OF GIs
� � M
A g•
OA4r£D IANV ARyM1
Department: City Manager
® CITY COUNCIL
❑ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
❑ SUCCESSOR AGENCY
❑ BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT
❑ JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
Item No: D5
Prepared by: Imelda M. Huerta, Assistant City Manager Meeting Date: October 22, 2024 Approved by: John Conley, City Manager Agenda Location
Discussion
SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS AT MCC LELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT - OPPOSING
RESOLUTION
RECOMMENDATION: Discuss proposed City Council Resolution No. 2024- , opposing the acceptance of any commercial flights in and out of McClellan -Palomar Airport, and provide direction to staff.
PRIOR ACTION: None.
STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT: Councilmember O'Donnell requested the City Manager place an item on an upcoming agenda to discuss a Resolution opposing commercial flights in and out of McClellan - Palomar Airport. Commercial airline service through American Airlines is scheduled to return to McClellan - Palomar Airport in February 2025. This commercial service will have at least two daily commercial flights in and out of McClellan -Palomar Airport to Phoenix. The Palomar Airport Advisory Committee (PAAC) approved this item on September 19, 2024 (with a vote of 5-4) and it is scheduled to go before the San Diego County Board of Supervisors for final consideration on December 11, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT: No direct fiscal impact with this recommendation.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2024- , opposing the acceptance of any commercial flights in and out of McClellan -Palomar Airport
ACTION: Discussed opposition to commercial flights in and out of McClellan -Palomar Airport and adopted City Council Resolution No. 2024-174. Vote: 3-1-0 (Franklin Opposed, Melendez Absent) Clerk/Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CHARTERED CITY OF
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE ACCEPTANCE OF ANY
COMMERICAL FLIGHTS IN AND OUT OF MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT The City Council of the City of Vista does resolve as follows:
1. Findings. The City Council hereby finds and declares the following:
A. No commercial flights currently operate out of the McClellan -Palomar Airport.
B. Commercial airline service through American Airlines is scheduled to return to McClellan -Palomar Airport in February 2025. This commercial service will have at least two daily commercial flights in and out of McClellan -Palomar Airport.
C. Commercial flights will depart McClellan -Palomar Airport as early as 6:15 a.m. on a daily basis. This would be a direct violation of the current Voluntary Noise Abatement Plan (VNAP) period. Per VNAP, no jets may depart between the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.
Moreover, that departing 6:15 a.m. aircraft presumably would need to arrive into McClellan - Palomar Airport the evening prior to departure which would particularly impacting the residents of the City of Vista, as the City of Vista lies directly beneath the landing approach for arriving aircraft landing at McClellan -Palomar Airport.
D. The San Diego County Board of Supervisors' approval of a commercial flight contract with American Airlines would be in direct opposition to the County -owned McClellan Palomar Airport Voluntary Noise Abatement Plan (VNAP).
E. American Airlines would presumably use the Embraer E-175 or similar size jet for service into and out of McClellan -Palomar Airport. The Embraer E-175 holds 76 passengers.
As this jet is substantially larger than the aircraft currently using the airport, four tie -downs at the airport will be removed to make room for the E-175, indicating the need for more space to facilitate the E-175.
F. The Embraer E-175 Design Group Classification is C-III (wingspan between 79 feet and 118 feet) and the runway at McClellan -Palomar Airport is designed for B-II Design Group Classification aircraft (wingspan between 49 feet and 79 feet.) G. The stated takeoff field length needed for the Embraer E-175 at medium take -off weight is 5,656 feet. The McClellan -Palomar Airport runway length is currently 4,897 feet, or 759 too short.
H. While private aircraft have been using this airport with larger planes (C-II I and D- III) at pilot discretion and against FAA recommendations, the County allowing American Airlines to use Embraer E-175 or similar size aircraft overlooks certain safety standards put in place by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") designed to protect the public. At the same time, the County would be also be creating their own safety issue, providing a de facto reason for the County to justify airport runway expansion to meet the FAA criteria of a C-II I airport.
