 100 58 1 0 12 69 21 0 0 47 124 22 2 15 56 74 2 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 15 108 32 2 0 12 82 24 0 0 43 125 24 1 19 65 77 6 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 18 114 45 3 0 14 84 19 1 0 25 89 15 0 23 60 81 6 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 13 85 32 3 0 16 49 30 0 0 44 84 16 0 14 42 84 12 1 TOTAL 0 109 695 274 17 0 96 500 144 7 0 282 740 134 7 104 403 552 49 10 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 55 266 90 12 0 25 276 99 9 0 89 245 64 18 15 151 306 32 11 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 60 361 149 8 0 43 260 68 3 0 137 383 69 3 61 212 260 18 4 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.973 2.9% PM 68 260 43 0 0.909
PM 0.955 0.9% AM 99 276 25 0 0.917
PHF 0.882 0.888
AM PM
0 0 32 18
137 89 306 260
383 245 151 212
69 64 15 61
PM AM
PHF

0.92 0.937 PHF

0.886 0 55 266 90 AM

0.925 0 60 361 149 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Riggin Ave
Northbound Westbound
Riggin Ave
Demaree St
Demaree St
Turning Movement Report
Riggin Ave @ Demaree St
Tulare
Thursday, May 27, 2021 Clear

36.3565
-119.3320
1702
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 11 14 8 4 0 3 32 11 4 0 1 1 8 3 0 30 6 12 2 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 10 21 17 3 0 1 35 7 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 39 1 11 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 11 18 14 6 0 9 55 7 4 0 2 2 10 4 0 29 6 9 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 19 23 30 4 0 2 77 11 4 0 2 0 2 3 0 34 10 17 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 10 30 22 6 0 8 47 8 6 0 1 3 8 3 0 29 6 13 3 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 1 15 23 22 3 0 10 28 4 4 0 6 2 6 7 0 21 4 18 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 8 26 20 8 0 7 24 7 3 0 2 2 6 1 0 17 3 9 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 15 24 9 10 0 9 26 6 6 0 4 0 7 4 0 18 6 13 0 TOTAL 1 90 163 128 40 0 44 295 54 33 0 17 10 43 25 0 195 37 92 8 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 12 52 32 4 0 7 37 6 1 0 13 10 19 6 0 20 2 8 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 4 30 21 2 0 8 19 4 3 0 7 9 22 1 0 9 2 10 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 6 52 32 1 0 9 35 0 0 0 12 15 37 1 0 11 4 12 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 2 34 20 0 0 4 42 2 2 0 9 7 7 2 0 4 0 8 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 1 55 30 1 0 12 18 0 0 0 11 12 30 0 0 9 1 7 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 3 45 20 2 0 7 23 1 1 0 4 7 2 0 0 10 1 11 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 2 53 30 1 0 7 26 1 0 0 10 1 17 0 0 14 0 8 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 1 30 28 1 0 7 22 7 2 0 4 1 9 1 0 13 2 7 0 TOTAL 0 29 318 192 12 0 54 202 19 9 0 64 56 129 10 0 82 12 63 2 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 1 50 85 80 17 0 26 188 27 17 0 10 7 23 16 0 102 23 51 5 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 22 152 95 7 0 25 121 11 6 0 37 37 77 9 0 40 8 34 2 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.817 8.2% PM 11 121 25 0 0.872
PM 0.804 3.6% AM 27 188 26 0 0.735
PHF 0.64 0.769
AM PM
0 0 51 34
37 10 23 8
37 7 102 40
77 23 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.8 0.759 PHF

0.831 1 50 85 80 AM

0.773 0 22 152 95 PM
Turning Movement Report
Ferguson Ave @ Shirk Rd
Tulare
Thursday, May 27, 2021 Clear

36.3510
-119.3678

Ferguson Ave
Northbound Westbound
Sunnyview Ave
Shirk Rd
Shirk Rd
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
1703
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 3 30 9 1 0 8 4 8 2 0 2 19 3 1 0 9 30 4 1 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 2 37 13 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 2 18 2 0 0 9 37 2 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 44 17 0 0 11 4 10 1 0 3 36 0 2 0 4 44 2 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 68 13 0 0 13 7 11 0 0 4 23 1 1 0 15 68 8 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 2 62 21 1 0 8 3 26 1 0 11 44 0 2 0 9 62 4 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 53 10 0 0 7 4 17 1 0 11 45 0 2 0 9 53 1 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 1 22 8 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 28 3 0 0 6 22 4 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 31 14 2 0 4 2 3 0 0 1 15 0 3 0 9 31 1 0 TOTAL 0 10 315 95 4 0 56 23 78 5 0 37 207 9 11 0 63 315 25 4 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 1 34 18 1 0 7 2 6 1 0 6 59 0 0 0 15 34 13 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 37 13 0 0 10 2 6 0 0 4 42 1 0 0 8 37 7 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 2 34 13 0 0 9 3 2 0 0 7 54 3 0 0 12 34 9 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 2 19 6 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 7 29 0 0 0 9 19 13 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 34 15 0 0 7 7 4 0 0 6 44 1 0 0 13 34 12 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 30 6 0 0 6 7 4 0 0 7 32 1 1 0 19 30 8 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 31 13 0 0 7 10 1 0 0 3 39 7 0 0 13 31 10 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 1 21 14 0 0 7 6 7 0 0 6 32 0 0 0 12 21 9 0 TOTAL 0 6 218 89 1 0 49 35 28 1 0 40 300 12 1 0 92 218 73 2 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 4 206 55 1 0 35 17 58 3 0 27 135 1 7 0 34 206 14 2 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 5 113 45 1 0 26 9 13 1 0 21 167 4 0 0 40 113 38 2 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.865 1.6% PM 13 9 26 0 0.75
PM 0.839 0.7% AM 58 17 35 0 0.809
PHF 0.814 0.799
AM PM
0 0 14 38
21 27 206 113
167 135 34 40
4 1 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.765 0.838 PHF

0.86 0 4 206 55 AM

0.849 0 5 113 45 PM
Turning Movement Report
Ferguson Ave @ Roeben St
Tulare
Thursday, May 27, 2021 Clear

36.3511
-119.3589

Ferguson Ave
Northbound Westbound
Ferguson Ave
Roeben St
Roeben St
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
1704
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 12 1 1 0 0 7 12 6 0 0 1 15 15 0 0 3 33 3 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 20 2 1 1 0 4 12 8 1 1 3 29 16 1 0 3 41 2 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 18 11 1 0 0 1 9 18 2 0 3 33 8 2 0 1 58 2 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 27 3 15 0 0 11 20 20 0 0 2 46 20 1 0 4 83 4 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 39 16 24 1 0 15 37 8 0 0 4 46 32 0 0 12 58 20 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 33 16 13 0 0 2 14 7 1 0 15 30 32 3 0 9 54 13 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 11 6 2 1 0 1 6 4 0 0 2 24 9 0 0 0 21 3 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 14 3 0 0 0 1 9 4 0 0 2 27 9 1 0 3 41 3 0 TOTAL 0 149 51 50 3 0 37 102 65 4 1 30 217 121 8 0 32 334 45 0 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 16 9 3 0 0 9 12 8 0 0 11 58 32 0 0 3 53 9 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 13 3 4 0 0 2 14 7 0 0 18 61 20 0 0 7 35 8 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 20 2 6 0 0 6 24 4 0 0 14 62 24 1 0 0 44 4 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 21 11 0 0 0 4 8 6 0 0 13 48 25 0 0 3 30 4 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 13 8 2 0 0 3 15 8 0 0 8 82 26 1 0 6 30 13 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 16 9 1 0 0 3 16 2 0 0 15 66 21 0 0 1 32 13 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 14 11 4 0 0 8 15 3 0 0 18 53 36 0 0 6 39 4 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 11 4 2 0 0 7 19 2 0 0 8 59 24 0 0 9 34 8 0 TOTAL 0 106 50 21 0 0 38 106 36 0 0 89 423 180 2 0 31 255 56 2 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 101 40 46 1 0 25 69 45 3 0 22 134 78 6 0 23 218 34 0 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 0 46 28 9 0 0 19 56 14 0 0 42 224 93 1 0 19 116 33 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.776 1.2% PM 14 56 19 0 0.927
PM 0.940 0.1% AM 45 69 25 0 0.668
PHF 0.889 0.824
AM PM
0 0 34 33
42 22 218 116
224 134 23 19
93 78 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.859 0.955 PHF

0.678 0 101 40 46 AM

0.830 0 46 28 9 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Ferguson Ave
Northbound Westbound
Ferguson Ave
Linwood St
Linwood St
Turning Movement Report
Ferguson Ave @ Linwood St
Tulare
Thursday, May 27, 2021 Clear

36.3490
-119.3410
1705
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 4 81 18 0 0 3 97 7 2 0 7 8 4 0 0 34 23 1 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 7 77 13 4 0 2 118 6 0 0 8 20 12 0 0 47 32 7 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 14 99 19 4 0 7 148 12 3 0 7 15 11 1 0 46 43 8 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 14 107 24 1 0 8 170 9 0 0 8 33 12 0 0 46 65 3 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 16 102 33 3 0 15 129 15 3 0 15 22 41 0 0 43 33 13 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 15 107 29 3 0 4 137 13 3 0 9 21 27 2 0 30 29 11 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 3 72 18 3 0 2 112 4 7 0 3 14 9 0 0 32 16 3 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 9 66 18 4 0 0 107 6 1 0 6 13 9 1 0 18 26 3 0 TOTAL 0 72 615 146 22 0 37 881 62 18 0 55 125 108 4 0 255 230 43 0 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 12 142 37 1 0 6 142 4 2 0 14 39 18 0 0 34 47 3 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 15 162 39 3 0 8 123 11 2 0 12 46 7 0 0 27 20 1 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 14 141 30 2 0 3 159 6 3 0 14 47 19 1 0 30 36 6 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 8 151 38 2 0 6 141 7 2 0 12 36 16 0 0 32 23 8 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 18 171 47 1 0 6 140 8 2 0 21 62 12 0 0 25 21 9 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 21 170 53 2 0 11 156 7 2 0 15 43 18 0 0 26 16 7 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 11 164 43 3 0 8 152 13 1 0 13 27 9 0 0 23 39 6 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 14 135 25 2 0 3 106 12 2 0 14 43 9 0 0 27 21 4 0 TOTAL 0 96 1070 270 16 0 44 968 58 16 0 98 298 92 1 0 195 193 39 2 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 51 359 90 11 0 30 505 42 9 0 34 78 78 3 0 143 146 30 0 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 49 568 156 8 0 26 510 30 7 0 52 146 47 0 0 92 86 26 1 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.918 1.5% PM 30 510 26 0 0.943
PM 0.955 0.9% AM 42 505 30 0 0.89
PHF 0.747 0.709
AM PM
0 0 30 26
52 34 146 86
146 78 143 92
47 78 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.806 0.864 PHF

0.954 0 51 359 90 AM

0.920 0 49 568 156 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Ferguson Ave
Northbound Westbound
Ferguson Ave
Demaree St
Demaree St
Turning Movement Report
Ferguson Ave @ Demaree St
Tulare
Thursday, May 27, 2021 Clear

36.3491
-119.3319
1706
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 12 14 59 15 6 1 57 88 8 2 0 4 31 3 3 0 11 34 11 1 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 20 24 59 13 0 1 44 105 21 0 0 11 37 9 0 0 25 41 12 3 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 26 17 77 11 4 1 77 165 37 1 0 10 31 11 1 0 23 51 14 6 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 14 24 90 32 3 1 81 189 51 1 0 11 47 15 0 1 34 68 26 3 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 1 33 110 31 4 1 85 152 39 4 0 25 81 17 0 0 29 52 26 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 10 10 124 43 4 1 62 158 15 0 0 17 53 11 0 0 37 46 30 4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 14 19 75 28 4 2 31 106 8 2 0 7 40 14 2 1 20 24 13 4 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 10 23 73 22 2 1 44 105 9 8 0 8 37 8 1 0 19 30 15 2 TOTAL 98 149 607 177 26 9 437 970 170 17 0 84 325 80 7 2 180 314 135 26 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 15 20 185 46 2 4 52 109 13 2 0 17 89 31 1 0 24 34 31 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 22 19 173 48 1 3 34 129 17 0 1 24 58 20 2 0 25 37 40 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 19 14 176 41 2 0 41 121 7 0 0 23 90 19 0 1 23 42 34 2 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 11 20 165 36 0 3 40 112 12 3 0 23 68 12 0 0 23 22 32 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 22 15 185 37 1 4 41 83 9 0 0 21 99 21 0 0 24 26 46 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 12 20 189 46 0 6 44 90 10 1 0 23 85 12 0 1 30 32 53 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 14 11 190 33 1 4 52 92 4 1 0 30 89 19 0 0 12 42 36 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 14 8 149 26 0 2 42 80 7 1 0 21 91 20 0 0 28 29 40 0 TOTAL 118 115 1283 286 7 25 313 742 71 8 1 165 609 139 3 2 172 240 283 8 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 47 76 365 106 15 4 277 604 129 6 0 57 193 49 1 1 112 197 88 16 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 61 66 635 156 5 10 151 428 44 5 1 79 278 74 3 1 87 123 124 6 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.923 1.6% PM 44 428 151 10 0.953
PM 0.952 0.8% AM 129 604 277 4 0.865
PHF 0.871 0.667
AM PM
1 0 88 124
79 57 197 123
278 193 112 87
74 49 1 1
PM AM
PHF

0.843 0.901 PHF

0.874 47 76 365 106 AM

0.948 61 66 635 156 PM
Turning Movement Report
Goshen Ave @ Akers St
Tulare
Thursday, May 27, 2021 Clear

36.3418
-119.3499

Goshen Ave
Northbound Westbound
Goshen Ave
Akers St
Akers St
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
1707
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 32 1 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 1 0 25 0 0 1 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 23 0 3 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 0 128 2 4 1 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 128 0 0 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 1 0 82 1 3 1 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.780 1.6% PM 0 55 0 0 0.655
PM 0.872 0.0% AM 0 99 0 1 0.694
PHF ##### #####
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF
##### ##### PHF

0.75 1 0 82 1 AM

0.685 0 0 74 0 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Shannon Pkwy
Northbound Westbound
Akers St
Akers St
Turning Movement Report
Akers St @ Shannon Pkwy
Tulare
Tuesday, September 14, 2021 Clear

36.3619
-119.3500
1708
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 61 3 0 0 3 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 1 0 91 9 4 0 1 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 96 2 3 0 3 71 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 2 0 102 7 1 0 6 99 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 1 0 81 12 3 0 2 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 1 0 99 4 1 0 7 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 1 0 70 7 2 0 1 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 54 11 4 0 3 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 TOTAL 6 0 565 48 18 0 24 461 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 22 2
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 97 13 0 0 7 81 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 4 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 70 4 1 0 3 100 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 6 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 87 8 1 0 6 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 7 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 95 6 0 0 11 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 1 0 102 4 0 0 9 108 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 106 8 0 0 8 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 2 0 116 7 2 0 7 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 4 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 1 0 100 7 0 0 1 83 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 2 0 TOTAL 4 0 668 50 4 0 45 648 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 35 0
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 4 0 326 22 8 0 16 261 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 14 2 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 3 0 362 22 2 0 30 341 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 18 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.852 2.4% PM 0 341 30 0 0.909
PM 0.971 0.5% AM 0 261 16 0 0.769
PHF ##### #####
AM PM
0 0 14 18
0 0 0 0
0 0 15 28
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.725 0.821 PHF

0.917 4 0 326 22 AM

0.896 3 0 362 22 PM
Turning Movement Report
Demaree St @ Flagstaff Ave
Tulare
Tuesday, September 14, 2021 Clear

36.3592
-119.3321

Flagstaff Ave
Northbound Westbound
Demaree St
Demaree St
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
1709
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 15 9 3 0 0 4 7 6 2 0 3 23 14 2 0 3 32 3 2 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 20 8 2 2 0 7 12 8 0 0 4 43 12 0 0 9 46 11 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 43 6 12 0 0 8 30 15 1 1 2 32 24 0 0 4 57 8 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 33 8 18 1 1 16 33 21 1 0 3 54 20 0 0 13 80 11 1 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 1 36 20 37 0 0 23 35 8 0 0 8 41 25 2 0 21 74 18 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 1 15 11 12 0 0 2 7 6 0 0 8 47 25 3 0 9 48 11 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 11 8 3 1 0 6 8 9 0 0 8 24 14 1 0 2 30 6 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 13 4 1 0 0 7 4 3 0 0 8 20 13 1 0 0 35 3 0 TOTAL 2 159 64 76 4 1 64 117 66 4 1 40 244 127 9 0 54 347 60 4 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 21 19 8 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 8 62 25 1 0 6 36 8 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 18 7 1 0 0 3 6 6 0 0 9 49 15 0 0 6 34 3 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 9 11 6 0 0 2 13 6 0 0 8 62 26 3 0 7 42 6 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 9 12 3 1 0 6 9 6 1 0 9 60 18 1 0 6 32 9 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 18 6 2 0 0 4 25 6 1 0 9 72 30 0 0 3 37 6 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 22 11 3 0 1 3 9 9 0 0 22 59 35 0 0 8 33 8 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 24 8 2 0 0 2 12 1 0 0 9 54 24 0 0 8 34 9 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 13 9 1 0 0 1 12 7 0 0 11 55 24 0 0 1 37 14 0 TOTAL 0 115 70 24 1 1 25 84 35 2 0 74 410 171 5 0 39 244 55 1 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 2 109 38 67 1 1 43 90 43 2 1 19 149 82 5 0 41 224 40 2 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 50 33 13 1 1 14 49 23 2 0 42 220 94 4 0 21 123 25 1 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.793 1.1% PM 23 49 14 1 0.702
PM 0.917 1.1% AM 43 90 43 1 0.725
PHF 0.89 0.896
AM PM
0 1 40 25
42 19 224 123
220 149 41 21
94 82 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.786 0.899 PHF

0.667 2 109 38 67 AM

0.774 0 50 33 13 PM
Turning Movement Report
Linwood St @ Ferguson Ave
Tulare
Tuesday, September 14, 2021 Clear

36.3491
-119.3410

Ferguson Ave
Northbound Westbound
Ferguson Ave
Linwood St
Linwood St
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
1710
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 8 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 7 2 2 0 2 8 0 1 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 8 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 1 0 16 19 0 2 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 4 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 1 0 12 23 0 2 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 1 0 12 25 0 1 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 6 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6 3 0 16 11 0 1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 8 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 2 0 8 11 0 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 7 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 2 1 0 8 12 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 6 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 14 4 1 0 1 7 1 1 TOTAL 0 44 4 51 5 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 68 29 12 0 65 99 1 9
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 1 9 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 6 1 0 7 7 0 3 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 1 4 0 12 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 15 4 0 0 6 8 1 1 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 4 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 0 0 12 9 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 7 1 0 1 4 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 8 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 0 0 7 6 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 0 0 6 9 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 8 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 9 0 0 6 4 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 TOTAL 2 43 0 75 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 141 35 2 0 40 45 1 4
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 19 1 28 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 16 6 0 48 67 0 6 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 2 22 0 39 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 85 16 2 0 22 25 1 4 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.931 6.9% PM 0 2 0 0 0.25
PM 0.907 2.8% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.743 0.828
AM PM
0 0 0 1
0 0 67 25
85 37 48 22
16 16 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.898 0.667 PHF

0.75 0 19 1 28 AM

0.875 2 22 0 39 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Ave 320
Northbound Westbound
Ave 320
Akers St
Akers St
Turning Movement Report
Ave 320 @ Akers St
Tulare
Wednesday, June 02, 2021 Clear

36.3710
-119.3500
1711
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 1800 30th St, Ste 260
www.metrotrafficdata.com Bakersfield, CA 93301

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 12 60 0 2 0 0 32 6 2 0 8 0 8 2 0 1 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 15 65 1 2 0 0 55 19 2 0 9 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 13 67 0 3 0 0 44 21 2 0 8 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 18 72 0 2 0 0 47 20 3 0 9 0 11 1 0 1 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 12 38 0 0 0 0 46 20 3 0 9 0 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 11 46 0 3 0 1 38 8 2 0 15 0 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 9 36 0 2 0 0 42 8 3 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 7 42 0 3 0 0 43 4 0 0 6 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 82 369 1 17 0 1 299 91 17 0 62 0 62 11 0 4 0 1 0 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 4 46 0 1 0 1 61 6 2 0 11 0 23 1 0 0 1 0 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 9 56 0 1 0 0 56 6 3 0 12 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 9 57 0 0 0 0 55 11 1 0 16 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 3 37 0 0 0 0 58 2 2 0 9 0 38 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 6 45 0 1 0 0 59 7 1 0 13 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 7 47 0 1 0 0 47 8 1 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 4 61 0 0 0 0 39 4 0 0 12 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 6 50 1 1 0 0 49 1 0 0 4 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 43 346 1 5 0 1 367 39 10 0 77 1 140 2 0 1 1 0 1 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 49 210 1 7 0 0 166 68 10 0 31 0 36 6 0 2 0 0 0 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 23 169 0 2 0 1 198 21 8 0 41 0 86 2 0 0 1 0 1 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.914 4.1% PM 21 198 1 0 0.932
PM 0.925 2.4% AM 68 166 0 0 0.929
PHF 0.774 0.931
AM PM
0 0 0 0
41 31 0 1
0 0 2 0
86 36 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.5 0.25 PHF

0.833 0 49 210 1 AM

0.842 0 23 169 0 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Ave 320
Northbound Westbound
Ave 320
Demaree St
Demaree St
Turning Movement Report
Ave 320 @ Demaree St
Tulare
Wednesday, June 02, 2021 Clear

36.3710
-119.3322
1712
Appendix F
Sewer Calculations
1713
July 25, 2023 – Revision 1
City of Visalia, Community Development Department
Paul Bernal, Director
315 E. Acequia Ave.

Visalia, CA 93291
Re: Crandell Subdivision – Biochemical Oxygen Demand and Total Suspended Solids Calculations Mr. Bernal,
We have prepared the calculations below using the best available standards and practices that were able to find. Our Calculations reference a report prepared by Provost and Prichard titled Local Discharge Limits Development, that was prepared for the City of Visalia in March 2012, see Appendix A. We have also utilized the City of Visalia’s Sewer Master Plan, December 2005, to calculate an assumed volume of effluent for the proposed project. See below for the equation that will be utilized to calculate the assumed BOD and TSS that will be generated by the proposed project.

The Crandell Subdivision is a new project being proposed by Wathen Castanos Homes. The project is Located on Demaree Street, North of Riverway Drive. The project is proposing to develop 17.4 Gross Acres of Low Density Residential, 25.4 Gross Acres of Medium Density Residential, and 7.6 Gross Acres of High Density 1714
Residential. Using table 3.4 from the City of Visalia’s Sewer Master Plan, the expected flow rates can be calculated using the Adjusted Flow Coefficients that have been provided.

Land Use Acreage Adjusted Flow Coefficient Expected Flow (GPD) Low Density 17.4 800 13,920
Medium Density 25.4 1300 33,020
High Density 7.6 2000 15,200
Total Expected Flow: 62,140 GPD
Utilizing the equation and coefficients previously provided, we can calculate BOD as Follows:

𝐴𝐻𝐿𝑤𝑑𝑟 =
(8.34)(𝐶𝑤𝑑𝑟)(𝑄𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑓)
(1 − 𝑅𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑓)
Where:

𝐶𝑤𝑑𝑟 = 30
𝑄𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑓 = .062 𝑀𝐺𝐷
𝑅𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑓 = .9881
𝑩𝑶𝑫 = 𝟏𝟑𝟎𝟑. 𝟓𝟔 𝑳𝒃/𝑫𝒂𝒚
Utilizing the equation and coefficients previously provided, we can calculate TSS as Follows 𝐴𝐻𝐿𝑤𝑑𝑟 =
(8.34)(𝐶𝑤𝑑𝑟)(𝑄𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑓)
(1 − 𝑅𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑓)
Where:

𝐶𝑤𝑑𝑟 = 30
𝑄𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑓 = .062 𝑀𝐺𝐷
𝑅𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑓 = .9865
𝑻𝑺𝑺 = 𝟏𝟏𝟒𝟗. 𝟎𝟕 𝑳𝒃/𝑫𝒂𝒚
1715
Please review the calculations provided and if there are any additional questions or information needed, please feel free to contact me at (559)802-3052.

Steven J. Macias, PE
Civil Engineer
1716
Appendix A
1717
Local Discharge Limits Development
Visalia, California
DRAFT
March 16, 2011
Prepared for:

City of Visalia
Prepared by:

Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Clovis, California
1718
COPYRIGHT 2011 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights to this document. This document is not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group In the event of unauthorized reuse of the information contained herein by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group's legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
1719

Local Discharge Limits Development City of Visalia
i
H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 1 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1

1.1 WWTF Information ............................................................................................ 2 2 Pollutants of Concern ............................................................................................... 4

2.1 EPA POCs ........................................................................................................ 4

2.2 Existing Local Limits ......................................................................................... 5

2.3 Waste Discharge Requirement POCs ............................................................... 5

2.4 Other Reasons for POCs .................................................................................. 6

2.4.1 Water Quality Criteria ................................................................................. 6

2.4.2 Biosolids Land Application Criteria ............................................................ 6

2.4.3 Interference and Inhibition Criteria ............................................................. 7

2.4.4 Protection of Treatment Works, Collection System, and Workers ............. 7

2.5 Summary of Controlling Limits .......................................................................... 8

2.6 Evaluation of Existing Data ............................................................................... 9

2.7 Sampling Plan ................................................................................................. 11 3 Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ............................................................. 14

3.1 WWTF Removal Efficiencies ........................................................................... 14

3.2 Discharge Permit and Water Quality AHLs ..................................................... 16

3.3 Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs ...................................................................... 19

3.4 Inhibition Based AHLs ..................................................................................... 20

3.5 POC Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ............................................. 23 4 Designating Local Limits ........................................................................................ 25

4.1 Residential and Background Loadings ............................................................ 26

4.2 Septage Loadings ........................................................................................... 26

4.3 Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings ......................................................... 27

4.3.1 Safety Factor and Growth Allowance ....................................................... 27

4.4 Local Limits Allocations ................................................................................... 27

4.4.1 Uniform Allocation .................................................................................... 27 1720

Local Discharge Limits Development City of Visalia
ii
H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

4.4.2 IU Specific Allocation ............................................................................... 28

4.4.3 The Mass Proportion Allocation ............................................................... 28

4.5 Uniform Allocation of Local Limits ................................................................... 29

4.6 IU Specific Allocation of Local Limits .............................................................. 31

4.7 Comparison of Proposed and Existing Limits .................................................. 32

4.8 Protection of the Treatment Works, Collection System, and Workers ............. 33

4.8.1 Fume Toxicity .......................................................................................... 33

4.8.2 Oil and Grease ......................................................................................... 34

4.9 Public Participation ......................................................................................... 35

4.10 Implementation ............................................................................................... 35 5 Bibliography/References ........................................................................................ 36 APPENDIX A – WWTF Sampling Data
APPENDIX B – Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate Sampling Data APPENDIX C – WWTF Biosolids Data
APPENDIX D – Residential Background Sampling Data
APPENDIX E – Septage Hauler Sampling Data
APPENDIX F – Local Limits Calculations (Uniform Allocation) APPENDIX G – SIU Sampling Data
APPENDIX H – Local Limits Calculations (IU Specific Allocation) 1721

Local Discharge Limits Development City of Visalia
iii
H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc LIST OF TABLES Page
Table ES-1: Local Limits Summary ................................................................................ 1 Table 1-1: Current SIUs ................................................................................................. 1 Table 2-1: EPA POCs .................................................................................................... 4 Table 2-2: Existing Local Limits POCs ........................................................................... 5 Table 2-3: WDR POCs ................................................................................................... 5 Table 2-4: Summary of Controlling Limits ...................................................................... 8 Table 2-5: Pollutants of Concern .................................................................................. 10 Table 2-6: Sampling Plan Information .......................................................................... 12 Table 3-1: Summary of WWTF Removal Efficiencies ................................................... 14 Table 3-2: WDR Based AHLs ....................................................................................... 16 Table 3-3: Water Quality (Chronic) Based AHLs .......................................................... 17 Table 3-4: Water Quality (Agricultural Water Supply) Based AHLs .............................. 18 Table 3-5: Summary of Water Quality Based AHLs ..................................................... 18 Table 3-6: Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs .............................................. 19 Table 3-7: Activated Sludge Inhibition Based AHLs ..................................................... 20 Table 3-8: Trickling Filter Inhibition Based AHLs .......................................................... 21 Table 3-9: Anaerobic Digester Inhibition (Conservative Pollutants) Based AHLs ......... 22 Table 3-10: Anaerobic Digester Inhibition (Non-Conservative Pollutants) Based AHLs22 Table 3-11: Summary Inhibition Based AHLs ............................................................... 23 Table 3-12: Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ................................................ 24 Table 4-1: Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings ........................ 25 Table 4-2: Uniform Allocation of Local Limits ............................................................... 30 Table 4-3: IU Specific Allocation of Local Limits ........................................................... 31 Table 4-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Local Limits .................................... 32 Table 4-5: Fume Toxicity Discharge Screening Levels ................................................ 34 1722

Local Discharge Limits Development City of Visalia
iv
H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

ABBREVIATIONS
ACGIH ................................ American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists AHL ................................................................................... Allowable Headworks Loading BOD ................................................................................... Biochemical Oxygen Demand CFR ...................................................................................... Code of Federal Regulations CTR ................................................................................................ California Toxics Rule EPA ........................................................ United States Environmental Protection Agency FOG .............................................................................................. Fats, Oils, and Grease GPD ........................................................................................................ Gallons Per Day IPP ................................................................................. Industrial Pretreatment Program IU................................................................................................................ Industrial User MAHL ................................................................ Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading MAIL ..................................................................... Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading MGD ............................................................................................. Million Gallons per Day NIOSH ............................................ National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health OSHA ...................................................... Occupational Safety and Health Administration POC .................................................................................................. Pollutant of Concern PPB .......................................................................................................... Parts Per Billion RWQCB ................................................................ Regional Water Quality Control Board SIU ............................................................................................ Significant Industrial User STEL ....................................................................................... Short Term Exposure Limit TSS ............................................................................................. Total Suspended Solids TWA-TLV ............................................. Threshold Limit Value – Time Weighted Average WDR ................................................................................ Waste Discharge Requirements WQ .............................................................................................................. Water Quality WQS ............................................................................................. Water Quality Standard WWTF ............................................................................... Wastewater Treatment Facility * .................................................................................................................... Multiplication 1723

Local Discharge Limits Development City of Visalia
Page ES-1
H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Visalia has an approved Industrial Pretreatment Program. As such, the City is required to maintain and enforce local limits on the significant industrial users that discharge to the City’s wastewater treatment facility. The existing local limits were developed in 1992. The Regional Water Quality Control Board is requiring the City to reevaluate their local limits.

