cc 2025 AR 06/24 final map 1205 melrose way — Vista City Council, June 24, 2025

ACTION:

____________________________
Clerk/Secretary

Department: Engineering Item No: C3
Prepared by:

Fred Tafaghodi, Senior Engineer
Sally Rowley, Management Assistant Meeting Date: June 24, 2025 Approved by:

Greg Mayer, Director
John Conley, City Manager Agenda Location: Consent Calendar

SUBJECT: FINAL MAP – 1205 MELROSE WAY SUBDIVISION (P21-0130)

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt City Council Resolution No. 2025- , approving a Final Map for 15-lot Single- Family Residential Subdivision located at 1205 Melrose Way (APNs: 166 -184-10-00, 166-184-09-00, and 166-183-17-00).

CORRELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS: Homelessness & Housing.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION: On August 23, 2022, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2022- 130, approving a General Plan Amendment and Tentative Subdivision Map including a Density Bonus for a 15-lot Single-Family Residential Subdivision located at 1205 Melrose Way (APNs 166-184-10- 00, 166-184-09-00, and 166-183-17-00) (Vote 4-1, Melendez Opposed)

On August 23, 2022, adopted City Council Resolution No. 2022-129, approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Prepared for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map Including a Density Bonus For a 15- Lot Single-Family Residential Subdivision Located at 1205 Melrose Way (APNs 166-184-10-00, 166-184- 09-00, and 166-183-17-00) (Vote 4-1, Melendez Opposed)

PRIOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: On July 19, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-14, recommending City Council denial of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map including a Density Bonus for a 15-lot Single-Family Residential Subdivision located at 1205 Melrose Way (APNs 166-184-10-00, 166-184- 09-00, and 166-183-17-00) (Vote 6-0-1, Aguilera Absent)

STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT: The project site consists of a 2.55-acre site at the address 1205 Melrose Way, which is located on the north side of Melrose Way, northwest of Centennial Drive (APNs 166-184-10- 00, 166-184-09-00, and 166-183-17-00) as shown in Exhibit 1A. A vicinity map is included as Exhibit 2. The tentative subdivision map, P21-0130, was approved by the City of Vista City Council on August 23, 2022 (Exhibit 3).

The California Subdivision Map Act requires the filing of a final map for any approved tentative map. Approval of a final map is ministerial if the final map conforms to the approved tentative map and the developer has complied with all conditions of approval attached to the tentative map. The approved Tentative Subdivision Map provides for 15 single-family dwelling units on 2.55 acres of land. The proposed project is consistent

AGENDA
REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
06/24/2025
C3
1 of 31
MEETING DATE: June 24, 2025 PAGE 2

SUBJECT: FINAL MAP – 1205 MELROSE WAY SUBDIVISION (P21-0130) with the General Plan and zoning designations for the site; and the site would be adequately served by all necessary utilities and services.

Both the state Subdivision Map Act and Chapter 17.68 of the Vista Development Code address approval of Final Maps. Section 66458 of the Subdivision Map Act states:

“The legislative body shall, at the meeting at which it received the map or, at its next regularly scheduled meeting after the meeting at which it received the map, approve the map if it conforms to all the requirements of the chapter and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative subdivision map and any rulings made there under.

If the map does not conform, the legislative body shall disapprove the map.”

Section 17.68.020 of the Vista Development Code, which addresses City Council approval of Final Maps, states:

“No final map shall be filed in the office of the county recorder until approved by the city council, but such map shall be disapproved only for failure to meet or perform requirements or conditions which were applicable to the subdivision at the time of approval of the tentative map, providing that any such disapproval shall be accompanied by a finding identifying the requirements or conditions which have not been met or performed.”

In additions, Section 17.68.090 of the Vista Development Code requires the Final Map to include a certificate from the City Engineer stating:

1. The City Engineer has examined the final map;

2. The subdivision as shown is substantially the same as it appeared on the tentative map, and any approved alterations thereto, and that it conforms to all conditions of approval of the tentative map;

3. All provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and of any local ordinance applicable at the time of approval of the tentative map have been complied with; and

4. The City Engineer is satisfied that the map is technically correct.

As set forth in Exhibit 1B, the City Engineer has examined and found that this Final Map as shown is substantially the same as it appeared on the approved Tentative Subdivision Map, conforms to the conditions of approval, and complies with all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances. A licensed land surveyor has also reviewed the Final Map and is satisfied that it is technically correct. This statement and signature with the stamp are shown on the Final Map in accordance with the Subdivis ion Map Act requirements. Based on this certification, staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Map.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the staff recommendation.

EXHIBITS:

1. City Council Resolution No. 2025- , approving a Final Map for a 15-lot single family residential subdivision located at 1205 Melrose Way (APNs: 166-184-10-00, 166-184-09-00, and 166-183-17-00) a. Final Map
b. City Engineer Certification

2. Vicinity Map

3. Tentative Subdivision Map

4. Vista Development Code, Chapter 17.68, entitled “Final Maps”

5. City of Vista – California Levine Act Disclosure (Owner)

6. City of Vista – California Levine Act Disclosure (Contractor)

06/24/2025
C3
2 of 31
00029213 7
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CHARTERED CITY OF VISTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A FINAL MAP FOR A 15-LOT SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 1205 MELROSE WAY (APNS: 166-184-10-00, 166-184-09-00, AND 166-183-17-00) The City Council of the City of Vista does resolve as follows:

1. Findings. The City Council hereby finds and declares the following:

A. A Tentative Subdivision Map for a 15-lot single-family residential subdivision located at 1205 Melrose Way (APNs: 166-184-10-00, 166-184-09-00, and 166-183-17-00) was approved by the City of Vista City Council on August 23, 2022 B. A complete application for a Final Map was filed with the City Engineer prior to the expiration date for the Tentative Subdivision Map set by Section 66452.6 of the Government Code.

C. The City Engineer has examined the proposed Final Map, attached as Exhibit A, and determined that the map complies with the requirements for Section 66442 of the Government Code as evidenced by the executed certificate of the City Engineer attached as Exhibit B.

D. The City Engineer has determined that all other provisions to the approval of the Final Map have been satisfied, including without limitation, the dedication of all required land interest, the posting of all required bonds, the execution of all required improvement agreements, compliance with all preconditions set by the Tentative Map, compliance with Chapter 17.68 of the Vista Development Code; and the satisfaction of all other obligations imposed on the applicant in advance of approval of the Final Map.

2. Action.

A. The Final Map is approved.

B. The City Clerk is directed to cause the Final Map to be filed and recorded in the office of records of the County of San Diego Recorder.
[Continued on page 2]
06/24/2025
C3
3 of 31
EXHIBIT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CHARTERED CITY OF VISTA
PAGE 2
00029213 7EXH 01 2025 Resolution template -COV (00029213-8xBECB1).docx

3. Adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Vista held on June 24, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

WALTER CHUNG, CITY ATTORNEY
By:

APPROVED
Walter C. Chung
20250610114905
JOHN B. FRANKLIN, MAYOR
ATTEST:

KATHY VALDEZ, CITY CLERK
By:
06/24/2025
C3
4 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
5 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
6 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
7 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
8 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
9 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
10 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
11 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
12 of 31
Vicinity Map - 1205 Melrose Way Subdivision
May 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. ±
1 inch = 100 feet
LD23-048
Print Date: 0 60 12030
ft
1205 MELROSE WAY

SUBDIVISION
06/24/2025
C3
13 of 31
EXHIBIT 2
P21 mO130LEGEND 15 - LOTTENIVESUBDIVISIONMAPFORPROJECT
FILE NUMBER:

ITEM SYMBOL OWNER/ SUBDIVIDE R
SHEET 1 OF 6

PROJECT
BOUNDARY1205 M ELROSE WAY

WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE RECORD OWNERS OF THE

LOT LINE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND THAT

EASEMENT LINE SAID MAP SHOWS OUR ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP( EXCLUDING 4 m 1' SUBDIVISION LOTS). WE UNDERSTAND THAT PROPERTY IS CONSIDERED

SETBACK LINE I
m. B, I Ir\ II I CONTIGUOUS EVEN IF IT IS SEPARATED BY ROADS, STREETS, UTILITY PORsuu / a w
i
EASEMENTS OR RAILROADS RIGHTS- OF- WAY.t 25 11si rctL--'-- --- r------ 1 f --- I Iiii j i \ BUILDING LINE I I R4W BM / ' i' i / (
I rl II, II __ I

OWNER/ SUBDIVIDER
I I
I `
aY III,, -- 7 ;

CENTERLINE I
i- i I'

I --- - --,
V- r- --^ 7-r- - i' --- __
g- - ----

EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
OE EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE m1' I I `_'
MAP 12195 ENTINCI I' i ; I I 1. I iq \ - - 111i--- 1 A
II' I 111__I
LOT$

PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS, I

EXISTING WATERLINE
W
I m
I
III) I\I LOT7 I CONTACT: ZORAN DJORDJEVICH
S I;'

I I - -
I I;;I;; I I MAP 1219S I 551 LYNWOOD DRIVE
w III I I i -. --- -
I
EXISTING SEWER MAIN ENCINITAS, CA 92024

EXISTING GAS LINE
G
I
4, I l
J
I I j
B
r l
i
PC(
7RSWi 1/ 4 iB I ga---
1-\
BNF
P 7U12
I ' I.

ENGINEER OF WORK

EXISTING STORM DRAIN
I x i S sfi11s ".° I
111 I
HB. - - ----- -- -
t-=-,
la
R4WSBM I r L------------
I I
I
I
9 liin
1\` _ i i l 1 ---
i
III
r - ` \` G B o' at____-
EJ
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 13,.
q„
I V

EXISTING FENCE X
I
I I +__/
B I I I I 1 Q 7-____=_=======\-
T-
rt i

I IL--------- '
I
I
o 0
3so-
4_-_
i-------;-- - --- -- -
w

DAYLIGHT LINE
I-
I. No. RCE 68964
C
J
5 g y - ------- \ `
1 y` E .

C. 1 -
3 P
B
I EXP. 12 31 2
CUT/ FILL LINE P*ee, J
FINISHED GROUND CONTOUR 440
OF CAS\FWILLIAM J. SUI ER RCE 68964
EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR 440 RZG/ ° ,%/
l\
s
1im
11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED CUTIFILL SLOPE 2: 1
Q
I/
w
B
RETAINING WALL( PER SEPARATE PERMIT) IB PORTION OF LOT 15 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CA.

EXISTING SPOT ELEV. 400. 50 FG) I 1 PCL "" j % : i I \ 1 I \`
L MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN DEEDS DD1: F/ P 2014- 0543887, O. R. REC. 12/ 10/ 2014; DD2: F/ P 400. 50
I I PM6 7 1 I ' I iCa25T _
2014- 0543888, O. R. REC. 12- 10- 2014; DD3: F/ P 2014- 0543889, O. R. REC. 12/ 10/ 2014)

FUTURE SPOT ELEVATIONS FIG
PROPOSED 6" CURB& GUTTER j
Xxf I

GENERAL NOTES
PROPOSED 6" ROLLED CURB& GUTTER
i j f'` L
I -=,-_=---
1 - I I _
I
J : \ r _ _ - y

1. APN: 166- 184- 10- 00, 166- 183- 17- 00, 166- 184- 09- 00

2. GROSS ACREAGE: 2. 55 AC/ 111, 078 SF
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SDI j

3. NET ACREAGE: 2. 21 AC / 92, 267 SF
B
I B It _ - Pf \ 4. NUMBER OF LOTS: 16PROPOSED CURB INLET a I I
I
I I i ` I
B

5. NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 15j'-
T

6. EXISTING ZONING: E- 1 ESTATE RESIDENTIALIPROPOSED STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT L __
I \`%_
7 1I
I PROPOSED ZONING: R- 1
PROPOSED BROOKS BOX I EXISTING GENERAL PLAN: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL( LD) 2 DU/ AC PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MLD - 5 DU/ AC1__ f-' I 3•
y '
z , .
o
IJ t

PROPOSED HEADWALL
r I 8. FINISH GRADES SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN i
4 1 1 „
1; ._ `,
I I 6 III \ ; I I FINAL DESIGN.

I I 1 ,
1 I B I 9. PROPOSED DENSITY: 5 DU/ AC
I I

10. CUT AND FILL SLOPES NO STEEPER THAN 2: 1

PROPOSED RIP RAP
I
I a I GIs L
PROPOSED SEWER MAIN I i
fl IS
I IB 1 I I 1 I B ! 1 I 11. PUBLIC SERVICES AND DISTRICTS:

I
i I
Vim__=_- 1- 1 1 I `I GAS& ELECTRIC: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC

PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE O
Po
I I 111 I I 9, i N------. ,-
1 I I ,
h
I -. B
I
TELEPHONE: AT& T
R,
P B PCLCr - I \\ PCL D 1 ys L _ -'- I
I
PM 7 PM 6691 I \ PM 6697/
B
I
BORL7 16 ' I WATER: VISTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT

PROPOSED WATER MAIN W I
I I , ,, I - I I y
I s
4W
s1- SEWER: CITY OF VISTA
I r
am \ %;
B Ei I
i I I I l
SBM
i I FIRE DISTRICT: CITY OF VISTA

PROPOSED CURB RAMP
m
i
I
3--'---'- Qr-
il ' ;
IIII
SCHOOL DISTRICT: VISTA U NIFI ED SCHOOL DISTRICT

12. NO SPECIAL DISTRICTS ARE PROPOSED
O! f
Uj

13. REQUIRED SETBACK PER R- 1 ZONE:

Q i_ r FRONT YARD MINIMUM 20'
B
wAERIALTOPOGRAPHY SIDE YARD= MINIMUM 10
REAR YARD= MINIMUM 10' FOR 1 STORY OR
AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY SUPPLIED BY: PHOTO GEODETIC I 3n° , I l I/ I I I 20 FOR 2 STORY
1161 EAST MAIN ST, SUITE 102 PROPOSED SETBACK PER DENSITY BONUS WAIVERS:

EL CAJON, CA
92021Ij'_
y
TI=-
a -
f1-' i I-, FRONT YARD= MINIMUM 20
619- 631- 1366 r; B :_- I I I , 11 B, B I (
I Sr 11 I I
I I
µJ I

A - / I
SIDE YARD= MINIMUM 5
FLOWN 04/ 14/ 2020 B`` I ` f - \ I 1I i I REAR YARD= MINIMUM 10'I_--- -_ m 4 I 1- r II 1 I rn y I T I I r -
r--- II I I-- _____=-= r I I
O

14. SEE STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN PREPARED BY:1 11 1 I1 ne
I
B
JfS__
Jj_
1 1 i ' I \; - p (-
PASCO LARET SUITER& ASSOCIATES DATED: MARCH 2021

ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER
w_ r _ _ _ ^
m" _
B
Q- ' __ --\ TIC- II 15. SEE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY PREPARED BY:

PASCO LARET SUITER& ASSOCIATES DATED MARCH 2O21Ts_
s my

16. SEE PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PREPARED BY: GEOSOILS, INC 166- 184- 10- 00, 166- 183- 17- 00, 166- 184- 09- 00
t DATED: MARCH 5, 2021 W. O. 8058- A- SC
TAX RATE AREA: 012004
11i
mB 17. BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: NO BUILDINGS PROPOSED AT THIS TIME.ms MELRO WAY 18. LANDSCAPE: TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA 0. 27 AC 111, 761 SF( 12%)I /----- w
w_ w
w. w_ w_ w_ w_ w_
I _---_ 19. PARKING/ PAVEMENT: TOTAL ON- SITE PAVING AREA 0.50 AC/ 21, 705 SF( 23%) i i \ %' __,
of-- a

20. PARKING:

I
GARAGE: 30EARTHWORK QUANTITIES 0 60 120 180
tu4I -' i GUEST: 30
CUT: 2, 602 C.Y. NOTE: QUANTITIES DO NOT INCLUDE ANY EARTHWORK FOR r TOTAL: 60 REMEDIAL PURPOSES. EARTHWORK ESTIMATES ARE BASED ON INFILL: 6, 636 C. Y. SCALE. 1 - 60 IMPORT: 4, 034 C. Y. PLACE VOLUMES AND DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR ANY SKRINKAGE OR SWELL OF THE SOIL THAT MAY OCCUR DURING GRADING.