EXHIBIT 1
000292137
10/22/2024 D5 2 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CHARTERED CITY OF VISTA
PAGE 2
2. Action.
A. The Vista City Council opposes any commercial flights into and out of McClellan - Palomar Airport and implores the San Diego County Board of Supervisors to 1) support City of Vista residents and the City of Vista and surrounding communities by declining to sign any commercial flight contracts; 2) request that the San Diego County Board of Supervisors affirmatively show support of its existing VNAP policy; and 3) have the San Diego County Board of Supervisors affirm its stated goal to reduce GHG emissions to zero by 2035, by retaining the current smaller McClellan -Palomar Airport runway, designed to safely facilitate B-II aircraft, as it is today.
Adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Vista held on October 22, 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WALTER CHUNG, CITY ATTORNEY
IN
JOHN B. FRANKLIN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KATHY VALDEZ, CITY CLERK
By:
00029213 7Resolution Opposing Commerical Flights at McClellan Palomar Airpor.docx 4894-7048-2925, v. 1
10/22/2024 D5
3of3
ADD TO PACKET
From:
To: Public Comments
Subject: Carlsbad Airport
Date: Sunday, October 20, 2024 8:15:59 PM
I am writing to request that you please oppose any more airlines from flying out of Carlsbad. I have lived in Shadowridge for 14 years (and love it), but I am sad about the change in flight patterns over the years and they are now flying right over our area!
I so appreciate all that you do to look out for us!
Thank you,
Debra Geishart
Shadowridge homeowner
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
CHRIS BENTLEY
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Item D5- Airport Resolution
Date:
Sunday, October 20, 2024 2:46:51 PM
As a resident of San Marcos, and affected by the air traffic at Palomar Airport, I support the Vista Resolution that opposes commercial air traffic.
Darryl C. Bentley
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Dee Forsberg, Global Hire
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Item D5 - Airport Resolution
Date:
Monday, October 21, 2024 8:23:10 AM
B
I am writing to show support of "not allowing" commercial aviation at Palomar Airport.
This is an environmental and safety issue for all of the communities in North County.
Thank you,
Delinda Forsberg
A full -cycle executive search firm focusing on recruiting mid -level to executive management professionals
[email protected] - (760) 214-7458
Licensed and Insured
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From: Tania F
To: Public Comments
Subject: Item DS - Airport Resolution
Date: Sunday, October 20, 2024 4:42:25 PM
Dear Vista City Council,
Please implore the county to reject the proposal from American Airlines, in its current state, and revise/resubmit to be in compliance with county policies and federal policy.
• They can revise their plan to use a plane that fits the airport to promote safety and a departure time that is in compliance (only 45 minutes later).
• Would you want to board a plane that didn't have a safety rating for your airport? Please ask them to revise their plan to an appropriate aircraft type that is rated for the airport. There is no regulation that allows safety to be compromised. • Airport Sponsor Assurances (agreement between the federal government and the county), Noise Abatement through the FAR Part 150 and Airport Compliance Manual are a requirement. AA's proposal violates all of it. • To impose this kind of interference with Land Use (an exception to the Airport's Land Use Agreement), they would need to purchase avigation easements and compensate property owners. They have not done this. Those easements would devalue homes leading to a lower community tax base for the cities that they are impacting. Everyone would lose. With two international airports within a 45 minute drive of Carlsbad, they have other options that would not impose this level of impact.
Below are the documents and sections pertaining to reasons to push back/the county's responsibility.
It is a bad business plan that asks for exception to safety, regulations and community balance. Please be our checks and balances and escalate this to the county on behalf of the citizens.