A list of potential pollutants of concern was developed based on available sampling and treatment facility data. A sampling plan was developed and implemented to collect additional data necessary to perform the local limits evaluation. Using the information collected, the local limits were evaluated. The results of this evaluation are summarized in Table ES-1.

Table ES-1: Local Limits Summary
Pollutant Existing Local
Limit
Calculated Local
Limit
Allocation
Method
Proposed Local
Limit
Arsenic 0.05 mg/L 0.05 mg/L Uniform 0.05 mg/L
Boron 1.60 mg/L Not needed None
Cadmium 0.02 mg/L 0.08 mg/L IU Specific 0.02 mg/L
Chromium 3.44 mg/L 5.59 mg/L Uniform 3.44 mg/L
Copper 1.97 mg/L 2.14 mg/L IU Specific 1.97 mg/L
Cyanide 0.16 mg/L 36.97 mg/L IU Specific 0.16 mg/L
Lead 0.30 mg/L 0.48 mg/L IU Specific 0.30 mg/L
Mercury 0.02 mg/L 0.04 mg/L IU Specific 0.02 mg/L
Nickel 2.86 mg/L 5.53 mg/L IU Specific 2.86 mg/L
Silver 0.76 mg/L 12.40 mg/L IU Specific 0.76 mg/L
Zinc 0.64 mg/L 9.12 mg/L IU Specific 0.64 mg/L
Pentachlorophenol 0.15 mg/L Not needed None
Oil & Grease 200 mg/L 609 mg/L Uniform 200 mg/L
BOD5 18,161 lb/day 89,538 lb/day1 Not applicable 18,161 lb/day TSS 41,633 lb/day 41,633 lb/day1 Not applicable 41,633 lb/day 1 Plant design capacity
1724
City of Visalia
SECTION ONE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc 1 INTRODUCTION
The City of Visalia operates a wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) that collects the municipal wastewater generated from the City of Visalia and the Goshen Community Services District. The WWTF treats typical domestic wastes as well as waste generated from commercial and industrial users. Several of the industrial users served by the WWTF meet the definition of a Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) as defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 40 CFR 403.3. SIUs are defined as:
 Industries subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 CFR 403.6 and 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N;
 Any industry discharging an average of 25,000 gallons per day (gpd) or more of process wastewater;
 Any industry that contributes a waste stream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the WWTF; or  Any industry designated by the Control Authority to have a reasonable potential to adversely affect the WWTF’s operation.

Table 1-1 lists the current SIUs and the reason they are considered SIUs.

Table 1-1: Current SIUs
SIU Name SIU Reason SIU Name SIU Reason
Advanced Food
Products
Discharge volume Mission Uniform Discharge volume
Basic Chemical
Solutions
Categorical – 40
CFR 442
Pregis Innovative
Packaging
Potential to
impact WWTF
California Dairies Discharge volume Provisions Food Discharge volume ATC Plastics
(previously Heller
Performance Polymers)
Potential to impact
WWTF
Visalia Custom
Chrome
Categorical – 40
CFR 433
JM Eagle Potential to impact
WWTF
Voltage
Multipliers Inc.

Categorical – 40
CFR 469
Josten’s Print. And
Pub.

Potential to impact
WWTF
Western Milling Potential to
impact WWTF
Kawneer Company Categorical – 40
CFR 433

1725
City of Visalia
SECTION ONE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Due to the fact that there are SIUs discharging to the WWTF, the City of Visalia is required to have an approved Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP). The City’s IPP was approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) on May 5, 1983.

Part of the IPP requirements is the development and implementation of local limits.

Local limits are designed to protect the operations of the WWTF and to ensure that its discharges, whether liquid, solid, or air, comply with State and Federal requirements.

The EPA published the Local Limits Development Guidance document in July 2004.

This document outlines the procedures to develop local limits. In developing local limits the following factors may need to be considered:
 the WWTF’s efficiency in treating and removing pollutants;  the WWTF’s history of complying with the Waste Discharge Requirements;  sludge disposal methods; and
 worker health and safety concerns.

The current local limits were developed in 1992. The purpose of this project is to reevaluate those local limits and investigate the need for stricter or additional local limits.

1.1 WWTF Information
The WWTF treats sewage from the City of Visalia and the community of Goshen. The combined population is approximately 125,000 with a service area of 30 square miles.

The WWTF has a design capacity of 22 million gallons per day (MGD). The average flow for the period of January 2007 to August 2010 was 12.18 MGD, with a maximum one day flow of 14.79 MGD.

Sewage from the main trunklines enters two wet wells prior to entering the headworks of the WWTF. The headworks consists of bar screens. From the headworks, the flow goes to a set of four primary sedimentation basins. From the primary basins, the wastewater is sent to one of four plastic media filled trickling filters. From the trickling filters the water is sent to the aeration basins. The aeration basins precede the secondary sedimentation basins. After the sedimentation basins, the water is chlorinated prior to discharge. The WWTF has the ability to discharge to Mill Creek, agricultural lands, and to onsite percolation ponds. A majority of the flow is discharged to Mill Creek, with the onsite percolation ponds being the discharge point when Mill Creek is not used.

Sludge collected from the primary and secondary treatment processes is thickened in a pair of gravity belt thickeners. After thickening, the sludge is fed to one of six anaerobic digesters. After digestion, liquid from the digesters is discharged to one of two sludge pits for settling of solids. Supernatant from the sludge pits is pumped back to the headworks. The solids from the digesters are pumped to thirty unlined sludge drying 1726
City of Visalia
SECTION ONE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc beds. After 60 to 90 days, the sludge is transferred to an onsite stockpile area. Once per year the stockpiled sludge is land applied to farmland in Merced County.

There are several streams from within the plant that are sent back to the wet wells prior to the headworks for treatment. These recycle streams are gravity thickener filtrate, secondary clarifier scum, supernatant from the sludge pits, decant from the sludge drying beds, and septage waste and chemical toilet waste. The samples obtained for the plant influent include these flows.

The WWTF accepts septage from licensed haulers. The waste from the septage haulers is discharged at a point prior to the headworks to assure treatment by the entire WWTF process. The WWTF accepts approximately 11,599 gallons per day of septage from haulers.

The processes employed in the treatment process will affect certain pollutant local limits due to inhibition levels that can disrupt the treatment process. Additionally, the ability of the WWTF to remove pollutants will affect the local limits. The interference and inhibition values are detailed in Section 2.4.3. The WWTF removal efficiencies are detailed in Section 3.1.
2 POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN
1727
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Pollutants of Concern (POCs) are those pollutants that need to be controlled to protect the WWTF, its workers, and the disposal of the treated wastewater effluent and biosolids. POCs are pollutants that may cause pass through or interference at the WWTF, cause problems in the collection system, or cause problems with the WWTF’s ability to dispose of the generated biosolids.

The following sections discuss the various reasons a pollutant may be included in the list of POCs. There may be numerous reasons to consider a pollutant a POC. The fact that a pollutant is a POC does not mean that a local limit must be developed for it.

Whether a local limit is needed for a POC is discussed in Section 4. If a pollutant is determined to be a POC, data must be collected for it and a detailed evaluation of the POC must be performed.

2.1 EPA POCs
The EPA has established 15 pollutants that are often found in treatment plant effluent and biosolids. The EPA considers these 15 pollutants to be POCs and need to be evaluated as part of any local limits evaluation. These pollutants are listed in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1: EPA POCs
EPA POCs
Arsenic Cadmium
Chromium Copper
Cyanide Lead
Mercury Nickel
Silver Zinc
Molybdenum Selenium
BOD5 Total Suspended
Solids
Ammonia

2.2 Existing Local Limits
The City of Visalia has established local limits for several pollutants. These pollutants are also considered POCs. Table 2-2 lists the pollutants that the City of Visalia currently regulates through a local limit.

Table 2-2: Existing Local Limits POCs
Local Limits POCs
Arsenic Boron
1728
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Cadmium Chromium
Copper Cyanide
Lead Mercury
Nickel Silver
Zinc Pentachlorophenol
Oil & Grease

2.3 Waste Discharge Requirement POCs
On September 21, 2006, the RWQCB issued Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) for the City of Visalia WWTF. The WDR contains pollutant limitations that the WWTF must comply with on the discharge to Mill Creek, the Use Area (agricultural lands), or to the onsite disposal ponds. The pollutants that are regulated on the effluent are considered POCs. Table 2-3 lists the pollutants that have limitations listed in the WDR.

Table 2-3: WDR POCs
WDR POCs
BOD5 TSS
Oil & Grease Chlorides
Lead Ammonia

2.4 Other Reasons for POCs
There are several other reasons that a pollutant may be included on the POC list according to the EPA Guidance Manual, including: water quality criteria, biosolid land application restrictions, and treatment plant inhibitions. There are numerous pollutants that are listed under these criteria. However, to be considered a POC at least one of the following conditions must be met:
 The maximum pollutant concentration in the plant effluent is more than one-half the allowable effluent concentration required to meet a water quality criteria limit;  The maximum pollutant concentration in the sludge is more than one-half the applicable biosolids residual disposal limit;
 The maximum pollutant concentration in a plant influent grab sample is more than one-half the inhibition threshold; or
 The maximum pollutant concentration in a plant influent grab composite sample is more than one-fourth the inhibition threshold.

2.4.1 Water Quality Criteria
1729
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc In the WDR for the WWTF, the RWQCB stated that Mill Creek’s beneficial uses are warm freshwater habitat, water contact recreation, and human health protection (consumption of aquatic organisms only). There is normally no flow in Mill Creek upstream of the WWTF, so the discharge from the WWTF constitutes the flow in Mill Creek. Therefore, there is no dilution of the WWTF effluent in Mill Creek. There are numerous constituents that have limitations based on the beneficial uses in Mill Creek.

Additionally, the State of California has limitations for water used for agricultural uses.

There are numerous constituents that have limitations based on the potential agricultural use of the treated effluent.

For both the beneficial and agricultural use protection, only pollutants in concentrations that are greater than 50% of the water quality standard are considered POCs.

2.4.2 Biosolids Land Application Criteria
The City of Visalia disposes of biosolids by land application. The WWTF must prohibit industrial users from discharging pollutants that could cause a violation of applicable sludge disposal regulations. The national sludge standards are contained in 40 CFR 503. These limitations are based on human health and environmental risks and include numerical pollutant limits, operational standards, management practices, and requirements for sampling, record keeping, and reporting. The State of California has adopted the federal standards in 40 CFR 503. Additionally, the State of California has land application standards set forth in Title 22. The pollutants contained in the 503 and Title 22 regulations are considered for evaluation as a POC. In order to be considered a POC, the maximum pollutant concentration in the sludge must be more than one-half the applicable biosolids residual disposal limit.

2.4.3 Interference and Inhibition Criteria
The pretreatment regulations set forth by the EPA in 40 CFR 403.5(a) state that there must be prohibitions against the discharge of pollutants from an industrial user that may cause interference at the WWTF. Interference, as defined by the EPA, means a discharge that inhibits or disrupts a treatment plant and causes a violation of the WWTF’s WDR or biosolids sludge requirements. The EPA recommends that pollutants be considered POCs if they have caused interference in the past. Based on the City of Visalia WWTF historical data, there have been no pollutants that have caused interference at the plant in the past.

There are certain pollutants that may not cause an effluent discharge or biosolids disposal violation but that may cause disruptions to the WWTF operations. The EPA Local Limits Development Guidance document contains a list of pollutants and inhibition concentrations for various treatment plant processes. The pollutants that have inhibition concentrations are considered POCs if the following criteria have been met:
 The maximum pollutant concentration in a plant influent grab sample is more than one-half the inhibition threshold; or
1730
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc  The maximum pollutant concentration in a plant influent grab composite sample is more than one-fourth the inhibition threshold.

2.4.4 Protection of Treatment Works, Collection System, and Workers Explosive and flammable pollutants can threaten the integrity of the collection system and the health and safety of the WWTF workers. Under the right conditions, the accumulation of such pollutants can produce explosions or fires. Local limits may be needed if these pollutants are expected to be discharged from industrial users.

The fume toxicity levels of certain pollutants indicate the likelihood that a WWTF worker will suffer adverse health effects when the level is approached or exceeded. Volatile organic compound vapors are the major concern because they can be toxic and carcinogenic, and may produce chronic health affects after various periods of exposure.

The EPA Local Limits Development Guidance document list the concentrations for the various exposure levels set forth by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Local limits may be needed if these pollutants are expected to be discharged from industrial users at concentrations that may pose a risk to WWTF workers.

2.5 Summary of Controlling Limits
Based on the criteria discussed in Section 2, several potential pollutants of concern and their associated controlling limit and inhibition limit were tabulated and summarized in Table 2-4.

Table 2-4: Summary of Controlling Limits
Primary Compound
Name
Controlling
Limit (ppb)
Source Inhibition
Criteria (ppb)
Treatment
Process
Ammonia 3,500
Fresh Water Aquatic
4‐day average
(USEPA) 480,000(4) Activated Sludge
Arsenic 100 Agricultural WQ Limit 100(1,2,3) Activated Sludge Boron 700 Agricultural WQ Limit
Cadmium 0.27
Fresh Water Aquatic
4‐day average
(USEPA) 1,000(2,3) Activated Sludge
Chloride 106,000 Agricultural WQ Limit
Chromium VI 1,000(2,3) Activated Sludge
1731
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Copper 9.3
Fresh Water Aquatic
4‐day average (CTR) 1,000(1,2,3) Activated Sludge
Cyanide (total) 5.2
Fresh Water Aquatic
4‐day average (CTR) 100(1,2,3) Activated Sludge
Lead 3.2
Fresh Water Aquatic
4‐day average (CTR) 1,000(3) Activated Sludge
Mercury 100(2,3) Activated Sludge
Molybdenum 10 Agricultural WQ Limit
Nickel 52
Fresh Water Aquatic
4‐day average (CTR) 1,000(2,3) Activated Sludge
Oil and Grease 10,000
Waste Discharge
Requirements
Selenium 5.0
Fresh Water Aquatic
4‐day average (CTR)
Silver 3.8
Fresh Water Aquatic
Instantaneous Max
(USEPA) 13,000(3)
Anaerobic
Digestion
Sodium 69,000 Agricultural WQ Limit
Zinc 120
Fresh Water Aquatic
4‐day average (CTR) 300(3) Activated Sludge
Biochemical Oxygen
Demand (BOD) 30,000
Waste Discharge
Requirements
Primary Compound
Name
Controlling
Limit (ppb)
Source Inhibition
Criteria (ppb)
Treatment
Process
Total Suspended Solids
(TSS) 30,000
Waste Discharge
Requirements
Chloroform 60 Exposure Limits 1,000(2)
Anaerobic
Digestion
Ethylbenzene 1,659 Exposure Limits 200,000(3) Activated Sludge Toluene 2,075 Exposure Limits 200,000(3) Activated Sludge 1) Jenkins, D.I., and Associates. 1984. Impact of Toxics on Treatment Literature Review. 2) Russell, L.L., C.B. Cain, and D.I. Jenkins. 1984. Impacts of Priority Pollutants on Publicly Owned Treated Works Processes: A Literature Review. 1984 Purdue Industrial Waste Conference. 3) Anthony, R.M., and L.H. Briemburst. 1981. Determining Maximum Influent Concentrations of Priority Pollutants for Treatment Plants. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 53(10):1457-1468. 4) U.S. EPA. 1986. Working Document; Interferences at Publicly Owned Treatment Works. September 1986.

2.6 Evaluation of Existing Data
The City of Visalia provided the following data for the local limits evaluation:
 Daily WWTF flow and influent/effluent sampling
1732
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc  WWTF Priority Pollutant scans
 Biosolids sampling
 SIU sampling
 Septage sampling
The sampling data provided above was for the period of January 2007 to September 2010. This data is shown in Appendices A, B, C, and F.

The existing data was compared to the values in Table 2-4 and the criteria in Section

2.5. Table 2-5 lists the pollutants of concern and the reason the pollutant is being considered a POC.
1733
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Table 2-5: Pollutants of Concern
Pollutant Effluent
concentration
more than half of
effluent standard
Sludge
concentration
more than half of
sludge disposal
standard
Influent
concentration
more than 25% of
inhibition
concentration
Required by
EPA
Existing
local limit

BOD X X

TSS X X
Ammonia X
FOG X

Arsenic X X
Boron X
Cadmium X X
Chromium X X X
Copper X X X
Lead X X X
Mercury X X
Molybdenum X X X
Nickel X X
Selenium X X
Silver X X X
Sodium X
Zinc X X X X
Chloride X
Cyanide X X X X
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate X
Pentachlorophenol X
Tetrachloroethene X
Edosulfan II X
Endrin X
Heptachlor X
Bromodichloromethane X
Bromoform X
4,4' DDE X
1734
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

2.7 Sampling Plan
A review of the existing City of Visalia information showed there was additional information needed to complete the local limits evaluation.

The City of Visalia has no recent (last five years) monitoring data for residential or commercial users. A sampling plan was needed to address additional information needed for the evaluation. The residential samples were taken to cover every day of the week over at least a two week period (Week 1 – Monday, Wednesday, Friday, Sunday, Week 2 – Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday). The exact dates were adjusted as needed to fit into existing staff work schedules and the availability of the laboratory to perform the required tests. For the sampling at the WWTF, samples were obtained covering at least two different days. No sampling was performed within 48 hours of a measurable precipitation event. Commercial sampling required only one day of sampling. Table 2-6 lists the pollutants that should be monitored, the location, number of samples, test methods, and the preferred detection limit. Test methods listed are EPA test methods except those beginning with SM, which are Standard Methods test procedures.

Residential Sampling
The residential sampling was conducted to cover geographically diverse areas of the City. Based on the layout of the wastewater collection system the following locations were sampled to provide the residential sampling information:
 Comstock
 Hillsdale
 Evergreen
 Mary and County Center
Commercial Sampling
A majority of the commercial establishments within the City are restaurants. The sampling for the commercial loading was conducted at a commercial shopping area that includes some restaurants. The following location was sampled to represent commercial loading:
 Linwood
 Alley off Court
Treatment Plant
Samples and estimates of flow for the following processes were obtained:
 Plant influent
 Primary effluent
 Secondary effluent prior to chlorination
 Feed to anaerobic digesters
1735
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc  Plant final effluent
Treatment Plant Influent Return Flows
Samples and estimates of flow for the following processes were obtained:
 Scum funnels
 GBT Filtrate
 Supernatant Pit
 SRS (Septage) Station
In addition to the sampling information, the basis-of-design for the treatment plant is needed to ascertain the design loadings for the non-conservative pollutants (ammonia, BOD, and TSS).

Table 2-6: Sampling Plan Information
Pollutant Residential
(seven sampling
events)
Commercial
(one sampling
event)
Treatment
Plant (two
sampling
events)
Treatment Plant
influent return
flow streams
(two sampling
events)
Test
Method
Preferred
Detection
Limit

BOD X X X X SM
5210B
2 mg/L

TSS X X X X SM
2540D
1 mg/L
Ammonia X X X X 350.1 1 mg/L
FOG (HEM) X X X X 1664 10 mg/L

Arsenic X X X 200.8 1 ug/L
Boron X X X 200.7 0.05 mg/L
Cadmium X X X 200.8 0.05 ug/L
Chromium X X X 200.8 1 ug/L
Copper X X X 200.8 2 ug/L
Lead X X X 200.8 0.5 ug/L
Mercury X X X X 1631 0.5 ng/L
Molybdenum X X X 200.8 1 ug/L
Nickel X X X 200.8 1 ug/L
Selenium X X X 200.8 1 ug/L
Silver X X X 200.8 1 ug/L
Pollutant
Residential
(seven sampling
events)
Commercial
(one sampling
event)
Treatment
Plant (two
sampling
Treatment Plant
influent return
flow streams
Test
Method
Preferred
Detection
Limit
1736
City of Visalia
SECTION TWO Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc events) (two sampling
events)
Sodium X X X 200.7 1 mg/L
Zinc X X X 200.8 5 ug/L
Chloride X X X X 300.0 2.0 mg/L
Cyanide X X X SM4500 5 ug/L
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate X X X 625 5 ug/L
Pentachlorophenol X X X 625 10 ug/L
Tetrachloroethene X X X 624 0.5 ug/L
Endosulfan II X X X 608 0.05 ug/L
Endrin X X X 608 0.05 ug/L
Heptachlor X X X 608 0.05 ug/L
Bromodichloromethane X X X 624 0.5 ug/L
Bromoform X X X 624 0.5 ug/L
4,4' DDE X X X 608 0.05 ug/L
1737
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc 3 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEADWORKS LOADINGS
After determining the POCs (Table 2-5) and gathering the additional sampling data, the maximum allowable headworks loadings (MAHLs) can be calculated. The MAHL is the estimated upper limit of a particular pollutant loading to the WWTF intended to prevent pass through or interference. The MAHL for each POC is calculated by the following steps:

1. Calculation of WWTF removal efficiency for the POC;

2. Calculate the allowable headworks loading (AHLs) for the various environmental criteria (such as WDR limits, water quality limits, sludge disposal limits, inhibition values);

3. Designate the MAHL as the most stringent allowable headworks loading for the POC.

3.1 WWTF Removal Efficiencies
Based on the sampling data collected from the City of Visalia WWTF, the removal efficiencies for the POCs were calculated. The removal efficiencies shown in Table 3-1 are the average removal percentages for each POC. The detailed data used to calculate the removal efficiencies is contained in Appendix A. For purposes of calculating the removal efficiencies, any reported concentration that was below the detection limit was assumed to be half the detection limit. Any negative removal efficiencies were assumed to be zero.

Table 3-1: Summary of WWTF Removal Efficiencies
POC Removal Efficiency Number of
Samples
BOD 98.81% 567
TSS 98.65% 919
Ammonia 44% 88
FOG 96% 4
Arsenic 29% 4
Boron 2% 6
Cadmium 67%1 6
Chromium 20% 6
Copper 88% 6
Lead 62% 6
1738
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc POC Removal Efficiency Number of
Samples
Mercury 95% 5
Molybdenum 35% 4
Nickel 37% 6
Selenium 40% 6
Silver 40% 6
Sodium 3% 5
Zinc 79% 6
Chloride 0% 5
Cyanide 69%1 5
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 83% 6
Pentachlorophenol 0%2 6
Tetrachloroethene 0%2 6
Endosulfan II 0%2 4
Endrin 0%2 5
Heptachlor 0%2 5
Bromodichloromethane 0%2 6
Bromoform 0%2 6
4,4’ DDE 0%2 6
1 EPA median removal percentage used since most results were below detection limit.
2 Influent and Effluent samples were all below detection limit.

The sampling plan results showed that for all samples, pentachlorophenol, tetrachloroethene, endosulfan II, endrin, heptachlor, bromodichloromethane, bromoform, and 4,4’ DDE were not present in the influent or effluent of the WWTF.

Therefore, these pollutants were removed from consideration as POCs.

Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected above the detection limit in some of the regular monthly WWTF effluent samples. However, the field blanks obtained during those sampling events showed concentrations greater than the effluent sample values.

This data is shown in Appendix B. Based on this information, the effluent concentrations for bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate are considered to be below the detection limit. Therefore, bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was removed from consideration as a POC.
1739
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc The sampling plan results also showed that the return of WWTF recycle flows to the headworks had a minimal impact on the headworks loading to the WWTF. The return flows are from the scum funnels, GBT filtrate, supernatant pit and the septage receiving station. These flows are estimated to make up approximately 2% of the headworks flow.

3.2 Discharge Permit and Water Quality AHLs
The RWQCB issued the WWTF Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) that regulates the discharge from the plant. The AHL for POCs with WDR limitations is shown in Equation 1.

Equation 1 – AHL based on WDR limits
AHLwdr = (8.34)(Cwdr)(Qwwtf)
(1-Rwwtf)
Where:

AHLwdr = AHL based on WDR limit, lb/day
Cwdr = WDR permit limit, mg/L
Qwwtf = WWTF average flow rate, MGD
Rwwtf = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal

8.34 = Conversion factor
Table 3-2 shows the allowable headworks loading for the POCs based upon the limitations contained in the WDR.

Table 3-2: WDR Based AHLs
WWTF WDR Select Removal Allowable
Pollutant Flow Limit Removal Efficiency Headworks
(MGD) (mg/l) Efficiency (%) (lbs/day)
(Qwwtf) (Cwdr) (from list) (Rwwtf)
Lead 12.18 0.05 User Entered 62.19 13.434
Ammonia 12.18 25 User Entered 43.89 4525.7652
BOD 12.18 30 User Entered 98.81 256354.5218
TSS 12.18 30 User Entered 98.65 226555.1037
The WDR issued does not contain limitations for all the POCs mentioned in Table 2-5.

For the pollutants without limitation in the WDR, the EPA guidance recommends using AHLs based on State or Federal Water Quality Standards. The water quality standards can be based upon short term aquatic life affects (acute) or long term affects (chronic).

Water quality standards can also be based upon human health effects. The human health effects can be from drinking of the water, recreational use of the water, or consumption of aquatic life. According to the WDR, the discharge to Mill Creek is 1740
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc protected for agricultural water supply, water contact and noncontact water recreation, warm freshwater habitat, and groundwater recharge. The criteria used for this comparison is discussed in Section 2.4. The AHL for POCs that have water quality standards is shown in Equation 2.

Equation 2 – AHL based on Water Quality limits
AHLwq = (8.34)[(Cwq)*(Qstr+Qwwtf) – (Cstr*Qstr)]
(1-Rwwtf)
Where:

AHLwq = AHL based on water quality criteria, lb/day
Cwq = State or Federal water quality standard, mg/L
Cstr = Receiving stream background concentration, mg/L
Qwwtf = WWTF average flow rate, MGD
Qstr = Receiving stream (upstream) flow rate, MGD
Rwwtf = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal

8.34 = Conversion factor
The equation allows for instantaneous mixing of the discharge with the receiving stream. Since there is normally no flow in Mill Creek upstream of the WWTF discharge, the receiving stream concentration and receiving stream flow were considered to be zero.

Table 3-3 shows the allowable headworks loading for the POCs based upon the water quality standards.

Table 3-3: Water Quality (Chronic) Based AHLs
WWTF Receiving
Receiving
Stream Chronic Removal Allowable
Pollutant Flow
Stream
Flow Concentration WQS Efficiency Headworks
(MGD) (MGD) (mg/l) (mg/l) (%) (lbs/day)
(Qwwtf) (Qstr1) (Cstr) (Cwq) (Rwwtf)
Arsenic 12.18 0.00 0 0.15000 28.98 21.4539
Cadmium 12.18 0.00 0 0.00027 67.00 0.0831
Copper 12.18 0.00 0 0.00930 88.14 7.9671
Cyanide 12.18 0.00 0 0.00520 69.00 1.7039
Lead 12.18 0.00 0 0.00320 62.19 0.8598
Mercury 12.18 0.00 0 0.00077 95.17 1.6183
Nickel 12.18 0.00 0 0.05200 37.22 8.4145
Selenium 12.18 0.00 0 0.00500 40.26 0.8501
Zinc 12.18 0.00 0 0.12000 79.37 59.0870
Ammonia 12.18 0.00 0 25.00000 43.89 4525.7652
Chloride 12.18 0.00 0 230.00000 0.00 23363.676
1741
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Table 3-4 shows the allowable headworks loading for the POCs based upon the agricultural water supply standards.

Table 3-4: Water Quality (Agricultural Water Supply) Based AHLs WWTF Receiving
Receiving
Stream Agricultural Removal Allowable
Pollutant Flow Stream Flow Conc WQS Efficiency Headworks (MGD) (MGD) (mg/l) (mg/l) (%) (lbs/day)
(Qwwtf) (Qstr2) (Cstr) (Cwq) (Rwwtf)
Arsenic 12.18 0.00 0 0.10000 28.98 14.3026
Molybdenum 12.18 0.00 0 0.01000 35.00 1.5628
Boron 12.18 0.00 0 0.70000 1.85 72.4485
Chloride 12.18 0.00 0 106.00000 0.00 10767.6072
Table 3-5 shows a summary of the water quality based AHLs. The most restrictive (lowest) loading for each POC has been highlighted.

