Attachment 5 Comment Letter from Blum, Collins & Ho — Visalia City Council, May 20, 2024

BLUM, COLLINS & HO LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

AON CENTER
707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
SUITE 4880
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
(213) 572-0400
May 14, 2024
Brandon Smith, Principal Planner VIA EMAIL TO:

City of Visalia [email protected]
315 E. Acequia Avenue
Visalia, California 93291
SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON SHIRK AND RIGGIN ANNEXATION PROJECT. (ANNEXATION N0. 2023-01) MND (SCH NO. 2024041004)
Dear Mr. Smith,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project. Please accept and consider these comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Also, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

1.0 Summary
The Project site is utilized for dairy and agricultural operations. The Project proposes the annexation of an approximately 75-acre site from the County of Tulare into the City of Visalia.

The MND maintains that no development or construction project is proposed on the project site but for purposes of analysis, the development of 980,100 square feet of warehousing is analyzed throughout the MND.

1.1 Project Piecemealing
The MND does not accurately or adequately describe the project, meaning “the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment” (CEQA § 15378). The project proposed by Annexation No. 2023-01 is a piecemealed portion of a larger overall project Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

2 to be developed within the larger YS Industries Logistics Center in the City of Visalia. Other piecemealed projects include SPR192131 (construction of two 300,000 square foot buildings for a total of 600,000 square feet of warehousing 2 at the southwest area of Riggin and Clancy), SPR211503 known as YS Industrial Park Phase 2 (construction of one 354,248 sf warehouse building at the southeast area of Riggin and Clancy), and SPR221304 known as YS Industrial Park Phase 3 located on the same project site as the proposed project, Annexation No. 2023-01 (construction of 1,553,080 square feet of warehousing across 6 buildings with an overall site floor area ratio of 0.477). Cumulatively, the three piecemealed applications construct a total of 2,507,328 sf of warehouse space in the areas immediately adjacent to the project site.

The MND is further misleading in its analysis in stating in the Project Description that, “The applicant has not proposed any specific use on the property at this time.” For purposes of analysis, the MND assumes a “floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.3 for the approximately 75-acre site indicates an allowable square footage of 980,100 square feet of buildable area. Therefore, four approximately 245,025 square-foot warehouse and/or combined office/warehouse type buildings would be allowable on site.” Not only has a specific use on the property been proposed and submitted to the lead agency, it is significantly larger than the use analyzed in the MND. The MND is erroneous and inadequate as an informational document.

A project EIR must be prepared that accurately represents the whole of the action without piecemealing the project into separate, smaller development projects to present unduly low environmental impacts. CEQA Section 15161 describes project EIRs as examining “the environmental impacts of a specific development project. This type of EIR should focus primarily on the changes in the environment that would result from the development project. The EIR shall examine all phases of the project including planning, construction, and operation.” The specific development project is the construction and operation of all YS Industries buildings.

Additionally, CEQA Section 15146 requires that the degree of specificity in an EIR “will correspond to the degree of specificity involved in the underlying activity which is described in

1 https://cd.visalia.city/CitizenAccess/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Engineering&TabName=Engineering &capID1=ENG19&capID2=00000&capID3=00779&agencyCode=VISALIA 2 https://thesungazette.com/article/business/2022/01/12/e-commerce-continues-to-drive-visalias- industrial-expansion/
3 https://cd.visalia.city/CitizenAccess/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Engineering&TabName=Engineering &capID1=ENG21&capID2=00000&capID3=00558&agencyCode=VISALIA 4 https://cd.visalia.city/CitizenAccess/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Engineering&TabName=Engineering &capID1=ENG22&capID2=00000&capID3=00585&agencyCode=VISALIA&IsToShowInspection= Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

3 the EIR. (a) An EIR on a construction project will necessarily be more detailed in the specific effects of the project than will be an EIR on the adoption of a local general plan or comprehensive zoning ordinance because the effects of the construction can be predicted with greater accuracy.” Because there are multiple proposed buildings as part of a single project, the project EIR must be more detailed in the specific effects of the project. A project EIR must be prepared which accurately represents the whole of the action without piecemealing the project into separate, smaller development projects, development areas, or development phases to present unduly low environmental impacts.

2.0 Project Description

As stated above, the MND’s Project Description is misleading and erroneous. The MND states that, “The applicant has not proposed any specific use on the property at this time.” However, SPR221305 known as YS Industrial Park Phase 3 located on the same project site as the proposed project, Annexation No. 2023-01 has been submitted to the lead agency. SPR22130 proposes the construction and operation of 1,553,080 square feet of warehousing across 6 buildings with an overall site floor area ratio of 0.477, while the MND analyzes a potential scenario of a “floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.3 for the approximately 75-acre site indicates an allowable square footage of 980,100 square feet of buildable area. Therefore, four approximately 245,025 square-foot warehouse and/or combined office/warehouse type buildings would be allowable on site.” Not only has a specific use on the property been proposed and submitted to the lead agency, it is significantly larger than the use analyzed in the MND. The MND is erroneous and inadequate as an informational document. As stated above, a Project EIR must be prepared to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

The MND does not include a floor plan, detailed site plan, building elevations, or a conceptual grading plan. The basic components of a Planning Application include a detailed site plan, floor plan, conceptual grading plan, written narrative, and detailed elevations. The MND does not provide any site plan for public review or breakdown of proposed project land uses. An EIR must be prepared to include wholly accurate and adequate detailed project site plan, floor plan, grading plan, elevations, and project narrative for public review.

5 https://cd.visalia.city/CitizenAccess/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Engineering&TabName=Engineering &capID1=ENG22&capID2=00000&capID3=00585&agencyCode=VISALIA&IsToShowInspection= Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

4 3.4.3 - Air Quality, 3.4.6 - Energy, and 3.4.8 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Please refer to attachments from SWAPE for a complete technical commentary and analysis.

The MND does not include for analysis relevant environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts, including cumulative impacts from the proposed project. This is especially significant as the surrounding community is highly burdened by pollution. According to CalEnviroScreen 4.06, CalEPA’s screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, the proposed project’s census tract (6107001003) is ranked in the 99th percentile for overall pollution burden, meaning it is among the most polluted census tracks in the state. The surrounding community bears the impact of multiple sources of pollution and is more polluted than average on several pollution indicators measured by CalEnviroScreen. For example, the project census tract ranks in the 91st percentile for ozone burden, the 98th percentile for particulate matter (PM) 2.5 burden, and the 55th percentile for diesel PM. All of these environmental factors are attributed to heavy truck activity in the area.

Ozone can cause lung irritation, inflammation, and worsening of existing chronic health conditions, even at low levels of exposure7. The very small particles of diesel PM can reach deep into the lung, where they can contribute to a range of health problems. These include irritation to the eyes, throat and nose, heart and lung disease, and lung cancer8.

The census tract also ranks in the 78th percentile for contaminated drinking water. Poor communities and people in rural areas are exposed to contaminants in their drinking water more often than people in other parts of the state9. The census tract also ranks in the 85th percentile for groundwater threats. People who live near contaminated groundwater may be exposed to chemicals moving from the soil into the air inside their homes10.

The census tract bears more impacts from cleanup sites than 95% of the state. Chemicals in the buildings, soil, or water at cleanup sites can move into nearby communities through the air or movement of water11. The census tract also ranks in the 99th percentile for toxic releases. People living near facilities that emit toxic releases may breathe contaminated air regularly or if contaminants are released during an accident12.

6 CalEnviroScreen 4.0 https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40 7 OEHHA Ozone Burden https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/air-quality-ozone 8 OEHHA Diesel Particulate Matter https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/diesel-particulate- matter
9 OEHHA Drinking Water https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/drinking-water 10 OEHHA Groundwater Threats https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/groundwater-threats 11 OEHHA Cleanup Sites https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/cleanup-sites 12 OEHHA Toxic Releases https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/toxic-releases-facilities Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

5 The census tract also ranks in the 72nd percentile for solid waste facility impacts and 87th percentile for hazardous waste facility impacts. Solid waste facilities can expose people to hazardous chemicals, release toxic gases into the air (even after these facilites are closed), and chemicals can leach into soil around the facility and pose a health risk to nearby populations13.

Hazardous waste generators and facilities contribute to the contamination of air, water and soil near waste generators and facilities can harm the environment as well as people14.

Further, the census tract is a diverse community including 50% Hispanic and 8% Asian-American residents, whom are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pollution. The community has a high rate of poverty, meaning 39% of the households in the census tract have a total income before taxes that is less than the poverty level. Income can affect health when people cannot afford healthy living and working conditions, nutritious food and necessary medical care 15. Poor communities are often located in areas with high levels of pollution16. Poverty can cause stress that weakens the immune system and causes people to become ill from pollution17. Living in poverty is also an indication that residents may lack health insurance or access to medical care.

Medical care is vital for this census tract as it ranks in the 70th percentile for incidence of cardiovascular disease and 52nd percentile for incidence of asthma. The community also has a high rate of linguistic isolation, meaning 40% of the census tract speaks little to no English and faces further inequities as a result.

Additionally, the proposed project’s census tract (6107001003) and the census tracts adjacent to the project site (6107000900 (north/west) and 6107001004 (east)) are identified as SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities 18 . This indicates that cumulative impacts of development and environmental impacts in the area are disproportionately impacting these communities. The negative environmental, health, and quality of life impacts resulting from an over-saturation of the warehousing and logistics industry in the area have become distinctly inequitable. The severity of significant and unavoidable impacts particularly on these Disadvantaged Communities must be included for analysis as part of an EIR. Each section of the EIR must include the specific analysis

13 OEHHA Solid Waste Facilities https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/solid-waste-sites-and- facilities
14 OEHHA Hazardous Waste Generators and Facilities
https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/hazardous-waste-generators-and-facilities 15 OEHHA Poverty https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/poverty 16 Ibid.
17 Ibid.
18 OEHHA SB 535 Census Tracts https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/sb535 Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

6 of each environmental impact on the Disadvantaged Communities, including cumulative analysis and irreversible environmental effects.

The State of California lists three approved compliance modeling softwares19 for non-residential buildings: CBECC-Com, EnergyPro, and IES VE. CalEEMod is not listed as an approved software. The CalEEMod modeling does not comply with the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and under-reports the project s significant Energy impacts and fuel consumption to the public and decision makers. Since the MND did not accurately or adequately model the energy impacts in compliance with Title 24, it cannot conclude the project will generate less than significant impacts and a finding of significance must be made. An EIR with modeling using one of the approved software types must be prepared and circulated for public review in order to adequately analyze the project s significant environmental impacts. This is vital as the MND utilizes CalEEMod as a source in its methodology and analysis, which is clearly not an approved software.

3.4.11 - Land Use and Planning

The MND does not discuss or analyze the project’s compliance with the General Plan’s Land Use Buildout Scenario. Table 1-4: Non-Residential Floor Area within the General Plan20 projected new development of 9,690,000 s.f. of industrial uses between 2010 and 2030. Table 1-5:

Employment by Sector projects the associated creation of 9,670 jobs in the industrial sector. The MND does not provide any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the General Plan.

The MND has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. The whole of the action proposed by the project (inclusive of SPR22130) proposes the development of 1,553,080 square feet of industrial uses, which is 16% of the City’s industrial buildout accounted for by a single project. Piecemealed YS Industries projects combined with the proposed project cumulatively generate 2,507,328 square feet of industrial uses, which is 25% of the City’s industrial buildout. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed the General Plan buildout scenarios. For example, other recent industrial projects such as Shirk and Riggin Industrial Park Project by Seefried (3,820,000 sf) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 6,327,328 square feet of light industrial space. This represents 64% of the City’s industrial buildout through 2030 accounted for by only five recent projects.