Sincerely,
Tanja Freeman
Vista, CA
County Policy
Rules and Regulations:
httns:// www.sandiegocoun ov/content/dam/sdc/dnw/AIRPORTS/all/do
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AIRPORTS RULES AND REGULATIONS
Purpose of Rules and Regulations
Rules and Regulations as outlined in this document are designed to facilitate the safe and efficient operation of each airport. They are intended to be reasonable, non -arbitrary, and non-discriminatory and therefore apply equally to everyone. Lessees, Licensees, Pennittees, and users (Users) shall at all times comply with federal, State and local laws, ordinances, regulations, grant agreements, policies adopted by the Board of Supervisors, and policies, permits and orders of State or federal agencies with oversight responsibilities, including, without limitation, the Codes enumerated in Appendix A (collectively referred to herein as the "Laws"). Compliance with these Rules and Regulations is required from Users with leases, permits, licenses or other agreements with the County that require compliance with County policy. In the event of a conflict between the terms of a license, lease or other agreement and these Rules and Regulations, the terms of the license, lease or agreement shall control.
3. VIOLATION OF RULES AND REGULATIONS FORBIDDEN; SANCTIONS. A person who, acting on their own or through an officer, guest, invitee, agent, subtenant or employee, is in violation of these Rules and Regulations does not have, and is acting without, the permission of the County to remain on or to conduct any activity on an airport. Any such person who is in violation of these Rules and Regulations may be promptly ejected and removed from the airport, upon the order of the County's Director of the Department of Public Works, Director of Airports, or the airport manager, or by a law enforcement officer acting pursuant to the request of the airport manager or Director of Airports. Any person who is ejected and removed from the airport may be deprived of and refused the fixture use of the airport and of the airport facilities for such time as the Director of the Department of Public Works, Director of Airports or airport manager, may determine and order, and until such time as such person may accomplish to said Directors' or manager's satisfaction such remedial actions as said Directors or manager may order, notwithstanding any rights such person may otherwise have by virtue of any lease, license, permit or other agreement. The foregoing penalties are cumulative and supplemental to any penalties or remedies cognizable at law or set forth in any lease, license, permit or agreement for the use of a County airport.
2.13. NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES All persons operating aircraft from County airports shall comply with all noise abatement procedures, traffic patterns, and policies as may be established by County and acceptable to FAA. (SDCC §
85.441)
D5
ADD TO PACKET
2.8. RESTRICTION OF MOVEMENT
The airport manager may delay or restrict any ground movement or other operation or activity on the airport, and may refuse departure of aircraft from parking areas on the airport,
for any reason the airport manager deems necessary in the public interest or to protect public health, safety or welfare. (SDCC § 85.424)
10.2. OTHER REGULATIONS
In addition to the provisions of this chapter, all activities on County airports subject to a County issued license, lease, permit or other agreement shall comply with the Minimum
Standards and Policies and Procedures applicable to County airport activities, as well as all applicable Laws.
County Obligations
Board of Supervisors
httos:// www.counties.org(post/board-supervisors
"The Board of Supervisors may supervise the official conduct of county officers and require them faithfully to discharge their duties,"
Board of Supervisors F-044 Development of McClellan -Palomar Airport htips7Hcodelibr=.amlegal.com/codes/sandiegoco}policies/latest/sandiego_catF/f 044_development_of mc_clellannalomar airoort "l. The role of McClellan -Palomar Airport shall be to provide air transportation for the residents of North San Diego County and to facilitate general aviation support activities while minimizing noise impacts on surrounding areas and communities.
4. The County will operate the airport in accordance with any adopted FAA Part 150 Noise Compatibility Plan recommendations and in full compliance with any State or Federal mandated noise standards relating to the operation of a public airport. The program will recognize the Noise Element of the City of Carlsbad's General Plan and implement mitigation measures consistent with State, Federal and FAA Grant Assurance." httns://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/sandiegocopolicies/latest/sandiego catA/a 114 county prevention policy Board of Supervisor Policy A-114 County Prevention Policy "Living Safely incorporates focus areas, which include Preparedness, Prevention, Protection, Accountability, and Rehabilitation to ensure that residents are protected from crime or abuse; neighborhoods are safe to work, live, and play; and communities are resilient to disasters and emergencies."
