Cities Index.
cc 2024 AR 01/23 speed humps on beaumont dr

Vista City Council
January 23, 2024

Document
cc 2024 AR 01/23 speed humps on beaumont dr
Meeting
January 23, 2024
Body
Vista City Council
Pages
17
Original file
23 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

ACTION:
____________________________
Clerk/Secretary
Department: Engineering Item No: C2
Prepared by:

Husam Hasenin, Traffic Engineering
Division Manager
Sally Rowley, Management Assistant Meeting Date: January 23, 2024 Approved by:

Greg Mayer, Director
John Conley, City Manager Agenda Location: Consent Calendar SUBJECT: SPEED HUMPS ON BEAUMONT DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the installation of speed humps on Beaumont Drive between Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road.

CORRELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS: Traffic: Continue to improve flow of traffic for all forms of travel, reduce congestion, and improve our roads and sidewalks.

PRIOR ACTION: On June 13, 2023, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2023-96, amending City Council Policy 600-07, Criteria and Procedures for Installation of Speed Humps (Vote: 4-1, Franklin Opposed).

On March 28, 2023, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2023-44, approving speed humps at certain locations in the City (Vote: 5-0).

On December 8, 2009, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2009-197, amending City Council Policy 600- 07 (Vote: 5-0).

On May 28, 1996, adopted City Council Resolution No. 96-42, establishing guidelines for the installation of speed humps as specified in Chapter 16 of the City of Vista Municipal Code (Vote: 5-0).

PRIOR TRAFFIC COMMISSION ACTION: On December 6, 2023, approved the installation of speed humps on Beaumont Drive between Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road (Vote: 5-1, Chairperson Vielma Opposed, Commissioner Alberto Absent).

STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT: The City received a request to evaluate the stretch of Beaumont Drive from Eucalyptus Avenue to Coventry Road for speed humps as a traffic calming measure. Staff conducted an evaluation of the road section using the criteria outlined in City Council Policy 600-07, Criteria and Procedures for Installation of Speed Humps. Please see Exhibit 1 for the speed hump evaluation. Staff determined that this section of Beaumont Drive meets the criteria for the installation of speed humps.

As required in City Council Policy 600-07, the residents submitted a petition for the installation of the speed humps. Exhibits 2 and 3 are the petition and petition verification map, respectively, which indicate that a majority of nearby residents are in support of the speed humps.

AGENDA
REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
Approved the installation of speed humps on Beaumont Drive between Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road. Vote: 5-0.

MEETING DATE: January 23, 2024 PAGE 2
SUBJECT: SPEED HUMPS ON BEAUMONT DRIVE
In October 2023, staff collected data that showed the prevailing speeds near 545 Beaumont Drive to be approximately 33 miles per hour. The speed study is attached as Exhibit 4. There have also been two reported accidents on Beaumont Drive between Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road in the past five years.

The adjacent properties have been notified that this proposal will be on the January 23, 2024 City Council agenda. Exhibits 5 and 6 contain a map of notified properties and the notice sent to the properties.

FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to install four speed humps is $30,000. Funding to install the speed humps is available in the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Capital Improvement Budget for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. 8361 Neighborhood Traffic Calming (source appropriation account no. 0026555.578999.8361).

EXHIBITS:

1.Speed Hump Evaluation

2.Petition

3. Petition Verification Map

4.Volume and Speed Study

5.Property Notification Map

6.Notice

7.Location Map

8.City Council Policy 600-07, Criteria and Procedures for Installation of Speed Humps 01/23/2024 C2 2 of 16

Fire Department
Fire Department Review and Approval YES NO
Conditions - Minimum of 80 Out of 100 Points Required

1.The street is a local residential or a collector street and is QRWa major or arterial street as defined by the City of Vista's Circulation Element. (25 points*)
YES NO

2.The installation of speed humps will not result in the diversion of traffic to a nearby parallel street (25 points*)
YES NO

3.6SHHGVWXG\ shows that the measured 85% percentile speed is 35 mph or more; or 60% of motorists exceed 25 mph. (15 points) YES NO

4.Street shall be no more than one lane in each direction. (10 points)YES NO

5. Adequate horizontal or vertical alignments and sight distance. (15 points)
YES NO

6. Street not scheduled for resurfacing within 16 months. (10 points)YES NO
Total Points:

Petition
Petition contains signatures from at least 51% of
adjacent residents shown in the city-provided map.