19 California Energy Commission 2022 Energy Code Compliance Software https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2022- building-energy-efficiency-1
20 https://www.visalia.city/depts/community_development/planning/gp.asp Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

7 These totals increase when other industrial development approved, submitted, or “in the pipeline” since General Plan adoption are added to the total. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic.

Further, the MND does not provide a consistency analysis with all land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The project has significant potential to conflict with many of these items, including but not limited to the following from the General Plan:

1. T-P-9 Maintain acceptable levels of service for all modes and facilities, as established in Tables 4-1, Intersection Level of Service Definitions and 4-2, Level of Service Criteria for Roadway Segments.

2. T-P-15 Require additional right-of-way and improvements of Circulation Element facilities where needed for turning movements or to provide access to adjacent properties wherever access is not feasible from the lower classification street system.

3. T-P-24 Require that proposed developments make necessary off-site improvements if the location and traffic generation of a proposed development will result in congestion on major streets or failure to meet LOS D during peak periods or if it creates safety hazards.

4. T-P-61 Encourage high-security off-street parking areas for tractor-trailer rigs in industrial areas.

5. AQ-O-3 Reduce emissions of greenhouse gases that contribute to global climate change in accord with federal and State law.

Further, the MND does not discuss that the site is identified in the City’s Draft Housing Element21.

Table 41: Vacant Parcels Available for Emergency Shelters list the project site as a vacant site available to accommodate an emergency shelter and contributes to statutorily required capacity to accommodate the City’s homeless individuals. An EIR must be prepared to include this information for analysis and the City’s Housing Element must be revised to remove the project site from the sites inventory for statutorily required capacity to accommodate the City’s homeless individuals.

3.4.14 - Population and Housing

The MND utilizes uncertain language and does not provide any meaningful analysis or supporting evidence to substantiate the conclusion that there will be no significant impacts to population and housing. For example, the MND states that, “the Project would not likely induce substantial

21 https://hcdpowerbi.blob.core.windows.net/housing-elements/visalia-6th-adopted-122823.pdf Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

8 unplanned population growth,” and does not provide any quantification of the employees needed to construct or operate the project.

The MND has not provided a calculation of the project’s operational employees. The City’s General Plan22 provides employment generation rates, including the rate of 1 employee for every 750 square feet of light industrial building area.

Applying this ratio results in the following calculation:

Proposed Project: 1,553,080 sf / 750 sf = 2,071 employees YS Industries Cumulative Projects: 2,507,328 sf / 750 = 3,344 employees The MND utilizes uncertain and misleading language which does not provide any meaningful analysis of the project s population and employment generation. In order to comply with CEQA s requirements for meaningful disclosure, an EIR must be prepared to provide an accurate estimate of employees generated by all uses of the proposed project. It must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions. A construction worker employment analysis must also be included to adequately and accurately analyze all potentially significant environmental impacts. It must also provide a job buildout analysis of the City’s General Plan. Table 1-5: Employment by Sector within the General Plan indicates that the Industrial land use designation will allow for the creation of 9,670 new jobs from 2010-2030. The whole of the action proposed by the project (inclusive of SPR22130) will create 2,071 new jobs, which is 21% of the City’s industrial job buildout accounted for by a single project. Piecemealed YS Industries projects combined with the proposed project cumulatively generate 3,344 industrial employees, which is 34% of the City’s industrial job buildout. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed the General Plan buildout scenarios. For example, other recent industrial projects such as Shirk and Riggin Industrial Park Project by Seefried (3,820,000 sf; 5,094 jobs utilizing General Plan employment generation ratio) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 8,438 industrial jobs. This represents 87% of the City’s industrial job buildout through 2030 accounted for by only five recent projects. These totals increase when other industrial development approved, submitted, or “in the pipeline” since General Plan adoption are added to the total. The MND also has not provided evidence that the local unemployed population is qualified for or interested in work in the industrial sector. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on these topics.

22 https://www.visalia.city/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=30474 Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

9 3.4.17 - Transportation and Traffic

The VMT analysis has erroneously exempted the project from performing a project-specific VMT analysis. The MND states, “Based on Figure 7 of the City VMT Guidelines, the Project site is located within the seven or less VMT per employee area and would be under the Tulare County average VMT per employee of 8.3. Therefore, based on the screening methods established under the VMT Guidelines, the Project is screened out from a detailed VMT analysis, is consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 Subdivision (b) and would not result in a significant impact.” However, the MND excludes that the City’s VMT Guidelines23 does not permit this exemption for industrial projects. The City s VMT Guidelines state that, “Residential, office, or mixed‐use projects that are consistent with the City s General Plan and located within green‐colored VMT zones, as shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8, respectively, are presumed to have similar low VMT profiles and could be screened out from further VMT analysis.” The City’s VMT Guidelines does not provide any specific exemptions for industrial development. Applying the low VMT area exemption to the proposed project is not consistent with the City s VMT Guidelines and a project- specific quantified VMT analysis must be prepared as part of an EIR.

The MND has not adequately analyzed the project’s potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses; or the project’s potential to result in inadequate emergency access. There are no exhibits depicting the available truck turning radius at the intersection of the project driveways and adjacent streets.

There are also no exhibits adequately depicting the onsite turning radius available for trucks maneuvering throughout the site. The MND states that, “Future development of the site will be designed to meet current standards and safety regulations for transportation. All right-of-way and internal circulation improvements will be constructed to comply with the State and local regulations, and design and safety standards of Chapter 33 of the CBC and Title 24 guidelines to create safe and accessible roadways.” This conclusion is unsupported by meaningful evidence, such as a site plan with a truck turning template overlay to demonstrate that adequate maneuvering area for trucks/trailers is available. This does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA’s requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational documents. An EIR must be prepared to include the City determination/review of the project and the complete Site Plan for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

23 https://www.visalia.city/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=47045 Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

10 The MND provides similar statements regarding emergency access in stating that, “The proposed Project would have to provide adequate unobstructed space for fire trucks to turn around. The proposed Project site would have adequate internal circulation capacity, including entrance and exit routes to provide adequate unobstructed space for fire trucks and other emergency vehicles to gain access and to turn around. The proposed Project would not inhibit the ability of local roadways to continue to accommodate emergency response and evacuation activities.” These statements are also not supported by meaningful evidence, such as a site plan showing the available turn around area for a fire apparatus. This does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA’s requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational documents. An EIR must be prepared to include the City determination/review of the project and the complete Site Plan for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

Additionally, the MND has not provided any analysis of the available horizontal and vertical sight distance at the intersection of the project driveways and adjacent streets. Sight distance is the continuous length of street ahead visible to the driver. At unsignalized intersections, corner sight distance must provide a substantially clear line of sight between the driver of the vehicle waiting on the minor road (driveway) and the driver of an approaching vehicle. An EIR must be prepared with this analysis based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Stopping Sight Distance requirements.

3.4.21 - Mandatory Findings of Significance

An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis discussion here to demonstrate the impact of the proposed project in a cumulative setting. The MND does not discuss or analyze the project’s compliance with the General Plan’s Land Use Buildout Scenario. Table 1-4: Non- Residential Floor Area within the General Plan24 projected new development of 9,690,000 s.f. of industrial uses between 2010 and 2030. Table 1-5: Employment by Sector projects the associated creation of 9,670 jobs in the industrial sector. The MND does not provide any information or analysis on the buildout conditions of the General Plan. The MND has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. The whole of the action proposed by the project (inclusive of SPR22130) proposes the development of 1,553,080 square feet of industrial uses, which is 16% of the City’s industrial buildout accounted for by a single project. Piecemealed YS Industries projects combined with

24 https://www.visalia.city/depts/community_development/planning/gp.asp Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

11 the proposed project cumulatively generate 2,507,328 square feet of industrial uses, which is 25% of the City’s industrial buildout. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed the General Plan buildout scenarios. For example, other recent industrial projects such as Shirk and Riggin Industrial Park Project by Seefried (3,820,000 sf) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 6,327,328 square feet of light industrial space. This represents 64% of the City’s industrial buildout through 2030 accounted for by only five recent projects. These totals increase when other industrial development approved, submitted, or “in the pipeline” since General Plan adoption are added to the total. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic.

Further, Table 1-5: Employment by Sector within the General Plan indicates that the Industrial land use designation will allow for the creation of 9,670 new jobs from 2010-2030. The whole of the action proposed by the project (inclusive of SPR22130) will create 2,071 new jobs, which is 21% of the City’s industrial job buildout accounted for by a single project. Piecemealed YS Industries projects combined with the proposed project cumulatively generate 3,344 industrial employees, which is 34% of the City’s industrial job buildout. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed the General Plan buildout scenarios. For example, other recent industrial projects such as Shirk and Riggin Industrial Park Project by Seefried (3,820,000 sf; 5,094 jobs utilizing General Plan employment generation ratio) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 8,438 industrial jobs. This represents 87% of the City’s industrial job buildout through 2030 accounted for by only five recent projects. These totals increase when other industrial development approved, submitted, or “in the pipeline” since General Plan adoption are added to the total.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the MND is flawed and an EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Brandon Smith
May 14, 2024
Page

12 Sincerely,

Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP

Attachment: SWAPE Analysis

2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
May 10, 2024
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project (SCH No. 2024041004) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the April 2024 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) for the Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project (“Project”) located in the City of Visalia (“City”). The Project proposes to construct 980,100-square-feet (“SF”) of warehouse space on the 75-acre site.

Our review concludes that the IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may be underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Air Quality
Failure to Evaluate Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts Regarding the potential air quality impacts associated with Project construction and operation, the IS/MND states:
“To avoid increased adverse health effects from new construction related PM10 and to address significant nuisance concerns (if any), such as visible clouds of dust and soiling of exposed surfaces, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the applicable SJVAPCD rules and regulations for criteria pollutant generation, a few of which have been listed above. With compliance of applicable SJVAPCD rules and regulations as required by General Plan policy and additional General Plan policies adopted for the purposes of reducing air quality impacts, the

2 Project is expected to have a less than significant impact on criteria pollutants. Therefore, construction of the Project will have a less than significant impact” (p. 3-20).

As discussed, the IS/MND concludes that the Project’s construction-related criteria air pollutant emissions will result in a less-than-significant impact. In regard to the Project’s operational impacts, the IS/MND states:
“As discussed in Impact #3.4.3a, compliance with General Plan policies adopted for the purposes of reducing air quality impacts as a result of General Plan buildout would help in addressing area and mobile sources. Therefore, the Project is anticipated to result in a less than significant impact” (p. 3-21).

As discussed, the IS/MND concludes that the Project’s operational criteria air pollutant emissions will also result in a less-than-significant impact. Lastly, concerning the Project’s potential GHG impacts, the IS/MND states:
“The Project would be consistent with the City of Visalia 2030 General Plan upon preparation and approval of the annexation Therefore, the Project is consistent with the growth assumptions used in the applicable AQP. CARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan builds on the efforts and plans encompassed in the initial Scoping Plan. The current plan has identified new policies and actions to accomplish the State’s 2030 GHG limit. Based on the assessment above, the Project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. The Project furthers the achievement of the County’s greenhouse gas reduction goals. Therefore, any Impacts would be less than significant” (p. 3-47).

As demonstrated in the excerpts above, while the IS/MND recognizes the importance of adhering to guidelines for mitigating air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts, the IS/MND and associated documents fail to quantitatively estimate the Project’s criteria air pollutant or GHG emissions whatsoever. The IS/MND consequently neglects to compare the Project’s construction-related and operational emissions to the applicable San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (“SJVAPCD”) significance thresholds.