Office of Ethics
https://www . sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/cao/docs/elspstmt.pdf
SIX GENERAL PRINCIPLES
The six General Principles listed below are intended to guide and assist County employees in adhering to the Standards of Conduct and to help all of us do the right thing.
1. Treat members of the public and fellow employees respectfully, fairly and honestly at all times.
2. Perform your duties in compliance with all federal, state and local laws, and avoid any involvement in illegal, unethical or improper conduct.
3. Conduct your official County duties in conformance with the County's policies and procedures, and in accordance with the highest standards of ethical and legal conduct.
4. Ensure that County funds and property are used with extreme care, guided by prudent judgment and good business practices.
5. Create a work environment that promotes open and honest communications, and encourages raising ethical concerns without fear of retribution or retaliation.
6. Assume responsibility for knowing, understanding and having a practical working knowledge of the laws and regulations applicable to your job.
FAA
Minimum Standards
httns:// www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/Order 5190.613_Com12liance_Ch93.ndf PDF page 27
When safety issues are identified, however, prompt corrective action is expected.
PDF page 50
4.6. Federal Obligations under the Basic Grant Assurance Requirements. This section discusses the different assurance lists and airport grant programs. The current grant assurances are available at: www.faa.gov/airports/ai42/grant assurances/.
D5
ADD TO PACKET
*Note: This section addresses noise as a requirement, not a voluntary program PDF Page 66
Rights and Powers. Grant Assurance 5, Preserving Rights and Powers, prohibits the airport sponsor from entering into an agreement that would deprive it of any of its rights and powers that are necessary to perform all of the conditions in the grant agreement or other federal obligations unless another sponsor/operator assumes the obligation to perform all such federal requirements. *Note: Finger pointing at who is in charge or can make the decision to push back is not allowable.
b. Safety and Efficiency Standards. Federal law and policies requiring airport sponsors to provide airport access to all types, kinds, and classes of aeronautical activity, as well as to the general public, include certain exceptions.
Exceptions to the general rule may apply when airport safety or efficiency would be compromised. *Note: Commerce cannot compromise safety.
PDF Page 211
Chapter 20: Compatible Land Use and Airspace Protection
20.1. Background. Land use planning is an important tool in ensuring that land adjacent to, or in the immediate vicinity of, the airport is consistent with activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including aircraft landing and takeoff. Ensuring compatible land use near federally obligated airports is an important responsibility and an issue of federal interest. In effect since 1964, Grant Assurance 21, Compatible Land Use, implementing Title 49 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 47107 (a) (10), requires, in part, that the sponsor: ... take appropriate action, to the extent reasonable, including the adoption of zoning laws, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In addition, if the project is for noise compatibility program implementation, it will not cause or permit any change in land use, within its jurisdiction, that will reduce its compatibility, with respect to the airport, of the noise compatibility program measures upon which federal funds have been expended. *Note: Noise abatement is not voluntary. There is a huge difference between the FAR Part 150 and the VNAPs.
The City of Vista was supposed to work with the FAA per PDF page 58 of the airport's Land Use Agreement. "City of Vista... Work with transportation agencies to control noise generated by both existing and future facilities and equipment; Prohibit the establishment of take off) flight or landing." patterns that would disturb the Vista Sphere of Influence (Noise Element, p. 5). https://www.lee-associates.com/elee/sandiego/LecLandTcam/Ponto/McClellan-Palomar ALUCP_20111.pddf State Code
Penal Code
:Wi
Any of the following persons shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than 90 days, a fine of not more than four hundred dollars ($400), or both such imprisonment and fine:
(2) Any person who maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud and unreasonable noise. *Note: This pertains to the intentional conflict of the requested departure time that does not comply with quiet hours for business operations and impact of residential zones.