Table 3-5: Summary of Water Quality Based AHLs
Allowable Allowable Allowable Allowable
Pollutant Headworks Headworks Headworks Headworks
(NPDES) (CHRONIC) (ACUTE) (WATER QUALITY)
(lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day)
Arsenic - 23.4539 14.3026 14.3026
Cadmium - 0.0831 - 0.0831
Copper - 7.9671 - 7.9671
Cyanide - 1.7039 - 1.7039
Lead 13.4337 0.8598 - 0.8598
Mercury - 1.6183 - 1.6183
Molybdenum - - 1.5628 1.5628
Nickel - 8.4145 - 8.4145
Selenium - 0.8501 - 0.8501
Zinc - 59.0870 - 59.0870
Ammonia 4525.7652 4525.7652 - 4525.7652
BOD 256354.5218 - - 256354.5218
TSS 226555.1037 - - 226555.1037
Boron - - 72.4485 72.4485
Chloride - 23363.6760 10767.6072 10767.6072
FOG 22573.6000 - - 22573.6000

3.3 Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs
1742
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc The biosolids produced at the treatment plant are eventually land applied. The Federal sludge disposal regulations, 40 CFR Part 503, establish limitations for certain metals that are normally seen in industrial discharges. Additionally, California Title 22 contains additional pollutant limitations on the land application of biosolids. These limitations are converted to AHLs for the POCs using Equation 3.

Equation 3 – AHL based on Biosolids Disposal limits
AHLbsol = (0.0022)(Cbsol)(Qbsol)
(1-Rwwtf)
Where:

AHLbsol = AHL based on biosolids disposal limit, lb/day Cbsol = Biosolids limitation, mg/kg dry sludge
Qbsol = Total sludge flow to disposal, dry metric tons per day Rwwtf = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal

0.0022 = Conversion factor
Table 3-6 shows a summary of the biosolids disposal based AHLs. Where a limitation existed for a pollutant in both 503 and Title 22, the most stringent (lowest) limit is used in the table. Details of the Title 22 land application calculations are contained in Appendix C.

Table 3-6: Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs
WWTF Sludge Flow Land Application Removal Allowable
Pollutant Flow to Disposal Standard Efficiency Headworks (MGD) (MTD) (mg/kg) (%) (lbs/day)
(Qwwtf) (Qbsol) (Cbsol) (Rwwtf) (Lhw)
Arsenic 12.18 4.358636364 41(1) 28.98 1.3568
Cadmium 12.18 4.358636364 17.86074(2) 67.00 0.2556
Chromium 12.18 4.358636364 2833.905(2) 20.41 133.173
Copper 12.18 4.358636364 1500(1) 88.14 16.3185
Lead 12.18 4.358636364 300(1) 62.19 4.6255
Mercury 12.18 4.358636364 17(1) 95.17 0.1713
Molybdenum 12.18 4.358636364 18(1) 35.00 0.4931
Nickel 12.18 4.358636364 420(1) 37.22 10.8190
Selenium 12.18 4.358636364 35.21127(2) 40.26 0.8387
Silver 12.18 4.358636364 566.781(2) 40.42 13.4456
Zinc 12.18 4.358636364 2800(1) 79.37 33.8280
(1)Based on 40 CFR Part 503 regulations.(2)Based on California Title 22 calculations. 1743
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

3.4 Inhibition Based AHLs
Certain pollutant concentrations in wastewater or sludge can cause operational problems for biological treatment processes. The City of Visalia WWTF operates the following biological processes that may be subject to inhibition issues: activated sludge, trickling filters, and anaerobic sludge digestion. The WWTF has not had historical issues with pollutants causing upsets of the biological processes. The EPA guidance document contains inhibition values for pollutants that have the potential to upset biological treatment processes. These inhibition limitations are converted to AHLs for the POCs using Equation 4, Equation 5, and Equation 6.

Equation 4 – AHL based on Activated Sludge Inhibition Values AHLact = (8.34)(Cact)(Qwwtf)
(1-Rprim)
Where:

AHLact = AHL based on activated sludge inhibition, lb/day Cact = Inhibition criterion for activated sludge, mg/L
Qwwtf = WWTF average flow rate, MGD
Rprim = Removal efficiency from headworks to primary treatment effluent, as decimal (assumed using EPA removal values)

8.34 = Conversion factor
Table 3-7 shows the calculated AHLs based on activated sludge inhibition values.

Table 3-7: Activated Sludge Inhibition Based AHLs
WWTF
Activated
Sludge Removal Allowable
User
Entered
Pollutant Flow Inhibition Level Efficiency Headworks Removal (MGD) (mg/l) (%) (lbs/day) Efficiency
(Qwwtf (Cact) (Rprim) (Lhw) (%)
Arsenic 12.18 0.1 91.90 125.4089 91.90
Cadmium 12.18 1 90.00 1015.812 90.00
Chromium 12.18 1 49.30 200.3574 49.30
Copper 12.18 1 96.10 2604.646 96.10
Cyanide 12.18 0.1 90.00 101.5812 90.00
Lead 12.18 1 80.00 507.9060 80.00
Mercury 12.18 0.1 93.20 149.3841 93.20
Nickel 12.18 1 55.20 226.7438 55.20
Zinc 12.18 0.3 96.00 761.8590 96.00
Ammonia 12.18 480 0.00 48758.98 0.00
1744
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Equation 5 – AHL based on Trickling Filter Inhibition Values AHLtric = (8.34)(Ctric)(Qwwtf)
(1-Rprim)
Where:

AHLtric = AHL based on trickling filter inhibition, lb/day Ctric = Inhibition criterion for trickling filters, mg/L Qwwtf = WWTF average flow rate, MGD
Rprim = Removal efficiency from headworks to primary treatment effluent, as decimal (assumed using EPA removal values)

8.34 = Conversion factor
Table 3-8 shows the calculated AHLs based on trickling filter inhibition values.

Table 3-8: Trickling Filter Inhibition Based AHLs
WWTF
Trickling
Filter Select Removal Allowable
EPA
Guidance
Pollutant Flow
Inhibition
Level Removal Efficiency Headworks Removal
(MGD) (mg/l) Efficiency (%) (lbs/day) Efficiency
(Qwwtf) (Ctric) (from list) (Rprim) (Lhw) (%)
Chromium 12.18 3.5
Default (Through
Trick. Fil.) 55.00 790.076 55.00
Cyanide 12.18 30
Default (Through
Trick. Fil.) 59.00 7432.77 59.00
Equation 6 – AHL based on Anaerobic Digestion Inhibition Values (Conservative Pollutants) AHLdig = (8.34)(Cdiginb)(Qdig)
Rwwtf
Where:

AHLdig = AHL based on anaerobic digestion inhibition, lb/day Cdiginb = Inhibition criterion for sludge digester, mg/L Qdig = Sludge flow rate to digester, MGD
Rwwtf = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal

8.34 = Conversion factor
Table 3-9 shows the calculated AHLs based on anaerobic digester inhibition values for conservative pollutants.

Table 3-9: Anaerobic Digester Inhibition (Conservative Pollutants) Based AHLs 1745
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc WWTF Sludge Flow Anaerobic Digester Removal Allowable
Pollutant Flow to Digester Inhibition Level Efficiency Headworks (MGD) (MGD) (mg/l) (%) (lbs/day)
(Qwwtf) (Qdig) (Ccrit) (Rwwtf) (Lhw)
Arsenic 12.18 0.03833 1.6 28.98 1.7651
Cadmium 12.18 0.03833 20 67.00 9.5425
Chromium 12.18 0.03833 130 20.41 203.661
Copper 12.18 0.03833 40 88.14 14.5071
Lead 12.18 0.03833 340 62.19 174.764
Nickel 12.18 0.03833 10 37.22 8.5876
Silver 12.18 0.03833 13 40.42 10.2811
Zinc 12.18 0.03833 400 79.37 161.1051
Equation 7 – AHL based on Anaerobic Digestion Inhibition Values (Non-Conservative Pollutants) AHLdig = (Cdiginb) * Linf
(Cdig)
Where:

AHLdig = AHL based on anaerobic digestion inhibition, lb/day Cdiginb = Inhibition criterion for sludge digester, mg/L Cdig = Existing pollutant level in sludge, mg/L
Linf = WWTF influent loading, lb/day
Table 3-10 shows the calculated AHLs based on anaerobic digester inhibition values for non-conservative pollutants.

Table 3-10: Anaerobic Digester Inhibition (Non-Conservative Pollutants) Based AHLs
WWTF
Average
Influent Average
Digester
Pollutant
Anaerobic
Digester Allowable
Pollutant Flow Conc Influent Load Conc Inhibition Level Headworks (MGD) (mg/l) (lbs/day) (mg/l) (mg/l) (lbs/day)
(Qwwtf) (Linf) (Cdig) (Cdiginb) (Lhw)
Cyanide 12.18 2.50 253.9530 3.73 1 68.0839
Ammonia 12.18 95.50 9701.0046 4214.25 1500 3452.929
Table 3-11 shows a summary of the inhibition based AHLs. The most restrictive (lowest) loading for each POC has been highlighted.

Table 3-11: Summary Inhibition Based AHLs
1746
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Allowable Allowable Allowable Allowable Allowable
Pollutant Headworks Headworks Headworks Headworks Headworks

(ACT.

SLUDGE)
(TRICK.

FILTER)
(DIG. -
CONSERV.)
(DIG. - NONCONS.) (INHIB)
(lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day)
Arsenic 125.4089 - 1.7651 - 1.7651
Cadmium 1015.812 - 9.5425 - 9.5425
Chromium 200.3574 790.0760 203.6605 - 200.3574
Copper 2604.646 - 14.5071 - 14.5071
Cyanide 101.5812 7432.770 - 68.0839 68.0839
Lead 507.9060 - 174.7642 - 174.7642
Mercury 149.3841 - - - 149.384
Nickel 226.7438 - 8.5876 - 8.5876
Silver - - 10.2811 - 10.2811
Zinc 761.8590 - 161.1051 - 161.1051
Ammonia 48758.97 - - 3452.9292 3452.92

3.5 POC Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings
The maximum allowable headworks loading is the lowest of the AHLs calculated for each POC. Influent loadings below the MAHL will lead to compliance with the AHLs based on all environmental and treatment plant criteria. Table 3-12 shows a summary of AHLs as well as the MAHL for each POC.
1747
City of Visalia
SECTION THREE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Table 3-12: Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings
Allowable Allowable Allowable Maximum
Pollutant Headworks Headworks Headworks Allowable
(WATER QUALITY) (INHIBITION) (SLUDGE) Headworks
(lbs/day) (lbs/d) (lbs/d) (MAHL - lbs/d)
Arsenic 14.3026 1.7651 1.3568 1.3568
Cadmium 0.0831 9.5425 0.2556 0.0831
Chromium - 200.3574 133.1733 133.1733
Copper 7.9671 14.5071 16.3185 7.9671
Cyanide 1.7039 68.0839 - 1.7039
Lead 0.8598 174.7642 4.6255 0.8598
Mercury 1.6183 149.3841 0.1713 0.1713
Molybdenum 1.5628 - 0.4931 0.4931
Nickel 8.4145 8.5876 10.8190 8.4145
Selenium 0.8501 - 0.8387 0.8387
Silver - 10.2811 13.4456 10.2811
Zinc 59.0870 161.1051 33.8280 33.8280
Ammonia 4525.7652 3452.9292 - 3452.9292
BOD 256354.5218 - - 256354.5218
TSS 226555.1037 - - 226555.1037
Boron 72.4485 - - 72.4485
Chloride 10767.61 - - 10767.61
FOG 22573.6000 - - 22573.6000
1748
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc 4 DESIGNATING LOCAL LIMITS
After the calculation of the maximum allowable headworks loadings for the POCs, the POCs that require a local limit must be determined. The EPA guidance document recommends developing local limits for those POCs where the average influent loading exceeds 60% of the MAHL. Table 4-1 shows a comparison of MAHLs with the average headworks loadings for each POC. The highlighted POCs are those whose average influent loadings exceed 60% of the MAHL and will be evaluated for local limits.

Table 4-1: Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings Maximum Average Average
Pollutant Allowable Influent Percent
Headworks Loading Loaded
(MAHL - lbs/d) (lbs/day) (%)
Arsenic 1.3568 1.0959 80.7732
Cadmium 0.0831 0.1060 127.5781
Chromium 133.1733 0.4472 0.3358
Copper 7.9671 4.0814 51.2283
Cyanide 1.7039 0.2541 14.9108
Lead 0.8598 0.4302 50.0408
Mercury 0.1713 0.0058 3.3700
Molybdenum 0.4931 0.2642 53.5811
Nickel 8.4145 0.5098 6.0590
Selenium 0.8387 0.0825 9.8349
Silver 10.2811 0.7183 6.9870
Zinc 33.8280 15.8541 46.8668
Ammonia 3452.9292 2471.1932 71.5680
BOD 256354.5218 33233.2884 12.9638
TSS 226555.1037 35048.0272 15.4700
Boron 72.4485 0.1075 0.1483
Chloride 10767.6072 5447.2961 50.5897
FOG 22573.6000 5793.2500 25.6638
Based on the information shown in Table 4-1, there is no local limit necessary for molybdenum, selenium, boron, and chloride. No local limit is necessary for ammonia since a review SIU data for ammonia shows little or no ammonia in the industrial discharge and the influent loading is 71.6% of the MAHL for ammonia. 1749
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

4.1 Residential and Background Loadings
There are many other sources of wastewater to the WWTF besides the regulated industrial user flows. These other sources include domestic (residential) waste, storm water, inflow and infiltration, and commercial dischargers. Because the WWTF does not control the discharges from these sources, the loading contributed from these uncontrolled sources must be deducted from the MAHL to determine the loading available for industrial dischargers.

The City of Visalia has a separated sewer system so storm water is conveyed via a dedicated piping system to minimize the volume of storm water entering the sewer collection system and the WWTF. Additionally, the collection system does not have significant volumes of inflow and infiltration. Therefore, the loadings from storm water and inflow and infiltration to the WWTF are considered to be negligible.

The City of Visalia has performed sampling in residential and commercial areas to determine the expected loadings from these sources. This sampling data is contained in Appendix D. The loading from these sources is calculated by Equation 8.

Equation 8 – Residential and Background Loading Calculation Lunc = (Cunc) * (Qunc) * 8.34
Where:

Lunc = Uncontrolled loading, lb/day
Cunc = Uncontrolled pollutant concentration, mg/L
Qunc = Uncontrolled flow rate, MGD

8.34 = Unit conversion factor

4.2 Septage Loadings
The City of Visalia WWTF accepts septage waste from licensed haulers. Since the septage haulers are not subject to local limits like industrial users, the loading the WWTF receives from septage haulers needs to be subtracted from the MAHLs when determining the loadings available for industrial users. The City of Visalia samples some septage discharges and records the volume of septage received. This septage hauler information is shown in Appendix E. Equation 9 is used to calculate the loading from septage haulers.

Equation 9 – Septage Loading Calculation
Lsep = (Csep) * (Qsep) * 8.34
Where:

Lsep = Septage loading, lb/day
Csep = Septage pollutant concentration, mg/L
Qsep = Septage flow rate, MGD

8.34 = Unit conversion factor
1750
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

4.3 Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings
Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings (MAILs) are the amount of pollutant loadings that the WWTF can receive from controlled sources (permitted industrial users). The MAIL for each pollutant is calculated by Equation 10.

Equation 10 – MAIL Calculation
MAIL = MAHL (1-SF) – (Lunc+SW+GA)
Where:

MAIL = Maximum allowable industrial loading, lb/day
MAHL = Maximum allowable headworks loading, lb/day
SF = Safety factor, decimal
Lunc = Loadings from uncontrolled sources, lb/day
SW = Loadings from septage waste, lb/day
GA = Growth allowance, lb/day

4.3.1 Safety Factor and Growth Allowance
The safety factor is a percentage of the MAHL set aside to account for variability in the data analyzed and other uncertainties. The EPA recommends at least a 10 percent safety factor be used. For the purposes of this local limits study, a 10 percent safety factor will be used for all pollutants.

Growth allowance is a part of the MAHL that can be held reserve to allow for potential growth or expansion within the service area. The growth allowance is normally used for those pollutants that the WWTF was designed to remove, such as BOD, TSS, and ammonia. The City of Visalia does not know of any major growth or expansions to the wastewater collection system. However, five percent will be set aside to allow for any growth that may occur during the life of the local limits. Setting aside the five percent will allow some growth without the need to revise the local limits.

4.4 Local Limits Allocations
There are two common approaches to allocating the available MAIL to the significant industrial users. The two common methods are uniform allocation and Industrial User specific allocation. Different allocation methods can be used for each pollutant.

4.4.1 Uniform Allocation
The uniform allocation method yields one limit per pollutant that will apply to all SIUs.

This allocation method requires that the MAIL for the pollutant be divided by the total flow from all SIUs, even those that do not discharge the pollutant. This method can be overly stringent because some IUs that do not discharge a pollutant will be given an allocation of the MAIL that they may not need. Equation 11 shows the method to calculate a local limit using the uniform allocation method. 1751
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Equation 11 – Uniform Allocation Calculation
Clim = MAIL / [(Qsiu) * 8.34]
Where:

Clim = Uniform concentration limit, mg/L
MAIL = Maximum allowable industrial loading, lb/day
Qsiu = Total flow rate from SIUs, MGD

8.34 = Unit conversion factor

4.4.2 IU Specific Allocation
There are two methods to divide the MAIL for each pollutant among only the SIUs that discharge that particular pollutant. These methods develop SIU-specific discharge limits. Any SIU that discharges at or below the background level is given a background allocation.

The SIU Contributory Flow method is similar to the Uniform Allocation method except that the portion of the MAILs above the background level is divided by the flow rate from those SIUs discharging the pollutant above background. Equation 12 shows the SIU Contributory Flow Allocation calculation.

Equation 12 – SIU Contributory Flow Allocation Calculation Clim = [MAIL – Lback] / [(Qsiupol) * 8.34]
Where:

Clim = Uniform concentration limit, mg/L
MAIL = Maximum allowable industrial loading, lb/day
Lback = Background loading allocation for SIUs for which no contributory flow limit is being established for that pollutant, lb/day Qsiupol = Total flow rate from SIUs discharging the pollutant, MGD

8.34 = Unit conversion factor

4.4.3 The Mass Proportion Allocation
The mass proportion allocation method allocates the MAIL to each SIU in proportion to the SIU’s loading of that pollutant. To calculate the allowable loading for a SIU the portion of the MAIL above background is multiplied by the ratio of the current loading from SIU X to the current total loading of a pollutant from all SIUs. This calculation is shown in Equation 13.

Equation 14 shows the conversion of the mass allocation to a concentration. 1752
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Equation 13 – Mass Proportion Allocation Calculation
LallX = [LcurrX / LcurrT ] * [MAIL - Lback]
Where:

LallX = Allowable loading allocated to SIU X, lb/day
LcurrX = Current loading from SIU X, lb/day
MAIL = Maximum allowable industrial loading, lb/day
Lback = Background loading allocation for SIUs for which no contributory flow limit is being established for that pollutant, lb/day Equation 14 – Mass Proportion Conversion to Concentration Limit ClimX = LallX / [(QX) * 8.34]
Where:

ClimX = Discharge limit for SIU X, mg/L
LallX = Allowable loading allocated to SIU X, lb/day
QX = Flow rate from SIU X, MGD

8.34 = Unit conversion factor

4.5 Uniform Allocation of Local Limits
Table 4-2 is a summary of the collected information and the proposed local limits based on the uniform allocation method. The details of the calculations in Table 4-2 are shown in Appendix F.
1753
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.docTable 4-2: Uniform Allocation of Local Limits Maximum Safety Growth Nonindustrial Nonindustrial Nonindustrial Hauled Waste Hauled Waste Hauled Waste Allowable Local Basis Pollutant Allowable Factor Allowance Concentration Flow Loading Concentration Flow Loading Industrial Limit of Headworks (%) (%) (mg/l) (MGD) (lbs/day) (mg/l) (MGD) (lbs/day) Loading (mg/l) Limitation (MAHL - lbs/d) (SF) (GA) (Cdom) (Qdom) (Ldom) (Chw) (Qhw) (Lhw) (MAIL - lbs/day) (Cind) Arsenic 1.3568 10 10 0.0012 9.887966 0.0998 0.1587 0.011434 0.0151 0.9705 0.0510 SludgeCadmium 0.0831 10 10 0.0001 9.887966 0.0058 0.0383 0.011434 0.0036 0.0571 0.0030 Water QualityChromium 133.1733 10 10 0.0033 9.887966 0.2730 0.2521 0.011434 0.0240 106.2416 5.5857 SludgeCopper 7.9671 10 10 0.0320 9.887966 2.6389 4.2631 0.011434 0.4065 3.3282 0.1750 Water QualityCyanide 1.7039 10 10 0.0009 9.887966 0.0709 0.0000 0.011434 0.0000 1.2922 0.0679 Water QualityLead 0.8598 10 10 0.0014 9.887966 0.1130 0.5129 0.011434 0.0489 0.5259 0.0277 Water QualityMercury 0.1713 10 10 0.0000 9.887966 0.0004 0.0118 0.011434 0.0011 0.1355 0.0071 SludgeMolybdenum 0.4931 10 10 0.0010 9.887966 0.0825 0.0805 0.011434 0.0077 0.3044 0.0160 SludgeNickel 8.4145 10 10 0.0037 9.887966 0.3059 0.2572 0.011434 0.0245 6.4011 0.3365 Water QualitySelenium 0.8387 10 10 0.0006 9.887966 0.0495 0.0390 0.011434 0.0037 0.6178 0.0325 SludgeSilver 10.2811 10 10 0.0001 9.887966 0.0049 0.0035 0.011434 0.0003 8.2196 0.4322 InhibitionZinc 33.8280 10 10 0.1678 9.887966 13.8386 28.7321 0.011434 2.7399 10.4839 0.5512 SludgeAmmonia 3452.9292 10 10 28.4300 9.887966 2344.4980 890.0000 0.011434 84.8700 332.9753 17.5064 InhibitionBOD 256354.5218 10 10 305.68 9.887966 25208.0957 - 0.011434 0.0000 179875.5217 9457.0764 Water QualityTSS 226555.1037 10 10 299.5 9.887966 24698.4581 - 0.011434 0.0000 156545.6248 8230.4914 Water QualityBoron 72.4485 10 10 0.24 9.887966 19.7918 0.0005 0.011434 0.0000 38.1670 2.0067 Water QualityChloride 10767.6072 10 10 56.26 9.887966 4639.5167 650.0000 0.011434 61.9837 3912.5853 205.7068 Water QualityFOG 22573.6000 10 10 76.52 9.887966 6310.2705 1650.0000 0.011434 157.3433 11591.2662 609.4186 Water Quality 1754
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

4.6 IU Specific Allocation of Local Limits
Based on the uniform allocation method, the proposed local limits for some pollutants are significantly lower than the existing local limits. These pollutants are: cadmium, copper, cyanide, lead, mercury, nickel, silver and zinc. The proposed local limits for these pollutants are also significantly lower than the concentrations seen in the discharge from the SIUs. Sampling data for the SIUs is in Appendix G.

The City currently imposes silver local limits for Josten’s Printing and Publishing and Voltage Multipliers of 4.0 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L, respectively. The mass loading associated with these two SIUs was subtracted from the MAIL before it was distributed amongst the remaining silver contributing SIUs.

IU Specific Allocated local limits are meant to be applied to all industrial users regulated by the IPP. In order to provide additional protection, only 80% of the MAIL will be allocated via the IU Specific Allocation method. This will allow an additional amount of safety in the case where an industry that has not historically discharged a pollutant may discharge that pollutant above background concentrations.

Table 4-3 is a summary of the collected information and the proposed local limits based on the IU Specific Allocation method. Details of the IU Specific Allocation calculations are in Appendix H.

Table 4-3: IU Specific Allocation of Local Limits
Pollutant MAIL
(lb/day)
Uncontrolled
Discharge
Conc (mg/L)
Total IU flow
below
Uncontrolled
Conc (MGD)
Lback
(lb/day)
[Unc Conc x
IU flow below
Unc Conc]
Total IU flow
above
Uncontrolled
Conc (MGD)
IU
Specific
Allocation
Local
Limit
(mg/L)
Cadmium 0.0571 0.0001 2.2166 0.00129 0.0643 0.08
Copper 3.3282 0.032 2.164 0.5775 0.1166 2.14
Cyanide 1.2922 0.0009 2.2773 0.0163 0.0033 36.97
Lead 0.5259 0.0014 2.182 0.0249 0.0986 0.48
Mercury 0.1355 4.76x10-6 1.9236 7.64x10-5 0.357 0.04
Nickel 6.4011 0.0037 2.171 0.067 0.1096 5.53
Silver 8.2196 0.0001 2.1763 0.0011 0.0563 12.40
Zinc 10.484 0.1678 2.211 3.0944 0.0696 9.12
1755
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc

4.7 Comparison of Proposed and Existing Limits
Table 4-4 shows a comparison of the proposed local limits to the existing local limits and calculated local limits. Existing local limits for boron and pentachloropenol have been eliminated. Proposed local limits that are greater than the existing local limits are recommended to remain at the existing local limit value to prevent any lessening of local limits. Table 4-4 shows the recommended local limits based upon this evaluation.

Table 4-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Local Limits Pollutant Existing Local
Limit
Calculated Local
Limit
Allocation
Method
Proposed Local
Limit
Arsenic 0.05 mg/L 0.05 mg/L Uniform 0.05 mg/L
Boron 1.60 mg/L Not needed None
Cadmium 0.02 mg/L 0.08 mg/L IU Specific 0.02 mg/L
Chromium 3.44 mg/L 5.59 mg/L Uniform 3.44 mg/L
Copper 1.97 mg/L 2.14 mg/L IU Specific 1.97 mg/L
Cyanide 0.16 mg/L 36.97 mg/L IU Specific 0.16 mg/L
Lead 0.30 mg/L 0.48 mg/L IU Specific 0.30 mg/L
Mercury 0.02 mg/L 0.04 mg/L IU Specific 0.02 mg/L
Nickel 2.86 mg/L 5.53 mg/L IU Specific 2.86 mg/L
Silver1 0.76 mg/L 12.40 mg/L IU Specific 0.76 mg/L
Zinc 0.64 mg/L 9.12 mg/L IU Specific 0.64 mg/L
Pentachlorophenol 0.15 mg/L Not needed None
Oil & Grease 200 mg/L 609 mg/L Uniform 200 mg/L
BOD5 18,161 lb/day 89,538 lb/day2 Not applicable 18,161 lb/day TSS 41,633 lb/day 41,633 lb/day2 Not applicable 41,633 lb/day 1 Josten’s Printing and Voltage Multipliers retain silver limits of 4.0 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L, respectively.
2 Plant design capacity.

4.8 Protection of the Treatment Works, Collection System, and Workers

4.8.1 Fume Toxicity
There are certain pollutants that can cause a fire or explosion, corrosive structural damage at the treatment plant, obstruction of flow, inhibition of biological activity due to heat, or discharges that cause the formation of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes. 1756
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Explosive and flammable pollutants discharged to a WWTF can threaten the integrity of the collection system and the health and safety of the workers. Under the right conditions, the accumulation of such pollutants in treatment works can produce explosions or fires. There are no POCs listed in Table 2-5 that are listed in the EPA Guidance Manual as being potentially explosive.

The fume toxicity level of a pollutant discharged to a WWTF indicates the likelihood that a WWTF worker will suffer an adverse health effect when the level is approached or exceeded. This level can be measured by the time weighted average threshold limit value (TWA-TLV), which is the concentration to which a worker can be exposed for eight hours per day, 40 hours per week and not have any acute or chronic adverse health effects. Similarly, short-term exposure limits (STELs) are concentrations to which a worker should not be exposed for longer than 15 minutes or more than four times per day (with at least one hour between each exposure).

There were three POCs identified in Table 2-4 that have fume toxicity exposure limits that indicate they may create a toxicity exposure issue for collection system workers.

The three POCs were chloroform, ethylbenzene, and toluene. The fume toxicity discharge screening level can be calculated using Equation 15. The discharge screening level is the concentration in the treatment works above which a local limit may be necessary.

Equation 15 – Calculation of Discharge Screening Level
Clvl = Cvap / H
Where:

Clvl = Discharge screening level, mg/L
Cvap = Exposure limit at 1 atm and 25o
C, mg/m3
H = Henry’s Law Constant, (mg/m3)/(mg/L)
Table 4-5: Fume Toxicity Discharge Screening Levels
Pollutant Exposure
limit (mg/m3
)
Henry’s Law
Constant
(mg/m3)/(mg/L)
Discharge
Screening
Level (mg/L)
Maximum
Concentration
Sampled
(mg/L)
Chloroform 9.76 163.5 0.06 0.028
1757
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc Ethylbenzene 542.50 327.0 1.659 <0.0005
Toluene 565.50 272.5 2.075 0.0019
Based on the maximum concentrations sampled in the treatment works and the fume toxicity discharge screening levels, no local limits are needed for chloroform, ethylbenzene or toluene based upon the protection of the treatment works, collection system and workers.

4.8.2 Oil and Grease
Based on the uniform allocation of the oil and grease maximum allowable industrial loading, the local limit would be 669 mg/L. This local limit is based upon protecting the WWTFs ability to meet the WDR oil and grease limitation.

However, by its very nature, grease will adhere to many types of surfaces with sewers especially vulnerable to grease build-up. The cool internal surfaces of sewers provide ideal locations on which thin layers of grease can build up. Over a period of time, clumps of grease will build up to the point that the sewer can be completely choked.