LOT MATRIX
F°

I '/

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
m

ZONE CHANGE, GENERAL PLAN ADMENDMENT, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION I
x
LOT INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION a I
MAP, AND DENSITY BONUS FOR 1 VERY LOW- INCOME UNIT
w,-
1 I

I I SETBACK LINE DENSITY BONUS CALCULATION
LOT NO. LOT AREA( S. F.) LOT NO. LOT AREA( S. F.) I / TYPICAL) I / I I I r. 2. 55 GROSS ACRES
PIVATE
w
I , I - I w I I I
1 5, 411 STREET
20, 400 1 w ' 1 I I 2. 55 AC* 5 DU/ AC= 12. 75 DU' S 2 5, 605 PRIVATE
12, 868
I
I I \\
I /
w
I%
I
5' S B I
I
5' SYSB 12. 75 DU' S* 0. 20 BONUS= 2. 55 ROUNDED UP TO 3 DENSITY BONUS UNITS

DRIVEWAY I
L_ I
I I ,u I I
3 5, 607 BUILDING LINE TOTAL DU' S( 12+ 3)= 15
4 5, 609 I Di =

TYPICAL)
N
I
x
I
IIr- 7 I
I _
7'
1 F_

AFFORDABLE CALCULATION
5 5, 611 F V mE1 2. 55 AC 5 DU/ AC= 12. 75 DU' S
6 5, 613
I I I I \\ I
I
I I
I 1\ G 1 12. 75 DU' S 0. 05 AFFORDABLE 0. 63( ROUNDED UP TO 1 VERY LOW INCOME) 8 5, 618 I I I / Z (
I
1 I x
7 5, 616
TOTAL UNIT COUNT 15 ( 1 VERY LOW INCOME)
9 5, 360 LUCn
m m 0
10 3, 585
x
w
I }
w
QF w
I DRIVE*AY 0 .
11 3, 756 S S S S 1
0)". H/(t ROAD
12 3, 895
W-
w1-.I-=m
W- W- W- W W- W- W wx` w w w- w! w w-
ivm13 3, 656
TI
l_1V
i -
MELROSEWqy PASCO LARET SUITER
TAT
14 4, 082 ST S

PRIVATE STREET A

S - S - S - S S S - S - S S - S -

PROJECT SITE
15 4, 702 p

Q ASSOUATES

TYPICAL LOT
C /

N I T Y
M San Diego I Solana Beach I OrangeCounty
A 7, 599
SCALE: 1" - 30' Phone858.259.8212 IWWW.plsaengineering.com SAVE DATE:----- PLOT DATE:----- FILENAME:J:1ActiveJobs\3334 MELROSEWAY\CIVIL\DRAWING\DISCRETIONARYPLANS\TENTATIVEMAP\3334-TM-TBLOCK.dwg 06/24/2025
C3
14 of 31
EXHIBIT 3
15 - LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
PROJECT FILE NUMBER:

P21 mO130
SHEET 2 OF 6
1205 MELROSE WAY

PROJECT
R 35' PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT& P. U. E.

BOUNDARY
PROP. 5' WIDE SIDEWALK TRACT TRACT
PER SDRSD G- 7 OVER 6" C/ L BOUNDARY BOUNDARY
CLASS 2 BASE 5. 5' 12' 1 12' 5. 5'

FREEBOARDI
TG PER PLANLOT 15 PROJECT LOT 7 MAP 12195 LOT A Q
2 SEE TABLE HEREONiLlq
sC
I
J I J
I
ii i- i i i-
2 SITE
BASIN
o
q+
O
I LOT 7 MAP 12195 3636 BROOKS BOX 3" PVC SCREW CAP 6" WSE pF CIO 2: 1
MAX2%MIN
9+
s I
1I I- F I
III= III= III= I -

ABOVE GRADE
CAREX PANSA PLANTING, 2/° 2°°-
TO BE CUT FLUSH III= I - III- III-_
OR APPROVED OTHER, wSTORM DRAIN PIPE F 6" WEIR 0 z
Q EX. CONCRETE DITCH
TO BE CUT FLUSH III= III= ?- PER LANDSCAPE PLANS o
SRO I I FIG PER PLAN 2. 5' INLET 12" WEIR p w w
EX. CONCRETE DITCH I
I= -

WEIR NOTCH
PONDINGElI
a
PROP. 6" CURB& EX. GROUND BROOKS BOX EXTEND AND WRAP LINER 12" MIN. III= III-

I I I III III III III I I I I I I I
a
PROP. 6" CURB& PROP. AC PAVEMENT SECTION GUTTER PER CONCRETE COLLAR PAST EDGE OF BERM III= III= III= III= III= III= III III= III= III III- III- III I- I\//\\/ ENGINEERED FILL LAYER SHALL BE FINISH TO MATCH EX GROUNDGUTTER PER SDRSD MINIMUM 4" AC OVER 8" CLASS 2 SDRSD G- 7 TYPE G III- III- III- III- III- III- I= III- III- III- III- III- III MINIMUM 18" DEEP" SANDY LOAM" SOIL SLOPE FALL 1 III- I I- I I- I I- I I- I I III- III- III- III- III I I- III MIX WITH NO MORE THAN 5% CLAYG- 7 TYPE G BASE ( PER SOILS ENGINEER III- I I- I I- I I- I- I I- a I- III- III- I- III- III- I I I - /\

RECOMMENDATION) I

STORM DRAIN PIPE
BACKFILL IN BASIN, AND TO 5' OUTSIDE I- II III- III- I IIII- I I II III- III- III 11I- I I- III II- CONTENT. PERCOLATION RATE
GROUTED RIP RAP III\ PROP. CONCRETE PAD SHALL CONSIST OF A 2- SACK MIX OF I= I= I= I= I= I= I= I= = I= I= 5 101N/HR MINIMUM.

TYPICAL SECTION - PRIVATE STREET A
SLURRY
I I
III 3" NON PERFORATED

STANDPIPE
SCALE: NTS BOTTOM AND OF FLOW
C

THROUGH

THATS COVERED BY A

PLANTER E I I
FEW
PERMAVOID LAYERLINE WITH 30 MIL PV ME BRANDRAIN PIPE TO DAYLIGHT FINISH GRADE DETAIL

MINIMUM OF
0 MIL
ES OF CLEAN SOIL, FREE FROM ROCKS III=_
e/ eO/ o/ ee
I II- II I- I G WATER TIGHT CAP ONSCALE: NTS AND DEBRIS, WITH A MAXIUM 3: 1WITH A MAXIMUM 3: 1 I IiI I g QO TERMINAL END OF PIPE
HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL[ H: V]) SLOPE INCLINATION, OR F / \\\/\\ ,\/\ 3 MI V PR. EX. EX.

FLATTER, AND MEETS THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM f FLOW CONTROL ORIFICE 6" DIAMETER PERFORATION PVC

R/ W R/ W R/ W
SPECIFICATIONS: PLATE PER DETAIL SUBDRAIN SHALL BE ENCAPSULATED IN 9'G GRAVEL. GRAVEL AND SUBDRAIN SHALL
60') SPECIFIC GRAVITY( ASTM D792): 1. 2( G/ CC, MIN.); TENSILE OUTFALL PIPE BE WRAPPED IN MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL.

ASTM D882): 73 ( LB/ IN- WIDTH, MIN); ELONGATION AT BREAK CONNECTION TO CATCH BASIN WITH 55) PROJECT ASTM D882): 380 (%, MIN); MODULUS( ASTM D882): 30 MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL DRILLED ORFICE PLATE

PROJECT BOUNDARY
35 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY& P. U. E. LB/ IN- WIDTH, MIN.); AND TEAR STRENGTH ( ASTM D1004): 8 NON- WOVEN GEOTEXTILE) SITE
C/ L I
LB/ IN, MIN); SEAM SHEAR STRENGTH ( ASTM D882) 58. 4( LB/ IN, NOTE: BACKFILL FOR STORM DRAIN PIPES ENTERING OR EXISTING

5.01 5. 0 20' 25) 5')
1 R
I MIN); SEAM PEEL STRENGTH ( ASTM D882) 15 ( LB/ IN, MIN). MIN 6" BASIN SHOULD BE BACKFILLED WITH A 2- SACK MIX OF SLURRY

2. 75' 12' 12' 5. 5' 2.75' I
PROVIDE 18- INCH OVERLAPPED, TAPED OR

2. 4. 5' VARIES VARIES) 3" 1
9 w
2 ORFICE PLATE MIN. SQUARE DIMENSIONS 1. 0 FT
Is PKWY
z w
2 w w PAD GLUED SEAMS AT ALL SEAMS. PLACE o O
OpF m o CROWNLINE EX. GROUND lq
sC 1 I J I OQ NON- WOVEN FILTER FABRIC( MIRAFI 140N OR INFLOW PIPE GREATER THAN PIPE DIA. HOT- DIP GALVANIZED
w Op m m I S PLATE AFTER HOLES HAVE BEEN DRILLED
2% o Q VARIES F 1 w
PROP. 6" CURB tSP EQUAL) ON EITHER SIDE OF PVC LINER TO PROTECT LINER 1 w o 2/0 VARIES
FROM PUNCTURE ON ALL SIDES, " SANDWHICHING" THE PVC 1
Q
r
I
v
PER SDRSD G- 1 I cal LINER WITH A FABRIC CUSHION. BIOFILTRATION BASIN TABLE SRO EX. GROUND 22%
a a

SIZE OF DRILLED ORFICE
PROP. 5. 0' WIDE PER TABLE HEREON 1/ 2 MAX
BASIN NO. ENGINEERED PERMAVOID TOTAL FREE ORIFICE
SIDEWALK PER PROP. 5' WIDE SIDEWALK SOIL LAYER LAYER PONDING BOARD SDRSD G- 7 OVER EX. CURB& GUTTER PR. BROW DITCH PER SDRSD G- 7 OVER 6" 3/ 8" DIA. HOLE TYPE B PER PROP. 4" AC/ 8" CLASS II CLASS 2 BASE 1 181, 38. 4" 12" 1. 0' 1. 5" MINIMUMM 4" AC OVER 8" CLASS AC PAVEMENT TO A MIN.
6" CLASS 2 BASE PROP. PAVEMENT SECTION GRIND AND OVERLAY EX. EX. AC PAVEMENT SECTION SDRSD D- 75 PAVEMENT SECTION ( PER FLOW CONTROL ORFICE PLATE PROP. 6" CURB& 2 BASE ( PER SOILS ENGINEER DEPTH OF 2- INCHES SOILS ENGINEER PROP. 6" CURB&

GUTTER PER RECOMMENDATION) RECOMMENDATION) GUTTER PER SDRSD SDRSD G-7 TYPE G

TYPICAL SECTION - MELROSE WAY
G2

TYPICAL SECTION - PRIVATE STREET B (

TYPE G)

BIOFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL
SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS
SCALE: NTS

MELROSE
WAY
EX. PROP. TRACT

C/ L R/ W R/ W BOUNDARY
I I
1 I I
1 I 1 I I I 35. 00' P. U. E. I

25. 00'M M r5. 00 I I I I 513. 68'
I I I I I I I I I LOT 7
371. 63 FS

9. 50' 27. 01'
T

42. 00' I 42. 00' I 42. 00' 42. 00' 42. 00' I_ 42. 00' 42. 00' I 42. 00' I 42. 00' I 42. 50' 24. 00' 32. 65' MAP 12195
o 10. 00,
LOT 1 LOT 2 I I I j I I I
I I
Lj_ co I I
1 SD ESMT
1 cliPAD= 367.50 I LOT 3 I LOT 4 I I I I I I I I PRIV. I

NT SECTION
1 PAD= 367. 00 I LOT 5 LOT 6 1
Cl)
PAD= 366. 50
PAD= 366. 00
I I LOT 7 I I I STREET B I
I LOT 8PAD= 365. 70 I I I I I 1
PROP. CONC. SIDEWALK
R„
PAD= 365. 50
PAD= 365. 00 I LOT 9 I U_ 0 J 1
PAD= 364. 50 LOT 10 I LOT 11 1 I I
I N N cocl OC!M I LOT A
PROP. CONC. CURB & GUTTER co co co co
PAD= 363. 50 ro CD N
PAD= 363. 00 PAD= 363. 00 m m I I 1
363. 00 TW
PAD= 362. 50 362. 50 FIG
i 359. 93 FIG
PROP. CO NC. CURB PROP.

PROP. WATER- Q STORM
PROP. AC PAVEMENT SECTION DRAIN PROP. PRIVATE STORM Df

SECTION A- A
PROP. CONIC.