Case Law
httns:// www.justia.com/aviation/air-rights-and-freedoms/?fbclid=IwZXhObgNhZWOCMTAAARIOv1KVpW6uf bhHXv5b- 51 SRXfotVkOOsaiV2ib-S1cOr9rMIG1awP7o aem AcKkhuOBrbXOmRCbZAtuDvMOnZPIXeJEPFR-EG9GMnJJ- eSwGC28iH6d Lx_JI7tmdsaD-PEyaI_OImOLAY2iDxw
Navigable Airspace and Private Property Rights
Under the Federal Aviation Act, the federal government holds the authority to regulate the use of US airspace. The Federal Aviation Administration sets the rules for navigable airspace, in which all US citizens have a public right of transit. Navigable airspace includes space at or above the minimum altitude for flights, as well as the space needed for aircraft to safely take off and land. Most airspace now falls within this definition, since some new types of aircraft have no minimum flight altitude. The FAA also holds statutory authority to buy navigation easements around airports that allow planes to take off and land.
Property owners are entitled to compensation when the government or a trespasser substantially impairs the use of their property. This includes the airspace above their land. Formerly, courts considered whether a flight remained in navigable airspace as a threshold question in deciding whether substantial impairment had occurred. Modern decisions generally do not consider whether a flight remained within navigable airspace in deciding whether a substantial impairment occurred and whether a property owner is entitled to compensation.
ra
D5
ADD TO PACKET
Section 4
"Flight in aircraft over the lands and waters of this State is lawful, unless at such low altitude as to interfere with the then existing use to which the land or water, or the space over the land or water, is put by the owner, or unless so conducted as to be imminently dangerous to persons or property lawfully on the land or waters beneath." Unless you have an avigation easement on your property title, yes you technically own the airspace over your home. httns://voutu.be/EcS1zI31 JR8?feature=shared
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Terri Acker
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Carlsbad airport
Date:
Sunday, October 20, 2024 5:46:28 PM
When I bought my home in downtown Carlsbad, I bypassed several other homes near San Marcos and Palomar airport road. Because of airplane noise. I absolutely emphatically do not support the expansion of the Carlsbad airport as they will have large planes flying directly over my home. This is not what I signed up for when I bought and the runway is too small and we already know they are planning on leaving at 6:15 in the morning, which is unacceptable.
This will affect many homeowners values and I urge you to defeat this proposition.
Thank you
Terri Acker
Carlsbad CA 92008
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Mike Herbst
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Item D-5 Airport Resolution
Date:
Monday, October 21, 2024 8:37:16 AM
Council Members,
I strongly support the Resolution to oppose any large commercial air service at Palomar Airport. I support your action to oppose the Country's proposed contract with American Airlines.
Thank you,
Michael Herbst
Carlsbad CA
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Jenene M
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Item D5-Airport Resolution
Date:
Sunday, October 20, 2024 2:46:33 PM
As a homeowner, my family and I support the City Council of Vista's findings and resolution of opposing any commercial flights into and out of McClellan -Palomar Airport.
Jenene McGonigal
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Christie Mullen
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
THANK YOU11
Date:
Sunday, October 20, 2024 4:45:05 PM
I am a twenty two year resident of Carlsbad. We are appalled at the increase of noise pollution and air pollution over the years! It's unbelievable! Thank you for being such a huge voice in this situation! Sent from my iPhone
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Dan Nadir
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
D5 airport resolution
Date:
Sunday, October 20, 2024 4:50:36 PM
Hello council,
Is like to register my support for for commercial aircraft flying out of Palomar airport. I have followed closely, and recently attended a Carlsbad meeting where frustrated residents expressed anger at American.
It is clear (and a board member stated this for the record) that all the anger is not really about commercial service like the American flight. They are all very angry at the private pilots and the instructors who turn too early and who generally have loud prop planes.
Commercial pilots will fly straight in jets that are more quiet then most people planes.
Remember, American, America West, and United all used to service Palomar.
More commercial service is good for North county business and residents.
Dan Nadir
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Kalim
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Item D5 Airport Resolution
Date:
Monday, October 21, 2024 8:58:00 AM
To whom it may concern.
