Visalia City Council
December 3, 2024

Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
Visalia City Council
Visalia City Council
Meeting Agenda - Final
Tuesday, December 3, 2024 7:00 PM City Council Chambers Special Meeting

ROLL CALL
CALL TO ORDER WORK SESSION - 5:00 PM (Unless otherwise noted)

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Citizens are now invited to comment on issues within the jurisdiction of the Visalia City Council and items listed on the Closed Session agenda. The Council asks that you keep your comments concise and positive. Creative criticism, presented with appropriate courtesy, is welcome. Each speaker will be allowed three minutes, and a timer will notify you when your time is expired. Please begin your comments by stating and spelling your name and providing your city of residence.

WORK SESSION AND ACTION ITEMS (as described)

1. New Employee Introductions
Administration:

Rachel Dangerfield, Administrative Assistant
Police:

Jeff Dowling, Police Agent
Kyle Kalender, Police Agent
Alexia Gonzalez, Police Officer
Paulino Manzano, Police Officer
Anessa Mora, Police Officer
Erik Osuna, Police Officer
Juan Pinedo, Police Officer
Trevor Smythe, Police Officer
24-0470

2. Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) 5-year Plan:

Develop FY 2025/26 - 2029/30 plan and amend FY 2024/25. 24-0513

3. Consolidated Plan Development. Receive an update and provide direction on development of the City’s next 5-year Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) for the use of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), and HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds.
24-0454

1 Visalia City Council Meeting Agenda - Final December 3, 2024 CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INVOCATION

SPECIAL PRESENTATION / RECOGNITION

PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time for people to comment on matters within the jurisdiction of the Visalia City Council. The Council asks that you keep your comments brief and positive. Creative criticism, presented with appropriate courtesy, is welcome.

This is the opportunity to address the Council on any matter of interest, whether on the agenda or not, other than the Consent Calendar.

People may comment one time during the evening for up to three minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Council. Each speaker will be allowed three minutes, and a timer will notify you when your time is expired. Please begin your comments by stating and spelling your name and providing your city of residence.

ITEMS OF INTEREST

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made by a City Council Member and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion

1. Authorization to read ordinances by title only. 24-0360

2. 2023/24 AB 1600 Report - Request for City Council to receive, review, and file the 2023/24 Impact Fee Report as required by State Law.
24-0494

3. Execution of Utility Joint Use Agreement: Authorize the City Manager to finalize the two (2) draft Southern California Edison Joint Use Agreement’s, then execute the two (2) finalized agreements and adopt Resolution 2024-66 for the Riggin Widening Project Kelsey St. to Shirk St. and Resolution 2024-67 for The Carlton Acres Commercial Project at the northeast corner of said intersection. (Resolutions required)
24-0499

4. Request Authorization to File Notice of Completion: Authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion for FY 22-23 Measure N Street Rehab - County Center St. from Houston Ave. to Riggin Ave.

Project.
24-0503

2 Visalia City Council Meeting Agenda - Final December 3, 2024

5. Consider appointment to the Parks and Recreation
Commission: Appointment of Isaiah Farias, as recommended by the City Council sub-committee.
24-0521

REGULAR ITEMS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
Comments related to regular Items and Public Hearing Items are limited to three minutes per speaker, for a maximum of 30 minutes per item. The Mayor may reasonably limit or extend the public comment period to preserve the Council's interest in conducting efficient, orderly meetings.

1. A Public Hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-17: A request by Derek Finnegan / Lars Anderson & Associates to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-31 for the establishment of a 172,000 square foot commercial building for the sale of general retail merchandise with a fuel dispensing service station and a car wash, within the Commons at Visalia Parkway Shopping Center, located in the C-R (Regional Commercial) Zone. The project site is located on the southwest corner of South Mooney Boulevard and West Visalia Parkway (APNs: 121-620-004, 005, 006, 007, 008, 013, 014).
24-0514

ADJOURNMENT

UPCOMING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

1. Upcoming City Council Meetings
Wednesday, December 11, 2024 @ 5:30 p.m. at 707 W. Acequia Monday, December 16, 2024 @ 7:00 p.m. at 707 W. Acequia Note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change, check posted agenda for correct details. In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in meetings contact 713-4512.

Written materials relating to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda are available for public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk, 220 N. Santa Fe Street, Visalia CA 93292, during normal business hours.
24-0241

3 Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 24-0470 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 1.

Agenda Item Wording:

New Employee Introductions
Administration:

Rachel Dangerfield, Administrative Assistant
Police:

Jeff Dowling, Police Agent
Kyle Kalender, Police Agent
Alexia Gonzalez, Police Officer
Paulino Manzano, Police Officer
Anessa Mora, Police Officer
Erik Osuna, Police Officer
Juan Pinedo, Police Officer
Trevor Smythe, Police Officer
Visalia City Council Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/27/2024
powered by Legistar™ 4
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 24-0513 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 2.

Agenda Item Wording:

Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) 5-year Plan: Develop FY 2025/26 - 2029/30 plan and amend FY 2024/25.

Deadline for Action: 12/3/2024
Submitting Department: Finance and Technology Services
Contact Name and Phone Number: Margie Perez, Housing Specialist, (559) 713-4460; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Melody Murch, Assistant Finance Director, (559) 713-4379; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Renee Nagel, Finance Director, (559) 713-4375; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Department Recommendation:

1. Direct staff to prepare a draft 5-year PLHA plan based on Council recommendations tonight.

2. Direct staff to publish the draft 5-year plan for public input and bring back for a public hearing and possible changes before adoption (resolution required).

3. Direct staff to prepare a FY 2024/25 PLHA amendment to include 40% to an Affordable Owner -Occupied Workforce Housing (AOWH) activity.

Background Discussion:

The Permanent Local Housing Allocation Plan (PLHA) was created by State housing legislation that passed in 2017 to address the shortage of affordable housing in California. In 2017, Governor Brown signed a 15-bill housing package <https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy-and-research/plans-and-reports> aimed at addressing the state’s housing shortage and high housing costs. Specifically, it included the Building Homes and Jobs Act <https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml? bill_id=201720180SB2>(SB 2, 2017), which established a $75 recording fee on real estate documents to increase the supply of affordable homes in California. The revenue from SB 2 will vary from year to year, as revenue is dependent on real estate transactions with fluctuating activity. The legislation directs the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to use 70% of the revenue collected, beginning in calendar year 2019, to provide financial assistance to local governments for eligible housing-related projects and programs to assist in addressing the unmet housing needs of their local communities. This program is hereafter referred to as the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program.

Eligible applicants for the entitlement PLHA formula component are metropolitan cities and urban counties allocated a grant pursuant to the federal CDBG formula that are housing element compliant.

Thus, the City of Visalia is an eligible applicant. Annually, the City has to apply for PLHA funds from HCD. Total PLHA funds are estimated at approximately $2.1 million over the next 5 years as shown below in Table 1: FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 PLHA Estimated Funding. However, this is based on projected real estate transactions and this number will most likely change. Any unrequested PLHA Visalia City Council Page 1 of 5 Printed on 11/27/2024
powered by Legistar™ 5
File #: 24-0513 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 2.
funds will revert to HCD’S Multifamily Housing Program (MHP).

Eligible PLHA Activities: Eligible PLHA activities are listed below. A complete detailed list of eligible PLHA activities is found on Attachment “A” PLHA Guidelines. 1) The development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordable rental housing. 2) The development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of ownership housing, including Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) for workforce households earning up to 120 percent of AMI. 3) Matching funds placed into Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund. 4) Matching funds available through the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund. 5) Capitalized reserves for services connected to the preservation and creation of new permanent supportive housing.
6) Assisting persons who are experiencing or at risk of homelessness, via rapid rehousing, rental assistance, case management, operating and capital costs for navigation centers/emergency shelters, and new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permanent/transitional housing.
7) ADA modifications in lower-income owner-occupied housing. 8) Acquisition and rehabilitation of foreclosed or vacant homes and apartments. 9) Homeownership assistance.

PLHA Funding Requirement - Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing (AOWH):

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50470(b)(2)(A), twenty percent (20%) of the moneys collected and deposited in the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund shall be expended for Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing (AOWH). HCD monitors compliance with this requirement both based on allocations adopted in required 5-year plans and any amendments to that plan as well as actual expenditures. Based on these indicators, HCD has determined that at the end of the current 5- year period funds projected to be expended on AOWH are trailing behind the required 20%.

Therefore, HCD is requiring all jurisdictions that have not had an AOWH activity to include a minimum of 40% to an eligible AOWH activity beginning in FY 2024/25 and in the next 5-year PLHA plan. The City of Visalia has not had an AOWH PLHA funded activity which means the City will have to meet the 40% requirement starting in this fiscal year.

Eligible AOHW Activities:

The following PHLA activities directly related to ownership housing for household up to 120% of the area median income (AMI), which for a family of four is $105,500. · The development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of ownership housing. · Matching portions of funds placed into a Housing Trust Fund. · Matching portions of funds available through the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund.
· ADA modifications in lower-income owner-occupied housing.

Visalia City Council Page 2 of 5 Printed on 11/27/2024
powered by Legistar™ 6
File #: 24-0513 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 2.
· Acquisition and rehabilitation of foreclosed or vacant homes and apartments. · Homeownership assistance.

PLHA Community Needs Assessment:

The City conducted an online PLHA survey from October 17, 2024, through November 4, 2024, in English and Spanish. 91 individuals completed the PLHA 5-year survey. 75% of individuals lived in the City of Visalia and 30% worked or owned a business in the City of Visalia. 62% of those survey stated the target population in Visalia most in need of housing resources are those experiencing homelessness and at-risk of homelessness. Those survey felt the most needed housing options are Affordable Rental Housing, Rental Assistance, Emergency Shelter, Permanent Supportive Housing, Transitional Housing, and Homeownership Assistance. The full PLHA survey results are included in Attachment D: FY 25/26 - FY 29/30 PLHA Survey Results.

City Staff Recommendation for PLHA Funding:

PLHA allows up to 5% for administration and is requiring a minimum of 40% to a AOWH homeownership activity allowing the remaining 55% for other PLHA activities. Staff is recommending utilizing remaining PLHA funding to assist persons experiencing homelessness or at-risk of homelessness. Based on the Community Needs Assessment staff is proposing to include development and operation of an extended overnight Emergency Shelter, Warming Center operational, the Visalia Navigation Center operational, and Eden House operational funding as shown below in Table 2: FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 PLHA Proposed Activities. The table below is based on the FY 2024/25 PLHA allocation. Annual PLHA funding is expected to fluctuate each year; therefore, HCD encourages establishing activity percentages that will be increased or decreased annually based actual annual allocations according to the approved 5-year PLHA plan percentages.

Any unspent annual Warming Center funds will be directed to the development and/or operation of an overnight Emergency Shelter. Staff will continue to research if an extended overnight emergency shelter is financially feasible through leveraging other potential funding including additional federal, state, and local funding sources.

PLHA Amendments: Any amendment exceeding 10% of the funds allocated in the plan triggers an amendment to the 5-Year plan and will require approval by City Council and a public hearing. Under PLHA rules, funds must be committed by resolution before subsequent year funding can be requested.

Visalia City Council Page 3 of 5 Printed on 11/27/2024
powered by Legistar™ 7
File #: 24-0513 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 2.

Recommended FY 2024/25 PLHA Amendment:

As mentioned above, HCD is requiring all jurisdictions that have not had an AOWH activity to include a minimum of 40% to an eligible AOWH activity beginning in FY 2024/25. This change is requiring an amendment to the City’s FY 2024/25 PLHA Plan. FY 2024/25 PLHA plans submitted without a 40% AOWH activity will be rejected by HCD and will result in the loss of the FY 2024/25 PLHA allocation.

This loss would impact approved PLHA activities which include the Visalia Navigation Center, Eden House, and the Warming Center.

In addition, on October 15, 2024, HCD released the FY 2024/25 PLHA allocations (Attachment B: FY 2024/25 PLHA Allocation), which is $414,499 for the City of Visalia. The allocation is $216,316 less than expected which was based on the first-year (FY 2020/21) PLHA allocation. Due to the reduction in the PLHA allocation and to satisfy the 40% AOWH homeownership activity, staff proposes reducing each approved PLHA activity evenly based off their original percentage as shown below in Table 3:

FY 2024/25 PLHA Proposed Amendment.

Next Steps: Staff will use the priorities and direction provided by Council tonight to draft the proposed 5-year PLHA Plan, and FY 2024/25 PLHA Amendment which will be brought to Council for review, public hearing/comment, and adoption. The 5-year PLHA plan is due to HCD by July 2025.

The FY 2024/25 PLHA Amendment is due to HCD by February 28, 2025. Staff would like to submit both documents early to allow ample time to answer HCD questions and resubmit if needed.

Fiscal Impact:

Action today will authorize staff to prepare a draft 5-year plan for the use of estimated $2.1 million in PLHA program funding over the next 5-years. The 5-year PLHA plan will control the use of PLHA program funding for the 5-year period of FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30. After approval, the 5-year PLHA plan may only be changed through an Amendment submitted to HCD. In additional action today will authorize staff to prepare the FY 2024/25 PLHA Amendment to include 40% to an AOWH homeownership activity.

Prior Council Action: July 20, 2020 - Council adoption of the current 5-year FY 2020/2021 - FY 2024/2025 Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Plan.

Visalia City Council Page 4 of 5 Printed on 11/27/2024
powered by Legistar™ 8
File #: 24-0513 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 2.

Other: None
Alternatives: None
Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

Council moves to approve:

1. Staff to prepare a draft 5-year PLHA plan based on Council recommendations tonight.

2. Staff to publish the draft 5-year plan for public input and bring back for a public hearing.

3. Staff to prepare a FY 2024/25 PLHA amendment to include 40% to an Affordable OwnerOccupied Workforce Housing activity.

Environmental Assessment Status: N/A
CEQA Review: N/A
Attachments: ● Attachment A - PLHA Guidelines; ● Attachment B - FY 2024/25 PLHA NOFA; ● Attachment C - AOWH Activities; ● Attachment D - FY 25/26 - FY 29/30 PLHA Survey Results; ● Attachment E - Proposed CDBG, HOME, & PLHA 5-Year Funding ● Attachment F - FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 PowerPoint
Visalia City Council Page 5 of 5 Printed on 11/27/2024
powered by Legistar™ 9
Permanent Local Housing Allocation
Final Guidelines
Gavin Newsom, Governor
State of California
Alexis Podesta, Secretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency
Douglas R. McCauley, Acting Director
California Department of Housing and Community Development 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95833
October 2019
10 Department of Housing and Community Development 2 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines The matters set forth herein are regulatory mandates, and are adopted in accordance with the authorities set forth below:

Quasi-legislative regulations … have the dignity of statutes … [and]… delegation of legislative authority includes the power to elaborate the meaning of key statutory terms… Ramirez v. Yosemite Water Co., 20 Cal. 4th 785, 800 (1999) In consultation with stakeholders, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) may adopt Guidelines to implement this Section, including determining allocation methodologies. Any guideline, rule, policy, or standard of general application employed by the Department in implementing this chapter shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Title 2 Government Code, Part 1 of Division 3).

NOTE: Authority Cited: Health and Safety Code Section 50470, subdivision (d).

The Department reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to suspend or amend the provisions of these Guidelines, including, but not limited to, grant award amounts. 11 Department of Housing and Community Development 3 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines

INTRODUCTION
Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2, Atkins) was part of a 15-bill housing package aimed at addressing the state’s housing shortage and high housing costs. Specifically, it establishes a permanent source of funding intended to increase the affordable housing stock in California. The revenue from SB 2 will vary from year to year, as revenue is dependent on real estate transactions with fluctuating activity. The legislation directs the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) to use 70 percent of the revenue collected, beginning in calendar year 2019, to provide financial assistance to local governments for eligible housing-related projects and programs to assist in addressing the unmet housing needs of their local communities. This program is hereafter referred to as the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program.

Guidelines for the PLHA program are organized into five Articles as follows:

Article I. General provisions: This article includes information on the purpose of the Guidelines, program objectives, and definitions used throughout the document.

Article II. Program funding: This article describes allocation formulas and methodologies, and award amounts.

Article III. Formula allocation component: This article describes the requirements for Applicants to apply for funds under the formula allocation of the PLHA program.

Article IV. Competitive allocation component: This article describes requirements and uses for PLHA competitive allocation funds.

Article V. Administration: This article describes administrative functions such as terms, non-performance remedies, and reporting and monitoring requirements. 12 Department of Housing and Community Development 4 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program:
2019 Guidelines
Table of Contents
ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 5
Section 100. Purpose and Scope 5
Section 101. Definitions 5
ARTICLE II. PROGRAM FUNDING 9
Section 200. Allocations 9
Section 201. Award Amounts 10
ARTICLE III. FORMULA ALLOCATION COMPONENT 11
Section 300. Eligible Applicants 11
Section 301. Eligible Activities 12
Section 302. Threshold Requirements 13
Section 303. Application Review 16
Section 304. Deadlines and Funding Requirements 17
ARTICLE IV. COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION COMPONENT 17
Section 400. Eligible Applicants 17
Section 401. Eligible Activities 18
Section 402. Threshold Requirements 18
Section 403. Selection Criteria 20
Section 404. Application Review 22
Section 405. Deadlines and Funding Requirements 23
ARTICLE V. ADMINISTRATION 23
Section 500. Accounting Records 23
Section 501. Audits/Monitoring of Project Files 24
Section 502. Cancellation and Termination 25
Section 503. Reporting 26
13 Department of Housing and Community Development 5 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 100. Purpose and Scope
(a) These Guidelines (hereinafter “Guidelines”) implement, interpret, and make specific Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2, Atkins - hereinafter “SB 2”) as authorized by Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 50470, which created the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund and the PLHA program. The principal goal of this program is to make funding available to eligible local governments in California for housing-related projects and programs that assist in addressing the unmet housing needs of their local communities. Twenty percent of the funding in the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund is required to be expended for Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing, and the program prioritizes investments that increase the supply of housing to households that are at or below 60 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI), adjusted for household size.
(b) These Guidelines establish terms, conditions, and procedures for local governments to submit applications to the Department for funds from the PLHA program’s three components, as listed below:
(1) Entitlement formula component per HSC 50470(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) (2) Non-entitlement formula component per HSC 50470(b)(2)(B)(i)(II) (3) Non-entitlement competitive grant program component per HSC 50470(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) (eligible Applicants are the same as for component 2 above)
(c) The non-entitlement competitive grant program component prioritizes assistance to persons experiencing or At risk of homelessness.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(A), subdivision (b)(2)(B)(i) and subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(I-V).

Section 101. Definitions
All terms not defined below shall, unless their context suggests otherwise, be interpreted in accordance with the meanings of terms described in HSC Section 50470. (a) “Accessory dwelling unit” (ADU) means a dwelling unit which is attached, detached or located within the living area of the existing dwelling or residential dwelling unit and which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons pursuant to Government Code (GC) Section 65852.2 and 65852.22. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family dwelling. An Accessory dwelling unit also includes the following: an efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of the HSC, or a manufactured home, as 14 Department of Housing and Community Development 6 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines defined in Section 18007 of the HSC.
(b) "Activity" means any single eligible undertaking carried out as part of an Applicant's allocation(s) under the Program.
(c) “Affordable” means a housing unit that satisfies at least one of the following criteria:

1. If the unit is being rented to low-income, Very low-income or Extremely low-income households, it complies with the Multifamily Housing Program guidelines Section 7312 and the Section 7301 definition of “Affordable Rent”; or

2. If the unit is being sold, it is offered at an “Affordable housing cost”, as published in the Fannie Mae Selling Guide, Part B, Debt to Income Ratios, as updated annually
(https://www.fanniemae.com/content/guide/selling/b3/6/02.html#DTI.20Rat ios), and it complies with the income limits stated in the definitions of Moderate-Income and Lower-Income in this section; or

3. If the unit is being rented to Moderate-Income households, it is available at a gross rent, including a utility allowance, that does not exceed 30 percent of the applicable income eligibility level, and complies with the definition of Moderate-Income in these guidelines
(d) "Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing" (AOWH) means owner-occupied housing per HSC Section 50092.1 that is affordable to persons and families of low or moderate income, as that term is defined in HSC Section 50093, except in High-cost areas where Moderate-income shall include households earning up to 150 percent of AMI.
(e) “Annual Progress Report” (APR) means the Housing Element APR required by GC Section 65400 on the prior year’s activities and due to the Department April 1 of each year.
(f) “Annual Report" means a form issued by the Department and completed by a Local government awarded PLHA funds on which the Local government documents the uses and expenditures of any allocated funds and outcomes achieved. (g) "Applicant" means an eligible Local government applying for the program to administer one or more eligible activities. Applicant also means a Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund delegated by an eligible Local government to apply for the program and administer its allocation in accordance with all program rules. 15 Department of Housing and Community Development 7 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (h) “Area Median Income” or “AMI” means the most recent applicable county median family income published by the Department, available at the following link:
http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/income-limits/state-and-federal-incomelimits.shtml (i) “At risk of homelessness” means the same as defined in Title 24 Section 578.3 of the Code of Federal Regulations and also includes any household receiving rental assistance funded by the California Emergency Solutions and Housing (CESH) program or the California Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP). (j) “Capitalized Reserve for Services” means the reserve funded by the Local government pursuant to Section 301(a)(5) to address project supportive service budget deficits attributable to shortfalls in service funding sources.
(k) “Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy” or “CHAS” means annual data compiled by the United States Census Bureau for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to document the extent of housing problems and housing needs, particularly for low-income households.
(l) "Community Development Block Grant" or "CDBG" means the program created pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq., as amended.
(m) “Department” means the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
(n) “Extremely Low Income” has the meaning set forth in HSC Section 50106, which is a maximum of 30 percent of AMI. Grantees shall utilize income limits issued by the Department at the following link:
http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/income-limits/state-and-federal-incomelimits.shtml. (o) “Fund” means the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund pursuant to HSC Section 50470.
(p) “High-cost area” means those counties defined as high cost by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (at: https://www.fhfa.gov/DataTools/ and those counties for which HUD adjusted the Very low income and low-income rents due to high costs (at:
https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdrdatas_landing.html), as published by the Department in the annual PLHA Notice of Funding Availability.
(q) “Local government” means any city, including a charter city, any county, including a charter county, or a city and county, including a charter city and county. 16 Department of Housing and Community Development 8 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (r) “Local Housing Trust Fund” or “Regional Housing Trust Fund” means a public, joint public and private fund or charitable nonprofit organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which was established by legislation, ordinance, resolution (including nonprofit articles of incorporation), or a public-private partnership organized to receive specific revenue to address local or regional housing needs.
(s) “Low or Lower Income” has the meaning set forth in HSC Section 50079.5, which is a maximum of 80 percent of AMI. Grantees shall utilize income limits issued by the Department at the following link:
http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/income-limits/state-and-federal-incomelimits.shtml. (t) “Moderate-Income” has the meaning set forth in HSC Section 50093, which is a maximum of 120 percent AMI, or in High-cost areas, 150 percent of AMI. Grantees shall utilize income limits issued by the Department at the following link:
http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/income-limits/state-and-federal-incomelimits.shtml. (u) “Non-entitlement local government” means a Local government in an area which is not a metropolitan city or part of an urban county, a Local government that, as of September 1, 2017, was an incorporated city with a population of less than 50,000 or a county with an unincorporated area population of less than 200,000 persons which had not entered into a three-year Urban County Cooperation Agreement, or a Local government that was not otherwise entitled to receive CDBG funds directly from HUD. (v) “Operating subsidies” means payments to owners of affordable housing developments that make the housing more affordable by covering a portion of the ongoing costs of operating the development. Such payments would have the same effect as rental assistance.
(w)“Owner-occupied” means a dwelling which is occupied by the owner and includes a single family dwelling or a dwelling unit in a stock cooperative, as defined by Business and Professions Code (BPC), Section 11003.2, a community apartment project, as defined by BPC Section 11004, or a condominium project, as defined by subdivision (c) of BPC Section 11004. 5.
(x) "Plan" means the document submitted by the Applicant to the Department as part of a complete application in which the Applicant proposes to use allocated funds for at least one eligible Activity. The Plan shall have a term of five years. In succeeding years, the Local government is required to obtain the approval of the Department for any amendments made to the Plan, as set forth in Section 302(c)(5). (y) “Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program", “Program”, or "PLHA" means the program developed to annually allocate 70 percent of the moneys deposited into the Fund pursuant to HSC Section 50470(b)(2)(B)(i).
17 Department of Housing and Community Development 9 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (z) “Permanent supportive housing” has the same meaning as in HSC Section 50675.14, that is, housing with no limit on the length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the supportive housing residents in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community.

Permanent supportive housing may include associated facilities if used to provide services to housing residents. Permanent supportive housing does not include “health facility” as defined by HSC Section 1250 or any “alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility” as defined by HSC Section 11834.02 or “Community care facility” as defined in HSC Section 1502, “Mental health rehabilitation centers” as defined in Section 5675 of the Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC), or other residential treatment programs.
(aa)“Regional Housing Needs Allocation" or "RHNA" means the share of the regional housing need represented by persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county allocated to an Applicant Local government pursuant to GC Section 65584(b).
(bb)“Sponsor” means the legal entity or combination of legal entities with continuing control of a Rental Housing Development. Where the borrowing entity is or will be organized as a limited partnership, Sponsor includes the general partner or general partners who have effective control over the operation of the partnership, or, if the general partner is controlled by another entity, the controlling entity. Sponsor does not include the seller of the property to be developed as the rental housing Project, unless the seller will retain control of the Project for the period necessary to ensure Project feasibility as determined by the Department.
(cc) “Very Low Income” has the meaning set forth in HSC Section 50105, which is a maximum of 50 percent of AMI. Grantees shall utilize income limits issued by the Department at the following link:
http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/income-limits/state-and-federal-incomelimits.shtml.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470.5 and 50470, subdivision (b)(2).

ARTICLE II. PROGRAM FUNDING
Section 200. Allocations
(a) SB 2 created a dedicated revenue source for affordable housing and directed the Department to make available 70 percent of the moneys in the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund, collected on and after January 1, 2019, to Local governments through the following allocations:
18 Department of Housing and Community Development 10 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (1) Ninety percent of the moneys available shall be allocated based on the formula used under Federal law to allocate CDBG funds within California. This is the formula specified in Title 42 United States Code (USC), Section 5306. (A) The amount of funds awarded to each Local government eligible for the entitlement formula component shall be determined by the 90 percent of PLHA funds available pursuant to this paragraph (1) and the percentage of funds received by the entitlement Local government in the CDBG federal fiscal year 2017 allocation process performed by HUD.
(B) Through the formula specified in paragraph (1), the percentage of funds allocated to Non-entitlement local governments shall be distributed to Non-entitlement local governments through a competitive grant program. (2) Ten percent of the moneys available shall be allocated equitably among Non-entitlement local governments. The equitable allocation awarded to each Local government eligible for the Non-entitlement formula component shall be based on the sum of: (1) 50 percent of the funding available for the Non-entitlement formula component divided by the number of local governments eligible for the Non-entitlement formula component and (2) 50 percent of the funding allocated in proportion to each Non-entitlement local government’s share of the total most severe housing need in California’s Non-entitlement local governments, based upon the most recent HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy.
(b) After funds are appropriated by the Legislature as part of the budget act, the Department will issue one or more Notices of Funding Availability (NOFA). Local governments shall submit an application under the NOFA pertaining to the specific allocation for which the Local government is eligible.
(c) It is recommended that Local governments that were urban counties in accordance with the distribution of funds pursuant to the formula specified in 42 USC, Section 5306 for the federal fiscal year 2017 provide a proportional share of their allocations to Local governments within their county with which they had a three-year Urban County Cooperation Agreement as of September 1, 2017, provided that these Local governments meet the threshold requirements of the PLHA and expend sub-allocated funds for eligible activities within the deadlines of the Standard Agreement governing the sub-allocation.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B).

Section 201. Award Amounts
(a) The formula allocation amounts derived pursuant to the formulas in Section 200 will be announced in the NOFA.
19 Department of Housing and Community Development 11 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (b) The maximum application amount and the minimum application amount for the competitive allocation will be stated in the NOFA.
(c) An Applicant may apply for its formula allocation from the current and two prior NOFAs for which it did not receive an award, provided that the award meets the requirements of Section 304(a).

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B).

ARTICLE III. FORMULA ALLOCATION COMPONENT
Section 300. Eligible Applicants
(a) Eligible Applicants for the entitlement formula component described in Section 100(b)(1) are limited to the metropolitan cities and urban counties allocated a grant for the federal fiscal year 2017 pursuant to the federal CDBG formula specified in 42 USC, Section 5306.
(b) Eligible Applicants for the non-entitlement formula component described in Section 100(b)(2) and the competitive grant program component described in Section 100(b)(3) are limited to the Non-entitlement local governments. (c) A Local government may delegate another Local government to submit an application and administer on its behalf its formula allocation of Program funds, provided that the Local governments enter into a legally binding agreement and the funds are expended for eligible Activities and consistent with Program requirements. The delegating Local government shall be identified in the application. The administering Local government shall be responsible for all Program requirements.
(d) A Local government may delegate a Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund to submit an application and administer on its behalf its formula allocation of Program funds, provided that the Local government enters into a legally binding agreement with the Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund and the funds are expended for eligible Activities and consistent with Program requirements. The delegating Local government shall be identified in the application. The Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund shall be responsible for all Program requirements. (e) An Applicant shall not be eligible to receive a new allocation of PLHA funds if it has an uncommitted amount of formula PLHA funds greater than the following:
(1) Four times the pending annual allocation if the pending annual allocation is $125,000 or less;
(2) $500,000 if the pending annual allocation is greater than $125,000 and less than $500,000;
20 Department of Housing and Community Development 12 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (3) The amount of the pending annual allocation if the pending allocation is $500,000 or more.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B).

