Agenda — Wasco City Council, October 7, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, October 7, 2025

Public advisory: Face masks are recommended. The City C ouncil chamber is open and accessible to the public.

View the meeting Live on the city’s website
https://www.cityofwasco.org/306/city-council-meeting-videos subject to technical limitations.

ACCESSIBILITY: In
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in the City Council meeting, please contact the City Clerk Department at 661-758-7215 or via email at [email protected] within 48 hours of the meeting or sooner.

Th
e following is provided to assist with public participation:

AGENDA AVAILABILITY : T he City Council Agenda is posted on the bulletin board at the entrance of City Hall, 746 8th Street, Wasco, at the entrance of 764 E Street, Wasco, and at the entrance of the Wasco Police Department’s Office, 748 F Street, Wasco. The agenda packet, meeting minutes, and archived City Council meetings are avai lable on the City’s website, www.cityofwasco.org.

AGENDA MATERIALS: Cit y Council agenda materials are released no later than 72 hours prior to a meeting and are available to the public at the City Clerk’s Office, 746 8th Street, Wasco, CA, in a public binder at each City Council meeting, and on the City’s website at https://www.cityofwasco.org/AgendaCenter

PUBLIC COMMENTS: A
ll public comments are subject to a 2 -minute limit, and a maximum of thirty (30) minutes will be allowed for any subject. To provide your comments to the City Councilmembers regarding matters not on the agenda or a specific item on the agenda, you may address your comments IN PERSON. Before making your presentation, you will be asked to state your name for the record . If you would like to submit a written public comment, please email the City Clerk at [email protected] no later than 4 :00 p.m. on October 7, 2025.

Please clearly indicate which agenda item number your comments pertain to. Every effort will be made to read your comment into the record . If a comment is received after the specific time mentioned above but before the meeting is adjourned, the comment will still be included as part of the record of the meeting. Still, it will not be read into the record.

Pl
ease be advised that communications directed to the City Council are public records and are subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act and Brown Act unless AGENDA
Regular City Council Meeting,
Successor Agency to the
Former Redevelopment Agency and the
Wasco Public Finance Authority

Tuesday, October 7, 2025 – 6:00 pm.

Council Chambers
746 8th Street, Wasco, CA 93280
www.cityofwasco.org

1 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, October 7, 2025 exempt from disclosure under the applicable law. Communications will NOT be edited for redactions and will be printed/posted as submitted.

SPANISH INTERPRETATION: If you need an interpretation of your communications to t he City Council from Spanish into English, please get in touch with the City Clerk Department at 661- 758-7215 or via email at [email protected]. Subject to availability, notifying the City at least 48 hours before will usually enable it to make arrangements.

INTERPRETACIÓN EN ESPAÑOL: Si necesita una interpretación de sus comunicaciones al Concejo Municipal del español al inglés, comuníquese con el Departamento del Secretari o de la Ciudad al 661 -758-7215 o por correo electrónico a [email protected] . La notificación de al menos 48 horas generalmente permitirá a la Ciudad hacer arreglos. Sujeto a dis
ponibilidad.

REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 pm

1) CALL TO ORDER: Mayor

2) ROLL CALL: Mayor Medina, Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, Council Members: Martinez, Raya, Reyna

3) FLAG SALUTE: by Mayor Medina

4) INVOCATION: by

5) APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

6) PRESENTATIONS:
a. Proclamation - Domestic Violence awareness month – Lideres de Campesinas

b. Recognition – 2024 Wasco Rose Queen

7) PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA:

This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Council , including the Council acting as the Governing Board for the Successor Agency, on any matter not on this agenda over which the Council and Successor Agency have jurisdiction. Speakers are li mited to two (2) minutes. A maximum of thirty (30) minutes will be allowed for an y one subject. Please state your name for the record before making yo
ur presentation.

BROWN ACT REQUIREMENTS: The Brown Act does not allow action or Discussion on items not on the agenda (subject to narrow ex ceptions). This will limit a Councilmember’s response to questions and requests during this comment period. 8) SUCCESSOR AGENCY BUSINESS: None

9) WASCO PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY BUSINESS: None

10) PUBLIC SAFETY REPORTS
a. Kern County Fire Department (Appleton)
b. Wasco Police Department (Mora)
2 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, October 7, 2025 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS:
11) CONSENT CALENDAR:

The Consent Calendar consists of items that are routine and noncontroversial, in the staff's opinion. These items are approved in one motion unless a Council Member or member of the public requests the removal of a particular item.
a. Receive and File department payments totaling $916,403.74

b. Approval of City Council Minutes for:

1. August 5, 2025, Regular Meeting

2. September 2, 2025, Regular Meeting

3. September 16, 2025, Regular Meeting

c. Council finds this action is not a “ project” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Approval of Travel and Training Expenses Exceeding $500.00 for Police Department Sworn Personnel to Attend the RIMSCON 28 Conference by Sun Ridge Systems from October 13-17, 2025, in Lake Tahoe. CA.

d. Council finds this action is not a “project” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or Designee to Execute the First Amendment to Agreement No. 2021-001 with Adams Ashby Group Inc., to Perform all Compliance Monitoring as Required by the HOME Program Loan made by the City in 2006 in an amount not to exceed $17,500 over a 5-year period.

e. Council finds this action , based on the evidence in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the approval of the Water System Improvement and Treatment Project, will not have a significant environmental impact; Accept all Bids and Authorize the City Manager or Designee to Sign and Execute an Agreement with Arsenal Well Drilling Inc. for Drilling of Four Casing Hammer Test Water Wells Project as part of the City’s State Revolving Fund Water System Improvement and Treatment Project in an amount not to exceed $1.6 million.

f. Council finds this action is not a “project” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Approving the City's Annual Calendar for the 2026 Calendar Year.

g. Council finds this action is not a “project” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Approval of Travel and Training Expenses Exceeding $500 per participant for City Manager and Assistant City Manager to attend the Kern County City Managers Training Conference, November 5th - 7th, 2025, in Pismo Beach, CA.

h. Council finds this action is not a “project” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or Designee to Execute the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grant Agreement PT26155 – Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP), Approve Budget Appropriations, and Any Amendments.

12) PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Council finds this action is not a “project” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Con duct a Public Hearing to Discuss the City’s Community Development Block Grant Closeout of 20-CDBG-CV2-3-00010 Grant. (Villa) 3 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, October 7, 2025 13) DEFERRED BUSINESS: None

14) NEW BUSINESS:
a. Wasco Recreation Parks District Project Update- Information only (Cobb)

b. Council finds this action is not a “project” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Approving the Amended Salary Schedule for the Fiscal Year 202 5-2026 in Compliance with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) Requirement for Publicly Available Pay Schedules. (Hurlbert)

c. Council finds this action is not a “project” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution to ratify the Memorandum of Agreement Between Kern Council of Governments and City of Wasco for the 2026 Community- Based Outreach Mini -Grant Program, part of the 2026 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, and has been signed by the City Manager. (Lara)

d. Council finds this action is not a “proje ct” as defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Consideration of a Letter Requesting Governor Newsom to Veto Senate Bill 707 (SB 707). (Hurlbert)

e. Update to the council on the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) from the public hearing held on September 17, 2025. (Villa)

15) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES:
a. Kern Economic Development Corporation (Medina)
b. Kern Council of Governments (Reyna)
c. Wasco Task Force (Saldaña and Medina)
16) REPORTS FROM THE CITY MANAGER:

17) REPORTS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL:

18) CLOSED SESSION:

a. Closed Session Minutes for September 16, 2025.

b. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS 54956.8
Property: A portion of APN 4987-010-83
City negotiator: City Manager
Negotiating parties: The Towers LLC
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Amerivet Contracting, a California Corporation

4 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, October 7, 2025 d. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: LEO Towing

19) CLOSED SESSION ACTION:

20) ADJOURNMENT:

This is to certify that this agenda was posted at Wasco City Hall on Octo ber 2, 2025, on/or before 6:00 p.m. The agenda is also available on the City website at www.cityofwasco.org.

_________________________________
Maria O. Martinez, CMC
City Clerk

All agenda item supporting documentation is available for public review o n the city website , www.cityofwasco.org, and the office of the City Clerk of the City of Wasco, 746 8 th Street, Wasco, CA 93280 , during regular business hours, 8:00 am – 4:30 pm Monday through Thursday and 8:30 am – 4:30 pm Friday (closed alternate Friday's), following the posting of the agenda. Any supporting documentation related to an agenda item for an open session of any regular meeting that is distributed after the agenda is posted and prior to the meeting will also be available for review at the same location and available at the meeting. Please remember to turn off all cell phones, pagers, or electronic devices during Council meetings.

The City of Wasco does not discriminate on the basis of disability in access to, provision of, or employment in its programs and activities pursuant to 29 United States Code Section 12132 and California Civil Code Section 54.

The City Clerk's Office can provide information regarding the rights provided under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (661) 758- 7215 to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Telephone (661) 758 -7215.

Requests for assistance should be made at least two (2) days in advance whenever possible.

5 of 676
6 of 676
7 of 676
8 of 676
9 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, August 5, 2025

MINUTES

WASCO CITY COUNCIL
and Successor Agency to the
Former Redevelopment Agency
Tuesday, August 5, 2025
Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers
746 8th Street, Wasco, CA 93280

REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 pm

1) CALL TO ORDER: Mayor
Mayor Medina called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

2) ROLL CALL: Mayor Medina, Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, Council Members: Martinez, Raya, Reyna
PRESENT: Mayor Medina, Council Members: Raya, Reyna
ABSENT: Council Members: Saldaña, Martinez

STAFF PRESENT: City Manager M. Scott Hurlbert, City Attorney Tom Schroeter, Assistant City Manager Maria Lara, Deputy City Clerk Monica Flores, Deputy City Clerk Tinajero , Public Works Director Luis Villa, Community Development Director Keri Cobb , Police Lieutenant Galutira

3) FLAG SALUTE: by Mayor Medina

4) INVOCATION: observed a moment of silence

5) APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

City Manager Hurlbert requested that agenda item 14.a. be deferred to a future meeting when there is a full quorum.

Motion by Council Member Reyna, seconded by Council Member Raya, to approve the agenda with item 14.a. to be deferred to a future meeting when there is a full quorum by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ
6) PRESENTATIONS:
a. BeWith - Community Calendar Platform
Virtual presentation with Asaf Heilig, Chief Growth Officer.

10 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, August 5, 2025

7) PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA:

There were no public comments.

Deputy Clerk Tinajero mentioned that there are no email comments for this item or any other agenda items.

8) SUCCESSOR AGENCY BUSINESS: None

9) WASCO PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY BUSINESS: None

10) PUBLIC SAFETY REPORTS
a. Kern County Fire Department (Appleton)
No reports – Chief Appleton absent
b. Wasco Police Department (Fivecoat)
Lieutenant Galutira gave a recent crime report.

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS:
11) CONSENT CALENDAR:

b. Approval of City Council Minutes for:

1. July 15, 2025, Regular meeting

2. July 28, 2025, Special meeting

c. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Amending the Joint Powers Agreement of the Central San Joaquin Valley Risk Management Authority.

Reso#2025-4241

d. Council finds the Ordinance exempt from the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(B)(2) and (B)(3) and Section 15061; Adopt and Waive the Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Wasco amending Title 9 of the City of Wasco Municipal Code, adding Chapter 9.20, Offenses Against Public Decency.

Ord#2025-728

e. Council finds the Ordinance exempt from the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(B)(2) and (B)(3) and Section 15061; Adopt and Waive the Second Reading of a n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Wasco amending Section

10.36.100 of Chapter 10.36 (Stopping, Standing and Parking) of Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the City of Wasco Municipal Code to prohibi t human -powered vending upon streets, roads and bicycle lanes and finding the Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(B)(2) and (B)(3) and Section 15061.

Ord#2025-729

f. Council finds the Ordinance exempt from the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(B)(2) and (B)(3) and Section 15061; Adopt and Waive the Second Reading 11 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, August 5, 2025 of a n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Wasco amending Section

12.32.020 (Definitions) of Chapter 12.32 (Unlawful Camping in Public Places) of Title 12 (Streets, Sidewalks and Public Places) of the City of Wasco Municipal Code.

Ord#2025-730

g. Council finds the Ordinance exempt from the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(B)(2) and (B)(3) and Section 15061; Adopt and Waive the Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Wasco amending Title 10 of the City of Wasco Municipal Code adding Chapter 10.54, Rotational Towing.

Ord#2025-731

h. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution that Authorizes the City Manager or Designee to Approve the Proposal and Authorize the Purchase Order with West and Associates for Updating the Cross-Connection Control Plan for the City of Wasco in an amount not to exceed $25,000.00.

Reso#2025-4242

i. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution authorizing the County of Kern to levy and collect a Special Tax on properties within City of Wasco Comm unity Facilities District No. 2017-01.

Reso#2025-4243

j. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the County of Kern to Levy and Collect a Special Tax on P roperties within City of Wasco Community Facilities District No. 2020-01
Reso#2025-4244

k. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Wasco Confirming the Assessment for the Levy and Collection of Assessments within Special Tax Assessments within Special Tax Area Zone 2005 -1 within the Wasco Special Police Tax Area Subdivision for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

Reso#2025-4245

l. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt the Resolutions of the City Council of the City of Wasco Confirming the Assessment for the Levy and Collection of Assessments within Special Tax Assessments within Special Tax Area Zone 2006 -01, 2006-02, and 2006- 03 within the Wasco Special Police Tax Area Subdivision for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

Reso#2025-4246
Reso#2025-4247
Reso#2025-4248

m. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Wasco Confirming the Assessment for the Levy and Collection of Assessments within Sewer Lift Station District 2008-01 for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

Reso#2025-4249

12 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, August 5, 2025 There was no conflict of interest on the consent calendar for any Council members.

Motion by Council Member Reyna, seconded by Council Member Raya, to approve the Consent Calendar with the noted spelling typo correction from Rick to Risk in the staff report for item 11.c. by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: REYNA

12) PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Council finds that this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Amending the Traffic Impact Fee Rate Schedule pursuant to Chapter 13.24 of the Wasco Municipal Code 02-4269.

Reso#2025-4250
Oral presentation by Public Works Director Luis Villa.

Mayor Medina opened the public hearing at 6:30 p.m.

There were no public comments.

Mayor Medina closed the public hearing at 6:30 p.m.

Motion by Mayor Medina, seconded by Council Member Reyna, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ

b. Council finds that this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt the Resolutions Confirming the Diagram and Assessment for the Levy and Collection of Assessments within Maintenance District No. 1, Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 01 -01, Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 01-02, Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 06-1, and Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District 2017 -1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

Reso#2025-4251
Reso#2025-4252
Reso#2025-4253
Reso#2025-4254
Reso#2025-4255
Oral presentation by Public Works Director Luis Villa.

Mayor Medina opened the public hearing at 6:32 p.m.

There were no public comments.

Mayor Medina closed the public hearing at 6:32 p.m.

13 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, August 5, 2025 Motion by Council Member Reyna , seconded by Mayor Medina , to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ
13) DEFERRED BUSINESS: None

14) NEW BUSINESS:
a. Council finds that this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Possible Minute Action to Appoint One Voting Delegate and Two Alternates for the League of California Cities 2025 Annual Conference and Expo held on October 8th -10th, 2025, in Long Beach, California.

Item Deferred

15) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES:
a. Kern Economic Development Corporation (Medina)
No reports.

b. Kern Council of Governments (Reyna)
Council Member Reyna: P rovided a recent report for the Kern Council of Governments meeting on July 17, 2025.

c. Wasco Task Force (Saldaña and Medina)
Mayor Medina: There was a good turnout for the July cleanup event at Central Park. For the August event, and will discuss the plans with Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña.

16) REPORTS FROM THE CITY MANAGER:

City Manager Hurlbert updated the city council on the following:
• Police Activity League PAL Update: The PAL building is now open, and there is a good return attendance from the youth.
• There will be a Back to School event on Tuesday, August 12, 2025, from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the PAL building.
• Community Breakfast meeting tomorrow at 7:00 a.m., held at the Independence High School Adult Center.
• The hours the PAL building doors will open at 2:00 p.m. and close around 5:00 p.m. or 5:30 p.m. Once school starts, the closing hours may extend to either 6:00 p.m. or 6:30 p.m. It is a matter of staffing and having the volunteers and coaches who can work the extended hours.
• SNIP event on August 8, 2025, at 8:00 a.m. at the Public Works Department. • Pet adoption event on August 8, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Grocery Outlet.
• The League of California Cities Regional Dinner on August 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. • The Rose Festival and Parade will be on September 6, 2025. • The Wine and Roses dinner event will be September 5, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. • Save the date for the Kern Economic Development Annual Dinner on September 10, 2025.
• National Night Out event will be on Friday, October 10, 2025, from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. in Downtown.
14 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, August 5, 2025 • Love Your Community event by the New Generation Church on August 9, 2025, at 4:00 p.m., held at Barker Park.
• A joint meeting with the Wasco Recreation and Parks District Board and the Wasco City Council is scheduled on August 27, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in the city council chambers.
• A groundbreaking ceremony for unWired Broadband on September 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., located at the corner of Filburn Ave and Central Ave, for the fiber optic project.
• Chief of Police Fivecoat’s retirement dinner will be held on Friday, August 29, 2025, from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Wasco Recreation and Parks Hall , formerly known as the Veterans Hall.
• The Hawk and Beacon systems were approved. The bids are closed and ready to post.

17) REPORTS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL:

Council Member Reyna:
• Requests to ensure the complimentary transportation for the seniors to attend the Kern County Fair Senior Day.
• In preparation for the city council to meet with the Wasco Recreation and Parks District Board, requests staff to look into the probability of the City of Wasco using Measure X funds to provide recreational activities for seniors. • Participated in the Wasco Task Force Community Cleanup on July 26 th.
• There will be a Stuff the Bus event on August 8, 2025, starting at 8:00 a.m. for the elementary school district children, which Janet Grundt is hosting. • Requested staff to send thank-you notes to donors for the PAL Building donations.

Mayor Medina:
• Attended the Mayor's and City Managers' meeting in Arvin on July 31, 2025. • Requested if there is a count of ADUs and if the public is using the builder plans for ADUs.
• Wanted to ensure the city is targeting and at least looking at the high traffic areas where there are blind spots.

Mayor Medina announced the titles of the closed session items.

There were no public comments on the closed session items.

Mayor Medina adjourned into closed session at 6:55 p.m.

Mayor Medina adjourned out of closed session at 7:09 p.m.

18) CLOSED SESSION:
a. Closed Session Minutes for July 15, 2025.

b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Amerivet Contracting, a California Corporation

c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: LEO Towing
19) CLOSED SESSION ACTION:

City attorney Tom Schroeter reported out.

a. Closed Session Minutes for July 15, 2025.
15 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Agenda, August 5, 2025 Motion by Mayor Medina, seconded by Council Member Raya, to approve the closed session minutes by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ

b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Amerivet Contracting, a California Corporation No reportable action.

c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: LEO Towing
No reportable action.
20) ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Medina adjourned the meeting at 7:10 p.m.

____________________________________
Monica Flores, Deputy City Clerk

______________________________________
Valentin Medina, Mayor

16 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 2, 2025

MINUTES

WASCO CITY COUNCIL
and Successor Agency to the
Former Redevelopment Agency
Tuesday, September 2, 2025
Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers
746 8th Street, Wasco, CA 93280
REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 pm

1) CALL TO ORDER: Mayor
Mayor Medina called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

2) ROLL CALL: Mayor Medina, Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, Council Members: Martinez, Raya, Reyna

PRESENT: Mayor Medina, Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, Council Members: Raya, Reyna LATE: None
ABSENT: Council Member Martinez,

STAFF PRESENT: City Manager M. Scott Hurlbert, City Attorney Tom Schroeter, Assistant City Manager Maria Lara, City Clerk Maria O. Martinez, Public Works Director Luis Vill a, Community Development Director Keri Cobb, Human Resource Manager Nancy Vera, Assistant Chief of Police Alecio Mora, Chief of Police Fivecoat, Kern Fire Chief Joe Appleton,

3) FLAG SALUTE: by Mayor Medina

4) INVOCATION: by Mike Lynch, WPD Chaplain

5) APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, seconded by Mayor Medina, to approve the agenda as follows by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ

6) PRESENTATIONS:
a. Proclamation for Community Action Partnership of Kern Hunger Action Month Mayor Medina presented the proclamation to Susana Magana, Director of Health and Nutrition.

7) PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA:
• Public comment from Michael De La Torre
City Clerk Martinez mentioned that there were no email comments on this item or on any other items on the agenda.

17 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 2, 2025 8) SUCCESSOR AGENCY BUSINESS: None

9) WASCO PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY BUSINESS: None

10) NEW EMPLOYEE POLICE DEPARTMENT BADGE PINNING CEREMONY FOR:
a. Police Lieutenant Lloyd Galutira
Police Chief Fivecoat presented the newly appointed Lieutenant Lloyd Galutira, for the badge-pinning ceremony.

City Clerk Maria O. Martinez administered the oath of office to Lieutenant Lloyd Galutira.

b. Recognition Chief of Police Fivecoat
Mayor Medina presented the recognition to Chief of Police Fivecoat Mayor Medina recessed for a 5-minute break at 6:49 p.m.

Mayor Medina reconvened the meeting at 6:59 p.m.

11) PUBLIC SAFETY REPORTS
a. Kern County Fire Department (Appleton)
Chief Appleton presented an active fire report.
b. Wasco Police Department (Mora)
Chief Mora gave a presentation on recent crimes.

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS:
12) CONSENT CALENDAR:

b. Approval of City Council Minutes for:

1. August 19, 2025, Regular meeting

c. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or Designee to Execute a purchase order(s) in an amount not to exceed $70,000.00 with AV Water Technologies for the purchase of Residential and commercial water meters.

Reso#2025-4258-A

d. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; approve the acceptance of the Scofield Avenue Rehabilitation Project and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion.

Rec#2025-010

There was no conflict of interest for any of the Council Members present.

There were no public comments.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, Seconded by Mayor Medina, to approve the Consent Calendar by the following roll call vote:

18 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 2, 2025 AYES: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ

13) PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
14) DEFERRED BUSINESS:
a. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Discussion and Possible Minute Action to Appoint One Voting Delegate and Two Alternates for the League of California Cities 2025 Annual Conference and Expo to be held on October 8th -10th, 2025, in Long Beach, California.

Oral presentation by City Manager Scott Hurlbert

There was no public comment.

Motion by Mayor Medina, Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña to appoint Council Member Reyna as voting delegate and Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña and Council Member Martinez as alternates by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ

15) NEW BUSINESS:
a. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Authorize City Manager or designee to accept the Final Version of the Stormwater Master Plan. (Villa)
Reso#2025-4260

The Public Works Director introduced consultant John Kular, who joined the meeting via Zoom and delivered a PowerPoint presentation on the agenda item.

Public comments from Michael Delatorre.

Motion by Mayor Medina, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ

b. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Authorize City Manager or designee to accept the Final Version of the Wastewater Master Plan. (Villa)
Reso#2025-4261

19 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 2, 2025 Consultant John Kular, who joined the meeting via Zoom and delivered a PowerPoint presentation on the agenda item.

Public comments from Michael Delatorre.

Motion by Council Member Reyna, seconded by Mayor Medina, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ

c. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or Designee to Execute an Employment Agreement with Lloyd Galutira as Police Lieutenant.

Reso#2025-4262
Agmt#2025-029

Oral presentation by City Manager Hurlbert.

Public comments from Michael Delatorre.

Motion by Council Member Reyna, seconded by Mayor Medina, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ

16) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES:
a. Kern Economic Development Corporation (Medina)
Mayor Medi na reminded the Council of the Kern EDC's 37th Annual Dinner, scheduled for September 10, 2025.

b. Kern Council of Governments (Reyna)
c. Wasco Task Force (Saldaña and Medina)
17) REPORTS FROM THE CITY MANAGER:
• There is a need to convene the Legislative ad-hoc to discuss pending Legislation items.
• There was a recommendation to curtail the dial -a-ride services for the cooling center as it was not utilized; however, continue to stay with the commitment to open the cooling center when the forecast is above 105 degrees. Only in Extreme situations would there be a cooling center for the entire weekend. For now, we can operate the center on Saturdays but not on Sundays. - There was a consensus of the City Council.
20 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 2, 2025 • Reminder that the Community Breakfast at the State Pr ison is scheduled for 9 -3- 2025
• SNIP event is scheduled for 9-3-2025 at 9 am
• Ribbon-cutting for Linda y Fina scheduled for 9-26-2025 at 9 am • Groundbreaking event for Next Gen project 9-25-2025 at 9 am • National Night Out date has been set for Friday, October 10th, from 4 pm-9 pm • Community Clean Up scheduled October 18, 2025

18) REPORTS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL: None

Mayor Medina announced the titles of the closed session items.

There were no public comments
Mayor Medina adjourned into closed session at 8:12 p.m.

Mayor Medina adjourned out of closed session at 8:29 p.m.

19) CLOSED SESSION:

a. Closed Session Minutes for August 19, 2025.

b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Amerivet Contracting, a California Corporation

c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: LEO Towing

d. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: one potential case.
20) CLOSED SESSION ACTION:

City Attorney Tom Schroeter reported out.

a. Closed Session Minutes for August 19, 2025.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, seconded by Council member Raya, to approve the closed session minutes by the following roll call vote:

AYES: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, RAYA, REYNA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ

a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Amerivet Contracting, a California Corporation No reportable action
b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: LEO Towing
No reportable action

21 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 2, 2025 c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: one potential case.

No reportable action

21) ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Medina adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m.

____________________________________
Maria O. Martinez, City Clerk

______________________________________
Valentin Medina, Mayor

22 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 16, 2025

MINUTES

WASCO CITY COUNCIL
and Successor Agency to the
Former Redevelopment Agency
Tuesday, September 16, 2025
Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers
746 8th Street, Wasco, CA 93280
REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 pm

1) CALL TO ORDER: Mayor
Mayor Medina called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

2) ROLL CALL: Mayor Medina, Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, Council Members: Martinez, Raya, Reyna
PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, Council Members: Martinez, Raya ABSENT: Mayor Medina, Council Member Reyna

STAFF PRESENT: City Manager M. Scott Hurlbert, City Attorney Tom Schroeter, Assistant City Manager Maria Lara, City Clerk Maria O. Martinez, Deputy City Clerk Monica Flores, Community Development Director Keri Cobb, Accounting Manager Rocio Mosqueda, Police Lieutenant Lloyd Galutira

3) FLAG SALUTE: by Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña

4) INVOCATION: by Mike Lynch, WPD Chaplain

5) APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Raya, to approve the agenda as to form by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

6) PRESENTATIONS:
a. Recognition – Wasco Rose Festival Committee
Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña presented the recognition to the Wasco Rose Festival Committee.

7) PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA:

There were no public comments.

There are no email comments for this item or any other agenda items. 8) SUCCESSOR AGENCY BUSINESS:
a. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution of the Successor Agency to the Former Wasco 23 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 16, 2025 Redevelopment Agency Authorizing the Signing Authority for all Successor Agency Bank Accounts.

Reso#2025-031

Oral presentation by Accounting Manager Rocio Mosqueda.

There were no public comments.

Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Raya, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

9) WASCO PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY BUSINESS:
a. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Wasco Public Financing Authority to add Rocio Mosqueda as Authorizing Signer for all Wasco Public Financing Authority Bank Accounts.

Reso#2025-068

Oral presentation by Accounting Manager Rocio Mosqueda.

There were no public comments.

Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded b y Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

10) PUBLIC SAFETY REPORTS
a. Kern County Fire Department (Appleton)
No report – Chief Appleton absent.
b. Wasco Police Department (Mora)
Lieutenant Galutira gave a recent crime report.

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS:
11) CONSENT CALENDAR:

b. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or Designee to Enter into an Agreement with Duthie Power Services and Execute a Purchase Order Not 24 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 16, 2025 to Exceed $8 0,000.00 for the Purchase and Installation of a Replacement Generator for Sewer Lift Station No. 3.

Reso#2025-4263
Agmt#2025-030

c. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution to add Rocio Mosqueda as an Authorized Signer for all City Bank Accounts.

Reso#2025-4264

d. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or designee to Execute a Purchase Order not to exceed $13,835.00 with Vialytics America for street monitoring Hardware and Software services.

Reso#2025-4265

e. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt A Resolution Authorizing the Submission of an Application for the Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program Fiscal Year 2025 - 2026 and Related Authorizations from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle).

Reso#2025-4266

f. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Approval of Travel Expenses Exceeding $500.00 for the Administrative Manager and Dial -a-Ride Driver to attend the California Association for Coordinated Transportation CALACT Fall Conference on October 20 – 24, 2025, in Lake Tahoe, CA.

There was n o Conflict of Interest on the consent calendar for any of the Council members.

Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Raya, to approve the consent calendar by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

12) PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
13) DEFERRED BUSINESS: None

14) NEW BUSINESS:
a. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Approving the Amendment to the City’s Investment Policy Delegation of Authority. (Hurlbert)
Reso#2025-4267

Oral presentation by City Manager Hurlbert.
25 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 16, 2025 There were no public comments.

Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Raya, to adopt the resolution and to retroactively add the City Manager’s authority for the transaction that occurred by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

b. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Updating the Authoriz ed Signatories for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). (Hurlbert)
Reso#2025-4268
Oral presentation by City Manager Hurlbert.

There were no public comments.

Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Raya, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

c. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Updating the Authorized Signatories for the California Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (CA CLASS). (Hurlbert) Reso#2025-4269
Oral presentation by City Manager Hurlbert.

There were no public comments.

Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Raya, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

d. Council finds this action is not a “project” defined under section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Adopt a Resolution Updating the Authorized Signatories for U.S. Bank.

Reso#2025-4270
Oral presentation by City Manager Hurlbert.

There were no public comments.

26 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 16, 2025 Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Raya, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

15) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES:
a. Kern Economic Development Corporation (Medina)
No reports.
b. Kern Council of Governments (Reyna)
No reports.
c. Wasco Task Force (Saldaña and Medina)
Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña: Looking forward to collaborating in the citywide cleanup in October.

16) REPORTS FROM THE CITY MANAGER:

City Manager Hurlbert updated the city council on the following:
• Community Breakfast was held at the Wasco State Prison on September 3, 2025. • The Rose Festival update: 50 parade entries, with the PAL float winning third place. City vehicles were on display, along with city booths representing the Police Department, Animal Control, and the city as a whole . The Rose tour was manned and brought back this year using the Dial-A-Ride van. • Ribbon-cutting event for a local business , Linda y Fina Boutique, occurred on September 9, 2025.
• The Kern EDC Annual Dinner held on September 10, 2025, was well attended. • Dial A Ride will be transporting 24 seniors t o the Kern County Fair on September 19, 2025.
• Walmart remodel is having a grand reopening on September 26, 2025, and the city is waiting on the exact time.
• The fiber optic project, NextGen, will be holding its groundbreaking ceremony on September 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. on the corner of Central Avenue and Filburn Avenue.
• SNIP event will be held on October 1, 2025, at 8:00 a.m. in front of the Public Works Department.
• National Night Out event will be held on October 10, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
• The community clean-up event will be on October 18, from 9:00 a.m. to noon; the location will be given at a later time.
• Trunk or Treat is scheduled for October 30, 2025, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Barker Park.
• Anticipating a refuse schedule change; there ha ve been issues with the city trucks, the American Refuse trucks, and the type of carts that are being collected on different days of the week. There will be notifications to the citizens before that occurs.

27 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 16, 2025 17) REPORTS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL:

Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña:
• Attended the Wasco Rose Festival on September 7, 2025.

Council Member Martinez:
• Attended the Wasco Rose Festival on September 7, 2025.

Council Member Raya:
• Attended the Wasco Rose Festival on September 7, 2025.

Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña announced the closed session item titles.

There were no public comments on the closed session items.

Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña adjourned into closed session at 6:39 pm.

Mayor Pro Tem Saldaña adjourned out of closed session at 6:54 p.m.

18) CLOSED SESSION:

a. Closed Session Minutes for September 2, 2025.

b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Amerivet Contracting, a California Corporation

c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: LEO Towing

d. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: one potential case.
19) CLOSED SESSION ACTION:

City Attorney Tom Schroeter reported out.
a. Closed Session Minutes for September 2, 2025.

Motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Raya, to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:

AYES: SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MEDINA, REYNA

b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Amerivet Contracting, a California Corporation No reportable action.

c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: LEO Towing
No reportable action.

28 of 676
City of Wasco City Council Meeting Minutes, September 16, 2025 d. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: one potential case.

No reportable action.
20) ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Medina adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m.

____________________________________
Monica Flores, Deputy City Clerk

______________________________________
Valentin Medina, Mayor

29 of 676

STAFF REPORT
City of Wasco

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: M. Scott Hurlbert, City Manager
Alecio Mora, Chief of Police

DATE: October 7, 2025

SUBJECT: Approval of Travel and Training Expenses Exceeding $500.00 for Police Department Sworn Personnel to Attend the RIMSCON 28 Conference by Sun Ridge Systems from October 13-17, 2025, in Lake Tahoe. CA. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Approve travel and training expenses exceeding $500.00 for Police Department sworn personnel to attend the RIMSCON 28 Conference hosted by Sun Ridge Systems, including registration, lodging, and travel expenses from October 13-17, 2025, in Lake Tahoe. CA.; and

2) Find that this action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15378, no environmental review is required.

Environmental Review:

Staff has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposed activity consists of a governmental fiscal/administrative activity that does not result in a physical change in the environment; therefor e, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required.

Background:

The Wasco Police Department utilizes RIMS, a records and property management system provided by Sun Ridge Systems. Proper use of this system is critical for compliance with property and evidence handling requirements, which directly affect the department’s accountability, integrity, and public trust.

Discussion
The Police Department seeks approval for PD sworn personnel to attend the RIMSCON 28 Conference hosted by Sun Ridge Systems. The conference provides specialized training, 30 of 676
workshops, and hands -on learning sessions focused on property and evidence management, records, and system optimization.

As sworn personnel will be overseeing the department’s Property and Evidence Room, attendance at this conference is an essential investment to ensure best practices in evidence handling, accurate documentation, and compliance with state and legal mandates. The knowledge gained will directly support operational efficiency, reduce liability risks, and enhance public safety services.

The estimated cost for conference attendance, including registration, lodging, food per diems, and travel, is between $2,500 and $3,000, and will exceed the Expense and Use of Public Resources Policy limits established by City of Wasco Resolution No. 2006 -2327, which limit expenses to $500.00 per trip. As a result, the City Council must approve the travel request as the trip expenses will exceed $500.00.

Fiscal Impact:

The total cost of $2,500 -$3,000 will be covered by the Police Department’s training budget. No General Fund impact is anticipated beyond the allocated training funds.

