Agenda packet — Visalia City Council, May 20, 2024 (part 3 of 5)

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2024

0.2441

2.0428

2.2572

6.3000e-
003

0.4952

0.0750

0.5702

0.1785

0.0698

0.2483

0.0000
570.0257
570.0257

0.0796

0.0282
580.4107
2025

0.3445

2.6419

3.5113

0.0111

0.5692

0.0769

0.6461

0.1545

0.0724

0.2269

0.0000
1,016.311
7 1,016.311
7 0.0815

0.0673
1,038.409
9 2026

6.8313

0.1289

0.2227

4.4000e-
004

0.0143

5.6200e-
003

0.0199

3.8400e-
003

5.2300e-
003

9.0700e-
003

0.0000

39.6746

7.6800e-
003

9.0000e-
004

40.1352
Maximum

6.8313

2.6419

3.5113

0.0111

0.5692

0.0769

0.6461

0.1785

0.0724

0.2483

0.0000
1,016.311
7 1,016.311
7 0.0815

0.0673
1,038.409
9 Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2024

0.2441

2.0428

2.2572

6.3000e-
003

0.4952

0.0750

0.5702

0.1785

0.0698

0.2483

0.0000
570.0253
570.0253

0.0796

0.0282
580.4104
2025

0.3445

2.6419

3.5113

0.0111

0.5692

0.0769

0.6461

0.1545

0.0724

0.2269

0.0000
1,016.311
3 1,016.311
3 0.0815

0.0673
1,038.409
6 2026

6.8313

0.1289

0.2227

4.4000e-
004

0.0143

5.6200e-
003

0.0199

3.8400e-
003

5.2300e-
003

9.0700e-
003

0.0000

39.6745

7.6800e-
003

9.0000e-
004

40.1352
Maximum

6.8313

2.6419

3.5113

0.0111

0.5692

0.0769

0.6461

0.1785

0.0724

0.2483

0.0000
1,016.311
3 1,016.311
3 0.0815

0.0673
1,038.409
6 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 3 of 34 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 386
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 5-7-2024
8-6-2024

1.0149

1.0149
2 8-7-2024
11-6-2024

0.7943

0.7943
3 11-7-2024
2-6-2025

0.7862

0.7862
4 2-7-2025
5-6-2025

0.7302

0.7302
5 5-7-2025
8-6-2025

0.7459

0.7459
6 8-7-2025
11-6-2025

0.7519

0.7519
7 11-7-2025
2-6-2026

1.5672

1.5672
8 2-7-2026
5-6-2026

5.8549

5.8549
Highest

5.8549

5.8549
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 4 of 34 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Energy

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
2,212.276
8 2,212.276
8 0.1426

0.0281
2,224.219
2 Mobile

1.2632

2.1748

11.5138

0.0279

2.8409

0.0248

2.8657

0.7602

0.0233

0.7835

0.0000
2,581.314
1 2,581.314
1 0.1365

0.1469
2,628.502
9 Waste

0.0000

0.0000
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Water

0.0000

71.9050
217.4953
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Total

5.8415

2.7956

12.0442

0.0316

2.8409

0.0720

2.9129

0.7602

0.0705

0.8307
318.6040
5,011.103
8 5,329.707
8 22.2624

0.3516
5,991.049
0 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 5 of 34 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Energy

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
2,212.276
8 2,212.276
8 0.1426

0.0281
2,224.219
2 Mobile

1.2632

2.1748

11.5138

0.0279

2.8409

0.0248

2.8657

0.7602

0.0233

0.7835

0.0000
2,581.314
1 2,581.314
1 0.1365

0.1469
2,628.502
9 Waste

0.0000

0.0000
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Water

0.0000

71.9050
217.4953
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Total

5.8415

2.7956

12.0442

0.0316

2.8409

0.0720

2.9129

0.7602

0.0705

0.8307
318.6040
5,011.103
8 5,329.707
8 22.2624

0.3516
5,991.049
0 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 6 of 34 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 389
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
8/6/2024
1/5/2026
5 370
5 Paving
Paving
1/6/2026
2/2/2026
5 20
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/3/2026
3/2/2026
5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.29 Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.48 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,470,150; Non-Residential Outdoor: 490,050; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 105
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 7 of 34 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0224

0.2088

0.1971

3.9000e-
004

9.6000e-
003

8.9200e-
003

0.0000

33.9961

9.5100e-
003

0.0000

34.2338
Total

0.0224

0.2088

0.1971

3.9000e-
004

9.6000e-
003

8.9200e-
003

0.0000

33.9961

9.5100e-
003

0.0000

34.2338
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 412.00
161.00

0.00 10.80

7.30 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 82.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 8 of 34 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9277

3.0000e-
005

0.9361
Total

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9277

3.0000e-
005

0.9361
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0224

0.2088

0.1971

3.9000e-
004

9.6000e-
003

8.9200e-
003

0.0000

33.9960

9.5100e-
003

0.0000

34.2338
Total

0.0224

0.2088

0.1971

3.9000e-
004

9.6000e-
003

8.9200e-
003

0.0000

33.9960

9.5100e-
003

0.0000

34.2338
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 9 of 34 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9277

3.0000e-
005

0.9361
Total

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9277

3.0000e-
005

0.9361
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0983

0.0000

0.0983

0.0505

0.0000

0.0505

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0133

0.1359

0.0917

1.9000e-
004

6.1500e-
003

5.6600e-
003

0.0000

16.7285

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8638
Total

0.0133

0.1359

0.0917

1.9000e-
004

0.0983

6.1500e-
003

0.1044

0.0505

5.6600e-
003

0.0562

0.0000

16.7285

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8638
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 10 of 34 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.6000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5566

2.0000e-
005

0.5617
Total

2.6000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5566

2.0000e-
005

0.5617
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0983

0.0000

0.0983

0.0505

0.0000

0.0505

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0133

0.1359

0.0917

1.9000e-
004

6.1500e-
003

5.6500e-
003

0.0000

16.7285

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8638
Total

0.0133

0.1359

0.0917

1.9000e-
004

0.0983

6.1500e-
003

0.1044

0.0505

5.6500e-
003

0.0562

0.0000

16.7285

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8638
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 11 of 34 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.6000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5566

2.0000e-
005

0.5617
Total

2.6000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5566

2.0000e-
005

0.5617
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.1611

0.0000

0.1611

0.0639

0.0000

0.0639

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0563

0.5666

0.4852

1.0900e-
003

0.0234

0.0215

0.0000

95.4092

0.0309

0.0000

96.1806
Total

0.0563

0.5666

0.4852

1.0900e-
003

0.1611

0.0234

0.1844

0.0639

0.0215

0.0854

0.0000

95.4092

0.0309

0.0000

96.1806
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 12 of 34 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0100e-
003

6.5000e-
004

8.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.1645

6.0000e-
005

2.1843
Total

1.0100e-
003

6.5000e-
004

8.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.1645

6.0000e-
005

2.1843
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.1611

0.0000

0.1611

0.0639

0.0000

0.0639

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0563

0.5666

0.4852

1.0900e-
003

0.0234

0.0215

0.0000

95.4091

0.0309

0.0000

96.1805
Total

0.0563

0.5666

0.4852

1.0900e-
003

0.1611

0.0234

0.1844

0.0639

0.0215

0.0854

0.0000

95.4091

0.0309

0.0000

96.1805
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 13 of 34 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0100e-
003

6.5000e-
004

8.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.1645

6.0000e-
005

2.1843
Total

1.0100e-
003

6.5000e-
004

8.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.1645

6.0000e-
005

2.1843
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0780

0.7125

0.8568

1.4300e-
003

0.0325

0.0306

0.0000
122.8800
122.8800

0.0291

0.0000
123.6065
Total

0.0780

0.7125

0.8568

1.4300e-
003

0.0325

0.0306

0.0000
122.8800
122.8800

0.0291

0.0000
123.6065
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 14 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

9.1600e-
003

0.3775

0.1127

1.6900e-
003

0.0566

2.4600e-
003

0.0590

0.0164

2.3500e-
003

0.0187

0.0000
162.3214
162.3214

6.7000e-
004

0.0243
169.5719
Worker

0.0632

0.0405

0.5002

1.4700e-
003

0.1746

8.7000e-
004

0.1755

0.0464

8.0000e-
004

0.0472

0.0000
135.0417
135.0417

3.9600e-
003

3.8000e-
003
136.2722
Total

0.0723

0.4179

0.6129

3.1600e-
003

0.2312

3.3300e-
003

0.2345

0.0628

3.1500e-
003

0.0659

0.0000
297.3631
297.3631

4.6300e-
003

0.0281
305.8440
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0780

0.7125

0.8568

1.4300e-
003

0.0325

0.0306

0.0000
122.8799
122.8799

0.0291

0.0000
123.6063
Total

0.0780

0.7125

0.8568

1.4300e-
003

0.0325

0.0306

0.0000
122.8799
122.8799

0.0291

0.0000
123.6063
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 15 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

9.1600e-
003

0.3775

0.1127

1.6900e-
003

0.0566

2.4600e-
003

0.0590

0.0164

2.3500e-
003

0.0187

0.0000
162.3214
162.3214

6.7000e-
004

0.0243
169.5719
Worker

0.0632

0.0405

0.5002

1.4700e-
003

0.1746

8.7000e-
004

0.1755

0.0464

8.0000e-
004

0.0472

0.0000
135.0417
135.0417

3.9600e-
003

3.8000e-
003
136.2722
Total

0.0723

0.4179

0.6129

3.1600e-
003

0.2312

3.3300e-
003

0.2345

0.0628

3.1500e-
003

0.0659

0.0000
297.3631
297.3631

4.6300e-
003

0.0281
305.8440
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Total

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 16 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0220

0.9262

0.2717

4.0900e-
003

0.1393

6.0500e-
003

0.1454

0.0403

5.7900e-
003

0.0460

0.0000
392.4017
392.4017

1.5900e-
003

0.0586
409.9134
Worker

0.1440

0.0884

1.1405

3.5000e-
003

0.4298

2.0400e-
003

0.4319

0.1143

1.8800e-
003

0.1161

0.0000
321.2550
321.2550

8.7700e-
003

8.6900e-
003
324.0630
Total

0.1660

1.0147

1.4123

7.5900e-
003

0.5692

8.0900e-
003

0.5773

0.1545

7.6700e-
003

0.1622

0.0000
713.6568
713.6568

0.0104

0.0673
733.9764
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Total

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 17 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0220

