Waterford City Council
May 19, 2022

AGENDA

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING

WATERFORD CITY HALL, CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS 101 “E” STREET, WATERFORD, CA

CALL TO ORDER &
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Aldaco
INVOCATION: Invocation
ROLL CALL:

Mayor: Jose Aldaco
Vice Mayor: Joseph Ewing, III
Council Members: Jamie Hilton, Jill Kitchens, Elizabeth Talbott ADOPTION OF AGENDA:

A member of the City Council motions to accept the items on the agenda for consideration as presented, or motions for any additions, including emergency items, or items pulled from consideration.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION:

Declaration by City Council members who may have a direct Conflict of Interest on any scheduled agenda item to be considered.

1. 1a: PRESENTATION: Proclamation declaring May 15th – 21st, 2022, as National Public Works Week in the City of Waterford.

2. This is the portion of the meeting specifically set aside to invite public comments regarding any matters not appearing on the agenda and within the jurisdiction of the City Council or the Successor Agency. Individual audience participation is limited to a maximum of 5 minutes. We encourage you to share your name and address, or submit a speaker card to the City Clerk.

3. All Matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine by the Council and will be adopted by one action of the Council unless any Council Member desires to discuss any item or items separately. In that event, the Mayor will remove that item from the Consent Calendar and action will be considered separately.
3a: MOTION: Waiving all Readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by title. 3b: RESOLUTION: Adopting Resolution 2022-25, Approving the Warrant Register in the Amount of $274,553.73 for the Period of April 29 to May 2, 2022.

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING – May 19, 2022 - 6:30 PM

COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE

PRESENTATIONS

ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR
3c: MOTION: Approving Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held May 5, 2022. 3d: MOTION: Accepting the Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022.

4. 4.

5. 6.
6a: RESOLUTION: Approving Resolution 2022-26, Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a General Municipal Election to be Held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the Election of Certain Officers as Required by the Provisions of the Laws of the State of California Relating to General Law Cities.

RESOLUTION: Approving Resolution 2022-27, Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus to Consolidate a General Municipal Election to be Held on November 8, 2022, with the Statewide General Election to be Held on the Date Pursuant to Section 10403 of the Elections Code.

RESOLUTION: Approving Resolution 2022-28, Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Elective Office Pertaining to Candidate Statements Submitted to the Voters at an Election to be Held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022. (Krause)
6b: RESOLUTION: Adopting Resolution 2022-29, Confirming the Annual Engineers Report and Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect an Assessment of $11.24 per Parcel for the Waterford Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and Setting a Public Hearing date for June 16, 2022. (Krause)
6c: RESOLUTION: Adopting Resolution 2022-30, Confirming the Annual Engineers Report and Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect an Assessment of $52.00 per Parcel (Zone A) and $28.52 (Zone B) for the Waterford Landscape and Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and Setting a Public Hearing date for June 16, 2022. (Krause)
6d: MOTION: Awarding an Agreement with GHD, Inc of Roseville, Ca. in the amount of $221,264 for the preparation of a Yosemite Blvd Corridor Study. (Pitcock) 6e: RESOLUTION: Adopting Resolution 2022-31, Authorizing the City Manager to Submit a Ballot Measure to the City’s Qualified Voters at the November 08, 2022, Statewide General Election, Authorizing a Four-Year term for the Office of the Mayor for the City of Waterford. (Dupont)

7. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER WATERFORD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

GENERAL BUSINESS

FINAL READINGS

PUBLIC HEARINGS

8. 8a: City Project List

9. 9a: City Staff
9b: City Council

10. 11.
11a: "CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR"
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Designated Labor Negotiator: Corbett Browning, City Attorney - International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers, Local 39

12. NOTICE
REPORTS: Copies of the staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection at the front counter at City Hall during normal business hours.

COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE: If you wish to address the City Council or the Successor Agency on any item not on the printed agenda, prior to the start of the meeting, or prior to addressing the City Council or the Successor Agency, complete and submit a speaker card and deliver it to the City Clerk. (Please note, speaker cards are not required, however completing a speaker card enables staff to better follow up with you later, if necessary and attribute your comments to you in the minutes of the meeting). When the Mayor calls for “Communications from the Audience,” stand or raise your hand and the Mayor will ask you to approach the podium and state your name and city of residence. It is the policy of the City Council that they will not act on any matter not appearing on the posted agenda. The purpose of the discussion is to permit a member of the public to raise an issue or problem and to permit the City Council to ask questions for clarification of the issue or problem, provide information to the public, provide direction of the City Staff, or schedule the matter for a future meeting. Please hold all comments to five (5) minutes.

PUBLIC COMMENTS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THE PRINTED AGENDA: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council or the Successor Agency concerning any item that is described on the agenda during consideration of that item. If during a public hearing, the Mayor will direct when the hearing has opened for public comment. If you wish to address the City Council or the Successor Agency on any item listed on this agenda, please complete a speaker card and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to discussion of that item. (Please note, speaker cards are not required, however completing a speaker card enables staff to better follow up with you later, if necessary and attribute your comments to you in the minutes of the meeting.) When your name is called proceed to the podium and state your name and city of residence.

WRITTEN MATERIAL INTRODUCED INTO THE RECORD: Citizens wishing to introduce written material into the record at the public hearing on any item are requested to provide a copy of the written material to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing date and/or prior to the opening of the public hearing so that the material may be distributed to the City Council prior to the public hearing.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

LIVE AND ON-DEMAND VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY: The meeting of the Waterford City Council/Successor Agency can be watched live and on-demand from the City’s website at www.cityofwaterford.org.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA): In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and you need a disabilityrelated modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (209) 874-2328 ext. 101 or email:
[email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two-full business days before the start of the meeting

CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURNMENT / RECESS

STAFF/COUNCIL COMMENTS AND MEETING REPORTS

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
General Information: The Waterford City Council meets on the 1st and 3rd Thursdays of each month at 6:30PM., unless otherwise noticed.

Council Agenda’s: Copies of City Council Agenda and agenda related writings or documents will be made available for public inspection at the front counter at City Hall located at 101 “E” Street, Waterford, CA 72 hours prior to the meeting, or at the time of the scheduled meeting. _______________________________________________________ Patricia Krause, CMC, City Clerk Date
Presentations 1a
May 19, 2022
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager City Council Staff Report
Proclamation: National Public Works Week May 15
th – 21st, 2022
SUMMARY:

Mayor Jose Aldaco to present Proclamation declaring May 15th – 21st, 2022, as National Public Works Week in the City of Waterford.

ANALYSIS:

On behalf of the City Council of the City of Waterford, Mayor Aldaco will present a Proclamation to Public Works Superintendent Lonnie Statzer, in appreciation of the dedication and skills of the City’s Public Works staff.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Not Applicable.

ALTERNATIVES:

Not Applicable.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Proclamation – National Public Works Week
Proclamation
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department provides services for our community and are a vital and integral part of our citizens’ everyday lives; and
WHEREAS, the support of the community is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets, fleet maintenance, building maintenance, wastewater treatment and solid waste operations; and WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and
WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works officials; and
WHEREAS, the efficiency and effectiveness of the qualified skilled staff contribute to the quality of life that residents and visitors alike enjoy and rely upon from the City of Waterford;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Waterford that we recognize and extend appreciation to our dedicated and skilled staff and hereby proclaim the week of May 15-21, 2022 as
“National Public Works Week”
AND, BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the City Council requests that all citizens and civic organizations acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing public works services to our community and to recognize the contributions which our public works employees make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life.

Signed this 19
th day of May, 2022.
____________________________________
Jose Aldaco, Mayor of Waterford
Consent Calendar 3a
May 19, 2022
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager City Council Staff Report
Motion: Waive Readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, Except by Title.

SUMMARY:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the waiver of readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by title.

ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to California Government Code §36934, approval of the waiver of readings will allow Ordinances and Resolutions to be introduced by title only and acted upon without the need to read the entire text of the item into the public record. The documents related to proposed Ordinances and Resolutions are available for review by the public on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Direct the City Clerk to read the entire text of resolutions and ordinances prior to approval and adoption.

2. Take no action.

ATTACHMENTS:

N/A
Consent Calendar 3b
May 19, 2022
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager City Council Staff Report
Resolution: Adopting Resolution 2022-25, Approving the Warrant Register in the Amount of $274,553.73 for the Period of April 29 to May 2, 2022.

SUMMARY:

Consider approving the Warrant Register for the period of April 29 to May 2, 2022.

ANALYSIS:

As per Government Code Section §41004, a listing of all payments the City has made for goods and services need to be approved by City Council on a regular basis. This Warrant Register includes payments and payroll made for the period of April 29 to May 2, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Payments for this period total $274,553.73.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Take no action.

2. Provide staff with further direction.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Resolution #2022-25
• Check Register Report

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL

DATE TOTAL
PAYROLL 5/2/2022 $ 30,926.92
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 4/29/2022 $ 226,605.08
5/2/2022 $ 17,021.73
TOTAL $ 274,553.73
Passed and Adopted by the City Council of Waterford at a regular meeting held on By the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

PATRICIA KRAUSE, CMC, CITY CLERK JOSE M. ALDACO, MAYOR
RESOLUTION 2022-25
RESOLUTION # 2022-25
xxxx
The City of Waterford does hereby reserve, determine and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That in accordance with Section 37202 of the Government Code that the City Manager hereby certifies to the accuracy of the following demands and the availability of funds for the payment thereof.

SECTION 2: That the following claims and demands are subject to audit as required by law, and that the same are hereby set forth.

User:

Printed: 05/02/2022 - 9:21AM
'trish'
Payroll
Include Partial: FALSE
ACH Check Register
Batch: 00002.05.2022
Check Date Check Number Employee No Employee Name Amount 05/02/2022 0 1002 2,522.86
05/02/2022 0 1006 1,049.65
05/02/2022 0 1008 2,009.36
05/02/2022 0 1011 14.67
05/02/2022 0 1015 1,286.87
05/02/2022 0 1017 1,167.85
05/02/2022 0 2004 2,309.25
05/02/2022 0 2005 2,040.79
05/02/2022 0 2006 2,718.43
05/02/2022 0 2007 113.23
05/02/2022 0 2010 760.85
05/02/2022 0 2012 2,086.82
05/02/2022 0 2020 3,982.48
05/02/2022 0 2023 1,636.10
05/02/2022 0 2024 1,864.74
05/02/2022 0 2028 1,540.96
05/02/2022 0 2030 1,740.07
05/02/2022 0 2031 1,442.38
05/02/2022 0 3004 134.93
05/02/2022 0 3010 125.58
05/02/2022 0 3011 126.35
05/02/2022 0 3012 126.35
05/02/2022 0 3013 126.35
Total Employees: Total: 23 30,926.92
PR- ACH Check Register (05/02/2022 - 9:21 AM) Page 1

User:

Printed: 05/02/2022 - 10:22AM
trish
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch: 00002.05.2022
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 105201 BANK OF THE WEST (IRS TAXES) Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.05.2022 FICA Employee Portion 117.61 05/02/2022 1010-000-2240 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 FICA Employee Portion PR Batch 00002.05.2022 FICA Employer Portion 117.61 05/02/2022 1010-000-2240 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 FICA Employer Portion PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Medicare Employee Portion 642.08 05/02/2022 1010-000-2240 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Medicare Employee Portion PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Medicare Employer Portion 642.08 05/02/2022 1010-000-2240 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Medicare Employer Portion PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Federal Income Tax 4,152.59 05/02/2022 1010-000-2220 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Federal Income Tax Check Total: 5,671.97
Vendor: 108350 CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.05.2022 EDD TRAINING TAX 1.42 05/02/2022 1010-000-2260 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 EDD TRAINING TAX PR Batch 00002.05.2022 CALIFORNIA SDI 487.05 05/02/2022 1010-000-2260 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 CALIFORNIA SDI PR Batch 00002.05.2022 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT 28.28 05/02/2022 1010-000-2260 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT PR Batch 00002.05.2022 State Income Tax 1,411.43 05/02/2022 1010-000-2230 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 State Income Tax Check Total: 1,928.18
Vendor: 139400 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.05.2022 EMPLOYEE PERS CONTRIBUTION 2,899.91 05/02/2022 1010-000-2270 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 EMPLOYEE PERS CONTR PR Batch 00002.05.2022 EMPLOYER PAID PERS 3,834.96 05/02/2022 1010-000-2270 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 EMPLOYER PAID PERS Check Total: 6,734.87
Vendor: 148050 STATIONARY ENGINEERS LOCAL 39 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False PR Batch 00002.05.2022 UNION DUES 291.25 05/02/2022 1010-000-2290 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 UNION DUES Check Total: 291.25
Vendor: 154101 VANTGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False PR Batch 00002.05.2022 DEFERRED COMP-457 745.00 05/02/2022 1010-000-2280 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 DEFERRED COMP-457 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 DEFERRED COMP 457 - % 781.09 05/02/2022 1010-000-2280 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 DEFERRED COMP 457 - % PR Batch 00002.05.2022 DEFERRED COM-457 - EMPLOYER PD 213.02 05/02/2022 1010-000-2285 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 DEFERRED COM-457 - EM PR Batch 00002.05.2022 457 LOAN REPAY 656.35 05/02/2022 1010-000-2280 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 457 LOAN REPAY AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/02/2022 - 10:22 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 2,395.46
Total for Check Run:

Total of Number of Checks:
17,021.73
5 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/02/2022 - 10:22 AM) Page 2 Consent Calendar 3c
May 19, 2022
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager City Council Staff Report
Motion: Approving Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held May 5, 2022.

SUMMARY:

Consider approving minutes from the May 5, 2022 Regular City Council meeting.

ANALYSIS:

Approve Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on May 5, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Direct the City Clerk to make amendments to the minutes and bring them back for approval at a future City Council meeting.

2. Take no action.

ATTACHMENTS:
• City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of May 5, 2022.

MINUTES

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR

MEETING WATERFORD CITY HALL, CITY
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 101 “E” STREET,

WATERFORD, CA
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER BY MAYOR ALDACO AT: 6:30 pm
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Aldaco
ROLL CALL PRESENT:

Mayor Aldaco
Vice Mayor Ewing
Council Member Hilton
Council Member Talbott
ABSENT: Council Member Kitchens
STAFF PRESENT:

Michael Pitcock, City Manager
Corbett Browning, City Attorney
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager Lonnie Statzer, Public Works Superintendent
Michael Parker, Police Chief
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:

ACTION: By motion moved and seconded (CM Hilton / CM Talbott / 4-0) to adopt the Agenda.

AYES: Aldaco, Ewing, Hilton, Talbott
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Kitchens
ABSTAIN: None
Motion passed 4-0.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION:

None.

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING – May 5, 2022 - 6:30 PM

1. 1a: PRESENTATION: Proclamation declaring May 2022 as Older Americans Month.

Mayor Aldaco presented the proclamation for Older Americans Month. 1b: PRESENTATION: Proclamation declaring the week of May 1st – 7th, 2022 as Municipal Clerks week.

Mayor Aldaco presented the proclamation for Municipal Clerks Week.

2. None.

3. 3a: MOTION: Waiving all Readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by title. 3b: RESOLUTION: Adopting Resolution 2022-23, Approving the Warrant Register in the Amount of $136,863.00 for the Period of April 14 to April 18, 2022. 3c: MOTION: Approving Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held April 21, 2022. 3d: RESOLUTION: Approving Resolution 2022-24, Authorizing the City Manager or his Designee to Submit the City’s SB 1 Project List to the California Transportation Commission.

ACTION: By motion moved and seconded (VM Ewing / CM Talbott / 4-0) to approve the consent calendar.

AYES: Aldaco, Ewing, Hilton, Talbott
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Kitchens
ABSTAIN: None
Motion passed 4-0.

4. 5.

6. 6a: WORKSHOP: Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Preliminary Budget (Envia) Finance Manager Envia gave a presentation to the Council on the preliminary budget for fiscal year 2022-2023 and answered questions.

COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE

PRESENTATION

GENERAL BUSINESS

FINAL READINGS

ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR

PUBLIC HEARINGS
6b: MOTION: Awarding Bid and Approving an Agreement with George Reed, Inc. in the Amount of $458,440.00 for Project No. 2022-05, “H & I Street Improvement Project” and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement. (Statzer)
ACTION: By motion moved and seconded (VM Ewing / CM Talbott / 4-0) to Award Bid and Approve an Agreement with George Reed, Inc. in the Amount of $458,440.00 for Project No. 2022-05, “H & I Street Improvement Project” and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement.

AYES: Aldaco, Ewing, Hilton, Talbott
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Kitchens
ABSTAIN: None
Motion passed 4-0.

7. 8.
8a: City Project List
8b: Business License Reports – February and March 2022

9. 9a: City Staff
Chief Parker updated the Council on the April crime statistic as well as the most recent calls of interest.

Chief Parker informed the Council that the Deputies are now using E-Cite printers that allow them to electronically write and print citations in the field.

Public Works Superintendent Statzer thanked Love Waterford for the great Love Waterford Event and informed Council that they will be having the Summer Wildlife Celebration in June and the Riverpark. Mr.

Statzer updated the Council on his annual meeting with Cal Recycle and stated that they City is doing well with staying in compliance.

City Clerk Krause thanked the Council for the recognition of Municipal Clerks Week.

City Attorney Browning informed the Council that Mr. Dupont would be attending the Annual City Attorney Conference this year and updated them on items for the next Council meeting as well as Closed Session for the evening.

City Manager Pitcock gave the Council an update on future capital projects and informed them that he is looking into a USDA loan for a water storage tank.
9b: City Council
Vice Mayor Ewing had no comments.

Councilmember Hilton had no comments.

Councilmember Talbott recognized the Museum Volunteers and Older Americans in the City of Waterford. Mrs. Talbott thanked Love Waterford for the great event and wished everyone a happy Asian American Pacific Islander Month.

STAFF/COUNCIL COMMENTS AND MEETING REPORTS

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER WATERFORD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Mayor Aldaco stated that the Love Waterford Event was great and thanked Mandy Wilson and the rest of the Love Waterford Group, as well as Public Works for being on standby to help with the event. Mr.

Aldaco commented that May is Mental Health Awareness Month and that he attended a great meeting at the State Theater regarding the Fentanyl crisis.

10. Meeting Recessed: 7:22 PM.

Mayor Aldaco recessed the City Council meeting at 7:22 PM to convene to Closed Session directly following the recess. Adjournment of the City Council meeting followed the Report out of Closed Session.

11. 11a: "CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR"
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Designated Labor Negotiator: Corbett Browning, City Attorney - International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers, Local 39

12. 12.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Waterford City Council at a regular meeting held on May 19, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

CITY OF WATERFORD:

________________________
Jose M. Aldaco, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patricia Krause, CMC, City Clerk

CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURNMENT / RECESS

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
Consent Item 3d
May 19, 2022
Tina Envia, Finance Manager
City Council Staff Report
Motion: Accepting the Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022.

SUMMARY:

Accept the Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter that ended March 31, 2022. The report is provided for informational purposes to keep the City Council informed as to the nature of the City’s investments and cash position.

ANALYSIS:

The City Treasurer is required to report quarterly to the City Council on the status of the cash and investments held by the City of Waterford. Attached is the report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.

Total cash and investments held by the City at March 31, 2022 totaled $9,102,185. The attached report details these amounts by account and Fund. The current investments held by the City of Waterford are in compliance with the Investment Policy and the City has sufficient cash flow to meet the City’s expected expenditures for the next six months.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The report is a disclosure of the cash and investments balance as of March 31, 2022.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Do not accept the Treasurer’s Report. This is not recommended, as Section 53646 of the California Government Code states the Treasurer or Chief Fiscal Officer shall render a report to the City Council and City Manager, at least quarterly, detailing information on all securities, investments and moneys of the City.

2. Provide direction to Staff.

3. Accept the Treasurers Report as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Treasurer’s Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 Prepared By: Tina Envia
Finance Manager PORTFOLIO Interest Earned Current Prior Quarter FINANCIAL INSTITUTION YIELD PERCENT for the Quarter Balance Balance Bank of the West - Checking 0.00% 68.68% $ - $ 6,251,236 $ 5,175,620Bank of the West - Payroll 0.00% 0.01% $ - $ 863 $ 862Chandler Asset ManagementCSJVRMA Investment Pool -3.21% 18.79% $ 4,917 $ 1,710,602 $ 1,705,685State of California - LAIF Funds (PFA) 0.37% 0.79% $ 42 $ 72,028 $ 71,986State of California - LAIF Funds (City) 0.37% 2.77% $ 145 $ 251,862 $ 251,717Investments - Bank of the West SEE DETAIL 8.96% $ 1,471 $ 815,594 $ 814,123TOTAL FOR THE CITY OF WATERFORD 100% $ 6,575 $ 9,102,185 $ 8,019,993The current investments held by the City of Waterford are in compliance with the InvestmentPolicy and the City has sufficient cash flow to meet the City's expected expenditures for thenext six months. The current balance represents the market value of the investments for all accounts except for the Investments - Bank of the West which are reflected at cost. Supplemental information is provided concerning the market value of that account.

TREASURER'S QUARTERLY REPORT
March 31, 2022
City of Waterford
Detail Listing of Investments Bank of the West
March 31, 2022
Investment Purchase Date Market Maturity Call Interest Estimated Investment CUSIP Type Par Value Price Purchased Value Date Date Rate YieldLos Angeles County PUB WKS 5.0% 54473EQF4 Municipal Bonds 60,000.00 64,903 3/23/2022 63,136 12/1/2023 5.00% 4.75%Nevada Irr Dist JT Powers 5.0% 641322BJO Municipal Bonds 65,000.00 69,878 3/23/2022 68,818 3/1/2024 5.00% 4.72%Apple Inc. Fixed Rate 2.7% 037833-BF-6 Corporate Bonds 100,000.00 92,690 9/1/2017 89,188 5/13/2022 2.70% 2.65%Microsoft Fixed Rate 2.375% 594918AT1 Corporate Bonds 100,000.00 102,281 9/1/2017 99,743 5/1/2023 2.38% 2.30%Microsoft Fixed Rate 3.625% 594918AW4 Corporate Bonds 200,000.00 209,310 3/23/2022 205,380 12/15/2023 3.63% 3.53%Alphabet Inc Fxd Rt 3.375% 02079KAB3 Corporate Bonds 165,000.00 171,277 3/23/2022 168,566 2/25/2024 3.38% 3.30%Chevron Corp Fixed Rate 2.895% 166764-BT-6 Corporate Bonds 100,000.00 103,525 9/1/2017 101,208 3/3/2024 2.90% 2.74% Total Investments - Book Value 813,864 796,039Money Market Account 1,730 1,730 815,594 797,769
City of Waterford
Cash Balance By Fund
Treasurers Report 3-31-2022
Fund Fund General/Investments Payroll Laif
Number Description Balance Balance WPFA Total
1010 General Fund 3,678,233 863 3,679,096
2005 Special Business Pilot Program 145,901 145,901
2010 Abandoned Vehicle Abatement 4,208 4,208
2030 CDBG Rehab Grant 0 0
2050 Gas Tax 233,995 233,995
2060 Housing Rehab Loans 0 0
2070 HCD Home Program 344,043 344,043
2080 CDBG Consortium 25,072 25,072
2091 Impact Fee Admin/Planning 38,851 38,851
2092 Impact Fee City Facilities 60,154 60,154
2093 Impact Fee Water 465,151 465,151
2100 Impact Fees Due to County 0 0
2110 Impact Fee Drainage 5,850 5,850
2121 Impact Fee Sewer Collection 39,369 39,369
2131 Impact Fee Parks and Rec 380,714 380,714
2151 Impact Fee Police 32,885 32,885
2170 Impact Fee Public Works 0 0
2171 Impact Fee Traffic 812,314 812,314
2191 Impact Fee Wastewater 370,581 370,581
2210 Lighting Landscaping District 24,818 24,818
2230 Lighting District 86,972 86,972
2240 CFD 2019-1 2,156 2,156
2270 Local Transportation Fund 26,632 26,632
2330 RDA Obligation Retirement Fund (1) (47,685) (47,685) 4350 Wastewater Improvements (2) (323,972) (323,972)
5050 Wastewater Treatment Plant 513,548 513,548
5070 Riverpoint Water System 77,773 77,773
5071 Waterford Water System 801,457 801,457
5072 Hickman Water System 84,818 84,818
5075 Waterford Water CIP 736,815 736,815
5076 Hickman Water CIP 41,497 41,497
5090 Waterford Public Financing Authority 281,234 72,028 353,262 6310 CIP Streets (3) (243,352) (243,352)
6320 CIP Streets Measure L 330,385 330,385
6580 CIP Parks (3) (1,123) (1,123)
$ 9,029,294 $ 863 $ 72,028 $ 9,102,185
From Summary: $ 9,102,185
Difference - $
(1) Revenues will come with the property tax allocations from Stanislaus County.
(2) Operations will offset shortfalls in CIP reserves.
(3) Grant funds are pending to cover the deficit.

