Agenda — Wasco City Council, June 21, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

Appendix B

Acronym Definition
Level 1 Charging Charging via AC electrical connection at 120 volts and up to 16 amps, or 1.9 kW.

Level 2 Charging Charging via AC electrical connection at 208 volts or 240 volts at up to 80 amps.

DC Fast Charging Charging via DC electrical connection using off-board AC/DC equipment at a fast rate. Not all EVs have
this connector.

CHAdeMO and/or CCS Charging Connector
Standards
Three are three types of standard charging
connectors for Direct Current Fast Charging.

Vehicles capable of DC fast charging will have one
of these ports on the vehicle. Other nonstandard
connectors include Tesla and BYD. Most public
DCFC currently deployed in California includes
standard CHAdeMO and/or CCS Type 1 charging
connectors.

IOU(s) Investor Owned Utility(ies)
EVITP Training The Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program provides electricians with training for the installation of EVSE. EVITP is a collaboration of industry
stakeholders, including automakers, EVSE
manufacturers, educational institutions, utility
companies, and electric industry professionals.

More information is available at https://evitp.org.

NRTL Nationally Recognized Testing Lab

Pre-construction: These EV charging equipment safety requirements must be specified in procurement documents:

1. Charging equipment must be certified by a Nationally Recognized Testing Lab (NRTL).

2. Infrastructure must comply with applicable safety performance requirements associated with the type of TE infrastructure being installed.
• For light-duty vehicles, compliance with the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J - 1772 Standard for Level 1 or Level 2 charging. Compliance with CHAdeMO and CCS for DC fast charging would be appropriate evidence of compliance with this requirement. • For other types of TE infrastructure, including any nonstandardized EVSE, the following basic connector safety measures will be required:
• A passing EVSE safety performance evaluation report performed by a Nationally Recognized Testing Lab (NRTL);
• When not connected, the vehicle inlet and the EVSE connector must be designed to prevent direct contact with any live components;
• The vehicle inlet and EVSE connector shall be free of sharp edges an d potentially injurious protrusions;
• The coupler between the vehicle and the EVSE should avoid or mitigate any potentially hazardous conditions such as fires, electrical shock to users, or other personal injuries. 187 of 252
Transportation Electrification Safety Requirements Checklist D.18-01-024/D.18-05-040

Page 4 of 4 ends

Appendix B

3. Infrastructure and its planned installation must comply with California Electrical Code Article 625.1

4. Infrastructure and its planned installation must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and California Building Code Chapter 11B, 2 if applicable, per the AHJ where the EVSE will be installed, unless the appropriate waiver is obtained from local authorities.

5. Outdoor-mounted EVSE must be rated to be installed for outdoor use.

6. For utility infrastructure work on the customer side of the meter, contractors must provide proof of EVITP Certification prior to construction.

7. Contractors must provide the utility proof of a full site assessment, including the appropriate load calculations to ensure existing infrastructure can accommodate add itional EV load, or that appropriate infrastructure upgrades will be completed.

During Construction:

1. All utility infrastructure work on the customer side of the meter not performed by employees of the IOUs shall be performed by fully licensed electricians. For commercial installations, all electrical contractors should hold a valid C-10 contractor’s license.

2. Installations will be designed per Article 625 of the California Electrical Code.

Operational Safety:

1. Overcurrent protection associated with utility transformers and distribution circuits that feed power to the charging stations.

2. Overcurrent protection in the me ter pedestal/circuit breaker panel that feeds each of the charging stations.

3. Bollard equipment protection installed where appropriate as defined by utility design standards and AHJ requirements.

4. Concrete parking stops to protect equipment where appropriate as defined by utility design standards and AHJ requirements.

2 California Electrical Code Article 625 covers Electric Vehicle Charging System safety and standards as installed in place. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Article 625. 3 California Building Code Chapter 2 includes definition associated with electric vehicle charging stations. CBC Chapter 11B defines requirements for ‘Accessibility to Public Buildings, Public Accommodations, Commercial Buildings, and Public Housing.’

188 of 252
U
9'-0"
(TYP)
18'-0"(TYP)
9'-0"
(TYP)
SCOPE OF WORK:

PROJECT SCOPE INCLUDES (4) STANDARD EV FLEET
STALLS. THE STALLS ARE LOCATED IN THE SOUTH SIDE OF
YARD. THE EV STALLS WILL BE SERVICED BY PEDESTAL
MOUNT EVSE. SEE DETAILED SITE LAYOUT FOR MORE
INFORMATION.

PROJECT SUMMARY
DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

SCALE AS NOTED
SHEET NO.

OF SHEETS

CONSULTANT
CITY OF WASCO 747 G STREET, WASCO, CA 93280
SCALE: 1" = 20'

ALBERT CARDIEL

CASSIE BURGER
05-05-2022
1 1
PRELIMINARY DESIGN - FLEET003830908

G STREET
8TH STREET

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING BUILDING

EXISTING UTILITY

EXISTING

LIGHT POLE

EXISTING

TRANSFORMER
T300249 750KVA
12/21KV-480/277V
PROPOSED 600A

METER SERVICE

PROPOSED PEDESTAL
MOUNT 45KVA STEP

DOWN TRANSFORMER

PROPOSED PEDESTAL MOUNT
200A DISTRIBUTION PANEL
2-750AL QPX
IN 2-5" DUCT

EXISTING ROLL GATE
PROPOSED SYMBOL LEGEND:

BTM BOLLARD

BTM WHEELSTOP
LEVEL 2 ELECTRIC VEHICLE

SINGLE PORT PEDESTAL

CHARGER
LEVEL 3 ELECTRIC VEHICLE

SINGLE PORT PEDESTAL

CHARGER

DISTRIBUTION PANEL

METER SERVICE

STEP DOWN TRANSFORMER

TTM UNDERGROUND CONDUIT
LINE

BTM UNDERGROUND CONDUIT
LINE

LIMITS OF WORK

CONCRETE

STALL AND STATION COUNT

PROPOSED EV CHARGING QUANTITY
FLEET STALLS 4
TOTAL 4

EV CHARGING STATIONS QUANTITY
LEVEL 2 (19 KW NOMINAL/ 19 KW ACTUAL) SINGLE
PORT - PEDESTAL MOUNT 2
DCFC (150 KW NOMINAL/ 150 KW ACTUAL) SINGLE
PORT - PEDESTAL MOUNT 2
TOTAL 4

ANTICIPATED LOAD TOTAL KW
TBD @ 19KW 38
TBD @ 150KW 300
CHARGER BANK DEMAND LOAD (AMPS 480V) 406.6

BILL OF MATERIALS

ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
BTM 600A, 480/277V, 3Ø, METER SERVICE -
PEDESTAL MOUNT EACH 1
BTM 200A, 208/120V, 3Ø, DISTRIBUTION -
PEDESTAL MOUNT EACH 1
BTM 45KVA, 480-208/120V, 3Ø, STEP DOWN
TRANSFORMER - PEDESTAL MOUNT EACH 1
BTM 1" PVC CONDUIT LF 20
BTM 2" PVC CONDUIT LF 135
BTM 3" PVC CONDUIT LF 130
TTM 5" PVC CONDUIT LF 80
BTM (3) #4 AWG THWN-2 CU + (1) #8 AWG THWN-2
CU EGC LF 15
BTM (2) #1 AWG THWN-2 CU + (1) #6 AWG THWN-2
CU EGC LF 150
BTM (4) 2/0 AWG THWN-2 CU + (1) #4 AWG THWN-2
CU EGC LF 25
BTM (3) 250 MCM THWN-2 CU + (1) #4 AWG THWN-2
CU EGC LF 155
TTM 750AL QPX LF 110
TTM 36" WIDE OPEN CUT TRENCH - HARDSCAPE LF 40
BTM 24" WIDE OPEN CUT TRENCH - HARDSCAPE LF 95
TTM RESTORE ASPHALT PAVEMENT SF 120
BTM RESTORE ASPHALT PAVEMENT SF 190
BTM CONCRETE WHEEL STOP EACH 4
BTM BOLLARD EACH 6
BTM EV CHARGER FOUNDATION EACH 4
NOTE:

1. ALL QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

2. ASSUMED STANDARD RATED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED.

LIMITS OF WORK
189 of 252
.

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: M. Scott Hurlbert, City Manager
Maria Lara, Assistant City Manger
Tom Schroeter, City Attorney

DATE: June 21, 2022

SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Wasco Updating and Establishing User and Regulatory Fees.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution updating and establishing user and regulatory fees, with updated fees to be effective July 1, 2022.

Background:

On August 17, 2021, the City Council adopted an updated Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees based on the results of a comprehensive cost of service study. During interim years (i.e., during years in between comprehensive studies) the City Council has authorized inflationary adjustments to fees.

This year represents an interim year update, with updates primarily intended to apply the authorized inflationary adjustments and to incorporate feedback received subsequent to adoption of the City’s current schedule of fees.

User and regulatory fees are established by the City Council. The City’s fee schedule is a compilation of fees for City services provided to members of the public. The advantages of updating the City’s user and regulatory fees include assuring that fees are set based on current costs and approved cost recovery objectives while providing transparency in the fee structure for the City’s development-related and other municipal fees.

The fee schedule identifies fees for services and activities provided at the request of, or on behalf of, a single party as opposed to the public at large. Examples of user and regulatory fees collected by the City of Wasco and municipalities throughout California include, but are not limited to:
• Planning Fees, such as entitlement review and review for compliance with the zoning code
• Building Fees, such as permitting of new construction or modifications to existing structures

STAFF REPORT
City of Wasco

190 of 252
• Engineering Fees, such as map review, encroachment permitting, and public improvement review
• Animal Services Fees, such as animal adoption, and animal impound fees

User and regulatory fees specifically exclude:
• Taxes
• Assessments
• Franchise Fees
• Development Impact Fees
• Fines or Penalties
• Utility Rates and Services Charges

Industry best practice and California statute are in harmony: User and regulatory fees should be set according to the estimated reasonable cost of service and should bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the activities and/or services provided by the City. Recovering the costs of providing fee- related services directly influences the City’s goal of maintaining fiscal stability while continuing to provide quality essential services.

Additionally, ongoing review and adjustment of fees provides multiple benefits, including:
• Increasing the availability of General Fund revenues to be used for services and activities available to all Wasco residents and businesses, such as public safety services.
• Keeping pace with general cost inflation.
• Avoiding fee spikes that are more likely to occur when municipalities leave fees unchanged for a multiyear period.
• Providing fee payers, city staff, and city policymakers with a pattern of consistency that provides information for forecasting and decision-making purposes. • Helps meet fee- payer service level expectations by collecting fees to fund the existing level of services provided.
• Encouraging generation al equity among fee payers by avoiding long -term stagnation of fees followed by significant fee increases.

The fee schedule is intended to be reviewed annually by City staff as part of the normal course of operations. Typically, a cost of service study i s anticipated to be completed every three to five years with incremental updates occurring in the years in between comprehensive studies. This update represents an interim year update with minor, incremental, changes proposed that incorporate feedback rec eived during prior fee studies and feedback received subsequent to adoption of the City’s current schedule of fees.