0.9262

0.2717

4.0900e-
003

0.1393

6.0500e-
003

0.1454

0.0403

5.7900e-
003

0.0460

0.0000
392.4017
392.4017

1.5900e-
003

0.0586
409.9134
Worker

0.1440

0.0884

1.1405

3.5000e-
003

0.4298

2.0400e-
003

0.4319

0.1143

1.8800e-
003

0.1161

0.0000
321.2550
321.2550

8.7700e-
003

8.6900e-
003
324.0630
Total

0.1660

1.0147

1.4123

7.5900e-
003

0.5692

8.0900e-
003

0.5773

0.1545

7.6700e-
003

0.1622

0.0000
713.6568
713.6568

0.0104

0.0673
733.9764
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

2.0500e-
003

0.0187

0.0241

4.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

0.0000

3.4788

8.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.4992
Total

2.0500e-
003

0.0187

0.0241

4.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

0.0000

3.4788

8.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.4992
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 18 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.5000e-
004

0.0106

3.0700e-
003

5.0000e-
005

1.6000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.6000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000

4.4256

2.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

4.6229
Worker

1.5400e-
003

9.1000e-
004

0.0123

4.0000e-
005

4.9400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.9600e-
003

1.3100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.3300e-
003

0.0000

3.5795

9.0000e-
005

3.6096
Total

1.7900e-
003

0.0115

0.0154

9.0000e-
005

6.5400e-
003

9.0000e-
005

6.6300e-
003

1.7700e-
003

9.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

8.0050

1.1000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

8.2325
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

2.0500e-
003

0.0187

0.0241

4.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

0.0000

3.4788

8.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.4992
Total

2.0500e-
003

0.0187

0.0241

4.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

0.0000

3.4788

8.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.4992
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 19 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.5000e-
004

0.0106

3.0700e-
003

5.0000e-
005

1.6000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.6000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000

4.4256

2.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

4.6229
Worker

1.5400e-
003

9.1000e-
004

0.0123

4.0000e-
005

4.9400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.9600e-
003

1.3100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.3300e-
003

0.0000

3.5795

9.0000e-
005

3.6096
Total

1.7900e-
003

0.0115

0.0154

9.0000e-
005

6.5400e-
003

9.0000e-
005

6.6300e-
003

1.7700e-
003

9.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

8.0050

1.1000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

8.2325
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

9.1500e-
003

0.0858

0.1458

2.3000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

3.8500e-
003

0.0000

20.0193

6.4700e-
003

0.0000

20.1811
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

9.1500e-
003

0.0858

0.1458

2.3000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

3.8500e-
003

0.0000

20.0193

6.4700e-
003

0.0000

20.1811
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 20 of 34 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.7000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.9900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.8688

2.0000e-
005

0.8761
Total

3.7000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.9900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.8688

2.0000e-
005

0.8761
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

9.1500e-
003

0.0858

0.1458

2.3000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

3.8500e-
003

0.0000

20.0192

6.4700e-
003

0.0000

20.1811
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

9.1500e-
003

0.0858

0.1458

2.3000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

3.8500e-
003

0.0000

20.0192

6.4700e-
003

0.0000

20.1811
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 21 of 34 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.7000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.9900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.8688

2.0000e-
005

0.8761
Total

3.7000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.9900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.8688

2.0000e-
005

0.8761
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

6.8142

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.7100e-
003

0.0115

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5567
Total

6.8159

0.0115

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5567
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 22 of 34 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0500e-
003

1.2100e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

6.5600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000

4.7494

1.2000e-
004

4.7895
Total

2.0500e-
003

1.2100e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

6.5600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000

4.7494

1.2000e-
004

4.7895
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

6.8142

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.7100e-
003

0.0115

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5567
Total

6.8159

0.0115

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5567
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 23 of 34 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0500e-
003

1.2100e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

6.5600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000

4.7494

1.2000e-
004

4.7895
Total

2.0500e-
003

1.2100e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

6.5600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000

4.7494

1.2000e-
004

4.7895
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 24 of 34 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.2632

2.1748

11.5138

0.0279

2.8409

0.0248

2.8657

0.7602

0.0233

0.7835

0.0000
2,581.314
1 2,581.314
1 0.1365

0.1469
2,628.502
9 Unmitigated

1.2632

2.1748

11.5138

0.0279

2.8409

0.0248

2.8657

0.7602

0.0233

0.7835

0.0000
2,581.314
1 2,581.314
1 0.1365

0.1469
2,628.502
9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Industrial Park
3,302.94
2,489.45
1215.32
7,573,137
7,573,137
Total
3,302.94
2,489.45
1,215.32
7,573,137
7,573,137
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Industrial Park

9.50 7.30

7.30 59.00

28.00 13.00
79 19
2 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Industrial Park

0.522587

0.052580

0.171418

0.151108

0.026705

0.007202

0.013509

0.026273

0.000644

0.000311

0.023009

0.001408

0.003247
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 25 of 34 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000
1,536.536
7 1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000
1,536.536
7 1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 26 of 34 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Industrial Park

1.26629e
+007

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
Total

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Industrial Park

1.26629e
+007

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
Total

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 27 of 34 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Industrial Park

8.66408e
+006
1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Total
1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Industrial Park

8.66408e
+006
1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Total
1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 28 of 34 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 411
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Unmitigated

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.6814

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8278

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

8.3000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Total

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 29 of 34 ends

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.6814

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8278

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

8.3000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Total

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 30 of 34 ends

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Unmitigated
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Industrial Park
226.648 /
0 289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Total
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 31 of 34 ends

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Industrial Park
226.648 /
0 289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Total
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Unmitigated
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 32 of 34 ends

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Industrial Park
1215.32
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Total
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Industrial Park
1215.32
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Total
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 33 of 34 ends

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 34 of 34 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 417
Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Land Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Energy Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Industrial Park
980.10
1000sqft

22.50 980,100.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.7 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2026
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 1 of 29 ends

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 2 of 29 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

3.2849

32.4114

29.1392

0.0891

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,982.058
8 8,982.058
8 1.9475

0.5795
9,172.187
4 2025

2.8143

19.8871

28.1870

0.0875

4.4760

0.5895

5.0656

1.2121

0.5550

1.7670

0.0000
8,817.405
3 8,817.405
3 0.6854

0.5646
9,002.791
3 2026
681.8210

19.7859

27.5189

0.0860

4.4760

0.5886

5.0646

1.2121

0.5541

1.7662

0.0000
8,664.263
4 8,664.263
4 0.7161

0.5505
8,845.270
1 Maximum
681.8210

32.4114

29.1392

0.0891

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,982.058
8 8,982.058
8 1.9475

0.5795
9,172.187
4 Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

3.2849

32.4114

29.1392

0.0891

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,982.058
8 8,982.058
8 1.9475

0.5795
9,172.187
4 2025

2.8143

19.8871

28.1870

0.0875

4.4760

0.5895

5.0656

1.2121

0.5550

1.7670

0.0000
8,817.405
3 8,817.405
3 0.6854

0.5646
9,002.791
3 2026
681.8210

19.7859

27.5189

0.0860

4.4760

0.5886

5.0646

1.2121

0.5541

1.7662

0.0000
8,664.263
4 8,664.263
4 0.7161

0.5505
8,845.270
1 Maximum
681.8210

32.4114

29.1392

0.0891

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,982.058
8 8,982.058
8 1.9475

0.5795
9,172.187
4 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 3 of 29 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 420
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 4 of 29 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Energy

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mobile

9.6056

12.8586

77.1740

0.1861

18.3338

0.1559

18.4897

4.8951

0.1465

5.0416
18,979.98
52 18,979.98
52 0.9021

0.9919
19,298.13
32 Total

34.6969

16.2608

80.1309

0.2065

18.3338

0.4148

18.7486

4.8951

0.4053

5.3004
23,061.71
21 23,061.71
21 0.9809

1.0668
23,404.12
83 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Energy

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mobile

9.6056

12.8586

77.1740

0.1861

18.3338

0.1559

18.4897

4.8951

0.1465

5.0416
18,979.98
52 18,979.98
52 0.9021

0.9919
19,298.13
32 Total

34.6969

16.2608

80.1309

0.2065

18.3338

0.4148

18.7486

4.8951

0.4053

5.3004
23,061.71
21 23,061.71
21 0.9809

1.0668
23,404.12
83 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 5 of 29 ends

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
5/7/2024
6/3/2024
5 20
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
6/4/2024
6/17/2024
5 10
3 Grading
Grading
6/18/2024
8/5/2024
5 35
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
8/6/2024
1/5/2026
5 370
5 Paving
Paving
1/6/2026
2/2/2026
5 20
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/3/2026
3/2/2026
5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.29 Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,470,150; Non-Residential Outdoor: 490,050; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 105
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 6 of 29 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.48 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 412.00
161.00

0.00 10.80

7.30 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 82.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 7 of 29 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.8922
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Total

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.8922
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0501

0.0259

0.3960

1.1000e-
003

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332
111.1575
111.1575

2.8700e-
003

2.7400e-
003
112.0464
Total

0.0501

0.0259

0.3960

1.1000e-
003

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332
111.1575
111.1575

2.8700e-
003

2.7400e-
003
112.0464
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 8 of 29 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Total

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0501

0.0259

0.3960

1.1000e-
003

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332
111.1575
111.1575

2.8700e-
003

2.7400e-
003
112.0464
Total

0.0501

0.0259

0.3960

1.1000e-
003

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332
111.1575
111.1575

2.8700e-
003

2.7400e-
003
112.0464
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 9 of 29 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

19.6570

0.0000

19.6570

10.1025

0.0000

10.1025

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

1.2294

1.1310

1.1310
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Total

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

19.6570

1.2294

20.8864

10.1025

1.1310

11.2335
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0601

0.0310

0.4752

1.3200e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
133.3890
133.3890

3.4500e-
003

3.2900e-
003
134.4557
Total

0.0601

0.0310

0.4752

1.3200e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
133.3890
133.3890

3.4500e-
003

3.2900e-
003
134.4557
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 10 of 29 ends