General Business 6a
May 19, 2022
Patricia Krause, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk City Council Staff Report
Resolution: Approving Resolution 2022-26, Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a General Municipal Election to be Held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the Election of Certain Officers as Required by the Provisions of the Laws of the State of California Relating to General Law Cities
and
Resolution: Approving Resolution 2022-27, Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus to Consolidate a General Municipal Election to be Held on November 8, 2022, with the Statewide General Election to be Held on the Date Pursuant to Section 10403 of the Elections Code
and
Resolution: Approving Resolution 2022-28, Adopting Regulations For Candidates for Elective Office Pertaining to Candidate Statements Submitted to the Voters at an Election to be Held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022
SUMMARY:

Approve resolutions calling for a General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022; requesting the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors to Consolidate with the General Election conducted on that date, and requesting the County Registrar of Voters provide election services; and adopting regulations related to deposits required for the printing of candidate statements.

ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to WMC §1.20.010, the City of Waterford conducts its municipal election on the same day as the Statewide General Election, which is the Tuesday following the first Monday of November in each even-numbered year.

Every regular election year, Council adopts resolutions calling for the November election and requesting consolidation and election services from Stanislaus County. By consolidating the City’s General Municipal Election with the County, the cost of holding the election is much lower due to the combining of resources for certain services.

The terms of Mayor Jose Aldaco, Council Member Joseph Ewing, III and Councilmember Elizabeth Talbott will expire in December 2022, and thus three seats will be up for election. The office of Mayor will be elected for a full term of 2 years and two (2) City Councilmembers will be elected to full terms of four (4) years.

The timeline for potential candidates is as follows:

July 18 - Filling Period: Candidates may take out nomination papers from the City Clerk during August 12 this period, collect signatures, and file their completed papers with the City Clerk.

August 13 - Extended Filing Period: If all incumbents do not file for candidacy, the deadline for August 17 NON- incumbents is extended to this date.

November 8 Election Day
In addition to the resolutions calling for an election and requesting consolidation with the County, the third resolution outlines the Council’s policy with regard to candidate statements and reimbursement to the City for the expense of printing those statements.

The County has estimated the cost for printing a candidate statement in the sample ballot to be $750.00. This is an estimate only. The City will collect the $750 as a deposit and any cost higher than that will be billed to the candidate. If the cost of printing the statements comes in lower, candidates will receive a refund of the remaining deposit funds.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The estimated cost of the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election is $11,000.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Direct staff to make amendments and bring the resolutions back for Council consideration at a later date.

2. Provide other direction to Staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2022-26 – Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022.

2. Resolution 2022-27 – Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus to Consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022.

3. Resolution 2022-28 – Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Elective Office Pertaining to Candidates Statements Submitted to the Voters at an Election to be Held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022.

4. Notice of Election to be published in the Waterford News on Tuesday, July 5, 2022.

Resolution 2022-26

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION #2022-26
APPROVING RESOLUTION 2022-26, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE

HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY

THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO

GENERAL LAW CITIES
WHEREAS, Waterford Municipal Code 1.20.010 stipulates that a General Municipal Election be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of even-numbered years in conjunction with the Statewide General Election; and
WHEREAS, the date of the next City election is November 8, 2022, for the election of two members of the City Council and a Mayor of the City of Waterford, which need to be decided by the voters of the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Election Code sections 1002, 10242, 10263, 10403, and 10418 the City initiates the election process by adopting a Resolution calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATERFORD HEREBY DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities, there is hereby called and ordered to be held in the City of Waterford, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing a Mayor for the full term of two (2) years; and two (2) Members of the City Council for the full term of four years.

SECTION 2. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.

SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to coordinate with the County of Stanislaus Registrar of Voters to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

SECTION 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law.

SECTION 5. The polls for the election shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the elections code.

SECTION 6. The City Council authorizes the City Clerk to administer said election and all reasonable and actual election expenses shall be paid by the City upon presentation of a properly submitted bill.

Resolution 2022-26
SECTION 7. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Waterford, California at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of May 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF WATERFORD
Jose Aldaco
Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia Krause, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Corbett J. Browning
City Attorney
Resolution 2022-27

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION #2022-27
APROVING RESOLUTION 2022-27, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF

THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE PURSUANT TO §10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Waterford called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022, for the purpose of the election of a Mayor and two (2) Members of the City Council, and;
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the city the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the county election department of the County of Stanislaus canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATERFORD DOES DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Pursuant to the requirements of §10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the purpose of the election of a Mayor and two (2) Members of the City Council.

SECTION 2. The County election department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. The election will be held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election.

SECTION 3. The Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the County election department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

SECTION 4. The City shall reimburse the County for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the Stanislaus County Election Department.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Waterford, California at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of May 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN

CITY OF WATERFORD
Jose Aldaco
Mayor
Resolution 2022-27
ATTEST:

Patricia Krause, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Corbett J. Browning
City Attorney
Resolution 2022-28

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION #2022-28
APPROVING RESOLUTION 2022-28, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR

CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES

STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022
WHEREAS, §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidates statement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATERFORD DOES HEREBY DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of Waterford on November 8, 2022 may prepare a candidate’s statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be filed [in typewritten form] in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate’s nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period.

SECTION 2. FOREIGN LANGUAGE POLICY. The County will print and mail sample ballots and candidates statements to all voters in Spanish. The County will make the sample ballots and candidates statements in the required languages available at all polling places, on the County’s website, and in the Election Official’s office.

SECTION 3. PAYMENT. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in English in the main voter pamphlet.

SECTION 4. Estimate of Printing Costs
The estimated cost for printing of a candidate’s statement for the November 8, 2022 main voter pamphlet is $750.00. The City Clerk shall require each candidate filing a statement to pay $750.00 in advance as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter’s pamphlet. The estimate is only an approximation of the actual cost. Costs vary from one election to another and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the clerk may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. The balance must be received in full before the start of the 10-day Public Examination Period for Statement of Qualifications. In the event of overpayment, the clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election.

SECTION 5. MISCELLANEOUS. The City Clerk shall comply with all recommendations and standards set forth by the California Secretary of State regarding occupational designations and other matters relating to elections.

SECTION 6. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a Resolution 2022-28
copy of this Resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued.

SECTION 8. All previous resolutions establishing council policy on payment for candidates’ statements are repealed.

SECTION 9. That this resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 8, 2022 and shall then be repealed.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Waterford, California at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of May 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF WATERFORD
Jose Aldaco
Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia Krause, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Corbett J. Browning
City Attorney

NOTICE OF ELECTION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a General Municipal Election will be held in the City of Waterford on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the following Officers:

MAYOR For a Full Term of two (2) years
TWO (2) MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL For a Full Term of four (4) years The nomination period for these offices begins on July 18, 2022 and closes on August 12, 2022 at 5:00PM.

If nomination papers for an incumbent officer of the city are not filed by August 12, 2022 by 5:00PM, (the 88th day before the election), the voters shall have until August 17, 2022 by 5:00PM, (the 83rd day before the election), to nominate candidates other than the person(s) who are the incumbents on the 88th day before the election, for that incumbent’s elective office.

This extension is not applicable where there is no incumbent eligible to be elected.

If no one or only one person is nominated for an elective office, appointment to the elective office may be made as prescribed by § 10229, Elections Code of the State of California.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following measures are to be voted on at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Waterford on November 8, 2022:

BALLOT MEASURE
Shall the elective mayor for the City of
Waterford serve a four-year term?
Yes
No
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of Elections Code of the State of California, that July 28, 2022 is hereby fixed as the final date on which an argument for or against the above measures appearing on the ballot for election of November 8, 2022, may be submitted, and August 5 2022, is the final date on which a rebuttal to the arguments may be submitted to the City Clerk, 101 E Street, Waterford, California, for printing and distribution to the voters as provided by law.

Arguments may not exceed 300 words; Rebuttals may not exceed 250 words. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9285(a)(2): “The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to a city measure may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument or may authorize in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit, or sign the rebuttal argument.” The passage requirement for the above measure is by Majority Vote (50% +1).

Patricia Krause, CMC, City Clerk
Dated: xxx
General Business 6b
May 19, 2022
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager City Council Staff Report
Resolution: Adopting Resolution 2022-29, Confirming the Annual Engineers Report and Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect an Assessment of $11.24 per Parcel for the Waterford Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and Setting a Public Hearing date for June 16, 2022.

SUMMARY:

Approve a resolution confirming the annual engineer’s report for the Lighting Assessment District and declare the City’s intention to collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-2023.

ANALYSIS:

Stanislaus County formed a Lighting Assessment District (LAD) in 1920 pursuant to the Streets and Highway Code Section 22500 by a vote of the people, hereinafter referred to as "Act". The LAD includes properties as shown in the Lighting Assessment District Map of the City of Waterford which is on file at City Hall and available for public inspection.

The Act allows the District to collect assessments to be used to finance the construction, operation, maintenance, and service of street lighting and appurtenant facilities; including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory completion of improvements.

This is the second step of a three-step process to get the annual assessments on the County tax roll. In order to collect the assessments, the Act requires that an engineer prepare a report which refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation, specifies the fiscal year to which it applies and contains the plans and specifications for the improvements, an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram for the assessment district, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements.

The City has retained NBS for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the Assessment Districts and to prepare and file an Annual Report. NBS has prepared and submitted the Annual Engineer’s Report for the Waterford Lighting Assessment District for Council’s consideration and approval. If approved, staff asks that Council declare their intention to levy and collect the assessments to pay the costs of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and set a public hearing to be held at the Council Meeting of June 16, 2022 to confirm the assessments and order the levy.

The City of Waterford previously established an assessment for the Lighting District of $11.24 per parcel for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 by Waterford City Council Resolution #2021-24, which is the maximum amount allowed. Although the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Engineer’s Report outlines that the fund is currently operating at a deficit, the report recommends that Council approve the assessment amount of $11.24 per parcel for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

RESOLUTION 2022-29

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION #2022-29

RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO LEVY AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S

REPORT FOR THE WATERFORD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, Stanislaus County the “County” formed a Lighting Assessment District in 1920 pursuant to the Streets and Highway Code Section 18000, by a vote of the people, hereinafter referred to as the "Act"; and WHEREAS, the Lighting Assessment District includes those properties as described in the Lighting Assessment District Map of the City of Waterford, which is on file with the City Clerk and open for public inspection, and is designated the Waterford Lighting Assessment District, hereinafter referred to as "District'; and
WHEREAS, the District may collect assessments to be used to finance expenses for streets and sidewalks for the capital cost or maintenance and operational expenses of installation, servicing, and maintenance of public owned or leased lighting, including but not limited to traffic signals and any appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to land preparation, light equipment and their servicing and maintenance; and WHEREAS, the City of Waterford, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, has determined and certifies that the charges are either exempt from or in compliance with all the provisions of Proposition 218 which was passed by the voters in November 1996. The City has further determined the charges are in compliance with all laws pertaining to the levy of such charges; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to continue to levy an assessment for the fiscal year 2022-2023 $11.24 Benefit Unit; and
WHEREAS, the intended assessment is not greater than the assessment in existence on November 6, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service facilities or regulatory activity for which the assessment is levied; and WHEREAS, the assessment will be confirmed and established annually by a noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, the setting of the assessment will be confirmed and established at a noticed public hearing to be held at or after 6:30 p.m. on June 16, 2022, at a regular meeting of the Waterford City Council at the Waterford City Hall Council Chambers, 101 E Street, Waterford, CA 95386; and WHEREAS, an engineer will prepare a report which refers to the District by its distinctive designation, specifies the fiscal year to which it applies and contains plans and specifications for the improvements and an estimate of the cost of improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report submitted to the City Clerk refers to the District by its distinctive designation, the Waterford Lighting Assessment District, specifies the fiscal year to which the report applies and, with respect to that year, contains all of the following: (a) plans and specifications of the improvements; (b) an estimate of the costs of improvements; (c) a diagram for the District; and, (d) an assessment of the established costs of the improvements; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2022-xx, a Resolution of Intent was approved by the City Council on May 19, 2022 wherein a public hearing was scheduled for June 16, 2022.

RESOLUTION 2022-29
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City Council confirms the Engineer's Report is submitted to the City Clerk;

2. The City Council declares its intent to levy and collect assessments for the District for the 2022-2023 fiscal year; and

3. The assessment is levied without regard to property valuations; and

4. The assessment is in compliance with the Act; and

5. The City Council shall hold a noticed public hearing on the setting of the proposed assessment on June 16, 2022 at or after 6:30 pm., at a regularly scheduled meeting at the Waterford City Hall Council Chambers 101 E Street, Waterford, CA 95386.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Waterford, County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 19, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

City of Waterford,
Jose M. Aldaco, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia Krause, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Corbett J. Browning, City Attorney
FISCAL IMPACT:

The report recommends an assessment of $11.24 per parcel located within the Waterford Lighting Assessment District for FY 2022-23 to fund the Lighting Assessment District (Fund # 2230 - Lighting Assessment District Revenues). This rate structure has been in place since the City’s incorporation.

With increasing costs and projects, the revenue of $11.24 per parcel is not sustainable and the fund is currently is operating at an increasing deficit. Any effort by the City to authorize an increase to the maximum amount of $11.24 would be subject to Proposition 218 proceedings.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Direct Staff to work with the consultant to determine a rate that would adequately fund the Lighting Assessment District and initiate the Proposition 218 process.

2. Provide other direction to Staff.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Resolution #2022-29
• Annual Engineer’s Report for the Waterford Lighting Assessment District for FY 2022-23 nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report For:

Lighting Assessment District
May 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. ENGINEER’S LETTER ........................................................................................................1

2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ...........................................................................................2

2.1 Description of the Boundaries ..................................................................................2

2.2 Description of Improvements and Services ..............................................................2

3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS .......................................................................................................3

4. ASSESSMENTS ................................................................................................................4

4.1 Method of Apportionment........................................................................................4

4.2 Maximum Annual Assessment..................................................................................4

5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM..................................................................................................5

6. ASSESSMENT ROLL..........................................................................................................6 City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report- Lighting Assessment District 1

1. ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, Stanislaus County (the “County”), State of California, formed a Lighting Assessment District in 1920 pursuant to the Street Lighting Act of 1919 (the “Act”). The assessment district is known as Lighting Assessment District (the “District”) of the City of Waterford (the “City”); and WHEREAS, the City directed NBS to prepare and file an annual Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements to be maintained and an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the aforementioned District for Fiscal Year 2022/23; and WHEREAS, this Report includes a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, and the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and
WHEREAS, the assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2022/23 are in accordance with the assessment methodology as confirmed by the City Council and are proportional to the special benefit received by each parcel. The amount to be assessed to each parcel is equal to or less than the maximum assessment rate allowed prior to the passage of Proposition 218.

NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance, operation, and servicing of said improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the District:

FY 2022/23 SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT
Description Amount
Balance to Levy $9,329.20
Total Number of Benefit Units 830
Assessment Per Benefit Unit $11.24
City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report- Lighting Assessment District 2

2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and specifications for the improvements were prepared by MCR Engineering, Inc.

2.1 Description of the Boundaries
Please refer to Section 5 for the boundaries of the District. The County Assessor's maps of the areas are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

2.2 Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements include the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of street lighting and appurtenant facilities; including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these improvements.

City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report- Lighting Assessment District 3

3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the improvements as described in Section 2.2 are summarized in the table below. Estimated expenditures are shown along with the incidental expenses to be funded by the District.

The budget for the District for Fiscal Year 2022/23 is as follows:

EXPENSES
Description FY 2022/23 Budget
Energy Cost $14,861.00
Electrolier Repair/Replace (131 Electroliers) 4,900.00
Legal, Accounting, and General Administration 2,500
Total Expenses $22,261.00

OTHER REVENUES
Description FY 2022/23 Budget
Secured Property Tax Revenue Anticipated (1) $12,931.80 Total Revenue $12,931.80
(1) Per the City, revenue expected from County apportionment of Secured Property Tax.

COSTS TO BE ASSESSED
Description FY 2022/23 Budget
Total Expenses $22,261.00
LESS Other Revenues (12,931.80)
Total $9,329.20
Maximum Allowable Assessment Revenue (1) $9,329.20
LESS Total Expenses (9,329.20)
Surplus/(Shortfall) $0.00
(1) Does not include County Collection fee of $0.20, added by Stanislaus County Auditor-Controller.

City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report- Lighting Assessment District 4

4. ASSESSMENTS
The assessments for Fiscal Year 2022/23 apportioned to each parcel, as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office, are listed in Section 6 of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor and is, by reference, made part of this Report.

4.1 Method of Apportionment
Pursuant to the Act, the costs of the District may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed, among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each such parcel from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of the improvements. The assessment formula used for the District reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly proportion the costs based on the estimated benefits to each parcel.

The manner in which the Engineer has apportioned the annual assessment to each parcel in the District is by Benefit Unit (“BU”). Each commercial parcel or parcel capable of containing a residence within the District derives equal special benefit from the improvements; therefore, each such assessable parcel shall be assessed one BU. The amount assessed for each parcel equals: “Total assessment divided by the total number of BUs multiplied by the number of BUs on such parcel.” There are currently 64 parcels within the District that are currently being assessed under the City’s Landscape and Lighting Assessment District and, therefore, cannot be assessed twice for lighting. These 64 parcels are exempt from the District assessment and are not included in the Assessment Roll.

4.2 Maximum Annual Assessment
The maximum annual assessment levied on all properties within the District is not subject to annual escalation. The annual assessment shall not exceed the maximum assessment unless the appropriate Proposition 218 proceedings are conducted by the City to authorize an increase beyond the maximum assessment amount.

The following table summarizes the proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2022/23:

Benefit Units
(BUs)
Maximum Rate
Per BU
Proposed Rate
Per BU
830 $11.24 $11.24
City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report- Lighting Assessment District 5

5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following page shows the boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions, as well as the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers shown on maps of the County Assessor for the current year are, by reference, made part of this Report.

City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report- Lighting Assessment District 6

6. ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessor’s parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be based on the Stanislaus County Assessor’s secured roll data for the applicable year in which this Report is prepared and is incorporated herein by reference.

A listing of assessor’s parcels assessed within the District for Fiscal Year 2022/23, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on Stanislaus County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the Stanislaus County Auditor/Controller.

The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount.

General Business 6c
May 19, 2022
Patricia Krause, City Clerk/ Assistant to the City Manager City Council Staff Report
Resolution: Adopting Resolution 2022-30, Confirming the Annual Engineers Report and Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect an Assessment of $52.00 per Parcel (Zone A) and $28.52 (Zone B) for the Waterford Landscape and Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and Setting a Public Hearing date for June 16, 2022.

SUMMARY:

Approve a resolution confirming the annual engineer’s report for the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District and declare the City’s intention to collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

ANALYSIS:

The Waterford Landscape and Lighting Assessment District (LLAD) was formed in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500), hereinafter referred to as "Act". The LLAD is split into two zones (“Zone A” and “Zone B”) delineated on the Lighting and Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Map of the City of Waterford, which is on file at City Hall and available for public inspection.

The Act allows the District to collect assessments to be used to finance the construction, operation, maintenance, and service of street lighting, landscaping, median landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water and gas, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory completion of improvements.

This is the second step of a three step process to get the annual assessments on the County tax roll. In order to collect the assessments, the Act requires that an engineer prepare a report which refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation, specifies the fiscal year to which it applies and contains the plans and specifications for the improvements, an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram for the assessment district, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements.

The City has retained NBS for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the Assessment Districts and to prepare and file an Annual Report. NBS has prepared and submitted the Annual Engineer’s Report for the Waterford Landscape and Lighting Assessment District for Council’s consideration and approval. If approved, staff asks that Council declare their intention to levy and collect the assessments to pay the costs of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and set a public hearing to be held at the Council Meeting of June 16, 2022 to confirm the assessments and order the levy.

The City of Waterford previously established an assessment for the Landscape and Lighting District of $52.00 per parcel in “Zone A” and $28.52 per parcel in “Zone B” for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 by Waterford City Council Resolution #2021-25, which is the maximum amount allowed. Although the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Engineer’s Report outlines that the fund is currently operating at a deficit, the report recommends that Council approve the assessment amount of $52.00 per parcel in “Zone A” and $28.52 per parcel in “Zone B” for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

The report recommends an assessment of $52.00 per parcel in “Zone A” and $28.52 per parcel in “Zone B” located within the Waterford Landscape and Lighting Assessment District for FY 2022-23 to fund the District (Fund # 2210 – Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Revenues). This rate structure has been in place since 1991. With increasing costs and projects, the recommended assessments will not provide adequate revenue, and the Fund will continue to operate at an increasing deficit. Any effort by the City to authorize an increase assessment amounts would be subject to Proposition 218 proceedings.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Direct Staff to work with the consultant to determine a rate that would adequately fund the Lighting Assessment District and initiate the Proposition 218 process

2. Provide other direction to Staff.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Resolution #2022-30
• Annual Engineer’s Report for the Waterford Landscape and Lighting Assessment District for FY 2022-23
RESOLUTION 2022-30

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. #2022-30

A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO LEVY AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S

REPORT FOR THE WATERFORD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, the City of Waterford (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) formed the City of Waterford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972, hereinafter referred to as the "Act"; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, hereinafter referred to as the “District” includes those properties as described in the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Boundary Map of the City of Waterford, which is on file with the City Clerk and open for public inspection, and is designated the Waterford Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District, by Ordinance No. 90-07; and WHEREAS, the District may collect assessments from those parcels pursuant to a Petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was imposed to be used to finance; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined and certifies that the charges are either exempt from or in compliance with all the provisions of Proposition 218 which was passed by the voters in November 1996. The City has further determined the charges are in compliance with all laws pertaining to the levy of such charges; and WHEREAS, the assessment is imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks and streets for improvements as set forth in Streets and Highways Code Section 22525; incidental expenses, Streets and Highways Code Section 22526; maintain or maintenance as set forth in Streets and Highways Code Section 22531; public places as defined in Streets and Highways Code Section 22535, and for any other purposes authorized by the Act consistent with Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to continue to levy an assessment for the fiscal year 2022-2023 of $52.00 per Benefit Unit within Zone A and $28.52 per Benefit Unit within Zone B; and WHEREAS, the intended assessment is not greater than the assessment in existence on November 6, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service facilities or regulatory activity for which the assessment is levied; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that the assessment be confirmed and established annually by a noticed public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the setting of the assessment will be confirmed and established at a noticed public hearing to be held at or after 6:30 p.m. on June 16, 2022, at a regular meeting of the Waterford City Council at the Waterford City Hall Council Chambers, 101 E Street, Waterford, CA 95386; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that an engineer prepare a report which refers to the District by its distinctive designation, specifies the fiscal year to which it applies and contains plans and specifications for the improvements and an estimate of the cost of improvements; and WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report submitted to the City Clerk refers to the District by its distinctive designation, the Waterford Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District, specifies the fiscal year to which the report applies and, with respect to that year, contains all of the following: (a) plans and specifications of the improvements; (b) an estimate of the costs of improvements; (c) a diagram for the District; and, (d) an RESOLUTION 2022-30
assessment of the established costs of the improvements; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2022-xx, a Resolution of Intent was approved by the City Council on May 19, 2022 wherein a public hearing was scheduled for June 16, 2022.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City Council confirms the Engineer's Report is submitted to the City Clerk;

2. The City Council declares its intent to levy and collect assessments for the District for the 2022-2023 fiscal year;

3. The assessment is levied without regard to property valuations;

4. The assessment is in compliance with the Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et. seq.; and

5. The City Council shall hold a noticed public hearing on the setting of the proposed assessment on June 16, 2022 at or after 6:30 pm., at a regularly scheduled meeting at the Waterford City Hall Council Chambers 101 E Street, Waterford, CA 95386.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Waterford, County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 19, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

City of Waterford,
Jose M. Aldaco, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patricia Krause, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Corbett J. Browning, City Attorney
nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report For:

Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
May 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENGINEER’S LETTER ........................................................................................................1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ...........................................................................................2

2.1 Description of Boundaries.........................................................................................2

2.2 Description of Improvements and Services ..............................................................2 ESTIMATE OF COSTS .......................................................................................................3 ASSESSMENTS ................................................................................................................4

4.1 Method of Apportionment........................................................................................4

4.2 Maximum Annual Assessments ................................................................................4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM..................................................................................................5 ASSESSMENT ROLL..........................................................................................................6 City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report– Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 1 ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, the City of Waterford (the “City”), State of California, formed the Waterford Landscape and Lighting Assessment District (the “District”) in 1991 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the City retained NBS to prepare and file an annual Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements to be maintained and an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2022/23; and WHEREAS, this Report includes a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, and the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and
WHEREAS, the assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2022/23 are in accordance with the assessment methodology as confirmed by the City Council and are proportional to the special benefit received by each parcel. The amount to be assessed to each parcel is equal to or less than the maximum assessment rate allowed prior to the passage of Proposition 218.

