ACTION:
____________________________
Clerk/Secretary
Department: Engineering Item No: C11
Prepared by:
Husam Hasenin, Traffic Engineering
Division Manager
Sally Rowley, Management Assistant Meeting Date: May 13, 2025 Approved by:
Greg Mayer, Engineering Director
John Conley, City Manager Agenda Location: Consent Calendar S
UBJECT: SPEED HUMPS ON SPORTS PARK WAY
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the installation of speed humps on Sports Park Way between Cota Lane and Northerly End.
CORRELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS: Traffic: Continue to enhance mobility safety, improve the flow of traffic for all forms of travel, reduce congestion, and improve our roads and sidewalks.
PRIOR ACTION: On June 13, 2023, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2023-96, amending City Council Policy 600-07, Criteria and Procedures for Installation of Speed Humps (Vote: 4-1, Franklin Opposed).
A
comprehensive list of prior City Council actions is included as Exhibit 1.
P
RIOR TRAFFIC COMMISSION ACTION: On April 2, 2025, approved the installation of speed humps on Sports Park Way between Cota Lane and Northerly End. (Vote: 5-0, Mangold and Matheus Absent).
STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT: The City received a request to evaluate the stretch of Sports Park Way between Cota Lane and Northerly End for speed humps as a traffic calming measure. Staff conducted an evaluation of the road section using the criteria outlined in City Council Policy 600-07, Criteria and Procedures for Installation of Speed Humps. Please see Exhibit 2 for the speed hump evaluation. Staff determined that this section of Sports Park Way meets the criteria for the installation of speed humps.
As required in City Council Policy 600-07, the residents of this street segment submitted a petition for the installation of speed humps. Exhibits 3 and 4 are the petition and petition verification map, which show that a majority of nearby residents are in support of speed humps on this segment.
Staff collected data that showed the prevailing speeds between Cota Lane & Northerly End to be around 34 miles per hour. The speed study is attached as Exhibit 5.
The adjacent properties have been notified that this proposal will be on the May 13, 2025 City Council agenda. Exhibits 6 and 7 contain the notice and a map of notified properties.
AGENDA
REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SUCCESSOR AGENCY
BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT
JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
05/13/2025
C11
1 of 16
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2025 PAGE 2
SUBJECT: SPEED HUMPS ON SPORTS PARK WAY
FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost to install two speed humps is $15,000 (the cost per speed hump varies by street width). Funding to install the speed humps is available in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Capital Improvement Budget for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. 8361 Neighborhood Traffic Calming.
E
XHIBITS:
1. List of Prior Actions
2. Speed Hump Evaluation
3. Petition
4. Petition Verification Map
5. Speed Study
6. Property Notification Map
7. Notice
8. Location Map
9. City Council Policy 600-07, Criteria and Procedures for Installation of Speed Humps 05/13/2025
C11
2 of 16
Prior City Council Actions
Speed Humps on Sports Park Way
O
n June 13, 2023, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2023-96, amending City Council Policy 600-07, Criteria and Procedures for Installation of Speed Humps (Vote: 4-1, Franklin Opposed).
O
n March 28, 2023, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2023-44, approving speed humps at certain locations in the City (Vote: 5-0).
O
n December 8, 2009, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2009-197, amending City Council Policy 600-07 (Vote: 5-0).
O
n May 28, 1996, adopted City Council Resolution No. 96-42, establishing guidelines for the installation of speed humps as specified in Chapter 16 of the City of Vista Municipal Code (Vote:
5-0).