Section 301. Eligible Activities
(a) Eligible Activities are limited to one or more of the following:
(1) The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily, residential live-work, rental housing that is Affordable to Extremely low-,Very low-, Low-, or Moderate-income households, including necessary Operating subsidies.
(2) The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of Affordable rental and ownership housing, including Accessory dwelling units (ADUs), that meets the needs of a growing workforce earning up to 120 percent of AMI, or 150 percent of AMI in high-cost areas. ADUs shall be available for occupancy for a term of no less than 30 days.
(3) Matching portions of funds placed into Local or Regional Housing Trust Funds. (4) Matching portions of funds available through the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund pursuant to subdivision (d) of HSC Section 34176. (5) Capitalized Reserves for Services connected to the preservation and creation of new Permanent supportive housing.
(6) Assisting persons who are experiencing or At risk of homelessness, including, but not limited to, providing rapid rehousing, rental assistance, supportive/case management services that allow people to obtain and retain housing, operating and capital costs for navigation centers and emergency shelters, and the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permanent and transitional housing.
(A) This Activity may include subawards to Administrative Entities as defined in HSC Section 50490(a)(1-3) that were awarded CESH program or HEAP funds for rental assistance to continue assistance to these households. (B) Applicants must provide rapid rehousing, rental assistance, navigation centers, emergency shelter, and transitional housing activities in a manner consistent with the Housing First practices described in 25 CCR, Section 8409, subdivision (b)(1)-(6) and in compliance with WIC Section 8255(b)(8). An Applicant allocated funds for the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of Permanent supportive housing shall incorporate the core 21 Department of Housing and Community Development 13 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines components of Housing First, as provided in WIC Section 8255, subdivision (b). (7) Accessibility modifications in Lower-income Owner-occupied housing. (8) Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed or vacant homes and apartments. (9) Homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance.
(10) Fiscal incentives made by a county to a city within the county to incentivize approval of one or more Affordable housing Projects, or matching funds invested by a county in an Affordable housing development Project in a city within the county, provided that the city has made an equal or greater investment in the Project. The county fiscal incentives shall be in the form of a grant or low-interest loan to an Affordable housing Project. Matching funds investments by both the county and the city also shall be a grant or low-interest deferred loan to the Affordable housing Project.
(b) A Local government that receives an allocation shall use no more than 5 percent of the allocation for costs related to the administration of the Activity(ies) for which the allocation was made. Staff and overhead costs directly related to carrying out the eligible activities described in Section 301 are “activity costs” and not subject to the cap on “administrative costs.” A Local government may share any funds available for administrative costs with entities that are administering its allocation. (c) Two or more Local governments that receive PLHA allocations may expend those moneys on an eligible jointly funded project as provided for in Section 50470 (b)(2)(B)(ii)(IV). An eligible jointly funded project must be an eligible Activity pursuant to Section 301(a) and be located within the boundaries of one of the Local governments.
(d) Entitlement Local governments may use the flow of PLHA funds to incentivize private lender loans and to guarantee payments for some or all public agency bond financings for activities consistent with the uses identified in Section 301 “Eligible Activities”. This loan guarantee Activity must be identified and fully explained in the Applicant’s “Plan”.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivisions (b)(2)(B)(ii)(IV), (b)(2)(D)(i-x), and (b)(3).

Section 302. Threshold Requirements
Applicants must meet all the following threshold requirements for participation in the formula allocation:
(a) Housing Element compliance: The Applicant and any delegating Local government, if applicable, must have a Housing Element that has been adopted by the Local 22 Department of Housing and Community Development 14 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines government’s governing body by the application deadline and subsequently determined to be in substantial compliance with state Housing Element Law pursuant to GC Section 65585. A Local government’s current Housing Element compliance status can be obtained by referencing the Department’s website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element. (b) APR on the Housing Element submitted to the Department: The Applicant and any delegating Local government, if applicable, must submit to the Department the APR required by GC Section 65400 for the current or prior year by the application deadline date.
(1) Please be advised that the Department will not accept other reports in lieu of the APR. Housing Authority Financial Reports, Redevelopment Reports, and other similar reports will not be accepted as meeting this requirement. If uncertain of the status of the report submittal for a Local government, please contact the Department for more information.
(c) Submit, by the deadline specified in the NOFA, on a form made available by the Department, a complete application which shall meet the following minimum requirements:
(1) Application requests an allocation pursuant to Section 200 in order to carry out one or more of the eligible activities described in Section 301. Except for a jointly funded project as described in Section 301(c), any activities must be carried out within the jurisdiction of the Applicant Local government. (2) Submission of the application is authorized by the governing boards of the Applicant.
(3) Certification in the resolution that, if the Local government proposes allocation of funds for any Activity to another entity, the Local government’s selection process shall avoid conflicts of interest and shall be accessible to the public. For the purposes of this paragraph, “entity” means a housing developer or program operator; “entity” does not mean an administering Local government to whom a Local government delegates its PLHA formula allocation, pursuant to Section 300(d).
(4) A Plan detailing:
(A) The manner in which allocated funds will be used for eligible Activities. (B) A description of the way the Local government will prioritize investments that increase the supply of housing for households with incomes at or below 60 percent of AMI. Programs targeted at households at or below 60 percent of AMI will be deemed to meet this requirement.
23 Department of Housing and Community Development 15 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (C) A description of how the Plan is consistent with the programs set forth in the Local government’s Housing Element.
(D) Evidence that the Plan was authorized and adopted by resolution by the Local government and that the public had an adequate opportunity to review and comment on its content.
(E) The following for each proposed Activity:
(i) A description of each proposed Activity, pursuant to Section 301, and the percentage of funding allocated to it. The description shall specifically include the percentage of funds, if any, directed to AOWH. (ii) The projected number of households to be served at each income level and a comparison to the unmet share of the RHNA at each income level. (iii)A description of major steps/actions and a proposed schedule required for the implementation and completion of the Activity.
(iv)The period of affordability and level of affordability for each Activity. Rental Projects are required to have affordability periods of at least 55 years. (5) The Plan submitted in response to the NOFA shall be for a term of five years. Local governments shall obtain approval of the Department for amendments made to the Plan in each succeeding year of the term of the Plan. Reallocations of more than 10 percent of funds among Activities require amendment of the Plan, with approval granted by the governing body at a publicly noticed public meeting. (6) A certification that, if funds are used for the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of for-sale housing projects or units within for-sale housing projects, the grantee shall record a deed restriction against the property that will ensure compliance with one of the following requirements if the property is no longer the primary residence of the homeowner due to sale, transfer or lease, unless it is in conflict with the requirements of another public funding source or law:
(A) The PLHA loan and any interest thereon shall be repaid to the Local government’s PLHA account. The Local government shall reuse the repayments consistent with Section 301; or
(B) The initial owner and any subsequent owner shall sell the home at an Affordable housing cost to a qualified Lower-Income or Moderate-Income household; or
(C)The homeowner and the Local government shall share the equity in the unit pursuant to an equity-sharing agreement. The grantee shall reuse the proceeds 24 Department of Housing and Community Development 16 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines of the equity-sharing agreement consistent with this section. (7) A certification that, if funds are used for the development of an Affordable Rental Housing Development, the Local government shall make the PLHA assistance in the form of a low-interest, deferred loan to the Sponsor of the Project. The loan shall be evidenced through a Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust, and a Regulatory Agreement shall restrict occupancy and rents in accordance with the Local government-approved underwriting of the Project for a term of at least 55 years.
(8) A Program income reuse plan describing how repaid loans will be reused for eligible activities specified in Section 301.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii).

Section 303. Application Review
(a) Applicants must submit a complete application by the deadline stated in the NOFA in order to be eligible for funding. Application forms provided by the Department will be available upon release of the NOFA and will require Applicants to submit the forms and other documents to demonstrate that the Local government has met threshold requirements.
(b) The Department may request additional information to complete its review. (c) Applications recommended for funding are subject to conditions specified by the Department. Applicants will receive an official letter of award after the Department approves funding recommendations.
(d) The Department may issue an Over-the-Counter formula allocation NOFA after completing the NOFA process so that Local governments who were not able to submit formula allocation applications by the application deadline will have another opportunity to do so.
(e) If funding proposed in Local government Plans for AOWH activities is lower than 20 percent of the moneys available in the Fund, the Department may require Local governments to use a specific percentage of their annual formula allocations in some future year for AOWH activities as part of the annual funding process.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(A).
25 Department of Housing and Community Development 17 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines Section 304. Deadlines and Funding Requirements
(a) The initial PLHA application, including the Plan, must be submitted within 48 months of the budget appropriation (for example, the budget appropriation for 2019 is July 1, 2019, so the application deadline is June 30, 2023). (b) Funds allocated to Local governments that do not submit a complete application by the deadline stated in subsection (a) will revert to the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Fund for the Multifamily Housing Program or for Department-administered technical assistance to Local governments.
(c) A Local government may petition the Department to return any funds allocated to it to be used for the Multifamily Housing Program.
(d) Except for predevelopment expenses for construction projects funded by PLHA and costs to develop and prepare the Plan and the PLHA application, no costs incurred more than one year prior to commitment by the Local government may be paid from PLHA funds. Reimbursement of expenses to prepare the Plan and the PLHA application are subject to the cap on administrative fees. (e) After the Standard Agreement and attachments have been finalized, the Local government will follow provided instructions for signing all required documents. The Local government must submit all supporting materials and a signed Standard Agreement within the timeline provided in the instruction. (f) After the Standard Agreement has been executed by the state, the Local government may submit a request for 100 percent of the funds allocated to be used for eligible expenditures for the Activity(ies) that received the award, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Standard Agreement.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(i) and subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(VI).

ARTICLE IV. COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION COMPONENT
Section 400. Eligible Applicants
(a) Eligible Applicants for the non-entitlement competitive allocation described in Section 100(b)(3) are limited to Non-entitlement local governments. For development of Rental Housing Projects, the Sponsor must be a co-Applicant.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(i)(I).
26 Department of Housing and Community Development 18 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines Section 401. Eligible Activities
(a) Eligible Activities are limited to the following and must take place within the jurisdiction of the Applicant Local government:
(1) Development of new multifamily rental housing that is Affordable to households at or below 60 percent of AMI or substantial rehabilitation of multifamily rental housing that will be Affordable to households at or below 60 percent of AMI, but which is not currently restricted as Affordable housing; or (2) Assistance to persons who are experiencing or At risk of homelessness, including, but not limited to, through rapid rehousing, or rental assistance, supportive services and case management services that allow people to obtain and retain housing, operating and capital costs for navigation centers, or new construction, rehabilitation, or preservation of permanent or transitional rental housing.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(i)(I)(ia), (b)(2)(B)(i)(I)(ib) and subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(V).

Section 402. Threshold Requirements
Applicants must meet all the following threshold requirements for participation in the competitive allocation:
(a) Housing Element compliance: The Applicant must have a Housing Element that has been adopted by the jurisdiction’s governing body by the application deadline date and subsequently determined to be in substantial compliance with state Housing Element Law pursuant to GC Section 65585. A Local government’s current Housing Element compliance status can be obtained by referencing the Department’s website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element. (b) APR on the Housing Element submitted to the Department: The Applicant must submit to the Department the APR required by GC Section 65400 for the current or prior year by the application deadline date.
(1) Please be advised that the Department will not accept other reports in lieu of the APR. Housing Authority Financial Reports, Redevelopment Reports, and other similar reports will not be accepted as meeting this requirement. If uncertain of the status of the report submittal for a Local government, please contact the Department for more information.
(c) Submit by the deadline specified in the NOFA, on a form made available by the Department, a complete application which shall meet the following minimum requirements:
(1) Application requests a grant pursuant to Section 100(b)(3) in order to carry out one 27 Department of Housing and Community Development 19 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines or both of the eligible Activities set forth in Section 401. (2) Submission of the application is authorized by the governing board of the Applicant and by the developer co-applicant, if any.
(3) Certification in the resolution that, if the Local government proposes allocation of funds for any Activity to another entity, the selection process shall avoid conflicts of interest, and shall be accessible to the public.
(4) Demonstration of readiness, including site control for development Projects, land use entitlements, environmental review and commitments of other funding and resources required, as further set forth in the NOFA;
(5) Underwriting requirements:
(A)Uniform Multifamily Regulations Subchapter 19 of Title 25, Division 1, Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8300), as amended from time to time, and the Multifamily Housing Program Guidelines (commencing with Section 7300), as amended from time to time, are hereby incorporated by reference into this subchapter and shall apply to Rental Housing Developments receiving assistance under the PLHA competitive allocation. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Subchapter 19 and these Guidelines, the provisions of these Guidelines shall prevail.
(i) Section 8312(c) of the Uniform Multifamily Regulations is hereby amended to read:
(c) For Projects utilizing 4 percent tax credits, Developer Fee payments shall not exceed the amount that may be included in Project costs pursuant to 4 CCR, Section 10327. In addition, the Developer Fee paid from development funding sources shall not exceed the following:
(1) For acquisition and/or rehabilitation Projects, or adaptive reuse Projects, the lesser of the amount of Developer Fee in Project costs or $2,000,000. (2) For new construction Projects, the base limit shall be the lesser of the amount that may be included in Project costs or $2,200,000. To arrive at the final limit on Developer Fee paid from development funding sources, the base limit shall then be multiplied by a ratio that is the average of (i) the difference between 2 and the Project’s high-cost ratio, as calculated pursuant to 4 CCR, Section 10317(i)(6) or successor language and (ii) 100 percent.
(ii) Section 8312(d) of the Uniform Multifamily Regulations shall not apply. (iii)Section 8314(a)(1)(A) of the Uniform Multifamily Regulations is amended to read:
(A) Approved deferred Developer Fee, pursuant to Section 8312, provided that the aggregate of the Developer Fee paid from sources and paid as deferred shall not exceed $3,500,000.
28 Department of Housing and Community Development 20 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (B)Period of affordability: All assisted rental units shall be restricted for not less than 55 years.
(C)All development Projects shall demonstrate fiscal integrity.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii).

Section 403. Selection Criteria
(a) Applications submitted within a competitive funding round shall be evaluated using the following criteria. Total available points shall equal 100.

1. Priority Points – 25 points
A. Population - 5 points
(i) If the Applicant is a county that has a population of 200,000 or less within the unincorporated areas of the county, the Applicant shall receive all points.

B. Prior Award – 5 points
(i) If the Applicant did not receive an award based on the formula specified in 42 USC, Section 5306 in 2016, the Applicant shall receive all points.

And either C (i) or C (ii) or C (iii) below:

C. Activity
(i) Assistance for Homeless Persons through Program Activities – 15 points
(a) Applications to assist persons experiencing or At risk of homelessness, including, but not limited to, through programs providing rapid rehousing, or rental assistance, or operating assistance to navigation centers shall receive all points.

Or
(ii) Assistance to Homeless Persons through Development of Navigation Centers– 15 points
(a) Applications for construction of navigation centers shall receive all points.

Or
29 Department of Housing and Community Development 21 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (iii) Assistance for Homeless Persons through Rental Projects – 15 points (a) Applications for the new construction, rehabilitation, or preservation of permanent or transitional rental housing in which all or at least 10 percent of the units are restricted to occupancy by tenants who are homeless or At risk of homelessness shall receive all points.

2. Evaluation Criteria – 75 points
Precise scoring for these factors will be set forth in the NOFA.

A. Community Need – 30 points
(i) Applicants will receive up to a maximum of 30 points based on the rate of households experiencing the most severe housing need according to the most recent HUD CHAS dataset in the Applicant Local government.

Applicants will receive points in proportion to this percentage.

B. Applicant Administrative Experience – 15 points
(i) Applicants with prior experience administering local, state or federal affordable housing or community development programs or who have entered into a contract with an entity with prior experience in the implementation of local, state or federal affordable housing or community development programs will receive up to 15 points.

C. Demonstrated Capacity – 30 points
(i) Capacity points will be based on:
(a) Sponsor experience in Affordable Rental Housing Development and ownership (Up to 30 points) or
(b) Navigation center development experience (for development of these facilities) (Up to 30 points) or
(c) Program Operator experience (for non-development Activities) (Up to 30 points)
(b) Where applications requesting funds for more than one eligible Activity pursuant to Section 401 are permitted by the NOFA, each Activity will receive a separate score for each rating factor, and have an individual Activity total. It is possible that one Activity may score highly enough to receive an award, and the other Activity does not. (c) In the event of tied point scores and insufficient funding for both applications, the Department shall rank the tied applications as follows:
(1) If one of the tied applications is for an Affordable Rental Housing Development and the other is for a program Activity or development of a navigation center, the 30 Department of Housing and Community Development 22 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines Affordable Rental Housing Development application will be selected for funding; (2) If one of the tied applications is for a navigation center and the other is for a program Activity, the navigation center will be selected for funding; (3) If both of the tied applications are for Affordable Rental Housing Developments, the Project with the lowest weighted average affordability of Restricted Units will be selected;
(4) If both of the tied applications are for navigation centers, the facility that provides overnight shelter to the greatest number of people will be selected; (5) If both of the tied applications are for programs, the Local government with the highest rate of households experiencing the most severe housing need according to the most recent HUD CHAS dataset will be selected.
(d) In the event there are insufficient funds to fulfill the entire funding request for the next highest scored application (Application A), the Department will determine whether Application A is feasible without the full funding request. If Application A is not feasible without full funding, the Department may offer the remaining funds to the application whose score is immediately below Application A. If the remaining funds are insufficient to fulfill the funding request for that application (Application B), the Department will again determine whether this application is feasible without the full funding request. If Application B is not feasible without the full funding request, the Department will perform the same analysis for the application whose score is immediately below Application B.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(i)(I)(ia) and subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(V).

Section 404. Application Review
(a) Applicants must submit a complete application by the deadline stated in the NOFA in order to be eligible for funding. Application forms provided by the Department will be available upon release of the NOFA and will require Applicants to submit the forms and other documents to demonstrate that the Local government has met threshold requirements. The application will require submission of documentation adequate to demonstrate that the application has earned the appropriate number of points. (b) The Department may request additional information to complete its review, provided that the new information would not affect scoring.
(c) Applications recommended for funding are subject to conditions specified by the Department. Applicants will receive an official letter of award after the Department approves funding recommendations.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii).
31 Department of Housing and Community Development 23 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines Section 405. Deadlines and Funding Requirements
(a) Applicants will be required to enter into a state Standard Agreement (Standard Agreement) that will set forth conditions for funding and milestones that are required to be met.
(b) After the Standard Agreement and attachments have been finalized, the Local government will follow provided instructions for signing all required documents. The Local government must submit all supporting materials and a signed Standard Agreement within the timeline provided in the instructions or risk forfeiting the grant award.
(c) Except for predevelopment expenses for construction projects funded by PLHA and the costs to develop and prepare the PLHA application, no costs incurred more than one year prior to commitment by the Local government may be paid from PLHA funds.

Reimbursement of expenses to prepare the PLHA application is subject to the cap on administrative fees.
(d) Grant funds shall not be disbursed until:
(1) the Department authorizes loan closing, in the case of development projects; or (2) all general and special conditions have been complied with, in the case of other Activities.
(e) If funds are used for the development of an Affordable Rental Housing Development, the Local government shall make the PLHA assistance in the form of a low-interest, deferred loan to the Sponsor of the project. The loan shall be evidenced through a Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust, and a Regulatory Agreement shall restrict occupancy and rents in accordance with the Department-approved underwriting of the project for at least 55 years.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(VI).

ARTICLE V. ADMINISTRATION
Section 500. Accounting Records
(a) The grantee shall establish a separate ledger account for receipts and expenditures of grant funds and maintain expenditure details in accordance with the approved work plan, budget, and schedule. Separate bank accounts are not required. (b) The grantee shall maintain documentation of its financial records for expenditures incurred during the course of the PLHA Activity in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Such records shall be kept for at least five years after the close-out report is submitted to the Department.
32 Department of Housing and Community Development 24 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines (c) The Department or its designated representative shall have the right to review and copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the PLHA grant.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(III) and subdivision (b)(2)(B)(IV) and subdivision (b)(3).

Section 501. Audits/Monitoring of Project Files
(a) Grantee shall maintain PLHA files which, at a minimum, should include the following information and reports:
1) Project/Activity description
2) Land/site Information
3) Planning & zoning history (as appropriate)
4) Records of public hearings and public comments
5) Relocation needs (as appropriate)
6) Contracts, loan and grant agreements, Standard Agreement 7) Environmental records & reports/findings (as appropriate) 8) Design/engineering reports & plans (as appropriate)
9) Description of targeted beneficiaries, services to be provided, household incomes, special needs
10)PLHA Activity costs, invoices, purchase orders, sources and uses of funds for PLHA Activities, terms & conditions of financings, draws and all supporting documentation, change orders (as appropriate)
11)Activity schedule and amendments
12)History of Plan amendments
13)Procurement policy used for PLHA Activity(ies)
(b) The grantee shall maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three years after the close-out report is submitted, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated in the Standard Agreement.
(c) The grantee shall be responsible for monitoring Rental Housing Developments that received PLHA funds for the term of the loan, including, but not limited to, the Projects’ compliance with the occupancy and rent requirements set forth in the Regulatory Agreement, compliance with reserve requirements, and the compliance with habitability standards.
(d) The grantee shall be responsible for monitoring AOWH loans to assure that the homes remain Owner-occupied.
(e) If requested by the Department, the grantee shall obtain a report from a qualified, 33 Department of Housing and Community Development 25 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines licensed third party that certifies to the amounts of disbursement and identifies the specific Activities for which the disbursements were made. Such a report is permitted to be a component of the A-133 audit.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(IV) and subdivision (b)(3).

Section 502. Cancellation and Termination
(a) In the event that it is determined, at the sole discretion of the Department, that the grantee is not meeting the terms and conditions of the Standard Agreement, the Department shall issue a notice to stop work. Immediately upon receiving the written notice to stop work, the grantee shall cease all work under the Standard Agreement.

The Department has the sole discretion to determine the grantee’s compliance with the terms and conditions after issuance of a stop work order, and to deliver a written notice to the grantee to resume work under this Standard Agreement. (b) The Department shall terminate the Standard Agreement if the grantee is not in compliance with the Guidelines or the terms and conditions of the Standard Agreement. At least 30 days prior to the effective date of the termination of the Standard Agreement, the Department shall provide written notice to the grantee of its intent to cancel the funding allocation. The notice shall specify the reason for early termination and may permit the grantee or the Department to cure any deficiency(ies) prior to the early termination date. The grantee will submit requested documents to the Department within 30 days of the early termination notice. (c) Failure to meet reporting requirements will result in notice to the grantee that it must satisfactorily cure any deficiencies within three months of the notice or it will forfeit the following year’s PLHA formula allocation and be ineligible for a competitive award. The Local government will forfeit subsequent PLHA formula allocations and be ineligible for a competitive award until the Department determines that the Local government has met reporting requirements.
(d) The Department may, as it deems appropriate or necessary, request the repayment of funds from a Local government or offset future years’ funds, or pursue any other remedies available to it by law for failure to comply with the Guidelines and/or the terms and conditions of the Standard Agreement.
(e) Co-Applicants may be adversely impacted by a notice to stop work and/or termination if one grantee is deemed by the Department to not meet the terms and conditions of the Standard Agreement, or fails to meet the reporting requirements outlined in Section 503.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(IV) and subdivision (b)(3). 34 Department of Housing and Community Development 26 2019 PLHA Final Guidelines Section 503. Reporting
(a) The Department shall provide grantees with reporting formats and instructions. (b) Annual Reports are required from all grantees pursuant to HSC Section 50470(b)(2)(B)(ii)(III) each year by July 31 for the term of the Standard Agreement.

The Annual Report shall document the uses and expenditures of all awarded allocations and outcomes achieved. This report must be signed by both the Local government’s PLHA administrator and the Local government’s City Manager (or his/her designee), or Chief Executive Officer (or his/her designee) or Chief Financial Officer (or his/her designee). The Annual Report must describe any proposed amendment(s) to the approved Activity and schedule.
(c) Upon expenditure of all allocated funds and completion of the Activities funded by PLHA, the grantee shall submit a close-out report, which will be part of the Annual Report.
(d) The Department may request additional information as needed to meet other applicable reporting or audit requirements.

NOTE: Authority cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (d). Reference cited: HSC Section 50470, subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(III) and subdivision (b)(2)(B)(ii)(IV). 35 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPART MENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
651 Bannon Street
Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 263-2771
December 29, 2023
Amended October 15, 2024 (CY 2023 Allocation)
MEMORANDUM FOR: Potential Applicants
FROM: Jennifer Seeger, Deputy Director
Division of State Financial Assistance
SUBJECT: Notice of Funding Availability
Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program
Calendar Year 2023 Formula Allocation
The California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department or HCD) is pleased to announce the release of the 2024 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program (PLHA) Local Government Formula Component Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for approximately $320 million in calendar year (CY) 2021 and 2022 funds as well as new CY 2023 funds as follows:

Allocation Year NOFA Funds Available
CY 2023 calendar year $128.6 million
CY 2022 calendar year $132.1 million
CY 2021 calendar year $59.9 million
Please refer to Appendix A for detailed information on funds available to each eligible locality under this NOFA for housing-related projects and programs that assist in addressing unmet housing needs of their local communities. Appendix A reflects allocations available as of October 4, 2024. If an application has been previously submitted but no award has been made as of the date of this NOFA, there is no need to resubmit the application for CY 2022 and CY 2021 funds. A new application will be required to request CY 2023 funds.

This NOFA will remain open to eligible Applicants through June 30, 2027. The NOFA will be augmented with additional CY funds as additional revenues are collected and made available.

All Applicants must ensure they meet all threshold requirements outlined in this NOFA and Program Guidelines prior to the submittal of an application. *** PLEASE NOTE ***
All CY 2021 funds unawarded by June 31, 2025 will revert to the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Fund established to be used for the Multifamily Housing Program (Chapter 6.7 commencing with Section 50675) pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50470 (b)((2)(B)(ii)(VI) to be made available through a future Multifamily Housing Program Notice of Funding Availability.

To receive an award of CY 2021 funds, Applicants are required to submit an application and demonstrate a fully compliant housing element and submittal of the applicable Annual Progress Report(s) as detailed in Part II, Section F or G by no later than February 28, 2025.
36 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program
CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA

Applications must be submitted through the online application portal.

The application submittal portal will be available and open for applications beginning October 15, 2024. Personal deliveries will not be accepted. No facsimiles, incomplete applications, application revisions, or walk-in application packages will be accepted.

PLHA Program Guidelines, application forms, and instructions are available on the Department’s PLHA Program website. If you have questions regarding this NOFA, please email the Department at [email protected]. The Department will continue to offer bi-weekly office hours and opportunities for technical assistance to all potential Applicants. To receive information on workshops, office hours, and other program-related updates, please subscribe to the PLHA listserv.
37 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program
Notice of Funding Availability
CY 2023 Formula Allocation
Gavin Newsom,
Governor State of California
Tomiquia Moss, Secretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency
Gustavo Velasquez, Director
California Department of Housing and Community Development PLHA Program Website
Email: [email protected]
October 15, 2024
38 Table of Contents
I. New in this NOFA................................................................................................................ 1 II. Overview and Timeline........................................................................................................ 1 III. Program Requirements .................................................................................................... 2 A. Eligible Applicants ............................................................................................................... 2 B. Eligible Activities.................................................................................................................. 3 C. Allocation of funding and limits............................................................................................ 4 D. Program Administrative, Activity Delivery Costs, and Reimbursement of Costs................. 5 E. Application review ............................................................................................................... 5 F. Threshold requirements for First-Time Applicants ............................................................... 5 G. Threshold requirements for Previous Grantees................................................................... 8 H. Administration and Reporting Requirements ...................................................................... 9 IV. Application Webinar ......................................................................................................... 9 V. Appeals ............................................................................................................................... 9 A. Basis of Appeals.................................................................................................................. 9 B. Appeal Process and Deadlines.......................................................................................... 10 C. Decision ............................................................................................................................ 10 VI. Other terms and conditions ............................................................................................ 10 A. Right to modify or suspend................................................................................................ 10 B. Disclosure of application.................................................................................................... 11 C. Conflicts ............................................................................................................................ 11 Appendix A .............................................................................................................................. 12 Appendix B .............................................................................................................................. 18 Appendix C .............................................................................................................................. 23 Appendix D .............................................................................................................................. 24 39 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 1 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Notice of Funding Availability
Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program
Local Government Formula Component
CY 2023 Allocation
I. New in this NOFA
A. Affordable Ownership Worker Housing (AOWH) Requirements Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50470(b)(2)(A), twenty percent (20%) of the moneys collected and deposited in the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund shall be expended for Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing (AOWH).

The Department monitors compliance with this requirement both based on allocations adopted in required 5-year plans and any amendments to that plan as well as actual documented expenditures. Based on these indicators, HCD has determined that at the end of the current 5-year period applicable to CY 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 allocations, funds projected to be expended on AOWH are trailing behind the required 20 percent. As such, the Department will, for this final NOFA covered by the 2020-2025 plans, require a set percentage of funds requested to be for AOWH activities.

These requirements are detailed in Section III(B)(1) of this NOFA {Program Overview, Eligible Applicants, Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing Requirements}.

II. Overview and Timeline
The California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department or HCD) is announcing the release of the calendar year (CY) Allocation Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program’s Local Government Formula Component Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).

Funding for this NOFA is provided pursuant to Senate Bill 2 (SB 2) (Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017). SB 2 established the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund (Fund) and authorizes the Department to allocate 70 percent of moneys collected and deposited in the Fund, beginning in calendar year 2019, to Local governments for eligible housing and homelessness activities. The intent of the bill is to provide a permanent, on- going source of funding to Local governments for housing-related projects and programs that assist in addressing the unmet housing needs of their local communities.

This NOFA represents the fifth CY allocation of moneys deposited in the Fund for the prior CY and includes any remaining unawarded funds not requested by eligible Applicants for prior and available CYs.

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this NOFA shall have the meanings set forth in PLHA Guidelines Section 101.
40 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 2 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Applicants may apply at any time after the release of the NOFA, however, any Applicant requesting CY 2021 funds (see appendices A and D), must meet all threshold requirements set forth in the PLHA Program Guidelines, Article III, Section 302, including housing element compliance and Annual Progress Report submittal requirements) and submit all required application materials no later than February 28, 2025.

Awards will be made on a rolling basis as they are received, reviewed, and determined to have meet all threshold requirements. If an application is submitted and determined to be incomplete (including housing element compliance and Annual Progress Report submittal), the Applicant will be alerted to the deficiencies that need to be addressed and the application will be rejected. No award will be made until those deficiencies are addressed to the satisfaction of the Department. Once addressed, the Applicant will need to resubmit the entire application package for reconsideration.

Please note that per state statute, any CY 2021 funds unawarded by June 30, 2025 will revert to the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Fund established to be used for the Multifamily Housing Program.