Attachments:

1. RIMSCON 28 Conference Information

31 of 676

32 of 676
33 of 676

34 of 676
.

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: M. Scott Hurlbert, City Manager
Keri Cobb, Community Development Director
Tom Schroeter, City Attorney

DATE: October 7, 2025

SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or Designee to Execute the First Amendment to Agreement No. 2021-001 with Adams Ashby Group Inc., to P erform all C ompliance M onitoring as R equired by the HOME Program Loan made by the City in 2006 in an amount not to exceed $17,500 over a 5-year period.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute the first amendment to Agreement No. 2021-001 with Adams Ashby Group Inc. to perform all compliance monitoring as required by the HOME program loan made by the City in 2006 in an amount not to exceed $17,500 over a 5-year period; and

Environmental Review:

The staff has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA guidelines because the proposed activity consists of a governmental fiscal/administrative activity which does not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required.

Discussion:

In 2006, the City made a $950,000 HOME loan to assist the borrower in the construction of the Poso Place Seniors Apartments at 830 Almond Court . This funding requires annual monitoring and reporting to the State . Adams Ashby Group has conducted this annual monitoring and reporting since 2015, when the City dissolved its Housing Program Division.

STAFF REPORT
City of Wasco

35 of 676

Fiscal Impact:
$17,500 over a five -year period. Costs will be covered by the City’s HOME grant funds balance.

Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Agreement No. 2021-001

3. Amended Agreement

36 of 676
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF WASCO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 2021-001 WITH ADAMS ASHBY GROUP INC. TO PERFORM ALL COMPLIANCE MONITORING AS REQUIRED BY THE HOME PROGRAM LOAN MADE BY THE CITY IN 2006 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $17,500 OVER A 5-YEAR PERIOD

WHEREAS, the City wishes to execute an amendment to an agreement to conduct compliance monitoring for a HOME loan the City has with the Poso Place Senior’s apartments at 830 Almond Court; and

WHEREAS, the services to be purchased are described in the agreement as attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and

WHEREAS, said amendment will be made in the form and manner prescribed by the City of Wasco Municipal Code and the California Public Contract Code; and

WHEREAS, the Professional Services Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California; and

WHEREAS, the total cost associated with this agreement shall not exceed $17,500; and

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15378, no environmental review is required.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Wasco, as follows:

SECTION 1: Authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the first amendment to an agreement with Adams Ashby Group, Inc., as shown in Exhibit “A”.

- o0o-
37 of 676
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025 -_________was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Wasco at a regular meeting thereof held on October 7, 2025, by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS: MEDINA, SALDAÑA, MARTINEZ, RAYA, REYNA AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

__________________________________

VALENTIN MEDINA
MAYOR of the City of Wasco
Attest: _____________

__________________________
MARIA O. MARTINEZ, CMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Wasco

38 of 676
DocuSign Envelope 0: 451E5DBC- E45C41305- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF A" - K niyIEIN No. 2U1 001
t HIS AGREEMENT ( the " Agreement") made this 19t11day of January 2021, by and between the CITY OF WASCO (" City") and the ADAMS ASHBY GROUP, INC., a California Corporation ( the " Consultant").

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, City wishes to hire Consultant for compliance monitoring for a HOME Loan the city has with the Poso Place Senior' s apartments and as more particularly described in Exhibit " A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part thereof ( the " Services").

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth hereinafter, the parties agree as follows:

1. The parties incorporate the foregoing recitals as if fully set forth herein verbatim.

2. City hereby contracts with Consultant to perform the Services under the terms and conditions described hereinafter, and Consultant is agreeable thereto.

Consultant shall maintain its financial records as more particularly described in Exhibit " B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Consultant shall comply with the compliance provisions attached hereto as Exhibit " C" and by this reference made a part hereof.

3. Consultant shall perform the Services for a fee of $ 3, 000. 00 per year he " Fee"). City shall pay Consultant from written invoices submitted by Consultant annually which shall include a description of all Services performed and such additional information as required by the City Manager. The City Manager or his designated representative shall have the right of reasonable review of the invoices, and the Services described therein and, at the conclusion of the review, shall place the matter on the agenda for the next available City Council meeting for consideration. Upon approval of each invoice by the City Council, Consultant shall be paid in the regular cycle of payments made by the City for other bills and claims.

4. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date hereof to and through December 31, 2023. City mayterminate this Agreement at any time by giving Consultant thirty ( 30) days prior written notice, provided that in such event Consultant shall be entitled to payment for those Services rendered through the date of termination, provided satisfactory to City.
39 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 45lE5DBC- E45C4B05- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF

5. Consultant shall indemnify, defend (upon request by City) and hold harmless City, its officers, Councilpersons, employees, and agents from any and all claims, liabilities, expenses, and damages of any nature, including attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person, and for damage to any property, including consequential damages of any nature resulting therefrom, arising out of or in any way connected with any act or omission by or on behalf of Consultant.

6. Without limng Consultant' s obligations under Paragraph 5 of this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the life of this Agreement:
a) Comprehensive general liability insurance coverage, including premises – operations, products/ completed operations, broad form property damage, and blanket contractual liability, in an amount not less than $ 1 million per occurrence and automobile liability for owned, hired, and non -owned vehicles; b) Such workers compensation insurance as required by statute.

Consultant shall provide City with appropriate certificates of insurance and endorsements for all of the foregoing in which City, its officers, Councilpersons, Commissioners, employees, and agents are named as additional insureds and specifically designating all such insurance as " primary and providing further that same shall not be terminated nor coverage reduced without ten days prior written notice to City.

7. Consultant shall not assign its interest herein, or any part thereof, and any attempted assignment shall be void.

8. All reports, information, data, and exhibits drafted or provided by Consultant and all copyrights shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon demand without additional costs or expense to City.

9. All notices required to be given under this Agreement or by law shall be in writing and shall be deemed received by the party to whom directed if personally served or if mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested with the date of execution of the return receipt ( or refusal to sign) as the date of service or when sent by facsimile transmission or when sent by electronic mail (" email") or when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: If to City— City Manager, 746 8' Street, Wasco, California 93280; Fax – ( 661) 758- 7239; Email: daortiz a,ci13ofwasco. org or if to Consultant,-- Lorie Adams, 770 L Street, Suite 950, Sacramento California 95814; Fax – 916449- 3934 Email— ladams a,adamsashbygroup. com. Any party may change its address by giving notice to the other party in the manner herein described.

C) O

R' GINAL
40 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 451E5DBC- E45C- 4605- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF

10. Consultant shall not assign its interest herein, or any part thereof, and any attempted assignment shall be void.

11. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

12. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties with regard to the subject matter herein and supersedes all prior oral and written agreements and understandings between the parties with respect thereto.

13. This Agreement may not be altered, amended, or modified except by a writing executed by duly authorized representatives of all parties.

14. In the event any action or proceeding is instituted arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and actual costs.

15. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. A facsimile or electronic copy of this Agreement shall be as effective as the original for all purposes.

16. Waiver by a party of any provision of this Agreement shall not be considered a continuing waiver or a waiver of any other- provision, including the time for performance of any such provision.

17. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and the respective heirs, successors, and assigns.

18. If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall remain in full force and effect and not be affected, impaired, or invalidated thereby.

19. City and Consultant each acknowledge that each party and their respective legal counsel have reviewed this Agreement and agree that this Agreement is the product of negotiations between the parties. This Agreement shall be interpreted without reference to the rule of interpretation of documents that uncertainties or ambiguities therein shall be determined against the party so drafting the Agreement. 41 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 45lE5DBC- E45C4B05- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF IN WIT NESS WHEREW , the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first hereinabove written.
rDocuSigned by:

VAAA U OA/ " AAkhoA)
DANIEL ORTIZ HERNAIN- IJ City Manager
City of Wasco, California, " City"
ADAMS ASHBY GROUP, INC., a
n. Consultant"
U O
rJRl SINAL
42 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 45lE5DBC- E45C- 4805- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF EXHIBIT " A"
Scope of Services]

1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
Contractor shall perform all annual monitoring tasks as required by HOME - to ensure compliance with HOME requirements for Fiscal Year 2021, 2022 and 2023. Such tasks shall include:

1. Inspect required number of units as prescribed by HOME.

2. Review and audit tenant files as prescribed by HOME.

3. Ensure compliance with Regulatory Agreement.

4. Review the Annual Affirmative Marketing Analysis Report to ensure compliance with HOME requirements.

2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Ten days before the date by which those documents listed below are to be submitted to HOME, Contractor shall submit to City thefollowing completed documents:

1. Annual Monitoring Report.

2. Annual Project Compliance Report.

3. Form HUD - 52667, Allowance for Tenant Furnished Utilities and Other Services.

4. Copy of Summary Letter that had been sent to management.

5. Copy of Clearance Letter that had been sent to management.

6. Copy of Annual Affu-mative Marketing Analysis Report.

3. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Contractor shall be subject to monitoring by theCity, allowing full access to the information requested for monitoring purposes.

4. RECORDS RETENTION
Contractor shall prepare, maintain and/ or make available to the City upon request, all records and documentation pertaining to this Contract, including financial, statistical, property, recipientand servicerecordsand supportingdocumentationfor a periodof four 4) years from the date of final payment of this Contract. If at the end of the retention period, there is ongoing litigation or an outstanding audit involving the records, Contractor shall retain the records until resolution of litigation or audit. After the retention period has expired, Contractor assures that confidential records shall beshredded and disposed of appropriately.
43 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 451 E5DBC- E45C4B05- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF

5. GRIEVANCE
Contractor agrees to provide a procedure through which recipients of Contract services shall have the opportunity to grieve or complain regarding service.

U O

PIGINAL
44 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 451E5DBC- E45C- 41305- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF EJ I I11 D
Fiscal Provisions]

1. CONTRACTOR' S FINANCIAL RECOI
Contractor shall keep financial records for funds received hereunder, separate from any Aber funds administered by Contractor, and maintained in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Procedures and the Office of Management and Budget' s Cost Principles.

U 0
1RIGINAL
45 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 451E5DBC- E45C- 4B05- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF

EXIIIBIT
Compliance Provisions]

1. INFORMATION INTEGRITY AND SECURITY
A. Contractor ensures that personal, sensitive and confidential information is protected from inappropriate or unauthorized access or disclosure in accordance with Welfare and Institutions Code Section 10850, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIPAA), and all other applicable laws, regulations and policies.

B. Contractor shall immediately notify City of any known or suspected breach of personal, sensitive and confidential information related to Contractor' s work under this Contract.

2. NON- DISCRINIINATION
A. Contractor shall not unlawfully discriminate against any qualified worker or recipient of services because of race, religious creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status or age.
3 m DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY
M1AIERS
A. The Contractor certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its subcontractors:

1. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for disbarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;

2. Have not, within athree- year period preceding this Contract, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public transaction; violation of federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;

3. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in the preceding paragraph; and

4. Have not, within athree- year period preceding this Contract, had one or more public transactions terminated for cause or default.

OF
Vq
U 0
GRiGINAL
46 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 451 E5DBC- E45CAB05- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF B. Contractor shall report immediately to Director, in writing, any incidents of alleged fraud and/ or abuse by either Contractor or Contractor' s subcontractor. Contractor shall maintain any records, documents, or other evidence of fraud and abuse until otherwise notified by Director.

5. CHILD SUPPORT
Contractor shall comply with Public Contract Code Section 7110( a)3recognizing the importance of child and family support obligations and enforcement including, but not limited to, disclosure of information and compliance with earnings assignment orders as provided in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 5200) of Part 5 of Division 9 of the Family Code,

6. PAYROLL TA ilIES AI' 111 I ll±.DUCTIONS
Contractor shall promptly forward payroll taxes, insurances, and contributions to designated governmental agencies.

7. INDEMNIFICATI® N AND HOLD HAI I i 1LESS
Contractor shall indemnify and defend the City and its officers, employees, and agents against and hold them harmless from any and all claims losses, damages, and liability for damages, including attorney' s fees and other costs of defense incurred by City, whether for damage to or loss of property, or injury to or death of person, connected with Contractor' s operations hereunder or the performance of the work described herein, unless such damages, loss, injury or death is caused solely by the negligence of City.

8. STANDARD OF CARE
Contractor represents that it is specially txained, licensed, experienced and competent to perform all the services, responsibilities and duties specified herein and that such services, responsibilities and duties shall be performed, whether by Contractor or designated subcontractors, in a manner according to generally accepted practices.

9. INTEREST OF CONTRACTOR
Contractor assures that neither it nor its employees has any interest, and that it shall not acquire any interest in the future, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services hereunder.

10. IN SURANCE
A. Contractor shall procure and maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance for all of its employees.

B. Contractor shall procure and maintain Comprehensive Public Liability Insurance, 47 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 451E5DBC- E45CAB05- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF both bodily injury and property damage, in an amount of not less than one million dollars 1,000, 000) combined single limit coverage per occurrence, including but not limited to endorsements for the following coverage: personal injury, premises - operations, products and completed operations, blanket contractual, and independent contractor' s liability.

C. Contractor shall procure and maintain Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, both bodily injury and property damage, on owned, hired, leased and non - owned vehicles used in connection with Contractor' s business in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($ 1, 000, 000) combined single limit coverage per occurrence.

E. Contractor shall not commence work under this Contract until it has obtained all the insurance required hereinabove and submitted to CITY certificates of insurance naming the City of Wasco as additional insured. Contractor agrees to provide to CITY, at least 30 days prior to expiration date, a new certificate of insurance.

F. In case of any subcontract, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to provide all of the same coverage as detailed hereinabove. Subcontractors shall provide certificates of insurance naming the City of Wasco as additional insured and shall submit new certificates of insurance at least 30 days prior to expiration date. Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work until the required insurances have been obtained.

G. Any failure of Contractor to maintain the insurance required by this paragraph, or to comply with any of the requirements of this paragraph, shall constitute a material breach of the entire contract.

11. ATTORNEY' S FEES AND COSTS
If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Contract, the prevailing parry shall beentitled to reasonable attorney' s fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which such part may be entitled.

12. ASSIGNMENT
Contractor shall not assign any interest in this Contract and shall not transfer any interest in the same without the prior written consent of Director except that claims for money due or to become due Contractor from CITY under this Contract may be assigned by Contractor to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Written notice of any such transfer shall be furnished promptly to CITY. Any attempt at assignment of rights under this Contract except for those specifically consented to by both parties or as stated above shall be void.

13. IN DEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is specifically understood and agreed that in the making and performance of this Contract, Contractor is an independent contractor and is not an employee, agent or servant 48 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 451 E5DBC- E45C- 4B05- 800A- 45C7BAD825DF oI the City of Wasco.

14. OWNERSHIP
All non-proprietary reports, drawings, renderings, or other documents or materials prepared by Contractor hereunder are the property of CITY.

15. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Contract is held to be unenforceable, the remainder of this Contract shall be severable and not affected thereby.

U O
CI3INAL
49 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 60A9F416- F409- 47F5- B121- 44D4264EO7B9 RESOLUTION NO. 2021 - 3571

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WASCO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH ADAMS ASHBY GROUP INC. FOR

COMPLIANCE MONITORING FOR A HOME LOAN THE CITY HAS WITH THE POSO PLACE SENIOR' S APARTMENTS AT 830 ALMOND COURT.

WHEREAS, the City wishes to secure a consultant to conduct compliance monitoring for a HOME loan the City has with the Poso Place Senior' s apartments at 830 Almond Court, and
WHEREAS, the services to be purchased are described in the agreement attached in Attachment 1; and
WHEREAS, said purchase will be made in the form and manner prescribed by the City of Wasco Municipal Code and the California Public Contract Code; and, WHEREAS, the Professional Services Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, the total cost associated with this agreement shall not exceed 9, 000.

NOW THEREFOREBE ITRESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Wasco as follows:

SECTION 1: Au#horizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Ashby Adams Group, Inc, as shown in Attachment 1.
50 of 676
DocuSign Envelope ID: 60A9E416- F409- 47F5- B121- 44D4264EO7B9 OOO-
HEREBYCERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021 - 3571 was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Wasco at a regular meeting thereof held on January 19, 2021, by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES: GARCIA, REYNA, CORTEZ, MARTINEZ, PALLARES
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
Docu5lgned by:
0 ALEXANDRO GARCIA,
MAYOR of the City of Wasco
1/ 22/ 2021
Attest:

DocuSi ne

MARIA O, MARTINEZ
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Wasco
c
O Q

ORIGINAL
51 of 676
1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT (the "Amendment" ) made this ______ day of ____________, 2025, by and between the CITY OF WASCO ("City") and the ADAMS ASHBY GROUP , INC., a California Corporation (the "Consultant").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement dated January 19, 2021 (the “Agreement”) and the parties wish to amend the Agreement as more particularly described hereinafter.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby amend the Agree ment as follows:

1. The parties incorporate the foregoing recitals as if fully set forth herein verbatim.

2. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement unless otherwise described herein.

3. The parties agree that each party continued to operate under the Agreement notwithstanding the expiration of its term on December 31, 2023 as if the term had not expired and agree that the term was thereby extended to the date hereof (the “Term”). Each party agrees that all of its rights and obligations under the Agreement have been extended to the date hereof.

4. The parties hereby replace Paragraph 3 of the Agreement in its entirety with the following:

“Consultant shall perform the Services for a fee of $ 3,000.00 for 2025, $3,500 for 2026, $3,500 for 2027 , $3,500 for 2028, and $4,000 for 2029 (the “Fee”). City shall pay Consultant from written invoices submitted by Consultant annually which shall include a description of all Services performed and such additional information as required by the City Manager. The City Manager or his designated representative shall have the right of reasonable review of the invoices and the Services described therein and, at the conclusion of the review, shall place the matter on the agenda for 52 of 676
2 the next available City Council meeting for consideration. Upon approval of each invoice by the City Council, Consultant shall be paid in the regular cycle of payments made by the City for other bills and claims.”

5. The parties hereby amend Paragraph 4 of the Agreement to extend the Term to and through December 31, 2029.

6. The parties hereby amend the Agreement by removing Exhibit “C” from the Agreement and same shall no longer be incorporate herein nor be enforceable hereunder.

7. The parties hereby amend Section 9 of the Agreement by replacing [email protected] with [email protected].

8. Except as amended herein, the Agreement and each of its terms and conditions are hereby reaffirmed and shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of any inconsistency or ambiguity between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control.

9. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts. A facsimile or electronic copy of this fully executed Amendment shall be as effective as the original for all purposes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this A mendment on the date
first hereinabove written.

City of Wasco, California, "City"

_________________________________
VALENTIN MEDINA, Mayor,

ADAMS ASHBY GROUP, INC. , a
California Corporation, "Consultant"

By:_____________________________ _
LORIE ADAMS, President

53 of 676
.

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: M. Scott Hurlbert, City Manager
Luis Villa, Public Works Director

DATE: October 7, 2025

SUBJECT: Accept all Bids and Authorize the City Manager or D esignee to S ign and Execute an Agreement with Arsenal Well Drilling Inc. for the Drilling of Four Casing Hammer Test Water Wells Project as part of the City’s State Revolving Fund Water System Improvement and Treatment Projec t in an amount not to exceed $1.6 million.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1) Authorize the City Manager or designee to sign and execute an agreement with Arsenal Well Drilling Inc. for the Drilling of F our Casing Hammer Test Water Wells Project as part of the City’s State Revolving Fund Water System Improvement and Treatment Project in an amount not to exceed $1.6 million; and

2) Find that this action, based on the evidence in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the approval of the Water System Improvement and Treatment Project, will not have a significant environmental impact.

Environmental Review:

The staff has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Initial Study, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has determined that, based on the evidence in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, attachment to the staff report, the approval of the Water System Improvement and Treatment Project will not have a significant environmental impact.

This conclusion is based on compliance with the project’s design, mitigation measures, and CEQA requirements, which have been fully met.

Background:

As part of the ongoing City Water System Improvement and Treatment Proj ect No. 1510021-004C, a key component involves drilling and installing four new wells. The initial phase is to drill four test wells. These temporary wells are used to assess water quality and determine the optimal pumping zone. Ideally, the correct water quality zone is identified, helping us avoid filtration costs and operational expenses in the short term, while leaving

STAFF REPORT
City of Wasco

54 of 676
enough space on site if treatment expansion is ever required, similar to wells No. 13 and No. 14.

Discussion:

A request for proposal was issued on August 4, 2025, with the bid opening scheduled for September 10, 2025, for drilling four test wells at future well sites Nos. 15, 16, 17, and 18.

Three bids were received for this project, as shown in the bid results attached. Arsenal Drilling was determined to be the lowest responsive bidder while meeting all the necessary requirements the bid request specified.

Arenal's bid amount came in at $1,395,840.00. Staff is requesting the award to Arsenal in an amount not to exceed $1.6 million so that if any unforeseen changes occur as part of the project scope, staff can keep the project moving forward with City Manager approval of a change order, since the overall SRF grant project has an aggressive timeline to complete the whole project.

Fiscal Impact:

Funds were allocated as part of this year's CIP projects. 21023, 21024, 21027, and 21029 for the well drilling and site development phase of these four replacement wells.

Attachments:

1. Bid Results

2. Bid Recommendation

3. Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration

4. Resolution

5. Draft Agreement

55 of 676
Bid Package-Project Description:

City of Wasco
Bid Results
City of Wasco
City Clerk
Date:

Drilling of Four Hammer Test Water Wells Project - Project No. 2025-02 9/10/2025
9/10/2025 1:26 PM 2:10 p.m.

Bond
$2,066,400.00 Yes Yes
Arsenal Well Drilling Inc
Date
Opened
Yes
Time Bid Proposals $
Yes Yes
ABC Liovin Drilling
9/10/2025
Company AddendumReceived
Bid
9:22 AM
9/10/2025 2:05 p.m.
2:01 p.m.
$1,825,000.00 Yes
Time
Received
9:55 AM
Gregg Drilling LLC.
$1,395,840.00
56 of 676
City of Wasco
Maria O.

MartineCity
Clerk
57 of 676
1 DEE JASPAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
2730 UNICORN ROAD, BLDG A
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
PHONE (661) 393-4796
FAX (661) 393-4799

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

September 22, 2025

Scott Hurlbert, City Manager
c/o City of Wasco
746 8
th Street
Wasco, CA 93280

Re: Drilling of Four Casing Hammer Test Water Wells Project Bid Proposal Review and Recommendation

Mr. Hurlbert:

Bids were received for the above referenced project on September 10 th, 2025 at 2:00 pm
at the City office. The bid results are shown in Exhibits A and B attached hereto.

Arsenal Well Drilling, Inc. was the apparent low bidder in the amount of one million three hundred ninety-five thousand eight hundred forty dollars - $1,395,840.00. Arsenal Well Drilling, Inc. submitted the appropriate bid documents including:

• Bid Schedule
• List of Subcontractors
• Equal Employment Opportunity Certification
• Public Contract Code
• Non-Collusion Affidavit
• Bidders Bond (10%)
• Project References
• Addenda Acknowledgements

The bid proposal submitted by Arsenal Well Drilling, Inc. has been reviewed and it appears that they have submitted all the necessary bid information and that their bid is correct.

They are a Class “C57” Well Drilling Contractor located in Visalia, California. Their contractor’s license is active and in good standing. They have several years’ experience as a Well Drilling Contractor and are capable of constructing casing hammer test wells. They did not list any subcontractors for this project.

Project references were provided by Arsenal Well Drilling, Inc.

The bid was in accord with the Engineer’s Estimate. It is recommended that they be awarded the contract in the amount of $1,395,840.00 and that a pre-construction meeting be arranged upon award and execution of the contract documents.

58 of 676

Sincerely,

Curtis M. Skaggs, PE

59 of 676
3 EXHIBIT A

BID SUMMARY

60 of 676
DEE JASPAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
2730 Unicorn Road, BLDG A
Bakersfield, CA 93308
PHONE (661) 393-4796
FAX (661) 393-4799
Item Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization, Demobilization, and Clean Up 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $30,000 $30,000 77,700.00$ 77, 700.00$ 2 Drill Hole Using Casing Hammer Method 900 LF $125 $112,500 $162 $145,800 $150 $135,000 221.00$ 198,900.00$ 3 Install 8-5/8" Diameter Steel Casing 900 LF $125 $112,500 $45 $40,500 $150 $135,000 20.00$ 18,000.00$ 4 Airlift Water Samples at 15 Minutes Each 12 EA $400 $4,800 $650 $7,800 $1,500 $18,000 1,250.00$ 15,000.00$ 5 Install Submersible Pump and Pump for Two Hours Each 12 EA $4,000 $48,000 $3,780 $45,360 $2,500 $30,000 9,500.00$ 114,000.00$ 6 Drill Hole Below Casing and Perform E-Log for Open Hole 450 LF $100 $45,000 $147 $66,150 $185 $83,250 190.00$ 85,500.00$ 7 Test Hole Abandonment and Clean-Up 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 $28,350 $28,350 $25,000 $25,000 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ Bid Price per Test Well: 357,800$ 348,960$ 456,250$ 516,600$ Bid Price for Four Test Wells: 1,431,200$ 1,395,840.00$ 1,825,000.00$ 2, 066,400.00$ Subs: Subs: Subs:

None Pacific Surveys Well Log Pacific Surveys Well Log
Costera Waste Mngment Costera Waste Mngment
1 Engineer's Estimate Arsenal Well Drilling, Inc.
3 Gregg Drilling, LLC.
2 ABC Liovin
61 of 676

EXHIBIT B

BID DOCUMENTS

62 of 676
63 of 676
64 of 676
65 of 676
66 of 676
67 of 676
68 of 676
69 of 676
70 of 676
71 of 676
72 of 676
73 of 676
74 of 676
75 of 676
76 of 676
77 of 676
78 of 676

DRAFT INITIAL STUDY AND

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT

AND TREATMENT PROJECT

WASCO, CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2023

CALIFORNIA
air
79 of 676

DRAFT INITIAL STUDY AND

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT AND

TREATMENT PROJECT

Consultant:

5080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Contact: Jaymie Brauer, Principal Planner
Phone: (661) 616-2600

Project #220205

CALIFORNIA
80 of 676

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION
This is to advise that the City of Wasco Community Development Planning Division has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project identified below that is scheduled to be heard at the City of Wasco City Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 21, 2023 PLEASE BE ADVISED that the City of Wasco will consider adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration at the City Council meeting to be held on March 21, 2023. Presentations will be made at approximately 5:15 p.m. Action on items on the City Council agenda will occur after the presentations. The meeting will be held in the Wasco City Hall located at 746 8th Street, in Wasco, CA 93280.

Project Name
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project
Project Location
Various sites within Wasco city limits – see Figure 1-2.

Project Description
The Water System Improvement and Treatment Project (Project) includes drilling four new municipal water wells to replace existing water supply wells that exceed the State of California maximum contaminant level (MCL) threshold for 1,2,3 -trichloropropane (1,2,3- TCP) of 0.005-micrograms per liter (mg/L), and occasionally the threshold for nitrates of 10 mg/L for nitrate as nitrogen (N).

In addition, the City will install a new Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) treatment system at the existing Well No. 12 facil ity to remove 1,2,3 -TCP; rehabilitate the existing City Well No. 2; construct two 1.0 million gallon welded steel storage tanks and booster pump stations; and install an AMI system for remote read metering. All work will be done within the city limits of the City of Wasco. This work will involve drilling, constructing, and developing four new water supply wells and equipping each of those replacement wells with a pump, motor, discharge piping, electrical and controls, and site development. The work to install the GAC system at Well No. 12 will include furnishing and installing treatment vessels, piping, an d electrical and controls. The four existing well sites that are being replaced will be abandoned of all pump equipment, piping, electrical, and appurtenances. The wells will be abandoned by filling with concrete and performing all work in accordance with the County of Kern and the applicable State requirements. The property being used for new Well No. 17 will also be re-zoned from R-1-6 Low Density Residential (6,000 sq. ft. lot) to P-F (Public Facilities).

The document and documents referenced in the Ini tial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration are available for review at Wasco City Hall located at 746 8th Street, Wasco, CA 93280.
81 of 676

As mandated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the public review period for this document was 30 days (CEQA Section 15073[b]). The public review period began on Thursday January 26, 2023, and ended on February 27, 2023. For further information, please contact Jaymie Brauer at (661) 616-2600 or [email protected].

82 of 676
Lead Agency:

Project Description: (please use a separate page if necessary)

Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Designation:

Economic/Jobs Public Services/Facilities Traffic/Circulation O t h e r :

Drainage/Absorption Population/Housing Balance Toxic/Hazardous Cumulative Effects Coastal Zone Noise Solid Waste Land Use
Biological Resources Minerals Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading Growth Inducement Archeological/Historical Geologic/Seismic Sewer Capacity Wetland/Riparian Air Quality Forest Land/Fire Hazard Septic Systems Water Supply/Groundwater Agricultural Land Flood Plain/Flooding Schools/Universities Water Quality Aesthetic/Visual Fiscal Recreation/Parks Vegetation
Project Issues Discussed in Document:

Water Facilities:Type MGD O t h e r :

Recreational: Hazardous Waste:Type
Educational: W a s t e T r e a t m e n t : T y p e M G D Industrial: Sq.ft. Acres Employees P o w e r : T y p e M W Commercial:Sq.ft. Acres Employees Mining: Mineral O f f i c e : S q . f t . A c r e s E m p l o y e e s Transportation: Type Residential: Units Acres
Development Type:

Community Plan Site Plan Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) O t h e r :

General Plan Element Planned Unit Development Use Permit Coastal Permit General Plan Amendment Master Plan Prezone Redevelopment General Plan Update Specific Plan Rezone Annexation
Local Action Type:

Mit Neg Dec Other: FONSI
Neg Dec (Prior SCH No.) Draft EIS O t h e r :

Early Cons Supplement/Subsequent EIR EA Final Document
CEQA: NOP Draft EIR NEPA: NOI Other: Joint Document
Document Type:

A i r p o r t s : R a i l w a y s : S c h o o l s :

Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: Waterways:

A s s e s s o r ' s P a r c e l N o . : S e c t i o n : T w p . : R a n g e : B a s e :

Longitude/Latitude (degrees, minutes and seconds): ° ′ ″ N / 季季季季季 ° 季季季季季 ′ 季季季季季 ″ W Total Acres: 季季季季季 Cross Streets: Zip Code:

Project Location: County: City/Nearest Community:

City: Zip: County:

Mailing Address: P h o n e :

Contact Person:

Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal Mail to: State Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 For Hand Delivery/Street Address: 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 Project Title:

SCH #
Note: The State Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. If a SCH number already exists for a project (e.g. Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill in.

Revised 2010

Appendix C
Wasco Water System Improvement Project
City of Wasco Maria Lara
(661) 758-7250746 8th Street
Wasco 93280 Kern
Kern Wasco
multiple sites- see attached table 93280
multiple parcels (see Table 1 attached) multiple
43, 46 NA
Wasco-Kern County Airport Wasco Station Wasco High School, John L. Prueitt Elementary School, K Development Project
Public Water System Four new wells Improvements to existing public water well system.

See Attached
The Water System Improvement and Treatment Project (Project) includes drilling four new municipal water wells to replace existing water supply wells that exceed the California maximum contaminant level threshold for 1,2,3-trichloropropane (1,2,3-TCP) of 0.005-micrograms per liter (mg/L), and occasionally the threshold for nitrates of 10 mg/L for nitrate as nitrogen (N). The property being used for new Well No. 17 will also be re-zoned from R-1-6 Low Density Residential (6,000 sq. ft. lot) to P-F (Public Facilities). □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
□ Iii
□
□
□
□ Iii
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
□
□
□
Iii
□ Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
Iii
□
□
83 of 676
Revised 2010
Reviewing Agencies Checklist
Lead Agencies may recommend State Clearinghouse distribution by marking agencies below with and " X".

If you have already sent your document to the agency please denote that with an " S".

A i r R e s o u r c e s B o a r d O f f i c e o f H i s t o r i c P r e s e r v a t i o n Boating & Waterways, Department of Office of Public School Construction California Emergency Management Agency Parks & Recreation, Department of California Highway Patrol Pesticide Regulation, Department of Caltrans District # Public Utilities Commission Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Regional WQCB #
C a l t r a n sP l a n n i n g R e s o u r c e s A g e n c y Central Valley Flood Protection Board Resources Recycling and Recovery, Department of Coachella Valley Mtns. Conservancy S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Comm.

Coastal Commission San Gabriel & Lower L.A. Rivers & Mtns. Conservancy Colorado River Board San Joaquin River Conservancy Conservation, Department of Santa Monica Mtns. Conservancy Corrections, Department of State Lands Commission Delta Protection Commission SWRCB: Clean Water Grants E d u c a t i o n , D e p a r t m e n t o f S W R C B : W a t e r Q u a l i t y Energy Commission SWRCB: Water Rights
F i s h & G a m e R e g i o n # T a h o e R e g i o n a l P l a n n i n g A g e n c y Food & Agriculture, Department of Toxic Substances Control, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Department of Water Resources, Department of G e n e r a l Services, Department of
H e a l t h S e r v i c e s , D e p a r t m e n t o f O t h e r :

H o u s i n g & C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t O t h e r :

Native American Heritage Commission
Local Public Review Period (to be filled in by lead agency) S t a r t i n g D a t e E n d i n g D a t e
Lead Agency (Complete if applicable):

Consulting Firm: Applicant:

A d d r e s s : A d d r e s s :

City/State/Zip: City/State/Zip:

C o n t a c t : P h o n e :

P h o n e :

Signature of Lead Agency Representative: Date:

Authority cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 21161, Public Resources Code.