Grease also accumulates due to cooling and dilution of surfactants, that allows the grease to separate and collect on all sewer system surfaces, including wetwells at pump stations, where controls can become fouled and prevent pumps from operating properly.

Based on the residential (background loading) monitoring data, the average background oil and grease concentration is 76.5 mg/L. The average SIU concentration for oil and grease is 133 mg/L. The average oil and grease concentration into the WWTF is 57 mg/L.

The most commonly used local limit for oil & grease is 100 mg/L. The City currently has a limit of 200 mg/L. The 100 mg/L limit is not based upon any empirical evidence but rather on general correlations and an industry consensus that this level limits the build up of oil and grease in the collection system. The federal pretreatment regulations, 40 CFR 403.5(b)(6), prohibit “petroleum oil, non-biodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause interference or pass through.” In most municipalities, oil and grease limits of 100 mg/L to 300 mg/L are protective of the collection system. Limits may need to vary depending on different factors, such as the number of wet wells, type of sewers, slope of sewers, flow in sewers, maintenance of the sewers, and history of grease related clogs.

Based upon the concentrations of oil and grease from residential and industrial sources and the history of grease, the current local limit of 200 mg/L is protective of the collection system and should remain.

4.9 Public Participation
The EPA General Pretreatment Regulations encourages public participation by requiring public notices or hearings for local limits development. The City of Visalia must publish a notice (including a notice for a public hearing) in a newspaper of general 1758
City of Visalia
SECTION FOUR Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc circulation within the jurisdiction served by the WWTF. All comments regarding the proposed local limits as well as any request for a public hearing must be filed with the Approval Authority (the RWQCB) within 30 days. The Approval Authority is required to account for all comments received when deciding whether to approve or deny the proposed local limits. The decision is then provided to the City and other interested parties, and published in the newspaper. All comments received are made available to the public for inspection and copying.

The City should notify the existing SIUs and other interested parties, individually, of the proposed limits and announce a public comment period in the local newspaper. This public comment period can be open while the proposed limits are submitted to the Approval Authority for initial review. During the comment period, the public may present technical challenges to the rationale for a particular local limit.

4.10 Implementation
Upon approval from the RWQCB, the approved limits need to be added to the existing sewer use ordinance. Once integrated in the sewer use ordinance, the approved local limits can be included into the permits issued to the SIUs. 1759
City of Visalia
SECTION FIVE Local Discharge Limits Development

H:\(1) AGENDAS for Council - DO NOT REMOVE\2011\6-20-2011\Item 11q Attachment - Visalia Local Limits Report.doc 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY/REFERENCES
United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Local Limits Development Guidance.

Washington, D.C., July 2004.
1760
APPENDIX A – WWTF Sampling Data
1761
APPENDIX B – Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate Sampling Data 1762
APPENDIX C – WWTF Biosolids Data
1763
APPENDIX D – Residential Background Sampling Data
1764
APPENDIX E – Septage Hauler Sampling Data
1765
APPENDIX F – Local Limits Calculations (Uniform Allocation) 1766
APPENDIX G – SIU Sampling Data
1767
APPENDIX H – Local Limits Calculations (IU Specific Allocation) 1768
Resolution No. 2022-14
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14

A RESOLUTION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
VISALIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION NO. 2022-02

AND DETACHMENT OF PROPERTY FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREA
NO. 1, PERTAINING TO ONE PARCEL TOTALING 59.84-ACRES INTO THE CITY LIMITS OF VISALIA. UPON ANNEXATION, THE SITE SHALL BE ZONED R-1-5 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 5,000 SQ. FT.

MINIMUM), R-M-2 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 3,000 SQ. FT MINIMUM SITE AREA PER DWELLING), R-M-3 (MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL, 1,200 SQ. FT. MINIMUM SITE AREA PER DWELLING),

AND C-N (COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD) WHICH ARE CONSISTENT

WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF

RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY, RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY,
RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY, AND COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.

THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF

NORTH DEMAREE STREET AND WEST PRATT AVENUE WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY OF TULARE (APN: 077-050-018, 019).

WHEREAS, the project proponents approve to initiate proceedings for annexation to said city of territory described on the attached legal description and annexation map included as Attachment “A” of this resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Visalia, after a duly published notice, did hold a public hearing on November 13, 2023, and WHEREAS, the proponent desires to annex said territory to the City of Visalia for the following reasons: 1) The annexation will contribute to and facilitate orderly growth and development of both the City and the territory proposed to be annexed; 2) The annexation will facilitate and contribute to the proper and orderly layout, design and construction of streets, gutters, sanitary and storm sewers and drainage facilities, both within the City and within the territory proposed to be annexed; and 3) The annexation will provide and facilitate proper overall planning and zoning of lands and subdivision of lands in said City and said territory in a manner most conducive of the welfare of said City and said territory; and
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzburg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is located in Voting District 1 as identified in the Election District Map adopted by the City Council on February 22, 2022, per Resolution No. 2022-11; and
1769
Resolution No. 2022-14
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on November 13, 2023, and found it to be consistent with the General Plan; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared which disclosed that environmental impacts are determined to be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation to address significant impacts; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings with regard to the project:

1. That the Annexation is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

2. That the proposed Annexation, which will re-designate 59.84-acres of AE-40 (Agricultural Exclusive, 40-acre minimum site area) County zone district to an R-1-5 (Single Family Residential, 5,000 sq. ft. minimum), R-M-2 (Multi-Family Residential, 3,000 sq. ft minimum site area per dwelling), R-M-3 (Multi-Family Residential, 1,200 sq. ft. minimum site area per dwelling), and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) City zone districts and will not impose new land uses or development that will adversely affect the subject site or adjacent properties.

3. That the parcel is not located within an Agricultural Preserve.

4. That the parcel will be annexed into Voting District 1 per the Council Election Voting District Map.

5. That an Initial Study was prepared for this project, consistent with CEQA, which disclosed that environmental impacts are determined to be not significant and that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39, is hereby adopted. Furthermore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39 prepared for Annexation No. 2022-02, Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22, consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Visalia Environmental Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Visalia recommends approval to the City Council of the Annexation described herein, subject to the following conditions:

1. Upon annexation, the territory shall be zoned R-1-5 (Single Family Residential, 5,000 sq. ft. minimum), R-M-2 (Multi-Family Residential, 3,000 sq. ft minimum site area per dwelling), R-M-3 (Multi-Family Residential, 1,200 sq. ft. minimum site area per 1770
Resolution No. 2022-14
dwelling), and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood), consistent with the pre-zoning designated by the General Plan Land Use Map.

2. That the applicant(s) enter into a Pre-Annexation Agreement with the City which memorializes the required fees, policies, and other conditions applicable to the annexation. The draft Pre-Annexation Agreement is attached herein as Attachment “B” of Resolution No. 2022-14. The agreement is subject to final approval by the City Council of the City of Visalia.
1771

REPORT TO CITY OF VISALIA PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARING DATE: November 13, 2023
PROJECT PLANNER: Cristobal Carrillo, Associate Planner
Phone No.: (559) 713-4443
Email: [email protected]
SUBJECT: Annexation No. 2022-02: A request by 4Creeks, Inc. to annex two parcels totaling approximately 59.84 acres into the city limits of Visalia and to detach said parcels from Tulare County Service Area No. 1. Upon annexation the areas will be zoned R-1-5 (Single Family Residential, 5,000 sq. ft. minimum), R-M-2 (Multi-Family Residential, 3,000 sq. ft minimum site area per dwelling), R-M-3 (Multi-Family Residential, 1,200 sq. ft. minimum site area per dwelling), and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) which are consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designations of Residential Low Density, Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, and Commercial Neighborhood.

Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587: A request by 4Creeks, Inc. to subdivide a 59.84-acre parcel into the following: 159 low-density residential lots on approximately 27.9 acres; 150 medium-density residential lots on approximately 15 acres; an approximately 7.6-acre high-density residential lot that will be developed with a 168-unit multi-family residential complex; and an approximately 7.88-acre Neighborhood Commercial lot which will be developed in the future.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05: A request by 4Creeks, Inc. for a Planned Development consisting of 159 low-density residential lots on approximately 27.9 acres and 150 medium-density residential lots on approximately 15 acres. The proposal will include non-standard lots that will be less than 5,000 square feet in size, with modified setbacks, and non-standard roadway knuckles.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22: A request by 4Creeks, Inc. to establish a 168-unit multi-family residential development on a 7.6 acre parcel within the R-M-3 (Multi-Family Residential, 1,200 sq. ft. minimum site area) Zone.

Project Location: The project site is located at the northwest corner of North Demaree Street and West Pratt Avenue within the jurisdiction of the County of Tulare (APN: 077-050-018, 019).

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Annexation No. 2022-02
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve Annexation No. 2022-02, as conditioned, based on the findings in Resolution No. 2022-14. Staff’s recommendation is based on the conclusion that the request is consistent with the Visalia General Plan.

Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587
Staff recommends approval of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, as conditioned, based on the findings and conditions in Resolution No. 2022-12. Staff’s recommendation is based on the conclusion that the request is consistent with the Visalia General Plan, Zoning and 1772
Subdivision Ordinances, Housing Accountability Act (Government Code section 65589.5) and the Visalia Housing Element.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05
Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-06, as conditioned, based upon the findings and conditions in Resolution No. 2022-13. Staff’s recommendation is based on the conclusion that the request is consistent with the Visalia General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22
Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22, as conditioned, based on the findings and conditions in Resolution No. 2023-32. Staff’s recommendation is based on the conclusion that the request is consistent with the Visalia General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.

RECOMMENDED MOTION
I move to recommend approval of Annexation No. 2022-02, based on the findings and conditions in Resolution No. 2022-14.

I move to approve Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, based on the findings and conditions in Resolution No. 2022-12.

I move to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05, based on the findings and conditions in Resolution No. 2022-13.

I move to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22, based on the findings and conditions in Resolution No. 2023-32.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant, 4Creeks, Inc., representing developer Wathen Castanos Homes, has filed entitlement applications for the development of a 309-lot single-family residential subdivision and a 168-unit multi-family complex, with a 7.51-acre remainder for future commercial use, all on a

59.84-acre parcel located outside of City Limits, within the Tier II Urban Development Boundary (UDB). The project site is currently employed for agricultural use and is listed as prime farmland/farmland of statewide importance. Entitlements for this project consist of an annexation, tentative subdivision map, a conditional use permit for a planned residential development, and a conditional use permit for a 168-unit multi-family complex.

Annexation No. 2022-02 is a request to annex the 59.84-acre parcel into the Visalia City Limits (see Exhibit “B”). Upon annexation, the zoning designation for the project site will be R-1-5 (Single Family Residential, 5,000 sq. ft. minimum), R-M-2 (Multi-Family Residential, 3,000 sq. ft minimum site area per dwelling), R-M-3 (Multi-Family Residential, 1,200 sq. ft. minimum site area per dwelling), and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood), as dictated by the Visalia General Plan land use designations of Residential Low Density, Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, and Commercial Neighborhood (see Exhibit J”).

Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 is a request to subdivide the 59.84-acre parcel into a 309-lot single-family residential subdivision (see Exhibit “A”), with a 7.6-acre lot for a 168- unit multi-family complex and a 7.51-acre parcel for future commercial development. Per the Phasing Plan in Exhibit “D”, the development will occur over five phases, with single-family residential development occurring in Phases 1 through 3.

The developer has identified that 159 single-family lots will be developed within the Low-Density Residential/R-1-5 portion of the project site (i.e., the Madison Collection), comprising a density of

5.7 dwelling units per acre. Lots within this portion of the development will be under the minimum lot size for the R-1-5 Zone, averaging 4,186 square feet in size. The remaining 150 single-family 1773
lots will be developed within the Medium-Density Residential/R-M-2 portion of the project site (i.e., the Ariette Collection), comprising a density of 10 dwelling units per acre. Lots within this portion of the development will average 3,199 square feet in size, though many lots within this area will be under the 3,000 square feet minimum lot size required for the R-M-2 land use designations.

The density of the subdivision will be consistent with the density ranges of the Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential General Plan land use classifications, which note density ranges between 2 to 10 units per acre and 10-15 units per acre respectively. The development will contain standard public streets with modified curvilinear knuckles, landscape outlots, 11 outlots for park/open space use, a walking trail along the existing Modoc Ditch, and additional amenities. Outlots will be maintained by a Landscape and Lighting District (LLD).

In order to allow deviation from Visalia Municipal Code standards for lots within the R-1-5 and RM-2 Zones, the subdivision proposal is accompanied by a request for a Planned Residential Development via Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05. Per Zoning Ordinance Chapter 17.26, deviations from normal zoning regulations and standards may be requested if it can be shown that the deviations maximize benefits to the eventual residents of a planned residential development. The Conditional Use Permit request details several deviations from VMC standards, listed below as follows:
• Lot size. The minimum lot size in the R-1-5 Zone is 5,000 square feet, and 3,000 square feet within the R-M-2 Zone. Within the R-1-5 portion of the development, the applicant is proposing lots averaging 4,186 square feet in size, ranging from 2,680 square feet to 7,736 square feet in discrepancy. Approximately 96% of the R-1-5 lots will be less than the zones minimum lot size.

For R-M-2 portion of the development, the applicant proposes lots averaging 3,199 square feet in size, ranging from 2,678 square feet to 8,373 square feet. Approximately 80% of the R-M-2 lots will be less than the zones minimum lot size. • Setbacks. Both the R-1-5 and R-M-2 Zones require a 15-foot front yard (22 feet for garages), 5-foot side yards, 10-foot street side yards, and a 25-foot rear yard. Per Exhibit “F” the applicant requests a reduction to all setbacks, listed below as follows.

COMPARISON OF SETBACK STANDARDS (MADISON COLLECTION, LOTS 1 - 100) Front Yard Side Yard Street
Side
Yard
Rear Yard Garage
EXISTING R-1-5 SETBACKS 15 5 10 25 22
PROPOSED SETBACKS 10 5 10 10 20
COMPARISON OF SETBACK STANDARDS (ARIETTE COLLECTION, LOTS 101 - 309) Front
Yard
Side Yard Street
Side
Yard
Rear
Yard
Garage
EXISTING R-M-2 SETBACKS 15 5 10 25 22
PROPOSED SETBACKS 10 3 and 5, with larger side yard
to be adjacent to garage for
trash receptable storage.
10 10 20
1774
• Non-Standard Roadway Design. The applicant proposes non-standard roadway knuckles (see Exhibit “G”), removing the “bulb out” feature, in order to provide additional rear and front yard area for cul-de-sac lots within the R-M-2 portion of the subdivision.

Per the project narrative in Exhibit “J”, amenities will be provided to occupants of the subdivision, to include walking trails along the Modoc Ditch, which traverses the project site, and 11 pocket parks located throughout, averaging 0.21 acres in size, and ranging from 0.03 acres to 0.68 acres.

Parks would contain a mix of amenities, including playgrounds, benches, half-basketball courts, picnic-table areas, pedestrian loops, pet stations, and open space lawns. The “Ariette” units will contain exterior ornamentation on all four sides, in a variety of designs, while the “Madison” units will contain only street-facing ornamentation (see Exhibit “H”).

Lastly, Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22 is a request to allow development of a 168-unit multi-family development on a 7.51-acre parcel within in the R-M-3 zone (see Exhibit “C”). The development will be located at the northwest corner of the project site, abutting single family residences to the east, and future commercial development to the south. The project density of the multi-family component of the overall project is 22 units per acre which is consistent with the density range of the High-Density Residential land use designation (15 to 35 units per acre).

The multi-family development will consist of fourteen 12-plex residential buildings and a centrally located club house. The residential buildings will be three-stories tall and feature minimal mission style architectural elements (see Exhibit “H”). Units will range in size from 793 square foot one bed / one bath dwellings to 1,212 square foot two bed / two bath dwellings, with an individual garage provided for each unit. The multi-family development will include a total of 274 parking spaces, 168 of which will be covered garages, thereby meeting the 1.5 parking stall requirement for one and two-bedroom units. The development will also include additional amenities in the form of a swimming pool, fitness room, dedicated open space areas, and pedestrian connectivity to the pocket parks within the main Belissa subdivision and future commercial uses to the south.

The overall development will be serviced by 60-foot-wide local streets with City standard curb and gutter, and modified knuckles in the R-M-2 portion of the subdivision. Additional improvements proposed include installation of a temporary stormwater basin on the 7.51-acre commercial site, streetlights, sewer lines, storm drainage, and public infrastructure such as electricity, gas, and water. Additional public street improvements will be conducted to North Linwood Street, a Collector Street, which will be widened to 42 feet within the boundaries of the subdivision, and North Demaree Street, a Minor Arterial which will be widened to 42 feet, again within the boundaries of the subdivision. A portion of West Riverway Avenue, existing as a Minor Arterial street east of this project, will also be improved as a local street within the project boundaries to provide access from the south. Areas of West Shannon Parkway Way and North Linwood Street adjacent to the 7.51 remainder parcel are depicted but will not be improved until such time as the remainder is developed. Lastly, improvements will be conducted to the Modoc Ditch, which traverses the middle portion of the project site. Improvements will include the widening of existing service roads to 15 feet on each side. Details for the proposed road improvements can be found in the site plan in Exhibit “A” and street/ditch cross sections in Exhibit “G”.

Primary access to Phase I of the subdivision will be from North Demaree Street, with additional access provided along West Riverway Avenue and North Chinowth Street. Phases 2 and 3 will also maintain access to Demaree, Riverway, and Chinowth via connection to local roads within Phase 1. Development of Phase 4 will provide access to North Linwood Street, providing superblock connectivity. Improvements along Demaree, Riverway, and Linwood will include 1775
construction of curb, gutter, sidewalks, block walls (where lots do not front onto roadways), installation of park strip landscaping, streetlights, sanitary sewer, and undergrounding of utility lines. The street improvements associated with this subdivision are discussed in greater detail in the Street Improvements section of the report below.

The subdivision map will create 16 lettered outlots to be maintained by the LLD. The outlots will provide a variety of functions, including use as a trail pathway, landscaping lots with block walls, canal with maintenance roads, and pocket parks. The outlots account for approximately 3.66 acres of the total 59.84-acre development.

The applicant has provided floor plans and elevations for the single-family developments associated with the overall project. The Madison Collection (Lots 1 through 100) features seven different master plans, each with three different exterior treatment options. The Ariette Collection (Lots 101 through 309) contains five different master plans, each also with three different exterior treatment options. Ariette plans are all two-story units ranging in size from 1,553 square feet to 2,044 square feet of livable space. Madison plans contain a mix of single and two-story dwellings, ranging in size from 1,671 square feet to 3,152 square feet (see Exhibits “H” and “I”).

The parcel is surrounded by agricultural land in all directions, with the Shannon Ranch subdivision to the east, and Wild Horse Ranch subdivision to the south. The project site, and areas to the north, east, and west are currently outside City Limits and under the jurisdiction of the County of Tulare.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
General Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density, Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, and Commercial
Neighborhood
Future City Zoning: R-1-5 (Single Family Residential, 5,000 sq. ft. minimum), R-M-2 (Multi-Family Residential, 3,000 sq. ft minimum site area per dwelling), R-M-3 (Multi-Family
Residential, 1,200 sq. ft. minimum site area per
dwelling), and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood)
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: North: Tulare County Jurisdiction, AE-40 (Exclusive Agricultural Zone, 40 acre minimum) /
agricultural land
South: R-1-5, R-M-2 / Wild Horse Ranch subdivision,
agricultural land
East: Tulare County Jurisdiction, AE-20 (Exclusive
Agricultural Zone, 20 acre minimum), AE-40 /
Shannon Ranch subdivision, agricultural land
West: Tulare County jurisdiction, AE-40 / agricultural
land
1776
Environmental Review: Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022- 39 Special Districts: None
Site Plan Review: SPR No. 2021-116 (Subdivision), 2021-141 (Multifamily Development)

RELATED PLANS & POLICIES
Please see attached summary of related plans and policies.

SIMILAR PROJECTS
On May 9, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approve Annexation No. 2021-03, and approved Higgins Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5585 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2022-01. The project was a request to annex and subdivide a 32.35-acre parcel into 174-lots for residential use consistent with the R-1-5 Zone.

On June 12, 2023, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approve Annexation No. 2022-05, and approved Pearl Woods Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5591 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2023-07. The project was a request to annex and subdivide a 67.70-acre parcel into 273-lots for residential use consistent with the R-1-5 Zone.

On June 26, 2023, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approve Annexation No. 2022-03, and approved Barr and Wood Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5588, Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-06, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2022-02. The project was a request to annex and subdivide a 69.35-acre parcel into 136 lots for residential use in the R-1-20 (Single Family Residential, 20,000 sq. ft. minimum site area) Zone.

PROJECT EVALUATION
Staff supports the annexation based on the project’s consistency with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Specifically, Annexation No. 2022-02 will facilitate a residential subdivision development on a 59.84-acre site in a manner that is consistent with residential neighborhoods in the area. Furthermore, staff recommends approval of Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22 based on the project’s consistency with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, Housing Accountability Act (Government Code section 65589.5), and the Visalia Housing Element. The subdivision map proposes to develop a parcel of land that is designated for residential development at a density prescribed in the 2030 Visalia General Plan.

Furthermore, the project is providing housing that meets the City’s Regional Housing Needs for the moderate-income level.

Annexation
The project proponents have filed an application to initiate the annexation of the 59.84-acre project site into the Visalia City Limits. Annexation is required for the City to apply its land use jurisdictional rules and regulations. The Annexation is supported on the basis that the proposed use is consistent with Visalia General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-P-21, which allows for the annexation and development of residential land to occur within the Tier II Urban Development Boundary when it is consistent with the City’s Land Use Diagram. The site will be pre-zoned to R1-5, R-M-2, R-M-3, and C-N classifications, consistent with the subject sites General Plan land 1777
use designations of Residential Low Density, Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, and Commercial Neighborhood.

The site will have access to requisite utility and infrastructure services, which will be readily available for connection upon development of the project. Though the project is not currently within City Limits, the applicant has submitted a Tentative Subdivision Map and two Conditional Use Permits to be considered along with the annexation request. Cities have the authority to approve tentative map proposals prior to final approval of an annexation by a local agency formation commission (LAFCO). However, “final maps” for such applications cannot be approved until after an annexation is completed and recorded through the Tulare County Recorder. Staff have included this requirement as Condition No. 6 for Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587.

General Plan Consistency
Land Use Element Policies
The project is consistent with Visalia General Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-P-21, which states that the city should “Allow annexation and development of residential, commercial, regional retail, and industrial land to occur within the Urban Development Boundary (Tier II) consistent with the City’s Land Use Diagram”. The proposed site is within the County of Tulare and is adjacent to and consistent with existing developed residential sites to the south and east. Existing utility infrastructure (i.e., water, sewer, and stormwater) can be provided to accommodate the project at buildout. Furthermore, the site is located within the Tier II UDB, which allows for immediate development of a project site upon its successful annexation. Note the City of Visalia met General Plan residential land use thresholds for expansion into the Tier 2 UDB in July 2021.

Low Density Residential
The project is consistent with Policy LU-P-55, which allows for residential development consistent with the Low-Density Residential designation at a density range between 2 to 10 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed development within the Low-Density Residential portion of the project site will be developed at a residential density of 5.7 units per acre, consistent with the General Plan land use designation and R-1-5 zoning district. The policy is intended to facilitate “...single-family detached housing with densities typical of single-family subdivisions.” The policy also supports the development of “…small-lot detached housing…as part of Low-Density Residential developments [with] development standards [that] will ensure that a desirable singlefamily neighborhood character is maintained.” Medium Density Residential
The project is also consistent with Policy LU-P-56, which allows for residential development consistent with the Medium-Density Residential designation at a density range between 10 to 15 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed development within the Medium-Density Residential portion of the project site will be developed at a residential density of 10 units per acre, consistent with the General Plan land use designation and R-M-2 zoning district. This policy is intended to “...accommodate a mix of housing types including small-lot single-family…on infill lots or new development areas within walking distance of neighborhood nodes and corridors.” The policy further notes that “Development standards will ensure that new development contributes positively to the larger community environment. Projects on sites larger than five acres or involving more than 60 units will require discretionary review.” All aspects of the project related to Medium Density Residential development comply with this policy.
1778
High Density Residential
Lastly, the project is consistent with Policy LU-P-57, which allows for residential development consistent with the High-Density Residential designation at a density range between 15 to 35 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed multi-family development within the High-Density Residential portion of the project site will be developed at a residential density of 22 units per acre, consistent with the General Plan land use designation and R-M-3 zoning district. The policy is intended to facilitate high density residential development “…for some infill sites and new areas in close proximity to neighborhood centers and major transportation routes.” The policy further notes that “High Density Residential development may also be permitted in infill areas where it can be made to be consistent with adjacent properties through the conditional use permit process [with] development standards [that] ensure that new development contributes positively to the creation of neighborhood nodes or districts.” The multi-family component of the project, situated as it is on a new site, near existing and future commercial centers, and Riggin Avenue/Demaree Street transportation routes, meets the intended purpose of the policy. Processing through a conditional use permit also ensures that the development will contribute positively to the existing and proposed residential development surrounding the multi-family complex.

Neighborhood Commercial
Though no commercial development is proposed with this submittal, the proposal nevertheless complies with aspects of Policy LU-P-67, which allows for development consistent with the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation. The policy calls for Neighborhood Commercial designations to accommodate “…small-scale commercial development that primarily serves surrounding residential areas.” Placement of single and multi-family residential uses in close proximity to the future neighborhood commercial area ensures compliance with the state goals of the policy.

Taken as a whole, the proposal meets the intent of the identified General Plan policies, providing a development compatible with residential areas to the south and east, at densities supported by the General Plan, and adjacent to transportation routes and existing/future commercial hubs.

Development Standard Deviations
The proposed subdivision does not meet all codified standards contained in the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The applicant proposes lot sizes and setbacks that are smaller than what is required under the R-1-5 and R-M-2 Zones, as well as proposing a modified knuckle within the small-lot portion of the project. To address this, the applicant has submitted a Conditional Use Permit request for a Planned Residential Development, to permit deviations from Zoning Ordinance standards. The deviations are discussed in the Planned Residential Development section of this report below. As it stands, the proposal meets the intent of the Low-Density and Medium Density Residential land use designations. The proposed deviations will still result in a development within the density limits of the land use designation, with larger, more compatible, lot sizes adjacent to existing single-family residential areas to the south.

Housing Accountability Act (Government Code section 66589.5) The Housing Accountability Act (HAA) requires local agencies to approve housing developments that are consistent with applicable general plan, zoning, and subdivision standards, including design review, if they were in effect at the time that the housing development application was deemed complete. A local agency cannot disapprove a project or lower its density unless it finds 1779
by a preponderance of the evidence that the project would have a specific, adverse impact on public health or safety, and that there is no feasible way to mitigate or avoid the impact1.

With approval of the attached Conditional Use Permit/Planned Residential Development, the project is consistent, compliant, and in conformity with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and single-family residential development standards. The lots proposed for the Belissa subdivision meet density standards for the Low-Density, Medium Density, and High Density Residential land use designations and will be compatible with surrounding developed residential areas.

Furthermore, the subdivision will develop a network of local streets and improve adjacent Collector and Arterial public roadways, thereby facilitating increased street connectivity to accommodate future growth in the vicinity.

Traffic Impact Analysis
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for the proposed project (ref.: Traffic Study: Crandell Tentative Subdivision. Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers, March 202, Revised June 2022). The purpose of the study is to analyze traffic conditions related to the development of the subdivision and its projected level of service (LOS) at opening year and at various increments, and the corresponding environmental impact as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The TIA analyzed existing and proposed intersections within a one-mile radius of the project site.

The existing and new intersections studied are as follows:
• Akers Street & Avenue 320
• Demaree Street & Avenue 320
• Demaree Street & Pratt Road
• County Center Street & Pratt Rd
• Mooney Boulevard & Pratt Avenue
• Akers Street & Shannon Parkway
• Chinowth Street & Shannon Parkway
• Demaree Street & River Way Drive
• Demaree Street & Shannon Parkway
• County Center Street & Shannon
Parkway
• Demaree Street & Flagstaff Avenue
• Akers Street & Riggin Avenue
• Linwood Street & Riggin Avenue
• Demaree Street & Riggin Avenue
• County Center Street & Riggin Avenue
• Linwood Street & Ferguson Avenue
• Demaree Street & Ferguson Avenue
• Also included are the driveways for the
multi-family and retail portions of the
project.

The TIA determined that the proposed project would cause unacceptable LOS at four separate intersections. Affected Intersections and the improvements needed to maintain or improve the operational level of service of the street system in the vicinity of the project are identified below:

Intersection Improvements Required
by 2031
Improvements Required
by 2041
Demaree Street & Shannon Parkway Signal
Demaree Street & Flagstaff Avenue Signal
1 Gov. Code Section 65589.5(j)(1).
1780
Linwood Street & Riggin Avenue Signal
County Center Street & Riggin Avenue Signal
The City of Visalia Traffic Impact Fee facilities list includes signal projects which are not individually identified. Three of the four intersections (excluding Demaree Street and Flagstaff Avenue) are arterial or collector roadways and are understood to be included in the traffic impact fee. The intersection of Demaree Street and Flagstaff Avenue is currently a full access intersection but will require signalization in the future with or without the project.