III. Program Requirements
The following is provided as a summary for the allocation of the PLHA formula funds to Local governments and is not to be considered a complete representation of the eligibility, threshold, or other requirements, terms, and conditions. All Applicants should fully review the PLHA Program Guidelines for full requirements.

This 2024 NOFA represents the fifth year of funding under the PLHA program for the Entitlement and Non-Entitlement Local government Formula Component as detailed below:

Revenue
Collection Period
NOFA
Issuance
Allocation Application and Award Deadlines
CY 2019 2020 Reverted to MHP as of 6/30/2023
CY 2020 2021 Reverted to MHP as of 6/30/2024
CY 2021 2022 Must apply for funds by February 28, 2025, and be awarded by June 30, 2025 or funds will revert to MHP
CY 2022 2023 Must apply for funds by February 28, 2026, and be awarded by June 30, 2026, or funds will revert to MHP
CY 2023 2024 Must apply for funds by February 28, 2027, and be awarded by June 30, 2027 or funds will revert to MHP
*Please note, application deadlines for reverting funds may be established in future NOFA amendments A. Eligible Applicants
An Applicant must be an Entitlement Local government, a Non-Entitlement Local government, or a Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund delegated by the Local government pursuant to the PLHA Guidelines Article III, Section 300. 41 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 3 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA

1. Delegation of Formula Allocation
Per PLHA Guidelines Section 300 (c) and (d), a Local government may delegate to another Local government or Local Housing or Regional Housing Trust Fund to submit an application and administer on its behalf its formula allocation of Program funds, provided that the parties enter into a legally binding agreement and the funds are expended for eligible Activities and consistent with Program requirements. The delegating entity shall be identified in the application. The administering entity shall be responsible for all Program requirements.

Upon delegating its entire formula allocation to another Local government or to a Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund, the Local government that delegated their allocation is no longer involved in the PLHA application or administration of the PLHA grant for the full term of the PLHA Plan, which extends through 2023. The delegated Local government or Trust Fund assumes full responsibility for compliance with statute and for meeting all the Department’s requirements, including any penalties for non-compliance.

A Local government can subgrant a portion of its allocation to another entity, as permitted by PLHA Guidelines Section 302(c)(3). When a Local government subgrants a portion of its allocation to another entity, the Local government remains fully accountable and responsible for compliance with statute and for meeting all of the Department’s requirements, including any penalties for noncompliance.

B. Eligible Activities
PLHA funds allocated to eligible Applicants must be used to carry out one or more of the eligible activities listed in the PLHA Guidelines, Article III, Section 301. All services must be provided within the county containing the Local government recipient.

1. Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing Requirements a. First time Applicants requesting funds will be required to allocate 40 percent of funds requested to AOWH activities as defined below:
i. AOWH is defined as “owner-occupied housing that is affordable to persons and families of low or moderate income, as that term is defined in HSC Section 50093, except in high-cost areas where moderate income shall include households earning up to 150 percent of AMI.”
42 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 4 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA ii. Eligible AOWH activities include the following:

Guideline
Activity
Description AOWH Applicability
2 Predevelopment, development,
acquisition, rehabilitation, and
preservation of Affordable rental and
ownership housing, including Accessory
Dwelling Units (ADUs), that meets the
needs of a growing workforce earning
up to 120% AMI, or 150% AMI in highcost areas. ADUs shall be available for occupancy for a term of no less than 30
days.

Only those expenditures
directly related to
ownership housing will
count towards the 20%
requirement. Must be
documented after
expenditure of funds.
3 Matching portions of funds placed into
Local or Regional Housing Trust Funds.
4 Matching portions of funds available
through the Low- and Moderate-Income
Housing Asset Fund pursuant to
subdivision (d) of HSC Section 34176.
7 Accessibility modifications in Lowerincome Owner-occupied housing.All expenditures 8 Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate
foreclosed or vacant homes and
apartments.

Only those expenditures
directly related to
ownership housing will
count towards the 20%
requirement. Must be
documented after
expenditure of funds.
9 Homeownership opportunities,
including, but not limited to, down
payment assistance.

All expenditures
C. Allocation of funding and limits
Appendix A lists the dollar amount of the available PLHA funds by CY allocation.

If a Local government applied for and received a CY allocation, there is a blank in the applicable column(s).

To avoid amending the Standard Agreement each year and to expedite the disbursement of PLHA funds, the Standard Agreement and the Applicant’s required resolution shall include a five-year estimate of PLHA formula allocations, as stated in Appendix B, as the maximum funding amount. The actual amounts may be lower, and the disbursements will be based on the actual allocation amounts. 43 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 5 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA D. Program Administrative, Activity Delivery Costs, and Reimbursement of Costs Predevelopment expenses for construction projects funded by PLHA funds and costs to develop and prepare the PLHA application and Plan may be paid from the PLHA funds regardless of when the costs were incurred. Reimbursement of expenses to prepare the PLHA application and Plan are subject to the cap on administrative costs as detailed in the PLHA Program Guidelines. Other costs incurred more than one year prior to commitment by the Local government may not be paid from the PLHA funds.

E. Application review
An Applicant must submit a complete application and other documents consistent with the deadlines stated in this NOFA. Applications submitted in response to this NOFA must meet the threshold requirements set forth in this section and in PLHA Guidelines Section 302.

F. Threshold requirements for First-Time Applicants
First-time Applicants who have not previously received an award under a prior Local government Formula Allocation NOFA must meet the following threshold requirements:

1. Housing Element Compliance.
a. The housing element of the Applicant and any delegates or subgrantees, if applicable, must have an adopted housing element that has been found by the Department to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, pursuant to Government Code section 65585 at the time of application. Additional information on verifying compliance with this requirement is outlined in Appendix C.
b. If an Applicant is applying on behalf of multiple jurisdictions or delegating or sub granting to another jurisdiction, the funds may only be awarded for use in a locality with an adopted housing element that has been found by the Department to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of Article

10.6 (commencing with section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, pursuant to Government Code section 65585 at the time of application. If the Applicant is not compliant by time of application that will not prevent an award from being made for use in the localities that are determined to be compliant.

2. Annual Progress Report Submittal.
a. The Applicant must have submitted to the Department the Annual Progress Report (APR) on the housing element for the corresponding calendar year based on the allocations for which the Applicant is applying by the application submittal date as follows:
44 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 6 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Allocation Requested: APR Reporting Period:
2021 allocation CY 2021 APR
2022 allocation CY 2022 APR
2023 allocation CY 2023 APR
Additional information on verifying compliance with this requirement is outlined in Appendix C.

3. Application requests an allocation pursuant to Section 200 of the PLHA Guidelines and identifies the eligible activities to be undertaken. Activities must be carried out in the jurisdiction of the Applicant’s Local government. Jointly funded projects may be carried out as described in PLHA Guidelines Section 301(c).
a. At least 40% of the funds requested in the application must be allocated to AOWH activities as defined in Section III(B)(1)(a)(2) above.

4. Submission of the application must be authorized by the governing board of the Applicant by resolution, and this resolution must be submitted as part of the application. The resolution should use the five-year estimate of funding, as listed in Appendix B.
a. The resolution shall certify that, if funds are used for the development of an Affordable Rental Housing Development, the Local government shall make the PLHA assistance in the form of a low-interest, deferred loan to the Sponsor of the Project. The loan shall be evidenced through a Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust, and a Regulatory Agreement shall restrict occupancy and rents in accordance with the Local government-approved underwriting of the Project for a term of at least 55 years. b. If the Local government proposes to allocate funds for any Activity to another entity, the resolution must certify that the Local government’s selection process shall avoid conflicts of interest and shall be accessible to the public.

See PLHA Guidelines Section 302 (c)(3).
c. If the Local government proposes to use funds for the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of for-sale housing projects, or units within forsale housing projects, the resolution must certify that the grantee shall record a deed restriction against the property that will ensure compliance with one of the requirements stated in PLHA Guidelines Section 302(c)(6)(A),(B) or (C).

5. A Five-year Plan which details the following:
a. The manner in which the allocated funds will be used for eligible Activities. 45 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 7 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA b. A detailed description of the way the Local government will prioritize investments that increase the supply of housing for household with incomes at or below 60 percent of the AMI and a detailed description of how the Plan is consistent with the programs set forth in the Local government’s housing element.
c. Evidence that the Plan was authorized and adopted by resolution by the Local government and that the public had an adequate opportunity to review and comment on the Plan’s contents prior to the Plan resolution adoption.

The Plan must be provided to the public for a public comment period, culminating with a public hearing at which the governing board may approve it. The draft Plan should be published for public review on the Applicant’s website.
d. The resolution adopting the Plan should specifically identify the activities the Local government plans to engage in. The resolution is required to be submitted as part of the application. The resolution must specifically state the eligible activities from the Plan application.
e. The following information is required for each proposed Activity:
i. A detailed description of each Activity, pursuant to Section 301, and the percentage of funding being allocated to it. The description must include a minimum of 40 percent directed to Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing (AOWH).
ii. The projected number of households to be served at each income level and a comparison to the unmet share of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation at each income level.
iii. A description of major steps/actions and a proposed schedule required for the implementation and completion of the Activity.
iv. The period of affordability for each Activity. Rental Projects are required to have an affordability period of at least 55 years.
f. The Plan shall be for a term of five years, illustrating how the allocations from 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 will be used. Refer to instructions in the “Plan” tab of the PLHA Application form.

6. If funds are used for acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of for-sale housing projects or units within for-sale housing projects, then a deed restriction shall be recorded against the property as described in Section 302(c)(6)(A-C).

7. If funds are proposed to be used for development of an Affordable Rental Housing Development, a certification is required that the Local government shall make the PLHA assistance in the form of a low-interest, deferred loan to the Sponsor of the Project. The loan must be evidenced through a Promissory Note 46 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 8 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA secured by a Deed of Trust, and a Regulatory Agreement is required to restrict occupancy and rents in accordance with the Local government’s approved underwriting of the Project for a term of at least 55 years. If any activity in the five-year PLHA Plan consists of loans being made to a homebuyer, homeowner, developer or owner of a project, a Program income reuse plan describing how repaid PLHA loans will be used for eligible activities specified in Section 301 must be included in the application. This reuse plan must also describe how interest earned from PLHA funds deposited in a Local government interestbearing account will be used for eligible PLHA activities.

G. Threshold requirements for Previous Grantees
Applicants which have previously received an award of PLHA funds must meet all threshold requirements as outlined in the PLHA Program Guidelines Section 302.

Specifically, prior grantees requesting a new allocation of funds must demonstrate the following:

1. The housing element compliance status of the Applicant and delegates or subgrantees, if applicable, must have adopted a housing element that has been found by the Department to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, pursuant to Government Code section 65585 at the time of application.

2. The Applicant must have submitted to the Department the Annual Progress Report (APR) consistent with the CY allocation being requested as detailed below at the time of application:

Allocation Requested: APR Reporting Period:
2021 allocation CY 2021 APR
2022 allocation CY 2022 APR
2023 allocation CY 2023 APR

3. Applicant must be current on all applicable Annual PLHA required reports at time of award. Annual PLHA reports are due July 31 of each year reporting on the prior calendar year’s activities, per PLHA Guidelines Section 503.

4. Applicant has met commitment and disbursement requirements for previously awarded funds stated in PLHA Guidelines Section 300(e) and must not have incurred any penalties stated in PLHA Guidelines Section 502.

5. Previous grantees will have already received Department approval for their fiveyear PLHA Plan which must include a list of the activities that the Local government plans to provide using the five years of funding contained in the Standard Agreement. In subsequent funding years, the PLHA Plan continues in 47 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 9 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA force and effect unless the Local government amends their Plan. a. If the Local government is proposing that more than 10 percent of the anticipated funds be allocated to a different activity, the Plan must be formally amended, including discussion and approval at a publicly noticed meeting of the Local government’s governing board, and be submitted to the Department for approval.
b. Any amendment proposing to move more than 10 percent of funds that involve moving funds from an AOWH activity (see Section III(B)(1)(a)(ii) above) may only be moved to another AOWH activity.
c. Unless otherwise approved by the Department, all Applicants amending their plan will be required to use 40 percent of each remaining allocation for AOWH activities.

H. Administration and Reporting Requirements
All recipients of PLHA funds must meet the administration and reporting requirements set forth in PLHA Program Guidelines, Article III, Sections 500, 501, and 503.

It is the Applicant’s responsibility to ensure that the application is clear, complete, and accurate. The Department may request additional clarifying information and/or inquire as to where in the application specific information is located. However, missing or forgotten application information or documentation may cause the application not to pass threshold.

IV. Application Webinar
Applicants are strongly encouraged to view the PLHA webinar to gain information critical for preparing the application. The PLHA webinar recording is located on the Department’s PLHA webpage. Any questions on the program should be directed to the Program email at [email protected].

V. Appeals
A. Basis of Appeals

1. Applicants may appeal HCD’s written determination that an application is incomplete, has failed threshold review, or has otherwise been determined to provide insufficient basis for an award (including scoring and tie breaker).

2. At the sole discretion of the Department, the Department’s written determination may include a request for clarifying and/or corrective information.

For purposes of this section, “clarifying information” includes information and/or documentation that resolves ambiguities in any application materials that will inform the Department’s threshold, scoring and feasibility determinations. 48 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 10 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA

3. No Applicant shall have the right to appeal a decision of HCD relating to another Applicant’s application (e.g., eligibility, award).

4. Any request to appeal HCD’s decision regarding an application shall be reviewed for compliance with the Guidelines and this NOFA. All decisions rendered shall be made by the Program Manager or his/her designee. The decision shall be final, binding, and conclusive, and shall constitute the final action of HCD.

5. The appeal process provided herein applies solely to decisions of HCD made pursuant to this NOFA.

B. Appeal Process and Deadlines

1. Process: To file an appeal, Applicants must submit to HCD, by the deadline set forth below, a written appeal which states all relevant facts, arguments, and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Furthermore, the Applicant must provide a detailed reference to the area or areas of the application that provide clarification and substantiation for the basis of the appeal. No new or additional information will be considered if this information would result in a competitive advantage to an Applicant. Once the written appeal is submitted to HCD, no further information or materials will be accepted or considered thereafter.

Appeals are to be submitted to HCD at [email protected] according to the deadline set forth in HCD review letters.

2. Filing Deadline: Appeals must be received by HCD no later than five (5) business days from the date of HCD’s threshold review, or initial score letters, as applicable, representing HCD’s decision made in response to the application.

C. Decision
Any request to appeal HCD’s decision regarding an application shall be reviewed for compliance with the Guidelines and this NOFA. All decisions rendered shall be final, binding, and conclusive, and shall constitute the final action of HCD.

VI. Other terms and conditions
A. Right to modify or suspend
The Department reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to suspend, amend, or modify the provisions of this NOFA at any time, including, without limitation, the amount of funds available hereunder. If such an action occurs, the Department will notify all interested parties and will post the revisions to the Department’s website. 49 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 11 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA B. Disclosure of application
Information provided in the application will become a public record and available for review by the public, pursuant to the California Public Records Act (GC Section 7920.000 et seq.). As such, any materials provided will be disclosed to any person making a request under this Act. The Department cautions Applicants to use discretion in providing information not specifically requested, including, but not limited to, bank account numbers, personal phone numbers, and home addresses.

By providing this information to the Department, the Applicant is waiving any claim of confidentiality and consents to the disclosure of submitted material upon request.

C. Conflicts
In the event of any conflict between the terms of this NOFA and either applicable state or federal law or regulation, the terms of the applicable state or federal law or regulation shall control. Applicants are deemed to have fully read and understand all applicable state and federal laws, and regulations pertaining to PLHA, and understand and agree that the Department shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions in the preparation of this NOFA.
50 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 12 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Appendix A
Entitlement and Non-Entitlement Local Government Formula Allocations Calendar Years 2021, 2022, and 2023.
• Please refer to Section II.A. Eligible Applicants for a discussion of the definition of Entitlement and Non- Entitlement Local governments.
• If no funds are noted for CY 2021 or CY 2022, those funds have already been requested and awarded to the eligible Local government.
• Funds identified in RED are at risk of converting to HCD’s Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) and must be requested through an application submitted no later than February 28, 2025.

Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Alameda $479,024 $367,156 Alpine County $116,768 $57,959 $43,467 Alameda County $800,595 $613,629 Alturas $128,224 $63,112 $48,072 Alhambra $796,443 $399,179 $305,957 Amador City $112,445 $56,885 $43,138 Aliso Viejo $78,309 Amador County $275,316 $135,904 $89,916 Anaheim $3,686,550 $1,847,709 $1,416,205 American Canyon $97,199 $67,623 Antioch $259,046 Anderson $178,480 $90,221 $70,912
Apple Valley $246,524 $188,952 Angels Camp $128,764 $70,091 $54,467 Bakersfield $2,960,656 $1,483,889 $1,137,350 Arcata $107,399 $76,577 Baldwin Park $320,775 Artesia $213,605 $102,568 $79,866 Bellflower $337,495 Arvin $83,886
Berkeley $849,995 Atwater $139,339 $103,072
Buena Park $242,623 Auburn $203,337 $101,762 $79,866
Burbank $313,549 Avenal $80,022 $64,334
Camarillo $88,939 Benicia $88,637
Carlsbad $233,683 $179,110 Biggs $121,739 $62,038 $46,427 Carson $709,383 $355,545 $272,513 Bishop $67,406 $49,716 Cathedral City $484,445 $242,805 $186,101 Blue Lake $117,957 $59,891 $45,513 Cerritos $186,806 $93,627 $71,762 Brawley $86,261
Chico $334,642 $256,491 Butte County $296,625 $189,136
Chino $426,531 $213,778 $163,854 Calaveras County $130,115 Chino Hills $303,241 $151,985 $116,491 Calexico $284,935 $140,413 $104,899 Chula Vista $908,287 $696,170 Calimesa $156,324 $78,680 $55,015 Citrus Heights $268,126 $205,509 Calipatria $59,623 $48,620 Clovis City $313,434 $240,236 Calistoga $73,848 $53,005 51 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 13 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Compton $1,316,582 $659,875 $505,771 Capitola $110,351 $80,414 Concord $836,053 $419,032 $321,173 Carmel-by-the-Sea $69,822 $51,178 Contra Costa County $1,860,477 $1,425,991 Chowchilla $88,879 $64,334 Corona $995,498 $498,946 $382,425 Clearlake $107,130 $86,078 Costa Mesa $904,122 $453,148 $347,322 Coalinga $71,095
Cupertino $141,890 $108,754 Colfax $125,522 $63,380 $47,706 Daly City $438,780 $336,310 Colusa $161,187 $81,900 $56,294 Davis $199,046 Colusa County $152,541 $80,558 $59,218
Delano $556,115 $278,726 $213,634 Corcoran $94,784 $67,623 Downey $889,923 $446,031 $341,868 Corning $150,380 $70,896 $59,401 El Cajon $424,070 Crescent City $56,111
El Centro $161,642 Del Norte County $115,988 $78,039
El Monte $726,377 $556,743 Dinuba $113,304 $82,424
Elk Grove $377,026 $288,977 Dixon $194,691 $92,100 $80,597 Encinitas $133,775 $102,534 Dorris $59,354 $44,600
Escondido $1,441,775 $722,621 $553,864 Dos Palos $143,355 $72,238 $54,467 Fairfield $256,861 Dunsmuir $62,307 $47,889
Fontana $841,109 $644,681 El Centro
(Colonia Only) $102,524
Fountain Valley $123,971 $95,020 El Dorado County $337,874 Fremont $549,661 $421,296 Etna $56,080 $42,919
Fresno $2,921,311 $2,239,084 Eureka $346,539 $167,253 $117,690 Fresno County $1,408,829 $1,079,819 Exeter $78,411 $52,640 Fullerton $1,177,577 $590,205 $452,372 Farmersville $86,463 $64,700 Garden Grove $653,368 Ferndale $121,739 $60,965 $45,148 Gardena $282,801 $216,757 Firebaugh $159,566 $74,922 $56,111 Gilroy $209,401 $160,499 Fort Bragg $75,995 $59,949
Glendale $569,709 Fort Jones $58,281 $44,600
Glendora $85,590 Fortuna $171,995 $83,242 $66,527
Goleta $80,598 $61,776 Fowler $66,064 $50,630
Hanford $253,302 $194,147 Glenn County $201,716 $98,005 $71,643 Hawthorne $402,674 Grass Valley $117,330 $91,560
Hayward $428,245 Greenfield $109,815 $80,049
Hemet $688,525 $345,090 $264,500 Gridley $143,895 $73,848 $51,543 Hesperia $865,117 $433,599 $332,338 Grover Beach $73,836 Huntington Beach $938,184 $470,220 $360,407 Guadalupe $166,051 $78,680 $55,198 52 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 14 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Huntington Park $428,208 Gustine $73,848 $60,497
Indio $779,909 $390,892 $299,605 Hidden Hills $124,982 $62,844 $46,975 Inglewood $483,467 Hollister $147,123 $110,381
Irvine $498,055 Holtville $61,770 $45,148
Kern County $3,695,204 $1,852,046 $1,419,530 Humboldt County $207,408 La Habra $333,372 $255,518 Huron $67,138 $50,264
La Mesa $124,064 Imperial $72,922
Laguna Niguel $100,806 Imperial County $311,954 $161,080 $109,102 Lake Elsinore $425,098 $213,060 $163,303 Indian Wells $163,889 $78,948 $59,035 Lake Forest $145,261 Industry $110,824 $55,865 $43,138
Lakewood $177,970 Inyo County $109,009 $78,769
Lancaster $595,694 $456,579 Ione $141,734 $70,359 $57,939 Livermore $137,029 Jackson $143,355 $73,311 $51,909
Lodi $288,277 $220,955 King City $60,131
Lompoc $388,324 $194,629 $149,176 Kings County $148,733 $110,016 Long Beach $1,923,146 Lake County $213,687 $152,225
Los Angeles $22,477,835 $17,228,487 Lakeport $77,874 $54,102 Los Angeles County $9,451,755 $7,244,444 Lassen County $70,912 Lynwood $1,079,969 $541,283 $414,875 Lemoore $237,381 $130,213 $89,002 Madera $362,050 $277,499 Lincoln $344,377 $164,032 $116,045 Marin County $622,026 $476,762 Lindsay $89,953 $65,430
Menifee $165,325 Live Oak $156,324 $77,606 $59,035
Merced $444,694 $340,842 Livingston $93,442 $67,989
Milpitas $204,545 $156,777 Loomis $147,678 $78,411 $65,248 Mission Viejo $135,808 Los Banos $131,824 $103,620
Modesto $831,356 $637,206 Loyalton $116,336 $58,012 $43,869 Montebello $208,137 Madera County $241,065 $187,126
Monterey $99,805 $76,497 Mammoth Lakes $74,922 $62,141
Monterey County $555,851 $426,041 Maricopa $116,336 $58,549 $46,610 Monterey Park $273,366 $209,525 Marina $112,230 $81,510 Moreno Valley $1,761,457 $882,847 $676,672 Mariposa County $87,540 Mountain View $219,939 $168,576 Marysville $66,892
Napa $272,799 $209,091 McFarland $90,758 $65,248
National City $337,079 $258,360 Mendocino County $293,672 $203,608 Newport Beach $111,450 Merced County $335,007 $233,721
53 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 15 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Norwalk $389,495 Modoc County $146,597 $68,480 $51,361
Oakland $3,175,817 $2,434,155 Mono County $57,573
Oceanside $426,547 Montague $60,965 $44,600
Ontario $788,724 $604,530 Mount Shasta $74,117 $55,746
Orange $399,168 Napa County $261,158 $128,335 $94,849
Orange County $2,175,998 $1,090,616 $835,919 Nevada City $70,896 $53,919 Oxnard $761,186 Nevada County $281,594 $192,790
Palm Desert $112,562 Orange Cove $70,896 $54,102
Palm Springs $328,816 $164,803 $126,316 Orland $143,355 $78,680 $64,517 Palmdale $1,332,565 $667,885 $511,911 Oroville $83,338
Palo Alto $198,460 $152,112 Pacific Grove $99,615 $74,567 Paradise $80,239 $61,500 Palos Verdes
Estates $170,914 $87,805 $65,796
Paramount $287,932 Parlier $87,805 $68,354
Pasadena $615,081 Pismo Beach $93,442 $69,268
Perris City $797,990 $399,954 $306,551 Placer County $385,467 $247,060 Petaluma $121,138 Placerville $101,494 $69,268
Pico Rivera $222,734 Plumas County $217,387 $104,983 $76,029 Pittsburg $543,387 $272,347 $208,744 Plymouth $116,876 $58,549 $44,783 Placentia $141,124 Point Arena $56,670 $43,101
Pleasanton $129,527 $99,278 Portola $120,659 $62,038 $47,158 Pomona $915,970 $702,059 Rancho Mirage $103,803
Porterville $293,840 $225,218 Red Bluff $100,152 $69,085 Rancho Cordova $244,642 $187,510 Rio Dell $141,193 $72,506 $55,563 Rancho Cucamonga $386,189 $296,001 Rio Vista $157,945 $87,537 $61,411 Rancho Santa
Margarita $173,436 $86,926 $66,626 Riverbank $113,572 $79,135 Redding $221,315 San Benito County $112,767 $76,942
Redondo Beach $112,160 $85,966 San Joaquin $128,764 $65,528 $49,716 Redwood City $228,481 San Juan Bautista $63,917 $48,437 Rialto $1,022,495 $512,477 $392,796 San Juan
Capistrano $154,638 $108,371
Riverside $1,390,635 $1,065,874 Sand City $56,885 $43,284 Riverside County $6,835,329 $3,425,886 $2,625,824 Santa Cruz County $480,214 $332,575 Rocklin $88,469 Scotts Valley $76,211
Rosemead $294,255 $225,536 Shasta County $267,637 $190,232 Roseville $205,908 Shasta Lake $68,354
54 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 16 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Sacramento $1,548,793 Sierra County $124,441 $63,649 $51,361 Sacramento County $2,332,543 $1,787,814 Siskiyou County $127,046 $85,384 Salinas $863,162 $661,584 Solano County $82,789
San Bernardino $1,065,809 Soledad $94,247 $65,065
San Bernardino
County $2,965,495 $2,272,949 Sonora $76,801 $53,736
San Buenaventura $234,868 South Lake Tahoe $117,142
San Clemente $124,215 Saint Helena $81,364 $63,969
San Diego $3,804,642 Suisun City $257,916 $124,040 $85,165 San Diego County $1,697,409 $1,301,006 Susanville $76,801 $59,583 San Francisco $7,473,904 $5,728,490 Sutter County $111,157 $76,942 San Joaquin County $1,123,219 $860,908 Sutter Creek $128,764 $64,991 $52,092 San Jose $3,728,060 $2,857,429 Taft $136,330 $72,775 $58,487 San Leandro $300,018 $229,953 Tehama $56,348 $43,467
San Luis Obispo
County $747,989 $573,308 Tehama County $212,668 $148,059 San Marcos $209,727 Trinidad $111,256 $55,865 $42,773
San Mateo $224,653 Trinity County $82,607
San Mateo County $1,036,938 $794,777 Truckee $96,126 $68,354 Santa Ana $1,842,273 Tulare County $486,656 $711,731
Santa Barbara $388,447 $297,731 Tulelake $58,549 $45,148 Santa Barbara
County $374,398 Tuolumne County $228,987 $161,727
Santa Clara $411,064 $315,066 Ukiah $100,152 $70,547
Santa Clara County $631,595 $484,096 Vernon $111,472 $55,865 $43,503 Santa Clarita $1,006,200 $504,310 $386,536 Wasco $84,069 Santa Cruz $173,959 Weed $65,528 $48,437
Santa Maria $481,953 Westmorland $117,957 $59,086 $44,234 Santa Monica $469,381 $359,765 Wheatland $123,361 $62,575 $47,158 Santa Rosa $456,230 Williams $135,249 $64,186 $48,437
Santee $229,843 $115,198 $88,295 Willits $69,017 $50,630 Seaside $165,564 $126,899 Willows $138,491 $74,653 $59,766 Simi Valley $190,789 Winters $177,399 $86,195 $59,401
Sonoma County $771,043 $590,977 Woodlake $75,995 $57,208 South Gate $1,233,796 $618,382 $473,968 Yolo County $395,616 South San Francisco $186,873 $143,232 Yountville $64,722 $53,371 Stanislaus County $1,975,561 $990,157 $758,921 Yreka $79,216 $56,111 55 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 17 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Local Government CY 2021 CY 2022 CY 2023 Stockton $1,467,196 $1,124,555 Yuba County $188,770
Sunnyvale $456,956 $350,241 No data No data No data No data Temecula $467,631 $234,378 $179,642 No data No data No data No data Thousand Oaks $506,368 $253,793 $194,523 No data No data No data No data Torrance $291,992 No data No data No data No data
Tulare $272,990 $209,238 No data No data No data No data Turlock $265,636 $203,601 No data No data No data No data Tustin $253,336 No data No data No data No data
Union City $166,857 No data No data No data No data
Upland $475,232 $238,187 $182,562 No data No data No data No data Vacaville $206,179 $158,029 No data No data No data No data Vallejo $433,249 $332,070 No data No data No data No data Ventura County $737,056 $564,928 No data No data No data No data Victorville $542,468 $415,783 No data No data No data No data Visalia $1,078,990 $540,793 $414,499 No data No data No data No data Vista $268,670 No data No data No data No data
Walnut Creek $90,972 No data No data No data No data
Watsonville $310,781 $238,203 No data No data No data No data West Covina $664,967 $333,283 $255,450 No data No data No data No data West Sacramento $404,832 $202,903 $155,518 No data No data No data No data Westminster $873,327 $437,714 $335,493 No data No data No data No data Whittier $328,505 $251,788 No data No data No data No data Woodland $163,607 No data No data No data No data
Yorba Linda $69,999 No data No data No data No data
Yuba City $204,445 No data No data No data No data
56 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 18 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Appendix B
Five-Year PLHA Allocation Estimate
Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government Estimated
5-Year
Funding Amount
Local Government Estimated
5-Year Funding
Amount
Alameda $3,352,590 Alpine County $408,390
Alhambra $2,793,768 Alturas $475,835
Aliso Viejo $715,062 Amador City $395,168
Anaheim $12,931,710 Amador County $805,115
Antioch $2,365,410 American Canyon $704,612
Apple Valley $1,725,366 Anderson $622,622
Bakersfield $10,385,412 Angels Camp $487,737
Baldwin Park $2,929,068 Arcata $1,056,372
Bellflower $3,081,744 Artesia $814,372
Berkeley $7,761,504 Arvin $831,563
Buena Park $2,215,452 Atwater $949,257
Burbank $2,863,092 Auburn $719,158
Camarillo $812,124 Avenal $627,912
Carlsbad $1,635,492 Benicia $848,754
Carson $2,488,380 Biggs $424,261
Cathedral City $1,699,338 Bishop $502,283
Cerritos $655,278 Blue Lake $409,715
Chico $2,342,088 Brawley $906,940
Chino $1,496,190 Butte County $2,000,572
Chino Hills $1,063,710 Calaveras County $1,238,865
Chula Vista $6,356,898 Calexico $1,222,996
Citrus Heights $1,876,554 Calimesa $532,699
Clovis City $2,193,654 Calipatria $462,611
Compton $4,618,320 Calistoga $511,540
Concord $2,932,710 Capitola $630,557
Corona $3,492,018 Carmel-by-the-Sea $491,704
Costa Mesa $3,171,486 Chowchilla $662,295
Cupertino $993,060 Clearlake $875,203
Daly City $3,070,926 Coalinga $618,655
Davis $1,817,544 Colfax $432,196
Delano $1,950,744 Colusa $515,507
Downey $3,121,674 Colusa County $500,961
El Cajon $3,872,292 Corcoran $683,453
El Centro $1,475,988 Corning $555,180
Elk Grove $2,638,722 Crescent City $485,092
El Monte $5,083,752 Del Norte County $844,787
57 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 19 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government Estimated 5-Year
Funding Amount
Local Government Estimated 5-Year
Funding Amount
Encinitas $936,264 Dinuba $889,749
Escondido $5,057,466 Dixon $692,710
Fairfield $2,345,460 Dorris $399,135
Fontana $5,886,732 Dos Palos $496,994
Fountain Valley $867,648 Dunsmuir $432,196
Fremont $3,846,960 El Centro $1,297,051
Fresno $20,445,618 El Dorado County $2,879,974
Fullerton $4,130,712 Etna $403,103
Gardena $1,979,262 Eureka $1,125,138
Garden Grove $5,966,058 Exeter $586,917
Gilroy $1,465,554 Farmersville $589,562
Glendale $5,202,150 Ferndale $426,906
Glendora $781,548 Firebaugh $572,371
Goleta $564,090 Fort Bragg $641,136
Hanford $1,772,808 Fort Jones $415,004
Hawthorne $3,676,914 Fortuna $651,715
Hayward $3,910,410 Fowler $486,414
Hemet $2,415,216 Glenn County $641,136
Hesperia $3,034,662 Grass Valley $813,049
Huntington Beach $3,290,970 Greenfield $839,497
Huntington Park $3,910,068 Gridley $555,180
Indio $2,735,772 Grover Beach $727,093
Inglewood $4,414,656 Guadalupe $606,754
Irvine $4,547,862 Gustine $441,452
Laguna Niguel $920,484 Hidden Hills $428,228
La Habra $2,333,202 Hollister $1,081,498
Lake Forest $1,326,420 Holtville $495,671
Lake Elsinore $1,491,162 Humboldt County $2,066,693
Lakewood $1,625,082 Huron $597,497
La Mesa $1,132,854 Imperial $548,568
Lancaster $4,169,130 Imperial County $1,043,148
Livermore $1,251,240 Indian Wells $532,699
Lodi $2,017,590 Industry $393,581
Lompoc $1,362,162 Inyo County $622,622
Long Beach $17,560,704 Ione $452,032
Los Angeles $157,317,438 Jackson $524,764
Lynwood $3,788,322 King City $805,115
Madera $2,533,914 Kings County $980,995
Menifee $1,509,624 Lake County $1,450,450
Merced $3,112,314 Lakeport $475,835
Milpitas $1,431,570 Lassen County $612,043
Mission Viejo $1,240,098 Lemoore $871,235
58 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 20 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government Estimated 5-Year
Funding Amount
Local Government Estimated 5-Year
Funding Amount
Modesto $5,818,482 Lincoln $1,219,029
Montebello $1,900,548 Lindsay $703,289
Monterey $698,514 Live Oak $537,988
Monterey Park $1,913,226 Livingston $653,038
Moreno Valley $6,178,854 Loomis $490,382
Mountain View $1,539,306 Los Banos $1,129,105
Napa $1,909,260 Loyalton $405,747
National City $2,359,146 Madera County $1,643,522
Newport Beach $1,017,678 Mammoth Lakes $490,382
Norwalk $3,556,572 Maricopa $400,458
Oakland $22,226,850 Marina $945,290
Oceanside $3,894,906 Mariposa County $770,732
Ontario $5,520,108 Marysville $662,295
Orange $3,644,898 McFarland $676,841
Oxnard $6,950,574 Mendocino County $2,099,753
Palmdale $4,674,384 Merced County $1,865,687
Palm Desert $1,027,836 Modoc County $458,644
Palm Springs $1,153,422 Mono County $462,611
Palo Alto $1,388,976 Montague $412,359
Paradise $561,576 Mount Shasta $539,311
Paramount $2,629,182 Napa County $859,334
Pasadena $5,616,456 Nevada City $473,190
Perris City $2,799,192 Nevada County $1,837,916
Petaluma $1,106,142 Orange Cove $608,076
Pico Rivera $2,033,838 Orland $555,180
Pittsburg $1,906,098 Oroville $822,306
Placentia $1,288,644 Pacific Grove $712,546
Pleasanton $906,534 Palos Verdes Estates $580,305
Pomona $6,410,670 Parlier $801,148
Porterville $2,056,524 Pismo Beach $597,497
Rancho Cordova $1,712,196 Placer County $2,730,542
Rancho Cucamonga $2,702,856 Placerville $664,940
Rancho Santa Margarita $608,376 Plumas County $727,093
Redding $2,020,884 Plymouth $404,425
Redondo Beach $784,980 Point Arena $404,425
Redwood City $2,086,314 Portola $452,032
Rialto $3,586,716 Rancho Mirage $1,032,569
Riverside $9,732,750 Red Bluff $744,284
Rocklin $807,828 Rio Dell $474,513
59 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 21 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments Non-Entitlement Local Governments Local Government Estimated 5-Year
Funding Amount
Local Government Estimated 5-Year
Funding Amount
Salinas $6,041,082 San Joaquin $471,868
Roseville $1,880,196 Riverbank $732,382
Sacramento $14,142,402 San Benito County $727,093
Salinas $6,041,082 San Joaquin $471,868
San Bernardino $9,732,162 San Juan Bautista $455,999
San Clemente $1,134,240 San Juan Capistrano $1,418,712
San Diego $34,741,098 Sand City $402,838
San Francisco $52,308,210 Santa Cruz County $3,395,713
San Jose $26,091,876 Scotts Valley $622,622
San Leandro $2,099,760 Shasta County $1,721,544
San Marcos $1,915,068 Shasta Lake $613,366
San Mateo $2,051,364 Sierra County $405,747
Santa Ana $16,822,236 Siskiyou County $852,722
Santa Barbara $2,718,654 Solano County $769,410
Santa Clara $2,876,946 Soledad $725,770
Santa Clarita $3,529,554 Sonora $548,568
Santa Cruz $1,588,464 South Lake Tahoe $994,219
Santa Maria $4,400,826 Saint Helena $534,021
Santa Monica $3,285,096 Suisun City $928,099
Santa Rosa $4,165,950 Susanville $559,147
Santee $806,244 Sutter County $698,000
Seaside $1,158,744 Sutter Creek $471,868
Simi Valley $1,742,142 Taft $543,278
South Gate $4,327,920 Tehama $393,581
South San Francisco $1,307,880 Tehama County $1,120,113 Stockton $10,268,580 Trinidad $396,491
Sunnyvale $3,198,138 Trinity County $729,738
Temecula $1,640,358 Truckee $627,912
Thousand Oaks $1,776,240 Tulare County $3,501,506
Torrance $2,666,244 Tulelake $411,037
Tulare $1,910,598 Tuolumne County $1,453,095
Turlock $1,859,124 Ukiah $778,667
Tustin $2,313,270 Vernon $392,259
Union City $1,523,610 Wasco $813,049
Upland $1,667,022 Weed $459,966
Vacaville $1,443,000 Westmorland $436,163
Vallejo $3,032,214 Wheatland $432,196
San Buenaventura $2,144,634 Williams $485,092
Victorville $3,796,620 Willits $553,857
Visalia $3,784,890 Willows $561,792
Vista $2,453,292 Winters $532,699
60 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 22 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Entitlement Local Governments
Local Government Estimate 5-Year
Funding Amount
Walnut Creek $830,694
Watsonville $2,175,090
West Covina $2,332,578
Westminster $3,063,462
West Sacramento $1,420,074
Whittier $2,299,140
Woodland $1,493,934
Yorba Linda $639,174
Yuba City $1,866,840
Alameda County $5,603,190
Contra Costa County $13,021,068
Fresno County $9,860,088
Kern County $12,962,064
Los Angeles County $66,150,756
Marin County $4,353,426
Monterey County $3,890,280
Orange County $7,632,984
Riverside County $23,977,026
Sacramento County $16,324,956
San Bernardino County $20,754,846
San Diego County $11,879,796
San Joaquin County $7,861,158
San Luis Obispo County $5,235,012
San Mateo County $7,257,300
Santa Barbara County $3,418,722
Santa Clara County $4,420,398
Sonoma County $5,396,358
Stanislaus County $6,929,892
Ventura County $5,158,494
61 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 23 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Appendix C
Housing Element and Annual Progress Report (APR) Compliance Status Housing element and Annual Progress Report (APR) compliance is a threshold requirement for PLHA.