X 4
X
X 5f
X
X
X
X • San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
January 26, 2023 February 27, 2023
1/26/2023
84 of 676
ͳ

ሺ

ሻ
Ǥͳͷ

ͻ

͹ǡʹ͹ǡʹͷǡ
ǤǤǤƬ

Ǥͳ͸
ͳͶǡ
ʹ͹ǡʹͶǡǤǤǤƬ

Ǧ

Ǥͳ͹

ͳͶǡʹ͹ǡʹͶǡǤǤǤƬ
Ǧ

Ǥͳͺ

ʹǡʹ͹ǡʹͶǡ
ǤǤǤƬ

Ǧ

Ǥͳʹ

ͳǡ
ʹ͹ǡʹͶǡǤǤǤƬ
ͳǡʹǡ͵Ǧ

ʹͲǡͲͲͲ

Ǥʹ
Ͷ͸

Ͷǡʹ͹ǡ
ʹͶǡǤǤǤƬ
ͳ

Ǥ
ͳ͵

ͳͺǡ
ʹ͹ǡʹͷǡǤǤǤƬǤ

Ǧ

Ǧ

ሺ
ሻȂ

Ǧ

Ǥ

Ǥ͹ǡͺǡ
ͳͲǡͳͳ

Ǥ
Ǥ͹ȂͲǤͳͷ

Ǥͺ
ȂͲǤͳͷ

ǤͳͲȂͲǤʹͲ

ǤͳͳȂͲǤͳͲ

85 of 676

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page i

Table of Contents
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... iii Mitigated Negative Declaration ................................ ........................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

SECTION 1 - Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 1

1.1 - Overview ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 1

1.2 - California Environmental Quality Act ................................ ................................ ................................ . 1

1.3 - Impact Terminology ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 1

1.4 - Document Organization and Contents ................................ ................................ ................................ 2

1.5 - Incorporated by Reference ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 2 SECTION 2 - Project Description ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 2-1

2.1 - Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 2-1

2.2 - Project Location ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 2-1

2.3 - Project Environment ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 2-2

2.4 - Proposed Project ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 2-3 SECTION 3 - Initial Study ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 3-1

3.1 - Environmental Checklist ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 3-1

3.2 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ................................ ................................ ................ 3-2

3.3 - Determination ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 3-2

3.4 - Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ................................ ................................ ............................ 3-4

3.4.1 - Aesthetics ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 3-6

3.4.2 - Agriculture and Forestry Resources ................................ ................................ .............. 3-9

3.4.3 - Air Quality ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 3-13

3.4.4 - Biological Resources ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 3-19

3.4.5 - Cultural resources ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 3-33

3.4.6 - Energy ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 3-36

3.4.7 - Geology and Soils................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 3-38

3.4.8 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................ ................................ ............................. 3-45

3.4.9 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................ ................................ ............... 3-47

3.4.10 - Hydrology and Water Quality ................................ ................................ ..................... 3-53

3.4.11 - Land Use and Planning ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 3-59

3.4.12 - Mineral Resources ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 3-61

3.4.13 - Noise ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 3-63

3.4.14 - Population and Housing ................................ ................................ ................................ 3-67

3.4.15 - Public Services ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 3-69

3.4.16 - Recreation ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 3-72

3.4.17 - Transportation ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 3-74

3.4.18 - Tribal Cultural Resources ................................ ................................ ............................. 3-77 86 of 676

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page ii

3.4.19 - Utilities and Service Systems ................................ ................................ ...................... 3-79

3.4.20 - Wildfire ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 3-83

3.4.21 - Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................ ................................ ......... 3-86 SECTION 4 - List of Preparers ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 4-1 SECTION 5 - Bibliography ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 5-1 SECTION 6 - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ................................ ....................... 6-1 Appendices
Appendix A – Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL)
Appendix B – Cultural Resources
Appendix C – Feasibility Analysis Report

List of Figures
Figure 1-1 Regional Location ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 1-3 Figure 1-2 Project Sites ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 1-4

List of Tables
Table 1 Project Components ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 10 Table 2-1 Project Components ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 2-1 Table 2-2 Project Site and Surrounding Land Uses ................................ ................................ ............. 2-2 Table 3.4.3-1 Industrial Projects SPAL Reference Sizes ................................ ................................ . 3-14 Table 3.4.3-2 SJVAPCD Air Quality Thresholds of Significance – Criteria Pollutants .......... 3-15 Table 3.4.3-3 Construction Emissions ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 3-16 Table 3.4.3-4 Operational Emissions ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 3-16 Table 3.4.3-5 Potential Maximum Impacts Predicted by HARP ................................ ................... 3-18 Table 3.4.4-1 List of Plant and Wildlife Species Observed on the Biological Survey Area ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 3-22 Table 3.4.9-1 Schools in Project Vicinity ................................ ................................ ............................... 3-50 Table 3.4.13-1 Attenuation Distances from Project Noise Sources to 90 dBA Noise Contour ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 3-64 Table 3.4.13-2 Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment ................................ ...... 3-65

87 of 676

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page iii

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ALCUP Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
AMI Advanced Metering Infrastructure
APN Assessor’s Parcel Number
AWWA American Water Works Association
BMPs Best Management Practices
BSA biological survey area
CalGEM Geologic Energy Management Division
CARB California Air Resources Board
CDFG California Department of Fish and Game
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CH&SC California Health & Safety Code
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNPS California Native Plant Society
CRWQCB California Regional Water Quality Control Board
CWA Clean Water Act
DWR Department of Water Resources
EOP Emergency Operations Plan
EOP Emergency Operations Plan
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FEIR Final Environmental Impact Report
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GAC Granular Activated Carbon
gpm gallons per minute
GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan
HARP2 Hotspot Analysis and Reporting Program
HI hazard index
hp horsepower
IpaC Information for Planning and Consultation
IS Initial Study
KGSP Kern Groundwater Sustainability Plan
LRA Local Responsibility Area
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MCL maximum contaminant level
mg milligram
MJHMP Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MND Mitigated Negative Declaration
mph miles per hour
MRZs Mineral Resource Zones
88 of 676

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page iv
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NHD National Hydrography Database
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NSR new source review
NWI National Wetlands Inventory
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company
PLC Programmable Logic Controller
PLC Programmable Logic Controller
PPV peak particle velocity
PRC Public Resources Code
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
SIL significant impact levels
SJKF San Joaquin kit fox
SJVAB San Joaquin Valley Air Basin
SJVAPCD San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District SPAL Small Project Analysis Level
SPAL Small Project Analysis Level
SR State Route
SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
TACs toxic air contaminants
TCP trichloropropane
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
VMT vehicle miles traveled
WEAT Worker Environmental Awareness Training
μg/L micrograms per liter

89 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 1

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
As Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Wasco Community Development Planning Division has reviewed the Project described below to determine whether it could have a significant effect on the environment because of its development. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15382, “[s]ignificant effect on the environment” means a substantial, or potentially substant ial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the Project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance.

Project Name
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project
Project Location
Various sites within Wasco city limits – see Figure 1-2.

The four existing well sites that are being replaced will be abandoned of all pump equipment, piping, electrical, and appurtenances. The wells will be aban doned by filling with concrete and performing all work in accordance with the County of Kern and the applicable State requirements. See Table 1 for the location and description of each proposed Project component.

Project Components

NEW PRODUCTION WELLS
Well No. 15
Construction of Well No. 15 includes the following:

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 2
• The well site will be surfaced with ¾ inches of Class II aggregate base, with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building. The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate-controlled masonry block building. The well facility will also include a pad-mount emergency backup diesel generator. • The well discharge piping will be a 10-inch-diameter steel piping with valves, flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic pressure vessel. An 11- foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump.
• The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security.
• The well discharge piping will transition below ground and to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) piping will cross 9th Street and be installed east along 9 th Street to the point of connection with the existing City distribution system. The approximate length of the off -site 12 -inch water main is 225 feet. Site rainwater will drain to an on -site drainage system that terminates in an approximate 550,000-gallon retention basin. • The site drainage system will also be connected to the City drainage system by installing an 18-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) storm drain line west along 9th Street to the point of connection to the existing City storm drain system in H Street.

The approximate length of the off-site 18-inch storm drain line is 700 feet.

Well No. 16
Construction of Well No. 16 includes the following:
• A test well will initially be construct ed to an approximate depth of 900 feet in order to evaluate water quality in the underlying aquifer.
• A production well is planned to be drilled to an approximate depth of 1,300 feet and will be equipped with a vertical turbine pump and vertical hollow shaft electric motor and variable speed drive.
• The site will be fenced with a six-foot-tall masonry block wall with a chain-link drive and personnel gates.
• Off-site improvements will be made along Poso Drive, Martin Street, and Garden Street adjacent to the well site to install curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, and asphalt pavement.
• The well site will be graded to drain to an on-site retention basin. • The well site will be surfaced with ¾ inches of Class II aggregate base, with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building.
91 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 3
• The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and PLC and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate-controlled masonry block building.
• The well facility will also include a pad-mount emergency backup diesel generator. • The well discharge piping will be 10 -inch-diameter steel piping with valves, flow meter, and appurtenances, and will discharge into a 1 million gallon storage tank. • An 11-foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump to disinfect the raw water prior to storing it in the tank. The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security. The 1.0 MG storage tank will be constructed in accordance with American Water Works Association ( AWWA) D100 standards, be approximately 80 feet in diameter by 28 feet tall, and will be painted a neutral color to blend in with the surrounding area. The water from the storage tank will be conveyed to the City distribution system with a booster pump station. • The booster pump station will consist of three horizontal centrifugal booster pumps, each rated for 500 gallons per minute (gpm) and 40 horsepower (hp) with variable speed drives, steel piping, valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000 gallon hydropneumatic tank.
• The booster pump discharge piping will transition below ground to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system in Poso Drive. The approximate length of the off-site 12-inch water main is 125 feet.
• Site rainwater will drain to an on-site drainage system that terminates in an approximate 270,000-gallon retention basin. The site drainage system will also be connected to the City drainage system by installing an 18 -inch RCP storm drain line to connect to the existing City storm drain system in Poso Drive. The approximate length of the off-site 18-inch storm drain line is 50 feet.

Well No. 17
Construction of Well No. 17 includes the following:
• The well site will be graded to drain to an on-site retention basin. • A test well will initially be constructed to an approximate depth of 900 feet in order to evaluate water quality in the underlying aquifer.
• A production well is planned to be drilled to an approximate depth of 1,300 feet and will be equipped with a vertical turbine pump and vertical hollow shaft electric motor and variable speed drive.
• The site will be fenced with a 6-foot-tall masonry block wall with a chain-link drive and personnel gates. The well site will be surfaced with ¾ inches of Class II aggregate base, with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building.
92 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 4
• The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and PLC and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate-controlled masonry block building.
• The well facility will also include a pad -mount emergency backup diesel generator.

The well discharge piping will be 10 -inch-diameter steel piping w ith valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic pressure vessel. • An 11-foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump. The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security. • The well discharge piping will transition below ground and to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system on Filburn Street. The approximate length of the off-site 12-inch water main is 195 feet.
• The site drainage system will be connected to the City drainage system by installing approximately 555 feet of 18 -inch RCP storm drain line on -site to connect to the existing City storm drain system that underlies the well site property. • The property will be re -zoned from R-1-6 Low Density Residential (6,000 sq. ft. lot) to P-F (Public Facilities).

Well No. 18
Construction of Well No. 18 includes the following:
• The well site will be graded to drain to an on-site retention basin. • A test well will initially be constructed to an approximate depth of 900 feet in order to evaluate water quality in the underlying aquifer.
• A production well is planned to be drilled to an approximate depth of 1,300 feet and will be equipped with a vertical turbine pump and vertical hollow shaft electric motor and variable speed drive.
• The site will be fenced with a six-foot-tall masonry block wall with chain-link drive and personnel gates. The well site will be surfaced with ¾ inches of Class II aggregate base, with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building.
• The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and PLC and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate-controlled masonry block building.
• The well facility will also include a pad-mount emergency backup diesel generator. • The well discharge piping will be 10 -inch-diameter steel piping w ith valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic pressure vessel. An 11- foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump. The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security. • The well discharge piping will transition below ground and to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City 93 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 5
distribution system on Central Avenue and Margalo Street. The approximate length of the off-site 12-inch water main is 250 feet.
• The site drainage system will be connected to the City drainage system by installing an 18-inch RCP storm drain line to connect to the existing City storm drain system on Central Avenue and Margalo Street. The approximate length of the off -site 18-inch storm drain line is 1,500 feet.

The production well drilling phase will involve the drilling of four municipal water wells and is anti cipated to involve approximately 12 months. Each production well will involve approximately 60 working days to construct , with the well drilling activity taking place 24 hours per day, seven days per week for approximately 30 of those working days. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during construction activities:

• Well Drilling Rig
• Mud Pits
• Backhoe
• Loader
• Forklift

TEST WELLS
The Project includes the drilling of four new test water wells and is anticipated to involve approximately nine months. Each test well will take approximately 35 working days to construct, with drilling activities taking place between the hours of 6:30 a .m. to 4:30 p .m., Monday thru Friday. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during construction activities:
• Test Well Drilling Rig
• Backhoe
• Loader

The well equipping and site development phase will involve the equipping of four municipal water wells and is anticipated to involve approximately 24 months. However, equipment will not run continually or on a daily basis throughout this entire construction period. It is anticipated that the following heavy pieces of equipment would be used for approximately 200 working days during construction activities:
• Excavator
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Roller
94 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 6
• Generator
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

UPGRADES TO EXISTING WELLS
Well No. 12
The existing City Well No. 12 has 1,2,3 -TCP levels that exceed the State’s MCL. The City will install a GAC treatment to remove 1,2,3-TCP from the raw water. • The work will involve subgrade preparation and site earthwork, the construction of a reinforced concrete foundation for the treatment vessels, modifications to the existing well discharge piping, and installation of influent, effluent, and backwash steel piping, valves, flowmeters, and appurtenances.
• Four 10 -foot-diameter by 22 -foot tall GAC vessels will be installed on a concrete foundation. Each vessel will be filled with approximately 21,000 lbs of carbon for the removal of 1,2,3-TCP.
• Exhausted media will be transported off-site and regenerated at an approved facility. • A blow-down pipeline will be installed for flushing the well and backwashing when necessary. The blow-down pipeline is a 12-inch C900 PVC pipeline to be installed east along McCombs Avenue and south along Annin Avenue to an existing City retention basin.
• A 35-foot-long cased crossing, 24-inch-diameter steel casing pipe, will be installed for the blow-down line across Annin Avenue. The approximate length of the off -site blow-down pipeline is 3,500 feet.
• In addition, the treatment site will include an 8-feet by 14-feet wood building for a nitrate analyzer, an 11-foot by 13-foot concrete foundation and chain-link enclosure for a chlorine storage tank and chemical feed pump, electrical and control modifications, and ¾ inches of Class II aggregate base well site ground cover.

The installation of the Well No. 12 treatment system is anticipated to involve approximately 11 months. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during approximately 80 working days of construction activities:
• Excavator
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Boring Machine
• Roller
• Generator
95 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 7
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

Well No. 2
This well has been out of service and inoperable for several years. The City intends to rehabilitate this well and utilize it for potable water service. The work includes replacing the vertical turbine pump, vertical hollow shaft electric motor, well discharge piping, hydropneumatic tank, electrical, and controls.
• The well site will be re-graded and a six-foot-tall masonry block wall with chain-link drive and personnel gates will be installed.
• The well site will be surfaced with ¾ inches of Class II aggregate base, with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building.
• The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and PLC and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate-controlled masonry block building.
• The well facility will also include a pad -mount emergency backup diesel generator.

The well discharge piping will be 10 -inch-diameter steel piping with valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic pressure vessel. • An 11-foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump. The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security. • The well discharge piping will transition below ground and to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system on Leonard Avenue. The approximate length of the off -site 12- inch water main is 50 feet. The site drainage system will be connected to an on -site retention basin.

The rehabilitation of the existing Well No. 2 and the site development for that facility is anticipated to involve approximately 16 months. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during approximately 100 working days of construction activities:
• Excavator
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Roller
• Generator
96 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 8
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

Storage Tank and Booster Pump Station
A new storage tank and booster pumping station will be constructed. The 1.0 MG storage tank will be filled by a dedicated pipeline from the existing Well No. 13. • The 1.0 MG storage tank will be constructed in accordance with AWWA D100, be approximately 80 feet in diameter by 28 feet tall, and will be painted a neutral color to blend in with the surrounding area.
• The water from the storage tank will be conveyed to the City distribution system with a booster pump station.
• The booster pump station will consist of three horizontal centrifugal booster pumps, each rated for 500 gpm and 40 hp with variable speed drives, steel piping, valv es, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 6,000 gallon hydropneumatic tank. • The pump station will be constructed in a fashion to allow for future expansion to a 3,500 gpm total capacity.
• The booster pump discharge piping will transition below ground to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system on Wasco Avenue. The approximate length of the off-site 12- inch water main is 300 feet.

The construction of 1.0 MG storage tank s and booster pump stations is anticipated to be approximately 11 months. However, it is expected that the following pieces of equipment would be used during approximately 80 working days of construction activities:
• Excavator
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Roller
• Generator
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 9
to the City via a fixed network. The majority of the work will include the installation of software program upgrades to existing meter boxes. The Project will also include the installation of 5,173 new service meters and an AMI remote metering system. It is anticipated that this task will take approximately 55 months; approximately 500 new meters will be upgraded every three months.

City SCADA System
In addition, the existing City SCADA system will be modified and updated to include the above-noted water system improvements, including, but not limited to, the four new water well facilities, two new 1.0 MG storage tanks and booster pumping stations, the Well No. 12 1,2,3-TCP treatment, and the Well No. 2 facility.

The Project will include SCADA system upgrades with the addition of each of the above-noted Project components and is anticipated to involve approximately three months. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during construction activities:
• Generator
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

Wells to be Abandoned
Upon completion of the Project, the existing wells that are being replaced – Wells No. 7, No. 8, No. 10, and No. 11, will be abandoned in accordance with the Kern County and applicable State Standards.

The well abandonments are anticipated to involve approximately two months. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during construction activities:
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Generator
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

98 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 10
Table 1
Project Components
Well Component Locations Proposed Components Site (acres) No. 15 Northwest corner of J Street and 9th Street in
Section 7, T27S, R25E,
M.D.B.&M
New well Approximately one
acre
No. 16 Poso Drive and Martin Street in Section 14,
T27S, R24E, M.D.B.&M
New well and tank Approximately
two-acres
No. 17 Central Avenue and Filburn
Avenue in Section 14, T27S, R24E, M.D.B.&M
New well and tank Approximately one-
acre
No. 18 Northwest corner of Central Avenue and
Margalo Street in Section 2, T27S, R24E,
M.D.B.&M
New well Approximately
two-acres
No. 12 South side of McCombs Road in Section 1,
T27S, R24E, M.D.B.&M
Treatment to remove 1,2,3-TCP
from the raw water
Approximately
20,000 square feet
at existing well site
No. 2 North side of Highway 46 and west of Leonard
Avenue in Section 4, T27S,
R24E, M.D.B.&M
Rehabilitate existing well Approximately 1
acre to the existing
well site
Near No.
13 Booth property located south of Poso Drive
and east of Wasco Avenue in Section 18,
T27S, R25E, M.D.B.&M.

Construct storage tank and
booster pumping station
Approximately
two-acres
City-wide Advanced Metering
Infrastructure (AMI) system –
includes installation of a meter
interface unit at each service
meter and the wireless
transmission

City-wide Modify and update the existing
City SCADA system to include
above components.

No. 7, 8,
10, 11
Abandoned in accordance with
Kern County and applicable State
standards.

Well No. 7 – 0.15
acres

Well No. 8 – 0.15
acres

Well No. 10 – 0.20
acres

Well No. 11 – 0.10
acres

Construction of the Project is anticipated to span an approximate 4.5-year period. Several of the Project components will be constructed concurrently with other work. The document and documents referenced in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration are available for review at Wasco City Hall located at 746 8th Street, in Wasco, CA 93280.

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 11
Thursday, January 26, 2023, and ended on Monday, February 27 , 2023. For further information, please contact Jaymie Brauer at 661-616-2600 or [email protected].]

100 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 12
Mailing Address and Phone Number of Contact Person
City of Wasco Community Development Planning Division
764 E Street
Wasco, CA 93280
Contact Person: Maria Lara
Phone: (661) 758-7250
Findings
As Lead Agency, the City of Wasco Community Development Planning Division finds that the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Checklist (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G) or Initial Study (IS) (see Section 3 - Environmental Checklist) identified one or more potentially significant effects on the environment, but revisions to the Project have been made before the release of this Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or mitigation measures would be implemented that reduce all poten tially significant impacts less-than-significant levels. The Lead Agency further finds that there is no substan tial evidence that this Project would have a significant effect on the environment.

Mitigation Measures Included in the Project to Avoid Potentially Significant Effects
MM BIO-1 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, No. 18, and No. 19): Within 14 days prior to the start of Project ground -disturbing activities, a pre -construction survey with a 500 -foot buffer, where land access is permitted, shall be conducted by a qualified biologi st knowledgeable in the identification of special -status species such as San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF), burrowing owl (WEBO), etc. If dens/burrows/nests that could support any of these special-status species are discovered during the pre -construction survey, the avoidance buffers outlined below shall be established, and den or burrow monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012) and USFWS Standardized Reco mmendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance.

If any burrowing owl burrows are observed during the pre -construction survey, avoidance measures shall be consistent with those included in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012). If occupied burrowing owl burrows are observed outside of the breeding season (September 1 through January 31) and within 250 feet of proposed construction activities, a passive relocation effort may be i nstituted in accordance with the guidelines established by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2012). During the breeding season (February 1 through August 31), a 500-foot (minimum) buffer zone shall be maintained unless a qualified biologist verifies through noninvasive methods that either the birds have not begun egg laying and incubation or that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.
101 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 13
Den(s) or burrow(s) may be monitored using trail cameras or tracking medium such as diatomaceous earth. If no species are detected for a minimum of four consecutive days/nights, the den or burrow may be burrow -scoped and plugged with a filled sandbag under the direct supervision of a qualified and approved CDFW biologist. All tunnels must be examined for animal presence before plugging with a sandbag to ensure no burrowing owls, kit foxes, or other animals are hiding inside.

No work shall occur within these buffers unless the biologist approves and monitors the activity. A copy of the pre-construction survey report shall be submitted to the Lead Agency as evidence of compliance.

SJKF
Potential or Atypical den – 50 feet
Known den – 100 feet
Natal Den –Contact CDFW for consultation
MM BIO -2: The following avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented during all phases of the Project to reduce the potential for impact from the Project. They are modified from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered SJKF Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS, 2011, Appendix F).
a. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in secur ely closed containers. All food -related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in securely closed containers and removed at least once a week from the construction or Project site. b. Construction-related vehicle tra ffic shall be restricted to established roads and predetermined ingress and egress corridors, staging, and parking areas. Vehicle speeds shall not exceed 20 miles per hour (mph) within the Project site. c. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit fox or othe r animals during construction, the contractor shall cover all excavated, steep -walled holes or trenches more than two feet deep at the close of each workday with plywood or similar materials. If holes or trenches cannot be covered, one or more escape ramps constructed of earthen fill or wooden planks shall be installed in the trench. Before such holes or trenches are filled, the contractor shall thoroughly inspect them for entrapped animals. All construction-related pipes, culverts, or similar structures wi th a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored on the Project site shall be thoroughly inspected for wildlife before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If at any time an entrapped or injured kit fox is discovered, work in the immediate area shall be temporarily halted, and USFWS and CDFW shall be consulted. d. Kit foxes are attracted to den-like structures such as pipes and may enter stored pipes and become trapped or injured. All construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored at a construction site for one or more overnight periods shall be thoroughly inspected for kit foxes before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If a kit fox is 102 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 14
discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved until the USFWS and CDFW have been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved only once to remove it from the path of construction activity until the fox has escaped.
e. No pets, such as dogs or cats, shall be permitted on the Project sites to prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes, or destruction of dens. f. Use of anti-coagulant rodenticides and herbicides in Project sites shall be restricted.

This is necessary to prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit foxes and the depletion of prey populations on which they depend. All uses of such compounds shall observe labels and other restrictions mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and other State and federal legislation, as well as additional Project-related restrictions deemed necessary by the USFWS and CDFW. If rodent control must be conducted, zinc phosphide shall be used because of the proven lower risk to kit foxes.
g. A representative shall be appointed by the Project proponent who will be the contact source for any employee or contractor who might inadvertently kill or injure a kit fox or who f inds a dead, injured , or entrapped kit fox. The representative shall be identified during the employee education program , and their name and telephone number shall be provided to the USFWS.
h. The Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office of USFWS and CDFW shall be notified in writing within three working days of the accidental death or injury to a SJKF during Project-related activities. Notification must include the date, time, and location of the incident or of the finding of a dead or injured animal and any other pertinent information. The USFWS contact is the Chief of the Division of Endangered Species at the addresses and telephone numbers below. The CDFW contact can be reached at (559) 243-4014 and [email protected].
i. All sightings of the SJKF shall be reported to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). A copy of the reporting form and a topographic map clearly marked with the location of where the kit fox was observed shall also be provided to the Service at the address below.
j. Any Project-related information required by the USFWS or questions concerning the above conditions or their implementation may be directed in writing to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at Endangered Species Division, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W 2605, Sacramento, California 9 5825-1846, phone: (916) 414 -6620 or (916) 414 - 6600.
k. New sightings of SJKF should be reported to the CNDDB.

MM BIO-3 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, No. 18, and No. 19) : If all Project activities are completed outside of the Swainson’s hawk nesting season (February 15 through August 31), this mitigation measure does not apply.

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 15
or substrates must be monitored for activity on a routine and repeating basis throughout the breeding season or until Swainson’s hawks or other raptor species are verified to be using them. The protocol recommends that the following visits be made to each nest or nesting site: one visit from January 1 –March 20 to identify potential nest sit es, three visits from March 20–April 5, three visits from April 5–April 20, and three visits during June 10–July 30.

A fewer number of visits may be permissible if deemed adequate by the City after consultation with a qualified biologist. To meet the minim um level of protection for the species, surveys shall be completed for at least two survey periods immediately prior to Project-related ground -disturbance activities. If Swainson's hawks are not found to nest within the BSA, then no further action is warranted.

MM BIO-4 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, No. 18, and No. 19) : If an active Swainson’s hawk nest is discovered at any time within 0.5 mile s of active construction, a qualified biologist shall complete an assessment of the potential for current construction activities to impact the nest. The assessment will consider the type of construction activities, the location of construction relative to the nest, the visibility of construction activities from the nest location, and other existing disturbances in the area that are not related to the construction activities of this Project. Based on this assessment, the biologist shall determine if construction activities can proceed and the level of nest monitoring required. Construction activities shall not occur within 500 feet of an active nest but depending upon conditions at the site , this distance may be reduced. Full -time monitoring to evaluate the effects of construction activities on nesting Swainson’s hawks may be required. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work if it is determined that Project construction is disturbing the nest. These buffers may need to increase depending on the sensitivity of the nest location, the sensitivity of the nesting Swainson’s hawk to disturbances, and the discretion of the qualified biologist.

MM BIO-5 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, No. 18, and No. 19) : If construction is planned outside the nesting period for raptors (other than burrowing owl) and migratory birds (February 1 to August 15), no mitigation shall be required. If construction is planned during the nesting season for migratory birds and raptors, a pre -construction survey to identify active bird nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to evaluate the site and a 250 - foot buffer for migratory birds and a 500 -foot buffer for raptors. If nesting birds are identified during the survey, active raptor nests shall be avoided by 500 feet , and all other migratory bird nests shall be avoided by 250 feet. Avoidance buffers may be reduced if a qualified on-site monitor determines that encroachment into the buffer area is not affecting nest building, the rearing of young, or otherwise affecting the breeding behaviors of the resident birds. Because nesting birds can establish new nests or produ ce a second or even third clutch at any time during the nesting season, nesting bird surveys shall be repeated every 30 days as construction activities are occurring throughout the nesting season.

No construction or earth-moving activity shall occur within a non-disturbance buffer until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the young have fledged (le ft the nest) and have attained sufficient flight skills to avoid Project construction areas. Once the migratory birds or raptors have completed nesting , and the young have fledged, disturbance buffers will no longer be needed and may be removed, and monitoring may cease. 104 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 16
MM BIO-6 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, No. 18, and No. 19) : Prior to the initiation of construction activities, all construction personnel shall attend a Worker Environmental Awareness Training program developed and presented by a qualified biologist. It shall include the components described below:
a. Information on the life history and identification of special -status species that may occur or that may be affected by Project activities. The program shall also discuss the legal protection status of each such species, the definition of “take” under the FESA and CESA, measures the Project proponent/operator shall implement to prot ect the species, reporting requirements, specific measures for workers to avoid take of special-status plant and wildlife species, and penalties for violation of the requirements outlined in the CEQA mitigation measures and agency permit requirements.

MM CUL-1: If prehistoric or historic -era cultural materials are encountered during construction activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the find and make recommendations. Cultural resource materials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire -affected rock , as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural remnants. If the qualified arch aeologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation.

These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation. Implementation of the mitigation measure below would ensure that the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

MM CUL-2: If human remains are discover ed during construction or operational activities, further excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The specific protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Na tive American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code (Chapter 1492, Statutes of 1982, Senate Bill 297), and Senate Bill 447 (Chapter 44, Statutes of 1987), shall be followed. Section 7050.5(c) shall guide the potential Native American involvement, in the event of a discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner.

MM GEO -1: If any paleontological resources are encountered during ground -disturbance activities, all work within 25 feet of the find shall halt until a qualified paleontologist , as defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources (2010), can evaluate the find and make recommendations regarding treatment. Paleontological resource materials may include resources such as fossils, plant impressions, or animal tracks preserved in rock. The qualified paleontologist shall contact the Natural Histo ry Museum of Los Angeles County or another appropriate facility regarding any discoveries of paleontological resources. 105 of 676
Mitigated Negative Declaration

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 17
If the qualified paleontologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant paleontological resource, additional investigations and fossil recovery may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation. If avoidance is not feasible, the paleontological resources shall be evaluated for their significance. If the resources are not significant, avoidance is not necessary. If the resources are significant, they shall be avoided to ensure no adverse effects, or such effects must be mitigated. Construction in that area shall not resume until the resource-appropriate measures are recommended, or the materia ls are determined to be less than significant. If the resource is significant and fossil recovery is the identified form of treatment, then the fossil shall be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution. Copies of all correspondence an d reports shall be submitted to the Lead Agency.

MM NSE-1: During construction, the contractor shall implement the following measures:
a. All stationary construction equipment on the Project site shall be located so that noise-emitting objects or equipment fa ce away from any potential sensitive receptors.
b. The construction contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is equipped with manufacturer-approved mufflers and baffles. During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers.
c. Construction activities shall take place during daylight hours, when feasible.

106 of 676
Introduction

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 1-1
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION

1.1 - Overview
The City of Wasco Community Development Planning Division (City) is proposing new water wells and water system improvements throughout the City (Project) in Kern County in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Figure 1-1 is a map of the regional location , and Figure 1-2 shows the Project location.

1.2 - California Environmental Quality Act
The City is the Lead Agency for this Project pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines (Public Resources Code Section 15000 et seq.). The Environmental Checklist (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G) or Initial Study (IS) (see Section 3 – Initial Study ) provides analysis that examines the potential en vironmental effects of the construction and operation of the Project. Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines requires the Lead Agency to prepare an IS to determine whether a discretionary Project will have a significant effect on the environment.

A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is appropriate when an IS has been prepared , and a determination can be made that no significant environmental effects will occur because revisions to the Project have been made or mitigation measures will be implemented that reduce all potentially significant impacts to less -than-significant levels. The content of a n MND is the same as a Negative Declaration, with the addition of identified mitigation measures and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) (see Section 6 – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program).

Based on the IS, the Lead Agency has determined that the environmental review for the proposed application can be completed with an MND.

1.3 - Impact Terminology
The following terminology is used to describe the level of significance of impacts. • A finding of “no impact” is appropriate if the analysis concludes that the Project would not affect a topic area in any way.
• An impact is considered “less than significant” if the analysis concludes that it would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment and requires no mitigation. • An impact is considered “less than significant with mitigation incorporated” if the analysis concludes that it would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of environmental commitments that have been agreed to by the applicant.
• An impact is considered “potentially significant” if the analysis concludes that it could have a substantial adverse effect on the environment.
107 of 676
Introduction

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 1-2

1.4 - Document Organization and Contents
The content and format of this IS/MND is designed to meet the require ments of CEQA. The report contains the following sections:
• Section 1 – Introduction: This section provides an overview of CEQA requirements, intended uses of the IS/MND, document organization, and a list of regulations that have been incorporated by reference.
• Section 2– Project Description: This section describes the Project and provides data on the site’s location.
• Section 3 – Initial Study : This section contains the evaluation of 21 different environmental resource factors contained in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. Each environmental resource factor is analyzed to determine whethe r the proposed Project would have an impact. One of four findings is made which include: no impact, less-than-significant impact, less than significant with mitigation, or significant and unavoidable. If the evaluation results in a finding of significant a nd unavoidable for any of the 21 environmental resource factors, then an Environmental Impact Report will be required.
• Section 4 – List of Preparers: This section identifies the individuals who prepared the IS/MND.
• Section 5 – Bibliography: This section contains a full list of references that were used in the preparation of this IS/MND.
• Section 6 – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: This section contains the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

1.5 - Incorporated by Reference
The following docum ents and/or regulations are incorporated into this IS/MND by reference:
• California Department of Water Resources- Water Well Standards • City of Wasco General Plan 2040
• City of Wasco General Plan FEIR
• Wasco Municipal Code - Title 17 Zoning Ordinance
• Kern County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
• Kern County Emergency Operations Plan

108 of 676
Introduction

Water System Improvement and Treatment Project January 2023 City of Wasco Page 1-3

Figure 1-1
Regional Location
D Project Location
0 Miles 100 0
Miles 7_5
N l1aM
For~Baw
nsen do
109 of 676
Introduction

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 1-4

Figure 1-2
Project Sites
WELL
18 ®
' --• =c■::.=-
••
---
I
f
®
t
f
t
I
I
I
-~ .... -
--... -
t
I
---
......
0 t I
ii
f ..
ii .,
--
71111 71h91
i:.·
11181
Ill .,
t II
I .. _.,,
.....
,_,,,.,.

II
"'
) .

CITY OF WASCO WATER

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT
19& ~-- I
Le,gend
0 Active
@ Proposed ProjKt Well
Facility
0 Well to be Abandoned
0 Exirtin1 Wl!!ll to be
Reh1bil1tated
- Proposed Watar Pi paline
- Proposed Stom P1pal1n•
•• • • EJlistin1 water Lines
••••Existin1 Stom Lines
ii ........ 1.0MG_ T_,k ,_._._
Ill Fulllre 1.0 MG Slorage Tri &
Boolt.r Pump Station
110 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-1 SECTION 2 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 - Introduction
The City of Wasco Community Development Planning Division (City, as Lead Agency ) proposes the Water System Improvement and Treatment Project (Project) within the City of Wasco, in the northwest portion of K ern County, California. Figure 1-1 shows the Project’s regional location and Figure 1-2 shows the locations of the Project components.

2.2 - Project Location
The Project site is located throughout the City of Wasco. The Project component’s locations are listed in Table 2-1 below.