The project will pay approximately $3.1 million in traffic impact fees (utilizing the City’s current fee schedule) meeting its fair share of contributions to the required future traffic signal projects. With fair share payments, there will be a less than significant impact from the project on existing or proposed intersections.

City of Visalia Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Thresholds and Implementation Guidelines Senate Bill (SB) 743, signed in 2013, changes the way transportation studies are conducted in California CEQA documents. Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) replaces motorist delay and level of service (LOS) as the metric for impact determination. As a result of the final rulemaking surrounding SB 743 and the implementation deadline of July 1, 2020, the City of Visalia adopted VMT thresholds and guidelines (City of Visalia VMT Thresholds and Implementation Guidelines, LSA, Adopted March 15, 2021) to address the shift from delay‐based LOS CEQA traffic analyses to VMT CEQA traffic analyses.

The adopted guidelines provide details on appropriate “screening thresholds” that can be used to identify when a proposed land use project is anticipated to result in a less-than-significant impact without conducting a more detailed VMT analysis. Screening thresholds include:

1. Residential and office projects within a Transit Priority Area.

2. Locally serving retail projects up to 50,000 square feet.

3. Residential, office, or mixed‐use projects within low‐VMT generating areas.

4. 100 percent affordable housing projects.

5. Projects that are consistent with the City’s General Plan and generating fewer than 1,000 daily trips.

A land use project need only meet one of the above screening thresholds to result in a less than significant impact.

The project will result in the addition of 309 single-family residential units and 168 multi-family units, resulting in an increase of population for the City. A rise in population for the area would result in an increased amount of VMT being produced. However, by using the City of Visalia online VMT screening application, the project was determined to be located in TAZ 1694. Utilizing the service population metric due to being a mixed-use project, the average VMT was determined to be 20.33 miles. The average VMT per service population for Tulare County is 29.0. Therefore, the project is determined to be in a low VMT zone, meeting the criteria for screening threshold No. 3 identified above. As a result, the project will result in a less than significant transportation impact.
1781
Street Improvements
The developer of the subdivision will be required to construct major street improvements along North Linwood Street and North Demaree Street, with additional minor improvements to West Riverway Avenue. Improvements along the subdivision frontage for these major streets consist primarily of widening to their ultimate right-of-way design.

Street Widening
North Linwood Street is a designated 84-foot-wide collector roadway. The project will require a 42-foot dedication and widening of the street along the western boundary of the project site to accommodate the eventual development of two travel lanes, two bike lanes, on-street parking areas, and a street median if sufficient right-of-way is available. North Demaree Street is a designated 84-foot-wide Minor Arterial roadway that will similarly require a 42-foot dedication and widening of the street. Widening will occur along the eastern boundary of the project site to accommodate the eventual development of two travel lanes, two bike lanes, and on-street parking areas, with the potential for a street median if sufficient right-of-way is available. Finally, West Riverway Avenue has been designated as a 60-foot-wide local roadway. Per the subdivision map, only a small portion of Riverway Avenue will be improved, along the southern boundary of the project site. The street will require a 42-foot dedication, tapering to 30 feet at its westernmost point where it will intersect with a local street (Galliard Street). In order to accommodate the West Riverway connection to Galliard St, the project will need to provide for two lanes of traffic, which may require the acquisition of offsite right of way. Note that per Engineering Division comments for Site Plan Review No. 2021-166, improvements to Demaree and Linwood Streets are identified in the City’s Circulation Element and Transportation Impact Fee program, making portions of the required street widening reimbursable.

Improvements along the right of way within the boundaries of the subdivision map shall include curb, gutter, sidewalks, streetlights, block walls, and landscaping. All improvements will be maintained by an LLD. All new utilities that will service the residential subdivision will be placed underground. Per the Phasing Plan in Exhibit “D”, widening of Demaree Street and Riverway Avenue will occur during Phase 1 of the development. Improvements to Linwood Street along the multi-family development would be completed with Phase 4 of the project. Improvements to the remainder of Linwood Street, as well Shannon Parkway along the southern boundary of the project site, will be installed upon development of the 7.51 Neighborhood Commercial parcel (i.e.

Phase 5). Any such project will require review and coordination with City staff prior to development.

Local Streets
The subdivision proposes 60-foot-wide City standard local streets providing access to Demaree Street, Riverway Avenue, and Linwood Street. Improvements also include extension of North Chinowth Street from the Wild Horse Ranch subdivision, extending northward through the project site, with a stub provided for potential connection to a future subdivision to the north. As part of its extension, North Chinowth Street will transition from its existing 52-foot-width within the Wild Horse Ranch subdivision, to a 60-foot width, in conformance with the current 60-foot-wide local road standard. The street connections proposed with the subdivision will serve to improve circulation for the general area.

Solid Waste/Fire Department Service
During the Site Plan Review process, concerns were identified by the Solid Waste Division and Fire Department regarding the maneuvering of solid waste and fire vehicles around the proposed modified knuckles within the small lot portion of the subdivision. The following recommendations 1782
were provided by Solid Waste and Fire staff to address the issues, and have been incorporated into the conditions of approval for Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587:
• Condition No. 10 - That the local streets within Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 shall be kept free and clear of vehicles on trash pick-up days. Signage shall be placed throughout the subdivision informing residents of this requirement. • Condition No. 11 – That the curvilinear non-standard roadway knuckles within the small lot portion of Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 shall be painted red to prevent onstreet parking of vehicles.

Planned Residential Development
The applicant has submitted a Conditional Use Permit request for a Planned Residential Development (PRD) to allow deviations from R-1-5 and R-M-2 Zone development standards.

Proposed deviations are for reduced lot sizes, reduced setbacks, and non-standard roadway designs in the form of modified cul-de-sac knuckles.

Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Chapter 17.26 (Planned Development), development standards may be deviated from in order to maximize the benefits derived from unique projects that could not otherwise be accommodated by adherence to Visalia Municipal Code standards. The proposed modifications can be supported on the basis that the resulting buildable lots, as conditioned, will be fully functional without undue intrusion or conflict with adjacent residences, there will be sufficient open space provided throughout the subdivision to accommodate the needs of residents, and because lots adjacent to typical single-family residential development is consistent with the development pattern and residential density of the adjacent areas. The applicant also proposes additional architectural ornamentation for residences built within the small-lot subdivision located in the Medium Density Residential portion of the project site (Note:
this is further discussed in the “Building Elevations/Floor Plans” section of this report).

Furthermore, lots within both the Low Density and Medium Density land use areas will be at densities well within the ranges required by each classification. At 5.7 units to the acre the Low Density Residential portion of the development is at the mid-range of the 2 to 10 units per acre density range of the Low-Density Residential land use designation. The 10 units to the acre density range proposed for the Medium Density Residential portion of the project site is similarly within the 10 to 15 unit density range of the Medium Density Residential land use designation.

Setback and street knuckle reductions are supported because sufficient open space is provided throughout the subdivision, in the form of pocket parks and trails. Additional, reduced setbacks permit the development small lots that nevertheless contain adequate space for the development of two to three bedroom units.

Agricultural Preservation Ordinance
The 59.84-acre project site is in the City’s Tier II urban development boundary and is designated as Prime Farmland as defined per the Tulare County Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program.

As a result, the development of this site is subject to the City’s recently adopted Agricultural Preservation Ordinance.

On May 15, 2023, the City Council approved the second and final reading of Ordinance No. 2023- 02, which adopts an addition to the Visalia Municipal Code (VMC) referred to as Title 18 “Agricultural Land Preservation”, Chapter 18.04 “Agricultural Land Preservation Program”. This code creates an Agricultural Preservation Ordinance (APO) to implement Visalia General Plan Land Use Policy LU-P-34.
1783
The APO established a process for the required preservation of agricultural land through the acquisition of agricultural conservation easements or the payment of an in-lieu fee for projects subject to the provisions of the ordinance.

The developer of the project is subject to complying with the requirements of the adopted APO since the site is located with the Tier II urban development boundary. The preserved land obligation shall be calculated at a ratio of one acre of preserved land for each acre of converted land. Converted land acreage shall be calculated by determining the applicable project acreage less the acreage of exclusions. In addition, the preserved land obligation, as established in VMC Section 18.04.070(A), shall be preserved through acquisition of an agricultural easement in accordance with VMC Section 18.04.080, unless eligible for payment of an in-lieu fee in accordance with VMC Section 18.04.090.

The preserved land obligation shall be satisfied prior to issuance of any permit directly authorizing or resulting in disturbance to the project site. Compliance of the ordinance is achieved when either the approved agricultural conservation easement has been recorded or the applicant has remitted the approved in-lieu fee to the qualified entity.

Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
A Landscaping and Lighting District (LLD) will be required for the long-term maintenance of the outlots, which includes the pocket parks, block walls, streetlights, landscaping, and all park amenities as noted on the subdivision map in Exhibit “A”.

The block walls along street frontages will be typical City standard block walls. The subdivision map block wall heights will be reduced to three feet where the block wall runs adjacent to the front yard setback areas. The three-foot transition areas are applicable for the corner residential lots within the subdivision. Staff has included this requirement as Tentative Subdivision Map Condition of Approval No. 5.

Outlots for Parks and Canal
The project delineates eleven outlots for use as pocket parks, and two outlots for canal use.

Details for the outlots are as follows:
• Pocket Parks: Approximately 2.2 acres of the project site will be devoted to pocket parks, to be located throughout the proposed subdivision. The parks are intended to provide open space amenities to residents of the small lot subdivision. The park will contain several amenities for private use by residents including trails, play equipment, basketball courts, picnic areas, and open space lawns.
• Canal: The existing Modoc Ditch runs along the eastern portion of the project site. Outlots Q and R will be dedicated to the City and serve as lots to contain the canal. The lots will be approximately 50 feet wide to accommodate the placement of 15 food wide maintenance roads on either side of the canal. Areas of Outlots Q and R that are adjacent to residential lots will be separated by wood fencing.

Infrastructure
The project will require improvements to the following infrastructure:
• Water Service: Staff has included Condition No. 8 for Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, Condition No. 11 for Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-06, and Condition No. 11 for Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22, which requires a valid Will Serve Letter from the California Water Service Company if, prior to development of the subdivision and/or multifamily complex, the determination of water availability letter lapses. 1784
• Sanitary Sewer: The sewer system will have to be extended to the boundaries of the development where future connection and extension is anticipated. The sewer system will be sized in order to service the entire subdivision. The developer will be required to coordinate with City staff on design and construction requirements for the sanitary sewer.

The sanitary sewer master plan for the entire development will be required to be submitted for review prior to approval of any portion of the system. • Storm Drainage: Per Exhibit “A”, the subdivision will incorporate a temporary stormwater basin located on the remainder lot. The map also notes that Outlot P, which provides pedestrian access from the subdivision to the remainder parcel, may be employed to provide a storm drain connection to the temporary stormwater basin. Storm water and storm drainage facilities, and any necessary changes thereof, will be facilitated between the applicant and City during civil design to ensure compliance with the City storm drain master plan (currently in draft form).
• Canal: Development of local roadways for the Belissa Subdivision will necessitate the installation of a culvert crossing for the Modoc Ditch. Site Plan Review comments from the Engineering Division require coordination with the City, Modoc Ditch Company, and developer for installation of the culvert crossing.
• Emergency Access: Engineering Division and Fire Department staff have provided comment noting that a secondary emergency access shall be provided at Lots 238 and 239 of the subdivision if the multi-family development will not contain fire sprinklers. This is included as Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 Condition of Approval No. 9. • Multi-family Drive Approach: Engineering Division staff also note that the northernmost drive approach along the western boundary of the proposed multi-family development does not meet the 200-foot minimum separation requirement from the Linwood Street/Coburn Avenue intersection. Compliance with this requirement is included as Condition No. 10 of Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22.

Infrastructure improvements are codified via Condition No. 1 of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, Condition No. 2 of Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05, and Condition No. 2 of Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22.

Building Elevations/Floor Plans
Building elevations and floor plans for the development are included in Exhibits “H” and “I”. Per the submittal, Ariette plans are all two-story units ranging in size from 1,553 square feet to 2,044 square feet of livable space. Madison plans contain a mix of single and two-story dwellings, ranging in size from 1,671 square feet to 3,152 square feet.

The proposed street facing façades of the Madison units will feature a mix of modern, farmhouse, and Spanish style architectural ornamentation, such as batten siding, shutters, mission tile roofing, and decorative vents. Ariette units will contains similar architectural elements, but will incorporate additional ornamentation onto non-street facing building exteriors in the form of shutters and foam trim around windows.

As a Planned Unit Development, the Visalia Municipal Code encourages maximizing benefits to future residents of the subdivision. To that effect, staff recommends the inclusion of Condition of Approval No. 9 for Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05, requiring that the Madison units contain exterior ornamentation on the rear and side yards of all two-story units. This will increase compatibility with the Ariette units, which contain ornamentation on all four building exteriors, and improve the visual aesthetic of the development as a whole. 1785
Consistency with the exterior elevations will be enforced through the Building Permit process.

Good Neighbor Policies and Management and Maintenance Standards The 168-unit multi-family complex is subject to the City’s Good Neighbor Policies (GNPs) for multifamily residential development. The GNPs are a set of management and maintenance requirements that address the common maintenance of buildings and grounds. The GNPs prohibit the storage of boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles over one ton outside of carports, and require all buildings, mechanical equipment, and grounds to be maintained in good working order and in a neat and orderly fashion.

To ensure that these requirements are addressed and are consistent with the conditions placed on the subject multi-family complex, staff recommends that management and maintenance conditions be included as a part of the multi-family conditional use permit, via Condition No. 9 of Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22. Among the recommended conditions are 24-hour availability for Visalia Police Department to maintenance and/or management staff. Maintenance and management staff shall either be on-site or available by telephone at all times, with phone numbers to be provided to the Police Department dispatch center.

Subdivision Map Act
California Government Code Section 66474 lists seven findings for which a legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a tentative map if it is able to make any of these findings.

These seven “negative” findings have come to light through a recent California Court of Appeal decision (Spring Valley Association v. City of Victorville) that has clarified the scope of findings that a city or county must make when approving a tentative map under the California Subdivision Map Act.

Staff has reviewed the seven findings for a cause of denial and finds that none of the findings can be made for the proposed project. The seven findings and staff’s analysis are below.

Recommended findings in response to this Government Code section are included in the recommended findings for the approval of the tentative subdivision and tentative parcel map.

GC Section 66474 Finding Analysis
(a) That the proposed map is not consistent with
applicable general and specific plans as specified in
Section 65451.

The proposed map has been found to be consistent
with the City’s General Plan. This is included as
recommended Finding No. 1 of the Tentative
Subdivision Map. There are no specific plans
applicable to the proposed map.
(b) That the design or improvement of the proposed
subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The proposed design and improvement of the map
has been found to be consistent with the City’s
General Plan. This is included as recommended
Finding No. 1 of the Tentative Subdivision Map.

There are no specific plans applicable to the
proposed map.
(c) That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.

The site is physically suitable for the proposed map
and its affiliated development plan, which is
designated as Residential Low Density, Residential
Medium Density, Residential High Density, and
Commercial Neighborhood and developed at a
density of 5.7 units per acre for the Low Density
1786
Residential portion of the project site, 10 units per
acre for the Medium Density Residential portion of
the project site, and 22 units to the acre for the High Density Residential portion of the project site. This
is included as recommended Finding No. 3 of the
Tentative Subdivision Map.
(d) That the site is not physically suitable for the
proposed density of development.

The site is physically suitable for the proposed map
and its affiliated development plan, which is
designated as Residential Low Density, Residential
Medium Density, Residential High Density, and
Commercial Neighborhood. This is included as
recommended Finding No. 4 of the Tentative
Subdivision Map.
(e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements are likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

The proposed design and improvements of the map
have not been found likely to cause environmental
damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat. This finding is further
supported by the project’s determination of no new
effects under the Guidelines for the Implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
included as recommended Finding No. 8 of the
Tentative Subdivision and Tentative Parcel Maps.
(f) That the design of the subdivision or type of
improvements is likely to cause serious public health
problems.

The proposed design of the map has been found to
not cause serious public health problems. This is
included as recommended Finding No. 2 of the
Tentative Subdivision Map.
(g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of
improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by
the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

The proposed design of the map does not conflict
with any existing or proposed easements located
on or adjacent to the subject property. This is
included as recommended Finding No. 5 of the
Tentative Subdivision Map.

Environmental Review
An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were prepared for the proposed project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39 disclosed that environmental impacts are determined to be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation to address significant impacts to the following resources:
• One mitigation measure pertaining to Agriculture and Forest Resources to mitigate impacts for loss of Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance on a 1:1 ratio. • Three mitigation measures pertaining to Cultural Resources and Tribal and Cultural Resources to reduce the impacts of the Project on the potential of exposing historical or archaeological materials during construction.
• Three mitigation measures pertaining to Hydrology and Water Quality to address impacts to surface and groundwater resources.
• One mitigation measure pertaining to Air Quality to address impacts to air quality from 1787
development and operational activity.
• Four mitigation measures, with several sub-mitigations, pertaining to Biological Resources to reduce impacts of the Project to special-status wildlife species (i.e. California tiger salamander, Hoover’s spurge, San Joaquin kit fox, San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass, Swainson’s hawk, Vernal pool fairy shrimp, and Western yellow-billed cuckoo) to a level that would be less than significant.

A 20-day review and comment period through the State Clearing House for the Initial Study began on August 10, 2023, and ended on August 29, 2023.

No formal comments were received as of the publication of this report. With the mitigation incorporated into the project, staff concludes that Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39 adequately analyzes and addresses the proposed project and reduces environmental impacts to a less than significant level.

RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
Annexation No. 2022-02

1. That the Annexation is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

2. That the proposed Annexation, which will re-designate 59.84-acres of AE-40 (Agricultural Exclusive, 40-acre minimum site area) County zone district to an R-1-5 (Single Family Residential, 5,000 sq. ft. minimum), R-M-2 (Multi-Family Residential, 3,000 sq. ft minimum site area per dwelling), R-M-3 (Multi-Family Residential, 1,200 sq. ft. minimum site area per dwelling), and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) City zone districts and will not impose new land uses or development that will adversely affect the subject site or adjacent properties.

3. That the parcel is not located within an Agricultural Preserve.

4. That the parcel will be annexed into Voting District 1 per the Council Election Voting District Map.

5. That an Initial Study was prepared for this project, consistent with CEQA, which disclosed that environmental impacts are determined to be not significant and that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39, is hereby adopted. Furthermore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587

1. That the proposed location and layout of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, its improvements and design, and the conditions under which it will be maintained are consistent with the policies and intent of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance.

The 59.84-acre project site, which is the site of the proposed 309-lot single-family residential subdivision, 168-unit multi-family complex, and 7.51-acre Neighborhood Commercial remainder, is consistent with Land Use Policy LU-P-21 of the General Plan. Policy LU-P-21 allows for the “annexation and development of residential, commercial, regional retail, and industrial land to occur within the Urban Development Boundary (Tier II) consistent with the City’s Land Use Diagram”.

2. That the proposed Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, its improvements and design, and the conditions under which it will be maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, 1788
safety, or welfare, nor materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, nor is it likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed tentative subdivision map will be compatible with adjacent land uses. The project site is bordered by existing residential development, and arterial/collector streets.

3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed tentative subdivision map. The Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 is consistent with the intent of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance, and is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is adjacent to land zoned for residential development, and the subdivision establishes an arterial, collector, and local street pattern that will serve the subject site and the future development of vacant parcels located to the north, east, and west of the subject site.

4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed tentative subdivision map and the project’s density, which is consistent with the underlying Residential Low Density, Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, and Commercial Neighborhood General Plan Land Use Designations. The proposed location and layout of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, its improvement and design, and the conditions under which it will be maintained is consistent with the policies and intent of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance. The 59.84-acre project site, which is the site of the proposed 309-lot single-family residential subdivision, 168-unit multi-family development, and 7.51-acre Neighborhood Commercial remainder, is consistent with Land Use Policy LU-P-21.

5. That the proposed Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The 309-lot subdivision and 168-unit multi-family complex are designed to comply with the City’s Engineering Improvement Standards for major streets. The development of the site with a 309-lot subdivision and 168-unit multi-family complex will improve arterial and collector streets (North Demaree Street, North Linwood Street, and West Riverway Avenue), and extend local streets, infrastructure improvements, utilities, right-of-way improvements and a residential lot pattern consistent with existing residential development found in the area.

6. The proposed location of the tentative subdivision map is in accordance with the Visalia General Plan and the objectives of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The proposed location of the subdivision is in accordance with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zones in which the site is located. Multiple General Plan policies identify the implementation of development standards to ensure that new single-family residential development will contribute to positive land use compatibility. The size of the property combined with the number of residential lots proposed is consistent and compatible with existing surrounding residential development.

The proposed project will result in the creation of 159 single-family lots within the Low-Density Residential/R-1-5 portion of the project site, comprising a density of 5.7 dwelling units per acre, the creation of 150 single-family lots within the Medium-Density Residential/R-M-2 portion of the project site comprising a density of 10 dwelling units per acre, and the creation of 168 multi-family units within the High-Density Residential/R-M-3 portion of the project site comprising 22 dwelling units per acre, and one 7.51 acre remainder lot, which are all consistent with General Plan land use designations of Residential Low Density, Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, Neighborhood Commercial, and their corresponding zonings designations of R-1-5, R-M-2, R-M-3, and C-N that will be applied to the site when annexed into the city limits.
1789

7. The Housing Accountability Act (GC section 66589.5) requires local agencies to approve housing developments that are consistent with applicable, objective general plan, zoning, and subdivision standards in effect at the time that the housing development project’s application is determined to be complete. A local agency cannot disapprove a project or lower its density unless it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the project would have a specific, adverse impact on public health or safety, and there is no feasible way to mitigate or avoid the impact. There is no evidence that the project would cause quantifiable significant unavoidable impacts on public health and safety. The project is consistent, compliant, and in conformity with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and development standards.

8. That an Initial Study was prepared for this project, consistent with CEQA, which disclosed that environmental impacts are determined to be not significant and that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39, is hereby adopted. Furthermore, the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22

1. That the proposed project, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

2. That the proposed conditional use permit is consistent with the policies and intent of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, the project is consistent with the required findings of Zoning Ordinance Section 17.38.110:
a. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The proposed modifications to the R-1-5 and R-M-3 zone standards result in buildable lots, as conditioned, that will be fully functional without undue intrusion or conflict with adjacent residences, and which are consistent with the development pattern and residential density of the surrounding area. The 5.7 units per acre density range of the project site within the Low Density Residential land use designation, the 10 units per acre density range of the project site within the Medium Density Residential land use designation, and the 22 unit per acre density range of the project within the High Density Residential land use designation, are all in keeping with the respective Low, Medium, and High Density Residential land use designations and assist in maximizing the lands usage. Setback reductions maintain typical residential standards and dwelling sizes and are offset by the inclusion of pocket parks with amenities placed throughout the subdivision. Furthermore, local streets and infrastructure to be installed shall maintain adequate circulation throughout the site, providing access to amenities within and outside of the development. b. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed tentative subdivision map and multi-family complex will be compatible with adjacent residential land uses and will improve circulation in the area via improvements to adjacent arterial and collector streets.
c. That the proposed project is consistent with the policies and intent of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance The project specifically supports General Plan Land Use policies related to efficient land use absorption (Policy LU-P-21, LU-P-55, LU-P-56, LU-P-57, and LU-P-67).
1790

3. That an Initial Study was prepared for this project, consistent with CEQA, which disclosed that environmental impacts are determined to be not significant and that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39, is hereby adopted. Furthermore, the design of the subdivision, multifamily development, and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
Annexation No. 2022-02

1. Upon annexation, the territory shall be zoned R-1-5 (Single Family Residential, 5,000 sq. ft. minimum), R-M-2 (Multi-Family Residential, 3,000 sq. ft minimum site area per dwelling), RM-3 (Multi-Family Residential, 1,200 sq. ft. minimum site area per dwelling), and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood), consistent with the pre-zoning designated by the General Plan Land Use Map.

2. That the applicant(s) enter into a Pre-Annexation Agreement with the City which memorializes the required fees, policies, and other conditions applicable to the annexation. The draft PreAnnexation Agreement is attached herein as Attachment “B” of Resolution No. 2022-14. The agreement is subject to final approval by the City Council of the City of Visalia.

Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587

1. That the subdivision map be developed in substantial compliance with the comments and conditions of the Site Plan Review Committee as set forth under Site Plan Review No. 2021- 116 and Site Plan Review No. 2021-141, incorporated herein by reference.

2. That the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 be prepared in substantial compliance with the subdivision map in Exhibit “A”.

3. That setbacks for the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No 5587 shall be as follows:

SETBACK STANDARDS (MADISON COLLECTION, LOTS 1 - 100)
Front Yard Side Yard Street Side
Yard
Rear Yard Garage
EXISTING R-1-5 SETBACKS 15 5 10 25 22
PROPOSED SETBACKS 10 5 10 10 20
SETBACK STANDARDS (ARIETTE COLLECTION, LOTS 101 - 309)
Front
Yard
Side Yard Street
Side
Yard
Rear
Yard
Garage
EXISTING R-M-2 SETBACKS 15 5 10 25 22
PROPOSED SETBACKS 10 3 and 5, with larger side yard to be adjacent to garage for trash
receptable storage.
10 10 20

4. That the block walls located within the Landscape and Lighting District lots shall transition to three-foot height within the 15-foot front yard setback areas of the adjoining residential lots of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 (Exhibit “A”).

5. That approval of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 shall not become effective unless Annexation No. 2022-02, placing the project site within the corporate limits of the City of Visalia, is approved by the Tulare County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), 1791
and is fully executed to include all conditions contained in the Pre-Annexation Agreement for Annexation No. 2022-02.

6. That prior to the issuance of any residential building permit on the site, the applicant / developer shall obtain and provide the City with a valid Will Serve Letter from the California Water Service Company.

7. That the mitigation measures found within the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39 are hereby incorporated as conditions of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587.

8. That the project be developed in substantial compliance with all improvements depicted and described in Exhibits “A” through “J”.

9. That a secondary emergency access shall be provided at Lots 238 and 239 of the subdivision if the multi-family development will not contain fire sprinklers.

10.That the local streets within Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 shall be kept free and clear of vehicles on trash pick-up days. Signage shall be placed throughout the subdivision informing residents of this requirement.

11.That the curvilinear non-standard roadway knuckles within the small lot portion of Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 shall be painted red to prevent on-street parking of vehicles.

12.That all applicable federal, state, regional, and city policies and ordinances be met.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05

1. That the planned residential development be prepared in substantial compliance with Exhibit “A”, which incorporates a total of 309 single-family residential units and related public and private infrastructure.

2. That the subdivision map be developed in substantial compliance with the comments and conditions of the Site Plan Review Committee as set forth under Site Plan Review No. 2021- 116 and Site Plan Review No. 2021-141, incorporated herein by reference.

3. That the project be developed in substantial compliance with all improvements depicted and described in Exhibits “A” through “J”.

4. That Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 shall be approved, and that requirements of the use permit which relate to this map shall be fulfilled.

5. That the timeline for the lapse of this Conditional Use Permit shall be tied to the timeline for the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587.

6. That setbacks for the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No 5587 shall be as follows:

SETBACK STANDARDS (MADISON COLLECTION, LOTS 1 - 100)
Front Yard Side Yard Street
Side
Yard
Rear Yard Garage
EXISTING R-1-5 SETBACKS 15 5 10 25 22
PROPOSED SETBACKS 10 5 10 10 20
1792
SETBACK STANDARDS (ARIETTE COLLECTION, LOTS 101 - 309)
Front
Yard
Side Yard Street
Side
Yard
Rear
Yard
Garage
EXISTING R-M-2 SETBACKS 15 5 10 25 22
PROPOSED SETBACKS 10 3 and 5, with larger side yard to
be adjacent to garage for trash
receptable storage.
10 10 20

7. That prior to the issuance of any residential building permit on the site, the applicant / developer shall obtain and provide the City with a valid Will Serve Letter from the California Water Service Company.

8. That the mitigation measures found within the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39 are hereby incorporated as conditions of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587.

9. That the Madison units (Lots 1 through 100) included additional exterior ornamentation on the rear and side yards of all two-story units.

10.That all applicable federal, state, regional, and city policies and ordinances be met.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22

1. That the project be developed in substantial compliance with the comments and conditions of the Site Plan Review Committee as set forth under Site Plan Review No. 2021-116 and Site Plan Review No. 2021-141, incorporated herein by reference.

2. That the project be developed in substantial compliance with all improvements depicted and described in Exhibits “A” through “J”.

3. That the timeline for the lapse of this Conditional Use Permit shall be tied to the timeline for the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587.

4. That prior to the issuance of any residential building permit on the site, the applicant / developer shall obtain and provide the City with a valid Will Serve Letter from the California Water Service Company.

5. That the mitigation measures found within the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39 are hereby incorporated as conditions of the Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587.

6. That the community building, pool with spa, park area, and open space shall be installed as a part of the development and maintained in good working/accessible order.

7. That landscape and irrigation plans, prepared in accordance with the City of Visalia Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), shall be included in the construction document plans submitted for either grading or building construction permits. Prior to the project receiving final approved permits, a signed Certificate of Compliance stating that the project meets MWELO standards shall be submitted to the City.

8. That a valid will-serve letter for the providing of domestic water service be obtained for the development prior to development.