NOW THEREFORE, the following assessments are made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance, operation, and servicing of said improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the District:

FY 2022/23 SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENTS
Description Zone A Amount Zone B Amount
Balance to Levy $62,764.00 $4,819.88
Total Number of Benefit Units 1,207 169
Assessment Per Benefit Unit $52.00 $28.52
City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report– Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 2

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and specifications for the improvements were prepared by MCR Engineering, Inc.

2.1 Description of Boundaries
Please refer to Section 5 for the boundaries of the District. The Stanislaus County (the “County”) Assessor's maps of the areas are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

2.2 Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements include the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of street lighting, landscaping, median landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water and gas, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these improvements.

The District has been divided into two zones, Zone A and Zone B (together the “Zones”), based on subareas that receive differing degrees of benefit.

City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report– Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 3

ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the improvements as described in Section 2.2 are summarized in the table below. Estimated expenditures are shown along with the incidental expenses to be funded by the District. The budget for each of the Zones in the District for Fiscal Year 2022/23 is as follows:

ZONE A BUDGET
Description FY 2022/23 Budget
Energy Cost $12,500.00
Electrolier Repair/Replace (normal maintenance) 3,000.00 Electrolier Repair/Replace (major repair reserve) 0.00
Graffiti Removal 250.00
Landscaping (water, material, labor & equipment) 59,354.00 Zone A Subtotal $75,104.00
Administration Reporting Fees $14,398.00
Other Administration 4,000.00
Engineering, Audit, and Legal 150.00
Total Expenses $93,652.00
Maximum Allowable Assessment Revenue $62,764.00
LESS Total Expenses ($93,652.00)
Surplus/(Shortfall) ($30,888.00)

ZONE B BUDGET
Description FY 2022/23 Budget
Energy Costs $1,000.00
Electrolier Repair/Replace 1,000.00
Rebate to WLD (1) 0.00
Total Expenses $2,000.00
Maximum Allowable Assessment Revenue $4,819.88
LESS Total Expenses (2,000.00)
Surplus/(Shortfall) $2,819.88
(1) Per the City, there will be no rebate to the City’s Lighting Assessment District for FY 2022/23.

ZONES A AND B COMBINED BUDGET
Description FY 2022/23 Budget
Maximum Allowable Assessment Revenue (1) $67,583.88
LESS Total Expenses (95,652.00)
Surplus/(Shortfall) ($28,068.12)

RESERVE FUND BALANCES
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance $39,745.00
Fund Balance Change (28,068.12)
Estimated Ending Fund Balance as of June 30, 2022 $11,676.88 (1) Does not include County Collection fee of $0.20, added by Stanislaus County Auditor-Controller.

City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report– Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 4

ASSESSMENTS
The assessments for Fiscal Year 2022/23 apportioned to each parcel, as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office, are listed in Section 6 of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor and are, by reference, made part of this Report.

4.1 Method of Apportionment
Pursuant to the Act, the costs of the District may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed, among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each such parcel from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of the improvements. The assessment formula used for the District reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly proportion the costs based on the estimated benefits to each parcel.

The manner in which the Engineer has apportioned the annual assessment to each parcel in the District is by Benefit Unit (“BU”). Each commercial parcel or parcel capable of containing a residence within the District derives equal special benefit from the improvements; therefore, each such assessable parcel shall be assessed one BU. The amount assessed for each parcel equals: “Total assessment divided by the total number of BUs multiplied by the number of BUs on such parcel.”

4.2 Maximum Annual Assessments
The maximum annual assessments levied on all properties within the District are not subject to annual escalation. The annual assessment shall not exceed the maximum assessment unless the appropriate Proposition 218 proceedings are conducted by the City to authorize an increase beyond the maximum assessment amount.

The following table summarizes the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2022/23:

Benefit Zone
Benefit Units
(BUs)
Maximum Rate
Per BU
Proposed Rate
Per BU
Zone A 1,207 $52.00 $52.00
Zone B 169 28.52 28.52
City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report– Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 5

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following page shows the boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions, as well as the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers shown on maps of the County Assessor for the current year are, by reference, made part of this Report.

City of Waterford
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Engineer’s Report– Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 6

ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessor’s parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be based on the Stanislaus County Assessor’s secured roll data for the applicable year in which this Report is prepared and is incorporated herein by reference.

A listing of assessor’s parcels assessed within the District for Fiscal Year 2022/23, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on Stanislaus County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the Stanislaus County Auditor/Controller.

The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount.