Discussion:

During interim years (i.e., during years in between comprehensive fee studies) the City Council has authorized inflationary adjustments to fees. The inflationary adjustments are based on the annual percentage change in the all -urban Consumer Price Index for Consumer Price Index All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA (CPI).

For FY 2022/23, the annual percentage change in CPI was 3.83%.

The following provides a brief overview of this update:
• No new fees are proposed as part of this update
• A total of 158 fees are proposed to increase by 3.8%
191 of 252
• A total of 77 fees are proposed to remain unchanged

Fiscal Impact:

The intent of these adjustments is to reflect the gradual increase of costs due to inflationary pressures. Recalibration of these fees simply provides an offset of existing expenditures/needs rather than a source of funding for expanded service levels, thus there is no net incremental revenue expected.

Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Illustration of Proposed Fee Changes

3. Consumer Price Index for Consumer Price Index All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles- Long Beach-Anaheim, CA (CPI)

192 of 252
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WASCO UPDATING AND

ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES

Whereas, user and regulatory fees are established by the City Council; and

Whereas, on August 17, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 - 3661, Updating and Establishing User and Regulatory Fees; and

Whereas, the City intends to periodically update fees based on findings of the User and Regulatory Fee Study prepared in 202 1, and feedback received subsequent to completion of the study; and

Whereas, the City Council hereby finds that the User and Regulatory Fee Study prepared in 2021 and supporting documentation provides adequate evidence to conclude that the revised fees do not exceed the cost to provide the ser vices for which the fees are charged; and

Whereas, the City Council desires that annually the City Manager may update the fees based on the annual percentage change in the all-urban Consumer Price Index for Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA (CPI). If the CPI does not change or goes down in a given year, no change shall be made to the fee schedule that year; and

Whereas, in adopting this Resolution, the City Council is taking action only on those fees for the services, programs or products set forth in Exhibit “A” which have been modified from prior resolutions of the City Council. The remaining fees that have not been modified from prior resolutions shall remain in full force and effect.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of W asco as follows:

SECTION 1: That the foregoing recitals and findings are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby adopts the fees, charges, and rates as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference. 193 of 252
SECTION 3: That any new or adjusted fees adopted by this Resolution shall go into effect July 1, 2022.

-o0o-

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 202 2 - _____ was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Wasco at a regular meeting thereof held on June 21, 2022 by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

__________________________

GILBERTO REYNA,
MAYOR of the City of Wasco

Attest: _______________

__________________________________
MARIA O. MARTINEZ
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Wasco
194 of 252
Illustration of Proposed Fee Changes
195 of 252

FEE SCHEDULE PAGE
Building Fees 3
Grading Fees 13
Planning Fees 15
Engineering and Encroachment Permit Fees 21
Construction Water Meter Rental Fees 25
Animal Regulation Fees 26
and punitive fines and penalties.

Table of Contents
Note: This Fee Schedule does not include all fees, rates, or charges that may be imposed by the City.

Examples of excluded items include, but are not limited to,development impact fees, utility rates, 196 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Charge Basis Note CPI
1 HVAC Change-Out - Residential $152 $158 per permit Yes 2 HVAC Change-Out - Commercial (per unit) $203 $210 per permit Yes 3 Residential Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit
a) 15kW or less $270 $280 per permit Yes
b) Above 15kW – base $270 $280 per permit Yes
c) Above 15kW – per kW $15 $15 per permit No
4 Commercial Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit
a) 50kW or less $1,000 $1,000 per permit No
b) 50kW – 250kW – Base $1,000 $1,000 per permit No
c) 50kW – 250kW – per kW above 50kW $7 $7 per permit No d) Above 250kW – base $2,400 $2,400 per permit No
e) Above 250kW – per kW $5 $5 per permit No
5 Service Panel Upgrade - Residential $152 $158 per permit Yes 6 Service Panel Upgrade - Commercial $203 $210 per permit Yes 7 Water Heater Change-Out $152 $158 per permit Yes
8 Line Repair - Sewer / Water / Gas $152 $158 per permit Yes 9 Re-pipe $270 $280 per permit Yes
10 Residential Re-Roof
a) Up to 2,000 SF $203 $210 per permit Yes
b) Each Add'l 1,000 SF or fraction thereof $68 $70 per permit Yes 11 Demolition $135 $140 per permit Yes
12 Temporary Power Pole $152 $158 per permit Yes
A. Fees for Commonly Requested Building Permit Types. Fees shown in this section (Section A.) include all applicable permit issuance, inspection, and plan review fees). Additional fees may apply for services provided by other City Departments (e.g. Planning Review), Technology Enhancement Fees, and Fees Collected on Behalf of Other Agencies (e.g. State of California).

Activity Description
3 197 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Charge Basis Note CPI
A. Fees for Commonly Requested Building Permit Types. Fees shown in this section (Section A.) include all applicable permit issuance, inspection, and plan review fees). Additional fees may apply for services provided by other City Departments (e.g. Planning Review), Technology Enhancement Fees, and Fees Collected on Behalf of Other Agencies (e.g. State of California).

Activity Description
13 Swimming Pool/Spa
a) Swimming Pool / Spa $304 $315 per permit Yes
b) Equipment Change-out Alone $169 $175 per permit Yes
14 Patio - Standard (Wood/Metal Frame) $230 $239 per permit Yes 15 Window / Sliding Glass Door
a) Retrofit / Repair / Replace $203 $210 per permit Yes b) New / Alteration $203 $210 per permit Yes
4 198 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Total Valuation Current Fee CPI
$1 to $4,000 $135.00 Yes
$4,001 to $10,000 $135.00 for the first $4,000 plus $33.76 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000
Yes
$10,001 to $50,000 $337.50 for the first $10,000 plus $11.81 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000
Yes
$50,001 to $100,000 $810.00 for the first $50,000 plus $10.80 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000
Yes
$100,001 to $500,000 $1,350.00 for the first $100,000 plus $6.08 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000
Yes
$500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,780.00 for the first $500,000 plus $3.24 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000
Yes
$1,000,001 and up $5,400.00 for the first $1,000,000 plus $2.59 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $1,000,000
Yes
For permits requiring plumbing, electric, or mechanical review, the following percentages shall be added to the base permit fee No
No
No
Plumbing inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
Electrical inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
- Building permit fees for factory built housing shall total 50% of the amount listed above - Determination of Valuation for Fee-Setting Purposes
● Project valuations shall be based on the total value of all construction work, including all finish work, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. If, in the opinion of the Building Official, the valuation is underestimated on the application, the permit shall be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates to meet the approval of the Building Official. Final building permit valuation shall be set by the Building Official. For determining project valuations for new construction, the Building Official may use data published by the International Code Council (ICC) (building valuation data table, typically updated in February and August of each year). The final building permit valuation shall be set at an amount that allows the City to recover its costs of applicant plan check, permit and inspection activities.

Note: For construction projects with permit fees calculated using Section B, C, D, or E, additional fees apply for permit issuance. Additional fees may apply for services provided by other City Departments (e.g. Planning Review), Technology Enhancement Fees, and Fees Collected on Behalf of Other Agencies (e.g. State of California). Additional fees apply for plan review, when applicable.

B. Permit Fee for New Buildings, Additions, Tenant Improvements, Residential Remodels, and Combined Mechanical, Electrical, and/or Plumbing Permits
Mechanical inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
5 199 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Total Valuation Current Fee CPI
Up to $2,000 $135.00 Yes
$2,001 to $4,000 $202.50 Yes
$4,001 to $10,000 $270.00 for the first $1,000 plus $11.25 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
Yes
$10,000 and up $337.50 for the first $10,000 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
Yes
Total Valuation Current Fee CPI
Up to $2,000 $135.00 Yes
$2,001 to $4,000 $202.50 Yes
$4,001 to $10,000 $270.00 for the first $1,000 plus $11.25 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
Yes
$10,000 and up $337.50 for the first $10,000 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
Yes
Total Valuation Current Fee CPI
Up to $2,000 $135.00 Yes
$2,001 to $4,000 $202.50 Yes
$4,001 to $10,000 $270.00 for the first $1,000 plus $11.25 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
Yes
$10,000 and up $337.50 for the first $10,000 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
Yes
C. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Mechanical Permit
D. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Plumbing Permit
E. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Electrical Permit
6 200 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Total Valuation Proposed Permit Fee CPI
$1 to $4,000 $140.00 Yes
$4,001 to $10,000 $140.00 for the first $4,000 plus $35.00 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000
Yes
$10,001 to $50,000 $350.00 for the first $10,000 plus $12.28 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000
Yes
$50,001 to $100,000 $841.00 for the first $50,000 plus $11.22 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000
Yes
$100,001 to $500,000 $1,402.00 for the first $100,000 plus $6.31 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000
Yes
$500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,925.00 for the first $500,000 plus $3.36 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000
Yes
$1,000,001 and up $5,607.00 for the first $1,000,000 plus $2.69 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $1,000,000
Yes
For permits requiring plumbing, electric, or mechanical review, the following percentages shall be added to the base permit fee No
No
No
Electrical inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
Determination of Valuation for Fee-Setting Purposes
● Project valuations shall be based on the total value of all construction work, including all finish work, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. If, in the opinion of the Building Official, the valuation is underestimated on the application, the permit shall be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates to meet the approval of the Building Official. Final building permit valuation shall be set by the Building Official. For determining project valuations for new construction, the Building Official may use data published by the International Code Council (ICC) (building valuation data table, typically updated in February and August of each year). The final building permit valuation shall be set at an amount that allows the City to recover its costs of applicant plan check, permit and inspection activities.

B. Permit Fee for New Buildings, Additions, Tenant Improvements, Residential Remodels, and Combined Mechanical, Electrical, and/or Plumbing Permits
Plumbing inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
Mechanical inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
- Building permit fees for factory built housing shall total 50% of the amount listed above - 7 201 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Total Valuation Proposed Permit Fee CPI
Up to $2,000 $140.00 Yes
$2,001 to $4,000 $210.00 Yes
$4,001 to $10,000 $280.00 for the first $1,000 plus $11.67 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
Yes
$10,000 and up $350.00 for the first $10,000 plus $4.67 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
Yes
Total Valuation Proposed Permit Fee CPI
Up to $2,000 $140.00 Yes
$2,001 to $4,000 $210.00 Yes
$4,001 to $10,000 $280.00 for the first $1,000 plus $11.67 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
Yes
$10,000 and up $350.00 for the first $10,000 plus $4.67 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
Yes
Total Valuation Proposed Permit Fee CPI
Up to $2,000 $140.00 Yes
$2,001 to $4,000 $210.00 Yes
$4,001 to $10,000 $280.00 for the first $1,000 plus $11.67 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
Yes
$10,000 and up $350.00 for the first $10,000 plus $4.67 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
Yes
C. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Mechanical Permit
D. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Plumbing Permit
E. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Electrical Permit
8 202 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Charge Basis Note CPI
1 Stand-Alone or Combination Permit Fees (Alternative Calculation) a) One Inspection Required $68 $70 Yes
b) Two Inspections Required $135 $140 Yes
c) Three Inspections Required $203 $210 Yes
d) Four Inspections Required $270 $280 Yes
e) Each Additional Inspection $68 $70 Yes
Activity Description
Note: For construction projects with permit fees calculated using Section F, additional fees apply for permit issuance. Additional fees may apply for services provided by other City Departments (e.g. Planning Review), Technology Enhancement Fees, and Fees Collected on Behalf of Other Agencies (e.g. State of California). Additional fees apply for plan review, when applicable.

F. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone or Combination Permits Not Identified Elsewhere in this Schedule 9 203 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Charge Basis Note CPI
1 Plan Check Fees
a) Plan Review Fee, if applicable (% of bldg permit fee) 65% 65% % of building permit fee
[a] No
b) Expedited Plan Check (when applicable) As billed by 3rd party plan check consultant, plus 25% administrative
fee
As billed by 3rd party plan check
consultant, plus 25% administrative
fee
No
G. Building Plan Review Fees
Activity Description
When applicable, plan check fees shall be paid at the time of application for a building permit.

The plan checking fee is in addition to the building permit fee [a] The City will bill for any 3rd party plan check costs that go beyond these fees, as charged by the plan check company plus a 25% administrative fee. 10 204 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Note CPI
1 Permit Processing Fee $68 $70 Yes
2 General Plan Maintenance Fee (percent of permit fee) 7% 7% [a] No 3 Technology Fee (percent of permit fee) 5% 5% No
4 Strong Motion Instrumentation (SMI) Fee Calculation
a) Residential $0.50 or valuation x .00013 $0.50 or valuation x .00013 No b) Commercial $0.50 or valuation x .00028 $0.50 or valuation x .00028 No 5 Building Standards (SB 1473) Fee Calculation (Valuation) - Green Fee a) $1 - $25,000 $1 $1 No
b) $25,001 - $50,000 $2 $2 No
c) $50,001 - $75,000 $3 $3 No
d) $75,001 - $100,000 $4 $4 No
e) Each Add'l $25,000 or fraction thereof Add $1 Add $1 No 6 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (per 30 Days) $101 $105 Yes 7 Damaged Building Survey (Fire, Flood, Vehicle Damage, Etc.) $203 $210 Yes Change Of Contractor / Permit Change
8 Change Of Contractor / Miscellaneous Permit Changes Initiated by Permittee $68 $70 Yes Violation Fees
9 Permit Fee / Investigation Fee For Work Done Without Permits 2x Permit Fee 2x Permit Fee No Other Fees
10 Phased Inspection Fee (per inspection) $68 $70 Yes
11 After Hours Inspection (per hour) (2-hour minimum) $162 $168 Yes 12 Re-inspection Fee (3rd Time or More) (each) $68 $70 [b] Yes 13 Missed inspection Fee $68 $70 Yes
H. Other Fees
Activity Description
11 205 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - BUILDING FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Note CPI
H. Other Fees
Activity Description
14 Credit Card Transaction Fee 3% - Pass-thru 3% - Pass-thru [c] No 15 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule (per 1/2 hour) $68 $70 Yes [a] Fee only applies to permits for new construction and commercial/industrial additions, and habitable residential additions. [b] Reinspection fee applies after second re-inspection. [c] For credit card payments in excess of $2,000.
12 206 of 252
City of Wasco
BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - GRADING FEES - PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ONLY * Current Initial Deposit /
Minimum Fee
Proposed Initial Deposit /
Minimum Fee Unit Note CPI

PLAN REVIEW FEES
1 Grading Plan Check
a) Single Dwelling Unit Less than .5 acre, less than 50 CY (Cut & Fill) $612 $635 deposit [a] Yes b) Parcels under 1 acre over 50 CY $1,224 $1,271 deposit [a] Yes c) 1.00 - 5.00 acres
i) First acre $1,224 $1,271 deposit [a] Yes
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof $306 $318 deposit [a] Yes d) 5.01 - 10.00 acres
i) First 5.01 acres $2,448 $2,542 deposit [a] Yes
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof $490 $508 deposit [a] Yes e) 10.01 - 100.00 acres
i) First 10.01 acres $4,896 $5,084 deposit [a] Yes
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof $218 $226 deposit [a] Yes f) Over 100.01 acres
i) First 100.01 acres $24,480 $25,418 deposit [a] Yes
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof $50 $50 deposit [a] 2 Permit Issuance - Onsite Construction / Grading $77 $79 fee Yes 3 Technology Fee (% of Fees Paid) 5% 5% % of fees paid, including T&M
billings
No
4 Extension of Time $77 $79 fee Yes
5 Fee for Additional Services Required Due to Changes, Modifications, Additions, etc.

Actual Costs / T&M plus
25% admin fee
Actual Costs / T&M plus
25% admin fee
deposit No
6 Permit Fee / Investigation Fee Work Commenced without a Permit 2x permit fee 2x permit fee fee No 7 Fees for Services Not Listed In this Fee Schedule
a) Hourly Rate of In-House Staff $153 $159 per hr Yes
b) Contract Service Providers Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 25% admin fee
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee
No
Activity Description
13 207 of 252
City of Wasco
BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - GRADING FEES - PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ONLY * Current Initial Deposit /
Minimum Fee
Proposed Initial Deposit /
Minimum Fee Unit Note CPIActivity Description
[a] Amount shown is initial deposit. All fees will be charged on a time & materials basis, plus 25% administrative fee.

Initial deposits will be collected and held by the City in a deposit account at the time the application is submitted. Project billing amounts will be drawn from the deposit account. A positive account balance shall be maintained at all times during the review process. No work will be performed on a project with a negative fund balance. If the deposit is reduced to below 20% of the initial deposit amount, the applicant will be notified and required to supplement the deposit account with an additional amount no less than 50% of the original deposit.

Funds expended for staff time shall not be dependent upon the City’s approval or disapproval of the application request. Any deposit amounts remaining after final project close out will be returned to applicant (less bond amounts held by the City).

As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant. * See Public Works / Engineering Fees for Tract, Street, and Other Grading Fees Full Cost Deposits and Deposit Replenishment
Applicants for full cost (deposit-based) submittals shall pay for all City staff and contract service provider time and materials required to process the application. A full cost reimbursement agreement shall be included with the project application submittal package. Projects outside the scope of this fee schedule will be subject to a full cost reimbursement agreement to be approved by the City Manager and/or City Council. This reimbursement agreement will include the identification of a work program and will include cost estimates for both City staff time and consultant services based on a defined scope of work.

Full Cost Deposits and Deposit Replenishment
14 208 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Note CPI 1 Annexations
a) Annexation $10,000 $10,000 Yes
b) Out of Area Service Reviews $2,512 $2,608 Yes
2 Williamson Act Contracts
a) Notice of Non-Renewal $1,200 $1,200 Yes
b) Contract Cancellation $1,500 $1,500 Yes
c) Establishment of Agricultural Preserve $3,000 $3,000 Yes 3 Temporary Uses
a) Temporary Use Permit - Major $314 $326 [a] Yes
b) Temporary Use Permit - Minor $79 $82 [a] Yes
c) Home Occupation $79 $82 Yes
d) Sidewalk Vending Permit $157 $163 Yes
4 Sign Review
a) Individual Sign $157 $163 Yes
b) Master Sign Program $314 $326 Yes
c) Temporary Sign Permit $79 $82 Yes
Activity Description
Current Proposed
15 209 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Note CPIActivity Description Current Proposed
5 Site Plan Review
a) Single Family Porches and Patios and Non-Habitable Accessory Structures over 120 sq ft.
$79 $82 Yes
b) Single Family (New and Modifications) $157 $163 Yes
c) Accessory Dwelling Unit $157 $163 Yes
d) New and Modification to Existing Multi-Family (Fewer than 4 Units)
$471 $489 Yes
e) Comm. / Indust. / Multi-Family (4 Units or More)
i) Less than 1 Acre $3,140 $3,260 Yes
ii) 1 - 5 Acres $4,710 $4,891 Yes
iii) More than 5 Acres $6,280 $6,521 Yes
f) Comm. / Indust. / Multi-Family (4 Units or More) - Modification to Existing Sites
i) Minor - Less than 5,000 Square Feet $1,570 $1,630 Yes ii) Major - 5,000 Square Feet or More $2,512 $2,608 Yes g) Landscape Plan Review (Commercial / Industrial / Multi-Family Residential and Master Tract)
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
with $500 initial deposit
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
with $500 initial deposit
No
h) Landscape Plan Review (Single Family Residential) $157 $163 Yes 6 Conditional Use Permit
a) Conditional Use Permit - Class I $1,884 $1,956 [b] Yes b) Conditional Use Permit - Class II $3,140 $3,260 [c] Yes c) Conditional Use Permit - Class III $6,280 $6,521 [d] Yes d) Conditional Use Permit - Modifications $1,570 $1,630 [e] Yes 7 Variance $1,570 $1,630 Yes
16 210 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Note CPIActivity Description Current Proposed
8 Precise Development
a) New $7,850 $8,151 Yes
b) Major Modification $6,280 $6,521 Yes
c) Minor Modification $1,570 $1,630 Yes
9 Specific Plan $15,000 $15,000 Yes
10 Zoning Ordinance Amendments
a) Zoning Ordinace Text Amendment $3,140 $3,260 Yes
b) Zoning Change $4,000 $4,000 Yes
c) General Plan Amendment $4,000 $4,000 Yes
11 Land Division
a) Certificate of Compliance $942 $942 Yes
b) Lot Line Adjustment/Parcel Merger $1,570 $1,570 Yes
c) Tentative Parcel Map $4,082 $4,082 Yes
d) Modifications or Revisions to Tentative Parcel Map $1,570 $1,570 Yes e) Parcel Map Waiver $1,256 $1,256 Yes
f) Tentative Map - up to 100 lots $4,710 $4,710 Yes
g) Tentative Map - over 100 lots
i) Base Fee for First 100 Lots $4,710 $4,710 Yes
ii) Per Lot over 100 deposit $26 $26 Yes
h) Modifications or Revisions to Tentative Tract Map $2,512 $2,512 Yes i) Reversion to Acreage $4,000 $4,000 Yes
17 211 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Note CPIActivity Description Current Proposed
12 Miscellaneous
a) Pre-Application Review 1/4 of application cost 1/4 of application cost [f] No b) Appeals $1,000 $1,000 No
c) Development Agreement $6,280 $6,280 Yes
d) Right-of-Way Vacation $4,000 $4,000 Yes
e) Time Extension
i) Staff Level Approval $79 $82 Yes
ii) Planning Commission Approval $628 $652 Yes
f) Oil and Gas Drilling Permit $6,280 $6,280 Yes
ENVIROMENTAL REVIEW AND RELATED FEES [g]
13 CEQA [g]
a) Exemption $157 $163 [g] Yes
b) Initial Study/Negative Declaration or Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/ND or IS/MND)
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
[g] No
c) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
[g] No
d) Addendum to IS/ND or IS/MND Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
[g] No
e) Addendum to EIR Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
[g] No
18 212 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Note CPIActivity Description Current Proposed
14 NEPA [g]
a) Exclusion Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
[g] No
b) Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact (EA/FONSI)
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
[g] No
c) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
[g] No
15 All Other Environmental Review Services Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee;
Initial deposit based on
consultant estimate
[g] No
Other
16 Technology Fee (percent of fees paid) 5% % of fees paid including T&M billings
5% % of fees paid including T&M
billings
No
17 Fees for Services Not Listed In this Fee Schedule
a) Hourly Rate of In-House Staff $157 $163 Yes
b) Contract Service Providers Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 25% admin fee
Pass-through of Consultant
Costs plus 25% admin fee
No
[a] Temporary use permit fees may be waived with City Manager approval for local non-profit events or City sponsored events only. [b] All residential zones and commercial zones in existing buildings only. [c] Commercial Zones new construction.
[d] Industrial Zones.
[e] All zones.
[f] 50% credit to application.
[g] Plus, pass through of envirornmental document filing fees or other fees collected by other agencies (e.g. fees set by the State of California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the County of Kern).