19.6570

0.0000

19.6570

10.1025

0.0000

10.1025

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

1.2294

1.1310

0.0000
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Total

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

19.6570

1.2294

20.8864

10.1025

1.1310

11.2335

0.0000
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0601

0.0310

0.4752

1.3200e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
133.3890
133.3890

3.4500e-
003

3.2900e-
003
134.4557
Total

0.0601

0.0310

0.4752

1.3200e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
133.3890
133.3890

3.4500e-
003

3.2900e-
003
134.4557
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 11 of 29 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

9.2036

0.0000

9.2036

3.6538

0.0000

3.6538

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

1.3354

1.2286

1.2286
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Total

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

9.2036

1.3354

10.5390

3.6538

1.2286

4.8823
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0668

0.0345

0.5280

1.4700e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
148.2100
148.2100

3.8300e-
003

3.6600e-
003
149.3952
Total

0.0668

0.0345

0.5280

1.4700e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
148.2100
148.2100

3.8300e-
003

3.6600e-
003
149.3952
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 12 of 29 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

9.2036

0.0000

9.2036

3.6538

0.0000

3.6538

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

1.3354

1.2286

0.0000
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Total

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

9.2036

1.3354

10.5390

3.6538

1.2286

4.8823

0.0000
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0668

0.0345

0.5280

1.4700e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
148.2100
148.2100

3.8300e-
003

3.6600e-
003
149.3952
Total

0.0668

0.0345

0.5280

1.4700e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
148.2100
148.2100

3.8300e-
003

3.6600e-
003
149.3952
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 13 of 29 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.5769
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Total

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.5769
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1789

6.8099

2.0953

0.0319

1.0916

0.0463

1.1379

0.3143

0.0443

0.3587
3,373.235
0 3,373.235
0 0.0142

0.5042
3,523.838
3 Worker

1.3752

0.7100

10.8771

0.0302

3.3845

0.0165

3.4010

0.8977

0.0152

0.9129
3,053.124
9 3,053.124
9 0.0789

0.0753
3,077.541
5 Total

1.5541

7.5199

12.9724

0.0621

4.4760

0.0628

4.5388

1.2120

0.0595

1.2715
6,426.359
9 6,426.359
9 0.0931

0.5795
6,601.379
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 14 of 29 ends

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Total

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1789

6.8099

2.0953

0.0319

1.0916

0.0463

1.1379

0.3143

0.0443

0.3587
3,373.235
0 3,373.235
0 0.0142

0.5042
3,523.838
3 Worker

1.3752

0.7100

10.8771

0.0302

3.3845

0.0165

3.4010

0.8977

0.0152

0.9129
3,053.124
9 3,053.124
9 0.0789

0.0753
3,077.541
5 Total

1.5541

7.5199

12.9724

0.0621

4.4760

0.0628

4.5388

1.2120

0.0595

1.2715
6,426.359
9 6,426.359
9 0.0931

0.5795
6,601.379
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 15 of 29 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1747

6.7870

2.0509

0.0313

1.0916

0.0463

1.1379

0.3143

0.0443

0.3586
3,311.811
4 3,311.811
4 0.0136

0.4946
3,459.543
2 Worker

1.2722

0.6305

10.0515

0.0292

3.3845

0.0157

3.4001

0.8977

0.0144

0.9121
2,949.119
5 2,949.119
5 0.0709

0.0700
2,971.750
0 Total

1.4469

7.4175

12.1024

0.0605

4.4760

0.0620

4.5380

1.2121

0.0587

1.2708
6,260.930
9 6,260.930
9 0.0845

0.5646
6,431.293
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 16 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1747

6.7870

2.0509

0.0313

1.0916

0.0463

1.1379

0.3143

0.0443

0.3586
3,311.811
4 3,311.811
4 0.0136

0.4946
3,459.543
2 Worker

1.2722

0.6305

10.0515

0.0292

3.3845

0.0157

3.4001

0.8977

0.0144

0.9121
2,949.119
5 2,949.119
5 0.0709

0.0700
2,971.750
0 Total

1.4469

7.4175

12.1024

0.0605

4.4760

0.0620

4.5380

1.2121

0.0587

1.2708
6,260.930
9 6,260.930
9 0.0845

0.5646
6,431.293
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 17 of 29 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1710

6.7503

2.0147

0.0308

1.0916

0.0461

1.1377

0.3143

0.0441

0.3584
3,249.552
0 3,249.552
0 0.0131

0.4849
3,394.366
8 Worker

1.1835

0.5659

9.4195

0.0283

3.3845

0.0149

3.3994

0.8977

0.0138

0.9115
2,858.237
0 2,858.237
0 0.0642

0.0657
2,879.405
2 Total

1.3545

7.3162

11.4342

0.0590

4.4760

0.0610

4.5371

1.2121

0.0578

1.2699
6,107.789
0 6,107.789
0 0.0773

0.5505
6,273.772
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 18 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1710

6.7503

2.0147

0.0308

1.0916

0.0461

1.1377

0.3143

0.0441

0.3584
3,249.552
0 3,249.552
0 0.0131

0.4849
3,394.366
8 Worker

1.1835

0.5659

9.4195

0.0283

3.3845

0.0149

3.3994

0.8977

0.0138

0.9115
2,858.237
0 2,858.237
0 0.0642

0.0657
2,879.405
2 Total

1.3545

7.3162

11.4342

0.0590

4.4760

0.0610

4.5371

1.2121

0.0578

1.2699
6,107.789
0 6,107.789
0 0.0773

0.5505
6,273.772
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 19 of 29 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.3850
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.3850
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0431

0.0206

0.3429

1.0300e-
003

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332
104.0620
104.0620

2.3400e-
003

2.3900e-
003
104.8327
Total

0.0431

0.0206

0.3429

1.0300e-
003

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332
104.0620
104.0620

2.3400e-
003

2.3900e-
003
104.8327
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 20 of 29 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0431

0.0206

0.3429

1.0300e-
003

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332
104.0620
104.0620

2.3400e-
003

2.3900e-
003
104.8327
Total

0.0431

0.0206

0.3429

1.0300e-
003

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332
104.0620
104.0620

2.3400e-
003

2.3900e-
003
104.8327
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 21 of 29 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
681.4145

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total
681.5854

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.2356

0.1126

1.8748

5.6300e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
568.8724
568.8724

0.0128

0.0131
573.0855
Total

0.2356

0.1126

1.8748

5.6300e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
568.8724
568.8724

0.0128

0.0131
573.0855
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 22 of 29 ends

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total
681.5854

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.2356

0.1126

1.8748

5.6300e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
568.8724
568.8724

0.0128

0.0131
573.0855
Total

0.2356

0.1126

1.8748

5.6300e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
568.8724
568.8724

0.0128

0.0131
573.0855
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 23 of 29 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

9.6056

12.8586

77.1740

0.1861

18.3338

0.1559

18.4897

4.8951

0.1465

5.0416
18,979.98
52 18,979.98
52 0.9021

0.9919
19,298.13
32 Unmitigated

9.6056

12.8586

77.1740

0.1861

18.3338

0.1559

18.4897

4.8951

0.1465

5.0416
18,979.98
52 18,979.98
52 0.9021

0.9919
19,298.13
32 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

9.50 7.30

7.30 59.00

28.00 13.00
79 19
2 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Industrial Park

0.522587

0.052580

0.171418

0.151108

0.026705

0.007202

0.013509

0.026273

0.000644

0.000311

0.023009

0.001408

0.003247
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 24 of 29 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Industrial Park
34692.9

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Total

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 25 of 29 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Unmitigated

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285

34.6929

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Total

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 26 of 29 ends

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating

3.7338

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

20.9741

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

9.1900e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Total

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 27 of 29 ends

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

3.7338

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

20.9741

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

9.1900e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Total

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 28 of 29 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

Page 29 of 29 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 446
Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Land Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Energy Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Industrial Park
980.10
1000sqft

22.50 980,100.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.7 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2026
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 1 of 29 ends

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 2 of 29 ends

3.2779

32.4176

28.1768

0.0858

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,653.208
5 8,653.208
5 1.9480

0.5897
8,846.601
6 2025

2.6721

20.4827

26.8834

0.0844

4.4760

0.5897

5.0657

1.2121

0.5551

1.7672

0.0000
8,500.722
2 8,500.722
2 0.6937

0.5741
8,689.147
9 2026
681.7973

20.3665

26.3203

0.0830

4.4760

0.5887

5.0648

1.2121

0.5542

1.7663

0.0000
8,358.077
4 8,358.077
4 0.7163

0.5594
8,541.936
7 Maximum
681.7973

32.4176

28.1768

0.0858

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,653.208
5 8,653.208
5 1.9480

0.5897
8,846.601
6 Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

3.2779

32.4176

28.1768

0.0858

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,653.208
5 8,653.208
5 1.9480

0.5897
8,846.601
6 2025

2.6721

20.4827

26.8834

0.0844

4.4760

0.5897

5.0657

1.2121

0.5551

1.7672

0.0000
8,500.722
2 8,500.722
2 0.6937

0.5741
8,689.147
9 2026
681.7973

20.3665

26.3203

0.0830

4.4760

0.5887

5.0648

1.2121

0.5542

1.7663

0.0000
8,358.077
4 8,358.077
4 0.7163

0.5594
8,541.936
7 Maximum
681.7973

32.4176

28.1768

0.0858

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,653.208
5 8,653.208
5 1.9480

0.5897
8,846.601
6 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 3 of 29 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 449
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 4 of 29 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Energy

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mobile

7.5210

14.3447

75.4989

0.1715

18.3338

0.1561

18.4899

4.8951

0.1466

5.0417
17,503.90
68 17,503.90
68 1.0091

1.0500
17,842.03
64 Total

32.6122

17.7469

78.4558

0.1919

18.3338

0.4149

18.7487

4.8951

0.4055

5.3005
21,585.63
37 21,585.63
37 1.0879

1.1248
21,948.03
15 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Energy

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mobile

7.5210

14.3447

75.4989

0.1715

18.3338

0.1561

18.4899

4.8951

0.1466

5.0417
17,503.90
68 17,503.90
68 1.0091

1.0500
17,842.03
64 Total

32.6122

17.7469

78.4558

0.1919

18.3338

0.4149

18.7487

4.8951

0.4055

5.3005
21,585.63
37 21,585.63
37 1.0879

1.1248
21,948.03
15 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 5 of 29 ends