Table 2-1
Project Components
Well Component Locations Proposed Project Site (acres)
No. 15 Northwest corner of J Street and 9th
Street in Section 7, T27S, R25E,
M.D.B.&M
New well Approximately two-
acres
No. 16 Poso Drive and Martin Street in Section
14, T27S, R24E, M.D.B.&M
New well and tank Approximately two-
acres
No. 17 Central Avenue and Filburn Avenue in
Section 14, T27S, R24E, M.D.B.&M
New well and tank
Rezone from R-1-6 to P-F
Approximately one-
acre
No. 18 Northwest corner of Central Avenue and
Margalo Street in Section 2, T27S, R24E,
M.D.B.&M
New well Approximately two-
acres
No. 12 South side of McCombs Road in Section
1, T27S, R24E, M.D.B.&M
Treatment to remove 1,2,3 -
TCP from the raw water
Approximately
20,000 square feet of
work to existing well
site
No. 2

North side of Highway 46 and west of
Leonard Avenue in Section 4, T27S,
R24E, M.D.B.&M
Rehabilitate existing well Approximately 1-
acre to existing well
site
Near No.
13 Booth property located south of
Poso Drive and east of Wasco
Avenue in Section 18, T27S, R25E,
M.D.B.&M.

Construct storage tank and
booster pumping station
Approximately two-
acres
City-wide Advanced Metering
Infrastructure (AMI)
system – includes
installation of a meter
interface unit at each
service meter and the
wireless transmission.

City-wide Modify and update the
existing City SCADA
system to include
above components.

111 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-2 Well Component Locations Proposed Project Site (acres)
No. 7, 8,
10, 11
Destroy in accordance with
Kern County and applicable
State standards.

Well No. 7 – 0.15
acres

Well No. 8 – 0.15
acres

Well No. 10 – 0.20
acres

Well No. 11 – 0.10
acres

2.3 - Project Environment
The various Project components are located in different areas within the City . Table 2 -2 outlines each component, the Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN), current City General Plan map code designations/zone classifications, and surrounding land uses.

Table 2-2
Project Site and Surrounding Land Uses
Project Component APN Zoning/Land Use Surrounding Zoning/ Land Use Proposed Well #15 030-030-01 Heavy Industrial
N: Heavy Industrial
E: Heavy Industrial
S: Heavy Industrial
W: Heavy Industrial
Proposed Tank & Well
#16 490-010-04 R-2 Medium Density
Residential
N: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
E: R-2 Medium Density
Residential
S: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
W: County Land
Proposed Well #17 490-020-04
R-1-6 Low Density
Residential (6,000 sq. ft.
lot)
N: Open Space
E: R-1-6 Low Density Residential
6,000 sq. ft. lot
S: County Land
W: County Land
Proposed Well #18 487-010-11
R-1-6 Low Density
Residential (6,000 sq. ft.
lot)
N: County Land
E: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
S: R-3 High Density Residential
and C-R Community Retail
Commercial
W: County Land
Proposed Tank 072-240-07 Heavy Industrial
N: Heavy Industrial
E: Heavy Industrial
S: Heavy Industrial
W: Service Commercial
Proposed Treatment TCP 487-010-59 Public Facilities N: County Land 112 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-3 Project Component APN Zoning/Land Use Surrounding Zoning/ Land Use E: Rural Residential
S: Rural Residential
W: County Land
Well Rehabilitation (#2) 487-050-24 Community Retail
Commercial
N: Exclusive Agriculture
E: Public Facilities
S: Public Facilities
W: Exclusive Agriculture
Well #7 (to be
abandoned) 029-070-27
R-1-6 Low Density
Residential (6,000 sq. ft.
lot)
N: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
E: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
S: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
W: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
Well #8 (to be
abandoned) 488-020-19 R-2 Medium Density
Residential
N: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
E: R-2 Medium Density
Residential
S: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
W: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
Well #10 (to be
abandoned) 487-221-02
R-1-6 Low Density
Residential (6,000 sq. ft.
lot)
N: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
E: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
S: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
W: Public Facilities
Well #11 (to be
abandoned) 029-391-05
R-1-6 Low Density
Residential (6,000 sq. ft.
lot)
N: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
E: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot
S: R-2 Medium Density
Residential
W: R-1-6 Low Density Residential,
6,000 sq. ft. lot

2.4 - Proposed Project
The Water System Improvement and Treatment Project (Project) includes drilling four new municipal water wells to replace existing water supply wells that exceed the State of California maximum contaminant level (MCL) threshold for 1,2,3 -trichloropropane (1,2,3- TCP) of 0.005-micrograms per liter (mg/L), and occasionally the threshold for nitrates of 10 mg/L for nitrate as nitrogen (N).

The four existing well sites that are being replaced will be abandoned of all pump equipment, piping, electrical, and appur tenances. The wells will be abandoned by filling with concrete and performing all work in accordance with the County of Kern and the applicable State 113 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-4 requirements. See Table 1 for the location and description of each proposed Project component.

Project Components

NEW PRODUCTION WELLS
Well No. 15
Construction of Well No. 15 includes the following:

• A test well will initially be constructed to an approximate depth of 900 feet in order to evaluate water quality in the underlying aquifer.
• A production well is planned to be drilled to an approximate depth of 1,300 feet and will be equipped with a vertical turbine pump and vertical hollow shaft electric motor and variable speed drive. The site will be fenced with a six-foot-tall masonry block wall with a chain-link drive and personnel gates.
• The well site will be surfaced with ¾” Class II aggregate base , with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building. The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate-controlled masonry block building. The well facility will also include a pad-mount emergency backup diesel generator.
• The well discharge piping will be a 10-inch-diameter steel piping with valves, flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000 -gallon hydropneumatic pressure v essel. An 11- foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump.
• The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security.
• The well discharge piping will transition below ground and to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) piping will cross 9th Street and be installed east along 9 th Street to the point of connection with the existing City distribution system. The approximate length of the off -site 12 -inch water main is 225 feet. Site rainwater will drain to an on -site drainage system that terminates in an approximate 550,000-gallon retention basin. • The site drainage system will also be connected to the City drainage system by installing an 18-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) storm drain line west along 9th Street to the point of connection to the existing City storm drain system in H Street.

The approximate length of the off-site 18-inch storm drain line is 700 feet.

Well No. 16
Construction of Well No. 16 includes the following:
114 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-5 • A test well will initially be constructed to an approximate depth of 900 feet in order to evaluate water quality in the underlying aquifer.
• A production well is planned to be drilled to an approximate depth of 1,300 feet and will be equipped with a vertical turbine pump and vertical hollow shaft electric motor and variable speed drive.
• The site will be fenced with a six-foot-tall masonry block wall with a chain-link drive and personnel gates.
• Off-site improvements will be made along Poso Drive, Martin Street, and Garden Street adjacent to the well site to install curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, and asphalt pavement.
• The well site will be graded to drain to an on-site retention basin. • The well site will be surfaced with ¾ inches of Class II aggregate base, with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building.
• The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and PLC and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate-controlled masonry block building.
• The well facility will also include a pad-mount emergency backup diesel generator. • The well discharge piping will be 10 -inch-diameter steel piping with valves, flow meter, and appurtenances, and will discharge into a 1.0 million gallons storage tank. • An 11-foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump to disinfect the raw water prior to storing it in the tank. The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security. The 1.0 MG storage tank will be constructed in accordance with American Water Works Association ( AWWA) D100 standards, be approximately 80 feet in diameter by 28 feet tall, and will be painted a neutral color to blend in with the surrounding area. The water from the storage tank will be conveyed to the City distribution system with a booster pump station. • The booster pump station will consist of three horizontal centrifugal booster pumps, each rated for 500 gallons per minute (gpm) and 40 horsepower (hp) with variable speed drives, steel piping, valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000 gpm hydropneumatic tank.
• The booster pump discharge piping will transition below ground to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system in Poso Drive. The approximate length of the off-site 12-inch water main is 125 feet.
• Site rainwater will drain to an on-site drainage system that terminates in an approximate 270,000-gallon retention basin. The site drainage system will also be connected to the City drainage system by installing an 18 -inch RCP storm drain line to connect to the existing City storm drain system in Poso Drive. The approximate length of the off-site 18-inch storm drain line is 50 feet. 115 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-6 Well No. 17
Construction of Well No. 17 includes the following:
• The well site will be graded to drain to an on-site retention basin. • A test well will initially be constructed to an approximate depth of 900 feet in order to evaluate water quality in the underlying aquifer.
• A production well is planned to be drilled to a n approximate depth of 1,300 feet and will be equipped with a vertical turbine pump and vertical hollow shaft electric motor and variable speed drive.
• The site will be fenced with a 6-foot-tall masonry block wall with a chain-link drive and personnel gate s. The well site will be surfaced with ¾” Class II aggregate base , with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building.
• The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and PLC and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate -controlled masonry block building.
• The well facility will also include a pad -mount emergency backup diesel generator.

The well discharge piping will be 10 -inch-diameter steel piping with valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic pressure vessel. • An 11-foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump. The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security. • The well discharge piping will transition below ground and to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system on Filburn Street. The approximate length of the off-site 12-inch water main is 195 feet.
• The site drainage system will be connected to the City drainage system by installing approximately 555 feet of 18 -inch RCP storm drain line on -site to connect to the existing City storm drain system that underlies the well site property.

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-7 along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building.
• The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and PLC and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate -controlled masonry block building.
• The well facility will also include a pad-mount emergency backup diesel generator. • The well discharge piping will be 10 -inch-diameter steel piping with valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000 -gallon hydropneumatic pressure vessel. An 11- foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump. The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security. • The well discharge piping will transition below ground and to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system on Central Avenue and Margalo Street. The approximate length of the off-site 12-inch water main is 250 feet.
• The site drainage system will be connected to the City drai nage system by installing an 18-inch RCP storm drain line to connect to the existing City storm drain system on Central Avenue and Margalo Street. The approximate length of the off -site 18-inch storm drain line is 1500 feet.

The production well drilling phase will involve the drilling of four municipal water wells and is anticipated to involve approximately 12 months. Each production well will involve approximately 60 working days to construct , with the well drilling activity taking place 24 hours per day, seven days per week for approximately 30 of those working days. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during construction activities:

• Well Drilling Rig
• Mud Pits
• Backhoe
• Loader
• Forklift

117 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-8 The well equipping and site development phase will involve the equipping of four municipal water wells and is anticipated to involve approximately 24 months. However, equipment will not run continually or on a daily basis throughout this entire construction period. It is anticipated that the following heavy pieces of equipment woul d be used for approximately 200 working days during construction activities:
• Excavator
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Roller
• Generator
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

UPGRADES TO EXISTING WELLS
Well No. 12
The existing City Well No. 12 has 1,2,3-TCP levels that exceed the State’s MCL. The City will install a GAC treatment to remove 1,2,3-TCP from the raw water. • The work will involve subgrade preparation and site earthwork, the construction of a reinforced concrete foundation for the tre atment vessels, modifications to the existing well discharge piping, and installation of influent, effluent, and backwash steel piping, valves, flowmeters, and appurtenances.
• Four 10 -foot-diameter by 22 -foot tall GAC vessels will be installed on a concrete foundation. Each vessel will be filled with approximately 21,000 lbs of carbon for the removal of 1,2,3-TCP.
• Exhausted media will be transported off-site and regenerated at an approved facility. • A blow-down pipeline will be installed for flushing the well and backwashing when necessary. The blow-down pipeline is a 12-inch C900 PVC pipeline to be installed east along McCombs Avenue and south along Annin Avenue to an existing City retention basin.
• A 35-foot-long cased crossing, 24-inch-diameter steel casing pipe, will be installed for the blow-down line across Annin Avenue. The approximate length of the off -site blow-down pipeline is 3,500 feet.
• In addition, the treatment site will include an 8 -feet by 14-feet wood building for a nitrate analyzer, an 11-foot by 13-foot concrete foundation and chain-link enclosure for a chlorine storage tank and chemical feed pump, electrical and control modifications, and ¾” Class II aggregate base well site ground cover. 118 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-9 The installation of the Well No. 12 treatment system is anticipated to involve approximately 11 months. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during approximately 80 working days of construction activities:
• Excavator
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Boring Machine
• Roller
• Generator
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

Well No. 2
This well has been out of service and inoperable for several years. The City intends to rehabilitate this well and utilize it for potable water service. The work includes replacing the vertical turbine pump, vertical hollow shaft electric motor, well discharge piping, hydropneumatic tank, electrical, and controls.
• The well site will be re-graded and a six-foot-tall masonry block wall with chain-link drive and personnel gates will be installed.
• The well site will be surfaced with ¾” Class II aggregate base, with the limits being the block wall and fencing and also three inches of asphalt paving along driveway corridors from the access gates to the well, chlorine building, generator, and electrical building.
• The well site will include an electrical meter main, motor control center, and PLC and will be installed on a concrete foundation inside a climate-controlled masonry block building.
• The well facility will also include a pad -mount emergency backup diesel generator.

The well discharge piping will be 10 -inch-diameter steel piping with valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic pressure vessel. • An 11-foot by 11-foot concrete foundation will be constructed for a 12.5 percent sodium hypochlorite storage tank and chemical feed pump. The chlorine tank and injection pump will be enclosed in a steel structure for shade and security. • The well discharge piping will transition below ground and to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system on Leonard Avenue. The approximate length of the off -site 12- inch water main is 50 feet. The site drainage system will be connected to an on -site retention basin.
119 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-10 The rehabilitation of the existing Well No. 2 and the site development for that facility is anticipated to involve approximately 16 months. It is anticipated that the following pieces of equipment would be used during approximately 100 working days of construction activities:
• Excavator
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Roller
• Generator
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

Storage Tank and Booster Pump Station
A new storage tank and booster pumping station will be constructed. The 1.0 MG storage tank will be filled by a dedicated pipeline from the existing Well No. 13. • The 1.0 MG storage tank will be constructed in accordance with AWWA D100, be approximately 80 feet in diameter by 28 feet tall, and will be painted a neutral color to blend in with the surrounding area.
• The water from the storage tank will be conveyed to the City distribution system with a booster pump station.
• The booster pump station will consist of three horizontal centrifugal booster pumps, each rated for 500 gpm and 40 hp with variable speed drives, steel piping, valves, a flow meter, appurtenances, and a 6,000 gpm hydropneumatic tank. • The pump station will be constructed in a fashion to allow for future expansion to a 3,500 gpm total capacity.
• The booster pump discharge piping will transition below ground to 12-inch C900 PVC pipe prior to leaving the site. The 12-inch C900 PVC piping will connect to the existing City distribution system on Wasco Avenue. The approximate length of the off-site 12- inch water main is 300 feet.

The construction of 1.0 MG storage tank s and booster pump station s is anticipated to be approximately 11 months. However, it is expected that the following pieces of equipment would be used during approximately 80 working days of construction activities:
• Excavator
• Loader
• Backhoe
• Crane
120 of 676
Project Description

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-11 • Concrete Trucks
• Roller
• Generator
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) System
An AMI will be installed throughout the City to remotely collect customer water usage data in real-time for each of the water service meters. This will include the installation of a meter interface unit at each service meter throughout the City and the wireless transmission of data to the City via a fixed network. The majority of the work will include the installation of software program upgrades to existing meter boxes. The Project will also include the installation of 5,173 new service meters and an AMI remote metering system. It is anticipated that this task will take approximately 55 months; approximately 500 new meters will be upgraded every three months.

Wells to be Abandoned
Upon completion of the Project, the existing wells that are being replaced – Wells No. 7, No. 8, No. 10, and No. 11 , will be destroyed in accordance with the Kern County and applicable State Standards.

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2-12 • Backhoe
• Crane
• Concrete Trucks
• Generator
• Air Compressor
• Small Tools
• Service Truck

Construction of the Project is anticipated to span an approximate 4.5-year period. Several of the Project components will be constructed concurrently with other work.

Change in Land Use Designation and Zone District
As a part of this Project, the City will change the current land use designation and zone district of the Well No. 17 property from R-1-6 Low Density Residential (6,000 sq. ft. lot) to P-F (Public Facilities). This will allow the City to utilize the property for city-related purposes.
122 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-1 SECTION 3 - INITIAL STUDY

3.1 - Environmental Checklist

1. Project Title:

Water System Improvement Project

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Wasco Community Development Planning Division
764 E Street
Wasco, CA 93280

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Keri Cobb
(661) 758-7211

4. Project Location:

Please see Section 3.2.

5. General Plan Designation:

Please see Section 3.3.

6. Zoning:

Please see Section 3.3

7. Description of Project:

Please see Section 3.4.

8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

Please see Section 3.3

9. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval May be Required:
• Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
• California Department of Water Resources
• California State Water Resources Control Board
• San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

123 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-2

3.2 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality
Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities / Service
Systems
Wildfire Mandatory Findings of
Significance

3.3 - Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed Project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (a) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (b) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
124 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-3 adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLA RATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required.

Maria Lara 1/26/2023

Signature Date
Maria Lara
Printed Name For
125 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-4

3.4 - Evaluation of Environmental Impacts

1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to Projects like the one involved (e.g., the Project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on Project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the Project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a Project- specific screening analysis).

2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as Project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.

3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.

4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less-Than-Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less -than- significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced).

5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.

Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earli er document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the Project.
126 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-5

6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.

7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.

8. This is only a sug gested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a Project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.

9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
127 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-6

Discussion
Impact #3.4.1a – Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? The City of Wasco General Plan does not list any scenic viewpoints within the City (City of Wasco, 2016) . No known aesthetic resources exist on or near the site s. The site s are not within or in the vicinity of a city, county, or State identified scenic vista. Furthermore, the development of the Project would not block or preclude views of any area containing importance or what would be considered visually appealing landforms. Therefore, no scenic resources or vistas will be affected.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.1 - AESTHETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources Code
Section 21099, would the Project:

a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?

b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?

c. In non-urbanized area, substantially degrade
the existing visual character or quality of
public views of the site and its surroundings?
If the Project is in an urbanized area, would
the Project conflict with applicable zoning
and other regulations governing scenic
quality?

d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare that would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?

□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
128 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-7 Impact #3.4.1b – Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? See Impact #3.4.1a above.

The Project does not lie near or within a State Designated or Eligible State Scenic Highway (California Department of Transportation, 2023) . The nearest Eligible Scenic Highway is State Route (SR) 190, approximately 34 miles northwest of the City. The Project does not include the removal of trees d etermined to be scenic or of scenic value, the destruction of rock outcroppings or degradation of any historic building(s). Therefore, the Project would have no impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.1c – In non-urbanized area, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? If the Project is in an urbanized area, would the Project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
The Project includes sites in areas considered non -urbanized and those in more developed, urbanized areas. The Project will not result in development that is substantially dif ferent than surrounding land uses. The new water storage tanks will be approximately 28 feet tall.

However, they will be installed in an area that is either relatively sparsely developed or undeveloped, with few sensitive receptors which might view the tan ks. For the proposed new wells, a six-foot-tall masonry block wall with a chain-link fence will be constructed.

However, the new wells will be constructed on sites that have few nearby sensitive receptors. The upgrades to existing well sites will not be su bstantially changed in visual appearance and will not alter the visual character of the site.

The Project’s appearance would not substantially degrade the visual character of the site and would be similar to the existing development s surrounding the Project site. Therefore, the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact on the visual quality of the area.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.
129 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-8 Impact #3.4.1d – Would the Project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Construction of the proposed Project would generally occur during daytime hours, typically from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Drilling activities are continual and, therefore, would be conducted on a 24-hour schedule. However, all lighting would be directed downward and shielded to focus illumination on the desired work areas only to prevent light spillage onto adjacent properties. Because lighting used to illuminate work areas would be shielded and focused downward, the potential for lighting to affect any residents adversely is minimal. Increased truck traffic and the transport of construction materials to the Project site would also be minimal and temporary in nature. Construction activity would focus on specific areas on the sites, and any sources of glare would not be stationary for a prolonged period of time.

Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not create a new source of substantial glare that would affect daytime views in the area.

Once constructed, the Project will include security lighting on motion detectors or increase lighting beyond the present levels at the existing well sites that would spill over onto surrounding uses. With the compliance of the Wasco Zoning Ordinance and other applicable local development standards , the proposed Project would not create new source s of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.
130 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-9

Discussion
Impact #3.4.2a – Would the Project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use?

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.2 - AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California D epartment of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the Project:

a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?

b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use or a Williamson Act contract?

c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code S ection 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code Section 51104(g))?

d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?

e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non -agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?

□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
131 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-10 The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) designation of the Project components is listed below (California Department of Conservation, 2022):

Existing Wells No. 7, 8, 10, 11: Urban and Built-Up Land Storage Tank Near Well No. 13: Urban and Built-Up Land
Existing Well No. 2: Prime Farmland
Well No. 15: Urban and Built-Up Land
Well No. 16 and tank: Vacant or Disturbed Land
Well No. 17: Prime Farmland
Well No. 18: Prime Farmland

The Project sites and surrounding area are currently zoned for non-agricultural uses and, as such, would have been previously analyzed when the land was originally converted .

Additionally, Wells No. 2, 8, 10, 11 , 12, and 13 are already existing . New Well No. 16 is on land that is classified as Urban and Built-Up. Therefore, there would be no impact related to these Project components.

New Wells No. 17 and 18 are on land that is classified as Prime Farmland. However, these sites are approximately one acre in size, and the loss of such a minimal amount of Prime Farmland would be considered less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.2b – Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
The Project sites are not subject to a Williamson Act land use contract , according to data available from the California Department of Conservation. As noted in Table 2-2, none of the Project sites are zoned for agricultural use. Therefore, the construction of the Project would not result in a conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract, and there would be no impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be no impact.
132 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-11 Impact #3.4.2c – Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Pr oduction (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
The Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 12220(g) and Section 4526 defines “Forest land” as land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural cond itions and that allows for the management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. Timberland, pursuant to PRC 4526, is land other than land owned by the federal government and land designated as experimental forest land, which is available for and capable of growing a crop of trees of a commercial species used to produce lumber and other forest products, including Christmas trees.

There are no forest lands or timberlands identified on the Project sites or within its vicinity.

The Project would not result in the loss or conversion of forest land to a non -forest use.

Therefore, there would be no impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.2d – Would the Project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
See discussion of Impact #3.4.2c above.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.2e – Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non -agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
See discussion of Impacts #3.4.2a, #3.4.2b, and #3.4.2c above. 133 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-12

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

134 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-13

Discussion
The analyses in this section are based on a Small Project Analysis Level Assessment (Trinity Consultants, 2022) attached as Appendix A.

Impact #3.4.3a – Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
The Project is within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB) and under the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). The adopted Air Quality Attainment Plans for the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin set forth comprehensive programs that will lead the SJVAB into compliance with federal and State ambient air quality standards.

The Project was determined to be qualified under SJVAPCD Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL) thresholds and could be assessed as a SPAL pursuant to SJVAPCD guidelines. The SJVAPCD SPAL review parameters determine whether a project qualifies as a “small project.” Table 3.4.3-1 below provides a comparison of SPAL parameters to the proposed Project. The SJVPACD determined that if a project is found to be “less than” the SPAL established parameters, then the project has “no possibility of exceeding criteria pollutant emissions thresholds” (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2015).

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.3 - AIR QUALITY

Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the Project:

a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan?

b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the Project region is non -attainment under
an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard?

c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odor) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?

□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
135 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-14 Table 3.4.3-1
Industrial Projects SPAL Reference Sizes
Land Use Category -
Industrial
Project Size (Square
Feet)*
ADT One-Way for all
Fleet Types (except
HHDT)
ADT One-Way for
HHDT Trips only
General Light
Industry
280,000 550 70
Heavy Industry 900,000 550 70
Industrial Park 295,000 550 70
Manufacturing 472,000 550 70
Proposed Project** 67,780 1 0
SPAL Exceeded? No No No
Notes: *Project size based on SPAL Table 4(a)(b), as posted on SJVAPCD webpage:
https://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI-SPAL.PDF**Proposed Project size includes the estimated area where construction activities will take place (2 x 1024 square feet) and square footage of piping trenching (3.9 miles of pipe with a 6feet wide trench).

Source: Appendix A
The EPA has established the Federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program to determine what comprises significant impact levels (SIL) to NAAQS attainment areas. A project’s impacts are considered l ess than significant if emissions are below PSD SIL for a particular pollutant. When a SIL is exceeded, an additional “increment analysis” is required.

The PSD SIL thresholds are used with ambient air quality modeling for a CEQA project to address whether the project would “violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.” Ambient air quality emissions estimates below the PSD SIL thresholds would result in less -than-significant ambient air quality impacts for both a project and cumulative CEQA impact analysis. The SJVAB is classified as non -attainment for the O 3 NAAQS and, as such, is subject to “non -attainment new source review” (NSR). PSD SILs and increments are more stringent than the CAAQS or NAAQS and represent the most stringent thresholds of significance. As the Project would not include modification to the stationary source under NSR, it would not be subject to either PSD or NSR review.

The SJVAPCD has identified quantitative emission thresholds to evaluate the potential air quality impacts of a project. Emissions exceeding the established significance thresholds would be considered to have a significant impact if not adequately mitigated to below the thresholds. The SJVA PCD air quality thresholds from the GAMAQI are presented in Table

3.4.3-2 below. Construction emissions and operational emissions are separated, with operational emissions being further separated into permitted operational emissions and non-permitted operational emissions to determine significance thresholds for air pollutant emissions.

136 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-15 Table 3.4.3-2
SJVAPCD Air Quality Thresholds of Significance – Criteria Pollutants Pollutant/Precursor
Construction Emissions Operational Emissions
Emissions (tons per yr.)
Permitted Equipment
and Activities
Non-Permitted
Equipment and
Activities
Emissions (tons per yr.) Emissions (tons per yr.)
CO 100 100 100
NOx 10 10 10
ROG 10 10 10
SOx 27 27 27
PM10 15 15 15
PM2.5 15 15 15
Source: Appendix A
As noted, the Project is below the SPAL screening threshold and is not expected to result in significant criteria pollutant emissions. The Project is predominantly construction related , with operations limited to the maintenance of the well, tank sites, and associated infrastructure. The Project is deemed to have a less -than-significant impact and would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.3b – Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
Using project type and size categories, the SJVAPCD has pre -quantified emissions and determined a size below which it is reasonable to conclude that a proje ct would not exceed applicable thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants. This Project was determined to qualify under the SPAL. Pursuant to SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI and SPAL guidelines, a cursory review of Project emissions was estimated using CalEEMod and provided in Table 3.4.3 -3 and Table 3.4.3-4.

Short-term criteria pollutant emissions were calculated based on the anticipated construction timelines, equipment needed, and default emission factors for said equipment.

The construction period is anticipated to span approximately 4.5 years , with several of the Project components to be constructed concurrently. Construction emissions estimates also included PM 10 reduction measures in compliance with SJVAPCD Regulation VIII I
137 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-16 requirements, including exposed area watering three times a day and vehicle speed reduction to less than 15 miles per hour. Table 3.4.3-3 below summarizes estimated Project construction emissions. Construction -related emissions over the anticipated construction period are estimated to not exceed SJVAPCD construction emissions thresholds and would result in a less-than-significant impact.

Table 3.4.3-3
Construction Emissions
Emissions Source Pollutant
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
2023 Construction 0.137 0.890 1.128 0.002 0.053 0.041
2024 Construction 0.164 1.499 1.802 0.004 0.110 0.067
2025 Construction 0.102 0.912 1.117 0.002 0.079 0.042
2026 Construction 0.030 0.274 0.330 0.001 0.013 0.011
2027 Construction 0.069 0.584 0.756 0.002 0.025 0.023
Maximum (tons/yr.) 0.164 1.499 1.802 0.004 0.110 0.067
Maximum (pounds/day) 5.377 49.138 59.072 0.142 3.616 2.187 SJVAPCD Construction Emissions Threshold
(tons/yr.)
10 10 100 27 15 15
Is Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Source: Appendix A
Long-term criteria pollutant emissions are caused by operational mobile, area, and stationary sources. The only long -term emissions from this Project would be from maintenance trips which are already required for the existing wells , along with minimal incremental increases in electricity usage from the water tank’s booster pump. Emerge ncy generators located at Well No. 15, Well No. 16, Well No. 17, and Well No. 18 would be present.

The Project’s long-term air quality emissions are shown in Table 3.4.3 -4 below and are not expected to pose significant impacts to criteria air pollutants.

Table 3.4.3-4
Operational Emissions
Emissions Source Pollutant
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Operational Emissions (pounds/day) 3.9272 12.6278 8.7626 0.0166 0.5063 0.5063 Operational Emissions (tons/yr.) 0.7167 2.3064 1.5992 0.0030 0.0924 0.0924 SJVAPCD Operational Emissions
Thresholds – Non-permitted Sources
10 10 100 27 15 15
Is Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Source: Appendix A
Based on the above analysis, the proposed Project does not have the possibility of exceeding the criteria pollutant emissions threshold and is under the reporting limit for recommendations and guidelines emissions estimates prepared pursuant to the SPAL assessment. The Project does not conflict with or obstruct implementation of an applicable 138 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-17 air quality plan or exceed the SJVAPCD’s established emissions thresholds and significance thresholds for all CEQA air quality determinations. Therefore, this Project would not pose a significant impact to the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. The proposed Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.3 c – Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Sensitive receptors are defined as areas where young children, chronically ill individuals, the elderly, or people who are more sensitive than the general population reside. The following locations are where several sensitive receptors are likely to reside and be affected by substantial pollutant concentrations: schools, hospitals, nursing homes, and daycare centers.

As the Project involves s ites scattered throughout the City of Wasco, a one -mile radius around each site was utilized to identify nearby sensitive receptors; however, a one -mile radius would encompass the entire town. Therefore, all sensitive receptors within the City of Wasco would be within the established one-mile radius of a Project component.

As part of the prepared SPAL Assessment, an analysis of potentially toxic air contaminants (TACs) was conducted. TACs, as defined by the California Health & Safety Code (CH&SC) §44321, are listed in Appendices AI and AII in AB 2588 Air Toxic “Hot Spots” and Assessment Act’s Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guideline Regulation document. The proposed Project includes the removal of asbestos -containing pipelines and the operation of die sel- powered equipment, which would potentially result in emissions of TACs. SJVAPCD has set the level of significance for carcinogenic risk at 20 in one million, which is understood as the possibility of causing 20 additional cancer cases in a population of one million people. The level of significance for chronic and acute non -cancer risk is a hazard index of 1.0. All receptors were modeled as residential receptors . The carcinogenic risk and the health hazard index (HI) for chronic non-cancer risk at the point of maximum impact (PMI) do not exceed the significance levels of 20 in one million (20 x 10 -6) and 1.0, respectively , for the proposed Project. Table 3.4.3-5 summarizes the potential maximum impacts predicted by the Hotspot Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP2) distributed by CARB , with the full analysis and calculations attached as Appendix A.
139 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-18 Table 3.4.3-5
Potential Maximum Impacts Predicted by HARP
Value UTM East UTM North
Excess Cancer Risk 1.59E-05 286341.4 3942703.2
Chronic Hazard Risk 3.31E-02 286341.4 3942703.2
Source: Appendix A
The maximum predicted cancer risk for the proposed Project is 1.59E-05, and the maximum chronic non -cancer hazard index is 3.31E -02. Since the predicted risks are below the significance threshold for cancer and chronic risk, the Project would not have an adverse effect to any of the surrounding communities.

Once operationa l, the Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations, and therefore it would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of localized PM10, carbon monoxide, diesel particulate matter, hazardous air pollutants, or naturally occurring asbestos.

The Project is not expected to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Therefore, the Project will have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.3 d – Would the Project result in emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
As discussed in Impact #3.4.3c above, some odors could result from vehicles and equipment using diesel fuels during the construction phase. The emissions associated with the construction of the Project would be temporary in nature and are not anticipated to result in the generation of a subst antial amount of hazardous air pollutants. The operation of the proposed Project will not result in emissions or odors. Therefore, the Project will have a less- than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.
140 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-19

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.4 - BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:

a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special -status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wi ldlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?

c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?

d. Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species, or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?

e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?

f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
habitat conservation plan, natural community
conservation plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?

Discussion
These biological resources evaluation is based upon a review of available literature and databases and existing site conditions evaluated during a reconnaissance survey. These studies evaluated the potential for sensitive biological resources to occur on and in the vicinity of the Project and any impacts that could potentially occur. Reviews of the California □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
141 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-20 Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFW, 2022), California Native Plant Society (CNPS) (California Native Plant Society, 2020), and United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2022) was conducted to identify special- status plant and wildlife species with the potential to occur within the Project site and vicinity (the surrounding nine quads and a 10 -mile radius). Information on the potential presence of wetlands and waters was obtained from the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), National Hydrography Database (NHD), and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Information regarding the presence of Critical Habitat in the Project vicinity was obtained from the USFWS’s Critical Habitat Mapper database. The results of the database inquiries were subsequently reviewed to evaluate the potential for the occurrence of special- status species and other sensitive biological resources known to occur on or near the Project site.

QK biologists conducted a biological reconnaissance survey of th e Project site s in August 2022, which included the four proposed well sites with associated pipelines and other infrastructure and accessible areas within a 250 feet biological survey area (BSA) buffer.

Meandering pedestrian transects were walked through t he BSA to achieve 100 percent visual coverage with the aid of high -power binoculars in areas that were inaccessible. The purpose of the survey was to identify existing plant communities and any sensitive habitats, the presence and potential for the occurrence of special-status plant and wildlife species, and to identify any other sensitive biological resources within the BSA. Protocol surveys for specific special-status wildlife species were not conducted. Locations of sensitive biological resources were do cumented using the ArcGIS Collector application installed on an iPad.

Photographs were taken to document the existing landscape and sensitive biological resources. Detailed notes of observed plant and wildlife species and site conditions were taken while conducting the survey.

General Site Conditions
The Project site s are within the City of Wasco, Kern County, California, and are situated among urban and agricultural development. The Project sites with existing wells and water- related infrastructure are heavily disturbed and contain no native habitat. Site conditions at each of the individual Project components are detailed below.

WELL SITE NO. 15
The proposed site is located on the northwest corner of J Street and 9th Street within a vacant housing development. The proposed site consists of abandoned buildings surrounded by regrowth of ruderal and non-native vegetation. There are two proposed pipelines to the well site; one extends east along 9th Street, and the other crosses 9th Street and extends to the southwest corner of the J Street and 9th Street intersection. Both pipelines will be located along paved surfaces (9th Street or sidewalks) devoid of vegetation. The entirety of the proposed well site has experienced significant historical, as well as ongoing ground disturbance from the construction and operation of the housing complex and roadway.

There is no suitable habitat for sensitive biologic al resources on the site. The site is 142 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-21 surrounded by industrial facilities and active agriculture. There are active agricultural fields to the east that contain an associated retention basin that was dry at the time of the survey.

Ornamental trees are prese nt along the fence line of the industrial facility located south of the proposed well site that may be utilized by nesting birds.