05/13/2025
C11
3 of 16
EXHIBIT 1
Fire Department
Fire Department Review and Approval YES NO
Conditions - Minimum of 80 Out of 100 Points Required
1. The street is a local residential or a collector street and is QRWa major or arterial street as defined by the City of Vista's Circulation Element. (25 points*)
YES NO
2. The installation of speed humps will not result in the diversion of traffic to a nearby parallel street (25 points*)
YES NO
3. 6SHHGVWXG\ shows that the measured 85 percentile speed is 35 mph or more; or 60% of motorists exceed 25 mph. (15 points) YES NO
4. Street shall be no more than one lane in each direction. (10 points) YES NO
5. Adequate horizontal or vertical alignments and sight distance. (15 points)
YES NO
6. Street not scheduled for resurfacing within 16 months. (10 points) YES NO
Total Points:
Petition
Petition contains signatures from at least 51% of
adjacent residents shown in the city-provided map. Satisfied Not Satisfied
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF VISTA
SPEED HUMP CRITERIA CHECK LIST
DDate:
SStreet: LLimits:
IInstructions: The following three steps must be met before proceeding to Traffic Commission and City Council approval.
,VWRWDOSRLQWPLQLPXPRI2XWRI3RLQWV5HTXLUHG" NO
<(6
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
16-Dec-2024
Sports Park Way Cota Lane & Northerly End
■
100
APPROVED
QUALIFIES
QUALIFIED ■
05/13/2025
C11
4 of 16
EXHIBIT 2
05/13/2025
C11
5 of 16
EXHIBIT 3
N
/
/
I
I
/
/
CITY OF VISTA
L I
PETITION MAP REQUESTING SPEED HUMPS
Petition Map for Proposed Speed Humps on Sports Park Way between Cota Lane & end must have signatures from 51 % of the 13 properties shown. ,>-�, I ',
1' �,
I
I
/
/
�, ' /-� '✓
' /
' ' '
I I I
\, ______ ; ________
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,-
,......-'\ \
,./ �
/,,., � _._ ____
___
__________ ............
....
,,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ali Sohi - (760)643-5435 - [email protected]
9/13= 69%
Ali Sohi
City Of Vista
05/13/2025
C11
6 of 16
EXHIBIT 4
Day: City: Vista
Date: Project #: CA22_040194_001
Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
1:00 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
2:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 0 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
5:00 1 1 4 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
6:00 1 6 20 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46
7:00 3 4 42 37 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 94
8:00 2 6 37 39 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102
9:00 3 2 16 35 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66
10:00 1 5 18 19 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59
11:00 1 6 19 29 15 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 77
12:00 PM 1 3 13 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56
13:00 1 5 19 25 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70
14:00 2 7 20 54 37 13 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 141
15:00 2 4 30 61 38 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 161
16:00 6 6 32 72 80 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 221
17:00 1 6 57 108 69 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 264
18:00 0 4 43 142 106 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 318
19:00 5 5 26 51 47 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 152
20:00 2 4 11 30 46 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 110
21:00 1 2 7 20 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52
22:00 0 2 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
23:00 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
35 80 425 775 538 151 28 3 2035
2% 4% 21% 38% 26% 7% 1% 0% 100%
14 31 163 186 67 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 477
1% 2% 8% 9% 3% 1% 0% 23%
7:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 8:00 11:00 11:00 8:
00 3 6 42 39 15 5 2 102
21 49 262 589 471 139 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 1558
1% 2% 13% 29% 23% 7% 1% 0% 77%
16:
00 14:00 17:00 18:00 18:00 15:00 14:00 14:00 18:00
6 7 57 142 106 24 6 2 318
AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
196 10% 126 6% 485 24% 1228 60%
Summary
ADT
2035
PercentilesStreet Name
Sports Park Way
85th
34 95th
38 50th
28 Average
28 15th Direction
22 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Sports Park Way S/O Cota Ln
10/25/2022
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
All Speeds
Tuesday
Volume
PM Volumes
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Volume
Directional Peak Periods
05/13/2025
C11
7 of 16
EXHIBIT 5
550
1521 1517
1513
1509
1505
1501
1538
1532
1526
1520
1514
1506
SPORTS PARK WY
AVILA LN
LEONIS PL
MACHADO WY
COTA LN
SPORTS PARK WY
AVILA LN
I
City of Vista
Notification Map
Speed Humps on Sports Park Way between Cota Lane & Northerly End 05/13/2025
C11
8 of 16
EXHIBIT 6
April 29, 2025
OWNER/OCCUPANT
Subject: Speed Humps on Sports Park Way between Cota Lane a nd Northerly End
Dear OWNER/OCCUPANT:
Residents have expressed concern with speeding on Sports Park Way and requested the installation of speed humps between Cota Lane and the Northerly End. The street met the City’s evaluation criteria and the residents submitted a petition in support of their request.
