bsd 2026 AR 06/09 cip 8396 sewer capacity improvements award of professional services contract

ACTION:
____________________________
Clerk/Secretary
Department: Engineering Item No: C5
Prepared by:

Jason Rivera, Capital Projects Manager
Erin Adams, Administrative Programs Manager Meeting Date: June 9, 2026 Approved by:

Greg Mayer, Director of Engineering
John Conley, City Manager Agenda Location: Consent Calendar SUBJECT: CIP 8396 – SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS AT SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78 –

AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
RECOMMENDATION:

1.Adopt Buena Sanitation District Board Resolution No. 2026- , approving a contract with Harris & Associates, Inc. for professional services for the Sewer Capacity Improvements at Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78 Project (CIP No. 8396).

2. Adopt Buena Sanitation District Board Resolution No. 2026- , amending the Capital Project Budget for Fiscal Years 2024/25 and 2025/26.

CORRELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS: Routine item not directly associated with a Council Goal.

PRIOR ACTION: On June 11, 2024, adopted District Board Resolution No. 2024-04, adopting a Capital Project Budget for Fiscal Years 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Vote: 5-0) STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT: The proposed sewer improvements along Sycamore Avenue beneath the SR-78 Freeway consist of four existing manholes connected by three segments of 15-inch pipe totaling approximately 667 feet. Capacity analysis indicates a potential for surcharge under existing peak wet- weather flow conditions; therefore, the existing 15-inch pipe will be upsized to 24-inches in accordance with the 2025 Sewer Master Plan to alleviate this issue. The project will require coordination with Caltrans since a large portion of the alignment is within their right of way.

On February 6, 2026, the District issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for professional services for the Sewer Capacity Improvements at Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78 projet on the District’s procurement website and online procurement portal, OpenGov. The District received three proposals on March 30, 2026, from the following firms:

Company Name Location
Carollo Engineers, Inc San Diego, CA
Harris & Associates San Diego, CA
Michael Baker International San Diego, CA
Staff reviewed and ranked the proposals based upon pre-determined criteria identified in the RFP, including project understanding, firm’s experience with similar projects, and knowledge of local wastewater collection system. Staff then reviewed the proposed fee of the top candidate and negotiated a fair and reasonable fee AGENDA
REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
Approved above recommendation, adopted the following: 1) Buena Sanitation District Resolution No. 2026-06. Vote: 5-0; 2) Buena Sanitation District Resolution No. 2026-07. Vote: 5-0

ACTION:
____________________________
Clerk/Secretary
Department: Engineering Item No: C5
Prepared by:

Jason Rivera, Capital Projects Manager
Erin Adams, Administrative Programs Manager Meeting Date: June 9, 2026 Approved by:

Greg Mayer, Director of Engineering
John Conley, City Manager Agenda Location: Consent Calendar SUBJECT: CIP 8396 – SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS AT SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78 –

AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
RECOMMENDATION:

2. Adopt Buena Sanitation District Board Resolution No. 2026- , amending the Capital Project Budget for Fiscal Years 2024/25 and 2025/26.

CORRELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS: Routine item not directly associated with a Council Goal.

CITY COUNCIL

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
06/09/2026 C5 1 of 422

MEETING DATE: June 9, 2026 PAGE 2

SUBJECT: CIP 8396 – SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS AT SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78 –

AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
for the proposed scope of work. Based on evaluation of the proposals, staff recommends the selection of Harris & Associates, Inc. to provide professional services for the Sewer Capacity Improvements at Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78.

FISCAL IMPACT: The contract for Harris & Associates, Inc. is $422,212. Approval of the staff recommendations will amend the Capital Project Budget by increasing existing funds in 5066515.578999.8396 by $165,000 to fully fund this contract from Buena Sanitation District Sewer Reserves.

EXHIBITS:

1. Buena Sanitation District Board Resolution 2026- , approving a contract with Harris & Associates, Inc. for professional services for the Sewer Capacity Improvements at Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78 Project (CIP No. 8396)

2. Buena Sanitation District Board Resolution No. 2026- , amending the Capital Project Budget for Fiscal Years 2024/25 and 2025/26

3. Contract with Harris & Associates, Inc.

06/09/2026 C5 2 of 422

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT, APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS AT SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78 PROJECT (CIP NO. 8396)
The Board of Directors of the Buena Sanitation District does resolve as follows:

1. Findings. The Board of Directors hereby finds and declares the following:

A. Pursuant to section 3.08.060B of the Vista Municipal Code, a request for proposals (RFP) was issued February 23, 2026.

B. Five proposals were submitted in response to the RFP and were evaluated based upon the predetermined set of criteria identified in the RFP.

C. Staff recommends the selection of Harris & Associates, Inc. as the consultant to provide professional services for the Sewer Capacity Improvements at Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78 Project (CIP No. 8396).

2. Action.

A. The contract between the Buena Sanitation District and Harris & Associates, Inc. for the Sewer Capacity Improvements at Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78 Project is approved, and the Chairperson is authorized to execute the contract.

3. Adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Buena Sanitation District held on June 9, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

WALTER CHUNG, DISTRICT COUNSEL
By:

APPROVED
Walter C. Chung
20260527150213
JOHN B. FRANKLIN, CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:

KATHY VALDEZ, CLERK OF THE BOARD
By:
06/09/2026 C5 3 of 422
EXHIBIT 1

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT, AMENDING THE CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2024/25 AND 2025/26
The Board of Directors of the Buena Sanitation District does resolve as follows:

1. Findings. The Board of Directors hereby finds and declares the following:

A.On June 11, 2024, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution 2024-04 approving the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program, the Capital Project Budget for Fiscal Years 2024/25 AND 2025/26, and authorizing appropriations for Fiscal Years 2024/25 and 2025/26 capital projects.

B.The Board of Directors desires to amend the Capital Project Budget at this time to reflect changed circumstances.

2. Action.

A.The Capital Project Budget for Fiscal Years 2024/25 and 2025/26 is amended as set forth in Exhibit A.

3. Adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Buena Sanitation District held on _____________________________, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

WALTER CHUNG, DISTRICT COUNSEL
By:

JOHN FRANKLIN, CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:

KATHY VALDEZ, CLERK OF THE BOARD
By:

APPROVED
Walter C. Chung
20251104153119
06/09/2026 C5 4 of 422
EXHIBIT 2

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 EXHIBIT A

1. Account Number Account Description Increase Decrease 5060000.310410 Fund Balance 165,000$
5066515.578999.8396 Source Appropriation 165,000$
Appropriations are hereby made to fund Sewer Capacity Improvements at Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78 (CIP No. 8396). 06/09/2026 C5 5 of 422

00034875 3
1 of 11
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FOR SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS (CIP 8396)
THIS “CONTRACT” is entered into by and between the “Parties” as of ___________________ (“Contract Date”).

1.0 THE “PARTIES”
The “District”:

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT, a county
sanitation district
200 Civic Center Drive
Vista, CA 92084
Working Contact: Jason Rivera
Billing Contact: Erin Adams
The “Contractor”
Harris & Associates, Inc., a California
corporation
1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500
Concord, CA 94520
Contact: Jason Caprio

2.0 BASIC TERMS

2.1 The “Services” to be performed by Contractor are set forth in (“Exhibit A”).

2.2 The “Required License” for the Services is: California Professional Engineer.

2.3 Contractor, an entity holding the Required License, desires to enter into this “Contract” with District for the Services.

2.4 The “Project” for which the Services are required is described in Exhibit A.

2.5 Contractor has submitted to District a Proposal to perform the Services dated March 30, 2026 (“Exhibit B”).

2.6 The “Contract Ceiling Price” is: $422,212.

2.7 This Contract requires the payment of prevailing wages. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Contract, the Contractor shall execute and deliver to District the Labor Law Compliance Form (Exhibit D).

3.0 CONTRACT TERM

3.1 This Contract shall take effect as of the Contract Date.

3.2 This Contract shall be in effect for 26 calendar months (“Term”) from the Contract Date. The Term may be extended at the District’s option for an additional 6 months, in increments of District’s choice, for a maximum Term of 32 from the Contract Date.

3.3 District may terminate this Contract upon 30-days’ written notice to Contractor. In such event, or upon request of District, Contractor shall assemble all District documents in the Contractor's possession, put them in order for proper filing and closing, and deliver the documents to District. In the event of termination, Contractor shall be paid for work performed to 06/09/2026 C5 6 of 422
EXHIBIT 3

00034875 3 2 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
the termination date. District shall make the final determination as to the portion of tasks completed and the compensation to be paid.

4.0 SCOPE
Contractor shall perform all Services including, but not limited to, the furnishing of all tools, equipment, materials, software, supplies, and manufactured articles, and for furnishing all transportation, services, including fuel, power and water, essential communications, and the performance of all labor, work or other operations, as may be required from time to time, in accordance with Exhibit A and Exhibit B. The Services shall be complete, and all work, material, and services not expressly called for in the Proposal which may be necessary for complete and proper construction to carry out the Contract in good faith, shall be performed, furnished, and installed by the Contractor at no increase in cost to District. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit A and Exhibit B, the provisions of Exhibit A shall control.

5.0 COMPENSATION

5.1 District shall pay Contractor on a time and material rate as set forth in Exhibit B for the Services to be performed.

5.2 An invoice for payment shall be submitted in a form satisfactory to District. At a minimum, the invoice shall include: the purchase order number, the work order number, a description of the work performed, and a total amount.

5.3 Changes in, additions to, or deductions from the Services, including increases or decreases in the quantity of any item or portion of the Services, shall be set forth in a written change order executed by District and by the Contractor which shall specify:

5.3.1 The changes, additions, and deductions to be made.

5.3.2 The increase or decrease in compensation due the Contractor, if any.

5.3.3 Adjustment in the time of completion, if any.

5.4 Contract Ceiling Price

5.4.1 In no event shall District be liable for paying more than the Contract Ceiling Price for Contractor's services rendered under this contract.

5.4.2 If it becomes foreseeable that Contractor will need to perform services such that the cumulative total of costs to District will exceed the maximum permitted by this Contract, any such cost overrun will be handled pursuant to the change order procedure in Chapter 3.08. District and Contractor recognize that District lacks authority to exceed the cost ceiling without the express authorization of the District Council. If the maximum cost to District for this Contract is exceeded unexpectedly, payment shall be made as mutually agreeable and disputes shall be handled pursuant to this Contract, but work shall cease as soon as is reasonably feasible once the cost ceiling plus allowable change orders, if any, is exceeded.
06/09/2026 C5 7 of 422

00034875 3 3 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

5.5 Except as provided in Exhibit B, Contractor shall not be reimbursed for any expenses incurred in rendering services under this Contract.

6.0 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The Contract comprises the following documents including all additions, deletions, modifications, and appendices and all addenda setting forth any modifications or interpretations of any these documents: Documents required under Exhibits A–E and the Standard Specifications (defined below).

7.0 TIME FOR COMPLETION AND COMMENCEMENT OF SERVICES
All Services under the Contract must be completed in compliance with the schedule in Exhibit A.

8.0 ASSISTANCE BY DISTRICT
All information, data, records, reports, and maps as are in possession of District and necessary for the carrying out of this work shall be available to Contractor without charge. District shall make available to Contractor members of its staff for consultation with Contractor in the performance of this Contract. District does not warrant that the information data, records, reports, and maps heretofore or to be provided to Contractor are complete or accurate and Contractor should satisfy itself as to accuracy and completeness. District and Contractor agree that District shall have no liability should any information, data, records reports, and maps be inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading. Unless provided in Exhibit A, no other assistance shall be provided by District to Contractor.

9.0 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE

9.1 Contractor represents and warrants that it has the training, qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Contract in a thorough, competent, and professional manner. At all times Contractor shall faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience, and talent, perform all services described herein. In meeting its obligations under this Contract, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those required of Contractor under this Contract.

9.2 Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the Term of this Contract. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the services set forth in this Contract, including any business licenses required by District. Neither District, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, or agents of District, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this Section.

10.0 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS

10.1 Except as otherwise provided, whenever reference is made to “Standard Specifications”, it shall mean:

06/09/2026 C5 8 of 422

00034875 3 4 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, most current edition and supplement, as last amended, with Regional Supplements, written and promulgated by Southern California Chapter, American Public Works Association, and Southern California District, Associated General Contractors of California, Joint Cooperative Committee (“Greenbook”) and the City of Vista Special Provisions to the Greenbook.

10.2 Except as otherwise provided, whenever reference is made to “Standard Plans”, it shall mean:

San Diego Area Regional Standard Drawings, and City of Vista Standard Drawings, latest edition, unless otherwise noted.

11.0 SUPPLEMENTARY DEFINITIONS
In addition to or in lieu of the terms and definitions specified in Section 1-2 of the Standard Specifications, wherever the following terms and definitions are used, the intent and meaning shall be as follows:

City: The Buena Sanitation District.

Board: The Board of the Buena Sanitation District.

Drawings or Plans: All drawings, plans, maps, profiles, and diagrams delineating the work on the Services.

12.0 CONTRACTOR’S STATUS; CONTRACTOR’S EMPLOYEES

12.1 Contractor shall perform the services provided for herein in Contractor's own way as an independent contractor and in pursuit of Contractor's independent calling. Contractor is not to be considered an employee of District, nor shall any employees of Contractor be considered employees of District, for any purpose. Contractor shall be under the direction and control of District staff only as to the results to be accomplished. This Contract is not intended to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture, or association between District and Contractor.

12.2 Contractor represents and warrants that all design professional services shall be provided by a person or persons duly licensed by the State of California to provide the type of services described in Exhibit A.

12.3 Neither Contractor, nor any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to District’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights.

12.4 Contractor is aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and shall comply with those requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all of Contractor’s officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors that are included in this Contract.

06/09/2026 C5 9 of 422

00034875 3 5 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

12.5 The payment made to Contractor pursuant to this Contract shall be the full and complete compensation to which Contractor and Contractor’s officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors are entitled for performance of any work under this contract. Neither Contractor nor Contractor’s officers or employees are entitled to any salary or wages, or retirement, health, leave or other fringe benefits applicable to employees of the District. District will not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of Contractor. District shall not be required to pay any workers' compensation insurance on behalf of Contractor.

12.6 Contractor agrees to defend and indemnify District for any obligation, claim, suit or demand for tax, retirement contribution including any contribution to the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), social security, salary or wages, overtime payment, or workers' compensation payment which District may be required to make on behalf of Contractor or any employee of Contractor, or any employee of Contractor construed to be an employee of District, for work done under this contract. This is a continuing obligation that survives the termination of this Contract.

13.0 CIVIL RIGHTS

13.1 Contractor agrees to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, the California Fair Employment Practices Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, any other applicable federal and state laws and regulations hereinafter enacted.

13.2 Contractor shall not knowingly deny an opportunity or benefit, discriminate against or harass, any employee or applicant for employment on account of the person’s race, color, ethnicity, national origin, ancestry, religion, creed, veteran status, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, age, or other status protected from workplace discrimination by state or federal law.

13.3 Contractor shall not knowingly give preferential treatment to any applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, national origin, ancestry, religion, creed, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation.

13.4 This section shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with the California and United States Constitutions and applicable state and federal statutes governing workplace discrimination. The terms used in this section shall have the same meaning as defined in state statutes governing the same subject matter.

13.5 Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting bona fide occupational qualifications consistent with applicable state and federal law and reasonably necessary to the normal operation of Contractor. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting regulations and policies to prevent nepotism or conflicts of interest.

13.6 Nothing in this Section shall be interpreted as prohibiting action taken to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal funds to District.

13.7 To the fullest extent permitted by law and without limitation by the other provisions of this Contract relating to indemnification and insurance, Contractor shall also indemnify, defend and hold harmless District, and its directors, officers, employees and agents from and against all liability (including without limitation all claims, damages, penalties, fines, and judgments, associated investigation and administrative expenses, and defense costs, 06/09/2026 C5 10 of 422

00034875 3 6 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, and costs of alternative dispute resolution) resulting from any claim of discrimination or harassment, including but not limited to sexual harassment, arising from the conduct of the Contractor or any of the Contractor’s officers, employees, agents, licensees, or subcontractors. In the event of a discrimination or harassment complaint against any employee, agent, licensee or subcontractors of Contractor or its subcontractors, Contractor shall take immediate and appropriate action in response to such complaint, including, but not limited to termination or appropriate discipline of any responsible employee, agent, licensee or subcontractors. The provisions of this Section survive completion of the services or termination of the Contract.

14.0 CONTROL OF SERVICES
Each Party shall appoint a representative who shall have the authority to represent and act for that Party (“Representative”). Any written or verbal directions or requests of District's Representative delivered to the Contractor’s Representative shall have the same force and effect as if delivered to the Contractor. The Contractor's Representative shall have the authority to sign any change order, coordinate the work of all subcontractors and make other decisions pertaining to the Contract.

15.0 ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONSULTING

15.1 Neither this Contract nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of the District. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty-five (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Contractor, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Contract shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Contractor or any surety of Contractor of any liability hereunder without the express consent of District.

15.2 Contractor shall be fully responsible to the District for any acts and omissions of Contractor's subcontractor, including persons either directly or indirectly employed by subcontractor, in the event Contractor subcontracts any of the work to be performed under this contract. Contractor's responsibility under this paragraph shall be identical to Contractor's liability for acts and omissions of Contractor and employees of the Contractor. Nothing contained in this Contract shall create any contractual relationship between District and any subcontractor of Contractor, but Contractor shall bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this contract applicable to Contractor's work, unless such change, omission, or addition is approved in advance in writing by the District Manager or the District Manager’s designee. All subcontractors are subject to the prior written review and approval of the District Manager or the District Manager’s designee.

16.0 LICENSES
If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of Contractor, its employees, agents, or subcontractors by federal, state, or local law, Contractor warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and that any required bond has been posted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.

06/09/2026 C5 11 of 422

00034875 3 7 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

17.0 FINANCIAL` RECORDS

17.1 Contractor shall maintain any and all documents, ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or records demonstrating or relating to Contractor’s performance of services pursuant to this Contract or evidencing or relating to expenditures and disbursements charged to District pursuant to this Contract. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Contract. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three years from the date of execution of this Contract and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. It is expressly understood and agreed that the provisions of this Section will survive termination of this Contract.

17.2 Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by District or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the District for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Contractor's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Contract or the primary location from which services are rendered, whichever is closer.

18.0 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Upon delivery, the work product, including without limitation, all original reports, writings, recordings, drawings, files, and detailed calculations developed under this contract are the property of District. Contractor agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this contract shall be vested in District and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual property rights in favor of District. District acknowledges that its use of the work product is limited to the purposes contemplated by the scope of Services and that Contractor makes no representation of the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the scope of Services.

19.0 CONFIDENTIALITY

19.1 Contractor shall treat all information obtained from District in the performance of this Contract as confidential and proprietary to District. Contractor shall treat all records and work product prepared or maintained by Contractor in the performance of this Contract as confidential.

19.2 Contractor agrees that it will not use any information obtained as a consequence of the performance of work for any purpose other than fulfillment of Contractor’s scope of Services. Contractor will not disclose any information prepared for District or obtained from District or obtained as a consequence of the performance of work to any person other than District, or its own employees, agents or subcontractors who have a need for the information for the performance of Services under this Contract unless such disclosure is specifically authorized in writing by District.

19.3 Contractor’s obligations under this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Contract.
06/09/2026 C5 12 of 422

00034875 3 8 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

20.0 CONFLICT OF INTEREST REQUIREMENT
Contractor agrees that, to the extent applicable, it shall comply with and be bound by all laws and regulations deriving from the relationship of the Contractor to the District, including the Political Reform Act (Government Codes Section 87100 et seq.) Chapters 2.32 or 2.33 of the Vista Municipal Code, the Community Redevelopment Act (Health & Safety Code 33000 et seq.) and all regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively “Conflict Laws”). As a condition precedent to the formation of this Contract, Contractor warrants and covenants that it is adequately informed regarding the obligations and duties imposed by the Conflict Laws and that to the best of Contractor's knowledge and belief, there exists no conflict of interest (under the laws) that would disqualify the Contractor from participation in any decisions arising out of the performance of this Contract. Prior to commencement of any work in the performance of this Contract, Contractor shall comply with any applicable requirements of Chapter 2.32 of the Vista Municipal Code, including any requirement to file a financial disclosure statement with the District Clerk. Contractor further agrees that no employee, agent, or subcontractor for Contractor shall perform any work for the District pursuant to this Contract which will violate the Conflict Laws.

21.0 PROHIBITION OF FINANCIAL INTEREST BY DISTRICT OFFICIAL Contractor warrants and covenants to District that no District Official has or will have any current or future financial interest in this Contract as of the date approved, nor shall Contractor promise, offer, or enter into any written, oral or implied Contract, to provide any financial interest or remuneration of any kind or manner to any District official with respect to this Contract. For purposes of this Section, the term “District Official” shall mean and include any elected or appointed officer of District, any employee of District, or any spouse or financial dependent of a District official or employee. A violation of this provision shall render this Contract null and void and Contractor shall be subject to restitution of all fees or money paid or earned under this Contract.

22.0 INDEMNIFICATION
Other than in the performance of Design Professional services, which shall be solely addressed as in Section 22.1 below, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold District and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers harmless against any and all liability, loss, damage, fine, penalty, expense, claim or cost (including without limitation costs and fees of litigation) of every nature (collectively, “Liability”) arising out of or in connection with Contractor’s performance under this Contract, including defects in design, except: (1) Liability caused by District's sole negligence or willful misconduct; or (2) for Liability caused by District's active negligence, in which case the indemnity received by District shall be reduced by the amount: (i) that District's active negligence contributed to the Liability on a comparative basis; or (ii) such other amount as may be required by law (“Duty of Indemnification”).

22.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, California Civil Code Section 2782.8), with respect to the performance of Design Professional services, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the District and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless against all claims, demands or liability that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor in the performance of Design Professional services under this Contract. In relation to Design Professional services, in 06/09/2026 C5 13 of 422

00034875 3 9 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
no event shall the cost to defend charged to Contractor exceed the Contractor’s proportionate percentage of fault.

The provisions of this Section are not limited by and do not affect the provisions of this contract relating to insurance.

23.0 INSURANCE AND BONDS
Contractor shall comply with the insurance provisions set forth in Exhibit C.

24.0 SERVICE OF NOTICE

24.1 Any notice, which either Party may desire to give to the other Party, must be in writing and may be given by personal delivery to the Party’s Representative or by overnight courier service to the Party’s address set forth in Section 1.0. Notice may also be given by mailing it by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the other Party at the address set forth in Section 1.0. Any notice given by mail will be deemed given 48 hours after such notice is deposited in the United States mail, addressed as provided with postage fully prepaid.

24.2 A Party may change its address by giving notice as provided above, and the changed address shall thereafter be deemed to be the address set forth in Section 1.0.

25.0 SPECIAL PROVISIONS
This Contract is subject to, and Contractor shall comply with, the special provisions referenced in Exhibit E, if any.

26.0 EXHIBITS
All documents referenced as exhibits in this Contract, or referenced in an exhibit to this Contract, are incorporated herein.

27.0 APPLICABLE LAW, VENUE
This Contract shall be construed and enforced under the laws of the State of California. If any action is commenced by any Party to this Contract, such action shall be filed in a court of competent jurisdiction within the County of San Diego, California.

00034875 3 10 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
set forth in Sections 1774–1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the District and the Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the District along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

No Contractor or sub-Contractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Contractor or sub-Contractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Contractors and sub-Contractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Contractor is further advised that any prevailing wage work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

29.0 COUNTERPARTS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES; ELECTRONIC DELIVERY This Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts, none of which need contain the signatures of both Parties, and each of which, when so executed, shall be deemed an original and all together shall constitute and be one of the same instrument. The Parties agree that this Agreement, whether executed by electronic signature, digital signature, or constituting a scanned or electronically reproduced copy or image of this Agreement bearing the signatures of the Parties, will be deemed an original and will represent competent evidence of the execution, terms and existence of this Agreement notwithstanding the failure or inability to produce an original executed Agreement or counterpart thereof, and without the requirement that the unavailability of such original executed Agreement or counterpart thereof first be proven.

Further, the exchange of this entire executed Agreement (and/or such exhibit(s) or document(s)) that is in photostatic or portable document format (.pdf) form by electronic mail or by another electronic means shall be considered original(s) and shall constitute effective execution and delivery of the original(s).

30.0 MODIFICATIONS
This Contract contains the entire agreement, between the Parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, discussions, obligations, and rights of the Parties in respect of each other regarding the subject matter of this Contract. There is no other written or oral understanding between the Parties. No modification, amendment or alteration of this Contract shall be valid unless it is in writing and signed by all Parties.

06/09/2026 C5 15 of 422

00034875 3 11 of 11 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

31.0 EXECUTION
IN WITNESS WHEREOF; the Parties hereto have executed this Contract as of the Contract Date.

“District”

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT, a county
sanitation district

By:

JOHN B. FRANKLIN, CHAIRPERSON

ATTEST:

KATHY VALDEZ, CLERK OF THE BOARD

By:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

WALTER CHUNG, DISTRICT COUNSEL

By:

RISK MANAGEMENT REVIEW:

ANALISA HOLBROOK, RISK MANAGER

By:

APPROVED
Amanda L. Guy
20260511163258

“Contractor”

HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC., a
California corporation

By:

Name/Title

By:

Name/Title

06/09/2026 C5 16 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

06/09/2026 C5 17 of 422

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ),
FOR

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES

SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
CIP 8396 – SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78
Addendum No. 1
March 20, 2026

All Contractual Requirements as defined within the Contract Documents shall remain in full force to the extent that they are not modified or in conflict with the attached addendum.

This addendum lists the nine (9) questions that were received and the answers that were provided in the Question & Answer Section of the RFP in the OpenGov website. At the bottom, please sign and date acknowledging that the questions/answers have been received and reviewed.

A. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q1 (OpenGov-Question 1) Potholing
SoCal Marketing Feb 19 2026 at 4:29 PM
Carollo Engineers
For potholing efforts, does the City want consultants to price a specific number of locations in order to have an 'apples to apples' comparison between firms? Or does the City prefer that each consultant identify the number of potholes they feel will be required?
A1 (OpenGov-question 1)
Each consultant should provide their expert opinion on the number of potholes necessary as part of their predesign methodology. Provide unit price. If the consultant is selected the pothole item will be evaluated and negotiated.

Q2 (OpenGov-question 2) Potholing
SoCal Marketing Feb 19 2026 at 4:30 PM
Carollo Engineers
For potholing, can we assume the road repair will be per City of Vista Std drawing SRF08-A/B?
A2 (OpenGov-question 2)
Correct

06/09/2026 C5 18 of 422

Q3 (OpenGov-question 3) Task 6
SoCal Marketing Feb 19 2026 at 4:31 PM
Carollo Engineers
For Task 6 - Construction Administration, does the City want consultants to price a specific number of RFI responses to provide an 'apple to apples' comparison? Or does the City prefer to have the consultant identify the number of RFI responses they believe will be required?
A3 (OpenGov-question 3)
Each consultant should provide their opinion on the number of RFI's based on their construction administration experience for a similar project. Provide unit price. If the consultant is selected the RFI response item will be evaluated and negotiated.

Q4 (OpenGov-Question 4) No Subject
SoCal Marketing Feb 19 2026 at 4:33 PM
Carollo Engineers
Section VII.B.4.c (p.12) states "A fee table will not be required at this time. Consultants selected for interview will be asked to provide a final fee table at the interview." However, Section VIII (p.14) states a Fee Schedule is required but "will remain unopened during submittal and evaluation process." Which is correct? A4 (OpenGov-Question 4)
Section VIII (p.14) is correct. Fee schedule is required but " will remain unopened during the submittal and evaluation process..."

Q5 (OpenGov-Question 5) Appendix
SoCal Marketing Feb 19 2026 at 4:34 PM
Carollo Engineers
Could we provide the detailed Scope of Services outside of the 25-page limit and include it in the appendix?
A5 (OpenGov-Question 5)
Please provide the detailed Scope of Services within the body of the proposal. The City/District receives many proposals therefore the 25-page limitation is manageable for City/District evaluations. It's a lot of information to sort through in a short time period.

06/09/2026 C5 19 of 422

Q6 (OpenGov-Question 6) 30% Plans
SoCal Marketing Mar 3 2026 at 11:44 AM
Carollo Engineers
Should the 30% plans be submitted with the PDR, or will they be a separate submittal? A6 (OpenGov-Question 6)
Separate submittal

Q7 (OpenGov-Question 7) Project Management and/or Adminstration SoCal Marketing Mar 3 2026 at 11:46 AM
Carollo Engineers
The listed scope of services does not include a task for Project Management and/or Administration. Can proposers add this task or does the City prefer these efforts are included in the listed tasks?
A7 (OpenGov-Question 7)
Per Section VII Proposal B-4 Detailed Scope of Services. "Provide a detailed scope of work containing any additional services or tasks the Consultant sees as necessary for the successful completion of the project. The scope of work shall include any information required to further clarify the scope of work included in the RFP."

Q8 (OpenGov-Question 8) Basis of Design and PDR
SoCal Marketing Mar 3 2026 at 11:47 AM
Carollo Engineers
Does the City intent for the Basis of Design Memorandum and the Preliminary Design Report to be separate documents?
A8 (OpenGov-Question 8)
Yes, two separate documents

06/09/2026 C5 20 of 422

Q9 (OpenGov-Question 9) Final Design Task
SoCal Marketing Mar 3 2026 at 11:47 AM
Carollo Engineers
In the Final Design task, the Final Submittal subtask states: "Consultant shall obtain the required signatures from reviewers on the original mylars." Are mylars required for the project, they are not mentioned in the subsequent list of deliverables.

A9 (OpenGov-Question 9)
Mylars will not be required. A signed paper copy is adequate with signatures will be scanned and uploaded.

Prospective Bidders shall acknowledge their receipt of this Addendum No. 1 and its incorporation into the bid submitted by executing this document in the designated space below and submitting this document with their bid:

I hereby acknowledge that I have received Addendum No. 1 and its provisions have been incorporated into the attached bid proposal.

_______________________________________________________________________ By

____________________________________ ________________________ Company Date

END OF ADDENDUM NO. 1

06/09/2026 C5 21 of 422

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES

FOR

SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS

CIP 8396 – SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78

Issue Date: February 6, 2026

Submittal Deadline: March 30, 2026, at 2:00PM

06/09/2026 C5 22 of 422

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CIP 8396 – SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78

I. INTRODUCTION

The Buena Sanitation District (BSD) is soliciting proposals from qualified professional engineering firms (Consultant) to provide design surveying, geotechnical investigation, engineering design, permitting, and a complete set of design drawings, specifications, and cost estimates for a sewer capacity improvement project in the City of Vista. CIP 8396 is to upsize an approximately 667’ long sewer located on Sycamore Ave crossing under CA SR-78 from the beginning of the northbound lane left turn pocket onto University Drive south to the intersection of Sycamore Ave and the eastbound CA SR- 78 on/off ramps.

This RFP includes a description of the proposal requirements, criteria for selection, and the scope of services to be provided by the Consultant.

All interested firms must have sufficient, readily available resources in the form of trained personnel, support services, specialized subconsultants, and financial resources to carry out the work without delay or shortcomings.

All Consultants must create an account on the City/Buena’s Electronic Bidding System, OpenGov Procurement to submit a proposal. Consultants can register using the ‘Sign Up’ link at the top of the page at:

https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityofvista

Once registered, Consultants must download this solicitation in order to appear on the Bidder’s List as a “Prospective Bidder.” Consultants that fail to specifically download this solicitation will not appear on the Bidders’ List and will be unable to participate or be considered for this RFP. See further instructions related to OpenGov Procurement under Section VIII (Proposal), below.

The Consultant and all subconsultants shall have a City of Vista Business License prior to award of contract. Business licenses can be obtained at www.vistabl.com . A City of Vista Business License is not required to propose on this request for proposals.

06/09/2026 C5 23 of 422

II. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The City of Vista owns and operates over 215 miles of sewer collection pipelines and one small capacity pump station, the Raceway Pump Station. The City of Vista and the City of Carlsbad jointly own and operate two additional large capacity pump stations (Agua Hedionda and Buena Vista Pump Stations) and associated pipelines. The Buena Sanitation District, which is an entity of the City, owns and operates 101 miles of sewer collection pipelines and one large capacity pump station. The City and District have interagency flow agreements with the City of Carlsbad, the City of Oceanside, the City of San Marcos, and the Vallecitos Water City.

In May 2025, the City of Vista and Buena Sanitation District adopted a Sewer Master Plan (SMP) update prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. The SMP update includes hydraulic modelling results of the entire collection system and identified pipe segments with capacity deficiencies in both the existing peak wet weather and build-out peak wet weather conditions, including the area which is the subject of this Request for Proposals.

Project CIP 8396 –The proposed sewer improvements along Sycamore Avenue beneath the SR-78 Freeway consist of four existing manholes connected by three segments of 15-inch VCP totaling approximately 667 feet. Capacity analysis indicates a potential for surcharge under existing peak wet-weather flow conditions therefore the existing 15-inch VCP will be upsized to 24-inches in accordance with the 2025 Sewer Master Plan to alleviate the issue.