0.29 Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

Page 6 of 29 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 412.00
161.00

0.00 10.80

7.30 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 82.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 7 of 29 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.8922
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Total

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0448

0.0305

0.3405

9.8000e-
004

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332

98.9433

3.2100e-
003

3.0600e-
003

99.9359
Total

0.0448

0.0305

0.3405

9.8000e-
004

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332

98.9433

3.2100e-
003

3.0600e-
003

99.9359
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 8 of 29 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Total

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0448

0.0305

0.3405

9.8000e-
004

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332

98.9433

3.2100e-
003

3.0600e-
003

99.9359
Total

0.0448

0.0305

0.3405

9.8000e-
004

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332

98.9433

3.2100e-
003

3.0600e-
003

99.9359
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 9 of 29 ends

19.6570

0.0000

19.6570

10.1025

0.0000

10.1025

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

1.2294

1.1310

1.1310
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Total

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

19.6570

1.2294

20.8864

10.1025

1.1310

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0538

0.0366

0.4086

1.1700e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
118.7319
118.7319

3.8500e-
003

3.6700e-
003
119.9230
Total

0.0538

0.0366

0.4086

1.1700e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
118.7319
118.7319

3.8500e-
003

3.6700e-
003
119.9230
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 10 of 29 ends

19.6570

0.0000

19.6570

10.1025

0.0000

10.1025

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

1.2294

1.1310

0.0000
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Total

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

19.6570

1.2294

20.8864

10.1025

1.1310

11.2335

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0538

0.0366

0.4086

1.1700e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
118.7319
118.7319

3.8500e-
003

3.6700e-
003
119.9230
Total

0.0538

0.0366

0.4086

1.1700e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
118.7319
118.7319

3.8500e-
003

3.6700e-
003
119.9230
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 11 of 29 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

9.2036

0.0000

9.2036

3.6538

0.0000

3.6538

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

1.3354

1.2286

1.2286
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Total

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

9.2036

1.3354

10.5390

3.6538

1.2286

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0597

0.0407

0.4540

1.3100e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
131.9244
131.9244

4.2800e-
003

4.0800e-
003
133.2478
Total

0.0597

0.0407

0.4540

1.3100e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
131.9244
131.9244

4.2800e-
003

4.0800e-
003
133.2478
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 12 of 29 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

9.2036

0.0000

9.2036

3.6538

0.0000

3.6538

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

1.3354

1.2286

0.0000
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Total

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

9.2036

1.3354

10.5390

3.6538

1.2286

4.8823

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0597

0.0407

0.4540

1.3100e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
131.9244
131.9244

4.2800e-
003

4.0800e-
003
133.2478
Total

0.0597

0.0407

0.4540

1.3100e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
131.9244
131.9244

4.2800e-
003

4.0800e-
003
133.2478
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 13 of 29 ends

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.5769
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Total

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1678

7.2947

2.1673

0.0320

1.0916

0.0465

1.1380

0.3143

0.0445

0.3588
3,379.867
5 3,379.867
5 0.0137

0.5056
3,530.888
7 Worker

1.2304

0.8377

9.3514

0.0269

3.3845

0.0165

3.4010

0.8977

0.0152

0.9129
2,717.642
1 2,717.642
1 0.0882

0.0841
2,744.905
2 Total

1.3982

8.1324

11.5187

0.0589

4.4760

0.0630

4.5390

1.2120

0.0596

1.2717
6,097.509
6 6,097.509
6 0.1019

0.5897
6,275.793
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 14 of 29 ends

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Total

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1678

7.2947

2.1673

0.0320

1.0916

0.0465

1.1380

0.3143

0.0445

0.3588
3,379.867
5 3,379.867
5 0.0137

0.5056
3,530.888
7 Worker

1.2304

0.8377

9.3514

0.0269

3.3845

0.0165

3.4010

0.8977

0.0152

0.9129
2,717.642
1 2,717.642
1 0.0882

0.0841
2,744.905
2 Total

1.3982

8.1324

11.5187

0.0589

4.4760

0.0630

4.5390

1.2120

0.0596

1.2717
6,097.509
6 6,097.509
6 0.1019

0.5897
6,275.793
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 15 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1637

7.2695

2.1225

0.0314

1.0916

0.0465

1.1380

0.3143

0.0444

0.3588
3,318.348
5 3,318.348
5 0.0131

0.4960
3,466.483
7 Worker

1.1410

0.7436

8.6763

0.0260

3.3845

0.0157

3.4001

0.8977

0.0144

0.9121
2,625.899
3 2,625.899
3 0.0796

0.0781
2,651.166
2 Total

1.3047

8.0130

10.7988

0.0574

4.4760

0.0621

4.5381

1.2121

0.0588

1.2709
5,944.247
8 5,944.247
8 0.0927

0.5741
6,117.649
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 16 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1637

7.2695

2.1225

0.0314

1.0916

0.0465

1.1380

0.3143

0.0444

0.3588
3,318.348
5 3,318.348
5 0.0131

0.4960
3,466.483
7 Worker

1.1410

0.7436

8.6763

0.0260

3.3845

0.0157

3.4001

0.8977

0.0144

0.9121
2,625.899
3 2,625.899
3 0.0796

0.0781
2,651.166
2 Total

1.3047

8.0130

10.7988

0.0574

4.4760

0.0621

4.5381

1.2121

0.0588

1.2709
5,944.247
8 5,944.247
8 0.0927

0.5741
6,117.649
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 17 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1601

7.2297

2.0858

0.0308

1.0916

0.0462

1.1378

0.3143

0.0442

0.3585
3,255.984
1 3,255.984
1 0.0127

0.4862
3,401.189
6 Worker

1.0647

0.6671

8.1499

0.0252

3.3845

0.0149

3.3994

0.8977

0.0138

0.9115
2,545.619
0 2,545.619
0 0.0723

0.0732
2,569.249
0 Total

1.2247

7.8968

10.2356

0.0560

4.4760

0.0612

4.5372

1.2121

0.0580

1.2700
5,801.603
1 5,801.603
1 0.0850

0.5594
5,970.438
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 18 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1601

7.2297

2.0858

0.0308

1.0916

0.0462

1.1378

0.3143

0.0442

0.3585
3,255.984
1 3,255.984
1 0.0127

0.4862
3,401.189
6 Worker

1.0647

0.6671

8.1499

0.0252

3.3845

0.0149

3.3994

0.8977

0.0138

0.9115
2,545.619
0 2,545.619
0 0.0723

0.0732
2,569.249
0 Total

1.2247

7.8968

10.2356

0.0560

4.4760

0.0612

4.5372

1.2121

0.0580

1.2700
5,801.603
1 5,801.603
1 0.0850

0.5594
5,970.438
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 19 of 29 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.3850
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0388

0.0243

0.2967

9.2000e-
004

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332

92.6803

2.6300e-
003

2.6700e-
003

93.5406
Total

0.0388

0.0243

0.2967

9.2000e-
004

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332

92.6803

2.6300e-
003

2.6700e-
003

93.5406
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 20 of 29 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0388

0.0243

0.2967

9.2000e-
004

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332

92.6803

2.6300e-
003

2.6700e-
003

93.5406
Total

0.0388

0.0243

0.2967

9.2000e-
004

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332

92.6803

2.6300e-
003

2.6700e-
003

93.5406
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 21 of 29 ends

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total
681.5854

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.2119

0.1328

1.6221

5.0100e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
506.6523
506.6523

0.0144

0.0146
511.3554
Total

0.2119

0.1328

1.6221

5.0100e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
506.6523
506.6523

0.0144

0.0146
511.3554
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 22 of 29 ends

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total
681.5854

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.2119

0.1328

1.6221

5.0100e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
506.6523
506.6523

0.0144

0.0146
511.3554
Total

0.2119

0.1328

1.6221

5.0100e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
506.6523
506.6523

0.0144

0.0146
511.3554
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 23 of 29 ends

7.5210

14.3447

75.4989

0.1715

18.3338

0.1561

18.4899

4.8951

0.1466

5.0417
17,503.90
68 17,503.90
68 1.0091

1.0500
17,842.03
64 Unmitigated

7.5210

14.3447

75.4989

0.1715

18.3338

0.1561

18.4899

4.8951

0.1466

5.0417
17,503.90
68 17,503.90
68 1.0091

1.0500
17,842.03
64 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

9.50 7.30

7.30 59.00

28.00 13.00
79 19
2 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Industrial Park

0.522587

0.052580

0.171418

0.151108

0.026705

0.007202

0.013509

0.026273

0.000644

0.000311

0.023009

0.001408

0.003247
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 24 of 29 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Total

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 25 of 29 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Unmitigated

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285

34.6929

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Total

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 26 of 29 ends

3.7338

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

20.9741

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

9.1900e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Total

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 27 of 29 ends

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

3.7338

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

20.9741

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

9.1900e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Total

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 28 of 29 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