To determine whether the Project will result in significant impacts, which should then be addressed and adequately mitigated in a future EIR, we have conducted the following analyses and concluded the following impact determinations:
(1) SWAPE’s air model indicates a potentially significant air quality impact; (2) SWAPE’s screening-level analysis indicates a potentially significant health risk impact; and (3) SWAPE’s air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact. 1) SWAPE’s Air Model Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact In an effort to quantitatively estimate the Project’s construction-related and operational emissions, we used the California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) Version 2020.4.0, as well as Project-specific 3 information provided by the IS/MND. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site- specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type.

Our model included 980,100-SF of “Industrial Park” land use, and we assumed that the Project would be located within Climate Zone 3.1 Consistent with the IS/MND, the Project’s utilities would be provided by Southern California Edison (p. 3 - 95). 2 All other values were left as default.3 Our analysis estimates that the Project’s construction-related reactive organic gasses (“ROG”) emissions exceed the applicable SJVAPCD threshold of 10 tons per year (“tons/year”) (see table below).4 SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Construction ROG
(tons/year)
SWAPE 124.42
SJVAPCD Threshold 10
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated above, the construction-related ROG emissions estimate, as assessed by SWAPE, is approximately 124.42 tons/year, which exceeds the applicable SJVAPCD significance threshold.5 Our modeling demonstrates that the Project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact. As a result, the future EIR should adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the environment.
2) Screening-Level Analysis Indicates Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact In accordance with CEQA, projects are required to make “a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences.”6 In order to analyze the Project’s potential health risk impacts, we conducted a screening-level risk assessment relying upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.7 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”) guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2

1 “Climate Zones Lookup.” Appendix F, CalEEMod User’s Guide, September 2013, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/caleemod-appendixf.pdf. 2 “Incorporated Cities and Counties.” Southern California Edison, available at:
https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/inline-
files/Incorporated_Cities_and_Counties_and_Unicorporated_Areas_Served_by_SCE.pdf . 3 See Attachment A for CalEEMod model.
4 “San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.” SJVAPCD, June 2012, available at :
https://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/FYI-329.pdf, p. 1. 5 681.79 lb/day * (1 ton / 2000 lb) = 0.34 tons/day * 365 days/year = 124.42 tons/year 6 “Sierra Club v. County of Fresno.” Supreme Court of California, December 2018, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/decisions/1907/Sierra%20Club%20v.%20County%20of%20Fresno.pdf . 7 “AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model,” U.S. EPA , April 2011, available at:
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/20110411_aerscreen_release_memo.pdf 4 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”).8, 9 A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach should be conducted prior to approval of the Project.

As previously mentioned, the IS/MND fails to provide CalEEMod output files to model the Project’s construction or operational emissions. Consequently, we prepared a preliminary health risk analysis (“HRA”) of the Project’s construction-related health risk impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM2.5 exhaust estimates from SWAPE’s CalEEMod output files. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life.
10 SWAPE’s CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities will generate approximately 238 pounds of DPM over the 664-day construction period.11 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠� = 237.9 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸
66 4 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑
2 4 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔
3, 600 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00188 grams per second (“g/s”).

Subtracting the 664-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational DPM for an additional 28.18 years. SWAPE’s operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 141 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation:

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠� = 141 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸
36 5 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑
2 4 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔
3, 600 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00203 g/s. Construction and operation were simulated as a 75-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate dimensions of 779- by 390-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of stacks of operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. 8 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf . 9 “Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects.” CAPCOA, July 2009, available at:
https://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6- 09.pdf. 10 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 11 See Attachment B for health risk calculations.
5 An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The population of Visalia was obtained from U.S. 2022 Census data.12 The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project Site. The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) suggests that the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10% in screening procedures.13 The IS/MND does not mention the existence of sensitive receptors, whatsoever. However, review of the AERSCREEN output files demonstrates that the maximally exposed individual receptor (“MEIR”) is located approximately 400 meters from the Project site. Thus, the single- hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 0.379 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 400 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.0379 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project operation, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 0.408 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 400 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.0408 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR.14 We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA, as recommended by SJVAPCD.15 Specifically, guidance from OEHHA and California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) recommends the use of a standard point estimate approach, including high-point estimate (i.e. 95th percentile) breathing rates and age sensitivity factors (“ASF”) in order to account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure and accurately assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. The residential exposure parameters utilized for the various age groups in our screening-level HRA are as follows:
12 “Visalia.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2022, available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0682954. 13 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” U.S. EPA , October 1992, available at:
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/2000F86J.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=1991+Thru+199 4&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=& QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data %5C91thru94%5CTxt%5C00000014%5C2000F86J.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h %7C-
&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeek Page=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&See kPage=x&ZyPURL.
14 See Attachment C for AERSCREEN output files.
15 “Update to District’s Risk Management Policy to Address OEHHA’s Revised Risk Assessment Guidance Document.” SJVAPCD, May 2015, available at: https://www.valleyair.org/busind/pto/staff-report-5-28-15.pdf. 6 Exposure Assumptions for Residential Individual Cancer Risk Age Group
Breathing
Rate
(L/kg-day)16
Age
Sensitivity
Factor17
Exposure
Duration
(years)
Fraction of
Time at
Home18
Exposure
Frequency
(days/year)19
Exposure
Time
(hours/day)
3rd Trimester 361 10 0.25 1 350 24
Infant (0 - 2) 1090 10 2 1 350 24
Child (2 - 16) 572 3 14 1 350 24
Adult (16 - 30) 261 1 14 0.73 350 24
For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify dose for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor (“CPF”) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day
-1) to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to assess exposures, we utilized the following dose algorithm:

𝐷𝐷𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴,𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑝𝑝 = 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 × 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × � 𝐵𝐵𝑅𝑅 𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵� × 𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶𝐸𝐸
w here:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (μg/m3)
EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days)
BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg/day) A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1)
CF = conversion factor (1x10-6, μg to mg, L to m3)
To calculate the overall cancer risk, we used the following equation for each appropriate age group:

𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅
𝑔𝑔 𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 = 𝐷𝐷𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐸𝐸 × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐸𝐸 × 𝐸𝐸𝐴𝐴𝐹𝐹 × 𝐸𝐸𝐷𝐷 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴
16 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-s ource/planning/risk- assessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 19; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf . 17 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf , p. 8-5 T able 8.3. 18 “Risk Assessment Procedures.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7. 19 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf , p. 5-24. 7 where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg/day)-1 ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group
FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only) ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (always 70 years) Consistent with the 664-day construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years) and the first 1.57 years of the infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years). The annualized average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the latter 0.43 years of the infantile stage of life, as well as the entire child (2 – 16 years) and adult (16 – 30 years) stages of life. The results of our calculations are shown in the table below.

The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group Emissions Source Duration (years) Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.0379 4.38E-07
Construction 1.57 0.0379 8.30E-06
Operation 0.43 0.0408 2.46E-06
Infant (0 - 2) Total 2 1.08E-05
Child (2 - 16) Operation 14 0.0408 1.06E-05
Adult (16 - 30) Operation 14 0.0408 1.64E-06
Lifetime 30 2.35E-05
As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 400 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, are approximately 0.438, 10.8, 10.6, and 1.64 in one million, respectively.

The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) is approximately 23.5 in one million, which exceeds the SJVAPCD threshold of 20 in one million and results in a potentially significant impact.

Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level HRA is to demonstrate the potential link between Project-generated emissions and adverse health risk impacts. According to the U.S. EPA:
8 “EPA’s Exposure Assessment Guidelines recommend completing exposure assessments iteratively using a tiered approach to ‘strike a balance between the costs of adding detail and refinement to an assessment and the benefits associated with that additional refinement’ (U.S.

EPA, 1992).

In other words, an assessment using basic tools (e.g., simple exposure calculations, default values, rules of thumb, conservative assumptions) can be conducted as the first phase (or tier) of the overall assessment (i.e., a screening-level assessment).

The exposure assessor or risk manager can then determine whether the results of the screening- level assessment warrant further evaluation through refinements of the input data and exposure assumptions or by using more advanced models.” As demonstrated above, screening-level analyses warrant further evaluation in a refined modeling approach. As our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, the future EIR should be prepared to include a refined health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation. If the refined analysis similarly concludes that the Project would result in a significant health risk impact, then mitigation measures should be incorporated, as described below in the “Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions” section. 3) SWAPE’s Air Model Indicates a Potentially Significant Greenhouse Gas Impact SWAPE’s CalEEMod output files disclose the Project’s mitigated emissions, which include approximately 5,991.05 MT CO2e/year of annual operational emissions (sum of area-, energy-, mobile-, waste-, and water-related emissions). When amortizing the Project’s construction-related GHG emissions over a period of 30 years and summing them with the Project’s operational GHG emissions, we estimate net annual GHG emissions of approximately 6,025.64 MT CO2e/year (see table below). 9 SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Phase Proposed Project
(MT CO2e/year)
Total Construction 1,038.41
Construction (amortized over 30 years) 18.31
Area 0.0187
Energy 2,224.22
Mobile 2,628.5
Waste 611.18
Water 527.12
Annual Operational 5,991.05
Total Net Annual GHG Emissions 6,025.64
Reductions Required by SJVAPCD Threshold (29% of
BAU Emissions) 1,747.43
Exceeds? Yes
A
s demonstrated above, in order to conclude a less-than-significant GHG impact, the Project must demonstrate consistency with the SJVAPCD’s 29% reduction threshold.20 Specifically, the Project must mitigate GHG emissions by 29% as compared to Business-as-Usual (“BAU”) emissions, consistent with the GHG emission reduction targets established in the California Air Resources Board’s AB 32 Scoping Plan. As such, the Project must reduce its GHG emissions by 1,747,23 MT CO2e/year in order to be consistent with SJVAPCD and CARB.21 An updated EIR analysis should be prepared that includes a GHG analysis and incorporates mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to meet the SJVAPCD threshold.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. To reduce emissions, the Project should consider the implementation of the following mitigation measures found in the California Department of Justice Warehouse Project Best Practices document.22
20 “Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Land Use Development Projects” San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, available at:
http://www.valleyair.org/Programs/CCAP/bps/Fact_Sheet_Development_Sources.pdf . 21 6,025.64 MT CO2e/year * (0.29 of BAU Emissions) = 1,747,43 MT CO2e/year 22 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at :
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10. 10 • Requiring off-road construction equipment to be hybrid electric-diesel or zero emission, where available, and all diesel-fueled off-road construction equipment to be equipped with CARB Tier IV-compliant engines or better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply the compliant construction equipment for use prior to any ground-disturbing and construction activities.
• Prohibiting off-road diesel-powered equipment from being in the “on” position for more than 10 hours per day.
• Using electric-powered hand tools, forklifts, and pressure washers, and providing electrical hook ups to the power grid rather than use of diesel-fueled generators to supply their power. • Designating an area in the construction site where electric-powered construction vehicles and equipment can charge.
• Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area. • Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for p
articulates or ozone for the project area.
• Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than three minutes. • Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all e
quipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission control tier classifications.
• Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts. • Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
• Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction employees.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations fo r
c
onstruction employees.
• Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles engaged in drayage to or from the project site to be zero- emission beginning in 2030.
• Requiring all on-site motorized operational equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be zero-emission with the necessary charging or fueling stations provided. • Requiring tenants to use zero-emission light- and medium-duty vehicles as part of business operations.
• Forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes and requiring operators to turn off e
ngines when not in use.
• Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the local air district, and the building manager.
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity that is equal to or greater than the building’s projected energy needs, including all
e
lectrical chargers.
11 • Designing all project building roofs to accommodate the maximum future coverage of solar panels and installing the maximum solar power generation capacity feasible. • Constructing zero-emission truck charging/fueling stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project.
• Running conduit to designated locations for future electric truck charging stations. • Unless the owner of the facility records a covenant on the title of the underlying property ensuring that the property cannot be used to provide refrigerated warehouse space, constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door and requiring truck operators with transport refrigeration units to use the electric plugs when at loading docks.
• Oversizing electrical rooms by 25 percent or providing a secondary electrical room to accommodate future expansion of electric vehicle charging capability. • Constructing and maintaining electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of employee parking spaces (for example, requiring at least 10% of all employee parking spaces to be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations of at least Level 2 charging performance)
• Running conduit to an additional proportion of employee parking spaces for a future increase in the number of electric light-duty charging stations.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, air filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the project.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project, and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid exposure to unhealthy air.
• Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel. • Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks. • Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single- occupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation, including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
• Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. • Designing to LEED green building certification standards. • Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations. • Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route. • Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project area.
12 • Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program, and requiring tenants who own, operate, or hire trucking carriers with more than 100 trucks to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers.
• Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation.

An EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to maximum extent possible. The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s potentially significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sin
cerely,
Ma
tt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Pa
ul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: SWAPE's CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment B: Updated Health Risk Calculations
Attachment C: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment D: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment E: Paul Rosenfeld CV
Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Land Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Energy Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Industrial Park 980.10 1000sqft 22.50 980,100.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2026Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PMPage 1 of 34 Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Attachment A

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 2 of 34 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2024

0.2441

2.0428

2.2572

6.3000e-
003

0.4952

0.0750

0.5702

0.1785

0.0698

0.2483

0.0000
570.0257
570.0257

0.0796

0.0282
580.4107
2025

0.3445

2.6419

3.5113

0.0111

0.5692

0.0769

0.6461

0.1545

0.0724

0.2269

0.0000
1,016.311
7 1,016.311
7 0.0815

0.0673
1,038.409
9 2026

6.8313

0.1289

0.2227

4.4000e-
004

0.0143

5.6200e-
003

0.0199

3.8400e-
003

5.2300e-
003

9.0700e-
003

0.0000

39.6746

7.6800e-
003

9.0000e-
004

40.1352
Maximum

6.8313

2.6419

3.5113

0.0111

0.5692

0.0769

0.6461

0.1785

0.0724

0.2483

0.0000
1,016.311
7 1,016.311
7 0.0815

0.0673
1,038.409
9 Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2024

0.2441

2.0428

2.2572

6.3000e-
003

0.4952

0.0750

0.5702

0.1785

0.0698

0.2483

0.0000
570.0253
570.0253

0.0796

0.0282
580.4104
2025

0.3445

2.6419

3.5113

0.0111

0.5692

0.0769

0.6461

0.1545

0.0724

0.2269

0.0000
1,016.311
3 1,016.311
3 0.0815

0.0673
1,038.409
6 2026

6.8313

0.1289

0.2227

4.4000e-
004

0.0143

5.6200e-
003

0.0199

3.8400e-
003

5.2300e-
003

9.0700e-
003

0.0000

39.6745

7.6800e-
003

9.0000e-
004

40.1352
Maximum

6.8313

2.6419

3.5113

0.0111

0.5692

0.0769

0.6461

0.1785

0.0724

0.2483

0.0000
1,016.311
3 1,016.311
3 0.0815

0.0673
1,038.409
6 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 3 of 34 ends

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 5-7-2024
8-6-2024

1.0149

1.0149
2 8-7-2024
11-6-2024

0.7943

0.7943
3 11-7-2024
2-6-2025

0.7862

0.7862
4 2-7-2025
5-6-2025

0.7302

0.7302
5 5-7-2025
8-6-2025

0.7459

0.7459
6 8-7-2025
11-6-2025

0.7519

0.7519
7 11-7-2025
2-6-2026

1.5672

1.5672
8 2-7-2026
5-6-2026

5.8549

5.8549
Highest

5.8549

5.8549
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 4 of 34 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Energy

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
2,212.276
8 2,212.276
8 0.1426

0.0281
2,224.219
2 Mobile

1.2632

2.1748

11.5138

0.0279

2.8409

0.0248

2.8657

0.7602

0.0233

0.7835

0.0000
2,581.314
1 2,581.314
1 0.1365

0.1469
2,628.502
9 Waste

0.0000

0.0000
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Water

0.0000

71.9050
217.4953
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Total

5.8415

2.7956

12.0442

0.0316

2.8409

0.0720

2.9129

0.7602

0.0705

0.8307
318.6040
5,011.103
8 5,329.707
8 22.2624

0.3516
5,991.049
0 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 5 of 34 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Energy

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
2,212.276
8 2,212.276
8 0.1426

0.0281
2,224.219
2 Mobile

1.2632

2.1748

11.5138

0.0279

2.8409

0.0248

2.8657

0.7602

0.0233

0.7835

0.0000
2,581.314
1 2,581.314
1 0.1365

0.1469
2,628.502
9 Waste

0.0000

0.0000
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Water

0.0000

71.9050
217.4953
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Total

5.8415

2.7956

12.0442

0.0316

2.8409

0.0720

2.9129

0.7602

0.0705

0.8307
318.6040
5,011.103
8 5,329.707
8 22.2624

0.3516
5,991.049
0 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 6 of 34 ends

4 Building Construction
Building Construction
8/6/2024
1/5/2026
5 370
5 Paving
Paving
1/6/2026
2/2/2026
5 20
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/3/2026
3/2/2026
5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.29 Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.48 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,470,150; Non-Residential Outdoor: 490,050; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 105
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 7 of 34 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0224

0.2088

0.1971

3.9000e-
004

9.6000e-
003

8.9200e-
003

0.0000

33.9961

9.5100e-
003

0.0000

34.2338
Total

0.0224

0.2088

0.1971

3.9000e-
004

9.6000e-
003

8.9200e-
003

0.0000

33.9961

9.5100e-
003

0.0000

34.2338
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 412.00
161.00

0.00 10.80

7.30 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 82.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 8 of 34 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9277

3.0000e-
005

0.9361
Total

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9277

3.0000e-
005

0.9361
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0224

0.2088

0.1971

3.9000e-
004

9.6000e-
003

8.9200e-
003

0.0000

33.9960

9.5100e-
003

0.0000

34.2338
Total

0.0224

0.2088

0.1971

3.9000e-
004

9.6000e-
003

8.9200e-
003

0.0000

33.9960

9.5100e-
003

0.0000

34.2338
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 9 of 34 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9277

3.0000e-
005

0.9361
Total

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9277

3.0000e-
005

0.9361
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0983

0.0000

0.0983

0.0505

0.0000

0.0505

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0133

0.1359

0.0917

1.9000e-
004

6.1500e-
003

5.6600e-
003

0.0000

16.7285

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8638
Total

0.0133

0.1359

0.0917

1.9000e-
004

0.0983

6.1500e-
003

0.1044

0.0505

5.6600e-
003

0.0562

0.0000

16.7285

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8638
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 10 of 34 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.6000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5566

2.0000e-
005

0.5617
Total

2.6000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5566

2.0000e-
005

0.5617
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0983

0.0000

0.0983

0.0505

0.0000

0.0505

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0133

0.1359

0.0917

1.9000e-
004

6.1500e-
003

5.6500e-
003

0.0000

16.7285

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8638
Total

0.0133

0.1359

0.0917

1.9000e-
004

0.0983

6.1500e-
003

0.1044

0.0505

5.6500e-
003

0.0562

0.0000

16.7285

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8638
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 11 of 34 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.6000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5566

2.0000e-
005

0.5617
Total

2.6000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5566

2.0000e-
005

0.5617
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.1611

0.0000

0.1611

0.0639

0.0000

0.0639

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0563

0.5666

0.4852

1.0900e-
003

0.0234

0.0215

0.0000

95.4092

0.0309

0.0000

96.1806
Total

0.0563

0.5666

0.4852

1.0900e-
003

0.1611

0.0234

0.1844

0.0639

0.0215

0.0854

0.0000

95.4092

0.0309

0.0000

96.1806
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 12 of 34 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0100e-
003

6.5000e-
004

8.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.1645

6.0000e-
005

2.1843
Total

1.0100e-
003

6.5000e-
004

8.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.1645

6.0000e-
005

2.1843
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.1611

0.0000

0.1611

0.0639

0.0000

0.0639

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0563

0.5666

0.4852

1.0900e-
003

0.0234

0.0215

0.0000

95.4091

0.0309

0.0000

96.1805
Total

0.0563

0.5666

0.4852

1.0900e-
003

0.1611

0.0234

0.1844

0.0639

0.0215

0.0854

0.0000

95.4091

0.0309

0.0000

96.1805
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 13 of 34 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0100e-
003

6.5000e-
004

8.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.1645

6.0000e-
005

2.1843
Total

1.0100e-
003

6.5000e-
004

8.0200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.1645

6.0000e-
005

2.1843
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0780

0.7125

0.8568

1.4300e-
003

0.0325

0.0306

0.0000
122.8800
122.8800

0.0291

0.0000
123.6065
Total

0.0780

0.7125

0.8568

1.4300e-
003

0.0325

0.0306

0.0000
122.8800
122.8800

0.0291

0.0000
123.6065
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 14 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

9.1600e-
003

0.3775

0.1127

1.6900e-
003

0.0566

2.4600e-
003

0.0590

0.0164

2.3500e-
003

0.0187

0.0000
162.3214
162.3214

6.7000e-
004

0.0243
169.5719
Worker

0.0632

0.0405

0.5002

1.4700e-
003

0.1746

8.7000e-
004

0.1755

0.0464

8.0000e-
004

0.0472

0.0000
135.0417
135.0417

3.9600e-
003

3.8000e-
003
136.2722
Total

0.0723

0.4179

0.6129

3.1600e-
003

0.2312

3.3300e-
003

0.2345

0.0628

3.1500e-
003

0.0659

0.0000
297.3631
297.3631

4.6300e-
003

0.0281
305.8440
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0780

0.7125

0.8568

1.4300e-
003

0.0325

0.0306

0.0000
122.8799
122.8799

0.0291

0.0000
123.6063
Total

0.0780

0.7125

0.8568

1.4300e-
003

0.0325

0.0306

0.0000
122.8799
122.8799

0.0291

0.0000
123.6063
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 15 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

9.1600e-
003

0.3775

0.1127

1.6900e-
003

0.0566

2.4600e-
003

0.0590

0.0164

2.3500e-
003

0.0187

0.0000
162.3214
162.3214

6.7000e-
004

0.0243
169.5719
Worker

0.0632

0.0405

0.5002

1.4700e-
003

0.1746

8.7000e-
004

0.1755

0.0464

8.0000e-
004

0.0472

0.0000
135.0417
135.0417

3.9600e-
003

3.8000e-
003
136.2722
Total

0.0723

0.4179

0.6129

3.1600e-
003

0.2312

3.3300e-
003

0.2345

0.0628

3.1500e-
003

0.0659

0.0000
297.3631
297.3631

4.6300e-
003

0.0281
305.8440
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Total

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 16 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0220

0.9262

0.2717

4.0900e-
003

0.1393

6.0500e-
003

0.1454

0.0403

5.7900e-
003

0.0460

0.0000
392.4017
392.4017

1.5900e-
003

0.0586
409.9134
Worker

0.1440

0.0884

1.1405

3.5000e-
003

0.4298

2.0400e-
003

0.4319

0.1143

1.8800e-
003

0.1161

0.0000
321.2550
321.2550

8.7700e-
003

8.6900e-
003
324.0630
Total

0.1660

1.0147

1.4123

7.5900e-
003

0.5692

8.0900e-
003

0.5773

0.1545

7.6700e-
003

0.1622

0.0000
713.6568
713.6568

0.0104

0.0673
733.9764
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Total

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 17 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0220