Given the presence of complex legacy utilities, high sewer flows, the depth of the existing sewer (approximately 10–13 feet), proximity to bridge supports, and the complexity of constructing beneath a major freeway crossing—including bypass requirements—it is anticipated that multiple alternatives will need to be evaluated for both functionality and constructability prior to design. Additionally, since a majority of the improvements are with Caltrans Right of Way, the design consultant will be required to coordinate and acquire all Caltrans permits. The project is near the City of Vista/San Diego County boundary within Caltrans right of way therefore there is potential for coordination and permits with the County.

Attachment “A” contains a vicinity map of CIP 8396 and identifies the sewer infrastructure in question.

06/09/2026 C5 24 of 422

III. PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services includes preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR), final plans, specifications and engineering estimate (PS&E) package, bid support, construction support, and record drawings. The design will include the following elements:

1. Evaluate provided flows and properly size and slope the proposed sewer mains. Evaluate hydraulic capacity of adjacent sewer mains and recommend additional improvements if necessary.

2. Review Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) of existing sewer segments requiring upsize to identify existing connections and any deficiencies that may exist.

3. Verify existing utilities including requesting utility records from utility owners, utility plotting and preparing an additional utility investigation/pothole recommendation plan. Utility owners include but not limited to Vista Irrigation District (VID), San Deigo Gas & Electric (SDGE), Cox, AT&T, City of Vista (COV) streetlights, COV landscape irrigation, San Diego County and Caltrans. All consultants and subconsultants shall obtain all required encroachment permit and traffic control implementation as necessary to perform this work.

4. Provide geotechnical exploration and potholing along the proposed alignment and other areas of significant improvement to characterize subsurface conditions, including soil classification, groundwater presence, and asphalt concrete (AC) core sampling, as required. All consultants and subconsultants shall obtain all required encroachment permit and traffic control implementation necessary to perform this work.

5. Geotechnical investigation and report as necessary to adequately characterize soil characteristics along trench alignment, design shoring, and pavement design. Prepare a geotechnical report with findings and design recommendations. Required license for the Geotechnical Report is a California Geotechnical Engineer.

6. Evaluate the project alignment and modify the alignment as necessary to reduce construction costs while providing clearance from existing utilities, adequate access, protect existing bridge infrastructure and reduced impacts to traffic, environmentally sensitive areas, and the community during construction.

7. Provide and submit plans as needed to all affected utilities and stakeholders for conflict check, revise and resubmit as necessary to mitigate and/or resolve any issues. Meet and coordinate with various utilities to resolve conflicts.

Provide updates, correspondence, progress and documentation to Buena Sanitation District.
06/09/2026 C5 25 of 422

8. Provide all external agency permitting including but not limited to a Caltrans encroachment permit for the proposed freeway crossing.

9. Provide engineering support for preparation of environmental permit applications, and the appropriate CEQA document including:
a. Detailed project description including history of existing pipeline, total length of pipeline to be replaced, construction methodology (i.e. open trench vs. trenchless vs. conventional cut and cover in parallel, etc.). b. Site plan depicting pipeline alignment, construction disturbance area (both temporary and permanent), and staging areas.
c. Construction schedule (start and end dates, and construction phases and duration of each phase - if applicable).
d. Other construction details (maximum feet of pipeline to be installed per day; maximum trench width/depth; total cubic yards of soil to be excavated; cubic yards of soil to be exported vs. reused on-site to backfill trench areas; total acreage to be graded; estimated number of daily worker vehicle trips; maximum number of daily heavy truck trips (both directions); duration of sewer bypass pumping, existing bridge protection.
e. List of anticipated construction equipment and horsepower.

10. Prepare an erosion control plan for the project footprint consistent with City of Vista and state guidelines. Complete City of Vista Stormwater Checklist.

11. Identify and provide services required to prepare a PDR and final design including plans, specifications, and cost estimate suitable for competitive bidding.

Task 1 – Preliminary Design Report (PDR)

A. The Consultant shall review available documents to build upon for the development of the design.

B. Preliminary Studies. The Consultant shall conduct and evaluate additional studies as required to complete the design. These studies may include:

a. Additional utility research
b. Encroachment permits – Work in the City of Vista right-of-way will require a no- fee encroachment permit from the City to include any associated traffic control plans and traffic control implementation. Work within Caltrans right-of-way will require an encroachment permit, traffic control plans and traffic control implementation. See Applications & Forms | Caltrans .
c. Utility potholing and geotechnical exploration
d. Additional physical surveys
e. CCTV of existing sewer
f. Geotechnical investigations; and
06/09/2026 C5 26 of 422

g. Groundwater investigations.
h. Existing SR-78 bridge research and evaluation.
i. Evaluation of alternative technologies and methods.

C. Predesign Meetings. The Consultant shall plan and conduct two (2) meetings in the predesign phase. The consultant shall prepare the agenda and minutes for each meeting. In addition, there can also be informal interim meetings as needed to discuss progress and issues with the District. Meetings can be conducted online via Teams.

Meeting #1 – Kick Off Meeting: Plan and conduct a Kickoff Meeting outlining project goal, identifying points of contact, identifying project deliverables and schedule and strategizing a successful approach to the project.

Meeting #2 – PDR Meeting: Consultant shall conduct a meeting to discuss and present the results of the preliminary design efforts. A draft Basis of Design Memorandum and PDR should be submitted at least five (5) days prior to and discussed at this meeting.

D. Basis of Design (BOD) Memorandum. The Consultant shall prepare a technical memorandum identifying the detailed approach of the design including hydraulic calculations for pipeline sizing and discussion of velocity and depth to diameter ratio for various flow rates. Include references to preliminary studies completed by the Consultant. Identify the anticipated alignment, approach to environmentally sensitive habitat avoidance, approach to trenchless sewer installation, community impacts and any other relevant technical issues. A draft shall be submitted at least five (5) days before the PDR Presentation meeting.

The draft and final PDR with the BOD shall be delivered as an electronic PDF and Microsoft Word format copy for the projects.

Task 2 – 30% Design

A. 30% Horizontal Alignment Drawings. The Consultant shall prepare a horizontal alignment plan including, delineation of environmentally sensitive areas, existing easements, existing utilities, proposed manhole locations and trenchless pit locations with footprint based on updated physical survey and utility plotting.

B. 30% Interim meetings. There can also be a few informal interim meetings as needed to discuss progress and issues with the District. Meetings can be conducted online via Teams.

06/09/2026 C5 27 of 422

C. 30% Review Meeting. The Consultant shall attend one (1) review meeting following the submission of the 30% design. The Consultant shall provide an agenda and minutes of the meeting. Meetings can be conducted online via Teams.

The 30% design submittal shall include one electronic PDF copy of the project plans.

Task 3 – 60% Design

A. 60% Vertical Alignment Drawings. The Consultant shall prepare a vertical alignment plan including, depth, sensitive areas, existing easements, existing utilities, proposed manhole locations, details, trenchless pit locations with footprint based on updated physical survey and utility plotting, and proposed easements. The 60% shall incorporate comments from the District during the 30% design phase.

B. 60% Interim Meetings. There can also be a few informal interim meetings as needed to discuss progress and issues with the District. Meetings can be conducted online via Teams. Consultant shall address key design issues, summarize project progress, proposed easements, coordination issues, environmental constraints, and discuss a bidding strategy.

C. 60% Review Meeting. The Consultant shall attend one (1) review meeting following the submission of the 60% design. The Consultant shall provide an agenda and minutes of the meeting.

The 60% design submittal shall include one electronic PDF copy of the project plans and an AutoCAD file of the proposed alignment with all existing and required easements delineated.

Task 4 – 90% Design

A. 90% Design Drawings. The Consultant shall prepare 90% complete design drawings, including all design calculations.

B. 90% Specifications. The Consultant shall prepare 90% complete specifications based on the specifications provided. They shall include “Supplementary General Provisions”, “Supplementary Technical Provisions”, “Bid Schedule”, and “Description of Bid Items” to supplement the GREENBOOK. CSI format is acceptable where applicable.

Identify special Appendices that may be included.

C. 90% Construction Cost Estimate. The Consultant shall prepare a construction cost estimate for the project work.

06/09/2026 C5 28 of 422

D. 90% Review Meeting. The Consultant shall attend one (1) review meeting following the submission of the 90% design. The Consultant shall provide an agenda and minutes of the meeting.

The 90% design submittal shall include one electronic PDF copy of the project plans, specifications, and cost estimate, and an AutoCAD file of the proposed plans.

Task 4 – Final Design

A. Draft Final Submittal. A draft submittal shall include completely finished, full size, black line, signed prints, and PDF copy of same for the project. The specifications shall be completely finished, including “boiler plate” materials using District’s most current template, and delivered as a completed PDF with appendices. The Consultant’s estimate of probable construction cost shall be included. The final calculation package shall be included. Any other work products from the Consultant should be included in the submittal including final CAD plans.

The draft final design submittal shall include PDF, Word, and CAD copy of materials.

B. Review Meeting. The Consultant shall attend one (1) review meeting following the submission of the Draft Final Submittal to the District.

C. Final Submittal. Following the review meeting, the Consultant shall make any corrections identified by the District or other reviewing agencies. Consultant shall obtain the required signatures from reviewers on the original mylars.

The final submittal of the signed drawings and specifications shall be provided in PDF and in CAD format and specifications in PDF and Microsoft Word electronic format.

Task 5 – Bid Support

A. Pre-Bid Meeting (Optional). If the District decides to hold a Pre-bid meeting. The Consultant may attend the Pre-Bid Meeting and respond to technical questions from bidders about the project.

The Consultant shall also respond to other technical questions from bidders during the bidding process to be included in the addenda or issued as clarifications to bidders.

B. Prepare Addenda. The Consultant shall prepare up to two (2) addenda.

C. Prepare Conformed Set. Consultant shall prepare a conformed set of plans specifications taking into account the addenda prepared for the project. Consultant 06/09/2026 C5 29 of 422

shall provide five (5) sets of full size plans, five (5) sets of half-size plans, five (5) specifications, and PDFs of plans and specifications.

Task 6 – Construction Administration

A. Pre-Construction Meeting. The Consultant shall attend the Pre-Construction Meeting and answer any technical questions from the Contractor. The Consultant shall prepare meeting minutes for the design elements of the Pre-Construction Meeting.

B. Respond to Requests for Information (RFI). The Consultant shall answer RFIs from the Contractor within seven (7) calendar days during the construction period.

C. Submittal Review. The Consultant shall review up to ten (10) technical submittals related to their design. The Consultant shall respond to all submittals within seven (7) calendar days.

D. Progress Meetings. The Consultant shall attend up to four (4) progress meetings during construction as identified by the District.

E. Change Order Assistance. The Consultant shall review change orders and change order requests as it pertains to the Consultant’s technical design.

F. Record Drawings. The Consultant shall prepare record drawings from redline markups made during construction by the construction contractor for the project.

Consultant shall submit record drawings electronically (native format and PDF).

IV. DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES

The District will be responsible for the following:

1. Furnish Data: Furnish all reasonably available records and information, including reports, as-built plans, photos, correspondence, etc.

2. Staff Support: Provide staff support and time as required and agreed to in advance of the study.

3. Process and respond to requests to the District.

4. Provide contact information for both internal staff and external stakeholders if applicable.

5. Review submittals from the Consultant in a timely manner.

06/09/2026 C5 30 of 422

V. COORDINATION

Coordination with the District, City, other Consultants, Caltrans, County, Utilities, property owners, and other involved stakeholders may be required.

The District will decide the manner in which the project coordination is undertaken. At the District’s option, coordination efforts may be performed by the Consultant’s direct contact, by the Consultant acting though the District or by the District only. When coordination efforts require agreement, such agreement shall be coordinated through the District.

VI. PROJECT PROGRESS

The Contract shall begin upon approval by the District, and the Consultant shall commence work after notification to proceed by the District.

The Consultant is advised that any recommendation for contract award is not binding on the District until the Agreement is fully executed and approved by the District.

Progress Review Meetings shall be held at intervals deemed appropriate by the District at or before each of these meetings, the Consultant shall furnish two (2) copies of all completed or partially completed work products which have been developed or altered since the last Progress Review Meeting.

Progress Reports shall be submitted at regular intervals agreed upon mutually, indicating progress achieved during the reporting period in relation to the progress scheduled. The Consultant shall provide the District with the Progress Report at least four (4) working days before the Progress Meeting.

VII. PROPOSAL

A. Schedule. The District’s schedule for the selection process is as follows:

1. District Releases RFP February 6, 2026

2. Deadline for questions March 12, 2026 at 2:00 PM

3. Proposals Due March 30, 2026 at 2:00 PM

4. Notice of Consultant Shortlist April 6, 2026

5. Consultant Interview April 13-14, 2026

6. Notice of Consultant Selection April 16, 2026

7. Complete Negotiation of Agreement April 24, 2026

8. Council Award May 26, 2026

06/09/2026 C5 31 of 422

A Notice to Proceed for this project is tentatively scheduled to be issued in June 2026.

Upon issuance of Notice to Proceed, the Consultant shall submit a detailed schedule for the project including milestones and progress reports.

All dates are subject to change, and the District reserves the right to extend the date by which proposals are due.

All questions must be submitted via “Q&A” through the District’s Electronic Bidding System, OpenGov Procurement. Phone call questions will not be accepted. Answers to all submitted questions will be provided in an addendum through OpenGov Procurement.

To receive addenda and submit a proposal, Consultants shall register on the District’s Electronic Bidding System at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityofvista . Once registered, Consultants must download the RFP while logged in under their own name and identification number to appear on the Electronic Prospective Bidders List as a “Prospective Bidder.” Consultants that fail to download the RFP will not appear on the Electronic Prospective Bidders List and their proposals will be considered non- responsive. If a Consultant is unable to register or download the RFP from OpenGov Procurement, a Consultant representative may contact OpenGov Procurement to troubleshoot the problem.

All proposal documents and supplementary documents must be uploaded using OpenGov Procurement prior to event date and time as instructed in this solicitation.

Once file(s) have been uploaded and the Submission Status shows as “Submitted” the submission is complete. At that point respondents will receive an email confirmation from OpenGov Procurement.

OpenGov Procurement will determine the official time for the advertised proposal due date and such determination will be final. Any proposals not received in a timely manner on the Proposal Due Date, as described above, will not be considered.

B. Requirements.

In order to maintain uniformity with all proposals furnished by the Consultants, the District requests that the proposals be limited to a maximum of twenty five (25) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages (excluding cover letter, front and back covers, section dividers and resumes). 11” x 17” single-sided foldouts may be used for graphics only and will count as one page. Proposals shall include the following elements:

1. COVER LETTER – A cover letter shall summarize key elements and guarantee that key personnel will be committed to perform the required tasks throughout the 06/09/2026 C5 32 of 422

duration of the contract. The cover letter shall be limited to two (2) pages and shall include a contact name, email, phone number and full address for the Consultant. The cover letter shall include a statement that the Consultant can meet the District’s insurance requirements and is prepared to execute the Professional Services Master Agreement as written, and will not make any changes to the project team without authorization of the District. In cases, where a team member voluntary leaves a firm, the Consultant shall provide the District a proposal for a substitute team member subject to the approval of the District.

2. COMPANY INFORMATION
a. Identification of Responder;
b. Legal name and address of the company (partnership, corporation, joint venture, etc.);
c. Identification of the parent company (if applicable); d. Addresses of offices located in San Diego County;
e. Number of employees in San Diego County;
f. Name, title, address and telephone number of person to contact concerning the proposal.

3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH – Discuss the Consultant’s understanding of the project, and any suggestions or special concerns that the District and the Consultant should address for a successful project. Provide a narrative rendition of the technical and management approach proposed for this project. Show how all required tasks are to be completed.

4. DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES
a. Provide a detailed scope of work containing any additional services or tasks the Consultant sees as necessary for the successful completion of the project. The scope of work shall include any information required to further clarify the scope of work included in the RFP. The scope of work shall reflect the schedule and fee estimate included in this section. b. Provide a detailed project schedule, including stages of work, time frames, and ability to perform the required services in a timely manner. c. Provide a detailed breakdown of the number of hours for each staff classification (including both professional and administrative classifications) as they relate to each task identified in the Scope of Work.

A fee table will not be required at this time. Consultants selected for interview will be asked provide a final fee table at the interview.

5. PROJECT TEAM AND ORGANIZATION CHART
a. Describe project organization, including identification and responsibilities of key personnel.
b. Indicate roles of prime and all sub-consultants.
06/09/2026 C5 33 of 422

c. Provide a discussion of the experience of the Project Manager and other key staff members that would be involved with this project. d. Provide resumes of the Project Manager, Project Engineer, and other key staff members who will work on this project. The resume shall include relevant experience, education, licenses, and certifications. The resume for each individual shall not exceed one (1) page in length. Resumes shall be included as an appendix to the main document.
e. Describe proposed line-of-communication between the District, prime team members, and sub-consultants.

6. EXPERIENCE
a. Provide a brief description of consultant's experience in completing similar projects within the last 5 years.
b. Provide a detailed discussion of specialized experience in completing scope of required services listed above.
c. Provide three (3) similar projects which your firm has completed within the last 5 years. Projects currently being performed may be submitted for consideration. Project information should include a brief project description, agency or client name, their telephone number(s), the year of project completion, and the project construction cost.
d. Identify team members proposed for this project and their roles on the representative similar projects.

7. REFERENCES – The Consultant shall provide a minimum of three (3) references for similar projects for the prime firm. At least one reference shall be from the projects listed in Item 6.c of EXPERIENCE. At a minimum, each reference shall include the client’s name and location, number of projects completed for the client, client contact name and phone number.

8. STANDARD HOURLY BILL RATES – The Consultant’s Standard Hourly Billing Rates for all classifications of staff likely to be involved in the project shall be included along with the mark-up rate for any non-labor expenses and sub- consultants.

9. EXCEPTIONS TO RFP – Provide a statement that the Consultant has read, understands, and takes no exception to the RFP or the terms of the District’s Standard Consulting Agreement, attached as ATTACHMENT “B”. If the Consultant does take exception(s) to any portion of the RFP, the specific portion to which exception is taken shall be identified and explained.

10. ADDENDA TO THE RFP – Provide a statement that the Consultant has received all addenda, and include the addendum numbers and dates.

06/09/2026 C5 34 of 422

11. All copies shall be signed by an individual or, if a corporation, a corporation officer with the power to bind the company or corporation to its proposal. To be considered, all proposals shall be completely responsive to this RFP.

VIII. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION

The District's consultant evaluation and selection process is based on Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for professional services. An evaluation committee appointed by the District Engineer will review the proposals. The criteria and weight for evaluating the proposals submitted will be as follows:

1. Project Understanding: Demonstrated understanding of the project requirements, degree of creativity and innovation demonstrated with respect to the project approach and scope of work, and reasonableness of the schedule for the work and how the time has been allocated to specific tasks (30 points)

2. Responsiveness to Client’s Needs: Familiarity with District, Caltrans District 11, City of Vista, San Diego County, State, and federal requirements and procedures; and thoroughness and completeness of proposal in response to RFP (20 points)

3. Firm’s Experience with Similar Projects: Technical experience of project team in performing work of a closely related nature, experience working with public agencies, record of completing work on schedule and within budget. (15 points)

4. Staff and Project Experience: Qualifications of project team staff members, key personnel’s level of involvement in performing related work, logic of project organization, and adequacy of labor commitment. (15 points)

5. Knowledge of Local Wastewater Collection System: Familiarity of City of Vista/Buena Sanitation District wastewater collection system. (10 points)

6. Quality of Work Product: Demonstrated technical ability based on relevance and quality of sample work product (10 points)

Fee Schedule (separate electronic file uploaded to OpenGov Procurement). The Consultant fees schedules will remain unopened during submittal and evaluation process within the OpenGov site. The fee schedule of the top ranked Consultant will be opened at the conclusion of the consultant evaluation and selection process. Fees will not be used to determine the ranking of the consultants. The District may interview a short list of top ranked qualified consultants or proceed directly to negotiating the final fee schedule with the top ranked consultant. The ultimate consultant selection will be based upon both technical merit and value to the District.

The contract award, if any, will go to the Consultant whose proposal best serves the interests of the District, as it determines in its sole discretion according to the evaluation criteria described above.
06/09/2026 C5 35 of 422

The individual or composite ratings and evaluation forms prepared by District’s evaluators will not be revealed.

IX. REQUIREMENTS FOR PROVIDING SERVICES

The selected Consultant shall be expected to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, and contract provisions. The selected consultant will be expected to perform the work as described in this RFP.

Consultant shall carry out the instructions received from the District and shall cooperate with the District and other involved agencies.

The Consultant will be required to assume responsibility for all services offered in their proposals. The selected consultant will be the sole point of contact with regard to contractual matters, including payment of any and all charges resulting from contracts.

The Consultant shall have a Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QA/QC) plan in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the Agreement. The QC/QA plan shall establish a process whereby plans and other work products are independently checked, corrected, and back checked, and all job-related correspondence and memoranda are dated and then bound in appropriate job files.

Consultant is responsible for researching available records, determining their usefulness on this project, and paying any charges for copies of records.

All exhibits, studies, reports, plans, specifications, estimates, calculations, and other documents shall be prepared in accordance with the scope of work. Plans and exhibits shall be computer drafted in AutoCAD, ArcView or other compatible software and delivered to the Buena Sanitation District at project completion on electronic media in a format readable by the District, along with .pdf files for archival purposes.

The exhibits, studies, reports, plans, specifications, estimates, calculations, and other documents furnished under the Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to the District.

All work products shall be of neat appearance, well organized, technically and grammatically correct, internally consistent, thoroughly reviewed and checked, dated, designated with an accurate “percent complete” number, and having the maker and checker identified. The minimum standard of appearance, organization and content of the drawings and other work products shall be that of similar types provided by the Consultant in its Proposal as Sample Work Products and as set forth in related City of Vista/Buena Sanitation District standards and guidelines. The Consultant shall modify its work as necessary to meet the level of acceptability defined by the criteria above.

The Consultant has total responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the studies, reports, exhibits, plans and related designs, specifications and estimates prepared and shall check all such materials accordingly. The reports, plans, and other work products will 06/09/2026 C5 36 of 422

be reviewed by the District for conformity with the requirements of the Agreement.

Reviews by the District do NOT include detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted on the plans. The responsibility for accuracy and completeness of such items remains solely that of Consultant.

All completed work, including surveys, workshop documents, schematic designs, ancillary reports, calculations, correspondence, and all other work product developed as part of this project, whether in written, video, or electronic formats, becomes the property of the District at the end of the project.

X. ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES

The Consultant shall be paid based upon hourly rates and unit costs for services rendered as negotiated. Sub-consultant costs shall be allocated on a per task basis but does not need to be broken out by each staff classifications. The District limits mark up for sub- consultants and direct costs to 5%. This information will be used by District staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the estimated cost of services and will be used in negotiating the final fee amounts for the contract agreement. Hourly rates shall be based on work occurring in 2026. Proposed rates shall clearly correlate with names and classifications of staff likely to be involved with the projects.

The Consultant shall be paid based upon hourly rates for services rendered as negotiated.

There will be no compensation to the Consultant for hours expended due to the Consultant’s errors and omissions. There will be no adjustments including an increase in the hourly rate.

XI. METHOD OF PAYMENT

The Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to the District. Each invoice shall include a detailed breakdown of the services, the tasks, the hours, the personnel, and staff type who worked on the project, and hourly rates. No more than 85 percent of the total payment amount will be made prior to the final completion and approval of all work and delivery of final products.

XII. CONSULTING AGREEMENT

A sample Standard Consulting Agreement is enclosed for review, as Attachment “B”.

The RFP and the Consultant’s Proposals will be attached and become part of the Agreement as exhibits.

06/09/2026 C5 37 of 422

Any subsequent changes in the RFP from the date of issuance to the date of submittal will result in an addendum by the issuing office to those parties who have provided the proper notice of interest in responding to the RFP.

The signer of the proposal must declare in writing that the only person, persons, company or parties interested in the proposal as principals are named therein; that the proposal is made without collusion with any other person, persons, company, or parties submitting a proposal; that it is in all respects fair and in good faith without collusion or fraud; and, that the signer of the proposal has full authority to bind the principal proposer.

Please refer to the sample agreement for the necessary amounts of general liability, automotive, worker’s compensation and professional liability insurance. The appropriate endorsements are also shown within the sample contract agreement. The insurance certificate shall include the City of Vista /Buena Sanitation District, its officers and employees as insured or additional insured.

XIII. ASSIGNED REPRESENTATIVES

The District will assign a responsible representative to administer the contract, and to assist the Consultant in obtaining information. The Consultant also shall assign a responsible representative (Project Manager), who shall be identified in the proposal.

The Consultant’s representative will remain in responsible charge of the Consultant’s duties from the Notice-to-Proceed through project completion. If the Consultant’s Project Manager should be unable to continue with the project, then the Consultant shall notify the District’s representative in writing. The District’s representative shall first approve any substitution of representatives or sub-consultants identified in the proposal in writing. The District reserves the right to review and approve/disapprove all key staff and sub-consultant substitution or removal and may consider such changes not approved to be a breach of contract. This breach of contract will not apply if the Project Manager leaves the Consulting firm.

XIV. RIGHT TO REJECT PROPOSALS

The District reserves the right to delay the project or reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise.

The District reserves the right to extend the due date for the proposal, accept or reject any or all proposals received as a result of this request, negotiate with any qualified consultant or cancel this RFP in part or in its entirety. The District may require the 06/09/2026 C5 38 of 422

selected consultant to participate in negotiations and to submit such technical, fee, or other revisions of their proposals as may result from negotiations.

All costs incurred in the preparation of the proposal, the submission of additional information and/or any aspect of a proposal prior to award of a written contract will be borne by the Respondent. The District will provide only the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred to herein and will not be responsible for any other cost or obligation of any kind, which may be incurred by the Respondent. All proposals submitted to the Buena Sanitation District become the property of the District.

XV. DISCLOSURE

The District is a public agency subject to the disclosure requirements of the Public Records Act, California Government Code Section 6250 and following. These requirements include an exemption for “trade secrets”. If any proprietary information is contained in or attached to the written proposal, it must be clearly identified. In order to protect trade secrets from disclosure, pursuant to a public Records Acts request, you must agree in writing to defend and indemnify the Buena Sanitation District if litigation results.

XVI. LATE, MODIFIED, OR WITHDRAWN PROPOSAL

Any Proposal received after the exact time specified for submittal will not be considered.

Any modification of a proposal, except a modification resulting from the District's request for "best and final" offer, is subject to the same conditions as the initial submission.

Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice received at any time prior to Notice of Intent to Award. Thereafter, all proposals constitute firm offers, subject to negotiation and execution of definitive documents that will remain open and cannot be revoked, withdrawn, or modified for a period of six (6) months thereafter.

XVII. CONCLUSION

If after reviewing the above requirements, the Consultant is interested in proposing your services to the Buena Sanitation District, the Consultant should notify the District of their interest and their intent to submit a proposal. All submittals must be received in the Engineering Department by the date and time listed in this RFP.

The selected consultant will be asked to negotiate a final scope of work, fee, and schedule for the project. Small contracts up to $150,000 may be awarded by the Buena District Manager. Larger contracts over $150,000 must be approved by the Buena Sanitation Board.

06/09/2026 C5 39 of 422

Sincerely,

Jason Rivera, PE
Capital Projects Manager
City of Vista and Buena Sanitation District
760-643-5403
[email protected]

Attachment A: Vicinity Map of CIP 8396 – Sycamore Ave/SR-78 Sewer Master Plan and profile sheets

Attachment B: Standard Consulting Agreement

Attachment C: Reference As-Built Drawings

06/09/2026 C5 40 of 422

ATTACHMENT “A”

Vicinity Map of CIP 8396 – Sycamore Ave/SR-78
Sewer Master Plan and profile sheets

06/09/2026 C5 41 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 42 of 422

#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
8''
15'
'
8''
8''
8''
BO
_
B
3 C
,

2 4
'
'
EX_
B
3 ,

2 4
'
'
Las
t

R
e
v
i
s
e
d
:

M
a
y

1 5
,

2 0
2 5

[
E
N
T
E
R

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

W
I
S
E

P
A
T
H

N
A
M
E

T
O

M
X
D
]

F
o
r

E
x
a
m
p
l
e
:
p
w
:
/
/
C
a
r
o
l
l
o
/
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
/
C
l
i
e
n
t
/
C
A
/
C
l
i
e
n
t
N
a
m
e
/
1 0
2 6
5 A
0 0
/
D
a
t
a
/
G
I
S
/
F
i
g
u
r
e
_
0 1
_
0 1
.
a
p
r
x
O
0 225112.5
US Feet
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.

Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.

Data Sources: San Diego County GIS,
City of Vista GIS, ESRI

SEWER MASTER PLAN
MAY 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Improvement EX_B3

CITY OF VISTA AND BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT
Legend
"=)Septic Pump Station
Improvement
UT Septic Tank
#Septic Pipes
#Lining Projects
#Existing Improvements
#Future Improvements
Other Manholes
"=)Pump Station

WWTP WWTP
!P Outfalls
Force Main
Gravity Main
Vista City Limits
Buena Sanitation District
Boundary
06/09/2026 C5 43 of 422

Improvement Project EX_B3
Location: Sycamore Avenue under the 78 Freeway
Original Pipeline diameter: 15''
Improvement Pipeline Diameter: 24"
Pipeline Length: 700
From/To Manhole IDs: B08032-B08052
Maximum HGL (Existing System Conditions - No Improvement) Maximum HGL (Existing System Conditions - With Improvement)

CITY OF VISTA AND BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

SEWER MASTER PLAN
MAY 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
06/09/2026 C5 44 of 422

Improvement Project EX_B3
Location: Sycamore Avenue under the 78 Freeway
Original Pipeline diameter: 15''
Improvement Pipeline Diameter: 24"
Pipeline Length: 700
From/To Manhole IDs: B08032-B08052
Maximum HGL (Buildout Conditions - No Improvement)
Maximum HGL (Buildout Conditions - With Improvement)

CITY OF VISTA AND BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

SEWER MASTER PLAN
MAY 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
06/09/2026 C5 45 of 422

ATTACHMENT “B”

Standard Consulting Agreement
06/09/2026 C5 46 of 422

00034875 3 1 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FOR SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS (CIP 8396)
THIS “CONTRACT” is entered into by and between the “Parties” as of ___________________ (“Contract Date”).

1.0 THE “PARTIES”
The “City”:

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT, a chartered
municipal corporation
200 Civic Center Drive
Vista, CA 92084

Working Contact: WorkingName
Billing Contact: BillingName
The “Contractor”

Namex, statusx
Address1
Address2

Contact: ContactName

2.0 BASIC TERMS

2.1 The “Services” to be performed by Contractor are set forth in (“Exhibit A”).

2.2 The “Required License” for the Services is: California Professional Civil Engineer.

2.3 Contractor, an entity holding the Required License, desires to enter into this “Contract” with City for the Services.

2.4 The “Project” for which the Services are required is described in Exhibit A.

2.5 Contractor has submitted to City a Proposal to perform the Services dated proposaldate (“Exhibit B”).

2.6 The “Contract Ceiling Price” is: pricex.

2.7 This Contract requires the payment of prevailing wages. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Contract, the Contractor shall execute and deliver to City the Labor Law Compliance Form (Exhibit D).

3.0 CONTRACT TERM

3.1 This Contract shall take effect as of the Contract Date.

3.2 This Contract shall be in effect for xx calendar months (“Term”) from the Contract Date. The Term may be extended at the City’s option for an additional yy months, in increments of City’s choice, for a maximum Term of zz from the Contract Date.

3.3 City may terminate this Contract upon 30-days’ written notice to Contractor. In such event, or upon request of City, Contractor shall assemble all City documents in the Contractor's possession, put them in order for proper filing and closing, and deliver the 06/09/2026 C5 47 of 422

00034875 3 2 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
documents to City. In the event of termination, Contractor shall be paid for work performed to the termination date. City shall make the final determination as to the portion of tasks completed and the compensation to be paid.

4.0 SCOPE
Contractor shall perform all Services including, but not limited to, the furnishing of all tools, equipment, materials, software, supplies, and manufactured articles, and for furnishing all transportation, services, including fuel, power and water, essential communications, and the performance of all labor, work or other operations, as may be required from time to time, in accordance with Exhibit A and Exhibit B. The Services shall be complete, and all work, material, and services not expressly called for in the Proposal which may be necessary for complete and proper construction to carry out the Contract in good faith, shall be performed, furnished, and installed by the Contractor at no increase in cost to City. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit A and Exhibit B, the provisions of Exhibit A shall control.

5.0 COMPENSATION

5.1 City shall pay Contractor on a time and material rate as set forth in Exhibit B for the Services to be performed.

5.2 An invoice for payment shall be submitted in a form satisfactory to City. At a minimum, the invoice shall include: the purchase order number, the work order number, a description of the work performed, and a total amount.