Page 29 of 29 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 475
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0698 Total DPM (lbs) 237.9287671 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0705 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.382465753 Total DPM (g) 107924.4888 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.38630137 Construction Duration (days) 239 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.001881214 Total DPM (lbs) 141 Total DPM (lbs) 91.40931507 Release Height (meters) 3 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.002028082 Total DPM (g) 41463.26532 Total Acreage 75 Release Height (meters) 3 Start Date 5/7/2024 Max Horizontal (meters) 779.12 Total Acreage 75 End Date 1/1/2025 Min Horizontal (meters) 389.56 Max Horizontal (meters) 779.12 Construction Days 239 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Min Horizontal (meters) 389.56 Setting Visalia Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0724 Population 143,966 Setting Visalia Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.396712329 Start Date 5/7/2024 Population 143,966 Construction Duration (days) 365 End Date 3/2/2026
Total DPM (lbs) 144.8 Total Construction Days 664
Total DPM (g) 65681.28 Total Years of Construction 1.82 Start Date 1/1/2025 Total Years of Operation 28.18
End Date 1/1/2026
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.00523
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.028657534
Construction Duration (days) 60
Total DPM (lbs) 1.719452055
Total DPM (g) 779.9434521
Start Date 1/1/2026
End Date 3/2/2026
Construction Days 60
2026
Construction Operation
2024 Total Emission Rate
2025
Attachment B
476
AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 05/08/24
14:10:53
TITLE: ShirtandRiggin, Construction
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.188E-02 g/s 0.149E-01 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.620E-08 g/(s-m2) 0.492E-07 lb/(hr-m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 779.12 meters 2556.17 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 389.56 meters 1278.08 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN
POPULATION: 143966
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POINT SOURCES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE 1-HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL
SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD
-----------------------------------------------------
1* 1.000 0.3787 15 400.0 WIN
* = worst case diagonal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment C
477
********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON: Winter
ALBEDO: 0.35
BOWEN RATIO: 1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT -------------------------------------------------------------

YR MO DY JDY HR
-- -- -- --- --
10 01 10 10 01
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50

HT REF TA HT
- - - - - - - - - - -

10.0 310.0 2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **********************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC
(m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3)
--------------------- ---------------------

1.00 0.2922 2525.00 0.3615E-01
478

25.00 0.2992 2550.00 0.3570E-01

50.00 0.3063 2575.00 0.3525E-01

75.00 0.3130 2600.00 0.3482E-01 100.00 0.3195 2625.00 0.3439E-01 125.00 0.3257 2650.00 0.3398E-01 150.00 0.3317 2675.00 0.3357E-01 175.00 0.3374 2700.00 0.3318E-01 200.00 0.3426 2725.00 0.3279E-01 225.00 0.3479 2750.00 0.3241E-01 250.00 0.3531 2775.00 0.3204E-01 275.00 0.3581 2800.00 0.3167E-01 300.00 0.3629 2825.00 0.3132E-01 325.00 0.3676 2850.00 0.3097E-01 350.00 0.3721 2875.00 0.3062E-01 375.00 0.3764 2900.00 0.3028E-01 400.00 0.3787 2925.00 0.2995E-01 425.00 0.3770 2950.00 0.2962E-01 450.00 0.3199 2975.00 0.2930E-01 475.00 0.2706 3000.00 0.2898E-01 500.00 0.2428 3025.00 0.2867E-01 525.00 0.2244 3050.00 0.2837E-01 550.00 0.2106 3075.00 0.2807E-01 575.00 0.1986 3100.00 0.2778E-01 600.00 0.1891 3125.00 0.2749E-01 625.00 0.1798 3150.00 0.2720E-01 650.00 0.1715 3175.00 0.2693E-01 675.00 0.1647 3200.00 0.2665E-01 700.00 0.1588 3225.00 0.2638E-01 725.00 0.1533 3250.00 0.2612E-01 750.00 0.1482 3275.00 0.2586E-01 775.00 0.1433 3300.00 0.2561E-01 800.00 0.1387 3325.00 0.2536E-01 825.00 0.1344 3350.00 0.2511E-01 850.00 0.1303 3375.00 0.2487E-01 875.00 0.1264 3400.00 0.2463E-01 900.00 0.1227 3425.00 0.2440E-01 925.00 0.1191 3450.00 0.2417E-01 950.00 0.1158 3475.00 0.2395E-01 975.00 0.1126 3500.00 0.2373E-01 1000.00 0.1096 3525.00 0.2351E-01 1025.00 0.1066 3550.00 0.2329E-01 1050.00 0.1038 3575.00 0.2307E-01 1075.00 0.1012 3600.00 0.2286E-01 1100.00 0.9862E-01 3625.00 0.2266E-01 1125.00 0.9618E-01 3650.00 0.2245E-01 1150.00 0.9382E-01 3675.00 0.2225E-01 1175.00 0.9156E-01 3700.00 0.2206E-01 1200.00 0.8941E-01 3725.00 0.2186E-01 1225.00 0.8730E-01 3750.00 0.2167E-01 1250.00 0.8529E-01 3775.00 0.2148E-01 479
1275.00 0.8337E-01 3800.00 0.2130E-01 1300.00 0.8154E-01 3825.00 0.2111E-01 1325.00 0.7976E-01 3850.00 0.2094E-01 1350.00 0.7803E-01 3875.00 0.2076E-01 1375.00 0.7636E-01 3900.00 0.2058E-01 1400.00 0.7476E-01 3925.00 0.2041E-01 1425.00 0.7322E-01 3950.00 0.2024E-01 1450.00 0.7173E-01 3975.00 0.2008E-01 1475.00 0.7028E-01 4000.00 0.1991E-01 1500.00 0.6888E-01 4025.00 0.1975E-01 1525.00 0.6753E-01 4050.00 0.1959E-01 1550.00 0.6624E-01 4075.00 0.1943E-01 1575.00 0.6499E-01 4100.00 0.1928E-01 1600.00 0.6379E-01 4125.00 0.1912E-01 1625.00 0.6260E-01 4150.00 0.1897E-01 1650.00 0.6144E-01 4175.00 0.1882E-01 1675.00 0.6031E-01 4200.00 0.1867E-01 1700.00 0.5923E-01 4225.00 0.1853E-01 1725.00 0.5819E-01 4250.00 0.1838E-01 1750.00 0.5718E-01 4275.00 0.1824E-01 1775.00 0.5620E-01 4300.00 0.1810E-01 1800.00 0.5525E-01 4325.00 0.1797E-01 1825.00 0.5432E-01 4350.00 0.1783E-01 1850.00 0.5341E-01 4375.00 0.1770E-01 1875.00 0.5253E-01 4400.00 0.1756E-01 1900.00 0.5168E-01 4425.00 0.1743E-01 1925.00 0.5086E-01 4450.00 0.1730E-01 1950.00 0.5006E-01 4475.00 0.1718E-01 1975.00 0.4927E-01 4500.00 0.1705E-01 2000.00 0.4850E-01 4525.00 0.1693E-01 2025.00 0.4776E-01 4550.00 0.1680E-01 2050.00 0.4704E-01 4575.00 0.1668E-01 2075.00 0.4633E-01 4600.00 0.1656E-01 2100.00 0.4564E-01 4625.00 0.1644E-01 2125.00 0.4496E-01 4650.00 0.1632E-01 2150.00 0.4430E-01 4675.00 0.1621E-01 2175.00 0.4366E-01 4700.00 0.1609E-01 2200.00 0.4303E-01 4725.00 0.1598E-01 2225.00 0.4243E-01 4750.00 0.1587E-01 2250.00 0.4184E-01 4775.00 0.1576E-01 2275.00 0.4126E-01 4800.00 0.1565E-01 2300.00 0.4070E-01 4825.00 0.1554E-01 2325.00 0.4015E-01 4850.00 0.1543E-01 2350.00 0.3962E-01 4875.00 0.1533E-01 2375.00 0.3910E-01 4900.00 0.1522E-01 2400.00 0.3859E-01 4925.00 0.1512E-01 2425.00 0.3808E-01 4950.00 0.1502E-01 2450.00 0.3758E-01 4975.00 0.1492E-01 2475.00 0.3709E-01 5000.00 0.1482E-01 2500.00 0.3662E-01
480
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in

SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA-454/R-92-019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL

CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- FLAT TERRAIN 0.3792 0.3792 0.3792 0.3792 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 403.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.2922 0.2922 0.2922 0.2922 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
481
AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 05/08/24 14:14:18
TITLE: ShirkandRigginAnnexation, Operational
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.203E-02 g/s 0.161E-01 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.668E-08 g/(s-m2) 0.530E-07 lb/(hr-m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 779.12 meters 2556.17 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 389.56 meters 1278.08 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN
POPULATION: 143966
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE 1-HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL
SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD
-----------------------------------------------------
1* 1.000 0.4083 15 400.0 WIN
* = worst case diagonal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 482
********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON: Winter
ALBEDO: 0.35
BOWEN RATIO: 1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT -------------------------------------------------------------

HT REF TA HT
- - - - - - - - - - -

10.0 310.0 2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **********************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC
(m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3)
--------------------- ---------------------