City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
4 080-017-001-000 101 008005 A 1 $52.00
5 080-017-002-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
6 080-017-003-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
7 080-017-004-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
8 080-017-005-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
9 080-017-006-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
10 080-017-007-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
11 080-017-008-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
12 080-017-009-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
13 080-017-010-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
14 080-017-011-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
15 080-017-012-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
16 080-017-013-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
17 080-017-014-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
18 080-017-015-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
19 080-017-016-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
20 080-017-017-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
21 080-017-018-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
22 080-017-019-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
23 080-017-020-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
24 080-017-021-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
25 080-017-022-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
26 080-017-023-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
27 080-017-024-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
28 080-017-025-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
29 080-017-026-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
30 080-017-027-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
31 080-017-028-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
32 080-017-029-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
33 080-017-030-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
34 080-017-031-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
35 080-017-032-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
36 080-017-033-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
37 080-017-034-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
38 080-017-035-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
39 080-017-036-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
40 080-017-037-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
41 080-017-038-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
42 080-017-039-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
43 080-017-040-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
44 080-017-041-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
45 080-017-042-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
46 080-017-043-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
47 080-017-044-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
48 080-017-045-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
49 080-017-046-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
50 080-017-047-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
51 080-017-048-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
52 080-017-049-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
53 080-018-001-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
54 080-018-002-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
55 080-018-003-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
56 080-018-004-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
57 080-018-005-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
58 080-018-006-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
59 080-018-007-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
60 080-018-008-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
61 080-018-009-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
62 080-018-010-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
63 080-018-011-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
64 080-018-012-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
65 080-018-013-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
66 080-018-014-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
67 080-018-015-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
68 080-018-016-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
69 080-018-017-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
70 080-018-018-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
71 080-018-019-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
72 080-018-020-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
73 080-018-021-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
74 080-018-022-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
75 080-018-023-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
76 080-018-024-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
77 080-018-025-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
78 080-018-026-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
79 080-018-027-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
80 080-018-028-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
81 080-018-029-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
82 080-018-030-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
83 080-018-031-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
84 080-018-032-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
86 080-018-035-000 121 008005 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
87 080-018-036-000 121 008005 A 1 52.00
88 080-019-001-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
89 080-019-011-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
90 080-019-012-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
91 080-019-018-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
92 080-019-019-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
93 080-019-020-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
94 080-019-021-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
95 080-019-022-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
96 080-019-023-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
97 080-019-024-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
98 080-019-025-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
99 080-019-026-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
100 080-019-027-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
101 080-019-028-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
102 080-019-029-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
103 080-019-030-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
104 080-019-031-000 111 008034 A 1 52.00
105 080-019-032-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
106 080-019-033-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
107 080-019-034-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
108 080-019-035-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
109 080-019-036-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
110 080-019-037-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
111 080-020-001-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
112 080-020-002-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
113 080-020-003-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
114 080-020-009-000 202 008005 A 1 52.00
115 080-020-011-000 111 008034 A 1 52.00
116 080-020-012-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
117 080-020-013-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
118 080-020-014-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
119 080-020-015-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
120 080-020-016-000 111 008034 A 1 52.00
121 080-020-017-000 121 008034 A 1 52.00
122 080-020-018-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
123 080-020-019-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
124 080-020-020-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
125 080-020-021-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
126 080-020-022-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
127 080-020-023-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
128 080-020-024-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
129 080-020-025-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
130 080-020-026-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
131 080-020-027-000 111 008034 A 1 52.00
132 080-020-028-000 101 008034 A 1 52.00
133 080-025-001-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
134 080-025-004-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
135 080-025-005-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
136 080-025-006-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
137 080-025-007-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
138 080-025-008-000 111 008039 A 1 52.00
139 080-025-009-000 111 008039 A 1 52.00
140 080-025-011-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
1223 080-025-013-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1224 080-025-014-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
141 080-025-015-000 121 008038 A 1 52.00
142 080-025-016-000 101 008038 A 1 52.00
143 080-025-017-000 111 008038 A 1 52.00
144 080-025-018-000 101 008038 A 1 52.00
145 080-025-019-000 101 008038 A 1 52.00
146 080-025-020-000 101 008038 A 1 52.00
147 080-025-021-000 101 008038 A 1 52.00
148 080-025-022-000 101 008038 A 1 52.00
149 080-025-023-000 122 008038 A 1 52.00
150 080-025-024-000 101 008038 A 1 52.00
151 080-025-025-000 101 008038 A 1 52.00
152 080-025-026-000 121 008039 A 1 52.00
153 080-025-027-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
154 080-025-028-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
155 080-025-029-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
156 080-025-030-000 101 008039 A 1 52.00
1225 080-026-002-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1226 080-026-003-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1227 080-026-004-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1228 080-026-005-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1229 080-026-007-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1230 080-026-008-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1231 080-026-009-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1232 080-026-010-000 111 008003 B 1 28.52
1233 080-026-011-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1234 080-026-012-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 4 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1235 080-026-013-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1236 080-026-014-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
157 080-027-001-000 111 008011 A 1 52.00
158 080-027-002-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
159 080-027-003-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
160 080-027-004-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
161 080-027-005-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
162 080-027-006-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
163 080-027-007-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
164 080-027-008-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
165 080-027-009-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
166 080-027-010-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
167 080-027-011-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
168 080-027-012-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
169 080-027-013-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
170 080-027-014-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
171 080-027-015-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
172 080-027-016-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
173 080-027-017-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
174 080-027-018-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
175 080-027-019-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
176 080-027-020-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
177 080-027-021-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
178 080-027-022-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
179 080-027-023-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
180 080-027-024-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
181 080-027-025-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
182 080-027-026-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
183 080-027-027-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
184 080-027-028-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
185 080-027-029-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
186 080-027-030-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
187 080-027-031-000 111 008011 A 1 52.00
188 080-027-032-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
189 080-027-033-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
190 080-027-034-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
191 080-027-035-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
192 080-027-036-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
193 080-027-037-000 101 008011 A 1 52.00
1237 080-027-038-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1238 080-027-039-000 101 008017 B 1 28.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 5 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1239 080-027-040-000 101 008017 B 1 28.52
1240 080-027-041-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1241 080-027-042-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1242 080-027-043-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1243 080-027-044-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1244 080-027-045-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1245 080-027-046-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1246 080-027-049-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1247 080-027-051-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
194 080-028-001-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
195 080-028-002-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
196 080-028-003-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
197 080-028-004-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
198 080-028-005-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
199 080-028-006-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
200 080-028-007-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
201 080-028-008-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
202 080-028-009-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
203 080-028-010-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
204 080-028-011-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
205 080-028-012-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
206 080-028-013-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
207 080-028-014-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
208 080-028-015-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
209 080-028-016-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
210 080-028-017-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
211 080-028-018-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
212 080-028-019-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
213 080-028-020-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
214 080-028-021-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
215 080-028-022-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
216 080-028-023-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
217 080-028-024-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
218 080-028-025-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
219 080-028-026-000 111 008029 A 1 52.00
220 080-028-027-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
221 080-028-028-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
222 080-028-029-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
223 080-028-030-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
224 080-028-031-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
225 080-028-032-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 6 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
226 080-028-033-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
227 080-028-034-000 101 008029 A 1 52.00
228 080-030-027-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
229 080-030-028-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
230 080-030-029-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
231 080-030-030-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
232 080-030-031-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
233 080-030-032-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
234 080-030-033-000 111 008033 A 1 52.00
235 080-030-034-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
236 080-030-035-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
237 080-030-036-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
238 080-030-037-000 111 008033 A 1 52.00
239 080-030-038-000 010 008033 A 1 52.00
240 080-030-039-000 010 008033 A 1 52.00
241 080-030-040-000 010 008033 A 1 52.00
242 080-030-041-000 101 008033 A 1 52.00
243 080-030-042-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
244 080-030-043-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
245 080-030-044-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
246 080-030-045-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
247 080-030-046-000 111 008003 A 1 52.00
248 080-030-047-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
249 080-030-048-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
250 080-030-049-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
251 080-030-050-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1248 080-030-051-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1249 080-030-054-000 141 008031 B 1 28.52
252 080-030-055-000 121 008031 A 1 52.00
253 080-030-056-000 111 008031 A 1 52.00
254 080-030-057-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
255 080-030-058-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
256 080-030-059-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
257 080-030-060-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
258 080-030-061-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
259 080-030-062-000 111 008003 A 1 52.00
260 080-030-063-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
261 080-030-064-000 111 008003 A 1 52.00
1250 080-030-065-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1251 080-030-066-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1252 080-030-067-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 7 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1253 080-030-068-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1254 080-030-069-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
262 080-031-045-000 111 008003 A 1 52.00
263 080-031-047-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
264 080-031-048-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
265 080-031-049-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
266 080-031-053-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
267 080-031-054-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
268 080-036-001-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
269 080-036-002-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
270 080-036-003-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
271 080-036-004-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
272 080-036-005-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
273 080-036-006-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
1255 080-036-008-000 171 008005 B 1 28.52
274 080-036-010-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
275 080-036-011-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
276 080-036-012-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
277 080-036-013-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
278 080-036-014-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
279 080-036-015-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
280 080-036-016-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
281 080-036-017-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
282 080-036-018-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
283 080-036-019-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
284 080-036-020-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
285 080-036-026-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
286 080-036-027-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
287 080-036-028-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
288 080-036-029-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
289 080-036-030-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
290 080-036-031-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
291 080-036-032-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
292 080-036-033-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
293 080-036-034-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
294 080-036-035-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
295 080-036-036-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
296 080-036-037-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
297 080-037-003-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
298 080-037-004-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
299 080-037-005-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 8 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
300 080-037-006-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
301 080-037-007-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
302 080-037-008-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
303 080-037-009-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
304 080-037-010-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
305 080-037-011-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
306 080-037-012-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
307 080-037-013-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
308 080-037-014-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
309 080-037-015-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
310 080-037-016-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
311 080-037-017-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
312 080-037-018-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
313 080-038-001-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
314 080-038-002-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
315 080-038-003-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
316 080-038-004-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
317 080-038-005-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
318 080-038-006-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
319 080-038-007-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
320 080-038-008-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
321 080-038-009-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
322 080-038-010-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
323 080-038-011-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
324 080-038-012-000 101 008030 A 1 52.00
1256 080-038-029-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1257 080-038-030-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1258 080-038-031-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1259 080-038-032-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1260 080-038-033-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1261 080-038-034-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1262 080-038-035-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1263 080-038-036-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1264 080-038-037-000 111 008003 B 1 28.52
1265 080-038-038-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
325 080-042-001-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
326 080-042-002-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
327 080-042-003-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
328 080-042-004-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
329 080-042-005-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
330 080-042-006-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 9 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:40PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
331 080-042-009-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
332 080-042-010-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
333 080-042-011-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
334 080-042-012-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
335 080-042-013-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
336 080-042-014-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
337 080-042-015-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
338 080-042-016-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
339 080-042-017-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
340 080-042-018-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
341 080-042-019-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
342 080-042-020-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
343 080-042-021-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
344 080-042-022-000 121 008026 A 1 52.00
345 080-042-023-000 121 008026 A 1 52.00
346 080-042-024-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
347 080-042-025-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
348 080-042-026-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
349 080-042-027-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
350 080-042-028-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
351 080-042-029-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
352 080-042-030-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
353 080-042-031-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
354 080-042-032-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
355 080-042-033-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
356 080-042-034-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
357 080-042-035-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
358 080-042-036-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
359 080-042-037-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
360 080-043-001-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
361 080-043-002-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
362 080-043-003-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
363 080-043-004-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
364 080-043-005-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
365 080-043-006-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
366 080-043-007-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
367 080-043-008-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
368 080-043-009-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
369 080-043-010-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
370 080-043-011-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
371 080-043-012-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 10 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
372 080-043-013-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
373 080-043-014-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
374 080-043-015-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
375 080-043-016-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
376 080-043-017-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
377 080-043-018-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
378 080-043-019-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
379 080-043-020-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
380 080-043-021-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
381 080-043-022-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
382 080-043-023-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
383 080-043-024-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
384 080-043-025-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
385 080-043-026-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
386 080-043-027-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
387 080-043-028-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
388 080-043-029-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
389 080-043-030-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
390 080-043-031-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
391 080-043-032-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
392 080-043-033-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
393 080-043-034-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
394 080-043-035-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
395 080-043-036-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
396 080-043-037-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
397 080-043-038-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
398 080-043-039-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
399 080-043-040-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
400 080-043-041-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
401 080-043-042-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
402 080-043-043-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
403 080-043-044-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
404 080-043-045-000 121 008008 A 1 52.00
405 080-043-046-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
406 080-043-047-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
407 080-043-048-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
408 080-043-049-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
409 080-043-050-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
410 080-043-051-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
411 080-043-052-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
412 080-043-053-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 11 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
413 080-043-054-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
414 080-043-055-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
415 080-043-056-000 111 008008 A 1 52.00
416 080-043-057-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
417 080-043-058-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
418 080-043-059-000 101 008008 A 1 52.00
419 080-043-061-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
420 080-043-062-000 111 008042 A 1 52.00
421 080-043-063-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
422 080-043-064-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
423 080-043-065-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
424 080-043-066-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
425 080-043-067-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
426 080-043-068-000 111 008042 A 1 52.00
427 080-043-069-000 111 008042 A 1 52.00
428 080-043-070-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
429 080-043-071-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
430 080-043-072-000 101 008042 A 1 52.00
431 080-044-001-000 111 008040 A 1 52.00
432 080-044-002-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
433 080-044-003-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
434 080-044-004-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
435 080-044-005-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
436 080-044-006-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
437 080-044-007-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
438 080-044-008-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
439 080-044-009-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
440 080-044-010-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
441 080-044-011-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
442 080-044-012-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
443 080-044-013-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
444 080-044-014-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
445 080-044-015-000 111 008040 A 1 52.00
446 080-044-016-000 111 008040 A 1 52.00
447 080-044-017-000 111 008040 A 1 52.00
448 080-044-018-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
449 080-044-019-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
450 080-044-020-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
451 080-044-021-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
452 080-044-022-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
453 080-044-023-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 12 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
454 080-044-024-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
455 080-044-025-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
456 080-044-026-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
457 080-044-027-000 111 008040 A 1 52.00
458 080-044-028-000 121 008040 A 1 52.00
459 080-044-029-000 121 008040 A 1 52.00
460 080-044-030-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
461 080-044-031-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
462 080-044-032-000 111 008040 A 1 52.00
463 080-044-033-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
464 080-044-034-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
465 080-044-035-000 121 008040 A 1 52.00
466 080-044-036-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
467 080-044-037-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
468 080-044-038-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
469 080-044-039-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
470 080-044-040-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
471 080-044-041-000 101 008040 A 1 52.00
472 080-044-042-000 111 008040 A 1 52.00
1266 080-045-006-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1267 080-045-007-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1268 080-045-008-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1269 080-045-019-000 470 008003 B 1 28.52
1270 080-045-025-000 479 008003 B 1 28.52
1271 080-045-026-000 610 008003 B 1 28.52
1272 080-045-029-000 010 008003 B 1 28.52
1273 080-045-030-000 010 008003 B 1 28.52
1274 080-045-031-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
474 080-045-037-000 410 008043 A 1 52.00
475 080-045-038-000 510 008043 A 1 52.00
1275 080-045-039-000 410 008043 B 1 28.52
1276 080-045-040-000 410 008043 B 1 28.52
1277 080-045-041-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1278 080-045-042-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1279 080-045-043-000 491 008003 B 1 28.52
1280 080-045-044-000 620 008003 B 1 28.52
476 080-045-045-000 400 008043 A 1 52.00
477 080-045-046-000 410 008043 A 1 52.00
478 080-045-047-000 410 008043 A 1 52.00
1281 080-047-004-000 510 008003 B 1 28.52
1282 080-047-005-000 101 008007 B 1 28.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 13 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1283 080-047-006-000 101 008007 B 1 28.52
1284 080-047-019-000 101 008007 B 1 28.52
1285 080-047-020-000 101 008007 B 1 28.52
1286 080-048-018-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1287 080-048-019-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1288 080-048-020-000 111 008001 B 1 28.52
1289 080-048-021-000 111 008001 B 1 28.52
1290 080-049-021-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1291 080-049-022-000 121 008001 B 1 28.52
1292 080-049-023-000 121 008001 B 1 28.52
1293 080-049-024-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1294 080-049-025-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1295 080-049-026-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
479 080-049-029-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
480 080-049-030-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
481 080-049-031-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
482 080-049-032-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
483 080-049-033-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
484 080-049-034-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
485 080-049-035-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
486 080-049-036-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
487 080-049-037-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
488 080-049-038-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
489 080-049-039-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
490 080-049-040-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
491 080-049-041-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
1296 080-050-031-000 101 008024 B 1 28.52
492 080-050-032-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
1297 080-050-034-000 101 008024 B 1 28.52
1298 080-050-035-000 121 008024 B 1 28.52
493 080-050-037-000 101 008024 A 1 52.00
494 080-050-038-000 101 008024 A 1 52.00
495 080-050-039-000 101 008024 A 1 52.00
496 080-050-040-000 101 008024 A 1 52.00
497 080-050-041-000 111 008024 A 1 52.00
498 080-050-042-000 121 008024 A 1 52.00
499 080-050-043-000 101 008024 A 1 52.00
500 080-050-044-000 101 008024 A 1 52.00
501 080-050-045-000 101 008024 A 1 52.00
502 080-050-046-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
503 080-050-047-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 14 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
504 080-050-048-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
505 080-050-049-000 111 008028 A 1 52.00
506 080-050-050-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
507 080-050-051-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
508 080-050-052-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
509 080-050-053-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
510 080-050-054-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
511 080-050-055-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
512 080-050-056-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
513 080-050-057-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
514 080-050-058-000 101 008028 A 1 52.00
515 080-051-001-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
516 080-051-002-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
517 080-051-003-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
518 080-051-004-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
519 080-051-005-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
520 080-051-006-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
521 080-051-007-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
522 080-051-008-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
523 080-051-009-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
524 080-051-010-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
525 080-051-011-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
526 080-051-012-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
527 080-051-013-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
528 080-051-014-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
529 080-051-015-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
530 080-051-016-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
531 080-051-017-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
532 080-051-018-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
533 080-051-019-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
534 080-051-020-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
535 080-051-021-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
536 080-051-022-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
537 080-051-023-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
538 080-051-024-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
539 080-051-025-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
540 080-051-026-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
541 080-051-027-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
542 080-051-028-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
543 080-051-029-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
544 080-051-030-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 15 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
545 080-051-031-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
546 080-051-032-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
547 080-051-033-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
548 080-051-034-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
549 080-051-035-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
550 080-051-036-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
551 080-051-037-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
552 080-051-038-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
553 080-051-039-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
554 080-051-040-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
555 080-051-041-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
556 080-051-042-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
557 080-051-043-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
558 080-051-044-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
559 080-051-045-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
560 080-051-046-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
561 080-051-047-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
562 080-051-048-000 111 008019 A 1 52.00
563 080-051-049-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
564 080-051-050-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
565 080-051-051-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
566 080-051-052-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
567 080-051-053-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
568 080-051-054-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
569 080-051-055-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
570 080-051-056-000 111 008019 A 1 52.00
571 080-051-057-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
572 080-051-058-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
573 080-051-059-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
574 080-051-060-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
575 080-051-061-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
576 080-051-062-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
577 080-051-063-000 111 008019 A 1 52.00
578 080-051-064-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
579 080-051-065-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
580 080-051-066-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
581 080-051-067-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
582 080-051-068-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
583 080-051-069-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
584 080-051-070-000 121 008019 A 1 52.00
585 080-051-071-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 16 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
586 080-051-072-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
587 080-051-073-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
588 080-051-074-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
589 080-051-075-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
590 080-051-076-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
591 080-051-077-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
1299 080-056-018-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1300 080-056-046-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1301 080-056-047-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
592 080-057-002-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
593 080-057-003-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
594 080-057-004-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
595 080-057-005-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
596 080-057-006-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
597 080-057-007-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
598 080-057-008-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
599 080-057-010-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
600 080-057-011-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
601 080-057-012-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
602 080-057-013-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
603 080-057-014-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
604 080-057-015-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
605 080-057-016-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
606 080-057-017-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
607 080-057-018-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
608 080-057-019-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
609 080-057-020-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
610 080-057-021-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
611 080-057-022-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
612 080-057-023-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
613 080-057-024-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
614 080-057-025-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
615 080-057-026-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
616 080-057-027-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
617 080-057-028-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
618 080-057-029-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
619 080-057-030-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
620 080-057-031-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
621 080-057-032-000 101 008019 A 1 52.00
622 080-057-033-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
623 080-057-034-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 17 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
624 080-057-035-000 111 008032 A 1 52.00
625 080-057-036-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
626 080-057-037-000 111 008032 A 1 52.00
627 080-057-038-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
628 080-057-039-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
629 080-057-040-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
630 080-057-041-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
631 080-057-042-000 111 008032 A 1 52.00
632 080-057-043-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
633 080-057-044-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
634 080-057-045-000 111 008032 A 1 52.00
635 080-057-046-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
636 080-057-047-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
637 080-057-048-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
638 080-057-049-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
639 080-057-050-000 111 008032 A 1 52.00
640 080-057-051-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
641 080-057-052-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
642 080-057-053-000 111 008032 A 1 52.00
643 080-057-054-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
644 080-057-055-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
645 080-057-056-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
646 080-057-057-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
647 080-057-058-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
648 080-057-059-000 111 008032 A 1 52.00
649 080-057-060-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
650 080-057-061-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
651 080-057-062-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
652 080-057-063-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
653 080-057-064-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
654 080-057-065-000 101 008032 A 1 52.00
1303 080-058-003-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1304 080-058-004-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1305 080-058-005-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1306 080-058-006-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1307 080-058-007-000 111 008006 B 1 28.52
1308 080-058-008-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1309 080-058-009-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1310 080-058-010-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1311 080-058-011-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1312 080-058-012-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 18 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1313 080-058-013-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1314 080-058-014-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1315 080-058-015-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1316 080-058-016-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1317 080-058-017-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1318 080-058-018-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1319 080-058-019-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1320 080-058-020-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1321 080-058-021-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1322 080-058-022-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1323 080-058-023-000 111 008006 B 1 28.52
1324 080-058-024-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1325 080-058-025-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1326 080-058-026-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1327 080-058-027-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1328 080-058-028-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1329 080-058-029-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1330 080-058-030-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1331 080-058-031-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1332 080-058-032-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1333 080-058-033-000 111 008006 B 1 28.52
1334 080-058-034-000 111 008006 B 1 28.52
1335 080-058-035-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1336 080-058-036-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1337 080-058-037-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1338 080-058-038-000 111 008006 B 1 28.52
1339 080-058-039-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1340 080-058-040-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1341 080-058-041-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1342 080-058-042-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1343 080-058-043-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1344 080-058-044-000 111 008006 B 1 28.52
1345 080-058-045-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1346 080-058-046-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1347 080-058-047-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1348 080-058-048-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1349 080-058-049-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1350 080-058-050-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1351 080-058-051-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1352 080-058-052-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1353 080-058-053-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 19 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1354 080-058-054-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1355 080-058-055-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1356 080-058-056-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1357 080-058-057-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1358 080-058-058-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1359 080-058-059-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1360 080-058-060-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1361 080-058-061-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1362 080-058-062-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1363 080-058-063-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1364 080-058-064-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1365 080-058-065-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1366 080-058-066-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1367 080-058-067-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1368 080-058-068-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1369 080-058-069-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1370 080-058-070-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1371 080-058-071-000 101 008006 B 1 28.52
1372 080-058-072-000 121 008006 B 1 28.52
655 080-060-001-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
656 080-060-002-000 111 008016 A 1 52.00
657 080-060-003-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
658 080-060-004-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
659 080-060-005-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
660 080-060-006-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
661 080-060-007-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
662 080-060-008-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
663 080-060-009-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
664 080-060-010-000 111 008016 A 1 52.00
665 080-060-011-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
666 080-060-012-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
667 080-060-013-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
668 080-060-014-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
669 080-060-015-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
670 080-060-016-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
1373 080-060-017-000 111 008016 B 1 28.52
1374 080-060-018-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1375 080-060-019-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1376 080-060-020-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
671 080-060-021-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
672 080-060-022-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 20 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
673 080-060-023-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
674 080-060-024-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
675 080-060-025-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
676 080-060-026-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
677 080-060-027-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
678 080-060-028-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
679 080-060-029-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
680 080-060-030-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
681 080-060-031-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
682 080-060-032-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
683 080-060-033-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
684 080-060-034-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
685 080-060-035-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
686 080-060-036-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
687 080-060-037-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
688 080-060-038-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
689 080-060-039-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
690 080-060-040-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
691 080-060-041-000 101 008016 A 1 52.00
692 080-061-001-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
693 080-061-002-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
694 080-061-003-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
695 080-061-004-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
696 080-061-005-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
697 080-061-006-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
698 080-061-007-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
699 080-061-008-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
700 080-061-009-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
701 080-061-010-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
702 080-061-011-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
703 080-061-012-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
704 080-061-013-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
705 080-061-014-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
706 080-061-015-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
707 080-061-016-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
708 080-061-017-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
709 080-061-018-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
710 080-061-019-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
711 080-061-020-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
712 080-061-021-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
713 080-061-022-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 21 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
714 080-061-023-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
715 080-061-024-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
716 080-061-025-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
717 080-061-026-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
718 080-061-027-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
719 080-061-028-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
720 080-061-029-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
721 080-061-030-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
722 080-061-031-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
723 080-061-032-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
724 080-061-033-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
725 080-061-034-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
726 080-061-035-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
727 080-062-001-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
728 080-062-002-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
729 080-062-003-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
730 080-062-004-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
731 080-062-005-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
732 080-062-006-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
733 080-062-007-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
734 080-062-008-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
735 080-062-009-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
736 080-062-010-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
737 080-062-011-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
738 080-062-012-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
739 080-062-013-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
740 080-062-014-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
741 080-062-015-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
742 080-062-016-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
743 080-062-017-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
744 080-062-018-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
745 080-062-019-000 010 008026 A 1 52.00
746 080-062-020-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
747 080-062-021-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
748 080-062-022-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
749 080-062-023-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
750 080-062-024-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
751 080-062-025-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
752 080-062-026-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
753 080-062-027-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
754 080-062-028-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 22 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
755 080-062-029-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
756 080-062-030-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
757 080-062-031-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
758 080-062-032-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
759 080-062-033-000 010 008026 A 1 52.00
760 080-062-034-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
761 080-062-035-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
762 080-062-036-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
763 080-062-037-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
764 080-062-038-000 111 008026 A 1 52.00
765 080-062-039-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
766 080-062-040-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
767 080-062-041-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
768 080-062-042-000 101 008026 A 1 52.00
769 080-063-001-000 410 008021 A 1 52.00
1377 080-063-019-000 210 008021 B 1 28.52
1378 080-064-001-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1379 080-064-002-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1380 080-064-003-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1381 080-064-004-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1382 080-064-005-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1383 080-064-006-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1384 080-064-007-000 101 008001 B 1 28.52
1385 080-064-008-000 121 008001 B 1 28.52
1386 080-064-013-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1387 080-064-014-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1388 080-064-015-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1389 080-064-016-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
1390 080-064-017-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1391 080-064-018-000 101 008003 B 1 28.52
1392 080-064-019-000 121 008003 B 1 28.52
770 080-064-028-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
771 080-064-029-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
772 080-064-030-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
773 080-064-031-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
774 080-064-032-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
775 080-064-033-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
776 080-064-034-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
777 080-064-035-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
778 080-064-036-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
779 080-064-037-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 23 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
780 080-064-038-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
781 080-064-039-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
782 080-064-040-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
783 080-064-041-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
784 080-064-042-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
785 080-064-043-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
786 080-064-044-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
787 080-064-045-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
788 080-064-046-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
789 080-064-047-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
790 080-064-048-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
791 080-064-049-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
792 080-064-050-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
793 080-064-051-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
794 080-064-052-000 101 008001 A 1 52.00
795 080-065-001-000 111 008003 A 1 52.00
796 080-065-002-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
797 080-065-003-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
798 080-065-004-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
799 080-065-005-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
800 080-065-006-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
801 080-066-001-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
802 080-066-002-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
803 080-066-003-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
804 080-066-004-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
805 080-066-005-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
806 080-066-006-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
807 080-066-007-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
808 080-066-008-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
809 080-066-009-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
810 080-066-010-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
811 080-066-011-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
812 080-066-012-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
813 080-066-013-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
814 080-066-014-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
815 080-066-015-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
816 080-066-016-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
817 080-066-017-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
818 080-066-018-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
819 080-066-019-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
820 080-066-020-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 24 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
821 080-066-021-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
822 080-066-022-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
823 080-066-025-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
824 080-066-026-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
825 080-066-027-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
826 080-066-028-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
827 080-066-029-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
828 080-066-030-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
829 080-066-031-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
830 080-066-032-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
831 080-066-033-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
832 080-066-034-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
833 080-066-035-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
834 080-066-036-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
835 080-066-037-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
836 080-066-038-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
837 080-066-039-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
838 080-066-047-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
839 080-066-048-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
840 080-066-052-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
841 080-066-053-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
842 080-066-054-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
843 080-066-055-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
844 080-066-056-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
845 080-066-057-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
846 080-066-058-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
847 080-066-059-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
848 080-066-060-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
849 080-066-061-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
850 080-066-062-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
851 080-066-063-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
852 080-066-064-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
853 080-066-065-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
854 080-066-066-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
855 080-066-067-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
856 080-066-068-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
857 080-066-069-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
858 080-066-070-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
859 080-066-071-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
860 080-066-072-000 111 008005 A 1 52.00
861 080-066-073-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 25 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
862 080-066-074-000 101 008005 A 1 52.00
863 080-067-001-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
864 080-067-002-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
865 080-067-003-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
866 080-067-004-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
867 080-067-005-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
868 080-067-006-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
869 080-067-007-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
870 080-067-008-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
871 080-067-009-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
872 080-067-010-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
873 080-067-011-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
874 080-067-012-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
875 080-067-013-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
876 080-067-014-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
877 080-067-015-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
878 080-067-016-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
879 080-067-017-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
880 080-067-018-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
881 080-067-019-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
882 080-067-020-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
884 080-067-022-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
885 080-067-023-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
886 080-067-024-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
887 080-067-025-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
888 080-067-026-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
889 080-067-027-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
890 080-067-028-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
891 080-067-029-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
892 080-067-030-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
893 080-067-031-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
894 080-067-032-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
895 080-067-033-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
896 080-067-034-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
897 080-067-035-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
898 080-067-036-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
899 080-067-037-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
900 080-067-038-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
901 080-067-039-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
902 080-067-040-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
903 080-067-041-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 26 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
904 080-067-042-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
905 080-067-043-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
906 080-067-044-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
907 080-067-045-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
908 080-067-046-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
909 080-067-047-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
910 080-067-048-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
911 080-067-049-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
912 080-067-050-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
913 080-067-051-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
914 080-067-052-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
915 080-067-053-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
916 080-067-054-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
917 080-067-055-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
918 080-067-056-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
919 080-067-057-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
920 080-067-058-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
921 080-067-059-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
922 080-067-060-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
923 080-067-061-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
924 080-067-062-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
925 080-067-063-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
926 080-067-064-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
927 080-067-065-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
928 080-067-066-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
929 080-067-067-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
930 080-067-068-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
931 080-067-069-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
932 080-067-070-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
933 080-067-071-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
934 080-067-072-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
935 080-067-073-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
936 080-067-074-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
937 080-067-075-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
938 080-067-076-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
939 080-067-077-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
940 080-067-078-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
941 080-067-079-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
942 080-067-080-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
943 080-067-081-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
944 080-067-082-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 27 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
945 080-067-083-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
946 080-067-084-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
947 080-067-085-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
952 080-068-001-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
953 080-068-002-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
954 080-068-003-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
955 080-068-004-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
956 080-068-005-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
957 080-068-006-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
958 080-068-007-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
959 080-068-008-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
960 080-068-009-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
961 080-068-010-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
962 080-068-011-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
963 080-068-012-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
964 080-068-013-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
965 080-068-014-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
967 080-068-016-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
968 080-068-017-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
969 080-068-018-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
970 080-068-019-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
971 080-068-020-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
972 080-068-021-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
973 080-068-022-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
974 080-068-023-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
975 080-068-024-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
976 080-068-025-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
977 080-068-026-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
978 080-068-027-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
979 080-068-028-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
980 080-068-029-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
981 080-068-030-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
982 080-068-031-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
983 080-068-032-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
984 080-068-033-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
985 080-068-034-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
986 080-068-035-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
987 080-068-036-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
988 080-068-037-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
989 080-068-038-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
990 080-068-039-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 28 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
991 080-068-040-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
992 080-068-041-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
993 080-068-042-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
994 080-068-043-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
995 080-068-044-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
999 080-068-048-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1000 080-068-049-000 270 008037 A 1 52.00
1001 080-069-001-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1002 080-069-002-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1003 080-069-003-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1004 080-069-004-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1006 080-069-006-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1007 080-069-007-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1008 080-069-008-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1009 080-069-009-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1010 080-069-010-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1011 080-069-011-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1012 080-069-012-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1013 080-069-013-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1014 080-069-014-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1015 080-069-015-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1016 080-069-016-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1017 080-069-017-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1018 080-069-018-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1019 080-069-019-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1020 080-069-020-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1021 080-069-021-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1022 080-069-022-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1025 080-069-025-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1026 080-069-026-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1027 080-069-027-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1028 080-069-028-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1029 080-069-029-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1030 080-069-030-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1031 080-069-031-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1032 080-069-032-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1033 080-069-033-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1034 080-069-034-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1035 080-069-035-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1036 080-069-036-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1037 080-069-037-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 29 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1038 080-069-038-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1042 080-069-042-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1043 080-069-043-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1044 080-069-044-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1045 080-069-045-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1046 080-069-046-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1047 080-069-047-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1048 080-069-048-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1049 080-069-049-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1050 080-069-050-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1051 080-069-051-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1052 080-069-052-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1053 080-069-053-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1054 080-069-054-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1055 080-069-055-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1056 080-069-056-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1057 080-069-057-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1058 080-069-058-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1059 080-069-059-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1060 080-069-060-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1061 080-069-061-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1062 080-069-062-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1063 080-069-063-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1064 080-069-064-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1065 080-069-065-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1066 080-069-066-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1067 080-069-067-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1068 080-069-068-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1069 080-069-069-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1070 080-069-070-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1071 080-069-071-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1039 080-069-077-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1040 080-069-078-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1041 080-069-079-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1005 080-069-081-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1075 080-070-001-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1076 080-070-002-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1077 080-070-003-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1078 080-070-004-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1079 080-070-005-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1080 080-070-006-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 30 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1081 080-070-007-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1083 080-070-009-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1084 080-070-010-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1085 080-070-011-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1086 080-070-012-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1087 080-070-013-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1088 080-070-014-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1089 080-070-015-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1090 080-070-016-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1091 080-070-017-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1092 080-070-018-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1093 080-070-019-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1094 080-070-020-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1095 080-070-021-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1096 080-070-022-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1097 080-070-023-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1098 080-070-024-000 121 008037 A 1 52.00
1100 080-070-026-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1101 080-070-027-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1102 080-070-028-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1103 080-070-029-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1104 080-070-030-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1105 080-070-031-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1106 080-070-032-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1107 080-070-033-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1108 080-070-034-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1109 080-070-035-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1110 080-070-036-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1111 080-070-037-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1112 080-070-038-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1114 080-070-040-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1115 080-070-041-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1116 080-070-042-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1117 080-070-043-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1118 080-070-044-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1119 080-070-045-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1120 080-070-046-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1121 080-070-047-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1122 080-070-048-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1123 080-070-049-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1124 080-070-050-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 31 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1125 080-070-051-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1126 080-070-052-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1127 080-070-053-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1128 080-070-054-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1129 080-070-055-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1130 080-070-056-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1131 080-070-057-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1132 080-070-058-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1133 080-070-059-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1134 080-070-060-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1135 080-070-061-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1136 080-070-062-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1137 080-070-063-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1138 080-070-064-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1139 080-070-065-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1140 080-070-066-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1141 080-070-067-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1142 080-070-068-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1143 080-070-069-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1144 080-070-070-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1145 080-070-071-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1146 080-070-072-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1147 080-070-073-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1148 080-070-074-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1149 080-070-075-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1150 080-070-076-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1151 080-070-077-000 101 008037 A 1 52.00
1113 080-070-080-000 111 008037 A 1 52.00
1395 080-071-012-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1396 080-071-013-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1397 080-071-014-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1398 080-071-015-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1399 080-071-016-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1400 080-071-017-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1401 080-071-018-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1404 080-071-025-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1405 080-071-026-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1402 080-071-027-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1403 080-071-028-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1154 134-013-029-000 101 008020 A 1 52.00
1155 134-013-030-000 101 008020 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 32 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1156 134-018-025-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1157 134-018-026-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1158 134-018-027-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1159 134-018-028-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1160 134-018-029-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1161 134-018-030-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1162 134-018-031-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1163 134-018-032-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1164 134-018-033-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1165 134-018-034-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1166 134-018-035-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1167 134-018-036-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1168 134-018-037-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1169 134-018-038-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1170 134-018-039-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1171 134-018-040-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1172 134-018-041-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1173 134-018-042-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1174 134-018-043-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1175 134-018-044-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1176 134-018-045-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1177 134-018-046-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1178 134-018-047-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1179 134-018-048-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1180 134-018-049-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1181 134-018-050-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1182 134-018-051-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1183 134-018-052-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1184 134-018-053-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1185 134-018-054-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1186 134-018-055-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1187 134-018-056-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1188 134-018-057-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1189 134-018-058-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1190 134-018-059-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1191 134-018-060-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1192 134-018-061-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1193 134-018-062-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1194 134-018-063-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1195 134-018-064-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1196 134-018-065-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 33 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM City of Waterford
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Assessment
Number
Assessor's Parcel
Number Use Code TRA Zone Benefit Units Levy
1197 134-018-066-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1198 134-018-067-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1199 134-018-068-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1200 134-018-069-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1201 134-018-070-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1202 134-018-071-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1203 134-018-072-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1204 134-018-073-000 111 008003 A 1 52.00
1205 134-018-074-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1206 134-018-075-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1207 134-018-076-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1208 134-018-077-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1209 134-018-078-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1210 134-018-079-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1211 134-018-080-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1212 134-018-081-000 121 008003 A 1 52.00
1213 134-018-082-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1214 134-018-083-000 101 008003 A 1 52.00
1215 134-018-084-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1216 134-018-085-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1217 134-018-086-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1218 134-018-087-000 111 008002 A 1 52.00
1219 134-018-088-000 101 008002 A 1 52.00
1,376 Accounts 1376 $67,583.88
1376 $67,583.88 1,376 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 34 of 34 04/22/2022 02:53:41PM General Business 6d
May 19, 2022
Mike Pitcock, City Manager
City Council Staff Report
Motion: Awarding an Agreement with GHD, Inc of Roseville, Ca. in the amount of $221,264 for the preparation of a Yosemite Blvd Corridor Study.

SUMMARY:

The City Council is being asked to award an agreement with GHD, Inc. of Roseville Ca. for the preparation of a Yosemite Blvd Corridor Study. The plan is 88.53% funded by a state grant with the remainder coming from the Measure L Traffic funding. The plan will provide the city with a road map of improvements and standard modifications necessary to improve Yosemite Blvd through Waterford based on full build out of the City of Waterford General Plan, Stanislaus County General Plan, other growth projections and Caltrans requirements.

ANALYSIS:

On October 7, 2021, the City Council approved the City Manager or Public Works Superintendent to sign all grant agreements and the release of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). On April 22, the City received 1 proposal from GHD, Inc. and the proposal was determined to be the most qualified firm.

The overall project objectives will provide the following:
• Develop a multimodal Corridor Study for pedestrians, cyclists, motorists/truckers that offers safe solutions and supports local businesses and neighborhood residents.
• Develop a Plan that dovetails with City of Waterford General Plan, Caltrans and other State of California plans.
• Obtain in-depth public input from Yosemite Blvd businesses, schools, churches as well as residents of all neighborhoods. • Reduce GHG emissions and meet CA target of reducing 40-80% below 1990 levels.
• Create a Summary Report of prioritized next steps and timeline As the most qualified firm and the proposal meets all requirements outlined in the Request for Qualifications, staff does recommend award of the professional service contract to GHD, Inc. in the amount of $221,264.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Expenses:

Total Project Cost Contract
Amount Contingency
$250,000 $221,264 $28,736
Revenues:

Fund Amount
Grant Funds $221,325
Measure L Traffic 28,675
Total $250,000
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The City finds and determines with certainty hiring an engineering firm is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), as the activity is covered under the general rule that CEQA applies to only projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Not approve the Professional Services Agreement. This is not recommended as GHD Inc. is highly qualified and grant funding is available.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Attachment A – GHD Proposal
• Attachment B – GHD Price Proposal
• Attachment C – Agreement
→ The Power of Commitment
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study a Statement of Qualifications for
Yosemite Avenue (SR 132)
Corridor Study
April 22, 2022
City of Waterford
GHD Inc. | 943 Reserve Drive | Roseville, California 9567 | www.ghd.com April 22, 2022
Michael Pitcock, PE
City Manager
City of Waterford
101 E Street
Waterford, CA 95386
RE: Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study Dear Michael,
The City of Waterford (City) seeks the leadership and expertise of a firm like GHD to develop the Yosemite Boulevard (SR 132) (Yosemite Boulevard) Corridor Study (Study) and subsequent Plan (Plan) with multimodal design concepts to provide continuous systems and safety for all road users. With the expertise, oversight, and familiarity with project stakeholders through her work on the City's Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) project, Kathryn Kleinschmidt will lead the City to reimagining the corridor. Through our work on Yosemite Boulevard, we know the corridor serves a variety of contexts with the high school, adjacent residences, local services and businesses, and recreational traffic. This diversity will be considered in providing multimodal design solutions. In addition, with the different typical sections along Yosemite Boulevard, an overall assessment of the ultimate roadway and facilities will be planned to determine the future right-ofway and recorded Plan Line (Plan). The Plan will provide a cohesive vision for transformation with attention to areas of opportunity and constraint, and will be rooted in extensive stakeholder and community engagement. Highlighted benefits that our team will bring to this project include:
− We know Waterford and Yosemite Boulevard. With the LRSP adopted in May 2021, a thorough collision analysis was conducted and two stakeholder working group meetings were held. This process included Caltrans coordination for Yosemite Boulevard and extending pedestrian walk times and adding a pedestrian leading interval at Reinway Avenue. Through working with the City on the LRSP project, Kathryn and several of our proposed key team members already understand the needs in this community as well as safety and operational issues, and lack of active transportation facilities. The team's early and deep understanding of the project allows us focus on outcomes and a successful outcome for the City.
− Strong Stakeholder and Community Engagement. With Kathryn and our team's previous LRSP stakeholder meeting experience, we bring proven expertise to Waterford with effective and inclusive public engagement. We know Waterford has a large Hispanic/Latino community so it will be important to have both English and Spanish on all documents and the website, and a translator present at all meetings. Our previous collaboration with the City will craft a strategy that works for your residents and business owners and, as a result, will support strong grant applications to fund project implementation.
− Industry Leading Planning and Design. Kathryn is a recognized expert in traffic safety and multimodal planning and design for corridor plans with recent bikeway and pedestrian training from Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Our team has worked together to deliver numerous similar corridor plans in the past two years alone. This expertise paired with our recent work with the City on Yosemite Boulevard will result in a successful project.