The housing element and APR compliance status of the Applicant and delegates or subgrantees, if applicable, must be established prior to submittal of the application.

If an Applicant is applying on behalf of multiple jurisdictions or delegating or sub-granting to another entity, the funds may only be awarded for use in a locality that is compliant with its APR requirements and which has an adopted housing element that has been found by the Department to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, pursuant to Government Code section 65585 at the time of award. If the Applicant is not compliant by time of application that will not prevent an award from being made for use in the localities that have been compliant.

Please note, if PLHA awards are made within 120 days of the housing element due date, the Department may refer to the jurisdiction’s compliance from the prior cycle.

To verify current housing element and APR compliance status, please consult the following resources:

Housing Element Compliance: Housing Element Review and Compliance Report | California Department of Housing and Community Development
Annual Progress Report Submittal: Annual Progress Reports - Data Dashboard and Downloads | California Department of Housing and Community Development Please note that PLHA is an over-the-counter (OTC) program, allowing Applicants to apply at any point during the OTC application window. If a jurisdiction is currently out of compliance, that jurisdiction, may still apply and once it reaches compliance with the housing element and APR requirements, it will be eligible to apply for PLHA funds.

However, if a Local government is requesting CY 2021 funds, they must apply no later than February 28, 2025, and demonstrate they have met all threshold requirements, including housing element compliance and APR submittal requirements by no later than at the time of application submittal to avoid reversion.

For questions about Housing Element Compliance, please email [email protected]. For inquiries on the status of APR submittal, please email [email protected].
62 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 24 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Appendix D
Urban County Jurisdictions
The jurisdictions listed below are not eligible to receive a direct allocation of PLHA funds though they can still benefit from the Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program funds based upon an application through their designated Urban County.

An Urban County may apply on the behalf of the Local governments listed below, and the Urban County’s allocation can provide funding for eligible activities within the boundaries of these Local governments, as well as the unincorporated area of the designated Urban County.

If an Urban County is applying on behalf of multiple jurisdictions, the funds may only be awarded for use in localities that are compliant with their APR and housing element requirements as detailed in Appendix C. A locality is compliant with its housing element requirements when it has an adopted housing element that has been found by the Department to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, pursuant to Government Code section 65585 at the time of award. If the Urban County is not compliant by time of award that will not prevent an award from being made for use in the localities that are compliant.

Local Government Urban County that can apply on
the jurisdiction’s behalf
Adelanto San Bernardino County
Agoura Hills Los Angeles County
Albany Alameda County
Arcadia Los Angeles County
Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo County
Atascadero San Luis Obispo County
Atherton San Mateo County
Avalon Los Angeles County
Azusa Los Angeles County
Banning Riverside County
Barstow San Bernardino County
Beaumont Riverside County
Bell Los Angeles County
Bell Gardens Los Angeles County
Belmont San Mateo County
Belvedere Marin County
Beverly Hills Los Angeles County
Big Bear Lake San Bernardino County
Blythe Riverside County
63 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 25 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Bradbury Los Angeles County
Brea Orange County
Brentwood Contra Costa County
Brisbane San Mateo County
Buellton Santa Barbara County
Burlingame San Mateo County
Calabasas Los Angeles County
California City Kern County
Campbell Santa Clara County
Canyon Lake Riverside County
Carpinteria Santa Barbara County
Ceres Stanislaus County
Claremont Los Angeles County
Clayton Contra Costa County
Cloverdale Sonoma County
Coachella Riverside County
Colma San Mateo County
Colton San Bernardino County
Commerce Los Angeles County
Coronado San Diego County
Corte Madera Marin County
Cotati Sonoma County
Covina Los Angeles County
Cudahy Los Angeles County
Culver City Los Angeles County
Cypress Orange County
Dana Point Orange County
Danville Contra Costa County
Del Mar San Diego County
Del Rey Oaks Monterey County
Desert Hot Springs Riverside County
Diamond Bar Los Angeles County
Duarte Los Angeles County
Dublin Alameda County
East Palo Alto San Mateo County
Eastvale Riverside County
El Cerrito Contra Costa County
El Segundo Los Angeles County
Emeryville Alameda County
Escalon San Joaquin County
Fairfax Marin County
Fillmore Ventura County
Folsom Sacramento County
64 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 26 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Foster City San Mateo County
Galt Sacramento County
Gonzales Monterey County
Grand Terrace San Bernardino County
Half Moon Bay San Mateo County
Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles County
Healdsburg Sonoma County
Hercules Contra Costa County
Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County
Highland San Bernardino County
Hillsborough San Mateo County
Hughson Stanislaus County
Imperial Beach San Diego County
Irwindale Los Angeles County
Isleton Sacramento County
Jurupa Valley Riverside County
Kerman Fresno County
Kingsburg Fresno County
La Canada Flintridge Los Angeles County
La Habra Heights Los Angeles County
La Mirada Los Angeles County
La Palma Orange County
La Puente Los Angeles County
La Quinta Riverside County
La Verne Los Angeles County
Lafayette Contra Costa County
Laguna Beach Orange County
Laguna Hills Orange County
Laguna Woods Orange County
Larkspur Marin County
Lathrop San Joaquin County
Lawndale Los Angeles County
Lemon Grove San Diego County
Loma Linda San Bernardino County
Lomita Los Angeles County
Los Alamitos Orange County
Los Altos Santa Clara County
Los Altos Hills Santa Clara County
Los Gatos Santa Clara County
Malibu Los Angeles County
Manhattan Beach Los Angeles County
Manteca San Joaquin County
Martinez Contra Costa County
65 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 27 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA Maywood Los Angeles County
Mendota Fresno County
Menlo Park San Mateo County
Mill Valley Marin County
Millbrae San Mateo County
Monrovia Los Angeles County
Montclair San Bernardino County
Monte Sereno Santa Clara County
Moorpark Ventura County
Moraga Contra Costa County
Morgan Hill Santa Clara County
Morro Bay San Luis Obispo County
Murrieta Riverside County
Needles San Bernardino County
Newark Alameda County
Newman Stanislaus County
Norco Riverside County
Novato Marin County
Oakdale Stanislaus County
Oakley Contra Costa County
Ojai Ventura County
Orinda Contra Costa County
Pacifica San Mateo County
Paso Robles San Luis Obispo County
Patterson Stanislaus County
Piedmont Alameda County
Pinole Contra Costa County
Pleasant Hill Contra Costa County
Port Hueneme Ventura County
Portola Valley San Mateo County
Poway San Diego County
Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles County
Redlands San Bernardino County
Reedley Fresno County
Richmond Contra Costa County
Ridgecrest Kern County
Ripon San Joaquin County
Rohnert Park Sonoma County
Rolling Hills Los Angeles County
Rolling Hills Estates Los Angeles County
Ross Marin County
San Anselmo Marin County
San Bruno San Mateo County
66 California Department of Housing and Community Development Page 28 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program – CY 2023 Formula Allocation NOFA San Carlos San Mateo County
San Dimas Los Angeles County
San Fernando Los Angeles County
San Gabriel Los Angeles County
San Jacinto Riverside County
San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo County
San Marino Los Angeles County
San Pablo Contra Costa County
San Rafael Marin County
San Ramon Contra Costa County
Sanger Fresno County
Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles County
Santa Paula Ventura County
Saratoga Santa Clara County
Sausalito Marin County
Seal Beach Orange County
Sebastopol Sonoma County
Selma Fresno County
Shafter Kern County
Sierra Madre Los Angeles County
Signal Hill Los Angeles County
Solana Beach San Diego County
Solvang Santa Barbara County
Sonoma Sonoma County
South El Monte Los Angeles County
South Pasadena Los Angeles County
Stanton Orange County
Tehachapi Kern County
Temple City Los Angeles County
Tiburon Marin County
Tracy San Joaquin County
Twentynine Palms San Bernardino County
Villa Park Orange County
Walnut Los Angeles County
Waterford Stanislaus County
West Hollywood Los Angeles County
Westlake Village Los Angeles County
Wildomar Riverside County
Windsor Sonoma County
Woodside San Mateo County
Yucaipa San Bernardino County
Yucca Valley San Bernardino County
67 68
69 City of Visalia FY 2025/2026 - FY 2029/2030 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Survey What is your involvement in the City of Visalia?
Answered: 91 Skipped: 0
None of the above.

I work for an organization affilated with the City of Visalia.

I work or own a business in the City of Visalia.

I am a City of Visalia resident.
0 50 100
I am a City of Visalia resident. 68 74.73%
I work or own a business in the City of Visalia. 27 29.67% I work for an organization affilated with the City of Visalia. 15 16.48% None of the above. 2 2.2%
In what area of the City do you live in?
I do not live in the City of Visalia
Southwest Visalia
Southeast Visalia
Northwest Visalia
Northeast Visalia
Washington
Shannon
Oval
Mooney Blvd.

Downtown
0 5 10 15 20
Downtown 4 4.4%
Mooney Blvd. 11 12.09%
Answers Count Percentage
Answers Count Percentage
70 Answered: 89 Skipped: 2
Oval 0 0%
Shannon Ranch 3 3.3%
Washington 2 2.2%
Northeast Visalia 12 13.19%
Northwest Visalia 15 16.48%
Southeast Visalia 16 17.58%
Southwest Visalia 11 12.09%
I do not live in the City of Visalia 15 16.48%
What is your living situation?
Answered: 91 Skipped: 0
Homeless
Living with others
Renter
Homeowner
0 20 40 60 80
Homeowner 62 68.13%
Renter 22 24.18%
Living with others 9 9.89%
Homeless 1 1.1%
What is your race/ethnicity?
Native American or Native Alaskan
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
Asian
Other
Hispanic or Latino
White or Caucasian
0 20 40 60
Answers Count Percentage
71 Answered: 88 Skipped: 3
White or Caucasian 44 48.35%
Hispanic or Latino 39 42.86%
Other 4 4.4%
Asian 3 3.3%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 3 3.3%
Black or African American 2 2.2%
Native American or Native Alaskan 1 1.1%
Which target population in Visalia do you feel is most in need of housing resources? Answered: 90 Skipped: 1
Other
Farmworkers
Persons with Disabilities
Unaccompanied Youth 18-24
Domestic Violence Victims
Senior Citizens
At-risk of Homelessness
Homeless
0 20 40 60
Homeless 56 61.54%
At-risk of Homelessness 57 62.64%
Senior Citizens 37 40.66%
Domestic Violence Victims 24 26.37%
Unaccompanied Youth 18-24 39 42.86%
Persons with Disabilities 24 26.37%
Farmworkers 17 18.68%
Other 10 10.99%
Below is a list of project types eligible for PLHA funding. Which do you feel are the most need… Answers Count Percentage
Answers Count Percentage
72 Answered: 91 Skipped: 0
Accessibility Housing Modifications
Accessory Dwelling Units
Rapid Rehousing Services
Rehabilitate Foreclosed or Vacant Homes
Homeownership Assistance
Transitional Housing
Permanent Supportive Housing
Emergency Shelter
Rental
Affordable Rental Housing
0 20 40 60 80
Affordable Rental Housing 67 73.63%
Rental Assistance 39 42.86%
Emergency Shelter 37 40.66%
Permanent Supportive Housing 36 39.56%
Transitional Housing 36 39.56%
Homeownership Assistance 28 30.77%
Rehabilitate Foreclosed or Vacant Homes 26 28.57%
Rapid Rehousing Services 24 26.37%
Accessory Dwelling Units 10 10.99%
Accessibility Housing Modifications 6 6.59%
What type of housing do you feel are the most needed in the City of Visalia? Answers Count Percentage
73 Answered: 91 Skipped: 0
Other
Farmworker Housing
Rental Rehabilitation
Homeowner Rehabilitation
Housing for Disabled
First-Time Homebuyer Assistance
Senior Housing
Aged Out Foster Youth
Homeless
Affordable Rental Housing
0 20 40 60 80
Affordable Rental Housing 64 70.33%
Homeless 42 46.15%
Aged Out Foster Youth 37 40.66%
Senior Housing 31 34.07%
First-Time Homebuyer Assistance 29 31.87%
Housing for Disabled 19 20.88%
Homeowner Rehabilitation 16 17.58%
Rental Rehabilitation 12 13.19%
Farmworker Housing 11 12.09%
Other 5 5.49%
How would you prefer to received information from the City? Other
Information mailed to your home
Public Meeting
Newspaper
Email
City Social Media Pages
City Website
0 20 40 60
Answers Count Percentage
74 Answered: 89 Skipped: 2
City Website 29 31.87%
City Social Media Pages 40 43.96%
Email 42 46.15%
Newspaper 10 10.99%
Public Meeting 14 15.38%
Information mailed to your home 17 18.68%
Other 1 1.1%
Comments for the City of Visalia.
housing
affordable
city
Homeless Visalia
rental
community
large
people
increased
cost
real
low
shelter
families
homeless.
time
housing.
income
homes
city.
growing
move
rent
2 living
major
target
unhoused
individuals. walk-in
barrier
requires
referral
organization.
experiencing
lots
risk
homelessness
Veterans
hard
bad
credit
Utilizing
manufactured
houses
add
number
units
quickly
lower
cost.

Tulare
diverse
stock
programs
aimed
groups.
farmworkers
income-stressed
renters
prospective
1st
homeowners
aged-out
foster
youth
members
longer Medium
single
mothers.
rents
100%
year.

Place
low-income nicer
areas
resources
Visalia.
population
everyday.
access
assistance
treatment
centers
co-occuring
disorders
allowing
resident
input.

Support
formed
network
incorporating
membership
local
organizations
address
needs.

Council
quarterly
town
halls
discuss
future
projects
gather
input
finding
solutions.
time.
home
buying
3x
rent.
managed
apartments
entry
level
made
available.
sffordable
modest
comp apartmentlexes
renovated
current
tenants
30%. increases
Love
doing. government It’s
stays
late
let’s
build
rid
streets
people.
expensive
young
adults
own.
destroying
Stop
helping
stay
fellow
Visalians
renter
infinitely
dealing
rising
costs
scale
estate
companies
buy
property
gut
lot
gave
&
jacked
$300
yrs.
towns
housing 8
affordable 6
city 5
Homeless 5
Visalia 4
rental 4
community 4
large 3
people 3
increased 2
cost 2
real 2
low 2
shelter 2
families 2
homeless. 2
Answers Count Percentage
Word Count
75 time
2 housing.2
income2
homes2
city. 2
growing2
move2
rent2
21 living1
major1
target1
unhoused1
individuals.1
walk-in1
barrier1
requires1
referral1
organization.1
experiencing1
lots1
risk1
homelessness1
Veterans1
hard1
bad1
credit1
Utilizing1
manufactured1
houses1
add1
number1
units1
quickly1
lower1
cost.1
76 Tulare
1 diverse1
stock1
programs1
aimed1
groups.1
farmworkers1
income-stressed1
renters1
prospective1
1st1
homeowners1
aged-out1
foster1
youth1
members1
longer1
Medium1
single1
mothers.1
rents1
100%1
year. 1
Place1
low-income1
nicer1
areas1
resources1
Visalia.1
population1
everyday. 1
access1
assistance1
treatment1
centers1
co-occuring1
77 disorders
1 allowing1
resident1
input.1
Support1
formed1
network1
incorporating1
membership1
local1
organizations1
address1
needs.1
Council1
quarterly1
town1
halls1
discuss1
future1
projects1
gather1
input1
finding1
solutions.1
time.1
home1
buying1
3x1
rent.1
managed1
apartments1
entry1
level1
made1
available.1
sffordable1
78 modest
1 apartment1
complexes1
renovated1
current1
tenants1
increases1
30%.1
Love1
doing.1
It’s1
government1
stays1
late1
let’s1
build1
rid1
streets1
people.1
expensive1
young1
adults1
own.1
destroying1
Stop1
helping1
stay1
fellow1
Visalians1
renter1
infinitely1
dealing1
rising1
costs1
scale1
estate1
79 Answered: 24 Skipped: 67
companies 1
buy 1
property 1
gut 1
lot 1
services 1
previous 1
company 1
gave 1
& 1
jacked 1
$300 1
yrs. 1
surrounding 1
smaller 1
towns 1
options 1
subsidized 1
80 Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual CDBG Allocation $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 6,000,000 Program Income 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Prior Year Resources 400,000 - - 400,000
Total CDBG Resources $ 1,700,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 6,900,000 Administration (20%) $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,200,000 Public Services (15%) 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 900,000 Single-Family Home Repair Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Senior Mobile Home Repair Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Code Enforcement Low-Mod Income Areas 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 875,000 Emergency Shelter Development 905,000 505,000 - - - 1,410,000 Sidewalk ADA Improvements - - 505,000 355,000 505,000 1,365,000 Park Youth Improvements - - - 150,000 - 150,000
Total CDBG Expenditures $ 1,700,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 6,900,000 Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual HOME Allocation $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,500,000 Program Income 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total HOME Resources $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 3,500,000 HOME Administration (10%) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Rancho Colegio Project 289,000 - - - - 289,000
Senior Housing Project 361,000 550,000 375,000 - - 1,286,000 Affordable Rental Housing Project - - 175,000 550,000 550,000 1,275,000 Tenant-Based Rental Assistance - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Total HOME Expenditures $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 3,500,000 Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual PLHA Allocation $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,075,000 Prior Year Resources 165,800 - - - - 165,800
Total PLHA Resources $ 580,800 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,240,800 PLHA Administration (5%) $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 103,750 AOWH - Homeownership Activities (40%) 331,800 166,000 166,000 166,000 166,000 995,800 Emergency Shelter (19%) - - 76,250 76,250 76,250 228,750 Warming Center (19%) 76,250 76,250 - - - 152,500
Visalia Navigation Center Operational (18%) 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 380,000 Eden House Operational (18%) 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 380,000 Total PLHA Expenditures $ 580,800 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,240,800 Expenditures:

Table 2: FY 25/26 - FY 29/30 Proposed PLHA Activities
Expenditures:

Expenditures:

FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 Proposed CDBG, HOME, and PLHA Activities Table 3: FY 25/26 - FY 29/30 Proposed CDBG Activities
Table 2: FY 25/26 - FY 29/30 Proposed HOME Activities
81 1
FY 2024/25 PLHA
Amendment
+
FY 2025/26 – FY 2029/30

PLHA, CDBG, & HOME
5-Year Plans
December 3, 2024 - Work Session
82 2
PLHA (Permanent Local Housing Allocation)
• Aimed at addressing the state’s housing shortage through homeownership, affordable rental housing, & homeless activities. • Revenue is dependent on local real estate transactions with fluctuating activity. Thus, funding varies each year.
• PLHA Household Income Limit – Family of Four
• Homeownership: 120% AMI or lower $105,500
• Rental Housing: 60% AMI or lower $52,740
• Homeless Activity: 30% AMI or lower $26,350
PLHA Estimated FY 2025/26 - 2029/30 Funding
Funding FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total HOME $415,000 $415,000 $415,000 $415,000 $415,000 $2,075,00083 3 Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing
(AOWH)
• Effective FY 24/25 HCD is requiring all jurisdictions to allocate a minimum of 40% of PLHA funds to AOWH activities each year. • Eligible Activities:
• Homeownership activities for working households.
• Predevelopment, development, acquisition, or preservation of affordable ownership housing and down payment assistance.
• Household Income Limit
• 120% AMI or lower
• Family of Four $105,500
84 4
PLHA Citizen Participation
• 91 Surveys Completed - Eng & Spanish: October 17 – November 4, 2024 • Survey Results – Top 5 Housing Needs
1) Affordable Rental Housing
2) Rental Assistance
3) Emergency Drop-in Shelter
4 Permanent Supportive Housing
5) Transitional Housing 85
Eligible PLHA
Funding Uses
Homeownership (40%) (Homeownership
development/assistance, or owner-occupied rehab)
Affordable Rental Housing Development
Matching Funds for Housing Trust Funds
Capitalized Reserves for PSH units.

Homeless Activities (emergency, transitional,
PSH, rapid rehousing, rental assistance etc.)
Administration (5%)
86 6
Proposed FY 2024/2025 PLHA Amendment
*HCD is requiring all local jurisdictions to include 40% toward a homeownership activity for working households (AOWH) effective this year via an Amendment.

PLHA Activity Current
Budget
Proposed
Amendment
Proposed
Budget
PLHA Administration $ 31,541 $ (19,106) $ 12,435
AOWH Homeownership Activity @ 40% - 165,800 165,800
Navigation Center Operational 410,030 (248,375) 161,654 Warming Center Operational 94,622 (57,317) 37,305
Eden House Operational 94,622 (57,317) 37,305
Total FY 2024/2025 PLHA Funds $ 630,815 $ (216,316) $ 414,499 87 7
Proposed Estimated PLHA 5-Year Activities
*Reduced or increased funding will be directed according to the percentages above. **Unspent Warming Center funding will be directed to an Emergency Shelter.

Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual PLHA Allocation $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,075,000 Prior Year Resources 165,800 - - - - 165,800
Total PLHA Resources $ 580,800 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,240,800 Expenditures:

PLHA Administration (5%) $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 103,750 AOWH - Homeownership Activities (40%) 331,800 166,000 166,000 166,000 166,000 995,800 Emergency Shelter (19%) - - 76,250 76,250 76,250 228,750 Warming Center (19%)** 76,250 76,250 - - - 152,500
Visalia Navigation Center Operational (18%) 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 380,000 Eden House Operational (18%) 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 380,000 Total PLHA Expenditures $ 580,800 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,240,800 88 8
What’s Next in the PLHA 5-Year Plan Process?
Citizen Engagement
Analyze Data and Public Input
Identify Projects/Activities & Funding
for the Draft 5 Year Plan
Public Comment Period
Adopt 5-Year Plan
Tonight
Work Session
with Council.
89 9
CDBG & Home
Consolidated Plan (ConPlan)
FY 25/26 – 29/30
90 10
Consolidated Plan (ConPlan)
Outlines goals for housing and community needs for
5-yrs with the use of CDBG and HOME funds.

Includes an analysis of community needs based
on data and public input.

Annual Action Plan details activities to address
identified needs in the ConPlan.

Once adopted the ConPlan can only change by
repeating the Community Needs Assessment
process and submitting an amendment to HUD. 91
11 Citizen Participation
• Organization & Citizen: July 12 - August 2, 2024
• FW Women’s Conference: Fall 2023
Surveys Completed
• Public Hearing & Council Meeting: September 3, 2024
• Citizen Advisory Committee: September 4, 2024
• Virtual Meeting: September 9, 2024
Community Meetings
Organization Focus Groups
• September 25, 2024
• October 2, 2024
92 12
Top 5 Needs in Visalia
(Per Organization Response)
1) Shortage of Affordable Housing
2) Homeless Prevention Programs
3) Mental Health Services
4 Substance Abuse Treatment Programs
5) Job Training Programs
93 13
Top 5 Service Needs Limited to 15% Cap
(Per Citizen Response)
1) Mental Health
2) Homeless/Homeless Prevention
3) Youth
4) Domestic Violence
5) Job Training
94 14
Top 5 Housing Needs (Per Citizen Response)
1) Senior Housing
2) Development of Affordable Rental Housing
3) Emergency Drop-in Shelter
4 Permanent Supportive Housing
5) Home Repair Assistance for
95 15
Top 5 Infrastructure Improvements Needed
(Per Citizen Response)
1) Street/Roads
2) Parks
3) Flood Drainage
4) Street Lighting
5) Sidewalks
96 16
Citizen comments for the use of CDBG & HOME funds
97 17
CDBG (Community Development Block Grant)
• Enhances communities via affordable housing, a suitable living environment, and expansion of economic opportunities for low-to-moderate income persons or areas.
• CDBG Household Income Limits (low-to-moderate)
• 80% Area Median Income (AMI) or lower
• Family of Four $70,300
CDBG Estimated FY 2025/26 - 2029/30 Funding
Funding FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total CDBG $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $6,000,000 98 Eligible CDBG
Funding Uses Public Services (15%)
Acquisition and
Disposition
Public Facilities and
Improvements
Economic Development
Housing
Administration (20%)
99 19
Recommended CDBG Activities
Administration (20%) • Administration and Planning
• Homeless, homeless prevention, domestic violence, mental health, substance abuse, childcare, youth, senior, disabled, legal, and fair housing. Public Services (15%)
Acquisition & Disposition • Code enforcement services
• Emergency shelter, parks, and ADA sidewalk
improvements
Public Facilities &
Improvements
Economic Development • Job training and placement
• Rehabilitation of single-family and mobile homes for Housing seniors/disabled owner occupants. 100 20 Proposed Estimated CDBG 5-Year Activities
*Reduced funding can be directed to code enforcement. Increased funding can be directed to an Emergency Shelter.

Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual CDBG Allocation $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 6,000,000 Program Income 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Prior Year Resources 400,000 - - 400,000
Total CDBG Resources $ 1,700,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 6,900,000 Expenditures:

Administration (20%) $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,200,000 Public Services (15%) 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 900,000 Single-Family Home Repair Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Senior Mobile Home Repair Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Code Enforcement Low-Mod Areas 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 875,000 Emergency Shelter Development 905,000 505,000 - - - 1,410,000 Sidewalk ADA Improvements - - 505,000 355,000 505,000 1,365,000 Park Youth Improvements - - - 150,000 - 150,000
Total CDBG Expenditures $ 1,700,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 6,900,000 101
21 HOME (Home Investment Partnerships Program)
• Creates/retains affordable housing. Affordable housing is lowincome households that pay no more than 30% of their gross income for housing including utilities.
• HOME Household Income Limit – Affordable Rental Housing • 60% AMI or lower
• Family of Four $52,740
HOME Estimated FY 2025/26 - 2029/30 Funding
Funding FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total HOME $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 102
Eligible HOME
Funding Uses
Development of
Housing
Types: Affordable,
Transitional, Permanent
Supportive Housing
May Include: Seniors,
Farmworkers, Homeless
Homebuyer
Assistance
Rehab Single/MultiFamily
Tenant-Based
Rental Assistance
103
23 Recommended HOME Activities
Administration
Senior housing for 62 and older
Affordable rental housing for low-income families
Tenant-based rental assistance for PSH units
104
24 Proposed Estimated HOME 5-Year Activities
*Reduced or increased funding can be directed to Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA).

Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual HOME Allocation $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,500,000 Program Income 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total HOME Resources $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 3,500,000 Expenditures:

HOME Administration (10%) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Rancho Colegio Project 289,000 - - - - 289,000
Senior Housing Project 361,000 550,000 375,000 - - 1,286,000 Affordable Rental Housing Project - - 175,000 550,000 550,000 1,275,000 Tenant-Based Rental Assistance - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Total HOME Expenditures $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 3,500,000 105
25 What’s Next in the CDBG & HOME ConPlan Process?
Citizen Engagement
Analyze Data and Public Input
Formulate Goals, Identify
Projects/Activities & Funding
Draft Con Plan and Annual Action Plan
30-Day Public Comment Period
(estimated: March 21, 2025 – April 21, 2025)
Adopt Plan April 2025
Tonight
106
26 Direction Needed Tonight:
• PLHA
• Approve projects, activities, and proposed funding to be used to draft FY 24/25 PLHA Amendment and the 5-year (FY 25/26 – FY 29/30) PLHA plan. • CDBG and HOME
• Approve projects, program activities and proposed funding to be used to draft the Con Plan for CDBG and HOME funding for the next 5-years which will also be used in the FY 25/26 Action Plan.

Future Council Meetings:
• Review public comments on Draft 5-Year PLHA plan and possibly adopt (Jan 2025)
• Review Draft 5-Year CDBG and HOME ConPlan activities prior to 30-day public comment period. (Spring 2025)
107
27 108
28 Public Services Limited 15% Cap (CDBG)
• Rental/Mortgage Assistance
• Housing Counseling
• Domestic Violence
• Job Training
• Homeless
• Disabled
• Senior
• Youth
• Health/Mental Health
• Substance Abuse
• Crime Awareness
• Fair Housing
• Childcare
• Legal
109
29 Acquisition and Disposition (CDBG)
•Cleanup Vacant Lots
•Rehab Vacant/Foreclosed Properties
•Redevelop Vacant Lots
•Rehab Substandard Properties
•Code Enforcement
110
30 Public Facilities & Improvements (CDBG)
•Homeless Facilities
•Emergency Shelter or Navigation Center
•Parks/Recreational
•ADA Accessibility
•Senior Centers
•Youth Centers
111
31 Economic Development (CDBG)
•Acquisition, Construction, Rehabilitation
•Small Business Assistance
•Technical Assistance
•Job Creation/Retention
•Job Training/Placement *15% cap
112
32 Housing – (CDBG)
• Homebuyer Assistance
• Housing Counseling *15% cap
• Rehab Single/Multi-Family
• Emergency Repairs
• Energy Efficiency
• Code Enforcement
• Lead-Based Paint
• Historic Preservation
113
Visalia City Council
Staff Report
Visalia City Council
707 W. Acequia
Visalia, CA 93291
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.

Agenda Item Wording:

Consolidated Plan Development. Receive an update and provide direction on development of the City’s next 5-year Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) for the use of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), and HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds.

Deadline for Action: 12/3/2024
Submitting Department: Finance and Technology Services
Contact Name and Phone Number: Margie Perez, Housing Specialist, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, (559) 713-4460; Melody Murch, Assistant Finance Director, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, (559) 713-4379; Renee Nagel, Finance Director, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, (559) 713-4375 Department Recommendation:

Staff recommends that Council:

1. Review community outreach results;

2. Provide input on high priority needs; and

3. Provide direction on preparation of the Draft Strategic Plan, Action Plan, projects, and program activities for the use of CDBG and HOME funding for the next 5-years.

Background Discussion:

As required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the City develops a Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) every 5-years to guide the use of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funding. The 5-year ConPlan is the framework for the allocation of resources to support projects and programs benefiting low-and moderate-income people by increasing housing and economic opportunities, strengthening lowincome neighborhoods, addressing public services, and providing for infrastructure needs. As part of the process for the next 5-year term (FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30), staff has been working with a consultant, Baker Tilly, Inc. The process has included preparing and disseminating public notices, information flyers and surveys, collecting and analyzing surveys, conducting community public meetings and stakeholder interviews, and collecting the results to identify high priority needs. Baker Tilly also conducted a Housing Windshield Survey analysis to assess housing conditions, which is a requirement of the Housing Element and provides data that supports affordable housing program needs.

Consolidated Planning Process: The Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) establishes a comprehensive strategy, that identifies community needs, prioritizes those needs, and details how they will be addressed. The ConPlan strategy also incorporates the City’s Citizen Participation Plan (CPP), which governs how the City will conduct outreach to the community and encourage their participation Visalia City Council Page 1 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™114
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.
in the ConPlan, Action Plan, Amendments, and Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) process for this next 5-year term. Also included in the ConPlan is the preparation of an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI), which assists in identifying any barriers to affordable housing, as well as examines policies and fair housing practices surrounding housing choices.

Community Surveys, Public Outreach & Stakeholder Meetings: Through public noticing of community meetings and surveys (see attachment “A-1” survey results), opportunities were provided for the community to give feedback on spending priorities for the next 5-years. This feedback serves as the framework for a community-wide dialogue to identify housing and community development priorities. Staff has engaged citizens and stakeholders to assess community development and housing needs and identify the highest priority needs related to the use of both CDBG and HOME funding over the next 5-years (FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30).

The survey’s links and public notices were posted on the City’s website, and City social media outlets from July 12, 2024, through August 2, 2024. The survey announcements were also posted on the Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance listserv, the Tulare County Homeless Task Force email list, and the Community Care Coalition email list to approximately 1,000 stakeholders. Surveys were also provided during community meetings and community stakeholder meetings held in the months of September and October 2024.

The Community Organization and Resident Surveys were used to gather feedback and information from organizations and residents within the community for the FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 Consolidated Plan. Both surveys were open for responses from July 12 through August 2, 2024. The Community Organization Survey reopened between August 12 through August 16, 2024, and from September 25 through October 4, 2024, to collect additional responses from organizations that attended virtual stakeholders focus groups; the Community Resident Survey reopened between September 6 through September 13, 2024, to collect additional responses from those that attended September community meetings. The Community Organization Survey had 23 respondents, and 122 individuals responded to the Resident Survey. No responses were logged for the Spanish Resident Survey.

Additionally, the City of Visalia Housing Division surveyed individuals during two other events - the 2023 Farmworker Women’s Conference and the Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting on the FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 Consolidated Plan. Please see below for a brief description of the organization and citizen survey results. Please see Attachment “A-1” for full survey results.

Organization Survey Results: Organizations that completed the organizational survey serve the following populations: low-income, homeless, youth, elderly, victims of domestic violence, disabled, protected class members, and individuals with HIV/AIDS. The top 5 gaps (needs) identified by various organizations include:
1) shortage of affordable housing,
2) homelessness prevention programs,
3) mental health services,
4) substance abuse treatment programs, and
5) job training programs.

Visalia City Council Page 2 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™115
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.

Citizen Survey Results: The combined citizen survey results below include results from the online citizen survey, the Farmworker Women Conference survey, and the Citizen Advisory Committee community meeting survey.

The citizen survey top 5 public service needs include:
1) mental health,
2) homeless/homeless prevention,
3) youth,
4) domestic violence, and
5) job training.

The citizen survey top 5 greatest housing needs include:
1) senior housing,
2) development of affordable rental housing,
3) emergency drop-in shelter,
4) permanent supportive housing, and
5) home repair assistance.

The citizen survey top 5 economic development needs include:
1) job training,
2) job creation/retention,
3) workforce development,
4) small business assistance, and
5) business mentoring.

The top 5 citizen survey infrastructure improvements needed include:
1) streets/roads,
2) parks,
3) flood drainage,
4) street lighting, and
5) sidewalks.

Comments Received: In addition to surveys conducted, citizen comments were also received.

Below is a summary of citizens comments received. These comments will be included in the final Consolidated Plan document.

Comments received during the CAC meeting included suggestions to:
· Utilize CDBG funds for housing and services for unaccompanied youth, including aged out foster youth ages 18 to 24 years old as well as youth services for ages 13 to 18 years old.

Comments received during community and stakeholder meetings include the need for:

Visalia City Council Page 3 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™116
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.
· Ongoing supportive services,
· Ongoing operating/sustainable funding of projects serving older adults, homelessness prevention, and intensive case management services,
· Housing for unaccompanied youth, including aged out foster youth ages 18 to 24 years old, · Senior/disabled housing development,
· Senior/disabled housing rehabilitation to remain in their homes, · Affordable rental housing,
· Tenant-based rental subsidies, and
· A low-barrier emergency shelter.

Emailed citizen comments received include suggestions to fund:
· Street asphalt, driveway approach, and sidewalk repairs in low-income residential areas due to damage caused by solid waste trucks.

Funding Sources and Use of Funds
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): The purpose of the CDBG program is to enhance and maintain viable urban communities through the provision of decent affordable housing, a suitable living environment, and the expansion of economic opportunities for low - moderate income persons and households. HUD allows up to 20% of a CDBG award to be used towards general program administration and planning and permits up to 15% to support Public Service activities. The remaining 65% is available for other projects vital to community development such as public facilities and improvements, economic development, and housing.

CDBG National Objectives
To be eligible for CDBG funding, each activity must meet one of HUD’s three National Objectives.

The National objectives are:

1. Benefit low- and moderate-income individuals.

2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of slum and blight.

3. Meeting other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available.

The Benefit to Low and Moderate-Income Individuals (also known as Low/Mod or LMI) is considered the “primary” National Objective of the CDBG program, because federal regulations require that 70% of expended CDBG funds support LMI beneficiaries. The definition of a low or moderate-income person or household is having an income equal to or less than 80% of the area median income (AMI) as established by HUD. The qualifying FY 2024/25 80% annual gross income for a family of four in Visalia is $70,300 or lower.

CDBG eligible activities include but are not limited to:

1. Public services (limited to 15%)
a. Homeless, rental/mortgage assistance, domestic violence, housing counseling, job training, senior disabled, youth, health/mental health, substance abuse, crime Visalia City Council Page 4 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™117
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.
awareness, childcare, legal, and fair housing.

2. Acquisition & Disposition
a. Acquisition & disposition of real property, cleanup of contaminated sites, relocation.

3. Public Facilities & Improvements
a. Homeless facilities (emergency shelter or navigation center), senior centers, youth centers, and infrastructure including water, sewer, street, sidewalk, parks/recreation, and ADA (American with Disabilities Act) accessibility improvements.

4. Economic Development
a. Acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, small business assistance, job creation/retention, technical assistance, and job training*.

5. Housing
a. Homeowner assistance, housing counseling*, rehabilitation of single/multi-family, emergency repairs, energy efficiency improvements, code enforcement, lead-based paint testing/abatement, and historical preservation.
(*indicates activities limited to the 15% public services cap).

Although various types of infrastructure are also eligible for CDBG funding in low- and moderateincome areas, staff has limited the discussion of eligible activities to those lacking significant sources of other funding. A full list of the roughly 100 types of activities eligible for CDBG has been provided as an attachment to this item (Attachment “B-1”). Some items in this listing are noted as “not applicable” to the City of Visalia. This list of eligible activities also notes which have been excluded from this discussion based upon the availability of other funding sources, or the lack of survey responses identifying them as needs within the City of Visalia. Although this has been done to focus the discussion on eligible activities with the most limited funding options, staff welcomes comments and direction on any activities included in the full listing attached.

HUD Encouraged Funding:
· Continuum of Care - HUD strongly encourages local jurisdictions to support the local Continuum of Care (CoC), as they oversee the HUD mandated Point-In-Time (PIT) count, Coordinated Entry Systems (CES), Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS), and Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) rental subsidy vouchers for our region. The local CoC ensures CES and HMIS grant compliance that allows for continued and additional federal and state grant funding opportunities for the City of Visalia. · Fair Housing Services - A mandate in the Fair Housing Act of 1968 requires HUD and its recipients to promote fair housing choice, eliminate disparities, and foster inclusive communities. As a result, HUD strongly encourages local jurisdiction support of fair housing services to affirmatively further the purposes of the Fair Housing Act.

HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME): The purpose of HOME funding is to create and/or retain affordable housing. HUD defines affordable housing as housing where a household pays no more than 30% of their gross income for housing costs, including utilities. Most HOME affordability housing developments are built for households with incomes at 60% or less than the area median income (AMI) level. For example, a qualifying Visalia family of four at 60% AMI in FY 2024/25 has an income of $52,740 or lower and should not be spending more than $15,822 per year on housing. This measure of affordability reveals the housing challenges of low-income households.

Visalia City Council Page 5 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™118
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.

To assist with this need, HOME funding requires that at least 15% of the annual grant be provided to a certified Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) (501C non-profit) for the development of affordable housing (rental and/or ownership). Self Help Enterprises (SHE) is currently the only local organization which meets the HOME CHDO certification requirements, and the City works with them to provide funding for their qualifying housing development projects. However, any organization can apply to administer a Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program.

HOME funds can be used for housing within four basic programs:

1. Development of Housing
a. Types: Affordable rental or owner-occupied housing, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing (PSH).
b. Special populations can include senior and/or homeless.

2. Homebuyer assistance

3. Rehabilitation for owner-occupants

4. Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA)
Below in Tables 2 and 3 are the CDBG and HOME funded activities approved in the current 5-year Consolidated Plan (FY 2020/21 - FY 2024/25). These tables are also included as Attachment “C” to this item.

Visalia City Council Page 6 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™119
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.

Staff Recommended Strategies: As part of the ConPlan analysis, staff reviews current high priority Visalia City Council Page 7 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™120
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.

Staff Recommended Strategies: As part of the ConPlan analysis, staff reviews current high priority needs, required programs, and existing successful activities. Below are staff recommended strategies for the use of CDBG and HOME funds, based upon the data collected.

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG):
· HUD allows up to 20% of CDBG administration. HUD also allows up to 15% of the annual CDBG grant toward public service activities. Requirements for the use of these funds include fair housing and partnering with the Continuum of Care, both of which are funded as part of the 15% public service funding activities. Staff recommend the maximum amounts to be programmed for administration and public services, with additional public service activities to be determined on an annual basis by the Annual Action Plan process, based upon an annual Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).
· Based upon the community needs assessment, staff recommends CDBG funding for a youth improvement project, such as a park or public facility improvement project. Eligible locations are limited to low-to-moderate income areas and not located in a flood plain. If the project is located in a flood plain, it would require ongoing flood insurance. As a result, the eligible areas are limited to Jefferson Park, Woodland Park, and the Anthony Community Center. · In addition, based upon the community needs assessment, staff recommends CDBG funding for the development of a year-round overnight emergency shelter for people experiencing homelessness. A year-round overnight emergency shelter is a vital part of the process to bring individuals out of homelessness, and will support the Police Department in providing immediate shelter for those in need, including those residing in the parks, commercial, and residential areas. However, ongoing sustaining operating for an emergency shelter will need other funding. Staff will continue to research if an extended overnight emergency shelter is financially feasible through leveraging other potential funding including additional federal, state, and local funding sources.
· Staff recommends continued funding for:
o Code Enforcement in low-income areas,
o Senior Mobile Home Repair Program, and
o Public improvements to address the continued need for ADA accessible sidewalks.

Note: Council may choose to fund the current CDBG Code Enforcement position in the General Fund and use the CDBG funding for other CDBG eligible activities. However, CDBG Code Enforcement position allows for consistent monthly CDBG drawdowns that assists in grant compliance.
· Staff also recommends beginning a Senior Single-Family Home Repair Program for senior/disabled low-to-moderate-income owner occupants of single-family homes to assist with essential home repairs such as roof repairs/replacement, plumping repairs, ADA Visalia City Council Page 8 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™121
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.
with essential home repairs such as roof repairs/replacement, plumping repairs, ADA improvements, and efficiency improvements etc. to assist seniors/disabled residents to remain in their homes.

HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME): HOME funding requires that 15% of the annual grant be provided to a certified Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) (501C nonprofit) for the development of affordable housing (both rental and ownership). Self Help Enterprises (SHE) is the only local organization which meets the HOME CHDO certification requirements and continues to be successful with the use of HOME funds. In addition, there is a shortage of rental subsidies in our region to support permanent supportive housing (PSH) units for people experiencing homelessness. HOME Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) can assist in providing much needed rental subsidies for PSH units within the City of Visalia. Any organization regardless of CHDO certification can apply to administer a Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program.

HOME Activities Not Recommended: HOME also allows for homebuyer assistance and owneroccupied rehabilitation. However, in efforts to maximize funding staff does not recommended utilizing HOME funds for these activities since homebuyer assistance will be covered by Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds and owner-occupied rehabilitation will be covered by CDBG funds.

Based on the community needs assessment, staff recommends utilizing HOME funds for:
· Development of a senior affordable housing,
· Affordable housing for low-income families, and
· Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) to support PSH units for people experiencing homelessness.

Proposed CDBG and HOME FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 Activities: Below in Tables 4 and 5 are proposed CDBG and HOME funded activities for the next 5-year Consolidated Plan (FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30). These tables are also included as Attachment “D” to this item. Also, included in Attachment "D” are the proposed next 5-year Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funded activities.

Visalia City Council Page 9 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™122
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.

Council Input and Direction: Staff is presenting the identified needs compiled to date, which have been clearly expressed by Visalia residents and the results of the data analysis (HUD CHAS, Census, etc.), to provide Council with full knowledge of the identified needs. Based upon the information provided, and Council’s knowledge of the needs of their constituents, staff is requesting direction concerning the recommended CDBG and HOME priorities and activities for the next 5- years. This is an opportunity for Council to express their priorities and to suggest activities to be included in the in the DRAFT Consolidated Plan which will be brought back to Council in the Spring of 2025 for review and adoption.

Additional Information on Housing Conditions and Fair Housing Housing Windshield Survey: Included with the consulting services from Baker Tilly was a Housing Windshield Survey which gives insight to real-time existing conditions of single-family and multifamily dwellings within the City. City staff directed and identified areas of Visalia to be included in the windshield survey as part of the ConPlan analysis. Baker Tilly and City staff conducted these surveys on September 18th, 2024. Baker Tilly and City staff drove through the identified neighborhoods and randomly selected homes to profile to ensure impartiality and provide a better reflection of the neighborhood being surveyed. These homes were considered a representative sample of conditions within the neighborhood. Using the rubric created jointly by Baker Tilly and City staff, the following variables were identified:

1. Type of building (single family/multifamily/mixed use)

2. Overall neighborhood condition

3. Roof Condition

4. Siding Condition

5. Landscaping Condition

6. Fence Condition

7. Right of Way Condition

8. Average age of housing stock
Variables 2 through 8 were given ratings of poor, fair, good, or great. The ratings are defined as follows on Table 1 - Definition of Ratings:

Visalia City Council Page 10 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™123
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.

Table 1 - Definitions of Ratings
Poor
Homes constructed prior to 1978
Showing signs of deferred maintenance
Unkempt yard, siding falling off, roof needs replacement Fair
Home greater than 30 years old
Showing signs of needing renovation
Home may need rehabilitation soon
Good
Home between 15-30 years old
Home may be becoming slightly outdated
Will need slight renovations in the near future
Well-Kept
New home
Well maintained yard with new roof and siding
Five neighborhoods were analyzed within the City of Visalia, as well as twenty-one total subsections of these neighborhoods. For a detailed description of the neighborhoods surveyed, please see Attachment F, DRAFT Windshield Survey.

Of the twenty-one areas analyzed on these variables, a vast majority were in good condition (73.3%) with the remainder split between poor (12.4%) and fair (14.3%). No area analyzed was considered to be in 100% well-kept condition, meaning all areas have an opportunity for some improvement. Of the thirteen poor rate variables, twelve were within the Oval Park neighborhood, making the Oval Park area the neighborhood which could benefit from the most improvements. This survey yielded insight into areas of the City that have a high possibility of homes with lead-based paint issues, and neighborhoods that have sidewalks that need improvements to meet ADA standards. Several sidewalks require ADA improvements as they are cracked, uneven, and need ADA curb cut improvements or installation to accommodate those with physical disabilities.

The information provided in the Housing Windshield Survey furnishes the City with data that could be used for future funding sources to help in rehabilitation efforts and public improvements. A copy of the Housing Windshield Survey is included as Attachment “D” to this report.

Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI): As noted above, the ConPlan includes the AI, which assesses the extent of housing needs among specific income groups, evaluates housing choices, and analyzes conditions in the private and public sector that could impede a person’s access to such housing. AI information reflects barriers (see attachment “G” for draft identified potential impediments) related to:

Visalia City Council Page 11 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™124
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.
· Lending practices
· Land Use Policies & Practices
· Regional Collaboration related to services
· Opportunity Indicators
· Housing Discrimination
As a result of the analysis to date, the City will continue to work with its partners and consultants to provide fair housing education as well as to monitor discrimination. The City recently updated its Housing Element that also includes Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. The City shall continue to work with surrounding cities and non-profit providers, as well as the Continuum of Care to share new programs and funding opportunities to address homelessness. The City recommends continued efforts in making programs, such as affordable housing development, available citywide to address segregation and concentration barriers. Baker Tilly staff will also be conducting an analysis of Visalia’s market conditions, and a homeless needs assessment, as well as preparing the Strategic Plan and the first year (2025) Action Plan, based on high priority needs identified through community outreach and City and Council input.

Next Steps
Staff will release a NOFA during winter 2024/2025 to seek applications from organizations prepared to administer public services, and the various proposed ConPlan programs for the 2025/2026 program year. The NOFA is a competitive process, and the resulting staff recommendations for public service and program funding will be brought to Council as part of the proposed Annual Action Plan for 2025/2026.

Staff will use the priorities and direction provided by Council tonight, along with the results of the NOFA process, the data collected, and analysis performed, to draft the proposed Consolidated Plan, and proposed 2025/2026 Annual Action Plan which will be brought to Council in the Spring of 2025 for review, public comment, and adoption.

Fiscal Impact:

None at this time. Staff will return in the Spring 2025 to appropriate CDBG and HOME funds for FY 2025/2026 as part of the ConPlan and Annual Action Plan process.

Prior Council Action:
● April 20, 2020 - Adoption of current Consolidated Plan. ● Annual Action Plans adopted - April of 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. ● Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) approved and submitted to HUD September 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024.
● September 3, 2024 - Public hearing to receive public comment as part of the Public Participation process for development of the FY 2020/26 - FY 2029/30 Consolidated Plan for the use of CDBG and HOME funds.

Other: None
Visalia City Council Page 12 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™125
File #: 24-0454 Agenda Date: 12/3/2024 Agenda #: 3.

Alternatives: None recommended.

Recommended Motion (and Alternative Motions if expected):

I move to direct staff to prepare the draft Con Plan, projects and program activities for the use of CDBG and HOME funding for the next 5-years and FY 25/26 Action Plan to include Council’s approved recommendations.

Environmental Assessment Status: N/A
CEQA Review: N/A
Attachments:
● Attachment A-1: Survey Results
● Attachment A-2: Citizen ConPlan project requests
● Attachment B-1: CDBG Eligible Activity Descriptions
● Attachment B-2: CDBG Eligible Activities Full List
● Attachment C: FY 2020/21 - FY 2024/25 ConPlan CDBG & HOME Activities ● Attachment D: Proposed FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 CDBG, HOME & PLHA Activities ● Attachment E: Low-and-Moderate Income Areas
● Attachment F: Draft Windshield Survey Report
● Attachment G: Draft Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) ● Attachment H: FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 ConPlan PowerPoint Visalia City Council Page 13 of 13 Printed on 11/27/2024 powered by Legistar™126
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

City of Visalia, CA
Consolidated Plan:

Community Engagement Survey Results
2025/26 – 2029/30
127
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Contents
Overview .......................................................................................................................................................3 Community Organization Survey Results .....................................................................................................3 Gaps ..........................................................................................................................................................5 Housing......................................................................................................................................................8 Economic Development.............................................................................................................................9 Community Services................................................................................................................................10 Organizational Collaboration and Partnerships.......................................................................................11 Funding and Resource Allocation ...........................................................................................................11 Community Residents Survey Results........................................................................................................11 Demographics .........................................................................................................................................12 Housing....................................................................................................................................................13 Community Services................................................................................................................................16 Economic and Community Development ................................................................................................16 Social and Recreational Services............................................................................................................18 Farmworker Women’s Conference Survey Results ....................................................................................18 Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting Survey Results...............................................................................22 128
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Overview
The Community Organization and Resident Surveys were used to gather feedback and information from organizations and residents within the community for the 2025/26-2029/30 Consolidated Plan. Both surveys were open for responses from July 12-August 2, 2024 (the Community Organization Survey reopened between August 12-16, 2024, and from September 25-October 4, 2024, to collect additional responses from selected organizations and solicit feedback from organizations that attended virtual focus groups; the Community Resident Survey reopened between September 6-13, 2024 in anticipation of a virtual community meeting). The Community Organization Survey had 23 respondents, and 122 individuals responded to the Resident Survey. No responses were logged for the Spanish Resident Survey.