1.00 0.3150 2525.00 0.3897E-01
483

25.00 0.3226 2550.00 0.3848E-01

50.00 0.3302 2575.00 0.3800E-01

75.00 0.3375 2600.00 0.3754E-01 100.00 0.3445 2625.00 0.3708E-01 125.00 0.3512 2650.00 0.3663E-01 150.00 0.3576 2675.00 0.3620E-01 175.00 0.3638 2700.00 0.3577E-01 200.00 0.3693 2725.00 0.3535E-01 225.00 0.3751 2750.00 0.3494E-01 250.00 0.3807 2775.00 0.3454E-01 275.00 0.3861 2800.00 0.3415E-01 300.00 0.3913 2825.00 0.3376E-01 325.00 0.3963 2850.00 0.3339E-01 350.00 0.4011 2875.00 0.3301E-01 375.00 0.4058 2900.00 0.3265E-01 400.00 0.4083 2925.00 0.3229E-01 425.00 0.4064 2950.00 0.3193E-01 450.00 0.3449 2975.00 0.3159E-01 475.00 0.2917 3000.00 0.3125E-01 500.00 0.2617 3025.00 0.3091E-01 525.00 0.2420 3050.00 0.3059E-01 550.00 0.2270 3075.00 0.3026E-01 575.00 0.2141 3100.00 0.2995E-01 600.00 0.2038 3125.00 0.2963E-01 625.00 0.1939 3150.00 0.2933E-01 650.00 0.1849 3175.00 0.2903E-01 675.00 0.1776 3200.00 0.2873E-01 700.00 0.1712 3225.00 0.2844E-01 725.00 0.1653 3250.00 0.2816E-01 750.00 0.1597 3275.00 0.2788E-01 775.00 0.1545 3300.00 0.2761E-01 800.00 0.1495 3325.00 0.2734E-01 825.00 0.1449 3350.00 0.2707E-01 850.00 0.1405 3375.00 0.2681E-01 875.00 0.1363 3400.00 0.2656E-01 900.00 0.1323 3425.00 0.2631E-01 925.00 0.1284 3450.00 0.2606E-01 950.00 0.1248 3475.00 0.2582E-01 975.00 0.1214 3500.00 0.2558E-01 1000.00 0.1181 3525.00 0.2534E-01 1025.00 0.1150 3550.00 0.2511E-01 1050.00 0.1119 3575.00 0.2488E-01 1075.00 0.1091 3600.00 0.2465E-01 1100.00 0.1063 3625.00 0.2443E-01 1125.00 0.1037 3650.00 0.2421E-01 1150.00 0.1011 3675.00 0.2399E-01 1175.00 0.9871E-01 3700.00 0.2378E-01 1200.00 0.9639E-01 3725.00 0.2357E-01 1225.00 0.9412E-01 3750.00 0.2336E-01 1250.00 0.9195E-01 3775.00 0.2316E-01 484
1275.00 0.8988E-01 3800.00 0.2296E-01 1300.00 0.8791E-01 3825.00 0.2276E-01 1325.00 0.8599E-01 3850.00 0.2257E-01 1350.00 0.8413E-01 3875.00 0.2238E-01 1375.00 0.8233E-01 3900.00 0.2219E-01 1400.00 0.8060E-01 3925.00 0.2201E-01 1425.00 0.7894E-01 3950.00 0.2182E-01 1450.00 0.7734E-01 3975.00 0.2165E-01 1475.00 0.7576E-01 4000.00 0.2147E-01 1500.00 0.7425E-01 4025.00 0.2129E-01 1525.00 0.7280E-01 4050.00 0.2112E-01 1550.00 0.7141E-01 4075.00 0.2095E-01 1575.00 0.7006E-01 4100.00 0.2078E-01 1600.00 0.6877E-01 4125.00 0.2062E-01 1625.00 0.6749E-01 4150.00 0.2045E-01 1650.00 0.6623E-01 4175.00 0.2029E-01 1675.00 0.6502E-01 4200.00 0.2013E-01 1700.00 0.6386E-01 4225.00 0.1997E-01 1725.00 0.6273E-01 4250.00 0.1982E-01 1750.00 0.6164E-01 4275.00 0.1967E-01 1775.00 0.6059E-01 4300.00 0.1952E-01 1800.00 0.5957E-01 4325.00 0.1937E-01 1825.00 0.5856E-01 4350.00 0.1922E-01 1850.00 0.5759E-01 4375.00 0.1908E-01 1875.00 0.5664E-01 4400.00 0.1894E-01 1900.00 0.5572E-01 4425.00 0.1879E-01 1925.00 0.5483E-01 4450.00 0.1866E-01 1950.00 0.5396E-01 4475.00 0.1852E-01 1975.00 0.5312E-01 4500.00 0.1838E-01 2000.00 0.5229E-01 4525.00 0.1825E-01 2025.00 0.5149E-01 4550.00 0.1811E-01 2050.00 0.5071E-01 4575.00 0.1798E-01 2075.00 0.4995E-01 4600.00 0.1785E-01 2100.00 0.4920E-01 4625.00 0.1772E-01 2125.00 0.4847E-01 4650.00 0.1760E-01 2150.00 0.4776E-01 4675.00 0.1747E-01 2175.00 0.4707E-01 4700.00 0.1735E-01 2200.00 0.4639E-01 4725.00 0.1723E-01 2225.00 0.4574E-01 4750.00 0.1711E-01 2250.00 0.4510E-01 4775.00 0.1699E-01 2275.00 0.4448E-01 4800.00 0.1687E-01 2300.00 0.4388E-01 4825.00 0.1675E-01 2325.00 0.4329E-01 4850.00 0.1664E-01 2350.00 0.4271E-01 4875.00 0.1653E-01 2375.00 0.4215E-01 4900.00 0.1641E-01 2400.00 0.4160E-01 4925.00 0.1630E-01 2425.00 0.4105E-01 4950.00 0.1619E-01 2450.00 0.4051E-01 4975.00 0.1609E-01 2475.00 0.3999E-01 5000.00 0.1598E-01 2500.00 0.3947E-01
485
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL

CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- FLAT TERRAIN 0.4089 0.4089 0.4089 0.4089 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 403.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.3150 0.3150 0.3150 0.3150 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
486
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C
.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Char
acterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment D
487
2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for l arge solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern C alifornia drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of r eleases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations t hroughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by t he former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of M TBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of p erchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water tr eatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against p rovisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in C alifornia and New York.
488
3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that m et strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and r egulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring net works, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at milit ary bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development thr ough work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Te chnical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of d rinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation u nder the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 489
4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 490
5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to d etermine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of M edford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental ge ology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
491
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

492
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M. F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 493
8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.
494

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment E
495

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022

Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist

Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48

Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342

Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

496

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

497

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
498

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

499

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

500

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

501

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12 October 2022

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993

Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022

In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022

In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022

In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022

In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022

In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022

In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022

In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022

In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022

502

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022

In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022

In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022

In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022

In the Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022

In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022

In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021

503

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021

In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021

In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021

In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020

In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
504

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019

In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018

In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017

In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017

In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020

In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018

In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017

505

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022

In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015

In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015

In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015

In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015

In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014

In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012

In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011

In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010

In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
506

P: (626) 314-3821
F: (626) 389-5414
E: [email protected]

Mitchell M. Tsai
Law Firm
139 South Hudson Avenue
Suite 200
Pasadena, California 91101

VIA E-MAIL
May 15, 2024
Brandon Smith, Project Manager
City of Visalia
315 E. Acequia Avenue
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 713-4636
Em: [email protected]
RE: City of Visalia’s Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project (Annexation No. 2023-01)
Dear Brandon Smith,
On behalf of the Carpenters Union Local 1109 (“Local 1109”), our firm is submitting these comments for the City of Visalia’s (“City”) Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) for the Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project (Annexation No. 2023-01) (“Project”).

The Project’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration contains the following Project Description:

The Project proposes to annex an approximately 75 -acre site located within unincorporated Tulare County into the City of Visalia (City) city limits (Project). The Project is within the City’s Urban Growth Boundary, and the General Plan designates the site as Industrial (I) and Light Industrial (IL).

Surrounding land uses include industrial development to the south and west, agricultural operations to the north, and residential development to the east. The approximately 32-acre portion of the site designated as Light Industrial is located on the easter ly side of the site and is closest to the existing residences. The approximately 43 -acre portion designated as Industrial is located on the westerly side of the site. A 0.5-acre portion of the Project site located in the southeast corner will be used by So uthern 507
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 2 of 23 ends

California Edison (SCE) for a substation and is not a part of this Project.

Therefore, approximately 31.5 acres will be available for light industrial development (Figure 2-3).

The applicant has not proposed any specific use on the property at this time. For analysis purposes, it is assumed that the proposed uses would include primarily industrial -type warehousing and combined office/warehouse type buildings. An assumed floor area ratio (FAR) of

0.3 for the approximately 75 -acre site indicates an allowable square footage of 980,100 square feet of buildable area. Therefore, four approximately 245,025 square -foot warehouse and/or combined office/warehouse type buildings would be allowable on site. Any proposed development would involve necessary infrastructure and improvements to serve the potential uses consistent with City standards and requirements. Upon annexation, the Project site would be connected to the City wastewater system and to the water system operated by California Water Service Company. Future development on the property will also be required to provide an irrevocable offer of dedication on the west side of North Shirk Street that will ultimately facilitate two southbound through lanes and street frontage improvements.

The following discretionary actions are required for the proposed development:
• Annexation into the City of Visalia
• Annexation Approval by Tulare County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo)
NOI of MND, pp. 1-2.

The concurrently circulated MND contains the same project description. MND, pp. 1-2.

Local 1109 represents thousands of union carpenters in Tulare County, and has a strong interest in well-ordered land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects.
508
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 3 of 23 ends

Individual members of Local 1109 live, work, and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project’s environmental impacts.

Local 1109 expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing and proceeding related to this Project.

Gov. Code, § 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code, § 21177, subd. (a); see Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1199-1203; see also Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1121.

Local 1109 incorporates by reference all comments related to the Project or its CEQA review, including the Environmental Impact Report. See Citizens for Clean Energy v City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the project’s environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties).

Moreover, Local 1109 requests that the City provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.), and the California Planning and Zoning Law (“Planning and Zoning Law”) (Gov. Code, §§ 65000–65010).

California Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2, and 21167(f) and California Government Code Section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency’s governing body.

I. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL
WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY’S ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT
The City should require the Project to be built by contractors who participate in a Joint Labor-Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California and make a commitment to hiring a local workforce.

Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note:
509
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 4 of 23 ends

[A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling.

Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded:
[L]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost —and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California’s workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well-trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.
1 Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that they improve an area’s jobs-housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job commutes and the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In fact, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the “[u]se of a local state-certified apprenticeship program” can result in air pollutant reductions. 2 Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits.

As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:

People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced

1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/
wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf. 2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021/2021-May7-027.pdf?sfvrsn=10. 510
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 5 of 23 ends

communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.3
Moreover, local hire mandates and skill-training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must match those held by local residents.
4 Some municipalities have even tied local hire and
other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. Cervero and Duncan note that:

In nearly built -out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city’s First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate-level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment -ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits.

Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 (“AB2011”). AB2011 amended the Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by-right approval for projects being built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements.

3 California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance at p. 6, available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobs- housing.pdf
4 Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs- Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available at http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT- 825.pdf.
511
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 6 of 23 ends

The City should consider utilizing local workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts.

II. THE PROJECT WOULD BE APPROVED IN VIOLATION OF THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
A. Background Concerning the California Environmental Quality Act The California Environmental Quality Act is a California statute designed to inform decision-makers and the public about the potential significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”), § 15002, subd. (a)(1).
5 At its core, its purpose is to “inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made.” Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564.

1. Background Concerning Environmental Impact Reports
CEQA directs public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental damage, when possible, by requiring alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subds. (a)(2)-(3); see also Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Committee v. Board of Port Comes (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1354; Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn., 47 Cal.3d at p. 400. The EIR serves to provide public agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project is likely to have on the environment and to “identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subd. (a)(2). If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are “acceptable due to overriding concerns” specified in Public Resources Code section 21081. See CEQA Guidelines, § 15092, subds. (b)(2)(A)-(B).