9. That the owner/operator(s) of all multiple family residential units shall be subject to the following conditions:
1793
A. Maintenance and Operations
i. All development standards, City codes, and ordinances shall be continuously met for this apartment/residential complex. Buildings and premises, including paint/siding, roofs, windows, fences, parking lots, and landscaping shall be kept in good repair. Premises shall be kept free of junk, debris. ii. Provide a regular program for the control of infestation by insects, rodents, and other pests at the initiation of the tenancy and control infestation during the tenancy.
iii. Where the condition is attributable to normal wear and tear, make repairs and arrangements necessary to put and keep the premise in as good condition as it by law or rental agreement should have been at the commencement of tenant occupation.
iv. Maintain all electrical, plumbing, heating, and other facilities in good working order.
v. Maintain all dwelling units in reasonably weather tight condition and good exterior appearance.
vi. Remove graffiti within 24 hours of it having been observed. vii. Recreation facilities shall be for tenant use only. viii. Provide 24 hour access for Visalia Police Department to Maintenance and/or Management Staff. Maintenance and/or Management Staff shall be available by telephone or pager at all times, with phone numbers to be provided to the Police Department dispatch center and kept current at all times. ix. Establish and conduct a regular program of routine maintenance for the apartment/residential complex. Such a program shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: regular inspections of common areas and scheduled re-paintings, re-plantings, and other similar activities that typically require attention at periodic intervals but not necessarily continuously. x. The name and phone number of the management company shall be posted in a prominent location at the front of the property.

B. Landscape Care and Maintenance
i. Automatic irrigation systems shall be maintained.
ii. All plant materials (trees, shrubs, and groundcover) shall be maintained so that harm from physical damage or injury arising from vehicle damage, lack of water, chemical damage, insects, and other pests is minimized. iii. It is the responsibility of the property owners to seek professional advice and spray and treat trees, shrubs, and groundcover for diseases which can be successfully controlled if such untreated diseases are capable of destroying an infected tree or other trees within a project.
iv. Maintain decorative planting so as not to obstruct or diminish lighting level throughout the apartment/residential complex. Landscaping shall not obscure common areas.
1794
C. Parking - The parking of inoperative vehicles on-site, and boats, trucks (one-ton capacity and over), trailers, and/or recreational vehicles in the apartment/residential complex is not allowed.

D. Tenant Agreement - The tenant agreement for the complex must contain the following:
i. Standards of aesthetics for renters in regard to the use and conditions of the areas of the units visible from the outside (patios, entryways). ii. Hours when noise is not acceptable, based upon Community Noise Standards, additional standards may be applied within the apartment/residential complex. iii. Rules for use of open areas/recreational areas of the site in regard to drinking, congregating, or public nuisance activities.
iv. Prohibition on inoperable vehicles on-site, and boats, trucks (one-ton capacity and over), trailers and/or recreational vehicles.
v. Standards of behavior for tenants that could lead to eviction. vi. All tenants shall read and receive a copy of the Tenant Agreement.

10.That the northernmost drive approach along the western boundary of the proposed multi-family development be located a minimum 200 feet from the Linwood Street/Coburn Avenue intersection.

11.That all applicable federal, state, regional, and city policies and ordinances be met.

APPEAL INFORMATION
Annexation
For the Annexation, the Planning Commission’s recommendation is advisory only. The final decision will be by the Visalia City Council following a public hearing. Therefore, the Planning Commission’s recommendation in this matter is not appealable.

Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587, Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22
According to the City of Visalia Subdivision Ordinance Section 16.28.080, an appeal to the City Council may be submitted within ten days following the date of a decision by the Planning Commission. An appeal with applicable fees shall be in writing and shall be filed with the City Clerk at 220 North Santa Fe St., Visalia, CA. The appeal shall specify errors or abuses of discretion by the Planning Commission, or decisions not supported by the evidence in the record.

The appeal form can be found on the City’s website www.visalia.city or from the City Clerk. 1795
Attachments:
• Related Plans and Policies
• Resolution No. 2022-14 – Annexation No. 2022-02
- Attachment “A” – Annexation Area
- Attachment “B” – Annexation Agreement
• Resolution No. 2022-12 – Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 • Resolution No. 2022-13 – Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-05 • Resolution No. 2023-2 – Conditional Use Permit No. 2023-22 • Exhibit "A" – Belissa Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5587 • Exhibit “B” – Annexation Area
• Exhibit “C” – Multi-family Development Plan
• Exhibit “D” – Phasing Plan
• Exhibit “E” – Wall/Fencing Plan
• Exhibit “F” – Setbacks Exhibit
• Exhibit “G” – Street/Ditch Cross Sections, Modified Knuckle Exhibit • Exhibit “H” – Building Elevations (Ariette and Madison models, multi-family development) • Exhibit “I” – Floor Plans (Ariette and Madison models, multi-family development) • Exhibit “J” – Project Narrative
• Exhibit “K” – Landscape Plan (subdivision and multi-family development) • Exhibit “J” – General Plan Land Use Exhibit
• Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-39 • Site Plan Review Item No. 2021-116 (Subdivision)
• Site Plan Review Item No. 2021-141 (Multi-family Development) • General Plan Land Use Map
• Zoning Map
• Aerial Map
• Location Map
1796

RELATED PLANS AND POLICIES
General Plan and Zoning: The following General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies apply to the proposed project:

General Plan Land Use Policies:

LU-P-21:Allow annexation and development of residential, commercial, regional retail, and industrial land to occur within the Urban Development Boundary (Tier II) and the Urban Growth Boundary (Tier III) consistent with the City’s Land Use Diagram, according to the following phasing thresholds: • “Tier II”: Tier II supports a target buildout population of approximately 178,000. The expansion criteria for land in Tier II is that land would only become available for development when building permits have been issued in Tier I at the following levels, starting from April 1, 2010:

Residential: after permits for 5,850 housing units have been issued.

LU-P-55: Update the Zoning Ordinance to reflect the Low Density Residential designation on the Land Use Diagram for development at 2 to 10 dwelling units per gross acre, facilitating new planned neighborhoods and infill development in established areas. This designation is intended to provide for single-family detached housing with densities typical of single-family subdivisions.

Duplex units, townhouses, and small-lot detached housing may be incorporated as part of Low Density Residential developments. Development standards will ensure that a desirable singlefamily neighborhood character is maintained.

LU-P-56: Update the Zoning Ordinance to reflect the Medium Density Residential designation on the Land Use Diagram for development at 10 to 15 dwelling units per gross acre.

This designation can accommodate a mix of housing types including small-lot single-family, townhouses, two- and four-plexes, and garden apartments, on infill lots or new development areas within walking distance of neighborhood nodes and corridors. Medium Density Residential development may also be permitted on corner lots in single-family zones and in infill areas where it can be made to be consistent with adjacent properties through the conditional use process. Development standards will ensure that new development contributes positively to the larger community environment. Projects on sites larger than five acres or involving more than 60 units will require discretionary review.

LU-P-57: Update the Zoning Ordinance to reflect the High Density Residential designation on the Land Use Diagram for development at 15 to 35 dwelling units per gross acre, accommodating townhouses, twoand four-plexes, and multistory condominium and apartment buildings. The designation is appropriate for some infill sites and new areas in close proximity to neighborhood centers and major transportation routes.

High Density Residential development may also be permitted in infill areas where it can be made to be consistent with adjacent properties through the conditional use permit process. Development standards will ensure that new development contributes positively to the creation of neighborhood nodes or districts.

Projects on sites larger than five acres or involving more than 60 units will require discretionary review LU-P-67: Update the Zoning Ordinance to reflect the Neighborhood Commercial designation on the Land Use Diagram, intended for small-scale commercial development that primarily serves surrounding residential areas, wherein small office uses as well as horizontal or vertical residential mixed use are also supported. Provide standards to ensure that neighborhood commercial uses are economically-viable and also integrated into neighborhoods, with multimodal access and context-sensitive design.

Neighborhood Commercial development shall be subject to design review and public input. If residential uses are included, density should be 10 to 15 dwelling units per gross acre. Shopping centers in Neighborhood Commercial areas shall have the following characteristics:
• Anchored by a grocery store or similar business offering fresh produce, poultry, fish and meat; • Include smaller in-line stores of less than 10,000 square feet; 1797
• Total size of 5 to 12 acres or as shown on the Land Use Diagram; and • Integrated with surrounding neighborhood uses in terms of design, with negative impacts minimized.
• Located no closer than one mile from other General Plan-designated Neighborhood Commercial or Community Commercial locations, or from existing grocery stores. • No individual tenant shall be larger than 40,000 square feet in size.

Standards for Neighborhood Commercial development also shall require design measures that create a walkable environment and require local street and pedestrian connections. Alterations and additions in existing nonconforming centers may be permitted, subject to design review and conditions of approval to minimize neighborhood impacts.

Zoning Ordinance Chapter for R-1 Zone
Chapter 17.12
R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE

17.12.010 Purpose and intent.

In the R-1 single-family residential zones (R-1-5, R-1-12.5, and R-1-20), the purpose and intent is to provide living area within the city where development is limited to low density concentrations of one-family dwellings where regulations are designed to accomplish the following: to promote and encourage a suitable environment for family life; to provide space for community facilities needed to compliment urban residential areas and for institutions that require a residential environment; to minimize traffic congestion and to avoid an overload of utilities designed to service only low density residential use.

17.12.015 Applicability.

The requirements in this chapter shall apply to all property within R-1 zone districts.

17.12.020 Permitted uses.

In the R-1 single-family residential zones, the following uses shall be permitted by right:

A. One-family dwellings;
B. Raising of fruit and nut trees, vegetables and horticultural specialties; C. Accessory structures located on the same site with a permitted use including private garages and carports, one guest house, storehouses, garden structures, green houses, recreation room and hobby shops;
D. Swimming pools used solely by persons resident on the site and their guests; provided, that no swimming pool or accessory mechanical equipment shall be located in a required front yard or in a required side yard;
E. Temporary subdivision sales offices;
F. Licensed day care for a maximum of fourteen (14) children in addition to the residing family; G. Twenty-four (24) hour residential care facilities or foster homes, for a maximum of six individuals in addition to the residing family;
H. Signs subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.48;
I. The keeping of household pets, subject to the definition of household pets set forth in Section

17.04.030;
J. Accessory dwelling units as specified in Sections 17.12.140 through 17.12.200; K. Adult day care up to twelve (12) persons in addition to the residing family; 1798
L. Other uses similar in nature and intensity as determined by the city planner; M. Legally existing multiple family units, and expansion or reconstruction as provided in Section

17.12.070.

N. Transitional or supportive housing for six (6) or fewer resident/clients.

O. In the R-1-20 zone only, the breeding, hatching, raising and fattening of birds, rabbits, chinchillas, hamsters, other small animals and fowl, on a domestic noncommercial scale, provided that there shall not be less than one thousand (1,000) square feet of site area for each fowl or animal and provided that no structure housing poultry or small animals shall be closer than fifty (50) feet to any property line, closer than twenty-five (25) feet to any dwelling on the site, or closer than fifty (50) feet to any other dwelling; P. In the R-1-20 zone only, the raising of livestock, except pigs of any kind, subject to the exception of not more than two cows, two horses, four sheep or four goats for each site, shall be permitted; provided, that there be no limitation on the number of livestock permitted on a site with an area of ten acres or more and provided that no stable be located closer than fifty (50) feet to any dwelling on the site or closer than one hundred (100) feet to any other dwelling;

17.12.030 Accessory uses.

In the R-1 single-family residential zone, the following accessory uses shall be permitted, subject to specified provisions:

A. Home occupations subject to the provisions of Section 17.32.030; B. Accessory buildings subject to the provisions of Section 17.12.100(B).

C. Cottage Food Operations subject to the provisions of Health and Safety Code 113758 and Section

17.32.035.

17.12.040 Conditional uses.

In the R-1 single-family residential zone, the following conditional uses may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17.38:

A. Planned development subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.26; B. Public and quasi-public uses of an educational or religious type including public and parochial elementary schools, junior high schools, high schools and colleges; nursery schools, licensed day care facilities for more than fourteen (14) children; churches, parsonages and other religious institutions; C. Public and private charitable institutions, general hospitals, sanitariums, nursing and convalescent homes; not including specialized hospitals, sanitariums, or nursing, rest and convalescent homes including care for acute psychiatric, drug addiction or alcoholism cases; D. Public uses of an administrative, recreational, public service or cultural type including city, county, state or federal administrative centers and courts, libraries, museums, art galleries, police and fire stations, ambulance service and other public building, structures and facilities; public playgrounds, parks and community centers;
E. Electric distribution substations;
F. Gas regulator stations;
G. Public service pumping stations, i.e., community water service wells; H. Communications equipment buildings;
I. Planned neighborhood commercial center subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.26; J. Residential development specifically designed for senior housing; K. Mobile home parks in conformance with Section 17.32.040; 1799
L. [Reserved.] M. Residential developments utilizing private streets in which the net lot area (lot area not including street area) meets or exceeds the site area prescribed by this article and in which the private streets are designed and constructed to meet or exceed public street standards; N. Adult day care in excess of twelve (12) persons;
O. Duplexes on corner lots;
P. Twenty-four (24) hour residential care facilities or foster homes for more than six individuals in addition to the residing family;
Q. Residential structures and accessory buildings totaling more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet; R. Other uses similar in nature and intensity as determined by the city planner.

S. Transitional or supportive housing for seven (7) or more resident/clients.

17.12.050 Site area.

The minimum site area shall be as follows:

Zone Minimum Site Area
R-1-5 5,000 square feet
R-1-12.5 12,500 square feet
R-1-20 20,000 square feet
A. Each site shall have not less than forty (40) feet of frontage on the public street. The minimum width shall be as follows:

Zone Interior Lot Corner Lot
R-1-5 50 feet 60 feet
R-1-12.5 90 feet 100 feet
R-1-20 100 feet 110 feet
B. Minimum width for corner lot on a side on cul-de-sac shall be eighty (80) feet, when there is no landscape lot between the corner lot and the right of way.

17.12.060 One dwelling unit per site.

In the R-1 single-family residential zone, not more than one dwelling unit shall be located on each site, with the exception to Section 17.12.020(J).

17.12.070 Replacement and expansion of legally existing multiple family units.

In accordance with Sections 17.12.020 legally existing multiple family units may be expanded or replaced if destroyed by fire or other disaster subject to the following criteria:

A. A site plan review permit as provided in Chapter 17.28 is required for all expansions or replacements.

B. Replacement/expansion of unit(s) shall be designed and constructed in an architectural style compatible with the existing single-family units in the neighborhood. Review of elevations for replacement/expansion shall occur through the site plan review process. Appeals to architectural requirements of the site plan review committee shall be subject to the appeals process set forth in Chapter

17.28.050.

C. Setbacks and related development standards shall be consistent with existing single-family units in the neighborhood.

D. Parking requirements set forth in Section 17.34.020 and landscaping requirements shall meet current city standards and shall apply to the entire site(s), not just the replacement unit(s) or expanded area, which may result in the reduction of the number of units on the site. 1800
E. The number of multiple family units on the site shall not be increased.

F. All rights established under Sections 17.12.020and 17.12.070 shall be null and void one hundred eighty (180) days after the date that the unit(s) are destroyed (or rendered uninhabitable), unless a building permit has been obtained and diligent pursuit of construction has commenced. The approval of a site plan review permit does not constitute compliance with this requirement.

17.12.080 Front yard.

A. The minimum front yard shall be as follows:

Zone Minimum Front Yard
R-1-5 Fifteen (15) feet for living space and side-loading garages and twenty-two (22) feet for frontloading garages or other parking facilities, such as, but not limited to, carports, shade canopies, or porte cochere. A Porte Cochere with less than twenty-two (22) feet of setback from property line shall not be counted as covered parking, and garages on such sites shall not be the subject of a garage conversion.

R-1-12.5 Thirty (30) feet
R-1-20 Thirty-five (35) feet
B. On a site situated between sites improved with buildings, the minimum front yard may be the average depth of the front yards on the improved site adjoining the side lines of the site but need not exceed the minimum front yard specified above.

C. On cul-de-sac and knuckle lots with a front lot line of which all or a portion is curvilinear, the front yard setback shall be no less than fifteen (15) feet for living space and side-loading garages and twenty (20) feet for front-loading garages.

17.12.090 Side yards.

A. The minimum side yard shall be five feet in the R-1-5 and R-1-12.5 zone subject to the exception that on the street side of a corner lot the side yard shall be not less than ten feet and twenty-two (22) feet for front loading garages or other parking facilities, such as, but not limited to, carports, shade canopies, or porte cocheres.

B. The minimum side yard shall be ten feet in the R-1-20 zone subject to the exception that on the street side of a corner lot the side yard shall be not less than twenty (20) feet.

C. On a reversed corner lot the side yard adjoining the street shall be not less than ten feet.

D. On corner lots, all front-loading garage doors shall be a minimum of twenty-two (22) feet from the nearest public improvement or sidewalk.

E. Side yard requirements may be zero feet on one side of a lot if two or more consecutive lots are approved for a zero lot line development by the site plan review committee.

F. The placement of any mechanical equipment, including but not limited to, pool/spa equipment and evaporative coolers shall not be permitted in the five-foot side yard within the buildable area of the lot, or within five feet of rear/side property lines that are adjacent to the required side yard on adjoining lots. This provision shall not apply to street side yards on corner lots, nor shall it prohibit the surface mounting of utility meters and/or the placement of fixtures and utility lines as approved by the building and planning divisions.

17.12.100 Rear yard.

In the R-1 single-family residential zones, the minimum yard shall be twenty-five (25) feet, subject to the following exceptions:

A. On a corner or reverse corner lot the rear yard shall be twenty-five (25) feet on the narrow side or twenty (20) feet on the long side of the lot. The decision as to whether the short side or long side is used as the rear yard area shall be left to the applicant's discretion as long as a minimum area of one thousand 1801
five hundred (1,500) square feet of usable rear yard area is maintained. The remaining side yard to be a minimum of five feet.

B. Accessory structures not exceeding twelve (12) feet may be located in the required rear yard but not closer than three feet to any lot line provided that not more than twenty (20) percent of the area of the required rear yard shall be covered by structures enclosed on more than one side and not more than forty (40) percent may be covered by structures enclosed on only one side. On a reverse corner lot an accessory structure shall not be located closer to the rear property line than the required side yard on the adjoining key lot. An accessory structure shall not be closer to a side property line adjoining key lot and not closer to a side property line adjoining the street than the required front yard on the adjoining key lot.

C. Main structures may encroach up to five feet into a required rear yard area provided that such encroachment does not exceed one story and that a usable, open, rear yard area of at least one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet shall be maintained. Such encroachment and rear yard area shall be approved by the city planner prior to issuing building permits.

17.12.110 Height of structures.

In the R-1 single-family residential zone, the maximum height of a permitted use shall be thirty-five (35) feet, with the exception of structures specified in Section 17.12.100(B).

17.12.120 Off-street parking.

In the R-1 single-family residential zone, subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.34.

17.12.130 Fences, walls and hedges.

In the R-1 single-family residential zone, fences, walls and hedges are subject to the provisions of Section

17.36.030.

17.12.135 Lot area less than 5,000 square feet.

A. Notwithstanding Section 17.12.050, lots in the R-1-5 zone may have a lot area of between 3,600 and 4,999 square feet if all of the following standards are met:

1. The Planning Commission finds that the development's overall density is consistent with the General Plan.

2. The maximum number of lots less than 5,000 square feet that may be approved by a tentative subdivision map shall be fifty (50) percent or less of the total lots.

3. Streets shall be constructed to public street standards.

4. Each subdivision with at least 15 lots that are less than 5,000 square feet in size shall make available to buyers at least three (3) different small lot floor plans with at least four (4) available elevation designs for each floor plan to construct on those lots.

5. The primary frontage of the dwelling unit shall face a public street, primary entryway, circulation walkway, or open space with sidewalks that provide delineated paths of travel.

6. The primary frontage of the dwelling unit shall include the primary entrance and at least one window.

7. Required covered parking spaces shall be in garages. Carports are prohibited.

8. The width of the garage shall not be greater than fifty (50) percent of the width of the dwelling unit.

9. The garage shall not extend beyond the front building facade (living area.)

10. All dwelling units shall include a covered front porch at least four (4) feet deep and six (6) feet wide or an uncovered front courtyard at least five (5) feet wide and five (5) feet deep that is surrounded on four sides by the dwelling unit or a wall or fence between three (3) and four (4) feet high with a pedestrian gate or entryway.
1802

11. The building official shall not approve a building permit for a new dwelling unit on a lot with a lot area less than 5,000 square feet until the city planner, or designee, has determined that the standards identified in this section are met.

12. The subdivision shall provide a common, usable open space area of a minimum 3,000 square feet or two hundred fifty (250) square feet per lot under 5,000 square feet, whichever is greater. The area shall be landscaped and maintained with funding from either a homeowner's association or a landscape and lighting act district.

B. Notwithstanding this Chapter, lots with less than five thousand (5,000) square feet shall have the following minimum dimensions and building setback areas, unless they were approved with a planned development permit:

1. The minimum lot depth shall be seventy (70) feet.

2. The minimum lot width shall be forty-six (46) feet for interior lots and fifty-one (51) feet for corner lots.

3. The minimum front building setback area shall be twelve (12) feet for livable space and twenty (20) feet for garages.

4. The minimum rear yard building setback area shall be fifteen (15) feet.

5. The minimum interior side yard building setback area shall be five (5) feet.

6. The minimum corner side yard building setback area shall be ten (10) feet.

7. The maximum building height shall be thirty-five (35) feet.

8. Lots shall provide for a usable open space area of a minimum three hundred (300) square feet. The open space shall be a minimum fifteen (15) feet wide.

C. Lots less having a lot area of 3,600 square feet, or lots that do not meet the standards in this section may be approved through the planned development permit process per Chapter 17.26. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017)
Chapter 17.16
R-M Multi-Family Residential Zone

17.16.010 Purpose and intent.

In the R-M multi-family residential zones, the purpose and intent is to provide living areas within the two multi-family residential zones (one medium density and one high density) with housing facilities where development is permitted with a relatively high concentration of dwelling units, and still preserve the desirable characteristics and amenities of a low density atmosphere.

17.16.015 Applicability.

The requirements in this chapter shall apply to all property within R-M zone districts.

17.16.020 Permitted uses.

In the R-M multi-family residential zones, the following uses are permitted by right:

A. Existing one-family dwellings;
B. Multi-family dwellings up to sixty (60) dwelling units per site in the R-M-2 zone and the R-M-3 zone;
C. Fruit, vegetable and horticultural husbandry;
D. Swimming pools used only by residents on the site and their guests, provided that no swimming pool or accessory mechanical equipment shall be located in a required front yard or in a required side yard;
E. Temporary subdivision sales offices;
F. Licensed day care for a maximum of fourteen (14) children in addition to the residing family, situated within an existing single-family dwelling;
G. Twenty-four (24) hour care facilities or foster homes for a maximum of six individuals in addition to the residing family;
1803
H. Signs subject to the provision of Chapter 17.48;
I. The keeping of household pets, subject to the definition of household pets set forth in Section

17.04.030;
J. Adult day care for a maximum of twelve (12) individuals in addition to the residing family, situated within an existing single-family dwelling;
K. Other uses similar in nature and intensity as determined by the city planner.

L. Transitional or supportive housing for six (6) or fewer resident/clients.

M. Single-room occupancy (SRO), as follows:

1. Up to fifteen (15) units per gross acre in the R-M-2 zone district;

2. Up to twenty-nine (29) units per gross acre in the R-M-3 zone district.

17.16.030 Accessory uses.

In the R-M multi-family residential zone, accessory uses include:

A. Home occupations subject to the provisions of Section 17.32.030; B. Accessory buildings subject to the provisions of Section 17.16.090B.

17.16.040 Conditional uses.

In the R-M multi-family residential zone, the following conditional uses may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17.38:

A. Public and quasi-public uses of an educational or religious type including public and parochial elementary schools, junior high schools, high schools and colleges; nursery schools, licensed day care facilities for more than fourteen (14) children; churches, parsonages and other religious institutions; B. Public and private charitable institutions; general hospitals, sanitariums, nursing and convalescent homes; including specialized hospitals, sanitariums, or nursing, rest and convalescent homes including care for acute psychiatric, drug addiction or alcoholism cases; C. Public uses of an administrative, recreational, public service or cultural type including city, county, state or federal administrative centers and courts, libraries, museums, art galleries, police and fire stations and other public buildings, structures and facilities; public playgrounds, parks and community centers;
D. In the R-M-3 zone only, an open air public or private parking lot, subject to all provisions of Section 17.34.030, excluding trucks over 3/4 ton;
E. Electric distribution substations;
F. Gas regulator stations;
G. Public service pumping stations and/or elevated or underground tanks; H. Communication equipment buildings;
I. In R-M-2 zone only, mobile home parks;
J. More than sixty (60) units per site in the R-M-2 zone, and within the R-M-3 zone; K. Boarding houses and residential motels;
L. [Reserved]
M. Senior citizen residential developments;
N. Adult day care in excess of twelve (12) individuals; O. Planned developments may utilize the provisions of Chapter 17.26; P. New one-family dwelling, meeting density identified in the general plan land use element designations;
Q. Other uses similar in nature and intensity as determined by the city planner; R. Residential developments utilizing private streets in which the net lot area (lot area not including street area) meets or exceeds the site area prescribed by this chapter and in which the private streets are designed and constructed to meet or exceed public street standards.

S. Transitional or supportive housing for seven (7) or more resident/clients.

17.16.050 Site area and configuration.

A. The division of (R-M) multi-family residential property less than two (2) acres shall be approved as part of a conditional use permit.
1804

17.16.060 Site area per dwelling unit and per structure.

The minimum site area per dwelling unit shall be three thousand (3,000) square feet in the R-M-2 zone and one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet in the R-M-3 zone.

17.16.070 Front yard.

A. The minimum front yard shall be as follows:

Zone Minimum Front Yard
R-M-2 15 feet
R-M-3 15 feet
B. On a site situated between sites improved with buildings, the minimum front yard may be the average depth of the front yards on the improved site adjoining the side lines of the site but need not exceed the minimum front yard specified above.

C. All garage doors facing the front property line shall be a minimum of twenty-two (22) feet from the nearest public improvement or sidewalk.

17.16.080 Side yards.

A. The minimum side yard for a permitted or conditional use shall be five feet per story subject to the exception that on the street side of a corner lot the side yard shall be not less than ten feet.

B. Side yard providing access to more than one dwelling unit shall be not less than ten feet.

C. On corner lots, all garage doors shall be a minimum of twenty-two (22) feet from the nearest public improvement or sidewalk.

17.16.090 Rear yard.

The minimum rear yard for a permitted use shall be fifteen (15) feet in the R-M-3 zone and twenty-five (25) feet in the R-M-2 zone, subject to the following exceptions:

A. On a corner or reverse corner lot in R-M-2 zone the rear yard shall be twenty-five (25) feet on the narrow side or twenty (20) feet on the long side of the lot. The decision as to whether the short side or long side is used as the rear yard area shall be left to the applicant's discretion, as long as a minimum area of one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet of usable rear yard area is maintained.

B. Accessory structures not exceeding twelve (12) feet in height may be located in the required rear yard, but not closer than three feet to any lot line; provided, that on a reversed corner lot an accessory structure shall be located not closer to the rear property line than the required side yard on the adjoining key lot and not closer to the side property line adjoining the street than the required front yard on the adjoining key lot. In placing accessory structures in a required rear yard a usable, open, rear yard area of at least one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet shall be maintained.

C. Exceptions to the rear yard setback can be granted for multiple family units that have their rear yard abutting an alley. The exception may be granted if the rear yard area is to be used for parking.

17.16.100 Height of structures.

The maximum height of structures shall be thirty-five (35) feet or three (3) stories whichever is taller in the R-M-2 zone. The maximum height shall be thirty-five (35) feet or three (3) stories whichever is taller in the R-M-3 zone. Where an R-M-2 or R-M-3 site adjoins an R-1 site, the second and third story shall be designed to limit visibility from the second and third story to the R-1 site. Structures specified under Section 17.16.090(B) shall be exempt.

17.16.110 Off-street parking.

Off-street parking shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.34.

17.16.120 Fences, walls and hedges.

Fences, walls and hedges shall be subject to the provisions of Section 17.36.040.

17.16.130 Trash enclosures.

Enclosures for trash receptacles are permitted that comply with the specifications and requirements of Section 17.32.010 and that are approved by the site plan review committee. Enclosures within the front yard setback are permitted for multiple family dwelling units when deemed necessary by city staff because no other appropriate location for an enclosure exists on the property. 1805

17.16.140 Site plan review.

A site plan review permit must be obtained for all developments other than a single-family residence in R-M zones, subject to the requirements and procedures of Chapter 17.28.

17.16.150 Open space and recreational areas.

Any multiple family project approved under a conditional use permit or site plan review permit shall dedicate at least five (5) percent of the site to open, common, usable space and/or recreational facilities for use by tenants as a part of that plan. The calculated space shall not include setback areas adjacent to a street. Shared open space could include parks, playgrounds, sports courts, swimming pools, gardens, and covered patios or gazebos open on at least three (3) sides. Further, the calculated space shall not include enclosed meeting or community rooms. The specific size, location and use shall be approved as a part of the conditional use permit.

17.16.160 Screening.

All parking areas adjacent to public streets and R-1 sites shall be screened from view subject to the requirements and procedures of Chapter 17.28.

17.16.170 Screening fence.

Where a multiple family site adjoins an R-1 site, a screening block wall or wood fence not less than six feet in height shall be located along the property line; except in a required front yard, or the street side of a corner lot and suitably maintained.