PROP SEWER PROP. RETAINING WALL
SCALE: NTS
TRACT TRACT 20' EXISTING EASEMENT FOR ROAD,

BOUNDARY

PRIVATE

BOUNDARY Q
168. 72' STREET A o I

SEWER, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES PURPOSES
I
PCLA 6. 86' 106. 87' 20. 00' 35. 00' P. U. E. POR LOT16 PROP. HOUSE
i <10 I PROP. 20' EMERGENCYVEHICLEACCESSROAD
PM 6697 1 1 SEC 25 T115 0. 29' POR SW 1/4 POR SW 1/4 LOT 7 1 8' SD ESMT SEC 25 T11 S I I SEC 25 T11 S
EX. FENCE
I i U_ R4W SBM LOT 15 I 1
R4W SBM I I R4W SBM365. 00 FIG 365. 00 FIG
o
v v
APN 166- 183- 20 I I APN 166 183 181 PAD= 365. 00
1 0 0 0 0 1 363. 51 TW
CD
PAD= 364. 5 1 POR LOT16
2: 1 SLOPE362. 82 FIG
M M
362. 82 FIG 0% 2. 0%
1 363. 01 FIG
I SECT 25 T1 15 2% MAX
APROP.

CONIC.

PROP. CONC. SIDEWALK.

BROW DITCH 361. 27 FG
EX. GROUND
1 R4W SBM
1 EX. GROUND
PROP. CONC. CURB & GUTTER
I
PROP. SPLIT FACE PROP. 3" THICK OF 3/ 4"
PROP. AC PAVEMENT SECTION NON- PLANTABLE CMU GRAVEL OVER 4" CLASS II PROP. WATER -

RETAINING WALL PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY
PROP. RETAINING WALL H=4. 9' MAX OF VISTA STD. SWR. 23 TYPE A p
EX. GROUND

TYPICAL SECTION - EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ROAD
PROP. SEWER
SECTION B- B, SCALE: NTS
SCALE: NTS
PROP. 18" PVC

STORM DRAIN PASCO LARET SUITER
SECTION C- C San Diego I Solana Beach I OrangeCounty
SCALE: NTS
Phone858.259.82121 www.pisaengineedng.com
SAVE DATE:----- PLOT DATE:----- FILENAME:hActive Jobs\3334 MELROSEWAY\CIVIL\DRAWING\DISCRETIONARYPLANS\TENTATIVEMAP\3334-TM-TBLOCK.dwg 06/24/2025
C3
15 of 31

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN FOR
PROJECT FILE NUMBER:

P21 mO130
SHEET 3 OF 6
i JiooSr
1 .

C-ON3_
47356
LV - I II11 i 120 , 5 MELROSE WAY
347- 4CONC
I
I ,
BRUSH 1I
Q
C I
I

DESIGN REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED JUSTIFICATION
CP
01,

CONCENSSION/
6VSi ; `
Q
zQ
I
MU§

I D I I H
Z.

INCENTIVE/ WAIVER
J77" 5 r------ T1 P OJE/ CT
zraa- , ii
i _ I
B/O J4DA Y 6;
I l r- -- t-- 1- ie{ ce 5 5 TW
Co" c I IAPN: 166 83 18/ II /
v' `' = o II 394 5 1L I WAIVER# 1: 18. 28. 040 MINIMUM 5 FOOT WIDTH SIDE YARDS THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD PRECLUDE E OB r ( 1 / lil , 4 _ T-
NC SIDE YARD SETBACK R- 1 ZONE: EACH SIDE YARD SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 10 FEET IN CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT AS DESIGNED. THE SITE PLAN3705 I^ NT i sPV SD
I'
IiliSEA I I I TREES LOTS 1- 15 WIDTH MAKES EFFICIENT USE OF THE SITE WHICH RESULTS IN LIMITED POP. RIB ONGU/tTER ' -
9"-"- ----
1 '' $ 46fl t - PHYSICAL AREA TO MEET THE SETBACK STANDARD WITHOUT

9. 56 FS / 0OIFYBV f II T. E - ---
15 Z_ I I II MAKING BACKYARDS UNFEASIBLY SMALL. THEREFORE, THE EXISTING IIIDETAILIO I lEXISTING ACCESS DRIVE 68.48Fs)
o 0 6 . FL I
F-
I
I 364. 5 PAD _ m
I i 1,0' RYS
D CK
1 I r____
E-
LOT 8 SETBACK DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD NEED TO BE REDUCED

IN ORDER FOR THE PROJECT TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE DENSITY I 10% '
1 4, 702 SF I
I
ICI I€ X. CONCRE1jL_ I
MAP 12195
I/ 1364. 21TC o
1 I IQITCH
ALLOWEDT HROUGH THE STATE DENSITY BONUS LAWS.
3705EEI%tNCY/ EH1CLEI36 6 • 677
I \ i 57. 77F I
A CESS/ONk i 1363. 2 F' I
J~ . III I
LOT 7
It I I I , EII=o 1 1
i I 3665 I
l
3636 b i _ m III
I MAP 12195
14 1110CEEAET/ ININGWALL I WAIVER# 2: 18. 28. 050 MINIMUM 10 FOOT REAR YARD THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD PRECLUDE 37L6 I l I 1 ' T i I "' - I '
C REAR YARD SETBACK R- 1 ZONE: REAR YARD NOT LESS THAN 10 FEET IN DEPTH; A CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT AS DESIGNED. THE SITE PLAN MAKESI OR 6W 1,/ 4 I 3611.12 TG 1 I v° 2. 1 hlbRYSB I / coNc
I3474cI .

T696
I I
I C 364. 0 PAD 111 Ill1\I d59.02T I/ I I 34x9 I LOTS 1- 15 SECOND STORY PORTION SHALL NOT BE CLOSER THAN 20 FEET EFFICIENT USE OF THE SITE WHICH RESULTS IN LIMITED PHYSICALI SEC/ 25 T 1S I 35 . 12 IE- 1 ' , 4, 082 SF o I I I II 3487 J-_J479
I
R+ W SBIV x 1 62518 SD PVC' - N .
14 G c 157. 92 W) I
0 Eml
3 6 FROM THE REAR PROPERTY LINE AREA TO MEET THE SETBACK STANDARD WITHOUT MAKING 11 360. 3 FG s_==_ _____________ BACKYARDS UNFEASIBLY SMALL. THEREFORE THE EXISTING SETBACK 1' +
J
AIJA: 166- a83-20 3646
I ' 1 8CB
6 3 3
o cn 1 0-- --- „ --- ----
1 I
t----/
I It I ' R E TE 0 5- II 11 \ T1 2 3 . DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD NEED TO BE REDUCED IN ORDER DECK 3$$-----______ J
3665
I LJ 15
a Q 1 D E -- ROJE T II ASPH
34& 5 348. 4
ASPH
U7N.6 / I l / / I OUN RY 5, 0 _
f
II T 11' C m •
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . FORTH E PROJECT TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE DENSITY ALLOWED I
5' I II $ 90 BW _- \ B 9 N THROUGH THE STATE DENSITY BONUS LAWS.P. ROW 13 12 I

DITC TYPE B
m
6'' Y B I I I\ ^\ \
f- -_ B ,-° - rt-_-
a1 T 1 364. 0 PAD 363. 6 PAD m_
I PER DRSDDJ 363 \ I I 4. __ _ m
o -\ O I
3, 656 SF 3, 895 SF 1 I a ,
N I EX. CONCRETE
5°I° 2. 75 1 0 - 1 . 0 PROP. FIR I
i
I II mil` N THE5 3 18. 54. 050 PER STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AB2345 AND THE PROJECT PROVIDES A TOTAL OF 60 PARKING SPACES THAT BT>
24 I

5.0'SYSBf- r H 3. J' __ `\' u_ so +- fl ° O TW DITCH WAIVER# 3:

HYDRANT I I 3s}' PARKING SEMI- RURAL SUBDIVISION: 2 GARAGE STALL AND + 2. 5 GUEST 65915( P - UNIT WITH 2- 3 BEDROOMS: 1. 5 PARKING EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AB2345 AND PE MISSION Td SMH# 5
I

I TC/ I I
SD

SD SD SD
GGN - STALLS; ADDITIONAL OFF- STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED AND UNIT WITH 4 BEDROOMS: 65915( P) REQUIREMENT FOR DENSITY BONUS PROJECTS. THE PROJECT GR DE STA 12+10.3 = 46 FL_
LOTS 1 15

2. 5 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED. THIS PROJECT MAKES EFFICIENT USE OF THE SITE WHICH RESULTS IN LIMITED o m =
X .
8 I€- " SD f M ASIN AND 18" 362k- R 2 S
Ii-- - - 1 c , 6,, 20.0 TYP.o m SITE PROVIDES 2 GARAGE STALLS, 2 GUEST STALLS PHYSICAL AREA TO PROVIDE OFF- STREET PARKING, BUT THE 357. 41 IE 362. 5 FG
STA. 10+ 283
gAS IN SDR CBYPA PIPE \
IN DRIVEWAY, & NO OFF- STREET PARKING GARAGES/ DRIVEWAYS PROVIDE AMPLE RESIDENT & GUEST PARKING.S 361. 63 RIM PROVIDED.7, 599 SF APE 0 DAYLIGHTy\SEEII T9LONSHEET2.
357. 6 FG \ ES36 . 10 TW / \\
S 56; 4
35 21300 SF \ 1 35 . 20 BW) I5
DENSE36
H 9 CONCESSION# 1: 18. 28. 060 PER PLAN LOT SIZE LESS THAN 10, 000 SF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD PRECLUDEv BRUSH c>
w-, N w
361.104TCCn 1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE R- 1 ZONE: MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF AT LEAST 10, 000 SFI CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT AS DESIGNED. THE SITE PLAN MAKES 0 IE 12' D PVC LOTS 1- 15 EFFICIENT USE OF THE SITE WHICH RESULTS IN LIMITED PHYSICALI 1 M m00 L- 4 0', V- 2. 5' \\ DNS
ro M ` \ CO 359`. 98 TG I `"
LIG Opp
s o VR_qf.

ASPH
AREA TO MEET THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 10 000 SF PER THE R- 11\ I ni
r a CUfi51NLE
ZOINING ORDINANCE. THEREFORE THE EXISTING R- 1 LOT SIZEI m I Mx' o 362. 0IE 11 W

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD NEED TO BE REDUCED IN ORDER
III 18" D PVC \ h
o '
3368\ FOR THE PROJECT TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE DENSITY ALLOWED 3647 110-
3,
756
PAD 0
1?611 ETC'\
V, " 4. 9'
BW \\
3645
1\RYSB 3, 756 SF A 9,/ lc F W : S
THROUGH THE STATE DENSITY BONUS LAWS.

DENSE I
LO
U)
4-
i )
BRUSH
RYSB
I 10 9TF0A
I

4. 6 I
WAIVER# 4: 17. 16. 010( C) MINIMUM LOT WIDTH EXCLUDING SIDE YARD THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD PRECLUDE THE360. 61 FL C M H 355 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH EVERY LOT AT LEAST 50 FEET WIDE EXCLUSIVE OF SIDE REQUIREMENTS IS 32 FEETPC A
BRUSH 1 363. 0 PAD
0) 3
o cn
I ,
P 6 - ALLOWABLE DENSITY UNDER THE STATE DENSITY BONUS LAW. THE PM 6 7 I r' I 1 3,585 SF "' ci>oQ
yS
5130SEC-2-5T S LOTS 1- 15 YARDS REQUIRED IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE LOT IS LOCATED PROJECT AS PROPOSED MAXIMIZES THE NUMBER OF UNITS NSE ti I I BRIM MEASURED AT THE BUILDING SETBACK LINE ALLOWABLE ON THE SITE STATE DENSITY BONUS LAW ANDII\ 76 1
11 APN: 166 1 3- 44 PROP. BRQW
r

TREES I
93 IE \\
t' \
364. 5 DITCH TYPE B \\\ Tom- ' - v, I 355I8 1\ ` APN. - 11 SUPPORTED BY THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED. THEREFORE, THE 3614
I I

F /
PER SDRSD D- 75 \ m 1-1
c EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD LIMIT WOULD NEED TO BE 36x5
I 1 I1 9 olv Ln > I SE
PR P. RETAIT7IP I REDUCED IN ORDER FOR THE PROJECT TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS R SB I -- 363. 5 PAD m
S75
DESIGNED.
1 77
i
3656
i RQJECT I 1 5, 360 SF oI}

BO DARY
I
I- - 1Cn _ ' _ 3( f BW)-'
WAIVER# 5: 17. 16. 010 I 4 OUT OF 15 UNITS DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LOT1 I I 2-55 O THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD PRECLUDE

10. 0 I_- - - - -
35B6 MINIMUM LOT DEPTH LOT DEPTH SHALL BE AT LEAST 90 FEET AND SHALL BE NO DEPTH. 9 OUT OF 15 UNITS DO NOT HAVE A LOT CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT AS DESIGNED. 4 UNITS DO NOT MEET I
BRUSH \\\\ 111 RYSB 1 8
o}
T
PROP. F tT 0 ' F `/' ARl'\\ LOTS 10- 13 GREATER THAN THREE TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH DEPTH LESS THAN THREE TIMES THE AVERAGE THE REQUIREMENT DUE TO THE OFFSET CUL- DE- SAC AND LAYOUT I
3666
I
3656
I I I 361. 31 FL
I
v
1 HYDRANT
I i
3-
WIDTH. DESIGN OF PRIVATE STREET B. THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 3 7
1 I i • i 36% 3 i I I I 364. 5 PAD
m
3593
3693
I
3676 I I
I B I I 5, 618 SF o r o
N
r \ WOULD NEED TO BE REDUCED SINCE THE PRIVATE STREET IS REQUIRED N TO MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIREMENTS AND CANNOT CHANGE.- - - - I IU, 3623- _ _
360. 5 THE 9 UNITS THAT HAVE LARGER LOT DEPTHS THAN THREE TIMES THE365 s4
v,
ASPH
3606

AVERAGE WIDTH, MAXIMIZES ON PROVIDING THE LARGEST LOT SIZES o co s24
I
THAT COULD BE PROVIDED.