0.9262

0.2717

4.0900e-
003

0.1393

6.0500e-
003

0.1454

0.0403

5.7900e-
003

0.0460

0.0000
392.4017
392.4017

1.5900e-
003

0.0586
409.9134
Worker

0.1440

0.0884

1.1405

3.5000e-
003

0.4298

2.0400e-
003

0.4319

0.1143

1.8800e-
003

0.1161

0.0000
321.2550
321.2550

8.7700e-
003

8.6900e-
003
324.0630
Total

0.1660

1.0147

1.4123

7.5900e-
003

0.5692

8.0900e-
003

0.5773

0.1545

7.6700e-
003

0.1622

0.0000
713.6568
713.6568

0.0104

0.0673
733.9764
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

2.0500e-
003

0.0187

0.0241

4.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

0.0000

3.4788

8.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.4992
Total

2.0500e-
003

0.0187

0.0241

4.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

0.0000

3.4788

8.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.4992
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 18 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.5000e-
004

0.0106

3.0700e-
003

5.0000e-
005

1.6000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.6000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000

4.4256

2.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

4.6229
Worker

1.5400e-
003

9.1000e-
004

0.0123

4.0000e-
005

4.9400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.9600e-
003

1.3100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.3300e-
003

0.0000

3.5795

9.0000e-
005

3.6096
Total

1.7900e-
003

0.0115

0.0154

9.0000e-
005

6.5400e-
003

9.0000e-
005

6.6300e-
003

1.7700e-
003

9.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

8.0050

1.1000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

8.2325
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

2.0500e-
003

0.0187

0.0241

4.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

0.0000

3.4788

8.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.4992
Total

2.0500e-
003

0.0187

0.0241

4.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

0.0000

3.4788

8.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.4992
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 19 of 34 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.5000e-
004

0.0106

3.0700e-
003

5.0000e-
005

1.6000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.6000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000

4.4256

2.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

4.6229
Worker

1.5400e-
003

9.1000e-
004

0.0123

4.0000e-
005

4.9400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.9600e-
003

1.3100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.3300e-
003

0.0000

3.5795

9.0000e-
005

3.6096
Total

1.7900e-
003

0.0115

0.0154

9.0000e-
005

6.5400e-
003

9.0000e-
005

6.6300e-
003

1.7700e-
003

9.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

8.0050

1.1000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

8.2325
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

9.1500e-
003

0.0858

0.1458

2.3000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

3.8500e-
003

0.0000

20.0193

6.4700e-
003

0.0000

20.1811
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

9.1500e-
003

0.0858

0.1458

2.3000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

3.8500e-
003

0.0000

20.0193

6.4700e-
003

0.0000

20.1811
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 20 of 34 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.7000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.9900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.8688

2.0000e-
005

0.8761
Total

3.7000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.9900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.8688

2.0000e-
005

0.8761
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

9.1500e-
003

0.0858

0.1458

2.3000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

3.8500e-
003

0.0000

20.0192

6.4700e-
003

0.0000

20.1811
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

9.1500e-
003

0.0858

0.1458

2.3000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

3.8500e-
003

0.0000

20.0192

6.4700e-
003

0.0000

20.1811
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 21 of 34 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.7000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.9900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.8688

2.0000e-
005

0.8761
Total

3.7000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.9900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.8688

2.0000e-
005

0.8761
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

6.8142

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.7100e-
003

0.0115

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5567
Total

6.8159

0.0115

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5567
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 22 of 34 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0500e-
003

1.2100e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

6.5600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000

4.7494

1.2000e-
004

4.7895
Total

2.0500e-
003

1.2100e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

6.5600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000

4.7494

1.2000e-
004

4.7895
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

6.8142

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.7100e-
003

0.0115

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5567
Total

6.8159

0.0115

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5567
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 23 of 34 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0500e-
003

1.2100e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

6.5600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000

4.7494

1.2000e-
004

4.7895
Total

2.0500e-
003

1.2100e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

6.5600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000

4.7494

1.2000e-
004

4.7895
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 24 of 34 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.2632

2.1748

11.5138

0.0279

2.8409

0.0248

2.8657

0.7602

0.0233

0.7835

0.0000
2,581.314
1 2,581.314
1 0.1365

0.1469
2,628.502
9 Unmitigated

1.2632

2.1748

11.5138

0.0279

2.8409

0.0248

2.8657

0.7602

0.0233

0.7835

0.0000
2,581.314
1 2,581.314
1 0.1365

0.1469
2,628.502
9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Industrial Park
3,302.94
2,489.45
1215.32
7,573,137
7,573,137
Total
3,302.94
2,489.45
1,215.32
7,573,137
7,573,137
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Industrial Park

9.50 7.30

7.30 59.00

28.00 13.00
79 19
2 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Industrial Park

0.522587

0.052580

0.171418

0.151108

0.026705

0.007202

0.013509

0.026273

0.000644

0.000311

0.023009

0.001408

0.003247
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 25 of 34 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000
1,536.536
7 1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000
1,536.536
7 1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 26 of 34 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Industrial Park

1.26629e
+007

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
Total

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Industrial Park

1.26629e
+007

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
Total

0.0683

0.6207

0.5214

3.7200e-
003

0.0472

0.0000
675.7401
675.7401

0.0130

0.0124
679.7557
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 27 of 34 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Industrial Park

8.66408e
+006
1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Total
1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Industrial Park

8.66408e
+006
1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Total
1,536.536
7 0.1297

0.0157
1,544.463
4 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 28 of 34 ends

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Unmitigated

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.6814

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8278

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

8.3000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Total

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 29 of 34 ends

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.6814

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8278

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

8.3000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Total

4.5100

8.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0175

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0187
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 30 of 34 ends

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Unmitigated
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Industrial Park
226.648 /
0 289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Total
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 31 of 34 ends

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Industrial Park
226.648 /
0 289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Total
289.4003

7.4037

0.1766
527.1220
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Unmitigated
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 32 of 34 ends

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Industrial Park
1215.32
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Total
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Industrial Park
1215.32
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Total
246.6990

14.5795

0.0000
611.1863
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 33 of 34 ends

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:36 PM

Page 34 of 34 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Land Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Energy Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Industrial Park
980.10
1000sqft

22.50 980,100.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.7 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2026
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 1 of 29 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 2 of 29 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

3.2849

32.4114

29.1392

0.0891

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,982.058
8 8,982.058
8 1.9475

0.5795
9,172.187
4 2025

2.8143

19.8871

28.1870

0.0875

4.4760

0.5895

5.0656

1.2121

0.5550

1.7670

0.0000
8,817.405
3 8,817.405
3 0.6854

0.5646
9,002.791
3 2026
681.8210

19.7859

27.5189

0.0860

4.4760

0.5886

5.0646

1.2121

0.5541

1.7662

0.0000
8,664.263
4 8,664.263
4 0.7161

0.5505
8,845.270
1 Maximum
681.8210

32.4114

29.1392

0.0891

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,982.058
8 8,982.058
8 1.9475

0.5795
9,172.187
4 Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

3.2849

32.4114

29.1392

0.0891

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,982.058
8 8,982.058
8 1.9475

0.5795
9,172.187
4 2025

2.8143

19.8871

28.1870

0.0875

4.4760

0.5895

5.0656

1.2121

0.5550

1.7670

0.0000
8,817.405
3 8,817.405
3 0.6854

0.5646
9,002.791
3 2026
681.8210

19.7859

27.5189

0.0860

4.4760

0.5886

5.0646

1.2121

0.5541

1.7662

0.0000
8,664.263
4 8,664.263
4 0.7161

0.5505
8,845.270
1 Maximum
681.8210

32.4114

29.1392

0.0891

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,982.058
8 8,982.058
8 1.9475

0.5795
9,172.187
4 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 3 of 29 ends

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 4 of 29 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Energy

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mobile

9.6056

12.8586

77.1740

0.1861

18.3338

0.1559

18.4897

4.8951

0.1465

5.0416
18,979.98
52 18,979.98
52 0.9021

0.9919
19,298.13
32 Total

34.6969

16.2608

80.1309

0.2065

18.3338

0.4148

18.7486

4.8951

0.4053

5.3004
23,061.71
21 23,061.71
21 0.9809

1.0668
23,404.12
83 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Energy

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mobile

9.6056

12.8586

77.1740

0.1861

18.3338

0.1559

18.4897

4.8951

0.1465

5.0416
18,979.98
52 18,979.98
52 0.9021

0.9919
19,298.13
32 Total

34.6969

16.2608

80.1309

0.2065

18.3338

0.4148

18.7486

4.8951

0.4053

5.3004
23,061.71
21 23,061.71
21 0.9809

1.0668
23,404.12
83 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 5 of 29 ends

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
5/7/2024
6/3/2024
5 20
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
6/4/2024
6/17/2024
5 10
3 Grading
Grading
6/18/2024
8/5/2024
5 35
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
8/6/2024
1/5/2026
5 370
5 Paving
Paving
1/6/2026
2/2/2026
5 20
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/3/2026
3/2/2026
5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.29 Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,470,150; Non-Residential Outdoor: 490,050; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 105
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 6 of 29 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.48 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 412.00
161.00

0.00 10.80

7.30 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 82.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 7 of 29 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.8922
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Total

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.8922
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0501

0.0259

0.3960

1.1000e-
003

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332
111.1575
111.1575

2.8700e-
003

2.7400e-
003
112.0464
Total

0.0501

0.0259

0.3960

1.1000e-
003

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332
111.1575
111.1575

2.8700e-
003

2.7400e-
003
112.0464
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 8 of 29 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Total

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0501

0.0259

0.3960

1.1000e-
003

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332
111.1575
111.1575

2.8700e-
003

2.7400e-
003
112.0464
Total

0.0501

0.0259

0.3960

1.1000e-
003

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332
111.1575
111.1575

2.8700e-
003

2.7400e-
003
112.0464
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 9 of 29 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

19.6570

0.0000

19.6570

10.1025

0.0000

10.1025

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

1.2294

1.1310

1.1310
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Total

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

19.6570

1.2294

20.8864

10.1025

1.1310

11.2335
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0601

0.0310

0.4752

1.3200e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
133.3890
133.3890

3.4500e-
003

3.2900e-
003
134.4557
Total

0.0601

0.0310

0.4752

1.3200e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
133.3890
133.3890

3.4500e-
003

3.2900e-
003
134.4557
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 10 of 29 ends

19.6570

0.0000

19.6570

10.1025

0.0000

10.1025

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

1.2294

1.1310

0.0000
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Total

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

19.6570

1.2294

20.8864

10.1025

1.1310

11.2335

0.0000
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0601

0.0310

0.4752

1.3200e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
133.3890
133.3890

3.4500e-
003

3.2900e-
003
134.4557
Total

0.0601

0.0310

0.4752

1.3200e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
133.3890
133.3890

3.4500e-
003

3.2900e-
003
134.4557
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 11 of 29 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

9.2036

0.0000

9.2036

3.6538

0.0000

3.6538

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

1.3354

1.2286

1.2286
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Total

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

9.2036

1.3354

10.5390

3.6538

1.2286

4.8823
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0668

0.0345

0.5280

1.4700e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
148.2100
148.2100

3.8300e-
003

3.6600e-
003
149.3952
Total

0.0668

0.0345

0.5280

1.4700e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
148.2100
148.2100

3.8300e-
003

3.6600e-
003
149.3952
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 12 of 29 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

9.2036

0.0000

9.2036

3.6538

0.0000

3.6538

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

1.3354

1.2286

0.0000
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Total

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

9.2036

1.3354

10.5390

3.6538

1.2286

4.8823

0.0000
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0668

0.0345

0.5280

1.4700e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
148.2100
148.2100

3.8300e-
003

3.6600e-
003
149.3952
Total

0.0668

0.0345

0.5280

1.4700e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
148.2100
148.2100

3.8300e-
003

3.6600e-
003
149.3952
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 13 of 29 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.5769
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Total

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.5769
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1789