Full Cost Deposits and Deposit Replenishment
19 213 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Flat Fee Minimum Fee / Initial Deposit Note CPIActivity Description Current Proposed
A. Refund of 100% shall be made if a determination is made that the permit and associated fee are not required by the City's Municipal Code or adopted City Resolution.

B. If an applicant requests to withdraw a fixed fee application prior to project evaluation, refund of 50% of the applicable fee shall be refunded.

C. No refund of application fees shall be made after initial project evaluation has commenced, unless a fee waiver is approved by the City Council.

Overview of Fee Structure
Fees may be either fixed fees, deposits, or deposits with a minimum fee amount due. When a fee is deposit-based, the City will collect the initial depots and bill against that deposit. The minimum total amount charged for deposit-based fees shall be the amount shown in the minimum fee column.

As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant.

Refund Policy
Application fees are not refundable except as follows:

Applicants for full cost (deposit-based) submittals shall pay for all City staff and contract service provider time and materials required to process the application. A full cost reimbursement agreement shall be included with the project application submittal package. Projects outside the scope of this fee schedule will be subject to a full cost reimbursement agreement to be approved by the City Manager and/or City Council. This reimbursement agreement will include the identification of a work program and will include cost estimates for both City staff time and consultant services based on a defined scope of work. 20 214 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING FEES # Activity Description Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Charge Basis Note CPI
1 Public Improvement - Plan Check & Inspection
a) Plan Review
i) Up to 20 Lots T&M, plus 25% admin fee 5% of improvement cost T&M, plus 25% admin fee 5% of improvement cost [a] No ii) More than 20 Lots T&M, plus 25% admin fee 3.5% of improvement cost T&M, plus 25% admin fee 3.5% of improvement cost [a] No iii) Other - Not Tract Related T&M, plus 25% admin fee 5% of improvement cost T&M, plus 25% admin fee 5% of improvement cost [a] No b) Inspection
i) Up to 20 Lots T&M, plus 25% admin fee 5% of improvement cost T&M, plus 25% admin fee 5% of improvement cost [a] No ii) More than 20 Lots T&M, plus 25% admin fee 3.5% of improvement cost T&M, plus 25% admin fee 3.5% of improvement cost [a] No iii) Other - Not Tract Related T&M, plus 25% admin fee 5% of improvement cost T&M, plus 25% admin fee 5% of improvement cost [a] No 2 Map Review
a) Tentative Map See Comm Dev Planning
Fees
See Comm Dev Planning
Fees
See Comm Dev Planning
Fees
See Comm Dev Planning
Fees
No
b) Final Map Including Subdivision Improvement
Agreement
i) Parcel Map T&M, plus 25% admin fee $3,000 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $3,000 No ii) Tract Map T&M, plus 25% admin fee $5,000 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $5,000 No Current Proposed
21 215 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING FEES # Activity Description Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Charge Basis Note CPI
Current Proposed
3 Encroachment Permit
a) Permit Processing / Application Intake Fee $77 $79 Yes b) Minor Encroachment
i) Plan Review, if required $77 $79 Yes
ii) Inspection, if required $153 $159 Yes
c) Major Encroachment
i) Plan Review, if required $306 $318 Yes
ii) Inspection, if required $612 $635 Yes
d) Expedited Requests (< 24 hours) 1.5x standard fee 1.5x standard fee No e) Projects lasting more than 3 days or
excavation of more than 100 LF or 400 SF / non-
standard projects
i) Plan Review, if required T&M, plus 25% admin fee $1,000 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $1,000 No ii) Inspection, if required T&M, plus 25% admin fee $200 x expected # of days T&M, plus 25% admin fee $200 x expected # of days No iii) City Staff Hourly Billing, if required (per
hour)
$153 $159 Yes
4 Oversize Load Permit
a) One Day $16 $16 [b] No
b) Annual $90 $90 [b] No
5 Survey / Monument T&M, plus 25% admin fee $1,500 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $1,500 No 6 Special District Formation T&M, plus 25% admin fee $7,500 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $7,500 No 7 Reimbursement Agreement T&M, plus 25% admin fee $2,500 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $2,500 No 8 Easement T&M, plus 25% admin fee $2,500 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $2,500 No 9 Certificate of Acceptance T&M, plus 25% admin fee $1,500 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $1,500 No 22 216 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING FEES # Activity Description Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Charge Basis Note CPI
Current Proposed
10 Special Study Review (when study review not
included as part of other fee or deposit)
T&M, plus 25% admin fee $1,000 T&M, plus 25% admin fee $1,000 No 11 Industrial Discharge Permit T&M, plus 25% admin fee T&M, plus 25% admin fee No 12 Self-Haul Permit Fee (Per Year) $350 $363 per year Yes 13 Technology (% of fees paid) 5% 5% % of fees paid,
including T&M
billings
No
14 Extension of Time $115 $119 one year Yes
15 Revisions
a) Reviewed/Inspected by Outside Service
Provider
i) Outside Service Provider Fee Time & Materials Time & Materials Time & Materials Time & Materials ii) City Staff Review 25% of vendor costs 25% of vendor costs 25% of vendor costs 25% of vendor costs b) Reviewed/Inspected by City Staff (per hour) $153 $159 per hour Yes 16 After Hours Inspections (per hour; 2 hr. minimum) $184 $191 per hour; 2-hr minimum
Yes
17 Re-Inspection (3rd time or more) and missed
inspection (each)
$153 $159 per hour Yes
[a] Based on City approved engineer's cost estimate, plus 20% contingency. [b] Fee set to match CA Department of Transportation.
23 217 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING FEES # Activity Description Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Charge Basis Note CPI
Current Proposed
Overview of Fee Structure
Fees may be either fixed fees, deposits, or deposits with a minimum fee amount due. When a fee is deposit-based, the City will collect the initial depots and bill against that deposit. The minimum total amount charged for deposit-based fees shall be the amount shown in the minimum fee column.

Full Cost Deposits and Deposit Replenishment
Applicants for full cost (deposit-based) submittals shall pay for all City staff and contract service provider time and materials required to process the application. A full cost reimbursement agreement shall be included with the project application submittal package. Projects outside the scope of this fee schedule will be subject to a full cost reimbursement agreement to be approved by the City Manager and/or City Council. This reimbursement agreement will include the identification of a work program and will include cost estimates for both City staff time and consultant services based on a defined scope of work.

As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant.

Refund Policy
Application fees are not refundable except as follows:

A. Refund of 100% shall be made if a determination is made that the permit and associated fee are not required by the City's Municipal Code or adopted City Resolution.

B. If an applicant requests to withdraw a fixed fee application prior to project evaluation, refund of 50% of the applicable fee shall be refunded.

C. No refund of application fees shall be made after initial project evaluation has commenced, unless a fee waiver is approved by the City Council. 24 218 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - CONSTRUCTION WATER METER RENTAL # Activity Description Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee
Refundable
Deposit
Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee
Refundable
Deposit Charge Basis Note CPI
1 Construction Water Meter $150; plus the cost of total water usage per month
$1,250 $150; plus the cost of total
water usage per month
$1,250 each [a] No
[a] Refundable deposit to be used if applicant damages or does not return meter and/or does not pay for their water usage during meter rental period.

Current Proposed
25 219 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - ANIMAL SERVICES FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Charge Basis Note CPI
Animal Adoption Fee
1 Animal Adoption Fee
a) Female Cat $84 $87 Yes
b) Male Cat $50 $52 Yes
c) Dog $85 $88 Yes
Dog Licenses
2 Natural dog over 4 months $30 $32 one year only Yes
3 Altered dog over 4 months $15 $16 one year only Yes
4 Natural dog over 1 year
a) One year $60 $62 Yes
b) Two years $110 $114 Yes
c) Three years $160 $166 Yes
5 Altered dog over 1 year
a) One year $15 $16 Yes
b) Two years $25 $26 Yes
c) Three years $40 $42 Yes
6 Lost License Tag Replacement $5 $5 [a] No
7 Unpaid Dog License $10 $10 [b] No
Activity Description
26 220 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - ANIMAL SERVICES FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Charge Basis Note CPIActivity Description Kennels with Facilities to House/Board
8 Over 20 Dogs and Permittees Keeping More Than 20 Dogs a) Flat Fee $175 $182 Yes
b) Additional Per Dog Fee $7.50 $8 Yes
9 Not More Than 20 Dogs and Permittees Keeping Not Less Than 11 Dogs, and Not More Than 20 Dogs
a) Flat Fee $125 $130 Yes
b) Additional Per Dog Fee $7.50 $8 Yes
10 Not More Than 10 Dogs And Permittees Keeping Not More Than 10 Dogs a) Flat Fee $75 $78 Yes
b) Additional Per Dog Fee $7.50 $7.79 Yes
Animal Impoundment Fees
11 Care and Feeding of Dog or Cat $15 $16 per animal per day Yes 12 Care and Feeding of Any Animal, Except Cats and Dogs, Weighing Less Than 100 Pounds
$15 $16 per animal per day Yes
13 Care and Feeding of Any Animal, Except Cats and Dogs, Weighing More Than 100 Pounds But Less Than 500 Pounds
$20 $21 per animal per day Yes
14 Care and Feeding of Any Animal Weighing 500 Pounds or Over $30 $31 per animal per day Yes Redemption of Impounded Animal Fees
15 Dog Redemption
a) First violation of Section 6.04.120 $40 $40 No
b) Second violation of Section 6.04.120 $100 $100 No
c) Third and subsequent violations of Section 6.04.120 in any 12-month period $200 $200 No 16 Dangerous Animal Redemption
a) First violation of Section 6.04.250 $150 $150 No
b) Second violation of Section 6.04.250 $250 $250 No
c) Third or more violations of Section 6.04.250 $500 $500 No 17 Unvaccinated Dogs (Additional Fee) $15 $15 No
27 221 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - ANIMAL SERVICES FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Charge Basis Note CPIActivity Description Disposition of Animals on Owner’s Request
18 Owner Delivery of Healthy Dog to Animal Shelter $40 $42 Yes 19 Owner Delivery of Sick/Injured Dog to Animal Shelter for Euthanasia $75 $78 Yes 20 Animal Control Pickup of Dog for Euthanasia $100 $104 Yes 21 After-Hours Animal Control Pickup of Dog $75 $78 Yes 22 After-Hours Animal Control Pickup of Dog for Euthanasia $125 $130 Yes 23 Owner Delivery of Cat to Animal Shelter $10 $10 Yes
24 Disposition of Dead Animals [c]
a) During Normal Business Hours $50 $52 Yes
b) After Normal Business Hours $75 $78 Yes
Exotic/Wild Animal Permit Fees
25 One or More Animals Each Weighing Less Than 25 Lbs $40 $42 yearly Yes 26 One or More Animals Each Weighing 25--50 Lbs $50 $52 yearly Yes 27 One or More Animals Each Weighing 50--100 Lbs $60 $62 yearly Yes 28 One or More Animals Each Weighing 100 Lbs or More $72 $75 yearly Yes Penalties [d]
29 First Offense $50 $50 No
30 Second Offense $100 $100 No
31 Third and Subsequent Offenses Criminal
Complaint May Be
Filed
Criminal
Complaint May Be
Filed
No
Citations for Failure to Spay or Neuter [e]
32 First Occurrence $35 $35 No
33 Second Occurrence $50 $50 No
34 Third and Subsequent Occurrences $100 $100 per occurrence No 28 222 of 252
City of Wasco

BEFORE AND AFER ILLUSTRATION - ANIMAL SERVICES FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Charge Basis Note CPIActivity Description [a]
[b]
[c]
[d]
[e] These fines are for unspayed or unneutered impounded animals only and are not in lieu of any fines or impound fees imposed the city.