Satisfied Not Satisfied

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF VISTA

SPEED HUMP CRITERIA CHECK LIST
DDate:

SStreet: LLimits:

IInstructions: The following three steps must be met before proceeding to Traffic Commission and City Council approval.
,VWRWDOSRLQWPLQLPXPRI2XWRI3RLQWV5HTXLUHG" NO
<(6
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
24-Oct-2023
Beaumont Drive Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road
■
100

APPROVED

QUALIFIES
QUALIFIED ■
01/23/2024 C2 3 of 16
EXHIBIT 1

01/23/2024 C2 4 of 16
EXHIBIT 2

01/23/2024 C2 5 of 16

N

CITY OF VISTA
L I

PETITION MAP REQUESTING SPEED HUMPS
Petition Map for Proposed Speed Humps on Bea umont Drive between Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road must have signatures from 51 % of the 25 properties shown.

Ali Sohi -(760)643-5435 [email protected]
13/25=52%
Ali Sohi
11/06/2023
01/23/2024 C2 6 of 16
EXHIBIT 3

Day:City:Vista
Date:Project #:CA23_040207_005
Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 +Total 0:00 AM 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
1:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
2:00 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
3:00 0 1 0 2 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
4:00 0 1 1 6 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16
5:00 0 0 8 15 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
6:00 2 5 14 36 28 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88
7:00 10 39 104 88 28 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 276
8:00 6 13 43 53 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141
9:00 0 4 11 46 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89
10:00 0 1 13 45 21 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 84
11:00 1 9 22 46 31 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 112
12:00 PM 4 3 14 45 31 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99
13:00 1 11 29 41 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98
14:00 6 25 72 82 32 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 219
15:00 0 5 12 68 50 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 147
16:00 0 0 17 57 50 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 135
17:00 1 5 29 70 47 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 161
18:00 0 7 25 43 23 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 103
19:00 0 1 19 36 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77
20:00 0 1 15 25 22 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 69
21:00 0 0 7 14 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
22:00 0 1 1 9 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
23:00 0 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
31 132 457 837 482 77 13 5 2034
2%6%22%41%24%4%1%0%100%
19 73 216 344 174 29 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 863
1%4%11%17%9%1%0%0%42%
7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 11:00 7:00 10:00 4:00 7:00
10 39 104 88 31 5 2 1 276
12 59 241 493 308 48 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 1171
1%3%12%24%15%2%0%0%58%
14:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 14:00
6 25 72 82 50 11 3 1 219
AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume %Volume %Volume %Volume %
417 21%197 10%296 15%1124 55%
Summary
ADT
2034
PercentilesStreet Name
Beaumont Dr
85th
33 95th
35 50th
27 Average
27 15th Direction
22 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
545 Beaumont Dr
10/3/2023
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
All Speeds
Tuesday
Volume
PM Volumes
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Volume
Directional Peak Periods
01/23/2024 C2 7 of 16EXHIBIT 4

550
522
508
444
402
525
535
405
410
504
480
411
450
516
573
569
502
486
532
427
530
500
510
549
555
515
470
498
475
490
514
512485
545
565
460
440
419
401
559
439
1081 1131
1211
1043
1080
1035
1212
1085
1077
1051
1071
1090
10501042
1093
1115
1058
H
I
L
L
W
A
Y

D
R

MARLIN DR
BEAU
M
O
N
T

C
R

EUCALYP
T
U
S

A
V

COVENTRY

R
D
Unnamed
BEA
U
M
O
N
T

D
R
T
I
G
E
R

T
A
I
L

L
N

TIGER TA
I
L

R
D

EUCALYP
T
U
S

A
V
B
E
A
U
M
O
N
T

D
R
U
n
n
a
m
e
d
Unnamed
Unnam
e
d
I
Notification Map
Speed Humps on Beaumont Drive between Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road City of Vista
01/23/2024 C2 8 of 16
EXHIBIT 5

January 9, 2024
Subject: Speed Humps on Beaumont Drive
Dear
Residents have expressed concern with speeding on Beaumont Drive and requested the installation of speed humps on Beaumont Drive between Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road.