The installation of speed humps requires review by the Traffic Commission and approval by the City Council.
The proposal was approved by the Traffic Commission on April 2, 2025. The proposal will be presented at the City Council meeting on Tuesday, May 13, 2025, at 5:30 pm. This is a public meeting that is open to the public.
The meeting is planned to be held in the City Council Chambers at the Civic Center located at 200 Civic Center Drive. Please check the meeting agenda for further instructions or in case of a change to the meeting format. The meeting agenda will be available on the City’s website, www.vista.gov, by Wednesday, May 7, 2025.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
[âátÅ lA [táxÇ|Ç
Husam Y. Hasenin
Traffic Engineering Divi
sion Manager
760.643.5411
[email protected]
05/13/2025
C11
9 of 16 EXHIBIT 7
COTA LN
AVILA LN
SPORTS PARK WY
MACHADO WY
LEONIS PL
ADOBE ESTATES DR
LOCATION:
SUBJECT:
DATE: May 13, 2025
Speed Humps
Sports Park Way between Cota Lane & Northerly End
I
N SANTA FE AV
NORTH AV
TAYLOR ST
MELROSE DR
ANZA AV
BARSBY ST
OCEANSIDE BLVD
ROSE DR TOWNSITE DR
APOLLO DR
MUSEUM WY RUSH AVSite
05/13/2025
C11
10 of 16
EXHIBIT 8
VistaCity CouncilPolicy
600-07 (1)
600-07 CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FORINSTALLATION
OF SPEEDHUMPS
PURPOSE
To provide uniformity in considering requestsfor speedhumps, the followingstandards, selectioncriteria, proceduresand installation guidelinesare adopted foruse by the City Engineer, Traffic Commissionand City Council.
POLICY
1. Standards and Selection Criteria
a. Speed humps maybe used on those localresidential streetswhose primary functionis to provideaccessto abuttingresidencesor on collectorstreets. Speed humps shallnot be used on major and arterialroadwaysas designatedin the Circulation Elementof the GeneralPlan of the City of Vista. b. Streetsegmentsshallbe without severeverticalor horizontal alignment. A speed hump shallbe visible forat least 200 feet.
c. The measured 85thpercentilespeeds shallbe greaterthan 35 mph or60 percent of the measuredspeedsshall be in excessof the posted speedlimit. d. The street shallnot be animportant access route foremergency vehiclesas determinedby theCity's emergencyservices departments.
e. Speed humps shallnot beinstalledon streetswhenit is anticipatedthat traffic will bedivertedto another localresidentialstreet.
f. The streetmust consistof one travellane in each direction. g. Speed humpswill not normallybe installed on isolatedblocksalonga continuous street or on a relatively short (less than 800 feet) cul-de- sac. h. The streetshallnot be scheduledfor resurfacingduringthe next 16 months.
2. Procedures
a. The City's adopted policies and procedures forthe installationof speed humps will bemade available toall interested parties.
b. A residentof a local residentialstreet, who believesthe residentson thatstreet will support the installation of speed humps will submita requestin writingto the City Traffic Engineer. The Traffic Engineer will consult with the City's emergency 05/13/2025
C11
11 of 16
EXHIBIT 9
VistaCity CouncilPolicy
600-07 (2)
servicesdepartments inmakinga determinationof whetherthe streetin question is eligiblefor furtherconsiderationfor the installationof speed humps, i.e., the street is consistent withthe City's policiesfor the installationof speed humps.