The owner a dog for which a tag was issued may upon payment of five dollars and exhibition of evidence of current rabies vaccination receive a duplicate tag for the remaining portion of the period for which the original dog tag was issued. (Ord. 587 (part), 2009; Ord. 328 §3 (part), 1987).

An unpaid dog license fee shall become delinquent thirty days after it is due and payable. Upon delinquency, a ten-dollar penalty shall be added to the regular fee. Penalty fees shall accumulate and be added to each successive license period.

The owner of any animal which dies shall bury or otherwise dispose of such animal in a reasonable manner so as not to create a nuisance or health hazard.

Whenever he discovers a dead animal within the incorporated areas of the city which has not been properly disposed, the animal control officer shall order its owner to dispose of it properly. If his order is not promptly obeyed, the animal control officer is authorized to employ any person to dispose of the dead animal. If the owner of the dead animal can be determined, he or she shall pay twenty-five dollars to dispose of the animal while in the course of normal business hours. The owner shall pay fifty dollars for the performance of services after normal business hours. (Res. 2903 §2 (Exh. B (part)), 2013; Ord. 587 (part), 2009; Ord. 328 §3 (part), 1987).

With the exception of those acts expressly declared in any section of this chapter to be misdemeanors, any act in violation of the provisions of any section in this chapter is an infraction punishable by a fine of fifty dollars for the first offense, and for a second or subsequent offense a fine of one hundred dollars.

After a third offense, a criminal complaint may be filed against the violator in superior court. These fines shall be in addition to any cost or fee provided for in this chapter for the redemption or disposition of impounded animals. A person is guilty of a separate offense for each animal and for every day during which a violation of any of the provisions of this chapter is committed, continued or permitted by such person. (Ord. 587 (part), 2009; Ord. 460 §1 (part), 2002; Ord. 328 §3 (part), 1987).
29 223 of 252
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Series Id:

Series Title:

Area:

Item:

Base Period:

Years:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Percent Change 2012 233.441 234.537 236.941 236.866 237.032 236.025 235.776 237.222 238.104 240.111 237.675 236.042 236.648 2013 238.015 239.753 239.995 239.043 239.346 239.223 238.920 239.219 239.611 239.940 238.677 238.742 239.207 2014 239.857 241.059 242.491 242.437 243.362 243.528 243.727 243.556 243.623 243.341 241.753 240.475 242.434 2015 239.724 241.297 243.738 243.569 246.093 245.459 247.066 246.328 245.431 245.812 245.711 245.357 244.632 2016 247.155 247.113 247.873 248.368 249.554 249.789 249.784 249.700 250.145 251.098 250.185 250.189 249.246 2017 252.373 253.815 254.525 254.971 255.674 255.275 256.023 256.739 257.890 258.883 259.135 259.220 256.210 2018 261.235 263.012 264.158 265.095 266.148 265.522 266.007 266.665 268.032 269.482 268.560 267.631 265.962 2019 269.468 269.608 271.311 273.945 274.479 274.380 274.682 274.579 276.054 278.075 277.239 275.553 274.114 2020 277.755 278.657 276.589 275.853 276.842 278.121 279.899 280.116 279.366 279.947 280.102 279.560 278.567 2021 280.178 281.347 282.648 285.808 287.620 289.218 290.890 291.333 292.209 294.961 296.790 297.925 289.244 3.83% 2022 301.209 302.164 306.679
All items in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, all
urban consumers, not seasonally adjustedLos Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA All items
1982-84=100
2012 to 2022
CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U)
Original Data Value
CUURS49ASA0
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
224 of 252
.

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: M. Scott Hurlbert, City Manager
Maria O. Martinez, City Clerk
Lamar Rodgruez, City Treasurer

DATE: June 21, 2022

SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution placing two Ballot Measures on the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election if the Office of the City Clerk and City Treasurer should be filled by Election or appointment.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the adoption of a resolution placing two measures on the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election
giving the citizens of Wasco the opportunity to
decide if the Office of City Clerk and City Treasurer should be filled by election or appointment.

Discussion:

The duties of the City Clerk and City Treasurer have become more technical and complex over the years, with many regulations requiring specialized knowledge, training, and experience.

Most cities in California have appointive Clerk and Treasurer positio ns, allowing them to hire based on experience and credentials. Under an appointive process, the City would establish minimum qualifications for each position such as level of experience, education, professional certification and training , and perform reg ular performance evaluations.

The current qualifications for an elected City Clerk or City Treasurer are limited to candidates that are 18 years of age, or older, are registered voters and who reside within the city limits, and there are no performance evaluations.

Having a person perform these positions without the knowledge of the complex laws and regulations creates a liability for the City, and it takes specialized training and experience to properly administer their responsibilities.

City Clerk R
esponsibilities
The City Clerk must be knowledgeable and experienced in administering complex and ever-changing laws and regulations.

STAFF REPORT

City of Wasco

225 of 252
Most cities require training and certifications to ensure the City Clerk has the knowledge and experience to administer these important laws and regulations.

The City Clerk performs these primary duties:

• Assembles and prepares agendas
• Attest, publish and/or post ordinances and resolutions • Compliance with Brown Act (open meeting laws)
• Compliance with Political Reform Act (Fair Political Practices Commission Regulations)
• Compliance with Public Records Act (public access to the agency’s records) • Conducts City boards and commissions recruitments
• Conducts City elections (contracts for most functions with the County) • Serves as Clerk of the Council

City Treasurer R esponsibilities
Current law imposes specific duties on the City Treasurer which requires a specialized knowledge of municipal investments and banking.

The City Treasurer provides the following functions for the City, which are currently delegated to the Finance Director due to the technical and complex nature of regulations:

• Collects and Receives of all Funds
• Disbursement of all Funds
• Investments
• Timely and Accurate Financial Reports

Si
milar to the City Clerk’s position, laws, regulations and management systems required to successfully carry out these duties have evolved over time.

Advantages of Appointed Positions
While the current City Clerk and City Treasurer both professionally perform their responsibilities, there is no guarantee that any future holder of the elected position would have the necessary qualifications or experience to do so.

If these positions were appointive they would be held directly accountable to the elected City Cou ncil, and minimum qualifications and experience would ensure a qualified individual performs these functions . Any performance problems could be resolved immediately instead of waiting for the next election, or holding an expensive recall election.

The following list outlines some of the advantages of an appointed Clerk or Treasurer:

• The City can set specific requirements of education, training and background related to these positions, resulting in an appointment based on qualifications rather than politics.
• Elimination of liability from having an untrained person elected to the position. • The City can easily address performance issues.
• Appointed officials can focus solely on the job without worrying about running for election every four years.
226 of 252
• Increased oversight and accountability and more effective system of checks and balances.
• On-going estimated savings of $6,100.00 monthly vs. duplicate roles. (may vary)

Government Code Section 36508 requires a vote of the electorate to transition from an elected to an appointed City Clerk or City Treasurer.

The attached resolution also authorizes all members of the City Council, the City Clerk and the City Treasurer to prepare the argument in favor the measure, giving them priority over other arguments which may be submitted.

Summary:

Whether appointed or elected , the City Clerk and City Treasurer both work for the people.

The question is which selection process will produce the most qu alified persons to hold the positions, and ensure good performance in those positions over time?

City Councils in an overwhelming majority of California cities appoint their Clerks and Treasurers in the same way they appoint their City Managers and City Attorneys: They choose from candidates who are professionals in their field and make their selection based on experience and qualifications.

Many cities have changed to appointed City Clerks and City Treasurers (from elected) to ensure employees with t he knowledge, experience and qualifications perform these important functions.

Fiscal Impact:

The Cost related to the Kern County Election Department for Ballot Measures: Is unknow at this time.

There are signifant on-going estimated savings by making these positions appointed:

City Treasurer $3050.00 Monthly
City Clerk $3050.00 Monthly

Attachments:

1. Resolution placing a two (2) Measure regarding whether The position of City Clerk and City Treasurer should Be Elective or Appointive on the November 8, 2022 ballot

227 of 252
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 - ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WASCO, CALIFORNIA,

ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF A

MEASURE REGARDING WHETHER THE POSITION OF CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER SHOULD

BE ELECTIVE OR APPOINTIVE AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022

WHEREAS, the positions of the City Clerk and City Treasurer have become more complex and require specialized training and knowledge of various laws and regulations, which change frequently; and

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City that the positions of the City Clerk and the City Treasurer be appointive to ensure a qualified individual fills the position, properly performs the responsibilities of the position, and can be evaluated in the same manner as other employees ; and

WHEREAS, There will be an estimated on-going savings of $6100.00 monthly by making these positions appointive ; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to submit to the voters at the election a question relating to the positions of the City Clerk and the City Treasurer, transitioning from elected positions to appointed positions;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Wasco as follows:

SECTION 1: That the City Council, pursuant to its right and authority, does order submitted to the voters at the General Municipal Election the following question:

Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?
Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?

SECTION 2. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

SECTION 3. That the City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure.

SECTION 4. That the City Council authorizes all members of the City Council, the City Clerk and the City Treasurer to file a written argument In Favor of the City measure not exceeding 300 words, accompanied by the printed names and signatures of the authors) submitting it, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of California.

228 of 252
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022 - was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Wasco at a regular meeting thereof held on June 21, 2022, by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

__________________________

GILBERTO REYNA,
MAYOR of the City of Wasco

Attest:

__________________________________
MARIA O. MARTINEZ
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Wasco

229 of 252

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF WASCO

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: M . Scott Hurlbert, City Manager
Maria O. Martinez, City Clerk

DATE: June 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Discussion and Possible Minute Action to Appoint One Voting Delegate and Two Alternates for the League of California Cities 2022 Annual Conference and Expo held on September 7-9, 2022, in Long Beach, California. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council appoint one voting delegate and two alternates for the League of California Cities 2022 Annual Conference and Expo held on September 7 - 9, 2022, in Long Beach, California.