The residents have submitted a petition in support of their request. The installation of speed humps requires the approval of the Traffic Commission and City Council.

The proposal was approved by the Traffic Commission on December 6, 2023. The proposal will be presented to the City Council meeting on Tuesday, January 23, 2024, at 5:30 pm. This is a public meeting that is open to the public.

The meeting is planned to be held in the City Council Chambers at the Civic Center located at 200 Civic Center Drive. Please check the meeting agenda for further instructions or in case of a change to the meeting format. The meeting agenda will be available on the City’s website, www.cityofvista.com , by Wednesday, January 17, 2024.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
[âátÅ lA [táxÇ|Ç
Husam Y. Hasenin
Traffic Engineering Division Manager
760.643.5411
[email protected]
01/23/2024 C2 9 of 16
EXHIBIT 6

EUCAL
Y
P
T
U
S

A
V
B
E
A
U
M
O
N
T

D
R

TIGER TA
I
L

R
D

CRESCENT DR
H
I
L
L
W
A
Y

D
R
AL
T
A

V
I
S
T
A

D
R
AM
B
E
R

L
N

MARLIN DR
Unnamed

LEXINGTON DR
ALE
S
T
A
R

S
T
PEACH

G
R
O
V
E

L
N
T
O
R
O
L
E

C
R
C
R
E
S
C
E
N
T

L
N
VIS
T
A

G
L
E
N
N

L
N
QUIG
G

P
L
COVENT
R
Y

R
D
BEAU
M
O
N
T

C
R
T
I
G
E
R

T
A
I
L

L
N

BEAUMON
T

D
R
Un
n
a
m
e
d
AL
T
A

V
I
S
T
A

D
R
Un
n
a
m
e
d
Unnamed
Unnamed
U
n
n
a
m
e
d
LOCATION:

SUBJECT:

DATE:January 23, 2024
Speed Humps
Beaumont Drive between Eucalyptus Avenue and Coventry Road I
FO
O
T
H
I
L
L

D
R
Un
n
a
m
e
d
SR
7 8

E
B
S S
A
N
T
A

F
E

A
V

PHILLIPS ST
VALE

T
E
R
R
A
C
E

D
R
SUNR
I
S
E

D
R
VA
L
L
E
Y

D
R
N

C
I
T
R
U
S

A
V

CATALINA AV

EDGEHILL RD
PA
L
M

D
R
Site
01/23/2024 C2 10 of 16EXHIBIT 7

Vista City Council Policy
600-07 (1)
600-07 CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR INSTALLATION

OF SPEED HUMPS

PURPOSE
To provide uniformity in considering requests for speed humps, the following standards, selection criteria, procedures and installation guidelines are adopted for use by the City Engineer, Traffic Commission and City Council.

POLICY

1. Standards and Selection Criteria
a.Speed humps may be used on those local residential streets whose primary function is to provide access to abutting residences or on collector streets. Speed humps shall not be used on major and arterial roadways as designated in the Circulation Element of the General Plan of the City of Vista. b.Street segments shall be without severe vertical or horizontal alignment. A speed hump shall be visible for at least 200 feet.
c.The measured 85th percentile speeds shall be greater than 35 mph or 60 percent of the measured speeds shall be in excess of the posted speed limit. d.The street shall not be an important access route for emergency vehicles as determined by the City's emergency services departments. e.Speed humps shall not be installed on streets when it is anticipated that traffic will be diverted to another local residential street.
f.The street must consist of one travel lane in each direction. g.Speed humps will not normally be installed on isolated blocks along a continuous street or on a relatively short (less than 800 feet) cul-de- sac. h.The street shall not be scheduled for resurfacing during the next 16 months.

2.Procedures
a.The City's adopted policies and procedures for the installation of speed humps will be made available to all interested parties.
b.A resident of a local residential street, who believes the residents on that street will support the installation of speed humps will submit a request in writing to the City Traffic Engineer. The Traffic Engineer will consult with the City's emergency 01/23/2024 C2 11 of 16
EXHIBIT 8

Vista City Council Policy
600-07 (2)
services departments in making a determination of whether the street in question is eligible for further consideration for the installation of speed humps, i.e., the street is consistent with the City's policies for the installation of speed humps.