5 The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq., are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. Cal. Pub. Res. Code, § 21083. The CEQA Guidelines are given “great weight in interpreting CEQA except when . . . clearly unauthorized or erroneous.” Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 217. 512
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 7 of 23 ends

While the courts review an EIR using an ‘abuse of discretion’ standard, the reviewing court is not to uncritically rely on every study or analysis presented by a project proponent in support of its position. Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 1355 (quoting Laurel Heights Improvement Assn., 47 Cal.3d at pp. 391, 409 fn. 12) (internal quotations omitted). A clearly inadequate or unsupported study is entitled to no judicial deference. Id. Drawing this line and determining whether the EIR complies with CEQA’s information disclosure requirements presents a question of law subject to independent review by the courts. Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 515; Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of Madera (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 48, 102, 131. As the court stated in Berkeley Jets, prejudicial abuse of discretion occurs if the failure to include relevant information precludes informed decision-making and informed public participation, thereby thwarting the statutory goals of the EIR process. 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 1355 (internal quotations omitted).

The preparation and circulation of an EIR is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. Communities for a Better Environment v. Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70, 80 (quoting Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 449-450). The EIR’s function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been considered. Id. For the EIR to serve these goals it must present information so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed, and the public must be given an adequate opportunity to comment on that presentation before the decision to go forward is made. Id.

A strong presumption in favor of requiring preparation of an EIR is built into CEQA.

This presumption is reflected in what is known as the “fair argument” standard under which an EIR must be prepared whenever substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602; Friends of “B” St. v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.3d 988, 1002.

The fair argument test stems from the statutory mandate that an EIR be prepared for any project that “may have a significant effect on the environment.” PRC, § 21151; see No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.App.3d 68, 75; accord Jensen v. City of Santa Rosa (2018) 23 Cal.App.5th 877, 884. Under this test, if a proposed project is not 513
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 8 of 23 ends

exempt and may cause a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare an EIR. PRC, §§ 21100 (a), 21151; CEQA Guidelines, § 15064 (a)(1), (f)(1).

An EIR may be dispensed with only if the lead agency finds no substantial evidence in the initial study or elsewhere in the record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 768, 785. In such a situation, the agency must adopt a negative declaration. PRC, § 21080, subd. (c)(1); CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15063 (b)(2), 15064(f)(3).
“Significant effect upon the environment” is defined as “a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment.” PRC, § 21068; CEQA Guidelines, § 15382. A project may have a significant effect on the environment if there is a reasonable probability that it will result in a significant impact. No Oil, Inc., 13 Cal.3d at p. 83 fn. 16; see Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 309. If any aspect of the project may result in a significant impact on the environment, an EIR must be prepared even if the overall effect of the project is beneficial. CEQA Guidelines, § 15063(b)(1); see County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1580.

This standard sets a “low threshold” for preparation of an EIR. Consolidated Irrigation Dist. v. City of Selma (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 187, 207; Nelson v. County of Kern (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 252; Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 928; Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 572, 580; Citizen Action to Serve All Students v. Thornley (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 748, 754; Sundstrom, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 310. If substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may have a significant environmental effect, the lead agency must prepare an EIR even if other substantial evidence before it indicates the project will have no significant effect. See Jensen, 23 Cal.App.5th at p. 886; Clews Land & Livestock v. City of San Diego (2017) 19 Cal.App.5th 161, 183; Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. v. County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 150; Brentwood Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491; Friends of “B” St., 106 Cal.App.3d 988; CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(f)(1).

2. Background Concerning Initial Studies, Negative Declarations, and Mitigated Negative Declarations.

CEQA and CEQA Guidelines are strict and unambiguous about when an MND may be used. A lead agency may adopt an MND only if “there is no substantial evidence 514
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 9 of 23 ends

that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15074(b).

Evidence supporting a fair argument of a significant environmental impact triggers preparation of an EIR regardless of whether the record contains contrary evidence.

League for Protection of Oakland’s Architectural and Historical Resources v. City of Oakland (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 896, 904-905. “Where the question is the sufficiency of the evidence to support a fair argument, deference to the agency’s determination is not appropriate[.]” County Sanitation, 127 Cal.App.4th at 1579 (quoting Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1307, 1317-1318).

Further, it is the duty of the lead agency, not the public, to conduct the proper environmental studies. “The agency should not be allowed to hide behind its own failure to gather relevant data.” Sundstrom, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 311. “Deficiencies in the record may actually enlarge the scope of fair argument by lending a logical plausibility to a wider range of inferences.” Id; see also Gentry v. City of Murrieta (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1359, 1382 (lack of study enlarges the scope of the fair argument which may be made based on the limited facts in the record).

Thus, refusal to complete recommended studies lowers the already low threshold to establish a fair argument. The court may not exercise its independent judgment on the omitted material by determining whether the ultimate decision of the lead agency would have been affected had the law been followed. Environmental Protection Information Center v. Cal. Dept. of Forestry (2008) 44 Cal.4th 459, 486 (internal citations and quotations omitted). The remedy for this deficiency would be for the trial court to issue a writ of mandate. Id.

Both the review for failure to follow CEQA’s procedures and the fair argument test are questions of law, thus, the de novo standard of review applies. Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 435. “Whether the agency’s record contains substantial evidence that would support a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment is treated as a question of law. Consolidated Irrigation Dist., 204 Cal.App.4th at p. 207; Kostka and Zischke, Practice Under the Environmental Quality Act (2017, 2d ed.) at § 6.76.

In the MND context, courts give no deference to the agency. The agency or the court should not weigh expert testimony or decide on the credibility of such evidence⁠—this is the EIR’s responsibility. As stated in Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento:
515
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 10 of 23 ends

Unlike the situation where an EIR has been prepared, neither the lead agency nor a court may “weigh” conflicting substantial evidence to determine whether an EIR must be prepared in the first instance.

Guidelines section 15064, subdivision (f)(1) provides in pertinent part: if a lead agency is presented with a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall prepare an EIR even though it may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the projec t will not have a significant effect. Thus, as Claremont itself recognized, [c]onsideration is not to be given contrary evidence supporting the preparation of a negative declaration.
(2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 935 (internal citations and quotations omitted).

In cases where it is not clear whether there is substantial evidence of significant environmental impacts, CEQA requires erring on the side of a “preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review.” Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322, 332. “The foremost principle under CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to be interpreted in such manner as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language. Friends of Mammoth v. Bd. of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259.

If a project has a significant effect on the environment, an agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are “acceptable due to overriding concerns.” CEQA Guidelines § 15092(b)(2)(A–B).

CEQA mitigation measures proposed and adopted are required to describe what actions will be taken to reduce or avoid an environmental impact. (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B) [providing “[f]ormulation of mitigation measures should not be deferred until some future time.”].) While the same Guidelines section 15126.5(a)(1)(B) acknowledges an exception to the rule against deferrals, such exception is narrowly proscribed to situations where it is impractical or infeasible to include those details during the project's environmental review.

Here, the MND’s mitigation measures fail to adequately analyze and/or mitigate the Project’s impacts and are improperly deferred, such that an EIR is required. 516
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 11 of 23 ends

B. The MND’s Project Description Is Fatally Flawed and in Violation of CEQA’s Piecemealing Prohibition, Which, In Turn, Has Tainted the MND’s Remaining Analysis.

First, CEQA Guidelines § 15071 specifically requires that an MND include “a brief description of the project.” In turn, it is axiomatic that such project description in a MND must be accurate, stable, and finite. As stated in Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority v. Hensler (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 577, 592:
“‘An accurate project description is necessary for an intelligent evaluation of the potential environmental effects of a proposed activity.’ (Cit. omit.) A narrow view of a project could result in the fallacy of division, that is, overlooking its cumulative impact by separately focusing on isolated parts of the whole. ( Cit. omit .) … ‘CEQA compels an interactive process of assessment of environmental impacts and responsive project modification which must be genuine. It must be open to the public, premised upon a full and meaningful disclosure of the scope, purposes, and effect of a consistently described project, with flexibility to respond to unforeseen insights that emerge from the process.’ (Cit. omit.)”
Similarly, “the selection of a narrow project as the launching pad for a vastly wider proposal frustrate[s] CEQA’s public information aims . . . . calculated selection of its truncated project concept [is] not an abstract violation of CEQA.” County of Inyo v.

City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 199–200; Pub. Res. Code § 21168.5.

An agency engages in prejudicial abuse of discretion where it fails to provide a stable and consistent project description as part of environmental review. San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of Merced (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 645, 657. A conflicting project description results in understated impact analysis. Id. at 672.

As stated in County of Inyo v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 192–193:

A curtailed or distorted project description may stultify the objectives of the reporting process . Only through an accurate view of the project may affected outsiders and public decision -makers balance the proposal’s benefit against its environmental cost, consider mitigation measures, assess the advantage of terminating the proposal (i.e., the “no project” alternative) and weigh other alternatives in the balance.
517
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 12 of 23 ends

Lastly, “[w]here the agency uses an erroneous or entirely speculative project description as justification for its approval of the Project, but never intended to actually proceed with that project, “such a situation would constitute much more insidious conduct than a failure to comply with CEQA. ‘CEQA contemplates serious and not superficial or pro forma consideration of the potential environmental consequences of a project.’ (Cit. omit.)” Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority v.

Hensler (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 577, 593.

Second, CEQA mandates that “the lead agency must consider the whole of an action, not simply its constituent parts, when determining whether it will have a significant environmental effect.” Guidelines § 15003(h). As a corollary, CEQA forbids “piecemealing.” Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue v. City of Santa Cruz (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1170, 1208. (“The prohibition against piecemeal review is the flip side of the requirement that the whole of a project be reviewed under CEQA. (See Guidelines, § 15378, subd. (a).)”) Piecemealing is reviewed de novo. (Paulek v.

Department of Water Resources (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 35, 46.) CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition stems from two sources—a public agency’s duty to define the “project” being evaluated by “the whole of an action” (CEQA Guidelines § 15378(a)&(c)), and its duty to “consider[ ] the effects, both individual and collective, of all activities involved in [the] project” (PRC § 21002.1(d)).