Discussion:

The League of California Cities requests the City Council appoint one voting delegate and two alternates for the League of California Cities 2022 Annual Conference and Expo. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business meeting on Friday, September 9, 2022. At this meeting, the League of California Cities membership considers and acts on resolutions establishing California Cities policy. In order to vote, the city council must designate a voting delegate and two alternates.

Attached to this staff report is the League of California Cities letter requesting the appointment of the voting delegate and alternates.

Fiscal Impact:

None

Attachments:

1. League of California Cities Letter

230 of 252
231 of 252
232 of 252
233 of 252
234 of 252
.

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: M. Scott Hurlbert, City Manager
Maria O. Martinez, Administrative Manager

DATE: June 21, 2022

SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to Appropriate Corona Virus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds under the American Resue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 to offer Complimentary Dial-a- Ride Services from July 2022 to August 31, 2022, a Summer Promotion.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends adopting a resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to Appropriate Corona Virus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds under the American Resue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 to offer Complimentary Dial-a-Ride Services from July 2022 to August 31, 2022, a Summer Promotion.

Background:

Throughout the pandemic , the transportation department has been impacted tremendously in all areas of the department. The services have been shut down several times during the pandemic. With the unstable reliability of the Dial -a-Ride, the ridership and fares have declined.

Discussion:

Assembly Bill 149 continues to provide temporary statutory relief for transit agenci es impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This bill temporarily suspends penalties associated with the Transportation Development Act’s requirements to obtain specified fixed percentages of the operating budgets from passenger fares (often called “farebox recovery ratio requirements”) throughout FY 2022-2023.

Staff’s goal is to regain the passenger’s trust and the reliability of the Dial-a-Ride services.

If the Council wishes to approve the resolution, this project will allow Dial-a-Ride to offer complimentary rides to all passengers within the city’s boundaries throughout this summer to help encourage ridership and promote public transportation.

Fiscal Impact:

The appropriation of ARPA fiscal recovery funds will not impact the City’s general budget.

STAFF REPORT
City of Wasco

235 of 252
Attachments:

1. Resolution

236 of 252
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WASCO AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPROPRIATE CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) OF 2021 TO OFFER COMPLIMENTARY DIAL-A-RIDE SERVICES FROM JULY 1, 2022, TO AUGUST 31, 2022, AS A SUMMER PROMOTION

WHEREAS, the City wishes to promote public transportation post covid; and

WHEREAS, the City of Wasco wishes to use ARPA funds to offer complimentary Dial-a-Ride services to all passengers within the city’s boundaries as a Summer promotion.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Wasco as follows:

SECTION 1: Authorizes the City Manager or his designee to appropriate ARPA funds not exceeding $2000.00 to promote public transportation by offering complimentary Dial-a-Ride services within the city’s boundaries from July 1, 2022 to August 31, 2022.

-o0o-

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022 - was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Wasco at a regular meeting thereof held on June 21, 2022, by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

237 of 252

__________________________

GILBERTO REYNA,
MAYOR of the City of Wasco

Attest:___________

__________________________________
MARIA O. MARTINEZ
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Wasco

238 of 252
.

STAFF REPORT
City of Wasco

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: M. Sco tt Hurlbert, City Manager
Isarel Perez-Hernandez, Finance Director

DATE: June 21, 2021

SUBJECT: Approval of A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or Designee to Appropriate Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) For Water, Sewer Infrastructure, And One-Time Essential Premium Pay, to Purchase land for the construction of Water Wells and Storage Tanks.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to appropriate Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds under the American Rescue Plan and of 2021 for Water, Sewer infrastructure, and one-time essential premium pay, to Purchase land for the construction of Water Wells and Storage Tanks. The apportionment is not to exceed $1.5M

Discussion:

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) appropriated Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds for allocation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury to states, counties, metropolitan cities, and small cities with populations under 50,000 (referred to as non-entitlement units of local government). Award amounts are based on each entity's share of the population within each group. The California Department of Finance received notification of the funds available and the list of non-entitlement units of local government and their respective populations via Treasury guidance issued on May 24, 2021. Based on this guidance, the state is required to allocate $1,218,261,277 to 291 small cities and towns in California, with Wasco to receive $6,868,042 total over two equal payments in July 2021 and July 2022. The first payment of $3, 434,021 has been received and the second payment will be made 12 months later.

City staff have used the last several months to comb through available information and regulations, confer with surrounding agencies, and review current budget priorities and needs to develop a proposed plan for just over half of Wasco’s allocation, funds that can be put to work in a relatively short amount of time for uses that dovetail with existing policy priorities of improving the City water system, including addressing deferred water system maintenance, investment in small downtown businesses, and retention of qualified and committed City staff who have diligently served the commun ity from the COVID -19 239 of 252
pandemic.

The planning and administration time required to put these funds to work is significant; therefore, the remaining unallocated portion of the Fiscal Recovery Funds - approximately $2.7 million, is still under consideration b y City staff, and plans for its careful use will be further developed over the coming months.

ARPA Fiscal Recovery Funds

From a policy perspective the Fiscal Recovery Funds are intended to:
• Support urgent COVI D-19 response efforts to continue to decrease spread of the virus and bring the pandemic under control;
• Replace lost revenue for eligible state, local, territorial, and Tribal governments to strengthen support for vital public services and help retain jobs; • Support immediate economic stabilization for households and businesses; • Address systemic public health and economic challenges that have contributed to the inequal impact of the pandemic.

From an operational standpoint, funds may be used:
• To respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; • To respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID -19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers; • For the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue due to the COVID -19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the emergency; • To make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure.

The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds provide flexibility for each government to meet local needs -including support for households, small businesses, impacted industries, essential workers, and the communities hardest hit by the crisis. These funds can also be used to make necessary investments in water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury has published an Interim Final Rule (IFR) that implements the provisions of this program. Staff has reviewed the document, conferred with staff in surrounding cities, and reviewed existing budget/project priorities to develop a proposed plan for just over half of Wasco’s Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, detailed below.

ARPA funds are requested to be allocated for several critical projects related to the City's municipal water system infrastructure. On October 6, 2020, the Council approved submitting a loan application of $25.8 million to the SWRCB to construct the following projects:

240 of 252

As reflected above, $2.8 million of the related costs for engineering and land acquisition for these projects will be funded by ARPA.

Well #15, 16, 17, 18 Environmental, Water Quality, and Land Purchase The State Water Board has established new Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) for 1,2,3 Trichloropropane (123TCP). Well, 8 currently does not meet the compliance standards and is approaching the end of its useful life; therefore, a new replacement well will be drilled to avoid 123TCP and treatment will be added to Well 12 to ensure compliance with the State Water Board regulations.

Cyber Security (SCADA) WTR/WW
The Programmable Logic Controller or “ PLC” automated system directs the treatment plant functions for the processing of wastewater at the Wasco facility. The automated controls are critical to the treatment process operations on a 24 -7 year-round schedule.

The current system was installed during the 1998 treatment plant expansion and has been experiencing increased maintenance and support issues.

Upgrading the 20 plus year- old PLC will increase operational efficiency, minimize staff overtime costs and ensure compliance with operational requirements. In particular, issues with monitoring water levels and control of headworks pumps affect plant efficiency and even operating permit violations. An update to the control system will correct both problems.

Also, at the Wastewater Plant, a new centrifuge was recently installed to dewater sludge.

The centrifuge taken out of services can be re furbished and reinstalled as a secondary unit to be utilized in dewatering sludge operations, especially during peak discharge times by industrial users.

The Supervisory Control and D ata Acquisition or “SCADA” system is used to remotely monitor equipment and processes at the treatment plant. Currently, the sewer lift stations are not connected to the SCADA system and have to be manually regulated. Adding the lift stations to the SCADA system will allow monitoring of those sites on a 24 -7 year-round schedule to ensure they are working properly in conjunction with the treatment plant operations. Once upgraded, the SCADA system usage can be standardized across other 241 of 252
Public Works facilities including water wells, tr eatment and tank operations, and even stormwater monitoring and pumping.

Storage Tank
The City of Wasco has no surface water sources and relies on groundwater to meet the water demands of Wasco residents and businesses. The City currently has no water storage facilities. Installation of a storage tank would provide an alternative source of water during well servicing, severe emergency, or unexpected Well downtime. A 2007 Water Feasibility study recommended the City install a water storage tank to ensure it can maintain adequate pressure and supply throughout the distribution system.

Centrifuge Sludge Pump
The two new sludge pumps will enable staff to maintain one set of operational pumps while the second set is on standby or undergoing maintenance to increase performance, efficiencies, and redundancy

Essential Workers Premium Pay
A one-time non- pensionable payment, within specific parameters, to eligible City employees

The U.S. Department of Treasury Final Interim Final Rule, 31 CFR Part 3 states, "Since the start of the COVID-19 public health emergency in January 2020, essential workers have put their physical wellbeing at risk to meet the daily needs of their communities and to provide care for others." And "During the public health emergency, emplo yers' policies on COVID-19- related hazard pay have varied widely, with many essential workers not yet compensated for the heightened risks they have faced and continue to face." And 'The Fiscal Recovery Funds will help respond to the needs of essential wor kers by allowing recipients to remunerate essential workers for the elevated health risks they have faced and continue to face during the public health emergency."

During the height of the pandemic, substantially all City services remained in full operation, with public facilities and staff offices reopened seven months after the pandemic was declared with appropriate safety and mitigation measures in place. In recognition of the organization-wide commitment, sacrifice and universal risk of exposure that management, and non-management employees worked through in a highly uncertain time

Numerous cities in the Central Valley have provided information concerning premium pay. In short, almost every city in the surrounding area is considering some form of premium pay for their employees, ranging from $ 1,500-$5,000/per employee flat payments to percentage-based payments.

Timeline & Rep
orting for Use of Fiscal Recovery Funds
The current regulations from the U.S. Treasury permits the funds to be used to cover costs incurred beginning on March 3, 2021. All funds must be obligated to their specific use by December 31, 2024 and fully expended by December 31, 2026.

Fiscal Impact:

The appropriation of ARPA Fiscal Recovery Funds will not adversely impact existing City funds, operations, or budgeted programs and projects. Fiscal Recovery Funds will have a significant positive effect of furthering existing policy priorities of improving the City's water 242 of 252
system, including addressing deferred water system maintenance, and retention of committed and qualified City staff.

From a cash flow standpoint, although 50% of the ARPA Fiscal Recovery funds have been received to date, the timeline of most of the proposed projects will stretch into the next calendar year and beyond, so it is unlikely that the fund established for ARPA funds will ever go into a negative status.

Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. NEU Allocation Amount – Wasco

243 of 252

RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WASCO AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER THE USE OF CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT OF 2021 (ARPA) FOR WATER, SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE, AND ONE-TIME ESSENTIAL PREMIUM PAY.