I I I I Cn - 365. 0 PAD
co
I• I I /
r, } I I WAIVER# 6: 16. 57. 040 24 FOOT PAVED WIDTH WITHIN A 35 FOOT ROAD 3695

ROCKS M

0.0' YSB r i NO ON- STREET PARKING IS BEING PROPOSED. THE EXISTING5, 616 SF cn 363• - - I I' PRIVATE STREET WIDTH 32 FOOT PAVED WIDTH WITHIN A 40 FOOT ROAD EASEMENT EASEMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD PRECLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF THEI 769.5 CONC369.E I I 367.6 \
366. 4

I-- I- I
I 364. 4 FjQ. J IlBRUSH 6 36. 5 s
PROJECT AS DESIGNED. IF THE STREET MET THE REQUESTED STANDARDI F - T - - ( n I 363. 53 FG 1 o
C.0 _ _ _
200' F SB 0' i, 1

THE LOT DEPTHS WOULD NEED TO BE FURTHER REDUCED AND

10. 01' I I 6 fi - I I
B . RTAINING WALL I / THEREFORE THE PRIVATE STANDARD NEEDS TO BE REVISED. 37Q4 I II I 36B5

1.0,
I 1

BRUSH RYSB I
I
365. 5 PAD
a I
3644

5. ' 11 . 0' 5. 5' i
3655 5, 613 SF u
6 15. I I \ I WAIVER# 7: PER THE CITY OF VISTA LANDSCAPE MANUAL, RETAINING SPLIT FACED NON PLANTABLE CMU RETAINING THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WOULD MAKE THE 36: 6 \ \\\\
I \
1 I
i I RETAINING WALL TYPE WALLS GREATER THAN 5 IN HEIGH SHALL BE PLANTABLE WALL MAINTENANCE FOR A PLANTABLE WALL DIFFICULT. THE WALL IS ONLY 370. E 364527FL T I 3646 LOT 15 VIEWED BY THE NEIGHBORING ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE WALL IS I 5 CURRENTLY DESIGNED WITHIN THE PROJECT' S BOUNDARY.
369. 4
I
365. 7 PAD _ m
1 W# 2
I 36A6
37041
P L B I I / PCL C' I \\ PCL D ) 5, 611 SF 61,E 20. 0' YS I I
I
STA. 1 [+
J_M
4_____ l__- I I WAIVER# 8: STORM DRAIN EASEMENT MINIMUM 10 FOOT WIDE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDE STORM DRAIN THE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LOT 15 CANNOT 37X.4 I I / L - - 1363.61 RIM 364. 7 WIDTH OF STORM DRAIN EASEMENT EASEMENT I \ I PM 6697
r \/ P6M6691 I \8 7
PM 6697/ 766. 5 1 POR LOT 16
I BE 10 FEET WIDE DUE TO THE BUILDING EDGE OF THE PROPOSED HOUSE. 13_54.73 IE_ _ I LOT 15 IF THE EASEMENT WERE TO BE 10 FEET, THE DESIRED WIDTH OF THEAPN: 1 3 APN: 166- 18 - 46 A N 16 1- 47 T HOUSE COULD NOT BE ACCOMMODATED.37x6 I Ir `, I
z
1 1
I 20.0'F
N
P54 ,BIE S 1t--
I 1 \ FflP. BROW I/ I 4 I I 4W SBM
L71.41
C0 11,
I

DITCH TYPE B
0 366. 0 PAD -
m I A Na166-184-11
377.E
37f. 5 _--\ I
J L j PER-ZDR_SB[ 7
Y L
5, 609 F
1 / I
37Q6
1I w
7 1 /
370. 8 \_- Cl)
I
364. 9 I I
3723
1370.E f__ /- \ DECK
i
3732 il.\ N
37 6
I
I
T
j I'll I
I
11_
I
I_
c-oN`c_-_, I-_--\ I-__ r\_\
I\
I1-_---\
I1
1 I
I-
II
I//'
l/ \_--,-
II
I,

I ---- -------
I
III
I`
II
r
I
U--
Z\\
II
I
1 I1l
370. 9•_
II
3 i
III
7_0. 9_----
r_ 1\ 1
1-'/ r/
I/
iI /.
1 I
I
f
II
1II1
9-70.- 9'
II
r
33705
00 L o~\
N
cIIor'
III
LIF-
1I365I!
DECK POOL 366. 5 PAD
137251 5, 6 J
I " II

10. ' 7 SF YS
i- i
RY37I5
3773 CON3735I/
r
S
DEC
co 0__--__-- --
2 20 Y 353
f
f\
8> / IT70.5 I
374. 5
I(
jh
I
I1-TLC_O-
I1S6 36 . 0 PAD
I
374. 6
I
o
L--- - 1 I I r 5, 605 SF Ln
I I
CON° I
IIn [ ' 3s4x
I1 37`45 aES1 1 I
11p.0
375. 5
1T
1 qq T
1 x 1
364E

TREESFI -------------- I I
375. E l I r---- I
111 I I-_ I---------- KSB 1
o PRO . ETAI IN
1 Q.\ I DENSE ---
I ,,_ II1 a 51 367. 5 PAD AL 8 I n
3756 I- 11 X IW 370.80HP 11
N o
REEP1 _ 5, 411 SIF \ m P OP. FHJ C4
I I r
2 364.2
r'6 376. 7
ASPH 376. 7
376. 5 \\ \
37% 8 \
I
I P P. RIW LI" H7 II
EX.

I E . R/ W R STO
364. 94 TC-_
w_ 3765
w
S_
3756
7 fAN E 35 5 0 PA- - _ SI 1 SIG { R1-
3 w'
w _ 376. 7 SAS I
w
w =
76 4- S
s
T
3 3757
s 374. 3

1.5 \ J76. B S
S
MEL
S
s___
SIGN i'_ 3744 5 S
s
S- /
ROSE WAY 34E
O
CONC

JI I E IJ I
mmm - - - - - - - - - - - -
E
S-
S-
WEB i a _ /
t--------- ANCE 350
GK ° E
of
o '- w3.
15 w _ POLE T
2 _
v \
I I PROP. Cl . B EX. CURB,WTTER, ':BI
J7N3
I
377. 5 \ 377. 2 \\
376.6 \\
E
oE3s
Jw yy=- . 1 RAMP I
47 &
SIDEYVALK \
S
s- s/
0 40 80 120
x3
t
1 of \
O==
j w_ •• /
1''
r-
S' S a
11(' 1
E
of 37JE
w
m N m I MELR0 IVAY_ 36 Bw- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- w- L
I`_
ch / V• EfD/^ C[ / 4 -.' w ww
of ^-
I'-- - w----- SCALE: 1" = 40'
LID
CV o
E"

PASCO LARETSUITER
LUUwj
rn O rn
o
LLJ
to I

I /
ll`` ll`/`11`` ll / 1//^/`/v.^'. 2r`/ll``` ll
w
O IY w M Mj

VVOV ISV
X W r_ W Q Cry Q rD Co En M U I-
w a
a w o z UoCo L + San Diego I Solana Beach I OrangeCounty ck
M D LI. 1
z
Ow
coUJ co M M
x LLB o - 1
3 ,
Phone858.259.8212 Iwww.plsaengineering.com
U d
SAVE DATE:----- PLOT DATE:----- FILENAME:hActive Jobs\3334 MELROSEWAY\CIVIL\DRAWING\DISCRETIONARYPLANS\TENTATIVEMAP\3334-TM-TBLOCK.dwg 06/24/2025
C3
16 of 31
15 - LOT TEN IVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
PROJECT FILE NUMBER:

P21 mO130
SHEET 4 OF 6
RV
I
C- I
AP J: 1618 1$
DEN i pollI
L —
LAWYERS TITLE REPORT NO. 321319167,
377.5 L L--- F. t4" 113W/ fJtSC" 4 0 '" \/
1Ib613'41"
T BL11 LI I 6F' RROS19 01 FI' SH DATED 3/ 25/ 2021
ESMT PARCEL C 3& C 6 ft189 26 29'W 1 3.94' r /_ IIE11W. 0 ROAD, SEWER,& PUBLIC NC N 0° 32'52" E 3.93'/ 71
N8 ( 29 W 34' —
f
SCHEDULE " B" EXCEPTIONS PARCEL A
N 89° 25'51" W 8.97' UTILITIES
o
N 00° 38' 09"E 10.00'
3705 O 364. 6 l
N 89° 25' 51" W 191. 06'
A
W1129.00' I I / //
i — — 4 — YD. 3/ 4" IP MQ$ C" LS 307" P
N 89° 25' 51" W 191. 06' 97
3656
I I B H 3555 II 40Y
O

UNSPECIFIED WIDTH EASEMENT TO VISTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT 89 ® W 13'9.02
36 y\ RO 194g1,' tgSH I III

U E , TIE Y
I =
EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE PURPOSES PER BOOK 1136, PAGE 239, N 89° 25' S1" W X t 00° 2' 52" (
DECK —
Imo—
DFC
RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1925, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)
N00° 38' 09" E 10.0
r - - - - - - I—- - f f= J 2393' I
5 \\
I III I LOT LOT8
I
o
x
3694
x
I
N 0 32' 5
x
III I
J
MAP 12195 I MAP 12195
I 367., J57. 6 \
20' WIDE ROAD EASEMENT PER BOOK 142, PAGE 301, RECORDED I i ESMT PARCEL C 5 \
J70. 5
I /.

5. 1 26 1 . 00'
I"I III
I I I
AUGUST 13, 1932

I I I I I DENSE
10 i I 13665I
36X6
I I
I PARCELC \
35%5
III
TREES
I I I/
a UNSPECIFIED WIDTH SAN DIEGO GAS& ELECTRIC COMPANY37x.6 14 I FOR W 1/ SEC15T11$R4W I
359. 5 \
o III I(
CDNC
13 347. 4

O EASEMENT, FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS, EGRESS PURPOSES ESMT PARCEL C 6 l / 365s SBMI I I c n^
w

I II / II
34B7 47B
L PER BOOK 651, PAGE 212, RECORDED MAY 10, 1937
NI V
col AP . 166- 183- 20 .
5 IOJ 1 i'O135B6 I
V J4. 6

PLOTS SOUTHERLY OF THIS PROPERTY- DOES NOT AFFECT THIS
364. EI DECK DE4CK11, Il of I I
3s,. 6 Ln
I
J L —
I

PROPERTY
w I w wl
366. 5 /
I
X ° \
3 M I <
DENSE
CDNC
I r
34B4
34B. 5 348. 4
ASPH L
I j
6 Z \ API 1 183- 17 o
II
I\\ USH
l \_
G
ASPH
5 50' WIDE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY I o o I
f
I \
3594 G \\ =
PARCt CONS__ PER BOOK 832, PAGE 431, RECORDED OCTOBER 21, 1938 o
co
o I \ o l 3635
FD LD" RCE 29271 , A TED
z z zl ° I / / 1
BDENSERUSH —
MAP 111b5, IN FENC I\\\ \
TE'IE RFD. 3/4"IP , NOPLUG,ACCEPTED 6

SAN DIEGO GAS& ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT, FOR PUBLIC
N 86 4915 W 8.35
I
I N 80 27 31 l /
36X6 3624 \

I FOOTING
I v\'\ PER MAP 12195, DN. 0. 5' UTILITIES, INGRESS, EGRESS PURPOSES PER DOC. NO. 88- 205124, N 86' 49' 15" W 10. 02'
I
W 5. 67' 3ss_— RECORDED MAY 3, 1988.
36x.5 N00° 41' 02" E 7. 86 N89 11' " W 68. 1' 0 THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT 1 1\
J606

DISCLOSED OF RECORD, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)N
2731" x
36Jf \\ /
36 6 \
N89 917 W 1 . 06 \
3 w 9 3 F . 2" IP WIF LUG" LS 3465\'\
I \ 3l4"IP (PLUG" RbF`
P R Pf% 144 I\rt\AP 12195, x
DENSE
29'R71" PER'T 12 f'95 RN.

Q FD. 1. 'IP W/ DISC' LS 1162" PER TREES
Q o/ / N86° 49' 15" I I ROS1k401, UPIN', NOTUSED i 360< D . 1. 0'
X - - - -\ p5 \ LAWYERS TITLE REPORT NO. 321319262V W 16. 45' I I " \ FD. 3/ 4 IP W/ DISC" LS 4307" J617
0 x 36e
I \
PE ROS 19401, FLUSH \\
N 3°' 4p, I 96
4 \\ \
1 \\ \\ I DATED 2 2 21
1 FD. 3/4" IP W SC LS 2 6" PER \\
3/ 9/ 0
PM 6697, ROS1 01, DN0. 5, 3s _ \ \

10. 17' NW'LY
362,
360. 6 3535 \\
ASPH
25 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS - PARCEL B
x I
x
BRUSH
z
360. 3

UNSPECIFIED WIDTH EASEMENT TO VISTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT 36% 7
PCL A
359E I EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE PURPOSES PER BOOK 1136, PAGE 239, x
PM 669rx- 5
1 x5 RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1925, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)
o ESMT PARCEL C- 7 i APN: 166 183 44 J
UNSPECIFIED WIDTH ROAD EASEMENT PER BOOK 74, PAGE 498,
tl)// / \ DENSE
I 3636 I /

BRUSH I
F—
X — I
x
3653
BRUSH I \ 36a2 1
35 RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 1932, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)
3555I
I
X

I DENSE
I \
3fi° 4
UNSPECIFIED WIDTH ROAD EASEMENT PER 20512, RECORDED
w // I 36 7. 6 \

X TREES
FEBRUARY 4, 1963; PER 77675, RECORDED APRIL 29, 1964; PER 3684 \
I T6,; 5 / X
I
M72 \
36a6
n\
I\
111503, RECORDED JUNE 22, 1964, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)
LO
I x5
Cl)
O
I,/ 36k 5
I I
BRUSH 3606
TDENSEREES 3575
3 J57. 3\ = 5

UNSPECIFIED WIDTH VISTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT EASEMENT FOR z
V
I I I II 365.. 6 I I 6, 4 \ P 6 S 25 T11S R4W SEWER LINES PER 195231, RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 1970, ( NOT

PLOTTABLE
364. 5 \
1 5
1 - 184- 11 UNSPECIFIED WIDTH EASEMENT TO WERNER P. REINEMANN AND 6 _ __
VIRGINIA S. REINEMANN FOR ROAD, SEWER, AND PUBLIC UTILITY BRUSH
366E 365. E
I P
6 I
35s PURPOSES PER 76- 027345, RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1976, ( NOT ts
3617
I
DENSE

PARCEL A
36x.6 I
359. 3

PLOTTABLE)
369. 3 \
I \
36Y6
I
36z3
I
TREES
I 368. 4
X \
l \
1 1
J
3 PN` I66 184- 10
ASPH
jsa6

UNSPECIFIED WIDTH EASEMENT TO ZORAN RDJEVICH FOR
ROAD, SEWER, AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OPER006- 068 622, I
ROCKS 360.5
x
36: 4
361. 5 RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1976, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)
x
Fa 3624
x — I I
1 I369. 5

I ROCKS
363. 4
362. 5
T695 CDNC369.6 767. 6
36G' f
x I X I 364. 4 3 - ?
BRUSH J635 \\ \
L LAWYERS TITLE REPORT N 0. 321319335
I I II
x\
I I
369. 3
Ir - _Ili
x 36x.4 DATED 3/ 26/ 2021
I
370. 4
X x
II II
3685 \
BRUSH
o 646
x4 I SCHEDULE " B" EXCEPTIONS - APNI I
o
II I \ 1 I

36. 5
O
364.6
I
3676 \ \\
Z
1 - 1 - 2I I
X
y
I \ I 66 83 0

I I II PCL

I X
1 CL C PC'L D
S
3655 36F6 I
I z
3,rxB I
1 1
U
I O

UNSPECIFIED WIDTH EASEMENT TO VISTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT PN--1 6- 183- 45 94 `. I^ AP : 166- 18 - 46 PN: 166 4 I
U
I
EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE PURPOSES PER B K 11 PAGE 2I I3:0. 4 I I I S 0 00 36, G 39,
I PM 6697 I X5. 6
365, 3657
L — r _ — _ _ L — J
364.

RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1925, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)
L. L I I 37Y.4
370.4
36X.7
Q
I I I
B,
I
3665
x
I O

SAN DIEGO GAS& ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT, FOR PUBLIC
7 UTILITIES, INGRESS, EGRESS PURPOSES PER DOC. NO. 88- 205124,z I 377.6
1 36XB /
I
xx = I I M75 \ ` _ — lID 3664
5 III
I` _ RECORDED MAY 3, 1988.

I
x
bbQ
I I

I THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT I I
T66. 5
I DISCLOSED OF RECORD, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)377. 4 37% B I
U3%
2 fi
I I — J7J.5 \ = I
70B
3706—
J —
67 3675
I
I
PORLOT EC 25 T11S R4W
I 372. 3
fl
s I BM 7

TIMES MIRROR CABLE TELEVISION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
3726
I37a8I —
DECK
1—
1 37F2
coNC
M7.2 16BM11 I EASEMENT, RECORDED AUGUST 1, 1988, DOC. NO. 88- 375422, O. R. 0 370. 3 THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOTI I 370. 5 J— — —
L
1 — F — J

DISCLOSED OF RECORD, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)
X POOL
725 U I
367. 4 I
v

I II SAN DIEGO GAS& ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT, FOR PUBLIC 373. 5
37x5 I
IJI 370.9 I y
3773
x
CONC
x 1 \ .
68s
I I 0 40 80 120 O UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES, RECORDED AUGUST I I \
DECK 31, 1988, DOC. N0. 88- 437715, O. R.

I I Ils3 \ 1 ,
3 I — THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT comic L X I /
L — —
I_ 1 05 I I I I coN SCALE: 1" = 40't J74. 5 1 I— I \ 3708
I I I
I l DISCLOSED OF RECORD, ( NOT PLOTTABLE)
I
37x3
1 I
Ilr 36B5
Xe
137% 6 o I I
369. 3\
Y I
1 I
J
II
L
I
I
ASPH
ICONC IIx9
x
3755 OI
37 5
I
1 D S I I I I I
I
I36 5/
I
1 I
TREEIj
x
I— I1
I
I \
3758 « TI,II- I 1
DENSE \
I I X
I
3686
J
1 364. E
7- U 2_
x6 3767
3756
374. 8
2" IP / DI " 2896J I
2 n n n
ASPH 3767 K
28 , a P 697, ROS' 949 ,
TI / \/ F 31 IP WIDISC LS 2609 , 3642
I
376. 5 LEAN G, 1. 0 DN, N. R. held for II
3% 65
3767
3756
3, 3. 5
FLU
I I x line, 24. 8' N\ LiSH
I376.
4 3747
3% 27
f
x
17 37—
3757 M
376. 8
F
OS ( d/_ v J / SIGN
XSIGNO
0 .
7 3% 44
I`
SF WAY 37 4 \
O
365. q
CDNC
3767
I37 Z ROCKS , 372. 6
x\ ' L
3' S3 3735 Ln 36X7 T6x6
ROCKS
H
x— x 374. 3 \ 372. 6 a O
3% 75 377 2 \
x 37. 6 j—
x
3766 366. 365.. 5 3647 364. 2 \
J77J
I
x
x 0
x x x 3,
O5 N8805V " E 363E
x 1 S a IPW/ C X2896 \
6 Ia
372
CDNC
f
3636
PE AP 8 07, R`0 19401
CONC
IN ACPAVE, N 0. 3' s73- - —
ENSE
CGNG
1 16X4
I 3641 J
TAT
1205 MELROSE WAY
TREES
PORTION OF MELROSE WAY DEDICATED PER MAP 8207

PASCO LARET SUITER
z o QSSOUATES
LU San Diego I Solana Beach I OrangeCountyU
I I
Phone858.259.82121 www.pisaengineedng.com
SAVE DATE:----- PLOT DATE:----- FILENAME:hActive Jobs\3334 MELROSEWAY\CIVIL\DRAWING\DISCRETIONARYPLANS\TENTATIVEMAP\3334-TM-TBLOCK.dwg 06/24/2025
C3
17 of 31
15 - LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
PROJECT FILE NUMBER:

P21 mO130
SHEET 5 OF 6
1205 MELROSE WAY
LEGEND

TRACT BOUNDARY
POR SW 1/ 4
SEC 25 T11S
N 89° 27' 08" W

PROPOSED RIGHT- OF- WAY
R4W SBM 24. 00'
APN: 166- 183- 18 F-
I

EXISTING RIGHT
1 89° ' '
N 00° 32' 52" E 9
I

PROPOSED LOT LINE

13. 93' I
0 - - - - -
or

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE
J
IN00°32'52"E co l

EXISTINGACCESS DRIV
LOT 15N 13.
00'
N 89° 27' 08" W LOT 8
co
I

O ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
oM
MAP 12195
1 26. 75' z N 89027' 36" W

97. 18' LOT 7

35. 0' 1 LOT 14
MAP 12195
w

PROPOSED EASEMENTS
1 INDICATES RIGHT OF WAY, PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, AND PUBLIC 4 m o I - - o - - SEWER EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF VISTA POR SW 1/ 4
w
z N 89° 2736" W N 8927' 33 'T
5Q,]-4' 4'47SEC 25 T11S LiJ 2 INDICATES STORM DRAIN EASEMENT R4W SBM of w I I NM
APN: 166- 183- 20 U) N I
ILLJ
M
Q z I LOT13Ujzr
LOT121 LOT TABLE
I o
I I o
0-11
N 00° 37' 39" E LOT N0. AREA( S. F.)
z
o 6. 02
1 5, 411 SF
0 N 3°14, o M zo LOT A R= 48. 00' 2 5, 605 SF
34-20'OW
N 89022'21" W N 89622' 21" W - L= 31. 76'
I
0= 95° 00' 52"

38.68' 62. 52' R= 45. 50' 3 5, 607 SF
0 0 76 I L= 75. 45
0= 73° 46' 52" N M 226\
4 5, 609 SF
R= 24. 00 N 89022' 21" W
L= 30. 91' 110.41' 5 5, 611SF
o
0= 16° 07' 54" 4W LOT 11R= 24. 01'
A= 37° 54' 33"
6 5, 613 SF
L= 6. 76'
R= 24. 00' L= 15. 88' A= 39° 14' 43" I 7 5, 616 SF o
N 51° 27' 56" W 14. 24' R=45. 50'
N 89° 22'21" W L= 31. 17' 8 5, 618 SF

77. 88' N 89° 22' 21" W

1. 17' 9 5, 360 SF
0= 66° 35 57 0= 06° 51 29
10 3, 585 SF
PCL A oLOT 10 R=45. 48' R= 43. 17' POR LOT 16
I
PM 6697 L= 52. 87'
I
L= 5. 17' SEC 25 T11S 11 3, 756 SF
APN: 166- 183- 44
N 89° 22'21" W
0= R4W SBM72°32' 31"
104.85' I R= 34. 50' APN: 166- 184- 11 12 3, 895 SF
I 4 L= 43. 68'
13 3, 656 SF
I
LOT 9 N 00° 37' 39" E
7 27' 14 4, 082 SF

PROJECT
BOUNDARY N 89° 22'21" W I
15 4, 702 SF
133.78'
I
w I A 7, 599 SF

PRIVATE
LOT 8 go N STREET A
20, 400 SF

IPRIVATE
z
N 89022' 21 W

35. 0'
I

STREET B
12, 868 SF"
133.73' 1
w
I
LOT
CD
MN
Z
I
N 89022' 21" W
I I
133.68'
I
I
I I
o LOT 6 o N
I
O
O Q
I
Z
I
N 89022' 21" W
W133.63'
w
I--
I
o LOT 5 MN w T

PCL B I PCL C
I
PCL D z Q
I I PM 6697 PM 6697
I
PM 6697 N 89022' 21" W
I I
APN: 166- 183- 45 I APN: 166- 183- 46 APN: 166- 183- 47 4 133.58' af POR LOT 16
I
LU
SEC 25 T11S
R4W SBM
oLOT 4 MN

I I CDI
APN: 166- 184- 11
I
z
I I
N 89022' 21" W
I I I
133.53'
I
w
I I LOT 3 M N
I
o
I z
I I I N 89022' 21" W
I I
133.48'
I I
w
I
LOT 2
I
r- o
I
N
CD
A
I I N 89022' 21" W
I
133.42'
S 89° 22' 21" E
EX. R/
Wo LOT 1 R=970.00' 0= 7° 11' 32"
l L= 54. 59' R= 22. 50' z S 00° 37' 39" W
o L= 2. 82' 16. 20'
M42r'
PR. R/ W
m-Af7 ji
r'
EX. R/ W
Cn EX. R/ W
R= 970. 00' I 0 40 80 120
L= 28. 00' g° " E
MELROSEWAy
4 SCALE: 1"= 40'

CE NTENNIAL PASCO LARET SUITER
DRIVE
o QSSOUATES
San Diego I Solana Beach I OrangeCounty
Phone858.259.82121 www.pisaengineedng.com
SAVE DATE:----- PLOT DATE:----- FILENAME:J:\ActiveJobs\3334 MELROSEWAY\CIVIL\DRAWING\DISCRETIONARYPLANS\TENTATIVEMAP\3334-TM-TBLOCK.dwg 06/24/2025
C3
18 of 31
T
7' 1 IIII I
I
PROJECT FILE NUMBER:

CONC
I Ii
III I _ _ I TG PER PLAN
370. 5
I

4. 6
I I(III P21 mO130
DENSE CB°--

N-C FREEBOARD
TREES
I

SEE TABLE HEREON
A
I I III - - - - - - - - = 3636 BROOKS BOX 3" PVC SCREW CAP 6" WSE i - - D NSE (
T
T _ - - SHEET 6 OF 6
369. 7 /
366. 6 /
3656
3636
I I
S"

2.1 SELF-MITIGATING ABOVE GRADE
y\ 15 I=
D
II
IIIII
I I II
IIIIIIII=
CAREX PANSA PLANTING,EXISTING ACCESS VE / l I
j \
I I1,755SF - -- I
I
r
I I \ I III I1 J
OR APPROVED OTHER, 11J
356.

III I I
III- I 21 PER LANDSCAPE PLANS
6" WEIR ~
Q QoIII= 1I I-3s94
I I I FG PER PLAN 2. 5' INLET 12" WEIR
p iw w
J70. 5 362 6
I MI.
13656 I
I
III

III III
0 Z ~ _
I
360.6
I
l l
1366.5 I
3636 I I IIII III DENSE WEIR NOTCH PONDING
I
35X5
II
TREES
III ORFICE PLATE MIN.

J7x.6 ' I I I I
I 35H6
2: fI I I I I/
1 3474C EXTEND AND WRAP LINER 12" MIN. III= III- ____ - 369. E I 95 1 - _ III III= III= III= III= III= III= III III" III= III III= III= III II= III \\/\\/ ENGINEERED FILL LAYER SHALL BE

SQUARE DIMENSIONS

34. 9
L
PAST EDGE OF BERM 1. 0 FT GREATER THAN
3656
I wJ4% 9 III- III- III- III- III- III- I 1=III- III- III- III- III- I III MINIMUM 18" DEEP" SANDY LOAM" SOIL I
3625 5R6
w I I I O

34. 6
1 III- III- III- III- III- III III- III- II III- III- III II- III MIX WITH NO MORE THAN 5% CLAY PIPE DIA. HOT- DIP
J / l / l 3646
I
36, 6 J L - - d L
II III= III= III= III= III= I a I= III= III= I= III= III= I II - /\ MIN 6" GALVANIZED PLATE I I

DECK DECK
I 348 - - - - CONTENT. PERCOLATION RATE
5 / I
DENSE °° N° I
4 3 5 3 4 BACKFILL IN BASIN, AND TO 5' OUTSIDE II III- III- III- III- III- III III- III- III III- III- III II- II \\ \\ AFTER HOLES HAVE I o II I ASPH
ASPH L - - 5- 101N/ HR MINIMUM. 3
37' 6 /
1 I
I I
1 RUSH
l
SHALL CONSIST OF A 2- SACK MIX OF I - II III= III= III= III= III= I I= III= III= II = III= III= BEEN DRILLED I
U\ \\
SLURRY
I_ III 3" NON PERFORATED O O
f l\\ FB T- N III= II INFLOW PIPE
i STANDPIPET
363. I T60. 6
12 L4

BOTTOM AND SIDES OF FLOW THROUGH PLANTER SHALL BE I
DEN IO I\
DENSE _ -

SELF- MITIGATING FLOW
BRU LINED WITH 30 MIL PVC MEMBRANE THAT IS COVERED BY A II d
F

PERMAVOID LAYER
3624
MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES OF CLEAN SOIL, FREE FROM ROCKS 1- III= III= I a° a°/\°
PtU\

TIGHT CAP ON SIZE OF DRILLED ORFICE PER
3615
G O
I I CONC Dom- AND DEBRIS, WITH A MAXIUM 3: 1WITH A MAXIMUM 3: 1 III- II i gQ
r\//\/\\/ / \//\\/ 1/ 2" MAX
HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL H: V SLOPE INCLINATION, OR III i 4 C\\\ \\. 3" MI 1 TERMINAL END OF PIPE TABLE HEREON x
x 36: f \
36 3W FLATTER, AND MEETS THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM t<` 6" DIAMETER PERFORATION PVC 3/ 8" DIA. HOLELOSTA I FLOW CONTROL ORIFICEx 759. 5 \
2 DENSE `
SPECIFICATIONS: PLATE PER DETAIL SUBDRAIN SHALL BE ENCAPSULATED IN TREES
BMP
i `. 2 GRAVEL. GRAVEL AND SUBDRAIN SHALL FLOW CONTROL ORFICE PLATE FG 357. 6
SPECIFIC GRAVITY ( ASTM D792): 1.2 ( G/ CC, MIN.); TENSILE OUTFALL PIPE BE WRAPPED IN MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL.