6.8099

2.0953

0.0319

1.0916

0.0463

1.1379

0.3143

0.0443

0.3587
3,373.235
0 3,373.235
0 0.0142

0.5042
3,523.838
3 Worker

1.3752

0.7100

10.8771

0.0302

3.3845

0.0165

3.4010

0.8977

0.0152

0.9129
3,053.124
9 3,053.124
9 0.0789

0.0753
3,077.541
5 Total

1.5541

7.5199

12.9724

0.0621

4.4760

0.0628

4.5388

1.2120

0.0595

1.2715
6,426.359
9 6,426.359
9 0.0931

0.5795
6,601.379
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 14 of 29 ends

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Total

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1789

6.8099

2.0953

0.0319

1.0916

0.0463

1.1379

0.3143

0.0443

0.3587
3,373.235
0 3,373.235
0 0.0142

0.5042
3,523.838
3 Worker

1.3752

0.7100

10.8771

0.0302

3.3845

0.0165

3.4010

0.8977

0.0152

0.9129
3,053.124
9 3,053.124
9 0.0789

0.0753
3,077.541
5 Total

1.5541

7.5199

12.9724

0.0621

4.4760

0.0628

4.5388

1.2120

0.0595

1.2715
6,426.359
9 6,426.359
9 0.0931

0.5795
6,601.379
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 15 of 29 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1747

6.7870

2.0509

0.0313

1.0916

0.0463

1.1379

0.3143

0.0443

0.3586
3,311.811
4 3,311.811
4 0.0136

0.4946
3,459.543
2 Worker

1.2722

0.6305

10.0515

0.0292

3.3845

0.0157

3.4001

0.8977

0.0144

0.9121
2,949.119
5 2,949.119
5 0.0709

0.0700
2,971.750
0 Total

1.4469

7.4175

12.1024

0.0605

4.4760

0.0620

4.5380

1.2121

0.0587

1.2708
6,260.930
9 6,260.930
9 0.0845

0.5646
6,431.293
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 16 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1747

6.7870

2.0509

0.0313

1.0916

0.0463

1.1379

0.3143

0.0443

0.3586
3,311.811
4 3,311.811
4 0.0136

0.4946
3,459.543
2 Worker

1.2722

0.6305

10.0515

0.0292

3.3845

0.0157

3.4001

0.8977

0.0144

0.9121
2,949.119
5 2,949.119
5 0.0709

0.0700
2,971.750
0 Total

1.4469

7.4175

12.1024

0.0605

4.4760

0.0620

4.5380

1.2121

0.0587

1.2708
6,260.930
9 6,260.930
9 0.0845

0.5646
6,431.293
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 17 of 29 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1710

6.7503

2.0147

0.0308

1.0916

0.0461

1.1377

0.3143

0.0441

0.3584
3,249.552
0 3,249.552
0 0.0131

0.4849
3,394.366
8 Worker

1.1835

0.5659

9.4195

0.0283

3.3845

0.0149

3.3994

0.8977

0.0138

0.9115
2,858.237
0 2,858.237
0 0.0642

0.0657
2,879.405
2 Total

1.3545

7.3162

11.4342

0.0590

4.4760

0.0610

4.5371

1.2121

0.0578

1.2699
6,107.789
0 6,107.789
0 0.0773

0.5505
6,273.772
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 18 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1710

6.7503

2.0147

0.0308

1.0916

0.0461

1.1377

0.3143

0.0441

0.3584
3,249.552
0 3,249.552
0 0.0131

0.4849
3,394.366
8 Worker

1.1835

0.5659

9.4195

0.0283

3.3845

0.0149

3.3994

0.8977

0.0138

0.9115
2,858.237
0 2,858.237
0 0.0642

0.0657
2,879.405
2 Total

1.3545

7.3162

11.4342

0.0590

4.4760

0.0610

4.5371

1.2121

0.0578

1.2699
6,107.789
0 6,107.789
0 0.0773

0.5505
6,273.772
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 19 of 29 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.3850
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.3850
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0431

0.0206

0.3429

1.0300e-
003

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332
104.0620
104.0620

2.3400e-
003

2.3900e-
003
104.8327
Total

0.0431

0.0206

0.3429

1.0300e-
003

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332
104.0620
104.0620

2.3400e-
003

2.3900e-
003
104.8327
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 20 of 29 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0431

0.0206

0.3429

1.0300e-
003

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332
104.0620
104.0620

2.3400e-
003

2.3900e-
003
104.8327
Total

0.0431

0.0206

0.3429

1.0300e-
003

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332
104.0620
104.0620

2.3400e-
003

2.3900e-
003
104.8327
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 21 of 29 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
681.4145

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total
681.5854

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.2356

0.1126

1.8748

5.6300e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
568.8724
568.8724

0.0128

0.0131
573.0855
Total

0.2356

0.1126

1.8748

5.6300e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
568.8724
568.8724

0.0128

0.0131
573.0855
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 22 of 29 ends

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total
681.5854

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.2356

0.1126

1.8748

5.6300e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
568.8724
568.8724

0.0128

0.0131
573.0855
Total

0.2356

0.1126

1.8748

5.6300e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
568.8724
568.8724

0.0128

0.0131
573.0855
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 23 of 29 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

9.6056

12.8586

77.1740

0.1861

18.3338

0.1559

18.4897

4.8951

0.1465

5.0416
18,979.98
52 18,979.98
52 0.9021

0.9919
19,298.13
32 Unmitigated

9.6056

12.8586

77.1740

0.1861

18.3338

0.1559

18.4897

4.8951

0.1465

5.0416
18,979.98
52 18,979.98
52 0.9021

0.9919
19,298.13
32 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

9.50 7.30

7.30 59.00

28.00 13.00
79 19
2 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Industrial Park

0.522587

0.052580

0.171418

0.151108

0.026705

0.007202

0.013509

0.026273

0.000644

0.000311

0.023009

0.001408

0.003247
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 24 of 29 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Industrial Park
34692.9

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Total

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 25 of 29 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Unmitigated

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285

34.6929

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Total

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 26 of 29 ends

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating

3.7338

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

20.9741

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

9.1900e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Total

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 27 of 29 ends

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

3.7338

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

20.9741

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

9.1900e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Total

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:34 PM

Page 28 of 29 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

Page 29 of 29 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project
San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Land Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Energy Use - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with information provided by the IS/MND.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Industrial Park
980.10
1000sqft

22.50 980,100.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.7 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2026
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 1 of 29 ends

Shirk and Riggin Annexation Project - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 2 of 29 ends

3.2779

32.4176

28.1768

0.0858

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,653.208
5 8,653.208
5 1.9480

0.5897
8,846.601
6 2025

2.6721

20.4827

26.8834

0.0844

4.4760

0.5897

5.0657

1.2121

0.5551

1.7672

0.0000
8,500.722
2 8,500.722
2 0.6937

0.5741
8,689.147
9 2026
681.7973

20.3665

26.3203

0.0830

4.4760

0.5887

5.0648

1.2121

0.5542

1.7663

0.0000
8,358.077
4 8,358.077
4 0.7163

0.5594
8,541.936
7 Maximum
681.7973

32.4176

28.1768

0.0858

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,653.208
5 8,653.208
5 1.9480

0.5897
8,846.601
6 Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

3.2779

32.4176

28.1768

0.0858

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,653.208
5 8,653.208
5 1.9480

0.5897
8,846.601
6 2025

2.6721

20.4827

26.8834

0.0844

4.4760

0.5897

5.0657

1.2121

0.5551

1.7672

0.0000
8,500.722
2 8,500.722
2 0.6937

0.5741
8,689.147
9 2026
681.7973

20.3665

26.3203

0.0830

4.4760

0.5887

5.0648

1.2121

0.5542

1.7663

0.0000
8,358.077
4 8,358.077
4 0.7163

0.5594
8,541.936
7 Maximum
681.7973

32.4176

28.1768

0.0858

19.8049

1.3362

21.0350

10.1417

1.2293

11.2733

0.0000
8,653.208
5 8,653.208
5 1.9480

0.5897
8,846.601
6 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 3 of 29 ends

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 4 of 29 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Energy

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mobile

7.5210

14.3447

75.4989

0.1715

18.3338

0.1561

18.4899

4.8951

0.1466

5.0417
17,503.90
68 17,503.90
68 1.0091

1.0500
17,842.03
64 Total

32.6122

17.7469

78.4558

0.1919

18.3338

0.4149

18.7487

4.8951

0.4055

5.3005
21,585.63
37 21,585.63
37 1.0879

1.1248
21,948.03
15 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Energy

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mobile

7.5210

14.3447

75.4989

0.1715

18.3338

0.1561

18.4899

4.8951

0.1466

5.0417
17,503.90
68 17,503.90
68 1.0091

1.0500
17,842.03
64 Total

32.6122

17.7469

78.4558

0.1919

18.3338

0.4149

18.7487

4.8951

0.4055

5.3005
21,585.63
37 21,585.63
37 1.0879

1.1248
21,948.03
15 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 5 of 29 ends

0.29 Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

Page 6 of 29 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 412.00
161.00

0.00 10.80

7.30 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 82.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 7 of 29 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.8922
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Total

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0448

0.0305

0.3405

9.8000e-
004

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332

98.9433

3.2100e-
003

3.0600e-
003

99.9359
Total

0.0448

0.0305

0.3405

9.8000e-
004

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332

98.9433

3.2100e-
003

3.0600e-
003

99.9359
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 8 of 29 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000
3,747.422
8 3,747.422
8 1.0485
3,773.634
5 Total

2.2437

20.8781

19.7073

0.0388

0.9602

0.8922

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0448

0.0305

0.3405

9.8000e-
004

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332

98.9433

3.2100e-
003

3.0600e-
003

99.9359
Total

0.0448

0.0305

0.3405

9.8000e-
004

0.1232

6.0000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.5000e-
004

0.0332

98.9433

3.2100e-
003

3.0600e-
003

99.9359
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 9 of 29 ends

19.6570

0.0000

19.6570

10.1025

0.0000

10.1025

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

1.2294

1.1310

1.1310
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Total

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

19.6570

1.2294

20.8864

10.1025

1.1310

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0538

0.0366

0.4086

1.1700e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
118.7319
118.7319

3.8500e-
003

3.6700e-
003
119.9230
Total

0.0538

0.0366

0.4086

1.1700e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
118.7319
118.7319

3.8500e-
003

3.6700e-
003
119.9230
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 10 of 29 ends

19.6570

0.0000

19.6570

10.1025

0.0000

10.1025

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

1.2294

1.1310

0.0000
3,688.010
0 3,688.010
0 1.1928
3,717.829
4 Total

2.6609

27.1760

18.3356

0.0381

19.6570

1.2294

20.8864

10.1025

1.1310

11.2335

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0538

0.0366

0.4086

1.1700e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
118.7319
118.7319

3.8500e-
003

3.6700e-
003
119.9230
Total

0.0538

0.0366

0.4086

1.1700e-
003

0.1479

7.2000e-
004

0.1486

0.0392

6.6000e-
004

0.0399
118.7319
118.7319

3.8500e-
003

3.6700e-
003
119.9230
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 11 of 29 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

9.2036

0.0000

9.2036

3.6538

0.0000

3.6538

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

1.3354

1.2286

1.2286
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Total

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

9.2036

1.3354

10.5390

3.6538

1.2286

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0597

0.0407

0.4540

1.3100e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
131.9244
131.9244

4.2800e-
003

4.0800e-
003
133.2478
Total

0.0597

0.0407

0.4540

1.3100e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
131.9244
131.9244

4.2800e-
003

4.0800e-
003
133.2478
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 12 of 29 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