5.3.1 The changes, additions, and deductions to be made.

5.3.2 The increase or decrease in compensation due the Contractor, if any.

5.3.3 Adjustment in the time of completion, if any.

5.4 Contract Ceiling Price

5.4.1 In no event shall City be liable for paying more than the Contract Ceiling Price for Contractor's services rendered under this contract.

5.4.2 If it becomes foreseeable that Contractor will need to perform services such that the cumulative total of costs to City will exceed the maximum permitted by this Contract, any such cost overrun will be handled pursuant to the change order procedure in Chapter 3.08. City and Contractor recognize that City lacks authority to exceed the cost ceiling without the express authorization of the City Council. If the maximum cost to City for this Contract is exceeded unexpectedly, payment shall be made as mutually agreeable and disputes shall be handled pursuant to this Contract, but work shall cease as soon as is reasonably feasible once the cost ceiling plus allowable change orders, if any, is exceeded.

06/09/2026 C5 48 of 422

00034875 3 3 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

5.5 Except as provided in Exhibit B, Contractor shall not be reimbursed for any expenses incurred in rendering services under this Contract.

7.0 TIME FOR COMPLETION AND COMMENCEMENT OF SERVICES
All Services under the Contract must be completed in compliance with the schedule in Exhibit A.

8.0 ASSISTANCE BY CITY
All information, data, records, reports, and maps as are in possession of City and necessary for the carrying out of this work shall be available to Contractor without charge. City shall make available to Contractor members of its staff for consultation with Contractor in the performance of this Contract. City does not warrant that the information data, records, reports, and maps heretofore or to be provided to Contractor are complete or accurate and Contractor should satisfy itself as to accuracy and completeness. City and Contractor agree that City shall have no liability should any information, data, records reports, and maps be inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading. Unless provided in Exhibit A, no other assistance shall be provided by City to Contractor.

9.0 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE

9.2 Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the Term of this Contract. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the services set forth in this Contract, including any business licenses required by City. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this Section.

10.0 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS

10.1 Except as otherwise provided, whenever reference is made to “Standard Specifications”, it shall mean:

06/09/2026 C5 49 of 422

00034875 3 4 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, most current edition and supplement, as last amended, with Regional Supplements, written and promulgated by Southern California Chapter, American Public Works Association, and Southern California District, Associated General Contractors of California, Joint Cooperative Committee (“Greenbook”) and the City of Vista Special Provisions to the Greenbook.

10.2 Except as otherwise provided, whenever reference is made to “Standard Plans”, it shall mean:

San Diego Area Regional Standard Drawings, and City of Vista Standard Drawings, latest edition, unless otherwise noted.

City: The City of Vista.

Board: The City Council of the City of Vista.

Drawings or Plans: All drawings, plans, maps, profiles, and diagrams delineating the work on the Services.

12.0 CONTRACTOR’S STATUS; CONTRACTOR’S EMPLOYEES

12.1 Contractor shall perform the services provided for herein in Contractor's own way as an independent contractor and in pursuit of Contractor's independent calling. Contractor is not to be considered an employee of City, nor shall any employees of Contractor be considered employees of City, for any purpose. Contractor shall be under the direction and control of City staff only as to the results to be accomplished. This Contract is not intended to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture, or association between City and Contractor.

12.3 Neither Contractor, nor any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights.

00034875 3 5 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
subcontractors are entitled for performance of any work under this contract. Neither Contractor nor Contractor’s officers or employees are entitled to any salary or wages, or retirement, health, leave or other fringe benefits applicable to employees of the City. City will not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of Contractor. City shall not be required to pay any workers' compensation insurance on behalf of Contractor.

12.6 Contractor agrees to defend and indemnify City for any obligation, claim, suit or demand for tax, retirement contribution including any contribution to the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), social security, salary or wages, overtime payment, or workers' compensation payment which City may be required to make on behalf of Contractor or any employee of Contractor, or any employee of Contractor construed to be an employee of City, for work done under this contract. This is a continuing obligation that survives the termination of this Contract.

13.0 CIVIL RIGHTS

13.7 To the fullest extent permitted by law and without limitation by the other provisions of this Contract relating to indemnification and insurance, Contractor shall also indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, and its directors, officers, employees and agents from and against all liability (including without limitation all claims, damages, penalties, fines, and judgments, associated investigation and administrative expenses, and defense costs, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, and costs of alternative dispute resolution) resulting from any claim of discrimination or harassment, including but not 06/09/2026 C5 51 of 422

00034875 3 6 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
limited to sexual harassment, arising from the conduct of the Contractor or any of the Contractor’s officers, employees, agents, licensees, or subcontractors. In the event of a discrimination or harassment complaint against any employee, agent, licensee or subcontractors of Contractor or its subcontractors, Contractor shall take immediate and appropriate action in response to such complaint, including, but not limited to termination or appropriate discipline of any responsible employee, agent, licensee or subcontractors. The provisions of this Section survive completion of the services or termination of the Contract.

14.0 CONTROL OF SERVICES
Each Party shall appoint a representative who shall have the authority to represent and act for that Party (“Representative”). Any written or verbal directions or requests of City's Representative delivered to the Contractor’s Representative shall have the same force and effect as if delivered to the Contractor. The Contractor's Representative shall have the authority to sign any change order, coordinate the work of all subcontractors and make other decisions pertaining to the Contract.

15.0 ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONSULTING

15.1 Neither this Contract nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of the City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty-five (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Contractor, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Contract shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Contractor or any surety of Contractor of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

15.2 Contractor shall be fully responsible to the City for any acts and omissions of Contractor's subcontractor, including persons either directly or indirectly employed by subcontractor, in the event Contractor subcontracts any of the work to be performed under this contract. Contractor's responsibility under this paragraph shall be identical to Contractor's liability for acts and omissions of Contractor and employees of the Contractor. Nothing contained in this Contract shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor of Contractor, but Contractor shall bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this contract applicable to Contractor's work, unless such change, omission, or addition is approved in advance in writing by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. All subcontractors are subject to the prior written review and approval of the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee.

06/09/2026 C5 52 of 422

00034875 3 7 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

17.0 FINANCIAL` RECORDS

17.1 Contractor shall maintain any and all documents, ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or records demonstrating or relating to Contractor’s performance of services pursuant to this Contract or evidencing or relating to expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Contract. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Contract. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three years from the date of execution of this Contract and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. It is expressly understood and agreed that the provisions of this Section will survive termination of this Contract.

17.2 Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Contractor's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Contract or the primary location from which services are rendered, whichever is closer.

18.0 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Upon delivery, the work product, including without limitation, all original reports, writings, recordings, drawings, files, and detailed calculations developed under this contract are the property of City. Contractor agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this contract shall be vested in City and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual property rights in favor of City. City acknowledges that its use of the work product is limited to the purposes contemplated by the scope of Services and that Contractor makes no representation of the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the scope of Services.

19.0 CONFIDENTIALITY

19.1 Contractor shall treat all information obtained from City in the performance of this Contract as confidential and proprietary to City. Contractor shall treat all records and work product prepared or maintained by Contractor in the performance of this Contract as confidential.

19.2 Contractor agrees that it will not use any information obtained as a consequence of the performance of work for any purpose other than fulfillment of Contractor’s scope of Services. Contractor will not disclose any information prepared for City or obtained from City or obtained as a consequence of the performance of work to any person other than City, or its own employees, agents or subcontractors who have a need for the information for the performance of Services under this Contract unless such disclosure is specifically authorized in writing by City.

19.3 Contractor’s obligations under this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Contract.
06/09/2026 C5 53 of 422

00034875 3 8 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

20.0 CONFLICT OF INTEREST REQUIREMENT
Contractor agrees that, to the extent applicable, it shall comply with and be bound by all laws and regulations deriving from the relationship of the Contractor to the City, including the Political Reform Act (Government Codes Section 87100 et seq.) Chapters 2.32 or 2.33 of the Vista Municipal Code, the Community Redevelopment Act (Health & Safety Code 33000 et seq.) and all regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively “Conflict Laws”). As a condition precedent to the formation of this Contract, Contractor warrants and covenants that it is adequately informed regarding the obligations and duties imposed by the Conflict Laws and that to the best of Contractor's knowledge and belief, there exists no conflict of interest (under the laws) that would disqualify the Contractor from participation in any decisions arising out of the performance of this Contract. Prior to commencement of any work in the performance of this Contract, Contractor shall comply with any applicable requirements of Chapter 2.32 of the Vista Municipal Code, including any requirement to file a financial disclosure statement with the City Clerk.

Contractor further agrees that no employee, agent, or subcontractor for Contractor shall perform any work for the City pursuant to this Contract which will violate the Conflict Laws.

21.0 PROHIBITION OF FINANCIAL INTEREST BY CITY OFFICIAL Contractor warrants and covenants to City that no City Official has or will have any current or future financial interest in this Contract as of the date approved, nor shall Contractor promise, offer, or enter into any written, oral or implied Contract, to provide any financial interest or remuneration of any kind or manner to any City official with respect to this Contract. For purposes of this Section, the term “City Official” shall mean and include any elected or appointed officer of City, any employee of City, or any spouse or financial dependent of a City official or employee. A violation of this provision shall render this Contract null and void and Contractor shall be subject to restitution of all fees or money paid or earned under this Contract.

22.0 INDEMNIFICATION

22.1 Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers harmless against any and all liability, loss, damage, fine, penalty, expense, claim or cost (including without limitation costs and fees of litigation) of every nature (collectively, “Liability”) arising out of or in connection with this Contract or its performance, including defects in design, except: (1) Liability caused by City's sole negligence or willful misconduct; or (2) for Liability caused by City's active negligence, in which case the indemnity received by City shall be reduced by the amount: (i) that City's active negligence contributed to the Liability on a comparative basis; or (ii) such other amount as may be required by law (“Duty of Indemnification”).

22.2 The review, acceptance or approval of Contractor’s work or work product by any indemnified party shall not affect, relieve, or reduce Contractor’s indemnification or defense obligations. This Section survives completion of the services or the termination of this contract. The provisions of this Section are not limited by and do not affect the provisions of this contract relating to insurance.

22.3 Contractor’s costs of defense shall not exceed Contractor’s proportionate percentage of fault as adjudicated by a court of law, as required by California Civil Code section 2782.8.

06/09/2026 C5 54 of 422

00034875 3 9 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

23.0 INSURANCE AND BONDS
Contractor shall comply with the insurance provisions set forth in Exhibit C.

24.0 SERVICE OF NOTICE

24.2 A Party may change its address by giving notice as provided above, and the changed address shall thereafter be deemed to be the address set forth in Section 1.0.

25.0 SPECIAL PROVISIONS
This Contract is subject to, and Contractor shall comply with, the special provisions referenced in Exhibit E, if any.

26.0 EXHIBITS
All documents referenced as exhibits in this Contract, or referenced in an exhibit to this Contract, are incorporated herein.

28.0 PREVAILING WAGES
Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Contractor is advised that certain work contemplated in this contract may be subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815 of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Sections 1774–1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City and the Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

00034875 3 10 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages
Code Section 1725.5. All Contractors and sub-Contractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Contractor is further advised that any prevailing wage work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

06/09/2026 C5 56 of 422

00034875 3 11 of 11 NAMEX
Professional Services – RFP – Prevailing Wages

31.0 EXECUTION
IN WITNESS WHEREOF; the Parties hereto have executed this Contract as of the Contract Date.

“City”

CITY OF VISTA, a chartered municipal
corporation

By:

JOHN CONLEY, CITY MANAGER
JOHN B. FRANKLIN, MAYOR

ATTEST:

KATHY VALDEZ, CITY CLERK

By:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

WALTER CHUNG, CITY ATTORNEY

By:

RISK MANAGEMENT REVIEW:

ANALISA HOLBROOK, RISK MANAGER

By:

“Contractor”

NAMEX, statusx

By:

Name/Title

By:

Name/Title

06/09/2026 C5 57 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

06/09/2026 C5 58 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit B

EXHIBIT B
CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL

06/09/2026 C5 59 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit C, Page 1 of 3

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. Nothing in these provisions shall limit Contractor’s Duty of Indemnification.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (“CGL”): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products, completed operations, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering Code 1 (any auto), with limits no less than $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employers’ Liability insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Contractor shall also provide the additional coverages checked below and at least as broad as:

4. Professional Liability, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate.

If the Contractor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either: the Contractor shall cause the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.

Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of with respect 06/09/2026 C5 60 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit C, Page 2 of 3
to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by or on behalf of the Contractor. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85 or both CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used), unless otherwise approved in advance by City.

2. For any claims related to this Project, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.

Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to City.

Claims Made Policies
If any coverage required is written on a claims-made coverage form:

1. The retroactive date must be shown, and this date must be before the execution date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of contract work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective, or start of work date, the Contractor must purchase extended reporting period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.

4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to City.

Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby agrees to waive rights of subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors.

Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable insurance language, effecting coverage required by this contract. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. City reserves the right to require 06/09/2026 C5 61 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit C, Page 3 of 3
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, required by these specifications, at any time.

Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage, subcontractors shall provide coverage with a format least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other circumstances.

06/09/2026 C5 62 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit D

AGREEMENT TO COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW REQUIREMENTS [Labor Code §§ 1720, 1771.1, 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, 1860, 1861, 3700] The undersigned Contractor certifies that it is aware of and hereby agrees to fully comply with the following provisions of California law:

1. No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)]. No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

2. Contractor acknowledges that this contract is subject to the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works and the awarding public agency (“Agency”) and agrees to be bound by all the provisions thereof as though set forth in full herein.

3. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1773.8 which requires the payment of travel and subsistence payments to each worker needed to execute the work to the extent required by law.

4. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the Agency, forfeit not more than fifty dollars ($50) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done under the contract by Contractor or by any subcontractor.

5. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1776 which require Contractor and each subcontractor to (1) keep accurate payroll records, (2) certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776, and (3) inform the Agency of the location of the records. The Contractor is responsible for compliance with Section 1776 by itself and all of its subcontractors.

6. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1777.5 concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects, and further agrees that Contractor is responsible for compliance with Section 1777.5 by itself and all of its subcontractors.

7. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the Agency, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the California Labor Code.

8. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Contractor hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker’s compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
Signature Date
Name/Title Company:
06/09/2026 C5 63 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit E

EXHIBIT E

SPECIAL PROVISIONS
This Contract is subject to the following provisions, if checked:

1. State of California grant conditions, as attached.

2. Federal grant conditions, as attached.

3. Other conditions, as attached.

06/09/2026 C5 64 of 422

ATTACHMENT “C”

Reference As-Built Drawings

06/09/2026 C5 65 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 66 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 67 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 68 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 69 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 70 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 71 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 72 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 73 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 74 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 75 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 76 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 77 of 422

73.04 PROFILE GRADE ©Stage 5 Const REGISTERED ENGINEER -CIVIL ,Elev 418.25 Seal .No Scale ©5'-55"Closure Pour Stage 5 Consi:vu ®2"Electrical conduit,see "Road Plons":BB —a_162-0 meosured along &Rte 78 of p—EB for pull box type and locations 12-3-90 !SE Lv PLANS APPROVAL DATE67-2%749%117-5""|
>
’o”.fae .
i £>37-95 ©,31-0"©,37'-%
{t=o mt ee eh a Em ,tos ES me Stage 2 Const Stoge |Const Stage 4 Const ;. }Ee r %HiTiay —m=
7 [ol =::'
!t=15-9 SEES c=
i Lc Pte 8 |:i
:
’rr ’”-’rr |!’wi oa.—~rr |~~[22 r ”;»~~er |
:Dotum Elev 375.0 Abut |[Bent 2 O@ns EFS spur 3 1-9 10-0",_36-0 Lo lr-or ol TY 36°-C —-o :id|+|!||:e_Alee |rhe 0 :510 511 512 34-02 |||34-0"|||:
:||H .ELEVATION 5 |el |Protile Grove Lo{.”_r
-i 2 |{‘-
Pile Dota =30 A)'N\ATE iN\>A .::;
|Locotion Type Design Loading Specified Tip Elev Probable Tip Elev AVERAGE TIR X =AA —=4Z iw"—4X N n Os a(Service Load)LOO Cee Trt:Abui |Class 70 -Alt W 70 Tons 378.0 373.0 373.0 ||TT 25 £5 /]!Abut |Ret Walls HP 10 x 57 45 Tons 378.0 373.0 377.0 L /||1 |]|Tr Li ! i Bent 2 HP 10 x 57 70 Tons 378.0 373.0 374.7 PC/PS "I"Girders ’;—1Abut3RetWall=Li HP 10 x 57 45 Tons 390.0 385.0 385.0 TYPICAL SECTIONAbut3RetWoll-Rt HP 10 x 57 45 Tons 380.0 375.0 379.0 :;€Sycamore Ave (Exist)—_—€Sycamore Ave (Future)APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES >T=op"iBRIDGEREMOVAL,LOCATION E LUMP SUM5/1+13.62 POC ¢Rte 78 67 FURNISH STEEL PILING (HP 10 X 57)1,168 LF :.5/1+32.3%POC ¢Rte 78 FURNISH FILING.(CLASS 0)©we INDEX TO PLANS:10+00.00 POT €Syc Ave (Exist)-DRIVE PILE (CLASS 30)=LE| 9+95.34 POT ¢Syc Ave (Fufure)FURNISH PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE |i NE uo —STRESSED CONC
;
—
\GIRDER (80 1-90 ')RETE 18 EA SHEET NO.TITLE *
!15°43°47"ERECT PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETEskewEL426.87 ATE op 36 Ea /General Plan|EL.42765 N 12"NEOPRENE STRIP 487 on = 3 EA 18907]EARLIER REVISION OATES — sm|
561 1.06
|

7.508 sm!|I i17i

TTTTT
+aad
06/09/2026 C5 78 of 422

¢Bent 2
Edge of deck422423xXSX*xX xX X

~~z ay |meove |POST MILES SHIT |TOTALDIST]COTY |Route |CART JULES ISAT OTA ;7 7 7Ilsb|78 |57H22 |196 |261 oe 1 - |
|
||0i@iVv©
3|
i
!¢Rte 78 §
g509:00.00 ©|
0©2
© \
418
x SeHE x x x
Edge of deck
\
ONXxxxX X X
503.
5 0
,
=
PLAN
I -

20"
contoursO-Indicates even foot
x=/0"intervals
Contours do not include camber

GENERAL.NOTES
LOAD FACTOR DESIGN :

DESIGN:BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
(1983 AASHTO with Interims ond Revisions by CALTRANS)i
DEAD LOAD:Includes 35 psf for future wearing surface.:

LIVE |—VLnnn a LOADING:HS520-44 and alternative and permit design ioad.!N i(SSS ANN REINFORCED :SR J CONCRETE: f,=60,000 psifL=3,250 psiAbut.|Abut.3 n =8Bents2Note:Abut |&3 stem concrete strength Transverse Deck Siabs (Working Siress Design)|to be 4,000 psi @ 28 days.fe =20,000 psi NO AS BUILT CHANGESfo=1.200 psi NF ee !n =10 SUC BIRStructuralConcrete,Bridge iPRESTRESSEDcongrsoggedRBHANNIGAN:NR Structural Concrete,Bridge Footing CONCRETE:See ‘Prestressing Notes®ae CTT |—wuniacy 110188074 :v0 Structural Concrete,Bridge ....Not for Prestressed "I"Girders 2 RLTURAL t=36.000 .i TTT |(4.500 psi at 28 days)see "Prestressing Notes”.:y -’psi w_2/25/9%|—’,iPpa(Tons Per Square Foot)FRS 4 15/54 :=DESIGNCONCRETESTRENGTHANDTYPELIMITSALLOWABLEHeSIGN !No Scale i
0E ay To CHECKED |-STATE OF BRIDGE NO.\|“|Trocy Vocura WR CE CALIFORNIA |hvistoN or stAucrumes 57-¢02 |
SYCAMORE AVENUE UC -REPLACE |DETAILS Rich Kuroko 6-90 MJ Cullen STRUCTURE DESIGN 11 POST MILEQUANTITIES |
™
|
oi Fong “©Dennis Haglan
|
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION nN 9.08 DECK CONTOURS |0S 0SD 2139 (CACO 4/89)ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHES |CU 1 |DISREGARD PRINTS BEARING IT AE a Se on rn losFORREDUCEDPLANSo)»3 EA 18907]EARLIER REVISION DATES am [goo]i i 2 17 -

06/09/2026 C5 79 of 422

i
DT Tm rr ee me en rn rm rm...mm

>/1C +00.cO ¢€
©7?+95.341 ¢
®
.

CURVE DATA

£Rte.78
R =3000A_34-2847"
7 =230943
L =/805.354
0 N 2003894.079
£6264/32.302
BENCH
511 112.967 ¢€R*s 78
5/1 }32.67/¢Rie.78
#75 +50.677 BC ¢€Rte.78
G.5/3456.03/EC.¢Rie 78

N 2005,768.0%0ExistSycamoreAve.E 6266474.975
N 2005753.463Prop.Sycemore Ave.EF 6266464.€0)
N 72006685.6/9
E 626523/.082
N 2005573./89
£62666/8.388

SYCAMORE AVE.UC.

BRIDGE NO.57-0402L
(TO BE REPLACED)
(A.C.OVERLAY)

MARKS

Mon.78-2861 Eley.442.24CaliformeDepartmentofTransportation Srass List on 2"ren pipe,stamped78-285 L 1988,785(F of sts 2857 £7.75 LOT BT Ine.

SMF VET Elev.$18.657.round serie)farget cn shoulder 53°:
|SYCAMORE AVE.UC. BRIDGE NO.57-0402R
(TO BE REPLACED)
(A.C.OVERLAY)
/—~
Note :Far pile layout sec "abut“Ahut 3 Layout”&"Rent Nera

05 03D 2145 (4/89)

ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHES
— —N—aa
OA
S
AA
ST
R
SSRPRELIMINARYINVESTIGATIONSECTIONDESIGN|Vecure ER CollenSCALEoN50DATUMPHOTOGRAMMETRYASOF1DRAWN"CARLO PACLIBAR78Y oetais |
™Kuro Ko CEE Cullen-SURVEYED
|
ov TRACED a or CHECKEDALIGNMENTTIESFIELDCHECKED
|
O%/,pe 7-72-89
|

CHECKED
|
o JOe 7-29-99 |OUANTITIES Fong Haglan

FOR REDUCED PLANS
0 bh Ai <HL 4CVTBiz|™:0 \DIRT
Low oud”,
[5 Ho 2"sheets.indicates hottor oF tg elev.
———

=
\—a20~—

KW LOL
XR 2940!
410.00]

05.00 .POST MILES 1}SHEE? to7aDIST|COUNTY |ROUTE |yo7aL PROJECT Cha.fgerree|||I SO |78 |s7m22 197!26 AG Cler
REGISTERED EMGINEER-C ivi
12-3-90

PLANS APPROVAL DATE

oo YR ey Gp LR HANNIG4p
NERY
to 2/25/94

NOAS BUILT CHANGES
te Cw wae
.q4 7WYway.=P Se
1890 74
—
£RS 2119/9,

STATE OF BRIDGE NO.CL —_——Al DIVISION OF STRUCTURES 57-0402 SYCAMORE AVENUE UC-REPLACECALIFORNIA[structure pesion |][Foe —=DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0.0 FOUNDATION PLAN EA 182071 DISREGARD PRINTS BEARINGEARLIERREVISIONDATES

REVISION DATES (BRI
LTT
IMINARY STAGE ONLY iSuEEs OF tL
i i y =Pat::ios PoE

ob
06/09/2026 C5 80 of 422

Drainage Note:|so 78 |5702.2 re198 |261
|
|i Flow direction &location const]jt F J giz|N=:/i /
=p=—_.Ee i ==Ce ==-Se ==Abur 5 :,oa 7 7 —\/7FT 7 _5F a i 7 ]y i 7 /==>VSED )/€Abur Erg i
;A yy [Ce dy Ho ;;;OPTIONAL RETURN WALILNDETAIL i:/:////////////2 x ;[TTT TTT 7 171 7 L [/in =ron \| :/Hy ang oT S/
i _RN v lee _vole ©pd BRS X/i
=35 —5 6-5 6-5"6-5"6’-5"5 oO 7 -05 =35 -Z5
A Tod mh 4 Bg BR &i
1 Et teen
et
mee
fo
fonts EonteneT Eon fon-Eten
3 ~,:
|50 gr a 3-2 \_r_72"
yg {OORECY)CS BY J.~HANNIGAN /
CTE A 11-1890 74 i
59-10"
5g9-gir
Gy LimIRACT jo.89 ov ——7se —
|tc ~asee /y ||
FRS 4/19/94 7 iIteelHPiles©Ret Wall shown.PLAN ®®®®®®3 o ®~||L Indicates vertical pile.>5 ®®®®/®®®®FT :Lr =LO" _&_CD EF
—
—Gs —oo RR De =eS My
|3 Indicates battered pile (1:3)&v ¢®®®=®®~®=®®=©®®v v ®©®of ;! ©©©©©j9 ©of ©©©©©©©2;0 ||
3 @14-0"=42-0"|4 ©14-0"=56°-0"N Qf ;!Co Detoil "A"See Detail "B™BD)4th row 4 @ 4-0"=56-0"4 ©14-0"=56'-0"|~/|£Ist &3rd row 8 ee 7-0"=56-0"ole 8 &7-0"=55-0"| I
|
’rr —r re ’1d]r ”r re v 1)»re —_—»”|
|TN 2nd row)#e 7-0"=28-0 14'-0 z=|A =14-0 ott 8 7-0"=25-0 ol |m==,i i 56i=oy Ieee EI n|I A ETc|'c o!|i o |EE PILE LAYOUT~~_k $ 3 woo 1-0
;
)3 :32 oo ®Indicates vertical pile :
3 3 :
i
!:3
@ Indicotes boitiered pile {i:3)
i 3 {
i|Nore:;I 3 For Details "A","B"&Sections C-C,D-D &E-£:
i i $see "Abutment Details No.l"sheet.‘
:

For Section F-F,see "Abutment Details No.2":
sheet.
|
;
For Retaining Wall Details,see "Retaining Note A:i
;
Wall Details”sheet.Return Wail meoy be used or Controcters opti‘on i |Note:Piles not shown.ELEVA TION
in lieu of shering in Stage 2 &4,Top of
!-
Return Wall to be i8"below finished grode.:£2"=/'"-0"
:
!
i
:-To -To -CHECKED F a»BRIOGE NO.|iTracyVoeurathCullenCALIFORN[A |CnvistoN of stRucrumes s7-¢02 |

SYCAMORE AVENUE UC
-
REPLACEDETAILSRichKuroko7-80 MJ Cullen STRUCTURE DES 11 POST MILE iYXSIGN»; ouanTrTies |Fong OEE Dennis Haglan |DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 9.oe ABUTMENT LAYOUT0S0502139{CADD 4/89)To ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHES ''|CU 11 DISREGARD PRINTS BEARING TEVISION DATES (PRELIVIVARY STACE Gv)Cig :‘FOR REDUCED PLANS EA 18907]EARLIER REVISION GATES gon

06/09/2026 C5 81 of 422

INT cute |POST MILES 1 S=TET TOTALOisT.)county |Route oRRToRSR-INET 3%.::;Drainage Note:I sb ;78 |5.7022 |199!26 Flow direction &locationh"G I Pian"7 Jshownoneneralan"sheet 7)CI mm.me

REGISTERED ENGINEER -CIVIL

12-3-90

PLANS APPROVAL DATE

NOT USED

Elastomeric Brg Pod
zz x 10 x 1-8"tot 18
Stoge 2 177-88"ole Stoge 4
Const Stage |Const '!Stage |Const Const
Ftg const J ~G
/
-4 &,[3/see DETAILX
i 7

A
FTF 7 Far fT]/Clay 1]N'Y 1 /![gl ib UT UND [NJ

Begin skewing fransv reinf
in abut fig,stem &seat.—
ok 8-0"/

/AIVTTTTT1TN o ~/|€Gird G NOTE :STAGE 4 SHOW'S __:irder ~~ONLY 5 GIRDERS.i Wirjrfiiir i
:1 I i if J :.5@ 7-1"=35-5"6'-55"6°-5L 6"-55"|67-55"5@ 7-1"=35-5"6 GIRDERS.7 bo /-+ i i :i ¢¥J.i |ig :3 p=
;
50-gh"3-22 sr 72 Po !i ;lo /J {.i 60'-7"60°-9"||f Fh :;Steel H Piles ©@ Ret Wall shown.="=!Pl ::|T Indicat tical pil ~B [1]=:L Indicates vertica Ile.

J :°PLAN |1 I Indicates bottered pile (1:3)
:::
3"=1-0”
:
|Begin skewing tronsv reinf g-0"|x |:
i =Detail "A"See Detail "B"J in abut fig,stem &sect.lo —-. ]

DETAIL X
ON No Scale !

Leoyout of trensv cbui reinf cdjccent ‘to const?Joints.:L I {\ArfidelesyWE Ey xiT:::|,!!:'|:::1 :©gx spacing noi io exceed spacing i/]|||\1 ||1/||||!called out in Section F-F &G-G of ;|C C b.__D E E "Abut Details No.2"sheet.:|Sai ——oo -iNOTE:CCO*/6 &*/65-/deg yp JB HANNIGANREMOVEUNSUITABLEComercypeoeIETTANVINTG |i FOUNDATION MATERIAL ongiwucr..11-188074:ANDO REPLACE WITH 4 UY ’orm TT|4 SACK SLURRY.STAGE 2 STAGE 1 STAGE 4 Loe 2/23/9¢:RK =<E50 6 tt Note:FRS £]13/39+:k NON SONS NNN ON [2000 SSSSSSSSSSAIS ~NONNNT SNNT SONOS x For Deicils "A™"3"&Seciions C-C,0-0 &=-5,iNhe276NINNoSovSONNECD¥16 S-/~,NN ON bo see "Abuimeni [Details No.l!"sheet.;:Se AANA I po)For Section G-G,see "Abuiment Detoiis No.2"|ELEVATION |sheer.| For Retaining Wail De:oiis,see "Retcin ng

i"=/'-0o"Woll Detoils™sheet.
!-N ov.mo mo CHECKED 1 —-BRIQGE NO.||TT coey Varuna |Wd Cullen C ALIFORNI p|owsion or stauerures of le SYCAMORE AVENUE UC -REPLACE |i DETAILS Rich Kuroko 7-90 MJ Cullen POST MILE —_-|a "oni Haglon |
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STRUCTURE DESIGN 9.08 ABUTMENT 3 LAYOUT | i U5 OSC 2139 (CADDO 4/89)ORIGINAL SCALZ IN 'NCHESFORREDUCEDPLANS Cu tl DISREGARD PRINTS SEARING SEIS S078 (MLIvINT STAC vy 2€EA 189071 ARLIER REVISION DATES megan 7.54 36 10 |0.00 |i S i i7

06/09/2026 C5 82 of 422

4"Exponded

fillerI»2
C sides.—
!Exp Jt

polysivrene—Ta
fo-13)L J 3 Expanded fbo-13)£EW,Ss polystyrene \I3-2)|Ni NL L #5[tor z =|~~ol LL ||J.)
Ol \3 As Exp jt filler /N '4.|rxiec~#6 tof 4 —/Pod 3"min ——@—~-0"yp ]~~#6 fot 4Levei]|5-47 [8 —* 3 PR L7 =~~Hi ~~s
4-#5x7-0|_L~~>—Const jt;|
DETAIL "A"DETAIL "B"
Lr =0"i =J-0"4-#6
/
@ #8 x 4'-0"piace +-u ’"&holes ©
ends of girder.Bend or hook #8 x 4°'-0"
into the end diaph.
@ Exponded Polystyrene samethicknessasbrgpad.

#5
@
6 To
p
&
Bo
t

DS 0SO 2138 (CADD 4/89)

o ‘2~O~#5 5VAS fop &bot

Extend longit—
reinf.

DIST.county |mouTE |POST MILES{TOTAL PRCJECT
|so |78
§i
T TL5.7n2.2

REGISTERED ENGINEER -Civil

12-3-90PLANSAPPROVAL DATE

\&top &bottom
3-3"
/
#5 J top &bottom
1-3

D.Hogion 7-00
|
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .

ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHES ||Cu 11 DISREGARD PRINTS BEARINGFORREDUCEDPLANSEA189071

A A #7 @ 9 fop |£7 @ 9 topaly-1 /=<<|#5 @ 9 bottom !"#5 @ 9 bottom4-#6ulF-J y//~~4 L FTG CORNER:eh Feo€oy —=1 "Expanded polystyrene iV {C .i/PLAN @ top.#6 tot s5-#7 J[1]2 KEY DETAIL SECTION A-A ’
Back face batter to march Getrer —~_on adjacent Ret Wall (typ).Motch adjacent Ret Wallthickness(typ). :eo Abut backwall reinf#5
sy —~Const jt
7SHee ]
#4 tot 4 tend=L L ast into fra.°"
0 Se \7 |=J NO AS BUILT CHANGES#4 tot =(#5 tot 8 #5 tor 4 Cis Le 8 ET oven Toe18 Flee Teta lNCpolystyrenesame[]
”
tot 4 thickness os brg pad.#5 e ig
Sui or s ny 2 HANNIGAN
wiser 117189074SECTIONC-C SECTION D-D SECTION E-E co 2/23/944”=j="4 =|'-0"Lr ='-0" FRS 2/19/04
-oY NE BRIOGE NO.="Tracy Vacuro 7-901"wy Cutten 7-00 CA LIFORN A |onasion or srrwerimes s7-a02 |

SYCAMORE AVENUE UC
-
REPLACEDETAILSRichKuroko7-80 MJ Cullen 7-90 POST WILE|wos [7 Lat Fora 70a |STRUCTURE DEstoN 11 5.06 __ABUTMENT DETAILS NO.| EARLIER REVISION DATES mes
AEVIRIGN DATES (SAL ivinaay TAGE SvLvi surest cr 7-03.! 06/09/2026 C5 83 of 422

B88 or £8 —e.
;:Ir-0"og”Limits of (60-5)or (50-5 &distrib reinf H SD 78 ]|5.7112.2 i 20 261~ _
,..5-10 5-14 CYT]L—]"-3
//Md a hd 7
og NA
IS lf
fed ad fet -_—dorJtSealfo-2)MR -2 rm ”#5 x 2-0"@ 12 pe \__/£0 LS so" Structure Approach NY ~_¢abut B ||ere $aee ers.oe u rg

REGISTERED ENGINEER -CIVIL

a See Jt Protection Detail 12-3-90#4 cont tot 8 —#4 ©|8 —

PLANS APPROVAL DATE
Finished
|
——See Backwall Base Detail grade Bock f ;Cop-fyp.*1 gcrioce o See Note 5#4 @ 18 —#8 thru girder “Abuiment or |xloRetainingWol|—,GmI'-o"SN Jee e /8 ’*See OD on "Abut Details No.1”sheet.;i]3"Slotted~—#6 to?3 *~—Cetail “a”Plosiic Pipe.||he #4 ]8 8 place da G i See Neie B=A eocompost te Lllparalleltogirders.a

NJ #4 tot &between girders See Zh Drain HP dein A15@18ENDDIAPHiDetar6"Leactionee1"J Note B——-|ih
,
Lr =/'-0"
3"i !
!Ad oon
Plastic Pipe +or
AT
T
,

|3"4
==
L J ~il|PCC Approcch Slab WALL min#50 iz Joint seal /60-N\Alternative |SECTION SECTION A-Aa0TemporaryBumper-T with insertssJz-)\/-2/ #4 ©18 2 3"Bonding on y 1.IO mil PolyethyleneLJsmoothfinish-n -—-sheef C4 Bond ‘toIaFilterLo"Bo i .v Fabri |LA)Geocomposiier93”Bonding abric E|Dear**3 RIT :wrap miTT#1 @ 8 (cutoff alternate bars 1 My around - Bond 6”to >Level or sloped 10-0"above top of ftg)
To ¢J 7-~toward wgIXwall.Cut
hole for 3”
pipe.

RUI
N
N
I
N
N
N
I
N
N
[or8x12"Neoprene strip.Place prior to
bockfilling the=>.#7 C0 9 abutment backwall»|L
and installing the«2 L i [ez temporary bumper.

jg Cement Trecied
i Permeobie BoseDETAIL"A"DETAIL "B"
T—~1/"Chomfer
~~Abutment
BackwallVv WEEP HOLE AND GEOCOMPOSITE DRAIN

O
A
N
A
R
S
CE
S
S
I
S
S
S
S

-SYCAMORE AVENUE UC -REPLACE—=on Ro roo oe CALIFORNIA oTSon OF STRUCTURES o7 102 ouaTiTiEs [|oi Fong ~Dennis Hogten
|

DEPARTUENT OF TRANSPORTATION
|
1 WC TURE.DESIGN 11 9.08 ABUTMENT DETAILS NO.2

0S 0SD 2139 (CADD 4/89)ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHES |CU 11 DISREGARD PRINTS BEARING REVISION DATES (CRELIVINAQY STAGE ONLY)SUCET or0L0|>3 EA IBSO7I EARLIER REVISION DATES me |
750
|

7.1965 [0-0-0 7 17
|
i
|
.|—_————t=x (Fold neoprene Geocomposite|#6 x 9-4"©1677 LL I!)~A |l O into chamfer)drain ores:4 4"_—ts Y a oles:A.4" @
drains at intermediate sag points and at O5'mox.|———1 re -N JOINT PROTEC TION DE TAIL center fo center (9'c-c for Type 3 and 9'-3"c-¢for:©5 Type 4 retcining walls).For walls adjacent to side-
i N o No Scale walks or curbs,provide 4"casi iron or asbestos cement }!
pipe under the sidewalk to discharge through curb face.g| Exposed wall drains shall be located 3"%above finishedgrade. i!1-6"4 @ 2-6"=0-0"1'-6"¢Abut Brg B.Geocomposite drain,cement ireaied permeable base,and !®4 3"@ slotied plastic pipe continuous behind retaining|6-6"!6-6"\¥¥wall or abutment.Cop ends of pipe.Provide "lee"|ha ole df #Jl @ 5 (cutoff alternate bars conneclion af each 4"@ drain.|13-0"2'-3"10"-0"above top of fig)C.Connect the low end of plastic pipe to the main ouijeti-ol =pipe as applicable..XX 0 06 See Note @ D.Geocomposite Drain to be piaced behind|46 12-0"@ 10 [45 0 12 retaining walls (typ).!x -SECTION F-F _usur 1)—————(PF :i~/o Lge a"+1/4|gr =/Oo" ,i A ty oY “~re
i
A A 2 2 2 x 2 2X 2 2 2 A A \-a N
—|
|/0 rr :C CORRECT!rg gy JR HANNIGAN 850-13 -“Tf Exponded PolystyreneOptionalKey|3 1 My 5 ——+i 2-07]z-0]]!CURHRACT ¢0 7 A 188074 \/3-2/]Qi!|“a NOTE:KEY Vos pLibinATED 2/23/94 /K »!xX .DUE TO Ed SACK ’re v rr wove =Exp it filler i ~uitment sear |For loyout of reinf adjacent 7-6 7-6 Tm tL Ce 4 J ’TN ¥a!to const joint,see Detail X Scurey)Co16 =:Jer on =@ FRS 4/19/94 13 —\on "Abut 3 Loyout”sheet.=Note :=a= i
jos)
—
Ed
|I
Except as noted,see Section F-F 86-2]vo!SECTION G-6G (ABUT 3)for detaile not shown.|——|n=or BACKWALL.BASE DETAIL! ’No Scole|
PR ug ——;DESIGN BY Tracy Vacura CHECKED MJ Cullen STATE OF BRIDGE NO.

I
i
i
i
I
}
i

06/09/2026 C5 84 of 422

0S 0SO 2139 (CADD 4/83)

GiST.

TOTAL PROJECT SHEETS
COUNTY |ROUTE |POST MILES |SrEET I 70TAL
i |

ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHESFORREDUCEDPLANS
—

_6-9"33-0"Type |Ret Wall nl so |78 |s7nzz 202 261 |r_oo 7-6L 1 7)7 77 |I<30 Oo Type /Ret Wall ole 2 o *%J g'-0"v_rr”g'-”a -0"J os (,i :rp.gon 8-0"5 i ¢Brg Abut I 7 H:22 H:16 |H:12 T H:6 REGISTERED ENGINEER -CIVIL iEtenSn1 .H:8 T H:14 T H:18 1 )
ee
111
ve:A)|Hi fod 12-3-90©Z2 1 a PLANS APPROVAL DATE—'11 \3-2/ ;!Ii 60-3)i7|!|2)i[1(60-3\HI <0)i Note:i3-4 ~A 2 ||This special detail (reinf marked thusly %)id ©ih SL,.ervades dowels for Type 254 cn Sheet No.;i Q .il E11-53,page No.13]of Stondard Plans ,i =ih dated January,[9868.iHy :

I It “
4 \:Nt {#5 |@ I5 ¥
SPECIAL DETAILQ:iJ:;#5 NL @ 30 a :A #a Ty @ 6 ,SOUTH WALL NORTH WALL #5 Cont ‘LL 4 .7 Hordboord -smooth .4 #4 Tot .(side towards stub wallABUTMENT|RET WALL B3oN (65)L\ rr ’re *z —(T £-2)-"Gi 7 :i =/'-0 NA Motch deck /|Apmroceh Type N(30S)©overhong —i 1 77 77 77rr
.-:
40-0"Type |Ret Wall 9-43"gn PE~T 7 —¢Brg Abut 3 N T\Geocomposi te Drain ;’re ’rr y or v ”w ’”1 r_QqQr v_ry i
8-0",8-0 oe 80 ole 870"|87-0"|k¥79.36-07 Type |Ret Wall =#4 ©18—]dlH:10 |H:l4 H:18 H:24 |H:28 T—t9—e 9 |~<A)*¥%|8-0"g-o"8-0",2-0"tee 12 extend —T}1149 @ 12 extend |-H:24 H:20 H:l4 H:10 ‘nto Tig Ng—into fig !fr He yor]!Hi x leo]Ret Wall batter !(60-3)a 30©1 !||HT a SECTION A-A i|8|||\3-2/Sr=yr_on |(60-3)11 od |\3-4/st |!~d)||(60-3)iIaIl©:|Hi o,=~||i- iulHiXkPlaceConcreteBorrierdowe!s af half the !i spacing shown on "Section A-A"in this area only. {.;’
i
|v
iA;
t |vNORTHWALL ¥SOUTH WALL CEC sek 2 HANNSAN |
|wonTRACY,//I880 72 iABUTMENT3RETWALL(63-0)(63-8).Zragree o- 3 vo.v 144
Te ”Cn :“on
"=0 AY
FRS 2/19/94 i
iTo--ov PY ETN So To STATE OF BRIJGE_NO.DESIGN _Tracy Vocura 7-90 ___MJ Cullen 7-90 CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF STRUCTURES 57-402 SYCAMORE AVENUE uC _REPLACE | DETAILS K.Endow 7-80 MJ Cullen 7-90 -1 1 POST MILE iWNTTES[i Fong 7:90 |b.tog ran 7-00 |

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
|
=UC TURE DESIGN 9.08 RETAINING WALL DETAILS
CU ||EA 18907! OISREGARD PRINTS BEARINGEARLIERREVISIONDATES pm 3.04517 REVISION SATES (PACLIVINARY STARE ONLY) g [256 [5.0 |8 17

06/09/2026 C5 85 of 422

—————AAS

oist.!county ROUTE |POST MILES EET TOTAL |¢RTE 78 Line CEPR ae sEErs)|—ni sp |5.7122 203 26 ;78 /ly Ce <//REGISTERED ENGINEER -CIVIL GG
1 !¢
1-f--f-./
12-3-90

PLANS APPROVAL QATE

|
i
i
i
|
¢Bent /Etort of pitch when)\/weld is used io !
i ¢Brg.
}---anchor spiral unii ..i
|
J //Direction :[
///of weld
ii Fg §=m Ji
Te ——|
/~~1"x 10”«|-8"§=7 Be ~7 3i
/Elastomeric Brg Pad :vd,#5,&«8iLeftEdge
f=under each girder.Run off end of\!reinf.oniy
{of Deck
Place level similar bor as shown
/
JC 12"min/to Detoii A on "Abuf¥ 115"Details No.l"sheet.<lop lengthNote-Flore weld to be made in direction shown.WELDED LAP SPLICE AND ANCHOR Start of pifch when !clip is used to
Splice clip shown
Jexamale only
onchor spiral!unit N
os J 4f°
0 £5 #4,#5,&
for

Stage 2 &3 Construction @ Stage |Construction ®

(Stage 2 shown,Stage 4 similar)

0"
A
|+5 :3 (A ;inf.oni,st Column _S ¢Column st Column _S meiricalabout |Bor dia.(typ.)rein eniy i rr |or
:

AN Keys 12"x 13"over MECHANICAL LAP SPLICE :)50%of area ™’|!:—D AND ANCHORi= !—
==75%pen mis Direction|—45°J |@ N :i A 8 Ee Y —&<4 |#5 [U stirrup spacing eg ez |8e6 |e 2 lzeé6 |@ei2|1206 |e24|1206 |012|806 |2 2 |Run off end °N 7 #4,#5,&#5 ;:oi =a 3 teat =x —bar os shown.J ln reinf.only ;Place stirrups porallel _Main Col reinf to be full 2 5"lop bar ‘
1 #rd .oO a
4 -co:4 !°c gireers <~~height,no lap splices ®Stage 2 &4 bent cops to be cast 2 Bors veld te oe a )|i =oto cgoinel Siege 1 vent con,Ne or noite eT ion”1|OB B (including deck closure pour).4 FTR%hal be senlened on splice0 -,i i LN i
i
shown.i
*NN NS 3 Note:5.Lop bar equal size to spiral bor.;
:

For Section A-A,Section B-8,i
;+=&Footing Plan,see "BENT VEE GROOVE WEL DED SPL ICE j i I DETAILS NO.2"sheet.1 lS v
:
i
|
f=©
;
,JL ]—=I=Jd
.~Seme size,spocing &:
;0 O 6 "Max ||©NO AS BUILT CHANGES cP motericel as spire!:iy =Lom Pu T \shown on plansTTTESL}tor J.P HANNIGAN 0 JtgTEacoventnLRHANNS |,Ny aa:=ea Neyo tet 11 .11-1890 74 Individual hoops,made continuous with 3 I :-:ea way :.coNIRalyy TL TERT ee 100%penetrction welds,moy be substitutedSin)IE .".:2/23/94 B for spircls.J —;Coe ’CL|5 r #/18/94 BUTT WELDED CONTINUOUS HOOP:#5 L C 12 Max,all around ::column -hock cuter bars
:
i
*
:ELEVATION 15 (0)_trernorive Stirruns BAR SPIRAL SPLICE &SPIRAL ANCHOR AND HOOP DETAIL_—within column areo. ir=-0"'
:

TT Tracy V 7-90 |“MJ Cullen 7-90]STATE OF ES /|Tracy Veer ~~CALIFORNIA |ouvision of stauctures s7-«02 |
SYCAMORE AVENUE UC -REPLACE |DETAILS K.Endow 7-90 MJ Cullen 7-90 !:STRUCTURE DESIG i {FOAL MIE TOUANTITIESLaiFong7-90 CHEE Haglan 7-90 |
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N 8.08 BENT DE AILS NO.|:0S 030 2139 (CADDO 4/89)ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHES !|!|to CU 11 DISREGARD PRIITS BEARING SEVISON ON L8 PRCCIVIVAY STASE Shiv EEFORREDUCEDPLANS023EA189071EARLIERREVISIONDATESoo gu
Zl]anne 9 17 |

06/09/2026 C5 86 of 422

C
T
ee ————a my

NN
i#7 ™\C 6&6",Tot.2 /girder(Interior girder,tage-1,2,3)4 SECTION A-A

Sr _r ”[Proce horizontally =1"-0 Ls¢Column :Jr phe ;
;
See "Key Detail”:©;
—
om eZ ;
|mr
N\-
/La os”
i
i
~15"x 2'-1"Square <ea i||N FULL LENGTH SPLICE
vepressed Key :
:
[a -.Caen 10"014.ny :
i
cn “ho.cme |”#4 O spiral NL ©i€8"Pitch .;i
i
A 2 =i
i
:,N :|¢Bent KEE *%:€Bent =|i
i
;lor oD Lr $N SE |
||
vo.:/:um Oo
i ;|:!’;::
5 RRR?oT !~+~SNK BY
|°a/2 :1 PU #10 L_Tot.4 (Hinge reinf.)1 5 5 ||||V \_~|i:
:!!©¢Coivmn S|ra Exp.Ji.Filler i
|PLAN SIDE VIEW lee
|
ser
|
36m
|
1-6"Cee ||i —
~Lal [a 5
5 :
-o-oo"PEBe v0 E_upHanviean KEY DETAIL|WELDED BAR ANCHOR DETAIL FOOTING PLAN ncn se hRH —:3"=17-0"5 ener 1189074 aslo:5 =1"=-0"SoeaERACT .od | :
2 2 Lee g«—2/FRS 4/19/941
i
i
:
i 1 Toe.NECN _STATE OF To BRIDGE NO.:
|—
|
_Trocy Vacuro 780
|
77M)Culien 7-90 CALIFORNIA |Cuvision oF stauctures s-s02 |
SYCAMORE AVENUE UC -REPLACEDETAILSK.Endow 7-90 MJ Cullen 7-90 i 1 POST MILEousntities||gi Fong 7-90 “EYED.Haglan 7-90 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STRUCTURE DESIGN 9.0g B E N T D E T A I L S N 0 :2 :

RA moval A AT HT EAA NAA on
CT
———PTR Ea
4 0S GSD 2139 (CADD 4/89)
oRtGINAL SCALE IN INCHES I [i TT |CU 11 DISREGARD PRINTS BEARING BEVISION DAVES [e0gjuivany STASE Civ)upg i geORRECUCEDPLANSo\2 5 EA 18907]EATLIER REVISION OATES am |

7.0451 2.2-30-00 ||||10 |17 !
ee ee __

06/09/2026 C5 87 of 422

:
21ST]COTY |ROUTE |co0T ate,[EEE TOTAL37-85"©31-0"©37-94";.:oTaL PRCJEC NG.==to oa ole —i SD I 78 |5.7512.2 |205;26lStage2ConstStage|Const Stage 4 Const !at :WS Cd ||¢Rte 78 /7 Lal {,}; ;:

REGISTERED ENGINEER -CIVIL i
i v_”57-0"!rer Je ve ;
|/7 -57-0 I:|
:|See Detail "A"Profile Grade .g
12-3-90 ;;PLANS APPROVAL GATE |yl

i
|
Is (@ Concrete Barrier Type 25
5 |

—|Temporary Railing {Type K)’
..“Normal dimension @ ¢Brg.
|J TYPICAL SECTION 9 ==

re i \_
Exponded Meio!Leih
=/*o”
#5 S 12 60-5)(60-5)Diamond Mesh,2.5 E/SSY min.yd TN or \5-1/

ALTERNATIVE DECK CONSTRUCTION JOINT
=16

Place parallel to €Bent
I"-4"1-4#4 cont rot 3 |N
i
|
i
|
]
|
i
|
{
|
I
|
i
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
|
»|Nwen
TU
AY B i (60-5)5 aT -—:Ny A 4 ——t v7 wR 31
|
|
I
|
!
|
i
i
i|
|
i
|
i
i
|
{
i
i
|
{
!
i
|
i
|
|
|

TEMPORARY RAILING(TYPE K)
PL WASHER -BAR 25 :/2 x Omsm

cir x .J -

#+L5conttot3_va toil 3
#4 ©@ 18 max lapped with .”fot 4
#5 foi)4 #10 cont,tot 2 per girder

3 5#10 in bent area ’”#5 tot 4 |io 10 #5 tot 4
C1)|20 DRILL &BOND 1”&RODLl(1 N THEEADZD FULL LENGTH,:WITH NUT -TOT 4 ===:TYPICAL 6'-98"BAY TYPICAL 5'-54"TYPICAL 6-22"BAY Fy bs PANEL*"FS ” :5 ©28 lax oee NT PART TYPICAL SECTION TEMPORARY RAILING ATTACHMENT DETAILS |—_A 2. :TYP TPS Le =jroo”(This Detail required on Siruciure only):
77 L-o!10]L_Wf 2

EXTERIOR GIRDER INTERIOR GIRDER
:\.cco #20 /=DeriDetails sym.cboi:t !=
S
=78"Line.
7 !,
Faolsework Releoxe:
/:\,Falsework shallN\not be réleased less than
Lo Cir.:28 days ofter thw last concrete has been
Orill &Bond #6 Dowels 7S :placed.Closure pur/shall not be placed @ 48 sitoggered
ilternative2isused,
|{
sooner thon 14 doy
hos been releosed
after the falsework
When Fcolsework

camber volues es those shown.:}h ,\d :Lo I©SEL cco 6 ETE \A /i|CLOSURE POUR CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE PLACED le Reel No Nol le .UNTIL 15 DAYS AFTER ADJACENT DECK POURS pg|ARE COMPLETE.van gooHANNIGAN |
Nema /7-189C 74 -DETAIL "A "i
co 2/23/8+#:—eee meme —a _FRS 4/19/94!oY CHECKED BRIOGE NO.’:
|adi _Trocy Vacurs MW Cullen STATE OF DIVISION OF STRUCTURES .[57.402 |
SYCAMORE AVENUE UNDERCROSSING;CETAILS Rich Kuroko 7-90 MJ Cullen CALIFORNIA

POST WILE .—~ouanTiTiEs [*7 Lo Fong TE ormis Hogtan
|

DEPARTHENT OF TRANSPORTATION
|
©1 UC TURE DESIGN 11 2.08 TYPICAL SECTION
%T 7 7EA18007]EARLIER REV(SION DATES
oo
gu
|
J.0 7800 i |i

06/09/2026 C5 88 of 422

¢€Brg Abuf
¢Girder

¢Bent

v 23-0"v 15-0"\
\fr vo \’SY,w_18-0 20-0\\=\#10 Tot.8 Typical Bay,Tot.15 Closure
Tot.2
Typicoi
Pour Bay,
#10
(60-5)XY NY
Tot.5 LONGIT REINF

#10 cont.,Tot.2
¢Girder
¢Bay
¢Girder
¢Girder

r=yr-0n
\e €Ben

t 2
ge
¢Brg Abui 3([
\

1 \ii -
\Edge of deckTTTAg.a ¢Girder

A-—-\113

OIST|COTY
|
Rowe |OST MLETTSEET oo):Sli LLY hal A |:I I :||sp 78 |57022 |206]26 ii®iid AIAIF |A i)AA :. iREGISTEREDENGINEER-CIVIL
12-3-90

PLANS APPROVAL DATE

0 |\Vo ©BENT2 Ww --—-—\-2 z =:AE RTE 78 AY \¢ABUT 3 BRG¢Rte 78 ©}NI WW \Tt 13 >====To —0A0|TCT —Lh -©—%=X ----=-—3 —~=A \ C -1 AH J -4 t===—aVy\“Reference Line \\\\Reference [ine-ty -—F)¢ABUT |BRG \\\Span |\\Span _2 AN \\¢RTE 78 ©)—-He tes:--===aS ==z :==-.a)]OT DN 0 -©}px —py:——===3%———A Reference Line drawn between pointsAW]i \\1 4 -—F)orn eesection at €Abuts &¢€Ben:|©-=|\t 3 =——==En -—(F)Span |Reference Line Brg =SS 39°07'08 £\\\\:(Typ girder brg for Span I):®)-==int ===~~=u \a===——=ST to -—@®Span 2 Reference Line Brg =S 37°35'48"=&\\)\\\\\A \
|(Typ girder brg for Span 2)&—-ee =)==========-\:
=—1 _iTeTsYhr—B -Sh -5 ======H =z ==\|==to -I WW 1 roB—-==TH -0 -=Es --~-_\\|\\4 REN 0 \—C NO AS BUILT CHANGES |
|@—-==TH =Te ~=obi ======-TreeRneee\ei LAN J Meee HE -©)Ca hd dnd :BY Int Dioph =Voy ee -NEdgeofdeckcSpantop©\¢Brg €Int Diaph =\TCE Se LAR TANNIGAl€Span fe :Sem 112189074 |GIRDER LAYOUT Ce 2/23/04 |I"=jo TRS 4/19/94 :
|
-——pr ——————————mcm —
iBYCHECKEDAFBRIDGENO..DESIGN _Tracy Vacura a MJ Cullen STATE 0 DIVISION OF STRUCTURES 57-402 SYCAMORE AVENUE UC -REPLACE :DETAILS Rich Kuroko 7-90 MJ Cullen CALIFORNIA STRUCTURE DESIGN 11 POST VILEQUANTITIES||5 Fong ““*Dennis Hoglan |
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 9.08 GIRDER LAYOUT0SOSC2138(CADD 4/89) POR RECESS EAlN INCHES .T TTTwi DLIREoARD PRINTS Sine -—REVISIGN CATES HE EEE TS =EE ee TTRateNlawta 06/09/2026 C5 89 of 422

|i
||
—Small spcce permitted
within group.

-BE

CLEARANCES FOR PRETENSIONED STRANDS

{.Strands may Se bundled in:groups consisting of 3 vertically and 2 UTRTRSTARLEITIITIA MEAREAAAS TY US a LT RT UL aARR
TT

WS TR A EER KLAR RTSLEA

T.horizontally,and separated of the ends cco #9

2.The min.distance 5”between groups or individual strands is 172"for 3g"strands,194"for jg’strands and 2"for 1%"sirands./

3."S’/s measured between centers of adjacent strands.

4.Approval of the Engineer Is required for deviation /
6-0"

C2 me wr re rem maamme—,Pe es ni ot mrt my name ov ewgone aman w ae or nm we ooPSRSEEEex fut
opt gd brig i ce wr grrreet A a STE ET LAT LTT IU ITT TE em TY LET L LS I Tne my =Se2-5 =nofched
end only
-\o—End of girder .
2-9 rd notched end only A4-H0x 76"1

q :3,depth7dep 3=rJos =o girder #52

*OWelded bar anchor 0 BEBE

tall gol 4a 50

DETAIL E Co re—BF 5

NOTCHED END

©£Span—~—___4 :Path of center of gravity of prestressing A Oimensicn =20"

2"...—PPE.Construction joint between girder steel fo approximate a parabola.Tolerance =2-6 Co N ©»E>:Cs (on deck os’g !There shall be a min.of 2 hold downs within the oonL | lJ \i—_—11 !—A !|:/foo ==e =|i 288@&L ;:Xl Hi.ts ell .>/sy |Ses7 |Serz -3 SEE TABLE /’"FY“bolt i for J|———ED"=tall exterior girder.See’inseri Assembly Detail “6 E>Cr [a biackout 7 required for restrainer ELEVATION.

units see "Restrainer Unit Type 5-Precast cco #4/_——Grroers shee!_o ruery stirrup yr ©EVERY STIRRUP4cont“4 x PEPE = IY \10/3 i |EILAT“5 with 20 |‘of|:

IN sties #9 ~1no=crosstie max.I Msg cor
=a IN =“4 jot.6

oa
T
T

“gz L/0-0 —a=re|CLfol6—==7 “3 cont Co Cogn 670Ano
|
—6 _/
—/|onro or U with "aM
oj iT Ul crossties @ 9 max.|]|rh NH x 7086"
I I 9g”i :Id|“mr ||oe max.
|IN 49,see‘-1 4 1 .2,ety ie|“vera E"
/-7 5 |

SECTION B-8B &@,:For 6-0"@ Akhut end.

1"?bolt»3"
/min.Jil \
Se "malleable iron\:or steel hex nut
#68 x 4-0"dowels placed

INSERT ASSEMBLY DETAIL D

#4 cont
4x I'4 alas #4 tot 3 per stirrup
SY,—_of "=7 ,rot.5
/"Oy

H
e
B
’3

1 —#4 cont|Id so”
b of—*6 Z3,tot.3

2,7

through 1%"?holes formed
in girder,when diaphragm
1s continuous.Holes needVanolbegrouted.x fri

|z ET ==Be _
L Co >"8 dowel ~|]J ®#0)510.|3900
|
4/00 |0.:%ossq7207"1607 560 3500
|
4600
|

0.0 |
858 |;2 ®20]470 3500 [4000
|

0.05 |
652
|
||1-7"eo]s20 3500
|
4500
|

0.09 |
CCO *I3

CHANGES
5Mon
Ba
SA
V
E
WT
Bar
Ta
g
20TE
R
A
M
a
t
t

STANDARD DRAWING Revised dimension Revised reinforcement State of °DIVISION OF STRUCTURES LE ve.——FILE No AXS~-i2-36 DESIGN Poy 57 Pi 15 iin hin f Checked _ot Approval me By .@ =STRUCTURE DESIGN 57-402 i SYCAM ORE AV ENUE UC -REPLACESRAWIN|oevaics CBee Piha }|Checked 7777 Were ot 7 ll g’Added reinforcement Q CAL FO R N 1A dd CI RulBe“REVISED soos 0 —7 7 lo Z ER 200 (3 Revised detail <©Revised note __|DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ig)er 1 9.08 PRESIR ESSED I GIRDE3 NO.|“50 0 141 ’.|ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHES |To |TT BE “cu I ”LL Co oo Totes ovouttet vias ant cee ol ee ooFORREDUCEDPLANSoy3 |
EA 183071 jo CSN DAR DENIS SATE Teo Gites yr [1a 17
-me,3

06/09/2026 C5 90 of 422

CLEARANCES FOR PRETENSIONED STRANDS
horizontally,ond separated al the ends.
—Hr

l.Strands may be Lundled in groups consisting of 3 vertically and 2

3.5 Is measured between cenfers of adjacent strands.

Small space permitted
within group.275
a
rt “notched4:0

2.The min.distance 'S"between groups or individual strands is [15"for Yg"stronds,192"for 4g"strands and 2"for 15"strands.

4.Approval of the Engineer s required for deviation.

DETAIL E

CCO *9 —
/]7"SN
3 3
J es =
~——E£nd of girder2-9 7 notched «2d only
in
!
Va #O0x 7-6"
a depth .
of girder #5@18
Hall ANY)Hall 5,=
Girder end block
*1OWelded bar anchor >==Ny
“9 «3
Dy 10"
~

TO {Yr FEF
tilfo|tfc Fs5upe
|
i Lal&T NOTCHED END

DT Poded |/
i

Girders"sheet
For blockout if required for restrainer"units see "Resitrainer Unit Type 5-Frecast

SECTION A-4

SECTION B-B &@

PN
C
H
I
T
E
1"?bolt x 3" /“malleable iron
or steel!hex nut
TR
E
To
n
e
s
, INSERT ASSEMBLY DETAIL
For 6-0"@ Abut end.

i“cont__ag *1°4"E42 @ EVERY STIRRUP ee :NS Pas Eg :0!7 oA G i |~~,cont :ae 0]=5 com |pe 6 a i y At on!ps NCH “
“GN EG,i i TH artol.4 ct end dN 6 TT 1]=|etigee 2/tWESi_J

tax [4 "BF @FyiRy STIRY,p #40,tot 3 per stirrup
er WU.ror 5-

1 LFILE
[7"

#6 E9 jor.3
|=Pa cont
pl|Weg tor.2sda“2uAl ©»(no deck wo”g Ttere shall be a min.of 2 hold downs within the eon.IF }. =!:
|||
.\3 r/rE :ies[1Teyrez|_XL h /los a=#telloo .end.3%J |5 yo EE ee,*5@/8 .0 SEE TABLE "xf0 “bolt required for wr)em BT ||L"=Pte exterior girder.See"lnsert Assembly DetailerErCrELEVATION #6 between girders ~5 x6.0"6 12

“8 dowel
STANDARD DRAWING -TT D Revised dimension @ Revised reinforcement State of DIVISION OF STRUCTURES -a

0 End may be sloped
Jos.required.
/33%"keys b 12"ctrs.
"A See Detail £°
Seresos g N
BateSoi
LToeEn SeeT
|Tar Tome TeOIST|COUNTY |ROUTE |Eo Padiacy i3 etry

ti sp |78 |sez |208 26!
2 LWoeGe
=oC:SHU EMGRIEZR
NEY12-3-90 EZ]-'zTANGRSSESULSATEi-[IPLANSASSRGUATATE£1s 2221-9 J ~Q ~~|PRESTRESSING NOTES

Working Force :The force required af cenisr of $266ofteralllosses. 7ConcreteStrength:Fi Is af ime of initio Siressing,
itis at 28 deys,psi.

Comber:Girder soffit is to be cast DArebone with soiusshownasordinareat&spon.

Screed line slevalicns for deck concrete wili seaeterminedbytheEngineer.

Coniracior may interpolate P and "X"voives oeiwesnlimitsshown,as Goproves Sy the Snginssr.

A
R
A
I
A
T
H
r
i
s
eet
R
E
I
T
AN
A
©mr
”
i0
58 AR
E
R
R
E S38 Tia
eeETE deFlowmedBesptGe
croaect pr JR HANNIGAN
11-1890 74

oe 2/23/94
FRS 4/19]94
NOTE :

Details shown are for Pretensioned Girders.The Contractor may submit details for PosttensioningwhichshallbesubjecttotheapprovaloftheEngineer k 78 dowels to be placed parallel foEndandIn;ferme tliatre Draparagms.

All diaphragms placed paralleltoLunt.