Additionally, the City of Visalia Housing Division surveyed individuals during two other events – the 2023 Farmworker Women’s Conference on housing and community development needs and the Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting on the FY 2025/26 – FY 2029/30 Consolidated Plan. Details and results from both of these surveys are also presented.

Community Organization Survey Results
A variety of organizations responded to the Community Organization Survey, as shown in Table 1. The largest number of responses came from social service organizations (6) and community development corporations (3). The survey asked about several topics, including gaps in programs and services, housing, economic development, community services, organizational collaboration and partnerships, and funding and resource allocation.

A thorough analysis of survey responses showed that respondents repeatedly emphasized the need for more affordable housing, homeless, mental health, and job training services in the City. Affordable housing and specific housing types to support populations identified as underserved, i.e., individuals with disabilities and the elderly, were called out. Comprehensive homeless support services were cited as another major need. Public infrastructure and community services were generally found to be acceptable, except for public transportation, which was cited as a need related to accessing jobs and employment opportunities.

Organizations emphasized the importance of partnerships for furthering their missions and addressing the identified needs.

Table 1: Community Organization Survey Respondents
No. Organization Name Respondent’s Role Type
1 Self-Help Enterprises Vice President
Community
development
corporation
2 Lindsay Healthy Start Family
Resource Center Director Social service organization
3 Proteus, Inc. Planner Associate
Community
development
corporation
4 RH Community Builders LP Affordable Housing
Development Director
Social service
organization
5 Visalia Rescue Mission Director of Development Social service organization
6 Central CA Legal Services Chief Program Officer Legal aid services 7 Tulare County Library-Visalia
Branch County Librarian Other public entity
8 Kaweah Health Foundation Director Health agency
129
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

9 Tulare County HHSA Deputy Director – Integrated
Services
Regional government
unit
10 Kingsview Case Manager/Housing
Navigator
Housing counseling
agency
11 Tulare County Office of Education
Foster and Homeless Youth
Services
Foster and Homeless Youth
Services Coordinator Other public entity
12 Tulare County Health & Human
Services Agency
Homeless Initiatives Program
Coordinator
Social service
organization
13 The Source LGBT+ Center Executive Director Civil rights organization
14 Visalia Senior Housing CEO
Community
development
corporation
15-16 Kings Tulare Homeless Alliance (2) Executive Directors (2) of Programs and Operations Continuum of Care
17 Community Services Employment
Training Executive Director Social service organization 18 Housing Authority of the County of
Tulare
Deputy Executive Director –
Housing Management Public housing agency
19 Champions Recovery Alternative
Programs, Inc. Executive Director Social service organization 20 TC Hope Board Member Other public entity
21-23 Anonymous (3)* --- ---
Total 23
*Three respondents did not include any identifying information.

Of the three, only two provided responses to the questions within the Organization Survey. 130
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What is the primary population your organization serves? Figure 1 - The organizations primarily serve homeless and low-income populations, followed by the youth and elderly.

Gaps
When asked to choose the most effective existing programs and services in Visalia, respondents overwhelmingly selected affordable housing services (15) and mental health services (12), followed by job training/education/job search services (8) and substance abuse/recovery services (7). The respondents were also able to make suggestions on how existing programs and services can be improved, as shown in Table 2 below.

Table 2: Organization Comments on Improving Existing Programs/Services Organization Name How can existing programs and services be improved to better serve the City of Visalia?
Self-Help Enterprises
Enhance case management and supportive services programs; recruit new providers to the area; invest a higher ratio of CDBG in housing supports.

Lindsay Healthy Start Family
Resource Center
Create more affordable housing, along with addressing
homelessness that doesn’t split up families or require 12-year-old boys not to be with their parents. Re-evaluate rules… and are they poverty-informed?
Proteus, Inc. Creating, initiating, and facilitating affordable housing for community members who are single parents with only one income.

RH Community Builders LP
The City of Visalia has been extremely supportive of supportive housing and affordable housing development. Additional funding for rental subsidies is necessary to support the continued development of these projects.

Visalia Rescue Mission There is a need to expand existing services, and to mobilize services into underserved areas.

Central CA Legal Services Increased funding to support legal aid services.

Kaweah Health Designated low barrier areas for homeless to congregate and get services.

Kingsview More funding.
131
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Tulare County Office of
Education Foster and
Homeless Youth Services
We need a housing navigator that walks someone experiencing homelessness through the steps of accessing the available resources. The young adults I see experiencing homelessness need to be helped at every step of the way, from applying for programs to finding housing options.

Tulare County Health & Human
Services Agency
Visalia is a beautiful city with challenges faced by communities all across the state. We want to see economic growth and vitality but are constrained by resources. Developing a plethora of housing options (low/mid/high), educational pathways, and job training are all essential but hollow without economic development to help create the jobs these individuals will need to sustain themselves. Offering mental health, substance abuse recovery, and other social support programs helps people who have stumbled or fallen get back up and on a path to stability.

The Source LGBT+ Center General lack of awareness of what exists. Better marketing and outreach. Also how to access, not just what is available.

Visalia Senior Housing
Improved communications between support services, agencies caring for seniors. When reaching out to provide help for residents, they often go unanswered.

Kings Tulare Homeless Alliance
I think the city needs more affordable housing and more housing choice vouchers. There also needs to be a rent cap. Currently, many renters pay more than 30% of their income toward rent.

Community Services
Employment Training
Continue to work and partner with non-profits to seek solutions that address the safety net needs of marginalized members of our community. Also, support for case management services is important.

Housing Authority of the County
of Tulare Continued collaboration with community partners to work together.

Champions Recovery
Alternative Programs, Inc.

Youth need gang intervention programs. None exist in the city.

Transitional housing options are lacking, making it difficult for people transitioning out of drug treatment, hospital, and institutions to avoid homelessness.

TC Hope
We need a "drop-in" center for those experiencing homelessness.

More than a warming center, and more than a cooling center. A place police (the Hope Team) can bring those on the street for shelter.

Perhaps reflecting the nature of the populations served by the responding organizations, most organizations noted a shortage of affordable housing options (20) and insufficient homeless prevention programs (17) as the largest gaps in programs and services, but respondents also called out the limited availability of mental health services (15) as a major gap.
132
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What gaps do you see in the current programs and services in the City? Figure 2
A similar question regarding missing programs and services in the City additionally indicates a moderate need for mental health, economic development, senior and youth services, and job training/education/job search services.
133
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What types of services or programs are missing in the City that should be developed? Figure 3
Underserved populations in the City were identified via a ranking scale by organization respondents.

Populations identified by respondents as having above average or very high degrees of underservice include socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals/families, the elderly, individuals with disabilities and others with access and functional needs, and people with limited English proficiency.

Housing
Several questions dug deeper into the nature of the housing gap in the City. Similar to responses in the previous section, roughly 80% of respondents rated the availability of affordable housing as below average or low. Specific housing types needed in the community were identified as affordable housing, permanent supportive housing, transitional housing, and shelters, evidencing a need to support the underserved populations identified in the previous section via housing services. 134
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What do you believe are the top three housing needs in our community? Figure 4
On the topic of affordable housing, the biggest barriers to access were largely a limited availability, high rental costs, and homelessness and housing instability, underscoring the affordability and homelessness issues in the community. To address these issues, respondents recommended the strategies of affordable housing development, preservation, and comprehensive homeless prevention and support services.

Economic Development
Respondents were also asked about economic development needs in the City. Specific questions about the quality of public infrastructure (e.g. roads, parks, utilities) and the availability of jobs and employment opportunities showed that respondents generally found these to be at an average level of acceptability, with slightly more respondents finding access to public transportation, health and social services, and jobs and employment opportunities to be poor versus good. Respondents found the quality of public infrastructure like roads, parks, and utilities to be acceptable or good overall.

However, several economic development issues were identified as pressing, including affordable housing development and workforce development. These results track the gaps previously identified in affordable housing and job training/education/job search services. 135
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Rank the degree to which the economic development issues listed below are pressing needs in the City.

Figure 5
Community Services
Access to health and social services for low-income residents was generally found to be moderate.

However, when asked to select the primary barriers to accessing services like education and childcare, respondents noted issues with cost, transportation, limited availability of services, and a lack of flexible hours. A public transportation-specific question underscored a perceived issue with public transportation access, with the majority of respondents identifying access as very poor to acceptable. 136
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What are the primary barriers to accessing education and childcare services? Figure 6
Organizational Collaboration and Partnerships
Collaboration among community organizations was generally identified as good, with the primary barriers to effective collaboration being competition for funding, resource constraints, organizational silos, and communication. Respondents felt that regular communications and meetings, as well as resource sharing, would enhance organizational partnerships.

In free-text responses, organizations further highlighted the need for partnerships, including the City working with schools, organizations, churches, and organizations partnering to address homelessness and other issues. One respondent noted they are unaware of planning sessions involving developers, builders, and city planners, and another said they would like to see new participants at the table.

Funding and Resource Allocation
Organizations identified unpredictable grant funding cycles and insufficient funding allocations as their most significant funding challenges, followed by matching fund requirements and complex grant requirements.

The types of funding needed were operating grants and program/project-specific grants; organizations generally prioritized partnerships and collaboration as a way to improve the allocation of resources.

Community Residents Survey Results
The Community Residents Survey gathered feedback from residents across the City to support efforts in understanding residents’ funding priorities. The survey collected information on topics including demographics, housing, supportive services, economic and community development, and social and recreational services.

This survey generally demonstrated less consensus on priorities and needs in the City when compared to the Organization Survey. Respondents were fairly well distributed in age and by area of residence and tended to have relatively high income and education levels. Over 80% of respondents were homeowners.

Roughly three-quarters of respondents were employed, and the average household size is 3.23, with most respondents living in two-parent households with children or couples with no children households. About 60% of respondents identified as White, and roughly a third of respondents identified as Hispanic.

Residents were not in agreement as to whether there are areas in the City where housing is affordable.

There appeared to be a slight preference for focusing on affordable rental housing, particularly for seniors, 137
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

as a housing solution, however residents generally favored multiple housing and homeless solutions with few clear priority stand-outs. Respondents identified a need for job creation/retention and job training programs, similar to the Organization Survey results.

For the needs identified in this survey, respondents overwhelmingly called out Oval (95) and North Visalia (65) as the geographic areas with greatest need.

Demographics
Almost 95% of respondents lived in the City limits, with the vast majority of respondents (85%) residing in Northwest Visalia (33), Southeast Visalia (27), Southwest Visalia (23), and Northeast Visalia (12). About 70% of respondents worked in Visalia. Respondents were generally equally distributed across council districts, with slightly more respondents residing in Districts 1 and 2.

What is your age?
Figure 7
Most respondents were between the ages of 35-54 and can generally be described as higher income earners. About two-thirds of respondents lived in a dual income household. About 65% of respondents have a Bachelor’s degree or higher; the remainder of respondents have between a high school diploma and Associate’s degree, with only one respondent having no high school diploma. Most respondents (about 75%) were currently employed; about 65% of employed respondents work full-time for an employer, while about 10% were self-employed, and the remainder worked part-time for an employer or are retired.

The average household size is 3.23; about 45% of respondents lived in a two-parent household with minor children, while 23% lived as a couple without children, 13% were single-person households, and the remainder were senior households, related adults living together, single-parent households, unrelated adults living together, or homeless. The racial makeup of respondents was 60% White, 7% Multiracial, 4% Asian-American, 3% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2% Black/African-American, and 1% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, with the remainder choosing not to respond or selecting “Other.” About 32% of respondents identified as Hispanic.
138
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What is your total household income?
Figure 8
Homeowners made up 80% of respondents, with an additional 15% being renters. Four respondents lived with someone else, and one respondent lived on the street, in a car, or in a homeless encampment.

Housing
Several questions asked respondents about housing needs in the City. Residents were roughly split on the question of whether there are areas of the City where low- to moderate-income households can afford rent, demonstrating a lack of consensus among residents on the topic of housing affordability in the City. If residents felt there were areas of the City where housing is affordable, about 63% of respondents said they would fear for their safety in those areas.

As evidenced below, there was no clear consensus on priority housing needs among residents, with several needs receiving high priority. The highest priority need appeared to be affordable rental housing for older adults. Similarly, there was a slight preference shown for affordable rental housing and permanent supportive housing for unhoused individuals with behavioral/mental health needs. 139
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What are the greatest housing needs in the City of Visalia? Figure 9
140
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What priority level should be given to the following types of affordable housing development solutions if implemented during the next 5 years?
Figure 10
Residents appeared to favor down payment assistance, home repair assistance for owners, rental assistance, mortgage assistance, and energy efficiency improvements. However, residents indicated no clear preference for specific homeless solutions, with multiple types of solutions receiving roughly equal preference; generally, all homeless solutions included in the survey received a moderate to high need ranking.

What priority level should be given to the following types of affordable housing programs if implemented during the next 5 years?
Figure 11
141
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Community Services
Resident respondents also demonstrated a lack of consensus on priority support service needs, with potential standouts being mental health services and domestic violence services.

What priority level should be given to the following types of support services if implemented during the next 5 years?
Figure 12
Residents generally felt neutral about the availability of public transportation routes connecting all areas of the City.

Economic and Community Development
Respondents were asked about priority economic development initiatives and demonstrated a preference for job creation/retention and job training programs.
142
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What priority level should be given to the following types of economic development initiatives or projects if implemented during the next 5 years?
Figure 13
On the topic of challenges preventing individuals from getting jobs, residents selected lack of childcare, skills gap, educational barriers, lack of stable housing, and criminal background as top barriers.

What priority level should be given to the following types of community development/revitalization initiatives or projects if implemented during the next 5 years? Figure 14
When asked about infrastructure improvements, resident respondents appeared to favor street/road improvements most strongly, followed by parks.
143
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

What priority level should be given to the following types of public infrastructure improvement initiatives or projects if implemented during the next 5 years? Figure 15
Social and Recreational Services
There was a wide range of responses on questions regarding the availability of programs like sports leagues and summer camps, and organized group activities and enrichment programs for youth in low- to moderateincome households, as well as the availability of recreational facilities in low- to moderate-income neighborhoods, with respondents skewing toward agreement that these opportunities and amenities are available.

There was generally equal priority given to programs that respondents felt were lacking for low- to moderate-income persons, but the top answers were:
• Childcare assistance (69)
• Workforce development/job training (56)
• Home repair and improvement grants/low interest loans (47) • Down payment assistance (43)
• Health and wellness (e.g. affordable healthcare, mental and behavioral health) (43) Farmworker Women’s Conference Survey Results
On November 16, 2023, the City of Visalia Housing Division surveyed 107 individuals attending the 2023 Farmworker Women’s Conference held at the Visalia Convention Center on housing and community development needs in the City. Nearly 65% of respondents were residents of Visalia, and an additional 28% worked or owned a business in the City. 93% of respondents were low-income households and eligible populations for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and/or HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds. Just over 30% of respondents completed the Spanish language survey, and nearly 85% were Hispanic or Latino. Respondents were equally split between homeowners and renters, with one respondent being homeless.
144
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Figure 16
On the topic of service needs, respondents prioritized homeless and homeless prevention services as well as youth services over other options. Respondents also indicated a strong preference for homeless housing when asked specifically about types of housing needed in the City but selected affordable rental housing and the most needed housing type.
4 5
8 8
9 12
12 13
13 17
17 18
19 19
29 30
39 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
LEGAL

TRANSPORTATION

TENANT/LANDLORD

CRIME AWARENESS

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

TRANSPORTATION
HEALTH

DISABILITY

SUBSTANCE ABUSE

CHILDCARE

MENTAL HEALTH

JOB TRAINING
SENIOR

FAIR HOUSING
YOUTH

HOMELESS PREVENTION

HOMELESS
What services are most needed in the City of Visalia?
145
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Figure 17
Similar to the Community Organization and Resident surveys, respondents indicated a need for job training/placement as well as job creation.

Figure 18
4 8
9 11
17 21
23 43
54 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

RENTAL REHABILITATION

HOMEOWNER REHABILITATION

HOUSING FOR DISABLED

AGED OUT OF FOSTER YOUTH HOUSING

FARMWORKER HOUSING

FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE

SENIOR HOUSING

HOMELESS HOUSING

AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING
What housing type is most needed
in the City of Visalia?
5 9
11 15
38 52
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

COMMERCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION

SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

JOB CREATION

JOB TRAINING/PLACEMENT
What Economic Development activity is most needed in the City of Visalia?
146
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Figure 19
Street improvements were identified as the most needed infrastructure improvement. When asked about community facility needs, respondents again identified homeless facilities as a high priority, followed by youth centers, which underscores respondents’ desire for homeless and youth services.

Figure 20
Survey results also indicate that senior services and housing are a fairly high need, but respondents appear to view homeless and youth as higher-need populations in the City. 15 15
15 18
25 27
63 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

FLOOD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS

ADA IMPROVEMENTS

CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES

WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS

PARK IMPROVEMENTS

SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
What infrastructure improvements are most needed in the City of Visalia?
12 16
19 20
20 25
35 42
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES

CHILDCARE CENTERS

NEIGHBORHOOD FACILITIES

HEALTH FACILITIES

FACILITIES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

SENIOR CENTERS

YOUTH CENTERS

HOMELESS FACILITIES
What facilities are most needed in the City of Visalia? 147
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting Survey Results
On September 4, 2024, the City of Visalia Housing Division surveyed 21 individuals in attendance during the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) meeting, which included the FY 2025/26 – FY 2029/30 Consolidated Plan in-person community meeting held at the City of Visalia Administration at 220 N. Santa Fe Street, Visalia, CA 93292. The meeting covered housing and community development needs in the City. Nearly 76% of respondents were Visalia residents, and the remaining 24% worked or owned a business in the City.

Only 10% of respondents were low-income, and most were White or Caucasian (62%) while 20% were Hispanic or Latino. About 75% of respondents were homeowners, with the rest being renters.

Figure 21
Housing needs identified in this survey mirror those from the Farmworker Women’s Conference; respondents believe affordable rental housing and homeless housing are top priorities. 1 1
1 1
2 3
5 9
13 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

FARMWORKER HOUSING

HOUSING FOR DISABLED

RENTAL REHABILITATION

FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE

HOMEOWNER REHABILITATION

AGED OUT OF FOSTER YOUTH HOUSING

SENIOR HOUSING

HOMELESS

AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING
What housing type is most needed in the City of Visalia? 148
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Figure 22
The CAC community meeting respondents identified a slightly different mix of service needs than the Farmworker Women’s Conference respondents, identifying mental health services as a top need in addition to homeless services. However, facility needs identified by the CAC meeting were the same (homeless facilities and youth centers).

Figure 23
1 1
1 1
2 3
4 4
5 5
6 8
11 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

CHILDCARE
HEALTH

TRANSPORTATION
LEGAL

DISABILITY

FAIR HOUSING

HOMELESS PREVENTION
SENIOR
YOUTH

JOB TRAINING/PLACEMENT

SUBSTANCE ABUSE

HOMELESS

MENTAL HEALTH
What services are most needed in the City of Visalia
2 2
2 4
4 5
8 9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SENIOR CENTERS

NEIGHBORHOOD FACILITIES

PARKS AND RECREATIONAL

CHILDCARE CENTERS

DISABILITY FACILITIES

HEALTH FACILITIES

YOUTH CENTERS

HOMELESS FACILITIES
What Facilities are most needed in the City of Visalia? 149
Consolidated Plan: Community Engagement Survey Results

Figure 24
Street, sidewalk, ADA, and flood drainage improvements were the most needed infrastructure improvements in the City of Visalia identified for the CAC community meeting respondents.

Figure 25
Job training and placement was identified as the most needed Economic Development activity in the City of Visalia, followed by small business assistance, job creation, commercial rehabilitation, and technical assistance in developing businesses for the CAC community meeting respondents. 2 3
3 5
6 7
9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS

PARK IMPROVEMENTS

CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES

FLOOD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS

AMERICAN DISABILITY ACT (ADA)

SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
What infrastructure improvements are most needed in the City of Visalia?
1 3
4 5
13 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPING

BUSINESSES

COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION

JOB CREATION

SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE

JOB TRAINING/PLACEMENT
What is the most needed Economic Development activity in the City of Visalia?
150
1 Margie Perez
From: B. H. <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 5:06 PM
To: Devon Jones
Cc: Margie Perez; B. “Clean is Less Mean” H.; Liz Wynn; John Lollis Subject: Re: Do you possibly explore citizens request for revitalization? Here's my advocacy.....wanting to improve "run down" ( for our poorest citizens in poorest areas) areas due to 40,000 lbs solid waste trucks destroying private access road usually near alley Apt parking ...this is in no way a slam on Solid Waste or COV or drivers! Should be in all caps! Just... over the years wear and tear issue and unforeseeable development of practices and procedures over time ...of dumping trash bins
Here's the issue ...older and I in no way mean recent projects ...allowed & permitted asphalt type area driveways around the trash's bin / trash enclosure area of an Apt complex Completely unforeseeable was the effect of not ordering, making a requirement that the area near any trash bin be a concrete slab ...similar to what is installed now at every bus stop.....to protect the driving area for the immense weight and dumping rolling motion of the trash bin into the truck ....huge forces at work
Why?
The humongous weight of the truck will eventually over time ....absolutely destroy the asphalt to a pulp...

Got examples
Since this is an overlap of public service, in the right of way into private driveway area exclusively into Apts complexes
Want to look a possible city , private right of way partnership to restore these destroyed access driveways using city resources and uplift the poorest areas of the the city ....the whole point of CDBG monies in laymans opinion
Got three to five major examples
Bill
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 4:37 PM Devon Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

Hey Bill, what did you have in mind?
Devon
Sent from my phone
151
2 From: B. H. <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 3:20:53 PM
To: Devon Jones <[email protected]>; Margie Perez <[email protected]> Subject: Do you possibly explore citizens request for revitalization? I have a request....

Bill
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important 152
Code Eligible Activity
Included in
Discussion
Explanation/Other Funding
01 Acquisition of Property - 570.201(a) Yes For eligible purposes related to survey responses 02 Disposition of Property - 570.201(b) Yes For eligible purposes related to survey responses 03A Senior Centers No COV Existing Senior Center
03B Facility for Persons with Disabilities No Special Health needs; Tulare County HHSA 03C Homeless Facilities (not operating costs) Yes Survey Response; Emergency/Drop In Shelter 03D Youth Centers No No Facility Need Identified; see Youth Services 03E Neighborhood Facilities Yes For eligible purposes related to survey responses 03F Parks, Recreation Facilities No
Survey Response-Other Funding; Measure N; Park Impact
Fees; Measure R Trails
03G Parking Facilities No Private, General Fund, and Parking In-Lieu Funding 03H Solid Waste Disposal Improvements No SWEEP Program; Dump-On-Us 03I Flood Drainage Improvements No
Survey Response-Other Funding; Storm Sewer Deficiency
Fund (222)
03J Water/Sewer Improvements No Water/Sewer Funds Various 03K Street Improvements No
Survey Response-Other Funding; Measure R; Gas Tax; SB1; Transportation Impact Fees; Local Transportation Fund
03L Sidewalks No
Survey Response-Other Funding; Assessments;
Development funded; Safe Routes to Schools Grant
03M Child Care Centers No No facility need Identified; see Youth Services 03N Tree Planting No No Need Identified in Surveys
03O Fire Station/Equipment No
General Fund, Measure T, Measure N; Assistance to
Firefighters Grant
03P Health Facilities No Tulare County Health and Human Services 03Q Abused and Neglected Children Facilities No
Tulare County Health and Human Services
No need identified in surveys
03R Asbestos Removal No No Need Identified in Surveys
03S Facilities for AIDS Patients (no operating costs) No Tulare County Health and Human Services
No need identified in surveys
03T Operating Costs Homeless/AIDS Patients No
Tulare County Health and Human Services
No need identified in surveys
03Z Other Public Improvements Not Listed in 03A-03S No No Need Identified in Surveys 04 Clearance and Demolition No Handled by Code Enforcement 04A Cleanup of Contaminated Sites No No Need Identified in Surveys 05A Senior Services Yes Survey Response-Lower Priority
05B Services for Person with Disabilities Yes Survey Response 05C Legal Services Yes Survey Response
05D Youth Services Yes
Survey Response
Measure N; COV Non-Profit Grants; Public Services
05E Transportation Services No Visalia Transit; Also Under Homeless Services 05F Substance Abuse Services Yes
City would not be Sponsoring Agency; Tulare County
Health and Human Services
05G
Services for Victims of Domestic Violence, dating
Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking
Yes Survey Response
05H Employment Training Yes Survey Response
05I Crime Awareness Yes Survey Response
05J Fair Housing Activities-Under Public Service Cap Yes Survey Response 05K Tenant/Landlord Counseling Yes Survey Response; Include in Fair Housing Activity 05L Child Care Services Yes Survey Response
05M Health Services No Tulare County Health and Human Services 05N Abused and Neglected Children No Tulare County Health and Human Services Attachment B1: CDBG Eligible Activity Discussion Listing with Notes 1 of 3 Attachment B1 153
Code Eligible Activity
Included in
Discussion
Explanation/Other Funding
05O Mental Health Services Yes
Survey Response; City would not be Sponsoring Agency;
Tulare County Health and Human Services
05P Screening for Lead Based Paint/Lead Hazards Yes Survey Response; Include in Housing Programs 05Q Subsistence Payments No No Need Identified
05R
Homebuyer Downpayment Assistance-Excluding
Housing Counseling, under 24 CFR 5.100
Yes Survey Response; Also HOME Eligible
05S Rental Housing Subsidies Yes Survey Response; Also HOME Eligible 05T Security Deposits No
May be included in Homeless Services; Encampment
Resolution Funds; HOMEKey
05U Housing Counseling Only, under 24 CFR 5.100 Yes Survey Response; Include in Homebuyer Programs 05V Neighborhood Cleanup No No Need Identified
05W Food Banks No
Various Food Banks; List available at
www.211tularecounty.org
05X Housing Information and referral services No Include in Fairhousing 05Y
Housing Counseling under 24 CFR 5.1 supporting
homebuyer downpayment assistance (05R)
Yes Survey Response; Include in Homebuyer Programs
05Z Other Public Services Not Listed in 03T and 05A-Y No Not Applicable 06 Interim Assistance No Not Applicable
07 Urban Renewal Completion No Not Applicable
08 Relocation No No Need Identified
09 Rental Income Loss No No Need Identified
11 Privately Owned Utilities No Not Applicable
12 Construction of Housing Yes HOME Grant Funding
13A
Housing Counseling, under 24 CFR 5.100, for
Homeownership Assistance 13B
Yes HOME Grant Funding
13B
Homeownership Assistance-excluding Housing
Counseling under 24 CFR 5.100
Yes Survey Response; Include in Homebuyer Programs
14A Rehab; Single-Unit Residential Yes Survey Response; Also HOME Eligible 14B Rehab; Multi-Unit Residential Yes Survey Response; Also HOME Eligible 14C Public Housing Modernization No No Need Identified
14D Rehab; Other than Public Owned Residential Buildings Yes Survey Response; Also HOME Eligible 14E Rehab. Public/Private Commercial/Industrial No No Need Identified 14F Energy Efficiency Improvements Yes Survey Response
14G Acquisition for Rehabilitation No No Need Identified 14H Rehabilitation Administration No No Need Identified 14I Lead-Based Paint Abatement Yes Survey Response
14J
Housing Services, excluding Housing Counseling under
24 CFR 5.100
No No Need Identified; HOME Program Support
14K
Housing Counseling, under 24 CFR 5.100, Supporting
HOME Program Assistance Housing Activities
No No Need Identified; HOME Program Support
14L
Housing Counseling, under 24 CFR 5.100, in
Conjunction with CDBG Assisted Housing Rehab
No
No Need Identified; HOME Program Typically funds this
type of project
15 Code Enforcement Yes Survey Response
16A Residential Historic Preservation Yes Survey Response 16B Non-Residential Historic Preservation No No Need Identified 17A Economic Development Acquisition by Recipient No No Need Identified 17B Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure Development No No Need Identified 17C
Commercial/Industrial Building Acquisition,
Construction, Rehabilitation
No No Need Identified
17D Other Commercial/Industrial Improvements No No Need Identified 18A Economic Development Assistance to For-Profits Yes Survey Response-See Economic Development 2 of 3 Attachment B1 154
Code Eligible Activity
Included in
Discussion
Explanation/Other Funding
18B Economic Development : Technical Assistance Yes Survey Response-See Economic Development 18C Micro-Enterprise Assistance Yes Survey Response-See Economic Development 19C Nonprofit Capacity Building Yes Survey Response
19E Operation and Repair of Foreclosed Property No No Need Identified in Surveys 19F Planned Repayments of Section 108 Loans No No Need Identified in Surveys 19G Unplanned Repayment of Section 108 Loans No No Need Identified in Surveys 19H State CDBG Technical Assistance to Grantees No Not Applicable 20 Planning No No Need Identified in Surveys
20A State Planning-only 570.483(b)(5) and (c)(3) No Not Applicable 21A General Program Administration Yes Provides City Staffing and Operations 21B Indirect Costs No No Need Identified in Surveys
21C Public Information No Include in individual activities 21D Fair Housing Activity (subject to Admin Cap) No See 05J Fair Housing 21E Submission or Application for Federal Programs No No Need Identified in Surveys 21H CDBG Funding of HOME Admin No No Need Identified in Surveys 21I CDBG Funding of HOME CHDO Operating Costs No No Need Identified in Surveys 21J State Administration Costs No Not Applicable
23 Tornado Shelters-Private Mobile Home Parks No No Need Identified in Surveys 24A Payment of Interest on Section 108 Loans No No Need Identified in Surveys 24B Payment of Costs of Section 108 Financing No No Need Identified in Surveys 24C Debt Service Reserve No No Need Identified in Surveys 3 of 3 Attachment B1 155



 








































!" 
#$%&'()*+,$+-./012%$34&)5+).60.-0
789:;<;=;>?>@ABCDEA>EBA=F=GC=H;DDIBJBKBD>EBJ@>ACE:ID;8E:AE><BLM<B8>JBNO;@ PQRS@:?J<H;DDIB:<BJTUVW@>A=GBC89:;<;=;>?>@EA>EBA=FLXG;<8>JB;<@AB9:B?=DF :<BJ@>A=GBC89:;<;=;>?>@EA>EBA=F>?HG;8GCE:ID;8@C8;D;=FYE:ID;8;ZEA>KBZB?=>A G>:<;?[H;DDIB8>?<=A:8=BJ:<;?[>=GBA@:?J<L

\1]/^
_ `a/b6c26b]//6defg2/h6bid1bh]2fd]h122/a6jgkg]6]/h6lfjkgdm6dgkg]n og]a&pqrmfbihs6hhgcb]a/6ll21l2g6]/+5tu6]2gvd1i/sgbh]/6i1m+-, _ `a/b6c26b]//d1ujgb/h6defghg]g1bog]a2/k1d6]g1b12ighl1hg]g1bgb6 hgbck/6d]gwg]ns]a6]6d]gwg]nd6bj/d1i/i6hxdefghg]g1b+-, _ `a/b6c26b]//6defg2/h6bi2/a6jgkg]6]/ha1fhgbcog]a&pqrmfbihm12 2/hgi/b]g6klf2l1h/hsfh/d1i/-%r,
_ `a/b6c26b]//12hfj2/dglg/b]6defg2/hk6bisdk/62hh]2fd]f2/hs12 l6dy6c/hk6bim12]a/lf2l1h/1md2/6]gbc6bgbifh]2g6kl62y12 /bd1f26cgbcd1uu/2dg6kzgbifh]2g6k2/i/w/k1lu/b]sfh/u6]2gvd1i/-*x, {





!" 
#$%&'()*+,$+-.j012%$34&)5+).60.*0
P><=<ABDC=BJ=>=GB<CDBYDBC<BY>AJ>?C=;>?>@ABCDEA>EBA=FC89:;ABJH;=GPQRS@:?J< >A:?JBA:AIC?AB?BHCDL|D;[;IDB8><=<H>:DJ;?8D:JB=GB8><=<;?8;JB?=CD=>J;<E><;?[>@ =GBEA>EBA=FY<:8GC<EABECAC=;>?>@DB[CDJ>8:ZB?=<Y@BB<EC;J@>A<:AKBF<Y=AC?<@BA =C}B<YC?J>=GBA8><=<;?K>DKBJ;?=GB=AC?<@BA>@>H?BA<G;E>@=GBPQRS~C<<;<=BJ EA>EBA=FLXGB8><=<8C?CD<>;?8D:JB=GB8><=<>@=BZE>ACA;DFZC;?=C;?;?[EA>EBA=F EB?J;?[J;<E><;=;>?Y@>AB}CZEDBYI>CAJ;?[EA>EBA=F:EYZ>H;?[[AC<<Y<B8:A;=FL >HBKBAY=GB=BZE>ACAFZC;?=B?C?8B8><=<CABBD;[;IDB>?DF@>AEA>EBA=;B<;?;=;CDDF C89:;ABJH;=GPQRS@:?J<L
€ 

 


$%&'()*+,$+-.i012%$34&)5+).60.%0
PDBCAC?8B>AJBZ>D;=;>?>@I:;DJ;?[<;ZEA>KBZB?=<Y>A=GBZ>KBZB?=>@I:;DJ;?[<=> >=GBA<;=B<L
€
 










$%&'()*+,$+-.i012$%&'()*+,%‚$.d0.50ƒ„fjkgd

6o-+)†$*‡ˆ
78=;K;=;B<:?JBA=C‰B?EA;ZCA;DF=>8DBC?=>};8B?K;A>?ZB?=CDHC<=B>A8>?=CZ;?C=;>? @A>ZC<;=BL
 !