WELL SITE NO. 16
The proposed site is located within a vacant lot on the southeast corner of Central Avenue and Poso Drive. The proposed well site, associated pipeline, storage tank, and booster pump station are located within the northeast section of the lot, which has been recently grubbed and contains little ruderal vegetation. The proposed well site is within an area that has been completely disturbed, and there is no suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources on the site. The site is surrounded by residential and agricultural development; active almond orchards are located to the west, and residences with various orn amental trees are located to the north, east, and south.

WELL SITE NO. 17
The proposed site is located southeast of the intersection of Central Avenue and Filburn Avenue. The proposed well site is located within a disked crop field south of Filburn Avenue.

The associated pipeline is located on a vacant lot north of Filburn Avenue containing some ruderal vegetation and is adjacent to residential properties and roadways. Several California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi) burrows were observed with in the vacant lot where the proposed pipeline will be located. The proposed well site has been completely disturbed from either existing residential housing or agriculture. There is no suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources on the site.

However, there are active agricultural uses to the west and south and ornamental trees in the residences. A second retention basin associated with residential development is located within the BSA, east of the proposed well site. The retention basin is fenced, and access was limited; however, it contained several small pools of stagnant water at the time of the survey.

The Project will not impact this basin.

WELL SITE NO. 18
The proposed site is located north of the intersection of North Central Avenue and Marga lo Street. The proposed well site and associated pipeline are located on recently disked cropland containing marginal regrowth of ruderal vegetation. There are active agricultural uses to the north and southeast and ornamental trees within the commercial d evelopment to the southwest. California ground squirrels and burrows were observed within the BSA in the fields north of Margalo Street. Evidence of Botta’s pocket gopher ( Thomomys bottae), such as vertically sloped burrows with adjacent soil mounding, was also observed within the fields. The site is an area that has been completely disturbed with existing commercial development and cropland. There is no suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources on the site.
143 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-22 WELL SITE NO. 12 PIPELINE ALIGNMENT
The site consists of a proposed pipeline from the existing well and is located along McCombs Road and Annin Avenue. The proposed pipeline will be aligned along the existing road rights of way.

The site is bordered by residential development, active almond orchards, a recently cleared deciduous orchard now overgrown with ruderal vegetation, and active construction associated with the California High-Speed Rail. Small mammal burrows were observed along the southern road shoulder of McCombs Road; all burrows either displayed sign of previous use by Botta’s pocket gopher or did not appear to actively be used by wildlife (weathered and/or collapsed at opening). California ground squirrel burrows were observed within the deciduous orchard located north of McCombs Road and within the orchard located east of Annin Avenue. The site is an area that has been completely disturbed, and there is no suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources on the site. There are active agricultural uses along the alignment and ornamental trees in the residences that may be utilized by nesting birds.

J STREET STORAGE TANK AND BOOSTER PUMP STATION
The site consists of a fenced lot currently used for the storage of vehicles and equipment. The lot contained regrowth of ruderal vegetation. California ground squirrel burrows were observed along the southern fence line of the lot. The entire Project site has experienced significant historical as well as ongoing ground dis turbance from the construction and operation of the facility. There is no suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources or trees suitable for nesting birds on the site. There are active agricultural uses to the south.

There were 30 plant species and 11 wildlife species identified during the survey, either through direct observation or by the presence of diagnostic sign (Table 3.4.4 -1). None of these species are listed under the Federal or California Endangered Species Act.

Table 3.4.4-1
List of Plant and Wildlife Species Observed on the Biological Survey Area Scientific Name Common Name
Well
15 Well
16 Well
17 Well
18 Well
12 Storage Tank/
Booster Pump
Plant
Amaranthus albus pigweed
amaranth X
Amaranthus palmeri careless weed X X
Amsinckia sp. fiddleneck X
Avena fatua wild oat X
Brassica nigra black mustard X
Bromus diandrus ripgut brome X
Bromus madritensis
ssp. rubens red brome X X X X X X
Chenopodium album lamb’s quarters X X
Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass X X X
Datura wrightii jimsonweed
144 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-23 Scientific Name Common Name
Well
15 Well
16 Well
17 Well
18 Well
12 Storage Tank/
Booster Pump
Erigeron canadensis horseweed X X
Eucalyptus sp. eucalyptus X
Helianthus annuus common
sunflower X X
Hoffmannseggia glauca Indian rushpea X
Hordeum jubatum foxtail barley X X
Lactuca serriola prickly lettuce X X X X
Medicago sativa alfalfa X
Pinus sp. pine X
Polypogon
monspeliensis rabbitsfoot grass X
Portulaca oleracea common purslane X
Prunus dulcis almond X X
Salsola tragus Russian thistle X X X X X X
Senecio vulgaris common
groundsel X X
Solanum
elaeagnifolium
silverleaf
nightshade X X X
Sorghum halepense Johnson grass X
Typha sp. cattail X
Tribulus terrestris puncture vine X X X
Ulmus sp. elm X
Washington robusta Mexican fan palm X
Wildlife
Aphelocoma californica Californian scrub
jay X
Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk X
Canis lupus familiaris domestic dog X*
Cathartes aura turkey vulture X
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow X X X
Mimus polyglottos northern
mockingbird X X
Otospermophilus
beecheyi
California ground
squirrel X* X X X*
Sturnus vulgaris common starling X
Thomomys bottae Botta’s pocket
gopher X* X*
Uta stansburiana side-blotched
lizard X X
Zenaida macroura mourning dove X X X
* Indicates diagnostic sign of the species was observed, but not the individuals directly.

Impact Analysis
This section describes the results of the database searches and, using conditions present on the Project as determined by the survey, provides an analysis of Project impacts on each of the six biological evaluation criteria. Each of the evaluation criteria is discussed below, and mitigation measures are provided as warranted to, when implemented, reduce impacts to below-significant levels.
145 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-24 Impact #3.4.4a – Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special- status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The literature search indicated the re is potential for several special -status species to be present on or in the vicinity of the Project. An evaluation of each potential special -status species, including habitat requirements, the likelihood of required habitat to occur within the Project si te, and a comparison to the CNDDB, CNPS, and USFWS IPaC records , was conducted. The results of this evaluation concluded that 14 plant species and 23 wildlife species with special status have a reasonable potential to occur on or near the Project.

Special-Status Species

SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT SPECIES
Based on the survey and database queries, there are 14 special-status plant species that have the potential to occur within the subject quadrangle and eight surrounding quadrangles. The majority of the Project sites and adjacent land has been historically disturbed by agricultural practices and /or urban/industrial development. None of the sensitive -plant species were observed during the survey, although the survey was not conducted during the blooming periods of any of the species. However, there is no suitable habitat to support the growth of these plant species, and it is highly unlikely that these plants would inhabit any of the sites.

All Project activities will be restricted to previously disturbed and routinely maintained areas that would not support special -status plant species. Thus, no protective measures for special-status plant species are warranted.

SENSITIVE WILDLIFE SPECIES
Based on the database queries , there were 23 special -status wildlife species that were identified as having the potential to occur within the subject quadrangle and eight surrounding quadrangles. Twenty of these species were eliminated from consideration due to the lack of suitable habitat or because the Project is outside the range of these species.

The remaining three species resulting from the database queries have the potential to occur within the Project site and vicinity: burrowing owl ( Athene cunicularia), Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), and San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica). Nesting birds protected by the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) may also be present during the breeding and nesting season.

Swainson’s Hawk
Swainson’s hawk ( Buteo swainsoni) is a State Threatened species and has the potential to occur in the habitat in the vicinity of the Project but is unlikely to be present within the Project footprint. Swainson’s hawks forage in agricultural crops, shrublands, and grasslands and typically nest in scat tered trees or small groves. There is suitable foraging habitat and nesting trees in the vicinity of the Project, although the Project footprint itself does not 146 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-25 provide suitable breeding or foraging habitat. The nearest CNDDB occurrence is approximately 0.69 miles northwest of Well Site No. 15, where a Swainson’s hawk nest was observed in a cottonwood tree in April 1929 (EONDX 91379).

The BSA does not contain suitable nesting habitat for Swainson’s hawk, and there is a limited prey base for the species in the BSA. The small, planted trees in the surrounding area provide marginal nesting habitat, and larger planted trees in the vicinity of the Project (at residences, roadways, etc.) would provide more suitable nesting sites. Because the Project does not provide suitable foraging or nesting habitat and has a small footprint, the development of the Project would not result in a significant loss of habitat for the species. If the species were to be nesting within 0.5 mile s of the Project during construction activ ities, normal reproductive or foraging behaviors could be affected. Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-3, BIO- 4, BIO-5, and BIO-6 require a pre-construction clearance survey and implementation of the appropriate protocol if the Project is constructed during nesting and breeding season and if Swainson’s hawk is observed. A Worker Environmental Awareness Training (WEAT) would also be conducted prior to construction activities. These measures are designed to reduce or eliminate direct impacts to this species to a less-than-significant level.

Burrowing Owl
Burrowing owl ( Athene cunicularia ), a CDFW Species of Special Concern, has a very low potential to occur within the Project sites. The nearest C NDDB record is approximately 8.3 miles southwest of the Project, where three adults were observed at a burrow in 2003 (EONDX 66837). There were no suitable burrows observed within the BSA at each site, and only marginal foraging habitat is available.

Because the Project sites support only marginal habitat for burrowing owl s, and each is a small area, the development of the Project would not result in a significant loss of habitat for the species. If the species were to be present during construction activit ies, individual burrowing owls could be injured or killed, or normal reproductive or foraging behaviors could be affected. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO -1, BIO-3, BIO-4, BIO-5, and BIO-6 are designed to reduce or eliminate direct impacts to thi s species to a less -than- significant level.

San Joaquin Kit Fox
San Joaquin kit fox, a Federally Endangered and State Threatened species, has the potential to occur in the habitat surrounding the Project but is unlikely to den within the BSA, although it could pass through as a transient. The nearest CNDDB record for the species is from 1971 and approximately 3.4 miles west of the Project, documenting a San Joaquin kit fox sighting, roadkill, or den (EONDX 67802). The agricultural land provides only margina l denning habitat for the species, and there were few small mammal burrows observed, so the natural prey base is likely to be very limited. However, San Joaquin kit foxes are known to adapt well to urban and residential areas and scavenge anthropogenic foods, which may be available in nearby residential neighborhoods. No known or potential kit fox dens or any sign of the species were observed during the survey.
147 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-26 San Joaquin kit foxes are known to be in the Project region and to adapt well to human presence, so the species could be present on or near the Project as a transient or become an established resident at any time. Because the Project supports only marginal habitat and is a small area, development of the Project area would not result in a significant loss of habitat for the species. If the species were to be present during construction activities , individual San Joaquin kit foxes could be injured or killed, or normal reproductive or foraging behaviors could be affected. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO -1, BIO -2, and BIO -6 are designed to reduce or eliminate direct impacts to this species to a less-than-significant level.

Nesting Migratory Birds
Migratory bird species are protected under the Federal MBTA. No active or inactive bird nests were observed during the survey, which was conducted outside of the typical avian breeding season (February 1 – August 15). The Project and surrounding vicinity provide suitable nesting habitat for a variety of bird species which may nest in tree branches and cavities, shrubs, man-made structures, and directly on the ground. If nesting migratory birds are in the vicinity of the Project dur ing construction activities, individual birds could be injured or killed, or normal reproductive or foraging behaviors could be affected.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO -1, BIO-3, BIO-4, BIO-5, and BIO-6 are designed to reduce or eliminate direct impacts to this species to a less-than-significant level.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
MM BIO-1 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, No. 18, and No. 19): Within 14 days prior to the start of Project ground -disturbing activities, a pre -construction survey with a 5 00-foot buffer, where land access is permitted, shall be conducted by a qualified biologist knowledgeable in the identification of special -status species such as San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF), burrowing owl (WEBO), etc. If dens/burrows/nests that could suppor t any of these special-status species are discovered during the pre -construction survey, the avoidance buffers outlined below shall be established, and den or burrow monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012) and USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance.

If any burrowing owl burrows are observed during the pre -construction survey, avoidance measures shall be consistent with those included in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012). If occupied burrowing owl burrows are observed outside of the breeding season (September 1 through January 31) and within 250 feet of proposed construction activities, a passive relocation effort may be instituted in accordance with the guidelines established by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2012). During the breeding season (February 1 through August 31), a 500-foot (minimum) buffer zone shall be maintained unless a qualified biologist verifies through noninvasive methods that either the birds have not begun egg laying and incubation or that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.
148 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-27 Den(s) or burrow(s) may be monitored u sing trail cameras or tracking medium such as diatomaceous earth. If no species are detected for a minimum of four consecutive days/nights, the den or burrow may be burrow -scoped and plugged with a filled sandbag under the direct supervision of a qualified and approved CDFW biologist. All tunnels must be examined for animal presence before plugging with a sandbag to ensure no burrowing owls, kit foxes, or other animals are hiding inside.

SJKF
Potential or Atypical den – 50 feet
Known den – 100 feet
Natal Den –Contact CDFW for consultation
MM BIO -2: The following avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented during all phases of the Project to reduce the potential for impact from the Project. They are modified from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered SJKF Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS, 2011, Appendix F).
a. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in securely closed containers. All food -related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in securely closed containers and removed at least once a week from the construction or Project site. b. Construction-related vehicle traffic shall be restricted to established roads and predetermined ingress and egress corridors, staging, and parking areas. Vehicle speeds shall not exceed 20 miles per hour (mph) within the Project site. c. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit fox or other animals during construction, the contractor shall cover all excavated, steep -walled holes or trenches more than two feet deep at the close of each workday with plywood or similar materials. If holes or trenches cannot be covered, one or more escape ramps constructed of earthen fill or wooden planks shall be installed in the trench. Before such holes or trenches are filled, the contractor shall thoroughly inspect them for entrapped animals. All construction-related pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored on the Project site shall be thoroughly inspected for wildlife before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If at any time an entrapped or injured kit fox is discovered, work in the immediate area shall be temporarily halted, and USFWS and CDFW shall be consulted. d. Kit foxes are attracted to den-like structures such as pipes and may enter stored pipes and become trapped or injured. All construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored at a construction site for one or more overnight periods shall be thoroughly inspected for kit foxes before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If a kit fox is 149 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-28 discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved until the USFWS and CDFW have been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved only once to remove it from the path of construction activity until the fox has escaped.
e. No pets, such as dogs or cats, shall be permitted on the Project sites to prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes, or destruction of dens. f. Use of anti-coagulant rodenticides and herbicides in Project sites shall be restricted.

This is necess ary to prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit foxes and the depletion of prey populations on which they depend. All uses of such compounds shall observe labels and other restrictions mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and other State and federal legislation, as well as additional Project-related restrictions deemed necessary by the USFWS and CDFW. If rodent control must be conducted, zinc phosphide shall be used because of the proven lower risk to kit foxes.
g. A representative shall be appointed by the Project proponent who will be the contact source for any employee or contractor who might inadvertently kill or injure a kit fox or who finds a dead, injured , or entrapped kit fox. The repr esentative shall be identified during the employee education program , and their name and telephone number shall be provided to the USFWS.
h. The Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office of USFWS and CDFW shall be notified in writing within three working days of th e accidental death or injury to a SJKF during Project-related activities. Notification must include the date, time, and location of the incident or of the finding of a dead or injured animal and any other pertinent information. The USFWS contact is the Chief of the Division of Endangered Species at the addresses and telephone numbers below. The CDFW contact can be reached at (559) 243-4014 and [email protected].
i. All sightings of the SJKF shall be reported to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). A copy of the reporting form and a topographic map clearly marked with the location of where the kit fox was observed shall also be provided to the Service at the address below.
j. Any Project-related information required by the USFWS or questions concerning the above conditions or their implementation may be directed in writing to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at Endangered Species Division, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W 2605, Sacramento, California 95825 -1846, phone: (916) 414 -6620 or (916) 414 - 6600.
k. New sightings of SJKF should be reported to the CNDDB.

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-29 or substrates must be monitored for activity on a routine and repeating basis throughout the breeding season or until Swainson’s hawks or other raptor species are verified to be using them. The protocol recommends that the following visits be made to each nest or nesting site: one visit from January 1 –March 20 to identify potential nest sites, three visits from March 20–April 5, three visits from April 5–April 20, and three visits during June 10–July 30.

A fewer number of visits may be permissible if deemed adequate by the City after consultation with a qualified biologist. To meet the minimum level of protection for the species, surveys shal l be completed for at least two survey periods immediately prior to Project-related ground -disturbance activities. If Swainson's hawks are not found to nest within the BSA, then no further action is warranted.

MM BIO-4 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, N o. 18, and No. 19) : If an active Swainson’s hawk nest is discovered at any time within 0.5 mile s of active construction, a qualified biologist shall complete an assessment of the potential for current construction activities to impact the nest. The assessment will consider the type of construction activities, the location of construction relative to the nest, the visibility of construction activities from the nest location, and other existing disturbances in the area that are not related to the construction activities of this Project. Based on this assessment, the biologist shall determine if construction activities can proceed and the level of nest monitoring required. Construction activities shall not occur within 500 feet of an active nest but depending u pon conditions at the site , this distance may be reduced. Full -time monitoring to evaluate the effects of construction activities on nesting Swainson’s hawks may be required. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work if it is determined that Project construction is disturbing the nest. These buffers may need to increase depending on the sensitivity of the nest location, the sensitivity of the nesting Swainson’s hawk to disturbances, and the discretion of the qualified biologist.

MM BIO-5 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, No. 18, and No. 19): If construction is planned outside the nesting period for raptors (other than burrowing owl) and migratory birds (February 1 to August 15), no mitigation shall be required. If construction is planned during the nesting season for migratory birds and raptors, a pre -construction survey to identify active bird nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to evaluate the site and a 250 - foot buffer for migratory birds and a 500 -foot buffer for raptors. If nesting birds are identified during the survey, active raptor nests shall be avoided by 500 feet , and all other migratory bird nests shall be avoided by 250 feet. Avoidance buffers may be reduced if a qualified on-site monitor determines that encroachment into the buffer area is not affecting nest building, the rearing of young, or otherwise affecting the breeding behaviors of the resident birds. Because nesting birds can establish new nests or produce a second or even third clutch at any time during the nesting season, nesting bird surveys shall be repeated every 30 days as construction activities are occurring throughout the nesting season.

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-30 MM BIO-6 (for new Well Sites No. 16, No. 17, No. 18 , and No. 19) : Prior to the initiation of construction activities, all construction personnel shall attend a Worker Environmental Awareness Training program develo ped and presented by a qualified biologist. It shall include the components described below:
a. Information on the life history and identification of special -status species that may occur or that may be affected by Project activities. The program shall also discuss the legal protection status of each such species, the definition of “take” under the FESA and CESA, measures the Project proponent/operator shall implement to protect the species, reporting requirements, specific measures for workers to avoid take of special-status plant and wildlife species, and penalties for violation of the requirements outlined in the CEQA mitigation measures and agency permit requirements.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Impact #3.4.4b – Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. F ish and Wildlife Service?
The Project sites are predominantly highly disturbed and do not provide riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities. The Project is not located within a river or an area that encompasses a river or potential floodplain and d oes not contain nor is near any riparian habitat. There are no anticipated impacts to sensitive natural communities as a result of the proposed Project. The proposed Project would not have any impacts to a riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.4c – Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has regulatory authority over the Clean Water Act (CWA), as provided for by the EPA. The USACE has established specific criteria for the determination of wetlands based on the presence of wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophilic vegetation. There are no federally protected wetlands or vernal pools that occur within the Project site.
152 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-31 Wetlands, streams, reservoirs, sloughs, and ponds typically meet the criteria for federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the CWA and State regulatory authority under the Porter - Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Streams and ponds typically meet the crit eria for State regulatory authority under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. There are no water feature s on any of the Project site s that would meet the criteria for either federal jurisdiction or State regulatory authority. The biological survey did not identify any other non-wetland features within the BSA that would meet the criteria for either federal or State jurisdiction. Accordingly, there are no wetlands or Waters of the U.S. occurring within the BSA of each site. There would be no impact to federally or State protected wetlands or non - wetland waters as a result of the proposed Project. Therefore, the Project would have no impact to federally protected wetlands or waterways or State wetlands or waters.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.4d – Would the Project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Wildlife migratory corridors are described as a linear stretch of land that connects two open pieces of habitat that would otherwise be unconnected. These routes provide shelter and sufficient food resources to support wildlife species during migratory movements.

Movement corridors generally consist of riparian, woodlands, or forested habitats that span contiguous acres of undisturbed habitat and are important elements of resident species’ home ranges.

The majority of the Project sites are within the developed City, which includes existing disturbed areas; the areas surrounding th e Project sites are predominantly developed, and the use of connectivity habitat by sensitive wildlife is highly unlikely. The proposed Project does not occur within the terrestrial migration route, significant wildlife corridor, or wildlife linkage area as identified in the Recovery Plan for Upland Species in the San Joaquin Valley (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1998).

The Project would not substantially affect migrating birds or other wildlife. The Project will not restrict, eliminate, or significantly alter a wildlife movement corridor, wildlife core area, or Essential Habitat Connectivity area, either during construction or after the Project has been constructed. Project construction will not substantially interfere with wi ldlife movements or reduce breeding opportunities.

The proposed Project would not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with an established native resident or migratory wildlife 153 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-32 corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, there would be no impacts to wildlife movements, would not affect movement corridors, or impeded a nursery site.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.4e – Would the Project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? There are no adopted local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources that would apply to the Project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would have no conflict related to adopted local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources , and there would be no impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.4f – Would the Project conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
The Project site is not located within any Natural Community Conservation Plan area or any other local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

154 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-33

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.5 - CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:

a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?

b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?

c. Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?

Discussion
The discussion below is based on the Cultural Resources Technical Memo completed for the Project, attached as Appendix B (QK, 2022).

Impact #3.4.5a – Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? No part of the Project is within the area designated to be historic by the City’s General Plan (City of Wasco, 2016).

A cultural resources records search (#22 -268) was conducted at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center, CSU Bakersfield , to identify previously recorded resources and prior surveys within the Project areas and surrounding half -mile area. The record search indicated that the Well No. 2 site had been included in a previous cultural resources survey.

No resources were identified at the site. One historic cultural resource, the Wasco Union High School Farm (P -15-019048), is located within a half mile of this location. This cultural resource will not be impacted by the implementation of the Project.

None of the remaining Project sites have been surveyed for cultural resources , and it is not known if any exist on them. However, all but the four new well site s have been completely disturbed and include existing water-related infrastructure.

Ten cultural resource studies have been conducted within a half mile of these locations .

Fourteen historic period cultural resources have been identified and recorded within one - half mile of these locations (QK, 2022). None of these 14 cultural resources will be impacted by the construction of the Project.
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
155 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-34 A Sacred Lands File request was also submitted to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). A response dated September 30, 2022, indicates negative results. The NAHC also provided a list of tribes of interest within the Project vicinity. Letters were sent to the tribes with information on the Project, and they were given a 30 -day comment review period. To date, no comments have been received. A copy of that correspondence is included in Appendix B.

Although the components of the Project are within the ex isting disturbed sites, unknown historical resources may be discovered during ground -disturbing activities. In order to account for unanticipated discoveries and the potential to impact previously undocumented or unknown resources, the following mitigation measures are recommended. With the implementation of MM CUL-1 through MM CUL-2, impacts under this criterion would be less than significant with mitigation. With the implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
MM CUL -1: If prehistoric or historic -era cultural materials are encountered during construction activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the find and make recommendations. Cultural resource materials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire -affected rock , as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or stru ctural remnants. If the qualified archaeologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation.

These additional studie s may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation. Implementation of the mitigation measure below would ensure that the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

MM CUL-2: If human remains are discovered during construction or operational activities, further excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The specific protocol, guidelines, and channe ls of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code (Chapter 1492, Statutes of 1982, Senate Bill 297), and Senate Bill 447 (C hapter 44, Statutes of 1987), shall be followed. Section 7050.5(c) shall guide the potential Native American involvement, in the event of a discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Impact #3.4.5b – Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? 156 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-35 See discussion of Impact #3.4.5a above.

The site s have been disturbed previously. The construction of the Project will include shallow trenching to place new piping underground, and some minor grading may be necessary to construct equipment and structures. Although unlikely, there is a chance that trenching and grading activities could unearth previously unknown archaeological resources. Implementation of MM CUL -1 through MM CUL -2 would ensure that potential impacts associated with archaeology during the Project-related activities phase would be less than significant. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
Implementation of MM CUL-1 through MM CUL-2.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Impact #3.4.5c – Would the Project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
There are no known cemeteries or burials on or near the Project. Although unlikely, subsurface construction activi ties, such as trenching and grading, associated with the proposed Project could potentially disturb previously undiscovered human burial sites.

Accordingly, this is a potentially significant impact. Although considered unlikely, subsurface construction act ivities could cause a potentially significant impact to previously undiscovered human burial sites. The cultural resources and Sacred Lands File records searches did not indicate the presence of human remains, burials, or cemeteries within or in the vicinity of the Project site. No human remains have been discovered at the Project site, and no burials or cemeteries are known to occur within the area of the site. However, construction would involve earth -disturbing activities, and it is still possible that h uman remains may be discovered, possibly in association with archaeological sites.

Implementation of mitigation measure MM CUL-2 would ensure that the proposed Project would not directly or indirectly destroy previously unknown human remains. It is unlikely that t he proposed Project would disturb any known human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. With the implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
Implementation of MM CUL-2.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 157 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-36

Discussion
The analyses in this section are based on a Small Project Analysis Level Assessment (Trinity Consultants, 2022) attached as Appendix A.

Impact #3.4.6a – Would the Project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during Project construction or operation?
Construction
Energy demand during the construction phase would result from the transportation of materials, construction equipment, and construction worker vehicle trips . Construction equipment can include tractors, loaded truck s, forklift s, generator s, crane s, roller s, compactors, and an air compressor . The Project would comply with the SJVAPCD requirements regarding the use of fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment to the extent feasible. The Project will not use natural gas during the construction phase. Compliance with standard regional and local regulations would minimize fuel consumption during Project construction.

There are no unusual Project characteristics that would cause construction equipment to be less energy efficient compared with other similar construction sites in other parts of the State. Thus, cons truction-related fuel consumption at the Project would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary energy use.

Operations
The Project facilities will comply with current applicable building code requirements, development standards, and energy efficiency requirements. Equipment used at the facility will be designed to be energy efficient and will not result in unnecessary energy use . The

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.6 - ENERGY
Would the Project:

a. Result in a potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during Project construction
or operation?

b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency?

□ □ □
□ □ □
158 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-37 Project would result in incremental increases in energy consumption due to the new wells being introduced; however, these increases would be offset by the abandoning of Well Nos. 7, 8, 10, and 11 and would result in a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.6b – Would the Project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Energy-saving strategies will be implemented where feasible to reduce the Project’s energy consumption during the con struction and post -construction phases. Strategies being implemented include those recommended by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) that may reduce both the Project’s construction energy consumption, including diesel anti - idling measures, light -duty vehicle technology, usage of alternative fuels such as biodiesel blends and ethanol, and heavy-duty vehicle design measures to reduce energy consumption.

Additionally, as outlined in the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI, the Project includes recommendations to reduce energy consumption by shutting down equipment when not in use for extended periods, limiting the usage of construction equipment to eight cumulative hours per day, usage of electric equipment for construction whenever po ssible in lieu of diesel or gasoline powered equipment, and encouragement of employees to carpool to retail establishments or to remain on-site during lunch breaks.

Based on this analysis, the Project would be consistent and not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan related to renewable energy or energy consumption . Impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

159 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-38

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.7 - GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the Project:

a. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:

i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.

i. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?

ii. iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
iii. liquefaction?

iv. iv. Landslides?

b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?

c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the Project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?

d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18 -1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?

e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems in areas where
sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?

f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?

□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
160 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-39 Discussion
Impact #3.4. 7a(i) – Would the Project Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving – Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geolo gist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Wasco is in a seismically active region but is not at risk for high -magnitude earthquake destruction. The City is in the middle of San Joaquin Valley , which experiences moderate to severe ground shaking. There is a designated Alquist -Priolo Special Studies Zone directly north of Wasco , which is attributed to the Pond -Poso fault. The USGS lists the Pond -Poso fault as capable of experiencing a magnitude of 7, but it has not historically shown greater than a magnitude of 4 in the Pond Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone (City of Wasco, 2016).

The lack of mapped active and potentially active faults notwithstanding, the Project sites could be subjected to strong ground shaking during an earthquake on a nearby fault .

However, no new habitable structures are proposed by the Project.

Water well construction and destruction/abandonment are under the authority of the California Departm ent of Water Resources , and standards are outlined in Bulletin 74 -81 (California Department of Water Resources, 1981) . The wells will be constructed in accordance with the standards as outlined in Chapter II Section 2, including well location siting to limit contamination and pollution from off-site sources, the use of appropriate well casing, the placement and components of seals, the sizing of the well hole and the types of casing materials to use based on soil types, etc. The Project will adhere to the applicable standards as outlined by the State during the construction, rehabilitation and/or destruction of the proposed wells. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

Kern County has also adopted a well ordinance that is under the jurisdiction of the County Public Health Department. The Project will adhere to the applicable Kern County regulations.

Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4. 7a(ii) – Would the Project Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving – strong seismic ground shaking?
See discussion of Impact #3.4.7a(i) above.
161 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-40 There are no known active earthquake faults or Alquist -Priolo fault zones that traverse the City. However, Southern California is considered to be a seismically active area. The City will ensure that all new construction complies with applicable local and State regulations.

The Project shall adhere to all applicable local and State regulations to reduce any potentially significant impacts to structures resulting from strong seismic ground shaking at the Project site. Therefore, Project impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4. 7a(iii) – Would the Project Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving – seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
See discussion of Impact #3.4.7a(i) and (ii) above.

Liquefaction is defined as a phenomenon where earthquake -induced ground vibrations increase the pore pressure in saturated, granular soils until it is equal to the confining, overburdened pressure. When this occurs, the soil can completely lose its shear strength and enter a liquefied state. The possibility of liquefaction is dependent upon grain size, relative density, confining pressure, a saturation of the soils, and intensity and duration of ground shaking. In order for liquefaction to occur, three criteria must be met: “low density,” coarse- grained (sandy) soils, a groundwater depth of less than about 50 feet, and a potential for seismic shaking from nearby large magnitude earthquakes.

Most cities in Kern County are susceptible to adverse secondary effects of seismic activities resulting in ground failure that includes liquefaction (City of Wasco, 2016) . Because the depth of the groundwater at the Project sites is much greater than 50 feet, there is a negligible risk of liquefaction occurring at the Project site during a seismic event.

Based on this analysis, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact exposing people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic -related ground failure , including liquefaction. Adherence to all applicable regulations would reduce or avoid any potential impacts to structures resulting from liquefaction at the Project site, and impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.
162 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-41

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.7a(iv) – Would the Project Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving – landslides? The Project sites are relatively flat with no significant topological features. As such, there is no potential for rock falls or landslides to impact the Project in the event of a major earthquake, as the area has no dramatic elevation changes. The Project will not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury , or death involving landslides. Therefore, the Project will have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.7b – Would the Project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The Project sites and surroundings are mostly flat. Construction activities for the Project may disturb minimal amount s of soils during construction and would expose these disturbed areas to erosion by wind and water. However, since the Project is anticipated to disturb less than one acre of land at each well site , the Project is not subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program requirements. As such, it will not have t o develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). However, the Project would be required to contain all stormwater runoff on-site and implement various types of B est Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent erosion and sedimentation from occurring during construction.

Typical BMPs intended to control erosion include sandbags, silt fencing, swales, street sweeping, etc. The Project is not expected to result in substantial soil erosion or the los s of topsoil with the implementation of the BMPs . Overall, the Project would not result in conditions where substantial surface soils would be exposed to wind and water erosion.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.
163 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-42 Impact #3.4.7c – Would the Project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? See discussion in Impact #3.4.7a(iii) and 3.4.7a(iv) above.

There are no slopes on or near the sites, and the Project would not expose the people or structures to significant risks from landslides.

The proposed Project will comply with all City and State regulations pertaining to construction, including California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Bulletin 74 -81 Water Well Standards and the Wasco Municipal Code. In addition, the City is not in an area that is at high risk for landslides due to the low levels of elevation change (City of Wasco, 2016). Compliance with the existing regulatory framework would be adequate to reduce any potential impacts to less-than-significant levels. Moreover, the Project will be designed by an engineer to resist potential side effects of spreading, subsidence, liquefaction , or collapse.

Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.7d – Would the Project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? The Project includes four new well sites, test wells, and the rehabilitation of three wells. No new habitable structures are proposed. The Project complies with all applicable requirements of the California Code of Regulations, California Department of Water Resources Well Standards, and any pertinent City development standards.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.7e – Would the Project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems in areas where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
164 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-43 The proposed Project does not include septic systems. The Project will not connect to the existing City sewer line or the sewer system for the disposal of other wastewater generated during operations. Therefore, the Project would have no impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.7f – Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
The City’s General Plan FEIR indicates there is potential to discover paleontological resources in the City (City of Wasco, 2016). However, the Project sites have previously had ground-disturbing activities . If further ground-disturbing activities are done during construction, there is a potential impact related to damage to or destruction of previously undiscovered paleontological resources or unique geologic features.

Implementation of MM GEO-2 would reduce potential impacts to a less-than-significant level.

In addition, the Wasco General Plan FEIR policies and guidelines direct the City to require construction to stop immediately if cultural resources, including tribal, archaeological , or paleontological resources, are uncovered during grading or other on -site excavation activities until appropriate mitigation is implemen ted. Therefore, with MM GEO-1, the Project will have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
MM GEO -1: If any paleontological resources are encountered during ground -disturbance activities, all work within 25 feet of the find shall halt until a qualified paleontologist , as defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources (2010), can evaluate the find and make recommendations regarding tr eatment. Paleontological resource materials may include resources such as fossils, plant impressions, or animal tracks preserved in rock. The qualified paleontologist shall contact the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or another appropriate facility regarding any discoveries of paleontological resources.

If the qualified paleontologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant paleontological resource, additional investigations and fossil recovery may be required to miti gate adverse impacts from Project implementation. If avoidance is not feasible, the paleontological resources shall be evaluated for their significance. If the resources are not significant, avoidance is not necessary. If the resources are significant, they shall be avoided to ensure no adverse effects, or such effects must be mitigated. Construction in that area shall not resume until the resource-appropriate measures are recommended, or the materials are determined to be less than significant. If the reso urce is significant and 165 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-44 fossil recovery is the identified form of treatment, then the fossil shall be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution. Copies of all correspondence and reports shall be submitted to the Lead Agency.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 166 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-45

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-than-
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3.4.8 - GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the Project:

a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?

b. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?