9.2036

0.0000

9.2036

3.6538

0.0000

3.6538

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

1.3354

1.2286

0.0000
6,009.748
7 6,009.748
7 1.9437
6,058.340
5 Total

3.2181

32.3770

27.7228

0.0621

9.2036

1.3354

10.5390

3.6538

1.2286

4.8823

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0597

0.0407

0.4540

1.3100e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
131.9244
131.9244

4.2800e-
003

4.0800e-
003
133.2478
Total

0.0597

0.0407

0.4540

1.3100e-
003

0.1643

8.0000e-
004

0.1651

0.0436

7.4000e-
004

0.0443
131.9244
131.9244

4.2800e-
003

4.0800e-
003
133.2478
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 13 of 29 ends

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.5769
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Total

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1678

7.2947

2.1673

0.0320

1.0916

0.0465

1.1380

0.3143

0.0445

0.3588
3,379.867
5 3,379.867
5 0.0137

0.5056
3,530.888
7 Worker

1.2304

0.8377

9.3514

0.0269

3.3845

0.0165

3.4010

0.8977

0.0152

0.9129
2,717.642
1 2,717.642
1 0.0882

0.0841
2,744.905
2 Total

1.3982

8.1324

11.5187

0.0589

4.4760

0.0630

4.5390

1.2120

0.0596

1.2717
6,097.509
6 6,097.509
6 0.1019

0.5897
6,275.793
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 14 of 29 ends

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000
2,555.698
9 2,555.698
9 0.6044
2,570.807
7 Total

1.4716

13.4438

16.1668

0.0270

0.6133

0.5769

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1678

7.2947

2.1673

0.0320

1.0916

0.0465

1.1380

0.3143

0.0445

0.3588
3,379.867
5 3,379.867
5 0.0137

0.5056
3,530.888
7 Worker

1.2304

0.8377

9.3514

0.0269

3.3845

0.0165

3.4010

0.8977

0.0152

0.9129
2,717.642
1 2,717.642
1 0.0882

0.0841
2,744.905
2 Total

1.3982

8.1324

11.5187

0.0589

4.4760

0.0630

4.5390

1.2120

0.0596

1.2717
6,097.509
6 6,097.509
6 0.1019

0.5897
6,275.793
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 15 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1637

7.2695

2.1225

0.0314

1.0916

0.0465

1.1380

0.3143

0.0444

0.3588
3,318.348
5 3,318.348
5 0.0131

0.4960
3,466.483
7 Worker

1.1410

0.7436

8.6763

0.0260

3.3845

0.0157

3.4001

0.8977

0.0144

0.9121
2,625.899
3 2,625.899
3 0.0796

0.0781
2,651.166
2 Total

1.3047

8.0130

10.7988

0.0574

4.4760

0.0621

4.5381

1.2121

0.0588

1.2709
5,944.247
8 5,944.247
8 0.0927

0.5741
6,117.649
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 16 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1637

7.2695

2.1225

0.0314

1.0916

0.0465

1.1380

0.3143

0.0444

0.3588
3,318.348
5 3,318.348
5 0.0131

0.4960
3,466.483
7 Worker

1.1410

0.7436

8.6763

0.0260

3.3845

0.0157

3.4001

0.8977

0.0144

0.9121
2,625.899
3 2,625.899
3 0.0796

0.0781
2,651.166
2 Total

1.3047

8.0130

10.7988

0.0574

4.4760

0.0621

4.5381

1.2121

0.0588

1.2709
5,944.247
8 5,944.247
8 0.0927

0.5741
6,117.649
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 17 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.4963
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1601

7.2297

2.0858

0.0308

1.0916

0.0462

1.1378

0.3143

0.0442

0.3585
3,255.984
1 3,255.984
1 0.0127

0.4862
3,401.189
6 Worker

1.0647

0.6671

8.1499

0.0252

3.3845

0.0149

3.3994

0.8977

0.0138

0.9115
2,545.619
0 2,545.619
0 0.0723

0.0732
2,569.249
0 Total

1.2247

7.8968

10.2356

0.0560

4.4760

0.0612

4.5372

1.2121

0.0580

1.2700
5,801.603
1 5,801.603
1 0.0850

0.5594
5,970.438
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 18 of 29 ends

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000
2,556.474
4 2,556.474
4 0.6010
2,571.498
1 Total

1.3674

12.4697

16.0847

0.0270

0.5276

0.4963

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1601

7.2297

2.0858

0.0308

1.0916

0.0462

1.1378

0.3143

0.0442

0.3585
3,255.984
1 3,255.984
1 0.0127

0.4862
3,401.189
6 Worker

1.0647

0.6671

8.1499

0.0252

3.3845

0.0149

3.3994

0.8977

0.0138

0.9115
2,545.619
0 2,545.619
0 0.0723

0.0732
2,569.249
0 Total

1.2247

7.8968

10.2356

0.0560

4.4760

0.0612

4.5372

1.2121

0.0580

1.2700
5,801.603
1 5,801.603
1 0.0850

0.5594
5,970.438
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 19 of 29 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.3850
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0388

0.0243

0.2967

9.2000e-
004

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332

92.6803

2.6300e-
003

2.6700e-
003

93.5406
Total

0.0388

0.0243

0.2967

9.2000e-
004

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332

92.6803

2.6300e-
003

2.6700e-
003

93.5406
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 20 of 29 ends

3.6 Paving - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000
2,206.745
2 2,206.745
2 0.7137
2,224.587
8 Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.9152

8.5816

14.5780

0.0228

0.4185

0.3850

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0388

0.0243

0.2967

9.2000e-
004

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332

92.6803

2.6300e-
003

2.6700e-
003

93.5406
Total

0.0388

0.0243

0.2967

9.2000e-
004

0.1232

5.4000e-
004

0.1238

0.0327

5.0000e-
004

0.0332

92.6803

2.6300e-
003

2.6700e-
003

93.5406
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 21 of 29 ends

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total
681.5854

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.2119

0.1328

1.6221

5.0100e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
506.6523
506.6523

0.0144

0.0146
511.3554
Total

0.2119

0.1328

1.6221

5.0100e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
506.6523
506.6523

0.0144

0.0146
511.3554
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 22 of 29 ends

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total
681.5854

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.2119

0.1328

1.6221

5.0100e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
506.6523
506.6523

0.0144

0.0146
511.3554
Total

0.2119

0.1328

1.6221

5.0100e-
003

0.6736

2.9700e-
003

0.6766

0.1787

2.7400e-
003

0.1814
506.6523
506.6523

0.0144

0.0146
511.3554
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 23 of 29 ends

7.5210

14.3447

75.4989

0.1715

18.3338

0.1561

18.4899

4.8951

0.1466

5.0417
17,503.90
68 17,503.90
68 1.0091

1.0500
17,842.03
64 Unmitigated

7.5210

14.3447

75.4989

0.1715

18.3338

0.1561

18.4899

4.8951

0.1466

5.0417
17,503.90
68 17,503.90
68 1.0091

1.0500
17,842.03
64 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

9.50 7.30

7.30 59.00

28.00 13.00
79 19
2 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Industrial Park

0.522587

0.052580

0.171418

0.151108

0.026705

0.007202

0.013509

0.026273

0.000644

0.000311

0.023009

0.001408

0.003247
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 24 of 29 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Total

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 25 of 29 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Unmitigated

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285

34.6929

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Total

0.3741

3.4013

2.8571

0.0204

0.2585

0.2585
4,081.512
3 4,081.512
3 0.0782

0.0748
4,105.766
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 26 of 29 ends

3.7338

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

20.9741

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

9.1900e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Total

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 27 of 29 ends

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

3.7338

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

20.9741

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

9.1900e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Total

24.7171

9.0000e-
004

0.0998

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.2145

5.6000e-
004

0.2285
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/7/2024 3:32 PM

Page 28 of 29 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

Page 29 of 29 ends

Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0698 Total DPM (lbs) 237.9287671 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0705 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.382465753 Total DPM (g) 107924.4888 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.38630137 Construction Duration (days) 239 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.001881214 Total DPM (lbs) 141 Total DPM (lbs) 91.40931507 Release Height (meters) 3 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.002028082 Total DPM (g) 41463.26532 Total Acreage 75 Release Height (meters) 3 Start Date 5/7/2024 Max Horizontal (meters) 779.12 Total Acreage 75 End Date 1/1/2025 Min Horizontal (meters) 389.56 Max Horizontal (meters) 779.12 Construction Days 239 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Min Horizontal (meters) 389.56 Setting Visalia Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0724 Population 143,966 Setting Visalia Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.396712329 Start Date 5/7/2024 Population 143,966 Construction Duration (days) 365 End Date 3/2/2026
Total DPM (lbs) 144.8 Total Construction Days 664
Total DPM (g) 65681.28 Total Years of Construction 1.82 Start Date 1/1/2025 Total Years of Operation 28.18
End Date 1/1/2026
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.00523
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.028657534
Construction Duration (days) 60
Total DPM (lbs) 1.719452055
Total DPM (g) 779.9434521
Start Date 1/1/2026
End Date 3/2/2026
Construction Days 60
2026
Construction Operation
2024 Total Emission Rate
2025
Attachment B
AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 05/08/24
14:10:53
TITLE: ShirtandRiggin, Construction
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.188E-02 g/s 0.149E-01 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.620E-08 g/(s-m2) 0.492E-07 lb/(hr-m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 779.12 meters 2556.17 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 389.56 meters 1278.08 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN
POPULATION: 143966
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POINT SOURCES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE 1-HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL
SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD
-----------------------------------------------------
1* 1.000 0.3787 15 400.0 WIN
* = worst case diagonal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment C
********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON: Winter
ALBEDO: 0.35
BOWEN RATIO: 1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT -------------------------------------------------------------

YR MO DY JDY HR
-- -- -- --- --
10 01 10 10 01
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50

HT REF TA HT
- - - - - - - - - - -

10.0 310.0 2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **********************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC
(m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3)
--------------------- ---------------------