$%&'()*+,$+-.g012%$34&)5+).60.--0
ŠBD>8C=;>?ECFZB?=<C?J>=GBAC<<;<=C?8B@>AEBAZC?B?=DF>A=BZE>ACA;DFJ;<EDC8BJ ;?J;K;J:CD<Y@CZ;D;B<YI:<;?B<<B<Y?>?~EA>@;=>A[C?;‹C=;>?<YC?J@CAZ<L 
       156











!"#$
%!
"$&%$
%'()*+,$#

,#-.
%/

$
"
"
%
0,-1!
"
0
2 $"$30
"+
$

+"
0,-1!+
!1

$#0
"2$
4

56789
: ;<=>788?@=A6>BAC=D86>8EFGBHIJ=IHBH7AH>=>=I7HDH7AK;<=>788?@F?7?87FE =?8E=<=78=I7HDH7AJ6<8=ICEFGBHIJ=IHBH7AKLC8>7M66<@6<8<8B=78N=I7HDH7H8? =<8JF>N8NMH7COPQ;R7C8S<=>788>88N?76?87FE=?8E=<=78=I7HDH7AJ6<8=IC J=IHBH7A6<H@E<6D8@8>7K
: LC8>=J=IHBH7AH?F?8N6>BAGA=?E8IHJHIIBH8>7S<6FER7C8=I7HDH7A?C6FBNG8 =??HS>8N7C8@=7<HTI6N8?E8IHJHI767C=7S<6FER>677C87AE86JJ=IHBH7AKU6< H>?7=>I8R=??HS>VWX76=C8=B7CJ=IHBH7AJ6<=GF?8N=>N>8SB8I78NICHBN<8>R>67 VWYK
: ZJOPQ;JF>N?=<86>BAF?8N76=I[FH<8E<6E8<7AJ6<=EFGBHIJ=IHBH7ARF?8@=7<HT I6N8V\KZJ7C8S<=>788F?8?OPQ;JF>N?76E=AJ6<7C8=I[FH?H7H6>=>N I6>?7<FI7H6>R6<<8C=GHBH7=7H6>6J=EFGBHIJ=IHBH7A6<H@E<6D8@8>7RF?87C8 =EE<6E<H=78VW]@=7<HTI6N8K
: U6<I6@@8<IH=B=>NH>NF?7<H=BH@E<6D8@8>7?F>N8<7=^8>GA=S<=>7886<= ?FG<8IHE8>7J6<8I6>6@HIN8D8B6E@8>7EF<E6?8?RF?8@=7<HTI6N8\_`R\_QR \_OR6<\_PK

abc d e
fgOUhi_VKfV\jIk6<gflmOiWVij=kjfk
n!o,
"$p!"$

,!
"$p"

%
-1

"$"++
!1
q !0
0

$$
%",$/r+"

$"
4
stn
.-,#+"

+
!1
.
2$/-"
%
%1#

1.
$#0
"$&
%#
-1
p
0 "2##
$"
$
$##0


1.
"
20
"$&
%#
-1
4u+
p,st)
$

#4

56789U6<7C8I6>?7<FI7H6>6JE8<@=>8>7C6F?H>SJ6<7C88BN8<BARF?8I6N8\fvJ6<7C8 <8C=GHBH7=7H6>6J?FICC6F?H>SRF?87C8=EE<6E<H=78\g]I6N8K abw


xy
z{ 
 
fgOUhi_VKfV\jIk6<gflmOiWVij=kjfk
n!o,
"$p!"$

,!
"$p"

%
-1

"$"+!$

p/
",0%"p
$#"
%
+
!1

q !0
0

$$
%",$/r+"
0
"$&
%#
-1
4
st)
.-,#+"

+
!1
.
2$/-"
%0
"$&
%#
-1

$#
%1#

1.p
0 "2##
$"
$
$##0


1.
"
2
%1#

1.4u+
p,stn$

#4

56789U6<7C8I6>?7<FI7H6>6JE8<@=>8>7C6F?H>SJ6<7C8E8<?6>?MH7CNH?=GHBH7H8?RF?8 I6N8\fvJ6<7C8<8C=GHBH7=7H6>6J?FICC6F?H>SRF?87C8=EE<6E<H=78\g]I6N8K abe |


}


~

fgOUhi_VKfV\jIk6<gflmO
iWVij=kjfk
n!o,
"$p!"$

,!
"$p!"$2
"$"+-,1#$/p"

%
-1

"$"+
0"

.
%1


$#

$
"$
1%",$/+"

%%"1p$!1,#$/2!
"+#"
!
2"1$!p#

$/2"1$!p ,
1

,1
"


1€$/p#


2!
p
,$
&
.!%1#
$p
#
,/"++$#
p
$#0

"14

56789U6<7C8I6>?7<FI7H6>6JE8<@=>8>7C6F?H>SJ6<7C8C6@8B8??RF?8I6N8\fvJ6< 7C8<8C=GHBH7=7H6>6J?FICC6F?H>SRF?87C8=EE<6E<H=78\g]I6N8vJ6<J=IHBH7H8?J6< =GF?8N=>N>8SB8I78NICHBN<8>RF?8VWXK
157


 





 !"#
$



%&'()*)+),-.&,-*+/(&+),-.,//0123)4)+2+),-,552&)4)+)0*)-+0-6067/)82/)495,/9,(-: 70,7402:0;<+,;=>?10*0)-&4(607429:/,(-62-6/0&/02+),-2452&)4)+)0*+12+2/072/+ ,529,(+1&0-+0/>
@,/+102&'()*)+),-.&,-*+/(&+),-,//0123)4)+2+),-,552&)4)+)0*)-+0-6067/)82/)495,/ &1)46/0-2:0;A2-6(-60/.(*0B<CD5,/52&)4)+)0*5,/23(*062-6-0:40&+06&1)46/0-. (*0B<E>
F GHI
J 
KLMNHOH
H

 !"#
$



%&'()*)+),-.&,-*+/(&+),-.,//0123)4)+2+),-,552&)4)+)0*+12+2/07/)-&)7244960*):-06+, *0/P02-0):13,/1,,62-6+12+Q)4430(*065,/*,&)24*0/P)&0*,/5,/8(4+)7407(/7,*0* R)-&4(6)-:/0&/02+),-S>T(&152&)4)+)0*829)-&4(604)3/2/)0*2-6&,88(-)+9&0-+0/*> L UMVWXNM
H MOLMNHOH
H

 !"#
$



Y0P04,780-+,5,70-*72&02/02*,/52&)4)+)0*)-+0-6067/)82/)495,//0&/02+),-24(*0> Z UMVHILMNHOH
H

 !"#
$



%&'()*)+),-.&,-*+/(&+),-.,//0123)4)+2+),-,572/[)-:4,+*2-672/[)-::2/2:0*>\*0 B<])5/0123)4)+2+),-,527(34)&52&)4)+9,/*+/00+)87/,P080-+)*2*824472/+,52- 2&+)P)+9+,)87/,P0272/[)-:52&)4)+9>^,Q0P0/.)572/[)-:)87/,P080-+*2/0,-492 *824472/+,5242/:0/*+/00+)87/,P080-+2&+)P)+9.(*0B<_> ` a OHKbM
Hc MOdec fe


 !"
$



%&'()*)+),-.&,-*+/(&+),-,//0123)4)+2+),-,5*,4)6Q2*+06)*7,*2452&)4)+)0*>?1004):)340 &,*+*&2-24*,)-&4(600'()780-+.*(&12*3(446,g0/*.(*060h&4(*)P0492++1052&)4)+9> d LO KMHMIdec fe


 !"#
$



%&'()*)+),-.&,-*+/(&+),-.,//0123)4)+2+),-,554,,66/2)-2:052&)4)+)0*.*(&12*/0+0-+),- 7,-6*.&2+&132*)-*.*+/02832-[0/,*),-&,-+/,4*.&12--04)g2+),-,5*+/028306*.,/ 628*>B<ijklkmnopqrnqstouvwuqqlxltuknyurjyruqz{|}uo~q|qlynyo|klkq *+,/8Q2+0/>^,Q0P0/.)5*+,/8Q2+0/82-2:080-+)87/,P080-+*2/0)-+0:/24+,*,80 ,+10/2&+)P)+94)[0272/[,/2*+/00+7/,€0&+.)+*1,(4630)-&4(606)-+12+82+/)h&,60 RB<@5,/72/[*.B<_5,/*+/00+*S/2+10/+12-B<i>

‚ƒ„
†‚‡ˆƒ#‰Š 
†ˆ‚ ‡
‚‹†Œ ƒ$Ž‹‹‚$‚‹†Šˆ‚ ˆƒ‘ƒ ˆ’ˆ‚ ƒƒ‚“ $‹†ˆ’  ˆ‚ “ $‹†ˆ!ˆƒ#”Š ˆ‚ ˆƒ‘ƒ ˆ$†“#•Š ˆ‚ ƒƒ‚$†“ˆ‚ “ $‹†ˆ – bM
—a˜dec fe


 !"#
$



i-*+2442+),-,//0742&080-+,5Q2+0/4)-0*.*2-)+2/9*0Q0/*.*+,/8*0Q0/*.2-65)/0 196/2-+*>™,*+*,5*+/00+/072)/*R(*(2449/072P)-:S8260-0&0**2/939Q2+0/š*0Q0/ )87/,P080-+2&+)P)+)0*2/0)-&4(606(-60/B<›>

@,/Q2+0/š*0Q0/)87/,P080-+*+12+2/072/+,5œ
 C,/00h+0-*)P0*+/00+)87/,P080-+*.(*0B<_>@,/0h28740.2-2&+)P)+9 +12+)-P,4P0*72P)-:*)h34,&[*,5C2)-T+/00+2-6)-*+244)-:;BB500+,5 -0QQ2+0/4)-0*)-,-0,5+1,*034,&[*>
%1,(*)-:/0123)4)+2+),-2&+)P)+9*(&12*Q2+0/š*0Q0/1,,[(7*R4)-0* 5/,821,(*0+,+10*+/00+S.(*0+10277/,7/)2+0;žŸ1,(*)-: /0123)4)+2+),-82+/)h&,60>
158


 






 

 !"#$
%

&'()*++*),-'-../0*,.-1().//)(2().//)3.*,'(2()-.43.*,'(256.7(*'386))/.(2)6''/+(2

7.,38/(2*'3).*11,5+,89)(:(,8'(;<+(-6(/=>?@
AB-.,40.-C/4/')()9*),'5+63/+*'3(5*0,'82().//)+,89),'82*'3:-.().//) DEFGDHIJKKJGLMNOPONNOQRJSDTDRNOORDISUEGFVWX
A&1(,3/Y*+Z,40.-C/4/')([(//5-3/=>\]*./0*.)-14-.//^)/'(,C/ ().//),40.-C/4/')(;
_ `a
bcde

 !"#$
%

&40.-C/4/')()-(,3/Y*+Z(;<+(-6(/=>\1-.(,3/Y*+Z,40.-C/4/')()9*),'5+63/)9/ ,'()*++*),-'-1).*(9./5/0)*5+/(2+,89),'827/'59/(2*'3).//(; f gh`dagc

g




 !"#$
%

<5i6,(,),-'25-'().65),-'2-../9*7,+,)*),-'-11*5,+,),/(,')/'3/30.,4*.,+j1-.59,+3./' *8/kl*'36'3/.;m^*40+/(*./3*j5*./5/')/.(*'3n/*3o)*.)0./(59--+5/')/.(; B-.)9/5-'().65),-'-../9*7,+,)*),-'-11*5,+,),/(1-.*76(/3*'3'/8+/5)/359,+3./'26(/ =>pq1-.)9/5-'().65),-'-../9*7,+,)*),-'-11*5,+,),/(1-.)//'*8/.(26(/=>r s t

udc `v

 !"#$
%

wIRExEREODLEKEROQRJRNOOULSGREGFHDJKOREKODNOPONNOQRJSDTyOSzREPEISREJGVWX B-.().//)(5*0/*5),C,),/()9*),'5+63/).//0+*'),'826(/=>?q1-.(,3/Y*+Z ,40.-C/4/')*5),C,),/()9*),'5+63/).//0+*'),'826(/=>\; { |`

 c `}~€`

 

 !"#$
%

<5i6,(,),-'25-'().65),-'2-../9*7,+,)*),-'-11,./()*),-'(*'3:-.)9/06.59*(/-11,./ ).65Z(*'3/4/.8/'5j./(56//i6,04/');
u 
cd h|c‚`d` `


 !"#$
%

<5i6,(,),-'25-'().65),-'2-../9*7,+,)*),-'-109j(,5*+-.4/')*+9/*+)91*5,+,),/(; m^*40+/(-1(6591*5,+,),/(,'5+63/'/,897-.9--35+,',5(29-(0,)*+(2'6.(,'89-4/(2*'3 5-'C*+/(5/')9-4/(;
n/*+)91*5,+,),/(1-.*(0/5,1,55+,/')8.-60(9-6+36(/)9/4*).,^5-3/1-.)9*)5+,/')

8.-60;B-./^*40+/26(/=>p1-.)9/5-'().65),-'-../9*7,+,)*),-'-19/*+)91*5,+,),/( 1-.*76(/3*'3'/8+/5)/359,+3./';
ƒ |c‚`d` `
„

†€
acas
vd
‚
agh`da



 !"#
$
%

<5i6,(,),-'25-'().65),-'2-../9*7,+,)*),-'-13*j5*./5/')/.(2)./*)4/')1*5,+,),/(2-. )/40-.*.j9-6(,'81-.*76(/3*'3'/8+/5)/359,+3./';
‡
†
 ‡

cd

 !"#$
%

ˆ/9*7,+,)*),-'-1*'j067+,51*5,+,)j6'3/.)*Z/'0.,4*.,+j)-./4-C/*(7/()-(;  |c‚`d` `
„


‰uc `
 Š 

c `v‚ ‹

 !"#
$
%

<5i6,(,),-'25-'().65),-'2-../9*7,+,)*),-'-11*5,+,),/(1-.)9/)./*)4/')-.)/40-.*.j 9-6(,'8-10/-0+/Y9-*./n&Œ0-(,),C/-.Y9-9*C/<&ro; B-.)9/5-'().65),-'-../9*7,+,)*),-'-11*5,+,),/(1-.<&ro/365*),-'*'30./C/'),-'2 6(/=>;
159


 





  



 !"#$%&'( ')*+,-.! /0"
%1'%*2,* ,
3456789:5;<=>?:?@A8<?6789:5;<=>?BCDEFAGH6?9456<=>?I4?F8F8<95J59G>=?6 F=9K8AAHF>?:87=:?6@?<5K5<BCLMBCN789:5;<=>?DO4?<P94?K=AA=I5FQR?K=:?H65FQ 9456789:5;<=>?S
T U:8F9??678G=FAG48J?=F?@HRA5<K8<5A59G5F8F8<95J59GDU:8F9??67H69 6?9H@86?@8:89?8<95J59GK=:?8<4@HRA5<K8<5A59GDV4?F9I==:7=:? :?A89?>K8<5A595?68:?KHF>?>RGOWXUY94?Q:8F9??F??>69=6?9H@8 6?@8:89?8<95J59GK=:?8<4K8<5A59G=:57@:=J?7?F9D
TBCZ<8FR?H6?>K=:6?8I8AA6YRH664?A9?:6Y:?985F5FQI8AA6Y8F>I5F> 9H:R5F?6D
TBCZ<8FR?H6?>K=:8<95J595?69489866569@?:6=F6I594>568R5A595?6RG :?7=J5FQ8:<459?<9H:8AR8::5?:6K:=7=:@:=J5>5FQLWL57@:=J?7?F969= Q=J?:F7?F9RH5A>5FQ6[8<95J595?69489=94?:I56?I=HA>F=9R??A5Q5RA?K=: OWXUKHF>5FQ\D
] 


 ^
 !"#$%&'( ')*_,-.! /0"%1'%*2,*!,
EFAGK=:8<95J595?6HF>?:98P?F?594?:9=S
T `8P?A5759?>57@:=J?7?F96[?DQDY:?@85:=K69:??96Y65>?I8AP6Y=:@HRA5< RH5A>5FQ6\5F9?F>?>6=A?AG9=8::?69KH:94?:>?9?:5=:895=F=K@4G65<8AAG >?9?:5=:89?>8:?86@:5=:9=78P5FQ@?:78F?F957@:=J?7?F96D TLAA?J589??7?:Q?F<G<=F>595=F694:?89?F5FQ@HRA5<4?8A948F>68K?9GY 6H<486:?7=J8A=K9:??A57R6=:=94?:>?R:568K9?:878a=:69=:7D bb

^
cd

e  
 !"#$%&'( ')*f,-.! /0"%1'%*2,*)!,
L<gH56595=FY:?<=F69:H<95=FY:?48R5A59895=FY=:5F698AA895=F=K>569:5RH95=FA5F?68F> K8<5A595?6=K:?QHA89?>Y@:5J89?AG=IF?>H95A595?6D34565F<AH>?6@A8<5FQF?I=:?;5695FQ >569:5RH95=FA5F?6hK8<5A595?6HF>?:Q:=HF>D
b]i 
j


 ^k 




^  !"#$%&'( ' *l,
m?48R5A59895=F=K4569=:5<RH5A>5FQ6K=:F=Fn:?65>?F958AH6?Do;87@A?65F<AH>?94? :?F=J895=F=K8F4569=:5<RH5A>5FQK=:H6?868F?5Q4R=:4==>K8<5A59GY8687H6?H7Y=: RG8F4569=:5<@:?6?:J895=F6=<5?9GD
p 
^
q



q

r

^
s
k

^
t! /0"%1'%*2,* %,
O=F69:H<95=F=:57@:=J?7?F9=K9=:F8>=n68K?64?A9?:6K=::?65>?F96=K78FHK8<9H:?> 4=H65FQ@8:P68F>94?@:=J565=F=K8665698F<?[5F<AH>5FQA=8F68F>Q:8F96\9=F=F@:=K59 8F>K=:n@:=K59?F9595?69=>=6=Y5F8<<=:>8F<?I594N?<95=FuvwNOxCBx[8\[vu\D 160












 !"#$%&''(
)*#

+$
'

$

%&



&,-
'%
+#'(.#&/

$


%&



012/%$

$

+
'
#'
&,

3
042(
) 5
&

&,
'
#
&',
'


$&%#$%&'(
) 6#




,%#-
 !"
$

&,

#



%$&
+-
#$%&'%
+$(
) *

',
&
+$#/$



+$#(.#&/$042

'(
789 :;<

=>?@
AB
CB
;D
A<EFGHIJKLMELNOPQRSFETUGJVLJOWQOXQYEF
GHIJKLMFXEOZQOEQ
-

#

#+


&
2* [#
/
$


/$&/


/

$
(
!$#,

#
+

#+#$%&'$

!"/&& !"#
$
01\'
&$

&$&



]$%&['#(
7^>

C ;




EFGHIJKLMELNOPQRSFETUGJVLJOWQOXQYEFGHIJKLMFXEOZQOEQ ['

&&,(042,%$

',
'%

&&,

#
-
%&#'

#&,'&&,(*


',

#&,'#
-
%&/$04!
(
7^_



`;


;Ca Bb@ A  B
EFGHIJKLMELNOPQRSFETUGJVLJOWQOXQY EFGHIJKLMFXEOZQOEQ ['

#
-
%&/+&
+(
*

',

#&,
&&,#
/$042
(
7^c d
DA



EFGHIJKLMELNOPQRSFETUGJVLJOWQOXQYEFGHIJKLMFXEOZQOEQ ['#'
+&+&&-e
e
fgh*i#
(
*

&+&'
&,#'

&



j&
&#$/$
04k(
7^@ l;Bb



EFGHIJKLMELNOPQRSFETUGJVLJOWQOXQYEFGHIJKLMFXEOZQOEQ ['
,$
+##&+m1mn(.#&/
&'&

+

$
&
+#+(04 
&%$
$
&
+
#+
+
%$
&$$
&
+


&,-&&(
.'

&
+mo
$
/$04gp
'
%$


+&
&
/$04q(
7^r 9
ACs;
BAB ;C



EFGHIJKLMELNOPQRSFETUGJVLJOWQOXQYEFGHI
JKLMFXEOZQOEQ
"
&
#
'(
\
#
'
#
&
+$#
$&$



&
+$#(.#&/$042

#
'

&&,(
161











!"#$%&
'!(!)


(*!!
+,-./01230-,.343256347845940:.01;.,-./01230-,.3843631/<51=3;,20/<51 02/<6</<3.>?@/A3.346<23.0438456<;3;@540.832<@<22B<31/945,8C/A3:0/4<D25;3@54 /A0/2B<31/945,8:07-3,.3;<1./30;>E543D0:8B3C.,-./01230-,.3.346<23./A0/ /0493//3310934.:07-325;3;3</A34FGH54FGE>
I 
JK
L
KJMKL

KNOM

PKNO
Q
N

N
K

NRP




!"#$%&
'!(!)

(*!!
+346<23.@546<2/<:.5@;5:3./<26<5B3123C;0/<196<5B3123C.3D,0B0..0,B/54./0BS<19> E54.346<23.B<:</3;/50-,.3;01;139B32/3;2A<B;431C,.3FGT> U VLWNKXL
Y
P



!"#$%&
'!(!)


(*!!
Z..<./0123/5<12430.3.3B@[.,@@<2<3127C<12B,;<19B</34027C<1;3831;31/B<6<19.S<BB.C \]^_`]a\bcbdefghijhkjlbdefmlhache]ckdno]]pkghiqc\kbdbdefh\c\kbdbd9 ./,;31/.<10804/<2,B04@<3B;51.S<BBrA31/A343<.15/<3/50.832<@<285.</<5154 -,.<13..>
E5402/<6</<3.8456<;<19/40<1<19@54.832<@<2834:0131/s5-.r</A.832<@<2-,.<13..3.C ,.3tuZ>
v wLx


yz
K



!"#$%&
'!(!)


(*!!
{45:5/<515@24<:30r04313..01;843631/<51C<12B,;<1924<:3843631/<513;,20/<51 845940:.C25::,1</7[54<31/3;85B<2<19845940:.0-56301;-3751;154:0B./0@@<19 B363B.C<1./0BB0/<515@.32,4</720:340.C01;807<19@54.32,4</79,04;.> | 
UK
P


}

~

Kz
N

W



!"#
$%&
'!(!)

(*!!
E0<4A5,.<19.346<23.€3>9>25,1.3B<1951A5,.<19;<.24<:<10/<510.8,-B<2.346<23.> ‚A302/<6</7133;./5:33/010/<510B5-s32/<63>
E54@0<4A5,.<19.346<23.02/<6</<3.2044<3;5,/0.804/5@931340B845940: 0;:<1<./40/<51€01;/A,.15/43ƒ,<43;/5:33/010/<510B5-s32/<63C,.3„tH> 
 Y

y†
MNKMwK 
NP



!"#$%&
'!(!)


(*!!
‡5,1.3B<19/5A3B8843631/54.3//B3;<.8,/3.-3/r331/3101/.01;B01;B54;.> † wˆNMw





!"#$%&
'!(!)


(*!!
+346<23./A0/r<BB-313@</2A<B;431€931340BB7,1;34093t‰C<12B,;<1980431/<19.S<BB. 2B0..3.>
E54.346<23.3D2B,.<63B7@540-,.3;01;139B32/3;2A<B;431C,.3FGT> Š U
N
ˆ




!"#$%&
'!(!)

(*!!
+346<23.0;;43..<19/A38A7.<20BA30B/A133;.5@43.<;31/.5@/A325::,1</7> E54:31/0BA30B/A.346<23.C,.3FG‹>
Π
JK

M
MŒPN
MwˆNM



!"#$%
&
'!(!)

(*!!
H07204301;5/A34.346<23.3D2B,.<63B7@540-,.3;01;139B32/3;2A<B;431> 162


 



  


!"#$%&'
 (" )"*


) +" "
,-./01-2344.-2205678-9-573:8-3:785--42;<.-204-572;<78-1;99=507>? @ 

ABCD
E@CC

A


!"#$%&'
 (" )"*


) +" "
F170/070-2=54-.73G-5H.093.0:>7;H.;/04-21.--5056<;.:-34H;02;5056? 
I#J!K
L%M!
NJ#J!MJO!#OP!Q#$O#MMRSP!P!(TO#RMRUV

L%M!WJ#J!MJSXRPTRUVMYO$#O!$JR!MQ#$O$!M!U+!#QP!(T+#UJ(ZRU(JR#U 

[ \]

 @
^_





S" "#$%&'
 (" )"*


) +" "
`5-a709-;.28;.7a7-.9b5;9;.-783578.--9;5782c-9-.6-51>H3>9-572;5d-83:< ;<0540/04=3:2;.<390:0-2e6-5-.3::><;.78-H=.H;2-;<H.-/-570568;9-:-225-22? fg39H:-2051:=4-=70:07>H3>9-5727;H.-/-571=7;<<;<2-./01-e354.-57h9;.7636- H3>9-5727;H.-/-57-/0170;5?
i C_ ]\^ jCk
l
^_

m

 nop
\E
AC\
AqC\


A\
E 
rsqtiuv


!"#$%&'
 (" )"*

) +" "
w;9-d=>-.4;x5H3>9-57322027351-H.;/04-4323yz{|}~,f€}~f?}<8;=2056 1;=52-:056b=54-.‚~ƒ„?
††c02H.;/04-47;051;5‡=5170;5x0784;x5H3>9-57
322027351-e.-H;.78;=20561;=52-:0562-H3.37-:>=54-.937.0g1;4-†„ˆ?}<.-<-..3: 2-./01-2e8;9-;x5-.280H-4=1370;5H.;6.392e;.6-5-.3:d=46-7h<0535103:1;=52-:056

3.-H.;/04-47;8;9-d=>-.2051;5‡=5170;5x0784;x5H3>9-57322027351-32H3.7;<3 H31G36-e78-578-2-./01-23.-1;5204-.-43170/07>4-:0/-.>1;272323H3.7;<35†„ 3170/07>?
L}7022=d‡-177;78-H=d:012-./01-13He=5:-2278-322027351-02H.;/04-4 d>3~{‰`0535Š,F;.d>3
†„b3cb
„c-5707>?
L `5:>.-H;.778-5=9d-.;<8;=2-8;:427837.-1-0/-44;x5H3>9-57 322027351-32311;9H:0289-572<;.†„?
Lƒ;.9;.--g7-520/-7>H-2;<8;9-;x5-.280H322027351-H.;/04-4=54-. 3=78;.07>;<78-Š370;53:F<<;.43d:-w;=2056F17e=2-1;4- ‹{?
 i

C\
A\]E 


#$%&'
 (" )"*


) +" "
Œ-53572=d2040-2-g1:=20/-:><;..-573:H3>9-572<;.9;.-783578.--9;5782? F170/070-2H.;/040567802<;.9;<322027351-9=27d-13..0-4;=7d>~{‰`2;.