Moreover, CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition stems from its requirement to consider the cumulative impacts of all phased or multiple projects which are part of the same general undertaking. CEQA Guidelines § 15165. For purposes of cumulative impacts analysis, CEQA mandates to consider the impacts of the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. CEQA Guidelines §§ 15063(b)(1) (prepare an EIR “if the agency determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial”); 15064(h) (need to consider cumulative impacts of past, other current and “probable future” projects). Even if the Project’s impacts may not be significant, its incremental effects, when added to other past, present, and probable future projects, can be cumulatively significant. (CEQA Guidelines §§15065(a)(3), 15130(b)(1)(A), 15355(b).)
Our Supreme Court has defined piecemealing as “chopping a large project into many little ones – each with a minimal potential impact on the environment – which 518
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 13 of 23 ends

cumulatively may have disastrous consequences.” (Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Com. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263, 283-284.) Thus, identifying and studying the “whole of the project” is crucial to attainment of CEQA’s goals of properly disclosing and mitigating environmental impacts. “’Project’ is given a broad interpretation in order to maximize protection of the environment.” (San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v.

County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 730.)
“Even when a developer obtains a right to construct or has completed one or more pieces of a larger project that has so far evaded full environmental review, the City and this Court have the right, indeed the duty, to remedy the wrong. This includes stopping the challenged incomplete parts and ordering a comprehensive environmental review of the entire project using a corrected project description and baseline.” (Arviv Enterprises, Inc. v. South Valley Area Planning Com. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1333 (“Arviv”).) In Arviv, a Los Angeles developer had an overall plan to build 21 homes in the Mulholland community along Woodstock Road. (Id. at 1336.) Rather than present the “whole” of its action as part of an EIR or other comprehensive review, the developer chopped the larger project into pieces, one of 5 homes, another of 2 homes, and another of 14 homes. (Id. at 1338 & 1343.) It then processed separately each via CEQA exemptions or MND. (Id.) Eventually the City figured out the developer’s attempted circumvention of CEQA and required it “to obtain an EIR for a 21-house development,” rather than proceed in a piecemeal manner. The developer sued the City, arguing it should not have to prepare an EIR. (Id. at 1343.) The trial court rejected the developer’s position, and our Court of Appeal affirmed, holding: “The significance of an accurate project description is manifest, where, as here, cumulative environmental impacts may be disguised or minimized by filing numerous, serial applications.” (Id. at 1346 (emph. added).)
“One way to evaluate which acts are part of a project is to examine how closely related the acts are to the overall objective of the project.” (Tuolumne County Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Sonora (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 1214, 1226.) “Another way to phrase the question of whether a particular act is a step taken towards the achievement of the proponent’s objective is to ask ‘whether the act is part of a coordinated endeavor.’ [Citation.]” (POET, LLC v. State Air Resources Bd. (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 52, 75, fn. 15.)
519
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 14 of 23 ends

The failure to analyze the whole of the project, and thereby allow the true impacts, including cumulative impacts of the various parts added together, to escape review, is potentially “disastrous,” and should not be allowed. (Bozung, supra, 13 Cal.3d at 283- 284.) Consistent with Arviv, an EIR is also required on piecemealing grounds to properly analyze regulatory threshold exceedances caused by the Project Applicant’s “coordinated endeavor.” For example, under Guidelines § 15206(b)(2)(D), a proposed hotel with more than 500 rooms shall be deemed regionally/area wide significant. This determination may not be possible where a project is piecemealed.

Similarly, under PRC § 21155.1, there are numerous limitations and requirements the Project must meet, including a cap of maximum 200 units, which cannot be properly assessed where a project is piecemealed.

CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition – especially for later phases or last act project components – is also critical as it results in an improperly inflated and inaccurate baseline and/or fundamentally inaccurate “no project” alternatives, which, in turn, taints the entire CEQA review. (POET, LLC v. State Air Resources Bd (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 52, 83 [use of an inflated baseline had the effect of understating the increase of impacts, requiring reversal]; see also, CEQA Guidelines §§ 15126.6(e)(2) & 15125(a)(1) [both the “no project” alternative and the baseline consider the existing environmental conditions]). It is settled that, without an adequate baseline, the “analysis of impacts, mitigation measures and project alternatives becomes impossible.” (County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water Agency (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 931, 953.)
Alternatively, even if various parts of the project are sufficiently separate and do not constitute a whole of an action, CEQA requires that the environmental review of the project include impacts of the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. See, CEQA Guidelines §§15065(a)(3), 15130(b)(1)(A), 15355(b).) In fact, courts treat piecemealing and failure to study cumulative impacts of related approvals as alternative theories. (San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 733 (“San Joaquin”) [“even assuming the sewer expansion was severable from the development project, the FEIR still did not comply with CEQA” for failure to consider their cumulative impacts.]) Thus, in analyzing a Project’s cumulative impacts, it is important to analyze not just the impacts of the Project itself but also consider impacts from all other related projects as well. 520
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 15 of 23 ends

CEQA’s prohibition against piecemealing was recently reaffirmed by the Court in the CEQA exemption context as resulting in two violations – improperly focusing on only part of the project instead of the whole of an action and also providing an unduly narrow project description to qualify for an exemption:
“In the unpublished portions of this opinion, we conclude County committed two other CEQA violations. First, it improperly described the project as constituting only the proposed condemnation proceedings and a mere change in ownership of the landfill sites. Second, the unduly narrow project description caused County to erroneously conclude the commonsense exemption applied. The CEQA violations justified the trial court's issuance of a writ of mandate vacating County's approval of condemnation proceedings for each of the three landfills.” Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. County of Inyo (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 1018, 1025 (“LADWP”).

In the LADWP case, supra, the project involved condemnation of land for purposes of continued and increased land use of operation of landfill, where the County invoked two exemptions: Class 1 (existing facilities and minor changes) and common sense exemption. LADWP, 67 Cal.App.5th 1030-31. The Court used independent review to interpret the scope of the exemptions, including the words “facility” and “minor.” The Court reasoned:
“In accordance with Hillside, we independently review whether County proceeded in the manner required by law in making its
exemption determination and apply the substantial evidence test to the County's findings of fact. Stated from another perspective, an appellate court “must first determine as a matter of law the scope of the exemption and then determine if substantial evidence supports the agency's factual finding that the project fell within the exemption.” ( California Farm Bureau Federation v. California Wildlife Conservation Bd. (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 173, 185 [49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 169].) This appeal raises a legal question about the scope of the existing facilities exemption, which requires us to interpret the words used in Guidelines section 15301.”
(LADWP, at 1036.)
521
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 16 of 23 ends

In light of the above-noted legal authority, the MND’s project description here is not accurate, stable, and finite. It further engages in improper piecemealing in violation of CEQA. Indeed, the Project description is vague, ambiguous, and undefined. No specifics of the Project (beyond the annexation of County land) has been provided whatsoever, leaving the City to assume what and how the applicant ultimately intends to develop the Project site. In this context, any would-be environmental review of the Project is entirely speculative and should be given little to no weight or validity.

Critically, MND’s project description notes that the Project has no specific uses proposed at this time and an actual development has yet to be proposed:

The applicant has not proposed any specific use on the property at this time.

For analysis purposes, it is assumed that the proposed uses would include primarily industrial-type warehousing and combined office/warehouse type buildings. An assumed floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.3 for the approximately 75-acre site indicates an allowable square footage of 980,100 square feet of buildable area. Therefore, four approximately 245,025 square -foot warehouse and/or combined office/warehouse type buildings would be allowable on site. Any proposed development would involve necessary infrastructure and improvements to serve the potential uses consistent with City standards and requirements.
(MND, p. 1.)
The MND’s acknowledgement that no specific uses for the Project have been proposed and its reference of “any proposed development” without specifying what development will in fact occur, renders the MND fatally lacking, since it leaves the public and decisionmakers in the dark about what other improvements are needed for the Project and what impacts they may have.

Similarly, the above-quoted statements make the MND’s project description legally lacking, in light of CEQA’s requirement under CEQA Guidelines § 15378(a) & (c) [whole of an action], which requires to include the full list of approvals that are needed for the Project and to study the impacts of all changes and their impacts in one document regardless of how many discretionary actions are required.

C. The Project May Have Significant Noise Impacts.

As noted in Section B, supra, the DEIR’s noise impact analysis is legally lacking and flawed because of a legally inadequate project description and unlawful piecemealing. 522
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 17 of 23 ends

In addition, the very nature of the Project indicates that it may have a significant impact on noise. The Project proposes to develop up to four (4) light industrial buildings of approximately 980,100 total square feet, along with associated internal roadways, parking, landscaping, utilities, and other improvements for the Project Site, with sensitive receptors (a residential subdivision) located on the east edge of the Project Site. MND, pp. 1, 2-1-2, Figure 2-2, 3-2.

Despite finding that the Project would have a significant noise impact with regards to, for example, the “generation of a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies . . .”, the MND relies upon deficient mitigation measures to conclude that these significant impacts would be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. MND, p. 4.6-21. However, the mitigation measure relied upon in noise impact analysis 4.6-1 is flawed for several reasons, which are discussed below.

Mitigation Measures NSE-1 and NSE-2 state that:

The Project developer or contractor shall continuously comply with the following measures throughout construction activities:
a. Pursuant to Visalia Municipal Code Section 8.36.050(C), the operation of construction equipment including jackhammers, portable generators, pneumatic equipment, trenchers, or other such equipment shall not be operated on the project site between the weekday hours of 7:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., and between the weekend hours of 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. b. All noise-producing project equipment and vehicles using internal- combustion engines shall be equipped with manufacturers-recommended mufflers and be maintained in good working condition.
c. All mobile or fixed noise-producing equipment used on the project site that is regulated for noise output by a federal, State, or local agency shall comply with such regulations while in the course of project construction activity. d. Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustion-powered equipment, where feasible.
e. Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and maintenance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise-sensitive receptors. f. Project area and site access road speed limits shall be established and enforced during the construction period.
523
City of Visalia, Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
May 15, 2024

Page 18 of 23 ends

Visalia City CouncilMay 20, 2024

Visalia City Council
May 20, 2024