Discussion
Impact #3.4.8a – Would the Project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Although construction of the proposed Project would result in temporary emissions of GHGs, the Project as a whole is not expected to generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly , that may have a significant impact on the environment. The Project GHG emissions would be primarily from mobile source activities during construction. Long-term operation of new wells and equipment would not result in the significant generation of GHG emissions.

The Project would not generate cumulatively considerable GHG impacts, nor would it conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The Project will also not conflict with any el ements of the California Air Resources Board’s 2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.8b – Would the Project conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? □ □ □
□ □ □
167 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-46 See Impact #3.4.8a above. The proposed Project will not exceed the SPAL thresholds established by the SJVAPCD. The Project will not cause an exceedance of Kern COG's population growth projection for the City of Wasco and is subject to SJVACPD regulations. As such, the Project is not anticipated to con flict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, and the impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

168 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-47

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.9 - HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS
Would the Project:

a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?

b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?

c. Emit hazardous emissions or involve
handling hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one -
quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?

d. Be located on a site that is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as
a result, would it create a significant hazard
to the public or the environment?

e. For a Project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the Project result
in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the Project
area?

f. Impair implementation of, or physically
interfere with, an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

g. Expose people or structures , either directly
or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss,
injury, or death involving wildland fires?

□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
169 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-48 Discussion
Impact #3.4. 9a – Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Construction of the Project would involve the temporary transport and use of minor quantities of hazardous materials such as fuels, oils, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, paints , and solvents. The types and quantities of hazardous materials to be used and stored on-site would not be of a significant amount to create a reasonably foreseeable upset or accident condition. The handling and transport of all hazardous materials on-site would be performed in accordance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations. State Route (SR) 43 and SR 46 would be the main Hazardous Materials Shipping Routes that would be utilized during the construction and operation of the Project (Kern County, 2009). There are City-adopted procedures and guidelines to prevent and minimize hazardous emergencies throughout all stages of construction and operation of the Project.

Construction
Small amounts of h azardous and non -hazardous materials and wastes would likely be transported to and from the Project site during the construction phase of the proposed Project. Construction would involve the use of some hazardous materials, such as diesel fuel, hydraulic oil, grease, solvents, adhesives, paints, and other petroleum-based products. These materials are commonly used during construction activities and would be removed and disposed of at an appropriate landfill or recycling facility . Workers would likely be trained to properly identify and handle all hazardous materials, following OSHA/CAL -OSHA regulations. Hazardous waste would be either recycled or disposed of at a permitted and licensed treatment and/or disposal facility. Any hazardous waste or debris that is generated during the construction of the proposed Project would be collected and transported away from the site and disposed of at an approved off -site landfill or another such facility While they are being used during construction, these materials are stored in appropriate storage locations and containers in the manner specified by the manufacturer and disposed of in accordance with local, federal, and State regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Operations
During operation, personnel will perform a routine visual inspection of all water -related infrastructure, including wells, tanks, pipelines, and pumps. Employees will comply with all City adopted safety procedures in order to prevent and minimize leaks or spills. If applicable, Safety Data Sheets will be posted for each chemical used that will include precautionary statements for each chemical, first aid measures, firefighting measures, accidental release measures, handl ing and storage, exposure controls, physical and chemical properties, stability and reactivity, disposal considerations, and transport information.

The goal of the Project is to filter and mix water that will meet State MCL thresholds for 1,2,3- -TCP and nitrates . In some instances, water will go through a GAC filtration process to 170 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-49 remove these chemical constituents . Effluent water from the GAC system will be taken and disposed of at an appropriate Class II nonhazardous materials landfill. No residuals will be released into the City’s sewer system. Once operational, it is also expected that the Project will require the transport, use, or disposal of minimal amounts of typical hazardous materials such as oil, diesel fuel, cleaners, etc . These materials will be stored and handled following the appropriate safety procedures. The Project’s potential to create significant hazards to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4. 9b – Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
See the discussion on Impact #3.4.9a above.

There are no active Geologic Energy Management Division ( CalGEM) identified oil or gas fields in the Project vicinities, and there are no known existing or historical oil wells on the Project site s (CalGEM, 2022) . Consequently, it i s not expected that any wells would be impacted by the Project. Therefore, the Project impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.9c – Would the Project emit hazardous emissions or involve handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
See Impacts #3.4.9a and b above.

The schools within a quarter mile of any Project components are shown below in Table 3.4.9-

1. 171 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-50 Table 3.4.9-1
Schools in Project Vicinity
Project Component Nearest School and Distance
Well 15 Early Ed Wasco H Street Child Development – 0.11 miles Wasco Demonstration Child Care – 0.22 miles
Early Ed Wasco 6th Street Child Development Center – 0.27 miles Well 10 James A. Forrest School – 0.1 miles
Well 7 Wasco High School – 0.1 miles
Well 8 Palm Avenue School – 0.2 miles

Construction activities of the proposed Project will result in the temporary use of hazardous materials and or substances, such as lubricant and diesel fuel, during construction. Exhaust from construction and related activities is expected to be minimal and would not create a significant impact. Once constructed, the operation of the Project components would not be considered hazardous. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.9d – Would the Project be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? An online search was conducted to identify hazardous waste locations on or near the Project site. The search indicated that there are nine hazardous or toxic sites within the City of Wasco (EnviroStor, 2022). Of the nine sites, only one is active – Santa Fe Railroad property at 7th Street and H Street which is 0.13 miles southwest of Well No. 15. However, there are no habitable structures proposed for the site, and City staff would only be on site during routine maintenance activities; construction activities would be of short duration. Therefore, the implementation of the Project would not expose co nstruction or City employees to hazardous materials.

Available data indicates there is one open cleanup site in Wasco at 541 SR 46 (GeoTracker, 2022). This site is more than a half mile from any of the Project components. The cleanup site will not be impacted by the construction or operation of the Project and would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

The Project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites with the City’s General Plan FEIR (City of Wasco, 2016) and would not impact a listed site. There is no data identifying any facilities in the vicinity that might reasonably be anticipated to emit 172 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-51 hazardous air emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or wastes that might affect the proposed residential development . Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.9e – For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety haza rd or excessive noise for people residing or working in the Project area?
The Wasco-Kern County airport is approximately 0.5 miles west of Well No. 12 but is not within a half mile of any of the other Project sites. Well No. 12 is the only component within the airport influence area and is within the B-1 Zone, as identified in the Kern County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALCUP) (County of Kern, 2012). The B-1 Zone does not restrict or prohibit the construction and operation of governmental utilities or infrastructure such as well. However, none of the proposed Project sites, including Well No. 12 , are within an identified noise contour zone. Therefore, the Project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people working in the Project area and there would be a less -than- significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be a less-than-significant impact.

Impact #3.4.9f – Would the Project impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The 2022 Kern County Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) establishes an emergency management organization and assigns functions and tasks consistent with California’s Standardized Emergency Management System and the National Incident Management System. The EOP includes goals and a framework for implementing effective emergency response (County of Kern, 2022). The Project will comply with all local regulations as stated in the EOP. The Project would also comply with the appropriate local and State requirements regarding emergency response plans and access. The proposed Project would not inhibit the ability of local roadways to continue to accommodate emergency response and evacuation activities. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact. 173 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-52

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.9g – Would the Project Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? According to available data from Cal Fire, the entire City of Wasco, including the Project site, is within a Local Responsibility Area (LRA) (Cal Fire, 2007) . The General Plan includes policies that would protect the Project and the community from fire dangers that would be followed during the construction and operation of the Project.

Construction activities and the Project operation are not expected to increase the risk of wildfires on and adjacent to the Project site s. The Project will comply with all applicable State and local standards as required by local fire codes . Therefore, the Project would have less-than-significant impacts.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.
174 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-53 Discussion
The analyses in this section are based in part on a Feasibility Analysis Report prepared for the Project (Dee Jaspar and Associates, Inc., 2022) attached as Appendix C.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.10 - HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Would the Project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface water quality?

b. Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the Project
may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?

c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:

i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on-
or off-site?

ii. Substantially increase the rate of amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would
result flooding on- or off-site?

iii. Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or

iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?

d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to Project
inundation?

e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
a water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?

□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
175 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-54 Impact #3.4.10a – Would the Project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface water quality? The proposed Project construction and groundbreaking activities have the potential to cause erosion, sedimentation, and discharge of construction debris from the Project sites. Clearing of vegetation and grading activities, for example, could lead to exposed or stockpiled soils susceptible to peak stormwater runoff flows. Also, the compaction of soils by heavy equipment may minimally reduce the infiltration capacity of soils (exposed during construction) and increase runoff and erosion potential. Demolition activities and the presence of significant amounts of raw materials for construction, including concrete, asphalt, and slurry, may lead to stormwater runoff contamination. If uncontrolled, these materials could lead to water quality problems, including sediment-laden runoff, prohibited non-stormwater discharges, and ultimately the degradation of downstream receiving water bodies. Implementing BMPs for construction activities , such as the use of straw waddle sandbags, silt fencing, swales, street sweeping, etc., will be implemented and would reduce stormwater runoff to a less-than-significant impact during construction activities.

As proposed, the Project will require minimal grading or other ground-disturbance activities that could cause soil erosion or sedimentati on that would degrade water surface quality.

Sites having existing water-related infrastructure that is being upgraded/rehabilitated are already clear of vegetation, and no grading will be necessary. The sites for the proposed four new wells (No 15 throug h No 18) are all one acre or less in size and will require minimal grading or ground disturbance ; thus, the potential for issues related to soil erosion or contaminated runoff is unlikely with implementation of standard BMPs . The Project’s surface or groun dwater water quality impacts are expected to be less than significant because water quality would improve as a result of the Project.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4. 10b – Would the Project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
One of the primary purposes of the propos ed Project is to improve current water quality conditions to meet State standards. The proposed Project would achieve compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act and State Water Resources Control Board standards for providing the residents of Wasco safe, c lean drinking water. Currently, the water from the wells exceeds the maximum contaminant levels for 1, 2, 3 -TCP and nitrate. The proposed Project has been analyzed and, with implementation, has been determined to bring drinking water quality within acceptable contaminant ranges.
176 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-55 The Shafter -Wasco Irrigation District is a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) and abides by the Kern Groundwater Sustainability Plan (KGSP) as required by Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) . The City extracts water from the Kern County Groundwater Subbasin as its sole water source. The Kern River is the primary groundwater recharge source , and a rtificial recharge also occurs at nearby groundwater recharge facilities. The Kern County Groundwater Subbasin is bordered by Kern, King, and Tulare Counties to the North, the Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi Mountains to the east and southeast, and the San Emigdio Mountains and Coast Ranges to the south and southwest (City of Wasco, 2016).

The proposed Project will improve the existing water quality by replacing wells with high levels of contaminants that exceed State thresholds . The replacement of the wells will not cause a decrease in existing groundwater supplies as they would supply the same amount of water as the existing wells. The water pumps and tanks, water treatment systems, and the rehabilitation of Well No. 2 will not impact groundwater or increase water demand.

Therefore, the Project will not impact groundwater levels or the production rates of local wells. As such , the Project's impact to groundwater recharge is considered to be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.10c(i) –Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
The disturbance of soils on-site during construction that could cause erosion is minimal but may result in temporary construction impacts. Impacts from construction and operation are discussed below.

As discussed in Impact #3.4.10a above, potential impacts on water quality arising from erosion and sedimentation are expected to be localized and temporary during construction.

Construction-related erosion and sedimentation impacts as a result of soil disturbance would be less than significant. There are no water bodies present on the Project site, and therefore, the proposed Project would not change the course of any such drainages.

Existing drainage patt ern of the site and area would be affected by Project development because of the increase in impervious surfaces at the site. However, there will be a small addition in impervious surfaces ( tanks, pads, etc.), which could increase the potential for stormwater runoff and soil erosion. The construction of the Project includes drainage 177 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-56 systems that will be connected to the City storm drainage system. The Project will comply with DWR Bulletin 74 -81 and local regulations in order to minimize impacts during construction and post-construction of the Project. The Project will not alter a stream or river.

With implementation of BMPs, erosion or siltation on- or off-site is less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.10c(ii) – Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would substantially increase the rate of amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result flooding on- or off-site? See also Impact #3.4.10c(i) above.

The Project sites do not contain any water features, streams , or rivers. Existing drainage pattern of the site and area would be affected by Project development because of the increase in impervious surfaces at the site. However, there will be an addition of minimal impervious surfaces (tanks, pads, etc.), which could increase the potential for stormwater runoff and soil erosion. All Project components will comply with the City of Wasco Municipal Code, Chapter 15 on-site stormwater retention standards. Stormwater will be maintained on -site or be allowed to percolate to the ground. The minimal amount of new impervious surfaces is not expected to substantially increase the rate of water runoff in a manner that results in flooding.

Once constructed, stormwater would either percolate to the ground or be maintained on site.

The Project would not cause substantial surface runoff that would result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, with mitigation, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.10c(iii) – Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 178 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-57 Please see Impacts #3.4.10a through c(ii) above.

All Project components will comply with the City of Wasco Municipal Code, Chapter 15 on- site stormwater retention standards. Impacts would be less than significant.

The Project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on - or off-site, contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, nor provide additional sources of polluted runoff. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.10c(iv) – Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows?
Project-related activities of the Project would include soil -disturbing activities that could result in erosion and siltation, as well as the use of harmful and potentially hazardous materials required to operate vehicles and equipment.

As discussed in Section #3.4.4 b and 3.4.4c, there were no wetlands, Waters of the U.S. , or water features identified on the various Project sites. The various Project components are anticipated to be developed on relatively flat land and would not significantly alter existing drainage patterns or the course of a stream or river. Except for proposed Well No. 15, the Project components are not located within a flood hazard area. All Project components will comply with the City of Wasco Municipal Code, Chapter 15 on-site stormwater rete ntion standards and would not impede or redirect flood flows.

Therefore, the Project will have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.10d – Would the Project, in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to Project inundation?
179 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-58 See Impact #3.4.10c(ii).

The Project site is not located near the ocean or a steep topographic feature (i.e., mountain, hill, bluff, etc.). Tsunamis are waves generated in oceans from seismic activity. Due to the inland location of the site, tsunamis are not considered a hazard for the site. Therefore, there is no potential for the site to be inundated by tsunami or mudflow.

A seiche is a wave generated by the periodic oscillation of a body of water whose period is a function of the resonant characteristics of the containing basin as controlled by its physical dimensions. There is no body of water within the vicinity of the Project site. There is no potential for the inundation of the Project site by seiche.

The Kern County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) identifies dams and levees throughout Kern County and their potential hazard classification. Figure 4 -24 of the Kern County MJHMP indicates dam inundation exposure at the Lake Isabella dam (Kern County, 2020) . Per Figure 4 -24, the City of Wasco is located outside of the inundation exposure zone. Additionally, Figure 4 -25 identifies levees within Kern County and shows that the City of Wasco is not likely to be impacted due to levee failure. Impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.10e – Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
See the response to Impact #3.4.10b above.

The Project would improve the well water quality. The Project will comply with all applicable local and State standards during construction and operation. This Project is not anticipated to use or substantially deplete groundwater supplies or conflict with any future adopted groundwater management plan. Therefore, this Project will have a less -than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.
180 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-59

Discussion
Impact #3.4.11a – Would the Project physically divide an established community? The Project sites are either existing City -owned property that supports water -related infrastructure, or they are undeveloped property. The proposed Project sites would not create a division between any established communities. The proposed Project would not physically divide an established community. Therefore, the Project will have no impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.1 1b – Would the Project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
The City intends to change the current land use designation and zone district of the Well No. 17 property from R-1-6 to P-F. This will allow the City to utilize the property to develop the well as well as other city -related facilities. The change in land u se will ensure consistency between the intended land use and the land use designation.

The Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and does not create a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation. As such, the proposed Project would not conflict with any

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.11 - LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the Project:

a. Physically divide an established
community?

b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?

□ □ □
□ □ □
181 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-60 applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project.

Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

182 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-61

Discussion
Impact #3.4.1 2a – Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? The California Department of Conservation, Geological Survey classifies lands into Aggregate and Mineral Resource Zones (MRZs) based on guidelines adopted by the California State Mining and Geology Board, as mandated by the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1974.

These MRZs identify whether known or inferred significant mineral resources are present in areas. Lead agencies are required to incorporate identified MRZs resource areas delineated by the State into their General Plans. The State has not identified any mineral resource zones within the Wasco planning area (City of Wasco, 2016).

As discussed in Impact # 3.4.9b, t he Project sites are not located in an identified CalGEM oilfield, and there are no known wells located on the sites. The proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of mineral resources as the Project does not propose the extraction of mineral resources. Additionally, the proposed Project would not restrict the ability of mineral rights holders in the area to exercise their legal rights to access surrounding sites for the exploration and/or extraction of underlying oil research or other natural resources.

The proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.12 - MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:

a. Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?

b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?

□ □ □
□ □ □
183 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-62

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.12b – Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
The proposed Project is not designated as a mineral recovery area (City of Wasco, 2016) .

The Project would not alter any existing plans that protect mineral resources. As a result, the proposed Project would not interfere with known mining operations but would not result in the loss of land designated for mineral and petroleum.

The proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

184 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-63

Discussion
Impact #3.4.1 3a – Would the Project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in a local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies?
The General Plan provides direction for the noise environment for the Project and identifies the policy for land uses that may generate noise and sensitive land uses that may be affected by noise generated elsewhere. The General Plan Policy is to provide noise considerations in the land use decision-making process.

The existing major sources of noise within the City are SR 43, SR 46, and railroad operations.

The closest Project site is approximately 0.5 miles away from SR 46 and SR 43. According to the General Plan’s Existing Railroad Noise Contour Map, the Project is currently within Noise Level 70 dBA CNEL (City of Wasco, 2016).

Construction-related noise levels and activities will be temporary and intermittent. The proposed Project will generate noise from the following construction equipment: well drill equipment, tractor, loaded truck, forklifts, generator, crane, paver, roller, compactor, and an air compressor. Additionally, traffic and the various other noises generally associated with

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.13 - NOISE
Would the Project result in:

a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the Project in excess of
standards established in a local general plan
or noise ordinance or applicable standards
of other agencies?

b. Generation of excessive ground -borne
vibration or ground-borne noise levels?

c. For a Project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the Project expose people
residing or working in the Project area to
excessive noise levels?

□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
185 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-64 construction activities will be temporary and only take place during daylight hours. In addition, the construction-related noise will be intermittent and cease once the proposed Project is completed. Based on the anticipated work and equipment use, Table 3.4.13 -1 below reveals a 90 A-weighted decibels (dBA) contour of construction and operation activities. The farthest contour is at 92 feet and is associated with well -drilling activities.

Once well drilling is completed, noise generation is anticipated to result in minimal increases in ambient noise from pumps and other equipment. However, the closest sensitive receptor is near proposed Well No. 16, which will be at least 100 feet away from residences. The highest noise levels associated with the Project would occur during well drilling. Well drilling is expected to generate noise levels of 90 dBA at a distance of 92 feet from the equipment source.

Table 3.4.13-1
Attenuation Distances from Project Noise Sources to 90 dBA Noise Contour Scenario Distance (feet)
Land Preparation 83
Well Drilling 92
Well Workover 81

Although noise levels exceeding the 90 dBA threshold for Project development and operation would not extend beyond the well site boundaries , implementation of Mitigation Measure MM NSE-1 will ensure the temporary noise impacts from construction-related activities will be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
MM NSE-1: During construction, the contractor shall implement the following measures:
a. All stationary construction equipment on the Project site shall be located so that noise-emitting objects or equipment face away from any potential sensitive receptors.
b. The construction contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is equipped with manufacturer-approved mufflers and baffles. During construction, stationary constru ction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers.
c. Construction activities shall take place during daylight hours, when feasible.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Impact #3.4.1 3b – Would the Project result in generation of excessive ground -borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels?
186 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-65 Construction
Construction activities, in general, can have the potential to create ground-borne vibrations.

It is unlikely that any blasting or pile -driving would be required in connection with the construction of the Project. Construction activities most likely to cause vibration include heavy construct ion equipment and drilling. Therefore, the potential for ground -borne vibrations to occur as part of the construction of the Project is considered minimal.

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has published standard vibration velocities for construction equipment operations (Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S.

Department of Transportation, 2017). In general, the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations (i.e., 0.2 inch/second) appears to be conservative even for sustained pile driving. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural. Ordinary buildings that are not particularly fragile would not experience any cosmetic damage (e.g., plaster cracks) at distances beyond 30 feet. This distance can vary substantially depending on the soil composition and underground geological layer between the vibration source and receiver.

In a ddition, not all buildings respond similarly to vibration generated by construction equipment. The typical vibration produced by construction equipment is illustrated in Table

3.4.13-2.

Table 3.4.13-2
Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment
Equipment
Reference peak particle
velocity at 25 feet
(inches/second)1
Approximate peak particle
velocity at 100 feet
(inches/second)2
Loaded trucks 0.076 0.010
Vibratory
compactor/roller

0.210 0.026
Notes:
1 – Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006. Table 12-2. 2 – Calculated using the following formula:

PPV equip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5
where: PPV (equip) = the peak particle velocity in inches/second of the equipment adjusted for the distance PPV (ref) = the reference vibration level in inches/second from Table 12-2 of the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines
D = The distance from the equipment to the receiver

As indicated in Table 3.4.13-2, based on the FTA data, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment that would be used during Project construction range from 0.076 to

0.210 inch-per-second peak particle velocity (PPV) at 25 feet from the source of activity.

With regard to the proposed Project, ground-borne vibration would be generated during site clearing activities on -site facilitated by implementation of the proposed Project. As demonstrated in Table 3.4-13-2, vibration levels at 100 feet would range from 0.010 to 0.026 PPV. Therefore, the anticipated vibration levels would not exceed the 0.2 inch -per-second PPV significance threshold during construction operations at the n earest receptors, which 187 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-66 are approximately half a mile to the west. It should be noted that 0.2 inch-per-second PPV is a conservative threshold, as that is the construction vibration damage criteria for non - engineered timber and masonry buildings (Kern County Planning Department, 2013) .

Buildings within the Project area would be better represented by the 0.5 inch -per-second PPV significance threshold (construction vibration damage criteria for reinforced concrete, steel, or timber buildings) (Kern County Planning Department, 2013). Therefore, vibration impacts associated with construction are anticipated to be less than significant.

Operation
Once constructed, the Project would not result in any activities that would create ground- borne vibrations. The Project is near the railroads, which are a common source of ground - borne vibration and intermittent noise exposure. However, the General Plan FEIR states the railway does not generate noise in excess of 80VdB, which is the FTA standard (City of Wasco, 2016) . The Project would be operated without the need for on-site employees.

Routine maintenance and emergency repairs would be the only likely scenario that would require on-site employees but would be temporary in nature. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in the exposure of persons to sensitive receptors or generat e excessive ground-borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels. Therefore , the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.13c – For a Project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels?
There are no private airstrips or airstrip land use plans within the city limits. The Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

188 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-67

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.14 - POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the Project

a. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes an d
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?

b. Displace substantial numbe rs of existing
people or housing, necessi tating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?

Discussion
Impact #3.4.14a – Would the Project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for e xample, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? According to the 2017 -2021 American Community Survey, the City of Wasco has an estimated total population of 27,505. 86 percent of the population of the City is Hispanic or Latino, 6.3 percent is white, 0.9 percent is Asian and Pacific Islander, 5.5 percent is black, and

0.3 is American Indian or Alaska Native (U.S. Census Bureau, 2021a).

The median household income in the City is $40,532, compared with a median household income of $69,717 in the United States. Approximately 20.7 percent of the families in the City have incomes below the poverty level, compared with 9.1 percent in the United St ates (U.S.

Census Bureau, 2021b; U.S. Census Bureau, 2021c). The unemployment rate in the City was

4.3 percent compared with 3.9 percent for the United States (U.S. Census Bureau, 2021d) .

As of November 2022, California’s unemployment rate is 4.1 percent (State of California Employment Development Department, 2022).

The proposed Project would not induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through the extension of roads or other infrastructure) . The Project would not introduce new housing or infrastructure. Therefore, there would be no impacts to the Project. □ □ □
□ □ □
189 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-68

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.1 4b – Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? See Impact#3.4.14a above.

Any construction needed for the Project would likely be done by existing City employees or construction workers residing in the City or the surrounding area, which would not require new housing. The Project sites will not displace existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, the Project would have no impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

190 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-69

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.15 - PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the Project:

a. Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times, or to other
performance objectives for any of the public
services:

i. (i) Fire protection?

ii. (ii) Police protection?

iii. (iii) Schools?

iv. (iv) Parks?

v. (v) Other public facilities?

Discussion
Impact #3.4.1 5a(i) – Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or to other performance objectives for any of the public services - Fire Protection? Fire protection for the Project is provided by the Kern County Fire Department. The County maintains Fire Station 31 at 2424 7 th Street in Wasco . The station is staffed with three personnel every day. The station houses a Type 1 Fire Engine, a Type 4 Patrol Unit, and a Type 1 Office of Emergency Services Water Tender. The average response time is less t han 10 minutes (City of Wasco, 2016).

The construction and operation of the proposed Project is not expected to increase the risk of fires on and adjacent to the Project site. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant.
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
191 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-70

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.1 5a(ii) – Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the constru ction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or to other performance objectives for any of the public services – Police Protection? The Kern County Sheriff’s Department prov ides law enforcement services to the City of Wasco. The Wasco substation is located at 748 F Street in Wasco and is located approximately a half mile from the Project site. The substation is staffed by 25 officers (two sergeants, 18 deputies, four senior d eputies, and the area commander), six clerks, and an aide who handles the civil process (City of Wasco, 2016).

The Project will not increase the local population and would not result in significant environmental impacts related to acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives of police protection services. Therefore, impacts related to police protection would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.1 5a(iii) – Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental fac ilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or to other performance objectives for any of the public services – Schools? The Project is within the Wasco Union Elementary School District (District), which includes five school facilities , and the Wasco Union High School District, which includes two school facilities that service the City. The Project will not increase the population or require changes to the school facilities. Therefore, the Project will not impact the local school district.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.
192 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-71

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
There would be no impact.

Impact #3.4.15a(iv) – Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or to other performance objectives for any of the public services – Parks? According to the City of Wasco’s Urban Greening, Parks, and Open Space Mast er Plan, there are six acres of existing neighborhood parks and 41 acres of existing community parks (City of Wasco, 2016). The proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks. The proposed Project would not result in an increase in the local population.

The proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regiona l parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the envi ronment.

Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.1 5a(v) – Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or to other performance objectives for any of the public services – Other Public Facilities?
See Impact #3.4.15a above.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.
193 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-72

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.16 - RECREATION
Would the Project:

a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?

b. Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational
facilities that might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?

Discussion
Impact #3.4.16a – Would the Project Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
The proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and re gional parks. The proposed Project would not result in an increase in the local population .

Therefore, the Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. There will not be physical deterioration of the facilities, and the Project will not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities .

Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.1 6b – Would the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
See Impact #3.4.16a above.
□ □ □
□ □ □
194 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-73 The Project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that would have any adverse physical effect on the environment.

There would be a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

195 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-74 Discussion
Impact #3.4.1 7a – Would the Project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
The existing roadways providing the main circulation in the vicinity of the Project include the following as designated under the City of Wasco General Plan Circulation Element:
• SR 46 is a highway and serves as the main east/west thoroughfare. • SR 43 is a highway and serves as the main north/south thoroughfare for the City.

Access to Well 12 is located along McCombs Road, west of SR 43. • J Street is a truck route. Access to the Well 15 would be taken from J Street. In the vicinity of the Project , J Street is developed as a two -lane roadway with curb and gutter.
• Central Avenue is a n arterial. Central Avenue south of SR 46 is improved or w ill be improved with Class II bikeways. Proposed Wells 16, 17, and 18 will take access from Central Avenue.

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Evaluation
The new CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) was adopted in December 2018 by the California Natural Resources Agency. These revisions to the CEQA Guidelines criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts are primarily focused on projects

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.17 - TRANSPORTATION
Would the Project:

a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?

b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?

c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?

d. Result in inadequate emergency access?

□
□
□
□ □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
196 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-75 within transit priority areas and shift the focus from driver delay to a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, creation of multimodal networks, and promotion of a mix of land uses. Vehicle miles traveled, or VMT, is a measure of the total number of miles driven to or from a development and is sometimes expressed as an average per trip or per person.

The newly adopted guidance provides that a Lead Agency may elect to be governed by the provisions of this section immediately. Beginning on July 1, 2020, the provisions of this section shall apply Statewide. To date, the City has not yet formally adopted transportation significance thresholds or transportation impact analysis procedures. Since the regulations of SB 743 have not been finalized or adopted by the City, traffic delay remains the measure used to determine the significance of a traffic impact. Therefore, impacts related to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) would be less than significant.

Development of the Project sites is required to comply with City standards for driveway development. Construction-related traffic is anticipated to be short -term and would not significantly impact existing or planned circulation infrastructure. The proposed operation of the Project does no t require on-site employees and would have minimal impact on the City’s circulation system. The proposed Project will not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle , and pedestrian facilities, and would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.1 7b – Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
See Impact #3.4.17a above.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.1 7c – Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
197 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-76 The Project will not include any changes to any design features that could create a hazard.

Therefore, the Project will have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.17d – Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? The proposed Project would be required to comply with all emergency access requirements adopted and set forth in the City of Wasco Municipal Code. Project site development will be required to comply with applicable emergency access standards from local and State authorities.

As described above, increased Project-related traffic would not cause a significant increase in congestion and or significantly worsen the existing service levels at intersections on area roads; therefore, Project-related traffic would not affect emergency access to the Project site or any other surrounding location s. The proposed Project would not require closures of public roads, which could inhibit access by emergency vehicles. For these reasons , construction and operation would have a less-than-significant impact on emergency access.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

198 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-77

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.18 - TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:

a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code Section
21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe, and that is:

i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or

ii. A resource determined by the Lead Agency, in
its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivisio n (c) of
Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the
Lead Agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
tribe.

Discussion
The discussion below is based on the Cultural Resources Technical Memo completed for the Project, attached as Appendix B (QK, 2022).

Impact #3.4.1 8a(i) – Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is – listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?
See the discussion presented in Section 3.4.5 - Cultural Resources, Impacts #3.4.5a through

3.4.5c.
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
199 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-78 On August 16, 2022, pursuant to Public Resources Code §21080.3.1 and Government Code §65300 et seq, letters were sent to each of the Native American tribes within the geographic area as identified by the NAHC (see Appendix B). The letters included a Project description and location maps. To date, no response s have been received from the tribes that were contacted.

Upon any ground-breaking activity, there is the possibility of uncovering an object of cultural value. Mitigation Measures MM CUL-1 and MM CUL-2 must be implemented if any artifacts or human remains are discovered. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM CUL-1 and MM CUL-2.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Impact #3.4.1 8a(ii) – Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native Ameri can tribe, and that is – a resource determined by the Lead Agency , in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 50 24.1, the Lead Agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? See discussion for Impacts #3.4.5a through#3.4.5c and Impact #3.4.18a(i) above.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM CUL-1 and MM CUL-2.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

200 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-79

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.19 - UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

Would the Project:

a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment , or stormwater
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?

b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?

c. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider that serves or may serve
the Project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the Project’s Projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?

d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?

e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?

Discussion
This analysis relied upon a review of applicable requirements of the California Region al Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) and the Wasco General Plan.

Impact #3.4.19a – Would the Project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
The Project is for the development of new wells, improvement of existing wells , and water infrastructure that will be constructed at various sites throughout the City. Additionally, four □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
201 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-80 existing wells are planned to be abandoned once the construction of the Project is complete.

The proposed new water wells would be subject to applicable State and local standards for well drilling , including Kern County well drilling and abandoning requirements. The proposed well sites will connect to the City’s existing water distribution system. With the compliance of State and local regulations for well development and water quality, the development of the Project would not result in a significant environmental effect . The Project sites would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities.

The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) provides electricity to the City. The Project will connect to existing PG&E transmission lines. The Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wast ewater treatment, stormwater drainage, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities. As a result, the Project is considered to be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.19b – Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
The City provides domestic water from six active wells out of nine (two wells are inactive , and another only provides irrigation water for the Valley Rose Golf Course) (City of Wasco, 2016). The City estimates water use demand to be 6,661 AFY in 2015 and would increase to 17,397 AFY by 2035. The City of Wasco General Plan indicates that the combined capacity of water wells is 15,476 AFY. The Project intends to drill new wells, improve existing wells, and build support infrastructure that will continue to meet the needs of the City and its residents.

The City’s water conservation program, the “No Waste” Ordinance , assists in ensuring a reliable water supply that meets federal, State, and local standards. Other planned infrastructure projects listed in the City of Wasco General Plan would allow the City to continue to provide a reliable water supply for its service area. Compliance of the Project with the Kern Groundwater Authority Groundwater Sustainabil ity Plan (GSP) would also ensure sustainable groundwater suppl y goals are met. With consideration of the City’s efforts for water conservation and groundwater recharge, in addition to compliance with applicable State and GSP requirements, the Project’s purpose for meeting the City’s current and future potable water demands would have less -than-significant impacts on available water supplies and would be sufficient for foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years.
202 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-81

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.19c – Would the Project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s Projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? See Impact #3.4.19a and b.

The proposed Project does not include the construction of habitable structures . Therefore, there will be no increase in wastewater, and the Project would have no impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less-than-significant impact.

Impact #3.4.1 9d – Would the Project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Implementation of the proposed Project would not increase the demand for solid waste disposal. During temporary construction, unused construction materials, which are not anticipated to contain hazardous materials, would be collected and transported away f rom the site.

Solid waste that is collected during construction will be disposed of at the Shafter/Wasco Landfill and the Bakersfield Metropolitan (Bena) Landfill. These landfills are owned and operated by the Kern County Waste Management Department. The Shafter/Wasco Landfill is the City’s primary landfill, while the Bena Landfill accepts some refuse from industrial uses within the City. Both of these facilities are designated as Class III landfills and have the capacity to serve projected solid waste di sposal needs through December 2053 and April 2046, respectively (CalRecycle, 2020). As noted previously, residual water or byproducts of the filtration process will be taken and disposed of at an appropriate Class II nonhazard ous materials landfill. Once operational, the Project would not generate municipal waste.

The Project, in compliance with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, would dispose of all waste generated on-site at an approved solid waste facility.

The Project does not and would not conflict with federal, State, or local regu lations related 203 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-82 to solid waste. The proposed Project would be served by a landfill with a sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the Project’s solid waste disposal needs in compliance with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less-than-significant impact.

Impact #3.4.19e – Would the Project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? See discussion for Impact #3.4.19d.

As stated above, the Wasco-Shafter Landfill has the available capacity to accommodate solid waste generated by the proposed Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would not be expected to significantly impact K ern County landfills. The proposed Project would be required to comply with all federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would result in a less-than- significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

204 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-83

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.20 - WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the Project:

a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose Project occupants to, pollutant
concentration from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines
or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk
or that may result in temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?

d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?