†„b3cb
„c-57070-2?
  \
^j lC



!"#$%&'
 (" )"*

) +" "
Œ-53572=d2040-2-g1:=20/-:><;.H3>9-57;<2-1=.07>4-H;2072? 163


 











!"#$
#%&'()*

+,

!-#!&.(&/(0


!"#$
/
&1(&
(
234567893475:;678<47=:>?@ABCDEFGG<H3>>:7I:>5<J3K:3L7:>5<M7=N3>O3I:7I6M; 7:LJ3K:P4Q:>5IJMI65O>3R6=:=M5M767=:O:7=:7IO4P;695:>R69:S6E:E<73IM5OM>I3H M73IJ:>:;686P;:J345678M9I6R6IQTE
U V
WX W Y
Z



!"#$
#%&'()*

+,
!-#!&.(&/(0



!"#$
/
&1(&
(
[7:\I6K:3>5J3>I\I:>K:HH3>I5I3>:K3R:I>M5JM7==:P>65H>3K7:68JP3>J33=5E ]^MKO;:53H;:86I6KMI:45:53HIJ6593=:679;4=:7:68JP3>J33=9;:M74O9MKOM6875M7= 8>MHH6I6>:K3RM;E
_  `Y
a



!"#$
#%&'()*

+,
!-#!&.(&/(0


!"#$
/
&1(&
(
A35I5M55396MI:=L6IJIJ:3O:>MI6373HH33=PM7b5<93KK476IQb6I9J:75<M7=H33= OM7I>6:5<549JM55IMHH935I5<54OO;6:5<4I6;6I6:5<KM67I:7M79:<M7=6754>M79:E c 

d
e fYg

Y
eYhi
j



!"#$
#%&'()*

+,

!-#!&.(&/(0


!"#$
/
&1(&
(
k7M9I6R6IQIJMIO>3R6=:5J34567867H3>KMI637<:=49MI637<M7=>:H:>>M;5:>R69:5<3> 8:7:>M;P4=8:INH67M796M;93475:;678IJMI=3:573IK::IIJ:?@ABCDEFGG=:H676I6373H 2345678A3475:;678E
l 







h
ZZ g

 fX

m n
ZYf
go

gY
jpq


!"#$
#%&'()*

+,
!-#!&.(&/(0



!"#$
/
&1(&
(
2345678A3475:;678<47=:>?@ABCDEFGG<IJMI65O>3R6=:=I367937r479I637L6IJ J3K:P4Q:>=3L7OMQK:7IM5565IM79:SGDCTM5MO4P;695:>R69:E 
s tgWu
X
jhi
j
V gv

g

wxY
oyl


!"#$
#%&'()*


+,
!-#!&.(&/(0


!"#$
/
&1(&
(
zJ65KMI>6^93=:>:O;M9:=KMI>6^93=:GDE[7;Q45:IJ65KMI>6^93=:LJ:7M7M9I6R6IQ =3:573IHM;;47=:>MK3>:5O:96H69GDk\GD{93=:E
k7:^MKO;:3HM;:86I6KMI:45:3HIJ6593=:65LJ:7IJ:A|}~H47=5M>:O>3R6=:=I3M 737\O>3H6I3>8M76MI637IJMIO>3R6=:5K4;I6O;:IQO:53H5396M;5:>R69:5H3>3O:>MI678 935I5E€7M73IJ:>:^MKO;:<LJ:7MO4P;695:>R69:M9I6R6IQIJMI=3:573IJMR:MK3>: 5O:96H69KMI>6^93=:<O>3R6=:55:>R69:5I3K4;I6O;:8>34O53H9;6:7I5549JM55:763>5< ‚ƒ„
†„‡ˆ‰Š‹ˆ„ŒˆŽˆ‰ˆ‚„Œ†‹Š
‚Ž‚„„‚ƒ„
†„‘’
ƒˆ†„‰Œ†“‚”
ƒŒ•‚ŒŽ„
†‡Š‚‚Ž„–
O>38>MKH3>5:763>5M7=O:>5375L6IJ=65MP6;6I6:5<45:GD—E€HIJ65O>38>MKJM=37;Q P::7MRM6;MP;:I35:763>5<IJ:93>>:9IKMI>6^93=:L34;=JMR:P::7GDkE 164










 !




 "#!$%


#!
&''&

!


 (!
#)


!"!

*+,,-./0123456,7.5.08+-3/.930+*:;
 <#!#)""!

'&"!



!=>?@ A
BCC&


!


&
$")

 ?'!%




D"
!!B>E&B>F&B>GH

 

!
I
$"&
I!#

&
I

I"#!&"$&"!& 


"'$
"!






'#J

 K"#!"#&$&') 





!

"")

LM N OPQ
RSTU
VWQXYZ[\]^_`X_abcdefYXghZ]i_]bjdbkd
l)#!
!!##")

!""
)?FEG%'

mn o
RpVR

O

XYZ[\]^_`X_abqdr]^_`X_YefYXghZ]i_]bjdba]d
?!

?FEG!#

s
)?EFt&


=>?@ AuC
=C>DHv
>=wx?
AyCADHDBAHv

"'!
w!#z&>=wx?
l>{

m|} 

o
QT

~
Qpn€oP‚ƒmLL~OpWQ„
Qp

†}
RS
VQ
‡m|ˆ‰
XYZ[\]^_`X_abŠdefYXghZ]i_]bjdbXYd

?&=>?@ A
BCC&
"'‹


#
"ByE
 "
#JByz
"')


165


 






 










! "#$$
%&'()*+,-%,./0123&%45'*6,*/71/%&1
89:;<=>?@ABCDE=@E?FGHIGJK?E?KIELFMGAEGN>EI@MKHB@@K@FB>LE=>?EIOP8QR STUVOUWX>YB>?ZELFKG>WUSXBYXOPYG<FME[89\=>?EIFME]GN^B>?AG?EIBFE^K>LGAE MG=@K>_>BFKG>B]GD`ELFKJEaOP8QRSTUVOUbXBYXcYB>?STUVPbcXDYXcYdV9KIELF MGAEGN>EI@MKHB@@K@FB>LEABCK>L]=?Ee
fZ=D@K?KgK>_K>FEIE@FIBFE@B>?AGIF_B_EHIK>LKHB]BAG=>F@FGABhE]GB> HBCAE>F@B<<GI?BD]EViMK@ABCK>L]=?EABhK>__IB>F@FGIE?=LEFME E<<ELFKJEK>FEIE@FIBFE@LMB>_E?G>FME]GB>@VjGN^GI>G^K>FEIE@F @=DGI?K>BFE]GB>@LB>B]@GDE=@E?FGIE?=LEGJEIB]]]GB>IEHBCAE>F BAG=>F@V
fQK>B>LK>_FMELG@FG<BLk=KIK>_HIGHEIFCB]IEB?CGLL=HKE?DCIE>FEI MG=@EMG]?@BFFEIA@>EE?E?FGABhEFMEH=ILMB@EB<<GI?BD]EV flBCK>_B]]GIBHBIFG<FMEHIEAK=AG>DEMB]<G<FMEMGAED=CEI<GI AGIF_B_EK>@=IB>LEIEk=KIE?=H<IG>FDCBHIKJBFEAGIF_B_EEV flBCK>_B>CGIB]]G<FMEIEB@G>BD]EL]G@K>_LG@F@B@@GLKBFE?NKFMFME MGAEH=ILMB@EG>DEMB]<G<FMEMGAED=CEIV
flBCK>_=HFGSUHEILE>FG<FME?GN>HBCAE>FIEk=KIE?DCFME AGIF_B_EE<GIFMEH=ILMB@EG>DEMB]<G<FMEMGAED=CEIVXiMESU HEILE>F]KAKFBFKG>G>?GN>HBCAE>FB@@K@FB>LEK@B@FBF=FGIC IEk=KIEAE>FV;IB>FEEIELGI?@A=@F?GL=AE>FNMBFBAG=>FG< ?GN>HBCAE>FK@IEk=KIE?DCFMEAGIF_B_EEmB>?A=@FL]EBI]C ?K@FK>_=K@MDEFNEE>FMEBAG=>FG<89:;<=>?@DEK>_HIGJK?E?<GI ?GN>HBCAE>FB@@K@FB>LEJ@VFMEBAG=>FHIGJK?E?<GI@=D@K?KgK>_FME AGIF_B_EHIK>LKHB]m<GIL]G@K>_LG@F@m<GIAGIF_B_EK>@=IB>LEmEFLVY 
n2opq
frst2uvw0x'2u0vpyw0xzu0{p3%&'()*-.,,zwv|32}w{p{w0~20u0~ow20 €wo{w3p~o2‚p2€0p3vw|7vvwvo70~pz3p|23o2uvw0x~2u0vpyw0xu0{p3 ‚7o3wƒ~2{p.6„z7v7vp|737op7~ow}wo
-
frs3psp337yvp3}w~pvz2‚p2€0p3vw|p{u~7ow20|32x37‚vz23xp0p37y †u{xpo‡sw070~w7y~2u0vpyw0xwv|32}w{p{o22‚p†u
p3vw0~20u0~ow20
€wo2‚p2€0p3vw|7vvwvo70~pzopvp3}w~pv73p~20vw{p3p{7~ow}wo 
{pyw}p3
~2vov7v|73o2s7.6ˆ7~ow}wo
-
f„yy3p~w|wp0ov2s7vvwvo70~p|32}w{p{u0{p3‚7o3wƒ~2{p.6ˆ‚uvo†p y2€‡‚2{p37opw0~2‚p70{op7~ow}wo
‚uvo‚ppoop‰Št07ow207y
2†p~ow}p-
f ‹0y
3p|23oop0u‚†p32s2uvp2y{vo7o3p~pw}p{2‚p2€0p3vw| 7vvwvo70~p7v7~~2‚|ywv‚p0ovs23.6ˆ-
 !
Œ
Ž



!


%&'()*+,-%,%/71/.123&%45'
*6,*/71/&1
REMBDK]KFBFKG>G<HIKJBFE]CGN>E?m@K>_]E^=>KFMGAE@V<[G=@K>_8G=>@E]K>_=>?EIOP 8QRSVWUUK@HIGJK?E?K>LG>`=>LFKG>NKFMIEMBDK]KFBFKG>mIEHGIF[G=@K>_8G=>@E]K>_ =>?EIABFIK‘LG?EWPj@EHBIBFE]CV<IE<EIIB]@EIJKLE@mGI_E>EIB]D=?_EF’<K>B>LKB] LG=>@E]K>_K@HIGJK?E?FGIE@K?E>F@K>LG>`=>LFKG>NKFMIEMBDK]KFBFKG>mFME@EIJKLE@BIE LG>@K?EIE?BLFKJKFC?E]KJEICLG@F@B@BHBIFG<BWP\BLFKJKFCV 166










 !"!#$%#&%'()*
+!#$%#%
,-./01213/3145467819/3-2:4;5-<0=12<15>?;13.3;448@48-7-8@/5-538-?1<-531/2 =513?AB6C4=?15>D4=5?-215>=5<-8EFDG,HAIJJ1?78491<-<15K45L=5K3145;13. 8-./01213/3145M8-7483C4=?15>D4=5?-215>=5<-8@/381NK4<-IFO?-7/8/3-2:AB6 8-6-88/2?-891K-?48>-5-8/20=<>-3P615/5K1/2K4=5?-215>1?78491<-<348-?1<-53?15 K45L=5K3145;13.8-./01213/3145M3.-?-891K-?/8-K45?1<-8-</K31913:<-219-8:K4?3?/?/ 7/8346/IFQ/K31913:A

G483.-8-./01213/314546=513?3./3;12278491<-3-@748/8:?.-23-84838/5?13145/2.4=?15> 6483.-.4@-2-??M=?-JRDA
S


T
UVW
XY


 !"!#$%#%'()*

+!#$%#%
,-./01213/314546.4=?15>=513?4;5-<P47-8/3-<0:/7=021K.4=?15>/=3.4813:Z[C\]A ^


_

XT
U`_a



W


!"!#$%#%'()*
+!#$%#%
,-./01213/3145467-8@/5-53.4=?15>4;5-<0:/7=021K-5313:43.-83./5/[C\A 
G483.-8-./01213/31454643.-87=021K2:4;5-<0=12<15>?3./3;12278491<-3-@748/8: ?.-23-84838/5?13145/2.4=?15>6483.-.4@-2-??M=?-JRDA b


c
XW`cddU
U`efgXh
f


 !"!#i%#%'()*

+!#$%#%
C4=?15>8-./01213/3145;13.3.-?42-7=874?-461@784915>-5-8>:-661K1-5K:Z-A>AM/ ;-/3.-81j/3145784>8/@]A

G48-5-8>:-661K1-5K:1@7849-@-53?347=021K.4=?15>=513?M=?-IFDk64843.-87=021K2: 4;5-<8-?1<-531/20=12<15>?M=?-IFlA
m


nUo

 !"!#i%#&%'()*
+!#$%#&%
\Kp=1?13145467847-83:340-8-./01213/3-<648.4=?15>AIFq@/:0-=?-<;.-3.-8 DlQq6=5<?;1227/:452:648/Kp=1?1314548648043./Kp=1?13145/5<8-./01213/3145A V


nfX


 !"!#i%#r%'()*
+!#$%#%
\22<-219-8:K4?3?Z15K2=<15>?3/66M43.-8<18-K3K4?3?M/5<?-891K-K4?3?]<18-K32:8-2/3-< 34K/88:15>4=3.4=?15>8-./01213/3145/K319131-?AsN/@72-?15K2=<-/778/1?/2M /8K.13-K3=8/2M-5>15--815>M/5<43.-87846-??145/2?-891K-?k78-7/8/314546;48t ?7-K161K/3145?/5<;48t;813-u=7?k24/5784K-??15>/5<=5<-8;81315>k?=89-:M?13-/5< =31213:72/5?k/7721K/3145784K-??15>A

IFC?.4=2<0-=?-<;.-53.-DlQq6=5<?/8-=?-<648/K31913:<-219-8:K4?3?15 1@72-@-5315>/784>8/@;.-8-3.-8-./01213/3145./8<K4?3?/8-7/1<;13.43.-8 6=5<15>?4=8K-?A

l4543=?-IFC6483.-K4?3?46/K3=/28-./01213/3145/5<<4543=?-13648K4?3? =58-2/3-<348=5515>/8-./01213/3145784>8/@Z-A>AM3-5/53P2/5<248<K4=5?-215>]A 
G48/<@151?38/3145/K319131-?K/881-<4=3/?7/8346>-5-8/2784>8/@/<@151?38/3145Z/5<

3.=?5438-p=18-<34@--3/5/3145/240L-K319-]M=?-K4<-EI\A 167





















 !"#$%
$
&'()*


+,"-$"&.(&
/(
0123456789:;4<4=:=415:>=4?4=483@4=9=98A74B:7C61:<1D8?:<2:=4569123456254=3D17 <8:EFA:45=9:G:7E3:5E78E2>456<8:EF;:38EA:45=H<8:E9:G:7E345254=3I J17<8:EF;:38EA:45=H<8:E9:G:7E33>78854561DA873153K238LMNI O PQR
ST

UVTWQ
PQXPQ
WYQ

ZX[\]^__

 !"#$%
$`&a()*

+,"-$"&.(&
$(
0123456387?4>83K8b>8A=0123456c12538<456K25E87decJfMIgLLK4532AA17=1D=98 0hijN7167:BK8<464;<825E87decJfMkLIdLglmnI
o PQXPQ
WYQ

ZX[\]^__YRQppPqrUP

PQ
TS


 !"#$%
$`&a()*

+,"-$"&.(&
$(
0123456c12538<456K25E87decJfMIgLLK4532AA17=1D:0hijFD25E8E9123456 :3343=:5>8A7167:BI
  PQXPQ
WYQ

ZX[\]^__YXPsQTPtuXvw




PQ\
u
W
P

 !"#$%
$
)*,xyz{)|

+,"-$"&.(&
(
0123456c12538<456K25E87decJfMIgLLK4532AA17=1Dc}~:3343=8E9123456 789:;4<4=:=415:>=4?4=483K45><2E456ge€Fge}KgeJFgeK:5Eg‚€I ] XP

UƒPT



 !"#$%
$
&y()*

+,"-$"&.(&-(
„:<:7483:5E1?8798:E>13=3:331>4:=8E@4=9A71A87=C453A8>=4153:5ED1<<1@F2A:>=4153 l32>9:3<86:<A71>88E4563nE478>=<C78<:=8E=1=9885D17>8B85=l51=>1778>=415n1D3=:=8 :5E<1>:<>1E83I

J17=98789:;4<4=:=4159:7E>13=31D>1778>=456>1E8?41<:=4153K238=98:AA71A74:=8 789:;4<4=:=415>1E825E87=98ge
387483I
† \



WPT

S
P

 !"#$%
$
&‡(
f89:;4<4=:=4151D943=174>;24<E4563D177834E85=4:<238Iˆ38B:=74b>1E8g‚€@985=98 A78387?:=41517783=17:=4151D943=174>:<<C34654D4>:5=D8:=278343=9815<C@17m;8456 E158ID943=174>A78387?:=415@17m43E158:3A:7=1D1=9879123456789:;4<4=:=415K=985 238=9878<8?:5=ge
B:=74b>1E8I

‰U Š‹ŒŽ‘’“”•–’–—˜’”‘•™š•‘›œ•—ž‘•‘“Ÿ ¡¢– ˜£¤•¥”–¦§¨

+,"-$"&.(&
-(
€>=4?4=483=1A78?85==98:;:5E15B85=:5EE8=87417:=4151D9123456:>©2478E=971269 =:bD178><13278Iª983845><2E8B:m45683385=4:<78A:473=1=989123456:5EA:C456 1A87:=4568bA85383=1B:45=:454=39:;4=:;4<4=CI
168


 







 


!
"
#$%&
$


'()
*
%
'+

,
%*+
',


$&)#
-'

#$-#*$&%
*,
''.*(
$&
*
'/0'
#

+

12"34($'


'-,
'
*
((.*(&$
'

&$
'

/
 


561
7 1
731
72
#$%&
$

8#
'


'


*,
(.*(&$
'

(
'+
,
%*+
'*9

/
:; <
=>?

>
 @AB?
CDAD
>
CEF
GH

D
>IJ GBKD
>
LMNOPQRSTLSLUVWUXWYZML[\NQXSQUVWULW
]
#&%'(++
%^'$
%**
)/_(#
**
)
*,
%)8'
1
2"34.($'

#&
%+
`
abcdefgefhiegjdhdkclmndkdeoppqedrdeedscgoltrouosd fhiegjdhdkclvwx
2
'(
,%'
/

y+


'
,

#&%'(*,
%)8'
++
%^'$
%**
)1
$


2z('(
$$

,
%*+
'
'+*,
+
'
++
%^'$
%



1$


3/
:{| H

D
>IJ GBKD
>@|}B
K

 I

KK

 LMNOPQRSTLSXUVWYZML[\N
QXSQUVWU~MW
'€$
'1%
'
(
$$

1

+&%'-%'(#
*$*

(

'-'$
%*
*+'-++
%^'$
%
,
%*+
'/

,

+$
&

$&)#
-'

&)*$&%*,
''.*(
/
:{‚ H

D
>IJ GBKD
>@J ƒD>KDBBD





LMNOPQRSTLSXUVWYZML
[\NQXSQUVWU~MW
„

18
1*'-1%'
*1#
+*,
+
'
++
%^'$
%



/
3%
'%$

#
'
%%'(*$&%+*,
+
'
1
$#
#

'
$'(



'#$-#++
%^'$
%

/
3,

+$

&

$&)#
-'

&)*$&%*,
''.*(
/
:{H H

D
>IJ GBKD
>@‚B
G

|}B
K

 †H KDB
 †<
=>?

>
 
LMNOPQRSTLSXUVWYZML[\NQXSQUVWU~MW
€$
'1'
$'1
#&%'(++
%^'$
%&$%'-
/
2
,

+$
&

$&)#
-'

&)*$&%*,
''.*(
/
:{
 H

D
>IJ GBKD
>@E=
DJ
D

KLMNOPQRSTLSXUVWYZML[\N
QXSQUVWU~MW
2++
%^'$
%+*,
+
'
',

&)#

‡

/
",


+$
&

$&)#
-'

&)*$&%*,
''.*(
/
169






















 !"#$%&
%'()*+,
-. #'%#(/*(0$*
12343524647727843598:;<2=489>:<?;<:>28@A723977978:B>:<9C4D;69E45FA2<9;<:;9<8GH 5694<78<A58A<97H@A26IH9C;43I:<<9J4@26284894@A26I23KH;A<5J4799FA2;D938H:< ;<:=2I9:;9<4823K54;2846L1:<D7:>47727843592356AI96:437H6:43KA4<438997H43I K<4387L

M28J:399C59;82:3H479;4<489NOP4582=28GDA78@9798A;>:<945J@A7239774772789IL Q>434582=28G2754<<29I:A8A3I9<RST1UVWXLRXOB4EBSEB=2E:<RST1U VWXLSOYB@EBSEB=2EHZ:@4KK<9K482:327466:[9IH43I466@A723977974772789IIA<23K4 ;<:K<4DG94<D4G@95:D@239I23:394582=28GL
 






\]
^




 !"#$%&
%'(_*+,
-. 
#'%#(/*(0$*
`95J3254647727843598:>:<?;<:>28@A72397797H2356AI23K[:<a7J:;7H477278435923 I9=96:;23K@A723977;6437HD4<a9823KH43I<9>9<<4678:693I9<7:<895J32546<97:A<597L P67:A79NOb>:<4582=28GI962=9<G5:787962K2@69A3I9<RST1UVWXLRXYB5EL 
c





\d





 !"#$%&
%0(+*+,

-. #'%#(/*(

*e
 !"#$%&f
(_*
1234352464772784359H895J325464772784359H:<K939<467A;;:<879<=25978::[39<743I I9=96:;9<7:>D25<:9389<;<2797LPD25<:9389<;<279274@A723977[28J>2=9:<>9[9< 9D;6:G997H2356AI23K8J9:[39<B7EL`J94582=28GDA78@9I972K39I8:9C56A72=96G79<=9 D25<:9389<;<2797L

M28J:399C59;82:3H479;4<4894582=28GDA78@9798A;>:<945JD25<:9389<;<279 4772789ILQ>434582=28G2754<<29I:A8A3I9<RST1UVWXLRXOB4EBSEB=2E:<RST1U VWXLSOYB@EBSEB=2EHZ:@4KK<9K482:327466:[9IH43I4664772789I@A72397797D4G@9 5:D@239I23:394582=28GL
 
170
Resources: FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 Total Annual Grant Allocation 1,305,306 $ 1,288,951 $ 1,183,432 $ 1,206,775 $ 1,184,832 $ 6,169,296 $ CARES Act (CDBG-CV) 1,507,850 - 182,944 108,655 - 1,799,449 Program Income - - 228,529 569,432 127,137 897,961
Prior Year Resources - - 70,189 543,325 - 631,677
Total CDBG Resources 2,813,156 $ 1,288,951 $ 1,665,094 $ 2,428,187 $ 1,311,969 $ 9,498,383 $ Expenditures: CDBG
Administration (20%) 137,900 $ 264,000 $ 264,000 $ 268,650 $ $ 256,000 $ 1,208,713 Total Administration 137,900 $ 264,000 $ 264,000 $ 268,650 $ 256,000 $ 1,208,713 $ Public Services (15%):

Kings Tulare Homeless Alliance - Point-In-Time Count/LINC 18,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 98,000 Family Services - Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) Match 30,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 225,000 Family Services - Street Outreach Case Management 47,000 - - - - 47,000 Kings View PATH Program - Housing Flex Funds 20,000 25,000 35,000 50,000 20,000 150,000 Fair Housing Services 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 37,500 United Way of Tulare County - Rental/Utility Assistance - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Elevate Community Services - Majestic PSH Match - - - - 25,000 25,000 Eden House Transitional Bridge Housing 39,500 - - - 125,000 164,500 CV Food Assistance 425,551 - - - - 425,551
CV Subsistence Payments 1,200,000 182,944 90,492 1,473,436 Total Public Services 1,787,551 $ 147,500 $ 295,444 $ 217,992 $ 247,500 $ 2,695,987 $ Habitat for Humanity - Emergency Repair and ADA Program $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ Self-Help Enterprises - Senior Mobile Home Repair Program - 100,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 325,000 Code Enforcement Services In Low-Moderate Income Areas 196,400 180,000 185,000 175,000 175,000 911,400 Total Affordable Housing 196,400 $ 330,000 $ 310,000 $ 250,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,386,400 $ Visalia Navigation Center Development $ 691,305 $ 447,451 $ 760,669 $ 1,285,055 $ - $ 3,184,480 ADA Audible Pedestrian Signals 100,000 - - - 100,000
ADA Transit Pathway Project - - 34,980 406,490 58,469 499,940 ADA Compliance Projects - ADA Tree Wells Project - - - - 400,000 372,863 Park Improvements - Lincoln Oval Park Fence and Lighting - - - - 50,000 50,000 Total Public Facility Improvements 691,305 $ 547,451 $ 795,649 $ 1,691,545 $ 508,469 $ 4,207,283 $ Total CDBG Expenditures 2,813,156 $ 1,288,951 $ 1,665,094 $ 2,428,187 $ $ 1,311,969 $ 9,498,383 Resources: FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 Total HOME Grant Allocation 543,236 $ 507,520 $ 546,791 $ 538,976 $ 462,604 $ 2,599,127 $ Program Income 200,000 200,000 200,000 169,396 769,396
Prior Year Resources 2,115,595 1,091,274 34,115 425,000 3,665,984 Total HOME Resources 543,236 $ 2,823,115 $ 1,838,065 $ 773,091 $ 1,057,000 $ 7,034,507 $ HOME Administration 63,939 $ 149,880 $ 70,750 $ 65,324 $ $ 56,000 $ 405,893 Total Administration 63,939 $ 149,880 $ 70,750 $ 65,324 $ $ 56,000 $ 405,893 Tenant-Based Rental Assistance 40,000 $ 24,500 $ 5,425 $ - $ - $ 69,925 $ Sequoia Village - 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000
The Lofts Project 439,297 1,148,735 567,788 634,375 - 2,790,195 NW 5th Avenue 5 Single-Family Developments - - 1,029,102 - - 1,029,102 NW 5th Avenue 5 Homebuyer Assistance - - 165,000 73,392 - 238,392 Rancho Colegio Project - - - - 1,001,000 1,001,000
Total Affordable Housing 479,297 $ 2,673,235 $ 1,767,315 $ 707,767 $ 1,001,000 $ 6,628,614 $ Total HOME Expenditures 543,236 $ 2,823,115 $ 1,838,065 $ 773,091 $ 1,057,000 $ 7,034,507 $ Affordable Housing:

Public Facility Improvements:

Affordable Housing:

Table 2: FY 2020/2021 - FY 2024/2025 HOME Activities
Expenditures:

Administration and Planning:

Table 1: FY 2020/21 - FY 2024/25 CDBG Activities
Attachment C: FY 2020/21 - FY 2024/25 ConPlan CDBG and HOME Activities 171
Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual CDBG Allocation 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 6,000,000 $ Program Income 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Prior Year Resources 400,000 - - 400,000
Total CDBG Resources 1,700,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 6,900,000 $ Administration (20%) 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,200,000 $ Public Services (15%) 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 900,000 Single-Family Home Repair Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Senior Mobile Home Repair Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Code Enforcement Low-Mod Income Areas 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 875,000 Emergency Shelter Development 905,000 505,000 - - - 1,410,000 Sidewalk ADA Improvements - - 505,000 355,000 505,000 1,365,000 Park Youth Improvements - - - - 150,000 150,000
Total CDBG Expenditures 1,700,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 6,900,000 $ Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual HOME Allocation 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ Program Income 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total HOME Resources 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 3,500,000 $ HOME Administration (10%) 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ Rancho Colegio Project 289,000 - - - - 289,000
Senior Housing Project 361,000 550,000 375,000 - - 1,286,000 Affordable Rental Housing Project - - 175,000 550,000 550,000 1,275,000 Tenant-Based Rental Assistance - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Total HOME Expenditures 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 3,500,000 $ Resources: FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Total Annual PLHA Allocation 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,075,000 $ Prior Year Resources 165,800 - - - - 165,800
Total PLHA Resources 580,800 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,240,800 $ PLHA Administration (5%) 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 20,750 $ 103,750 $ AOWH - Homeownership Activities (40%) 331,800 166,000 166,000 166,000 166,000 995,800 Emergency Shelter (19%) - - 76,250 76,250 76,250 228,750 Warming Center (19%) 76,250 76,250 - - - 152,500
Visalia Navigation Center Operational (18%) 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 380,000 Eden House Operational (18%) 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 380,000 Total PLHA Expenditures 580,800 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ 2,240,800 $ Expenditures:

Table 2: FY 25/26 - FY 29/30 Proposed PLHA Activities
Expenditures:

Expenditures:

FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30 Proposed CDBG, HOME, and PLHA Activities Table 3: FY 25/26 - FY 29/30 Proposed CDBG Activities
Table 2: FY 25/26 - FY 29/30 Proposed HOME Activities
172
2024/2025 CDBG Low-and Moderate-Income Areas (LMA)
173
CDBG Low-Mod Census Tracts, via HUD Mapping Tool.
174
City of Visalia, CA
Draft Windshield Survey
September 2024
175
Windshield Survey

Table of Contents
Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 History of Visalia ............................................................................................................... 3 Methodology......................................................................................................................... 3 Boundaries ........................................................................................................................... 5 Boundary Map of Area Surveyed ...................................................................................... 6 Housing Data ....................................................................................................................... 7 Single-Family Homes ........................................................................................................ 7 Average Age of Housing Units .......................................................................................... 7 Number of Single-Family Homes Built Before 1980.......................................................... 8 Number of Bedrooms of Single-Family Homes ................................................................. 9 Price of Single-Family Homes ........................................................................................... 9 Physical Conditions Analysis.............................................................................................. 10 Roofing ........................................................................................................................... 11 Siding.............................................................................................................................. 12 Landscaping.................................................................................................................... 13 Fencing ........................................................................................................................... 14 Condition of Right-of-Way ............................................................................................... 15 Neighborhood Conditions................................................................................................ 16 Building Type Analysis ....................................................................................................... 17 Single-Family .................................................................................................................. 17 Multi-Family..................................................................................................................... 17 Mixed Use Neighborhoods.............................................................................................. 18 Summary............................................................................................................................ 18 176
Windshield Survey