I'm writing the council to please support the residents of Vista by adopting the resolution to oppose any large commercial air service at Palomar Airport. I commend the Vista City Council to be the first council to oppose the County's proposed contract with American Airlines. Airport traffic over my home from Palomar Airport is already very loud and disruptive and the contract with American Airlines will make it much worse.
Thank you for your consideration on this important matter Sincerely,
Kalim Owens
35 year resident of Vista
Sent from Mail for Windows
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Betty Randolph
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
McClellan -Palomar Airport
Date:
Thursday, October 17, 2024 10:54:53 AM
To the City Council,
I would like to know why the City should have any say in the City of Carlsbad and the County of San Diego regarding the expansion of McClellan -Palomar Airport. In my opinion this should not be addressed by Council. The Airport was started with the idea to improve travel to North County. * 1957 — County of San Diego picks Carlsbad site to replace Del Mar Airport. * 1958 — Construction begins.
* 1959 — Airport opens March 20, for daytime operations. * 1960 — Terminal building constructed
* 1961 — Airport expanded to a 4700' runway.
* 1962 — Terminal expanded, adding airport administrative offices. * 1973 — FAA control tower placed into operation March 26. * 1977 — Instrument landing system (ILS) and approach lights installed. * 1978 — Airport annexed into the City of Carlsbad.
* 1982- The Airport is named for aviator Gerald McClellan, a North County community leader.
If the City of Carlsbad and the County have decided to accepted commercial aircraft then it's been decided. The people who bought homes near there knew they were buying homes near an airport and need to accept the fact and get on with living.
This being fact, the Council should have no say and not be addressing the issue.
Sincerely,
Franchot & Betty Randolph
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
To: Public Comments
Subject: Item D5 Airport Resolution
Date: Monday, October 21, 2024 5:04:01 AM
To whom it may concern:
Please support item D5. The quality of north county is at stake and the airport development must be managed for the benefit of the citizens, not for profit.
Nichola Riggle
Sent from my Whone
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From: VickeV SVaae
To: Public Comments
Subject: D5 - Airport Resolution
Date: Sunday, October 20, 2024 1:27:16 PM
Vista Council:
Please vote in support of the Resolution presented in D5 of the Oct 22, 2024 Vista City Council meeting.
Thank you to Council Member O'Donnell for supporting Vista residents' quality of life and help the County reach its stated goal of zero GHG emissions by 2035.
Respectfully,
Vickey Syage
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Celia Taandiri
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Item D5 - Airport Resolution
Date:
Sunday, October 20, 2024 3:17:37 PM
Dear Vista City Council,
Please OPPOSE any large commercial air service at Palomar Airport.
Celia Taghdiri
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From: Cynthia Trevino
To: Public Comments
Cc: manager(nbcarlsbadca.gov; jason.haber(obcarlsbadca.gov; Salome.Tash(camail.house.gov; Rebecca. Smith 2(a)sdcounty.ca. gov; Cipriano.varaas(alsdcounty.ca.aov; Kyle.Krahel(cbmail.house. gov; priva.bhat- patelCa carlsbadca.gov; keith.blackburn(obcarlsbadca.gov; carolyn.luna(c carlsbadca.gov; teresa.acosta(a)carlsbadca.gov; c4fa.info(alo1b07.wixemails.com Subject: Item D5 - Airport Resolution
Date: Sunday, October 20, 2024 2:58:59 PM
Please support the residents of North County and adopt the Resolution. So that ALL residents impacted by Palomar airport's expansion plans can have an improved quality of life.
Cynthia Trevino
Voter, Homeowner, Taxpayer
D5
ADD TO PACKET
Vista D5 — 10/22/24
Please oppose commercial flights at the McClellan Airport.
The planes are carbon bombs, their fuel pollutes the air, causing health problems, especially for children. They cause obnoxious noise pollution.
Non-commercial flights have the same environmentally
harmful attributes. Actually, these planes are unnecessary polluting toys for the wealthy.