Discussion
Impact #3.4.20a – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
See also Impact #3.4.9f regarding emergency response.

The City of Wasco is not within close proximity to High Fire Hazard Zones (City of Wasco, 2016).

As noted previously, Kern County Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) establishes emergency procedures and policies and identifies responsible parties for emergency response in the County (County of Kern, 2022) . The EOP includes policies that would prevent new development from interfering with the emergency response of evacuation plans. The Project □ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
205 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-84 will adhere to the standards set forth in the City of Wasco Municipal Codes. The Project would also comply with the appropriate local and State requirements regarding emergency response plans and access. The proposed Project would not inhibit the ability of local roadways to continue to accommodate emergency response and evacuation activities.

The proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.20b – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wi ldfire risks, and thereby expose Project occupants to, pollutant concentration from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? The Project will be constructed and operated in existing developed areas. The City’s General Plan does not identify the Project site as an area with a high fire threat (City of Wasco, 2016).

The Project area s are generally flat. Prevailing winds in the City typically occur from the northwest at an a verage speed of five to 10 miles per hour (City of Wasco, 2016) . By implementing State and local fire code requirements , the Project would not exacerbate the risk of exposure of Project occupants to wildfire. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.20c – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fi re risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
See Impacts # 3.4.9a and g, #3.4.20a and b above.
206 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-85 The Project is not located near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones . The site is not within 350 feet of high -voltage transmission lines.

Based on available data, the nearest electric transmission line is along SR 46 (California Energy Commission, 2020) . The Project would not require the installation or maintenance of additional distribution lines. Therefore, the Project would not exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment, and impacts would be less than significant.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact #3.4.20d – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post- fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
See Impacts # 3.4.9a and g, #3.4.20a, b, and c above.

The Project is not located near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. The City and the Project sites are topographically flat land. There are no slopes on or near the property, and the Project would not expose the people or structures to significant risks from downslope or downstream flooding or landslides due to a result of runoff, post-fire instability, or drainage changes.

Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
No mitigation is required.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts would be less than significant.

207 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-86

Discussion
Impact #3.4. 21a – Does the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, subs tantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
As evaluated in this IS/MND, the proposed Project would not substantially d egrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; reduce the number or restric t the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species; or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. With implementation of the mitigation measures recommended in this

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-than-
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.4.21 - MANDATORY FINDINGS OF

SIGNIFICANCE

a. Does the Project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self -sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?

b. Does the Project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a
Project are significant when viewed in
connection with the effects of past Projects,
the effects of other current Projects, and the
effects of probable future Projects.)

c. Does the Project have environmental effects
that would cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?

□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
208 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-87 document, the proposed Project would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, significantly impact biological resources , or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California 's history or prehistory. Therefore, with the following mitigation measures, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO -1 through MM BIO-6 and MM CUL-1 and MM CUL-2.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
The Project would have a less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated.

Impact #3.4. 21b - Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a Project are significant when viewed in connection wi th the effects of past Projects, the effects of other current Projects, and the effects of probable future Projects.)? As described in the impact analyses in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4. 20 of this IS/MND, any potentially significant impacts of the proposed Project would be reduced to a less -than- significant level following the incorporation of the mitigation measures listed. The proposed Project would not otherwise combine with impacts of r elated development to add considerably to any cumulative impacts in the region. With mitigation, the proposed Project would not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable.

Therefore, the Project would have a less -than-cumulatively-considerable impact with mitigation incorporated.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO -1 and MM BIO-6, MM CUL -1 through MM CUL-2, MM GEO-1, MM NSE-1.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
The Project would have a less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated.

Impact #3.4.21c - Does the Project have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? All of the Project’s impacts, both direct and indirect that are attributable to the Project were identified and mitigated. The Project mitigation measures will substantially reduc e or eliminate the impacts of the Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would not either directly or indirectly cause substant ial adverse effects on human beings because all potentially adverse direct impacts of the proposed Project are identified as having no impact, less-than-significant impact, or less-than-significant impact with mitigation. 209 of 676
Initial Study

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3-88

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO -1 and MM BIO-6, MM CUL -1 through MM CUL-2, MM GEO-1, and, MM NSE-1.

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
The Project would have a less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated. 210 of 676
List of Preparers

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 4-1 SECTION 4 - LIST OF PREPARERS
Lead Agency- City of Wasco
• Scott Hurlbert- City Manager
• Maria Lara- Assistant City Manager

Consultants –
QK
• Jaymie Brauer – Project Manager QA/QC
• Thomas Kobayashi – Lead Author
• Robert E. Parr, MS, RPA– Cultural and Tribal Resources Trinity Environmental Consultants (Air Quality)
• Matt Daniel – Senior Consultant

Dee Jaspar and Associates, Inc (Feasibility Analysis)
• Curtis Skaggs, PE

211 of 676
Bibliography

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 5-1

SECTION 5 - BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cal Fire. (2007). Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. Retrieved from https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6686/fhszl06_1_map15.pdf CalGEM. (2022). Well Finder . Retrieved from
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#openModal/- 119.33373/35.59403/14
California Department of Conservation. (2022). California Important Farmland Finder .

Retrieved from https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ California Department o f Transportation. (2023). California Scenic Highway Mapping System.

California Department of Water Resources. (1981). Water Well Standards: State of California.

California Energy Commission. (2020). California Electric Transmission Lines . Retrieved from https://cecgis -caenergy.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/california-electric- transmission-line?geometry=-119.354%2C35.593%2C-119.300%2C35.605 California Native Plant Society. (2020). Rare Plant Inventory . Retrieved from http://rareplants.cnps.org/
CalRecycle. (2020). Retrieved from CalRecycle:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/15-AA-0273/Detail/ City of Wasco. (2016). 2040 General Plan.

City of Wasco. (2016). Wasco General Plan - Final EIR.

County of Kern. (2012). Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.

County of Kern. (2022). Emergency Operations Plan.

Dee Jaspar and Associates, Inc. (2022). Feasibility Analysis Report for a Water Treatment Strategy for the City’s Water Supply – Amendment No. 1.

EnviroStor. (2022). EnviroStor. Retrieved from DTSC:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=wasco%2C+ca Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation. (2017).

Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Guidance. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environMent/noise/regulations_and_guidance/. 212 of 676
Bibliography

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 5-2 GeoTracker. (2022). CA Waterboards . Retrieved from GeoTracker:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=wasco %2C+ca#
Kern County. (2009). General Plan.

Kern County. (2020). County of Kern, Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Kern County Planning Department. (2013). Lerdo Jail- Justice Facility Project Enviromental Impact Report- Noise Section 4.11.

QK. (2022). Cultural Technical Memorandum- Wasco New Water Well Project.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. (2015). Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts.

State of California Employment Development Department. (2022, December). California's unemployment rate rose to 4.1 percent for Nov. 2022 . Retrieved from State of California Employment Development Daprtment:
https://edd.ca.gov/en/about_edd/news_releases_and_announcements/unemploym ent-november-2022/
Trinity Consultants. (2022). Small Project Analysis Level Assessmen t- CIty of Wasco Well Project.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2021a). U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey . Retrieved from U.S. Census Bureau:
https://data.census.gov/table?q=Wasco+city,+California&tid=ACSDP5Y2021.DP0 5 U.S. Census Bureau. (2021b). U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey . Retrieved from U.S. Census Bureau:
https://data.census.gov/table?q=Wasco+city,+California+household+income&tid =ACSST5Y2021.S1901
U.S. Census Bureau. (2021c). U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey . Retrieved from U.S. Census Bureau:
https://data.census.gov/table?q=United+States+unemployment&tid=ACSDP1Y20

21.DP03
U.S. Census Bureau. (2021d). U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey . Retrieved from U.S. Census Bureau:
https://data.census.gov/table?q=United+States+unemployment&tid=ACSDP5Y20

21.DP03
US Fish and Wildlife Service. (1998). Recovery Plan for Upland Species of the San Joaquin Valley, CA.
213 of 676
Bibliography

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 5-3 US Fish and Wildlife Service. (2022). List of Endangered Species . Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/endangered/

214 of 676
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

City of Wasco January 2023
Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 6-1 SECTION 6 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 215 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 1 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
Aesthetics
No Mitigation required.

Agriculture and Forest Resources
No Mitigation required.

Air Quality
No Mitigation required.

Biological Resources
#1 BIO-1 (for new well sites No. 15, No. 16, No. 17, and No. 18): Within 14 days prior to the start of Project ground-disturbing activities, a pre- construction survey with a 500 -foot buffer, where land access is permitted, shall be conducted by a qualified biologist knowledgeable in the identification of special status species such as San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF), burrowing owl (WEBO), etc. If dens/burrows/nests that could support any of these s pecial-status species are discovered during the pre -construction survey, the avoidance buffers outlined below shall be established, and den or burrow monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012) and USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance.

If any burrowing owl burrows are observed during the
preconstruction survey, avoidance measures shall be consistent with those included in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012). If occupied burrowing owl burrows are observed outside of the breeding season (September 1 through January 31) and within 250 feet o f proposed construction activities, a passive relocation effort may be instituted in accordance with the guidelines established by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2012). During the Within 14 days prior to
any construction-
related activities.

Lead Agency, Qualified
Biologist; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, if
necessary; and California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife if necessary.

Steps to Compliance:

A. A qualified biologist shall be responsible for a preconstruction survey.

B. If necessary, the qualified biologist shall contact CDFW and USFWS to determine next steps.

C. If necessary, the qualified biologist shall implement next steps in consultation with the wildlife agencies.

D. The qualified biologist shall prepare a brief report to be submitted to the wildlife agencies within 5 days of completion of the preconstruction survey.

E. Lead Agency shall verify compliance.
216 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 2 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
breeding season (February 1 through August 31), a 500 -foot (minimum) buffer zone shall be maintained unless a qualified biologist verifies through noninvasive methods that either the birds have not begun egg laying and incubation or that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.

Den(s) or burrow(s) may be monitored using trail cameras or tracking medium such as diatomaceous earth. If no species are detected for a minimum of four consecutive days/nights, the den or burrow may be burrow-scoped and plugged with a filled sandbag under the direct supervision of a qualified and approved by CDFW biologist. All tunnels must be examined for animal presence before plugging with a sandbag to ensure no burrowing owls, kit foxes, or other animals are hiding inside.

No work shall occur within these buffers unless the biologist approves and monitors the activity. A copy of the pre -construction survey report shall be submitted to the lead agency as evidence of compliance.

SJKF
Potential or Atypical den – 50 feet
Known den – 100 feet
Natal Den –Contact CDFW for consultation
#2 BIO-2 (: The following avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented during all phases of the Project to reduce the potential for impact from the Project. They are modified from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered SJKF Prior to or Dur ing Ground Disturbance (USFWS 2011, Appendix F).

All phases Lead Agency, Project
operators, contractors

Steps to Compliance:

A. The measures listed are to be followed while Project is implemented.

I I I
I I I
217 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 3 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
a. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in securely closed containers. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in securely closed containers and removed at least once a week from the construction or Project site.
b. Construction-related vehicle traffic shall be restricted to established roads and predetermined ingress and egress
corridors, stagin g, and parking areas. Vehicle speeds shall not exceed 20 miles per hour (mph) within the Project site. c. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit fox or other animals during construction, the contractor shall cover all excavated, steep-walled holes or trenc hes more than two feet deep at the close of each workday with plywood or similar materials. If holes or trenches cannot be covered, one or more escape ramps constructed of earthen fill or wooden planks shall be installed in the trench. Before such holes or trenches are filled, the contractor shall thoroughly inspect them for entrapped animals.

All construction-related pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored on the Project site shall be thoroughly insp ected for wildlife before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in anyway. If at any time an entrapped or injured kit fox is discovered, work in the immediate area shall be temporarily halted and USFWS and CDFW shall be consulted.
d. Kit foxes are attracted to den -like structures such as pipes and may enter stored pipes and become trapped or injured. All construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater that are stored at a construction site for one or more overnight periods shall be thoroughly inspected for kit foxes before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or B. A pre-construction survey shall be sent to the Lead Agency.

I I I
218 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 4 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
otherwise used or moved in any way. If a kit fox is discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved unti l the USFWS and CDFW have been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved only once to remove it from the path of construction activity, until the fox has escaped.
e. No pets, such as dogs or cats, shall be permitted on the Project sites to prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes, or destruction of dens.
f. Use of anti-coagulant rodenticides and herbicides in Project sites shall be restricted. This is necessary to prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit foxes and the depletion of prey populations on which they depend. All uses of such compounds shall observe label and other restrictions mandated by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and other State and Federal legislation, as well as additional Project -related restrictions deemed necessary by the USFWS and CDFW. If rodent control must be conducted, zinc phosphide shall be used because of the proven lower risk to kit foxes.
g. A representative shall be appointed by the Project proponent who will be the contact source for any employee or contractor who might inadvertently kill or injure a kit fox or who finds a dead, injured or entrapped kit fox. The representative shall be identified during the employee education program and their name and telephone number shall be provided to the USFWS.
h. The Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office of USFWS and CDFW shall be notified in writing within three working days of the accidental death or injury to a SJKF during Projec t-related activities. Notification must include the date, time, and location of the incident or of the finding of a dead or injured animal and I I I
219 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 5 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
any other pertinent information. The USFWS contact is the Chief of the Division of Endangered Species, at the add resses and telephone numbers below. The CDFW contact can be reached at (559) 243-4014 and [email protected].
i. All sightings of the SJKF shall be reported to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). A copy of the reporting form and a topographic map clearly marked with the location of where the kit fox was observed shall also be provided to the Service at the address below.
j. Any Project -related information required by the USFWS or questions concerning the above conditions, or their
implementation may be directed in writing to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at: Endangered Species Division, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W 2605, Sacramento, California 95825 -1846, phone:
(916) 414-6620 or (916) 414-6600.
k. New sightings of SJKF should be reported to the CNDDB.

#3 BIO-3 (for new well sites No. 15, No. 16, No. 17 and No. 18): If all Project activities are completed outside of the Swainson’s hawk nesting season (February 15 through August 31), this mitigation measure does not apply.

Nesting surveys for the Swainson’s hawks shall be conducted in accordance with the protocol outlined in the Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in
California’s Central Valley (CDFG 2000). If potential Swainson’s hawk nests or nesting substrates are located within 0.5 miles of the Project site, then those nests or substrates must be monitored for activity on a routine and repeating basis throughout the breeding season, or until Swainson’s hawks or other raptor species are verified to be using them. The protocol recommends that the following visits be made to each nest or nesting site: one visit during Before construction if
initiated during nesting
season (February 15 to
August 31)
Lead Agency, Project
operators, contractors

Steps to Compliance:

A. If ground -disturbing activities are anticipated to be completed during Swainson’s hawk nesting season, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey.

B. The qualified biologist shall prepare a brief report to be submitted to the wildlife agen cies within 5 days of completion of the preconstruction survey.

220 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 6 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
January 1–March 20 to identify potential nest sites, three visits during March 20–April 5, three visits during April 5–April 20, and three visits during June 10–July 30. A fewer number of visits may be permissible if deemed adequate by the City after consultation with a qualified biologist. To meet the minimum level of protection for the species, surveys shall be completed for at least the two survey periods immediately prior to Project-related ground disturbance activities. If Swainson's hawks are not found to nest within the BSA, then no further action is warranted.
#4 BIO-4: If an active Swainson’s hawk nest is discovered at any time within 0.5 mile of active construction, a qualified biologist shall complete an assessment of the potential for current construction activities to impact the nest. The assessment will consider the type of construction activities, the location of construction relative to the nest, the visibility of construction activities from the nest location, and other existing disturbances in the area that are not related to construction activities of this Project. Based on this assessment, the biologist shall determine if construction activities can proceed, and the level of nest monitoring required. Construction activities shall not occur within 500 feet of an active nest but depending upon conditions at the site this distance may be reduced. Full-time monitoring to evaluate the effects of construction activities on nesting Swainson’s hawks may be required. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work if it is determined that Project construction is disturbing the nest. These buffers may need to increase depending on the sensitivity of the nest location, the sensitivity of the nesting Swainson’s hawk to disturbances, and at the discretion of the qualified biologist

Active construction
during nesting season
(February 1 to
September 15)
Lead Agency, Project
operators, contractors

A. If an active nest is discovered, the qualified biologist shall prepare an assessment.

B. If active nests are found during the survey or at any time during construction of the Project, an avoidance buffer ranging of 500 feet may be required, with the avoidance buffer from any specific nest being determined by a qualified biologist.

C. Work is to c ontinue under approval and guidance of qualified biologist.
221 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 7 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
#5 BIO-5 (for new well sites No. 15, No. 16, No. 17, and No. 18): If construction is planned outside the nesting period for raptors (other than burrowing owl) and migratory birds (February 1 to August 15), no mitigation shall be required. If construction is planned during the nesting season for migratory birds and raptors, a preconstruction survey to identify active bird nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to evaluate the site and a 250-foot buffer for migratory birds and a 500-foot buffer for raptors. If nesting birds are identified during the survey, active raptor nests shall be avoided by 500 feet and all other migratory bird nests shall be avoided by 250 feet.

Avoidance buffers may be reduced if a qualified on-site monitor determines that encroachment into the buffer area is not affecting nest building, the rearing of young, or otherwise affecting the breeding behaviors of the resident birds. Because nesting birds can establish new nests or produce a second or even third clutch at any time during the nesting season, nesting bird surveys shall be repeated every 30 days as construction activities are occurring throughout the nesting season.

No construction or earth-moving activity shall occur within a non- disturbance buffer until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the young have fledged (left the nest) and have attained sufficient flight skills to avoid Project construction areas. Once the migratory birds or raptors have completed nesting and young have fledged, disturbance buffers will no longer be needed and may be removed, and monitoring may cease.

Before construction if
initiated during nesting
season (February 1 to
September 15)
Lead Agency, Project
operators, contractors

A. A preconstruction nesting bird survey shall be conducted within 14 days prior to the start of construction.

B. If active nests are found during the survey or at any time during construction of the Project, an avoidance buffer ranging from 50 feet to 500 feet may be required, with the avoidance buffer from any specific nest being determined by a qualified biologist.

C. Work is to continue under approval and guidance of qualified biologist.
#6 BIO-6 (for new well sites No. 15, No. 16, No. 17, and No. 18): Prior to the initiation of construction activities, all construction personnel Prior to construction Project proponent, Lead
Agency

222 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 8 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
shall attend a Worker Environmental Awareness Training program developed and presented by a qualified biologist. It shall include the components described below:
a. Information on the life history and identification of special-status species that may occur or that may be affected by Project activities. The program shall also discuss the legal protection status of each such species, the definition of “take” under the FESA and CESA, measures the Project proponent/operator shall implement to protect the species, reporting requirements, specific measures for workers to avoid take of special-status plant and wildlife species , and penalties for violation of the requirements outlined in the CEQA mitigation measures and agency permit requirements.

A. The Project contractor shall ensure all construction workers complete the Worker Environmental Awareness Training program which shall be viewed prior to construction.

Cultural Resources
#7 CUL-1: If prehistoric or historic-era cultural materials are encountered during construction activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the find and make recommendations. Cultural resource m aterials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock, as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural remnants. If the qualified archaeologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation. Implementation of the mitigation measure below would ensure that the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. In the event cultural resources are discovered, the archaeologist will notify the agencies.

During construction Lead Agency, Project
operators, contractors

Steps to Compliance:

A. If necessary, work shall cease and the project proponent shall retain a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist to assess finds and recommended procedures.

B. The qualified cultural resources specialist shall assess the significance of the find and determine next steps.

C. The Lead Agency shall verify compliance.

I I I
I I I
223 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 9 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
#8 MM CUL-2: If human remains are discovered during construction or operational activities, further excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The specific protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage
Commission, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code (Chapter 1492, Statutes of 1982, Senate Bill 297), and Senate Bill 447 (Chapter 44, Statutes of 1987), shall be followed. Section 7050.5(c) shall guide the potential Native American involvement, in the event of discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner.

During construction and
operational activities
Lead Agency, Project
operators, contractors

A. If necessary, work shall cease and the project proponent shall retain a qualified archaeologist to assess finds and recommended procedures.

B. The qualified cultural resources specialist shall assess the significance of the find and determine next steps.

C. The Lead Agency shall verify compliance.

Energy
No Mitigation required.

Geology and Soils
#9 GEO-1: If any paleontological resources are encountered during ground disturbance activities, all work within 25 feet of the find shall halt until a qualified paleontologist as defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources (2010), can evaluate the find and make recommendations regarding treatment. Paleontological resource materials may include resources such as fossils, plant impressions, or animal tracks preserved in rock.

The qualified paleontologist shall contact the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or other appropriate facility regarding any discoveries of paleontological resources.

Steps to Compliance:

A. The Project proponent shall retain a qualified paleontologist if a paleontological resource is potentially identified during ground - disturbing activities.

B. The qualified paleontologist shall asses the significance of the find and determine next steps.

C. The Lead Agency shall verify compliance.
224 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 10 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation. If avoidance is not feasible, the paleontological resources shall be evaluated fo r their significance. If the resources are not significant, avoidance is not necessary. If the resources are significant, they shall be avoided to ensure no adverse effects, or such effects must be mitigated.

Construction in that area shall not resume unti l the resource appropriate measures are recommended or the materials are determined to be less than significant. If the resource is significant and fossil recovery is the identified form of treatment, then the fossil shall be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution. Copies of all correspondence and reports shall be submitted to the Lead Agency.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
No Mitigation required.

Hazardous Materials
No Mitigation required.

Hydrology and Water Quality
No Mitigation required.

Land Use and Planning
No Mitigation required.

Mineral Resources
No Mitigation required.

Noise
#10 NSE-1: During construction, the contractor shall implement the following measures:
a. All stationary construction equipment on the Project site shall be located so that noise emitting objects or equipment faces away from any potential sensitive receptors.
b. The construction contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is equipped with manufacturer-approved mufflers and During construction Lead Agency, Project
contractors

Steps to Compliance:

1. Project proponent shall implement the listed measures during construction of the Project.

I I I
I I I
225 of 676
Draft Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program January 2023 Water System Improvement and Treatment Project Page 11 of 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame for
Implementation
Responsible Monitoring
Agency Date Initials
baffles. During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers.
c. Construction activities shall take place during daylight hou rs, when feasible.

Population and Housing
No Mitigation required.

Public Services
No Mitigation required.

Recreation
No Mitigation required.

Traffic and Transportation
No Mitigation required.

Tribal Cultural Resources
Implement Mitigation Measures MM CUL-1 and MM CUL-2.

Utilities and Service Systems
No Mitigation required.

Wildfire
No Mitigation required.

I I I
226 of 676

APPENDIX A

SMALL PROJECT ANALYSIS LEVEL

227 of 676

SMALL PROJECT ANALYSIS LEVEL ASSESSMENT

Water System Improvement & Treatment Project
Wasco, California

Prepared For:

QK, Inc.
5080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309

Prepared By:

TRINITY CONSULTANTS
4900 California Avenue, Suite 420A
Bakersfield, CA 93309
661.282.2200

December 2022

Project 220505.0197

228 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1

1.1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 1-1

1.2 Statement of Finding ................................................................................................ 1-1

2. PROJECT INFORMATION 2-1

2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2 Project Location ........................................................................................................ 2-1

3. SMALL PROJECT ANALYSIS LEVEL QUALIFICATION 3-1

4. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS THRESHOLDS AND EVALUATION METHODOLGY 4-1

4.1 SJVACPD Significance Criteria ................................................................................... 4-1

4.2 Thresholds for Ambient Air Quality Impacts ............................................................. 4-2

4.3 Thresholds for Hazardous Air Pollutants ................................................................... 4-2

5. PROJECT-RELATED EMISSIONS 5-1

5.1 Short-Term Criteria Pollutant Emissions ................................................................... 5-1

5.2 Long-Term Criteria Pollutant Emissions .................................................................... 5-2

5.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................ 5-2

5.4 Potential Impacts to Visibility to Nearby Class 1 Areas ............................................. 5-2

5.5 Potential Odor Impacts ............................................................................................. 5-2

5.6 Ambient Air Quality Impacts ..................................................................................... 5-3

5.7 Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) Impacts ....................................................................... 5-3

5.8 Potential Impact on Sensitive Receptors .................................................................. 5-5

6. CONCLUSIONS 6-1

7. REFERENCES 7-1
APPENDIX A. PROPOSED PROJECT PLAN 7-1
APPENDIX B. CALEEMOD EMISSIONS ESTIMATES OUTPUT FILES B-1 APPENDIX C. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODELING FILES C-1

229 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants i

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1. Industrial Projects SPAL Reference Sizes 3-1 Table 4-1. SJVAPCD Air Quality Thresholds of Significance - Criteria Pollutants 4-1 Table 4-2. Measures of Significance – Toxic Air Contaminants 4-2 Table 5-1. Construction Emissions 5-1
Table 5-2. Total Project Operational Emissions 5-2
Table 5-3. Potential Maximum Impacts Predicted by HARP 5-4

230 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 1-1

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Executive Summary
Trinity Consultants has completed a limited air quality assessment for the City of Wasco’s Water System Improvement and Treatment Project. The Project consists of the installation of four new wells, rehabilitation of one existing well, installation of a granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment vessel, a new 1,000,000- gallon storage tank, installation of an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) System, updates to the City’s SCADA system and the abandonment of 4 existing wells. This project (Project) will be located in Wasco, California and a map of the various project areas can be found in Appendix A.

This limited air quality assessment uses the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s (SJVAPCD) screening tool, Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL)1. This assessment was prepared pursuant to the SJVAPCD’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI)2, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000 to 21189) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 – 15387).

1.2 Statement of Finding
Based on the thresholds established by the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI, the emissions estimates prepared pursuant to this limited air quality assessment do not exceed the SJVAPCD’s established emissions thresholds and significance thresholds for all CEQA air quality determinations; this Project would therefore not pose a significant impact to the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin and would have a less than significant air quality impact.

1 SJVAPCD, 2020, http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI-SPAL.PDF. 2 SJVAPCD, 2015, https://www.valleyair.org/transportation/GAMAQI.pdf. 231 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 2-1

2. PROJECT INFORMATION

2.1 Introduction
The Project site is located in the community of Wasco, California. The Water System Improvement & Treatment Project includes drilling four new municipal water wells to replace existing water supply wells that exceed the State of California MCL for 1,2,3-TCP and occasionally for Nitrate. The proposed wells (Well No. 15, Well No. 16, Well No. 17, Well No. 18) will undergo a test well phase will involve the drilling of four test water wells and is anticipated to involve approximately 9 months. Next a production well drilling phase will involve the drilling of four municipal water wells and is anticipated to involve approximately 12 months.

Finally, the well equipping and site development phase will involve the equipping of four municipal water wells and is anticipated to involve approximately 24 months.

The existing City Well No. 12 has 1,2,3-TCP that exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL). The City will install granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment to remove 1,2,3-TCP from the raw water. The estimated time from installation of the GAC vessels to being fully operational is 11 months. Additionally, the existing Well No. 2 has been out of service and inoperable for several years; however, the City intends to rehabilitate this well and utilize it for potable water service. The work includes replacing the vertical turbine pump, vertical hollow shaft electric motor, well discharge piping, hydropneumatics tank, electrical and controls. The estimated time to rehabilitate Well No. 2 is 16 months. The project will also include the construction of a 1.0 MG storage tank and booster pump station near proposed wells 15, 17, and at the southeast corner of Poso Drive and Wasco Avenue and is anticipated to be completed within a 11-month period.

An Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) System will be installed throughout the City to remotely collect customer water usage data in real time for each of the water service meters. This will include the installation of a meter interface unit at each service meter throughout the City and the wireless transmission of data to the City via a fixed network. Finally, the existing City SCADA system will be modified and updated to include the above noted water system improvements including, but not limited to the four new water well facilities, new 1.0 MG storage tanks and booster pumping stations, the Well No. 12 1,2,3-TCP treatment, and the rehabilitation of Well No. 2. Upon completion of the project, the existing City Wells that are being replaced – Well No. 7, No. 8, No. 10, and No. 11 will be abandoned of all pump equipment, piping, electrical, and appurtenances. The wells will be abandoned by filling with concrete and performing all work in accordance with County of Kern requirements.

2.2 Project Location
The Project is located in the city of Wasco, California. Proposed Well No. 15 One of the well sites will be located on the northwest corner of J Street and 9th Street. Well No. 16 will be located on the southwest corner of Poso Drive and Martin Street. Well No. 17 will be located on the southeast corner of Central Avenue and Filburn Avenue. Well No. 18 will be located on the northwest corner of Central Avenue and Margalo Street. The granular activated charcoal vessels will be installed at the site of the existing City Well No. 12 which is located on the south side of McCombs Road. Rehabilitation of the existing City Well No. 2 will occur at the site located on the north side of Highway 46 and west of Leonard Avenue. A storage tank and booster pumping station will be constructed at the Booth Property located south of Poso Drive and east of Wasco Avenue. A map of the listed locations along with the proposed well abandonment sites can be found in Appendix A.

232 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 3-1

3. SMALL PROJECT ANALYSIS LEVEL QUALIFICATION
This assessment was prepared pursuant to the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI2, the CEQA (Public Resources Code 21000 to 21189) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 – 15387). The SJVAPCD created the SPAL screening tool to streamline air quality assessments of commonly encountered projects. According to GAMAQI, the SJVAPCD “pre-calculated the emissions on a large number and types of projects to identify the level at which they have no possibility of exceeding the emissions thresholds”3.

The SJVAPCD SPAL process established review parameters to determine whether a project qualifies as a “small project.” A project that is found to be “less than” the established parameters has “no possibility of exceeding criteria pollutant emissions thresholds”1. The Project is predominantly construction related, as it is an upgrade to an existing Drinking Water Distribution System, and the operations are limited to maintenance of the well and tank sites, including pumps and generators. Due to the nature of the Project, “User Defined Industrial” land use was used in CalEEMod. Table 3-1 presents the industrial project sizes that are “deemed to have a less than significant impact on air quality”2.

Table 3-1. Industrial Projects SPAL Reference Sizes
Land Use
Category – Industrial
Project Size
(square feet)*
ADT One-Way for
all Fleet Types
(except HHDT)
ADT One-Way for
HHDT Trips Only
General Light Industry 280,000
550 70 Heavy Industry 900,000
Industrial Park 295,000
Manufacturing 472,000
Proposed Project** 67,780 1 0
SPAL Exceeded? No No No
*Project size based on SPAL Table 4(a)(b), as posted on SJVAPCD webpage:
https://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI-SPAL.PDF **Proposed Project size includes the estimated area where construction activities will take place (2 x 1024 square feet) and square footage of piping trenching (3.9 miles of pipe with a 6ft wide trench).

3 SJVAPCD GAMAQI, Section 8.3.4, Page 85.
233 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 4-1

4. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS THRESHOLDS AND EVALUATION

METHODOLGY

4.1 SJVACPD Significance Criteria
Significance thresholds are based on the CEQA Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form (not included herein) and SJVAPCD air quality thresholds4. A potentially significant impact to air quality, as defined by the CEQA Checklist, would occur if the project caused one or more of the following to occur:

► Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; ► Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard; ► Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; and/or ► Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

The SJVAPCD has identified quantitative emission thresholds to evaluate the potential air quality impacts of a project. Emissions exceeding the established significance thresholds would be considered to have a significant impact if not adequately mitigated to below the thresholds. The SJVAPCD air quality thresholds from the GAMAQI are presented in Table 4-1

4. The SJVAPCD separates construction emissions from
operational emissions, and further separates permitted operational emissions from non-permitted operational emissions, for determining significance thresholds for air pollutant emissions.

Table 4-1. SJVAPCD Air Quality Thresholds of Significance - Criteria Pollutants Pollutant/Precursor
Construction
Emissions
Operational Emissions
Permitted Equipment
and Activities
Non-Permitted
Equipment and Activities
Emissions (tpy) Emissions (tpy) Emissions (tpy)
CO 100 100 100
NOx 10 10 10
ROG 10 10 10
SOx 27 27 27
PM10 15 15 15
PM2.5 15 15 15
Source: SJVAPCD 2015

Criteria pollutant emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2020.4.0

5. This project would generate short-term construction criteria pollutant emissions. There will be no increase in long-term operational criteria pollutant emissions as this project is a replacement for an existing well, installation of a water tank, and all associated equipment will be electric.

4 SJVAPCD, 2015, 0714-GAMAQI-Criteria-Pollutant-Thresholds-of-Significance.pdf (valleyair.org). 5 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), 2021. 234 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 4-2

4.2 Thresholds for Ambient Air Quality Impacts
CEQA Guidelines – Appendix G (Environmental Checklist) states that a project that would “violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation” would be considered to create significant impacts on air quality. The EPA has established the Federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program to determine what comprises “significant impact levels” (SIL) to NAAQS attainment areas. A project’s impacts are considered less than significant if emissions are below PSD SIL for a particular pollutant. When a SIL is exceeded, an additional “increment analysis” is required. The PSD SIL thresholds are used with ambient air quality modeling for a CEQA project to address whether the Project would “violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.” Ambient air quality emissions estimates below the PSD SIL thresholds would result in less than significant ambient air quality impacts for both a project and cumulative CEQA impact analysis. The SJVAB is classified as non-attainment for the O
3 NAAQS and, as such, is subject to “non-attainment new source review” (NSR). PSD SILs and increments are more stringent than the CAAQS or NAAQS and represent the most stringent thresholds of significance. As the Project would not include modification to the stationary source under NSR, it would not be subject to either PSD or NSR review.

4.3 Thresholds for Hazardous Air Pollutants
GAMAQI recommends that Lead Agencies consider situations wherein a new or modified source of TACs is proposed for a location near an existing residential area or other sensitive receptor when evaluating potential impacts related to TACs.

The SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI states, “From a health risk perspective there are basically two types of land use projects that have the potential to cause long-term public health risk impacts:

► Type A Projects: Land use projects that will place new toxic sources in the vicinity of existing receptors, ► Type B Projects: Land use projects that will place new receptors in the vicinity of existing toxics sources”
6 Table 4-2 presents the thresholds of significance used with toxic air contaminants when evaluating toxic air contaminants (TACs).

Table 4-2. Measures of Significance – Toxic Air Contaminants Agency Level Description
Significance Thresholds Adopted for the Evaluation of Impacts Under CEQA

SJVAPCD
Carcinogens Maximally Exposed Individual risk equals or exceeds 20 in one million.

Non-Carcinogens
Acute: Hazard Index equals or exceeds 1 for the Maximally Exposed Individual.

Chronic: Hazard Index equals or exceeds 1 for the Maximally Exposed Individual.