The City Traffic Engineer will complete Speed Hump Criteria Checklist (Exhibit A) to make the determination of satisfying the City's policy. c.Upon determination that a street is not eligible for speed humps, the resident of the street will be notified in writing giving the reason why the street is not eligible.

The resident of the street will be given 15 days to appeal the decision in writing to the City Engineer. If the City Engineer concludes the Traffic Engineer's decision is valid, the resident may appeal the City Engineer's decision to the Traffic Commission. The Traffic Commission will then consider the resident's appeal and determine if the City Engineer's decision should be overruled and allow the request to continue. The Traffic Commission's decision to overrule the City Engineer will identify the reasons and special circumstances to allow further consideration of speed humps on the requested street. If the Traffic Commission rejects the appeal, the matter may still be appealed to the City Council provided that 60 percent of the residents on the street sign the petition (Exhibit B) in support of speed humps.
d.Upon determination that a street is eligible for further consideration, the resident of the street will be advised to submit a petition (Exhibit B) from abutting the property owners or residents indicating that a clear majority (51 percent or more) support the installation of speed humps on their street. Staff will prepare a map of the properties required to sign the petition to aid residents in their signature gathering effort. The petition forms provided by the City will state: "If there is subsequently a desire by residents to remove the speed humps, the humps will only be considered for removal after receipt of a petition from a substantial majority (51 percent or more) asking for removal along with a guarantee to provide sufficient funds for removal as determined by the City Engineer." The sponsor of the petition is required to contact every resident of the abutting properties of the subject street. If a resident is against the speed humps, the word "OPPOSED" will be noted on the petition signature space. If the sponsor is unable to contact a resident, "NO CONTACT" will be noted on the petition signature space with dates and times that the contact was attempted. It is required that the sponsor make at least two attempts on separate days to contact a resident.

Any petitions submitted prior to the eligibility determination by City staff will not be processed ahead of schedule and shall be subject to return if all required information on the installation of speed humps is not included thereon. e.Upon verification of the petition, the Traffic Engineer will make traffic speed and 01/23/2024 C2 12 of 16

Vista City Council Policy
600-07 (3)
volume measurements, review the traffic accident history for the street in question, and determine acceptable locations for speed humps. f.Upon completion of the study, City staff will prepare an agenda item for consideration by the Traffic Commission. City staff will notify the properties on the subject street of the proposal for speed humps on. The Traffic Commission will then hold a hearing on the request and either approve or disapprove the request. If the Traffic Commission denies the request, the resident may appeal the decision to the City Council. The appeal to the City Council must be made within 30 days of the Traffic Commission's action.
g.The recommendation of the Traffic Commission to install speed humps will be forwarded to the City Council for approval.
h.In the event the number of requests for speed humps exceeds the funds available, the City Engineer will rank the requests in a recommended order of priority and submit these recommendations to the Traffic Commission for approval. The priority list recommended for approval will be based on traffic accidents, speeds, traffic volumes, and comments of the City's emergency services departments. The City Engineer will set forth the basis for the recommended priorities in a report accompanying the priority list.

Unless there is an overriding consideration such as high incidence of speed- related accidents, priorities will be normally established by multiplying the percentage of motorists exceeding 25 mph by the 24-hour traffic volume of the street in question. A street yielding the highest numerical value resulting from the above consideration will be considered to have the highest priority for speed humps. Depending on the number of petitions received and the types of streets involved, it is possible that a "cut-off speed" (perhaps an 85th percentile speed of 30 mph) will be established, below which streets will not be considered for the program.
i.The physical installation of speed humps and the associated traffic control devices shall conform to design standards established by the City Engineer. j.The City reserves the right to remove any or all of the speed humps at any time at no cost to the property owner( s).

3.Installation Guidelines
a.Speed humps shall not be placed over manholes, watergates, junction chambers, etc.
b.Where possible, speed humps should be placed at property lines instead of mid- lot.
01/23/2024 C2 13 of 16

Vista City Council Policy
600-07 (4)
c.Where possible, speed humps should be placed adjacent to street lights. d.Hump Dimensions: The dimensions for the speed hump may vary from 3 to 4 inches in height and 12 to 20 feet in width. The City Engineer, with the City's emergency services departments, will examine the height and width of humps to determine the desired dimensions for installation of speed humps in the City. Full height shall extend to two feet from gutter and taper to join existing pavement at edge of gutter.
e.Spacing:
1)200 to 750 feet between humps.
2)25 feet to fire hydrants and manholes.
3)200 feet to intersections.
f.Warning Signs: "BUMPS AHEAD" signs shall be placed on either end of the street segment where speed humps are being installed.
g.Markings: "BUMP" pavement marking shall be placed in advance of each hump in both directions.
h.Notifications: Each resident on the street shall be notified in writing of the planned hump installation at least three weeks prior to construction. i.The City Engineer will develop standards for speed hump installation and markings.