17.16.180 Landscaping.

All multiple family developments shall have landscaping including plants, and ground cover to be consistent with surrounding landscaping in the vicinity. Landscape plans to be approved by city staff prior to installation and occupancy of use and such landscaping to be permanently maintained.

17.16.190 Model Good Neighbor Policies.

Before issuance of building permits, project proponents of multi-family residential developments in the RM zones that are subject to approval by the Site Plan Review Committee or the Planning Commission, shall enter into an operational management plan (Plan), in a form approved by the City for the long term maintenance and management of the development. The Plan shall include but not be limited to: The maintenance of landscaping for the associated properties; the maintenance of private drives and open space parking; the maintenance of the fences, on-site lighting and other improvements that are not along the public street frontages; enforcing all provisions covered by covenants, conditions and restrictions that are placed on the property; and, enforcing all provisions of the model Good Neighbor Policies as specified by Resolution of the Planning Commission, and as may be amended by resolution.

17.16.200 Signs.

Signs shall be placed in conformance with Chapter 17.48.

Chapter 17.18

COMMERCIAL ZONES

17.18.010 Purpose and intent.

A. The several types of commercial zones included in this chapter are designed to achieve the following:

1. Provide appropriate areas for various types of retail stores, offices, service establishments and wholesale businesses to be concentrated for the convenience of the public; and to be located and grouped on sites that are in logical proximity to the respective geographical areas and respective categories of patrons that they serve in a manner consistent with the general plan;

2. Maintain and improve Visalia's retail base to serve the needs of local residents and encourage shoppers from outside the community;

3. Accommodate a variety of commercial activities to encourage new and existing business that will employ residents of the city and those of adjacent communities;

4. Maintain Visalia's role as the regional retailing center for Tulare and Kings Counties and ensure the continued viability of the existing commercial areas;
1806

5. Maintain commercial land uses that are responsive to the needs of shoppers, maximizing accessibility and minimizing trip length;

6. Ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses.

B. The purposes of the individual commercial zones are as follows:

1. Neighborhood Commercial Zone (C-N). The purpose and intent of the neighborhood commercial zone district is to provide for small-scale commercial development that primarily serves surrounding residential areas, wherein small office uses as well as horizontal or vertical residential mixed use are also supported, and provide standards to ensure that neighborhood commercial uses are economically viable and also integrated into neighborhoods in terms of design, with negative impacts minimized, with multimodal access, and context-sensitive design. Neighborhood Commercial development shall be subject to design review and public input. There should be 10 to 15 dwelling units per gross acre where residential uses are included. Shopping centers shall be of a total size of 5 to 12 acres and located no closer than one mile from other General Plan designated Neighborhood Commercial locations, or from existing grocery stores, anchored by a grocery store or similar business no larger than 40,000 square feet in size, and include smaller in-line stores of less than 10,000 square feet. Alterations and additions in existing nonconforming centers may be permitted, subject to design review and conditions of approval to minimize neighborhood impacts.

2. Regional Commercial Zone (C-R). The purpose and intent of the regional commercial zone district is to provide areas for retail establishments that are designed to serve a regional service trade area. The uses permitted in this district are to be of a large-scale regional retail nature with supporting goods and services. Uses that are designed to provide service to residential areas and convenience, neighborhood and community level retail are not permitted, while office uses are to be limited.

3. Service Commercial Zone (C-S). The purpose and intent of the planned service commercial zone district is to provide areas that accommodate wholesale, heavy commercial uses, such as lumberyards and construction material retail uses, etc., and services such as automotive, plumbing, and sheet metal fabrication. It is intended that uses in this district be those that can be compatible with heavy truck traffic and noise. Uses that would restrict the operation of generally permitted heavy commercial businesses are not provided in this district. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7310)

17.18.015 Applicability.

The requirements in this chapter shall apply to all property within the C-N, C-R, and C-S zone districts. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017)

17.18.020 Permitted uses.

Permitted uses in the C-N, C-R, and C-S zones shall be determined by Table 17.25.030 in Section 17.25.030. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017; Ord. 2016-06, 2016; Ord. 2015-04 § 2, 2015; Ord. 2015- 01 § 2, 2015; Ord. 2014-07 § 3 (part), 2014; Ord. 2012-10, 2012; Ord. 2012-08, 2012; Ord. 2012-02, 2012; Ord. 2011-07 § 2, 2011; Ord. 2010-16, 2010; Ord. 2009-02, 2009; Ord. 2006-17, 2006; Res. 2004- 75 (part), 2004; Ord. 2004-08 § 3, 2004; Res. 2004-14 (part), 2004; Res. 2003-95 (part), 2003; Res. 2002-83, 2002; Res. 2002-26, 2002; Res. 2001-40, 2001; Res. 2001-29, 2001; Ord. 2000-01 § 6, 2000; Ord. 9903 § 3, 1999; Ord. 9717 § 2 (part), 1997; amended by council August 13, 1997; amended by council June 3, 1996 and May 20, 1996: prior code § 7328)

17.18.030 Conditional and temporary uses.

Conditional and temporary uses in the C-N, C-R, and C-S zones shall be determined by Table

17.25.030 in Section 17.25.030. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: Ord. 2016-06, 2016; Ord. 2015-04 § 2, 2015; Ord. 2015-01 § 2, 2015; Ord. 2014-07 § 3 (part), 2014; Ord. 2012-10, 2012; Ord. 2012-08, 2012; Ord. 2012-02, 2012; Ord. 2011-07 § 2, 2011; Ord. 2010-16, 2010; Ord. 2009-02, 2009; Ord. 2006-17, 2006; Res. 2004-75 (part), 2004; Ord. 2004-08 § 3, 2004; Res. 2004-14 (part), 2004; Res. 2003-95 (part), 2003; Res. 2002-83, 2002; Res. 2002-26, 2002; Res. 2001-40, 2001; Res. 2001-29, 2001; Ord. 2000-01 § 6, 2000; Ord. 9903 § 3, 1999; Ord. 9717 § 2 (part), 1997; amended by council August 13, 1997; amended by council June 3, 1996 and May 20, 1996: prior code § 7328)

17.18.040 Required conditions.

A. A site plan review permit must be obtained for all development in all C-N, C-S, and C-R zones, subject to the requirements and procedures in Chapter 17.28.

B. All businesses, services and processes shall be conducted entirely within a completely enclosed structure, except for off-street parking and loading areas, gasoline service stations, outdoor dining areas, 1807
nurseries, garden shops, Christmas tree sales lots, bus depots and transit stations, electric distribution substation, and recycling facilities;
C. All products produced on the site of any of the permitted uses shall be sold primarily at retail on the site where produced;
D. All new construction in existing C-N zones not a part of a previously approved planned development shall conform with development standards determined by the site plan review committee. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7319)

17.18.050 Off-street parking and loading facilities.

Off-street parking and off-street loading facilities shall be provided as prescribed in Chapter 17.34. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7325)

17.18.060 Development standards in the C-N zone.

The following development standards shall apply to property located in the C-N zone:

A. Minimum site area: five (5) acres.

B. Maximum building height: fifty (50) feet.

C. Minimum required yards (building setbacks):

1. Front: fifteen (15) feet;

2. Rear: zero (0) feet;

3. Rear yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: fifteen (15) feet;

4. Side: zero (0) feet;

5. Side yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: fifteen (15) feet;

6. Street side yard on corner lot: ten (10) feet.

D. Minimum required landscaped yard (setback) areas:

1. Front: fifteen (15) feet;

2. Rear: five (5) feet (except where a building is located on side property line);

3. Rear yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: five (5) feet;

4. Side: five (5) feet (except where a building is located on side property line);

5. Side yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: five (5) feet;

6. Street side on corner lot: ten (10) feet. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017)

17.18.070 Development standards in the C-R zone.

The following development standards shall apply to property located in the C-R zone:

A. Minimum site area: five (5) acres.

B. Maximum building height: fifty (50) feet.

C. Minimum required yards (building setbacks):

1. Front: twenty (20) feet;

2. Rear: zero (0) feet;

3. Rear yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: fifteen (15) feet;

4. Side: zero (0) feet;

5. Side yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: fifteen (15) feet;

6. Street side yard on corner lot: ten (10) feet.

D. Minimum required landscaped yard (setback) areas:

1. Front: twenty (20) feet;

2. Rear: five (5) feet;

3. Rear yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: five (5) feet;

4. Side: five (5) feet (except where a building is located on side property line);

5. Side yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: five (5) feet;

6. Street side on corner lot: ten (10) feet. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017)

17.18.080 Development standards in the C-S zone.

The following development standards shall apply to property located in the C-S zone:

A. Minimum site area: five thousand (5,000) square feet.

B. Maximum building height: sixty (60) feet.

C. Minimum required yards (building setbacks):

1. Front: ten (10) feet;

2. Rear: zero (0) feet;

3. Rear yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: fifteen (15) feet; 1808

4. Side: zero (0) feet;

5. Side yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: fifteen (15) feet;

6. Street side yard on corner lot: ten (10) feet.

D. Minimum required landscaped yard (setback) areas:

1. Front: ten (10) feet;

2. Rear: five (5) feet (except where a building is located on side property line);

3. Rear yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: five (5) feet;

4. Side: five (5) feet (except where a building is located on side property line);

5. Side yards abutting an R-1 or R-M zone district: five (5) feet;

6. Street side on corner lot: ten (10) feet. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017) Chapter 17.38
Conditional Use Permits

17.38.010 Purposes and powers.

In certain zones conditional uses are permitted subject to the granting of a conditional use permit.

Because of their unusual characteristics, conditional uses require special consideration so that they may be located properly with respect to the objectives of the zoning ordinance and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. In order to achieve these purposes and thus give the zone use regulations the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, the planning commission is empowered to grant or deny applications for conditional use permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of such permits.

17.38.020 Application procedures.

A. Application for a conditional use permit shall be made to the planning commission on a form prescribed by the commission which shall include the following data:

1. Name and address of the applicant;

2. Statement that the applicant is the owner of the property or is the authorized agent of the owner;

3. Address and legal description of the property;

4. The application shall be accompanied by such sketches or drawings as may be necessary by the planning division to clearly show the applicant's proposal;

5. The purposes of the conditional use permit and the general description of the use proposed;

6. Additional information as required by the historic preservation advisory committee.

7. Additional technical studies or reports, as required by the Site Plan Review Committee.

8. A traffic study or analysis prepared by a certified traffic engineer, as required by the Site Plan Review Committee or Traffic Engineer, that identifies traffic service levels of surrounding arterials, collectors, access roads, and regionally significant roadways impacted by the project and any required improvements to be included as a condition or mitigation measure of the project in order to maintain the required services levels identified in the General Plan Circulation Element.

B. The application shall be accompanied by a fee set by resolution of the city council sufficient to cover the cost of handling the application.

17.38.030 Lapse of conditional use permit.

A conditional use permit shall lapse and shall become void twenty-four (24) months after the date on which it became effective, unless the conditions of the permit allowed a shorter or greater time limit, or unless prior to the expiration of twenty-four (24) months a building permit is issued by the city and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site that was the subject of the permit. A permit may be renewed for an additional period of one year; provided, that prior to the expiration of twenty-four (24) months from the date the permit originally became effective, an application for renewal is filed with the planning commission. The commission may grant or deny an application for renewal of a conditional use permit. In the case of a planned residential development, the recording of a final map and improvements thereto shall be deemed the same as a building permit in relation to this section.
1809

17.38.040 Revocation.

Upon violation of any applicable provision of this title, or, if granted subject to a condition or conditions, upon failure to comply with the condition or conditions, a conditional use permit shall be suspended automatically. The planning commission shall hold a public hearing within sixty (60) days, in accordance with the procedure prescribed in Section 17.38.080, and if not satisfied that the regulation, general provision or condition is being complied with, may revoke the permit or take such action as may be necessary to insure compliance with the regulation, general provision or condition. Appeals of the decision of the planning commission may be made to the city council as provided in Section 17.38.120.

17.38.050 New application.

Following the denial of a conditional use permit application or the revocation of a conditional use permit, no application for a conditional use permit for the same or substantially the same conditional use on the same or substantially the same site shall be filed within one year from the date of denial or revocation of the permit unless such denial was a denial without prejudice by the planning commission or city council.

17.38.060 Conditional use permit to run with the land.

A conditional use permit granted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure that was the subject of the permit application subject to the provisions of Section 17.38.065.

17.38.065 Abandonment of conditional use permit.

If the use for which a conditional use permit was approved is discontinued for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days, the use shall be considered abandoned and any future use of the site as a conditional use will require the approval of a new conditional use permit.

17.38.070 Temporary uses or structures.

A. Conditional use permits for temporary uses or structures may be processed as administrative matters by the city planner and/or planning division staff. However, the city planner may, at his/her discretion, refer such application to the planning commission for consideration.

B. The city planner and/or planning division staff is authorized to review applications and to issue such temporary permits, subject to the following conditions:

1. Conditional use permits granted pursuant to this section shall be for a fixed period not to exceed thirty (30) days for each temporary use not occupying a structure, including promotional enterprises, or six months for all other uses or structures.

2. Ingress and egress shall be limited to that designated by the planning division. Appropriate directional signing, barricades, fences or landscaping shall be provided where required. A security officer may be required for promotional events.

3. Off-street parking facilities shall be provided on the site of each temporary use as prescribed in Section 17.34.020.

4. Upon termination of the temporary permit, or abandonment of the site, the applicant shall remove all materials and equipment and restore the premises to their original condition.

5. Opening and closing times for promotional enterprises shall coincide with the hours of operation of the sponsoring commercial establishment. Reasonable time limits for other uses may be set by the city planner and planning division staff.

6. Applicants for a temporary conditional use permit shall have all applicable licenses and permits prior to issuance of a conditional use permit.

7. Signing for temporary uses shall be subject to the approval of the city planner.

8. Notwithstanding underlying zoning, temporary conditional use permits may be granted for fruit and vegetable stands on properties primarily within undeveloped agricultural areas. In reviewing applications for such stands, issues of traffic safety and land use compatibility shall be evaluated and mitigation measures and conditions may be imposed to ensure that the stands are built and are operated consistent with appropriate construction standards, vehicular access and off-street parking. All fruits and vegetables sold at such stands shall be grown by the owner/operator or purchased by said party directly from a grower/farmer.

9. Fruit/Vegetable stands shall be subject to site plan review. 1810
C. The City Planner shall deny a temporary use permit if findings cannot be made, or conditions exist that would be injurious to existing site, improvements, land uses, surrounding development or would be detrimental to the surrounding area.

D. The applicant or any interested person may appeal a decision of temporary use permit to the planning commission, setting forth the reason for such appeal to the commission. Such appeal shall be filed with the city planner in writing with applicable fees, within ten (10) days after notification of such decision. The appeal shall be placed on the agenda of the commission's next regular meeting. If the appeal is filed within five (5) days of the next regular meeting of the commission, the appeal shall be placed on the agenda of the commission's second regular meeting following the filing of the appeal. The commission shall review the temporary use permit and shall uphold or revise the decision of the temporary use permit, based on the findings set forth in Section 17.38.110. The decision of the commission shall be final unless appealed to the council pursuant to Section 17.02.145.

E. A privately owned parcel may be granted up to six (6) temporary use permits per calendar year.

17.38.080 Public hearing--Notice.

A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on each application for a conditional use permit.

B. Notice of the public hearing shall be given not less than ten days nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of the hearing by mailing a notice of the time and place of the hearing to property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the boundaries of the area occupied or to be occupied by the use that is the subject of the hearing, and by publication in a newspaper of general circulation within the city.

17.38.090 Investigation and report.

The planning staff shall make an investigation of the application and shall prepare a report thereon that shall be submitted to the planning commission. The report can recommend modifications to the application as a condition of approval.

17.38.100 Public hearing--Procedure.

At the public hearing the planning commission shall review the application and the statement and drawing submitted therewith and shall receive pertinent evidence concerning the proposed use and the proposed conditions under which it would be operated or maintained, particularly with respect to the findings prescribed in Section 17.38.110. The planning commission may continue a public hearing from time to time as it deems necessary.

17.38.110 Action by planning commission.

A. The planning commission may grant an application for a conditional use permit as requested or in modified form, if, on the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the commission makes the following findings:

1. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located;

2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

B. A conditional use permit may be revocable, may be granted for a limited time period, or may be granted subject to such conditions as the commission may prescribe. The commission may grant conditional approval for a permit subject to the effective date of a change of zone or other ordinance amendment.

C. The commission may deny an application for a conditional use permit.

17.38.120 Appeal to city council.

The decision of the City planning commission on a conditional use permit shall be subject to the appeal provisions of section 17.02.145.
1811

17.38.130 Effective date of conditional use permit.

A conditional use permit shall become effective immediately when granted or affirmed by the council, or ten days following the granting of the conditional use permit by the planning commission if no appeal has been filed.
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
7223 S.F. LOT J 20.00' 10.00'
TELPED
R
FH
LTE
R
R
R
TELPED
TELPED
SPIGOT
TELPED
R
FH
LTE
R
R
R
TELPED
TELPED
SPIGOT
TELPED
R
FH
LTE
R
R
R
TELPED
TELPED

SPIGOT RIVERWAY DRIVE
DEMAREE STREET 60.00'
LINWOOD ST 60.00'

NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL TIER 1 TIER 2 42.00'

MODOC DITCH
MODOC DITCH 42.00' DEDICATION TO COV FOR ROW 60' NEWTON AVE AISYLN AVE NEWTON AVE.

EXISTING WILDHORSE
SUBDIVISION ARLET AVE GILDA AVE GILDA AVE. PRATT ST

GALLIARD ST

FONTANA ST ERWIN AVE COBURN AVE COBURN AVE

FULGHAM ST

DELMONT ST

HERMAN ST

DELMONT ST
EXISTING 15" SS EXISTING 10" SS COBURN AVE EXISTING VALLEY OAK TREE LOCATE WITHIN L&L LOT MODIFIED CITY STANDARD KNUCKLE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BACKYARD AND FRONT YARD SPACE FOR LOTS. 84.00' 52' MODIFIED CITY STANDARD KNUCKLE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BACKYARD AND FRONT YARD SPACE FOR LOTS. MODIFIED CITY STANDARD KNUCKLE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BACKYARD AND FRONT YARD SPACE FOR LOTS. 42' DEDICATION TO COV 84.00 WALKING PATH REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A 15' MAINT. ACCESS PROPOSED 15" SS CITY WORKING ON FUTURE INTERSECTION DESIGNS: TO BE WORKED OUT DURING CIVIL DRAWINGS. A ROUNDABOUT IS BEING EVALUATED 42.0' 42' DEDICATION ALONG COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE FOR ROW PURPOSES EXISTING LOWERY RANCH 84.00' TRANSITION FROM 84' ROW TO 60' ROW.

Remainder Parcel - Future development 64.00' 42.00' CULVERTS REQUIRED FOR LOCAL STREET CROSSINGS OVER EXISTING DITCH CHANNELS. TYP. SETBACK LINE TYP. SETBACK LINE TYP. SETBACK LINE TYP. SETBACK LINE TYP. SETBACK LINE DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK MODOC DITCH - OUTLOT TO BE CREATED DITCH CENTERLINE TOP OF BANK 4129 S.F. 1103932 S.F. 109 2934 S.F. 1083004 S.F. 1072934 S.F. 106 2934 S.F. 105 2934 S.F. 104 2934 S.F. 103 3043 S.F. 102 3450 S.F. 101 4008 S.F. 96 3893 S.F. 97 3900 S.F. 98 3900 S.F. 99 4158 S.F. 78 7372 S.F. 774404 S.F. 76 4274 S.F. 75 3813 S.F. 18 3975 S.F. 15 3900 S.F. 14 3900 S.F. 13 3900 S.F. 12 3900 S.F. 11 3900 S.F. 10 3900 S.F. 9 3900 S.F. 8 3900 S.F. 7 3900 S.F. 6 4050 S.F. 5 4223 S.F. LOT D 4825 S.F. 3 4825 S.F. 2 4417 S.F. 60 4108 S.F. 61 4108 S.F. 62 4345 S.F. 63 4108 S.F. 64 4108 S.F. 65 4108 S.F. 66 4108 S.F. 67 4108 S.F. 68 4108 S.F. 69 4108 S.F. 70 4108 S.F. 71 4108 S.F. 723900 S.F. 46 3900 S.F. 47 3900 S.F. 48 3900 S.F. 49 3900 S.F. 50 3900 S.F. 51 3900 S.F. 52 3900 S.F. 53 3900 S.F. 54 4125 S.F. 55 3906 S.F. 56 4508 S.F. 57 4125 S.F. 34 3900 S.F. 35 3900 S.F. 36 3900 S.F. 37 3900 S.F. 38 3900 S.F. 39 3900 S.F. 40 3900 S.F. 41 3900 S.F. 42 3900 S.F. 433900 S.F. 22 3900 S.F. 23 3900 S.F. 24 3900 S.F. 25 3900 S.F. 26 3900 S.F. 27 3900 S.F. 28 3900 S.F. 29 3900 S.F. 30 4125 S.F. 31 2680 S.F. 268 2680 S.F. 267 2680 S.F. 266 2680 S.F. 265 2680 S.F. 264 2680 S.F. 263 2680 S.F. 262 2680 S.F. 261 2680 S.F. 260 2680 S.F. 259 2680 S.F. 256 2680 S.F. 255 2680 S.F. 254 2680 S.F. 253 2680 S.F. 252 2680 S.F. 251 2680 S.F. 250 2680 S.F. 249 2680 S.F. 248 2680 S.F. 247 3265 S.F. 1173107 S.F. 116 2834 S.F. 115 3487 S.F. 112 3472 S.F. 113 3128 S.F. 114 3169 S.F. 292 2680 S.F. 2823200 S.F. 283 3673 S.F. 284 4973 S.F. 290 3352 S.F. 291 2680 S.F. 286 2680 S.F. 287 2680 S.F. 288 3402 S.F. 273 3402 S.F. 272 3402 S.F. 271 3400 S.F. 276 3400 S.F. 277 3400 S.F. 278 2915 S.F. 279 3114 S.F. 309 2678 S.F. 308 2678 S.F. 307 2678 S.F. 306 2679 S.F. 305 2679 S.F. 304 2679 S.F. 303 2679 S.F. 302 2679 S.F. 301 2679 S.F. 300 2679 S.F. 299 2679 S.F. 298 2679 S.F. 297 3014 S.F. 296 3014 S.F. 295 7833 S.F. LOT N 50' 38' 3 8 ' 68' 68' 16 ' 4 7' 68'
4 4 ' 4 5 ' 4 4 ' 4 4 '
36' 16' 73'
75'
75'
75' 76' 72' 4 4 '
79' 60'
79' 4 4 '
68' 68' 4 0 ' 19 ' 75' 75' 5 ' 52' 75' 75' 4' 2 4 '
1 ' 2 4 ' 21' 75' 53' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 54' 75' 8'
96' 80' 50'
96' 50'
96' 50'
96' 50'
96' 52'
91' 35'
18'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 55'
79' 55'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 55' 75' 55'
75' 52' 76' 19 ' 33'
75' 52'
18'
86' 4 2 '
76' 55' 75' 55'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 55' 75' 55'
75' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 13'
41' 6' 67' 20'
49' 61' 42' 23'
45' 61'
42' 20' 73' 42' 23' 70'
47' 70' 39' 91'
40' 13' 74' 40' 67' 13' 40' 80' 40'
46' 45' 35' 46' 5' 40' 40' 37'
40' 95'
13'
3 3 ' 35' 5' 67' 40' 40' 67' 40'
67' 67' 40' 81' 42' 81' 24' 18'
42' 81' 26' 16'
42' 81' 28' 22' 18' 85' 24' 16' 85' 40'
26' 14' 40' 45' 40' 28' 45' 40'
73' 47' 65' 2 6 ' 21'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 45' 67' 45'
67' 45' 67' 45'
67' 272' 10 2' 126' 5 3 '
65' 15' 52' 50' 60' FUTURE SHANNON PARKWAY ALIGNMENT 2720 S.F. 221 2720 S.F. 220 2720 S.F. 219 2720 S.F. 218 2720 S.F. 217 2720 S.F. 216 2720 S.F. 215 2720 S.F. 214 2720 S.F. 213 2720 S.F. 212 2720 S.F. 209 2720 S.F. 208 2720 S.F. 207 2720 S.F. 206 2720 S.F. 205 2720 S.F. 204 2720 S.F. 203 2720 S.F. 202 2720 S.F. 201 2720 S.F. 200 2720 S.F. 198 2720 S.F. 197 2720 S.F. 196 2720 S.F. 195 2720 S.F. 194 2720 S.F. 193 2720 S.F. 192 2720 S.F. 191 2720 S.F. 190 2720 S.F. 187 2720 S.F. 186 2720 S.F. 185 2720 S.F. 184 2720 S.F. 183 2720 S.F. 182 2720 S.F. 181 2720 S.F. 180 2720 S.F. 17940' 68' 40' 68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 15' DEDICATE TO COV FOR POCKET PARK DEDICATE TO COV FOR POCKET PARK DEDICATE TO COV FOR POCKET PARK 4 7' 4 4'
68'
4 4'
68'
68'
68'
75'
75'
75' 3841 S.F. 4 23116 S.F. LOT R 1186 S.F. LOT C 54' 75' 63' 121' 52' 52' 52' 52' 52' 53' 55' 86' 44' 52' 52' 52' 42' 56'