Source: SJVAPCD 2015

6 SJVAPCD, 2015, http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/0714-GAMAQI-TACs-Thresholds-of-Significance.pdf. 235 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-1

5. PROJECT-RELATED EMISSIONS
This document was prepared pursuant to the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI and SPAL guidelines and provides a cursory review of the Project emissions to demonstrate that it would not exceed established air quality emissions thresholds.

5.1 Short-Term Criteria Pollutant Emissions
Table 5-1 shows the construction-related emission levels based on the anticipated construction timeline, equipment needed and default emission factors for said equipment. While the construction of the project is anticipated to span an approximate 4.5-year period, several of the project components will be constructed concurrently and the estimated working construction days for each phase is summarized below:

► Test Well Phase: 35 Days
► Production Well Construction: 30 Days
► Production Well Drilling: 30 Days
► Well Equipping and Site Development: 200 Days
► Installation of GAC Vessels: 80 Days
► Rehabilitation of Well No. 2: 100 Days
► Installation of 1.0 MG Storage Tank: 27 Days
► Well Abandonments: 44 Days

Construction emission estimates also included the following options available in the model to reduce PM10 emissions in compliance with Air District Regulation VIII requirements:

► Water exposed area 3 times per day; and
► Reduce vehicle speed to less than 15 miles per hour.

Based on these anticipated activity levels, the Project construction activities would not exceed construction- related criteria pollutant thresholds (Table 4-1). Therefore, construction emissions were found to be less than significant, and no further evaluation is required.

Table 5-1. Construction Emissions
Emissions Source Pollutant
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
2023 Construction 0.137 0.890 1.128 0.002 0.053 0.041
2024 Construction 0.164 1.499 1.802 0.004 0.110 0.067
2025 Construction 0.102 0.912 1.117 0.002 0.079 0.042
2026 Construction 0.030 0.274 0.330 0.001 0.013 0.011
2027 Construction 0.069 0.584 0.756 0.002 0.025 0.023
Maximum (tons/year) 0.164 1.499 1.802 0.004 0.110 0.067 Maximum (pounds/day) 5.377 49.138 59.072 0.142 3.616 2.187 SJVAPCD Construction Emissions
Thresholds (tons/year) 10 10 100 27 15 15
Is Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No

236 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-2

5.2 Long-Term Criteria Pollutant Emissions
Long term emissions are caused by operational mobile, area, and stationary sources. The only long-term emissions from this Project would be from maintenance trips which are already required for the existing wells along with a minimal incremental increase in electricity usage from the water tank’s booster pump.

There will be emergency generators located at Well No. 15, Well No. 16, Well No. 17, and Well No. 18.

Therefore, the proposed Project’s long-term air quality emissions are expected to not pose a significant impact to criteria air pollutants.

Table 5-2. Operational Emissions
Emissions Source Pollutant
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Operational Emissions (pounds/day) 3.9272 12.6378 8.7626 0.0166 0.5063 0.5063 Operational Emissions (tons/year) 0.7167 2.3064 1.5992 0.0030 0.0924 0.0924 SJVAPCD Operational Emissions
Thresholds – non-permitted sources 10 10 100 27 15 15
Is Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No

As calculated (see Appendix B), the long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed Project would be less than SJVAPCD significance threshold levels and would, therefore, not pose a significant impact to criteria air pollutants. This finding is consistent with the SPAL screening thresholds.

5.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The Project’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are primarily from mobile source activities during construction and energy usage during operations. The short-term construction GHG emissions will not have a significant impact and there are no new long-term operation GHG emissions as the project is a replacement of the existing facilities water pump and installation of a storage tank. Therefore, the Project is considered less than significant for GHG emission impacts.

5.4 Potential Impacts to Visibility to Nearby Class 1 Areas It should be noted that visibility impact analyses are not usually conducted for area sources. The recommended analysis methodology was initially intended for stationary sources of emissions which were subject to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements in 40 CFR Part 60. Since the Project’s emissions are predicted to be significantly less than the PSD threshold levels, an impact at either the Dome Land Wilderness or the Sequoia National Park Areas (the two nearest Class 1 areas to the Project) is extremely unlikely. Therefore, based on the Project’s predicted emissions, the Project is not expected to have any adverse impact to visibility at any Class 1 Area.

5.5 Potential Odor Impacts
The proposed Project is additional wells and water tank located near residential neighborhoods. Expected uses are not known to be a source of nuisance odors and are not listed in Table 6 of the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI

7. The Project is therefore not anticipated to have substantial odor impacts. The Project is therefore anticipated to have a less than significant odor impact.

7 SJVAPCD GAMAQI, Section 8.6, Table 6, Page 103.
237 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-3

5.6 Ambient Air Quality Impacts
As stated in the of GAMAQI8, SJVAPCD has developed screening levels for requiring an Ambient Air Quality Analysis (AAQA). The SJVAPCD recommends that an AAQA be performed for all criteria pollutants when emissions of any criteria pollutant resulting from project construction or operational activities exceed the 100 pounds per day screening level, after compliance with Rule 9510 requirements and implementation of all enforceable mitigation measures.

As shown above in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2, average daily emissions for construction and operational activities associated with this Project would not exceed 100 pounds per day. Therefore, an AAQA is not required for this Project.

5.7 Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) Impacts
TACs, as defined by the California Health & Safety Code (CH&SC) §44321, are listed in Appendices AI and AII in AB 2588 Air Toxic “Hot Spots” and Assessment Act’s Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guideline Regulation document. The proposed Project includes the removal of asbestos-containing pipeline and the operation of diesel-powered equipment which would potentially result in emissions of TACs. SJVAPCD’s risk management objectives for permitting and CEQA are as follows 9:

► Minimize health risks from new and modified sources of air pollution. ► Health risks from new and modified sources shall not be significant relative to the background risk levels and other risk levels that are typically accepted throughout the community. ► Avoid unreasonable restrictions on permitting.

To predict the potential health risk to the population attributable to emissions of diesel particulate matter from the proposed Project, ambient air concentrations were predicted with dispersion modeling to arrive at a conservative estimate of increased individual carcinogenic risk that might occur as a result of continuous exposure over a 0.5-year construction timeline each year from 2023 to 2027. Similarly, predicted concentrations were used to calculate non-cancer chronic and acute hazard indices (HIs), which are the ratio of expected exposure to acceptable exposure. The basis for evaluating potential health risk is the identification of sources with increased TACs.

Health risk is determined using the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP2) software distributed by the CARB; HARP2 requires peak 1-hour emission rates and annual-averaged emission rates for all pollutants for each modeling source

10. Assumptions used to calculate the emission rates for the proposed Project are outlined below.

The most recent version of EPA’s AMS/EPA Regulatory Model - AERMOD was used to predict the dispersion of emissions from the proposed Project. The analysis employed all of the regulatory default AERMOD model keyword parameters, including elevated terrain options.

For construction health impacts, diesel combustion emissions from diesel on-site construction equipment was modeled as an area source for on-site construction activity on the property. Diesel particulate matter

8 SJVAPCD GAMAQI, Section 8.4.4, Page 96-97.
9 SJVAPCD GAMAQI, Section 8.5.2, Page 100.
10 CARB, 2015, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf 238 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-4
was calculated using CalEEMod for on-site construction equipment. A unit emission rate of 1 grams/second (g/sec) was input to AERMOD for the area source.

Discrete receptors were placed on scattered agricultural houses and businesses within close proximity of the Project site. Receptor grids were placed over the more densely populated areas mostly to the east and south of the Project site. A total of 1,392 discrete off-site receptors analyzed. Elevated terrain options were employed even though there is not complex terrain in the Project area.

SJVAPCD-provided, AERMET UStar processed meteorological datasets for the Wasco monitoring station, calendar years 2007 through 2011 was input to AERMOD

11. This was the most recent available dataset
available at the time the modeling was conducted. Rural dispersion parameters were used because the operation and the majority of the land surrounding the facility is considered "rural" under the Auer land use classification method (Auer 1978).

Plot files generated by AERMOD were uploaded to the Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool (ADMRT) program in the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Version 2 (HARP 2)

10. ADMRT post-
processing was used to assess the potential for excess cancer risk and chronic and acute non-cancer effects using the most recent health effects data from the California EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). HARP2 site parameters were set for the mandatory minimum pathways of inhalation, soil ingestion, dermal, and mother’s milk. Risk reports were generated using the derived OEHHA analysis method for carcinogenic risk and non-carcinogenic chronic and acute risk. Site parameters are included in the HARP2 output files. Total cancer risk was predicted for each receptor. A hazard index was computed for chronic non-cancer health effects for each applicable endpoint and each receptor. A hazard index for acute non-cancer health effects was not computed since DPM does not have a risk exposure level for acute risk.

SJVAPCD has set the level of significance for carcinogenic risk at twenty in one million, which is understood as the possibility of causing twenty additional cancer cases in a population of one million people. The level of significance for chronic and acute non-cancer risk is a hazard index of 1.0. All receptors were modeled as residential receptors.

The carcinogenic risk and the health hazard index (HI) for chronic non-cancer risk at the point of maximum impact (PMI) do not exceed the significance levels of twenty in one million (20 x 10 -6) and 1.0, respectively
for the proposed Project. The PMIs, are identified by receptor location and risk, and are provided in Table 5-3. The electronic AERMOD and HARP2 output files are provided in Appendix C.

Table 5-3. Potential Maximum Impacts Predicted by HARP
Value UTM East UTM North
Excess Cancer Risk 1.59E-05 286341.4 3942703.2
Chronic Hazard Index 3.31E-02 286341.4 3942703.2

As shown above in Table 5-3, the maximum predicted cancer risk for the proposed Project is 1.59E-05.

The maximum chronic non-cancer hazard index for the proposed Project is 3.31E-02. Since the PMI remained below the significance threshold for cancer and chronic risk, this Project would not have an adverse effect to any of the surrounding communities.

11 SJVAPCD, 2018, ftp://ftp2.valleyair.org/public/Modeling/Meteorological_Data/AERMET%20v18081_UStar/ 239 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-5
The potential health risk attributable to the proposed Project is determined to be less than significant based on the following conclusions:

1. Potential carcinogenic risk from the proposed Project is below the significance level of twenty in a million at each of the modeled receptors; and

2. The hazard index for the potential chronic non-cancer risk from the proposed Project is below the significance level of 1.0 at each of the modeled receptors.

3. The hazard index for the potential acute non-cancer risk was not calculated since there is no acute risk associated with DPM emission; therefore, the proposed Project is considered below the significance level.

Therefore, potential risk to the population attributable to emissions of TACs from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

5.8 Potential Impact on Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are defined as areas where young children, chronically ill individuals, the elderly or people who are more sensitive than the general population reside. Schools, hospitals, nursing homes and daycare centers are locations where sensitive receptors would likely reside. Since the Project sites are scattered throughout the City of Wasco, a 1-mile radius around each site would encompass the entire town.

Therefore, all sensitive receptors within the City of Wasco would be within a 1-mile radius of a project component.

As discussed in Section 5.7.2, the potential health risk attributable to the proposed Project is determined to be less than significant and are not expected to affect any on-site or off-site receptors, including the sensitive receptors located within Wasco, and is not expected to have any adverse impacts on any known receptor.

240 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 6-1

6. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the criteria established by the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI, SPAL guidelines, and CEQA Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form, the proposed Project does not meet the minimum standards to require a full Air Quality Impact Analysis. Furthermore, the Project as proposed would not exceed the SJVAPCD’s criteria air pollutant emission levels and would generate less than significant air quality impacts.

241 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 7-1

7. REFERENCES
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2021. California Emissions Estimator Model tm (CalEEMod), version 2020.4.0

----------. 2016. “Air Toxic Hot Spots” Facility Prioritization Guidelines, Revised 2016. Final August 2016 http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CAPCOA%20Prioritization%20Guidelines%20- %20August%202016%20FINAL.pdf

California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2015. Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP2) User Guide.
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic//toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf ,
accessed September 2022.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 2019. (Public Resources Code 21000 - 21189) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 – 15387).

---------. 2019. CEQA, Appendix G – Environmental Checklist Form, Final Text.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). 2020. Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL).

November 13, 2020. http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI-SPAL.PDF

-----------. 2015. Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI). March 19, 2015. https://www.valleyair.org/transportation/GAMAQI.pdf

-----------. 2009. Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects under CEQA. December 17, 2009.
http://www.valleyair.org/Programs/CCAP/12-17-
09/1%20CCAP%20-%20FINAL%20CEQA%20GHG%20Staff%20Report%20- %20Dec%2017%202009.pdf

----------. 2022. Air Monitoring Location Map. http://valleyair.org/aqinfo/air-monitoring.htm, accessed September 2022.

----------. 2018. UStar Meteorological Datasets for Wasco 2007-2011. https://www.valleyair.org/busind/pto/Tox_Resources/AirQualityMonitoring.htm#met_data

242 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants 7-1
APPENDIX A. PROPOSED PROJECT PLAN

243 of 676
. .. ...

SCALE r:.::-=-

CITY OF WASCO WATER

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT
Legend
0 Active
@ Proposed Project Well
Facility
0 Well to be Abandoned
Existing Well to be
Rehabilitated
,,.
- Proposed Water Pipeline
- Proposed Storm Pipeline
••••Existing Water Lines
••••Existing Storm Lines
[i
Ill
Proposed 1.0 MG Storage Tank
& Booster Pump Station
Future 1.0 MG Storage Tank &
Booster Pump Station
244 of 676

QK – Water System Improvement & Treatment Project / Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Trinity Consultants B-1
APPENDIX B. CALEEMOD EMISSIONS ESTIMATES OUTPUT FILES

245 of 676

1.0 MG Storage Tank - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Tank dimensions provided by Applicant.

Construction Phase - Estimated Construction Schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Estimated Construction Activities.

Vehicle Trips - Estimated one maintenance trip per month.

Fleet Mix - Estimated one maintenance trip per month.

Consumer Products - Project is a storage tank.

Area Coating - Project is a storage tank.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population User Defined Industrial 1.00 User Defined Unit 0.15 6,400.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Rural
3 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2023Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 1 of 21

1.0 MG Storage Tank - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 246 of 676
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 3200 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 9600 0
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 26.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/18/2023 4/25/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/4/2023 4/24/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/12/2023 4/25/2023 tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF_Degreaser 3.542E-07 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF_PesticidesFertilizers 5.152E-08 0 tblFleetMix HHD 0.04 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.48 0.33
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.05 0.33
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.34
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix LHD2 9.8160e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix MDV 0.17 0.00
tblFleetMix MH 4.7320e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.9100e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 1.5170e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.4100e-004 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 6,400.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 0.15
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 2 of 21

1.0 MG Storage Tank - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I I
. . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y••----------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------ . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•--------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------------------------------------- . . -----------------------------T------------------------------.------------------------------ 247 of 676

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Excavators
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Cement and Mortar Mixers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Rollers
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Generator Sets tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.23
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 3 of 21

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0612 0.1564 0.2016 3.4000e-
004

5.7000e-
004

7.6100e-
003

8.1800e-
003

1.5000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

7.3000e-
003

0.0000 29.3015 29.3015 7.0700e-
003

4.0000e-
005

29.4914
Maximum 0.0612 0.1564 0.2016 3.4000e-
004

5.7000e-
004

7.6100e-
003

8.1800e-
003

1.5000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

7.3000e-
003

0.0000 29.3015 29.3015 7.0700e-
003

4.0000e-
005

29.4914
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0612 0.1564 0.2016 3.4000e-
004

5.7000e-
004

7.6100e-
003

8.1800e-
003

1.5000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

7.3000e-
003

0.0000 29.3015 29.3015 7.0700e-
003

4.0000e-
005

29.4913
Maximum 0.0612 0.1564 0.2016 3.4000e-
004

5.7000e-
004

7.6100e-
003

8.1800e-
003

1.5000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

7.3000e-
003

0.0000 29.3015 29.3015 7.0700e-
003

4.0000e-
005

29.4913
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 4 of 21

I I I I I I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I '

I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I '

I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
249 of 676
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.2122 0.2122
Highest 0.2122 0.2122

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e- 005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 5 of 21

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e- 005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Building Construction Building Construction 3/18/2023 4/24/2023 5 26 2 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/25/2023 4/25/2023 5 1 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 6 of 21

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
■ ■ I
-------~------------------------~----------------------+-------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- 251 of 676

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 3.00 1.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 9,600; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,200; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 7 of 21

I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I
----------------~---------------1-----------~---------+---------~-----------I-----------~---------~------------~---------!----------- ■
■
. . . .
252 of 676

3.2 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0164 0.1551 0.1992 3.3000e-
004

7.5700e-
003

7.1100e-
003

0.0000 28.5476 28.5476 7.0500e-
003

0.0000 28.7238
Total 0.0164 0.1551 0.1992 3.3000e-
004

7.5700e-
003

7.1100e-
003

0.0000 28.5476 28.5476 7.0500e-
003

0.0000 28.7238
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2312 0.2312 0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.2414
Worker 1.5000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.3300e-
003

0.0000 4.9000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.3901 0.3901 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3933
Total 1.6000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

1.5100e-
003

0.0000 5.7000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.6213 0.6213 1.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.6347
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 8 of 21

I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I
253 of 676

7.5700e-
003

7.1100e-
003

0.0000 28.5476 28.5476 7.0500e-
003

0.0000 28.7238
Total 0.0164 0.1551 0.1992 3.3000e-
004

7.5700e-
003

7.1100e-
003

0.0000 28.5476 28.5476 7.0500e-
003

0.0000 28.7238
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2312 0.2312 0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.2414
Worker 1.5000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.3300e-
003

0.0000 4.9000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.3901 0.3901 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3933
Total 1.6000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

1.5100e-
003

0.0000 5.7000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.6213 0.6213 1.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.6347
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 9 of 21

I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

3.3 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0445 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0000e-
004

6.5000e-
004

9.1000e-
004

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1277 0.1277 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1279
Total 0.0446 6.5000e-
004

9.1000e-
004

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1277 0.1277 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1279
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-
003

5.0000e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 5.0400e-
003
Total 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-
003

5.0000e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 5.0400e-
003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 10 of 21

6.5000e-
004

9.1000e-
004

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1277 0.1277 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1279
Total 0.0446 6.5000e-
004

9.1000e-
004

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1277 0.1277 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1279
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-
003

5.0000e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 5.0400e-
003
Total 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-
003

5.0000e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 5.0400e-
003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 11 of 21

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by User Defined Industrial 14.70 6.60 6.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
----------- •r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------.--------,--------.--------,--------,--------• --- --- -r--------.--------,--------,------- .... ------- ■ I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
257 of 676

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 13 of 21

I I I I I I I I I
' I I

I I I I I
■ e I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• .. ' •• I I ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• .. ' •• I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
----------- .,..-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· ------ -~-------,--------,--------,--------,, --- ----.. .. 258 of 676

1.0 MG Storage Tank - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, '
' ' '
I
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ., '
259 of 676
Use Electric Lawnmower

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

1.0 MG Storage Tank - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, '
'
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ., '
260 of 676
Use Electric Leafblower
Use Electric Chainsaw
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Total 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 16 of 21

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -..-------"'T"------"'T"-------,--------,-------"'T"------"'T"------"'T"-------.--------,--------• - - - - - - -r-------"'T"------"'T"-------,--------r - - - - - - -., ., ., ., I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
-------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•········-------,-------,-------,-------~-------& I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
-------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•········-------,-------,-------,-------~-------., ., &
I I
I
261 of 676

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Total 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 17 of 21

I I I
I
'
I
I I I
I I I
263 of 676

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

1.0 MG Storage Tank - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied '
1,
' ' '
1,
' ' '
1,
' ' ' I,
' '
I I I
.,
■ I I I I
. --. -----. -.... ------..-----------------,. -----. - ., .,
' ' ' '
264 of 676

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 1:14 PMPage 20 of 21

11.0 Vegetation

1.0 MG Storage Tank - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 266 of 676
Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project
Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage provided by Applicant
Construction Phase - Proposed Construction Schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Estimated Construction Activities.

Off-road Equipment - Proposed Construction Schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Estimated Construction Activities.

Grading - Yellow cells upon entry.

Vehicle Trips - Estimated one trip for maintenance a month.

Consumer Products -
Area Coating - Project is a municipal well.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population User Defined Industrial 1.00 User Defined Unit 1.00 721.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Rural
3 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2027Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 1 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 267 of 676
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Fleet Mix - Estimated one trip for maintenance a month.

Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 361 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 1082 0
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 4.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 88.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 4.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.04 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.49 0.33
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.05 0.33
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.34
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix LHD2 8.5740e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix MDV 0.15 0.00
tblFleetMix MH 3.8820e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.7300e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 1.3790e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.3100e-004 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.25 1.50
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 721.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 2.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 2 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I I I
I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------~-------------------------- 268 of 676

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 2.00
tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.23
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 3 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ,-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1--.. - - - - - - - - - -.. - - - - - - - - - -.. · t · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --, -----------------------------y•------------------------------------------------------------~-------------------------- ■ ■ '
■ ■ '
269 of 676

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2026 6.5000e-
003

0.0631 0.0759 1.9000e-
004

8.8000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

3.3100e-
003

1.1000e-
004

2.2400e-
003

2.3500e-
003

0.0000 16.7458 16.7458 5.4000e-
003

0.0000 16.8812
2027 0.0280 0.2203 0.2690 6.6000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

8.5900e-
003

9.0400e-
003

1.2000e-
004

7.9200e-
003

8.0400e-
003

0.0000 58.2502 58.2502 0.0186 1.0000e-
005

58.7159
Maximum 0.0280 0.2203 0.2690 6.6000e-
004

8.8000e-
004

8.5900e-
003

9.0400e-
003

1.2000e-
004

7.9200e-
003

8.0400e-
003

0.0000 58.2502 58.2502 0.0186 1.0000e-
005

58.7159
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2026 6.5000e-
003

0.0631 0.0759 1.9000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

2.8300e-
003

6.0000e-
005

2.2400e-
003

2.3000e-
003

0.0000 16.7458 16.7458 5.4000e-
003

0.0000 16.8811
2027 0.0280 0.2203 0.2690 6.6000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

8.5900e-
003

9.0400e-
003

1.2000e-
004

7.9200e-
003

8.0400e-
003

0.0000 58.2501 58.2501 0.0186 1.0000e-
005

58.7158
Maximum 0.0280 0.2203 0.2690 6.6000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

8.5900e-
003

9.0400e-
003

1.2000e-
004

7.9200e-
003

8.0400e-
003

0.0000 58.2501 58.2501 0.0186 1.0000e-
005

58.7158
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 4 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I I
I
•• I •• I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,- - - - - - - - ., .,
I I I
I
270 of 676
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.84 0.00 3.89 21.74 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 12-1-2026 2-28-2027 0.2112 0.2112
2 3-1-2027 5-31-2027 0.1093 0.1093
Highest 0.2112 0.2112

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e- 005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 5 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 271 of 676

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e- 005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 12/1/2026 12/1/2026 5 1 2 Grading Grading 12/2/2026 12/3/2026 5 2
3 Building Construction Building Construction 12/4/2026 4/6/2027 5 88 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 6 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
■ ■ I
-------~------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- ■ ■ I I I I I
■ ■ I I I I I
-------~------------------------~----------------------+-------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- 272 of 676
4 Paving Paving 4/23/2027 4/28/2027 5 4
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/30/2027 5/5/2027 5 4 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 2.00 187 0.41
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 221 0.50
Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 1 3.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,082; Non-Residential Outdoor: 361; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 7 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied : :
-------•------------------------•----------------------+------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- I I
I
I
I I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------t---------+--------------1 I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------t---------T--------------1 I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------t---------+--------------1 I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------t---------T--------------1 I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------t---------T--------------1 I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~----------------~ -----------~-------------~-------------- • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
----------------:---------------~----------:----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I
----------------~---------------1-----------~---------~---------~-----------1-----------~---------~------------~---------1----------- 273 of 676

6.7000e-
004

1.1100e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1370 0.1370 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1381
Total 7.0000e-
005

6.7000e-
004

1.1100e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1370 0.1370 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1381
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 8 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --• - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ - - - - - - - - - -• - - - - - - - - --• - - - - - - - - -• - - - - - - - - - -+ - - - - - - - - - -• - - - - - - - - -.. - - - - - - - - - - - - -.. - - - - - - - - --• - - - - - - - - - - & ., &
., &
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------··-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T"-------1' -------,-------,-------,-------,-------,---- ----., ., &
&
&
&
274 of 676

3.2 Site Preparation - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0136 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0137
Total 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0136 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0137
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.0000e-
005

6.7000e-
004

1.1100e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1370 0.1370 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1381
Total 7.0000e-
005

6.7000e-
004

1.1100e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1370 0.1370 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1381
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 9 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I
275 of 676

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0136 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0137
Total 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0136 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0137
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 8.0000e-
004

0.0000 8.0000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 9.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
003

9.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2137 0.2137 7.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2154
Total 1.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
003

9.6000e-
004

0.0000 8.0000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

8.4000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.2137 0.2137 7.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2154
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 10 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I
276 of 676

3.3 Grading - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.4000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0452 0.0452 0.0000 0.0000 0.0455
Total 2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.4000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0452 0.0452 0.0000 0.0000 0.0455
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 3.1000e-
004

0.0000 3.1000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
003

9.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2137 0.2137 7.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2154
Total 1.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
003

9.6000e-
004

0.0000 3.1000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2137 0.2137 7.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2154
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 11 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I
277 of 676

1.0000e-
005

1.4000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0452 0.0452 0.0000 0.0000 0.0455
Total 2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.4000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0452 0.0452 0.0000 0.0000 0.0455
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0612 0.0736 1.9000e-
004

2.3700e-
003

2.1800e-
003

0.0000 16.3364 16.3364 5.2800e-
003

0.0000 16.4684
Total 6.3000e-
003

0.0612 0.0736 1.9000e-
004

2.3700e-
003

2.1800e-
003

0.0000 16.3364 16.3364 5.2800e-
003

0.0000 16.4684
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 12 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' '
'
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I
278 of 676

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.3000e-
003

0.0612 0.0736 1.9000e-
004

2.3700e-
003

2.1800e-
003

0.0000 16.3363 16.3363 5.2800e-
003

0.0000 16.4684
Total 6.3000e-
003

0.0612 0.0736 1.9000e-
004

2.3700e-
003

2.1800e-
003

0.0000 16.3363 16.3363 5.2800e-
003

0.0000 16.4684
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 13 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' '
'
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I
279 of 676

8.0500e-
003

7.4100e-
003

0.0000 55.5436 55.5436 0.0180 0.0000 55.9927
Total 0.0214 0.2081 0.2504 6.3000e-
004

8.0500e-
003

7.4100e-
003

0.0000 55.5436 55.5436 0.0180 0.0000 55.9927
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 14 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' '
'
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I
280 of 676

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0214 0.2081 0.2504 6.3000e-
004

8.0500e-
003

7.4100e-
003

0.0000 55.5435 55.5435 0.0180 0.0000 55.9926
Total 0.0214 0.2081 0.2504 6.3000e-
004

8.0500e-
003

7.4100e-
003

0.0000 55.5435 55.5435 0.0180 0.0000 55.9926
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 15 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' '
'
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I
281 of 676

3.5 Paving - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 1.1300e-
003

9.8400e-
003

0.0141 2.0000e-
005

4.4000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 1.8802 1.8802 5.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.8939
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1300e-
003

9.8400e-
003

0.0141 2.0000e-
005

4.4000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 1.8802 1.8802 5.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.8939
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 16 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I
282 of 676

3.5 Paving - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

9.3000e-
004

0.0000 4.5000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.3157 0.3157 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3179
Total 1.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

9.3000e-
004

0.0000 4.5000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.3157 0.3157 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3179
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 1.1300e-
003

9.8400e-
003

0.0141 2.0000e-
005

4.4000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 1.8802 1.8802 5.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.8939
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1300e-
003

9.8400e-
003

0.0141 2.0000e-
005

4.4000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 1.8802 1.8802 5.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.8939
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 17 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I
283 of 676

7.0000e-
005

9.3000e-
004

0.0000 4.5000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.3157 0.3157 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3179
Total 1.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

9.3000e-
004

0.0000 4.5000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.3157 0.3157 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3179
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.4000e-
004

2.2900e-
003

3.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.5107 0.5107 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.5114
Total 5.3600e-
003

2.2900e-
003

3.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.5107 0.5107 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.5114
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 18 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I
284 of 676

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.4000e-
004

2.2900e-
003

3.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.5107 0.5107 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.5114
Total 5.3600e-
003

2.2900e-
003

3.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.5107 0.5107 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.5114
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 19 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I
285 of 676

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 20 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I I
286 of 676

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH User Defined Industrial 0.330000 0.330000 0.340000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 21 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
----------- .,..-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------• --- --- -r--------,--------,--------,--------r --- ---- ■ I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
287 of 676

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 22 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

I I I I I I I I I
I I I

I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.r--------.--------r------- ..... -------,------- ..... -------.--------,------- ..... -------,--------• - - - - - - -~------ ..... ------ ..... -------,-------....,. - - - - - - - 288 of 676

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 23 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, '
' ' '
I
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ., '
289 of 676
Use Electric Lawnmower

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 24 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, '
'
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ., '
290 of 676
Use Electric Leafblower
Use Electric Chainsaw
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 2.8200e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Unmitigated 2.8200e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

2.8200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Total 2.8200e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 25 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

2.8200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Total 2.8200e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 26 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I
292 of 676
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 27 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ., .,
I I I
■ I I I I
. -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------r --. ----., .,
' I
I
I
I,
I, ,. ,.

I I I
I
'
I
I I I
I I I
293 of 676

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 28 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied '
1,
' ' '
1,
' ' '
1,
' ' ' I,
' '
I I I
.,
■ I I I I
. --. -----. -.... ------..-----------------,. -----. - ., .,
' ' ' '
294 of 676

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 29 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ,, ' ' ' ' ,, ' ' ' ' ., '
' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ,, '
295 of 676

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/5/2022 1:40 PMPage 30 of 30 Well 2 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 296 of 676
Well 2 - Trenching
Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Estimate of construction area: 50 ft of pipe by 6ft wide trench.

Construction Phase - Estimated Construction Activities.

Off-road Equipment - Estimated Construction Activities.

Area Coating - Construction Run Only
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Consumer Products - Construction Run Only
Landscape Equipment - Construction Run Only

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population User Defined Industrial 1.00 User Defined Unit 0.01 300.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Rural
3 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2026Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 150 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 450 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 1 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied , ............................. i ............................. i---------------------➔··························' 297 of 676

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/30/2026 12/1/2026
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF_Degreaser 3.542E-07 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF_PesticidesFertilizers 5.152E-08 0 tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 180 0
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 300.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 0.01
tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 2 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied : :
-----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•------------------------------------------------------------ 298 of 676

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2026 3.0000e-
004

2.9100e-
003

2.7300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.5414 0.5414 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.5457
Maximum 3.0000e-
004

2.9100e-
003

2.7300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.5414 0.5414 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.5457
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2026 3.0000e-
004

2.9100e-
003

2.7300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.5414 0.5414 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.5457
Maximum 3.0000e-
004

2.9100e-
003

2.7300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.5414 0.5414 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.5457
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 3 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ., ' ' '

I I I I I I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I '

I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I '

I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I
299 of 676
Highest

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 4 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ., ., &
&
&
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••a-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., & ., &
&
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••a-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., & ., &
&
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••a-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., & ., &
&
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••a-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., & ., &
&
&
300 of 676

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Trenching Trenching 12/1/2026 12/1/2026 5 1
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 5 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I !
I
I
I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
! ! !
301 of 676

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Trenching Cranes 1 10.00 231 0.29
Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 5.50 97 0.37
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Trenching 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 6 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1----------------------------~----------------------t-------------t----------t----------i--------------l 302 of 676

3.2 Trenching - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
003

2.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.5052 0.5052 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.5093
Total 2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
003

2.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.5052 0.5052 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.5093
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000 5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0361 0.0361 0.0000 0.0000 0.0364
Total 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000 5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0361 0.0361 0.0000 0.0000 0.0364
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 7 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ., ' ' '

I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

2.9000e-
003

2.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.5052 0.5052 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.5093
Total 2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
003

2.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.5052 0.5052 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.5093
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000 5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0361 0.0361 0.0000 0.0000 0.0364
Total 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000 5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0361 0.0361 0.0000 0.0000 0.0364
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 8 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ., ' ' '

I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
., I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
' '

I I I I

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH User Defined Industrial 0.488129 0.054374 0.179646 0.157061 0.028618 0.008866 0.014149 0.038412 0.000576 0.000233 0.024457 0.001405 0.004073 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 9 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 10 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

I I I I I I I I I
I I I

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 11 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, '
' ' '
I
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ,, ' ' ' '
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I
' ., '
307 of 676

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 12 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, '
'
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ,, ' '
I
' ., '
308 of 676
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
. -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' '
' ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 309 of 676

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 14 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I
310 of 676
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 15 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ., .,
I I I
■ I I I I
. -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------r --. ----., .,
' I
I
I
I,
I, ,. ,.

I I I
I
'
I
I I I
I I I
311 of 676

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 16 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied '
1,
' ' '
1,
' ' '
1,
' ' ' I,
' '
I I I
.,
■ I I I I
. --. -----. -.... ------..-----------------,. -----. - ., .,
' ' ' '
312 of 676

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 17 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ,, ' ' ' ' ,, ' ' ' ' ., '
' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ,, '
313 of 676

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:35 PMPage 18 of 18 Well 2 - Trenching - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 314 of 676
Well 12 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project
Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage provided by Applicant
Construction Phase - Proposed Construction Schedule.

Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - Estimated Construction Activities.

Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Estimated one trip for maintenance a month.

Area Coating - Project is a municipal well.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Fleet Mix - Estimated one trip for maintenance a month.

Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population User Defined Industrial 1.00 User Defined Unit 1.00 2,075.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Rural
3 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2027Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:19 PMPage 1 of 24 Well 12 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 315 of 676
Off-road Equipment - Estimated Construction Activities.

Trips and VMT -
Consumer Products - Project is a municipal well.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1038 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 3113 0
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 79.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/22/2027 3/22/2027
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/4/2026 12/2/2026 tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF_Degreaser 3.542E-07 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF_PesticidesFertilizers 5.152E-08 0 tblFleetMix HHD 0.04 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.49 0.33
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.05 0.33
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.34
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix LHD2 8.5740e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix MDV 0.15 0.00
tblFleetMix MH 3.8820e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.7300e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 1.3790e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.3100e-004 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 2,075.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 1.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/2/2022 12:19 PMPage 2 of 24 Well 12 - Water System Improvement & Treatment Project - Kern-San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied I I I
I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------~-------------------------- 316 of 676

Wasco City CouncilOctober 7, 2025

Wasco City Council
October 7, 2025