The City Traffic Engineer will completeSpeedHumpCriteria Checklist (ExhibitA) to makethe determinationof satisfying the City's policy. c. Upondeterminationthat a streetis noteligiblefor speedhumps, the residentof the streetwill benotifiedin writing givingthe reasonwhy the streetis noteligible.
The residentof the street willbe given15 days to appealthe decisionin writingto the CityEngineer. If the CityEngineerconcludes the TrafficEngineer's decision is valid, the resident mayappealthe City Engineer's decision tothe Traffic Commission. TheTrafficCommission will thenconsiderthe resident's appealand determineif the City Engineer's decisionshouldbe overruled andallowthe requestto continue. The TrafficCommission's decisionto overrule the City Engineer will identifythe reasonsand special circumstancesto allow further considerationof speed humpson therequestedstreet. If the Traffic Commission rejects the appeal, the mattermay still be appealedto the City Councilprovided that 60 percentof the residentson the street sign the petition (ExhibitB) in supportof speed humps.
d. Upondeterminationthat a streetis eligiblefor furtherconsideration, the resident of the street willbe advisedto submita petition (ExhibitB) from abuttingthe property ownersor residentsindicatingthat a clear majority (51 percentor more) supportthe installationof speed humpson their street. Staff willpreparea map of the properties required to sign the petitionto aid residentsin their signature gatheringeffort. The petitionformsprovidedby the City will state: "If there is subsequently a desire by residents to removethe speed humps, the humps will only be considered for removal after receipt of a petition from a substantial majority (51 percent or more) asking for removal along with a guarantee to provide sufficient funds for removal as determined by the City Engineer." The sponsorof the petitionis requiredto contact every residentof the abutting propertiesof the subject street. If a residentis against the speedhumps, the word "OPPOSED" will be notedon the petition signature space. If the sponsoris unableto contacta resident, "NOCONTACT" will be notedon thepetition signaturespace with datesand timesthat the contactwas attempted. It is requiredthat thesponsor makeat leasttwo attemptson separatedaysto contact a resident.
Any petitionssubmittedprior to the eligibility determinationby City staff will not be processedaheadof scheduleand shallbe subjectto returnif all required informationon theinstallationof speed humpsis not includedthereon. e. Uponverificationof the petition, the TrafficEngineerwill maketrafficspeed and 05/13/2025
C11
12 of 16
VistaCity CouncilPolicy
600-07 (3)
volume measurements, reviewthe traffic accident historyfor the streetin question, and determine acceptablelocations for speed humps. f. Uponcompletionof the study, Citystaff will preparean agendaitem for considerationby the TrafficCommission. City staff willnotifythe propertieson the subject streetof the proposalfor speedhumpson. The TrafficCommission will then holda hearingon therequestand either approve ordisapprovethe request. If the TrafficCommissiondenies the request, theresident mayappeal the decisionto the City Council. The appealto the City Councilmustbe made within30 daysof the TrafficCommission's action.
g. The recommendationof the TrafficCommissionto installspeedhumpswill be forwardedto the City Council forapproval.
h. In the event the numberof requestsfor speed humps exceeds the funds available, theCity Engineer will rankthe requestsin a recommendedorderof priorityand submit theserecommendationsto the TrafficCommissionfor approval. The priority listrecommendedfor approvalwill be basedon traffic accidents, speeds, trafficvolumes, and commentsof the City's emergency servicesdepartments. The CityEngineerwill set forth the basisfor the recommended prioritiesin a reportaccompanyingthe prioritylist.
Unless thereis an overriding consideration suchas high incidenceof speed- related accidents, prioritieswill benormallyestablishedby multiplyingthe percentageof motorists exceeding25 mph by the 24-hour traffic volumeof the street in question. A street yielding thehighest numerical value resultingfrom the aboveconsiderationwill be consideredto have the highestpriorityfor speed humps. Dependingon thenumberof petitions receivedand the typesof streets involved, it is possiblethat a "cut-off speed" (perhapsan 85th percentile speedof 30 mph) will beestablished, belowwhichstreetswill not beconsideredfor the program.
i. The physicalinstallationof speedhumpsand theassociated traffic control devices shall conformto design standardsestablishedby the City Engineer. j. The City reservesthe rightto removeany orall of the speed humpsat any time at no cost to the propertyowner( s).