SPECIAL DETAIL

A
RI
RSA
SR
HaTS SETSUITERATS SSR PH Up pratanan=SYCAMORE AVENUE UC -REPL ACE

||
|
i
COMIRALY CT A |
|
|||

L rig me.NS -12 -36 i DESIGN ib 5 Vv 14.4 .herr |Checked B27 )|Appreyval rem By .a STRUJCTURE DE-SIGN |]57 -402 1 ee >0 j=[7pyos TT eee ,Zi&LtdI Added reinforcement Relete Table CAL [EQ BHVIA pr CL Seebore"REVISED [Lipsy Ti hg \NEY I Revised detail 6>Revised note DEPARTWENT OF TRANSPORTATION |“27 ‘ellen—[7 0 |PRESTRESSE D I GIRDER NO.2boweroem,poe wn TU STMIHNIIETS OES TT FE TET URE OB Te us ew rTme *3 os p tn EeREN Fond Ta TT SRC SSSRRANTALINS OS Lm aTRRE3MRT RT
XS aSReATTTrsTTTNETPEreroer SER TLa ~~TE ee TRANS SATA,TTSTFTITe Tom omv ITTET TORTIE ND,BL meee ||ORIGINAL SCALE IH.INCHES |!cu Distegard print bearing CANIC FCVISIOD (AICS mmemmmamen pe aliSee or:Cee -il or ? -i |FOR REDUCED PLANS 0 i 2 3 EA 18907]SUG |ARNG cases @ ||12

ca
.
06/09/2026 C5 91 of 422

ry |-POST MILES SHEET TOTALo1st.]county ROUTE TOTAL,PROG:ThEET TOTAL

Porallel to face of paving [:End of "=

i
{
i
i SD 78 5.7012.2 209 2sl
|
{
!i

°A A.Py ~notch for skews up to 10°Cp End of wingwall \PProGe TI)-CollJ\:I REGISTERED ENGINEER -CIVILApproachPovement-\5 'tw :7 >i gl.3oaeerJ57To:N\CT ”C 33 12-3-90 5SlFrontfacealiatll/5S 30-0"min \}gl :PLANS APPROVAL DATE } !i
TH ”
NS
No Scale
:
ma ~¥

.V4 77 7 77
NG 1/4"hardboard between slob ondwingwoll,with smooth side {sword wing wall, /
-30-0"ol /we if required corer BarrierNORMAL
Fp FEPLAN1-00)1-0,>min.

———— ————————
i
ii
b"borsi=10 #5 contSealedjoint#4 tot 5 tot 4 ~Sa
.
,Blockout for|™(#4 contior2 en Assembly Hatch deck :
|2g”\vr verhong ES:Ca
i I -./o )~~.#4 cont
{yz @ PT \/1/4"exp. 6 2"
|||a.1 Bockwoll —_Ny j A
R

1-
2 "

1/4"exp.}
#5 x 2-0"@ 12 _Jt.filler Geocomposite

4 /

Drain Retaining Wall
TYPE £-2 pts amr A -1590 74 —i
—_—
-TYPE £—1 _—DrYEALT OU ,
:BAR CHAIR DETAIL 27 Backwall -|—SECTION C-C ce 2/23/92 :
|FT
.Cen
i =1-0
3/4"=1'=0"~Concrete Barrier FRS 2/19/94TypeE-1 to be used unless otherwise shown on iype0beuse i ABUTMENT TIE DETAILS (SEE NOTE 1)usedunlessoh ~3 = .See Road Plans™77 77 77 7 7 ”7 ””7”I.For details not shown or noted,“Abutment”deloil Project Plo:| |Geocomposite “pee 1 1 Ny [Coo ax !orn or noted,see Abuiment”details on Project Plans.! i Or 7TTN

2.Approach slabs to skewed structures shall be slaggered ot lane lines.Staggered lines ; }|~£"0"}may be 24"or 36°oporl for skews of 45°or less ond agi eachione line fr skews I NN Y #4 bar choirs @3-5
greoler than 45°|
Nn ronsversely onSlongitudinally.

J.For drainage details,see "Structure Approach Drai Details”sheet.:
i P 2 J 3"slotted plastic Approach Slab transverse reinforcement I pp wnege Jelols | |1 Filter Fobric ;pipe (see note 3.)may be placed parallel lo paving notch 4.Longitudinal Construction Joints sholl be locoted on lone lines when permified |
for skews

POST MILE
DRAWING DETAILS 2 syrervidon
)S RUCTUR DESIGN |]ST
|WE"07/88 font PFA seanto DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION |=4.08 STRUCTURE APPROACH TYPE N(30)S |]—— :—Ha 1 I )FEVISION BAILS {PALLIVIVAQY STAGE ONLY}sueer |or | |oo mo |SHEE oes |!!Leu Ert

06/09/2026 C5 92 of 422

i
|:.1 er 1 POST Mil $SHIET 4 TOTAL|A oll DiST.]COUNTY |ROUTE |rt ober CD,loteTsOutlets,see Rood Plans 5 nd of et.a i SD 78 5.71122 :210 |6 |Limits of Geocomposite Drain —:|Toe of Slope Below (hished 5A md Agrade(Typ .Ls4f*—End of Approach Stab REGISTERED En |=;
1 }/.A .aN E .Eas A :\|
2 ,bY pg Wingwall JGeocomposite N Geocomposite i 12-3-90 :~ope .ADrain —Droin —|-3-:@ .BAS AN a PLANS APPROVAL DATE :|>~~:x Ch | n F Cap End "5 Ein )|
L For Outlet elev.,To :,o —.see "Road Plans”.:Co Drainage |;o .ye SOON Ne Pad -=,!AS Structur .w &I"-0 ]Nps 7 to/ror Qutiet elev.,!2 -e "ole Ro A see "Rood Plans”.|2 /pproach :5 —_—_No SN —A 5 1Q Sidewalk ercii.o —|Geocomposite :>|=5 Drain :a >3 SECTION F-F|3 -:QQ To SECTION G-G|~AER ;Q 7'=1"-0 |~"1 ’er51;lez -0 ;0 y a A eessasiiiioiy——-¥
i .|Lu Retaining Wall ~—
!See Detail "A"!|E Geocomposiie Oroin !i
i
i

Seocomposite |)~
TYPICAL PLAN [I [wereType£-2 Ecge

Ne |Deici!shown:]1"=10"Se -Note:/J /now
|a Bends &junctions 4 a SUE!cL in 3”plostic pipe f ol i.j are 30"rodius min.R%:4 Co :|.2 i :ANC Filter yo :
i ..>A i iTPB—H fabric HE :|Li.L-TPB .>NU oo :PR
Geocomposite II 9 |.~—_—3"Plastic Pipe 3"Plostic Pipe iDrain|Le /7 (Dr \(Unslotted)(Unsiotted)1}!|Face of Abut.La A ¥i IF 3"Plastic Pipe 3 ,1 (Slotted)§i :!Ley (_":::il 3"Plastic Pipe 3 Plostic Pipe |2 (Slotted)(Siotied)For Qutie?,see !|."Rood FPiagns™.:|f-4 an o i |<—

Droinage Pad —_—i(Minor Conc.)———3"Plastic Pipe Ng Dreinage PagForOutlet,see (Unslotted)

"Rood FPlons’
NL a SS ABUTMENT DRAINAGE DETAIL

]"=f"
x2RetainingWall=:i
¥.i
/L i.i
Nl

DETAIL "A"
EEE SECTION E-£:~=7
MCP Cige’FE i
I=-0"-«or SP HANINISANorfeapral
[1-18907% _

2/22)3+
TT /[os £1894

NO AS BUILT CHANGES
|-N ay «a CHECKED v BRIDGE NO.|=Voc.r ~~Collen STATE OF DIVISION OF STRUCTURES 57.402 SYCAMORE AVENUE UC (REPLACE) DETAILS Dale Kubochi 8-90 Collen CALIFORNIA
,ouantiTiEs ®"crecxeo

|For TR DEPARTMENT OF TRaNsPoRTaTION |Ho TURE DESIGN if “sos STRUCTURE APPROACH DRAINAGE DETAILS :DS 0S 2135 (CADD </B9)oo ORIGINAL SCALE IN INCHES Cu I 1 DISREGARD PRINTS BEARING BEVISIoY acs (oar wines Soa Dv seer |oeA:i !FOR REDUCED PLANS °EA 189071 ARLIER REVISION DATES cori =!!|:ilo 17 ma wh ow mem XS me ee ie wen eee sen mes Mem ES Men ae en mi wm 06/09/2026 C5 93 of 422

POSTMILES |SHEET TOTAL

ii;
!.3}
DIST.|COUNTY
|
ROUTE
|
torapROJECT NO.
|
SHEETS ;
Z 22 8253i:ETT n|so 78 s7nzz
|
21 |
ze :s5:z 2
-!
HH:Ee BENCH MARK |ov
A———trimerrere
eter,
SAA———
iss wi]£3 /£52 i ol i Lev L Abut {LAbut 3 400.00 yoo :Rao 2 TBM EV.420.91 MLC
Coin
732
o £83 i ,405.00 CERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST W.C.CAIN i 8 GE Ez Spot elev.at fog line and paving notch on East end .No.2497 i:5 a8 34 of Bridgs No.57-0402R._Agi0.00}CeAmeED3?So £wf £2 i
528%3 52gbise3
12-3-90
stg?s w 2
i
ES ~$|.1]B-3 392.00 PLANS APPROVAL DATE 1Ho,®EEse :—#1505I409.00 STA.51:32.37 ¢RTE.78:2 ,STA.9+94.99 &PROP.SYCAMORE AVE.i.404.00 \|= N 2005753.693
i
g 392.00 :TE6266486.418
\
°!iQ g 2 wd)
:
!
|5 &z
i
N oe B-6 .

UoaE0T le
-NEE ¢rTETS
|
BS A |lun 5 siz |2 8 eC
513
$1 83§52 .3 :
tp 255%sf g8sis
|38 Sx¥az
B-7 |z
i
Q [394.00]i ;
E _394.00 |—y .!3 £25 Si?
322.00]:fal il \PLAN !LE 2 \al5CH]A B.4 |NO AS BUILT CHANGES" =
20 !Q &£2 £5
C i]Wu Ra nm co oe i
d im|de.|3 AE mE |w @ 313 ZL 5 3 J
|
FUN wd ed id Vd,4 i
—en C2 xz
—.!
=:3 5 409.00 J
410.00 ]SoweeCT;os gy J.FE HANNIGAN 1
2g!i :—_—i
i A |[F0%-09]#0500]amact +//7/8907%|35ia%i=5 2 899.00 900.00 {w_2/23/94 Nn 1])FEIT ES iz 395.00 FRS 4/19/54,|:®2 Ze i 82 52 +
ad 358 $5 se
&1g
.1gE2§os
td :

Sa%ss 2.£3
Sf |430
Sf:§8 0A 430
=e !
iciys a8 4%of oo+R TNS.98 io
B 7 t
voge301].:g z
-!
g FN 8 8%
4220 |T=|30 \/E 4.20
Le Ten JE LLSi compoct to 420 |Heo 8f g &3 or 7 permanent [|“dense,brown io greenish-1 (3 5 5 }=°*ao 2 Emer brown,fine to cocrse SAND i
TH 2 °
BE
N-S ©x =~~with occosiona!BOULDERS i
-2 x a oS wv of and SILT,signtly moist to 1
w +-wn 1 00 .-L
§_2 8s 410 3 ©3 S ors I»2 ®8]moist,poorly sorted.410 :
gg.J >2 S|wi n -+4 oF
EH EINES Gl =ow a APPROX.GROUND LINE SE Jw o 7]@pprogeh il.:
$3 ,80 ~0%Z33 9g],HE :of Zl uw i6 [1.8],Spifizgds &Sit al |=2 ALONG|&RTE.78 alo S|&=15 x =a a ——4 ..397.5 wee}1"pve -4 SANDY SILT to SANDY i 395.4 B S 396.2 pr 395.0 F713 396.1 i 395.6 B Dios]CLAY:slightly moist.soil.I «-=—113"7d 3 -pti ge 1 J gr 2%) ,1 fine SAND.3M)>4 fine-medium SAND.grained.highly weathered I Boy 2538 ixzs §5 A fine SAND |SILTY fine SHO.23 Bi]hy Slightly compact,brown le DIORITE.jointed and sheared.|3 #8 §#8 £8 3s [Z
11a 2 Slightly compact brown,LZ [1.4 ~:]Slightly compact,gray-Eh AN ’Decomposed 17 114 a SILTY fine SAND.

EE
TalSWS Ra28eS i IflNEE28fae]SILTY fine SAND.|green.SILTY fine SAND.Th]oS EE
Ties]QUARTZ-DIORITE. $e RRS D 3 CLAYEY,fine SAND.mS Dd poorly wi Compact,brown,SILTY nds PEBBLE—COBBLE GRAVEL °3%3%3 EE QUARTZ-DIORITE So g ~~]ond GRAVEL,occasional large PEBBLES.1-9-59 |fino SAND 25 LE Gf .' z >2 B70]J 5 -D7oTie T7-NTORT8g388s|S 2-114
359
Dacomposed ols 5 QUARTSTORIE.Compact to dense.!dark brown,SILTY 220.11.4 15]Decomposed QUARTZ-DIORITE.:8 G5 @&0 B0ab a 3 370 QUARTZ-DIORITE.Bs fine-medium SAND.Xd Weathered QUARTZ-DIORIT:370 | :P 2
JJE]NZ RS!2 2%J Decomposed QUARTZ-DIORITE.
|
n FE:
%Sed !
m™=53 1-7-59z@xx°s ©
4 -59 -8-59
2 |
§[8zz3pE
|
22 -8-1-7-59 =7—
:
8 5
|
f|z8azEz lezl 1360 180 7-59 360 |==o >£2<x &oO
i
J:—i ||PROFILEa22
|
5 [8.85.8
|
§3
Hor.1°=10’:
gp 2
|
|isgis gk 510+00 510+50 511+50 512+00 rm 512+50 |x 7 5 ~Z gs :ora :—::;
SRF 71%ER
|
ER fem ":.———repr rn “|BRIDGENO.
|
Co !
Ww,=
.2 =Ts w ENGINEERING GEOLOGY BRANCH -TRANSPORTATION LABORATORY State of Foor SYCAMORE AVENUE UNDERCROSSING (REPLACE )|s EER83sie 2 DRAWN BY FERNANDO J.ANDRES &VICTOR SESTOKAS 3/90 CALIFORNIA POST MLE LOG OF TEST BORINGS :
§lets TE ||DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 LU )_|PE ES ORIGINAL SC ALE IN INCHES |;::CU DISREGARD PRINTS BEARING REVISION DATES (PRELIMINARY STAGE ONLY}SHeet 1 Of |FOR REDUCED PLANS 0 !2 3 EA 18907]EARLIER REVISION DATES ————e fag |17 17 \ 1 TLE0ST REV 480 mtv ||
06/09/2026 C5 94 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 95 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 96 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 97 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 98 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 99 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 100 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 101 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 102 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 103 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 104 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 105 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 106 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 107 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 108 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 109 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 110 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 111 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 112 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 113 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 114 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 115 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 116 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 117 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 118 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 119 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 120 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 121 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 122 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 123 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 124 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 125 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 126 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 127 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 128 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 129 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 130 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 131 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 132 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 133 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 134 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 135 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 136 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 137 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 138 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 139 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 140 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 141 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 142 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 143 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 144 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 145 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 146 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 147 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 148 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 149 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 150 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 151 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 152 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 153 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 154 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 155 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 156 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 157 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 158 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 159 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 160 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 161 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 162 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 163 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 164 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 165 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 166 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 167 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 168 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 169 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 170 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 171 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 172 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 173 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 174 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 175 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 176 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 177 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 178 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 179 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 180 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 181 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 182 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 183 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 184 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 185 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 186 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 187 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 188 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 189 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 190 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 191 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 192 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 193 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 194 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 195 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 196 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 197 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 198 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 199 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 200 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 201 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 202 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 203 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 204 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 205 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 206 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 207 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 208 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 209 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 210 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 211 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 212 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 213 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 214 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 215 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 216 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 217 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 218 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 219 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 220 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 221 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 222 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 223 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 224 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 225 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 226 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 227 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 228 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 229 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 230 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 231 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 232 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 233 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 234 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 235 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 236 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 237 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 238 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 239 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 240 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 241 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 242 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 243 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 244 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 245 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 246 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 247 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 248 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 249 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 250 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 251 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 252 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 253 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 254 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 255 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 256 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 257 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 258 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 259 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 260 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 261 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 262 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 263 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 264 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 265 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 266 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 267 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 268 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 269 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 270 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 271 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 272 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 273 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 274 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 275 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 276 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 277 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 278 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 279 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 280 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 281 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 282 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 283 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 284 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 285 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 286 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 287 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 288 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 289 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 290 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 291 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 292 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 293 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 294 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 295 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 296 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 297 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 298 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 299 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 300 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 301 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 302 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 303 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 304 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 305 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 306 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 307 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 308 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 309 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 310 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 311 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 312 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 313 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 314 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 315 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 316 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 317 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 318 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 319 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 320 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 321 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 322 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 323 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 324 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 325 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 326 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 327 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 328 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 329 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 330 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 331 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 332 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 333 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 334 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 335 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 336 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 337 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 338 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 339 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 340 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 341 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 342 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 343 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 344 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 345 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 346 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 347 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 348 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 349 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 350 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 351 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 352 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 353 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 354 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 355 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 356 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 357 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 358 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 359 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 360 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 361 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 362 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 363 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 364 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 365 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 366 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 367 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 368 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 369 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 370 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 371 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 372 of 422

06/09/2026 C5 373 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit B

EXHIBIT B
CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL

06/09/2026 C5 374 of 422

SYCA
M
O
R
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

S
E
W
E
R

M
A
I
N
SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78

SEWER CAPACITY
IMPROVEMENTS CIP 8396

CITY OF VISTA AND

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT
March 30, 2026
06/09/2026 C5 375 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Table of Contents  i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Cover Letter..............................................................................................................................................ii

2. Company Information ............................................................................................................................1

3. Project Understanding and Approach ................................................................................................1

4. Detailed Scope of Services ....................................................................................................................4

5. Project Team and Organization Chart ..............................................................................................14

6. Experience ..............................................................................................................................................17

7. References ..............................................................................................................................................21

8. Hourly Rate Schedule ...........................................................................................................................21

9. Exceptions to the RFP ..........................................................................................................................21

10. Addenda to the RFP ............................................................................................................................21 Appendix: Resumes...................................................................................................................................22 Appendix: Addenda Acknowledgment ..................................................................................................33 06/09/2026 C5 376 of 422

1. Cover Letter  ii
Harris & Associates, Inc.
2375 Northside Drive, Suite 125
San Diego, CA 92108
619.481.5011  WeAreHarris.com
March 30, 2026
Jason Rivera, PE
Capital Projects Manager
City of Vista
200 Civic Center Drive
Vista, CA 92084-6275
Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Design Services for Sewer Capacity Improvements CIP-8396 Sycamore Avenue and Highway 78
Dear Evaluation Committee:

Harris & Associates (Harris) is pleased to submit our proposal to the City of Vista (City) and Buena Sanitation District (District) to provide professional engineering design services for the Sycamore Avenue and SR-78 Sewer Capacity Improvements Project (CIP 8396). This project represents a critical improvement identified in the City’s 2025 Sewer Master Plan to address hydraulic deficiencies and ensure long-term system reliability under peak wet-weather conditions.

Project Understanding and Approach. Harris has already conducted site visits and performed utility research along Sycamore Avenue and the SR-78 interchange to better understand the physical constraints, traffic operations, and existing infrastructure conditions. Based on these observations, we recognize that the primary challenges of this project extend beyond hydraulics and are centered on constructability within Caltrans right-of-way, traffic control at active freeway ramps, and minimizing bypass operations within a high-flow corridor.

A critical component of success will be early and effective coordination with Caltrans for encroachment permitting. Our approach prioritizes development of permit-ready construction contract documents early in design, including traffic control plans, trenchless feasibility, and protection of adjacent bridge infrastructure. Given the complexity of working within the SR-78 interchange, we will evaluate trenchless construction opportunities to reduce impacts to traffic, minimize excavation near critical infrastructure, and limit the duration and complexity of bypass operations.

We also recognize that traffic control at the SR-78 on- and off-ramps at Sycamore Avenue will be a key driver of both constructability and permitting, requiring thoughtful staging and coordination to maintain safe and efficient traffic flow. Our approach is to address these constraints early in the Preliminary Design Report (PDR) phase, allowing the City/District to make informed decisions that balance cost, risk, and schedule.

Responsiveness to Client Needs and Local Coordination. Harris understands the importance of responsiveness, flexibility, and alignment with City priorities. Our recent work on the Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements Project demonstrates this commitment, where we successfully delivered sewer improvements, including downtown manhole rehabilitations, while maintaining schedule and ultimately returning value to the City by completing the project under the progressive design-build’s Guaranteed Maximum Price.

Our responsiveness is also reflected in the quality and usability of our deliverables. The Basis of Design Report (BOD) we developed for prior City projects has been used as a reference for subsequent efforts due to their clarity, completeness, and high-quality, demonstrating our ability to produce documents that support efficient decision-making and long-term value.

We also bring proven experience obtaining Caltrans encroachment permits for similar freeway- adjacent sewer improvements, allowing us to anticipate requirements and streamline approvals.

In addition, we are familiar with the City’s monthly utility liaison meetings, which serve as a key forum for coordination, utility conflict resolution, and stakeholder alignment. Harris will actively participate in and leverage these meetings to proactively identify and resolve conflicts, reducing risk to both design and construction.

1. COVER LETTER

RFP REQUIREMENTS
Harris & Associates key
personnel are committed
to perform the required
tasks throughout the
duration of the contract.

Harris & Associates
can meet the District’s
insurance requirements
and is prepared to
execute the Professional
Services Master
Agreement as written.

Harris & Associates will
not make any changes to
the project team without
authorization of the
06/09/2026 C5 377 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.1. Cover Letter  iii
Experience with Similar Projects and Team Qualifications. Harris offers a highly experienced, locally focused team with deep expertise in wastewater conveyance infrastructure. Our practice in San Diego County is dedicated exclusively to the water market, with a strong emphasis on sewer collection systems, pumping, and conveyance.

This project will be led by Jason Caprio, PE, PMP (Principal-in-Charge) and Jean-Luc Delbecq, PE (Project Manager), supported by a team with significant tenure and experience delivering similar projects throughout the region. Our team has successfully completed sewer upsizing, rehabilitation, and trenchless projects in constrained urban environments requiring bypass planning, traffic control, and complex stakeholder coordination.

Our client references reflect a consistent track record of high-quality deliverables, responsiveness, and successful project outcomes, reinforcing our reputation as a trusted partner for public agencies across San Diego County.

Knowledge of the City of Vista System and Local Conditions. Through our ongoing work with the City of Vista and Buena Sanitation District, Harris has developed a strong understanding of the City’s wastewater collection system, design standards, and operational priorities. This familiarity allows us to efficiently evaluate system performance, anticipate constraints, and develop practical, cost-effective design solutions that align with City expectations.

Commitment to Quality and Successful Delivery. Harris is committed to delivering a high-quality, coordinated, and constructible design that meets the City’s expectations for well-organized, technically sound, and thoroughly reviewed work products. Our project management approach is grounded in industry best practices, including alignment with the Project Management Institute (PMI) and PMP principles, ensuring disciplined management of scope, schedule, and budget.

Our QA/QC program is detailed and systematic, incorporating independent technical reviews, interdisciplinary coordination, and formal backchecking at each milestone. We take full ownership of our deliverables and ensure that all plans, specifications, and supporting documents are accurate, complete, and ready for bidding and construction.

Harris appreciates the opportunity to support the City of Vista and Buena Sanitation District on this important project. We look forward to partnering with you to deliver a successful, well-coordinated, and constructible solution.

Sincerely,
Harris & Associates, Inc.

Jason Caprio, PE, PMP Jean-Luc Delbecq, PE
Principal-in-Charge (Authorized Signatory) Project Manager 661.319.9251 | [email protected] 442.226.5343 | [email protected] 2375 Northside Drive Suite 125, San Diego, CA 92108 2375 Northside Drive, Suite 125, San Diego, CA 92108 06/09/2026 C5 378 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.2. Company Information  1

2. COMPANY INFORMATION
a. Identification of Responder
Harris & Associates, Inc.
b. Legal Name and Address
Harris & Associates, Inc.
1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500
Concord, CA 94520
Legal Form: CA S Corporation
c. Parent Company
Not applicable.
d. San Diego County Office Address
2375 Northside Drive Suite 125
San Diego, CA 92108
e. Number of Employees in San Diego
County
60 employees in San Diego County
f. Contact Person
Jason Caprio, PE, PMP
Principal-in-Charge
Harris & Associates, Inc.
2375 Northside Drive Suite 125
San Diego, CA 92108
661.319.9251
[email protected]

3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH

3.1 Project Understanding
The CIP 8396 Sycamore Avenue Sewer Capacity Improvements Project is a targeted capital improvement identified in the 2025 City of Vista and Buena Sanitation District Sewer Master Plan to address hydraulic deficiencies within the wastewater collection system under peak wet-weather conditions. The project consists of upsizing approximately 667 linear feet of existing 15-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sewer to 24-inch diameter VCP along Sycamore Avenue, including an undercrossing beneath State Route 78. Based on our review of the available information, this segment of the system operates near or beyond acceptable capacity thresholds during peak wet-weather events (i.e., exceeding 0.75 d/D), driven by inflow and infiltration (I/I) and upstream system contributions, and is anticipated to surcharge under future buildout conditions.

The proposed improvements will reduce surcharge potential, improve hydraulic performance, and support long-term system reliability and regulatory compliance as tributary areas continue to develop.

While the project is relatively limited in length, it presents a high degree of technical and construction complexity due to its location within the Sycamore Avenue corridor, including the SR-78 on- and off-ramps, ingress and egress to adjacent businesses and gas stations, and the need to construct beneath the State Route 78 bridge overcrossing within Caltrans
right-of-way. Harris is well-positioned to deliver this project based on our recent and historical experience designing sewer capacity improvements throughout San Diego County, including multiple projects within the City of Vista. Our team has successfully prepared Preliminary Design Reports and construction contract documents for sewer improvements
projects, including work involving trenchless installations, complex utility coordination, bypass pumping considerations, and construction within heavily trafficked corridors. Through this experience, we understand the City’s expectations for design development and proactively integrate constructability, permitting, and utility coordination into our designs to reduce risk, streamline approvals, and deliver complete, permit-ready construction contract documents.

Project Complexity: Sycamore Avenue is a primary
arterial and one of the City’s busiest interchanges with SR-78.

It is filled with high turning volumes, peak-hour commuter congestion, and regional traffic demand. Traffic control planning for on and off-ramps will be imperative to limit inconveniences and reduce ramp queue back-ups onto
Caltrans’ right-of-way.
06/09/2026 C5 379 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.3. Project Understanding and Approach  2

3.2 Key Challenges and Risks

FREEWAY CROSSING AND CALTRANS

COORDINATION
The alignment beneath SR-78 introduces permitting, access, and staging constraints, as well as design considerations such as trenchless installation, potential carrier pipe casing requirements, and protection of adjacent infrastructure.

Leveraging our experience working with Caltrans District 11, our team will proactively advance key permit drivers early, including confirmation of design criteria (e.g., casing, clearances, and allowable construction methods), and
development of an encroachment permit-ready design package, including traffic control concepts consistent with Caltrans requirements. Based on our experience with Caltrans District 11, requirements such as maintaining minimum cover over trenchless installations, avoiding impacts to structural elements, and adhering to restricted lane closure windows will be key drivers in both design and permitting.

In addition, our team brings extensive experience in trenchless sewer design, including jack-and-bore, horizontal directional drilling (HDD), pipe bursting, and other trenchless installation methods beneath highways and rail corridors. We will evaluate these methods to minimize impacts within Caltrans right-of- way, reduce surface disruption, and support a constructible and permit-compliant solution.

Based on our experience with prior City of Vista projects, including the Eucalyptus-Citrus Sewer Improvements Project, we understand the City’s preference for corrosion-resistant materials in areas of limited or infrequent access. For this project, we will evaluate the use of polymer concrete manholes, such as Armorock, in lieu of conventional cast-in-place structures.

SUBSURFACE CONSTRAINTS, UTILITY

CONFLICTS, AND ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVE
Sycamore Avenue includes known critical utilities, including an existing 12/16” diameter asbestos cement water main, a 20” diameter CML&C water main, owned and operated by
Vista Irrigation District, and two diameter gas mains, 4” and 8” diameters, respectively, owned and operated by SDG&E.

Given the inherent uncertainty in record information, utility locating and potholing will be essential to confirm conditions, identify conflicts early, and inform alignment decisions or guide alternative approaches.

Based on our review, a potential alternative
parallel alignment within the southwest-bound
lane (Lane #3) of Sycamore Avenue may avoid
conflicts with the existing water and gas mains
(see image below). This approach will reduce
utility risk and significantly limit bypass
pumping requirements by reducing the extent of active system disruption to localized tie-in work. Additionally, maintaining the existing alignment in service during construction will provide operational flexibility and redundancy for this critical segment of the system. This alternative alignment will also improve horizontal separation between sewer and potable water infrastructure, which is favorable from a regulatory standpoint and consistent with Division of Drinking Water (DDW) requirements. Based on our experience with similar encroachment permits under Caltrans District 11, we anticipate review by the Structure Maintenance and Investigations
Division, who may enforce maintaining a minimum horizontal clearance of approximately 15 feet from bridge foundations.

This alternative will be validated during preliminary design to confirm feasibility and to reduce overall construction risk, bypass complexity, and most importantly, construction cost.

Potential Modified Alignment:

Following review of the As-Built
plans, and conducting an in-person
site walk, we believe that a potential
alternative parallel alignment along
Sycamore Avenue may avoid conflicts
with the existing utilities and reduces
construction costs by limiting bypass
operations and simplifies traffic lane
impacts.

Advantages of Alternative
Alignment:
 Limits Existing Utility Impacts
 Reduces Existing Sewer Disruption
 Provides Redundancy and
Operational Flexibility
 Improves Sewer-Water Separation
06/09/2026 C5 380 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.3. Project Understanding and Approach  3

MAINTAINING CONTINUOUS SEWER SERVICE
The existing sewer must remain operational during
construction, requiring integration of bypass pumping and sequencing considerations into the design. As a means and methods activity, bypass pumping efforts can be challenging to define during design, and from a contractor’s perspective, costs are often treated as allowances that can escalate during construction if not clearly established. Additionally, the project’s location presents constraints routing temporary piping within an active roadway environment.

To address this, our team will evaluate bypass strategies in accordance with the City of Vista Sewer Bypass Pumping
Guidelines, including anticipated flow rates, staging,
and durations, and identify opportunities to limit and
optimize bypass duration through phasing, sequencing, and constructability considerations.

TRAFFIC CONTROL AND IMPACTS TO THE PUBLIC
Construction within a major, active roadway environment will require careful phasing, traffic control, and coordination to minimize disruption to the public and maintain safe operations, particularly for ingress and egress associated with State Route

78. Our team will integrate traffic control and construction phasing considerations into the design, evaluating staging and sequencing strategies early to develop a solution that minimizes public impacts, including potential restrictions on lane closures, ramp operations, and allowable work windows within the SR-78 corridor.

The planned improvements traverse the inside travel lanes of Sycamore Avenue beneath the overcrossing and through the left-turn lane / ramp terminal area near the southbound freeway on-ramp. Accordingly, traffic control planning will focus on staged lane management within the Sycamore Avenue roadway, maintaining ramp and local access where feasible, and limiting the most disruptive lane and turning-movement restrictions to short-duration off-peak construction windows.

3.3 Approach – Targeted Strategies
to Enhance Delivery
Harris’ approach to this project is grounded in proactive planning, early coordination, and identification of opportunities to improve constructability, reduce cost, and support schedule certainty. Based on our review of the project constraints and requirements, we offer the following targeted strategies to enhance overall project delivery:

EARLY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANNING

AND CALTRANS COORDINATION
Recognizing that the 30% design phase will
establish the horizontal alignment and define
the project’s footprint within active traffic
lanes along Sycamore Avenue and the SR-78
interchange, Harris recommends advancing traffic control plan development concurrently with the City-concurred 30% design. This early effort will allow for meaningful coordination with Caltrans District 11 and support the preparation of a more complete and permit-ready encroachment package. To further streamline the permitting process, Harris proposes initiating Caltrans submittals at the 60% design stage, allowing sufficient time for review, comment resolution, and approval without impacting the overall project schedule. This approach reduces permitting risk and positions the project for a more predictable path to construction.

STRATEGIC DEFERRAL OF POTHOLE

RESTORATION TO CONSTRUCTION
While Harris acknowledges the requirement
to restore potholing locations with hot-mix
asphalt, we recommend that final surface
restoration be deferred to the construction
phase and performed by the Contractor. This approach avoids redundant work and associated costs during design, as many pothole locations will likely be disturbed during subsequent construction activities. By incorporating temporary restoration measures during investigation and deferring permanent
restoration to construction, the project benefits from improved efficiency, reduced rework, and better alignment with final surface conditions.

OPPORTUNISTIC UPSIZING TO

ADDRESS DOWNSTREAM CAPACITY
GAP
Based on our review of the Sewer Master
Plan and project limits, Harris has identified
a potential opportunity to enhance system
performance by including an additional segment of 15-inch sewer main upsizing between the limits of this project (EX_B3) and the planned downstream improvements (BO_B3C). This
segment appears to represent a gap in the overall upsizing strategy and may constrain system capacity if left unaddressed.

Given the project’s proximity, anticipated construction mobilization, and required Caltrans permitting, incorporating this segment now could leverage economies of scale, reduce future disruption, and optimize long-term system performance.