7.6 ac MULTIFAMILY 3999 S.F. 16

7.51 ac GATE IN FENCE TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO STREET 281' TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ACCESS PROPOSED TEMPORARY STORMWATER BASIN 3019 S.F. 258 3087 S.F. 257 11062 S.F. LOT G 3139 S.F. 222 3149 S.F. 199 10423 S.F. LOT H 26' 26' 67' 49' 10' 4 0 '
67' 49' 67' 29'
28' 47'
67' 28' 64' 68' 68' 64'
28'
96'
68' 68'
28' 29' 68' 49' 48'
68' 49' 68' 29'
28' 48'
68' 28' 64' 67' 8'68' 56'
28'
95' 3378 S.F. 125 4214 S.F. LOT I 4492 S.F. 143 702 S.F. LOT E 3654 S.F. 142 3654 S.F. 141 3654 S.F. 140 3654 S.F. 139 3654 S.F. 138 3654 S.F. 137 3654 S.F. 136 3654 S.F. 135 3654 S.F. 134 3654 S.F. 133 3654 S.F. 132 3654 S.F. 131 3654 S.F. 130 4370 S.F. 129 4620 S.F. 128 4620 S.F. 127 4854 S.F. 126 3150 S.F. 124 3150 S.F. 123 4409 S.F. 122 4846 S.F. 121 4862 S.F. 120 4862 S.F. 119 29' 30' 3 5 ' 18' 47'
75'
18 ' 18' 32' 66' 82'
49 '
44' 16'
50'
23'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 23' 11' 31'42' 110' 11' 31'
42' 110' 11' 31' 47' 42' 21' 44' 110' 11' 33' 42' 75' 42' 75' 42' 75' 21' 21' 9' 66' 82' 9'21' 33' 114'
4 3 '
11' 31' 116' 16' 2 6 '11' 31' 116' 42'
11' 31' 116' 42' 4636 S.F. 130'
28' 77' 50'
96'
96'
47 ' 24' 98'
4 2 '
73' 6222 S.F. 33 4527 S.F. 3233' 5 3 ' 30' 3 9 ' 74'
75'
75' 74'
60 ' 26' 37'
75'
75' 7024 S.F. 59 6462 S.F. 58
7 4' 28' 6 2' 14'
52'
91'
79'
35'
52' 90'
27' 3 7'
86'
76' 4660 S.F. 734430 S.F. 454458 S.F. 444473 S.F. 21
28' 41'
79' 62'
59'
79' 62' 75' 42'
28' 55'
75' 28' 42' 75' 62'
55'
75' 62' 75' 42'
28' 55'
75' 4033 S.F. 20 3900 S.F. 19 4721 S.F. 74 3553 S.F. LOT A3692 S.F. LOT B 14' 46' 75' 52' 75' 2 6' 64'
55' 75'
85' 75' 57' 50' 21' 50' 75'
68'
14'50'
21' 41' 52' 58' 17' 54' 52' 43' 3472 S.F. 118 3533 S.F. 111 3432 S.F. 294 516 S.F. LOT M 61' 31'
2 4' 74' 47' 67' 42' 22' 54' 47' 13' 74'
37 ' 73'
4 6 ' 52' 67' 42'
14'
67' 10' 57' 15' 8 ' 38' 3315 S.F. 289 9729 S.F. LOT K 37' 67' 42' 35' 43' 40'
67' 37'
53' 61'
18'
4 5' 22' 107'
35' 4 4 ' 61' 39' 91'
4 4 ' 3083 S.F. 280 2819 S.F. 285 45' 73' 25'
28' 53' 45' 40' 47' 28' 25'
67' 35' 46' 40'
67' 2827 S.F. 269 2819 S.F. 246 3451 S.F. 270 25'
28' 47' 45'
67' 67' 45' 47' 28' 25'
67' 67'
25' 28' 61' 45' 28' 14' 5221 S.F. 274 3632 S.F. 275 2819 S.F. 281 2955 S.F. 293 61' 28' 47' 81' 22' 45' 85' 40'
18'
28' 65' 45' 85' 25' 47'
28' 25' 67' 45' 67' 40'
26' 48' 45' 73'
2 9 ' 74'
4 2 ' 2720 S.F. 178 2720 S.F. 177 2720 S.F. 176 2720 S.F. 175 2720 S.F. 174 2720 S.F. 173 2720 S.F. 172 2720 S.F. 171 2720 S.F. 170 2720 S.F. 169 8373 S.F. 234 3739 S.F. 233 2682 S.F. 232 2680 S.F. 231 2680 S.F. 230 2680 S.F. 229 2680 S.F. 228 2680 S.F. 227 2680 S.F. 226 2680 S.F. 225 2680 S.F. 224 2680 S.F. 22332' 8' 68' 40' 68'
95' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 2 ' 38'
68'
83' 76' 69' 6'
86' 4 0 '
86' 62'
68' 10 ' 30' 68' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 2966 S.F. 245 2680 S.F. 244 2680 S.F. 243 2680 S.F. 242 2680 S.F. 241 2680 S.F. 240 2680 S.F. 239 2680 S.F. 238 2680 S.F. 237 2680 S.F. 236 4130 S.F. 235 28' 31' 17' 48' 67' 27'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40' 5'
66' 10' 83'
3 6 ' 3 9 ' 2398 S.F. LOT F 4491 S.F. 145 4491 S.F. 146 4491 S.F. 147 4491 S.F. 148 4492 S.F. 149 4492 S.F. 150 4492 S.F. 151 4492 S.F. 152 4200 S.F. 153 3745 S.F. 154 4119 S.F. 155 5374 S.F. 144 10'
2 2 2 ' 30' 1'
4 2' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
111' 40'
112' 40'
99'
111' 40'
89'
99'
18 ' 22'
80' 6 0 '
35' 28' 33'
112' 43' 3 5 ' 2 4 ' 3212 S.F. 189 3203 S.F. 188 2872 S.F. 211 2864 S.F. 210 30' 28' 48' 50'
68' 68' 50' 48' 28' 30'
68' 68' 25'
28' 48' 45'
68' 68' 45' 48' 28' 25'
68' 68' 4546 S.F. 100
2'
75' 40'
32'
6 3 ' 52' DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK DEDICATE TO COV FOR POCKET PARK 4142 S.F. 17 7736 S.F. LOT O 3 9 ' 65'
85'
43' 0'
70'
65' 64' 5 5' 85'
64'
58' 109' 30657 S.F. LOT L 4037 S.F. 94 4089 S.F. 93 4089 S.F. 92 4089 S.F. 91 4089 S.F. 90 4089 S.F. 89 4089 S.F. 88 4089 S.F. 87 4089 S.F. 86 4089 S.F. 85 4089 S.F. 84 4089 S.F. 83 4090 S.F. 82 4090 S.F. 81 4090 S.F. 80 4346 S.F. 79 69' 219'
8'
78'
4 2 ' 2 0' 12 2 ' 53' 69' 12' 2 4' 19'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 52'
79' 56'
79' 30' 2 4 ' 3 '
72'
79' 4336 S.F. 95
78'
73'
5 3' 75' DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK 29138 S.F. LOT Q 52'
20'
32'
57'
64'
8'
25 3 ' 53'
62'
53'
42'
43'
42'
42'
42'
42'
42'
36'
21'
113' 63'
48'
52'
4 7'
68'
4 4'
68'
68'
4 4'
68'
68'
68'
68'
4 7'
68'
68'
5 3' 75'
52'
75'
52'
6 3 ' BLOCK WALL
SHANNON PARKWAY DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK DEDICATE TO COV FOR POCKET PARK 4053 S.F. 168 6666 S.F. 167 4611 S.F. 166 2992 S.F. 165 2680 S.F. 164 2680 S.F. 163 2680 S.F. 162 2680 S.F. 161 2680 S.F. 160 2680 S.F. 159 2685 S.F. 158 2201 S.F. LOT P 6449 S.F. 157 5330 S.F. 156 6' 62' 8' 87' 3 6 ' 68'
86'
68' 67' 68' 69' 41' 102' 37 '
87'
102' 84' 69'
37 ' 14 '
50' 67' 26'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'40'
14' 26' 2 0'
43' 78'
3 6'
86' 2 5 '
109'
4 2' 41' 6 0' 8 6' 2 5 '
3 8 '
109' 8 6 '
80' 6 0 '
89' DEDICATION TO COV FOR POCKET PARK SD CONNECTION TO PROPOSED STORMWATER BASIN. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO FUTURE COMMERCIAL BELISSA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF SHANNON RANCH CENTRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOL. 40 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 99, TCR, LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 18 SOUTH, 24 EAST, MDB&M, IN THE CITY OF VISALIA, COUNTY OF TULARE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUESTING CUP FOR DENSITY SPREAD AND LOT SIZES THAT DO NOT MEET THE R-1 AND RM ZONING STANDARDS.

NORTH 0' 100' VICINITY MAP
DEMAREE ST PROJECT LOCATION RIVERWAY DRIVE APN: 077-050-004, 077-050-006 TOTAL AREA: 59.84 AC. (GROSS) ± EXISTING ZONING: AE-40 (COUNTY) PROPOSED ZONING: R-1-5 (PD) EXISTING USE: VACANT PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW RESIDENTIAL MED DENSITY HIGH DENSITY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FLOOD ZONE: AE and X JURISDICTION: TULARE COUNTY - TO BE ANNEXED VISALIA UDB TIER: TIER 2 LAND USE TOTALS: AREA DU NET DENSITY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: 14.11 AC 159 11.27 DU/AC MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: 10.85 AC 150 13.76 DU/AC HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: 5.74 AC 168 29.24 DU/AC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL: 7.50 AC PARKS/OPEN SPACE: 2.57 AC MODOC DITCH (LOTS Q & R) 1.20 LOCAL STREETS 14.65 AC COLLECTOR/ARTERIAL STREETS: 2.97 AC LANDSCAPE LOTS: 0.25 AC TOTAL 59.84 AC 477 VMC TITLE 18 - AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE TOTAL PRIME FARMLAND: 59.84 ACRES EXCLUSIONS (PER VMC 18.04.060 (C): 20.19 ACRES REQUIRED AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION: 39.65 ACRES GROSS DENSITY CALCS: GROSS AREA DU GROSS DENSITY LDR: 27.9 AC 159 5.7 DU/AC MDR: 15.0 AC 150 10.0 DU/AC HDR: 7.6 AC 168 22.1 DU/AC PARK/OPEN SPACE: 2.57 AC LOT C: 0.03 AC; LOT D: 0.10 AC; LOT G: 0.25 AC; LOT H: 0.24 AC; LOT I: 0.10 AC; LOT J: 0.17 AC; LOT K: 0.22 AC; LOT L: 0.70 AC; LOT N: 0.18 AC; LOT O: 0.18 AC; LOT P: 0.05 AC; MFR PARKSPACE: 0.36 AC MIN. REQUIRED (5% OF RESIDENTIAL AREA): 2.52 AC NOTES - LOTS A - P TO BE PART OF A LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT AND DEDICATED TO CITY OF VISALIA WITH THIS MAP. - PHASE 1 MDR LOTS SHALL BE NOTIFIED THAT PHASE 2 HDR SITE MAY CONSTRUCT 2 AND/OR 3 STORY DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO THEM. - 20-FT REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIRED FOR LOTS 1-3 & 130-143. - ALL OFF-SITES TO BE INSTALLED WITH PHASE 1. - SANITARY SEWER AND WATER UTILITIES TO TIE INTO EXISTING LINES ALONG RIVERWAY DRIVE AND DEMAREE STREET- ALL LOTS TO CONNECT TO REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORMWATER BASIN. POTENTIAL CONNECTION TO EXISTING SD SYSTEM TBD DURING CIVIL DESIGN. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PUD) ANNEXATION AUGUST 28, 2023 PREPARED BY: 324 S. SANTA FE, STE. A VISALIA, CA 93292 TEL: 559.802.3052 FAX: 559.802.3215 www.4-creeks.com 1840
7223 S.F. LOT J 20.00' 10.00' TELPED R E DI 316.89 FH LTE RR R TELPED TELPED
SPIGOT
TELPED R E DI 316.89 FH LTE RR R TELPED
TELPED
SPIGOT
TELPED R E DI 316.89 FH LTE RR R TELPED
TELPED

SPIGOT RIVERWAY DRIVE

DEMAREE STREET

LINWOOD ST
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TIER 1 TIER 2 MODOC DITCH MODOC DITCH EXISTING WILDHORSE SUBDIVISION EXISTING 15" SS EXISTING 10" SS
PROPOSED 15" SS

EXISTING LOWERY RANCH
Remainder Parcel - Future development DEDICATION TO COV 4129 S.F. POCKET PARK 1103932 S.F. 1092934 S.F. 1083004 S.F. 1072934 S.F. 1062934 S.F. 1052934 S.F. 1042934 S.F. 1033043 S.F. 102 3450 S.F. 101 4008 S.F. 96 3893 S.F. 97 3900 S.F. 98 3900 S.F. 99 4158 S.F. 78 7372 S.F. 774404 S.F. 76 4274 S.F. 75 3813 S.F. 18 3975 S.F. 15 3900 S.F. 14 3900 S.F. 13 3900 S.F. 12 3900 S.F. 11 3900 S.F. 10 3900 S.F. 9 3900 S.F. 8 3900 S.F. 7 3900 S.F. 6 4050 S.F. 5 4223 S.F. LOT D 4825 S.F. 3 4825 S.F. 2 4417 S.F. 60 4108 S.F. 61 4108 S.F. 62 4345 S.F. 63 4108 S.F. 64 4108 S.F. 65 4108 S.F. 66 4108 S.F. 67 4108 S.F. 68 4108 S.F. 69 4108 S.F. 70 4108 S.F. 71 4108 S.F. 723900 S.F. 46 3900 S.F. 47 3900 S.F. 48 3900 S.F. 49 3900 S.F. 50 3900 S.F. 51 3900 S.F. 52 3900 S.F. 53 3900 S.F. 54 4125 S.F. 55 3906 S.F. 56 4508 S.F. 57 4125 S.F. 34 3900 S.F. 35 3900 S.F. 36 3900 S.F. 37 3900 S.F. 38 3900 S.F. 39 3900 S.F. 40 3900 S.F. 41 3900 S.F. 42 3900 S.F. 43 3900 S.F. 22 3900 S.F. 23 3900 S.F. 24 3900 S.F. 25 3900 S.F. 26 3900 S.F. 27 3900 S.F. 28 3900 S.F. 29 3900 S.F. 30 4125 S.F. 31 2680 S.F. 268 2680 S.F. 267 2680 S.F. 266 2680 S.F. 265 2680 S.F. 264 2680 S.F. 263 2680 S.F. 262 2680 S.F. 261 2680 S.F. 260 2680 S.F. 259 2680 S.F. 256 2680 S.F. 255 2680 S.F. 254 2680 S.F. 253 2680 S.F. 252 2680 S.F. 251 2680 S.F. 250 2680 S.F. 249 2680 S.F. 248 2680 S.F. 247 3265 S.F. 1173107 S.F. 1162834 S.F. 115 3487 S.F. 1123472 S.F. 113 3128 S.F. 114 3169 S.F. 292 2680 S.F. 282 3200 S.F. 283 3673 S.F. 284 4973 S.F. 290 3352 S.F. 291 2680 S.F. 286 2680 S.F. 287 2680 S.F. 288 3402 S.F. 273 3402 S.F. 272 3402 S.F. 271 3400 S.F. 276 3400 S.F. 277 3400 S.F. 278 2915 S.F. 279 3114 S.F. 309 2678 S.F. 308 2678 S.F. 307 2678 S.F. 306 2679 S.F. 305 2679 S.F. 304 2679 S.F. 303 2679 S.F. 302 2679 S.F. 301 2679 S.F. 300 2679 S.F. 299 2679 S.F. 298 2679 S.F. 297 3014 S.F. 296 3014 S.F. 295 7833 S.F. LOT N 50' 38' 3 8 ' 68' 68' 16 ' 47 ' 68' 4 4 ' 4 5 ' 4 4 ' 4 4 ' 36' 16' 73'75' 75' 75' 76' 72' 4 4 ' 79' 60' 79' 4 4 ' 68' 68' 4 0' 19 ' 75' 75' 5 ' 52' 75' 75' 4' 2 4 ' 11' 2 4 ' 21' 75' 53' 75' 75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 52' 75'
75' 54' 75' 8'
96' 80' 50'
96' 50'
96' 50'
96' 50'
96' 52' 91' 35' 18'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 55' 79' 55'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 55' 75' 55'
75' 52' 76' 19 ' 33'
75' 52' 18' 86' 4 2'
76' 55' 75' 55'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 52' 75' 52'
75' 55' 75' 55'
75' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 13' 41' 6' 67' 20' 49' 61' 42' 23' 45' 61'
42' 20' 73' 42' 23' 70' 47' 70' 39' 91'
40' 13' 74' 40' 67' 13' 40' 80' 40'
46' 45' 35' 46' 5' 40' 40' 37'
40' 95' 13' 3 3 ' 35' 5' 67' 40' 40' 67' 40'
67' 67' 40' 81' 42' 81' 24' 18'
42' 81' 26' 16'42' 81' 28' 22' 18' 85' 24' 16' 85' 40'
26' 14' 40' 45' 40' 28' 45' 40'
73' 47' 65' 2 6 ' 21'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 40' 67' 40'
67' 45' 67' 45'
67' 45' 67' 45'
67' 272' 10 2 ' 126' 5 3 '
65' 2720 S.F. 221 2720 S.F. 220 2720 S.F. 219 2720 S.F. 218 2720 S.F. 217 2720 S.F. 216 2720 S.F. 215 2720 S.F. 214 2720 S.F. 213 2720 S.F. 212 2720 S.F. 209 2720 S.F. 208 2720 S.F. 207 2720 S.F. 206 2720 S.F. 205 2720 S.F. 204 2720 S.F. 203 2720 S.F. 202 2720 S.F. 201 2720 S.F. 200 2720 S.F. 198 2720 S.F. 197 2720 S.F. 196 2720 S.F. 195 2720 S.F. 194 2720 S.F. 193 2720 S.F. 192 2720 S.F. 191 2720 S.F. 190 2720 S.F. 187 2720 S.F. 186 2720 S.F. 185 2720 S.F. 184 2720 S.F. 183 2720 S.F. 182 2720 S.F. 181 2720 S.F. 180 2720 S.F. 17940' 68' 40' 68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 40' 68' 40'
68' 4 7' 4 4' 68' 4 4 ' 68' 68' 68' 75' 75'
75' 3841 S.F. 4 23116 S.F. LOT R 1186 S.F. LOT C 54' 75' 63' 121' 52' 52' 52' 52' 52' 52' 52' 53' 55' 86' 44' 52' 42' 56' 7.6 ac MULTIFAMILY 3999 S.F. 16 7.51 ac SHANNON PARKWAY 3019 S.F. 258 3087 S.F. 25711062 S.F. LOT G 3139 S.F. 222 3149 S.F. 199 10423 S.F. LOT H26' 26' 67' 49' 10' 4 0 ' 67' 49' 67' 29' 28' 47'
67' 28' 64' 68' 68' 64' 28' 96'
68' 68' 28' 29' 68' 49' 48'
68' 49' 68' 29' 28' 48'
68' 28' 64' 67' 8'68' 56' 28' 95' 3378 S.F. 125 4214 S.F. LOT I 4492 S.F. 143 702 S.F. LOT E 3654 S.F. 142 3654 S.F. 141 3654 S.F. 140 3654 S.F. 139 3654 S.F. 138 3654 S.F. 137 3654 S.F. 136 3654 S.F. 135 3654 S.F. 134 3654 S.F. 133 3654 S.F. 132 3654 S.F. 131 3654 S.F. 130 4370 S.F. 129 4620 S.F. 128 4620 S.F. 127 4854 S.F. 126 3150 S.F. 124 3150 S.F. 123 4409 S.F. 122 4846 S.F. 121 4862 S.F. 120 4862 S.F. 119 29' 30' 3 5 ' 18' 47' 75' 18 ' 18' 32' 66' 82' 49 '
44' 16'
50' 23'
42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 42'
42' 87' 42'42' 87' 11' 23' 31'
42' 110' 11' 31'42' 110' 11' 31' 47' 42' 21' 44' 110' 11' 33' 42' 75' 42' 75' 42' 75' 21' 21' 9' 66' 82' 9'21' 33' 114' 43 '
11' 31' 116' 16' 2 6 '11' 31' 116' 42'11' 31' 116' 42' 4636 S.F. 130' 28' 77' 50' 96' 96' 4 7' 24' 98' 4 2' 73' 6222 S.F. 334527 S.F. 3233' 5 3 ' 30' 3 9 ' 74' 75' 75' 74' 60 ' 26' 37'
75' 75' 7024 S.F. 59 6462 S.F. 58 7 4' 28' 6 2' 14' 52' 91' 79' 35' 52' 90' 27' 3 7 ' 86' 76' 4660 S.F. 734430 S.F. 454458 S.F. 444473 S.F. 2128' 41' 79' 62' 59' 79' 62' 75' 42' 28' 55'
75' 28' 42' 75' 62' 55'
75' 62' 75' 42' 28' 55'
75' 4033 S.F. 20 3900 S.F. 19 4721 S.F. 74 3553 S.F. LOT A3692 S.F. LOT B 14' 46' 75' 52' 75' 26 ' 64' 55' 75'
85' 75' 57' 50' 21' 50' 75' 68' 14'50' 21' 41' 52' 58' 17' 54' 52' 43 ' 3472 S.F. 118 3533 S.F. 111 3432 S.F. 294 516 S.F. LOT M 61' 31' 2 4' 74' 47' 67' 42' 22' 54' 47' 13' 74' 37 ' 73' 46 ' 52' 67' 42' 14' 67' 10' 57' 15' 8 ' 38' 3315 S.F. 289 9729 S.F. LOT K 37' 67' 42' 35' 43' 40' 67' 37'53' 61' 18' 4 5' 22' 107' 35' 4 4 ' 61' 39' 91' 4 4' 3083 S.F. 280 2819 S.F. 285 45' 73' 25' 28' 53' 45' 40' 47' 28' 25' 67' 35' 46' 40'
67' 2827 S.F. 269 2819 S.F. 246 3451 S.F. 270 25' 28' 47' 45' 67' 67' 45' 47' 28' 25'
67' 67'
25' 28' 61' 45' 28' 14' 5221 S.F. 274 3632 S.F. 275 2819 S.F. 281 2955 S.F. 293 61' 28' 47' 81' 22' 45' 85' 40' 18' 28' 65' 45' 85' 25' 47' 28' 25' 67' 45' 67' 40' 26' 48' 45' 73' 2 9' 74' 4 2' 2720 S.F. 178 2720 S.F. 177 2720 S.F. 176 2720 S.F. 175 2720 S.F. 174 2720 S.F. 173 2720 S.F. 172 2720 S.F. 171 2720 S.F. 170 2720 S.F. 169 8373 S.F. 234 3739 S.F. 233 2682 S.F. 232 2680 S.F. 231 2680 S.F. 230 2680 S.F. 229 2680 S.F. 228 2680 S.F. 227 2680 S.F. 226 2680 S.F. 225 2680 S.F. 224 2680 S.F. 22332' 8' 68' 40' 68'
95' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 40'
68' 32' 8' 68' 2 ' 38'
68' 83' 76' 69' 6' 86' 40 ' 86' 62'
68' 10 ' 30' 68' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 40' 67' 8' 32'
67' 2966 S.F. 245 2680 S.F. 244 2680 S.F. 243 2680 S.F. 242 2680 S.F. 241 2680 S.F. 240 2680 S.F. 239 2680 S.F. 238 2680 S.F. 237 2680 S.F. 236 4130 S.F. 235 28' 31' 17' 48' 67' 27' 40' 67' 40'40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40' 5'
66' 10'83' 3 6' 3 9 ' 2398 S.F. LOT F 4491 S.F. 145 4491 S.F. 146 4491 S.F. 147 4491 S.F. 148 4492 S.F. 149 4492 S.F. 150 4492 S.F. 151 4492 S.F. 152 4200 S.F. 153 3745 S.F. 154 4119 S.F. 155 5374 S.F. 144 10' 2 ' 30' 1' 4 2' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
112' 40'
111' 40'
112' 40'
99'
111' 40' 89'
99' 18' 22' 80' 6 0 '
35' 28' 33'
112' 43' 3 5 ' 2 4' 3212 S.F. 189 3203 S.F. 188 2872 S.F. 211 2864 S.F. 210 30' 28' 48' 50' 68' 68' 50' 48' 28' 30'
68' 68' 25' 28' 48' 45'
68' 68' 45' 48' 28' 25'
68' 68' 4546 S.F. 1002' 75' 40' 32' 6 3 ' 52' DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK 4142 S.F. 17 7736 S.F. LOT O 39 ' 65' 85' 43 ' 0' 70' 65' 64' 5 5 ' 85' 64' 58' 109' 30657 S.F. LOT L 4037 S.F. 94 4089 S.F. 93 4089 S.F. 92 4089 S.F. 91 4089 S.F. 90 4089 S.F. 89 4089 S.F. 88 4089 S.F. 87 4089 S.F. 86 4089 S.F. 85 4089 S.F. 84 4089 S.F. 83 4090 S.F. 82 4090 S.F. 81 4090 S.F. 80 4346 S.F. 79 69' 219'8' 78' 4 2' 2 0' 12 2 ' 53' 69' 12 ' 2 4' 19'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 52' 79' 52'
79' 56' 79' 30' 2 4 ' 3 ' 72' 79' 4336 S.F. 95 78' 73' 5 3 ' 75' DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK 29138 S.F. LOT Q 52' 20' 32' 57' 64' 8' 25 3 ' 53' 62' 53' 42' 43' 42' 42' 42' 42' 42' 36' 21' 113' 63' 48' 52' 4 7' 68' 4 4' 68' 68' 4 4 ' 68' 68' 68' 68' 47 ' 68' 68' 5 3 ' 75' 52' 75' 52' 6 3 ' SHANNON PARKWAY DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK DEDICATION TO COV POCKET PARK 4053 S.F. 168 6666 S.F. 167 4611 S.F. 166 2992 S.F. 165 2680 S.F. 164 2680 S.F. 163 2680 S.F. 162 2680 S.F. 161 2680 S.F. 160 2680 S.F. 159 2685 S.F. 158 2201 S.F. LOT P 6449 S.F. 157 5330 S.F. 156 6' 62' 8' 87' 3 6 ' 68' 86' 68' 67' 68' 69' 41' 102' 3 7 ' 87'102' 84' 69' 3 7' 14 ' 50' 67' 26'40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'
40' 67' 40'40' 14 ' 26' 2 0'
43' 78' 3 6 '
86' 2 5 ' 109' 4 2' 41' 6 0 ' 8 6 ' 2 5 ' 3 8 ' 109' 8 6 ' 80' 6 0 ' 89' DEDICATION TO COV FOR POCKET PARK BELISSA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF SHANNON RANCH CENTRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOL. 40 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 99, TCR, LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 18 SOUTH, 24 EAST, MDB&M, IN THE CITY OF VISALIA, COUNTY OF TULARE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUESTING CUP FOR DENSITY SPREAD AND LOT SIZES THAT DO NOT MEET THE R-1 AND RM ZONING STANDARDS.

NORTH 0' 120' VICINITY MAP
DEMAREE ST PROJECT LOCATION RIVERWAY DRIVE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PUD) ANNEXATION AUGUST 28, 2023 PREPARED BY: 324 S. SANTA FE, STE. A VISALIA, CA 93292 TEL: 559.802.3052 FAX: 559.802.3215 www.4-creeks.com APN: 077-050-004, 077-050-006 TOTAL AREA: 59.84 AC. (GROSS) ± EXISTING ZONING: AE-40 (COUNTY) PROPOSED ZONING: R-1-5 (PD) EXISTING USE: VACANT PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW RESIDENTIAL MED DENSITY HIGH DENSITY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FLOOD ZONE: AE and X JURISDICTION: TULARE COUNTY - TO BE ANNEXED VISALIA UDB TIER: TIER 2 LAND USE TOTALS: AREA DU NET DENSITY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: 14.11 AC 159 11.27 DU/AC MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: 10.85 AC 150 13.76 DU/AC HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: 5.74 AC 168 29.24 DU/AC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL: 7.50 AC PARKS/OPEN SPACE: 2.57 AC MODOC DITCH (LOTS Q & R) 1.20 LOCAL STREETS 14.65 AC COLLECTOR/ARTERIAL STREETS: 2.97 AC LANDSCAPE LOTS: 0.25 AC TOTAL 59.84 AC 477 VMC TITLE 18 - AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION ORDINANCE TOTAL PRIME FARMLAND: 59.84 ACRES EXCLUSIONS (PER VMC 18.04.060 (C): 20.19 ACRES REQUIRED AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION: 39.65 ACRES GROSS DENSITY CALCS: GROSS AREA DU GROSS DENSITY LDR: 27.9 AC 159 5.7 DU/AC MDR: 15.0 AC 150 10.0 DU/AC HDR: 7.6 AC 168 22.1 DU/AC PARK/OPEN SPACE: 2.57 AC LOT C: 0.03 AC; LOT D: 0.10 AC; LOT G: 0.25 AC; LOT H: 0.24 AC; LOT I: 0.10 AC; LOT J: 0.17 AC; LOT K: 0.22 AC; LOT L: 0.70 AC; LOT N: 0.18 AC; LOT O: 0.18 AC; LOT P: 0.05 AC; MFR PARKSPACE: 0.36 AC MIN. REQUIRED (5% OF RESIDENTIAL AREA): 2.52 AC NOTES - LOTS A - P TO BE PART OF A LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT AND DEDICATED TO CITY OF VISALIA WITH THIS MAP. - PHASE 1 MDR LOTS SHALL BE NOTIFIED THAT PHASE 2 HDR SITE MAY CONSTRUCT 2 AND/OR 3 STORY DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO THEM. - 20-FT REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIRED FOR LOTS 1-3 & 130-143. - ALL OFF-SITES TO BE INSTALLED WITH PHASE 1. - SANITARY SEWER AND WATER UTILITIES TO TIE INTO EXISTING LINES ALONG RIVERWAY DRIVE AND DEMAREE STREET - ALL LOTS TO CONNECT TO REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORMWATER BASIN. POTENTIAL CONNECTION TO EXISTING SD SYSTEM TBD DURING CIVIL DESIGN. 1841
0 0
� �I 300'
0 ("!
t--- N 0 .....
� �
0 0
ANNEXATION NO. 2022-- �
A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14-18/24, MDB&M AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 13-18/24, MDB&M

SITE DATA
ADDRESS:

APN:

AREA:
31769 ROAD 108, VISALIA CA 93291
0TT-050-018, 0TT-050-019, 078-010-022

59.37 AC.±

VICINITY MAP

EXISTING CITY LIMITS

PROPOSED CITY LIMITS
© COURSE NUMBER
N. LINE OF S1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF I i Iii 077-050-012 _§EC. 14-18/24 7 _______________ L, APN 077-050-003 I I I I I 0' 300'
SCALE 1 "=300'
@ S89° 48' 34"E 26i

5.68'± 1,, f:>c
\ \<t'> I
I }-I
0,
<v\ 1 �
s�Sr d�
�- � IW �
/1._�,4 o I,... ...__, \�� � � 9 �� 0 w 0 �0 C -
-5,,,� APN 077-050-019 o s: 9 ' a::: 00 N1/�\0F SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC. 14-18/24 ? � \ @N89° 37' 36"W 10.00'± , o Z
\ (D S00° 01' 47"W 20.00'±'o 7 I Q �
\ S. LINE OF N 1/2 OF SE 1/4l �"
\ OF NE 1/4 OF SEC. 14-18/24 � 1
SW1/4 OF NE1/4IOF SEC. 14-18/24
____
8 N89°
48'34"W 1318.16'±
APN 077-050-018 I APN 077-600-056 _, j 7-1-T ,�r--Ei---==- r
:::--7x 7 i! I
+1
" - ""1 . 1 I I 077-60 -0471 I l 1
1 APN 011-600-051•� • _ ""1t:iL� X�APN
1 077-6do-C -1... .J:.�:.-9-v,-,-
1 l :J' I APN 077-600-058-� • _ ""1
�! ,,".AfN, 077-600-01
41 -1- 7 c- 7 I:

I APN077 600 059 .. w o- _APN.017-6..011:055_ - - - I - - - -J l1 , 6 - - s: - ...Jzi --r-� I I ""\wJ□[b@ GD@oo@rnT I I i 1.-: 20.00-R AD RW, BK. 2, • 7 :i: -+- _ vJ&OO©[}{] OO@ 11f-- _ _ _ _j ,1 � PG.610OFRW APN077-600-060-� -�ul _ __j__ 7 r -- «ooli'Ml�� o@i-OD t- 7 I - l__ '*I I APN 077-600-061_.,g �0[1,@ OOOO@(g' 1 \ I . I I • 1 \ '7<t' I O OO&OO©frDg 00@0 � --'Anner
tlon 2004-06 ;- - .JI� I \
S. LINE OF SW 1/4 OF NE APN 077-600-062 _.,.� «OO[M] �'ilo®®D 1�-- _ J L _ I ✓-'\ I lo
1/4 OF SEC. 14-18/?4 @ APN 077-600-063 � l I I 1 / \ j L 7 / '- I j L _ -;·
I
N89°
48'33"W 1318 47'+ Q -=:J '=-.L...L __ �_J- _ _L_L __ �
N"l!lrr I /
. , , . . , ..._, ......
• -_ J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RIVERWAY AVENUE ___ _
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------- 7 I µ __ J __
APN077-060-024 Annexatiop 2005-04 APN077-060-022 I
I I
I l
1842