HISTORY
Adopted May 28, 1996, Resolution No. 96-42
Amended December 8, 2009, Resolution No. 2009-197
Amended June 13, 2023, Resolution No. 2023-96
01/23/2024 C2 14 of 16

Fire Department
Fire Department Review and Approval YES NO
Conditions - Minimum of 80 Out of 100 Points Required

1.The street is a local residential or a collector street and is not a major or arterial street as defined by the City of Vista's Circulation Element. (25 points*)
YES NO

2.The installation of speed humps will not result in the diversion of traffic to a nearby parallel street (25 points*)
YES NO

3. Speed study shows that the measured 85th percentile speed is 35 mph or more; or 60% of motorists exceed 25 mph. (15 points) YES NO

4.Street shall be no more than one lane in each direction. (10 points)YES NO

5.Adequate horizontal or vertical alignments and sight distance. (15 points)
YES NO

6.Street not scheduled for resurfacing within 16 months. (10 points)YES NO Total Points:

Petition
Petition contains signatures from at least 51% of adjacent residents shown in the city-provided map. Satisfied Not Satisfied Summery:

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF VISTA

SPEED HUMP CRITERIA CHECK LIST
Date:

Street: Limits:

Instructions: The following three steps must be met before proceeding to Traffic Commission and City Council approval.
01/23/2024 C2 15 of 16

Vista City Council Policy
600-07 (6)

EXHIBIT B

PETITION REQUESTING INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS
We, the undersigned residents of Street, from
Street to Street,
Do hereby request the City of Vista, California, to install speed humps on our street. We agree that if in the future that if we desire to remove the speed hump, the humps will only be considered for removal after receipt of a petition from a substantial majority (51% or more) asking for the removal along with a guarantee to provide sufficient funds for removal as determined by the City Engineer. The City reserves the right to remove any or all of the humps at any time at no cost to the property owners.

Neighborhood Representative:

Date
Signature
Head of Household) Address
Position
a)
Daytime
Phone
a)Support - S Opposed -0 No Contact - NC
01/23/2024 C2 16 of 16

ADD TO PACKET
rmm:

Husam Hasenin
To:

DAVE BEREMT
Cc:

Kadw Valdez
Subject
RE: Speed humps m Beaumont aid Coventry Road
Date:

Tuesday, lanuary 16, 202410:a 37 AM
Hello,
Thanks for taking the time to write with your input on the proposed speed humps on Beaumont Drive. Your input will be shared with the City Council prior to the 1/23/2024 meeting.

Thanks
Sam Hasenin, P.E., T.E.

Division Manager, Traffic Engineering Division
City of Vista
200 Civic Center Drive
Vista, CA 92094
(760)643-5411
From: DAVE BERENT-
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 20244:22 PM
To: Husam Hasenin
Subject: Speed humps on Beaumont and Coventry Road
IYou don't often gel email Gum-. Team 3y4 th i= imp�t
I have lived on Beaumont Drive, near the Beaumont Middle School, for 36 years. The speed humps, you propose, is to deter speeders. The only bad driving I have ever encountered are the crazy mamas that are dropping off and picking up their children at the school. You should have the sheriffs monitor Beaumont and Eucalyptus between 11:30 to 12:30 and 1:30 to 2:30 as school lets out. The amount of insane driving by these parents is horrendous. The speed is not the issue and hasn't been but the rudeness, dangerous maneuvering and disregard for safety and civility are unacceptable.

I will also mention that the speed humps are a pain in general. Speeding is not the issue. The issue is with the children's parents. The speed humps will do nothing to deter the parents bad driving near the school. A sheriff at the school for a couple of weeks, to tone down the parents, will save money instead of installing more speed humps.

C2

← All documents from this meeting