DENSE
ASTM D882): 73 ( LB/ IN- WIDTH, MIN); ELONGATION AT BREAK CONNECTION TO CATCH BASIN WITH BRUSH
3s96
360
2, 300 SF ASTM D882): 380(%, MIN); MODULUS( ASTM D882): 30 MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL DRILLED ORFICE PLATE LB/ IN- WIDTH, MIN.); AND TEAR STRENGTH ( ASTM D1004): 8 NON- WOVEN GEOTEXTILE)3 3525
LB/ IN, MIN); SEAM SHEAR STRENGTH ( ASTM D882) 58. 4( LB/ IN, NOTE: BACKFILL FOR STORM DRAIN PIPES ENTERING OR EXISTING DMA DATA TABLE3
3535 \\
MIN); SEAM PEEL STRENGTH ( ASTM D882) 15( LB/ IN, MIN). BASIN SHOULD BE BACKFILLED WITH A 2- SACK MIX OF SLURRYASPH I I
3627

I PERVIOUS TOTAL
PROVIDE 18- INCH OVERLAPPED, TAPED OR
DMA N0.

AREA( S. F.)

IMPERVIOU
AREA( S. F.) AREA( S. F.)l l
V. 47
L
36 I GLUED SEAMS AT ALL SEAMS. PLACE
5 SELF- MITIGATING
J59. B
I I \ 3s45 NON- WOVEN FILTER FABRIC ( MIRAFI 140N OR B10FILTRATION BASIN TABLE 1- 1 53, 174 52, 620 105, 794 2, 054 SF
I \ I

EQUAL) ON EITHER SIDE OF PVC LINER TO PROTECT LINER
DENSE
I
I 3636 I / \ '
I DMA 1- FROM PUNCTURE ON ALL SIDES, " SANDWHICHING" THE PVC BASIN NO. ENGINEERED PERMAVOID TOTAL FREE ORIFICE 2- 1 5, 171 537 5, 708
I
BRUSH
I I LINER WITH A FABRIC CUSHION.
x BRUSH
I 1QO -
36 3655 SOIL LAYER LAYER PONDING BOARD SELF-
4, 188 SFI 363
II
3555
1 18" 38. 4" 12" 1. 0' 1.5" MITIGATING
DEN I I \
I II
275 SF

DE- MINIMUS
TRYL
3684 \
36% s
i
AREA
369. 5 I
36J.2 \

BIOFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL
3665
I
9 O
BRUSH
4 360.6 DENSE
F 5 N. T. S.

INFEASIBLE
TREES 3575
TO 2, 346 SF
x \ I 365. E I I
I
3677 TREAT
362. 7
36% 5
GENERAL INFORMATION R ND WATER INFORMATION LANDSCAPE NOTEI BRUSH 1-1 I 367.6 GGROUND U

DENSEI Q
3593 PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE LOS MONOS H.S. A. ( 904. 31) OF I HAVE REVIEWED THE BIOLFILTRATION BASIN LOCATION SHOWN 369. 3
36d7
I
3676
3633
l I '
6%. 6
I I AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK H. A. OF CARLSBAD H. U., HOWEVER GROUND WATER WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED AT THE SITE. SEE ON THE CIVIL PLAN AND CONFIRM THAT THE CONCEPT NDSC;gpF3684 I awl - I 1 DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE ULTIMATELY DISCHARGES TO THE REPORT PREPARED BY: GEOSOILS, INC 3623 W DATED: MARCH 5, 2021 W. O. 8058- A SC LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE COORDINATED AND APPROATE PLANING Az fibQP
LU

36. 5
3606
RECIEVING WATERS OF BUENA VISTA CREEK H. S. A. ( 904. 22) OF AND IRRIGATION WILL BE DIESNG IN THOSE BIOFILTRATION @,y 36P 4
ASPH
BUENA VISTA CREEK H. A. OF CARLSBAD H. U. BASINS.
escAI

36. 5
3624
03- 15- 21

U' POLUTTANTS OF CONCERN- BENTHIC COMMUNITY EFFECTS,
s sAl zsCOARSE SEDIMENT YIELD
Q
63-- - - - - BIFENTHRIN, SELENIUM, TOXICITY, INDICATOR BACTERIA, q Q
EXP. DALE
ROCKS M c
T
3695 3634 I NUTRIENTS, AND SEDIMENTATION/ SILTATION F

OFF- CN-
a- f NO CRITICAL COARSE SEDIMENT YIELD AREAS EXIST WITHIN THIS I95 CO"C 369EII

36. 6 \
3664
I I
364. 4 36
BRUSH Lb . 16
LI
PROJECT SITE.

4. 4
co I, LID SITE DESIGN BMP' S
370. 4
I
x
II
3685 , I WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL REPOTII I

BRUSH I
T64s
6 '-'~
I I I 1. BIOFILTRATION BASIN
II o II I \ I\
365. 5

I TITLE- PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT STORM WATER QUALITY I I II
36X6 \
I
r 2. ROOF DRAIN TO LANDSCAPING
MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR 1205 MELROSE WAY ARCHITECT NOTE
37oB II IT
36% 5 ,

65. 5 - - - 364. 6 I I I
DATE MARCH 2O21
II
1\
1 I
i o
I

3. MINIMIZE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES

PREPARED BY PASCO LARET SUITER& ASSOCIATES MY ARCHITECT' S SEAL AND SIGNATURE IS TO VERIFY THAT THE J694
I
U

KTGY ARCHITECTURAL PLANNING HAS REVIEWED THIS PLAN
I37Q4
I
J \ I
I I
9646

4. PROTECT SLOPES AND CHANNELS PREPARED BY THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND HARD COORDINATED I I 365s L - r

I MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT DOCUMENT

THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN OF THE BUILDING ARCHITURE
377.4 x
370. 4 6s 3647
M6; 5 I o o
I

5. TREE WELLS ACCORDINGLY.
37; 6 I ` 1 Q 367\ 3
t.
8 1TITLE
x\ L 36% 5 366. 4
4 SOURCE CONTROL BMP' S DATE
O
5 I I

I PREPARED BY
1114 37. 8
3 s \ I 1 3706 \ Iol 1. STORM DRAIN STENCILING 3726
37F2
CONC
I
J I I

2. EMPLOY INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLANIA'
367. 3
3705
3703
L \
I I
POOL
I- 3 1 `\ I ' i I
J
I

3. EMPLOY EFFICIENT IRRIGATION AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
TITLE- STORM WATER OPERATIONS& MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR 1205 MELROSE WAY X25I/ I
i
v I
36= I -
II LANDSCAPE DESIGN DATE- MARCH 2O21

E EI I/
3735 I IoI 370.9 I x I I PREPARED BY- PASCO LARET SUITER& ASSOCIATES GOT C H N ICA L NOTE I37J.
5 377. 3 CONC
I I \ I- T I DECK -
36B3
I
3653 I HAVE REVIEWED THE SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS FOR 3745 I i I
1 L!° a__ BMP NOTES RESPONSIBLE PARTY INFORMATION THIS PROJECT AND CONFIRM THE SELECTED POST3705 1 I I \
370. 9
X
T I r L
CONSTRUCTION BMPS HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED, COORDINATED p Atr FQ 37F6
37x3 1
I I
369. 3\
I
r
I 368. 5
I I T 1. THESE BMPS AREA MANDATORY TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER' S ZORAN DJORDJEVICH AND JUSTIFIED AS REQUIRED BY THE C. O. V. BMP DESIGN c°- \
z.
91)611
AS"' 3649RECOMMENDATIONS OR THERE PLANS MANUAL.
375.. 5
3745
I I I
I 2. NO CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED BMPS ON THIS SHEET WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL 551 LYNWOOD DRIVE certIed 56 _.

T. 59 x
o I ok - \ I
TREE \\ I' I FORM THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT EnginearIng i 375. 8
DENSE
I I
W.

I I) 3. NO SUBSTITUTIONS TO THE MATERIAL TYPES OR PLANTING TYPES WITHOUT PRIOR ENCINITAS, CA 92024 n>' Qe° iDQiet '
Es
I \ I ` ` I2- TREE WELL# 1 \( 1 X
36AB 9 Q'
3756
f-,.-
3652 APPROVAL FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER DPCpLIFO 3767
AS 3 ,
37XB I
f
jDE-MINIMIS
2 4. NO OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED UNTIL THE CITY INSPECTOR STAFF HAS 376. 5
375.. 6
AREA 275 SF I INSPECTED THIS PROJECT FOR APPRORIATE BMP CONSTRUCTION AND 3x353% 6.
64 MELROSEWAY J INSTALLATION.
37r5. 7
3% 2. 7
376. 8 4
x

SIGNO O
3757\
CON3= 4f 3734 \ l /
l
1 4
c
i3s54
Z ROCKS 7. 6
INFEASIBLE ?(
ROCKS
3735
TREE WELL# 2
AREA TO BE \\
363E

SOIL INFORMATION
37X3 5726
366. E 365 TREATED

64. 23% 75 / 377. 3766 \
3736 ry-
x
x 37,. 7 2, 346 SF
364. E J
Z 363. E
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: TYPE D
0 40 80 ` 1 0
a 3722 \ J` CONC 363. 6--
36x4
I 364. 3 J °"
c

POST- CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT BMP OPERATION
SCALE: 1"= 40'
TREES

MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE DETAILS

LEGEND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT APPROVAL NO:

DESCRIPTION SYMBOL
O& M RESPONSBILE PARTY DESIGNEE: PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS, INC LOT NUMBER 1
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83
BMP ID#

BMP TYPE SYMBOL QUANTITY DETAIL PLAN DETAIL CONSTRUCTION

BMP DESCRIPTION

INSPECTION MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE METHOD QUANTITY SHEET DRAINAGE DIRECTION SET SHEET NO. NO. NORTHING EASTING CONFIRMATION FREQUENCY FREQUENCY NUMBER( S)

DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA O
ROOF DRAIN TO 30 ( TWO PER
i

LANDSCAPING PAD

EDUCATION PROGRAM ( SOURCE CONTROL) ANNUAL AS NEEDED EMPLOYEE EDUCATION PROGRAM N/ A N/ A

DMA EXHIBIT

TYPE- B CURB INLET O AREA NECESSARY

BIOFILTRATION
1 SIGNAGE & STENCILING ANNUAL AS NEEDED
REPAIR

NECESSARYAND/
OR REPLACE AS 3 N/ A
PASCO LARET SUITER1205 MELROSE WAY

BROOKS BOX
STORM

O STENCILING
3 BIOFILTRATION BASIN ANNUAL AS NEEDED

MWING AND

AONECESSAREBRIS

COLLECTION
Y. REPAIR AS NEEDED
1 N/ A VISTA,
1'
o /
A\
WSOCO/AWESSCALE: 1'= 40' n1 n1 IS
RIP RAP TREE WELL 2 TREE WELL MONTHLY AS NEEDED

INSPECT TREE HEALTH&
2 N/ A DATE: JUNE 2021 San Diego I Solana Beach I OrangeCounty

REPAIR/ REPLACE AS NECCESSARY
Phone858.259.82121 www.pisaengineedng.com
SAVE DATE:----- PLOT DATE:----- FILENAME:hActive Jobs\3334 MELROSEWAYUVIL\ DRAWING\DISCRETIONARYPLANS\TENTATIVEMAP\3334-TM-TBLOCK.dwg 06/24/2025
C3
19 of 31
0 N
VICINITY MAP FL< AN71 N6 LE6ENn wUGOLS

LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN
SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ZONE 5
TREES 4
aotenda Drive EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED
PROPERTY LINE If SEE EX 1STI N& TREE INVENTORY LIST ON LEFT

EMERGENCY
VEHICLE ACCESS a EXISTING CONCRETE DITCH U
TREE WELL TREES - 24" BOX SIZE 0
ULMU5 P. ' TRUE GREEN' GHINESE ELM M CN
LOT 15 f o O
I S
Q
PE. 362. 5
I MELROSE WAY STREET TREE - 24" BOX SIZE N U
PRIVATE YARD SLOPES OVER 5' HT. o ULMUS P. ' TRUE GREEN' GHINESE ELM MU 0 STORM DRAIN EASEMENT I3: TO BE LANDSCAPED
PER CIVIL ENG 1NEER' S
w STREET TREE ( INTERNAL AND TOT LOT TREES) - 24 BOX SIZE I>PLAN LOT 14 Melrose Wo
GHITALPA TASHKENTENSI5 GHITALPA L
O U
Q
f
PE. 363. 1 GEIJERA PARVIFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW L
PROPERTY LINE 112

LAURUS NOBI L IS BAY LAUREL L
co
3 I S 1TE North SHRUBS AND GROUNDGOVER
Iw f PARK LOT— SEE NTS
1 ENLARGEMENT AT RIGHT SLOPE SHRUBS - I- 5 GAL.

V1
LOT 13 I I

BAGGHARIS CENTENNIAL COYOTE BRUSH L
I> I PE. 364. 2 I I r \ STORM DRAIN EASEMENT

CEANOTHUS ' CENTENNIAL' CENTENNIAL GEANOTHUS L
LOT 12
I EXISTING TREE INVENTORY SIGHTLINE AND PARKWAY SHRUBS - 1-5 GAL.

PE. 363. 8
C96 DIANELLA ' LITTE REV LITTLE REV. FLAX LILY L

NUMBER SPECIES CALIPER STATUS SENECIO SERPENS BLUE CHALK STICKS L O PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT B10— FILTRATION BASIN U
1 EUCALYPTUS SPP. 9" TO BE REMOVED

VERBENA DE LA MINA DE LA MINA VERBENA L
42 TUBULAR STEEL FENCE C0
Sys WITH MAINTENANCE GATE 2 PYRUSSPP. 6" TO BE REMOVED SCREENING SHRUBS — 5 GAL. N LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTI GO5A TEXAS SAGE L
w S
3 SCHINUSTEREBINTHIFOLIUS 811 TO BE REMOVED ARBUTUS GOMPAGTA NO COMMON NAME L N w
w
W- W— — W— W 4 SCHINUSTEREBINTHIFOLIUS 24" TO BE REMOVED WESTRIN& IA FRUTIGOSA COAST ROSEMARY L EXISTING 5'- 6' STUCCO
5 OLEA SPP. 18" TO BE REMOVED O MASSING SHRUBS AND & ROUNDGOVERS — 1- 5 GAL.