Through our work on the City's LRSP project, we understand the safety concerns on the Yosemite Boulevard corridor as well as the necessary collaboration with Caltrans District 10 for this important State Highway. We understand the importance of Yosemite Boulevard as a main corridor in the City and overall regional route within Stanislaus County. Our commitment is to provide a Study and subsequent Plan that you, your staff, your residents, and your stakeholders will not only be proud of, but will have grant ready components and phases for easy implementation.

Regards,
Kathryn Kleinschmidt, PE, PTOE Kamesh Vedula, PE, TE
Project Manager Principal-in-Charge
805.858.3147 916.918.0622
[email protected] [email protected]
→ The Power of Commitment 1257643
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 2 → 1. General
Information
About GHD
GHD provides transportation planning and
engineering, environmental, advisory, digital, and
construction services to private and public sector
clients. Operating globally and delivering services
locally, we offer our clients the ability to develop a
working relationship with our local staff while having
access to our global experience base.

Established in 1928, GHD is a wholly-owned subsidiary
- a privately held international engineering firm owned by our people and operating across five continents.

With 10,000+ professionals globally, including over
370 in California, we are one of the world’s leading
professional services companies operating in the
global markets of transportation, water, energy and
resources, environment, and property and buildings.

With our decades of knowledge, we offer a deep
understanding of the challenges facing public
agencies and communities today.

Transportation Services
Transportation is inherently about the mobility of
people, goods, and services, and the most effective
ways to achieve this. Our team helps create safe,
active, connected communities where bicycling
and walking are part of a healthy lifestyle and
sustainable transportation system. We have
considerable experience assisting local agencies
with planning and creating complete streets,
and providing safe, connected, and accessible
networks. Our knowledge and understanding of
modes of transportation, land use challenges,
technology, systems, human behavior, safety, and
emerging trends is vital to successful transportation
planning and traffic engineering. With our network of
transportation and traffic specialists we can apply
our skills and experience to find a solution to any
challenge.

GHD has an excellent performance record with
municipal and government agencies throughout
California. We have been working with municipal
clients throughout the state for the past 70 years and
have successfully completed dozens of projects that
include the following transportation services:
– Corridor Studies
– Road Safety Planning
– Complete Streets Planning and Design
– Active Transportation Planning and Design
– Streetscape Design and Placemaking
– Community Engagement
– Traffic Engineering
– Civil Engineering
– Landscape Architecture/Wayfinding
– Roundabout Planning/Design
– Construction Management
– Land/Construction Surveying
– Interagency Coordination
Project Life Cycle
GHD works to develop solutions that meet the
needs of our clients today, tomorrow, and into the
future. We begin each project with the full life cycle
in mind, from planning through operation, keeping
in mind future needs. We develop plans that include
low-cost, "quick win" solutions alongside longterm visionary projects that may require outside funding, and prioritize projects based on local values, connections to key destinations, and opportunities
for network completion. Our experience spans
the entire project development process, from
planning documents such as bicycle masterplans,
through Plans, Specifications, and Estimates and
the construction phase of a variety of multimodal
facilities including trails, bikeways, and complete
streets.

GHD California
370+
GHD Americas
5,000+
GHD Global
10,000+
Firm and Contact Information
Firm Name: GHD Inc. (GHD)
Proposal contact: Kathryn Kleinschmidt, PE, PTOE,
Project Manager, 1101 Monterey Street, Suite 120,
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, 805.858.3147
[email protected]
Person authorized to negotiate contract terms and
make binding agreements: Kamesh Vedula, PE, TE,
Principal-in-Charge, 943 Reserve Drive, Roseville, CA
93401, 916.918.0622, [email protected]
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 3 Professional Qualifications
Our project team helps create active, connected
communities throughout California where bicycling
and walking are part of a healthy lifestyle and
sustainable transportation system that supports local
businesses and community members, as well as
supporting local and regional environmental goals.

Kathryn Kleinschmidt, PE, PTOE, will be your project
manager and main point of contact. She brings over
18 years of experience in traffic and transportation
engineering, and is recognized as a national leader
in transportation and traffic planning. Kathryn was
the project manager for the City's successful
LRSP project, which was finalized and adopted
unanimously at City Council in May 2021.

Kathryn brings direct experience developing
multimodal networks and implementation for state
highways throughout local California communities.

She is an expert in traffic safety and multimodal
planning and design for corridor plans with recent
bikeway and pedestrian training from Caltrans and
FHWA. Kathryn successfully completed the Santa
Maria Multimodal Study that included analyzing
multimodal design concepts on the two state
highways through the Santa Maria’s downtown (SR
116 Main Street and SR 135 Broadway). After the
study was complete in February 2020, she attended
collaboration meetings with Caltrans to implement
some of the recommended improvements with a
Capital Preventive Maintenance and Safety Project
on Broadway (SR 135). As a result, reduced lane
width allowed bike lanes and buffered bike lanes to
be included. In addition, operational improvements
including left and right turn lanes were incorporated
based on analysis. Santa Maria also pushed for
green conflict paint for bicycle and vehicle mixing
zones and crosswalk treatments that were also
incorporated.

Under Kathryn's leadership, we have assembled a
team with an emphasis on demonstrated technical
ability and a proven track record. The GHD team
has worked together assisting public agencies to
analyze existing highway interchanges and associated
roadways and in proposing improvements to
enhance mobility within the transportation networks
for a number of California locations. Through this
experience, we have learned valuable skills to
efficiently complete complex high profile projects
and look forward to utilizing that experience for you.

As illustrated in the Organizational Chart on
the next page and in our key team resumes and
supporting team bios beginning on page 5, GHD
offers a comprehensive and experienced team and
has access to a large network of additional resources
to deliver a quality project, on schedule and within
budget. This team of individuals will be dedicated
throughout the life of the project and will ensure
continuity and efficiency in project delivery, which
will be critical to meeting the schedule.

Praise for Kathy Kleinschmidt for her role as project manager on the City of Waterford's Local Road Safety Plan.
"Your presentation to the City of Waterford council
members on the Local Road Safety Plan was outstanding.

You presented the plan as it was being put together with details and infographics. You organized, planned, created, and presented a plan that tells a story that the community and leaders can understand as to how it will be implemented." Thank you,
Jose M. Aldaco, Mayor
GHD's project manager is well-known to the City for her success on their LRSP project last year.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 4 GHD's Project Team
We propose a streamlined team that has worked
together before on similar projects, including the
City's LRSP last year. Our team structure spans the
anticipated needed services, and the Organizational
Chart below details our proposed team, including
disciplinary-based roles tailored to your project. GHD
has the capacity to add additional staff if needed or
desired, and can accommodate any scope changes if
necessary.

Our project team is responsive and efficient, yet
dynamic, including technical expertise in civil
engineering, traffic and transportation engineering,
environmental/GHG expertise, traffic safety,
complete streets and active transportation, survey,
and public engagement, that includes Spanish
translation services. Our team’s combination of
experts provides the City with an incomparable
advantage for delivering a successful project for the
City, community, and local businesses.

In addition to technical ability, our team members
were also selected based on availability. Each team
member has sufficient availability to commit the
appropriate amount of time to your project.

Resumes and qualifications for our project team
begin on the next page.

Organizational Chart
Kamesh Vedula, PE, TE

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
& QA/QC

KEY TEAM RESOURCES
Kathryn Kleinschmidt, PE, PTOE

PROJECT MANAGER
& ADVISORY COMMITTEE LEAD

COMPLETE STREETS &

PUBLIC ENAGEMENT LEAD
Kendra Ramsey, AICP

ENVIRONMENTAL/

GREENHOUSE GAS LEAD
Chryss Meier

PERFORMANCE

METRICS LEAD
Todd Tregenza, AICP

DESIGN CONCEPTS LEAD
Daniel Kehrer, PE, QSD/QSP

SAFETY &

COUNTERMEASURE LEAD
Faridur Rahman, EIT

SURVEY LEAD
Brian Howard, PLS

SUPPORTING TEAM MEMBERS

ENGINEERING LEAD
Carlos Rodriguez Mejia, EIT

BIKE/PEDESTRIAN LEAD
Ethan Angold

ADVISORY COMMITTEE & BIKE/

PEDESTRIAN DESIGN SUPPORT
Jenny Godwin, AICP Candidate

ADVISORY COMMITTEE &

SAFETY SUPPORT
Emily Darke, EIT

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT &

SAFETY SUPPORT
Kiera Bryant, EIT

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

SUPPORT
Jorge Vanegas-Moran, EIT

PERFORMANCE METRICS

SUPPORT
Rosanna Southern, EIT

SURVEY SUPPORT
Jeff Cooke

GIS DEVELOPMENT
Paige Thornton
Key Project Team Member

VALUE TO THE CITY
; 370+ local and 10,000+ global
professionals will ensure that your project
is completed on time and on budget.
; A full-service in-house team that brings
expertise to your project from working together
on similar projects throughout California.
; GHD and the City of Waterford have established
a working relationship while completing City's
LRSP project and are familar with the challenges
and opportunities within Yosemite Boulevard.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 5 City of Waterford LRSP. Project Manager| City
of Waterford | Waterford, CA | Led the collision
analysis for the past five years in identifying fatal and injury collisions and collision trends within the City
and on the main corridor through the City (SR 132).

Formed the LRSP stakeholder group and held two
stakeholder meetings in August and October. After
stakeholder review the draft LRSP was provided on
the public website for their comments. After a month,
public comment period, the draft LRSP was finalized
and adopted unanimously in May 2021.

SR 49 Corridor System Management Plan.

Traffic Engineer | Nevada County Transportation
Commission | Nevada County, CA | Performed travel
time reliability including congestion and reliability
analysis, buffer time index, and societal cost of
unreliability. In addition, performance metrics were
quantified for delay including total vehicle hours of
delay and total person minutes of delay. This was all
documented in the Performance Measures section
of the Corridor System Management Plan Report.

Santa Maria Downtown Traffic Study. Traffic
Project Manager | City of Santa Maria | Santa Maria,
CA | Managed and performed the traffic analysis,
safety, and multimodal analysis on Main Street (SR
166) and Broadway (SR 135) in support of the City’s
Downtown Multimodal Streetscape Concept Plan
(DMSCP). This additional analysis was necessary to
address Caltrans' comments that additional traffic
and design analysis be conducted to evaluate 11-
foot travel lanes, consolidation of dual left turns
to single left turns at Main and Broadway, removal
of travel lanes or right turn lanes, and the truck
turning movements with the curb extensions. In
addition, this traffic study determined the feasibility of the proposed concepts in the DMSCP and
overall recommended projects in moving to the
design phase. In addition, based on stakeholder
coordination meetings with the CIty and Caltrans,
bikeways (to include bike lanes and buffered bike
lanes) and enhanced crosswalks will be added with a
Capital Preventive Maintenance (CAPM) project.

Select Project Experience
Kathryn Kleinschmidt PE, PTOE
Project Manager and Advisory Committee Lead
Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Civil Engineer, CA #93262, AZ #52181, TX #11192; Professional Traffic Operations Engineer #3871 | Experience: 18 years Relevance to the Project:

Kathryn will be your project manager, Advisory Committee lead, and main point of contact. She will manage the development of project content and deliverables, coordinate and perform technical reviews, and direct the work of subject matter experts to achieve an efficient and effective project delivery for the City of Waterford. Kathryn brings over 18 years of experience in traffic and transportation engineering, with a successful history managing projects for small communities throughout California. She recently managed the development of the Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) for the City of Waterford, building successful partnerships with key stakeholders and City staff. Kathryn has performed feasibility and corridor studies, Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) studies (I & II), intersection analysis and microsimulation, multimodal studies, traffic signal warrant analysis, traffic impact analysis, traffic forecasting, signal timing, multiway stop and signal warrant analysis, speed surveys, and safety studies to include Local Road Safety Plans and Highway Safety Manual crash analysis including safety (Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program). She also has experience in managing design projects with various funding, contract documents and management, public outreach and meetings, and coordinating with various stakeholders (local, state, and Federal Highway Administration) and adhering to CEQA and NEPA standards. Kathryn is committed to the Yosemite Boulevard (SR 132) Corridor Study and will use her collaborative leadership to effectively manage delivery of this critical project.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 6 Qualifications: MS, Transportation; BS, Civil Engineering; Civil Engineer, CA #79926; Traffic Engineer, CA #2546 | Experience: 21 years
Relevance to the Project:

Kamesh has over 21 years in the disciplines of transportation engineering, planning, and modeling. He oversees the workload balance of the transportation planning/engineering group and coordinates with other groups and regions to level staff resources. Kamesh is an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) specialist, completing numerous ICE projects within a majority of Caltrans Districts and conducting ICE analyses training classes in Caltrans District 11 and Headquarters. His project management experience includes Caltrans PSR-PDS, PA/ ED, ICE studies, roundabout planning/design, advanced roundabout operations analyses/design, complete streets studies, corridor studies, traffic impact studies, and traffic safety studies. Kamesh will be your principal-in-charge and will be actively engaged to ensure your expectations are met and project requirements are fulfilled. He will also provide QA/QC and schedule adherence, technical review, and overall quality control in collaboration with the project manager and performance metrics lead.

Valley Springs Town Center Connectivity Plan,
Complete Streets. Principal-in-Charge, Advisor
| Calaveras Council of Governments | Calaveras
County, CA | Oversaw the traffic forecasting
and operations, assisted with identification of
improvements for consistency against the project
need and purpose, and reviewed cost estimates.

The plan identified near- and long-term complete
streets projects for implementation along SR 49
and Mountain Ranch Road. Improvements included
bicycle and pedestrian facilities to close network
gaps and provide safe crossings, intersection
signalizations, and potential roundabout locations as
well as a new multimodal network to connect growth
areas to existing neighborhoods and amenities.

North State Street Complete Streets Corridor
Study. Principal-in-Charge, Advisor | Mendocino
County | Ukiah, CA | Provided guidance on the
traffic operational/capacity improvements for
alternative improvements that included traffic
signal modifications, raised medians, roundabouts,
and a combination of these measures. The study
focused on identifying cost effective solutions to
improve pedestrian/bike safety, calm traffic speeds,
accommodate commercial traffic, and beautify the
corridor.

Eastside Transportation Corridor Improvement
Study. Principal-in-Charge | Fresno County |
Fresno County, CA | Oversaw a diverse, five-firm
project team to develop a comprehensive report
on existing transportation conditions, future
needs, and network recommendations to improve
multimodal transportation in rural, eastern Fresno
County. Provided QA/QC on traffic modeling and
recommendations development.

Old Redwood Highway Complete Street
Improvement and Design. Traffic Engineer | City
of Cotati | Cotati, CA | Responsible for traffic study
to address the transportation impacts associated
with the proposed Village Main Street roadway
improvement project that proposes to improve Old
Redwood Highway Corridor to a pedestrian-oriented
two-lane facility for use in completing the project’s
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
environmental documents.

Rocklin Road Complete Street Corridor
Improvement Master Plan and PS&E. Project
Engineer | C&C Construction, Incorporated, City of
Rocklin | Rocklin, CA | Preparation of Roundabout
Feasibility Report. Synchro, SIDRA, Rodel, and
VISSIM software were utilized to quantify the
performance criteria for study alternatives for this
project entailing a complete street corridor through
six intersections.

Select Project Experience
Kamesh Vedula PE, TE
Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 7 Qualifications: MS, Community Development; AICP Certified Planner #32395; Safe Routes to School National Course Instructor | Experience: 14 years Relevance to the Project:

Kendra has over 14 years of experience leading projects to create safe transportation networks in California communities, specializing in delivering complete streets plans and programs in disadvantaged communities, as well as safe routes to school plans and programs. With a background in community engagement, Kendra designs and implements effective public outreach efforts that reach diverse stakeholders often left out of traditional engagement programs and builds successful partnerships with community organizations to leverage the reach of valued local leaders. In addition to the relevant projects outlined below, Kendra recently delivered the Old Redwood Highway Corridor Enhancement Plan in Windsor and Eastside Transportation Corridor Improvement Study for the Fresno Council of Governments, overseeing all planning and community engagement to develop complete streets improvements along two important corridors serving both Main Street and goods movements functions. Kendra also provides valuable grant-writing services to communities fighting climate change. She is the project manager for READY Nevada County Extreme Climate Event Mobility & Adaptation Plan to identify climate-related impacts to the transportation network and provide a county-wide vision for improvements to infrastructure, preparation, and long-term planning. She recently led Calaveras Council of Government's successful grant application for an extreme climate event preparedness plan.

Old Redwood Highway Corridor Enhancement
Plan. Assistant Project Manager | Town of Windsor |
Windsor, CA | Managed the data collection, analysis,
recommendation development, and outreach for
development of a comprehensive vision to make Old
Redwood Highway into a complete street through the
Town, improving crossings and bicycle connectivity,
and creating a sense of place along the corridor.

Imola Avenue Corridor Complete Streets Study.

Active Transportation Advisor | Napa Valley
Transportation Authority | Napa, CA | Provided draft
concept improvement review and consulted on
strategies to maximize active transportation benefits
on a corridor study to increase multimodal comfort
and accessibility, improve traffic operations, and
create a vibrant and inviting streetscape.

Valley Springs Town Center Connectivity Plan.

Active Transportation Advisor | Calaveras Council
of Governments | Valley Springs, CA | Advisor on
active transportation and SRTS planning for the
development of a community-driven multimodal
complete streets plan Valley Springs' “Town Center”
area.

Eastside Transportation Corridor Improvement
Study. Project Manager | Fresno Council of
Governments | Fresno, CA | Managed the
development of a comprehensive improvement
study for the major north-south and east-west
corridors in Eastern Fresno County. The plan
included proven safety countermeasures to address
collision hot spots, as well as bicycle and pedestrianfocused connectivity and safety improvements.

Conceptual designs were developed for priority
projects.

City of Santa Maria Active Transportation Plan.

Project Manager | City of Santa Maria | Santa
Maria, CA | Managed the development of the
active transportation plan to improve bicycling and
walking in Santa Maria, a disadvantaged community.

Developed and implemented effective virtual
engagement strategy during COVID-19 pandemic.

Managed development of a Cycle 5 Active
Transportation Program grant application for priority
projects.

Select Project Experience
Kendra Ramsey AICP
Complete Streets and Public Engagement Lead
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 8 Bell Road at I-80 Interchange. Environmental
Planner | Placer County | Placer County, CA |
Prepared multiple air quality and GHG reports in
support of the project’s environmental clearance,
including the Caltrans Climate Change Memorandum
for Non-Capacity Increasing projects, the Caltrans
Air Quality Report, a construction-period emissions
memorandum, and the Conformity Exemption
Form for Interagency Consultation with supporting
information. The project would replace the two
existing intersections with two modern, yieldcontrolled, single- and multi-lane roundabouts designed to accommodate future growth “Year 2045”
traffic forecast volumes. Specifically, the County
would construct a six-legged roundabout at Bell Road
that includes the Bowman Road intersection and
the I-80 westbound ramps intersection, as well as a
five-legged roundabout at Bell Road that includes the
I-80 eastbound ramps intersection and the Musso
Road intersection. The project is intended to improve
overall operations, circulation, and accessibility for
drivers and cyclists at the existing Bell Road at I-80
Interchange.

Jackson Sutter Street Extension. Environmental
Planner City of Jackson | Jackson, CA | Assisted in
preparing an environmental constraints analysis for
the proposed project. Reviewed prior project studies
and report, conducted a site visit, and assisted in
the preparation of a project recommendations
memorandum. The project would realign and extend
Sutter Street from SR 49/88 to Hoffman Street in
the City of Jackson. The purpose of the project is to
relieve traffic congestion along Hoffman Street and
divert traffic to the safer signalized intersection of
Sutter Street and Highway 49/88.

Fulton Road Widening and Improvement.

Environmental Planner | City of Santa Rosa | Santa
Rosa, CA | Completed the air quality and GHG
sections of the project’s IS/MND. The project
included roadway widening, new vehicle travel lanes,
bicycle lanes, sidewalks, bioretention areas, bus
stops, landscaping, utility relocations, storm water
facilities, and property acquisitions and easements.

The MND was unanimously adopted by the Santa
Rosa City Council.

Project Experience
Chryss Meier
Environmental/Greenhouse Gas Lead
Qualifications: BA, Geography | Experience: 15 years
Relevance to the Project:

Chryss has 15 years of experience as an environmental planner, with a specialty in air quality and greenhouse analysis, responsible for the preparation of documents for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). She has prepared environmental documentation and technical analysis for a variety of projects, including transportation and transit improvements, general and specific plans, schools, multi-use development, planned communities, redevelopment, industrial and warehouse, airport infrastructure, Sphere of Influence and incorporation proposals, and other infrastructure. She has successfully managed the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), Initial Studies and Mitigated Negative Declarations (IS/MND’s), Categorical Exemptions, and State Revolving Fund CEQA-Plus packages. In addition, she has been involved in the management and preparation of combined EIR/environmental assessments, transportation conformity analyses, and air quality and GHG technical reports. She has also provided training courses on implementation of CEQA, modeling and analysis procedures, and organized and led meetings with public agencies, interest groups, and consultants.

Chryss’ technical expertise is air quality, and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions within the context of CEQA and NEPA. She has prepared air quality and GHG analyses using computer models, such as the CalEEMod, EMFAC, and CALINE air quality models.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 9 Qualifications: BS, Community and Regional Development; AICP Certified Planner #29678 | Experience: 15 years
Relevance to the Project:

Todd will provide performance metrics leadership throughout your project, ensuring the GHD team hits your strategic objectives. With 15 years of transportation planning experience, Todd has assisted dozens of agencies throughout California in short- and long- range plans. These include a specific focus on applying a performance-based transportation planning approach to generate stakeholder support and secure project funding on challenging corridors, including Caltrans rights-of-way in Districts 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, and 10. He recently manged the delivery of the SR 36 Chester Complete Streets and Context Sensitive Streetscape Plan in Caltrans District 2. Todd also managed delivery of the US 101 Eureka Broadway Multimodal Corridor Plan and Imola Avenue Corridor Complete Streets Improvement Plan, each of which received implementation funding through the Caltrans SHOPP Complete Streets reservation fund.

US 101 Broadway Multimodal Corridor Plan.

Project Manager | Humboldt County Association of
Governments | Eureka, CA | Managed preparation
of a multimodal corridor plan for US 101 in the City
of Eureka, following Caltrans Corridor Planning
Guidelines. The corridor suffers a lack of multimodal
accessibility, poor travel reliability, and high rates of severe and fatal pedestrian and bicycle collisions.

In turn, the plan proposed the major reconfiguration
of the roadway, including provision for robust Class
IV bikeways, transit prioritization through dedicated
lanes and queue jump pockets, shortened pedestrian
crossings, and new couplets to redistribute traffic.

Todd closely coordinated with City and Caltrans
partners to inform competitive grant applications,
including Solutions for Congested Corridors
Program.