Harris recommends coordinating with the District to further evaluate this opportunity during the Preliminary Design Report phase.
06/09/2026 C5 381 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  4

4. DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES
a. Scope of Work
The proposed scope of services is structured to support a logical, milestone-driven design process that prioritizes early risk identification, informed decision-making, and development of a constructible, permit-ready design.

Note: We appreciate the City’s well-developed Scope of Work and the comprehensive list of tasks and subtasks provided in the RFP.

The scope appropriately reflects the key elements necessary to successfully deliver the project. To enhance clarity, usability, and alignment with our project management and delivery approach, we have reorganized a few of these, maintaining the original intent, while also improving work flow and task integration. In doing so, we have also introduced a limited number of additional subtasks that we believe are essential to fully support successful project execution, but were not explicitly identified in the RFP.

These added elements are clearly noted and identified with an icon for transparency and ease of reference.

TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND

ADMINISTRATION
This task includes overall project management, coordination, and communication to ensure the project is delivered on schedule, within budget, and in alignment with City of Vista expectations.
➕➕ 1.1 - General Project Management and
Administration
Project management responsibilities generally include
management of the project’s scope, budget, schedule, resourcing, invoicing, and general communications with both internal and external teams. Regular progress updates, and tracking of key decisions, risks, and action items will be maintained throughout the duration of the project.
🔑 1.2 – Kickoff Meeting
The Harris team will lead and conduct one (1) kickoff meeting with the City of Vista/Buena Sanitation District staff and any influential project stakeholders to confirm project goals, scope, schedule, and communication protocols. The meeting will also be used to identify critical constraints, data needs, and coordination requirements.
➕➕ 1.3 – Coordination with Subconsultants
Harris will manage and coordinate topographic surveys,
geotechnical engineering, and utility locating / potholing subconsultants to ensure timely and consistent delivery of important foundational information. The Harris team will integrate subconsultant efforts into the overall project schedule and design development process.
➕➕ 1.4 – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
(QA/QC)
Harris will implement a structured Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) process throughout the duration of the project to ensure that all deliverables are accurate, complete, and consistent with City expectations. Our team will utilize established internal QA/QC procedures and discipline-specific checklists developed for civil infrastructure projects to verify technical accuracy, coordination between disciplines, and compliance with applicable standards.

All design deliverables will be reviewed for consistency with City of Vista standards, San Diego Regional Standards,
and other applicable design criteria. Our team will perform independent internal reviews at key milestones, including 30%, 60%, 90%, and final design, to confirm that drawings, specifications, and supporting documents are coordinated and free of conflicts or omissions.

In addition to standard QA/QC procedures, senior staff, including Principal Engineers and experienced project leaders, will provide oversight and perform independent technical reviews of major deliverables. This level of review ensures that critical design decisions, assumptions, and technical approaches are validated by experienced professionals, reducing risk and improving overall quality. Through this process, we aim to deliver clear, coordinated, and constructible documents that minimize ambiguity and reduce the potential for change orders during construction.
🔑 Key Task - Tasks are outlined in the City’s Scope of Services.
➕➕ Added Task - Tasks added by Harris and are
supplemental to the City’s Scope of Services.

Kickoff Meetings: Harris will work with the City/District to identify the key stakeholders who will be invited to the project kickoff. The first step in the process, this meeting is key to setting the lines of communication for the whole project.
06/09/2026 C5 382 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  5 TASK 2 – INVESTIGATIONS AND PRELIMINARY

ENGINEERING
This task focuses on reducing design uncertainty and informing key project decisions through data collection, field verification, and preliminary engineering analyses. These efforts are front- loaded to support alignment selection and support development of a feasible and constructible design approach.
➕➕ 2.1 – Research, Data Collection, and Investigations The Harris team will compile and review available mapping, record drawings, GIS data, as-builts, and other relevant information identified in the RFP to support design. This effort will include review of bridge infrastructure and Caltrans right-of-way constraints associated with the SR-78 crossing, identification of environmentally sensitive areas or drainage features that may influence construction, and consideration of adjacent land uses and community access requirements along the project corridor. Harris will also gather available utility records, prior studies, and City/District data to establish a comprehensive understanding of existing conditions. Data gaps will be identified early to guide field verification and additional investigations.
🔑 2.2 – Review of Previous Reports and Available
Materials
Harris will review compiled materials including the 2025 Sewer Master Plan, available as-builts, utility records, and agency documentation, to confirm design criteria, system deficiencies, and planning assumptions. The Harris team will evaluate how identified constraints, such as bridge infrastructure, environmental considerations, and community impacts may affect alignment selection, constructability, and permitting requirements.
🔑 2.3 – External Utility Coordination and Conflict
Checks
The Harris team will initiate coordination with utility owners such as AT&T, Cox Communications, and MCI (Verizon
Business), to obtain record information, schematics, maps, as-builts, and/or record drawings that will support utility basemapping exercises. A utility conflict matrix will be developed to track communications and ensure coordination does not fall through the cracks throughout the project development.

At major design milestones, Harris will distribute the design drawings for conflict checks with these utility stakeholders to solicit feedback and comments that may influence the proposed improvements.
➕➕ 2.4 – Site Visits and Field Confirmations
While record drawings and mapping provide a critical
foundation for design, the Harris team recognizes that there is no substitute for direct observation of existing conditions.

Harris team members will conduct multiple site visits to confirm field conditions, assess access constraints, and identify factors that are not always evident in available data or street views. These observations are particularly important within the SR-78 corridor, where bridge infrastructure and traffic conditions need to be observed.
🔑 2.5 – Topographic Survey
Harris will retain O’Day Consultants to perform topographic survey services to support design development. The Harris team will coordinate closely with O’Day to establish horizontal and vertical control in accordance with City of Vista standards and develop detailed base mapping for the project corridor.

Survey efforts will include aerial and supplemental topography, identification of above-ground utilities and surface features, and detailed mapping beneath the SR-78 bridge, including bridge columns, abutments, roadway geometry, and striping. In addition, O’Day will research and map applicable right-of-way boundaries, including Caltrans right-of-way.
🔑 2.6 – Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting
Harris will retain Ninyo & Moore, a Socotec Company, to perform a geotechnical investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions along the proposed alignment. The Harris team will coordinate the investigation to support design considerations associated with a potential trenchless installation. The geotechnical scope will include exploratory borings, laboratory testing, and engineering analysis to characterize site soils, groundwater presence, and existing pavement and subgrade sections.
🔑 2.7 – Subsurface Utility Locating and Potholing
Harris will retain T2 Utility Engineers to perform subsurface utility investigations, including test holes (potholing), to confirm the horizontal and vertical location of critical utilities within the project corridor. The Harris team will coordinate potholing locations based on preliminary design to target potential conflicts, including water mains, gas mains, and other utilities identified during initial investigations.

T2 will perform up to ten (10) test holes using vacuum
excavation and provide detailed data sheets, including utility Site Visits: The Harris Team has visited the project site and understands the potential risks and challenges that may occur. This insight will help the team to quickly to mobilize and begin work right away.
06/09/2026 C5 383 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  6 depth, size, material, and photographic documentation. This effort will reduce uncertainty associated with subsurface conditions, support alignment refinement, and minimize
the risk of conflicts and change orders during construction.

Coordination with the City of Vista, Caltrans, and other agencies for required encroachment permits and traffic control will be incorporated into this effort as needed. Disruptions will be temporary, and pavement will be restored in accordance with City of Vista Standard Drawings.
🔑 2.8 – Hydraulic Capacity Sewer Modeling
Harris will perform hydraulic modeling to evaluate existing system performance and confirm the required capacity
improvements for the project. The Harris team will utilize available system data, including information from the Sewer Master Plan and record drawings, to develop and refine the hydraulic model.

Modeling will be performed in two phases to support key design decisions:

1. An initial modeling effort will be conducted during
preliminary engineering to validate planning-level
assumptions, confirm hydraulic deficiencies, and establish baseline design criteria, including target pipe sizing and capacity requirements

2. A second iteration of modeling will be performed during design development, following advancement of horizontal and vertical alignments, to refine system performance based on updated profiles, confirm hydraulic grade line (HGL) behavior, and evaluate potential impacts to upstream and downstream systems.

This iterative approach allows the Harris team to use
hydraulic modeling as an active design tool rather than a one-time validation exercise, supporting alignment selection, constructability considerations, and coordination with
downstream infrastructure. Results from the modeling efforts will be incorporated into the Basis of Design Memorandum and Preliminary Design Report to support informed
decision-making and provide a clear basis for the proposed improvements.
🔑 2.9 – Review of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV)
We will review available Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection data for the existing sewer segments proposed for upsizing. Our team
includes staff certified under
NASSCO’s Pipeline Assessment
Certification Program (PACP),
Manhole Assessment Certification Program (MACP), and
Lateral Assessment Certification Program (LACP), ensuring that CCTV observations are interpreted using standardized industry criteria and best practices. This review will identify existing service connections, lateral locations, and structural or operational deficiencies, including cracks, root intrusion, deformation, and evidence of inflow and infiltration.

CCTV data will also be used to inform design by confirming pipe geometry, tie-in conditions, and potential constraints that may affect alignment development and bypass planning.

Where gaps or uncertainties are identified, we will recommend targeted supplemental investigation. This approach reduces uncertainty in existing conditions and supports development of a constructible design.
🔑 2.10 – Basis of Design Memorandum (BODM)
We will prepare a Basis of Design Memorandum (BODM) to
document the technical foundation for the project and establish the criteria, assumptions, and constraints that will guide design development. The BODM will compile and synthesize findings from investigations completed under Task 2, including survey, utility coordination, geotechnical data, CCTV review, and initial hydraulic modeling, to develop a clear understanding of existing conditions and project requirements.

The BODM will define key design parameters, including
anticipated flow conditions, preliminary pipe sizing criteria, alignment constraints, and known utility conflicts, as well as considerations related to bridge infrastructure, Caltrans SWMMM: This is an example of our hydraulic profile of peak wet weather flows for the City of Vista’s Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements for which Harris was the engineer of record. This project had many similarities to this current Sycamore Avenue/Highway 78 project, which should provide confidence to the City that we have done this before and done it well.

Potholing: T2ue will establish the vertical location,
material, and size of selected utilities using air-vacuum excavation and the potholes will be backfilled per permit requirements.
06/09/2026 C5 384 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  7 right-of-way, environmental factors, and community impacts.

Preliminary alignment concepts, including the base alignment and potential alternatives, will be introduced at a conceptual level to frame subsequent evaluation during the 30% design phase. The BODM will also identify key risks, data gaps, and critical design decisions to be addressed during development of the Preliminary Design Report (PDR).

The BODM will serve as a foundational document to align the collective project team on design criteria and project approach prior to advancing into detailed alternatives analysis and design development.
🔑 TASK 3 – 30% DESIGN
The 30% design phase will focus on development and evaluation of preliminary design alternatives, leading to identification of a preferred alignment and overall design approach. Building upon the Basis of Design Memorandum (BODM), this phase will
integrate findings from investigations, including survey, utility coordination, geotechnical data, CCTV review, and hydraulic modeling.
➕➕ 3.1 – 30% Horizontal Alignment Drawings
We will prepare 30% preliminary design drawings to illustrate existing conditions, key constraints, and feasible alignment alternatives within the project corridor. Drawings sheets are anticipated to include:

1. Title Sheet, Sheet Index, Key Map, Vicinity Map, Legend

2. General Notes

3. Existing Conditions, Right-of-Way and Boundaries, Staging and Storage

4. Sewer Plan 1 (STA 0+00 to STA 3+50); MH-B0832 to MH B08050 to >MH B0851

5. Sewer Plan 2 (Sta 3+50 to Sta 7+00); >MH B0851 to MH B0852

6. Concept Bypass Plan
➕➕ 3.2 – 30% Interim Meetings
We will conduct interim coordination meetings with the City and key stakeholders during development of the 30% design to present preliminary findings, discuss constraints, and obtain input on alignment alternatives and design considerations.

These meetings will support collaborative decision-making and allow the project team to refine the design approach based on City feedback.
➕➕ 3.3 – 30% Review Meeting
We will conduct a formal 30% design review meeting and workshop with the City to present the preliminary design drawings and summarize key findings from investigations and analyses. The meeting will focus on discussing feasible alignment alternatives, identifying a preferred approach, and confirming overall project direction prior to advancement into subsequent design phases.
🔑 3.4 – Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
We recognize the Preliminary Design Report (PDR) as a critical milestone in the project, serving as the primary decision- making document that establishes the preferred alignment and overall design approach prior to advancing into final design.

We will prepare a comprehensive Draft PDR that evaluates design alternatives and presents a clear, defensible basis for the recommended solution, consistent with City requirements.

Our team has previous experience preparing these types of reports for the City of Vista, including the Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements Project and the Monte Mar Storm
Drain Improvements Project. These reports were developed as formal decision-making documents and included evaluation of existing conditions, stakeholder and utility coordination, right-of-way and easement constraints, alternatives analysis, hydraulic evaluation, constructability considerations, and planning-level construction cost estimates. For example, prior PDRs prepared by our team have included sections addressing existing system deficiencies, utility coordination, alignment development, hydraulic analyses, bypass planning, geotechnical considerations, and construction implementation factors, providing a comprehensive and structured basis for project advancement.

Building upon this experience, the PDR for this project will synthesize findings from investigations and preliminary design to evaluate feasible alignment alternatives, including:
• Base alignment and any potential parallel alignments
• Trenchless feasibility evaluations, with consideration given to utility conflicts
• Bridge infrastructure constraints
• Caltrans right-of-way requirements
06/09/2026 C5 385 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  8 • Environmental factors
• Community impacts
Each alternative will be assessed with respect to constructability, including trenchless feasibility, access and staging constraints, traffic impacts, and anticipated bypass requirements. Hydraulic modeling results will be incorporated to confirm pipe sizing, evaluate system performance, and identify upstream and
downstream impacts.

By preparing the PDR in a format consistent with prior City of Vista projects, we will facilitate efficient review, reduce the need for reformatting or clarification, and support timely confirmation of project direction prior to advancing into final design.
➕➕ 3.5 – PDR Review Meeting and Workshop
We will conduct a PDR review meeting with the Project teams to present the draft report, discuss the recommended alignment and design approach, and obtain feedback prior to advancing the design. While written comments are an important part of the review process, our team recognizes that there is no substitute for in-person (or live virtual) discussions when working through complex design decisions. These conversations allow for real-time clarification of assumptions, constraints, and tradeoffs, leading to more efficient and informed decision- making.

The Harris team will use this meeting to walk through key elements of the PDR and will work collaboratively with the City to confirm the preferred approach. This interactive process helps resolve questions early and align expectations.
🔑 TASK 4 – 60% DESIGN
The 60% design phase will focus on advancing the preferred alignment and design approach identified in the PDR into a coordinated and more fully developed design. Building upon the decisions established during the 30% phase, we will refine horizontal and vertical alignments, incorporate verified utility data, and further develop construction considerations to support permitting, stakeholder coordination, and progression toward final design.
➕➕ 4.1 – 60% Vertical Alignment Drawings
We will prepare 60% design drawings that advance the
preliminary design into a more detailed and coordinated set of documents. Our team will refine plan and profile drawings to reflect the preferred alignment, incorporating survey data, potholing results, and utility coordination to resolve conflicts and establish more accurate horizontal and vertical geometry.

Vertical profiles will be developed in greater detail to confirm pipe depths, slopes, and tie-in conditions. We anticipate progressing the sheets from 30% design, and also adding the following sheets:

7. Details

8. Erosion Control Plan
➕➕ 4.2 – 60% Interim Meetings
We will conduct interim coordination meetings with the
City and stakeholders during development of the 60% design to review progress, discuss design refinements, and address coordination items such as utility conflicts, trenchless design considerations, and permitting requirements.
➕➕ 4.3 – 60% Review Meeting and Workshop
We will conduct a 60% design review meeting and workshop with the City to present the developed design and discuss key elements including vertical alignment, utility conflict resolutions, trenchless installation approaches, and traffic control strategies. Similar to the PDR workshop, this meeting will provide an opportunity for real-time discussion and collaborative problem-solving, allowing the project team to resolve outstanding issues and confirm readiness to advance to 90% design.
🔑 4.4 – Final Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
We will prepare a Final Preliminary Design Report (PDR) incorporating comments received from the City and
stakeholders on the draft PDR. Our team will review and address all comments in a coordinated manner, refining the evaluation of alternatives, recommended alignment, and
supporting technical analyses as needed to reflect agreed-upon project direction.

The Final PDR will document the confirmed preferred
alignment and design approach, along with updated hydraulic findings, trenchless design (if required), utility coordination outcomes, and constructability considerations. Revisions will be made to ensure consistency between the report and the advancing design drawings, including alignment geometry, profile development, and identified constraints.

Workshops: Recent Basis of Design + 60% design
deliverables workshop with client hosted at our office in Mission Valley. Harris team members pride themselves in well- run, organized workshops that encourage participation and solicit feedback from all stakeholders.
06/09/2026 C5 386 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  9 The finalized PDR will serve as the basis for continued design development and coordination with all stakeholders.
🔑 TASK 5 – 90% DESIGN DRAWINGS
The 90% design phase will focus on advancing the project into a near-final, fully coordinated design that is suitable for review and preparation of bid documents. Building upon the refined design developed at the 60% stage, our team will complete detailed design elements, create traffic control plans required for permitting, and ensure consistency between drawings, specifications, and cost estimates.
➕➕ 5.1 – 90% Design Drawings
We anticipate progressing the sheets from 60% design,
incorporating City comments, and also adding the following sheets:

9. Traffic Control Plan General Notes

10. Cross Section of Sewer and Overpass Structure Footings

11. - 18. Traffic Control Plans 1 thru 8
➕➕ 5.2 – 90% Specifications
We will prepare 90% technical specifications for the project to be included as part of the 90% design submittal. The specifications will define materials, products, and construction requirements for all elements of the work, including sewer pipeline installation, manholes and appurtenances, trenchless construction methods (if applicable), bypass pumping, traffic control, surface restoration, and all associated improvements.

Our team will develop specifications using applicable City of Vista standards, City of Vista boilerplate specifications, San Diego Regional Standards, and Greenbook specifications, supplemented as necessary with CSI format technical
specifications to address project-specific conditions.
➕➕ 5.3 – Construction Cost Estimate (EOPCC)
We will prepare an Engineer’s Opinion of Probable
Construction Cost (EOPCC) for the project as part of the 90% design submittal. The EOPCC will be based on the developed design drawings and specifications and will reflect current construction market conditions.

Our team will prepare the estimate using a detailed, itemized format consistent with City of Vista standards, including quantities, unit prices, and total costs for each bid item.

Quantities will be developed directly from the design drawings, and unit costs will be based on recent bid data from similar projects in the region, adjusted as appropriate for project- specific conditions.

The EOPCC will include all major construction components, including sewer improvements, manholes and appurtenances, trenchless installations (if applicable), bypass pumping, traffic control, surface restoration, and ancillary work.

Allowances, contingencies, and escalation will be incorporated as appropriate to reflect the level of design and associated uncertainties at the 90% stage.

The estimate will be prepared to support project budgeting and bidding, and will be reviewed internally for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. This approach provides the District with a reliable and transparent basis for understanding anticipated construction costs and advancing the project into final design and procurement.
➕➕ 5.4 – 90% Review Meeting
We will conduct a 90% design review meeting with the City to present the near-final design drawings, specifications, and Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
(EOPCC). The meeting will focus on confirming that the
design is complete, coordinated, and ready for finalization, and identifying any remaining comments or refinements prior to final submittal.

TASK 6 – PERMITTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL

SUPPORT
This task will support coordination with regulatory agencies and preparation of information required for permitting and environmental compliance. These efforts will be integrated with design development to identify requirements early, address agency constraints, and reduce the potential for delays during later project phases. The Harris team will work closely with the City and applicable agencies, including Caltrans and environmental teams evaluating CEQA requirements,
to facilitate permit approvals and ensure that the design is consistent with regulatory requirements.
➕➕ 6.1 – External Agency Stakeholder Coordination
We will perform coordination with external agencies and stakeholders, including utility owners, regulatory agencies, and other entities with jurisdiction or interest in the project.

Our team will initiate and maintain communication with
these stakeholders to obtain relevant information, confirm requirements, and support development of a coordinated and permit-compliant design.

Coordination efforts will include identifying affected agencies, preparing and distributing project information, and facilitating discussions related to utility conflicts, right-of-way constraints, environmental considerations, and permitting requirements.

We will document coordination efforts and incorporate agency and stakeholder input into the design to ensure that project requirements are addressed early and consistently throughout design development.
🔑 6.2 – Caltrans Encroachment Permit Support
We recognize that obtaining a Caltrans Encroachment Permit for work within State Route 78 right-of-way is a critical path item for the project and requires early, proactive coordination. 06/09/2026 C5 387 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  10 Our team will support preparation of permit application materials and coordination with Caltrans to facilitate timely review and approval.

Our team has prior experience obtaining
Caltrans Encroachment Permits for both
open-trench and trenchless installations
within State right-of-way (ROW), and
understands the technical and procedural
requirements necessary to secure approval.

We will utilize this experience to develop
permit-ready exhibits and supporting
documentation, including plan and profile
drawings, right-of-way mapping, and traffic
control plans that clearly demonstrate how
the work can be constructed safely and in compliance with Caltrans standards.

Particular attention will be given to key technical considerations that often drive permit approval, including temporary traffic control, lane closure requirements, allowable work windows, and protection of existing bridge and highway infrastructure within their ROW.
🔑 6.3 – Engineering Support for Environmental Permit
Applications (CEQA)
We will provide engineering support for environmental
documentation and permitting in accordance with CEQA
requirements. Harris has an in-house Environmental Planning and Compliance (EPC) team has that has extensive experience supporting City of Vista projects and is highly knowledgeable in CEQA processes, documentation requirements, and
coordination with regulatory agencies.

Our EPC staff will guide the engineering team to translate technical design information into clear and usable inputs for the City’s environmental documentation, including project descriptions, impact assessments, and supporting technical analyses. This coordination ensures that environmental
documents accurately reflect the proposed improvements and that design considerations are aligned with environmental constraints and permitting requirements. Although we
anticipate this project to qualify for a Categorical Exemption, we want to ensure this integrated approach helps streamline the CEQA process, reduces the potential for rework, and supports efficient progression of the project through environmental review and permitting.
🔑 TASK 7 – FINAL DESIGN
The final design phase will focus on incorporating comments from the 90% review, finalizing all design documents, and preparing a complete, coordinated bid-ready package.

7.1 – Draft Final Submittal
We will prepare a draft final (100%) design submittal
incorporating comments received from the 90% design review.

This submittal will include final design drawings, specifications, and an updated EOPCC reflecting any design refinements.

The Harris team will ensure that all design elements are fully coordinated, including alignment geometry, utility conflicts, trenchless design elements, traffic control plans, and restoration requirements.

7.2 – Draft Final Review Meeting
We will conduct a draft final review meeting with the City to present the updated design and confirm that all comments have been addressed. This meeting will provide an opportunity to resolve any remaining questions and ensure alignment prior to issuance of the final bid-ready documents.
➕➕ 7.3 – Final Submittal
We will submit the final design package incorporating all City comments and any final refinements. The final submittal will include signed and sealed drawings, final specifications, and a final Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost.

This package will be suitable for advertisement, bidding, and solicitation.
🔑 TASK 8 – BID SUPPORT
We will support the City during the advertisement, bidding, and solicitation phase, including attendance at the pre-bid meeting, responding to Requests for Information (RFIs), preparation of addenda, and development of a conformed set of contract documents. These efforts will support a clear and coordinated bidding process, helping to minimize ambiguity and reduce the potential for change orders during construction.

8.1 – Pre-Bid Meeting
We will attend and support the pre-bid meeting to present key elements of the project, respond to bidder questions, and clarify design intent, construction constraints, and coordination requirements.

8.2 – Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs)
We will respond to contractor RFIs during the bidding period in a timely manner to clarify the contract documents and address bidder questions. We have estimated responding to approximately four (4) RFIs that require clarification on the technical aspects of the project (i.e., non-contract related questions).

8.3 – Preparation of Addenda
We will prepare up to two (2) addenda, as needed, to incorporate responses to RFIs and provide clarifications or revisions to the contract documents during the bidding process.

8.4 – Preparation of Conformed Set
We will prepare a conformed set of plans and specifications incorporating all addenda for use during construction.
06/09/2026 C5 388 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  11 🔑 TASK 9 – CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
We will provide construction administration services during the construction phase of the project, including project management support, attendance at the pre-construction
meeting and progress meetings, responding to Requests for Information (RFIs), submittal review, assistance with change orders, and preparation of record drawings. These services will support effective communication, timely resolution of issues, and delivery of a coordinated and constructible project.

9.1 General Project Management During Construction
We will provide general project management support during construction, including coordination with the City, contractor, and stakeholders to address design-related questions and support project delivery.

9.2 Pre-Construction Meeting
We will attend the pre-construction meeting to review project requirements, clarify design intent, and support coordination between the City and awarded contractor.

9.3 Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs)
We will respond to contractor RFIs during construction to clarify design intent and address field conditions as they arise.

We have estimated responding to approximately six (6) RFIs during the construction phase of the project.

9.4 Submittal Review
We will review contractor submittals for general conformance with the design intent and contract documents, including materials, equipment, and any construction methods that require engineering oversight.

9.5 Progress Meetings
We will attend progress meetings to provide design support, discuss construction progress, and address design-related issues.

9.6 Change Order Assistance
We will assist the City in evaluating proposed change orders by reviewing scope, quantities, and cost impacts, and providing technical input as needed. We will address revisions to the contract documents if required to formally provide direction on a construction change.

9.7 Record Drawings
We will prepare record drawings based on contractor-provided redlines and information furnished by the City to reflect as-built conditions.

Quality of Work Product
Following the scope of work items that are outlined above, the Harris team will work with the City/District to deliver a successful project. The quality of our work products is highlighted by our repeat clients and our experience with previous City of Vista projects. Below is an example drawing sheet from the Eucalyptus-Citrus Sewer Improvements Project that was completed for the City.
06/09/2026 C5 389 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  12 b. Schedule
ID Task Mode Text1 Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Total Slack 0 CIP 8396 - Sewer Capacity Improvements at Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78 544 days Mon 6/1/26 Thu 6/29/28 0 days 1 NTP (Anticipated)5 days Mon 6/1/26 Fri 6/5/26 21 days 2 Task 1 Project Management and Coordination 315 days Mon 6/8/26 Fri 8/20/27 224 days 3 1.1 General Project Management and Administration 315 days Mon 6/8/26 Fri 8/20/27 1 224 days 4 1.2 Kickoff Meeting 1 day Mon 6/8/26 Mon 6/8/26 1 538 days 5 1.3 Coordination with Subconsultants 315 days Mon 6/8/26 Fri 8/20/27 1 224 days 6 Task 2 Investigations and Preliminary Engineering 136 days Mon 6/8/26 Mon 12/14/26 10 days 7 2.1 Research, Data Collection, and Investigations 15 days Mon 6/8/26 Fri 6/26/26 1 21 days 8 2.2 Review of Previous Reports and Available Materials 10 days Mon 6/29/26 Fri 7/10/26 1,7 21 days 9 2.3 External Utility Coordination and Conflict Checks 5 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 7/17/26 1,7,8 21 days 10 2.4 Site Visits and Field Confirmations 10 days Mon 7/20/26 Fri 7/31/26 1,7,8,9 35 days 11 2.5 Topographic Survey 30 days Mon 6/22/26 Fri 7/31/26 1SS+15 days 11 days 12 2.6 Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting 50 days Mon 6/22/26 Fri 8/28/26 1SS+15 days 0 days 13 2.7 Subsurface Utility Locating and Potholing 60 days Mon 8/3/26 Fri 10/23/26 1,9,11 11 days 14 2.8 Hydraulic Capacity Sewer Modeling 111 days Mon 7/13/26 Mon 12/14/26 30 days 15 Initial Model 5 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 7/17/26 1SS+30 days 30 days 16 Updates and Verifications per Design 5 days Tue 12/8/26 Mon 12/14/26 13,26SS+20 days 73 days 17 2.9 Review of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV)5 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 7/17/26 1,7,8 30 days 18 2.10 Basis of Design Memorandum (BODM)15 days Mon 8/31/26 Fri 9/18/26 1,7,8,9,11,12,17,15 0 days 19 Task 3 30% Design 36 days Mon 9/21/26 Mon 11/9/26 0 days 20 3.1 30% Horizontal Alignment Drawings 30 days Mon 9/21/26 Fri 10/30/26 1,7,8,9,10,11,17,18 5 days 21 3.2 30% Interim Meetings 1 day Mon 10/5/26 Mon 10/5/26 20SS+10 days 25 days 22 3.3 30% Review Meeting 1 day Mon 11/2/26 Mon 11/2/26 20 5 days 23 3.4 Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR)35 days Mon 9/21/26 Fri 11/6/26 1,7,8,9,10,11,17,18 0 days 24 3.5 PDR Review Meeting 1 day Mon 11/9/26 Mon 11/9/26 23 0 days 25 Task 4 60% Design 46 days Tue 11/10/26 Tue 1/12/27 0 days 26 4.1 60% Vertical Alignment Drawings 45 days Tue 11/10/26 Mon 1/11/27 20,21,22,23,24,12,130 days 27 4.2 60% Interim Meetings (3)1 day Tue 11/24/26 Tue 11/24/26 26SS+10 days 88 days 28 4.3 60% Review Meeting and Workshop 1 day Tue 1/12/27 Tue 1/12/27 26,16 53 days 29 4.4 Final Preliminary Design Report (PDR)45 days Tue 11/10/26 Mon 1/11/27 18,23,24 54 days 30 Task 5 90% Design 46 days Wed 1/13/27 Wed 3/17/27 53 days 31 5.1 90% Design Drawings 45 days Wed 1/13/27 Tue 3/16/27 26,27,28,29 53 days 32 5.2 90% Specifications 30 days Wed 1/13/27 Tue 2/23/27 26,27,28,29 68 days 33 5.3 Construction Cost Estimate (EOPCC)15 days Wed 2/24/27 Tue 3/16/27 31SS+30 days 53 days 34 5.4 90% Review Meeting 1 day Wed 3/17/27 Wed 3/17/27 31,32,33 53 days 35 Task 6 Permitting and Environmental Support 100 days Tue 1/12/27 Mon 5/31/27 0 days 36 6.1 External Agency Stakeholder Coordination 90 days Tue 1/12/27 Mon 5/17/27 26 10 days 37 6.2 Encroachment Permit Support 100 days Tue 1/12/27 Mon 5/31/27 26 0 days 38 6.3 Engineering Support for Environmental Permit Applications (CEQA)60 days Tue 1/12/27 Mon 4/5/27 26 40 days 39 Task 7 Final Design 18 days Tue 6/1/27 Thu 6/24/27 0 days 40 7.1 Draft Final Submittal 10 days Tue 6/1/27 Mon 6/14/27 31,32,33,34,37,38,360 days 41 7.2 Draft Final Review Meeting 1 day Tue 6/15/27 Tue 6/15/27 40 0 days 42 7.3 Final Submittal 7 days Wed 6/16/27 Thu 6/24/27 40,41 0 days 43 Task 8 Bid Support 40 days Fri 6/25/27 Thu 8/19/27 0 days 44 8.1 Pre-Bid Meeting 1 day Fri 8/6/27 Fri 8/6/27 42FS+30 days 9 days 45 8.2 Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs)30 days Fri 6/25/27 Thu 8/5/27 40,41,42 10 days 46 8.3 Preparation of Addenda 30 days Fri 6/25/27 Thu 8/5/27 40,41,42 0 days 47 8.4 Preparation of Conformed Set 5 days Fri 8/13/27 Thu 8/19/27 46FS+5 days 0 days 48 Task 9 Construction Administration 225 days Fri 8/20/27 Thu 6/29/28 0 days 49 9.1 General Project Management During Construction 225 days Fri 8/20/27 Thu 6/29/28 44,45,46,47 0 days 50 9.2 Pre-Construction Meeting 1 day Fri 8/27/27 Fri 8/27/27 45FS+15 days 219 days 51 9.3 Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs)200 days Fri 8/20/27 Thu 5/25/28 44,45,46,47 0 days 52 9.4 Submittal Review 200 days Fri 8/20/27 Thu 5/25/28 44,45,46,47 25 days 53 9.5 Progress Meetings 225 days Fri 8/20/27 Thu 6/29/28 44,45,46,47 0 days 54 9.6 Change Order Assistance 200 days Fri 8/20/27 Thu 5/25/28 44,45,46,47 25 days 55 9.7 Record Drawings 10 days Fri 6/16/28 Thu 6/29/28 51FS+15 days 0 days M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J JHalf 2, 2026 Half 1, 2027 Half 2, 2027 Half 1, 2028 Half 2, 2028

Page 1 ends

06/09/2026 C5 390 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.4. Detailed Scope of Services  13 c. Estimated Hours
Phase/Task
Task 1.0 Project Management and Coordination

1.1 General Project Management and Administration 8 - - 60 - 16 84

1.2 Kickoff Meeting 2 - - 4 - - 6

1.3 Coordination with Subconsultants 2 - - 8 - 8 18

1.4 QA/QC - 40 - 4 4 - 48 Subtotal Hours =12 40 - 76 4 24 156
Task 2.0 Investigations and Preliminary Engineering

2.1 Research, Data Collection, and Investigations - - - 4 8 12 24

2.2 Review of Previous Reports and Available Materials - - - 8 - 12 20

2.3 External Utility Coordination and Conflict Checks - - - 8 - 16 24

2.4 Site Visits and Field Confirmations - - - - 8 8 16

2.5 Topographic Survey - - - 2 4 8 14

2.6 Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting - - - 4 - 8 12

2.7 Subsurface Utility Locating and Potholing - - - 4 4 12 20

2.8 Hydraulic Capacity Sewer Modeling - - 16 8 - 60 84

2.9 Review of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV)- - - 2 - 4 6

2.10 Basis of Design Memorandum (BODM)- 2 - 40 32 - 74 Subtotal Hours =- 2 16 80 56 140 294
Task 3.0 30% Design

3.1 30% Horizontal Alignment Drawings - - 4 12 32 60 108

3.2 30% Interim Meetings (3)- - - 8 4 - 12

3.3 30% Review Meeting (1)- - - 4 2 - 6

3.4 Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR)- 4 - 24 20 - 48

3.5 PDR Review Meeting and Workshop - - - 4 4 - 8 Subtotal Hours =- 4 4 52 62 60 182
Task 4.0 60% Design

4.1 60% Vertical Alignment Drawings - - 4 24 60 160 248

4.2 60% Interim Meetings (3)- - - 8 4 - 12

4.3 60% Review Meeting and Workshop - - - 4 2 - 6

4.4 Final Preliminary Design Report (PDR)- 4 - 24 20 - 48 Subtotal Hours =- 4 4 60 86 160 314
Task 5.0 90% Design

5.1 90% Design Drawings - - 4 16 48 112 180

5.2 90% Specifications - - - 20 24 - 44

5.3 Construction Cost Estimate (EOPCC)- - - 8 8 32 48

5.4 90% Review Meeting - - - 4 2 - 6 Subtotal Hours =- - 4 48 82 144 278
Task 6.0 Permitting and Environmental Support

6.1 External Agency Stakeholder Coordination - - - 24 16 - 40

6.2 Caltrans Encroachment Permit Support - - - 24 24 60 108

6.3 Engineering Support for Environmental Permit Applications (CEQA)- - - 8 8 - 16 Subtotal Hours =- - - 56 48 60 164
Task 7.0 Final Design

7.1 Draft Final Submittal - - 4 4 16 20 44

7.2 Draft Final Review Meeting - - - 4 2 - 6

7.3 Final Submittal - - 4 4 8 8 24 Subtotal Hours =- - 8 12 26 28 74 Task 8.0 Bid Support

8.1 Pre-Bid Meeting - - - 4 4 - 8

8.2 Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) (4)- 2 - 8 - 12 22

8.3 Preparation of Addenda (2)- - - 4 - 16 20

8.4 Preparation of Conformed Set (1)- - - 2 - 8 10 Subtotal Hours =- 2 - 18 4 36 60 Task 9.0 Construction Administration

9.1 General Project Management During Construction 4 - - 36 - - 40

9.2 Pre-Construction Meeting (1)- - - 4 4 - 8

9.3 Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) (6)- 2 - 8 - 24 34

9.4 Submittal Review (10)- - - 8 - 32 40

9.5 Progress Meetings (4)- - - 8 8 - 16

9.6 Change Order Assistance (2)- 2 - 8 - 8 18

9.7 Record Drawings - - - 4 - 32 36 Subtotal Hours =4 4 - 76 12 96 192
Total Hours by Classification =16 56 36 478 380 748 1,714 Percentage of Time Allocated (by hours) =0.93%3.27%2.10%27.89%22.17%43.64%100.00% Harris &
Associates
Total
CIP 8396 - SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78 SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS - Labor Hour Matrix Scope of Work's Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)Principal-in- Charge
QA/QC
Manager
Senior
Engineer
Project
Manager
Project
Engineer
Design
Engineer
CIP 8396 - SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78 SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS06/09/2026 C5 391 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.5. Project Team and Organization Chart  14

5. PROJECT TEAM AND ORGANIZATION CHART
a. Team Organization Chart
Harris & Associates has assembled a highly qualified team with the technical expertise and project experience necessary to successfully deliver the Sycamore Ave and Hwy 78 Sewer Capacity Improvements Project. The organizational structure is designed to promote clear lines of communication, accountability, and efficiency throughout all project phases. Our team is led by Principal-in-Charge Jason Caprio, PE, PMP and Project Manager Jean-Luc Delbecq, PE , who will serve as the primary point of contact and oversee day- to-day project execution, supported by key technical specialists in sewer rehabilitation, hydraulic modeling, permitting, and construction support. The following organization chart illustrates the reporting structure, key roles, and responsibilities, supporting a coordinated and seamless approach to meeting the City’s objectives.