1.00 0.2922 2525.00 0.3615E-01

25.00 0.2992 2550.00 0.3570E-01

50.00 0.3063 2575.00 0.3525E-01

75.00 0.3130 2600.00 0.3482E-01 100.00 0.3195 2625.00 0.3439E-01 125.00 0.3257 2650.00 0.3398E-01 150.00 0.3317 2675.00 0.3357E-01 175.00 0.3374 2700.00 0.3318E-01 200.00 0.3426 2725.00 0.3279E-01 225.00 0.3479 2750.00 0.3241E-01 250.00 0.3531 2775.00 0.3204E-01 275.00 0.3581 2800.00 0.3167E-01 300.00 0.3629 2825.00 0.3132E-01 325.00 0.3676 2850.00 0.3097E-01 350.00 0.3721 2875.00 0.3062E-01 375.00 0.3764 2900.00 0.3028E-01 400.00 0.3787 2925.00 0.2995E-01 425.00 0.3770 2950.00 0.2962E-01 450.00 0.3199 2975.00 0.2930E-01 475.00 0.2706 3000.00 0.2898E-01 500.00 0.2428 3025.00 0.2867E-01 525.00 0.2244 3050.00 0.2837E-01 550.00 0.2106 3075.00 0.2807E-01 575.00 0.1986 3100.00 0.2778E-01 600.00 0.1891 3125.00 0.2749E-01 625.00 0.1798 3150.00 0.2720E-01 650.00 0.1715 3175.00 0.2693E-01 675.00 0.1647 3200.00 0.2665E-01 700.00 0.1588 3225.00 0.2638E-01 725.00 0.1533 3250.00 0.2612E-01 750.00 0.1482 3275.00 0.2586E-01 775.00 0.1433 3300.00 0.2561E-01 800.00 0.1387 3325.00 0.2536E-01 825.00 0.1344 3350.00 0.2511E-01 850.00 0.1303 3375.00 0.2487E-01 875.00 0.1264 3400.00 0.2463E-01 900.00 0.1227 3425.00 0.2440E-01 925.00 0.1191 3450.00 0.2417E-01 950.00 0.1158 3475.00 0.2395E-01 975.00 0.1126 3500.00 0.2373E-01 1000.00 0.1096 3525.00 0.2351E-01 1025.00 0.1066 3550.00 0.2329E-01 1050.00 0.1038 3575.00 0.2307E-01 1075.00 0.1012 3600.00 0.2286E-01 1100.00 0.9862E-01 3625.00 0.2266E-01 1125.00 0.9618E-01 3650.00 0.2245E-01 1150.00 0.9382E-01 3675.00 0.2225E-01 1175.00 0.9156E-01 3700.00 0.2206E-01 1200.00 0.8941E-01 3725.00 0.2186E-01 1225.00 0.8730E-01 3750.00 0.2167E-01 1250.00 0.8529E-01 3775.00 0.2148E-01 1275.00 0.8337E-01 3800.00 0.2130E-01 1300.00 0.8154E-01 3825.00 0.2111E-01 1325.00 0.7976E-01 3850.00 0.2094E-01 1350.00 0.7803E-01 3875.00 0.2076E-01 1375.00 0.7636E-01 3900.00 0.2058E-01 1400.00 0.7476E-01 3925.00 0.2041E-01 1425.00 0.7322E-01 3950.00 0.2024E-01 1450.00 0.7173E-01 3975.00 0.2008E-01 1475.00 0.7028E-01 4000.00 0.1991E-01 1500.00 0.6888E-01 4025.00 0.1975E-01 1525.00 0.6753E-01 4050.00 0.1959E-01 1550.00 0.6624E-01 4075.00 0.1943E-01 1575.00 0.6499E-01 4100.00 0.1928E-01 1600.00 0.6379E-01 4125.00 0.1912E-01 1625.00 0.6260E-01 4150.00 0.1897E-01 1650.00 0.6144E-01 4175.00 0.1882E-01 1675.00 0.6031E-01 4200.00 0.1867E-01 1700.00 0.5923E-01 4225.00 0.1853E-01 1725.00 0.5819E-01 4250.00 0.1838E-01 1750.00 0.5718E-01 4275.00 0.1824E-01 1775.00 0.5620E-01 4300.00 0.1810E-01 1800.00 0.5525E-01 4325.00 0.1797E-01 1825.00 0.5432E-01 4350.00 0.1783E-01 1850.00 0.5341E-01 4375.00 0.1770E-01 1875.00 0.5253E-01 4400.00 0.1756E-01 1900.00 0.5168E-01 4425.00 0.1743E-01 1925.00 0.5086E-01 4450.00 0.1730E-01 1950.00 0.5006E-01 4475.00 0.1718E-01 1975.00 0.4927E-01 4500.00 0.1705E-01 2000.00 0.4850E-01 4525.00 0.1693E-01 2025.00 0.4776E-01 4550.00 0.1680E-01 2050.00 0.4704E-01 4575.00 0.1668E-01 2075.00 0.4633E-01 4600.00 0.1656E-01 2100.00 0.4564E-01 4625.00 0.1644E-01 2125.00 0.4496E-01 4650.00 0.1632E-01 2150.00 0.4430E-01 4675.00 0.1621E-01 2175.00 0.4366E-01 4700.00 0.1609E-01 2200.00 0.4303E-01 4725.00 0.1598E-01 2225.00 0.4243E-01 4750.00 0.1587E-01 2250.00 0.4184E-01 4775.00 0.1576E-01 2275.00 0.4126E-01 4800.00 0.1565E-01 2300.00 0.4070E-01 4825.00 0.1554E-01 2325.00 0.4015E-01 4850.00 0.1543E-01 2350.00 0.3962E-01 4875.00 0.1533E-01 2375.00 0.3910E-01 4900.00 0.1522E-01 2400.00 0.3859E-01 4925.00 0.1512E-01 2425.00 0.3808E-01 4950.00 0.1502E-01 2450.00 0.3758E-01 4975.00 0.1492E-01 2475.00 0.3709E-01 5000.00 0.1482E-01 2500.00 0.3662E-01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in

SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA-454/R-92-019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL

CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- FLAT TERRAIN 0.3792 0.3792 0.3792 0.3792 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 403.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.2922 0.2922 0.2922 0.2922 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 05/08/24 14:14:18
TITLE: ShirkandRigginAnnexation, Operational
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.203E-02 g/s 0.161E-01 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.668E-08 g/(s-m2) 0.530E-07 lb/(hr-m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 779.12 meters 2556.17 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 389.56 meters 1278.08 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN
POPULATION: 143966
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE 1-HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL
SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD
-----------------------------------------------------
1* 1.000 0.4083 15 400.0 WIN
* = worst case diagonal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON: Winter
ALBEDO: 0.35
BOWEN RATIO: 1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT -------------------------------------------------------------

HT REF TA HT
- - - - - - - - - - -

10.0 310.0 2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **********************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC
(m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3)
--------------------- ---------------------

1.00 0.3150 2525.00 0.3897E-01

25.00 0.3226 2550.00 0.3848E-01

50.00 0.3302 2575.00 0.3800E-01

75.00 0.3375 2600.00 0.3754E-01 100.00 0.3445 2625.00 0.3708E-01 125.00 0.3512 2650.00 0.3663E-01 150.00 0.3576 2675.00 0.3620E-01 175.00 0.3638 2700.00 0.3577E-01 200.00 0.3693 2725.00 0.3535E-01 225.00 0.3751 2750.00 0.3494E-01 250.00 0.3807 2775.00 0.3454E-01 275.00 0.3861 2800.00 0.3415E-01 300.00 0.3913 2825.00 0.3376E-01 325.00 0.3963 2850.00 0.3339E-01 350.00 0.4011 2875.00 0.3301E-01 375.00 0.4058 2900.00 0.3265E-01 400.00 0.4083 2925.00 0.3229E-01 425.00 0.4064 2950.00 0.3193E-01 450.00 0.3449 2975.00 0.3159E-01 475.00 0.2917 3000.00 0.3125E-01 500.00 0.2617 3025.00 0.3091E-01 525.00 0.2420 3050.00 0.3059E-01 550.00 0.2270 3075.00 0.3026E-01 575.00 0.2141 3100.00 0.2995E-01 600.00 0.2038 3125.00 0.2963E-01 625.00 0.1939 3150.00 0.2933E-01 650.00 0.1849 3175.00 0.2903E-01 675.00 0.1776 3200.00 0.2873E-01 700.00 0.1712 3225.00 0.2844E-01 725.00 0.1653 3250.00 0.2816E-01 750.00 0.1597 3275.00 0.2788E-01 775.00 0.1545 3300.00 0.2761E-01 800.00 0.1495 3325.00 0.2734E-01 825.00 0.1449 3350.00 0.2707E-01 850.00 0.1405 3375.00 0.2681E-01 875.00 0.1363 3400.00 0.2656E-01 900.00 0.1323 3425.00 0.2631E-01 925.00 0.1284 3450.00 0.2606E-01 950.00 0.1248 3475.00 0.2582E-01 975.00 0.1214 3500.00 0.2558E-01 1000.00 0.1181 3525.00 0.2534E-01 1025.00 0.1150 3550.00 0.2511E-01 1050.00 0.1119 3575.00 0.2488E-01 1075.00 0.1091 3600.00 0.2465E-01 1100.00 0.1063 3625.00 0.2443E-01 1125.00 0.1037 3650.00 0.2421E-01 1150.00 0.1011 3675.00 0.2399E-01 1175.00 0.9871E-01 3700.00 0.2378E-01 1200.00 0.9639E-01 3725.00 0.2357E-01 1225.00 0.9412E-01 3750.00 0.2336E-01 1250.00 0.9195E-01 3775.00 0.2316E-01 1275.00 0.8988E-01 3800.00 0.2296E-01 1300.00 0.8791E-01 3825.00 0.2276E-01 1325.00 0.8599E-01 3850.00 0.2257E-01 1350.00 0.8413E-01 3875.00 0.2238E-01 1375.00 0.8233E-01 3900.00 0.2219E-01 1400.00 0.8060E-01 3925.00 0.2201E-01 1425.00 0.7894E-01 3950.00 0.2182E-01 1450.00 0.7734E-01 3975.00 0.2165E-01 1475.00 0.7576E-01 4000.00 0.2147E-01 1500.00 0.7425E-01 4025.00 0.2129E-01 1525.00 0.7280E-01 4050.00 0.2112E-01 1550.00 0.7141E-01 4075.00 0.2095E-01 1575.00 0.7006E-01 4100.00 0.2078E-01 1600.00 0.6877E-01 4125.00 0.2062E-01 1625.00 0.6749E-01 4150.00 0.2045E-01 1650.00 0.6623E-01 4175.00 0.2029E-01 1675.00 0.6502E-01 4200.00 0.2013E-01 1700.00 0.6386E-01 4225.00 0.1997E-01 1725.00 0.6273E-01 4250.00 0.1982E-01 1750.00 0.6164E-01 4275.00 0.1967E-01 1775.00 0.6059E-01 4300.00 0.1952E-01 1800.00 0.5957E-01 4325.00 0.1937E-01 1825.00 0.5856E-01 4350.00 0.1922E-01 1850.00 0.5759E-01 4375.00 0.1908E-01 1875.00 0.5664E-01 4400.00 0.1894E-01 1900.00 0.5572E-01 4425.00 0.1879E-01 1925.00 0.5483E-01 4450.00 0.1866E-01 1950.00 0.5396E-01 4475.00 0.1852E-01 1975.00 0.5312E-01 4500.00 0.1838E-01 2000.00 0.5229E-01 4525.00 0.1825E-01 2025.00 0.5149E-01 4550.00 0.1811E-01 2050.00 0.5071E-01 4575.00 0.1798E-01 2075.00 0.4995E-01 4600.00 0.1785E-01 2100.00 0.4920E-01 4625.00 0.1772E-01 2125.00 0.4847E-01 4650.00 0.1760E-01 2150.00 0.4776E-01 4675.00 0.1747E-01 2175.00 0.4707E-01 4700.00 0.1735E-01 2200.00 0.4639E-01 4725.00 0.1723E-01 2225.00 0.4574E-01 4750.00 0.1711E-01 2250.00 0.4510E-01 4775.00 0.1699E-01 2275.00 0.4448E-01 4800.00 0.1687E-01 2300.00 0.4388E-01 4825.00 0.1675E-01 2325.00 0.4329E-01 4850.00 0.1664E-01 2350.00 0.4271E-01 4875.00 0.1653E-01 2375.00 0.4215E-01 4900.00 0.1641E-01 2400.00 0.4160E-01 4925.00 0.1630E-01 2425.00 0.4105E-01 4950.00 0.1619E-01 2450.00 0.4051E-01 4975.00 0.1609E-01 2475.00 0.3999E-01 5000.00 0.1598E-01 2500.00 0.3947E-01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL

CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- FLAT TERRAIN 0.4089 0.4089 0.4089 0.4089 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 403.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.3150 0.3150 0.3150 0.3150 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C
.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Char
acterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment D
2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for l arge solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern C alifornia drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of r eleases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations t hroughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by t he former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of M TBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of p erchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water tr eatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against p rovisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in C alifornia and New York.
3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that m et strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and r egulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring net works, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at milit ary bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development thr ough work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Te chnical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of d rinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation u nder the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to d etermine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of M edford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental ge ology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M. F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment E

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022

Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist

Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48

Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342

Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12 October 2022

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993

Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022

In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022

In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022

In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022

In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022

In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022

In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022

In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022

In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022

In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022

In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022

In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022

In the Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022

In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022

In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021

In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021

In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021

In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020

In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019

In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018

In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017

In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017

In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020

In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018

In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022

In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015

In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015

In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015

In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015

In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014

In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012

In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011

In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010

In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009

Visalia City CouncilMay 20, 2024

Visalia City Council
May 20, 2024