Imola Avenue Corridor Complete Streets
Improvement Plan. Project Manager | Napa Valley
Transportation Authority | Napa, CA | Managed the
development of a 3.5-mile multimodal complete
streets plan to address safety improvements for all
road users and improved pedestrian and bicyclist
mobility. Todd coordinated plan development with
agency and community stakeholders to ensure a
community-driven process, then prioritized and
programmed improvements according to various
measures of effectiveness, such as cost-benefit,
constructibility, and environmental stewardship.

Valley Springs Town Center Connectivity
Plan. Project Manager | Calaveras Council of
Governments (CCG) | Valley Springs, CA | Managed
the development of a community-driven multimodal
complete streets plan with a focus on multimodal and
school safety. Coordinated plan development with
community stakeholders to ensure community buyin on recommendations and ensured support from all public agency partners, including Caltrans, Calaveras
County, and CCG. Assessed existing conditions for
bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and auto users, including intersection operations, multimodal traffic stress and
safety, and accessibility and connectivity. Developed
implementable, cost-effective grant-eligible,
prioritized infrastructure recommendations for the
plan.

San Andreas SR 49 Southern Gateway Commercial
Corridor Study. Project Manager | Calaveras
Council of Governments | San Andreas, CA |
Assisted with the corridor study including bicycle
and pedestrian facilities to close network gaps and
provide safe crossings, intersection signalizations
and potential roundabout locations, and a new
multimodal network to connect growth areas to
existing neighborhoods and amenities. Stakeholder
outreach included property ownership groups at the
southern gateway area where market-based future
land use alternatives were developed using allowable
use and realist absorption rates.

Select Project Experience
Todd Tregenza AICP
Performance Metrics Lead
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 10 Old Redwood Highway Complete Street
Improvement and Design. Design Engineer | City
of Cotati | Cotati, CA | Lead project design engineer
for plans, specifications, and estimate to address
the transportation impacts for use in completing
the project’s California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) environmental documents. The goal was to
improve the corridor to a pedestrian-oriented twolane facility with the proposed Village Main Street Roadway Improvement project.

East Joiner Parkway/Twelve Bridges Drive
Pavement Rehabilitation. Lead Project Design
Engineer | City of Lincoln | Lincoln, CA | Lead project design engineer for the project plans, specifications,
and estimate for the rehabilitation of two major
corridors: East Joiner Parkway and Twelve Bridges
Drive. The project included roadway rehabilitation,
sidewalk extensions, and various ADA upgrades.

Mariposa Elementary School State and Federal
Safe Routes to School. Design Engineer | Mariposa
County Department of Public Works | Mariposa,
CA | Design engineer for project plans and estimates
for two federal and the state safe route to school
projects in the Town of Mariposa. The project
included the addition of sidewalks, ADA ramps,
ditches, road widening, utility relocations, and
property frontage improvements.

La Quinta Village Complete Street, a Road Diet
Project. Design Engineer | City of La Quinta | La
Quinta, CA | Lead project design engineer for the
Active Transportation Plan (ATP) grant application
and project plans, specifications, and estimate. The
grant application of three complete street corridors
includes five roundabouts, a road diet, and various
pedestrian crossing improvements. The preliminary
analysis and design assisted the City to acquire ATP
grant funding.

Select Project Experience
Daniel Kehrer PE, QSD/QSP
Design Concepts Lead
Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Civil Engineer, CA #2663; Qualified SWPPP Developer/Practitioner, CA #25976 | Experience: 18 years Relevance to the Project:

Daniel is a project manager who has overseen and led the design for numerous civil engineering planning documents and designs for various complex roadway corridors, intersections, interchanges, bike trails, rail crossings, road diets, peer reviews, and site development projects for over 15 years. He works collaboratively with our staff in providing civil engineering design and planning support, including feasibility studies, plan line studies, environmental documents, traffic reports, project reports, safety analyses, peer reviews, plan preparation, specifications, estimates, and construction support. He is well-versed in assembling plans/ exhibits/documents, quantity calculations, and cost estimations, as well as roadway software design programs, right-of-way certification, utility coordination, and construction plan reviews. He is very familiar with design codes, such as the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM), Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)/Public Rightsof-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Roadside Design Guide, California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), and National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672 (Roundabouts: an Informational Guide) which is the national standard for roundabout designs and performance checks.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 11 State Route (SR) 29 Comprehensive Multimodal
Corridor Plan. Transportation Engineer | Napa
Valley Transportation Authority | Napa County,
CA | Conducted a traffic analysis of the corridor
comprised of SR 221, SR 121, SR 12, and other major
arterials in Napa County to calculate travel time
reliability. Used cloud-based probe generated data
from INRIX Analytics and National Performance
Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) for both
cars and heavy vehicles to generate speed and
percentile travel times through the corridor. Traffic
conditions for AM and PM peaks, as well as weekday
and weekend, were analyzed to observe temporal
travel pattern. Results of the analysis included travel time reliability matrices and speed-based congestion
measures for each roadway in the corridor at
different times.

Barney Road and Industry Road Industrial
Development Traffic Impact Analysis
Memorandum. Transportation Engineer | CA OffSite Commercial, Inc. | Anderson, CA | Performed trip generation, distribution, and assignment for the
TIA memorandum for an industrial development.

Performed safety analysis for project intersections
and roadways. A Synchro and Sidra network was
created and the existing, existing plus project,
cumulative no project, and cumulative plus project
scenarios were modeled. This also involved using
the Shasta Sims Travel Demand Model in forecasting
cumulative 2040 conditions.

City of Shasta Lake LRSP. Transportation Engineer
| City of Shasta Lake | Shasta Lake, CA | Performed
analysis of crash data for City and State roadways in
the City of Shasta Lake. Coordinated data between
SWITRS, TASAS, and the City’s internal database
to create a comprehensive collision database.

Visualized collisions by density, severity, pedestrian
and bicycle collisions using ArcGIS. Identified
locations of high severity and frequency of collisions.

Identified mitigation measure to address hotspot
locations and systemic locations. Coordinated with
the local roadway safety committee to develop
solutions for roadway safety issues.

Santa Maria Downtown Traffic Study | City of
Santa Maria. Transportation Engineering | Santa
Maria, CA | Performed traffic, safety, and multimodal
analysis on Main Street (SR 166) and Broadway (SR
135) in support of the City’s Downtown Multimodal
Streetscape Concept Plan. Created light and heavy
vehicle volume sets for the analysis. This additional
analysis was necessary to address Caltrans'
comments that additional traffic and design analysis
be conducted to evaluate 11-foot-wide travel lanes,
consolidation of dual left turns to single left turns at Main and Broadway, removal of travel lanes or right
turn lanes, and the truck turning movements with
the curb extensions. In addition, this traffic study
evaluated the feasibility of the proposed concepts
and overall recommended projects in moving to the
design phase.

Select Project Experience
Faridur Rahman EIT
Safety and Countermeasure Lead
Qualifications: MS/BS; Civil Engineering; Engineer-in-Training, CA #166083 | Experience: 5 years
Relevance to the Project:

Faridur is a transportation engineer focusing on transportation planning and traffic operations throughout California. With five years of experience, he performs travel time reliability analysis, traffic analysis, and systematic safety analysis by processing big data and utilizing traffic evaluation software. Faridur is experienced in using cloud-based probe generated vehicle data to perform reliability analyses. He utilizes traffic simulation and modeling software to analyze intersections and roadways in accordance with Highway Capacity Manual methodologies.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 12 Rhonda Road Extension. Survey Manager | City of
Anderson | Anderson, CA | Provided topographic
mapping and boundary survey for a new road
extension to better serve commercial growth
properties. The new roadway will provide additional
access to a large shopping center and add retail
development to a 1,500-foot-long corridor.

City of Citrus Heights Electric Greenway Design
and Environmental Services. Survey Manager | City
of Citrus Heights | Citrus Heights, CA | Performed
all surveys and base mapping required for the
engineering, detailed design, conform requirements
to existing topography, and infrastructure design of
the three-mile trail project. Surveying and mapping
included establishing a datum; setting vertical and
horizontal control; drone based aerial photography
and LiDAR mapping; detailed topographic and
boundary surveys, and right-of-way determination.

The mapping product was a digital base map with
surface, digital rectified orthophotograph, and
boundary lines. Project control and mapping met the
Caltrans Orders of Survey Accuracy at a mapping
scale of 1”=20’ and a one-foot contour interval. Aerial photography and mapping were accomplished with
the use of a drone. Information gathered was used
to map the route of the proposed trail and provide a
scaled photograph as an overlay. Recorded map and
deed data was compiled, and sufficient monuments
were located to create a land net base map.

Sacramento Drive Bridge Replacement at Olney
Creek. Survey Manager | City of Redding | Redding,
CA | Performed the topographic/boundary surveys,
data collection, hydraulic cross-sections, and utility
coordination. This project is a replacement bridge on
a city collector street.

Lowden Park Trail Right of Way and Surveying.

Survey Manager | Trinity County | Trinity County,
CA | Provided the right-of way engineering services
and boundary surveys for the stand-alone bicycle
and pedestrian trail in and adjacent to the park.

The right-of way engineering includes boundary
surveying, preparation of legal descriptions and plats, monumentation, and filing a record of survey.

Montana Avenue Safe Route to School (SRTS).

Survey Manager | City of Shasta Lake | Shasta Lake,
CA | Provided topographic surveying, right-of way
engineering, and construction staking. The project
provided connectivity from residences to multiple
schools and baseball field/park by adding curbs,
sidewalks, and drainage features. Awarded APWA
“Project of the Year”.

Select Project Experience
Brian Howard PLS
Survey Lead
Qualifications: BS, Survey and Photogrammetry; AS, Engineering; Professional Land Surveyor, CA #7250 | Experience: 35 years Relevance to the Project:

Brian manages GHD’s Northern California surveying projects, supervises surveyors, and schedules field and office personnel. Throughout his 35-year career, he has performed surveying and right-of-way engineering on a full range of projects as project manager and party chief. Brian has extensive experience with topographic, boundary, and construction surveying, as well as expertise with geodetic and photogrammetric control, hydrographic surveying, optical tooling, and monitoring surveys. He has surveyed in all types of environments from the highly industrial settings of chemical plants, steel mills, and oil refineries to remote areas staking slide repairs and establishing boundary lines, including work in the vast majority of California’s counties.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 13 Supporting Team Members
Emily Darke, EIT | Advisory Committee and Safety Support Emily has provided project engineering support on Local Road Safety Plans and Traffic Impact Analyses, including the City of Waterford's LRSP and traffic projects for the cities of San Luis Obispo, Redding, Turlock, and Santa Maria. She also has experience in the public sector where she assisted in performing traffic warrants and drawing collision diagrams as well as gathering speed, volume, and turning movement data.

Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Engineer in Training (EIT), CA #168937 | Experience: 3 years Jenny Godwin, AICP Candidate | Advisory Committee and Bike/Pedestrian Design Support Jenny holds expertise in developing complete streets plans for local governments; conducting transportation infrastructure needs assessments; SRTS, quick-build and Vision Zero projects planning; and development of successful grant applications for local agencies. Jenny was recently a planner for the Old Redwood Highway Corridor Enhancement Plan for the Town of Windsor that offered recommendations for creating a complete street through the Town, including improved crossings and bicycle connectivity.

Qualifications: MS, Urban & Regional Planning; BA, Urban Planning & Environmental Policy; AICP Candidate, 2021 (passed exam, awaiting full AICP credential following acceptance of essay) | Experience: 3 years Ethan Angold | Bike/Pedestrian Design Support
Ethan performs traffic analyses, systemic safety analyses, shortest path analyses, benefit-cost analyses, quantity estimates for circulation element updates, corridor studies, and traffic impact studies. He also performs traffic model calibration, trip generation modeling, data visualization, and report preparation. Ethan recently supported the West Texas, California Complete Streets project where he prepared competitive Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) application packages for active transportation-oriented corridor safety improvements, ran corridor-wide collision analysis to identify highly cost-effective countermeasures, and developed a tool to calculate collision reduction benefit of multiple HSIP countermeasures based on the latest version of the California Local Roadway Safety Manual.

Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering | Experience: 3 years Carlos Rodriguez Mejia, EIT | Engineering Lead
Carlos works on a variety of roadway projects such as highway widenings, express lanes, interchanges, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. He collaborates alongside project engineers and project managers to create cost estimates; environmental documents; and plans, specifications, and estimate plans that comply with local, federal, and state guidelines. He is experienced with Caltrans’ Standards & Specifications and the Federal Highway Design Manual that ensures project designs meet current standards.

Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Engineer-in-Training, CA #161154 | Experience: 10 years Kiera Bryant, EIT | Public Engagement and Safety Support Kiera has three years of experience in traffic analysis and safety as well as transportation design. She has worked on projects that include Intersection Control Evaluation studies (I and II), Systemic Safety Analysis Reports, Local Road Safety Plans, Traffic Impact Analysis Reports, traffic signal warrants, traffic signal timing, and signage and striping plans. For the cities of Waterford, Carpinteria, and Healdsburg's recent LRSP projects, Kiera created and maintained Social Pinpoint websites in support of public outreach efforts.

Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Engineer in Training (EIT), CA #16940 | Experience: 3 years GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 14 Rosanna Southern, EIT | Performance Metrics Support
Rosanna’s decade as a transportation engineer specializing in traffic engineering and transportation planning has allowed her to work closely with dozens of local California agencies on short- and long-range planning and engineering efforts. This experience comprises the analysis of traffic operations at interchanges to assist in the design process and use of travel demand models to analyze different scenarios for forecasting traffic volumes.

Rosanna provides multimodal operational analysis for a variety of complex projects aimed at analyzing traffic operations, and she typically oversees traffic impact fee studies, corridor studies, general plan circulation elements, and complete street plans.

Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Engineer-in-Training, VA #420063509 | Experience: 10 years Jeff Cooke | Survey Support
Jeff has 22 years as a field surveyor. His background includes experience with all aspects of surveying, including base mapping, construction staking, property surveys, American Land Title Association (ALTA) surveys, control surveys, and topographic surveys. He has also assisted with county surveyor items for specific clients. Jeff has worked on roadway, highways, interchanges, rivers, residential and subdivision projects, as well as commercial and office development. Related projects within California where Jeff provided survey services include the State Route 99/Oswald Road Intersection for Sutter County and the City of Rio Dell's Safe Routes to School project.

Qualifications: AS, General Education | Experience: 22 years Jorge Vanegas-Moran, EIT | Public Engagement Support
Jorge works collaboratively with our staff from varying offices to provide civil engineering and traffic engineering support including complete street plans, safety analyses, traffic operations analyses reports, Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) reports, plan preparation, and estimates. He will support our public engagement efforts by utilizing his proficiency in Spanish to help develop outreach strategies that will allow Spanish-speaking community members to engage in a results-driven process, creating a synergy that generates effective public engagement outcomes and ensures all of Waterford's community members are informed and heard by the City and project stakeholders.

Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Engineer in Training (EIT), CA #157357 | Experience: 7 years Paige Thornton | GIS Development
Paige is an analyst who provides support on a variety of planning and land use projects related to active transportation and multimodal corridor and connectivity planning. With extensive technical project experience utilizing GIS, data analysis and cartographic techniques, Paige excels in managing and analyzing spatial and nonspatial data, plan development, and supporting public engagement efforts.

Qualifications: BA, American Studies and Political Science (Minor: Urban Studies and Planning) | Experience: 3 years
The GHD project team includes nearly
100% of the City's LRSP project team.

Project team continuity will ensure
familiarity with the City, project location,
and local project stakeholders to support
an easily implementable corridor plan that
the City and community of Waterford will
be proud of.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 15 → 2. Background
Currently, GHD is performing complete streets
projects across the state. From Redding to
Long Beach and out to La Quinta, we have been
instrumental in the redevelopment of vital downtown
areas for communities across California for several
decades. We are enhancing the human experience
of priority places and spaces and setting up cities to
meet today’s demands and future successes. Our
team is ready to apply our unique blend of local and
statewide expertise to this transformational City
project.

The table below summarizes our team's
demonstrated recent local experience and ability to
incorporate the key considerations described in the
Request for Proposal (RFQ). Detailed descriptions
of the GHD team’s recent similar projects are further
detailed in Section 3 beginning on page 24.

Expertise GHD Recent Project Experience in California Value to the City Corridor/
Intersection
Analysis
– State Road (SR) 36 Complete Streets and Context Sensitive Streetscape Plan
– Old Redwood Highway Corridor Enhancement Plan
– Eureka Broadway Multimodal Corridor Plan
– Eastside Transportation Corridor Improvement Study
– Alamo Traffic Safety Improvements
– Heart of Fairfield Infrastructure Planning, Design, and Financial Planning Services
– Broadway Complete Streets
→ Knowledge of the existing
corridor through the
sucessful delivery of the
City's LRSP and insights
from other agency
corridor planning projects
throughout California.

Active
Transportation
– Waterford Local Road Safety Plan
– State Road (SR) 36 Complete Streets and Context Sensitive Streetscape Plan
– Old Redwood Highway Corridor Enhancement Plan
– Eureka Broadway Multimodal Corridor Plan
– Valley Springs Town Center Connectivity Plan, Complete Streets
– Eastside Transportation Corridor Improvement Study
– Imola Avenue Corridor Complete Streets Improvement Plan – Heart of Fairfield Infrastructure Planning, Design, and Financial Planning Services
– Broadway Complete Streets
→ Understanding and expertise
in delivering multimodal
studies for all users that
supports the community
and local businesses.

Public Outreach – Waterford Local Road Safety Plan
– State Road (SR) 36 Complete Streets and Context Sensitive Streetscape Plan
– Eureka Broadway Multimodal Corridor Plan
– Eastside Transportation Corridor Improvement Study
– Bell Road at I-80 Interchange
– Old Redwood Highway Corridor Enhancement Plan
– Valley Springs Town Center Connectivity Plan, Complete Streets
→ Effective transportation
and traffic engineering- and
planning-oriented public
outreach approach, virtually
and in person, including
Spanish translation.

Environmental
Considerations
– Eastside Transportation Corridor Improvement Study
– Old Redwood Highway Corridor Enhancement Plan
– Fulton Road Widening and Improvement
– Jackson Sutter Street Extension
→ With our team's local
experience, we can ensure
your project meets local
environmental requirements.

Coordination with
Caltrans and other
State of California
agencies
– Waterford Local Road Safety Plan
– Valley Springs Town Center Connectivity Plan, Complete Streets
– Imola Avenue Corridor Complete Streets Improvement Plan → Understanding of Caltrans
processes and requirements
for a successful project
to turn a streamlined
implementation plan into
grant ready projects.

The GHD team brings proven project experience to the City of Waterford.

Yosemite Boulevard by the high
school (Reinway Avenue): This
signalized intersection recently had
leading pedestrian intervals and extended walk
times for pedestrians. There is a Caltrans ADA
improvement project underway that will include
curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, and pedestrian
signal upgrades to zccessible pedestrian signals
with countdown timers at Reinway Avenue,
Western Avenue, and F Street. High visibility
school crosswalks would also be a recommended
improvement.

Project Understanding
The City has a desire to plan and design Yosemite
Boulevard as a complete street with continuous
facilities for all road users, improved safety
of crossings and mitigation of other high-risk
characteristics, and operational improvements,
which will lend to an overall reduction of greenhouse
gas emissions. With a current population of about
9,000, this city is located approximately 10 miles
east of Modesto, California and is known as the
Gateway to Recreation with Yosemite Boulevard
connecting to several lakes/reservoirs and Yosemite
Gold Country. This regional state highway is the
main corridor through the City and serves a variety
of users to include pedestrians, bicyclists, transit
riders, passenger cars, and heavy trucks for freight,
with a mix of traffic that includes local, recreational, and regional trips. The City of Waterford General
Plan Vision 2025 evaluates how the City growth
and development will occur. This plan describes
the “new-urbanism” design principal and goals in
providing solutions for existing problems and longterm growth. These goals include the development of a “sustainable” community that has a balance of
job-creating opportunities and vibrant commercial
districts with “livable” neighborhoods.

The F Street major signalized
intersection with connection to
Oakdale to the north and Turlock Lake
State Park and Hickman and Montpelier to
the south. There is a flashing beacon for the
signal warning sign on the approaches due to
the horizontal curve through the intersection.

East of this intersection to the west of River
Pointe Drive, Yosemite Boulevard changes to a
two lane roadway with no dedicated turn lanes.

Intersection improvements would be evaluated
through the Plan with overall relation to the
corridor.

Yosemite Boulevard at
Pasadena Avenue: The
City recently added a
RRFB at this location as an interim
measure to enhance the pedestrian
crossing. However, the City has a
desire to provide the frontage road
improvements at the Yosemite
Boulevard and Pasadena Avenue
intersection and east of Center Street
in the ultimate right-of-way location.

Yosemite Boulevard and Pasadena
Avenue is also identified as a future
traffic signal through a CMAQ grant.

Yosemite Boulevard at
E Street (City offices):

Currently, there is no exclusive
eastbound left turn lane for E Street.

It is noted that vehicles still make this
movement on E Street. Additionally,
Waterford’s Police Department,
Stanislaus Consolidated Fire
Department, and Waterford City Hall
are located on this street. Therefore,
it is important to provide convenient
access for our citizens and emergency
responders.

Yosemite Boulevard at Tim
Bell: This interection has no
dedicated turn lanes and a
significant grade on Tim Bell on the
southbound approach that was a
factor in a recent bicycle to vehicle
fatal collision. Improvements along the
corridor and at this intersection will be
evaluated with the Plan.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 16 GHD's knowledge of Yosemite Boulevard provides our team with a deep understanding of the corridor's challenges that allows them to begin developing solid, implementable solutions for the City right away.

In improving the livability and roadway safety for the
City, it is important to focus on a complete street
design for Yosemite Boulevard. With the current
configuration, Yosemite Boulevard has sporadic and
disconnected pedestrian facilities, lacks dedicated
bicycle facilities, and has wide travel lanes which
can encourage drivers to exceed the speed limit.

As an important connection to commercial services
such as retail and restaurants, as well as Waterford
High School and several houses of worship, it is
critical to create a safe, comfortable environment for
people walking and bicycling, while allowing efficient
movement of commercial and passenger vehicles.

In addition, throughout the process and various
milestones of the Plan development, public outreach
and engagement will be conducted to gain feedback
and input from the residents, business owners, and
overall citizens of Waterford. There will be a project
website on the Social Pinpoint platform that allows
an interactive map, surveys, and project documents
to be stored. Also, we will work with the City to
provide meeting flyers in both English and Spanish
that can be easily mailed in utility bills, emailed,
posted, or downloaded from the website. It will also
be important to have an interpreter presents at any
public meetings in conveying the information in both
English and Spanish.

Work Plan and Scope of
Services
We have carefully tailored our approach to this
project to meet the unique needs, objectives, and
challenges of the Yosemite Boulevard Corridor
Study and Plan. We’ve assembled a diverse team
of professionals with applied expertise in their
respective fields. This is a team that has delivered
similar complete streets projects in California
communities, on the state highway system, from
conceptual planning to full plans, specifications,
and estimates design packages. This expertise
and experience will be critical to the successful
completion of the Plan, starting with quality aerial
survey and data collection, to coordination with
Caltrans and the Advisory Committee, overall
analysis and design concepts, public engagement, to
project funding and implementation.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 17 Tasks
2022 2023 2024
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
1 Project Management &
Coordination
5/23/22 - 2/26/24
2 Existing Conditions
5/24/22 - 11/18/22
3 Analysis
8/15/22 - 10/15/23
4 Public Outreach
7/1/22 - 12/1/23
5 Advisory Committee Meeting
Formation and Notification
6/15/22 - 6/1/23
6 Draft and Final Corridor Plan
10/15/22 - 12/18/23
7 City Council Adoption &
Caltrans Approval
1/2/24 - 2/12/24
NTP 5/23/22
Project Schedule
Our proposed project schedule is shown below and is based on a May 23, 2022 Notice to Proceed (NTP) date.

Updates can be implemented to meet the City's requirements.