WHEREAS, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) appropriated Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds for allocation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury to states, counties, metropolitan cities, and small cities with populations under 50,000 (referred to as non-entitlement units of local government); and
WHEREAS, the City of Wasco shall receive $6,868,042 total over two equal payments in July 2021 and July 2022; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Treasury Final Interim Final Rule, 31 CFR Part 3 states, “Since the start of the COVID-19 public health emergency in January 2020, essential workers have put their physical wellbeing at risk to meet the daily needs of their communities and to provide care for others.” And “During the public health emergency, employers’ policies on COVID-19-related hazard pay have varied widely, with many essential workers not yet compensated for the heightened risks they have faced and continue to face.” And “The Fiscal Recovery Funds will help respond to the needs of essential workers by allowing recipients to renumerate essential workers for the elevated health risks they have faced and continue to face during the public health emergency.”; and WHEREAS, from a policy perspective the Fiscal Recovery Funds are intended to:
• Support urgent COVI D-19 response efforts to continue to decrease the spread of the virus and bring the pandemic under control;
• Replace lost revenue for the eligible state, local, territorial, and Tribal governments to strengthen support for vital public services and help retain jobs; • Support immediate economic stabilization for households and businesses; • Address systemic public health and economic c hallenges that have contributed to the in equal impact of the pandemic.

WHEREAS, from an operational standpoint, funds may be used:
• To respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality;
• To respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers; • For the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue due to the COVID-19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the emergency;
• To make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure.

WHEREAS, the City Manager may not appropriate ARPA monies in excess of $1.5M for the acquisition of land

244 of 252
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Wasco as follows:

SECTION 1: the City Council of the City of Wasco authorizes the City Manger the use of ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure.

SECTION 2: the City Council of the City of Wasco authorizes the City Manager or designee to appropriate $1.5M in ARPA money for the purchase of land where water wells and storage tanks will be constructed.

SECTION 3: the City Council of the City of Wasco authorizes the City Manger the use of ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Funds f or the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue due to the COVID -19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the emergency.

SECTION 4: the City Council of the City of Wasco authorizes the City Manger the use of ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Funds t o respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality.

-o0o-

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022 - was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Wasco at a regular meeting thereof held on June 21, 2022, by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