WALL TO REMAIN
LOT 1 1 6 SCHINUSTEREBINTHIFOLIUS 6"
SALVIA SPP. SAGE L
TO BE REMOVED z
PE. 363. 0
57RELITZIA R. JUNCEA' BIRD OF PARADISE L
s
7 CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 6" TO BE REMOVED BOUGAINVILLEA SPP. BOUGAINVILLEA L J
Q
L SCREENING SHRUBS GALL 15TEMON LITTLE JOHN L 1TTLE JOHN 50TTLEBRU5H L s

AGAINST WALL
8 WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA 18" TO BE REMOVED
ALOE SPP. ALOE L

PROPOSED STREET LIGHT
r
9 JACARANDA MIMOSIFOLIA 6" TO BE REMOVED AGAVE SPP. AGAVE L LOT 10
PROPERTY L INE MUHLENBER& IA RI& ENS DEER GRA55 L
WPE. 363. 0 10 SCHINUSTEREBINTHIFOLIUS 6" TO BE REMOVED CONCRETE 51 DEWALK
L
PARKWAY GROUNDGOVER - ( FLATS a 12" O. G. w

ZI DEL ALBA WHITE IGE PLANT L
r— — —
N
4) GEIJERA PARV IFLORA STREET STORM DRAIN EASEMENT' ROSEMAR NUS SPP. ROSEMARY L O LOT 9 I TREES ON EAST S 1DE OF STREET PER CIVIL ENGINEERS PLAN SLOPE GROUNDGOVER - ( FLATS ® 12" O. G.) PE. 363. 5
PROPOSED 6, TAN VINYL FENCE
BAGGHARIS ' PIGEON POINT' COYOTE BRUSH L w
N
C/)
LL—— — — — — — 510— RETENTION BASIN — ( I GAL. @ 18" O. C.) U
I - - - - - - - i PARK LOT ENLARGEMENT TURF JUNGUS PATENS CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH L i

GAREX TUMULI COLA BERKELEY SEDGE L
QLOT 8

PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT I
I
PE. 363. 5 TURF- SOD z

HYBRID BERMUDA ( TIF GREEN) SOD H Q
1- -- - - - - - - - -

D SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S
I I
s o o D D so so s so so s s s D D D
LOT 7 u PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
PE. 365. 0 PER CIVIL ENG 1NEER' S PLAN
L- — _—_—_— — —
PROPOSED 6 TAN I
r— —— —— — — — NOTES:

VINYL YARD FENCE LOTI I 6
1 PE. 365. 5 N
I. ALL SLOPES ( 4:! OR STEEPER) WILL BE PROVIDED WITH REINFORCED STRAW MATS ( SC Q L - _ _ _ _ _ _ 150 MANUFACTURED BY NORTH AMERIGAN GREEN, 1- 500- 4- 73- Ig65, OR CITY APPROVED C) EQUAL).

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL w
W Q
I
LOT 5 2. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS, INCLUD IN& SLOPES ( 4: 1 OR STEEPER) THAT ARE GRADED OR Q U) PROPERTY LINE I PE. 365. 7. 0 ODISTURBED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE PROVIDED WITH PERMANENT IRRIGATION Z U) I I TO MEET C 1TY REQUIREMENTS. 0 01
JLL3. NO OVERHEAD IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 24" OF ANY NON- PERMEABLE 0 W OI ——— —— — — I SURFACE
1 LOT 4
PE.

I 4. TREES ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN 10' LOOF ANY DRIVEWAY i1 I M CD
L______ _ - _ - -
i
TURF U
0 5' 10' 30' 5. PLANT MATERIALS OVER 50" HT. OR WITHOUT AN 5' MINIMUM CLEARANCE ARE I
r-
t
PROHIBITED WITHIN STREET INTERSECTION SIGHT TRIANGLES.

I CONCRETE SEATING AREA W ITH A PICNIC
ALL SLOPES 4: I OR GREATER MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS. THIS APPLIES TOI I PE. 366. 5 I TABLE AND BENCH AND SHADE TREES
I
i
ALL SLOPES EVEN THOSE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS:

FIRE HYDRANT BIKE RACK North Scale 1 - 10 A. ALL GRADED SLOPES MUST BE PERMANENTLY IRR IGATED WITH A CENTRALLY CONTROLLEDPER CIVIL ENG 1NEER' S PLAN r- -- - - - i I SYSTEM WITH NO OVER SPRAY. DATE: 5/ 51/ 2022 LOT 2 I, STREET TREE ( TYP.) TO BE B. GROUND COVERS MUST BE PLANTED FROM LINERS OR FLATS AT 12" O. G. OR I GALLONS AT

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
I
PE. 367. 0 LOCATED 3' BEHIND SIDEWALK, IS" O. G. DRAWN BY: LL PER CIVIL ENGINEER' S PLAN 1 I WITH ROOT BARRIER C. PROVIDE I ONE GALLON SHRUB FOR EACH 100 SF OF SLOPE AND I FIVE GALLON SHRUB FOR EVERY 200 SF OF SLOPE. JOB NUMBER:

D. PROVIDE TREES ON ALL SLOPES AT A RATE OF ONE 15 GALLON TREE PER 500 SF OF STREET TREE ( TYP.)
EXISTING 5 TUBULAR STEEL
SLOPE ON ALL SLOPES 5' OR GREATER VERTICAL HEIGHT. ON ALL SLOPES 5' OR GREATER FILE:
3 i I FENCE TO REMAIN PROVIDE ON 15 GALLON TREE PER 500 SF OR SLOPE PLUS ONE 5t\ LOT 1

I VERTICAL HEIGHT,
REVISIONS:PE. 367. 5 I GALLON TREE PER EACH I,000SF OF SLOPE. d0l E. REINFORCED STRAW MATS ( SG 150 MANUFACTURED BY NORTH AMERIGAN GREEN I- 500- 4- 75- 1g65 OR G 1TY APPROVED) MUST BE INSTALLED ON ALL SLOPES 5: 1 OR GREATER.

PROPOSED STREET LIGHT
I—
S
S- S- s-_ s_ PER CIVIL ENGINEER' S PLAN1-----
s- S
TOTAL PROJECT SITE: I am familiar with and agree to comply with the requirements for landscape 2) TREE WELLS- WITH ADA- ACCESSIBLE TREE
W-
W
W

2. 21 NET ACREAGE improvements as described in Chapter 18. 56 of the Vista Development GRATES. TREE GRATES WITH FRAME TO BE -°
E°
E-°
E-
o °
W

A - W- W- W
Code and the Landscape Manual. This plan has been prepared in NEENAH ENT. INC. 60" X g0" TREE GRATES:

E-°
E-°
E
compliance with those regulations. I certify that the Ian implements the E-° E-° E_
TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: p g Y p p
MODEL 5552 60" 50. ADA COMPLIANT TREE 0. 2- 1 ACRES regulations to provide efficient landscape water use.

GRATE WITH A 30" X 60" MODEL 5528
EXTENDED PANEL. AVAIL. WWW. GROUPNEI. COM
0 20 40 120
PNDSC FOF SITE LANDSCAPED:

O*PRDL,C.N
q..
12%
SIGHT LINE- PLANT MATERIAL TO BE MAX. 24" HEIGHT. ANY Applicant Date

TREE THAT FALLS WITHIN A SIGHT LINE SHALL BE LIMBED
North Scale 1„ - 40,
SIG A URE 1
AND MAINTAINED AT LEAST 8' ABOVE FIN 1SH GRADE s/ 1/2022

THE SITE WILL HAVE A DEDICATED DATE

POTABLE WATER METER FOR
Lacndscape
5/ 31/ 2022 s 3/ 31/ 23
Architect Date
EXP. DATE
HOMEOWNER' S ASSOCIATION IRRIGATION. F

OFCALF OF
SHEETS
06/24/2025
C3
20 of 31
0 O

WATER CONSERVATION PLAN C
ETWU ( Annual Gallons Required) = MAWA ( Annual Gallons Allowed) = U
I Eto x 0. 62 x ETAF x Area ETo)( 0. 62) j( ETAF x LA) + (( 1- ETAF) x SLA)] 0) PROPERTY LINE 1f
I ETo - see Appendix A in Water Efficient Landscape ETO = 51. 1) LA is the total landscape of all hydrozone areas in sq. ft. a WATER CONSERVATION NOTES11 Design Manual. SLAis the total special landscape area in square feet.

0.62 is the conversion factor to gallons per sq. ft. ETAF is 0. 42 for all areas I. ALL IRR16ATION SHALL INCLUDE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT WATERING U
o
Efficiency.ETAF is Plant Factor/ Irrigation
LOT 15 f
y METHODS UTILIZING HUNTER MP ROTATOR LOW- FLOW IRRIGATION HEADS AND T
R
I CN
PE. 362. 5 Area is the Landscaped Area for each hydrozone. IN- LINE DRIP TUBING. E-- O

2. ALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC RAIN SHUT- OFF 13-
I WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET SENSORS. N U
U 5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL UTILIZEDL IZED 15 CLA551 F IED A5 ' LOW OR MODERATE WATER o REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ( ETo) 51. 1 USE' BY WUCOL5 WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES).LOT 14 ne PE. 363 1 4. 100% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA IS PLANTING ZONE 5, It p Hydrozone#/ Planting Plant Factor Irrigation Irrigation ETAF Landscape Area Estimated Total NATURALIZING/ TRANSITIONAL. O U a) PF) b) Efficiency ( PF/ IE) In Square Feet Water Use 5. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL RECEIVE REGULAR MAINTENANCE AND co Iw f
Description Method ( c) ETAF x Area ( d) MANAGEMENT DESIGNED TO MAXIMIZE HEALTHY GROWTH co
U)--- ^
IE) ETWU) 6. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL RECEIVE COMPLETE AND APPROPRIATE SOIL Q PREPARATION. LOT 13 I
PE. 364. 2 I I } Regular Landscape Areas 1. ONLY LOW VOLUME OR SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION SHALL BE USED TO IRRIGATE n I I
PE. 363 8 1
I
H1- PRIVATE YARD SLOPES 0, 3 Rotor 0. 75 0. 40 2, 316 926 29, 350 ANY VEGETATION WITHIN 24" OF AN IMPERMEABLE SURFACE. Q) F II 5. PLANTI N6 AREAS SHADED BY BUILDINGS SHALL BE AMENDED TO IMPROVE H2- BASIN 0. 3 Rotor 0. 75 0. 40 4, 243 1, 697 53, 771
DRA INA6E AND AVOID REMA IN IN6 NET BETWEEN IRR 16AT1 ON CYCLES. o
H3- PARKWAYS & COMMON AREAS 0, 3 Drip 0. 90 0. 33 3, 980 1, 327 42, 031 Drip 0. 90 0. 33 1, 320 440 13, 940
s r + + + + + + + + + +*+*+ + +
5 I
H- 6 STREET TREES 0. 5 Drip 0. 90 0. 56 120 67 2, 112
N
w
s- 1
Totals 11 979 4, 457 141 , 205 NOTES: CN
W
f++}}} 4++*++++ 4+ 4 +++++
w_ w_ w_ w_ L w
s
Special Landscape AreasD
H- 5 RECREATIONAL TURF 1. 0 1, 387 1, 387
1• AREAS SHALLOWER THAN 5: 1 SHALL RECEIVE 5 INCHE5 OF BARK 1 LOT 11 MULCH, B 10- FILTRATION BA51 N5 SHALL NOT RECEIVE BARK MULCH. A 1 PE. 363. 0 S
Totals 0 MINIMUM 5" LAYER OF MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED ON ALL EXPOSED Estimated Total Water Use ( ETWU) Total 142, 592 SOIL SURFACES OF PLANTING AREA5 EXCEPT TURF AREAS, CREEPING z S,
Maximum Water Allowance ( MAWA)( e) 159, 398
OR ROOTING GROUN7COVER5, OR DIRECT SEEDING APPLICATIONS Q r WHERE MULCH 15 CONTRA IND IGATED. PRIVATE STREET TREES SHALL J 1 Irrigation Efficiency( IE) Average** 0. 38 RECEIVE A 40 S. F. MIN AREA OF BARK MULCH. 0- LOT 10
1 I 2. TREE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE TREES ARE z1 PE. 363. 0 Average Irrigation Efficiency for overall irrigation system shall meet or exceed 0.75 (total of all efficiency ratings divided PLACED WITHIN 5 FEET PAYED SURFACES IMPROVEMENTS INGLUD INCG Oby number of hydrozones).

WALKS, CURBS, OR STREET PAVEMENT ROOT BARRIERS WILL NOT BE 3 WRAPPED AROUND THE ROOTBALL. ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE J Q 1I LOT 9 I I ETAF CALCULATIONS 510- BARRIER. ALL STREET TREES SHALL RECEIVE ROOT BARRIERS. 11 PE. 363. 5
I W
I I Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must be 0. 42 or below for residential areas and 0. 42 or below for non- residential areas. Provide w W I Totals based on information calculated in Worksheet above. z 1 r I I Regular Landscape Areas Totals All Landscape Areas Totals 0 1 LOT 8
I I Total ETAF x Area ( B) = 4, 457 Total ETAF x Area B+ D) = 4, 457 0 I
PE. 363. 5
Total Area A) = 11, 979 Total Area A+ C) = 11, 979 Uj 1-L - - - - - - - - - - - -
i
N
Average ETAF B) _ ( A) = 0. 37 Site wide ETAF B+ D) - ( A+ C) 0. 37 Q
LOT 7
1 PE. 365. 0
Water Conservation Legend
L - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _
1 1. Low Water Use Private Yard Slopes ( 2, 516 s. f.) 1 LOT 6
IS% Total Landscape Area. Rotating Nozzle Irrigation 1 1 PE. 365. 5

2. Low Water Use HOA Basin ( 4, 245 s. f.)
L- - - - - - - - 52% Total Landscape Area. Rotating Nozzle Irrigation Q v

5. Low Water Use Parkways and Common Areas ( 5, cW s. f.) QI PE 3 5 0 50% Total Landscape Area. In- Line Drip Irrigation 2 LJJ 1L Z 0
L_______ _ _ _ _ _ 4. Low Water Use Street Trees ( 1,160 s. f.) v
I I
1% Total Landscape Area. Deep Root Bubblers LU J L.L.