Kick-off Meeting 6/1/22
Advisory Committee Meeting 10/19/22
Advisory Committee Meeting 5/15/23
Community Meeting 8/23/22 Community Meeting 4/15/23
Milestones
Highlighted Meetings
Plan Adopted and Approved 2/12/22
Draft Plan 6/30/23 Final Plan 12/18/23
Task 1: Project Management and
Coordination
Project management and coordination begins with a
project kick-off meeting with City staff, led by Project Manager, Kathryn Kleinschmidt, and will include
bi-weekly coordination meetings as necessary,
coordination with the City to collect relevant data
and information, coordination with the project team,
and invoicing. Meetings beyond this will be at a time
and material phase with prior client authorization.

Task 2: Existing Conditions
We propose a four-pronged approach to establishing
and documenting existing conditions along Yosemite
Boulevard, including data collection for aerial and
ground footage and collection of applicable past
plans and analysis, desktop reconnaissance, field
reconnaissance, and geospatial development and
database.

2.1 Survey and Data Collection
Brian Howard will lead GHD’s survey efforts,
leveraging our in-house drone and photogrammetry
capabilities to develop an aerial base. The aerial
footage will be supplemented by ground footage
to help demonstrate challenges faced by users at
ground level.

Other data collection will be led by a variety of team
members, based on their respective focus areas.

Past plans, including the Draft Stanislaus Council
of Governments Non-Motorized Transportation
Plan and Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable
Communities Strategy, Waterford General Plan
and LRSP (prepared by GHD), and Caltrans District
10 Active Transportation Plan and California
Transportation Plan 2050, will be reviewed so that
identified constraints, issues, and recommendations
can be synthesized as part of our understanding of
the corridor. In addition, Stanislaus Regional Transit
bus serves the Modesto-Oakdale-Waterford region
and those transit routes and stops will be mapped to
understand the areas where there are a mix of users.

Available environmental screening maps, record
searches, publicly available transportation data,
demographic data, and existing street and active
transportation networks will be compiled in a unified
geospatial database along with the field data. This
will include building footprints, land uses, community
points of interests, truck routes, speed limits, collision analysis, and Big Data (including origin/destination
patterns by mode and purpose) from Replica. Data
will be reviewed so identified constraints, issues, and recommendations can be synthesized as part of our
understanding of the corridor.

2.2 Field Reconnaissance
Kendra Ramsey will lead the team’s field
reconnaissance efforts, leading site walks that
include identification of opportunities and
constraints, observations of travel patterns,
system characteristics, land use/place types, and
identification of corridors within the corridor. The
team, including project engineer Daniel Kehrer, will
conduct the field reconnaissance using handheld
devices to capture and georeference infrastructure
components and photographs importable into
AutoCAD and GIS. This field work, in concert with
desktop reconnaissance community input and traffic
data, will establish a strong basis for development of
recommendations.

2.3 Geospatial Development and Database
The Geospatial Database, or GIS environment, will be
developed by Paige Thornton, a geospatial analyst
with a transportation planning background, to serve
as a primary performance analysis tool. Using GIS
data developed during the LRSP and collected from
local and regional sources, we will be able to identify the current level of traffic stress (LTS) for bicyclists on the Yosemite Boulevard corridor. The measures
of low-stress connectivity established in the LTS
methodology to ascertain the current stress level for
bicyclists using Yosemite Boulevard. The distribution
of LTS score throughout the corridor will be mapped
in GIS. Connectivity “islands” within the low-stress
network will be identified (isolated pockets with no
low-stress connectivity). These islands dramatically
reduce the number and length of potential bicycle
route connections within the corridor. This analysis
will help identify opportunities for infrastructure
changes to reduce the stress level on the corridor.

Similarly, bringing in the safety analysis from the
LRSP and honing in further on the hot spots on the
corridor will allow us to pinpoint the critical locations for safety countermeasures, as well as systemic
changes to apply to the corridor as a whole.

Other items for geospatial development will include
mapping existing pedestrian facilities for sidewalks,
curb ramps, crosswalks, and identifying future
pedestrian improvements in proposed improvements
that might be underway or recommended per this
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 18 Plan. The GIS database will also include mapping the
current transit routes and stops, utilities, and drainage features within the corridor, and other constraints
that need to be captured in the Plan.

After review of pertinent studies, the findings will be summarized in a technical memorandum including
the GIS maps.

2.4 Advisory Committee Meeting
Following development of the Corridor Summary of
Existing Conditions, we will present the document to
the Advisory Committee, further discussed in Task
5: Advisory Committee Formation and Notification,
and accept and record their input. The Advisory
Committee will be helpful in providing their local
knowledge of the issues on Yosemite Boulevard from
their perspectives and/or constituencies, as well as
identifying opportunity and constraint areas.

Task 2 Deliverables:
– Existing Conditions Assessment Report of
Yosemite Boulevard corridor based on aerial and
data collection including evaluation of motorized
and non-motorized modes
– Field Reconnaissance Report of the project
team site visit and assessment of the Yosemite
Boulevard corridor to include opportunities,
constraints, goals, and objectives to be
addressed by the Plan
– Advisory Committee meeting agenda and
PowerPoint, handouts, meeting summary, and
log of comments to be incorporated into the plan

3. Analysis
The Plan will analyze automobile/truck traffic,
bicycle, and pedestrian configuration alternatives,
intersection geometrics across and parallel to
Yosemite Boulevard using data and public input
from Task 2: Existing Conditions. Stakeholders,
Advisory Committee, and public meeting input
and recommendations will help inform the analysis
and overall alternatives. This analysis will include
roadway and intersection operational analysis, safety
analysis, and proposed safety benefits with different
improvements and safety countermeasures, right-ofway and environmental assessment, and a constraints analysis matrix for fatal flaws in the proposed
alternatives. We recommend that three different
alternative concept plans be developed with planning
level cost estimates for input from stakeholders, the
Advisory Committee, and the public.

3.1 Baseline Performance Assessment
The analysis of existing conditions will build directly off the aerial footage, field reconnaissance, and
desktop reconnaissance efforts previously outlined.

The performance assessment will be led by Todd
Tregenza who managed the development of the
US 101 Broadway Multimodal Corridor Plan. We will
apply the methodologies outlined in the Caltrans
Corridor Planning Process Guide (February 2020),
including the Smart Mobility Framework, resulting in
a performance-based plan that aligns with statewide
funding and prioritization rubrics.

This analysis will lead into the development of the
preferred alternative where an official Plan line based on identified right-of-way needed for improvements
for the alternative. The resulting Plan line will develop actual future right-of-way needs and guide project
development priorities.

3.2 Complete Streets Assessment
Kendra Ramsey will lead the assessment for
active modes of travel to supplement the broader
transportation assessment. Her history working with
disadvantaged and underreported communities
throughout California and experience developing
plans on the state highway system will allow nuanced
exploration of the barriers and gaps for active
transportation for disadvantaged residents, as well as
identification of key strategies to improve Yosemite
Boulevard. An LTS analysis and connectivity index
will be completed to document the ease of traveling
on Yosemite Boulevard safely by bicyclist age and
ability.

3.3 Evaluation, Feasibility, and
Prioritization
Quantitative analyses of improvement projects and
strategies will include a variety of quantitative metrics to supplement the many qualitative factors that
are important to stakeholders and members of the
public.

Active transportation improvement benefits will
be quantified using the NCHRP 552 Guidelines
for Analysis of Bicycle Infrastructure Investments
to estimate mode shift and associated reductions
in Vehicle Miles of Travel. Safety benefits will be
calculated using crash modification factors from
the Highway Safety Manual and Caltrans Local
Roadway Safety Manual. Air quality benefits
and GHG reductions will be quantified using the
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 19 emissions calculator developed for the California
Transportation Commission by California Air
Resources Board. Consideration of benefit to
disadvantaged communities along the corridor will
also be incorporated to help assess potential for
greatest benefit in prioritizing segments.

3.4 Additional Metrics
Additional performance metrics will be developed
and utilized to differentiate between alternative
concepts and to calculate monetizable and nonmonetizable benefits of priority projects later in the development of the Plan. These additional metrics
are often used in a comparative context, weighing
concepts against each other and against existing
conditions. These include:
– Air quality and greenhouse gas
– Public health
– Climate adaptation and resiliency
– Economic impact

3.5 Advisory Committee Meetings
We will hold an Advisory Committee meeting to
review alternatives and performance metrics to gain
feedback and input for the preferred alternative.

Task 3: Deliverables
– Development of configuration, intersection, and
geometrics alternatives for review with the City,
Caltrans, and Advisory Committee
– Using existing conditions report, maps, and
interviews, prepare configuration, intersection
geometrics alternatives
– Evaluation of corridor alternatives and creation
of draft summary of projects with prioritization
matrix
– Advisory Committee meeting/community
workshop about draft analysis documents.

GHD will provide agenda, meeting documents,
PowerPoint, meeting materials, and meeting
summaries.

4. Public Outreach

4.1 Develop Public Outreach Strategy
We will begin our outreach process by incorporating
results and communication tools from past
engagement efforts, including the recent LRSP,
gleaning the recommendations, preferences, and
needs identified. From there, we will build a public
outreach strategy that will guide the outreach
program throughout the project. The strategy will
include the purpose and logistics for each event,
meeting, and virtual tool, and include content to
be developed, anticipated outcomes, and key
stakeholders to engage.

The community outreach strategy will emphasize
equity, and advertisement methods and meeting
accommodations will be considerate of targeting
disadvantaged communities and populations
including low-income families, Spanish speakers,
people with disabilities, older adults, youth, and
children. Advertisements will be placed in both
digital and hardcopy formats in areas or destinations
accessed by disadvantaged communities and can
also be placed in utility bills as a flyer.

GHD will develop a project web page to provide
a one-stop-shop for the public and stakeholders
to visit to learn about the project and provide
comments, similar to the website we prepared for
the LRSP. The platform allows our staff to customize
a project website that includes project information,
interactive map, surveys, project documents,
workshop recordings, and notifications for upcoming
events. The website will be provided in English with
built-in translation services that will be enabled by
detecting the user browser settings to match their
language.

To support outreach throughout the project, GHD
will prepare updates share on the City’s social media
channels. Updates will be provided for engagement
opportunities such as workshops or meetings and
include an update of appropriate length for the
medium as well as an image. Notification emails will
be prepared for distribution by the City and will
also be supplied to Advisory Committee members
for sharing. We will address equity in evaluating
the locations in the City that are identified as
disadvantaged or unrepresented communities within
the Yosemite Boulevard corridor.

4.2 Community Meetings
GHD will plan and facilitate two community meetings.

One will introduce the Plan to the community and
gather input on issues, challenges, and opportunities,
and the second will be to receive feedback on draft
recommendations and work toward consensus
on priority improvements. Interactive modules will
support general project information to help the
public understand technical information. We have
successfully utilized participatory budgeting tools
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 20 such as “construct your own street” activities where
participants select facilities to plan a future street
improvement, and other ways to help the public
engage with technical content.

Events will be advertised with graphically rich
meeting materials that will be shared using online
media, list-serves, and physical posting to public
locations, as well as through networks of the
community and stakeholder organizations on the
Advisory Committee. Events will feature large-scale
maps and illustrations with engaging interactive
elements. To the extent feasible, the interaction
opportunities at the workshops will be mirrored using
the online platform, including preference surveys and
map-based input on issues and concerns. Events will
be either in-person or virtual, based on consultation
with the City and current health guidance. Materials
will be provided in English and Spanish, and Spanish
interpretation will be available at all events.

At each event, attendees will be asked to sign up for
project updates, allowing the project team to keep
in communication throughout the project. Updates
can be sent when additional meetings are held and
as documents are available on the website for review.

The contact list will also be used to publicize the
availability of any online feedback tool, such as a
survey or map-based feedback tool.

Feedback from these events, along with existing
conditions and the baseline assessment, will
form the basis for corridor goals, objectives, and
performance measures, and shape the development
of Plan recommendations. Public outreach will be
summarized following each event and provided as
a chapter of the draft Plan to support future grant
applications.

Task 4: Deliverables
– Promote and advertise community meetings
with coordination with the City's current website,
social media platforms, and production of flyers
to be posted around town and mailed in utility
bills
– GHD will organize, plan, and participate in two
community meetings and provide all meeting
materials

5. Advisory Committee Formation
and Notification
During the kick-off meeting, GHD will work with
the City to identify and track potential Advisory
Committee members. We will build off existing
stakeholder lists from the LRSP, modifying
as appropriate due to the focus on Yosemite
Boulevard. Likely members include Caltrans District
10, Waterford School District, Waterford Public
Works, Stanislaus Consolidated Fire District, AMR
Ambulance Service, Stanislaus County Transit,
Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Office, Modesto Irrigation
District, ATT, PG&E, Charter Cable, the quarries
east of town, and any identified community or
neighborhood organization with an interest in
transportation or focus on disadvantaged residents.

In past projects, we have engaged groups such as
local or regional foundations, statewide non-profits
with local projects, neighborhood associations,
bicycle and pedestrian advocates, and older adult
groups. The project team will utilize the Advisory
Committee contact list developed during this first
meeting to solicit participation from identified
potential members. The Advisory Committee
will serve as a sounding board prior to public
engagement, ensuring key stakeholders are informed
of project developments and able to weigh in.

Obtaining consensus within the Advisory Committee
on priorities and improvement strategies will be
an important precursor to obtaining wider public
support for project implementation.

GHD will prepare the agenda and materials for
each meeting, focusing on key areas for Advisory
Committee feedback. In the beginning it is important
to develop comprehensive visions and goals for the
plan. We find that focusing each meeting on specific
tasks, such as discussing goals and objectives,
a draft document provided for review, or other
similar focus, helps make the most of Advisory
Committee members’ valuable time. Meetings will be
held virtually and recorded for those who miss the
meeting, and made available to members and City
staff. Discussions will also be recorded in meeting
minutes and attendance records kept for the project
file. A Spanish interpreter will be available if needed, and presentation materials will prepared in English
and Spanish, if needed. All Advisory Committee
meetings will be included in the public outreach
summary and on the City project website provided
as a chapter in the Plan to support future grant
applications.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 21 The meeting agendas and PowerPoint will be covered
within the Task they occur. However, Task 5 will
cover the preparation and distribution of meeting
announcements to City staff, Planning Commission,
and City Council. In addition, post Advisory
Committee meeting agendas and meeting summaries
including action items will be provided to the City to
post on the City project website.

Task 5: Deliverables
– Help form the Advisory Committee with initial
outreach emails to stakeholders and maintain a
contact list
– Prepare and distribute meeting announcements
and provide the agenda and summaries of the
meeting including action items for the City to
post on the project website.

6. Draft and Final Corridor Plan
GHD will prepare the Working Draft Corridor Plan
including all content identified in the RFQ scope. The
document will be aesthetically-pleasing, complete
with graphics to help with public understanding of
the content, and include an implementation plan.

Prioritized projects will be bundled into project
packages suitable for grant applications. For
these packages, a toolbox of design concepts
can be developed subject to project budget.

These concepts will be prepared to support grant
applications by including the relevant level of
detail and cost estimation for grant submission.

Identification of implementation steps, including
the potential fund sources or any other application
implementation method will also be discussed.

Following the City’s staff review of the Working Draft
Corridor Plan, we will revise based on one set of
consolidated, internally-consistent comments, and
produce a Public Draft Corridor Plan. We will develop
a presentation of the Public Draft Corridor Plan
for use at meetings with the Advisory Committee,
Planning Commission, City Council, Caltrans District
10, and Stanislaus Council of Governments for
feedback and comments. GHD will assist the City
in presenting the Public Draft Corridor Plan and will
use online outreach to gather stakeholder feedback.

Notifications will be sent to contact lists developed
during the outreach program, web content soliciting
feedback will be posted, and GHD will work with the
Advisory Committee and other key stakeholders to
notify their constituencies of the ability to review and comment.

GHD will compile a comment log, and present to the
City for review and direction. Following receipt of
direction, GHD will prepare the Final Draft Corridor
Plan.

Task 6: Deliverables
– Deliver a Working Draft Corridor Plan for review,
comments, and feedback from the City
– Deliver a Draft Corridor Plan for coordination
with the Advisory Committee and stakeholders
– Prepare the staff report, PowerPoint
presentation, and meeting announcement to be
sent to the Advisory Committee and interested
party plan list; post on the project website; and
coordinate social media posts for comments and
feedback. Any comments will be summarized and
addressed.
– Prepare the Final Draft Corridor Plan in PDF
format and editable electronic format with 10
bound copies
– Present the Final Draft Corridor Plan with the
Official Plan Line of the preferred alternative at a
public hearing before the Planning Commission
for recommendation to City Council for their
adoption. GHD will provide all meeting materials.

7. City Council Adoption and
Caltrans Approval
After recommendations from the Planning
Commission to present the Final Corridor Plan to City
Council for adoption, GHD will work with the City to
get it on the City Council agenda for adoption. This
will include a Plan that addresses the comments with
a preferred alternative and a summary of next steps
towards implementation, with acknowledgments to all
stakeholders including Caltrans.

Task 7: Deliverables
– Present the Final Corridor Plan to City Council
for adoption. GHD will provide the meeting
presentation and assist with agenda report and
resolution.
– Coordinate the Final Corridor Plan with Caltrans
for their approval
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 22 GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 23 → 3. Services and History
The GHD team brings an unparalleled mix of
benefits to the City, including recognized roadway
planning and engineering expertise, recent similar
corridor study projects, a unique understanding of
Yosemite Boulevard from leading the City's recent
LRSP project, and familiar local resources in a wide
variety of technical areas, as well as a long history
of coordination with Caltrans on similar projects in
District 10. We are proud of our strong performance
on corridor planning, complete streets, and active
transportation projects for our municipal clients,
and we have an excellent performance record with
municipal and government agencies throughout
California over the past 70+ years. Our past and
current relevant projects include the following
transportation services:
– Corridor/Intersection Analysis
– Safety Analysis
– Signal Timing, Coordination, Design, Review
– Traffic Impact Studies
– Warrant Studies
– Parking Studies
– Roadway, Intersection, Roundabout Design
– Street Circulation Planning/Design
– Bicycle Facility Planning/Design
– Pedestrian Facility Planning/Design
– Traffic Calming Assessment/Design
– Environmental Studies Assistance
– Data Collection
– Active Transportation
– Public Outreach
Our highlighted projects beginning on the next
page were selected based on their relevancy to
the project. Additional relevant and recent projects
throughout California that GHD has provided similar
services for include.
– East Broadway Road Complete Street, City of
Long Beach
– Ukiah Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet and
Utilities Project, City of Ukiah
– Downtown Infrastructure Improvements Project,
City of Rohnert Park
– Windsor River Road/Windsor Road Intersection
Improvements, Town of Windsor
– La Quinta Village Road Diet, City of La Quinta
– Downtown Redding Streets Circulation, City of
Redding
– California Boulevard/Taft Street Improvements,
City of San Luis Obispo
– Willits Main Street Road Diet, City of Willits
– Jaguar Way/Windsor Road Pedestrian and
Bicycle Improvements, Town of Windsor
– Petaluma Complete Streets, City of Petaluma
– Downtown Improvements, City of Petaluma
– Downtown/West Estudillo Corridor, City of San
Leandro
– Downtown Improvements - Main Street, City of
Fort Bragg
– Hopland Main Street Corridor Study, Mendocino
County
GHD's effective public outreach effort for the Eureka Broadway Multimodal Corridor Plan resulted in $12.5M to implement plan elements through the competitive $100M Complete Streets SHOPP reservation.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 24 Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)
Waterford, California
Yosemite Boulevard (SR 132) is main roadway through Waterford. This roadway, under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, was experiencing fatal and severe injury collisions. With GHD’s Kathryn Kleinschmidt, PE, PTOE as project manager, GHD led the collision analysis in identifying fatal and injury collisions and collision trends within the City and on this main corridor through the City.

Caltrans was engaged throughout the LRSP process as a stakeholder.

Through our meetings, different safety countermeasures were implemented, traffic analysis was conducted, and safety improvements were planned for future funding. The City was successful in securing a Sustainable Communities Grant to develop a complete street plan.

The City’s needs and data collection efforts were defined as the starting point. GHD cross-checked the past five years of collision reports with the same past five years of collision data from SWITRS and TIMS in building a comprehensive collision set that was further dissected to identify fatal and injury collisions, primary collision factor, bicycle and pedestrian collisions.

The LRSP stakeholder working group met twice to discuss the collision data, current safety projects, and recommended countermeasures and projects.

Cross-collaboration occurred with Caltrans for safety improvements to include ADA improvements, extended walk times, and pedestrian leading intervals. Based on the project flyer for the Social Pinpoint website in the utility mailing and subsequent Social Pinpoint website, the working group discussed the public comments and safety concerns. After Stakeholder review the Draft LRSP was provided on the public website for their comments. The Draft LRSP was finalized and adopted unanimously at City Council.

Client/Contracting Agency
City of Waterford
Project Completion Date
2021
Project Cost
$74,090
Staff Involved
Kathryn Kleinschmidt, Kamesh
Vedula, Faridur Rahman, Kiera
Bryant, Emily Darke
State Road (SR) 36 Complete Streets and
Context Sensitive Streetscape Plan
Chester, California
GHD is developing this comprehensive multi-modal study to determine and plan for transportation and streetscape improvements along the two-mile portion of Chester Main Street (SR 36) through the Town of Chester in the Lake Almanor community. The Plan will examine existing limitations to the highway’s function as a vibrant Main Street, including its primary orientation towards vehicular traffic and the lack of sidewalks, bike lanes, and adequate public spaces for community activity.

Recommendations will be developed in partnership with the community to provide safety and connectivity improvements for people using all modes of transportation. Key improvements will be developed using Complete Street design elements and modifying intersections to address specific collision hot spots. Improvement recommendations will be evaluated to assess benefits of the project to safety, mobility, and health, and will further consider potential environmental impacts, social equity impacts, public health impacts, and economic impacts to support future grant applications.

Outreach for the project will be conducted both in-person and virtually and include multiple workshops, an organized walking and bus tour, and online engagement.

Client/Contracting Agency
Plumas County Transportation
Commission
Project Completion Date
2024 (anticipated)
Project Cost
$535,652
Staff Involved
Kamesh Vedula, Kendra
Ramsey, Todd Tregenza, Jenny
Godwin, Paige Thornton
Project Features
; Corridor/Intersection
Analysis
; Safety Analysis
; Signal Timing, Coordination,
Design, Review
; Safety
; Data Collection
; Public Outreach
Project Features
; Data Collection
; Public Outreach
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 25 Old Redwood Highway Corridor
Enhancement Plan
Windsor, California
Client/Contracting Agency
Town of Windsor
Project Completion Date
2022
Project Cost
$265,585
Staff Involved
Kendra Ramsey, Jenny Godwin,
Paige Thornton
GHD completed a comprehensive corridor study to reimagine and revitalize the Old Redwood Highway Corridor to improve multimodal mobility and support a vibrant economy.

The Plan evaluates current usage, conditions, and past planning efforts, along with data on collisions and travel patterns. Significant public engagement included virtual workshops, an interactive public website, key stakeholder interviews and a public survey, as well as in-person outreach at community events. Outreach materials were distributed in English as well as Spanish, with direct engagement conducted with several community leaders in the Spanish-speaking community. A multilingual project website provided a map-based feedback tool to provide location-specific comments, as well as a project survey.

The Plan presents a comprehensive set of transportation and placemaking recommendations to transform Old Redwood Highway into a Complete Street with connected and comfortable for uses of all ages, abilities, and modes. The recommendations are presented as a series of packages by segment of the corridor, including transportation recommendations, placemaking and greening concepts, and stormwater improvements.

Cost estimates and project prioritization round out the recommendations, assisting the Town with future pursuit of grant funding.

Project Features
; Corridor/Intersection Analysis
; Safety Analysis
; Street Circulation
Planning/Design
; Pedestrian Facility
Planning/Design
; Data Collection
; Public Outreach
Client/Contracting Agency
Humboldt County Association
of Governments
Project Completion Date
2021
Project Cost
$345,000
Staff Involved
Kendra Ramsey, Todd Tregenza,
Ethan Gold, Rosanna Southern,
Paige Thornton
GHD developed a multimodal plan for HCAOG to address longstanding challenges on the Broadway (US 101) corridor, including traffic safety, lack of multimodal access, and congestion. In the City of Eureka, Broadway, is a north-south arterial used for regional goods movement and travel.