Please resolve that Vista would like to see the airport close and the land be used for socially and environmentally sound projects, such as opening an environmentally focused
business park. Let's invite job -creating, climate -friendly businesses to open in north county.
ADD TO PACKET
From:
To: Public Comments
Subject: Item D5 - Airport Resolution
Date: Sunday, October 20, 2024 5:18:01 PM
I want to add my support against Palomar Airport expanded service. My wife and I already deal with enough plane noise in Shadowridge.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Ursula Sack
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Item D5 - Airport Resolution
Date:
Monday, October 21, 2024 3:31:15 PM
Dear Vista City Council,
Guajome Alliance for Responsible Development (GuARD) is in favor of the resolution opposing commercial use of Palomar Airport. We encourage you to vote in favor of the resolution at tomorrow's meeting (October 22nd).
Thank you,
Ursula Sack
Secretary/Treasurer
Guajome Alliance for Responsible Development
(760)691-0964
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From: Riess, Nicolas
To: Public Comments
Subject: "Item D5 - Airport Resolution"
Date: Monday, October 21, 2024 2:32:02 PM
To whom it may concern,
I am writing in strong support of this City of Vista resolution to OPPOSE any large commercial air service at Palomar Airport.
Sincerely,
Humanities Dept.
Varsity Womens Soccer
Westview Surf Team
This email, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of the original message.
The Poway Unified School District (PUSD) is an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate in its employment practices or education programs. For our full Nondiscrimination policies, please visit the PUSD website.
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
Cindy Wardrip
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
ITEM D5-airport resolution
Date:
Monday, October 21, 2024 10:51:20 AM
I want to voice my support for the resolution.
Cindy Wardrip
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From: Judy White
To: Public Comments
Subject: Carlsbad Airport
Date: Monday, October 21, 2024 1:19:01 PM
Please support the recent vote by Carlsbad to disallow enlarging the runway and service at our "local" airport.
Judy White
D5
ADD TO PACKET
From:
PATRIM NIEME ER
To:
PublicC nvnerm
Subject:
1 e D 35
Date:
Tuesday, October 22, 202410:42:44 AM
I am a costal homeowner in Solamar Estates in Carlsbad said oppose the use of larger ancrafts at the Carlsbad airport. It is a safely risk to us all.
Patricia Niemeyer
Friendly Pl
Carlsbad, CA 92011
Sent from my iPhone
D5
From: IahiersCabme.com
To: Public Comments
Subject: Item D5 - Airport Resolution
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 8:38:22 AM
I am encouraging you to support this resolution and north county residents! Please take action against allowing large commercial air service to operate out of Palomar Airport. North county does not need the noise, pollution or increased air traffic from large planes. Please help maintain the quality of life we have in north county.
Lori Hiers
Escenico Terrace, Carlsbad 92009
From: Marcia Venegas-Garcia
To: Public Comments
Subject: Item D5 — Airport Resolution
Date: Monday, October 21, 2024 9:25:06 PM
Vista City Council Members,
Please support the residents of North County and adopt Item D5 - Airport Resolution.
Marcia Venegas-Garcia
Carlsbad Resident
City of Carlsbad Senior Commissioner
From:
Dawn Guendert
To:
Public Comments
Subject:
Resolution #2024
Date:
Monday, October 21, 2024 3:42:56 PM
As a Carlsbad resident who lives in the vicinity of Carlsbad's Palomar Airport, I urge Vista City Council members to support Resolution #2024, limiting the size of commercial jets at Palomar Airport.
Thank you.
Dawn Guendert
Plum Tree Rd, Carlsbad, CA 92011
ADD TO PACKET
From: Andy Schiffman
To: Public Comments
Subject: Item D-5- Airport Resolution
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 1:57:03 PM
Hello,
I emphatically support restricting commercial airline use of Palomar Airport..