__________________________________

GILBERTO REYNA
MAYOR of the City of Wasco
Attest: ________________________

__________________________
MARIA O. MARTINEZ
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Wasco
245 of 252
Total Allocation $1,218,261,277
Total Small Cities Population 5,092,613
City/Town NEU
Recipient ID
2019
Population
Estimate 1/
Portion of
Population
Estimated
Allocation
Adelanto City CA0001 34,049 0.67% 8,145,245$ Agoura Hills City CA0002 20,222 0.40% 4,837,532$ Albany City CA0003 19,696 0.39% 4,711,702$
Alturas City CA0004 2,563 0.05% 613,124$
Amador City City CA0005 190 0.00% 45,452$ American Canyon City CA0006 20,475 0.40% 4,898,055$ Anderson City CA0007 10,630 0.21% 2,542,922$ Angels City CA0008 3,956 0.08% 946,359$
Arcata City CA0009 18,431 0.36% 4,409,087$
Arroyo Grande City CA0010 17,976 0.35% 4,300,241$ Artesia City CA0011 16,601 0.33% 3,971,312$ Arvin City CA0012 21,851 0.43% 5,227,224$
Atascadero City CA0013 30,075 0.59% 7,194,579$ Atherton Town CA0014 7,137 0.14% 1,707,322$ Atwater City CA0015 29,559 0.58% 7,071,141$ Auburn City CA0016 14,195 0.28% 3,395,746$
Avalon City CA0017 3,681 0.07% 880,573$
Avenal City CA0018 13,496 0.27% 3,228,530$
Azusa City CA0019 49,974 0.98% 11,954,843$
Banning City CA0020 31,221 0.61% 7,468,727$ Barstow City CA0021 23,915 0.47% 5,720,976$ Bell City CA0022 35,521 0.70% 8,497,378$
Bell Gardens City CA0023 42,012 0.82% 10,050,163$ Belmont City CA0024 26,941 0.53% 6,444,860$ Belvedere City CA0025 2,104 0.04% 503,322$ Benicia City CA0026 28,240 0.55% 6,755,608$ Beverly Hills City CA0027 33,792 0.66% 8,083,765$ Big Bear Lake City CA0028 5,279 0.10% 1,262,849$ Biggs City CA0029 1,879 0.04% 449,497$
Bishop City CA0030 3,747 0.07% 896,362$
Blue Lake City CA0031 1,245 0.02% 297,830$ Blythe City CA0032 19,682 0.39% 4,708,353$
Bradbury City CA0033 1,070 0.02% 255,967$ Brawley City CA0034 26,227 0.52% 6,274,056$ Brea City CA0035 43,255 0.85% 10,347,515$
Brisbane City CA0036 4,671 0.09% 1,117,402$ Buellton City CA0037 5,102 0.10% 1,220,507$ Burlingame City CA0038 30,889 0.61% 7,389,305$ Estimated Small City Allocations
Non-Entitlement Units of Local Governments (NEU)
1 246 of 252
City/Town NEU
Recipient ID
2019
Population
Estimate 1/
Portion of
Population
Estimated
Allocation
Calabasas City CA0039 23,853 0.47% 5,706,145$ Calexico City CA0040 39,825 0.78% 9,526,987$ California City City CA0041 14,198 0.28% 3,396,463$ Calimesa City CA0042 9,160 0.18% 2,191,267$ Calipatria City CA0043 7,114 0.14% 1,701,820$ Calistoga City CA0044 5,247 0.10% 1,255,194$ Campbell City CA0045 41,793 0.82% 9,997,774$ Canyon Lake City CA0046 11,280 0.22% 2,698,416$ Capitola City CA0047 10,010 0.20% 2,394,605$ Carmel-by-the-Sea City CA0048 3,811 0.07% 911,672$ Carpinteria City CA0049 13,385 0.26% 3,201,977$ Ceres City CA0050 48,706 0.96% 11,651,510$
Chowchilla City CA0051 18,310 0.36% 4,380,141$ Claremont City CA0052 36,266 0.71% 8,675,598$ Clayton City CA0053 12,265 0.24% 2,934,049$ Clearlake City CA0054 15,267 0.30% 3,652,191$ Cloverdale City CA0055 8,656 0.17% 2,070,699$ Coachella City CA0056 45,743 0.90% 10,942,698$ Coalinga City CA0057 17,179 0.34% 4,109,582$ Colfax City CA0058 2,002 0.04% 478,921$
Colma Town CA0059 1,489 0.03% 356,200$
Colusa City CA0060 6,060 0.12% 1,449,681$ Commerce City CA0061 12,661 0.25% 3,028,780$ Corning City CA0062 7,710 0.15% 1,844,396$ Coronado City CA0063 23,731 0.47% 5,676,960$ Corte Madera Town CA0064 9,751 0.19% 2,332,646$ Cotati City CA0065 7,410 0.15% 1,772,630$ Covina City CA0066 47,450 0.93% 11,351,049$ Crescent City City CA0067 6,787 0.13% 1,623,595$ Cudahy City CA0068 23,569 0.46% 5,638,206$
Culver City City CA0069 39,185 0.77% 9,373,885$ Cypress City CA0070 49,006 0.96% 11,723,277$ Dana Point City CA0071 33,577 0.66% 8,032,332$ Danville Town CA0072 44,510 0.87% 10,647,738$ Del Mar City CA0073 4,319 0.08% 1,033,197$ Del Rey Oaks City CA0074 1,654 0.03% 395,672$ Desert Hot Springs City CA0075 28,878 0.57% 6,908,231$ Dinuba City CA0076 24,461 0.48% 5,851,591$
Dixon City CA0077 20,698 0.41% 4,951,402$
Dorris City CA0078 897 0.02% 214,581$
Dos Palos City CA0079 5,527 0.11% 1,322,176$ Duarte City CA0080 21,271 0.42% 5,088,475$
Dunsmuir City CA0081 1,564 0.03% 374,142$ East Palo Alto City CA0082 29,314 0.58% 7,012,532$ El Cerrito City CA0083 25,508 0.50% 6,102,056$ El Segundo City CA0084 16,610 0.33% 3,973,465$ 2 247 of 252
City/Town NEU
Recipient ID
2019
Population
Estimate 1/
Portion of
Population
Estimated
Allocation
Emeryville City CA0085 12,086 0.24% 2,891,228$ Escalon City CA0086 7,574 0.15% 1,811,862$ Etna City CA0087 718 0.01% 171,761$
Eureka City CA0088 26,710 0.52% 6,389,600$
Exeter City CA0089 10,485 0.21% 2,508,235$
Fairfax Town CA0090 7,522 0.15% 1,799,422$ Farmersville City CA0091 10,703 0.21% 2,560,385$ Ferndale City CA0092 1,352 0.03% 323,427$ Fillmore City CA0093 15,870 0.31% 3,796,441$ Firebaugh City CA0094 8,296 0.16% 1,984,580$ Fort Bragg City CA0095 7,291 0.14% 1,744,162$ Fort Jones City CA0096 692 0.01% 165,541$ Fortuna City CA0097 12,259 0.24% 2,932,613$ Foster City City CA0098 33,901 0.67% 8,109,840$ Fowler City CA0099 6,790 0.13% 1,624,312$ Galt City CA0100 26,536 0.52% 6,347,975$
Gonzales City CA0101 8,306 0.16% 1,986,972$ Grand Terrace City CA0102 12,584 0.25% 3,010,360$ Grass Valley City CA0103 12,817 0.25% 3,066,099$ Greenfield City CA0104 17,516 0.34% 4,190,200$ Gridley City CA0105 7,246 0.14% 1,733,397$ Grover Beach City CA0106 13,459 0.26% 3,219,679$ Guadalupe City CA0107 7,783 0.15% 1,861,859$ Gustine City CA0108 5,882 0.12% 1,407,099$ Half Moon Bay City CA0109 12,932 0.25% 3,093,609$ Hawaiian Gardens City CA0110 14,159 0.28% 3,387,134$ Healdsburg City CA0111 11,845 0.23% 2,833,576$ Hercules City CA0112 26,276 0.52% 6,285,778$ Hermosa Beach City CA0113 19,320 0.38% 4,621,755$ Hidden Hills City CA0114 1,890 0.04% 452,128$ Hillsborough Town CA0115 11,387 0.22% 2,724,012$ Hollister City CA0116 40,740 0.80% 9,745,874$ Holtville City CA0117 6,621 0.13% 1,583,884$ Hughson City CA0118 7,565 0.15% 1,809,709$ Huron City CA0119 7,281 0.14% 1,741,770$
Imperial City CA0120 18,120 0.36% 4,334,689$ Imperial Beach City CA0121 27,440 0.54% 6,564,231$ Indian Wells City CA0122 5,470 0.11% 1,308,540$ Industry City CA0123 202 0.00% 48,323$ Ione City CA0124 8,568 0.17% 2,049,648$
Irwindale City CA0125 1,446 0.03% 345,914$ Isleton City CA0126 844 0.02% 201,903$ Jackson City CA0127 4,840 0.10% 1,157,831$ Kerman City CA0128 15,282 0.30% 3,655,779$
King City City CA0129 14,077 0.28% 3,367,518$ Kingsburg City CA0130 12,108 0.24% 2,896,491$ 3 248 of 252
City/Town NEU
Recipient ID
2019
Population
Estimate 1/
Portion of
Population
Estimated
Allocation
La Cañada Flintridge City CA0131 20,009 0.39% 4,786,578$ Lafayette City CA0132 26,638 0.52% 6,372,376$ Laguna Beach City CA0133 22,827 0.45% 5,460,704$ Laguna Hills City CA0134 31,207 0.61% 7,465,378$ Laguna Woods City CA0135 15,850 0.31% 3,791,657$ La Habra Heights City CA0136 6,492 0.13% 1,553,024$ Lakeport City CA0137 5,006 0.10% 1,197,542$ La Mirada City CA0138 48,183 0.95% 11,526,398$ La Palma City CA0139 15,428 0.30% 3,690,706$ La Puente City CA0140 39,614 0.78% 9,476,511$ La Quinta City CA0141 41,748 0.82% 9,987,009$ Larkspur City CA0142 12,254 0.24% 2,931,417$ Lathrop City CA0143 24,483 0.48% 5,856,854$ La Verne City CA0144 31,974 0.63% 7,648,860$ Lawndale City CA0145 32,389 0.64% 7,748,137$ Lemon Grove City CA0146 26,811 0.53% 6,413,761$ Lemoore City CA0147 26,725 0.52% 6,393,188$ Lincoln City CA0148 48,275 0.95% 11,548,406$ Lindsay City CA0149 13,463 0.26% 3,220,636$ Live Oak City CA0150 8,912 0.17% 2,131,940$ Livingston City CA0151 14,896 0.29% 3,563,440$ Loma Linda City CA0152 24,482 0.48% 5,856,615$ Lomita City CA0153 20,320 0.40% 4,860,976$
Loomis Town CA0154 6,866 0.13% 1,642,493$ Los Alamitos City CA0155 11,399 0.22% 2,726,883$ Los Altos City CA0156 30,089 0.59% 7,197,928$ Los Altos Hills Town CA0157 8,423 0.17% 2,014,961$ Los Banos City CA0158 41,036 0.81% 9,816,683$ Los Gatos Town CA0159 30,222 0.59% 7,229,745$ Loyalton City CA0160 702 0.01% 167,933$ McFarland City CA0161 15,506 0.30% 3,709,365$ Malibu City CA0162 11,820 0.23% 2,827,595$
Mammoth Lakes Town CA0163 8,235 0.16% 1,969,987$ Manhattan Beach City CA0164 35,183 0.69% 8,416,521$ Maricopa City CA0165 1,192 0.02% 285,152$ Marina City CA0166 22,781 0.45% 5,449,699$
Martinez City CA0167 38,297 0.75% 9,161,456$ Maywood City CA0168 26,973 0.53% 6,452,515$ Mendota City CA0169 11,511 0.23% 2,753,676$ Menlo Park City CA0170 34,698 0.68% 8,300,499$ Millbrae City CA0171 22,394 0.44% 5,357,121$ Mill Valley City CA0172 14,259 0.28% 3,411,056$ Monrovia City CA0173 36,331 0.71% 8,691,147$ Montague City CA0174 1,398 0.03% 334,431$ Montclair City CA0175 40,083 0.79% 9,588,706$ Monte Sereno City CA0176 3,427 0.07% 819,811$ 4 249 of 252
City/Town NEU
Recipient ID
2019
Population
Estimate 1/
Portion of
Population
Estimated
Allocation
Moorpark City CA0177 36,375 0.71% 8,701,673$ Moraga Town CA0178 17,783 0.35% 4,254,072$
Morgan Hill City CA0179 45,952 0.90% 10,992,695$ Morro Bay City CA0180 10,543 0.21% 2,522,110$ Mount Shasta City CA0181 3,274 0.06% 783,210$ Needles City CA0182 4,976 0.10% 1,190,365$ Nevada City City CA0183 3,148 0.06% 753,069$ Newark City CA0184 49,149 0.97% 11,757,485$ Newman City CA0185 11,784 0.23% 2,818,983$
Norco City CA0186 26,604 0.52% 6,364,242$
Oakdale City CA0187 23,596 0.46% 5,644,665$ Oakley City CA0188 42,543 0.84% 10,177,190$ Ojai City CA0189 7,470 0.15% 1,786,983$
Orange Cove City CA0190 10,273 0.20% 2,457,520$ Orinda City CA0191 19,926 0.39% 4,766,723$
Orland City CA0192 7,827 0.15% 1,872,385$ Oroville City CA0193 20,737 0.41% 4,960,731$ Pacifica City CA0194 38,546 0.76% 9,221,023$ Pacific Grove City CA0195 15,413 0.30% 3,687,117$ Palos Verdes Estates City CA0196 13,273 0.26% 3,175,184$ Parlier City CA0197 15,618 0.31% 3,736,158$ Patterson City CA0198 22,524 0.44% 5,388,220$ Piedmont City CA0199 11,135 0.22% 2,663,729$ Pinole City CA0200 19,250 0.38% 4,605,009$
Pismo Beach City CA0201 8,168 0.16% 1,953,959$ Placerville City CA0202 11,175 0.22% 2,673,298$ Pleasant Hill City CA0203 34,839 0.68% 8,334,229$ Plymouth City CA0204 1,076 0.02% 257,402$ Point Arena City CA0205 449 0.01% 107,410$ Port Hueneme City CA0206 21,926 0.43% 5,245,165$ Portola City CA0207 1,930 0.04% 461,697$
Portola Valley Town CA0208 4,568 0.09% 1,092,763$ Rancho Mirage City CA0209 18,528 0.36% 4,432,291$ Rancho Palos Verdes City CA0210 41,530 0.82% 9,934,859$ Red Bluff City CA0211 14,539 0.29% 3,478,038$ Reedley City CA0212 25,658 0.50% 6,137,939$ Ridgecrest City CA0213 28,973 0.57% 6,930,957$ Rio Dell City CA0214 3,349 0.07% 801,152$ Rio Vista City CA0215 9,718 0.19% 2,324,752$ Ripon City CA0216 16,386 0.32% 3,919,879$
Riverbank City CA0217 24,881 0.49% 5,952,064$ Rohnert Park City CA0218 43,291 0.85% 10,356,127$ Rolling Hills City CA0219 1,845 0.04% 441,363$ Rolling Hills Estates City CA0220 8,058 0.16% 1,927,645$ Ross Town CA0221 2,451 0.05% 586,331$
St. Helena City CA0222 6,102 0.12% 1,459,728$ 5 250 of 252
City/Town NEU
Recipient ID
2019
Population
Estimate 1/
Portion of
Population
Estimated
Allocation
San Anselmo Town CA0223 12,476 0.24% 2,984,524$ San Bruno City CA0224 42,807 0.84% 10,240,344$ San Carlos City CA0225 30,185 0.59% 7,220,894$ Sand City City CA0226 399 0.01% 95,449$ San Dimas City CA0227 33,621 0.66% 8,042,858$ San Fernando City CA0228 24,322 0.48% 5,818,339$ San Gabriel City CA0229 39,899 0.78% 9,544,689$ Sanger City CA0230 25,339 0.50% 6,061,627$
San Jacinto City CA0231 49,215 0.97% 11,773,274$ San Joaquin City CA0232 4,021 0.08% 961,909$ San Juan Bautista City CA0233 2,104 0.04% 503,322$ San Juan Capistrano City CA0234 35,911 0.71% 8,590,675$ San Marino City CA0235 13,048 0.26% 3,121,359$ San Pablo City CA0236 30,990 0.61% 7,413,467$ Santa Fe Springs City CA0237 17,630 0.35% 4,217,471$ Santa Paula City CA0238 29,806 0.59% 7,130,229$ Saratoga City CA0239 30,153 0.59% 7,213,239$ Sausalito City CA0240 7,068 0.14% 1,690,816$ Scotts Valley City CA0241 11,757 0.23% 2,812,524$ Seal Beach City CA0242 23,896 0.47% 5,716,431$ Sebastopol City CA0243 7,674 0.15% 1,835,784$ Selma City CA0244 24,825 0.49% 5,938,668$
Shafter City CA0245 20,401 0.40% 4,880,353$ Shasta Lake City CA0246 10,413 0.20% 2,491,011$ Sierra Madre City CA0247 10,793 0.21% 2,581,915$ Signal Hill City CA0248 11,421 0.22% 2,732,146$ Solana Beach City CA0249 13,296 0.26% 3,180,686$ Soledad City CA0250 25,999 0.51% 6,219,513$ Solvang City CA0251 5,838 0.11% 1,396,574$ Sonoma City CA0252 11,024 0.22% 2,637,175$
Sonora City CA0253 4,864 0.10% 1,163,572$ South El Monte City CA0254 20,574 0.40% 4,921,738$ South Lake Tahoe City CA0255 22,197 0.44% 5,309,994$ South Pasadena City CA0256 25,329 0.50% 6,059,235$ Stanton City CA0257 38,139 0.75% 9,123,659$ Suisun City City CA0258 29,663 0.58% 7,096,020$ Susanville City CA0259 15,010 0.29% 3,590,711$ Sutter Creek City CA0260 2,622 0.05% 627,238$ Taft City CA0261 9,272 0.18% 2,218,059$
Tehachapi City CA0262 13,011 0.26% 3,112,508$ Tehama City CA0263 373 0.01% 89,230$
Temple City City CA0264 35,811 0.70% 8,566,752$ Tiburon Town CA0265 9,084 0.18% 2,173,086$ Trinidad City CA0266 355 0.01% 84,924$ Truckee Town CA0267 16,735 0.33% 4,003,368$ Tulelake City CA0268 978 0.02% 233,958$ 6 251 of 252
City/Town NEU
Recipient ID
2019
Population
Estimate 1/
Portion of
Population
Estimated
Allocation
Twentynine Palms City CA0269 26,073 0.51% 6,237,216$ Ukiah City CA0270 15,995 0.31% 3,826,344$
Vernon City CA0271 110 0.00% 26,314$
Villa Park City CA0272 5,790 0.11% 1,385,091$ Walnut City CA0273 29,685 0.58% 7,101,283$
Wasco City CA0274 28,710 0.56% 6,868,042$
Waterford City CA0275 8,962 0.18% 2,143,901$ Weed City CA0276 2,725 0.05% 651,878$
West Hollywood City CA0277 36,475 0.72% 8,725,595$ Westlake Village City CA0278 8,217 0.16% 1,965,681$ Westmorland City CA0279 2,254 0.04% 539,205$ Wheatland City CA0280 3,873 0.08% 926,504$ Wildomar City CA0281 37,229 0.73% 8,905,968$ Williams City CA0282 5,408 0.11% 1,293,709$ Willits City CA0283 4,890 0.10% 1,169,792$ Willows City CA0284 6,072 0.12% 1,452,551$ Windsor Town CA0285 27,128 0.53% 6,489,594$ Winters City CA0286 7,315 0.14% 1,749,903$ Woodlake City CA0287 7,658 0.15% 1,831,956$ Woodside Town CA0288 5,458 0.11% 1,305,670$ Yountville City CA0289 2,966 0.06% 709,530$ Yreka City CA0290 7,518 0.15% 1,798,465$
Yucca Valley Town CA0291 21,777 0.43% 5,209,521$ 1/Source: U.S. Treasury: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local- and-tribal-governments/state-and-local-fiscal-recovery-fund/non-entitlement-units 7 252 of 252

Wasco City CouncilJune 21, 2022

Wasco City Council
June 21, 2022