The highway poses a barrier to east-west multimodal access between neighborhoods, jobs and the Waterfront Trail. The plan presents a feasible concept that addresses critical operational and safety challenges with solutions that obtained widespread stakeholder support.

The preferred concept’s most prominent feature is a new US 101 couplet solution that splits directional travel along the corridor, improving vehicular operations while freeing up significant right-of-way in the existing alignment to accommodate Class IV separated bikeways, improved sidewalks and transit lanes.

Other improvements include high-visibility pedestrian crossings, improved access to existing and proposed trails, new roadway connections between couplets and beautification opportunities.

During the public outreach effort, appeals to address high rates of bicycle/ pedestrian fatal crashes generated urgency to develop near-term safety solutions. GHD worked with the City of Eureka, HCAOG and Caltrans D1, to secure $12.5M to implement plan elements through the competitive $100M Complete Streets SHOPP reservation.

Project Features
; Corridor/Intersection Analysis
; Safety Analysis
; Signal Timing, Coordination,
Design, Review
; Roadway, Intersection,
Roundabout Design
; Active Transportation
; Public Outreach
Eureka Broadway Multimodal Corridor Plan
Eureka, California
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 26 Valley Springs Town Center Connectivity
Plan, Complete Streets
Valley Springs, California
Client/Contracting Agency
Calaveras Council of
Governments
Project Completion Date
2020
Project Cost
$219,000
Staff Involved
Kamesh Vedula, Kendra Ramsey,
Todd Tregenza, Paige Thornton
The Calaveras Council of Governments (CCOG), in partnership with the County of Calaveras and Caltrans, retained GHD to prepare a “complete streets” capital infrastructure and prioritization plan in the community of Valley Springs. The plan provides a prioritized, implementable, communitybacked, and grant-eligible list of multimodal infrastructure projects within the “Town Center” area of Valley Springs. Within the “Town Center” nonresidential destinations include a mix of smaller businesses, churches, community parks and services, and the Valley Springs Elementary School.

The adjacent state highways provide access to additional local and regional destinations, including shopping centers and large retailers, recreational activities at New Hogan Lake, and destinations beyond Valley Springs and Calaveras County.

The project included four public workshops, several individual and group stakeholder meetings, and outreach at a Back-to-School Night; it quantifies existing issues and opportunities, provides evaluation of improvement alternatives, and establishes need, purpose, benefit, and cost for improvements. The improvements include context-sensitive treatments that provide safe mobility and accessibility in the “Town Center,” in particular in and around Valley Springs Elementary School and the “Town Center” neighborhood, enhancing the built environment for all modes of travel including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit vehicles, trucks, and motorists.

Project Features
; Data Collection
; Public Outreach
Eastside Transportation Corridor
Improvement Study
Fresno, California
Client/Contracting Agency
Fresno Council of Governments
Project Completion Date
2021
Project Cost
$299,992
Staff Involved
Kendra Ramsey, Kamesh Vedula,
Rosanna Southern, Paige
Thornton
GHD developed this comprehensive multi-modal study to determine and plan for future transportation needs of the eastern portion of Fresno County.

The study provides land use, transportation, economic, and environmental analysis to support the development of a future transportation needs framework. Recommendations span the length of each corridor and provide safety and connectivity improvements for people walking, bicycling, accessing transit, and driving. Key improvements include closing gaps and eliminating barriers for pedestrians and bicyclists, and modifying intersections to address specific collision hot spots with proven safety countermeasures. Benefits of the projects to safety, mobility, health, vehicle miles travelled reduction, and air quality are quantified to support future grant applications.

Outreach for the project was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and included multiple workshops presented in both Spanish and English utilizing Zoom interpretation “rooms.” Outreach was also conducted to key stakeholders via an advisory committee of local agency officials, as well as direct outreach to business and other corridor stakeholders.

Following completion of the study, high priority projects were selected, and conceptual illustrations developed. The conceptual illustrations will support the local agencies in pursing grant funding for implementation.

Project Features
; Corridor/Intersection Analysis
; Safety Analysis
; Data Collection
; Active Transportation
; Public Outreach
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 27 Imola Avenue Corridor Complete Streets
Improvement Plan
Napa, California
Client/Contracting Agency
Napa Valley Transportation
Authority
Project Completion Date
2020
Project Cost
$255,000
Staff Involved
Kamesh Vedula, Kendra Ramsey,
Todd Tregenza, Rosanna
Southern
GHD developed a multimodal study for Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA) to document the current challenges and opportunities on the Imola Avenue corridor and recommend achievable solutions to implement the community vision for a vibrant, complete street.

The corridor extends 3.5 miles and includes alignments within Caltrans right of way (as SR 121) and through both City and County of Napa jurisdictions.

The goal of the corridor plan is to meet the diverse needs of the residential neighborhoods, businesses, and destinations along Imola Avenue. The plan delivered context-sensitive solutions that adapt to the character on each segment and block. Plan improvements were prioritized according to measures of effectiveness, including benefit-cost, constructability, and environmental stewardship.

Key improvements are a continuous Class IV bikeway from SR 29 over the Napa River, a separated Class I trail from SR 221 (Soscol) to Skyline Park, residential neighborhood bulbouts, and connections to Vine Trail. The Imola Avenue Corridor Complete Streets Improvement Plan provides NVTA, the City, and County of Napa, and Caltrans with a flexible and implementable road map to create a safer, more accessible multimodal corridor for the Napa community. The corridor plan presents a graphically-rich layout that walks readers through the corridor, with visuals that provide examples, explain tradeoffs, and show typical cross-sections to make the plan legible to the broader community. The plan was adopted in September 2020.

Project Features
; Safety Analysis
; Public Outreach
GHD worked with the NVTA, the City, County of Napa, Caltrans, and the community, to create a safer and more accessible multimodal corridor for the residential neighborhoods, businesses, and destinations along Imola Avenue and the community.

GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 28 Key Staff | Role Resume Qualifications
Kathryn Kleinschmidt, PE,
PTOE | Project Manager
and Advisory Committee
Lead

relationship with City and project stakeholders from leading the LRSP brings instant understanding of your project and project stakeholders and additional insight to your project to ensure a successful outcome.

Kamesh Vedula, PE, TE |
Principal-in-Charge and
QA/QC

traffic engineering experience on recent, relevant projects throughout the state, to ensure a quality project for the City.

Kendra Ramsey, AICP |
Complete Streets and
Public Engagment Lead

reach all stakeholders to build successful partnerships with community organizations to leverage the reach of valued local leaders.

Chryss Meier |
Environmental/Greenhouse
Gas Lead

specialty in air quality and greenhouse analysis that will support the City's environmental goals and requirements.

Todd Tregenza, AICP |
Performance Metrics Lead

California including securing funding on challenging corridors such as Caltrans rights-of-way in District 10. He will ensure the GHD team hits your project's strategic objectives.

Daniel Kehrer, PE, QSD/
QSP | Design Concepts
Lead

roadways, interchanges, complex intersections, rail
crossings, and site development projects supports the team in the devlopment of a buildable plan for the City.

Faridur Rahman, EIT |
Safety and
Countermeasure Lead

time reliability analysis, traffic analysis, and systematic safety analysis by processing big data and utilizing traffic evaluation software.

Brian Howard, PLS | Survey
Lead

full range of projects in the vast majority of California’s counties. → 4. Response Time
GHD achieves our success through our willingness
to listen and respond to individual client needs in a
timely manner. As illustrated in Section 3: Services
and History, our firm's experience matches well with
the type of work to be performed, so the City can be
assured that we will reliably deliver your project.

With over 10,000 employees around the world and
over 370 staff in California, GHD has the resources to
ensure your project is delivered on time and within
budget.

As a firm, we have recently completed over 40
corridor studies, complete street, and active
transportation projects in California alone, and are
well-experienced in serving our clients quickly.

Project manager, Kathryn Kleinschmidt, will manage
the team and regularly evaluate staff availability to
deliver dedicated resources to this project. Principalin-Charge, Kamesh Vedula, will ensure that Kathryn has timely access to all of the necessary technical
and personnel resources.

Our team, listed below, is comprised of local
professionals with the expertise and availability to
support the successful delivery of your project.

You can find more information in their resumes and
qualifications beginning on page 4.

SUPPORTING TEAM MEMBERS (qualifications begin on page 13): Carlos Rodriguez Mejia, EIT | Engineering Lead; Ethan Angold | Bike/ Pedestrian Lead; Jenny Godwin, AICP Candidate | Advisory Committee and Bike/Pedestrian Design Support; Emily Darke, EIT | Advisory Committee and Safety Support; Kiera Bryant, EIT | Public Engagement and Safety Support; Jorge Vanegas-Moran, EIT | Public Engagement Support; Rosanna Southern, EIT | Performance Metrics Support; Jeff Cooke | Survey Support; Paige Thornton | GIS Development GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 29 M u n icip a l A g e n cie s a n d G o v e rn m e nt
90%
R e p e at C li e nt s
75%
→ 5. Fees/Cost Proposal
Please find the Cost Proposal provided in a separately sealed envelope. → 6. Public Agencies
GHD specializes almost exclusively in municipal
engineering for cities, counties, and special districts.

Because of this, we understand the difference
between public sector design requirements and
private development. We believe that the best
engineering project not only provides the technical
solution, but also satisfies the environmental
requirements, public needs, funding limitations,
regulatory requirements, and political realities of the community. GHD brings a proven track record of
project delivery. We are project advocates and will
engage all project stakeholders in active dialogue to
advance the project goals. We work together with our
clients, transforming visions into reality.

We are proud of our long tradition of effective
relationships with repeat municipal clients. Ninety
percent of our clients are municipal agencies or
government entities, and approximately 75 percent of
our work comes from repeat clients. This track record
illustrates our in-depth knowledge of municipal
engineering, as well as our willingness to listen and
respond to individual clients' needs. It also speaks
to our clients’ confidence in our ability to deliver a
project.

GHD brings an unparalleled understanding of the
challenges faced by California municipalities, as well
as the proven ability to address those challenges.

Specific to the City's Yosemite Boulevard Corridor
project, GHD routinely manages and designs
complete streets in similar sized settings. Our
team has delivered similar public agency projects
throughout our California communities, including
the City's recent LRSP that included work along the
project site.

The GHD team we have selected for your project
specializes in municipal projects and have worked
with a dozens of California municipalities including:
– City of Waterford
– City of Santa Maria
– City of Cotati
– City of Vacaville
– City of Monterey
– City of Napa
– City of Arroyo Grande
– City of Costa Mesa
– City of Santa Rosa
– City of Healdsburg
– City of Shasta Lake
– City of Redding
– City of Camarillo
– City of Elk Grove
– City of Pismo Beach
– City of San Luis Obispo
– City of Yucaipa
– City of Anderson
– City of Fortuna
– City of Gustine
– City of St. Helena
– Town of Windsor
– County of Stanislaus
– Shasta County
– Fresno County
– County of Modoc
– Placer County
– County of Monterey
– Nevada County Transportation Commission
– San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
– El Dorado County Transportation Commission
– Calaveras Council of Governments
– Fresno Council of Governments
– Napa Valley Transportation Authority
GHD City of Waterford    Qualifications for Yosemite Avenue (SR 132) Corridor Study 30 Project | Location Project Details Project Description
Old Redwood Highway
Corridor Enhancement
Plan | Windsor, CA
Client: Town of Windsor
Contact: Alejandro Perez, Senior Civil Engineer,
Public Works Department
T: 707.838.5318
E: [email protected]
Dates: 2020-2022 | Cost: $265,585
→ A comprehensive corridor study
to reimagine and revitalize the
Old Redwood Highway Corridor
to improve multimodal mobility
and support a vibrant economy.

Eureka Broadway
Multimodal Corridor
Plan | Eureka, CA
Client: Humboldt County Association of Governments
Contact: Beth Burks, Executive Director
T: 707.444.8208
E: [email protected]
Dates: 2019-2021 | Cost: $345,000
→ A multimodal plan for HCAOG
to address longstanding
challenges on the Broadway
(US 101) corridor, including
traffic safety, lack of multimodal
access, and congestion.

Valley Springs Town
Center Connectivity
Plan, Complete Streets
| Valley Springs, CA
Client: Calaveras Council of Governments
Contact: Erin Kelly, Transportation Planner
T: 209.754.2096 ext. 101
E: [email protected]
Dates: 2018-2020 | Cost: $219,000
→ Preparation of a complete
streets capital infrastructure and
prioritization plan that provides
a prioritized, implementable,
community-backed, and
grant-eligible list of multimodal
infrastructure projects.

Eastside
Transportation
Corridor Improvement
Study | Fresno, CA
Client: Fresno Council of Governments
Contact: Jennifer Soliz, Associate Regional Planner,
Public Works Department
T: 559.233.4148 ext. 223
E: [email protected]
Dates: 2020-2021 | Cost: $299,992
→ A comprehensive multi-modal
study to determine and plan
for future transportation
needs of the eastern portion
of Fresno County.

Imola Avenue Corridor
Complete Streets
Improvement Plan |
Napa, CA
Client: Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA)
Contact: Diana Meehan,
Senior Program Planner-Administrator
T: 707.259.8327
E: [email protected]
Dates: 2018-2020 | Cost: $255,000
→ A multimodal study for NVTA to
document the current challenges
and opportunities on the Imola
Avenue corridor and recommend
achievable solutions to
implement the community vision
for a vibrant, complete street.
→ 7. References/Project Experience
GHD has been active in the design and development of transportation engineering projects in California for over 70 years. Sensitive to community and agency concerns, we offer strong project management to keep projects on schedule and within budget. GHD’s “total project” expertise and service-oriented approach will be vital to the execution of work required for the City's Yosemite Boulevard project.

The projects highlighted in Section 3: Services and History are diverse in their disciplines, illustrate our ability to address complex issues, and demonstrate our history of working as a collaborative team. They demonstrate the technical capabilities and experience of our project team’s work similar to the expected projects.

Please find client references below, with detailed project descriptions in Section 3: Services and History (beginning on page 24).

1 AGREEMENT FOR

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
(Between the City of Waterford
and GHD Inc.)
THIS AGREEMENT made this 19th day of May, 2022 between GHD Inc., having a principal place of business at 943 Reserve Drive, Roseville Ca. 95678, hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”, and The City of Waterford, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, 101 “E” Street, P.O.

Box 199, Waterford, CA 95386.

Legal Status of CITY
The City is a General Law City, a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of California.

Legal Status
The Consultant is a Corporation operating under the laws of the State of California and is in the business of Engineering and Planning services.

Business of CITY
The City performs municipal functions through its City and related entities.

Independent Contractor
In the performance of the work, duties and obligations devolving upon Consultant under this agreement, it is mutually agreed and understood that Consultant is an independent contractor, and the sole interest and responsibility of City is to assure that the services covered by this agreement shall be performed and rendered in a competent, efficient and satisfactory manner.

Work Schedule
Consultant will exercise its best efforts to complete tasks on the schedule agreed upon between Consultant and City’s representative, the City Manager.

Term of Agreement
This agreement shall become effective as of the date hereinabove stated and shall continue in effect as for 24 months. The City shall have the right to extend the term of this Contract.

Compensated Services to Be Performed by Consultant
Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in the proposal attached hereto as 2 Exhibit A. Work products as a result of this scope shall become the property of the City, and made available to the City at its request within a reasonable time of being requested.

Payment for all services performed by the Consultant shall be as set forth and shall be considered as full compensation for all personnel, consultants, materials, supplies, services and equipment used in carrying out the work described by this Contract.

Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:

1. General Liability:
$1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

2. Automobile Liability:
$1,000,000 per accident, bodily injury and property damage.

3. Employers Liability:
$1,000,000 per accident, bodily injury or disease.

4. Workers Compensation: Statutory limits as required by the State of California.

Consultant shall provide City with Certificates of Insurance certifying the above insurance requirements.

Indemnity
Consultant shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by City, and hold harmless City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage which is caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Should conflict of interest principles preclude a single lawyer from representing both City and Consultant, or should City otherwise find Consultant’s legal counsel unacceptable, then Consultant shall reimburse the City its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The Consultant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.

Compliance
The Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and shall observe and comply with and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to 3 observe and comply with all federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this Contract or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.

Billing
The Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this Contract. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until six (6) months after the final payments under this Contract are made to the Consultant.

Termination Upon Notice
This Agreement may be terminated by the City by giving the Consultant thirty (30) days written notice to the other party.

Termination for Unsatisfactory Performance
Should the City at any time become dissatisfied with the Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon giving notice in writing to the Consultant. The City shall be the sole judge as to whether the performance of the Consultant is satisfactory.

Time is of the Essence
Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

Arbitration
Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment on the award rendered by the Arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction.

Notices
Any notices to be given hereunder by either party to the other, may be affected either by personal delivery in writing or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested. Mailed notices shall be addressed to the addresses of the parties as they appear in the introductory paragraph of this agreement, but each party may change address by written notice in accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally shall be deemed communicated as of actual receipt; mailed notices shall be deemed communicated as of five (5) days after mailing.

Entire Contract
This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the rights herein granted and the obligations herein assumed. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this instrument shall be of no force or effect excepting a subsequent modification in 4 writing, signed by the party to be charged.

Partial Invalidity
Partial invalidity of this agreement shall not affect the remainder.

Governing Law
The validity of this agreement and of any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereunder, shall be interpreted and construed pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date first hereinabove written.
“CITY” __________________________

City of Waterford ________________________
By: ________________________ By: ________________________ Michael G. Pitcock
City Manager

ATTEST:
___________________________
Patricia Krause, CMC,
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Corbett J. Browning
City Attorney
General Business 6e
May 19, 2022
Darin Dupont, Robbins, Browning, Godwin & Marchini, LLP City Council Staff Report
Resolution: Adopting Resolution 2022-31, Authorizing the City Manager to Submit a Ballot Measure to the City’s Qualified Voters at the November 08, 2022, Statewide General Election, Authorizing a Four-Year term for the Office of the Mayor for the City of Waterford
SUMMARY:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution, authorizing the City Manager to submit a ballot measure to the City’s qualified voters at the November 08, 2022, Statewide General Election, authorizing a four-year term for the office of the Mayor for the City of Waterford.

ANALYSIS:

The qualified electors for the City of Waterford have historically elected a Mayor for a term of two-years. On November 4, 1986, the City Council submitted for question and the electors approved, an elective mayor for the City of Waterford for a two-year term. Subsequently in 1988, the first elective mayor was elected for a two-year term and the same has been done every election after.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 34900, a General Law City may submit to the electors of the City the question of whether electors shall elect a mayor who shall serve a two-year term or four-year term.

The adoption of the resolution will allow the ballot measure to be placed on the November 08, 2022, Statewide General Election. Upon adoption, the City Manager and City Clerk will file a copy of the resolution with the County Board of Supervisors to request that such elections be consolidated, which is required under Elections Code section 10403.

After the request for consolidation, the City Clerk will publish a public notice including the election date, election location, ballot question, passage requirement, and argument and rebuttal deadlines. The deadline to file arguments for or against the ballot measure is July 28, 2022. The deadline to file rebuttals to those arguments is August 05, 2022.

Lastly, the City Attorney will prepare an Impartial Analysis of the ballot measure and the effect of the measure on existing law and the operation of the measure.

The ballot measure will appear on the Statewide General Election ballot on November 08, 2022 and requires a majority of the votes cast to pass.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Take no action.

2. Provide staff with further direction.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Resolution # 2022-31
• Ballot Measure
RESOLUTION 2022-31

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION 2022-31
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-31, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT A BALLOT MEASURE TO THE CITY’S QUALIFIED VOTERS AT THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022, STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION,

AUTHORIZING A FOUR-YEAR TERM FOR THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR FOR

THE CITY OF WATERFORD
WHEREAS, on November 4, 1986, the electors of the City of Waterford approved an elective mayor for the City of Waterford to serve a term of two years; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Waterford has served for a term of two-years since the position was first elected in November of 1988; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 34900, the City Council may submit to the electors the question of whether the Mayor for the City of Waterford shall serve a term of office for four years; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council seeks authorization for the Mayor of the City of Waterford to serve a four-year term of office; and
WHEREAS, the question shall be printed on the ballots used in the November 8, 2022, Statewide General Election pursuant to and in the form set forth in Government Code section 34901; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 10400 et seq., the City Council finds it necessary and desirable to request consolidation of this measure with the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors and Registrar of Voters.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Waterford as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by Reference.

2. The City Council hereby calls for and orders an election and submits to the qualified electors of the City of Waterford at the next Statewide General Election, the question of whether the Mayor for the City of Waterford shall serve a term of office for four years, as set forth as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This Resolution constitutes the order of the City Council to call for such an election.

3. Pursuant to Government Code section 34902, the vote requirement for the measure to pass is a majority of the votes cast.

4. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus is hereby requested to consolidate the election RESOLUTION 2022-31
with the General Election on Tuesday November 8, 2022, for the purpose of consideration of adoption of a measure relating to the term of office for the Mayor of the City of Waterford to serve a term of office for four years:

Shall the elective mayor for the City of
Waterford serve a four-year term?
Yes
No

5. The notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.

6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the County Election Division of the County of Stanislaus.

7. The City Clerk is directed to forward without delay to the County Registrar of Voters, a certified copy of this Resolution.

8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Waterford, County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of May 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

City of Waterford
____________________________
Jose Aldaco, Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form:
______________________________ _____________________________ Patricia Krause, CMC, City Clerk Corbett J. Browning, Attorney EXHIBIT “A”

BALLOT MEASURE
Shall the elective mayor for the City of
Waterford serve a four-year term?
Yes
No
Informational Items 8
May 19, 2022
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager City Council Staff Report
Informational Items.

SUMMARY:

Items included in this section provide City Council with updates on business not requiring a full report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
ANALYSIS:

All items under this category are considered for informational purpose only.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A
ALTERNATIVES:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
8a: City Project List
Streets
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
Yosemite Ave. Pedestrian Project (CalTrans) Michael Pitcock Lonnie Statzer High $6 Million Caltrans is lead agency
H & I Streets Rehabilitation Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $500,000 (CDBG) Awarded
F Street Overlay Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $1,200,000 In Design
2022 Slurry and Cape Seals Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $500,000 In Design
Western at F Street Improvements Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $300,000 (CDBG) Environmental Review Housing Development
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
Pecan / Pasadena Subdivision Michael Pitcock High NA Homes in Construction. All homes sold.

Bentley Estates Michael Pitcock High NA Tentative Map Approved Economic Development
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
F St and Yosemite Redevelopment (Burned Building) Michael Pitcock High N/A Received application for a Fuel Station/Convenience Store
Facilities / Property
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
ADA Transition Plan Implementation Lonnie Statzer Low Varies Ongoing 109 E St. Public Works Shop Sale Lonnie Statzer Low N/A For sale Local Hazardous Mitigation Plan Update Lonnie Statzer Low N/A County Wide Plan Process has Started City Projects
Council Chambers Equipment Upgrade Patricia Krause High $52,000 Waiting on Equipment Public Safety
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
License Plate Reader Program Michael Pitcock High
$10,000 up front and $3,300
monthly for maintenance and
monitoring.

Cameras have been installed. In start up.

Utilities
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
WWTP Biosolids Screening Upgrade - Self Help Enterprises Grant
Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $500k Unfunded Grant Application submitted Water System Consolidation - Hickman Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $3M Unfunded Grant Application submitted Tim Bell Water and Sewer Extension to Vineyard Michael Pitcock Lonnie Statzer High $2.5M ARPA In Design
Parks and Trails
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
Triangle Parcel - Neighborhood Park Lonnie Statzer High $133,000 Park Impact Fees On hold as funding for Dog Park is higher prioroity
S. Reinway Sports Complex Lonnie Statzer Low Unfunded On Hold Dog Park (Prop 68 Per Capita Grant) Lonnie Statzer High 180000 Grant and Park Impact Fees Bids being Evaluated
Beard Park Improvements (Prop 68 Competitive Grant) Lonnie Statzer High 1.5 Million Unfunded Grant Denied. Waiting to see if another cycle to apply is available.

Other Projects
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update