3. Installation Guidelines
a. Speed humps shallnot beplacedover manholes, watergates, junction chambers, etc.
b. Wherepossible, speedhumpsshouldbe placed at property lines insteadof mid- lot.
05/13/2025
C11
13 of 16
VistaCity CouncilPolicy
600-07 (4)
c. Wherepossible, speedhumps should be placedadjacentto street lights. d. Hump Dimensions: Thedimensionsfor the speedhumpmay vary from3 to 4 inchesin heightand 12to 20 feetin width. The CityEngineer, with theCity's emergency services departments, willexaminethe heightand widthof humpsto determinethe desireddimensionsfor installationof speed humpsin the City. Full height shall extend to twofeet from gutter andtaperto join existingpavementat edge of gutter.
e. Spacing:
1) 200 to 750 feetbetweenhumps.
2) 25 feetto fire hydrantsand manholes.
3) 200 feetto intersections.
f. Warning Signs: "BUMPS AHEAD" signsshallbe placedon either endof the streetsegment where speedhumpsare beinginstalled.
g. Markings: "BUMP" pavement markingshall be placedin advanceof each hump in both directions.
h. Notifications: Eachresidenton the streetshallbe notifiedin writingof the planned humpinstallationat least threeweeksprior to construction. i. The City Engineerwill develop standardsfor speed humpinstallationand markings.
HISTORY
Adopted May28, 1996, Resolution No. 96-42
AmendedDecember8, 2009, ResolutionNo. 2009-197
AmendedJune13, 2023, ResolutionNo. 2023-96
05/13/2025
C11
14 of 16
Fire Department
Fire Department Review and Approval YES NO
Conditions - Minimum of 80 Out of 100 Points Required
1. The street is a local residential or a collector street and is not a major or arterial street as defined by the City of Vista's Circulation Element. (25 points*)
YES NO
2. The installation of speed humps will not result in the diversion of traffic to a nearby parallel street (25 points*)
YES NO
3. Speed study shows that themeasured 85th percentile speed is 35 mph or more; or 60% of motorists exceed 25 mph. (15 points) YES NO
4. Street shall be no more than one lane in each direction. (10 points) YES NO
5. Adequate horizontal or vertical alignments and sight distance. (15 points)
YES NO
6. Street not scheduled for resurfacing within 16 months. (10 points) YES NO Total Points:
Petition
Petition contains signatures fromat least 51% of adjacent residents shownin the city-providedmap. Satisfied Not Satisfied
Summery:
EXHIBITA
CITY OF VISTA
SPEED HUMP CRITERIA CHECK LIST
Date:
Street: Limits:
Instructions: The following three steps must be met before proceeding to Traffic Commission and City Council approval.
05/13/2025
C11
15 of 16
VistaCity CouncilPolicy
600-07 (6)
EXHIBITB
PETITION REQUESTINGINSTALLATIONOF SPEEDHUMPS
We, theundersigned residentsof Street, from
Streetto Street,
Do hereby requestthe Cityof Vista, California, to install speedhumpson ourstreet. We agreethatif in the futurethat if we desireto removethe speed hump, the humpswill only be considered for removal after receipt ofa petitionfroma substantial majority (51% or more) asking forthe removal along witha guaranteeto provide sufficientfundsfor removalas determinedby the City Engineer. The City reserves the right to remove anyor all of the humpsat any time at no cost tothe propertyowners.
Neighborhood Representative:
Date
Signature
Headof Household) Address
Position
a)
Daytime
Phone
a) Support - S Opposed -0 No Contact - NC
05/13/2025
C11
16 of 16