Andy Schiffman
Carlsbad, CA
D5
iThree Senior Living
Qw
MA
cam.4.4
e"n"
Worst Case PAL 2 Extracted pages from
E-PEIR Appendix D 2021 Supplement
NOP-2
II(37.93 :161
O
3F 94 a8) .'
OCEANSIL A/ :` NOP 12 NOP-35
177-1
�063 dB)
O� NOP-32
(37 01 dB)
Future Planning Activity Level
certa6o 2 (PAL 2)
VISTA Ias-4 03-6713 02
)i� 13d8 Iran fl? iR�
J.U. GUUN i Y
NOP 11
(38.59 dB) 14-1
151-1 _ NOP-33
(38 73 dB) I(4055 dB) (43.08 dB)
NOP-3. IIV
I(39.39 d6) 119.1
Ib (3894 dB) NOP-12
;r!a� NOP-35
143 65
.. NOP-16 dBi I
CARLSBA i7618 f5110dB) IdB) NOP-B
OA4 NOP 15 Idy (42.79 dB)
NOP-13 dB) (44 54 dB)'j
/ (41 39 dB) NOP 7
0 NOP-14 143 1 \ (45-86 dB) p
161-14 (4544dB)
(43-25 dB) 4(51 77 dB)
K,14
f51159 d61 ` 54-61 d13Y NOP-,0 157-43 d (53 73 dB)
-� NOP-17 153.40 1
Highest Impacted:
535 Linda Vista Dr #255
58-98 dB Community Noise
E u{valent Level CNEL
185-4 03-6/R-02
(43.13dB ' (43.03 dB) - -
CJl.VIN UlUl1
\ NOP-37.
(43.34 dB)
R-113 166-1
(45.97 dB) (51
01 179- 1 /01 -1
144-1 8 96 dB)
(50.67 dB) 156-1
X(49.02 dB)
V75 1 (5691 dB) dB]
fS2:S5 d81
126-2
NOP-5 (46.71 dB)
NOP�22 (53.78 a-,
(55.26 d5) 172-1
R-16 (39 19
18-31160-1
(52.66 dB)
NOP-21 _
(51.49"dB)
17c1B _
(46.04 dB) NOP-27
(45-04 dB)
NOP=28 NOP-34
(45 39 dB) (43 43 dB)
l (51 69 dB)
NOP-1-8 NOP-9 O dB)
(5476 dBi MOP-23 (41 85 dB) g
(48.26 dB)
NOP-6
(51.38 dB) 169-3
f6i-11180•1- (39.84 dB)
W--(41-08•d61•- NOP-36 NOP-38
47.01 (35.75 dB)
178 -,6
(40.17 da) E N C I N I TA 5 uF
533.]Vit l5.
F
128-1/129-1/147-2 N
I(47.87 dB) SAN MA'RY-iS
r NOP-30
139-11146-1/R•111 (3881 dB)
(d3,61 dB)-";
_ NOP-1
(4242 dBY''
NOP-10
NOP-31 (38-89 dB)
(39.01;dB)
NOP-29
(38.75 dB)
\NOP-224NOP-25 N_OP-26
(37.88 dB) (38.29 dB) (38.46 dB)
CAS
Figure 4
Future Conditions (2036)
With Project (PAL2)
0 Comment Address
65 dB CNEL
® Municipal Boundary
enachas Dr, Lett Noise Sensor at
930 W San Marcos Blvd #33
70' from Highest Impacted
Add 3-4 dB per Rindfleisch TC, Alonso
Q, Jackson DC, Munguia BC, Bowman
,4W. A large-scale validation study of
aircraft noise modeling for airport
arrivals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Mar 1.
155(3):1928-1949. doi:
10.1121110.0025276. PMID: 38466043.
Potential - 63 dB CNEL
N
A
0 0.5 1 2
mi.
1 in, = 1 mi.
When printed at 11 in. by 17 in.
A/ FSS
McClellan -Palomar Airport
Master Plan Update PER
Supplemental Noise Analysis
x.,... , i r.... ,.i., _ .....