LOT 4
I
0 Uj 0
PE. 366. 0 3
I

5. High Water Use- Active Recreational Turf ( 1,35 1 s. f.) a_ I
I 10% Total Landscape Area. Rotating Nozzle Irrigation L0

L - - - - - --- - - - - - CD
r-- ----- -
i
b. Moderate Water Use Street Trees ( 120 s. f.) N C) I 1
LOT 3 1% Total Landscape Area. Deep Root Bubblers
1 PE. 366. 5

L---- -- -

F I NO RECYCLED WATER USE PROPOSED
LOT 2
I PE. 367. 0
i
DATE: 5/ 51/ 2022
I
N
THE SITE WILL HAVE A DEDICATED DRAWN BY: LL

I POTABLE WATER METER FOR
HOMEOWNER' S ASSOCIATION IRRIGATION. JOB NUMBER:

LOT 1
I FILE:

PE. 367. 5 PROPERTY L INE
RE\/ 151ONS:

EJOE_°
E_ 171WF_t- R-O- SE- _ W A Y W_ W_ W_.
of _ _
O_
0 20' 40' 120'
PNDSC, p
qRD L/
NCB
North Scale 1" = 40' SIG A
UREDATE 2
s/ 312022
l)1 5/ 5125 Q-
9J
EXP. DATE
F

OF CALO OF
2 SHEETS
06/24/2025
C3
21 of 31
0 O
N
VICINITY MAP FLAN71 NC-9 LEOEND WUGOLS

LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN
SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ZONE 5
Hacienda Drlve EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED
PROPERTY LINE If SEE EXISTING TREE INVENTORY L 1ST ON LEFT

EMERGENCY I
VEHICLE ACCESS EX 1ST ING CONCRETE DITCH
TREE WELL TREES - 24" BOX SIZE 0IIIIIIIIIIIIIEW7 -
ULMUS P. ' TRUE GREEN' GHINESE ELM M
ct
CV
LOT 15 s
PE. 362. 5
I MELR05E WAY STREET TREE - 24" BOX SIZE U
IQ PRIVATE YARD SLOPES OVER 5' HT. ULMUS P. ' TRUE GREEN' GHINESE ELM M 71 O
STORM DRAIN EASEMENT TO BE LANDSCAPED s W
PER G IV IL ENG INEER' 5
fl STREET TREE ( INTERNAL AND TOT LOT TREES) - 24" BOX SIZE C IPLAN LOT 14 Melrose Wa

GHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS GHITALPA L
O U
Q
PE. 363. 1 GEIJERA PARVIFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW L
PROPERTY LINE 3Q

LAURUS NOB L IS BAY LAUREL L
sly
North 5HRUB5 AND GROUNDCOVER
w
rI _ _ _ f FARK LOT- SEE NTS a)
ENLARGEMENT AT RIGHT SLOPE SHRUBS - 1- 5 GAL.
to
BAGGHARIS CENTENNIAL COYOTE BRUSH LLOT 13 I N
I ) PE. 364. 2 I f STORM DRAIN EASEMENT

CEANOTHUS CENTENNIAL CENTENNIAL CEANOTHUS L
PEOT
12 EXISTING TREE INVENTORY 516HTLINE AND PARKWAY SHRUBS - 1- 5 GAL. 0000 DIANELLA ' LITTE REV LITTLE REV. FLAX LILY L
NUMBER SPECIES CALIPER STATUS 5ENEC10 SERPENS BLUE CHALK STICKS L O PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT B 10- FILTRATION BA51 N VERBENA DE LA MINA DE LA MINA VERBENA L U 42" TUBULAR STEEL FENCE
1 EUCALYPTUS SPP. 9" TO BE REMOVED
WITH MAINTENANCE GATE 2 PYRUS SPP. 6" TO BE REMOVED 50REENING SHRUBS - 5 GAL. CV LEUGOPHYLLUM FRUTIC05A TEXAS SAGE L
3 SCHINUSTEREBINTHIFOLIUS 8" TO BE REMOVED ARBUTUS GOMPAGTA NO COMMON NAME L N 4 SCHINUSTEREBINTHIFOLIUS 24" TO BE REMOVED NE57RIN61A FRUTICOSA COAST ROSEMARY L EX 1ST ING 5'- 6 STUCCO
5 OLEA SPP. 18 TO BE REMOVED MASSING SHRUBS AND 6ROUNDGOVER5 - I- 5 GAL.

LOT 1 1

AALL TO REMAIN
6 SCHINUSTEREBINTHIFOLIUS 6" TO BE REMOVED
SALVIA SPP. SAGE L
z1
STRELITZIA R. JUNCEA' BIRD OF PARADISE LI 1 PE. 363. 0 Q1 7 CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 6" TO BE REMOVED BOUGAINVILLEA SPP. BOUGAINVILLEA L J
SCREENING SHRUBS GALL ISTEMON L 1TTLE JOHN LITTLE JOHN BOTTLEBRUSH L

AGAINST WALL
8 WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA 18" TO BE REMOVED
ALOE SPP. ALOE L
PROPOSED STREET LIGHT i
9 JACARANDA MIMOSIFOLIA 6" TO BE REMOVED AGAVE SPP. AGAVE L O 10

PROPERTY LINE MUHLENBER& IA RI& ENS DEER GRASS L
W

CONCRETE SIDEWALK
IrPLI3T63. 0 10 SCHINUSTEREBINTHIFOLIUS 6'' TO BE REMOVED UPARKWAY GROUNDGOVER ( FLATS @ 12" O. G. w
L_L — — — — — — DEL ALBA WHITE ICE PLANT L z
r— — — 4) GE IJERA PAR\/ IFLORA STREET STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ROSEMARI NUS SPP. ROSEMARY L O LOT 9 TREES ON EAST S 1DE OF STREET PER G IV IL ENGINEERS PLAN SLOPE GROUNDGOVER - ( FLATS a 12" O. G.) w U PE. 363. 5 BAGGHARIS ' PIGEON POINT' COYOTE BRUSH L
w W
1 I PROPOSED 6 TARN VINYL FENCE c
L=______ —____ B10- RETENTION BASIN - ( I GAL. @) I5" O. G.) VPARK LOT ENLARGEMENT TURF JUNCU5 PATENS CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH L

CARER TUMULIGOLA BERKELEY SEDGE L U)
LOT 8 Q

PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT I
I
PE. 363. 5 TURF- SOD z

HYBRID BERMUDA ( TI F GREEN) SOD H
T - - \ - - - - - - _ J
r
1 LOT 7 I Uj I PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
PE. 365. 0 I PER CIVIL ENGINEERS PLAN

L - - - - - --
PROPOSED 6 TAN r- — — — — — ——

V INYL YARD FENCE
I
I
Ical NOTES:

II PE. 365. 5 f 1. ALL SLOPES ( 4: 1 OR STEEPER) WILL BE PROVIDED W 1TH REINFORCED STRAW MATS ( SG Q L — — — — — — —
I W
1 150 MANUFACTURED BY NORTH AMERI CAN GREEN, I- 800- 4 3- Iq65, OR G ITY APPROVED Q U I—
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL r — — — — — — — 3 w

2. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS, INCLUDING SLOPES ( 4: 1 OR STEEPER) THAT ARE GRADED OR Q (nLOT 5 DISTURBED AS PART OF TH 1S PROJECT WILL BE PROVIDED WITH PERMANENT IRRIGATIONPROPERTY LINE I
PE. 365. 7. 0 O
3 TO MEET C 1TY REOU IREMENTS. U
L - - - - - - - w
LL5. NO OVERHEAD IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 24" OF ANY NON- PERMEABLE O W I SURFACE 0 O
I
i
LOT 4
d
I 1
PE. 366. 0 3
h

4. TREES ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN 10 OF ANY DRIVEWAY I--CD LL — — — — — — — — TURF 0 5' 10' 30' 5. PLANT MATERIALS OVER 50" HT. OR WITHOUT AN 8' MINIMUM CLEARANCE ARE U
I
F- — —— — — — —
I
PROHIBITED WITHIN STREET INTERSECTION SIGHT TRIANGLES.

I I
LQ>=

CONCRETE SEATING AREA W ITH A PICNIC
1 PE. 366. 5 TABLE AND BENCH AND SHADE TREES ALL SLOPES 4: 1 OR GREATER MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS. THIS APPLIES TO ALL SLOPES EVEN THOSE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS:

FIRE HYDRANT BIKE RACK N Ort h ScaleIe 1" = 10' A. ALL GRADED SLOPES MUST BE PERMANENTLY IRRI GATED WITH A CENTRALLY CONTROLLEDPER CIVIL ENGINEER' S PLAN SYSTEM WITH NO OVER SPRAY. DATE: 5/ 5 / 2022 1 LOT 2 STREET TREE ( TYP.) TO BE B. GROUND COVERS MUST BE PLANTED FROM LINERS OR FLATS AT 12" O. G. OR I GALLONS AT

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
1 PE. 367. 0 I LOCATED 5' BEHIND SIDEWALK, 151, O. G. DRAWN BY: LL PER G IV IL ENGINEER' S PLAN A ITH ROOT BARRIER C. PROVIDE I ONE GALLON SHRUB FOR EACH 100 SF OF SLOPE AND I FIVE GALLON SHRUB 144 D. PROVIDE TREES ON ALL SLOPES AT A RATE OF ONE 15 GALLON TREE PER 500 SF OF STREET TREE ( T) OOP.)
5' TUBULAR STEEL FILESLOPE ON ALL SLOPES 5' OR GREATER VERTICAL HEIGHT. ON ALL SLOPES 8' OR GREATER 3 r
LOT 1
I `
FENCE TO REMAIN VERTICAL HEIGHT, PROVIDE ON 15 GALLON TREE PER 500 SF OR SLOPE PLUS ONE 5 PE. 367. 5 GALLON TREE PER EACH I,0005F OF SLOPE. REVISIONS:

E. REINFORCED STRAW MATS ( SG 150 MANUFACTURED BY NORTH AMERIGAN GREEN I- 800- 415- 1q65 OR C 1TY APPROVED) MUST BE INSTALLED ON ALL SLOPES 5: 1 OR GREATER.

PROPOSED STREET L 1GHT

PER CIVIL ENGINEER' S PLAN
W—
1-----
s_
TOTAL PROJECT SITE: I am familiar with and agree to comply with the requirements for landscape 2) TREE WELLS- WITH ADA- ACCESSIBLE TREE _
W—
W
W
n^/ 2. 21 NET ACREAGE improvements as described in Chapter 18. 56 of the Vista Development GRATES. TREE GRATES WITH FRAME TO BE
E°
E—°
E—°
W
WI A w— W— W—
Code and the Landscape Manual. This plan has been prepared in E—

P P P P
NEENAH ENT. INC. 60" X a0" TREE GRATES:

E E—° E—
TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: compliance with those regulations. I certify that the plan implements the MODEL 5552 60" 5a. ADA COMPLIANT TREE 0. 21 ACRES regulations to provide efficient landscape water use.

GRATE WITH A 50" X 60" MODEL 5528
EXTENDED PANEL. AVAIL. AAA. GROUPNEI. COM
0 20 40 120
NDSC%
OF SITE LANDSCAPED: O
P F
12%
wPRp L C"
o\
y
SIGHT LINE- PLANT MATERIAL TO BE MAX. 24" HEIGHT. ANY Applicant Date TREE THAT FALLS A 1TH IN A S 1GHT LINE SHALL BE LIMBED
c
SIG A URE 1
AND MAINTAINED AT LEAST V ABOVE FIN 1SH GRADE North Scale 1 - 40, 5/ I/ 2022

THE SITE WILL HAVE A DEDICATED

POTABLE WATER METER FOR
5/ 31/ 2022
DATE
l 5/ 51/ 25 \
Landscape Architect Date EXP. DATE
HOMEOWNER' S ASSOCIATION IRRIGATION. F

OFCA F OF
SHEET
06/24/2025
C3
22 of 31
Exhibit A Proposed General Plan Amendment
Existing e
Neighborhood
Medium Medium High Commercial ( CN)
Low Density
Density Residential
Residential
Low Density
MHD) Parks and
MILD) RecreationRecreation N
LD) PR) o
Low
ensit Civic
R sident al Activity

LD) CA)
MelroseWy
Medium
Low DensityLow ;
Residential Low Density
DensiD, LD) Residential
Residential LD)
MILD;
Proposed
Medium Medium High
Neighborhood
Low Density
Commercial ( CN)
Density Residential
Residential MHD) Parks and
MILD) Low Density Recreation
Residential PR)
D
LD)
ediu
Low Civic
Densit
Activity
Bsideni ial CA)
M LD)
MelroseWy
Medium Low Density
Low Residential Low Density
Density LD) Residential
Residential LD)
MILD;
06/24/2025
C3
23 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
24 of 31
EXHIBIT 4
06/24/2025
C3
25 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
26 of 31
06/24/2025
C3
27 of 31
1 4
903-2912-5962, v. 1

CITY OF VISTA

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE
In 2022, California’s SB1439 extended requirements under Government Code Section 84308, also known as the "Levine Act", to prohibit City “Officers” from participating in any action related to a contract, license, permit, or entitlement if such Officer received campaign contributions totaling more than $250 within the previous twelve months, and for twelve months following the date of a final decision, from a party or participant to the proceeding, or their agent.

Section 84308(a)(4) of the Levine Act defines an "Officer" as follows: “Officer” means any elected or appointed officer of an agency, any alternate to an elected or appointed officer of an agency, and any candidate for elective office in an agency. The term “Officer” is further defined 2 Cal. Code Regs. Section 18438.1, which states:

An officer of an agency includes only those persons who make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a decision in the license, permit, or entitlement for use proceeding, or who exercise authority or budgetary control over the agency or officers who may do so, and:
(1) Serve in an elected position, including an official appointed to an elected position due to an interim vacancy or an election otherwise canceled because the official was the sole candidate for the position;
(2) Serve as a member of a board or commission;
(3) Serve as the chief executive of a state agency, or county, city or district of any kind; or
(4) Have decision making authority with respect to the proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use and is also a candidate for elected office or has been a candidate for elective office in the 12 months prior to the proceeding.

The party making this certification is responsible for determining whether a recipient of a political contribution is a City Officer prior to completing this form. A list of City elected officials and members of City boards and commissions can be obtained through the following links:
https://www.vista.gov/city-hall/elected-officials
https://www.vista.gov/city-hall/city-clerk/online-resources/boards-commissions I
f you have any questions regarding if a particular person is a City Officer and cannot obtain the information from the above links, please contact the City Clerk’s Office. 06/24/2025
C3
28 of 31
EXHIBIT 5
06/24/2025
C3
29 of 31
1 4
903-2912-5962, v. 1

CITY OF VISTA

Vista City CouncilJune 24, 2025

Vista City Council
June 24, 2025