City of Vista and
Buena Sanitation District
Project Manager: Jason Rivera, PE
Project Manager
Jean-Luc Delbecq, PE 🔑
Principal-in-Charge
Jason Caprio, PE, PMP 🔑
QA/QC Manager
Vern Phillips, PE
Design Services
Project Engineers
Johnny Ortega Ayon, PE
Amani Taraman, EIT
Trenchless Technologies
Vern Phillips, PE
Survey/ROW
Keith Hansen RCE, PLS [O]
🔑 Key Team Member
[O] O’Day Consultants
[S] Socotec/Ninyo & Moore
[T] T2UE
Support Services
Hydraulic Modeling
Taylor Fagan, PE
Permitting/Caltrans Coordination
William Garcia, PE
Geotechnical Investigation
William Morrison, PE, GE [S]
Potholing
Arthur Glen Robison, PE [T]
06/09/2026 C5 392 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.5. Project Team and Organization Chart  15 b. Project Roles

PRIME - HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
As Prime consultant, Harris will oversee and coordinate the project while providing all engineering, design, and environmental services to complete preliminary engineering studies, storm water pollution prevention design, permitting, final design and construction document preparation, and construction support services for the project. Harris is also 100% responsible for the success of the Scope of Work,
including satisfaction of the City team.

SUB-CONSULTANTS
O’Day Consultants, Inc. | Surveying & Mapping
Experience: O’Day Consultants, Inc. is a full-service civil engineering and land surveying firm with more than 40 years of experience supporting public works, utilities, and land development projects across Southern California. The firm delivers a comprehensive suite of services, including civil engineering design, land surveying, mapping, and consulting for government agencies and consulting firms. O’Day Consultants specializes in land development, street improvements, and the design of sewer, water, and stormwater infrastructure, providing technical expertise and responsive service for projects ranging from municipal improvements to industrial, commercial, and residential developments. Their longstanding presence and deep regional knowledge make them a trusted partner for surveying and engineering needs on complex infrastructure projects.

Ninyo & Moore, A Socotec Company | Geotechnical
Experience: Ninyo & Moore was established in San Diego in 1986 to provide exceptional geotechnical engineering, geologic, hydrogeologic, soil testing, materials testing and special inspection, and environmental consulting services to the public and private sectors. For the past 40 years, they have provided these services for the design and construction of municipal and commercial developments. They recently merged with SOCOTEC who is a leading player in testing, inspection and certification (TIC). Ninyo & Moore’s geotechnical group provides services during the planning, design, value engineering, construction and postconstruction phases of projects. These services include earthwork and grading, foundation design, geologic hazard evaluations, hydrogeologic evaluations, pavement design, seismic design and seismic hazard assessments.

T2 UES | Potholing
Experience: T2 UES, Inc. d/b/a T2 Utility Engineers (T2ue) delivers comprehensive utility engineering services, including Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE), advanced geophysics, potholing, surveying, and utility coordination for projects of any size. Leveraging a large fleet of field equipment and deep knowledge of the ASCE 38-22 Standard, T2ue produces accurate, defensible utility maps that capture both horizontal and vertical positions and often reveal 40–60% more utilities than records alone. Their approach reduces design conflicts, mitigates risks, compresses schedules, and minimizes
construction costs, enabling reliable and efficient infrastructure project planning and delivery.
c. Key Staff Experience
Jason Caprio, PE, PMP - Principal-in-
Charge
Jason has served in a leadership role for
numerous sewer projects, including two
recent progressive design-build projects for
the City of Vista, the Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer
Improvements and Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements. His responsibilities for both encompassed stakeholder coordination, preparation of design reports and construction drawings, and facilitating workshops with the City and project partners.

Jason’s approach emphasizes innovative problem-solving, such as developing alternative alignments to avoid costly permitting and reduce construction impacts.

In addition to his work for the City of Vista, Jason has managed and delivered sewer projects for agencies across Southern California, including the City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego, and City of National City. Jason’s leadership and technical acumen have resulted in reliable, cost-effective sewer solutions that address capacity deficiencies and support long-term community needs.

Jean-Luc Delbeqc, PE - Project Manager
Jean-Luc is a professional civil engineer
with over seven years of experience
specializing in pipeline infrastructure and
public works projects, including extensive
work on sewer and other gravity flow
systems. His expertise encompasses the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for sewer pipeline design, rehabilitation, and the application of trenchless technologies.

He is also experienced in master planning, hydraulic modeling, condition assessment, and capital improvement planning for wastewater collection systems. In the City of Vista, Jean-Luc served as Project Engineer for the Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements Project, where he led the design to convert an open concrete-lined drainage channel into a subsurface storm drain system with integrated trash capture and pedestrian- friendly landscaping. This project improved stormwater quality, safety, and aesthetics for the community. His work in Vista demonstrates his ability to deliver innovative, technically sound solutions for municipal infrastructure, drawing on his broad experience in both sewer and stormwater projects across California.
d. Resumes
Per the RFP, resumes for our team members, including
subconsultants, are located in the appendix.
06/09/2026 C5 393 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.5. Project Team and Organization Chart  16 e. Communication

COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION

APPROACH
Harris will implement a clear, streamlined communication structure centered on accountability, responsiveness, and alignment with the City/District’s preferred communication style.

All project communication will be coordinated through the District’s Project Manager, Jason Rivera, and Harris’ Project Manager, Jean-Luc Delbecq, who will serve as the single point of contact for all technical, schedule, and coordination matters.

This structure ensures that communication remains efficient, consistent, and well-documented throughout the duration of the project.

Recognizing that effective
communication is critical to
project success, Harris will tailor
communication methods to align
with the City/District’s and Jason
Rivera’s preferences. This includes
a flexible approach utilizing in-
person meetings, virtual meetings,
phone calls, emails, and text
communication, as appropriate, to support timely decision- making and maintain project momentum.

Jean-Luc Delbecq will be responsible for:
• Overall project delivery, including schedule and budget management
• Direct coordination with the District, Caltrans, and other stakeholders
• Management and integration of the Harris design team and all subconsultants
• Review and quality control of all deliverables prior to submittal
The Project Manager will be supported by the Jason Caprio, PE, PMP (PIC), who will provide executive oversight, strategic input, and independent quality assurance to ensure alignment with City/District expectations.

SUBCONSULTANT COORDINATION AND

ACCOUNTABILITY
Harris takes full ownership of communication and coordination with all subconsultant partners. All subconsultant interaction with the City/District will be coordinated through Harris, unless otherwise directed by the City/District, ensuring a clear and consistent flow of information.

Harris will lead regular internal coordination efforts to ensure that survey, geotechnical, and utility potholing activities are fully integrated into the design. We emphasize proactive communication, rapid issue resolution, and accountability across all team members, reducing the risk of delays or misalignment on technical deliverables.

COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS
To support efficient and responsive project delivery, Harris will implement the following:
• Single Point of Contact: Direct communication between the City/District PM and Harris PM
• Client-Preferred Communication: Adaptable communication methods based on City/District preferences
• Responsiveness Commitment: Timely responses (within
24 hours or less) to emails, calls, and requests, with clear ownership of follow-up actions
• Regular Progress Meetings: Milestone-based meetings (PDR, 30%, 60%, 90%, Final), with agendas and meeting minutes • Internal Team Coordination: Routine coordination meetings with subconsultants to track progress and resolve issues • Decision and Action Tracking: Use of meeting logs and comment matrices to ensure transparency and accountability This approach ensures that communication is proactive,
flexible, and responsive, while maintaining a clear structure that supports efficient project execution.

Project
Update
s

a
t

Y
o
u
r

Fingert
i
p
s
.

Stay
Informe
d
!
06/09/2026 C5 394 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.6. Experience  17

6. EXPERIENCE
a. Firm Experience Overview
Since 1974, Harris has developed a proven track record of delivering successful sewer design projects for public agencies.

Over the past five years, the firm has completed a wide range of sewer improvement projects, including capacity upgrades, rehabilitation, and replacement of aging infrastructure.

Notably, we served as the design engineer for the
City of Vista’s Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements
Project, which involved comprehensive design and
engineering services, coordinating with stakeholders and subconsultants to address hydraulic modeling, geotechnical investigations, and constructability challenges. Through innovative problem-solving, Harris engineered a solution that avoided complex permitting and reduced construction costs, demonstrating the firm’s ability to deliver cost-effective and practical outcomes for municipal clients.

We have extensive experience with a variety of sewer system improvements, including trunk main replacements, sanitary sewer rehabilitation, and the integration of trenchless technologies such as pipe bursting and cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining. The firm’s multidisciplinary teams have
supported cities like Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, National City, and San Diego with the planning, design, and construction management of sewer infrastructure projects often in constrained urban environments and under accelerated schedules. Our approach emphasizes stakeholder coordination, risk mitigation, and minimizing community disruption, resulting in reliable, resilient sewer systems that support long-term community needs.
b. Specialized Expertise
Harris offers specialized expertise in delivering the full scope of services required for complex sewer engineering projects, with a focus on technical excellence, stakeholder collaboration, and practical solutions tailored to public agency needs. The firm’s multidisciplinary teams have successfully managed all phases of sewer improvement projects, from initial condition assessment and hydraulic modeling to detailed design, permitting, and construction support. We employ industry-standard methods such as NASSCO PACP grading for pipeline condition
assessment, supplemented by field investigations and technical memoranda that guide rehabilitation or replacement strategies.

Our team is adept at integrating trenchless technologies including pipe bursting, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining, and sliplining to minimize community disruption, reduce construction costs, and extend the service life of existing infrastructure.

A hallmark of our approach is its rigorous constructability review process, which incorporates lessons learned from past projects and leverages in-house construction management expertise to identify and mitigate risks before construction begins. We provide comprehensive support for agency
coordination and regulatory compliance, drawing on deep experience with California’s permitting landscape and
environmental regulations. Our team navigates Caltrans
permitting requirements for sewer engineering projects, including the preparation and submittal of encroachment permit applications for work within state highway rights-of- way. The team coordinates closely with Caltrans staff to address technical submittals, traffic control plans, and compliance with agency standards, supporting timely project approvals and seamless construction activities.
c. Similar Projects and d. Key Staff Experience on Similar Projects For this project, we are highlighting experience in the City of Vista with sewer projects as well as with a regional project that has many similar characteristics to the Sycamore Ave & Hwy 78 project. The table below notes the three (3) selected projects as well as the key staff who worked on those projects and their roles. Detailed descriptions of the projects begin on the following page.

Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements
City of Vista
Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements
City of Vista
Sewer Force Main at G Street Pump Station
City of Chula Vista
Jason Caprio - Project Manager
Jean-Luc Delbecq - Project Engineer
Johnny Ortega Ayon - Supporting Engineer
Vern Phillips - Technical Advisor
Jason Caprio - Principal-in-Charge
Jean-Luc Delbecq - Project Manager
Vern Phillips - QA/QC Manager
Amani Taraman - Supporting Engineer
Taylor Fagan - Hydraulics Analysis
Jason Caprio - Project Manager
Johnny Ortega Ayon - Project Engineer
Vern Phillips - QA/QC Manager
Taylor Fagan - Hydraulics Analysis
06/09/2026 C5 395 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.6. Experience  18
Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements

CITY OF VISTA
Summary. This project addressed capacity-deficient sewer mains identified as priorities in the City’s Sewer Master Plan. Improvements included nearly 2,500 LF of 8-, 12-, 15-, and 18-inch diameter PVC sewer mains within both public right- of-way and private properties. Harris provided progressive design-build services, including preliminary investigations, field review, design analysis, and preparation of a preliminary design report, construction drawings, technical specifications, and environmental documentation. The project consisted of three sites: Eucalyptus Avenue and South Citrus Avenue, East Broadway, and Vista Magnet Middle School.

Challenges & Solutions. Project delivery required careful sequencing and phasing to minimize disruption to the City Hall and Vista Magnet Middle School. Harris coordinated with stakeholders, Orion Construction, and City staff through workshops to evaluate alternatives and refine design approaches. A full road closure and limited construction window were necessary at the school site; by aligning work with the summer break in June 2022, the team completed improvements within the eight-week closure period.

Success Story. The project successfully enhanced the City’s infrastructure by eliminating hydraulic insufficiencies, increasing sewer capacity, and extending the service life of the collection system. Deliverables met the City’s quality expectations and were delivered on schedule and within budget. Importantly, construction was completed without disrupting the academic calendar at Vista Magnet Middle School, demonstrating Harris’ ability to balance technical, community, and schedule priorities.

Schedule Acceleration and Permit Avoidance. Harris has a demonstrated ability to accelerate project delivery by identifying opportunities to avoid complex permitting pathways through thoughtful engineering and constructability-driven design. On this specific project, along South Citrus Avenue, Harris evaluated the proposed vertical alignment and developed an alternative profile that allowed the pipeline to traverse above an existing open channel, thereby avoiding jurisdictional impacts and the need for permitting through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This approach was validated through hydraulic modeling to confirm system performance and was implemented using a City-approved drop manhole configuration to maintain appropriate hydraulic transitions. The design also incorporated full encasement of the sewer main and targeted mitigation measures to protect adjacent infrastructure, waterways, and public safety. This strategy resulted in an estimated schedule savings of approximately 9 to 12 months, while maintaining regulatory compliance and overall project integrity.

PROJECT DETAILS
Project Location: Vista, CA
Owner Agency: City of Vista
Owner Agency Contacts:

Michael Hilker, Manager, Capital
Projects (previously with the City of
Vista)
(E): [email protected]
(P): 619.964.7789
Allison McLaughlin, Senior Engineer,
City of Vista
(E): [email protected]
(P): 760-643-5386
Construction Completion: March
2023
Design Completion: December 2021
 Completed On Time
 Completed On Budget
Key Project Elements:
• Sewer Main Replacement
• Basis of Design Report
• Hydraulic Modeling
• Encroachment Permits
• Private Property Coordination
• Pavement Restoration
• CEQA Documentation
• Construction Support
Installation of 18-inch diameter PVC sewer
main on South Citrus Avenue for a progressive
design-build partnership in the City of Vista.

Harris required full road closure and small
window for construction during late June
2022 with Vista Magnet Middle School campus
operations only closed for approximately 8
weeks.
06/09/2026 C5 396 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.6. Experience  19
Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements

CITY OF VISTA
Summary. The City of Vista required repair of an extensive shotcrete-lined channel due to compromised material integrity. The existing channel drained approximately 450 acres of densely developed residential and commercial space, as well as some pervious, steeply sloped hillsides, through a combination of open channels, culverts, and continuously piped networks. The Harris team used the rational method and the NRCS method to analyze runoff from the drainage catchments for the 25-year and 100-year return periods. Both methods were run to compare runoff flows, since the overall watershed was larger. The hydraulic analysis of the piped networks was completed using the WSPG hydraulic model, and the open channels were run using HEC-RAS. Interfaces between the open channel and the pipe network were completed through iterative model runs to ensure hydraulic grade lines matched the open channel and the outfalls.

Due to existing downstream site constraints, including undersized infrastructure, the overflow weir structure and parallel conveyances needed to be hydraulically modeled.

Alternative weir designs were analyzed to determine the required weir lengths and elevations to avoid impacts on upstream properties. The weir structure provided a safe release of flows onto the adjacent street, which matched how the existing channel worked for pre-project condition flows during the 25-year storm event.

The results of the hydraulic analysis were used to size new storm drain pipes that replaced the shotcrete-lined channel, as well as an overflow weir structure. Trash capture options were explored and incorporated into the design of the new storm drain piping, and included in the hydraulic analysis to determine potential hydraulic impacts from the trash capture devices.

Challenges & Solutions. Due to the existing downstream site constraints of having undersized infrastructure, an overflow weir structure needed to be designed to accommodate the required flows while avoiding impacts to upstream properties. The weir structure provided a safe release of flows onto the adjacent street, which matched how the existing channel worked for flows over the 25-year storm event.

PROJECT DETAILS
Project Location: Vista, CA
Owner Agency: City of Vista
Owner Agency Contacts:

Michael Hilker, Manager, Capital
Projects (previously with the City of
Vista)
(E): [email protected]
(P): 619.964.7789
Allison McLaughlin, Senior Engineer,
City of Vista
(E): [email protected]
(P): 760-643-5386
Construction Completion: January
2025
Design Completion: May 2024
 Completed On Time
 Completed On Budget
Key Project Elements:
• Storm Drain Infrastructure
• Hydrologic & Hydraulic Analysis
• Surveying
• Geotechnical Services
• Utility Locating
• Green Street Elements
• BMPs
• Basis of Design Report
• Landscaping and Beautification
• Coordination with HOA and
Local School
The Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements
Project will improve stormwater quality,
reduce operations and maintenance
challenges, improve aesthetics of Monte Mar
Road, reduce safety concerns, and broaden
pedestrian access.
06/09/2026 C5 397 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.6. Experience  20
Sewer Force Main at G Street Pump Station

CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Summary. This project involved the replacement of an existing 10-inch asbestos cement force main with two 12-inch high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipelines, approximately 1,200 LF, installed using horizontal directional drilling (HDD). The work was coordinated with the concurrent G Street Pump Station replacement project and included the relocation/replacement of approximately 62 LF of 12-inch ACP water main with PVC. HDD construction was selected to minimize disruptions to Collins Aerospace operations and to avoid numerous underground utilities within the project corridor.

Challenges & Solutions. The project faced significant constraints, including a congested urban footprint, contaminated soils that were costly to haul off, shallow groundwater with tidal influences, and the need to coordinate with multiple agencies.

Harris identified trenchless technology as the preferred installation method, reducing soil handling and groundwater challenges. The team also worked closely with the Sweetwater Authority to obtain Division of Drinking Water (DDW) waivers and implemented strict cost control measures by monitoring budgets, proactively addressing conflicts, and managing the non-local HDD subcontractor.

Success Story. Through effective coordination and communication, Harris delivered a design that integrated seamlessly with the multi-million-dollar G Street Pump Station replacement project. The improvements enhanced sewer reliability while minimizing construction impacts to both the community and Collins Aerospace. By employing trenchless technologies and strategic planning, Harris maintained schedule and budget alignment, demonstrating the firm’s expertise in managing complex, multi-stakeholder infrastructure projects.

Responsiveness to Client Needs. Harris has a proven track record of responding to critical client needs and aligning project delivery with high-visibility development schedules. For this project, Harris was directly connected to the success of the Bayfront redevelopment, including the Gaylord Pacific Resort. Recognizing that the introduction of new wastewater flows, and the resort’s grand opening, were dependent on the timely completion of the project, Harris worked in close coordination with the City to accelerate design efforts, prioritize critical path activities, and maintain an aggressive schedule. This included proactive communication, rapid response to City input, and real-time problem solving to address evolving project conditions. Through this collaborative and solutions-oriented approach, Harris successfully delivered the project in alignment with the City’s deadlines, supporting a landmark development for the community and ultimately sharing in the City’s success as the Bayfront vision was realized.

PROJECT DETAILS
Project Location: Chula Vista, CA
Owner Agency: City of Chula Vista
Owner Agency Contact: Jonathan
Salsman, PE, Principal Civil Engineer
(E): [email protected]
(P): 619.397.6115
Construction Completion: May 2025
Design Completion: July 2023
 Completed On Time
 Completed On Budget
Key Project Elements:
• Sewer Replacement
• MTS Permitting
• Utility Coordination
• Horizontal Directional Drilling
• Right-of-Way and Easement
Coordination
Harris coordinated our sophisticated
trenchless technologies design with
the connected G Street Pump Station
replacement, including working closely with
the Sweetwater Authority as the public water
purveyor in the area to obtain DDW waivers
for the extremely congested project footprint.
06/09/2026 C5 398 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.7. References  21

7. REFERENCES
Client: City of Vista
Location: Vista, CA
Number of Projects Completed for Client PM: 2* - Eucalyptus-Citrus Sewer Improvements and Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements
Client Contact: Michael Hilker, Manager, Capital Projects (previously with the City of Vista) 619.964.7789
Client: City of Palm Springs
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Number of Projects Completed for Client PM: 3*
Client Contact: Andrew Crider, Senior Civil Engineer, 760.219.5356 Client: City of San Diego, Engineering & Capital Projects Location: San Diego, CA
Number of Projects Completed for Client PM: 4*
Client Contact: Bilal Oriqat, Associate Engineer – Civil, 619.533.7460 * Note: These totals are specific to the listed City Contact. Harris successfully completed numerous additional projects with each of the listed Cities. “ I had the pleasure of working
with Jason Caprio and the
Southern California Water Market
team at Harris on two successful
Progressive Design-Build projects;
one for wastewater and one for
storm water. Jason has a deep
understanding of collaborative
project delivery methods, and his
technical skills paired with highly
qualified contractors drive best
value and mitigate risk during
construction. Building a team to
meet the needs of a project is a
critical task, and whether pursuing
design-build or design-bid-build,
you need team members like Jason
to reach the finish line.”
— Michael Hilker, DBIA, Manager,
Capital Projects
(Previously with City of Vista)

8. HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Our team’s hourly rate schedules have been uploaded separately per the City’s OpenGov submittal portal.

Harris prepared a complete Fee Estimate for this project, however within the OpenGov submittal portal, there is not a location to include it at this time. We are able to send it directly to the City if requested, or wait until after the Interview stage as noted in the RFP.

9. EXCEPTIONS TO THE RFP
Harris & Associates has read, understands, and takes no exception to the RFP or the terms of the District’s Standard Consulting Agreement.

10. ADDENDA TO THE RFP
Harris & Associates has received Addenda #1 dated March 20, 2026. A signed copy of the required form is located in the appendix. 06/09/2026 C5 399 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.Appendix: Resumes  22
APPENDIX: RESUMES
06/09/2026 C5 400 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  23

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer, CA

CERTIFICATIONS
Project Management Professional
(PMP), PMI No. 2163514

AFFILIATIONS
APWA American Public Works
Association (APWA)
AWWA American Water Works
Association (AWWA)
American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
Design-Build Institute of America
(DBIA)
Jason Caprio, PE, PMP 🔑
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE | HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
Jason brings 20 years of experience delivering wastewater conveyance projects through design and construction in active, constrained corridors, with a focus on constructible sequencing, service continuity, and multi-stakeholder coordination. As a PMP-certified project manager, Jason applies disciplined project controls—clear communication, schedule and budget management, and proactive risk tracking—to produce bid-ready documents that reduce uncertainty in the field and help minimize disruptions, change orders, and claims. His delivery approach is well-suited to projects involving facility retirement/abandonment planning, in-service interceptor rehabilitation, and coordination across multiple jurisdictions from preliminary design through construction support.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Vista, Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements Project. Project Manager. The project consisted of improving capacity deficient sewer mains identified as priority within the City’s Sewer Master Plan. The improvements included nearly 2,500 linear feet of 8-inch, 12-inch, 15-inch, and 18-inch diameter PVC sewer mains within public right-of-way and on private properties. Harris provided design and engineering services as part of the progressive design- build procurement, including coordination with stakeholders, detailed preliminary design report, construction drawings, and workshops with Orion Construction and the City of Vista.

Harris partnered with Akel Engineering Group for hydraulic modeling and Ninyo & Moore for geotechnical engineering. As Project Manager, Jason was responsible for coordination with all subconsultants and stakeholders, making sure the project remained on track in regards to the schedule and budget. During the design process, the Harris team proposed and engineered a solution that avoided installation of a 12-inch diameter PVC sewer main beneath a deep, reinforced concrete culvert. This creative alternative eliminated permitting influences from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), avoided future operations and maintenance nightmares, and significantly reduced construction costs for that portion of sanitary sewer system improvements.
• City of Vista, Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements Project. Project Manager. The City of Vista required repair of an extensive shotcrete-lined channel due to the material integrity of the channel. The existing channel drained approximately 450 acres of densely developed residential commercial space as well as some pervious steeply sloped hillsides draining through a combination of open channels, culverts and continuously piped networks. The Harris team utilized rational method and NRCS method to analyze the runoff of the drainage catchments for the 25-year and 100-year return periods. The results of the hydraulic analysis were used to size new storm drain pipes that replaced the shotcrete-lined channel, as well as an overflow weir structure. Trash capture options were explored and implemented into the design of the new storm drain piping, and were included in the hydraulic analysis to determine potential hydraulic impacts from the trash capture devices.
• City of Chula Vista, G Street Sewer Force Main. Project Manager. Jason served as Project Manager, overseeing the replacement of a deteriorating 10-inch asbestos cement force main with two 12-inch high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipelines totaling 1,200 feet.

He led the planning and design for trenchless construction methods, including horizontal directional drilling (HDD) and jack-and-bore installation beneath an inactive MTS rail line, and coordinated closely with Sweetwater Authority and the Department of Drinking Water to resolve utility conflicts, maintain the project schedule, and deliver reliable system improvements under complex site conditions.

KEY STAFF
06/09/2026 C5 401 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  24

EDUCATION
BS, Environmental Engineering

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer, CA
Jean-Luc Delbecq, PE 🔑
PROJECT MANAGER | HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
Jean-Luc has over seven years of experience in civil design with an emphasis in pipeline infrastructure. He is well-versed in the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for a variety of public works projects, including but not limited to water and wastewater (pipeline design and rehabilitation, trenchless technology) and demolition projects. Jean-Luc also has experience with preparation of master plans for water and wastewater systems, including planning-level system analyses and creation of capital improvement plans for infrastructure.

He has experience with hydraulic modeling of both water and wastewater systems, completing supply & storage analyses, and evaluating systems for capacity deficiencies.

Jean-Luc utilized regional standard drawings where appropriate, but also created custom details for some of the proposed structures to deal with unique project aspects such as flooding and overflows, parallel structure connections, and implementation of trash capture devices.
• City of Vista, Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements Project. Project Engineer. The project consisted of improving capacity deficient sewer mains identified as priority within the City’s Sewer Master Plan. The improvements included nearly 2,500 linear feet of 8-inch, 12-inch, 15-inch, and 18-inch diameter PVC sewer mains within public right-of-way and on private properties. Harris provided design and engineering services as part of the progressive design-build procurement, including coordination with stakeholders, detailed preliminary design report, construction drawings, and workshops with Orion Construction and the City of Vista. Jean-Luc supported the design of the construction contract documents for the sewer improvements, including basemapping existing utilities and drafting proposed sewer alignments.
• City of San Diego, Design of Storm Water Pump Station D Component Upgrade. Project Engineer. Harris is providing preliminary engineering, CEQA documentation and permitting, design, bid support, and construction support services to upgrade and increase service capacity at Pump Station D. All site work during construction will require temporary bypassing of the pump station. Jean-Luc is supporting the design development for the proposed pump station, including preparation of design drawings, technical specifications, and the engineer’s opinion of probable construction costs (EOPCC). Additionally, Jean-Luc supports the project management tasks, coordinating with a multitude of various subconsultants, stakeholders, and client project managers.

KEY STAFF
06/09/2026 C5 402 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  25

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer, CA

RELEVANT TRAININGS
American Management Institute,
Project Management Pipeline
Rehabilitation
Vern Phillips, PE
QA/QC MANAGER | HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
Vern has over 40 years of experience in providing program management and civil design for public agencies’ improvement projects. He has extensive pipeline and pump station experience for sewer and storm drain facilities, potable and reclaimed water forcemains, saltwater, and dredging pipelines. His skills include technical oversight and quality control for projects during construction, the preparation of project construction documents, and program management of public works and capital improvement projects. Vern is a nationally recognized expert in trenchless technology for pipe construction and experienced in the usage of all pipe materials, from plastic pipe to welded steel pipe to ductile iron pipe. He takes an active role in advancing the practice of trenchless technology through regularly publishing technical papers, speaking at professional forums, and participating in numerous professional associations. He has been responsible for creating design solutions for more than 100 trenchless projects, helping his clients save money and mitigate challenges during both design and construction. He developed the first specifications for cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining, microtunneling, and pipe bursting as a member of the APWA Greenbook Committee in 1998.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Vista, Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements Project. QA/QC Manager. The project consisted of improving capacity deficient sewer mains identified as priority within the City’s Sewer Master Plan. The improvements included nearly 2,500 linear feet of 8-inch, 12-inch, 15-inch, and 18-inch diameter PVC sewer mains within public right-of-way and on private properties. Harris provided design and engineering services as part of the progressive design- build procurement, including coordination with stakeholders, detailed preliminary design report, construction drawings, and workshops with Orion Construction and the City of Vista. Vern was responsible for contract requirements, quality assurance/quality control management, and monitoring the performance of the Harris team. • City of Chula Vista, Sewer Force Main at G Street Pump Street Pump Station Upgrades. QA/ QC Manager/Technical Lead. Due to a growing population and redevelopment of property around G Street, the City needed to upgrade an aging asbestos cement pipe sewer force main and the pump station that served it. There was also known environmental contamination in the water and soil, so hazardous material remediation was anticipated. Harris was selected to design the improvements for the new dual, force main. To minimize dewatering and handling hazmat during excavation, trenchless construction methods for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) and auger boring was selected. Heavy wall, DR 9 HDPE pipe with butt-fusion joints will provide a leakproof and seismic resistant pipeline. Vern was responsible for advising the team in the trenchless construction techniques and overall quality control/quality assurance. • City of San Diego, 16-inch and Larger Cast Iron Water Main and Sewer Replacement Group A. QA/QC Manager. The $6.4 million design-build project includes design and replacement of approximately 6,800 LF of 8-, 10-, 12-, 16-, and 18-inch diameter cast iron and asbestos cement water pipeline and replacement of approximately 1,400 LF of 6-, 8-, 12-, and 15-inch diameter concrete pipe and vitrified clay sewer main. As an amendment to the original work, our team designed a terminus section of the Pure Water Program consisting of a 36-inch diameter cement mortar-lined and –coated steel water main with custom concrete access vault. Caltrans coordination and design efforts were also required for a 24-inch diameter steel casing beneath both Interstate 5 and the Mid-Coast Transit Constructor work. Vern was responsible for high- level oversight of project deliverables.
06/09/2026 C5 403 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  26

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer, CA
Johnny Ortega Ayon, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER | HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
Johnny has eight years of experience in civil design. His skills include utility research, AutoCAD drafting, Microstation drafting, assisting with submittals and permits, sewer pipeline assessment, and project coordination. He has contributed to the development of plans and specifications for a wide variety of utility projects for public agencies, and is skilled at successfully preparing bid documents with clarity and detail meeting agency standards.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Vista, Eucalyptus Citrus Sewer Improvements Project. Design Engineer. The project consisted of improving capacity deficient sewer mains identified as priority within the City’s Sewer Master Plan. The improvements included nearly 2,500 linear feet of 8-inch, 12-inch, 15-inch, and 18-inch diameter PVC sewer mains within public right-of-way and on private properties. Harris provided design and engineering services as part of the progressive design- build procurement, including coordination with stakeholders, detailed preliminary design report, construction drawings, and workshops with Orion Construction and the City of Vista.

Johnny was responsible for AutoCAD drafting, utility research, and right of way research. • City of San Diego, Design of Storm Water Pump Station D Component Upgrade. Design Engineer. The project consists of the installation of approximately 350 linear feet of 24-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) storm drains, including associated cut-off walls for steep terrain installations, concrete energy dissipators, riprap, slope repair, and revegetation.

The work is located in the University City neighborhood of San Diego. Harris’ scope of services includes design (plans, specifications, and engineers’ opinion of probable construction costs), environmental compliance and regulatory agency permitting, bid and award support, and engineering support during construction. Harris will be required to perform research studies, reviews, and coordination necessary to finalize the design and prepare the plans and specifications using the latest applicable City of San Diego design and construction standards.

Johnny is responsible for leading the CAD portion of the design drawings. • City of San Diego/Orion Construction, Catalina 12-inch Cast Iron Water Mains and Sewer Mains. Design Engineer. This $18.9 million design-build project consisted of replacing of 14,000 LF of sewer main with eight- and ten-inch polyvinyl chloride, relocating approximately 5,000 LF of sewer main from easement to right-of-way with eight-inch polyvinyl chloride pipe, and installing over 60 sewer replumbs. The team investigated using horizontal directional drilling as a trenchless alternative to open trench construction. Johnny was responsible for the field work to verify utilities, AutoCAD drafting, utility research, and right of way research. • City of San Diego, 16-inch and Larger Cast Iron Water Main and Sewer Replacement Project Group A. Design Engineer. The improvements consisted of replace-in-place and abandonment of water mains at six locations throughout the City. Johnny was responsible for verification of utilities, utility research, field visits, Microstation drafting, thrust block calculations, and research on City of San Diego CAD and drawing standards. • City of Anaheim/Teichert Energy & Utilities Group, Imperial Highway & Big Sky Lane Water Main. Project Engineer. The Imperial Highway & Big Sky Lane Project is a design-build procurement that addresses structurally deficient water mains located in the City of Anaheim.

The project requires design and construction of new and fully function water mains and appurtenances within the project vicinity. The work also includes utility coordination, basis of design reports, permitting, phasing, shutdowns, geotechnical investigation and reporting, traffic control planning, and street restoration.
06/09/2026 C5 404 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  27

EDUCATION
BS, Environmental Engineering

CERTIFICATIONS
Engineer-in-Training (EIT), CA
Amani Taraman, EIT
PROJECT ENGINEER | HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
Amani Taraman, EIT, is an environmental engineer who supports municipal infrastructure projects involving stormwater, drainage, and wastewater systems. She contributes to engineering design, permitting, and construction support for complex public works projects, including storm drain upgrades, pump station improvements, and sewer rehabilitation. Amani assists with hydraulic and hydrologic analysis, preparation of plans, specifications, and probable construction costs, and coordination with regulatory agencies to meet City and State standards. She also supports stakeholder coordination and project communications with affected communities and institutions, including local schools and universities, to facilitate permitting and minimize construction impacts. Having completed her lower leves of education in Orange County and maintaining a connection to the region through family attending California State University, Fullerton, Amani brings familiarity with the local academic community that supports effective engagement with campus stakeholders. Her technical training and strong communication skills allow her to effectively bridge engineering teams, regulatory agencies, and community partners to support successful project delivery.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Vista, Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements Project. Project Engineer. The City of Vista maintains an existing concrete-lined drainage channel (existing channel) along a portion of Monte Mar Road between East Vista Way and Oak Drive, which was constructed and/or repaired using shotcrete and other methods. The material integrity of the existing channel is severely deteriorated with only the upper portions of the existing channel remaining as concrete lined. The existing channel is both an under-performing instrument for the conveyance of stormwater and presents safety and vector issues in its current state. The Project’s goal is to convert the existing open channel to a subsurface storm drain conveyance, system outfitted with a trash capture device, and landscaped with a pedestrian-friendly surface above, the Project will improve stormwater quality, reduce operations and maintenance challenges, improve aesthetics of Monte Mar Road, reduce safety concerns, and improve pedestrian access. Amani assisted with the field work to verify utilities and assisted with contractor submittals during construction.
• City of San Diego, Design of Storm Water Pump Station D Component Upgrade. Intern/ Project Engineer. Harris is providing preliminary engineering, CEQA documentation and permitting, design, bid support, and construction support services to upgrade Stormwater Pump Station D. The project will increase the current capacity from approximately 135,000 gpm to 270,000 gpm to mitigate flooding upstream of the station, add a new emergency generator and upgrade all associated mechanical and electrical systems, utilities, and structures. Amani is supporting the preparation of plans, specifications, and probable construction costs, as well as regulatory permitting, bid support, and engineering services during construction. She also provided a light utility conflict check for the project. • City of San Diego, Adams North Storm Drain Replacement Project. Intern/Project Engineer.

This project consists of approximately 1,700 linear feet of 18-inch and 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) storm drain, including concrete catch basins with curb inlets, energy dissipators, riprap, and cut-off walls for steep terrain installations. Additional improvements include ADA-compliant curb ramps, pavement restoration, and potential water and sewer main relocations requiring coordination with the Division of Drinking Water. Amani is supporting the preparation of plans, specifications, and probable construction costs and is providing coordination to both public and private utility owners. 06/09/2026 C5 405 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  28
Taylor Fagan, PE, ENV SP
HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS ANALYST | HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
With four years of experience in water resources, Taylor is familiar with performing hydrologic and hydraulic analyses to route flow, determine peak flow, and generate storm hydrographs. She also has experience with designing water distribution systems and stormwater collection systems through hand calculations and hydraulic modeling programs, such as WaterCAD, HEC RAS, and EPA NET. In addition, Taylor is also familiar with environmental compliance work.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Vista, Monte Mar Storm Drain Improvements - Hydrology and Hydraulics Analysis.

Design Engineer. The project included repair of the roadway and a redesign of the drainage system to convert an open channel drainage ditch to a closed conduit system. Taylor assisted the team with the hydrologic calculations and modeling using various software (ArcGIS and HEC HMS). The hydrologic modeling and calculations allowed the team to delineate the drainage area and estimate the peak runoff at the site. Because the project area consisted of a combination of open channel and closed conduit segments, Taylor modeled the system hydraulics using both HEC RAS and WSPG to best model the behavior of the stormwater within these varying conveyance systems.
• City of San Diego, Barrett Camp Emergency Storm Drain Repair - Hydrology and Hydraulics Analysis. Design Engineer. This project included the emergency repair of Barrett Camp Road in San Diego and a redesign of the drainage culvert conveying runoff below the roadway.

For the culvert design, the drainage area was delineated in GIS and modeled in HEC-HMS following the local methodology to determine the design flow rates. Taylor utilized HEC RAS to model the open channel hydraulics and size the drainage culverts based on the flow rates from HEC HMS. HY-8 was utilized for confirming the HEC RAS model results. Taylor prepared the hydraulic models using topographic survey data and site visit observations as well as DEM data from the County’s GIS data for areas where information was not available. • Monterey County, Toro Park Water System Improvements - Hydraulic Analysis. Design Engineer. This project includes the design and preparation of the plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) for the proposed well and booster station upgrades and new irrigation distribution system. The design included improving the well’s pumping capabilities for irrigation purposes, eliminating the need to purchase potable water. Taylor performed hydraulic analyses using EPANET to model and size the new irrigation distribution system and is part of the design team preparing the plans, specifications, and estimate. • City of Soledad, Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements - Hydraulic Analysis. Design Engineer. This project included the retrofit of the City’s existing recycled water pump station located at their wastewater treatment plant to supply recycled water to the City’s parks and landscaping for irrigation purposes. To retrofit the pump station to meet the recycled water demands, Taylor utilized WaterCAD to model the pump station, recycled water distribution system, and recycled water demands. The model results were used to confirm the pump station could meet the demands without over-cycling of the pumps and to identify necessary improvements to the City’s recycled water pump station and distribution system. • Monterey County, River Road Emergency Project - Hydraulic Analysis. Design Engineer. The project included emergency repair of the roadway and a redesign of the drainage system to accommodate the increased runoff and debris flows resulting from previous wildfires within the watershed. Taylor performed hydraulic analyses using HEC RAS and WSPG to model the open channel hydraulics of the existing conditions and the proposed alternatives based on information gathered from field visits and topographic survey. These models were used for sizing two 268-foot long, 48-inch circular culverts and for performing scour analyses for designing slope protection measures.

EDUCATION
MS, Civil and Environmental
Engineering
BS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer, PE
#95873

CERTIFICATIONS
Envision Sustainability Professional
(ENV SP), ISI
06/09/2026 C5 406 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  29

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering
BA, German

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer, CA (PE)
Professional Civil Engineer, CO

CERTIFICATIONS
OSHA 30-Hour Construction
William Garcia, PE
PERMITTING AND COORDINATION - CALTRANS | HARRIS & ASSOCIATES William brings 13 years of experience delivering sewer, storm drain and utility infrastructure projects from preliminary design through construction. He has performed both design and project management for countless projects within the public works field. A number of these projects include coordination and obtaining approvals from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). William leverages his experience working with working with Caltrans standards, manuals, and district review practices to develop designs, permitting approaches and documentation that align with agency expectations from the outset.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Chula Vista, Sewer Rehabilitation & Upsize Telegraph Canyon Basin (Industrial Blvd). Project Manager. This project involves replacing and upsizing an existing gravity sewer within a highly constrained urban corridor in the City of Chula Vista. In accordance with the City’s Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, this project involves upsizing an existing 15- inch sewer line to an 18-inch diameter to accommodate increased flow demand. The upgrade is driven by anticipated capacity needs due to a new upstream development currently under construction. The project began in early 2026 and William is serving as the Project Manager for the design and will be overseeing the Metropolitan Transit System and Caltrans permitting. • City of San Diego, Morena Boulevard Bridge Water Pipeline Replacement Project. Project Manager. This project consists of replacing approximately 2,000 linear feet of existing 16- inch diameter water piping, approximately 1,000 linear feet of which is mounted to the City’s Morena Boulevard bridge. Approximately half of the overall project alignment is located within Caltrans right-of-way, including a portion of the bridge-mounted pipeline. As well as managing the overall project, William is leading the complex and sizable effort of obtaining all necessary approvals, including construction encroachment permits, traffic control, bridge structural analysis, and cooperative agreements for water appurtenances within Caltrans right- of-way. By leveraging his experience with Caltrans policies, and internal workflows, William is steamlining the approval process, anticipating potential review challenges, and ultimately ensuring the project remains on schedule while meeting all state requirements. • City of San Diego, Adams North Storm Drain Replacement Project. Project Manager. This project consists of the construction of approximately 1,700 linear feet of 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe storm drain piping (and associated appurtenances) across 6 locations within the City of San Diego. One of the project sites drains into Caltrans right-of-way, requiring coordination and approval with Caltrans. William is leading this process, working with Caltrans to identify limitations in drainage modification, which ultimately impact allowable project improvements. William is the liaison between Caltrans and the City, assisting the City to understand Caltrans requirements and evaluate potential modifications to the project scope to best accomplish the City’s drainage improvement in respect to these requirements. • City of Dixon, 27” Sewer Improvements Project. Project Manager. This project consisted of the rehabilitation of approximately 3.5 miles of 27” vitrified clay pipe sewer main within the City of Dixon. A large portion of the project improvements were within Caltrans right- of-way. During the design phase of the project, William worked with Caltrans to obtain the necessary approvals, including preliminary outreach and Environmental coordination, as well as obtaining an encroachment permit to facilitate construction work. During construction of the project, the City hired Harris to perform Construction Management and Inspection services, during which William continued to proactively coordinate with Caltrans as well as the Contractor to ensure that all Caltrans permitting and closeout requirements were met. 06/09/2026 C5 407 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  30

EDUCATION
MS, Geological Engineering
BS, Geology

REGISTRATION
Professional Geologist, CA #2468
Professional Engineer, CA #52618
Professional Engineer, AZ #29013
Professional Engineer, NV #19274

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
William Morrison, PE, GE
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS | SOCOTEC (FORMERLY NINYO & MOORE) William is an experienced engineer with over 37 years of experience in Southern California. His role during design includes develop the field and laboratory testing programs; review the boring logs; assign laboratory tests; review test results; perform and oversee geotechnical analysis; and prepare geotechnical reports. Mr. Morrison has been retained as a Subject Matter Expert by the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Geologists during the development, grading, and standard setting of the 1999-2025 Geotechnical Engineering registration examinations.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Padre Dam Municipal Water District, Inverted Sewer Siphon & Sludge Main Improvement.

Principal Engineer. The proposed pipeline alignment is located crossing underneath the San Diego River and Forester Creek between Carlton Oaks Drive and Mission Gorge Road. The pipeline conveys flow between the PDMWD Ray Stoyer Water Recycling Facility to the City of San Diego sewer collection system. This project includes the replacement of approximately 2,600 lineal feet of the existing sludge main. The pipeline consists of 16-inch diameter ductile iron pipe, 14- and 16-inch diameter asbestos cement pipe, 14-and 16-inch diameter ductile iron pipe, and 24-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe. Possible construction methods for the new pipeline were conventional, open trench techniques, and/or trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting, horizontal directional drilling, or cured in place pipe (CIPP) lining in order to cross below the San Diego River. Services included a subsurface exploration consisting of the drilling, sampling, and logging of six small-diameter borings to depths up to approximately 61½ feet; geotechnical laboratory testing; data compilation and engineering analysis; and preparation of a report presenting our findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding the geotechnical aspects of the design and construction of the project. • City of Fallbrook, South Mission Road Phase II Sewer Main Design. Senior Engineer The South Mission Sewer Main Replacement Phase II project, included the construction of approximately 1,000-feet of new 18-inch sewer in South Mission Road, north and south of Aviation Road. Approximately 400 feet of the northern portion of the alignment was constructed by the jack-and-bore tunneling method. Services included performance of a geotechnical reconnaissance of the site; drilling, logging, and sampling of exploratory borings; performance of laboratory testing on soil samples; and preparation of a geotechnical evaluation report which provided geotechnical conclusions and recommendations were provided relative to design and construction of the project.
• City of San Diego, Manning Canyon Water and Sewer Replacement and Sewer Rehabilitation. Senior Engineer. The Manning Canyon Water and Sewer Replacement and Sewer Rehabilitation project involved the replacement and rehabilitation of existing sewer and water lines, and repair and abandoned existing sewer lines and laterals. The existing water lines were replaced on Lanston Street, from Comstock Street to approximately 1050 feet to the west; on Comstock Street, from Lanston Street to Manning Street; and on Langmuir Street, to approximately 260 feet to the south. The new water lines are 8- and 12-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe. The roadways were paved with asphalt concrete and the surrounding properties were generally developed for residential use. The construction was performed using both trenchless and open trench methods. Services included review of background information; performance of geophysical locating of sewer laterals for five locations; performance of a subsurface exploration consisting of drilling, logging, and sampling of soil borings; laboratory testing of selected samples; and preparation of an illustrated geotechnical evaluation report providing our findings, conclusions, and geotechnical recommendations to assist in the design and construction of the project.
06/09/2026 C5 408 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  31

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer (Civil), CA
#60223
Professional Land Surveyor (PLS)
#9974

CERTIFICATIONS
Qualified SWPPP Developer/
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner,
CASQA #00181
Keith Hansen, PE, PLS, QSD/P
PROJECT SURVEY MANAGER | O’DAY CONSULTANTS
Keith brings 29 years of experience managing surveying and civil engineering work for public infrastructure projects throughout Southern California. As Director of Engineering at O’Day Consultants, he oversees base mapping, right-of-way analysis, and construction staking and provides technical guidance across all survey scopes. His recent work on the City of San Clemente’s Calafia Complete Streets Project included directing control establishment, aerial topography, and detailed field mapping across a complex coastal corridor. He coordinated survey crews, confirmed horizontal and vertical control, and ensured all topographic, utility, and right-of-way data supported roadway, pedestrian, and bikeway design needs. His understanding of agency standards, field conditions, and mapping requirements ensures survey deliverables remain accurate, coordinated, and ready for design..

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of San Clemente, Calafia Complete Streets – Survey Services. Surveyor. As survey lead with detailed mapping for a constrained coastal roadway corridor. His responsibilities included establishing horizontal and vertical control, directing aerial and field survey operations, and overseeing development of one-foot contour topography and full planimetric mapping across approximately ten acres. Keith coordinated monument recovery, right-of-way verification, and utility data collection to ensure accurate base mapping for design. He provided technical oversight for the integration of field data into AutoCAD Civil 3D and delivered survey products that supported roadway narrowing, sidewalk infill, bikeway improvements, and permitting through the California Coastal Commission
• City of Carlsbad, El Camino Real Widening. Surveyor. Keith supported the widening and full improvement of El Camino Real from Cannon Road to Tamarack Avenue, a corridor that included multiple intersections, utility corridors, and drainage facilities. His work included overseeing aerial mapping, field surveying, and construction staking for the roadway and associated utilities. He provided technical input on grading, storm drain, water, and sewer improvements and coordinated with utility providers, including PacBell, SDG&E, and Kinder Morgan, to address potential conflicts. Keith also prepared base mapping, legal descriptions, and right-of-way exhibits and supported plan production for roadway widening, traffic signals, signing and striping, and water quality features. This work delivered accurate mapping and staking for a complex, multi-year corridor improvement. • City of Escondido, Rock Springs Road Improvements. Project Manager Survey. As a subconsultant to NCM Engineering for the County of San Diego, O’Day Consultants provided a field survey topo, street cross sections, and potholing for street widening and drainage design along Rock Springs Road (C1631) in the unincorporated North County Metro area North of SR-78 and northwest of I-15 between the City of Escondido-County Boundary and the City of San Marcos Boundary.
06/09/2026 C5 409 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes  32

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer (PE), CA
No.78222

CERTIFICATIONS
NASSCO P / M / LACP: U-0120-
70308258

AFFILIATIONS
American Public Works Association
(APWA)
American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
Arthur Glen Robison, PE
POTHOLING | T2 UTILITY ENGINEERS
Glen has over 20 years of civil engineering, due diligence, design, and project management experience. His expertise is in Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE), land development, site design, water quality management plans, road widening and rehabilitation, storm drain and drainage, water and sewer facilities, signing and striping, retaining walls and traffic handling services for a variety of private and municipal agencies. Glen is well versed in all aspects of utility investigations including research, mapping, field investigations, survey, design, and deliverable production. As a California Registered Professional Engineer, Glen certifies and seals deliverables against negligent errors and omissions and assures the standards of care for all utility investigations are achieved.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Orange County Sanitation District, Project No. 2-49. Engineer-in-Charge. Glen served as Engineer-in-Charge for ASCE 38 compliant SUE services for the Taft Branch Sewer Improvement Project. Project responsibilities included review of geophysical utility designating, utility records reconciliation, deliverable production, traffic control plans for City Encroachment Permits, and SUE Plan submittals.
• Orange County Sanitation, Project No. 5-67. Engineer-in-Charge. Glen served as Engineer- in-Charge for ASCE 38 compliant SUE services for the Bayside Sewer Pump Station and Dual Force Main Replacement Project. Project responsibilities included review of geophysical utility designating, utility records reconciliation, deliverable production, traffic control plans for City and Caltrans Encroachment Permits, and SUE Plan submittals. • Los Angeles Community College District, Energy Efficiency/Utility Infrastructure, Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Services. Engineer-in-Charge. Glen serves as Engineer- in-Charge for ASCE 38 compliant SUE services for ten Los Angeles Community College Campuses. The scope includes providing geophysical utility designating, testholes (potholes), survey and deliverable production and submittals. He also manages and reports review of subcontractor utility condition assessments and topographical survey. • Metropolitan Water District, Iron Mountain Pumping Plant. Project Manager. Glen performed design management and layout of existing subsurface and overhead utilities for the Iron Mountain Pumping Plant.
• City of Long Beach, Large Potable Water Valve Replacement Project – Redondo Ave and Kilroy Way. Traffic Control Engineer. Glen served as Traffic Control Engineer for the design of traffic control plans for large valve replacements on miscellaneous domestic water pipelines, including a 650LF 36-in bypass water pipeline. His responsibilities included the creation of traffic control plans and detour plans that conformed to the California MUTCD for Streets and Highways and municipality standards.
06/09/2026 C5 410 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.Appendix: Addenda Acknowledgment  33 APPENDIX: ADDENDA

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
06/09/2026 C5 411 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.Appendix: Addenda Acknowledgment  34

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ),
FOR

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES

SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
CIP 8396 – SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78
Addendum No. 1
March 20, 2026

All Contractual Requirements as defined within the Contract Documents shall remain in full force to the extent that they are not modified or in conflict with the attached addendum.

A. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

06/09/2026 C5 412 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.Appendix: Addenda Acknowledgment  35

06/09/2026 C5 413 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.Appendix: Addenda Acknowledgment  36

06/09/2026 C5 414 of 422

Harris & Associates, Inc.Appendix: Addenda Acknowledgment  37 Q9 (OpenGov-Question 9) Final Design Task
SoCal Marketing Mar 3 2026 at 11:47 AM
Carollo Engineers
In the Final Design task, the Final Submittal subtask states: "Consultant shall obtain the required signatures from reviewers on the original mylars." Are mylars required for the project, they are not mentioned in the subsequent list of deliverables.

A9 (OpenGov-Question 9)
Mylars will not be required. A signed paper copy is adequate with signatures will be scanned and uploaded.

I hereby acknowledge that I have received Addendum No. 1 and its provisions have been incorporated into the attached bid proposal.

_______________________________________________________________________ By

____________________________________ ________________________ Company Date

END OF ADDENDUM NO. 1

Harris & Associates March 26, 2026
06/09/2026 C5 415 of 422

Phase/Task $315 $295 $245 $225 $175 $145 Geotechnical Surveying Potholing 5%1% Task 1.0 Project Management and Coordination

1.1 General Project Management and Administration 8 60 16 18,340$ -$ $0 $183 18,523$

1.2 Kickoff Meeting 2 4 1,530$ -$ $0 $15 1,545$

1.3 Coordination with Subconsultants 2 8 8 3,590$ -$ $0 $36 3,626$

1.4 QA/QC 40 4 4 13,400$ -$ $0 $134 13,534$ Subtotal Hours =12 40 0 76 4 24
Subtotal ($) =$3,780 $11,800 $0 $17,100 $700 $3,480 $36,860 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 369$ 37,229$ Task 2.0 Investigations and Preliminary Engineering

2.1 Research, Data Collection, and Investigations 4 8 12 4,040$ -$ $0 $40 4,080$

2.2 Review of Previous Reports and Available Materials 8 12 3,540$ -$ $0 $35 3,575$

2.3 External Utility Coordination and Conflict Checks 8 16 4,120$ -$ $0 $41 4,161$

2.4 Site Visits and Field Confirmations 8 8 2,560$ -$ $0 $26 2,586$

2.5 Topographic Survey 2 4 8 2,310$ 28,106$ 28,106$ $1,405 $23 31,844$

2.6 Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting 4 8 2,060$ 35,800$ 35,800$ $1,790 $21 39,671$

2.7 Subsurface Utility Locating and Potholing 4 4 12 3,340$ 37,230$ 37,230$ $1,862 $33 42,465$

2.8 Hydraulic Capacity Sewer Modeling 16 8 60 14,420$ -$ $0 $144 14,564$

2.9 Review of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV)2 4 1,030$ -$ $0 $10 1,040$

2.10 Basis of Design Memorandum (BODM)2 40 32 15,190$ -$ $0 $152 15,342$ Subtotal Hours =0 2 16 80 56 140
Subtotal ($) =$0 $590 $3,920 $18,000 $9,800 $20,300 $52,610 35,800$ 28,106$ 37,230$ 101,136$ $5,057 $526 $159,329 Task 3.0 30% Design

3.1 30% Horizontal Alignment Drawings 4 12 32 60 17,980$ -$ $0 $180 18,160$

3.2 30% Interim Meetings (3)8 4 2,500$ -$ $0 $25 2,525$

3.3 30% Review Meeting (1)4 2 1,250$ -$ $0 $13 1,263$

3.4 Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR)4 24 20 10,080$ -$ $0 $101 10,181$

3.5 PDR Review Meeting and Workshop 4 4 1,600$ -$ $0 $16 1,616$ Subtotal Hours =0 4 4 52 62 60
Subtotal ($) =$0 $1,180 $980 $11,700 $10,850 $8,700 $21,730 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334$ $33,744 Task 4.0 60% Design

4.1 60% Vertical Alignment Drawings 4 24 60 160 40,080$ -$ $0 $401 40,481$

4.2 60% Interim Meetings (3)8 4 2,500$ -$ $0 $25 2,525$

4.3 60% Review Meeting and Workshop 4 2 1,250$ -$ $0 $13 1,263$

4.4 Final Preliminary Design Report (PDR)4 24 20 10,080$ -$ $0 $101 10,181$ Subtotal Hours =0 4 4 60 86 160
Subtotal ($) =$0 $1,180 $980 $13,500 $15,050 $23,200 $53,910 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0 $539 $54,449 Task 5.0 90% Design

5.1 90% Design Drawings 4 16 48 112 29,220$ -$ $0 $292 29,512$

5.2 90% Specifications 20 24 8,700$ -$ $0 $87 8,787$

5.3 Construction Cost Estimate (EOPCC)8 8 32 7,840$ -$ $0 $78 7,918$

5.4 90% Review Meeting 4 2 1,250$ -$ $0 $13 1,263$ Subtotal Hours =0 0 4 48 82 144
Subtotal ($) =$0 $0 $980 $10,800 $14,350 $20,880 $47,010 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $470 $47,480 Task 6.0 Permitting and Environmental Support

6.1 External Agency Stakeholder Coordination 24 16 8,200$ -$ $0 $82 8,282$

6.2 Caltrans Encroachment Permit Support 24 24 60 18,300$ -$ $0 $183 18,483$

6.3 Engineering Support for Environmental Permit Applications (CEQA)8 8 3,200$ -$ $0 $32 3,232$ Subtotal Hours =0 0 0 56 48 60
Subtotal ($) =$0 $0 $0 $12,600 $8,400 $8,700 $29,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $297 $29,997 Design
Engineer
Partners
Total Mark-UpProject
Engineer
Harris &
Associates
Total
Ninyo & Moore
(Socotec)
CIP 8396 - SYCAMORE AVE AND HWY 78 SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS - Compensation and Fee Schedule Project
Manager
Senior
Engineer
Principal-in-
ChargeScope of Work's Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Fee Subtotals (Aggregate)
T2 Utility
Engineers
O'Day
Consultants
ODCs
Expenses
QA/QC
Manager
3/26/202606/09/2026 C5 416 of 422

Task 7.0 Final Design

7.1 Draft Final Submittal 4 4 16 20 7,580$ -$ $0 $76 7,656$

7.2 Draft Final Review Meeting 4 2 1,250$ -$ $0 $13 1,263$

7.3 Final Submittal 4 4 8 8 4,440$ -$ $0 $44 4,484$ Subtotal Hours =0 0 8 12 26 28
Subtotal ($) =$0 $0 $1,960 $2,700 $4,550 $4,060 $13,270 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $133 $13,403 Task 8.0 Bid Support

8.1 Pre-Bid Meeting 4 4 1,600$ -$ $0 $16 1,616$

8.2 Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) (4)2 8 12 4,130$ -$ $0 $41 4,171$

8.3 Preparation of Addenda (2)4 16 3,220$ -$ $0 $32 3,252$

8.4 Preparation of Conformed Set (1)2 8 1,610$ -$ $0 $16 1,626$ Subtotal Hours =0 2 0 18 4 36
Subtotal ($) =$0 $590 $0 $4,050 $700 $5,220 $10,560 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0 $106 $10,666 Task 9.0 Construction Administration

9.1 General Project Management During Construction 4 36 9,360$ -$ $0 $94 9,454$

9.2 Pre-Construction Meeting (1)4 4 1,600$ -$ $0 $16 1,616$

9.3 Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) (6)2 8 24 5,870$ -$ $0 $59 5,929$

9.4 Submittal Review (10)8 32 6,440$ -$ $0 $64 6,504$

9.5 Progress Meetings (4)8 8 3,200$ -$ $0 $32 3,232$

9.6 Change Order Assistance (2)2 8 8 3,550$ -$ $0 $36 3,586$

9.7 Record Drawings 4 32 5,540$ -$ $0 $55 5,595$ Subtotal Hours =4 4 0 76 12 96
Subtotal ($) =$1,260 $1,180 $0 $17,100 $2,100 $13,920 $35,560 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0 $356 $35,916 Total Hours by Classification =16 56 36 478 380 748 1,714 Total ($) by Classification =5,040$ 16,520$ 8,820$ 107,550$ 85,500$ 168,300$ $301,210 $35,800 $28,106 $37,230 $101,136 $5,057 $3,129 $422,212 Percentage of Time Allocated (by hours) =0.93%3.27%2.10%27.89%22.17%43.64%100.00%8.48%6.66%8.82%23.95%0.74% $422,212Total Fee:
3/26/202606/09/2026 C5 417 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit C, Page 1 of 3

EXHIBIT C

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering Code 1 (any auto), with limits no less than $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

Contractor shall also provide the additional coverages checked below and at least as broad as:

4. Professional Liability, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate.

If the Contractor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, District requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to District.

Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by District. At the option of District, either: the Contractor shall cause the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects District, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to District guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.

Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The District, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of with respect 06/09/2026 C5 418 of 422

2. For any claims related to this Project, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects District, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.

Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by District, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to District.

Claims Made Policies
If any coverage required is written on a claims-made coverage form:

1. The retroactive date must be shown, and this date must be before the execution date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of contract work.

4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to District for review.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to District.

Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby agrees to waive rights of subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of District for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors.

Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish District with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable insurance language, effecting coverage required by this contract. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by District before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall 06/09/2026 C5 419 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit C, Page 3 of 3
not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. District reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, required by these specifications, at any time.

Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that District is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage, subcontractors shall provide coverage with a format least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.

Special Risks or Circumstances
District reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other circumstances.

06/09/2026 C5 420 of 422

00034875 3 Exhibit D

4. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the Agency, forfeit not more than fifty dollars ($50) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any p ublic work done under the contract by Contractor or by any subcontractor.

7. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the Agency, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the pro visions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the California Labor Code.

00034875 3 Exhibit E

EXHIBIT E

SPECIAL PROVISIONS
This Contract is subject to the following provisions, if checked:

1. State of California grant conditions, as attached.

2. Federal grant conditions, as attached.

3. Other conditions, as attached.

06/09/2026 C5 422 of 422

Vista City CouncilJune 9, 2026

Vista City Council
June 9, 2026